NCD079044426_20090819_General Electric Co. Shepherd Farm_FRBCERCLA RA_Proposed Performance Monitoring Modifications-OCR

RA
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Waste Management
Beverly Eaves Perdue
Governor
Dexter R. Matthews
Director
Mr. Michael Townsend
Remedial Project Manager
Superfund Remedial & Site Evaluation Branch
U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4
Sam Nunn -Atlanta Federal Center
6 I Forsyth Street, S. W.
Atlanta, GA 30303
August 19, 2009
RE: Proposed Performance Monitoring Modifications
General Electric/Shepherd Farm NPL Site
East Flat Rock, Henderson County
NCD 079 044 426
Dear Mr. Townsend:
Dee Freeman
Secretary
The North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources (NC DENR) Superfund
Section has received the Proposed Performance Moniloring Modificalions for the General
Electric/Shepherd Farm National Priority List (NPL) Site. The NC DENR Superfund Section
has reviewed this document and offers the following comments.
GENERAL ELECTRIC/SHEPHERD FARM NPL SITE
Proposed Performance Monitoring Modifications
On behalf of GE Lighting Systems (GELS), Geosyntec Consultants (Geosyntec) has prepared a
request for five modifications to the Annual Superfund Performance Monitoring Program at the
above referenced site. The proposed modifications arc as follows:
I. Reduction in the remediation target compound (RTC) list for groundwater, surface
water, sediment, and the groundwater remediation system (GRS) influent and effluent;
2. Revisions to the monitoring network;
1646 Mail Service Center. Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1646
Phone: [phone] I FAX: [phone] I Internet: www.wastenotnc.org
An Equal Opportunity\ Affirmative Action Employer
Mr. Michael Townsend
General Electric/Shepherd Farm NPL Site
Proposed Performance Monitoring Modifications
NCO 079 044 426
August 19, 2009
Page I
3. Removal of granular activated carbon (GAC) from the GRS treatment train;
4. Modification of the ecological monitoring program; and,
5. Institution of passive diffusion sampling technology.
The NC DENR Superfund Section has reviewed the Proposed Performance Monitoring
Modifications for the General Electric/Shepherd Farm NPL Site. The NC DENR
Superfund Section concurs with the aforementioned modifications to the performance
monitoring activities at the General Electric/Shepherd Farm NPL Site, subject to the
following conditions.
1. State concurrence on the Proposed Performance Monitoring Modifications for the
General Electric/Shepherd Farm NPL Site is based solely on the information
contained in the subject request. Should the State receive new or additional
information that significantly affects the conclusions contained in the Proposed
Performance Monitoring Modifications for the General Electric/Shepherd Farm
NPL Site, the State may modify or withdraw this concurrence with written notice
to the United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) Region IV.
2. State concurrence on this Proposed Performance Monitoring Modification.1· for
the General Electric/Shepherd Farm NPL Site in no way binds the State to concur
in future decisions or commits the State to participate, financially or otherwise, in
the cleanup of the Site. The State reserves the right to review, overview,
comment, and make independent assessment of all future work relating to this
Site.
3. If, after remediation is complete, the total residual risk level exceeds 10·6, the
State may require deed rccordation/rcstriction to document the presence of
residual contamination and possibly limit future use of the property as specified in
North Carolina General Statute (NCGS) I 30A-3 I 0.8.
Upon approval by the US EPA, Geosyntec may implement the aforementioned
modifications on behalf of GELS.
Mr. Michael Townsend
General Electric/Shepherd Farm NPL Site
Proposed Performance Monitoring Modifications
NCD 079 044 426
August 19, 2009
Page 2
The NC DENR Superfund Section appreciates the opportunity to comment on this
document. If you have any questions or comments, please feel free to contact me at (919)
508-8466 or at david.multison(aincdcnr.gov.
Sincerely,
David B. Mattison
Environmental Engineer
NC DENR Supcrfund Section
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
REGION 4
Todd K. Kafka
Geosyntec consultants
ATLANTA FEDERAL CENTER
61 FORSYTH STREET
ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303-8960
1255 Roberts Boulevard, Suite 200
Kennesaw, Georgia 30144
Subject: Proposed performance Monitoring Modifications
GE Lighting Systems /Shepherd Fann Superfund Site
East Flat Rock, North Carolina
Dear Mr. Kafka:
This letter is in response to the July 27 th request for modification to the Annual Superfund
Performance Monitoring Program. I have reviewed the request for modifications to the
performance monitoring program and agree with the following modifications given a few
stipulations.
I.) We are in a6'!"eement with the first modification, reduction of the RTC list;
provided that in the fifth year corresponding to the Five year review, the analyses
of the samples taken include the RTCs that are being removed per the
Remediation Goal Verification Plan (RGVP) to assure that the levels remain at
the current levels.
2.) We are also in agreement with the second modification, revision to the monitoring
network. We agree that MW-3 and MW-15 should be abandoned in accordance
with North Carolina well regulations, given their current location in the flood
plain. However, I am concern that the absence of those two wells leaves a fairly
large gap in the well network. I believe we should take some steps to close that
gap. My first recommendation is to take groundwater samples from the creek bed
using the Henry tube samplers. This should be reasonably effective given
groundwater is discharging to the creek. The sampling of the creek bed can occur
in the 5th year corresponding to the five year review as well.
3.) The third modification, removal of granular activated carbon from the GRS
treatment train. We agree with the assessment of the vapor effluent from the air
stripper and a!,'!"ee with the proposed change to take the carbon unit off line.
4.) I am unable to make a decision on modification 4, modify ecological monitoring
program, without further investigation. I will make further inquires internally,
and get back to you with regard to this modification.
Internet Address (UAL) • http://www.epa.gov
Aecycfed/JlecycJable •Prinlod wMh Vogolablo OW Based Inks on Recydod Papor {Mlnnlum J0"/4 Po~consum&r)
•
5.) We are also in agreement with modification 5, institution of passive diffusion
sampling technology. The stipulation with the approval of this modification is
similar to that of modification 1. In the fitlh year corresponding to the five year
review, samples should be taken using the methods that are currently being used.
If you arc in agreement with the stipulations associated with the proposed modification,
you can begin implementing the changes. If you need clarification on any of the
stipulation or have questions in general, or any further recommendations to add to
address the concerns that I have expressed, don't hesitate to contact me.
To a separate issue we spoke about briefly by phone. As a part of the five year review we
are required to show the plume maps superimposed on the plat maps to aid in addressing
any possible institutional control matters. The reports that I have don't include any maps
outlining the aerial extent of the plume. I am attempting to complete the five year review
next week, is it possible to provide maps of the plume from the existing data within that
time frame.
Again, ifthere are any questions or concerns don't hesitate to contact me.
Michael Townsend,
Remedial Project Manager
Cc: Mr. John Franklin, GELS
Mr. David Mattison, NCDENR
Geosyntec C>
consultants
1255 Roberts Boulevard, Suite 200
Kennesaw, Georgia 30144
I'll 673.202.9500
FAX [phone]
www .gc11syntcc.ct1m
27 July 2009
Mr. Michael Townsend
Supcrlirnd Remedial and Site Evaluation Branch
Waste Management Division
U.S. EPA Region IV
61 Forsyth Street, I I th Floor
Atlanta, GA 30303
Subject: Proposed Performance Monitoring Modifications
GE Lighting Systems/Shepherd Farm Superfund Site
East Flat Rock, North Carolina
Dear Mr. Mattison:
On behalf of GE Lighting Systems (GELS), Geosyntec Consultants (Geosyntec) has
prepared this request for five modifications to the Annual Superfund Perfonnancc
Monitoring Program at the above referenced site. The five proposed modifications were
previously presented and discussed by Geosyntec and GELS representatives during the 14
May 2009 site visit performed by you and Mr. Michael Townsend of the USEPA as part
of the five-year review process. The proposed modifications arc as follows:
I. Reduction in the remediation target compound (RTC) list for groundwater,
surface water, sediment, and the groundwater remediation system (GRS)
influent and cfiluent;
2. Revisions to the monitoring network;
3. Removal of granular activated carbon (GAC) from the GRS treatment
train;
4. Modification of the ecological monitoring program; and,
5. Institution of passive diffusion sampling technology.
A sixth modification -re-evaluation of the residential well network -was also proposed
at the site meeting. It was verbally agreed by all parties that an updated residential well
survey would be a prudent course of action. Because the survey has not been completed
GR4369/GA090J56_Pcrf. Mon Rec ivlmls_27JUUl9.doc
cngmeers scientists innovators
Mr. Michael Townsend
27 July 2009
Page 2
to date, GELS will pursue the proposed residential well network modification under
separate cover upon completion of the survey.
We believe these suggested modifications will continue to allow the GRS to be monitored
effectively. Each proposed modification is discussed separately below.
PROPOSED MODIFICATION I: REDUCTION IN THE RTC LIST
The Remedial Goal Verification Plan (RGVP) in the approved Final Design and
Remediation Action Work Plan .for Groundwater (GeoTrans, 2000) established a
procedure for moditying the performance monitoring program. Section 2.4 of the
document states that "this list [of RTCs] will remain unchanged until at least four
consecutive temporal measurements from the given monitoring points within a subsite
indicate a given RTC is consistently below its corresponding ROD remedial goal." The
following table summarizes that several RTCs meet this criterion for various impacted
media at both Subsitcs.
Table I. Summary of RTCs meeting RGVP criterion during previous four sampling events
RTC
Benzene
Chloroform
Lead
Trans-1.2-dichlorocthene
Nickel
Mamrnnese*
PCBs**
Notes:
✓
*
**
NA
GRS
Monitorine. \Veils Surface \V:tter Sediment influent/effluent
✓ ✓ ✓ ✓
✓ (GE Subsitc) ✓ ✓ Retain
✓(RWSF-1) ✓ ✓ NA
✓ ✓ ✓ ✓
✓(RWSF-1) ✓ ✓ NA
------NA
Not analyzed ✓ Retain Not analyzed
Meets RGVP criterion for removal from all locations except those noted in
parenthesis.
Remedial goal for manganese is based on secondary MCL for aesthetic quality
only; naturally occurring element with no documented health-effects.
PCBs arc only considered an RTC for sediment and surface water.
Not applicable (e.g., metals not addressed by remedy).
The supporting analytical data for these proposed revisions are provided in the Annual
Groundwater Remedial Action Performance Monitoring Reports (Annual Reports). For
GR4369/GA090356_Pcrf. Mon Rec Mo<ls_27JUL09.drn;
engineers scientists innovators
Mr. Michael Townsend
27 July 2009
Page 3
ease of reference, these data have been organized into the following attachments to this
document:
• Attachment A -Performance monitoring well time-concentration tables for both
Subsitcs
• Attachment B -Summary of GRS influent/effluent groundwater results smcc
GRS start-up (updated through I Q2009)
• Attachment C-Summary of surface water results since GRS start-up
• Attachment D -Summary of sediment results since GRS start-up
A brief summary of the RTC results for each medium is presented below.
Groundwater (Monitoring Well Results)
A matrix of remedial goal (RG) cxceedances for each RTC at each well since GRS
startup has been used in the foregoing analysis and is provided in Table 2 for reference.
• Benzene -MW-I 6A is the only well location at both Subsites that has exhibited a
benzene RG exceedancc historically. However, the most recent exceedance was
reported in December 2001 (14 sampling events ago). Therefore, benzene is
requested for removal from the RTC list for the annual groundwater sampling
program since it satisfies the removal criterion.
• Chlorofonn -Chlorofonn has not exhibited RG excecdances in the Shepherd
Fann perfonnance well network since the GRS start-up in October 2000. As a
result, chloroform is requested for removal from the RTC list at Shepherd Fann
Subsitc well locations during subsequent annual sampling events since it satisfies
the removal criterion.
• trans-1,2-Dichloroethene (tDCE) -tDCE has not been detected above its RG in
any previous samples from either Subsite since GRS start-up, and historically has
been non-detect 111 vast majority of perfonnance monitoring wells.
Concentrations of the tDCE isomer arc typically added to those of the cis-1,2-
GR4369/GA090356_Perf. Mon Rec i\'lods_27JUL09.doc
engmeers scientists innovators
Mr. Michael Townsend
27 July 2009
Page 4
Dichloroethene (cDCE) isomer to detennine the total 1,2-DCE concentration.
However, unlike cDCE, tDCE is not produced during microbially-mcdiated
biodegradation reactions, and therefore does not provide insights on the degree of
biodegradation. As a result, tDCE is requested for removal from the RTC list at
both Subsites since it satisfies the removal criterion.
• Lead-Lead was last reported above its RG in GE Subsite wells in June 2001 (16
sampling events ago) at MW-13. Therefore, lead is requested for removal from
the RTC list at the GE Subsite during subsequent sampling events since it meets
the removal criterion. At Shepherd Fann, lead has not been found above its RG in
four or more sampling events at the three monitoring wells but was reported
above its RG at one recovery well (R WSF-1) in September 2006. Metals impacts
at R WSF-1 may be related to the steel surface casing at this recovery well and/or
its associated metallic components, as this is the only location at both sites to also
exhibit nickel exceedances as will be shown below. Because of the differences in
well construction between the monitoring wells and recovery well, we request that
lead be removed from the RTC list from the Shepherd Fam1 Subsite monitoring
wells (MW-64, -64A, and -66) for subsequent sampling events, hut be retained for
analysis from R WSF-1. Should the lead concentration in R WSF-1 continue to be
less than its RG during the next two sampling events, then GE may request the
removal of lead trom the analyses conducted at R WSF-1 at a later date.
• Manganese -Manganese is a naturally occurring element in soils and rock that
can readily dissolve in groundwater. Not surprisingly, manganese is ubiquitous in
groundwater at both Suhsites. As an example of the natural levels of manganese
in groundwater, a histogram of the historic manganese concentrations collected
from residential wells between 1997 and 2008 was created and is provided in the
chart below (78 total samples). The residential wells were used in this assessment
since they arc located in areas unaffected by contamination at GE or Shepherd
Farm Subsites. Of the 78 total samples, 44 (56%) had concentrations less than the
50 pg/L remedial goal for manganese and 34 (44%) had concentrations greater
than the RG.
GR4369/GA090356_Pcrt·. M,in Rec i\lo<ls_27JUUl9.dnc
engmeers scientists innovators
Mr. Michael Townsend
27 July 2009
Page 5
Manganese in Residential Well Samples
(1997-2008)
25 -----------------------~ <11 ~ 20 f-.,
t 15 i--:,
V ~ 10 +-
0
~
<11 .c
E :, z
Concentration in ug/L
• Of note, three of the residential wells in the current monitoring program have also
consistently revealed manganese concentrations greater than its RG -WW-5 (8 of
9 samples), WW-17 (6 of6 samples), and WW-82 (8 of8 samples). Upgradient
wells -MW-61 at the Shepherd Farm Subsite and MW-57 at the GE Subsite -
also exhibited manganese RG exceedances of 90.9 pg/L and I 02 pg/L,
respectively, in 1997 when they were sampled for metals. Manganese has no
documented health effects and has been given a secondary maximum contaminant
level (MCL) (equivalent to the state's 2L standard) based solely on aesthetic
impacts (e.g., staining, taste). Furthennore, manganese would not be anticipated
to be associated with the historic releases of chlorinated solvents and PCBs at
either Subsite. For these reasons, manganese is recommended for removal from
the RTC list for subsequent groundwater sampling events at both Subsites.
• Nickel -Nickel detections have been extremely rare in groundwater from both
Subsites. At the GE Subsite, there have been no nickel RG exccedances
historically. At Shepherd Fann, nickel has not exceeded its RG at the three
monitoring wells since GRS start-up; however, as with lead, the single exception
is an exceedance two years ago at the RWSF-1 recovery well. Like lead, the
nickel detection may be related to metal components at this recovery well. We
recommend that nickel be removed from the RTC list from subsequent
GR43691GA090356_perf. Mon Rec Mmls_27JUL09.doc
engineers scientists innovators
Mr. Michael Townsend
27 July 2009
Page 6
groundwater sampling events at the GE Subsite and from the three monitoring
wells at Shepherd Farm, but retained for R WSF-1. Should the nickel
concentration in R WSF-1 continue to be less than its RG during the next two
sampling events, then GE may request its removal from the analyses conducted at
RWSF-1 at a later date
GRS Influent/Effluent
• Benzene -Benzene has only been detected in seven of 32 influent samples and
never in the 32 effluent samples. Of the seven detections, only three have
exceeded its I ug/L RG with the most recent being March 2008 (2 ,1g/L), five
sampling events ago. Prior to that, benzene had not been detected since
September 2001 (22 sampling events). These historic results correspond closely
with the low levels of benzene reported at the individual monitoring we11s at both
Subsites as discussed above. Therefore, benzene is requested for removal from
the RTC list for the subsequent quarterly ORS influent/effluent sampling events
since it meets the removal criterion.
• tDCE -As discussed previously, tDCE has not been present in GE or Shepherd
Fann Subsite groundwater samples above its 70 ,1g/L RG during performance
monitoring sampling since 2000. Not surprisingly, ORS influent samples have
rarely had detectable amounts of tDCE, and when detected, the concentrations
have been less than 2.5 pg/L. Therefore, tDCE is requested for removal from the
RTC list for subsequent quarterly ORS influent/effluent sampling events since it
meets the removal criterion.
• Lead, manganese, and nickel -The ORS remedy (e.g., air stripper) is not designed
to treat metals, and therefore, metals analyses of the influent and effluent samples
do not provide meaningful insights into the effectiveness of the remedy. When
the ORS initia11y started, GELS used metals data from the ORS effluent to assess
pre-treatment procedures since the effluent was used for other site processes. The
use of the effluent ceased in approximately 2004, and therefore, the metals
concentrations are no longer required by GELS. The ORS discharge is mixed
with plant effluent and discharged to the Hendersonvi11e Water and Sewer
Department (HWSD). The combined discharge is monitored by GELS per its
GR4369/GA090356_Pcrf. l\fon RL-c ivlmls_27JUL09.doc
engmeers scientisls innovators
Mr. Michael Townsend
27 July 2009
Page 7
industrial wastewater discharge pennit issued by the City of Hendersonville. As a
result, we recommend that the total metals analyses for lead, manganese, and
nickel be removed from subsequent quarterly influent/effluent sampling events.
Surface Water
• Benzene -Benzene has not been detected in any of the six surface water sampling
locations during the annual sampling program (nine events). We request that
benzene be removed from the RTC list for subsequent surface water sampling
events since it meets the removal criterion.
• Chlorofonn -Chloroform has not been detected in any of the six surface water
sampling locations during the annual sampling program (nine events). We request
that chloroform be removal from the RTC list for subsequent surface water
sampling events since it meets the removal criterion.
• Lead, manganese, and nickel -Lead and nickel have never been reported above
their state surface water standards (regulated under I SA NCAC 28) in the three
surface water sampling locations analyzed for metals since GRS startup. There is
no 28 standard for manganese. We request that lead, manganese, and nickel be
removed from the RTC list for subsequent surface water sampling events since
they each meet the removal criterion.
• PCBs -PCBs have been detected in only 2 of 26 surface water samples. The
most recent detection occurred in September 2005 at SW-2. The overall lack of
PCBs in surface water reflects the very low solubility of these compounds and is
not unexpected. There is no state standard for PCBs in surface water, preventing
any meaningful comparisons for these data. For these reasons, we request that
PCBs be removed from the RTC list for subsequent surface water sampling
events.
Sediment
• There are no state sediment standards for any of the RTCs, thus preventing a valid
comparison between metals and VOC results against applicable regulatory
thresholds. PCE is the only VOC that has been historically detected in any of the
GR4369/GA090356_Pcrf. Mon Rec Mmls_27JUUl9.doc
engmeers scientists innovators
Mr. Michael Townsend
27 July 2009
Page 8
sediment samples. Due to the absence of state sediment standards, benzene,
chloroform, lead, nickel and manganese are requested for removal from the
subsequent sediment sampling events since they each meet the removal criterion.
PROPOSED MODIFICATION 2: REVISIONS TO THE MONITORING
NET\VORK
An established procedure for removing monitoring wells from the performance
monitoring network was not established in the RGVP. However, common procedures for
assessing the adequacy of performance monitoring wells in other regulatory programs
such as RCRA Corrective Action include an assessment of historic regulatory
exceedances and overall representativeness of the monitoring location for meeting
remedial objectives.
As was observed during the 14 May 2009 five-year review site visit, MW-15 and MW-3
at the GE Subsite are no longer considered adequate monitoring locations for the
performance monitoring program for the following reasons:
• As shown in Table 2, neither well has exhibited a RG cxccedance in the last I 0
sampling events with the exception of manganese. As discussed in Proposed
Modification I, we believe manganese levels in groundwater are naturally
elevated and not representative of groundwater impacts at GELS.
• MW-3 and MW-15 are cross-gradient to the former source area (drain line) and
arc not positioned to provide meaningful insights on plume geometry or stability
(Attachment E).
• Both wells arc located in the floodplain of Bat Fork Creek and are prone to partial
submergence as a result of beaver dams on the creek. As you recall, this was the
case during the 14 May 2009 site visit. GELS has made numerous efforts in the
past year to trap and remove many beavers, but cannot sustain such efforts
realistically due to the size and persistence of the beaver population. The effect of
damming the creek means that groundwater levels and surface water levels will be
coincident upon equilibration. We anticipate that two beneficial outcomes from
damming will occur: (I) wetland-type conditions will develop and expand along
the creek floodplain which will foster the reducing conditions that enhance natural
CiR4369/GA090356_PcrC Mon Rec i\1ods_27JUL09.doc
cngmccrs scientists innovators
Mr. Michael Townsend
27 July 2009
Page 9
biodegradation of chlorinated VOCs, and (2) the hydraulic gradient will flatten in
this area of the site, thereby slowing groundwater flow velocities and associated
dissolved phase transport.
Recommendation: We recommend that MW-3 and MW-15 be abandoned in accordance
with North Carolina well regulations, and we propose to install a staff gauge in the area to
augment the groundwater elevation data. The staff gauge will be surveyed by a registered
land surveyor and included as a measurement point in subsequent water level
measurement events.
PROPOSED MODIFICATION 3: REMOVAL OF GRANULAR ACTIVATED
CARBON FROM GRS TREATMENT TRAIN
Vapor ct1luent from the air stripper is blown through a granular activated carbon (GAC)
treatment tank as a final polishing phase of the remedy. VOCs in the airstream partition
to the GAC during the process, allowing "treated" air to be discharged to the atmosphere.
Attachment F contains a summary table of the influent and effluent vapor sampling
results (with respect to the GAC) from the first and third quarters since GRS start-up in
October 2000 (same as Table 5-8 from the 2008 Annual Sampling Report) and provides a
comparison to the North Carolina Air Standards per 15A NCAQC 2Q.07 I I. The influent
and etrluent vapor concentrations arc converted to a mass discharge using the assumption
that air flow through the GAC is maintained at the design rate of 850 cubic feet per
minute (CFM) to provide equivalent units of pounds per year (lb/year) as the air
standards.
The summary table in Attachment F clearly indicates the VOCs in the influent samples
(e.g., prior to GAC treatment) are consistently at least two orders of magnitude below
their respective standards. As a result, direct discharge of the vapor effluent from the air
stripper would not pose a threat to air quality. Air discharge pennitting and oft~gas
treatment is not required in North Carolina if the mass of extracted VOCs is less than live
tons (e.g., 10,000 pounds) per year as stipulated in 15A NCAC 2Q.0102 (c) 2 E (i). As
documented in the 2008 Annual Report, the cumulative mass VOC mass extracted since
GRS startup in 2000 was 226 pounds as of Septemher 2008, far short of the oft~gas
treatment requirement threshold.
GR4369/GA090356_Pi.:rf. ~-Ion Ike Mods_27JUL09.doc
engineers scientists innovators
Mr. Michael Townsend
27 July 2009
Page 10
Recommendation: Based on the above analysis, we recommend that the treatment train
be modified to eliminate the GAC vapor treatment tank and allow for direct discharge of
the air stripper effluent to the atmosphere.
PROPOSED MODIFICATION 4: MODIFY ECOLOGICAL MONITORING
PROGRAM
Geosyntec is proposing modifications to the existing ecological monitoring methods that
are required in association with the Remedial Action (RA). Currently, ecological
monitoring occurs on two separate wetland systems: the Bunched Arrowhead (BA)
Wetland west of Spartanburg Highway (Highway 176) and the Large GE Wetland along
the eastern perimeter of the GE Subsite. These wetlands currently undergo annual
ecological monitoring in accordance with the RGVP. The objectives of the monitoring
were primarily developed to assess the impacts, if any, of groundwater extraction on the
wetland ecology. At the BA Wetland, however, the monitoring program was designed to
focus on potential impacts to a population of federally and state protected (endangered)
bunched arrowhead (Sagillaria .fc1sciculata), in addition to evaluating general wetland
conditions. In 2003, populations of bunched arrowhead were also discovered in the Large
GE Wetland. Since the monitoring methodology for the Large GE Wetland had
originally been designed without consideration of the bunched arrowhead, two different
characterization methods have been utilized since approximately 2003.
Since 2003, the ecological monitoring events indicate that bunched arrowhead
populations within the Large GE Wetland are similar (in tenns of density, vigor, and
fecundity) to the population within the BA Wetland; in fact, populations arc stable and
apparently thriving in certain seeps within the Large GE Wetland. Conversely, the BA
Wetland appears to be more sensitive to localized physical conditions (e.g., ponding due
to tree falls, etc.) and competition from other species. Importantly, the BA Wetland lies
on uncc)ntrolled property; in 2008, Geosyntec discovered that at least two wetland
piezometers had been destroyed and a third could not be located. Potential disturbances
from trespassers are much more likely to occur to the BA Wetland than within the Large
GE Wetland, which has restricted access. These potential disturbances could adversely
impact the bunched arrowhead population and negatively bias the monitoring results.
GR4369/GA.090356_Perf. Mon Rec Mmls_27JUL09.doc
engineers scientists innovators
Mr. Michael Townsend
27 July 2009
Page 11
Since the initiation of the ecological monitoring program, the GRS has had no discernible
impact on the ecological conditions at the BA Wetland or the Large GE Wetland. The
overall vegetative composition in these systems has remained fairly stable through the
eight-year monitoring period that has included high rainfall periods and severe droughts.
Recommendation: Based on the discussion above, we recommend that the following
changes be made the annual ecological monitoring program:
• The monitoring methodology used at the BA Wetland should be modified and
employed at the Large GE Wetland to document the status of the bunched
arrowhead population that has developed. Because of the endangered status of
this species, the current populations should be monitored for lateral/spatial
distribution, vigor/health, and fecundity (ability to successfully reproduce).
Because of the bunched arrowhead's specific habitat requirements, which arc
closely tied to hydrology, this species serves as a good indicator as to whether
changes in hydrology are occurring as a result of the RA.
• The ecological monitoring should be terminated at the BA Wetland and focus
instead on exclusively on the Large GE Wetland for three important reasons:
I. The Large GE Wetland is on GE property and access can be controlled
compared to the BA Wetland. Conversely, the BA Wetland is not owned
by GE, is easily accessible, and at greater risk of disturbance from
unrelated activities;
2. The Large GE Wetland is immediately downgradient of the capture zone
at the GE Subsite and therefore provides a more realistic assessment of the
effects of groundwater extraction on local conditions; and
3. The bunched arrowhead population appears to be stable within the Large
GE Wetland and is potentially expanding, and therefore, has greater
importance regarding the species' survivability.
• We recommend that the remaining wetland piezometcrs at the BA Wetland be
abandoned in accordance with North Carolina well abandonment regulations.
GR4369/GA090356_1'crf. Mon Rec Mods_27JUUl9.d(l(;
engmeers scientists innovators
Mr. Michael Townsend
27 July 2009
Page 12
If approved, these changes would be made during the September 2009 annual sampling
event.
PROPOSED MODIFICATION 5: INSTITUTION OF PASSIVE DIFFUSION
SAMPLING TECHNOLOGY
In concert with the recommended removal of metals from the groundwater monitoring
RTC list discussed in Proposed Modification I (except for RWSF-1), the resulting
groundwater monitoring program would consist solely of analyzing VOCs in groundwater
samplers. Passive diffusion sampling techniques, such as passive diffusion bags (PDBs),
have become widely accepted sampling methods for long-term monitoring programs at
sites with VOCs. Passive diffusion sampling is based on the principle ofVOC molecules
diffusing over time across a scmi-penncable membrane, such as low-density polyethylene
(LDPE) in the case of PDBs. The samplers arc filled with de-ionized water so that when
deployed inside a monitoring well, a concentration gradient is present between the
groundwater and the de-ionized water, facilitating the diffusion of VOCs across the
LOPE membrane and into the de-ionized water. This results in collecting a groundwater
sample that is more representative of the area adjacent to the well screen than those taken
by more conventional methods, such as low-flow purging. In general practice, the
samplers are allowed to equilibrate for a minimum of two weeks, although studies have
shown that samplers can be deployed for as long as a year; however, bio-fouling may
reduce the long-tenn effectiveness of lengthy deployments (http://www.clu-
in.org/char/technologies/ passdi ff.cfm ).
Recommendation: We propose to initiate the use of PDBs for annual groundwater
sampling events at both Subsites with the exception of RWSF-1, in which low-flow
sampling techniques would continue to be employed to enable collection of metals
samples. The PDBs will be filled with deionized water and set at the midpoint of the
screen in each monitoring well. In cases where the well screen is partially saturated, the
PDB will be deployed approximately halfway between the water level and the bottom of
the well. Care will be taken to ensure that the PDBs are not deployed into sediment,
which would restrict diffusion. Because well purging will not be conducted, groundwater
quality parameters (pH, specific conductivity, temperature, redox, etc.) will be collected
using a down-well probe prior to the removal of the PDB to eliminate agitating the water
column. The PDBs will be deployed at least two weeks in advance of the September
GR4369/GA090356_Pcrf. Mon Rec Mmls_27JUL09.doc
engmeers scientists innovators
Mr. Michael Townsend
27 July 2009
Page 13
2009 sampling event. During subsequent annual sampling events, the PDBs will be
deployed during the June quarterly GRS sampling event to reduce concerns of bin-fouling
for longer deployments (e.g., such as deploying for a year after each sampling event).
CLOSURE
We look forward to your review of these proposed modifications so that they may be
incorporated into the September 2009 annual perfonnance monitoring sampling event
that is tentatively slated for mid-September. Should you have any questions or require
additional clarification, please contact the undersigned at 678.202.9500.
Sincerely, -· .// -7;,,,J' / f?
Todd K. Kafka
Project Manager
(t rce.d fln0--
R. Todd Hagemeyer, PG
Associate
Attachments Table 2
Copies to:
A Performance Monitoring Well Time-Concentration Tables
B Summary of GRS Influent/Effluent Groundwater Results
Since GRS Start-Up
C Summary of Surface Water Results Since GRS Start-Up
D Summary of Sediment Results Since GRS Start-Up
E September 2008 Potentiometric Surface Map
F Summary of Influent And Effluent Air Results Since GRS
Start-Up
Mr. David Mattison, NCDENR
Mr. John Franklin, GELS
Mr. Barry Hallock, GE C&l
GR4369/GA090356_Pcrf. Mon Rec Motls_27JUUl9.drn.:
engineers scientists innovators
TABLE2
GA090356/tbl 2 RG cxccedancc sununary.xlsx
Table 2
Remedial Target Compound Excccdanccs of Remediation Goals Since GRS Start-up (2000)
GE Lighting Systems Annual Performance 1\.1onitoring
East Flat Rock, North Carolina
Well REMEDIATION TARGET COMPOUNDS
1,2-DCA Benzene Chloroform· cDCE PCE '::i[[CE;" TCE VC ' bead Mn;·
GE SUBSITE
M\V-12 4 (3/05) ... ◊ ... 1/ ... ◊ ... ... 10 (12/02)
M\V-12A 5 (9/04) ... ¢ ... ¢ ... a 3 (9/05) ... ...
MW-128 10(12/02) ... 7 (9/03) ... ◊ ... ◊ ... ... ...
MW-13 ... ... ... ... ¢ ... 17(3/01) ... 16 (6/0 I) 2 (9/06)
MW-13A ... ... ... ... ◊ ... ◊ ... ... ...
MW-14 ... ... ... 18(12/00) ... ... ... 2 (9/06) ... ¢
MW-14A 10 (12/02) ... ... ... ◊ ... ◊ ... ... I (9/07)
MW?! 5 ~ ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ¢
MW-16 ... ... ... ... 2 (9/06) ... ... ... ... ◊
MW-16A 5 ( 12/04) 14 (12/01) ... 13(3/02) --... ◊ ... ... ¢
MW-22A ... ... ... ... ◊ ... ... ... ... ...
M\V-27 ... ... ... ... --... ◊ 2 (9/06) ... ◊
MW-27A ◊ ... ... ... --... ◊ ... ... ◊
MW-29 ... ... ... ... --... ... ... ... ...
,'MWE3;, ... ... ... ... 10 (12/02) ... 11 (9/02) ... ... ◊
MW-8 5 (9/04) ... ... ... --... 3 (2/05) ... ... ...
SHEPHERD FARM
MW-64 ... ... ... ... ¢ ... ... ... 7 (9/03) ...
MW-64A ... ... ... ... ◊ ... ... ... ... 2 (9/06)
MW-66 ... ... ... ... Q ... ... ... ... 14
RWSF-1 ... ... ... ... ◊ ... ... ... 2 (9/06) 3 (9/05)
!RESIDENTIAL WELLS
\V\V-5 ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... a
\VW-17 ... ... ... ... --... ... ... ... ◊
W\V-28 . ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... 6(9/03).
\V\V-33 ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ...
\V\V-34 ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ...
WW-73 ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ...
\V\V-82 ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ¢ ◊
WW-828 ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ·;'.:/ ...
Noh's:
Populat.:d cdls indicatc thc nutnbcr or sampling c\'Cllts sinct· thc la:.t RG c.,cccdancc and ils com:sponding sampling ,fatc in parcnthcsis .
.I.. No remedial goal cxc..::cdanc..:s since CiRS startup (Scpt1:mbcr/Oc1oh..:r 2000).
¢ Pararn-:tcr cxccci.kd ib RG in thc most rcc..:111 sampling r:wm (Scptcmticr 2008). ,~ .. -':~~\~.:· ---~ill Shading rcprl.'.SL'llb par:unch:r or \\·di proposL·d for diminution from future pcrli:mnanc.: monitoring C\·cnts
'Ni,·
...
...
...
...
...
... ... ... ...
... ...
...
...
... ...
...
...
...
...
2 (9/06)
I ...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
ATTACHMENT A
Performance Monitoring Well Time-
Concentration Tables
Table E-1. GE Subsite -Performance Well Analytical Results.
MW-12
Remediation
Paraml'ter Goal Sep-00 Dec-Oil Mar-01 .Jun-01 Scp-0 I Dcc-0 I i\.-Jar-02 .Jun-02 Scp-02 Dec-02
voes (µg/L)
1.2-Dii.:hlorncthanc ND (2.0) ;,-.JI) (10.0) ND (2.0) ND(]O.O) i\'[) ( 10,0) 0,'!) (4 OJ 0.')4 J Nil (4 OJ Nll(lO.O) ND(IO.O)
lk11zc11c ND(l,Oj ND (:i.O) ND (l.O) ND (.'i.O) ND(5.0) ND (2.0) ND (l.OJ ND (2.0) ND (5.0) ND (5.0l
Cl1lnn1tl1rn1 7.3 7.9 .I :-.o 7.6 .I i.6 ,J 3.S 3.1 fd1 i,6 .J :iA.I
cis-1.2-Dicblornc\ht·nc 70 16.::'-12. i 8.1 12 6 ! 2.3 ! 2.3 16.0 !4.8 ].l.(, I S.i
Tl'lrachlorm·tht·nc 313 JOO ISO 21') 2-~3 I Sf, 14" 223 270 2~7
trn11~-1.2-I Jichl\1n1c1hc1ic 711 ND (2.0) ND(IO.O) NI) (2.()) ND (10.0) ND/\0.0J 0,'[) (4.0) ND (2.0J NIJ f---l.O) 0,'[) (10.0) ND(lO.O)
Trichl(lrrn:t hcnt' 2.8 9.i S,9 .I 3.2 7.0 .I S.2 .I 6.S 6.1 S.9 12.1 9,7 .I
Vinyl chlPridc ;-,.,•[) ( I .0) ND(5.0) 0,'I) ( I .0) ND (5.0) ND (S.Ol ;-,m(:Ul) ND(l.0) ;,...•[) ( 2.0) ND(S.0} ND (5.0}
SVOCs (µg/L)
;,...•i1rohcnzc11c 111 J\'D (:Ul) ND (5.0) ND (5.0) ND (S.0) ND(S.0J ND (5.0) NA NA ND (5.0) ;,...'A
METALS TOTAL (ftg/L)
Barium 2000 55.3 .l 51.0 .! 56.0 J 5.\.9 .1 )6.6 .l 57.0 .l (, 1 .3 .I 53.4 .1 59. 7 .I 1 25 .l
Beryllium 4 0.22ND 0.28 ND 0.8 ND 0/14 ND 0.76 ND 0.2(1 .l 0.22 ;,...•]) 0.26 ND 0.2<1 ND 0.26 ND
Lead 1 S 1.2 ND 1.5 ND 1.2 ND 1.2 ND 1.2 ;,...'[) 3.2 ND 2.0 J 1.2 j\;I) 3.2 ND 10.S
ivlangancsc so 0.91 .l 0. 74 IJJ 1.3 J 0.32 ;,...'I) 0.44 11.1 0.41 .l 3.4 .I 0 16 ND 0.!6 ND 10')
Nickel 100 2.4 .I 0.8 ND 1.8 )\'[) 0.8 ND 0.8 i\'[) 0.8 l\'D 1.3 .l 1 I ND 1 1 ND I.IND
Notes: Bnldcd values indicate (ktecti:d conccnlrntinns greater than remediation goab.
U,ND • not detected
J • detected, estimated result
UJ • not detected, estimated result
D • dilution sample
E • exceed calibration limit
B • found in blank
NA• not analyzed
Table E-1. GE Subsite -Performance Well Analytical Results. (continued)
Remediation
Parameter Goal
voes (µg/LJ
l .2•Dichlor()(:\hanc
Benzene
Chloroform
i:is-1.2-Didilomclhem:
Tc!rachlorntthcne
lrnns-1 .2-1 )ich lorocthcnc
·rrichloroethem·
Vinyl chloride
SVOCs (f1g/L)
Nitnlhcnzcnc
METALS TOTAL (ftg/L)
Barium
Beryllium
Lead
M,i11ga11ese
Nickel
Notes:
U,ND • not detected
J • detected, estimated result
UJ • not detected, estimated result
D • dilution sample
E • exceed calibration limit
B • found in blank
NA • not analyzed
JO
70
2.8
10
2000
4
15
50
100
MW-12
Mar-03 Jun-03 Scp-03 Mar-04 Sep-04 Mar-05
ND ( 10.0J 9.3 .J 9.8 J 18.5 .I 3.0 25.4
ND (5.0) ND (5.0J ND (5.0) ND (JU.OJ NIJ ( I.OJ ND(IOOJ
ND (10.0) J.9 ., 5.0 .I ND {20.0) 4.0 NIJ (10.0)
( 17 43.7 64.0 57.2 40.0 56.0
173 Jii 216 332 336 270
ND ((/JOJ ND(I0.0) ]\'[) (10.0) NIJ (20 0) !. I J NIJ(IOOJ
12.5 43.1 46.6 6().() 28.0 5-U
ND(5.0) ND (5.0) ND(5.0J ND(IU.0) ND(I.OJ ND (JO.OJ
NA ND (5.0) ND (5.0)
68.7 J 97.5 J 113 J 132 J 103 B
0.26 ND 0.26 0,'D 0.26 ND OJ ND 0.3 ND
2.3 ND 1.2 ND 1.2 ND l.3 J 1.2 ND 1.2 ND
O.l()ND X.4 J 3.9 .I I I.I J 7.6 B 25.4
JI ND I. I ND l. I ND I.I ND I 1 ND 2.0 B
Bolded values indic:ite ddt·i.:ted i.:om:rntrntions gri:a1er than remi.:dimiun goals.
Sep-05 Sep-06 Sep-07 Sep-08
0.94 J ND (0.5) NIJ ( I.OJ 1.0 ND
ND ( I.OJ ND ((JSJ Nll (I.OJ LO ND
J.6 H.8 5.0 I 1.0
20.8 13.9 15.0 9.0
129 )(16 1011.0 73.0
ND ( 1.0} ND (0.5J ND(l.0) l.OND
10.3 6.0 5.0 4.0
ND(l.0) ND (0.5} ND I I.OJ l.0 ND
2.4 B 3.6 13 Nll ( 15.0J 15.0 ND
2.5 B 1.5 ND ND (50.0) 50.0 ND
l.2 B 0.8 ND ND (100.0) 100.0 ND
Table E-1. GE Subsite -Performance Well Analytical Results. (continued)
Remediation MW-12A
Parameter Goal Scp-00 Dcc-00 Mar-01 .Jun-01 Scp-01 Dcc-01 Mar-02 .Jun-02 Scp-02 Dcc-02
voe, r1,glL)
1.2-Dichlnroc1h,111c 2.0 ND (20.0) N[)(lOO) ND (10.0) ND ( 10.0) ND(\0.0) 3.') ND (2.0) 1.9 .I i'\'D {l0.0)
Bcnzrnc o!!l (10) ;\1D ( I 0.o) 0,'I) (:i.0) ;,...'!) (5.0) ND (:i.0) ND (:'i.0) 0.:0 (I.OJ NIJ(l.O) '.\'!) {2.0i l\.'D (S.O)
Chloniform 6.3 ND (20.0J 6.2 .J 4.S .I i.4.J -Ui.J ND (2.0) -Ul 6.i 4.9 .J
ci~-l .2-Dichlorocthtm· 70 21. 7 15.2 .I 20.1 I -,_,; 1.1.0 I 1. 7 3.7 12.3 ]4_(} I S.:i
Tc!rnch lortll'thcnc 390 300 383 212 299 203 S.6 1-li 2:=ii 283
!ran,-I .2-l )ichloroclhcrw 70 ND (2.0) ND/20.0) :,-.:[)([{)_()) ND(!O_O) ;-..•[) ( I 0.0) 0-'[) ( I 0_0) ;-..:!) (2.0) ND 12.0l ;\'J> (,Ul) )'\'[) ( 10.0)
Trichlnrot·thc1K 2.R 10.i t','[) (20.0) l}.S .J (1.1 .I S.i .J 3.CJ .J ND (2.0) 4,9 9,1 S.I .I
Vinyl chloride ND (l.Ol ND /10.0) ND IS.fl) ND /.'i.fl) ND/5.o) ND (S.0) 2.3 ND ( 1.0) NI) (2.0) 7''[) (:'i.())
SVOCs (fig/L)
Ni1rnhcnzc11c 10 7-!D ( .'i.0) ND(S.0) 7''[) ().0) ND (5.0) ND (.'i.0) NI> (S.0) 7''t\ NA ND (.'i.0} NA
METALS TOTAL (,ug/L)
Barium 2000 71.6 .l 61.2 .I 77.2 J 61.6 .! S 1.6 .I .'i.'i . .'i .l ()_9 .I S/i.0 .1 -11.6 .l 12 . .'i .I
Beryllium ~ 0.22 ND 0.23 ND 0.75 ND n.6S ND 0.65 i\'D 0.28 J 0.29 .I 0.26 ND 0 26 ND 0.26 7''[)
I ,cad 1 S 1.2 ND 1.2 ND I:; ND 1.2 ND 1.2 7'1[) 2.-.l i\'I) !.2 ND 1.2 ND 2.-1 ND 1.2 i"JD
rv1angancsc )() I .-1 J 3.5 IJ.I 2. ! .I 0.6.3 ND 0.58 UJ I I J 1.1 .l 0.16 ND 0.28 J 102
Nickel 100 3.0 .1 2.2 ND 2.6 ND 1.2 ND 0_()8 .1 2.4 J 1-1. I J I.I ND -.l.3 J I 1.2 .I
Notes: B\)[dcd values ind kale det~·ctcd concentrations greater than remediation goals.
U,ND -not detected
J -detected, estimated result
UJ • not detected, estimated result
D • dilution sample
E • exceed calibration limit
B • found in blank
NA • not analyzed
Table E-1. GE Subsite -Performance Well Analytical Results. (continued)
Remediation
Parameter Goal
voes (µg/L)
1,2-Dichloructhanc
Berw.:111.:
Chloroform
cis-l .2-Didiloroethene
Tetrne h lo roe t ht·nt·
trnns-l ,2-!)iehlorut·thme
·rriehll1rol.'t he11e
Vinyl chloridt·
SVOCs (µg/L)
;-..'itrohenzcne
METALS TOTAL (µg/L)
Bari urn
Ikryllium
Lcud
i\:langancsc
Nkkcl
Notes:
U,ND • not detected
J • detected, estimated result
UJ • not detected, estimated result
D • dilution sample
E • exceed calibration limit
B. found in blank
NA -not analyzed
70
70
2.X
10
:woo
4
15
50
100
MW-12A
Mar-03 .Jun-03 Sep-03 Mar-04 Sep-04 Mar-05
ND { !0,0) 1.0 J 0.97 J ND(!0.0) 2.8 ND ( 1.0)
NIJ (5.UJ ND(l.0) Nil ( 1.0) ND (50) ND(l.0) ND ( 1.0)
5.5 .J ND(2.UJ J.2 J.O J 2.9 ND(l.0)
2U 6.8 JI. I 28.6 35. 7 0.85 J
26-1 20.3 239 217 23. 10.l
ND(I0.0) ND (2.0) 0.58 J ND(IO.O) 0 74 J ND ( I.OJ
21.0 I I .I IJ.7 17.1 20.7 0.53 J
0,'[) (5.!)) -U ND(I.UJ ND (5.(JJ ND(l.0) Nil ( 1.0)
NA ND(5.0J NlJ I 10.0)
51.0 J 8 8 J 75.3 .I 8U J 81.7 B
0 26 ND 0.26 NI> 0.26 NIJ 0.3 ND 0.3 ND
1_7 ND 1.2 ND 1.2 NIJ 1.2 ND l.2ND 1.2 ND
0.16 NIJ 0.16 ND 0.16 ND 1.2 J I 1.9 B 0.16 ND
14.1 19 3 J I IND !.5 J 3.7 B 17.6 B
Buldcd values indicate tktc..:ted ..:un..:e11tratiuns greater than fl'llH..'diaiion goals.
Sep-05 Scp-06 Scp-07 Sep-08
0.53 J ND (0.5) ND(I.0) l.OND
NIJ (I.OJ ND{0.5J ND(!.O) I.ONO
ND (1.0) 8.-1 J.0 12.11
2.5 13.1 7.0 9.0
16.N 108 71.0 75.0
ND ( I.OJ ND (0.5) NIJ(I.U) !.U ND
1.0 5.8 J.0 J.O
2A ND (0.5) Nil ( 1.0) 1.0 ND
2. I I3 2.5 B ND ( 15.0) 15.0 NIJ
0.2 ND 1.5 ND ND (50.0) 50.0 ND
23.8 B 2.8 B ND ( 100.0) 100.0 NIJ
Table E-1. GE Subsite • Performance Well Analytical Results. (continued)
Remediation MW-12B
Parameter Goal Scp-00 Dcc-00 Mar-01 Jun-01 Scp-0 I Dcc-0 I i\ la r-02 Jun-02 Scp-02 Dcc-02
voes (11g/L)
1.2-Didilomcthanc ND (2.0) ND (Ill 0) ND (2.0) ND(2.o) j\'[)(2.()) ND (4.0J ND (2.0) ND (---i.0) ND(-1.0) 1.3 .I
Benzene ND(l.0) ND(:'i.0) Nll(l.ll) ND (I.OJ Nil (I II] NDC"!.Q} NIJ (I OJ ND C.0/ ND (2.0J l\;1)(2.Q)
Chloroform ND/2.0) Nil (IIJII) 0.9 J I.J .I I.I .I Nil (4 II) 1.2 .I 1.-1.J 1.7 .I ND (4.0)
cis-1.2-1 )ich lt)n1cthc11e 711 i .8 7.0 J 7.1 8.1 6.4 5.7 5.4 5 -~ 5.0 7.1
Tctrnchloroclht·nc 188 li2 128 !OS ,J 112 119 141 119 104 192
trnns-1.2-[)ichlnrocthcnc 70 ;,,,11) (2.0) ND(l0.0) ND (2.0J ND (2.0) ND (2.0) ND (4.0l ND C.0) ND (4.0) NIJ (4.0) i'\'D (4.0)
Trid1lornc1hcnc 2.8 IIA 11.J 9.2 10.6 10.1 9.J 9.J 9.9 S.2 12.9
Vinyl chloride ND(!.0) ND (.'i.O) ND (1.0) ND (1.0) i'!D ( 1.0) ;,...•[) (2.0) Nil ( 1.01 :--.'[) (2.0) ND (2.0J ND (2.0)
SVOCs (µg/L)
Nitrohl:llZCllC Ill ND(:i.0) ND (S.0) ;-..:I) (5.0) ND(S.o) ND <5.0) ND (5.0) NA :-..'A ND (5.1) NA
META LS TOTAL (11g/L)
Bnriurn 2000 12.6 J 13. 7 J ! :i.7 .l IS.OJ 16.3 J I :i.8 .! ! 8.4 .1 16.7 J 18.4 .I 54.0 J
Beryllium 4 0.22 i'!D 0.5 ND 0.87 i'\'[) 0.22 ND 0.22 ND 0.22ND 0.39 .1 0 26 ND 0.26 ND 0.26 ND
LcaJ 15 1.2 ND 1.2 ND l.5 ND l .2 ND 1.4 ND J.1 ND 1.2 ND 1.2 ND 2.8 ND 1.2 ND
lvlangancsc 50 2.7 .I 2.2 ND 8.6 .I 6.0 J l.8 ND 0.26 ND 0.5 I J 0.16ND 0.16 ND 0.16 :--:D
Nkkcl 100 1.6 .I 0.8 ND 3.1 ND 0.8 ND 0 8 ND 0.8 ;,,..:[) 0.9~ .1 I IND 1.1 ;--.;[) 1.1 ND
Notes: Hokkd values indicate dc!cctcd cm,ccntrntions greater than rc1m:diatin11 goals.
U,ND -not detected
J • detected, estimated result
UJ • not detected, estimated result
D • dilution sample
E • exceed calibration limit
8 -found in blank
NA • not analyzed
Table E-1. GE Subsite -Performance Well Analytical Results. (continued)
Remediation
Parameter Goal
voe, (µg/L)
l .2-Dichloroelhmle
lkll/.l'llC
Chloroform
ci:--I,2-1 >ichloroethl;'nl.'
'rct rachloro~·thcnl'
trnn~-l .2-Dichloroclhrnc
Trichlor0t..'!ht·ne
Vinyl chloride
SVOCs (µg/L)
Nilniht:llZ(."!ll'
METALS TOT AL (µg/L)
Barium
Beryllium
Lead
1Yl,1nga11ese
Nickel
Notes:
U,ND -not detected
J -detected, estimated result
UJ -not detected, estimated result
D -dilution sample
E -exceed calibration limit
B -found in blank
NA -not analyzed
70
70
2.8
10
2000
➔
I 5
50
JOO
MW-12B
Mar-03 .Jun-03 Sep-03 Mar-04 Sep-04 Mar-05
ND(2.G) ND(2.Q) ND (2.0) ND (2,0) ND (2.0) ND (I.OJ
ND(l.0} ND ( 1.0) ND (l.U) NU (l.U} ND (I.OJ ND ( I.OJ
1.0 J I.I .I I. I J 1.0 J 0.81 0.6] J
2.9 · -' ' -3.8 2.7 2.4 1.6
1110.0 85.5 77.1 89.6 82.6 iJ.7
ND (2.0J ND (2.U) 0-'U 0.U} ND (2.U) ND{2 OJ ND (1.0)
6.2 5.5 6.6 (i.li 6.1 5.J
ND(!.OJ ND(l.OJ ND ( I.OJ ND (1.0) ND ( I.OJ ND (I.OJ
NA ND{5.0) ND (5.1)
18.4 .l 18.2 J 74. I J 19.5 .I 17.6 B
0.26 ND 0.26 ND 0.26 ND 0.3 ND 0.3 ND
1.2 ND l.2 ND 1.2 ND 1.2 ND l.2 ND 4.5 l3
0.19 J 0.1(, ND 0.16 ND 0.16 i\;]) 8.8 B 0.1(, ND
I.I ND 2.9 .1 I.IND !.! ND !.I ND I I ND
[folded values indieale 1.h.·tei.:11.:d i.:011i.:i.:1Hra1ion~ g.reuler than TL'lllL'dialion gnals.
Sep-05 Sep-06 Sep-07 Sep-08
ND ( 1.0) ND(0.5) ND(I.U) 1.0 0,'I)
ND(l.0) ND (0.5) ND(l.OJ I.OND
0.5 7 .I ND (0.5) ND(i.O) ! .0 ND
I. l) u 1.0 1.0
7 1.0 i2.5 48.0 4-1.0
NIJ(l.U) ND (0.5} ND (I.OJ 1.0 ND
4.7 4.6 J.O J.O
ND (I.OJ ND (U.5) ND(l.0) l.O ND
l.2 ND l.7ND ND{l5.0) 15.0 ND
0.2 ND 1.5 ND ND (50.U) 50.U ND
I l ND 0.8 ND Nil (100.0) 100.0 ND
Table E-1. GE Subsite -Performance Well Analytical Results. (continued)
Remediation MW-13
Parameter Goal Sep-00 Dec-00 Mar-01 .lun-01 Scp-0 I Dec-0 I ;\:J a r-02 .lun-02 Scp-02 Dec-02
voe, (ftg/L)
1.2-l)ichlornclhanc ND (2.0) ND (2.0) ND (2.0) ;-..,'1)(2.Q) ND (2.0) ;,,.;'[) (2.0) ;-..'[) (2 0) ND (2.0l ND (2.0) ND (2.0J
Benzene ND(I 0) ;-...'[) (1.0) ND(l.OJ ND(I_O) ND (1.0) ND(l.0) Nil (I.OJ NIJ{I.Ol ND (I.OJ ND(I.OJ
Chlorof(m11 ND (2.0) N!J (2.0) ND (2.0) NDCUl) ND G.0) ND (2.0) ND (2.0) ND (2.0) ND (2.0) ND (2.01
cis-1.2-[lichlnmc!hcnc 70 3.9 ND (2.0) ' ' .. , I 4 J ND (2.0) ND(2.0} 0.97 .I 1.:; J 2.7 0.94 J
Tctrachl(irocthcnc 64.6 39.:=-255 (dA.J 11.2 5.2 52.i 50.fl 13.1 -U,.S
Iran_,_ l .2-1)1chlorncthcnc 70 ND (2.0) NIJ {2.0) ND(2.0) ND (2.0) NDC.<l) NDC.O) :--:DC.OJ ND (2.0) ;,,,;I) (2.0) ND (2.0)
·rrichlon1cthc11c 2.8 1.4 .1 N!J {2.0) 5.3 l 1 J ND{2Jl) ND (2.0) o.n .r 1. 1 J 1.1 .J 0.79 J
Vinyl chlt1ridc ND (l.OJ ND (1.0) ND(l.0) ND (1.0) ND (l.<JJ ND(IO) ,CD I 10) ND (I.OJ Ml(l.(I) ND ( I.OJ
SVOCs (µg/L)
Nitnihen/.ene 10 ND (5.5) i'm(5.0) ND (5.5) ND{:U) ND (5.0) ND(5.o) 0,'A NA :--.!D (5.0) NA
~IETALS TOTAL (µg/L)
lfarium 2000 45.'.' J 29.4 .1 15.8 J 128 J 43.1 .l 72.4 .1 20.S J 12.5 J I 8.7 J 10.6 J
Beryllium 4 0.22 ND 0.8 ND 0.97 ND 1.3 J 0.99 ND 0.92 .1 0.-11 .I 0.26 ND 0 2(1 :--.![) 0.26 ND
Lead 15 7. 7 2.2 ND 1.4 i\'D 26.6 5.R 12.5 ND 2.3 .I 1.9 ND I. 7 ND 1.2 ND
Mnngane~e 50 61.0 26.0 11 .2 J 168 4 1.2 J so.:-.I 21.0 39.➔ 103 3 1.9
Nickel 100 14.! .I 0.8 ND 2.0 ND 7.9 .I 3.0 .I ➔.6 J 2.2 .I I.IND 1.1 ND I I ND
Notes: Bnklcd nilues indicate detected concentrntions greater than remediation goab.
U,ND • not detected
J -detected, estimated result
UJ -not detected, estimated result
D • dilution sample
E -exceed calibration limit
B -found in blank
NA -not analyzed
Table E-1. GE Subsite -Performance Well Analytical Results. (continued)
Remediation
Parameter Goal
voes (f1g/L)
1.2-Dii.:hlorrn.:lhani:
lknzene
Chloroform
cis-1 -2-Dich!orm.:thenc
·rc1rnchl(1roL'lhenL'
trnns-1.2-Dichlorneihcnl'
'J'rii.:hloruclhenc
Vinyl d1loridc
SVOCs (µg/L)
Nitrnbt.'nzcnt.'
METALS TOTAL (11g/L)
Barium
lkrylliwn
Lead
Manganc~c
Nid-:d
Notes:
U,NO • not detected
J • detected, estimated result
UJ • not detected, estimated result
D -dilution sample
E • exceed calibration limit
B -found in blank
NA -not analyzed
70
70
2.8
10
2000
4
15
50
IOU
MW-13
Mar-03 Jun-03 Sep-03 Mar-04 Sep-04 Mar-05
ND (2.0J Nil (2 OJ ND (2.0) ND (2.0) ND(2.0) ND ( I.OJ
ND(l.OJ ND (I.OJ NIJ ( I.OJ Nil I I.OJ ND (I.OJ ND (!.U)
ND(2.0J ND (2.UJ NlJ{2.0) ND(2.Cl) ND (2.0) ND(l.0)
0.71 J U. 7S J U.95 J O 88 J 5.5 I I
25.9 IS.8 1-1.7 22.2 6.S 111.6
ND(2.UJ ND (2.U) ND (:!.OJ NIJ (2.0J ND (:LU} ND {!.OJ
0.95 J 0.66 J U.58 J 0.55 J 1.5 J 1.0
Nil (I OJ ND ( I.OJ ND (1.0) ND(I.UJ ND ( 1.0) ;-,._1[) ( I.OJ
NA N!J(5.0) ND (5.0)
20.1 J l l.2 .l l 0.2 J 2 l.5 .I 20.3 B
0.26 ND 0.26 ND 0.26 ND OJ ND 0.3 ND
4.5 .I 1.2 N!J l.2 NO 2.8 ND 2.9 B 3.1 B
39.4 48.2 26.6 50.l ms 9J.4
I.IND I. I ND I. I ND I.I J 1.5 B I.IND
Bo!tkd \'alues indii.:att.' dt.'tcctcd i.:oni.::t.'lltrations grcat~·r than remediation goals.
Sep-05 Sep-06 Sep-07 Sep-08
ND(I.OJ NlJ(0.5) ND(l.UJ 1.0 ND
ND(I.0J ND (0.5) ND\ !.UJ 1.0 ND
Nil I I.OJ ND (0.5) ND{l.0) !.U ND
1.3 2.2 1.0 2.0
2J.J 19.J l(J.11 1-Ul
NIJ(I.OJ ND (0.5) Nil ( I.OJ 1.0 ND
ND { 1.0) 1.0 Nll(I.OJ 1.0
ND (I.OJ ND(0.5J N!J(l.0) I.OND
5.1 12.4 ND(15.0) 15.0 ND
84.7 89.5 ND (50.0J 50.0 ND
1.3 B 2.6 B NIJ (100.0) IOO.O ND
Table E-1. GE Subsite -Performance Well Analytical Results. (continued)
Remediation MW-13A
Parameter Goal Scp-00 Dcc-00 Mnr-OJ Jun-OJ Scp-0 J Dec-OJ Mar-02 ,Jun-02 Scp-02 Dcc-02
voes (11g/L)
l .2•Dii.:hlorocth<mc ND I 10.0J Nil ( 10.0) ND (2.0) ND ( ! 0.0) ND ( 1!Ul) ND(lfl.(l) ND I ]fl.()) ;,,.'!) ( I fl_O) ND ( 1 O_O) ND(l0.0)
!k11zc11e ND (5.0) ND (:i.OJ o/D ( I .ll) ND (.'i.0) i",'[) { :i.O) ;,..'f) (5.0) :,...•[) (:i_O) ND (:i.OJ ND (:i.O) ;-.;I) (:i ,0)
Chloroform ND (10.0) Nll(I00J ND (2.0) ND(IO 0) ND(l0.0) ND (10.0) ND ( 10.0) ND (l(l.0) ND(lO.O) NDflO.())
cis-l .2-1 )ichlorocthcnc 70 ND{lil.0) N!J (10.0) ND (2.0) 2.6 .l 3.J J ;'\;[) (10.0) :i.-' .1 • 3.-1 .l 3.i .! 3.2 .I
Tctrnch lorrn:th1.·nc 2i0 338 2.5 . .5 236 32? .J 2-16 3111 2i6 Joi 34.5
trnn,-l .2-l)ichlornc1hrnc 70 Nll/10.0) ND (10 0) ND (2.0) ND ( I 0.0) ND (10.0) ND (10.0) )\,!!)()()_()) ND (10.0) ND (10.0) ND(lO.())
Trich lnr(lctl1cnc 2.X 7.1 .I 7.6 .I NIJ C:UlJ 4.S .J 6.9 .I 3.3 .I i.J ., 6.S .I 6.9 .I 6.8 .I
Vinyl chloride ND (5.0) NIJ (5.0J ND (I.OJ ND (5.0) ND (5.0) ND (5.0) 0,'i) (5.0) ND (5.0) ND (5.0J ND(5.0l
SVOCs (µg/L)
Nitrobl'nzcnc Ill ND (5.0) ND(5.0) ND (5.5) ND (5.0) ND (5.0) 0,'[) (5.0) Nt\ NA ND (5.0) Nt\
METALS TOTAL (f1g/L)
Ranum 2000 ! 2.0 J 13.6 .l Ji .9 J l4.0 .I 13.4 .1 1-1.2 .1 1-1.0 ,1 12.-1 J 12.7 .I 10.0 .I
Beryllium ~ 1.2 .I 0.22 ND 0.6i ;\[) 0.22 ND 0.-12 ND 0.22 ND 0.26 .1 0.26 0,'[) 0 26 NI) 0.26 ND
Lead 15 I .5 J 1.5 ND 5.4 ND 1.2 ND 2.1 ND 2.3 ND 1.2 ND 1.2 ND 1.8 ND 1.2 ND
i'vla11gancsc 50 10.2 J 8.9 J 30_(, 10.9 J 11.4 J 13. i J 1 1.5 .r 9.5 J 9.3 J 7.6 .1
Nickel 100 2.3 .I 0.8 ND 2.6 ND 0.8 N! > 0.8 ND 1.2 ND 0 87 J I I ND I IM) I. 1 ND
Notes: Boldcd values indicate dctcc!cd conccntrnlions greater than rcmediminn goals
U,ND • not detected
J • detected, estimated result
UJ • not detected, estimated result
D • dilution sample
E • exceed calibration limit
B • found in blank
NA • not analyzed
Table E-1. GE Subsite -Performance Well Analytical Results. (continued)
Renu.-tliation
Parameter Goal
voes (11g/LJ
1.2-Dkhkirnclham·
l.k11ZL'!ll.:
Chloroform
..:is-1,2-Dich!oroeihem·
'f'i.:trachlornelhene
trnn~-l .2-DidllonH:t heni.:
Trii.:hloroi:tlwne
Vinyl chloride
SVOCs (µg/L)
Nitrobenzcne
METALS TOTAL (µg/L)
Barium
Beryllium
Lead
/Vlangancse
Nid;o.:I
Notes:
U,ND -not detected
J -detected, estimated result
UJ • not detected, estimated result
D • dilution sample
E • exceed calibration limit
B • found in blank
NA • not analyzed
70
70
2.S
JU
2000
4
15
50
1011
Mar-03
ND (2.0J
ND(l.0)
J\'[J (2.0)
2.5
312
Nll(2UJ
6.4
ND ( I.OJ
NA
l 3.3 .l
0.26 ND
3 .5 J
9.2 J
I .I NIJ
MW-13A
.Jun-03 Sep-03 Mar-04 Sep-04 Mar-05
ND(IO.O) 0,'!)(]00) ND (10.0) ND(2.UJ ND(5.U)
)\'l) (5.(JJ ND (5.U) ND(5.U) NI) (1.U} ND (5.0)
ND (10.UJ ND ( 10.0J ND { I U.UJ ND (2.0) ND (5.0J
2. 7 J 4.S J 3.6 J 2.7 ND (5.0J
326 22-l 220 223 175
ND(lU.OJ NIJ ( IU.O) ND (10.0) ND (2.0J ND (5.U)
6.5 .I 5.7 .I 6.0.J H 3.7 .I
ND(5.0J ND (5.0J ND (:'i.U) Nll I I.OJ ND(5.0)
ND (5.0) ND (5.0}
I !.5 J 13. I J I 3.9 J 16 6 B
0.26 ND 0.26 ND 0.3 ND 0.3 ND
l.2ND 1.2 ND 2.0 ND 1.2 NU 1.2 ND
6.9 J 8.2 J 8.6 J 18.3 8.5 B
3.5 .I !. l ND I.IND 2.1 B I l NIJ
Bo!dnl values indii.:mc lktcctt·d concentrations gre.itcr th;m remediation goals.
Sep-05 Sep-06 Sep-07 Sep-08
NIJ(I.O, ND (0.5) ND ( l .U) !.OND
ND ( I.OJ ND (0.5J ND { I.OJ I.ONO
NIJ I 10) ND (0.5) ND I I.OJ 1.0 ND
2.9 3.6 3.0 4.0
195 172 2511 130
ND (l.O) ND (0.5) 0,'D (I.OJ 1.0ND
H 5.9 6.0 -UI
ND (1.0) ND (0.5) ND ( I.OJ 1.0 ND
2. I B 1.9 B ND ( I5.UJ 15.0 NO
10.U B 8.8 B i\'i) (50.0) 50.0 ND
!.I NIJ 0.8 ND ND(IOO.OJ 100.0 ND
Table E-1. GE Subsite -Performance Well Analytical Results. (continued)
Remediation MW-14
Par:;imeter Goal Sep-00 Dec-00 Mar-OJ .Jun-01 Sep-0 I Dec-0 I Mar-02 .Jun-02 Sep-02 Dec-02
voes (11g/L)
1 . 2-l )ich l<irnclhanc ND{20.0) ND ( 10.ll) ;\.11) 120.0) ND/2.0) 0-'D ( l 0.0) :--.'D ( 1 O 0) ND(l0.0) ;-,m(IO.O) 0-'[) ( I O.o) ND (-1.0)
Bcn,.cnc ND(!0.0) Nil (5.0) ND(IO.()) ND (1.0) i\'J) (S.<l) ;,..']) (5.0) N!J (.'i.O) ND (5.0) ND (5.0J ND (2.0)
Chlnro1<inn ND(20.0) ND (l 0.0) ND (2(J.0) ND (2.0) ;,...•[) (10.0) 0,'[) (10.0) ND ( I 0.0) ND(ICUl) Nil ( I 0.0) ND(<t_O)
cis-l .2-l)ichlnrncthcm· 70 9-1.-1 S-U 51 I :-:u 27.5 23.6 -1-1.-1 _10 i :n.2 2(,, 7
·rctrnchlorocthrnc 576 .I -t9J 324 2-11 .I 2:U 227 3S2 2S3 2SS 29-1
Iran.,-I . 2-I )1ch lornct lll'llC 70 ND (20.0) ND 00.0) ND C0.0) ND/2.0) ND ( Hl.0) ND (10.0) ND(lO.()) ;,-.!!) ( ! 0.0) :--.=D(IO.()) Nil (4.0)
·rrichlnrncthcnc 2.8 2113 201 )OJ 69.2 67.i (16.i 126 93.0 'JJ.2 ss.:-
Vinyl chl(lride ND(IO.O) N!J(.'i.0) ND (l(J.0) ND (1.0) ND (S.0) ND(.'i.0) N!>(S.O) ND(.'i.0} ND (S.0) ND(2.0)
SVOCs (f1g/L)
:-,.'itn1hcn;,ene 10 ND {S.OJ ND (S.0) NI) (S./l) J\'D/S.OJ ND (S.0) ND (S OJ NA NA Nil (5 I I NA
METALS TOTAL (µg/L)
Barium 2000 33.1 .1 29.S J 25.5 .I 19.9 .1 l <:l .8 J 20.1 J 19.6 .1 17 . .'-J 18.3 .I 0.-19 ND
lkr\'lliu1n 4 o.nNo 1.0 UJ !_:; ND 0.38 ND 0.88 :-,.•[) 0.22 ;-...'[) 0_4l) _I 0.26 ;\'I) 0.26 )\.']) 0.26 ;\'[)
Lead IS 1.2 ND 1.8 UJ 2.1 NIJ 1.2 ND 9.0 3.7 ND 1.2 ND 1.2 ND 1.2 ND 1.2 :-,.'])
(vlangane~c .'iO 6S3 638 .I 5 IJ 372 356 .I 335 .J 350 290 272 3. I J
Nid;t'i 100 1.2 .1 0.8 IJ.I 0.94 ;-,...:[) l.0ND 0.8 ;\'I) 0,99 J 0.8 ND !. I ND 1.1 ND 1.1 :-,.'I)
Notes: Bnlded value, indicate detected cnnecn1ra1ions greater than r~·mcdint1nn goals
U,ND -not detected
J -detected, estimated result
UJ -not detected, estimated result
D -dilution sample
E -exceed calibration limit
B -found in blank
NA -not analyzed
Table E-1. GE Subsite -Performance Well Analytical Results. (continued)
Remediation
Parameter Goal
voes o,g/L)
1.2-Dichlornl'thani:
lknzene
Chloroform
cis-1.2-!JidilurtH.:lhc11e
'J't:trnchloroelhenc
trans-! .2-Diehloror:t henc
·rrichloroethcne
Vinyl chloride
SVOCs (µg/L)
Nitrobcnzenc
METALS TOTAL (µg/L)
Barium
Beryllium
Ll:ud
Mangunese
Nickel
Notes:
U,ND -not detected
J -detected, estimated result
UJ • not detected, estimated result
D -dilution sample
E • ex:ceed calibration limit
8 -found in blank
NA• not analyzed
70
70
2.S
10
2000
4
15
50
100
MW-14
Mar-03 Jun-03 Sep-03 Mar-04 Sep-04 Mar-05
ND ( 10.0J ND { 10.0) ND ( I 0.0) ND (:.-I.OJ ND(2.0) ND (2.U)
ND(5.0J NIJ (5.0) ND (5.0) ND (2.UJ ND ( l.UJ ND (2.0)
ND/ JU.OJ NIJ(IO.U) ND (10_0) ND (-LO) ND (2.UJ ND (1.UJ
16.2 26.2 21. 7 l 7.6 13 2 JlJ.0
222 243 168 158 126 348
ND ( JO.OJ ND(!O.U) ND (JO.OJ ND(4.UJ ND (2.U) ND (2.UJ
51.-l 79.2 53.U 38.7 31.-1 225
ND (5.0J ND (5.UJ ND (5,UJ ND (2.0J ND (l.U) ND (2.0J
NA ND (5.0) ND(5.0)
44 I J 16.6 J 17.6 J I 9.5 J 19.J B
0.26 ND 0.26 ND 0.26 ND 0 3 ND 0.3 ND
1.5 ND l.2 ND l.2 ND 2.0 ND 1.2 ND 1.2 ND
1% 206 195 liO 192 487
I.I ND I.I ND ! I ND I.I ND I.I ND 1.2 B
[folded vulues indicute detected conccntrutions greater lhan fl'tnediation goals.
Sep-05 Sep-06 Se'p-07 Sep-08
NIJ(I.0) ND (0.5} ND(l.o) I.ONO
NIJ(l.0) ND {U.5) ND(\.OJ l.0ND
NIJ(l.0) NU (0.5) NIJ I I.OJ I.0NIJ
17.8 43.3 49.0 36.0
1-10 -155 JSO 260
NIJ I LU) U.X4 J NDt!.UJ l.0 ND
Sl.-1 225 130 51.0
ND (1.0) 2.11 ND{I.0) 1.0 ND
2.0 ll 1.7 Nil N!J (15.0) 15.0 ND
601) 6i5 -HO JOO
I.I ND 0.8 ND ND(I00.0) 100.0 ND
Table E-1. GE Subsite -Performance Well Analytical Results. (continued)
Remediation MW-14A
Parameter Goal Sep-00 Dec-00 Mar-01 .lun-01 Scp-0 I Dcc-0 I Mar-02 .I u n-02 Sep-02 Dcc-02
voes (11g/L)
l .2-Dichlnrocthanc ND I 10.0) ND ( 10.0) ND/10_0) I.I .J ND ( I 0.0) ND (4.0) 1.3 .I ND (·LO) IA.I 1.2 .J
Bt:nl.Cllt' ND (S.0) ND (S.OJ ;,...•[) (S.O) Nil (l.0l ND (S.0) :--.'D (2.0) NDC.()) i",'[) ( 2.0) ;'\'[) (2 0) ;\'[)(2.0)
Chl(1rn1imn ND (10.0) ND (10.0) ND (10.0J j\.'!)(2.0) ND (JO 0) ND(4.0) ND (4.fll N[)(JJ)} ND (4 OJ ND {•-1.0)
.:is-1.2-1 )ichltirrn:11lcnc 71) J] _() 32.1 3.~.6 3:i.4 28.-+ .~ l .O 2(, S 2().8 3:i (, 23.2
TL'lf.lC hlorrn.:tlK'lll' 134 ., 212 203 177 .J Ii:! 166 !SJ 200 232 173
Iran~-I .2-1 )i ch loroc1hcm· iO ;,..,•I) ( I 0.0) ND(IO.O) ND(I0.0) Nil (2.0) 0,1[) (10.0) :SIJ (4.0) 0,'J) (,t.0) ND(-UlJ 7<D (4 0) :-CD (4 OJ
Trich!owcthcm: 2.S 36 . .5 46.3 -12.9 49.) 42..t -12.i -'2.1 .51. i 39.2 425
Vinyl chloride ND ().OJ ND(.'i.OJ ND (.'i.O) ND (1.0J ND (.'i.O) ND(2.0l ND (2.0) ND (2.0) ND(2.0J ND (2.0)
SVOCs (11g/L)
Nitr(lhcn1enc 10 ND (.'i.0) ND(.'i.O) 0,'I) ().)) ND(.'i.0) ND (.'i.0) ND(.'i.0) ;,...=t\ ;,...=t\ 0,'[) (5.0) NA
METALS TOTAL (11g/L)
Barium 2000 4.) .l ).0 J 'U J ,UJ ).4 .l 5 .5 J (,.3 .r 3.9 .1 3.5 .1 82.4 J
Beryllium 4 0.22 ND 0,98 lJJ {)_C)i;,...'() 0.32 ND 1.J ;,...:[) 0.22 ND 0.22 ND 0.26 ND 0.26 ND 0.26 ND
Lead 1.'i 1.2 ND 2.0 UJ 3.2 ND 1.2 ND 1.2 ND 3.8 ND 1.8 J 1.2 ND 1.4 ND 3 i J
~-1.ingancsc ){) :U.4 54.J .I 61Ui 45.0 41.0 .l 49.2 J :mo 40.(, ..i2 () 273
Nickel 100 1.9 J 0.93 .l 1.4 Nil 1.--t ND 1.8 J I .5 .I 1.8 J 1.1 ND 1. I ND I !ND
Notes: Bnlded Yalues indica1e detected corH.:entrntinn~ gn:atcr 1han rc111edintio11 goals
U,NO -not detected
J -detected, estimated result
UJ -not detected, estimated result
O -dilution sample
E -exceed calibration limit
B -found in blank
NA -not analyzed
Table E-1. GE Subsite -Performance Well Analytical Results. (continued)
Remediation
Parameter Goal
voes (µg/L)
1.2-Dii.:hloruct!wnc
lk11zc11c
Chlornform
cis-! .2-Dii.:h!urncthrnc 70
·1·l·trnchluruL'lhrne
trnns-1.2-Dichloructhcm: 70
Trichloroctlwnc 2.8
Vinyl chloride
SVOCs (µg/L)
NitrohenZL'lle 10
MET A LS TOT AL (fig/L)
Barium
Beryllium
Lead
Manganese
Nii.:kd
Notes:
U,ND -not detected
J -detected, estimated result
UJ -not detected, estimated result
D -dilution sample
E -exceed calibration limit
B • found in blank
NA• not analyzed
2000
4
15
50
100
MW-14A
Mar-03 Jun-03 Sep-03 Mar-04 Sep-04 Mar-05
ND (10.0) ND (10.0) ND (2.0) ND(40) 0.5 l J ND (2.0)
ND (5.0) ND(:i.0) i\'D ( !.O) i\!IJ (2.{JJ ND(l.UJ ND ('.UJ)
ND (JO.OJ ND (10.0J ND (2.UJ ND('-UJJ ND (2.0J ]\'[) (2.(JJ
12.9 !9.3 23.4 2 l.(, l (,. I 11.6
160 IS2 li7 200 169 ')5.5
ND(IO.OJ ND(IU.0) 0.65 J i\.'D (•I.OJ ND(2.0J ND ('.LUJ
32.7 39.2 40.i -12.1 28.4 I 7.0
i',!j) (5.0) NIJ (5.<)) ND (I.OJ ND (2.U) NIJ (I.OJ NIJ(2.UJ
NA ND (5.0) NU (5.IJ
3.6 J 2.2 J 3.1 J .. l_l) J 4.9 l3
0.26 N!J 0.26 ND 0.26 ND O.J ND 0.3 ND
6.0 ND 1.2 ND 1.2 ND 5.0 ND l.2ND 3.8 8
42.5 ---12.7 44.3 42.3 53.9 47.5
1.1 ND I. I ND l.! ND 1.7 J 1.5 B I I ND
!folded values ~ndii.:ate delt:eted t:OIHTlllrations greatt:r t!rnn remt·diation goals.
Sep-US Sep-06 Sep-07 Sep-08
ND ( 1.0) 0.53 J ND(l.0) l.U ND
Nil ( 10) ND (0.5J ND(l.OJ l.OND
NIJ ( !.0) ND (0.5) ND ( 1.0) l.O ND
31. I I tJ.3 22.0 !4.U
97.7 99A 97.0 1110,0
ND(l.U) ND (0.5) ND(l.OJ l.OND
21.0 16.6 15.0 16.U
NIJ(l.OJ NU (0.5) NIJ (I.OJ 1.0 ND
4.5 B 3.7 8 ND (15.0) 15.0 ND
6S.2 47.0 60.ll 50.0 ND
1.8 B I. I B NIJ (JOO 0) 100.0 ND
Table E-1. GE Subsite -Performance Well Analytical Results. (continued)
Remediation MW-15
Parameter Goal Scp-00 Dcc-00 Mar-0I .lun-0I Sep-OJ Dec-0 I i\"lar-02 .lun-02 Sep-02 Dcc-02
voe, (11g/L)
1.2-! )ichlmrn.::1h,111c r\'D CUJJ ND (2.0) ND (2.0J ND (2.0) ND (2.0) ND(2.0J i'•,11)(2_0) ND (2.0) ND (2.0J ND (2.0)
Bc111cnc ND(l.0) )'\'[) ( 1.0) ND (l.0) i\'D (I.OJ ND (I.OJ Nll(l 0) Nil{I.O) ND ( I.OJ i\1D (I.OJ Nil II 0)
ChlornJ(1rrn ND (2.0) ND (2.0J ND (2./Jl ND (2 0) ND (2.0) ND (2.m ND C~.<l) ND (2.(J) \JI) (2.0) ND (2.0)
ci~-1.2-Dichlnwcthcnc ;o ND (2.0) ND (2.0) ND (2.0) :-..1D (2.0) ND (2.0) ND(2.0} ND (2.0J ND (2.0) 7\TTJ (2.fl) ND (2.0)
Tc!rachlomc!hcnc Nil (2.0J ;-,,'[) (2.0) :'-,'I) (2 0) ND(2,0) 0'1) (2.0) ;\[) (2.0) 0,'J) {2.0) ;\'[) (2.0) 0.52 J 0.~7 .!
tr;ins:-1.2-! Jichl(1n1ethcm: ;o ND (2.0) 0,'[)(2,0) ;\.'1) (2_0) ND C.O) ;\.'I) (2_0) ND (2.0) ND(2.0J ND(2.0J ;,-..:[) (2.0) ;\.']) (2.0)
Trichlorm:thene :?..S ND (2.0) ND (2.ll) ND (2.0) ND (2.0) i\'D (2.0) ND(2.0) ND(2.0) ND (:?..0) ND {2.0J ND (2.0)
Vinyl chltiride ND (!.0) ND(l./)) ND (1.0) ND(\.0) ;-..'[) ( 1.0) ND(l.O) ND (1.0) ND(l.O) ND {1.0) ;-ill ( I.OJ
SVOCs (µg/L)
Ni1n1henn·ne 10 NIJ (S.O) ND (5.0) ND (S 5) ND (5.0) ND(:i.O) ND (.'i.0) NA N1\ ND (5.2) Ni\
METALS TOTAL (11g/L)
Barium 2000 192 .1 146 .1 23:'i ,, ' -·'-113 .I l 14 J S.'.4 J 47.2 .1 '.'3.0 .1 .':?..4 .1
Beryllium ' 0.42 ;\[) 0.:?.2 ND 2.7 ND 1.5 J 0.69 ND 0.57 .I 0.22 ;,...'!) 0.26 ND 0.26 ;,...'I) 0.26 i\'[)
Lead IS 2.6 .1 1.2 ND 15.2 22.9 I.:?. i\'D .'i.1>ND 2. 1 .I I.:?. ;,...1[) l . .'i ND l.2 ND
;,..-Jangane~l' ,'if) 1590 2650 2490 Ji JO 4600 .J 4;;0 .I 4430 ., JiSO 252fl ::::21J
Nickel 100 16.8 J 0.8 i\'[) 4_q ND 4.1 J 0.8 ;\[) l.4 .1 0.8 ND I 1 ND I IND l. 1 ND
Notes: B0ldcd value~ indii:ate detected concentration~ greater than remediation g0al~.
U,ND • not detected
J -detected, estimated result
UJ -not detected, estimated result
D • dilution sample
E -exceed calibration limit
B -found in blank
NA • not analyzed
Table E-1. GE Subsite -Performance Well Analytical Results. (continued)
Remediation
Parameter Goal
voes (µg/L)
I .2-!)ii.:hloroctlrnnc
lkrw:nc
Chloroforn1
..:is-1.2-Dichlorm:!hcnc
Tctr<.11.:h loroethcne
trans-1.2-Dichlorocthcm:
Trichloruclht·nc
Vinyl i.:hloridi.:
SVOCs (µg/L)
Nitrnhenzerw
METALS TOTAL (µg/L)
B.uium
lkryllillln
Lcud
!vlanganese
Nickel
Notes:
U,ND -not detected
J -detected, estimated result
UJ -not detected, estimated result
D -dilution sample
E -exceed calibration limit
B • found in blank
NA -not analyzed
JO
JO
2.8
10
2000
4
l 5
50
IOU
MW-15
Mar-03 Jun-03 Scp-03 Mar-04 Scp-04 Mar-05
ND{2.U) ND (2.0) ND (2.0) ND (2.0J ;\'1)(2.Q) NO(I.U)
ND I I.OJ NIJ (1.0} ND ( I.OJ ND ( I.OJ Nil I I.OJ ND(l.OJ
ND (2.0J ND (2.0J ND (2.0) ND 12.0) N!J !2.0J ND(l.O)
ND (2 0) NIJ(2.ClJ ND (2.0) ND (2.0) ND(2.0) ND I I.OJ
ND(2.0) ND(2.Ll) 0.73 J j\;[) (2.0) ND (2_0) ND ( 1.0)
ND (2.0) ND(2.0) ND ('.LO) ND(2.0J ND (2.0) ND ( I.OJ
ND/2.0) NIJ(2.Q) ND (2.0) 0,'0 {2.0) ND(2.o) 0,'D ( l.0)
l\'D (l .0) '.'iD I I.OJ Nll(I.OJ NlJ I I.OJ ND I I.OJ ND(l.U)
NA ND{5.0) ND(5.0J
31.1 J 28.2 J 36.2 .I 29.5 .I 37.5 B
0.26 ND 0.26 ND 0.26 ND U.3 ND 0.3 ND
1.6 J 1.2 ND 1.2 ND 1.4 Nil 1.2 ND 1.2 ND
3270 2720 1860 231HI 2670 2-l50
I.I ND I.I ND I I ND I.IND I.I B U.97 B
Boldt:d vulues indkate deti:i.:ted eonet'ntrations greall"r than remt'diation goals.
Sep-05 Sep-06 Scp-07 Sep-08
ND (!.0) ND {0.5) ND ( I.OJ l.0 ND
NIJ ( I.OJ ND \0.5) Nll(l.OJ !.O NJ)
ND (I OJ ND (0.5) ND ( 1.0) 1.0 ND
NIJ(l.OJ ND (0.5J ND {I.OJ 1.0 ND
ND(l.0) ND (0.5} ND(l.0) 1.0 ND
ND{l.0J ND (0.5J ND ( I.OJ 1.0 ;-,,10
ND(l.0) ND (0.5) NO ( I.OJ 1.0 ND
ND(l.0) ND (0.5) NlJ(l.UJ l.O ND
3.7 B l.7ND ND(l5.0J !5.0 ND
890 1510 2400 1500
14 B 0.8 ND ND (IUU.0) 100.0 ND
Table E-1. GE Subsite -Performance Well Analytical Results. (continued)
Remediation MW-16
Parameter Goal Sep-00 Dec-00 Mar-01 .Jun-01 Sep-01 Dec-01 Mar-02 Jun-02 Sep-02 Dec-02
voes (11g/L)
1.2-Didilnrot:thane ND (2.0) NDO.D) ND (2.0) ND (2 0) ND (2.0) ND (2.0) ;--.!]) (2.0) ND (2.0) ND (2.0) ND (2.0)
Benzene ND (1.0) ND(l.0) ND (1.0) ND(l.O) ND ( 1.0) ND ( 1.0) ND(l.0) ND ( I.OJ ND (I.OJ ND (!.0)
Chlornti.mn 0.89 .I ND(2.0) ND (2_0) ND (2.0) ?-,!I) (2.0) ND<2.0) ND (2.0) ND (2.0) ND(2.0) ND (2.0)
cis-l .2-1 )ich lorocthcnc 70 ND (2.0) 1.4 .I 2,_; l .8 .I 1.8 .I I 7 .I I .2 .J 0.86 J ()_<)] J 0.95 .1
Tctrach loroctb~·nc .45.4 21.S 24.1 23.2 2-U 2fl. ') 1:::i.S 11.4 <J.i 9.J
tram-I .:!-I Jichlt1n)Cllw11c 70 ND (2.0) ND(2.()) ND (2.0l ND {2.0) ND (2.0J ;'\'D(2.0) ND(:..OJ ND(2.0J ND (2.0J ND {2.0J
·rri ch l!1n1cthcnc 2.8 ND (2.0) I -I.I 1.0 .I 0.72.1 0.9 .l ND(2.0) 0.'.' ) ND (2.0) ND (2.0) ND (2.0J
Vinyl d1loridl' ND(l.OJ ND(!.O) ND(\.OJ ;,-11)(1_()) NIJ ( !.()) ND ( I.OJ NIJ(I 0) ND (1.0) ND (l.0} ND (1 OJ
SVOCs (11g/L)
Nilrnhl'fflClll' 10 :,...11) (:'i.[)) ;,...1[) (5.()) NIJ (5.5) ND (5.5) ND (5.0) ND(5.0) Nt\ NA ND (5.0) ;---.!t\
METALS TOTAL (11g/L)
Barium 2000 33.5 J 33.2 .1 3 7.4 .1 32, I J 33.0 .l 33.5 .1 34 5 J J 1.0 .! 33.9 .I 73. I J
Beryllium " 0.73 ND I I U.1 o.51 ;,...=o 0.22 ND 0,29 NIJ 0.22 ;,...'D fU.1 0.26 ND 0.38 .I 0.26 ND
Ll'ild 1 5 1.2 ND 2.2 U.1 1.2 ;,,.!f) 1.2 ND 2.2 ND 2.2 ND 3.1 .1· 1.2 ND 3.2 ND I .2 ;,...'f)
Manganl'sc 50 M1i 629 .J 67S 5S3 6IS 590 391 5-U, 566 6S~
Nickl'! 100 2.1 .l 0.95 .1 0.8 ND O.X ND O.X ND 0.8 ND 0.8 ND I. I ;\;[) I. I :\'D I l ND
Notes: BPldcd \'a!ucs indicate dl'tcc1cd concentrations grc;iter than rl'ml'diation gnak
U,ND • not detected
J • detected, estimated result
UJ • not detected, estimated result
D • dilution sample
E • exceed calibration limit
B • found in blank
NA • not analyzed
Table E-1. GE Subsite -Performance Well Analytical Results. (continued)
Remediation
Parameter Goal
voes (11g/L)
1.2-Dii.:hlorocthanc
!knzt:nc
Chloroflirm
cis-1.2-!Jichlorncthene
Tctrachlorocthc-nc
1rans-l .2-Dichlorocthene
Trichloroethen..:
Vinyl d1loride
SVOCs (µg/L)
Nitrnberw.:ne
METALS TOTAL (11g/L)
liarium
Bcrylllu111
Le.rd
Manganese
Nickel
Notes:
U,ND -not detected
J -detected, estimated result
UJ -not detected, estimated result
D • dilution sample
E -exceed calibration limit
B • found in blank
NA • not analyzed
70
70
2.8
10
2000
4
15
50
100
Mar-03
ND (2 0)
NIJ (I.OJ
ND {2.U)
ND (2.0)
5.2
ND(2.0J
NIJ (2.0)
Nil (1.0)
NA
32.3 J
0.26 i',!I)
J.2 ND
4S2
l,I ND
MW-16
Jun-03 Sep-03 Mar-04 Sep-04 Mar-05
NDC:LO) ND (2.0) NDCZ.o) ND (2.0) ND(I.OJ
ND ( 1.0) ND ( l .U) N!J (!OJ Nil I 1 OJ Nil (I.OJ
ND (2.0J NIJ (2.0} N!JCU)J NIJ(2.Cl) ND(l.0)
ND (2.0J ND (2.0J ND (2.0) ND(2.0) ND ( I.OJ
2.9 1.-1.J ND {2.0) l.i .J 0.93 J
ND(2.o) ND(2.o) ND(2.0J NIJ (2.U) ND (I.OJ
NIJ{2.0) ND {2.0) ND {2.0J ND (2.0) ND(l.0)
ND (I.OJ ND(l.0J ND(l.0J ND ( I.OJ ND(I.0J
ND \5.0) ND (5.0)
30.5 J 34.8 J 36. l J 39.0 B
0.26 ND 0.26 ND 0.3 ND 0.3 ND
l.2 ND !.2ND 1.5 ND 1.2 ND 1.2 ND
523-52() 4S2 (it)l) 573
I. I ND I I ND I.I ND 1.1 ND I I ND
!folded values indicate dctt·cted conccntralions greater 1han remediation goals.
Sep-05 Sep-06 Sep-07 Sep-08
Nll(I.0J ND (0.5) ND(!.U) l.OND
Nil I I.OJ NU (0.5) ND (I.OJ !.O ND
ND(l.0) ND (0.5) ND(l.0) 1.0 ND
ND ( I.OJ NIJ{0.5J ND(l.0J l.O ND
I. I 0.56 J ND(LO) I.ONO
NlJ(l.0J ND (0.5/ ND { I.OJ 1.0 ND
Nll(I.0J ND (0.5) Nil (I.OJ I.ONO
Nil ( I.OJ ND (0.5J Nil ( I.OJ !.O l\'[J
2.4 B 3.1 B ND (15.0) !5.0ND
72S 620 5-W 510
I I ND O.S ND ND (IU0.0) I U0.0 ND
Table E-1. GE Subsite -Performance Well Analytical Results. (continued)
Rrmcdiation MW-16A
Parameter Goal Sep-00 Dec-00 Mar-0I .lun-0I Sep-0I Dcc-0I Mar-02 Jun-02 Scp-02 Dcc-02
voe, (r•giL)
l .2-l)ii;hlnrnclh<111c ;-..!!)(10.0) ND (10.n) ND(-Ul) ND (2.0l 0.-1()) ND(4.0) ND(40J ND {;-LO) I. I .I 1.3 .I
Bcnzcnc ND (5.0) ;'\1[) (5.0) ;,...•[) C:Ul) 0.88 J I. I I.J .I ND (2.0) NlJ CUl) NU (2.0) 0,'[) (2.0)
Chlorot(irm ND(!0.0J :--.'D (IO.OJ NIJ (4.n) ND(2.0) 0.55 J ND (-1.0) ND (·l.O) ND (•LO) NIJ (J.0) ~fl (40)
cis-1.2-Dichlnrncthrnc 7() 12.9 11.8 12.5 13.2 .I 14.0 29.1 1-U, 67.1 68.-1 56.5
Tctn1<:hloroc1hrnc 19-1 12i 9-1.4 S9.8 .J !02 !:ii 58.(, 130 1.51 182
1ran~-1.2-D1chloroctl1enc 70 ND(I0.0) Nil (In 0) ND (,-I.OJ ND (2.0) 0.57 .l ND (4.0) ND (4.0) ND (•Ul) NIJ H n1 0-'D (4.0)
Trichl(irocihcnc 2.8 6.9 .I 6.2 .J 5.2 5.-1.1 5.6 7.2 4.1 6.4 7.2 i.ll
Vi11~ 1 d1lt1ridc ND(S.0) ND (5.0) ND (2.0) ND(l.O) ND (1.0) ND (2.0) ND(2.0) ND (2.0J ND(2.(JJ ND(::!.0J
SVOCs (11g/L)
Ni!rohcnzcnc 10 ND (5.0) ND(5.Q) i\,I[) ()_)) ND {5.5) ;,m(:'i.0l j\l[J (:'i.0J NA NA ND (5.1) i'\'A
MF:TALS TOTAL (µg/L)
Barium 2000 9.8 J 1 0.6 .1 16 . .' .1 I S.9 J 16.9 .1 16.3 .l I 3.0 J J.t()J 13.2 .l 3.3 .I
Beryllium ➔ 059 ND 0.92 lJ.1 0...18 ND 0.22 ND 0.22 0,'D 0.22 ;-...'D 0.22 ND 0.26 ND 0.26 ND 0.26 ND
Le.id 15 1.2 ND 1.6 U.1 2.7 ND l .2 ND 1.2 ND 2.0 ND l.2 ND 1.2 ND 1.2 ND 1.2 ND
Mangani.:~c )() 167 192 .I 192 166 258 2-H 328 IJS 132 47.8
Nici-cl 100 32.1 30.6 .1 17.S ND ! 6.8 .! 27.6 .I ! S.3 J 10.2 .! l S. 7 .I 17.1 .1 I. 1 ;-,...1[)
Notes: Bn!dcd values indicate detected concrntr:itinns grc:i!cr than rc111cdi:i1io11 gnah
U,ND -not detected
J -detected, estimated result
UJ -not detected, estimated result
D -dilution sample
E • exceed calibration limit
B -found in blank
NA -not analyzed
Table E-1. GE Subsite -Performance Well Analytical Results. (continued)
Remediation
Parameter Goal
voes (µg/L)
1.2-Dichloroeth.inL'
Benzene
Chloroform
i.:is-l ,2-!Jid1lornctht'nc
·re1nu.:hloroethem·
uans-1.2-1 )iehloroc1hrne
Trii.:hlorot·thrnc
Vinyl chloride
SVOCs (µg/L)
Nitrnbrnzi.:nt:
META LS TOTAL (µg/L)
Bmium
Beryllium
Lead
j\·langancst:
Nickel
Notes:
U,ND -not detected
J -detected, estimated result
UJ -not detected, estimated result
D • dilution sample
E • exceed calibration limit
B -found in blank
NA • not analyzed
70
70
2.8
10
2000
4
15
50
100
Mar-03
Nil I 10.0)
ND(5.0J
ND(IU.OJ
66.2
22N
ND (10.0)
8.8 J
;-,..11) (5.0J
NA
I 2. 7 J
026 ND
l.6 NI)
6S.4
l).O J
MW-16A
.Jun-03 Sep-03 Mar-04 Scp-04 Mar-05
I.I J 1.2 .I 1.7 ., 1.2 J ND(2.0J
ND(l.0J Nil I 1.0) ND (2.0J ND(l.0) NDO.OJ
0.73 J 0.71 J ND ('-LU) U.65 J ND (2.0)
56.4 60.4 65. l 50.3 42.4
183 201 160 162 I Jl)
ND (2.0J NIJ(2.0J ND (4.0J ND 0.0} ND cro,
5.7 6.9 6.8 5.0 . .,
ND(l.OJ ND(l.UJ ND (2.0) ND (I.OJ ND (2.0)
ND (5.0) ND (5.0)
11.6 .I 13 .2 J 14.5 J 15.0 B
0.26 ND 0.26 ND 0.3 ND 0.3 ND
1.2 ND 1.2 ND UNI) 1.2 j\'J) 1.2 NI)
Si.S 3 I. 7 23.l 79.S 16.i
8.7 .I 7. 7 J 12.5 J 8. I B 2.7 B
Boldt:d \'alui.:s in1fo:.iti.: di.:tei.:1nJ i.:oni.:i.:nlralions grcatt:r 1ha11 rrn1i.:Jiation goals.
Sep-05 Sep-06 Sep-07 Scp-08
0.96 J ND (1.0) ND ( 1.0) 1.0/\!D
ND (1.0) ND ti.OJ ;-,m(I.0J 1.0 l\'D
ND { !.0) ND(l.OJ ND ( I.OJ l.UND
52.7 37.8 46.0 32.0
159 1.io 160 150
ND (I.OJ ND (1.0) ND(I.U) 1.0 ND
6.2 H 5.tl 5.0
ND(l.OJ ND {I.OJ 1\D (I.OJ 1.0 )\![)
1.2 ND 1.8 B ND(l5.0) 15.0 ND
I 7.3 6.3 !3 110 60.0
2.9 B 3.0 B ND (100.0) 100.0 ;'\11)
Table E-1. GE Subsite -Performance Well Analytical Results. (continued)
Remediation MW-22A
Parameter Goal Scp-00 Dcc-00 Mar-01 ,Jun-01 Sep-0 I Dcc-0 I Mar-02 .Jun-02 Scp-02 Dec-01
voes (µg/L)
! .2-! )ichloroethm1c ND (2.0) j\'J) (2.0) 0-1[) (2.0) ND (2.0) ND (2.0) ND (2.0) ND C.OJ ND (2.0J ;,...'[) (2.0) ND (2.0)
Bcn/.cne ND(l.0) ,:I) ( I.OJ ND (1.0) ND(l.()) ,c[l (I.OJ ND(l.0) Ml(l.O) ND (1.0) ND (1.0) ND (1.0)
Chlnrnforrn ND (2.0) ND (2.0) ND (:._O) ND (2.0) ND/2.0) 0,'[) (2.0) ND CZ.o) ND(2.0) ND (2.0) ND(2.0)
cis-l .2-Dii.:hlorm·thrnc 7ll 0.95 J ND (2.0) ND (2.0) 1.3 .1 0.68 .I ND {2.0) 0.82 .1 I I .I I.I .1 1.3 .J
Tctrnchlon1cthcnc -'4.9 -10.2 -10.6 41.4 JUl 36.S Jfl.2 J 1.5 32.1 -12.9
Jrans-1.2-Dichlorncthenc 70 ND (2.0) ND(2.()) ND (2.0) i\'D (2.0) ND(Vl) j\'[) (2 0) ND (2.0) ND (2.0J ND (2 OJ ND (2.0J
Trichlnrocthl·nt· 2.8 0.8:!J :-..:D {2.0) ND(2.o) ND(2.0) ND (2.0) ND(2.0) 0 . .36 .1 j\'[) (2.0) ND CUJ) ND(2.0)
Vinyl chloride ND(l.0) ,cD(l.OJ ,c[)(l.ll) ND(l.0) ND(l.O) cell (I 0) :<ll(l.ll) ND (I.OJ ND(l.O, ND(l.0)
SVOCs (µg/L)
Nitn1hcnzcnc Ill ND (5.0) ND (5 0) ND {5.0) ND (5.5) ND{).0} ND (5.0) NA NA ND (5.0) NA
METALS TOTAL (µg/L)
Barium 2000 13.2 .I 13.5 .I 21. 1 .1 12.3 .I 1--U.1 13.9 J 11. 7 J t 1.2 J 13.3 J l 2.5 J
Beryllium 4 0.54 ND 0.67 ND 0.38 ND 0.22 ND 0.53 ND 0.22 ;-,.JD 0.45 J 0.26 ND 0.26 ;'-,;[) 0.26 ND
Lead l 5 1.2 ND 1.3 ND 2.4 ND l.2 ND l.2 ND 3.5 ND l.2 ND 1.2 ND 1.2 ND 1.2 ;--..'I)
Manganesr 50 6.5 ND 4.0ND 6.8 J 5.3 J 5.9 J 6.1 J 5.5 .I 3 .3 J 4.2 J 3.9 .l
i\'ickd 100 2.3 ND 08ND 0.8 NJJ 0.8 ND 0.8 ND 0.8 ND 0.8 ND I.I ND I !ND 1.1 ND
Notes: B<ilded values indicate dctcc\cd conccntratinns greater than remediation goals.
U,NO • not detected
J. detected, estimated result
UJ • not detected, estimated result
D . dilution sample
E • exceed calibration limit
B • found in blank
NA • not analyzed
Table E-1. GE Subsite -Performance Well Analytical Results. (continued)
Remediation
Parameter Goal
voes (µg/LJ
1.2-Dii.:hlorol'thanc
UL·nzenc
Chlorofon11
i.:is-l ,2-Did1lorm:1hcnc
·rc1rachloroe1henc
trans-1.2 -Dichlornethcne
'l'richlorm:thene
Vinyl d1loridc
SVOCs (µg/L)
;-,,'iuobenzene
METALS TOTAL (ftg/L)
Barium
BL·rylliu1n
LL·ad
i\·langa1wsc
Nii.:ki:!
Notes:
U,ND -not detected
J -detected, estimated result
UJ -not detected, estimated result
D -dilution sample
E -exceed calibration limit
B -found in blank
NA -not analyzed
71l
70
2.S
10
2000
4
15
50
IOU
MW-22A
Mar-03 Jun-03 Sep-03 Mar-04 Sep-04 Mar-05
ND (2.U} ND (2.0J ND(2.0) ND(2.0) ND(2.0) ND ( I.OJ
ND(l.U) ND{!.OJ ND(l.OJ ND ( I.OJ ND (I.OJ ND(l.O)
ND (2.UJ ND{2.0J ND(2.0) ND (2.0) ND (2 U) ND(l.0)
1.-1 J 1.X J 24 2.l 2A 2'!
-H.S -16.7 59.6 52.1 ii.i S-U1
ND (2.0) N!J (2.UJ NO (2.0J i\'!) (2.0) ND (2.0) ND(l.O)
N!J(2.UJ 1.6 J U.98 J 0.55 J 0.67 J 0.98 J
ND (I.OJ ND (I.OJ ND (1.0) ND (I.OJ ND { 1.0) ND (I.OJ
NA ND(5.0J ND(5.0J
I l.8 .1 13.0 J 14.9 .J 1-t.6 .l 17,5 B
0.26 ND U.26 ND 0.26 ND 0.3 ND U.3 ND
1.7 J 1.2 ND 1.2 ND 2.U ND 1.2 ND 5.0
➔. I J 4.6J 6.4 J -1.(> J 16.7 HB
1.1 ND !.I ND 1.1 ND l.l ND !.IND 1.1 ND
Boldi.:d values indii.:ute dr.:IL'l.:lt"d i.:oni.:entrntions greuter than rL'lllt'dimion goals.
Sep-05 Sep-06 Sep-07 Scp-08
ND(l.0) ND(0.5) ND(l.UJ l.OND
ND (I.OJ ND (U.5J ND(l.UJ !.0ND
ND(l.lJJ ND (0.5} NDll.0) 1.0 ND
1.6 1.9 l.U 1.U
6-1.8 63.6 29.11 21.0
ND{l.UJ ND (0.5J ND{I.UJ I.OND
ND (I.OJ U.58 J ND(!.U) LO ND
Nil 11.llJ ND IUSJ ND (I.UJ 1.U NIJ
2.6 B 2.LJ B ND(l5.0) 15.U ND
5.9 B 8.-+ B ND (50.0) 50.U ND
!.I ND 0.8 ND ND(IOO.O) 100.0 ND
Table E-1. GE Subsite -Performance Well Analytical Results. (continued)
Remediation MW-27
Parameter Goal Scp-00 Dcc-00 Mar-OJ .Jun-OJ Scp-0 J Dec-OJ Mar-02 .Jun-02 Sep-02 Dec-02
voe, <r•giL)
l .2-Dichlnroethanc ND (2.0) ND (2.0) ND (2.0) ND (2.0) ND (2.0) ND (2_0) ND (2.0) ;-..,1[) (2.()) i",'[) (2_0) ;,..•[) (2.0)
!kn,.cne ND(l.0) ND (1.0) ND(l.0) ND(l_O) ND (1.0) ND (1.0) ND(l.0) ND ( I.OJ ND (1.0) ;-...'D (1.0)
Chlornfonn ND(2.0) ND(2.0J ND (2.0) ND {2.0) ND (2.0) ND (2.0) ND (2.0) ND C:!.o) ND(2.0) NO (2.0)
c1s-l .2-! Jichl(1wcthenc 70 56.-1 50.6 39.7 39.-+ 25.3 1 X.5 l (, __ -. 16. 7 1-1.6 l 1. -I
Tctrnchlorrn.:lhcne .i2.2 ., J<1.3 27.-1 335 2-1.5 22.') 19.0 23.1 22.3 16.'J
tran~-1.2 -! Jicht(,HlC!hcnc 70 ND(2.0) ;-,mc.01 ND(2.0) ;,...'I) (2.0) ND (2.0) ND (2.0) i's'[) /2.0} ;,...·!) CUl} ()_()] J ;,-;[J {2.0)
Tri ch lnrrn:t hcr1l' 2.8 13.7 14.1 10.6 11.J i.S <,,') 6,9 "i.J 7.0 -ti
Vinyl chlnride Nll(IO) ND ( 1.0) 2.S 2.6 2.7 1.(1 I.I 2.6 2.6 2.0
SVOC, (µg/L)
Nitwhenzene 10 ND (5.0) ND (:'i.0) l\'D (5.0} ND(S.0) ND(S,0} ND (5.0) NA NA ND (5.2) NA
METALS TOTAL (fig/L)
Barium 2000 RQ.0 J 82.0 J 85.4 .1 83.R J RS.S .1 78.R J 92.8 .1 90.1 .1 93, 7 J 20.9 .1
Beryllium 4 0.22 ND 0.J6 ND UND 0J6 A'D 0.R.'JND 0.22 ND o.nND 0.26 0-'[) I.SJ 0.26 ND
Lc□d l S 1.2 ND !.2 ND 2.2 0-'[) 1.2 ND 1.2 ND 3.1 ND 3 .5 J 1.2 ND ..\_..\ ND 1.2 ND
lvlangane:-e so 143 21..\ .I 49~ 323 2(17 .I J-11 .I 920.J 691 -Ii-I :'i-1
:-.!ickcl 100 1.4 J I IND 1.7 A1D 1.8 ND 0.8 ND !.-+.I 0.86 .1 I .I ND ! .6 .1 I IND
Notes: [folded v:ilues indicate dc1ectcd co11ccntra11011s gre.itcr than remediation go:1!:-
U,ND -not detected
J. detected, estimated result
UJ -not detected, estimated result
D -dilution sample
E -exceed calibration limit
B -found in blank
NA -not analyzed
Table E-1. GE Subsite -Performance Well Analytical Results. (continued)
Remediation
Parameter Goal
voes (µg/L)
l ,2-Dichlorm:lhane
Bl'nzenc
Chlorofom1
cis-l ,2•Dich!ornethene
Tctrn..:hlorocthem·
lrans• l ,2-!Jichlomethenc
Trichlorol.'thcne
Vinyl dtlorit.k
SVOCs (µg/L)
Nitmhcll/.t.'lll'
METALS TOTAL (µg/L)
Burium
B1.:ryllium
Le;_itl
M:1ng.inese
Nickel
Notes:
U,ND • not detected
J • detected, estimated result
UJ • not detected, estimated result
D • dilution sample
E • exceed calibration limit
B • found in blank
NA • not analyzed
70
70
2.8
10
2000
'
15
50
IOU
Mar-113
NIJ (2.0)
ND (I.OJ
ND(2.0J
9,3
18.6
!.2 J
SJ,
l.i
Nt\
84.5 J
0.26 ND
7 .0 ;-,..11)
iii
1.1 ND
MW-27
Jun-03 Sep-03 Mar-04 Sep-04 Mar-05
ND (2.0) ND (2.0) NIJ (2.0) ND (2.0) Nil (I.OJ
ND{l.UJ ND (I.OJ ND ( ! .UJ Nil (I OJ U.58 J
ND{2.(JJ ND (2.0) ND (2.0) NIJ(2.0) ND { 1.0)
13.3 17.2 JU. I 6. 7 13A
16.-1 16.6 10.5 9.2 IJ.0
j\.'i) (2.0) 0,'D (2.U) ND (2.U) ND(2.UJ ND(l.0J
8.8 7.4 5.0 0.3 7.7
3.2 3.2 1.9 1.6 2.4
ND (5.1) ND{5.0J
80.lJ J 82.--t J i6.8 J 8().6 B
0.26 ND 0.26 ND 0.3 NO 0.3 ND
1.2 ND l .2 ND 2.3 ND 1.2 ND 1.2 ND
647 593 64<i 732 726
I I ND l. l ND 1.l NO l.9 B 1.6 H
Boldctl values i11tlicate tlet~·e1etl eo11eL'!ltratio11~ grcat~·r th.111 rrn1etliation goal.,;
Sep-05 Sep-06 Scp-07 Sep-08
Nll(I.OJ ND (0 5) ND(I.OJ I.ONll
0.82 .I 0.64 .I NIJ ( I.OJ 1.0 ND
Nll(I.OJ ND (0.5) ND ( 1.0) 1.0 ND
1-1.9 11.6 11.0 6.0
22.-1 26.-l J.UJ 18.0
i\'D(l.UJ ND (0.5) ND { !.OJ 1.0 ND
12.1 1-1.J 16.0 s.o
2.3 1.8 1.0 l.O ND
l.9 B I. 7 ND ND(!:i.0J !5.0 ND
651 693 6SO 610
l.6 B 0.8 ND NIJ (IOU.OJ I 00.0 ND
Table E-1. GE Subsite -Performance Well Analytical Results. (continued)
Remediation MW-27A
Parameter Goal Scp-00 Dcc-00 Mar-01 .Jun-01 Scp-01 Dcc-0 I i\lar-02 .Jun-02 Scp-02 Dcc-02
voes (µg/L)
1.2-1)1chlornc1hanc 2.S 3.0 .I 2.3 3.3 J.S .I 2.9 J.6 H 3.0 -1.6
Benzene "IJ(l.01 NDC~.o} ND(l.0) ND (!.0) ND (2.0) )\'[) (1.0) N!J(I.O) ND 12.0J NlJ (2.(1) 0,'[) (2.0)
Chlnnlf(1n11 ND (2.0) ND (4.0) ND {2.0) 0,'I) (2.0) ND (•1.0) NI} (2.0) ND(2.o) ND(4.0) >!J) (4 0) ND (,.I_O)
cis-1.2-Di.:11loroc1hc11c ;o 3 8.3 -+2.2 3-U -1-1.7 ..t7.5 36.6 4(1.:'i 44 9 -16.-+ 48.3
Tc1rachlornl'thl'nc ND (2_0) ND (4.0) 3.2 ND (2.0) N!J (,-1.0) ND (2.0) i\![)(2.0) l.O .1 Nl}(4_0J ND (,LO)
tran:c--l .2-l)ichl\1rocthcnc 70 Nl>C.()) ND (4.0) ND (2.0) ;,..;I) (2.0) ND (4.0) ;,('I) (2.0) ND (2.0J ND(4.0J 1 7 J ND (4.0)
Trichl(lroeihcnc 2.8 I 14 114 S0.6 100.0 .I 114 S6.4 IOS IOS 1116 I 19
Vinyl chloride ND (!.OJ ND (2.0) Nil (1.01 ND (1 _OJ 0.88 .1 Nil (I.II) 0.73 .l ;--!I) C.O) ND (2.0) ND(2.0)
SVOCs (µg/L)
;-...'itrnhrnzcnr 10 ND (S 0) ND(S.0) ND/5.0) ND (5.0) ND (S.OJ :,..,•[) (5.0) NA Nt\ ND (S 2) Nt\
METALS TOTAL (ftg/L)
Banum :woo 122 .I 91 ,--1. J 97.0 .1 88.7 .1 82.9 .I 85.4 .I 87. 7 .I i-0.2 .1 8(,.() J 1(,_ 9 J
!kry!!ium 4 O.SJ J 0.41 ND 1.S )\'[) fl.27 ND OAS ND 0.22 ND 0.22 ND 0.26 ;\'D 0A4J 0.26 ND
Lead l 5 1.6 .1 1.2 ND 2.4 ND 1.2 ND 2.1 ND 2.7 ND 1.6 J !.2 NO 3.3 ND 1.2 ~•[)
Manganese 50 295 276 .I JOI :\I> 293 2S~ .J 279 .I 27~ .I 273 301 0.16 ND
Nickel 100 6. ! J 3.8 ND 3.3 ND 3.4 ND 2. 7 J 2.7 J 1. I J I 1 i'\'D 2. 7 J 1. I :,..,•[)
Notes: Bolded value~ indicate dctec1ed conccn1rations greater lhan remediation goals.
U,ND -not detected
J • detected, estimated result
UJ -not detected, estimated result
D -dilution sample
E -exceed calibration limit
B -found in blank
NA -not analyzed
Table E-1. GE Subsite -Performance Well Analytical Results. (continued)
Remediation
Parameter Goal
voe, (µg/L)
l .2-Did1lurot·1hanc
lknzt:nc
Chloroform
cis-J ,2-l)i-:h luroclhcnc
Tetrnch!oru..:thcnt·
trans-1.2-Di.:hlornr.:thcm:
'J'rich!onicthcne
Vinyl chloride
SVOCs (11g/L)
Nitrubenzene
METALS TOTAL (µg/L)
Bari urn
13i:ryl!iu111
Lead
Manganese
Nii.:kcl
Notes:
U,NO • not detected
J • detected, estimated result
UJ • not detected, estimated result
D -dilution sample
E -exceed calibration limit
B • found in blank
NA • not analyzed
70
70
2.S
10
2000
<
15
50
100
MW-27A
Mar-03 .Jun-03 Sep-OJ Mar-04 Sep-04 Mar-05
3.9 4.7 4.3 4.3 5.1 J.6
ND { I.OJ ;-,_11) ( I.OJ ND(l.U) ND (I.OJ ND(l.UJ ND(l.UJ
NDt2.0J ND (2.0) ND (2.0) ND (2.0) ND(2.0) ND(l.())
40.8 43. 7 37.1 3-U 33. l 31.5
ND(2.U) 1.5 J VJ 3.1 2.J 2.8
U.68 J ND(2.0J Nil (2.U) 1'-'D (2.UJ ND(2.0J ND ( 1.0)
IOI 113 911.5 S-U 1-15 109
0.76 .1 1.3 U.%.1 0.65 J 0 77 J 0.82 J
NA ND (5.0) ND (5.0J
85.0 J 77.2 .1 75.5 .l 75.9 .1 73.5 B
0.26 )\'I) 0.26 ND 0.26 ND 0.3 NLJ 0.3 ND
4.5 ND l.2 ND 1.2 ND 8.2 NLJ 3.1 B 4.8 B
278 292 281 ,-, _,_ 288 252
l.l ND I.! ND I. I ND 1.8 J 2.9 B 2.0 B
Bolded values indkate tktected i.:uncenlra!ions greater than remediation goals.
Sep-05 Sep-06 Sep-07 Sep-08
5.3 5.2 ND ( 1.0} 3.tl
ND ( !.U) ND (0.5) ND(l.U) 1.0 ND
ND(!.U) ND (0.5) N!J ( LO) LU ND
34.--1 20.S 13.0 11,0
3.1 1.9 J.O 2.0
ND {1.0) ND (0.5) ND (I.OJ l.0 ND
99.0 70.3 89.0 95.0
ND (1.0) ND (0.5) ND(l.O) 1.0 ND
5.0 l.i ND ND (!5.0) 15.0 ND
257 275 260 )I)()
l.7H 1.4 B ND ( JOO.OJ 100.0 ND
Table E-1. GE Subsite -Performance Well Analytical Results. (continued)
Remediation MW-29
Parameter Goal Scp-00 Dcc-00 Mar-01 .lun-01 Scp-0 I Dcc-0 I Mar-02 .Jun-02 Scp-02 Dcc-02
voes (11g/L)
! .2-Dichlomcthanc ND (2.0) ;,,..11) (2.0) ND(2.0) Nn C"!.Q) 0.)6 J ;,,;I) (2.0) ND (2.0) i\'D C2.0) O.:i :i J ND (2.0J
lknzcn~· ND (1.0) "'" ( 1.0) ND (1.0) Nil (I .ill i\'[) (1 OJ ND(I.C)) i\'!J ( I 0) :---'D { ! .0) i\'D ( l .OJ ND ( l.0)
Chlnrofonn ND(2.fl) ;-.,'I) (2.0) NDC.O) Nl> (2.0) ND 12.0) ND (2.0'J ND (2.0) ND (2.0) ND (2.0) NDC./J)
ci~-1.2-Dt1.:hh1rrn:tl11:·11e 70 2.5 2.2 4.1 I_() J 2 :i u _,A 3.-+ _,_s 3.9
·1·ct me hlorocthrnc 26.3 23.1 -12.0 17.2 30.2 33.6 J-1.2 36.i J6,6 '.'O.i
1ra11~-l .2-D1chk1nicthr11c 70 ND (2.0) ;\.'I) (2.0) ND C.O) ND C2.0) NIJC.o) 0-'J) (2_0) ND(2.0l ;,..!I) (2.0) ND (2.0J ;'-.'I) C.0)
rrichl<1rnclhl·ne 2.S ND (2.0) ND (2.0) ND (2.0) ND (2.0) ND (2.0) ND (2.0) 0_-1() .r O.:i--1 .1 ND (2.0l 0 . .'-1 J
Vinyl d1lnride ;\.'[) ( I _OJ ;--.'[) ( 1.0) ND (!.OJ ;--.'!) (l ,0) ;,-.rl) ( !.()) ;,,._:[) (1.0) ;,,._:I) ( 1 _()) MJ!I.OJ ND (I.OJ ;,,.,•[) (1.0)
SVOCs (µg/L)
;\.'itrnhcnzene )(} ND(.'i.0) ND (.'i.0J i\'D (5 . .'i) ND (5.5) ;--_•[) (5 OJ NIJ (5.0) N,\ N1\ ND (5.4) NA
METALS TOTAL (11g/L)
Barium 2000 67.8 .1 68. 1 J 73 .3 .I 6().4 .I 72.--1 .I 68.2 .l 77 1 J 69.9 .1 70.2 J 60 . .'i J
Beryllium 4 0.22 ND 0.92 ND 0.57 ND 0.22 ND 1.0 J 0.27 ND 0.~8 J 0.26 ND 0.26 ND 0.26 ND
Lead 15 1.2 ND 2.1 ND l.2 ;,,..'!) 1.2 ND 1.2 ND 1.91\'D I .6 J 1.2 ;,,..•!) 1.2 ND 1.2 ND
~vlanganese 50 2.3.0 ;--.'[) 20.7 20.1 21.2 22.8 J 1 7.5 22.S 18.0 ]()_I 15. 5
Nickel 100 13.9 .l 0.8 ND 0.8 ;\'!) --1.9 .1 o.8 ;,,.,•o 0.8 ND 0.8 ND I ! ;,,..'[) 1.1 ;,,..'!) I IND
Notes: 8{1lded values indicate detected cnnccntration., greater than remediation goal.-;_
U,ND -not detected
J -detected, estimated result
UJ -not detected, estimated result
D -dilution sample
E -exceed calibration limit
B -found in blank
NA · not analyzed
Table E-1. GE Subsite • Performance Well Analytical Results. (continued)
Remediation
Parameter Goal
voes (11g/L)
! .2-Dkhluroctlumc
Be111:c1H:
Chlurofonn
i.:is-! ,2-J)ii.:hlurocllwnc
·rc1ruchlornl'lhcne
trnns-I ,2-lJii.:hlorncthenc
Trkhlurocthrne
Vinyl i.:hloridc
SVOCs (µg/L)
Nitrnbcn7.enc
METALS TOTAL (µg/L)
Barium
Beryllium
Lead
/Vlangancsc
Nickel
Notes:
U,ND -not detected
J -detected, estimated result
UJ • not detected, estimated result
D -dilution sample
E • exceed calibration limit
B -found in blank
NA -not analyzed
70
70
2.8
10
2000
➔
15
50
100
MW-29
Mar-03 Jun-03 Sep-03 Mar-04 Sep-04 Mar-05
ND (2.0) ND(2.0) 0,98 J 0.88 J 0.86 .I ND(l.OJ
ND (l .U) ND I IUJ Nil I I .OJ ND ( l .OJ NI) { l.U) ND ( ! .O}
NIJ (2.0J ND (2.0J ND (2.0) ND (2.0) ND (2.0) ND (1.0)
3.5 5 ,8 13. l 8.lJ 9.8 ➔.➔
-IS.5 57.J (41 90.6 11J -18.0
ND (2.0J ND (2.UJ ND(2.UJ N!J (2.U} ND (2.U} ND(l.O)
U.58 .I 0.86 J 2.0 l .2 .1 1.5 J 0.67 J
ND(!.OJ ND ( I.OJ NIJ ( 1.0) ND ( 1.0) 0,IIJ(l.Ll} ND ( l.0)
NA ND (5.0) ND (5.0)
71.2 J 72.6 J 66.4 J 80.9 J 72.6 B
0.26 ND 0.26 ND 0.26 ND 0.3 ND 0.3 ND
2.8 J 1.2 ND l.2ND 1.6 0,'I) 1.2 ND 3.5 H
19.6 19.7 13.2 J ,, ' _,., __ 32.5 22.6
I I ND 1.1 ND !.I ND (( J 1.2 B l.l ND
Bolded values indi..:a\!.: {.kh:t:tt:d t:tmcc111rn1io11s grcaln than rc1ncdia1iu11 goals
Sep-05 Sep-06 Sep-07 Sep-08
ND(l.O) ND (0.5J NIJ ( I.OJ 1.0 ND
ND ( l.U) ND (0.5J Nil ( I OJ l.O ND
ND (1.0) ND (0.5) ND ( 1.0) l.O ND
,.t_(J U.69 J ND ( I.OJ l.O ND
-1-UJ 6.4 -l.O 2.0
ND (I.OJ ND (U.5} NlJ(l,OJ l.OND
0.(18 J ND (0.5) ND ( I.OJ 1.0 ND
ND ( IOJ ND (0.5J Nll ( I.OJ l.0NIJ
2.2 l3 1.9 ll ND(l5.0J 15.0 ND
19.8 19.0 ND (50.0) 50.0 ND
1.1 ND 0.8 ND ND (IOU.OJ 100.0 ND
Table E-1. GE Subsite -Performance Well Analytical Results. (continued)
Remediation MW-3
Parameter Goal Scp-00 Dcc-00 Mar-OJ .lun-01 Scp-0 J Dcc-0 J l\:lar-02 .Jun-02 Sep-02 Dcc-02
voe, 01g/L)
I .2-l)id1lnrnc1ha11c ;\'I) (2.0) ND (2.0) ND (2.0) ND (2.0) ;"\'[) ( 2.0) ND (2.0) Nll (2.0) ND (2.0) NDC.Ol ND (2.0)
lk111.cnc ND (!.O) 0,'[) (I.fl) ND ( l.0) ND ( l.0) NI> (1.0) ;-/\) (1.0) ;,-:I) ( 1 .0) ND(I.OJ ND (I.OJ "\) (1.0)
Chlnrofom1 L\'[) (?..0} ND (2.0J ND (?..O) ND (2.0) 1',11) (2.o) ND {2.0) ND(2,0) NDC.Ol ND(2.0) ND (2.0J
i..:i~-1.2-1 )ichlnn1ethcm' 70 2.5 3.0 41 .i.8 " 2.5 46 4.0 --t.6 4 <)
Tctrnchlorocthcnr 1.8 .I 4.1 6.2 3.4 l.J ,I I .S .J 3.3 2.4 2.n 1.6 .I
tra11~-l .2 -1 )ich lnroelhcm: 70 ND (2.0) ND (2.0) ND (2.0) ND (2.0) ND(2_()) ;'\;1)(2.()) ND (2_0J 7''D CUlJ ND(?.OJ ND (2.0)
Trid1lnrrn:tht·nc 2.8 I _9 J 4.2 '-" 4.4 ! .8 .I 2.:'-'-" 3.4 J.i 2. 7
Vin~·I dilnride "[) (1.0) ND ( 1.0) ND(l.0) :-CD ( UI) Nl)(I_O) 7','[) ( I.OJ 0. iS .! l\'D { I .0) 0.57 .1 l\'[) (l.0)
SVOCs (11~/L)
Nitrnhcnzcnc 10 ND/5.0) ND (5.0) ND (5.fl) ;\.'D (5.0) ND (5.0) NI) (5.0) N1\ ;\'A ND (5.IJ NA
META LS TOTAL (11g/L)
Barium 2000 22.9 J 45.9 J 42.4 J J4.5 J 3 I .8 .1 -14.1. I 3--Ul J 2(,.8 .1 26 .. ; J 17.2 .I
Beryllium 4 0.22 ND 0.76 [J.J l.~ ND 0.22 ND 0.3 ND O 22 ND 0.22 0,']) 0 26 N!J 0.26 ND 0.26 [\'[)
I.cad Ii 1.2 ND I.:' l.i.l 2.8 ND 1.2 ND 2.6 l\'D 1_9;-...'1) 2.-1 .1 1.9 J ! .2 ND 1.2 ND
:--vlang.rmcsc 50 364 :=;9::;.1 663 363 -UiO :=;21 (i]9 ., 630 -19-1 2-IS
Nickd 100 1-i.O .I I _ _-; J 1.7 ND 1.0.1 0.86 .I O.S ND 0.8 l\'D I 1 ND I 1 :-,..=n 1. I ;-..'D
Notes: [folded values indicate detected concentrations greater than re1ncd1;11inn goal:-;.
U,ND -not detected
J • detected, estimated result
UJ • not detected, estimated result
D • dilution sample
E -exceed calibration limit
B • found in blank
NA -not analyzed
Table E-1. GE Subsite -Performance Well Analytical Results. (continued)
Remediation
Parameter Goal
voe, (µg/L)
l .2-Di..:hlorocthanc
Benzene
Chloroform
i.:is-1.2-Dichlorocthcnc
Tctrnchlorocthcnt·
irans-l ,2-D1chloroe1hcnc
'J'richlorocthcnc
Vinyl chloridc
SVOCs (µg/L)
Ni1roher1Zt:ne
METALS TOTAL (µg/L)
Barium
Beryllium
Lead
Manganese
0,'ickel
Notes:
U,ND -not detected
J -detected, estimated result
UJ -not detected, estimated result
D -dilution sample
E -exceed calibration limit
B -found in blank
NA • not analyzed
70
70
2.8
10
2000
;
15
50
100
MW-3
Mar-03 Jun-03 Sep-OJ Mar-04 Scp-04 Mar-05
ND (2.0) ND (2.0} ND !2.0J ND {1.0J ND(2.UJ ND (I.OJ
ND(I.OJ NIJ(l.0J ND ( 1.0) ND(l.0J ND (I.OJ j\'[) ( 1.0)
ND (2.UJ Nil 12 OJ NI) {2.0) ND (2.0) NDCUJ) ND{l.0)
3.9 5.9 5.6 68 4.5 2.7
0.55 J NDC:Ul) 0. 55 J ND {2.0) NIJ(2.0) ND (I OJ
ND (2.0) ND(2.U) ND(2.U) Nll (2.U) ND (2.U) ND ( 10)
1.2 J I I J 1.3 J 10 J U.7 J ND (1.0)
Nll(IO) ND (I.OJ Nil (10) Nil (10) ND (I OJ ND(l.O)
i\'A ND {5.0) ND(5.UJ
I 8.8 J 18.1 J 21.4 J 2-J..8 J 24.3 B
0.26 ND U.26 ND 0.26 ND 0.3 NIJ 0.3 ND
2.9 ND 1.2 ND 1.2 ND 2.-1 ND 1.2 ND 1.2 ND
528 -t93 -t65 -t39 -tO-t 3711
l.l NIJ I.I ND LI ND 1. l ND ! ! NU I.U B
BolLkd valw:s indicate ddt'cted conct'ntrations greatL'f than remt'diat!on goals.
Sep-05 Sep-06 Sep-07 Scp-08
ND (I.OJ ND (0.5) ND (l.UJ I O l\'D
ND{I.UJ ND (U.5J ND (I.OJ 1.0 ND
NDIIO) N!J (0.5) Nil I 10) 1.0N'D
2.2 3.3 ND ( 1.0) l.O ND
NlJ(I.0J 0.56 J ND ( I.OJ 1.0 :-..·o
ND ( IU) ND (0 5J ND (I.OJ 1.0 ND
ND (I.OJ 0.9 J ND(I.0J 1.0 ND
ND { I.OJ ND(0.5) NIJ ( 10) 1.0 ND
3.3 B 2.8 B ND {15.0J 15.0 ND
303 301 600 390
I.! ND 0.8 NO ND (100.0) 100.U ND
Table E-1. GE Subsite -Performance Well Analytical Results. (continued)
Remediation MW-8
Parameter Goal Scp-00 Dcc-00 Mar-OJ .Jun-01 Sep-0 I Dcc-01 j\:lar-02 Jun-02 Scp-02 Dec-02
voe, (µg/Ll
l .2·1)ichlnrncthant· 20.11 ;-..'[) (20.0) ND(I0.0) ND (10.0) I. 7 .I ;-,..'[) (2_0) i".'IJ (2.0) ND (2.0) ND (-1-.0) ND (4.0)
Rcnzcnc ;,._,[) (:i.O) ~[) (10.0) ND (:i.0) ND (S.Cl} ND(l.O) 7'-'D (I.OJ ND ( I 0) ND ( 1.0) ND (2.0) ND (2.0)
Chlon11<m11 ;,...•[) (l(U)) ND (20.0) NIJ ( 10.0) ;,...'I) ( l 0.0) 1''D (?..O) Nil (2.0) i\![) (2.0) ND (2.0) ND (4.0) )',.'0 (4 0)
ci.s.-1 .2-Dichlnn1e1bcm· iO \ (,.2 (i_{, .1 7.(, .l 7.0 J 4A Y.7 7.0 44 4.6 6.1
Tctrachlorocthrnc 32S 275 20S 225 19S 134 11~ SS.i 130 141
trani.-1.2-Dichlnrocthcnc 70 ;--.!I) ( 10.0) ND (20.0) ND (10.0) ND(!O.O) (UC.I 0 57 .I 0.9.3 J 0.59 J t-,1) 14 0) ND (4.0)
Trichl(1rnt·1hcnc 2.S 13.0 10.2 .I 5.tJ .I fl.! ,I "' 2.8 4.3 2}) 3.3 .I 3.2 .I
Vinyl diloridc ND (:'i.OJ ND{I0.0) ND (5.0) ND (5.0) i'-'!J ( I .0) ND ( 1.0) i\'fJ ( !.O) ND ( 1.0) ND (2_0) ND C.O}
SVOC, (11g/L)
Nitrnhcnzcnc Ill ND{S.O) ND (5.0) ;--,•I) IS.fl) ND (5.5) ND/5.0) ND(S.0) NA ;--..',\ ND (5.1) NA
META LS TOT AL (µg/L)
Barium 2000 28.2 .I 26...t J 26. 7 J 22.0 .I 23.7 .1 17.6 .1 17 .2 .l 21.6 J 18.3 .I 17.8 .1
Beryllium 4 0.43 .1 06ND 0.93 ND 0.22 ND 0.22 ND 0.22 ND 0.22 ND 0.26 ND 0.26 ;,,.:I) 0.26 ND
LcaJ 15 l.2 ND 2.1 ND 1.7 ND 1.2 ND 1.-1 ND 2.4 :--.1D 3 .5 J 1.2 ND 4.5 ND 1.2 ND
l1:lang1111c~e 50 29.0 1 X.7 15.7 11.S.1 I fi.5 5 j .I 2.f1 J ... u J 5.0 .J 0.16 ND
Nici.el 100 5.5 J O.S ND 1.2 N!> 0.87 .1 ! .6 .I 0.8 ND 0 8 ;,,.;rl) 1. I i'-'!) I.IND I.IND
Notes: Bnldcd v;1luc:-indii.:atc dclcc!ed rnnee111r,11io11~ grcmcr than remediation goal.-:.
U,ND -not detected
J -detected, estimated result
UJ -not detected, estimated result
D -dilution sample
E -exceed calibration limit
B -found in blank
NA -not analyzed
Table E-1. GE Subsite -Performance Well Analytical Results. (continued)
Remediation
Parameter Goal
voes (µg/L)
1.2-Dii.:hloroeihane
Bt·nzene
Chloniform
i.:1s-1.2-Dichloroethene
Tetrai.:hloroethl'lle
trans-I .2-!Jichlorrn:thene
Trii.:hllHlK'lhem:
Vinyl chloride
SVOCs (µg/L)
Nitrohenzenc
METALS TOTAL (µg/L)
Banum
Beryllium
Lead
Manganese
Ni.:kcl
Notes:
U,ND -not detected
J • detected, estimated result
UJ -not detected, estimated result
D -dilution sample
E -exceed calibration limit
B -found in blank
NA • not analyzed
70
70
2.8
10
:2000
4
l:'i
50
100
MW-8
Mar-03 Jun-03 Sep-03 Mar-04 Sep-04 Mar-05
ND (10.0) NDl]O.o) Nil 12 0) ND(IO.O) 1.2 .I ND (5.0J
ND(5.0} ND (5.0J ND(l.o) ND (5.0) ND{l.U) ND (5.U)
ND(IOO) ND ( 10.0) ND (2.0) ND(!0.0) ND{2.0) ND(5.0)
6.2 J 16.7 15.6 l 2.8 19.I I 3.1
15-1 J(iJ 230 231 336 220
ND/10.ll) ND ( 10.0) 1.6 J Nil (10 Ill 1.5 J ]\'[) (5.0J
3,5 J i.O .J 7.0 5.7 .I (d! -1.9 .J
ND (5.0) ND (5.0} Nil ( 1.0) i\11) {5,U) NIJ(l.0) ND (5.0)
NA ND (5.0) ND(5.0J
! 8. l J 21.5 J 23.4 J 25. 7 J 24.9 B
0.26 ND 0.26 ND 0.26 7','[J 0.3 NIJ 0.3 ND
1.2 ND 1.2 ND 1.2 ND 5.9 1.2 ND 3.4 B
3.4 J 2.0 J 2.4 J 3.5 J 19.7 3.l B
! I ND I. I ND I.I ND I. I ND I.! ND I. I 7'-'D
Buie.led values indi.:atc dt'IL't.:lL'd WllCL'lllratiuns greater than remediation goals.
Sep-05 Scp-06 Sep-07 Sep-08
ND (2.0) ND (0.5) ND (I.O} I.ON[)
ND{2.U) NO(0.5) ND ( 1.0) !.ONO
ND (2.0) ND (0.5) ND(l.0) I.ONO
12.3 6.2 7 0 3.0
140 SJ.i 93.0 -10.11
ND (2.U} ND(0.5) ND (1.0) 1.0 ND
J.J 2.3 2.0 1.0 NO
NIJ (2.0J ND{0.5) ND {I.OJ 1.0 ND
1.2 ND 1.7 ND ND(l5.0J-15.0 ND
2.6 B ::UB ND (50.U) 50.0 ND
I. I ND 0.88 B ND(I00.0) 100.0 ND
Table E-2. Shepherd Farm Subsite • Performance Well Analytical Results.
Remediation
Parameter Goal
voe, (µg/L)
1.2.J)ichlnrnethanc
Rc11ze11c
Chlornfonn
cis-1.2-l)ichloniethene
Tctrachlnrocthcne
trans-1.2-Dichl\,roethcnc
Trichlornl'thene
Vinyl chloride
SVOCs (f1g/L)
;-s.'i1rohenzrne
METALS TOTAL (11g/L)
Barium
Beryllium
I .cad
7v1anganc~e
Nickel
Notes:
U,ND • not detected
J • detected. estimated result
UJ • not detected, estimated result
D • dilution sample
E • exceed calibration limit
B -found in blank
NA • not analyzed
70
70
2.8
10
2000
"
1)
50
100
MW-64
Scp-00 Dcc-00 Mar-Ill .Jun-01 Scp-0 I Dcc-01
ND (2 0) ND (2.0) ND (2.0) ND (2.0) ND (2.0) ND (2.{l)
ND (1.0) ND (1.0) ND(I0) N!l(l.O) ND (1.0) ND (1.0)
1 0 .1 ND(2.0J i\'D (VlJ ND{2.0} ND L}.0) ;'\'!) (2,0)
ND(2.0) ND (2.0) ND (2.0) ND (2.0J ND(2.0) ND(2.0J
3.6 2.S 0.83 J 1.9 .I 5.0 3.0
ND (2.0) ND CLO) ND (2.0) ND(2.0) ND(2.0) ND (2.0J
ND (2.0) ND(2.o) ND (2.0) 0.:D(2.0) ND (2.0) ;\[) (2.0)
ND(l.0) ND (1.0) ND(l.0) ND(I.()} ND (1.0) Nil (1.0)
ND (5.0) NIJ/:',.0) NDCU) ND (5.0) ND(:i.0) ND (5.0)
37.9 B 53.0 .I ·20.1 .1 22.0 .1 3 7 () J 34.5 .l
0.68 J 0.68 NI) 0.51 ND n.7:i NIJ 0.6 7 ;--.•]) 0.45 .l
1 .5 J 12.7 3.-1 ND 1.3 ND 1.2 ND 4. 7 ;,,.,•n
8.-1 J 27. 7 2.7 UJ 2.7 ND 3.-1 !Jl 7,0 .I
5.-1 ND 0.8 ND 1.2 .1 0.8 ND 0.8 ND 0 8 ND
Roldcd value~ indicutc dc!l'Ctcd cnnccntrntinns grc;ncr 1han Tl'mcdiminn g{1als
Mar-02 .Jun-02 Sep-02 Dcc-02
ND (2.0) ND (2.0) ND (::!.O) ND (2.0)
ND(l 0) i'\'[) ( 1.0) ND(l.0) ND (l.0)
ND (2 0) ND(2 0) ND/2.0) ND (2.0)
ND (2 OJ ND (2.0) :'\'D (2.0) ND(2.0J
o_q_1 1.2 .I 4.0 (\'[) (2.0)
ND (2.0) ND(2.0J ND(2.D) )\'!) (2.0)
ND (2.0) ND (2.0) ;,,,.:()(2.0) ND (2.0)
Nil I 10) ND(l.0) ND(!.G) ND (1.0)
NA NA ND(:"i.o) NA
3(,.X .I 2).6 .1 )5.5 .l 16.8 .I
0.22 ND 0.26 ND O 2(i ND 0.26 Nil
R 8 2.8 J 7.9 1.2 ND
16 3 J 4.7 J 16 7 6 . .J .1
1.5 .I I 1 ND I I ND 1.1 ND
Table E-2. Shepherd Farm Subsite -Performance Well Analytical Results. (continued)
Remediation
Parameter Goal
voes (µg/L)
1.2-Dkhluroctham'
Bcnzcru:
Chlorofon11
i.:is-1.2-Did1lorrn:thc11c
Tctrach!oroclht:nc
trans-I ,2-Dichlurocthcnc
Trichloructht:nc
Vinyl chloride
SVOCs (f1g/L)
~'itrobcnzl·ne
METALS TOTAL (µg/L)
Barium
Beryllium
Lead
i\1anganl'Sl'
Nii.:kd
Notes:
U,ND • not detected
J -detected, estimated result
UJ -not detected, estimated result
D • dilution sample
E -exceed calibration limit
B -found in blank
NA • not analyzed
70
70
2.8
10
2000
4
15
50
JOO
MW-64
Mar-03 .Jun-03 Sep-03 Mar-04 Sep-04 Mar-OS
NIJ(2.U) ND(2,0) ND(2.Q) Nil (2 0) ND (2 0) Nil (I.OJ
Nil I I.OJ ND (!.OJ Nil I I.OJ ND{l.U) ND ( I.OJ Nil (I.OJ
NlJ (2.0J ND (2.0J ND (2.0) ND{2.0) ND (2.0) ND ( 1.0)
ND(2.0) ND (2.0J ND (2.UJ Nil (2.0) ND (2 0) ND (I.OJ
ND (2 OJ ND (2.0J ND (2.0) ND !2.0) ND(2,0) ND (I.OJ
ND ('.!.OJ ]\'[) (2.0J ND(2.U) ND(2.0) NDC:!.UJ ND (I.OJ
ND{2.0) NDC:!.Di ND(LO) ?'-!Dt2.o) ND (LO) ND(l.o)
;-e1i ( I 0) ND (I.OJ ND(I.UJ ND(l.U) ND(l.U) ND (1.0)
NA ND(5.U) ND {5. IJ
15.2 J l 8.9 J 61.U .I 23.2 J 97.5 B
!.➔ .I U.26 ND U.26 ND 0.3 ND U.3 ND
-1.7 ND !.2 ND 15.7 -1.3 J 12 I I 1.7
3.4 .1 1.6 .J 3(i.S S.U .I 37.6 23.U
!.l ND I.I ND I 1.0 J I.I J 5.8 B 2.5 B
Bolded values indicate dell'i.:ted i.:om:rntrJtions grt·ater th:m n:medi:nilln guals.
Sep-OS Sep-06 Sep-07 Sep-08
ND (l.0) ND (0.5) ND (1.0} l.O ND
ND (10) ND 10.5) ND I 10) l.OND
ND (1.0) ND (0.5) ND(l.0) I.ONO
Nil ii.OJ ND (O.SJ ND (I.OJ 1.0 ND
0 74 J ND(0.5) 5.0 I 1.0
i\'D(l.UJ ND (0.5} ND ( I.OJ I.OND
ND(l.OJ ND (0.5) ND (I.OJ 1.0ND
NIJ (I.OJ ND{U.5J ND(l.U) I.UNI)
8.7 338 ND (15.UJ 15.0 ND
19.2 12.2 B ND 1500) 50.U ND
1.8 B 2.9 B ND ( 100.UJ !OU O ND
Table E-2. Shepherd Farm Subsite -Performance Well Analytical Results. (continued)
Remediation
Pam meter Goal
voes (µg/L)
1.2-Dichloroethane
Benzene
Chloroform
cis-1.2-l)ichlon'IC!hene
TctrnchlnrncthcrK
!ran~-1.2-J)ich!(1rnc1hcnc
Trichlnnlcthenc
Vinyl chloride
SVOCs (µg/L)
Nitrohcnzcne
METALS TOTAL (ftg/L)
IJarium
Beryllium
Lead
Manganese
Nkkel
Notes:
U.ND • not detected
J • detected, estimated result
UJ • not detected. estimated result
D • dilution sample
E • exceed calibration limit
B -found in blank
NA • not analyzed
70
70
2.S
10
:moo
➔
l S
so
100
MW-64A
Scp-00 Dcc-00 Mar-OJ .Jun-OJ Scp-0 J Dcc-0 J
ND(2.0) ND(2.0) ND (2.0) ;,...'I) (2.0) ND (2.0) ND(2.0J
Nil ( I.OJ ND (I.OJ NIJ (I OJ ND (1.0) ND(l.O) ND(l.O)
ND(2.0) ND (2.0) ND (2.0) 0.68 J 0.68 J ND (2.0)
ND (2.0) ND (.2.Q) ND {2.0) ND (2.0) ND{2.0) ND (2.0)
30.2 -16,7 -IJ.I -11.S -12.S -11.S
ND (2.0) ND (2.0) 0,'[) C!.0} j'\'i) (:!_0) ND {2.0} ND (2.0)
ND (2.0) ND (2.0) ND (2.Cl) i\:D(2.0) 0,'[) (2.0) ND (2.0)
ND ( 1.0) ND(l.0) ND (l.O) ND (I.OJ Nil ( I OJ Nll(l.01
ND(::;_(}) ND (5.0) ND (5.0) ND (S.0) ND (5.0) ND(5.0)
J4,0 J 33.6 .1 36.0 .l 31 7 .I 29.7 .1 30.2 .I
O.iCJ ND 0.86 U.l 0. i6 ND 0.83 ND 0.6 0,'[) 0.22 ND
l.2ND 1. 7 IJJ 1.5 ND 1.4 ND I .2 .I 4.4 ND
90.7 76.9 .I 92.4 .I i0.8 :'il.-1.J .50.-1
1.CJND 0.8 \J.1 0.97 .1 0.8 ND 0.8 ND 0.8 ND
(folded vah1cs indicate detected wncentraiions grea1cr than rcrncdiauon goals
i\lar-02 Jun-02 Scp-02 Dcc-02
;-..'[) (2.0) ;\'[) (2.0) 0-'D C:Ul) ND (2.0J
Nil (I.OJ ND ( I.OJ 7\'D (I.OJ ND (I.OJ
0.i7 .I 0.75 J 0.74 J 0.8 J
;-,;I) (2.0) ND (2.0} ND (2.0) ND(2.0)
-IJ.S 37.2 36.3 29.='
ND(2.0J ND (2.0J NDC:Ul} ND (2.0)
ND (2.0) ND('.U)) ND(2.0) ND (2.0)
ND (1.0) ND([.()} ND{l.0} Nil ( I.OJ
<
NA N:\ ND (S./l) NA
3 1.8 .1 32.1 .1 32.4 J 42.8 .I
0.22 ND 0.26 ND 0.26 ND 0.26 ND
1. 7 J 1.2 ND l.8ND 1.2 :--.:'D
.5-1.0 .I 93.-1 'J9 . .5 216
0.8 ND 1. 1 ND I.I ND I I ND
Table E-2. Shepherd Farm Subsite -Performance Well Analytical Results. (continued)
Remediation
Parameter Goal
voes (f,g/L)
1.2-J)ichlorrn:lhanc
Brnzene
Chlornforrn
i.:is-1,2-Dichlorm:lhcnc 70
·rl..'trai.:hlorocthcnc
trans-1.2-Dichlornethcnc 70
·rrichlorocthcnc 2.8
Vi11y! chloride
SVOCs (µg/L)
Nitrohenzt·ne 10
METALS TOTAL (11g/L)
Barium
Beryllium
Lead
i'vl.inganese
0,'id,t·I
Notes:
U,ND -not detected
J -detected, estimated result
UJ -not detected, estimated result
D -dilution sample
E -exceed calibration limit
B -found in blank
NA• not analyzed
2000
➔
l 5
50
100
MW-64A
Mar-03 Jun-03 Sep-03 Mar-04 Sep-04 Mar-05
ND(2.U) ND ('.2.U) ND {2.0J ND (2.0) ND{2.0J Nil I I.OJ
NO ( I.OJ N!J (1.0J ND(I.0J NIJ ( I.OJ ND (I.OJ ND ( I.OJ
0.65 J 0.63 J 0.51 J 0.66 J 0.65 J 0.5 i J
ND(2.UJ NIJ (2.UJ ND (2.0) NJ) (2.UJ ND (2.0) ND ( !.OJ
3-t9 33.7 JS.O -10.9 -11. i 36.2
ND (2.0) ND (2.UJ ND(2.0J ND(1.0J ND(2.UJ ND ( I.OJ
ND(2.0) ND (2.l)) ND (2.0) ND {2.UJ ND (2.0) ND ( 1.0)
ND (!.OJ NIJ (I.OJ ND (!.OJ Nil ( I.OJ ND { !.U) ND (l.U)
Nt\ ND(5.0) ND (5.0J
35. 7 J 36.8 J 3 7.4 J 35.6 J 33.4 B
0.26 ND 0.26 ND 0.26 ND 0.3 ND 0.3 ND
J _J ND l .2 ND !.2 ND I .2 J 1.2 NIJ l.2 ND
137 26-1 167 126 81.5 72.5
l.l ND l.l ND I.I ND I.! ND I.I ND !. l :'\'D
!folded values indicate de!ccted eorn.:entratinns greater than remedi;nion gu;ib.
Sep-05 Sep-06 Sep-07 Sep-OS
Nll(l.0J NO(O.SJ Nil I I.OJ 1.0 ND
Nll (I.OJ ND{0 SJ NIJ { I .O} 1.0 ND
0.56 J ND(0.5J ND ( I.OJ 1.0 ND
ND (I.OJ ND {0.5J NIJ ( l.0) l.O ND
-15.i 52.0 J(,,0 41.0
ND(I.OJ ND (0.5} ND ( I.OJ l.U ND
0.55 .I NIJ(0.5} Nil I I.OJ l.OND
ND{!.U) ND{U.5J Nil (I.OJ l.OND
1.2 ND l.7 ND ND ( I 5.0) 15.0 ND
91.2 JOI ND {50.0J 50.0 ND
10.7 B 0.8 ND Nll(I000J 100.0 ND
Table E-2. Shepherd Farm Subsite -Performance Well Analytical Results. (continued)
Rt•mediation
Parameter Goal
voes (11g/L)
1.2•Dichlornc1hane
Benzene
Chlnrofom1
cis-! .2-!Jichlnroc1henc
Te! me h loro~·thcnc
I rans-I . 2-1 )ich lorncthcnc
Tnchlonictll<.:llc
Vinyl chl(1ride
SVOCs (µg/L)
i\1itrohcnzene
METALS TOTAL (f1g/L)
Barium
lkryllium
Lead
;-,,fangant:st:
Nickel
Notes:
U,ND • not detected
J • detected, estimated result
UJ • not detected, estimated result
D -dilution sample
E -exceed calibration limit
B -found in blank
NA. not analyzed
70
70
2.S
10
2000
4
1 5
50
100
MW-66
Scp-00 Dcc-00 Mar-01 .Jun-01 Scp-01 l)cc-0 I
ND (2.0) ND(2.0) ND (2.0) ND (2.0) ND (2.0) 0>'[) (:Ul)
ND (1.0) ND (1.0) ND (1.0) NIJ(l.OJ ND ( 1.0) ND(l.O)
ND (~,O) ND (2.0) 0.81 .1 ND {2.0) ()_ 77 J i\.'[) (2.0)
1.6 .J ND(2.0) ND(2.0) ND (2.0) ND(2.o) NI> (2.0)
23.2 .J 45.S :SJ.4 :i4.5 65.i 5S.5
ND (2.0) 0-']) (2.0) ND(2.0) ND (2.0) ND (2.0) ND (2 0)
0_94 J ND/2.0) ND(2.0) ND/2.0) ND (2.0) ND (2.0)
~1)(1.0) ~[) (1.0) ND (1.0) ;,-..'[)(1.0) i\'D ( ! .0) ND ( 1.0)
ND (5.o) ND/5.0) ND (5.5) ND(5.0) ND (5.0) i\'[) (5.0)
52..' J 36. l .1 39.6 .I 26.0 J 40.0 .1 39.2 J
1.5 ND 0.87 U.I 0.8 ND 0.94 ND 0.81 ND 0.22 ND
4.2 .1 1.6 U.1 3 8 ND I .6 i\'D l.9 J (1.3 ND
223 5i.3 .I R 1.2 20.4 I19.fl J 9S.9
5.3 ND 1.8 .I 1.8 Nil 0.S i\'D 1.2 J 1 .9 J
R0lded values indicate detected cnrKcntra!ions greater than remediation g\1al~.
Mar-02 Jun-02 Scp-02 Dcc-02
NI> (2.0) ND CLO) ND (2.0) ND C.0)
ND(l,O) ND (I.OJ ND(l OJ ND(l.OJ
0.85 .1 0.6'.' ) 0.69 .I 0. 7 .1
ND (2.0) 0.52 J 0.55 .J ND (2.0)
(ii.I 6-Ul i 1.J i(i,(i
ND (2.0J 0,'[) (2.0) ND (2.0J ND (2.0J
ND (2.0) i\'[) (2.0) ND (2 0) ND (2.0)
ND!l.0) :\"D ( I .0) ND(l.OJ ~I) (1.0)
NA i\lA ND (5.0) NA
28.0 J 26.:i .I 30.8 .I 28.9 .I
0.22 ND 0.26 ND 0.26 ND 0.26 ;\;f)
2.5 .1 1.2 ND 2.5 ND 1.2 ND
1 (i.4 .J 25.9 45.0 38.8
0.8 ND I 1 ND I.I ND I.I ND
Table E-2. Shepherd Farm Subsite -Performance Well Analytical Results. (continued)
Remediation
Parameter Goal
voes (ftg/L)
1.2-Dichlornethane
Benzene
Chlorofon11
i.:is-1.2-Dichloroethene
Telrach!oroethcne
trnns-1 .2-!Jit.: hloructhene
·rrichlorol'thrnc
Vinyl chloride
SVOCs (µg/L)
Ni1rober1Z1.:nc
METALS TOTAL (f1g/L)
Barium
Beryllium
Lead
Mangam·se
Nickel
Notes:
U,ND -not detected
J -detected, estimated result
UJ -not detected, estimated result
D -dilution sample
E • exceed calibration limit
B -found in blank
NA -not analyzed
70
70
2.8
10
:woo
4
! 5
50
100
MW-66
Mar-03 Jun-03 Sep-OJ Mar-04 Sep-04 Mar-05
ND (2.0) ND (2.0) ND(2.0) ND(2.o) NIJ(2.0) ND ( 1.0)
Nil I I.OJ Nil I I.OJ ND(I.0) ND(I.OJ ND (I.OJ Nil ( I0J
0.(J(JJ U.59 J 0.(19 .I i\'D ('.UJJ ND (2.0) ND/ I 0)
U.89 J 0.79 J 0.97 J 0 8 I J 1.0 J 0. i J
80.2 83.0 76,6 80.-1 82.1 69.-1
ND(2.0J ND (2.ll} NUO.0l i\'D (2.ll) ND (2.0J ND (I.OJ
ND (2.U) ND (2.0) ND(2.0J ND(2.0) ND (2.U) ND(l.o)
ND ( I.OJ ND{l.0J ND(l.0) NIJ(l.0) ND (I.OJ ND ( 1.0)
NA ND (5.0) ND (5.0)
22.5 J 22.8 J 22.7 J 24.6 J 23.6 B
0.26 ND 0.26 ND 0.26 ND 0.3 ND 0.3 ND
1.4 ND 1.2 ND 1.2 NIJ !.3 J 1.2 ND 2.9 B
(,.6 .I 14. l J 5.9 J 4.5 J 15.9 8.5 B
I. I ND I.I ND I.IND I.I NO I.I ND I. I ;-,.!l)
Bolded values indicate detected O:\lJl1..·rntra1io11s grl·:1ter than remedi:11iu11 goals
Sep-05 Sep-06 Sep-07 Sep-08
Nil ( I.OJ ND(0.5) ND(l.0) 1.0 ;-..'[)
ND(l.0) ND {0.5) ND{I.OJ I.ONO
ND ( 1.0) ND (0,5) ND { 1.0) 1.0 ND
0.59 J ND (0.5) ND{I.UJ I .U ;,,.:!]
50.9 .fY.-1 -40.0 -U.O
ND ( !.OJ ND (U.SJ NIJ (I.OJ 1,0 ND
ND ( I.OJ ND (0.5) ND(l.U) l.U ND
NIJ(I.0) ND (0.5) Nll{I.0J I.ONO
44 ll 4.8 ll ND (IS.OJ ·15 0 ND
18.9 25.(, ND(50.0J 50.0 ND
I.I ND 0.8 ND ND ( 100.C)) 100.0 ND
Table E-2. Shepherd Farm Subsite -Performance Well Analytical Results. (continued)
Remediation
Parameter Goal
voes o,g/L)
l .2·1 )id1lnrnc1hnne
lk111.rnc
Chlnnlfori11
ci.,. 1 .2·1 )i ch lnrnct hcnc
·rc1 rac 11 lnnlctlKne
tran~-l .2-l)ichllm1cthrnc
Tri..:hl(mll'!hcnc
Vinyl chl(1riM
SVOCs (µg/L)
Nitrnhe111e11e
META LS TOT AL (µg/L)
Buriwn
lkrylliurn
Lead
ivlangam:se
Nid;cl
Notes:
U,ND • not detected
J -detected, estimated result
UJ • not detected, estimated result
D -dilution sample
E -exceed calibration limit
B -found in blank
NA • not analyzed
70
70
2.8
10
2000
"
l 5
)()
100
RWSF-1
Sep-00 Dec-00 M:ir-01 .Jun-01 Sep-01 Dcc-0 I
;,...;!) (2.0) ;,-..'[) (2.0) ND (2.0) 0,']) (2.0) ;-..•I) (2.0) ND (2.0J
;,...•[) ( I .0) Nil (1.01 ND /1.0) ND(I.O) ND ( 1.0) ;,..,•[) (I.OJ
ND (2.0J N!J (2.0) ND (2.0) ND (2.0) ND (2.0) NIJ (2.01
ND (2.0) ND (2.0) ND (2.0) ND (2.0J ND(20) NIJ (2.0J
34.0 SIA H.2 40.4 -t(d 52.6
ND (2.0) ND (2Jll ND (2.0) ND (2.0) ND (2 OJ NIJ (2.0)
ND !2.0) N!J (2.0) ND{2.0) ND{2.0) ND (2.0) ND (2.0J
ND (I.OJ ND ( 1.0) ND(l.O) ND (!.O) ;,...'[) (1.0) ND(l.0}
ND(5.Q) ;,-,JI) (5.0) ND (5.5) ND(55) ;\'I) (:i.0) j\,'1) (5.0)
161.0 J 19:; 0 .J 290 242.0 25➔ 0 J I 5:i .0 .l
0.3 ND 2.6 ! 1.1 2.2 ND 2J ND 1.1 ,I 1.2 .1
1.5 .I 5!1.6 .J 49.5 21A 24.3 · I 0.4 ND
65.6 42.6 .1 109.0 .I 10().0 90.1 .I i 1.S .I
13.7 .I 1.4 J 6.5 J 0.8 ND 3.5 J I .X J
Bolded values indicate detected cnnccntr.ninns gre.iter than rcrncdiati(lll g(1als.
i\l:H-02 .Jun-02 Sep-02 Dec-02
L'-'[) (2.0) ND(2.0) ;-..'[} (2.0) ND (2.0)
;'\'I) (l ,O) ND(l OJ ;,/[) ( 10) NIJ(l.0)
0 . .'.'2 J 0,'D (2.f)) (J..'.'2 .! NDC.fl)
i','[) ( 2 ()) ND(2.0) ND (2.fl) NIJ (2.fl)
'.'(d 56A 43.2 (d.6
NDC::.0) ND(VlJ ND(2.0J ND (2.0)
J\'D (2.0) ND (2 0) ND (2.0) Nil (2.0)
ND ( 1.0) ND ( 1.0) ND(l.0) ND (!.0)
NA j\,',\ ND (5 0) NA
l 5(i.O .! 1 ➔2 0 J IJ-l.O .l 6 l ..' .I
0.22 ND 0.26 ND 0.26 ND 0.26 ND
26.1 22.7 J.!U I 2 ND
'JS. I .J 105 77.6 0.16 NIJ
-UJ 1.1 ND !. 1 ND I 1 ND
Table E-2. Shepherd Farm Subsite -Performance Well Analytical Results. (continued)
Remediation
Parameter Goal
voe, (µgl½)
1,1-Dii.:hlornl'lhant·
l~rnzenc
Clilorol"orrn
ei~-1 .2-1 )icl1l(lnJClhe1ic
'J'ctrnch!orot·thene
trans-l .2-l)iehlon1cthcne
"l'rii.:h lorm·tht·ne
Vinyl dtloridc-
SVOCs (µg/L)
Nitrnbcnzenc-
META LS TOTAL (µg/L)
Bariu111
Beryllium
Lead
Manganesc-
Nkkc-1
Notes:
U,ND • not detected
J • detected, estimated result
UJ -not detected, estimated result
D • dilution sample
E -exceed calibration limit
B -found in blank
NA • not analyzed
70
70
2.S
10
2000
"
15
50
100
RWSF-1
Mar-03 .Jun-03 Scp-03 Mar-04 Sep-04 Mar-05
ND (2.0) ND{::!.O) ND{2.0) ND (2.0J 7\'D(2.0J ND (l.OJ
ND(l.OJ NU(I.UJ ND (I.OJ ND(l.o) ND(l.U) Nll(I.OJ
ND {2.UJ ND (2.0J NIJ !2.0J NIJ (2.0) ND (2 OJ ND(l.OJ
ND (2.0J ND (2.0J 3.5 Nil (2 OJ i\'D (2.0) Nil I I OJ
32.2 JS.I 37.7 44.3 36.8 51.(1
ND CLUJ ND(2.0J ND C~.U) ND (2.UJ ND(2.UJ ND(l.OJ
ND {2_0) ND/2.()) 0.9 ! J ND(2.0) ND(2.0) ND(l.U)
ND (I.OJ i\'D ( l .UJ Nil I LO) j\'IJ (\.0) 'iD (IUJ ND(l.U)
0,'1\ ND (5.0J ND (5.U)
28.3 J 47.6 .I I 52.0 .I 141.0 .I 132.U !.3
U.26 ND 0.26 ND 0.26 ND 0.3 ND 0.3 ND
30.5 106 7.1) 14.U 13.8 14.5
12.8 .1 126 6-L5 55.7 106 152
JI I 100.0 1.8 .I 40.8 .I I 0. 7 ll 21.4 B
Holded values indic-at_. dctc_.tt·d c-tJnccntrntions greater 1han n:111cdiatitJn go:.ils.
Sep-05 Sep-06 Sep-07 Sep-08
Nil (I.OJ NIJ (U.5} ND ( I.OJ 1.0 N!J
ND ( 1.0) ND (0.5} ND (I.OJ l.0 ND
Nil I I OJ ND (0.5) Nll I 10) 1.0 Nil
0.5-1 J ;,.,•u {0.5 J NIJ{l.UJ l.UND
69.IJ 43.2 41.0 60.ll
ND(l.OJ ND (U.5J ND I IOJ 1.0 ND
ND ( I.OJ 0.54 J ND(l.0J !.0ND
ND ( I.OJ NO (0.5) ND I IUJ 1.0 ND
17.0 -11.2 )\'1)(15.0) l 5.0 ND
'Ji.3 22.4 ND (50.0) 50.0 ND
8.5 B 177 ND(I00.0) 100.0 ND
Table E-3. Residential Well Analytical Results.
Remediation
Parameter
voes (µg/L)
l .2 -1 )ich lnrncthnnc
lklll'.l'IJC
Chlnrol{irn1
ci~-1.2-Dichlorocthcnc
·1·c1 rach lnrnc1hc11c
Iran~-I .2-I >ich lnroe\hcnc
Trichlnrocthcnc
Vinyl chlPridc
SVOCs (µg/L)
Nitrnhcnzcne
METALS TOTAL (µg/L)
Barium
Beryllium
Lead
,\ langanese
Nickel
Notes:
U,ND • not detected
J • detected, estimated result
UJ • not detected, estimated result
D -dilution sample
E • exceed calibration limit
B •found in blank
NA -not analyzed
Goal
70
70
2.8
10
::woo
4
I'
50
100
WW-17
Sep-00 Scp-01 Scp-02 Sep-OJ Sep-0~
ND (2 0) Nil (2.0) ;'\I) (2,0) i',![) (2 0) 0,'[) (2.0)
ND (I .fl) ND (1.0) ND (1.0) ND (I.OJ j\'[) ( 1.0)
ND (2.0) NDC~.D) ;,,.•[) (2.0) ND c~m ND (2.0l
ND (2.0) NDC-°l 0,'[) (2.()) ND (2.0) ;,,.11) (2.0)
ND (2.0) ND (2.0) :'\'[) (2 OJ ND (2.0) NI) (2.0)
ND (1.0) ND(2.()) 0,'[J (2.0) ND (.2.0) ND/2.0)
ND (2.0) NDC.OJ ND (2.0) ND (2.0) ;\'])(2,0)
ND(l.O) Nil ( I.OJ ;\'[} (1.0) ND (1.0l ;--,.'l)(!.0)
J\,'D (S.O) ND (S.OJ ND(S.0) ND(.'i.0) ;,...'I) (5.0)
SX.9 J 66.6.1 65.7 .l 67,9 J 77.0 B
0.22 ND 0.22 ND 0.26 ND 0.26 ND 0.3 ND
1.2 ND 1.6 ND 1.6ND 1.2 ;\;[) 1.2 ND
39.4 i6.fl 6S.2 S9.i 113
11. 7 J 0.8 ND I IND l.lND 1.1 ND
!folded \"alucs indicalc design conccn1ra1ions greater than rcmcdia1io11 goal,
WW-82 sampled in Scp1emhcr 2007. hut ml! analyzed in fo\"or ofW\V-R2B
Sep-05 Sep-06 Scp-0i Sep-08
;--..'I) ( l 0)
ND(l.0)
Nll(l.O)
0-'D (1.0)
1..:-
0-'D(I.O)
:--.'[) ( I .0)
ND (1.01
2. l B
93.1)
I I ND
Table E-3. Residential Well Analytical Results. (continued)
Remediation
Parameter
voes (µg/L)
l .2-DichlornclhunL'
lknzcne
Chloro!{irm
Cis-1.2-Dii.:hlorocthcnc
·rcLrachlorocthc11l'
Trans-I _2-Dichlorncthcnc
Trichlorm:thL'nc
Vinyl di!oridc
SVOCs (µg/L)
Nitrobenzene
METALS TOTAL (µg/L)
Barium
Beryllium
Lead
ivlanganese
Nickel
Notes:
U,ND -not detected
J -detected, estimated result
UJ • not detected, estimated result
D -dilution sample
E -exceed calibration limit
B -found in blank
NA -not analyzed
Goal
70
70
2.8
10
2000
4
15
50
IOU
WW-28
Sep-OU Sep-01 Sep-02 Sep-03 Sep-04
ND (2.0) ND (2.0J N!J (2.0J ND (2.UJ ND(2.0J
ND ( I.OJ ND ( !.OJ ND ( I.U) ND(l.UJ ND ( 1.0)
ND C2.0) ND(2.0J ND (2.U) i\!D (2.U) ND(2.0)
ND(2.U} NU (2 OJ ND (2.UJ Nll (2.0J ND(2.0J
ND (2.0) NDCUJJ ND (2.UJ ND (2.0J ND(2.0)
ND (2.0J ND CLO} ND (2.U) ND (2.UJ ND (2.0J
ND (2.0) ND(2.0J ND(2.0) ND (2.0J ND (2_0)
ND(l.0) ND (1.0) Nl>{!.O) NIJ ( !.OJ ND (1.0)
ND(5.0) ND(5.0J ND (5.U) ND (5.U) ND(5.U)
46A .I 58. 5 J 60.8 J 43.8 .I 56. l B
0.22 NIJ 0.22 i\'D 0.26 ND U.26 ND 0.3 ND
1.2 ND 9.3 10.1 ND 11.0 6.0
13.5 21.6 21.7 26.7 25.5
8.4 .I U.92 J l.J ND I ! ND 1.! ND
Bolded values indil:ate design concentrations greaier than fl'lllediation goals.
WW-82 sampkd in Septemlxr 2007, hut rwt analyzed in fo\'or ofWW-828.
Sep-US Sep-06 Sep-07 Sep-US
NlJ {I.OJ ND (0.5) NIJ (I.OJ !.U ND
NlJ (I.OJ ND(0.5} ND ( I.OJ 1.0 ND
ND I 1.UJ ND(0_5J ND ( I.OJ 1.0NIJ
ND ( !.U) ND (0.5J NIJ I 1.UJ I.U ND
ND (I.OJ ND (U.5) NIJ I I.OJ l.UND
ND ( I.OJ ND (0.5) ND ( I.OJ 1.0 ND
ND ( I.OJ ND (U.5) ND(I.UJ 1.0 ND
ND (l.U) ND {U.5) ND (l.U) 1.0 ND
8.5 8.6 ND (15.0) 15.0 ND
23.2 25.3 ND (50.0) 50.U ND
l.l ND 0.8 ND NIJ (IUO 0) !UO.O ND
Table E-3. Residential Well Analytical Results. (continued)
Remediation
Parameter Goal
voes {ftg/L)
1.2·1 )id1lorncthanc
]kn/cm:
Chl11rnl\)r111
i.:is-1.2-1 )ich\()roc1hcnc 70
Tctrachl\irrn.:thenc
lrans-1.2-Dichlorocthcnc 70
Trii.:hl(irnclhcnc 2.8
Vinyl ,.;hlnnde
SVOCs {ftg/L)
Nitrnhenzenc 10
METALS TOTAL (ftg/L)
Barium
lkryllium
Lead
:--.1ang:111cse
;-..'ickcl
Notes:
U,NO -not detected
J -detected, estimated result
UJ • not detected, estimated result
0 -dilution sample
E -exceed calibration limit
B -found in blank
NA • not analyzed
2000
➔
1 5
50
100
WW-33
Scp-1111 Sep-01 Sep-02 Scp-03 Sep-04
i\'[) (2.0) 0-'D (2.0) ND (2.0) ND (2.0J ND(2.0)
;,...11) ( 1 .0) ND(l OJ ND ( 1.0) ND (I.OJ ND(Ul)
i\'f) 12_()) ND (2 OJ NIJ 12.0l .\'!) (2_0) NI) ( 2./l)
]'\'[) (2.0) ND (2.0) N!J (2.0) ND (2.0) NI) (2.0)
i\'[) (2:.0) :--.:o (2.0) N!l (2.0) ND(2.0) ND (2.0)
;--.'[) (2.0) ND (2_0) ND (2.f)J ND(2.0) ND (2.0)
ND (2.0) ND (2 0) ND(2,0) ND(2.0) ND (2.0)
j\'[)(1.0) ND (1.0) ND(I.0) ND (1.0) Nll(I 0)
0,'[)(.'i.0) ND (.'i.O) ND (.'i.O) NDL'i.0) :--,•[) ( .'i.0)
8.2 .l 9. l J 10, 7 .1 22 7 .l 9_..! B
0 44 .1 0.71 ND 0.2(1 ND 0.26 ND OJ N!J
1.2 ND 1.2 ND 1.2 ND 3.2 0,'[) 1.2 ND
1.2 J 0.57 lJJ 0.16ND 2.0 .I 20.0
2.1 J 0.8 ND 1.1 0,'[) 1.4 J 1.1 ND
Rolded v;ilues indicate de.'-ign cor1...:cntra1inm greater than remediation g(1al.'-.
WW-82 sampled in Scptcmhcr 2007. hut nnt .inalyzcd in fovnr of \VW-R2B.
Scp-05 Scp-116 Scp-07 Scp-08
,01) (10) 0,'[)(0 . .'i) ND(l.O) 1.0 ND
;\.'[) (1.0) ;,,..'[) (O . .'i) ND (1.0) 1.0 ND
ND (1 OJ i\'[) (O . .'i) ND (1.0) 1.0 Nil
ND(l 0) 0,'[) (O . .'i} ND (1.0) I.ON[)
;-..'[) ( l OJ i\'[) (0.5} i\'D ( I .0) 1 .0 ;-..'[)
ND (1 0) ND (O . .'i) ND(I 0) 1 .0 ;--..'[)
;,,..'[) (1.0) ND (0.5) ND (1.0) 1.0 Nil
0,'[) (1.0) ND (0 . .'i) ND ( 1.0) 1.0 Nil
! 1.2 3.4 B ND (15.0) 15.0 NIJ
0. 74 l3 1.5 ND ;,...'D (50.0) 50.0 ;,...rl)
I.I ;,...rl) 0.8 ND Nll(IOOO) 100.0 ND
Table E-3. Residential Well Analytical Results. (continued)
Remediation
Parameter
voe, (1,giL)
1.2-Didtlorm.:thane
Benzene
Chloroform
i.: is-I .2-!Jich!oroetht·ni:
·1·c1rui.:hlorotth.:nc
trnns-l .2-1Jichlorodhc1w
Trii.:hlurocthcnc
Vinyl d1loride
SVOCs (µg/L)
Nitrobcnzene
META LS TOTAL (ftg/L)
Barium
Beryllium
Lead
tv!anganese
Nkkt:l
Notes:
U,ND -not detected
J • detected, estimated result
UJ -not detected, estimated result
D -dilution sample
E -exceed calibration limit
B -found in blank
NA -not analyzed
Goal
70
70
2.8
10
2000
4
15
50
JOO
WW-34
Scp-00 Sep-01 Scp-02 Sep-03 Scp-04
ND(2.0) 0,'D (2.0J Nil (2.0J ND(.2.UJ ND(2.o)
ND ( 1.0) ND{l.0) Nil { I.OJ ND (l.O) ND ( I.OJ
ND/2.!l) ND(2.D) ND (2.0J NIJ(2.0J ND (2.0l
ND (2.UJ ND (2.0J NJ> (2.0J ND(2.UJ ND {2.UJ
ND (2.0) ND (2.0J ND (2.UJ ND(2.0J ND(2.0)
ND (2.0) ND (2.0J ND (2.0) ND(2.0J ND(2.U,
ND{2.0) ND (2.0J ND(2.0, ND (2.0J ND(2.0J
ND ( l.0) ND(I.0) NO(l.UJ ND (1.0) Nil I 1.0)
Nil 15.0) ND (5.0) Nil (5.1) ND {5.0} Nil 15.1)
16.6 J 14 7 J 15.9 J 10 6 J 16.6 B
0.7 ND 0.84 ND 0.26 ND 0.26 NO OJ ND
l.2 ND 1.8 .I 1.9 ND 4.6 .I 1.2 ND
9.8 .I 4.6 .I 6. 5 J 1.2 J I0.6 B
4.l ND 0.8 ND I. I ND I.I ND l.l ND
Bolded \'alui:s indicute design cuni.:cntrntlons greater than ri:mediation go:ils.
WW-82 Salllpled in September 2007. bl!I 1101 ana!yJ:ed in favor ofWW-828
Sep-05 Scp-06 Sep-07 Scp-08
ND(l.OJ ND (0.5J ND(l.OJ !.OND
ND ( I.OJ ND(0.5J ND (I.OJ 1.0 ND
:--!D ( I.OJ ND {U.5J ND{I.U) I.0ND
ND (I.OJ ND (0.5J ND (I.OJ 1.0 ND
ND (I.OJ ND (0.5) Nil (I.OJ 1.0 ND
ND (I.OJ ND (0.5} ND (I.OJ I.ON[)
ND(l.OJ ND (0.5J ND (I.OJ I.OND
ND(l.0) ND(0.5) ND (1.0) t.0ND
2.5 B -1.2 H ND (15.0) l 5.0 ND
5.2 13 3.1 B ND (50.0) 50.0 ND
I I ND 0.8 ND ND (100.0} 100.0 ND
Table E-3. Residential Well Analytical Results. (continued)
Remediation
Parameter Goal
voe, c1,g!L)
! .2-1 )ichlmrn:thane
[k111.c111.:
Chloroform
.:is-l .2-1 )ich\<1roe1hcnc 70
Tctr.ichl(mH.:lhene
tran~-1.2-Dichloroethcne 70
Trichltmictbt·nc 2.8
Vinyl chloride
SVOC, (11g/L)
Nitrnhcn/ene 10
METALS TOTAL (µg/L)
Barium
lkryllium
Ll·ad
:--.!anganc~e
:-..1ii:kd
Notes:
U,ND • not detected
J • detected, estimated result
UJ • not detected, estimated result
D • dilution sample
E • exceed calibration limit
B -found in blank
NA -not analyzed
2000
,
1 5
50
100
WW-5
Scp-00 Sep-Cll Sep-02 Scp-03 Sep-0~
ND (2.0) ND(2.{J) ND (2.0) ND (2.0J ND(Hl)
ND(I.O) ND(I.O) N!J(l.0} ND (I.OJ ND(l.0)
ND (2.0) ND(2.0) ND (2.0) 0.53 .I ND(2.0)
ND(2.0} ND (2.0) ND (2.0) ND (2.0) ND (2.0)
ND (2.0) 0-'J) (2.0) ND (2_0J 0,'[) ( 2.0) ND (2.0i
ND(2.0) ND(2.Q) ND(2.0) ND (2.0) ND CLO)
ND (2.0) :--mc.oi ND (2.()) ND C~.o) ND (2_0)
ND (1.0) :-..'D (1.0) ND(l.O) ND ( 1.0) ND(!.O)
ND (5 0) ND (5.0) ND (5.0l ND (5.0) ND(S.OJ
94. i J 10\.()J 101.0 J ! llJ.O .I 219
0.22 ND 0.22 ND 0.26 ND 0.26 ND 0.3 ND
3.2 .I 4.2 J 3.0 ND 2.9 ND 3_..I B
-IS.0 50A .I 13, 5N.7 Ill
l 1.2 .1 O.R ;-..•D I ! ND l. I :,-.1[) 1.1 ND
Bnlded values indicate dc.,ign c011ee11!rations greater than remediation goals
W\V-82 .-;a111pled m Scptemhcr 200i. hut not a11:1lyzcd in favor of \VW-R2B.
Sep-OS Scp-06 Scp-07 Scp-08
;'\'[) (1.0) ND (0.5) ND(l.0) 1.0 ND
ND (I.OJ ND (0 5) ND (I.OJ I.OND
;--..'[) ( I .Ol 0.52 .I NIJ(l.0) 1.0 ND
;,...'[) ( 1.0) ND(0.5) ND(l.O} 1.0 ND
:'\'D ( I _fl) ,\I) (0.:i) ND(l.0) 1.0 ND
"[)(JO) ND (0.:i) ,i[J(\0) I.ONO
,i[J(\0) ND(O.:i) ND (1.0) !.OND
ND (1.01 ND (0.5) ND ( !.0) !.OND
I 0.7 10.i ;-..•[) (15.0) 15.0ND
lfl9 (,(,A 120 70.11
I I ND 0.8 ND ND (100.0) I 00.0 ND
Table E-3. Residential Well Analytical Results. (continued)
Remediation
Parameter
voes (11g/L)
1,2-Didilorocth:me
Benzene
Chloroform
cis-1.2-Dichlowetlu.·nc
Tt:trach!onll.'lhcnL'
trans-1,2-l)iehlonll·thL'lle
Trid1lorni.:1hcne
Vinyl ...:llloridc
SVOCs (11g/L)
Nitrnhcnzcnc
METALS TOTAL (µg/L)
Barium
Beryllium
Lct1d
l\l:mgrnll'SC
Ni...:kcl
Notes:
U,ND -not detected
J -detected, estimated result
UJ • not detected, estimated result
D . dilution sample
E -exceed calibration limit
B -found in blank
NA• not analyzed
Goal
70
70
2.8
10
2000
4
15
'iO
100
WW-73
Scp-00 Sep-0 I Sep-02 Scp-03 Sep-04
ND (2.0J ND(2.0) ND(2.0J ND(2.0J ND (2.0J
ND ( 1.0) ND (I.OJ NIJ(l.UJ ND(I.OJ ND{l.0)
NIJ(2.0J NIJ (2.0J ND (2.0J ND (2.U) NIJ(2.0)
ND (2.0J ND (2.0J ND (2.0J ND (2.0) ND (2.0J
ND(2.0) ND {2.0J ND(2.UJ ND{2.0J ND(2.0J
ND (2.0) ND (2.0J ND(2.U) ND (2.0J ND(2.0J
ND (2.0J ND (2.0J ]\'[J (2.0) ND (2.0J ND{2.0)
ND (1.0) ND (I.OJ ND (I.OJ ND (I.OJ Nil I 1.0)
ND (5.U) ND{5.0J ND {5.UJ ND (5.0J ND (5.2J
65.9 J 684 J 45.5 J 39.4 J 41.0ll
I .I ND 0.86 i\'D 0.26 ND 0.26 ND 0.3 ND
5.5 3.9 J 5.9 ND 3.4 ND 21.3
l 8,3 !-U.J I l .4 J 0.16ND 31.3
5.3 N!J 0.8 ND I.I ND !. I ND l.l ND
Boldcd values indkate design o.:oni:entratiuns grc.itcr than rt:llll'diatiun goals.
W\V-82 sampled in September 2007. but not analyzed in !:l\"Or ufWW-82B
Sep-05 Sep-06 Scp-07 Scp-08
ND ( 1.0) ND (0.5) ND(l.OJ 1.0 ND
ND ( I.OJ ND (0.5) ND(l.U) I.ONO
ND(l.0J ND (0.5) ND(l.0J 1.0 0-'D
ND(l.O) ND (0.5) ND (I.OJ I.ONO
ND(l.0) ND (0.5J ND(I.U) l.OND
ND(l.0) ND (0.5J ND(I.0) LUND
Nll I 1.0) ND (0.5) ND ( 1.0) l.O ND
Nil (1.0) ND (0.5J N!J (I.OJ l.O ND
UH 7.2 ND ( 15.0) 15.0 ND
12.'i B 7.1 ll ND (50.U) 50 0 ND
4,2 B o.x ND ND (100.0) 100.0 ND
Table E-3. Residential Well Analytical Results. (continued)
Remediation
Parameter Goal
voes (ftg/L)
1.2-Dii.:hlorncthnnc
fknzcnc
Chloroform
cis-1 .2 -1 )ich l11rm·1hc11c 70
Tctrach!oroctlwnc
tran.,-1.2-l)ichloroelhrnc 70
Trkhlon1c1hcrn: 2.R
Vinyl chlorid~·
SVOCs (ftg/L)
Nitrohcnzcnc 10
METALS TOTAL (ftg/L)
Barilllll
Beryllium
Lead
i\lnngancsc
Nickel
Notes:
U,ND • not detected
J -detected, estimated result
UJ -not detected, estimated result
D -dilution sample
E -exceed calibration limit
B -found in blank
NA -not analyzed
2000
➔
l:i
50
100
WW-82
Sep-00 Scp-0 I Sep-02 Scp-03 Scp-04
ND (2.0) ND (2.0) ND('.~.G) 0,'[) (2.0) ND (2.0)
;/[) (1.0) ND (1.0) ND (1.0) ND(l.0) ND(I.Q)
;\l) <:!.0) NDC.0) NDC.o) ND (2.0) ND (2.0)
0,'I) (2.0) ND (2.0) ND (2.0) ND (2.0) NDC.o)
:--.'D (2.0) ND (2.0) ND (2.0) ND(2.0J ND ( 2.0)
;/[) (2 0) 0-'D (2.0) 0-11) (2.0) ;\'[J (2.0) ND {2.0)
ND(2.o) 0,'D (2.0) ;-,..•!) (2.0) ND{2.0J ND(2.0J
;/fl ii.OJ ;,..•o (I.OJ ND {1.0) ND ( I.OJ ND {1.0)
ND(:i.0) ;-.,;[) (:i .:i) ;--,•o (:i.OJ ND{:i.0) ;,..:[) (:i. 1)
259 371 61.S 367 30:i
0.71 B l.:i ND 0.31 J 0.26 ND OJ ND
8.7 2.2 .I .l.6 ;\.'[) 7.1 1.2 ND
2:-1 :S66.0 .I 6:-6 S12 1170
12.0 B 2.-+ .I 3.0 J 7.6 J 4.9 B
Bnldcd values mdicatc design concentrations greater than rc1m:diatio11 g(1als.
WW-82 salllpkd in Scptcmhcr 2007 hu1 not annlyzcd in fo\'llf nfWW-82B
Scp-05 Scp-06 Scp-07 Sep-OS
;/[) ( 1.0) ND (0.:i) 1.0 ND
;/[) ( 1.0) ND (0.:i) 1.0 ND
ND (!.0) ND (0.S) 1.0 ND
ND ( 1.0) ND (O.S) 1.0 :-,.JI)
;-,.!I) ( 1.0) :-,.'!) (0.:i) 1.0 ;\.'!)
ND ( 1.0) ND (0.:i) 1.0 ND
:-,..•j) (1.0) ;\.'I) (Oj) 1.0 ND
ND (1.0) ND (0..'i) I.OND
8 8 lJ.2 24.0
1090 1200 1200
7.:i B :i.(i IJ 100.0 ND
Table E-3. Residential Well Analytical Results. (continued)
Parameter
Remediation
Goal
voes (µg/L)
1.2-Dii.:hlorocthanc
Benzene
Chloroform
i.:is-1.2-Di..:blorm:thrm:
Tetrachloroetht:nL·
trans-1.2-Dichlorol'thcnc
Trii.:hlnrocthenc
Vinyl Chloride
METALS TOTAL (µg/L)
I\,Janganesc
-Notes:
U,ND -not detected
J -detected, estimated result
UJ -not detected, estimated result
D -dilution sample
E • exceed calibration limit
B -found in blank
NA -not analyzed
70
70
2.8
l 5
50
IOU
Sep-00 Sep-0 I Sep-02
WW-828
Sep-03 Sep-04
Boldcd va!m·s indklltL' tksign crnH.:c111rations grcalr.:r than rl.'mcdiation goals
\V\V-82 sampled in SqJll.'lllhL·r 2007. hut 1101 ana!yzt:d in fovur ofWW-82B.
Sep-05 Sep-06 Sep-07 Scp-08
ND(l.UJ l.0 NIJ
ND(l.OJ 1.0 ND
NIJ (I.OJ 1.0 ND
ND (I.OJ 1.0 ND
ND(l.OJ 1.0 NIJ
ND ( I.OJ I.OND
ND ( 1.0) 1.0 ND
ND (I.OJ I.ONO
JIU 160
ND (50.0} 50.0 ND
ND ( IOU.OJ I 00.0 ND
ATTACHMENT B
Summary of GRS Influent/Effluent Groundwater
Results Since GRS Start-Up
Remediation Target Compounds Rcmcdintion Goal (ug/L)
Volatile Organic Compoumls
Benzene I
Chloroform I
1,2 Dichloroethanc I
cis-1,2 Dichloroethene 70
trans-1.2 Dichlorocthene 70
Tetrachloroethene I
Trichloroethene 2,8
Vinyl Chloride I
5emi-Vohttile Orgauic Compoumls
N itrobenzcne 10
Hetab, 1
Barium 2000
Beryllium 4
Lead 15
;-.-1a11ganese 50
7\1ickcl 100
ug'L -nncrogram_; p..:r !u..:r
I Efllu..:nt ,a1npk colk,.:t"'d atier air,;mpp..:1 fo, \'OC, .rnd S\'OC and ati<!r m<!tab
p«:!r..:atm..:111 m th..: GE Planr for 111,:tal,
2 Prwr tv .--\u~rnst 200b. metals eflluclH .,ampk., "~''-' ,.;plkded atfrr u;e as pmces,
,1 a!er iu !he GE Plant and alter metal; pre!reaunent_ tli.:idmc. GE metal, diluent
..:on..:entration; dci 110! d1re~tly ..:on c.,p,md to GRS 111ewls 11itlucm eo1Ken1rat1on.,
Smee ,\.,~u~t 200(i_ 1nernl,; pretreamient ,Jf 1he d!luc·nt ha., no! been ..:onduckd
• Sampk, c,ilkctcd OH g,~8,06 due tu mdJl;. eflluerH ,;ampling lucaTion bcmg una,ai!~hk
:S:.-\-:S:u1 ,rn,ily/cd: l"ll!hli1lls'lll remtn·in,.' from moniloring prog,am
Li.:-..:U 1mi1catc.< non-dek..:t;,hk Incl,;
n,e numbs,r indicated in parcnthcsi, i., the ,eporting li11ut
B-L\11ht,t11e111 detcded in blank result c,aim,ucd
GA090356/ATT B_ hist Ci\\' 1NF-EJT_2009update.xls,
: ,:5' ''°' 11/7/2000 ~::;,~;,;;:;
Influent Effluent 1
luo/L\ luo/L\
0,85 J ND (I)
1.3 J ND {1)
43 ND (2)
4L7 ND \2\
LI J ND(2)
427 ND (2)
9.7 ND(2)
ND (I) ND(\)
ND (5) ND (5)
6U J 1.6 J
,22 U 22 U
2.2 U uu
30.4 IAU
,80 U ,80 U
ATTACHMENT B
Summary ofGrnundwater Influent and Effluent Results Since GRS Start-up
GE Lighting Systems Annual Pcrfor-mance Monitoring
East Flat Rock, North Carolina
;~~.£3/15/2001~\J ), :;::v;\'.)\6/6/20011:;,~:,: ;:,;:_,~:_15;,~i.9/5/200 t -c;:;~_: -~"'4 ,:;,;::;::,10/18/2001:~,,;:
Influent Effluent Influent Effluent Influent Effluent Influent Effluent
(u2/L\ /ue/L\ (m!"/L) (u!!/L) (u2/L\ (uo/L) (u~IL\ luo/L\
ND (5) ND(\\ 1.4 ND(\\ 1.4 ND(ll ND (5) ND(I)
3,1 ND (2) l.6J ND (2) 4.4 ND(2) ND ( 10) ND (2)
7.9 ND (2) 6.2 ND\21 14.3 ND(2) ND\10) ND (2)
45 ND\2) 61.1 ND (2) 95.7 ND(2) 29.2 ND (2)
ND (10) ND (2) 1.41 ND (2) 1.6 ND (2) ND (10) ND (2)
272 ND (2) 292 ND (2) 559 ND (2) 177 ND (2)
25.3 ND (2) 23.8 ND (2) 38.7 ND (2) 19.4 ND (2)
ND (5,0) ND(\) 1.4 ND(\) 3.6 ND (II ND \5) ND(\)
ND (5,5) ND (5) ND (5,5) ND (5) 2,8 ND (5) ND (5) ND (5)
95, \J 4.48 64,88 0,948 206 I LI J 90A J 157 J
0,68U 0,37U 0,22U 0,22U LIU 0,22 U 037 U 0,'.,6 U
3,9U L6U 1.68 uu 9,6 1,2 U 1.9 J 7,0
857 38.8 15-1 2,W 1230 J 105 J 1090 1420
123J L6U 3.0B O,SOU 32.? J 3.0 J \UJ 38.3 J
I or 4
~~~:l 2/H/200 f: "."'":t71 :,i,:"'3/1312002,:~,c:, ;:: T; "6/1112002' :,,:::'' :;t: :'F;::9/2s12002 ;, ' :;;,,
Influent Effluent 1 Influent Effluent Influent Effluent Influent Effluent
luo/L\ luo/L\ luo/L\ luo/Ll luo/L\ luo/L\ luu/1,\ /uo/U
ND (5.0) ND (I I ND (5,01 ND ( 1.01 ND (5.0) ND(l,0) ND (5,01 ND ( I.OJ
ND (10) ND (2) 2,9 .I ND (2 0) ND(IO'°l ND \2,0) ND (\0,0) ND (2,01
ND(IO) ND (2) 7,7 .I ND (2,01 6,2 J ND (2,0) ND I 10,0) ND (2,0)
33,7 ND (21 39.9 ND(2'°l 35.7 ND(2'°] ns ND (2,0)
ND (10) ND\21 ND (10.0) ND(LOI ND ( 10,0i ND {2.0) ND\10'°1 ND (201
208 ND (2) 308 ND (2,0) 267 ND {2.0) 223 ND \2,0)
18.6 ND(2) 19,7 ND (2,0) 21.5 ND(2'°1 20.7 ND (2,0)
ND (5,01 ND (11 ND (5,01 ND\1.0) ND (5,0) ND ( 1.0) ND (5.0) ND (1.01
ND (5) ND(51 NA NA NA NA ND (5,0) 1.2 J
71.4 J SA J 132 J 3.5 J 84 J .0.49 U 84,9 J 0.49 U
0,22 U 0,22 U 0,62 J 0.22 U 0.26 U 0,26 U 0,26 U 0,26 U
3.8 U 25.9 2.5 J 1.6 J 2,8 J L2 u 3.5 U 2A U
(,08.J 28.2J 1290 47,6 952 15.2 896 I 1.9 J
\0.7 J ', I J ?QA J \UJ 16A J LIU 16,5 J 1.8 j
Remediation Tar-get Compounds Remediation Goal (ug/1.)
Volatile Organic Compoumls
Benzene I
Chloroform I
1.2 Dichloroethane I
cis-1.2 Dichloroethene 70
trans-1,2 Dichloroethenc 70
Tetrnchloroethcnc I
Trichloroethcnc 2,8
Vinyl Chloride I
ISemi-Volntile Organic Compound.\·
Nitrobcnzene 10
1\/etah 2
Barium 2000
Beryllium 4
I.cad 15
r.-tanganese 50
Nickel 100
Sores:
I. Eftlu<.'nt ~111pk colk.:1..-d alkr ;iir;trtppcr fo, \'O("s and S\'O(' ,md aft..-, nwial.,
pre11eam1ent in the GE Plam for mccal,
\\ a1<:r in the GE l'lam and after m.:tal; pr.:a.:auncnc: thcrd"orc. GE 111.:tal, cfllu<""nt
con,;ermatiun; do not dirc,;11~ ,·ouc,pond 10 (/RS 111dal,; 1n!l11cn( ,·on,;..-ntralion;
Si11,;c ,\U!;tbl ~000. mc!al., pre11e,,1111cHl of1lic cftluen! ha, lllll h..:cn ,;omluctcd
• Sampl.:, collec1.:d un S•~S 06 due 10 mcml;; dtlucru sampling k»:atiun b..:ing una,·ailahlc
m Jun,· ;:00<,
.'-:.-\ . .'-'uc ;maly1.cd. con.mtuc1111c11w, i11g frnm 11wnitomtg pw!;ram
Ll . .'-"D imlicaics non-c.ktcctabk k1 cl;.
The nu111h..-, mdi,·atcd iu parcmlrc~i., i, (he r<'porting limit
B-con,tm1cnt dctcc1<;d in blank 1..:,ult c,tim,Hcd
J indica1c, au .:;1imat..:d \aluc
Boldcd ,·alu..:s indicate dckckd cor1,·cntrnt,un, g:rc.ttcr than rcmcdiat,on gual
G,\090356/AIT B _ hist G\\' INF-EFF_~009upd.ite . .xls.x
:, ,_ 12/10/2002 '::;i ',
Influent Effluent 1
/uv/1.\ /uu/1.\
ND (5,0) ND ( 1,0)
ND (10,0) ND (2,0)
3.3 .I ND(2,Q)
28,7 ND (2,0)
ND (10,0) ND(2,Q)
198 ND (2,0)
211.0 ND(2,Q)
ND (5,0) ND ( 1,0)
-· ..
59,2 J 17,4 J
0,26 U 0,26 U
L2 u L2 u
322 3.8 J
4,2 ,I LIU
ATTACll ,\I ENT 11
Summary ofGrounchrnter Influent and Efnucnl Resulls Since GRS Start-up
GE l.ighting Systems Annual Performance i\lonitoring
East Flat Rock, North Carolina
, ,:,~3/14/2003' ""~'"' ;:,, , ':'"6/12/2003T~ •. ,. ':" -1 ··91912003 '• '" ~;, 3/2/2004 . ::· -' -. .
Influent Effluent Influent Effluent Influent Effluent 1 Influent Effluent 1
/uo/1,\ /uo/L\ (no/LI /,.o/1,\ {11u/L\ luu/1.\ , .. .,fl.\ (uu/L)
ND ( LO) ND(l,O) ND (5.0) ND(l,0) ND (5.0) ND(LO) ND (5,0) ND ( 1,0)
I. I .I ND (2,0) ND ( 10,0) ND (2,0) ND (10,0) ND (2,0) ND ( 10,0) ND (2,0)
2.2 ND (2.0) 3.4 ND (2 0) 2,6 ND (20) ND (10,0) ND (2,0)
21 ND(2.0) 24A ND (2,0) 30.4 ND (2.0) 34 ND(2.0)
2.4 ND (2,0) ND (10,0) ND(2,Q) ND (10,0) ND (2,0> ND ( 10,0) ND (2,0)
189 ND (2,0) 216 0,5 I J 207 ND (2,0) 241 ND (2,0)
18.7 ND (2,0) 16,9 ND (2,0) 24.3 ND (2,0) 25.3 ND (2,0)
L2 ND I LO) ND (5,0) ND (I 0) ND (5,0) ND(l,0) ND (50) ND ( LO)
NA NA NA NA ND (5,01 ND (5,0) NA NA
54.3 J 0,49 U 65.3 J 5, 7 J 60,4 J 1,8 J 70, I J L9 J
0,26 U 0,26 U 0,26 U 0,26 U 0,26 U (),26 U ,30 U O,JO U
3.3 J L2 u 1,2 u L2 u L9 U L2 u 5 L6 U
664 4,2 J 1030 152 951 31 1290 21, I
15, I J LIU 18,5 J 2,2 J 14,8 J LIU )0,6 J 2, I J
.2 of•l
'9/16/2004' : I~ . ·-""" ... 12/16/2004 ,, , '3/29/2005 " ·-~ .. •: ''::"9/27/2005 ,: :
lnflu("nl Effluent 1 Influent Effluent Influent Effluent Influent Efflucnl
(11<>/Ll (uo/1.) (u~/L} (u~/1.) (ue/1.l (ue/Ll <uo/L\ <uo/L\
ND(LOI ND(l,0) ND ( LO) ND (LO) ND ( LOI ND (1,0) ND ( LO) ND ( LO)
L9 J ND (2.0) 1.4 ND (2 0) I.(, ND ( I ,O) 2,1 ND(LO)
2,7 ND (2,0) 2, I ND (2,0) L7 ND1LO) 2,8 ND ( LO)
18, I ND (2.0) 9.3 ND(2,Q) 9,8 ND ( 1,0) 15,7 ND(l.01
ND (2,01 ND (2,0) ND (2,0) ND (2,0) ND ( LO) ND(l,O) 0,6 ND ( 1,0)
187 ND (2.0) 1(;7 ND (2.0) 133 ND(l,O) 144 ND(LO)
22.9 ND (2.0) 3,0 ND (2,0) 25 ND(l,Ol 5.1 ND(LO)
0,64 J ND (LO) ND ( LO) ND (LO) ND ( LOI ND ( LO) ND (LO) ND(LO)
ND (5,01 ND 15,I) NA NA NA NA NA NA
7L4 8 I ,3 B 72.3 J LI 11 NA NA NA NA
0,30 U O,JO U I ,5 J ,8 U NA NA NA NA
uu uu 3.8 J 2,9 U 4,0 ll 3.3 B 3,0 B 1,2 u
1460 6-t.(1 1310 12,8 J I (,')0 46,4 1580 15.2
18,3 8 8 B 21,3 LI J ?9.5 B 5.5 B 38.? B I All
Remediation Tar-get Compounds Remediation Goal (ug/L)
Volatile Organic Compou,uls
Benzene I
Chloroform I
1.2 Dichlorocthane I
cis-1 .2 Dichlorocthcne 70
trans-1.2 Dichloroethenc 70
Tctrachlorocthcnc I
Trichlorocthcnc 2.8
Vinyl Chloride I
!Semi-Volatile Organic Compot111dfi
Nitrobenzenc 10
1\/etat.,·:
Barium 1000
Beryllium 4
Lead 15
i'..-langancsc 50
Nickel 100
ug.'L -mi.:rograms p.:r 111.:r
I Effl11.:11t ,a111pk .;olk.;t.:d atkr airs!11pp.:1 f.,, \"OC, and S\'OC and afkr m.:tal,
pr.:m:auu.:nt in th.: GE Plam for m.:tal.,
~ Pn"r t" .-\ug:ust ::'.00<,_ 111<.:1;,I;; .:nlu.:ut ,,mipk~ "ere c<,lkctc·d atkr use a, proccs.<
\\al<.:r in Th.: GE l'ldnt and afl.:, m.:l"h pr.:!reatmc·nt. therefor.:. GE Uh'tal,; d)luc"!H
co1Kenlration, du 11\1t d,re.;cly .:onc>1>0ml !O GRS 111e1al,; influent .:onceentration,
Siuce August ]()Ob. m.:tal.s p1<Cl1.:at111.:111 oflh,c d)lucnt ha., not b.:,cn condu.:t,cd
• Samples colkctc"d nu l-:'2l-:-Ob due hi m,c1als diluent sampling hic.ition bc"ing 111i,11·ail,1hk
m Jmu: ::'.006
;\.-\-;'(01 analy1,cd. cm1s1iment rem()\ iug from monitoring pH1gr;u11
li_.'\'[) indicates nun-de1.:.:tabk k,·ds
·111.: number ,ndi.:at,cd in p"r.:nthe.,i,; i, th.: r<'[l{lrting linlll
B-.:011;11111.:111 ,kt.:c1.:d in hlank. re,uh .,,unut,cd
Bold.:d \aluc,; indicate d.:t,ccetc"d concenl1.niun:, greater than remediation goal
GA090356!i\'IT B_ hist G\\' li\'F-EFF _:'.'009updatc.:dsx
; _ ;1 12/9/2005 , ,-,_ "'
Influent Effluent
/u,•/L\ /uo/L\
ND(I.O) ND (1,0)
ND(I.O) ND(I.O)
ND(l.01 ND(I.O)
2.7 ND(l.0)
ND(I.O) ND (1.0)
JJ,2 ND ( 1.0)
0.9 ND I 1.0)
ND ( 1.0) ND ( 1.0)
NA NA
NA NA
NA NA
15 2.0 B
1~80 J~I
70.4 B J5.7 B
ATTACll~IEi\T B
Summary ofGroundw:llcr lnfluenl and Effluent Results Since GKS Start-up
GE Lighting Systems Annual Performance i\lonitoring
East Flat Rock. North Carolin:1
,,1.;_c';-312412006c,: _ --, -'. _,:~6/2712006* ;:''.':! · _ '-/.9121/2006: __ .· >,,Z,_-3/1912007 :: " ,"
Influent Effluent Influent Effluenl Influent Effluent Influent Effluent
(ug/L) (ug/L) (ug/L) (ug/L) (ug/L) (u1?/L) (ug/L) ( u2/L)
ND ( 1.0) ND( 1.0) ND (5.0) ND(I.O) ND(I.O) ND(I.O) ND (1.0) ND (1.0)
1.9 ND (1.0) 2,8 ND (1.0) 2.9 ND I 1.0) I ND (1.01
2 . .5 ND I 1.01 ~-1 ND (1.01 3,1 0,34 J 2 ND ( 1.01
19.4 ND(l.01 10 ND ( 1.0) I 8.8 I. I 10 ND ( 1.0)
O.G3 ND I 1.0) ND (5.0) ND ( 1.0) 0.69 J NDil.Oi ND ( I.OJ ND ( 1.01
172 ND ( 1.0) 205 ND ( 1.0) 171 3.') 150 ND(l.0)
27,J ND (1.01 6,6 ND ( 1.0) 6.(, ND ( I.OJ 7,0 2
ND ( 1.0) ND(I.Ol ND (5.0) ND ( 1.0) ND I 1.0) ND(I.O) ND (1.0) ND ( 1.0)
NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
1.7 13 1.2 u 2.2 B 37,2 3.2 B 4,0 B ND (15) ND (151
l~JO 31.J 2340 831 2870 102 90 90
7 I .8 B 4.3 B 30.9 B ]8.7 1-3 41.6 9.3 B ND (100) ND ( 100)
3 of-I
,• ,:,: -6/1512007 ,' " ' , ;c "-9/19/2007 -,,, ~12//1112007.:·,::•: ', :: -·,J/2812008 ,'. .. Jtl
Influent l•:fflucnl Influent Effluent Influent Effluent Influent Effluent
(ug/L) (ug/L) (ue/Ll (ut1/L) (U!!/L) (U!!/L) (ug/L) (uo/L\
ND ( 1.0) ND(l.0) ND ( 1.0) ND ( \.0) ND(I.Oi ND ( 1.0) 2 ND I 1.0)
ND I 1.01 ND I I .OJ 2 ND(\.01 2 ND I 1.01 2 ND I I .0)
3 ND I 1.0) J ND(l.01 J ND I 1.01 ND(I.O) ND (1.01
22 ND (2.0) 15 ND I 1.0) 17 NDll.0) 14 ND I 1.0)
ND (2.01 ND (2.01 ND ( 1.01 ND (1.01 ND (1.0) ND ( I.OJ ND ( 1.0) ND ( 1.0)
170 ND(l.01 220 ND ( 1.0) 290 ND ( I.OJ 210 ND (1.0)
I 1.0 ND (2.01 35 ND (1.01 42 ND(I.Ol 22 ND (1.01
ND(I.Ol ND (I 01 ND I I.OJ ND ( 1.01 ND(I.OJ ND (1.01 ND ( I .01 ND (1.01
i\lA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
NA NA NA NA NA N.A NA NA
ND(l.01 I ND(l5) ND (15) ND ( 15) ND ( 15) NDiI5) ND (15)
110 1()0 4,500 4,600 J,700 J,300 2,600 2,600
15 ND {5.0) ND(IUO) ND(IOO) ND (1001 ND(IOO) ND ( 1001 ND ( 100)
Remediation Target Compounds Remediation Goal (ug/L)
Volatile Organic Compoum/s
Benzene I
Chloroform I
1,2 Dichloroethane I
cis-1,2 Dichlorocthcne 70
trans-1.2 Dichloroethenc 70
Tctrachlorocthenc I
Trichlorocthene 2.8
Vinyl Chloride I
S'cmi-Volatile Organic Compoumls
Nitrobenzcne 10
1\/eta/J 2
Barium 2000
Beryllium 4
Lead 15
f\fangancsc 50
Nickel 100
u!;.'L -miaognu11,; per liter
I E1tluent ;.ample collected aftcr airn1ippcr for \'OC, and S\'OC and after metals
pretreatment m 1he GE Plant for mewl,;
l'riur tu August 2006, 111ctal;; cftlucnl .,;,mpk.,; "ere ..:l,]kch:d ,1ticr u;e dS pr<icc.,.,
"ate, in the GE Plam and afier mewl., pretrcJt11tc111. thcrdmc, GE metals efllllem
cuncentra1iuns do not dircs:lly com:,;pund 1<l GRS mernh influent ..:oncen1, .. 1ion;
Sim:c .-\ugust 2006. metal:, prc1r<:,H111c111 ofrhc cnlucnt ha, uot hcen s:ouducted
• Samples collected on S12S·0<1 due h> mernl, efllucnt ,,ampling h>c,llion bcmg uua, ;iilahk
in June ::'.006
'.\,\-~ut analy~.cd. con,t1111e111remo1111g ftom mo1utonng pmgra111
U)..:D indicates non-dckctahle le,el,;
The number indicated in pa1enthc;;i5 i, the r.:portin~ l1111i1
B-crn1:Wtucnt detected in blank, r~,ull c,tmiatc·d
J iml1catcs an e,tim;dcd 1;,luc
Bolded \alucs indicat~ dctect~d s:onci:cntrn11011; grca1er than remediation g:oal
Gr\090356/ATI' B_ hist G\\' INF-EFF_~009updatc.:xls:x
' ' ., 6/24/2008,_ •, ,;
Influent Effluent
/ue/Ll ,u~/L\
0.28 .I ND ( 1.0)
11.74 J ND ( 1.0)
2 ND ( 1.0)
13 ND(l.0)
0.29 .I ND ( 1.0)
Jl>O 22
20 0.67 J
ND (1.0) ND (1.0)
NA Nr\
NA NA
NA NA
ND I 15) ND ( 151
2,600 2,600
ND ( 100) ND(IOO)
ATTACHMENT I!
Summary of Gnrnndwaler Influent and Efnucnl Results Since GRS Start-up
GE Lighting Systems Annual Performance Monitor-ing
East Flal Rock. North Carnlina
. ··1117/08. a -· ·'<--;-.. 8nt08 <*'·, ... 9/15/08 ·. >'' ':.,,.-3/27/09 · ,, . . ·,
Influent Effluent 1 lnfluc-nt Effluent 1 Influent Effluent 1 Influent Effluent 1
/ue/L\ luo/L\ /110/L\ /110/LI /uo/1,\ /110/L\ /11~/L\ l,10/I,\
ND ( 1.0) ND(I.O) 0.25 .I ND (1.0) 0.26 .I ND (I 0) ND (1.01 ND(I.O)
3 ND ( 1.0) 2 ND ( 1.0) 2 ND(I.O) LI ND ( 1.0)
4 ND(l.0) 2 ND(l.0) 3 ND ( 1.0) 1.2 ND(I.O)
18 ND (1.0) 11 ND(I.Ol 12 ND (I.OJ 3.5 ND ( 1.0)
ND ( 1.0) ND(l.0) ND ( 1.0) ND(I.O) 0.29 .I ND I 1.0) ND(I.Oi ND ( I.OJ
2311 ND(l.0) 1711 ND(I.O) 1711 ND (1.0) 121 ND(l.0)
9 ND(I.O) 14 ND(I.O) 16 ND (1.0) 8.3 ND ( I.OJ
ND ( 1.0) ND ( 1.0) ND ( 1.0) ND(l.0) ND ( 1.0) ND(I.O) ND ( 1.0) ND I 1.0)
NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Nr\
NA NA NA NA NA NA NA N:-\
NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
NA NA NA NA ND (15) ND { 15) ND (5) ND (5)
NA NA NA NA 2.11111 2,200 2.350 2,450
NA NA NA NA NDillJOJ ND ( 100) 38 35.5
' · '6/9/09.
lnflu('nf Effluent 1
'"'o/L, l,10/L\
NIJ(I.Oi ND/1.0)
I. 7 ND (1.0)
1.8 ND(I.O)
12 ND ( 1.0)
ND(I.OJ ND I 1.0)
178 ND(I.O)
14.3 ND(I.O)
ND ( 1.0) ND(I.Oi
NA NA
NA NA
NA NA
ND (5) ND ( 15)
1,9111 1,8811
J?.8 30.4
ATTACHMENT C
Summary of Surface Water Results Since GRS
Start-Up
'''--'' . .-n
Paramr1rr nwo sws1
,·01a1ik O~anic Compound~ (Ul!,IL)
1.2-D1chlorocthanc 37
Benzene 51
Cl1lornfor111 170
c1:,;-l . .2-Dichlnrocthcne 4_900
TctrachlonK·thcnc J.J
trn1b-I .2-Dichl{noethe1K· i0.000
rrich!nroethene 30
Vinyl chloride >t
Sl·mi-Yolalik Organk Cnmpnunct., (ug/1,)
N11rohcnzc1K JO
~ktah (ugll.)
Barium 200.000
Rcryllium (, 5
Leatl 25
Manganese :\'L
l\ickcl 88
PCBs Total {UJ!/L) ..
'''--1-'L,•I'\
Parnml"lrr nwo sws1
\'olatik Organic Cornpountb (uJ!/L)
1.:::'.-Dich!oro.:thanc 37
[knZt'llC 51
Chlornfo1m 170
c i~-1 .2 -Dichlonwthcnc .t.900
T ctrnc hlorncthcne J .. l
tran~-l .::'-Dichlnroetlwne 10.000
Trichlorocthcnc 30
VinY! chloride 2.4
ui;,L. m,cmgram, per h1er
• ~\\'-1 was not sampled due In dry conditions
lJ.c'o"[) -not dc1ecied
J.dctcctcd. es11tna1ed rcSL1i1
l lJ-not detected. !ktecuon Limn approximate
[).d,lut1011 sample
E-exceed cahbrauon limn
B-fo,md III blan~
.. .
SW-I
ND (2_0)
ND (1.0)
ND /2.0)
ND C:.0)
ND (:::'..0}
ND (2.0)
ND (2 0)
ND {1.0)
ND (6 0)
16.7 .1
0.5 U
l.:::'. U
-H6 .1
2.0 .I
ND {0 5)
·-·-:~ .
SW-4
ND C OJ
ND (1 OJ
ND (2 0)
ND (2.0)
0 7 .I
ND (2.0)
ND (2 0)
NLJ {1 0)
,-\TTACH1\IE~TC
Summary of Surface Water Results Since GRS Start Up
CE Lighting Systems ,\nnu:tl Performance 1\lonitoring
East Flat Rock, i'l'orth Carolina
SevtrmhCr 2000• • ~-~-b Septcmhcr200t:· · .
SW-2 SW-3 1· SW-I I SW-2 I SW-J
ND (2.0) ND (2.0) ND (20) ND (2.0) ND (.2 0)
Nil (\.0) ND ( 1.0) ND (1.0) Nil (l.O) ND (1.0)
ND /2.0) ND (2.0) ND (2_0) ND (2_0) NIJ (2 0)
ND /2.0) ND (2,0) ND (:'0) ND (:::'. 0) 0,'[) (,2,0)
:'.Ji 2.0 ;,.JI) (20) I.I .I 1.6 .I
i\'D ('.:'. 0) i\'i) (2 0) ND (2.0) ND(U.11 ( 2.0) 0,"[) (:::'. 0)
ND (2 0) ND (2.0) ND CO) ND (2.0) ND (2.0)
ND (1 0) 0,'!) (l 0) NO {1 0) ND(ll.ll (l 0) ND ( 1 0)
ND ( 5.0) ;-,..:[} (5 0) ND () 0) "[) (5.:-l ND (:-.:-)
11 SJ> .I 24.2 .I 13.:: .1 :::LS .I 29.0 J
0,6 IJ () s \J 0.22 \J o.::::: \J O_ --i~ II
4.J .I 1.2 \J 1.9 \J 1 .4 U '' II
11.4 .I 76 6 J 28.1 -ll.9 I .l 1
19.: .I ::: 9 \J 0.80 I J 0,8() \J 0 so lJ
Nil (0,5) ND (O:-) ND (0 _';) ND (0.5.'.') ND ((I_';)
Seltemller 2000 . .. -. -se 11Cmber,200J.· •.¥~ ..,~. -
sw-:-S\\'-6 S\\'-4 S\\'-5 S\\'-(,
ND (2 0) ND (2,0) ND (2.0) ND (20) ND (2 0)
ND ( 1.0) ND (1.0) ND (\.0) ND {1 0) ND (1.0)
ND ( 2.0) ND (2,0) ND (:::'.0) N!l (2.0) ND (20)
NJ) (2 0) ND (2 0) ND (2_()) ND (2 0) ND (20)
" ND (2.0) 0.49 .I ::: . .1 0.67 .I
ND ND ;,-..'I) (20J 0,'l} (2_0) ND {2.0) ND (:::'. 0)
ND :,.,;rn NlJ (2,0) ND (2.0) ND c::: 0) NlJ (2,0)
ND ND ;\'D (1.0) NlJ (!.0) ND {1.0) ND (1.0)
II SW-I*
\'-4
M) (2.0)
ND (].OJ
l\'D (:'._OJ
i'\'D (2.0)
ND (2.0)
ND (:'..OJ
;\'[) (2,0)
;,..:[) (1.0)
'?e, 15.-\ :-;-(' AC ~B (m u,:·L). fm \'OC,. the ,1and;,rd., i;enerall) reflect lm,nan he.,hh (II!/) cnrer,a TI,crcare no 11!I cmeria for lead n, n,c~el and therefore !lieu fre,hwiller aquauc life crneroa ha,e i>een nscd
I nf .1
St•p1cmhcr 2002 I I SW-2 I SW-J
Nil (::0) (2 0) ND
Nil (l 0) ( I.OJ Nil
Nil (2,0) c:.oi NIJ
ND (:::'. 0) (20) NfJ
0 57 .I I .J .I
NIJ (20) (2 0) ;-...'D
ND (2_0) (2,0) 0,"[)
Nil ( 1.0) (I 0\ 0,'[)
I\'[) ( 5 2) N!l (5.0)
27.1 J 27.7 .1
0.26 U 0.26 \J
2 s J 2.') .I
(,-l,4 .io. 1
I I IJ I I II
0.27 .I ND (0 5 l
Sentember 2002: • -
SW-5 SW-6
ND (2.0J ;,-JI) (2.0J
ND (I.OJ ND (I.OJ
ND (2.0) ND (2,0)
ND (C 0) ND (2 0)
:::'..6 0.61 .1
ND (2.0) ND (2.0)
ND (2_0) ND (2 0)
ND (1.0) ND /I.OJ
.... \,,, ""' . . '
Parnml'ler nw<1 sws1 SW-I
\'ol:llik Oreauil' Cnmpo111uh (ue/L)
1.2-Dichloructhanc 37 0.'!J r::: O)
Benzene .'.'I ND (1.0)
Chloroform 170 ND r:::_O)
Cl~-1.2-Dichlrn 1wthc1w ~.90(1 Nil (2.0)
Tctrachlonicthcnc J.J ND (2_0)
trnns-1 _2-!Jichlnnicthcnc \0.000 ND (2.0)
Trichlorocthcnc JO ND (2.0)
Vinyl chlnridc " ND (1.0)
Scmi-\'nlatik Org;rnfr Compound~ (ug/L)
Nitrohenzcne JO ND ( 5.3 l
~letal~ (ui:/L)
Barium :::oo_ooo JU .I
fkryllium 6.5 OJ {j
Lead 25 ..\_O .I
1\-fangancsc ;,..'L 37.6
J\"ickcl RS 3.2 .I
PCB, Tola\ (1w/L) .. t--'D (0.52 l
II .~~-" " ... . ·. _.-;,".-"-." ,. D\\'O sws1 SW-4
l\'olalil<• O!'eank Compound~ (ug/L)
1.:::-Dichlonwthanc .l) ND (2.fl)
I Benzene 51 ND (l.0)
'hloruform 170 ND (2.0)
is-1.2-Dichlnrocthcnc .i.900 J\'D (2.0)
Tctrachlomcthcnc 3.3 1.2 .I
trans-1.2-Dichlorocthcnc 10.000 ND (2.0)
Trichlorocthcne JO ND (2.0)
VinYI chloride :::.--1 ND (l.0)
lll,"L. nucroi;rams pe, lncr
:-SA-nm sampled. dropped f"'"' list per liSF.P.-\ and :-,:cl)E:-,:R
11_:-,:n -no1 dct«lcd
J-dc1ec1ed. c<-trnM!cd rc,uh
t IJ.,10\ deiec1ed. lkux:1mn l.un11 appro,,m,,1c
D-d,lunon sample
E-exceed cahhrni,i,11 hnut
B-fnund ,n hlanl.
ATTACll,\IF:;\'T C
Summary of Surface Water Results Since C.RS Start lJp
GE Lighting Syslcnu Annual Performance ~fonitoring
East Flat Rock. ;\'orth Carolina
Scrltemhcr 2003· · SeptCmhcr 2004
SW-2 SW-3 I SW-I I SW-2 I SW-J
ND (20) NIJ (:::.oi ;,..![) CO) ND (2 0) ND ( :::.oi
l\'D (l 0) ND (1.0) ND ( I OJ ND ( I 0) ND ( Ul)
ND (2 0) ND (20) ND r::: 01 ND (2 0) Nil (2.0)
ND (2.0) ND (:::'..0) NIJ (2.0) ND (2 0) ND (2.0)
0 9 .I I .J .I Nil (2.0) ND (2 0) I I .I
)\'[) (2.0) ND (2 0) ND (2.0) ND (2.0) ND (::: 0)
ND (2.0) ND (2,0) ND (2.0) ND (20) ND (2,0)
ND (\.0) t-,'[) (1,0) ND (1.0) ND ( 1.0) ND ( I 0)
;-.;D i 5 3 l ND (5 2) ND ( 5.1 l ,\"I) (5 1 l NI> (5 I l
20.S .I 30.S .I :::1::: B :::6.S ll 39.J ll
OJ u 0.3 lJ OJ lJ 0 . .3 lJ 0,3 lJ
1.::: u l.2 IJ l.2 lJ 1.2 lJ 1.2 IJ
J..\_9 71...\ 5.S.J IJ S9_ I IJ9
I I IJ I.I lJ O.S R !.J ll 16 ll
ND (05.'.) ND (0.51) ND (0 51) ND (fl 51 l ;,..'[) (() ~ 1)
, Sentember 2003 ;\ -,.,
I '· • .. :-s -seetember 2004
SW-3 SW-(, SW-4 I sw.:-I SW-<>
ND (2,0) ND (2.0) ND (2.0) ND (2.0) t-,'I) (2_0)
ND (1 0) ND (l.O} ND (l 0) ND (I.OJ i\'IJ (1.0)
ND (20) ND (:::.oi ND (20) ND (2.0) ND (2.0)
ND (2.0) ND /2.0) ND (2.0) ND (:'..0) i','[) (2.0)
I 8 .I 0.6 .I ND (2.0) 07 .I 0,9 .I
ND {2,0) ND (2.0) ND (2.0) ND (:'..O} ND (.'.!.O)
ND C.Ol ND (2.0) ND (2.0) ND "0) ND {2_0)
ND (1.0) ND (1.0) ND (1.0) ND (I.OJ ND (1.0)
II :,i\\'-1
0.'IJ (1.0)
ND (1.0)
ND (1.0)
ND (I 0)
ND (\.0)
ND (I OJ
ND (\.0)
ND (1.0)
NA
N,\
NA
:::.1 ll
:::1.6
I I {j
ND (0 . ..\S)
II
_, ,. .,
SW-..\
ND ( I 0)
ND ( 1.0)
ND (1 0)
ND (1 0)
ND (1 0)
ND (1 0)
ND (1.0)
ND (1.0)
'Perl.SA :--:C,\C 21l (tn ll!!'I.). for\"()(",_ 1hc standard., i,,cllcrally ref1cct hun,an be.,l1h {I Ill) cr11ena n1crc arc,,,, HH c111croa for le~rl m mc\.el and thctcfnrc then frcshw~ter aq,uiic l,fc cr,te11a ha,c hccn 1,-cd
G,\0')()J5ti'.-\TT C _h,stor,c S\I' results ,I, ~ nf .l
September 2005
I I SW-2 I S\\'-J
ND (1.0) ND ( I 0)
)\[) ( I 0) NU fl 0)
ND (1.0) :--.'D (1.0)
ND (1.0) ND ( I 0)
0.74 .I 0 81 .I
ND (1.0) t-,'[) ( 1,0)
ND (I 0) ND (1.0)
ND (\.0) ND ( I.OJ
N,\ NA
;,..;,\ N,\
;\",-\ ;,..',\
2 S ll ,.1 ll
~ 1 ..\ 52.0
1.2 R I.I IJ
0.7 ND (O...\S)
Seetember 2005· -I I SW-:-I S\V-6
ND (1 0) ND ( l.0)
l',:D (1.0) Nil (l.<i)
t\'D (1 OJ Nil (l.O)
ND (1.0) Nil (1.0)
I.I ND (1.0)
N"D (1 0) ND (LO)
ND (1.0) ND (1.0)
i'-,"[) (1 0) ND (!.0)
.... \.,, .. .. ,
l'arnnwtrr nwo ,..;wsI sw.1
Yob,tilr O11?.anir Compo111uh (uf;/1.)
I.2-1)1chlon1L'thane )7 NO (I 0)
Benzene '.'I ND (1.0)
Chlonifnrm 170 ND /I Ol
Cl~· l .2-!)ichlonwthenc -l.90() ND (1.0)
r ctrachloroethcnc )_) ND (I 0)
trans• I .::!-Dich lnrncthcne )0,flOO ND (I Ol
Ti ichlornethcnl' JO ND (1.0)
Vinvl chlomk 2.4 ND (I OJ
~ktah (ug/1.)
Lead 25 l.S B
Mangane~e NL 37.1
:\ich:I " 0,8 I/
PClh Total (m•/L) --ND (0.60)
,, ... ,,,.,,, .... ": _;,, , -:.:--·-•·, _.,
P11ramt•ter nwoswsI sw . .f
\'nlalik Org;mir Cnmpound\ (ug/1,)
I.::'-l)ichloroclhanc .17 Nll (\,0)
Benzene 51 ND (1 0)
Chloroform 170 ND (LO)
cis-1.2•Dichlornethene 4,900 ND (\.0)
Tctrnchlorocthcnc J.J 0.6::! .I
1ram• l .::!•Dichlnroe1he11e 10.000 ND /1.0)
Trichloroethenc JO ND (l.O)
V11wl chlomk 2.4 ND (\.0)
\o/r,:
N,\·nnl samplNI. droppc-d from li<I rcr liSEP,\ and :,.;CDE:-;R
1 ! :-.:n -no1 dctecicd
I-detected. cs11matcd result
\ IJ-nnt detected. lk1ec1,nn L,mn apprn~•mate
J>-d,h,ucm ,ample
E·c~cccd cal,hraunn limn
B•found on hlan~
ATTACll~1E~T C
Summary of Surface Water Results Since GRS Start Up
C.E Lighting Systems Annual Performance ;\'lonitoring
East Flat Rock. ~orth Carolina
Se11fl'mhc1·.2006. · Ser lt'mhcr-200i ' .
S\\'-2 S\\'.J S\\'.J SW-2 sw.J
Nil (I 0) ;,..,;[) { 1.0) ;,,..'[J (l 0) ;\'!) (1.0) ;,,.'I) (1.0)
ND (!.0) i\'LJ (1 0) j\,'[) (\.0) ND (1 0) ND ( 1 0)
t',1!) (1.0) ND I I Ol ND / I OJ ND (1.0) ND ( I 0)
ND (1.0) :-."LJ I I 0) ;,,..'[) (l 0) ND /1.0) ND (1 0)
0.91 -' 1.2 ND ( l 0) ND (1 0) :-..Tl (1.0)
ND (1.0) ND ( l 0) j\,'[) (l.0} ND (I 0) ND (l O)
:\'D (1.0) t\'D f I 0) ND I l OJ ND (1 0) ND ( I 0)
Nil (l 0) t\'D (I 0) ND (1 0) ND (I 0) 0,'I) (1 0)
1.7 lJ 1.7 1/ ND ( I 5 l ;-.,.'I) ( 15 l ;,..'I) ( 1 5 l
-16.-1 S-l.::' ;,,:I) (501 ;,,:I) (501 i0 /50)
0_/1 1/ 0,/1 1/ ND (l/lOJ ND ( I nn1 ND (lOOl
ND (0.53) ND 10 50) ND (1 0) NI> {I.OJ ND I I 0)
· Seritem I ~-· ''·--" -Sentcmlicr,2007 ···= . --.:,--sw.s SW \'-.f sw.s S\\'.f,
ND (\.0) ND ( 1.0) Nil (1.0) Nil (1.0) [\'[) ( I 0)
ND (\ 0) 0,'[) ( 1.0) ND (l 0) ND (1.0) ND { I 0)
ND (l.O) ND { 1.0) ND (1 0) ND (1.0) ;,,..'[) { 1.0)
ND (l.0) ND ( I.OJ ND (1.0) ND (I 0) ;,-..·[) (1.0)
1.8 0 62 _I ND (I.fl) J.0 (1.0) NIJ r I 0)
ND (\.0) ND { I.OJ ;,,,![) (1 0) ND (1.0) ND { 1.0)
ND 11.0) ND (1.0) ND (1.0) ;,.,•I) (I.OJ :-..·D (I 0)
ND (l.0) ND (I.fl) ND (1,0) ND (1.0) NIJ ( I 0)
S\\'· I
t','[) (l 0)
t',.'[) (1,0)
t\'D (l.0)
ND (l OJ
ND (1 0)
ND ( 1.0)
ND ( I 0)
;--.:[) (1 0)
i\ [) ( 15 1
:,,.;[) (50\
ND (](l()J
ND ( I 0)
-: •,: N ;'.• • •
S\\' . .f
ND ( I 0)
ND ( 1.01
ND (1.0)
i',.'[) (1 0)
ND ( 1.0)
t-,..'!) 11.0)
ND (1.0)
ND ( 1,0)
1 Pc, 15,\ :'\CAC :R (m u,c•L). for \'OCs. the siandards ~encrally reflecl human health (Ill!) cmcroa TI,ere arc nc, HJ! cmer,a for lc.1d or mdcl and therefore then frc,h".itct aqua11c-hfc emend ha,e h-een used
; nf1
St>utcmbcr 2008
S\\'.z S\\'-.l
ND (1.0) ;\I) (1.0)
ND (1.0) ;\'[J (I 0)
N!J ( I 0) NIJ ( I 0)
ND (I 0) ;,,..'I) (1.0)
ND {1.0) :--.'I.) (1.0)
NU ( 1.0) ND (1.0)
ND (1.0) NIJ (LO)
ND {1.0) ;-..'!) (l.0)
.-.;I) t 15 l \'!) ( 15)
(,0 (50) 70 (501
NJ> (100) ND ( 100)
ND (I Ol ;-..'D (l.0)
.Sentembt'r 2008 . _, . .-~ , .. -SW-3 ,',;\\'.(>
Nil (1.0) i\lJ (1.0)
NI> (1.0) ND ( l 0)
ND ( 1.0) ;,,..;[) (1 0)
ND (\ 0) ND (1.0)
1 ( 1.0) ;,.,'!) (l 0)
ND ( 1,0) NIJ (l.O)
:,,.:[) (I 0) ;-..'[) (1.0)
ND (1.0) t\'D /1.0)
ATTACHMENT D
Summary of Sediment Results Since GRS
Start-Up
ATTACII M Ei\T D
Summary of Sediment Results Since GRS St:trt Up
GE Lighting Systems Annual Perform:rnce Monitoring
East Flat Rock, i\'orth Carolin.1
' ,, ' i Seiitember 2000 ,, '. Sentcmbei-2001 ., :-
,'\T Srdimrnt "
J'an-1mrlcr Sta!Hfanl~
Volatile Organic Compound.'-(11!!/kc:)
1.2-!)ichlowethanc NL
Benzene NL
IIChlonilimn NL
11ci:--l .2-[Jichloroctlwnc ;--..'L
Tetrachlorncthenc :\'L
trans-I .2-1 )ich lmoclhcnc NL
Trichlnn1cthene NL
Vinyl chloride NL
IIS<'mi-\'olatilc Or·g:rnic Compound~ (ug/kg)
N1trnhc111:enc
.\l<'tab (mg/k2:)
Rarium
Beryllium
Lead
I'\·langmlt'Sl'
Nid;cl
rcB~T<fl".-\L (ug/kg)
ugil-;g -111 inogra1n per I,, 1logr;1n1
m:tkg • 1111ll1gra111 per \..,l,igram
NL
NL
NL
NL
~'L
NI.
1000
\j),:[l -Sot Detected (rep,,nmg le-el ,ho,"1 in p,uenthes1s)
SED-1 SED-2
ND ( 7 .5) ND (7 0)
ND I 7 5) NIJ (7 ll)
ND ( 7.5) ND (7 Ill
ND (i .5) ND (70)
ND (7 5) ND (i.0)
ND ( i .5) ND (7 0)
ND (i .5) ND (i ,0)
~'[) (i.5) ND (i.0)
Nil (480 fl) Nil 1480 ll)
:n.s J 32.7
0.19 II 04 J
2.2 .I 3 I J
23.0 J 73.9 .I
2.3 .I 3.1 J
Nil J (48 fl) 238.0
J -lktccted hut resull 1s ;m c~1imme a, ,tis het"een 1hc method detectmn lnmt and the report mg lnnn
IJ.l -Snl Detected. 1epnrt1ng 1111111 appr,1ximate
R-\'()CIS\"()(' found 111 bl:m~. mewls cs11111a1cd
;-.:,\ -:,.;.,l ,1n.1ly;:ed per rn·1~1,111s to R{i\'P Ill :005
NI. -Sot l1~ted
G.-\0()().1561,\ TT ll _htsllmc _,cd results xis
SED-3 SED-1 SEl>-2 SED-J
J\'[) (6.3) ND (U.1) (7.5) j\.'1)/\JJ) (i 0) NDf!J.I) (6 I
NIJ (6.>) ND((Jl) (i' 5) ND (lj,1) (7.0) ND (U.I) (6 I
ND (6 ~) ND(IJJ) (7 .5) ND (IJ.I) (7.0) ND flJJ) (6 I
ND (6.3) ND (U.I) (i.S) NDCUJ) (i 0) ND(U.l) (6 I
;\'[) (6.3) ND(UJ) (7.5) ND (IJJ) (i.O) ND(iJ.1) (6 I
ND (6.3) ND (IJ.1) (i.5) ND (IJ.J) (7 OJ ND ({JI) (6 I
ND (6.3) ND ((J.l) (i 5) ND (Ii.I) (i.O) ND r!.1.1) (6 I
i",.'[) (6 3) N!J (IJ.I) (i.5) NDCUJ) (i.O) ND HJ.1) (6 I
N!J (4700) ND (.,6() fl) ND (j 10 fl) N!J (440_())
]9.:i .I 35.2 19.5 lJ 25.9
()_ 17 lJ fU4 u 0.2 u 0.23 u
3.8 J 5 .➔ J " J 4.0 J --
150.0 J !05.0 44.4 P' __ ,_) J
I 7 J 4.6 J 2.0 J 2.8 u
90.7 ND (3(,,0) 34(, 87,2
l nf 3
' Se Jtcmber 2002
SEil-i SIW-:? SED-J
ND ((1.6) ND (.:'i.5) ND (6.9)
ND ((1.6) ;-,.,•n ( 5.5) ND ((i 9)
ND (6.6) ND (:'i.5) ND ((,,9)
;\'[) (6.6) 0-'[) (5.5) ND (6.9)
;,...'[) (6.6) :--.'!) (:'i.5) ND (6.9)
ND (6.{1) ND CU) ND (6.9)
ND (6.6) ND (:i.5) ND (6_9)
i\.'D (6.6) ~'[) (5.') ND (6 9)
ND (J(i(}_()) ND (200,fl) ND (210.0)
10.3 J 13.1 J 1-U J
0.027 lJ 0.033 u O.fU2 u
2.3 J 3.:i J 2.4 J
3i.9 J 33.3 J 102.0 J
1.5 J I.J J 1.6 J
ND (42.0) 217 32.1
'.\'C Srdiml'nt
l'arnmrtrr Sla111.fartls
\'oli1tilC' Organic Compounds (ug/kl!)
1.2-l)ichloroc!hanc NI.
l~cnzcnc NL
Chhiroform NL
i.:is-I .2-Dichloroc1hcnc NL
Te1rnchlorocthcnc NL
\rans-1.2-1 )ichloroethcne NL
Trich!nrncthcnc NL
Vinyl chloride NL
Sl'mi-Vo\atik Organic Compound.~ (ug/kg)
Ni1rnhcnt.l'nc
,\ll'tab (mglk2:)
Barium
!kryllium
Ll'<l<l
i\-·langancsc
Nkkcl
l'CBsTOTAL (u2:/k2:)
u,:il,~ -m1crn,:r.11n per\.. tlogr:un
mg•\..g -m1ll 1gra1n per blugran1
NL
NL
NL
NL
NL
NL
1000
l!.;\()-,'\ot Detected (repmtmi,: le,·el sho"n m p,ucmh,...,1~)
.1 -[)Nectcd hut rt>.<Ull ,, an t'.'>t1m;,1,_,. ;,_, ll 1, hc1,1 l'"Cn the nwth"d
lJ.1-:,.,:r,1 lktcctcd. r,_,.portm'c' hmu approx1m.itl'"
H-\'OC/5\"0f" found 111 hl;,n\... mewls e,um~ted
:,.,:,\ -:,.,;,,t an;,ly~cd pN rcva:;ams ln R(i\"P Ill :005
NL-:,,:,it h,1~d
(j,\i)<}(J.l51>1,\ TT ll_ho,tor,c sed re.suit, xls
A TTACII M E,';T D
Summary of Sediment Results Since GRS Start Up
GE Lighting Systems 1\nnu:d Performance ;\:Jonitoring
East Flat Rock. North Carolina
-. Sentember.2003 Senten1bcr 2004
SEl>-1 SED-2 SED-J SW-I SW-2 SW-J
NIJ (7 2) ND (9.3) ND (7.2) N!J OUl ND (12.()) ND (16.0)
ND (7 2) ND (9.3) ND (7.2) ND (R 7) ND ( 12.0) ND ( 1 (d))
Nil (7 2) ND (9.3) Nil {7.2) Nil (8, i) ND (12 0) ND (l(dl)
ND (7 2) ND (9.,) ND (7.2) ND (R 7) ND ( 12.0) ND (l(dl)
NIJ (7 .2) 7. i J ND {7.2) ND (8, 7) 11.8 .I ND (16.0)
ND (i.2) ND (9.3) ND (7.2) ND {R.7) Nil {12 0) ND {l(dl
;'\f) <1.:n ND (9 ,) ND (i.2) :--'ll {R.7) ND (12.0) ND ( I (,.0
:-..!D (7.2) ND (9.3) ND (i.2) :--'D OU) ND ( 12.0) ND (16.0
ND (240.0) ND {210.0) ND (240.0) ND {210.0) :--'!J {200.0) :--'D {220.0)
17 .3 J rm J 17.2 J I 7 .0 B 23.5 B 37.6
0.038 u 0.035 J o 037 u 0.14 BU 0.22 B 0.31 (l
2.6 () 8.2 J 35.(1 3.0 H 2.4 B :!5.)
82.5 J 49.4 J 124 J 47.7 /,8 I I (19
1.8 J 09 J 2.5 J 1.9 B 18 H 4.6 (l
Nil (24.0) 374 52.4 ND (21.0) !13 59.9
2 of 3
Sentember 2005 ..
S ED-I SED-2 SED-J
ND (< 8) ND (:i.2) ND (6.6)
ND (58) ND (:i.2) ND (6.6)
ND (< 8) ND (:i.2) ND (G.(1)
ND (5 8) ND (:i.2) ND (6.6)
ND (5 8) ;,-![) (<.2) ND {6.6)
ND (5 R) ND (5.2) ND (6.6)
ND (' 8) ND (5.2) ND (h.6)
ND (' 8) ;--.=[) (:i.2) ;--.=n (()_6)
N,\ :--:A :--',\
NA NA N,\
NA NA N,\
2.1 B (0 B :;.4 B
5(1.3 33.4 189.0
1.6 B ( ( B I .!J B
ND (21 .0) 97.9 J 47.7 J
,'\T .Srdirnl·nt
Parameter St:1n<lanb
\'olalik ()rganic c:nmpounds (ui.:lk!,!)
l .2-Dichlnrnl.'lharn.: NI.
Benzene NL
Chloroform NI.
cis-1.2-Dichlnroechenc NL
·1·e1rachlorocthc11c NI.
trnns• 1.2•Dichlorocthc11c NL
Trichlorocthcnc NL
Vinyl chloride NL
.S<'mi.\'olatilr Organic Compountb (ug/kg)
Nitrobcnzene
,\h-tal.~ (ml!lkg)
Rarium
Bcryll1u111
Lead
l'vlangam:sc
Nkkcl
l'C:lkr<H:\L (ug/kg)
ug,l..g • m1crntr:im pl.'"r l;,logram
mgil;g -m,lhgram pe, \..ol,ipam
NL
NL
NL
NI.
NI.
NL
1000
1,·.:-,.:0 • :,.,;01 De1ec11.'"d (rl.'"p<.1mng k,·el sh(mn m p.irl.'"mhcsisl
J -Detl.'"cted bu1 result 1s .111 e~t1m.11e ;i~ 11 is hen,l.'"1.'"n the 1111.•th"d
l."J. :,.,;01 Detected. repnrtm!_: limn appr,1~1ma\l.'"
B-\·oc1S\"OC found m hl.ink. metals esumated
:,.,;,\. :-,.:,11 analyzed per re\"1sions 10 RG\'P m :_005
:,.,;1,. :,.,;ot l1.sted
G,\()<)0_15(:,1,\lT ll_histnr1c ~<'d r<',uh.s xls
ATTACII M ENT D
Summary of Sediment Results Since GRS Start lip
GE Lighting Systems Annu:il Performance i\lonitoring
East Fl:tt Rock. i\'orth C:irolina
(· Sentem ber 2006 Sentembei'2007
SED-1 SED-2 SED-J SEil-i SED-2 SED-J
ND (Ci.5) ND (5 7) ND (5. 1) ND (7 3) [\'!) (6 'I ND (5. 7)
ND (6.5) ND (.5.7) ND (5. 1) ND (7 ,) ND (6.5) ;,..,'!) (.5. 7)
ND (6.5) ND (5. 7) )\']) {.5.1) ND (7_:1,) ND (6.5) ND (5. 7)
)\'[) (6.5) ND (5. 7) ]'\'!} (5. 1) ND (7.3) ND (6.5) ND (5. 7)
ND (6 5) ND (5.7) ]\.'!) (5. I) ND (7'} ND (6.5) ND (5. i)
ND (6.5) :--.'D {5. 7) ND ('.II ND (7. I ND (6 5) ND (5. 7)
;-,...!!) (6.5) :-,..'D ('. 7) ;-...'D ( 5. 1 l ND (7 I ND (6 5) ND (5. 7)
ND (6 5) ND (5. 7) ND ('.II ND (} ) ND (} 3) ND ( I I)
NA NA NA NA NA ;-,...!,\
NA NA :-,..•A NA ;'\'A NA
NA N,\ NA NA !\',\ NA
1.9 B OS B 2.1 B 6.:; :; 4 2.2
38 1 l 2.2 :'i 7 .0 ())_() Si 0 J 40.0
1.7 B 06 B 0.9 B 4.3 2.3 I 7
ND (23.0) 20.2 J 42. ! J ND ( :'ii) 280 0,']) (-15)
3 of 3
Sentembcr 2008· . .. .
SEl>-1 .SED-2 ."iED-J
Nil ((1.')) NfJ (.5.7) ND (6 I I
ND ((,_()) ND ().7) ND (6. 1)
ND ({,_()) ND (5. 7) ND (6. 1)
;,...•]) (6_()) ND (5. 7) ND (6. 1}
<',']) (6.9) :-,..•!) (5.7) ND (6.1)
ND (6.9) ;-...'D (S 7) ND (6. 1)
;--.:I) {6.()) ;-...']) (5.7) ;'\'!) (6.1)
ND (14) M) (II) ND ( 12)
NA NA NA
N1\ NA NA
J\'A NA N,\
5 4 (,
47 47 liO
ND (3.1 l ND (2.8) ND (2. 7)
ND (51 l 53 )3
ATTACHMENTE
September 2008 Potentiometric Surface Map
RWSF-2
(2154,7 S
6b \ ♦ '""
'l.fW-64 l 2760
Note: Groundwater elevations based on measurements collected on 15 Sept 2008,
Potentiometric contours created using Kriging and professional judgment
0 Piezometer --Potentiometric surface elevation contour (2 ft msl)
• Site monitoring well ~ Potentiometric surface depressions
♦ Recovery well -Bat Fork Creek
-$-Inactive recovery well C3 wetlands
2162
2164-
Well Name: MW-64
Groundwater Elevation: 2167.59 '.
N
Ll--lc---lr'7
__l.._.-=-+c.i-P-t-;r~i-{t-f'-t'r.l L--~ ::::~~~~---.-r---_~'__;:"-O::::::e._.Jeo ;-.::::::=-.J I
Geosyntec 1>
consultants
Kennesaw, GA 01-DEC-2008
400 200 0
Potentiometric Surface Elevation
on September 15, 2008
East Flat Rock, NC
400 Feet
Figure
2-1
ATTACHMENT F
Summary of Influent and Effluent Air Results
Since GRS Start-Up
. ~orth Carolin:1 .· ,,._ .-.; ,.., ,,:: _;, 10/17121,00:·, ."-:"~:-~:~+~':-_ .
Remediation Taq~et Air Slandanl1 Influent Effluent
Comnound~ flh/nl u~/rn ·' lb/yr ui.:/m ·' lb/yr
Benzene 8.1 0.89 0.02 ND (.64) 0.02
Chlorolimn 240 20 0.56 ND(.96) 0.03
1.2 Dichlorrn:thane 260 45.7 1.27 ND(.801 0.02
trans-1.2 Dichloroc!hcnc N.-\ N:\ N:\ NA Ni\
cis-1.2 D1chloroc1hcnc N:\ ISi 5.05 ND (.78) 0.02
Tc1rnchlorocthcnc 13.000 2140 59.70 ND(l.3) 0.0.J
Trichloroc1hrnc 4.000 163 -l.55 ND (I.I) 0.03
Vin, I Chloride 26 1.4 0.04 ND (.51 l 0.01
,\"orth Carolina ::::~Yf' .-.:':~ ·•.·,y_, 6/1112002 --: · "-.:: -~ -. ..
< -y,,.;
Remediation Target .-\ir Slandanl1 Influent Effluent
Comnounds flh/nl ug/m ·' lb/yr ug/m ·' lh/yr
l3enze111.· SI ,-_, 0.6-t 5.1 0 [.j
Chlorofonn 290 20 0.56 17 0.-17
1.2 Dichloroethant· 260 4(1.5 I 13 42.9 1.20
trans-1.2 Dichloroclhcnc Nt\ 5.5 0. 15 ND (0.79) 0.02
cis-1.2 Dichloroclhcnc N.-\ 249 6.95 281 7 S.J
Tctrachl11rocthenc 13.000 1800 )0.21 7.4 0.21
Trichloroethcne 4.000 160 446 6.9 0.19
Vin,·[ Chloride 26 II 0.,1 13 0 36
~orlh Carolina ; " .. .~..:~:. :-: >' 9/2912004 , , · ·;;-,· .,
Remedi:1tion Target Air S1and:1rd1 I nfluenl Effluent
Comnounds tlh/nl ug/m ' lh/yr ug/m ' lh/~T
l3cnzcnc 8.1 I.I 0.03 Nil (0.4> ()_()]
Chloroform 290 2.9 0.08 1.8 0.05
1.2 llichlorocthanc 260 4 8 0.13 4.6 0. 13
trans-1.2 Did1loroc1hcnc N:\ ()_79 0.02 0.75 (l.(J2
cis-1.2 DichltirnelhL'ne i\.':\ 38 1.06 34_.:.1 0.96
·rc1 rachl1,roc1hern: 13.00(1 209 5.83 O.X I 0.02
Trichlon1ethcnc . .t.()00 34.3 0.96 (, 0.17
\'in\'[ Chloride 26 1.2 0.03 1.4 (l.04
:\"orth Carolina . ~ ;::-. "T. '"'"9115/2008 .?C ~· :-s....7.;.;
Remediation Target .\ir Slandard1 lnlluenl Effluenl
Comnound-. llh/ul 11:,?;flll ·' lb/yr ui/111 '
knzenc 8 I .j 0.10 0.8
,._,'hllirof"orm 290 r _, 0.6,1 21.0
1.2 Dichloroe!h:me 260 30 0 84 35.0
ltrans-1.2 [)id1lonic1he11e NA .t.3 ()_ 13 4.2
·is-1,2 l)ichloroc1hene i\',\ 110 3.1 130.0
l"ctrachl1,rocthcnc 13.000 ]90()
r richlon1cthene 4.000 150
\'in\'l Chloride '6 2.9
,-,,,._.,,
1 To~;r Air Pollutant Pro~eduies, l;1rns,io11 Raic, lleyuj,in_g ,, l',·,mil I 'i.--\ ~-("',\(" ~() 1)711
ui;.:m'. nucrogrJn1; per cubic mete•
53 S.J.O
--f.2 52.0
()08 0.0
.--\nJI) tic~l rcrnh, pro, ideJ in pMI rcr billion bv , olumc (ppb,·l JnJ comencd I<> ui;"n1' bv the follo,"ng e,pre;,io11
,u,mpmmd nwlc-rnlu1· w,·1i,:ht ,-r.•,t1lt 111/'l'h,·i >'."' lrH1,1,m1 (!J Jj i..11 25"("1
lh/yr
0.02
0.59
0.98
0.12
3.63
2.34
l.-l5
().(J3
~,
ATTAClli\lENT F
Summary or lnfluc-nl and Effluent Air Results Since CRS St:1rt Up
GE Lighting Systems Annual Performance i\loniloring
East Flat Roek, North Carolina
,·:~_·:-: ,· :io12J1iooo•:F7 ~ __ -,;;-·--· -·:: ·:~--• 3/14/2001-• ' '·: --i -~-. >·~-•::'.t" .. "<'. i" :--. i;/i,12001 . .. ., . , .
Influent Effluent Influent l•:flluent Influent Erfluent
ug/m ·' lh/yr ug/111 J lh/~-r ui.:/m ' lh/yr UJ!/111 ' lhf)T ug/m ' lh/yr ug/rn ·' lhf)T
10 0.28 ND (.64) 0.02 I I 0.03 3.5 0.10 9.9 0.28 1.8 0.05
87 0.24 ND{.%) 0.03 5.3 0.15 IS 0.50 96 0.27 8.7 ()_2--t
25 0 70 ND (.80) 0.02 ND(.801 0.02 .72 J 0.02 37 I .03 20 0.56
NA NA NA NA NIJ(. 78 f 0.02 3.9 0.11 Ni\ Nt\ NA NA
390 10 88 ND(.78) 0.02 777 2.17 291 S.12 550 15.3-l 383 10.68
3100 86.47 ND(l.31 0.0.J 671 18 72 1330 37.10 2330 65.00 431 12.02
216 6.03 ND(l I) 0.03 49 1.37 [");; -U2 206 5.75 X0.8 2.25
3.6 1)10 6.3 018 1.2 0.03 7 I ()_/() S.6 0.2 ➔ 9.6 ()_')7
:'-:;::. z:C. -~"".-e-9/25/2002 .. :~:;" ~,._._ ::::•:,' . ~•. '.:. ),_-·; : 3/14/2003'0. .,...-;_~-. ' . 4 ·. 919/2003 ~.:.t:L,:_·· .. . ., ii"• .-. ~:--·~ ~.o.
Influent Effluent I nfluenl Eflluent Influent [ffluenl
ug/m J lb/yr ug/m ' lbl)T ug/m ' lh/yr ug/m ' lh/yr ug/m J lh/yr ug/m ·' lh/yr
4.8 ()_ 13 0.41 0 01 4.1 0.11 I 0.03 3.5 0.10 ND (0.64) 0.02
IS 0.50 22 0.61 8.7 0.24 2.2 0 06 8.3 0.23 12 0.33
47.7 1.33 -19.7 1.39 I 5 O.--t2 .j 0 II 16 0.45 IS 0.50
6.3 0 18 5.1 0.14 ND {0.79) 0.02 ND (0.79) 0.02 2.9 0.08 3.9 0.11
295 8.23 249 6.95 176 4.91 67.9 1.89 180 5 02 272 7.59
1660 46.31 9.4 0.26 1340 37.38 1.9 0.0.'i 1510 42.12 2.6 0.07
178 .J 97 ND(l " 0.03 146 4.07 8 022 145 4.04 16 0.45
9.6 0.27 II 0.11 8.6 0.2--t 7.6 0.1 1 7.7 0_1 I 7.9 0.22
-.. -.: 9/30/2005 .I:-: ·_·: ... ·. -. ' ---'f .. : -·--9/2112006 . ,}--'. -_. ', J/1912007 · --~:~ _.· ,,-' . C
lnfluenl Effluent Influent Eflluenl Influent Effluenl
ug/m ' lh/yr ug/m J lhl)T ug/m ·' lhl)T ug/m ·' lh/~T ug/m ' lb/yr ug/111 J lh/yr
3.8 0.11 ND(5.I) 0 1-l 2.6 0.07 0.51 0.01 112 3.12 2.8 0.08
20 0.56 19 0.53 15.9 0..14 6 0.17 2.J 007 2.J 0.07
30 O.S.J 28 0.78 23.5 0.66 II S 0.33 2.(, 0.07 2.6 0.07
7.1 0.20 5.9 0. 16 4.5 O. l 3 17 0.05 2.2 0.06 2.2 ().()6
166 4.63 161 4_.:.19 126 3.51 .JC) 2 1.3 7 183 5.1 2.--l 0.07
2120 59.14 41 I 14 774 21.59 l~.2 (1.51 14921 416 3.0 0.08
42 I 17 127 3.5•1 32.6 0.91 35.2 0.98 1494 .JI 7 16.J (j_,16
ND(4_1) 0.11 ND (4. I) 0 II ND ( 1.6) 0.0-l ;\'I) (0.2) ()01 1.9 0.05 1.IJ 0.05
-, ~-,._ .... ·~-~4;:-+-3121noo9 'f_p!". ,: -. ., -~.,
Influent Effluent
ug/m ·' lh/yr ug/m ' lh/yr
3.8 0.11 17 0.47
12 O 33 ! 2 0.33
12 0.33 '3 0.36
<2 0.06 <1.8 0.05
38 1.06 H 1.23
1100 30.68 l 100 30.68
86 2.40 100 2.79
< 1.J 0.04 < 1.2 0.03
In post ~006 results. HOl.ll inJ1<:,He< J11,1l:1e, not detected Jbove the •~roning limn. the ,\1DL i; ''"""' instead and \\a< u;.ed IO wkulJle the r.,k in lb -~r
G.-\09035b1.--\ TT F_Jir sumnury ,lsx 1 of 1
.•.' : >' 10/181200!-'-; .". ·: '· . . . . 2/imioi, ~ .-. .. . .. . . .
Influent Effluent Influent Effluent
112/111 ·' lb/yr ug/111 ·' lh/yr ug/m ' lh/yr ui/111 ' lh/yr
IS 0.05 •-1.5 0.13 ' O.OS ND (0.6-l) 0.02
12 0.33 IS O..t2 1)_2 0.26 0.97 0.03
20 0.56 35 0.9S 19 0.53 ND ((UiO) 0.02
I.➔ 0.04 5.1 0 [.j 3.8 0.11 ND (0.79) 0.02
176 491 2XO 7.81 203 5.66 7.5 0 21
8.:iS 23.93 731 20.39 1270 35.-l3 19 0.05
10,1 2.90 168 4.69 12! 3.38 ND ( 1.1) ()_()3
4 6 0.13 0.87 0.02 7_9 ()_II 7.9 0.2)
,;' :-. 11'312/2004 · .JY· : . ., --.. -~;;-: °" _·:'5/l9noo..i·<"/. " ; .. ' . -••· '-·_:7 -~', ~ ~--.
Influent Erfluenl Influent Effluent
ug/m ' lh/~T ug/111 ·' lh/~-r ug/111 ' lh/~T ug/m ·' lb/yr
3.1 0.09 ND(51) I 42 0.86 0.02 NIJ(O.Ml 0.02
13 0.36 689 19.22 1.3 0.04 2.4 0.07
22 0 61 \390 38.77 ' ' . ' (!.(}(, 3.2 0.09
2.7 0.08 ND(63) I. 76 (1 . .59 0.02 0.63 0.02
127 3.54 11600 32.i.58 27 ()_75 35 0.98
1630 45.-17. 2--l8 6.92 271 7.56 ND ( 1.41 0.04
II I 3.10 1700 47.42 31 0.86 4.0 0 II
.JI 0 II 383 10.68 o_cr 0.03 1.0 0.03
."' .;·.,: -·: :.;., -. y9/19/2007 -,, . . . "* . -: J/28121108 ,. . '. --.,-:-, .. ·'_:··. ... '
Influent Effluent Influent Effluent
ug/m ' lhl)T ug/111 ' lb/yr· ug/m ' lh/yr ug/111 ' lh/~T
1.8 0.05 ti.JO 0.01 --t.9 J 0.1--t IA o.o,,
12.9 0.36 12.1 0.3--l 20 0.56 2.7 0.08
15.9 0 4.J O.J9 0 ()] 29 O.SI 3.5 0.10
11.-IJ 0.01 2.5 0.07 S.2 0.23 O.--t6 J (JOI
()4_-t 2.63 O.J6 0.01 120 3.36 '' ()_3,1
I ISO 32.9 S34 r, -.l.J 2.800 78.3 260 7.3
231 6.--1-5 3 1.4 1)88 240 6.71 27.0 0.75
O.J-f 0.01 /_(l 0.05 .:u 0.15 0.30 J 0 01