NCD095458527_19970318_FCX Inc. (Statesville)_FRBCERCLA RA_Groundwater Remediation Proposal OU-1-OCR

~.u-,---·
-~:;~~;----~~
NOV 1 O 1998
SUPERFUNU ::,i:cv I ivN
GROUNDWATER REMEDIATION PROPOSAL
FCX -ST A TES VILLE SITE
OPERABLE UNIT 1
Statesville, NC
WESTON Solicitation No. 78-4RA8M
Westinghouse Proposal No. 3200-97-0201
Submitted to:
Ralph McKeen
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
1880-H Beaver Ridge Circle
Norcross, GA 30071
Submitted by:
Westinghouse Remediation Services, Inc.
2441 Monticello Drive
Tallahassee, Florida 32303
[phone]
March 18, 1997
•
ID Task Name
1 Bid Award
2 Notice to Proceed
3 Subcontractor HASP/QAPP
Pump Test Work Plan
4 Approval of HASP/QAPP
Pump Test Work Plan
5 Install Test Well & Pump Test
6 Subcontractor RA WP -
Draft Submittal
7 Subcontractor RA WP -
Review Comments
8 Subcontractor RA WP -
Final Submittal
9 Remedial Construction
10 Performance Period
11 Begin Base O&M Period
12 One-Year O&M
13 End of ARCS Contract
Project: FCX -OU1
Date: 5/22/97
Duration Apr
1d
7d
28d
14d
14d
54d
10d
14d
90d
37d
1d
262d
Od
Task
Progress
Jun Jul
5/2
5/2
7/1
Qtr 3, 1997
Aug
Milestone
Summary
8/22
Qtr 4, 1997
Sep Oct Nov
♦ • •
Dec
FCX-Operable Unit 1
Groundwater Remediation
Qtr 1, 1998
Jan Feb Mar
2/19
Qtr 2, 1998
Apr May Jun
2/20 /13
I 4\14
' I , I 4/15
I
Rolled Up Task
I Rolled Up Milestone 0
Page 1
Rolled Up Progress
Qtr 3, 1998 Qtr 4, 1998 Qtr 1, 1999 Qtr 2,199
Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May
4/15
• •
Westinghouse
Remediation Services, Inc.
111 Kelsey Lane. Suite B
Tampa, Florida 33619
(813) 620-1..t32
Fa:,; (813) 620-36,19
•
2•141 Mor:ticetlo Drive
Tallahassee. Florida 32303
[phone]
FaK {904) 531-9866
March 18, 1997
Mr. Ralph McKeen
Roy F. Weston, Inc.
1880-H Beaver Ridge Circle
Norcross, GA 30071
10025 NV✓ 11 G Way, Suite 12
Miami. Florida 33178
(305) 888-,1090
Fax [phone]
Re: FCX Operable Unit I Solicitation
Statesville. North Carolina
Solicitation No. 78-4RA8M
Dear Mr. McKeen:
'8"•"'.,l . .
.1.io 1 V111t.)la11{t Roac1. Suite A,t
OrlanClo. Floncla 32811
{•IU/) G-18-9009
Fa, (•lOi') 6-18-99,!7
15 NE 35th Avenue
Gainesville, Floridn 32609
[phone]
Fax [phone]
Westinghouse Remediation Services, Inc. (Westinghouse) is pleased to respond to the
referenced solicitation. The bid schedule form is attached to this letter, as is the
conceptual design and a list of exceptions. A description of Westinghouse's corporate
experience, proposed key personnel and subcontractors, and organizational conflict of
interest statement are included in this letter. The following appendices contain additional
information requested in the solicitation:
A. Licenses, Insurance Certificate, Small Business Plan
B. Project Descriptions
C. Bonding Confirmation
D. Health and Safety Information
E. Critical Path Method Schedule
F. QA Plan
G. Key Personnel Resumes
This proposal was prepared to respond to the February 1997 Bidding Documents for FCX
Operable Unit 1, Groundwater Remediation, and the following addenda:
Addendum No. 1, dated February 14, 1997;
Addendum No. 2, dated February 21, 1997;
Addendum No. 3, dated March 6, 1997; and
Addendum No. 4, dated March 11, 1997.
A Westinghouse Electric Corporation subsidiary.
Mr. Ralph McKeen
March 18, 1997
Page 2 of4 • •
Westinghouse is an established full-service environmental consultant, providing environmental assessment, engineering, design, remediation/construction. and emergency response services for hazardous waste and contaminated materials. We have been i_n business for 14 years and have completed over 4,500 environmental projects involving the technical and management work elements required for this contract. We have provided groundwater remediation design and treatment system installation services since 1989. We have extensive experience in serving government agencies under indefinite quantity, delivery order contracts to provide both emergency response to hazardous situations and planned response for more routine assessment and remediation services. We have served since 1984 as an Emergency Response Cleanup Services (ERCS) contractor in USEPA Region IV, and since 1989 in USEPA Region II. We have served the Florida Department of Transportation as a full-service environmental contractor continuously since 1990. We perform remediation/assessment services under contract to the Georgia Environmental Protection Division and were recently awarded a similar two-year contract by the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Regulation. Our environmental work is guided by long-established and well-defined procedures and standards for project management, health and safety, quality assurance, and regulatory compliance.
Westinghouse is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Westinghouse Electric Company (WEC), a Fortune 50 company with a I I 0-year history of technical innovation and management excellence. We are backed by the stability of WEC, including financial soundness and virtually unlimited bonding capacity. We can also draw upon the impressive resources and experience of WEC's environmental arm, including over 12,500 degreed environmental professionals.
Westinghouse has undertaken and performed all activities essential to environmental assessment, engineering, design, remediation, and construction. We have considerable local and regional experience in successfully performing on contracts similar to that proposed by WESTON. We have worked in a full range of environmental regulatory areas, including CERCLA, RCRA, TSCA, and other Federal programs, as well as under various State environmental regulations and ordinances. We provide expert services in the routinely applied primary remedial technologies and lead the industry in the application of innovative technologies.
A partial list of the services we offer includes:
2 •
Mr. Ralph McKeen
March 18, 1997
Page 3 of4 •
Engineeringffechnical Services
Contamination assessment/documentation
(PCAP, PCAR, CAP, CAR. RI/FS)
Remedial design/engineering (RAP, RD)
• Risk assessment
Environmental audits
Civil engineering design
Preparation of plans and bid documents
Field sampling and analysis
Treatability studies
Regulatory support'and compliance
Expert witness testimony
• Public relations support
Technical support
Construction Services
• Installation, operation, and maintenance of
remedial treatment systems
Site grading, excavation, and backfill
Removal/replacement of pavement systems·
• Utility installation and relocation
Site dewatering and groundwater control
• Excavation bracing
Building demolition
Facility decontamination and demolition
• Foundation construction
Site restoration
•
Solids Handling and Treatment
Drum and contaminated media removal
Soil excavation
Stabi I ization/fixation
Sludge dewatering and drying
• Soil washing
Thermal desorption
Soil vapor extraction
• Biological treatment
Transportation and disposal management
Water Handling and Treatment
• Dewatering
• Groundwater/surface water recovery
• LNAPL/DNAPL recovery
• Groundwater pumping
• On-site water/groundwater treatment
• Contaminant plume control
• Groundwater cutoff walls
• Transportation and disposal management
Specialty Remediation Services
Emergency response services
Storage tank removal/replacement
• Lagoon closure
• Lead based paint assessment and abatement
Asbestos assessment and abatement
Westinghouse is a licensed North Carolina General Contractor and has a North Carolina
registered Professional Engineer on staff. Copies of the appropriate licenses are included
in Appendix A.
The following key personnel are proposed for use on this project.
individual are included in Appendix G.
NAME CONTRACT POSITION
Bill Norton, P.E. Project Manager
Gordon Dean, P.E. Design Manager
Andrew Hooper, G.C. Field Superintendent/ Field
Quality Control Manager
John Lee Chief Operator
3
Resumes for each
YEARS OF
EXPERIENCE
30
13 ·
9
15
Mr. Ralph McKecn
March 18, 1997
Page 4 of4 • •
Westinghouse is a turnkey contractor and will self-perform the majority of site activities.
The following major subcontractors are proposed for use on this project:
SUBCONTRACTOR DESCRIPTION OF TYPE OF ESTIMATED
AND ADDRESS WORK CONTRACT VALUE
Savannah Laboratories Analytical Services. Unit Price $150,000
5102 LaRoche Ave.
Savannah, GA. 31404
U.S. Filter/Geopure Equipment supply. Lump Sum $60,000
2300 NW 71 st Place
Gainesville, FL 32653
Graham & Currie Well Well Drilling. Lump Sum $50,000
Drilling Company
4530 NC Hwy 73
West End, NC 27376
Other minor subcontractors may be used at Westinghouse's convenience.
Westinghouse warrants that, to the best of Westinghouse's knowledge and belief, there
are no relevant facts or circumstances which could give rise to an organizational or
personal conflict of interest, as defined in FAR Subpart 9.5. Westinghouse agrees that if
an actual or potential organizational or personal conflict of interest is discovered after
award, Westinghouse will make a full disclosure in writing to WESTON. This disclosure
shall include a description of actions which Westinghouse has taken or proposes to take,
after consultation with WESTON, to avoid, mitigate, or neutralize the actual or potential
conflict.
Westinghouse looks forward to a favorable review of this proposal and a mutually
rewarding working relationship. Please direct any future communications to my attention
at:
Westinghouse Remediation Services, Inc.
2441 Monticello Drive
Tallahassee, FL 32303
[phone]
[phone] FAX.
Sincerely,
WLsJ:se;;::zi~
Wm. Gordon Dean, P.E.
Technical Group Manager
4
• •
BID SUBJ\ITIT AL FORM
The undersigned, in compliance with the Bid Documents issued by Roy F. Weston, Inc., on behalf of the United States Environmental Protection Agency, Region IV, on 2 -9 7 * hereby submits this bid to perform groundwater remediation at the FCX site in Statesville, North Carolina, as presented in the request for proposal.
The bidder certifies that the bidding furn has carefully examined all drawings and specifications associated with the proposed project, has visited the site, and has completed all necessary documents as required for the bid package for this project.
The bidder further certifies that the work outlined in the bid package will be carried out for the lump sum prices and fixed unit prices shown on the Bid Schedule and that the bid will be valid for 120 days from the date shown below.
Based on the quantities provided by the engineer and verified by the bidder, this work will be performed for the sum of $645,250. o_o
FIRi'\f NAME
SIGNATURE
NMIE (Print/Type)
TITI..E
DATE
Six Hundred Fourty-Five Thousand, Two Hundred
and Fifty Dollars and zero Cents.
Westinghouse Remediation Services, Inc.
Hugh F. Daugherty
President
March 13, 1997
*=Including the following addenda:
Addendum No. 1 dated 2-14-97
Addendum No. 2 dated 2-21-97
Addendum No. 3 dated 3-6-97
Addendum No. 4 dated 3-11-97
A-14
• •
This document was prepared by Roy F. Weston, Inc., expressly for EPA. tt shall not be disclosed. in whole or in part. without the express written permission of EPA
Item
001
PRICE SCHEDULE
Remedial Action
Supplies or Services and Price
Supplies/Services Unit
Groundwater Pumping Test and Groundwater Per Lot
Remediation System, including extraction system.
treatment system, and discharge system. All
oe.cessary services include supplies, labor, and
equipment to achieve performance criteria as defined
in the Statement of Work (SOW). The system price
includes, but is not limited to, health and safety
plan, quality assurance project plan, obtaining
required penruts, groundwater pumping tests,
remediation system design, work plans, remediation
system purchase and installation, utility hook--ups.
start•up. performance demonstration,
laboratory/analytical services, submittal of as-built
drawings, and site cleanup. This item includes all
activities up to the point of caking title to the system
by the government.
,.,.o:; "~ w;:. c.:.:00•07:l',SQWA?M0T.W~ 4-3
Groundwater Remedial Action
Statement of Work
FCX Site • OU 1
Section: 4
Revision; 1
Date: February 1997
Unit Est.
Price Quantity
I
Total
Cost
279,5 0 279,50
• •
This document was prepared by Roy F. Weston. Inc., expressly for EPA. tt shall not be disclosed, in whole or in part, without the express wrinen permission of EPA.
Item
002
PRICE SCHEDULE (Continued)
Remedial Action
Supplies or Services and Price
Supplies/Services Unit
Base Period Operation and Maintenance, Per Lot
consisting of 47 weeks of successful operation
completed within the first 52 weeks after the
acceptance of the demonstration report. All
necessary services, supplies, equipment, utilities,
and labor to complete the base period requirements;
O&M Manual preparation and updating; repair
and/or replacement of all equipment required for
successful operation in accordance with the accepted
work plan. required permi1s. and the SOW;
groundwater and system monitoring. chemical
analysis. and reporting; and residuals disposal and
contract closeout activities (excluding system
removal).
0&~1 base period begins upon written approval by
the Project Representative of the performance
demonstration results.
Prices associated with O&M activities for optional
items are not to be included in this line item.
4-4
Groundwater Remedial Action
Statement of Work
FCX Site · OUl
Section: 4
Revision: 1
Date: February 1997
Unit Est.
Price Quantity
Total
Cost
219,2~ 0 I 219,25(
• •
This document was prepared by Roy F. Weston, Inc., expressly for EP.A It shall not be disclosed. in whole or in part. without the express written permission of EPA
Item
003
004
PRICE SCHEDULE (Continued)
Remedial Action
Supplies or Services and Price
Supplies/Services Unit
OPTIONAL SERVICES
Optional O&M -I to IO quarters of O&M services Per after the Base Period of Operation and Maintenance Quarter
(Item 002). All necessary services, supplies, Year
equipment. utilities, and labor to complete the
optional period O&M requirements; repair and/or
replacement of all equipment required for successful
operation in accordance with the accepted work
plan. required permits. and the SOW; groundwater
and system rnoo.itoring, chc[Illcal analysis. toxicity
testing, and reporting; and residuals disposal. Only
quarters of successful operation. as defined in. the
Statement of Work. shall be paid for.
Prices associated with O&M for Optional Items 004
and 005 are not to be included in this line item.
Increased Extraction Rate Option -All necessary Per L<>t services, supplies, equipment, utilities, and labor to
increase the minimum extraction rate to greater than
25 gpm but oot to exceed 50 gpm; upgrading of
pumps. piping meters, va1vcs, treatment equipment,
and supplies and other remediation system
components to handle the increased flow, and
additional residuals disposal. lb.is item includes
activities up to the point of acceptance of the
demonstration report and taking title to the system
by the government. Prices shall reflect increase
above price for I tern 00 I.
4-5
Groundwater Remedial Action
Statement of Work
FCX Site • OU1
Section: 4
Revision: 1
Date: February 1997
Unit Est.
Price Quantity
2
Total
Cost
p4,751 109,500
I
3,500 3,500
-
• •
This document was prepared by Roy F. Weston, Inc., expressly for EPA tt shall not be disclosed. in whole or in part, without the express written permission o1 EPA
Item
005
006
007
PRICE SCHEDULE (Continued)
Remedial Action
Supplies or Services and Price
Supplies/Services Unit
lncreased Extraction Rate O&M Option -

1

to 18 Per
quarters of O&M services for Optional Item 004 Quarter
after system demonstration. All necessary services, Year
supplies, equipment, utilities, and labor to complete
the optional O&M requirements; repair and/or
replacement of all equipment required for successful
operation in accordance with the accepted Work
Plan, required permits, and the SOW; system
monitoring and reporting; and residuals disposal.
Only quarters of successful operation, as defined in
the SOW, shall be paid for.
Optional Extraction Well Installation -

1

to 5 Per
Extraction Wells, fully penetrating the surficial Well
aquifer (not to exceed depth of 65 feet). All
necessary supplies and services for the installation of
extraction wells including requir¢.d pumps and
connections, in addition to the extraction wells
specified in Item 00 !. Extraction wells shall be
installed in accordance with the SOW, State of
North Carolina requirements, and standard industry
practices.
Optional Extraction Well Piping -

1

to 1,000 ft. Per Foot
All supplies and services necessary for the
installation of piping to connect additional extraction
wells to the treatment system in accordance with the
specification. The Contractor shall only be paid for
the actual amount necessary to perform the
connection in the shonest ecoaomica.J distance (in a
straight line, unless necessary to bypass objects and
properties).
4-6
Groundwater Remedial Action
Statement of Work
FCX Site -OU 1
Section: 4
Revision: 1
Date: February 1997
Unit Est. Total
Price Quantity Cost
2,300 4 9,200
1 0, 7( 0 I 10,700
1 0. 4 500 5,200
• •
This document was prepared by Roy F. Weston, Inc., expressly for EPA. It shall not be disclosed, in whole or in pan. without the express written permission of EPA.
Item
008
009
010
01 I
012
PRICE SCHEDULE (Continued)
Remedial Action
Supplies or Services and Price
Supplies/Services Unit
Optional !lfonitoring Well Installation -

I

to 5 Per
surficial aquifer wells. All necessary supplies and Well
services for the installation and development of
monitoring wells fully penetrating the surficial
aquifer (not to exceed depth of 65 feet). Monitoring
wells shall be installed in accordance with the SOW,
State of Norlh Carolina requirements, and standard
industry practices.
Optional Transition to New System Operator -Per Lot
Services associated with transferring operation of the
remediation system, including optional components,
to a subsequent operator. The services shall include
providing operator training.
Post-Remediation Quarterly Monitoring Option -Per
1 to 8 events. All necessary supplies and services to Event
perfonn quarterly groundwater monitoring and
report results after the remediation system has been
shut down following cleanup goal attainment. as
specified in the SOW.
Optional System Removal -Services associated Per Lot
with demobilization and delivery of the remediation
system to the government freight~n-board origin
point nearest to the site.
Optional Well Abandonment -

I

to 100 cubic Per
yards of well void space. All necessary services Cubic
and supplies to abandon extraction and monitoring Yard
wells in accordance with State of North Carolina
requirements and standard industry practices.
4-7
Groundwater Remedial Action
Statement of Work
FCX Site -OU1
Section: 4
Revision: 1
Date: February 1997
Unit Est.
Price Quantity
Total
Cost
, , 900 I 5,900
2,500 I 2,500
XXX I xxxx
XXX I xxxx
XXX 35 xxxx
-
• •
FCX -ST A TES VILLE
CONCEPTUAL REMEDIAL DESIGN
The design pumping rate is calculated from the required radius of influence and pertinent
aquifer characteristics. The required radius of influence is determined by measuring
between the specified extraction well locations to be approximately 20.5 feet. The
pertinent aquifer characteristics were determined during the contamination assessment
activities by Roy F. Weston, Inc. The design calculations use the Theis equation, which
is appropriate for any duration pumping.
The following references were used in this analysis:
l. Driscoll, Groundwater and Wells, 2nd Edition, Johnson Filtration Systems, l 986.
2. Grubb, Analytical Mode/for Estimation of Steady-State Capture Zones of Pumping
Wells in Confined and Unconfined Aquifers, Ground Water Vol. 31 No. l
January l 993
3. Javandel, Capture-Zone Type Curves: A Too/for Aquifer Cleanup, Ground Water
Vol. 24. No. 5, September 1986
4. Todd, Groundwater Hydrology. John Wiley & Sons, 1980.
5. Yang, Analytical Solutions for Determination of Non-Steady-State and Steady-
State Capture Zones, Ground Water Monitoring and Remediation, Winter 1995
The design calculations indicate that a pumping rate of I gpm from each of the 10
extraction wells will produce 8.3 feet of drawdown in each well and a downgradient
stagnation point of 497 feet from the well location. This will be more than sufficient to
produce the desired downgradient capture zone. The analysis also indicates that the
predicted stagnation point will not be achieved for 325 years. However, a stagnation
point of 25 feet is achievable within 110 days and will create the desired barrier to
migration.
The groundwater will be extracted from the wells by means of submersible pneumatic
pumps. These pumps feature automatic operation that adjusts the pumping rate without
downhole controls. The pumps will be connected by a common header to an industrial
compressor in the treatment compound. The extracted groundwater will be piped to the
treatment compound via l.5-inch diameter Schedule 40 PVC pipe.
Groundwater entering the treatment compound will be directed to a 300-gallon holding
tank. The water will be pumped from the holding tank by a transfer pump and will
initially be treated with aqueous solutions of potassium permanganate and an anionic
polymer flocculant. The chemicals will be contained in drums and will be injected into
• •
the influent line by chemical feed pumps. Mixing will be accomplished by an in-line
static mixer. The created floe will be allowed to settle in a 1,200-gallon baffied
sedimentation tank. Accumulated sludge will be removed as needed by hand and will be
thickened in a gravity separation unit prior to storage in a 55-gallon drum. The treated
water will be pumped through an automatically backwashing sand filter to remove
suspended particulates. The clarified water will then be pumped through two sets of high
pressure carbon canisters and discharged to the sanitary sewer. A telemetry system will
be installed to shut down the system immediately in case of emergency conditions and to
automatically notify the operator.
The treatment system will be skid mounted in a self-contained, prefabricated building.
The specific equipment proposed for this project include the following:
4-inch diameter, flush-threaded Schedule 40 PVC casing and screen (Tri-Loe or
equivalent) for the extraction wells.
1.5-inch diameter Schedule 40 PVC collection piping.
U.S. Filter/Geopure RB-10 I Retriever pneumatic pumps
U.S. Filter HR I 0-I 2 compressor package
LMI A I 51-19 chemical injection pumps
U.S. Filter 50FGB2L automatic backwashing sand filter
U.S. Filter ASC I 200 liquid phase carbon vessels
Self-contained treatment building, steel floor, walls and ceiling have interior and exterior
aluminum skin with a 3-inch polystyrene core, NEMA-4 enclosed controls.
2
• •
FCX -ST ATES VILLE
EXCEPTIONS AND CLARIFICATIONS
The following specific exceptions and bid clarifications are listed. Any changes to the
noted exceptions will require a renegotiation of the listed prices.
I. The proposed system may affect upgradient groundwater contamination known to
exist at the Burlington site. Westinghouse will assume no liability under any
circumstance for moving, exacerbating, or otherwise affecting the upgradient
contamination.
2. The system is to be constructed under CERCLA authority. Neither double-walled
pipe nor dual containment of the treatment system vessels to comply with RCRA
requirements is included.
3. Bid item 005 (increased extraction rate O&M option) is in addition to the cost of
bid items 002 and 003 (base period and optional O&M).
4.
5.
The startup period is defined as 96 consecutive hours. The performance
demonstration period is defined as 30 days. The base year of successful
performance is determined by completion of 4 7 successful weeks of treatment.
Optional quarters of successful operation are determined by completion of 12
successful weeks of treatment. The performance and payment periods for each
shall be extended until the specified time frames are successfully completed
unless incompetent or negligent performance on the part of Westinghouse is
demonstrated.
This bid includes all of the equipment specified in the Request for Proposal. Any
additional equipment will be at additional cost.
6. The existing drums are assumed to be in sound condition. This bid does not
include labor or materials to overpack drums prior to moving them.
7. Article 18 -Last Line -change to "Contractor's negligent performance".
8. Article 26 -Option for Other Services -First Paragraph -replace "within" with
"on or before".
9. Sections 3.2.5 and 3.4.2 -The bid includes costs to develop each extraction well
for 4 hours and to purge each well before sampling for I hour. Additional time to
meet the turbidity requirements will be at extra cost.
,I
I !
I ' !
• •
I 0. Section 3.5.1 -As-Built Drawings -The as-built drawings will contain only
general, non-surveyed locations of any existing underground utilities and
appurtenances.
11. Section 3.8 -Summary of Performance Criteria -As discussed in Addendum 3,
off-site contaminant concentrations will likely not decrease for a significant
period of time. The governing performance criteria shall be capture of
contaminated groundwater flowing off-site.
I 2. The analytes listed in Table 2-3 will be the only analytes reported. Method
Detection limits will be below the remediation goals except for beryllium (IDL =
0.053 µg/1) and :J, 1-dichloroethene (MDL= 0.25 µg/1).
13. The attached liability provision is to be incorporated into the contract language.
14. This bid, including these exceptions and clarifications, shall be formally
incorporated into the contract specifications and/or documents upon award .
2 •
• •
Liability Provision
Liability
In no event shall SUBCONTRACTOR be liable (whether in tort, including negligence
and strict liability, contract, indemnity or otherwise) to the CONTRACTOR or the
CONTRACTOR's insurer for any incidental, special, indirect or consequential damage of
any kind (including but not limited to lost, delayed or diminished use of the Premises or
any plant or other facility on the Premises or any other lost delayed or diminished profits
or opportunities) resulting from the SUBCONTRACTOR's performance of or failure to
perform any work under this Contract. In no event shall SUBCONTRACTOR's liability
(whether in tort, including negligence and strict liability, contract, in.demnity or
otherwise) to CONTRACTOR resulting from SUBCONTRACTOR's performance ofor
failure to perform any Work under this Contract exceed the value of the Work giving rise
to such liability.
..
0
0
~
"' "' "' :S 3 ..l
1=;
f f
f
z 0 -E-< <
Q ~ "' "' "' "' "' :,
0 = " z -E-< "' "' "'
"' "' ..,
"' ..
"' .. ...
0 ... ..;
'"' < ta.
N
"' ..,
..;
"' ::,
E-<
...
•
•
.i
C .!
~ . ·:>irtr~-
~ ):}~{ f . TU .tfM'M_fliff .i .. tJ.lJ{,: ~..:.··:;zn_~~JWlfP. ??c!•
·ir.fl~ii·
Mar.18.1997 10:30AM WESTINGHOUSE REMEDIA •
NORTH CAROLI~
STATE BOARD OF REG~TION FOR
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS ANO LANO SURVEYORS
. THISISTOC~
{/J_j/ft,;,.,. &
(SICNA1\JR£ OF RECISTRAl"l'l
•
IS DULY RSGISl'ERED AND ENTI11.ED TO PRACTICE
ENGINEERING
UNTIL DECEMBER 31, 19'17 WHEN TIIIS CERTIFICATE EXPIRES
WITNESS OUR HANDS AND TIIESEAL OF THE BOARD
No.0501 P. 2/2
WESTINGHOUSE-TAMPA ID:813-620-3649 MAR 18'97 14:51 No.010 P.02
-.J..!.· . _____ _
.... •----
PAOOUCEA
0 CERTIFICATENO.:' 971301
Johnson & Higgins of PA, Inc.
6 PPG Place, Suite 300
Pittsburgh, PA 15222-5499
[phone]
.. --. --. • --..
THIS CEIITIFICATE IS ISSUEO ,\$ A MATTEA 0,, -OIWATIOH ONLY ANO COHfEftS NO AIOtlTS UPON THE CEATIFIC.<TE HOLDER. THIS Cl!RTIF1CATE ooe8 NOT AMEIW,
EXTEND OR ALTER TKe: COWRAGE AFFOROEO BY THE POIJCl6 BELOW.
COMPANY A LETTER
COMPANIES AFFORDING COVERAGE
Rellance lnsuranc;e Company
----------------------l COMPANY B INSURED U:TIER Rellanc:e National Indemnity Company
B
Westinghouse Electric Corporation and Its
Majority Owned Subsidiary Corporations
Westinghouse Building, 6 Gateway Center
Pittsburgh. PA 15222
COMPANY C LETTER
COMPANY D LETTER
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT POUCI.ES OF INSURANCE US TED IIELOW HAVE B£EN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POUC:Y P£AIDD INDll;j\TEO,
NOTWITHSTANIHl(O ANV REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CDN'TR._CT OR OTHER OOCIJMEN'T WITH RESPECT TO WNICl4 THIS CEfltU'ICATI! MAY .
BE ISSUEO OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRl8ED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TD ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIO'IS, ANO CONo~
TIONS Of SUCH POLICIES. UMITS SHOWN MAY HAYE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS.
TYPE OF INSURANCE
DENIERAL UADIUTY
COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY
i...o.-1-_ a.AM MADE [i]occuRfU:'4C£
owoors & C011T11ACTOAS •11:mcrM
AUTOM0811.£ LIABILITY
PN'IAIJTO
ALL OWNEO AI/TOS
SCHEDULED AUTOS
HIREO AUTOS
'<ON-OWNED AUTOS
GARAGE ll.\811.ITY
EXc;ESS UABIUTY
OIH£R TIWI IJMIISEUA F<JRM
WORKERS' COMPENSATION
AND
EMPLOYERS' UAIIILITY
OTHER
Self Insured Workers'
Compensation
POUCY NUMBER
NGA-0112620-00
NKA-0112621 ·03
NWA-0112619-03 (CAPT)
NWA-0112618·03 (OED.)
P'QLICY UrtCTNE DA TC 11NNt)(lt('O
1/1/97
1/1/97
1/1/97
fl'Ol.CY tKPtRATION
DAH:(IWIOOJVYI
1/1/98
1/1/98
1/1/98
ALL LIMIT"$ IN THOUSAtCDS
GENERAL AGGA(GAT£
P..oDUCTS,COMPtOPS ~It
PfR~AL l AOV{R~ INJIJRV
EACH 0CCUAAHCC£
cs,.
,AOKAT'f' ......
STAfUfORY
$
$
$
0
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$ 1 000 ~ACJ4AC00(~0
$ 1,000 ""5!.W-P<JUl;Y I.IIIITl
Westinghouse Electric Corporation is a qualified Self-Insurer In the following states:
AL, AR, CA, CT, DC, FL, GA, ID, IL, IN, KS, KY, LA, MA, MD, Ml, MN, MS, MO, NJ, NY,
NC, OH, OK, PA, SC, TN, VA, WA, WV
DESCRIPTION OF OPERAT10NS/LOCATIONSIVEHICLES/RESTAICTIONS/SPEC1Al ITEMS
SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLEO 11€FOR£ THE IX•
PIRATION DATE THEREOF, THE ISSUING COMPANY WILL ENDEAVOR TO
M41L 30 DAYS WRITTEN NOTICE TO THE CERTtACATE KOLOER MAMtb T0 TKE
LEFT, BUT FAILURE TO MAIL SUCH NOTICE SHALL IMPOSE NO OBUOATION OR
l.lA81lITV OF ANY .ctNO UPON TliE COMflA.ffY, ITS A0£Ht$ OIR fl£PREBEHTATTYES.
AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
/. L1 -_,L:)
• •
SMALL BUSINESS AND SMALL DISADVANTAGED
BUSINESS SUBCONTRACTING PLAN
DATE: March 17, 1997
Westinghouse Remediation Services, Inc.
675 Park North Boulevard, Building F, Suite 100, Clarkston, GA 30021
ITEM/SERVICE: Water Treatment Facility
The following, together with any attachments, is hereby submitted as a Subcontracting Plan to satisfy the
applicable requirement of Public Law 95-507 as implemented by Office of Federal Procurement Policy
(OFPP) Policy Letter 80-2. (Reference FAR 52.219-9 for Guidance.)
1. (a) The following percentage goals (expressed in terms of a percentage of total planned
subcontracting dollars) are applicable to the Work.
(i) Small Business concerns: 10°/o of total planned subcontracting dollars under this
contract will go to subcontra"ctors who are small business concerns.
(ii) Small Disadvantaged Business Concerns: 2% of total planned subcontracting
dollars under this contract will go to subcontractors who are small business
concerns owned and controlled by socially and economically disadvantaged
individuals. This percentage is included in the percentage shown under 1 (a) (i),
above, as a subset.
(b) The total estimated dollar value of all planned subcontracting (to all types of business
concerns) under this contract is approximately $150,000 .
(c) The following dollar values correspond to the percentage goals shown in (a) above.
(i) Total dollars planned to be subcontracted to small business concerns:
$15,000. This dollar amount is included in the amount shown under 1
(c) (i), above, as a subset.
(ii) Total dollars planned to be subcontracted to small disadvantaged business
concerns: $3,000. This dollar amount is included in the amount shown under 1
(c) (i), above, as a subset.
(d) The following principal products and/or services may be subcontracted under this
contract, and the distribution among small businesses and small disadvantaged
businesses is planned as follows (some products/services may be purchased from more
than one category to facilitate goal accomplishment):
Small Business Concerns: Drilling, equipment rental, construction materials
Small Disadvantaged Business Concerns: Analytical, security, equipment rental,
!
I
• •
(e) We developed the above subcontracting goals by reviewing material and service
schedules supporting the project's estimated costs, and determining which items/services
will most likely be purchased from SB/S_DB concerns. Potential SB/SOB sources have
already been identified and prequalified through our recent outreach efforts.
(f) Indirect and overhead costs have been included in the goals specified in 1 (a) and (c).
The method of arriving at the proportional share of indirect/overhead costs is based upon
the prior year's experience. These costs are largely limited to office and computer
supplies, and their proportionate share of orders placed with SB/SOB concerns is not
materially significant.
2. The following individual will administer the subcontracting program:
Name: ------=J=o~h~n.,_A~b=e"'rl=e _______ _
Telephone: ____ .,(8'-'1-"'3L) 6,,,2:.,0c..-1!.:4,.,,3""2 _____ _
Title· .. _______ _,_P.,_ro"'c,,,u,,.r"'e"'m"'e"'n.,_t= Spe"'c"'i,,_al"'is,,_t ___ _
This individual's specific duties, as they relate to this subcontracting plan, is as follows:
(a) Developing and maintaining bidders list of SB/SOB concerns from all possible sources.
(b) Ensuring that procurement packages are structured to permit SB/SOB concerns to
participate to the maximum extent possible.
(c) Ensuring inclusion of SB/SOB concerns in all solicitations for products or services in
which they are capable of providing.
(d) Reviewing solicitations to remove statements, clauses, etc., which may tend to restrict or
prohibit SB/SOB participation.
(e) Ensuring periodic rotation of potential subcontractors on bidders lists.
(f) Ensuring that the bid proposal review board documents its reasons for not selecting low
bids submitted by SB/SOB concerns. ·
(g) Ensuring the establishment and maintenance of records of solicitations and subcontracts
award activity.
(h) Attending or arranging for attendance of company buyers at Business Opportunity
Workshops, Minority Business Enterprise Seminars, Trade Fairs, etc.
(i) Conducting or arranging for the conducting of motivational training for purchasing
personnel pursuant to the intent of P.L. 95-507.
(j) Monitoring attainment of proposed goals.
(k) Preparing and submitting requisite periodic subcontracting reports.
(I) Coordinating Westinghouse's activities during the conduct of studies, surveys or
compliance reviews by Federal agencies.
(m) Coordinating the conduct of Westinghouse activities involving its Small Business and
Small Disadvantaged Business subcontracting program.
2
• •
3. The following efforts will be taken to assure that SB/SDB concerns will have an equitable
opportunity to compete for subcontracts:
(a) Outreach efforts:
(i) Contacts with minority and small business trade associations.
(ii) Contacts with business development organizations.
(iii) Attendance at small and minority business procurement conferences and trade
fairs.
(iv) Sources will be acquired through the use of the SBA's PASS system.
(b) The following internal actions will be taken to guide and direct buyers:
(i) Westinghouse Purchasing Manual directs all buyers that when and wherever
possible SB/SDB concerns will be given an opportunity to submit a quotation to
Westinghouse and buyers must document each purchase order ($5,000 and
over) with sources solicited, and their business classification status.
(ii) Workshops and training programs will be conducted.
(iii) Activities will be monitored to evaluate compliance with this subcontracting plan.
(c) SB/SDB source lists, guides and other data identifying SB/SDB concerns will be
maintained and used for subcontract solicitations.
(d) Westinghouse will include applicable FAR/EPAAR SB/SDB language in RFPs and
resulting subcontracts as mandatory flow down provisions for subcontracts awarded to
large businesses.
(e) In addition, Westinghouse will set aside solicitations for the exclusive participation of small
disadvantaged, businesses when there is a reasonable expectation of receiving at least
two competitive offers from responsible SDB firms. Likewise, solicitations will be set
aside for small.businesses when there is a reasonable expectation of receiving at least
two competitive offers from responsible SB firms. In any case, to the extent possible all
solicitations under $25,000 will be set aside for SB/SDB concerns.
(f) Westinghouse will provide management, technical production, and quality control
assistance to SB/SDB firms on an "as required" basis, as well as rapid and interim invoice
payments. Maximum efforts will be made to provide adequate information and support to
SB/SDB firms in order to strengthen their competitive position.
(g) SB/SDB concerns will be encouraged to present their capabilities and will be counseled
and informed about Westinghouse purchasing practices. Special efforts are made to
create procurement opportunities within the Westinghouse purchasing system. As an
example, Westinghouse assures that adequate and timely consideration of potential
SB/SDB concerns is taken into account in all "make -or-buy" decisions.
3
• •
(h) Solicitations will include notification to prospective bidders of the penalties associated with
misrepresentation of size status. In addition to disqualification from award eligibility,
potential penalties include those outlined in section 16(d) of the Small Business Act and
13 CFR 124.6.
4. Westinghouse assures that the clause entitled "Utilization of Small Business Concerns and Small
Disadvantaged Business Concerns" will be included in all subcontracts which offer further
subcontracting opportunities, and all subcontractors, except small business concerns, who
receive subcontracts in excess of $500,000 ($1,000,000 for construction subcontracts) will be
required to adopt and comply with a subcontracting plan similar to this one. Such plans will be
reviewed by comparing them with the provisions of Public Law 95-507 and assuring that all
minimum requirements of an acceptable subcontracting plan have been satisfied. The
acceptability of percentage goals shall be determined on a case-by-case basis depending on the
supplies/services involved, the availability of potential small and small disadvantaged
subcontractors, and prior experience. Once approved and implemented, plans will be monitored
through the submission of periodic reports, and/or, as time and availability of funds permit,
periodic visits to subcontractors' facilities to review applicable records and subcontracting program
progress.
5. Westinghouse agrees to submit periodic reports and cooperate in any studies or surveys as may
be required by Federal agencies in order to determine the extent of compliance with this
subcontracting plan and with the clause entitled "Utilization of Small Business Concerns and Small
Disadvantaged Business Concerns" contained in the contract. Westinghouse agrees to submit
Standard Form (SF) 294, Subcontracting Report for Individual Contracts, and/or SF 295,
Summary Subcontract Report, in accordance with instructions on the forms and insure that all
subcontractors submit SF 294s and 295s as required.
6. Westinghouse will maintain at least the following types of records to document compliance with
this subcontracting plan:
(a) SB/SOB concerns source lists, guides and other data identifying SB/SOB suppliers.
(b) Organizations contacted for responsible/responsive small business and small
disadvantaged business sources.
(c) Records on all subcontract solicitations over $100,000, indicating on each solicitation (1)
whether small business concerns were solicited, and if not, why not; (2) whether small
disadvantaged business concerns were solicited, and if not, why not; (3) reasons for the
failure of solicited small or small disadvantaged business concerns to receive the
subcontract award.
(d) Records to support other outreach efforts such as contacts with Minority and Small
Business Trade Associations, attendance at small and minority business procurement
conferences and trade fairs, etc.
(e) Records to support internal activities to guide and encourage buyers such as workshops,
seminars, training programs, etc., and monitoring activities to evaluate compliance.
(f) Records of all purchase orders placed pursuant to this Contract, identifying (1) purchase
order number; (2) supplier; (3) supplier classification as large, small business, small
disadvantaged business or woman owned small business; and ( 4) total dollar value of
purchase order.
4
• •
Signed:
Typed Name:
Title:
Date:
Plan Accepted By: ____________________ _
Title:
Date:
5
• • CHADBOURNE CONSTRUCTION FACILITY
CLIENT:
CLIENT CONTACT:
PROJECT LOCATION:
PERFORMANCE PERIOD:
FEES:
CONTRACT TYPE:
PROBLEM
Florida Department of Transportation,
District Ill
Jimmey Bailey, E.P.
Florida Department of Transportation,
District Ill
PO Box 607
Chipley, FL 32428-0607
[phone]
Pensacola, Florida
March 1993 -March 1997
$650,000
Time and Materials
Westinghouse Remediation Services, Inc., (Westinghouse) was awarded this project under
our District III contract with the Florida Department of Transportation (FOOT). The
Chadbourne Construction Facility produced asphalt and borrow material for roadway
construction. FOOT temporarily stationed its mobile testing laboratory at the site prior to
1970 to test the asphalt that was being produced. As a result, trichloroethene and I, I,!-
trichloroethane used in the testing process, which was unregulated at that time, were
disposed on site. The chlorinated solven_t contamination was discovered following the
discovery of petroleum contamination at the site during underground storage tank
replacement activities.
PROJECT APPROACH
As a proactive measure, .the Department retained Westinghouse to:
I. Verify the existence of the solvent contamination;
2. Establish, if possible, the responsible party; and
3. Assess and remediate the solvent contamination, if it existed.
Westinghouse prepared site-specific Health and Safety and Quality Assurance Plans prior to
mobilizing to the site. We then used a portable gas chromatograph in combination with soil
borings and temporary monitor wells to verify and identify the approximate extent of the
plume. Nested permanent wells were installed to assess horizontal and vertical dispersions
of the dense non-aqueous phase liquid (DNAPL) plume and provide laboratory verificatio_n
of the presence of contamination. The Westinghouse Mobile Laboratory was used to
rapidly pinpoint contamination in one mobilization. Through these efforts, Westinghouse
determined that the plume had moved off site and beneath Interstate 110. The plume
dimensions were approximately 1,500 feet long, 300 feet wide, and 80 feet deep. A
M:ICASESUMMICHADBRN.DOC Page 1 o/2
CHADBOURNE CONSTR.ION FACILITY •
Contamination Assessment Report was prepared and approved by the Florida Department
of Environmental Protection (FDEP).
Westinghouse designed a remedial system consisting of soil vapor extraction, groundwater
recovery from four recovery wells and air stripping of the recovered water. Following
approval by FDEP, Westinghouse installed, operated, and maintained the treatment system,
which operated continuously and successfully for 15 months. Contaminant concentrations
in all monitor wells on site were reduced to below MCLs at the end of that time. A year of
post-remediation monitoring was initiated and successfully completed in January 1997. A
Site Rehabilitation Completion Report has been prepared and submitted.
RESULTS·
The treatment system has effectively captured the DNAPL plume using high-volume liquid
recovery combined with air stripping, preventing further migration. It reduced groundwater
solvent, petroleum and soil vapor concentrations to acceptable regulatory limits, and
concentrations remained below those limits for one year of post-remediation monitoring.
M:ICASESUMMICIIADBRN.DOC Page 2of2
• •
FORT LAUDERDALE REMEDIAL ACTION
CLIENT:
CLIENT CONTACT:
PROJECT LOCATION:
PERFORMANCE PERIOD:
FEES:
PROJECT MANAGER:
PROBLEM
Florida Department of Transportation
Desmond L. Tilles, P.E.
Florida Department of Transportation
5548 NW Powerline Road
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33309
[phone]
Fort Lauderdale, Florida
March I 99 I -Ongoing
$631,000
Joseph Scech
Westinghouse Remediation Services, Inc. (Westinghouse) was contracted by the Florida
Department of Transportation (FOOT) to design, construct and implement a groundwater and soil
treatment system to remediate petroleum-contaminated soil and groundwater.
PROJECT APPROACH
Westinghouse was requested_to install and imp!ement a water treatment system, designed by others,
to remediate petroleum-contaminated groundwater. The syste_m was successfully installed, but after
start-up it was determined that the system was undersized. Concentrations of dissolved constituents
far exceeded the system's designed capabilities.
imately 200 feet by 200 feet.
The FOOT extended
Westinghouse's contract in
order to assess the extent of
contamination that existed
during installation. The
assessment was designed to
determine the extent of
dissolved constituents in the
groundwater as well as the
soil surrounding the existing
pump islands and under-
ground storage tanks (USTs).
It was determined that the
contamination extended 60 -
feet below land surface and
encompassed an area approx-
Following assessment activities, Westinghouse submitted a remedial action modification to the
FDEP. Within this modification, a new treatment system was designed that consisted of three
M:ICASESUMMIFTLVAPOR.DOC Page I o/2
FORT LAUDERDALE REME. ACTION •
independent systems, including an air stripper with vapor treatment, a soil vapor extraction system
and a free product recovery system. Prior to construction, Westinghouse obtained required pennits
from the South Florida Water Management District for water use and the Broward County
Department of Natural Resources Air Quality Section for the system's air emission.
The air stripping system consisted of two recovery
wells placed to capture the vertical and horizontal
extent of contamination.• Water was transferred to
a 30-foot by 30-foot air stripper by submersible
pumps and underground piping, treated to
discharge limits and infiltrated on site through an
infiltration gallery. The air stripper off-gas was
treated through six 1,500-pound carbon filters as
the air emissions for the stripper exceeded county
requirements.
The water treatment system was equipped with
telemetry controls so that the system could be
monitored remotely from the Tampa Operations
Center. Westinghouse designed this system so that
it would call the Center in the event of an
equipment failure. This would alert Westinghouse
to a problem and we could either call the system to
correct or diagnose the problem or schedule a site
visit.
The soil vapor extraction system consisted of six
8-foot extraction wells and 400 feet of horizontal extraction pipe. The system was designed to
remove contaminants from the contaminated soil, treat them with a catalytic engine and discharge the
vapors to the atmosphere. The free product recovery consisted of an air-driven, free-floating pump
head that collected free product from the surface of the aquifer and transferred it to a holding tank.
The collected product was transported off site to a licensed recycler.
RESULTS
The system's new design, approved by the FDEP, is currently in the operation and maintenance
phase of the project. Since start-up in October 1995, the air emissions have been drastically reduced
and Broward County has granted pennission to remove the air emission treatment system. The
systems have been operating for over a year and have been providing significant influence on the
plumes.
M:\CASESUMMIFTL VAPOR.DOC Page2of2
• HOLLINGSWORTH SITE REMEDIATION
CLIENT:
CLIENT CONTACT:
PROJECT LOCATION:
PERFORMANCE PERIOD:
FEES:
PROBLEM
Enserch. Environmental Corporation
(formerly Ebasco Services, Inc.)
Mr. J. David Knapp
Enserch Environmental Corporation
2211 West Meadowview Road
Greensboro, NC 27407-3488
(9 I 0) 855-7500
Fort Lauderdale, Florida
August 1989 -December I 994
$1.25 million
Westinghouse Remediation Services, Inc.
(Westinghouse) was competitively awarded this
contract as the remedial action contractor for the
Hollingsworth Solderless Terminal Company.
This Superfund site, on the USEPA National
Priorities List, was being remediated under the
USEPA Alternative Remedial Action Contract
Services (ARCS) IV contract. Remedial action
objectives of the project were to treat soil and a
large volume of groundwater contaminated with
trichloroethene, cis ( 1,2)-dichloroethene, and
vinyl chloride. Westinghouse was contracted to
fabricate, install, start up and operate a
groundwater treatment system designed by
another contractor, and to implement the soil
remediation system designed by the same
contractor. However, because of flaws in the
design, Westinghouse and the client worked
together to redesign both the groundwater and the
soil treatment systems.
PROJECT APPROACH
Upon arrival at the site, Westinghouse built and installed the groundwater treatment system designed
by the client's engineering contractor. However, project complications resulting from faulty designs
for both the soil and )he groundwater treatment systems resulted in the need for extensive project
modifications. After system startup, it was discovered that the specified recovery wells and the
grade of sand for the well sand pack were inappropriate for existing site conditions, causing the
groundwater treatment to be ineffective.
Soil contamination required treatment by vacuum extraction, but the project specifications dictated
that soil be dewatered first. This would have required installing sheetpiling to support the required
Page I o/3
HOLLINGSWORTH SITE RE.IATION •
excavation and the collection, treatment and discharge of contaminated water. These operations
would have been very costly and impractical due to the proximity of the site to public traffic and a
business. The specified soil remediation method was determined to be technically and economically
unfeasible, and Westinghouse ceased on-site operations, demobilized and, for the next 18 months,
assisted the client with improving the design of the recovery wells and redesigning the groundwater
and soil treatment systems.
Upon remobilization to the site, Westinghouse installed three 60-foot by 6-inch and three 125-foot
by 4-inch recovery wells to remediate on-site contaminants. Westinghouse designed, constructed
and operated a groundwater treatment system equipped with two air stripping towers. A series
of 4-and 6-inch water main class pipe strings were installed to transport contaminated groundwater
from the recovery wells to the air stripping system. The groundwater, once treated, was carried by
the same pipeline to the discharge point. The system treated an average of 360,000 gallons of
contaminated groundwater_per day. Treated water was discharged into a separate aquifer through
two injection wells that Westinghouse installed to depths of 140 feet below ground surface.
The newly designed groundwater system was installed within two months of remobilization. The
entire system was totally automated and equipped with Westinghouse designed electronic
monitoring controls. The system was equipped with telemetry controls so that it could be operated
remotely from our Tampa Operations Center. With this system, Westinghouse was able to monitor
recovery well operation, air stripper components such as blowers and transfer pumps and we had the
ability to shut down or restarted the system in the event emergency situations occurred or following
power loss. The system was tested and proven during Hurricane Andrew in 1992, when
Westinghouse was able to remotely shut down and restart the system from our Operations Center in
Tampa, Florida.
The system could be contacted remotely, as well, by use of laptop computers. This system was
equipped with an emergency call back feature that automatically called the Operations Center in the
event of a pump shut down or equipment failure. When these voice call back occurred, the
Westinghouse project manager could call the system from any telephone line to trouble shoot the
system. Many times the system could be restarted over the phone, thereby reducing expensive
mobilization costs.
analyzer. Additional
Westinghouse determined that the most
cost-effective solution to soil
contamination was in situ remediation.
After receiving client approval,
Westinghouse designed, built and installed
an in situ soil venting system designed to
operate in saturated soil. A series of
wellpoints was installed and connected to a
manifold system and vacuum pump. The
unsaturated zone was treated and volatile
reduction verified using an organic vapor_
pumps then were installed to accomplish soil treatment within the saturated zone and to maintain
contaminant reduction within the unsaturated soil.
Page 2of3
HOLLINGSWORTH SITE RE.IA TION •
Installation of the underground utilities associated with the groundwater and soil treatment systems
required coordination with the City of Fort Lauderdale for permits, licenses, inspection and traffic
control. Following underground utility installation,' Westinghouse oversaw the replacement of the
roadway base and asphalt surface.
RESULTS
Westinghouse successfully performed all aspects of this difficult project, minimizing disruption and
inconvenience to traffic and adjacent businesses. T_he system pumped and treated over 200
million gallons of water during approximately 3 years of continuous operation. Through
complete redesign of the treatment systems, the project was conducted at considerable cost savings,
and the potential for exposure to physical and environmental hazards was effectively minimized.
Page 3 of 3
I
Appendix C
•
•
THE AMERI.N INSTITUTE OF ARCHIT8:TS
I.
A/A Document A310.
Bid Bond
Bond No. NIA
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, tha\ we
(Here insert tuU name and addrou ot legal tiUe of Contractor)
Westinghouse Remediation Services, Inc.
675 Park North Blvd,
Clarkston, GA 30021-1962
as Principal, hereinafter called the Principal, and
(Here insert full name and address or legal title ol Surety)
The Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania
70 Pine Street, New York. NY 10270
a corporation duly organized under the laws of the State of Pennsylvania
as Surety, hereinafter called the Surety, are held and firmly bound unto
(Hero insert full name and address or legal title of Owner)
R.F. Weston. Inc.
1880-H Beaver Ridge Circle; Norcross. GA 30071
as Obligee, hereinafter called the Obligee, in the ·s·um of Ten percent of bid amount
· · · ollars ($ 10% of Bid Amount l,
for the payment of which sum well and truly to be made, the said Principal and the said Surety,
bind ourselves, our heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns, jointly and
severally, firmly by these presents. '
WHEREAS, the Principal has submitted a bid for
(Here insert lull name, address and description of project)
Design. Install, and Operate a Groundwater Remediation System at the FC Site
Located in Statesville, North Carolina
NOW, THEREFORE, if the Obligee shall accept the bid of the Principal and the Principal shall enter into a _Contract
with the Obligee in accordance with the terms of such bid, and g·ive such1 bond or bonds as may be specified in the bidding
or Contract Documents with good and sufficient surety for the faithful performance of such contract and for the prompt
payment of labor and material furnished in the prosecution thereof, or iii the event of the failure of the Principal to enter
such Contract and give such bond or bonds, if the Principal shall pay to the Obligee the difference not to exceed the pe:-ialty
hereof between the amount specified in said bid and such larger amount for which the Obligee may in good faith ct1ntract
with another party to perform the Work Covered by said bid, then this obligation shall be null and void, otherwise to rP.main
in full force and effect. :
March 19 97
Westinghouse Remediation S rvices, Inc.
(Seal)
The Insurance Company of the State of
I '
~ Pennsylvania
J (SeaQ
(Wltness)
L,-'
Linda D. Gruwell, Witness Pamela L Nunez, Attorney-in-Fact
AJAOOCUMENTA310 • BID BONO• AJA®• FEBRUARY1970ED•THEAMERICAN '
INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS, 1735 N.Y. AVE.. N.W., WASHINGTON. 0. C. 20006
i ..
The Insurance Compa11y of the State of Pc.Ylvania
Principal Bond O!Ticc 70 Pinc Street, New 'l , NY 10270
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS:
.OWER OF ATTORNEY
No. o 1-13-07870
That The lnsur~rncc Company of the State of Pennsylvania. ;i Pennsylvania corporation, docs hereby appoint
---Leslie L. Rudat, Pamela L. Nunez, Christine A. llartun).!, James L. Bly, Linda D. Gruwell: of Pittshuri.:h, PA---
its true and lawful Altorncy(s)-in-Fact, with full authority lo execute on its behalf bonds. undertakings, recognizances and other contracts of indemnity and \Hitings obligatory in the nature thereof, issued in the course of its business, and to bind the company thereby.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, The Insurance Company of the State of Pcnnsyl\'ania has executed these presents
STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK)ss.
On this 11th day of Fcbmarv, 1997 before me came the above
named o!Ticer of The Insurance Company of the State of
Pennsylvania, 10 me personally known lo be the individual and
officer described herein, and acknowledged that he executed the
foregoing instmment and affixed the seal of said corporation
thereto by authority of his office.
this ll!.!! day of Fcbmarv, 1997
' f
= 0c/4/N'\ l, . Oa\'id J. Walsh, Senior Vice President t
CA~CL RAGAB
~Jot;:iry Pu~lic. Sr;i.1,1 of ~a..., York
N:1 C lrl.t-30520 \ 1
Ci;alif:ed in K::":,;: Co•..:nty
Commission Exoire~ Ne•,_ 13, _L7.f_ r
CERTIFICATE
Exci.:rpls of Ri.:solution a<lopll.:J hy r..hi.: Boan.I or' Dirr.:ctor:; or ·n1c In:.ur:mcc Company of the Stale of!\:nnsylvania, on May 18, 1976:
"RESOLVED, that the Chainnan of thi.: Board, the Pn:sit.knt, or any Vice Pri:siJcnt be, auJ hi.:n.:lly is, uutl1orizi..:J lo appoint Attomi.:y:;-in-Fact to ri.:prcsi.:nt and act for and on !xhalf of thi.: Company to exccutc bonds, undertakings, ri:cog.aizanccs anJ othi.:r contr..icts of indemnity and ,,ritings obligatory in the nature ti11:n:of, anJ to attach thereto the corporate seal of the Company, in lhr.:: tran:;action of its surety business:
MRESOLVED, tl1at the signaturi.:s and au..:stations of such olliccrs anJ thi.: sc..11 of the Comp..1ny may be allixcd lo any such Power of Attorney or to any catilicatc relating thcrdo by facsimile, and any such Pom,:f' of Attorney or ci:rtilicatc tk:aring such facsimile signatures or facsimile seal shall he \·alid and binding upon lhr.:: Company when so atlixed \\ilh respect lo any bond, undertaking, recognizance or othcr contract of indemnity or \\Tiling obligatory in I.hr.: naturc lhr.:n:of:
"'RESOLVED, that any such Attomr.:y-in-Fact <ldivering a sr.:crdarial certification that the foregoing rc:mlutions still be in r.:tfr.:~t may insert in such cr.:rtilication thr.: <late thereof. said <lair.: to be not later than the datt.: of delivery I.hereof by such Attomey-in-F:.ict."
!, Elizabeth M. Tuck, Secrdary of ll1e Insurance Comp:.iny of thi: Stalr.: of Pr.:nnsylvaniu, do hcrehy certilY th..it the forr.:going excerpts of Iksolution adopter.I by thi: Uoar<l of Dircctors of this corporation, uml thc Po\1.-cr. of Attomr.:y issur.:<l ptusuant thereto, arc tnie a11d correct, and Ll1at both thc Resolution :.ind thc Powcr of Attorney arc in full force and dkct. -
IN \VITNESS WHEREOF, I ha\'e hcrcunlo set my hand :.m<l allixc<l the focsimilc seal of the corporatio11
this 14th ""Y ot' __ Ma-=rcccc..h ____ . t '/ 9 7
Eli,atbcth M. Tuck, Secretary
Johnson & Higgins of Pen-lvania, Inc.
6 PPG Place, Suite 300
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 2-5499
412 391 5350
Fax: [phone]
lOHNSON
__&HIGGINS Established 1845
March 14, 1997 ,
R.F. Weston, Inc.
1880-H Beaver Ridge Circle
Norcross, GA 30071
•
Re: Contractor: Westinghouse Remediation Services, Inc.
Job Description: Design, Install, and Operate a Groundwater Remediation
System at the FCX Site located in Statesville, North Carolina
Estimated Contract Price: $250,000
Bid Date: March 19, 1997
To Whom it May Concern:
Westinghouse Remediation Services, Inc. is a valued surety account of The Insurance
Company of the State of Pennsylvania, a member company of American International
Group. We understand they are submitting a proposal on the above captioned work.
Based upon their track record of performance and strong financial position, we highly
recommend them to your Authority.
If performance and payment bonds are required, we will underwrite them when
contract terms are specified. This would include contract terms, bond forms, and
confirmation of adequate financing. B·ased upon past experience with Westinghouse
Remediation Services, Inc. we do not anticipate a problem in issuing any final bonds.
In the past we have issued bid, performance & payment bonds with limits in excess of
$5 million.
If we can provide you with any further assurances concerning our client's technical
expertise or bonding capacity, please do noi hesitate to give us a call.
Sincerely,
THE INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
{Jtx_,t\WJ.(, t ~ ~
Pamela L. Nunez
Attorney-In-Fact
236227.1
UNIS'!'}N
Ill IJIO ■•L IIIM
i I , ..
!
The Insurance Com pan~· of the State of Pc-·lvania
Principal Bond Ol1icc 70 Pinc S1rce1, New Y , NY 10270
.OWER OF ATTORNEY
No. 0 1 ·B•07X70
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS:
That The Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania, a Pennsylvania corporntion. docs hereby appoint
---Leslie L. Rudat, Pamela L. Nunez, Christine A. Hartung, James L. Bly, Linda D. Gruwell: of PittshurJ.!h;PA---
ils true and lawful Attorney(s)-in-Fact, with full authority to execute on its behalf bonds, undertakings, recognizances and other
contracts of indemnity and \\Tilings obligatory in the nature thereof, issued in the course of its business, and to bind the company
thereby.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, The Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania has executed these presents
this l!!h day of February, 1997
~0l~j~
/,, · ,Da,·id J. Walsh, Senior Vice President
STATE OF NEW YORK l
COUNTY OF NEW YORK)ss.
On this I Ith day of Februarv, 1997 before me came the above
named officer or The Insurance Company of the State of
Pennsylvania, to me personally known to be the individual and
officer described herein, and acknowledged that he executed the
foregoing instrument and affixed the seal of said corporation
thereto by authority of his office.
CArtOL RAGAS
Notary Pu':)!ic, St~ttl of No·.•, York
No. ClR.•5052011
Ci;a1:t:ed in K:r,;: Co~nt'/
Commiszion Ex~i:e~ No·,. 13, J3.!l r
CERTIFICATE
Excerpts or Rcsolution a<loptcd by thc Doard of Dircctors of ·111c Insurance: Company of thc State: of Pcnnsylvania. on May IS, 1976:
cl
"RESOLVED, that thc Chaim1an of thc Board, thc Prcsidcnt, or any Vic.:c Pn:siJcnt be, and hcrchy is, authorizcd lo appoint i\llomeys-in-Fact lo
rcprc:sent and act for and on behalf of the Company to executc bonds, w1Jertakings, rccognizances and other contracts of indemnity and \\Titings
obligatory in the nuture thereof, and to allach thereto thc corporate seal of thc Company, in thc transaction of its surety busincss:
"RESOLVED, that thc signaturcs and allcstations of such olliccrs and thc seal of the: Company may he allixcd to any such Power of i\llorney or to'any
certilicatc relating tJ1crcto by facsimik. and any such Power of i\llorncy or certificate bearing such facsimile signaturcs or facsimilc seal shall be \·~lid
and binding upon thc Company whcn so allixc<l \\ith respect to any bond, undcrtaking, rccognii' . .am::e or other contract of indcmnity or \\Tiling
obligatory in tht.: nature thcrcol:
"RESOLVED. that any such i\ttorncy-in-Fact ddivcring a s1.:cretarial c1.:r1iticatiOn thut thc forcgoing. r1.:solutions still he in ell't.:_yt may insert in such
c1.:rtifo::ation thc date tJ1crcof, said datc to he not lat';-=r than ~1c date: of delivery thereof by such Attorney-in-Fact."
I, Elizabeth M. Tuck, Sccrctary of ll1c Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania, do hereby certify that the foregoi1ig excerpts of Resolution
adoptcd by the Uoard of Directors of lhis corporation, and the: Power of Attorney issued pursuant thereto, arc truc and correct, am! that both the
Resolution um1 thc Power of /\ttomcy arc in full force and cffect.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hcrcunto set my hand and atlixed the facsimile seal of the corporation
this 14th day ot" March
Elizabeth M. Tuck, Secretary
. I
I ' I
I_
•
•
To: Gordon Dean
From: Doug Nelson
Date: March 7, 1997
•
Westinghouse Remediation Services, Inc.
Inter-Office Memorandum
RE: OSHA 200 Logs, EMRs and Hours Worked
•
Gordon, OSHA 200 Logs for 1994, 1995 & 1996 are enclosed. EMR and hours worked data are
listed below for the same years.
Year EMR* Hours Worked
1994 0.48 739.673
1995 0.39 784.536
1996 0.46 642.031
• Interstate EMRs
Bureau ol Labor Statistics • Log and Summary of Occupational
Injuries and Illnesses
NOT(: T1-tonn • ,____. b¥ P'vbl .. U• 11-681 .,.. _.. 1M a_.
inN ~II f Aforf,,_.. f.._.,19_.... ........
_.,_ti lnltw ___ ., ~-----of,...._,
rs. Po"'"''""~" on rtwothM lit# of form.I
.,_., -·· ,,...,., •. ,Na_ -... ......... -0.-ol ,._
•
RECORDABll CAKI: You .,. NQUlrwd to ...cord mlorm11,on 100u1 f'Ylll'\I o:cvo•
tlonll .,._.: ...,.rv l'l.00tatai oceuottlOMII in-: and tl'lo. not1!1~ cx:cuo,111on• -
)Yf'MI which invotw one or men of tN t0Uow'"9: lea CII COl'l'Cn:iul!Wtl. '"1rn:tion
ot worll or mouon. tr.,..., 10 •ncnhet 100. or ffl9dicel 1n11'"'9flt loNr tnll'I 1ir,t ■•di. " (S.N ct.finidOM .. ,,.. Of/W .. of form.I ---' Da:rlll'tlOft ot tntw, or 111-
..
U.S. o..,.n,.,,, of Labor
For Caten<:11r Vear 19 .:I.£ -.L.J_
♦
Comoar,v NI,,.. iAk.?L+i I\ £i_,, -,, , ~ ,, K,,,. •~A--f' I r.i't7 ~ "· ,c. s
Form ••oou,,,.a
0.M.8. No. 1220-0020
E111bll1Mten1 Nlffl4 1,·15 Pak t, D~• ,"'-,1 .. A, R de. l:
E11111111nm1n1 Ator .. , (' I 11 .-v c+ • .,, ~14. . ooz'
Ut11u Of Ind Ql,I\CClffM ot INJURT ype, l.-.1 of,_,. Ou._... el ILLNID
fetellt'-t NOIIIUII ln11JIIII Typeol Ill-f1t1Utlel Nont1111PIII...-
Ent•• Ent• Ent:• fit11 Nnw or inlU1I, EM• regular )Clb 11111. not Entw d~ In ""'!di Ent• I bf .. t clt,ct1pt10n ol tht ffl11,11''1' or 1lln .. i:.n,wry 1niur1.111 vmn L::·.t vVOf•a.avs 1 •ni11n11 CHECK Only Ont Column to, Eadl tune■ !tin .. 111,....._ Whl'I Lmt Wortldr,t 111,....
nondllP(+-
'"''"' --... ,
lec:111\sH .....
s-etafl• .... --'"'°""·
-
IAI
/(,, -2..
'?.-3
q
q
Cl
q{..-L{
6~5'
'6-G
(,-7
6-'6
6-9
16-/0
16-(/
Ma,Jdn'. ,niddlt initial. IHI...,,,._ ICIMtY tin"IPIOY .. Ml CMJ• N emplc,.-.. II ,_,left'I'
torml,. wMl'I ff'ljYfld Of II lfflPIGY9d Of.~
_, at Ill,.., In N ... nc:9 of._,,,.~ to
of I tOffNII 1'tll, tntllr I briel wtllcl'l~ll...,,.S.
dllchPdOn of IN 9'11PIOY .. -■ ewen ~ WfflDOnritt ........ Wor'lr.mf in lflOCNI' dlpert-
ffil'llt 11 tN HIN ot tftlurv
or ill,,.._
"''.~, . ... ., .. ' ... .. ,., ·.:;!I ICI -'• .. IOI !El ., ~t-:: ___ .'. ·-·. ' '
J../ tJ ' :.~. A1-h,,, -1..,,
-i,Jz '&' ·11e.; tL, r')..,l,,,t:! e 1,.1 ' I I \f',-IA,A\ft O"' F=\ 01"·• & ~
r./ Ir, ~~ R,;, ~r·,11. 'P.r~,er-+ <,.-,,,J:..,J i=='f;. \i--~11 . r,
t./,?, . R,,,,, i?11.11(// I e v .,_j F,.w":> fh--1 · r IPt,·l.,..J./.,l· ~
t./;q I~~ L ,, Ma ,-J ;,_, <' ,.,.,,,.r,i; c:.,-., 11=="/ r.r; Ah
r-/h{) tT,;; uu, < J.1Jf ,rJ.u / 'rr:;,,,/_,,,,; ,:,,,,,,, pj,, . /1 ,,
1-,/n . 11 ,cute Bonk11 ff, Eq,.,; ,.) Ot:>e,-, )::>/4}; 'I
I I
7/,2. Te~e: l',t'w •,ft:-<,_ . '
. l~-x.i. ,..S.t\ ,--· ,Fk,-:,.,.J"'
r ft< 6' 0 H. vv'C I I 1-.!., P.,;u1 >;:,. i\...., ,._j R,, r , ,!Jc
?A; K i,J "\ \L. e/"' h i e {!'. l,r,J,( /(. / q Y', \ A ,1v1;tr1,,,,
\\ j I A-. ?'ieder1, _,__ I . I~, ,,A·,r·,,. 'Av'!L1; ch, -. I
I
' I
;
I
i
I
···-::_·:.-, .. :'.•:···., . :: ....
tnd indim11 lhe """ or s-ru ol boclY 1lltc1.S, """' I
~nt• DATI Enler, Ent• 1 Entw num-
t d•ti,, CHECK CHICK it .,., .,
I 11n1uv lnjwrv ,~ DAVI ... ,,
""°"'" 1/CMYII dlvt --~ ci,.,.11., I ,om IYIIIY trom
worll,
I wafll. or ~,.,.01
TvPCII en11,n tor 1Pl,1 column moqri1 t:,e
~./day/yr,
.. trlCltO
-""PuUIIIOfl ot 1st 10,nt riqM lorthnqer, f-oR
S111,n ol I~ b.Ck: CofllKI cl•m•hus I ~ctllny.
on both Nl'd1: El«:Uocuhon-ooc,y_ ~btltl. . ' : f II "' 131 141
IFI ',
·. 1~,-w,.tJA'< ·-~, -~--· ...
: .. :,. .... ,._. 7
~u,r-,c,l~erv_±:1)-~I
' I .o ,. V I/ It./~
,.. .rt . . I ✓ v r,, U~11lv, R. Le,:,., I 3
Spro.·,..,~d r+-.ai.,\.,,)-.:, I ✓ '
S'f""'""; ,,e~ r 15/ttt ~"' Ide. ' ✓ I
feJ. -1,-l.,, ,~ 0 L,;,:..tt+-o ~
A~51'1u 7 ,1,, ' \
I \ \
i~/~r, ' I .,J ·-
I J\/ ' ' ~
iP'f);,;1,,,-, l vy ' ' I
I I A,·,,,,,,., _f_ vv . '
'Al fus,J x,,i,.,, '5ee St,;,~ i ' I I
i7,,J•1Lrn r;,;J,,,\'el \,,,ow I I '
I ' I I
I --..
I I ' I I
' ' '
' I .
I I I ' I
I I
I ·--I
I . . I
I : .
I ,.
' ' .~ .... ~•·· :·.: .. ·: I.·:,, .: .. ·.-.=·:'''·:"::::.:"-r":','.=.-"··::
\::'::_ !.~~~ {itl~oacsmsr
.,··>-.. ••Gt~·.· _...l 0 ; 4. ' 2. :iL/P,
I C1n,t.c.a11on to• 4.n~;a1 Sum,.,,vv Ttlu11 Bv
OSHA NO. 200
0 ~
Whhov1 Loft fSN oi,,.,,lda of,o,m lolr.nnlNrlon, Rtlat.S w---
WOrlildr,t OliOM" .... tffWtlN,._I
w.,......,
Entw rw.,m-Ent91' 1 CHICK Entw DATI Entart Entar • Entw nu~ Enf'lt' ""'""" Entw1 CHICK .... It no 1ntrv-•• of CIMth . ""•c• CHICK If .... , tllrat If no....,,..
DAVI of fl'mt1nc:a► ! .. ! i I lfllln.a 111 .... 1~ DAVI..,.,-DAYI of fflldlk'lco►
,.,,.,.., wmne 1 or2 • i ·¥ a l ! Im-YO"'-CS.VI from...-. UfflN I or 8. --l'IIOf'tK,,.,._ b.11 tto1 lnjurv 1 § • ~ t • ! , Ii l I --~,,om --,,.,. i " ·-,. 1"Koro-,11 I! I ~ ·" t • WOrll,Of -·· ,,.,,
• O.llntid I t i g iS . i ' i
c1.,..ot -· l! ~! ~1 !g ,.,..,...,
~ :, -, li MeJAy/yr. _.,.
; ! a; ; . ;i actlvltV.
0 -~ . e. ~ 0 ii c5 i Otboth.
1•1 1e1 171 181 191 t101 1111 ll21 1131 ... .,
1,1 di)) kl IOI 1,1 '" 1,1 -.... --· . , __ .,:·.,, .. : 1'; f'I• . •;:!-".C:. -. ,.,,,•;! .... ") l-°$l'k~;;_ Vf1').J." .~· ~:"'l',"rft-., ~v, '"!•' '", .
·-~ -.. -., '. ~: .. I
' s-I ' -I .s I
/() I
, " • .... -
·, '( ... ·::v I" .... ~ .,.
... .. ., -~-·-• vi ~ ,.,,, v
\ ' ..f"'_
vr I ~--"'V v 2-.. . /
I I '
.,
v,.. i '· ~ -v •, --
i v: ' i./
I I I I
; I I : !V v
I I I ; ;
✓ I '
I : i ' I I
' I I I I I I
I I I I
I ' I ' I I i I ! I
• I ' ' ' ' i ' I
I I I '
I i I ' ' ' I i
I ! I I I !
I I ' I I I !
i
i
I I I
! ' ' ' ! I
I I I I
t-{ OiC:i \ I () \ q
:2.0i 2... /, o,o,o: l 7
' i 0 ' I
/;, r'z/1 2LI! (' / /_j_ r.u,. fU $ de/ ,u ;., ; si@io r :>11• 1_ls/v
I _o; -'
C OSHA No. 2C( POST ONL HIS PORTION OF THE LAST PAGE NO LATER THAN FEBRUARY 1.
~
• •
Bureau of Labor Statistics
U.S. Ollper1111111' of Labor ♦
Log and Summary of Occ_upational
Injuries and Illnesses
For Calendar Year 1995,_ -Lat.V
NOTE.:
--, .. ,.._
Em•• -· ... , ... --...... ... ,
fadlft.11e
""" ,..,_, .... --,..,,.,
,···
IAI
95 -1
95 -2
9 5-3
9 5-4
9 5-5
9 5-6
9 5-7
9 5-8
9 5-9 -9 5-10
9 5-11
9 5-12
9 5-13
9 5-14
9 5-15
9 5-16
9 5-17
9 5-18
TMI forM iii~.,,._._ Uw 11-6N end_.. bl llWII RECORD"8LE CA.IE&: .'(CM~ 19Q1.11,-G 10 rw:o,o 1ntonna11on aoout ewrv occuo•
tlon■·dlie1h: ......., ""01"1'-Uil or::cuo.uonlll in,._; .,a th~ nont1ta1 OCC1.10111on• -
juntl wf'lich involW ~ Ot mON of tl"9 foOowin9: 1011 ol COl'ltCicull'lnl, rwunclion
WESTINGHOUSE REMEDIATION SERVICES ••= .__
iftthe ____ ,_,.,..,_ , ..... _...-"",..
_..,_n WIUIII ..,...._, dtatioN ... ....,.... ot p,watU&
r;,,:,:;;,.::,.;;:,.:: ..... =:0:;-, ••-=-~~-~~==---"=-=====...::::=~=, ==-----------------------10.M.B. No. 1Z20-0029
(S-po,flnf ,.,,.,ffMfla on rtw ot!Wr •• of lonn.J ~-=,::d:::.°:·:.-:::,.;:::,::,:.~· er matic .. tteltmenl tothllr tl\atl lir,,t i"1I ..... r,;;,:;;, .. :;;,;;;,.;; ... ;;;~;;;;-, .... :;;,;;,";;.~6:':7ii5f°PPiiARKiRi<'NNCO>IRI'HU1HEBilL}1'!Di5:.7BiiLDGJSG':.7F=':-. -;,--r: ,,o;:m~ro,~•,;-iun~::.-:mm,!T-----------1
-·· , ........
O,..ol ··-Ent•
Mo./Glv.
181
1/10
2/3
2/18
2/27
2/28
3/3
1/7
5/25
6/1
6/20
6/22
6/23
6/27
6/27
8/11
8/29
9/18
9/19
Em• lirn NIN Of initial.
tNdcS)e init.i, Ian !WM.
10
L, _, son
J. Mitchell
J. Cruz
B. Brumley
M. Manzanares
D. Springer
bttr regular tot, 110,. "°'
ICllritl' tmP'OYN -• 0-•
fonnint fWMft lnj111ad or It
_, or IIIN& In IN llbNnc:e
of • formal tide, eni.r • b!Wf
c1eencn1on or 1N emplO'f'N't ........
· (01
Technician
Foreian
Technician
Equip. Oper.
Foreian
Foranan
Ent• d.,,.,.,,.._.. In wtl.:fl
IN ernohw• • ,..,lefty
.,nplc,v9d 0# • dlCr1PUOn
ofno,INIIWOt11pCaWto
whk;tl ~ II .....,.,0,
IY9C\dlOu9f'ICWi:OO•,tot
wo,lllnQ WI~__,.
men1 It tN tim. of lfltu,y
or Ill,.._ · ·
IE!
Phillv
Tampa
Philly ·.' ~ .
Murray
Atlanta .
E.llenl ol Incl OU\C-111 INJURT
r.,,.,::,.::,.:;:,_::--"T.N:':~::,::.,::.,::.,:::,":::,,,::,:-----------------lc:-,-.,.-,-:,c:,.c-,"------------r.,c-.,-.,-.. ,-,_--,-,,N,-on-lC-m-.-:,c-lh_WWW _______________ _
Ennlf I bftei dffCl'IOtlOn ol 11,, if'li\UV Of ,unen
Ind inchcate ,,.. ~nor pant ot bOdY 1tl11CtN°
, I
• ' I I
Abrasions to Knees . I I
I
3
5 20
V 4
R. Elbow Strain I ..-
I .?:"
Back Strain
CHECK Only Ona ColurM lor £,eh IIIM•
fSN OD'MI' th# Of fOffl' for Ntmlnn/OIW ..,....,.,.,, ,,..,,.,..,
'
!
I
! I
' I
'
Laceration R. Thumb I V \ ~ ' ~ ' I
'
1101
Ent• num-Entar nurn-
t.1' of m,or
0AYI_.,-DAYlof
from ..,.._ fWfl"lr:1#
1111
----"'·
1121
l!ntsaCMIClt
lfno....., ... ....... _
""'"'' ore.
llll
·:-:.• , .
n n, _ _, I. I ,.. . -.J ·-""'--\ .._. -
l..._..ll~:d------l_j)ec:bIJ..L::.iar1-__ -l--ll..tl..EuitaL----L' ~5.:-,r.c--i;•L' -tle-·d..-'JTc...._.l!•,nj -'c.-111 oe...----1-'----l--...1-, ..... ~'--➔---+---+-----1----;.....-1---1--~e--l---l.:''--l-~' ._....::=---1---~---'-l-----l----+----
' ' ,_,: __ "-"'-1--"---
V" I
~ .
M. Terry Technician Tampa_
w. Brooks Technician Tampa
w. Rehm Technician Philly
J. Beyer Technician : Philly
I
s. Skul:irroski Foranan 11-'.urray
D. Bryan Technician ! Atlanta
.
L. McCall Equip. Oper. j Philly·
w. Brooks Technician \Tampa
N. Barney Technician !f>11.lrray
s. Woods Technician · Chicago
.
M. Copeland Sales Mgr. Pittsburgh
\Stitches to Forehead I &/ ' .. \. -
Poison Ivy I
' I I ~ '
I I ✓ ✓ I 10 ·n , i I i
______ l ____ _.; __ ---'---''-----~-+--'---;---'---'--'--'---.....J----+--1-----+---+---+----
R. Hand '
0
\
i I
• v '
I I
i
' I
' . ~ i : I
I I ' !
IBroken R. Snall Finger I
\Stitches to R. Index ?i~ger
:Muscle tear Rt. Ann j
Knee Strain
IPuncture L. Foot
Broken Finger
I -
Punctured lung
I
I
' ! I I I v I I I I
-..
I i I
'
I I ✓ I I I I
' a/i ✓ ! 28
I
I I I !
I ✓i ' i ! 1 '
' I I I
I
I I
i ✓ i ' !
-i ' ✓ j
I
I
I i
l 10 ' : ' ! l ✓i ----------,---1-------------;.--+---+----i--------
l i ' i i ; 9 --1.l_4_..l:_4_6_;L_.9f,6A1-.,,·= ~~11'+'-----'--.L ,, __Jl __ _;____1. __ ....L._....L. __ j__ _ _j_ __ -f\_;::.1~_
Cerhhcai,on<.1,\om~•ISum,.,a,vfo!,1lsBv /b/. ~ II Clfl T,tle. H&S Admini5 t.rator ::,,11 /Q,~9/qr
OSHA No. 200 € OSHA No. 2r, POS; 0~ THIS PORTION OF THE LAST PAGE NO LATER THAN FEBRUARY 1. ' .
Bureau of Labor Slatisllcs • • Log and Summary o1 Occupational
Injuries and Illnesses
NOTt:
--, .. ... _
EM• I -· ...... --... ,
t1cUlut1 --,._, .... --·-·
TMI fOf'"' •, ...... ti\' Pvbl .. Uw 11~ ~ _. bt 11.-; inlhe_,..,.__,...,,...,.. f.._.•-"'11N11~.-_.,_...lftfflt.,..__.ctD11DN.,.._of~
IS. Poft/nr ,.quitWnMa o,t tM orh# ,;m of fo,m.J
RECORDABL£ CAIi.i: Yau.,.. ~•IWO 10 .-:oro ,nfonn•hon ll)Oul -l"W' OC'Cl.O•
tlonal cl!Ndl; ..,.,v ,u:infUIJ"OCCUO.IICNII Ill-; ana U'loa non1,ui oa:uo111on• -
)lll'MI wnicn invOho9 one or mCN ol 1N lol'°"'tnQ: 1011 ot concu1u_., ,.,,,oct,on
ot won ot motion, lra'lt,_ 10 «IO'lhet 100. or rneoical tr .. tment lotrier 1n1n tir11 ,,111.
rs., dslinidOM ort rM • .,,., ,JdJI ot fonn.l
Douot ....... ...... .. _
£,uw ... .-.
·:,·•,
EM• llrn l'IIITle or Initial.
rniddltl lnit .. , lltt ,.,_.
Ent•, • .., lcb mi., not
ICliri'tl'~ .. -•W·
f0tml111 .,,_., lnjund or 11
-• ol 111 ..... In 'IN~
of • fonn.f dtll, entat' I bri■f
dner.pdon of.,_ lfflPloYN'1 ........
Entll' d~ In Mlk:h
1M en'IPIO'YN II t-.,Yrty
~ond or I dlCtiPUOn
of~~'°
,which~II....,.._
1¥91'1 dtoU1'\.tlfNNH•ilY
'llfOlk"" In ll"I01tltt' ...,,.
men1 111he HIN of "'lurv
OI illnltl.
En111' 1 bf1■t d11Ct•011on ct 1t111n1vrv or ,llnfll
11'1:1irdK:8111t11 pan o, pant cl bodV 1llec11d.
.. ·,. ':
Tvoic.11 en1u"' 10( ll'l•t column m,qh1 DI
Amputation of ht 101n1 u9ht fo,111~.
., .. Strlln of~ t,«k; Con1K1 dll'fflllllll
on bo1h hl1"1:11: e1ecu0e11110n-bodv .
. •~1Jr:..• •. , , .. :~
I ..
U.S. Dopao a,.,t of Labor
For Calender Year 19 f 5
♦
/,,-,(+.,-; ol,c'-''>C ,<p,_.,,,-,-tl;,,/.-io~ "'--,,'('..$, ,.,.,,...,_
~.~.~ .. ~ .. :;;::,.....,==,~.~.~-~-----C:.."'--""'-'-!..J-/'f-J"'-'"-"~=-....l.:J.!:::!'.'!:.1..C..U.'..L.~.J..IJ<'..l:.!...-..2cli.L.;::C!. __________________ -lo.M.B.No.1220-00N
f,. 7) j/t7,-.-(/
bt.nt 01 lftCI Ouu:oma 01 INJUAT
f1t .. lt1N Nonltlll lnlUIIH
lnjvriu
Without Lofl 1-----,----..,,----,,.-----,-.. ..,.
151 ce,
-· Cf{; "1 ~ v
v
v
' · I
I •
I
-.J
.
CHECK Only Ona Column lor heh IIIM■
(Sw Otlt# ,Jm of fonn ,0, rwntln•ffo,w -~..,.., ,,..,,.,..,
,,, dbl '" ,., ,,, Ill
I
]. -,
I
I
I
\
Ill~
' ---.----.----.-----,w-...
" --
Entll' num-
""•' DAYt ... y
lrom~.
(11)
Enr.r num-
t., ot
DA YI ct ----,.,,
1121
Ent•1CMICK
lfno-crv.,..
n'aillncot-
ufflN I ore.
·:.
11:11
I ,~
----1----4----------+-----------+---------"---------------,'1-----1--..... ' I i
I I
.-!
'·. .
I
' I I •
. ' ; ' I
-·-· '-----~---'------'----'-----1----;.-.:..._-1--__;_-.L...-+---+---+---+---+---+---
I i I I
i i I
' ' I I
I I I I
I i ' :
' •
' :
' ' '
: I ' i i
'
! .. I ' i I I i I ! i I
I
I
--~---+---------+---------------------------,----
I
' -··-
i ' I I I I I ' I
OSHA No. 200
'
i '
I I
I I
i '
I I
.
' I
I
I
I '
'
I I
' I
i
I ! ' !
I-
' ' •
I
I ti
' '
' ! i '
' I i I I
I • !
I ' ' '
:
' ' i
' ! I I
'
·••-.. • <l> . . . · L> '"'~:::::."'.'-__.,,l () , c1 : i-/ : 10 , r6 : ;tiff t i i ' ' i I ! i
I Cer11hc11oon C,1 Ann..,,, s..,m,.,a•v Toul\ Bv __,./2~,Ll/,.,J,.l,,.· ''I'' 7/L../A,_,J, 1,1/-,,::._,_c=-'1-'-.H--'-___ r,,1, _ /If ~-&1{,,1 I /1 ; f~ 'i-or-
~ OSHA No ,c, POS; olt. Y THIS PORTION OF THE LAST PAGE NO LATER THAN FEBRUARY 1,
I
,
Bureau cf Labor Statistics
Leg end Summary cf Occupational
Injuries and Illnesses
• •
11m.__■,__W,.....,_11 ... _._llllk-
ilt.. . -·~f-----------~ _ ........ ...._ .......... __. ......... AICORDMLE CAUa: You a,w ,-qu"9CI to iwcon:I .rtfonnltion libCUI ew:rt oa:ua,.,.
· tlanll ._.; ~ ncntsaf CCI> c cc• •~ and ~ nont.UII o:cuoatioMt ~
JwW which lnYotw c,,. o, rnon of uw toOo,win;: tea of COl'CiCll.lrllll, rwstne1ion .-.
of woril Ot' rnoaon. tn,wt9, 10 al01tWf lcllD, or l'fllldCIII trN.....n lolhar '1\an tim ..cit.
,s.. dni,tldottl -N .,_..,,. ot ,.,,,,_, ,s-,,_.,,.qw;,_,u.-aw-,.,_,,,,,ollotrAJ ---.. ----0,..al -e,,_.• E,a,
fllWIINPI~ Ma.Jdttr,. ---.... _..,, ------
181
1/17 ;t:i'l7
2/B ~210
3/1 ·3;11
3/22 3/22
4/11 4/11
4/27
4/27
4/27
4/28 4/28
5/15 5/15
5/16 5/16
6/6 6/6
6/8 6/8
5/13 5/13
6 16 6 16
7/11 7/11
7/20 7/20
10
P. Slater·
·-s. Baum
R\ Jennings
s. Lant>
o·: Taylor
G. ott
J. Es sito
T. Milewsl<i
c. Burgin
c.o. Weigle
T. Milewski
T. Milewski
N. Chandler
R. Bauer
C. Th son
s. Hill
M. Zoost
0 ...
Ef'ltS NIIUls tab lhll, IIDI ea..,.,,..,,...., ... . .._.. ..... ....,.et
maC of 11 ..... 1ft .. __,_
of• hMfflal tttlt, ...... briil'f
....,_.. of 1M ....,. .• -
Technician
Tia!chnician
Technician
Acct. Clerk
Proj.
Equip.
·Technician .
Technician
Technician
Proj. Manager
Technician
Technician
Technician
Technician
Technician
Technician
Technician
Da -
Ents d_,u,•:akl ...... Int~-.......,
~a, .... lptkwi
offlOflMI----•
whldl.....,. ..........
..-1MUIII'. = QOC&ilt
wo,alnflft ..........
"'-'1 .. U.Ullllof~ ... -
Ill
Lakeville
Lakeville
Lakeville
Atlanta
Tampa
Baton-·Rou e
F
Florence
Ta
Chicago
Florence
Florence
Florence
Florence
Chica C
Chicago
Ent• I br-4 d9Kripcio,n ot Ow lniurt or lllnta
and indkate ft SW1 Ot' C-U of bcldy effectllCI,
TYD4ca1 ernr-tor thil coturnn mqlt bll:
A111PMUonof Ill joint ngfn torl'flngilr:
Sl,aift of lowS beet: Conucl dlnNtitll
on DOlh Nfllta: EIC1rocuuon-body.
lfl
Bruised
Bruised fi s R Hand
Inhalation of unknown
Broken R Wrist
Laceration left arm
Inhalation of un
Inhalation of
Inhalation of
Left ankle s rain
e
Puncture Left Arm
Laceration R small fin
Knee Strain-Left
Back Strain
Laceration R Knee
2nd d ree burn rt. w
Rib muscle pull
♦
For Calend1r Year 19 ~ -

l

.t.1-
WESTINGHOUSE RE'l1EDIATION SERVICES, INC. ••=-
rr.::::,.;::,..""..,_=::,-:-::::::----------====-'-'-..c..c=-"="'-''--==------------------io.M.a. No. 122'0,,,()()3
675 PARK NCRTH BLVD. CL
1.1.lfflil ot 111d Outr•• ot lNJUIIY
'
,111Ut• Norhlt11l lntu11M
I
I s
4r
I
I
lnfyrlal
1---.-----,-----,----i-,_ --
✓
v
V
Entw1
CHICK H
lnjur, ..
l:ll
....
t,om ..
Ermr ru~ Ent:111' num, Ens• CHICK
bat of ta' of H flOefflrV Wilal
DAVI-, DAYlof nwdlff\~
,,_ ...a. IW016W umN 1 or 2
95
wort «rlr-· bu11N lnJt,,v
,r,. la l'9COf'dllba
• dsflt'lld -
3
✓ 17 10
11
,./
✓
v 1
V 1
✓ 3
3
2
4
11
ypeoHII,._
CHICK 01\ty Ona Coklmn tot bah II.,_ 111,-
fSW olMI" ,_of'°""' lol CMINiwoaa ,i-.i
o,,,..u,ou:a ~ ·-~---.----,----r-----i=..""'
1 ... .....-............
sot bal'of
DAYI...,, OAYlof -------,.,,
(11) 1121
1
-·-""'°...,_ _., .... ~····
J
1111
"-""""'
; ·.-:+t~-J-~ :_~~~ .,,,.,fif.,.Jif.-·.':!. ..... ~~, , .... •.•·····;~~½~:,:~;} 11 5 117 4 1
OSHA No.200
0 " f OSKA NO. lOC Y THIS PORTION OF THE LAST PAGE NC LATER THAN FEBRUARY 1.
Bureau of Labor Statistics •
Log and Summary of Occupational
Injuries and Illnesses •
NOTE:
--... ... .-
Em••
l'IDndupU-
"''"' --....
ladllme ..... .. -.... -~ _., ·-·
. '"'
8/25
8/22
Thlf fOt'ffl it, ... .,,.. bif Public I.II• 111-681 Ind_,. be It ..
l"the •tort,-..,... F.._.•IIWiMIM...ipaat °'",_ .. In the ----of dtadoM--of ......... (S. po,r/nf r«141/,.,,_r, Oft rM om# iide of form.I
RECORDABLE CA&EI: You ..-. 1'9QU1recl 10 rvcord 1nf0rm111on about everv occuo•
tlonal dNltl; ~~hita ~uonet ill-.: .-.d tho. nonl1t11 oxvo1uona1 ~
)u,._ which ltlV'Oht9 oiw ot mora of u. foUo,,,lno: 1011 ol cOl"IICiOJ.,_, '"tric1lon
of won: or motlOn, 1rand..-10 .,othef job, or meclic1I trHtn"lent lolher man lit1t 1i~.
,S. t»llnldotw o,, IN ortwrllf#ol ton,,,J -·· ,......, ..
an.of ,._ ..... ... .-.
181
8/25
8/22
9/12
Em• Urn ,.~ or lnltlal,
middle lnhiaJ, lalt ,.,..,.,
ICI
L. Mathis
M. Spindel
D. Th
OcwputkN;
Ent• r.guLw tab tltle, not
KlMfv 9ffiP40'fN Ml PW•
lormlnt wfWI lnJvr-.:i or It
on.I of lllnna. In the tlbNnct
of • formal dtll. en• I bri■I
dllcriPdon o_f th■ l!TIPIO'f'N' t ..,_
IOI
Technician
Technician.
rato
Ent• d..,..-unent In which Ent• I bt'i-1 dnc,iption ol th■ mjury or illMG
th■ 91'1'1P40VN II ,..,1a,1y 1N:1 lndlc:at1 thl o-n or"'"' of body 1ll1Ctai,
~ or I dlcrlptkWI
of nonnal worq,1 .. to
whlchMIPIOVNll...-.d.
""" thOwtfl tlffll)Ot9rily
woriting ln ■nothlt dl0en-
lMl'l1 11 th■ tWN of lnlurt
or Ill,.__
'.<;hrt. ~' :,~ ,; IEI
Chica 0
Utah
, .. ,, ...
Lakeville
Typical er1tr1n for th11 column rntght be:
Ampu11uon ol 1 n joinl ri9hl to,1lit'1Q«;
S1r1in ol to-b.c:11: ConlKI der~l•IIS
on bo1h hlln:lt: Elactrocutoon-boclv. ·
IFI
2nd ree Burn R
Bruised Rib Ca e
Bruise & Lacerations
U,a Depa bi IOI it of Labor
' I
For Calendar Year 19
♦ 94
CamponvN•-WESTINGHOUSE REMCDI/\1'ION SERVICCS, INC. '•=---.-.,=,."•"n",.,,,,.=oc,:s, •"un=,_:_:;:_c..:.c_ ________ _:_c..:._:_c_ _____ __;_ ________________________ --IO.M.B. No. 1220-0JZ1
E1labll1ttm1trUACd11H 675 PARK NORTH BLVD .. CL/\Rl(STCN , GA. 3002
F11■11tlel N011l,t1I lnlurl ..
lnfu0,,1 With Lest WcrkO•v• 1n,u,111
\---,...----..----,-----!Without Lon -.....
Ent••
CHICK If
lnfury i~
-wotwa dlVI
■wav from
wort.
131
5
Ent• nurn-Ent• num-
ber o1 ber ot
DA YI...,. DA YI of
from ...... ,wtrlcred
117
l
"'°'* w:tw-'"·
151
44
15
4
3
Enter I CHICK
H' no antrv...,,..
n"C•lnc:o\.
Uffln■ 1 o, 2
but 1111 lnlt,iry
It t9COl'Cllbll
■ aafln■d -..
181
, llrtWII of, arN10u1Nfflt of ILLNID
F11alhl-■ Nonf11a6 Ill,....
CHICK Only Ont Column lor bet, lllnns llln■-llln■■N Whh Lon Worlldr,1
,S.,. orMr tJdl of fOtffl tor e.mln1do,w R11t-tm
,Hmt.,.,t rrwv,.,._,
Ent• DATI En•r 1
o1 d•th. ICllt ,_
• •• da'(IIOf
1'91ttlctad
1:-:-..,,..,....,~....,~'"'"'' ~~=-~~181 (11 !bl (cl ldl (1) ltl I )
...
a:tlvlty. .......
191
4
Enttr■
CHICK If 111.--,~
'WOtwldavl
■wevtrom -··
(10)
Ent• num-Ene■r num-
ber of tit, of
DAVI ... y DAVI of
trom....:,n. ~
1111
·r
--""·
112}
l
!ntw • CHICK
If noentrYw-■
IT-.delnco\.
Ufflftl I o, 8.
1131
-... , , ' ..
9/28 '9/28 A. Technician. Philly Lumbar Strain & R Brui~t 11 11
10/7 '10/7 D. Joiner Technician Chicagc Momentary unconscious
.-1
..,
10/20 10/2 D. Olewinik. Technician Phill Strained Back _I
10/31 10/3 M. William Technician Tampa Laceration Left Hand I 2
12/19 12/1 K. Wagner Technician Baton Rouge Cervical Strain _l 2
I
OSHA No. 200 THIS PORTION OF THE LAST PAGE NO LATER THAN FEBRUARY 1.
Appendix E
•
•
• •
APPENDIXE
CRITICAL PATH METHOD SCHEDULE
The attached schedule was created in Primavera SureTrak version 1.5 and assumes a
contract start date of May 27, 1997. The indicated durations were taken from Table 4-1,
Remedial Action Schedule, of the Solicitation. Most of the optional bid items are not
shown for clarity of presentation. This schedule can be easily revised and/or updated on a
weekly basis. The schedule can also be resource loaded and a variety of reports produced
as needed.
• • · 1997 . . . 1998
~gt Description . A JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV i DEC . ·JAN FEB MAR APR MAY ' JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT
11000
i1010
11020
[1030
Contract Award
Submit Draft HASP/QAPP/Pump Test Work
Plan
Submit Final HASP/QAPP/Pump Test Work
Plan
HASP/QAPP/Pump Test Work Plan Approved
'"104-o--~-7ln-s~ta~ll~T~e-s~t w=e~ll_a_n~d~C~o-n~du-c~t~P~u-m-p~T~e-s-t----1
1050
1060
1070
1080
1090
1100
1110
1120
11130
i
11140
f 1150
1160
1170
1180
1190
1200
1210
1220
1230
1240
1250
Complete Pump Test
Submit Draft Remedial Action Work Plan
Receive Draft Remedial Action Work Plan
Comments
Submit Final Remedial Action Work Plan
Receive Remedial Action Work Plan Approval
Install Extraction Wells and Treatment System
Initiate Performance Demonstration
Submit Performance Demonstration results
Begin Base O&M Period
Submit As-Built Drawings
Base O&M and Monitoring
1st Quarter Sampling
1st Quarter Report
2nd Quarter Sampling
2nd Quarter Report
3rd Quarter Sampling
3rd Quarter Report
4th Quarter Sampling
4th Quarter Report
Complete Base O&M and Monitoring
Train Susequent Operator
2602091623300714212804111825010815222906132027031017240,1081522290512~92602091623020916233006132027041118~50108152229061320270310172431 0714212805121
♦ Contract Award
' ' ' '
: • sutimit"Drafl HASP/OAPP/Pump Test Work Plan;
~ S~b~it ~ina\ H~S~/~P~/Pu:mp:Te~t ~o~ Pl~n . . .
: ♦ HASP/QAPP/Pum_p Test Wo_rk Plan Approved:
. . '\:
Install Test Welf and Conduct Pump Test ,.. '.Ji-5 /); :
• •
1998 . 1999 , i 2000 .
NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT ' NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL U
2602091623300714212804111825010815220108152229051219260310172431071421280512192602091623300613'202704111825010815222906132027
0
3
1
0
1
7
2
4
3
1
0
7
1
4
2
1
2
8
0
~
1
3
2
0
2
7
0
3
1
0
1
7
2
4
0
1
0
8
1
5
2
2
2
9
0
5
1
2
1
9
2
6
0
3
1
0
1
7
2
4
3

' i ' /
i ' : ' ' !
I
' i --•-
I
' ' ' ' . .
f .. : .. : ... : ... : ... : .. : ... :
i an~ T~eat_me~t s.yst~m :
' . 1nitiate Performance Oemon~traiiori
I . . . . . .
\ • Sutimit:Perlorinarice 'oe~oristr~tio~ re~ult:s
' I·
I :
I : ' ' ' ' i ' 1 --
!
~ S~bn:iit ~s-~uilt, Dr~wi~gs: . .
'g 1 St Quarter ·saffipling
+ 1st Oua'rte RePori
' ' ' ' ' 11 ~nd _au~rte~ S~rnp_ling.
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' . ' ' ' ' . ' ' ' . ' . .
-,---,-
. . . . ·:· --: 11 j,Cf au,i'rte·r samPiifl9_:_ -
♦ 3rd Ouclrtei-RE!port
: I:
. Base O&M and Monitoring
. . . : ■ 4_th <;)uarter Sa~pling:
: + 4th Quarter Rep
♦ ComPlete B3se. O&M .ind Monitoring
. .
. --:♦ T/ciiri-Sltse·querii Operator -
I .
Appendix F
•
•
• •
Westinghouse Remediation Services, Inc·.
Quality Assurance Program Plan
Authorized By:
Copy#:
Controlled Distribution*
Confidential and Proprietary
Copying Prohibited
Issued To:
Full signature approvals are kept on file with the WRS
Department of Environmental Compliance, Safety,
and Quality Assurance (ECSOA)
"This copy 1s "uncontrolled" unless the above 1nformat1on has been completed, with
signatures below, and the document issued by the WAS Department ol ECSOA.
Revision Number: 01
Revision Date: 10 January 1996
Replaces Revision Number: 00 dated 1994
Prepared by
Westinghouse Remediation Services, Inc.
Department of Environmental Compliance, Safety,
and Quality Assurance
675 Park North Boulevard
Atlanta, Georgia 30021
Date
H. Daugherty, President
Approved By: Date
A. Hobbs, Senior QA Administrator
•
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. INTRODUCTION
1.1 Policy
1 .2 Quality Assurance Plan Distribution
2. ORGANIZATION
2.1 General Requirements
2.2 Westinghouse Organization
2.2.1 Organizational Responsibilities
3. QA/QC PROGRAM
3.1 Requirements
3.2 Description
3.3 Phases of Control
3.4 Implementing Procedures
3.4.1 Project-Specific QA/QC Plans
3.4.2 Site-Specific Health and Safety Plan (HASP)
3.5 Personnel Training and Qualifications
3.5.1 Education
3.5.2 Formal and 'On-the-Job' Training
3.5.3 Training Related to Safety and Westinghouse Policy
3.5.4 Auditor Qualifications
4. DESIGN CONTROL
4.1 Requirements
4.2 Description
4.3 Drawing Control
5. PROCUREMENT DOCUMENT CONTROL
5.1 Requirements
5.2 Description
6. INSTRUCTIONS, PROCEDURES, AND DRAWINGS
6.1 Requirements
6.2 Procedure Elements
7. DOCUMENT CONTROL
7.1 Requirements
7 .2 Description
7.3 Westinghouse Management Information System
Con~olled DocumenVCopying Prohibited
Revision No.: 01 ii
•
Page
1
1
1
2
2
2
3
4
4
4
5
6
6
7
7
7
7
7
8
10
10.
10
11
12
12
12
13
13
13
14
14
14
14
Westinghouse QAP
Revision Date: 1 o January 1996
•
8. PREPARATION OF SUBMITTAL$
8.1 Requirements
8.2 Description
8.3 Required Plans
8.4 Additional Submittals
•
15
15
15
15
16
9. CONTROL OF PURCHASED MATERIAL, EQUIPMENT, AND SERVICES 20
9.1 Requirements 20
9.2 Description 20
9.3 Receiving Inspection 21
9.4 Forms and Reports 21
10. IDENTIFICATION AND CONTROL OF MATERIALS 22
10.1 Requirements 22
10.2 Description 22
11. INSPECTION 23
11.1 Requirements 23
11 .2 Description 23
12. TESTING 25
12. 1 Requirements 25
12.2 Description 25
13. MEASURING AND TEST EQUIPMENT 26
13.1 Requirements 26
13.2 Description 26
14. HANDLING, STORAGE, AND SHIPPING 27
14.1 Requirements 27
14.2 Description 27
14.3 Shipping 28
14.4 Storage 28
15. NON-CONFORMING MATERIALS AND SERVICES 29
15.1 Requirements 29
15.2 Description 29
15.3 Non-conformance Reporting 30
16. CORRECTIVE ACTION 31
16.1 Requirements 31
16.2 Description 31
ControUed Document/Copying Prohibited
Revision No.: 01 iii
Westinghouse OAP
Revision Dale: 10 January 1996
17. RECORDS
17.1 Requirements
17 .2 Description
•
17.3 Record Administration
17.4 Validation and Distribution
17 .5 Index and Identification
17.6 Storage and Preservation
17. 7 Disposition
18. AUDITING
18.1 Requirements
18.2 Description
18.3 Personnel
18.4 Audits
18.5 Audit System
18.6 Audit Reports
Controlled DocumenVCopylng Prohibited
Revision No.: 01
•
iv
Westinghouse OAP
Revision Date: 10January 1996
32
32
32
32
32
33
33
34
35
35
35
36
36
36
36
•
Figure
2-1 Westinghouse QA/QC Organization
3-1 Three-Phase Quality Control System
Controlled OocumenVCopying Prohibited
Revision No.: 01
LIST OF FIGURES
V
•
Page
Westinghouse OAP
Revision Date: 10January 1996
3
9
•
Table
8-1 QA/QC Submittals
Controlled DocumenVCopying Prohibited
Revision No.: 01
•
LIST OF TABLES
vi
Westinghouse OAP
Revision Date: 1 O January 1996
18
• •
1. INTRODUCTION
This Quality Assurance Program (OAP) Plan describes the written procedures to ensure quality control
(QC) over materials, suppliers, products, services, and workmanship in order to meet customer,
regulatory, and internal requirements for quality, safety and reliability, as well as, requirements specified
in customer contract documents and technical specifications. For each contract, project, or delivery
order, Westinghouse shall implement a project-specific quality assurance (QA)/QC plan based on the
corporate OAP, and customer contract and technical specifications. This plan will be followed by all
employees including subcontractors involved in quality related activities.
The OAP is maintained by the Westinghouse Department of Environmental Compliance, Safety, and
Quality Assurance and has the authority and responsibility to perform the following functions:
• Identify quality-related problems;
• Verify that activities affecting quality are performed correctly;
• Initiate, recommend, or provide corrective actions;
• Control the further use of non-conforming items until their evaluation and disposition has been
accomplished;
• Verify satisfactory implementation of corrective actions; and
• Initiate "Stop Work" orders.
The OAP documents Westinghouse' policies and commitments for ensuring that every aspect of a
project will comply with the quality standards, regulations and specifications set forth within each contract
or delivery order. The OAP outlines a variety of established Westinghouse QA/QC procedures that
apply to all phases of remediation, such as inspection, subcontractor oversight, submittal tracking and
control testing. Subcontractors and Westinghouse personnel at all levels are required to comply with the
applicable requirements of this OAP in performing their assigned duties. In addition, project-specific
procedures for implementing the OAP are established in project-specific QA/QC plans, which are
prepared with reference to particular client specifications and project-specific conditions upon contract
award.
1.1 Policy
It is the policy of Westinghouse to provide exemplary services io clients in accordance with the OAP.
The primary objective of the OAP is to ensure that the products and services provided by Westinghouse
to each customer comply with applicable regulations, codes, standards, contracts, and technical
specifications.
1.2 Quality Assurance Plan Distribution
Control and distribution of the Westinghouse OAP is the responsibility of the Department of
Er:wironmental Compliance, Safety, and Quality Assurance under a system for the controlled issue of the
latest revision. With each update and revision of the OAP, the department distributes copies of this
document to the appropriate personnel, along with memoranda documenting significant changes to
policies and procedures affe~ting implementation of the OAP.
Controlled DocumenVCapying Prohibited
Revision No.: 01
Westinghouse QAP
Revision Date: 10 January 1996
• •
2. ORGANIZATION
This section describes the Westinghouse organization for the management, direction and execution of
the OAP. QNQC is not the responsibility of one individual or group, but encompasses every
Westinghouse employee. subcontractor and supplier throughout all project-related functions. For each
project, Westinghouse will implement a project team to ensure that work is effectively managed and
produces consistently high-quality results. It is the responsibility of the project team management to
ensure that QNQC activities take place at all levels in the project organization, and that all personnel
associated with the project have a high level of quality control awareness and commitment.
2.1 General Requirements
• The authority and duties of persons and organizations performing activities affecting quality shall be
clearly established and delineated in writing.
• The persons and organizations performing QNQC functions shall have direct access to the highest
management level which ensures required access to work necessary and shall maintain sufficient
independence from cost and schedule to accomplish their duties and tasks.
• The persons and organizations performing QNQC functions shall have sufficient authority and
organizational freedom to identify quality problems, to initiate, recommend or provide solutions, and
to verify implementation of solutions.
• Control of activities affecting quality shall include verification of the QC functions associated with
attaining quality objectives. These QA functions to control activities include:
-Ensuring that a project-specific QNQC plan is written and effectively executed for each contract
or delivery order.
-Verifying, through auditing and inspection, that activities affecting quality have been
correctly performed.
-Initiating 'Stop Work' or other controls for conditions adverse to quality when immediate
corrective action is required.
The structure of the Westinghouse QNQC Organization is displayed in Figure 2-1. Assignments are
such that:
• Quality is achieved by those assigned responsibility;
• Quality is verified by_QC personnel not directly responsible for performing the work;
• All internal and external interfaces are identified, responsibilities defined and documented; and
• Responsibility for identification and control of non-conforming items/services has been identified.
2.2 Westinghouse Organization
All personnel functions are in accordance with the Westinghouse OAP as it applies to design,
fabrication, procurement, use, maintenance, repair or modification of items and services, and other
quality-affecting activities.
It is the policy of Westinghouse to perform work in accordance with the requirements of the applicable
regulatory requirements, codes and standards specified in client contractual and technical documents -
and as prescribed and implemented through the OAP and project-specific QNQC plans.
Westinghouse personnel assigned to perform QNQC, inspection or testing functions shall have
experience and training in the performance, organization, evaluation and review of results of inspection
and tests. They shall be capable of supervising or maintaining surveillance over inspections and tests
Controlled Document/Copying Prohibited
Revision No.: 01 2
Westinghouse OAP
Revision Date: 10January 1996
• • ..
performed by others, and of calibrating or establishing the validity of calibration of inspection,
measurement and test equipment. They shall have demonstrated proficiency in planning and setting up
tests and shall be capable of determining the validity of test results.
2.2.1 Organizational Responsibilities
The organizational structure and assignment of functional responsibilities within Westinghouse
are based on recognition of the qualifications of personnel to perform quality-affecting activities,
from top-level management down to individual operators and field technicians. The functional
responsibilities are such that:
• Attainment of quality objectives is accomplished by individuals assigned responsibility for
performing work to specifications.
• Verification of conformance to established quality requirements is accomplished by those
who do not have direct responsibility for the work.
• Personnel in QA/QC functions have direct access to top-level management.
WAS Pr&Sldeol
Hugh Daugherty -----
I
I I I
National Operations Senior Qua.Oty Assurance Stat8/EPA and Federal
Government Business -Manager Administrator Line Manager Carey Daniel Ahon Hobbs Brlnk Mll._r
I
Contracts/Purchasing OJallty Control Field General Commercial,
Manager Personnel Utllites & Pfpellne
Hank Guerke -Aulgned per )ob f-Business Line Manager
Mart< Smith
Regional Managers Florida Business 8111 Norton f-Line Manager -Doug Snyder Luke Frantz Mart< Smith (Acting)
Gould Hunter
I
Project Manago,. -Aulgned per )ob
I Subcontn,cton I I
Figure 2-1 Westinghouse QA/QC Organization
Controlled DocumenUCopying Prohibited
Revision No.: 01 3
Westinghouse OAP
Revision Date: 10 January 1996
• •
3. QA/QC PROGRAM
This OAP manual describes the policies and practices for a planned and disciplined approach to achieve
the standards for quality, safety and reliability of products and services supplied by Westinghouse. It is
structured to ensure that contractual, quality and regulatory requirements are met, and describes the
OAP as it applies to all remediation and construction activities.
3.1 Requirements
• The OAP shall be planned and documented by written policies, procedures or instructions and shall
be implemented throughout the life of the activities to which it applies.
• Methods shall be established for identifying the components, structures and systems to be covered
by the OAP. The Westinghouse OAP provides controls consistent with technical aspects and their
importance to safety.
• The OAP provides control over the activities affecting the quality and safety of the identified
structures, systems, components and services to the extent necessary to ensure that all items will
perform satisfactorily in service. Quality controls will be established at the earliest practical schedule
point for the implementation of quality-related activities.
• Activities affecting quality shall have suitably controlled conditions established to ensure that
appropriate equipment, environmental conditions and prerequisites for the given activity have been
satisfied.
• The OAP takes into account the need for special controls, processes, test equipment, tools and skills
to attain the required quality standards, and the need for verification of quality by inspection and
testing.
• The OAP provides for indoctrination and training of personnel performing activities affecting quality,
as necessary, to ensure that suitable proficiency is achieved and maintained.
• The status and adequacy of the OAP shall be regularly reviewed and evaluated by the
Westinghouse Department of Environmental Compliance, Safety, and Quality Assurance.
3.2 Description
Westinghouse has established a OAP to provide controls over the activities of Westinghouse employees
and subcontractors, each of whom has specific responsibilities for meeting the required quality
objectives. The OAP consists of several component parts which collectively provide for conducting
activities affecting quality under suitably controlled conditions, the use and maintenance of appropriate
equipment. the implementation of environmental and special process controls, the conduct of
inspections and tests, and the training and qualifications of personnel who perform activities that affect
quality. The Westinghouse OAP manual has been structured to address the common regulatory
requirements, industry codes and standards as they apply to specific Westinghouse activities.
Controlled DocumenVCopying Prohibited
Revision No.: 01 4
Westinghouse OAP
Revtslon Date: 10 January 1996
• •
3.3 Phases of Control
Westinghouse recognizes three phases of control for achieving quality standards. Each of the three
phases of control will delineated within project-specific comprehensive plans and will be implemented to
ensure that quality standards are met.
• The Preparatory Phase includes all the steps necessary to ensure that preparations are in place for
the commencement of a definable feature of work. During this phase. the following actions are
performed:
-Review of applicable specifications and contract drawings to ensure that all personnel
understand the work to be performed;
-Approval of materials and equipment by the client for that portion of the project;
-Submittal and approval of required shop drawings. plans and permits by the client for that
portion of the project;
-Implementation of all quality-related programs. including testing services;
-Physical examination of the work area or facility and the material and equipment to ensure
compliance;
-Initial safety hazard analysis and review of the site-specific Health and Safety Plan to ensure that
all applicable safety requirements are met and that site conditions are addressed;
-Client approval prior to the commencement of the Initial Phase;
-Meeting of the project team members to review quality standards of workmanship; and
-Repetition of the preparatory phase if standards of quality are not being met. a new work crew
arrives on site. a substantial period of inactivity has passed or significant problems occur.
• The Initial Phase includes a check of all preliminary work to ensure compliance with contract
requirements. During this phase, the following objectives are met:
-Inspection of preliminary work to ensure full compliance with contract requirements;
-Confirmation that required control inspection and testing is arranged to meet applicable
standards of quality and safety;
-Establishment of the level of workmanship in accordance with contract terms, client
specifications and Westinghouse QNQC procedures;
-Resolution of inconsistencies;
-Confirmation that safety standards comply with the initial hazard analysis and the site-specific
Health and Safety Plan; ·
-Submittal of reports and documents required by the client during this phase; and
-Repetition of the initial phase whenever standards of quality are not being met, a new work crew
arrives on site, a substantial period of inactivity has passed, or significant problems occur.
Controlled DocumenVCopying Prohibited
Revision No.: 01 5
Westinghouse OAP
Revision Date: 10Janue,y 1996
• •
• The Follow-up Phase comprises the performance and documentation of activities to ensure
continued, full compliance with contract terms. During this phase, the following actions are
conducted:
-Control testing and other daily checks to ensure continued compliance with contract
specifications;
-Recording of the results of checks and tests on forms or in other approved format and
submittal of documentation required by the client;
-Inspection and authorization by the client that constitutes acceptance of that portion of the work;
-Correction of any deficiencies or irregularities affecting quality or compliance; and
-Final follow-up check to ensure compliance prior to initiating the preparatory phase for the next
feature of work.
The Westinghouse system of QA/QC, including the three phases described above, is based on a
defined system by which personnel, materials and services are continually inspected for compliance with
specifications. This system is established through a series of periodic checkpoints or control tests.
Once a deficiency is identified, work proceeds along clearly defined paths to remedy the problem. This
basic premise is depicted in the Figure 3-1 flow chart. During each phase of quality control, each
member of the Westinghouse management team has responsibilities that contribute to ensuring that the
quality standards of a project are being met. In accordance with established standard procedures,
Westinghouse managers will oversee personnel to ensure that standards of quality are continuously met
or exceeded throughout the course of the project.
The assignment of specific duties and administrative functions for a project task will vary according to
the work to be performed, contract requirements and other factors, and will be determined as early as
possible. The lines of authority governing administrative and project personnel will be established prior
to the initiation of work on the project.
3.4 Implementing Procedures
Westinghouse QA/QC objectives are achieved through documented methods for planning, reviewing,
implementing and controlling activities affecting quality. Procedures are established and controls
identified early in the schedule for accomplishing quality-related tasks.
3.4.1 Project-Specific QA/QC Plans
A major component of the Westinghouse OAP is the project-specific QA/QC Plan, which is
prepared as required by the client. The project plan serves as the primary guidance document
for special project activities; it provides the plan participants with a clear and concise definition of
the scope of work and the applicable administrative, technical and quality control requirements
unique to the project. This plan also addresses methods for implementing the policies of the
OAP. Project-specific QA/QC Plans are written in accordance with:
• "Interim Guidelines and Specifications for Preparing Quality Assurance Project Plans",
(QAMS-005/80), USEPA, December 1980.
• "EPA Requirements for Quality Assurance Project Plans for Environmental Data
Operations", (EPA QA/R-5), USEPA.
Controlled DocumenVCopying Prohibited
Revision No.: 01 6
Westinghouse OAP
Revision Date: t O January 1996
• •
• "Quality Assurance/Quality Control Guidance for Removal Activities Sampling QNQC Plan
and Data Validation Procedures• Interim Final', (EPN540/G·90·004), USEPA, April 1990.
• "Data Quality Objectives for Remedial Response Activities", (EPA-540/G-87-003), USEPA,
March 1987.
• "Environmental Compliance Branch Standard Operating Procedures and Quality Assurance
Manual", (ECBSOPQAM), USEPA Region IV, February 1991.
• "Environmental Investigations Standard Operating Procedures and Quality Assurance",
(EISOPQAM), USEPA Region IV, May 1996.
Guidance is also obtained from the Quality Assurance Sampling for Environmental Response
(QASPER), Version 4.0, which is a PC-based software package used to draft site-specific quality
assurance plans and is based on the OSWER Directive 9360.4-01.
3.4.2 Site-Specific Health and Safety Plan (HASP)
Safety procedures further describe and implement the requirements of the OAP. The
Westinghouse Health and Safety Plan for hazardous waste site activities defines Westinghouse
policies and the methods of implementing health and safety protocol under federal regulations.
Site-specific safety procedures will be detailed within the HASP to describe the use of specific
monitoring equipment, calibration techniques, safety practices for work to be performed, and
other project tasks performed by trained personnel to ensure an effective injury/incident/illness
control program and safe performance of remediation activities.
3.5 Personnel Training and Qualifications
Westinghouse procedures provide measures for ensuring that personnel performing quality-affecting
activities receive indoctrination and training commensurate with the skill levels needed and that only
qualified personnel within Westinghouse are assigned to quality-related tasks. Westinghouse
management shall be responsible for assessing areas of responsibility to develop and plan appropriate
training and indoctrination for the individuals they supervise or manage. All training is formally
documented.
3.5.1 Education
All Westinghouse employees are educated in the technical objectives of their assigned tasks.
Education includes familiarization with the appropriate codes and standards and the QNQC
elements commensurate with their scope of work. Education will be accomplished through
formal instruction, meetings and briefings, and other appropriate means.
3.5.2 Formal and "On-the-Job" Training
Westinghouse will establish and maintain training activities for the continued proficiency of its
personnel in performing assigned tasks. Specific task training is either "on-the-job" or formal.
Formal training is provided through classroom sessions, seminars or certification courses or
programs. On-the-job training is provided by actual performance of specific tasks under the
direct supervision of a qualified person.
3.5.3 Training Related to Safety and Westinghouse Policy
The Westinghouse Health and Safety Administrator will maintain a master log of the formal
training and certifications related to health and safety and internal policy as they are received by
Westinghouse personnel. This record is maintained in the Field Certification Tracking System
Controlled Document/Copying Prohibited
Revision No.: 01 7
Westinghouse OAP
Revision Date: 10 January 1996
• •
software package distributed by the U.S. EPA, and will be reviewed and updated monthly by the
corporate Health and Safety Administrator. The system tracks the training, examinations and
certifications required under health and safety regulations and Westinghouse policies, including:
• 40-hour OSHA Hazardous Waste Operations and Emergency Response training and 8-hour
updates as required under 29 CFR 1910.120
• 8-hour OSHA Supervisory Training
• Medical Monitoring Program, including examinations for specialized personnel as required
for the Department of Transportation, asbestos handling and hazardous waste operations
• CPR and first aid
• Blood pathogens
• Respiratory protection
• Confined space entry
• Lock-out/tag-out
• Underground storage tank protocol
3.5.4 Auditor Qualifications
Audits will be performed to ensure that the requirements of the OAP. Auditors will also inspect
project-related activities and work to ensure compliance with the OAP, the project ONQC Plan,
compliance with applicable regulations, client specifications. Subcontractor facilities will also be
audited and inspected for compliance with these conditions, as well as, the subcontractor's
ONQC program. Westinghouse QNQC personnel shall have training and experience
commensurate with the scope, complexity or special nature of activities to be audited. Auditors
have been trained on the requirements bf QNQC fundamentals and specialized guidance on the
specific audit items.
Controlled Oocument'Copying Prohibited
Revision No.: 01 .8
Westinghouse OAP
Revision Date: 10January 1996
Receive
Delivery
Order (D O)
. . . . .
. . .
.
.
Scoping of DO . Identity Remedial Action
Objectives __. . Identify Initial DQOs . Contaminants of Concern . Contaminant Sources . Assess Adequacy of
Available Historical Data
Develop Submittals for
Data Collection (QAPP)
Sampling Procedures
Documentalion/G_ustody
Procedures
Calibration Procedures and
Frequency
Analytical Procedures
Data Reduction/Validation
and Reporting
Internal QC Checks
Performance/System Audits
Data Measurement
Assessment Procedures
Corrective Action
Procedures
QA Reports to Management
Legend
Blue -Preparatory Phase
Red -Initial Phase
Green -Follow-up Phase
Examine Remedial Alternatives
Site Characterization Treatability
Perform Bench ~ . Nature and . ~ Extent of Seate or Pilot
Contamination Treatability
Tests as
Necessary
Obtain r+-Project -Approval of Inspection
ubmittal ac check: . Equipment
• Preliminary Work
QA audit of:
Coordination . All Activities
Meeting . Materials . Workmanship . Compliance with
QAPP and WP . Identify Deficiencies
Preliminary . Initiate Corrective
Inspection Action
Work ,--
Proceeds Rework
Figure 3-1 Three-Phase Quality Control System
Controlled Document/Copying Prohibited
Revision No.: 01 9
Define Data Quality
Objectives (DQOs)
Identify Identify Data Users
Treatment --+ Identify Data Types
Technologies Identify 000 Needs . Evaluate
Sampling/Analytical
Options
I
. Systems
Audit
'
Tasks
Complete
•
Final
Inspection
'
Project
Complete
Westinghouse OAP
Revision Date: 10 January 1996
•
•
• •
4. DESIGN CONTROL
Where design activities apply to quality-related components or services, measures are established to
translate applicable regulatory requirements into accurate design, procurement and procedural
documents. Design documents, as applicable, shall include appropriate standards.
4.1 Requirements
Measures shall be established and implemented to ensure that applicable design bases and regulatory
requirements are correctly translated into specifications, drawings, work-plan procedures or instructions.
4.2
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Description
Changes or deviations from identified quality standards, including the reason or justification for the
changes, shall be identified, approved, documented and controlled in accordance with approved
procedures.
Design documents will be adequate to support the design, fabrication and use of the components or
equipment.
Design methods, materials, parts, components, systems or processes are selected and reviewed for
the suitability of their intended application. Appropriate review results are made available to
cognizant design personnel.
Final design ·documents are traceable to design input data in sufficient detail to facilitate design
verification. Final design documents identify assemblies and components that are commercial-grade
items upgraded or modified, and provide traceability to product difference.
Interface between participating design organizations shall be identified, coordinated and controlled .
Design analysis will be planned, controlled and documented in a legible, reproducible manner .
Design documents will be sufficiently detailed to permit other technically competent personnel to
review and understand the analysis and verify its adequacy without interface with the originator.
Calculations are traceable to the subject, component, system, originator, date, reviewers and other
data deemed appropriate. Computer programs are inspected to ensure that they produce valid data
within defined parameters.
Documentation of design analysis includes:
-Definition of the objective of the analysis;
-Design input and its source;
-Research, studies and background data;
-Assumptions and indication of those that must be verified;
-Identification of computer calculations, computer program used and other supporting data; and
Reviews and approvals.
• Procedures or instructions are established among participating design organizations for the review,
approval, release, distribution and revision of design documents involving design interfaces.
Controlled Document/Copying Prohibited
Revision No.: 01 10
WestinghOtJS8 OAP
Revision Date: 10 January 1996
• •
• The design documents shall be verified to ensure the adequacy of design by design review, alternate
or simplified calculation methods or suitable test program developed in accordance with
Westinghouse procedures. Verification activities are performed in a timely manner, and prior to the
placement of the component or equipment in use.
• The design shall be verified or checked by competent individuals or groups other than those who
performed the original design.
• The immediate supervisor of the individual who originated the design document may perform the
verification of design, provided that:
-The supervisor is the only person technically capable of performing the verification.
-QA audits are performed to prevent abuse of this practice.
• When a test program is used to verify or check the adequacy of a specific design feature in lieu of
other verifying or checking processes, it shall include suitable qualification testing of a prototype or
sample under the most adverse conditions.
• Design parameters, such as stress, cooling, thermal, hydraulic, decontamination, maintenance,
repair, in-service inspection, handling, storage, shipping, cleaning, accident analysis and delineation
of acceptance criteria for inspections and tests, as applicable, shall be properly considered, reviewed
and approved by the responsible design organization.
• Design changes, including field changes, shall be subject to the same controls applied to the original
design in accordance with approved Westinghouse procedures.
4.3 Drawing Control
Procedures will be established for preparation and control of drawings and specifications using normal
business standards and practices such as:
• Standard symbols/format
• Identification
• Status identification
• Checking methods
• Controlled issue and distribution
• Secure storage and control of original or master copies
• Revision control
Controlled DocuroonUCopying Prohibited
Revision No.: 01 11
Westinghouse CAP
Revision Date: 10January 1996
• •
5. PROCUREMENT DOCUMENT CONTROL
This section identifies the requirements and assigns responsibility for the control of procurement
documents for.purchased items and services obtained by Westinghouse.
5.1 Requirements
Measures shall be established and implemented to ensure that applicable regulatory requirements,
design bases, and technical and quality requirements are included or referenced in procurement
documents for materials, equipment or services.
5.2 Description
Procurement documents, including those for spare and replacement parts, and any changes thereto,
shall be reviewed prior to release by QNQC personnel and other appropriate technical disciplines to
ensure that sufficient technical and quality control requirements are included.
Procurement documents issued at all tiers of procurement sh.all contain the following, as applicable.
• Scope of work/item description;
• Technical and regulatory requirements;
• OAP requirements for suppliers and subtier suppliers;
• Document requirements that may include the supplie~s own ONQC program;
• Records to be retained, controlled and maintained by the supplier and those to be turned over to
Westinghouse prior to installation or use; and
• Records required to be submitted to Westinghouse will be specified; those records to be retained by
the supplier will be identified. Retention/disposition requirements will be prescribed.
Controlled Oocument'Copying Prohibited
Revision No.: 01 12
Westinghouse OAP
Revision Date: 10 January 1996
• •
6. INSTRUCTIONS, PROCEDURES, AND DRAWINGS
This section identifies the provision for the establishment of documented procedures and instructions for
the performance of quality-related activities.
6.1 Requirements
Measures will be established and implemented to ensure that all quality-affecting activities are performed
in accordance with appropriate documented instructions, procedures or drawings.
• Quality-affecting activities shall be performed in accordance with documented instructions,
procedures or drawings which are prepared and approved prior to commencing activities.
• Instructions, procedures and drawings include appropriate quantitative and qualitative acceptance
criteria to verify that the activity has been satisfactorily accomplished.
• Instructions and procedures shall be prepared, reviewed, issued and controlled in accordance with
Westinghouse procedures.
• QNQC personnel shall review and concur with inspection plans, testing, calibration, and special
processes; operating procedures, instructions, specifications and project plans, and any changes
thereto. Plans for inspection, including maintenance and repair, shall be reviewed by QNQC
personnel to ensure that appropriate inspection and hold points are included as necessary to verify
that the activities have been satisfactorily completed.
• Changes to instructions, procedures or drawings shall undergo the same review as the original
document.
6.2 Procedure Elements
Applicable elements to be included in the procedures are:
• Purpose, objectives or scope
• Responsibilities
• Safety precautions
• Descriptive methods for performing activities
• Reporting results
• Record-keeping
Procedures shall be approved by the manager responsible for the activity with the concurrence of
QNQC personnel. The procedures shall be reviewed by two technically knowledgeable persons and the
appropriate QNQC personnel.
Controlled DocumenVCopying Prohibited
Revision No.: 01 13
Westinghouse OAP
Revision Date: 10 January 1996
• •
7. DOCUMENT CONTROL
This section provides the requirements for the control of documents used in activities that affect quality.
7.1 Requirements
Measures shall be established and implemented to control the issuance and revision of quality-related
documents.
7 .2 Description
Documents which prescribe or affect quality shall be controlled. The control system shall be
implemented to ensure that all documents are properly identified, distributed and retained as specified in
the program contract, purchase order, project plan or other governing document. Documents shall be
reviewed for adequacy and approved for release by authorized QNQC personnel prior to issuance.
Documents shall be issued to and used at the location where the activity is being performed. Document
changes other than typographical errors and editorial corrections or minor changes shall be reviewed
and approved in the same manner as the original document.
The control system is documented in Westinghouse procedures and provides for:
• Identification of the documents to be controlled;
• Distribution of the controlled document;
• Assignment of responsibility for preparing, reviewing, approving and issuing documents;
• Review for adequacy, completeness and correctness prior to issue; and
• Identification of authorized persons who are permitted to make correction and minor changes that do
not require a review cycle to the same extent as original document.
7.3 Westinghouse Management Information System
Westinghouse will maintain a Management Information System (MIS} to be used for the planning,
scheduling, tracking, reporting and/or budgeting of multi-phase projects or for projects performed for
clients who require the use of'such a system. This system will be modified in accordance with an
established system to identify areas that may be improved, review commercially available software or
develop programs within Westinghouse and implement these additions into the existing program.
Personnel required to use this system will be trained in the format and application of the MIS on an
ongoing basis as modifications are made.
Controlled DocumenVCopying Prohibited
Revision No.: 01 14
Westinghouse OAP
Revision Date: 10 January 1996
• •
8. PREPARATION OF SUBMITTAL$
This section provides for the identification of preparation procedures for project-specific QA/QC plans
and submittals.
8.1 Requirements
Measures will be established for the preparation and submittal of required project QA/QC plans and
other submittals.
8.2 Description
Project-specific documents will serve as both reference and record for project activities. Project plans
and submittals will be prepared according to specifications of the client and will be consistent with
established Westinghouse QA/QC policies. These documents will be reviewed, revised and controlled
by qualified personnel assigned to these tasks in the manner identified in Sections 7.1 and 7.2 of this
OAP manual. As for all definable elements iri project execution, the preparation of submittals will be
regulated through implementation of the Preparatory, Initial and Follow-up Phases of QC. Project-
specific documents will be submitted to the client and other parties as required for review and
modification within the time frame allotted for their submittal.
Project plans required under 29 CFR 1910.120(b) will be prepared and maintained, whether or not these
plans are required by the client for submittal. These documents will be reviewed internally by qualified
Health and Safety personnel, as appropriate, for accuracy of content and adequacy to address the
project work. The plans will also be reviewed for consistency with Westinghouse policies, client policies
and specifications, and local, state and federal requirements.
Submittals such as additional plans, permits, drawings or other documents will be prepared by qualified
personnel assigned to these tasks. Documents required under contract terms for submittal shall be
prepared in accordance with client specifications.
8.3 Required Plans
It is the policy of Westinghouse to prepare project-specific QA/QC plans and other documents that are of
exemplary quality and that address the unique features of the work as well as standard Westinghouse
procedures to be implemented to ensure quality, compliance and safety. Certain documents will be
prepared for each project, whether or not they are required by the client, and will be subject to internal
review. These documents include a comprehensive Work Plan and a Site-Specific Health and Safety
Plan, as described below. A comprehensive Work Plan will be developed as required under 29 CFR
1910.120(b)(3). The Work Plan will fulfill the following requirements:
• Address anticipated cleanup activities and standard operating procedures:
• Define work tasks and objectives and identify the methods for accomplishing the objectives;
• Indicate personnel requirements for implementing the plan;
• Provide for the implementation of the training of personnel assigned to perform project activities, as
required under 29 CFR 1910.120(e);
Controlled Document/Copying Prohibited
Revision Na.: 01 15
Westinghouse OAP
Revision Date: 10January 1996
• •
• Provide for the implementation of the informational programs required under 29 CFR 1910.120(i);
• Provide for the implementation of the medical surveillance program required under 29 CFR
1910.120(1); and
• Include other elements, plans and other client-specific submittals required under the contract terms.
A Site-Specific Health and Safety Plan will be prepared prior to the performance of project work. The
Corporate Health and Safety Administrator shall oversee the preparation of the site-specific Health and
Safety Plan or shall designate other Westinghouse Health and Safety personnel for this task.
Westinghouse will submit this plan for approval as required by the contract terms.
The site-specific Health and Safety Plan shall be prepared, implemented and maintained in accordance
with 29 CFR 1910.120(b)(4). The plan will be subject to inspection to determine its effectiveness, and
any deficiencies or inconsistencies will be corrected. The site-specific Health and Safety Plan will
include the following information:
• A safety and health risk or hazard analysis for each site task and operation found in the workplan;
• Employee training assignments as required under 29 CFR 1910.120(e);
• Personal protective equipment (PPE) to be used for each site task and operation as required by the
PPE program under 29 CFR 1910.120(g)(5);
• Requirements for medical surveillance under 29 CFR 1910.120(1);
• Frequency and types of air monitoring, personnel monitoring and environmental sampling techniques
to be used, as well as the type of equipment to be used. The methods to maintain and calibrate this
equipment will also be id,entified;
• Site control measures in accordance with the site control program under 29 CFR 1910.120(d);
• Decontamination procedures as required under 29 CFR 1910.120(k);
• Emergency response plan as required under 29 CFR 1910.120(1);
• Confined space entry procedures;
• Spill containment program meeting the requirements specified under 29 CFR 1910.120U);
• Provision for pre-entry briefings to be held prior to the commencement of any site activity and as
required to verify compliance with the site-specific Health and Safety Plan;
8.4 Additional Submittals
In addition to those documents required under local, state and federal regulations, Westinghouse will
prepare project-specific QA/QC documents required under the terms of the contract.
The comprehensive Work Plan will include elements and plans required by the client to ensure that
standards such as compliance, safety to human health and the environment, and QA/QC are
maintained. (Examples of such documents include shop drawings, Sampling and Analysis Plans, Spill
Controlled OocumenVCopying Prohibited
Revision No.: 01 16
Westinghouse OAP
Revision Date: 10 January 1996
• •
Control Plans. Project ONOC Plans.) These documents, when client required, shall form part of the
comprehensive Work Plan submitted by Westinghouse.
Qualified personnel will be assigned to prepare, procure and authorize submittals required by the
contract terms. These assignments will be based on established Westinghouse criteria and policies and
will be specified in the comprehensive Work Plan.
Forms and documents that will be prepared and submitted for clients that require these submittals are
listed in Figure 8-1. The types of submittals, responsible parties and deadlines will vary among projects.
In the event that information contained in Figure 8-1 or the OAP manual conflicts with project
requirements or contract terms, the project requirements or contract terms shall govern.
Required submittals will be reviewed, modified and submitted in accordance with the OAP and the
system established for meeting the project objectives. Documents not listed or specified in this OAP
manual that are required by the client will be prepared and submitted in accordance with contract terms
and OAP procedures.
Controlle<l OocumenVCopying Prohibite<l
Revision No.: 01 17
Westinghouse OAP
Revision Date: 10 January 1996
• •
FIGURE 8-1 QA/QC SUBMITTALS
·:i Name of Report ·_ ~--• ~. r ., \ ~ •• :;,-i ~.:.c.;.;:
Or Submittal* -, -· -. ,.-, 1· ·-. · .•. : '· tPurpo~e~:::~}\}iJ'.(
Applicable Federal, State or
Local Permits
Submittal Register
Schedules Including Critical
Path and Payment
Site-Specific Health and
Safety Plan
Comprehensive Workplan
Other Project-Specific Plans
Must be obtained prior to the
performance of the applicable
work task under Federal, state
and/or local laws. (Permits
required for specific site tasks
such as confined space entry are
obtained as needed !~om
authorized Westinghouse H&S
personnel. l
Tracks all written documents to
be submitted to the client and
serves as the schedule for
controlling submittals. The
document specifies the required
submittals and due dates in
accordance with agreed-upon
terms and schedules.
Scheduling of personnel and
construction over a specified
period; payment schedule; site
tasks and duration; critical path
schedule; start, completion and
milestone dates; as required by
client.
Addresses the safety and health•
hazards of each phase of site
operation and includes the
requirements and procedures for
employee protection; is
maintained on site; and contains
all elements of 29 CFR
1910.120(bl/4).
Addresses tasks and objectives
of site operations and the •
logistics and resources required;
contains all elements specified in
contract documents and
aoolicable requlations.
Address site-specific or client-
specific concerns, such as spill
, and material discharge,
environmental protection, plans
for sampling and analysis. These
additional plans are maintained
by Westinghouse as part of the
Comprehensive Workplan. ·
Controlled DocumenVCopying Prohibited
Revision No.: 01 18
•. General Time
Frame for
· ·completion
(Dates set by ·
each contract)
Preferably Prior
to Initiation of Any
Site Work, but in
any case Prior to
the Initiation of
the Site Task to
which the Permit
Applies
Within 30 Days
after Receipt of
Notice to
Proceed;
Monthly
Thereafter
Within 30 Days
after Receipt of
Notice to
Proceed;
Monthly
Thereafter
Within 21 Days
after Receipt of
Notice of Award
of Contract or
Delivery Order
Within 21 Days
after Receipt of
Notice of Award
of Contract or
Delivery Order
Within 21 Days
after Receipt of
Notice of Award
of Contract or
Delivery Order
-Person(s) · --~-
Responsible For,:
· ___ ·c Completion/;,{
-· Verification _,,,
·-· .. ';, ·, .... ~ ·:·-
Project Manager
Project Manager
Project Manager
Project Manager
and Assigned H&S
Personnel
Project Manager
Project Manager
and QA/QC
Personnaj
Westinghouse QAP
Revision Date: 10 January 1996
• •
FIGURE 8-1 QA/QC SUBMITTAL$ (CONTINUED)
. . ' Name of Report ., !: ... '.' -~ ,: :, ::\-'' ;~-: ·/:,:/ /~~};-.:;~.!~ »:·. ;, ·• Or Submittal* ' '· ·_, Purpose;, ' .. ., '· ' ·,.
Shop Drawings Submitted to client for
informational purposes, the shop
drawings are obtained from the
manufacturer and specify the
design of procured materials or
equipment.
Preparatory Phase Documents that all elements of
Checklist the Preparatory Phase have been
completed
Initial Phase Checklist Documents that all elements of
the Initial Phase have been
completed
Follow-up Phase Checklist Documents that all elements of
the Follow-up Phase have been
completed
Materials Test Summary Documents the results of all tests
and retests of materials used for
a variety of site construction
activities
Daily Construction Quality Recaps the day's events and
Control Report records vital information including
work performed by Westinghouse
and subcontractors, the day's
preparatory, follow-up and safety
insoections, and uocoming work
Atmospheric Monitoring Documents air monitoring
Report conducted during construction
activities
Daily Inspection Form Documents the inspection of the
construction area and equipment
to ensure compliance
Controlled Document/Copying Prohibited
Revision No.: 01 19
General Time · Person(s) ).::f
,.,.·, Frame for .·-::. . Respo'!,~ibl~. For,,,
·: Completion · · · .; Completion/';:-:\' -";.:~.
(Dates set by Verification :"-"'·
each contract) ' ~~-•-~j .. ,,: .. ~:-:'~' ~:/;
Within 21 Days Project Manager
after Receipt of
Notice of Award of
Contract or
Delivery Order
For each Project Manager
Preparatory and QC Personnel
Phase of Each
Project Task
For each Initial Project Manager
Phase of Each and QC Personnel
Project Task
For each Follow-Project Manager
up Phase of Each and QC Personnel
Project Task
Upon receipt of Project Manager
Control Test and QC Personnel
Results I
Daily Project Manager
and QC Personnel
Daily Site H&S Officer
Daily Project Manager
and QC Personnel
Westinghouse OAP
Revision Date: 1 O January 1996
• •
9. CONTROL OF PURCHASED MATERIAL, EQUIPMENT, AND SERVICES
This section describes methods for conducting source evaluation and selection for items affecting quality
and workmanship; the measures established to evaluate the quality of material, equipment or services;
inspection of supplier products prior to acceptance; and other Q/1/QC standards applicable to warrant
the purchase, delivery and installation of quality products for each project.
9.1 Requirements
Measures shall be established and implemented to ensure that material, equipment and services
purchased either directly or through actual or potential contractors and subcontractors conform or will
conform to the procurement documents.
9.2 Description
Procurement planning methods will be described in Westinghouse submittals as appropriate. During
planning, the Project Manager and assigned procurement and 0/1/0C personnel; shall determine what is
to be accomplished; who is responsible for each activity; the methods by which activities are to be
performed; and the schedule for key events and milestones. Procurement processes will be
implemented as early as possible during the Preparatory Phase of each project task to ensure
Westinghouse/subcontractor interface and product compatibility when compared to client specifications.
Procurement of quality-related items will involve the following:
• Selection of the vendors;
• Evaluation of bids and contract award;
• Supplier performance;
• Verification of supplier activities through audit, survey and/or inspection;
• Non-conformance control; and
• Acceptance of product/services.
Selection of procurement sources shall be based on an evaluation of their capabilities in accordance with
procurement requirements. The following attributes may be considered:
• The supplier's capability to comply with quality-specifying codes or standards. The OAP or program
presented by the potential subcontractor or supplier shall serve as a qualitative and quantitative
measure of the subcontractor's ability to meet project requirements.
• Results of the survey of the supplier's facility, technical capabilities and/or OAP implementation.
• Review of the supplier's previous records and performance for similar products or services.
• Bid evaluation is performed to determine the extent of conformance to procurement documents.
Additional considerations such as supplier's personnel, production capability and other alternatives
may be reviewed.
• Audits of subcontractor facilities, practices, materials and workmanship are performed in accordance
with Westinghouse auditing procedures for QA purposes, including compliance. In general,
authorized Q/1/QC personnel will conduct formal audits of the services and facilities of
subcontractors retained by Westinghouse.
Controlled DocumenVCopying Prohibited
Revision No.: 01 20
Westinghouse OAP
Revision Date: 10 January 1996
• •
• Supplier performance evaluations are established in accordance with Westinghouse procedures.
The results of the procurement of each service shall be reviewed for acceptability by the appropriate
manager. Evaluation criteria will be based on the specifications, standards and codes cited in
individual procurement documents.
• Documentary evidence that material and equipment conform to the procurement requirements shall
be available at the supplier's facility prior to use of materials and equipment by Westinghouse.
• Purchased materials, parts and components required for a project shall be inspected in accordance
with approved Westinghouse procedures during the initial Preparatory Phase for each definable
feature of work.
• Methods of correcting non-conformances of procured material, equipment and services shall be
implemented in accordance with Westinghouse procedures and/or identified in the procurement
documents.
• Records which identify the items and codes, standards, specifications, drawings, regulations or other
acceptance criteria met by the items, including non-conformances and corrective actions, shall be
maintained in accordance with Westinghouse OAP (Section 7.0). These records shall be prepared
as required on standard forms.
• Delivered products shall be accompanied by appropriate documentation as identified in the purchase
order prior to use.
9.3 Receiving Inspection
Purchased items are inspected as required to verify key attributes such as proper configuration
identification, dimensions and cleanliness; and to verify that no damage was sustained during shipment.
9.4 Forms and Reports
As required, Westinghouse will accurately complete forms or reports pertaining to the quality of materials
received. These forms will be submitted to the appropriate parties within the time frame designated for
their submittal. Westinghouse QNQC personnel will be assigned to inspect and verify, or obtain
verification, that supplied materials meet specifications and established standards of quality.
Controlled DocumenVCopying Prohibited
Revision No.: 01 21
Westinghouse OAP
Revfsion Date: 1 O January 1996
• •
10. IDENTIFICATION AND CONTROL OF MATERIALS
This section applies to Westinghouse controls related to materials.
10.1 Requirements
Measures shall be established to ensure that only acceptable items are used or installed. These
measures shall provide for the identification and control of materials.
10.2 Description
Physical identification shall be used to the maximum extent possible in accordance with approved
Westinghouse procedures. Where physical identification is impossible or impractical, physical
separation, procedural control or other appropriate measures shall be established. Markings, when
used, shall be applied using materials and methods which provide a clear and legible identification and
do not detrimentally affect the function or use of the item. When appropriate, markings shall be
transferred to each part of an identified item when subdivided, and shall not be obliterated or hidden by
surface treatment, processing or coatings unless other means are substituted.
Identification and traceability of items such as traceability of an item to a particular contract, or
specification and grade of material, batch, lot, part or serial number, specified tests, inspections or other
activities shall be performed in accordance with appropriate Westinghouse procedures.
Maintenance of identification of stored items shall be in accordance with the specific handling, storage or
shipping procedures, or project plans. These measures shall include provisions for replacement of
markings due to damage or mishandling, protection from deterioration due to environmental exposure,
or updating existing records as necessary. Items having limited calendar shelf life or operating life shall
be controlled to prevent their inadvertent use in accordance with the specific handling, storage or
shipping procedures, or project plans as appropriate.
Controlled DacumenVCapying Prohibited
Revision No.: 01 22
Westinghouse OAP
Revision Date: 10January 1996
• •
11. INSPECTION
This section describes the requirements for planning and controlling inspection activities for quality-
related activities associated with remediation services.
11.1 Requirements
Inspections required to verify conformance of an item or activity to specified requirements will be
planned and executed. All inspection methods and results will be documented.
11.2 Description
Inspection planning shall be accomplished to ensure that inspection procedures, instructions or
checklists identify the characteristics and activities to be inspected; acceptance and rejection criteria;
responsible organization for performing inspection; and recording of objective evidence of inspection
results. Planning also includes identification of hold or witness points; approval of data by supervisor to
ensure that all inspection prerequisites and requirements have been satisfied, including operator and
equipment qualifications; and establishment of sampling methods, if applicable, in accordance with
approved Westinghouse procedures or project QNQC plans.
• QNQC personnel shall not report directly to project managers who are responsible for performing
the work being inspected.
• QNQC personnel who verify conformance of work for acceptance shall be qualified to perform the
inspection.
• In-process inspections shall be performed as necessary to verify quality. Indirect control by
monitoring may be utilized when direct inspection is disadvantageous. Both inspection and
monitoring are provided when control is inadequate without both. The combination inspection and
process monitoring are performed in a systematic manner to ensure quality is achieved throughout
the duration of the process.
• Final inspection shall include a records review of the results of inspection and resolution of non-
conformances identified in previous inspections. Checklists will be established for final inspection to
verify that the inspection requirements have been complied with.
• Quality records generated in support of an inspection shall be reviewed for adequacy and
completeness prior to acceptance.
• Inspection records shall contain, at a minimum, the item inspected, date of inspection, inspector,
type of observation, results or acceptability, and reference to information on action taken in
connection with non-conformances.
• The acceptance of the item will be documented and approved by authorized personnel.
Modification, repair or replacement requires reinspection or retest as appropriate to verify
acceptability.
• Project plans or procedures shall be used to establish an inspection program. The program shall
identify the items to be monitored, the criteria for replacement or acceptability, and the frequencies
of inspection assigned to each item.
Controlled DocumenVCopying Prohibited
Revision No.: 01 23
Westinghouse OAP
Revision Date: 1 0 January 1996
• •
• In-service inspection methods will be established to verify that characteristics of an item continue to
stay within the specified limits. Inspection methods will include routine evaluation of emergency and
safety systems, verification of the calibration and integrity of instruments or systems, and their
maintenance, as appropriate.
• Records of in-service activities will conform to Westinghouse procedures and will be documented.
Controlled DocumenUCopying Prohibited
Revision No.: 01 24
Westinghouse OAP
Revision Date: 10 January 1996
• •
12. TESTING
This section describes the requirements for test control to demonstrate that new, modified or in-service
components, parts, and other items function satisfactorily.
12.1 Requirements
Methods shall be established and implemented to ensure that all testing required to demonstrate
structures, systems and components perform satisfactorily will be accomplished through use of and in
accordance with written testiprocedures. The test procedures shall incorporate the requirements and
acceptance limits contained in the applicable design documents, governing regulations, certificates of
compliance or other specifying documents. The testing shall include, as appropriate, proof test, pre-
operational tests, maintenance, repair, modification, replacement and operational and developmental
tests.
12.2 Description
Required testing of specific components, parts or items are described in either the project QA/QC plans
or Westinghouse procedures. ·
• Tests may include, as appropriate, prototype qualification tests, production tests, proof tests, pre-
operational tests and operational tests.
• Tests will be controlled through written test procedures prepared in accordance with design
requirements. Test requirements and acceptance criteria shall be based upon specified
requirements contained in applicable design documents, certificates of compliance, maintenance or
operating manuals, or other pertinent technical documents.
• Test procedures will include or reference test objectives, and will address prerequisites,
instrumentation, personnel training, environmental conditions and documentation requirements.
• Test records content shall, at a minimum, identify the item tested, date of test, tester or data
recorder, type of observation, results and acceptability, deviations noted and actions taken thereto,
and person evaluating test results.
• Test results shall be documented and evaluated by qualified individuals or groups in accordance with
approved procedures.
• Special training or qualification of personnel who perform the testing shall be accomplished, as
necessary, prior to performing the test.
• Data-recording by qualified individuals or groups shall be as specified in the particular test
procedure. Quality monitoring shall be performed by Westinghouse QA/QC personnel.
Controlled Document/Copying Prohibited
Revision No.: 01 25
Westinghouse OAP
Revision Date: 1 O January 1996
• •
13. MEASURING AND TEST EQUIPMENT
This section describes the controls of measuring and test equipment (MTE) that affect quality.
13.1 Requirements
Westinghouse personnel who use MTE are responsible to verify that the instrument has not exceeded
the calibration due date and to remove the calibrated item from service if the calibration date has
expired, or the instrument is suspected to need repair or be out of calibration due to damage.
13.2 Description
Westinghouse personnel will select instruments that fit the required range, tolerance, type and accuracy
as specified in pertinent documents (such as operating procedures) to verify conformance to the
specified criteria.
• MTE shall be calibrated, adjusted and maintained at scheduled intervals against certified equipment
or standards having known valid relationships to nationally recognized standards. If no national
standard exists, the basis of calibration shall be documented.
• The method and interval of calibration for each item shall be based on the type of device, stability,
characteristics, required accuracy, purpose, frequency of usage and environment where used.
• Calibration procedures for control and issuance of tools, gauges and test equipment will be
implemented as a quality-related procedure. Calibration methods shall be documented, and
performed by competent personnel in an environment that will not adversely affect the calibration.
Special controls shall be documented and applied when they are required for environmental
conditions such as temperature, humidity, cleanliness or radiation to maintain the accuracy or
operating characteristic of the device or standard.
• When a controlled device is found to be out,of calibration, personnel shall determine how long the
condition existed or when the calibration of the device was last verified. Items inspected, tested or
processed with the MTE during the periods of uncertain calibration shall be controlled as non-
conforming until their acceptability is verified. Out-of-calibration MTE will be tagged and/or
segregated to prevent inadvertent use and shall not be used until recalibration. If MTE is found to
be consistently out of calibration, it shall be repaired or replaced.
• Prior to use, MTE shall be verified to have a calibration sticker affixed to the instrument exterior.
MTE must be traceable to their calibration and servicing history.
Controlled DocumenVCopying Prohibited
Revision No.: 01 ' 26
Westinghouse OAP
Revision Date: 1 O January 1996
• •
14. HANDLING, STORAGE, AND SHIPPING
This section describes the control to prevent damage or loss and to minimize deterioration in designated
items during handling, storage, preservation and shipping of the items.
14.1 Requirements
Special documents (such as instructions, procedures and drawings) shall be used to describe the
methods for handling, storage, packaging, shipping and preservation of items. These instructions shall
be in accordance with design requirements and applicable codes, standards and regulations. Qualified
personnel shall be assigned to minimize deterioration of the item. General marking and labeling for
packaging, shipping, handling and storage of items shall be adequate to identify, maintain and preserve
shipment. Special environments or special controls will be identified.
14.2 Description
A final pre-release review of system, components, or certified or licensed packages prior to delivery shall
be performed in accordance with Westinghouse procedures or the appropriate project QNQC plans.
This review shall ensure that equipment has been prepared for delivery to Westinghouse in accordance
with approved drawing, specifications, government regulations, certificates of compliance, or other
specifying documents; that all required inspections and tests have been completed; that the items are
properly identified; that the necessary shipping papers have been prepared; and, as applicable, that the
item contains operating manuals, maintenance manuals and generic procedures relating to the use of
the item.
• Packaging prepared by Westinghouse for delivery to a carrier shall be reviewed to ensure that all
conditions, including specified operations, inspections, tests, DOT requirements, necessary shipping
papers, and as applicable, draining and/or drying of package containments have been met.
• Receipt and initial storage of materials, parts and components shall be in accordance with approved
Westinghouse procedures. Withdrawal of materials, parts and components from initial storage shall
be in accordance with Westinghouse procedures. Materials with identified shelf lives shall be
handled in accordance with the manufacture~s instructions or specific procedures.
• Handling equipment selected and used shall be adequate for protection of the item, and shall be
operated by competent personnel. Special tools or equipment shall be used to prevent damage for
items that are:
-Heavy or bulky
-Critical or of high value
-Sensitive to physical forces
-Requiring of periodic inspection and testing.
• Prior to packaging, cleaning may be performed if necessary. Measures shall be employed to
minimize contamination (e.g., oil, sealing, coating, inert atmosphere). If special cleaning is not
required, standard industry cleaning practices may be utilized. Competent personnel shall perform-
special cleaning operations.
• Crates or special containers shall be provided as required to protect the item and to minimize
deterioraiion. Shipping instructions shall denote special packaging or handling instructions.
Controlled DocumenVCopying Prohibited
Revision No.: 01 27
Westinghouse CAP
Revision Date: 1 O January 1996
• •
• Identification shall be provided on packaged items or the container.
• Special equipment or protective environments necessary to protect items, such as inert gas
atmosphere, moisture control and temperature control, shall be specified. Required preparatory
processes, as required, ~hall be specified.
• Preservation methods may include heaters, desiccant, coatings or other means. Materials requiring
special preservation shall be inspected periodically to verify preservation effectiveness, and
corrective action shall be applied as necessary.
14.3 Shipping
Shipping instructions shall identify each item, any special packaging, preservation or handling
requirements, shipping mode and destination, special handling, and storage requirements upon receipt
as appropriate. Package labeling or markings shall meet applicable regulations, and DOT or State or
Interstate Commerce Commission requirements.
14.4 Storage
Requirements for special handling, special tools, or protection shall be made known to the party
responsible for storage of the item and to those who verify storage controls. Stored items shall be
periodically inspected to detect damage or deterioration and to verify item identification. Corrective
action will be applied, as necessary. Procedures, instructions and checklists shall be prepared in
accordance with applicable regulations, codes and standards. Storage procedures shall provide for a
segregated area to store non-conforming items.
Controlled DocumenVCopying Prohibited
Revision No.: 01 28
Westinghouse OAP
Revision Date: 10January 1996
• •
15. NON-CONFORMING MATERIALS AND SERVICES
This section establishes controls and requirements for non-conforming materials, services, components,
parts or activiiies that affect the quality of project-related items or services. Non-conforming items or
services shall be controlled to prevent inadvertent use or installation.
15.1 Requirements
Measures shall be established and implemented to control materials, parts, components, chemicals, and
services which do not conform to applicable codes, standards, specifications or other documented
requirements in order to prevent their inadvertent or continued use, further processing, delivery or
installation.
15.2 Description
Reporting, identification, and documentation requirements of non-conformances are provided in
approved Westinghouse procedures to ensure proper management attention, notification of non-
conforming condition, and proper documenting of the condition, which includes the corrective action and
cause.
• Identification of a non-conforming item shall be legible and conspicuously displayed by use of
marking, tagging or other means which does not adversely affect the end use of the item.
• Segregation of non-conforming materials, parts, and components shall be accomplished, as feasible,
to ensure that they will not be inadvertently used. The segregated storage area for non-conforming
items shall be clearly designated and marked, roped or otherwise distinctly contained.
• Disposition of non-conformances shall be prepared and approved by responsible individuals or
groups in accordance with documented Westinghouse procedures. The non-conforming item shall
be controlled pending evaluation and approved disposition by authorized personnel. The justification
of final disposition of reject, repair, rework or use-as-is shall be documented on the non-
conformance form.
• Notification of affected organizations shall be in accordance with documented Westinghouse
procedures. The responsibility and authority for evaluation and disposition of non-conformances are
defined in Westinghouse procedures.
• Reinspection or retesting of non-conforming items following rework shall be performed using the
original acceptance criteria, and are subject to design control measures commensurate to those
applied to the original design.
• Non-conformances shall be discontinued and/or removed and documented in accordance with
Westinghouse procedures.
• Trending of non-conformances to determine quality trends for management review and assessment
will be accomplished as required.
• Non-conformances shall be evaluated, followed up, and closed in accordance with approved
Westinghouse OAP procedures.
Controlled Document/Copying Prohibited
Revision No.: 01 29
Westinghouse OAP
Revision Date: 1 O January 1996
• •
15.3 Non-conformance Reporting
Non-conformance reports shall include the following information as a minimum:
• Identity of the item, service or activity.
• Description of the non-conformance with adequate detail to facilitate evaluation and disposition.
• Identification of tests or re-inspection required prior to acceptance.
• Identification and approval of responsible managers.
• Evidence that the disposition was performed as authorized.
• Record of results of retest, re-inspection, training or other corrective action.
Non-conformances are retained as a quality record. Non-conformances are logged, the status reviewed
periodically, corrective action implementation verified, and closed by authorized Westinghouse QNQC
personnel.
Controlled Document/Copying Prohibited
Revision No.: 01 30
Westinghouse OAP
Revision Date: 10 January 1996
•
16. CORRECTIVE ACTION
This section describes controls to ensure correction of quality-adverse conditions. Adverse conditions
will be identified and reported; stop work initiated as appropriate; and the conditions corrected in a timely
manner.
16.1 Requirements
Measures shall be established and implemented to ensure that conditions adverse to quality such as
deficiencies, deviations, defective material and equipment, or adverse conditions concerning the use,
maintenance or repair of equipment, are promptly identified and corrected. In each case, the cause of
the conditions shall be determined and corrective action taken to preclude recurrence. The identification
of the significant conditions, the cause of the condition, and the corrective action taken shall be
documented and reported to Westinghouse management.
16.2 Description
Significant or repetitive conditions adverse to quality shall be reported in accordance with approved
Westinghouse OAP procedures. The conditions shall be identified promptly and corrected as soon as
practicable. Appropriate management will be apprised of the condition.
• In cases in which corrective action cannot be accomplished immediately, the appropriate manager or
vendor will provide a written response. The response shall describe the cause of the deficiency and
the proposed corrective action to be completed within a specified time.
• Corrective action shall be sufficient to preclude reoccurrence.
• If corrective action is not,taken for significant or repetitive conditions adverse to quality, authorized
QA/QC personnel shall issue a stop work order, immediate verbal notification to the project
manager, and a formal report. Work may commence,after satisfactory resolution of the non-
conforming condition as verified by the Westinghouse QA/QC personnel.
• Follow-up to ensure that corrective actions were effectively implemented shall be performed by
Westinghouse QA/QC personnel.
• Westinghouse QA/QC personnel shall be responsible for verifying the effectiveness and closure of
corrective actions.
• Corrective actions shall be reported, dispositioned, followed up, and closed in accordance with
Westinghouse procedure requirements.
• Documentation of corrective actions may include logs, formal reports, and objective evidence of
satisfactory implementation.
Controlled Document/Copying Prohibited
Revision No.: 01 31
Westinghouse QAP
Revision Date: 1 O January 1996
• •
17. RECORDS
This section describes the controls for quality records that furnish documentary evidence of the quality of
safety-related parts, components, services or activities provided by Westinghouse.
17 .1 Requirements
Measures shall be established and implemented to ensure that records which sufficiently document
evidence of quality are specified, prepared and maintained. Quality records shall be complete, legible,
identifiable and retrievable.
17 .2 Description
Quality records shall be identified in design, procurement, project control documents and Westinghouse
procedures.
17.3 Record Administration
• Quality records include, but are not limited to, contract documents, specifications and procedures;
documents that implement customer, federal and state requirements; and records that document
compliance with codes, standards, licensing or other regulatory requirements. Each Westinghouse
project manager is responsible for the identification of quality records for his area of responsibility.
• Quality records shall be described in QA/QC procedures which provide system definition,
implementation and enforcement. Appropriate Westinghouse and project procedures,
specifications, procurement documents, or other documents will define the quality records to be
generated or supplied.
• Quality records requirements shall be determined for each project and will include:
-Records required by the contract or applicable codes, standards or regulations;
-Records to be transmitted to the client and the turnover schedule;
-Records to be maintained by Westinghouse during the project; and
-Records to be maintained by Westinghouse after completion of the project.
• Westinghouse will identify retention periods for maintaining working files, and turnover periods for
submitting quality records to the client.
• Westinghouse will identify in procurement documents the types of quality records to be provided to
Westinghouse, retention responsibility, and the method of final disposal.
17.4 Validation and Distribution
• QA/QC personnel shall ensure that active project files are established and maintained. These
records shall be identified, indexed, maintained and controlled to ensure readability and retrievability,
and to prevent loss or damage.
Controlled OocumenVCopying Prohibited
Revision No.: 01 32
Westinghouse OAP
Revision Date: 10January 1996
• •
• Records will be distributed and controlled in accordance with Westinghouse OAP guidelines.
• For site projects, a site file will be established and a backup home office copy maintained. Records
required to be transmitted to client shall be transmitted by means of a transmittal form, letter or other
suitable means.
• Quality records will be validated upon completion by stamp, initial or signature and date of an
authorized individual.
17 .5 Index and Identification
An indexing system will be established in accordance with QA/QC procedures. The index will be defined
in sufficient detail to permit identification between the item or activity and the record that applies to that
item or activity.
17.6 Storage and Preservation
• Assigned QA/QC personnel will be responsible for receiving quality records and controlling their
safety. A receipt control system is delineated in Westinghouse QA/QC procedures.
• QA/QC personnel shall ensure that quality records are maintained in duplicate files in separate
buildings or in one-hour rated fireproof cabinets. Quality records received from Westinghouse,
subcontractors, vendors or clients will be:
-Verified to be legible and complete and in agreement with the transmittal;
-Indexed and assigned a file number;
-Maintained, controlled and accounted for if removed from the file;
-Controlled for filing of supplemental information or correction of superseded records;
-Processed for final storage and maintained in appropriated facilities.
• The records will be stored in accordance with approved procedures. These procedures shall
designate:
-The storage location(s);
-Description of storage facility;
-Filing index;
-Receipt control;
-Authorization for access to and control of the files;
-Method for maintaining control of and accountability for records removed; and
Method to file supplementary records and disposition of outdated records.
• Preservation requirements on storage locations include:
-Provision to prevent damage from environmental conditions;
-Placement of records in binders or folders for storage on shelves or in file cabinets;
-Storage of special process records (e.g., films and negatives) to prevent damage from light,
temperature and other causes).
-Safekeeping requirements shall be established to preclude unauthorized access to files. Lost or
damaged files will be replaced, restored or substituted. Facilities for quality records will be
maintained in dual facilities separated by enough distance to preclude a simultaneous hazard.
Controlled DocumenVCopying Prohibited
Revision No.: 01 33'
Westinghouse OAP
Revision Date: 1 O January 1996
• •
In lieu of dual storage, selected records may be stored in a fireproof rated cabinet, that meets
applicable codes, standards, and requirements.
• Project QNQC personnel shall establish and maintain records applicable to the OAP, including
transmittals, distribution lists, corrective action reports, internal audits, auditor qualification,
documentation and disposition of quality records, non-conformance reports, divisional audits,
divisional QNQC indoctrination, and personnel certifications records. During the course of special
projects, QNQC personnel will be responsible for assuring maintenance of the home office copy of
project files.
• Storage systems (site, home office or corporate) shall have a documented list of personnel who have
access to the files that contain quality records and other quality documentation. Records retained by
subcontractors (or Westinghouse) shall be accessible to Westinghouse (or the client). An index or
other retrieval system will be maintained to ensure traceability and timely retrieval of quality records.
17.7 Disposition
Records accumulated by Westinghouse subcontractors prior to transfer to Westinghouse shall be
available for inspection by Westinghouse. Records submission to Westinghouse will be identified on
procurement documents. ·
The most stringent requirements shall be used to determine final disposition of records. Non-permanent
records will be preserved until, as appropriate:
• Items are released for shipment;
• Regulatory requirements are satisfied;
• Operational siatus warrants disposal;
• Warranty conditions are satisfied;
• Purchaser requirements are satisfied;
Westinghouse shall maintain'documentation indicating the disposition of quality records.
Controlled DocumenVCopying Prohibited
Revision No.: 01 34
Westinghouse OAP
Revision Date: 1 O January 1996
• •
18. AUDITING
This section establishes a comprehensive system of planned and periodic audits to verify contract or
specification compliance. proper procedure implementation, and the determination of the effectiveness
of the OAP. The audit program consists of internal program audits, external audits of Westinghouse
subcontractors and internal audits of Westinghouse projects; and may include performance of audits
with Westinghouse clients. The program includes the following items:
• Audits of quality-related activities to ensure proper implementation of applicable elements of the
Westinghouse OAP, Westinghouse procedures, contract specifications, and appropriate codes and
standards.
• Audits of certain suppliers to ensure compliance with procurement documents as required.
• Annual management review and evaluation of the effectiveness and thoroughness of implementation
of the Westinghouse OAP.
• Audits performed to provide an objective evaluation of implementation of established requirements,
methods, and procedures.
• Audits performed to determine adequacy of OAP performance.
• Audits performed to verify that corrective action has been implemented and agreed-upon standards
and specifications are achieved.
18.1 Requirements
Measures shall be established and implemented to ensure that a system of planned and periodic audits
is performed to verify the compliance and effectiveness of all aspects of the Westinghouse OAP and
other applicable quality control programs.
18.2 Description
Quality records shall include an annual audit schedule, which shall be periodically updated. Project
audits will be recorded on project scheduling documents. Audits will be scheduled iri accordance with
key milestones or during one or more of the following periods:
• Prior to initiation of the activity to examine planning activities;
• During the activity to verify conformance to plans; and
• Near the end or after the activity to verify requirements have been met.
A checklist(s) will be prepared for each audit by QNQC personnel. The checklist(s) will identify the
following items:
• Scope and the requirements documents relevant to the audited activities;
• Audit team members;
• Organization and specific activities to be audited;
• Audit schedule;
Controlled DocumenVCopying Prohibited
Revtsion No.: 01 35
Westinghouse OAP
Revision Date: 1 O January 1996
• •
18.3 Personnel
QA/QC personnel who are independent of any direct responsibility for the activity to be audited will be
selected and assigned. QA/QC personnel selected for auditing assignments will have experience and/or
training commensurate with the scope, complexity or special nature of the activity to be audited.
18.4 Audits
QA/QC personnel will document the audit results, and management having responsibility in the area
audited shall review the documented audit results. Project management will take necessary action to
review and correct the deficiencies revealed by the audit. Deficient areas may be .re-audited when
corrections have been accomplished or during a subsequent audit.
Audits will include an evaluation of quality control practices, procedures and instructions, the
effectiveness of implementation and conformance with Westinghouse management directives and the
Westinghouse QAP. During the performance of these evaluations, the audits will include evaluation of
work activities, processes, products, personnel training and qualifications, and review of documents and
records.
18.5 Audit System
• Audits will be conducted on a scheduled and timely basis. The total scope of the Westinghouse
QAP will be audited on an annual basis.
• Suppliers or vendors audits for related materials or services will be conducted initially upon contract
award, and then every three years as a minimum.
• A pre-audit meeting (entrance interview) will be held by QA/QC personnel to make introductions as
appropriate, confirm the scope and plan of the audit, establish a tentative schedule, and establish
lines of communication.
• Objective evidence will be evaluated for conformance to the QAP requirements.
• A post-audit meeting (exit interview) will be held at the conclusion of the audit to review all findings
for clarity, correctness and for suitable corrective action. All conditions requiring immediate
corrective action shall be identified to the appropriate Westinghouse project manager, or to the
appropriate external organization management.
18.6 Audit Reports
QA/QC personnel shall document the audit activities and sign the audit report. The audit report will
contain sufficient information to be a stand-alone document and include what was examined, what was
found to be acceptable, and what was inadequate. The report will describe the following:
• The audit scope;
• Auditors names, organizations audited, and audit dates;
• Names of personnel interviewed during the audit, and those attending pre/post audit meetings;
• Summary of audit results, including any program deficiencies;
• Details of deficiencies an~ recommendations for corrective action;
Controlled OocumenVCopying Prohibited
Revision No.: 01 36
Westinghouse OAP
Revision Date: 1 O January 1996
• •
QNQC personnel shall issue the audit report. All reports must be transmitted to the audited organization
within two weeks after completion of the audit. All audit findings must be answered within thirty days
from the date of the audit report.
QNQC personnel will evaluate the audit response, verify its implementation when appropriate, and
accept or request further corrective action if the response or implementation is inadequate to prevent
recurrence of the deviation.
All audit finding responses will be reviewed and accepted by the appropriate QNQC personnel. Once
corrective action has been completed, authorized QNQC personnel will verify acceptable
implementation and completion of corrective action. A memorandum describing the corrective actions
and announcing the closure of the audit will be sent to appropriate management. The audit file will be
retained as a quality record.
Controlled Document/Copying Prohibited
Revision No.: 01 37
Westlnghouse OAP
Revision Dote: 1 O January 1996
•
•
Appendix G
,. ' . -, : ,: . 0
\
,!!. .·• . •!-" . t,
~ r
• • WM. GORDON DEAN, P.E.
Project Assignment: Design Manager
EDUCATION/TRAINING
S.S., Chemi_cal Engineering, University of Florida, 1983
OSHA 40-Hour Hazardous Waste Operations and Emergency Response Training
S U,J;f MARY
Mr. Dean has over 13 years of experience in the environmental field, including more than 6 years
with the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP). In his current position as
Technical Group Manager, Mr. Dean supervises all technical personnel in five Florida offices,
directs site remedial operations and evaluates the effectiveness of remedial actions. He specializes
in remedial system design, including recovery wells, air strippers, activated carbon adsorption,
catalytic oxidation, free product recovery, soil biodegradation, in situ intrinsic remediation, and
vacuum extraction. During his years with the Florida Department of Enviro~mental Protection
(FDEP, formerly the FDER), Mr. Dean was responsible for the preparation/review of remedial
investigations/feasibility studies (RI/FS), remedial design, contamination assessment reports
(CARs), and remedial action plans (RAPs) for CERCLA, RCRA and petroleum-contaminated
sites. He also provided field engineering supervision of contractors as an on-scene coordinator
(OSC) at over 30 CERCLA and other hazardous waste sites.
RELEVANT EXPERIENCE
■ Serves as Project Manager/Design Engineer for the Fairbanks Disposal Pit, an FOOT site
with four aquifers contaminated with chlorinated solvents. The site is regulated by
CERCLA/RCRA under an Administrative Consent Order. Designed Corrective Action Plans
for all four aquifers, including use of innovative, high-volume horizontal wells for the
surficial aquifer. Upon completion ofon-site activities by WRS, this site will be the first in
the Southeastern U.S. to achieve a soil clean-closure status from both FDEP and EPA. The
project has a remediation budget of over $20 million.
■ On-scene coordinator at over 30 CERCLA and hazardous waste sites.
■ Program Manager for three-year hazardous waste and drycleaning solvent program for the
FDEP. Involves remedial investigations/feasibility studies (RI/FS), remedial design (RD),
installation, and operation and maintenance of remediation systems at drycleaning sites
throughout Florida to clean up groundwater and soil contaminated with PCE, TCE and
DNAPLs.
■ Co-author of Chapter 62-770, Florida Administrative Code and author of "Guidelines for
Initial Remedial Actions at Petroleum Sites."
■ In work for FDEP, reviewed and approved RI/FSs, RDs, Contamination Assessment Reports
(CAR), and Remedial Action Plans (RAP).
• • WM. GORDON DEAN, P.E.
■ Designed over 50 groundwater recovery and treatment and/or soil treatment systems,
including recovery wells, high volume trench recovery, air strippers, activated carbon
adsorption, free product recovery, soil biodegradation, in-situ intrinsic remediation, and
horizontal and vertical vacuum extraction.
• Procured and managed a $24-million FDEP petroleum cleanup contract.
■ Designed and implemented innovative groundwater contamination plume capture and control
techniques during construction of Florida Department of Transportation projects. The control
systems allowed construction to proceed with little or no downtime, and precluded
exacerbation of contaminant plumes.
■ Presented papers and/or training courses at over two dozen national or state environmental
conferences.
PROFESSIONAL REGISTRA TIONSIAFFILIA TIONS
Professional Engineer, Florida (No. 40950)
Professional Engineer, Alabama (No. 18407)
Professional Engineer, Georgia (No. 19403)
Florida Engineering Society/National Society of Professional Engineers
National Council of Examiners of Engineers and Surveyors (No. 9661)
Certified OSHA (29 CFR 1910.120) Instructor
PU BL/CATIONS
Dean, G. and Berry, J., "Plume Capture during Construction," Proceedings Transportation
Research Board Annual Conference, January I 995.
Water Quality Impact Evaluation, Florida Department of Transportation Training Course
No. BT-05-009, June 1994.
Guidance Manual for Review of Petroleum Remedial Action Plans, Florida Department of
Environmental Regulation, October 1989.
Dean, G., "Initial Remedial Action, A Quick and Dirty Response," Petrogram, January 1989.
2 o/3
• •
WM. GORDON DEAN, P.E.
PRESENTATIONS
Florida Remediation Conference, November 1995, ls Pump and Trea/ Dead or Jusl
Misunderslood
FOOT Environmental Management Workshop, April 1995, Geophysical Surveys and !heir
fnlerprelalion
FOOT Environmental Management Workshop, April 1995, To Remediale or Nol lo Remediale
National Research Council, Transportation Research Board Conference, January 1995, Plume
Capture During Cons/rue/ion
FOOT Training Course No. BT-05-0009, June 1994, Waler Qualify lmpacl Evalumion
FOOT Environmental Management Workshop, May 1994, Conlaminarion Dewarering wilh Plume
Capllire
FOOT Environmental Management Workshop, May 1994, Environmental Laboratory Data
lnterpretalion
Florida Environmental Expo, October 1993, Expedited Remedial Ac/ion al the 1-595 and Davie
Blvd. Site: A Case Study
SPECTRA Engineering and Research Conference, July 1992, Technical Requirements for
Remedial Ac/ion, Moniloring Only, and No Further Ac/ion Plans
FDER Storage Tanks Program Annual Conference, June 1992, Applied Site Remediation
Technologies
FDER Storage Tanks Program Annual Conference, May 1991, Sire Remedialion Technology
ADDITIONAL TRAINING COURSES
Florida Remediation Conference, A Technical Conference Focused on Innovations and
Refinements in Treatment Technology, November 1995
Environmental Management Workshop, FOOT, April 1995
Transportation Research Board Annual Conference, National Research Council, January 1995
Environmental Management Workshop, FOOT, May 1994
Design and Construction of Soil Liners and Covers, American Society of Civil Engineers, May
1994
3 o/3
• •
ANDREW J. HOOPER, G.C.
Project Assignment: Field Superintendent/ QC Manager
EDUCATION/TRAINING
B.S., Civil Engineering, Auburn University, 1987
OSHA 40-Hour Hazardous Waste Operations and Emergency Response Training, 1994
OSHA 8-Hour Refresher Course (29 CFR 1910.120), annually
OSHA Management/Supervisor Training, 1996
Primavera Project Planner
NUCA Competent Person Training
SUl~fMAR Y
Mr. Hooper is a Florida-Certified General Contractor with over nine years of experience in civil
engineering, construction engineering and construction management. He has a strong background
in heavy construction projects, including roads, bridges, and dams, and extensive experience in
remediation system installation, operation and maintenance. His experience includes the
engineering and management of large-scale transportation projects for the Florida Department of
Transportation (FDOT).
RELEVANT EXPERIENCE
" Project Engineer/Construction Manager on a large-scale CERCLA site for the FDOT in
Fairbanks, Florida. Responsibilities included project (critical path) scheduling,
subcontractor scheduling and coordinating, groundwater treatment system piping
design, conceptual telemetry/SCADA system design, cost tracking, surveying and
production monitoring.
" Project Engineer/Construction Manager on remediation at Fike Chemical Superfund Site
in Nitro, West Virginia for U.S. EPA Region IV. Responsible for layout and installation
of a $550,000 storm water treatment facility. Coordinated purchase, delivery and
installation of the system; negotiated and coordinated subcontracts; managed installation
crew; and provided value engineering recommendations regarding system design.
" Project Engineer/Construction Manager on various FDOT District 11 and District Ill
environmental remediation projects. Responsibilities included project estimating, project
scheduling, report preparation, on-site management, personnel and equipment scheduling,
conceptual telemetry system design, coordination of subcontractors and material suppliers.
Project Manager/Project Engineer on the installation of an $18 million wastewater
collection and transmission system for the City of Cape Coral, Florida. Responsibilities
included project safety; estimating; design of support for excavation; engineering layout of
jack, bores, and sub-aqueous crossings; storm drainage/utility conflict resolution; storm
and sanitary structure layout; quantity tracking for payment to subcontractors and owners;
'
• •
ANDREW J. HOOPER, G.C.
review and coordination of submittals; subcontractor coordination and scheduling; and
production monitoring and procurement of materials.
Project Engineer on a $2.5 million bridge widening project for the FOOT Turnpike
Project. Responsibilities included supervision of field personnel, coordination of
subcontractors, project submittals, engineering layout and project close-out, surveying,
and quantity tracking for payment from owner.
Quality Control Engineer on a $3 million flood control structure for the U.S. Anny Corps
of Engineers on Lake Okeechobee, FL. Responsibilities included quality control of all on-
site work, surveying, and subcontractor payment.
" Storm Drainage/Utility Engineer for $12 million road widening project for FOOT in
Merritt Island. Responsibilities included utility crew safety, engineering layout for
installation of 12,000 LF of reinforced concrete pipe ranging in size from 18" to 72" in
diameter, storm drainage/utility conflict resolution, subcontractor supervision and
coordination, scheduling of on-site crews, and procurement of materials.
PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATIONS/AFFILIATIONS
Certified General Contractor, Florida (No. CG C057960), 1995
2o/2
• •
JOHN D. LEE
Project Assignment: Chief Operator
£DUCA TION/TRAINING
OSHA 40-Hour Hazardous Waste Operations and Emergency Response Training
OSHA 8-Hour Refresher Course (29 CFR 1910.120), annually
OSHA 8-hour Supervisory Course
Hazardous Materials Training Seminar, Treeo Center Environmental!fraining Programs
SUMMARY
Mr. Lee has 15 years of experience in environmental project supervision. He is directly in charge
of site work operations. He has supervised field activities during planned remediation projects and
emergency response site cleanups. Mr. Lee has extensive knowledge of on-site waste treatment
methods, including groundwater treatment, soil stabilization and solidification. In addition, he is
knowledgeable concerning site characterization requirements, materials excavation and removal,
and transportation and disposal.
RELEVANT EXPERIENCE
■ Supervisor in charge of clearing a 40-acre superfund site in North Florida in preparation for
soil sampling. Responsibilities included supervision of work crews, on-site incineration of
vegetation, coordinating air monitoring, surveying and gridding the site. Contamination was
formed by heavy metals from a battery recycling operation.
■ Supervisor in charge of neutralizing approximately I 50,000 gallons of acid sludge in an open
lagoon, Tampa, Florida. Directed solidification and excavation of the waste material in
preparation for on-site incineration.
■ Supervisor for decontamination of a pesticide storage warehouse and excavation of
contaminated soil in Tifton, Georgia. Responsibilities included oversight of containment
procedures, supervision of work crews, and preparation of wastes for disposal.
■ Supervisor for cleanup of a mercury spill in a warehouse in Miami, Florida. Performed
oversight for sweeping of a warehouse with mercury vacuums, use of specialized dusting
powders, and monitoring of ambient mercury levels.
■ Supervisor for cleanup of affected asphalt, soil and storm drains following a transformer
exploding in Valdosta, Georgia. Provided job oversight of sampling, project documentation.
Site Supervisor for Alabama Highway Department project to remediate property formerly
used by a dry cleaning operation. The property was contaminated with volatile and semi-
volatile organic compounds, including perchloroethylene, trichloroethylene, and other
solvents. Directed all field operations including excavation of 5,300 tons of soil, removal of
• •
JOHN D. LEE
three underground storage tanks, structure demolition, water control and treatment, and
asbestos removal.
■ Site Supervisor during the cleanup of a six-acre site of abandoned transfonners in Baldwin,
Florida. Directed all field operations including assessing and staging of transformers;
decontamination of transformers using solvents, pressure and steam cleaning; characterization
of material in storage tanks, tank cleaning, site gridding and soil sampling, excavation of
contaminated soil, water treatment.
■ Site Supervisor for decontamination of transformer vault in the Library of Congress following
a fire. Perfonned verification sampling, and coordinated work with building occupants and
security personnel. Directed waste transportation logistics and prepared required
documentation.
Site Supervisor for decontamination of drainage lines contaminated with radioactive material
at nuclear power plant in South Florida. Responsibilities included utilization of a high-
pressure, low-volume pipe laser.
■ Foreman on a drum burial site in Largo, Florida. Responsibil_ities included supervision of
drum removal, treatment of water contaminated with volatile organics and metals, and on-site
compatibilization of drum wastes. Directed loading of bulk solid material for disposal.
■ Foreman City Chemical Superfund site in Orlando, Florida. Responsibilities included
oversight of tank cleaning, solidification of wastes and thennal destruction of contaminated
soil.
■ Foreman for remediation activities at Smith Farm in Shepardsville, Kentucky for U.S. EPA
Region IV. Responsibilities included oversight of loading and excavating drums with
unknown contents, bulking of materials from over 2,000 drums, excavation of contaminated
soil, site grading and restoration.
■ Foreman for project involving the removal of arsenic-contaminated sludge from a pit in
Miami, Florida, and decontamination of affected trucks and equipment.
■ Foreman for project involving excavation and removal of drums, consolidation of flammable
liquids and bulking of solid wastes at Distler Fann, Jefferson County, Kentucky. Perfonned
oversight for the removal and segregation of approximately 3,000 lab packs and shock-
sensitive materials as well as separating, classifying and repackaging lab packs of toxic,
corrosive and radioactive materials.
■ Foreman for project involving recovery and removal of drums, including shock-sensitive
materials and gas cylinders, following a fire at the Chemical Control Site in Elizabeth, New
Jersey. Responsibilities also included groundwater recovery and treatment.
LEE.DOC-18-Mar-97-Rev: 26 2of2
• WILLIAM E. NORTON, P.E.
Project Assignment: Project Manager
EDUCATION/TRAINING
M.S., Civil Engineering, Marquette University, 1978
B.S., Civil Engineering, University of Missouri, 1972
•
OSHA 40-Hour Hazardous Waste Operations and Emergency Response (HAZWOPER) Training
(29 CFR 1910.120), 1993
OSHA 8-hour Refresher Course, annually
SUMMARY
Mr. Norton has over 30 years of environmental experience, principally with the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers. His experience is broad-based in scope, ranging from site characterization to remedial
system design, construction and operation. He has extensive experience in the United States with
local, state and federal officials in remedial planning and the management of large-scale hazardous,
toxic and radioactive waste (HTRW) programs. He possesses in-depth knowledge of regulatory
requirements for hazardous materials management, landfill operations, recycling operations,
underground storage tanks'(USTs) and wetlands restoration. Mr. Norton also has managed large-
scale environmental remediation programs in Europe.
RELEVANT EXPERIENCE
■ Manager, Westinghouse Remediation Service's Southern Region (January 1996 -present).
Responsible for remedial operations in nine states in the southeastern United States. Supervises
approximately 50 permanent employees, including professional engineers, scientists, technicians and
equipment operators. The Southern Region plans and completes 20 to 30 projects per year ranging
from small ($10,000} to large (over $1 million) projects. ·
■ Program Manager for WRS' support to the State of Georgia under the Hazardous Sites Response Act
(1994 -present). This is a relatively new program for the state, started in December 1994, with 15
projects assigned to WRS thus far. This total service contract requires site investigations, work plan
development and project execution. These state Superfund sites vary considerably, ranging from
remediation of an abandoned oil recycling facility to site assessments for groundwater and wetlands
contamination.
■ Project Engineer at the Acme Superfund Site in Rockford, Illinois (1993 -1994). From 1960 to 1973,
the Acme site served as a disposal site for paints, oils and still bottoms from a solvent reclamation
plant. The site, later designated for remediation under CERCLA, was contaminated with volatile
organic compounds (VOCs), semi-volatile organic compounds (SVOCs), polychlorinated
biphenyls (PCBs), and metals. The goal of this project was the remediation of 6,000 tons of soil and
sludge via on-site low temperature thermal stripping (L TIS) such that residual contaminant levels
were below the limits for on-site landfilling identified in the Record of Decision (ROD). Mr. Norton
provided engineering design and technical support to this project, which included the
application of Westinghouse's low-temperature Thermal Desorption Unit (TDU) to treat the
material for organics. This unit, which also passed "Proof-of-Process" as part of this project for the
U.S. EPA Region V, was designed and fabricated by Westinghouse's Innovative Technology Group, -
of which Mr. Norton is an integral part.
■ Technical Program Manager for a pilot-scale soil washing demonstration for Beazer East, Inc. at the
Koppers/Feather River Superfund Site in Oroville, California (1993 -1994). This wood-treating facility
consisted of over 250,000 tons of soils contaminated with various organic and inorganic compounds.
WILLI AM E. NOR TO N'!'P. E. •
The client was under a ROD to treat 200,000 cubic yards of soil via ex-situ soil washing. Cleanup
criteria were the most stringent criteria set for Superfund remediation work of this type. The
demonstration was conducted using the Westinghouse Soil Washing Unit (SWU). Mr. Norton was
responsible for directing/overseeing the soil washing demonstration to determine the effectiveness of
this technology at the site. The results of this demonstration established the SWU capabilities to
remediate soils containing-pentachlorophenol, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, arsenic and
chromium.
■ Project Engineer during remediation of property associated with a former dry cleaning operation
(1993). This project, under contract to the Alabama Highway Department, was essential so that
construction of the 1-165 extension into the City of Mobile could continue on schedule. Soils at this
site were contaminated with volatile and semi-volatile organic compounds including perchloroethylene,
trichloroethylene and other solvents associated with the former dry cleaning operation. Site
operations included excavation of 5,300 tons of soil, removal of USTs, structure demolition,
water control and treatment, and asbestos removal. Mr. Norton was an integral part of a team of
Westinghouse engineers, who developed and submitted a Value Engineering Change Proposal for
off-site thermal treatment. This process destroyed the chlorinated organics to the same treatment
standards but processed more tons per day at a lower cost than incineration. This treatment option
saved the client over $1.6 million and reduced the project schedule from 90 days to 70 days, a
benefit to the federal and state governments.
■ Director of Engineering and Housing (DEH) at Fort Rucker, Alabama. Responsible for implementation
and development of Installation Restoration Program (/RP) at this facility as part of the Defense
Environmental Restoration Program (DERP). Responsible for investigating and identifying sites to be
presented to the U.S. Congress for inclusion in the IRP program. Investigated 106 sites that
resulted in 44 projects listed as priority for IRP. Through this assignment, Mr. Norton gained
extensive experience managing programs in the following areas:
=> Site characterization for remedial design;
=> Underground storage tank (UST) removal;
=> Structure decontamination;
=> Asbestos abatement;
=> Landfill closure; and
=> Groundwater recovery and treatment.
■ In this position, Mr. Norton was responsible for operations and maintenance of the installation. He··
supervised a work force of over 700 that included professional engineers and environmental and
natural resource professionals. As a result of this responsibility, Mr. Norton has developed substantial
experience related to the following:
=> Project development and management;
=> Contract administration; and
=> NEPA and other environmental documentation requirements.
■ Mr. Norton was nominated as DEH Executive of the Year by the Army's Major Training Command
(1990 -1992).
■ DEH for the U.S. Military Community in Bamberg, West Germany (1987 -1990). Responsible for all
elements of environmental management related to that facility. Charged with operation and
maintenance of facilities, master planning, environmental compliance, services contracting, and
utilities procurement. Supervised the development and implementation of the RCRA Facility
Investigations and the Corrective Measures Studies for two U.S. Army installations. Developed a
thorough understanding of European, particularly German, environmental regulatory issues. Awarded
Legion of Merit by the U.S. Army, Europe.
NORTON.DOC-18-Mar-97-Rev: 66 2of4
•
■ Civil Engineer for Design of Airfield and Support Facilities in Saudi Arabia (1984 -1987). Responsible
for the design and construction of aviation training complexes for the Saudi Army, working with
numerous government agencies and NE firms.
■ Research and Development Coordinator for the Geotechnical Laboratory Waterways Experiment
Station, Vicksburg, Mississippi (1981 -1984). Conducted research in geotechnical engineering and
performed dynamic analysis of Sardis Dam in Mississippi. Pioneered the use of the cone
penotrometer for the detection of contamination.
■ Project Engineer for the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Bankhead Lock and Dam near
Birmingham, Alabama (1973 -1975). Project responsibilities included contract management,
construction quality assurance, value engineering analysis and design review.
■ Company Commander/Construction Officer for the Engineer Construction Units, Republic of Vietnam.
Assigned to units constructing roads, bridges and base camps.
PROFESSIONAL REGIS TRA TIONS/AFFILIA T/ONS
Registered Professional Engineer in Tennessee, Illinois, Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Louisiana, North
Carolina and Pennsylvania
PUBLICATIONS
WES Technical Report GS-83-15. "In Situ Determination of Liquefaction Potential Using the PQS
Probe."
"Management of Stormwater Runoff from Uncontrolled Hazardous Waste Sites," Proceedings of the
3rd Environmental Technology Conference, Atlanta, GA, October 1993.
"Treatment of Soils Affected by Wood Preserving Wastes Using the Westinghouse Soil Washing
Technology," Proceeding of the Superfund XIV Conference, December 1993.
EMPLOYMENT HISTORY
1993 to present:
1967 -1992:
Westinghouse Remediation Services, Inc.
( 404) 299-4650
Position: Manager, WRS' Southern Region
Reports to: Carey Daniel
U.S.' Army Corps of Engineers
Position: Director of Engineering and Housing and other positions
Reported to: Installation Commander
PROFESSIONAL REFERENCES
Mr. David Delaney, Program Manager
OHM Corporation
[phone]
Mr. Tim Cash
Georgia Department of Natural Resources -Environmental Protection Division
( 404) 657-8600
Mr. Robert L. Peterson, P.E., President
RLPC Environmental Technology Support
[phone]
NORTON.DOC-18-Mar-97-Rev: 66 3of4
This page is intentionally left blank.
NORTON.DOC-18-Mar-97-Rev: 66 4 o/4