NCD079044426_19920330_General Electric Co. Shepherd Farm_SERB C_Response from GE for Information Inquiry-OCR

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
r;r,:.<::tiE!':'lHU f'f1HH
B.ESf'OMSF": fo'HOr1 CE :run
l H Fnm1n-i: ·, nn l M(JU il• V
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-1
I
I
I
g
D
0
u
I
.. ' '
3/30/92
Pat,
Enclosed is part of the response from GE for the 104(e) information
inquiry sent to them two years ago by the Region. F.Y.I.
It has some information on other disposal sites in area,, used by GE.
Debbie V-W
r*
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
n
H
I
I
I
I
I ,~
REQUEST 15.
/
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
D
u
I
I
I
I
104(e) Question #15
Answerer: Lee A. Humphrey
Michael J. Bush
Shepherd Farm
( b) Our records reveal the Gene Shepherd of Shepherd garbage service was our trash hauler from 1955 to 1962 and 1965 to 1970. This disposal site was used by Mr. Shepherd during 1956-1962 and 1965-1970.
c,d,e See attached survey of GE hazardous waste disposal practices, conversation with Mr. Gene Shepherd, and groundwater sampling data.
( f) GELS i dent i fi ed residents adjacent to the Shepherd property with actual and potential contamination in the wells. Without admitting any liability, GELS responded by supplying those residents with bottled water and by extending City water lines into the area.
(g) Investigations by the North Carolina Department of Environment, Hea 1th, and Natural Resources revealed groundwater and soil contamination in the area. GELS then initiated a groundwater study of the area.
II. Seldon Clark Property
Interview with Mr. Seldon Clark and conversations with Fate Jones and Dan A. Yarborough revealed that the Seldon Clark property, at the intersection of US 176 and Tabor Road, was used as a fill area for construction rubble from the Site.
III. Western North Carolina Fairgrounds
Conversations with Dan A. Yarborough, Charlie Henderson, and Fate Jones revealed that the following activities involving GELS occurred:
2.
GELS had several company picnics at the fairgrounds, however, all material brought to the fairgrounds was removed at the end of the picnic.
GELS had a sa 1 e of office equipment at the fairgrounds in 1980. This could account for the reports of GE trucks carrying items to the fairgrounds.
I
I
104(e) Question #15 (continued) I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
ft
B
I
IV.
V.
VI.
I VII.
I
I
I
I
I
3. GELS donated materials and fuel to train local fire departments. This training was conducted at the fairgrounds. We have no other knowledge of any materials being taken to the
fairgrounds.
Grandview Memorial Gardens
We have no knowledge of any GELS waste being disposed of at this site.
Jesse Staton Farm
Conversations with Jesse Staton, fork truck garage work leader at GELS
and Dan A. Yarborough, indicate that only construction rubble was
landfilled at the farm site.
Henderson County Landfill
(b)
(c)
(d)
( e)
1970-1979
(i) capacitors; (ii) paint sludge in barrels; (iii) epoxy gunk; (iv) Al and Fe slurry from dust collectors; (v) water based acrylic paint cans; (vi) heavy petroleum grease; (vii) varnish residues; (viii) buffing waste; (ix) wire drawing lubricant; and (x) phenolic plastic residue.
landfill
(i) 5000-15000 per year until 1976; (ii) 50-150 level per year to 1973; (iii) 4000 lbs/wk (last four years); (iv) 1-10 per week; (v) 2 barrels per week; (vi) 4-10 barrels/year; (vii) 200-1000 lbs/week; (ix) 300-500 gallons/year; and (x) 1000 lbs/ week.
Fains Dump
(b}
(c)
(d)
(e)
1969-1970
miscellaneous plant waste including (pail sludge, small capacitors, buffing waste, epoxy compounds, die cast mold release, paint cans (acrylic hydrocarbon paint), phenolic plastic residue. landfill
estimates for -paint sludge 50-150 barrels epoxy compounds -SO barrels phenolic plastic residue -250 lbs/week
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
•
I
104(e) Question #15 (continued)
VIII. The following are licensed disposal sites where GELS sent waste as
indicated on hazardous waste manifests:
1. Resource Industries of Alabama
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
Chem-Dyne Corporation
South Carolina SCA (GSX) Service -Pinewood, SC Chemical Waste Management -Emmelle, AL ABCO Industries -Roebuck, SC
GE Service Shop -Charlotte, NC
E.I. DuPont DeMemours and Company -Deepwater, NJ ENSCO -El Dorado, AR
Heritage Environmental Services -Charlotte, NC Heritage Environmental Services Indianapolis, IN Trade Waste Incineration (CWM) -Sauget, IL CWM -Chemical Services -Millington, TN
u
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
D
B
I
I
I
I
Documents Consulted for Response to #15
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
D
0
&EPA Notification of Hazardous Waste Site Un1t&d Sta1e1
Environmental Pro1t• Agency
A
This initial notification information is
required by Sec11on 1 OJ(c) of the Compre-
hensive Environmental Response. Compen-
sation. and Liability Act of 1980 and must
be maded by June 9. 1981.
Person Required to Notify:
Enter the name and address of the person ·
or organization required to notify.
Please type or print in ink. If you need
add,t1onal space. use separate sheets of
paper. Indicate the letter of the itsm
which applies.
WHhtngton DC 204
EPA IDENTIFICATIOO NO.
NC0079044426
Name C-eoeraJ EJectric CaJ;>aoy, Tighting Systems Dept
Spartanburg Highway
Hendersonville Stale NC z,. c ... 28739
B Site Location:
Name al S,to Henderson Counrr..§_anitary Landfill Enter the common name !if known) and
actual location of the site.
Street Stoney l-b.mtain ~-----·-··------
c,,, Hendersonville County Henderson S1a1e NC Z,pCode 28739
C Person to Contact:
lhtlt Mgr.,. q., .. li ty Ass11onc-Enter the name. title (if applicable). and
business telephone number of the person
to contact regarding information
submitted on this form.
_Ps_o,_•~(~7~04--,_) 693-2578
D Dates of Waste Handling:
Enter the years that you estimate waste
treatment. storage. or disposal began and
ended at the site.
19"/Q
E Waste Type: Choose the option you prefer to complete
Option I: Select general waste types and source categories. If
you do not know the general waste types or sources. you are
encouraged to describe the site in Item t-Oescr1pt1on of Site.
General Type of Wasta:
Place an X in the appropriate
boxes. The categories listed
0Yerlap. Check each applicable
category.
1. 0 Organics
2. C"' lnorganics
J, C Solvents
4. -Pesticides
5. Heavy metals
6. C Acids
7, Bases
8, r PCBs
9, C Mixed Municipal Waste
10. Unknown
11 JC: Other !Spec,fy)
Eai.nt
Form .4,pprov•d
0~18 \o. 2000-(>t lS
Source of Waste:
Place an X 1n the appropriate
bo)(es.
l C M1n1ng
2. 0 Construction
3. 0 Textiles
4. L...: Fertilizer
5. Paµer, Pr1nt1ng
6 C Leath1ir Tanning
7 lron,·S1eel Foundry
8 Chemical, General
9 Pla11ng:Pol1sn1ng
10. ·-Military/ Ammunition
11 Electrical Conductcrs
12 Transformers
13. ~ Util,ty Comi,:::an1es
14. --Sanitary/Refuse
15 :---Pho1of1n1sn
16 Q Lab1 Hospital
17. CJ Unkno'-:"n
18 XJ Other !Spec,fy)
SIC 3646
To (Year) 197.8 .. -------------
Option 2: Th,s option is aYailable to persons familiar with
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) Section 3
regula11ons (40 CFR Part 261).
Specific Type of Waste:
EPA has assigned a four-digit number to each hazaroous ,.,
listed 1n the regulations under Section 3001 of ACRA. En1e
appropriate four-digit number in the boxes provided. A cop
the 11st of hazardous wastes and codes can be obtained by
contacting the EPA Region serving the State in which the s
located.
--
-------j
i
>--------
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
0
D
F
H
Notification of Hazardous Waste Site
Wasta Quantity:
Place an X in the appropriate boxes to
indicate the facllity types found at the site.
In the "total facility waste amount" space
give the estimated combined quantity
(volume) of hazardous wastes at the site
using cub,c feet or gallons.
In the "total facility area" space. give 1he
estimated area size which the fac,1tt1es
occupy using square feet or acres.
Side Two
Facility Type
1. 0 Piles
2. 0 Land Treatment
3. IXI Landfill
4. 0 Tanks
5. 0 lmpoundment
6. 0 Underground ln1ection
7. 0 Drums. Above Ground
8. l!I Drums, Below Ground
9 0 Other (Specify)
Known, Suspected or Likely Releases to the Environment:
Place an X in the. appropriate boxes to indicate any known, suspected.
or likely releases of wastes to the environment.
Total Facility Waite Amount
cul:HC feet
,,11on1 42 • 190
Total Facility Area
acres 35
D Known XJ Suspected D Likely w None
Note: hems Hand I are optional. Completing these items will assist EPA and State and local governments in locating and assessinf
hazardous waste sites. Although comple11ng the ttems 1s not required. you are encouraged to do so.
Sketch Map of Site Location: (Optional)
Sketch a map showing streets. highways.
routes or other prominent landmarks near
the site. Place an X on the map to indicate
the site location. Draw an arrow show,ng
the direction north. You may substitute a
publishing map showing the site loca11on
Description of Site: (Opt,onall
Describe the history and present
cond111ons of the site. G,ve directions 10
the site and describe any nearby wells.
springs. lakes. or housing. Include such
,nforma11on as how waste was disposed
and where the waste came from. Pro\11de
any other 1nformat1on or comments wh1cn
may help describe the s11e cond1t1ons
J Signature and Title:
The person or authorized representati\le
(such as plant managers. superintendents.
trustees or attorneys) of persons required
to notify must sign the form and pro\11de a
mailing address {if different than address
in item A). For other persons providing
notification. the signature is opuonaL
Check the bo,.es which best describe the
relationship to the site of the person .. ~ . . ... , ,, ..
Na~~ Bernd Tinder -G E C-0
s,, • ., Spartanbur._,_g,.__,Hi-=·,,,ghwa==v,_ __________ _
c,., Hendersonville Sutt N; Z,oCode 28739
0 Owner. Prest
D Owner. Past
0 Transporter
D Qpera1or, Presen1
D Operator. Past
0 Other
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
&EPA Notification of Hazardous Waste Site United S1etu
Environmen1al Prote1 Agency
A
This initial notification 1nformat1on 1s
required by Section 103(c) of the Compre•
hensive Environmental Response. Compen-
sation. and Liability Act of 1980 and must
be ma,led by Juno 9, 1981.
Person Required to Notify:
Enter the name and address of the person
or organization requlfed to notify.
Pleaae type or print rn ink. If you need
add1t1onat space, use separate sheets of
paper. Indicate the letter of the item
which applies.
Washington DC 204
EPA IDENI'IFICATIOO 00.
NCD079044426
Name C,=meral Elect:cic Co u gbting Systems Dept,
s .... , Spartanburg Highway
Hendersonville Stat• NC Z,oCode 28739
B Site Location: Chem-Dyne Cot129.rat_ion (Chem-Way Descruto & Carola-
1426 fuxntain Stteet__·
Enter the common name (if known) and
actual location of the site.
C Person to Contact:
Name of S,1e
Street
c,,'I Kerners:vi J 1 e Counrv S1a1e NC Zip Code 2 7284
Enter the name. title (if applicable). and
business telephone number of the person
to contact regarding information
submitted on this form.
Nar'T'@ (last. r::,rs1 and T,11~1t.inder, .Bernd -~.JJnit Mgr• J •. ~lity Assuranc
pSono [phone]
D Dates of Waste Handling:
Enter the years that you estimate waste
treatment. storage, or disposal began and
ended at the site.
From 1Y@an __J.lc,9CJ.7,;;8c__ _ __.cT:.o fYrnl 1978 -·--------------
E Waste Type: Choose the option you prefer to complete
Option I: Select general waste types and source categories. If
you do not know the general waste types or sources. you are
encouraged to describe the site in Item I-0escnpt1on of Site.
General Type of Waste:
Place an X in the appropriate
boxes. The categories listed
overlap. Check each applicable
category.
1. 0 Organics
2. D lnorgan1cs
3. D Solvents
4. 0 Pesticides
5. ~ Heavy metals
6. G Acids
7. iJ Bases
8. 0 PCBs
9. 0 Mi)(ed Municipal waste
10. 0 Unknown
11. 0 Other (Spec,fy)
Form .",,pproved
0'.1-tB No. 2000-01.38
EPA Form 8900·1
Source of Waste:
Place an X in the appropriate
boxes.
1.
2
3.
4.
G
::J
0
c-
Mining
Construction
Textiles
Fertilizer
5. --Paper.·Pr.-,11ng
6. '· Lea:her T~nr rg
7 !ran; Steel i-:o 1ndry
8 Chemical. General
9 Plating, Polishing
10 . ., Military, Ammun1t1on
11 Electrical Conductors
12 Transformers
13 Utility Companies
14. Sanitary/Refuse
1 5. ,:.... Pho1of(n1sh
1 6. 0 Lab; Hospital
17. 0 Unknown
18. D OtMr iSpec,fyl
Option 2: This option is available to persons familiar with
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRAI Section :
regulauons (40 CFR Part 261).
Specific Type of Waste:
EPA has assigned a four-digit number to each hazardous
l1s1ed 1n the regulations under Section 3001 al RCRA E~t•
appropriate four-digit number in the boxes provided A cot:
the 11st of hazardous wastes and codes can be obtained by
contacting the EPA Region serving the State in wn,cn :ne
located.
0001 F-=-= ,-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
F
G
Notification of Hazardous Waste Site
Wa.te Quantity:
Place an X in the appropriate boxes to
indicate the facility types found at the·s11e.
In the "total facility waste amount°' space
give the estimated combined Quantity
(volume) of hazardous wastes at the site
using cubic feet or gallons.
In the "total facility area" space. give the
estimated area size which the facll1t1es
occupy using square feet or acres.
Side Two
Facility Type , D Piles
2. D Land Treatment
3. D Landfill
4. D Tanks
5. D lmpoundment
6. D Underground lniection
7. D Drums, Above Ground
8. D Drums, Below Ground
Total Facility Waite Amount
cubic feet
gallons 3410
Total Facility Area
9. il! Other (Specify) Incinerator
Known, Suspected or Likely Releases to the Environment:
Place an X in the appropriate boxes to indicate any known, suspected.
or likely releases of wastes to the environment.
D Known JO Suspected D Likely O None
Note: Items Hand I are optional. Completing these ,terns will assist EPA and State and local governments in locating and assess1n~
hazardous waste sites. Although completing the 1tems_1s not required, you are encouraged t0 do so.
H Sketch Map of Site Location: (Optional)
Sketch a map showing streets, highways.
routes or other promrnent landmarks near
the site. Place an X on the map to indicate
the sue location. Draw an arrow show,ng
1he direction north. You may substitute a
publishing map showing the site locat1on.
Description of Site: (Opt,onall
Oescrilie the history and present
cond111ons of the s11e. Give d1rect1ons to
!he s11e and describe any nearby wells.
springs. lakes. or housing. Include such
,nformat1on as how waste was disposed
and where the waste came from Provide
any other 1nforma1,on or comments wh,cri
may rielp describe the site cond111ons
Incineration facility. Has since been closed down,
cleaned up and is being IIOl1itored.
I J Signature and Title:
The person or authorized represen1a11ve '°"""'P Bernd Linder -G. E. Cb.
(such as plant managers. superintendents.
I trustees or attorneys) of persons reciuired
to notify must sign the form and provide a S11 P~• Spartanburg Highway
mailing address (if different than address ~-~--~------------
I
in item A). For other persons prov1d1ng C,,.,. S111e NC notification, the signature ,s optional.
Check the boxes which best describe 1ne .._f) ~ .
relationship to the site of the person \~
reouired to notifv. If vou are not reouired 5~•~'-"~'~"•~•---"--'---'-''-----'----....::::.._
z,. coo. 28739
0 Owner. Prese
0 Owner, Past
D Transporter
0 Operator. Present
□ Operator. Past
0 Other
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
SURVEY OF GE HAZARDOUS WASTE DISPOSAL PRACTICES
The survey was conducted In 1979. It was completed by the-·manager
of the Reclamation,Department whom has since retired. This is the
most comprehensive compilation which exists for the facility. The
dates and quantities were based on his personal estimates.
(~ ~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
t
I
I
I
I
I
I
SURVEY OF GE IIAZ!\RDOUS \VASTt JJ1:,l-'u:,.u.1., r-1t1H .. 1H.,i:...:>
Under authoril:,-of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), the
1~11\'i!·onmcntal Prot.::ction Agency h:is proposed regulations to control the future
.~po::s:-tl of h:izardo:is wastes (43FR5S946, December 18, ln78). There is also grnw~
ing p~ll,\ic and legisl:lti\·e ccnc.;ern about the current impact of past waste disposal
· pra::tii:cs, an iss_ue not covered by RCRA.
The purpose of this survey is to estimate the impact upon GE facilities of the
pro1rnsed :-ci;ulation;; :ind of public concern with the problems created by hazardous
wast1~s. in aba.ndoned landfills.
Please complete the survey form based upon current knowledge within your
cornponer.t of bn:h past and present waste dispcsal practices. Where such knowledge
is not currently available, _do not attempt to reconstruct i.t from related information·,
such as data on past plant prochlction. Do not solicit information from sources o,<tside
the Company.
I. :!DENTIFICATION
A.
B.
C.
Name of component -----'------------------~ Lighting Systems Department
Address
GE organizational Affiliation (where appropriate)
Sector
Group
T'\,,: •• ......... ·n:av r. ,
Department _____________________________ _
Other
Name, title, and cli:ll comm of key individual knowledgeable about waste
disposal at your location:
E. F. Stenstrom, Manager -Reclamation 8-282-2502
Responsibility from 1969 to present date. No factual knowledge
prior to that_date or any known records other than name of contractor
to haul away plant Haste,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
r
I
I
I'
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
lJ. WASTE SUH.Vi-.\
A. Has :i survey e·,er been made to determine the types and
quantities of wac;tes generated at your site, their points of
origin, and the methods used for their disposal?
B. If your answer to A is "Yes", please
1. Give date of survey
2. Give name of initiating organization (if non-GE)
3. Attach survey results.
NO
III. HAZARDOUS WASTES
Please review the Appendix, which lists, by broad categories, the types of
wastes considered by EPA as hazardous.
A.
B.
c.
Has your plant ever generated or disposed of wastes
such as those in Appendix? YES
If your answer to A is "No", you have completed this questionnaire.
If your answer to A is "Yes", please fill out Tables 1 and/or 2 as
applicable.
• Use Table 1 to list all facilities (e.g. landfills, lagoons, incin-
erators) on your plant site that contain or that have been used
to ~:sp0so_ -•, ~-y nt f.}.o t-,, ..... os of ....... c:to 1:c•orl in +l'\C> Anl'"'!o-..-1,·~
\;..,_• -V ""'•i ..,,. '-•''-' ._.) I:'-•''--..,. _.,._1, __ -•• ., .• ..., -r'J! ...,;,,.... •••
• Use Table 2 to list sites not on GE property that have been used
for the disposal of wastes from your plant site.
-,--

-
.. --Loc:1tie Hendersonville, N. C.
Type• of cont:1lnment
o:: dis os:11 facilltv
15 million gallon waste pond
Dry pond
Lime Treatment · .· 1
TABLE 1
WASTE CONTAlNMENT AND DISPOSAL PRACTICES
ON GE PHOPERTY
Dates when used
1969 -1/77
1/77 -5/79
T es nnd n roximnte nntitles or waste dis os'!c.! c,C •
.4 to 1.3 million gallons per day -waste process waters.
spent nitric, phosphoric and sulfuric acid, process equaliz,
and adjust pH before going into Bat Fork Creek. Bottom of
pond will have trace elemen~s of copper, nickel, phosphorus
Zinc, iron and chroniurn; also powdered carbon
Pumped bottom of 15 million gallon pond into elevated dry
pond -mixed with coag~late. Estimated 2000 to 5000 cubic
yards removed from pond bottom. Clear water drained back
into large pond.
All high strength waste streams processed through lime
treatment and filter, estimated 40,000 gallons per day.
Clear water flows back to 15 million gallon pond as before.
Approximateiy 150 pou_nds per day (dry weight) of lime
phosphated sludge applied to "permitted" land application
_.on General Electric g:,:ass plots.
• Type of containment or disposal facility includes c. g. landfill, lagoon, . inci;:J.c:-ator • '
•• Be as specific as possible, but at the very least use the general alph:1 nume::-ic designation from
Loc:i.tion 1dersonville, N; C. -----------------------
TADLE 2
WASTE DISPOSAL PHACTICES
OFF GE PHOPEHTY
Type* or N:i.me :ind location or
oIT-site dis oscr dis osal faclllt D:i.tes when used
Types nnd approximate qunntlties
of waste dis osed of **
Henderson County Dump Landfill 1970-1976
Hen_derson County Dump Landfill .1970-6/78 (
'
Henderson County Dump Landfill 6/78-5/79
• Typo of disposal facility includes c, g. landfiU, lagoon, incinerator,
'. I , 1)
. 'I. _l) ' ' '· /:' . '
ii 2)
I.
'.JJ,-·
3)
::,··
4)
,_(;t:
5) \ '
6)
I -,,-., \
,, \r. 7 J
8)
' ·. 9)
Polychlorinated biphenyls capacitors
(articles) 3 p6unds and under -estim
5000_ to 15000 per year.
' Gunk ·barrels with acrylic paint sludge
from water wash paint booths 50 to 150
barrels a year up to around 1971.
' Epoxy gunk barrels -approximately 50
per year. 1
Aluminum~steel slurry from dust collec
esimated 4000 paunds per week -last f
years.
Heavy petroleum greases and other gunk
barrels,, estimated 2 bar=els per week.
5 gallon· containers of water base acry
paint -partial to full, one to ten pc
~eek over the last five years.
varnish residue from cleaning varnish
ballast treat system, 4 to 10 barrels
year.
Aluminum, cotton, grit from buffing w,
200 to 1000 pounds per ,,eek.
300 to 500 gallons per year'of copper
contaminated dra,,ing lu:>ricant from ti
wire mi·ll.
Phenolic: !;lashing and floor sweepings
pounds to 1000 pounds pe,: week.
No liquids or hydrocarbons to county dump
.,. ,,,., 0 • snr,r,(ic ns nosslhl~. h11t nt. the vc~v lc:i.st use the gcnc;-al ul~ha numeric ci~signa::lon
~ -Compc -1t .. --.. -.. ... Loc:ition Hendersonville, N. C.
Name :ind location of
oU-site dis oser
Fain's Dump -approximately five
miles north of Hendersonville
near US 25
Hendersonville Waste Treatment
I I
I
TADLE 2
WASTE DISPOSAL PRACTICES
OFF GE Pf\OPEHTY
Type• of
dis osnl fac!llt
Private landfill
Sanitary waste
treatment system
Dntes when used
1969-1970
No records were kept
of this activity -
all figures ar,e best
estimates
1969,. 5/79
• Type of disposal facility includes c, g, landfill, lagoon, incinc:-ator.
Types nnd npproximate quantities
of waste dis oscd of ••
Contract wast~ disposal service by Gene
Shepherd. 1
1) Total plant waste including
A) Estimated 50-150 barrels paint slu
1 uB),, Polychlorinated biphenyls · article
(small capacitors)
C) Buffing·waste -cotton, aluminum,
and grit
D)
,,. E)
F)
G)
Epoxy compounds -estimated 50 bar
Die cast mold release -hydroc~rbo
Miscellaneous· one and five gallon
paint can~ partial to full with
acrylic hydrocarbon paint
Phenolic residue from deflashing a
floo'r sweeping -estimated 250 poc
per week
20,000 to' 30,000. gallons per day typical
sanitary -.,aste
' 20,000 to 30,000 gallons per day -600 par
per million biochemical oxygen demand watE
proc~ss solution -no toxic rnetals, all we
processed through oil and water separator
before sent.
Loc:ition Hendersonville, .N. C.
Name and iocation o!
off-site disooscr
Resource Industries of Alabama
P. O. Box 1200
Livingston, Alabama 34570
Chem-Dyne Corporation
1426 ~ountain Street
Kernersville, N. C. 27284
TABLE 2
WASTE DISPOSAL PRACTICES
OFF GE PROPERTY
Type• o! Types and approximate quantities
dis osal facilit Dates when used o! waste dis osed of ••
Fedc»·al registered
landfill for
Polychlorinated
biphenyls
9711/78 -,./. 94 drums of Pplychlorinated biphenyl capac
Registered,· incinerator 12/14/78 ._,\ .·.62 drums of hydrocarbons
South Carolina SCA Service
Rt. 1, P. o. Box 55
Pinewood, s. C. 29125
'Registered landfill
'
12/28/78 I ;. 25 drums of Non-Polychlorinated bi phenyl
capacitors
I
i
'.
\J \ \\\'-"
• Type of clisposnl facility includes c, g. landfill, lagoon, incinerator.
•• n,., ~~ · sn,.,rific ns noss!blc, but at the very least use the general alpha numeric designation .
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
RECEIVED
flOV 1 s 19&9
G.E. LIGHTING SYSTEMS
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
Asheville Regional Office
James C. Martin, Governor
William W. Cobey, Jr., Secretary
Hr. Grover Nicholson
Superfund Section
Post Office Box 27687
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
GROUNDWATER SECTION
November 2, 1989
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687
Dear Hr, Nicholson:
Subject: Reports of Buried Druas
Henderson County, North Carolina
Ann B. Orr
Regional Manager
On the morning of October 31, 1989, Hrs. Evelyn Nichols called this office to report that Hrs. ·Betty Edwards had told her she remembered that trucks from General Electric Company (GE) had, in the past, carried barrels of unknown contents to the old fairgrounds next to the armory in Henderson County, and buried them on that property in large holes. Hrs. Nichols indicated that GE used to have picnics on that property but she did not know if they ever owned the site.
Hrs. Nichols is particularly concerned about the former fairground p:-operty as f.:he said ttlc cou.nty has purchased ic and intends to construct a school there.
While she was giving me this information, she said she also remembered Hr. Gene Shepherd (Shepherd's Garbage Service) carrying trash that may ha"e come from GE and may have included barrels, to an area near Grandvie'-' Memorial Gardens in the Tracy Grove Community in Henderson County.
I-told Hrs. Nichols that I would contact the appropriate officials to handle this matter, and I am referring it to you. As the information she passed on to me is fairly sketchy, I suggest you contact her for further details. Hrs. Nichols' telephone number is 704-693-3370. Hrs. Edward's telephone number is 704-692-9594.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
•
Hr. Grover Nicholson
November 2, 1989
Page 2
Thank you for your assistance. If you have any questions, do not hesitate
to contact me or Don Link at 704-251-6208.
DHAE/gc
cc: Robert Horris
Evelyn Nichols
Sincerely,
t /'.· .. ,, .· tr/ I
-1·· ')/,,(l{J l·.i? /·A / 1·· 1 //l ~ '--'-L ~ ... ,....{. ....,. ,-' . /1 Diane H. A. Eskenasy, J?,;' G.
Hydrogeological Technician
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
LAW ENOINEERINO
geotocMicaJ. environmental & constrvctiorl rna1enaJs consultants
1100 THOUSAND OAKS BLVD.
GOLDEN OAKS BUSINESS PARK
GREENVILLE, SOUTH CAROUNA 29607
~ [phone] "
September 28, 1989
North Carolina Department of Environment
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Environmental Management
Ground Water Section
59 Woodfin Place
Asheville, North Carolina 28801
Attention:
Subject:
Ms. Diane M. A. Eskenasy, P.G.
Correction to Results of Chemical Analysis
of Ground-Water Samples
Shepherd Property Project
East Flat Rock, North Carolina
Law Engineering Job Number GVE-2231
Dear Ms. Eskenasy:
For your edification, a correction to the subject data has been made
and is noted herein. I have enclosed a copy of the corrected
laboratory analytical results from residential water supply well WW-
11. This information replaces data which previously sent to you in
July, 1989. This well, designated WW-11, is the property of Mr.
Hill of East Flat Rock, North Carolina and corresponds to his
rental property on Oak Grove Road (also Tahor Road). Please discard
the previous data indicating "non detection" of organic halocarbon
contamination in the well water. ·
Please notify us if we can be of assistance.
/jgw.b
cc: ATTN: Michael Bush
General Electric
Respectfully yours,
L~z?GINE~No/ _
{ 1-n v1 (Vo t ( ( i1 vl1-'1'1 ,-,:,_----,
Thomas L. Lammons
Environmental Services Manager
I:___ __________ _
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Region IV, USEPA
345 Cortland Street
Atlanta, Georgia 30365
July 31, 1989
LAW ENQINEERINQ
oeotechnical. environmental & oonstn.iciiorl mater1als oonsuttants
1100 THOUSAND OAKS BLVD.
GOLDEN OAKS BUSINESS PARK
GREENVILLE, SOUTH CAROLINA 29607
[phone]
Attention: Mr. Robert Morris
Subject: Chemical Analysis of Ground-Water Samples
for Shepherd Property Project
East Flat Rock, North Carolina
Law Engineering Job Number GVE-2231
Dear Mr. Morris:
Pursuant to the request of the General Electric Lighting System
Department, Hendersonville, North Carolina, we are forwarding the
results of chemical analysis for twelve ground-water samples
collected on June 28, 1989 in the vicinity of the E. B. Shepherd
property, Oak Grove Road, East Flat Rock, North Carolina. Attached
you will find a table which identifies each sample with the
respective property owner. Also enclosed is a copy of the
laboratory quality management plan for Law Environmental National
Laboratories.
/jgw
Attachment
cc: Michael Bush
General Electric
Yours very truly,
LAW ENGINEERING
//~~ 1 /tNt~--a
Thomas L. Lammons
Environmental Services Manager
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Conversation with Mr. Gene Shepherd and wife of Shepherd Garbage Service
(692-1394) on April 14, 1989.
I informed Mr. Shepherd of my purpose for talking with him:
l) To find out the disposal practices used on the wastes
he hauled from the GE facility.
2) To find out other information, both past and present,
that would relate to the area or GE.
l) What years did you haul for GE?
Shepherd began hauling .ihen the plant was first built in 1%5. During l?i:i
Shepherd hauled the material to the County Dump (At this time the dump 11as_not
in the present location. Mr. Shepherd stated that the County, City of
Hendersonville and others disposed of trash at the area that is no.i the City
Park.) After 1%5 the volume that Mr. Shepherd was bringing in became too
large for the landfill to handle. In lS'J6 t1r. Shepherd began bringing the
material to his property on Roper Road. He continued bringing the material to
his property until 1962. In 1962 Mr. Shepherd lost his contract to Sterr.burg
of Asheville. Sternburg hauled the trash from 1962 -1964, Mr. Shepherd did
not kno11 11here this material was tal:en. In 1964 Mr. Shepherd regained his
contract and continued to take the material to his property on Roper Road
until 1967. In 1967 the Henderson county Health Department stopped Mr.
Shepherd from burning the trash on his property. Fror:1 1967 through October
197 D ~ir. Shepherd transported the GE wastes to some land he leased north of
Hendersonville, off of Highway 25. Mr Shepherd stated that this land 11as 01-med
by Mr. Paynes ( Dur records show Fains). The area is now a junk yard. Mr.
Shepherds records show that the last date of employment of one of his
employees devoted to the GE facility was October 197 D. Mr. Shepherd did not
thin!: that he hauled any material for GE after October 1970.
2) What type of material 11as brougl1t to the Roper Road site?
Mr. Shepherd stated that it 11as mostly ,iood, paper, alr;;ost all of the solid
waste, pallets and office paper.
3) Did you bring any drums to t~e Roper Road site?
11r. Shepherd stated that he hac, but not very often. When he would recieve a
drum ( or other valuable items such as good paint, wood, and metal, some cf
the GE er:1ployees knew about it and 110uld ccme and get them before they 11ere
burned.) The GE employees would take the materials and dump the drur:1s out and
take them al so.
4) Do you remember what v1as in the drums?
Mr. Shepherd stated that it was mostly buffing compound, the mdterial was like
grit and dirt. Also he 11ould get some drums that contained "11ater that they
used to clean parts in".
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~) Could you describe this water?
It was a brown soapy water, Mr. Shepherd did not think it had an odor.
6) Did you have any other customers' trash hauled here?
No, I served some residents but that trash went elsewhere.
7) Did you haul for any dry cleaners, mec~anic/r;1achine slrops, auto body shops or other industries?
No, the only trash I brought here was GE's. Because it was a short distance, large volume and burnt well.
8) Have you sold any land that had material disposed on it?
No, I sold that area behind me for a trailer park eight years ago. But I never used it for dumping.
9) What areas/people are on city 1,ater?
The water main runs north on Roper to the trailer park road. The trailer park is on city water. Mr. Shepherd has been on city 1,ater for the last six months. Another water main runs south on Roper Road to about the creek. The Hills and thier other two houses are not on city water( the Raglands and Maybins).
10) Do you have any records of what was disposed cf l1ere?
No.
11) Do you have any other records?
Some but not many. ( For example the contract ending date was given as the last date of employment of cne of his employees.)
12) Has the State or County contacted you?
No, a woman called that rents one of the Hill's houses and talked about her 1va ter. ( Ragl ands)
I
I
I
I
I
I Station
WW-1
I WW-2
WW-3
WW-4
I WW-5
WW-6
WW-7
I WW-8
WW-9
WW-1O
WW-11
I WW-12
I
I
I
I\
I
I
I
I
I
I. D.
RESIDENTIAL GROUND-WATER SAMPLING
EAST FLAT ROCK, NORTH CAROLINA
June 28, 1989
Property Owner
Jess R. Harris
John N. Camp
Roy H. Melton
Odell Edney
Otto C. Banks
Thomas A. Dupont
N/A
Ernest H. Russell
Hill residence
Hill slaughter house
Hill Property (Raglin
renter)
Maybin Hill
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
North Carolina Department of Human Resources
Division of Health Service
Environmental Epidemiology Branch
Drinking Water Health Risk Evaluation For
Cnlorinated Solvents
LABOR/\TOIW NUMBER 'lo ft) :,7
Based on these analytical results, this ~ater is contaminated with a chlorinated
solvent. Chlorinated solvents nave Deen widely used (both industrially and in name-use
products) for many years.
One chlorinated solvent, vinyl chloride, is known to cause cancer and other adverse
l,ealth effects in humans. Many otner cnlorinated solvents nave been shown to cause
cancer in one or more species of laooratory animals. In some cases, this apparent
cancer-causing effect is relevant to human exposure to contaminated drinking water, but
in other cases, the relevance of animal studies to humans is less clear. None of these
chemicals is known to cause cancer in humans.
Some chlorinated solvents have not oeen linked to cancer. For these chemicals,
acceptable intake levels are based on other health effects, such as potential nervous
system effects, liver or kidney injury.
The U. S. Environmental Protection Agency has set maximum contaminant levels for a
number of chlorinated solvents. The maximum contaminant level is tr,e amount of a
chemical that is considered acceptaole in public drinking water supplies. The maximum
contaminant level considers adverse health effects, cost associated with removing the
chemical froi11 w·ater, end other technic2l factors. The maximum contaminant level is noc
binding for users of private supply wells, but ·is a useful guideline.
( )
Chlorinated Solvent
vinyl chloride
l,l-dichloroethylene
1,1,l-trichloroetnane
carbon tetrachloride
1,2-dichloroethane
Maximum Contaminant
Level ( ppti)
2
7
200
5
5
-f.e.+ . s
This Well (ppb)
trichloroethyle e ~
This water is a eptable for al uses due to the very low levels present.
( ) Resample in aoout ~~~ rnonth(s). (PLEASE INDICATE ON LAB SHF.ET THAT IT IS
A RESAl-'PLE AND PROVIDE PREVIOUS S~YPLE NUMBER(S).)
~ This water is signifi~antly contaminated and should not be used for drinking or
cooking. Prolonged bathing/showering should be avoided.
( ) This water is highly contaminated and should not be used for drinking, cooking, or
bathing/showering.
Comments:tlf~ /~/-dt,~io~:f;;o/~ -r-~/2 -1o ~-;<Ur~ ~,it_ ~ ~✓---u,A-1)/
0 /I<~
For further information, contact Dr. Ted Taylor, Environmental Epidemiology Branch,
[phone].
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
North Carolina Department of Human Resources
Division of Health Service
En.vironmental Epidemiology Branch
Drinking Water Health Risk Evaluation For
Chlorinated Solvents
LABORATORY NUMBER Co s o s-0
Based on these analytical results, tnis ~ater is contaminated with a chlorinated
solvent. Chlorinated solvents have been widely used (both industrially and in home-use
products) for many years.
On~ cti!orinated solvent, vinyl chloride, is known :o cause cancer and otner adverse
nealth effects in humans. Many other chlorinated solvents nave Deen st1own to cause
cancer in one or more species of laboratory animals. In some cases, this apparent
cancer-causing effect is relevant to human ex~osure to contaminated drinking water, but
in other cases, the relevance of animal studies to humans is less clear. None of these
chemicals is known to cause cancer in numans.
Some chlorinated solvents have not oeen linked to cancer. For these chemicals,
acceptable intake levels are based on other health effects, such as potential nervous
system effects, liver or kidney injury.
The U. S. Environmental Protection Agency has set maximum contaminant levels for a
number of chlorinated solvents. The maximum contaminant level is the amount of a
chemical that is considered acceptable in public drinking water supplies. The maximum
contaminant level considers adverse health effects, cost associated with removing the
chemical frcm water, and other technical factors. ~he maximum contaminant level is not
binding for users of private supply wells, but is a useful guideline.
· Maximum Contaminant
Chlorinated Solvent Level (ppb) This Well (ppb)
vinyl chloride 2·
l, l-dichloroeu.y lene 7
1,1,l-tricnloroethane 200
carbon tetrachloride 5
l, 2-dichloroethane 5
trichloroeth~e ~-,5.11 ,.-_,__l'J-'-'?..._ __ _ -t..,.,--t .... d..L,,.;; ~ -v -· r-"'
( ) This water is acceptable for all uses due to the very low levels present.
( ) Resample in about c-=ac=--== rnonth(s). (PLEASE INDICATE ON LAB SHEET THAT IT IS
A RESAWLE AND PROVIDE PREVIOUS SAMPLE NUMBER(S).)
(:/4 This water is significantly contaminated and should not be used for drinking or
cooking. Prolonged bathing/showering should be avoided.
( ) Tnis water is highly contaminat2d and should not be used for drinking, cooking, or
bathing/showering.
Comments:
For further information, contact Dr. Ted Taylor, Envirormental Epidemiology Branch,"
[phone].
OHS. Tl1)_2_\,8~88) (Revise~?/J~(lj __ ... .
·2nvironmental=E{:i'mernTology-Brarx:n---···---.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
September 5, 1989
Law Engineering, Inc.
1100 Thousand Oaks Blvd.
Greenville, SC 29607
Attention: Tom Lammons
LE Job Number: GVE-2231 (REVISED)
LENL Job Number: 12024
Subject: Chemical Analysis of Samples Received
on 6/30/89 (#89-3820-11)
Dear Mr. Lammons:
--- -- -- ---- -- ---. .
LAW ENVIRONMENTAL. INC.
112 TUMIPARJ< DRIVE
KENNESAW GEORGIA 30144-5599
404-4,1.3400
Law Environmental National Laboratories has revised its analysis
of your samples and reports the results on the following pages.
These results relate only to the contents of the samples as
submitted. This report shall not be reproduced except in full
without the approval of Law Environmental National Laboratories.
If there are any questions, please do not hesitate to contact us.
Sincerely,
LAW ENVIRONMENTAL NATL LkBS
r'#. ~-Y! ~4J
Clifford H. McBride
QA/QC Coordinator
I Attachment: Data Report
1 {/.ike Bush, GE-Hendersonville
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
09/05/89
1
Lab Number
Project No.
Project Name
89-3820-11
GVE-2231
LAW ENVIRONMENTAL NATIONAL LABORATORIES
TEST DATA REPORT
---Project Information ---
Cust. No.
SHEPHERD PROPERTY
Manager: GLEJ-IN SOFGE
Station ID
Matrix
Type
Collector
Remarks
WW-11
w
GRAB
GS
---Sample Information ---
Sampled Date/Time
Received Date/Time
Received From/By
Chain of Custody
Number of Containers
---Test Data ---
06/28/89 16:10
06/30/89 10: 15
GS/CLM
6980
3
Leter .... , ... ,,,,,,,, ......... ,, .. . Method .... Units Det. Limit Results ... Test Date Analy
IRGANICS PREP RESULTS --
OC SCREENING N/A 07/03/89 JAS I GANIC ANALYSIS RESULTS
odichloromethane EPA 601 ug/1 1.0 ND 07 /11/89 KD
r-omoform EPA 601 ug/1 2.0 ND 07 /11/89 KO
lomethane EPA 601 ug/1 12 ND 07 /11/89 KO
on tetrachloride EPA 601 ug/1 1.2 ND 07 /11/89 KO
h r-oethane EPA 601 ug/1 5.2 ND 07 /11/89 KD -Chlor-oethylvinyl ether EPA 601 ug/1 1.3 ND 07 /11/89 KD
lr-oform EPA 601 ug/1 0,5 ND 07/11/89 KD
, romethane EPA 601 ug/1 0.8 ND 07/11/89 KD
ibr-omochlor-omethane EPA 601 ug/1 0.9 ND 07 /11/89 KD
,,Dichlorobenzene EPA 601 ug/1 1.5 ND 07 /11/89 KD
, ·Dichlorobenzene EPA 601 ug/1 3.2 ND 07 /11/89 KD
, -Dichlorobenzene EPA 601 ug/1 2.4 ND 07 /11/89 KD
'lorodifluor-omethane EPA 601 ug/1 18 ND 07/11/89 KD
, Dichloroethane EPA 601 ug/1 0.7 ND 07 /11/89 KD
, Dichloroethane EPA 601 ug/1 0.3 ND 07 /11/89 KD
,1-Dichloroethene EPA 601 ug/1 1.3 ND 07 /11/89 KD
1s-1.2-Dichloroethene EPA 601 ug/1 1.0 ND 07 /11/89 KD Dichloropropane EPA 601 ug/1 0.4 ND 07 /11/89 KD
:s-1.3-Dichloropropene EPA 601 ug/1 3.4 ND 07/11/89 KD
,s-1,3-Dichloropropene EPA 601 ug/1 3,4 ND 07/11/89 KD
e ylene Chloride EPA 601 ug/1 2.5 ND 07 /11/89 KD
, ,2,2-Tetrachloroethane EPA 601 ug/1 0.3 ND 07 /11/89 KD
elachloroe thene EPA 601 ug/1 0.3 95 07/11/89 KD
, 1-Trichloroethane EPA 601 ug/1 0.3 ND 07 /11/89 KD
, ~-Trichloroethane EPA 601 ug/1 0.2 ND 07 /11/89 KO
I
C7 ~~L I Signed
,le 09/05/89
'age 2 ·
l 0 b Number
jl ject No.
I
89-3820-11
GVE-2231
LAW ENVIRONMENTAL NATIONAL LABORATORIES
TEST DATA REPORT
---Test Data ---
'arameter ............................. . Me.thod. . . . Uni ts Det. Limit Results ... Test Date Analy
loRGANIC ANALYSIS RESULTS
'richloroethene .1_, chlorofluoromethane
. yl Chloride
. zene
'hlorobenzene
:lylbenzene
uene.
:ylenes
I
'I
I
I
I
I·
I
I
I
EPA 601
EPA 601
EPA 601
EPA 602
EPA 602
EPA 602
EPA 602
EPA 602
ug/1 1.2 ND 07/11/89 KD ug/1 3.2 ND 07 /11/89 KD ug/1 1.8 ND 07/11/89 KD ug/1 1.0 ND 07 /11/89 KD ug/1 1.0 ND 07/11/89 KD ug/1 1.0 ND 07/11/89 KD
ug/1 1.0 ND 07 /11/89 KD ug/1 2.0 ND 07 /11/89 KD
Signed
I
I
I
I
.I
I
I
1·
I
I·
I
1,
·1
I
,I
I:
I
I
i
I
I
July 20, 1989
Law Engineering, Inc.
1100 Thousand Oaks Blvd.
Greenville, SC 29607
Attention: Glenn Sofge
LE Job Number: GVE-2231
LAW ENYIRONIEIITAL. INC.
112 JONNPIIII( DIM:
l<ENNESAI'( GaRilA 301~-5599 --~
p@m!!Wf!JID
JUL 2 1 1989
LAW ENGINEERING
GREENViLLE, S.C;
Subject: Chemical Analysis of Samples Received on 6/30/89---#89-3820-0l through 13
Dear Mr. Sofge:
Law Environmental National Laboratories has retested the above referenced samples and has revised the results of your report on the following pages. These results relate only to the contents of the samples as submitted. This report shall not be reproduced except in full without the approval of Law Environmental National Laboratories.
If there are any questions, please do not hesitate to contact us.
Sincerely,
LAW ENVIRONMENTAL NA~L L~
~~~c6JJ/
Clifford H. McBride
QA/QC Coordinator
Attachment: Data Report
I
I
I
I
I
I
07/20/89
1
Lab Number
Project No.
Project Ne.me
LAW ENVIRONMENTAL NATIONAL LABORATORIES
TEST DATA REPORT
---Project Information
89-3820-01
OVE-2231
SHEPHERD PROPERTY
Cust. No.
Manager: GLENN SOFGE
Station ID
Matrix
Type
Collector
Remarks
WW-1
w
GRAB
GS
Sample Information ---
Sampled Date/Time
Received Date/Time
Received From/By
Chain of Custody
Number of Containers
---Test Data ---
06/28/89 09:25
06/30/89 10: 15
GS/CLM
6980
3
Parameter ............................. . Method . . . . Uni ts Det. Limit Results ... Test Date Analy
•--ORGANICS PREP RESULTS --iloc voe SCREENING
I ORGANIC ANALYSIS RESULTS
l:iromodichloromethane '--
~ 3romoform
~romomethene
l~arbon tetrachloride
Chloroethane
12-Chloroethylvinyl ether
::hloroform
hloromethane
:_.Dibromochloromethane
11,2-Dichlorobenzene
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
I 1,4-Dichlorobenzene
l?ichlorodifluoromethane
w.,1-Dichloroethane
I
1,2 Dichloroethane
1,1-Dichloroethene t rans-1,2-Dichloroethene
' ,2-Dichloropropane I. cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
l,l'rans-1,3-Dichloropropene
■~ethylene Chloride
I 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
Eetrachloroethene
11,l,l-Trichloroethane
I 1,2-Trichloroethane
I
I
I
I
EPA 6ol ug/1
EPA 6ol ug/1
EPA 6ol ug/1
EPA 6o1 ug/1
EPA 6o1 ug/1
EPA 601 ug/1
EPA 601 ug/1
EPA 601 ug/1
EPA 6o1 ug/1
EPA 6o1 ug/1
EPA 601 ug/1
EPA 601 ug/1
EPA 601 ug/1
EPA 601 ug/1
EPA 601 ug/1
EPA 601 ug/1
EPA 601 ug/1
EPA 601 ug/1
EPA 601 ug/1
EPA 601 ug/1
EPA 601 ug/1
EPA 601 ug/1
EPA 601 ug/1
EPA 601 ug/1
EPA 601 ug/1
Signed
N/A 07/03/89 JAS
1.0 ND 07/03/89 BH
2.0 ND 07/03/89 BH
12 ND 07/03/89 BH
1.2 ND 07/03/89 BH
5,2 ND 07/03/89 BH
1.3 ND 07/03/89 BH
0.5 ND 07/03/89 BH
0.8 ND 07/03/89 BH
0.9 ND 07/03/89 BH
1.5 ND 07/03/89 BH
3.2 ND 07/03/89 BH
2.4 ND 07/03/89 BH
18 ND 07/03/89 BH
0.7 ND 07 /03/89 BH
0.3 ND 07/03/89 KD
1.3 ND 07/03/89 KD
1.0 ND 07/03/89 KD
o.4 ND 07/03/89 KD
3.4 ND 07/03/89 KD
3.4 ND 07/03/89 KD
2.5 ND 07/03/89 KD
0.3 ND 07/03/89 KD
0.3 ND 07/03/89 KD
0.3 ND 07/03/89 KD
0.2 ND 07/03/89 KD
/.~d
late 07/20/89
Page 2
I ab Nllllber
• ,-oject No.
I
89-3820-01
GVE-2231
LAW ENVIRONMENTAL NATIONAL LABORATORIES
TEST DATA REPORT
---Test Data ---
Parameter •..•.•••••............•...•••• Method .... Units Det. Limit Results .••
•-ORGANIC ANALYSIS RESULTS Trichloroethene
richlorofluoromethane
nyl Chloride
nzene
f:lorobenzene
hylbenzene
oluene
.,lenea
I
I
I
1•
I
I
I
' I
I
I
I :
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I '.
I
I
I
EPA 6o1 ug/1 1.2 ND
EPA 6o1 ug/1 3,2 ND EPA 6o1 ug/1 1.8 ND EPA 6o2 ug/1 1.0 ND EPA 6o2 ug/1 1.0 ND EPA 6o2 ug/1 1.0 ND EPA 6o2 ug/1 1.0 ND EPA 6o2 ug/1 2.0 ND
Signed
Test Date Analy
07/03/89 KD
rr,/03/89 KD
rr,/03/89 KD
07/03/89 KD
07/03/89 KD
07/03/89 KD
rr,/03/89 KD
07/03/89 KD
Page
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
07/20/89
1
Lab Number
Project No.
Project NBlle
89-3820-02
GVE-2231
LAW ENVIRONMEh'I'AL NATIONAL LABORATORIES
TEST DATA REPORT
---Project Information
Cust. No.
SHEPHERD PROPERTY
Manager: GLENN SOFGE
Station ID
Matrix
Type
Collector
Remarks
WW-2
w
GRAB
GS
---Saaple Information ---
Sampled Date/Time
Received Date/Tille
Received From/By
Chain of Custody
Number of Containers
---Test Data ---
06/28/89 09:55
06/30/89 10: 15
GS/CLM
6980
3
Parameter .............................. Method .... Units Det. Limit Results ... Test Date Analy l ORGANICS PREP RESULTS --voe SCREENING N/A 07/03/89 JAS I ORGANIC ANALYSIS RESULTS
·omodichloromethane EPA 601 ug/1 1.0 ND 07/03/89 KD :-omoform EPA 601 ug/1 2.0 ND 07/03/89 KD
lromomethane EPA 601 ug/1 12 ND 07/03/89 KD arbon tetrachloride EPA 601 ug/1 1.2 ND 07/03/89 KD loroethane EPA 601 ug/1 5.2 ND 07/03/89 KD 2-Chloroethylvinyl ether EPA 601 ug/1 1.3 ND 07 /03/89 · KD tloroform EPA 601 ug/1 0.5 ND 07/03/89 KD loromethane EPA 601 ug/1 0.8 ND 07/03/89 KD Dibromochloromethane EPA 601 ug/1 0.9 ND 07/03/89 KD •• 2-Dichlorobenzene EPA 601 ug/1 1.5 ND 07/03/89 KD , , 3-Dichlorobenzene EPA 601 ug/1 3.2 ND 07/03/89 KD [ 1,4-Dichlorobenzene EPA 601 ug/1 2.4 ND 07/03/89 KD 'ichlorodifluoromethane EPA 601 ug/1 18 ND 07/03/89 KD ,1-Dichloroethane EPA 601 ug/1 0.7 ND 07/03/89 KD [ ,2 Dichloroethane EPA 601 ug/1 0.3 ND 07/03/89 KD 1,1-Dichloroethene EPA 601 ug/1 1.3 ND 07/03/89 KD tans-1,2-Dichloroethene EPA 601 ug/1 1.0 ND 07/03/89 KD ,2-Dichloropropane EPA 601 ug/1 0.4 ND 07/03/89 KD [cis-1,3-Dichloropropene EPA 601 ug/1 3.4 ND 07/03/89 KD f.ans-1,3-Dichloropropene EPA 601 ug/1 3.4 ND 07/03/89 KD thylene Chloride EPA 601 ug/1 2.5 ND 07/03/89 KD I ,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane EPA 601 ug/1 0.3 ND 07/03/89 KD rtrachloroethene EPA 601 ug/1 0.3 ND 07/03/89 KD 1,1-Trichloroethane EPA 601 ug/1 0.3 ND 07/03/89 KD I ",2-Trichloroethane EPA 601 ug/1 0.2 ND 07/03/89 KD
I /:74,,<IJJ I
I Signed
I
lte 07 /20/89
Page 2
I ab Number 89-3820-02
.roject No. OVE-2231
I
LAW ENVIRONMENTAL NATIONAL LABORATORIES
TEST DATA REPORT
---Test Data ---
Parameter ........•.....•............... Method .... Units Det. Limit Results ...
•-ORGANIC ANALYSIS RESULTS --
Trichloroethene
!i1'ichlorofluoromethane
■inyl Chloride
Benzene
f lorobenzene
hylbenzene
oluene
.,ylenes
I
I
I
I
I
I
II
II·
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
!
I
I I
I
EPA 601 ug/1 1.2 ND
EPA 601 ug/1 3.2 ND
EPA 601 ug/1 1.8 ND
EPA 602 ug/1 1.0 ND
EPA 602 ug/1 1.0 ND
EPA 602 ug/1 1.0 ND
EPA 602 ug/1 1.0 ND
EPA 602 ug/1 2.0 ND
Signed
Test Date Analy
07/03/89 KD
07/03/89 KD
07/03/89 KD
07/03/89 KD
07/03/89 KD
07/03/89 KD
07/03/89 KD
07/03/89 KD
late
Page
I
I
I
I
I
I
07/20/89
1
Lab Nuaber
Project No.
Project Name
LAW ENVIRONMENTAL NATIONAL LABORATORIES
TEST DATA REPORT
89-3820-03
OVE-2231
---Project Infonaation
SHEPHERD PROPERTY
Cust. No.
Manager: GLENN SOFGE
Station ID
Matrix
Type
Collector
Remarks
WW-3 w
GRAB
GS
---Sample Infonaation ---
Sampled Date/Time
Received Date/Time
Received From/By
Chain of Custody
Number of Containers
---Test Data ---
06/28/89 10: 10
06/30/89 10: 15
GS/CLM
698o
3
'arameter ...........••.•............... Method . . . . Uni ts Det. Limit Results ... Test Date Analy l ORGANICS PREP RESULTS --voe SCREENING N/A 07/03/89 JAS
I ORGANIC ANALYSIS RESULTS
romodichloromethane EPA 601 ug/1 1.0 ND 07/03/89 KD
--omoform EPA 601 ug/1 2.0 ND 07/03/89 KD
• -:imomethane EPA 601 ug/1 12 ND 07/03/89 KD
rbon tetrachloride EPA 601 ug/1 1.2 ND 07/03/89 KD
.loroethane EPA 601 ug/1 5.2 ND 07/03/89 KD
·Chloroethylvinyl ether EPA 601 ug/1 1.3 ND 07/03/89 KD
lhloroform EPA 601 ug/1 0.5 ND 07/03/89 KD
hloromethane EPA 601 ug/1 0.8 ND 07/03/89 KD
Dibromochloromethane EPA 601 ug/1 0.9 ND 07/03/89 KD
,,2-Dichlorobenzene EPA 601 ug/1 1.5 ND 07/03/89 KD
,3-Dichlorobenzene EPA 601 ug/1 3.2 ND 07/03/89 KD
1,4-Dichlorobenzene EPA 601 ug/1 2.4 ND 07/03/89 KD
-ichlorodifluoromethane EPA 601 ug/1 18 ND 07/03/89 KD
,1-Dichloroethane EPA 601 ug/1 0.7 ND 07/03/89 KD
,2 Dichloroethane EPA 601 ug/1 0.3 ND 07/03/89 KD
1,1-Dichloroethene EPA 601 ug/1 1.3 ND 07/03/89 KD
lrans-1,2-Dichloroethene EPA 601 ug/1 1.0 ND 07/03/89 KD
,2-Dichloropropane EPA 601 ug/1 0.4 ND 07/03/89 KD
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene EPA 601 ug/1 3.4 ND 07/03/89 KD
-rans-1,3-Dichloropropene EPA 601 ug/1 .3.4 ND 07/03/89 KD
ethylene Chloride EPA 601 ug/1 2.5 ND 07/03/89 KD
,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane EPA 601 ug/1 0. 3 ND 07/03/89 KD
Tetrachloroethene EPA 601 ug/1 0.3 ND 07/03/89 KD
,,1,1-Trichloroethane EPA 601 ug/1 0.3 ND 07/03/89 KD
1,2-Trichloroethane EPA 601 ug/1 0.2 ND 07/03/89 KD
I c!:~c,6J I Signed
late 07 /20/89
Page 2
I ,eb Number 89-3820-03
,roject No. GVE-2231
I
LAW ENVIRONMENTAL NATIONAL LABORATORIES
TE.ST DATA REPORT
---Test Date ---
Parameter ............................. . Method .... Unite Det. Limit Results ... 1-ORGANIC ANALYSIS RESULTS --
Trichloroethene
chlorofluoromethene
inyl Chloride
zene
l:hlorobenzene
.thylbenzene
.oluene
Xylenes
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
g
u
m
I
I
EPA 6ol
EPA 6ol
EPA 6ol
EPA 6o2
EPA 6o2
EPA 6o2
EPA 6o2
EPA 6o2
ug/1 1.2 ND
ug/1 3.2 ND
ug/1 1.8 ND
ug/1 1.0 ND
ug/1 1.0 ND
ug/1 1.0 ND
ug/1 1.0 ND ug/1 2.0 ND
Signed
Teet Date Anely
07/03/89 KO
07/03/89 KO
07/03/89 KO
07/03/89 KO
07/03/89 KO
07/03/89 KO
07/03/89 KO
07/03/89 KO
Page
I
I
I
I
I
I
07/20/89
1
Lab Number
Project No.
Project Name
89-3820-04
GVE-2231
LAW ENVIRONMENTAL NATIONAL LABORATORIES
TEST DATA REPORT
---Project Information ---
Gust. No.
SHEPHERD PROPERTY
Manager: GLENN SOFGE
Station ID
Matrix
Type
Collector
Remarks
ww-4
w
GRAB
GS
Sample Information ---
Sampled Date/Tille
Received Date/Time
Received Froa/By
Chain of Custody
Number of Containers
---Test Data ---
06/28/89 11 :05
06/30/89 10: 15
G.5/CLM
6980
3
'arameter ...•.........•................ Method .... Units Det. Limit Results ... Test Date Analy
Ii-ORGANICS PREP RESULTS --le voe SCREENING
I ORGANIC ANALYSIS RESULTS
romodichloromethane
Bromoform
lromomethane
rbon tetrachloride
loroethane
2-Chloroethylvinyl ether
llt,loroform
llhloromethane
ibromochloromethane
• ,• 2-Dichlorobenzene
,3-Dichlorobenzene
,4-Dichlorobenzene
f chlorodifluoromethane
1-Dichloroethane
,2 Dichloroethane
1,1-Dichloroethene
l ans-1,2-Dichloroethene
2-Dichloropropane
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
f.ans-1,3-Dichloropropene
thylene Chloride
,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
Tetrachloroethene
i ll, 1, 1-Trichloroethane II 1 ,2-Trichloroethane
I
I
EPA 6ol
EPA 6ol
EPA 6ol
EPA 6ol
EPA 6ol
EPA 6ol
EPA 6ol
EPA 6ol
EPA 6ol
EPA 6ol
EPA 6ol
EPA 6ol
EPA 6ol
EPA 6o1
EPA 6o1
EPA 6o1
EPA 6o1
EPA 6ol
EPA 6ol
EPA 6ol
EPA 6o1
EPA 6o1
EPA 6ol
EPA 6ol
EPA 6ol
ug/1 1.0
ug/1 2.0
ug/1 12
ug/1 1.2
ug/1 5.2
ug/1 1.3
ug/1 0.5
ug/1 0.8
ug/1 0.9
ug/1 1.5
ug/1 3.2
ug/1 2.4
ug/1 18
ug/1 0.7
ug/1 0.3
ug/1 1.3
ug/1 1.0
ug/1 o.4
ug/1 3.4
ug/1 3.4
ug/1 2.5
ug/1 0,3
ug/1 0.3
ug/1 0.3
ug/1 0.2
Signed
N/A 07/03/89 JAS
ND 0,7/03/89 KO
ND 07/03/89 KO
ND 07/03/89 KO
ND 07 /03/89 KD
ND 07 /03/89 KO
ND 07/03/89 KD
ND 07/03/89 KD
ND 07/03/89 KD
ND 07 /03/89 KD
ND 07/03/89 KD
ND 07 /03/89 KD
ND 07/03/89 KD
ND 07/03/89 KD
ND 07 /03/89 KD
ND 07/03/89 KD
ND 07/03/89 KD
ND 07/03/89 KD
ND 07/03/89 KD
ND 07/03/89 KD
ND 07/03/89 KD
ND 07/03/89 KD
ND 07/03/89 KD
ND 07/03/89 KO
ND 07/03/89 KO
ND 07/03/89 KO
89-3820-04
GVE-2231
LAW ENVIRONMENTAL NATIONAL LABORATORIES
TEST DATA REPORT
---Test Data ---
rameter ............................. .
--ORGANIC ANALYSIS RESULTS --
Trichloroethene
Method .... Units Det. Limit Results ...
l ichlorofluoromethane
nyl Chloride
Benzene
l lorobenzene
hylbenzene
1luene
flenes
I
I
I
I
I
D
I
I
I
I
I
I
EPA 601
EPA 601
EPA 601
EPA 602
EPA 602
EPA 602
EPA 602
EPA 602
ug/1 1.2 ND
ug/1 3.2 ND
ug/1 1.8 ND
ug/1 1.0 ND
ug/1 1.0 ND
ug/1 1.0 ND
ug/1 1.0 ND
ug/1 2.0 ND
Signed
Test Date Analy
07/03/89 !CD
07/03/89 KD
07/03/89 !CD
07/03/89 KD
07/03/89 KD
07/03/89 KD
07/03/89 KD
07/03/89 KD
I Date
lage
I
I
I
I
I
I
07/20/89
1
Lab Number
Project No.
Project Name
89-3820-05
GVE-2231
LAW ENVIRONMENTAL NATIONAL LABORATORIFS
TEST DATA REPORT
---Project Info=ation
Cust. No.
SHEPHERD PROPERTY
Manager: GLENN SOFGE
Station ID
Matrix
Type
Collector
Remarks
WW-5
w
GRAB
GS
---Sample Info=ation ---
S811lpled Date/Time
Received Date/Time
Received From/By
Chain of Custody
Number o·r Containers
---Test Data ---
06/28/89 11 :40
06/30/89 10: 15
GS/CLM
6980
3
Parameter ............................. . Method . . . . Uni ts Det. Limit Results ... Test Date Analy
I-ORGANICS PREP RESULTS --
GC voe SCREENING
I ORGANIC ANALYSIS RESULTS
romodichloromethane
Bromo f OI'll
l romomethane
arbon tetrachloride
Chloroethane
-
-Chloroethylvinyl ether
hlorofo=
hloromethane
Dibromochloromethane 1,2-Dichlorobenzene
,3-Dichlorobenzene
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
l ichlorodifluoromethane
,1-Dichloroethane
1,2 Dichloroethane
-
,1-Dichloroethene
rans-1,2-Dichloroethene
,2-Dichloropropane
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
ltrans-1,3-Dichloropropene
llethylene Chloride
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
l etrachloroethene
,1,1-Trichloroethane
'-, 2-Trichloroethane
I
I
EPA 601
EPA 601
EPA 601
EPA 601
EPA 601
EPA 601
EPA 601
EPA 601
EPA 601
EPA 601
EPA 601
EPA 601
EPA 601
EPA 601
EPA 601
EPA 601
EPA 601
EPA 601
EPA 601
EPA 601
EPA 601
EPA 601
EPA 601
EPA 601
EPA 601
N/A 07/03/89 JAS
ug/1 1.0 ND 07/03/89 KD
ug/1 2.0 ND 07/03/89 KD
ug/1 12 ND 07/03/89 KD
ug/1 1.2 ND 07/03/89 KD
ug/1 5.2 ND 07 /03/89 KD
ug/1 1.3 ND 07 /03/89 KD
ug/1 0.5 ND 07 /03/89 KD
ug/1 0.8 ND 07 /03/89 KD
ug/1 0.9 ND 07 /03/89 KD
ug/1 1.5 ND 07 /03/89 KD
ug/1 3.2 ND 07 /03/89 KD
ug/1 2.4 ND 07 /03/89 KD
ug/1 18 ND 07 /03/89 KD
ug/1 0.7 ND 07/03/89 KD
ug/1 0.3 ND 07/03/89 KD
ug/1 1.3 ND 07 /03/89 KD
ug/1 1.0 ND 07/03/89 KD
ug/1 o.4 ND 07/03/89 KD
ug/1 3,4 ND 07/03/89 KD
ug/1 3,4 ND 07/03/89 KD
ug/1 2.5 ND 07/03/89 KD
ug/1 0.3 ND 07/03/89 KD
ug/1 0.3 ND 07/03/89 KD
ug/1 0.3 ND 07/03/89 KD
ug/1 0.2 ND 07 /03/89 KD
Signed ~~G~
1/20/89
2 I er
,ct .-o.
I
89-3820-05
GVE-2231
LAW ENVIRONMENTAL NATIONAL LABORATORIES
TEST DATA REPORT
---Test Data ---
1:~-~~~~~~-:~~-~~········· Method .... Units Det. Limit Results ...
oroethene
cjjofluoromethane
dlloride
e
yzene
.ene
~
31
I
I
I
I
I
I
•
I
I
D
I
I
EPA 6o1
EPA 6o1
EPA 6ol
EPA 6o2
EPA 6o2
EPA 6o2
EPA 6o2
EPA 6o2
ug/1 1.2 ND
ug/1 3.2 ND
ug/1 1.8 ND ug/1 1.0 ND
ug/1 1.0 ND ug/1 1.0 ND
ug/1 1.0 ND ug/1 2.0 ND
Signed
Test Date Analy
07/03/89 KO
07/03/89 KO
07/03/89 KO
07/03/89 KO
07/03/89 KO
07/03/89 KO
07/03/89 KO
07/03/89 KO
10
15
naly
AS
!D iD
jo
:0
:0
JJ
JJ
m
CD
CD
µ>
CD
CD
CD
!H
aH
SH
SH
SH
SH
SH
BH
BH.
BH
BH
lte 07/20/89
Page 2 I 'ib Number 89-3820-06
.. 0ject No. GVE-2231
I
LAW ENVIRONMENTAL NATIONAL LABORATORIES
TEST DATA REPORT
---Test Data ---
Para.meter .............................• Method .... Units Det. Limit Results ... I ORGANIC ANALYSIS RESULTS --
Trichloroethene
l ichlorofluoromethane
nyl Chloride
Benzene
l~hlorobenzene
hylbenzene
)luene
;lenes
I
I
I
I
I
I
D
u
I
I
I
I
I
EPA 601
FPA 601
EPA 601
EPA 602
EPA 602
EPA 602
EPA 602
FPA 602
ug/1 1.2 ND
ug/1 3.2 ND
ug/1 1.8 ND
ug/1 1.0 ND
ug/1 1.0 ND
ug/1 1.0 ND
ug/1 1.0 ND
ug/1 2.0 ND
Signed
Teet Date Analy
07/03/89 BH
07/03/89 BH
07/03/89 BH
07/03/89 BH
07/03/89 BH
07/03/89 BH
07/03/89 BH
07/03/89 BH
late
Page
I
I
I
I
I
I
07/20/89
'1
Lab Number
Project No.
Project Name
LAW ENVIRONMENTAL NATIONAL LABORATORIFS nsT DATA REPORT
---Project Information ---
89-3820-07
GVE-2231
SHEPHERD PROPERTY Cust. No.
Manager: GLENN SOFGE
Station ID
Matrix
Type
Collector
Remarks
'wW-7
w
GRAB
GS
Saaple Information ---
Sampled Date/Time
Received Date/Time
Received From/By
Chain of Custody
Number of Containers
---Test Data ---
06/28/89 11: 55
06/30/89 10: 15
GS/CLM
6980
3
'arameter .............................. Method .... Units Det. Liai t Results ... Test Date Analy I ORGANICS PREP RESULTS --voe SCREENING N/A 07/03/89 JAS I lRGANIC ANALYSIS RESULTS
omodichloromethane EPA 601 ug/1 1.0 ND 07/03/89 KD ,:,omoform EPA 601 ug/1 2.0 ND 07/03/89 KD ··omomethane EPA 601 ug/1 12 ND 07/03/89 KD ,rbon tetrachloride EPA 601 ug/1 1.2 ND 07/03/89 KD loroethane EPA 601 ug/1 5.2 ND 07/03/89 KD ·Chloroethylvinyl ether EPA 601 ug/1 1.3 ND 07/03/89 KD lloroform EPA 601 ug/1 0.5 ND 07/03/89 KD loromethane EPA 601 ug/1 0.8 ND 07/03/89 KD Dibromochloromethane EPA 601 ug/1 0.9 ND 07/03/89 KD 12-Dichlorobenzene EPA 601 ug/1 1.5 ND 07/03/89 KD 3-Dichlorobenzene EPA 601 ug/1 3,2 ND 07/03/89 KD 1,4-Dichlorobenzene EPA 601 ug/1 2.4 ND 07/03/89 KD lchlorodifluoromethane EPA 601 ug/1_ 18 ND 07/03/89 KD 1-Dichloroethane EPA 601 ug/1 0.7 ND 07/03/89 KD ,2 Dichloroethane EPA 601 ug/1 0.3 ND 07/03/89 KD ·1, 1-Dichloroethene EPA 601 ug/1 1.3 ND 07/03/89 KD ~-1,2-Dichloroethene EPA 601 ug/1 1.0 ND 07/03/89 KD Dichloropropane EPA 601 ug/1 0.4 ND 07/03/89 KD cis-1,3-Dichloropropene EPA 601 ug/1 3.4 ND 07/03/89 KD F,-1,3-Dichloropropene EPA 601 ug/1 3,4 ND 07/03/89 KD ylene Chloride EPA 601 ug/1 2.5 ND 07/03/89 KD , ,2,2-Tetrachloroethane EPA 601 ug/1 0.3 ND 07/03/89 KD Tetrachloroethene EPA 601 ug/1 0.3 ND 07/03/89 KD t,1-Trichloroethane EPA 601 ug/1 0.3 ND 07/03/89 KD l 2-Trichloroethane EPA 601 ug/1 0.2 ND 07/03/89 KD
I C'/2.,<d I Signed
'ate 07/20/89
Page 2
I ab Number
, roject No.
I
89-3820-07
GVE-2231
LAW ENVIRONMENTAL NATIONAL LABORATORIE.5
TEST DATA REPORT
---Test Data ---
e:r:::~-~~~~~~-~~~-~~········· Method •..• Units Det. Liait Results ...
Trichloroethene
llirichlorofluoromethane
lli_nyl Chloride
Benzene
.
f11lorobenzene
lthylbenzene
oluene
'lenes
I
I
I
I
D
m
I
I
I
I
I
I
F.PA 601
F.PA 601
EPA 601
F.PA 602
EPA 602
EPA 602
EPA 602
EPA 602
ug/1 1.2 ND
ug/1 3,2 ND
ug/1 1.8 ND
ug/1 1.0 ND
ug/1 1.0 ND
ug/1 1.0 ND
ug/1 1.0 ND
ug/1 2.0 ND
Signed
Test Date Analy
07/03/89 KD
07/03/89 KD
07/03/89 KD
07/03/89 KD
07/03/89 KD
07/03/89 KD
07/03/89 KD
07/03/89 KD
Page
I
I
I
I
I
I
07/20/89
1
LAW ENVIRONMENTAL NATIONAL LABORATORIES
TEST DATA REPORT
Lab Number
Project No.
---Project Information ---
89-3820-08
GVE-2231 Cust. No.
Project Name SHEPHERD PROPERTY
Manager: GLENN SOFGE
Station ID WW-8
Matrix W
Type GRAB
Collector GS
Remarks
---Sample Information ---
Sampled Date/Time
Received Date/Time
Received From/By
Chain of Custody
Number of Containers
---Test Data ---
06/28/89 13:55
06/30/89 10:15
GS/CLM
698o
3
'arameter .............................. Method. • . . Uni ts Det. Li■i t Results ... Test Date Analy l ORGANICS PREP RESULTS --voe SCREENING N/A 07 /03/89 JAS I ORGANIC ANALYSIS RESULTS
• -omodichloromethane EPA 601 ug/1 1.0 ND 07/03/89 KO 3romoform EPA 601 ug/1 2.0 ND 07/03/89 KO
~romomethane EPA 601 ug/1 12 ND 07/03/89 KO arbon tetrachloride EPA 601 ug/1 1.2 ND 07/03/89 KD loroethane EPA 601 ug/1 5,2 ND 07/03/89 KD 2-Chloroethylvinyl ether EPA 601 ug/1 1.3 ND 07/03/89 KD mhloroform EPA 601 ug/1 0.5 ND 07/03/89 KD hloromethane EPA 601 ug/1 0.8 ND 07 /03/89 KD Dibromochloromethane EPA 601 ug/1 0.9 ND 07/03/89 KD ,,2-Dichlorobenzene EPA 601 ug/1 1.5 ND 07/03/89 KD ,3-Dichlorobenzene EPA 601 ug/1 3.2 ND 07/03/89 KD 1,4-Dichlorobenzene EPA 601 ug/1 2.4 ND 07/03/89 KD lichlorodifluoromethane EPA 601 ug/1 18 ND 07/03/89 KD ', 1-Dichloroethane EPA 601 ug/1 0.7 ND 07 /03/89 KD ,2 Dichloroethane EPA 601 ug/1 0.3 ND 07/03/89 KD 1,1-Dichloroethene EPA 601 ug/1 1.3 ND 07/03/89 KD lt.ans-1,2-Dichloroethene EPA 601 ug/1 1.0 ND 07/03/89 KD 2-Dichloropropane EPA 601 ug/1 0.4 ND 07/03/89 KD cis-1,3-Dichloropropene EPA 601 ug/1 3.4 ND 07/03/89 KD f.ans-1,3-Dichloropropene EPA 601 ug/1 3,4 ND 07/03/89 KD thylene Chloride EPA 601 ug/1 2.5 ND 07/03/89 KD ,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane EPA 601 ug/1 0.3 ND 07/03/89 KD ,trachloroethene EPA 601 ug/1 0.3 ND 07 /03/89 KD 1,1-Trichloroethane EPA 601 ug/1 0.3 ND 07/03/89 KD 1 ,2-Trichloroethane EPA 601 ug/1 0.2 ND 07/03/89 KD
m ,:'?--,,.,,J
I Signed
late 07 /20/89
Page 2
I 3b Number
Project No.
•·
89-3820-08
GVE-2231
LAW ENVIRONMENTAL NATIONAL LABORATORIES
TEST DATA REPORT
---Tes·t Data ---
r:::~-~~~~~~-~~~-~~---······ Method .... Units Det. Limit Results ...
Trichloroethene
llrichlorofluoromethane
llinyl Chloride
Benzene
.li11orobenzene
lthYlbenzene
~luene
,lylenes
,1·
I
•
I
I
D
D
I
I
1·
I
I
EPA 601
EPA 601
EPA 601
EPA 602
EPA 602
EPA 602
EPA 602
EPA 602
ug/1 1.2 ND
ug/1 3.2 ND
ug/1 1.8 ND
ug/1 1.0 ND
ug/1 1.0 ND
ug/1 1.0 ND
ug/1 1.0 ND
ug/1 2.0 ND
Signed
Test Date Analy
07/03/89 KO
07/03/89 KO
07/03/89 KO
07/03/89 KO
07/03/89 KO
07/03/89 KO
07/03/89 KO
07/03/89 KO
Page
I
I
I
I'
I
I
07/20/89
1
LAW ENVIRONMENTAL NATIONAL LABORATORIES
TEST DATA REPORT
Lab Number
Project No.
---Project Information
89-3820-13
GVE-2231 Cust. No.
Project Name SHEPHERD PROPERTY
Manager: GLENN SOFGE
Station ID TRIP BLANK
Matrix W
Type GRAB
Collector GS
Remarks
---Sample Information ---
Sampled Date/Time
Received Date/Time
Received From/By
Chain of Custody
Number of Containers
---Test Data ---
I I
06/30/89 10: 15
GS/CLM
6980
3
'arameter ................•............. Method .... Units Det. Limit Results ... Test Date Analy l ORGANICS. PREP RESULTS --voe SCREENING N/A 07/03/89 JAS I. )RGANIC ANALYSIS RESULTS
EPA 6o1 ug/1 1.0 ND 07/03/89 KD '.lmodichloromethane .
.>moform EPA 6o1 ug/1 2.0 ND 07/03/89 KD • -omomethane EPA 6ol ug/1 12 ND 07/03/89 KD ,rbon tetrachloride EPA 6ol ug/1 1.2 ND 07 /03/89 KD :1loroethane EPA 6o1 ug/1 5.2 ND 07/03/89 KD -Chloroethylvinyl ether EPA 6ol ug/1 1.3 ND 07/03/89 KD l'hloroform EPA 6ol ug/1 0.5 ND 07/03/89 KD hloromethane EPA 6ol ug/1 0.8 ND 07/03/89 KD Dibromochloromethane EPA 6ol ug/1 0.9 ND 07/03/89 KD u,2-Dichlorobenzene EPA 6ol ug/1 1.5 ND 07/03/89 KD ,3-Dichlorobenzene EPA 6ol ug/1 3,2 ND 07/03/89 KD 1,4-Dichlorobenzene EPA 6ol ug/1 2.4 ND 07/03/89 KD dichlorodifluoromethane EPA 6ol ug/1 18 ND 07/03/89 KD ,1-Dichloroethane EPA 6ol ug/1 0.7 ND 07 /03/89 KD '_',2 Dichloroethane EPA 6ol ug/1 0.3 1.9 07 /03/89 KD 1,1-Dichloroethene EPA 6ol ug/1 1.3 ND 07/03/89 KD tans-1,2-Dichloroethene EPA 6o1 ug/1 1.0 ND 07/03/89 KD 2-Dichloropropane EPA 6ol ug/1 0.4 ND 07/03/89 KD cis-1,3-Dichloropropene EPA 6ol ug/1 3,4 ND 07/03/89 KD u:;ans-1,3-Dichloropropene EPA 6o1 ug/1 3,4 ND 07/03/89 KD thylene Chloride EPA 6ol ug/1 2.5 3,6 07/03/89 KD ,,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane EPA 6ol ug/1 0.3 ND 07/03/89 KD Tetrachloroethene EPA 6ol ug/1 0.3 ND 07/03/89 KD ,,1,1-Trichloroethane EPA 6ol ug/1 0.3 ND 07/03/89 KD • ,2-Trichloroethane EPA 6ol ug/1 0.2 ND 07/03/89 KD
I ~~ed I Signed
lte 07/20/89
?,age 2 I b_ Number
t.vject No.
I
89-3820-13
GVE-2231
LAW ENVIRONMENTAL NATIONAL LABORATORIES
TEST DATA REPORT
.---Test Data ---
Parameter ............................. . Method .... Units Det. Limit Results ... I ORGANIC ANALYSIS RFSULTS
Trichloroethene
lichlorofluoromethane
nyl Chloride
nzene
ilorobenzene
hylbenzene
'luene
:ylenes
I
·1
I
I
I
I
I
D
I
I
I
I
I
EPA 601
EPA 601
EPA 601
EPA 602
EPA 602
EPA 602
EPA 602
EPA 602
ug/1 1.2 ND
ug/1 3,2 ND
ug/1 1.8 ND
ug/1 1.0 ND
ug/1 1.0 ND
ug/1 1.0 ND
ug/1 1.0 ND
ug/1 2.0 ND
Signed
Test Date Analy
07/03/89 KO
07/03/89 KO
07 /03/89 KO
07/03/89 KO
07/03/89 KO
07/03/89 KO
07/03/89 KO
07/03/89 KO
loate 07/20/89
Page 2
I ab Number
• roject No.
I
89-3820-11
GVE-2231
LAW ENVIRONMENTAL NATIONAL LABORATORIES
TEST DATA REPORT
---Test Data ---
Parameter ......................... · .... . Method •... Units Det. Limit Results ...
(_ ORGANIC ANALYSIS RESULTS
Trichloroethene
lfrichlorofluoromethane
11-'inyl Chloride
3enzene
l'hlorobenzene
·:hylbenzene
luene
I
I
I
I
n
R
I
I
I
~enes
EPA 6ol
EPA 6ol
EPA 6ol
EPA 6o2
EPA 6o2
EPA 6o2
EPA 6o2
EPA 6o2
ug/1 1.2 ND
ug/1 3,2 ND
ug/1 1.8 ND
ug/1 1.0 ND
ug/1 1.0 ND
ug/1 1.0 ND
ug/1. 1.0 ND
ug/1 2.0 ND
Signed
Test Date Analy
07/11/89 KD
07/11/89 KD
07 /11/89 KD
07/11/89 KD
07/11/89 KD
07/11/89 KD
07/11/89 KD
07/11/89 KD
lte
Page
I
I
I
I
I
I
07/20/89
1
Lab Number
Project No.
Project Name
LAW ENVIRONMENTAL NATIONAL LABORATORIES
TEST DATA REPORT
---Project Information
89-3820-11
GVE-2231
SHEPHERD PROPERTY Cust. No.
Manager: GLENN SOFGE
Station ID
Matrix
Type
Collector
Remarks
WW-11
w
GRAB
GS
---Sample Information ---
Sampled Date/Time
Received Date/Time
Received From/By
Chain of Custody
Number of Containers
---Test Data ---
06/28/89 16: 10
06/30/89 10:15
CJS/CLM
-6980
3
,lameter. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Method. . . . Uni ts Det. Limit Results. . . Test Date Analy JORGANICS PREP RESULTS --' voe SCREENING
·• :GANIC ANALYSIS RESULTS l,amodichloromethane
lromoform
1Emethane : n tetrachloride
. oroethane
-Chloroethylvinyl ether
tll:>roform
tlliromethane
ibromochloromethane
,,Dichlorobenzene
, Dichlorobenzene
, -Dichlorobenzene
iflorodifluoromethane
, Dichloroethane
, Dichloroethane
,1-Dichloroethene
~,. s-1,2-Dichloroethene
, Dichloropropane
is-1,3-Dichloropropene
~,s-1,3-Dichloropropene
~ ylene Chloride
, ,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
?Dachloroethene
, 1-Trichloroethane
. ~-Trichloroethane
D
I
EPA 601 ug/1
EPA 601 ug/1
EPA 601 ug/1
EPA 601 ug/1
EPA 601 ug/1
EPA 601 ug/1
EPA 601 ug/1
EPA 601 ug/1
EPA 601 ug/1
EPA 601 ug/1
EPA 601 ug/1
EPA 601 ug/1
EPA 601 ug/1
EPA 601 ug/1
EPA 601 ug/1
EPA 601 ug/1
EPA 601 ug/1
EPA 601 ug/1
EPA 601 ug/1
EPA 601 ug/1
EPA 601 ug/1
EPA 601 ug/1
EPA 601 ug/1
EPA 601 ug/1
EPA 601 ug/1
Signed
N/A 07/03/89 JAS
1.0 ND 07 /11/89 KD 2.0 ND 07/11/89 KD 12 ND 07/11/89 KD 1.2 ND 07/11/89 KD 5.2 ND 07 /11/89 KD 1.3 ND 07 /11/89 KD 0.5 ND 07/11/89 KD 0.8 ND 07 /11/89 KD 0.9 ND 07 /11/89 KD 1.5 ND 07 /11/89 KD 3.2 ND 07 /11/89 KD 2.4 ND 07 /11/89 KD 18 ND 07 /11/89 KD 0.7 ND 07/11/89 KD 0.3 ND 07/11/89 KD 1.3 ND 07 /11/89 KD 1.0 ND 07 /11/89 KD 0.4 ND 07 /11/89 KD 3.4 ND 07/11/89 KD 3.4 ND 07 /11/89 KD 2.5 ND 07/11/89 KD 0.3 ND 07/11/89 KD 0.3 NDs;', 07 /11/89 KD 0.3 ND 07 /11/89 KD 0.2 ND 07/11/89 KD
late
Page
07/20/89
2 I -':> Nuaber
.. ...,ject No.
I
89-3820-12
ClVE-2231
LAW ENVIRONMENTAL NATIONAL LABORATORIES
TEST DATA REPORT
Test Data
Parameter ..••••.••••..•••....••.•••.... Method •••• Units Det. Limit Results .••
•-ORGANIC ANALYSIS RESULTS
Trichloroethene
l richlorofluoromethane
inyl Chloride
Benzene
l:::hlorobenzene
-thylbenzene
.Jluene
Xylenes
I
I
I
I
I
D
B
I
I
I
I
I
I
EPA 601
EPA 601
EPA 601
EPA 602
EPA 602
EPA 602
EPA 602
EPA 602
ug/1 1.2 ND
ug/1 3.2 ND
ug/1 1.8 ND
ug/1 1.0 ND
ug/1 1.0 ND
ug/1 1.0 ND
ug/1 1.0 ND .
ug/1 2.0 ND
Signed
Test Date Analy
07/03/89 KD
07/03/89 . KD
07/03/89 KD
07/03/89 KD
07/03/89 KD
07/03/89 KD
07/03/89 KD
07/03/89 KD
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
D
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
July 28, 1989
LAW ENOINEERINO
geotechnical, env,n:,nroontal & construction ma1erials consultants
1100 THOUSAND OAKS BLVD.
GOLDEN OAKS BUSINESS PARK
GREENVILLE, SOUTH CAROLINA 29607
[phone]
General Electric Light System
P.O. Box 2777
Hendersonville, North Carolina 28793
Attention:
Subject:
Gentlemen:
Mr. Mike Bush
Contamination Assessment Activities
General Electric
Hendersonville, North Carolina
Law Engineering Job Number GVE-1841E
Attached, please find our letter reviewing the preliminary
hydrogeological evaluation which was conducted at the GE facility
and the Shepherd property, East Flat Rock, North Carolina. If we
can be of further assistance please notify.
/ww
Very truly yours,
LAW ENGINEERING
'Jt01_½u<J Z lcA-1-0/4~
Thomas L. Lammons
Environmental Services Manager
f/ -c. [,✓, c;[~(/ ~ -f~
jho:as H. Bo~~rd, ✓.G.
Senior Hydrogeologist
/j//2;~~ ~---te;;_ Campbell, P.G., P.H.
V Hydrogeological Consultant
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
D
I
I
I
I
I
I
1.0 INTRODUCTION
Law Engineering was retained by General Electric Corporation (GE) to
conduct an environmental assessment at the Lighting Systems Facility
in East Flat Rock, North Carolina. The assessment has progressed in
phases involving the installation of monitoring wells, bedrock
coring, aquifer tests and ground-water and soil sampling· for
chemical analysis. The presence of chlorinated halocarbon compounds
has been detected in the ground water from monitoring wells on site.
Concentrations of total volatile organic compounds (VOC) in ground
water range from 4014 parts per billion ( ppb) in MW-12A to non-
detected in well MW-21 at the western property boundary.
At GE's request, and under a separate Work Authorization, Law
Engineering conducted site ground-water sampling of twelve (12)
selected residential wells in the vicinity of E.B. Shepherd
property, Oak Grove Road, East Flat Rock, North Carolina. This task
was conducted to assess the potential for ground-water contamination
resulting from buried waste on the Shepherd property. The presence
of tetrachloroethane ( PCA) was detected in ground water in only
three of the wells sampled (WW-9, WW-10, and WW-12). Concentrations
of PCA in the three wells range from 155 ppb in WW-9 and 9 ppb in
WW-10 to 5 ppb in WW-12.
The distribution of contaminant leachate in ground water at these
two sites is largely controlled by the direction of ground water
flow, the configuration of the bedrock surface, and the severity and
orientation of bedrock fractures. As the leachate is carried from
the source in ground water it will become diluted due to a number of
phenomena including filtration, sorption, chemical
microbial degradation, dispersion, time and distance
(dilution).
processes,
of travel
A preliminary evaluation of the leachate movement and distribution
at these two sites is provided in this report. This evaluation is
based on the hydrogeological and analytical data currently
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
m
u
B
m
I
I
I
I
General Electric Light System
Law Engineering Job Number GVE-1841E
July 28, 1989
Page 2
available. It should be noted here that adequate data are
currently lacking for a complete hydrogeological evaluation,
therefore only estimates can be made at this time.
2.0 PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT OF SITE HYDROGEOLOGY AND
CONTAMINANT TRANSPORT
2.1 General Electric Facility
Subsurface geology at the site, as described in the Report of a
Phase IIA Contamination Assessment, Law Engineering, April 13, 1989,
generally consists of two primary units. The first unit consists of
unconsolidated and semi-consolidated materials (fill.soils, alluvial
soils, residual soils and partially weathered rock). The second
unit generally consists of a fractured crystalline bedrock (biotite
gneiss with quartz pegmatite intrusions). Observations made during
rock coring indicated that a number of fractures are present
throughout the bedrock regime at the site.
Hydraulically, the upper soil unit and the lower fractured bedrock
unit appear to be interconnected and function as a single aquifer.
Ground-water (and contaminant leachate) movement in the upper unit
is limited by the permeability (hydraulic conductivity) of the silty
soils. Slug tests indicate a hydraulic conductivity range of 1 x
10-3 to 1 x 10-4 cm/sec in the upper soil zone. The computed
hydraulic gradient at the site ranges from 0.0125 to 0.04 feet/feet
and the effective porosity O .18 to O. 21. The velocity of ground
water flow is expected to be in the range of 50 to 150 feet per
year in the upper soil aquifer. The coefficients of hydraulic
conductivity have not been determined in the bedrock regime. These
data will be collected from aquifer tests scheduled for the next
phase of work (Phase IIIA).
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
General Electric Light System
Law Engineering Job Number GVE-1841E
July 28, 1989
Page 3
The GE plant grounds have significant local contamination in the
soil and more widespread dissolved contamination in the ground
water. The contaminants involved are the typical chlorinated
solvents, e.g. PCE, TCE, and other degraded byproducts.
Most of the contaminants are known as dense non-aqueous phase liquid
(DNAPL) chemicals, which indicate that:
1. the contaminants have a density greater than water,
2. the contaminants are immiscible in water, and
3. the contaminants have low but significant solubilities.
Of special interest is that the .densities of the DNAPL vapors are
also greater than air. These properties allow the contaminant to be
absorbed by the clays of the soil and to travel in the underlying
intervals above the water table. With each recharge event (either
precipitation or intentional. flooding or sprinkling), following each
spill or release over the years, the contaminant moves by gravity
downward into the soil.
If the volume is sufficient, the DNAPL will reach the water table
and continue to migrate downward via the available pore space in the
subsurface soils, and eventually to the fractures in the bedrock
below. Once the primary DNAPL chemicals reach the water table, some
of the material will dissolve and then migrate along with the flow
of the ground water. The vapor generated from the contaminants
present, being heavier than air, will migrate downward through the
unsaturated zone to the water table. Figure 1 illustrates the
distribution of contamination with respect to the bedrock surface.
Based on the data available, preliminary evaluations of the ground-
water flow regime have been made.
hydrogeological cross sections across
Figures 2 and 3 are
the GE facility grounds.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
General Electric Light System
Law Engineering Job Number GVE-1841E
July 28, 1989
Page 4
These preliminary sections clearly indicate that the main
contaminated site (MW-12A) is located in a recharge zone (where the
ground-water flow vector is down relative to a horizontal plane) and
the area along the creek is a ground-water discharge zone, up as far
as MW-14 (where the principal flow vector is up relative to the
horizontal). Figure 4 is a water-table map which illustrates the
ground-water flow direction in the planner view. Figure 5 is a site
plan of the G.E. property with locations of plant facilities and
monitoring wells.
Trace values of VOC's, including DNAPL chemicals, have been detected
in several residential wells along Oak Grove Road, northeast of the
G. E. property ( G. Holbert, E. Goodman, and L. Cannon) . G. E. has
expressed a concern as to the source of this contamination. A
strong case could be made on basic hydrogeological grounds that this
contamination originates along Oak Grove Road and is not related to
G. E. 's on-sight activities. From USGS topographic data, the Oak
Grove Road area in question appears to be located in a recharge area
hydraulically upgradient from the Bat Fork Creek discharge area. It
is unlikely that ground water flow would travel hydraulically
upgradient from the G. E. property to the northeast as far as Oak
Grove Road, unless a deeper flow regime exists in bedrock fractures.
The distribution of contamination at the facility is illustrated in
Figures 6 and 7. Figure 6 is an isopleth map of total volatile
halocarbons at the site. Figure 7 is an illustration of the
distribution of contamination on and off site. Arrows indicate the
direction of ground-water movement across the site, and the probable
direction of ground-water movement from a potential off-site source
northeast of GE property along Oak Grove Road.
The distribution of organic compounds in ground water also suggests
that contamination of the water wells along Oak Grove Road does not
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
General Electric Light System
Law Engineering Job Number GVE-1841E
July 28, 1989
Page 5
originate from a source on GE property. Dispersion of a leachate in
an aquifer causes the concentration of the contaminants to decrease
with increasing length of flow. Concentrations of volatile
contaminants are greater in the off-site wells along Oak Grove Road
than in the down-gradient residential area labeled "RA" on Figure 5.
In addition a zone of uncontaminated wells is located between these
two areas. Again, this would indicate an off-site source for the
contamination northeast of the G.E. property.
Shepherd Property
On June 28, 1989 Law Engineering conducted a ground-water sampling
reconnaissance of residential water supply wells in the vicinity of
the Shepherd property. Analytical results of the twelve (12) wells
sampled, revealed contamination by PCA in three wells. These three
wells are located on the adjacent "Hill" property to the west. All
analytical results are attached. Figure 8 identifies the Shepherd
property, and the location of water supply wells where contamination
by PCA was identified. The other water supply wells included in the
sampling effort are generally located to the east of the shaded area
in Figure 8. Table 1 identifies each property owner involved and
the respective sample station.
The occurrence and movement of ground water at this site is by
analogy assumed to be similar to that of the GE facility, although
no monitoring wells or soil test borings have been installed to
date. A preliminary evaluation of the surface topography and
drainage has been conducted. Also a preliminary fracture trace
analysis of this area has been conducted to identify possible joint
systems in the bedrock where preferred subsurface flow of ground
water and contamination might occur. Figure 9 is a USGS topographic
quadrangle map showing selected fracture traces.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
General Electric Light System Law Engineering Job Number GVE-1841E
July 28, 1989
Page 6
Based on the limited data available, the following opinions are
presented at this time:
The Shepherd property source of contamination could be
located on a water-table divide. If this is the case, flow
could occur in any direction from the south.
The potential for bedrock fractures in this area exists. If
significant fractures exist in the bedrock beneath this
site, ground water and contamination could flow to the east
causing contamination of these residential water supplies.
Any other statements concerning dispersion or dilution away
from this source would be speculative at this time.
SUMMARY
I A preliminary evaluation of the hydrogeology and contamination
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
dispersion was conducted for two areas of interest.
are:
These areas
l.
2.
General Electric facility site, East Flat Rock, North
Carolina.
Shepherd property vicinity, East Flat Rock, North Carolina.
The opinions stated in this report are based on a limited data
base.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
General Electric Light System
Law Engineering Job Number GVE-1841E July 28, 1989
Page 7
The following opinions are postulated:
GE Plant Site
Residential wells along Oak Grove Road, northeast of the GE
facility (e.g. L. Cannon, G. Holbert, E. Goodman) appear to
be hydraulically upgradient of the primary ground-water
discharge area for the GE facility.
It is unlikely that contamination of the ground water in
these residential wells could originate from the plant
property, unless contaminant dispersion is affected by a
deeper flow occurring in bedrock fractures. This condition
could be better evaluated after an aquifer pumping test is
performed.
The distribution of voe contamination in the residential
water supply wells northeast of the GE property suggests
that an off-site source is involved (e.g. buried drums,
dumping sites, etc.).
Shepherd Property
Based on analytic.al data and in inferences obtained from
USGS topographic maps it appears that potentially
contaminated ground water from the Shepherd property could
flow in any direction from the south.
The potential for bedrock joint systems could allow for
preferred deep bedrock flow, and contaminant transport, to
the east Shepherd property.
I
I
I Station
WW-1 I WW-2
WW-3
WW-4
I WW-5
WW-6
WW-7
I WW-8
WW-9
WW-10
I WW-11
WW-12
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I.D.
RESIDENTIAL GROUND-WATER SAMPLING
EAST FLAT ROCK, NORTH CAROLINA
June 28, 1989
Property Owner
Jess R. Harris.
John N. Camp-
Roy H. Melton.
Odell Edney
Otto c. Banks
Thomas A. Dupont
N/A
Ernest H. Russell
Hill residence
Hill slaughter house
Hill Property (Raglin
renter)
Maybin Hill
VOLATILE HALOCARBON AND TOP OF ROCK CONTOUR MAP
SCALE 1 :400
THt l'l:INT MACHINE,INC. Nfl.00
□ GR£AT£K THAI\J SO U6/ L
[tj GREATER 7/fAAJ ZOO UG/ L
AI0TE _-CIJIJTOLIR £.LEVAT/0.V £.QUAL::S
£L~VATIOJJ .SHOWJJ {FE:E.T1 M~L)
PLUS ZODO FT.
VOLATILE. HALOCARl!IJAJ
l:JOPLETH
JOB NO.
LAW ENGINEERING
GREENVILLE, SOUTH CAROLINA
GROUA/D WATER CONTAMIAJA T/OAJ
AAJD BE"DROCIC ..SlllfFAt:£
G, £. P'LAAIT
EA.ST FLAT ROCK AIIJHTJI CAJO,L/NA
FIGURE f
I
I
I
I
1:
I
I
I
I
ii
fl
rl I .
:I
I
:1
I
I
I
CU:YATIIII
(ITIT, IISl)
2180.00
2160.00
2140.00
2120.00
2100.00
2080.00
NW-18
Nlf-25 ~ .. ~ptt1 ::_.J,.,-sul<fACE 10PU0""
□ ·I
G]
·~
II
I
§
-.
All
BT
IIW-8
1/
-
-PILL
-ALLUVIUM
-SILT WITH VARYI
-SAND VITB VARYI
-PARTIALLY "IIEI\TB
-ROClt
-SCREEJIED IIITKRV,"
-GROOllD-lfATER LE'
-POWER AOGKR REJ'I
-BORING TERM.INATI
*NOTE: NW-8 ONCAf
I
I
-~
~
' ' j
·1
rl
I
' ' ' ' ,
~ ~•
WYATICII
(FE£T.
2200.00
2180.00
2160.00
2140.00
2120.00
2100.00
2080.00
2060.00
Nlf-19
MW-26 SURFACE TUPUGRAPHY
'v
NW-11
-
□ -FILL
■ -ALLUVIUM
[ill -SILT WlTB
~ -SAND WITB • -PARTIALLY
■ -ROClt
~ -SCREENED I"
-GROUKD-11A T
AR -POWER AOGE
BT -BORING TERJ
-------------------GROUND-WATER CONTOUR MAP
24
T.-...... , MN:.HlNf,INC. N~.ix>
(7)
0
-26 $
MW-2 e
MW-2 e
SCALE 1 :400
M
MW-27 e
23
/l/OrE:: GKIJLJJ.JD -I\IAT£R COJ.JTOt/K
£LE:VATIIJN E:qUAL.S. £LcVAT/0AJ
SHOWA.I (F££T, M.SL) PLLJS 2100.
JOB NO.
LAW ENGINEERING
GREENVILLE,SOUTH CAROLINA
G.. E. PLANT
£AST FLAT ROCK, AJORTH CAIOLIAJA
FIGURE 4
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -·-
lllftencan blf.leprinl 307lU
,.
Eo
~ !o Jo ~1·
--, -✓
, ,
1------------------,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
VOLATILE HALOCARBON ISOPLETH MAP
MWiJ22A
R
~ -'o "'~
MW-
M 2
~
NOTIS:
I. COIITOOR I IITTRY AL IN Ml GR061W1S PER LI TIR
BASED Ill TOTAL VOLATILE tw.OCARBONS FR!JI
EPA IETltOOS 8010 OR 601.
MW-14 a
':>o
5
0 --3
0 0
W-2 e
SCALE 1 :400
~ LAW ENGINEERING 2. MAP BASED Ill AIIAI.YSIS OF SAMPLES 08TAINEO
FRIJI MARCH 1988 THROUQI MARCH 1989.
J, COIITOUIIS ClJl'\ITIR 6EIIERATID USING 'SURFER". ~ GREENVILLE,SOUTH CAROLINA
G.E. PLAAJT
CA:; T rt.AT lrOCK 1 AJIJRTH C,Hl/'/JL/1.JA
I t"I! JIIINT MACI-IINE,INC.
JOB NO. FIGURE'
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
VULATILE HALUCAKBUN
ISVPLETH
CllCTAMI NA Tl UN
NUT DETECTED
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
YEAR
195 6
TO
196 2
1%2
TO
196
l 96S
THRU
1967
1968
THRU
1970
1955 -1970 DISPOSAL HISTORY
TRANSPORTER DISPOSAL LOCATION, ETC.
SHEPHERD HENDERSON COUNTY LANDFILL, WHICH AT THIS TIME WAS
IN THE AREA OF THE CITY PARK.
SHEPHERD SHEPHERD PROPERTY ON ROPER ROAD.
STERNBURG DISPOSAL LOCATION IS UNKNOWN, STERNBURG WAS FROM
ASHEVILLE.
SHEPHERD SHEPHERD PROPERTY ON ROPER ROAD.
SHEPHERD FAINS DUMP, A LOT THAT MR. SHEPHERD LEASED NORTH
OF HEtJDERSONVILLE OFF HIGHWAY 25.
PER t1P.. SHEPHERD, OCTOBER, 1970 WAS THE LAST DATE OF BUSitlESS WITH GE.
I
D
D
---~J· ·-,, M s~i· -'
'
-~\ \ ~
. . <""/"
'
\-...!.•" e o-.........._ • ✓ • 0 ' .
-,-
/ / -. / . 9+ l -1' ,,
-7/)-' ~\
~ .
\
m :-../ I,: : 'i~--\. ! , •• ;
I -
' -, I\ \ )
,..--.:.,\\ ' I ,..::, . \ . -, l
' -
.;:::-=:~. '~. \,• ..... ,\. . •\\ . · ... /.'.• . I ·.y. (·,
",,/ o .Cl ,i • . • . .... I 1,,-_ .. • .,. : ; 1/ • ~re~.~.""'.~•""'°'<:-I
'
I
i
'~..-;·•.,
,, . -I , -.\· \ . .:.l!::\:♦1:~-~-{~-. ~;· I I O ~~
·• .. •.ii~ {:'.~ ·. '~;1,~: t;';-,}
r·. := =-~ . ~ :~~-. -,._.
~-,
11 _" ',-u', I j· -R k --11 • , /
M ~tg) f:,,,:,,),''-'."--\
~?ON "1° -\ ' /' '
I ·/ ) ·.~ "7--... ___ j ' •'>• \ '• • 1 • \ ~. ,,. '. ( ... ,
o-\:-'·'
' \ ·,
\
1_r!"'" . .',., ___ )
.
' ---~Jr~~ . :...._
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
BAT FORK CREEK
GE PROPERTY
~'.AP LEGEND
SCALE 3/4'' • 1000'
STREAM DISCHARGE TO BAT FCRK CREEK FROM GE
l) SHEPHERD PRCPERTY/RESIDEHCE
-TARGET OF STATE SUPERFUIJD ItJVESTIGATIOII
-LCCATIOH OF rEPO~TED DISPOSAL AREA
2) HILL RESIDENCE, DUG WELL, PCE • 193ppb, TRICHLORO • trace
3) RAGLAND RESIDEIJCE, DUG \JELL, PCE • 237ppb
-REQUESTED THAT GE MOYE HEP. AND HER FAMILY.
4) I\AYBIN RESIDENCE, DEEP WELL, PCE • 5 ppb
----------CREEK SEDIMENT----------
S) UPSrnEAr,i SAMPLE LOCATIOI,, PCB(l234) • 40Cppb
-SMALL STREAM EJJTERS BAT FORK CREEK FROl1 GE YACAIJT LOT
6) NPDES DISCHARGE
7) DISCHARGE SAMPLE LOCATIOH, PCB(l248) • l40ppb
-THIS WAS THE SAIIPLE J,E SPLIT AIJD AI/ALYZED, OUR RESULT I/AS l!Of/ DETECTED
OUR DETECTIOIJ LIMIT WAS l OOppb.
8) DOWI/STREAII SAl1PLE LOCATION, PCB ( 1243) • Ji OOppb, PCB ( 1260) • 5 90ppb,
PCB(TOTAL) • 409Cppb
-DUKE PCWER SUBSTAT!Otl AND OUR DErlOLITION LAI/DFILL DRAIN ItJTO THIS AREA.
9) DEr10LITJOIJ LAIJDFILL
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
D
D
I
I
I
I
1 I e
101
~ --= .. . .. -
...... ~ ~---I/,-_'
(. ~
•
0
• • • • • • • •
• • • • • I •
•
••
A.JOT TO SCALE:..
THC l'IINT ""'-'CHINf,INC.
/.I/LL Pli'IJP£RTY
a,.,,IJIIJJO KJAT£Jl CIJAJTAMIA/ATIIJAJ
PCJT£1.JTIAL FL OW lrOI.ITE FDlt
GNOLJ,VD WAT£R' Ct:WTAMIA/ATIIJJJ
""'""'
--,. . ,
~· \ I ,,• '. I ~' '-· ❖
··-r··k··· /· .. &.1---.c ~----:::. :. -
'
•
LAW ENGINEERING
GREENVILLE,SOUTH CAROLINA
.SHEPHE/lfl'D PROP£1i'TT .SIT£
£HT FLAT HIJC.KJ AIIJRTJI CAHtJLINA
JOB NO. FIGURE 8
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
g
0
u
I
I
I
I
,, . .,,..
,, -,/' ,, ,,
.• ",: ". '·=•0...,-\ ·.)
-'( -
.:: • --✓-· .l. --
HU PllNT MACHINl,INC.
_ 11 n
--;=. ~
-:::. z-:ic-J -
,-,; ::;.,-·-_,.
·:::::: ...... '·•
TRACE. LIAJE.AMEAJT.5
, .. " 24000~
\ "-'""~""';;-,-~ -;"? , ,,,-J ,,_ --\ (,-.::::~ '
\ ""-......_; ' ' \ ? • '•"--= " >_-:-
' ~~. --_-:_' , , .
'?);-!'
I '\ \ ' 1,~,,)2
"-' (
·:...:-_··
~-~~
-~ {
2
,~;-;:; r -(
·j ~~ . . .
,J .
'I 't;, .·
~--..n
LAW ENGINEERING
GREENVILLE,SOUTH CAROLINA
..S:El.EC TED FRACT//RE TRAC£ LIIJE:AME.A.JT S
£AST FLAT ROCI:', A/ORT/I CAROL/A/A
JOB NO, FIGURE "I
I
Page
I
I
I
I
I
I
07/20/89
1
LAW ENVIRONMENTAL NATIONAL LABORATORIES
TEST DATA REPORT
Lab Number
Project No.
---Project Infonaation
89-3820-12
OVE-2231
Project Name SHEPHERD PROPERTY
Manager: GLENN SOFGE
Station ID WW-12
Matrix W ·
Type GRAB
Collector GS
Remarks
Cust. No.
Sample Information ---
Sampled Date/Tiae
Received Date/Time
Received From/By
Chain of Custody
Number of Containers
---Test Data ---
06/28/89 16:50
06/30/89 10:15
GS/CLM
6980
3
'arameter .............................. Method ...• Uni ts Det. Liai t Results ... Test Date Analy I ORGANICS PREP RESULTS --voe SCREENING N/A 07/03/89 JAS I RGANIC ANALYSIS RESULTS
omodichloromethane EPA 601 ug/1 1.0 ND 07/03/89 KD
·omoform EPA 601 ug/1 2.0 ND 07/03/89 KD
Eomethane EPA 601 ug/1 12 ND 07/03/89 KD
bon tetrachloride EPA 601 ug/1 1.2 ND 07/03/89 KD
roethane EPA 601 ug/1 5.2 ND 07/03/89 KD
2-Chloroethylvinyl ether EPA 601 ug/1 1.3 ND 07/03/89 KD
ltloroform EPA 601 ug/1 0.5 ND 07/03/89 KD
loromethane EPA 601 ug/1 0.8 ND 07/03/89 KD
Dibromochloromethane EPA 601 ug/1 0.9 ND 07/03/89 KD
p2-Dichlorobenzene EPA 601 ug/1 1.5 ND 07/03/89 KD
3-Dichlorobenzene EPA 601 ug/1 3.2 ND 07/03/89 KD
,4-Dichlorobenzene EPA 601 ug/1 2.4 ND 07/03/89 KD
lchlorodifluoromethane EPA 601 ug/1 18 ND 07/03/89 KD
1-Dichloroethane EPA 601 ug/1 0.7 ND 07/03/89 KD
.,2 Dichloroethane EPA 601 ug/1 0.3 ND 07/03/89 KD
1,1-Dichloroethene EPA 601 ug/1 1.3 ND 07/03/89 KD
.. ans-1,2-Dichloroethene EPA601 ug/1 1.0 ND 07/03/89 KD
2-Dichloropropane EPA 601 ug/1 o.4 ND 07/03/89 KD
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene EPA 601 ug/1 3.4 ND 07/03/89 KD
,ans-1,3-Dichloropropene EPA 601 ug/1 3.4 ND 07/03/89 KD
thylene Chloride EPA 601 ug/1 2.5 ND 07/03/89 KD
,l,2,2-Tetrachloroethane EPA 601 ug/1 0.3 ND 07/03/89 KD
Tetrachloroethene EPA 601 ug/1 0.3 5.3 07/03/89 KD 11, 1-Trichloroethane EPA 601 ug/1 0.3 ND 07/03/89 KD
'.2-Trichloroethane EPA 601 ug/1 0.2 ND 07/03/89 KD
I ~-?>t~d I Signed
lte
Page
I
I
I
I
I
I
07/20/89
1
Lab Number
Project No.
Project Na.me
LAW ENVIRONMENTAL NATIONAL LABORATORIES
TEST DATA REPORT
---Project Information
89-3820-10
GVE-2231
SHEPHERD PROPERTY
Cust. No.
Manager: GLENN SOFOE
Station ID
Matrix
Type
Collector
Remarks
WW-10
w
GRAB
GS
---Sample Information ---
Sampled Date/Time
Received Date/Time
Received Froa/By
Chain of Custody
Number of Containers
---Test Data ---
06/28/89 16:00
06/30/89 10: 15
GS/CLM
6980
3
'arameter .......................•...... Method .... Units Det. Limit Results ... Test Date Ane.ly
l ORGANICS PREP RESULTS --
VOC SCREENING
■ )RGANIC ANALYSIS RESULTS
a,o.ooichloromethane
!'OIIOform
·-omomethane I ~bon tetrachloride
-~oroethane
_-Chloroethylvinyl ether
lliloroform
ll,.loromethane
Dibromochloromethane
'-
2-Dichlorobenzene
3-Dichlorobenzene
,4-Dichlorobenzene
lchlorodifluoromethane
1-Dichloroethane
,2 Dichloroethane
1,1-Dichloroethene
D·ans-1,2-Dichloroethene
2-Dichloropropane
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
Bans-1,3-Dichloropropene
thylene Chloride
,l,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
Tetrachloroethene 0 l, 1-Trichloroethane IJ• .2-Trichloroethane
I
EPA 601
EPA 601
EPA 601
EPA 601
EPA 601
EPA 601
EPA 601
EPA 601
EPA 601
EPA 601
EPA 601
EPA 601
EPA 601
EPA 601
EPA 601
EPA 601
EPA 601
EPA 601
EPA 601
EPA 601
EPA 601
EPA 601
EPA 601
EPA 601
EPA 601
ug/1 1.0
ug/1 2.0
ug/1 12
ug/1 1.2
ug/1 5.2
ug/1 1.3
ug/1 0.5
ug/1 0.8
ug/1 0.9
ug/1 1.5
ug/1 3.2
ug/1 2.4
ug/1 18
ug/1 0. 7
ug/1 0.3
ug/1 1.3
ug/1 1.0
ug/1_ o.4
ug/1 3.4
ug/1 3.4
ug/1 2.5
ug/1 0.3
ug/1 0.3
ug/1 0.3
ug/1 0.2
Signed
N/A 07/03/89 JAS
ND (JJ/03/89 KD
ND (JJ/03/89 KD
ND (JJ/03/89 KD
ND (JJ/03/89 KD
ND 07/03/89 KD
ND 07/03/89 KD
ND 07/03/89 KD
ND (JJ/03/89 KD
ND 07 /03/89 KD
ND (JJ/03/89 KD
ND 07/03/89 KD
ND 07/03/89 KD
ND 07/03/89 KD
ND 07/03/89 KD
ND 07/03/89 KD
ND 07/03/89 KD
ND (JJ/03/89 KD
ND 07/03/89 KD
ND 07/03/89 KD
ND 07/03/89 KD
ND 07/03/89 KD
ND 07/03/89 KD
8.7 07/03/89 KD
ND 07/03/89 KD
ND 07/03/89 KD
,1!;,.-,,,{?J
late
Page
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
07/20/89
1
Lab NUlllber
Project No.
Project Name
89-3820-09
GVE-2231
LAW ENVIRONMENTAL NATIONAL LABORATORIES TEST DATA REPORT
---Project Information
Cust. No. SHEPHERD PROPERTY
Manager: GLENN SOFGE
Station ID
Matrix
Type
Collector
Remarks
WW-9
w
GRAB
GS
Sample Information ---
Sampled Date/Time
Received Date/Time
Received From/By
Chain of Custody
Number of Containers
---Test Data ---
06/28/89 15:50
06/30/89 10:15
GS/CLM
6980
3
Parameter ................•............. Method . . . . Uni ts Det. Li.mi t Results ... Test Date Analy I ORGANICS PREP RESULTS --voe SCREENING N/A 07/03/89 JAS
l;RGANIC ANALYSIS RESULTS odichloromethane FJ>A 601 ug/1 1.0 ND 07/11/89 KD Bromororm FJ>A 601 ug/1 2.0 ND 07/11/89 KD r:omethane FJ>A 601 ug/1 12 ND 07/11/89 KD bon tetrachloride FJ>A 601 ug/1 1.2 ND 07/11/89 KD oroethane EPA 601 ug/1 5,2 ND 07/11/89 KD lhloroethylvinyl ether EPA 601 ug/1 1.3 ND 07 /11/89 KD oroform EPA 601 ug/1 0.5 ND 07/11/89 KD oromethane EPA 601 ug/1 0.8 ND 07/11/89 KD ibromochloromethane FJ>A 601 ug/1 0.9 ND 07/11/89 KD 11-Dichlorobenzene FJ>A 601 ug/1 1.5 ND 07/11/89 KD 1 -Dichlorobenzene EPA 601 ug/1 3,2 ND 07/11/89 KD 1,4-Dichlorobenzene EPA 601 ug/1 2.4 ND 07/11/89 KD D-hlorodifluoromethane EPA 601 ug/1 18 ND 07 /11/89 KD 1 -Dichloroethane EPA 601 ug/1 0.7 ND 07/11/89 KD 1 , . Dichloroethane EPA 601 ug/1 0.3 ND 07/11/89 KD 1 1-Dichloroethene EPA 601 ug/1 1.3 ND 07/11/89 KD Tt-s-1,2-Dichloroethene EPA 601 ug/1 1.0 ND 07/11/89 KD 1 -Dichloropropane EPA 601 ug/1 0.4 ND 07/11/89 KD cis-1,3-Dichloropropene EPA 601 ug/1 3.4 ND 07/11/89 KD rf,-1,3-Dichloropropene EPA 601 ug/1 3,4 ND 07 /11/89 KD M hylene Chloride FJ>A 601 ug/1 2.5 ND 07/11/89 KO 1, ,2,2-Tetrachloroethane' EPA 601 ug/1 0.3 ND 07/11/89 KO Tlrachloroethene EPA 601 ug/1 0.3 155 07/11/89 KO 1 ,1-Trichloroethane EPA 601 ug/1 0.3 ND 07/11/89 KO l 2-Trichloroethane EPA 601 ug/1 0.2 ND 07/11/89 KD
I ~~d I Signed
late 07 /20/89
Page 2
I ,ab Numbet'
rroject No.
I
89-3820-09
OVE-2231
LAW ENVIRONMENTAL NATIONAL LABORATORIES
TE.ST DATA REPORT
---Test Data ----~==:~. ~~~~~. ~~~. ~~ ........ . Method .... Units Det. Limit Results ..•
Tt'ichloI'Oe thene
lt'ichlorofluoromethane
inyl Chlot'ide
Benzene
1-:;hlorobenzene
thylbenzene
.oluene
Xylenes
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
B
D
D
I
EPA 601
EPA 601
EPA 601
EPA 602
EPA 602
EPA 602
EPA 602
EPA 602
ug/1 . 1.2 ND
ug/1 3.2 ND
ug/1 1.8 ND
ug/1 1.0 ND
ug/1 1.0 ND
ug/1 1.0 ND
ug/1 1.0 ND
ug/1 2.0 ND
Signed
Test Date Analy
07/11/89 KD
07/11/89 KD
07/11/89 !CD
07 /11/89 KD
07/11/89 KD
07/11/89 KD
07 /11/89 KD
07/11/89 KD
~ate 07/20/89
Page 2
I ',ab Number
,roject No.
I
89-3820-03
GVE-2231
LAW ENVIRONMENTAL NATIONAL LABORATORIES
TEST DATA RFPORT
---Test Date ---
i~:::~-~~~~~-~~~-~~---------Method----Units Det-Limit Results---
Trichloroe thene
11:'richlorofluoromethene
a,1ny1 Chloride
Benzene
IChlorobenzene
,thylbenzene
':,luene
IXylenes
I
I
I
I
I
n
D
I
I
I
I
I
EPA 601
EPA 601
EPA 601
EPA 602
EPA 602
EPA 602
EPA 602
EPA 602
ug/1 1.2 ND
ug/1 3.2 ND
ug/1 1.8 ND
ug/1 1.0 ND
ug/1 1.0 ND
ug/1 1.0 ND
ug/1 1.0 ND
ug/1 2.0 ND
Signed
Test Date Analy
07/03/89 KD
07/03/89 KD
07/03/89 KD
07/03/89 KD
07/03/89 KD
07/03/.89 KD
07/03/89 KD
07/03/89 KD
-ate
Page
I
I
I
I
I
I
07/20/89
1
Lab Number
Project No.
Project Name
LAW ENVIRONMENTAL NATIONAL LABORATORIES
TEST DATA REPORT
---Project Information
89-3820-04
OVE-2231
SHEPHERD PROPERTY Cust. No.
Manager: GLENN SOFGE
Station ID
Matrix
Type
Collector
Remarks
ww-4
w
GRAB
GS
---Sample Information ---
Sampled Date/Time
Received Date/Time
Received Froa/By
Chain of Custody
Number of Containers
---Test Data ---
06/28/89 11 :05
06/30/89 10: 15
GS/CLM
6980
3
'arameter ...•........•.........•....... Method .... Units Det. Limit Results ... Test Date Analy
11-ORGANICS PREP RESULTS --~ voe SCREENING
II ORGANIC ANALYSIS RESULTS
llromodichloromethane
Bromoform
E methane
bon tetrachloride
roethane tChloroethylvinyl ether
loroform
loromethane
ibromochloromethane
D' 2-Dichlorobenzene
,3-Dichlorobenzene
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
f:chlorodifluoromethane
1-Dichloroethane
,2 Dichloroethane
1,1-Dichloroethene
ltans-1,2-Dichloroethene
2-Dichloropropane
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
J.ans-1,3-Dichloropropene
thylene Chloride
,l,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
ltrachloroethene
1,1-Trichloroethane
. ',2-Trichloroethane
I
I
EPA 601 ug/1
EPA 601 ug/1
EPA 601 ug/1
EPA 601 ug/1
EPA 601 ug/1
EPA 601 ug/1
EPA 601 ug/1
EPA 601 ug/1
EPA 601 ug/1
EPA 601 ug/1
EPA 601 ug/1
EPA 601 ug/1
EPA 601 ug/1
EPA 601 ug/1
EPA 601 ug/1
EPA 601 ug/1
EPA 601 ug/1
EPA 601 ug/1
EPA 601 ug/1
EPA 601 ug/1
EPA 601 ug/1
EPA 601 ug/1
EPA 601 ug/1
EPA 601 ug/1
EPA 601 ug/1
Signed
N/A 07/03/89 JAS
1.0 ND 07/03/89 KD 2.0 ND 07/03/89 KD 12 ND 07/03/89 KD 1.2 ND 07/03/89 KD 5.2 ND 07/03/89 KD
1.3 ND 07/03/89 KD 0.5 ND 07/03/89 KD 0.8 ND 07/03/89 KD 0.9 ND 07/03/89 KD 1.5 ND 07/03/89 KD 3.2 ND 07/03/89 KD 2.4 ND 07/03/89 KD 18 ND 07/03/89 KD
0.7 ND 07/03/89 KD
0.3 ND 07/03/89 KD 1.3 ND 07/03/89 KD 1.0 ND 07/03/89 KD 0.4 ND 07/03/89 KD 3.4 ND 07/03/89 KD 3.4 ND 07/03/89 KD 2.5 ND 07/03/89 KD 0.3 ND 07/03/89 KD 0.3 ND 07/03/89 KD 0.3 ND 07/03/89 KD 0.2 ND 07/03/89 KD
'ate 07/20/89
Page 2
I ab Number
1-'roject No.
I
89-3820-04
GVE-2231
LAW ENVIRONMENTAL NATIONAL LABORATORIES TEST DATA REPORT
---Test Data ---
-~:::~-~~~~~~-:~~-~~········· Method .•.. Units Det. Limit Results ...
Trichloroethene
lrichlorofluoromethane
inyl Chloride
Benzene
!llihlorobenzene
lthylbenzene
1luene ·
(lenes
I
I
a
I
D
m
I
I
I
I
I
I
EPA 601
EPA 601
EPA 601
EPA 602
EPA 602
EPA 602
EPA 602
EPA 602
ug/1 1.2 ND
ug/1 3.2 ND
ug/1 1.8 ND
ug/1 1.0 ND
ug/1 1.0 ND
ug/1 1.0 ND
ug/1 1.0 ND
ug/1 2.0 ND
Signed
Test Date Analy
07/03/89 KD
07/03/89 KD
07/03/89 KD
07/03/89 KD
07/03/89 KD
07/03/89 KD
07/03/89 KD
, 07/03/89 KD
I Date
'age
I
I
I
I
I
I
07/20/89
1
Lab Number
Project No.
Project Name
LAW ENVIRONMENTAL NATIONAL LABORATORIES
TEST DATA REPORT
---Project Information
89-3820-05
GVE-2231
SHEPHERD PROPERTY
Cust. No.
Manager: GLENN SOFGE
Station ID WW-5
Matrix W
Type GRAB
Collector GS
Remarks
---Sample Information ---
Sampled Date/Time
Received Date/Time
Received From/By
Chain of Custody
Number of Containers
---Test Data ---
06/28/89 11:40
06/30/89 10: 15
GS/CLM
6980
3
Parameter. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Method. . . . Uni ts Det. Limit Results ... Test Date Analy
II--ORGANICS PREP RESULTS --
GC VOC SCREENING
l ORGANIC ANALYSIS RESULTS
romodichloromethane
Bromofora
ll5romomethane
IICarbon tetrachloride
Chloroethane
ether 02-Chloroethylvinyl
Chloroform
Chloromethane
Dibromochloromethane
11,2-Dichlorobenzene
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
IJDichlorodifluoromethane
111,1-Dichloroethane
1,2 Dichloroethane
1,1-Dichloroethene
frans-1,2-Dichloroethene
1,2-Dichloropropane
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
ITrans-1,3-Dichloropropene ■Methylene Chloride
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
ITetrachloroethene
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
'.,2-Trichloroethane
I
I
EPA 601
EPA 601
EPA 601
EPA 601
EPA 601
EPA 601
EPA 601
EPA 601
EPA 601
EPA 601
EPA 601
EPA 601
EPA 601
EPA 601
EPA 601
EPA 601
EPA 601
EPA 601
EPA 601
EPA 601
EPA 601
EPA 601
EPA 601
EPA 601
EPA 601
ug/1 1.0
ug/1 2.0
ug/1 12
ug/1 1.2
ug/1 5.2
ug/1 1.3
ug/1 0.5
ug/1 0.8
ug/1 0.9
ug/1 1.5
ug/1 3.2
ug/1 2.4
ug/1 18
ug/1 0.7
ug/1 0.3
ug/1 1.3
ug/1 1.0
ug/1 0.4
ug/1 3.4
ug/1 3.4
ug/1 2.5
ug/1 0.3
ug/1 0.3
ug/1 0.3
ug/1 0.2
Signed
N/A 07 /03/89 JAS
ND 07/03/89 KD
ND 07/03/89 KO
ND 07/03/89 KD
ND 07/03/89 KO
ND 07/03/89 KO
ND 07/03/89 KO
ND 07 /03/89 KO
ND 07/03/89 KO
ND 07/03/89 KO
ND 07/03/89 KO
ND 07/03/89 KO
ND 07/03/89 KO
ND 07 /03/89 KO
ND 07/03/89 KO
ND 07 /03/89 KO
ND 07/03/89 KO
ND 07/03/89 KO
ND 07/03/89 KO
ND 07/03/89 KO
ND 07/03/89 KO
ND 07/03/89 KO
ND 07/03/89 KO
ND 07/03/89 KO
ND 07/03/89 KO
ND 07/03/89 KD
I
,wzene
i9ene
~ 91
I
I
a
0
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
89-3820-05
GVE-2231
LAW ENVIRONMENTAL NATIONAL LABORATORIES
TEST DATA REPORT
---Test Data ---
Method ...• Units Det. Limit Results ...
EPA 6ol ug/1 1.2 ND EPA 6ol ug/1 3.2 ND EPA 6ol ug/1 1.8 ND EPA 6o2 ug/1 1.0 ND EPA 6o2 ug/1 1.0 ND EPA 602 ug/1 1.0 ND EPA 602 ug/1· 1.0 ND EPA 6o2 ug/1 2.0 ND
Signed
Test Date Analy
07/03/89 KD
07/03/89 KD
07/03/89 KD
07/03/89 KD
07/03/89 KD
07/03/89 KD
07/03/89 KD
07/03/89 KD
10
15
naly
AS
ID
ill
io
:0
:0
;n
;n
tD
tD
tD
tD
tn
[D
[D
SH
~H
SH
SH
BH SH
BH
BH
BH
BH
BH
late 07/20/89
Page 2 I -ib Number 89-3820-06
--~Ject No. GVE-2231
I
LAW ENVIRONMENTAL NATIONAL LABORATORIES
TEST DATA REPORT
---Test Data ---
,~:::::~-~~~~~~-~~~-~~········· Method ••.. Units Det. Limit Results ...
Trichloroethene
l richlorofluoromethane
inyl Chloride
Benzene
l~hlorobenzene
:hylbenzene
)luene
;lenes
I
I
I
I
m
D
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
EPA 601
FPA 601
EPA 601
EPA 6o2
EPA 602
EPA 602
FPA 602
EPA 6o2
ug/1 1.2 ND
ug/1 3.2 ND
ug/1 1.8 ND
ug/1 1.0 ND
ug/1 1.0 ND
ug/1 1.0 ND
ug/1 1.0 ND
ug/1 2.0 ND
Signed
Test Date Analy
07/03/89 BH
07/03/89 BH
07/03/89 BH
07/03/89 BH
07/03/89 BH
07/03/89 BH
07/03/89 BH
07/03/89 BH
lte
Page
I
I
I
I
I
I
07/20/89
1
Lab Number
Project No.
Project Name
89-3820-07
GVE-2231
LAW ENVIRONMENTAL NATIONAL LABORATORIES
TEST DATA REPORT
---Project Information ---
Cust. No. SHEPHERD PROPERTY
Manager: GLENN SOFGE
Station ID
Matrix
Type
Collector
Remarks
WW-7 w
GRAB
GS
Sallple Information ---
Sampled Date/Time
Received Date/Time
Received From/By
Chain or Custody
Number or Containers
---Test Data·---
06/28/89 11:55
06/30/89 10: 15
GS/CLM
6980
3
'ara.meter .............................• Method . . . . Uni ts Det. Liai t Results ... Test Date Analy I ORGANICS PREP RESULTS --voe SCREENING N/A 07/03/89 JAS
~RGANIC ANALYSIS RK5ULTS odichloromethane EPA 601 ug/1 1.0 ND 07/03/89 KO ,-oaoform EPA 601 ug/1 2.0 ND 07/03/89 KO i·011omethane EPA 601 ug/1 12 ND 07/03/89 KO rbon tetrachloride EPA 601 ug/1 1.2 ND 07/03/89 KO loroethane EPA 601 ug/1 5,2 ND 07/03/89 KO -Chloroethylvinyl ether EPA 601 ug/1 1.3 ND 07/03/89 KO lloroform EPA 601 ug/1 0.5 ND 07/03/89 KO loromethane EPA 601 ug/1 0.8 ND 07/03/89 KO Dibromochloromethane EPA 601 ug/1 0.9 ND 07/03/89 KO 12-Dichlorobenzene EPA 601 ug/1 1.5 ND 07/03/89 KO 3-Dichlorobenzene EPA 601 ug/1 3.2 ND 07/03/89 KO 1,4-Dichlorobenzene EPA 601 ug/1 2.4 ND 07/03/89 KO lhlorodifluoromethane EPA 601 ug/1 18 ND 07/03/89 KO -Dichloroethane EPA 601 ug/1 0.7 ND 07/03/89 KO ,2 Dichloroethane EPA 601 ug/1 0.3 ND 07/03/89 KO 1,1-Dichloroethene EPA 601 ug/1 1.3 ND 07/03/89 KO ~-1,2-Dichloroethene EPA 601 ug/1 1.0 ND 07/03/89 KO Dichloropropane EPA 601 ug/1 o.4 ND 07/03/89 KO cis-1,3-Dichloropropene EPA 601 ug/1 3.4 ND 07/03/89 KO ~-1,3-Dichloropropene EPA 601 ug/1 3.4 ND 07/03/89 KO ylene Chloride EPA 601 ug/1 2.5 ND 07/03/89 KO , , ,2-Tetrachloroethane EPA 601 ug/1 0.3 ND 07/03/89 KO Tlrachloroethene EPA 601 ug/1 0.3 ND 07/03/89 KO 1 ,1-Trichloroethane EPA 601 ug/1 0.3 ND 07/03/89 KO 1. 2-Trichloroethane EPA 601 ug/1 0.2 ND 07/03/89 KO
I C'/2.,<d I Signed
lte 07/20/89
Page 2 I ab Number
, roject No.
I
89-3820-07
GVE-2231
LAW ENVIRONMENTAL NATIONAL LABORATORIES
TFST DATA REPORT
---Test Data ---
rr:::~-~~~~~~-~~~-~~········· Method .•.• Units Det. Lai t Results ...
Trichloroethene
ltichlorofluoromethane
~l Chloride
Benzene
-
lorobenzene
hylbenzene
luene
flenes
I
I
I
•
I
I
I
D
D
u
m
I
EPA 6o1
EPA 6o1
EPA 6o1
EPA 602
EPA 602
EPA 6o2
EPA 6o2
EPA 6o2
ug/1 1.2 ND
ug/1 3.2 ND
ug/1 1.8 ND
ug/1 1.0 ND
ug/1 1.0 ND
ug/1 1.0 ND
ug/1 1.0 ND
ug/1 2.0 ND
Signed
Test Date Analy
07/03/89 KD
07/03/89 KD
07/03/89 KD
07/03/89 KD
07/03/89 KD
07/03/89 KD
07/03/89 KD
07/03/89 KD
late
Page
I
I
I
I
I
I
07/20/89
1
Lab Number
Project No.
Project Name
89-3820-08
OVE-2231
LAW ENVIRONMENTAL NATIONAL LABORATORIES
TEST DATA REPORT
---Project Information ---
Cust. No. SHEPHERD PROPERTY
Manager: GLENN SOFGE
Station ID
Matrix
Type
Collector
Remarks
ww-8
w
GRAB
GS
---Sample Information ---
S811pled Date/Time
Received Date/Time
Received From/By
Chain of Custody
Number of Containers
---Test Data ---
06/28/89 13:55
06/30/89 10: 15
GS/CLM
6980
3
'arameter .••..........................• Method .... Units Det. Li■i t Results ... Test Date Analy t ORGANICS PREP RESULTS --voe SCREENING N/A 07/03/89 JAS I ORGANIC ANALYSIS RESULTS
• -omodichloromethane EPA 601 ug/1 1.0 ND 07/03/89 KO 3romofona EPA 601 ug/1 2.0 ND 07/03/89 KO lromomethane EPA 601 ug/1 12 ND 07/03/89 KO arbon tetrachloride EPA 601 ug/1 1.2 ND 07 /03/89 KO loroethane EPA 601 ug/1 5.2 ND 07/03/89 KO 2-Chloroethylvinyl ether EPA 601 ug/1 1.3 ND 07/03/89 KD lhloroform EPA 601 ug/1 0.5 ND 07/03/89 KO hloromethane EPA 601 ug/1 0.8 ND 07 /03/89 KD Dibromochloromethane EPA 601 ug/1 0.9 ND 07/03/89 KD ~,2-Dichlorobenzene EPA 601 ug/1 1.5 ND 07/03/89 KD ,3-Dichlorobenzene EPA 601 ug/1 3.2 ND 07 /03/89 KD ,4-Dichlorobenzene EPA 601 ug/1 2.4 ND 07/03/89 KO lichlorodifluoromethane EPA 601 ug/1 18 ND 07/03/89 KD ,1-Dichloroethane EPA 601 ug/1 0.7 ND 07/03/89 KD ,2 Dichloroethane EPA 601 ug/1 0.3 ND 07 /03/89 KD 1,1-Dichloroethene EPA 601 ug/1 1.3 ND 07/03/89 KD t,ans-1,2-Dichloroethene EPA 601 ug/1 1.0 ND 07/03/89 KD 2-Dichloropropane EPA 601 ug/1 0.4 ND 07/03/89 KD cis-1,3-Dichloropropene EPA 601 ug/1 3.4 ND 07/03/89 KD f.ans-1,3-Dichloropropene EPA 601 ug/1 3,4 ND 07/03/89 KD thylene Chloride EPA 601 ug/1 2.5 ND 07/03/89 KD ,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane EPA 601 ug/1 0.3 ND 07 /03/89 KD uetrachloroethene EPA 601 ug/1 0.3 ND 07/03/89 KD ,1,1-Trichloroethane EPA 601 ug/1 0.3 ND 07 /03/89 KD ',2-Trichloroethane EPA 601 ug/1 0.2 ND 07/03/89 KD
I ~-,d • Signed
89-3820-08
OVE-2231
LAW ENVIRONMENTAL NATIONAL LABORATORIES
TEST DATA REPORT
---Test Data ---
ta.meter ............................. .
--ORGANIC ANALYSIS RESULTS --
Method .... Units Det. Limit Results ...
echloroethene
hlorofluoromethane
1 Chloride
Benzene
lluorobenzene
11:,hylbenzene
Jluene
llenes
I
I
I
•
D
u
I
I
I
I
I
I
EPA 6o1
EPA 6o1
EPA 6o1
EPA 6o2
EPA 6o2
EPA 6o2
EPA 6o2
EPA 6o2
ug/1 1.2 ND
ug/1 3.2 ND
ug/1 1.8 ND
ug/1 1.0 ND
ug/1 1.0 ND
ug/1 1.0 ND
ug/1 1.0 ND
ug/1 2.0 ND
Signed
Test Date Analy
07 /03/89 KD
07/03/89 KD
07/03/89 KD
07/03/89 KD
07/03/89 KD
07/03/89 KD
07/03/89 KD
07/03/89 KD
'ate
Page
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
LAW ENVIRONMENTAL NATIONAL LABORATORIES
TEST DATA REPORT
07/20/89
1
Lab Number
Project No.
---Project Information
89-3820-13
OVE-2231 Cust. No. Project Name SHEPHERD PROPERTY
Manager: GLENN SOFGE
Station ID TRIP BLANK
Matrix W
Type GRAB
Collector GS
Remarks
---Sample Information ---
Sampled Date/Time
Received Date/Time
Received From/By
Chain of Custody
Number of Containers
---Test Data ---
I I
06/30/89 10: 15
GS/CLM
698o
3
Parameter ...........•....•............. Method .... Units Det. Limit Results ... Test Date Analy I; ORGANICS PREP RE.5ULTS --voe SCREENING N/A 07/03/89 JAS I :>RGANIC ANALYSIS RE.5ULTS
<>modichloromethane EPA 6ol ug/1 1.0 ND 07/03/89 KD ,moform EPA 6ol ug/1 2.0 ND 07/03/89 KD ··omomethane EPA 6ol ug/1 12 ND 07/03/89 KD ,rbon tetrachloride EPA 6ol ug/1 1.2 ND 07/03/89 KD '.1loroethane EPA 6ol ug/1 5.2 ND 07/03/89 KD 11:Chloroethylvinyl ether EPA 6ol ug/1 1.3 ND 07/03/89 KD loroform EPA 6ol ug/1 0.5 ND 07/03/89 KD loromethane EPA 6ol ug/1 0.8 ND 07/03/89 KD Dibromochloromethane EPA 6ol ug/1 0.9 ND 07/03/89 KD ·2-Dichlorobenzene EPA 6ol ug/1 1.5 ND 07/03/89 KD 3-Dichlorobenzene EPA 6ol ug/1 3.2 ND 07/03/89 KD 1.4-Dichlorobenzene EPA 6ol ug/1 2.4 ND 07/03/89 KD "chlorodifluoromethane EPA 6ol ug/1 18 ND 07/03/89 KD 1-Dichloroethane EPA 6ol ug/1 0.7 ND 07/03/89 KD .2 Dichloroethane EPA 6ol ug/1 0.3 1.9 07/03/89 KD 1.1-Dichloroethene EPA 6ol ug/1 1.3 ND 07/03/89 KD gans-1.2-Dichloroethene EPA 6o1 ug/1 1.0 ND 07/03/89 KD 2-Dichloropropane EPA 6ol ug/1 0.4 ND 07/03/89 KD cis-1.3-Dichloropropene EPA 6ol ug/1 3.4 ND 07/03/89 KD pans-1.3-Dichloropropene EPA 6ol ug/1 3.4 ND 07/03/89 KD thylene Chloride EPA 6ol ug/1 2.5 3.6 07/03/89 KD ,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane EPA 6ol ug/1 0.3 ND 07/03/89 KD ltrachloroethene EPA 6ol ug/1 0.3 ND 07/03/89 KD 1,1-Trichloroethane EPA 6ol ug/1 0.3 ND 07/03/89 KD ',2-Trichloroethane EPA 6ol ug/1 0.2 ND 07/03/89 KD
I ~-d I Signed ct?
late 07 /20/89
P!!,ge 2
I b Number
t.oject No.
I
89-3820-13
GVE-2231
LAW ENVIRONMENTAL NATIONAL LABORATORIES
TEST DATA REPORT
---Test Data ---
r::::~-~~~~~~-~~~~-~~········· Method .... Units Det. Limit Results ...
Trichloroethene
l ichlorofluoromethane
nyl Chloride
Benzene
robenzene
!benzene
ene llenes
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
a
It
I
I
I
EPA 601 ug/1 1.2 ND
EPA 601 ug/1 3.2 ND
EPA 601 ug/1 1.8 ND
EPA 602 ug/1 1.0 ND
EPA 602 ug/1 1.0 ND
EPA 602 ug/1 1.0 ND
EPA 602 ug/1 1.0 ND
EPA 602 ug/1 2.0 ND
Signed
Test Date Analy
07/03/89 KD
07/03/89 KD
07/03/89 KD
07/03/89 KD
07/03/89 KD
07/03/89 KD
07/03/89 KD
07/03/89 KD
late 07/20/89
Page 2
I ab Number
• roJect No.
I
89-3820-11
GVE-2231
LAW ENVIRONMENTAL NATIONAL LABORATORIES
TEST DATA RFPORT
---Test Data ---
1:r:::~-~~~~~-~~~-~~········· Method .... Units Det. Limit Results ...
Trichloroethene
lifrichlorofluoromethane
11l1ny1 Chloride
3enzene
l"hlorobenzene
·:hylbenzene
luene
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
u
fl
I
lenes
EPA 6ol
· EPA 6ol
EPA 6o1
EPA 6o2
EPA 6o2
EPA 6o2
EPA 6o2
EPA 6o2
ug/1 1.2 ND
ug/1 3,2 ND
ug/1 1.8 ND
ug/1 1.0 ND
ug/1 1.0 ND
ug/1 1.0 ND
ug/1 1.0 ND
ug/1 2.0 ND
Signed
Test Date Anal;·
07 /11/89 KD
07/11/89 KD
07/11/89 KD
07/11/89 KD
07/11/89 KD
07/11/89 KD
07/11/89 KD
07/11/89 KD
Page 1·
'I
I
I
I
I
1
07/20/89
1
LAW ENVIRONMENTAL NATIONAL LABORATORIES TEST DATA REPORT
Lab Number
Project No.
---Project Information
89-3820-11
GVE-2231 Cust. No. Project Name SHEPHERD PROPERTY
Manager: GLENN SOFGE
Station ID WW-11
Matrix W
Type GRAB
Collector GS
Remarks
---Sample Information ---
Sampled Date/Time
Received Date/Time
Received From/By
Chain of Custody
Number of Containers
---Test Data ---
06/28/89 16:10
06/30/89 10:15
OS/CLM
6980
3
'arameter .............................• Method .... Units Det. Limit Results ... Test Date Analy ·I• ORGANICS PREP RESULTS --. voe SCREENING
·II :GANIC ANALYSIS RESULTS
·-11,.odichloromethane
:romoform .
,,momethane · bon tetrachloride
oroethane
fthloroethylvinyl ether
'oroform
oromethane
ibromochloromethane q-Dichlorobenzene
-Dichlorobenzene
, -Dichlorobenzene
Jlorodifluoromethane
Dichloroethane
, Dichloroethane
.1-Dichloroethene t s-1,2-Dichloroethene
, Dichloropropane
ls-1,3-Dichloropropene
'
. s-1,3-Dichloropropene
ylene Chloride
, ,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
?rachloroethene
. 1-Trichloroethane
, ~-Trichloroethane
I
I
EPA 6o1
EPA 6ol
EPA 6ol
EPA 6ol
EPA 6ol
EPA 6ol
EPA 6ol
EPA 6ol
EPA 6ol
EPA 6o1
EPA 6ol
EPA 6ol
EPA 6ol
EPA 6ol
EPA 6ol
EPA 6ol
EPA 6o1
EPA 6ol
EPA 6ol
EPA 6ol
EPA 6ol
EPA 6ol
EPA 6o1
EPA 6ol
EPA 6ol
N/A 07/03/89 JAS
ug/1 1.0 ND 07/11/89 KD ug/1 2.0 ND 07/11/89 KD ug/1 12 ND 07/11/89 KD ug/1 1.2 ND 07 /11/89 KD ug/1 5.2 ND 07 /11/89 KD ug/1 1.3 ND 07 /11/89 KD ug/1 0.5 ND 07/11/89 KD ug/1 0.8 ND 07 /11/89 KD ug/1 0.9 ND 07/11/89 KD ug/1 1.5 ND 07 /11/89 KD ug/1 3.2 ND 07 /11/89 KD ug/1 2.4 ND 07 /11/89 KD ug/1 18 ND 07 /11/89 KD ug/1 0.7 ND 07 /11/89 KD ug/1 0.3 ND 07/11/89 KD ug/1 1.3 ND 07/11/89 KD ug/1 1.0 ND 07/11/89 KD ug/1 o.4 ND 07/11/89 KD ug/1 3.4 ND 07/11/89 KD ug/1 3.4 ND 07 /11/89 KD ug/1 2.5 ND 07/11/89 KD ug/1 0.3 ND 07/11/89 KD ug/1 0.3 ND~' 07/11/89 KD ug/1 0.3 ND 07/11/89 KD ug/1 0.2 ND 07/11/89 KD
Signed
late. 07/20/89
Page 2 I · ':> N1111ber
.• Jject No.
I
89-3820-12
GVE-2231
LAW ENVIRONMENTAL NATIONAL LABORATORIES
TEST DATA REPORT
---Test Data ---
Parameter ..•.•••...••.•..•.•.........•• Method .... Units Det. Limit Results ...
•-ORGANIC ANALYSIS RESULTS
Trichloroethene
richlorofluoromethane
nyl Chloride
nzene
I. ::1llorobenzene
,thylbenzene
c:>luene
.Xylenes
I
g
I
I
I
I
I
I
1·
I
EPA 6ol
EPA 601
EPA 6ol
EPA 6o2
EPA 6o2
EPA 6o2
EPA 602
EPA 6o2
ug/1 1.2 ND
ug/1 3.2 ND
ug/1 1.8 ND
ug/1 1.0 ND
ug/1 1.0 ND
ug/1 1.0 ND
ug/1 1.0 ND.
ug/1 2.0 ND
Signed
Test Date Analy
07/03/89 KD
07/03/89 KD
07/03/89 KD
07 /03/89 KD
07/03/89 KD
07/03/89 KD
07/03/89 KD
07/03/89 KD
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
D
ffl
•
I
I
I
I
July 28, 1989
LAW ENOINEEAINO
geotechnicaJ. environmental & construction materials consultants
1100 THOUSAND OAKS BLVD.
GOLDEN OAKS BUSINESS PARK
GREENVILLE, SOUTH CAROLINA 29607
[phone]
General Electric Light System
P.O. Box 2777
Hendersonville, North Carolina 28793
Attention:
Subject:
Gentlemen:
Mr. Mike Bush
Contamination Assessment Activities
General Electric
Hendersonville, North Carolina
Law Engineering Job Number GVE-1841E
Attached, please find our letter reviewing the preliminary
hydrogeological evaluation which was conducted at the GE facility
and the Shepherd property, East Flat Rock, North Carolina. If we
can be of further assistance please notify.
/ww
Very truly yours,
LAW ENGINEERING
/hi~G/J z ~1,~~.
Thomas L. Lammons
Environmental Services Manager
i/ . &-v, ~-{/ ~ -f--('
)tho;as H. Bo.¼J~rd, ✓.G.
Senior Hydrogeologist
/,)/;~~ t::,i¼~;. Campbell, P.G., P.H.
V Hydrogeological Consultant
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
D
D
m
D
m
E
I
I
I
I
I
1.0 INTRODUCTION
Law Engineering was retained by General Electric Corporation (GE) to
conduct an environmental assessment at the Lighting Systems Facility
in East Flat Rock, North Carolina. The assessment has progressed in
phases involving the installation of monitoring wells, bedrock
coring, aquifer tests and ground-water and soil_ sampling· for
chemical analysis. The presence of chlorinated halocarbon compounds
has been detected in the ground water from monitoring wells on site.
Concentrations of total volatile organic compounds (VOC) in ground
water range from 4014 parts per billion ( ppb) in MW-12A to non-
detected in well MW-21 at the western property boundary.
At GE's request, and under a separate Work Authorization, Law
Engineering conducted site ground-water sampling of twelve (12)
selected residential wells in the vicinity of E.B. Shepherd
property, Oak Grove Road, East Flat Rock, North Carolina. This task
was conducted to assess the potential for ground-water contamination
resulting from buried waste on the Shepherd property, The presence
of tetrachloroethane ( PCA) was detected in ground water in only
three of the wells sampled (WW-9, WW-10, and WW-12). Concentrations
of PCA in the three wells range from 155 ppb in WW-9 and 9 ppb in
WW-10 to 5 ppb in WW-12.
The distribution of contaminant leachate in ground water at these
two sites is largely controlled by the direction of ground water
flow, the configuration of the bedrock surface, and the severity and
orientation of bedrock fractures. As the leachate is carried from
the source in ground water it will become diluted due to a number of
phenomena including filtration, sorption, chemical processes,
microbial degradation, dispersion, time and distance of travel
(dilution).
A preliminary evaluation of the leachate movement and distribution
at these two sites is provided in this report. This evaluation is
based on the hydrogeological and analytical data currently
I
I
I
I
m
g
D
D
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
General Electric Light System
Law Engineering Job Number GVE-1841E
July 28, 1989
Page 2
available. It should be noted here that adequate data are
currently lacking for a complete hydrogeological evaluation,
therefore only estimates can be made at this time.
2.0 PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT OF SITE HYDROGEOLOGY AND
CONTAMINANT TRANSPORT
2.1 General Electric Facility
Subsurface geology at the site, as described in the Report of a
Phase IIA Contamination Assessment, Law Engineering, April 13, 1989,
generally consists of two primary units. The first unit consists of
unconsolidated and semi-consolidated materials (fill soils, alluvial
soils, residual soils and partially weathered rock). The second
unit generally consists of a fractured crystalline bedrock (biotite
gneiss with quartz pegmatite intrusions). Observations made during
rock coring indicated that a number of fractures are present
throughout the bedrock regime at the site.
Hydraulically, the upper soil unit and the lower fractured bedrock
unit appear to be interconnected and function as a single aquifer.
Ground-water (and contaminant leachate) movement in the upper unit
is limited by the permeability (hydraulic conductivity) of the silty
soils. Slug tests indicate a hydraulic conductivity range of 1 x
10-3 to 1 x 10-4 cm/sec in the upper soil zone. The computed
hydraulic gradient at the site ranges from 0.0125 to 0.04 feet/feet
and the effective porosity 0.18 to 0.21. The velocity of ground
water flow is expected to be in the range of 50 to 150 feet per
year in the upper soil aquifer. The coefficients of hydraulic
conductivity have not been determined in the bedrock regime. These
data will be collected from aquifer tests scheduled for the next
phase of work (Phase IIIA).
I
I
I
I
m
9
m
I
•
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
General Electric Light System
Law Engineering Job Nwnber GVE-1841E
July 28, 1989
Page 3
The GE plant grounds have
soil and more widespread
water. The contaminants
significant local contamination in the
dissolved contamination in the ground
involved are the typical chlorinated
solvents, e.g. PCE, TCE, and other degraded byproducts.
Most of the contaminants are known as dense non-aqueous phase liquid
(DNAPL) chemicals, which indicate that:
1. the contaminants have a density greater than water,
2. the contaminants are immiscible in water, and
3. the contaminants have low but significant solubilities.
Of special interest is that the densities of the DNAPL vapors are
also greater than air. These properties allow the contaminant to be
absorbed by the clays of the soil and to travel in the underlying
intervals above the water table. With each recharge event (either
precipitation or intentional flooding or sprinkling), following each
spill or release over the years, the contaminant moves by gravity
downward into the soil.
If the volume is sufficient, the ONAPL will reach the water table
and continue to migrate downward via the available pore space in the
subsurface soils, and eventually to the fractures in the bedrock
below. Once the primary DNAPL chemicals reach the water table, some
of the material will dissolve and then migrate along with the flow
of the ground water. The vapor generated from the contaminants
present, being heavier than air, will migrate downward through the
unsaturated zone to the water table. Figure 1 illustrates the
distribution of contamination with respect to the bedrock surface.
Based on the data available, preliminary evaluations of the ground-
water flow regime have been made. Figures 2 and 3 are
hydrogeological cross sections across the GE facility grounds.
I
I
I
I
m
m
D
I
D
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
General Electric Light System
Law Engineering Job Number GVE-1841E
July 28, 1989
Page 4
These preliminary sections clearly indicate that the main
contaminated site (MW-12A) is located in a recharge zone (where the
ground-water flow vector is down relative to a horizontal plane) and
the area along the creek is a ground-water discharge zone, up as far
as MW-14 (where the principal flow vector is up relative to the
horizontal). Figure 4 is a water-table map which illustrates the
) ground-water flow direction in the planner view. Figure 5 is a site
plan of the G.E. property with locations of plant facilities and
monitoring wells.
Trace values of VOC's, including DNAPL chemicals, have been detected
in several residential wells along Oak Grove Road, northeast of the
G. E. property ( G. Holbert, E. Goodman, and L. Cannon) . G. E. has
expressed a concern as to the source of this contamination. A
strong case could be made on basic hydrogeological grounds that this
contamination originates along Oak Grove Road and is not related to
G. E. 's on-sight activities. From USGS topographic data, the Oak
Grove Road area in question appears to be located in a recharge area
hydraulically upgradient from the Bat Fork Creek discharge area. It
is unlikely that ground water flow would travel hydraulically
upgradient from the G. E. property to the northeast as far as Oak
Grove Road, unless a deeper flow regime exists in bedrock fractures.
The distribution of contamination at the facility is illustrated in
Figures 6 and 7. Figure 6 is an isopleth map of total volatile
halocarbons at the site. Figure 7 is an illustration of the
distribution of contamination .on and off site. Arrows indicate the
direction of ground-water movement across the site, and the probable
direction of ground-water movement from a potential off-site source
northeast of GE property along Oak Grove Road.
The distribution of organic compounds in ground water also suggests
that contamination of the water wells along Oak Grove Road does not
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
m
g
D
D
0
I
I
D
I
General Electric Light System
Law Engineering Job Number GVE-1841E
July 28, 1989
Page 5
originate from a source on GE property. Dispersion of a leachate in
an aquifer causes the concentration of the contaminants to decrease
with increasing length of flow. Concentrations of volatile
contaminants are greater in the off-site wells along Oak Grove Road
than in the down-gradient residential area labeled "RA" on Figure 5.
In addition a zone of uncontaminated wells is located between these
two areas. Again, this would indicate an off-site source for the
contamination northeast of the G.E. property.
Shepherd Property
On June 28, 1989 Law Engineering conducted a ground-water sampling
reconnaissance of residential water supply wells in the vicinity of
the Shepherd property. Analytical results of the twelve (12) wells
sampled, revealed contamination by PCA in three wells. These three
wells are located on the adjacent "Hill" property to the west. All
analytical results are attached. Figure 8 identifies the Shepherd
property, and the location of water supply wells where contamination
by PCA was identified. The other water supply wells included in the
sampling effort are generally located to the east of the shaded area
in Figure 8. Table 1 identifies each property owner involved and
the respective sample station.
The occurrence and movement of ground water at this site is by
analogy assumed to be similar to that of the GE facility, although
no monitoring wells or soil test borings have been installed to
date. A preliminary evaluation of the surface topography and
drainage has been conducted. Also a preliminary fracture trace
analysis of this area has been conducted to identify possible joint
systems in the bedrock where preferred subsurface flow of ground
water and contamination might occur. Figure 9 is a USGS topographic
quadrangle map showing selected fracture traces.
I
I
I
I
I
n
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
General Electric Light System Law Engineering Job Nwnber GVE-1841E
July 28, 1989
Page 6
Based on the limited data available, the following opinions are
presented at this time:
The Shepherd property source of contamination could be
located on a water-table divide. If this is the case, flow
could occur in any direction from the south.
The potential for bedrock fractures in this area exists. If
significant fractures exist in the bedrock beneath this
site, ground water and contamination could flow to the east
causing contamination of these residential water supplies.
Any other statements concerning dispersion or dilution away
from this source would be speculative at this time.
SUMMARY
A preliminary evaluation of the hydrogeology and contamination
dispersion was conducted for two areas of interest. These areas
are:
1. General Electric facility site, East Flat Rock, North
Carolina.
2. Shepherd property vicinity, East Flat Rock, North Carolina.
The opinions stated in this report are based on a limited data
base.
I
I
I
u
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
General Electric Light System Law Engineering Job Number GVE-1841E
July 28, 1989
Page 7
The following opinions are postulated:
GE Plant Site
Residential wells along Oak Grove Road, northeast of the GE
facility (e.g. L. Cannon, G. Holbert, E. Goodman) appear to
be hydraulically upgradient of the primary ground-water
discharge area for the GE facility.
It is unlikely that contamination of the ground water in
these residential wells could originate from the plant
property, unless contaminant dispersion is affected by a
deeper flow occurring in bedrock fractures. This condition
could be better evaluated after an aquifer pumping test is
performed.
The distribution of voe contamination in the residential
water supply wells northeast of the GE property suggests
that an off-site source is involved (e.g. buried drums,
dumping sites, etc.).
Shepherd Property
Based on analytical data and in inferences obtained from
USGS topographic maps it appears that potentially
contaminated ground water from the Shepherd property could
flow in any direction from the south.
The potential for bedrock joint systems could allow for
preferred deep bedrock flow, and contaminant transport, to
the east Shepherd property.
I
I
I Station
m
WW-1
WW-2
WW-3
WW-4 g WW-5
WW-6
WW-7
D WW-8
WW-9
WW-10
m
WW-11
WW-12
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I.D.
RESIDENTIAL GROUND-WATER SAMPLING
EAST FLAT ROCK, NORTH CAROLINA
June 28, 1989
Property Owner
Jess R. Harris.
John N. Camp.
Roy H. Melton.
Odell Edney
Otto C. Banks
Thomas A. Dupont
N/A
Ernest H. Russell
Hill residence
Hill slaughter house
Hill Property (Raglin
renter)
Maybin Hill
VOLATILE HALOCARBON AND TOP OF ROCK CONTOUR MAP
SCALE 1 :400
THf .. INT MACHINE,INC. N9U00
□ GR£AT£K rµAA.J 50 .uc.; L.
@Ml GRE.ATE.fi' "TlfAAI zoo UG/ L
IJ/JTI!:: CIJAJTOLA"t E.Ll!:VATIO.V £QUIIL3
£L~VAT/OAJ .5HOWAJ {Fl!:£T1 M$L)
PLU.S ZODO FT.
VIJLA TIL £.. HALOCARl!LJAJ
/.SOPLETµ
JOB NO.
LAW ENGINEERING
GREENVILLE, SOUTH CAROLINA
GRDUAIDWATE.R CLJNTAMIAIATIOAJ
AAJD B£DROCIC .SV/fFAC£
G £. PLAAJT
£AST FLAT RDl'.K NIJll'TN CARIJLINA
FIGURE f
l
[ '
r •
' l.
EUYATIO.
(FUT, 1151.)
2180.00
2160.00
2140.00
2120.00
2100.00
2080.00
□ ·I
El
~
II
. I
§
AR
BT
MW-8
I
-!'ILL
-ALLUVIUM
-SILT WITS VAR,,
-SAND WITS VARU
!'ART IALL Y WEAll!i
-ROC!t
-SCREEJIED INTERV;
GROOHD-WATEll II-
-POWER AOGER REFI
-BORING TERMIJI
*NOTE: Mll-8
' -J
J
I
_J
-1 ....
l I
r ,,
I
I
I
1
I
J
[
1--~[l[~Y~A~Tl:-::CJI:------------------------------.
(FUT• . 2200.00
2180.00
2160.00
2140.00
2120.00
2100.00
2080.00
2060.00
NW-11 I
Nll-19
·--~Nll~-;26:.,_ __ ....:s~·u~RF~A~C;E~T~Ul'!UG~RAP~H~Y~L...-tJ---•cr--.
9
□ ■ El
~
■
■ §
AR
BT
~~
-FILL
-ALLUVIUM
SILT WIJI
-SAND WIJ
PARTIALL .
-ROCJt 0
-SCREEllED I.
GR()(JJII; Jl
-POWER Al
BORING
I
I
I
GROUND-WATER CONTOUR MAP
24
THI f"l .. t MACHINl!,INC. N9'24Cl0
"' 0
-26 e
MW-2 e
MW-2 e
SCALE 1 :400
M
MW-27 e
23
IIJOTY::: GR'OOIJD -MITER' COA/TOVK
£LEVATION E:t:/UALS. ELEVATIDAJ
.:SHOWA/ (FEET1 MSL) PLUS 2/00.
JOB NO.
LAW ENGINEERING
GREENVILLE,SOUTH CAROLINA
t.. E. PLAI\JT
£AST FLAT ROCK, IUORTH CA/it:JLIAJA
FIGURE 4
n
...
Ml■ P'I.MT
A
" • " ~
i k: I
Ii ~
i
I
-• -·
I
I
m
d
V.t.11'AIIUK Ill
0 ...
I
I
1-----------------,
I
I
I
I
I
m
D
m
ffl
I
D
I
I
I
•
I
I
VOLATILE HALOCARBON ISOPLETH MAP
NOTES:
l. COIITOUR I IITERV Al IN Ml 6ROG1W1S PER LITER
BASED OIi TOTAL VOI.ATJU HALOCARBOIIS FRIii
EPA IETIIOOS 80 JO OR 60 l.
2. MAP BASED OIi AIIAI.YSIS Of SAMPLES OBTAINED
FROI IIARCH 1988 THROUGH IWICH 1989.
3. COIITOURS C!N'ITTIR GENERATED US1116 'SURFER".
0 -0 -3
W-2 EB
~ -4
SCALE 1 :400
5
~ LAW ENGINEERING
~ GREENVILLE,SOUTH CAROLINA
G. ~. PLAAJT
LJJT Tl.AT lrOCK, AJIJRTH CA1rliLIAJA
JOB NO. FIGURE'
VULATILE HALUCARBUN
ISOPLETH
CUNTAMINATIUN
NUT DETECTED
I
I
I
I
I
I
m
g
D
D
I
m
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
YEAR
1 9:i 6
TO
1962
1%~
TO
1965
196S
THRU
1967
1968
THRU
197 0
1955 -1970 DISPOSAL HISTORY
TRANSPORTER DISPOSAL LOCATION, ETC.
SHEPHERD HENDERSON COUNTY LANDFILL, WHICH AT THIS TIME WAS
IN THE AREA OF THE CITY PARK.
SHEPHERD SHEPHERD PROPERTY ON ROPER ROAD.
STERNBURG DISPOSAL LOCATION IS UNKNOWN, STERNBURG WAS FROM
ASHEVILLE.
SHEPHERD SHEPHERD PROPERTY ON ROPER ROAD.
SHEPHERD FAINS DUMP, A LOT THAT MR. SHEPHERD LEASED NORTH
OF HEtJDERSONVILLE OFF HIGHWAY 25.
PER t1P.. SHEPHERD, OCTOBER, 197 0 WAS THE LAST DATE OF BUSltlESS WITH GE.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
g
M
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
BAT FORK CREEK
GE PROPERTY
f'.AP LEGEND
SCALE 3/4" = 1000'
STREAM DISCHARGE TO BAT FORK CREEK FROM GE
l) SHEPHERD PRCPERTY/RESIDEHCE
-TARGET OF STATE SUPERFUND INYESTIGATIOII
-LOC.ATIOIJ OF r.EPO,-TED DISPOSAL AREA
2) HILL RESIDENCE, DUG WELL, PCE = 193ppb, TRICHLORO = trace
3) RAGLAND RESIDEIJCE, DUG HELL, PCE = 237pph
-REQUESTED THAT GE MOYE HEP. AND HER FAMILY.
4) llAYBIN RESIDENCE, DEEP HELL, PCE = 5 ppb
----------CREEK SEDIMENT----------
S) UPSTREA~: SAl!PLE LOCATIOI,, PCB(l2::i4) = COCppb
-SMALL STREAM EIJTERS BAT FORK CREEK FROl1 GE YACAIJT LOT
6) NPDES DISCHARGE
7) DISCHARGE SAl1PLE LOCATJOIJ, PCB(lZ48) = l40ppb
-TH IS WAS THE SAi IPLE lvE SPLIT AIID AIJAL YZED, OUR RESULT I/AS t!Ot! DETECTED
OUR DETECT IOIJ LIMIT WAS l OOppb.
8) DOWIJSTREA11 SAIIPLE LOCATJOIJ, PCB ( 12~) = :;; OOppb, PCB ( l Z60) = :i 90ppb,
PCB(TOTAL) = d09Cppb
-DUKE PCWER SUBSTATIOIJ AND OUR DErlOLITION LAIIDFILL DRAIN ItJTO THIS AREA.
9) DEl10LITION LAIIDFILL
I
I
I
g
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1 I e
,ol
----:;/,
/ , -·-~/ // ,-_,
f. -.
THf: l'IINT M.ACHINf,lp,,f(,
I • I I I
• • •
• ' • • 8 I •
•
I-I/LL PINJP£RTY
lJ'lr/JUA/0 KJAT£Jl Ct»JTAMIAIATIIJAJ
PQT£UTIAL FLOW Ir/JUTE FDR
GR'fJLJAJt:I WAT£Jl Ct»JTAMIAIAT/IJAI
...,..,
JOB NO,
•
•
)
11 ,
'II'
, I\
Tl
-I I
'
LAW ENGINEERING
GREENVILLE,SOUTH CAROLINA
.SH£PHEflrD -PRDP£1i'TY SIT£
EAST FLAT Ht>C,K1 AJLJKTN CAlrllLIAIA
FIGURE 8
I
I
I
I
0
m
m
I
I
I
I
I
I
,, ,, ,, ,,
" .
"t~,/~-\ ·.)
-)(
/
:;, .
-
11 n
---;=..!
-.:. ;Ser=, -~, ~ '~:;-:.:,:;~~~1v.:2~ -.. .;e"c::::. ~-"
TRACE. LIAJE.AME.A.JTJ
Sl'.AL~ 24000'
THE l'l:INT MACHIN!,INC.
\
\v.:o,,.,,.,,,,,;, .-:-, ----1 ,
, .. \_:_, ~
'·,\ ----~ I«: ' , /
\. ~\~~~( \ ~ .....__, /,...:.::, ....... ' ~0(
-~ .... ·, -.. ·, ..
I
~-
~: -~
~{
..d; _,
-~
.,,,,.
.I " I .. ,
-~
~ LAW ENGINEERING ,ail GREENVILLE,SOUTH CAROLINA
SELECTED FRACTVli'E. TRACE. L/1.JE:AME.A.JT.S
£.AST F£A T ROCK', A/OR TJ/ CAROL/,1/A
JOB NO, FIGURE q
Page
I
I
D
m
07/20/89
1
Lab Number
Project No.
Project Na.me
LAW ENVIRONMENTAL NATIONAL LABORATORIES
TEST DATA REPORT
---Project Information
89-3820-12
OVE-2231
SHEPHERD PROPERTY
Cust. No.
Manager: GLENN SOFGE
Station ID
Matrix
Type
Collector
Remarks
WW-12
w
GRAB
GS
---Sample Information
Sampled Date/Tise
Received Date/Time
Received From/By
Chain or Custody
Number of Containers
---Test Data ---
06/28/89 16:50
06/30/89 10: 15
GS/CLM
6980
3
Ira.meter ............................. . Method .... Units Det. Lia.it Results ... Test Date Analy I ORGANICS PRF.P RESULTS --voe SCREENING N/A 07/03/89 JAS I RGANIC ANALYSIS RESULTS
omodichloromethane EPA 601 ug/1 1.0 ND 07/03/89 KD ·omoform EPA 6o1 ug/1 2.0 ND 07/03/89 KD
Eomethane EPA 6o1 ug/1 12 ND 07/03/89 KD bon tetrachloride EPA 6o1 ug/1 1.2 ND 07/03/89 KD roethane . EPA 6o1 ug/1 5.2 ND 07/03/89 KD 2-Chloroethylvinyl ether EPA 6o1 ug/1 1.3 ND 07/03/89 KD
lloroform EPA 6o1 ug/1 0.5 ND 07/03/89 KD loromethane EPA 6ol ug/1 0.8 ND 07/03/89 KD Dibromochloromethane EPA 6o1 ug/1 0.9 ND 07/03/89 KD
,2-Dichlorobenzene EPA 6o1 ug/1 1.5 ND 07/03/89 KD 3-Dichlorobenzene EPA 6o1 ug/1 3,2 ND 07/03/89 KD ,4-Dichlorobenzene EPA 6o1 ug/1 2.4 ND 07/03/89 KD
lchlorodifluoromethane EPA 6o1 ug/1 18 ND 07/03/89 KD 1-Dichloroethane EPA 6ol ug/1 0.7 ND 07/03/89 KD ,2 Dichloroethane EPA 6o1 ug/1 0.3 ND 07/03/89 KD 1,1-Dichloroethene EPA 6ol ug/1 1.3 ND 07/03/89 KD
,ans-1,2-Dichloroethene EPA 6o1 ug/1 1.0 ND 07/03/89 KD 2-Dichloropropane EPA 6o1 ug/1 o.4 ND 07/03/89 KD
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene EPA 6ol ug/1 3,4 ND 07/03/89 KD ,ans-1,3-Dichloropropene EPA 6ol ug/1 3,4 ND 07/03/89 KD thylene Chloride EPA 6ol ug/1 2.5 ND 07/03/89 KD
,l,2,2-Tetrachloroethane EPA 6o1 ug/1 0.3 ND 07/03/89 KD
ltrachloroethene EPA 6o1 ug/1 0.3 5.3 07/03/89 KD 1,1-Trichloroethane EPA 6o1 ug/1 0.3 ND 07/03/89 KD · '.2-Trichloroethane EPA 6o1 ug/1 0.2 ND 07/03/89 KD
I ~~.,J I Signed
Page
07/20/89
1
LAW ENVIRONMENTAL NATIONAL LABORATORIES
TEST DATA REPORT
I
Lab Number
Project No.
---Project Information
89-3820-10
I Project Na.me
GVE-2231
SHEPHERD PROPERTY
Cust, No.
Manager: GLENN SOFGE
---Sample Information ---
I
m
I
Station ID
Matrix
Type
Collector
Remarks
WW-10
w
GRAB
GS
Parameter ............... , ............. .
I ORGANICS PREP RESULTS --
VOC SCREENING
·■ )RGANIC ANALYSIS RESULTS
9omodichloromethane
:-oaoform
101110methane
~bon tetrachloride
~oroethane
. -Chloroethylvinyl ether l loroform
loromethane
Dibromochloromethane
9<!-Dichlorobenzene
•3-Dichlorobenzene
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
l hlorodifluoromethane
-Dichloroethane
,2 Dichloroethane
1,1-Dichloroethene
iaans-1,2-Dichloroethene
1112-Dichloropropane
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
s-1,3-Dichloropropene
thylene Chloride
, ,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
l trachloroethene
1,1-Trichloroethane
. '.2-Trichloroethane
I
I
Sampled Date/Time
Received Date/Time
Received Froa/By
Chain of Custody
Number of Containers
06/28/89 16:00
06/30/89 10: 15
GS/CLM
6980
3
---Test Data ---
Method .... Units Det. Limit Results ... Test Date Analy
EPA 6ol
.EPA 601
EPA 601
EPA 6ol
EPA 6ol
EPA 6ol
EPA 6ol
EPA 6ol
rl'A 6ol
EPA 6ol
EPA 6ol
EPA 6ol
EPA 6ol
EPA 6ol
EPA 6ol
EPA 6ol
EPA 6ol
EPA 6ol
EPA 6ol
EPA 6ol
EPA 6ol
EPA 6ol
EPA 6ol
EPA 6ol
EPA 6ol
ug/1 1.0
ug/1 2.0
ug/1 12
ug/1 1.2
ug/1 5.2
ug/1 1.3
ug/1 0.5
ug/1 0.8
ug/1 0.9
ug/1 1.5
ug/1 3,2
ug/1 2.4
ug/1 18
ug/1 0. 7
ug/1 0,3
ug/1 1.3
ug/1 1.0
ug/1 0.4
ug/1 3.4
ug/1 3.4
ug/1 2,5
ug/1 0.3
ug/1 0.3
ug/1 0,3
ug/1 0.2
Signed
N/A 07 /03/89 JAS
ND 07 /03/89 KD
ND 07 /03/89 KD
ND 07 /03/89 KD
ND 07 /03/89 KD
ND 07 /03/89 KD
ND 07 /03/89 KD
ND 07 /03/89 KD
ND 07 /03/89 KD
ND 07 /03/89 KD
ND 07 /03/89 KD
ND 07 /03/89 KD
ND 07 /03/89 KD
ND 07 /03/89 KD
ND 07 /03/89 KD
ND 07 /03/89 KD
ND 07 /03/89 KD
ND 07 /03/89 KD
ND 07 /03/89 KD
ND 07 /03/89 KD
ND 07 /03/89 KD
ND 07 /03/89 KD
ND 07 /03/89 KD
8. 7 07 /03/89 KD
ND 07 /03/89 · KD
ND 07 /03/89 KD
,1!,,,.,,;(f'J
I Date
I
B
I
I
07/20/89
1
Lab Number
Project No.
Project Name
89-3820-09
GVE-2231
LAW ENVIRONXENTAL NATIONAL LABORATORIES TEST DATA REPORT
---Project Information
Cust. No. SHEPHERD PROPERTY
Manager: GLENN SOFOE
Station ID WW-9
Matrix W
Type GRAB
Collector OS
Remarks •
---Sample Information ---
Sampled Date/Time
Received Date/Time
Received From/By
Chain of Custody
Number of Containers
---Test Data ---
06/28/89 15:50
06/30/89 10: 15
OS/CLM
6980
3
Parameter .............................. Method .... Units Det. Lilli t Results ... Test Date Analy ll ORGANICS PREP RESULTS --'l'f voe SCREENING
II JRGANIC ANALYSIS RESULTS --~chloromethane
Bromoform
ltomomethane
9'rbon tetrachloride
Chloroethane
IChloroethylvinyl ether loroform 1 ,loromethane · ibromochloromethane 12-Dichlorobenzene
3-Dichlorobenzene
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
l chlorodifluoromethane
1-Dichloroethane
1,2 Dichloroethane
Dichloroethene
-1,2-Dichloroethene
1, Dichloropropane
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
19ms-1,3-Dichloropropene
!41:hylene Chloride
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
~,rachloroethene
1 ,1-Trichloroethane
l 2-Trichloroethane
I
I
EPA 601
EPA 601
EPA 601
EPA 601
EPA 601
EPA 601
EPA 601
EPA 601
EPA 601
EPA 601
EPA 601
EPA 601
EPA 601
EPA 601
EPA 601
EPA 601
EPA 601
EPA 601
EPA 601
EPA 601
EPA 601
EPA 601
EPA 601
EPA 601
EPA 601
ug/1 1.0
ug/1 2.0
ug/1 12
ug/1 1.2
ug/1 5.2
ug/1 1.3
ug/1 0.5
ug/1 0.8
ug/1 0.9
ug/1 1.5
ug/1 3,2
ug/1 2.4
ug/1 18
ug/1 0.7
ug/1 0,3
ug/1 1.3
ug/1 1.0
ug/1 o.4
ug/1 3.4
ug/1 3,4
ug/1 2.5
ug/1 0.3
ug/1 0.3
ug/1 0.3
ug/1 0.2
Signed
N/A 07/03/89 JAS
ND 07/11/89 KD ND 07 /11/89 KD ND 07/11/89 KD ND 07/11/89 KD ND 07/11/89 KD ND 07/11/89 KD ND 07/11/89 KD ND 07/11/89 KD ND 07/11/89 KD ND 07/11/89 KD ND 07/11/89 KD
ND 07/11/89 KD ND 07/11/89 KD
ND 07/11/89 KD ND 07/11/89 KD ND 07/11/89 KD
ND 07/11/89 KD
ND 07/11/89 KD
ND 07/11/89 KD
ND 07/11/89 KD ND 07/11/89 KD ND 07/11/89 KD
155 07/11/89 KD
ND 07/11/89 KD ND 07/11/89 KD
late 07 /20/89
Page 2 I ,ab NUlllber 89-3820-09
rroject No. OVE-2231
LAW ENVIRONMENTAL NATIONAL LABORATORIES
T&ST DATA REPORT
---Test Data ---
Parameter ............................. . Method, .•. Units Det. Limit Results ...
,_ ORGANIC ANALYSIS RESULTS --
Trichloroethene
ichlorofluoromethane
inyl Chloride
nzene
lorobenzene
thylbenzene
oluene
Xylenes
D
I
I -
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
F.PA 601 ug/1 1.2 ND
F.PA 601 ug/1 3.2 ND
F.PA 601 ug/1 1.8 ND
F.PA 602 ug/1 1.0 ND
EPA 602 ug/1 1.0 ND
EPA 602 ug/1 1.0 ND
EPA 602 ug/1 1.0 ND
EPA 602 ug/1 2.0 ND
Signed
Test Date Analy
07/11/89 KD
07/11/89 KD
07/11/89 KD
07 /11/89 KD
07/11/89 KD
07/11/89 KD
07/11/89 KD
07/11/89 KD