NCD024766719_20011213_Wright Chemical Corporation_FRBCERCLA C_IHSP Correspondence 1975 - 2011-OCR

6A
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Beverly Eaves Perdue
Governor
December 13, 20 I I
Hexion Specialty Chemicals
Attn: President
I 30 E. Broad Street
Columbus, OH 43215
Division of Waste Management
Dexter R. Matthews
Director
Re: Inactive Hazardous Waste Sites Priority List
Wright Chemical Corp.
Riegelwood, Columbus County
Dear Sir or Madam:
l"""'.s=-=c"""'A:-:N~N=E=""'Freeman
Secretary
I FFB 2 5 2013
N.C. Superfund Section
The site listed above has been included on the October 2011 Inactive Hazardous Waste Sites Priority List
(Priority List) in accordance with North Carolina General Statutes Section 130A-3 I0.2. The Priority List
is a list of sites where uncontrolled disposal, spills, or releases of hazardous substances have been
identified. A special priority system (North Carolina Administrative Code Title 15A Subchapter I 3C
Section 0.200) is used to rank the sites in decreasing order of danger to public health and the environment.
This letter is being sent to you to fulfill our statutory duty to notify those who own and those who at
present are known to be responsible for each site on the Priority List. A copy of the Priority List with
each site's rank appearing in the right-hand column is available at
http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/wm/sf1sfavailabledocs under the Site Inventory heading. This list is in
alphabetical order by site name to make it easier for you to locate your score.
Any responsible party that has not already done so, must take the initial abatement actions required under
North Carolina groundwater quality regulations (15A NCAC 2L). Pursuant to 15A NCAC 2L .0106(b),
any person conducting or controlling an activity which results in the discharge of a waste or hazardous
substance to the groundwater of the State, or in proximity thereto, shall take immediate action to
terminate and control the discharge, and mitigate any ha,.ards resulting from exposure to the pollutants.
Pursuant to 15A NCAC 2L .0106(c), if groundwater standards have been exceeded, a responsible party
must take immediate action to eliminate the source or sources of contamination. Beyond initial abatement
actions, all assessment and cleanup will be done through the Inactive Hazardous Sites Response Act
(N.C.G.S. I 30A-3 I 0) authority.
Under the Inactive Hazardous Sites Response Act, persons who move forward to assess and clean up
contamination, without being compelled to do so through formal legal action filed against them, are called
"volunteers." To participate in the Inactive Hazardous Sites Branch's voluntary cleanup program, you will
be required to enter into an administrative agreement with the Branch. If a responsible party or owner
wishes to voluntarily perform a site cleanup, they should first complete a Site Cleanup Questionnaire
available at http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/wm/sf/sfavailabledocs under the Forms heading. The voluntary
cleanup will proceed through the Registered Environmental Consultant Program or under direct oversight
by the Branch Staff, as discussed below.
1646 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1646
Phone/FAX: [phone] \ Internet: http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/wm
An Equal Opportunity I Affirmative Acton Em~oyer
OnehC . Nort arohna /Va turn fly
Wright Chemical Corp.
Page 2
The Branch has a privatized oversight arm of the voluntary cleanup program known as the Registered
Environmental Consultant ("REC") program. Based on the responses provided on the questionnaire
(degree of hazard and public interest in the site), the Branch will determine whether a staff person or an
REG-will-perfonn-the-oversight and approval of your assessment and cleanup action. Please note that
hdvi~gj~j :9f%cf(~!6f~rgin~itions identified on the questionnaire does not necessarily preclude the site
for qualifying;-fcir-an·•REC'ciirected cleanup action.
I I I I
UhdJ the REC program, tJe vbiunteer hires an environmental consulting finn, which the State has
ap1prc/ved·as· having·met certain qualifications, to implement a cleanup and certify that the work is being
pCfro#n•ccf?iAicoffi·p1ian6e.~itA ~egulations. In other words, the REC)s certifications of compliance are in
pl~ceofdireci ·oversiglitliy'th~ Branch. Details of the REC program can be found at
http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/wm/sf/ihs/recprogram. If you have any questions specific to the REC
Program, including how to participate, please contact the REC Program Manager, Kim Caulk, at (9 I 9)
707-8350.
If the Branch determines that the site should be assessed and cleaned up with direct State oversight, it will
not be eligible for a REC-directed cleanup. Rather, the cleanup action will receive direct oversight by
Branch staff.
Failure of a responsible party to take the initial abatement steps required in I SA NCAC 2L may result in
the assessment ofa civil penalty against that responsible party. In addition, the Branch may seek an
injunction compelling compliance with the initial abatement steps required in 15A NCAC 2L. For future
work beyond the initial abatement steps required pursuant to I SA NCAC 2L, a unilateral Order may be
issued pursuant to N.C.G.S. 130A-3 I0.3 to compel assessment and cleanup.
If you have any questions, you may contact Bruce Parris, Western Regional Supervisor at (704) 235-
2185, John Walch, Eastern Regional Supervisor at (9 I 9) 707-8356 or me at [phone]. You can
view a Branch regional map at http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/wm/sf/ihs/ihsregmap to determine if your site
lies in the western or eastern region. Those who arc interested in reviewing the Superfund Section's files
on any of these sites may contact Scott Ross at [phone], to schedule an appointment. You may
also contact Mr. Ross if you do not have access to the internet and would like to request a copy of the
Priority List be mailed to you.
Sincerely,
C~n~
Inactive Hazardous Site Branch
Superfund Section
CVJ/slbb(SPLMERGELTR 2011.DOCX)
RA
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Waste Management
Beverly Eaves Perdue
Governor
December 13, 2011
Mr. W. E. Lewis, General Manager
Oak-Bark Corporation
333 Neils Eddy Road
Riegelwood, NC 28456
Dexter R. Matthews
Director
Re: Inactive Hazardous Waste Sites Priority List
Wright Chemical Corp.
Riegelwood, Columbus County
Dear Mr. Lewis:
Dee Freeman
Secretary
SCANNED L~~, '"" I
N.C. Supertund Section
The site listed above has been included on the October 2011 Inactive Hazardous Waste Sites Priority List
(Priority List) in accordance with North Carolina General Statutes Section 130A-310.2. The Priority List
is a list of sites where uncontrolled disposal, spills, or releases of hazardous substances have been
identified. A special priority system (North Carolina Administrative Code Title 15A Subchapter 13C
Section 0.200) is used to rank the sites in decreasing order of danger to public health and the environment.
This letter is being sent to you to fulfill our statutory duty to notify those who own and those who at
present are known to be responsible for each site on the Priority List. A copy of the Priority List with
each site's rank appearing in the right-hand column is available at
http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/wm/sf/sfavailabledocs under the Site Inventory heading. This list is in
alphabetical order by site name to make it easier for you to locate your score.
Any responsible party that has not already done so, must take the initial abatement actions required under
North Carolina groundwater quality regulations (1 SA NCAC 2L). Pursuant to 1 SA NCAC 2L .0 I 06(b),
any person conducting or controlling an activity which results in the discharge of a waste or hazardous
substance to the groundwater of the State, or in proximity thereto, shall take immediate action to
terminate and control the discharge, and mitigate any hazards resulting from exposure to the pollutants.
Pursuant to I SA NCAC 2L .0 I 06(c), if groundwater standards have been exceeded, a responsible party
must take immediate action to eliminate the source or sources of contamination. Beyond initial abatement
actions, all assessment and cleanup will be done through the Inactive Hazardous Sites Response Act
(N.C.G.S. 130A-310) authority.
Under the Inactive Hazardous Sites Response Act, persons who move forward to assess and clean up
contamination, without being compelled to do so through formal legal action filed against them, are called
"volunteers." To participate in the Inactive Hazardous Sites Branch's voluntary cleanup program, you will
be required to enter into an administrative agreement with the Branch. If a responsible party or owner
wishes to voluntarily perform a site cleanup, they should first complete a Site Cleanup Questionnaire
available at http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/wm/sf/sfavailabledocs under the Forms heading. The voluntary
cleanup will proceed through the Registered Environmental Consultant Program or under direct oversight
by the Branch Staff, as discussed below.
1646 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1646
Phone/FAX: [phone] I Internet: http://portal.ncdenr.org/weblwm
An Equal Opportunity I Affirmative Action Empioyer
One . North Carol ma
/Vaturall!J
Wright Chemical Corp.
Page 2
The Branch has a privatized oversight arm of the voluntary cleanup program known as the Registered
Environmental Consultant ("REC") program. Based on the responses provided on the questionnaire
(degree of hazard and public interest in the site). the Branch will determine whether a staff person or an
REC will perform the oversight and approval of your assessment and cleanup action. Please note that
having one or more of the conditions identified on the questionnaire does not necessarily preclude the site
for qualifying for an REC-directed cleanup action .
.-_.:;., ... ::rt 1·r.r;r~r.;i;·f:S ... '. i l(J0nj_!:[lt!"ie\~E_9'pr5Jg(~m; the volunteer hires an environmental consulting firm, which the State has
: approved·as·having met\cei-tain qualifications, to implement a cleanup and certify that the work is being i pJrformed in compliance with regulations. In other words, the REC's certifications of compliance are in
\ pl?ce of direct oversig½t\by the Branch. Details of the REC program can be found at
\ http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/wm/sf/ihs/recprogram. If you have any questions specific to the REC
\ P,rograr~}t~sJj/dirig.iiow.to participate, please contact the REC Program Manager, Kim Caulk, at (919)
101:8350. .
If the Branch determines that the site should be assessed and cleaned up with direct State oversight, it will
not be eligible for a REC-directed cleanup. Rather, the cleanup action will receive direct oversight by
Branch staff.
Failure of a responsible party to take the initial abatement steps required in 15A NCAC 2L may result in
the assessment ofa civil penalty against that responsible party. In addition, the Branch may seek an
injunction compelling compliance with the initial abatement steps required in 15A NCAC 2L. For future
work beyond the initial abatement steps required pursuant to 15A NCAC 2L, a unilateral Order may be
issued pursuant to N.C.G.S. 130A-3 I0.3 to compel assessment and cleanup.
If you have any questions, you may contact Bruce Parris, Western Regional Supervisor at (704) 235-
2185, John Walch, Eastern Regional Supervisor at [phone] or me at [phone]. You can
view a Branch regional map at http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/wm/sf/ihs/ihsregmap to determine if your site
lies in the western or eastern region. Those who are interested in reviewing the Superfund Section's files
on any of these sites may contact Scott Ross at [phone], to schedule an appointment. You may
also contact Mr. Ross if you do not have access to the internet and would like to request a copy of the
Priority List be mailed to you.
Sincerely, ~-y~
Charlotte V. Jesne£1. Head -
Inactive Hazardous Site Branch
Superfund Section
CV J/slbb(SPLMERGEL TR _20 I I .DOCX)
SA
NCDEMR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Waste Management
Beverly Eaves Perdue
Governor
July 27,201 I
Mr. W. E. Lewis, General Manager
Oak-Bark Corporation
333 Neils Eddy Road
Riegelwood, NC 28456
Dexter R. Matthews
Director
Re: Inactive Hazardous Waste Sites Priority List
Wright Chemical Corp.
Riegelwood, Columbus County
Dear Mr. Lewis:
Dee Freeman
Secretary
The site listed above has been included on the October 20 IO Inactive Hazardous Waste Sites Priority List
(Priority List) in accordance with North Carolina General Statutes Section 130A-3 I0.2. The Priority List
is a list of sites where uncontrolled disposal, spills, or releases of hazardous substances have been
identified. A special priority system (North Carolina Administrative Code Title ISA Subchapter 13C
Section 0.200) is used to rank the sites in decreasing order of danger to public health and the environment.
This letter is being sent to you to fulfill our statutory duty to notify those who own and those who at
present are known to be responsible for each site on the Priority List. A copy of the Priority List with
each site's rank appearing in the right-hand column is available at
http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/wm/sf/sfavailabledocs under the Site Inventory heading. This list is in
alphabetical order by site name to make it easier for you to locate your score.
Any responsible party that has not already done so, must take the initial abatement actions required under
North Carolina groundwater quality regulations (15A NCAC 2L). Pursuant to ISA NCAC 2L .0106(b),
any person conducting or controlling an activity which results in the discharge of a waste or hazardous
substance to the groundwater of the State, or in proximity thereto, shall take immediate action to
terminate and control the discharge, and mitigate any hazards resulting from exposure to the pollutants.
Pursuant to ISA NCAC 2L .0106(c), if groundwater standards have been exceeded, a responsible party
must take immediate action to eliminate the source or sources of contamination. Beyond initial abatement
actions, all assessment and cleanup will be done through the Inactive Hazardous Sites Response Act
(N.C.G.S. 130A-3 I0) authority.
Under the Inactive Hazardous Sites Response Act, persons who move forward to assess and clean up
contamination, without being compelled to do so through fonnal legal action filed against them, are called
"volunteers." To participate in the Inactive Hazardous Sites Branch's voluntary cleanup program, you will
be required to enter into an administrative agreement with the Branch. If a responsible party or owner
wishes to voluntarily perform a site cleanup, they should first complete a Site Cleanup Questionnaire
available at http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/wm/sf/sfavailabledocs under the Forms heading. The voluntary
cleanup will proceed through the Registered Environmental Consultant Program or under direct oversight
by the Branch Staff, as discussed below.
1646 Mail Service Center. Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1646
Phone: [phone] I FAX: [phone] I Internet: httpllportal.ncdenr.org/weblwm
An Equal Opportunity\ Affirmative Action Employer
One . North Carol ma /Va tu rally
Wright Chemical Corp.
Page 2
The Branch has a privatized oversight arm of the voluntary cleanup program known as the Registered
Environmental Consultant ("REC") P.rogram. Based on the responses provided on the questionnaire
(degree of hazard and public interest in the site), the Branch will determine whether a staff person or an
REC will perform the oversight and approval of your assessment and cleanup action. Please note that
having one or more of the conditions identified on the questionnaire does not necessarily preclude the site
for qualifying for an REC-directed cleanup action.
Under the REC program, the volunteer hires an environmental consulting firm, which the State has
approved as having met certain qualifications, to implement a cleanup and certify that the work is being
performed in compliance with regulations. In other words, the REC's certifications of compliance are in
place of direct oversight by the Branch. Details of the REC program can be found at
http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/wm/sf/ihs/recprogram. If you have any questions specific to the REC
Program, including how to participate, please contact the REC Program Manager, Kim Caulk, at (919)
508-8451.
If the Branch determines that the site should be assessed and cleaned up with direct State oversight, it will
not be eligible for a REC-directed cleanup. Rather, the cleanup action will receive direct oversight by
Branch staff.
Failure of a responsible party to take the initial abatement steps required in I SA NCAC 2L may result in
the assessment of a civil penalty against that responsible party. In addition, the Branch may seek an
injunction compelling compliance with the initial abatement steps required in I SA NCAC 2L. For future
work beyond the initial abatement steps required pursuant to I SA NCAC 2L, a unilateral Order may be
issued pursuant to§ I 30A-3 l 0.3 to compel ass~ssment and cleanup.
lfyou have any questions, you may contact Bruce Parris, Western Regional Supervisor at (704) 235-
2185, John Walch, Eastern Regional Supervisor at [phone] or me at [phone]. You can
view a Branch regional map at http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/wm/sf/ihs/ihsregmap to determine if your site
lies in the western or eastern region. Those who are interested in reviewing the Superfund Section's files
on any of these sites may contact Scott Ross at [phone], to schedule an appointment. You may
also contact Mr. Ross if you do not have access to the internet and would like to request a copy of the
Priority List be mailed to you.
Sincerely,
C~n~
Inactive Hazardous Site Branch
Superfund Section
CV J/slbb(SPLMERGEL TR_ 20 IO.DOCX)
MA
NCDEMR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Waste Management
Beverly Eaves Perdue
Governor
July 27,201 I
Hexion Specialty Chemicals
Attn: President
130 E. Broad Street
Columbus, OH 43215
Dexter R. Matthews
Director
Re: Inactive Hazardous Waste Sites Priority List
Wright Chemical Corp.
Riegelwood, Columbus County
Dear Sir or Madam:
Dee Freeman
Secretary
The site listed above has been included on the October 2010 Inactive Hazardous Waste Sites Priority List
(Priority List) in accordance with North Carolina General Statutes Section 130A-3 I 0.2. The Priority List
is a list of sites where uncontrolled disposal, spills, or releases of hazardous substances have been
identified. A special priority system (North Carolina Administrative Code Title I SA Subchapter 13C
Section 0.200) is used to rank the sites in decreasing order of danger to public health and the environment.
This letter is being sent to you to fulfill our statutory duty to notify those who own and those who at
present are known to be responsible for each site on the Priority List. A copy of the Priority List with
each site's rank appearing in the right-hand column is available at
http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/wm/sf/sfavailabledocs under the Site Inventory heading. This list is in
alphabetical order by site name to make it easier for you to locate your score.
Any responsible party that has not already done so, must take the initial abatement actions required under
North Carolina groundwater quality regulations (ISA NCAC 2L). Pursuant to ISA NCAC 2L .0106(b),
any person conducting or controlling an activity which results in the discharge of a waste or hazardous
substance to the groundwater of the State, or in proximity thereto, shall take immediate action to
terminate and control the discharge, and mitigate any hazards resulting from exposure to the pollutants.
Pursuant to 15A NCAC 2L .0 I 06(c), if groundwater standards have been exceeded, a responsible party
must take immediate actior:i to eliminate the source or sources of contamination. Beyond initial abatement
actions, all assessment and cleanup will be done through the Inactive Hazardous Sites Response Act
(N.C.G.S. 130A-310) authority.
Under the Inactive Hazardous Sites Response Act, persons who move forward to assess and clean up
contamination, without being compelled to do so through formal legal action filed against them, are called
"volunteers." To participate in the Inactive Hazardous Sites Branch's voluntary cleanup program, you will
be required to enter into an administrative agreement with the Branch. If a responsible party or owner
wishes to voluntarily perform a site cleanup, they should first complete a Site Cleanup Questionnaire
available at http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/wm/sf/sfavailabledocs under the Forms heading. The voluntary
cleanup will proceed through the Registered Environmental Consultant Program or under direct oversight
by the Branch Staff, as discussed below.
1646 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1646
Phone: [phone] I FAX: [phone] I Internet: http://portaLncdenr.org/web/wm
An Equal Opportunity\ Affirmative Action Em~yer
OnehC . Nort arohna ;Naturally
Wright Chemical Corp.
Page 2
The Branch has a privatized oversight arm of the voluntary cleanup program known as the Registered
Environmental Consultant ("REC") program. Based on the responses provided on the questionnaire
(degree of hazard and public interest in the site), the Branch will determine whether a staff person or an
REC will perform the oversight and approval of your assessment and cleanup action. Please note that
having one or more of the conditions identified on the questionnaire does not necessarily preclude the site
for qualifying for an REC-directed cleanup action.
Under the REC program, the volunteer hires an environmental consulting firm, which the State has
approved as having met certain qualifications, to implement a cleanup and certify that the work is being
performed in compliance with regulations. In other words, the REC's certifications of compliance are in
place of direct oversight by the Branch. Details of the REC program can be found at
http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/wm/sf/ihs/recorogram. If you have any questions specific to the REC
Program, including how to participate, please contact the REC Program Manager, Kim Caulk, at (919)
508-8451.
If the Branch determines that the site should be assessed and cleaned up with direct State oversight, it will
not be eligible for a REC-directed cleanup. Rather, the cleanup action will receive direct oversight by
Branch staff.
Failure of a responsible party to take the initial abatement steps required in I SA NCAC 2L may result in
the assessment ofa civil penalty against that responsible party. In addition, the Branch may seek an
injunction compelling compliance with the initial abatement steps required in ISA NCAC 2L. For future
work beyond the initial abatement steps required pursuant to I SA NCAC 2L, a unilateral Order may be
issued pursuant to§ I 30A-3 I 0.3 to compel assessment and cleanup.
If you have any questions, you may contact Bruce Parris, Western Regional Supervisor at (704) 235-
2185, John Walch, Eastern Regional Supervisor at [phone] or me at [phone]. You can
view a Branch regional map at http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/wm/sf/ihs/ihsregmap to determine if your site
lies in the western or eastern region. Those who are interested in reviewing the Superfund Section's files
on any of these sites may contact Scott Ross at [phone], to schedule an appointment. You may
also contact Mr. Ross if you do not have access to the internet and would like to request a copy of the
Priority List be mailed to you.
Sincerely,
C~n~
Inactive Hazardous Site Branch
Superli.md Section
CVJ/slbb(SPLMERGEL TR_ 20 IO.DOCX)
*lIHS*
*llHS*
Site Name (Subject):
Site ID (Document ID): ,
Document Name (DocType):
Report Segment:
Date of Document:
Date Received:
Box: Enter SF and# with no spaces
Access Level:
Division:
Section:
Program (Document Group):
Document Category:
r --..
: Print Report for
11 · :Record " I . , •
'
· 0 do to'. N~;,, '
'Blank R~~cird. , •'-:!•
,WRIGHT CHEMICAL CORP. ----
NCD024766719
icorresp~~dence (C)
5/12/2011
Public
[Waste Management ---
:superfund
IHS (IHS)
Facility '------
•. ·~« :'· :'.: ,. ·' .•
,Go to New Record·, •
(d~f~ult to lasf ·.
record values), .. ; . ,, . ' ' ', ..
i,iS,,'\I
H"'.~ ~-
i
\
I ' I
\ .
.. \_
\
/
. /(\/ ·-,_
I -, . : , I
L__ -! '. ' I
t
' '
I ; I l : \ . / .
' \ /.·' '-. r . / ....__. _____ ..... __ ,,,.·
'. '' ' '.
' '.
,--~
D D
/
,
r
!
I '
/
"" ·-..
_/' , "' ~ ' I ;
l i :
'-)i
" ,{/ ! ·, ' . ' I ' c.._j
!"' "'
\
' t------_J
I I
/ .//
L
, ,.
f ------,_
L___.
\ '-._ /
------------
t r---~_:
I -. ·-... _
. ' '·. -~ . . ·.
I -. ,
-~
!~-----::--,,
ii ,,
ii ,,
' ,, .,
d
...
., .. .:::....'.!..1....1'!...~=
-·
.,
! i !
, I Ii ' I' ''
\
·--..__
•.
\
\
/
/ ,(
. , I I , ,•
_I
-=------
=
7'
~
'-.,
-4
" ..
~
<f
' --,---'
,_ .... _
..,.
--....s;:
~
v\
d
~ cl
'-cS
-6
I
\
..J' -c,
«;
cl --
\ .,-\;'<:>)
~ ~~~-~
~~~
I
\
\ \
-6
C
',
\
G
'--
'
\
\
\
\
\
,,,,.,,,,
6
0/
\
APFRC,\, EO BY,
\... /-·
fEYISEO
*lIHS*
i*llHS*
Site Name (Subject):
Site ID (Document ID):
Document Name (DocType):
Report Segment:
Date of'Document:
Date Received:
Box: Enter SF and# with no spaces
Access Level:
Division:
Section:
Program (Document Group):
Document Category:
'.WRIGHT CHEMICAL CORP.
l_t-l~~D24766719
1corresp~~denc~ (C} ·· I. . . .. -··· ·-··· -········ ....
r .. --·-·· _____ ,. _______ . --·------····------·----
IS/12/2011
i-·······--. ------.. •·•---... , .. , ........ ,.,... '"
I_Waste rvl~_na~emen.t ___ _
[Superfund
!IHS (IHS)
'Facility --'----
----··············-
Sherrill Environmental, Inc.
Environmental and Geologic Services
May 12, 2011
Ginny Henderson, P.G.
Inactive Hazardous Sites Branch
Superfund Section
Wilmington Regional Office
127 Cardinal Dr. Ext.
Wilmington, NC 28405-2845
Subject: ENVIRONMENT AL MONITORING
CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN
OAK-BARK CORPORATION
I st EVENT 2011
Dear Ms. Henderson:
ro)~~~~~~ij lllll MAY 16 2011 ilW
SUPERFUND SECTION
On behalf of the Oak-Bark Corporation, Sherrill Environmental, Inc. is pleased to submit
this report of Environmental Monitoring in conformance with the Corrective Action Plan
for the Wright facility located in Riegelwood, NC. Please find enclosed one bound copy
of the report.
If you have any questions, or need additional information, please contact us at (919)
493-6555 or Red Lewis at [phone] Ext. 5205.
Sincerely,
Sherrill Environmental, Inc.
~~
John (Jack) Sherrill, L.G.
3326 Rugby Rd. • Durham • NC 27707
. ph. 919•493•6555 fax. 919•493•6554 cell. 919•4 l 8•3894 e-mail. [e-mail]
RA
NCDEHR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Waste Management
Beverly Eaves Perdue
Governor
Dexter R. Matthews
December 9, 2009
Mr. W. E. Lewis, General Manager
Oak-Bark Corporation
333 Neils Eddy Road
Riegelwood, NC 28456
Re: Inactive Hazardous Waste Sites Priority List
Wright Chemical Corp.
Riegelwood, Columbus County
Dear Mr. Lewis:
Director
Dee Freeman
,Secretary
The site listed above has been included on the October 2009 Inactive Hazardous Waste Sites Priority List (Priority
List) in accordance with North Carolina General Statutes Section 130A-3 l 0.2. The Priority List is a list of sites
where uncontrolled disposal, spills, or releases of hazardous substances have been identified. A special priority
system (North Carolina Administrative Code Title ISA Subchapter 13C Section 0.200) is used to rank-the sites in
decreasing order of danger to public health and the environment. ·
This letter is being sent to· you to fulfill our statutory duty to notify those who own and those who at present are
known to be responsible for each site on the Priority List. A copy of the Priority List with each site's rank appearing
in the right-hand column is attached. This list is in alphabetical order by site name to make it easier for you_ to ..
locate your score.
Any responsible party that has not already done so, must take the initial abatement actions required under North
Carolina groundwater quality regulations (ISA NCAC 2L). Pursuant to 15A NCAC 2L .0106(b), any person
conducting or controlling an activity which results in the discharge of a waste or hazardous substance to the
groundwater of the State, or in proximity thereto, ~hall take immediate action to terminate and control the discharge,
and mitigate any hazards resulting from exposure to the pollutants. Pursuant to ISA NCAC 2L .0106(c), if
groundwater standards have been exceeded, a resp'onsible party must take immediate action to eliminate the source
or sources of contamination. Beyond initial abatement actions, all assessment and cleanup will be done through the
Inactive Hazardous Sites Response Act (N.C.G.S. BOA-310) authority. ·
I . . '
Under the Inactive Hazardous Sites Response Act,'persons who move forward to assess and clean up
contamination, without being compelled to do. so through formal legal action filed against them, are called
"volunteers." To participate in the Inactive Hazardous Sites Branch's voluntary cleanup program, you will be
required to enter into an administrative agreement with the Branch. If a responsible party or owner wishes to
voluntarily perform a site cleanup, they should first complete a Site Cleanup Questionnaire available at
http://www.wastenotuc.org/sfhome/SiteCleanupOuestionnaire.htrn. The voluntary cleanup will proceed through the
Registered Environmental Consultant Program or under direct oversight by the Branch Staff, as discussed below.
The Branch has a privatized oversight arm of the voluntary cleanup program known as the Registered
Environmental Consultant ("REC") program. Based on the responses provided on the questionnaire ( degree of
hazard and public interest in the site), the Branch will determine whether a staff person or an REC will perform the
oversight and approval of your assessment and cleanup action. Please note that having one or more of the
conditions identified on the questionnaire does not necessarily preclude the site for qualifying for an REC-directed
cleanup action.
1646 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1646
Phone: [phone] \ FAX: [phone] I Internet: www.wastenotnc.org
Oile . Nc>rthCm·olina ;Vatt,ral!y
An Equal Opportunity I Affirmative Action Employer
Wright Chemical Corp.
Page 2
Under the REC program, the volunteer hires an environmental consulting firm, which the State has approved as
having met certain qualifications, to implement a cleanup and certify that the work is being performed in compliance
with regulations. In other words, the REC's certifications of compliance are in place of direct oversight by the
Branch. Details of the REC program can be found at http://www.wastenotnc.org/sfhome/recprog.htm. If you have
any questions specific to the REC Program, including how to participate, please contact the REC Program Manager,
Kim Caulk, at [phone].
If the Branch determines that the site should be assessed and cleaned up with direct State oversight, it will not be
eligible for a REC-directed cleanup. Rather, the cleanup action will receive direct oversight by Branch staff.
Failure of a responsible party to take the initial abatement steps required in 15A NCAC 2L may result in the
assessment of a civil penalty against that responsible party. In addition, the Branch may seek an injunction
compelling compliance with the initial abatement steps required in 15A NCAC 2L. For.future work beyond the
initial abatement steps required pursuant to 15A NCAC 2L, a unilateral Order may be issued pursuant to§ 130A-
3 I 0.3 to compel assessment and cleanup.
If you have any questions, you may contact Bruce Parris, Western Regional Supervisor at [phone], John
Walch, Eastern Regional Supervisor at [phone] or me at [phone]. You can view a Branch regional
map at http://www.wastenotnc.org/sfhome/JHSB RegionalMap.htm to determine if your site lies in the western or
eastern region. Those who are interested in reviewing the Superfund Section's files on any of these sites may
contact Scott Ross at [phone], to schedule an appointment.
Charlotte V. Jesnec ead
Inactive Hazardous te Branch
Superfund Section
CV J /SI b( SPL\!ERGEL TR_ 2009. WPD)
Enclosure
MA
'NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Waste Management
Beverly Eaves Perdue
Governor
Dexter R. Matthews
December 9, 2009
Hexion Specialty Chemicals
Attn: President
130 E. Broad Street
Coh1mbus, OH 43215
Re: Inactive Hazardous Waste Sites Priority List
Wright Chemical Corp.
Riegelwood, Columbus County
Dear Sir or Madam:
Director
Dee Freeman
Secretary
The site listed above has been included on the October 2009 Inactive Hazardous Waste Sites Priority List (Priority
List) in accordance with North Carolina General Statutes Section 130A-3 I0.2. The Priority List is a list of sites
where uncontrolled disposal, spills, or releases of hazardous substances have been identified. A special priority
system (North Carolina Administrative Code Title ISA Subchapter 13C Section 0.200) is used to rank the sites in
decreasing order of danger to public health and the environment.
This letter is being sent to you to fulfill our statutory duty to notify those who own and those who at present are
known to be responsible for each site on the Priority List. A copy of the Priority List with each site's.rank appearing
in the right-hand column is attached. This list is in alphabetical order by site name to make it easier. for you to
locate your score. · '
Any responsible party that has not already done so, must take the initial abatement actions required under North
Carolina groundwater quality regulations (ISA NCAC 2L). Pursuant to 15A NCAC 2L .0I06(b), any person
conducting or controlling an activity which results in the discharge of a waste or hazardous substance to the
groundwater of the State, or in proximity thereto, shall take immediate action to.terminate and control the discharge,
and mitigate any hazards resulting from exposure to the pollutants. Pursuant to I 5A NCAC 2L .0 I 06( c ), if
groundwater standards have been exceeded, a responsible party must take immediate action to eliminate the source
or sources of contamination. Beyond initial abatement actions, all assessment and cleanup will be done through the
Inactive Hazardous Sites Response Act (N.C.G.S. 130A-3 IO) authority.
Under the Inactive Hazardous Sites Response Act, persons who move forward to assess and clean up
contamination, without being compelled to do so through formal legal action filed against them, are called ·
"volunteers." To participate in the Inactive Hazardous Sites Branch's voluntary cleanup program, you will be
required to enter into an administrative agreement with the Branch. If a responsible party or owner ·wishes to
voluntarily perform a site cleanup, they should first complete a Site Cleanup Questionnaire available at
http://www.wastenotnc.org/sfhome/SiteCleanupOuestionnaire.htm. The voluntary cleanup will proceed through the
Registered Environmental Consultant Program or under direct oversight by the Branch Staff, as discussed below.
The Branch has a privatized oversight arm of the voluntary cleanup program known as the Registered·
Environmental Consultant ("REC") program. Based on the responses provided on the questionnaire (degree of
hazard and public interest in the site), the Branch will determine whether a staff person or an REC will perform the
oversight and approval of your assessment and cleanup action. Please note that having one or more of the
conditions identified on the questionnaire does not necessarily preclude the site for qualifying for an REC-directed
cleanup action.
1646 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1646
Phone: [phone] I FAX: [phone] \ Internet: www.wastenotnc.org
An Equal Opportunity\ Affirmative Action Employer
Wright Chemical Corp.
Page2
Under the REC program, the volunteer hires an environmental consulting firm, which the State has approved as
having met certain qualifications, to implement a cleanup and certify that the work is being performed in compliance
w_ith regulations. In other words, the REC' s certifications of compliance are in place of direct oversight by the
Branch. Details oftlie REC program can be found at http://www.wastenotnc.org/sthome/recprog.htm. If you have
any questions specific to the REC Program, including how to participate, please contact the REC Program Manager,
Kim Caulk, at (9 I 9) 508-8451.
If the Branch determines that the site should be assessed and cleaned up with direct State oversight, it will not be
eligible for a REC-directed cleanup. Rather, the cleanup action will receive direct oversight by Branch staff.
Failure of a responsible party to take the initial abatement steps required in 15A NCAC 2L may result in the
assessment of a civil penalty against that responsible party. In addition, the Branch may seek an injunction
compelling compliance with the initial abatement steps required in 15A NCAC 2L.. For future work beyond the
initial abatement steps required pursuant to 15A NCAC 2L, a unilateral Order may be issued pursuant to § I 30A-
3 I0.3 to compel assessment and cleanup.
If you have any questions, you may contact Bruce Parris, Western Regional Supervisor at [phone], John
Walch, Eastern Regional Supervisor at [phone] or me at [phone]. You can view a Branch regional
map at http://www.wastenotnc.org/sfhome/lHSB Regiona!Map.htm to determine if your site lies in the _western or
eastern region. Those who are interested in reviewing the Superfund Section's files on any of these sites may
contact Scott Ross at [phone], to schedule an appointment.
Sincerely; .
CkJitl"
· Charlotte V. Jesnec
Inactive Hazardous
Superfund Section
CV J/slb( sPLMERGELTR_200,.WPo)
Enclosure
• /i~:>f\~;11},
\~ :_' I •t ,: "' £)
~, ,~o-l v\lrl'f ,~ .~~ ... '\~.-.~~~t.•·••'
State of North Carolina
•
Department of Enviro11ment, Health, and Natural Resources
Division of Solid Waste Management
P.O. Ilox 27687 · Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687
.I a mes CJ. 1v1 artin 1 Governor
William W. Cobey, Jr., Secretary
Mr. Dann Dettman
Governmer1tal Affairs Officer
Wright Corporation
P.O. Box 402
Riegel.wood, N.C. 28456
l\ugust 23, 1990
RE: Formaldehyde Spill -July 30, 1990
Dear Mr. Dettman:
William L. Meyer
Director
In rev:i.ew of yo·c1r lette1· of l\ugust 17, 1990, this office offers the
following comments:
-Tl1e spillage of commercial grade formaldehyde meets the definition
of listed hazardous waste Ul22, in that it is a discarded commercial
cl1emical product, which can no longer be ttsed for its intended
purpose.
-l\s part of emergency response efforts, 40 CFR 265.l(c)(ll) provides
for the immediate treatment and containment of hazardous waste
without complying with the RCRA disposal requirements of this part.
-l\s part of this immediate response, the formaldehyde was rendered
11on-hazardous by treating it with ammoniu1n hydroxide.
-The release was not from a RCR!\ regulated unit (i.e., surface
impoundment, waste tank, etc.).
Subsequently, the storage and ·di. sposal of the noted non-hazardous
material is not regulated tinder RCR!\, but sl1ould be coordinated
through the Division ~f Environmental Management since you would be
involving the wastewater treatment system. Now that immediate
response efforts are complete, any area(s) of contamination that may
co11tain residual levels of formaldehyde should be managed as Ul22
hazardous waste and manifested off-site.
S:i.ncerely,
/ . 7". ,(/£,,, ... ,' P,,=: __ _ 17··'···t.7•~··~ , ....
~ierome H. Rhodes, Cl1ief
Hazardous Waste Section
CC: Do'Gg Holyfield
Preston Howard
Flint Worrell
• • WRIGHT CORPORATION
Mr. Preston Howard
Regional Supervisor
NCDEHNR-DEM
7225 Wrightsville Avenue
Wilmington, NC 28403-3695
Dear Mr. Howard:
August 24, 1990
if.':it;i::-:~rto\l n::;:;iC•J;;;i '-
. :,;. -~
In accordance with NCGS 143-215. 84 (a), we hereby request through you approval for use of 2% ammonium hydroxide for neutralization of formaldehyde in the event of a spill in the future requiring
immediate response and treatment. Ammonium hydroxide, when applied to formaldehyhde, results in the formation of hexamine. We feel this spill response procedure is the best method for neutralizing formald~hyde, which cannot be collected in liquid form, such as that which maj seep into sand or soil. By forming hexamine the material is far less toxic and the odors are reduced, thereby, minimizing exposure and making clean-up and handling safer and easier.
The toxicity of hexamine was explored and published in an article by Galmoka and Galmoka in Environmental Protection Engineering Vol. 10 No.3 in 1984. They reported hexamine concentrations at 5000 ppm before seeing any effects in fish, and 100 ppm showed no effect on water fleas, even after 48 hours exposure.
In light of the reduced toxicity of hexamine towards both humans and animals, Wright Corporation requests permission to use ammonium hydroxide in necessary quantities to react with formaldehyde in the event of unrecoverable spills~ which may ocCur on our property in the future.
Since_rely,
WRIGHT CORPORATION
ll~~ ~~
Dann Dettman
Governmental Affairs Officer
DD:nl
P.O. BOX 402 RIEGELWOOD, N.C. 28456 TELEPHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
• •
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
Wilmington Rcb~Onal Office
James C. Martin, Covcrnor
William W. Cobey, Jr, Secretctry
Bob Jamieson
Regional Manager
DIVISION OF ENVJRJNl1ENI'AL MANAGEMENT
Mr. Ce.n Cettmm
Wright Chemical Corporation
P. 0. Box 402
Riegelwcxx1, North carol:ina 28456
D2ar Mr. Cetman:
November 28, 1990
Subject: Resp::mse to Your September 7, 1990
letter
Forrraldehyde Spill
Wright Chemical Corporation
Acrre
Columbus County
We have received your September 7, 1990 letter in which you state your concern
about your analyses results arrl the, problem of distinguishing between hexamine arrl
forrraldehyde. We are =ently consulting with our lal:oratory staff on this matter
ard do not consider this issue closed. As soon as we receive an opinion ard
possible solution frcrn our sta£f chemists, we will contact you an::l request specific
steps which should be taken at this site. Until then, any further action on your
part concerning the subject spill can be held in abeyance. ·
If you have any questions, call ID2 at [phone].
KW-1/lfc
==\...-~ w~
Kirk W. McDonald, P.G.
Hydrogeolcgist
7125 Wrigfw;villc Avenue, ·Wilmingwn. N.C. 18-\03-3696 • lCkphonc 919-256--1161 • Fax 919-256-Sm
• •
ATTACHMENT C
MAP LOCATING .SAMPLING STATIONS
1 ::---:::.'--.:
' ~
Industrial
Waste Ponds
\ \ ! ···· .• '.\ 1 ;·
Cem / (
j
L .. --------~---~-·~---......... . : ..... ,
WRIGHT CORPORAT/0/V
7/31/9o 511MPUN6 $1A-r10,US
I IA/I .-:'._
\
I
-~ . '"---.
t 7
N
POLLUTION IN~ENT /U.S.T. LEAK REP~TING FORM
2) lnciden.1 # _____ _
Division o! Env:ronmenlal Managemenl
GROUNDWATER SECTION
2. Tabuloto only TYPE OF ACTION
A
B
C
D
(C:E_merger)cy Response 3. Complaint Investigation 5. U.S.T. L00\<
?.. Compliance lnvosligotion a Raulino Inventory 6. Othor:
l'OTtNTIAL H/\Zf,RDS: C~)axic Chemicals 2 lladiaoctivily ~Ir fmmlssloris 4. Exploslvos 5. Fire
INCIDENT DESCRIPTION
lncident Location/Nome
Adciress
Briefly Describe in'<:'ident 1( j . /1. ,1, / I I. I I r--\l Vr'J G VI. e. rro r (' a V :-.. e. C 0~ i'\ r) ,.,J~-r A I ! af Ct r/t:10 r:.a,.,,,...._ 'y-ruc. '.
Dalo lncideni
Occurred or Leak
Detected
If L.U.S.T., How Leak
v,.ras Detected
1. Tank G auglng 5. lnlorsntial Monitoring (vother S:P; //
2. Vapor Monitoring 6. Tank Removal
3. GW t✓,anltarlng 7. Tightnoss Test
4. Contractor V.tr\o lightness tested. removed tonk, or Installed look
detec1ion system.
PERSON REPORTING INCIDENT
Name ~1, ~e~J1~1aV\ I Da\·o 7-~1-9o \ lime c;: 3 /~1\
Company/Agency \iJ,;,,~i C \,~ ,,,, :c~ ! I Telephone GSS-2'2&3
REPORTED BY: 1. Tonk owne)]'operotor 2. Government agency 3. Private qrd) party
0aciliiy owner (Non-L.U.S.T.) 5. Other:
' .
RECOMMENDED ACTION
(MULTIPLE CHOICES POSSIBLE)
· GJniliote/complote cleanup 1. Investigation complete 5. Drilling support-7. Confirm leak
2. Continue Investigation ~. Lang-term remedial action 6. lssuo NOV 6. Moniloring pion
Comments E 1 Cava ic con J.a WI r,1 q fcj <:'.,: / ' i-1-/czo,JoJc._ (;J,,/4 /<, rcu,c h s /J l,),.JQ I
~Cose.I.'" sfucf,;~,5:; rb~-,<,a,,,1 /r:; oJ j-1,c ;c,ve,,, / <Vtcov, /r.0-"' ; le,
~ i ,>," De H \"\V<v\ -\u r~\\~ d-(.lh•(,:ql
CLEANUP LE!(S
1. Responsible Parly S~e Priority 60 I<-;,---K, M ,':t,~_,alol.
/M,t_W
Ranking
2. State
D.E.M. Regional Contact Signatu~v Dote
Q,c_k S~;vcr-~-:I 1y c;?-~-c;o
"
c::::::::: \--. 11 I J \ r-
j
l)
J j-r
V) C .c J.
.J 0 c J:
CJ
•
•
§
I (\J 'I
I . , j
.~~-: ~ J
C vi
0
':1
\)
\)
(' .
~
J
J
J
r
\
1
.j"".
~
D
8
}
_)
J
'.-1
0
\J
--' d
I
0 r
OJ
d
V,
0 v
J w
D
V'
r
I-
C
0
C
0
J <
V
s
I I r· 1 ,_, I -
\.) \) 0
-

0

, U -S 0
L! L) <
0]. j
,) I 1; \ u, . I
v I I ; I _J I
·,
IJ.
\Jj
_0
I I .,-
d -c;-
\) ,...,
,-
"-v
0 v
N
tr
'/1 _s,
1r! "· I C r,
\) I
<( u u
0
V)
C
0
0
0 I cf:
J \}
11 -(f
0 p
I
d v
\,J
\j
I . ,-
C
J
V.
I. '! t id,k,J,c • m ··: i
I I
l_
·. . . ~e+rf"-•--
. . . . . , .
J:,. _
_ I.·
l 'i· .. : C·.,
-'.'<
. ·:.~,,~. :<.:J \.) f __ ~_/> .·. ·,;;,J.~.:5 .. ··.:'-.. c!. ·.qr·a_·ve. .. ·';/·• • · · ·.··1.:(· .--.... . oJ.·. 5.o,'/ \. , ..
--· ---\~~(-~;b
\ !. .I "-• ., c 0~ I 'er' \
•
7-3o-</O ·-
• •
ATTACHMENT E
RESULTS OF LABORATORY ANALYSES
AND LIVINGSTON CREEK BIOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT
REPORT
• •
Diviaion of Enviro0111ental Management
For Investigation of
Samples collected and llM1 tonu completed by:
Station.
No.
Re
Rel Rec by
Rel Rec by (Lab)
thod of Shi ment:
LAB USE ONLY
Lab No. No.
From Throuah Container• Arullvais Relinauished bv
lti/,J':?i\c,::; /J (I/ 3~ }I) q I'." nl 1 '/,.g1,() y,:;, 'fJ (}/ ~ -•
fJ&)J, l)o 4 01J3<?1~ CJ I'. 1/. w:' v:i ½fin) 1111' r/}f ,/ _J ,,>' C
'
/
t--fJJ1tv.
,,,f 0
No. of
Time Bottle•
I :31J z_
;/; z.. l,
JI: 'f( 2. //: vB z
I l :tJ 'l
/l ;zJJ z
I: );O z
: i,( z
z,
Received bv Date/ Time
.{j 'nu;,./,, . . ,_. ?.-1 L? (l ,9,35An1
I ,\
V ..-:1< (,~ ,;.i._,_c;,. '":,,~ .,
;
I
I .
I
I
I
I ~--·
I ;_ I
RECI= IVED,
/\HG :s 1990
W,lmlngton Regional OffiCll
DEM ~ t ~ ··-•• i
~8.i~Y~[t'~·~;:r~:Ji)'id~~;E,N'T~:~ MANAGEMENT
. · ~ocf.~h C.t:Jt t,,/11 r5 U)
WATER' QUALITY
0
FIELD-LAB FORM (DMl) cfi) For Lab Use ONLY
Lab Number: ('? u/, --y 9 /} Cj
~ BASIN f~H .e rt /!fl .. __
REPORT TO: ARO FRO MRO RHO WaRO WlllO ;\IJSRO TS
AT BM ',.__/
Other
~·
Shipped by: Bu{ Courief, Stilff, Other __ ·--,,'~-----
COLLECTOR(S)~/ t(J,.,( ( ,,1-/Y)t;/ f /JdJI r; ,.
Estimated BOD Range: 0-5/5-25/25-65/40-130 or 100 plus
Seed: Yes D No0 Chlorinated: Yes D No □
PRIORITY
4'}MBIENT
0r\;PLIANCE
~EMERGENCY
□/QA
52) CHAIN
OF CUSTODY··
STATION LOCATION:
REMARKS:
I
SAMPLE TYPE ,
~ STREAM
□ LARE
□ESTUARY
/
I
/l)l!./(zc/1
□ □
EFFLUENT
INFLUENT
l!ofP.
DATE REPORTED:
I Statton ti I /Dq~)Be~IOy7m,'?f I I//.~ ~oin I Date End -:-ri~d Depth DM DB DBM !Value Type Composite ,1Sample ~
A H L T s B . c( G · GNXX
1 BODS 310 mg/I Chloride 940 mg/I J NH3 as N 610 L,,,1 mg/I LI-Lithium 1132 • 2 COD High 340 mg/I Chi a: Tri 32217 ug/1 J, TKN as N 625 ~.l mg/I Mg-Magnesium 927 .. -~,--·
3 COD Low 335 mg/I • Chi a: Corr 32209 ug/1 I N02 plus N03 as N 630 1,7 mg/I Mn-Manganese 1055 ug/1
4 Coliform: MF Fecal 31616 1100ml Pheophytin a 32213 ug/1 P: Total as P 665 mg/I Na-Sodium 929 mg/I
5 Coliform: MF Total 31504 1100ml Color: True 80 Pt-Co P04 as P 70507 mg/I Arsenfc:Total 1002 .• ug/1
6 Coliform: Tube Fecal 31615 /l00ml Color:(pH. I 83 ADMI P: D!ssolved as P 666 mg/I Se-Selenium 1147 ug/J ,. ..
Coliform: Fecal Strep 316J3 1100ml Color: pH 7 .6 82 -. ADMI
-Hg-Mercury 71900 ug/1
7 -
8 Residue: Total 500 mg/I Cyanide 720 mg/I Cd-Cadmium 1027 ug/1 Organochlorine Pesticides
9 Volatile 505 mg/I , Fluoride 951 mg/I Cr-Chromlum:Total 1034 ug/1 Organophosphorus Pesticides
10 Fixed 510 mg/I ,I Formaldehyde 71880 q mg/I Cu-Copper 1042 '"' ug/1
11 Residue: Suspended 530 mg/I Grease and Oils 556 mg/I Ni-Nickel 1067 ug/1 Acid Herbicides
12 Volatile 535 mg/I Hardness Total 900 mg/] Pb-Lead 1051 ug/1
13 Fixed 540 mg/I Specific ConQ.,95. __ uMhos/cm 2 Zn-Zinc 1092 . ug/1 Base/ Neutral Extractable Organics
14 pH 403 units MBAS 38260 mg/I Acid Extr.ictable Organics
15 Acidity to pH 4.5 436 mg/I Phenols 32730 ug/1 Ag-Sliver 1077 ug/1
16 Acidity to pH 8.3 435 mg/I Sulfate 945 mg/I Al-Aluminum 1105 ug/1 Purgeable Organics {VOA bottle" •
17 Alkalinity to pH 8.3 415 mg/I Sulfide 745 mg/I Be-Beryllium 1012 ug/1
18 Alkalinity to pH 4.5 410 mg/I Ca-Calcium 916 mg/I
19 TOC 680 mg/I Co-Cobalt 1037 ug/1 .
20 Turbidity 76 NTU Fe-Iron 1045 ug/1 Phytoplankton
Sampling Point !:t Conductance at 25 C Water Temperature IC'. D.0. mg/l pti Alkalinity Acidity Air Temperature (C)
pH 8.3 pH 4.5 pH 4.5 pH 8.3
.. ..
2 ' 94 10 300 I• 400 I • 82244 431 82243 182242 20
Salinity 51; Preclpitlon On/day) Cloud'Cover !:t WI~~ Direction (Deg) Stream Flow Severity Turbidity Severity Wind Velocity M/H Mean_StreamR_{!, 11---a.-lV11:.--
' ... ' I .,. All'" ~ 199U 480 45 32 36 1351 1350 35 64 .-:i,
, DMl/Rl!vl.sed 10/86
For Lab Use ONLY
~ifiy1s.10N .oF CvrnoNMENTAL MANAGEMENT w AT~R, QUALITY FIELD-LAB FORM (DMl) /') ,. / -.zo
Lab Number:(.../;/(/ ___../ r":;> /0 .• /l/1) o,!)c, r ' v::6UNTY « v ,//(lo PRIORITY I.,_)
RIVER BASIN Cr'( /"'\
REPORT TO: ARO FRO MRO RRO WaRO~O/WSRO TS
AT BM
□AMBlENT
Other -'
Df oMPLIANCE
J 0 EMERGENCY
OF CUSTODY
Shipped by: Bus (ourle_~ 'tfff, Other
COLLECTOR(S), _..,.,{L/1 L (.J AJ-fhS· //J1-u1rs
Estimated BOD Range: 0-5/5·25/25-65/40-130 or 100 plus STATION LOCATION:
Seed: Yes D No □ Chlorinated: Yes D No □ REMARKS:
I Station # 2 IDSft Begin _(yy/mm/dd) I Tlme_Be;inl Date End o.07,3///.ftz ;--.
1 BODS 310 mg/I Chloride 940
2 COD High 340 mg/I Chi a: Tri 32217
3 COD Low 335 mg/I Chi a: Corr 32209
4 Coliform: MF Fecal 31616 1100ml Pheophytin a 32213
5 Coliform: MF Total 31504 /lOOml Color: True 80
6 Coliform: Tube Fecal 31615 1100ml Color:(pH ) 83
7 Coliform: Fecal Strep 31673 1100ml Color: pH 7 .6 82
8 Residue: Total 500 mg/I Cyanide 720
9 Volatile 505 mg/I I Fluoride 951
10 Fixed 510 mg/I ✓ Formaldehyde 71880 '-:\ i.3
11 Residue: Suspended 530 mg/I Grease and Oils 556
12 Volatile 535 mg/I Hardness Total 900
SAMPiE TYPE
I ' (5;3' STREAM
□ LAKE
□ESTUARY
□ □
EFFLUENT
INFLUENT
Date Received:-/ f)O g {j/
Rec'd u ·n Wi ,,,,..----, by: !JI , I, From: Bus-€:ourierlHand Del
DATA ENTRY BY: ,i.._-;
DATE REPORTED: i :, i
lj;i(
1Ti~d Depth OM DB DBM !Value Type Composite ISampleT~
' A H L T s B C ( G GNXX
mg/I \} NH3 as N 610 ~f-I/ mg/I Li-Lithium 1132 ug/1 , __
:., . ··-~ • ug/1 ,; TKN as N 625 -;:-;:; l·'i' mg/I Mg-Magnesium 927
ug/1 ,/ N02 plus N03 as N 630 ~ :".. mg/I Mn-Manganese 1055 ug/1
ug/1 P: Total as P 665 mg/I Na-Sodium 929 mg/I
Pt-Co P04 as P 70507 mg/I Arsenic:Total 1002 ug/1
ADMI P: Dissolved as P 666 mg/I Se-Selenium 1147 ug/1
ADMI Hg-Mercury 71900 ug/1
mg/I Cd-Cadmium 1027 ug/1 Organochlorine Pesticides
mg/I Cr-Chromium:Total 1034 ug/1 Omanophosphorus Pesticides
mg/I Cu-COppcr 1042 ug/1
mg/I NI-Nickel 1067 ug/1 Acid Herbicides
mg/I Pb-Lead 1051 ug/1
2 13 Fixed 540 mg/I Specific Cond. 95 uMhos/cm Zn-Zinc 1092 ug/1 Base/ Neutral Extractable Organics
14 pH 403 units MBAS 38260 mg/I .1-\cid Extractable Organics
15 Acidity to pH 4.5 436 mg/I Phenols 32730 ug/1 Ag-Silver 1077 ug/1
16 Acidity to pH 8.3 435 mg/I Sulfate 945 mg/I Al-Aluminum 1105 ug/1 Purgeable Organics (VOA bottle r.
17 Alkalinity to pH 8.3 415 mg/I Sulfide 745 mg/I Be-Beryllium 1012 ug/1
18 Alkalinity to pH 4.5 410 mg/I Ca-Calcium 916 mg/I
19 TOC 680 mg/I Co-Cobalt 1037 ug/1
20 Turbidity 76 NTU Fe-Iron 1045 ug/1 Phytoplankton
Sampling Point% Conductance at 25 C Water Temperature (C) D.0. mg/1 pH Alkalinity Acidity ~rTvEIY{C)
pH 8.3 pH 4.5 pH 4.5 pH 8.3 r-:>i:::-c ::.l' ::. ..)
,l ... -~-A
2 94 10 300 ,. 400 I • 82244 431 82243 182242 =· •:1on
Salinity % Precipition On/day) Cloud Cover % Wind Direction (Deg) Stream Flow Severity Turbidity Severity Wind Velocity M/H Mean Stream cfe_~jlft. 'ktwim OCrhlth ft.
h8"&ic11al Officq,
v,1; i: ;-, : 1 :~f .. L,n
480 45 32 36 1351 1350 35 64 r4;:•. ~-
, DMl/Revised 10/86
~j/a,\';;6iVISJ.ON,OFC,NVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT WATER QUALITY FIELD-LAB FORM (DMl)
• · .·,: · Y.J.1ls;_ O· \,colJNTY ___,..{)/ tJ/Y)rOt/ PRIORITY SAMPLE TYPE
RIVER BASIN . C p L,.. ~ □ □ I rf, REPORT TO: ARO FRO MRO RRO WaRo'wrno''wsRo TS AMBIENT ~A 1LJ STREAM
AT BM ~ D □ OMPLIANCE CHAIN LAKE
Other ~ OF CUSTODY □
· /_ ~) ) EMERGENCY ESTUARY Shipped by: Buf Cour!J!wr, aff, Other '--"" / . ,. I /J IL ,, '1 r COLLECTOR(S), ! I {///·ff> 7 / K-1, v,f, '7
,, !
Estimated BOD Range: 0-5/5·25/25·65/40-130 or 100 plus STATION LOCATION:
@
□ EFFLUENT
□ fNFUJENT
For Lab Use ONLY
~7{)/l s<{) 1 / 1 Cd-< L Date Received: V V I Time:'--' / .../ 7
Rec'd by: F//DW1 From: Bus~and Del
·1 ~-, "\ ' -,f.. '
_.,'· ·i CK: \ ,'.._) DATA ENTRY BY:
DATE REPORTED:
, ak /('~,vy·
Seed: Yes D No0 Chlorinate·d: Yes D No □ REMARKS:
I Station # --3 ,~e Begin (yy/mm~dd)' I Tlme,Begi!J.1 Date~ 1~End Depth DM DB DBM !Value Type Composite ISampl~
:,,J .tJ 7 , I /I-'/-~ . , / A H L T s B C G GNXX
1 BODS 310 mg/I Chloride 940 mg/I 'v / NH3 as N 610 E.;'' 5r\.,-:i mg/I Li-Lithium 1132 ug/1
2 COD High 340 mg/l Chi a: Tri 32217 ug/1 iii TKN as N 625 ~ -1 ,C) mg/I Mg-Magnesium 927 ~
3 COD Low 335 m$/I Chi a: Corr 32209 ug/1 J N02 plus N03 as N 630 ~-j, <jmg,O Mn-Manganese 1055 ug/1
4 Coliform: MF Fecal 31616 /tOOmI Plu:ophytin a 32213 ug/1 . P: Total as P 665 mg/I Na-Sodium 929 mg/I
5 Coliform: MF Total 31504 /lOOml Color: True 80 Pt·Co PO4 as P 70507 mg/I Arsenic:Total 1002 ug/1
6 Coliform: Tube Fecal 31615 /I00ml Color:(pH ) 83 ADMI P, Dissolved as P 666 mg/I Se-Selenium 1147 ug/1
7 Coliform: Fecal Strep 3}673 1100ml Color: pH 7 .6 82 ADM! . Hg-Mercury 71900 Llg/1-
. -
8 Residue: Total 500 mg/I Cyanide 720 mg/J Cd-Cadmium 1027 ug/1 Organochlorine Pesticides
9 Volatile 505 mg/I / Fluoride 951 mg/I Cr-Chromium:Total 1034 ug/1 OrganoP,:1osrilorns Pestiddes
10 Fixed 510 mg/I -J Formaldehyde 71880 i2i t.11 mg/I Cu-CoppeT 1042 ug/1
11 Residue: Suspended 530 mg/I Grease and Oils 556 mg/I Ni-Nickel 1067 ug/1 Acid Herbicides
12 Volatile 535 mg/I Hardness Total 900 mg/I Pb·Lead 1051 ug/1
13 Fixed 540 mg/I Specific Cond. 95 uMhos/cm 2 Zn·Zlnc 1092 ug/1 Base/ Neutral Extractable Organics
14 pH 403 units . MBAS 38260 mg/I Acid Extractable Organics
15 Acidity to pH 4.5 436 mg/I Phenols 32730 ug/1 Ag-Silver 1077 ug/1
16 Acidity to pH 8.3 435 mg/I Sulfate 945 mg/I Al·Alumlnum 1105 ug/1 Purgeable Organic.s {VOA bottle.
17 Alkalinity to pH 8.3 415 mg/I Sulfide 745 mg/I Be·Beryllium 1012 ug/1
18 Alkalinity to pH 4.5 410 mg/I Ca-Calcium 916 mg/I
19 TOC 680 mg/I Co-Cobalt 1037 ug/1
20 Turbidity 76 NTU Fe·lron 10.45 ug/1 Phytoplankton
Sampling Point% Conductance at 25 C !water Temperature (C D.O. mg/I pH Alkalinity Acidity Air Temperature (C)
pH 8.3 pH 4.5 pH 4.5 pH 8.3
,. .. 182242 -,.. w: E rvso 2 94 10 300 400 82244 431 82243 ~.-» .. -•. ,. 1_
Salinity % Precipltlon (In/day) Cloud Cover % Wind Direction (Deg) Stream Flow Severity Turbidity Severity Wind Velocity M/H t,,fenn Stream Depth ft. Stream Wklth ~
-f,' \1' 2 o 19 0
,. ; D
480 45 • 32 36 1351 1350 35 64 4 -··•'"'' OtficQ:
"·liL-,,;n i:t.011 Iv••·"
DMl/R.evlsed 10/86
~\YIJ_IVL,S.JON-OF NVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT WATER QUALITY
_v/vml3dS PRIORITY Q .-,
_ ='COUNTY ' -.
RIVER BASIN ~
REPORT TO: ARO FRO MRO RRO WaRO IRO{ySRO TS
AT BM
□AMBfENT □6A a CHAIN
FIELD-LAB FORM (DMl)
SAMPLE TYPE
□
□
EFFLUENT
INA..UENT Other
Shipped by: Bus~ taff, 0th er ____ 7),:,---c-
g/~MPLIANCE
62) EMERGENCY
OF CUSTODY I ·i;zi STREAM
□ LAKE
□ESTUARY
COLLECTOR(S), '--U/1 I/ / /J---/>1 <;, /e4 tl)( c;_
"· I Estimated BOD Range: 0-5/5·25/25-65/40-130 or 100 plus
I '
STATION LOCATION: ;rrf/ f
Seed: Yes D No □ Chlorinated: Yes D No □ REMARKS:
For Lab Use ONLY
Lab Number:
Date Received: 9 /} /) J3 (} / Tlme:(.0 1'"J 5
I I /' l , J ·---?' ---, Rec'd by: .H Y} M.,J From: Bus-eourie.,JHand Del
. 7 . --.. c:::::::.:---.-·
DATA ENTRY BY: l '·1.-·1 CK: \
DATE REPORTED:
I Station ti s ,~ Begin (yy/mm/dd), I Tim~ ,s;r:; I Date End. IT~d Depth OM DB DB!"'f 'Value Type Composite l Sample _JY-~ 0 ,07 ,?,,] )/· rn 1 1 , A H L T s B C(_ Gj GNXX /
1 BODS 310 mg/I Chloride 940 mg/J ' / NH3 as N 610 ·-·( 1 mg/I Li-Lithium 1132 ug/1
' I 2 COD High 340 mg/I Chi a: Tri 32217 ug/1 ) TKN as N 625 ; mg/I Mg-Magnesium 927
/. ' COD Low 335 mg-/1 Chi a: Corr 32209 ug/J I N02 plus N03 as N 630 ,:),(,.., mg/I Mn-Mangane:.e 1055 ug/1 3 .
' 4 Coliform: MF Fecal 31616 /lOOml Pheophytin a 32213 ug/1 P: Total as P 665 mg/I Na-Sodiu;n 929 mg/I
' 5 Coliform: MF Total 31504 /l00ml Color: True 80 Pt-Co P04 as P 70507 mg/I Arsenic:Total 1002 ug/1
6 Coliform: Tube Fecal 31615 /IOOml Color:(pH ) 83 AOMI P: Dissolved as P 666 mg/I Se-Selenium 1147 ug/1
7 Coliform: Fecal Strep 31673 /lO0ml Color: pH 7 .6 82 ADMI --Hg-Mercury 71900 ug/1
8 Residue: Total 500 mg/l Cyanide 720 mg/I Cd<::admium 1027 ug/1 Organochlorinc Pesticides
9 Volatile 505 mg/I I Fluoride 951 mg/I Cr-Chromlum:Total 1034 ug/1 Organophosphorus Pesticides
10 Fixed 510 mg/I ,/ Formaldeh~•de 71880 :1 ... , mg/I Cu-Copper 1042 ug/1
11 Residue: Suspended 530 mg/I Grease and Oils 556 mg/l Ni-Nickel 1067 ug/1 Acid Herbicides
12 Volatile 535 mg/I Hardness Total 900 mg/I Pb-Lead 1051 ug/1
13 Fixed 540 mg/I Specific Cond. 95 uMhos/cm 2 Zn·Zlnc 1092 ug/1 Ba!.e/ Neutral Extractable Orgdnics
14 pH 403 units MBAS 38260 mg/I Acid Extractable Organics
15 Acidity to pH 4.5 436 mg/I Phenols 32730 ug/1 Ag-Silver 1077 ug/1
16 Acidity to pH 8.3 435 mg/I Sulfate 945 mg/I Al·Alumlnum 1105 ug/1 Purgeable Organics (VOA .~ottl~ r.
17 Alkalinity t0 pH.8.3 415 mg/I Sulfide 745 mg/I Be-Beryllium 1012 ug/1
18 Alkalinity to pH 4.5 410 mg/I Ca-Calcium 916 mg/I
19 TOC 680 mg/I Co-Cobalt 1037 ug/1
20 Turbidity 76 NTU Fe-Iron 1045 ug/1 Phytoplankton
.
Sampling Point% Conductance at 25 C !water Temperature (C D.O. mg/1 pH Alkalinity Acidity Air Temperature IC)
pH 8.3 pH 4.5 pH 4.5 pH s:3
2 94 10 300 , ·. 400 I• 82244 431 82243 82242 """ ..,,,.... .:-; l v€.P
Salinity % Precipltion On/day) Cloud Cover % Wind Direction (Deg) Stream Flow Severity Turbidity Severity Wind Velocity M/H t,fean Stream Deptit ft 'SfreaITI Width ft. .0 0 ,~n r, 2 I Jj:;! fl. ll., '-' 480 45 32 36 1351 1350 35 64 4 -1 ('lif-i.C". • >~·-L'--
DMl/Revised 10/86
I
~J''DIVl~(ON OF')ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT WATER QUALITY FIELD-LAB FORM (DMl)
~-co-~~ L)9t (,11n/2/)9 PRIORITY O SAMPLE TYPE
RIVER BASIN ('.~f-( ..-. □ □ I d , AMBIENT QA IYJ STREAM REPORT TO: ARO FRO MRO RHO WaRO(WIRO/WSRO TS /
AT BM ·--·-A □ GbMPLJANCE ~ CHAIN □ LAKE.-
Other -----cc;;,=,--------------f Q OF CUSTODY D _ __,.-~ iJlJ EMERGENCY ESTUARY
Shipped by: Bus~~; f~aff, Other ·
coLLECToR1s>, U/1 t r //!'in 5 /,k·u)t.C
I . STATION LOCATION: Estimated BOD Range: 0-5/5·25/25-65/40-130 or 100 plus
~ □ EFFLUENT
D INFLUENT
For Lab Use UNL y
Lab Number:
Cf~/) ( fl I oc✓-~""' Date Received: , /.i ,/ · V Time: / _,./ _/
II vr, i I J ,,....--.,, Rec'd by: : , f 1, WI From: Bus;Couri.e/·Hand Del
\~ L?'·-.,:"
DATA ENTRY BY: J °J :) CK: !
DATE REPORTED:
Or
S_eed: Yes D No □ Chlorinated: Yes D No □ REMARKS:
I Statlnn # ,I._ !Date Begin (yy/mm/dd), I Time Begi~rate End l~d Depth OM DB DBM I Value Type Composite l Sample T)lpe, C/o o·o/ .3 I /Z :t)S. -:---~-A H L T s B C / G \ GNXX .,,.) \. )
1 BODS 310 mg/I Chloride 940 mg/I ✓, NH3 as N 610 \ ,ti mg/I Li·Uthium 1132 • 2 COD High 340 ~g/1 Chi a: Td 32217 ug/1 I TKN as N 625 7.'1 mg/I Mg·Magnesium 927 ,
3 COD Low 335 mg/I Chi a: Con 32209 ug/1 ,j' N02 plus N03 as N 630 ,,~-
' /' I mg/I Mn·Manganese 1055 ug/1
4 Coliform: MF Fecal 31616 /lO0ml Pheophytin a 32213 ug/1 P: Total as P 665 mg/) Na·Sodium 929 mg/I
5 Coliform: MF Total 31504 1100ml Color: True 80 Pt·Co P04 as P 70507 mg/I Arsenic:Total 1002 ug/1
6 Coliform: Tube Fecal 31615 1100ml Color:(pH ) 83 ADMI P: Dissolved as P 666 mg/I Se·Se!enium 1147 ug/1
7 Coliform: Fecal Strep 31673 /l00ml Co_lor: pH ~.6 82 ADMI Hg·Mercury 71900 ug/1
8 Residue: Total 500 mg/I Cyanide 720 mg/I Cd<:admium 1027 ug/1 Organochlorine Pesticides
9 Volatile 505 mg/I ' Fluoride 951 mg/I Cr-Chromium:Total 1034 ug/1 Organophosphorus Pesticides
.
10 Fixed 510 mg/I ✓ Formaldehyde 71880 )i\ mg/I Cu<:opper 1042 ug/1
1 1 Residue: Suspended 530 mg/I Grease and Oils 556 mg/I NI-Nickel 1067 u9/I Add Hert,icldes
12 Volatile 535 mg/I Hardness Total 900 mg/I Pb·Lead ·1051 . ug/1
13 Fixed ·540 mg/I Specific Cond. 95 uMhos/cm 2 Zn·Zinc 1092 ug/1 Base/ Neutral Extractable Organics
pH 403 .-units 14 MBAS 38260 mg/I Acid Extractable Organics
15 Acidity to pH 4.5 436 mg/I Phenols 32730 ug/1 Ag-Silver 1077 ug/1
16 Acidity to pH 8.3 435 mg/I Sulfate 945 mg/I Al-Aluminum 1105 ug/1 _Purgeable Organics (VOA bottle~
17 Alkalinity to pH 8.3 415 mg/I Sulfide 745 mg/I Be·Berylllum 1012 ug/1
18 Alkallnlty to pH 4.5 410 mg/I Ca-Calcium 916 mg/I
19 TOC 680 mg/I Co-Cobalt 1037 ug/1
20 Turbidity 76 NTU Fe-Iron 1045 ug/1 Phytoplankton
Sampling Point% Conductance at 25 C !water Temperature (C D.O. mg/I pH Alkalinity Acidity Air Temperature (C)
pH 8.3 .. pH 4,5 pH 4.5 pH 8.3
2 94 10 300 I • 400 ' . 82244 431 82243 182242 on ., .....-.i-"\
Salinity% Precipitlon On/day) Cloud Cover % Wind Direction (Deg) Stream Ao_W Severity Turbidity Severity Wind Velocity M/H r,t:eau Strea'in~d:t..fJ.. :St&am Wldth""ft. ,o , •'O [\ \ \G \!-=-':'-
480 45 32 36 1351 1350 35 64
DMl/Revised 10186
~ -~ .(~iV\~ION 01/fNVIR0NMENTAL MANAGEMENT WATO""9YA~ITY. FIELD-LAB FORM (DM 1) ~ For Lab Use ONLY
7'\ /, / -=c /t' Lab Number:(__/~ _./ z'., Y-
~.-~.-•~,:; __ ·'couNTY l .. -01.. t.,.-J)J q !) :; · r--;s PRIORITY · ;. , 1
RNER BASIN {__I ,P (.,. ✓----
REPORT TO: ARO FRO MRO RRO w aRO"WIRq!WsRo TS
AT BM · I___.,....
□AMBIENT
gy<>MPLIANCE
lir EMERGENCY
D;QA
15'.:1 CHAIN
OF CUSTODY
!Station # lo 1D~e Begl~yy/m~d~ I Time ~egl:,1 Date End ~ -,..'/,· I /2-2 -, ----~J • v' I • .--t/ I I
1 BODS 310 mg/I Chloride 940
2 COD High 340 mg/I Chi a: _Tri 32217
3 COD Low 335 mg/I Chi a: Corr 32209
4 Coliform: MF Fecal 31616 1100ml Pheophytln a 32213
5 Coliform: MF Total 31504 /lOOml Color: True 80
6 Coliform: Tube Fecal 31615 1100ml Color:(pH \ 83
7 Coliform: Fecal Strep 3J673 /lOOml Color: pH 7 .6 82
8 Residue: Total 500 mg/I Cyanide 720
9 Volatile 505 mg/I , Fluoride 951
10 Fixed 510 mg/I J Formaldehyde 71880 l"l ~·J i I!~·")
11 Residue: Suspended 530 mg/I Grease and Olis 556
12 Volatile 5 35 mg/I Hardness Total 900
SAMPLE TYPE
I ' ~ STREAM
□ LAKE
6J ESTUARY
□ EFFLUENT
□ INFLUENT
Oj) o ii O I ' ;1(7 ·:zt:.. Date Received: / _. l' () I Time: V ; __,, /
I ·')1-'\ ,/ r-___ Rec'd by:,-/ ff WI From: Bus;Courler4-tand Del
--\-~\. \<:
DATA ENTRY BY: \ 1r "I CK: .l )
DATE REPORTED:
:T~~d Depth OM DB DBM !Value Type Composite l Sample JYP) .
-A H L T s B C ( G ~ GNXX
mg/I ✓, NH3 as N 610 11 mg/I LI-Lithium 1132 ' ug/1 J TKN D.S N 625 /\, '.) mg/I Mg~agneslum 927
I
ug/1 , N02 plus N03 as N 630 . !\lj mg/] Mn-Manganese 1055 ug/1 " ug/J P: Total as P 665 mg/I Na-Sodium 929 mg/I
Pt-Co P04 as P 70507 mg/I Arsenlc:Total 1002 ug/1
ADMI P: Dissolved as P 666 mg/] Se-Selenium 1147 ug/1
AOMI Hg-Mercury 71900 ug/1
mg/I Cd<,D.dmlum 1027 ug/1 Organochlorlne Pesticides
mg/I CrChromlum:Total 1034 ug/J Organophosplorus Pesdddes
mg/I Cu<opper 1042 ug/1
mg/I NI-Nickel 1067 ug/1 Acid Herbicides \'
mg/I Pb-Lead 1051 ug/1 ''
13 Fixed 540 mg/I Specific Cond. 95 uMhos/cm 2 Zn-Zinc 1092 ug/] Base/ Neutral Extractabi~ OrSanlcs '
14 pH 403 units MBAS 38260 mg/I Acid Extractable OrganlCiil
15 Acidity to pH 4~5 436 mg/I Phenols 32730 ug/1 Ag-Silver 1077 ug/1
16 Acidity to pH 8.3 435 mg/I Sulfate 945 mg/] Al-Aluminum 1105 ug/1 Purgeable Organics (VOA bottle I
17 Alkalinity to pH 8.3 415 mg/I Sulfide 745 mg/I Be-BeryOium 1012 ug/1
18 Alkalinity to pH 4.5 410 mg/I Ca-Calcium 916 mg/I
19 TOC 680 mg/I Co-Cobalt 1037 ug/1
20 Turbidity 76 NTU Fe-Iron 1045 ug/] Phytoplankton
Sampling Point% Conductance at 25 C !Water Temperature IC D.O. mg/l pH Alkalinity Acidity J Afr Tempen,n,,e (C)
pH 8.3 pH 4.5 pH 4.5 pH 8.3 -r---,,, fF"":'."'11' .::-, ,-C , .. , •J t.::.~) ;,. ".,.... _.1, •• ~,
2 94 10 300 I • 400 ,. 82244 431 82243 82242 20
Sallnlty % Preclpltlon On/day) Cloud Cover % Wind Direcdon (Deg) Stream Flow Severity Turbidity Severity Wind Velocity M/H "1:ean Stream Depth fL "ub,,,,ld_th fi:J~d -\ 0 ~
--iicdon n.:...~.:;\on::l Oi!i1":-C
480 45 ' 32 36 1351 1350 35 64 -\/l/ih7'
DMl/Revt1ed 10/86
For Lab Use ONLY
·; __ D!_VJ§.ION OF ,ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT WATO",\QUALITY FIELD·LAB FORM (DM 1) ~ (_.,_-(I, . 'Y/'C .. COUNTY (.,t f,/Y)r, ./, PRIORITY -...
RIVER BASIN . (.'_~ F-t A
REPORT TO: ARO FRO MRO RRO WaRo'WiR(fWSRO TS
AT sM ·· ...____.
□AMBIENT 0 <?A
O'coMPLIANCE fJ CHAIN Other
.,,,:---<;) Shipped by: Blrs Courier, Staff, Other __ _,_) _____ _
COLLECTOR(~~...__c.,Ztl; /////--;,;» s-I ,.f If-µ} ( <_;
rfi OF CUSTODY
t!..J EMERGENCY
' I
Estimated BOD Range: 0-5/5-25/25-65/40-130 or 100 plus STATION LOCATION:
Seed: ,Yes 0 No □ Chlorinated: Yes 0 No □ ·REMARKS:
I Station # '7 lt;r Begin_ ('yy/mm/dd) I Tlm.e Begin l Date End /) C, 7 7. , I , . ,.-, ,! r )i I• l-·l/ ,..... . ,
1 BODS 310 mg/I Chloride 940
2 COD High 340 mg/I Chi a: Tri 32217
'
3 COD Low 335 mg/I Chi a: Corr 32209
4 Coliform: MF Fecal 31616 /l00ml Pheophytln a 32213
5 Coliform: MF Total 31504 1100ml Color: True 80
6 Coliform: Tube Fecal 31615 1100ml Color:(pH I 83
7 -Coliform: Fecal Strep 31673 /l00ml Color: pH 7 .6 82
8 Residue: Total 500 mg/I Cyanide 720 .
9 Volatile 505 mg/I I Fluoride 951
10 Fixed 510 mg/I I✓ Formaldehyde 71880 L!' ,,,·, _,,
11 Residue: Suspended 530 mg/I Grease and Oils 556
12 Volatile 535 mg/I Hardness Total 900
SAMPLE TYPE
1
-E'.J STREAM
□ LAKE
□ESTUARY
□ EFFLUENT
□ INFLUENT
I~ EndJ Depth OM DB DBM !Value Type
A H
mg/I ✓/ NH3 zu; N 610 71
ug/1 ✓i TKN as N 625 1'-.:'\ -'l,
ug/1 ✓ NO2 plus NO3 as N 630 -,j '·; ·,
ug/1 P: Total as P 665
Pt-Co P04 as P 70507
ADMI P: Dissolved as P 666
ADM!
mg/I Cd-cadmium 1027
mg/I Cr-Chromlum:Total 1034
mg/I Cu~pper 1042
mg/I NI-Nickel 106 7
mg/I Pb-Lead 1051
2
Date Received:,._:::://)/) _,..'.2 7J J Time:/) ::,:; :?c: I I ..,, ..., V I / _.,,,._=.;.
Rec'd by:, . .J nu ,.J I From: BurC~zHand Del
I I { J ' t ' '· c;:_:::::.;; .~
DATA ENTRY BY: L) J CK: l ✓;··
DATE REPORTED:
' Composite I ~am~:~~=;J L T s B GNXX
mg/I Li-Lithium 1132 • mg/I Mg-Magnesium 927
mg/I Mn-Manganese 1055 ug/1
mg/I Na-Sodium 929 mg/I
mg/I Arsenic:Total 1002 ug/1
mg/I Se-Selenium 1147 ug/1
Hg-Mercury 71900 ug/1
ug/1 Organochlorlne Pesticides
ug/1 Organophos{Xx)rus Pestickles
ug/1
ug/1 Acid Herbicides
ug/1
13 Fixed 540 mg/I Specific Cond. 95 uMhos/cm Zn-Zinc 1092 ug/1 Base/ Neutral Extractable Organics
14 pH 403 units MBAS 38260 mg/I Acid Extractable Organics
15 Acidity to pH 4.5 436 mg/I Phenols 32730 ug/1 Ag-Sliver 1077 ug/1 .
16 Acidity to pH 8.3 435 mg/I Sulfate 945 mg/I Al-Aluminum 1105 ug/1 Purgeable Organics (VOA bottle re
17 Alkalinity to pH 8.~ 415 mg/I Sulfide 745 mg/I Be-Beryllium 1012 ug/1
18 Alkalinity to pH 4.5 410 mg/I Ca-Calcium 916 mg/I
19 TOC 680 mg/I Co-Cobalt 1037 ug/1
20 Turbidity 76 NTU Fe-Iron 1045 ug/1 Phyt0plankton
.
SalTlpling Point~ Conductance at 25 C Water Temperature fC D.O. mg/] pH Alkalinity Acidity Air Temperature IC)
pH 8.3 pH 4.5 pH 4.5 pH 8.3
2 94 10 300 I • 400 ,. 82244 431 82243 82242 ..-..... ,--
Salinity ~ Preclpltlon On/day) Cloud Cover !it Wind Direction (Deg) Stream Flow Severity Turbidity Severity Wind Velocity M/H r,,:@ .. I\.Si'r~am ~Pth~ Stieain Width ft.
?u -~o
36 1350 ' 64 f\Uf:l _, n,}
480 45 32 1351 35 -.
DMl/Revised 10/86
t_.DIYl§!ON OF )i/NVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT WAT.o"f!UALITY
/. ·, 'C coUNTY r l.11. !,-/Y)A/j ✓ PR10Rnv .. ·
FIELD-LAff·FORM (DM I)
SAMPLE TYPE @
RNER BASIN r7 r/.
REPORT TO: ARO FRO MRO RRO WaRO,.-WiRo'WSRO TS
AT BM '----~'"
Other ,,,..,.,.......,_D
Shipped by: Bu{ Courlef, Staff, Other---"-----,;_-
COLLECTOR(5{;---··-?{f I I I Irr;, s
. I
Estimated BOD Rzinge: 0-5/5-25/25-65/40-130 or-100 plus
Seed:
□AMBIENT
Q·coMPLIANCE
[) EMERGENCY
STATION LOCATION:
OF CUSTODY I □ STREAM
□·LAKE
□ESTUARY
□ EFFLUENT
□ INFLUENT
-~,
V, Tl' l'i ~-,, -·--.
For Lab Use ONLY
Lab Number: /'7U/
/j ~-, R I /')/.· <~ Date Received:-;, I/ t/ , ·;'t} Time: / / 3/ _,/ _
l/n~1,1 1
1
. -----Rec'd bv:-/J/11l1_/ From: Bus-Coude~Hand Del
DATA ENTRY BY: CK:
DATE REPORTED:
I Station #8 l°a~e Begin (yy/mm/dd) I Time Begl1;1 I Date End I T-~~:._:~_d Depth OM DB DBM I Value Type Composite 1Sample_.Ty0 {,1,1,, /1'7 3' /, .. ,-A H L T s B Cl' G GNXX
," ,_.,., 'I~,' / I / ~ /, .:). I I I ' /
1 BODS 310 mg/I Chloride 940 mg/I ✓1 NH3 as N 610 IL,J~ mg/I LI-Lithium 1132 • 2 COD High 340 mg/I Chi a: Tri 32217 ug/1 ,;; TKN as N 625 \ -I'') mg/I Mg-Magnesium 927
3 COD Low 335 mg/I Chi a: Corr 32209 ug/1 I N02 plus N03 as N 630 -mg/I Mn-Manganese 1055 ug/1 ,,; -" . -~
4 Coliform: MF Fecal 31616 1100ml Pheophytln a 32213 ug/1 P: Total as P 665 mg/I Na-Sodium 929 mg/I
5 Coliform: MF Total 31504 1100ml Color: True 80 Pt-Co P04 as P 70507 mg/I Arsenic:Total 1002 ug/1
6 Coliform: Tube Fecal 31615 1100ml Color:(pH } 83 ADMI P: Dissolved as P 666 mg/I Se-Selenium 1147 ug(I
7 Collf?rm'. Fe(:~I Strep 31673 1100ml Color: pH 7.6 82 ADMI Hg-Mercury 71900 ug/1
8 Residue: Total 500 mg/I Cyanide 720 mg/I Cd-Cadmium 1027 ug/1 Organochlorlne Pesticides
9 Volatile 505 mg/I j Fluoride 951 mg/I Cr-Chromlum:Total 1034 ug/1 Organophos(Xxin.1s Pesticides
10 Fixed 510 mg/I ✓ Formaldehyde 71880 >"L) mg/I Cu-Copper 1042 ug/1
11 Residue: Suspended 530 mg/I Grease and Oils 556 mg/I Ni-Nickel 1067 ug/1 Acid Herbicides
12 Volatile 535 mg/I Hardness Total 900 mg/I Pb-Lead 1051 ug/1
13 Fixed 540 mg/I Specific Cond. 95 uMhos/cm 2 Zn-Zinc I 092 ug/1 Base/ Neutral Extractable Organics
14 pH 403 units MBAS 38260 mg/I Acid Extractable Organics
15 Acidity to pH 4.5 436 mg/I Phenols 32730 ug/1 Ag-Silver 1077 ug/1
16 Acidity to pH 8.3 435 mg/I Sulfate 945 mg/I AI-Aluminum 1105 ug/1 Purgeable Organics (VOA bottl~.
17 Alkalinity to pH 8.3 415 mg/I Sulfide 745 mg/I Be-Beryllium 1012 ug/1
18 Alkalinity to pH 4.5 410 mg/I Ca-Calcium 916 mg/I
19 TOC 680 mg/I Co-Cobalt 1037 ug/1
20 Turbidity 76 NTU Fe-Iron 1045 ug/1 Phytoplankton
Sampling Point~ Conductance at 25 C Water Temperature IC) D.O .. mg/1 pH Alkalinity Acidity Air Tempemture (C)
pH 8.3 pH 4.5 pH 4.5 pH 8.3
2 94 10 300 I • 400 I • 82244 431 82243 82242 ~---~ ~o
Preclpltlon On/day) Stream Flow Severity Wind Velocity MIHa· ~~_a_p(?.~e'iun"tri.ipth~t
-a
Salinity 51; Cloud Cover % Wind Direction (Deg) Turbidity Severity Stream WMth ft.
?l) ,. .... ,,..,,
-.AUG i:'.:..O~
480 45 32 36 1351 1350 35 -' 4
DMl/Revlsed 10/86
I., D(.IJISION OF )tVIRONMENTAL. MANAGEMENT WATO·UALITY t,,._,, ,:11r
COUNTY r _f"J/_ L· /Y) / 1 /.1 --;,,• PRIORITY · ~-·
FIEl:D·LAB FORM (DMl) · ~ .. :· '
SAMPLE TYPE / ~
For Lab Use ONLY
r:,v 1 -1/,-,,-· __,
Date Received: / /) [) ,(}_/j Time: U Z/ --=;' '7
RNER BASIN /I --; • r--·L
REPORT TO: ARO FRO MRO RHO WaR~>'wiRO 'jijSRO TS
AT BM . , __ __,/
Other -------""',
Shipped by: Bus"courle), Staff, Other--~------
COLLECTOR(,;),'-7j:); I I, 11/Y,,; / J! /i-t.<.lt S
'· I
Estimated BOD Range: 0·5/5·25/25-65/40-130 or 100 plus
Seed: Yes D No0 Chlorinated: Yes D No □
□AMBIENT
OeoMPLIANCE d EMERGENCY
□lA Q CHAIN
OF CUSTODY
STATION LOCATION:
REMARKS:
I Station #q IDa..te Begin (yy/mm/dd' I Time B ... esin I Date End .
{.,/, --.., I i • ' ---, i!7 . f.J I , ') -I -::J,t',? . ' .
1 BODS 310 mg/I Chloride 940
2 COD High 340 mg/I Chi a: Tri 32217
-
3 COD Low 335 mg/I Chi a: Corr 32209
4 Coliform: MF Fecal 31616 1100ml Pheophytln a 32213
5 Coliform: MF Total 31504 1100ml Color: True 80
6 Coliform: Tube Fecal 31615 1100ml Color:(pH ) 83
7 Coliform: Fecal Strep 31673 /lOOml Color: pH 7.6 82
8 Residue: Total 500 mg/I Cyanide 720
9 Volatile 505 mg/I I Fluorkle 951
10 Fixed 510 mg/I I Formaldehyde 71880 7t\
Residue: Suspended 530 mg/I • Grease and Oils 556 11
12 Volatile 535 mg/I Hardness Total 900
I □ STREAM [;:Z]
0
' EFFLUENT
□ LAKE INFLUENT
□ESTUARY
/I -' • ._;
Rec'd b : ('/ /11M, From: Bus-.C~Hand Del
DATA ENTRY BY:
-.--(.
CK: \
DATE REPORTED:
r~e Endl,Depth OM DB DBM I Value Type Composite !Sample 1)0 A H L T s B C( G · GNXX ---
mg/I J: NH3 as N 610 q j(\ mg/I Li-Lithium 1132 Jt2 ug/1 ./1 TKN as N 625 -,:,, mg/I M!H-1agneslum 927
' ug/1 ·; N02 plus N03 as N 630-i. ; mg/I Mn-Manganese 1055 ug/1
ug/1 . P: Total as P 665 mg/I Na·Sodlum 929 mg/I
Pt·Co P04 as P 70507 mg/I . Arsenic:Total 1002 ug/1
ADMI P: Dissolved as P 666 mg/I Se-Selenium 1147 ug/1
ADMI Hg-Mercury 71900 ug/1
mg/I Cd<:admlum 1027 ug/1 Organochlorine Pesticides
mg/I Cr-Chromlum:Total 1034 ug/1 Organophosphorus Pesticides
mg/I Cu-Copper 1042 ug/1
mg/I NI-Nickel 1067 ug/1 Acid Herbicides
mg/I Pb·Lead 1051 ug/1
13 Fixed 540 mg/I Specific Cond. 95 uMhos/cm 2 Zn·Zinc 1092 ug/1 Base/ Neutral Extractable Organics
14 pH 403 units MBAS 38260 mg/I Acid Extractable Organics
15 Acidity to pH 4.5 436 mg/I Phenols 32730 ug/1 Ag-Stiver 1077 ug/1
16 Acidity to pH 8.3 435 mg/I Sulfate 945 mg/I Al·Aluminum 1105 ug/1 Purgeable Organics (VOA bottl~.
17 Alkalinity to pH 8.3 415 mg/I Sulfide 745 mg/I Be·BeryIJlum 1012 ug/1
18 Alkalinity to pH 4.5 410 mg/I Ca-Calcium 916 mg/I
19 TOC 680 mg/I Co-Cobalt 1037 ug/1
20 Turbidity 76 NTU Fe-Iron 1045 ug/1 Phytoplankton
Sampling Point% Conductance at 25 C !water Temperature (C D.0. mg/] pH Alkalinity Acidity Air Tempera~re (C)
pH 8.3 pH 4.5 pH 4.5 pH 8.3
2 94 10 300 I • 400 '. 82244 431 82243 •8224»r-"rcn, ·-· r"' 20 .
Salinity % Preclpltion On/day) Cloud Cover % Wind Direction (Deg) Stream Flow Severity Tu'rbldity Severity Wind Velocity M/H Mea;, St~ea~ Depth ft.. Stream Width fL
,.
AUG 2u ,X'i) V•~• -480 45 32 36 1351 1350 35 64 4 ... , r) --•• ,.,,r qr,,; n -.,11.r. ..
DMl/Revlsed 10/86
• •
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
30 AUGUST l 990
MEMORANDUM
TO: Ken Eagleson
THROUGH: Jimmie Overto~
Trish MacPher~
FROM: Larry Eaton :t' [_
SUBJECT: Wright Chemical spill assessment on Livingston Creek,
Columbus Co. 16 August 1990.
BACKGROUND
Livingston Creek is a small, tidal tributary of the Cape Fear River
rn Columbus County. There are five permitted dischargers on this
creek (Table 1 ). Wright Chemical, the largest discharger in the
watershed, 1s permitted to discharge backwash and cooling water.
Table 1 Dischargers to Livingston Creek
Discharger
Acme Delco Elementary
Acme Delco High
Kaiser Aluminum & Chem.
Wright Chemical Corp.
NPDES # Permitted
NC0043796
NC0043788
Dischar·ge (l'vlGD)
0.009
0.01
· 3-7:.RA--2,~~it' --c-1-kJ lorlC,H?. 01SC/JRiG1,/,
NC000 I 066 Not Discharging.__: 5,;,.,1, fuw,t/ ,,,; 19gq
NC0003395 0.115 . F-Rcn,n-; sHur [Jowl-1
Sampling in February of Wright Chemical and Livingston Creek by
the Wilmington Regional Office· with help from Raleigh's Ecosystems
Analysis Unit, found 19 violations of stream water quality in the
creek that were determined to be from Wright Chemical.
\Enforcement actions arc pending. On July 30, 1990, 381 gallons of / /
Jo{ .,efJ•formaldehyde were s illed into the creek, Six hundred gallons of .,..,.,-1,._0 ·
~~pl;, -11mmonium hydroxide being used to treat the s )ill also escaped into
i~1 the creek. Water samples collected in Livingston Creek following this ---------s pi I I showed high levels of formaldehyde, but a bioassay of the creek
showed no acute toxicity. In response to a request from the
\Vilmington Regional Office, a benthic macroinvertebrate survey of
Living~on Creek was performed on August 16, 1990 to determine
any impacts to the str·eam fauna from this formaldehyde spill.
FIGURE 1 Map of Livingston Creek
STUDY Wright Chemical Corp.
COUNTY: Columbus
BASIN: Cape Fear
RIEGELWOOD
Pretty Cr.
Livingston Cr.
us 74/76
DELCO
SR-1878
•
Cape Fear R.
Livingston Cr.
Wright
Chem.
• •
STATION LOCATIONS
Two sites were sampled on Livingston Creek (Figure l ). Station l
was located approximately 1 mile upstream of the Wright Chemical
outfall. Station 2 was located just below the ernbayment into which
Wright Chemical discharges and the spill occurred.
METHODS
Livingston Creek is a steep-banked, tidal creek whose physical
characteristics made a routine. qualitative sampling difficult and
potentially unreliable. Instead, quantitative sampling was employed.
A petite ponar was used to collect 3 replicate samples at each site
with 2 ponar drops in each replicate. Samples were first elutriated
through a 200 microri mesh net to collect small insects and worms.
The sample remaining after elutriation was washed through a 600
micron mesh sieve to remove mud and sand to facilitate picking. All
. benthic macroinvertebrates were separated (picked) from the
sediment and detritus of each sample in the field and were
preserved in alcohol.
Several indices were calculated to enhance data analysis. These
indices were a Biotic Index (BI), Common Taxa Index (CTI), Common
Dominants Index (CDI) and Shannon-Weiner Diversity Index (H').
The Biotic Index is a measure of a group of organisms' pollution
tolerance, while both the Common Taxa Jndex and Common
Dominants Index measure the similarity of species above and below
a site. The Diversity Index measures not only the number of species
at a site, but also the evenness of the distribution of individuals
among those species.
RESULTS AND DlSCUSSfON
Wright Chemical appears to be having a deleterious effect on
Livingston Creek. Upstream of the plant, the stream is typical of
coastal swamp streams; slow-flowing and tannic, with a bottom of
sand and detritus. Downstream, however, the sand bottom is
cluttered with an unusual gravel and clay substrate (Table 2).
In addition to physical changes in the substrate, taxa richness
dropped from 39 to 24 (38%), the number of pollution intolernnt EPT
taxa dropped from 4 upstream to O downstream and species
diversj.ty (I-I') was reduced 29% 'from 4.17 to 2.96 (Table 3). This
reduction indicates a shift from a relatively even distribution of
• •
Table 2. Station Descriptions on Livingston Creek, 16 August 1990.
STATION# _1_ ___L_
LOCATION Ill I' ab Wright be Wrioht b
WIDTH (rn) 8 l 5
DEPTH (m) l. 0 l. 2
CURRENT (f/s) 0.5 1.0
CONDUCTIVITY (urnhos/crn) , l 5 2 193
CANOPY(%) 90 50
AUFWUCf-IS None None
SUBSTRATE(%)
BOULDER 0 0
RUBBLE 0 0
GRAVEL 0 30
SAND 90 70
SILT l 0 Tr
COMMT':\NTS Swamp Gravel was
Stream reel clay
Table 3. Benthic Macroinvertebrate Taxa Richness, Livingston Creek.
16 August 1990.
Station Number I 2
EPHEMEROJYfERA 1 0
PLECOJYrERA 0 0
TRICHO!YfERA 3 0
COLEOIYJ'ERA 3 2
ODONATA 3 0
MEGALOJYfERA ' l 0
DIPTERA: MJSC l 1
DIJYfERA: CI-JIRON. l l l 0
OLIGOCHAET A 6 4
MOLLUSCA 2 4
O'TT-IER 5 2
EPTTAXA 4 0
TOTALTAXA 3 9 24
DENSITY (#/M2) 5365 8451
SHANNON-WEINER
DIVERSITY INDEX 4.17 2.96
BIOTIC INDEX :3. 1 I 3 .43
/
• •
diversity (H') was reduced 29% from 4.17 to 2.96 (Table 3). This·
reduction indicates a shift from a relatively even distribution of
abundance, indicative of a healthy community, to a very skewed
distribution indicative of a stressed situation. Over 60% of all
individuals at the site downstream were either Limnoclrilus sp. or
Pristina sp., tolerant oligochaete species (Appendix 1).
The common dominants index showed a moderate (25%) impact
while the common taxa index detected this shift as well (.38), also
indicating a moderate impact. The drop in the biotic index from 3 .11
to 3.43 reflects this shift to more pollution tolerant-organisms.
SUMMARY
It appears that Wright Chemical Corporation is having a
noticeable impact on the fauna· of Livingston Creek. The stream
fauna changed from a typical swamp stream dominated by
amphipods, midges and beetles upstream of the plant, to a much
more stressed ecosystem dominated by pollution tolerant
oligochaetes downstream.
CC Mike Williams -WiRO
Central Files
All work in this study was done rn sub-basin 03-06-17.
RECEIVED
SE p 1 n '1J"u·· -.., ,.,:::P
APPENDIX l •• NTH!C MACROINVERTEBRATE .A RICHNESS.
LIVINGSTON CREEK. AUGUST 1990
EPHEMEROPTERA
HEXAGENIA SPP
TRICHOPTERA
MOLANNA UNIOPHILA
PYCNOPSYCHE SPP
TRIAENODES TARDUS
COLEOPTERA
DUBIRAPHIA SPP
MACRONYCHUS GLABRATUS
STENELMIS SPP
ODONATA
ARGIA SPP
ENALLAGMA SPP
MACROMIA GEORGIANA
MEGALOPTERA
SIALIS SPP
OIPTERA:CHIRON
ABLABESMYIA MALLOCHI
CHIRONOMUS SPP
CRYPTOTENDIPES SPP
OICROTENOIPES NERVOSUS
LABRUNOINIA SPP
MICROTENOIPES SPl
NANOCLADIUS SPP
PAGASTIELLA □STANSA
PARALAUTERBORNIELLA NIGROHALTERALIS
POLYPEOILUM HALTERALE
POLYPEDILUM ILLINOENSE
POLYPEOILUM SCALAENUM
PROCLAOIUS SPP
STENOCHIRONOMUS SPP
TANYTARSUS SPZ
TRIBELOS SPP
DIPTERA:MISC.
PALPOMYIA !COMPLEX)
OLIGOCHAETA
LIMNODRILUS SPP
LUMBRICULIDAE
NAIS SPP
PRISTINA LEIDY!
SPIROSPERMA NIKOLSKYI
TUBIFEX TUBIFEX
I'
CRUSTACEA
ASELLUS SPP
CRANGONYX SPP
0 l 02
2
l
1
1
9
1
. 13
1
1
6
2
5
•
l
6
1
10
•
2
1
6
•
• 28
3
3
•
3
5
1
2
1
1
4
2
l
•
•
•
•
5
•
l
•
•
•
•
3
6
•
29
•
7
1
•
2
4
1
l
•
•
•
1
2
108
•
•
81
14
7
•
•
1
APPENDIX l •• ENTHIC MACROINVERTEBRATEAXA RICHNESS. ~ VINGSTDN CREEK. AUGUST ~O
0 l 02
GAMMARUS 49 16
MOLLUSCA
AMNICOLA SPP 8 • CORBICULA FLUMINEA 3 z
LAEVAPEX FUSCUS • z
MENETUS DILATUS • 3
PHYSELLA SPP • l
OTHER
ALBDGLOSSIPHONfA HETERDCLITA l • BACTRACOBDELLA PHALERA 1 • DUGESIA TIGRINA 5 6
HELOBOELLA ELONGATA 3 • LEPIOOPTERA • l
PLACOBDELLA PAPILLIFERA 1 •
z
•
December 19, 1984
October 23, 1985
February 15, 1986
February 14, 1986
March 17, 1986
March 25, 1986
May 21, 1987
June 17, 1987
July 15, 1987
October 22, 1987
October 20, 1987
December 22, 1987
/
WRIGHT CORPORATION
ENFORCEMENT HISTORY
•
Notice of Noncompliance
TSS Violation limit 30mg/L
violation 114 mg/L
Notice of Noncompliance
Failure to submit monitoring data
Notice of Noncompliance-December 1985
Failure to record correct NPDES No.
Failure to record correct discharge No
on DMR
Notice of Noncompliance-January 1986
Failure to Record correct NPDES No.
on DMR
Notice of Noncompliance
Failure to submit original and one
copy of DMR
Notice of Noncompliance
Failure to record NPDES No. on DMR
Incorrect self-monitoring report flow
not indicated in MGD
Notice of Noncompliance
Failure to submit monthly monitoring
Notice of Violation
Failure to receive monthly monitoring
Notice of Noncompliance
Constructing outlets to surface waters
(4 inch pvc pipe, discharging boiler
blowdown) and (24 inch bypass from
equalization pond) In Violation of
NCGS 143-215.l(a)(l)
Notice of Noncompliance
Discharge of process waste into Mill
Creek (8000 gals.) *Spill reported to
DEM 16 days after occurrence -"fish
kill reported" Violation of Permit
2361-R
Notice of Noncompliance
Making outlets to surface waters in
Violation of NCGS 143-215.1 (a){l)
•
December 31, 1987
January 21, 1988
February 11, 1988
March 16, 1988
October 18, 1988
November 9, 1988
January 5, 1989
March 2, 1989
April 24, 1989
May 9, 1989
May 12, 1989
May 12, 1989
May 22, 1989
WRIGHT CORPORATION.
ENFORCEMENT HISTORY
•
Correspondence from Wright Chemical
stating that improper discharges
eliminated.
Spill, Discharge
Wright informed state that a three
inch pvc pipe burst and discharged to
Mill Creek
Spill -1500 pounds 100 gallons of 93%
Sulfuric Acid spilled
Verbal Telephonic Notification
,Re: Late DMR reports
Notice of Noncompliance
Toxicity Testing
1000-1500 Gallon waste Water spill
November 7, 1988
Notice of Violation
Violation of "2L" Groundwater
s.tandards
3,000-2500 Pounds of Sodium Hydroxide
spilled February 12, 1989
Notice of Violation
Failure to notify of wastewater
discharge
Notification requirements and phone
numbers provided to Wright
Notice of Violation
O~erating a disposal system without a
valid permit. Permit 2361-R2 expired
Notice of Violation
Operating a disposal system without a
valid permit. Permit 2362-R2 expired
Enforcement Report
Operating a disposal system without
valid permit
•
October 19, 1989
December 1, 1989
December 6, 1989
January 12, 1990
January 29, 1990
February 2, 1990
February 13, 1990
July 16, 1990
July 30, 1990
August 1, 1990
August 13, 1990
WRIGHT CORPORATION
ENFORCEMENT HISTORY
•
Wright Corporation assessed $2,213.00
for 2 counts of operating a disposal
system without valid permits
5000 gallon wastewater discharge as a
result of a fire occurring 11/25/89
2270 gallons of 93% Sulfuric Acid
spilled on rail yard area
Notice of Violation
Failure to submit original and 1 copy
of November 1989 DMR
Notice of Violation
Illegal discharges from plant site
'
Notice of Violation
19 Violations of "2L" Groundwater
standards violations
Extensive sampling investigation of
site and Livingston Creek
Enforcement action completed for
violations of 143-215.l(a)(l) as a
result of 2/13/90 investigation
381 Gallon Formaldehyde spill
notification not made until 7/31/90
Company discharges approximately 600
gallons of Ammonium Hydroxide on areas
affected by Formaldehyde without
approval or notice
Notice of Violation
NCGS 143-215.85 & 143-215.83 for
7/30/90 through 8/1/90
• •
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
MEMORANDUM
DATE: January 10, 1991
TO: Steve Tedder, Chief
Water Quality section
FROM: A. Preston Howard, Jr., Regional Supervisor
Wilmington Regional Office
THROUGH: Harlan K. Britt, Deputy Director
Division of Environmental Management
SUBJECT: Enforcement Report and Recommendations
Wright Corporation-Formaldehyde Spill
Columbus County
Please find attached the subject enforcement report prepared
by Mr. Michael Williams of the Wilmington Regional Office. The
report concludes that the Wright Corporation violated NCGS
143-215.83(a), and NCGS 143-215.85, by discharging formaldehyde,
a hazardous substance, into waters, and upon lands of the State.
Subsequently, the Wright Corporation violated NCGS 143-215.85, by
failing to immediately notify the Department of the spill. In
addition, the Wright Corporation intentionally discharged
ammonium hydroxide onto the ground by applying the solution to
treat the areas affected by the formaldehyde spill.
The Wilmington Regional Office is requesting that
appropriate civil penalties be assessed against the Wright
Corporation in accordance with NCGS 143-215.9l(a).
If you have any questions concerning the attached report,
please advise.
MW:WRIGHT3.DOC
Attachments
cc: WiRO
•
ENFORCEMENT REPORT
WRIGHT CORPORATION
COLUMBUS COUNTY
•
The Wright Corporation operates a chemical manufacturing
facility which produces sulfuric acid, formaldehyde and hexamine.
The facility is located in Acme, North Carolina, with the mailing
address being Post Office Box 402, Riegelwood, North Carolina
28456.
On July 31, 1990, at 0937 hours; Mr. Dave Adkins, Regional
Water Quality Supervisor of the Wilmington Regional Office was
notified by Mr. Dann Dettman, Governmental Affairs Officer for
the Wright Corporation, that approximately 651 pounds of
formaldehyde was spilled at the truck loading area at
approximately 1822 hours on July 30, 1990 (40 CFR Part 117
indicates the reportable quantity of formaldehyde is 100 pounds).
Mr. Dettman indicated to Mr. Adkins that approximately 25% of the
material reached the creek. The spill investigation was assigned
to Mr. Mike Williams of the Wilmington Regional Office. Mr.
Williams contacted Mr. Dettman by telephone at approximately 0950
hours on July 31, 1990, and inquired as to the reason the spill
was reported immediately rather than 15 hours after the spill
occurred. Mr. Dettman replied that it took that long to calculate
how much was lost, and they did not know who to call. Mr. Dettman
stated that he was aware of the spill at approximately 1900
hours, 38 minutes after the spill. Mr. Williams asked if any
samples had been collected. Mr. Dettman's reply was in the
negative. Mr. Dettman was asked if any fish or aquatic life had
been affected. Mr. Dettman indicated he did not know. Mr. Dettman
was asked if the company had had anyone investigate the possible
impact of the spill on Livingston Creek via boat. He replied that
the company had not sent anyone out, that the corporation had a
boat but no motor.
At approximately 1100 hours on July 31, 1990, Mr. Paul Rawls
and Mr. Mike Williams of the Wilmington Regional Office entered
Livingston Creek by boat at the bridge over NCSR 1878. Water
quality samples for formaldehyde and nutrients were collected
beginning at a point approximately 0.5 miles downstream of the
facility (Station 1). No dead fish were noticed in Livingston
Creek (no fish of any kind were noticed downstream of the
facility except for a few Gar). Stations 2,3, and 4 were located
adjacent to Wright Corporation on Livingston Creek. Stations 5,
and 6 were located upstream of the plant. The samples were later
shipped to DEM's Cary Laboratory and chain-of-custody procedures
were maintained. At approximately 1300 hours, Mr. Rawls and Mr.
Williams entered the plant site and met with Mr. Dettman. It was
discovered that the spilled product was a formaldehyde solution
(37% formaldehyde, 62% water, and 1% methanol). A map showing the
sampling locations is included as Attachment C.
• •
Mr. Dettman indicated the spill occurred as a result of an
employee overfilling a 5,000+ gallon tanker. The employee was
believed to have left the loading area during the filling of the
tanker. The truck loading area where the spill occurred was
inspected. Mr. Dettman indicated that a portion of the
formaldehyde entered the storm sewer leading toward the lined
pond (waste treatment area)·the remaining material flowed into a
graveled area, down an asphalt road onto a gravel road and into
graveled depression. A undetermined amount of the product entered
an under drain leading to a ditch which discharged into Livingston
creek.
Wright personnel had begun excavating the contaminated soils
and gravel. The material was being placed onto the ground
adjacent to the aeration pond on the plant site. Mr. Dettman was
informed that the material may need to be removed from the plant
site and disposed of properly in an approved hazardous waste
landfill. It was recommended the Corporation notify the Hazardous
Waste Branch. He indicated the intention of the Corporation to
bulldoze the contaminated soils into one of the ponds on the
plant site, as the pond needed to be filled in anyway. Mr.
Williams informed Mr. Dettman that the material must be collected
and disposed of in a proper manner. Simply bulldozing the
material into a pond was not satisfactory. Photographs of the
affected areas were taken and are attached to this report as
Attachment A.
An on site Notice of Violation was issued to Mr. Dettman for
the discharge and for failing to immediately notify the
Department of the spill. A copy of the Notice is attached to this
report as Attachment B. Mr. Williams and Mr. Rawls left the plant
site at approximately 1430 hours on July 31, 1990.
On August 1, 1990, Mr. Kirk McDonald, of the Groundwater
Section, Wilmington Regional Office visited the site to assess
possible groundwater impacts. Mr. McDonald instructed the Company
to place the contaminated materials on plastic, place hay bails
around the material and cover the soils with plastic, until the
contaminants were excavated and final disposal could be arranged.
A copy of Mr. McDonald's report is included as Attachment D.
On August 6, 1990, Mr. Williams and Mr. Rawls returned to
Wright Corporation to assess the clean-up activities in the area
of the spillage. The gravel area adjacent to the truck loading
terminal was believed to still contain formaldehyde as a boring
in the center of the area indicated the presence of formaldehyde.
Only a few inches of gravel had been removed from this area. Mr.
Dettman indicated that this was as deep as the company could
excavate as buried cable and pipes were beneath the area. It was
then learned that the company had sprayed approximately 600
gallons of 3% ammonium hydro,xide ( also a hazardous substance with
a reportable quantity of 1000 pounds) on the affected areas to
"neutralize" the formaldehyde.
• •
Mr. Dave Swart, Plant Engineer for Wright Corporation, and
Mr. Dettman were asked who authorized the application of ammonium
hydroxide. Mr. Swart replied that the persons who initially
investigated the spill were aware of the application. Mr.
Williams informed Mr. Swart that the three investigators from the
Department did not authorize the ammonium hydroxide application.
Mr. Dettman then concurred that no such authorization had been
communicated to him. Both Wright Officials were informed that by
applying the ammonia solution to the affected areas, that the
company may have violated laws pertaining to hazardous waste, and
again advised them that the Hazardous Waste Branch should be
notified. Mr. Dettman indicated that the Hazardous Waste Branch
had not yet been notified as efforts to contact Mr. Flint
Worrell had been fruitless. During the afternoon of August 6,
1990, Mr. Rawls attempted to contact Mr. Flint Worrell. Mr.
Williams contacted the Raleigh Office in an attempt to reach Mr.
Doug Holyfield. A message was left with the Raleigh Office
concerning the spill and clean-up.
On August 7, 1990, laboratory results were obtained via
phone conversation with Mr. Ray Kelling, Chemist in the Cary
Laboratory. Sample were collected from the following locations:
Station
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Location
1/2 mile Downstream on Livingston Creek*
Mill Creek at Livingston Creek*
Livingston Creek at the Wright Corporation*
Livingston Creek at the Wright Corporation*
1/2 mile Upstream on Livingston Creek*
1 mile Upstream on Livingston Creek*
ditch discharging to Livingston Creek
ditch discharging to Livingston Creek
seepage to ditch
*Note-Livingston Creek is a tidal creek.
Laboratory analysis of the samples produced the following
results:
(all results are in mg/1)
Station Formaldehyde NH 1 TKN NOf+NO3 1 9 6. 8.7 . 2
2 13 12 15 1. 2
3 6 5.6 7.0 1. 4
4 16 29 29 3.6
5 14 1. 4 2.4 0.79
6 0.3 0.19 0.5 0.44
7 400 79 130 3.8
8 210 160 190 3.5
9 20 910 5300 1. 1
Laboratory sheets showing results tabulated above are included as
Attachment E.
• •
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
ENFORCEMENT CASE ASSESSMENT FACTORS
Violator: Wright Corporation
Regional Office: Wilmington
1.
2 •
Degree and extent of harm and risk of harm caused by the
violation(s):
As a result of the spill, formaldehyde analyses were
performed at various locations along Livingston Creek. The
results indicate that a range of 0.3 mg/1 to 16 mg/1 of
formaldehyde was found within a 1 1/2 mile area of stream.
No fish, living or dead were observed near the plant site.
Only a few Gar (which appeared stressed) were noticed
downstream. Acute LCS0 values of formaldehyde for Cladocera
are 2.0 mg/1 to 5.0 mg/1, and the values for Striped Bass
are 3.7 mg/1 to 11.1 mg/1. These values were exceeded in the
samples collected during the investigation.
Number of violations: 1
1. Unlawfully discharging formaldehyde (a hazardous
substance) onto the lands and into the waters of the
State.
2. Failing to immediately notify the Department of the
discharge.
3. Unlawfully discharging ammonium hydroxide (a hazardous
substance) onto the lands of this State.
3. Duration of violation(s):
The discharge occurred on or about July 30, 1990. The spill
was not reported to the Department until the following
morning July 31, 1990. On or about August 1, 1990, ammonium
hydroxide was applied to the contaminated soil.
4. Degree and Extent of Violation(s):
Wright Corporation spilled a reportable quantity of
formaldehyde· on.to the ground and into surface waters of the
State. The Corporation failed to immediately notify this
Department of the spill. Reporting was delayed more than
fifteen hours after the spill occurred. The Corporation
failed to collect stream samples or to observe the stream to
determine if a fish kill occurred. DEM sampling indicated
that at least 1 1/2 to 2 miles of Livingston Creek contained
levels of formaldehyde in the tidal creek. In addition, the
Wright Corporation applied 600 gallons of ammonium hydroxide
to the affected areas without approval or knowledge of the
Department.
• •
Assessment Factors
Wright Corporation
Page two
5. Cause of violations:
6 •
7 •
The discharge of formaldehyde is considered to be negligence
on the part of the company. The employee responsible for
filling the tank truck left the area. The lack of due and
proper attention to the loading caused/contributed to the
tank being overfilled. Failure to immediately notify the
Department is considered to be willful. The Corporation has
been repeatedly informed to notify this Department in the
event of an emergency. The Wright Corporation then
intentionally discharged ammonium hydroxide to the areas
affected by the formaldehyde.
Economic benefit gained by violator by noncompliance:
None.
Type of violator and general nature of business:
Wright Corporation is a corporation which operates and
exists under the laws of the State of North Carolina. The
Corporation produces sulfuric acid, formaldehyde, and
hexamine.
8. Violator's history of compliance or noncompliance:
In the past, the Corporation has received Notices of
Violation for monitoring and reporting. The Corporation has,
on two occasions, failed to notify this Department of
illegal wastewater discharges and/or spills. On three
occasions, the Corporation was issued Notices of Violation
for making outlets to waters of the State by discharging
wastewater without having applied for and received a permit.
In addition, the Corporation was assessed civil penalties in
the amount of $2,213.00 on October 19, 1989, for operating a
discharge system and a nondischarge system after each of the
permits had expired. An enforcement action has been
recommended for stream standard violations occurring on or
before February 13, 1990.
The Corporation has violated Groundwater standards in the
past and has been issued several Notices of Violation by the
Division's Groundwater Section.
A complete enforcement history is included in this report as
Attachment F.
• •
Assessment Factors
Wright Corporation
Page Three
9 • Violator's degree of cooperation or recalcitrance:
The Corporation has had a history of failing to report
spills or discharges, constructing bypasses and outlets, and
for the most part ignores or fails to obtain approval until
discovered. Less than adequate communication has existed
between the Corporation and the Department in the past.
10. costs of detecting violation, defining its extent, and
bringing enforcement action:
The cost of this investigation including laboratory costs is
$2200.80. A breakdown of these costs is included in the
Regional Office Recommendations.
11. Mitigating circumstances, such as noncompliance attributable
to Government or factors beyond the violator's control:
None
Investigator Date
Water Quality Regional Supervisor Date
Regional Supervisor Date
• •
REGIONAL OFFICE RECOMMENDATIONS
Pursuant to the authority granted under NCGS 143-215.91.(a),
it is recommended that the Wright Corporation be assessed civil
penalties for violations of NCGS 143-215.83.(a), and 143-215.85.
as follows:
1. NCGS 143-215.83.(a). The Wright Corporation unlawfully
discharged formaldehyde, a hazardous substance, in excess of
the reportable quantity, onto lands and into the waters of
the State on July 30, 1990.
2. NCGS 143-215.85. The Wright Corporation failed to
immediately notify the Department of the unlawful discharge
of formaldehyde occurring at 1822 hours on July 30, 1990.
The spill was not reported for more than 15 hours (after the
Corporation became aware of the spill) at 0937 hours on
July 31, 1990.
3. NCGS 143-215.83.(a). The Wright Corporation unlawfully
discharged approximately 600 gallons of ammonium hydroxide,
a hazardous substance, onto lands of the State on or about
August 1, 1990, without approval or knowledge from the
Department.
It is recommended that the investigative costs which
total $2200.80. incurred in bringing this action, be recovered.
Michael Williams 36 hours@ $20.52/hr
Paul Rawls -16 hours@ $15.38/hr
Kirk McDonald -11 hours@ $15.00/hr
Milage-3 Trips@ 70 miles each@ .20/mi
Use of Boat and Motor
Laboratory Costs as per W.B.Edwards
Lab #OW3809 through #OW3817
Total Costs Incurred
=
=
=
=
=
=
$738.72
$246.08
$165.00
$ 42.00
$ 25.00
$984.00
$2200.80
•
December 19, 1984
October 23, 1985
February 15, 1986
February 14, 1986
March 17, 1986
March 25, 1986
May 21, 1987
June 17, 1987
July 15, 1987
October 22, 1987
October 20, 1987
December 22, 1987
WRIGHT CORPORATION
ENFORCEMENT HISTORY
•
Notice of Noncompliance
TSS Violation limit 30mg/L
violation 114 mg/L
Notice of Noncompliance
Failure to submit monitoring data
Notice of Noncompliance-December 1985
Failure to record correct NPDES No.
Failure to record correct discharge No
on DMR
Notice of Noncompliance-January 1986
Failure to Record correct NPDES No.
on DMR
Notice of Noncompliance
Failure to submit original and one
copy of DMR
Notice of Noncompliance
Failure to record NPDES No. on DMR
Incorrect self-monitoring report flow
not indicated in MGD
Notice of Noncompliance
Failure to submit monthly monitoring
Notice of Violation
Failure to receive monthly monitoring
Notice of Noncompliance
Constructing outlets to surface waters
(4 inch pvc pipe, discharging boiler
blowdown) and (24 inch bypass from
equalization pond) In Violation of
NCGS 143-215.l(a)(l)
Notice of Noncompliance
Discharge of process waste into Mill
Creek (8000 gals.) *Spill reported to
DEM 16 days after occurrence -"fish
kill reported'' Violation of Permit
2361-R
Notice of Noncompliance
Making outlets to surface waters in
Violation of NCGS 143-215.1 (a)(l)
•
December 31, 1987
January 21, 1988
February 11, 1988
March 16, 1988
October 18, 1988
November 9, 1988
January 5, 1989
March 2, 1989
April 24, 1989
May 9, 1989
May 12, 1989
May 12, 1989
May 22, 1989
WRIGHT CORPORATION
ENFORCEMENT HISTORY
•
Correspondence from Wright Chemical
stating that improper discharges
eliminated.
Spill, Discharge
Wright informed state that a three
inch pvc pipe burst and discharged to
Mill Creek
Spill -1500 pounds 100 gallons of 93%
Sulfuric Acid spilled
Verbal Telephonic Notification
Re: Late DMR reports
Notice of Noncompliance
Toxicity Testing
1000-1500 Gallon Waste Water spill
November 7, 1988
Notice of Violation
Violation of "2L" Groundwater
standards
3,000-2500 Pounds of Sodium Hydroxide
spilled February 12, 1989
Notice of Violation
Failure to notify of wastewater
discharge
Notification requirements and phone
numbers provided to Wright
Notice of Violation
Operating a disposal system without a
valid permit. Permit 2361-R2 expired
Notice of Violation
Operating a disposal system without a
valid permit. Permit 2362-R2 expired
Enforcement Report
Operating a disposal system without
valid permit
•
October 19, 1989
December 1, 1989
December 6, 1989
January 12, 1990
January 29, 1990
February 2, 1990
February 13, 1990
July 16, 1990
July 30, 1990
August 1, 1990
August 13, 1990
WRIGHT CORPORATION
ENFORCEMENT HISTORY
Wright Corporation assessed $2,213.00
for 2 counts of operating a disposal
system without valid permits
5000 gallon wastewater discharge as a
result of a fire occurring 11/25/89
2270 gallons of 93% Sulfuric Acid
spilled on rail yard area
Notice of Violation
Failure to submit original and 1 copy
of November 1989 DMR
Notice of Violation
Iilegal discharges from plant site
Notice of Violation
19 Violations of "2L" Groundwater
standards violations
Extensive sampling investigation of
site and Livingston Creek
Enforcement action completed for
violations of 143-215.l(a)(l) as a
result of 2/13/90 investigation
381 Gallon Formaldehyde spill
notification not made until 7/31/90
Company discharges approximately 600
gallons of Ammonium Hydroxide on areas
affected by Formaldehyde without
approval or notice
Notice of Violation
NCGS 143-215.85 & 143-215.83 for
7/30/90 through 8/1/90
0 u
(f
·o
rJ
rl
~
(J •) . iJ
v.!
D
••
I .
I
·,
I I
I
I I.
I
I
i
i
I
-I
,; .,
i "
_,
•
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
Wilmington Regional Office
James C. Martin, Governor
William W Cobey, Jr., Secretary
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEl-lEN'I'
Mr. tan Dettman
Wright OJ.emical Corporation
P. O. Box 402
Riegelwood, North caro1ina 28456
November 28, 1990
Bob Jamieson
Regional Mana1,>er
SUbject: Response to Your September 7, 1990
Letter
Fonnaldehyde Spill
Wright Chemical Corporation
Acne
Coltnnbus County
Dear Mr. Dettman:
We have received your September 7, 1990 letter in which you state your concerri
about your analyses results arrl the problem of distinguish:in;J between hexamine arrl
fonnaldehyde. We are currently consw.tin;J with our laboratory staff on this matter
arrl do not consider this issue closed. As soon as we receive an opinion arrl
possible solution from our staff chemists, we will contact you am request specific
steps which should be taken at this site. Until then, any further action on your
part COnceITlin;J the subject spill can be held in abeyance.
If you have any questions, call me at [phone].
Kl'M,/lfc
cc:~
Kirk W. McDonald, P.G.
Hydrogeologist
n25 Wrightsville Avenue, Wilmington, NC 28403-3696 • Telephone [phone] • Fax 919-256-Bm
An Equal Opportunity Affirmarivi:-Action Employt:r
MEMJRANDJM
'ID: Ray Kelling
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
November 20, 1990
Rick Shiver 'l;_'SS
• SUBTIX:l': Request to Provide Review and Comment
Analytical Test for Fomaldehyde
Wright Oiemical Corporation
Acme
Columbus County
I appreciate your willingness to help us resolve the issue of whether hexamine interferes with the fomaldehyde test that Oxford laboratory uses to analyze soil and water samples collected from the subject facility. Attached for your review are copies of pertinent co=espondence that will help you with this project.
Once again, thanks. Call me if 'r can help.
RSS/lfc
Attachments
cc: Wi.RO--GWS V
P.O. BOX 402
• • WRIGHT CORPORATION
Rick Shiver
NCDEHNR-DEM
7225 Wrightsville Avenue
Wilmington, NC 28403-3696
Dear Mr. Shiver:
November 9, 1990
In reference to our discussions on formaldehyde (HCHO>
analysis, please find enclosed fax received from Oxford
Laboratories, Inc. Per Roger Oxford, this method is what is
used for determination of formaldehyde in any sample we
would send him. Any questions on the method should be
directed to Roger Oxford at [phone].
If you require more information, please feel free to contact
me.
Sincerely,
WRIGHT co¼:~.ON a__ ~
Dann Dettman
Governmental Affairs Officer
DD:nl
Enclosure
~ .t: .:,
.I>~ ,.):
RECEIVED
NOV 131990
WIimington Reslonal Office
OEM j "tr.· j
• RIEGELWOOD, N.C. 28456 • TELEPHONE [phone] • FAX [phone]
I; .
f·-I r
(S:1 : .. '
C:;:1 :·. -,
' ,.
er-,
o,,
Oxford Laboratories, Inc.
FAX [phone]
COVER.SHEET
P.l/2
Analytical and Consulting Chemists 1,
1316 South Fifth Street
Wilmington, N.C. 28401
[phone]
DA'rE, /; -'l -· ci o _____ _;__ ___ .,:____ _________ _
TO, ]) o.-,~ YJ r JD'.'' (LJ ,J uJ Ju~ ·3Kf C/(L,~ ,
FROM: 2 7.t,,0 {),I_/,, I fLJl . . u .
NUMBER OF PAGES: .;J. (INCLUDES COVER SHEET) ------
RECEIVED
NOV 131990
Wilmington Regional Office
DEM I .
l
(.. '..., 'WRlc/ttT CORPORAT~N-
Mr. Preston Howard
Regional Supervisor
NCDEHNf,-DEM
7225 Wrightsville Avenue Wi . .lmington, NC 2840'..cl·-3696
Dear Mr. Howard:
FILE, CODE: \, J P-\ Cr H T
Cl I') r\ IC AL ( 0
_BR-CAXco_ou __ NH_ON_PE
This letter is intended to mal<e you aware of a matter, which has us concerned here at Wright Corporation. We l1ave referred to it in letters and discussed it with your staff members in the past. Our· concern is the results being reported by both Wright Corporation and DEM when testing for formaldehyde.
During the analytical procedure for formaldet1yde 1 an acidification step is perfor,ned, wt1ich is necessary to achieve final results for the colorimetric analysis. The problem is that if l1ezamine is present, it will breakdown to its original components, ammonia and formaldehyde. Each molecule of hexamine will .liberate six molecules of formaldehyde, or 1 ppm hexamine equals 1.2 ppm formaldehyde upon complete disassociation. This breakdown also effects ammonia analysis as the sample is preserved in sulfuric acid upon collectioh.
We have confirmed testing errors b~ making up solutions of known concentrations of hexamine without formaldehyde present. These were submitted to an outside lab for analysis. Their testing results reported in excess of 3000 ppm formaldehyde. Recent soil sampling results reported to your office showed high formaldehyde levels, but noted on the report the inaccuracy of the data.
We recently became aware of an alternative method that EPA is looking at for approval, which accurately determines formaldehyde without interferences from hexamine. At this time we have been unable to locate the method, but have several laboratories looking into it. We also have received a procedure from Dr. Sayed of UNC-W, which has been shown to give accurate results, but is not an approved method. We are gathering data into a report, which will be submitted to the appropriate state of~icial for approval a\j an alternative method, , l
J
'
w:i::~i:,,:)nl) ri:c-gio1rnl ()t-fi,;•r
ntt1v1
l P.O. BOX 402 • RIEGELWOOD, N.C. 28456 TELEPHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
I Mr. Preston !Iowa.
August 22, .1990
Page 2 •
Until such time that another non-interfering method is in use, I hope you take into consideration the fact that all reported formaldehyde numbers, whether from NPDES reports, groundwater monitoring, or other may actually be erroneous due to the possibility of hexamine being present. Although I don't believe it is the case, if the state or contract laboratories ar~ using a method that does not result in hexamine interference; we would like to know the procedure so we can submit accurate data wl1en reporting is 1~equired.
Any· gui_da.nc..e.. or assistance you can proVide in this matter would be appreciated.
DD:nl
Sincerely,
WRIGHT CORPORATION
1!J ~"-th7t6~/'7-,
Dann Dettman
Governmental Affairs Officer
I I •
j
/\UG 2 '1 1990
Wi\:r,i;1e:tc,r1 Re-aional Of/\C<) ·,EM
..
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
THROUGH:
RE:
•
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
GROUNDWATER SECTION
November 15, 1990
Rick Shiver, Groundwater Supervisor
Wilmington°j£e ional Office
Bill Reid
Pollution ·ontrol Branch 1)
/411 / /", <?..Mf/?JL w.,,uz-_ah.d.1 d,r, ,~!--. Perry Nelson pv ( /(',ck.-/" (}
Special Order by Consent
EMC GW #90-29 Columbus Co.
Wright Chemical Corp.
GW Incident #s 14, 15, 3832, and
Sulfuric Acid Spill Site
Attached are comments from our section and the Office
of General Counsel regarding the above SOC.
Because there are several sections (i.e., Paragraphs)
in the SOC that do not conform to our current shell
document, I have attached a copy for your information.
If you have any questions, please call me.
llb
Attachments
• •
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
512 North Salisbury Street • Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
James G. Martn, Governor
William W. Cobey, Jr., Secretary
John C. Hunter
General Counsel
MEMO
TO:
FROM:
RE:
Linda
Peter
Blalock
Rascoe q~
October 17, 1990
Rtct,vto
ocr , " p V
Wright Corporation so'8l',lrto.,.;-tm ., .
NTRoL BRAN,cH
Office of General Counsel
Ed'Mn L Gavin II
David G. Heeter
James C. Holloway
Robert R. Gelblum
Elizabeth E. Rouse
john P. Barl<ley
J. Peter Rascoe. Ill
Leigh L Stallings
Billy R. Godwn
I would suggest that this SOC be rewritten to conform to the
Section's latest shell revision. If that is not feasible, then
the following comments are suggested for the above SOC:
1. Paragraph l.G.: Since there is no clear language
stating that the Wright Corporation is the responsible
party, I would begin Paragraph 1.G: by saying "Wright's
noncompliance .....
2. Paragraph 2.B.: Add the following sentence to the end
of this paragraph,'' The remedial action plan is
incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit 1 as a part
of this Special Order by Consent."
3. Paragraph 2.K.: Add the following sentence to the end
of this paragraph," The remedial action plan is
incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit 1 as a part
of this Special Order by Consent.''
4. Paragraph 2.M.: Add the following sentence to the end
of this paragraph," The remedial action plan is
incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit 1 as a part
of this Special Order by Consent.''
5. Paragraph 4: The current Paragraph IV of the Section's
shell SOC should be substituted for Paragraph 4.
6. Paragraph 5: Rewrite the first sentence "No later than
fourteen ( 14) calendar days after any date or time
identified for accomplishment of any activity listed in
P.O. Box 27687 • Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 • Telephone [phone]_
An Equal Opportunity Affinnative Action Employer
• •
~A. through P. above or in the remedial action plan,
submit ... 11
7. 1) Paragraph 6 must incorporate the language of
Paragraph VI of the Section's shell document.
PR/sd
2) Paragraph 6.a. should read: "Failure to comply
with the schedule of events in -tl'..A. through M. or any
condition or term of the remedial action plan.
8. Paragraph 7 should read as follows:
"For good cause shown, the Commission, through the
Director of the Division of Environmental Management,
may extend any of the deadlines referred in Paragraph 6
above. Good cause shall include Acts of God, delays in
receiving analytical results, or other causes beyond
the control of Wright that the Director may recognize.
Requests for extension deadlines shall be made as soon
as possible and in writing. The Director may approve
such extensions only if in his sole discretion, good
cause exists. Extensions shall be granted in writing."
• • NORTH CAROLINA
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMISSION
COUNTY OF COLUMBUS
IN THE MATTER OF THE)
WRIGHT CORPORATION)
CONCERNING THE VIOLATION OF)
THE UNDERGROUND WATER QUALITY)
STANDARDS OCCURRING)
AT INCIDENT NUMBERS 14, 15,)
3832, AND AT THE SITE OF THE)
_SULFURIC ACID SPILL.)
SPECIAL ORDER BY CONSENT
EMC GW No. qo -..,1..'J
Pursuant to North Caro+ina General Statute 14 3-215. 2, this
Special Order by Consent~5:ffi-made and entered into by the Wright
Corporation, hereinafter referred to as Wright, and the
Environmental Management Commission, agency of. the State of North
Carolina created by NCGS 143-282, hereinafter referred to as the
Commission:
::,:::. Wright and the Commission do hereby stipulate the following:
A. Wright began operation at its Acme facility in 1883.
Currently, Wright manufactures formaldehyde, hexamine,
1 sulfuric acid, and chloropicrin. Nondischarge Permit No.
Q ~ 2361-R2 authorized Wright to operate a lagoon-type
~ _ 7\,~ wastewater treatment system followed by spray irrigation · ~.Ji-✓-~ onto a ten ( 10) acre and twenty ( 2 O) .acre tract. Perml t -~Y°'° rNo. 2361-R2 expired on March 1, 1989 .
..)_..,,7·~ · · B. Wright was issued Notices of• Violation on January 5,
1989 and February 2, 1990 for exceeding of the
following standards at its perimeter of compliance
around the ten (10) acre spray field: total ~issolved
solids, sulfate, nitrates, formaldehyde, chromium,
iron, and manganese. On May 12, 1989, Wright was issued
Notices of Violation for operating a lagoon and
spray field system (previously authorized by
Nondischarge Permit No. 2361-R2) without a permit and
discharging wastewater in surface waters without a
permit (NPDES Permit NC0003395 authorizes the discharge
of cooling waters, boiler blowdown, and water softner.
regeneration waters only). On January 16, 1990, Wright
submitted analytical data from monitor well 16 which .
showed the sulfuric acid spill which occurred on t~""Q.;:..J,.., ,_,,,;
plant site on December 6, 1989,(caused,lcontributecl.Jto 'de.?
the violation of the following standards at the IY'-vi.I ;.;;t.,
perimeter of compliance: pH, total dissolved solids, and ~-
sulfate. On January 29, 1990, Wright was issued a
Notice of Violation for the illegal discharge of
wastewater from seeps and springs into Livingston Creek
in the vicinity of the wastewater lagoons. Livingston
Creek is classified as class "C swam~waters .31,-this
State~ in.-------the~ap~ear River Basin . .____.,,,, '-..____.-/ '-------' '-..__.../ '-..__...../ '-..____,/
• • C. This matter concerns sources of groundwater
contamination that originate on a parcel of property
located at Acme, Columbus County, North Carolina. This
matter has been designated as Incident Numbers 14, 15,
3832, and the site of the sulfuric acid spill by the
Groundwater Section of the Division of Environmental
Management (Division) of the Department of Environment,
Health, and Natural Resources (Department). The sour.ces
of contamination include the sulfuric acid spill, the
plant site including the lagoons, the ten (10) acre
spray field, and the twenty (20) acre spray field.
D. Wright is the owner of the subject property. Wright has
received the necessary authorization fro.m all record
property owners to undertake the activities listed in
g,aragraph]I:. -E. The perimeter of compliance for the lagoons and
spray fields is established at a horizontal distance of
500 feet from the waste boundary or at the property
boundary, whichever is closer to the source. At the
sulfuric acid spill site, no cpmpliance boundary exists
for this source: underneath this site, Class GA
groundwaters begin at the top of the saturated zone.
Attachment I shows a map with the compliance boundaries
of the permitted facilities.
F. The maximum allowable contaminants levels for Class GA
Waters found in 15A NCAC 2L .202 are being exceeded for
the following constituents within or outside of the
perimeter of compliance: pH, total dissolved solids,~·
sulfate, nitrates, formaldehyde, chromium, iron, and~
manganese.
G. That noncompliance with Class GA water standards
constitutes causing and contributing to the pollution
of the waters of this State named above, and Wright is
within the jurisdiction of the Commission as set forth
in NCGS Chapter 143, Article 21 ..
H. Within the past five years, Wright has spent $1.20
million on environmental improvements. Within the next
two years, furthermore, it is projected that Wright
will spend $3.99 million to correct the air, surface
water, and groundwater problems at its Acme facility.
I. Wright hereby waives its right to an administrative
hearing authorized by NCGS 143-215.2 on the terms of
this Special Order by Consent, and also waives its right
to seek judicial review of this Special Order by Consent
as provided in NCGS 143-215.5.
• • Wright, desiring to comply with the legal requirements of
the Commission regarding underground·water quality standards
and with all pertinent provisions of the law and applicable
rules of the Commission does hereby agree to do and perform
the following activities:
A. Discontinue/use of its ten (10) acre and twenty (20)
acre spray field on or before January 31, 1990. (met)
B. Submit to the Division a remedial action plan to
eliminate the springs and seeps in the lagoon area which
are discharging wastewater into Livingston Creek,
classified ''C Swamp'' waters of this State on or before
February 28, 1990. (met)
C. Install and operate the facilities identified in the
remedial action plan specified in 2 B. within ninety
(90) days of receiving approval from the Division.
D. Submit{{/to the Division an application for a
nondischarge permit to construct and operate a lined
2,300,000 gallon lagoon to store its wastewater until
Wright has applied for and obtained from the Division an
NPDES Permit or nondischarge permit to treat and dispose
of its wastewater without violating surface water or
groundwater quality standards on or before
March 31, 1990. (met)
E. Submit an application for an NPDES permit to discharge
process wastewater/contaminated ground water on or
before April 31, 1990. (met)
F. Install and operate the storage lagoon identified in
2 D. within 90 days of the issuance.of a permit by
the Division but no later than September 30, 1990.
G. Wright will conduct a study to determine a
treatment/disposal alternative (discharge wastewater
into surface waters or pursue a nondischarge option, and
advise the Division of the results of the feasibility
study as well as the selected alternative on or before
December 31, 1990.
H. Submit plans and specifications for the selected
treatment/disposal alternative on or before
July 1, 1991.
I. Begin construction of the selected treatment/disposal
facilities within sixty (60) days of approval by the
Division but no later than December 31, 1991.
J. Complete construction and place in operation the
treatment/disposal facilities on or before
December 31, 1992.
• • K. Submit to the Division a remedial action plan that will
provide for the restoration of impacted groundwater
underneath the sulfuric acid spill site on or before
June 15, 199 O. (met)
L. Submit to the Division a report assessing the extent and
significance of exceedances of standards at and beyond
the perimeter of compliance around the ten (10) acre
spray field on or before April 30, 1990. (met)
M. Submit to the Division a remedial action plan for
restoring the groundwater quality to GA standards on or
before May 15, 1990. (met)
N. Should the Division determine the operational unlined
lagoons are causing or contributing to water quality
standard violations in Livingston Creek, Wright will
line or abandon the lagoons within six (6) months of
receipt of a Notice of Violation.
o. Any lagoon taken out of service must be lined in a
manner as to ensure the wastewater will not cause and/or
ccintribute to groundwater quality and/or water quality
yiolations prior to the lagoon being returned to
§rvice. !
P. Prior to permanently abandoning any lagoon ( Wright must
submit to the Division and obtain approval for a Closure
Plan for each lagoon.
Wright shall properly operate and maintain the facility so
as to minimize the impact of groundwater contamination and .
leaching/seeping of wastewater to the surface waters'i~-d...., ~,p_
,<.f -~c. tl,;, soc i,, IN R ,~-,::i; .
.>""': Thise.1 shall remain in effect until July 1, 1995. W'l'."ighss
. ~J.J .ag.;i;ees an¥--i::emed-i-a-1=--i0n-ac-t--iv-i-t--ies-commenced-pursuant---t,o
~/a_a-r--ag-Fa-ph :JI"& o-f--the--0'l?der-sha-l-l-e0F1-t--i-nue--beyemd-t-he~
(J)J.J ~ ~i-r--a-t--io-fl-d-a-t:e-1Hl-1ess-mod-i-f-ica-t-i-ons-a-re-a-ppr0ved-by-the___
~ ~ . -Comm±ss-ion--,-
~;:;?J. No later than fourteen (14) calendar days after any date or
time identified for accjm~sh~~nt of any activity listed
in $-•A, through P. above, 11 ~crbm1't_,. 'to the Di vision Director and
the Wilmington Regional Office written notification of
compliance or noncompliance therewith. In the case of
noncompliance, the notice shall include a statement of the
reason ( s) for noncomplianc_e, remedial action ( s) · taken, and a
statement identifying the extent to which subsequent dates
or times for accomplishment of listed activities may be
effected. This provision does not apply to the submission of
monitoring reports.
11'--
/U-V a±t:9-e.£) ~ ~ •
Wright ~e~ !~fs~~cused und<:J>~a:ragraph,if, Wri9,M.
will pay the Commissro;; accordinJ.--to---the following_sch'edule
for fai--:ni're t.s.--,meet the de~nes set out in paragraph 2 of
th i.s/4 rd er.:------· ____./ '
Deadlines and Requirements
a. Failure to comply with the
schedule of events in
:i:r.12 A, through M. • •
b. Failure to comply with the
schedule of events in
::JJ'.-, ~ N, through P~.
Stipulated Penalty
$2,000
$5,000 (single
penalty)
Payments shall be made by certified check, made payable to
the "Department of Environment, Health, and Natural
Resources", and shall be made within fourteen (14) days
following demand by the Director of the Division of
Environmental Management.
Wright and the Commission agree that the stipulated
penalties are not due if Wright' satisfies the Division that
non-compliance was caused by events or circumstances beyond
Wright's control. Any 'dispute over the stipulated penalty
shall be determined by the Office of Administrative
Hearings. Such determination shall be initiated by either
party by filing a petition for a hearing with the Office of
Administrative ~earings pursuant to NCGS 143-215.2(b) and
NCGS 150B-23.
Nothing in this~ shall prevent Wright from seeking a
variance, reclassification or permit which if granted by the
Commission may affect Wright's obligation5 i.v,..J.t,c., -ct..... .soc.
t.,)fl,IG-H-T" , Soc.. .
;i,T'<'hl.fel-'C.;..oommlfll18'l-Ss-'!:Orr agrees that this ~de·l!' shall pertai~1_51_Q~. to
the source and property identified in ~.c.;;o.unress
an applicable Special Order or permit has been issued by the
~
., J~ Commission, violations of groundwater and/oi surface water
~/ quality standards resulting from additional sources for
~ which Wright is responsible may subject Wright to all ~ sanctions provided by North Carolina General Statute.s
143-215. 6. /1-3--~15",i;;.
• • --<1(_ .:So c. y This G-Fde-r is
occupiers of
Commission for
-xrr ----This the
BY:
BY:
not transferable. Any successive owners or
the subject property must apply to the
a separate Special Order by Consent.
day of ----------' 1990.
Wright Corporation
(Title)
Chairman, Environmental Management Commission
•
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF
IN THE MATTER OF )
)
)
)
REGARDING THE VIOLATION OF )
THE UNDERGROUND WATER QUALITY)
STANDARDS OCCURRING AT )
INCIDENT NO. ________ )
60C. jcLL
BEFORE THE NORTH CAROLINA
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
COMMISSION
SPECIAL ORDER BY CONSENT
EMC GW # _______ _
This SPECIAL ORDER BY CONSENT (SOC) is made and entered
into pursuant to North Carolina General Statute 143-215.2,
by and between ______ , hereinafter referred to as
______ , and the Environmental Management Commission, an
agency of the State of North Carolina, hereinafter known as
the COMMISSION.
WITNESSETH:
I.
as follows:
and the COMMISSION do hereby stipulate
A. Brief paragraph identifying the responsible
party (RP), the facility, RP's business,· etc.
B. This matter concerns a so.urce of groundwater
contamination originating on a parcel of property located at
______ , ______ County, North Carolina. This matter
has been designated as Incident No. ___ by the Groundwater
Section of the Division of Environmental Management of the
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources.
The source of the contamination is
C. ______ is the owner of the subject
property. ______ has received the necessary
authorization from all record property owners to undertake
the activities listed in Paragraph II.
OR
C. ______ leases the property from
______ , who is the owner of the property, and has
permission from the owner of the property and from all
record property owners to undertake the activities listed in
Paragraph II.
D. Statement regarding results of staff
investigation or results of consultant's report.
1
• •
E. The maximum allowable contaminant levels for
Class ___ waters found at 15A NCAC 2L ___ are being
exceeded for the following constituents:
Constituent Concentration·
[list]
F. Paragraph(s) stating the actions RP has taken
to date to remedy the pollution, including costs spent by RP
to date.
II. The ______ , desiring to comply with the legal
requirements of the COMMISSION regarding underground water
quality standards and with all pertinent provisions of the
law and applicable rules of the COMMISSION does hereby agree
to do and perform the following activities:
[Set out individual paragraphs with deadlines for
each task the RP must take. Be as specific and precise as
possible.]
III. The ______ shall properly (operate and)
maintain the [site/facility, etc.] so as to minimize the
impact of groundwater contamination during the period this
soc is in effect.
IV. This SOC shall remain in effect until
months/years after the date of its approval. If prior to
180 days before the expiration of the SOC, all the
requirements of Paragraph II. have not been met, then the
(RP/COMPANY) and the COMMISSION shall enter into an
extension of this SOC, or shall enter into a subsequent SOC,
for a term of ___ months/years and subsequent terms if
necessary, until such requirements are met.
V. The ______ shall submit no later than
fourteen (14) days after the deadline for completing each
item required in Paragraph II. certification to the Director
of the Division of Environmental Management whether such
item has been performed. This provision does not apply to
the submission of monitoring reports.
2
• •
VI. In the event the _____ does not comply with
any of the terms of this SOC, it may be subject to civil
penalties and all other sanctions provided by North Carolina
General Statutes 143-215.2. The (RP/COMPANY) agrees to pay
penalties to the COMMISSION according to the following
schedule for failure to meet the deadlines set out in
Paragraph II:
Deadlines and Requirements Stipulated Penalties
[list)
VII. Nothing in this SOC shall prevent the
from seeking a variance, reclassification or permit which,
if granted by the COMMISSION, may affect ______ 's
obligations under this SOC.
VIII. The---~--agrees that this SOC shall pertain
only to the source and property identified in Paragraph I.B.
of this SOC. Unless an applicable Special Order or permit
has been issued by the COMMISSION, violations of groundwater
quality standards resulting from additional sources for
which the---~--is responsible may subject the
to all sanctions provided by )'!Orth Carolina
General Statutes 143-215.5 and 143-215.6.
IX. The-~-~~-hereby agrees to waive any rights
it may have to seek judicial review to challenge this SOC or
to seek a stay of enforcement of this SOC. However, the
COMMISSION acknowledges that this waiver does not prohibit
the~~--~-from seeking amendment of this SOC if any
regulatory standards or other grounds upon which this SOC is
based are changed subsequent to its execution. In such
cases, the~-----may petition that the SOC be amended
to reflect those regulatory or other grounds for change or
upon other grounds satisfactory to the COMMISSION.
X. This SOC is not transferable. Any successive
owners or occupiers of the subject property must apply to
the COMMISSION for a separate SOC.
3
• •
XI. If ______ proposes to change any of
activities set out in Paragraph II. above,
apply to the COMMISSION for a modification to this
This the day of 19
the
must
soc.
[COMPANY NAME]
ATTESTED: BY: ____________ _
(Title)
(Address)
APPROVED AND ACCEPTED:
BY:
Chairman, Environmental Management Commission
Approved by the Environmental Management Commission on the
day of ______ , 19
SOC Ver. 1 .0
5/22/90
4
w r,',j 11 ~ C' I-,. -Col= bus • • WRIGHT CORPORATION
Mr. Wayne Cook
NCDEHNR-DEM
7225 Wrightsville Avenue
Wilmington, NC 28403-3595
Dear Mr. Cook:
September 7, 1990
K \ r.:,_ \L. I
P L 'C A '::, ~ \--;,_ 'L. _
V \ 'C. Lv A h · t::,
Co--7/t'C r-, ,.. . , . 1
t"::>..5 S
9-L4
In response to your letter dated September 5, 1990, Wright
Corporation must take exception with the Agency's view that
formaldehyde still exists in the soil below the excavated areas as
a result of the July 30, 1990 spill. If you choose to ignore the
laboratory report or my letter of August 22, 1990, both which note
the unavoidable interference from hexamine when testing for
formaldehyde, then heavy formaldehyde contamination in the soil
would appear to be the case. If the reported values were true, I
am puzzled as to why no odor of formaldehyde could be detected in
the soil where the highest values were reported. Even the field
personnel investigating the spill had difficulty detecting
formaldehyde or describing the smells other than ammonia at some
points, with the exception of the area next to the truck loading
pad which collected most 0£ the spill and, interestingly enough,
showed the lowest £ormaldehyde value in the lab report.
In reference to the recommendation 0£ installing monitoring wells
to determine the extent 0£ contamination resulting £ram the spill,
I question the need or value of such an assessment. We presently
have 21 monitoring wells on this site, several 0£ which are already
in the vicinity or downgradient 0£ the spill site. We have been
reporting £ormaldehyde numbers £ram these wells since 1988. In
light 0£ the analytical di££iculties previously re£erred to, until
an alternative method is £ound and approved, I do not £eel· reliable
information could be obtained. Considering the £ast response to
the spill and the large amount of soil excavated £ram the area, I
£eel any contribution £ram this incident would be minimal and
di££icult to de£ine. I am sure you are aware of the long history
0£ manu£acturing at this site.
In re£erence to the french drain, it would be absolutely impossible
to divert the outlet to the lined pond. The drainage system is
handling stormwater £ram several acres on the plant site and the
volume would be £ar too great to contain and treat at this time.
We will, upon approval to £ill in the excavated areas, place soil
in place 0£ the removed rocks, thereby eliminate the £rench drain
and any need £or a NPDES permit.
P.O. BOX 402 • RIEGELWOOD, N.C. 28456 TELEPHONE [phone] • FAX [phone]
• Wayne Cook
September 7, 1990
Page 2
•
As £or the excavated materials, we will once again have di££icblty differentiating hexamine and formaldehyde during analytical procedures. We have recently removed the •plastic covering from the contained materials and noted a alight ammonia odor as well as i fungus or mold like odor £ram the soils. No formaldehyde odor was detected by either smell or with detector tubes. By a letter dated August 23, DSWM conveyed that the material was not a hazardous waste under RCRA and disposal should be coordinated through DEM. As such, I request we be allowed to dispose 0£ the materials on-site by placing them into our waste pond known as the spill basin.
As a result 0£ the spill, we have redesigned and improved the containment system to prevent an incident like we had £ram occurring again. Construction has started and should be completed by the end 0£ this week except £or some asphalt work which is waiting £or £ill in approval. To date we have spent nearly $15,000 with much greater coats yet expected to come. We realize our incurred coat do not influence your actions, and we are certainly not attempting to lessen the seriousness 0£ this situation, however, we £eel our response and clean-up was thorough.
Respectfully submitted,
WRIGHT CORPORATION
Dann Dettman
Governmental Affairs 0££icer
DD:nl
• •
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
Wilmington Regional Office
· James C. Martin, Governor
William W. Colx-y, Jr., Secretary September 5, 1990
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. Dann Dettman
Governmental Affairs Officer
Wright Corporation
P.O. Box 402
Riegelwood, N.C. 28456
Bob Jamieson
Regional 1\1i1.nagcr
subject: Reply to Your Letters-August 17, 1990 and August 24, 1990
Dear Mr. Dettman:
Wright Corporation-Formaldehyde Spill
Columbus County
Your letter of August 17, 1990, requested information pertaining to reportable quantities; please find attached a copy of 40 CFR Part 117 dated Monday August 14, 1989. Also attached is a copy of the North Carolina General Statutes 143-215.75 through 143-215.92 "Oil Pollution and Hazardous Substances Control". Requirements for notification are ~ound under NCGS 143-215.85.
The soil sample results which you provided indicates the presence of formaldehyde at all of the location's sampled. You requested permission to back fill the excavated areas and repave them as soon as possible. The results of the samples submitted do not demonstrate that sufficient clean-up has taken place; therefore, backfilling is not appropriate at this time. It is the recommendation of our Groundwater Section that prior to backfilling excavated areas the Corporation retain a consultant for the purpose of defining the vertical and horizontal extent of the contamination, including the installation of groundwater monitoring wells.
Your letter of August 24, 1990, requested blanket approval be issued for the application of ammonium hydroxide in the event of future formaldehyde spills. Alternatively, it is suggested that the Corporation contact this Division and the Division of Solid waste Management immediately upon discovering any future spill.
n25 Wrightsville Avenue, Wilmington. 1'-i.C. 28403-3696 • "Telephone 919-256-.-4161 • l~x 91~1-256-8572
Mr. Dann Dettman
August 31, 1990
Page Two
• •
An assessment will then be made to determine the best means for
collection and removal. If removal is not deemed feasible by the
Department; remediation activities, including the application of
ammonium hydroxide may then be considered. Authorization by the
Division must be granted prior to chemical treatment or
dispersal.
The french drain in the area of the plant site near the
formaldehyde spill is considered to be an outlet to waters of the
state, and as such must either be permitted by this Division or
redirected to the lined waste treatment pond. Samples collected
near the point of discharge indicate that the drainage system
conveyed formaldehyde to adjacent surface waters. Within sixty
days, the Wright Corporation must submit a complete NPDES permit
application for this source, or notify this Division in writing
that the french drain has been redirected to the lined pond.
The contaminated soils which were excavated from the site
must be disposed of in a manner consistent with the requirements
of the Division of Solid Waste Management. According to Solid
Waste Management personnel the excavated soils may be considered
a hazardous waste if they exhibit the presence of formaldehyde.
You should contact the Division of Solid Waste Management, and
follow their direction (including a laboratory analysis of the
material as it exists on site) to determine if the excavated
soils are considered a hazardous waste. The Corporation must
inform this Office prior to removal of the contaminated soils
from their present location.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please
contact Mr. Mike Williams, Mr. Dave Adkins, or me at (919)
256-4161.
MW:WRIGHT.REP
Sincerely,
OIIIGINAL SIGM£11 11D
_&;. W/AlM~ 11151
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E.
Regional Supervisor
cc: ,Thomas H. Wright; III J
Flint Worrell
Rick ShiverV
WiRO
Central Files
, •
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
MEIDRANIJJM
'ID: Perry Nelson
FR:M: Rick Shiver
SUBJECT: Non=nforming SOC
Wright Chemical Company
Acme
Columbus County
August 24, 1990
For delegation and review, attached is a =PY of the proposed SOC for Wright Chemical Company. This SOC is intended to redress both groundwater and surface water violations. I authored the groundwater portion and Dave Adkins authored the water quality portion. Preston has reviewed and approved it.
The staff's expedient review of it would be appreciated.
RSS/lfc
Attachment
cc: Paj;,er Rascoe
Wl.RO--GWS
WiRO-WQS
I
I
I
••
NORTH CAROLINA
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMISSION
COUNTY OF COLUMBUS
IN THE MATTER OF THE)
WRIGHT CORPORATION)
CONCERNING THE VIOLATION OF)
THE UNDERGROUND WATER QUALITY)
STANDARDS OCCURRING)
AT INCIDENT NUMBERS 14, 15,)
3832, AND AT THE SITE OF THE)
SULFURIC ACID SPILL.)
SPECIAL ORDER BY CONSENT
EMC GW No.
Pursuant to North Carolina General Statute 143-215. 2, this
Special Order by c·onsent is made and entered into by the Wright
Corporation, hereinafter referred to as Wright, and the
Environmental Management Commission, agency of the State of North
Carolina created by NCGS 143-282, hereinafter referred to as the
Commission:
1. Wright and the Commission do hereby stipulate the following:
A. Wright began operation at its Acme facility in 1883.
Currently, Wright manufactures formaldehyde, hexamine,
sulfuric acid, and chloropicrin. Nondischarge Permit No.
2361-R2 authorized Wright to operate a lagoon-type
wastewater treatment system followed by spray irrigation
onto a ten (10) acre and twenty (20) acre tract. Permit
No. 2361-R2 expired on March 1, 1989.
B. Wright was issued Notices of Violation on January 5,
1989 and February 2, 1990 for exceeding of the
following standards at its perimeter of compliance
around the ten (10) acre spray field: total dissolved
solids, sulfate, nitrates, formaldehyde, chromium,
iron, and manganese. On May 12, 1989, Wright was issued
Notices of Violation for operating a lagoon and
spray field system (previously authorized by
Nondischarge Permit No. 2361-R2) without a permit and
discharging wastewater in surface waters without a
permit (NPDES Permit NC0003395 authorizes the discharge
of cooling waters, boiler blowdown, and water softner
regeneration waters only). On January 16, 1990, Wright
submitted analytical data from monitor well 16 which
showed the sulfuric acid spill which occurred on the
plant site on December 6, 1989, caused/contributed to
the violation of the following standards at the
perimeter of compliance: pH, total dissolved solids, and
sulfate. On January 29, 1990, Wright was issued a
Notice of Violation for the illegal discharge of
wastewater from seeps and springs into Livingston Creek
in the vicinity of the wastewater lagoons. Livingston
Creek is classified as class "C Swamp" waters of this
State, in the Cape Fear River Basin.
• •
C. This matter concerns so_urces of groundwater
contamination that originate on a parcel of property
located at Acme, Columbus County, North Carolina. This
matter has been designated as Incident Numbers 14, 15,
3832, and the site of the sulfuric acid spill by the
Groundwater Section of the Division of Environmental
Management (Division) of the Department of Environment,
Health, and Natural Resources (Department). The sources
of contamination include the sulfuric acid spill, the
plant site including the lagoons, the ten (10) acre
spray field, and the twenty (20) acre spray field.
D. Wright is the owner of the subject property. Wright has
received the necessary authorization from all record
property owners to undertake the activities listed in
paragraph 2.
E. The perimeter of compliance for the lagoons and
spray fields is established at a horizontal distance of
500 feet from the waste boundary or at the property
boundary, whichever is closer to the source. At the
sulfuric acid spill site, no compliance boundary exists
for this source: underneath this site, Class GA
groundwaters begin at the top of the saturated zone.
Attachment I shows a map with the compliance boundaries
of the permitted facilities.
F. The maximum allowable contaminants levels for Class GA
Waters found in 1'5A NCAC 2L . 202 are being exceeded for
the following constituents within or outside of the
perimeter of compliance: pH, total dissolved solids,
sulfate, nitrates, formaldehyde, chromium, iron, and
manganese.
G. That noncompliance with Class GA water standards
constitutes causing and contributing to the .pollution
of the waters of this State named above, and Wright is
within the jurisdiction of the Commission as set forth
in NCGS Chapter 143, Article 21.
H. Within the past five years, Wright has spent $1.20
million on environmental improvements. Within the next
two years, furthermore, it is projected that Wright
will spend $3.99 million to correct the air, surface
water, and groundwater problems at its Acme facility.
I. Wright hereby waives its right to an administrative
hearing authorized by NCGS 143-215.2 on the terms of
this Special Order by Consent, and also waives its right
to seek judicial review of this Special Order by Consent
as provided in NCGS 143-215.5.
•·
2. Wright, desiring to comply with the legal requirements of
the Commission regarding underground water quality standards
and with all pertinent provisions of the law and applicable
rules of the Commission does hereby agree to do and perform
the following activities:
A. Discontinued use of its ten (10) acre and twenty (20)
acre spray field on or before January 31. 1990. (met)
B. Submit to the Division a remedial action plan to
eliminate the springs and seeps in the lagoon area which
are discharging wastewater into Livingston Creek,
classified ''C Swamp'' waters of this State on or before
February 28. 1990. (met)
C. Install and operate the facilities identified in the
remedial action plan specified in 2 B. within ninety
(90) days of receiving approval from the Division.
D. Submitted to the Division an application for a
nondischarge permit to construct and operate a lined
2,300,000 gallon lagoon to store its wastewater until
Wright has applied for and obtained from the Division an
NPDES Permit or nondischarge permit to treat and dispose
of its wastewater without violating surface water or
groundwater quality standards on or before
March 31. 1990. (met)
E. Submit an application for an NPDES permit to discharge
process wastewater/contaminated ground water on or
before April 31, 1990. (met)
F. Install and opera·te the storage lagoon identified in
2 D. within 90 days of the issuance of a permit by
the Division but no later than September 30. 1990.
G. Wright will conduct a study to determine a
treatment/disposal alternative (discharge wastewater
into surface waters or pursue a nondischarge option, and
advise the Division of the results of the feasibility
study as well as the selected alternative on or before
December 31. 1990.
H. Submit plans and specifications for the selected
treatment/disposal alternative on or before
July 1. 1991.
I. Begin construction of the selected treatment/disposal
facilities within sixty (60) days of approval by the
Division but no later than December 31. 1991.
J. Complete construction and place in operation the
treatment/disposal facilities on or before
December 31. 1992.
•
K. Submit to the Division a remedial action plan that will
provide for the restoration of impacted groundwater
underneath the sulfuric acid spill site on or before
June 15. 1990. (mE;t)
L. Submit to the Division a report assessing the extent and
significance of exceedances of standards at and beyond
the perimeter of compliance around the ten (10) acre
spray field on or before April 30, 1990. (met)
M. Submit to the Division a remedial action plan for
restoring the groundwater quality to GA standards on or
before May 15, 1990. (met)
N. Should the Division determine the operational unlined
lagoons are causing or contributing to water quality
standard violations in Livingston Creek, Wright will
line or abandon the lagoons within six (6) months of
receipt of a Notice of Violation.
o. Any lagoon taken out of service must be lined in a
manner as to ensure the wastewater will not cause and/or
contribute to groundwater quality and/or water quality
violations prior to the lagoon being returned to
service.
P. Prior to permanently abandoning any lagoon; Wright must
submit to the Division and obtain approval for a Closure
Plan for each lagoon.
3. Wright shall properly operate and maintain the facility so
as to minimize the impact of groundwater contamination and
leaching/seeping of wastewater to the surface waters.
4. This Order shall remain in effect until July 1, 1995. Wright
agrees any remediation activities commenced pursuant to
paragraph 2 of the Order shall continue beyond the
expiration date unless modifications are approved by the
Commission.
5. No later than fourteen (14) calendar days after any date or
time identified for accomplishment of any activity listed
in 2 A through P above, submit to the Division Director and
the Wilmington Regional Office written notification of
compliance or noncompliance therewith. In the case of
noncompliance, the notice shall include a statement of the
reason(s) for noncompliance, remedial action(s) taken, and a
statement identifying the extent to which subsequent dates
or times for accomplishment of listed activities may be
effected. This·provision does not apply to the submission of
monitoring reports.
6. Wright agrees that unless excused under paragraph 7, Wright
will pay the Commission according to the following schedule
for failure to meet the deadlines set out in paragraph 2 of
this Order:
Deadlines and Requirements
a. Failure to comply with the
schedule of events in
2 A through M.
b. Failure to comply with the
schedule of events in
2 N through P.
stipulated Penalty
$2,000
$5,000 (single
penalty)
Payments shall be made by certified check, made payable to
the "Department of Environment, Health, and Natural
Resources", and shall be made within fourteen (14) days
following demand by the Director of the Division of
Environmental Management.
7. Wright and the Commission agree that the stipulated
penalties are not due if Wright satisfies the Division that
non-compliance was caused by events or circumstances beyond
Wright's control. Any dispute over the stipulated penalty
shall be determined by the Office of Administrative
Hearings. Such determination shall be initiated by either
party by filing a petition for a hearing with the Office of
Administrative Hearings pursuant to NCGS 143-215.2(b) and
NCGS 150B-23.
8. Nothing in this Order shall prevent Wright from seeking a
variance, reclassification or permit which if granted by the
Commission may affect Wright's obligation.
9. The Commission agrees that this Order shall pertain only to
the source and property identified in Section.1 c .. Unless
an applicable Special Order or permit has been issued by the
Commission, violations 'of groundwater and/or surface water
quality standards resulting from additional sources for
which Wright is responsible may subject Wright to all
sanctions provided by North Carolina General Statute
143-215.6.
• •
10. This Order is not transferable. Any successive owners or
occupiers of the subject property must apply to the
Commission for a separate Special Order by Consent.
This the day of __________ , 1990.
Wright Corporation
BY:
(Title)
BY:
Chairman, Environmental Management Commission
FILE CODE: w R-1 Cr H r • • C..t:IS:D l (Al CQ·
_BfL.CA.XCO_DU_NH_QN_PE 1Ji ~:<~-"
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural.Resources
Division of Solid Waste Managemenr r ~1
_, r . -'7 [
P.O. Box 27687 · Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687
~
r I JAN 1 4. 1Q9!) James G. Martin, Governor William . Meyer William W. Cobey, Jr., Sccrclary LJ.....:.·v-~ .J u.:j ', ircclor
Mr. Dann Dettman
Governmental Affairs Officer
\!:lr-igfft CQrp_ora ti.QID
P.O. Box 402
Riegel.wood, N.C. 28456
August 23, 1990
RE: Formaldehyde Spill -July 30, 1990
Dear Mr. Dettman:
In review of your letter of August 17, 1990, this office offers the following comments:
-Tl1e spillage of commercial grade formaldehyde meets the definition of listed hazardous waste Ul22, in that it is a discarded commercial chemical product, which can no longer be used for its intended purpose.
-As part of emergency response efforts, 40 CFR 265.l(c)(ll) provides for the immediate treatment and containment of hazardous waste without complying with the RCRA disposal requirements of this part. -As part of this immediate response, the formaldehyde was rendered non-hazardous by treating it with ammonium hydroxide. -The release was not from a RCRA regulated unit (i.e., surface impoundment, waste tank, etc.).
Subsequently, the storage and disposal of the noted non-hazardous material is not regulated under RCRA, but should be coordinated through the Division of Environmental Management since you would be involving the wastewater treatment system. Now that immediate response efforts are complete, any area(s) of contamination that may contain residual levels of formaldehyde should be managed as Ul22 !1azardous waste and manifested off-site.
Sincerely,
/,., .• ~., .. ?'-/2{..,.....,-P~=--
1 Jerome H. Rhodes, Chief
Hazardous Waste Section
cc: Doug Holyfield
Preston Howard
Flint Worrell
"
i
'
WRIC..T CORPORAT•N·
Mr. Preston Howard
Regional Supervisor
NCDEHNR-DEM
7225 Wrightsville Avenue
Wilmington, NC 28403-3595
Dear Mr. Howard:
August 22, 1'3'30
FILE. CODE: 1 ¢ 2 1-;._1 cc H r
CH:S::rJ IC AL. C Q,
JLCA.ACO_DU_NILON.JE
1'his letter is intended to make you aware of a matter, which has us concerned here at Wright Corporation. We have referred to it in letters and discussed it with your staff members in the past. Our concern is the results being reported by both Wright Corporation and DEM when testing for formaldehyde,
During the analytical procedure for formaldehyde, an acidification step is performed, which is necessary to achieve final results for the colorimetric analysis. The problem is that if hexamine is present, it will breakdown to its original components, ammonia and formaldehyde. Each molecule of hexamine will liberate six molecules of formaldehyde, or 1 ppm hexamine equals 1.2 ppm formaldehyde upon complete disassociation. This breakdown also effects ammonia analysis as the sample is preserved in sulfuric acid upon collection.
We have confirmed testing errors by making up solutions of known concentrations 0£ hexamine without formaldehyde present. 1'hese were submitted to an outside lab for analysis. Their testing results reported in excess of 3000 ppm formaldehyde. Recent soil sampling results reported to your office showed high formaldehyde levels, but noted on the report the inaccuracy of the data.
We recently became aware of an alternative method that EPA is looking at for approval, which accurately determines formaldehyde without interferences from hexamine. At this time we have been unable to locate the method, but have several laboratories looking into it. We also have received a procedure from Dr. Sayed of UNC-W, which has been shown to give accurate results, but is not an approved method. We are gathering data into a report, which will be submitted to the appropriate state of~icial for approval Bi an alternative method. , [
P.O. BOX 402 • RIEGELWOOD, N.C. 28456
,,
;
W'.\:1~i•:i;·l0n TT12g'1omd Otr-i<":"
nt~M
I
TELEPHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
Mr. Preston Howa.
August 22, 1990
Page 2 •
Until such time that another non-interfering method is in use, I hope you take into consideration the fact that all reported formaldehyde numbers, whether from NPDES reports, groundwater monitoring, or other may actually be errone6us due to the possibility of hexamine being present. Although I don't believe it is the case, if the state or contract laboratories are using a method that does not result in hexamine interference, we would like to know the procedure so we can submit accurate data when reporting is required.
Any gui_danc.e. or assistance you can provide in this matter would be appreciated.
DD:nl
Sincerely,
WRIGHT CORPORATION 1v ~ a~~,,,,--
Dann Dettman
Governmental Affairs Officer
' \ ' ~ 2 •·7· 19°0 1\ .lb , ::J
Vlil:r,in[:,for, HE.Ycriorrnl Of/iC')
>EM
' l
·'
'• MEMORANDUM
• •
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
GROUNDWATER SECTION
TO: Hydrogeological Regional Supervisors
FROM: Fay Sweat~
SUBJECT: Incident Control Numbers
These are new incidents in your region for which a control
number has recently been assigned. Please use these numbers on
all future correspondence.
County Incident Name Incident#
RE:ce:,vEo
AUG 2 0 1990
t\lirm/nrrr ~ •
0 on negrona/ om . ru:r.~ ca
· POLLUTION IN~DENT/U.S.T. LEAK REP~RTING FORM
:}) Incident # Division of Environmental Management
GROUNDWATER SECTION
2. Tabulate only TYPE OF ACTION
A
B
C
D
(iJmergency Response 3. Complaint lnvesttgatton 5. U.S.T. LGak
2. Compliance Investigation 4. Routine Inventory 6. Other:
POTENTIAL HAZARDS: @axle Chemicals 2. Radioactivity (3/'lr Emmlsslons 4. Explosives 5. Fire
INCIDENT DESCRIPTION
Incident Location/Name \iJ,;,ht cl,el41·•cql ~ I/ 1 c:/,,)/ -~, ,tiu lcle 11 ,, de.
Address Au11e. -1,, 'u (Po Dc.0e !.;021 ' s ' hb-v'\.
City/Town Q;,;, QQ/ v..»oc~ I County Co I <F"-1 bus I Region vJ; Ro
Briefly Describe lnl:0ldent flaV>lcn e. rro r rau5,e.J OJ\ ~, V-l,;" /',·/ I ol( Ct l-e,.,J,,,_,.--_ ,/-,,",_ (
3f:O c," II,~~ re/i4-.;ri-t.../ '5 /J1//p_// • /-le)( "I. -Yt!.. ~ I . ,j' '-u..Je:--..e... / IC,,/ t,()O. s Cc:P1 C'Q' t?f l"; # ...L-/-
,:S C ~I: ,,,,c,/ ~fl s/1, I , ·41 bS I 7tf v.C-r-e_ /osl (3)% for ,110 /,cflc 1,----:J, ) _ So;/ !Ms
beet,,_ e->cac1a£/ a~J ( Co" le, ; " ,..J P"'-, D/aJ,c. "~-{..;I /, ,o t!-r-J,5 /J,;,-v-. / C4-t-t
l f) r'\a h~ t:?J,
" @other 5.,P, LI Date Incident If L.U.S.T .. How Leak I. Tank Gauging 5. lnterstitlal Monitoring
Occurred or Leak Was Detected
Detected 2. Vapor Monitoring 6. Tank Removal
3. GW Monitoring 7. Tightness Test
t -.2:, /-'10 4. Contractor \A/ho tightness tested, removed tank, or Installed leak
detection system.
PERSON REPORTING INCIDENT
Name 'J:::x," C-:Ue~+,waV\
Company/Agency \,J ,.:, • kl-c\,e,..,,,,~J
REPORTED BY: I. Tank owne'ttoperator 2. Government agency
@Facility owner (Non-l.U.S.T.) 5. Other:
(MULTIPLE CHOICES POSSIBLE)
1. !nvestigation complete
2. Continue !nvest1gat1on
Comments E Ca,Jq
CLEANUP LEAD
D.E.M. Regional Contact
Q,· I<. S~;ver-
RECOMMENDED ACTION
G)nltiate/complete cleanup
4. Long~term remedial action
I. Responsible Party u I'\
2. State
I Date ?-'.)/-9o I nme 9 3 fl/It,
I Telephone G55-2 '2&J
3. Private (3rd) party
5. Drilling support~ 7. Confirm leak
6. Issue NOV 8. Monitoring plan
fie z o ,-Jo,.; (C/-,tc /4 S
Date
~-:2-90
GW-61 Revised 5/89 Se,,,,f </c CO 8'-8-90
E
F
G
H
POLLloN INCIDENT/U.s.T. LEAK REPoRIG FORM
MATERIALS INVOLVED
,t," ,,c,(J, k yrt e
'
POLLUTANTS INVOLVED
AMOUNT STORED OR
TANK CAPACITY
AMOUNl LOST AMOUNT RECOVERED .
38D a_c.llc,-s I 9o " "llc,s
'-.J
IMPACT ON SURFACE WATERS
@otentiolly
Distance to Streom(tt)
WATERS AFFECTED I. Yes 2. No S'a'
(yo
Name of Stream stream Closs
Fish Kill I. Yes L; J ,,.,,, fur-._ Crf.ek.. S11/ . \
IMPACT ON DRINKING WATER SUPPLIES
(jfao
No, of Wells No. of Wells
WELLS AFFECTED I. Yes 3. Potentially Af1ec:ed Potentially Affected ----
Population Served Estimated Population SeNed By Aquiter(s) Being Used By Af1ected Wolls Potentially Af1ected Wells l. Wai er Table 2. Confined 3. Bedrock
POTENTIAL SOURCE OF POLLUTION
P~IM8RY SQU~<;;E QE mlM8~J' eQI I UIMI lieE
PQTENTl81 eQI I UIIQN (Select one) (Select one) IQ(;8IIQN fililNl2
~ ·.
l. Intentional dump 13. Well I. Pesticide/herbicide (ijocilit, I. Residential
2. Pit, pond, lagoon 14. Dredge spoil 2. Rodlooctlve·woste 2. Railroad @ndustriol
3. Leak-underground 15. Nonpolnt source 3. Gasoline/diesel 3. Waterway 3. Urban
4. Spray irrigation 4. Heating oil 4. Pipeline 4. Rural
5. land application 5. Other petroleum P(Od. 5. Dumpsite
6. Animal feedlot 6. Sewage/septoge 6. Highway
7. Source unknown 7. Fertilizers 7. Residence
8. Septic tonk 8. Sludge 8. Other
9. Sewer Jlne 9. Solid waste leach9te Confirmed Violation of:
10. Stockpile 10. Metals I. 15 NCAC 2L
11. Landfill 11. Other lnorganlcs Yes No
02),111-surface @ther organics 2. A,1icle 21A ~I
· I Yes No
If other sources, llst corresponding No's. 3. Article 21A Port II 2 J; /? Yes No
If rTlultiple pollutant types. list corresponding No'_s. 4. Federal/state U.S.T. rules 2 5 /2 Yes No
If PIRF previously submitted for Nonprimorv Sources, 11st Incident No's.
Ii , 15, 3832
'. .• POLLUTION INCIDENT/U.S.T. LEAK REPORTING FORM
POTENTIAL SOURCE OWNER-OPERATOR
Potential Source Owner-Operator Wr;d1t C kvM<C q I Telephone 6 5 5 _ 226 3 Company w r ,~ H-C ( ew, ,er.I -Street Address /1c r, e c,, V·O -. ~--;-~·\ ' ,'
City R l I County ( { i State t(c_ Zlp Code 22%(,, 1€ a e / \dooo·· o ()f~; 0 us
U.S.T. ~EGISTERED SOURCE/U.S.l ernMII TYeE OWNERSHIP OPERAIION TYPE 1. YES IN USE 2. NO L N/A {§)NIA 0. N/A 0. N/A
FACILr!Y ID# 2. YES
P'IA 3. NO I. Non-discharge L Municipal I. Public Service
SOURCE PERMITTED 2. Oil terminal 2. Military 2. Agrlcultrural FEDERAL U.S.T. L Yes
DESIGNATION 2.No 3. Landfill 3. Unknown 3. Residential
I L Regulated PERMIT NUMBER 4. Mining @rivate 2. Non-Regulated 4. Educatlonal/Rellglous
SOURCE ON 5. NPDES 5. Federal @ndustrlal STATE U.S.l ERRIS LIST
DESIGNATION L Yes
2. No 6. RCRA 6. County 6. Commercial
1. Commercial
. 2. Non-Commercial ERRIS NUMBER 7. State 7. Mining
REI\SON EOR INCIC!ENI U.S.T. LEAK PREVENTION MEASURES L Transportation Was tank retrofitted with overfill protection?
L Yes
1vA 2. Mechanical failure 2. No
When and by whom? 3. Facility Was tank retrofitted with Interior linl('lg?
L Yes 4. Inventory only 2. No 1/ A When and by whom? @,uman error Was tank retrofitted with cathodic protection?
1.Yes
rJ A 6. Vandalism 2.No
When and by whom? 7. Unknown
ACTIONS TAKEN
lnvestigation:.;
1
0~~.Jent, Cleanup, etc.
/)j · i-'l·IO -
7-7./1-9o II SA// ! tor (<.(c,k/, (Jc. (c /2q:,:; rrJovs. I I ,j e.,x c e~ .5 er< Ci\ --=-•··OSV'rt,-,re '" f/,._ I?,_ n ,.,. ricr t1rfe.J . o 'f /1Q 4c:/Jv
?-31-70 \-J"-Co•·t h,,,_ \ I ,n Ji~;,j ':bell\ ~Ii i\ .. ' '
I . I .5tJ, I .
'x-I -9() /(,'r~ ; /' I "y J ( '\,..,r)c,/ ' . /. I ,rf' 1,,., ✓r-~)-1,,;, r. 'h:i . --j1 (:_ (I <;!), ! -c;cenc
'.J '
J
Circle Appropriate Responses @one Lab Samples T Oken By: I. D.E.M. 2. D.H.S. 3. Responsible Party
Samples Ta ken Include
1. Groundwater 2: Soll 3. Surface Water
K
POLLUTI. INCIDENT/U.S.T. LEAK REPORT!,.
LOCATION OF INCIDENT
7 1/2 Min. 'Jt'ad Name
/./·c Wl -e. ,
Five Min, Quad Numb9r
Draw Sketch of Area
Sketch Should Identify The Following:
I. Pollutant Source(s) 2. Impacted and Threatened Water Supplies
3. Direction of overland Flow
6. North Arrow
4. Significant Recharge and Discharge Features
7. Scale
5. Relative Physical Structures (roads.
buildings, etc.) ·
•
I:
I) . 1--,I , ~8 I I -0 -->-J • J
' §
(\J ~ ' n 0 :5 0
,j)
o-
'j
v
3 j-r V1 [
C J
) 0 c J
CJ
►
:l
\)
\)
,.; -v
J j
r \
t,-
[J
0 0
J
J w
0,
,J -d
I L-
V'
I"
3 r
I I-c
0
C
"'
Vi
!fl , I.J u _)
0 _J r ~ • J
C' _)
0
J <
V s
' I ;--C w :r ' u O 0
-0 , u-;0
l.! u <
0 3 _J
Ill t
; '
Cl
<
~ 0 c 'c! { .JV w -< ' c [) 1--:~ 0
C: If) I--;
!) t 0; \
' I '. T v ' T
.J ( T
: ~
l,j
C -J
1)
('
['_
LL
v~ I-
__D C .
1,J -,!fl
r/ <i" Vl '-' J ,:'1 Cf
,z· v "'· 0 v tl
N,
IJ C vi _D
(7
. I ~ '1', (l
C (, CT
J I: <f <t V
V n
0
VJ
C
0
0
0 I cC
J \) C
-rJ LL ,q-i,
0 p u
I. -
d v ef
'J 0 l,J
f--
t -. cJ u
\ i
"--r ~ ' ,o ' 'a--
/1
I
.
I.
,/
• • STF-400
_ / ~ Page l or 3
Incident Name vJ rt5~~ c"-.,ca -ror-.,./J.4& 5,,,i/ 5122190
Region/Counly w;Qo -Col""'1bv;;;
Groundwater lnciclent File# ____________ _
Ranking Performed by /<..,rk._ /ltc'J~,,,,,U Dale 3'-2-9Q
NORTH CAROLINA
GROUNDWATER CONTAMINATION INCIDENT MANAGEiVIENT SITE PRIORITY RANKING SYSTE~l
I. IMMINENT H.-\ZARD ASSESSMEC:T
A.
B.
Explosion -free product in confined areas or vapor phase product
cleteclecl at or above 20% of the lower explosive limit; aware! 50
points total
Fire -free product subject to ignition in exposed areas such as
surface water impoundments, streams. excavations, etc.: award SO
points total
II. EXPOSURE .-\SSESSMENT
A. Conlarninatecl Drinking \\'aler Supplies
1. Private. domes lie ,•:ater supply well containing substances in con
cenlralions exceeding GA underground water quality standards:
a\\'arcl 10 points per well
2.
3.
4.
Public or insliiut:onal \\'8ler supply well containing substances ir,
concc:nlrations exceeding Class GA underground wnter qualily
sl<.:ndarcls: a\\'arc'. 30 points per well
Exceedanc:es or Class \VS-1 surface water qua lily standards as a
result or groundwater discharge: award 20 points per surface water
body irnpactecl
If a water supply "·ell idenlinecl in items II.A.! ancl 11.A.2 cannot be
replaced by an exisling public water supply source requiring hook-
up only; award additional 10 points per irreplaceable well
13. Thrcac .lo Unconlarninalec\ Drinking Water Supplies
I.
2.
3.
4.
Private, clomestic waler supply well Iocalecl within 1500 fee:t clown
gradient or contan:inanl source: a\vanl 10 points per well
Public or institutional water supply \Veil located within 1 /2 n1ilt
clowngrac\ient or conlarninant. source: mvarcl 15 points per well
r{:1w surfr1ce wale:-int~1kc for public waler supply locat:ed wil'hin l /2
111ile clowngrnclicn: or conlarninanl source: ;:nvard 5 poinls per water
supply system
If any well iclenliecl in ilerns ll.B. l ancl 11.B.2 is localed within 250
feel of conlarninanl source; aware! acldilional 20 points total
C. Vapor Phase E,q)osure
l. Product vapors clereclccl in inhabitable building(s); award 30 points total
[cont.)
Points Awarclecl
0
0
0
0
Q
0
Q
Q
0
0
2,
• •
Proclucl vapors c\clcclccl in other confined areas (uninhubitable build~
ings, sewer lines, ulilily vaults, etc.): award 5 points total
STF-400
Page 2 or 3
5/22/90
Points Aw;irded
0
Ill. CONTAMINA,\T HAZARD ASSESSMENT (chemical groLips are categorized based on tm.i-
city}mobilily and persistancc in the environment). Evaluate lhe most hazardous substances
detected and select onlv one of U1e following:
A. Award 30 points total if contaminants detected are idenlil"ied \\ith any of the
following groups:
B.
C.
1.
2,
3.
4,
5,
6,
~
10.
11.
12.
13.
14,
Aromatic (Benzene) Acids
Aromatic Hydrocarbons (Benzene Derivatives)
Sulfonated Hydrocarbons
Halogenated Hydrocarbons
.-\lkaloids
.-\nil in es
Phenols
.-\ldehydes
Ee tones
Organic Sulfur Compounds (Sulfides, ~lercaplans)
Organornelnllic Compounds
Cyanides
Esters
\lelal Salls, Including Heavy Metals
Aware! 10 points t:olal if conlarninanls detected are identified wilh any or the
fnllo\•:i,1g groups:
1. .-\liphalic (Fatly) Acids
2. Alcohols
3. .-\liphalic Hydrocarbons (Petroleum Deri,·alive)
4. Pyridines
o. Thiocyanicles
6. \linernl and Metal Acids
7. \lineral and Mela! Bases
8. Oxides
9. Sulrides
Awarcl 10 points total ii" conla111inants detected arc idci,tll"iecl with any or lhe
following groups:
l. .-\liphalic Amines and Their Salls
2. Sugars and Cellulose
3. Carbon and Graphite
IV. SOURCE ASSESSMENT
A. Free product thickness or~ 1/4 inch clclccl'ccl on w~1ler table in obserYation or
rnonitori11g well: award 20 points total
. B. Conlamina~ecl Soil (select onlv one answer)
1. ' Soil saturated with product (saturation dctermi11ed by release of free
liquirl upon compaclion or a soil sample by hancl pressure); award 10
points total
(cont.)
3o
0
0
0
lO
2.
• •
Soil exhibiting organic vapor content above 100 ppm as measured by
organic ,·apor or volatile organic clclcclion equipment: a\\'arcl 5 poinls
Lola!
C. Unconlrollecl or Cnabatccl Primary Source {inclucling clurnpsites. stockpiles,
bgodns. land applications, septic tanks, lanclnils, underground and above
groui1d storage tanks. etc.)
1.
2.
Suspeclecl or conf'irn1ed source reinains in active use and continues to
rCceive raw product, waslewaler or solid wµsle: award 20 points per
source
Active use of suspected or conflrn1ed source has been discontinued or
source was caused by a one-Lin1e release of product or waste, however.
source continues to reelease product or conta1ninants into the environ-
ment; a\\'ard 10 points per source
V. ENVIRONMENTAL VUL'.\ERABILITY ASSESSMENT
A
B.
Verlical Contaminant Migralion -Literature or well logs indicate that no conl1n--
ing layer is present above bedrock or above twenty feet below land surface;
award 10 points total
Horizonlal Conlaminanl Migration -Data or observalions indicate that no dis-
charge points or aquifer discontinuities exisl between the source and i'he
nearest downgraclient drinking water supply: a\\'ard 10 points total
C. 1-lyclraulic Gradient Is Ddenninecl by (select onlv one answer):
1.
2.
3.
Calculations based on groundwater level measurernenls: mvard 10
points total
Observation or significant recharge/discharge features in Lhe ,·icinity or
contaminant source and local topographic features: award 5
poinls total
Observation or local topographic features only; award 0 points
D. Existing Ground\\'atcr Quality
1. AnalyUca'. Lesl(s) performed on groundwater sa.mpk(s] obtained from
site cconfi1111 presence of substances in concentrations exceeding Closs
GA underground waler quality standards; award 10 points total
2. Sourcc(s) identified in Section N constitute the only known source(s) of
conlaminalion resulting in exposure or potential exposure iclenlified in
Sect.ion II: award l O points total
STF-400
Page 3 of 3
5/22/90
Points i\wardccl
0
0
to
0
0
Q
{)
0
ID
TOTAL POI\TS J\\VMI.DED ~
·'-'-''--'''--'+' ~.lc_,fc_Lf-',,c"'!r,l-"-::;./!.,) j I----+-'-'/_: 'i £ ;JfV{
Mec~wi·f:~ t, ~·•1. .. ~r .. V,:-".c:r:,·
e_ y ,i
$ /;
I
C ( 1}[, \'-C,<;\•,_. s Ct ( [ G,':)t1"...
rf(,_ f.( f(C,. ~..,a,:. c,_,.., ,,.,,r,l~( :::,
, i I
·' "-·C•·,ll "' ,(( .. ~ (( rr 5-(I') ;he ~' 'd',v•.•s (
~\-~~ ~ ,,
'ij--_""!.t;. '*
~-~•;,;;;;~;,,½~ll-'lf'.Ji~,ttt?J
C
,,f;"'. ,u~liB' :;;.;j•:~ ~~~~i· t'fl:: ..
.;§.~;:;~ H•J,.:;*. <:h.~,~I
ij"V;•". *'•~· ;:,{5§-.
~
"-¥$!, j-~'fi. l;-~f .. l!~~t t>~
·" ,.
l,ir:,:r
,·r-.,.
! );~ ,~·f!··
;i;ll i:'·>.~~: !~~ti~ w~~\•~ ;~14\~-~·;: I~;; ';;cc ;~~?.--'>-· f;j,;;~:~\~~ ~)J:¾)i···). IJ( t~(\£:_:
Wi{f~~\~.-
~'.LJ?:,--:;· t+ ,4,-:.;,~.,
1\ift
!it
~l -r-I' -::,--" 0
--,,;
[/\ <; ,., -:::---:;::, \\
i), "' t C -~ ~ , "' ;:-
o---I§.._ "' ' 'f';-... ~ C ,, t ~ cf--r-. ·, .o ) •C, ::---cc
D .,
' "' ~
.l)
. "
:,. "I :;:--" " ~ "' ' ., ~-~" '?_, 'j;'-7 ~ ..., r
l> -::1c-
-r~
-p ll\ .,.
r
·-+-----+--+---+---J----+---+--1----1----l---+--l-l----+--+-l----l--_ ,'..
.; .-:tr ... --~
~t~~h-.~ ,t, .. ~~V:,:~~~i1/ij8.\.1--~~ .,,_~ .~1,,;,c;..,n .. ~~~'9~;,fi~"',·': ""'"'"'":'!'3~ ,r,.',.--~~·-•·'J I.-· .. .J' '. (>', , •.;:•~ -~ • .~ .-·••:.-'· •• ~ ..-•, ~ i,:,;...-"'·.,.~-1?-~J?.:o.-.. ·-'"; ~--•t-i(,'ij •:~~ bf 1f_ • .i:•t~.~,.-;,:, 'I .~ "'·•t t~r~; ~ : ••, _ ~: , , ,. .; •. , ,,, ~ . .,:,::i •,t~ • -, ~ f.• 1 .i(.;.,,;.'..., •➔n• .,-:,-:.,,..·.1 ••}'i :., :'• :-~,., ,• ., , • :~ ..,_:-, -· r~--·•,1: ·1,·,,. • •:i,M•v· ,..·:.· .·..t,•J,, •• -,';.f~'l,....,,,,,:µ~:,.1.-:,11 ....-.; • ,;.' ,, ... ,.. ·•.-,.,..~l.l)!,,7,;~. -.~'.·.•,. 1.,._,-.~:,("j.-:r>;c~•P'•,:".•.., •~·•· -~ •-· 1i•,:· ·.,: .. >·~--~\:1:·i' J;.; .. ;~---~: :.~:{'t(:T.~f~.{t~~~i~t·•f:i,~ \!~ :.~t:r;· :~r,f1!(1;1;~1:~•i~2 ~t•:;:-~ '.,._ ;; ;i~;~I,•f ti~!'}i"1 •:r/f~i~~:_Pdt~:~~:;;:.""~fff'.(~;fii .,;,;,\-:, 1t'f~\1:•;::::\:•~,.~-~ ' -;:i:ft:, · ..
t}irY:'.}i;:\~ilf il(i0tiii{~¥i:it~ti~~i~/.: ~1I1jj]/i}i~'.~~;ir~~:rtit~t\~~=~t:t~I)i\({:}i};~;~/:/~y·:
f ..:.~--: \f':·,·.' • .... '. •y~ ~~ 11t:.~~-." .. :".;'.~,t,y§.~f-';::.:f,!;1;.I~•~,~~:;:.:-"%::-,"'~~-~~~(?;~ """;.,r,/,_•1 J;!:f.Av1 ;, • ·1,~/~1,' a:.-~{·:;.-J• ' . .-.~,,<,·1. ~!{ ·/,!-> • ,/;j:,: '. ~ { f./.:: _ · ~ >. ,--~ .· ~ · "-;', •.;-:,'. ~::/}1~'~\i~t;]fLl~titfttt~:i~1~tt~~I~iitt((ti~:;}:])·_:~~~r!~t~f~It:,i{f;~;t'.-' ~-:-~::-/:~:' __ ,. ; .. _ :·._ -~:_·/--,-· _::Yb
• •
N.C. Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
Date _Li~ '1 D
Time: 3: So Dam
~m
Telephone Log
Sheet _L_or __ /
Call: Placed B"Rccei vcd D
Rcttimcd D
1 Project \JJ r-·'6, ~ t C ~ lCCi I -f:"o,Mq /J}tyk Sp."// County :_C=..,"e.c\U"'l1:::.2b::..:v=-,,S'-----
T elcphonc: f/19) 655· 2..'.263 2. Conversation with: Oq "1 ~e t.J-'111<1 v\
3. Affiliation: W "'6 h ~ C ~ ;CA /
Ve, b..-
l Q,'( C<!
,,-rro«..J.
v,,_/;
cc: ______________ _
et seq.
_J_G.S. 143-215.1
_.J__G.S. 14&215.75, G.S._----"I ________ _
(
G.S. 143-215.108
~G.S .• 7-83, et seq.
TO: t(k,r,,..,;r
(Name of Violator)
YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED that the undersigned representative of
the North Carolina Division of Environmental Management observed
a violation of North Carolina Environmental Pollution Control
Laws at: ___ --''------------------------------£ I -~ . . .· (/,: /,(_//(7;./r {_ 'c~·R .17,:)//1/ 7 i 1.1:l
(Location of Violation)
on or before
The following facts establish a violation:
t?-0lf:,cc•1f .1✓-r~.1.:,,'11/ ~::.,,sj·JP✓ /it.~.<-✓ .. ~. 1:.:/ 1 1 11;/~~; ..s·. /J~C; ..;.. /J A ,·,, .fJ~\,, ·,-,·/_; ,.,,._/,1,c,:· • .-:..;(~
llt<(;•t2./-~·.r11.?t.:: 7/ll'/fr(. /-;t'_;/1/.:VJMli~·~.;,4~',!;F .,:.'.:t)r.1./11C:Af1/'_q7 '1/~.J) :':_);.:-' .. ,11 ;.~p
/),;./;/; tr··.i/l}.FiTt .,l>,i.)/) ,,(/,;llJ./,.'vl.t· ,;ff"">/fl) ,<fAfl> /<./1.)../ Jj_if;,/,Jff:i; t,');?r''l/.
,;)/)//l 11((ulll!f!../:: ,..,.~--0 t:,:Z.t ;;/:;<i 7/""11_·. /Qt?-· Ji.t✓f·1r'rr'/r·T>r:r./ 1 It;,.-1::IA_J,~--:,~.·
"'!1•, ·f),.:,1/ 1/,\/r·,·/ /.l-:,;~J ..f.l/ ·.//:1 r;··-~,_,..._.,. -· r -• ,, •. r;, · \.· I \ ' · -/ • .-,. /~ II·. ( , ~, ~:;r .· ·, You a'i:e required to cease the"unlawful activity immediately.
The following corrective actions must be taken:
~f",&"'.)(:;yF ,l};t-"'r'·i'·-('i-[!:.: k,5.;•.,:1/:::: /; (j/f,.l(j/! . ..-:( ,• .r1(.~1:.'t.'": :~/..ii/S/i?//'f. __ .. 4/:J,11(';::/..,.:7 ..
J,,·.J .• ::":.~/?//!. ~~A.::~/i./., .tr) ,J/1.,,::.r ;::,-,1.j('F /:../4l'r•tf,~//II. /.11/ ,:~.11_:;_-l;.,,i. Iit..t/.ftJ:;'"
;.::[_)/? r,'":/~_'..f' .~/S/>o•;A/ //:_\)~K'.'1/f'i'/1'\;._/~ l':J?_{}/V} IHI! 1);_:,/~/J-R Tl'L,'f?/,//..-
1']/:.'/'J, r J.(.,'1-l/J ,.(;, i'r1/j,,,.,/]jJ /j,~1 /,;'/A 1/'J~) ~St~'/ I'.,; 1t1d>/ i3[; }P,..C/,~ ( )/(1 /: /,),
A written response must be filed with the Regional Office at the
address below on or before A;J(;[}:o.?r '7 , 19:,,\-.
NOTICE is given that this and any further violations may result
in enforcement actions, including cfvil penalties.
' it" , "" -··1 /-:, j,., /i, ;, j /
/ "" , ,u-: .n ,:-.v.,.'° y· • ,:, ~· , , "
/ t) / ./ l :.· ~-·•;_',·'--:A_,.c.···_;'-c:·'.:..·:'--'' •ce'-'c:-.-,"c'...t"-"'L"'~=c:.·_::~--------
( Date) (Representative's Signature) -----------------------------------------------------------------1, ;/4i()l,'//?/ /~ f'V;ll./,1'1)·•x;;; , hereby certify that I have
personally served a copy of this Notice on:
i :~J;f! j)fT!/..4/ir>/ at vC~~~/(1/./T l~,/2/Jc,t"A1)(',t·/
(Name) (Location)
on ~/ /;;;, / , 19 '/(:, . 1/h t/1~1" ,'./A>--,·>-,.--·-
/( Signature)
Regional Office Address: 7i?:,;~ /1fr.;1(-;f!t5Vi1./!' j/.1.iij
1;.,· I (' 5 · ·· -··-., / ,,,., • r
//.//!' ;£ • .f,l,/\/,/1. / (.'._/'~,.-/' ,J·,' • /_ . (}<;,t_//; •;; -,:.!.,,-' .• .: ,, ,,,.
,,
n.
, • • Nortn Carolina Department of Human Resources
Divis.ion of Health Services
Environmental Epidemiology Branch
Drinking \'later Health Risk Evaluation
General
RECEIVED
M/.IT 2 4 19'.:iU
POLLUTION CONTR.OL BRANCH
LABORATORY NUMBER.--"l')'-=-r;:.-~_/_6 ___ _
··-·-.-·,--·( ·· .. ) Based-:on--"these analytical resul. ts, this ·water 'sh~ciuld':·o,f'6:5n·s iclere,d '··safe'·.-.·a,,,. , •. ,.cc,-.,,,,.··"·'·, .c·
for normal usage.
( ) Chemical analysis did not show any contamination. Water should be resampled if odor or taste persists.
( ) The water should not be used for drinking or cooking purposes, avoid
prolonged bathing/showering.
( ) Basecl on these analytical results, this water is highly contaminated and should not be used for drinking, cooking, or bathing/showering: (✓ The laboratory results are not conclusive, please re sample: /w,~~~
PLEASE INDICATE ON LAB SHEET THAT IT IS A RESAMPLE AND PROVIDE PREVIOUS f SAMPLE NUMBER ( S) .
( \J Comments.: »--,J 0-: J
1 -Iv
for further information, contact Dr. Ken Rudo.
Ep.idemioloyy Branch, [phone].
LJHS T,1)4 (Revised S/89)
Environ~entol Epidemiology Branch
Environmental
•
•
LUi;I-: I Y
OUJ\U /HJ . .fJ/3-3
l /, T . m,~~
+-! :--Oc,
Fl[LO A/\Jt',L YSES
' 7 PI:-~ U O -·c•~=~ ~~ :n:,r_·.
Tcm;;.10 _.,,..,,,,,.,.,· u:-
,\;Jpc:ciran_ceC:/;..·,·;;
LABORA TO,H
ll!J(J t 1"
CO:J l <.:" J ,·
'.~[:HJ ;\L UU.
/--~ ///')
-----Co rl/J. ':.1-~ /~-~1!
ra.; /I
rn \Ill --"·
N.C. IJEl'r or
S1\I.IPLE
D
U ."/Jlt:(
Loi;:111u11 or :;1!(:
PRIORITY
0
PLJFIPOS[:
K ESOURClS
.. -----·
,COl.!PLAliH. COi.1PL! :,:!Ct:, ! t.:c.::·
l'ci"rc·le one)
l_p11rrip; l 1990
(pumping 1ime, air 1ernµ, eic.)
'.IOU u;;II
t•JrUrh!SS (non·c:aio) '.JU:? /() ___ ~ Cd 1;a 1;;, c,m ~ 1 t, rn :;/I
Pt,.,nvl:. J'.'7:.J•.• ~i 'J"J/J
S:.,.,,:1lic: Con..i. 'J~ :.,1.11 .. ;~/t:JII Cnrom,vm:Tot,11 1034
,,,,,;;/I
.43
t:11:, " " G 10 ,01 J'l~/1
1-: T ,-,:1; ,j :i 1; U?!> o.l !'1\)/1 Lo,ac :o~ 1 ,
,('
Chromiw.-n:tH:, ;U:.J'.'
Color:lru,• 1:0 l'l·C,; --------····----
C~d!IH)u {:'{; L... ,Q\ 11";/I -----------
Lab Cornrncnb:
r102 110:J J~ " ,;:.io _-),) u1i;/I :; ": u n, urr1 I 1.: I
f•: l ut~ I " f' c;i;~ Q_/ nl•J /f Zn ZS u,;i /I
I------------
For !Jissoh•eU An.!lp;i~ -:;u:.:nil lillL"ll!ci s;,ir:1:..i!t.: .:ind 1·;ri!e ·01s· in blocl-. Wt1i1c coi:y -l!c>JCL;u~r!L'r:.: hn~ cor;y -Hl·qiun Yellow CO:):,.--LJb
i
--
LA i3 UO
Cn[C1:rn BY
P[VIEWED BY
SUPEFNISOR
OG l It•
C(>_1/'. _ _k:l,~
•
DATE
SAMPLE TVPE: W,~TER
STORET MO
l·ldr,onol Dy GCiFl[J
•
ORG,\NIC Al<ALYTICAL f:'.EPOf;:T
i\i·lAL YSIS RESULTS
• •
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
' Wilmington Regional Office
James C. Martin, Governor
William W. Cobey, Jr, Secretary
. DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEl1ENT
Mr. KiJn Watts
Rt 2, Box lA
Riegelwocxl, North carolina 28456
May 11, 1990
Subject: Analytical Results
Bob Jamieson
Regional Manager
Sampling of Your Domestic Well
Acme
Columbus County
Dear Mr. Watts:
Enclosed is a copy of the analytical results of the sampling of your domestic
well on February 14, 1990. 'Ihe Groundwater section_ has reviewed the analyses and
finds no evidence of =ntamination related to Wright Chemical operations.
Should you have questions or need further information, please feel free to
=ntact me at [phone].
DAT/lfc
Enclosure
=: WiRo
CF
Sincerely,
D.Jrm~li TaJrv
Deborah Taylor
Hydrogeological Technician II
7225 Wrightsville Avenue, Wilmington. 1'\JC 28•+{)]-3696 • ·1ekphonc 919-256-4161 • Fax 919-256-Bm
•
•
,
N.C.
Sl:RJ Al NO.
l A 1. LOilC.
v1sno. 1<111s1on r:o Otl1er ________ _
ROUTINE
If 2.-S PURPOSE, BASEllrJE.
Owner
Loc3.tion or si1e
Descriµtion 01 sampling point
-. ____c--"·--...
COl.1PLAI UT. _CQi.1PU ,\/ JCE, ----·-cc ifCTe one)
LU~-_-. OTHER
' _( ·, ~· ~-s,";c· s..,J'--'-'-"'==c...·c.c· -cc•-=-·~··-----
Ta~ IC ______ _ Samp!inq 1-.-\etnod
LAl30RAT0i1Y -lcf·✓AL YSES
B(;I.J~ :J l 0 m <,1 II
COD r,i,;n J .: ,J ,,, 9 /I
CO:! Lo• :J.J:, r:1c;/1 '--:-:~ /\ Cvl1Jo1•n:,.•.i I c•,.;,;j :.; 1 t, 1,:, c.. I /lOOnd
\ ,· J I ~04 -:.1 I I IJOml ,-'\ Culilv,1:i:r.11 rv:.11 _, I(JC ,,,,,i .z:..:=. ~ ., m9/l
l UI t,, <l II) ,,. l:TU
-. , .,_ '" ,u, -..,,3 un, 15
v· " Al>Jltt11l; lo I>" .;_:, "o c:; mg/I
" .•\ A 1·, JI ,r,,i·, '" :n, u ~ I•~ t. I mg /I
(~ d r tJ (11:J I u <I m911 ' .• ·'· E,ca,~ Qna it: .; .; 0 ( mg /I
;-~ Ar~ur:i~::.JIJI : UU:.' "-I(\ u,;;/1
Cad.Jun u,c,iov .;o:, mg/I >< Cnl Oir•J" 'J•HJ p, fl)<J/I
CIiromium:,,e, lO:J 2 LJQ/1
Color:T1u., '° Pr-Cc
;<, Cy~flltl" 7 2() L ,QI m9;I
lntl Cornments:
GW-~I'. Rcvi!->cd 7/C':.>
F?erriarks ~ , 1 l1D f&'-\ (pumping lime, air lemp, etc.)
-A ..... I .... ii.I I'.!:' .x__ Uiss. Solios 70300 ",f) m,i/1 AO -!Uv"e"t"r011 ug/I
·'\ Fluoride "' A.I mg/I ,,,
·"· Al .\luminum 1 1 05 I.:;:,\ uc /I
, .-. ,,a ,011~ ss; T oia! \JOO 1 cc; m,;,11 6, • Birium 1007 v.;/I ., ~ Haroness (non-carol 902 If\ mo/I _,, ... , / c, Calc•um 9" z. I,, mo/I ·" ~ Pnt1nols nno --~ uo/I '/ Co Caomium 1 02 7 LZ,C\ uC/I
s~ .. ci1ic Cono. " uMnos/cm 1 /. Cn1om1um:Tc1aI 1034 "" c5 uc/I ., / $vii a Id 94:, C:.::, .-, mo/I ,< Co Co"'Per 1042 3,5 u9/I
Sul lid tr "5 mg/J "-'' lfOll 10~5 t'. =o VQ/1
"' Mo1cu1y 7 1 9 00 uQ/I ,,-
-✓ \_ . PoIas5i~·m '" .43 mo1I
./ ,.1c -l.iai;,;n,:s,um '" ?, I mc1I
'•' /,ln -/,I;,n(lanese , IOS~ < 10 u,;; /I
V ::a So<.:ium "' I, , ':> me/I _.,..'
./ ;;11::; " " "0 ,01 m9/I ,·, ~: j /Ji C > e I 10U7 uQ/I :< T ,< N as " 625 O,l mg/I ,_,
, ' Po Laao 1 OS 1 < 16 u<;/ I ,,
' rm, .. 1103 as 11 GJO .),j mc11 s, s~:i1nium 1 I 4 7 "' "i' r, uQ /I ~<, P: lo lal " p 6G5 .n1 mo1I '< le l, nc 1097 ZS uQ/1
For Dissolved Analysis -sula:nit li!1ered snrnple and write: ·01s· in blocf.. While cop,· -Headquarter'..: Fin~-copy -Region Yellow coo;· -Lao
OqjilflOCl'llOlin,;, Pts1,c,o,s
Oro;inoono~onorus Pestic,o,,
Acio HerdiciOe5
Acio E.rractaOle Orr;;;inics
>(" Pwr,;ieilOlt Or.ian,cs {VOA D<Jttte)
1.2 Diororno<iltl1'lflt {EDB)
_/ .• .-;
• •
ORGANIC ANALYTICAL ViPORT
LABl,O. OG116
--..., ,.._
REPORTED 5\'
CHECKED BY
[liTi:REu C\' ~/ ~;_--_; __ _
REVIEWED BV
SUPERYISOR DATE
SAMPLE TYPE: WATER
STORET NO.
AHAL \'SIS RESULTS
COMPOUND
No volelile organic$ delecled by GC/ELCD/PI D.
No volatile organics detected by GCiMS( purged)
lielhanol by GC/FI D
No bese/neutrel or ecid exrrect.eble orgenic~ det.ect.ed b1J GUMS
CONCENTRATION
< 60 rna/1
COUMT Y N.C.
OU AD HO. Bc?P._.,_,_;_, -~! ~'·-· SER J .AL tJO.
LAT. LONG. -r; II 19
DEP/ MENT
/"' . '
OF NATURAL RESOURCES -, LAB NUMBER a .t:Jn I/&,
ATE RECEIVED_9/j!, -fyj!JTime 9.'..3:::i &COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ec'd byw-//:,?:!:{)Bu~
ther '"""' ~
Reoort 10: ARO, FRO, MAO. ARO, WaR0,0~~~ SAMPLE
c;Rou~~~TE
1P(ELQ)J,STrCJ[1Y
ATA ENTRY PRIORITY
WSPO, Kinston FO Other
Sh1J0ed by· Bus,,.--~7~r. Other
COLL[C l(JR(S): 1:-.·.-1:).1-l r--OATE
Cond.9,L.,
Odor 0 0/lf
FIELD ANALYSES
Dfl.: 00 ~•); L Soec.
Temo.10 / 0c
,\ouc,,ranr,eC&o ✓ Taste _____ _
Fi e I 0 Ana I y s I s DI-': ~'P~J__,_~·cu.=¥\ ~g{,..... ____ _
I
LABORATORY ANALYSES
800:, 3 l 0 mQ/1 /'-
coo '"1 IQn :) • tl mQ/1 ,'\
CO\J ,,. JJ '., mQ/1 X
;,: Cnl,l,)rm:1.'' f <>Cal J l 6 16 / 1 00ml )<..
Coli I c,r<'l :~Al l o1al 31~04 / 100rnl :x
X. 10...: ,oe o mg/I
T urb1 ci 1, iti rnu '<
~< OH ~ (1 ~ uni ts
V A.IO al,,,, IY '° (lH •. s "' mg/I ..
\.,'
' A. IO .ii I ni ly ,, oH 8. J "s mQ/1
CHbonate '" mo/I
x: Bicaru1n~1e HO mQ/1 X
:< A.1senic:Tonl 1002 ,:; ii\ "'" ,./-
Carbon dio•ide ,os mQ/J X
•.,· Chi Ori di'! ,-o mQ/1 X
Chromi.,m:He, 1032 UQ/1
Color:lrl>'" 80 P!·Co
D ROUTINE C3J EMERGENCY DATE REPORT
Oescriotion ot sampling point
Samp!ir,o Method --=--~-~---~----------Sample I nterva I ..:;_U:_:1t.,_,/:~~---------~~~.P.• bailer, etc.)
Remarh' :; ~ ,1Y>')p:J (pumping time, air temp, etc.)
Diss. Solids 71)300 mQ/1 AQ -Stiver 1077 ug/1 OrQanochlorine Pes1icid1s
Ftuorlde 9!:<l mQ/1 y ., ,\lllmlnllm 1105 1.:;:/\ UQ/1 0 rQ • no ohos Ph or" s P1s1icid1S
H ardness:T ota I 900 mg/I •• Barium 1007 uQ/1
Hardness (nor -ca,b) 902 mQ/1 y c, Calcium 916 z, I.,, mQ/1 Acid Herdicides
Phenols 327311 UQ/1 ·x: Cd Cadmium 1027 ,: z,t'\ ug/1
Suecillc Cone. :,5 uMhos/cm1 .x Ch r o ml urn: T OIi I 1034 "'c5 IJQ/t '>( Base I Neut, al E1trac1abl1 OrQanlcs
Sllllate 945 mQ/1 X Cu • Copper 1042 "3,5 ug /I Acid Extractable Organics
Sulllde 745 mg/1 ; A FI • Iron 1045 L<:../\ ug/1
HQ • MefCllfY 7 1900 ug/1 )( PurQelble OrQanics (VOA Dottle)
/'\ K • Potassium 937 .43 moll X ~o•. -1-V-~. 1/.·, I', ,-. :, I
X Mg Magnesium 927 7, I mo" '. 2 Oibromoelhane (EOB)
A "". ManQaneu 1055 <I() llQ/1
;"'-, No Sodium 929 1 •• 5 mQ/1 X 4< V\'\O. lc,1.e__ h_._,,J .q
NH3 IS N 6'0 mQ/1 N; Nie k e I 1067 UQ/1
TKN IS N 62S mall X Pb • L eld 105 1 .:::1~ UQ/1 X \-; 'L)'..f\ 1--(",; '"' e
N02 + N03 as N 630 mg/J s, -Selenium 1 14 7 L a,, t-, uo/1 V"<"'9 ¼-.....D·,....,_c,\
P:Total as P 665 mg/I >< Za l inc 109'2 ZS UQ/1. 6e-~ \.--o.. L.~~.t ht_:>_\)~/'.,:-,_ I .
c,·-: c..,r, .. i_:, ; c!S )
' .• r-11CQ QR_v ►\,'<1v..,
~ -~ "' ye.IS R£.PUt< I
•
•
,• Cyanide ''° rn<;i/1 . .EJVi:. REC 0
Lab Cornmcnls:
GW-.';4 Revi"ed 7/BO For Dissolved Analysis -sui,~it filtered sample and
White copy -Headquarters Pink copy -Region
write ·01s· in block
Yellow copy -Lab
LAB NO.
REPORTED BY
CHECKED BY
REVIEWED BY
SUPERVISOR
SAMPLE TYPE:
STORIT NO.
l . , .
I
• • ORGANIC ANALYTICAL REPORT
06116
~ l:C
<i9)1,/\
I
z9JJLl
'Rel( DATE 3pg/90
WATER
ANAL VSIS RESULTS
COMPOUND
No vollltile organics detected by GC/ELCD/PID.
No vollltile organics detected by GC/MS( purged)
Methanol by GC/fl D
ENTERED BY
CHECKED BY
No !me/neutral or &Cid extractable organics detected by GC/MS
T:;A
\)$
CONCENTRATION
< 60 mg/1
• •
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
Wilmington Regional Office
James C. Martin, Governor
William W. Cobey, Jr, Secretary
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAG™ENT
Bob Jamieson ·
Regional Manager•
Ms. Marian DJncan, Director
Envirorunental Health Section
COlumbus County Heal th [eparbnent
P. 0. Box 810
Whiteville, North carolina 28472
Dear Ms. DJncan:
May 11, 1990
Subject: Analytical Results
Blake and Watts Domestic Wells
Acme
COlumbus County
Enclosed for your review are the analytical results from the February 14, 1990
sampling of the Tony· Blake and Kim Watts domestic wells in Acme, in COlumbus
county. These residents live in the vicinity of Wright Chemical and requested that
their water be sampled. As a result, Deborah Taylor, with the Division of
Envirorunental Management sampled the two wells for a standard complete, standard
pollution, and organics analysis.
At present, the analyses do not suggest any correlation betw~ contaminants
and the Wright Chemical Plant. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate-
to call me at [phone].
DAT/lfc
Enclosure
cc: WiRO
CF
Sincerely,
{JJJrri&-~ A 0~~
Deborah A. Taylor
Hydrogeological Technician II
7125 Wrightsville Avcriue, Wi!min1;1on, NC. 28-\03-36% • Telephone 91~J-25tAl61 • Fax 91~1-256-8572
• •
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
GROUNDWATER SECTION
April 19, 1990
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: Environmental Regional Supervisors
FROM: Bill Jeter
SUBJECT: Toxicological Evaluation of Analytical Results
of Private Water Supply Wells
Attached are copies of analysis reports of samples
collected by the Division of Environmental Management from
drinking water wells and evaluation forms which have been
prepared by Dr. Ted Taylor, Toxicologist, of the
Environmental Epidemiology Section.
Information presented in the evaluation forms should be
transmitted to the well owner. The well owners should
direct their questions concerning the evaluation to the
Environmental Epidemiology Section at the telephone number
given at the bottom of the form.
If you have questions or need additional information,
please let me know.
Attachments
cc: Linda Sewall
tej
• ii •
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
Wilmington Regional Office
James G. Martin, Governor
William W Cobey, Jr., Secretary
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
Mrs. Tony Blake
Rt. 2, Box 58
Riegelwood, North carolina 28456
April 12, 1990
Bob Jamieson
Regional Manager
SUbject: Sampling of Your Domestic Well
Tony Blake Residence
Acme
Columbus County
Dear Mrs. Blake:
Enclosed is a copy of the results of the sampling of your domestic well.
These results indicate that your well your well has not been :illlpacted by its close
proximity to the Wright Chemical Plant.
If you have any questions, please do not hes_itate to call me at [phone].
DAT/lfc
Enclosure
cc: WiRo
Deborah Taylor
Hydrological Technician II
7225 WrightsVille Avenue, Wilmington, N.C. 28403-3696 • Telephone [phone] • Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer
•
•
•
COIJIHY
OU.-\ D f-lO.
~-\ ' LAT.
:Y. ~y t, SERI Ml
··1 LONG
N.C.
_,..-__
DU .TMENT
_,....,_
OF NATURAL RESOURCES / LAB NUMBER 8 {)G I 15:
NO.
7-~ ', a 's ! I'-
DATE RECEIVEric?J;Shd T;me '9:30
Rec'd by:~ From: Bu~
& COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DEM
Report to. ARO, FRO. MRO, ARO, WaRO(Wi!:!_9,1 GWUNDWATER FIELD/LAB FO~C ~her 1vHJ\lNPJl&Efdrl&IOur_ ... A ENTRY BY !'A: CK:'t:55 V,'SRO, Kinston FO 0 I her ________ _
Shipped by: Sus, ~)Other _______ _
1-iPR i , 1ocu +,I D ROUTINE ~ EMERGENCY ~1:1 DATE AEPORTEO: __ L~i~-1~2-·~S~◊~-----
COLLECTOR(SJ: C,TQL /,,, DATE :;-JLJ =40 Tlt.iE
FIELD ANALYSES
or:400 S,S Soec.
Temp. 10 -------0 c
Apnearance c),0-At"': Taste+------Samplina Method
.9en,arks
I.US~. OTHER _____ _
,.-,n fl 1990
t,/eJ\ iS 3Q-yof:t (pumping time, air temp, 1lc1.')
LABORATORY ANALYSES
8005 "' molt
coo ><,c,n 3 4 0 mg/I
COD CO• "' mg/I
IX Coli!orm:~f Fecal J1616L 1100ml
',--< Co.lit,.rrn:Mr Total 31504,.:::: 1100ml
•,.,.-TOC ; ;', hi\{) "-5 mq/1
T urb i di ty " rnu
:< '" 4 G' "i,R un, !5
\ .. ,o, l~al in, ty 10 pH .. , .. o I mg/I
\ Alkollin,ty " '" •• 3 415L mg/I
Carbon,He '" "-rno/1 x Blcar1..ona to «o Iii moll
'< Arseni1::To1al 1002 L'.Lt\ "'" Carbon ctio,lae 405 mg/I
--<_ Chlori,le 940 /Z. m,;i/1
Chromium:He, 1032 ug /I
Color:True 80 Pt•Co
y ., Cyanl<1e 720 L,()/ mg/I
Lab Comments:
GW·5~ Rr:vi~ed 7/85
y Diss. Solids 70300 71. m,;i/1 AQ -Silver 1077 <JQ/1
IY Fluoride 951 "'0,/ mg/I X Al -,\lumlnum 1105 /,,/" UQ/J
) Hardness:Totat 900 ?fi mg/I Ba· Barium ·1001 UQ/1 > Hardness (non·carb) ,o, Z.7 mg/I IX c, • Catclum 916 '1 ,9 mg/I
> Phenols 32730 5 ug/1 X Cd -Cadmium 1 02 7 .:z.(') ug/1
Soecl!ic Cond. " uMhos/cm1 X Chromium:Total 103-4 L 7."i ug/1
X Sullate 945 17 mg/I y Cu • Copper 1042 II UQ/1
Sulfide 745 mg/I X Fe • Iron \045 uri ug/1
Hg · Mercury 7 1900 ug/1
/\ K • Potassium 93 7 ,85 m,;i/1 ,, Mg -Magnesium 927 4.Z mQ.'I
)< Mn • Man9anese 1055 'JO ug/1
> No Sodium 929 ~.z. mg/I
y· NH3 as N "0 ,DI mg/l Ni • Nick el 1067 ug/1
I, TKN as N '" /\In mg/I X Pb • Lead 1051 L/(\ ug/1
) N02 1' N03 as N 630 1,f\ mg/1 s, • Selenium 11-4 7 L Ci,() ug/1
I" P;Total a, P 665 , 07 mg/I Iv z, • Zinc 1092 -~'1 ug/1.
For Dissolvec Analysis· suLmit tillered sample and write ·01s• in block
White copy -Headquarters Pink copy -Region Yellow copy • Lab
t;RQlJ u . \ -" -
Organochlorlnpi A.:s£4~•'"i, IW
Organoohosphorus Pes1iclde1
Acid H1rdicldes
X Base / Neulrat E•lract.rbJ1 Org1nic1
Acid Exlrec1able Org,nics
IV Pur,;ieabl1 Organics (VOA bottle)
X \;-~:-A--. ,.,·, ,_-1 -i-,.,_ ,, ~ I
''' • Oibromoe1hene {EOB)
I>< =r-:, _,..," LDL
uyr--,'L,
.A (i-, ' V L\ -" I 1, <,
,)
r,' " r-... (, \.._
. ( h"-s" ~--,vo-:h, (\ \ 0¥C..Oi) ,,
C ,.. 11 -r-rAr-,, ,,..,,. n,.,,--;,\,''ir·c
ANALYSIS REPORT
LAB NO.
REPORTED B't'
CHECKED BY
REVIEWED BY
SUPERVISOR
SAMPLE TYPE:
STORET NO.
• •
ODCl>NIC ANALVTICAL PEPOPT
0G 115
l:rl,5;;;? ENTERED B'r' rA
7l'<Y'I CHECKED BY Qs
i'rlJ I
DATE y/ f&, /qo '7<£K II
WATER
ANALYSIS RES UL TS
COMPOUND CONCENTRATION
NO VOLATILE ORGANICS DETECTED BY GC/ELCD/PID.
METHANOL BY DIRECT AQUEOUS ON GC/FID. NOT PETf:<.TE/)(60 HG/L
NO VOLATILE ORGANICS DETECTED BY GC/HS PURGED SAMPLE
NO BASE/NEUTRAL OR ACID EXTRACTABLE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
DETECTED BY GC/HS.
Samples collected and GW-54
Lab Only Lab No.
Rel.
Rel.
Method of Shipment:
Security Tyµ8 and Condition:
Lab No. o. From Throu h Containers
I
I
I
GW-63
Location
(,J,.. t(
Rec. by
Rec. by
Date
Br.Oken b1 · 0'p en by:,·
Origi I ent with shipment Copy retained by collector
Time No. of
Containers
(
I
I
2/86
~ivision of Environmental .nagement
GROUNDWATER SECTION
CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD
~
RECEIVED
FEB 1 9 19~,
Incident No. _____ _
Samples collected and GW-54 forms completed by: _...1.D=i-«A'-'"-"'cJ=-"-'------'-l"a,/cv'""?I'=-=-------
Lab Only Quad Lab No. No.
Re I.
Re I.
Method of Shipment: C·
Security Type and Condition:
Lab No. o.
From Throu h Containers
Location
Rec. by
Rec. by
No. of
Date Time Containers
Broken b
Open by:
I
I
I
.Division of Environmentalaanagement
GROUNDWATER SE"c';TION -·
CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD
Incident No. ______ _
Samples collected and GW-54 forms completed by:
Lab Only Quad Lab No. No. ·ro ........ c:1 \ec k ~ Location ( \ "'\ Date Time
Ct-·:,4 L, /' ,
·-{-fn,n (J1,<.l\"1(k1-",,../. o/-f-7->K ti.? ... a lz ... t·ru· rJ•l'-1-fo ro; ,s
' '
.,
Relinquished b y(S i g nature):. Received by(Signature):
Rel.
Rel.
Re I.
Method of Shipment:
Security Type and Condition:
Lab No .. I\JO.
From Throunh Containers
I
GW-63
Rec. by
Rec. by
Rec. by
.
Seal by: Broken by: -
Lock by: Open by:
LAB USE ONLY
Analysis Relinquished by Received by
Note: Original sent with shipment
Copy retained by collector
No. of
Containers
( (/
Date/Time
I
I
.-
I
I
Date I Time
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
2/86
;
./
.. • Division of Environmentalaanagement
GROUNDWATER SE"!!"TION
CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD
' ' t F o r I n vest i g a ti o n o f -"''-'-'·eel 1'-':""-:"-I·, ~.:..! -'''-'-''"-1'_,_, 'c.:·•_,_•'--·· '""'·-'-' _________ _ Incident No. ______ _
I 1 • -t Samples collected and GW-54 forms completed by: _ __,l_,,vc.,,..,l.,_.s:...,>e,r~c,.',;__''-'111,,~~,:,·L,;-,_,J==------v
Lab Only
Lab No. Quad
No.
Re) nqu.ished by(Signature):.
·I i --j1 1 :i ,_t. t,,..r--..,, /,., ?(D t. ;-,
-0 Rel.
Rel.
Re I.
Method of Shipment:
Location Date
Received by(Signature):
Rec. by
Rec. by
Rec. by
S I b /· ~ . : / /.,
Time
11 ', z.5
No. of
Containers
Date/Time
I
I
I
I
ea y: -"" "~,~,,,_,,,-,
Security Type and Condition: Lock by: ··tr,;-:,~~.,.l,_. ..... , _/ Broken by: _______ _
Open by:
Lab No ..
From Throu □ h
GW-63
NO.
Containers Analysis Relinquished by Received by
Note: Original sent with shipment
.. Copy retained by collector
Date I Time
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
2/86
SERI AL NO.
couI,ny , Co/ urn l, J·<:.,
QUAD NQ_!=-34. b
LAT.3-J)9}:J LONG. 7?, JI 2_\s \\
\J.
WSRO, Kinston .FO
Shipped by: Bus, ~ Oth~r
COLLECTOR(SJ: 0,Ta_,_____ lo ✓
I
FIELD ANALYSES >•<'-' .\-~ .,,,1 5 S . 1.>_:;.::--
pH 400 ' Spec. Co_.Q.d,•g 4~--at
•I .
Tem.P.1o ------0 c Odor }~or1.e_
/
Appearance C J,c:.LA.,.-Taste+-------
Field Analysis By: tO:-r11__, .--Lev u
LABORATORY ANALYSES
8005 310 mg/I X
COD High 340 mg/I X
COD Low 335 mg/I )(
X Co)i!orrn:MF Fecal 31616 1100ml X
'x. Cotifurrn:MF Total 31504 /100ml X
X TOG 080 mg/I
Turbidity 76 rnu ')(
'x. pH 403 uni ts
)( Alkalinity to pH 4.5'-410---· mg/I
X Alkalinity to pH 8. 3 4 15 ·' mgfl• -· ,
carbonate 445 · mg/I
X Bicart .. onate 440 mg/I 'X
'X Arsanic:Total 1002 ug/J )(
Carbon dioxide 405 mg/I X
')(_ Chloride-940 mg/I )(
Chromium;Hex 1032 ug/1
N.C. DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES
& COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DEM
GROUNDWATER
.SAMPLE
D ROUTINE
FIELD/LAB FORM
PRIORITY
~ EMERGENCY
CD
LAB NUMBER 8
DATE RECEIVED-----Time ____ _
Rec'd by: From: Bus-Courier
Other ________________ _
DATA ENTRY BY: _____ CK: ___ _
DATE REPORTED: __________ _
TIME /0; ( ~ PURPOSE: BASELINE, COMPL~COMPLIANCE, 1.us·:, OTHER--------rCi"rcTe o·neJ
Owner lo V'l.1...1
Loe a ti on or st te
Description of sampling point on
Sar:7plinq Method
Rernarks
--~~~~~~-~---~-----------Sample I nterva I ______________ _
~,)bailer, etc".)
(pumping time, air temp, etc.)
-
Diss. Solids 70300 mg/t Ag -Silver 1077 ug/1 Organochlorine Pesticides
Fluoride 951 mgfl X Al -,\luminum 1105 ug/1 Organophosphorus Pesticides
Hardness:Total 900 mg/I Ba -Barium ·1001 ug/I
Hardness (non-carb) 902 mg/I >( c, -Calcium 916 mg/I Acid Herdicides
Phenols 32730 ug/1 X Cd -Cadmium 1027 ug/1
Specilic Cond. 95 uMhos/cm2 X Chromium:Total 1034----ug/1 )( Base / Neutral Extractable Organics
SUITate 945 mg/I x Co -Copper 1042 ug/1 Acid Extrac1able Organics .
Sultide 745 mg/I x_ Fa -Iron 1045 ug/1
Hg -Mercury 71900 ug/1.., • '>( Purgeable Organics {VOA bollle)
X ' ' K -Potassium 937 mg/t· X \JOA· -v>"-d--hcu,o /
-· ---...... X Mg -Magnesium 927 mg.II 1,2 -Dibromoethane {EOB)
'----· -X Mn -Manganese 1055 ug/1
X Na Sodium 929 mg/I X \:: 0 r:,_..r, A L D 'L -
NH3 as N 610 mg/I Ni -Nickel 1067 ug/1 H yr,'C
TKN as N 625 mg/I X Pb Lead 1051 ug/1 X (\-1 ' y A ...r. I r-,,
N02 1" N03 as N 630 mg/I s, -Selenium I 14 7 ug/1 (..>-\<"\ rt A r----n\.....
P:Total as P 665 mg/I V Zo -Zinc 1092 ug/1-' l bi>.Se l"\Vd-v"-. l CIC.<!li} .. -
•
i· j
Color:True 80 Pt-Co
X Cyanide 720 mg/I -_(
Lab Comments:
'
---------------1'·-' -------------~·-,-~--------,--=c-=-,-,---,-~~----------------GW-54 Revised 7/85 For Dissolved Analysis -sui,mit filtered sample and write ·01s· in block ! White copy -Headquarters Pink copy -Region Yellow copy -Lab
COlJIHY N.C. DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES LAB NUMBER 8 ___________ _
QUAD NO. a:--"3</, b
LAT_ "j.\ I I I 3
SERI AL NO.
LONG. 7'? II Z.'6
Report to: ARO, FRO, MAO, ARO,
\
waRo:~WiRo?
;
WSAO, Kinston FO 0 ther ------'--
·\ Shipped by: Bus, C~urie;) Other ______ _
COLLECTOR(S): c,-b lo, DATE[/~ 14-10
I
FIELD ANALYSES Owner
& COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DEM
GROUNDWATER FIELD/LAB FORM
SAMPLE PRIORITY
□ ROUTINE [Si EMERGENCY
TIME PURPOSE: BASELINE,
C) DATE RECEIVED-----
Rec'd by: ___ _
Time ____ _
From: Bus-Courier
Other-----------------
DATA ENTRY BY: _____ CK: ___ _
DATE REPORTED: __________ _
1.us·.-, OTHER ----------~ C~6_LN.T.,-COMPLI ANGE,
(circle one)
l
I \ • ~ -• J I• )
S 5· '.::.---p1-1400 1 Spec. Cojld:-94 --at
T -----oc Od r "l e
---'-"-·-' ___,_-1_..0==P,,__,l---"'t:t'-'-k,,___-e. ____ ~----____ -~~----,-"---,--'
c+r: ~Ps 1'1120 .--. .,.,-'\ i-, ~~ f--,.,--,,, 1,01,<.,tc.4 (!1,9.,,:,4•, Au,·:-•·-\
--5 c~ 1 , . -\ " ~ .
1cj"' 0. I," 1• _ ·-.,, Description of sampling point ,., c ~....,.
Location or site
emp. 10 ____ or-----~--
Appearance C Jt-<c.LV-Taste+-------c --I Field Analysis By: ,.J. \ct.t-,.\.,tif,_.
J
LABORATORY ANALYSES
B005 3 1 0 mg/I X
COD High 340 mg/I X
COO Low 335 mg/I x_
X Colitorm:MF Fecal 31616 1100ml X
')( Colif<:..rm:Mr Total 31504 1100ml X.
X. 10c r.ao mg/I
Turbidily 76 /HU X
'><' pH 403 uni ts
y Alkalinity to pH 4,5 410 mg/I
'\ Alkalinity to pH 8. 3 4 15 mg/I
Carbonate 445 mg/I
'< Bican,onate 440 mg/I 'x
',( Arsenlc:l'otal 1002 ug/1 '>(
Carbon dioxide 405 mg/I X.
-)( Chloride 940 mg/I ',(
Chromium:Hex 1032 ug/1
Color:True 80 Pt-Co
X Cyanide 720 mg/I
Lab Comments:
Samplin9 Method
Diss. Solids 70300
Fluoride 951
Hardness;Total 900
Hardness (non-carb) 902
Phenols 32730
Specilic Cond. 95
Sulfate 945
Sul!ide 745
NH3 as N "0
TKN as N 625
N02 -t N03 as N 630
P:Total as P 665
----...
~,)bailer, etc·.)
Sample Interval ______________ _
(pumping time, air temp, etc.)
mg/I Ag -Silver 1077 ug/I Organochlorine Pesticides
mg/I x.. Al -.\luminum 1105 ug/1 Organophosphorus Pesticides
mg/I Ba -Barium ·1 007 ug/I
mg/I X c, -Calcium 916 mg/I Acid Herdicides
ug/I )( Cd -Cadmium 1027 ug/I
uMhos/cm2 X Chromium:Total 1034 ug/1 X ease / Neutral Extractable Organics
mg/I x Cu -Copper 1042 ug/1 Acid Extrac1abte Organics
mg/I x.· Fe -lron 1045 ug/I
Hg Mercury 71900 ug/1 X Purgeable Organics (VOA bottle)
X K -Potassium 937 mg/I X \JvA: -,,,,+h.,r-o/
x Mg -Magnesium 927 mg/I 1,2 -Dibromoethane (EOB)
X Mn -Manganese 1055 ug/I
X. Na -Soo,um 929 mg/I ,x I C)b. .'1A L h"t -
mg/I NI -Nickel 1067 ug/1 1-1 Yr, 'L
mg/I X Pb -Lead 1 05 1 ug/I )'-, n 1\ '>( ~.-,7 I ,---. )
mg/I s, -Selenium I 14 7 ug/1 ;.r, <:" T 1-1 A 1---.r· \-
mg/I V z, -Zinc 1092 ug/I '-l b,\:'>e V\ v e+v "-I O;\..,{!'_f_)l
GW-54 Revh,ed 7/85 For Dissolved Analysis -sui.,mit filtered sample and write ·01s· in block
While copy -Headquarters Pink copy -Region Yellow copy -Lab
I
COUl·JTY
QUAD NQ_.88-3~\/
LAT. 'I "c.c,,iQ"
3LjZOoS
SERI AL NO.
LONG.
N.C. DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES LAB NUMBER 8
DATE RECEIVED ____ _ Time
Rec'd by: From: Bus~Courier
Report to: ARO, FRO, MAO, ARO, WaRO,(.Wi'RLi)
& COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DEM
GROUNDWATER FIELD/LAB FORM
SAMPLE PRIORITY
Other-------------·~'"'-~-----
DATA ENTRY BY: _____ CK: ___ _
WSRO, Kinston FO Other D ROUTINE 0 EMERGENCY DATE REPORTED: _______ ~---
Sh;pped by: Bus,<fourrj) Other
COLLECTOR[S): OTr., = u DATE i-,ti-qCTtME ftA,•_1.,<;
0---'
PURPOSE: BASEL I NE, ~"6MPL~OMPLt ANCE, r.us·.
tclrCle one)
OTHER
FIELD ANALYSES /
pH 400 ~?: Spec. Cond.94 __ at 2s0c
Temp.10 r / 0 c Odor-"-":,, n/lP
AppearanceC./Pn :/ Taste ______ _
Field Analysi~s By: ~~-.,...,L\n/
I
LABORATORY ANALYSES
8OD5310 mg/I X
COD High 340 mg/I X
COO low 335 mg/I X
X Coli1orm:MF fecal 31616 1100ml ><
)< Coli!c.rm:Mf Total 31504 /100ml X
X TOC 080 mg/I
Turbidity 76 /HU X
)( pH 403 uni ts
>< Alkalinity to pH 4.5 4 1 0 mg/I
X Alkalinity to pH 8. 3 4 15 mg/I
Carbonate 445 mg/I
X Bican.ona1e 440 mg/I X
X Arsenic:Total 1002 ug/1 x
Carbon dioxide 405 mg/I X
X Chloride 940 mg/I X
Chromium:Hex 1032 ug/1
Owner \--<;w, /)
Loe a ti on or site _o_«~_s_~~~\ ~<t.~I ~CZ~~"~· ,-'.r,,_,,n,~"~)f~-~I ""'~·=1~,_:h1:= . _J_0_, .-,;1, 1 ( L <l,wL, r ~
Description of sampling point <Oi.-:,.,.,-f-0~ /),11/V'\r"'l h n\J-Se
Sampling Method
Remarks
/\ l l v-.n. fl'J
Diss. Solids 70300
Fluoride 951
Hardness:Total 900
Hardness (non-carb) 902
Phenols 32730
Speci1ic Cond. 95 .. '
Sulfate 945
Sul1ide 745
NH3 as N 610
TKN as N 625
N02 1" N03 as N 630
P:Total as P 665
I • I
--~~~~~~~--~~-----------Sample I nterva I ('pump~ bailer, etc·.)
c., (pumping time, air temp, et\)
mg/I Ag -Silver 1077 ug/I Organochlorine Pesticides
mg/I X Al -,\luminum 1105 ug/I Organophosphorus Pesticides
mg/J Ba -Barium 1007 ug/I
mg/I X c, -Calcium 916 mg/I Acid Herdicides
ug/I x Cd -Cadmium rn21-ug/I
uMhos/cm2 X Chromium:To1al 1034 ug/I '>( Base / Neutral Extractable Organics
mg/J X Cu -Coooer 104 2 ug/I Acid Exlractable Organics
mg/I X f'e -Iron 1045 ug/I
Hg -Mercury 71900 ug/I )(" Purgeable Organics (VOA bottte)
X K -Potassium 937 mg/I X, "10/\ -\"'l,e_+ht.\. ho I
X Mg -Magnesium 927 mO,I 1,2 -Oibromoelhane (EDB)
X Mn -Manganese 1055 ug/I
X N, -Sodium 929 mg/J X +-o, '"'"" \de.. V\~d -e.
mg/I Ni Ni C kel 1067 ug/1 '
mg/I X " -lead 1051 ug/1 )( h li?.:x.u \""' ' '" e... mg/J s, -Selenium 1 14 7 ug/1 """e._\--\,.., "' C, \
mg/I X' z, -Zinc 1092 ug/1 ( 6e-c. \,o,_ s ._ / re v--1,,"' I -O<")"'-n,c¾_) -
•
•
Color:True 80 Pl-Co -------
X Cyanide 720 mg/I
Lab Comments:
For Dissolved Analysis -suL:nit filtered sample and write ·01s· in block
White copy -Headquarters Pink copy -Region Yellow copy -Lab
.,-·
.
I
COUfHY N.C. DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES LAB NUMBER 8
QUAD MO . ./3S-:;cJ.1/ SERI AL NO.
LAT. LONG. ~//19
342005
Report to: ARO. FRO, MRO, ARO, WaRO,<.._W-rifo')
WSRO, Kinston FO 0 ther ________ _
Shipped by: Bus, CC>'~~ Other _______ _
I
COLLECTOR (SJ : _,L"'")-'-"-'1,_,,_, -""-"'""-"----<J
DATE
Owner
& COMMUNITY _DEVELOPMENT
DEM
GROUNDWATER FIELD/LAB FORM
SAMPLE PRIORITY
D ROUTINE 0 EMERGENCY
DATE RECEIVED-----Time
Rec'd by: _____ From: Bus-Courier
Other-------------~~~;_' ____ _
DATA ENTRY BY: _____ CK: ___ _
DATE REPORTED: _______ ~------~ .... PURPOSE: BAS ELI NE, COMPLAINT ,_COM PL I ANGE,
----ccirCfe one)
,_us·:, OTHER
~~s ~ FIELD ANALYSES
011 400 ~ :Z Spec.
Temp.10 • ./ 0 c
Appearance<' /Pl".1 V
Loe a ti on or site _o_+_~ __ ,:,_A. __ l~'l.~1~<2:~-~·--,~J;~L~X_._l_,_l~\.~L~L~_.....,~•--b="1'7~ _L,0. a--3 ( i,cA,l-l "'-\::' •
' ~11 ...... .,-;r") h0\.··,e:::: -'-"--'-'--'---'-"-'-~,c-"-="-c"'--'-'-"--"---'-'~------------------Oescri pti on of sampling point ;._ _! I '-rr '.>,;
Taste ______ _ --~~~--~---~----------Sample I nterva I _u_,.~/:~----------Sampliru) Method (Pump) bailer, etc·.)
Fie t d Ana I y s i s By: _';)=·~--''---'-"-'-'~--\~_,_( _____ _
, ___
Remarks
,j (pumping time, air temp, etc.)
LABORATORY ANALYSES
B0D5 3 10 mg/I
COD High 340 mg/I
COD Low 335 mg/J
)( Colitorm:MF Fecal 31616 1100ml
)( Coli!vr!f!:Mr Total 31504 1100ml
X TOG '>80 mg/l
Turbidily 76 \ tHU
X pH 403 uni ts
X Alkalinity to pH 4 .5 4 I 0 mg/I
;( Alkalinity to pH 8.3 4 15 mg/I
Carbonate 445 mg/I
)( Bican,onate 440 mg/I
X Atsenic;Total 1002 ug/1
Carbon dio~ide 405 mg/I
X Chloride 940 mg/J
Chromium:He~ 1032 ug/1
Color;True 80 Pt-Co
X Cyanide 720 mg/I
\ Lab Comments:
GW-54 Revi~ed 7 /85
' -' ?,._:, \V), .,,~-te c..,
:"-Diss. Solids 70300 mg/I Ag -Silver 1077 ug/1
X Fluoride 951 mg/I X Al .\luminum 1105 ug/1
X Hardness;Total 900 mg/I •• -Barium ·1001 ug/J
X Hardness (non-carb) 902 mg/I X c, -Calcium 916 mg/I
X Phenols 32730 ug/1 x Cd -Cadmium 1027 ug/1
Specific Cond. 95 uMhos/cm2 >< Chromium;Total 1034 ug/1
X Sulfate 945 mg/I X Cu -Copper 104 2 ug/1
Sulfide 745 mg/I .x Fa -Iron 1045 ug/1
Hg Mercury 71900 ug/1 .x K -Potassium 937 mg/I
,)( Mg -Magnesium 927 moJI
)< Mn -Manganese 1055 ug/1
X Na -Sodium 929 mg/J
),( ""' as N 610 mg/I Ni -Nickel 106 7 ug/1
y: TKN as N 625 mg/I X Pb Lead 1 05 1 ug/1
X N02 -t-N03 as N 6'0 mg/I s, Selenium I 14 7 ug/1
X P;Total as P 665 mg/I '< Zo -Zinc 1092 ug/1-
For Dissolved Analysis -suLmit filtered sample and write ·01s· in block
White copy -Headquarters Pink copy ~ Region Yellow copy -Lab
\
Organochlorine Pesticides
Organophosphorus Pes1icides
Acid Herdicides
X Base / Neuual Extractable Organics
Acid Ex1ractable Organics
\: Purgeable Organics (VOA bottle)
'<., "10 l\ -iY,\::i-h,· no I
1,2 -Otbromoe1hane {EDB)
X {-,_,, l\,O \, \,._ \ I -J -e.
'
X \-\'<:),..(\\\-".\ ,, e_ -
\\""\Q_ \\""\~\'""-L--\
\ .ic-"-\l<-\·-.,c /11.e.\...'"\""'" I
•_),J~O..n\l~
-
-
•
• •
'~o "''--/ Bl"'--\.;:R Co=p)..o..i...,...1_+:...:.·-------------~--
K-\-'2 60" S'b
·,'
______ _..:,,::ic,=-=-i\._='"'="'-'>1"(-E.,=\ l,-7 (,,'-""'5'-""S_--';,,.,_9.J_'---'~=---------------
t(, 'Y:) NA++-2 055 -d:1 I (p :B,:t_'2..-_~o'i I A D.e.c5[e.!,9.C/C)_J_, __ ,
-:i.i q54,
I
, I
I
t '.
''
I 11
''
I
''
I:
11 •
'I
•
STATE OF NORI'H CAROLINA
OJUNTY OF CQUJMBUS
DI THE MATTER OF THE ) WRIGHT CDRroRATION )
CQNCERNDIG THE VIOIATION OF )
THE UNDERGROOND WATER (;UALITY)
STANDI\Rffi ocaJRRING ) AT INCIDENT NUMBERS 14, 15,
3832, AND AT THE SITE OF THE
SULFURIC ACID SPILL.
)
)
)
BEFORE THE NORI'H CAROLINA
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
o::MMISSION
SPECIAL ORDER BY CONSENT
f11C GW # -------
DRAFT
SUBJECT TO REVISION
NO. I
DATE O 4--() "'· -C1 0
BY \-··)._ c::.:: -:Z
This SPECIAL ORDER BY mNSENT (SOC) is made and entered into pursuant to North carolina General statute 143-215.2, by and between Wright Corporation, hereinafter refe=ed to as the CXlMPANY, and the Environmental Management Commission, agency of the state of North carolina, hereinafter known as the o::MMISSION.
Wl'INESSEIB:
I. The CCMPANY and the CCMMISSION do hereby stipulate as follows:
A. The CXlMPANY began operation at its Acme facility in 1883. Currently, the CXJMPANY manufactures formaldehyde, hexamine, sulfuric acid, and chloropicrin. Nondischarge Permit No. 2361-R2 authorized the ITT1PANY to operate a lagoon-type wastewater treatment system. followed by disposal onto a ten-acre and 20-acre sprayfield. Pennit No. 2361-R2 expired on March 1, 1989.
B. The CXlMPANY was issued Notices of Violation on January 5, 1989 and February 2, 1990 for exceedances of the follawing standards at its perimeter of oompliance around its ten-acre sprayfield: total dissolved solids, sulfates, nitrates, formaldehyde, chromiIBTI, iron, and manganese. On May 12, 1989, the a::MPANY was issued Notices of Violation for operating a lagoon and sprayfield system (previously authorized by Nondischarge Pennit No. 2361-R2) without a pennit and discharging wastewater in surface waters without a pennit (authorized by NPDES Pennit NC0003395). On January 16, 1990, the CXlMPANY submitted analytical data from monitor well 16 that showed that the sulfuric acid spill, which =ed on the plant site on Cecember 6, 1989, violated the follawing standards at the perimeter of oompliance: pH, total dissolved solids, and sulfates. On January 29, 1990, the CXlMPANY was issued a Notice of Violation for the illegal discharge of wastewater from seeps and springs into Livingston Creek in the vicinity of the wastewater lagoons. Livingston Creek is classified as class c-swamp waters of the State.
C. This matter ccncerns sources of groundwater oontamination that originate on a parcel of property located at Acme, Columbus County, North carolina. This matter has been designated as Incident NlllTibers 14, 15, 3832, and the site of the sulfuric acid spill by the Groillldwater Section of the Division of Environmental Management (D!'11) of the I:Bpartment of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources (DEHNR) . The sources of ccntamination include the sulfuric acid spill, the lagoons, the ten-acre sprayfield, and the twenty-acre sprayfield.
• •
D. The CDMPANY is the a,mer of the subject property. The CDMPANY has received the necessary authorization from all record property awners to undertake the activities listed in Section II.
E. The perimeter of compliance for the lagoons and sprayfields is established at a horizontal distance of 500 feet from the waste boundary or at the property boundary, whichever is closer to the source. At the sulfuric acid spill site, no compliance boundary exists for this source: underneath this site, Class GA groundwaters begin at the top of the saturated zone. Attachment I shows a rrap \.iith the =mpliance boundaries of the permitted facilities.
F. The rraximum alla..;able contaminants levels for Class GA Waters found in 15A NCAC 2L .202 are being exceeded for the following constituents within or outside of the perimeter of compliance: pH, total dissolved solids; sulfates, nitrates, formaldehyde, chromium, iron,. and manganese.
G. Within the past five years, the CCMPANY has spent $1.20 million on environmental improvements. Within the next two years, furthermore, it is projected that the CDMPANY will spend $3. 99 million to correct the air, surface water, and groundwater problems at its Acme facility.
II. The c::cMPANY, desiring to comply with the legal requirements of the mMMISSION regarding underground water quality standards and with all pertinent provisions of the law and applicable rules of the COMMISSION does hereby agree to do and perform the following activities:
A. The CDMPANY discontinued use of its ten-acre and twenty-acre sprayfield during January 1990.
B. On February 28, 1990, the CDMPANY submitted to the Division a remedial action plan to eliminate the springs and seeps in the lagoon area that have discharged wastewater into Livingston Creek, classified C-SWamp waters of the State. Once the Division approves this remedial action plan, the CCMPANY will install and operate the remedial system within 90 days.
C. On March 23, 1990, the CDMPANY submitted the the Division an application for a nondischarge permit to construct and operate a lined 2,300,000 gallon storage pond. The CXMPANY needs this storage lagCXJn to store its wastewater until it has successfully negotiated a discharge or nondischarge permit to dispose of its wastewater without violating surface water or groundwater quality standards. Once the permit application for the lined storage lagoon is completed, the Division will assure that the permit is issued within no more than 90 days. The CCMPANY will install and operate the lined storage lagoon within 90 days after permit issuance.
• .)
VII. The a::MPANY and the D1v1s:wn agree that the stipulated penalties are not
due if the ffi1FANY satisfies the Division that non-compliance was cause:l by
events or circumstances beyond the a::MPANY' S central. Any dispute over the
stipulated penalty shall be determined by the Office of Administrative
Hearings.
VIII. Nothing -in this SOC shall prevent the a::MPANY from seeking a variance,
reclassification or permit which if granted by the (U,!MJSSION may affect
the a::MPANY's obligations under this SOC.
IX. The CCTfflSSION agrees that this SOC shall pertain only to the source anj
property identified in Section I.C. of this SOC. Unless an applicable
Special Order or permit has been issued by the (U,!MJSSION, violations of
groundwater quality standards resulting from additional sources for 1,:hich
the o::MPANY is resp:insible may subject the a::MPANY to all sanctions
provided by North Carolina General Statute 143-215.6.
X. The a::MPANY hereby agrees tc waive any rights it may have to seek judicial
review to challenge this SOC or to seek a stay of enforcement of this SOC.
However, the o::M,lISSION acknowledges that this waiver does not prohibit the
a::MPANY from seeking amendment of this SOC if any regulatory standards or
other grounds upon which this soc is based are changed subsequent to its
execution. In such cases, the o::MPANY may petition that the SOC be amerded
to reflect those regulatory . or other grounds for change or up:in other
grounds satisfactory to the (U,!MJSSION.
XI. This SOC is not transferable. Any successive owners or occupiers of the
subject property must apply to the (U,!MJSSION for a separate SOC.
XII. If the o::MPANY proposes to change any of the activities set out in Section
II. above, the a::MPANY must apply to the (U,!MJSSION for a modification tc
this SOC.
This the day of --------------1990.
Wright Corporation
ATTESTED: BY:
(Title)
(Address)
APPROVED AND ACCEPTED:
BY:
Chairman, Environmental Management Commission
Approved by the Environmental Management Commission on the
----------' 1990.
day of
• •
D. The cx::MPANY will submit its application for an NPDES permit by April
31, 1990. Six months from the date this SOC is signed, the cx::M?ANY
will inform the Division of the results of its feasiblity study. This
study has been designed to provide the cx::MPANY with a framework to
decide if it is possible to discharge its wastewater into surface
waters or if will be necessary to pursue a nondischarge option.
E. Once the CXX'PANY selects the disposal option, the cx::MPANY will design
the system and apply for the appropriate pennit within six months of
completion of the feasibility study. Once the pennit application is
completed, the Division will assure that the pennit review will be
=mpleted within no more than 90 clays if the application is for a
nondischarge pennit; and the review will be =mpleted within no more
than 180 days if the application is for an authorization to =nstruct
a wastewater treatment system. Construction and operation of this
system will begin within 18 months after pennit issuance.
F. The cx::MPANY will submit to the Division by June 15, 1990, a
action plan that will provide for the restoration of
groundwater underneath the sulfuric acid spill site.
remedial
impacted
G. The cx::MPANY will submit to the Division by April 30, 1990, a report
that assesses the extent and significance of exceedances of standards
at and beyond the perimeter of =mpliance ·around the ten-acre
sprayfield. A remedial action plan to restore the groundwater quality
to GA standards will be submitted to the Division by May 15, 1990.
H. If the Division determines that the unlined lagoons are causing or
=ntributing · to water quality violations in Livingston Creek, the
cx::MPANY will line or abandon the lagoons within twelve months of the
cx::MPANY'S receipt of the Notice of Violation.
III. The cx::MPANY shall properly operate and maintain the facility so as to
minimize the impact of groundwater =ntamination during the period this SOC
is in effect.
IV. This SOC shall remain in effect until five years after the date of its
approval. The cc::MPANY agrees that any remediation activities commenced
pursuant to paragraph II. shall =ntinue beyond the expiration date of this
SOC unless modifications are approved by the Director of the Division of
Environmental Management.
V. The cx::MPANY shall submit no later than fourteen (14) days after the
deadline for completing each item required in Section II., certification to
the Director of the Division of Environmental Management whether such item
has been performed. This provision does not apply to the submission of
monitoring reports.
• •
VI. The CXl-lPANY agrees that tmless excused the CXl-lPANY will pay the cx::MMISSION a=rding to the following schedule for failure to meet the deadlines set out in Section II. :
Deadlines and Reguirerrents
A. Install and operate a
remedial system to
eliminate the springs
and seeps within 90 days
after the remedial action
plan is approved by the
Division.
B. Install and operate a
line:l storage lagoon
by September 19, 1990.
C. Complete the feasi-
bility study and
submit to the Division
within six months after
the sex:: is signed.
D. Constnict and operate
a non:lischarge system
within 21 months after
the feasibility study is
=ipleted.
E. Constnict and operate a
discharging system within
24 months after the feasi-
bility study is cmnpleted.
F. SUbmi t a remedial action
plan on the sulfuric acid
spill by June 15, 1990.
G. SUbmit an assessment plan
on the ten-acre sprayfield
by April 30, 1990.
H. Submit a remedial action
plan on the ten-acre
sprayfield by May 15, 1990.
Stipulated Penalty
Each of the stipulated penalties in deadlines and requirements numbered A-H shall be applie:l for each day of continued violation. Payments shall be made by certified check, rrade payable to the "D2parbrent of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources", and shall be rrade within fourteen (14) days following demand by the Director of the Division of Environmental Management.
l-·J P I G HT CO Ff F-;.'1 C t-1 E
1, ,-
_<:;,J,;,,-/; :S-L ..-, >o ,v,-,,,,:<;_,/ , ' I' '
/ '"----rl~-,.._
/, _2_.
,:,, .
....L.h/t'l
FILE CODE, -a--"· •c..:.'~-'~'.:.· .. · .. • ... • .:.·1
--j
~BIL.CA.2...CO __ DUJH_OILPE
I! 'I 'if" -'JO
!, l:
/ f . I (L... .
_i/ i I /i ! t' ' •• ' I I
•
3/30/90 Standard Report Page 1
PARAMETER STA.1 STA.2 STA. 3 STA. 4 STA.6 STA.7
-------------------------------------- ------- ------- --------------
UNPERMI UNPERMI UNPERMI UNPERMI AERATIO EQUALIZ
DISCHAR DISCHAR DISCHAR DISCHAR POND BASIN
* COD mg/1 210 720 45 51 13000 61000
TSS mg/1 17 290 43 32 1200 3200
pH s. u. 2.4 4.1 5.7 6.7 7.9 8.3
TOC mg/1 24 150 18 11 4500 23000
CHLORIDE mg/1 69 170 52 16 370 750
* FORMALDEHYDE mg/1 16 390 10 0.6 10000 40000
OIL & GREASE mg/1 <1 3 <1 1 8 7
SPECIFIC COND. umho 6300 4500 520 140 14000 24000
PHENOLS ug/1 4 3 <2.0 2 9 <200
SULFATE mg/1 2000 2500 88 6 600 110
* SULFIDE mg/1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 1. 6 1.8
NH3 AS N mg/1 190 550 35 7.3 3000 7600
TKN AS N mg/1 440 870 200 10 6300 48000
N02 + N03 mg/1 130 15 2.4 2.6 .01 .05
PHOS. TOTAL mg/1 9.5 5.5 .28 .15 3.0 2.6
* ORTHO PHOS. mg/1 7.1 1.7 .02 .05 .32 1. 9
CADMIUM ug/1 54 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0
T.CHROMIUM ug/1 50 110 <25 <25 43 44
COPPER ug/1 4800 45 19 11 18 7.1
NICKEL ug/1 110 37 <10 <10 32 37
* LEAD ug/1 160 94 17 <10 75 80
ZINC ug/1 7400 490 100 <10 200 260
BARIUM ug/1 10 32 22 20 31 44
SILVER ug/1 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0
ALUMINUM ug/1 98000 73000 2800 410 8100 2700
* BERYLLIUM ug/1 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10
CALCIUM mg/1 370 160 17 6.4 11 12
COBALT ug/1 67 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50
IRON ug/1 60000 120000 4600 1100 15000 26000
LITHIUM ug/1 130 45 <25 <25 <25 <25
* MAGNESIUM mg/1 110 20 2.8 1.8 5.1 3.9
MANGANESE ug/1 2500 1100 66 23 52 110
SODIUM mg/1 130 140 29 6.3 320 360
T. ARSENIC ug/1 290 230 <10 <10 64 <100
SELENIUM ug/1 <50 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0
MERCURY ug/1 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2
•
SOC PROPOSED DATES
I. Wastewater Treatment System
1. Feasibility study - 6 months
•
Guommw;;1 rn scc11c-t1
WILMING10N REGIONAL OFFICE
During this.time we decide which discharge option
we will go with -creek or spray£ields.
2. Design treatment system - 6 months
Apply £or permits during this time.
3. Permit revieY and issuance - 3 months
4. Construction -18 months
5. Compliance with discharge limits -2 months
Debugging period i£ discharge to creek
or begin spray fields.
II. Groundwater Issues
1. Sulfuric acid spill -June 15
Submit remedial action plan
2. 10 acre spray:t:ield
assessment -April 30
RAP -Nay.15
3. Lagoons
Line or abandon wit~1n 12 months a£ter receiving
a Notice·o£ Violation i£ impacting creek.
4. Seeps and springs
Engineering end design -2 months
Install - 3 months
5. Storage pond
Apply -2 months
Permit reviev -3 months
Construct -3 months
<fl ,--n [ (; t 0 > 0 y
> C > ' r 9 r, CJ )) 0
~ 7 -C r-'1 [' r i1 :> I J
c1 'T CJ ... }_:~: .. --. --'' ··• r· : \I) ". ----•----·-··------------· -·
-i -':1 a r, ( ) u, C, J ' 0 0 C 0 p· ,1 0 L.. 0 C '•
C J } ? w \.,
? n !J) ' 0 "I J ' tJ 6 r ' ;] J ~ --/) ·a I ,)' -0 r') t
,•' 'D '..J v') -l n ,, I 0 (: ( 0 ) i7 t' r') -l (\ 0 C 6' ~ ''i> -J V ' -· 0 } ii p -, r 11 J C I r lj v~ J ,.,. -i (' r 0 1 ,.,. •-· ..!. 0 y VI ), iJ , .. t --1 . ' (/) ll -1 ,.. ? (' _t -(' l -(j\ > v1 v1 (i V) ' f ), v -'I ~ r ,_ () -J rl 0 twj { -v (' -,-'j 0 () (J r --/ (l v') V' •-t I,__., ~, T {I lj J "" ,.. 'J r (\ 1/) l/)
I ' . if\ J vi r'I -{ -(,) r 0 ) U'· ? > C "(
l,1 -( -r1 V)
~-'J J 0 (1 ,? v (\ n ,_., C r .-/ ' J 1 JI r'] C 7 C n ,'\ ~ n v-1 .-(' ? r : -l T ,[ , ..
J v -· ~-0 1-'J [ J ,1 4 ) r'i () ,-...I} lj ) ,· -.J ~ ,~.:] I (/) v"l
,..
0 ( ~ -( :1 ,, 1 iJ > r ( 0 (
t ' -j r 17 n 1 {j\ ,;J ,.. L, CI r1 S' ,, J D r D (1 C r ) ,} 0 -G •''! -,-· r1 ·) 1 l.j -r L.. 0 -"f ,q co :J ! ...r, I )1 > J 0 a Cl r'l r r, -, a r ,.. C•) Ji ) () ,,-• I. 0 J) ,( ('\ (i r -~ ) 0 -( V) ·1 0 > !I ,, . V' 'l < J ' .. I .~ (' ,.
0 ~ 0 J --u ) ~ {_ ;:; -C vJ (} vJ C ;> ' •·i
i I.... r1 ri 0 " r V) J f.t 7 ..J G ,, 'J ' ) 0
-~ r•·i -J r1 --0 A r, ,~1 r\ 'J p ½' Vj
~ r 51 t V r 0 a '• i'1 1 .,, -.[ 0 --· r ..... r J V/ J -,) l,-'! J ,Ji
✓1 r1 .J n ' . l/) /)
--f ,.-:; 0 _, . .D ! ; 0 0 ~
"'' -'
! I
~.
' I.
I
r
(J
i ! I i I I
!. --I : ' I -L I ' ---· . ~ . ! ' I -i '
! ' r .! ·--: ·-L !-I. I
' I l I ;· j. I ' ' I ,-~-, I
I I -~ t; ,r, U1 -, )·,-,• ·-~ i
! ' 0 I[' ,-I ' (;, ~ I,. h 0 I '' (.; 'J
! ! I g ,o j 1 1
; . ,r1 I "'i: l-' 0 b ' '() ! rl I " ' ·-~ ~ -· l) \ '.J 0 I ! ' if ' :\
' I,. jJ I ~ i\ ' [--0 i' tL7 ~ 1J I I ? ' r:• ' k I
!> ' ,.J r u [,) f~ t)\ • !] ' 0 I C b 1~-,, t ' ' ,, n ' J··: ·t-1 ' r· !~" p i I
0 l-! ,J 0 I r I I • lj ,-·~ • i-1 I/ ' I ,..,
'--i I I 'i j I i ' i
I I I I I ;~r l: ! I I I I., )' 0 µ. ' 'i1 ' I I ;,: I ' I'' tr I L ,:-t I h r;. r :·\ r: ;.-1 I l,) ;.J ,~ i..-1
i ;-, ( " ~ r h ' ii ,[ ,0 i ,, ( I I [ '
I
!.,,.j I, ~\ I ~ I
[ I 6 h H I if; ~ ' \-I I t·· i"') ,,
r ~ !1 f ' / I.
I v L, :.J. I ... . ' r~ 'j, i . ,pi I '' .r • I [ n ' M ' ' L,1 .,
b ' r •✓ (/~
I n I I I J ; ' C • '. > r,
f I I [r\ I r:~ (' j 0 b 0 r n I i.1 r"' '-
' ' 0 , ' (' ., il1 n _, I j I c ! .• ' ,-· I ,. 1 r j'""t
rj ,,,, 1· ,,
t· ..
1 I. r ~-,I
() f-, /).,. F !' ~ j' ~ .. {/i ,,
i 1' ,, l I ,,·,
I l
• •
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
March 15, I 990
MEMORANDUM
, To: Ted Bush
Through: Larry Ausley~,
RECEIVED
From: Thom Mistele =,w.,__ Wil!';iir.zlo!·1 r:c.:~ion:,I Office
n~ ~.-
Subject: Results of aquatic toxicity tests of Wright Chemical Corporation and Livingston
Creek, Columbus County.
Acute toxicity tests were performed on grab samples from unperrnitted discharges at
Wright Chemical Corporation (NC0003395) and from Livingstun Creek, the receiving
stream. The samples were collected on February 13, 1990, by Mike Williams and David
Vogt. The tests perfom1ed were 48-hour acute toxicity tests using Ceriodaphnia dubia.
Test results, total residual chlorine (TRC), specific conductance, and ammonia
concentrations for each effluent sample are presented below. The results of other chemical
analyses will be reported to you directly by the Chemistry Laboratory.
Sam12le Station TRC S12ec. Cond. H
Wright Chem 01 UPDt 1.0 mg/I 6300 µmhos/cm
Wright Chem 02 UPD <0.01 4500
Wright Chem 03 UPD <0.01 520
Livingston Cr 10 Upstream <0.01 I I 0
Livingston Cr 11 Downstream <0.01 150
Livingston Cr 13 At Wright Chem lagoon <0.01 260
Wright Chem 15 Cooling water discharge <0.01 580
t Unpermitted Discharge.
tt Values determined from samples submitted directly 10 Chemistry Laboratory.
Ht 20% mortality in highest test concentration (90%).
If further information on these tests is required, please contact me at 733-2136.
Basin: 03-06-17
cc: Central Files
Mike Williams
David Vogt
NT-13-N
240 mg/I
400
18
0.07
1.5
6.7
11
LC50
<5%
<5%
None
P20tH
None
None
None
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
• •
CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN
UNPERMITTED DISCHARGE VIOLATIONS
WRIGHT CORPORATION
RIEGELWOOD, NORTH CAROLINA
PREPARED FOR:
WRIGHT CORPORATION
RIEGELWOOD, NORTH CAROLINA
PREPARED BY:
AWARE ENVIRONMENTAL INC.
9305 MONROE ROAD, SUITE J
CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA
FEBRUARY 27, 1990
AEI JOB NO. N151-0l
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I -
• •
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
On December 11, 1989, the North Carolina Department of
Environment, Health and Natural Resources, Division of
Environmental Management (DEM) performed a compliance evaluation
of the Wright Corporation (WRIGHT) chemical plant in Riegelwood,
North Carolina. During this compliance evaluation, five (5)
unpermitted discharges to Livingston Creek were observed, and
documented by DEM. Samples from four (4) of these discharges
were collected and analyzed by DEM. These samples were reported
to contain elevated amounts of nutrients and heavy metals. A
sample from the fifth discharge observed by the DEM was not
obtained.
As a result of the inspection, a formal Notice of Violation
(NOTICE) was submitted to WRIGHT on January 29, 1990. Within the
NOTICE, DEM requested that WRIGHT develop and implement a
Corrective Action Plan (Plan) to resolve/remediate the
unpermitted discharges. Subsequent to the NOTICE, the number of
unpermitted discharges requiring corrective action was reduced by
the DEM from five (5) to three (3).
The proposed Plan consists of constructing a concrete lined
drainage ditch and catch basin at each of the three (3) discharge
locations. Discharges captured by the collection systems will be
gravity fed to pump stations and. reintroduced into the existing
on-site wastewater treatment plant for eventual discharge via one
i
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
• •
of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)
permitted outfalls.
The proposed Plan has been selected as a short-term, cost
effective method of mitigating the unpermitted discharges until
the planned new wastewater treatment facility, which is currently
being designed, is completed. This upgrade of the wastewater
treatment plant is anticipated to effectively eliminate the
unpermitted discharges by either upgrading, or deactivating
existing units which may be contributing to the flow.
ii
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
SECTION NO.
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
3.1
3.2
4.1
4.2
• •
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TITLE PAGE NO.
Executive Summary i
Table of Contents iii
List of Figures iv
List of Tables iv
Introduction 1
Site Location and Description 3
Unpermitted Discharges 5
Location of Discharges 5
Characterization of the 7
Discharges
Corrective Action Plan 9
Description of Corrective 9
Action Plan
Schedule 11
iii
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
i I
I
I
I
I
FIGURE NO.
3-1
4-1
TABLE NO.
3-1
• •
LIST OF FIGURES
TITLE PAGE NO.
Site Topographic Map 6
Typical Surface Water Collection 10
System
LIST OF TABLES
TITLE PAGE NO.
Results of December 11, 1989
Sampling
8
iv
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
•
SECTION 1.0
INTRODUCTION
•
On December 11, 1989, the North Carolina Department of
Environment, Health and Natural Resources, Division of
Environmental Management (DEM) performed a compliance evaluation
of the Wright Corporation (WRIGHT) chemical plant in Riegelwood,
North Carolina. During this compliance evaluation, five (5)
unpermitted discharges to Livingston Creek were observed, and
documented by DEM. Samples from four (4) of these discharges
were collected and analyzed by DEM. These samples were reported
to contained elevated amounts of nutrients and heavy metals. A
sample from the fifth discharge observed by the DEM was not
obtained.
Subsequent to the DEM inspection, a formal Notice of Violation
(NOTICE) was submitted to WRIGHT on January 29, 1990. This
NOTICE cited WRIGHT for violating North Carolina General statute
143-215.1, by making outlets into the waters of the State without
applying for and receiving a National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) permit(s) from the DEM. In addition,
the Notice required Wright to submit a written response to DEM by
February 28, 1990 indicating the corrective action(s) to be taken
to eliminate the discharge(s).
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
• •
This report has been prepared in response to the NOTICE and
addresses correcting the aforementioned violation by constructing
a surface water collection system to capture the flow from the
unpermitted discharge points and reintroduce it into the
existing on-site treatment facility.
2
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
• •
SECTION 2.0
SITE LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION
The WRIGHT plant is located in Riegelwood, North Carolina on
State Route 1818, north of us Highway 74. The WRIGHT property
encompasses approximately 720 acres in Columbus County.
Elevations on-site range from approximately 6 feet above Mean Sea
Level (MSL) in the flood plain of Livingston Creek, to
approximately 40 feet above MSL at the intersection of State
Route 1818 and the plant entrance road.
Approximately 45 acres of the WRIGHT property have been developed
for use, while the remaining portions consist primarily of
swamps, wetlands, wooded areas and pastures. Man-made features
include office, storage and production buildings; wastewater
treatment impoundments; above ground storage tanks; cooling
towers; spray fields; paved and gravel access roads and parking
areas, and a duck pond.
The WRIGHT chemical plant site is located on the southern edge of
the property, bordered to the north by the confluence of Mill and
Livingston Creeks, and to the south by the Seaboard System
Railroad right-of-way and the KAISER facility. The eastern flank
of the WRIGHT site is bordered by highway 1818. Livingston Creek
is contiguous to the western flank of the plant site.
3
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
• •
WRIGHT currently manufactures formaldehyde, chloropicrin,
hexamethylenetetramine (hexamine), and sulfuric acid at the
Riegelwood facility. The wastewater generated from these
chemical manufacturing processes is aerated in a series of on-
site impoundments and subsequently discharged through a spray
irrigation system onto an NPDES permitted 20 acre field located
north of the plant site on WRIGHT property.
Additionally, WRIGHT operates an NPDES permitted outfall into
Livingston Creek for the discharge of non-contact cooling water.
This water is discharged via the outfall impoundment located
immediately north of the equalization basin on site.
4
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
• •
SECTION 3.0
UNPERMITTED DISCHARGES
Five unpermitted discharges were addressed in the NOTICE. The
locations of these discharges are shown on Figure 3-1. On
February 2, 1990, representatives from WRIGHT and DEM met to
discuss the violations cited in the NOTICE. As a result of this
meeting, two of the unpermitted discharges (i.e. Nos. 1 and 2)
addressed by the NOTICE were determined to be unrelated to
WRIGHT, and therefore need not be addressed by this Corrective
Action Plan. The locations of the three (3) remaining unpermitted
discharges (Nos. 3, 4, and 5) for which corrective action is
required are described below.
3.1 Location of Discharges
According to the NOTICE, discharge no. 3 was observed adjacent to
the northwest side of the equalization basin, south of monitoring
well MW-9. Discharge no. 4 was observed east of the equalization
basin and north of the cooling towers, adjacent to the gravel
access road. Discharge no. 5 was observed at the base of the
embankment, immediately west of the formaldehyde plant (see
Figure 3-1).
5
I
6.7
I 8.7
A
'
JI I Al ,-. ,-,.
EN~A~NMENT AL INC. 111 II • /JJaa
W.E. 26.2
W.E.12.6
x 34.3
FIGURE 3-1
Site Topographic Map
@)General Discharge Location
Scale Approximately l" = JOO'
N
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
• •
3.2 Characterization of the Discharges
The results of the DEM analysis of sampi'es collected on December
11, 1989, from discharge no. 3 and discharge no. 4 are summarized
in Table 3-1. In general, these samples were found to contain
elevated levels of nutrients and heavy metals at concentrations
in excess of the North Carolina primary and secondary drinking
water standards.
Flow rates from each of the three (3) discharges have been
recently estimated by WRIGHT at approximately 1 to 2 gallons per
minute (GPM). While these estimates have been used for conceptual
design of the proposed remediation system, these flow rates will
be confirmed prior to final design of the proposed surface water
collection system. Seasonal variations in flow rates will be
estimated by interviewing plant personnel.
7
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
• •
TABLE3-1
RESULTS OF DECEMBER 11, 1989
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
SAMPLING AT WRIGHT CORPORATION
PARAMETER UNITS
NH3as N mg/1 400 1,600
TKN as N mg/I 470 10.000
NO2 plus NO3 as N mg/I 58 26
P: Total as P mg/I 0.29 4.9
Primary Drinking Water Standards
Arsenic: Total ug/1 <10 <100
Cadmium: Total ug/1 4.1 <2.0
Chromium: Total ugil <25 160
Lead ug/1 1,300 81
Selenium ug// NA NA
Silver ug/1 <5.0 <5.0
Secondary Drinking Water Standards
Copper ug/1 49 72
Iron ug/1 170,000 250.000
Manganese ug/1 2,000 1,900
Zinc ug/1 7,900 17,000
Miscellaneous Metals
Aluminum ug/1 41,000 130,000
Berylium ugl/ <25 <25
Calcium mgil 440 350
Cobalt ug/1 <50 <50
Lithium ug/1 25 92
Magnesium mg/I 20 38
Nickel ug// 77 96
Sodium mg/I 77 260
8
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I·
I
I
I
I
I
I
•
SECTION 4.0
CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN
•
The proposed Corrective Action Plan has been selected as a short-
term, cost effective method of mitigating the unpermitted
discharges during the interim period until the planned new
wastewater treatment plant, currently being designed, is
completed. Completion of the new treatment facility is
anticipated to effectively eliminate the unpermitted discharges,
by either upgrading, or deactivating existing units which may be
contributing to these discharges.
4.1 Description of Corrective Action Plan
The proposed Plan will include a system of catch basins, piping
and lift stations, designed to prevent the unpermitted discharges
from entering Livingston Creek. This water will be collected and
rerouted into the existing on-site wastewater treatment plant for
discharge via one of the current NPDES permitted outfalls.
In order to capture the discharges, a concrete lined drainage
•ditch will be constructed at each point of discharge. These
ditches will divert flow into catch basins where it will be piped
via gravity flow into one of two collection points and pumped
back into the existing treatment facility (Figure 4-1). Each
discharge point will be lined with rip-rap to impede erosion. An
earthen berm will be constructed upgradient of each discharge
9
------------------
STORM WATER
DIVERSION BERM
UNPERMlTTED DISCHARGE POINT
RIP-RAP
=11 ll=-11
PLAN VIEW
SECTION VIEW
FIGURE 4-1
11= =11=
CONCRETE LINED
DITCH
TYPICAL SURFACE WATER COLLECTION SYSTEM
PRE-CAST CONCRETE ·
CATCH BASIN
COLLECTION POINT
NOT TO SCALE
Ai.IA 1'"'1,-
EN~R~NMENTAL INC. , ......
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
• • point to divert storm water run-off from entering the collection
system. The specific details pertaining to the final design and
specifications of the system will be developed upon receipt of
approval of the proposed Plan by DEM.
4.2 Schedule
Pending Approval of this proposed Plan by DEM, detailed design
and construction of the collection system will be initiated. It
-is anticipated that each task item can be performed within the
following schedule.
TASK
1.
2.
3 •
4.
5.
SCHEDULE
ACTIVITY
TIME TO COMPLETE
TASK {DAYS)
Approval by DEM
Design of surface water collection
system.
Review of Design/Specifications by
DEM.
Complete Installation of Collection
System.
Total Estimated Time to Implement
Plan.
-o-
0 -60 days
60 -75 days
75 -165 days
165 days
Wright will keep the DEM informed as to the status of plan
implementation.
11
• •
STA.8 STA.9 STA.10 STA.11 STA.12 STA.14 STA.15 WQ STANDARD ----------------------------------------------------------------LINED SPILL LIVINGS LIVINGS LIVINGS BLANK 002 OUT FRESHWATER STAN
POND BASIN CREEK U CREEK D @ CFR SAMPLE COOLING CURRENT 1/1/90
130000 6600 30 20 52 <5 55 N/A
110 70 <1 1 43 <1 4 N/A
7.5 8.0 6.7 6.6 7.0 5.0 7.3 6.0-9.0 s.u
39000 2400 8 8 16 <5 19 N/A
600 250 12 16 67 <1 120 230 mg/1 (AL)
18000 500 <0.1 0.7 0.1 <0.1 20 N/A
40 <1 1 <1 <1 1 <1 N/A
4300 1200 110 150 390 2 580 N/A
2 4 3 <2.0 4 <2 38 N/A
140 650 6 12 22 <5 28 N/A
<0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 N/A
700 3200 .08 1. 3 .24 .03 11 N/A
37000 5600 0.4 2.6 0.8 <0.1 14 N/A
9.4 .01 .15 .67 .62 .01 3.8 N/A
.77 3.4 .02 .04 .20 .01 .41 N/A
.11 2.7 <.01 <.01 .04 <.01 .22 N/A
<2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 2.0 ug/1
<25 <25 <25 <25 <25 <25 <25 50 ug/1
44 5.2 <2.0 7.6 <2.0 2.7 8.0 7 ug/1 (AL)
57 28 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 88 ug/1
<10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 25 ug/1
320 22 <10 19 14 <10 43 50 ug/1 (AL)
21 <10 22 22 44 <10 24 N/A
<5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 0.06 ug/1 (AL)
270 870 180 420 2400 <50 320 N/A
<10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 117 ng/1
15 9.9 11 11 9.9 .06 14 N/A
<50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 N/A
380 1800 84 1100 3300 <50 1800 1000 ug/1
<25 <25 <25 <25 <25 <25 <25 N/A
2.2 3.5 1. 6 1.8 2.8 <.02 3.0 N/A
77 24 20 22 150 <10 44 N/A
490 210 5.8 8.7 59 .06 77 N/A
<10 62 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 50 ug/1
<5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 5 ug/1
<0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 0.012 ug/1
.___ . ···•·· ------
C r, ' 0 ·~
>-
ii -j
~
rJ r
(5'
0 (/1
0
c;-· C
V J"
0 E 1...-
,)
0
C L ·~ J
---------
(T"
.)::, r
0 (J
J f\) ,.., 0 )> C \ )
-(' J u l v
~ ' r1
a
('
y
0
C
J
0
(} ,-
-'· ~
0 r. (j
vl
~1
C L > lJ)
-··
r'
C L
> -·.
r'
'7
0
iJ
r\ ) 0
0 'J -cl
'~ f, -,
7 ,n
0
y ·, p
,Y
) J
C ,,.-;
V ··, 0 / ,.., r, V ! r \/) .....
_o ·'Q
(1
t .J
r -I
--/
~
)>
J
C
)> ,,. y
-(
,-
c. I/ r
_Q
rJ
LI\
0 > r
E -i ,....
0 > J VJ -1 V)
,.I\ ..
(
(..
' ,.l-1
1
1 )
'7
J
I r'
)
-j
)
r1
J
--1
' '7
(\
JC: ,. J
?~ > •c / 1' J1 (\ --> . v'! . p ; --
'v r·1 r1 [,1
V)
) [f,
r) 'J
J 7
1 1, /
I -,
r,
r
(i
(
0
1}1
r'i -r'i
u
.Vi
' 6
? >
J -~ 0
Q
J /Ji -I )! J
1 r
J ,-0 J
\ vJ
-1
f'I
r ,'1 r 8 r'l C 'J ' I --i r 0 -p ~ >
' ..,
( ,....
L, 0
,--1 J r r
(J
)
VJ
j
a
)
J
J
0
[
J I
M ...,
--/
', -,,J
)
J
('
('
0
'J ' 'J 0
--r )1
' ..-;
,-
0
J
C
a
)>
(
~
0
u, -c
L >
'i r'
c-/
0 (
!'-i (_
?
0 ,.
r..J 0
' •-).) ,..,
G (\ .. ' 0
'J 0 I co -0 0 0
0 9
0
r-1
[,I
)
..J '
0 •
I I I ! ,
I I I I i
I
I ! i I
{/2 I
' , I
' 1 ! ' :
(I !
I
I
I '
! ~;
i !
0 h -,
I u 0 ' I I I ( i :,,.: j ' i
i
i 5 J ,
I
~, g • i 1 <' •
0
D, C ~-I
I I ,I i Cl p! I I
i 0 u .~~ ol
,(J '
' i ' ~ ~ I
'
I 1 '1 0. Ui --1 I ..;I I
n V) -, f-, ~ J I· 1-i
~ C/1 ,
\ I
-, < I I q ! I ' i • ,) ,
d V1
~ I )i 61
Cl /' ] ~I . \ ;,,' j /1 I I I ·1
I
d ···i
A i ,
i d ,
<(I .,.., ('
1! ~ I
I _j
!
t..! .. ,
')
( , ii a ~ Ci
J C r Vo 6, ~ :) -. ~ ' .,
}! '"'
0 D J J I '·1
Q ; I Ir; C <1
(·~
I
J
(J " '
Q -1 3 (J ' I
{;; I
r, ,J ~ , -, Q q I
' I {i J._j J ~ 8
h r: .,
I ! IJ)
I
' I I
i I I vi I
t,' V-! ~ ,1 I
@ I
' ' 1-·j "I !
1 I
Vi ~
') ' ~ ~ ! f~ ~-I i I
('! Iii
I
12! d .rl H I [ I I I I
' :i d ) ,n
I H
l,), ~ I: I q µ ! i I
' I I u: I <i ' I I -, i I
) µ ... , d [i I D. ' ., I
'
CJ.
i v1 I n D i
1 J] I I I
~ < p <i ri I q J
I
I -0 j 111 vj • I
'I ' \~l ~ '
11!
I '
;; I .., ..,
i
J I
q Ii ~ ! !
I Q d I "1 ~-: .., .6
I I
ci ,~ ..., ' I
J
I ,;
3 '
c7 '' r , ~ I Vi Ir J n .~j Q ' I
I \ ~ -i .I
' i '
r, \,.; ~
I Vi a 1 I i
i ~ j VJ '-J u ' ! -•-V I J.
I I
I
,j)
(~ ' ' 3 , -0 'C
A j
I -i ' \J I L! J, '
l
0 l I (/) l1 ,, I
i l ,I J 11
, I J I . I U\ i
I I ~ .a u'j -
I I
:, '? if/
1
--·1 . I J-i. u,
vii ~
J 111 I
i
'' v, I ~ I {i I I l) , " ;-• r::
~ ,, \) ; ' 'I ' I -1 .., ' !
r' J1 ...r1 I ; q H H
.-l I 0 '! J . ' µ, , ---' <l 1! "· ' I d ,_
\ i ·, , I
0 I
~, -' Q I I ' I' d I i I ~1 ' I -: 1 v-1 ' q --: (l ,{,
' I ~ J ct J, '
l-j I -\
! ,
0
I
Di ! Cj
,
/: ,(j
1 ---~ 9
{'ii I
~ .:.-j u
-; I J {" -, I ,
--; ,,,
·/l h J. -,
I
1 ~
I (I)
'
I
u·1 '
I
-'
0 l~
I i
;1 ,J ~ ,{ I
i I i
' \.ti 1 1r! I
0 i J, 1 \-1 ~ ' ii1 I
I I 0 :J \~ i ,
I
.JI I I , '
I I ,
, . • •
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
Wilmington Regional Office
James C. Martin, Governor
William \Y/ Cobt'\·, Jr., Secretary llob Jamieson
Regional Manager
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
January 29, 1990
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. Thomas H. Wright III, Vice President Wright Corporation
Box 402, Acme station
Riegelwood, North Carolina 28456
Subject: NOTICE OF VIOLATION
Illegal Discharges
Wright Corporation
Columbus County
Dear Mr. Wright:
This is to notify you that The Wright Corporation i~ in violation of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.l(a), by making outlets into the waters of the State without applying for and receiving a permit from this Division. Violations of NCGS 143-215.1 are subject to enforcement by civil penalty assessment in accordance with NCGS 143-215.6(a).
On December 11, 1989, Mr. Dann Dettmann, of Wright Corporation, Mr. Mike Williams and Mr. Paul Rawls of the Wilmington Regional Office conducted a site investigation at Wright Corporation following an acid spill which occurred along in the rail yard area. After inspection of the spill site, a compliance evaluation inspection of the plant was performed. During the compliance inspection, at least for unpermitted discharges were observed and sampled. The wastes were analyzed for metals and nutrients. The results of the analysis indicates that the four discharges sampled contain substantial amounts of nutrients and heavy metals. A fifth discharge was observed, however a sample could not be obtained. The discharges were observed entering Livingston creek, classified class c-swamp waters of the State. A copy of the site topographic map is attached containing the general location of each discharge.
7225 Wrightsville Avenue, Wilmington, NC 28403-3696 • Telephone 9!9-256--4161 • Fax [phone]
An Equal Oprortunity Affirmative Action Employer
;:,..-•
Mr. Thomas H. Wright III
Wright Corporation
NOV-January 29, 1990
Page Two
•
In order to correct these violations, the discharges must be permanently eliminated or an NPDES permit(s) must be applied for and received. A written response to this notice is requested by February 28, 1990, indicating the corrective' actions to be taken by the corporation to resolve the violations.
An enforcement report is being prepared against the company for the unlawful,discharges in accordance with NCGS 143-215.1 and NCGS 143-215.6.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please contact me at [phone].
Attachment
MW:WRIGHT.JAN
cc: Steve Tedder
WiRO
CF
Sin1/Jly, / ' d/ ) ·I__L~Yf
A.~ Howa,~J Jr., P.E. Regional Supervisor
I i l I I ! : ! I ' I
' I
i
I
!
:
I
I
C
i '
;
i
I
I I I
I I I
' 5 !
I
i .:J
I
I
I
I
I J :
I
I
I '
'
I <i
I
I 'I !
(' ·1
i
I
' el
I
~ ! '
I
I
l-/
'
I
~-
H cc i
I
I
I
i I
I
j
! u d i • I
J q
' i
!
' I
d i d ri
' ,_
!
I li ! I -
'
I a --{
~
! '
i J -1 u
i ;
\
(' H "'
'
j i
·r c.i
I !
J I I '
(1
i I <] -1 r
I
! I
I j 1-j i l-j ' I
\
'
(0 <
i ' :-1
I
I
I
G ~ Vj ~ q I
I
' '
i I i
LI : ~ [) ,,
i
' i i
1.9
I I
i -; _cl I I
' I I I i
~
I I
;:.{ H [;--1 l I I
j
! L-1 I
d q
' i i ' t
'
; I :
'
• ~ I I '~ !! ! ~ !7 r1
'
-

!

i
I:
I
'
3 ~1 1
I '
I
V1 <f
1-·-r
'
' ·1
() -,
! I
Lil
I ! -1 0 1 i ' i I I
i '
J 1
I
;t I
I [l! l-j __,'! ) I
I '
I I
I
q J --'
I
j
-l
I
ln J
vi
I
'
g j ,,,,
((1 < !
I
i
,
d
i
I
u ' vi !
/-;
I , vl ·I (; ~ t~
i !
ul i
'
I
1:
I I ) l..i
I
'
I I -;
I i '
J.1
I
,,
i
'
I
0 0
if'
-~ i 1-i
i '
! I ~j
I
i
q
' '
--I V1
' (! I
; i I
\)
C. I
V: q
1J r: i '
l
' I 't
/j I
i I
. -
'
I
I V\ . ,-L1 I
0
I
3 0 J ,.J
I
'9
}1 /, J j !
I
I ' d, ' --i
-
h' JI -; r-' i I ' A I
,.Ji H ? ~ '
I
vi -1
(' ~ !
<Q I i vi j _, ~
I
~
I
V] ' -, -,
H
'
C r, n <l ~ I
i
!
J L, -;
J -, -,
I
<' 7 .,;..;•, ()
!
<
t), \.-! J
---: J ,--
d
q J, J w I
!
V)
i J, · ~-1 i
J
i
I
--: I l _j
--' I
]
I I
r': i p ,J ! ~ ii <-j v'i
' !
I I i
(-{ -'
0
! ,_
D I .j
i ! I
' ~ 1/) ' : ---~
'
r:
!
1/l ,..,
v>' ' ,_
'
1 I 1
' ' '
Ii-!
' \[) .. , I I
I l
I
v\ I ' '
I
I i
Cl
i
I I i
\ I
,.J
I
' C) ( i
I
I
0 l--! ' I
!
h <iJ H d
: i ! ' • I I ·, I ' I ' I ! t i I ; I l I I I ' ' I !
l ! I I I I I I
I :, ' I !-I
~ j ~
~ c -0 -
• j
J 0
~ v
j m
-~ J In
(,.J
{ -
if\ u .,, j n 7
\ 0 -i,J --I
I ••
J • O'
r ~
r.. (5)
I I
0 1£)
j
0
~
-
I-
J I
3 01 :-
I
•'• • • WIF!U G HT Chem ii ca D C 0> rrpo rrarttii Cl> n
P.O. BOX 402 • RIEGELWOOD, N.C. • 2B456
Ch<,mical Identity: Sulfuric Acid 9:J 0-,o Synonyms: Battery Acid, Oil of Vitriol, Spent Sulfuric /\Ciel CI\S No. 7664-93-9, UN 1830, Corrosive
ch,,mi cal Formula: H2S04
Molecular Weight: 98.08 (Merck 1983)
Section 1: Hazardous Ingredients/Identity Information
OSHA PEL: 1 mg/m3 (NIOSH /OSHA 1978) ACGlH TLV: TWA 1 mg/m 3 (ACGIH 1983)
TELEPHONI:
91 9•655-2203
Immediately Dangerous to Life and Health (IDLH): 80 mg/m 3 (NIOSII/OSHA 1978)
Section II: Physical/Chemical Characteristics
Boiling Point: 554°F, 290°c (Merck 1983) Specific Grc1vity (H 20=l): 1.841 (Weast 1984) Vapor Pressure (mmHg): 1 at 146°c (Patty 1963) Melting Point: 50.65°F, 10.36°c (Weast 1984) Vapor Density (Air= 1): 3.4 (NIOSH/OSHA 1981) Solubility in Water: Soluble (Encyc Occupat Health and Safety 1983) AppE:arance and Odor: Clear, colorless, oily liquid when pure; brownish wh0n impure (Encyc Occupat Health and Safety 1983) Spent Sulfuric Acid is a black oily liquid (Student 1981); odorless (Merck 1981) l choking odcir. when hot (Chris 1978) Odor T!1reshold: 1 mg/m 3
:3ection III: Fire and Explosion Huzard Data
Negligible fire hazard when exposed to heat or flame. Moderate fire and explosion hazard in contact with water and many other materiuls. EX tinguishing Methods: Not flammable (Weiss 1980 p. 842) For small fires use dry chemical or carbon dioxide. Use water on combustibles burning in vicinity of this material (NFPA 1978). For lar<Je fires, flood fire an.:a with water from a distance. Do not use solid streams of water on material. Use fog if possible. Move container from area if you can do so without risk (Dot 1984).
sp,ecial Fire Fighting Procedures: Fight fire from safe distance or from protected 1 ocation. Use care, as water applied directly to this acid results in evolution of heat and causes spattering (NF'PA 1978) . Cool containers that are exposed to flames with streams of water until fire is out. l~ear positive pressure breathing apparatus and special protective clothing (Dot 1984) Unusual Fire and Explosion Hazards. When heated, it omits highly toxic fumes ot S02, so3, (Sax 1975). It is highly reactive and capable of igniting finely divided combustible materials on contact (NFP/1 1978).
Section IV: Reactivity Data
stability: It reacts violently with water and organic materials with the evolution of heat. Sulfuric Acid is moderately reactive and capable of igniting finely divided combustible materials on contact. Can undergo violent chemical change at elevated temperatures and pressure. (NFPA 1978) When heated highly toxic fumes of so2 and S03 are emitted. (SAX 1975) Sulfuric acid is extremely hazardous in contact with many materials, particularly carbides, fulminates, nitrates, picrates, powdered metals and other combustible materials. Hazardous Pnlymerization will not occur. When sulfuric acid contacts most metals, one of the by products formed is the highly fl,w•·nable, explosive hydrogen gas.
. · • • Hazardous Decomposition Products: Highly toxic fumes of sulfuric dioxides.
Section V: Health Hazard Data
Routes of entry: Inhalation (Merck 1983), skin contact (Merck 1983) ingestion (Dot 1984).
..
Acute Hazard: Corrosive to all body tissuee. Inhalation may cause serious lung damage. Contact with eyes may result in total loss of vision. Skin contact may produce severe necrosis (Merck 1983). Fatal dose for adult: between l teaspoon and~ ounce. A few drops ·could be fatal if the acid gains access to the trachea (Arena 1974) .
' I .
Chronic Hazard: Repeated exposure to the mist causes trachea bronchitis, stomatitus, conjunctivitis and gastritis (ACGIH 1980). Repeated exposure to the mist causes erosion and discoloration of the teeth.
Signs and Symptoms of Exposure, Contact causes corrosion of mucous membranes of mouth, throat, and esophagus with immediate pain and difficulty in s~allowing.
Emergency and First Aid Procedures: Move exposed victim to fresh air; if not breathing, give artificial respiration. Call emergency medical care. If breathing is difficult; give oxygen (By trained medical personnel). If contact with material occurs, flush skin or eye with running water for at least 15 -20 minutes. Keep victim quiet and maintain body temperature (Dot 1984). If ingested, do not induce vomiting. Dilute the acid immediately with large quantities of water or milk. Ingested acid should be diluted-approximately 100 times to render it harmless to tissues. Get medical attention as soon as possible (Dreisbach, Handbook of Poisoning 11th ed.) Those with chronic respiratory, gastrointestinal, or nervous diseases and any eye and skin diseases are at greater risk (Encyc Occupat Health and Safety 1983).
Section VI: Spill and Leak Procedures
Soil Spill: Dig holding area such as lagoon, pond or pit for containment. Dike flow of spilled material using soil or sandbags or foamed barriers such as polyurethane or concrete.
Air Spill: Knock down vapors with water spray. Stay upwind.
Water Spill: Neutralize with agricultural lime, slaked lime, crushed limestone or sodium bicarbonate. Add suitable material to neutralize spilled material to a pH-7.
Occupational Spill: Keep combustibles (wood, paper, oil, etc.) away from spilled material. Do not touch spilled material. Stop leak if you can do without risk. Use water spray (fog) to reduce vapors. Do not put water on leak or spill area. clean up only under supervision of an expert. Dike spill for later disposal. Keep unnessary people away. Isolate area and deny entry. Ventilate closed spaces before entering. Full protective clothing including breathing apparatus, coat, pants, gloves, boots should be worn. No skin surface should be exposed (NFPA 1978). If the spill/leak is from a small container, isolate 280 feet in all directions. Spill/leak from large container, isolate 580 feet in all directions; in downwind direct~qns, isolate an area 1.5 miles wide, 2.2 miles long. (Dot 1984)
Dispose of waste material inaccordance with applicable local, state, and federal regulations.
Page 2
' • •
section VIII: Protective Equipment
Local exhaust ventilation should be suffi~ient to meet OSHA PEL. Avoid any possibility of skin contact with liquids containing sulfuric acid. Eye protection should be splash proof goggles and a full face shield. If the possibility exists where an employee could be exposed to acid (eyes) then an eyewash fountain should be within the immediate work area.
Sulfuric Acid is not listed in the National Toxicology Program (NTP) Annual Report on carcinogens ahd has not been found to be a potential carcinogen in the International Agency for Research on· Cancer ( IAR,C) Monographs, or by OSHA.
wright Chemical Corporation
P. o. Box 402
Riegelwood, N. C. 28456
919-655-2263 Days
~19-655-2905 Weekends and Nights
Revised April 1986 Page 3
C
.
r 'ARCH
:,
•'•
·t,~ • I
.>ct: ' •f t --!.1' ·
.. ·~•! • '
HVAC 1 nc
'
' ., ! ·.
'
A
0
' ' '
ELECT
I
1, '~· \ . '
Ml:CH
'rr-,
D
CIVIL STRUC D I
I
I -l
,. \
.,.· . . '
• • ~ ...
---:=----t=
~--,::--......:c
A
0
ARCH HVAC
I
I
1/• . ""' 2. D ·o f'µ.,"i-
1 nc
•
WRRGHT CORPORA TOON
Dear Nei9hbors:
Please allow me to it1tt·odl,ce myself_ My r1ame is Thomas Wt·ight atid I war!:
with Wright Corporation located in Acme.
I war1t ta let Y □ll know tf1at we f1ave beet, made aware of tf,e dissatistactiot,
some neighbors have concerning □llr air emissions. We feel that it is □lir
responsibility to be a good. sate ,1eig~1bor and~ thet·efore. it is at1d wi 11 be
our goal to meet the expectations of tf1e people around which we live atid
work_
And 1 as a mear,s of showing our· good faitf·11 I want to list tf1e thir,gs we have
done and wi 11 be doing to make oL,r community a good place to live.
l. In 198E: we Plffchased over· JOO acr·es tram f~:aiser as additional land to
7'-.. ser·ve as a but fer. We have pl anted pine tt·ees on these lands to
incr·ease the ability of tf1e land to sf1elter you ft·om the sigf1ts at1d
sounds of our oper·ations.
' i
I \,
-I
2. We have installed addi.tional equipment in our waste tr·eatment pot1ds to
aid the biological action and reduce the offensive odors that can come
from these ponds it1 the summertime.
3. We wi 11 be increasin~ the height of the stack on our boiler and sulfuric
acid plant. This sf1ould give our emissior1s a wider dis~et·sion and
lessen the chance of impact on a neighbor's property_ Tf1is war!~ wi 11
be it1 progr·ess this summer· and shol,ld be finished it1 Novernber.
4. We wi 11 be installing a distillation column to remove chemical carry-
over from tf1e f1examine plant. This, combined with a sepat·ating l,t1it,
wi 11 enable LJS to remove valuable raw mater·ials and prodLict out of our
discf1arge water·_ This is scf·1eduled to be installed late this fall ar1d
finished in the winter of 1990.
5. We wi 11 be seeking the state of N. C. 's pennission to install pond
liners to protect our gr·out1d watet· supply from contamination. One
p □11d was lined last yeat· a11d we hope tl1at we can do ot1e this yeat· at1d
one ne~<t year.
6. We are even tryit1g to look better. We have restored the old
Presbyterian cf1urch as a commLinity bL,i lding and have located it on a
· pond on our property. We are plat1ting trees along our et1trance drive
and we are addit1g flowering trees to make our entrat1ce colorful al I
swnmet·_ And, lastly_. we at·e donating the land and making the
improvements necessary to relocate the Linsightly trash dump at the
intet·section of Gooseneck Road and Nor·thwest Road. This should be
completed within the· ne>::t 30 days_
P.O. BOX 9009 • WILMINGTON, N.C. 28402 • TELEPH_ONE 919-251-0234 • FAX [phone]
For· the past 106 years we f·1ave beet1 a t·1eighbor it1 tl·1is comrnu11ity, yet, we
feel tl1at we cat1 ar1d wi 11 become a better t1eighbor·_ To do tf1is we wi 11 t1eed
yoi_ff pc1tience and under·standin9_ Changes in e•=1uipment and oper·ations take
months to design_. or·det·, and instal 1. Please undet·stand that we wi 11 be
movir1g as quickly as possible on all the items I have listed.
I f1ave as!:ed tf1e state of Nor·tt1 Car·olir1a fat· their· assistat1ce in monitor·i11g
our· progt·ess and in assisting us it1 discovering our problems an~ the
soltitions to tf1ese pt·oblems. They wi 1 l be sper1ding time witf1 LIS tf1is summer·
to help tis set up a system to better monitor our· performance.
If YOll have ar1y qtiestions about our· company ot· what we ar·e tt·ying to do to
meet the wishes of our neighbor·s please do r1ot hesitate to call me
~-ersonally. My office numbet· in Wilmington is 251-0234. I can be often
reached in Acme at 655-2263.
We tr·uly wisf1 to be a good neighbor· at1d a good fr·ier1d. Tf~e changes tf1at we
are maki~g at·e very expensive (ovet· 1/2 mi ]lion dollars) yet, we feel tl1at
it is tf1e r·ight at1d most r1ecessary thing to do for tl1e commur1ity_ With some
har·d worl( and a little luck we feel we can look forward to being here for
ar1other· 106 years.
That1!, yoti fo1· taking tf,e _time to read tf1is long letter.
Sincerely~
WF:!CiHT COF:PORATION
~,tJ /i, I ~~ W,,u_jl[;p,,,__-....
Thomas H. Wright III
Vice Pt·es i dent
THWII I /p:s I
cc: State of Not·th Carolina
Division of Nattiral Resour·ces at1d
Commut1ity Development
7225 Wrightsville AvenlJe
Wi lmir1gton, NC 28403
' ' DRNus• Lu CORPORATION
1927 LAKESIDE PARKWAY
SUITE 61 /I
TUCK EA. GEOAGIA 30084
40"1-938-7710
June 22, 1989
Mr. Rick Shiver
Regional Hydrologist
North Carolina Dept. of Natural Resources
and Community Development
Division of Environmental Management
Groundwater Section
7225 Wrightsville Avenue
Wilmington, North Carolina 28403
Subject: Analytical Data for Wright Chemical Corporation,
Reigelwood North Carolina
Dear M,. Shiver:
•
C-586-6-9-177
WILMIHGl'OH RlU:<} . .JU. CYFf/C£
Please find enclosed the analytical data tables and sample location maps that were generated during
our investigation at Wright Chemical Corporation. When the draft report is completed, I will
forward a copy to you. If you have any questions or want to discuss any of the analytical data or
sample locations, please call me at NUS.
I'd also appreciate it if you would keep me posted on any further work your department requires
Wright Chemical to perform.
Very truly yours,
~t(~
Phillip flenderson
Project Manager
PH/gwn
Enclosures (2)
cc: Robert Morris, EPA Project Officer
Approved
• • DRAFT
TABLE 1
SAMPLE CODE DESCRIPTIONS AND LOCATIONS
SAMPLE CODE DESCRIPTION LOCATION/RATIONALE
WC-SS-01 Background Offsite/Establish background conditions
WC-SS-02 Onsite Empty Drum storage area/Identify source area
contaminants
WC-SS-03 On site Sulfuric acid tanks/Identify source area
contaminants
WC-LS-04 Onsite Former runoff area/Identify source area
contaminants
WC-LS-05 Onsite Former runoff area/Identify source area
contaminants
WC-LS-06 Onsite Former runoff area/Identify source area
contaminants
WC-SS-07 Onsite Formaldehyde Plant
WC-SS-09 Onsite 20-acre spray irrigation field/Identify source area
contaminants
WC-SS-10 Onsite 20-acre spray irrigation field/Identify source area
contaminants
WC-SD-01 Background Upstream, Livingston Creek/Establish background
conditions
WC-SD-02 Onsite Aeration Pond/Identify source area contaminants
WC-SD-03 Onsite Aeration Pond/Identify source area contaminants
WC-SD-04 Onsite Resin Pond/Identify source area contaminants
WC-SD-05 Onsite Resin Pond/Identify source area contaminants
WC-SD-06 Onsite Outfall Pond/Identify source area contaminants
WC-SD-07 Onsite Equalization Pond/Identify source area
contaminants
WC-SD-OB Onsite Equalization Pond/Identify source area
contaminants
WC-SD-09 Downgradient Livingston Creek/Determine if contaminants have
migrated into surface water
WC-SD-10 Downgradient Livingston Creek/Determine if contaminants have
migrated into surface water
• • DRAFT
TABLE 1
SAMPLE CODE DESCRIPTIONS AND LOCATIONS
SAMPLE CODE DESCRIPTION LOCA Tl ON/RATIONALE
WC-SD-11 Downgradient Tributary of Livingston Creek/Determine if
contaminants have migrated into surface water
WC-SD-12 Onsite Pond in 10-acre spray field/Identify source are
contaminants
WC-MW-01 Background U pgradient/10-acre spray field
WC-MW-02 Onsite 20-acre spray field
WC-MW-03 Onsite 20-acre spray field
WC-MW-04 Onsite 10-acre spray field
WC-MW-05 Downgradient Near chloropicrin plant
WC-MW-06 Downgradient Near aeration pond
WC-MW-07 Downgradient Near acid equalization pond
WC-MW-09(D) Onsite Deep production well/Determine if contaminants
have migrated to lower aquifer
WC-PW-01 Offsite Nearest sh al low private well
DRAFT
TABLE 2
Temp pH Sample Code Depth of Well Water Level ·c Conductivity Comments • WC-MW-01 34.5 ft. 25.5ft. 19 5.83 -Upgradient of 10-acre spray field
WC-MW-02 31 ft. 16.5ft. 12 6.70 744 20-acre spray field
WC-MW-03 13 ft. 2.5 ft. 10 6.85 640 20-acre spray field
,
WC-MW-04 29. 5 ft. 18.5 ft. 15 6.30 2190 10-acresprayfield. Watercloudy,
yellow-brown color
WC-MW-OS 13 ft. 7 ft. 15 7.0 32.50 Downgradient of chloropicrin plant
WC-MW-06 21 ft. 12.5 ft 16 9.24 5350 Downgradient of Aeration pond
WC-MW-07 14 ft. 6.25 ft. 14 -

-
Downgradient of acid equalization
pond
WC-MW-09 180 ft. -17 7.83 -Deep production well • WC-PW-01 32 ft. 19 ft. 18 5.6 92.8 Background private well
No data available
•
•
Background
PARAMETERS ( ug/1) IIC-Pll-01
ALUMINUM 86
ANTIMONY -
ARSENIC -
BARIUM 68
BERYLLIUM -
CADMIUM -
CALC !UM 1600
CHROMIUM -.
COBALT -
COPPER 430
IRON -
LEAD -
MAGNESIUM 2100
MANGANESE 9
MERCURY -
NICKEL -
POTASSIUM -
SODIUM 12,000
VANADIUM -
ZINC -
CYANIDE -
TABLE 3
SUMMARY OF INORGANIC ANALYTICAL RESULTS
GROUNDWATER SAMPLES
WRIGHT CHEMICAL CORPORATION
RIEGELWOOD, COLUMBUS, NORTH CAROLINA
Upgradient 20-Acre Spray Field Ons ite
llfC-IIW-01 llfC-11111-02 llfC-11111-03 WC-11111-04 WC-NW-05
34,000 45,000 8800 120,000 18,000
---130JN -
39JN 35JN -62JN 30JN
110 140 90 110 48
10 --9 5
-----
10,000 370,000 97,000 54,000 69,000
45 210 42 86 24
28JN 14JN 8 51JN 14
-----
47,000 63,000 15,000 240,000 21,000
24J 26J 9J 75J 18J
3400 31,000 30,000 14,000 9700
150 490 210 1300 380
-1. 3 ---
30 50 -35 29
2900 18,000 4900 2 I, 000 97,000
8100 52,000 32,000 91,000 120,000
90 130 28 380 1200
-210 -170 300
---20J -
Material analyzed for but not detected above minimum quantitation limit
J Estimated value
N Presumptive evidence of presence of material
DRAFT
Deep
Product ion
Oowngradient Well
llfC-NW-06 WC-NW-07 WC-NW-09
59,000 860,000 -
---
7 1J N 1800JN -
100 77 -
24 33 -
-10 -
5500 310,000 18,000
86 420 -
150JN 77JN -
-1100 -
250,000 390,000 -
43J 720J -
6100 69,000 15,000
1200 4200 -
---
52 110 -
19,000 150,000 26,000
85,000 650,000 520,000
250 1700 -
2 70 4100 -
---
•
•
Back.ground
PARAMETERS (ug/1) WC-PW-01
PURGEABLE COMPOUNDS
METHYLENE CHLORIDE NA
CARBON DISULFIDE NA
1,1-DICHLOROETHANE NA
1,1-DICHLOROETHENE (TOTAL) NA
CHLOROFORM NA
METHYL ETHYL KETONE NA
TRICHLOROETHENE NA
BENZENE NA
METHYL BUTYL KETONE NA
TOLUENE NA
ETHYL BENZENE NA
THIOBISMETHANE NA
EXTRACTABLE COMPOUNDS
PHENOL -
NAPHTHALENE -
TABLE 4
SUMMARY OF ORGANIC ANALYTICAL RESULTS
GROUNDWATER SAMPLES
WRIGHT CHEMICAL CORPORATION
RIEG ELWOOD, COLUMBUS, NORTH CAROLINA
Upgradient 20-Acre Spray Field Onsite
IIC-1111-01 WC-1111-02 WC-1111-03 WC-Mll-04
----
11 -B -
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
14 --5
----
----
-NA --
-NA --
Material analyzed for but not detected above minimum quantitation limit J Estimated value
N Presumptive evidence of presence of material
NA Not arialyzed for
DRAFT
Deep
Production
Do•ngradient Well
WC-MW-05 WC-MW-06 WC-1111-07 WC-Mll-09
----
--470 -
1J ---
B ---
----
--6!J -
JJ ---
IJ ---
----
5 -6 -
--0. JJ -
--BOJN -
-140 --
36 ---
•
•
Background
PARAMETERS ( ug/1) WC-PW-01
METHANETHIOL -
TRIOXANE -
CAPROLACTAM -
DIMETHOXYMETHANE -
.DIMETHOXYPROPANOL -
METHYLHEXANOIC ACID -
INDOLE -
PHENYLPRDPANEDIOIC ACID -
IMETHYLINDOLE -
DIHYOROMETHYLINDDLE -
TRITHIANE -
TETRATHIEPANE -
LENTHIONINE -
~XYBISBEN2ENE -
UNIDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS/NO. -
TABLE 4
SUMMARY OF ORGANIC ANALYTICAL RESULTS
GROUNDWATER SAMPLES
WRIGHT CHEMICAL CORPORATION
RIEG ELWOOD, COLUMBUS, NORTH CAROLINA
Upgradient 20-Acre Spray Field Ons ite
liC-MW-01 WC-IIW-02 WC-MW-03 WC-MW-04
-NA --
-NA 200JN )OOJN
-NA 30JN -
-NA --
-NA --
-NA --
-NA --
-NA --
-NA --
-NA --
-NA --
-NA --
-NA --
-NA --
-NA 40J/l 100J/3
Material analyzed for but not detected above minimum quantitation limit
J Estimated value
N · Presumptive evidence of presence of material
NA Not analyzed for
DRAFT
Deep
Production
Downgradient Well
WC-MW-05 WC-MW-06 WC-MW-07 WC-MW-09
----
700JN 1000JN 3000JN -
----
90JN 200JN 200JN -
50JN IOOOJN --
-lOOOJN --
-20JN --
-BOOJN --
-60JN --
-BOJN lOOJN -
--200JN -
--lOOOJN -
--BOJN -
300JN ---
lOOOJ/6 5000J/10 9000J/12 -
•
•
Background
PARAMETERS (mg/kg) IIC-SS-01
ALUMINUM 3100J
ANTIMONY -
ARSENIC 2.5JN
BARIUM ,12
BERYLLIUM -
CADMIUM -
CALC !UM 1200
CHROMIUM 5.3
COBALT -
COPPER -
IRON 1900
LEAD !OJ
MAGNESIUM 190
MANGANESE 36J
MERCURY .
NICKEL -
POTASSIUM -
SODIUM -
VANADIUM 9.8
ZINC -
CYANIDE -
TABLE 5
SUMMARY OF INORGANIC ANALYTICAL RESULTS
SURFACE SOIL AND LEACH A TE SAMPLES
WRIGHT CHEMICAL CORPORATION
RIEGELWOOD, COLUMBUS, NORTH CAROLINA
Storage
Area Acid Plant Former Runoff Area
IIC--SS-02 IIC-SS-03 IIC-LS-04 WC-LS-05 IIC-LS-06
3900J 540J 3800J 2300J 1600J
-----
16JN -4.3JN 4.4JN -
2 1 21 7.7 13 4.3
-----
-----
9300 5300 11,000 1300 13,000
5 -7 4.1 4. I
-----
8 ----
7100 5400 13,000 4500 1700
330J 83J 15J 18J 7.4J
130 3 1 150 180 _ 120
BJ 11J I I J 13J 14J
-1. 4J --.
-----
----.
-7100 190 110 100
-4 1 7 9.5 6.9
-58J 31J -.
-----
Material analyzed for but not detected above minimum quantitation limit J Estimated value
N Presumptive evidence of presence of material
DRAFT
Formaldehyde
Plant 20-Acre Spray Field
IIC-SS-07 IIC-SS-09 IIC-SS-10
1900J 4800J 2800J
---
3 SJN 4.5JN -
9.6 9.8 5.8
---
---
11,000 150 100
9.9 3.6 1.8
---
. . -
3900 1800 1400
17J BJ 4.3J
140 100 96
[6J 5J 6.BJ
---
11 . -
---
. 130 -
11 8.1 6.5
17J --
0 .89 0.89 0.85
•
•
Background
TABLE 6
SUMMARY OF ORGANIC ANALYTICAL RESULTS
SURFACE SOIL AND LEACHATE SAMPLES
WRIGHT CHEMICAL CORPORATION
RIEGELWOOD, COLUMBUS, NORTH CAROLINA
Storage
Area Acid Plant Former Runoff Area
PARAMETERS ( ug/kg) IIC-SS-01 IIC-SS-02 IIC-SS-03 IIC-LS-04 IIC-LS-05 IIC-LS-06
PURGEABLE COMPOUNDS
1,2-DICHLOROETHENE (TOTAL) ----
CHLOROFORM 12 43 33 19
METHYL BUTYL KE TONE ----
TOLUENE -940 550 -
METHANETHIOL ---20JN .
METHOXYPROPENE ---.-
UNIDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS/NO. 30J/3 --I OOJ /1
EXTRACTABLE COMPOUNDS
PHENOL ----
BENZYL ALCOHOL ----
( 3-AND/QR 4-)METHYLPHENOL ----
BENZOIC ACID 1300J ---
NAPHTHALENE ----
HEXACHLOROBENZENE --610 -
FLUORANTHENE --I !OJ 170J
PYRENE --45J 11 OJ
Material analyzed for but not detected above minimum quantitation limit
Estimated value
N Presumptive evidence of presence of material
--
--
--
-140
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
DRAFT
Formaldehyde
Plant 20-Acre Spray field
IIC-SS-07 IIC-SS-09 IIC-SS-10
---
---
l300J --
---
---
3000JN --
2000J/I --
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
•
•
Background
TABLE 6
SUMMARY OF ORGANIC ANALYTICAL RESULTS
SURFACE SOIL AND LEACHATE SAMPLES
WRIGHT CHEMICAL CORPORATION
RIEGELWOOD, COLUMBUS, NORTH CAROLINA
Storage
Area Acid Plant Forraer Runoff Area PARAMETERS (ug/kg) WC-SS-01 WC-SS-02 WC-SS-03 WC-LS-04 WC-LS-05 WC-LS-06
BENZO(A)ANTHRACENE ----
CHRYSENE ----
METHYLHEXANAM!NE 10,000JN ---
BENZALDEHYDE 4000JN ---
BENZACETON!TR!LE !OOOJN ---
HEXADECANOIC ACID 2000JN -900JN -
METHENAM!NE ---10, OOOJN
UNIDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS/NO. !0,0DOJ/6 3000J/2 2000J/3 6000J/2
PESTIC!DE\PCB COMPOUNDS
D!ELDRIN -11J --
4,4'-DDT (P,P'-DDT) -12J --
PCB-1254 (AROCLOR 1254) --4100 -
J
N
Material analyzed for but not detected above minimum quantitation limit Estimated value
Presumptive evidence of presence of material
. --
--
--
--
--
--
-BOOOJN
SOOOJ/6 -
--
--
--
DRAFT
Formaldehyde
Plant 20-Acre Spray Field
WC-SS-07 WC-SS-09 wc-ss-10
---
---
---
---
---
---
BOOOJN 600DJN -
30,00QJ/3 10.000J/2 -
---
---
---
I
PARAMETERS Background ·Aeration Pond
(ag/kg) IIC-SD-01 IIC-SD-02 WC-SD-03
ALUMINUM 13,000J 4!00J 3000J
ANTIMONY ---
ARSENIC 9.4JN 6 9JN -
BARIUM 38 6. 1 -
BERYLLIUM ---
CADMIUM ---
CALCIUM 3600 110 110
CHROMIUM 16 9. 1 4.5
COBALT 11 --
COPPER ---
IRON 13,000 4800 3500
LEAD 37J 16J 4. IJ
MAGNESIUM 600 1 10 74
"4ANGANESE 43J t!J !OJ
MERCURY -. .
ICKEL ---
POTASSIUM ---
SELENIUM --r -
SODIUM -460 110
THALLIUM ---
VANADIUM 32 13 9.1
ZINC ! !OJ . -
CYANIDE -0.94 -
TABLE 7
SUMMARY OF INORGANIC ANALYTICAL RESULTS
SEDIMENT SAMPLES
WRIGHT CHEMICAL CORPORATION
RIEGELWOOD COLUMBUS NORTH CAROLINA . .
Outfall
Resin Pond Pond Equalization Pond
IIC-SD-04 WC-SD-05 IIC-SD-06 WC-SD-07 WC-SD-08
3300J 1200J 5400J 2800J 6300J
15J ----
5. !JN 2. IJN 4. 7JN -9.3JN
12 7 . 1 6.8 8.8 21
-----
-----
1100 110 500 1400 5600
5.9 5.5 4.4 8. 7 30
-. -. 3.8
----46
6000 1400 6700 6800 16,000
7. IJ 1.9J 5.4J 81 160
95 62 110 150 380
5.3J 3. !J 7.7J 29J tOOJ
-. ---
----14
-----
----.
----760
---. .
15 8.5 11 10 41
--46J -160J
-----
... J
N
Material analyzed for but not detected above minimum quantitation limit
Estimated value
Presumptive evidence of presence of material
DRAF
10-Acre
Spray Field Downgradient
WC-SD-12 IIC-SD-09 WC-SD-10 WC-SD-11
1400J 1900J 900J 19,000J
-14JN --
-110JN -17JN
11 340 -66
---4.4
-11 --
430 560 1100 500
1.4 10 -88
. 4. tJN -5.6JN
. 61 -81
880 45,000 1500 33,000
6. 7 J 1 IOOJ 6. !J 150J
97 89 76 130
14J 4.6J 8.8J 4.9J
-1. 6J --
---14
-1400 . 1800
-5.4J --
. 110 -150
-. -.
3.3 30 3. 7 1600
-4100J 65J 61J
-0. 94 -.
Background Aeration
PARAMETERS (ug/kg) WC-S0-01 IIC-S0-02
EABLE COMPOUNDS
-~YLENE CHLORIDE 47 -
CARBON DISULFIDE --
TOLUENE 2 70 150
THIOBISMETHANE -20JN
BIPHENYLOL --
ME THANE TH IOL --
PINENE --
CAMPHENE --
METHYL(METHLETHYL)BENZENE --
METHOXYPROPENE --
LIMONENE --
.ISBENZENE --
ENTIFIED COMPOUNDS/NO. 20J/1 -,....
EXTRACTABLE COMPOUNDS
PHENOL---
BENZYL ALCOHOL 1BOJ -
(3-AND/OR 4-)METHYLPHENOL -1400
TABLE 8
SUMMARY OF ORGANIC ANALYTICAL RESULTS
SEDIMENT SAMPLES
WRIGHT CHEMICAL CORPORATION
RIEGELWOOD, COLUMBUS, NORTH CAROLINA
.
Outfall
Pond Resin Pond Pond Equalization Pond
WC-S0-03 WC-S0-04 WC-S0-05 WC-S0-06 WC-S0-07 WC-S0-08
------
-IJ 6J --40
--210 g 1 -120
----IOOOJN lOOOJN
---BJN --
----200JN 200JN
----100JN -
----50JN -
----20JN -
------
----70JN -
---10JN --
6000J/9 ----IOOJ/2
-----1200J
-----2600J
-----41000
Material analyzed for but not detected above minimum quantitation limit J Estimated value
N Presumptive evidence of presence of material
C Confirmed by GCMS
DRAF.
JO-Acre
Spray
Field Do•ngradient
WC-S0-12 WC-S0-09 WC-S0-10 WC-SD-II
----
-15 --
----
----
----
---
---
----
----
----
---
. ----
----
----
----
----
TABLE 8
SUMMARY OF ORGANIC ANALYTICAL RESULTS
SEDIMENT SAMPLES
WRIGHT CHEMICAL CORPORATION
RIEGELWOOD, COLUMBUS, NORTH CAROLINA
Outfall
Back.ground Aeration Pond Resin Pond Pond Equalization Pond
PARAMETERS (ug/kg) WC-SD-01 WC-S0-02 WC-SD-03 WC-SD-04 WC-SD-05
S'XACHLOROBENZENE -----
r. RANTHENE 190J ----
ENE 130J ----
BENZO(A)ANTHRACENE -----
CHRYSENE -----
METHYLHEXANAMINE -----
HEXADECANOIC ACID -----
METHENAMINE --30,000JN 10,000JN 5000JN
TETRATHIEPANE -2000JN -!OOOJN -
LENTHIDNINE -----
HEXAHYDROTRJMETHYLTRJAZINE -6000JN ---
TETRAMETHYLPIPERIDINONE --2000JN --
ETHENYLNAPTHALENE ---2000JN -
IDECANOIC ACID -----
ADECANOIC ACID -----
81S(HYDROXYETHYL) -----
DODECANAMIDE
PIPERIDONE -----
Material analyzed for but not detected above minimum quantitation limit
Estimated value
N Presumptive evidence of presence of material
C Confirmed by GCMS
WC-SD-06 WC-SD-07 WC-SD-08
---
---
-3800 -
-1800 -
-5300 -
---
-100,000JN 200,000JN
-20,000JN -
---
---
---
---
---
-30,000JN 30,000JN
-10,000JN 100,000JN
--10,000JN
--6000JN
DRAF
10-Acre
Spray
Field Oowngradient
WC-SD-12 WC-SD-09 WC-SD-to '-'C-SD-li
-420J --
----
----
----
----
10,000JN 10,000JN --
2000JN 4000JN -!OOOJN
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
TABLE 8
SUMMARY OF ORGANIC ANALYTICAL RESULTS
SEDIMENT SAMPLES
WRIGHT CHEMICAL CORPORATION
RIEGELWOOD, COLUMBUS, NORTH CAROLINA
Outfall
Back.ground Aeration Pond Resin Pond Pond Equalization Pond PARAIIETERS ( ug/kg) WC-S0-01 WC-S0-02 WC-SD-03 WC-S0-04 WC-SD-05
THIE PANE -----
-d!SBENZENE 4000JN -
UNIDENTIFIEO COMPOUNDS/NO. 300,000J/!2 40,000J/13 60,000J/9 10,000J/5 5000J/5
PESTICIDE\PCB COMPOUNDS
BETA-BHC -----
OELTA-BHC -----
GAMMA-BHC ( LINOANE) -----
OIELDRIN -----
4,4'-0DE (P,P' -DOE) -----
4,4'-DOO (P,P'-000) 33J ----
4,4'-00T ( P, P' -DOT) -----
ME THOXYCHLOR -----
·A-CHLORDANE /2 -----
Material analyzed for but not detected above minimum quantitation limit Estimated value
N Presumptive evidence of presence of material
C Confirmed by GCMS
WC-S0-06 WC-SD-07 WC-SD-08
--9000JN
---
-200.000J/12 200,000J/9
---
---
---
---
---
---
-120 -
-410 -
---
DRAF
10-Acre
Spray
Field Oowngradient
WC-SD-12 WC-S0-09 WC-S0-10 we-so-1:
----
----
5000J/4 10,000J/7 5000J/2 7000J/3
-52N --
-190 --
-I I 0 --
29 34 --
23 ---
160 I I 0 --
2800[ 150 --
----
-IJJ --
yJ ' , , 6 Y'l 1-CJ, ~ ; "-"'" t • •
Incident Narre .$?; 3 ;;___,
legion/0:7J.nty u.,; Ro / Co L.,~ l.,,, <: Groonc\,,,a ter Incident Fi le # 3 'ii 3 cl....., Ranking furformed by JJ-:Tn,. lo✓ Cate lo-?..\-'fi
I.
II.
V
NOO'IH CAROLINA
GRCllN™ATER CCNI'N1INATICN INCIDENT MANN»IENT
SITE PRicmTY RANKING SYSTE1-I
D'MINENT HAZARD ASSES~
A. Explosion -free product in confined areas or vapor phase product detected at or above 20% of the lc,,.,er explosive limit; awrrd 50 points total
B. Fire -free product subject to ignition in exposed areas su:::h as surface water inpoundrrents, streams, excavations, etc.; award 50 points total
EXPC6URE ASS~
A. Contaminated Drinking Water Surr,lies
1. Private, darestic "'3.ter
surr,ly well containin::J substances
in concentrations exceeding Class GA underground water quality
standards; award 10 points per well
2. Public or institutiooal "'3.ter
surr,ly well containin::J substances in concentrations exceeding Class GA underground water quality standards; award 30 points per well
3. Exceedenoes of Class W3-l surface "'3.ter quality standards as a result of ground.vater discharge; award 20 points per surface W'lter body irrpacted
4. If a water surr,ly well identified in items I;r.A.1 and II.A.2 cannot be replaced by an existing public water surr,ly source requiring hook-up only; award. a&:li ticc1a1 10 points per irreplaoeable well
....
Points
Awarded
()
__Q_
c) --
()
0
0
c:
)
i
" ,,
l.
' ,.
• • GIi Cbntamination Incident Managerrent
Site Priority Ranking System
page 2
B. Threat To lhcontami.nated Drinking Water Supplies
c.
1.
2.
3.
Private, d:xrestic \oater supply ,;,ell
located within 1500 feet downgradient
of contaminant source: a'l-.0.rd 10 points per 1»ell
Public or institutional \oater supply
1»ell located within 1/2 mile downgradient
of contaminant source: a-rd 15 points per 1»ell
Raw surface \oater intake for public
water su,:ply located within
1/2 mile downgradient of contaminant source: award 5 points per water
supply system
4. If any well identified in items II.B.l and II.B.2 is located within 250 feet
of contaminant source; award additional
20 points total.
Vapor Phase Exposure
1. Product vapors detected in inhabitable
building (s); award 30 points total
2. Product vapors detected in other confined
areas (uninhabitable buildings, se..er lines, utility vaults, etc.); _award 5 points total
III. CXNI'AMINANT HAZARD ASSESs-IBNT (cternical groups are categorized based on tax:icity, rrd:lility and persistence in the envirornrent) • Evaluate ·the rrost hazarcbus sul::6tances detected and select only one of the follCMi.ng:
A. Award 30 points total if contaminants detected
are identified with any of the follCMi.ng groups:
1. Aranatic (Benzene) A::ids
2. An:xnatic H~oca:r:bons (Benzene Derivatives) 3. Sulfonated Hydrocarbons
4. Halogenated H~rbons
5. Alkaloids
6. Anilines
7. Phenols
8. Aldehydes
9. Ketones
10. Organic Sulfur Cbrrpounds (Sulfides,
/.Ercaptans)
11. Organaretallic Cbrrpounds
0
0
30
" /'. ,'
,.
• • GI Cbntarnination Incident Management
Site Priority Ranking System
Page 3 -
B.
12. Cyanides
13. Esters
14. ~tal Salts, Including Heavy 1-Etals
Award 20 points total if contaminants detected
are identified with any of the following groups:
1. Aliphatic (Fatty) Acids
2. Alcohols
3. Aliphatic Hydr=arl:ions (Petroleun Derivative)
4 . Pyridines
5. Thiocyanides
6. Mineral and ~tal Acids
7. Mineral and 1-Etal Bases
8. Oxides
9. sulfides
C. Award 10 points total if contaminants detected
are irentified with any of the follc:M.ng groups:
1. Aliphatic Amines and Their Salts
2. Sugars and Cellulose
3. Carbon and Graphite
IV. SOORCEASSESs-lENT
A. Free product thickness of > 1/4 inch
retected on water table in-observation
or nonitoring =11; award 20 points
total
B. Contaminated Soil (select only one
anS1<.er)
C.
1.
2.
Soil saturated with product
(saturation determined by release of
free liquid upon carpaction of a soil
sarrple by hand pressure);
award 10 points total
Soil exhibiting organic vapor content
above 100 pµn as rreasured by organic
vapor or volatile organic detection
equiµnent; award 5 points total
lhcontrolled or lhabated Pr:inary Source (incltxling
d1.111p5ites, st=kpiles, lagcons, land appli-
cations, septic tanks, landfills, undergramd
and above ground s_torage tanks, etc.)
,.
'
0
()
0
• • G;/ Cbntamination Incirent M'lnagerrent
Site Priority.Ranking System
Page 4
1. Suspected or confirrred source
remains in active use and =ntinues to
receive r= product, wastewater or
solid 1,0ste; aW'!rd 20 points per source
2. Active use of suspected or confinred
source has been discontinued or source
was caused by a one-tine release of
product or 1,0ste, however, source
continues to release product or
=ntaroinants into the environrrent;
award 10 points per source
V. ENVIRCNMENI'AL V1JLNERABILITY ASSESS>lENT
A.
B.
Vertical Contaminant Migration -Literature or ~11 logs· indicate that no confining layer is
present .al:xJve bedrock or above ~nty feet below land surface; aW'!rd 10 points total
Horizontal Contaminant Migration -i:ata or observations indicate that no discharge points
or aquifer dis=ntinuities exist betw>en the
sc,urce. and .. the nearest downgradient .drinking water sui::ply; award 10 points total
C. Hydraulic Gradient Is Ieterroined By (select
only one ans,ier):
D.
1. Calculations based on grouna,,ater level
rreasurerrents; a=d 10 points total
2. Observation of significant recharge/discharge.
features in the vicinity of contaminant source
and local topograµric features; award 5 points total
3. Observation of local topograµric features
only; aW'!rd 0 points
Existing Groun&-,ater Quality
1. Analytical test (s) perfumed on groundW'!ter
sanple (s) obtained fran site confirm presence
of substances in conoentratioris exceeding Class GI'\ underground water quality standards; award
10 points total
2. Source(s) identified in Section IV constitute
the only known source (s) of oontarnination
resulting in exposure or potential exposure
irentified in Section II; a=d 10 points total
TOI'AL POINTS AWARDEil
0
r>
/0
/0
qo
• • INCIDENT MANAGEMENT SITE ST,'.\TUS hwPORT
INFORMATION REQUIREMENTS
1. Incident Number
2. Site Priority Ranking Score
3. Phase
DISCOVERY (DI)
4. Complaint or 24-hour leak report received
by regional office
ASSESSMENT (AS)
5. Preliminary investigation and/or
confirmation of leak report conducted by
regional office and pollution incident/UST
leak reporting form submitted to central
office.
RESPONSE (RE)
6. Field investigation started to identify
source(s) and responsible party(s)
FOLLOW-UP (FU)
7. NQY is sued to .. responsible party ( s) by
_iegional office·
f".':i·_--:, .~ ....::. ', ~·:•, ,:,_1+-·;,. ~-5-,;,;,:.: ~'.\,-~.D-_\.".,r,·;.,, ~-0.:,,i_,<.; ~0·r.,·.~:_:,;:·:-,_:-c:r::.·,~ .1;• S~;:~•-..:,.; _ ., , .. ·.,
removal., etc .. ) . by responsible party
9. · Twenty ( 20) day corrective action report
received by regional office· (UST sites)
10. Forty five (45) day initial site
characterization report received by
regional office (UST sites)
11. Forty five (45) day free product r~~~rt
received by regional office (UST sites)
12. Site "under ·control"
13. Tank data submitted
14. Enforcement report _submitted by regional
office
15. Special order issued by EMC
REMEDIAL-ACTION (RA)
16. Corrective action plan approved by regional
office
17. Public notide published
18. Public meeting held
19 .. SOC stgned.by Diiector/EMC
CLOSE OUT (CO)
20. Cleanup completed -no further action
necessary
21. Close out report submitted to central office
DATE
**For further clirifl.cation of
document entitled:''E~planation of
phase terminology,: see
Phase NomenclatU:t:"e'1·.·. ~--: .
I· ,
attached
NORTH CAROIJNA DEPAR1'l-ENT OF NA T\.RAL RE_a,JRCES AND COMMJNITY OEVEL.0Pl,ENT
DIVISION Of' ENVIRONMENTAL MANA<lEll9-GAOUNDWATSl SECTION
P.O. aox 27887 -RALEIGH.N.C. 27811, PHONE [phone]
WELL CONSTRUCTION RECORD
DRILLING CONTRACTOR ___:Fc:i=shh.u:n===e=--=Dr=il=l=in::.::g"-'In=c::.::• __
DRILLER REGISTRATION NUMBER __ 9..:.5_l _____ _
1. WELL LOCATION: (Show sketch of the location below)
I FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
ad. No. ______ Serial No. ___ _
Lat. ______ Long. ____ Pc __
Minor Basin ____________ _
Basin Code ____________ _
Header Ent. _______ GW-1 Ent. __
ST A TE WELL CONSTRUCTION
PERMIT NUMBER: 23-0092-\'M-0043
Nearest Town: Riegel~ North Carolina County: _.....:.Co=l=umbus==-------------
S.R. 1818
(Road, Community, or Subdivision and Lot No.)
2. OWNER Wright eonioration
ADDRESS Acne Station
(Street or Route NoJ
Riegel~ OC 28456
City or Town State Zip Code
3. DATE DRILLED 12-4-97 USE OF WELL rronitoring
4. TOTAL DEPTH 11 ft CUTTINGS COLLECTED !xi Yes O No
5. DOES WELL REPLACE EXISTING WELL? 0 Yes lie) No
6. STATIC WATER LEVEL: _ __:5c.__ FT. 0 above TOP OF CASING,
CX below
TOP OF CASING IS---''--FT. ABOVE LAND SURF ACE.
7. YIELD (gpm): _____ METHOD OF TEST ______ _
B. WATER ZONES (depth): _______________ _
9. CHLORINATION: Type Amount
10. CASING: Wall Thickness
Depth Diameter or Weight/Ft. Material
From 0 To 5 Fl. 2 in. sch 40 PVC
From To Ft
From To Ft.
11. GROUT:
Depth Material Method
From 0 To 3 Ft. lean grout poured
From To Ft.
12. SCREEN:
Depth Diameter Slot Size Material
From 5 To ll Ft. 2 in. 0.01 in. PVC
Fr:,m To Ft. in. In.
From To Ft. In. In.
13. GRAVEL PACK:
Depth Size Material
From 4 Toll Fl. =rse saoo
From To Ft.
•.. REMARKS: Bentonite seal fran 3 to 4 ft.
Depth DRILLING LOG
From To Formation Description
0 -5 ft Organic rich fine sand,
possibly fill
5 -9 ft fine to rredium sarrl
J.o ~n ft Gray fine sandy silty clay
If additional space is needed use back of form.
LOCATION SKETCH
(Show direction and distance 1rom at least two State Roads,
or 'oth8r map reference points)
Well #8
See attached topographic IIBp
I DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS WELL WAS CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH 15 NCAC 2C. WELL CONSTRUCTION
STANDARDS, AND THAT A COPY OF THIS RECORD HAS BE PROVIDED TO THE WELL OWNER.
DATE
GW-1 Revised 11/84 S mil original to Division of Environmental Management and copy to well owner.
•
COUNTY L(.)I l 1 •\ l~U'S:,.
QUAD NO. n \ \ -·-:h\. l , -SERIAL NO, l"'i r-111<,
REPORT TO: (circle one)
ARO, WSRO, MRO, FRO, WaRO,
@9~ RRO, Ahoskie FO,
OTHER.~--------
•
N, C, DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES
& COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DEM I
GROUNDWATER FIELD/LAB FORM
•
PURPOSE: (circle one) baseline, pollution monitor, other < r,_...., DI ,,...'\.t 1-,, 1""" fl!V\_ ':> I I(.,. A, J(_)f 1
DATE COLLECTED & ' 2. / -[5 'I Time / }>-( ,,.. By /11. ,;./tJ~~~ i~ Location ... or site .., "\ n ._,,
UB NUMBER c-tf<ti
DATE REC'D o-~ d, -/f'-J
REC'D BY, _________ I
DATA ENTRY BY
DATA REPORTED
;.,; :
Description of sampling point C n t .L <"" l T ·, C> ,-f"l rl.rl t.~4:(~(i~.:./..<f-7[.,;./ t~ ~ • ... Sampled interval,_-":,C.~0:'-e· _--_,•..:"-::....'...:..r_,,__ 41 _ _,,_,_, .,_,.___,,, <.v U t ~ •
Remarks f'. (1. nc )X 7 l C-. ?AAt;~ <C\t<'.:ll-G-.t...t.... .O·JA-.:,
(pumping time, air temp, etc,)
Q
Field Analysis By:_/,~')~/~-~"~· _/_l_,-7~y~,;~/~-,~-Lat •--~'~A=-,,~-~n~•~--,~•~•~ ___ Long ,,_·__,,c,f.-lc,_,lc,r7_,___C.:.,,_">"-''--'-· _,_1 ____ _
tH._~S~-~? __ ~ ____ Sp~t. Cond .. __ ,,?:;_;c<.:_-' _____ r!:p .. __ .cl---'7 __ ',-'-------''0-'c'-__ )d'6r. __ _,Ae_/c.=.•..:'ec-..:/ _ __cAPPtarance / / /',,,,, L-
V -<,,/, ,, ,, /I · 7 ,/ Taste, ____ _
Lab Analysis
v' 1 Alkalinity to pH 4,5 P00410
,f Alkalinity, Hydro~ide P71830
v Carbonate P00445
,r Biearb&rra"te P00440
v' pH value (\.nen analyzed) P00400
Arsenic {D)· POlOOO
v' Carbon dioxide P00405
,I ChloTide tD) P00940
Color (True) POOOBO
~7 "!Ell
c<, I mg(l
-,< I !!!S/1
,::} mg/1
,:;~~units
ug/1
I/,, mg/1
'i( !!!BU
units
I/
v'
v
I/
Ag-Silver (D)
Al-Aluminum (D)-
Ba-Barium (D),
Ca Calcium (D)
Cd-Cadmium (D)
Cr-Chromium (D)
Cu-Copper (D)
Fe-Iron (D)-
Hg-Mercury
P01075 ug/1 BOD P00310 mg[!
P01106 <-/1)() ug/1 COD P00341 /1
P01005 ugll Coliform (Fecal MF) 1>31616 /lOOml
P00915 ,/ Coliform (total MF) P31505 ..: I /lOOml
PO!D25 ug/1 y TOC P00680 "" .,--mg/1 ,.,
P01030 ug/1 Turbidity P82079 NTU
P01040 In 70 ug/1 V Ammonia (as Ni torgen) (D)~-P00612 G {)/ !!!811
P01046 :)I)(') ug/1 v Kj eldahl (as Nitrogen)' (D)· P00623 n. I mg/1
P71900 usll I/ Nitrate+ Nitrite (as Nitrogen) (D)· P00631 I ? mg/1 ·--Cyanide P00720
"H • (D) Dissolved solids P70301
mg{l
_:J mg{l v
,{
Li-Lithium (D)
Mg-Magnesium -(D)·
P01130
P00925
ug/1
, /nO mg/1
V Phosphorus, total as P (D)·
Dissolved Solids -cond. meter
P00666 /) / mg/1
P70304 mg/1
I/ Fluoride (D) P00951 ~ n. I mg/1
v' llartlne&s (as CaC03) (D) P00900 _;J (; mg/1
,,,, Hardness (.non-carbonate) (D) P00902 ,~ mg/1
MBAS (D) P38260 mg/1
I/ Phenol "(D) P34466 «: ;:;--ug/1
,I Silica (D) P00955 . "'? mg/1
I/ Sulfate .(D) P00946 <_"'-mg/1
" Specific Cond, P000941./-:2 UMHOS'/cm
·.
GW-54 Revised 1/12/82
~
I/
Mn-Manganese .(D) P01056
Na Sodium (D) P00929
Pb-Lead (D) P01049 v
Other Analyses:, __________ _
-''--''-'--' .,_, -''C:''-''-'"'--'-'-"'-'-::.,_n_.!_ __ _:<:::::::._,_, ,_/\,_,,_• _ _,r>ccYJ Cl /~ , '7
"I /jl) ug/1
v
../ Zn-Zinc (D) P01090 , "?0 ug/1 ·
. I'.? ms/1
~•C.''-'--' -'-'-'''-'-' _,,_,Tc_•'-'~1,._-,_,_ ____ _,___i '-' -'~--'----"-i-rf q 1~
'-'-'--'----=----'--'"--"----"-'c>-rf/o-/L v K-Potassium (D) P00935
l~x-:i' ,. 1/l:'w D = Dissolved Analysis -submit filtered sample SJ:-p 2 · 'tJ !/•
White copy -Headquarters Pink copy -Region Ye'l.low c?py J98Jh '\:';J. .....
1NILMINGTON REGIONAL OFFICE SEP 25 1984
DEM GRO ---UNO !'!ATER S£CTIC/I
l?ALEIGH. 11 r
• •
N, C, DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES LAB NllMBERG -{/'if()
SERIAL No.----& COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT , <-----, " -c _J
-DEM DATE REc D n~ o<-. d zr., I
REPORT TO, (circle one)' GROUNDWATER FIELD/LAB FORM REC'D BY~,/(~(j~•==.------:a--
(ARQ, WSRO, MRO, FRO, WaRO, X/7/ J t}~ ~
R01 RRO, Ahoskie FO, DATA ENTRY BY ,,./("J/C..,/ ~-/ :7 ~
OTHER,._______ DATA REPORTED CJ-?.() ;Ye
PURPOSE: (circle one) baseline, pollution monitor, other A,,~,,. t:J,..,,,._l ~," ~.1-,:/',~ / :J/i/~ I
DATE COLLECTED tS-l-J ...... ~'-1-Time / 54-~ By JPJ.$./h ~¥ ,c, I: Location or site £.o /,,-,,.,,--/-E//;",-;; /JJ .rJ,
1
.t""I 7:, 1·, ·,;. ',/~~/,,.~ i&nt
COUNTY [ o/. .. ,. J,1 ',
QUAD No.Cf' 'JC/ h
Description of sampling po;lnt. nv f-5 /c/ ,1 Tc: ,_/ ~~ Sampled interval £,v T rJd 4,,,
1 / "1'v 3;! -~ T /)
' r, f-ff--:-?")')-, I
•
Remarks J._,..,)-1..•/-:~//
r I
Field Analysis By: /l:I ~//1/?v"--• /,
r (pwriping time, air temp, etc,)
Lat ._3=-...,_'/_,_/ _,_9_,Z:~/ ___ Long,_7~$_/_/ _Z:.._Z... ___ _
•
pH~-=~
s-, I,.()
Spec. Cond., __ q~~<~ ____ Temp. __ ~/~Q~?~-----·•_0c,__ __ )dor ,1.,-,✓ •· ( Appearance C'/1"/-,t,, Taste A./a f-------
I
Lab Analysis
/Alkalinity to pH 4.5 P00410 ri "'J!/1
/Alkalinity, Hydroxide P71830 <-I mg[l
~-Silver (D) P01075 ug[l BOD P00310 mg[l
/Al-Aluminum (D) P01106 < /00 .ug/1 COD P00341 /1
/ca~bonate P00445 ,< I ms/1 -~a-Barium (D) P01005 -<=/DOOu8/1 Coliform (Fecal MF) P31616 /lOOml
/ Bit:.arbotfa'l:e P00440 ~;). mg{l Ca-Calcium (D) P00915 "'J!/1 Coliform (total MF) P31505 /lOOml
.....-PH value ('w'nen analyzed) P00400 fl, :J units /Cd-Cadmium (D~ P01025 -"A) ug/1 TOC ·roo680 mg/1
Arsenic (D) POIOOO ug[l Cr-Chromium (D) P01030 ug[l Turbidity P82079 NTU
Carbon dioxide P00405 mg{l
/ChlOTide lD) P00940 /:J ssll
Color (True) P00080 units
_.cu-Coeeer (D) P01040 ,< .:;?() ug/1 _,,.,, Ammonia (as Ni torgen) (D) P00612 ' D;J. . !!!EJ;/1
-F;-lron (D) ro'io46 IJ/00 u8/1 ..-KJeldahl (as Nitrogen)' (D) P00623 I)' ;;i. mg/1
.....-HS;-Mercurr P71900 .:-C), ~ ug/1 _,,Nitrate+ Nitrite (as Nitrogen)(D) pQQ631 I, '6 mg/1
Cyanide P00720 mg[l
,.......Dissolved solids (D) P70301 /{)() mg{l
/n1.,,oride (D) P00951 "" !!. l mg{l
/uardnef:s (as Caco3) (D) P00900 "3~ mall
Li-Lithium (D) P01130 ug[1 _..Phosphorus, total as P (D) P00666 '3'6 mg/1
_.Mg-Magnesium (D) P00925 /,'/ mg[l _,,, Dissolved Solids -cond. meter P70304 m /1
/Mn-Hangane~e (D) P01056 -c.50 ug/1 Other Analyses:
_.....Na~Sodium (D) P00929 10 mg/1
/Hardness (non-carbonate)(D) P00902 -14 mg[l
MBAS (D) P38260 mg[l
Phenol (D) P34466 ug/1
/silica (D) P00955 'l mg/1
/sulfate (D) P00946 (u mg{l
~ecific Cond, P00094// /) UMHOS/cm
Pb-Lead (D) P01049 ug/1
GW-54 Revised 1/12/82
::::_!:_;:_:_::_s,_(:_:_<n_>_:_~~-~-:~ __ :~_/)_o_o_::_;~ IDil~t!1-QJ/Y,j:------f;tt,~fl"''"'c'l'~rtJ1.~1.futmJ
D = Dissolved Analysis -submit filtered sampleSEP 27 1984 . . ~ 2i) }984
White copy -Headquarters Pink copiW.ILMfM:roNef/EG/ONAL OF~/Cf GR
. DEM OUND \'/ATER SECTIC/l
. /JALEIGH, n; c, •
COUNTY ( (""\I l If"> 1'1.tJS
QUAD NO. I ::i, 1 _-, A 1 • SERIAL NO, l "'\< \ n,;,
REPORT TO: (circle one)
ARO, WSRO, MRO, FRO, WaRO,
tWiRO~ RRO, Ahoskie FO, OTHER ~--------
•
N, C, DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES
& COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DEM
GROUNDWATER FIELD/LAB FORM
•
PURPOSE: (circle one) baseline, pollution monitor, other r l'""'i _.r'\ P, "-, ,-.., 1_ n v•.._ ~ l \ <..., A 1 t O t"')
DATE COLLECTED. --~~-~2~/~-~pc,~'-J.~-----
(_
LAB NUMBER\ -'
DATE REC'D
REC'D BY. ________ _
DATA ENTRY BY .,Ay/) CK/?lr.--
DATA REPORTED () ~o/(} -'x✓
Des er ip tion of sampling point,_,_r..cn,_,_, ,_, _,,_,_, e,•_;• _ _:._•~.,_. -"''--'''---.'-'''-'-' ,_r_,1;_• ~--"' '"'--'-' -'''--'-' __,.-_,,~_,,_-,:,:,~1,_,7~·,_, cc· ~e:"'-'-'~'-. _______ Sampled interval ---_, ~ -• -, C r ? \ ' '
Remarks,_,_1-,,_oc__,_)-='-''-''-'-'-'''-'x,___,_,-"C.."---''-~'--''-'''--''-· ~..cc._,____,_,r,_..,-,-,_,_1,_1,,,_~·?~."l:::,_"-:.,,,d.e,s_'-'f_,__ __ ,_r_:0::,_,_1C1,,,,_,.,_-"r."°_~c,'--'-C.'-'-'--','-'-'-'Q:;.,,,:,_ _______________ _
• (pumping time, air temp; etc,)
Field Analysis By :. ___________ Lat, rl A_':) n "'1 A n Long,,_-,_,..,U"'-'1,..,<c_lc.,:c,:.,_-.~. -'''-"' _,l ____ _
v -L,,, .v ,_,--" ..,D o v ,. v cl pH ,j. w Spec. Cond .. __ _,.,~">,__ _____ Temp, L-·~ c )dor._~,~v/'l_,~'-'~'-~Appearance roy-
Lab Analysis
Alkalinity to pH 4.5
Alkalinity, Hydroxide
Carbonate
Bii:arb6tra'l:e
y pH value (\men analyzed)
Arsenic (D)
Carbon dioxide
P00410
P71830
P00445
P00440
P00400
POIOOO
P00405
/{) t11g/l
,<' I t11g/l ., I nig/1
I :i mg/1
(. hunits
ug/1
mg/1
9 mg/1
Ag-Silver (D) P01075 ug/1 BOD
v Al-Aluminum (D). P01106 -,:. //)/°;,g/1 COD
Ba-Barium (D) P01005 ug/1 Coliform (Fecal MF)
Ca-Calcium (D) P00915 Coliform (total MF)
Cd-Cadmium (D) P01025 ug/1 roe
Cr-Chromium (D) P01030 ug/1 Turbidity
,/ Cu-Copper (D) P01040 Ammonia (as Nitorgen) (D)
Kj eldahl (as Nitrogen)' (D)
V Taste /1,.,. f, :I
P00310
P00341
P31616
P31505
P00680
P82079
P00612
P00623 t/ Chloride .('D)
Color (True)
P00940
P00080 units
't/ Fe-Iron (D)
Hg-Mercury
P01046
rn§Oo
C17!"> ug/1
7/'/0 ug/1
ug/1 Nitrate+ Nitrite (as Nitrogen)(D) P00631
Cyanide
n1Sso1v~d solids (D)
if Fluoride (D)
y liardne~s (as Caco3)(D)
P00720
P70301
P00951
P00900
Hardness (_non-carbonate) (D) P00902
MBAS (D) P38260
Phenol {D) P34466
mg/1
.;;? mg/1
.:: (), I mg/1
I In mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
ug/1
Li-Lithium (D) P01130
Mg-Magnesium (D) P00925
v Mn-rlanganese .(D). P01056
Na-Sodium (D) P00929
Pb-Lead (D)
V Zn-Zinc (D)'
K-Potassium (D)
P01049
P01090
P00935
ug/1
mg/1
ug/1
mg/1
ug/1
ug/1
mg/1
Phosphorus, total as P (D)
SEP 27 1984
P00666
P70304
;;,
mg/1
/1
/lOOml
/lOOml
mg/1
NTU
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
Silica (D)
\/ Sulfate (D)
Specific Cond,
P00955
P00946
P00094
mg/I
"' i::-mg/1
UMHOS/cm
D = Dissolved Analysis -submit filtered sample
WILM/NG ION REGIONAL
DEM OFFICE~ffW'(JffJ
Yellow copy -Lab S£f> 2S 1984 White copy -Headquarters
GW-54 Revised 1/12/82
Pink copy -Region
GROUND l'/ATER SECTIC/1
f1ALEIGH, 11. c,
-..
COUNTY I'" I . "· "'" ,,
QUAD NO. r' C ?, (j-t:.
REPORT TO: (circle one)
..,SERIAL NO.
ARO, WSRO, MRO, FRO, WaRO,
1WiRO; RRO, Ahoskie FO, . OTHER -~-------
N, C, DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES
& COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DEM ,
GROUNDWATER FIELD/LAB FORM •.
I 7-'
•
PURPOSE: (circle one) baseline, pollution monitor, other /"n,•,:.,/c:;.1n-f /_/lJM'?~f-tj-"7f/bt..
DATE COLLECTED ~--</--l': 3 Time / L/ 30 By /h. $,,p'J d,..:,;,L, · Location or site £/ rnn £ o' ;,; / / -l<'-f?.. /3 o)( /1 b,,-/ t' OJ Z 89· 3 (,
Description of sampling point F1~/d -Hn.-tfv<;r'< -+n. . .,,; .,,,•f :.v~/f ,A,,,,..,,,.,../ Sampled inte_rval TD _7;:,_,-,,
L.b,,¢-nqfy:;,✓f>-,-,,-,~r.-tfr.,r-r."'s 1,.,,-, ·c' ,J .L ,,·• , I ~~-!,~.'.,,~-, ~ / , II, / Remarks•------------------------,:c-::~·.>Oc,u"7/,:.,,,__J1,;,.-"P'-'-r_,:_,-<,c1?ee..,rc'~"-• -''"'~-'-"'-<r-'/:_.r,;:...r"-'r;:.,~:,:,,l~"-<'-'"'--'c'--'~"'-'-"'~::,.;..!"'-w=...,1rc.c,._.:""-·"~"'.";N"_,,"-"-'"=--"-"-·-'rc.. t~tr JI" I 1 ,...,,,,,,,
• Field Analysis By,' fl1 , s ,/)? ..-,.V4 I.
(pumping time, air te~~• -etC,)
~,,3q;qJ2 ~-~~·•a~~-~~g~/_2~--y~·-o~--
Lab Analysis
VA1kalinity to pH 4.5 P00410 1/,1/,() mgfl ~-Silver (D)
VAlkalini ty, .Hydrox:i,de P71830 ... , mg/1 _..Al-Aluminum (D)
..,..c8rbonate P00445 </ mg/1 Ba Barium (D)
,:.,8icarb6rta"te P00440 ,5;!:/:_n mg/ 1 (.,Ca-Calcium (D)
L.pwV:itlue· ~tten analyzed) P00400 'f ~units Cd-Cadmium (D)
Ai;senic (D) POlOOO ug/1 Cr-Chromium (_D)
Carbon dioXide P00405 mgll v'cu COEEer (D)
t-,Ch'loTide·· tn) P00940 5.£:l)mg/1 Vr"e-Iron (D)
CoiOr (Tr6ei). P00080 units H~-Mercurr
Cyanide P00720 mg/1 ~Li-Lithium (D) • L--Dissolved solids (D) ?70301 ;,,:fry) mgll
vF1tforide (D) P00951 a,B mg/1
VM&-Magnesium (D)
~-ijan~anese (D)
vtfs.-rdrii!ss (as CaC03) (D) P00900 l:, I mg[! "°Na~Sodium (D)
Vifardness (non-carbonate)(D) P00902 ..:./ mg/1 Pb-Lead (D)
MBAS (D) P38260 mg/1 &,,,Zn-Zinc (D)
VPhenol (D) P34466 < 6 ug/1 VK-Potassium (D)
(✓silica (D) P00955 h mg/1
V°sulfate (D) ?00946 ,:;/ ,/.. mg/1
P01075 ug/1
P01106 ., I/JD .ug/1
P01005 ug/L
P00915 II !"Jl/1
P01025 ug/1
P01030 ug/1
P01040 ...:.,3_ 0 ug/1
P01046 ..c;oo ug/1
rii9oo ug/1
P01130 ~~i) ug/1
ro092s A'.e, mg/1
P01056 .,(_ 15"/) ug/1
P00929 f/U-Q. mg/1
P01049 <Jo,1 ug/1
P01090 ·</Jn ug/1
P00935 2./p. mg/1
I
Appearance T,.,,,,, L.. d
Crny
BOD
COD
Coliform (Fecal MF)
Coliform (total MF)
TOC
Turbidity
vAmmonia (as Nitorgen) (D)
vKj eldahl (as Nitrogen)' (D)
Taste "> /1,:--J~~,y _
/3;,-llt/;,,_1 $ J,
P00310 mgfl
Pn0341 /1
P31616 /lOOml
:..:P31505 /lOOml
-poo6ao mg/1
P82079 NTU
P00612 '1,/. ~/1
P00623 a. ::z. mg/1
loo'Nitrate + Nitrite (as Nitrogen)(D) P00631 .3LJ. mg/1
;..,Phosphorus, total as P (D) P00666 , p ;i.., mg/1
t,_DiSsolved Solids -cond. meter P70304 mg/1
Other Analyses:
•
l,lspecific Cond, P00094 :J ~DUMHOS I cm
_____ :...C::':::=::::':'===:::;;:============='------o-=-nissolved-Analysis-~-submit-filtered-sample
White copy -Headquarters Pink copy -Region Yellow copy -Lab
GW-54 Revised 1/12/82 \
JUN !J 1S83
WILMINGTON REGIONI\L OFFICE
DEM
Oroundwatir Section
CENTRAL LABORATORY REPORT
Cou,ltY C..OL 1 ,r. n LJJ5
Grid Location C...C.-34 h I
lier ial. Numb ■ r f) C) ')
Date CoU ected lo --Z. 9 -, 9 Tima'---'\_4,._--'-1 .,_5 _____ By :-'-1::i_='--'c_=-=\f-;__s.,-'"''-'-➔_,,...,v:,.z'-"fi,._-c __ Q._~_ ---,-'----
1 Location or s1 te V-Eb h: ET'l4 · .r1,._,, c.o.-n.-S . I ...
Des c r 1 pt ion of Samp Ung Point._--!:H:!:O=S::..E!==~_,_1;,;i._l,_13'""-ll3.>---'----'--'--'-.;.:._ ______ ,.....;_ ___ _
Remarksl \l>U?~P I \Ac~· ·.,-, -'1'P'• IQ /"\ ,,..,. ( rrE'S
j (Pumping Time, Air Temperature, etc,)
FIELD A.'IAL YSIS
I pl! ___ _,,(a,.._..._(.-lp..,_,,Hci'--,' P="'-,._P"-'-1"'-"· '=::i...=-)'-'--. ______ Odor. __ ~5=F:;_Pe<._.!T_.Jlc_sC----'A:i..r'.)c..>.-1.D.L·-,/J--'o...,_,fjl.-a,._-.....i:;Hic?c,_>-=-·'-----
1 -t
Spec, Cond ·---~-•~·::_'·_· ---'-' .;_• _ _._,.._. _ __;Appearance, __ ...:'--=:'-=-E:"'--'d>=\0.,,_ ______ -'------
Temp ._'-I ..:;'2:.4:c . .__ ___ 0c · Tas te;___.JN=C\~lf'l_-_ _.J,,_.J-,..,.=·~s"-."1'-'-G"$"-'Q,"'· "'------------
1 PLEASE ~EST FOR CONSTITUENTS OR PROPERTIES AS ,INDICATED. JIBPORT ANALYSIS TO: C!UEF'
GROUNDWATER SECTION RALEIGH N.C.
I _ Alkalinity (As CaC03)
[2l to pH 8.3 ......... _. __ -<----'-/ __ ...,mg/1
[SJ to pH 4,5...... ... mg/1
CT] A.l!uminum............. ,2 () {) ug/1
D AJseoic.............. ug/1
[:Q B{carbooate •• ,....... If mg/ 1
D B6D, 5-Day........... !D&/1
! ;< i cJrbonate............ "/ Jll3/l
D cJrbon Dio~ide....... ,:z ;z, mg/1
[3] cJ1oride............. 9 mg/1
D C1liforJD (Total MF).. /l0Oml
□-Copper ........ ; •• ,... ug/l
CJ cJanide.............. !D&/1
I LJ Dissolved Solids..... 7.,/, mg/ l I CJ Fluoride............. < mg/l
! X 111lrdness es Ceco3,... .-2 O !l'-3/ 1 I l!ardness, o D I Non Carbonate •• , •. __ __..,:l;__ __ ;--'mg/1
LJ Iron................. /l,o() ug/1
I D Lead .•. , , •••• , . • . • • • • ug/ l I CJ Lithium ........... ,,. < :.[{1 ug/1
r7MI ' ,,~o 11 L::..:..J anga:iese ..••••.• ,... ug
I D Mercury.............. ug/ l
I
I . FOR INTERJ.AB USE
Sample~ In 1/~/71 I -. Log ent. -~, ··· ·
D~ta elt. -;:;-., __
I
ck. ---
ck,
Nitrogen .
. Kj eldahl. , .. ,. , . , • • <, /
Nitrate & Nitrite. <, 0£,
pl! v~i.~~0 (Wb-:io analyzed "'~~
mg/1
t:lg/1
>·V-•/ '-
u11,/l fhenol .. ,,, .•••.•.... ______ ...:
Phosphorus, Total. .. , ,. __ < ... ,_..o'-'-<'"-r_, ___
Potaasium •••.••••••••. _ __.o~ __ ~,f~.--
mg/1
1118/l
Specific Conductance
(JDicromhos at 25°c) .. _-'(....;Oe:.,::;c? __
Silica •.••.. ~···•••••--~ff._.,~;/------' mg/l
Sodium •••••••••••..••. __ _.....c......_.....;
Sulfate ...••••••••••• __ ~t_9,...__...;
mg/1
mg/1
ug/1
mg/1
Zinc,,.~······•~·····------'
Calciuµi ..• , •• ,,, .. ,.. · f, ;;L,
Magnesium .....••.•. ,. /~,;J.. mg/I
Remarks:
P-A 'Yl DOc' -, u,21 F L-.L-
Date Reported 1;-17-?f
GJ ~ D
@
[2J
8J
0 ~
0
□ CJ
0
\;,-.·:
<..C..-'3l . C • Groundwater Section (
c:,;TR..U. L"i.BO?j,TORY REPO. · ..
County LOlC.'1'.,,f/5(/2 .
c-C[D ~
L[l.boratorv Nuober
Collected By:
D Alk.alnity (As CaCO )
I 3 to pH 8.3 ••••••••• _______ mg/l
to pH 4.5. ••• ••••• D'l,/1
D Al•,-:i'lnum_ •••••••••• ~ ,._· ______ 1,1g/i .
I • I jArsenic: •••••••••••••• _· _______ µg/1
I
.._ _ __,jBic:arbonate •••••••••• ___ ~----'mg/1
I I ,, .
'-----' EOD, 5-Day .....• ~ .· .. •-·--------'mg/1
j ra· r"oonal •e· · . · · mg/1
L_ _ __Jj V • l. •• • • •• a • a •• e --'-'-------' I I I . . d. / , I Ca.rho! Dioxi .e ••• '. ••• ________ mg 1
: · _[IJ ___ c:,..1orlde .•••••••• '.. '.. ~g/1 ·•
L____J Colifl,;, (Total ill').: /lOOml
C=:J Copp~r
1
.... ; ....... ; .~· .·_ ·-----~...r•g/1
j J Cyanide .••••••.•••. · •• _______ mg/1
j J Dissolled Solids •• ; •• ________ ._mg/1
I __ J_I Fluori~I e. '. '. •••• '. ••• ; ·-. _·_;:o:;._· '_c_l _ ____cmg/1
, i · · l "'~rdn~f s a~ CaC03 •• ~,: ______ --'mg/1
~ F.ardness,
r:on Ci~rbonate ••..• _______ ms/1
C
Phenol.................. µg/1 C ------
-<o. oS' mg/1 l Y
· Potassium: •.•.••••.••• ·. ;._· ______ iig/1 ·. L
C
Silica .••••••••.•••• ,.: •• _____ ___,mg/1 L
pR Value(When analyzed.~-· ------
Phos~honis, Total.. .•..••.
Specific Conductance .
·(mic:romhos at 25°C) ••••• _____ _
Sodiu:n •................... _____ _, µg/1. .· ~
mg/1· ' '---
iig/1 I ~· . -£1nc, ................................ _____ _
Remarks:
Pl,c/J-5c-/2-Ul'I tL:11/ lk~o.,
' I I I-o~ . . · »g/1 ~--~--' ~ ~-................................ _______ _
; '.:I=='.· I Lezc •.••••••••••••••• ______ µg/1
i. =l =· ===:::'.l T.ithi~.............. g/1
/ l:ranganJse;........... g/1 ,e7· I . j :-ferc:ur~. • • • . . • • • • • • • • µg/1
Field Analyses
-·•v,1. : -, ......
· T ernp •.................... ·
pH.~-........... • ...... • .• -.-------
Other .............. : ......... . -------
Log e:ic.. /_),,-:-._.--I ck. P/.,'-'/
J;:!..~2. ent. ~r.1/ ck. .. Date Re? orted JUN 1 81975
CE:T;:t,\L U,EORATORY RE?ORT
L2.boratory Nue1ber ---"'==,.__......:;===-----•_'\
I ·~ · r, v· .( Gro~ndwater Se~tion (
ca:TRAL L.\BOK.\TORY REPOR •.
County L/Jl(///1:JUZ>
c-c-7 I ,•,:-
.0
. I
Laboratory !iu~b2:r
Collected By:
I
D _;1;.:a lini ty (As CaCO )
to pH 8.3 .•••••• ~•--------=
to pH 4.5 ..••.•.•• ____ -'-__ -
mg/1
rng/1
C=:J ~l..:cinu.!!!. .•.•.••.••.•
I ! ;..=se,Jc ••••• -••••••••• ----,--___J
j I Bicarb[onate ••••• ~· ••• •--------'
r I I . . ,;
.. · µg/1
µg/1
mg/1
mg/1
C
Phenol •••••••••••••••.•• _· _ _;__ ___ _jµg/1. C
P h <c .o-S I I . , · hosp orus, Total ••••••• ,.. _____ _;ng l. \I
·Potassium .•••• : ••••••• ;._·___; ____ _,µg/1 L
pH Value(When analyzed.; · · ------
;::! :::::::'.:OD: 5
1
-Day •••••••••••
'-----·~l~ar~orate •••..••••• ~.--------' mg/1 · ·specific Conductance C ' ! I Carboni ~ioxide •.•••• ·-------= c• IG1lorike •.••••••••••• _· ______ _,
I · i ColifoL (Total m') •• c=J Copper\ •••••• ; ••••••• ______ _,
IC "di . · . • '------' yani e .••••••••••••. _ ___; ____ __;;
~-~j DissolJed Solids •••• •---~-----' ✓ I I .
1.:-1., "d · . '----'--~ ... ~.._or1 e.. ••••.•••••••• _ _....::c:c_.:_'-------'
~. I '-----'I E.ardness as CaC03 •• ;. ______ __;
C:=J Rardnels, :
Non Carbonate .•..• ______ _
mg/1
mg/1
/lOOml
g/1
mg/1
mg/1
6,/ mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
~--' Iron. ................. _______ , µg/1
µg/1
•g/1
·µg/1
µg/1
USE
-og 2::'.!.t • __ ._,,_:_.,.~I _ ck~ ~-i
(micromhos at 25°C) ••••• _· _____ _
Sili_ca •••••••••••••••••• _____ __;;ng/1 j
Sodium •••••••••••••••••• _____ __,µg/1 L
Sulfate ••••••••••••••••• -------=c:.g/i L
-
_-____ µ,g/.L· r-t...inc •••••••••••••••••• ·• • ..... I
.· Re.l!arks:
PL-E/-J-S;:;-· /2-v1:1 -ri:1✓
J:, . ·"' .,,,., 1.1 9
·-.,u
Field Analyses
.pH.~· .•••.•...••.. ~ •••
ilr<o I' L,,,...., • J
I I
Other ••••••• ;: ••••••• -.--------------
j)(=p,,;-f --~ :3 ,S, I
:JUN 18 1975 __..., I : ,;P(,,-,;.-,.,,! ck., Date Rqorted
Groundwater Section ,
CE?,'i:R.-\L LABORATO~Y REPO. c.c.. --::,
Collected By:
I ,-----,Alkalinity (As CaCO)
'---~' to pH 8.3, ...... ~.-----~mg/l
to pH 4. 5......... rag/1
CJ Aluminum. ............. ___ --,-___ _,µg /1 -I --I I Arsenic............... µg/1
I I BicarJonate.,.,,, •• ,. : -mg/1
I ·rj ! BOD, 5-Day ••••••• ;;.. mg/1 ~ 1----
~-~lcarbonate............ mg/1
I I Carboj Dioxide, • • . • • • mg/1 ~ Chlori~e .•••• ,., ••. u-_-------mg/1
I I ColifoL (Total MF).. -/lOOml
I I Copper!. ..... ,. ...... :-::::::::::::~g/1 ~-----1----
1 /Cyanide .•• ,, ••.•• , ••• -_-_______ mg/1
I I Dissolled Solids ••••• -mg/1 ·-~ I -l ✓ IF1u~ride ............. -<o,I mg/1
· I I" d I --· r ro ---' mg/1 • ~ ~:ar _ ne[s es u'1u 3 •••• ______ _
L__J .~ar':ness, .
Non Carbonate,.... mi/1
, C==:J Iron. ......•••• ; . • • • • µg/1
~-~' Lead .. .l.... ... .. .. .. µg/1
I lr,ithiuai[ ............ •-----~"g/1
L.=1:Ls.ng~:1ebe............ g/1
l -, :-rerc:ur) ............ _______ _,..µg/1
I
FQ;{ INT2LAB USE
3:3..:.J?l-:!3 In /).-~<
r..cg 2nt ·-----'-
11-rY.-r..,_,
Nitrogen j -
· Kj eldahl. . • . . . . . . • . • . , · Li). J
Nitrate & Nitrite. •• .J-r-L.-:-o~, O_j __ _
;~, G
mg/:/ ,; -I mg/~
pR Value(When analyzed.; ------
Phenol. .•...• · .....•.•.•. µg/1 -----~
Phosphorus, Total: ••••• ~;-Lo,0::t mg/1
. Po~assium .•. ·: .. ~-• .• _-.. ~:~------µg/1
Specific Conductance
(microi:!hos at 25°C) ••.•• -,------
mg/1 Silica ........ · ........... -------'
.,N /'1 '"'0' ...
rag/1
µg/1 Zinc.·.· .•...• ·.~ .....•.•.• _-______ ,
-Re.marks:
C
C
LY
C
C
C
r L-
C
r-
/?t_,r31J-5;;;, /2Uf'I ft;,/ h<:O.
Field Analyses f(1 i::\r/ ·,,_
Temp ••.••..••. ~ ...••. : ______ _
pH .• ·• • ••. • • • • • • • • • • • • . -------Other ........... ~ ........ · -------
f)r:p:r;+ -:::~ :3 5-/
ck.
ck, -· _ D-,.f:_e Reported
IJUl·I 18 1975