NCD003446721_19970630_Celeanse Corporation - Shelby Fiber_FRBCERCLA SPD_Annual Site Summary Status Report June 1996 - June 1997-OCR

I·
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Macon/Dock:ery Site
Richmond County, North Carolina
June 30, 1997
Ms. Giezelle Bennett
Remedial Project Manager
US EPA, Region IV
345 Courtland Street
Atlanta, Georgia 30365
Reply to: Technical Committee
c/o David L. Jones
Ingersoll-Rand Company
114 Spencer Road
Cassopolis, Michigan
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Re: · Macon/Dockery Site -Cordova, Richmond County, North Carolina
Annual Summary Status Report; June 1, 1996 to June 1, 1997
Dear Ms. Bennett:
On behalf of the Macon/Dockery Site Group (MDSG), the Annual Summary Status
Report for the period of June 1, 1996 to June 1, 1997 is herewith submitted in
accordance with SECTION XV -PROGRESS REPORTS of the Unilateral
Administrative Order (effective date -June 30, 1992) for the Macon/Dockery Site.
Please find one (1) original copy of the report enclosed with this letter.
Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me.
]("' . SC~ Pnri·
David L. Jones
Project Coordinator
cc: Macon/Dockery Site Group Members
Paul Furtick, RMT, Inc.
David Lown, NC Superfund Section
L
i
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
]
]
MACON/DOCKERY SITE
CORDOVA, RICHMOND COUNTY
NORTH CAROLINA
ANNUAL SUMMARY STATUS REPORT
June 1, 1996 TO JUNE 1, 1997
Prepared for:
The Macon/Dockery Site Group
June 30, 1997
Prepared By:
Applied Earth Sciences, Inc.
751 Arbor Street
Concord, North Carolina 28025
Steven E. lrminger, P.E. o. 21005
Senior Engineer I
C(Jort/?
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page No.
1.0 lntroduction ..................................................................................................... 1
2.0 System Performance Review .......................................................................... 1
2.1 Flow Rates and Totals .......................................................................... 2
2.2 Percent Operational. ............................................................................. 2
2.3 Problems Encountered and Corrective Actions .................................... 3
2.3.1 Electrical Problems .................................................................... 3
2.3.2 Weather Related Problems ....................................................... .4
2.3.3 Individual Sites .......................................................................... -4
3.0 System Effectiveness ...................................................................................... 8
4.0 1997/1998 Schedule ....................................................................................... 9
Table 1
Table 2
Table 3
Table 4
Table 5
Table 6
Table 7
Table 8
LIST OF TABLES
Summary of Groundwater Flow Totals
Summary of Operational Percentages
Summary of Influent and Effluent Analytical Results
Groundwater Level Data
Groundwater Quality Summary
Summary of Air Sample Analyses
Summary of voe Removal Estimates
1997/1998 Schedule
LIST OF APPENDICES
Appendix A Regulatory Correspondence
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
MACON/DOCKERY SITE
CORDOVA RICHMOND COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
ANNUAL STATUS REPORT
June 1, 1996 TO JUNE 1, 1997
1.0 Introduction
The following document is the 1996/1997 annual status report for the Macon/Dockery
Superfund project in Cordova, Richmond County, North Carolina. This report satisfies
the reporting requirements for an annual summary status report set forth in the
Unilateral Administrative Order For Remedial Design and Remedial Action, Section XV
Part D, dated June 18, 1992. For site history and background information the reader is
referred to the Remedial Investigation/ Feasibility Study (RI/FS) completed in 1991.
2.0 System Performance Review
The remedial systems started operation during the week of February 12, 1996. The
following sections summarize performance data for the remedial systems, and
problems encountered during the reporting period (June 1, 1996 to June 1, 1997).
Page No. 1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Many of the problems were associated with warrantied equipment and system
debugging as the site experienced its first year of operation.
2.1 Flow Rates and Totals
System flow total data are recorded on a weekly basis from the remedial systems.
Monthly totals for the systems are summarized in the monthly status reports. A
summary of the flow rates and totals for each groundwater system are included in Table
1. Since start-up in February 1996, the system flow totals are as follows:
♦
♦
♦
♦
Upper Dockery
Lower Dockery
Macon Source Area
Upper & Lower Macon
2.2 Percent Operational
24,824,580 gallons
22,258,546 gallons
25,581,715 gallons
64,245,893 gallons
System downtime is recorded on a daily basis and summarized on the monthly
progress reports. A summary of the percent operational time is contained in Table 2.
The following are the average percent operational data for the reporting period of June
1, 1996 to June 1, 1997:
♦ Upper Dockery 88 percent
Page No. 2
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
♦ Lower Dockery 76 percent
♦ Macon Source Area 92 percent
♦ Upper Macon 82 percent
♦ Lower Macon 78 percent
♦ Soil Vapor Extraction System 82 percent
2.3 Problems Encountered and Corrective Actions
Several site-wide problems occurred during the reporting period that negatively affected
operational percentages for all of the remedial systems at the Macon/Dockery site. The
following sections describe those widespread problems followed by a description of
problems at individual sites.
2.3.1 Electrical Problems
During the spring and summer months of 1996, there were numerous power outages at
the project site due to non-project related power line work conducted offsite by the local
power company, Pee Dee Electric Company. On several occasions the power outages
required site visits after power was restored for manual restarting of the systems. After
August, 1996, the power line repair work conducted by Pee Dee Electric Company was
completed and the system disruptions due to this cause ceased to occur.
Page No. 3
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
2.3.2 Weather Related Problems
In June 1996, all systems were down for four (4) days due to power disruption from a
storm. In August 1996, hurricane Fran passed through the area disrupting power to the
remedial systems for a period of up to three (3) weeks. In several locations, power was
interrupted due to tree branches falling on power lines onsite.
2.3.3 Individual Sites
The following sections briefly summarize problems and their corrective actions at the
individual Macon/Dockery remedial systems.
Upper Dockery
In June 1996, the Upper Dockery infiltration galleries were observed to be at
capacity when all of the groundwater extraction wells were in operation. During periods
when the infiltration galleries appeared to be at capacity; as many as two (2)
groundwater extraction wells were removed from service in an attempt to reduce the
flow entering the infiltration galleries. In July, 1996, the Upper Dockery infiltration
galleries were treated with chlorine. Since treatment, the infiltration galleries have been
performing within their design specifications.
Page No. 4
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Lower Dockery
Liquid level probes in the equalization tank failed repeatedly in June 1996 through
October 1996. In October 1996, the manufacturer replaced the defective probes.
Macon Source Area
The Macon Source Area remediation system has been performing without significant
problems since system start-up.
Upper Macon
Liquid level probes in the equalization tank failed repeatedly in June 1996 through
October 1996. In October 1996, the manufacturer replaced the defective probes.
On several occasions during the reporting period, the equalization tank has been
drained due to a suspected siphon effect. Vacuum breaks were added to the return
line in July 1996 to prevent siphoning effects.
In March 1997, the infiltration galleries that serve the combined flow from the Upper and
Lower Macon remediation systems were observed to be full. Two (2) Upper Macon
groundwater extraction wells were turned off for approximately three (3) weeks to
reduce the total flow to the infiltration galleries. After the three (3) week period, the two
Page No. 5
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
(2) wells were returned to service and the infiltration galleries have been observed to be
operating within normal operating water levels. The infiltration gallery problem is
suspected to have been a seasonal problem.
Manganese treatment was added to the combined effluent of the Upper and Lower
Macon remediation systems in February 1997.
Lower Macon
Liquid level probes in the equalization tank failed repeatedly in June 1996 through
October 1996. In October 1996, the manufacturer replaced the defective probes.
On several occasions during the reporting period, the equalization tank has been
drained due to a suspected siphon effect. Vacuum breaks were added to the return
line in July 1996 to prevent siphoning effects.
Manganese treatment was added to the combined effluent of the Upper and Lower
Macon remediation systems in February 1997.
Soil Vapor Extraction System
Neighbors of the site complained about noise from the SVE blower in February, 1996.
As a result, the SVE blower was placed on a timer June 18, 1996, such that it operates
Page No. 6
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
from 8:00 AM to 8:00 PM.
The SVE blower motor was replaced in September 1996 due to water damage. In
April 1997 the SVE blower motor was replaced with a motor designed for outdoor
exposed conditions.
Since start-up the SVE moisture separator tank frequently filled and shut down the SVE
system. In November 1996, the SVE moisture separator tank was automated to drain
once it had achieved a full status.
2.4 Effluent Concentrations
A measure of the system performance can be made based on the systems ability to
achieve remedial performance standards. _A summary of the effluent water analytical
results is included in Table 3. During the reporting period the effluent sample analytical
results have been below the performance standard concentrations.
Based on the concentrations reported for the effluent water and air samples, the
remediation systems are operating as originally designed.
Page No. 7
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
3.0 System Effectiveness
System effectiveness at reducing contaminant concentrations at the site is indicated by
periodic groundwater elevation measurements and groundwater and air samples.
Groundwater elevation measurements and groundwater samples were collected from
the monitor wells on a quarterly basis during the period June 1, 1996, to June 1, 1997.
Air samples were collected from the groundwater system effluents and the SVE system
effluent and observation wells on a quarterly basis. The sampling frequency and
analytical parameters were conducted as stipulated in the Performance Standards
Verification Plan. On July 27, 1996, the EPA approved a reduction in the sampling
parameters and sampling frequency, based on analytical data trends observed for the
site by that date. A copy of the MDSG proposed sampling reduction and the EPA
response letter is contained in Appendix A.
A summary of the groundwater level measurements and calculated groundwater
elevations is contained in Table 4. Based on measurements conducted in monitor wells
(MW-11 and MW-21) located outside of the drawdown effect created by the
groundwater extraction wells; the background seasonal groundwater elevation appears
to have varied by approximately 7 to 9 feet during the reporting period.
A summary of the analytical results reported for the water samples collected from the
monitor wells is contained in Table 5. Air analytical results from the SVE system are
Page No. 8
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
summarized in Table 6. Air sample results from the remediation system offgas sample
ports and from the property line sample are also summarized in Table 6.
Mass removal estimates are calculated for each of the remedial systems on a monthly
basis. The estimates are based on monthly flow volume and influent concentration
data. A summary of the mass removal estimates for the remedial systems is included
in Table 7.
Based on the mass removal estimates, the remediation systems at the Macon/Dockery
site are effectively remediating the subsurface target parameters.
4.0 1997/1998 Schedule
The following details the proposed 1997 /1998 schedule for the Macon/Dockery site
tasks:
♦ The 1997/1998 sample schedule is shown on Table 8;
♦ the approved operation and maintenance (O&M) program will continue;
♦ progress status reporting will continue to be submitted to the EPA on a monthly
basis; and,
Page No. 9
'
'
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
:1
I
I
I
I
I
♦ the next annual summary status report will summarize the period June 1, 1997 to
June 1, 1998.
Page No. 10
- -- - - -
Upper Dockery
Monthly Average
Date Monthly Flow Total Flow Flow Rate
(gallons} (gallons) (gallons per minute)
Jun-96 97,350 850,482 2.3
Jul-96 163,426 1,013,908 3.8
Aug-96 218,330 1,232,238 5 1
Sep-96 149,420 1,381,658 3.5
Oct-96 140,191 1,521,849 3.2
Nov-96 438,013 1,959,862 10.1
Dec-96 161,903 2,121,765 3.7
Jan-97 294,071 2,415,836 6.8
Feb-97 267,596 2,683,432 6.2
Mar-97 250.068 2,933,500 5.8
Apr-97 276,556 3,210,056 6.4
May-97 289,938 3,499,994 6.7
Period Trals: 24,824,580
- - - - -- -
TABLE 1
SUMMARY OF GROUNDWATER FLOW TOTALS
JUNE 1, 1996 TO JUNE 1, 1997
MACON/DOCKERY SITE
RICHMOND COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
-
Lower Dockery Macon Source Area
Monthly Average Monthly Average
Monthly Flow Total Flow Flow Rate Monthly Flow Total Flow Flow Rate
(gallons) (gallons) (gallons per minute) (gallons) (gallons) (gallons per minute)
8,619 773,872 0.2 114,048 1,162,623 2.6
151,827 925,699 3.5 202,477 1,365,100 4.7
126,232 1,051,931 2.9 207,503 1,572,603 4.8
63,833 1,115,764 1.5 209,649 1,782,252 4.9
460,379 1,576,143 10.7 101,512 1,883,764 2.3
183,210 1,759,353 4.2 116,354 2,000.118 2.7
137,594 1,896,947 3.2 137,045 2,137,163 3.2
286,202 2,183,149 6.6 146,036 2,283,199 3.4
90,912 2,274,061 2.1 215,730 2,498,929 5.0
277,823 2,551,884 6.4 223,222 2,722,151 5.2
180,560 2,732,444 4.2 253,167 2,975,318 5.9
684,855 3,417,299 15.9 223,177 3,198,495 5.2
22,258,546 25,581,715
- -- - -
Upper/Lower Macon
Monthly Average
Monthly Flow Total Flow Flow Rate
(gallons) (gallons) (gallons per minute)
48,305 1,615,569 1.1
759,920 2,375,489 17.6
638,400 3,013,889 14.8
302,505 3,316,394 7.0
640,760 3,957,154 14.8
871,155 4,828,309 20.2
725,549 5,553,858 16.8
596,131 6,149,989 13.8
795,239 6,945,228 18.4
939,710 7,884,938 21.8
918,080 8,803,018 21.3
999,040 9,802,058 23.1
64,245,893
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Month
Jun-96
Jul-96
Aug-96
Sep-96
Oct-96
Nov-96
Dec-96
Jan-97
Feb-97
Mar-97
Apr-97
May-97
Upper Dockery
(% Operational)
33
100
97
77
77
100
75
100
100
100
100
100
I Average 88
Notes: NR = Not Recorded
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
TABLE 2
SUMMARY OF OPERATIONAL PERCENTAGES
MACON/DOCKERY SITE
RICHMOND COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
Macon Source
Lower Dockery Area Upper Macon
(% Operational) (% Operational) (% Operational)
5 33 20
65 100 100
100 100 100
77 77 40
90 97 42
93 100 100
75 100 100
100 100 77
53 100 100
58 100 100
100 100 100
100 100 100
76 92 82
Soil-Vapor
Lower Macon Extraction Unit
(% Operational) (% Operational)
20 100
90 100
55 91
13 40
100 90
100 93
100 100
77 94
100 100
100 100
100 27
81 52
78 82
-- - -- - --- --- - --- ---
UD Influent 2/13/96 4.8 150E
2/13/96 7.7 130 33
2/14/96 4.3 89E 1.2 55 4.5
2/14/96 6.5 100 " 5.3
2/14/96 4.4 120E 1.4 1.3 50 7.9
2/!4/96 110 " 7.8
2/15/96 4.5 !JOE 1.2 1.4 54 8.3
2/15/96 5.5 140 56 8.6 2.8
2/\6/96 7.5 160 64 !O
2/17/96 5.7 \SOE 1.7 2.1 62 9.4
2/17/96 5.5 120 42 6.4
2/22/96 5.4 !SOE 1.4 52 5.7
2/22/96 4.9 96 " 5.5
2/28/96 6.4 200E 1.9 19 5.3
2/28/96 6.8 240 50
3/8/96 5.2 J30•FJ5 1.7 55 3.8 4/3/96 3.6 l60E l.l 1.6 38 5.6
4/3/96 3 92 25 3.9
513/96 4 130 38 4.8
615196 110 5.2 2.8
7/1/96 77 25 3.6 8/J/96 6.1 210 52 5.7
11/7/96 240 54
I 1/7/96
2/5/97 !00 31
5/1,1/97 56 16 3.5
UD Effluent 2/13/96
2/14/96
2/14/96
2/15/96
2/16/96
2/17/96
2/22/96
2/28/96
3/8/96
413196
5/3/96
6/S/96 3.9
7/1/96
8/1/96
9/4/96
10/1/96
lln/96
12/5/96 1.5
116191
215197
3/12/97
4/8/97
5/14/97
Remediation Perfonnance Standard 3500 7 70 200 2.8 1000
Nole: A blanl means bdow detection limit
Nole: • Acclonc confirmed by Method 8260
-- -- - - - - ---- --- ----
VD Influent 2/)3/96 3.1
2/13/96
2/14196 12 53 14 52 ----2/!4/96
2/14/96 II 54 14 ----------2/ 14/96
2/15/96 19 81 53
2/15/96
2/16/96 II 57 II
2/17/96 55 12
2/17/')6
2122/96 13 13 ------2/22/96
2/28/96 II 7.7
2/28/96
3/8196 ----------4/3/96 II 52 -------4/3/96 -------5/3/96 16 58
6/5/96
7/J/96 ----------&/1/96 II 5.5 10
11/7/96 2100 19 61 9.5
11/7/96 150°
2/5/97 12 51
5/14/97 58 5.3
UD Efiluent 2/!J/96 70•FJ2 16 71 40 22 14
2/14/96 35°F33 15 53 14 II
2/1'1/96 II 56 12
2/15/96 12 53 14
2/16/96 53 II
2/17/96 II " 12
2/22/96 8.3
2/28196 13 9.6 10
3/8/96 25 6.9
.j/)/96 28 II 50
5/3/96 52
6/5/96
7/1/96
8/1/96 20 14 51 7 8
9/4/96 55
10/1/96 5.9
11/7/96 15 59
12/5/96 12 54 5.1
J/6/97 13 54
215/97 15 61 5.9
3/12197 69
4/8/97 63
S/14191 60 7.2
Remediation Performance Standard 400 3500 50 1000 50 5000 15
Note: A bbnl mean• bclo,, deleetion limit
Nnte: ' Aceione confirmed by Method 1260
--- - - -- -- --- - -- - - - -
a e Cis/trans-1,2-Dichloroethene Methylene chloride I, I, I-Trichloroethane
Location {ug/L) {ug/L) {ug/L)
LD In!luent 2/13/96 I. I 80 33 40
2/14/96 1.3 I !OE 43 37
2/14/96 80 13 15
2/14/96 1.6 94E 39 1.8 1.7 39
2/14/96 6,1 16 2.2 2.5 18
2/ 15/96 1.2 82 32 1.7 29
2/16/96 3.3 95 35 2.6 31
2/22/96 2.5 5.8 100 54
2/28/96 1.2 93E 33 30
2/28/96 92 35 30
3/8/96 2 110 47 34
4/3/96 79 36 28
5/3/96 71 30 1.7 40
6/5/96 67 32 I.I 2 42
8/1/96 83 27 54
11/7/96 69 28 38
3/12/97 66 21 23
5/14/97 62 25 23
LD Effluent 2/13/96
2/14/96
2/14/96
2/15/96
2/16/96
2/22/96
2/28/96
3/8/96
4/3/96
513/96
8/1/96
10/1/96
11/7/96
12/5/96
1/6/97
3/12/97
4/8/97
5/14/97
Remediation Performance Standard 3500 7 70 5 200
Note: A blank means below detection limi1
--- - - - - ---- --- --- - -
Cadmium Suspended Solids
location (ug/L) (ug/L) (ug/L) (ug/L) (ug/L) (mg/L)
LO lnHucnt 2113/96 6.4 17 260 270
2/14/96 8.6 8.3 250 120
2/ 14/96
2/14/96 9 8.3 240 110
2114/96 6.6 6.5
2115/96 8.4 ----5.3 200 84
2/16/96 8.7 4.3 190 81
2/22/96 5.2 1.8 13 3.4 14 240 240
2/28/96 7.4 1.3 120 77 8
2/28/96 6.4
3/8/96 6.7 95 30
4/3/96 6.6 160 39
5/3/96 5.4 16 63 200 0.91
6/5/96 5.2 2.5 230 46
8/1/96 5.9 I 10 5
11/7/96 5.8 230 ··-·--·--3/12/97 76 ------5/14/97 6.2 150
LO Efnucnt 2/13/96 ·----2/14/96
2/14/96 II
2/15/96
2/16/96
2/22/96 5
2/28/96
3/8/96
4/3/96
5/3/96
8/1/96 13 0.56
10/1/96 11
11/7/96 3.4
12/5/96 35 19
1/6/97 6
3/12/97 70
4/8/97
5/14/97
Remediation Perfonnance Standard 2.8 1000 400 50 1000 50 5000 5
Note; A blank means below detection limit
- - - ---- - ---- --- - - --
Location (ug/L) (ug/L)
utv1SA Influent 2113/96 15 14 19 16 5.9 25
2114196 I. I 14 11 10 7.3 7.2 JO
2114196 II 14 II 17 6.1 17
2/15/96 12 14 II 18 5.9 16
2116196 7.5 21 17 14 9.7 25
2117196 9.7 18 16 II 7 24
2/22/96 I.I 10 17 16 15 7.6 25
2128196 9.8 16 13 12 5.8 21
3/8/96 7.6 JO JO 7.7 4.1 16
413196 5.5 16 8.5 7.4 5.4 18
5/3/96 4.8 12 6.9 5.7 12
6/5/96 8.7 22 6 6 13
711196 3.8 II 6.9 4.8 4.3 12
7/30/96 7.9 15 10 6.4 4.2 13
1117196 7.2 9.2 7.5 2.3 3.4 JO
214197 3.0 27 7.8 2.3 8.8 15 (DUP) 214197 2.4 25 6.2 1.8 7.9 14
5112197 3.8 26 16 8.9 5 22
(DUP) 5/ 12/97 4.6 21 16 8.2 3.7 18
UMSA Effluent 2113196
2114196
2114196
2115196
2116196
2117196
2/22/96
2128196
318196
413196
513196
615196
711196
7130196
914196
1011196
1117196
12/5196
1/6197
214197
3112197
418197
5112197
Remediation Perfonnance Standard 3500 7 70 200 2.8
Nole: A blank means below detection limit
DUI' -duplicote
- - - - - --- - -- - - --- -- -
(ug/L) (ug/L) (ug/L) (ug/L)
ur-..tSA Influent 2/l 3/96 140 300 55 3.5 21
2/14/96 1.5 I JO 180
2/14/96 110 160 20
2/15/96 1.3 100 140 -------2/16196 120 160 0.22
2/17/96 I JO I JO
2/22/96 120 65 ---2/28/96 130 ---52 7
3/8/96 130 41 ---4/3/96 I JO ---27 8.2
5/3/96 97 21
6/5/96 I. I 3.6 130 19 5
7/1/96 II 110 13 5
7/30/96 4.5 130 13 6 ---11/7/96 2 140 9.8 10 ---2/4/97 150 24 36 (DUP) 2/4/97 140 17
5/12/97 120 68
(DUP) 5/12/97 150 55 5
Ul'v!SA Eflluent 2/13/96 16 150 330 74 4.2 57 2/14/96 I JO 190 20
2/14/96 I JO 160
2/15/96 JOO 140
2/16/96 130 170 0.26 18 2/17/96 120 120
2/22/96 120 70
2/28/96 130 51
3/8/96 120 37
4/3/96 I JO 27 5
5/3/96 120 26
6/5/96 2.9 130 22 6 7/1/96 12 I JO 14 ---7/30/96 200 I JO ---41 9.2 23 9/4/96 II 170 68 26 66 16
10/1/96 130 13 0.47 24
I 1/7/96 140 13 26
12/5/96 170 17 5
1/6/97 200 46 25 3.5 120 2/4/97 1600 29 8 ---3/12/97 130 30
4/8/97 200 30 7 5/12/97 12 210 95 35 JOO
Remediation Performance Standard 1000 50 1000 50 5000 5 15 I.I
Note: A blank means below detection limit
DUP -duplicate
--- - - - - ----- --- -- - -
Samele Date Chloroform I, I -Dichlorocthanc l,l -Dichlorocthcnc Cis/1rans-I ,2-Dich!oroethene Methylene chloride Tetrachlorocthcne I, 1, I-Trichloroethane Trichlorocthvlcne TolLJcne Location (ug/L) (u"fl) '" ) (, ) (, ) (u~") (u1>/I.) {ull/L) '" )
UM Influent 2/21/96 16 J_ \ I.I 4.6 4.6 II \J
2/22/96 10 J.9 LS ,., ,_2 12 16
112V96 6 4_\ 1.6 5.8 4 8 12 \j
2113196 3 4' 1.6 6.4 4.S 12 12 2124/96 1.4 4.6 1.8 6.4 6 14 9.7 2/25/96 !.2 2.2 66 6.9 \j 9.2
2128/96 ) ' '8 1.4 86 ' \4 2.9
J/S/96 4.7 I 8.6 3.8 12
J/16196 '' 1.8 9.2 4.6 12
4/3/96 4.4 1.6 6.6 ' 10
6/5/96 4.9 1.8 7.7 9.8 J.2
711196 l.8 I.I 6.1 3.) 7.6 7130/96 ,.1 2.1 8.6 ].] 9.8
I tn/96 ') 1.9 6.6 2.J 8.)
2/4/97 ,., 1.6 7 2.5 8.2 5/12197 II 2., 1.8 4.5 ,.1
LM Influent Y.'J/96 17 \j ,., 2.1 I.I 7.6 2.2 9) 217.2196 \j 22 8.4 ]_] L7 II J.2 12 2122196 14 26 9.1 4.4 2 14 J.J 15
2/23/96 I) 29 II ,.9 2.1 \j J.6 18 2n4196 8.9 JO \) 4.9 2.7 17 '' 17 2/25/96 8.2 JI I) ' 2.6 17 4.4 \j 2128/96 ) J2 " 5.6 2.4 17 4 ,.2
3/8/96 9.5 1.6 " 2.5 I.I 3/16/96 8.1 1.8 2.4 3.4 1.4
4/3/96 7) 2.6 2.J I 4 4.7
5/3196 8.6 2.7 2.9 4.2 ,.6 6/5/96 . 12 4.7 ).4 5.) 4.9 46 7/J0/96 17 6.6 6.7 ,.1
----lln/96 II 3.J 2.2 5.2 ,,
2/4/97 1.6 9.8 2.1 2.4 4A J.7 (DUP) 214/97 LS 9.0 18 2.1 J.8 ).\
5/12/97 ') 2.4 6.4 2 8)
U/L Effiucnt 2/21196
2/22l96 1.8 16
2/22/96
2123196
21'.!4/96
2125196
2128/96
3/8/96
3/16196
4/3/96 1.8 1.6 1.9 5/3/96
6/5/96 2.1 7/1/96
7/30/96
9/4/96
10/1/96
I tn/96
12/5/96
1/6197
2/4/97
3/12/97
4/8/97
5/] 2/97
Remediation PerfomunC<: Standard I 3500 7 70 5 I 200 2.8 1000
No1e, A blanl,. meant below dclcelion !i:ni,
ll\!I' -J"Phoaie I
- - ---- - - - ---- - - - - - -
-Location (ug/L) (uwl.) {u~n) (ug/L) (ug/L) (mg/L)
UM Influent 2/21/96 58 140 I] 12
2122/96 39 130 7.2 7
2122196 36 120 ,.,
Y2.3/96 JI 110 <.5
2/24196 30 110 ) 6
2/25/96 28 110 JA
2/28/96 18 '° 3/8/96 13 so
3/16196 20 so
4/3/96 9,3 26 J lO ----615196 22 13
7/1/96 ---7/30/96
I tn/96
2/4/97 36
5/12/97 12
LM lnfluem 2121/96 68 110 120 5.1 15
2/22/96 70 120 120 5.6 5
2/22/96 77 1]0 120 5.5
2/23/96 81 ''° 130 5
2/24/96 86 160 160 ,,
2/25/96 86 160 160 3.2 ----2/'28/96 100 150 240 J.J
3/8/96 72 52 7 ---3/16/96 SJ 57 -4/3/96 72 " 7 ----5/J/96 " JI 27 ----615196 " " 5 ----7/30/96 20 6 -----! 1/7/96 " ----2/4/97 H 19
(DUP) 2/4/97 H 16
5/12/97
U/L Effiuent 2121/96 59 100 98 ' 2/22/96 130 70 120 120 5.2
2/22/96 72 120 120 5.7
2/23/96 80 ''° 130 ,.,
2/24196 83 150 150 J.7 ----2/25/96 90 160 170 J.6
2128/96 32 59 8
3/8/96 39 56
3/16/96 JI 51 ----4/3/96 " " J.6 lO
5/3/96 Ji lO 21
6/5/96 7.5 ----7/1/96
m0/96
9/4/96
10/1/96 " 1 !/7/96
12/5/96
1/6/97
214/97 39 8
3/\2/97
4/8/97
5112191
Remediation Perfom1ancc Standard so IOOO so 5000 15
No1e, A bl•nl< mean, below dc:!c<:lion Jim.i,
DUI• • duplin!c I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Well
Number
Upper
Dockery
MW 15*
MW ISA
MWl8
M\1/20
MW25*
UD-1
t
i
I
Date
2/12/96
2/14/96
2/15/96
2/23/96
2/28/96
5/2/96
6/5/96
7/1/96
7/31/96
11/8/96
2/5/97
5/12/97
2/12/96
5/2/96
6/5/96
7/1/96
7/31/96
11/8/96
2/5/97
5/12/97
2/12/96
2/14/96
2/15/96
5/2/96
6/5/96
7/1/96
7/31/96
1118/96
2/5/97
5/12/97
2/12/96
2/14/96
2/15/96
5/2/96
6/5196
7/1/96
7131/96 I
1118196 I
2/5/97
5/12/97
2/12/96
2/14/96
2/15/96
2/23/96
2/28/96
5/2/96
6/5/96
7/1/96
7/31/96
11/8/96 I
2/5/97
5/13/97 I
6/5196
7/1/96
7/31/96
11/8/96
2/5/97
5/13197
Surveyed Depth to Corrected
Casing Groundwater Groundwater
Elevation (ft) (ft) Elevation (fl)
257.10 36.47 no.63
257.10 36.96 no.14
257.10 37.43 219.67
257.10 38.80 218.30
257.10 37.07 no.03
257.10 38.08 219.02
257.10 37.04 no.06
257.10 38.76 218.34
257.10 40.25 216.85
257.10 38.56 218.54
257.10 37.45 219.65
257.10 37.07 no.03
257.29 34.77 222.52
257.29 36.02 221.27
257.29 35.96 221.33
257.29 36.89 220.40
257.29 38.20 219.09
257.29 36.16 lll.13
257.29 35.53 221.76
257.29 35.33 221.96
242.54 30.99 211.55
242.54 32.80 209.74
242.54 33.62 208.92
242.54 34.40 208.14
242.54 32.30 210.24
242.54 34.02 208.52
242.54 36.50 206.04
242.54 37.96 204.58
242.54 35.13 207.41
242.54 34.03 208.51
265.15 24.34 240.81
265.15 25.34 239.81
265.15 25.65 239.50
265.15 22.47 242.68
265.15 27.25 237.90
265.15 27.80 237.35
265.15 28.78 236.37
265.15 20.12 245.03
265.15 25.96 239.19
265.15 ! 24.95 I 240.20
227.33 26.90 200.43
227.33 26.79 200.54
227.33 26.83 200.50
227.33 27.80 199.53
227.33 26.09 201.24
227.33 25.43 201.90
227.33 25.55 201.78
227.33 26.26 201.07
227.33 27.38 199.95
227.33 26.29 201.04
227.33 25.27 202.06
227.33 23.77 203.56
251.50 81.78 I 169.72
251.50 43.30 ! 208.20
251.50 I 83.70 I 167.80
251.50 I 79.02 I 172.48
251.50 81.92 I 169.58
251.50 82.36 169.14
I
I Number Casing Groundwater Groundwater
Elevation (rt) (ft) Elevation (ft)
I Upper
Dockery
UD-2 6/5/96 251.42 38.27 213.15
7/1/96 251.42 38.91 212.51
I 7/31/96 251.42 41.15 210.27
11/8/96 251.42 41.06 210.36
2/5/97 251.42 75.03 176.39
5/13/97 251.42 78.95 172.47
I UD-3 615196 249.66 86.42 163.24
7/1/96 249.66 44.52 205.14
7/31/96 249.66 86.69 162.97
11/8/96 249.66 65.81 183.85
I 2/5/97 249.66 40.12 209.54
5/13/97 249.66 38.95 2I0.71
UD-4 6/5/96 239.07 92.60 146.47
7/1/96 239.07 35.82 203.25 I 7/31/96 239.07 92.37 146.70
11/8/96 239.07 83.45 155.62
215/97 239.07 93.40 145.67
I 5/13/97 239.07 94.10 144.97
UD-5 6/5/96 239.02 28.01 211.01
7/1/96 239.02 32.35 206.67
7/31/96 239.02 35.00 204.02
I 11/8/96 239.02 34.81 204.21
2/5/97 239.02 32.15 206.87
5/13/97 239.02 30.59 208.43
UD-6 6/5/96 240.91 29.60 211.3 I
I 7/1/96 240.91 34.20 206.71
7/31/96 240.91 32.79 208.12
11/8/96 240.91 58.25 182.66
2/5/97 240.91 56.03 184.88
I 5/13/97 240.91 30.04 210.87
UD-7 6/5196 255.56 33.67 221.89
7/1/96 255.56 26.35 229.21
7/31/96 255.56 24.78 230.78
I 11/8/96 255.56 16.21 239.35
2/5/97 255.56 80.73 174.83
5/13/97 255.56 60.14 195.42
UD-8 6/5/96 259.43 34.43 225.00
I 7/1/96 259.43 40.21 219.22
7/31/96 259.43 37.50 221.93
11/8/96 259.43 34.24 225.19
5/13/97 259.43 JJ.61 225.82
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I Number I Groundwater Groundwater
(ft) Elevation (ft)
I Lower
Dockery
MW 16* 2/12/96 159.97 31.18 128.79
2/14/96 159.97 31.40 128.57
I 2/15/96 159.97 31.72 128.25
2/23/96 159.97 32.87 127.10
5/2/96 159.97 32.70 127.27
615196 159.97 31.79 128.18
I 7/1/96 159.97 31.89 128.08
7/31/96 159.97 33.48 126.49
11/8/96 159.97 33.45 126.52
2/5/97 159.97 30.13 129.84
I 5113/97 159.97 33.01 126.96
MW24* 2/12/96 132.99 5.74 127.25
2/14/96 132.99 5.75 127.24
2/15/96 132.99 5.95 127.04 I 2/23/96 132.99 6.90 126.09
2/28/96 132.99 6.15 126.84
5/2/96 132.99 6.56 126.43
I 6/5/96 132.99 6.35 126.64
7/1/96 132.99 6.75 126.24
8/1/96 132.99 6.91 126.08
11/8/96 132.99 7.06 125.93
I 2/5/97 132.99 5.44 127.55
5/13/97 132.99 6.65 126.34
LD-1 615/96 161.14 32.71 128.43
7/1/96 161.14 33.52 127.62
I 7/31/96 161.14 46.27 114.87
11/8/96 161.14 56.64 104.50
2/5/97 161.14 31.13 130.01
5113/97 161.14 56.46 104.68
I LD-2 6/5/96 154.80 26.93 127.87
7/1/96 154.80 26.98 127.82
7/31/96 154.80 35.50 119.30
11/8/96 154.80 55.39 99.41
I 2/5/97 154.80 25.28 129.52
5/13/97 154.80 54.45 100.35
LD-3 6/5/96 150.02 22.64 127.38
7/1/96 150.02 22.70 12732
I 7/31/96 150.02 27.75 122.27
11/8/96 150.02 35.18 114.84
2/5/97 I 150.02 20.97 129.05
5113/97 150.02 34.81 115.21
I LD-4 615196 148.16 20.67 127.49
7/1/96 148.16 20.83 127.33
7/31/96 148.16 24.50 123.66
11/8/96 148.16 29.59 118.57 I 2/5/97 148.16 18.96 129.20
5/13/97 148.16 29.08 119.08
LD-5 6/5/96 168.03 26.49 141.54
I 7/1/96 168.03 34.66 133.37
7/31/96 168.03 45.48 122.55
11/8/96 168.03 45.86 122.17
2/5/97 168.03 25.51 142.52
I 5113/97 168.03 50.26 117.77
I
I
I
I Well Dale Surveyed Depth to Corrected
Number Casing Groundwater Grouodwater
Elcv:1tion (ft) (fl) Elevation (ft}
I i\f:1con Source Arca
MW2 2/12/96 231.39 37.20 194.19
4/2/96 231.39 38.33 193.06
5/1/96 231.39 38.78 192.61
I 6/5/96 231.39 38.96 192.43
711196 23 I .39 40.52 190.87
8/1/96 231.39 43.21 188.18
11/8/96 231.39 41.32 190.07
I 214197 231.39 38.83 192.56
5112197 231.39 34.71 196.68
M\V2A* 2112/96 230.83 37.45 193.38
2/14196 230.83 37.56 193.27
I 2/23196 230.83 39.78 191.05
2/28196 230.83 39.00 191.83
511196 230.83 38.68 192.15
6/5196 230.83 39.18 191.65 I 7/1196 230.83 40.37 190.46
7/30/96 230.83 43.57 187.26
11/8196 230.83 40.91 189.92
I 214/97 230.83 38.70 192.13
5112/97 230.83 35.06 195.TT
M\V3 2112196 220.67 26.60 194.07
5/1/96 220.67 28.35 192.32
I 615/96 220.67 28.16 192.51
7/1196 220.67 29.86 190.81
811196 220.67 30.01 190.66
1118196 220.67 28.57 192.IO
I 2/4/97 220.67 26.03 194.64
5112197 220.67 27.50 193.17
MW5 2/12196 234.51 37.62 196.89
412196 234.51 37.94 196.57
I 511196 234.51 38.02 196.49
6/5196 234.51 38.00 196.51
7/1/96 234.51 39.69 194.82
811196 234.51 39.50 195.01
I 11/8196 234.51 37.17 197.34
214197 234.51 35.29 199.22
5/12/97 234.51 33.60 200.91
~vl\V 6 2/12/96 237.13 39.79 197.34
I 412196 237.13 41.61 195.52
l/1/96 237.13 41.90 195.23
615/96 237.13 39.05 198.08
7/1196 237.13 41.72 195.41
I 7/30/96 237.13 44.27 192.86
1118196 237.13 44.05 193.08
2/4197 237.13 39.08 198.05
I 5/12197 237.13 38.53 198.60
MW 7 2112196 228.41 35.57 192.84
4/2/96 228.41 36.23 192.18
511/96 228.4 l 36.63 191.78
I 615196 228.41 37.05 191.36
7/1196 228.41 38.32 190.09
811196 228.41 38.26 190.15
1118196 228.41 38.69 189.72
I 2/4/97 228.41 36.60 191.81
5112197 228.41 33.34 195.07
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-Number Casing I Groundwater Groundwater
Elevation (ft) I (ft) Elevation (ft)
i\lacon Source Arca I I
MW8 2/12/96 ' 234.54 I 39.98 I 194.56 ' 4/2/96 234.54 I 40.07 194.47
5/1/96 234.54 41.01 193.53
6/5/96 234.54 41.51 193.03
7/1/96 234.54 43.26 191.28
8/1/96 234.54 43.88 190.66
2/4/97 234.54 42.76 191.78
5/12/97 234.54 37.15 197.39
MW8A 2/12/96 234.44 44.83 189.61
4/2/96 234.44 45.53 188.91
5/1/96 234.44 45.81 1&8.63
615196 234.44 45.73 1&8.71
7/1/96 234.44 49.12 185.32
8/1/96 234.44 46.92 187.52
2/4/97 234.44 44.27 190.17
5/12/97 234.44 44.93 189.51
MW9* 2/12/96 254.08 46.60 207.48
2/14/96 254.08 46.70 207.38
2/15/96 254.08 47.68 206.40
2/23/96 254.08 44.03 210.05
2/28/96 254.08 46.04 208.04
5/1196 254.08 43.55 210.53
6/5196 254.08 42.89 211.19
7/1196 254.08 42.84 211 .24
7130196 I 254.08 42.30 211.78
I 1/8196 254.08 40.65 213.43
214197 254.08 41.68 212.40
5/12197 254.08 I 41.57 212.5 I
MW JO 2/12196 265.51 41.03 I 224.48
2/15196 265.51 I 40.88 224.63
4/2196 265.51 36.98 228.53
511/96 265.51 35.76 229.75
6/5196 265.5 I 35.90 229.61
7/1196 265.51 35.96 229.55
7130196 265.51 35.98 229.53
1118196 265.51 33.3 I 232.20
21'1/97 265.51 34.13 231.38
5/12197 265.51 33.64 231.87
MW II' 2112196 271.92 30.72 241.20
2123196 271.92 31.00 240.92
2128196 271.92 30.00 241.92
5/ 1/96 i 271.92 30.31 241.61
615196 I 271.92 I 3 I .41 240.5 I
711196 I 271.92 32.92 239.00
7130196 271.92 34.42 237.50
1118196 271.92 27.60 244.32
214197 I 271.92 27.26 244.66
I 5112197 I 271.92 25.72 246.20
M\VIIA 2/12196 270.28 30.22 240.06
412196 270.28 27.05 243.23
511/96 270.28 28.05 242.23
615/96 270.28 30.62 239.66
7/1196 I 270.28 J?_Jj 238.13
7130196 I 270.28 33.11 237.17
11/8/96 i 270.28 I 27. !5 243.13
I 214197 I 270.28 I 26.94 243.34
I 5/12197 I 270.28 I 25.35 244.93
I I I I
I
I Number Casing Groundwater Groundwater
Eleva lion (ft) (ft) Elevation (ft)
I i\lacon Source Arca
MW 19* 2/12/96 236.89 38.49 198.40
2/14/96 236.89 38.82 198.07
2/23/96 236.89 40.90 195.99
I 2/28/96 236.89 40.50 196.39
5/1/96 236.89 38.44 198.45
6/5/96 236.89 37.91 198.98
7/1/96 236.89 39.23 197.66
I 7130/96 236.89 )9.65 197.24
11/8/96 2)6.89 37.10 199.79
2/4/97 236.89 35.33 201.56
5/12/97 236.89 33.37 20).52 I Uiv!S-1 6/5/96 238.96 44.15 194.81
7/1/96 238.96 44.70 194.26
7/30/96 238.96 58.60 180.36
I 11/8/96 2)8.96 58.88 180.08
2/4/97 238.96 39.85 199.11
5/12/97 238.96 40.80 198.16
UMS-2 6/5/96 236.31 64.75 171.56
I 7/1/96 236.31 57.60 178.71
7/30/96 236.31 64.58 171.73
11/8/96 2)6.31 65.40 170.91
2/4/97 236.3 I 62.15 174.16
I 5/12/97 236.31 37.95 198.36
UMS-3 6/5/96 235.75 43.46 192.29
7/1/96 235.75 72.78 162.97
7/30/96 2)5.75 72.87 162.88
I l 1/8/96 235. 75 73.13 162.62
2/4/97 235. 75 42.68 193.07
5/12/97 235.75 71.80 163.95
UMS-4 6/5/96 236.53 75.66 160.87
I 7/1/96 236.53 76.58 159.95
7/30/96 236.5) 76.98 159.55
11/8/96 236.53 76.44 160.09
2/4/97 236.5) 36.60 199.93
I 5/12/97 236.53 33.55 202.98
Ui\lS-5 6/5/96 257.62 82.55 175.07
7/1/96 257.62 81.00 176.62
7/30/96 257.62 82.87 174.75
I 11/8/96 257.62 79.92 177.70
2/4/97 257.62 82.95 174.67
5/12/97 257.62 41.49 216.13
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-Number Casing CroumJwater Groundwater
I I Elevation (ft) (ft) Elevation (ft)
Upper I I I
Macon ' I I I
MW21* 2/14/96 I 155.52 14.52 141.00
2/23/96 155.52 15.60 139.92
2/28/96 155.52 14.65 140.87
5/2/96 155.52 14.38 141.J4
615196 155.52 15.47 140.05
7/30/96 155.52 7.02 148.50
1117196 155.52 14.62 140.90
2/4/97 155.52 14.48 141.04
5/12/97 155.52 14.44 141.08
MW 23* 2/14/96 155.54 4.45 151.09
2/23/96 155.54 5.73 149.81
2/28/96 155.54 4.07 151.47
5/3/96 155.54 5.19 150.35
6/5/96 155.54 5.59 149.95
7/1/96 155.54 7.56 147.98
7/30/96 155.54 7.72 147.82
11/6/96 155.54 6.19 149.35
2/4/97 155.54 4.99 150.55
5/12/97 155.54 5.88 149.66
UM-I 6/5/96 183.68 37.01 146.67
7/1/96 183.68 36.47 147.21
7130/96 183.68 41. I 0 142.58
11/8/96 183.68 39.44 144.24
2/4/97 183.68 39.36 144.32
5/12/97 ' 183.68 40.46 143.22 I
UM-2 615196 I 194.13 43.02 151.11
711 /96 194.13 47.95 146.18
7/30/96 ! 194. 13 I 47.33 146.80
11/8/96 i 194.13 I 45.4 I 148.72
2/4/97 I 194. 13 45.51 148.62
5/12/97 I 194.13 46.24 147.89
UM-3 6/5/96 I 80.35 32.17 148.18
7/1/96 I 180.35 32. 18 148.17
7/30/96 ! 180.35 32.36 147.99
I 1/8/96 i 180.35 32.J I 148.04
2/4/97 I I 80.35 32.27 148.08
5112/97 I 180.35 32.25 148.10
UM-4 6/5/96 i 171.91 21.85 150.06
7/1/96 i 171.91 21. I 0 150.81
7/30/96 171.91 I 27.55 144.36
l 1/8/96 171.91 I 24.52 147.39
2/4/97 171.9 I I 25.62 146.29
5/12/97 171.91 I 31.98 139.93
UM-5 615196 I 68.32 11.77 156.55
7/1/96 168.32 12.13 156.19
7/30/96 168.32 16.92 151.40
11/8/96 I 68.32 13.85 I 54.47
2/4/97 I 168.32 I 14.92 I 53.40
5/12/97 i 168.32 16. I 5 152.17
UM-6 6/5/96 ' 173.05 I 1.72 I 61.33 ' 7/ 1/96 I 173.05 13.23 159.82
7/30/96 ' 173.05 17.58 155.47
11/8/96 I 173.05 I 14.40 158.65
2/4/97 173.05 I 14.79 !58.26
5/12/97 ! 73.05 I 15.26 I 157.79
UM-7 I 6/5/96 I 187.29 I 54.45 132.84
I 7/1196 187.29 I 54.58 132.71
7/30/96 i 187.29 54.59 132.70
11/8/96 i 187.29 55.00 132.29
2/4/97 I 187.29 54.73 132.56
5/12/97 i 187.29 I 55.34 I 131.95
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-Number Casing
I Elevation (ft)
Lower
Macon I I
MW 4 2/14/96
MW 12
MW 13''
MW 14
MW 141{
MW 22~
4/2/96
5/2/96
6/5/96
7/1/96
7/J0/96
11/8/96
2/4/97
5/12/97
2/14/96
4/2/96
5/2/96
6/5/96
7/30/96
11/8/96
2/4/97
5/12/97
2/14/96
2/23/96 I
2128/96 I
4/2/96
512196 I
615196
7/1/96
7/30/96
11/8/96
2/4/97
5/12/97
2/14/96
4/2/96
5/2/96
6/5/96
7/1/96
7/30/96
11/8/96
2/4/97
5/12/97
2/14/96
4/2/96
5/2/96
6/5/96
7/1/96
7/30/96
11/8/96
2/4/97
5/12/97
?/14/96
2/23196
2/28/96
5/2/96
615/96
111196 I
1130196 I
1118196 I
214197 I
I 5112197 !
184.21
184.21
184.21
184.21
184.21
184.21
184.21
184.21
184.21
171.98
171.98
171.98
171.98
171.98
171.98
171.98
171.98
171.98
188.67
188.67
188.67
188.67
188.67
188.67
188.67
188.67
188.67
188.67
188.67
177.]4
177.34
177.34
177.34
177.34
177.34
177.34
177.34
177.34
175.95
175.95
175.95
175.95
175.95
175.95
175.95
I 75.95
175.95
128.25
128.25
128.25
128.25
128.25
128.25
128.25
128.25
128.25
128.25
Groundwater Groundwater
(fl) Elevation (ft)
40.79 14].42
46.08 ll8. IJ
45.72 1]8.49
43.29 140.92
42.09 142.12
45.71 138.50
46.35 137.86
40.86 14l.l5
44.15 140.06
24.87 147.11
26.18 145.80
26.09 145.IJ<)
25.97 146.01
27.]7 144.61
27.55 144.4]
26.24 145.74
24.38 147.60
25.27 146.71
49.22 139.45
50.20 138.47
49.25 139.42
50.85 137.82
51.38 llJ.29
49.88 138.79
50.55 138.12
51.59 137.08
52.15 136.52
49.40 139.27
49.42 ll9.25
34.24 143.10
dcy dcy
dcy dcy
35. 19 142.15
dcy dcy
dry
dcy dcy
34.63 142.71
dcy dcy
34.50 141.45
38.81 137.14
39.27 136.68
]8.85 137.10
37.98 137.97
40.03 1]5.92
40.]9 135.56
35.60 140.35
38.74 137.21
5.73 122.52
6.76 121.49
5.59 122.66
6.87 121.38
7.05 121.20
6.78 121.47
2.31 125.94
6.96 121.29
6.03 122.22
6.80 121.45
I
I Number Casing Groundwater
Elc\'ation (fl) (ft)
I Lower
Macon
LM-1 6/5/96 175.68 69.79 105.89
7/1/96 175.68 38.61 137.07
I 7/30/96 175.68 69.78 105.90
11/8/96 175.68 70.04 105.64
2/4/97 175.68 36.12 139.56
5/12/97 175.68 68.90 106.78
I LM-2 6/5/96 157.20 62.06 95.14
7/1/96 157.20 25.08 132.12
7/30/96 157.20 58.36 98.84
1118196 157.20 62.16 95.04
I 2/4/97 157.20 25.98 131.22
5/12/97 157.20 63.50 93.70
LM-3 6/5/96 157.09 61.16 95.93
7/1/96 157.09 27.78 129.31 I 7/30/96 157.09 49.40 107.69
11/8/96 157.09 67.24 89.85
2/4/97 157.09 27.11 129.98
I 5/12/97 157.09 57.52 99.57
LM-4 6/5/96 166.84 68.60 98.24
7/1/96 166.84 37.72 129.12
7/30/96 166.84 56.91 109.93
I 11/8/96 166.84 74.86 91.98
2/4/97 166.84 36.82 130.02
5/12/97 166.84 67.80 99.04
LM-5 6/5/96 186.59 66.50 120.09
I 7/1/96 186.59 43.91 142.68
7/30/96 186.59 66.80 119.79
11/8/96 186.59 66.86 119.73
2/4/97 186.59 42.85 143.74
I 5/12/97 186.59 66.90 119.69
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
------- --- - -- - - --
Upper Dockcrv
MW\5 2/13196 22 280 120 26 511196 35 630 JO 170
7/)\/96 6)0 210 35 (DUP) 7131/96 '50 160 JJ 1 ln/96 29 1000 290
(DU?} I ln/96 1600 400
'1J5l97 62 1200 )80
5/12/97 480 160
1\1\Y 25 2/13/96 u I.I 512196
7/J l/96 1.2
11/7/96 L6 ~ I.I
5/13/97
Lower Doch ' ,\!\\' 16 2/13/96 57 29 68 4 ... ----------~ 5/2/96 56 29 73 l.8
7131/96 ,1 " ;o 2.2
l 1/7196 37 " 50 26 I.I L~~'l 11/7/96 J2 19 42 2 2 2/5/97 " 24 4.J 5/D/97 <8 J2 75 J.2 MW~-1 2113/96 ,.,
!QUP) 2113/96 8.5
Sf"J96 7.5
8/1/96 J.7 ,., " 5.2 1.7 20 ~ 7.1 12 2/5/97 26
5/ll/97 16
/-.Jaco11 Source Arca
1\1\V 2A 2/13/96 J.6 20 5< H 22 5f'>J96 2.8 \J 7.7 4.7 20 (DUP) 512196 J.4 18 9.3 6.5 26 7/J 1/96 II
I l/6/96 J \J 2.J 1.5 21
'21-1197 2.7 5.J 1, 2.7 L6 19
5/12/97 LB )6 3.7 5.5 12 :,.f\\' 9 2/13/96 120 25 I< 16 10 JS
5/2196 \JO 160 2J 160 5.6 7/J !/96 250 340 18 " 190
(\)_~~) 7/3 1/96 190 320 21 100
1 l/6/96 170 100 7 II 7.5 ~ 76 8.2 \J LB 2.6 I.J 4.2 IA 5/12/97 80 52 59 6.9 12 7.J 9 MWll 2/1-1/96 4.8
5/l196 4.5 8.7
7/30/96 5.J ,.,
11/61% LS ,., I.I '·' lJ.4197 S.S ,,
5112191 6.2 8 l',.f\\'19 2/\J/96 2!0E J.2 86 12 8.9 1.5 S.9 910E 4.1 (DL) 2/\J/96 240 100 660
--- -- - ---- - - - --- -
55 13 43 17 6.1 12 JOOE
(DL) 42 33 7.8 43
Si 89 48 25 34 29
14 110 120 16 44 21
250 120 32 75 26
9.7 14 46 8.2 7.4
Upper Macon
1'IW21 2/W96 l.1 12 6.4
5/2/96 2.l
7{30/96 1.2 5.J
11nf96 1.5 1.4 214197 18 7.1
5/12/97 Ll 7.7
:-.IW23 2/l 5/96 l.9 5.1 24
5/3196 2.S J.8 11
(DUP) 513196 2.8 ... 18 15
7/J0/96 l. l 6.J 20
I 1/6/96 4) 4.9 1.2 12
2/4/97 6.9 16 S.2 2.7 16 5/12/97 8.9 3.4 10 l.8 19 ------
Lower l,,lacon
MW 13 2/14196 80 25 ,.9 2.7 9JE 14 _1_.2_ (DL) 2/14/96 76 lO 4.9 85 12
5/2/96 6) IS 13 47 180 7130196 88 " 67 5.2 2.5 ---
11/6/96 LS 66 17 2.3 " ,.8 1.4 2/4/97 11 12 l.J 1.2 so 5.4 1.2 5/12197 99 29 2.2 85 6.8 MW22 2/14196 5.5 6) 14 l.2 l.1
5nt96 l.6 5.l 1.4 L7 2.5 ------
7/30/96 2.2 ,.4 LS 18 2.3 11/6/96 l.1 )A 19 ,.,
214/97 ,.1 5.6 2.7 '·' ------
5112/97 H 6.5 2.9 4.7
Rcm~diation Performance Standard JSOO 70 200 2.8 1000
Nole: A blank rne;inJ below delecllcn llmll
DUP -duplkalo
DL -diluclon
-- - --- -- ----- - - - - -
150 190 J9 JA
5/2/96 160 J60 24 4.0
7/J 1/96 13 140 180 JS 990 0.0047 " (DUP) 7/31/96 140 180 JI 1070 4 8 65 ----------J !/7/96 140 200 430 J.5 9
(DUP) l ln/96 140 170 340 2.J
2/5/97 260 21 160 270 200 24 1100 3.0 JO
5/12/97 120 230 92 6 J 260 1.6 II MW 25 2/13/96 160 180 22 44 -------------------5/2196 10 IJO 4J 28 16
7/31/96 IJO 57 ------2J ---l 111/96 140 110 20 45 ------2/5/97 1200 77 31
S/13/97 IJ 110 22 15
Lower Dockerv
,\1\V it, 2/13/96 J4 270 1100 61 100 150 II 2000
5/2/96 ----43 J 10 ------[JOO 70 120 150 12 1800
7/31/96
' 180 1100 6 8 5100 260 490 660 0,94 62 5300
I !n/96 95 830 3200 160 270 390 0.47 )8 2100 -------(DU?) I !/7/96 89 780 2800 160 250 340 0,45 44
2/5/97 24 1700 670 41 62 1100 9.9 J60
5/!3/97 ll 190 810 52 77 92 II 560 M\\'24 2/13/96 56 320 3500 40 130 2JO 32 1100 (DUP} 2/lJ/96 51 370 ---3700 140 ---
----250 28 19 1000
5/2/')6 65 ---2400 15
8/1/96 86 ---2500 25 " I \/7196 82 2700 ----------58 2/5/97 94 2500 49 5/13/97 89 2500 "
Macon Source Aru
1•1\\'2A 2/13/96 190 140 l4 " --------5/2/96 !50 ------------26 7 ' -------··--------------------------(ll\J(') 5/2196 140 19
7131/96 -------1:::0 -------------25 J l 15
! 1/6/96 110 I) ------
2/4/97 100
5/l :!/97 94 ---6 ------------
,\IW9 2/IJ/96 !60'F3:! ~ 7400 6.1 7800 1800 500 790 2.6 JS 890
5/"J96 98 190 JOO JJOO 5600 520 140 210 12 1700
7/J l/96 210 1300 J900 290 78 140 12 8JO ----(DUP) 7/J l/96 120 170 110-0 4700 2JO 61 IJO 9.6 940 ---11/6/96 13 220 47 530 ---5100 84 ll 260
2/5/97 9.5 100 26 8100 4900 60 42 1400 5/12/97 68 1100 J900 51 J.5 490 MWII 2/14/96 160 85 30 3.2 400
5/2/96 93 I) 23 6.7 9
7/30/96 ! 120 J5 21 l2 -------11/6/96 90 10
2/4197 98 18 26 5J ---5/12197 86 9.7
MWl9 2/1)/96 24°F32 210 170 3900 87 ---0.51 5J
(DL) 2/13/96
-- - --- - --- ---- -
7/Jl/96 18 120 ~r-----+----+--,"40-+~13"0~1 2900 n 21
150 39
l---------ll~2cl5019c7:C--l------+----I--S2_0 __ 1_2_0 ____ _
5/12197 94
2500
2800
2600
-9-, ---------l----+---1---,1----1---~,~,---I
0, 12 13
U er /l.1acon
M\\'21 2/14196 6.J 9
1-----------11~1-------1-----,----1------f----0 7/30/96 j
20 9
-------,1~•-----1----+----1------,-~8c_3----l l----+----l-------l---+---+---c
11
---I
2w97 1----1----~ -----1--~~+--+--t----l---t----l---l--l---'-'---I
1---------11 5/12/97 1------+---+---1-----1 r----+----11----+---1------,------,
MW23 2115196 20 49 230 S.J 1200 120 260 28 0.22
l==-------11~5c/Jc/9c6~f-------O-----22_ _ ____!2_Q___ ___ , __ 900 ___ , _____ 8_7 ___ 1_50 __ , ____ t-~'c' -I
(DUP) 5/J/96 f------j---______ ---I----I '
)40
7/30196 79 35 3.5 38 ------11 1 l/6/96 >,-----1---------------1---4c,--1f-----t----t--=-+---+-=C--i------0---2"0------<
1-----------l'l--==+-----1--------e----t----,-~--+
-------ll--2~14cl~97'c-'l------l----------------l-1--5~2--I IS
1---------112!.!~,--------------------4! ------------==== 0.08 ==f----~lc4c0 ___ ,
Lower Macon
MW !J 2/14/% 27 550 870 65 120 17 1.7 910 (DL) 2/14/96
5/2/96 20 2100 780 1000 79 160 20 \.4
7/30/96 27 2000 960 5 5 1500 I 10 260 0.3 I JJ 0,53
MW22
11/6/96 ·~---__ ,_6_ 7)0
2W97 14 B?0
~-14 -
2/14/95 _ ----41 800
5('..196 13 230
520 760 60 110 ll 0.65
570 850 ---58 \JO 16 0.42
280 320 ---__ 5_2_ ---6.2 0.53
270 2200 160 260 J9
110 780 ---52 96 15
7/J0/96 13 260 7J ---650 96 15
11/6/96 170 270 J9 4.l
2/4197 11 260
5112/97 ~:=========l~======~==t11t=~l!--ij--jj---t==jit==t====4======+==:lf==+======~=i1==~=====t=====i====J,~ooi====J
93 760 93 12
67 480 67 9.J ---
Remedia1ion Pcrfonnancc Standard
Noice A blank 111c~n1 bclo\\ de1c,;1lon limll
,oo 3500 50 1000 50 100 50 5000 15 I.I 15'
DUP. dup!i,;;,.1c
DL • dilution
-- -
r1
I Sample Date Chloroform 1,2-Dichlo roe fhene Trichloroelhcne Tolume
Location mg/m3 mg/mJ mi:.fmJ m~m3
I VE-01 2/22196
6/5/96
7/1/96
11/8/96
OW-I 2/22/96 I 6/5196
7/1/96
11/8/96
OW-2
I OW-3 2!12/96 80
6/5/96
7/1/96 230
11/8/96
I OW-4
OW-5 2/22/96 380
6/5/96
11/8/96
SVE Exhaust 2/)4/96 45
I 2/15/96 43
2/16/96 73
413196
6/5196
I 7/1/96
8/1/96
215191
SVE Jnlel Line 615196 57
I 7/1/96
Upper Dockery Air Stack 2/16/96
4/3/96
6/5/96
7/1/96
I 8/1/96
11/8/96
2/5/97
5/12197
I Lower Dockery Air Stack 413196
8/1/96
I 1/8/96
5/12/97
I ,\facon Source Air Slack 2/16/96
4/3/96
5/3/96
6/5/96 50
7/1/96
I 8/1/96
1!/8/96
115197
5/12/97
I U/L Macon Air Stack 2/16/96
5/3/96
6/5196
7/1/96 850 29
8/1/96 I I J/8/96
2/5/97
5/12/97
Property Linc 2/16/96
I 4/3/96
513196
615196
7/1/96
I 8/1/96
l 1/8/96
215197
5/12197
I ,'fol~: A blank means bdow detection limit I
OW-2 and OW-4 Jr• nol connected 10 system I I
SY[: inlet line discontinued I I I I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
System
Upper Dockery
Lower Dockery
Month
Mar-96
Apr-96
May-96
Jun-96
Jul-96
Aug-96
Sep-96
Oct-96
Nov-96
Dec-96
Jan-97
Feb-97
Mar-97
Apr-97
May-97
Mar-96
Apr-96
May-96
Jun-96
Jul-96
Aug-96
Sep-96
Oct-96
Nov-96
Dec-96
Jan-97
Feb-97
Mar-97
Apr-97
May-97
TABLE 7
SUMMARY OF MASS voe REMOVAL ESTIMATES
MACON/DOCKERY SITE
RICHMOND COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
PAGE 1 OF 1
Average Total
Monthly Flow voe Pounds of voe
Volume Concentration Removed For Month
(gallons) (ug/L) (Pounds)
400,155 197 0.63
286,151 140 0.32
66,826 337 0.18
97,350 128 0.1
163,426 107 0.14
218,330 344 0.6
149,420 293 0.35
140,191 293 0.33
438,013 444 1.6
161,903 444 0.60
294,071 131 1.09
267,596 131 0.29
250,068 131 0.27
276,556 75.5 0.30
289,938 78 0.18
328,448 186 0.49
191,090 65 0.1
245,715 92 0.18
8,619 145 0.01
151,827 222 0.27
126,232 475 0.48
63,833 196 0.10
460,379 176 0.65
183,210 140.8 0.22
137,594 140.8 0.16
286,202 140.8 0.34
90,912 100 0.11
277,823 100 0.12
180,560 116.2 0.26
684,855 120 0.66
Cumulative voes
Removed
(Pounds)
0.63
0.95
1.13
1.22
1.37
1.97
2.33
2.66
4.3
4.88
5.97
6.26
6.54
6.84
7.02
0.49
0.59
0.77
0.78
1.05
1.53
1.63
2.28
2.50
2.66
3.00
3.11
3.23
3.49
4.15
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
System
Macon Source Area
U/L Macon
Month
Mar-96
Apr-96
May-96
Jun-96
Jul-96
Aug-96
Sep-96
Oct-96
Nov-96
Dec-96
Jan-97
Feb-97
Mar-97
Apr-97
May-97
Mar-96
Apr-96
May-96
Jun-96
Jul-96
Aug-96
Sep-96
Oct-96
Nov-96
Dec-96
Jan-97
Feb-97
Mar-97
Apr-97
May-97
TABLE 7
SUMMARY OF MASS voe REMOVAL ESTIMATES
MACON/DOCKERY SITE
RICHMOND COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
PAGE 2 OF 2
Average Total
Monthly Flow voe Pounds of voe
Volume Concentration Removed For Month
(gallons) (ug/L) (Pounds)
426,083 50 0.17
364,772 38 0.11
257,720 34 0.07
114,048 66 0.06
202,477 43 0.07
207,503 139 0.23
209,649 54 0.09
101,512 62 0.05
116,354 42.6 0.04
137,045 42.6 0.05
146,0~6 63.9 0.05
215,730 63.9 0.12
223,222 63.9 0.12
253,167 81.7 0.14
223,177 84 0.15
375,318 23 0.07
709,726 18 0.1
482,220 13 0.05
48,305 104 0.04
759,920 26 0.16
638,400 51 0.26
302,505 21 0.05
640,760 33 0.17
871,155 25.3 0.18
725,549 25.3 0.15
596,131 23.1 0.13
795,239 23.1 0.15
939,710 23.1 0.18
918,080 24.2 0.18
999,040 25 0.2
Cumulative voes
Removed
(Pounds)
0.17
0.28
0.35
0.41
0.48
0.71
0.8
0.85
0.89
0.94
0.99
I.I I
1.22
1.36
1.51
0.07
0.17
0.22
0.26
0.44
0.7
0.76
0.92
I.IO
1.25
1.38
1.53
1.71
1.89
2.09
--- ---
Samples
June July
Upper Dockery Influent
Upper Dockery Emucnt I I
Lower Dockery Influent
Lower Dockery Efnuent I I
t\·lacon Source Influent
Mncon Source Effluent I I
Upper l'vlacon Influent
Lower Macon Influent
U/L Macon Eftluent I I
12 wells
4 air stacks
SVE exhaust -Proporty line -4 SVE wells
ISampks I voes Total
: 8010/8020 Metals
9 Influent, effluent samples 9 9
MWl5 -UD I I
MW25 -UD I I
MWl6-LO I I
MW24 -LD I I
MW2A-MSA I I
MW9-MSA I 1
MWII -MSA I I
MWl9-MSA I I
MW21-UM I I
MW23 -UM I I
MWl3 -LM I I
MW22-LM 1 I
Total 21 21
QC samples
Duplicates 2 2
Trip I
MS/MSD 2 2
Total Samples 26 25
-- ----
Quarterly
August
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Mercury
7470
I
I
I
I
4
I
I
6
Table 8
Proposed 1997/1998 Sampling Schedule
Macon/Dockery Site
Richmond County, North Carolina
Quarterly
September October November December
I
I I I I
I
I I I I
I
I I I I
I
I
I I I I
I
I
I
I
I
TSS
160.2
9
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
21
21
-- - ---
Quarterly Quarterly
January February March April May
I I
I I I I I
. I I
I I I I I
I I
I I I I I
I I
I I
I I I I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I
6/27/97
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
07/17/1996 15:05 4044097893
STATE PR□

G
.

SECTION ID: 40i "147-5094
AES - A TLAlff A
JUL 17'96
PAGE 01
10:se No .ooa P.01
UNITED STA TES ENVIRONMENTAL Pfl.OTECTION AGENCY
I\EGION4
)4', COUJl'TI...IUC> ST'AEET.N.l.
ATLANTA. t.(OA.CIA )0)6'
July 17, 1996
4WD-N'SRB
Mr. Xenny Gulledge
Project coordinator
Crown, cork, and Seal Co.
100 Ev&ns Row
Cheraw, SC 29520
SUBJ: Ma.con/Dockery NFL Site Cordova, North Carolina
Dear Mr, Gulledge:
This letter 1s written in response to your June 2 6, 199 6 latter in which you requeeted a reduction in laboratory sampling, and your June 27, 1996 letter in which you requested a change to the O & M Schedule,
The tiret request: to discontinue sampling for isophorone, mercury, and cyanide in the influent and effluent ey11te111s is approved. The request to discont:inue sampling tor isophorone illld cyanide in the monitoring wells is aleo approved. However, ae your letter etates, four wells will still be 4-I'lalyzed for mercury, Please be mindful that At the end of the remediation, all wells will be Blllllpled tor all eontaminar.te or concern and all muet be below the performance standards before remediation can be considered complete.
'l'he second regueet to reduce Lhe influent aampl ing tram monthly to quarterly is approved, however, the etfluent will still be eampled monthly.
The third regueet to eliminate the air etack samplin9 of the vario-us groundwater treatment systems is denied. Thou9h rural, the Site is still located in a reeidential neighborhood, and as such, human health is a concern. Therefore, sampling o! all air scaclts should occur on a quarterly basis. The SVE inlet can be eliminated, but the exhaust and the property line samples should be co:lected on a quarterly basis. Sampling o! the SVE wslla can be r@duced to twice a year.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
07/17/1936 15:05 4044097893 AES -A TLAIH A PAGE 02
3TATE PRGG. SECTION ID, ao: 47-5094 JUL 17'96 .•~:59 No .004 P.02
The request to reduce the o & M site vie.itu from weekly to
monthly is denied and seems a bit premature. The June O & M report
etatss that the groundwater systems were only operational between
St and 33t. In addition, no mention is made in the report about
the succesis or failure ot adding the Clorox to the infiltration
galleries. Therefore, until the "bugs• are worked out, it would
seem prudent that the O & M visits continue on a weekly basis.
It'. you have any queecione, or would like to discuss this
rr.atter furt:her, please give me a call at 404/347-7791, ext 2065.
cc: David Lown, NC DEHNR
Norma Bichlin, CDM
Ronald Wallace, AES
Sincer
·-Gi lle S, Bennett
Remedial Project Manager
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
June 26, 1996
Ms. Giezelle Bennett
Remedial Project Manager
US EPA, Region IV
345 Courtland Street
Atlanta, Georgia 30365
Re: Maconffiockery Site -Cordova, North Carolina
Request on Reduction in Laboratory Sampling
Dear Ms. Bennett:
Since system start up in early February 1996, the Macon/Dockery Site Group has coilected many
rounds of influent and effluent groundwater samples from the four remediation systems located at
the Macon/Dockery site. Our evaluation of the laboratory analytical data indicate a number of
analytical parameters that have consistently been below the Remediation Performance Standard or
below the detection limit. The analytical parameters are discussed below.
Isophorone, a semivolatile analyzed by EPA Method 8270 has been consistently repo11:ed to be
below the detection limit in all influent and effluent system samples and in the compliance monitor
wells. A review of the Final Remedial Design Repo11 by RMT had three wells sampled in March
1993 that detected isophorone from 3 J pg/L to 4 J µg/L. The Remediation Perfom1a.nce Standard
is 70 pg/L.
Mercury by EPA Method 7470 has been detected once at the Macon Source Area in the influent at
0.22 pg/L and once in the effluent at 0.26 pg/L. These concentrations are an order of magnitude
below the Remediation Performance Standard of 1.1 pg/L. The other system samples have
consistently been reported by the laboratory to be below the detection limit. Twelve monitor wells
are sampled quarterly. Only four of the wells have detected mercury, with two of the wells above
the Remediation Performance Standard.
Cyanide by EPA Method 9010 has consistently been reported below the detection limit in all of the
system samples but was detected once at 0.019 ,tg/L in a duplicate sample of monitor well MW-24.
The RMT data from March 1993 were below detection limit for cyanide. The Remediation
Performance Standard for cyanide is 154 pg/L.
6525 The Corners Porkwuy, Suite 400 • Norcross, Georgio 30092 • Tel: [phone] I • Fax: [phone]
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Page 2
The Macon/Dockery Site Group requests that EPA Methods 8270, 7470, and 9010 be discontinued
in the sampling of the influent and effluent systems at Macon/Dockery because of the consistent
below detection limits or detections below the Remediation Performance Standard. Also, EPA
Method 8270 should be discontinued in the compliance monitor wells since the analyte target
compound for these samples has been consistently reported by the laboratory to be below the
detection limit. Mercury by EPA Method 7470 should be reduced to just the four monitor wells
(MW13, MW15, MW19, and MW23) that have had detections. Cyanide by EPA 9010 should be
discontinued in the compliance monitor wells since there has been just one recorded detection and
it was orders of magnitude below the Remediation Performance Standard.
The influent data has been necessary on a monthly basis to evaluate the concentrations of the
analytes entering into the remediation systems, The concentrations detected have been fairly
consistent in the different sampling events. The Macon/Dockery Group requests that the sampling
frequency of the influent be reduced to quarterly. The effluent will continue to be sampled momhly.
The Monthly Progress and O & M Report for May 1996, documented the mass VOC removal based
on the analytical results from the influent and effluent concentrations. If these total VOCs were
passed through the air stripper, the total pounds released to the atmosphere would be below the air
discharge permit. RMT in the Operation an<l lvlaintenance Plan calculated the air stripper air
emission rates and a worst case air emission rate_s from the soil vapor extraction unit. All values
were below the 40 pounds of VOC emissions per day and below the thresholds for individual air
toxins.
I
I
I
I
I
••
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Page 3
The calculations of the worst case off gas from the discharge stacks and estimating the mass VOC
removal based on the influent and effluent concentrations in the groundwater, demonstrate that the
off gases are below the North Carolina air pollution rules. The Macon/Dockery Site Group requests
that the air stack sampling at Upper Dockery, Lower Dockery, Macon Source Area, and
Upper/Lower Macon be discontinued. VOC mass removal rates will continue to be estimated using
the reported concentration of influent and effluent groundwater samples and the measured flow rates.
The property line sample and SVE inlet are also recommended for elimination. The SVE exhaust
will be continued on a quarterly basis. It is recommended that air samples from the SVE wells be
collected twice per year.
We appreciate your consideration in this matter.
Respectfully Submitted,
Kenny Gulledge
Project Coordinator
cc: Macon/Dockery Site Group Members
Paul Furtick, RMT, Inc.
Ms. Norma Eichlin, COM Federal Programs
David Lown, NC Super Fune! Section