NCD003446721_19960630_Celeanse Corporation - Shelby Fiber_FRBCERCLA SAP QAPP_June 1996 Revised Sampling and Analysis Plan-OCR

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Sampllng and Analysls Plan
Hoechst Celanese Corporation
Shelby, North Carollna
Document Control No. 026SB-0005b
March 1995
Revised July 1995
Revised June 1996
Kubal-Furr & Associates
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
II
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Contents
Page
1. 0 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
2.0 Monitoring Program .......................................... 2
2.1 Sampling Locations ....................................... 2
2.2 Analytical Procedures ...................................... 4
2. 3 Detection Limits . . . . . . . . . • . . . • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
2.4 Sample Collection and Analysis ............................... 5
3. 0 Quality Assurance Objectives . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
3 .1 Data Quality . . . . . . . . . . • . . . . . . . . . • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
3.2 Data Documentation and Evaluation ............................ 6
3.2.1 Field Measmements .................................. 7
3.2.2 Laboratory Data ..................................... 7
3.3 Data Quality Assessment .................................... 8
3.4 Data Storage and Retrieval .................................. 9
4.0 Sampling Procedures .......................................... 10
4.1 Pre-Sampling Activities .................................... 10
4.2 Equipment Decontamination . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
4.3 Well Purging ........................ · ................... 11
4.3.1 Monitor Wells ...................................... 11
4.3.2 Domestic Supply Wells ................................ 12
4.3.3 Extraction Wells .................................... 12
4.4 Sample Collection ........................................ 12
4.4.1 Monitor Wells ............ · .......................... 12
4.4.2 Domestic Supply Wells ................................ 13
4.4.3 Extraction Wells .................................... 13
4.4.4 Sludge Sampling .................................... 14
4.5 Quality Control Samples .................................... 14
4.6 Field Quality Control Sample Frequency ......................... 15
4. 7 Sample Preservation ...................................... 15
5. 0 Field and Laboratory Documentation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
5 .1 Field Documentation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
5.1.1 Field Logbooks and Sampling Logs ....................... 16
5.1.2 Sample Labels ...................................... 16
5.1.3 Chain-of-Custody ................................... 16
5 .2 Packaging and Shipping Protocols . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
5.3 Laboratory Documentation .................................. 18
Tables
Table I.. Quality Control Sample Frequency ............................. 15
i
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Figures
Figure 1. Monitor Well Locations ..................................... 3
Attachments
Attachment 1. Sampling Mattix
Attachment 2. Analytical Parameter Lists
Attac:hment 3. Laboratory Quality Assurance Deliverables and Report Format
Attachment 4. Well Construction Details and Water-Level Measurement Table
ii
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1.0 Introduction
Hoechst Celanese Corporation (HCC) has been conducting environmental investigations at
its Shelby, North Carolina facility since the early 1980's. HCC currently operates a long term
remedial action (LTRA) system designated as Operable Unit 1 (OU-1). OU-1 consists of two
ground-water extraction and treatment systems: the Inner Tier and the Outer Tier. OU-1 became
operational in August 1989. A second operable unit, OU-2, consisted of excavation, incineration,
stabilization and burial of sludges and other waste materials. The OU-2 remedial action was
completed in December of 1991.
As part of the investigations and remedial actions, a number of monitor and extraction wells
have been installed. Since implementation of the OU-1 remedy, ground-water monitoring has been
conducted to assess the effectiveness of the extraction well system and later, to assess the
effec1iveness of the OU-2 remedy. Samples are collected quarterly from a select group of monitor
wells and process points in the OU-1 extraction well and treatment systems.
Kubal-Furr & Associates (KF&A) originally prepared a sampling and analysis plan (SAP)
for the Shelby facility which was submitted to the EPA for review and approval in March 1995
(Document Control Number 026SB-0005). The SAP was prepared to describe the HCC sampling
program, data quality objectives, procedures for sample collection, preservation and handling, as
well as field and laboratory quality assurance and control procedures. The SAP was developed
using information from the EPA Region IV "Environmental Compliance Branch Standard
Operating Procedures and Quality Assurance Manual," February 1991. Data quality objectives
were developed using both EPA and in-house KF&A guidance documents.
The SAP was revised in July 1995 (Document Control Number 026SB-0005a) to correct
several minor omissions in the sampling matrix tables and to add newly installed replacement
extraction wells to the appropriate tables. The current revisions to the SAP (Document Control
Number 026SB-0005b) have been made to update the sampling matrix based on EPA-approved
revisions in the 1995 OU-1 Annual Report; to update the approved test methods; to update the
quality assurance deliverables and report format; and, to revise appropriate sections in the text
dealing with these items.
Kubal-Furr & Associates/Page I
Hot!chst CelaMse Corporation, Shelby, NC
Sampling and Analysis P/an/Rev. June 1996
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
2.0 Monitoring Program
The monitoring program at HCC has evolved during the investigations and the remedial
actions taken at the site over the past several years. Currently, selected wells and process points are
sampled each quarter to be analyzed for a constituent group consisting of total organic carbon
(TOC), volatile organics (VOCs), and ethylene glycol. The monitoring locations and parameters
analyzed during each quarterly sampling events are summarized in the table contained in
Attachment 1.
From time to time, samples may be added to, or deleted from, the quarterly matrix table in
Attac:hment 1. In the event a modification is required, the laboratory will be provided with specific
sampling instructions prior to the quarterly sampling event to assist with the preparation of coolers
and sample kits.
2.1 Sampling Locations
Figure 1 shows the locations of the extraction well and treatment systems and the location of
monitor wells which are sampled as part of the monitoring program. The following types of data
and samples are collected on a quarterly basis:
• All monitor wells, piezometers and extraction well water levels are measured each quarter.
• Selected monitor wells are sampled and analyzed quarterly for total organic carbon (TOC)
and/or volatile organics.
• Samples of Inner Tier and Outer Tier combined influent and effluent are collected each
quarter for analysis of TOC, ethylene glycol and/or VOCs.
• Samples of filter press (FP) and/or sequencing batch reactor (SBR) sludges are collected
and analyzed semiannually for the full TCLP list of parameters.
Kubal-Furr & Associates/Page 2
Hoechst Celanese Corporalion, Shelby, NC
Sampling and Analysis Plan/Rev. Juu 1996
I
I
• Monitor well
Legend
+
o Monitor well cluster
+ Inner Tier Extraction Well
♦ Outer Tier Extraction Well
c Domestic Supply Well
• Abandoned Inner ner Well
....
111111
♦
• A-39
PEW Extraction Well
Plezometer
Stream/Creek
HCC Bulldlng/Structure
Abandoned Outer Tier Well
~
r --'
PZ-11 ....
0
....
PZ-10
I
O GG-25
GG-39
GG-61
Kubal-Furr & Associates
~Environmental Consultants-
I I
0
I
Scale in Feet
400
Figure 1. Sampling Locations
Hoechst Celanese Corporation
Shelby, North Carolina
800
I
I 2. 2 Analytical Procedures
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Samples collected during routine monitoring are analyzed by one, or more, of the following
methods, and the list of analytes for each specific test method are summarized in Attachment 2. The
SW 846 Test Methods specified below are the most current updates approved by the EPA for
laboratory analyses. As future updates are promulgated and approved, the laboratory will be
directed to adopt the new updates but no revisions to the sampling and analysis plan will be
prepared unless substantive changes are necessary to make the document current
The ,;urrent test methods include:
• TOC (total organic carbon) by EPA Method 415.1.
• pH, temperature and conductivity in the field by EPA Methods 150.1, 170.1 and 120.1,
respectively.
• Full regulatory TCLP (toxicity characteristic leaching procedure) by EPA Methods
1311/8260A (volatile organics), 1311/8270B (semivolatile organics), 1311/8080A
(pesticides/PCBs), 1311/8150B (herbicides), and 1311/6-7000 series (metals).
• Volatile organics by EPA Method 82(i()A.
• Ethylene glycol by modified EPA Method 8015A.
2.3 Detection Limits
The detection limits specified for the required analyses will be the MCLs (maximum
contaminant levels), or the DEHNR Ground-Water Protection Standards in those cases where the
method specific detection limits can achieve these levels. It is anticipated that these detection limits
will be: achieved for the majority of the samples obtained. Actual reporting limits may be higher in
some samples for several reasons, including high concentrations of constituents and/or matrix
interferences.
It should be pointed out that to the extent possible, analytical test methods have been selected
so thai: the detection limits achieve State and Federal MCLs (maximum contaminant levels) or other
Kubal-Furr & Associates/Page 4
Hoechst Celaneu Corporation, Shelby, NC
Sampling and Analysis Plan/Rev. /UIII! 1996
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
applicable criteria. This has not been possible in several instances, specifically in the case of the
ground-water standards contained in North Carolina Title 15A, Subchapter 2L. A number of the
GA standards, for example, are in the parts per trillion range, and none of the analytical procedures
available can achieve these exceedingly low values.
2.4 Sample Collectlon and Analysls
HCC will subcontract a qualified sampling team and analytical laboratory that will be
responsible for implementing current sample collection and analytical techniques, methods and
procedur,~s as required by the more stringent of either DEHNR or EPA guidance or policy.
Kubal-Furr&: Associales/Page 5
Hoechst Celanese Corporatwn, Shelby, NC
Sampling and Analysis P/an!Rev. JUM 1996
I
I 3.0 Quality Assurance Objectives
I 3. 1 Data Quality
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
The data quality objectives (DQOs) to be achieved during the sampling and analysis program
will be a Level II or ill analytical level as described in Attachment 3. This analytical level produces
data with. similar detection limits to the CLP (contract laboratory program) but with somewhat less
rigorous quality assurance deliverables. These levels are suitable for all potential uses of the data
including risk assessment, site characterization, remedial design, and monitoring during
implementation of remedial actions.
KF&A has designed a list of deliverables to be supplied by the laboratory for the Level II and
ill DQOs. This list of deliverables is contained in Attachment 3, along with the specified repon
format and organization to be followed by the laboratory. This format will allow the data to be
validated in a more straightforward fashion than is permitted by a full CLP data package.
3.2 Data Documentation and Evaluation
The data collected will be properly documented by various methods. Field observations,
sampling activities, and laboratory activities are designed to ensure continuous integrity of both the
sample and its documentation. A detailed description of these procedures is contained in Section
5.0.
The data quality evaluation is used to assess the accuracy, precision and consistency of the data
collected during the monitoring program. The quality of the data generated will be assessed on the
basis of consistency, completeness, and laboratory performance.
Data, evaluation will take place at different times during the HCC monitoring. Prior to sample
collection, sampling and analysis procedures are developed and evaluated with respect to their
ability tt> provide appropriate, adequate, and technically acceptable data to meet project objectives.
During sample collection, sampling protocols may be evaluated by a field audit Sample collection
procedures, blank preparation, sample log books, field notebooks, field data sheets, sample
packaging and shipping procedures, chain-of-custody forms, and transport logs will be checked
for compliance with the specific procedures set fonh in the field sampling protocols. Accuracy and
Kubal-Furr & Associates!Pag• 6
Hoechst Celause Corporation, Sheli,y, NC
Sampling and Analysis Plan/Rev. June 1996
I
I consistency of data collection and documentation will be evaluated so that data quality objectives
are not compromised.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
3.2.1 !Field Measurements
Field QA objectives will be met by assuring that field systems audits are performed and that
instruments are properly calibrated and are pan of a preventive maintenance program. Measurement
data will be generated in many field activities that are incidental to collecting samples for analytical
testing or unrelated to sampling. These activities include, but are not limited to, documentation of
time and weather conditions; location and determination. of the elevation of sampling locations; and,
determin~ltion of depths in a borehole.
The general QA objective for such measurement data is to obtain reproducible and comparable
measurements to a degree of precision consistent with the data use. This is accomplished through
documenited use of standard procedures. These procedures are in various published documents and
have also been developed and maintained by laboratories.
3.2.2 Laboratory Data
The hboratory will perform in-house analytical data reduction and review of chemical analyses
under the: direction of the laboratory's technical staff, QA Supervisor, and Laboratory Project
Manager for this project. These individuals are responsible for assessing data quality and advising
HCC and KF&A of any data non-conformances with method-specific criteria.
A case narrative prepared by the analytical laboratory assessing data quality will be submitted to
the Laboratory Project Manager or designee with every data package prior to transmittal to KF&A.
Data reduction, review, and reporting by the laboratory will be conducted as follows:
• Raw data produced by the analyst will be reduced and checked by the analyst
• A data review specialist will independently review the data for attainment of quality control
criteria.
• Upon acceptance of the data package by the independent reviewer, a report will be
g,~nerated and sent to the Laboratory Project Manager.
Kubal-Furr & Associates/Page 7
Hoechst Celanese Corporalion, Shelby, NC
Sampling and Analysis Plan/Rev. June 1996
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Complete data reduction and reporting procedures will be those specified by the laboratory's
Quality Assurance Plan. The laboratory will prepare and retain full analytical and QC
documem:ation.
3.3 Data Quality Assessment
After completion of the field work, analytical data provided by the laboratory will be reviewed
and evaluated. The purpose of the review is to ensure that only scientifically useable data are
considered in preparing project related reports. Data review will be performed in accordance with
procedures in: "Contract Laboratory Program (CLP) Laboratory Data Validation Functional
Guidelines for Evaluating Organics" (USEPA, February 1993); "CLP Laboratory Data Functional
Guidelim:s for Evaluating Inorganics Analyses" (USEPA, February 1994), SW-846 and other
method specific QNQC requirements, and lab specific QNQC performance evaluation parameters.
Then: will be two levels of data review for the purpose of ensuring useable data. The first
review le:vel will be performed at the analytical laboratory in accordance with the lab's quality
assuranc1: plan. The second level of review will be for KF&A to assess the data as an external
check of the adequacy of the laboratory quality assurance program.
The assessment of the laboratory data will be accomplished under the direction of the KF&A
Project Manager and QA Officer. This review will begin with the case narrative, or method
conformance summary, supplied with each data package provided by the laboratory. The case
narratives and method conformance summaries will identify any problem areas encountered during
the analyitical process and contain the laboratory's assessment of the effect on data useability.
If any out of control data points or data omissions are identified, KF&A will confer with the
laboratory to correct data deficiencies before any data will be deemed acceptable. If data
deficiencies cannot be corrected, the data will be qualified following criteria in the National
Functional Guidelines. Recommendations to repeat sample collection and analyses may be made by
HCC and/or the KF&A Project Manager based on the extent of the deficiencies and their
importance in the overall context of the project. Resampling or reanalysis costs incurred as a result
of laboratory errors will be the financial responsibility of the laboratory.
Kubal-Furr & Associales/Page 8
Hoechst Celanese Corporation, Shelby, NC
Sampling and Analysis Plan/Rev. JIUU! 1996
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
3.4 D;ata Storage and Retrleval
A project file containing complete project documentation will be maintained by the KF&A
Project Manager or his designee. This file will include project plans, field logbooks, data records,
chain-of-custody records, analytical data packages provided by the laboratory including all QC
documentation, data review notes, pertinent references and literature citations, report notes and
calculatio:ns, operating summary repons, correspondence, and other relevant information.
Following data review and validation, the data will be entered by the laboratory into a computer
database to allow for efficient storage and retrieval. The data fields and format for data entry to be
used by the laboratory will be provided by KF&A. Data storage may include both historic and
L TRA sp::cific monitoring data. The database will consist of tables, maps, and data plots to be
developed. and revised as necessary to assist in data interpretation and presentation.
Kubal-Furr&: Associates/Page 9
H~chst CeiaMse Corporadon, SMlby, NC
Sampling and Analysis Plan/Rev. June 1996
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
4.0 Sampling Procedures
This section outlines general procedures which shall be followed during collection of ground-
water samples at HCC. Standardized procedures are required to ensure that representative samples
are collected and that the integrity of the samples is maintained throughout sampling and analysis.
4.1 P1re-Sampllng Activities
A complete round of water-level measurements will be made prior to the commencement of any
sampling activities. Upon arrival at each well site, the well cap or access port will be removed and
the water level allowed to stabilize under atmospheric pressure. The distance from the top of the
well casing (measuring point) to the water surface will be measured to within 0.01 foot using an
electrical sounding tape. Water-level elevations relative to mean sea level will be calculated by
subtracting the depth to water measurements from the measuring point elevations. This
information, along with other well construction details, are summariz.ed in Attachment 4.
Plastic sheeting will be placed around each well to prevent possible equipment contamination
during monitor well purging and sampling activities. Disposable latex, vinyl or other suitable
chemically resistant gloves will be worn during handling of the sampling equipment and during
sample collection. The monitor wells will be sampled in order from the least to the most
contaminated which, in most cases, will be from the downgradient to the upgradient wells.
4.2 Equipment Decontamination
Sample decontamination and cleaning procedures will be conducted in accordance with
procedur,:s presented in the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Region IV Standard
Operating Procedures and Quality Assurance Manual (SOP/QAM) as described in this section.
Non-dedicated sampling equipment will be decontaminated in the field using the following
procedun:s.
1. Rinse equipment with potable or distilled water immediately after use if possible.
2. W'ash equipment thoroughly with distilled water and a phosphate-free laboratory grade
de:tergent such as Liquinox. A brush may be used to aid in cleaning if necessary.
Kubal-Furr & Associalls/Page 10
Hoechst Celanese Corporation, She/fry, NC
Sampling and Anillysis Plan/Rev. /IJIII! 1996
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
3. TI1oroughly rinse equipment with distilled water.
4. Wrap equipment or store in a clean container to prevent contamination during transport.
Sampling equipment decontaminated prior to being transported to the site will be cleaned in the
same manner as described above. Sampling equipment to be used for collecting metals samples
will be rinsed with a 10 percent nitric acid rinse prior to the final distilled water rinse if cleaned in
the laborawry. Nitric acid rinses will not be conducted for equipment cleaned in the field.
4.3 W,ell Purging
4.3.1 Monitor Wells
Standing water will be removed from the monitor wells prior to collection of samples. The
recommended volume of water to be evacuated is three to five well volumes. One well volume of
water will be calculated by using the following formula.
V = 7.48 itr2h,
where: V = volume of standing water (gallons)
r = radius of well casing (ft)
h = height of standing water (ft)
1t = 3.14
7.48 = conversion factor (gallons/ft3)
Evacuation of the standing water will be performed by bailing or pumping. A majority of the
monitor w,:lls are equipped with bladder pumps which require compressed nitrogen for operation.
Other well; contain dedicated ballers used for evacuation and sampling. In the event a supplemental
pump is used, the pump or intake tubing will be thoroughly cleaned prior to being inserted in the
well. Tubing that will be in contact with ground water will be made of chemically resistant
material. The pump or tubing intake will be placed at the top of the water column and lowered as
the water level drops so that the water in the well casing will be completely and efficiently
removed. The pump or intake tubing will be removed before suction has been discontinued to
prevent water from draining from the pump or tubing into the well.
Kubal-Furr & Associales!Page I I
Hoechst Celanese Corporation. Shelby, NC
Sampling and Analysis Plan/Rev. JUN! 1996
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Prior to collection of ground-water samples, the monitor wells will be allowed to recharge
sufficiently to supply the necessary volumes of water. Wells that recharge slowly (those not filled
back to the static level within eight hours) will be purged completely at least once and then sampled
after the water level has recovered sufficiently to provide the necessary sample volumes.
4.3.2 Domestic Supply Wells
(All domestic supply wells in areas downgradient of the plant which were previously used for
potable purposes have been plugged back during a voluntary initiative extended by HCC to the
surrounding residents. Therefore, no domestic supply wells are currently being sampled. The
evacuation and sampling protocols described below are presented here only for completeness
should any domestic well sampling be required in the future.)
The domestic supply wells are equipped with submersible pumps that produce on demand.
Evacuatio,n of three to five well volumes is generally not practical for these wells, and the protocol
that has h~n followed is the pump the well for 5 to 15 minutes before collecting the sample.
4.3.3 !Extraction Wells
The extraction well systems generally pump continuously into a common header and then to the
respectiv1: Inner Tier or Outer Tier treatment system. As such, calculation of the evacuation
volumes is not applicable, and a sample is collected from the access port after allowing to run for
about five minutes.
4 .4 Sample Collection
4.4.1 Monitor Wells
Water samples will be collected initially for field measurements of pH, specific conductance
and temperature. Sample collection from monitor wells will be performed by using either a new,
decontaminated, or dedicated bailer made of stainless steel or Teflon, or, directly from any
dedicated, in-well sampling devices. Collection of the water sample from dedicated sampling
devices will be directly into the appropriate sample container following the manufacturer's
recommendations.
Kubal-Furr & Associllles!Page 12
Hoechst Celanese Corporalion, Shelby, NC
Sampling and Analysis Plan/Rev. June 1996
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
In the monitor wells without dedicated sampling devices, the transferring of the water from the
bailer into the sample bottles will be performed maintaining the integrity of the sample. Agitation of
the sample: during collection and displacement will be avoided to limit the amount of oxygen added
to the sample. The order in which the sample containers are filled will be selected considering the
volatilization tendency of the parameters. Samples that require the analysis of volatile organics will
be collected initially. Transferring of the sample will be accomplished by placing the bailer as close
as possibl,~ to the container to diminish aeration of the water. However, the bailer will not touch the
containen. in order to avoid cross contamination between sampling bottles or neutralization of
preservatives.
Samples requiring analysis for volatile organic constituents (VOCs) will be poured directly
from the bailer down the inner side of the vial until it is completely full and the water is mounding.
Zero heaclspace in the vial is required in order to minimize the possibility of volatilization of
organics. Paired VOC vials for each sample will be placed in two sealable plastic bags (one bag
inside the other) to avoid cross contamination.
In the event sampling for dissolved metals is required in addition to total metals, this will
require the collection of two aliquots of each sample. The first aliquot will be placed in the
appropriate container, the other will be field filtered using a low suction field apparatus with a 0.45
micron filler. The filtered sample will then be placed in an appropriately preserved container and
properly labeled.
4.4.2 Domestic Supply Wells
For the domestic supply wells, the spigot nearest the pump and holding tank (if present) is the
preferred sampling location and will be used whenever possible. The spigot will be turned on,
adjusted 1mtil a uniform flow of water is obtained, and allowed to run for 5 to 15 minutes to purge
the well casing and holding tank prior to sample collection.
At the time of sampling, the flow will be reduced to minimize to the extent practical any sample
agitation. The flow rate will be e~timated by timing the filling of a container of known volume, and
the pH, temperature and conductivity measured. The appropriate sample containers will then be
filled.
Kubal-Furr & Associaus/Pag• 13
Hoechst Celanue Corporation, Shelby, NC
Sampling and Analysis Plan/Rev. June 1996
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
4.4.3 Extraction Wells
Wate:r-quality samples are collected from the Inner Tier and the Oute:r Tier extraction system
during each quarterly sampling event to evaluate the treatment system effectiveness. The samples
collected are combined influent and effluent from the respective extraction well system. The
influent sample collection procedure consists of opening a sampling pon on the discharge line, and
collection of the wate:r sample directly into the appropriate sample container. The effluent samples
are collected following treatment and are collected at the discharge point of the carbon polishing
units.
4.4.4 Sludge Sampling
Samples of sequencing batch reactor (SBR) sludge are collected from a sample pon directly
into the sample containers. Samples of filter press (FP) sludge will be collected using
decontarainated stainless steel equipment Representative samples of FP sludge material will be
collected and placed directly into sample containers appropriate for the required analyses.
4.5 Quality Control Samples
Quality control samples will be collected in the field to supplement data generated by the
laboratoiry analysis of the collected samples and the method quality control samples. The field
quality control samples to be collected for this program are described below.
J:'m.--c:leaned Equipment Blanks are collected from sampling equipment that has been brought to
the site precleaned and ready for use. At least one equipment blank shall be collected for each
water and solid matrix analytical group. These blanks shall be collected at the beginning of the
sampling episode.
Field Cleaned Equipment Blanks are collected from sampling equipment afte:r the equipment
has been cleaned in the field, if applicable (see Field Quality Control Frequency table in section
4.6)
Top_ Blanks are required only if samples are to be analyzed for VOCs. They should be
prepared by the organization that is providing the VOC vials for sampling, and shall be filled
Kubal--Furr & AssociaJes/Page 14
Hoechst Celm,ue Corporation. Shelby, NC
Sampling and Analysis Plan/Rev. June 1996
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
with analyte-free water. The vials shall be placed in the same transport containers as the empty
voe vials. They must remain with the voe vials during the sampling episode and shall be
transponed to the laboratory in the same shipping container as the VOC samples. The trip
blank shall remain unopened for the entire sampling episode. A trip blank must be submitted
for each cooler that transports empty or full voe vials.
Eicl.d Duplicates are collected and analyzed for the same parameters as the associated samples.
A sufficient number of field duplicates shall be collected to enable the laboratory to analyze
each matrix for each analytical group.
4.6 Field Quallty Control Sample Frequency
The frequency at which the field quality control samples are collected is summarized in the table I below.
I Table 1. Quality Control Sample Frequency
I
I
I
I
I
I
No. of Pre-cleaned Field-cleaned Field
Samples Equipment Equipment Trip Blank Duplicate Blank Blank
lo+ minimum of 1 minimumofl one per cooler minimum of 1
then 5% of total then 5% of total then 10% of total
5-9 one* one* one per cooler one
<:5 one* one* one per cooler NR
* NOTE: For 9 or fewer samples, a pre-cleaned equipment blank m: a field cleaned equipment
blank is required. However, a field cleaned equipment blank is required if any equipment is
cleaned in the field.
4. 7 Sample Preservation
The commercial laboratory selected for analysis of the samples will provide the necessary I sample c:ontainers and preservatives. Generally, the laboratory will provide pre-preserved
containers; however, it will be the responsibility of the sampling team to ensure that the correct
I
I
I
container and preservative are used for the constituents requested for analyses. It will also be the
responsibility of the sampling team to identify in the water-sampling log the preservative and
Kubal-Furr & Associates/Page 15
Hoechst Celanese Corporation, SM/by, NC
Sampling and Analysis Plan/Rev. June 1996
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
containers used. After collection of samples, the containers will be placed in a portable ice cooler.
and main1:ained at 4° C.
Kubal-Furr & Assodales!Page 16
Hoechst Celanese Corporation, Shelby, NC
Sampling and Analysis P/an!Rev. Jwu: 1996
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
5.0 Field and Laboratory Documentation
5. 1 Fileld Documentation
Documentation of field and sample collection activities will include the use of field logbooks,
sample logs, sample labels and chain-of-custody forms. Photographs may also be used to
document field activities. Errors made during field documentation in the logbook, sample logs,
sample label, or chain-of-<:ustody forms will be crossed out with a single strike mark, initialed and
dated.
5.1.1 Field Logbooks and Sampling Logs
Sample custody will be documented by thorough record keeping. Sample logs will be
maintained for each sample collected regardless of the media (i.e., water, soil, sediment, sludge,
etc.). In addition, a field notebook will be maintained to document field activities. Sampling will be
documented in the field logs and on the sample logs as samples are collected. Relevant information
recorded will include: field measurements, sampling personnel, equipment used, weather
conditions, time and date of sampling, types of quality control (QC) samples collected, site
conditions, and special circumstances. When collecting water samples, data gathered during well
purging will also be recorded in the field log. All recorded entries will be made in indelible ink and
erasures will not be permitted. Corrections will be made by drawing a single line through and
initialing 1he error.
5.1.2 Sample Labels
Sample labels may be partially completed prior to mobilizing to the field with the following
information: project code number, sample identification number, analytical parameter(s), and
preservative. At the time of sampling, the sample labels are placed on the appropriate sample
containers and the sampling date and time added to the labels.
5.1.3 C:haln-of-Custody
All samples will be maintained in the custody of the sampling personnel during sampling
activities. At the end of each sampling day, samples will be recounted and the chain-of-custody
Kubal-Furr & Associales/Page 17
Hoechst Celanese Corporation. Shelby, NC
Sampling and Analysis P/an/Rev. June 1996
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
forms checked against the sample bottles and the sample field log entries before leaving the site.
Transfer of sample custody will be completed when a sampling team member signs the custody
form to relinquish custody and the receiving person signs the custody form to take custody. When
shipping the samples using common couriers (Federal Express, UPS, etc.) sample custody will be
transfem:d as described below.
1. A sampling team member will sign the custody form to relinquish custody.
2. The custody form will be placed in a scalable plastic bag, inside the sample cooler, on
top of the samples.
3. A signed custody seal will be placed on the cooler to insure the cooler is not opened
during transport.
4. Upon cooler receipt, the receiving person will break the custody seal, open the cooler,
document on the custody form that the custody seal was not broken during transpon
and sign the custody form to take custody of the samples. If the custody seal was
broken during transport the samples must be recollected.
All chain-of-custody forms received by the laboratory are signed and dated by the laboratory
sample custodian and returned with the original analytical data repon to the project manager. The
fully executed chain-of-custody, along with the field logs, will be maintained in the project file.
5.2 Packaging and Shipping Protocols
Following sample collection and documentation, the exterior of the sample containers will be
decontaminated and prepared for shipment to the laboratory. All samples will be classified as
environmc:ntal. The following packaging and shipping procedures will be implemented during field
investiga~ions.
• Labels will be marked legibly and accurately.
• Sample containers will be wrapped and packaged to prevent breakage.
• Samples will be packed in ice for shipping, where required.
Kubal-Furr & Associales!Page 18
HOt!chst CelilMst! Corporation. Shelby, NC
Sampling and Analysis PlanlRev. June 1996
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
/1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
• The chain-of-custody documentation will be securely sealed in the shipping container
wil:h the samples.
• Th•e cooler used for shipping will be properly marked for shipping, including ''This End
Up," total number of containers in shipment, and shipper's name and address.
• A custody seal will be placed on the cooler in a manner to indicate if tampering has
occ:urred.
5.3 l.aboratory Documentation
Upon receipt of the environmental samples, all samples will proceed through an orderly
processing sequence specifically designed to ensure continuous integrity of both the sample and its
document'ltion.
All samples will be checked for proper chain-of-custody records, broken or leaking sample
contain=,, proper label identification, and any associated discrepancies. If any samples arrive
leaking, broken, or the custody seal on the shipment cooler is not intact, the Laboratory Project
Manager and QNQ!:, Coordinator will be notified of the problem(s) immediately.
Any non-conformances discovered upon sample receipt and inspection (custody seals not in
tact, broken bottles, no COCs, no ice, etc.) must be reported to the KF&A Project Manager or QA
Officer immediately.
If no discrepancies are identified, the sample chain-of-custody record will be signed, and the
samples will then be assigned a unique laboratory identification number through a computerized
system which will be used to file and transfer all essential laboratory project information. The
system, coupled with an internal chain-of-custody procedure, will ensure that the samples are
appropriau:ly tracked from storage through the laboratory system until the analytical process is
complete. If a discrepancy in the chain-of-custody is identified, the KF&A QA Officer and
laboratory QA Officer will be contacted immediately. Upon completion of the analytical process,
the field chain-of-custody (or a signed copy) will be returned with the analytical data for inclusion
into the central or project file.
Kubal-Furr & Associates/Pag~ 19
Hoechst C~Iane~ CorporaJUJ11, Shelby, NC
Sampling and Allalysis Plan/Rev. June 1996
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Complete and accurate documentation of analytical and procedural information is an imponant
part of the program. These activities will be documented with the use of Standard Operating
Procedw-es (SOPs), a laboratory data management system, laboratory benchsheets, laboratory
notebooks, and orderly project files.
Laboratory benchsheets are used to document information from routine laboratory operation
including sample preparation and analysis. Benchsheets are used to ensw-e that information is
recorded in a complete and organized manner and that the analysis can be reconstructed, if
necessary.
· Infonnation typically recorded in laboratory notebook pages include methods of analyses,
laboratory ID numbers, matrices, initial and final sample weights/volumes, calculations, dilutions
and any observations or limitations due to matrix interferences. Each page in a laboratory notebook
is initialed and dated as information is entered.
A project file will be created by the laboratory for the project. The project file will contain all
documents associated with the project including con-espondence from the client, copies of the
chain-of-custody records, raw data, copies of entries from laboratory notebooks which pertain to
the project and a copy of the final report. When a project is complete, all records are passed to the
Document Custodian who inventories the file, checks for completeness, and puts the file into the
document archive, where it will be retained for a period of not less than 7 years.
Kubal-Furr & AssociaJes!Page 20
H~chst Ce/ane~ Corporation, Shelby, NC
Sampling and Analysis Plan/Rev. June 1996
-- - -- - -- - -- - -- --
Sampllng Matrix-Hoechst Celanes&-Shelby-Elfectlve 1st Q '9611
1at Ou1r1■r 2nd Quarter 3rd Ouartar
llonltoltflG 10C voe Elh,Qlyool 10C voe Eth.Glyool 10C voe Eth.Glyool 10C
Looailan (4Hi,1) ...fillli_ (GCIFID) (-415. i) (8280) (GCIFID) (-415. 1) (8260) (GC/FID) (415.1)
-Po/JJIS
IICI ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓
IIEF ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓
OTCI ✓ ✓
OllF ✓ ✓
SBRSludgo (FuUTCIJ')
FPSkJdgo (Fun TCLP)
_,,.,, w ...
C-.0 ✓ ✓
K-28 ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓
P-58 ✓ ✓
T-35 ✓ ✓
V-23 ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓
AA-54 ✓ ✓
= ✓ ✓
EE-58 ✓ ✓
FF-34 ✓ ✓
FF-62 ✓ ✓
GG~1 ✓ ✓
HH-48 ✓ ✓
HH-77 ✓ ✓
Olher11
PEW Wella-1/2/314 -Sampled during the 1st and 3rd Ouartera for analyala of VOCI by 8260A and SVOCe by 82708, lndudlng blphenyl and dlphenyl ether
Notes: 1 / All analyaN require Level II QA dellverablee with the excepllon of TCLP teeta which require Level Ill dellverablea
(See Sampllng & Ana.Jyall Plan, Attachment 3 br dNCrlptlon of Quallty Aaaurance OellverablO Levels)
2 I Samples collected and analyzed semiannually In reeponH to State-mandated requirement, not CEACLA-related
4-lh C-.;ar;.;;
voe
(8260)
✓
✓
- - -
Eth.Glyool
(GC/FID)
✓
✓
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
METH()D 8270B -Semi-Volatile Organics (TCLP List)
(Reportilng Limits should be at, or below, the levels indicated)
Paramem
Hexachlorobenzene
Hexachlorobutadiene
Hexachloroethane.
2-Methylphenol (o-Cresol)
3-Methylphenol (m-Cresol)
4-Methylphenol (p-Cresol)
2,4-Dini'trotoluene
Nitrobenzene
Pentachlorophenol
Pyridine
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
2 ,4,6-Trichlorophenol
Reporting L!rn!t fmg/L)
0,01
0,01
0,01
0,01
0,02
0 02
0,01
0,01
0,02
0,01
0,01
0,01
METHOD 8260A -Volatile Organics (TCLP List)
(Reporting Limits should be at, or below, the levels indicated)
earamem
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
Benzene,
2-Butancine(MEK)
Carbon tetrachloride
Chlorobe1nzene
Chloroform
1 ,2-Dichloroethane
1, 1-Dichloroethene
Tetrachlc,roethene
Trichloro(ethene
Vinyl chloride
Repon!og L!rnlt <mg/L)
0.10
0,10
0,10
0,10
0,10
0,10
0,10
0,10
0,10
0,10 o 20
CASI
118741
87683
67721
95487
108394
106445
121142
98953
87865
110861
95954
88062
CASI
106467
71432
78933
56235
108907
67663
107062
75354
127184
79016
75014
METHOCI 8080A -Organochlorlde Pesticides and PCBs (TCLP List)
(Reporting Limits should be at, or below, the levels indicated)
earamete.r
gamma-BHC (lindane)
Chlordam3
Endrin
Heptachlo,r
Heptachlor epoxide
Methoxychlor
Toxaphene
Reporting L!rnlt <mg/L)
0,003 o 03
0,003
0,003
0,003
0,01
0,25
CASI
58899
57749
72208
76448
1024573
72435
8001352
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
TOTAL METALS (TCLP List)
(Reporting Limits should be at, or below, the levels indicated)
Param,ew Jest Method Reporuna Umlt (mg/Ll CAS #
Arsenic 6010A 0,05 7440382
Barium 6010A 0,01 7440393
Cadmium 6010A 0,01 7440439
Chromium (total) 6010A 0.01 7440473
Lead 6010A 0.02 7439921
Mercury 7470A 0,001 7439976
Selenium 6010A 0,05 7782492
Silver 6010A 0.02 7440224
METHOD 81508 -Chlorinated Herbicides (TCLP List)
(Reporting Limits should be at, or below, the levels indicated)
ParamE1w Reporting Limit (mg/Ll CAS #
2,4-0 0.10 94757
2,4,5-TP (Silvex) 0,10 93721
I
I METHC>D 8015A (Modified) -Ethylene Glycol
(Reporting Limits should be at, or below, the levels indicated)
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
earamear
Ethylen,e Glycol
Reporting um1t <matu
10.0
METHCID 415.1 Total Organic Carbon
(Reporting Limits should be at, or below, the levels indicated)
earam,3ar
Total Organic Carbon
Report(ng um1t <matu
1.0
CAS #
107211
CAS #
NIA
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
METHO1D 8260A -Volatlle Organics (Target Analyte List)
(Reporting Limits should be at, or below, the levels indicated)
Acetone·
Benzent3
Bromodichloromethane
Bromomethane (Methyl bromide)
Bromoform
2-Butantlne(MEK)
Carbon disulfide
Carbon tetrachloride
Chlorobenzene
Chloroe,thane
Chlorofc,rm
Chloromethane (Methyl chloride)
Dibromc,chloromethane
1, 1-Dichloroethane
1 ,2-Dichloroethane
1, 1-Dichloroethene
cis-1 ,2-Dichloroethene
trans-1 .~!-Dichloroethene
1 ,2-Dichloropropane
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
trans-1.~l-Dichloropropene
Ethylbenzene
2-Hexanone
4-Methyi-2-petanone
Methylene chloride
Styrene
Tetrachl1lroethene
Toluene
Total Xylenes
1, 1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
1, 1, 1-Tri.chloroethane
1, 1,2-Triiehloroethane
Trichloroethene
Vinyl ace,tate
Vinyl cMoride
Reporting umn <mg/L}
0.050
0.005
0.005
0.010 o 005
0.010
0.020 o 005
0.005
0.010
0.005
0.010
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0 005
0.005
0.005 o 005
0.005
0.005 o 005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005 o 015
0.005
0.005
O 005
0.005
0.005
0.010
CA$#
67641
71432
75274
74839
75252
78933
75150
56235
108907
75003
67663
74873
124481
75343
107062
75354
156592
156605
78875
10061015
10061026
100414
591786
108101
75092
100425
127184
108883
1330207
79345
71556
79005
79016
108054
75014
I
I METHCID 82708 -Semi-Volatile Organics (PEW only)
I (Reporting Limits should be at, or below, the levels indicated)
BtlMUllog Limit (mgll,,) CAS ti. earamear
I Acenaphthene 0,013 83329
Acenaphthylene 0 013 208968
I Anthracene 0,013 120127
Benzoic: acid 0,130 65850
Benzo(a)anthracene 0,013 56553
I Benzo(b)fluoranthene 0,026 205992
Benzo (k)fluoranthene 0,026 207089
Benzo(sI,h,i)perylene 0,013 191242
I Benzo(a)pyrene 0,013 50328
Benzyl ;alcohol 0,013 100516
Bis(2-cr1loroethoxy) methane 0.013 111911
I Bis(2-clliloroethyl) ether 0,013 111444
Bis(2-cMoroisopropyl) ether 0,013 108601
Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate 0,013 117817
I 4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether 0,013 101553
Butyl benzyl phthalate 0,013 85687
4-Chlorc>aniline 0,013 106478 I 2-Chlornnaphthalene 0,013 91587
4-Chlom-3-methylphenol 0,013 59507
I 2-Chlornphenol 0 013 95578
4-Chlorc,phenyl phenyl ether 0,013 7005723
Chrysene 0,013 218019
I Dibenzo,(a,h)anthracene 0,013 53703
Dibenzo,furan 0,013 132649
Di-n-butylphthalate 0,013 84742
I 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 0,013 95501
1 ,3-Dictilorobenzene 0,013 541731
1 ,4-Dictilorobenzene 0.013 106467
I 3,3' -Dicl1lorobenzidine 0,013 91941
2,4-Dichlorophenol 0,013 120832
Diethyl phthalate 0,013 84662
I 2,4-Dim,athylphenol 0 013 105679
Dimethyl phthalate 0,013 131113
4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol 0,013 534521
I 2,4-Dinitrophenol 0,013 51285
2,4-Dintrotoluene 0,013 121142
2,6-Dinitrotoluene 0,013 606202
I · Di-n-octylphthalate 0,013 117840
Fluoranthene 0,013 206440
Fluoreno 0,013 86737
I
I
I
I METHC>D 82708 -Semi-Volatile Organics (PEW only)
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
(Reporting Limits should be at, or below, the levels indicated)
earamew
Hexachlorobenzene
Hexachlorobutadiene
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
Hexachloroethane
lndeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene
lsophoriJne
2-Methy·lnaphthalene
2-Methylphenol
4-Methylphenol
Naphthalene
2-Nitroaniline
3-Nitroaniline
4-Nitroaniline
Nitrobenzene
2-Nitrophenol
4-Nitrophenol
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine
N-Nitroso-di-n-propylamine
Pentachlorophenol
Phenanthrene
Phenol
Pyrene
1 ,2,4-Triiehlorobenzene
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
2 ,4,6-Trichlorophenol
Reporuna Llrntt <ma,u
o 013
0,013
0,013
0,013
0.013
0,013 o 013
0,013
0,026
0 013
0.013
0,013 o 013
0.013
0.013
0,013
0,013
0.013
0,013
0.013
0,013
0 013
0.013
0.013
0.013
I Additional 82708 Constituents (PEW only)
I
I
I
I
I
I
1 , 1 biphtmyl
Diphenyl ether
0,010
0,010
CAS #
118741
87683
77474
67721
193395
78591
91576
95487.
106445
91203
88744
99092
100016
98953
88755
100027
86306
621647
87865
85018
108952
129000
120821
95954
88062
92524
101848
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
11
Hoechst Celanese-Shelby, North Carolina
Laboratory Deliverables Inventory
Contents Level I Level II Level
III
Sampl,~ Results ✓ ✓ ✓
Method Conformance Summary ✓
Cbain(s) of Custody (COCs) ✓ ✓ ✓
Master Tracking Llst ✓ ✓
Case Narrative ✓
SampkPrep ✓
Standards Prep
Instrument Quality Control Data ✓
Batch Quality Control Report ✓
Smrogate Recovery Report ✓
Trip/Field/Equipment Blank Report ✓ ✓ ✓
Field Notes/Logbook ✓ ✓ ✓
CLPFonns
All Raw Data
Electmnic Deliverables ✓ ✓
Report Format
1. Title: Page
2. Table of Contents
3. Master Tracking Llst
4. Sample Results
5. Case Narrative/Instrument QC/Batch QC (by method)
6. Field Notes/Log
7. COCs
Definit:ions:
Sample Results
Level
IV
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
A quantitative representation of a measured parameter(s) based on the method specified on the
COCs. Repon layout to include date(s) analyzed, date(s) prepped (if applicable), parameter,
method., result, units, dilution and reporting/detection limit
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Method Confonnance Snmmm
A data sheet used to summarize compliance with method required quality control criteria Any out-
of-contml measurement for method required sample prep, instrument or batch quality control
criteria is documented with an associated assignable cause and qualification of data usability. (See
attached),
Chajn<sl of Custcxiy
Document used to track transfer(s) of sample custody. The information contained in this form
includes collection times and dates, sample preservation, number of containers, method(s) of
analysis, client information, project manager information, sample condition upon receipt,
laboratory number and storage.
MasrerTraclcini Llst
A table used to show the correlation between the sample's laboratory identification, client
identification, date collected, date received., date prepped(if applicable) and date analyzed.
CaseNa~
General information provided for each analytical method containing information such as how the
samples. were batched for processing and analysis, any data needing special attention or
qualification and any non-conformance to method criteria. Any non-conformances must be
accompimied by an assignable cause and affect on data usability.
Sample IEJ!.
Copy of sample prep log to verify sample batching frequency, sample aliquots, final
volumeii/weights, calculations, dilutions and any observations/comments noted during sample
prep.
Standan!s Prep
Copy of standards prep log to verify holding times, traceability, second source, calculations,
dilutions and any observations/comments noted during standards prep.
Instrument QuaUlY Control Data
Either raw data or summary sheets to verify analytical run sequence information, initial and
continuing calibration data, standard solution(s) requirements, correlation coefficient criteria,
tuning performance, interference checks, internal standards and linear range.
Batch OualilY Control Report
Summary of precision and accuracy measurements for the LCS/LFB, MS/MSD, Sample/Sample
Duplicate and Field Duplicates. The control limits should be provided if limits other than those
provided in the method were used. Additionally, the method blank information must be provided.
For Levd m and IV, duplicates must be performed for all methods for each matrix (water, soil and
TCLP) regardless of method criteria.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
S11m11rare Recoyezy Rt;port
Report summarizing the recoveries of smrogate compounds for all samples.
Trip/Fie!d/E.quipment Blank Rem:t
Report summarizing the data for all trip/field/equipment blanks. These results are reported in the
sample results section of the laboratory deliverable package.
Seid Notes/Logbook
Repon documenting compliance with all field collection activities. Any observations and or
sampling non-conformance are noted.
CLPF,rn
This requirement is for Level IV work only. These forms are specific to the CLP program for each
classifi,;ation of analysis and are to be filled out as per the appropriate SOW.
RawPillll
This requirement is for Level IV work only. The raw data consists of all internal/external COCs,
sample prep pages, standard(s) prep pages, run logs, all instrument raw data, laboratory notebook
pages and all quality control reports mention above.
Electronic Deliverables
Either a diskette or a file from a BBS containing all the hard copy information in a format
established by the end user of the data. Proactive coordination between the laboratory and the end
user should enable direct data transfer from the electronic deliverable to the database management
system.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
The table below represents the Level II Method Conformance Summary. All projects identified as
requiring Level II laboratory deliverables must be accompanied by this form filled out in full. Refer
to the definitions on the laboratory deliverables level summary document for clarification of criteria
definitions.
Method Conformance Summary
Criteria
Sampie Holding Trme
Standards Preparation
Instrument Tuning
Instrument Calibration
Calibr:ation Verification
Degradation Check
Interference Sample/Standard
Blanks Results
Metho:l Accuracy
Metho:l Precision
Surrogate Recovery
PDS/SD/MSA
TCLPPrep
Key: = Method Criteria Met = Not Applicable
Volatiles Semivolatil
es
= Method Criteria Not Met -see footnote(s)
PDS
SD
MSA
= Post Digestion Spike
= Serial Dilution
= Method of Standard Additions
Metals lnorganics
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Hoechst Celanese-Shelby, NC
Water Level Measurements
Date:-------------Page: of
Measmed by: ________ _ Measurement Device: ________ _
Monitor-Measuring Water
Ing Point Depth to Level Comments Elevatlon Water (ft) Elevatlon Location (ft, msl) (ft, msl)
A-39 823.36·
B-34 790.62
C-49 864.11
D-27 845.50
D-35 845.69
D-56 845.19
D-88 845.52
F-55 849.19
G-50 848.48
G-88 848.26
H-59 845.25
H-79 846.53
1-57 837.63
J-29 825.18
J-59 825.01
K-28 811.20
K-58 811.39
M-28 806.72
M-44 806.71
N-29 803.38
N-53 803.82
0-25 807.54
0-59 806.61
P-31 790.00
P-58 788.12
Kubal-Furr&: Associates
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Hoechst Celanese-Shelby, NC
Water Level Measurements
Date: ------------Page: of
Measured by: ________ _ Measurement Device: ________ _
Monitor-Measuring Water
Ing Point Depth to Level Comments Elevation Water (ft) Elevation· Location (ft, msl) (ft, msl)
Q-33 783.48
R-17 779.31
R-42 778.81
S-50 826.02
T-17 m.90
T-35 m.38
T-58 776.03
---U-38 826.55
V-23 811.89
W-23 800.91
X-32 796.96
Y-38 794.52
Y-74 794.87
Z-78 797.08
AA-41 783.68
AA-54 782.16
BB-18 771.75
CC-33 812.68
CC-6$ 811.37
DD-58 796.10
EE-58 794.48
FF-23 772.33
FF-34 772.73
FF~2 772.19
Kubal-Furr & Associates
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Hoechst Celanese-Shelby, NC
Water Level Measurements
Dare: ____________ _ Page: of 4
Measured by: ________ _ MeasurementDevice: ________ _
Monltc,r-Measuring Water
Ing Point Depth to Level Comments Elevation Water (ft) Elevation Locatic1n (ft, msl) (ft, msl)
GG-25 771.64
GG-39 770.44
GG~l 771.78
HH-48 755.44
HH-77 755.87
PZ-1 773.99
P'Z-2 795.81
PZ-3 786.62 (Well Desttoyed/Paved Over Between 8,95 and 11/95)
P'Z-4 750.07
P'Z-5A 788.72
PZ-5B m.59
PZ-6A 795.11
PU,13 796.89
P'Z-7A 780.46
PZ-7B 784.46
PZ-8 767.99
P'Z-9 788.96
P'Z-10 784.65
P'Z-11 805.48
P'Z-12 749.41
PZ-13 776.51
OT-IR 771.44
OT-2R 773.55
Of-3 792.88
Of-4 790.28
Kubal-Furr & Associates
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Date:
Hoechst Celanese-Shelby, NC
Water Level Measurements
Page: of 4
Measw-ed by: ________ _ Measurement Device: ________ _
Monlto1r-Measuring Water
Ing Point Depth to Level
Location Elevation Water (ft) Elevatl (ft, msl)
OT-5 784.00
OT.{; 787.45
OT.{;A -798.68
OT-7 782.16
OT-7A 782.52
OT-8 782.26
OT-10 804.08
IT-1 814.20
IT-2 813.85
IT-3 80').66
IT-4 80').08
IT-5 810.64
IT.{; 812.20
IT-7 813.52
IT-SR 813.04
IT-9 808.73
PEW-1 846.85
PEW-2 848.92
PEW-3 849.25
PEW-4 848.14
Kubal-Furr & Associates
-------------------Well Construction Details
Hoechst Celanese Corporation-Shelby, North Csrollna
Well Date Surface Casing Casing Total MPE Well Screen Well Screen Evacuation
Number Installed Elevation (ft Material size llnl Deoth (Ill /ft msl) Length (ft) Interval (ft msll Method
A-39 21-Sep-81 820.7 PVC 6.0 39.0 823.38 5 787.2 • 782.2 !P
B-34 22-Sep-81 787.6 PVC 2.0 35.0 790.82 5 758.1 • 753.1 IP
C-49 6-0ct-81 881.1 PVC 2.0 50.0 884.11 5 817.1 • 812.1 IP
D-27 3-Apr-86 842.7 ss 2.0 30.0 845.50 5 823.0 • 818.0 IP
....... D-35 ....... ..... 17-Nov-81 ..•.. 842.4 PVC ...•.... 2.0···-··· ....... 35.0 ...... ..... 845.69 .... 5 ..... 812.4 • 807.4 IP .......................... ........................... .. .......
D-56 8-Apr-86 843.1 ss 2.0 57.0 845.19 5 791.9 • 788.9 IP
D-88 15-Apr-86 843.6 ss 2.0 89.5 845.52 5 760.6 • 755.6 IP
F-55 12-Nov-81 846.2 PVC 2.0 55.0 849.19 5 796.2 • 791.2 IP
G-50 11-Nov-81 845.5 PVC 2.0 50.0 848.48 5 800.5 • 795.5 N
G-88 ..... J-Oct-81 .•. -. 845.5 PVC .... ...... 2.0 89.0 848.28 5 782.0: 757.0 ...... IP . ........ _ .................................
H-59 7-Feb-85 843.7 ss 2.0 60.5 845.25 5 789.7 • 784.7 N
H-79 6-0ct-81 843.0 PVC 2.0 80.0 848.53 5 768.5 • 763.5 N
1-57 30-Sep-81 834.4 PVC 2.0 60.0 837.63 5 781.9 -n8.9 N
J-28 9-Nov-81 821.7 PVC 2.0 29 825.18 5 798.2 • 793.2 N
-.~:.~.L_ 1-0cl-81 821.6 _ ---~c 2.0 60 8~~c<!.1 5 767.1-762.1 •. _ N
5-0ct-81 I••--•••--•-•-•----K-28 808.3 PVC 2.0 28 811.20 5 785.3 -780.3 BP
K-58 29-Sep-81 808.3 PVC 2.0 60 811.39 5 755.3 • 750.3 BP
M-28 10-Nov-81 804.2 PVC 2.0 28 808.72 5 781.2-n8.2 N
M-44 2-0ct-81 804.8 PVC 2.0 45 806.71 5 765.1 • 760.1 BP
N-29 11-Nov-81 800.9 PVC 2.0 ___ l!.9 803.38 5 778.9 -n1.9 BL
N-53 25-Sep-81 801.0 PVC 2.0 54 803.82 5 752.5 -747.5 ··--BP -·
0-25 12-Nov-81 804.5 PVC 2.0 25 807.54 5 784.5 • 779.5 BP
0-59 11-Feb-85 804.9 PVC 2.0 63.5 806.81 5 750.7 • 745.7 BP
P-31 25-Sep-81 788.5 PVC 2.0 32 790.00 5 760.0 • 755.0 N
P-58 .•.• 12-Apr-88 . 786.4 PVC 2.0 •.•.. 58.4 .•. _ 788.12 5 ... __ __732.9 • 727.9 BP
a-n9.8 ... -·· •--••oo••-•"''
Q-33 23-Sep-81 PVC 2.0 34 783.48 5 751.3 • 748.3 N
R-17 8-0cl-81 n6.5 PVC 2.0 17 779.31 5 784.5 • 759.5 N
R-42 29-Sep-81 n6.4 PVC 2.0 44 778.81 5 738.9 • 733.9 N
S-50 5-0ct-81 823.1 PVC 2.0 50 828.02 5 778.1 • 773.1 BP
T-17 1-0cl-81 n5.1 PVC .....•.. 2.0 17.5 7n.9o 5 783.1 ·_758.1 ...... BL .. .•.... ...... ........ ... . .......... . ....•...... BP············ T-35 14-Apr-86 n4.5 ss 2.0 37 m.38 5 743.8 • 738.8
T-58 24-Apr-86 774.5 ss 2.0 58.5 n6.03 5 721.0 • 718.0 BP
U-38 13-Feb-98 825.1 ss 2.0 53 828.55 5 738.4 • 731.4 BP
W-23 8-Feb-85 799.1 ss 2.0 24.4 800.91 5 780.9 • 775.9 N
X-32 8-Feb-85 794.9 ss 2.0 33.3 798.98 5 767.0 • 762.0 N
Y-38 11-Feb-85 792.9 ss 2.0 40.5 794.52 5 759.1 • 754.1 BL
-------------------Well Construction Detalls
Hoechst Celanese Corporation-Shelby, North Carolina
Well Date Surface Casing Casing Total MPE Well Screen Well Screen Evacuation
Number Installed Elevation Material size llnl Deoth /Ill 1ft msll Lencrth (ltl Interval (It msll Method
Y-74 10-Feb-85 793.2 ss 2.0 80.7 794.87 5 723.8 • 718.8 BP
Z-78 e-Feb-85 795.e ss 2.Q 79.3 797.08 C "'""' ,,, ., .. .,. "' .. ~ ,,,.,-,,,., ..
AA-41 10-Apr-86 762.0 ss 2.0 42 763.68 5 748.0 -741.0 BP
AA-54 9-Apr-88 781.7 ss 2.0 54.7 782.18 5 732.7 -727.7 BP
...... BB-18 _ 4-Allr-88 no.3 ss . 2.0 __ .... 18.5 771.75 .... 5 758.8 -751.8 N -----·--__ ,.
. ----··BP····-····· CC-33 4-Apr-86 810.7 ss 2.0 33 812.68 5 782.7 -1n.1
CC-64 12-Apr-88 810.6 ss 2.0 66.5 811.37 5 751.6 • 746.6 BP
DD-58 1-May-86 794.3 ss 2.0 59.4 796.10 5 741.3 • 736.3 BP
EE-58 14-Apr-86 792.5 ss 2.0 61 .9 794.48 5 739.5 -734.5 BP
FF-23 25-Apr-86 771.2 ss _ ·-2.0 __ . 25 .••. n2.33 .• 5 ·-752.6 • 747.6 BP •.•. FF-34 --------··· --BP······-24-Apr-86 no.1 ss 2.0 34.5 n2.13 5 741.7 • 736.7
FF-62 23-Apr-88 no.a ss 2.0 62.7 n2.19 5 713.2 -708.2 BP
GG-25 25-Apr-86 769.2 ss 2.0 26.5 n1.64 5 748.9 • 743.9 BP
GG-39 25-Apr-86 769.2 ss 2.0 39.5 no.44 5 735.2 • 730.2 BP
GG-61 30-Anr-86 769.4 ss 2.0 ·-·····61 .. _ .. _n1 .. 18 .. 5 713.4 • 708.4 BP -·--·---·-··-······---· .. -......
HH-48 2-May-86 753.8 ss 2.0 48 755.44 5 710.8 -705.8 BP
HH-n 30-Aor-88 753.3 ss 2.0 77.9 755.87 5 680.9 -875.9 BP
PZ-1 25-0ct-88 n4.14 PVC 1.0 62.5 n3.99 20 734.14 -714.14 N
PZ-2 25-0ct-88 795.91 PVC 1.0 62.5 795.81 20 755.91 -735.91 N
PZ-3 10-Nov-88 788.75 PVC 1.0 62.5 788.82 20 746.75 -726.75 (See note 1)
PZ-4 11-Nov-88 750.13 PVC 1.0 62.5 750.07 20 710.15-690.15 N
PZ-5A 22-Anr-89 788.74 PVC 1.0_ .... 64 788.72 __ !0 734.74: 724.74 N .... --PZ-5B 22-Apr-89 m.61 PVC 1.0 65 m.59 10 722.61 -712.61 N
PZ-6A 18-Apr-89 795.13 PVC 1.0 65 795.11 10 740.13 -730.13 N
PZ-6B 17-Apr-89 796.91 PVC 1.0 62 796.89 10 744.91 · 734.91 N
PZ-7A 19-Apr-89 780.46 PVC 1.0 62 780.48 10 728.48 • 718.48 N
PZ-7B 18-Allr-69 764.48 .•. PVC 1.0 -·--65 ···--.... 764.46 10 729.48 -719.48 N -··pz-e -·· ..
26.Jun-90 765.69 PVC 1.0 67.5 767.99 10 710.69 -700.69 N
PZ-9 26.Jun-90 788.61 PVC 1.0 68 788.96 10 733.61 -723.61 N
PZ-10 26.Jun-90 782.65 PVC 1.0 68 764.65 10 726.65 -716.65 N
PZ-11 26.Jun-90 803.38 PVC 1.0 68 805.48 10 748.38 • 738.38 N
PZ-12 28.Jun-90 747.31 PVC 1.0 68 749.41 10 692.31 • 682.31 N
PZ-13 28.Jun-90 773.61 PVC 1.0 35 776.51 10 751.61 -741.61 N
-------------------Well Construction Details
Hoechst Celanese Corporation-Shelby, North Csrollna
Well Date Surface Casing Casing Total MPE Well Screen
Number Installed Elevation Mate~al size llnl Deoth (Ill (ft msll Lenoth (ft\
OT-1 28-0ct-88 771.36 cs 6.0 67 774.36 10
OT-1R 28-J:.m-95 . PVC 6.0 71.5 771.44 32
OT-2 27-0ct-68 773.01 cs 6.0 65 774.01 20
OT-2R 30-Apr-96 . PVC 6.0 67 773.55 30
OT-3 27-0ct-88 790.88 cs 6.0 68 792.88 20
OT-4 26-0ct-88 788.28 cs 6.0 65 790.28 20 .. OT-5 18-Feb-88 782.15 cs 4.0 66 784.00 20
OT-6 26-0ct-68 783.45 cs 6.0 66 787.45 20
OT-SA 30.Jun-90 796.68 cs 6.0 84 798.68 10
OT-7 28-0ct-88 780.16 cs 6.0 68 782.16 20
OT-7A ..•. 26.Jun-90 __ __ 780.52 .•. cs 6.0 64 782.52 ·-20
OT-8 26-0ct-68 779.26 cs 6.0 67 782.26 20
OT-10 30.Jun-95 . PVC 6.0 98 804.08 42
IT-1 29-0ct-88 814.20 ss 2.0 42.5 814.20 10
IT-2 29-0ct-88 813.85 ss 2.0 42.5 813.85 10
IT-3 29-0ct-88 809.66 ss 2.0 42.5 809.66 10
IT-4 29-0ct-88 809.08 ss 2.0 42.5 809.08 10
IT-5 29-0cl-88 ___ 810.64 •.. ss 2.0 42.5 810.64 10 --IT-6 29-0ct-68 812.20 ss 2.0 42.5 812.20 10
IT-7 29-0ct-88 813.52 ss 2.0 42.5 813.52 10
IT-8 29-0cl-88 815.16 ss 2.0 42.5 815.16 10
IT-BR 21.Jul-95 -PVC 4.0 44.2 813.04 20.00
IT-9 29-0cl-88 808.73 ss 2.0 42.5 808.73 10
PEW-1 16-Aug-93 845.15 ss 6.0 92 846.85 31.3
PEW-2 23-Aug-93 847.22 ss 6.0 98 848.92 · 31.3
PEW-3 17-Aug-93 847.55 ss 6.0 100.5 849.25 31.3
PEW-4 17-Auo-93 846.44 ss 6.0 94 848.14 31.3
Note (1) PZ-3 was destroyed/covered by pavement between August 1995 and November 1995
(2) OT-1 was abandoned In accordance wtth North Carolina Regs on 6/29/95
(3) OT-2 was abandoned In accordance with North Carolina Regs on 5/21/96
(4) IT-8 was abandoned In accordance with North Carolina Regs on 7121/95
SS • stainless steel/ PVC • polyvlnyl chloride/ CS • carbon steel
Well Screen Evacuation
lnteival (ft msll Method
724.36 • 704.36 (See note 2)
731.44 • 699.44 S/CP/CH
728.01 • 708.01 (See note 3)
736.55 • 706.55 S/CP/CH
742.88 • 722.88 S/CP/CH
. 743.28 • 723.28 S/CP/CH . .. . ..
738.65 • 718.65 S/CP/CH
737.45 • 717.45 S/CP/CH
722.68 • 712.68 S/CP/CH
732.16 • 712.16 S/CP/CH
737.52 • 717.52 --~CP/CH
732.26 • 712.26 S/CP/CH
745.58 • 703.58 N
784.20 • 774.20 BP/CH
783.85 • 773.85 BP/CH
779.68 • 769.66 BP/CH
779.08 • 769.08 BP/CH
780.64 • 770.64 BP/CH
782.20 • 772.20 BP/CH
783.52 • 773.52 BP/CH
785.16-775.16 (See note 4)
793.34 • 773.34 PN/CH
778.73 • 768.73 BP/CH
753.85 • 722.55 s
750.42-719.12 s
752.55 • 720.75 s
753.14 • 721.84 s
BP • bladder pump/ N a not sampled/ BL • baller/ S • submersible / CH • common header/ CP • continuous pump
P = pneumatic