NCD095458527_19921001_FCX Inc. (Statesville)_FRBCERCLA RI_Phase I Remedial Investigation Report-OCR

f'
I --. ., .~ -;
I ·.·i
' I
I
I
I
I
I )
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
. ' )
I\
\
EPA REGION ;IV
PHASE I REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION REPORT
FOR THE
FCX -STATESVILLE SUPERFUND SITE
STATESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA RECEIVED
OCTOBER 1992
U. S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
REGION IV, ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DIVISION
HAZ~RDOUS WASTE SECTION
960 COLLEGE STATION ROAD
ATHENS, GEORGIA 30613-0801
'AUG 07 1995
SUPERFUND SECTION
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
\
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLE OF CJNTENTS
LIST OF FIGURES
LIST OF TABLES
LIST OF APPENDICES
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
SECTION 1.0 INTRODUCTION
1.1 Purpose of Report
1.2
1. 3
Site Background
1.2.1 Facility and Locale
1.2.2 Site Description
1.2.3 Site Ownership and Operational History
1.2.3.l Chronological Development of Site 1.2.3.2 On-Site Pesticide Burial, 1966 1.2.3.3 Additional On-site Burial
1.2.4
1. 2. 5
1. 2. 6
Licensed EPA Establishment
NPL Listing
Human Population Survey
Summary of Past Investigations
1.3.1 Fred C. Hart Associates, Inc.,
Page
i
iv
vi
vii
vi.ii
1-1
1-1
1-1
1-4
1-7
1-7
1-10
1-10
1-12
1-12
1-12
1-12
February 1986 1-13 1.3.2 NCDHR,
May 1986 1-16 1 . .3.3 EPA (Weston•SPER) Emergency Response,
January 1989 1-16 l.:l.4 EPA (Weston•SPER) Emergency Response,
August 1989 1-18 1.3.5 EPA (O.H. Materials) Emergency Response, January 1990 1-20 1.2.6 NUS Screening Site Inspection, Burlington Industries, 1990 1-20
SECTION 2.0 SAMPLING LOCATIONS AND RATIONALE 2-1
2.1 Sampling Areas
2.1.1
2. 1. 2
2. 1. 3
2. 1. 4
2. L 5
Soil
Surface Water and Sediment
Ground water
Aquifer Properties
Contaminant Source Investigation
(Continued on next page)
i
2-1
2-1
2-26
2-28
2-28
2-31
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
\
TABLE OF CONTENTS (Cont.)
SECTION 2.0 (Cont.)
2.2 Sample Identification
2.3 Sample Collection and Handling
2.4 Sample Analysis
2.5 Quality Assurance
:!.5.1 Organization and Responsibilities
2.5.2 Sample Collection
;: . 5. 3 Analytical QA/QC
::.5.4 Precision, Accuracy, Representativeness,
Completeness and Comparability
2.6 lnvestigation Derived Waste Management
SECTION 3.C PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF THE STUDY AREA
3.1 Environmental Setting
3.1.1 Landforms
3.1.2 Surface Waters
3.1.3 Geology and Soils
3.1.3.1 Regional Geology and Area Soils 3.1.3.2 Site-Specific Geology and Soils 3.1.4 Ground water
3.1.4.1 Regional Hydrogeology
3.1.4.2 Aquifer Use
3.1.4.3 Site-Specific Hydrogeology
3.1.5 Meteorology
SECTION 4.0 NATURE AND EXTENT OF CONTAMINATION
4.1 Soil
4 .. 1.1 Background soil
4.1.2 Soils, Areas 1, 2 and 3
4.1.2.1 Metals
4.1.2.2 Pesticides
4.1.2.2.1 4,4'-DDT, 4,4'-DDD
4.1.2.2.2
4.1.2.2.3
,J.l.2.2.4
and 4,4'-DDE
Chlordane
Dieldrin
Other Pesticide Compounds
(Continued on next page)
ii
2-31
2-33
2-34
2-34
2-34
2-35
2-36
2-41
2-41
3-1
3-1
3-1
3-1
3-1
3-1
3-3
3-5
3-5
3-6
3-6
3-9
4-1
4-1
4-1
4-38
4-38
4-50
4-50
4-56
4-56
4-57
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
TABLE OF CONTENTS (Cont.)
SECTION 4.0 (Cont.)
4 . 2
4 . 3
4.4
4.1.2.3 Extractable Organic Compounds
4.1.2.3.1 carcinogenic PAH Compounds 4.1.2.3.2 Specified Non-Carcino-
genic PAHs
4.1.2.3.3 Other Extractable Organic
Compounds
4.1.2.4 Purgeable Organic Compounds
Ground Water
4.2.1 Background Ground Water Quality
4.2.1.1 Metals
4.2.1.2 Organic Compounds
•l.2.2 On-Site Monitoring Wells
4.2.2.1 Metals
4.2.2.2 Pesticide/PCB Compounds
4.2.2.3 Extractable Organic
Compounds
4.2.2.4 Purgeable Organic Compounds
4.2.3 Carnation Well
4.2.4 Potable Wells
Eediment
4 . 3 . 1
4 • 3. 2
4 . 3 • 3
4. 3. 4
Metals
Pesticides/PCBs
Extractable Organic Compounds
Purgeable Organic Compounds
Surface Water
4.4.1 Metals
4.4.2 Pesticides
4.4.3 Extractable Organic Compounds
4.4.4 Purgeable Organic Compounds
4-59
4-60
4-62
4-62
4-68
4-68
4-70
4-70
4-79
4-79
4-79
4-80
4-83
4-84
4-86
4-87
4-87
4-92
4-94
4-94
4-97
4-97
4-99
4-99
4-99
4-104
5.0 CONTAM:CNANT FATE AND TRANSPORT -

-

-
TO BE INCLUDED IN PHASE II ADDENDUM TO REPORT
6. 0 BASELPlE RISK ASSESSMENT -

-

-
TO BE INCLUDED IN PHASE I I ADDENDUM TO REPORT I REFERENCES
I
I
I
iii
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
t
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure Number
1-1
1-2
1-3
1-4
1-5
1-6
1-7
1-8
1-9
1-10
1-11
1-12
2-1
2-2
2-3
2-4
2-5
2-6
3-1
3-2
3-3
4-1
4-2
4-3
4-4
4-5
4-6
4-7
4-8
4-9
4-10
4-11
4-12
4-13
4-14
4-15
Area Location Map
site Location Map
Site Map, current
Site Map, 1950-1951
Site Map, 1969
Trenc:h Investigation Area
Fred C. Hart Study Results,
Pestl.cides ·
Fred C. Hart Study Results,
Volatile Organics
NCDHR Investigation Results
Weston Results, August 1989
OH Materials Results, January
NUS SSI Results, August 1990
Soil Sample Location Map
Background Soil Location Map
1990
surface Water and Sediment Sample Locatio Map On-Site Monitoring Well Location Map
carnation and Potable Well Location Map
Exploratory Boring Location Map
Area Surface Water Drainage Map
Area Geologic Map
site ,;round Water Contour Map
Chromium Distribution in Soil,
Concentrations Exceeding Mean
Lead Distribution in Soil,
Conce11trations Exceeding Mean
Potasf;ium Distribution in Soil,
Concentrations Exceeding an Order of Magnitude Above Mean Concentration
Calcium Distribution in Soil,
Concentrations Exceeding Mean
Zinc. Distribution in Soil,
Concentrations Exceeding Mean
Arsenic Distribution in Soil
Mercury Distribution in Soil
Cadmium Distribution in Soil
Selenium Distribution in Soil
DDT Distribution in Soil
DDD Distribution in Soil
DDE Distribution in Soil
Chlordane Distribution in Soil
Dieldrin Distribution in Soil
Total Carcinogenic PAH Concentrations
in Soil
(Continued on next page)
iv
1-2
1-3
1-5
1-8
1-9
1-11
1-14
1-15
1-17
1-19
1-21
1-22
2-23
2-24
2-27
2-29
2-30
2-32
3-2
3-4
3-8
4-40
4-41
4-43
4-44
4-45
4-4 7
4-48
4-49
4-51
4-52
4-53
4-54
4-57
4-58
4-61
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
LIST OF FIGURES (Cont,)
Figure Number
4-16
4-17
4-18
4-19
4-20
4-21
4-22
4-23
4-24
4-25
4-26
4-27
4-28
Pyrene Distribution and Concentration
in Soil
Fluoranthene Distribution and Concentration
in Soil
Anthracene Distrib~tion and Concentration
in Soil
Pent11chlorophenol, Distribution and Concentration
in Soil
Tricl1loroethylene and Tetrachloroethylene
Concentration in Soil
PestJ.cide Concentrations, Monitoring Wells
Purgeable organic Compound Concentrations,
Monit:oring Wells
Metals Concentrations, Sediment Samples
Pesti.cide Concentrations, Sediment Samples
Extra.ctable Organic Compound Concentrations,
Sediment Samples
Purgeable Organic Compound Concentrations,
Sediment Samples
Pesticide Concentrations, Surface Water Samples Purgeable Organic Compound Concentrations,
surface Water Samples
V
4-63
4-64
4-65,
4-67
4-68
4-82
4-85
4-93
4-95
4-96
4-98
4-103
4-105
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
LIST OF TABLES
Table Number
2-1 Soil Samp',e Locations and Descriptions
2-2 surface W1~er and Sediment Sample Locations and Descr, :pt ions
2-3 Ground Wat~r Sample Locations and Descriptions
2-4 QA/QC Samf ,1e Descriptions
2-5 Analytical· Data Summary, QA/QC Samples,
May and Jtne
2-6 Analytical Data Summary, QA/QC Samples,
July
4-1
4-2
4-3
4-4
4-5
4-6
4-7
4-8
4-9
4-10
4-11
4-12
4-13
Soil Sample Summary
Analytical Data Summary, Soils, Area 1
Analytical Data Summary, Soils, Area 2
Analytical Data Summary, Soils, Area 3
Ground Wat~r Sample summary
Potable Well Sample summary
Analytical Data Summary, Monitoring Wells
Analytical Data Summary, Potable and Process Wells Ground Wat=r Insitu Parameter summary
Sediment Simple Summary
Analytical Data Summary, Sediment Samples
Surface Wa' :er Sample Summary
Analytical Data Summary,
Surface wa· :er
vi
2-2
2-18
2-20
2-37
2-39
2-40
4-2
4-5
4-10
4-28
4-71
4-74
4-75
4-77
4-78
4-88
4-90
4-100
4-102
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
LIST OF APPENDICES
Appendix A -Well Construction Diagram and Logs
Appendix B -Complete Analytical Data
• Soil
• Ground water
• Sediment
• Surface Water
• QA/QC
vii
\
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
During the summer of 1991, primarily in the months of June,
July and September, Phase I of the remedial investigation at the
FCX-Statesville Superfund site, in Statesville, North Carolina,
was conducted, The site was ranked and included on the National
Priority List of Superfund Sites because of pesticide
contamination observed in ground water beneath the site. In
addition to the pesticides detected in samples from on-site
monitoring wells, significant chlorinated solvent contamination
had also been observed.
The sampling program for the remedial investigation
consisted of-extensive on-site and off-site soil sampling, for
both surface and subsurface soil (199 samples), as well as ground
water sampling from on-site monitoring wells and off-site process
and potable wells (17 samples). Surface water and sediment
samples (21 samples) were also collected from locations within
the potentially affected wet-weather and perennial drainage
pathways associated with run-off from the site. An exploratory
boring effort was also conducted at selected locations in an
attempt to locate pesticide burial trenches reported to be
present beneath the floor of the warehouse.
The most significant findings resulting from the Phase I
field investigation include:
Pesticide Contamination of On-Site Soils -The results
of soil sampling indicate that significant soil
contamination exists at the site. The contamination is
predominantly DDT and its degradation products, DDD and
DDE. The most highly contaminated area is beneath the
floor of the upper section of the warehouse, in the
general area where an in-ground pesticide mixing pit
was originally located, prior to construction of the
new building. Concentrations of DDT as high as 830,000-
ug/kg were reported for this area. DDD and DDE
viii
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
\
concentrations were generally lower than those observed
for DDT and their respective distribution patterns were
somewhat more restricted. ~ignificant contamination is
generally restricted to the upper two feet of soil, but
may be as deep·as four feet or greater in the area of
highest contamination. Chlordane (and its consti-
tuents) and dieldrin were also detected. High
detection limits for chlordane and other pesticides
associated with the DDT compounds, however, do not
permit a valid characterization of the extent of these
compounds. Only minor, isolated occurrences of DDT
compounds and chlordane were observed in samples
collected from off-site areas. These do not appear to
be in any way significant.
Chlorinated Purgeable Organic Contamination in On-Site
Soils -Trichloroethylene and tetrachloroethylene were
the only significant purgeable organic compounds
detected in soil samples collected for the
investigation. The detected concentrations are
generally low, less than 15 ug/kg, but are significant
because their apparent association with a chlorinated
solvent ground water contaminant plume located beneath
the site. Isolated occurrences of other compounds,
such as acetone and chlorobenzene were detected, but do
not have any significant bearing on future potential
remediation activities at the site.
Pesticide Contamination of Ground Water -Samples from
on-site monitoring wells indicate that both the
surficial (saprolite) and bedrock portions of the
ground water system beneath the site are contaminated
with pesticides, primarily lindane and the other BHC
compounds, as well as endrin ketone and chlordane.
Chlorinated Solvent Contamination of Ground Water -A
variety of chlorinated solvents were detected in ground
ix
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
water samples from both on-site monitoring wells and
the process well located on the carnation property west
of the site. The most significant contamination
observed is that of tetrachloroethylene, with
concentrations in excess of 100 ug/1 being detected.
Based on the observed ground water flow direction and
the pattern of ground water contamination, the
contamination appears to originate from the Burlington
Industries facility north of the site.
Chlorinated Solvent Contamination of Surface Water -
Although surface water and sediment samples appear to
indicate that there is not a significant problem with
any_form of contamination that might be associated with
the FCX site, significant chlorinated solvent
contamination was detected in surface water samples
collected at a location immediately north of Burlington
Industries. Specifically, tetrachloroethylene was
detected in a seep sample collected at a stream head at
a concentration similar to that observed in samples
from on-site monitoring wells, indicating a significant
ground water contamination problem, located not only
beneath the FCX site, but also beneath much of the
entire Burlington Industries facility.
Exploratory Boring Results -An extensive effort was
put forth to locate the alleged pesticide-burial
trenches. This effort consisted of the borings
associated with the 27 soil sampling locations within
the warehouse, as well as nine deep, power-augered
exploratory borings. Little or no significant material
was found to indicate the presence of buried packaged
material. Additional borings will be attempted during
subsequent phases of the remedial investigation to
further attempt to locate this material.
X
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
\
Based on these findings, and without a baseline risk
assessment or fate and transport analysis of site conditions, the
following conclusions and recommendations are made:
1. Off-site and on-site soils appear to have been
adequately characterized, with respect to most of the TCL/TAL
compounds, in both horizontal and vertical extent. High
quantification limit non-detects in samples containing high DDT
concentrations prevented a full characterization of chlordane and
dieldrin, as well as other non-DDT related pesticide compounds.
Contaminants of concern (COCs) 'for soils could probably be
restricted to several pesticides, primarily DDT, DOE, DOD,
chlordane and dieldrin. This list may be reduced or expanded
upon completion of the risk assessment and the fate and transport
analysis.
At this time little sampling is recommended to provide the
expanded characterization for chlordane and dieldrin. A review
of analytical results for samples containing DDT at concentra-
tions near the preliminary remediation goals indicates that the I quantification limits for chlordane and dieldrin are sufficiently
low to allow identification of concentrations that pose a risk to
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
human health or the environment. Collection of a small number of
samples for chlordane analyses may be warranted to investigate
the source of the high concentrations reported by the state in
1986.
2. The extent of ground water contamination has not been
fully delineated at this time. A significant pesticide and
chlorinated solvent ground water contamination problem, both in
the shallow surficial and deeper bedrock portion of the aquifer,
exists at the downgradient extent of the property boundary. The
chlorinated solvent aspect of contamination extends, primarily in
the bedrock portion of the ground water system, beyond the
property boundaries in all directions from the site, except for
perhaps the area immediately east of the site. cocs for ground
water appear to be primarily lindane and the other BHC compounds,
xi
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
endrin ketone, chlordane and its constituents, tetrachloro-
ethylene, trichloroethylene, 1,1-dichloroethane, 1,1-dichlor-
oethene, carbon tetrachloride, chloroform, chloromethane and cis-
1,2-dichloroethene. The source of the sol~ents appears to be
from off-site. Additional characterization is required.
3. The site hydrogeology has not been fully
characterized at this time. The remaining characterization
activities will be conducted during Phase II of the remedial
investigation.
4. To date, attempts to locate the alleged buried
trenches have proven unsuccessful. Further efforts are
warranted to locate the trenches. Phase II of the investigation
should involve further borings to attempt to locate these
trenches.
xii
D
I 1.0 INTRODUCTION
I
I
I
I
I
I
1.1 Purpose of Report
The purpose of this report is to present the findings of the
Phase I remedial investigation conducted at the FCX-Statesville
Superfund NPL site in Statesville, Iredell County, North Carolina
(Figure 1-1). This investigation was conducted at various times
during the summer of 1991, primarily in June, July and September.
Supplementary investigations, constituting Phase II of the
remedial investigation, are planned for June 1992 to provide
additional soil and ground water characterization. Based on the
results and findings described in this Phase I report,
recommendations are offered for further site characterization and
other actions, as appropriate.
I The investigation was conducted in accordance with a Work
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Plan/Project Operations Plan (POP) developed prior to the
investigation to guide the remedial investigation sampling
activities (1). The POP and this remedial investigation report
were prepared in accordance with the Guidance on Remedial Invest-
igations Under CERCLA (2).
1.2 Site Background
1. 2. 1 Facility and Locale
The FCX-Statesville site (FCXS) is located on Highway 90
approximately 1.5 miles west of downtown Statesville at the
intersection of Phoenix Street and West Front Street (Figure 1-
2). The area is characterized by the presence of light and heavy
industry, small businesses, residential neighborhoods and a
3Chool in the immediate vicinity. The coordinates of the site
are latitude 35° 47' 11" north, longitude 80° 54' 58" west. (3)
1-1
- - - - - - - - - - - - - --l!!!!!!!I l!!l!!I == liiiiiiii
IREDELL COUNTY
77
STATESVILLE
~EPA
FIGURE 1-1
AREA LOCATION MAP
FCX-STATESVILLE SITE
STATESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA
D
g
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
- 3 -
.,. -
):_ ) ' . ~ ., ~ ".
·. I ' ;,'·:: r:'._1 J •• -·-.
I ._-.. / ·-•-•;..:.....,· -
FIGURE 1-2
SITE LOCATION MAP
FCX-STATESVILLE
STATESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA
n
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
The site, shown in Figure 1-3, comprises about 5.5 acres and
is bounded by the Norfolk-Southern Railroad and Burlington
Industries (formerly Beaunit Mills) to the north, the Carnation
Milk Company to the west, a small business/residential area
immediately south of West Front Street, and a pre-fabricated
utility shed sales lot on the east side of Phoenix Street.
1 . 2 . 2 Site Description
The Site, defined as the area south of the Norfolk-Southern
Railroad, east of the Carnation Milk Company property, west of
Phoenix Street, and north of West Front Street, is currently
abandoned. Figure 1-3 shows the location and identification of
site buildings and structures, as well as prominent off-site
structures.
The dominant on-site structure is the warehouse located on
the western half of the property. It consists of two attached
structures, an upper building, constructed in 1969 or 1970, and a
smaller, lower building constructed in 1982. (4) The area south
of the warehouse, except for a narrow grass strip along the
sidewalk, is totally paved.
.The eastern half of the Site is dominated by a large
concrete pad, six-to seven-inches thick, 62-feet wide and 190-
feet long, extending approximately 190 feet from the eastern end
of the warehouse along the north property line. Immediately
south of the pad is a large area covered almost entirely with
approximately six to twelve inches of crushed, compacted gravel.
Several smaller areas within this area, mostly tractor trailer
pads and parking areas, are paved with either concrete or
asphalt.
The area thus described, except for the paved area between
the warehouse and the street, is completely fenced, most with
chain-link fencing. The fence is in good condition and access is
gained, via Phoenix Street, through a 36-foot wide gate along the
1-4
--- - - - - --· - - - - -111!!!!1 .. 1!11!1 == ;;a
CARNATION
MILK
COMPANY
8
l ,
j
' ,
j
RESIDENTIAL
AREA
FIGURE 1-3
SITE DIAGRAM
(SHOv.1NG ON-SITE MONITORING WELLS)
' FCX-STA TESVILLE
STATESVILLE. NORTH CAROLINA
125
I
•
FCX
BURLINGTON
INDUSTRIES
APPROXIMATE SCALE
0
-....J --
1 Inch =-125 ft.
,,,
I
@I -MONITORING \II0..1..S
&EPA
\
R eastern end of the Site. The gate is locked with a heavy chain
and padlock.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
A small, vacant two-story brick buildjng is located at the
southeastern corner of the site just beyond the eastern fence.
This building served as offices while FCXS was in operation.
Most of the area between the eastern fence and Phoenix Street,
except for that area occupied by the building, is covered with
grass.
There are two known underground tanks present at the site, a
7,500 gallon gasoline storage tank and a 10,000 gallon diesel
fuel storage tank. These are located in the front parking area
near the fuel pumps, near where the upper and lower sections of
the warehouses join. These tanks were checked during the
remedial investigation and were determined to be essentially
empty. The east tank contained 0.67 feet of water; the west tank
contained 0.05 feet of petroleum product floating above 0.22 feet
of water. There has been no reported leakage from the tanks nor
does ground water data from nearby monitoring wells indicate that
any significant leakage has occurred. (5)
A total of twelve ground water monitoring wells, shown on
Figrire 1-3, are also present at the site. Four were installed in
1976 as part of a pre-purchase environmental evaluation conducted
for Southern States Cooperative (4). Four were installed in 1989
in conjunction with the removal action conducted by US-EPA
(6) (7), and four were installed in June 1991 for the remedial
investigation.
1-6
I
D
D
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
\
1.2.3 Site Ownership and Operational History
1.2.3.1 Chronological Development of the site
Based on available file information, it appears that FCXS
began operations at the site as an agricultural supply distri-
bution center about 1940 and continued to operate the site until
bankruptcy in September 1986. Prior commercial use of the site,
if any, is not known. It appears that two main activities were
conducted at the site. Initial operations consisted of the
formulation, repackaging, warehousing and distribution of farm
chemicals, primarily pesticides and fertilizer, and the milling
and sales of feed grains. This acti~ity was initially restricted
to the eastern two-thirds of the site. Figure 1-4 shows the
approximate locations and identifications of site buildings
present during this time. The year of the photograph for which
Figure 1-4 was based is estimated to be 1950-1951, based on
observation of vehicles present on-site. Initial operations also
consisted of the cleaning and treatment of seed grains, appar-
ently with mercu1y-containing compounds. (4) (5) (8)
At some time after 1950-1951, the site underwent several
structural and operational changes. The western half of the
horse-shoe shaped building in the center of the site was
demolished and the upper (western) portion of the current
warehouse was constructed, extending to near the property line
with the adjoining Carnation Milk Company property. The smaller
building adjoining the feed milling and bagging buildings, at the
intersection of Phoenix Street and the railroad tracks near the
northeastern corner of the site, was also removed. Repackaging
of liquid pesticides ceased in 1966. Dust repackaging was
discontinued in 1969. This was the status of the site in 1969,
based on historical aerial photography. Figure 1-5 shows the
locations and identifications of the site buildings in 1969. The
only known significant operational and structural changes that
occurred after this time was the repackaging of rat bait in the
1-7
--------------l!!!!l!!I l!!B!I 1111111 lil!mil liiiiiil
CARNATION MILK
COMPANY
RESIDENTIAL
AREA
FIGURE 1-4
SITE MAP, 1950-51
FCX-ST A TES VILLE
STATESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA
WAREHOUSE
AND DISTRIBUTION
FCX
BEAUNIT
MILLS
0
V
APPROXIMATE SCALE
62.5 125
f f
( IN FEET )
t Inch "" 125 ft.
OFFICE(}.
~EPA
- - - - - - - - - - --l!!!m !!!!!I == --
CARNATION
MILK
COMPANY
" I
" I
" I
BEAUNIT
MILLS
-'< FCX-STATESVILLE
8
RESIDENTIAL
AREA
FIGURE 1-5
SITE MAP, 1969
FCX-ST A TESVILLE
STATESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA
NEW WAREHOUSE
AND DISTRIBUTION
APPROXIMATE SCALE
125 0 62.0 k-...J -' ( IN FEET )
1 Inch • 125 ft.
120
I
TANKS
RAIL CAR
UNLOADING SHED
~EPA
I
H
n
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
early 1980's and construction of the lower portion of the
warehouse in 1982. (5) (8)
1.2.3.2 On-Site Pesticide Burial, 1966
Potentially, the most important historical activity at the
site, from an environmental standpoint was the alleged burial in
1966 of DDT, TDE, and possibly liquid chlordane. Approximately
10,000 pounds of these compounds were allegedly buried in two (2)
adjacent trenches approximately 10-feet deep (4) (5). Figure 1-6
shows the area investigated by EPA in 1989 in an attempt to
locate these trenches. The material was supposedly a mixture of
powders and liquids in a variety of packaging, including paper
bags, glass jars and other types of typical consumer packaging.
After burial was completed, the trenches were covered with six
feet of on-site soils and a reinforced 8-inch thick concrete slab
was poured over the area. This was followed
the upper portion of the current warehouse.
by construction of
According to a past
FCXS employee, the possibility exists that the trenches were
obliterated soon after burial, during extensive construction
related grading. During this time, other packages were taken to
the old Statesville landfill. (4) (5) (6) (8)
1.2.3.3 Additional On-Site Burial
During a site reconnaissance on February 12, 1991, a past
employee of the construction company responsible for much of the
historical site demolition and construction was interviewed. He
indicated that he and other employees were instructed to place
various bagged and bottled pesticides in a hole located in the
current vicinity of the northeast corner of the lower portion of
the warehouse. The hole was apparently located within approxi-
mately 35 feet of the railroad tracks. Possible locations could
range from the inside corner of the lower section of the ware-
1-10
·---- - - --- - - - --l!!l!!I 1!!11111 i==i llliiil liilll
CARNATION
MILK
COMPANY
8
APPROXIMATE
OCA TION, PESTICIDE
MIXING PIT
RESIDENTIAL
AREA
BURLINGTON
INDUSTRIES
APPROXIMATE LOCATION, .>c
FEED MIXING PIT /
APPROXIMATE SCALE
FIGURE 1-6
PRESUMED BURIED TRENCH LOCATIONS
FCX-STATESVILLE
STATESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA
125 O 62.5 ~-::
( IN FEET )
1 inch -125 ft.
KEI
m -STORM CRA lE
0 -UNDERGROUND
STCRAGE TANK
COVERS
t:D -GASOLINE PUMPS
~EPA
I
I
D
D
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
house to a location beneath the large concrete slab east of the
building. This area is shown in Figure 1-6. An additional
reconnaissance was conducted in April 1991. At that time,
interviews with FCXS employees indicated that an additional pit,
possibly a product mixing pit, was originally located within the
horse shoe-shaped building (see Figure 1-4). The approximate
location beneath the current warehouse floor is shown in Figure
1-6 and coincides with an elevator-type structure visible in the
historical photographs.
1. 2. 4 Licensed EPA Establishment
The facility was EPA-licensed to manufacture or repackage
pesticides including, at various times, DDT, TDE, Lindane,
Chlordane, Malathion, Aldrin, Heptachlor, and a tobacco spray,
probably MA-30. Notable spillage is reported to have occurred at
transfer areas, the locations of which are not known. (5)
1. 2. 5 NPL Listing
The FCXS site was evaluated using the EPA Hazard Ranking
System and proposed for inclusion on the National Priorities List
(NPL) on June 24, 1988. The site scored 37.93, based solely on
the ground water pathway. The site was placed on the NPL on
February 21, 1990. (9)
1.2.6 Human Population Survey
The 1980 Census Data indicates that approximately 26,219
people live within a 4-mile radius of the site. (10)
1. 3 Summary of Past Investigations
The site has no previous enforcement history, however, there
have been several sampling investigations, of varying scope, at
the FCXS Site. These investigations were conducted by the North
Carolina Department of Human Resources (NCDHR), US-EPA, and Fred
1-12
H
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
C. Hart, for Southern States Cooperative, one-time potential
purchasers of the site. The following is a summary of the
investigations. Designations for wells sampled for these inves-
tigations are not necessarily consistent from one investigation
to another. Data may be compared using well locations as shown
in the figures, however.
1.3.1. Fred C. Hart Associates. Inc .• February 1986 (4)
During February 1986, Fred C. Hart conducted a pre-purchase
environmental evaluation of the site for Southern States
Cooperative, Inc. Four ground water samples were collected from
wells installed as a part of the evaluation, and five composite
soil samples were collected from locations around the site. All
samples were analyzed for priority pollutant pesticides. The
ground water samples were also analyzed for priority pollutant
volatile organic compounds. Sample locations and analytical
summaries for these samples are shown in Figures 1-7 and 1-8.
Analyses of composite surficial soil samples (unknown
interval) detected nine (9) pesticides, of which chlordane and
4,4-DDT were found at the highest concentrations, 8,000 ug/kg and
2,600 ug/kg, respectively. Pesticides and volatile organic
compounds were detected in the ground water samples. Gamma-BHC
was the prominent pesticide found in three of the wells,
including the upgradient well. Other isomers of BHC, as well as
a possible metabolite of endrin ketone, were also detected.
Trichlorofluoromethane and tetrachloroethylene were the volatile
organic compounds detected at the highest concentrations. Well
MW-3 was the well most contaminated with pesticides; well MW-2
was the well most contaminated with volatile organic compounds.
The ground water data may be somewhat suspect, as the wells
were installed with little regard for quality control and quality
assurance. The wells were constructed with friction-fitted PVC,
taped together with duct tape, and the drilling equipment was not'.
adequately cleaned between wells.
1-13
----- - - --- -
PHtleldet ,'Jpho Bl-IC -0.
Gamma BHC -
BURLINGTON
INDUSTRIES
Peetlcldn:
CARNATION
MILK
COMPANY
'4.-4--DOE -1J
Dleldrln -2. 7
4,4'-000 -20
4,4'-00T -28
O,lordone -240
8
Pcr.rllcldea:
RESIDENTIAL
Alpha BHC -J4
Beto BHC -5.6
Gamma BHC -58
Delta BHC - 1 J
Endrln Keton• -J
AREA Pesticides: -4,4'-DDE -420
Dleldrin -140
-4,4'-DDD -630
4,4°-0DT -150
Chlordane -8000 Pntlcldn: 4,4'-0DE -53
4,4'-DOD -31
4,4'-DDT -96
Chlordane -413
FIGURE 1-7
ANALYTICAL RESULTS SUMMARY
PESTICIDE COMPOUNDS
FRED C. HART STUDY, FEBRUARY 1986
FCX-STATESVILLE
STATESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA
APPROXIMATE SCALE
12>
~ 0
w rm.I -( IN FEET )
1 Inch • 125 fl
62.!S
'
120
I
- - --
Will!!)_
e -SOIL
• -WAlt:R
l!!l!!I
AU. CONC. ug/kg (SOIL): ug/1 (WATIB)
NOTE: ALL SOIL CONCENTRATIONS
ARE COMPOSITE OF"
APPRO)JMATE LOCATIONS SHOWN
P•tlcld•: Alpha BHC -g
Beto BHC -29
4,4'-00E -2::io
Oleldrln -460
4,4'-000 -290
4,4'-00T -2600
Endrfn -4G
Methox)'Chlor -670
.....
/tf
$
(/J
>< 3 0 it
PMtk:kles: 4,4'-00£ -40
4,4'-000 -55
4,4'-DDT -100
Chlordone -750
5JEPA
-- --
Volatles: Trlchloronuoromethane -45
CO'"bontetrochlorlde -65
Trlehlon>eth)'len• -15
Benzene -15
Toluene -15
CARNATION
MILK
COMPANY
-
RESIDENTIAL
AREA
--
Yolotnos: 1,1-0lchloroothone -55
1,1,1-Trlchtoroethone -35
Tetn:ichlor08lh)4ene -95
Volatle.:
- - - -
BURLINGTON
INDUSTRIES
1, 1-Dlchloroelhene -15
1,1-Dlchloroethone -12
Trona-1,2-0lchloroethane -15
1,1.1-Trlc:hlotoethone -15
Trlchloroeth)'lene -25
Tetrochloroelh)f.r1• -41
FIGURE 1-8
ANALYTICAL RESULTS SUMMARY
VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
FRED C. HART STUDY, FEBRUARY 1986
FCX-STA TESVILLE
STATESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA
APPROXIMATE SCALE
( IN FEET )
Inch -125 ft.
62.S : 12' :
- ---l!!!!!I ml!! ==
= @J -WATER
AU. CONC. ug/1 (WATER)
~EPA
u
D
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1. 3. 2 NCDHR, May 1986 (5) (8)
The NCDHR conducted a Site Inspection in May 1986. The on-
site monitoring wells and a deep, water supply well west of the
site on Carnation Milk Company property were sampled, as well as
six soil sample locations. Figure 1-9 contains an organic
compound analytical summary, with sample locations, for this
investigation.
Most of the soil sample locations were in the same areas as
those sampled by Fred C. Hart in February 1986. One sample was
collected south of West Front Street in the yard of a residence.
Lindane was once again identified in a sample from well MW-3.
Fluorocarbons were identified in well MW-4, the upgradient well,
and chlorinated solvents were identified in well MW-2 and the
deep well on Carnation property, east and west of the warehouse,
respectively. Caprolactum, a component of nylon manufacturing,
was detect~d in all of the on-site monitoring well samples.
The soil sampling data revealed that, in addition to
chlordane, DDT and dieldrin were also found at several locations
in the vicinity of the warehouse. These compounds were also
detected in the soil sample from the yard of the residence across
West Front Street from the warehouse.
Ground water and soil samples were also analyzed for
drinking water metals. Barium, chromium and mercury were
detected in one or more of the monitoring wells, however, none of
the occurrences were over the MCL for the analytes.
1.3.3 EPA (Weston•SPER) Emergency Response, •January
1989 (6)
In January 1989, Weston•SPER, Atlanta, Georgia, conducted an
emergency response sampling investigation for EPA at the FCXS
1-16
-- - --
RESIDENTIAL
AREA
FIGURE 1-9
ANALYTICAL RESULTS SUMMARY
SITE INSPECTION, MAY 1986
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT
OF HUMAN RESOURCES
' FCX-STATESVILLE
STATESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA
- - -
SurfaNC.0.--~-;J17,500 Tllhl PMA'■ -2U4 ~ -1100 ~,ICU -510 DDT -590
- - -
BURLINGTON
INDUSTRIES
APPROXIMATE SCALE
12.5 0 62.5 120 ·1-c-~...J -: I
( IN FEET )
1 Inch • 125 ft.
-l!!!!l!!I 1!11!!!!!1 == liiiiiiil lillii1 iiiil
= •-SOIL (t-WATER
AU. CONC. ugjkg (SOIL);
ug/1 (WA~)
NOTE: AU. SOIL CONCE:NTRATIONS
ARE COMPOSITE Of
APPROXIMATE LOCATIONS SHOYIW
~EPA
-
I
I
I
g
n
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
site to determine the nature of pesticide contamination at
locations previously sampled by Fred c. Hart and the NCDHR and to
attempt to locate the two on-site burial trenches allegedly used
to dispose of pesticides in 1969. No pesticides were detected in
any of the samples collected outside of the warehouse building.
The detection limits for these samples, however, were somewhat
higher than those for the previous studies. Further, no evidence
of the alleged burial was observed in any of the approximately 30
borings completed through the floor of the upper warehouse
building. Subsequent conversations with a past FCXS employee
indicates that the borings may have been located too far to the
east to intercept the trenches.
1.3.4 EPA (Weston•SPER) Emergency Response, August 1989
( 11)
Four (4) ground water monitoring wells were installed at two
locations at the Site in August 1989. At each location, two (2)
wells were installed as a shallow (45-feet depth) and deep (125-
feet depth) cluster. These wells, as well as the four (4) Fred
C. Hart wells were sampled for a variety of volatile organic
compounds and pesticides. Figure 1-10 shows the locations of
these samples and the analytical summary for the compounds
detected in the samples.
The most significant contamination identified was a mixture
of various purgeable halogenated hydrocarbons (halocarbons).
This contamination was observed at the greatest concentrations· in
well MW-5D, a deep well located near the center of the Site near
West Front Street, and well MW-1, a shallow well located in the
parking lot against the south face of the warehouse. All wells
showed some degree of halocarbon contamination, with tetra-
chloroethylene being the compound identified at the highest
concentrations in most samples. Pesticides, primarily BHC
isomers were detected in all of the wells, except for wells MW-6S
and MW-6D.
1-18
- - - - - - - -- --
~ -Q.01 l IIM....ete -O.OI0
Cllrto,l~-4.J a-,""""'"' -O.t ~.:i.t::11~"::"~o:,3.1
BURLINGTON
INDUSTRIES
~-,-----
CARNATION
MILK
COMPANY '<
I
'<
I
0 IJ:!:s,.
Mpt,o-llHC -O.tn
e.t.-afC-0.1107
o .. na-OHC --0.10&
~ --0.771
OnenTetr~--0.1
Oolor'ofwm-o.t
1,1-~--7.0
1,2-0~ .... 0.1 1,t-~-1&.I _,._a-,_... ... J.O
T~-IO.O 1,1,1• Tltd~GO It GO .... J.t
n,w,lo. ti -2.0
,,..,?. MW-J o,,,,. O o
S MW-
~
" Npflct--(H:-0.481 hl-L!IHC-0.-o.tt.-aHC -11.1• O...--fltC-O.H4 '-tochlcw" [poiildl .... 0.141
RESIDENTIAL ...,_IIHC -0.014 e.t-eHC --0-382 0---eHC-0,.(14.J
ti,-..,,_,.,. --o.zn
~+ AREA
C.....T~-0.1
__ ..,
1,1-~--,a., 1,.2~ .... 0.7 1.1-~-•2.1 ....,,,._ ~ --21.a
T.tn.ah~ .... la) l,1.1--llk:l ... wlllAw -t;..O T~t-.... 11.2
AfCih,l>--fltC .... 0.029
a.to-&C --0.2'.l
Ocnwr,a,--IIHC -0.011
Oolorofll,rm-0.1 1.1~-llLI 1,1-DkH_,_,. -1111.I ..... ,... CNorldlt --.u 1.e,oe1~owlha.a -51.t 1,1,1-~--11.1 T~---1.4 T1lc:hlo.o .. 0,oc a -1.0 FIGURE 1-10
ANALYTICAL RESULTS SUMMARY
WESTON SPER STUDY
AUGUST, 1989
FCX-STATESVILLE
STATESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA
APPROXIMATE SCALE
12S a 62.5 hw ---! :
( IN FEET)
1 Inch -125 ft.
120
:
111!!1 1!!119
o,w-.,, -O.CII ,.,-Dlctl-•--14.1 _,,,_,•~ --1.l
Tebod•w II .... :J7.l 1.1.I-Trld',lar...,-..-2.1 fHcN---1.1
1111111
'<
I
'<
111111 liillil
!SEY
@ -MONITOR WELL
ALL CONCENTRATIONS
IN ug/1 (WATER)
&EPA
lillil
I
I
I
D
R
\
1.3.5 EPA (O.H. Materials) Emergency Response, January
1990 (12)
During the week of January 8, 1990, O:H· Materials sampled
all eight of the on-site monitoring wells for the Emergency
Response and Removal Branch, EPA, Atlanta. The results of this
sampling are summarized and shown on Figure 1-11. The results
indicate the presence of pesticides in all wells, except for the
cluster of wells in the northeast corner of the site. Other I important observations are the presence of trichlorofluoromethane
in the well located near the northwest corner of the Site and the
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
presence of significant concentrations of tetrachloroethene, 1,1-
dichloroethene, and 1,1-dichloroethane in many of the wells
located in the vicinity of the southeast corner of the warehouse,
as well as the cluster of wells in the northeast corner of the
Site.
1.3.6 NUS Screening Site Inspection. Burlington Indus-
tries. 1990 (13)
During the week of August 20, 1990, NUS Corporation
conducted a screening site inspection at the Burlington
Industries facility located immediately north of the FCXS site.
During this inspection, two ground water samples were collected
from wells MW-GS and MW-GD, located near the northeast corner of
the FCXS site. The location and analytical data for each well is
shown on Figure 1-12. Most notable in these samples is the I presence of toluene and dichloroethene in the deep well, MW-GD.
I
I
I
I
I 1-20
- - -
CARNATION
MILK
COMPANY
8
-
" I
" I
" I
"
-
I=~=~~, _-IIHC-1.09 .
FIGURE 1-11
,ANALYTICAL RESULTS SUMMARY
/ ~-H. MATERIALS STUDY
/ JANUARY, 1990
/ FCX-STATESVILLE
'V~LE, NORTH CAROLINA
~
- - -
l,1•01d -7.71 1,1-Dlcl -1!,..0 ...,
T•buol ) -$2.& 1,1,1-T~ -&.27 T11dJo: Ut -2. ... a,.....,_ -1.11 _....,,.. BMC -O.&
-l!a!!I la!!
BURLINGTON
INDUSTRIES
c-t>onT~-M.11
1,1--DI~ --· 1.2.~ -2.44
~.!"';;;;:c: --,..~.a
T~-.31111 1.1.1-rrtct,~ -13.7 Tlolilo U)lc. 1"
,.,-o1~--as.• ◊
._____,--, ...
'.+
1!11!!!1
'-+ ' .+
--( IN FEET )
APPROXIMATE SCALE ◊
125 O 62.5 125 ◊ 1""'1-....J l l
1 Inch ... 125 ft.
-
' .;:
'4W-
lliiil
l.EGEHD.,
@ -MONITORING WELL LOCATION
.A.LL CONC. uo/l (WATER)
1,1-~-2.7
• ---i'--iHt------~ ·=·--J:-2 TobocUoc Uo,1 • -:,,:z .. 1,1.2-r~~ -t.78 rno~,,,.._.-,_,..
5JEPA
iiiil
- - -
CARNATION
MILK
COMPANY
8
-
" I
" I
" I
"
------11!1!!!!!1
BURLINGTON
INDUSTRIES
AREA RESIDENTIAL
FIGURE 1-12
ANALYTICAL RESULTS SUMMARY
ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
NUS SCREENING SITE INSPECTION, 1990
BURLINGTON INDUSTRIES
STATESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA
APPROXIMATE SCALE
125 0 62.5 ~-....I -:
( IN FEET )
1 Inch = 125 ft.
125
:
l!!!!l!l!!!I 1!!11!1
,.__
/tf
$
//)
% ,3
0
if
liiiilil liiiiil . iliil
=.
@ -WATER
J -ES1H.4AT[D COOC.
N -PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE
FOR COMPOUND
ALL CONC. ug/kg (SOIL);
ug/1 (WATER)
Vol IU11s: Ch101'"oform -0.7J
[J( ocloble5: Amino He11onolc Add -200JN
Butyl dien ebis[ ( dim 11th)'leth )'I)
meth)4J)henol -300JN
Octonethioic 1'cld, H1111)'1ellter -20J
11 Unidentified Compound■ -JOOJ
Vol ties: Dlch!Of'"oethene -JJ
O,lcroform -2J
Toluene -62
Ex roctobles: Hydroxyneth)'leth)4phenolethonone -10...N
6 Unidentified Compounds -9D00J
I
I
I
D
D
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.I
I
2.0 SAMPLING LOCATIONS AND RATIONALE
2 • 1 . sampling Areas
The primary area of investigation consisted of the main site
area, as well as portions of the Carnation and Burlington
properties, the lot east of Phoenix Street, and the residences
and businesses south of West Front Street. In addition to
extensive sampling conducted in this area, surface water and
sediment sampling was also conducted in prominent surface water
features located off-site.
Several additional tasks were completed in order to provide
the data and information needed to make decisions regarding the
current state of the site and future remediation needs. Among
these were a topographic mapping project and an exploratory
program developed to locate the alleged buried pits/trenches,
located beneath the warehouse.
The rationale and protocols developed for the remedial
investigation sampling program are discussed in the following
sections. Included are sample location maps which indicate the
locations of all samples collected, by media, for this
investigation. Tables 2-1, 2-2, and 2-3 are sample location and
description tables for soil, surface water and sediment, and
ground water samples, respectively, collected for the
investigation.
2.1.1. Soil
Both surface and subsurface soil samples were collected at
various locations on-and off-site during the study. For the
purposes of soil sampling, the site was divided into three (3)
areas, Areas 1, 2 and 3. All soil samples were analyzed for all
TCL/TAL,compounds. The sampling locations and depths for Areas
2-1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
STATION.ID ----------FS-100-SLA
FS-101-SL
FS-101-SLB
FS-101-SLC
FS-102-SLA
FS-107-SLA
FS-108-SLA
FS-109-SLA
FS-110-SLA
FS-111-SLA
FS-112-SLA
FS-113-SLA
FS-114-SLA
FS-115-SLA
TABLE 2-1
SOIL SAMPLE LOCATIONS AND DESCRIPTIONS
FCX-STATESVILLE REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION
STATESVILLE, IREDELL COUNTY, NC
DATE/
TIME SAMPLE TYPE DESCRIPTION -----------------------------------------------------07-31-91 Soil Location 100, 0-12 inches BLS; 0845 Grab red clay
07-31-91 Soil Location 101, 0-12 inches BLS; 0830 Grab red clay
07-31-91 Soil Location 101, 24-30 inches BLS; 0835 Grab red clay
07-31-91 Soil Location 101, 48-54 inches BLS; 0915 Grab red clay
07-31-91 Soil Location 102, 0-12 inches BLS; 0900 Grab red clay
06-04-91 Soil Location 107, 0-6 inches BLS; 1355 Grab brown soil/red clay
06-04-91 Soil Location 108, 0-6 inches· BLS; 1410 Grab red clay
06-04-91 Soil Location 109, 0-6 inches BLS;
1420 Grab brown soil/red clay
06-04-91 Soil Location 110, 0-6 inches BLS; 1435 Grab red/brown soil/red clay
06-04-91 Soil ·Location 111, 2-8 inches BLS; 1550 Grab reddish brown clayey sand
06-04-91 Soil Location 112, 2-8 inches BLS; 1525 Grab Reddish brown clayey sand'
06-04-91 Soil Location 113, 2-8 inches BLS;
1540 Grab reddish brown clayey sand
06-04-91 Soil Location 114, 2-8 inches BLS; 1500 Grab reddish brown clayey sand
06-04-91 Soil Location 115, 0-6 inches BLS; 1525 Grab red/brown soil
(Continued)
2-2
H
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
\
TABLE 2-1 (Cont.)
SOIL SAMPLE LOCATIONS AND DESCRIPTIONS
FCX-STATESVILLE REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION
STATESVILLE, IREDELL COUNTY, NC
DATE/
STATION ID TIME ------------------
FS-116-SLA 06-04-91
1535
FS-117-SLA 06-04-91
1550
FS-118-SLA 06-04-91
1600
FS-119-SLA 06-04-91
1610
FS-120-SLA 06-04-91
1710
FS-121-SLA 06-04-91
1720
FS-122-SLA 06-04-91
1730
FS-123-SLA 06-04-91
164 5
FS-124-SLA 06-04-91
1700
FS-125-SLA 06-04-91
1705
FS-126-SLA 06-04.,-91
1715
FS-127-SLA 06-06-91
1540
FS-127-SLB 06-06-91
154 5
FS-127-SLC 06-06-91
1555
SAMPLE TYPE ---------------
Soil
Grab
Soil
Grab
Soil
Grab
Soil
Grab
Soil
Grab
Soil
Grab
Soil
Grab
Soil
Grab
Soil
Grab
Soil
Grab
Soil
Grab
Soil
Grab
Soil
Grab
Soil
Grab
DESCRIPTION ----------------------------Location 116, 0-6 inches BLS;
red clay
Location 117, 0-6 inches BLS;
red clay
Location 118, 0-6 inches BLS; brown soil w/trash and fill
Location 119, 0-6 inches BLS;
red clay
Location 120, 0-6 inches BLS;
red clay
Location 121, 0-6 inches BLS;
red clay
Location 122, 0-6 inches BLS;
gray sand and gravel/red clay
Location 123, 0-6 inches BLS;
light brown clayey sand
Location 124, 0-8 inches BLS;
brown clayey sand
Location 125, 0-6 inches BLS;
light brown clayey sand, Dry
Location 126, 0-6 inches BLS;
light brown sl. clayey sand
Location 127, 0-6 inches BLS;
brown soil. over red clay
Location 127, 24-36 ins. BLS;
red clay
Location 127, 48-60 inches BLS;
red clay
(Continued)·
2-3
I
D
D
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
STATION.ID ----------FS-131-SLA
FS-132-SLA
FS-133-SLA
FS-134-SLA
FS-200-SLA
FS-200-SLB
FS-201-SLA
FS-201-SLB
FS-202-SLA
FS-202-SLB
FS-203-SLA
FS-203-SLB
FS-204-SLA
FS-204-SLB
TABLE 2-1 (Cont.)
SOIL SAMPLE LOCATIONS AND DESCRIPTIONS
FCX-STATESVILLE REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION
STATESVILLE, IREDELL COUNTY, NC
DATE/
TIME --------
06-04-91
1425
06-04-91
1540
06-04-91
1725
06-04-91
1710
06-06-91
1420
06-06-91
1425
06-06-91
1405
06-06-91
1410
06-06-91
1350
06-06-91
1355
06-06-91
1145
06-06-91
1155
06-06-91
1100
06-06-91
1110
SAMPLE TYPE DESCRIPTION -------------------------------------------Soil
Grab
Soil
Grab
Soil
Grab
Soil
Grab
Soil
Grab
Soil
Grab
Soil
Grab
Soil
Grab
Soil
Grab
Soil
Grab
Soil
Grab
Soil
Grab
Soil
Grab
Soil
Grab
Duplicate of FS-109-SLA
Duplicate of FS-116-SLA
Duplicate of FS-121-SLA
Duplicate of FS-124-SLA
Location 200, 0-6 inches ELS;
red brown sandy clay
Location 200, 24-36 inches ELS;
red brown sandy clay
Location 201, 0-6 inches ELS;
red sandy clay
Location 201, 24-36 inches ELS;
red brown sandy clay w/orange
Location 202, 0-6 inches ELS;
yellow brown sandy clay w/orang
Location 202, 24-36 inches ELS;
yellow-brown sandy clay
Location
red clay
Location
red clay
Location
sandy red
Location
sandy
(Continued)
2-4
red
203, 0-6 inches ELS;
w/sand; some gravel
203, 24-36 inches ELS;
w/yellowish sand
204, 0-6 inches ELS;
clay
204, 24-36 inches ELS;
clay
R
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
TABLE 2-1 (Cont.)
SOIL SAMPLE LOCATIONS AND DESCRIPTIONS
FCX-STATESVILLE REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION
STATESVILLE, IREDELL COUNTY, NC
DATE/
STATION ID TIME
FS-204-SLC 06-06-91
1120
FS-205-SLA 06-06-91
0900
FS-205-SLB 06-06-91
0915
FS-206-SLA 06-06-91
0800
FS-206-SLB 06-06-91
1045
FS-208-SLA 06-05-91
1710
FS-208-SLB 06-05-91
1720
FS-208-SLC 06-05-91
1730
FS-209-SLA 06-11-91
0805
SAMPLE TYPE
Soil
Grab
Soil
Grab
Soil
Grab
Soil
Grab
Soil
Grab
Soil
Grab
Soil
Grab
Soil
Grab
Soil
Grab
FS-209-SLB 06-11-91 Soil
0850 Grab
FS-210-SLA 06-11-91
1000
FS-210-SLB 06-11-91
1020
FS-210-SLC 06-11-91
1210
Soil
Grab
Soil
Composite
Soil
Grab
DESCRIPTION ----------------------------Location 204, 48-60 inches BLS;
sandy red clay
Location 205, 0-6 inches BLS;
red clay
Location 205, 24-36 inches BLS;
red clay
Location 206, 0-6 inches BLS;
gray sand w/gravel
Location 206, 24-36 inches BLS;
sandy red clay
Location 208, 0-6 inches BLS;
gray sand and red clay
Location 208, 24-36 inches BLS;
red clay
Location 208. 48-60 inches BLS;
red clay
Location 209, 0-8 inches BLS;
sands and gravel w/red clay
Location 209, 12-48 inches BLS;
mottled red, tan, gray and
yellow silty clay
Location 210, 0-8 inches BLS;
light tan sand with red clay
and gravel
Location 210, 12-54 inches BLS;
organic matter mixed with sands
and clay
Location 210, 48-84 inches BLS;
red clay and yellow sandy silts
(Continued)
2-5
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
TABLE 2-1 (Cont.)
SOIL SAMPLE LOCATIONS AND DESCRIPTIONS
FCX-STATESVILLE REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION
STATESVILLE, IREDELL COUNTY, NC
DATE/
STATION ID TIME SAMPLE TYPE DESCRIPTION
FS-210-SLD 06-11-91 Soil
1250 Grab
FS-211-SLA 06-05-91 Soil
0730 Grab
FS-211-SLB 06-05-91 Soil
0745 Grab
FS-212-SLA 06-11-91 Soil
0840 Grab
FS-212-SLB 06-11-91 Soil
0900 Grab
FS-212-SLC 06-11-91 Soil
0925 Grab
FS-212-SLD 06-11-91 Soil
1000 Grab
FS-212-SLE 06-11-91 Soil
1030 Grab
FS-213-SLA 06-11-91 Soil
1445 Grab
FS-213-SLB 06-11-91 Soil
1450 Grab
FS-214-SLA 06-11-91 Soil
1205 Grab
FS-214-SLB 06-11-91 Soil
1305 Grab
Location 210, 72-108 ins. BLS;
mixed red clay and yellow sandy
silts
Location 211, 0-6 inches BLS;
brown soil
Location 211, 24-36 inches BLS;
red clay
Location 212, 4-24 inches BLS;
red clay
Location 212, 5-7 feet BLS;
red and white clay-felspar
Location 212, 10-12 feet BLS;
mottled white-tan-red sandy
silt
Location 212, 15-17 feet BLS;
tan to brown saprolite
Location 212, 20-22 feet BLS;
saprolite, then felspar at
21.5'-22'.
Location 213, 0-6 inches BLS;
tan sand mixed with red clay
and gravel
Location 213, 24-36 inches BLS;
gray, red, yellow & black clays
w/gravel
Location 214, 0-6 inches BLS;
hard packed sand, red clay and
gravel
Location 214, 24-36 inches BLS;
dry red silty clay w/fine mica
(Continued)
2-6
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
\
TABLE 2-1 (Cont.)
SOIL SAMPLE LOCATIONS AND DESCRIPTIONS
FCX-STATESVILLE REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION
STATESVILLE, IREDELL COUNTY, NC
DATE/
STATION ID TIME
FS-214-SLC 06-11-91
1320
FS-215-SLA 06-10-91
1420
FS-215-SLB 06-10-91
14 35
FS-215-SLC 06-10-91
14 50
FS-216-SLA 06-11-91
1500
FS-216-SLB 06-11-91
1520
FS-216-SLC 06-11-91
1530
FS-217-SLA 06-11-91
1345
FS-217-SLB 06-11-91
1400
FS-218-SLA 06-10-91
1415
FS-218-SLB 06-10-91
1400
FS-219-SLA 06-19-91
1050
FS-219-SLB 06-19-91
1105
SAMPLE TYPE
Soil
Grab
Soil
Grab
Soil
Grab
Soil
Grab
Soil
Grab
Soil
Grab
Soil
Grab
Soil
Grab
Soil
Grab
Soil
Grab
Soil
Grab
Soil
.Grab
Soil
Grab
DESCRIPTION ----------------------------Location 214, 48-60 inches BLS;
dry golden red silty clay
w/mica
Location 215, 0-8 ins. BLS;
gray sandy gravel and red clay
Location 215, 24-36 inches BLS'
red clay
Location 215, 48-60 inches BLS;
red clay/lt. colored sandy clay
Location 216, 0-6 inches BLS;
gray sand w/gravel
Location 216, 24-36 inches BLS;
red clay mixed with gravel
Location 216, 48-60 inches BLS;
tan sands mixed with red clay
Location 217, 0-6 inches BLS;
tan sand mixed w/red clay and
gravel
Location 217, 24-36 inches BLS;
red clay with yellow silt
Location 218, 0-8 inches BLS;
red clay
Location 218, 24-36 inches BLS;
reddish tan clay
Location 219, 0-6 ins. below
slab; red clay; minor trash
(wood, etc.)
Location 219, 24-30 ins. below
slab; red clay and gravel
(Continued)
2-7
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
TABLE 2-1 (Cont.)
SOIL SAMPLE LOCATIONS AND DESCRIPTIONS
FCX-STATESVILLE REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION
STATESVILLE, IREDELL COUNTY, NC
DATE/
STATION ID TIME
FS-220-SLA 06-19-91
0900
FS-220-SLB 06-19-91
0915
FS-221-SLA 06-11-91
1705
SAMPLE TYPE
Soil
Grab
Soil
Grab
Soil
Grab
FS-221-SLB 06-11-91 Soil
1720 Grab
FS-222-SLA 06-05-91
0740
FS-22.2-SLB 06-05-91
07 50
FS-222-SLC 06-05-91
0805
FS-222-SLD 06-05-91
0810
FS-223-SLA 06-05-91
1350
FS-223-SLB 06-05-91
1400
FS-224-SLA 06-05-91
1530
FS-224-SLB 06-05-91
1545
FS-224-SLC 06-05-91
1555
Soil
Grab
Soil
Grab
Soil
Grab
Soil
Grab
Soil
Grab
Soil
Grab
Soil
Grab
Soil
Grab
Soil
Grab
DESCRIPTION ----------------------------Location 220, 0-6 inches below
slab; brown and red clay,
septic odor, trash
Location 220, 30-36 ins. below
slab; foreign material, septic
odor, wood, nails
Location 221, 0-6 inches below
slab; hard red clay
Location 221, 24-36 ins. below
slab, dry red clay
Location 222, 0-6 inches BLS;
gray w/ gravel
Location 222, 24-36 inches BLS;
slightly sandy red clay
Location 222, 48-60 inches BLS;
brown sand w/ some red clay
Duplicate of FS-222-SLC
Location 223, 0-6 inches BLS;
dark brown sand/gravel and red
clay
Location 223, 24-36 inches BLS;
red clay
Location 224, 0-6 inches BLS;
brown sandy clay w/white clay
Location 224, 24-36 inches BLS;
red tight clay
Location 224, 48-60 inches BLS;
red sandy clay
(Continued)
2-8
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
TABLE 2-1 (Cont.)
SOIL SAMPLE LOCATIONS AND DESCRIPTIONS
FCX-STATESVILLE REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION
STATESVILLE, IREDELL COUNTY, NC
STATION.ID
FS-225-SLA
DATE/
TIME
06-05-91
1525
SAMPLE TYPE
Soil
DESCRIPTION ----------------------------Location 225, 0-6 inches BLS
red clay and gravel
FS-225-SLA 06-19-91
0745
Grab
Soil
Grab
FS-225-SLB 06-05-91 Soil
1535 Grab
FS-225-SLC 06-05-91 Soil
1550 Grab
FS-226-SLA 06-05-91 Soil
1600 Grab
FS-226-SLB 06-05-91 Soil
1635 Grab
FS-226-SLC 06-05-91 Soil
1645 Grab
FS-228-SLA 06-05-91 Soil
0935 Grab
FS-228-SLB 06-05-91 Soil
0945 Grab
FS-229-SLA 06-18-91 Soil
0920 Grab
FS-229-SLB 06-18-91 Soil
0948 Grab
FS-229-SLC 06~18-91 Soil
1010 Grab
FS-229-SLD 06-18-91
1035
Location 225, 0-6 inches BLS;
(Resample); Located 12 inches
from 6/5/91 location
Location 225, 24-36 inches BLS;
red clay
Location 225, 48-60 inches BLS;
red/yellow sandy soil
Location 226, 0-12 inches BLS;
gray soil
Location 226, 24-36 inches BLS;
red clay
Location 226, 48-60 ins. BLS;
sandy red clay
Location 228, 0-6 inches BLS;
black clayey sand
Location 228, 24-36 inches BLS;
red clay w/sand
Location 229, 0-2 feet BLS;
red silty, micaceous clay
Location 229, 5-7 feet BLS;
red clay
Location 229, 10-12 feet BLS;
red purple micaceous clay/-
saprolite
Location 229, 15-17 feet BLS;
saprolite wedthered mangan. and
hornblende.
(Continued)
2-9
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
TABLE 2-1 (Cont.)
SOIL SAMPLE LOCATIONS AND DESCRIPTIONS
FCX-STATESVILLE REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION
STATESVILLE, IREDELL COUNTY, NC
DATE/
STATION ID TIME
FS-229-SLE 06-18-91
1055
SAMPLE TYPE
Soil
DESCRIPTION
Location 229, 20-22 feet BLS;
saprolite; red
FS-230-SLA 06-05-91
0910
FS-230-SLB 06-05-91
0920
FS-231-SLA 06-05-91
1355
FS-231-SLB 06-05-91
1405
FS-232-SLA 06-05-91
1335
FS-232-SLB 06-05-91
1345
FS-233-SLA 06-05-91
1330
FS-233-SLB 06-05-91
134 0
FS-233-SLC 06-05-91
1335
FS-234-SLA 06-05-91
1300
FS-234-SLB 06-05-91
1310
FS-235-SLA 06-05-91
1020
Grab
Soil
Grab
Soil
Grab
Soil
Grab
Soil
Grab
Soil
Grab
Soil
Grab
Soil
Grab
Soil
Grab
Soil
Grab
Soil
Grab
Soil
Grab
Soil
Grab
FS-235-SLB 06-05-91 Soil
1030 Grab
Location 230, 0-6 inches BLS;
dark brown slightly clayey sand
Location 230, 24-36 inches BLS;
red clay
Location 231, 0-6 inches BLS;
dry gray/brown sl. clayey sand
Location 231, 24-36 inches BLS;
red clay
Location 232, 0-6 inches BLS;
dry brown sand
Location 232, 24-36 inches BLS;
red clay
Location 233, 0-6 inches BLS;
dark brown sand
Location 233, 24-36 inches BLS;
red clay
Duplicate of FS-233-SLA
Location 234, 0-6 inches BLS
brown soil and gravel
Location 234, 24-36 inches BLS
brown sandy clay
Location 235, 0-6 inches BLS
red clay, brown soil and gravel
Location 235, 24-36 inches BLS
red clay
(Continued)
2-10
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
TABLE 2-1 (Cont.)
SOIL SAMPLE LOCATIONS AND DESCRIPTIONS
FCX-STATESVILLE REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION
STATESVILLE, IREDELL COUNTY, NC
DATE/
STATION ID TIME
FS-236-SLA 06-05-91
1045
FS-236-SLB 06-05-91
1055
FS-236-SLC 06-05-91
1050
FS-237-SLA 06-05-91
0825
FS-237-SLB 06-05-91
0835
FS-237-SLC 06-05-91
0830
FS-238-SLA 06-05-91
084 5
FS-238-SLB 06-05-91
0855
FS-239-SLA 06-06-91
0950
FS-240-SLA 06-12-91
0930
FS-240-SLB 06-12-91
0955
FS-240-SLC 06-12-91
1020
FS-240-SLD 06-12-91
1040
SAMPLE TYPE
Soil
Grab
Soil
Grab
Soil
Grab
Soil
Grab
Soil
Grab
Soil
Grab
Soil
Grab
Soil
Grab
Soil
Grab
Soil
Grab
Soil
Grab
Soil
Grab
Soil
Grab
DESCRIPTION ----------------------------
Location 236, 0-6 inches BLS
red clay, light tan soil/-
sand/gravel
Location 236, 24-36 inches BLS
red clay
Duplicate of FS-236-SLA
Location 237, 0-6 inches BLS
Light brown soil
Location 237, 24-36 inches BLS
red clay
Duplicate of FS-237-SLA
Location 238, 0-6 incehs BLS
light brown soil and red clay
Location 238, 24-36 inches BLS
red clay
Location 239, 0-6 inches BLS
red clay w/some loose sand
Location 240, 0-2 feet BLS;
(asphalt); red clay
Location 240, 5-7 feet BLS;
(asphalt); Red clay
Location 240, 10-12 feet BLS;
(asphalt); light red clay
Location 240, 15-17 feet BLS;
(asphalt); red tan clay
w/feldspar
(Continued)
2-11
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
\
TABLE 2-1 (Cont.)
SOIL SAMPLE LOCATIONS AND DESCRIPTIONS
FCX-STATESVILLE REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION
STATESVILLE, IREDELL COUNTY, NC
DATE/
STATION ID TIME SAMPLE TYPE DESCRIPTION -------------------------------------------------------------FS-240-SLE 06-12-91 Soil
1110 Grab
FS-250-SLA 09-12-91 Soil
0820 Grab
FS-250-SLA 09-12-91 Soil
0830 Grab
FS-250-SLC 09-12-91 Soil
0835 Grab
FS-250-SLD 09-12-91 Soil
0845 Grab
FS-250-SLE 09-12-91 Soil
0900 Grab
FS-300-SLA 06-17-91 Soil
1700 Composite
FS-300-SLB 06-17-91
1707
FS-300-SLC 06-17-91
1715
FS-301-SLA 06-18-91
1505
FS-301-SLB 06-18-91
1510
Soil
Grab
Soil
Grab
Soil
Grab
Soil
Grab
Location 240, 20-22 feet BLS;
(asphalt); red tan clay
w/feldspar
Location 250, 0 11 -1211 BLS;
gravelly mottled red clay with
dark black layer
Location 250, 24''-30'' BLS; dark
red brown silty clay; loose and
very slightly moist
Location 250, 48"-54" BLS;
red brown silty clay; loose and
very slightly moist
Location 250, 8011 -8611 BLS;
purple to red silty clay; loose
and very slightly moist
Location 250, 158"-164" BLS;
red brown silty clay with some
fine white material
Location 300, 18-24 ins. below
floor; orange red silty clay;
dry; "fill"
Location 300, 30-36 ins. below
floor; dry crumbly red clay
w/purple color
Location 300, 54-60 ins. below
floor; red silty clay; dry;
saprolitic text.
Location 301, 54-60 ins. below
floor; ochre red clay, dry.
Location 301, 76-84 ins. below
Red/purple/ochre clay
(Continued)
2-12
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
TABLE 2-1 (Cont.)
SOIL SAMPLE LOCATIONS AND DESCRIPTIONS
FCX-STATESVILLE REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION
STATESVILLE, IREDELL COUNTY, NC
DATE/
STATION ID
. FS-302-SLA
TIME SAMPLE TYPE DESCRIPTION
06-18-91 Soil
1725 Grab
FS-302-SLB 06-18-91 Soil
1720 Grab
FS-303-SLA 06-17-91 Soil
1725 Grab
FS-303-SLB 06-17-91 Soil
1730 Grab
FS-304-SLA 06-18-91 Soil
1255 Grab
FS-304-SLB 06-18-91 Soil
1258 Grab
FS-305-SLA 06-18-91 Soil
1315 Grab
FS-305-SLB 06-18-91 Soil
1320 Grab
FS-305-SLC 06-18-91 Soil
1325 Grab
FS-306-SLA 06-14-91 Soil
Location 302, 42-48 ins. below
floor; orange red clay
Location 302, 72-78 ins. below
floor; red clay
Location 303, 0-6 inches below
floor; red dry clay
Location 303, 24-30 ins. below
floor; dry red/ochre silty
clay/saprolite
Location 304, 0-6 inches below
floor; dry red crumbly clay
Location 304, 24-30 ins. below
floor; dry orange red crumbly
clay
Location 305, 0-6 inches below
floor; dry red crumbly clay
Location 305, 24-30 ins. below
floor; dry red orange crumbly
clay
Duplicate of FS-305-SLB
0935 Composite
Location 306, 0-42 inches below
floor; VOA from 12-1~ inches;
blocky red clay
FS-306-SLB 06-14-91 Soil
0940 Grab
FS-306-SLC 06-14-91 Soil
0945 Grab
Location 306, 54-60 ins. below
floor; orange red clay;
crumbly; drier
Location 306, 78-84 ins. below
floor; orange red crumbly dry
clay
(Continued)
2-13
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
TABLE 2-1 (Cont.)
SOIL SAMPLE LOCATIONS AND DESCRIPTIONS
FCX-STATESVILLE REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION
STATESVILLE, IREDELL COUNTY, NC
DATE/
STATION ID TIME SAMPLE TYPE ---------------------------------FS-307-SLA 06-18-91 Soil
1650 Composite
FS-308-SLA 06-17-91 Soil
1745 Grab
FS-308-SLB 06-17-91 Soil
1800 Grab
FS-309-SLA 06-14-91 Soil
0915 Grab
FS-309-SLB 06-14-91 Soil
0916 Grab
FS-310-SLA 06-14-91 Soil
0850 Grab
FS-310-SLB 06-14-91 Soil
0850 Grab
FS-311-'SLA 06-13-91 Soil
1625 Grab
FS-311-SLB 06-13-91 Soil
1630 Grab
FS-311-SLC 06-13-91 Soil
164 5 Grab
FS-312-SLA 06-13-91 Soil
1530 Grab
FS-312-SLB 06-13-91 Soil
1535 Grab
FS-313-SLA 06-14-91 Soil
1015 Grab
DESCRIPTION ----------------------------
Location 307, 0-72 inches below
floor; refusal at "footer"?
Location 308, 0-6 inches below
floor; red dry crumbly clay
Location 308, 24-30 ins. below
floor; red dry crumbly clay
Location 309, 0-6 inches below
floor; reddish orange clay, dry
Location 309, 24-36 ins. below
floor; reddish orange clay-dry
Location 310, 0-6inches below
floor; reddish orange clay
mottled
Location 310, 24-30 ins. below
floor; light redish orange clay
Location 311, 0-6 inches below
floor; red, generally struc-
tureless clay, blocky
Location 311, 24-30 ins. below
floor; red structureless clay,
blocky
Duplicate of FS-311-SLB
Location 312, 6-12 inches below
floor; red clay w/gravel; dry
Location 312, 24-30 ins. below
floor; slightly moist, red clay
Location 313, 0-6 inches below
floor; reddish orange clay, dry
(Continued)
2-14
m
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
TABLE 2-1 (Cont.)
SOIL SAMPLE LOCATIONS AND DESCRIPTIONS
FCX-STATESVILLE REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION
STATESVILLE, IREDELL COUNTY, NC
DATE/
STATION.ID TIME
FS-313-SLB 06-14-91
1015
FS-314-SLA 06-14-91
0945
FS-314-SLB 06-14-91
0945
FS-315-SLA 06-13-91
1630
FS-315-SLB 06-13-91
1635
FS-316-SLA 06-13-91
1555
FS-316-SLB 06-13-91
1600
SAMPLE TYPE
Soil
Grab
Soil
Grab
Soil
Grab
Soil
Grab
Soil
Grab
Soil
Grab
Soil
Grab
FS-317-SLA 06-13-91 Soil
1515 Grab
FS-317-SLB 06-13-91· Soil
1520 Grab
FS-318-SLA 06-.13-91 Soil
1120 Grab
FS-318-SLB 06-13-91 Soil
1125 Grab
FS-319-SLA 06-13-91 Soil
1545 Grab
FS-319-SLB 06-13-91 Soil
1550 Grab
DESCRIPTION ----------------------------Location 313, 24-30 ins. below
floor; redish orange clay, dry
Location 314, 0-6 inches below
floor; reddish orange clay, dry
Location 314, 24-30 ins. below
floor; reddish orange clay, dry
Location 315, 0-6 inches below
floor; reddish orange clay
Location 315, 24-30 ins. below
reddish orange clay
Location 316, 0-6 inches below
floor; reddish orange clay
w/sand
Location 316, 24-30 ins. below
floor; reddish orange clay
Location 317, 0-6 inches below
floor; light orange clay
w/conrete gravel
Loction 317, 24-36 inches below
floor; dark reddish orange clay
Location 318, 0-6 inches below
floor; red silty clay
Location 318, 12-18 ins. below
floor; gravelly orange red clay
Location 319, 0-6 inches below
floor; orange sandy clay
Location 319, 12-16 ins. below
floor; yellow orange sandy
clay, auger refusal
(Continued)
2-15
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
\
TABLE 2-1 (Cont.)
SOIL SAMPLE LOCATIONS AND DESCRIPTIONS
FCX-STATESVILLE REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION
STATESVILLE, IREDELL COUNTY, NC
DATE/
STATION ID TIME SAMPLE TYPE DESCRIPTION -------------------------------------------------------------FS-320-SLA 06-12-91 Soil
1350 Grab
FS-320-SLB 06-12-91 Soil
1420 Grab
FS-321-SLA 06-12-91 Soil
Location 320, 36-42 ins. below
floor; red clay; petrol. and
pesticide odor; gravel
Location 320, 96-108 ins. below
floor; uniform dark red clay;
no odor
1315 Composite
Location 321, 1-6 feet below
floor; reddish orange clay
fill; VOA@ 4'-4.5'
FS-321-SLB 06-12-91 Soil
1335 Grab
FS-322-SLA 06-12-91 Soil
1500 Grab
FS-322-SLB 06-12-91 Soil
1510 Grab
FS-323-SLA 06-12-91 Soil
1555 Grab
FS-323-SLB 06-12-91 Soil
1600 Grab
FS-324-SLA 06-12-91 Soil
1705 Grab
FS-324-SLB 06-12-91 Soil
1715 Grab
FS-324-SLC 06-12-91 Soil
1725 Grab
Location 321, 6-7 feet
below floor; oil stained brown
clay mixed with gravel
Location 322, 12-18 inches
below floor; VOA from 18"-24";
mottled red clay
Location 322, 24-36 inches
below floor; oil stained, dark
gravelly, sandy clay
Location 323, 18-24 ins.
below floor; red orange clay
w/gravel
Location 323, 36-48 inches
below floor; reddish orange
clay
Location 324, 12-18 inches
below floor; gravely brown to
red sandy clay
Location 324, 36-48 inches
below floor; red clay
Duplicate of FS-324-SLA
(Continued)
2-16
\I
I
D
I
m
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
TABLE 2~1 (Cont.)
SOIL SAMPLE LOCATIONS AND DESCRIPTIONS
FCX-STATESVILLE REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION
STATESVILLE, IREDELL COUNTY, NC
DATE/
STATION ID TIME SAMPLE TYPE
FS-325-SLA 06-13-91 Soil
1025 Grab
FS-325-SLB 06-13-91 Soil
1030 Grab
FS-325-SLC 06-13-91 Soil
1050 Grab
FS-326-SLA 06-18-91 Soil
1822 Grab
FS-326-SLB 06-18-91 Soil
1825 Grab
FS-326-SLC 06-18-91 Soil
1830 Grab
2-17
DESCRIPTION
Location 325, 0-12 inches below
floor; reddish orange clay
Location 325, 12-18 inches
below floor; brown to redish
orange clay
Location 325, 24-36 inches
below floor; reddish orange
clay/gravel
Location 326, 24-30 inches
below floor; orange red clay
Location 326, 46-52 inches
below floor; red clay
Location 326, 66-72 inches
below floor; red clay
I
I
H
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
TABLE 2-2
SURFACE WATER AND SEDIMENT SAMPLE LOCATIONS AND DESCRIPTIONS
FCX-STATESVILLE REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION
STATESVILLE, IREDELL COUNTY, NC
DATE/
STATION ID TIME SAMPLE TYPE DESCRIPTION -------------------------------------------------------------FS-020-SD
FS-020-SW
FS-400-SD
FS-401-SD
FS-402-SD
FS-403-SD
FS-403-SW
FS-404-SD
FS-404-SW
FS-405-SD
FS-405-SW
FS-406-SD
FS-406-SW
FS-407-SD
09-11-91 Sediment
1040 Grab
09-11-91 Surface Water
1030 Grab
06-04-91 Sediment
1300 Grab
06-04-91 Sediment
1310 Grab
06-04-91 Sediment
1250 Grab
06-04-91 Sediment
1415 Grab
06-04-91 Surface Water
1410 Grab
06-04-91 Sediment
1310 Grab
06-04-91 Surface Water
1300 Grab
06-04-91 Sediment
0850 Grab
06-04-91 Surface Water
0840 Grab
06-04-91 Sediment
0950 Grab
06-04-91 Surface Water
0940 Grab
06-04-91
0955
Sediment
Grab
Head of south tributary to
Third Creek
Head of south tributary to
Third Creek
20 feet east of southwest
corner of building
3 feet north of northeast
corner of concrete pad
45 feet west of culvert
Unnamed tributary at Bristol
Road
Unnamed tributary at Bristol
Road
Davis property
Davis property
Third Creek upstream from
paving company
Third Creek upstream from
paving company
Third Creek downstream from
paving company
Third Creek downstream from
paving company
Western headwaters of stream
north of Burlington Industries
(Continued)
2-18
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
TABLE 2-2 (Continued)
SURFACE WATER AND SEDIMENT SAMPLE LOCATIONS AND DESCRIPTIONS
FCX-STATESVILLE REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION
STATESVILLE, IREDELL COUNTY, NC
DATE/
STATION ID TIME SAMPLE TYPE ---------------------------------
FS-407-SW 06-04-91 Surface Water
0950 Grab
FS-408-SD 06-04-91 Sediment
0925 Grab
FS-408-SW 06-04-91 Surface Water
0920 Grab
FS-409-SD 06-04-91 Sediment
0835 Grab
FS-409-SW 06-04-91 Surface Water
0830 Grab
FS-410-SD 06-04-91 Sediment
1020 Grab
FS-410-SW 06-04-91 Surface Water
1010 Grab
2-19
DESCRIPTION
Western headwaters of stream
north of Burlington Industries
Eastern headwaters of stream
north of Bur_l ington Industries;
behind garden
Eastern headwaters of stream
.north of Burlington Industries;
behind garden
Influent of pond located north
of Burlington Industries
Influent of pond located north
of Burlington Industries
Duplicate of FS-406-SD
Duplicate of FS-406-SW
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
TABLE 2-3
GROUND WATER SAMPLE 'LOCATIONS AND DESCRIPTIONS
FCX-STATESVILLE REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION
STATESVILLE, IREDELL COUNTY, NC
DATE/
STATION ID TIME SAMPLE TYPE DESCRIPTION -------------------------------------------------------------
FS-500-GW 06-04-91 Ground Water Monitoring Well MW-1
1745 Grab
FS-501-GW 06-04-91 Ground Water Monitoring Well MW-5S
1600 Grab
FS-502-GW 06-06-91 Ground Water Monitoring Well MW-5D
1915 Grab
FS-503-GW 06-05-91 Ground Water Monitoring Well MW-2
1205 Grab
FS-504-GW 06-06-91 Ground Water Monitoring Well MW-6D
1245 Grab
FS-505-GW 06-06-91 Ground Water Monitoring Well MW-6S
1245 Grab
FS-520-GW 06-05-91 Ground Water Duplicate of FS-503-GW
1230 Grab
FS-520A-GW 07-30-91 Ground Water Monitoring Well MW-7
1050 Grab
FS-521-GW 07-30-91 Ground Water Monitoring Well MW-8
1435 Grab
FS-522-GW 07-30-91 Ground Water Monitoring Well MW-9
1635 Grab
FS-523-GW 07-30-91 Ground Water Monitoring Well MW-10
1700 Grab
FS-524-GW 07-31-91 Ground Water Carnation Well
1045 Grab
FS-525-GW 07-31-91 Ground Water Johnson Well
FS-526-GW
1150 Grab
07-31-91
1335
Ground Water
Grab
Gaines Well
(Continued)
2-20
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
STATION·ID ----------FS-527-GW
FS-530-GW
FS-531-GW
TABLE 2-3 (Continued)
GROUND WATER SAMPLE LOCATIONS AND DESCRIPTIONS
FCX-STATESVILLE REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION
STATESVILLE, IREDELL COUNTY, NC
DATE/
TIME SAMPLE TYPE DESCRIPTION
\
---------------------------------------------------07-31-91 Ground Water Moose Well 1400 Grab
09-11-91 Ground Water Monitoring Well MW-3 1330 Grab
09-11-91 Ground Water Monitoring Well MW-1 1320 Grab
2-21
I \
I 1, 2 and 3 are shown in Figure 2-1. The location sampled to
provide background data for soils is shown in Figure 2-2.
I
I
I
In Area 1, at locations west, south and east of the site,
and at an off-site background location, a total of thirty two
(32) surface and subsurface soil samples were collected at twenty
one (21) locations. The subsurface samples were collected at
depths of 24 inches and 48 inches below ground surface. Sample
locations within Area 1 are located upslope of or adjacent to I areas associated with historical site activities. Because of the
lack of site-related activity in this area and, subsequently, the
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
low probability of significant contamination, particularly in the
subsurface, the sampling effort in this area concentrated on
surface characterization. These results were evaluated to deter-
mine if further characterization in the subsurface was required.
It was not.
The next area sampled was Area 2. Area 2 consists of all
the remaining area within the area of investigation, excluding
the warehouse. At locations within this area, a total of one
hundred and seven (107) surface and subsurface soil samples were
collected at forty seven (47) locations. Subsurface sampling
intervals at most locations began at 24 and 48 inches. At the
four new monitoring well locations, five (5) samples were
collected at intervals of 0"-24", 60"-84 11 , 120"-144", 180"-204 11 ,
and 240"-264" below ground surface. The sampling depths chosen
for Area 2 were selected to verify the apparent limited vertical
extent of contamination in this area identified during previous
investigations.
The last area in which soil sampling was conducted,
designated as Area 3, was the warehouse. A total of sixty :Go)
samples were collected at twenty seven (27) locations. The
sampling program developed for the warehouse had two goals. One,
to provide site characterization data for the soils beneath the
2-22
-
X
-
x-
\
-
• .J1.l
•
(AJ D"-#'
(I) 24"'-Yf'
SCALE
75 D 17.5
L ,-"..J I ,...__~ I
( IN FUT)
-
" I
- --------BURLINGTON INDUSTRIES
:z.J.l
(A) 0"-4'" . (I) 2••. _ _.,.. _ X
)( -." .
x-
= ~~ ):::' • Zli V,) rr-.-0"4' i:1 »'-•~ • 24"-,.. • m~=== N"-101" i:ffi:-
i:i2'-4' .2Ja mJij .--r • 2<m. v--W(A) 0"-... I~:::
1:i.--~-rEB .,_, •·-D 72"-10.-
2~
• 24"-X -X
WEST FRONT STREET
(A) D"-r • l1Q {A) f/'
LJ
•
• 112
(A) ff'-.-
ll< • (A) ff'-1"
FIGURE 2-1
ll.O •
(A) O"-r
• ~a-.... -
SOIL SAMPLE LOCATIONS AND DEPTHS
FCX-STA TESVILLE REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION
STATESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA
JUNE 1991 TO SEPTEMBER 1991
\ - -- -
•ffi";~ ... l2J
,J1;l_ .. • \ (9) , •• _,..
(C) 4r-llCI"
)(
I • )( JM.-
o. I 'at.-
lll 0 .,,, .. _, ..
.W, .. _.. D
(A) O"-r
~EPA
-
ill •
(A) rt'-t"
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
--
[:\ BACKGROUND/CONTROL t SOIL SAMPLE LOCATION,
\~ FS-127=~~ !~~:~;~.)
.~\ " " .. 1:1 •
' '
' '
1000 0 1000 E3'"--.=:T Lr· -----. E
Scale (Feet)
2000
j
Figure 2-2
Background Soil Sample Location Map FCX-Statesville Remedial Investigation
Statesville, North Carolina
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
\
building, and two, to extend the 1989 effort to locate the
trenches allegedly buried beneath the buildings. In support of
the second goal, the largest number of samples was collected in
the upper section of the warehouse, in the.area where the burial
most likely occurred. Sampling conducted in 1989 in the eastern
portion of the upper section did not detect any evidence of the
presence of trenches beneath the floor of the building, however.
A review of historical photographs indicates that the trenches,
if present, may be located further to the west, relative to the
area that was previously investigated.
Sampling beneath the warehouse floor was less than straight-
forward. An electric coring drill was used to core a hole in the
concrete floor large enough to accept a hand auger bucket. Prior
to coring at each location, precautions were taken to minimize
the introduction of surface contamination into the hole. Each
area was first scrubbed with a push broom and Liquinox® solution.
This solution was then vacuumed into a wet-dry vacuum cleaner.
The area was then rinsed with potable water. This rinse water
was also vacuumed. At all times during coring, the cooling water
pooling around the bit was vacuumed as it collected. Little, if
any, residual cooling water was observed in core holes after
removal of the concrete cylinders. Added protection against
cross-contamination was present at most locations in the form of
intact, heavy polyethylene sheeting, apparently placed on the
compacted fill surface prior to pouring of the floor.
In order to observe vertical changes in the soil profile
beneath the concrete slab prior to sample collection, the soil
removed from each location was placed, in piles representing six-
inch intervals, on a strip of foil placed above a sheet of
plastic. This provided the opportunity to attempt to
differentiate between fill and native material. This was not
always easy. While the surficial material beneath the pad is
important from an exposure standpoint, should the pad be removed,
2-25
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
efforts were made to identify and sample any original land
surfaces that might be present beneath fill layers to determine
if any significant contamination exists which had been covered
with clean fill. Sometimes the distinction was clear; other
times it was subtle. After it was determined that the depth of
augering had penetrated native material, decisions were made, at
each location, regarding sample intervals. While the depths of
sampling were not consistent from one location to the next, the
results provide a clear indication of the contaminants that are
present, as well as their patterns of distribution. These are
discussed in Section 4.1.2.
2.1.2. Surface Water and Sediment
Sediment samples were collected at eleven (11) locations.
Surface water samples were collected at eight (8) of these. The
locations of these samples are shown on Figures 2-3. Sediment
samples FS-400, FS-401 and FS-402 were collected to characterize
sediments in the immediate vicinity of FCXS and Burlington
Industries. All surface water and sediment samples were analyzed
for all TCL/TAL compounds.
The remaining eight (8) locations are combined surface water
and sediment sample locations. stations FS-020, FS-403, FS-404,
FS-405 and FS-406 are located in Third Creek, south of the site,
and in its unnamed tributary. Stations FS-407, FS-408 and FS-409
are located in the prominent drainage feature which originates
just north of the Burlington Industries facility and terminates
in the neighborhood pond further to the north. These locations
were selected to characterize the impact the FCXS site has on
off-site sediment and surface water conditions, allowing
differentiation from other potential sources of contamination.
2-26
-- - - -- --·-
0 125 ------~ Scale, feet
* Sediment sample only at these locationa
Figure 2-3
Surface Water and Sediment Sample Location
FCX-Statesville Remedial Investigation
Statesville, North Carolina
- -- - -- - --
Map
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
2.1.3. Ground Water
Ground water sampling was conducted in two phases for the
remedial investigation. During the initial phase of the
investigation, conducted during the summer of 1991, all of the
previously installed monitoring wells, as well as the four wells
installed in June 1991, were sampled. The locations of these
wells are shown on Figure 2-4. Monitoring wells MW-5D and MW-6D
are both completed in bedrock to depths of 125 feet below land
surface. The remaining monitoring wells are all completed in the
weathered overburden overlying the bedrock. Boring logs and/or
well construction diagrams for these wells are found in Appendix
A.
Ground water samples were also collected from the Carnation
well, west of the site, and from three private wells south of the
site. The Carnation well is approximately 500-feet deep and
completed open-hole throughout the entire bedrock interval. The
three potable wells are all 24-inch diameter bored wells, com-
pleted in the weathered overburden. These wells are shown on
Figure 2-5.
2.1.4. Aquifer Properties
The POP specified that aquifer properties would be
determined during the remedial investigation using both single
well slug test and pump tests utilizing existing fractured
bedrock wells and nearby shallow, saprolite monitoring wells.
This work was not conducted during Phase I of the investigation
but will be conducted during Phase II concurrently with the
installation of additional temporary and permanent monitoring
wells. The results will be included in the Phase II remedial
investigation report to be issued at a later date as a separate
and supporting document to this report.
2-28
- ----
I
"
- - -
I -lr MW-4
I
" I
0;"1c
-
8 0 ~ 0
RESIDENTIAL
AREA
•
MW-SD ~
- - -
BURLINGTON
INDUSTRIES
- -
'' " ~~ ---------__,.--..._.,,
FIGURE 2-4
GROUNDWATER SAMPLING LOCATIONS,
. MONITORING WELLS
' FCX-STATESVILLE
STATESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA
APPROXIMATE SCALE
125 0 62.5 ~-....J -:
( IN FEET )
1 Inch = 125 ft.
125
I
- - ---
ill'.
8 -EPA WEUS INSTALLED FOR THIS STIJDY
.. -F.C. HART STUDY
♦ -CARNATION ~
@ -EPA REMOVAL 'n£LLS
•
~EPA
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1000 0 l fl'lC\ XYJ/J JO()(• f,.T Tl l T . F'--'--=:---:""'1--. :--:--1
Scale (Feet)
Figure 2-5 Carnation and Potable Well Location Map FCX-Statesville Remedial Investigation · Statesville, North Carolina
' ' •S
,. -'1 ' if!
1~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
2.1.5 Contaminant Source Investigation
One of the primary objectives of the remedial investigation
was to attempt to locate the trenches or p~ts that have been
alleged to exist beneath the warehouse floor. This aspect of the
investigation was implemented using hand and powered augering
techniques associated with the soil sampling program for the
warehouse and a separate, non-sampling exploratory augering
effort.
Boreholes ranging in depth from 12 feet to 15 feet below the
floors of the warehouse were augered with a power auger at
selected locations. These locations, shown in Figure 2-6, were
selected, in part, based on interviews with past FCX employees
with purported knowledge of the location of product mixing pits
or alleged disposal trenches. This information was also
evaluated and compared to historical photographs in an effort to
precisely determine the locations of the mixing pits.
Approximately 30 holes were augered beneath the floor of the I warehouse during the emergency response activity in 1989, with no
evidence of buried material found. An additional 36 holes were
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
augered during this investigation (27 power-augered soil borings
and 9 purely exploratory power-augered borings). No evidence of
buried material was observed in any of the borings.
2.2 Sample Identification
Samples collected during the project were assigned a unique
sample number incorporating a site identifier, a sample location
number, and a media identifier. Surface and subsurface soil
samples collected at the same location were identifed using the
same location number and A, B, C, etc., in the last character
position of the soil media identifier to indicate samples
collected at increasing depths, i.e., ''C'' is from a greater depth
2-31
-------------------
8
~EPA
o,,,,,o
0 l!:!:sr
RESIDENTIAL
AREA
■ ■
■
■
■
;:--?o,i,
1' S1;
0 0
I:;,-I;:,
FIGURE 2-6
EXPLORATORY BORING LOCATION MAP
FCX-STA TESV!LLE REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION
STATESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA
BURLINGTON
INDUSTRIES
■
■
125
I
-=--■ -BORING LOCATION
APPROXIMATE SCALE
0
-....J --( IN FEET )
1 inch -125 ft.
62.S
'
125
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
than ''A''· Actual sampling depths varied somewhat and are
identified in both the Sample Location and Description table,
Table 2-1, and in the data summary tables. The following
identification system was used.
FS-XXX-YYY
FS identifies the site as fCX-~tatesville, XXX denotes the
sample location number, and YYY denotes the media.
identified by the following key:
The media are
SL(A, B, C, etc.)
SD
SW
GW
Soil
Sediment
Surface Water
Ground Water
The sample identified as FS-107-SLB, would, therefore, be
the subsurface soil sample collected from the second interval
sampled at location number 107. Samples collected for QA/QC
purposes, except for duplicates, were identified in the same
general format where YYY indicates the type of blank. Duplicates
were given either a different station number, for sediment,
surface water or ground water samples, or, for soils, were
assigned a different depth designation.
2.3 Sample Collection and Handling Procedures
All samples were collected, preserved, handled and
documented in accordance with the Environmental Compliance Branch
Standard Operating Procedures and Quality Assurance Manual,
February 1, 1991 (ECBSOPQAM) (14). Deviations from procedures
contained in this manual were documented in field log books and
are discussed, where pertinent in this report.
2-33
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
2.4 Sample Analysis
All samples were analyzed for extractable organic compounds
(base/neutral and acid extractables), pesticides/PCBs, purgeable
organic compounds, metals, and cyanide. Selected samples col-
lected during Phase II of the ground water investigation were
also analyzed for total organic carbon. The analysis included
all substances on the Target Compound List (TCL) and the Target
Analyte List (TAL).
All analyses were conducted in accordance with the ASBOQCM
(14) or as specified by the existing US-EPA standard procedures
and protocols (Statement of Work) for the contract analytical
laboratory program.
2.5 Quality Assurance
Quality assurance (QA) begins in the planning stage and
continues through sample collection, analyses, reporting and
final review. The methods that were used to insure data quality
for the FCX-Statesville remedial investigation are discussed
below.
2. 5. 1. Organization and Responsibilities
The Field Project Coordinator, Donald Hunter, had overall
responsibility for field QA and was responsible for ensuring that
the prescribed routine quality control (QC) procedures defined in
the work plan were implented and documented.
Laboratory analyses were conducted either by the Analytical
Support Branch (ASB) or through the contract laboratory program
(CLP), with overall responsibility for the ASB laboratory QA
resting with the the Branch Chief. William H. McDaniel, Chief,
Inorganic Section and Tom B. Bennett, Chief, Organic Chemistry
2-34
I
I Section were primarily responsible for ensuring that prescribed
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
routine QC procedures were applied and documented in the ASB
laboratory. Wade Knight, Region IV QA Officer, was primarily
responsible for ensuring that QA/QC procedures were applied to
the samples submitted through the CLP for analysis.
2 . 5 . 2 Sample Collection
As previously indicated, all samples were collected in
accordance with Section 4 of the ECBSOPQAM (14). The quality
assurance and quality control procedures described in this manual
were designed to insure that representative samples are collected
from the various media sampled.
The work p)an prescribed that duplicate samples would be
collected at 10 percent of the sample locations for each matrix
to provide a check for sampling techniques. The final duplicat~
percentages varied for each media. Nine, twelve, six and six
percent duplicates were collected for sediment, surface water,
ground water and soil, respectively. The duplicate analytical
results for these samples are found in the analytical data
summary tables in Chapter 4. These results are located next to
the results for the sample which was duplicated.
In addition, a number of quality control blanks were used to
provide assurance that data generated for the remedial
investigation was of useable quality. Water trip blanks were
prepared for each trip where water samples were collected and
transported to the ASB laboratory. These blanks were prepared
with organic-free water from the field organic-free water system
and were analyzed for extractable organic compounds (including
pesticides/PCBs, herbicides and other specified organic
compounds) and volatile organic compounds. The trip blanks were
handled and stored with the samples collected from the site and
provided a check to determine if samples may have been
2-35
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
contaminated during handling, storage and shipment. Trip blanks
were also utilized for each shipment of soil samples sent to a
CLP laboratory.
Preservative blanks/organic-free water system blanks were
collected.at the beginning of the project and during each week
samples were collected to ensure the integrity of the reagants
used to preserve samples and the continued proper operation of
the organic-free water system. These samples were analyzed for
extractable organic compounds (including pesticides/PCBs,
herbicides and other specified organic compounds), volatile
organic compounds, metals and cyanide. Equipment rinse blanks
were collected from equipment cleaned on-site, using organic-free
water, at least once a week and were analyzed for the same
constituents as the water system samples. The equipment rinse
blanks were collected to insure that the sampling equipment was
properly field cleaned. Pre-cleaned sampling equipment taken
into the field was subject to similar QA/QC procedures. The
samples collected for quality control purposes are described in
Table 2-4. Please note that sampling events conducted in July
and September of 1991 were small-scale investigations and did not
require the cleaning of any field sampling equipment. There are
no equipment rinse blanks associated with these trips. The
analytical results for these samples are summarized in Tables 2-5
and 2-6.
2.5.J Analytical Quality Control and Quality Assurance
All analyses were conducted in accordance with the
Analytical Support Branch Laboratory Operations and Quality
Control Manual (ASBLOQCM) (15) or according to the CLP Statement
of Work. Analytical quality control and quality assurance
depends on careful consideration and attention to, among other
things, chain of custody, instrument calibration procedures,
routine QC checks, data validation and reporting, and the
2-36
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
STATION ID ----------
FS-600-GW
FS-601-GW
FS-602-SLA
FS-603-SLA
FS-604-GW
FS-605-GW
FS~606-QA
FS-607-SLA
FS-608-SLA
FS-608-SLB
FS-609-EB
FS-610-EB
FS-611-SLA
FS-611-SLB
TABLE 2-4
QA/QC SAMPLE DESCRIPTIONS
FCX-STATESVILLE REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION
STATESVILLE, IREDELL COUNTY, NC
DATE/
TIME --------
06-05-91
1545
06-05-91
1530
06-05-91
1200
06-05-91
1300
06-07-91
0825
06-07-91
0845
06-10-91
1710
06-11-91
1745
06-13-91
0735
06-13-91
0745
06-13-91
1325
06-13-91
1350
06-19-91
1000
06-19-91
1010
SAMPLE TYPE ---------------
Water
Grab
Water
Grab
Soil
Grab
Soil
Grab
Water
Grab
Water
Grab
Water
Grab
Soil
Grab
Soil
Grab
Soil
Grab
Rinsate
Grab
Rinsate
Grab
Soil
Grab
Soil
Grab
DESCRIPTION ------------------------------Equipment rinse blank (Pan,
auger bucket, spoon, ans scoop)
Organic-free water system
blank
CLP spike (not tabulated)
CLP blank (not tabulated)
Equipment rinse blank
Trip blank
Organic-free water system
Sand pack sand blank
CLP blanks (not tabulated)
CLP spikes (not tabulated)
Equipment rinse blank
Equipment rinse blank,
6.25 ID auger flight
CLP blank (not tabulated)
CLP spike (not tabulated)
blank
(Continued)
2-37
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
TABLE 2-4 (Continued)
QA/QC SAMPLE DESCRIPTIONS
FCX-STATESVILLE REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION
STATESVILLE, IREDELL COUNTY, NC
DATE/
STATION ID TIME SAMPLE TYPE DESCRIPTION -------------------------------------------------------------FS-615 06-20-91 Water Potable water, Jimmy's
1225 Grab Resturaunt
FS-616-Q 06-20-91 Water Ascorbic acid blank
1230 Grab
FS-616-W 06-20-91 Water Organic-free water system blank
1120 Grab
FS-630 07-31-91 Water VOA trip blank
FS-631
FS-632
FS-650
FS-651
FS-M07-SLI
FS-M0B-SLI
FS-M09-SLI
FS-Ml0-SLI
1405
07/31/91
1410
07/31/91
1415
09-12-91
09-12-91
Grab
06-20-91
1200
06-20-91
1200
06-20-91
1200
06-20-91
1200
Grab
Water
Grab
Soil
Grab
Water
Grab
Water
Soil
Grab
Soil
Grab
Soil
Grab
Soil
Grab
2-38
Preservative blank
Trip blank, VOA
Preservative blank
Trip blank
Monitoring well MW-7
IDW -cuttings
Monitoring well MW-8
IDW -cuttings
Monitoring welll MW-9
IDW -cuttings
Monitoring well MW-10
IDW -cuttings
- - -- - - --
FS-601 FS-606
ORG FREE ORG FREE WATER WATER
06/05/91 06/10/91
1530 1710
INORGANIC ELEMENTS MG/L MG.IL
CALCIUM
IRON
MAGNESIUM
POTASSIUM SODIUM
UG/L UG/L
ALUMINUM BARIUM
COPPER
MERCURY O.JJ
STRONTIUM
T1TANIUM
ZINC
EXTRACTABLE ORGANIC CCX'-'IPOU!lDS IJG/L UG/L
81S(2~ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE 33 HEXADECANOIC ACID
F!IRGEABLE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS !JG/L LlG/L
BRC:X--ODICHLORCX'-'IETHANE
CHLOROFORM DJBRor-xx::HLOROMETHANE ACETIC ACID, METHYL ESTER
I SOPROPANOL
ftftRRhftftftftftftftftftftftftftftftftftftftftftftftftftftftftftftftftftAftftftftftftftftftftftftftftftftftftftftftftft
,,,·, ''FOOTNOTES''''*
NA NOT ANALYZED J ESTIMATED VALUE N PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED
-- - -
TABLE 2-5
ANALYTICAL DATA SUtflARY
QA/QC SAMPLES, MAY AND JUNE FCX-STATESVILLE
STATESVILLE, NORTH CAROLI NA
FS-616-W fS-605 FS-600 FS-60t.
ORG FREE TRIP EQ BLK EQ BLK
WATER BLANK COMBO COMBO
06/20/91 06/07/91 06/05/91 06/07/91
1120 oat. s l St. 5 0925
W,/L MG/L MG/L MG/L
0 16
UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L
6.2
UG/L UG/L UG/1. UG/L
UG/i. UG/L UG/L UG/L
IOOJN
7JN
2-39
---11!11!1 l!B!!I
FS-609 FS-610 F-615 FS-616-Q ORQ-1 EO BLK EQ BLK POT WAT ASCORBIC DRL RIG COMBO AUGER Jlt-1'1YS BLANK TANK
06/13/91 06/13/91 06/20/91 05/20/91 05/29/91
1325 1350 1225 1230 1510
MG/L MG/L r->:;/L MG/L MG/L
0. '.:,4 0. 14 ' 9 NA NA
0.052 0. 078 0. 023 NA NA
l 5 NA NA
2 .0 NA NA
0.28 9 2 NA NA
UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L
57 69 57 NA NA 19 NA NA 10 NA NA NA NA
28 NA NA 3.0 NA NA
5.5 5.' NA NA
UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L
NA 7JN
UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L
7.7J 6.3
58 17
2.0J
-- -- - - - - - - -
INORGANIC ELEMENTS (WATER) METALS AND CYANIDE
PURGEABLE ORGAN l C C~POUNDS (WATER)
PURGEABLE ORGANIC COMPOllNDS
CSOIL)
,, ,·, ,.,rooTNOTEs,·,,, ,.,
NO COMPOUNDS DETECTED
NA -NOT ANAL'llED
TABLE 2-6
ANALYTICAL DATA S1Jfut1ARY
QA/QC SN1PLES, JULY FCX-STATESVILLE
STATESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA
FS-630
TRIP BLANK
07/31/9]
J 1.05
UG/L
NA
UG.IKG
FS-650
PRES. BLANK
09/12/91
llG/L
NA
llG/KG
NA
FS-651
TRIP BLANK
09/12/81
UG/L
NA
NA
tTG/KG
2-40
-- - - - ---
I
I laboratory's routine procedures for assessing precision and
accuracy. These aspects of quality control and assurance are I covered in the Analytical Support Branch LOQCM (15), for in-house
analyses, or the CLP Statement of Work, for analyses run through
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
the contract laboratory program.
2.5.4 Precision, Accuracy, Representativeness,
Completeness, and Comparibility
The precision, comparibility and accuracy of sample analysis
is addressed in the Analytical Support Branch Laboratory
Operations and Quality Control Manual (ASBLOQCM) (15) and the
most recent CLP Statement of Work. All samples were collected in
accordance with the Environmental Compliance Branch Standard
Operating Procedures and Oualilty Assurance Manual (ECBSOPQAM),
February 1, 1991, (14), which resulted in the collection of
representative samples of the various·media. One-hundred percent
of the samples collected were analyzed. One sample was lost or
broken at one of the CLP laboratories, but completeness was
achieved by resampling the location prior to the end of the
investigation.
2.6 Investigation Derived Waste Management
Material subject to investigation derived waste
characterization and management generated during the initial
phase of the investigation includes:
Drill cuttings
Purge and development water from monitoring wells
Warehouse floor decontamination water
Decontamination fluids generated at the decontamination
pad
Dirty clothing and other garbage generated during
activities, including Tyvek™ suits, cement and
bentonite bags, plastic sheeting, cardboard boxes,
aluminum foil, etc.
2-41
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
All material included in the last bulleted category above
were bagged and placed in a leased roll-off container and
disposed of by a locally contracted solid waste management firm.
The other materials continue to be stored at the site. They will
be sampled during Phase II activities and disposed of
appropriately with additional similar materials generated during
the subsequent activities.
2-42
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~·
3. 0 PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF THE STUDY AREA
3.1 Environmental Setting
3. 1. 1 Landforms
The FCXS site is located in Iredell County, in the Upper
Piedmont Plateau of North Carolina. The topography of the area
can be generally characterized as gently rolling and sloping,
with slopes on-site ranging up to 1.5 percent. Slopes in the
immediate area range from 2 to 6 percent, however. Elevations
within a four-mile radius of the site range from 740 to 970 feet
above mean sea level. (13) (16)
3. 1. 2 Surface Waters
Surface waters identified within a five mile radius of the
Site include both Third Creek and Fourth Creek, as well as their
tributaries. The closest of the creeks is Third Creek, which is
approximately 1.5 miles southeast of the site (two (2) miles
stream distance). As can be seen in Figure 3-1, all surface
water within this area discharges into the South Yadkin River
approximately 15 miles to the east. This river is a major
drainage feature for the Piedmont region east and south of the
site. ( 5)
3. 1. 3 Geology and Soils
3.1.3.1 Regional Geology and Area Soils
The FCXS site is located in the Piedmont Physiographic
Province, within the lithologic and structural feature referred
to as the Blue Ridge-Inner Piedmont Belt (18). Rock types within
this region are primarily gneisses and schists, as well as
gradations of the two types. These rocks are typically fractured
3-1
-- - -
APPROXIMATE OVERLAND PA TH
OF UNNAMED TRIBUTARY
FROM' FCX-STATESVIL1£ SITE
TO iHIRO CREEK
- - - - - -
THIRD,-.,,... ~n<EI(
-- - - - - - - -
APPROXIMATE SCALE FIGURE 3-1
AREA SURFACE WATER
FCX-STA TESVILLE
STATESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA
14520 0 I~-
( IN FEET )
1 Inch -14520 ft.
7260
I
14520
I
FROM': SALISBURY, NORTI-i CAROLINA
1: 100,000 -SCALE PL.ANIMETRIC MAP
UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY, 1985
I
I to varying degrees and may display a prominent gneissic or
schistose structure. In addition to this metamorphic suite of
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
rocks, granitic intrusions are also common in this region.
Available geologic maps indicate that the fCXS site is located
very near the contact between a granitic intrusion and a rock
unit characterized as a hornblende gneiss. Figure 3-2 is typical
of these maps.
Soils in the general area of the Site belong to the Lloyd
Association. These soils, located on broad ridges with short
side slopes, are characterized as deep, well drained soils with a
subsoil of dark-red clay. The underlying lithology is typically
a mix of acidic and basic rocks. (16)
3.1.3.2 Site-Specific Geology and Soils
While conducting soil sampling and while installing
monitoring wells for the remedial investigation, there was ample
opportunity to examine surficial and subsurface soils and
geological materials. Observations of these materials indicate
that the site is located within the large, irregular band of
hornblende gneiss shown near the center of the geologic map in
Figure 3-2. The literature indicates that hornblende gneiss
typically weathers to a deep red or brown soil in this region.
Based on the deep red to brown soils observed at the
site, it is presumed that the site is underlain by the hornblende
gneiss. (16) (18)
The site is located near the eastern edge of the hornblende
gneiss, near its contact with the granitic intrusive body just to
the east. Numerous pegmatitic stringers, characterized by white
to light tan weathered coarse crystalline material, including
quartz and large weathered feldspar crystals, were encountered in
several of the boreholes drilled during monitoring well
installations on site. Pegmatites or pegmatitic stringers are
3-3
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
After: LeGrand, Geology and Ground Water in the Statesville oreo North Car'olioo-1954. I SCALE
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
0 2.5 5
MILES
~ Mica schist and granite, schist predominant.
CI] Hornblende gneiss.
tw3 Composite gneiss with considerable hornblende gneiss.
DIIIl]] Composite gneiss, chiefly quartz-biotite gneiss.
~ Gabbro-diorite and allied basic rocks.
FIGURE 3-2
: &EPA
AREA GEOLOGIC MAP
FCX-STATESVILLE
STATESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
typically found in country rock material, near contacts between
igneous intrusive bodies and the surrounding country rock.
Soil and weathered overburden of varyjng thickness, col-
lectively referred to as residuum, overly the gneiss. The soil
are classified as fine sandy loams which have been eroded. In
the immediate area the residuum ranges in thickness from only a
few feet to over 100 feet, averaging 35-feet thick. Boring logs
for wells installed at the FCXS site during the remedial
investigation and previous investigations indicate that residuum
at the Site is up to 60 to 70-feet thick (17) (18). During
drilling associated with monitoring well construction for this
investigation, depths to rock ranging from 45 feet to 60 feet
were encountered. The shallower depths of overburden were
encountered near the top of the ridge, in the area located
between the FCXS site and Burlington Industries.
3.1.4 Ground Water
3.1.4.1 Regional Hydrogeology
A general, hydrogeological scenario has been developed for
the Piedmont region of North Carolina and other geologically
similar areas. Typically, a layer of residuum, comprised of
surficial soil and saprolite, overlies a fractured, unweathered
bedrock. The type of bedrock, the nature of the weathering
interval and degree of fracturing varies from one area to
another. In the most general terms, the saprolite serves as a
ground water reservoir, created primarily by the accumulation of
infiltrated precipitation. This reservoir supplies ground water
to the fractures, faults and other secondary permeability
features in the bedrock. Ground, water systems in these areas,
therefore, are generally one, interconnected system, with the
majority of ground water within this system usually occurring at
depths less than 150 feet. The ground water surface within the
3-5
\
I
I
I
\
residuum is normally a subdued replica of the surface topography,
i.e., ground water flow generally occurs from higher elevations
to lower elevations. Flow is typically perpendicular to
potentiometric contour lines and towards the direction of streams I and rivers, where ground water discharge occurs. (17) (18)
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Yields for wells in the area are highly variable and depend
on a number of factors. In general, saprolite wells have lower
yields than wells installed in the fractured bedrock. Within the
bedrock, yields are a function of the number and size of frac-
tures,. faults or other permeablility features encountered by the
well bore, as well as pumping level. The average yield for
drilled wells six inches in diameter in the area is less than 19
gallons per minute, although the deep well located on the
Carnation Milk Company property reportedly yields in excess of
500 gallons per minute. Many home water supply wells yield less
than 10 gallons per minute. (18)
3.1.4.2 Aquifer Use
Although there are several public water supplies within
Iredell County, including the Statesville public water supply,
the West Iredell Water Company, and the Iredell County Water
Corporation, there are apparently no consumers within a four-mile
radius of the site which rely on a ground water-based public
water supply. There are numerous homes, however, representing as
many as 4,500 people within the four-mile radius of the site,
which have private water supply wells. It is not known how many
of these homes are using their private wells or have been hooked-
up to one of the available public water supplies. (12) (18)
3.1.4.3 Site-specific Hydrogeology
Site-specific information developed during the remedial
investigation, as well as previous investigations, indicates that
3-6
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
the hydrogeology of the site is typical of the regional scenario.
Based on well logs from previous investigations and on data
gathered during the remedial investigation, the saturated portion
of the saprolite and residuum located above competent, unweather-
ed bedrock ranges from as little as 15 to 20 feet, along the
ridge crest, to as much as 30'to 40 feet along the flanks.
(4) (18)
Saprolite wells generally supported continuous withdrawal
rates of one-quarter to one-half gallon per minute, with little
or no drawdown, during sampling at all well locations.
Considerable heterogeneity was encountered, however, in the two
on-site bedrock wells. Well MW-6D supported a withdrawal rate of
approximately 9.5 gallons per minute with no drawdown after an
initial small drawdown at the onset of purging. MW-6D supported
this withdrawal rate continuously while over 100 gallons were
removed prior to sampling. The other deep well, MW-5D, though
constructed similarly to MW-6D, produced very little water when
purged. After pumping the well down to a constriction at the
surface casing/cored bedrock interval, there was little
measurable recovery, considerably less than a half-gallon per
hour.
Site-specific ground water flow conditions were evaluated as
a part of this investigation. Water levels obtained from on-site
monitoring wells were plotted on a site map and, using this data,
equipotential lines were manually contoured. Figure 3-3 shows
ground water contours, as well as the surface topography. It
appears, based on this representation, that ground water beneath
the western portion of the site is generally flowing in a east-
southeasterly direction. Under the eastern portion of the site,
however, the contour pattern changes significantly, indicating a
shift in flow direction to near southerly. This corresponds
extremely well to the pattern of topographic contours shown in
the figure.
3-7
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - --·-~ l!!i!II
79.0
_.-/
LEGEND
WATER TABLE CONTOUR
(ELEVATION, IN FEET,
RELATIVE TO ARBITRARY BENCHMARK)
MONITORING WELL DESIGNATION
APPROXIMATE SCALE
111D O IO 100 1-1------I I (NFUT)
~EPA
--80.0
_,. 79.0 -I _ -1s.o
--76.0
10
. ·-... ---z5.46
MW-65e"
MW 6~ r--t--+--
--. 75.0
I :: 73.o4.o .;,--;--;-._
FIGURE 3-3
WATER TABLE CONTOUR MAP
FCX-STATESVILLE
STATESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA
JULY 29,1992 '
--
NOTE: NOT TO SCAL£
.o
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Additional, more detailed site-specific hydrogeological
characterization will b~ provided in the addendum to the report
to follow after the second phase of investigation. This
characterization will include descriptions-of average hydraulic
conductivities and related properties, such as specific capacity,
encountered at overburden well locations across the site. This
characterization will be based on the results of either single
well slug test or small-scale, stepped-drawdown single well
pumping tests. If appropriate, pump test utilizing selected on-
site shallow monitoring wells as observation wells and well MW-60
as the pumping well will be conducted. Existing well MW-50 does
not yield enough water to warrant consideration for a separate
pump test.
3.1.5 Meteorology
The climate in Iredell County, North Carolina is classified
as fairly mild, and is influenced by the mountain ranges to the
northeast and the Atlantic Ocean to the southeast. Prevailing
winds are from the southwest, although northeast winds do I frequently occur in the autumn. Relative humidity averages about
70 percent throughout the year. Monthly total precipitation
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
generally ranges from about 3 inches during October and November
to about 5 inches during July and August. The following are
summaries of the area's temperatures, precipitation, and storm
events. ( 5)
Seasonal Temgeratures ( °Fl :
January July
Mean Maximum 46-50 88-90
Mean Minimum 24-28 68-72
Avg. 42-44 78
3-9
I
D
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Precipitation (inches):
Mean Annual Precip.
Mean Annual Evap.
Net Annual Precip.
Mean Annual Snowfall
1 yr/24 hr Rainfall
Storm Events:
44-48
40-42
4-6
6-8
2.5-3
Mean days/year with thunderstorms
Prevailing winds and wind speeds
3-10
40-60
SW at 9
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
4.0 NATURE AND EXTENT OF CONTAMINATION
Soil, ground water, surface water and sediment samples were
collected to identify and fully characterize contaminants present
at the FCX-Statesville site. In addition to the sampling
conducted to characterize the site, an exploratory soil boring
program was implemented in an effort to locate pits or trenches
where waste was allegedly buried on site. This section of the
report addresses the findings of this investigation.
4.1 Soil
One-hundred and eighty-seven (187) samples were collected to
characterize the nature and extent of soil contamination at the
FCX-Statesville site. Table 4-1, Soil Sample Summary Table,
contains a general summary of the number of detects, the range of
concentrations and the mean concentration for each of the metals
or compounds detected in at least one sample. Tables 4-2, 4-3,
and 4-4 are the analytical data summaries for Areas 1, 2, and 3,
respectively. The complete data set is located in Appendix B.
The samples are described in Table 2-1.
Based on historical and operational site considerations, the
site was divided into three areas for sampling during the field
investigation. Area 1, generally comprising the off-site
locations, is discussed separately from Areas 2 and 3, comprising
all on-site sample locations, as well as those locations along
the railroad tracks between the site and Burlington Industries.
4.1.1 Background Soil
Background soils were collected at the surface and at depths
of 24 inches and 48 inches at station FS-127, located west of the I site. This location is on the same ridge as the site and has the
I 4-1
I
I TABLE 4-1
SOIL SAJ1PLE SUMMARY
FCX-STATESVILLE REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION I STATESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA
NUMBER OF NUMBER OF
I METALS SAJ1PLES 1 DETECTS RANGE MEAN 2
(mg/kg) (mg/kg) Aluminum 187 187 4,600 -42,000 13,972
I Iron 187 187 1,100 -99,000 51,576.5 Manganese 187 187 12 -3,100 339.2
Chromium 187 186 ND3 -1,200 92.87 Lead 187 186 ND 3,100 45.78 I Vanadium 187 186 ND 330 112. 9 Barium 187 185 ND 510 72.29 Magnesium 187 183 ND 23,000 1875. 08
I Potassium 187 166 ND 13,000 1818.1 Nickel 187 161 ND 100 26.14 Calcium 187 . 148 ND 170,000 4,102.4
Zinc 187 146 ND 3,900 101.6 I Copper 187 124 ND 400 41.18 Cobalr 187 101 ND 84 14.31
Arsenic 187 31 ND 11 4.03 I Mercury 187 19 ND 5.7 0.64
Bery 11 ium 187 12 ND 2.2 1.65
Sodium 187 11 ND 320 211. 82
I Cadmium 187 11 ND 1. 6 1.12
Selenium 187 6 ND 2.4 2.1 Thallium 187 3 ND 2 1.1
Titanium 11 11 270 -1,300 640 I Yttrium 11 9 ND 14 7.24
Strontium 11 4 ND 54 16.05
Tin 11 1 ND 27 27
I PESTICIDES/PCBS (ug/kg) (ug/kg)
4. 4 '-DDT 187 57 ND 830,000 26,877.6 I 4, 4 '-DDD 187 41 ND 160,000 7,402.6 4, 4 '-DDE 187 25 ND 1,800 279 .5
Alpha-chlordane 187 14 ND 1,400 288.14
I Gamma-chlordane 187 12 ND 1,800 379 .5
Dieldrin 187 10 ND 40,000 5486.9 Endrin 187 5 ND 2,500 682
I Heptachlor 187 5 ND 430 106 Beta-BHC 187 3 ND 2.700 925.3 Gamma-BHC (Lindane) 187 3 ND 48 41.3
Heprachlor epoxide 187 3 ND 63 32.3 I Alpha-BHC 187 2 ND 130 77.5 Aldrin 187 1 ND -38 38
I
I 4-2
I
I
I TABLE 4-1 (Cont.)
SOIL SN!PLE SUHHARY
I FCX-STAIESVILLE REHEDIAL INVESTIGAIION
STAIESVILLE, NORI// CAROLINA
EXTRACTABLE ORGANIC NUHBER OF NUHBER OF
I COHPOUNDS SAHPLES DETECTS RANGE HEAN
(ug/kg) (ug/kg Pyrene 187 23 ND 170,000 8,248
I Benzo(b/k)fluoranihene 187 22 ND 14.000 2,179.5 F luoranthene 187 22 ND 170,000 8,616.2 Chrysene 187 20 ND 11,000 1,338 Benzo ( a)anthracene 187 18 ND 11,000 1,298.2 I Benzo(a)pyrene 187 18 ND 7,500 1,438.9 Ideno(l .2,3-CD)pyrene 187 17 ND 5,400 1,042.3 Benzo(G,H.I)perylene 187 16 ND 5,800 1185
I Phenanthrene 187 15 ND 21.000 2,253 Penr:achlorophenol 187 12 ND 420.000 69,280 Acenaphthylene 187 9 ND 2,200 726 .2
Anr.hrace11e 187 8 ND 5.200 1,363.1 I Benzopy rene (nor A) 187 8 ND 2,000 825 2-Hethylnaphthalene 187 7 ND 3,400 925.7 Dibenzo (A. II )anthracene 187 4 ND 2,300 1090
I Naphthalene 187 4 ND 1.500 587.2 Dimethylnaphthalene 187 4 ND 10,000 6,750 Bis(2-ethylhexvl)-
I phthalate 187 J ND 11. 000 7,200
Acenaphthene 187 3 ND 3,300 1246.6 F luorene 187 3 ND 3.300 1743.3 Di-N-bucylphthalate 187 J ND 920 359.3 I Mer.hv lanthracene 187 2 ND 2.000 1,150
Hethylphe11a11tl1re11e 187 2 ND 7.000 4,000
Pervlene 187 2 ND 1,000 700
I Chloropropylace 187 2 ND 3,000 2,500 1-Hethylnaphthalene 187 2 ND 3,000 2,000
Dodecane 187 2 ND 9,000 6,500
Hepcadecane 187 2 ND 10,000 8,500 I Penr.adecane 187 2 ND 10,000 8,500 Tridecane 187 2 ND 10,000 8,000
Undecane 187 2 ,\'D 7,000 5,500 I Di ch lorobenzopf1e11one 187 1 ND 500 500 Octachlorodibenzo-
dioxin 187 1 ND 3,000 3,000
I Tet ra.chlorophenol 187 1 ND 6,000 6,000 Cyc lop en taphenan threne 187 1 ND 2,000 2,000
Phenylnaphthalene 187 1 ND 1,000 1,000 Dodecane60 187 1 ND 6,000 6,000 I Eicosane 187 1 ND 4,000 4,000
Hexadecane 187 1 ND 10,000 10,000 Nonadecane 187 1 ND 8,000 8,000
I Octadecane 187 1 ND 5,000 5,000
Tetradecane 187 1 ND 10,000 10,000
I 4-3
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
\
TABLE 4-1 (Cont.)
SOIL SA11PLE SUMMARY
FCX-STATESVILLE REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION
STATESVILLE, NORIH CAROLINA
EXTRACTABLE ORGANIC
COMPOUNDS
Bis(2-chloroethyl)-
NUMBER OF
SAJ1PLES
ether 187
Hexadecanoic acid 187
Octadecanoic acid 187
Octahydrodimethyl(methyl-
ethyl)phenanthrene
carboxylic acid 187
Ocrahydrodimethvl(methyl-
ethyl)phenanrhrene carboxvlic
acid. merhvlester 187
Di-N-ocrylphthalate 187
Methy lchryse!le 18 7
Methylpyrene 187
Phenylfluorene 187
Methylfluorallthene 187
PURGEABLE ORGANIC
COMPOUNDS
Trichloroerhene 187
Tetrachloroethvlm,e 187
Acetone 187
1.2-Dichloroethene 187
Tetrahydorfurall 187
Chloroform 187
Total xylene 187
Ethyl benzene 187
Chlorobenzene 187
P inene 187
Trimethylcyclohexane 187
Ethylmethylcvclo-
hexane 187
FOOTNOTES:
NUMBER OF
DETECTS
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
23
7
3
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
RANGE
(ug/kg) _
ND 780
ND 3,000
ND 700
ND -1.000
ND 500
ND 1 .200
ND 1,000
ND 2,000
ND -· 500
ND -400
ND 21
ND 15
ND 550
ND 4
ND 10
ND 2
ND 22
ND 1
ND 2
ND 60
ND 60
ND 80
HEAN
(ug/kg)
780
3,000
700
1,000
500
1.200
1.000
2,000
500
400
3.65
5.28
450
4
10
2
22
1
2
60
60
80
1 Does nor include duplicate samples. At locations where duplicate samples were
collected, the highest value for r:he detected compound was used for this
2
3
summary.
The mean value was
for each compound.
determination.
ND -The compound
calculated by averaging only the detected concentrations
All 11011-detecteded rest1lts were not considered in this
was not detected at c:he minimum quant:if ication limit ..
4-4
-- - ----- - - - - -----1!!11!1
TABLE ti-2a
ANALYTICAL DATA SUr-MARY
AREA l SOILS FCX-STATESVILLE STATESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA
FS-100-FS-101-FS-101-FS-101-FS-102 FS-107-FS-108-FS-109-FS-13 l FS-110-FS-111-rs-112-SLA SLA SLB SLC SLA SLA SLA SLA DUPE OF SLA SLA SLA 0"-12" 0"-12" 2t."-30"" li8"-54" o··-12" 0"-6' 0''-6" 0"-6" FS-109 o··-5 .. 0'"-6" O" -6" 07/31/91 07/31/91 07/31/91 07/31/91 07/31/91 06/Qi,/91 06/04/91 06/04/91 06/04/91 06/0lo/91 06/04/91 06/04/91 08li5 0830 08J5 0915 0900 1355 1410 lli20 1425 1435 1550 1525
INORGANIC ELEMENTS t-'G/KG t,K;/KG MG/KG MG/KG MG/KG MG/KG MG/KG MG/KG f-(;/KG M:;/KG MG/KG MG/KG
ALUMINUM 26000 32000 28000 17000 21000 13000 20000 21000 25000 25000 27000 22000 ANTIMONY 3. 4UR 3. 7UR 4 .3UR 4. ZUR 3.6UR 3. 6UR ARSENIC 5. 1 5. 8 2.3J 3J 2.9J 2 lJ BARIUM 15 25 15 9.0 70 100 51 22 29 42 35 51 BERYLLIUM 2.0 CALCIUM 220 560 330 2100 lt.00 2200 2900 870 1000 660 CHRct1IUM 56 B2 I' 0 120 ,5 36J 51J '6J ,9J 52J 99J lOOJ COBALT 1, 13 COPPiR 25 20 31 31 12 29J 3'J 29J..--IRON 62000 52000 79000 91000 23000 2G000 35000 53000 5G000 4 5000 66000 53000 LEAD 21 22 20 12 32 180J 72J 29J 33J 5'1 2BJ 3'J MAGNESIUM 370 ,20 320 220 370 2G00 930 "0 580 5,0 610 390 MANGANESE 160 320 270 300 1100 2103 270J l80J 210J 190J 290J 400J MERCURY 0.08 0. 10 0. 11 0. l 4 0.07 MOLYBDENUM NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NICKEL 9.6 1, 27 8., 9.2 6.6 ' . 3 5. 9 5 18 1, POTASSIUM 620 1800 890 330 370 ,go 7'0 "0 SELENIUM 2 ,J l. 9J I.BJ 2J 0.81UR 0.96UR l. 9J STRONTIUM 3. 7. NA NA NA NA NA NA NA TELLURIUM NA NA NA NA NA NA NA TlN NA NA NA NA NA NA NA TITANJUM 1100 57.0 a,o lJOO ,oo NA NA NA NA NA NA NA VANADIUM 110 120 180 210 58 67. 82 130 130 110 190 ]t,Q YTTRIUM I,. I l,. {) 9. I NA NA NA NA NA NA NA ZINC 15 3,, 32 " 30 ]90J 66J 32J '9J 78J ,5J lOOJ
'EST IC I DE/PCB CCT-'!POUNDS UG/KG UG/KG IJG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG VG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG
t., t.' -ODD (P,P'-DDD) 180 G.G'-DDE (P,P'-DOE) ,ao 38 II 0 61' G. t,' -DDT (P,P'-DDT) 5~0 26 ALPHA-CHLORDANE /2 NA NA NA NA NA 210 170 HEPTACHLOR EPOXIDE 63 " XTRACTABLE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG
2,4-DINITROTOLUENE 730UR 770UR 860UR 8SOUR 820UR 82DUR 820UR CARBAZOLE NA NA NA NA NA NA NA PYRENE 170 J
URGEABLE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG
ACETONE SSOJ
~·•····························································· ''*FOOTNOTES*** NA NOT ANALYZED; ---MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED J ESTJMATED VALUE: U -MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS MINJMUM QUANTJFICATION LIMIT. R QUALJTY CONTROL JNDICATES THAT DATA ARE UNUSEABLE, COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT RESAMPLJNG AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATJON, THE VALUE IS THAT REPORTED BY THE LABORATORY
4-5
-- - -- - - - - - - - --l!l!!l ==
TABLE 4-Zb
ANALYTICAL DATA SUl'-t1ARY
AREA 1 SOI LS, CONTINUED FCX-STATESVILLE STATESVILLE, NORTH CAROL INA
FS-113-FS-1 }lo-FS-115-FS-116-FS-132-FS-117-FS-118- FS-119-FS-120-FS-121-FS-133-FS-122-SLA SLA SLA SLA SLA SLA SLA SLA SLA SLA SLA SLA.,.
0" - 6 .. O'" -5·· O" -6'" 0" - 6 .. 0"-6 .. 0"'-6"' 0"-6" O"' -5·· o··-5•· 0"-6" 0"-6" o··-s··
06/04/91 06/01.o/91 06/04/91 06/04/91 06/04/91 06/04/91 06/04/91 06/04/91 06/0li/91 06/0t./91 06/0li/91 06/04/91 1 540 1500 1525 1535 l 5t.0 1550 1600 1610 1710 1720 1725 1730
lNORGANIC ELEMENTS MG/KG MG:KG MG/KG MG/KG MG/KG MG/KG MG/KG MG/KG MG/KG MG/KG MG/KG M:;/KG
ARSENIC 7. 4J
BARIUM 29 170 230 91 100 35 "0 27 190 34 33 21 BERYLLIUM I. 2.
COBALT 19 14 CHROMIUM 91J 63J 94J 78J 80J 66J 56J 170J 46J 56J 59J 59J COPPER 48 27J 28J 29J 29J 27J 49 2BJ 29J NICKEL 28 32 9 15 12 B.B 14 6.8 23 5. 7 6.9 8.2 LEAD 37J llOJ 76J 39J 35J 36J 3100J 31J 1 7 J 25J 30J 44J ANTIMJNY 3.9UR 4UR 2. BUR 2. 7UR 2.8UR SELENIUM 1. 9J 2.JJ 0.85UR 0.91UR 0 89UR 0.94UR 0. 94UR 0.91UR 0.83UR 0.93UR O. 93UR !UR VANADIUM 170 83 62 110 99 110 55 130 71 90 97 220 ZINC 50J 170J 220J 83J 86J 37J 300J 44J 82J 39J 40J ALUMINUM 18000 18000 J°3000 23000 22000 23000 16000 19000 20000 25000 24000 23000 MANGANESE 240J 900J 600J 880J 780-1 150J 870J 230J 360J l40J lSOJ 230J CALCIUM 820 1600 4100 990 930 750 18000 1600 2700 970 960 830 MAGNESIUM 860 1700 490 420 470 390 1300 790 4500 360 380 ,ao lRON 57000 35000 28000 44000 42000 43000 25000 54000 36000 46000 47000 63000 SODIUM 320 POTASSIUM 840 2300 550 640 630 420 1200 490 5600 380 350 460
'ESTICIDE/PCB COMPOUNDS UG/KG UG/KG !JG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG
HEPTACHLOR 19 4.4'-DDT (P,P'-DDT) 56 4,4'-DDE (P,P'-DDE) 110 ENDRIN 160J GAfl-tA-CHLORDANE /2 120 ALPHA-CHLORDANE /2 Bl J
XTRACTABLE ORGANIC CCX'1POUNDS UG/KG UG/KG LJG/KG llG/KG llG/KG llG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UGfKG UG/KG UG/KG
2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE 240 J NAPHTHALENE 600 J ACENAPHTHENE 3300 820 DIBENZOFURAN 2100 480 J
4-6
-- - -- - - - --- - - - -
1!!111 llll!!!!l ,1!!111!1
TABLE 4-2b
ANALYTICAL DATA SUl'flARY AREA 1 SOILS, CONTINUED FCX-STATESVJLLE STATESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA
FS-113- FS-114-FS-115-FS-116-FS-132-FS-117-FS-118-FS-119-FS-120-FS-121-FS-133-FS-122-SLA SLA SLA SLA SLA SLA SLA SLA SLA SLA SLA SLA o .. -6 .. o··-5·· 0"-6" 0"'-6"' o··-5·· 0"-6" o··-s .. o··-s·· o··-s .. 0"-6"' o··-5 .. 0"-6""
06/0li/91 06/04/91 06/04/91 06/0li/91 06/0lo/91 06/04/91 06/04/91 06/04 /91 06/04/91 06/04/91 06/04/91 06/04/91 1540 I 500 1525 153 5 l Sli 0 1550 1600 1610 1710 1720 1725 1730
\TRACTABLE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG
2.4-DINITROTOLUENE 780UR 780UR 790UR 790UR 780UR 780UR 800UR 790UR 850UR 790UR 790UR 720UR FLUORENE 3300 890 PHENANTHRENE 390 J 150 J 21000 6000 ANTHRACENE 5200 1300 FLUORANTHENE 510 J 170 J 170000 7100 PYRENE 4'0 J 1' 0 J 170000J 4100 BENZO(AJANTHRACENE 260 J llOOOJ 2100 CHRYSENE 260 J llOOOJ 2500 BENZOCB AND/OR KJFLUORANTHENE l4000J 4100 BENZO(B AND/OR K)FLUORANTHENE l4000J 4100 BENZO-A-PYRENE 7500J 2100 INDENO (1.2,3-CD) PYRENE 5400J 1300 DIBENZO(A.H)ANTHRACENE 2300J 570 J BENZO{GH1)PERYLENE SSOOJ 1200 CARBAZOLE NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 750JN lOOOJN NA 2 UNIDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS ZOOOJ 4 UNIDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS 4000J DIBENZOTHIOPHENE 4QOJN METHYLPHENANTHRENE (3 ISOMERS) lOOOJN METHYLANTHRACENE 300JN BENZONAPHTHOFURAN SOOJN METHYL PYRE NE SOOJN CYCLOPENTAPYRENE 900JN METHYLPHENANTHRENE (2 ISOMERS) lOOOJN CYCLOPENTAPHENANTHRENE 700JN lOOOJN ANTHRACENEDIONE 700JN BENZOFLUORENE (2 ISOMERS) 3000JN ZOOOJN BENZANTHRACENEONE 400JN BENZONAPHTHOTHIOPHENE 600!N 400JN BENZOPHENANTHRENE 600JN SOOJN FLUORANTHENAMINE 400JN METHYLBENZANTHRACENE 400JN BENZACEPHENANTHRYLENE 3000JN BENZOFLUORANTHENE (NOT BORK) (2 ISOMERS) BOOOJN 3000JN
IRGEABLE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG
TETRACHLOROETHENE{TETRACHLOROETHYLENE) l J
·************************************************************** '''•FOOTNOTES•~••
NA NOT ANALYZED
J ESTIMATED VALUE
!l PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED u MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT R QUALITY CONTROL INDICATES THAT DATA ARE UNUSEABLE, COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESEUT RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION, THE VALUE IS THAT REPORTED BY THE LABORATORY
4-7
--- - - --- - - - - -- --lll!!i!!!!II l!!!l!!!!!I
TABLE li-2c
ANALYTICAL DATA SUM-1.A.RY
AREA 1 SOI LS , CONTINUED FCX-STATESVILLE
STATESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA
FS-123-FS-12t.-FS-lJt.-FS-125-FS-126-FS-127-FS-127-FS-127-SLA SLA SLA SLA SLA SLA SLB SLC 0 .. -5·· 0 .. -6'" o .. -6 .. o··-5·· 0 .. -6 .. 0"-6'" 24"-36 .. t.8''-60"
06/0t./91 06/0lo/91 06/0t. /91 06/04/91 06/04/91 03/25/92 06/06/91 06/06/91
164 5 1700 1710 l 70 5 1715 1800 154 5 1555
INORGANIC ELEMENTS MG/KG MG/KG MG/KG MG/KG MG/KG MG/KG MG/KG M::i/KG
ALUMINUM 8500 18000 16000 It.ODO 10000 18000 18000J 19000J ANTlf-ONY 2. 6UR 2.SUR 2.5UR 2.6UR ARSENIC 2.SJ 2.6J 2. lJ
BARIUM 31 110 90 100 78 '1 13 30
CADMIUM
CALCIUM 750 5000 2700 5900 44000 680 270J 280 CHR01IUM 19J 57J t. SJ 36J 36J 64 · " ]OJ COBALT 3. 7
COPPER 36J 34J 25 20 " IRON 36000 31000 27000 26000 19000 41000 48000 82000 LEAD 22J 9 4J 9J !BJ 63J 62 25J 37J MAGNESIUM 270 4400 2700 7300 23000 420 260 880 MANGANESE l40J 230J 220J 410J 220J 180 lOOJ 170J MERCURY 0. 12 NICKEL 7. 2 12 11 17 7. 5 '. 8 11 POTASSIUM 990 2~00 1900 2600 1700 290 1000 SELENIUM 0.93UR 0. 137UR 0.89UR 0. BOUR O. 79UR 0.94UR 5. 3UR VANADIUM 48 59 52 " " 93 llOJ 190J ZINC 35J 59J 72J 280J 110 30 42
EXTRACTABLE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG lTG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG
2,4-DINITROTOLUENE 790UR 730UR 740UR 700UR 690UR
PURGEABLE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG
ETHYL BENZENE !J TOTAL XYLENES 22J TRICHLOROETHENE(TRICHLOROETHYLENEJ SUR 1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE SUR 1.1.2.2-TETRACHLOROETHANE SUR 1, 1, 2-TRICHLOROETllANE SUR 1. 1-DICHLOROETHANE SUR 1, 1-DJCHLOROETHENE( 1, 1-DICHLOROETHYLENE J SUR 1.2-DJCHLOROETHANE 5UR 1.2-DICHLOROETHENE (TOTAL) SUR 1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE SUR
4-8
- - --
PURGEABLE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
ACETONE
BENZENE
BRCMJDICHLOROMETHANE
BRCMJFORM BRClMCX-'JETHANE
CARBON DISULFIDE CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
CHLOROBENZENE
CHLOROETHANE
CHLOROFORM
CHLOROMETHANE CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE DIBRc::>1-0CHLOROMETHANE METHYL BUTYL KETONE METHYL ETHYL KETONE METHYL JSOBUTYL KETONE METHYLENE CHLORIDE STYRENE
- -
TETRACHLOROETHENE ( TETRACHLOROETHYLENE J
TOLUENE
TRANS-I. 3-DJCHLOROPROPENE
VINYL CHLORIDE
,, ,., ,·,rooTNOTES * ,,.,.,
NA NOT ANALYZED
J ESTIMATED VALUE
MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED
- --- -
TABLE 4-Zc ANALYTICAL DATA SU1-t1ARY AREA 1 SOILS, CONTINUED FCX-STATESVILLE STATESVILLE. NORTH CAROLINA
FS-123-
SLA 0 .. -6"
06/04/91
164 S
UG/KG
FS-124-
SLA
0"-6""
06/04/91
1700
UG/KG
FS-13!.-
SLA O" -6 ..
06/04/91
1710
UG/KG
FS-125-
SLA o·· -6"'
06/04/91
. 1705
UG/KG
-
FS-126-
SLA 0"'-6"'
06/04/91
1715
UG/KG
l0UR
SUR
SUR
SUR
lOUR SUR SUR
SUR
IOUR SUR
!OUR
SUR
SUR
IOUR IOUR
lOUR ZOUR
SUR SUR
SUR SUR
lOUR
U MATERIAL WAS ANALYlED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT
R QUALITY CONTROL INDICATES THAT DATA ARE UNUSEABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY f/OT BE PRESENT
-
FS-127-
SLA o··-6 ..
06/06/91
1540
UG/KG
RESAf1PLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION. THE VALUE IS THAT REPORTED BY THE LABORATORY
4-9
- -
l!!B!!I l!!!l!I
FS-127-FS-127-
SLB SLC zi,··-35 .. 43··-50··
06/06/91 06/06/91
1545 1555
UG/KG UG/KG
----- -- - -- -- -- -- -
l!l!l!!I l!!!I!
TABLE t.-3a
ANALYTICAL DATA SUM'1ARY AREA 2 SOILS FCX-STATESVILLE STATESVILLE. NORTH CAROLI NA
FS-200-FS-200-FS-201· .rs-201-FS-202-FS-202-FS-203-FS-203-FS-204-FS-20io-FS-204-SLA SLB SLA SLB SLA SLB SLA SLB SLA SLB SLC O" -6 .. zt.·· -35·· o··-5·· 24"·36" O" •6" 24"-36" o·•-5·· 24"•36"' 0"-6" 24"-36" 48"-60" 06/06/91 06/06/91 06/06/91 06/06/91 06/06/91 06/06/91 06/06/91 06/06/91 06/06/91 05/06/91 06/06/91 l'-20 1425 l 1..05 1410 1350 1355 llt.5 1155 llOO 1110 1120
INORGANIC ELEMENTS MG/KG MG/KG MG/KG MG/KG t-x:;/KG MG/KG t-r;/KG f,(;/KG MG/KG t-X;/KG r-x:;/KG
ALUMINUM llOOOJ 7600J l I000J 7 700J 19000J 28000 21000J t. l000J 18000J ZOOOOJ 40000J ANTIMONY 2.SUR 3. 6UR ' 2UR t.. lUR t.. 6UR ,u. 4.3UR 3.6UR 'LiR 4.3UR ARSENIC 0.SIUR 0.liZUR O. 42UR 0.54UR 0. 49UR BARIUM 14 12 35 33 62 ,9 77 64 190 36 19 CALCIUM 250 5,0 170 720 210 1600 3900 980 590 CHROMIUM 59J "J 52J lOOJ 120J JJOJ lJOJ 340J 68J 71J 250J COBALT 5.2 2 g 5. 2 11 21 5, 8.6 45 13 5.' 9.' COPPER 36 " ,o 27 37 36 80 45 26 ,o IRON 56000 1.8000 50000 67000 87000 77000J 63000 99000 44000 1.9000 88000 LEAD 19J 16J l)J 21J 18J 8.8J '3J 12J 17J 33J 13J MAGNESIUM 270 200 7'0 3'0 1100 3'0 2700 230 1.600 550 '70 MANGANESE 130J 170J 210J 360J 990J 11.00J 270J 1300J JOOJ 290J 340J NICKEL 5. 9 2.' 6.8 11 " 70 17 64 22 7 30 POTASSIUM 280 760 1200 280 2700 300 5300 620 390 SELENIUM 0.97UR lUR 0. 95llR 1..2UR i.. ZUR 1. IUR 0.93UR 4.9UR 0.91UR 0.95UR 5.3UR VANADIUM IZOJ llOJ llOJ 180J 21.0J 190J 150J 300J lOOJ llOJ ZOOJ ZINC 68 B2 84 100 46 " 80
PESTICIDE/PCB COMPOUNDS LIG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG
i.. i. · -DOD CP.P'-000) 'l 60 3400C 530C 58 i.. i.' -ODE (P.P'-DDE) 110 180JC 4.4'-DDT {P,P'-DDT) 90 4900C 160 ALPHA-CHLORDANE /2 l40J GAM'-1.1\.-CHLORDANE /2 150J
EXTRACTABLE ORGANIC Ca-1POUNDS UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG
PENTACHLOROPHENOL 3500J 4 UNIDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS 8000J
PURGEABLE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG
CHLOROBENZENE 2J TRICHLOROETHF.NE{TRICHLOROETHYLENE) 4J
************!**************••·································•*
***FOOTNOTES•••
NA NOT ANALYZED
J ESTIMATED VALUE
MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED u MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT R QUALITY CONTROL INDICATES THAT DATA ARE UNUSEABLE, Ccx-'IPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION, THE VALUE IS THAT REPORTED BY THE LABORATORY C CONFIRMED BY GC/MS
4-10
-- - -- - - - - - -- - - --l!!!!B!I -
TABLE 4-Jb
ANALYTICAL DATA SUM-1ARY AREA 2 SOILS, CONTINUED
FCX -STATESVILLE STATESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA
FS-205-FS-205-FS-206-FS-206-FS-208-FS-208-FS-208-FS-209-FS-209-
SLA SLB SLA SLB SLA SLB" SLC SLA SLB O" -6" 24""-36" 0"-6" 24 .. -36 ,. 0"-6" 24"-36" t.8"-60" O" -12" 12"-48"
06/06/91 06/06/91 06/06/91 06/06/91 06/05/91 06/05/91 06/0S/91 06/11/91 06/11/91
0900 0915 0800 1045 1710 1720 1730 0805 0850
INORGANIC ELEMENTS MG/KG MG/KG r-t:;/KG t-K;/KG M.3/KG l-(;/KG MG/KG t-,:;/KG MG/KG
ALUMINUM 20000J 19000J 17000J JBOOOJ 22000J 21.oOOOJ 21000J 21000J 26000J ANTIMONY 3.8UR 3. SUR ,uR 3.JUR 3.9UR 4. lUR 3.JUR 4.lUR
ARSENIC 2.7J 2. 7J 2. lJ 0.82UR !UR BARIUM 120 58 260 15 450 33 22 410 57 CALCIUM 3100 "100 9100 260 6900 3,0 140 4300 880 CHROMIUM IOOJ 5,J 57J 75J 58J 96J 120J 74J 74J COBALT 9.B 12 l 3 2.' 19 13 l. 8 19 5.6 COPPER 39 20 23 32 30 30 '6 IRON 58000 41000 33000 65000 37000 51000 61000 39000 42000 LEAD 22J ,9J l2J l 8J 7.2J 31J l6J 9. SJ 24J MAGNESIUM 3000 2100 7 t. 00 310 11000 ,50 220 10000 890 MANGANESE 260J t.60J 290J ISOJ 390J 760J 180J 260J 410J NICKEL 18 12 22 19 33 7. 3 7.1 4 l 11 POTASSIUM Jt.00 1100 7200 210 12000 570 330 11000 1000 SELENIUM 0.87UR 0.87UR 0.81UR 0.9lUR 0.8SUR 3.9UR 0.83UR 0.82UR lUR SODIUM 150 200 190 VANADIUM 130J 93J 7 5J l50J 8SJ 120J 140J 91J lOOJ zrnc 68 9' 63 ,2 1,0 Bl 29
PESTICIDE/PCB COMPOUNDS UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG LIG/KG lJG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG
t.. t.' -ODD CP.P'-DDDJ 1900C 2800C
t.. t.' -ODE (P.P'-DDE) 370C 830C l9J 25J t.,t.'-DDT (P,P'-DDT) 1900C 2700C 55 160 ALPHA-CHLORDANE /2 710JC 7 lOJC GNflA-CHLORDANE /2 890JC 880JC ENDRIN t.60C 2500C GAM1A-BHC (LINOANEJ ,0J
EXTRACTABLE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS LlG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG
BENZO(AlANTHRACENE 90J 70J BENZO(B AND/OR KJFLUORANTHENE JOOJ t.20J BENZO(GHI)PERYLENE 200J 230J BENZO-A-PYRENE Zt.OJ 250J
4-11
- - - - - - -- - - -
EXTRACTABLE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
BENZOPYRENE (NOT A)
CHRYSENE
FLUORANTHENE
INDENO (1,2,3-CD) PYRENE PYRENE I UNIDENTIFIED COMPOUND
PURGEABLE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
TETRACHLOROETHENE(TETRACHLOROETHYLENE)
TRICHLOROETHENE(TRICHLOROETHYLENE)
,·,,,fr FOOTNOTES fr**
NA NOT ANALYZED
J ESTIMATED VALUE
N PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED
TABLE 4-Jh
ANALYTICAL DATA SUr-MARY AREA 2 SOILS, CONTINUED FCX-STATESVILLE STATESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA
FS-205-FS-205-FS-206-FS-206-
SLA SLB SLA SLB o .. -6 .. 24"-36" 0 .. -5·· 24'"-36'"
06/06/91 06/06/91 06/06/91 06/06/91
0900 0915 0800 1045
UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG
600JN 900JN
I IOJ IZOJ 67J
lSOJ 170J
1 SOJ J70J
lOOOJ ZOOOJ
UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG
IJ JJ 6
-
FS-208-
SLA
0"-6"'
06/05/91
1710
UG/KG
UG/KG
JJ
6
U MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT HOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT R QUALITY CONTROL INDICATES THAT DATA ARE UNUSEABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY //OT BE PRESENT
-
FS-208-
SLB
Zli" -35·
06/05/91
1720
UG/KG
UG/KG
RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION, THE VALUE IS THAT REPORTED BY THE LABORATORY C CONFIRMED BY Ge/MS
4-12
- -
1!11!!1 ==
FS-208- FS-209-FS-209-
SLC SLA SLB
48"-60" 0"-12" 12" -4 8"
06/05/91 06/11/91 06/11/91
1730 0805 0850
UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG
UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG
2J
- - -- - - -- - - - -- - - -
1!!11!!1 1!11!!! 1!!1111
TABLE 4-3c
ANALYTICAL DATA SIJH-1ARY AREA 2 SOILS. CONTINUED FCX-STATESVILLE STATESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA
FS-210-FS-210-FS-210-FS-210-FS-211-FS-211- FS-212- FS-212-FS-212-FS-212-FS-212-
SLA SLB SLC SLD SLA SLB SLA SLB SLC SLD SL£ 0"-12"' 12"'-48"' 48"-84"" 96"-108" 0"-6" Zli" -36 .. 4 " -24 .. 60" -Bli" 120-141. .. 180-204" 240-264"
06/11/91 06/11/91 06/1 I/91 06/11/91 06/05/91 06/05/91 06/ 11/91 06/ 11/91 06/11/91 06/11/91 06/11/91 1000 1020 1210 1250 0730 0745 0840 0900 0925 1000 1030
INORGANIC ELEMENTS MG/KG M:i/KG r-K;/KG MG/KG MG/KG MG/KG MG/KG MG/KG M:;/KG MG/KG MG/KG
ALUMINUM 27000J 27000J 28000J 13000J 23000 25000 33000J 6100J 6500J 12000J l4000J ANTif-ONY 3.3UR 3.8UR ' !UR 4.lUR 3. SUR 3.9UR 3.9UR ARSENIC 2UR 0.88UR lUR 0.96UR 0.87UR 0.93UR BARIUM 2,0 99 29 " 350 22 ,o 6.8 " 90 CALCIUM 3000 3100 660 200 3100 650 930 CHROMIUM 63J 58J llOJ 58J 71J 63J 88J 3.lJ 55J 3<J COBALT 12 13 I. 6 6 16 3 .2 2.6 25 25 COPPER 35 31 32 3'J 29J " ,o 36 IRON 49000 55000 67000 lilOOO 40000 62000 62000 3300 1100 54000 32000 LEAD 17J 27J 29J 22J 140J 16J 28J 19J 22J 87J l<J MAGNESIUM 5800 3900 «o 260 8900 390 7D0 1300 3600 MANGANESE 250J 380J 130J 190J 370J ZOOJ 220J 12J 5'J 1600J 730J NICKEL 25 " ll 9 ' 35 7. 7 II 2.6 '5 29 POTASSIUM 6300 I.ZOO 6<0 310 9600 370 1000 ,20 250 1500 4200 SELENIUM 0.81UR 0.93UR 0. 91.UR 0.88UR 0.93UR 0.98UR 0,93UR 5UR 0.96UR 0.87UR 0.93UR VANADIUM 97J 130J 11.0J IOOJ l!O 220 92J 73J '7J ZINC 68 100 ,, 190J 33 ,a 61
PESTICIDE/PCB CCX-1POUNDS UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG
I.. I." -DOE {P.P' -DDE) ,2 4.1."-0DT CP.P"-ODT) 230 ALPHA-CHLORDANE /2 l400CJ e,J 300 GAH1A-CHLORDANE /2 1800CJ !IA 73J 260 HEPTACHLOR 430CJ 21J HEPTACHLOR EPOXIDE 22 -
EXTRACTABLE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG
2,1.-0INITROTOLUENE 790UR 8liOUR Z-METHYLNAPHTHALENE 680J BENZO(A)ANTHRACENE l IOJ BJS(Z-CHLOROETHYL) ETHER 780I BIS(2-ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE 11000
4-13
-·-- -- --- -- - - -
FS-210-
SLA
O'" -12"
06/11/91
1000
EXTRACTABLE ORGANIC CCX-'IPOUNDS UG/KG
CHRYSENE NAPHTHALENE PHENANTHRENE
PYRENE 1-METHYLNAPHTHALENE DIHETHYLNAPHTHALENE PETROLEUM PRODUCT 1 UNIDENTIFIED COMPOUND IOOOJ
18 UNIDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS
PURGEABLE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS UG/KG
TRICHLOROETHENE(TRICHLOROETHYLENF.)
"*""***************"**********************"*"*~****************'
t, ,, *FOOTNOTES·'*;,
NA NOT ANALYZED
J ESTIMATED VALUE
N PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED
TABLE 4-3c
ANALYTICAL DATA SutflARY
AREA 2 SOILS, CONTINUED FCX-STATESVILLE
STATESVILLE, NORTH CAROL I NA
FS-210-FS-210-FS-210-FS-211-SLB SLC SLD SLA 12 .. -t. 8 .. li8" -84" 96"-108" O" -5··
06/11/91 06/11/91 06/11/91 06/0S/91 1020 1210. 1250 0730
UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG
120J
993
120J
BJJ IOOOJN ZOOOJN
" IOOOJ
40000J
UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG
Z-1
U MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATlON LIMIT R QUALITY CONTROL INDICATES THAT DATA ARE UNUSEABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT
FS-211-
SLB
24"-36"
06/0S/91
0745
UG/KG
UG/KG
RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION. THE VALUE JS THAT REPORTED BY THE LABORATORY C CONFIRMED BY GC/MS
4-14
-- ---
FS-212-FS-212-FS-212- FS-212-rs-212-SLA SLB SLC SLD SLE 4 "-24 .. 60"-84" 120-144" 180-204" 240-264""
06/11/91 06/11/91 06/11/91 06/11/91 06/11 /91 0840 0900 0925 1000 1030
UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG
UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG
2J
- - - - -- -- -- - - - -- ---
TABLE t..-3d
ANALYTICAL DATA SUtflARY
AREA 2 SOILS, CONTINUED FCX-STATESVILLE
STATESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA
FS-213-FS-213-FS-214- FS-214-FS-Zlt.-FS-215-FS-215-FS-215-FS-216- FS-216-FS-216-
SLA SLB SLA SLB SLC SLA SLB SLC SLA SLB SLC ,· o·· -6" Zt. "-35· 0"-6"" zi.··-35·· Lo8""-60" 0"-6" 2t. "-36" 48"-60" 0 .. -6" 24"-36" 48"-60"'
06/11/91 06/11?91 06/11/91 06/11/91 06/11/91 06/10/91 06/10/91 06/10/91 06/11/91 06/11/91 06/11 /91
14 4 5 1 t. 50 120 5 1305 1320 lt.20 14 35 14 50 1500 1520 1530
INORGANIC ELEMENTS MG/KG MG/KG !'-(;/KG MG/KG MG/KG MG/KG MG/KG t-[;/KG t-,:;/KG /"G/KG MG/KG
ALUMINUM 21000J 18000 27000J IBOOOJ IZOOOJ 18000J 29000J lOOOOJ 23000J 21000J NA•·•
ANTIMONY 2.6UR 3.3UR 3. 4UR 3.'.'>UR 3.3UR 4. lUR 3.8UR 2.ZUR NA'' ARSENIC 0. 7 9UR 0.86UR 0,94UR 0.88UR NA'''
BARIUM 510 3, 2,0 " " 160 30 " ,go 22 NA•·,
BERYLLIUM 1. 2 NA•
CADMIUM 1. 6 1. 3 1. 6J NA"
CALCIUM 4800 1100 3100 310 3700 250 6200 ,go NA''
CHROMIUM 62J SJJ 5gJ IBOJ BlJ 5,J g,J 1,J g1J 130J NA'' COBALT 22 3.2 12 2. 1 11 g .2 3 22 2.3 NA'' COPPER " 3, •BJ 'B 26 55 56 ,a NA"
IRON 36000 33000 50000 65000 67000 34000 68000 15000 39000 83000 NA•~
LEAD !OJ 1'J !BJ 21J •OJ 65J 30J !BJ 17J 20J NA•',
MAGNESIUM 12000 550 6500 220 87 4200 '20 210 13000 '70 NA" MANGANESE 290J g2J 240J l90J 500J 280J 150J •OJ 2t.OJ 170J NA,.,
MERCURY NA'' NICKEL ,5 7 . B ze 10 21 20 10 2. 8 61 13 NA"
POTASSIUM 13000 670 7000 280 730 l.400 580 '20 13000 560 NA" SELENIUM 0.76UR 0.95UR 0. 78UR O. 79UR 0.86UR 0.BOUR 0.94UR 4. 4UR O.BZUR 0.94UR NA" SILVER NA" SODIUM 220 160 2,0 NA•'
THALLIUM NA'' VANADIUM goJ gq IOOJ J IOJ 7 lJ 7 l J llOJ 23J g5J 250J NA•' ZINC 130 " 66 33 " 82 36 1, a 68 NA"
PESTICIDE/PCB Ca-1POUNDS UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UGI-KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG
4.4'-DDD (P,P'-DDD) 160 17J
io,4'-DDE (P,P'-DDEJ 37
4, 4' -DDT CP,P'-DDTJ ,g ,a 57 ALPHA-CHLORDANE /2 36J 16J BETA-BHC l 5J GN't1A-CHLORDANE /2 3gJ
EXTRACTABLE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG
BIS{2-ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE 4900 PYRENE 5gJ
PURGEABLE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG ·
TRICHLOROETHENE{TRICHLOROETHYLENE) 3J 6
........................................................................
"'"'*FOOTNOTES"'**
NA NOT ANALYZED NA• NOT ANALYZED, SAMPLE NOT RECEIVED BY INORGANIC LABORATORY
J ESTIMATED VALUE
MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED
4-15
-- - - - - - - -- - --- --l!!!l!I! ,!!!!I
U MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT
R QUALITY CONTROL INDICATES THAT DATA ARE UNUSEABLE, COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT
RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION. THE VALUE IS THAT REPORTED BY THE LABORATORY
4-16
-- - ----- - - - - - - - --
TABLE 4-3e
ANALYTICAL DATA SUr-t1ARY
AREA 2 SOILS, CONTINUED FCX-STATESVILLE STATESVILLE, NORTH CAROL I NA
FS-217-FS-217-FS-218-FS-218-FS-219-FS-219- FS-220-FS-220- FS-221-rs-221-
SLA SLB SLA SLB SLA SLB SLA SLB SLA SLB o··-5·· 24""-36"' o·· -s .. 24 "" -36" O"' -6" 2t. .. -30 .. 0"-6" J0"-36" 0"-6" 24""-36"
06/11/91 06/11/91 06/10/91 06/10/91 06/19/91 06/19/91 06/19/91 06/19/91 06/11/91 06/11 /9 I l 34 5 Jl,QQ 1415 1400 1050 1105 0900 091 '.> 1705 1720
INORGANIC ELEMENTS MG/KG M::;/KG M3/KG MG/KG MG/KG MG/KG M3/KG M:J/KG t-X;/KG M:;/KG
ALUMINUM 22000J l 60D OJ 22000J 11000.l 21000 27000 29000 21000 39000J 12000J ANTIMONY 2. JUR 3.8UR 2.6UR 2.5UR 2. 7UR ARSENIC 0 46UR 0.89UR O. li5UR BARIUM l 60 12 310 18 83 69 120 30 68 6.6 BERYLLIUM 2. 1 CADMIUM 1. 2 CALCIUM 1600 380 3600 1100 zi.oo 1800 970 1700 290 CHROMIUM 'SJ SSJ SSJ 6'J 42J L.8J 170J 69J 52J '7J COBALT 9. 7 3 15 l' 19 2, '. 7 5. 1 COPPER 29 J~ 37 39 28 ,o 33 38 " IRON 32000 62000 4 7000 72000 44000 49000 67000 55000 50000 70000 LEAD 16J 35J !OJ '3J 17 18 22 25 30J 19J MAGNESIUM 4 500 2~0 8600 1'0 2800 2200 5000 950 1500 220 MANGANESE 160J lOOJ 260 780J 280J 260J SOOJ 180J 150J 130J NICKEL 23 l 3 32 l3 12 10 26 16 7.1 POTASSIUM 4800 520 9100 lSO 3300 2700 5700 1400 1800 1100 SELENIUM l. 5J 0 93UR 0 79UR 0.8£lUR 0.89UR 0.95UR 0.87UR 0.94UR 0. 97UR 0. 90UR SODIUM 300 VANADIUM 63-1 91J 89J 91J 96J lOOJ 150J 100J 88J llOJ ZINC 59 ~o " 58 59 91 89 5, 37
EXTRACTABLE ORGANIC Ccx-1POUNDS UG/KG UG/KG UG!i<G UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG
CHRYSENE 76J HEXADECANOIC ACID 3000JN OCTADECANOIC ACID 700JN OCTAHYDRODIMETHYL(METHYLETHYL)PHENANTHRENE
CARBOXYLIC ACID lOOOJN OCTAHYDRODIMETHYL(METHYLETHYL)PHENANTHRENE CARBOXYLIC ACID. METHYLESTF.:R SOOJN
PURGEA~LE ORGANIC Ccx--lPOUNDS UG/KG UG/l:G UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG
TRICHLOROETHENE(TRICHLOROETHYLENEJ 2J PINENE (2 ISCl-lERS J 60JN
~**********••····••*••*************••···························
*'•*FOOTNOTES•\**
NA NOT ANALYZED
J ESTIMATED VALUE
N PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED u MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MillIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT R QUALITY CONTROL INDICATES THAT DATA ARE UNUSEABLE, COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION, THE VALUE IS THAT REPORTED BY THE LABORATORY
4-17
---- - --- ---- - ---- --
TABLE 4-3[ ANALYTICAL DATA SillflARY
AREA 2 SOILS, CONTINUED FCX-STATESVILLE STATESVILLE, NORTH CAROLI NA
FS-222-FS-222-FS-222-FS-222-FS-223-FS-223-FS-224-Fs-zzi.-fS-224-FS-225-FS-225-FS-225-
SLA SLB SLC SLD IS SLA SLB SLA SLB SLC SLA SLB SLC o·· -6" Zt. .. -36" 1,5··-50·· DUPE/SLC o·· -5·· 21. ·· -35·· o··-5 .. 24 .. ·36" 48"-60" 0"'-6" 24" -36" 48"-60"
06/05/91 06/05/91 06/05/91 06/05/91 06/05/91 06/05/91 06/05/91 06/05/91 06/05/91 06/05/91 06/05/91 06/05/91 0740 07 50 0805 0810 1350 1i.oo 1530 154 5 1555 1525 1535 1550
INORGANIC ELEMENTS MG/KG MG/KG MG/KG MG/KG MG/KG MG/KG M:;/KG MG/KG MG/KG MG/KG MG/KG r-,(;/KG
ALUMINUM 17000 ll.000 6600 6t.OO 17000 23000 12000 29000 34000 22000 35000 6100 ANTlf-K)NY J.9UR 3. 6UR 3 'IJR 3JR
ARSENIC 4.JJ 5. JJR
BARIUM 'IO 17 29 29 260 32 ,1 11 25 5, 13 12
BERYLLIUM
CADMIUM
CALCIUM 4100 280 3000 '10 170000 3800 590 36000 910
CHROMIUM ,sJ 20J JZJ 3J 58J '5J 39J 85J 96J 87J 260J ,5J COBALT 19 18 16 56 COPPER 38J ,1J 27J 160J 33J 3U 36 26J IRON 31000 4 5000 )4000 55000 32000 58000 23000 76000 77000 46000 64000 20000 LEAD 6J !BJ 7,liJ l7J 13J 32J llOJ 12J 8.9J 100 17J 7. 6J MAGNESIUM 9900 210 180 220 51,00 900 3200 250 190 5300 360 310 MANGANESE 320J 190J l..70J 600J 230J 250J 130J 360J 1200J 270J 240J 86J MERCURY
NICKEL 35 5.5 ' ' 5.5 33 7 . 8 e 32 69 19 31 1, POTASSIUM 12000 270 260 320 7 500 1100 390 660 210 290 SELENIUM 0.79UR 0.89UR I . 7 J 0.66UR 0. 70UR 0. 74UR 0.83UR 0. 78UR 0.81UR l. lUR 0. 76UR 0. 71UR SILVER
SODIUM !80 THALLIUM
VANADIUM 68 52 " ,3 58 110 56 170 190 IOOJ 1,0 62 ZINC 93J 61J Jt.OJ 65J 97J 160 60J
PESTICIDE/PCB CCX'-JPOUNDS UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG llG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG
4,t..'~DDD (F,P'-DDD) 26 '70 2400C 51 4. 4' -ODE (P.P'-DDE) 1800C , 1J 5'0 4,4'-DDT (P,P'-DDTl 95 4 . 4J l IOOC 7300C 130 ALPHA-CHLORDANE /2 220 GAM-lA.-CHLORDANE /2 170
4-18
-- - ---·-
FS-222-
SLA o·· -6"
06/05/91 07G0
·:XTRACTABLE ORGANIC CCl-'lPOUNDS UG/KG
2,t.-OINITROTOLUENE 680UR
ACENAPHTHYLENE
ANTHRACENE
BENZO(A)ANTHRACENE
BENW(B AND/OR K)FLUORANTHENE
BENW(GHI)PERYLENE
BENW-A-PYRENE
CHRYSENE
FLUORANTHENE
INDENO (1,2,3-CDl PYRENE
PHENANTHRENE
PYRENE
l UNIDENTIFIED Ca-lPOUND
3 UNIDENTIFIED Ca-lPOUNDS
BENWFLUORANTHENE CNOT B OR Kl
BENZOPYRENE (NOT A)
'lJRGEABLE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS UG/KG
TRICHLOROETHENE(TRICHLOROETHYLENEJ
t. UNIDENTIFIED Ca-lPOUNDS
*************************i ************************ .,,.,,..,·,,•,,. .. ,,
"'*FOOTNOTES•>,·,,-,
NA NOT ANALYZED J ESTIMATED VALUE
N PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF :'RESENCE OF MATERIAL MATERIAL WAS ANALYlF.D FOR BUT NOT DETECTED
- - - -
TABLE 4-3f
ANALYTICAL DATA SUfflARY
AREA 2 SOILS, CONTINUED FCX-STATESVILLE
STATESVILLE. NORTH CAROLINA
FS-222-FS-222-FS-222-FS-223-
SLB SLC SLD IS SLA
24"-36" 48"-60" DUPE/SLC 0 .. -6"
06/05/91 06/05/91 06/05/91 06/0':>/91 0750 0805 0810 l 3':>0
UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG
780UR 760UR 760UR 7G0UR
t.OOJ
1'0 J
160 J
Jt.0 J
lOOOJ
UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG!KG
2000J
U MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR RUT NOT DETECTED TllF. NUMBER JS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT
R QUALITY CONTROL INDICATES THAT DATA ARE UNUSEABLE, COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT UE PRESENT
-
FS-223-
SLB
24"-36'"
06/05/91
l t.OO
UG/KG
830UR
!JG/KG
3 J 400J
RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION. THE VALUE IS THAT REPORTED BY THE LABORATORY C CONFIRMED BY GC/MS
4-19
- - - - - - -
rs-221,-FS-224-FS-224-FS-225-FS-225-FS-225-
SLA SLB SLC SLA SLB SLC o··-5 .. 24"-36" 48"-60 .. O" -6" 2'•··-35·· t.8" -60"
06/05/91 06/05/91 06/05/91 06/05/91 06/05/91 06/05/91 1530 l St. 5 1555 1525 153 5 1550
UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG
900UR 880UR 9lOUR 770UR 890UR 7 BOUR ·
330 J
250 J
630 J 530 J
1300 1800
920 5t.0 J
860 J 6t.O J
1300 680 J
2100 s,o 790 J 660 J
340 J l 50 J lt.00 860
6000J
600JN 300JN
LTG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG
-- - ------- - - - - - -- - -
TABLE 4-3g
ANALYTICAL DATA S1..IT'-t1ARY
AREA 2 SOILS, CONTINUED FCX-STATESVJLLE
STATESVILLE. NORTH CAROLI NA
FS-226-FS-226-FS-226- FS-228-FS-228-FS-229- FS-229- FS-229-FS-229-FS-229-FS-230-FS-230-SLA SLB SLC SLA SLB SLA SLB SLC SLD SLE SLA SLB O" -12·· 24" -35·· t.8"-60" 0"-6 .. 24 .. -36'" O" -z4·· 60"-84'' 120-144" 180-ZOli" 240-264'' 0"-6" 24""-36"
06/05/91 06/05/91 06/05/91 06/05/91 06/05/91 06/18/91 06/18/91 06/18/91 06/18/91 06/18/91 06/05/91 06/05/91 1600 1635 16t. 5 0935 09t.5 0920 0948 1010 103 S 1055 0910 0920
:ioRGAN IC ELEMENTS t-X;/KG MG/KG MG/KG MG/KG MG/KG MG/KG MG/KG M:;/KG M:;/KG MG/KG MG/KG MG/KG
ALUMINUM 17000J 18000J 9700J 15000 9100 15000 8200 9500 9800 6900 L.600 17000
ANTIMONY 3. 6UR 3. 6UR 4.SUR 3 SUR 4UR 3. 7UR 3. SUR 3.4UR i.. JUR ARSENIC BJ 4 lJ 1 OJ 0.92UR 0.90UR 0.98UR 0.92UR 2.SJ
BARIUM 90 28 12 200 38 19 21 43 26 62 31 CADMIUM 1. 3J 1J CALCIUM 53000 5200 290 4000 880 17000 300 CHROMIUM 62J 82J 79J 47J 6.3J l30J 130J 40J 39J 36J 13J 35J COBALT 7. 1 3.8 2. 7 12 11 14 35 16 COPPER 53 35 59 93J 30 IRON 36000 47000 62000 35000 7400 61000 47000 33000 46000 39000 12000 41000 LEAD l 70J 51J J]J 120J 74J 26 74 24 31 39 72J 1 BJ MAGNESIUM 5400 1600 330 3300 56 290 98 370 1600 240 MANGANESE 390J t.50J I IOJ 150J 66J 210J 870J St.OJ 1300J 770J It.OJ 70J MERCURY 5. 7JN 1. 5 0. 56J 0.44J NICKEL 18 11 33 20 9.2 15 11 21 9.4 8. 1 3.2 POTASSIUM lt.00 370 130 3200 280 580 290 320 1400 630 SELENIUM t..4UR O. 91UR 0.93UR 0 81UR 0.67UR 0. 95UR O. 92UR 4. SUR 0.98UR 0.92UR 0.58UR 0.75UR VANADIUM 88J 160J 260J 63 15 It.OJ llOJ 70J llOJ 63J 16 66 ZINC 500 230 46 370J 42 3900J .
::STICIDE/PCB COMPOUNDS UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG
4.t..·-ooo CP,P'-DDDJ 1300 9900CJ t..500 4.4'-DDE (P,P'-DDEJ 580 t., 4' · DDT (P.P'-DDTJ 21000CJ 83000CJ 47J 3800J 19 BETA-BHC 2700CJ DIELDRIN l4000CJ 40000CJ 35J 120 ENDRI!l 180J
<TRACTABLE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/»:i UG/KG UG/KG
2,4-DINITROTOLUENE 920UR 780UR 700UR 830UR 2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE St.0 J
ACENAPHTHYLENE 2200J 1200J ANTHRACENE 1700 930
4-20
-- - -- ----- - - --- - - --
TABLE 4-Jg
ANALYTICAL DATA SUJ-t1ARY AREA 2 SOILS, CONTINUED
F'CX-STATESVILLE STATESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA
FS-226-FS-226- FS-226- FS-228-FS-228-FS-229-FS-229- FS-229-FS-229-FS-229-FS-230-FS-230-SLA SLB SLC SLA SLB SLA SLB SLC SLD SLE SLA SLB O" -12" 24"-36"' 48 .. ·60'" 0"-6" 24"-36 .. o··-24 .. 60"-84" 120-llit.·· 180-204" 240-264" 0"-6" 24 '' -36"
06/05/91 06/05/91 06/05/91 06/05/91 06/05/91 06/18/91 06/18/91 06/18/91 06/18/91 06/18/91 06/05/91 06/05/91 1600 1635 1645 0935 09li5 0920 0948 1010 1035 1055 0910 0920
EXTRACTABLE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG
BENZO{A)ANTHRACENE 280J 87J 3300 920 BENZO(B AND/OR K)FLUORANTHENE 850J 210J 2800 2700 BENZO(GHJ)PERYLENE I90J 3500 2300 BENZO-A-PYRENE 330J 91J 5600 2600 CHRYSENE 360J llOJ t.000 lt.00 DI-N-BUTYLPHTHALATE 75J 83J 920 DI-N-CX::TYLPHTHALATE 1200 DIBENZO(A,H)ANTHRACENE lt.00 FLUORANTHENE 550J l90J 3t.00 920 INDENO (1,2,3-CDJ PYRENE 180J 3800 2100 PHENANTHRENE 180J 1 lOJ 530 J PYRENE t.30J 160J 3t.00 BENZANTHRACENONE 2000JN BENZOFLUORANTHENE (NOT B OR K> (2 ISCMERS) 5000JN BENZOFLUORANTHENE (NOT B OR K) ( 3 ISCMERS l 9000JN BENZOFLUORENE (2 ISOMERS) ZOOOJN BENZOPYRENE (NOT A) 900JN METHYLCHRYSENE IOOOJN METHYLFYRENE (2 ISCX'-fERSJ ZOOOJN PETROLEUM PRODUCT N PHENYLFLUORENE 500JN 1 UNIDENTIFIED COMPOUND 2000"1
3 UNIDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS 3000J 10 UNIDENTIFIED Ca-1POUNOS ZOOOOJ 12 UNIDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS lOOOOJ
PURGEABLE ORGANIC Ca-lPOUNDS UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UGtKG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG
1,2-DICHLOROETHENE (TOTAL) 4J TETRACHLOROETHENECTETRACHLOROETHYLENE) JJ l5 --' TRICHLOROETHENE(TRICHLOROETHYLENE) 21 JJ
................................................................
''•,-,FOOTNOTES•,·,*
NA NOT ANALYZED
J ESTIMATED VALUE
N PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED u. MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT
R QUALITY CONTROL INDICATES THAT DATA ARE UNUSEABLE, COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT ,. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION, THE VALUE IS TrlAT REPORTED BY THE LABORATORY C CONFIRMED BY GC/MS
4-2;1.
-- -- -- - - --- - - - - - - - -
TABLE 1.-Jh
ANALYTICAL DATA SUM'!ARY AREA 2 SOILS, CONTINUED
FCX·STATESVILLE STATESVILLE. NORTH CAROLINA
FS-231-FS-231-FS-232-FS-232-FS-233-FS-233-FS-233-FS-2Jt.,-FS-234-FS-235-FS-235-
SLA SLB SLA SLB SLA SLC, DUP SLB SLA SLB SLA SLB 0 .. - 6 .. 24" -36" 0"-6" Zli"-36" O" •6" OF SLA 2t. ... 35·· 0"-36'' Zt."•36" 0"-6" zt, ··-35"
06/05/91 06/05/91 06/05/91 06/05/91 06/05/91 06/05/91 06/05/91 06/05/91 06/05/91 06/05/91 06/05/91
1355 1405 1335 131., 5 1330 1335 1340 1300 1310 1020 1030
INORGANIC ELEMENTS MG/KG MG/KG MG/KG MG/KG r-x:;/KG r-K,/KG t-,:;/KG r£/KG MG/KG MG/KG MG/KG
ALUMINUM 18000 22000 13000 28000 13000 16000 36000 13000 8500 16000 7J.00
ANTIMONY 2.SUR 2. SUR 2. 9UR 3. SUR 3. 7UR 3.4UR 3. 6UR 3. ZUR
ARSENIC 3J 2. 7J Jlj S.JJ
BARIUM 410 62 310 46 380 450 60 57 44 97 10
CALCIUM 3 700 650 3200 920 2800 3600 1100 870 440 2400 400
CHRCt1IUM 46J 42J 42J 130J 38J SJJ l lOJ 52J 66J 42J 20J
COBALT 17 14 26 15 18
COPPER 31J 26J 42J 35J 38J
IRON 30000 56000 25000 65000 24000 29000 68000 25000 17000 37000 33000 ·LEAD 8.7-1 16J I SJ 12J 4. 8J 4.3J !9J 79J !9J 43J 19J
MAGNESIUM 9200 1100 7500 910 7300 9400 1000 1200 270 2800 100
MANGANESE 260J 210J 190J 430J 190 260J 280J 220J 170J 180J 81J
MERCURY 0. 4 lJ 0.53J NICKEL 29 7 3 29 30 28 34 18 9.3 5. I 15 3 POTASSIUM l 1000 }l.00 8200 1100 8900 11000 1200 840 280 1800
SELENIUM 0.6JUR 0 67UR 0 62UR 0.75UR O. 59UR 0.51UR 0. 76UR 0.63UR 0.65UR 0.64UR 0.57UR
VANADIUM 65 100 67 150 52 68 140 53 33 68 54
ZINC 97-1 260J 6!J 200J 220J 67J 180J 68J lOOJ
PESTICIDE/PCB COMPOUNDS UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG
4.4'-DDD ( p. P' -DDD) 66
t..t.'-DDE (P. P'-DOE) 28
4,t.'-DDT (P. P'-DDT> 92 490 25 26 ALDRIN 38 ,.
DIELDRIN 89 23
ENDRIN llOJ
GAft1A-BHC ( LINDANE) 45
HEPTACHLOR 32
EXTRACTABLE ORGANIC Ca-1POUNDS UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG
2,4-DINITROTOLUENE 710UR 790UR 880UR 830UR 720UR 740UR 840UR 730UR 7t.OUR 8t.9UR 810UR
ACENAPHTHYLENE 190 J 560 J
ANTHRACENE 440 J
4-22
--- ---- -
EXTRACTABLE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
BENZO(A)ANTHRACENE
BENZO{ B AND/OR K>FLUORANTHENE
BENZO(GHI)PERYLENE
BENZO-A-PYRENE
CHRYSENE FLUORANTHENE
INOENO (1,2,3-CD) PYRENE
PHENANTHRENE PYRENE BENZOFLUORANTHENE (NOT B DR Kl BENZOFLUORANTHENE (NOT B OR KJ (2 ISOMERS)
BENZOPYRENE (NOT A) PETROLEUM PRODUCT 1 UNIDENTIFIED CFOMPOUND 1 UNIDENTIFIED COMPOUND
4 UNIDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS 11 UNIDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS 12 UNIDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS
PURGEABLE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
TETRACHLOROETHENE(TETRACHLOROETHYLENEJ
TRICHLOROETHENE CTR ICtll.OROf.TllYLF.Nf. l
ETHYLMETHYLCYCLOHEXANE
TRIMETHYLCYCLOHEXANE 6 UNIDENTIFIED C01P0Uf/DS
,.,,.,,..FOOTNOTES""*
NA f/OT ANALYZED
J ESTIMATED VALUE
N PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED
FS-231-
SLA O" -6"
06/05/91
1355
UG/KG
230 J
llOOOJ
440 J
SOD J
300 J
280 J
400 J
240 J
900JN
UG/KG
--- -
TABLE 4-Jh
ANALYTICAL DATA SU?flARY AREA 2 SOILS. CONTINUED FCX-STATESVILLE
STATESVILLE, NORTH CAROL I NA
FS-231-FS-232-FS-232- FS-233-
SLB SLA SLB SLA
2li" -36" 0"-6" Zli"-36" o·· -5··
06/05/91 06/05/91 06/05/91 06/05/91
1405 1335 1345 1330
UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG
280J
260 J
190 J
2000JN
700JN
N
1000]
JOOJ
4000J
20000J
UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG
2 .J
U MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT
R QUALITY CONTROL INDICATES THAT DATA ARE UNUSEABLE. COMPOUflD MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT
-
FS-233-
SLC, DUP
OF SLA
06/05/91
1335
UG/KG
730J
380 J
290 J 170 J
200 J 400JN
lOOOJ
UG/KG
RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION. THE VALUE IS THAT REPORTED BY THE LABORATORY
4-23
- --- - -
FS-233-FS-234-FS-234-FS-235- FS-235-
SLB SLA SLB SLA SLB z4··-35·· 0"-36" 24"-36" 0''-6" 2G"-J6"
06/05/91 06/05/91 06/05/91 06/05/91 06/05/91
1340 1300 1310 1020 1030
UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG
600 J 260 J
780J 1500 540J
460 J 910
390 J 990
llOO
250 J 1300
420 J 8BO 330 J 460 J
1100
600JN
N
2000J 2000J
lOOOOJ
UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG
12 2 J
80JN 60JN 700J
- ------ - -------- - --
TABLE 4-Ji
ANALYTICAL DATA SUM'1ARY
AREA 2 SOJLS, CONTINUED
FCX-STATESVJLLE
STATESVILLE. NORTH CAROLINA
FS-236-FS-236-FS-236-FS-237-FS-237-FS-237-FS-238: FS-238-FS-239-
SLA SLC, DUP SLB SLA SLC, DUP SLB SLA SLB SLA o··-5 .. OF SLA 24"-36" 0"'-6 .. OF SLA 24 .. _ 36" o .. -6 .. 24"-36" 0"-6"
06/05/91 06/05/91 06/05/91 06/05/91 06/05/91 06/05/91 06/05/91 06/05/91 06/06/91
104 5 1050 1055 0825 0830 0835 0845 0855 0950
INORGANIC ELEMENTS MG/KG t13/KG MG/KG MG/KG MG/KG ~/KG MG/KG r-,:;/KG r-x;/KG
ALUMINUM 15000 13000 29000 13000 12000 24000 20000 16000 26000J
ANTIMONY 3. 7UR 3 .6UR 4. lUR 3.BUR 3. 7UR 4. !UR 3. SUR 3. 7UR
ARSENIC 3J 2.ZJ 2. SJ 2. SJ
BARIUM 24 23 37 56 61 22 60 12 32
CALCIUM 860 590 650 1500 1500 660 1100 2900
CHRCX-HUM 3 lJ 4lJ 38J 43J 36J 65J 83J llOJ 72J
COBALT 3.5
COPPER 3]J 31
IRON 38000 36000J 39000 3)000 30000 62000 41000 62000 58000
LEAD 28J 21J JBJ 99J 98J 24J 24J 24J JBJ
MAGNESIUM 370 320 270 1200 1200 350 1000 230 1000
MANGANESE 1 lOJ 120J 84J 200J 240J 160J 210J 160 190J
MERCURY 0.3SJ 0 33J 0.32J
NICKEL 3. 7 3. 7 4 7. I 7. 9 7. 9 8. 4 14 13 POTASSIUM 590 '.130 390 1100 1100 390 1200 660
SELENIUM 0.62UP. Q 61UR 0 73UR 0. 70UR 0.6SUR 0 70UR 0.61UR 0. 70UR IJ.81UR
SODIUM 160 VANADIUM 66 66 68 84 79 130 96 190 lSOJ
ZINC 33J llOJ 9,J 30J 35J 45
PEST IC IDE/PCB CCX'1POUNDS UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG llG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG
4. 4' -ODE CP,P'-DDE) 19
1...1.'-0DT (P.P'-DDT) 27 29 22J
EXTRACTABLE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS UG/KG llG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG
2.t.-D!NITROTOLUENE 7 SOUR 750lJR 8201JR 7 SOUR 780UR 840UR 7SOUR 8t.OUR
ACENAPHTHYLENE 180J
ANTHRACENE 85J
BENZO(A)ANTHRACENE 160J
BENZO{B AND/OR K)FLUORANTHENE 370J
BENZO(GHl)PERYLENE t.lOJ
BENZO-A-PYRENE 380J
B!S(2-ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE 5700
4-24
-- ---- - -- - -- -
EXTRACTABLE ORGANIC Ca-"!POUNDS
CHRYSENE OIBENZO(A,HJANTHRACENE
FLUORANTHENE INDENO (1,2,3-CD) PYRENE
PHENANTHRENE PYRENE
BENZOPYRENE (NOT Al
PERYLENE
PURGEABLE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
TRICHLOROETHENE(TRICHtOROETHYLENE)
"**FOOTNOTES"**
NA NOT ANALYZED J ESTIMATED VALUE
N PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED
TABLE 4-31
ANALYTICAL DATA SUtflARY
AREA 2 SOILS, CONTINUED FCX-STATESVILLE
STATESVILLE. NORTH CAROLINA
FS-236-FS-236-FS-236- FS-237-
SLA SLC. DUP SLB SLA 0··•6" OF SLA 24"·36" 0"-6"
06/05/91 06/05/91 06/05/91 06/05/91
1045 10'.">0 1055 0825
UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/K~
UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG
FS-237-
SLC. DUP
OF SLA
06/05/91
0830
UG/KG
UG/KG
U MATERIAL WAS ANALVZED fOR BUT NOT DETECTED THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT
R QUALITY CONTROL INDICATES THAT DATA ARE UNUSEABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT
FS-23 7-
SLB 21,··-35·
06/05/91
0835
UG/KG
UG/KG
RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION. THE VALUE JS THAT REPORTED BY THE LABORATORY
4-25
-
F'S-238-
SLA
0"-6"
06/05/91
0845
UG/KG
UG/KG
-
FS-238-
SLB z4··-35··
06/05/91
0855
UG/KG
UG/KG
-
FS-239-
SLA
0"-6"
06/06/91
0950
UG/KG
190J
120J
230J
290J
95J
420J
700JN
t.OOJN
UG/KG
2J
-- -
---- --- - -- ---- - - -- -
~
TABLE 4-Jj
ANALYTICAL DATA St.Jtt1ARY
AREA 2 SOILS, CONTINUED
FCX-STATESVILLE
STATESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA
FS-2'<0-FS-2t. 0-FS-2t.0-FS-240-FS-2t.0-FS-250-FS-250-FS-250-FS-250- FS-250-FS-250-
SLA SLB SLC SLD SLE SLA SLB SLC SLD SLE SLF o··-24 ·· 60"-8l,'' 120-14 t, .. 180-204" 240-264'" o··-12 .. 24"-30" 45··-54'" ao··-a5·· 158-164" 180-188"
06/12/91 06/ 12/91 06/12/91 06/ 12/91 06/ 12/91 09/ 12/91 09/12/91 09/12/91 09/12/91 09/ 12/91 09/12/91
0930 09'.':15 1020 1040 1110
INORGANIC ELEMENTS MG/KG M::;/KG tx;/KG f13/KG MG/KG 1-X,/KG r-t;/KG M3/KG MG/KG MG/KG MG/KG
ALUMINUM 21000J ]4000J l SOOOJ 12000J 13000J 24000 26000 18000 8li00 19000 Zt.000
ANTIMONY 2. 7UR 2. 9UR ARSENIC 0. 49UR 0.1.i8UR 0. 48UR 0. 52UR
BARIUM 43 80 I 50 69 230 98 22 13 6.3 76 18
BERYLLIUM 2 1.8 I.I I. 7 I. 5 1. 7 2.2
CADMIUM 1. 3 I. JJ I. 0 CALCIUM 400 2800 360 350 160 290
CHROMIUM 60J 62J 44J 33J · 4 7 J 280 740 130 120 100 1200 COBALT 4. 8 8.3 20 25 84 5.6 29
COPPER 22 37 64 66 67 51 32 14 54 53
IRON 63000 4 7 000 49000 52000 65000 44000 77000 46000 32000 67000 81000 LEAD 17J 1 7 J 17J 14J 2 lJ 97 22 23 33 20
MAGNESIUM 960 2200 3700 740 640 920 350 230 85 1900 330 MANGANESE 160J 270J 9JOJ 1 IOOJ J IO0J I 60 140 260 160 1800 l!O MERCURY I ' 0. 11 0.08 0.08 0.08
NICKEL 8 ) 7 16 20 53 17 11 14 100 lI POTASSIUM 990 Jt.00 5200 440 210 670 2100 SELENIUM 0.96UR 0.991JR 0.96UR 0.96UR lUR SODIUM NA NA NA NA NA 210
STRONTIUM NA NA tlA NA NA 54 3.8 3. I TELLURIUM NA NA NP. NA NA
THALLIUM 0.97
TIN NA NA NA NA NA 27
TITANIUM NA NA NA NA NA 540 400 270 340 990 340
VANADIUM 130J 72J 77J llOJ 200J SI 110 60 56 160 120 YTTRIUM NA NP.. NA NA NA 7 9 7. 5 4. 7 4. l 14 9.2 ZINC 27 4 I 65 41 61 140 59 38 18 71 61
EXTRACTABLE ORGANIC Cct1POUNDS UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG
BENZO(A)ANTHRACENE IZOOJ
BENZO(B AND/OR K)FLUORANTHENE 260DJ
BENZO(GHIJPERYLENE 570J
4-26
- ---- - --
EXTRACTABLE ORGANIC Ccx-lPOUNDS
BENZO-A-PYRENE
CHRYSENE FLUORANTHENE
INDENO (1,2,3-CD) PYRENE PYRENE BENZANTHRACENONE
BEflWFLUORANTHENE (NOT B OR Kl (lo ISOMERS) BENZOFLUORENE (2 ISOMERS) METHYLBENZANTHRACENE (2 ISOMERS) METHYLFLUORANTHENE
PURGEABLE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
ACETONE
''''"FOOTNOTES""''
NA NOT ANALYZED
J ESTIMATED VALUE
N PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED
FS-240-
SLA 0 .. -24"
06/12/91
0930
UG/KG
UG/KG
- - - -
TABLE t.-JJ
ANALYTICAL DATA SUM'1ARY
AREA 2 SOILS, CONTINUED
FCX-STATESVILLE STATESVILLE. NORTH CAROLINA
FS-2Lo0-FS-21.oo-FS-240-FS-Zt.0-
SLB SLC SLD SLE 60"-84 .. 120-14t. .. 180-Z0t." 240-264 ..
06/12/91 06/12/91 06/12/91 06/12/91
0955 1020 1040 1110
UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG
UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG'
U MATERIAL WAS ANALYlED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM Ql!AIHITATJON LIMIT
R QUALITY CONTROL INDICATES THAT DATA ARE UNUSEABLE, COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT
-
FS-250-
SLA o·· -12··
09/12/91
UG/KG
IIOOJ
1300J
1700J
680J
] 700J
t.QOJN 1.QQOJN
lO00JN
900JN
400JN
UG/KG
RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION, THE VALUE I;C: THAT REPORTED BY THE LABORATORY
4-27
-
FS-250-
SLB 24"-30"
09/12/91
UG/KG
UG/KG
-
FS-250-
SLC
48"-54"
09/12/91
UG/KG
UG/KG
-
FS-250-
SLD
80"-86""
09/12/91
UG/KG
UG/KG
490J
-
FS-250-
SLE
158-164"
09/12/91
UG/KG
UG/KG
-
FS-250-
SLP 180-188""
09/12/91
UG/KG
UG/KG
310J
-
--- --- - - - -- - - - ----~
TABLE 4-4a
ANALYTICAL DATA Sl.JPMARY AREA 3 SOILS
FCX-STATESVILLE
STATESVILLE. NORTH CAROLINA
FS-300-FS-300- FS-300-FS-301-FS-301-FS-302-FS-302-FS-303-FS-303-FS-304-FS-304-SLA SLB SLC SLA SLB SLA SLB SLA SLB SLA SLB I 8 .. -24 .. 30"-36"" Sli ·-60" 5li "-60 .. 76 .. -84" 42"-48" 72"-]8" 0"-6" 24"-30" 0"-6"' 24"-30'"
06/17/91 06/17/91 06/17/91 06/18/91 06/18/91 06/18/91 06/18/91 06/17 /91 06/17 /91 06/18/91 06/18/91 I 700 1707 1 7 l 5 1505 1510 1725 1720 1725 1730 1255 1258
INORGANIC ELEMENTS MG/KG r-K;/KG MG/KG MG/KG MG/KG MG/KG MG/KG M":;/KG ""3/KG MG/KG MG/KG
ALUMINUM 18000 15000 11000 19000 18000 1i.ooo 15000 17000 16000 16000 16000 ANTIMJNY 2. 7UR 2.SUR 2.SUR 4. !UR 4. lUR
ARSENIC 0. 97UR 0.85UR 0.81UR O. 97UR 0.97UR 0. 9t.UR
BARIUM 19 15 45 13 11 20 22 17 25 17 49 CALCIUM 190 240 540 6B0 770 7 30 CHROMIUM lOOJ 63J 34J 90J I90J 6IJ 72J 77J 6IJ 45J 38J COBALT 23 20 11 COPPER 69 41 37 20 31 31 34
IRON 86000 60000 38000 60000 65000 52000 56000 61000 53000 55000 4 5000 LEAD 18 16 20 16 23 20 24 17 18 19 27 MAGNESIUM 95 200 1300 200 180 290 590 320 260 300 1400
MANGANESE 770J 200J 260J 180J t. SOJ 2t.0J 200J 170J 160J ]80J 270J NICKEL 34 I 0 12 32 POTASSIUM 240 1900 310 740 280 330 2100 SELENIUM 0.97UR 0.85UR 4UR 0 %UR !UR 0.98UR 0.98UR 0.97UR 4. BUR 0.87UR 0. 941JR VANADIUM 250J 13 □~1 63J !OJ l40J 1203 120J 130J 120J BBJ 59J ZINC 72 36 58 34 30 32
PESTlCIDE/PCB COMPOUNDS UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG LJG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG
t.. i. '-ODD (P.P'-DDD) 160000( 790C 4,4'-DDT {P.P'-0DT) IZOOOC 1300(
EXTRACTABLE ORGANIC CCX'-lPOUNDS LlG/KG l_lG/r:G LIG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG
PENT ACHLOROPHENOL 910J 1 ISOMER OF ODD OR DDT 400J
6 ISOMERS OF ODD OR DDT loOOOOJ CHLOROPROPYLATE 3000JN
***************************••·······••**************************
"*'•FOOTNOTES**''
NA NOT ANALYZED
J ESTIMATED VALUE
" PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF' MATERIAL
MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED u MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT R QUALITY CONTROL INDICATES THAT DATA ARE UNUSEABLE, Ca-1POUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION, THE VALUE IS THAT REPORTED BY THE LABORATORY
C CONFIRMED BY GC/MS
4-28
---- ---- - -- - -- - - -- -
TABLE 4-4b
ANALYTICAL DATA SUM-1ARY
AREA 3 SOI LS , CONTINUED FCX-STATESVILLE STATESVILLE, NORTH CAROLI NA
FS-305-FS-305-FS-305-FS-306-FS-306-FS-306-FS-307-FS-308-FS-308-FS-309-FS-309-
SLA SLB SLC SLA SLB SLC SLA SLA SLB SLA SLB 0'"-6 .. z,;··-30·· t, 8" -54 .. 0" -42 · 54 .. -60 .. 7 8"' -Bt."' 0"-72" 0"-6" 24"-30'" 0"-6" 2£. "-36"
06/18/91 06/18/91 06/18/91 06/14/91 06/14 /91 06/11../91 06/18/91 06/17/91 06/17/91 06/lli/91 06/14/91
13 1 5 1320 1325 0935 0940 09t. 5 1650 1745 1800 0915 0916
INORGANIC ELEMENTS t-li/KG MG/KG MG/KG MG/KG 1-'l,/KG f',K;/KG r-x;/KG MG/KG r-x;/KG M:i/KG MG/KG
ALUMINUM 20000 22000 21000 25000 32000 28000 17000 23000 17000 13000 17000
ANTIMONY 4. JUR 2.7UR 3.8UR 4. lUR
ARSENIC 0.97UR O. 4 SUR 0.47UR 0.93UR 0.94UR
BARIUM 17 16 1, 22 16 20 23 22 29 16 75
BERYLLIUM 1.3
CALCIUM 1000 150 1300 160 510 ,so 2,0
CHROMIUM '7J '7J ,,gJ 7IJ 250J 400J 68J 7IJ 46J ,2J 3BJ
COBALT 61
COPPER ,5 ,, 59 67 29
IRON 53000 65000 65000 60000 86000 85000 49000 62000 53000 50000 51000
LEAD 19 19 18 19 19 25J 20 17 19 18 25
MAGNESIUM ,oo 350 360 3,0 330 170 ,oo 370 710 250 2400
MANGANESE 160J I 50J !60J 240J 170J 1000,l 270J 210J 190J 200J 520J
NICKEL 13 12 19 ,5 11
POTASSIUM '50 2,0 2,0 390 270 450 380 850 260 3500
SELENIUM O. 97UR 4. BUR 0.95UR 4. SUR !UR 0.94UR 0.93UR 0.93UR 0.94UR 0.95UR 0.9IUR
THALLIUM 0.33
VANADIUM 99J l IOJ 11 OJ 120J 200J 230J lOOJ 120J 89J 91J 75J
ZINC 28 3, 33 51 83 37 '1
PESTICIDE/PCB CCX'1POUNDS UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG
4 . 4' -ODD (P.P'-DDD) 5900C '3 19J 5400C
4.4·-DDE (P.P'-DDE) 4lOC
4.4'-DDT (P,P'-DDT) 1300C 19000C
GAM1A-CHLORDANE /2 5,J
EXTRACTABLE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG
PENTACHLOROPHENOL 270000
1 UNIDENTIFIED CctJJPOUND 900J
2 ISOMERS OF DOD OR DDT 9000J
CHLOROPROPYLATE 2000JN
OICHLOROBENZOPHENONE SOOJN
OCTACHLOROOIBENZODIOXIN 3000JN
TETRACHLOROPHENOL 6000JN
PURGEABLE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG
CHLOROFORM 2J
························································•*••····
•••FOOTNOT£SM••
NA NOT ANALYZED
J ESTIMATED VALUE N PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED u MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT
4-29
-
R
C
-- -- - - --·-- - -
QUALITY CONTROL INDICATES THAT DATA ARE UNUSEABLE, COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT
RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS iS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION, THE VALUE JS THAT REPORTED BY THE LABORATORY CONFIRMED BY GC/MS
4-30
- - - ---
- -- - - --- - - - - - - - --
TABLE 4-t.c
ANALYTICAL DATA SUM'1ARY
AREA 3 SOI LS . CONTINUED FCX-STATESVILLE
STATESVILLE. NORTH CAROLI NA
FS-310-FS-310-FS-311-FS-311-FS-Jll-FS-312-FS-312-FS-313-FS-313-· rs-311.o-FS-31li-SLA SLB SLA SLB SLC SLA SLB SLA SLB SLA SLB 0"'-6" 24"-30'" O" -6" 24"-30" 48"-54" 6"-12" 24"-30" 0"-6" 24"-30" 0"-6" Zio "-JO"
06/14/91 06/14/91 06/13/91 06/13/91 06/13/91 06/13/91 06/13/91 06/14/91 06/14/91 06/14/91 06/14/91 0850 0850 1625 1630 164 5 1530 1535 1015 1015 0945 0945
INORGANIC ELEMENTS MG/KG MG/KG MG/KG MG/KG MG/KG MG/KG MG/KG M3/KG M3/KG · MG/KG MG/KG
ALUMINUM 2"000 21000 22000 t..0000 42000 26000 29000 22000 11000 2 7000 18000 ANTIMJNY 4.lUR 3.9UR ARSENIC 0.50UR 0.94UR 0.96UR 0.90UR BARIUM 2, ,, 29 2' 25 37 23 17 13 26 5, CALCIUM 280 730 620 620 870 370 560 8800 CHROMIUM I !OJ 60J 60J l 70J 180J 7'J 83J 85J ,9J 57J 4 l~l COBALT 21 COPPER 3, 71 22 35 39 36 29 2B 35 IRON 60000 53000 54000 85000 85000 54000 69000 72000 50000 59000 54000 LEAD 17 13 17 1B 18 19 28 20 25 22 26 MAGNESIUM 320 290 ,20 ,30 ,rn 600 330 300 150 1100 2000 MANGANESE l 90J 130J 360J 210J 210J 390J 230J 200J 140J 230J 170J NICKEL 16 18 11 12 11 POTASSIUM 370 250 ,30 350 370 570 350 3 10 230 ,50 2800 SELENIUM 0.91UR 0.88UR 0.91UR t... 9UR 1. !UR 0.93UR !UR 0.92UR 0.94UR 4 .BUR 0.90UR VANADIUM I !OJ IOOJ 120J 160J 160J 130J 150J 160 BOJ 120J 9IJ ZINC 29 ,, ,3 '3 38 37J 33 31 38
PESTICIDE/PCB COMPOUNDS UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/1:G
4.t..'-DDD (P. P' -ODD) 1900C 6BOOC 970C 4,4'-DDT (P. P' -DDT) 1400( 110000( 1200C
EXTRACTABLE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG
BENZO{A)ANTHRACENE 940J BENZO(B AND/OR K)FLUORANTHENE 1600J BENZO-A-PYRENE 740J CHRYSENE 920J PENTACHLOROPHENOL 82000 7600 1 UNIDENTIFIED COMPOUND lOOOJ 30000J
*ftftftftftftftftftftftftftftftftftftftftftftftftftftftftftftftftftftftftftftftftftftftftftftftftftft66ftftftft6ftftftftftft
***FOOTNOTES<•*''
NA NOT ANALYZED
J ESTIMATED VALUE
MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED
U MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATiotl LIMIT
R QUALITY CONTROL INDICATES THAT DATA ARE UNUSEABLE, Ca-"!POUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION, THE VALUE IS THAT REPORTED BY THE LABORATORY C CONFIRMED BY GC/MS
4-31
-- - ------ - - - ---- - - -
TABLE 4-4d
ANALYTICAL DATA SUM-1.ARY
AREA 3 SOILS, CONTINUED FCX-STATESVILLE STATESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA
F'S-315-FS-315· FS-316-FS-316-FS-317-FS-317-FS-318-FS-318-F'S-319-FS-319-FS-320-FS-320-SLA SLB SLA SLB SLA SLB SLA SLB SLA . SLB SLA SLB 0"-6" 24'"-30 o··-5·· 21.i" -30" 0"-6" 24"-36"" O" -6" 12"-18" 0"-6" 12"'-16" 36"-42" 96"-108'" 06/13/91 06/13/91 06/13/91 06/13/91 06/13/91 06/13/91 06/13/91 06/13/91 06/ 13/91 06/13/91 06/12/91 06/12/91 1630 1635 1555 1600 1515 1520 1120 1125 1545 1550 1350 l'-20
INORGANIC ELEMENTS MG/KG r-x;/KG MG/KG MG/KG f-(;/KG MG/KG MG/KG MG/KG MG/KG t,,K;/KG M::i/KG M:;/KG
ALUMINUM 33000 26000 31000 38000 26000 32000 21000J 22000J 18000 21000 ZSOOOJ 16000J ANTl11JNY 3.9UR 2. 6UR 3.SUR 3.9UR 2. 4UR 2. 7UR ARSENIC 0.49UR O.SOUR O.SlUR 0.47UR 0.49UR BARIUM 19 12 32 ,, 25 20 30 35 30 '6 69 15 CADMIUM l. 5 CALCIUM 1400 ,30 570 600 1700 10000 1700 1100 760 CHROMIUM 200J 180J 60J 250J 80J 120J 70J 95J 53J 72J 51J 170J COBALT ,3 12 12 27 ,, " ' . 7 2.5 COPPER ,o 35 36 ,oo 41 27 25 41 38 IRON 78000 70000 61000 89000 53000 73000 53000 4 7000 43000 52000 38000 73000 LEAD 17 12 17 17 19 16 22J 22J 1B 21 llJ 20J MAGNESIUM 330 190 380 260 ,so 2B0 550 3700 560 '20 1700 1B0 MANGANESE l80J J40J 250J 200J 230J 240J 270J 300J 330J 560J 77J 150J MERCURY 0. 11 NICKEL 21 25 2' 9.8 15 12 2B 16 9.3 15 POTASSIUM 2'0 ,30 250 410 310 500 1200 510 ,so 2000 150 SELENIUM 0.99UR !UR O 93UR !UR O 88UR t.. 7UR 0.92UR 4. 6UR 0.94UR 0.93UR 0. 90UR O. 97UR THALL I UM 2 VANADIUM 180] 170J 120J 230J 120J 160J 120J llOJ lOOJ 130J 92J 220J ZINC 50 69 3,, 70 32 ,5 ,o 41 32 " ,2
PESTICIDE/PCB COMPOUNDS UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UC:/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG
t.. t.' -ODD C P. P' -ODO) 26000C l 6000C 31000C l4000C 26J 4. t.' -DDT (P. P' -DOT) 51 66 860C 'lJ 170000C 290C 33000[ 26000C 170000C 830000[ 120
EXTRACTABLE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG "UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG
2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE 160J ACENAPHTHENE lOOJ ACENAPHTHYLENE 1300 ANTHRACENE 1600 BENZO(A)ANTHRACENE 2700 BENZOCB AND/OR K)FLUORANTHENE 3100 BENZO(GHI)PERYLENE 1600 BENZO-A-PYRENE 2800 CHRYSENE 2800J DIBENZO(A, H )ANTHRACENE 540J FLUORANTHENE 5100 FLUORENE 530J INDENO (1,2,J-CD) PYRENE 1300 NAPHTHALENE 150J PENTACHLOROPHENOL 490J 17000 560J 2300J 12000 15000 420000 PHENANTHRENE 4800 PYRENE 6000
4-32
--- ------ --- - --- --
TABLE t.-4d ANALYTICAL DATA SUr+1A.RY
AREA 3 SOILS. CONTINUED FCX-STATESVILLE
STATESVILLE. NORTH CAROL I NA
FS-315-FS-315-FS-316-FS-316-FS-317-FS-31 7-FS-318- FS-318-FS-319- FS-319-FS-320-SLA SLB SLA SLB SLA SLB SLA SLB SLA SLB SLA 0" - 6 .. zt.··-30·· o··-5·· 24" -30' o··-5 .. zi. ·· -35·· 0" - 6 .. 12 .. - 1 s·· 0" -6" 12"-16" 36"-42"'
06/13/91 06/13/91 06/13/91 06/13/91 06/13/91 06/13/91 06/13/91 06/13/91 06/13/91 06/13/91 06/12/91 1630
EXTRACTABLE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS UG/KG
1 UNIDENTIFIED COMPOUND 11 UNIDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS 5 UNIDENTIFIED COOPOUNDS 6 UNIDENTIFIED Cel1POUNDS
BENZOPYRENE (NOT A) CYCLOPENTAPHENANTHRENE
METHYLANTHRACENE METHYLPHENANTHRENE (3 ISOMERS) PERYLENE PETROLEUM PRODUCT PHENYLNAPHTHALENE
PURGEABLE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS UG/KG
TRICHLOROETHENE(TRICHLOROETHYLENEJ
*******************************************"*************"*****'
***FOOTNOTES*"* NA NOT ANALYZED J ESTIMATED VALUE
N PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED
I 63 5 l 555 1600 151 5
UG/KG llG/KG UG/KG UG/KG
SOOOOJ
UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG
U MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT UETECTEO. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTlTATION LIMJT R QUALITY CONTROL INDICATES THAT DATA ARE UNUSEABLE, CCX'-1POUflD MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT
l 520
UG/KG
UG/KG
RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION. THE VALUE IS THAT REPORTED BY THE LABORATORY C CONFIRMED BY GC/MS
4-33
1120 1125 15G 5 1550 1350
UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG
ZOOOOOJ
30000J
20000J
SOOOOJ
ZOOOJN
2000JN
2000JN
7000JN
lOOOJN
II
IOOOJN
UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG
2J lJ
-
FS-320-
SLB
96"-108""
06/12/91
lli20
UG/KG
/
UG/KG
-- - - -- ---- - - --- -- --
TABLE 4-4e
ANALYTICAL DATA SUM'1ARY AREA 3 SOILS, CONTINUED FCX-STATESVILLE
STATESVILLE, NORTH CAROL I NA
FS-321-FS-321- FS-322- FS-322-FS-323-FS-323-FS-324-FS-321<-FS-324-SLA SLB SLA SLB SLA SLB SLA SLB SLC 12"'·72"' 72 .. -54·· 12'"-Zli" 24 .. • 35· 18 .. -24"' 36 .. ·48 .. 12"'-18" 36"-48" 60"-72"
06/12/91 06/12/91 06/ 12/91 06/12/91 06/ 12/91 06/12/91 06/12/91 06/12/91 06/12/91 1315 1335 1500 1510 1555 1600 1705 1715 1725
INORGANIC ELEMENTS M3/KG MG/KG MG/KG t-K;/KG MG/KG MG/KG r-x;/KG MG/KG MG/KG
ALUMINUM 28000J 40000J 27000J 28000J 29000J 26000J 32000J 29000J 29000J ANTir-ONY 2. SUR 2 6UR 2.BUR 2. 3UR 2 6UR ARSENIC 2.SJ 9.2J 3. lJ BARIUM 37 93 21 ,8 58 '8 2'0 25 220 CALCIUM 320 1900 1900 t.6000 810 5,0 1300 260 1300 CHRO"IIUM 57J 62J 86J 60J 75J 130J 65J llOJ 130J COBALT 3 6 5 2.6 6.9 5 2.9 21 2.6 22 COPPER 21 2, 35 36 30 IRON 39000 l.ot.000 t.t.000 36000 4 7000 t.6000 58000 76000 57000 LEAD 15J 15J l7J IIJ l8J 22J 1'J 20J 16J MAGNESIUM 620 1700 1000 22000 720 360 3300 300 3100 MANGANESE 14 OJ 180J 72J 260J 260J 230J 430J 220J 490J NICKEL 8. I 13 6. 7 15 9 7. 8 15 13 15 POTASSIUM 610 1900 '00 l.700 7'0 560 3300 300 3200 SELENIUM 0.91UR 0.85UR 0.92UR 0. 8 IUR 0 92UR 0.89UR 0.89UR 0.95UR 4. 6UR VANADIUM 97J 95J J 70J 7 4,1 IOOJ 9,J 160J 220J lSOJ ZINC 7.?, .31, JS " J7. 58 " 53
PESTICIDE/PCB COMPOUNDS UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG
4 . 4' -DOD (P. P'-DDDJ ,.u "· ]6J 1300C 4. i.' -ODE ( p. P' -ODE) 380C 4.4'-DDT 'r. P'-DDT) 1 on r,2oc }OOOOC IJJ f.LORIN 200
EXTRACTABLE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS UG/KG UG/KG IJG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG
ACENAPllTHYLENE 76J BENZO(B AND/OR KJFLUORANTHENE 390J BENZO(GHJ JPERYLf.NF. 170.1 !lEN7.0 A· l'YRJ-:NJ·: JZOJ 8 l S ( 2-ETllYLHEXYL) PllTIIALATE 12000 CHRYSENE ]70J FLUORANTHENE l l0J INDENO (1.2,3-CD) PYRENE JS0J PYRENE 4 90J 2 UNIDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS S000J BENZOPYRENE (NOT A) S00JN
4-34
-- - --- -- --- - -
PURGEABLE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
TRICHLOROETHENE(TRICHLOROETHYLENEJ
•'•**FOOTNOTES***
NA NOT ANALYZED J ESTIMATED VALUE
N PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED
TABLE 4-4e
ANALYTICAL DATA SUr-t1ARY
AREA 3 SOILS, CONTINUED
FCX-STATESVJLLE
STATESVILLE. NORTH CAROLINA
FS-321 · FS-321-FS-322-FS-322-
SLA SLB SLA SLB 12""-72' 72 .. -8t." 12"'-24"' 24"-36'"
06/ 12/91 06/ 12/91 06/12/91 06/ 12/91
1315 1335 1500 1510
/JG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG
2J
FS-323-
SLA 18" -24 ,.
06/12/91
1555
UG/KG
JJ
U MATERIAL WAS ANALYlED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MWIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT
R QUALITY CONTROL INDICATES THAT DATA ARE UNUSEABLE. CWPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT
FS-323-
SLB
36"-48"
06/12/91
1600
UG/KG
2J
RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION. THE VALUE IS THAT REPORTED BY THE LABORATORY
C CONFIRMED BY GC/MS
4-35
-- -- --
FS-32t.-FS-324-FS-324-
SLA SLB SLC 12" -18" 36"-48" 60"-72"
06/12/91 06/12/91 06/ 12/91
1705 1715 1725
UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG
-- - --- - - - - - - -------
TABLE li-4f
ANALYTICAL DATA SUr-m.RY
AREA 3 SOILS, CONTINUED FCX-STATESVILLE STATESVILLE, NORTH CAROLI NA
FS-325-FS-325-FS-325-rs-326-FS-326-FS-326-SLA SLB SLC SLA SLB SLC 0 .. -12 .. 12 .. -18 .. Zli .. -36 .. 24"-30"" 45··-52·· 55··_72 ..
06/13/91 06/13/91 06/13/91 06/18/91 06/18/91 06/18/91
1025 1030 1050 1822 1825 1830
INORGANIC ELEMENTS MG/KG MG/KG MG/KG MG/KG MG/KG MG/KG
ALUMINUM 3 7000J 3JOOOJ 37000J 15000 30000 17000 ANTIMONY 2.8UR ARSENIC 2. ]J 3. l J BARIUM 44 42 67 51 14 22 CALCIUM 5B0 610 2t.OO 680 1100 CHROMIUM 79J 64J 59J 82J 120J l IOJ COBALT 5. 4 3 4 . 6 16 COPPER 27 36 IRON 52000 53000 48000 53000 66000 93000 LEAD 16J l BJ 34J 22 20 31 MAGNESIUM 640 510 1300 390 310 600 MANGANESE 220J 180J I50J S60J 130J t.20J NICKEL 7. 8 9.5 7. 3 13 11 43 POTASSIUM 640 570 1100 510 390 320 SELENIUM 0. 9t,UR 0.88UR 0.91UR 0.88UR 0.97UR !UR VANADIUM 120J 120J 1 J0J 120J }40J 330J ZINC 29 39 35 31 52
PESTICIDE/PCB COMPOUNDS UG/KG UG/KG UGIKG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG
t.,t.'-DDD (P.P'-DDD) 430C 2800C 1700( JSOJC J20J 4,t.'-DDE C P. P' -ODE) 78 t.20C J60C 120J 4,t.'-DDT CP,P"-DDTJ 2500C S800C 3000C 3300( 830C 980C ALPHA-BHC 25J 130 ALPHA-CHLORDANE /2 l 00,! 20J BETA· BHC 61 DIELDRIN 62J 130J 210 GAM1A-BHC ( LINDANE) 31J GA.t-1'1A-CHLORDANE /2 96J 22J HEPTACHLOR 28J
EXTRACTABLE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS UG/KG LIG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG
2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE 2000 1800 3400 ACENAPHTHENE 340J ACENAPHTHYLENE 500J ANTHRACENE 700J BENZO(B AND/OR K)FLUORANTHENE 680J BENZO{GHI)PERYLENE JOOJ BENZO-A-PYRENE 570J FLUORANTHENE llOJ 1700
FLUORENE lt.00 NAPHTHALENE 1500 PHENANTHRENE 1300 670J 3500 PYRENE 91J 1700
4-36
---- -
EXTRACTABLE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
l ISOMER OF ODD OR DDT
J -METHYLNAPHTHALENE
ll UNIDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS
13 UNIDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS DIMETHYLNAPHTHALENE (2 ISCMERSJ DIMETHYLNAPHTHALENE (J ISOMERS)
DODECANE
DODECANE60
EICOSANE
HEPTADECANE HEXADECANE
NONADECANE
OCTADECANE
PENTADECANE
PETROLEUM PRODUCT
TETRADECANE
TRIDECANE
UNDECANE
PURGEABLE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
TRICHLOROETHENE(TRICHLOROETHYLENEJ
TETRAHYDROFURAN
- -- -
TABLE 4-4f ANALYTICAL DATA SUr+tARY
AREA 3 SOILS, CONTINUED FCX-STATESVILLE
STATESVILLE, NORTH CAROLI NA
FS-325-FS-32'.:i-
SLA SLB O"-12"' 12"'-18"'
06/13/91 06/13/91
1025 1030
UG/KG UG/KG
200000~1
lOOOOOJ
6000JN
lOOOOJN
9000JN
6000JN
4000JN
"I0000JN
IOOOOJN
8000JN
IOOOOJN
N fl
lOOOOJN IOOOOJN 7000JN t.OOOJN
UG/KG UG/KG
ZJ
,,nnnnnnnnnnnannannannnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn •,.•,t,,·,,·,,·,,·,,,,,,·,,·,n,·,
'''''•FOOTNOTES''''''
NA NOT ANALYZED J ESTIMATED VALUE
N PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED
-- -
FS-325-FS-326-FS-326-
SLC SLA SLB 24"-36" 2L. .. _30 .. 45··-52"
06/13/91 06/18/91 06/18/91
1050 1822 1825
UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG
BOOJ
3000JN
40000J
9000JN
£.QOOJN
7000Jfl
5000JN
7000JtJ
N
f>OOOJN
UG/KG UG/KG IJG/KG
lJ
U MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT
R QUALITY CONTROL INDICATES THAT DATA ARE UNUSEABLE, Ca-lPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT
-
FS-326-
SLC 55··-1r
06/18/91
1830
l!G/KG
UG/KG
JOJ!l
RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION. THE VALUE IS THAT REPORTED BY THE LABORATORY
C CONFIRMED BY GC/MS
4-37
- -- - --
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
same underlying geology. No organic results were reported for
the samples collected at this location.
Fifteen metals were detected in the three samples collected
at the background location. Excluding mercury, these metals were
among the most frequently detected metals in all samples
collected from the site as a whole, excluding titanium, yttrium,
strontium and tin, which were only analyzed for in a small number
of samples (see Table 4-1). Based on a purely empirical
comparison, the concentrations of metals detected at the
background location were either lower than the calculated mean
for the site or were only slightly higher. It is reasonable to
assume that the concentrations reported for the background
location are, in fact, probably representative of background
conditions.
4.1.2 Soils, Areas 1, 2 and 3
4.1.2.1 Metals
Eight of the metals detected in samples collected for the
investigation were detected in all (187 of 187) or nearly all
(183 of 187) of the soil samples collected. These metals are
aluminum, iron, manganese, chromium, lead, vanadium, barium, and
magnesium. Most of these, based on their widespread occurrence
and geological/mineralogical associations, are probably present
at naturally occurring concentrations at all or most of the
stations. A wide range in concentration was observed for some of
the metals, particularly aluminum and iron. These variations are
attributed to mineralogic and lithologic differences in the
hornblende gneiss and associated intrusives underlying the site.
Two metals, however, in the group of eight most frequently
detected metals, were evaluated to determine if they may have a
4-38
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
possible site relationship. These are lead and chromium, which
were detected in some samples at concentrations greater than an
order of magnitude higher than the mean concentration calculated
for all soil samples. These two metals are also the most
significant of the eight from a risk assessment point of view.
Lead was detected in 21 samples at concentrations greater than
the mean value for lead of 45.78 mg/kg. Figure 4-1 shows these
locations and concentrations. The station containing the highest
concentration-of lead, FS-118, is located behind a house in Area
1, near the southeastern corner of the FCX property. Other
locations where lead was detected at concentrations higher than
the mean were relatively scattered, except, perhaps, for sampling
stations located between the FCXS property and the Norfolk-
Southern rail line, where concentrations as high as 170 mg/kg
were detected.
Chromium was detected in 51 samples at concentrations
exceeding the mean concentration of 92.87 mg/kg. Figure 4-2
shows these locations and concentrations. Many of these
locations were at stations located beneath the warehouse floor,
west of the original horse shoe-shaped.structure and in an area
where a automotive shop was supposedly located. These values
could be due to natural geological variation or could possibly be
due to chromium.contamination associated with the shop operation.
Most of the values were not significantly above the mean. The
sample with the highest concentration, 1,200 mg/kg, was collected
at station FS-250-SLE at a depth of 15 feet below ground surface
between the rail siding and the east end of the warehouse.
The next group of metals -potassium, nickel, calcium, zinc,
copper and cobalt -were not as nearly widespread in their
occurrence, but were still detected in a significant number of
samples. They were detected in no more than 166 of the 187
stations sampled for the investigation. Of these, potassium,
calcium and zinc were the only metals detected at concentrations
4-39
I
-- - ---=\ (A) &7,1
-X -X l!l!~ X
X • x-
-2.1.1
(A)UJ
(8) 1tJ)(
)( -. -
-x
/
- - -- -
-x-
. " • lll2 "'" :,( • .J1.l ,.,., • Jli (A) ll ,.,,.
• "' I
:,( "'" • ~ (B) ,.
.(,t,) 11
(9) 18
\
SCALE
75 I D 37.5 ~---' (NFtIT)
• ~ !,j ::
Jill e I 1•
• .lJ.i
•
' .,
. •m ?:fi; .. ,., ~~ I----'-'---mE
• • • i! = ~' i:~ . " = .. ., • • i:r,:;, i:! ,,.,,.,
(B)UJ r:, •iB5 ~
.2U•
(A)lllJ
"'"'
2li(A)11.1 • m~
WEST FRONT STREET
LJ
•
• ll2 ,,., ,..,
•JU (A)l?J
MEAN CONCENTRATION 45. 78 mg/kg
,.
I
FIGURE 4-1
LEAD CONCENTRATIONS IN SOIL
HIGHLIGHTING CONCENTRATIONS EXCEEDING THE MEAN
FCX STATESVILLE REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION
STATESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA
\ --
1/ ill • (A)»,J
-=-
-
•12l2
(AJ17J
AU.. CONCENTRA TlONS IN m9/lu;i
---NOT OCT[CTED
J -[STIMATID CONCENTRAT1Cfri1S
C -CONFJn,jED BY OC:
A -AVERAGE CON(Df111AT10N
-
ill. ,..,..,
-
w•
(-')11J
N -PR£SUM'P~ E'o'IDENCE f"OR COMPOUND
~-AA!A ABOYE MEAN CONCENTRATKN
-
-
X
•
102 "' "''" I
"'
- -
• x-
\
"
SCALE
J7.5 I ,_; ---
- - - -- - --- -
WEST FRONT STREET
• 11ll
(A)52J
•
• 112 (A) IOOJ
•11l (A)'1J
• ~7lU
MEAN CONCENTRATION = 92.87 mg/kg
,.
FIGURE 4-2
CHROMIUM CONCENTRATIONS IN SOIL
HIGHLIGHTING CONCENTRATIONS EXCEEDING THE MEAN
FCX STATESVILLE REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION
STATESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA
\
(A)U,
(ll)e,,r
~ I - - - -(NFITT)
--- -
•m ....
w (.t.)11J
l1i 0 .,.,,,., .
-~... D
-""'-ALL CONCENTRATIONS IN mljl/kg
---NOT DETECTED
J -ESTIMATED CONCENTRATIONS
C -CONFIRM(D BY GC
A -AVERAGE COHCOflRATION
ill •
(A)SlJ
N -PRESUMPTIVE EVID(NC[ F~ COMPOUND
~ -AR£A ABOVE WEAN CONCENlRATlON
-
ill. ,~-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
greater than an order of magnitude higher than their respective
mean concentrations. Of these six metals, they are the most
likely to be considered site-related metals, as they are usually
present in fertilizer and agricultural lime.
The pattern of elevated potassium concentrations, shown in
Figure 4-3, is distinctly different than the pattern for calcium
and zinc, shown in Figures 4-4 and 4-5, respectively. The
highest concentrations of potassium were found in samples from
stations FS-209-SLA, FS-213-SLA and FS-216-SLA, all surface
soils, and from the surface soil sample collected at station FS-
222-SLA. There was a pattern of generally decreasing
concentrations around each of these areas.
observed over much of the site.
Lower values were
The highest calcium and zinc values were detected either at
the current rail siding on the north side of the warehouse or at
the site of the old, since-removed railcar unloading building,
located near the southwest corner of the intersection of Phoenix
Street and the rail line. The highest calcium concentration,
170,000 mg/kg, was found at station FS-224-SLA, located at one of
the siding docks. Nearby concentrations, 36,000 mg/kg to 53,000
mg/kg, were also significantly above the mean concentration for
calcium of 4,102 mg/kg. The sample from station FS-222-SLA, at
the site of the old unloading facility, contained the next
highest on-site concentration of calcium detected beyond the
siding area, 17,000 mg/kg. The zinc pattern, shown in Figure 4-
5, was similar, however, except that the highest detected
concentration of zinc, 3,900 mg/kg, was found at station FS-222.
The next highest concentration was found at one of the siding
locations, where a concentration of 500 mg/kg was detected.
Of the remaining metals -arsenic, mercury, cadmium and
selenium -listed by decreasing frequency of occurrence, are the
4-42
-- -- - --- - -- - - - - - - -
\
\....-<.: -I-z.u .2.li ,,_ (.t..)kl ,.,,?£\_ ~~~Mt.~~ ~ -X -X l!l!.":i( X ca•~ -x 00-'"'l( -x -X ~7( -X -~•~ X -X
-X .-X X -• •
X
ZZJ • C-)1100 1Jl2
(A)UO)(. • I ;iu (A)310
)( (a)DO
•
)( ~
•\ "''"' ll!l • (4)280 m~ )( .,,_
\
SCALE
" ' k .:.......i --( ... r[(T)
•
•
(~-«> '"'""'
• ~
• Jl!i
(A).U:,
(8)2100
' {ll)--(I) 210
e (Cl-• (C)290e (C)UO
,~ ~ J1Z ~;~g :'!! • • • rc)~
>Ill Jl1 ;m 1:1:: !~~ !~~
• Ja !:!"'
•
• ·= • Iii~ = ,.,,
'""' ,~ ,~
~
Jal•·= • A .l10 • .. ~,,.,
(I) llO
'""'
WEST FRONT STREET
(A)IIO • llQ
(A) <tlO
• 2il
~ '" ~~ ------• ~"'
X -X
cm-..,•
(If) 1100 • ·= if.-'" ... .,., m I~ • • • = f-1:i= .,,,
• " ..... • = 6 !{
2lli Z!Jljij~ i:i:F 2JI!
(A) 1200 " --D 310
X -X
• • 11.J ill • (A)MO '""'
• -¼J840
• 112 •1MD00 '" ... MEAN CONCENTRATION = 1,819 mg/kg
37.5 "
' '
FIGURE 4-3
POTASSIUM CONCENTRATIONS IN SOIL
FCX STATESVILLE REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION
STATESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA
-.f,?-.,,Pl
{11)210
~C)290
" I 1M
.w (-')11J
e &fl1100
(B) 1,0
-X
(A)IIOO
(11)390
lli 0 .,.,,,., '
-~,,, D
-=-AU. CONCDilRATJ(Jr,jS tN mo/lt9
---NOT DETECTED
J -ESTIMATm CONCENTRATIONS
C -CONfml(O BY CC
A -A\'tRACE CONCENlRATION
ill •
(A.)2!!00
=· (A)no:,
.l2ll •
{A)1100
H -PRESUMPTIVE EVIOOICE F'CJt ~D
....,, -llilE,ICNIJSii i • K8NCOBBBIJRA TICJ-1
-·
-- -- - --- - -- - - - - - --\
-/-\,...--:;::: 2J1\ :w ,~ ~ciAA,, -M~x\::L' '"""' ?f= ,.,,_ -x -X l!l.. ":,,: X (1)11~ --X ru_"'x -X -X .W.'°'l(
-X ...-X )( -. • •
X
• 1CIZ .,,_
"'"' I .,,_
lli •
(1)410
• J1.l ,.,...
C,)-
.(A)nu 00-
• Jli {A).clll
00-
"" (II) .,0
CCJ-• <CJm ill= • . h~
J11. • ~~, !---------'~===----_,
Jal e I~
om (A)1aol)
(II)--
I~~
.....
(~ moo .2Qi (1)'100
11(1-)JICI) -~ (I)-, G
(C)!leO
WEST FRONT STREET
• 1.00
(A.)1400 • 1lll (A) l70
LJ
•
clM
• 112 ,., ...
• X -X
•
• 11.J ill •
(A)UO (-')4100
• 1M,100
MEAN CONCENTRATION = 4,102 mg/kg
\
SCALE
7' , O 37.5
i--, -~--' ' ~-( tHITT)
"
'
FIGURE 4-4
CALCIUM CONCENTRATIONS IN SOIL
HIGHLIGHTING CONCENTRATIONS EXCEEDING THE MEAN
FCX STATESVILLE REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION
STATESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA
12J {A) 7110
/Ji(',f,; ~
• 12!1 ,., ""' I
--=--ALL CONCENTRATIONS rN mv/iu;J
---NOT DEITCTEO J -ESTIMATtD CCfritCDITRATIONS
C -CONFlRMED BY OC
A -A~AOC COMCENlRAllON
N -PRE.ruMPTTVE E\1DENCE Faff COW~D
~-A.REA A8Cl"o't: MEAN CONCENlRATlON
-
-
X
• lil2 ,<. -I
,<.
-
x-
-
• JLl ,.,,,.
'"'"
.<•>» 00---
-
• fil (A)~ ,.,,.
---
• .102 '""
• A --
o(~
(I) 41
(Olm
--
• • ~ .l1.i !:!!l
• • gf! f-;;
= • i:t;
WEST FRONT STREET
(A)MI • 11ll
{A)78J
•
--
•
•;us ...
(A)H m~
• = !W~
• i:ffl
• 11.l
(A)~
- -
221 • (A)M
(8)"
~ru~
X X
W,, .
\
-x
, .... ,,,.....
MEAN CONCENTRATION = 101.6
\
SCALE
75 I O 37.5
i--, --d ' (IMF"EtT}
"
'
FIGURE 4-5
ZINC CONCENTRATIONS IN SOIL
HIGHLIGHTING CONCENTRATIONS EXCEEDING THE MEAN
FCX STATESVILLE REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION
STATESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA
---
o.l.2!l. '" ...
lli 0 .,.,.., '
-v.a-. D
-=-AU. CONCENTRATICHS IN m9j\19
---NOT DETEClID
J -ESTIMATtD CONCENTRATlCNS
C -CONF"RWED BY OC
A -A'-{RAGE CONCENTRATION
-
ill •
'" "'
-
.LU.
{A) 72.1
m• '" ....
N -PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE ~ COMPOUND
~-/'.REA ABOYE MEAN CONCENlRATIOH
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
only metals of interest from either a site-related activity or
public health standpoint. These metals were found in 31 or fewer
samples, of the 187 collected for the study.
Much of the arsenic data was rejected. The useable data,
however, representing 31 samples, is still sufficient to indicate
a possible pattern of occurrence. Figure 4-6 shows the distri-
bution and concentration of arsenic detected in soils. The
highest concentrations were found in samples collected at FS-234-
SLA, FS-228-SLA and FS-226-SLA, where concentrations of 11 mg/kg,
10 mg/kg and 8 mg/kg, respectively, were detected. These
stations are located along the railroad tracks. Most of the
reported arsenic concentrations were in the 2 to 5 mg/kg range.
Mercury was detected in 19 samples. Most of these samples
were from two distinct areas, shown on Figure 4-7. The highest
concentrations were detected in surface soil samples collected at
stations FS-226-SLA and FS-250-SLA, where concentrations of 5.7
mg/kg and 1.4 mg/kg, respectively, were detected. The
concentrations at the remaining stations were generally less than
0.5 mg/kg.
Cadmium was· detected in only 11 samples. As can be seen in
Figure 4-8, there is no strong pattern of occurrence, although
there does appear to be a loose association with the area of high
concentrations of several of the other metals observed at
stations FS-226 and FS-250. Although this pattern suggests a
possible site relationship, the occurrence could be due to
naturally occurring cadmium concentrations. One sample collected
from a depth of 20 feet in a relatively unaffected area of the
site contained cadmium at a concentration of 1.3 mg/kg, which is
higher than the mean concentration of 1.12 mg/kg and as high as
many of the sample concentrations from within the delineated
pattern in Figure 4-8.
4-46
--- --- --~ -x..-x--x
-2Ji
(A)l1J !!bx •
- - --- - - -
\
X • • • x-~ ~m]f
l:l'.~x X -X X
102 ')( (I)-
w,., • • I JLl Jli ,.,_ <•>-
')( (10)--(I)-
I • • ~ if= ')( ..,__
•\ 1111 efA)-• l~ " (I)-J!li ,.,__
(I)--
~ (I)-
\
SCALE ,. ' 37.!I
' --
• Jill l:!::
• ~
,lQl ••
•c~
(I)-
WEST
,. 1--, rm '...J -- -
I
( IN FtIT )
{A)eJ .,,__ (1)4.1,1
• (C}-• (C)-i!t-. .m:f:l__-
~ • .ill • • ~/:: JU .J12 ~ l:l= • ~ . "J!lll • Jill ~= .(')-
• A::
(4>--·= -~ (1)2.7J
·1& (4)--(1)-C,)-(Q-
FRONT STREET
(A)l..l.l • llll (A) 2.TJ
0
• ~
• ~
J2l2 • l:t
• .2oo,'.2.li ~r..:::~ ,.,,...
•
• 112 (A)-
I
"ill
(A)--
rel=
• = ~~
• i:f:
2<111. mlw,
FIGURE 4-6
• =· 221
(A)--lli l:l= C,)--·-
•21§.rc~= 21Z• "' <•>-.,,_
• . --.2,li(A)-. --• m=
= 212lf: ~= = • (AJ.1J
x-
• ll,l ill • (A}--,.,_
• v., __
olli ,., __
ARSENIC DISTRIBUTION IN SOILS
FCX STATESVILLE REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION
STATESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA
•
X -
(A)--
C,>-
• a!!l-
C,)--
X • 12!1 ,.,__
J.li •
(AJ --
fil 0 .,,,_ '
.11!,,., D
-"°-ALL CONCENTRATIONS IN mq/lu;J
---NOT DETEClID J -ESTIMATID CONCENTRATIONS
C -CONFlRM!D BY OC
A -AVERAGE C0NCOffflATlON
N -PRESUMPTIVE EVIOCNCC f"OR COMPOUMJ
-
.120 • {AJ 2.IJ
-
--
X
-
•
• ;iu ,.,_
C,)-
-
... '\ . . . . • f=
\
SCALE
" D 37.~ ,.
~ ----- -
...J ' I
(IHfUT)
-- -
x-
• JI§.
!:I=
(A).1.7"4 ca>--(l)u
{C}--• {C)-
.UZ ~-
- -
... ·" "" ' "' "
- -
•
•-
- -
.221. • (A)--
(1)-
- -
\ - -
lli • ,.,_
• .lll -~ • ~ .J2.!l
J.li t:s= (A)->-------------J ~l=e----~re!= .1L2 I~= ~ •
• .Jl!A
if= rel=
I..
Jill• A -
•c~ ·= C,)-
,.,_
C,)-
WEST FRONT STREET
• • •11l 1l.O
UJl (A)--v•-W-,Ji:_
~ • .lli l12 (A)--,.,_
FIGURE 4-7
MERCURY DISTRIBUTION IN SOILS
FCX STATESVILLE REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION
STATESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA
,.,.,..
(I)-
•
-~-
• 't.L.
•'1Mu,1 0
-=-
•J.2ll W--
11.i
e(A)-
D
ALL CONCENTRATIONS IN m9J'k\l
---NOT 0£TEC1t0 J -ESTIMAT[D ca«:ENTRATIONS
C -CQ(flRMED BY CX:
A -AIJERAG£ CONCCNTRATiail
N -PRESUMPTIVE E\40EHCE fOR COWPOJND
· · · · · · ·-OISlRIBUTlCH PATTIRN
--7
--
X
• . lll7.
I'>--)(
I
)(
I
)(
•\ lQ1 !~ )(
\
--- -
•
C,)-
• .m ,.,_ ......
• JI-"! fl>-
• (A)--• • "J<ll • J!li ff= m= JIil
(A}--,.,_
(I)--
----
-x
• it.
:·:·:·:-:~:-.. ,.,_ .
- -- -
\
-1--n~ X \:=xL ~
X - X ~=Jf •~~
- - - -
12.l <•>-
ill • ,.,_
.l!l1 • ' -• A --' --. (l!lll:s· . x□• I W>-
0
SCALE
~_J -(INF'EET)
J7.5 :
,.
:
. = ,.,_
('}-w ~·E== 0 20ll i:i:.: 2JII • • .2C6.,,(2Ja • (A)-
1:r...::~ '" -m lit; .. _-X---X-~=--.,.-x~-x--x
WEST FRONT STREET (A)--
• lJlA , ... ~-• • • l1J 1.U • 110 <•>--,.,_ ,.,__ ,W--cs • ¥.!--
• .lli
ill (A)--
(A)-
FIGURE 4-8
CADMIUM DISTRIBUTION IN SOILS
FCX STATESVILLE REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION
STATESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA
(')-
x"i!f!: I
•¾f._
llB 0 . ,_
-"EL
• l2l2 ,.,_
lli e(A)--
' D
AU. CONCENTIV,TIONS IN m9,J\-9
---NOT DETECTED
J -ESTIMA TEO COHCENffiA TIONS
C -CONFlRMEO BY CC
A -AVERAOC CONQ)fT~AllON
N -PRE&.IMPTIVE E,,.,DENCE FOR COMPOUND
· · · · · · ·-DISlRIBUnai.. PATT[RN
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Virtually all of the selenium data was rejected. The
limited data, for approximately 12 samples collected at seven
stations, indicates that selenium is probably present at
background levels, which appear to range fFom non-detectable to
about 2 mg/kg. The limited occurrence is shown on Figure 4-9.
4.1.2.2 Pesticides
Thirteen pesticide compounds were detected in soil samples
collected for the investigation. Table 4-1 contains the sample
summary for these compounds and provides the frequency of
detection, range of concentrations and the mean concentration for
each compound.
4.1.2.2.1 4,4'-DDT, 4,4'-DDD, and 4,4'-DDE
By far the most significant pesticide compounds detected in
soil samples collected for the remedial investigation were the
compounds of the DDT family (4,4'-DDT and its degradation or
transformation products, 4,4'-DDD and 4,4'-DDE). Figures 4-10,
4-11, and 4-12 show the reported concentrations and pattern of
occurrence for each of the three compounds.
Of the three compounds, 4,4'-DDT (DDT) was detected in the
greatest number of samples l57 out of 187 total samples) and at
the highest concentrations. Figure 4-10 shows the DDT detection
boundary, as well as the 1,000 ug/kg, 10,000 ug/kg and 100,000
ug/kg isoconcentration boundaries. The highest concentrations
were detected in samples collected at locations under the eastern
half of the upper (western) section of the warehouse. The
highest concentration detected, 830,000 ug/kg, was detected in
the sample collected from the 12-inch to 16-inch interval at
station FS-319-SLB.
4-50
- - -- - - -
,.,__2Jl \_ ~ m (A)--
(I)--x-xl!c-e'< x )( -.x -X ..-x-
X • • x-
.lll2 "
(I)-,.,_ (A)--
00-(I)-C-}--I»--• • • (")..-• (C}-• (C)-I .lLl (~ lli (>)-f-!:I= ill f:l__-
(I}-(I)---" ~f I • • • • • ~ r= i:t: JI.I JU " !:l= I~:: (I}-•\
lll1 " .< .. >-• • ·-• !~ .,,_ .l2i !:i= m n--(•)-. --(A)--
(,)-' --
--2Ji (o\l--
-x tnc-x •
• • ~ ;m
!:I=
• • ~ !!f-:.
= •
---- --\
-f-
-x-~ cW-~~ ~' X ~X - X -,I'=.. X - X
•
[
·= (A)--
m=
• = ~I=
•
~
!~: X
• ·-
• . -I---''' -
X -
=· ~l=
X JI ~w. =
221 (A)--
0,)--
2,li(A)-
0 m::
•
•f:
X x'\ ,,-!E •
(9)--
{C)--
"
---
12.l {A)--
12.i •
(AJ--
Jm. e I-: .... :: !:t !:f:
\
i
SCALE • "~ ' _, -- -- --( tH£IT)
,.
I
o2!1l (A)--
(0)-
&I ~= • 21QJif: 2Jll (•)-•
WEST FRONT STREET . . .. ll!4 ...
(A)UII_·_· • lll1
(A) -
• • 1J.l
(A)--
.ill. (A)--
FIGURE 4-9
SELENIUM DISTRIBUTION IN SOILS
J.U
<•>--
FCX STATESVILLE REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION
STATESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA
X -
•
• *--
X -X
(A)--,.,_
ll.i D .,., __ _
-~-D
-=-AU. CONCOflRATIONS IN mg/I,:;
---NOT OETECTED
J -ESTIMATED CONCENTRATIONS
C -CONmMED BY CC
A -AVERAGE CONCENTRATION
N -PRESUMPTM EVIDENCE tOR COMPOUt«>
·-DISTRIBUTION PATTERN
ill. ,.,._
-
---- ---
2J1 \ \..----:::: ('-)1 J(
-X -X l!l.!.x r: X-x..-
= (A)I
X -.t~.x
X
• J.l)2 .,,_
"'' I .,,_
•
• • dli6 ~ (I)•
• JIM '". ..,,
~ (I)•
..................... ,_
J.02 ··-
--em (A)IO
(I).
. ff:
Jl.2 1.,., • ..,
I} 1200C
WEST FRONT
• (A) JOI 1IJl "('!> ... ~. ---.
- - - - - --\
-f. -2.H (A)X
X l!L• X • x~'
• =·
~mJj X
2Z1 • (A)lC
(D)X • ~J; ~_{ ·~ ,.j:::~·=========::::J
t.'!,oo!olm---..:::.7"==--,m,~ •21Arcfi0·· 21Z •
·._ (.-.)JI
·-._ (ll)ll • • f,,oo = ~rioc
• 21.i, ... ~ .. • fgl! • = • • 1:1:-~r:
2Qi ..
--
xD. I W,-.
I~ "' 231( I•· _. (A)X • ~
mJ!li
X -X x•~~ j •l2ll '".
T
(8)1 •
• • ll,l ill. • ,.,,. (A)X ,l/¼
-
12J (A}X
lli • ,., .
... . ·········· [j •1M"x
ill. 0 .,.,. '
-~D D
DETECT BOUNDARY
>1.000 ug/1,g
>10.000 ug/1,g
>100,000 ug/1,g
• lU (A)I
FIGURE 4-10
•·1bl •
JEL_
-'ll. CONa;NTRA TIONS lN 1,19/119
---NOT otTICTID
J -ESTIMATID CONCOHR-'TlONS C -CONFlRWEO BY GC
A -A'r'ERACE CONCENTRATION
-
ill. '""'
\ DDT DISTRIBUTION IN SOILS N -PRESUMPTIVE E'""OENC[ FOR COMPOUND
SCALE
0 37.5 " . ...J ' - - -- - - -
I
( IN FUT)
FCX STATESVILLE REMEDIAL INVEST/GA TION
STATESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA
-
--
X
• 1ll2 (A)--)(.
I
:,<
:,<
•\ 1ll1
x-
~ :,< I
-
• .JLl ('}--
·">-
-
• f=
• Jlli
(A)--•
(I)--
.JF-..,_
- - - -
.......__
---23¼ (A)--(IL-x •
\ <W-
-x -x\m-x •
2;8
~~l&.:.__
·. •mi:~:
'. C NA
•
- -
Ji ' --' --
X -X ~ 22.i O =
221 m• (A)--• ~I= .,,__
ZIZ o <•>-.,,__
Zli(A}-• IIO .·; • ro1=
--\
•r:
X '~\ 0,)--
(C}--
:,<
-~-.,,_
-
• l2!l ,.,__
-
12! •
(AJ --
-
WEST FRONT STREET (A)--
u
\
SCALE
" . 0 31.5 1-s;; '...I I
-I ( H f'££T}
• 1m
(.<)-
DETECT BOUNDARY
>1,000 ug/lc:g
>10,000 ug/lcg
>100,000 ug/lc:g
" I
• • • l1J ill.
l1Q (A)--('}--
(A)-(~-
~ • • lft}--ll2 (A)-
FIGURE 4-11
DDD DISTRIBUTION IN SOILS
FCX STATESVILLE REMEDIAL INVEST/GA TION
STATESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA
.,,__
•
• ¥,& __
• 1t!-
fil e(A}--
-~-0 D
--=--AU CONa:NTRA TlONS IN 119/111~
---NOT OETECTm
J -[STIMATrO CONCENTRATIONS
C -CONFlRMEO BY GC
A -AVERAGE CONC(NTRATION
N -PRESUMPTl"I{: E\'ID£NCC FOR COMPOUND
-
::';:;:;,. -- -- - -
.2.U <•>-(.,_2J1 \_ ~ -x-xl!l:-.x x 0,)-y_
-X .-x-Y. -.
X
• lllZ )( (.or-
\
x-
)(
\
•
(')-
• lli ,.,__ .,,__
·•·~lllZ · .. ?~~ .. .....
• J1Q !:!=
.xtl. • I -
... ·~m
' (A) 110
0,}-
(A) JI • l10 (A) 11
GENERALIZED DISTRIBUTION BOUNDARY
- - - - -- ---- -
\
-I-~ ~~ _nrx~J ,{A) 21 -;,c mc-x X ··-X m-x • ··... .
•
• 112 (A)-
•
Ji!= .. lE
• ~r:
2llll.
EE !1!= -
FIGURE 4-12
2i8
!:L~
• .lli
•-
•mi:~= "'
•
202 i:i:: •
•m (A}--
olli (A)--
ODE DISTRIBUTION IN SOILS
X -X JI ~22i = X
221 =. (A)--• ~!= (II}--
211• ·~-,,,__ 0,)--(a)-
fil(A}-• ffll=
212j§ = <•>-
X -X -X
(A)--
0,)--
ill. • (.,_
• *--
-~ 12.l (A)--x'\ <•~ (e)--
(C}--
)(
--1<0'._
•12l2 (.,__
ALL CONCENTRA TI OHS IN ug/lu;,
---NOT DCTECTID
J -ESTIMATED CONCENTRATIONS
C -CONF1RM(D BY CC
A -AVERAGE CONCENTRATION
ill •
C-"--
ill.
('l-
12ll • (.,__
N -PRESUMPTIVE E\1DENCE FOR COMPOUND
FCX STATESVILLE REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION
STATESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA
SCALE
7! O ]7.5
L ~ I
,..._ -I
,.
I
( N FUT}
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
\
Beyond the 1,000 ug/kg isocontour, the observed contam-
ination is primarily surficial. Within this isocontour, however,
in areas of higher concentrations, significant subsurface
contamination was detected. At stations FS-319 and FS-324, in
particular, the deepest subsurface samples collected were
considerably higher in concentration than the samples collected
at the higher intervals at the same locations. Occurrences such
as these appear to indicate that cleaner soils were placed as
fill, above existing contaminated surface soils.
The next most significant of the DDT family of compounds was
4,4'-DDD (DDD). DDD was detected in 41 of the 187 samples col-
lected. The highest concentration detected was 160,000 ug/kg, in
the sample collected at FS-302-SLA, from the 42-inch to 48-inch
interval. Field logs indicate a whitish material immediately
above the sampling interval. Figure 4-11 shows the locations at
which samples containing DDD was detected. This figure also
shows the 1,000 ug/kg, 10,000 ug/kg and 100,000 ug/kg iso-
concentration lines. Both the general detection boundary and the
isoconcentration boundaries for DDD are similar, but not as
extensive as those for DDT. General indications are that depths
of significant contamination, i.e., greater than several thousand
ug/kg DDD, are probably within one to two feet below the base of
the floor, however, at locations FS-226 and FS-302 this degree of
contamination may be found at depths of two to four feet.
The distribution pattern for 4,4'-DDE (ODE), though more
limited in extent and based on fewer detections, is very similar
to that of DDT and DDD. Figure 4-12 shows this pattern and the
concentrations of DDE detected in samples collected for the
investigation. The highest concentration of DDE, 1,800 ug/kg,
was detected in the surface soil sample collected at station FS-
224-SLA.
4-55
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
4.1.2.2.2 Chlordane
Chlordane, usually occurring as an alpha-and gamma-
chlordane pair, was detected in 12 and 14 samples, respectively,
out of 187 samples collected. The highest concentrations of each
of these compounds was detected in the sample collected at
station FS-210-SLA. Of the two, gamma-chlordane was detected at
the highest concentration, 1,800 ug/kg; alpha-chlordane was
detected at a concentration of 1,400 ug/kg. Figure 4-13 shows
the stations where chlordane was detected. The alpha-and gamma-
chlordane concentrations were combined for this map. Further
differentiation of the chlordane at a particular location may be
found in the data summary tables. The distribution and
characterization shown in Figure 4-13 is probably not truly
representative of the actual chlordane distribution and risk
scenario at the site. In fact, sampling conducted in 1986 by
NCDHR, in the vicinity of ESD stations 200 through 206, revealed
considerably higher chlordane concentrations, on the order of
317,500 ug/kg, than detected in any of the samples collected for
the RI. At all of the locations at which DDT, ODD, and ODE were
detected, quantification or detection limits for chlordane were
elevated to levels much higher than those for soils collected at
relatively uncontaminated locations. Detection limits at some of
the DDT-contaminated sample locations were typically 19;000
ug/kg, with one detection limit as high as 75,000 ug/kg. The
true distribution of chlordane, as well as the area where risk-
based concentrations are present, is not fully known at the FCX-
Statesville site.
4.1.2.2.3 Dieldrin
The next most frequently detected pesticide compound was
dieldrin, detected in 10 of 187 soil samples. The highest
reported concentration of dieldrin was 40,000 ug/kg in the sample
collected at a depth of 24 inches at FS-226-SLB. Figure 4-14
4-56
- ---------- - - - -- - -
\
7-~ ,_m \ m :z.:H ~iiP--\:;}t~ X ~ ~ (A)--(AJ--
-X -X l!l:-.X X (I)---x llc-x - X - X -"r-x -x..-x )( -.x • •
X • • x-
1ll1. ,<. (1)-
w-• • \ .m Jli ,_ (A)--
,<. -~~ 0,)-
\ • • ,<. ,i'fll.·, f= •\ · ... ~>-:-:-···
1QI. • (A)-• !~ ,<. 00>-JIM
(A)--
(9)-
-..Wx ~
j {0)-
\
SCALE
• Jf . --
2il ' --~22.iD= X X -X l:t:
221 • .22<2. (A)--•
!:l= (11)--
•-
• Jlll 1:t: o.m*~c• 2l2. C" ,,,_ ,.,_
• ~
;m ., --
•c:e (0)-
WEST FRONT STREET
• • • lJ.l J.U • lll1 (A)--<•>-
(A) --,W--
~ • 'IW--
• olli
ill (A)--
(A)-
GENERALIZED DISTR1BUTION BOUNDARY
FIGURE 4-13
CHLORDANE (ALPHA AND GAMMA) DISTRIBUTION IN SOILS
FCX STATESVILLE REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION
STATESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA
D 37., " ...J I - - ----I
(NF!IT)
•f: 12J (A)--
X x'\ ,.~.
(B)--
(C)--
:,(
·~-0,)-
•W>-
ill. • {A)--
'
• 1M-D D
-KIL All CONCENTRATIONS IN ugjkg
---NOT 0£TICTID J -tSTIMATEO CONCENTR.-.TIONS
C -CONFlRMED BY GC ·
A -AVERAC( CONC£NlRAT10N
ill •
(AJ --
m•
(A)-
ill. ,.,._
N -f'R[SVMPTIVE ~DENCE f~ COMPOUND
-
- -- -- - --- - - -- --- -
\
~ -I-
,.,_m \_ ·. z.J.l :w. ~ cw. ~~ x¼_~ •.{A) -(Al n
-x-xt!l:-.ic x ·oo--x CIL-x -.x-X ru,-X -x->4''=-)( ~ )(.
-X r-x-' . • •
JI X .. ··2i"·.
~22i = •f: .!.2J • CAJ --• • !:~·! X -X X '~\ JJIZ "-
(0)-(A)-(A)l-t,000 i (II)--(I}-·-. (11)4Q.ooo ..,_ • • • Co>-• C,}-• (Cl-"-(C) 3' 221 I .JU .~ J1ll ill {:!. ·.:. ..... • =. • (C}--(<}-!:t: (A)--I-!:l= C,}--"-(I)-(R}--···-"--• • ~f • .l2:i .. ·-lli ' (AJ.·U • • • • • ~l= J:l'" '* if= Jll2 JU JU C ~0 •ZJ.D.rc~= "-!:l= fil= !~= "' ZIZ • ·~-(I}-,,,_ •\ • • • (I)--
~ = .,,_
.un •'")-f--~l= !!!= "-• • • J!l!l • -(I}-Jlli if= = (<}-m= w-= • ru,..,r-x□• "-C,)-• • ' --• !ll= !:t £ ·-.l!l1 •• -• A_:
(<)--209.
I w-,__
~ •c~ ·= o(~ (I}--0 !:i:: = iwJ[g -LW-xJ .,,_ (I}-(A)--<•>-·2& • 2ll0./2.li 2!lll. • ,,,__
x"i:f: I (O}-
Ell !ij= (Cl-!:t:~ (<)-• l2ll -x-X -x ,.,__
WEST FRONT STREET (A)--
C,)-
(A)-• • • l.Ll l.Ll • llil (A}--. {A}-• *-... ,_ (*-
• ~ ll.i e(A)--. ~--D ' 0 • olli 112 (A)---~-(.o.)-
CENERAUZED ~STRIBUTI~ BOUNOARY
-=--~ CONCENTRATIONS IN ug/lrg
---NOT DETECTID
FIGURE 4-14 J -ES TIM A TED CONCENTRATIONS
C -CONFlRMED BY CC
A -AVERAGC CONCOHRATION
-
lli.
{AJ --
rn • ,.,_
ill. ,.,._
\ DIELDRIN DISTRIBUTION IN SOILS N -PRESUMPTl\'£ E'JIOENCE fOR COMPOUND
SCALE
0 37.5 -..,J I ---- - -(INFITT)
,.
I
FCX STATESVILLE REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION
STATESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA
-
I
I
I
I
I
shows the distribution of dieldrin. This distribution pattern
must also be qualified, as was the one for chlordane. Detection
limits for dieldrin were greatly elevated in the same samples as
were those for the chlordane. As such, th.e distribution could be
somewhat greater than indicated.
4.1.2.2.4 Other Pesticide Compounds
Seven .other pesticide compounds -endrin, heptachlor, I heptachlor epoxide, alpha-BHC, beta-BHC, gamma-BHC (lindane), and
aldrin -were detected in soil samples collected for the
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I·
I
investigation. These compounds comprise the group having the ·
lowest frequency of detection, and were present in no more than
five samples (endrin and heptachlor) and in as few as one sample
(aldrin). Table 4-1 contains the frequency of detection, range
of concentration and mean concentration for each of the
compounds.
4.1.2.3 Extractable Organic Compounds
A large number of extractable organic compounds, 60 percent
of which were polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), were
detected in the soil samples collected for this remedial
investigation. Nineteen of the twenty-one most frequently
detected extractable organic compounds were PAHs. Within this
group of nineteen compounds are the six PAH compounds designated
as carcinogenic, as well as three non-carcinogenic PAHs specified
in Preliminary Remediation Goals for the site. The sampl~
summary for the extractable organic compounds, indicating
frequency of detectio~, range of concentration and mean
concentration for all of these compounds, is found in Table 4-1.
The combined carcinogenic PAH results are discussed
together, followed by a discussion of the three non-carcinogenic
4-59
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
PAH compounds. The extractable results discussion concludes with
a general discussion of the remaining significant compounds.
4.1.2.3.1 Carcinogeni~ PAH Compounds
The six carcinogenic PAH compounds are, in order of both
frequency of occurrence and highest concentration detected,
benzo-(b/k)fluoranthene (22 samples, maximum concentration of
14,000 ug/kg), chrysene (20 samples, maximum concentration of
11,000 ug/kg), benzo(a)anthracene (18 samples, maximum con-
centration of 11,000 ug/kg), benzo(a)pyrene (18 samples, maximum
concentration of 7,500 ug/kg), indeno(l,2,3-CD)pyrene {17
samples, maximum concentration of 5,400 ug/kg) and
dibenzo(A,H)anthracene (four samples, maximum concentration of
2,300 ug/kg).
The total concentration for these six compounds was
calculated for each sample in which they were detected. These
total concentrations are shown on Figure 4-15. The baseline risk
assessment, to be incorporated in the Phase II report, will
contain an evaluation of these compounds using a toxicity
equivalency factor for each of the compounds, based on its
relative potency with respect to benzo(a)pyrene. The highest
total carcinogenic PAH concentration, 51,200 ug/kg, was detected
at station FS-121-SLA, located between the old office building
and Phoenix Street, at the eastern end of the site. The next ' highest total concentration, 10,440 ug/kg, was detected in the
sample from FS-318-SLB, collected at a depth of 12 inches below
the floor of the warehouse. All other totaL concentrations for
these compounds were less than 10,000 ug/kg. Excluding stations
FS-121 and FS-318, the stations with the highest total
conc8ntrations were generally located down-grade of and near the
railroad tracks north of the site. Most of the highest values
reported represent surface soil contamination. Results for I stations FS-318, FS-322 and FS-325 are similar to those observed
4-60 I
I
-
X
--
• .x .. -. ··•, C->-.
\
• m ,.,._
"'-
.(A)-
(')-
SCALE
• lli ,.,_
C,)-
• f=
• JO¼ ,.,_
(9)-
~
C,)-
0 37.5 ..,J--1 -- -- -(NrtET)
- - - - - - - --
• Jlll 1:i::
• ~ -
.l!ll • ' ---
•c~ C,)-
2-l½ (A) &,070
-x rue-X x-
• J11 !:l=
• J!l!l ~=
• 2!l.l (.-.)---
(9)-
•
• ~ JllZ (AJ--
(AJ.:.."..:.··
2Q! .(&)BIO
o(')_-:C .... -'!11:i. 0)-EJ (C)-_.-
•
·······--.. • ~·
• f.-·""
"2ll • 1:t
• ir· -
• ill n--~ ,-.. ·
• = 1:1-
• 1:f:
.··•Zf
1:i:: X
• ·-•-
•filrc~= '"'
• • ' --
X - X
21Z. ,.,_
(9)-
221 • (A)--
(11)--
WEST FRONT STREET
(A)-• l1ll
(A) -
• • l1J
(A)--
GENERALIZED DETECTION BOUNDARY
FIGURE 4-1.5
TOTAL CARCINOGENIC PAH COMPOUNDS IN SOILS
FCX STATESVILLE REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION
STATESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA
,.
I
,,,__
-\ -- -
-'<Ii._
• J2ll ,.,__
12.l {A)--
All. CONCENTRATIONS IN ug/1u,1
---NOT OETEClil)
J -ESTIMATED CONCENTRATIONS
C -CONFlRWEO BY CC
A -AVERACC CONctNlRATlON
ill •
(A) --
-
N -PRESUMPTIVE E\1DENCE F"OR COl,POUNO
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
for many of the pesticides, in terms of relative concentrations
observed in surficial and subsurface soils, supporting the
contention that significantly contaminated soils, presumably the
original ground surface, are present beneath fill material used
as an engineered sub-base beneath the floor of the warehouse.
4.1.2.3.2 Specified Non-Carcinogenic PAHs
The three non-carcinogenic PAH compounds specified for risk
assessment evaluation are pyrene, fluoranthene and anthracene.
Pyrene and fluoranthene were detected at about three times as
many stations as anthracene and were found at considerably higher
concentrations than anthracene. Pyrene and fluoranthene were
each detected at their highest concentration, 170,000 ug/kg for
each, in the sample from FS-121-SLA. The highest anthracene
concentration detected, only 5,200 ug/kg, was also from the
sample collected at FS-121-SLA. The distribution pattern for
these three compounds is very similar to that of the other PAH
compounds. In particular, most of the stations at which the
highest concentrations of non-carcinogenic PAH compounds were
detected were the same stations at which the highest
concentrations of the carcinogenic PAH compounds were detected.
Figures 4-16, 4-17 and 4-18 show the distribution of pyrene,
fluoranthene and anthracene, respectively, across the site. The
pattern of occurrence is similar to that of the carcinogenic PAH
compounds, i.e., the contamination is primarily surficial,
although contamination is apparent in ''original'' surficial soils
beneath fill material under the warehouse floor.
4.1.2.3.3 Other Extractable Organic
Compounds
Only three other extractable organic compounds were detected
in greater than ten samples. These are, with their frequency of
detection and maximum detected concentration, benzo(G,H,I)
4-62
--- ---- - - -- - -
X
• IJl2 )(
W-I
..... : ....
)(
\
SCALE
•
• f=
• Jlli ,,,_ ~,-
75 ' O 37.5
L ~...I I ~-[ (NfrrT)
• • JQII • if: !ii= Jill ,.,_
Jal •• --. "::
-x
• J1i I:!=
• ~
2Ji V,:11100
L1.b-X •
• ~·
• f;;;;
= • 1:t
•
ir -
• =-· !l" . ~
C ""'
. . = 1:1=
• i:f:
2i"
1:;..~
•
•-
•Zll~f.: '"'
•
221 • (A)--
(11)--
_ ......
~'''" rel=
WEST FRONT STREET
• 10!!
(A) -• 1lll
(A) -
•
• ll2
(A)--
ofil (A)--
lU • (A)440
GfNERALIZED DEltCTION BOUNDARY
FIGURE 4-16
PYRENE DISTRIBUTION IN SOILS
FCX STATESVILLE REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION
STATESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA
,,
I
<•>-
\ --- -
•ft-::-
'~'l (1)--
(C)--
)(
I • )( 1f.t-
□ ~121 ·.. (A)1
• .l2l2 ,,..__
l1i
0 •<•>--'
ill D • (A)1~
__m__
ALL CONCCNlRATlONS IN ugjlrg
---NOT DETECTED
J -ESTIMAITD CONCENTRATIONS
C -CONRRMED BY GC
A -AVERAGE CONctNTRATlON
ill •
(A) --
-
N -PRESUMPTIVE E"flDENCC FOR COMPQJNO
-
---
--··)f -X
X • • ... _ . ······c,)-..
1Q2 ,< • l'r-
I JLl ,~
,< C,)-
•
,< ~
C,)--•\ 1ll1 e(A}-!~ ,< c,)-
,<
\
SCALE ,, ' 0 b-.-...J ~
( IN f"EtT }
---- -
lll (--.)no "'""-· )( -."
(l.)MO
-x
-
. ·······--. ······ ~;-~~ ....... </'>--(Ii) 190 • • ,.,,__ • {C)--e ·····(C)-
Jli i:i:: JII. ..JIZ !:!.--(A)--!:t: ····--............. .,,__ • [f • ~i ;}Li • • • •
----
• 1=
.J25"_.
2f ~m)t
i:t:? X -X
221 • ;uQ • (A)--• ·-~l= (a)--,_
- -
\
•I:
X ,~1 (a)--
(c}---
)(
--
12.l (A)--
-
m~l~D i:r-: f= it ,ill ill !:t: !~== •llircf.; 2.1.Z • ·~-,.,_
• J!li
(A)-
(10)-
37.5
'
• _:. • ~ = I ~!= • ·= • ··-.. ;,o = ~ lil= (~-: ,l2Q -• • i:t ~r: Jal. •• -.. --' --
ca>-
• .21.i (A}-• rot:
.. ~ ZOi !~i = C•>-
(~--
(a)-0 ··········. .w . _ .. -··•· ·-.lim. (1)-
(0l-
21Dlt
X -X
0 . . 2llOL2JS. . ) ~!;'_ ,.,,,. 1B It-L.__x.-...,x...~~,.....--"'--
WEST FRONT STREET
• l1Q
(A) -
•
• 112
(A)-
• 1L1 ill • (A)-(~10
• 1M--
ill • (A)--
GENERALIZED DElECTION BOUNDARY
FIGURE 4-17
FLUORANTHENE DISTRIBUTION IN SOILS
FCX STATESVILLE REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION
STATESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA
,,
'
-x
(A~-,,,__
(a)--
lli
ill O •oc•>-
• (A) 17'11 ::
_m.__
~ CONC[HTRA TIONS IN u9fl,:9
---NOT DETECTID J -ESTIMATED CONCEN'JJV,TIONS
C -COHFlRMEO B'I' GC
A -AVERAGE CONa:JHRATICI\I N -PRESUMPTIVE E'dOENCt FOR COMPOUND
-
----- ---
,.,_m \_ ~ .z.u (A}--
-X -X l!c-.x X
(11)---.. x
-X .-X )( -.)(
X • • lll2 ,< (I)-{A)--(10)--(I)--w--• • • (C}-• (C)-I .m Jli Jill ..l1Z i:t -,.,_ (A}--I:!= (10)-(10)--,< ff • I J1i • • • • • i:r--= er/! f= Jl.12 Jll ;m ,< 1:t: i;i:: I:!:: . , (0)-• \~ 1m. .(A)-• • • I~ "' (0)--~ •;io,i ;m
<•>-~= (')-
(I)-
-
-2Ji (') ... W=--x •
• ~ · .
• f-: = •
-- - ---\
~
X -~~x •
~~ -x-1-"'==-x~'
2i" JI ·~ . . .. • ii~? .X -·x ~22.i. = X '~\ 2Zl (0)---• lZ2. • (C)-I (A)---1:1= (11)--·= .... reg . :..,:_
' •ZIArcF.= 2.11. • f.!!!_ '"' • (')-(0)-= (0)-
f.'l=
• fil(A)-• . --• ~!= . --
- -
ill •
(A) --
-
w• (A)-
Jal •• • A:: 1:t: ~r:
\
SCALE
n o J1.,
Lw~ I ,..__~ I
( H rcrr)
WEST FRONT STREET
• llQ
(A) -
•
• ll2 (A)-
• llJ
(A}--
-GENERALIZED DISTRIBUTION BOUNDARY
" I
FIGURE 4-18
ANTHRACENE DISTRIBUTION IN SOIL
FCX STATESVILLE REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION
STATESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA
,.,_
11ll 0 •<•>-'
.v.,_ D
-"EL
AU CONC£NTRAT10NS IN ug,11,-g ---NOT O[l[CTFD
J -ESTIMATED CONCENTRA.TIONS
C -CONFlRWED BY GC
A -AVERAct CONCOHRATIOH
12ll. ,.,__
N -PRESUMPTIVE °'0£Hcr FOR CCU"OUNO
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
perylene (16 samples, maximum concentration of 5,800 ug/kg),
phenanthrene (15 samples, maximum concentration of 21,000 ug/kg)
and pentachlorophenol (12 samples, maximum concentration of
420,000 ug/kg).
The pattern of occurrence for benzo(G,H,I)perylene and
phenanthrene is similar to the pattern previously identified for
the other PAH compounds. Pentachlorophenol, however, has a
distinctly different pattern of occurrence. Figure 4-19 shows
this pattern. With the exception of a single sample collected at
station FS-204-SLA, all samples containing detectable
pentachlorophenol were collected from stations under the upper
section of the warehouse, primarily in the vicinity of the
eastern end. The stations comprising this pattern of occurrence
are FS-302, FS-307, FS-312, FS-317 and FS-319. The highest
concentrations detected were from samples FS-307-SLA, 270,000
ug/kg, and FS-319-SLB, 420,000 ug/kg. These stations correspond
to the area originally occupied by the western wing of the
original structure (see Figure 1-4). It was within this
structure that a in-ground pesticide mixing pit allegedly existed
prior to the demolition and subsequent reconstruction at the
site.
In addition to the aforementioned extractable organic
compounds, there were 40 other extractable organic compounds
detected in the samples collected for this investigation. Most
were detected in fewer than five samples and many of these in
only one or two samples. These compounds represent additional
PAH compounds, various phthalates, fatty acids, carboxylic acids,
phenols, decanes, and one presumptive occurrence of octachloro-
dibenzodioxin (reported as a miscellaneous extractable organic
compound in the sample from FS-307-SLA, at an estimated
concentration of 3,000 ug/kg).
4-66
-- - ---- - - - - ---- - - -
' -1-
,.,_2Jl \_ ~ m 2Ji ~ ~ ~~ \::-:\_ ~ .,,__ (AJ--
-X-x!!l:-.>c X (I)---x 11.b-x -X - X :r-x -X -'JI>::::___ X - X
-X ..-x-)( -.x •
X 2i' ~21f •i: w • (A)--• • X X -X X
X 'l m"'
.,,_ (A)--.. •◄A)--._
!W:
!:l:: .. ~ ... ····oo-('I}--.. ··· (I)--...,_ • • • (~-• {c>-::,··· (C)-221 (9)--
I ;m .~ ·· ... ~ ··Jll ... .ill 1:1;:" • =· (A)--• (0)-,.,_ f;I= !:l= (9)--.,,_ .,,_ ill • ,< ~f • ·= (AJ --• ~ J1.9. n--• • • • • i:r• . --~ r= !:t: ' --•m~~: ,< JU fil lli. -~-!:l= !~~ "' •\
.,,__ • '• • ,.,_ (I)--
~ = .,,_
1lll _,.,_ ,_
1:1= !~ ,<
.,,_ • • ·-:_ . -.l2i if= ~= :Jill ,.,__ : (~ 270,000 = • fil(A}-m• .,,_ • • . -• ffll= ,.,_ x□• i:t £ Jill •• -•., ~o I W,_ ,.,_ .2<12 ~ •dE ·= -~-(8)--['] ~ .2Jll 21J2j~~ -~ • =. ..,_ .,,_ ,.,__
(1)-= <•>-(I)-(<)-i:r..:~ ,,,_ Ell It -X
WEST FRONT STREET
• • 10II 1ll2 • • •m ll.O • (A)-C,)-llll (A)--,.,_
{A) -,if-_
~ . ~--
• •1M-ll2 (A)-
\
GENER-'l . .JZID DISTRIBUTION BOUNDARY
SCALE
'..J ------ -
,.
al
(NFrrT)
FIGURE 4-19
PENTACHLOROPHENOL DISTRIBUTION IN SOIL
FCX STATESVILLE REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION
STATESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA
X -X
(A)--,,,_
x
0&f: I • .l2l2 ,.,__
• ll,.L.
llit ., ... , __
D ' D • 1M-
-=-AU CONCENmATIONS IN u1,ll'k;
---NOT DITECTm J -tsTIMATEO CONCOHRATIONS
C -C(l,,IFlRMEO BY GC
A -A'wt:RACC CONCENTRATION
ill. ,.,__
N -Pff[StJMPTlYE E\10ENCE FOR COMPOUND
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
\
4.1.2.4 Purgeable Organic Compounds
Twelve purgeable organic compounds were detected in soil
samples collected for the investigation. None were detected in
samples from the background location. Table 4-1 is the soil
sample summary, containing the list of purgeable organic
compounds detected in soil samples, with their frequency of
detection, range of concentration and mean concentration.
Trichloroethylene, detected in 23 samples, was by far the
most frequently detected purgeable organic compound in soils.
Measured concentrations, however, did not exceed 21 ug/kg.
Tetrachloroethylene was the next most frequently detected
compound. It was detected in seven samples, at concentrations
not exceeding 15 ug/kg. Figure 4-20 shows the distribution of
trichloroethylene and tetrachloroethylene at the FCX site.
Although the distribution of these compounds appears to be fairly
random, it may be controlled by the presence of a plume of
tetrachloroethylene in contaminated ground water identified
beneath the site.
Acetone, detected in three samples, 1,2-dichloroethene,
tetrahydrofuran, chloroform, total xylene, ethyl benzene,
chlorobenzene, pinene, trimethylcyclohexane, and ethylmethyl-
cyclohexane, all detected in only one sample, comprise the
remaining purgeable organic compounds detected in soils at the
site. They were all found at low and insignificant levels.
4.2 Ground Water
. Ground water samples were collected from a variety of
sources to characterize ground water quality both on site and in
the surrounding area. Samples were collected from 12 on-site
monitoring wells, one deep, off-site well at the Carnation
facility immediately west of the site, and from three residential
4-68
--
-x
X
• X
1Q2 )( "'' I
)(
I
)(
•\ 1l!1 im )(
\
- - - -- -- - - -
,.,,.m\
-xl!l?e><
•
"" • • JJ.1 ,lli
(A)ll '"" "" (1)1 .
• • aP.6 ~ .. ,.
e(A)X • "'' Jlli
(A)X
"''
\...-<.: r.T-" x-x....-x
' "''' • • '"' (:f: JlJI . !:l~ '
• • Jll2 JU 1:1: 1:i:
• • Jll!i if: m:
Jlll •• '
= (A)I
"' """ -X )( -."
(At-211'"-JJ
(1}-.JJ/l"-111 • '"' ,fil i:i:
. fir • Jl!l 1:i: JU 1~: •
• ~ JIil <~•
Ui (A) ,-U
<ID X •
• .if ..
• f: = •
•" 1:1:
(A)X
(8) T-3.1 ~ •"clf "'
WEST FRONT STREET
• • l1ll ''"" ,li¾
~ • ill
(A)x
x-
•
~: ' ' • ' .lli
j' :
1:1: • ~:ff
" •
• ll,l
(A)X
•1Mx
-x-x
•
ill.
(A)ll
221 • (A)ll
"''
lli (A) T-l,I • m:
•
• ~ P-1~
T -TRlo-n.OROETH'ltENE
SCALE
O J7.5
P -Tt:TRACHLOROETHYl.DIE
"
FIGURE 4-20
TRICHLOROETHYLENE & TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
IN SOIL
FCX STATESVILLE REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION
STATESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA
(A)l
"''
__, ,
~ ,
( IN F'EET )
\ ----
• 12!2
(""
fil 0 .,.,, '
.w.. D
--1<Q'._
"'-..1. CONCENTRATIONS IN m<;1,h:9
---NOT DETECTm
J -ESTIMATED CCNCDHRATIONS
C -CONFlRMEO BY GC
A -AVERAC£ CON'ctNlRATlai
ill •
(A)X
-
12ll •
'""'
N -PRESUMPTIVE E\10ENCE FOR COMPOUND
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
wells south of the site. Tables 4-5 and 4-6 contain the ground
water sample summaries, including the number of detects, the
range of concentrations and the mean concentration for each of
the metals or compounds detected in at least one sample. Tables
4-7 and 4-8 are the analytical data summary tables for monitoring
well and process/potable well samples, respectively. In addition
to the analytical data, the insitu parameters (pH, specific
conductance and temperature) are also summarized in Table 4-9.
The complete data are found in Appendix Band the samples are
described in Table 2-3. The analytical results are discussed in
the following.
4.2.1 Background Ground Water Quality
4.2.1.1 Metals
Based on the ground water flow direction described in
Section 3.1.4.3, Site-Specific Hydrogeology, well MW-4 was
selected as the background well for the site. It is located
upgradient of the site and should not be impacted by any
historical site activity.
Fourteen metals were detected, including calcium, iron,
magnesium, potassium, sodium, aluminum, barium, chromium, copper,
manganese, strontium, titanium, vanadium and zinc. All of the
detected concentrations for these metals in well MW-4 were below
the calculated mean concentration for all monitoring well
samples, except for barium. The concentration of barium at well
MW-4 was 140 ug/1, versus the mean concentration of 126.7 ug/1.
All concentrations, including barium, are probably representative
of background values. Table 4-5 may be referred to for a more
definitive summary of the range and mean concentrations for
metals in monitoring well samples.
4-70
I
I TABLE 4-5
GROUND WATER SA/1PLE SUMMARY
GROUND WATER ANALYTICAL DATA (EXCWDING POTABLE WELLS) I ,,
FCX-STATESVILLE REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION
STATESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA
I NUMBER OF NUMBER OF
METALS SAl1PLES1 DETECTS RANGE HEAN2
(mg/1) (mg/1)
I Calcium 13 13 0 .27 24 6.9
Iron 13 13 0.17 41 11. 9
Magnesium 13 13 0.89 11 4.6 I Potassium 13 13 1.1 -7.6 3.5 Sodium 13 13 2 -50 17.5
I (ug/ 1) (ug/1)
Aluminum 13 13 54 · 26,000 7,222.5 Barium 13 13 7.1 · 350 126.7 I Beryllium 13 2 ND 3 • 6 .8 4.1 Chromium 13 10 ND 84 28.0 Cobalt 13 9 ND 36 15.6
I Copper 13 11 ND 59 23.4 Lead 13 5 ND 29 16.8 Manganese 13 12 ND 1,500 507. 0 Nickel 13 9 ND 38 26.7 I Strontium 13 13 4.8 180 76.3 Titanium 13 12 ND 740 283.2 Vanadium 13 s ND . 86 31.1
I Yttrium 13 9 ND -120 3 7. 2 Zinc 13 131 4.0 . 99 41.8
I PESTICIDES/PCBS
Alpha-B//C 13 4 ND 5.4C 2.07 Beta-B//C 13 5 ND 4.8C 1.21 I Del ta ·B//C 13 4 ND 2. 9C 0.85 Gamma-BHC(Lindane) 13 4 ND 16C 5.04 Alpha-chlordane 13 1 ND 0.51 0.51
I Gamma-chlordane 13 1 ND 0.36 0.36
Trans-nonachlor 13 1 ND 0. 1 OJN 0. lOJN Oxychlordane(octachlor-
I epoxide 13 1 ND 0 .13 0 .13 Dieldrin 13 3 ND 0 .13 0.07 Endrin 13 2 ND 0.06 0.04 Endr in Ketone 13 5 ND 3. 1 0.79 I
I
I 4-71
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
TABLE 4-5 (Cont.)
GROUND WATER SA!1PLE SUHHARY
GROUND WATER ANALYTICAL DATA (EXCWDING POTABLE WELLS)
FCX-STATESVILLE REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION
STATESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA
EXTRACTABLE ORGANIC
COMPOUNDS
NUHBER OF
SA!1PLES
1 .2.4-Trichlorobenzene
(Methylpropyl)dinitro-
phenol
Bis(dimethylethyl)-
methylphenol
Bromacil
Butvlidenebis((dimethvl-
ethv 1) -meth_y 1) phenol
Butvlidenebis((dimethyl-
ethyl)-eth.vlphenol)
Dodecanoic acid
Hexadecanoic acid
Nonanoic acid
Me thy 1 (me thy lpropeny 1) -
c_vclcipenr.ane
PURGEABLE ORGANIC
COMPOUNDS
(Ill-and/or p-)Xvlelle
1.1 .1-Trichloroethane
1 .l-Dichloroetha11e
1·.l-Dichloroethene
BromOdichloromet.hane
Carbo11 tecrachloride
Chloroform
Chloromethane
cis-1.2-Dichloroethene
1.2-Dichloropropane
Diisopropylether
Tet.rachloroethene
Trichloroethene
Trichlorofluoromethane
Trichlorotrifluoroethane
FOOTNOTES:
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
NUHBEJI. OF
DETECTS
1
2
1
5
2
1
4
1
1
1
4
4
5
1
1
8
1
5
1
9
4
1
1
RANGE
(ug/1)
ND
ND
ND
ND
,"lD
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
,VD
ND
,VD
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
l,'D
ND
ND
ND
ND
l.7J
20JN
lJN
90JN
lOOJN
2JN
20JN
lOJN
5JN
lJN
8.2J
13J
19J
29
l.4J
4.2J
10
2. 9J
42
2.9AJ
7JN
230
8.8A
99
60JN
HEAN
(ug/1)
1. 7J
15JN
lJN
29.2
90JN
2JN
15.8
lOJN
5JN
lJN
8.2J
6.35
15
14.4
l.4J
4.2J
3.6
2.9J
19.9
2.9AJ
7JN
67.8
4. 75
99
60JN
1 Does not include duplicate samples. At locations where duplicate samples were collected. the highest value for the detected compound was used for this
sunu11arv.
(Footnotes continued next page)
4-72
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
2
3
The mean value was-calculated by averaging only the detected concentrations
for each compound. All non-detected results were not considered in this
determination.
ND -Indicates that the compound was not detected at the minimum
quantification limit.
4-73
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
METALS
Calcium
Iron
Magnesium
Potassium
Sodium
Aluminum
Barium
Cob a 11
Copper
Lead
Manganese
Nickel
Strontium
Yr.trium
Zinc
PESTICIDES/PCBS
Alpha-chlordane
Canuna -ch 1 ord en e
Heptachlor epoxide
EXTRACTABLE ORGANIC
COMPOUNDS
\
TABLE 4-6
P(JTABLE WELL SUMMARY TABLE
POTABLE WELL ANALYTICAL DATA
FCX-STATESVILLE REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION
STATESVILLE, NORIH CAROLINA
NUMBER OF
SAHPLES 1
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
NUMBER OF
DETECTS
3
1
3
3
3
1
2
1
3
1
2
1
3
1
3
1
1
1
RANGE
(mg/1)
3.3 12
ND 3 0.026
0.7 4.1
0.64 -3.3
1 . 1 -13
(ug/ 1)
ND
ND
l\1D
10
ND
ND
ND
8.0
ND
49
ND
ND
ND
-
-
76
350
4.0
16
16
48
8.5
37
4.6
170
0 025
0.028
0.028
Hethyl(methylpropenyl)-
c_vclopentane 3 1 ND -lJN
FOOTNOTES.
MEAN 2
(mg/1)
6.8
0.026
2.9
1. 75
6.4
(ug/1)
76
189
4.0
13.7
16
25.9
8.5
27
4.6
109. 7
0.025
0.028
0.028
lJN
1 Does nor include duplicate samples. Ar locar ions t-'here duplicate samples were
collected. the highest value for the derected compound was used for this
summary.
2
3
The mean value was calculated by averaging only the detected concentrations
for each compound. All non-detected results were not considered in this
determinat,ion.
ND -· Indicates that the compound was not detected at che minimum
quantification limit.
4 -7 t!
-- --- --- --- --- - - - - -
TABLE 4-7
ANALYTICAL DATA SUf-'MARY GROUND WATER, MONITORitlG WELLS FCX STATESVILLE REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION STATESVILLE. NORTH CAROLINA
FS-500 FS-521 FS-530 FS-501 rs-soz FS-531 rs-soJ FS-520 FS-520A rs-sos FS-504 FS-523 FS-522
WELL WELL WELL WELL WELL WELL WELL WELL WELL WELL WELL WELL WELL MW-4 MW-8 MW-3 MW-5S MW-SD MW-1 MW-2 M',,;1-2,DUP MW-7 MW-6S MW-6D MW-10 MW-9
06/04/91 07 /30/91 09/11/91 06/0t./9] 06/06/91 09/11/91 06/05/91 06/05/91 07/30/91 06/06/91 06/06/91 07/30/91 07/30/91 1 7t. 5 1435 1330 1600 1915 1320 1205 1230 1050 124 5 124 5 1700 163 5
'../ORGANIC ELEMENTS MG/ L MG/L MG/L MG/ L MGI L MG/L MG/L MG/L MG/L MG/L r-<;/L MG/L MG/L
CALCIUM 1.4 5.9 5. 1 2.0 24 1 .7 5. 0 4 g 3. 7 0.27 3. 4 8.2 7. 4
IRON 3.0 30 4 . 3 41 0. I 7 8 4 34 31 0. 92 17 0. 19 1.8 11 MAGNESIUM 1. 6 6. 1 4 .2 6.9 0.89 3 .3 11 11 5. 3 3.8 1. 1 4.3 5.8
POTASSIUM 2.9 3 3 2. 7 7. 6 3.2 3. 0 6.0 5.6 2. 5 4.2 1. 1 2. 3 3.1 SODIUM 11 50 6 .3 3. 1 11 2. 0 28 28 7 .9 39 4. 8 30 23
UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L · UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L
ALUMINUM 3800 26000 2300 14000 160 t.900 19000 19000 850 9400 54 2300 11000 BARIUM 140 200 140 230 10 88 350 340 90 170 7. 1 64 110 BERYLLIUM 6.8 1.5
CHROMIUM 3.4 84 7. 6 63 9.3 37 34 14 16 20 26 COBALT 8.5 3.6 20 6 4 23 22 15 18 9. 7 36 COPPER 4.8 4 1 10 59 16 52 48 6.2 26 7. 2 15 20
LEAD 11 18 29 29 13 13
MANGANESE 58 4 JO 160 790 350 1100 1000 420 600 6. 6 560 1500 NICKEL 34 9.2 42 13 28 25 22 19 35 38 STRONTIUM 26 120 42 21 180 24 120 120 42 4. 8 42 140 120 TITANIUM 170 550 110 680 5 3 250 740 680 22 610 41 210 VANADIUM 5.2 86 6.8 59 11 44 39 23 14 YTTRIUM j20 5. 2 62 9 8 38 36 6.4 68 13 42 ZINC 16 99 42 75 S.3 32 99 91 40 60 14 18 39
-:STJCIDE/PCB COMPOUNDS UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L
ALPHA-BHC
NA1 5. 4C 0.85 1. 7 0.3.:1 ALPHA-CHLORDANE 12 NA 0. 51 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA BETA-BHC 4 .BC 0.82 0. 19 0. 13 0.078 0.093J DELTA-BHC 2. 9C 0.33 0. 16 0. Ol 5J DIELDRIN 0. 13J 0. 038J 0.031 0.037] ENDRIN 0. 07.2J 0.061 0. Ot.7.J ENDR IN KETONE .:I. I 0 J2 0. 09:U 0 J~l 0.062J GAM1A-BHC (LINDANE) JGC l. BC 2.2C 0 I I
GN-NA-CHLORDANE /2 NA NA 0.36 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA OXYCHLORDANE (OCTACHLOREPOXIOE)/2 NA NA 0. 13 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA TRANS-NONACHLOR /2 NA NA 0. lOJN NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
-:TRACTABLE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L
1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE 1. 7J (METHYLPROPYL)OINITROPHENOL lOJN 20JN BJN 1 UNIDENTIFIED COMPOUND lOOJ
4-75
-- -- - - -
FS-500 FS-521 WELL WELL MW-4 MW-8
06/0li/91 07/30/91 1 7 t. 5 1i.35
EXTRACTABLE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS UG/L UG/L
2 UNIDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS BIS(DIMETHYLETHYL)METHYLPHENOL BROMACIL
BUTYLIDENEBIS((DIMETHYLETHYL)-
METHYL)PHENOL lOOJN
BUTYLIDENEBIS[(DIMETHYLETHYL)-
ETHYLPHENOL]
BUTYLIDENEBIS[(DIMETHYLETHYL)-
METHYLPHENOL)
DODECANOIC ACID
HEXADECANOIC ACID
NONANOIC ACID
PETROLEUM PRODUCT N
PURGEABLE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS UG/L UG/L
CM-AND/OR F-)XYLENE
1.1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE
I. I -DICHLOROETHANE 1,1-DICHLOROETHENE-
{1,1-DICHLOROETHYLENEJ BRot-ODICHLORCX'1ETHANE 1. 4J
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE 4.ZJ CHLOROFORM l_ 7J 10.0 CHLORCX'--1ETHANE CIS-1.2-DICHLOROETHENE
TETRACHLOROETHENE(TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
TRICHLOROETHENE{TRICHLOROETHYLENE) TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE 99 DIISOPROPYLETHER TRJCHLOROTRTFLUOROETHANE
............................................................. . .,.,.
''**FOOTNOTESf•**
A AVERAGE VALUE NA NOT ANALYZED
J ESTIMATED VALUE N PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED
C CONFIRMED BY GC/MS
-- --- ----- - -
TABLE 4-7 {Cont.)
ANALYTICAL DATA SUr-t-1ARY
GROUND WATER. MONITORING WELLS FCX-STATESVILLE REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION
STATESVILLE. NORTH CAROLI NA
FS-530 FS-501 F'S-502 FS-531 FS-503 FS-520 FS-520A FS-505 FS-504 FS-523 FS-522 WELL WELL WELL WELL WELL WELL WELL WELL WELL WELL WELL MW-3 MW-5S MW-5D MW-1 MW-2 MW-2,DUP MW-7 MW-6S MW-6D MW-10 MW-9 09/11 /91 06/04/91 06/06/91 09/11/91 06/05/91 06/05/91 07/30/91 06/06/91 06/06/91 07/30/91 07/30/91 1330 1600 1915 1320 1205 1230 1050 1245 124 5 1700 163 5
UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L
lOOJ lJN 6JN 20JN 4JN ZOJN 90JN lOJN
2JN
80JN ZOJN ZOJN ZOJN 3JN IOJN
5JN ,·
N ti ti N N N N N
UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L UG/L
8.ZJ
J.9J 7 . 1.,J 7.3J 1. IAJ 13J I ~.J 19J 13J J3J J3J
29 ZJJ 7.3J 7. ZJ 5.2 9. 1.,J
o _ )t,J 3. 9J 0. HAJ 4.ZAJ 3. BJ ~ . lJ
2.9J J3J 20J 19J 20 42 0.65J 0. 75J 110 230 52 52 20A 2. 3J 170 4.0J 0.88AJ 5.3J
7JN --' .. ---60JN
1 CHLORDANE CONSTITUENTS (COMPOUNDS INDICATED WITH ··12··) WERE NOT ANALYZED FOR WHEN NO TECHNICAL GRADE CHLORDANE WAS DETECTED IN SAMPLE. ../2 .. COMPOUNDS ARE ONLY
ANALYZED FOR WHEN TECHNICAL GRADE CHLORDANE IS DETECTED.
4-76
- --- ---
TABLE l.-8
ANALYTICAL DATA Sur-NA.RY POTABLE AND PROCESS WELLS FCX-STATESVILLE REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION STATESVILLE. NORTH CAROLINA
t<ORGANIC ELEMENTS
CALCIUM
IRON MAGNESIUM
POTASSIUM SODIUM
ALUMINUM BARIUM COBALT COPPER LEAD
MANGANESE NICKEL
STRONTIUM
TITANIUM
YTTRIUM
ZINC
~STICIDE/PCB COMPOUNDS
ALPHA-CHLORDANE 12 GAM'1A-CHLORDENE 12 HEPTACHLOR EPOXIDE
·'.TRACTABLE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
METHYL(METHYLPROPENYL)CYCLOPENTANE
l UNIDENTIFIED COMPOUND
2 UNIDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS
JRGEABLE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
1.2-DICHLOROPROPANE
CIS-1.2-DICHLOROETHENE
TETRACHLOROETHENE(TETRAC~LOROETHYLENE) TRICHLOROETHENE(TRICHLOROETHYLENE)
•*FOOTNOTES**" A AVERAGE VALUE
NA NOT ANALYZED J ESTIMATED VALUE
N PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED
FS-527 FS-526
MOOSE GA1NES WELL WELL
07/31/91 07/31/91
1400 1335
MG/L MG/L
5. I 3 .3
0 .026
3.9 0. 70
3.3 I . 3
13 I. I
UG/L UG/L
76
350 28
' . 0 I 5 16
,a 3.8
8.5
36 8.0
'. 6 ,g I 10
UG/L UG/L
0.025 NA
0.028 NA
0.028
UG/L UG/L
20J 70J
UG/L UG/L
---- -- --- --
FS-525 FS-524 JOHNSON C'tJATION
WELL WELL
07/31/91 07/31/91
1150 1045
MG/L MG/L
12 22
3. g
' . I s s
0. 6t. 3.'
5.0 II
UG/L UG/L
130
"
10
16
130
37 I 10
]]
I 7 0 ' . 0
UG/1. llG/L
NA NA !IA '"
UG/L UG/L
IJN IJN
90J J00J
UG/L UG/L
2.9AJ
L.. 2AJ
26A
8.8A
4-77
- ------
Well
ldent.ificat.ion ~
MW-1 6. 8
MW-2 4. 6
MW-3 5.
MW-4 5. 5
r1rl-5S 5. 3
!1w-5D 8 .8
MW-6S 4 . 7
MW-6D 6. 0
MW-7 4. 9
MW-8 6.
MW-9 5. 6
MW-10 5. 6
Carnat.ion 6. o5
Moose NM6
Gaines '· 05
Johnson 6. 8
-- -- --
TABLE ti-9 GROUND WATER INSJTU PARAMETER SLIM'iARYI
MONITORING WELLS, POTABLE WELLS AND CARNATION WELL
FCX-STATESVILLE REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION STATESVILLE. NORTH CAROLINA
S ,C. J Temp. t.
50 22. 0
250 18. 9
100 21 .D
90 18. 5
40 21. D
190 19. 0
230 18. 5
55 18. D
120 18. 5
270 21 .D
I 50 19. 0
240 19 5
190 19. D
130 19. D
30 19. D
l ID 21 .D
- - --- -
I Samples for event number one collected in June 1991 {MW-2. MW-t., MW-SS. Kw-5D, MW-6S, MW-6D), July 1991 (r-M-7, MW-8, MW-9, MW-10), and September 1991 (MW-I. MW-3).
2 Measurements in Standard Uni ts.
3 Specific conductance measurements in umhos/cm2 .
t. Temperature measurement in degrees Celcius c°C).
5 Measurement obtained with pH paper. Meter inoperable.
6 Measurement not taken.
4-78
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I •
I
I
I
r
4.2.1.2 Organic Compounds
The sample from MW-4 was analyzed for all Target Compound
List compounds. No pesticides were detected in the sample from
this location. One extractable organic compound, butylyidene-
bis((dimethylethyl)methyl)phenol, was presumed to be present at
an estimated concentration of 100 ug/1. The most significant
occurrence of organic compounds in the sample from this location
is that of trichlorofluoromethane, detected at a concentration of
99 ug/1. It was not detected in any of the other ground water
samples collected on-site during this phase of the investigation.
In addition, carbon tetrachloride and chloroform were also
reported and estimated to be present at concentrations of 4.2
ug/1 and 1.7 ug/1, respectively. Of the two, chloroform was the
only compound detected in samples from other monitoring wells.
4.2.2 on-Site Monitoring Wells
4.2.2.1 Metals
The results of analyses of samples from on-site monitoring
wells were evaluated by comparing the detected concentrations at
each well versus to the mean concentrations for a particular
metal for all samples comprising the monitoring system at the
site. The mean concentrations are found in Table 4-5. In
addition, the results were evaluated to determine which samples
contained metals concentrations exceeding National Interim
Primary Drinking Water Standards.
Wells MW-8, MW-5S, MW-2, and to lesser extents, MW-6S and
MW-9, can be characterized as generally having the greatest
number of different metals which are also present at the highest
concentrations, i.e, above the mean concentration, relative to
samples from other wells in the system. The wells with the
highest concentrations, taken collectively, do not represent any
4-79
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
particular pattern across the site, as wells with significantly
-fewer compounds found at lower concentrations are found
interspersed with them, particularly across the western half of
the site. One occurrence may be significant, however. The
samples containing the highest concentrations of chromium were
detected' at wells MW-8 and MW-5S, where concentrations of 84 ug/1
and 63 ug/1, respectively, were detected. These exceed the
drinking water standard for chromium (VI) of 50 ug/1. These
wells are located in the general area where the highest
concentrations of chromium were detected in soil samples
collected for the investigation.
Another observation was made upon review of the metals data.
The water contained in the fractured bedrock zone monitored by
the two deep monitoring wells, MW-5D and MW-6D, is generally of a
higher quality than water contained in the sa~urated residuum
monitored by the shallow wells. Fewer metals were generally
detected in the bedrock wells and they are generally present at
much lower concentrations in the deep well than in the shallower
wells.
4.2.2.2 Pesticide/PCB Compounds
With the exception of an estimated concentration of 0.62
ug/1 endrin ketone, detected in the sample from well MW-6S, all
of the pesticide compounds detected in samples from on-site
monitoring wells were detected in a cluster of monitoring wells
comprised of shallow wells MW-3, MW-5S, MW-1 and MW-2 and deep
well MW-5D. The sequence indicated for the shallow wells
represents their relative and sequential locations on site,
beginning at well MW-3 and progressing east to well MW-2. It
also represents the pattern of occurrence with respect to
observed concentrations of most of the pesticides detected in the
samples from these wells. With few exceptions, the highest
concentration for any pesticide compound was detected in the
4-80
\
I
I
••
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I ,~
I
I"
I
I
i
I \. -,
f
sample from well MW-3. Concentrations generally decreased from
-one well to the next, moving east across the site. The
concentrations for most pesticides detected in the deep well, MW-
5D, were generally intermediate
for the
within the-observed range of
shallow wells. Figure 4-21 shows concentrations reported
the detected pesticides and their concentrations at each of the
monitoring wells sampled for the investigation.
In order of decreasing concentrations, the pesticides
detected in these samples were lindane (gamma-BHC), alpha-BHC,
beta-BHC, endrin ketone, delta-BHC, chlordane and its
constituents (alpha-chlordane, gamma-chlordane, oxychlordane, and
trans-nonachlor), endrin and dieldrin. The individual BHC
compounds and endrin ketone were the only pesticide compounds
detected at concentrations exceeding 1 ug/1. -
Lindane concentrations ranged from 0.17 ug/1, in the sample
from well MW-1, to 16.0 ug/1, in the sample from well MW-3.
Alpha-BHC concentrations ranged from 0.33 ug/1, in the sample
from well MW-1, to 5.4 ug/1, in the sample from well MW-3. Beta-
BHC concentrations ranged from an estimat'ed o. 093 ug/1, in the
sample from well MW-2, to 4.8 ug/1, in the sample from well MW-3.
Endrin ketone concentrations ranged 0.093 ug/1, in the sample
from well MW-5D, to 3.1 ug/1, in the sample from well MW-3.
Delta-BHC concentrations ranged from 0.031 ug/1, in the sample
from well MW-2, to 2.9 ug/1, in the sample from well MW-3.
The remaining pesticides were not only detected at lower
concentrations but also had a different pattern of occurrence.
Chlordane and its constituents were detected only in the sample
from well MW-3, which contained the highest concentrations of
other pesticides. Endrin was found only in the samples collected
at wells MW-1 and MW-2, towards the eastern edge of the pesticide
plume. Dieldrin was generally present all across the pesticide
4-81
----- --- - --
BURLINGTON
INDUSTRIES
" I
" I
"
Alpho-BHC -5.4C us11'1
B•to-BHC -4.8 ugjl
Chlordane -1.1 u9/I
Ddto-BHC -2.9 u9/I
01-ldrln -0.13 uo/l
Endrln KetOM -3.1 ugl'
Commo-BHC (Undone) -18 u9/I
Alpha-BHC -0.85 ug/1
Beta-BHC -0.62 ug/J
Oeilto-BHC -O.JJ ug/1
DlelO'"ln -0.0Je ug/1
Endrln Ketone -0.32 ug/1
Gomma-BHC {Undone) -1.8 ug/1
Alpho-BHC -0.JJ ug/1
Beta-BHC -0.13 ug/1
Otilto-BHC -0.015 ug/1
Endrln -0.022 ug/l
Enc!Ttn Ketone -0.39 ug/1
Commo-BHC (Undone) -0.17 ug/1
Alpho-BHC -1.7 ug/1
Beto-BHC -0.19 ug/1
Dlrlta-BHC -0.16 ug/1
Endrln Ketone -0.093 ug/1
Gommo-BHC (Undone) -2.2 ug/1
FIGURE 4-21
PESTICIDE CONCENTRATIONS, MONITORING WELLS
FCX-STA TESVILLE REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION
STATESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA
----- --
KEY
8 -EPA 'l'l£LLS INST,&,U,£0 FOR THIS STUDY
A -F.C. HART STUDY
• -CARNATION YtUL
(8 -EPA REMOVAL YIO.LS
NOTt:
CH..OROANE ~c:&ml:ATIONS ARE TOTAL
~ AU. CONSTinJENTS.
SOME DATA £STIWAT[0 ~
OlHER'MSE QJAI.JnED. Pl.EASE
SEI DATA SUMMARY T"81..£S.
APPROXIMATE SCALE
( IN FEET )
Inch • 125 ft.
52.5
:
12'
:
&EPA
-
I
I plume, based on the data, does not appear to be present in well
MW-1 nor the deep well, MW-SD.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Several observations can be made based on these data. The
concentrations detected appear to correlate well with water
solubilities of the different compounds. Those with the higher
water solubilities, lindane, alpha-BHC and beta-BHC, are the
compounds detected at the highest concentrations. Accordingly,
the DDT compounds, with their considerably lower water
solubilities, are not present at detectable concentrations in
ground water at the monitored locations. The pattern of
occurrence, when evaluated with the ground water contour map in
Figure 3-3, appears to indicate a source near the southwestern
corner of the site. Prior to expansion of the site into the
western end of the existing developed area, this area of the ~ite
was,occupied by a large house with a nearby deep, bored or dug
well. Allegations were made during the investigation that, prior
to demolition of some of the older site buildings and prior to
construction of the current site buildings in this area, the bore
of the well was used to dispose of various liquid and powdered
pesticides, resulting in the direct emplacement of these
materials into the ground water system. If this is true, it
could explain the observed occurrences. Additionally, the only
compounds detected in the bedrock system monitored by well MW-SD
were the BHC compounds and endrin ketone.
4.2.2.3 Extractable Organic Compounds
Nine identified and four unidentified extractable organic
compounds were detected in samples from most wells across the
site. The majority of these compounds are either butylidenebis
methyl phenols or fatty acids.· No compounds were detected at
concentrations exceeding 100 ug/1. The only possibly significant
occurrence is bromacil, an herbicide, identified based on
4-83
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
presumptive evidence at all of the shallow well locations east of
well MW-1, except well MW-9.
4.2.2.4 Purgeable Organic ~ompounds
Fourteen purgeable organic compounds were detected in
samples collected from on-site monitoring wells. These data are
displayed in Figure 4-22. With the exception of diisopropyl
ether and xylene, all of the detected compounds are chlorinated
purgeable hydrocarbons. Two different contaminant patterns are
present.
The first and least significant ''pattern'' is the occurrence
of trichlorofluoromethane, detected in the sample from well MW-4
at~ concentration of 99 ug/1. Carbon tetrachloride was also
detected at an estimated concentration of 4.2 ug/1. This was the
only location at which these compounds were found, suggesting a
source other than FCX.
The most significant purgeable organic compound
contamination observed is that due to the presence of
tetrachloroethylene and associated degradation products,
including cis-1,2-dichloroethene and trichoroethylene, as well as
other compounds, 1,1-dichloroethene, 1,1-dichloroethane and
1,1,1-trichloroethane. These compounds, with few exceptions,
form an association of compounds found at shallow wells MW-1, MW-
2 and MW-9 and at both deep wells, MW-5D and MW-6D. The shallow
wells are all located in the central third of the site. Wells
MW-3 and MW-5S, located west of the severest contamination, and
well MW-10, east of the contamination, were found to contain low
concentrations of tetrachloroethylene and no measurable
conr.entrations of the other associated compounds.
Tetrachloroethylene was detected at concentrations of 230
ug/1, 52 ug/1 and 170 ug/1, respectively, in wells MW-1, MW-2 and
4-84
---
Ccrbon Tetrochlorlde -4.2J ug/1
Chloroform -1.7J ug/1 Trlchlorofluorom,thane -99 ug/1
-
~ MW-4
- - - -- -
BURLINGTON
INDUSTRIES
--
Bromkllchlon:,m•lhm11 -1.4J ug/1 /
LC~h_lo,~of~om,=---'-10.C,,0'--"u-"g/lcc._ ____ ..., '< 1,1,1-trlchloroethon, -BJ u9/I
I
Bu
1,1,1-trlchloroethau, -7.4J u9/I
1,1-dlchloroethane -1JJ u9/I
1,1-dlchloroethene -7.3 ug/1
cie-1,2-dichloroelhone -20 u9/I
Tetrochloroeth)4er,e -52 ug/1
(m-and/or p-)x:,len• -8.2J ug/1
1,1-dlchloroethane -t9J ug/1
1,1-dlehlOf"oeth~en• -21J ug/l
de-1,2-dlchloroethone -20J ug/1
tetrochloroath)'leno -2.30 ug/l
1,1,1-trlchl«oethaie -3.9J ug/1
1,1-dfchloroethone -1~ ug/l
,1-dlchloroethone -29 ug/1
cls-1,2-dlchloroethene -1JJ ug/1
Tetrachlorneth)'l•n• -110 ug/1
Trichloroeth)'lene -4.0J ug/1
FIGURE 4-22
1, 1-dlchloroelhon• -13J ug/1
1,1-dlchloroethene -9.4J ug/1
Chl01"oform -4.1J ug/1
Chloromethone -2.9J ug/1
cls-1,2-dlchloroethene -42 ug/1
Tetrochloroeth)llene -170 ug/1
Trlchloroeth)4ene -5.3.J uo/1
Trlehlorotrt!luoroethane -60..N ug/1
-!-
1,1,1-trlehlOl"oethane -7.4J ug/1
1, 1-dichlorocthar,e -UJ ug/l
111-dlchloroeth)hme -7.3.J ug/l c ~1,2-dlchloroethene -20 ug/l Tetrochloroeth)'lene -52 ug/1 V
PURGEABLE ORGANIC COMPOUND CONCENTRATIONS◊
MONITORING WELLS
FCX-STA TESVILLE REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION
STATESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA ◊
◊
- - -- -
w
9 -EPA WELLS INSTALLED FOR THIS STUDY
A -r.c. HART STUDY
♦ -CARNATION VtEl...L
8 -EPA REMOVAL Vt£lL.S
J -ESTIMATED VALUE
N -PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE
A -AVERAGE VALUE
APPROXIMATE SCALE
1125 0 k----' --( IN FEET )
Inch -125 ft.
62.5
:
125
I
~EPA
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
MW-9. The sample from bedrock monitoring well MW-SD, located
near the center of the site, was found to contain tetrachloro-
ethylene at a concentration of 110 ug/1. The concentration in
the sample from bedrock well MW-6D, however, was significantly
lower, with a reported concentration of only 20 ug/1. The
associated compounds were also found in the same relative
proportions. The maximum concentration for any of the compounds,
however, did not exceed 30 ug/1. Most were present at less than
20 ug/1.
Concentrations of chloroform and other trihalomethane
compounds were present in many of the wells. Some of the
occurrences, particularly in samples from the new monitoring
wells, MW-7, MW-8, MW-9 and MW-10, may be relicts of the potable
water used to p+ace the sand pack durin9 well construction.
Levels of chloroform in future samples from these wells should be
evaluated to determine if the levels are being reduced. At the
same time, levels of other constituents should be evaluated to
determine if they are increasing, indicating that possible
dilution effects, attributable to the introduction of potable
water, are diminishing. The occurrences of chloroform in the
older wells, all at concentrations below 2.0 ug/1, may be due to
other causes or sources.
4.2.3 Carnation Well
The sample from the Carnation process well, west of the
site, was significant for the presence of purgeable organic
compounds only. These data are shown in Figure 4-22 with the
purgeable organic results for the on-site wells. The metals
detected were within background ranges. No pesticides were
detected and only one extractable organic compound,
methyl(methylpropenyl)cyclopentane, was identified and estimated
to be present, based on presumptive evidence only, at a
concentration of 1 ug/1.
4-86
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
The sample contained tetrachloroethylene and its degradation
product, cis-1,2-dichloroethene, at concentrations of 26 ug/1 and
an estimated 4.2 ug/1, respectively. It also contained
trichloroethene, at a concentration of 8.B_ug/1, and 1,2-
dichloropropane, at a concentration of 2.9 ug/1.
4.2.4 Potable Wells
Three potable wells, the Moose, Gaines and Johnson
residential wells, were sampled. The Moose and Gaines' wells are
shallow, bored wells; the Johnson well is a deep, drilled well.
The only significant sample results for these wells was the
occurrence of two chlordane isomers and heptachlor epoxide, all
below 0.03 ug/1, in the sample from the Moose well. Earlier
sampling by the county had also indicated the presence of
chlordane in this well. Based on its location and distance from
the site, it is not likely that the contamination can be
attributed to the site and may be due to termiticide application
to the structure surrounding the well bore. Heptachlor epoxide
was not detected in any of the samples containing chlordane or
any of its consti~uents collected from the site.
4.3 Sediment
Eight sediment samples were collected and analyzed for the
investigation. These samples were collected from locations on or
immediately adjacent to the site and from locations presumed to
be beyond the possible or expected influence of the site, both
north and south of the drainage divide oi which the site is
located. The analytical results for these samples are discussed
in the following paragraphs. Table 4-10 is the sample summary
containing the frequency of detection, range of concentrations
and mean concentrations for these samples. The analytical data
are summarized in Table 4-11. The complete data are included in
4-87
I
I TABLE 4-10
SEDIHENT SAffPLE SUHHARY
I FCX-STAIESVILLE REHEDIAJ,, INVESTIGAIION
STAIESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA
I NUHBER OF NUHBER OF
HETALS SAHPLES1 DETECTS RANGE HEAN2
(mg/kg) (mg/kg)
I Aluminum 11 11 2,400 -21,000 11,890
Arsenic 11 2 3.3) -3.3J 3.3J
Barium 11 11 22 -160 65.8
I Calcium 11 11 210 -6,400 1,425.5
Chromium 11 11 16 -79 40 .3
Cobalr 11 3 ND 3 -64 45
Copper 11 5 30 -73 40.8 I Iron 11 11 7,100 -95,000 33,536
Lead 11 11 3.2) -95 29.1
Magnesium 11 11 260 -2,900 1,075 .5
I Manganese 11 11 77 -1 .100 3 78. 8
Mercury 11 1 ND -0 .10 0 .10
Nickel 11 11 2.8 74 14.5
I Por.assium 11 11 300 2,400 815.5
Selenium 11 8 ND 6.3 2.4
Sodium 11 1 ND 380 380
Sr.rontium 1 1 9.0 9.0
I Titanium 1 1 420 420
Vanadium 11 11 18 -170 80
Yttrium 1 1 6 .2 6 .2
I Zinc 11 7 43 430 169.4
PESTICIDES/PCBS (ug/kg) (ug/kg)
I 4. 4 '-DDD 11 2 ND 83 62.5
4. 4 · -DDE 11 1 ND 28 28
4. 4 ': DDT 11 2 ND 150 82.5
I Dieldrin 11 2 ND 36 23.5
Endr in 11 1 ND 370J 370J
PCB-1254 11 1 ND 760 760
I Ganu11a-chlordane 11 1 ND 37 37
Alpha-chlordane 11 1 ND 26 26
Cis-nonachlor 11 1 ND 3.8JN 3.8JN
Trans-nonachlor 11 1 ND 22N 22N I EXTRACTABLE ORGANIC
COHPOUNDS
I Benzo(a)anchracene 11 1 ND 200J 200J
Benzo(b/k)fluoranrhene 11 1 ND 190J 190J
I Bis(2-erhylhexyl)-
phthalare 11 ND 34.000 34,000
I 4-88
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
i I
I
\
TABLE 4-10 (Cont.)
RISK ASSESSHENT SUHHARY TABLE
SEDIHENT ANALYTlCAL DAIA
FCX-STAIESVILLE REHEDIAL INVESTIGAIION
STAIESVILLE, NORI// CAROLINA
EXTRACTABLE ORGANIC NUHBER OF NUHBER OF
COHPOUNDS SAHPLES DETECTS RANGE HEAN
(mg/kg) (mg/kg)
Chrysene 11 1 ND 190J 190J
Fluoranthene 11 3 ND 790J 453.3
Phenanthrene 11 2 ND 590J 370
Pyrene 11 3 ND 530J 350
PURGEABLE ORGANIC
COHPOUNDS
1, 2-Dichloroethene 11 1 ND 24J 24J
Trichloroethene 11 1 ND 44 44
FOOTNOTES:
1 Does not include duplicate samples. Ar: Jocat ions where duplicate samples were
collected, r:he highest value for the detected compound was used for this
summary.
2
3
The mean value was calculated by averaging only the detected concentrations
for each compound. All non-der:ected results were not considered in this
determination.
ND -Indicates thar: the compound was nor detected.at the minimum
quantification .limit.
4-89
----- --- - -- - ---- ---
TABLE4·ll
ANALYTICAL DATA SUr-t1ARY
SEDIMENT SAMPLES FCX-STATESVILLE STATESVILLE. NORTH CAROLINA
FS-ioOO FS-401 FS-402 FS-407 FS-408 FS-409 FS-020 FS-403 FS-40ti FS-406 FS-410 FS-405 DITCH W NE CORN. DITCH E N DRAIN. N DRAIN, N DRAIN. HEAD OF S TRIB. S TRIB .. THIRD CK DUPE OF THIRD CK OF PHOEN OF PAD OF PHOEN W TRIB. GARDEN POND S TRIB. BRISTOL DAVIS PR □'STREAM FS-406 U'STREAM 06/0li/91 06/04/91 06/Qi., /91 06/04/91 06/0L./91 06/04/91 09/11/91 06/04/91 06/0L./91 06/0li/91 06/04/91 06/0li/91 1300 1310 1250 0955 0925 0835 IOt.0 1415 1310 0950 1020 0850
NORGANIC ELEMENTS MG/KG MG/KG MG/KG MGIKG MG/KG MG/KG M3/KG MG/KG t1:i/KG MG/KG MG/KG MG/KG
ALUMINUM 21000 17000 2700 16000 18000 2900 15000 15000 5200 Zt.00 3000 15000 ANTIMONY 4 6UR 3.4UR t.. lUR f,. 7UR ZlUR t,. 3UR 4 .6UR 3. 7UR 4.2UR 3. SUR 4. lUR ARSENIC 3.JJ 3.JJ
BARIUM 33 68 39 SE 160 22 7l 72 " 30 32 130 CALCIUM 810 6400 ,so 770 2500 3, 0 1900 1000 5'0 210 '50 ,go CHRCX'-1IUM 79J 3BJ 32J i.2J '9J 19J 39 '5J 21J 39J 16J ,oJ COBALT 5, 58 13 COPPER 31J 30J 37J 73J 33 IRON 55000 38000 i.JOOO 32000 95000 7100 2i.ooo 26000 14000 9100 9800 25000 LEAD 2,J 'lJ 1 SJ 28J 31J 6.7J 95 5'J 12J 4. 4J 3.2J 9.5J MAGNESIUM '10 1500 260 "0 1900 660 14 00 790 900 ,50 670 2900 MANGANESE IJOJ 220J llOJ 180J 730J 77J 1100 520J 280J 330J 280J 490J MERCURY 0. JO NICKEL 5.2 11 3.' 6.:; 21 6. 5 " 10 6 2. 8 3 11 POTASSIUM ,oo 1300 ,20 ,oo 1300 520 780 390 5,0 300 520 2400 SELENIUM 1. 3J 1. 7J 2.3-1 l. ~UR 6. JJ 2.7J 1. 4J l.3J l.ZJ 2.ZJ SODIUM 380 STRONTIUM NA NA NA flA NA NA 9.0 NA NA NA NA NA TITANIUM NA NA NA NP.. NA NA ,20 NA NA NA NA NA VANADIUM g, 69 72 90 170 18 66 77 38 22 26 69 YTTRIUM NA NA /IA /IA /IA NA 6.2 NA NA NA /IA NA ZINC I30J 430J 9'.,j ZlOJ 230 ,aJ ,3J
-:STICIDE/PCB COMPOUNDS llG/KG UG/KG UG/KG \IG/KC, UGll<G UG/KG LJG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG
4,4'-DDD (P.P'-DOD) 63 t.2N 4,4'-DDE (P.P'-DDE) 28 4,4'-DDT (P,P'-DDT) 150 !SJ DIELDRIN 36 l lJ ENDRIN 370J PCB-1254 (AROCLOR 12)4) 1r,o GAf-NA-CIJLORDANE n. 31 TRANS-NONACHLOR /2 22N ALPHA-CHLORDANE /2 26 CIS-NONACHLOR /2 3.SJN OP-DDT 13JN
:TRACTABLE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG
2,4-DINITROTOLUENE 970UR SOOUR 850UR 1700UR 3600UR 870UR llOOUR 830UR 870UR 850UR !ODOUR BENW(A)ANTHRACENE 200 J BENW(B AND/OR K)FLUORANTHENE 190J BIS(2-ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE 34000
CHRYSENE 190 J FLUORANTHENE 790 J 250J 320 J PHENANTHRENE 590 J 150 J PYRENE 530 J 200J 320 J 2 UNIDENTIFIED Ccx-1POUNDS lOOOOJ 5 UNIDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS 60000J
4-90
--- --
iRGEABLE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
1.2-DICHLOROETHENE (TOTAL) TRICHLOROETHENE(TRICHLOROETHYLENE)
-r.-rooTNOTES**"
NA NOT ANALYZED J ESTIMATED VALUE
-
MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED
-
FS-400 DITCH W
OF PHOEN
06/0li/91
1300
UG/KG
-
FS-401
NE CORN.
OF PAD
06/0lo/91
1310
UG/KG
--
TABLE 4-11 (Cont.)
ANALYTICAL DATA SUl'-t1A.RY
SEDIMENT SAMPLES
FCX-STATESVI LLE
STATESVILLE. NORTH CAROLINA·
FS-402 FS-407 FS-408
DITCH E N DRAIN, N DRAIN,
OF PHOEN W TRIB. GARDEN
06/04/91 06/0li/91 06/04/91
1250 0955 0925
UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG
2, J
"
U MATERIAL WAS ANALYlED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED THE NUMBER IS THE MINlMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT
R QUALITY CONTROL INDICATES THAT DATA ARE UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT
-
FS-i.Qg
N DRAJN.
POND
06/04/91
0835
UG/KG
RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION. THE VALUE IS THAT REPORTED BY THE LABORATORY
4-91
----
FS-020 FS-403 FS-404 FS-Li06 FS-410 FS-405
HEAD OF S TRIB. S TRIB. THIRD CK DUPE OF THIRD CK S TRIB. BRISTOL DAVIS PR D'STREAM FS-406 U'STREAM
09/11/91 06/04/91 06/0t./91 06/Ql,/91 06/04/91 06/QG/9}
1040 1415 1310 0950 1020 0850
l!G/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG UG/KG
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
••
I
Appendix B. The sample locations and descriptions are in Table
2-2.
4.3.1 Metals
Because of extreme variations that can occur naturally for
various metals in sediment, care must be used in evaluating the
results. Hydraulic conditions alone may create great differences
in sediment samples from the same stream, where these conditions
cause significant variation in the relative proportions of sand
versus clay or silt fractions in the sample. As such, a large
range of values for metals associated with the common rock-
forming minerals in a given area can be expected.
The eleven most frequently detected metals were found in all
eleven samples collected. These are, in order of decreasing
concentration, iron, aluminum, calcium, magnesium, potassium,
manganese, vanadium, barium, lead, chromium, and nickel. Each of
these metals were among the most frequently detected and wide-
spread of the metals found in soil samples collected over the
site and, at the concentrations· reported, are probably repre-
sentative of background conditions.
Of the remaining metals detected in sediment samples
selenium, zinc, copper, cobalt, arsenic, sodium, mercury,
titanium, strontium, and yttrium -only arsenic appe~rs to have a
strong possible relationship to past site activities. It is
present in two samples, collected at stations FS-401-SD and FS-
402-SD, at an estimated concentration of 3.3 mg/kg at each
station. The pattern of occurrence indicates that the arsenic
originated on-site and has migrated via a ditch and culvert at
least as far as the ditch located north of the railroad tracks
and east of Phoenix Street. Figure 4-23 shows the locations of
the samples in which arsenic was detected. Additional sampling
4-92
----- ----
0 125
Scale, feet
* Sediment sample only at these locations
Figure 4-23
Arsenic in seallllent
FCX-Statesville Remedial Investigation
Statesville, North Carolina
-• N
------ -- -
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
would be required to further characterize the extent of arsenic
contamination in this ditch, if warranted.
4.3.2 Pesticides/PCBs
Of the eleven sediment samples collected, pesticide
compounds were detected in two samples and PCB-1254 was detected
in a third and unrelated sample. The sample containing the PCB
compound was collected from the residential pond located north of
the site at station FS-409-SD. It was detected at a concen-
tration of 760 ug/kg. These data are shown in Figure 4-24.
The sample from station FS-401-SD, located directly
adjacent to the concrete pad east of the warehouse, contained
DOD, DOE, and DDT, as well as dieldrin and endrin. Of the three
DDT-related compounds, DDT was, present at the highest concen-
tration, 150 ug/kg. Dieldrin and endrin were present at 36 ug/kg
and an estimated 370 ug/kg, respectively.
The sediment sample collected at the head of the unnamed
tributary south of the site contained a large number of pesticide
compounds, including DDT, ODD, DOE, dieldrin and various
chlordane-related compounds. The total concentration of the DDT-
related compounds is 58 ug/kg, ODD being the major constituent.
The total concentration of chlordane-related compounds is 88.8
ug/kg, gamma-and alpha-chlordane being the major constituents.
Endrin was estimated to be present at a concentration of 11
ug/kg.
4.3.3 Extractable Organic Compounds
Extractable organic compounds were detected and identified
at three sediment sampling locations, shown in Figure 4-25. At
two other locations, north of the site, several unidentified
compounds were reported. This discussion will concentrate on the
4-94
----- ---L
Seals, feet
* Sediment sample only at these locations
KEY:
J -Estimated Concentration
N -Presumptive Evidence
Figure 4-24
-
Pesticide Compounds in Sediment
FCX-Statesville Remedial Investigation
Statesville, North Carolina
-- - - - -- ---
c<:::I
--------
125 0 125 -~---Scale, feet
* Sadirnent sample only at these locations
KEY:
J -Estimated Concentration
N Presumptive Evidence
Figure 4-25
--
Extractable Organic Compounds in Sediment FCX-Statesville Remedial Investigation
Statesville, North Carolina
----
Benzo(B end/or k)Fluoranthene -190J ug/kg
Fluoranthene -2SOJ ug/kg
Pyrene -200J ug/kg
----
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
locations at which the identified compounds, primarily PAH
compounds, were reported.
The sample from FS-400-SD contained bis(2-ethylhexyl)ph-
thalate at a concentration of 34,000 ug/kg. It also contained
three PAH compounds -fluoranthene, phenanthrene and pyrene -at
estimated concentrations of 790 ug/kg, 590 ug/kg and 530 ug/kg,
respectively. This sample was collected from the ditch which
runs between the north side of the railroad tracks and Burlington
Industries. The sample from FS-020-SD, located at the head of
the unnamed tributary to Third Creek contained benzo(B and/or
K)fluoranthene, fluoranthene and pyrene, at estimated concen-
trations of 190 ug/kg, 250 ug/kg and 200 ug/kg, respectively.
The other sample containing PAH compounds was collected at
station FS-406-SD in the duplicate from this station, identified
as FS-410-SD. This station is located immediately below the
confluence of Third Creek and the unnamed tributary sampled for
the investigation. An asphalt paving plant is located just
upstream from the confluence with the tributary. Five compounds
were detected at concentrations ranging from 150 ug/kg to 320
ug/kg.
4.3.4 Purgeable Organic Compounds
Purgeable organic compounds were detected in only one of the
sediment samples collected for this investigation. 1,2-dichloro-
ethene, estimated to be present at 24 ug/kg, and trichloro-
ethene, detected at a concentration of 44 ug/kg, were found in
the sample from FS-408-SD, located near the seep north of
·Burlington Industries (see Figure 4-26).
4.4 Surface Water
Eleven (11) surface water samples, described in Table 2-2,
were collected to characterize the nature and extent of contam-
4-97
---
0 ---=-scale, feet
125
-- --
* S2diment sample only at these locations
KEY:
J -Estimated Concentration
N -'Presumptive Evidence
Figure 4-26
Purgeable Organic Compounds in Sediment FCX-Statesville Remedial Investigation Statesville, North Carolina
-
it
N
-
<1
----- ---
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
ination at the FCX-Statesville site. Table 4-12 is the sample
summary containing the number of detects, the range of concen-
trations and the mean concentration for each of the compounds
that were detected in at least one sample .. Table 4-13 is the
analytical data summary for these samples. The complete data is
located in Appendix B. The samples are described in Table
2-1.
4.4.1 Metals
Eighteen metals were detected in surface water samples
collected for the investigation. Eleven of these -calcium,
iron, magnesium, potassium, sodium, aluminum, barium, manganese,
strontium, titani~m and zinc -were detected in each of the
samples. The remaining metals -chromium, cobalt, copper,
nickel, vanadium and/or yttrium~ were detected in up to seven of
the samples, all at concentrations below 100 ug/1.
4.4.2 Pesticides
Pesticides were detected in only one surface water sample,
FS-020, located immediately south of the site and shown in Figure
4-27. Alpha-chlordane, gamma-chlordane, dieldrin and trans-
nonachlor were all detected or estimated to be present at
concentrations less than 0.05 ug/1.
4.4.3 Extractable Organic Compounds
There were only two extractable organic compounds detected
in surface water samples collected for the investigation.
Cyclodecanol and hexadecanoic acid were both reported, based on
presumptive evidence of the compounds, at estimated
concentrations of 10 ug/1 and 4 ug/1, respectively, for the
sample collected at station FS-407.
4-99
I
I TABLE 4-12
SURFACE WATER SA!1PLE SUMMARY
FCX-STATESVILLE REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION
I STATESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA
NUMBER OF NUMBER OF
I METALS SA!1PLES 1 DETECTS RANGE MEAN2
(mg/1) (mg/I)
Calcium 8 8 5.1 14 9.4
I Iron 8 8 0.2 110 18.3
Magnesium 8 8 2 -6 3.5
Potassium 8 8 1.9 6 2.6
I Sodium 8 8 2.9 22 7.2
(ug/1) (ug/1)
I Aluminum 8 8 190 . 12.000 3686.2
·Barium 8 8 31 -240 73. 2
Chromium 8 7 ND 3 -25 10
I Cobalt 8 3 ND 42 17 .2
Copper 8 5 ND 28 12.1
Lead 8 2 ND 28 23.5
I Manganese 8 8 12 3,300 574 .4
Nickel 8 2 ND 20 13.8
Strontium 8 8 32 200 54.6
Titanium 8 8 6.5 . 590 148.7
I Vanadium 8 7 ND -86 27. 8
Yttrium 8 1 ND -4.1 4.1
Zinc 8 8 2.6 . 160 52.7
I PESTICIDES/PCBS
Alpha-chlordane 8 1 ND 0 014) 0.014) I Gamma-chlordane 8 1 ND 0.012J 0.012)
Dieldrin 8 1 ND 0. 036 0.036
TranS-nonachlor 8 1 ND 0.009 0.009
I EXTRACTABLE ORGANIC
COMPOUNDS
I Cyclodecanol 8 1 ND lOJN lOJN
Hexadecanoic acid 8 1 ND 4JN 4JN
I PURGEABLE ORGANIC
COMPOUND
I 1,2-Dichloropropane 8 1 ND 7. 2. T 7.2J
Benzene 8 1 ND 1. IJ l. IJ
Carbon Disulfide 8 2 ND l.4J 1.35)
I Chloromethane 8 1 ND 0. 61J 0. 61J
I 4-100
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
\
PURGEABLE
ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
cis-1,2-Dichloroethane
Tetrachloroethene
TABLE 4-12 (Cont.)
SURFACE WATER SA/iPLE SUHHARY
FCX-STATESVILLE REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION
STATESVILLE, NORI/I CAROLINA
NUMBER OF NUMBER OF
SA/iPLES DETECTS RANGE
(ug/ 1)
8 1 ND 45
8 3 ND 98 trans-1,2-Dichloroethane 8 1 ND 3.3J
Trichloroethene 8 1 ND 63
FOOTNOTES:
HEAN
(ug/1)
45
33.6
3.3J
63
1 Does nor include duplicate samples. At locacions where duplicate samples were collected, the highest value for the detected compound was used for this summarv.
2
3
The mean value was
for each compound.
determination.
calculated by averaging only the detected concentrations
All non-detected results were not considered in this
ND -Indicates that the compound was not detected at the minimum
quantification limit.
4 -· l OJ
---
INORGANIC ELEMENTS
CALCIUM
IRON MAGNESIUM
POTASSIUM
SODIUM
ALUMINUM
BARIUM CHROMIUM
COBALT COPPER
LEAD
MANGANESE NICKEL STRONTIUM
TITANIUM VANADIUM YTTRIUM
ZINC
PESTICIDE/PCB COMPOUNDS
ALPHA-CHLORDANE
DI ELDRIN GAtt1A-CHLORDANE
TRANS-NONACHLOR
-
/2
/2
/2
EXTRACTABLE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
CYCLODODECANOL (2 ISOMERS)
HEXADECANOIC ACID
PURGEABLE ORGANIC CCNPOUNDS
1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE
BENZENE
CARBON DISULFIDE CHLORor1ETHANE
-
CIS-1,2-DICHLOROETHENE
TETRACHLOROETHENE(TETRACHLOROETHYLENE) TRANS-1,2-0ICHLOROETHENE TRICHLOROETHENE(TRICHLOROETHYLENE)
"'**FOOTNOTES***
-- - --
TABLE 4-13
ANALYTICAL DATA SUM'1ARY
SURFACE WATER SAMPLES
FCX-STATESVILLE REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION
STATESVILLE. NORTH CAROLINA
'FS-407
NORTH
OF SITE
06/04/91
0950
r-<;/L
6.8
27
2.0
1.9
4. 6
UG/L
12000
100
22
6.8
24
28
670
7. 6
32
360
57
4. 1
110
UG/1.
UG/L
lOJN
4JN
UG/L
1.3J
FS-t.08
NORTH
OF SITE
06/0li/91
0920
r-<;/ L
12
110
3.9
2. 1
22
UG/L
11000
2'0
25
42
28
19
3300
90
590 es
87
UG/l.
UC.IL
UG/L
7.2J
45
98
3.JJ
63
FS-409
NORTH
OF SITE
06/04/91
0830
r-<;/L
9.5
1. 9
3.6
1. 9
8.5
UG/L
540
42
2. 6
2.)
2.6
250
60
22
48
UG/L
UG/1.
UG/L
2 4J
FS-li03
SOUTH
OF SITE
06/04/91
1410
r-<;/L
12
0.20
6.0
1.9
6.3
UG/L
190
36
3.8
12
53
6.5
4. 2
5.0
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
1.)J
FS-t.04
SOUTH
OF SITE
06/04/91
1300
r-<;/L ,,
0.36
3.2
4 . 4
5.2
UG/L
320
31
29
200
9. I.
4.2
2.6
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
0.61J
-
FS-405
SOUTH
BGROUND
06/0li/91
0840
r-<;/L
5. l
3.0
2. 4
2.2
2.9
UG/L
2li00
36
3. 7
140
34
92
7. B
4. 9
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
l.4J
-
FS-406
SOUTH
OF SITE
06/04/91
0940
r-<;/L
5. 1
2.9
2.4
2. l
2. 9
UG/L
2200
34 3.9
140
34
80
7. 4
4 . 4
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
-
FS-lil0 DUPL.OF
FS-406
06/04/91
1010
5. 4
3 0
2.5
2. 1
3.0
UG/L
2500
36
3.8
2. 6
140
36
91
7. 4
4.5
UG/L
UG/L
UG/L
FS-020
HEAD OF
S TRIB
09/11/91
1030
r-<;/L
10
0. 74
4. l
6.0
5.2
UG/L
540
65
3. 1
54
20
54
19
160
UG/L
0 014J
0.036
0.012J
0 0090JN
UG/L
UG/L
O.SJJ
NA -NOT ANALYlED, J -ESTIMATED VALUE, N -PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL, ---MATERIAL WAS ANALYlED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED
4-102
---
-- -
0 125 -~ ~~-
Sca:a, feet
--- - -
* Sediment sample only at these locations
KEY:
J -Estimated Concentration
N -Presumptive Evidence
Figure 4-27
-
Pesticide Compounds in Surface Water
FCX-Statesville Remedial Investigation
Statesville, North Carolina
- -------
I
I 4.4.4 Purgeable Organic Compounds
I Purgeable organic compounds were detected in seven (7) of
the eight (8) surface water stations sampled. Figure 4-28 shows I the locations and concentrations of compounds detected in these
samples. Only one of these stations, FS-408, contained sig-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
nificant concentrations of any of the compounds detected.
Tetrachoroethene, trichloroethene, and cis-1,2-dichloroethene
were detected in this sample at concentrations of 98 ug/1, 63
ug/1 and 45 ug/1, respectively. Trans-1,2-dichloroethene and
1,2-dichloropropane were also detected in this sample but were
present at less than 5 ug/1 concentration.
Tetrachloroethylene was also detected in samples from two
additional stations, FS-409 and FS-020, where concentrations were
estimated at 2.4 ug/1 and 0.53 ug/1, respectively. These
occurrences, along with the one at FS-408, are important,
considering their locations and the acknowledged presence of
tetrachloroethylene in ground water beneath the site. The fact
that the highest concentration of tetrachloroethylene detected in
the two headwater samples, collected at FS-408 and FS-020, came
from the sample collected at FS-408, may indicate that the source
is located on Burlington Industries property. This contention is
supported by the ground water data.
At the remaining stations at which purgeable organic
compounds were detected, only one compound was detected. Carbon
disulfide was detected in two samples, from FS-407 and FS-405, at
estimated concentrations of 1.3 ug/1 and 1.4 ug/1, respectively.
Benzene was detected in the sample collected at FS-403 at an
estimated concentration of 1.1 ug/1. Chloromethane was detected
at an estimated concentration of 0.61 ug/1 in the sample from FS-
404.
4-104
- -- --- - --
Scale, feet
* Sadiment sample only at these lccations
!
KEY:
J Estimated Concentration
N Presumptive Evidence
Figure 4-28
Purgeable Organic Compounds in Surface Water
FCX-Statesville Remedial Investigation
Statesville, North Carolina
• N
- --- --- --
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
REFERENCES
1. Region IV, United States Environmental Protection Agency,
Project Operations Plan for the Remedial Investigation at
the FCX-Statesville Superfund Site, Statesville, North
Carolina, June 1991. ·
2. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Guidance on
Remedial Investigations Under CERCLA, EPA/540/G-85/002, June
1985.
3. United States Department of the Interior, Statesville
West (North Carolina), Quadrangle, 7.5 Minute Series
Topographic Map, 1969.
4. Fred C. Hart, Environmental Evaluation Report: FCX
Distribution Center, Prepared for Souther States
Cooperative, Inc., February 27, 1986.
5. North Carolina Department of Human Resources, Division
of Health Services, Site Assessment Report, FCX-
Statesville, March 1987.
6. Weston•SPER, Memorandum from Bethany Hunton, TAT Region
IV to Don Rigger, OSC, EPA Region IV, Subject: FCX-
Statesville, February 19, 1990.
7. Don Rigger, OSC, EPA Region IV, Personal Communication.
8. North Carolina Department of Human Resources, Division
of Health Services, Preliminary Assessment Report, FCX-
Statesville, March 1986.
9. Debbie von Wright, Site Assessment Section, EPA Region
IV, Personal Communication.
10. U. s. Census Bureau Population Survey, 1980.
11. OHM Analytical Data Report, FCX-Statesville, Project
Number 6803S.
12. P.E. LaMoreaux and Associates, Analytical Data Report
for FCX-Statesville, January 1990, Transmitted to Mark
Rigatti, O.H. Materials.
13. NUS, Draft Screening Site Inspection Report, Burlington
Industries, Statesville, North Carolina, in progress,
January 1991.
(Continued next page)
4-106
•
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
REFERENCES (Continued)
14. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Region
IV, Environmental Services Division, Environmental
Compliance Branch Standard Operating Procedures and
Quality Assurance Manual, February 1, 1991.
15. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Region
IV, Environmental Services Division, Analytical Support
Branch Operations and Quality Control Manual, October
1990.
16. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Survey, Iredell
County. North Carolina, June 1964.
17. U.S. Geological Survey Water Resources Investigations
Open File Report 80-44, Basic Elements of Ground Water
Geology.
18. Harry E. LeGrand, Geology and Groundwater in the
Statesville Area. NC, NC Department of Conservation and
Development, Bulletin No. 68, 1954.
19. Memorandum: From Mark Rigatti, O.H. Materials, to Don
Rigger, OSC, EPA Region IV, Subject: Deep Well
Specifications. FCX-Statesville, October 1989.