NCD003446721_19900601_Celeanse Corporation - Shelby Fiber_FRBCERCLA RA_Quarterly Status Report OU-1 Remedial Action Vol. 1 of 2 Feb - May 1990-OCR

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Westinghoose Environmental
and Gootectmical Services. Inc.
5050H185
•
3980 Dekalb Technology Parkway
Suite 700
Atlanta, Georgia 30340
[phone]
Fax [phone]
QUARTERLY STATUS REPORT
OPERABLE UNIT 1 REMEDIAL ACTION
WESTINGHOUSE PROJECT 4124-85-0S0H
DOCUMENT CONTROL SS0S0H-0235
VOLUME 1 OF 2
Prepared For:
HOECHST CELANESE CORPORATION
Shelby, North Carolina
Prepared By:
WESTINGHOUSE ENVIRONMENTAL AND
GEOTECHNICAL SERVICES, INC.
Atlanta, Georgia
May 1990
Everett w. Glover, Jr. ,P-: E.
Project Manager
A Westinghouse Electric Corporation subsidiary.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Operable Unit 1 Quarterly Status Report
February 1990 to May 1990
Hoechst Celanese/Shelby, NC
Westinghouse Project 4124-B5-050H
Document Control B5050H-0235
Page i
List of Figures
List of Tables
List of Plates
List of Appendices
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
l.0 INTRODUCTION
1.1 Site Description
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.2 Site History and Regulatory Status
1.3 Description of Operable Unit 1 Facilities
1.3.1 Inner Tier Treatment System
1.3.2 Outer Tier Treatment System
2.0 INNER TIER TREATMENT SYSTEM
2.1 Influent Water Quality
2.2 Inner Tier Treatment Processes
2.3 Contract Laboratory Program (CLP) Data
2.3.1 Influent/Effluent Data
2.3.2 Sludge Dewatering -Metal Treatment
J.0 OUTER TIER TREATMENT SYSTEM
3.1 Influent Water Quality
3.2 outer Tier Treatment Processes
3.3 Contract Laboratory Program (CLP) Influent/
Effluent Data
4.0 PUMPING SYSTEM OPERATION AND HYDROLOGIC EFFECTS
OF PUMPING
4.1 Inner Tier System
4. 1. 1 Flow Data
4.1.2 Groundwater Elevations
5050H185
Page
iii
iv
V
vi
ES-1
1-1
1-1
1-3
1-7
1-12
1-14
2-1
2-1
2-1
2-10
2-10
2-13
3-1
3-1
3-1
3-2
4-1
4-2
4-2
4-3
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
s.o
6.0
7.0
4.2
Operable Unit 1 Quarterly Status Report
February 1990 to May 1990
Hoechst Celanese/Shelby, NC
Westinghouse Project 4124-85-050H
Document Control 85050H-0235
Page ii
Outer Tier System 4-5
4.2.1 Flow Data 4-5
4.2.2 Groundwater Elevations 4-6
GROUNDWATER QUALITY 5-l
5.1 On-Site Groundwater Quality 5-5
5. 1. 1 Background Groundwater Area 5-5
5. 1.2 Inner Tier Area 5-5
5 .1. 3 Outer Tier Area 5-7
5.2 Off-site Groundwater Quality 5-9
QUALITY ASSURANCE/QUALITY CONTROL 6-1
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 7-1
5050H185
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Figure
1-1
1-2
1-3
1-4
2-1
2-2
5050H185
Operable Unit 1 Quarterly Status Report
February 1990 to May 1990
Hoechst Celanese/Shelby, NC
Westinghouse Project 4124-85-050H
Document Control 85050H-0235
Page iii
List or Figures
Title ~
Site Location Map 1-2
Well Location Map-Operable Unit 1 Facilities 1-8
Groundwater Treatment system Schematic 1-10
Flow Diagram
Process and Instrumentation Diagram 1-11
Operable Unit 1 Facilities
Inner Tier Influent vs SBR Effluent Daily 2-6
COD
Inner Tier Influent vs SBR Effluent Rolling 2-7
Weekly Average COD
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Table
2-1
2-2
2-3
5-1
5-2
5-3
5050H185
Operable Unit 1 Quarterly Status Report
February 1990 to May 1990
Hoechst Celanese/Shelby, NC
Westinghouse Project 4124-85-050H
Document Control 85050H-0235
Page iv
List ot Tables
Title
Influent and SBR Effluent COD Data
compounds/Analytes
Effluent Samples:
Extraction Tiers
Detected in Influent/
Inner and Outer
Compounds Detected in Sludge samples
Compounds/Analytes Detected in Inner Tier
Monitor Wells
Compounds/Analytes Detected in Outer Tier
Monitor Wells
2-5
2-11
2-15
5-2
5-3
Compounds/Analytes Detected in Off-Site Wells 5-4
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Plate
1
2
3
4
5
5050H185
Operable Unit 1 Quarterly status Report
February 1990 to May 1990
Hoechst Celanese/Shelby, NC
Westinghouse Project 4124-85-050H
Document Control 85050H-0235
Page v
List of Plates
Title
Pre-extraction Groundwater Elevations
July 25, 1989
Interpreted Groundwater Elevations
February 5, 1990
Interpreted Groundwater Elevations
March 1, 1990
Interpreted Groundwater Elevations
April 3, 1990
Interpreted Groundwater Elevations
May 3, 1990
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Appendix
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
5050H185
Operable Unit 1 Quarterly Status Report
February 1990 to May 1990
Hoechst Celanese/Shelby, NC
Westinghouse Project 4124-85-050H
Document Control 85050H-0235
Page vi
List of Appendices
Title
Inner Tier
Influent/Effluent Water Quality Data, Summary
Plots, IEA Data, Inner Tier Extraction Well Data
Davis & Floyd, Inc. Data
Inner Tier
Influent/Effluent CLP Water Quality Data
SBR/Filter Press Sludge Analyses
Outer Tier
Influent/Effluent Water Quality
Outer Tier
Influent/Effluent CLP Water Quality
Inner and Outer Tier
Water Level, Flow, and Rainfall Data
CLP Groundwater Data
Monitor and Residential Wells
QA/QC Data
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Operable Unit 1 Quarterly Status Report
February 1990 to May 1990
Hoechst Celanese/Shelby, NC
Westinghouse Project 4124-85-0SOH
Document Control 85050H-0235
Page ES-1
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Hoechst Celanese is conducting remedial actions to address
groundwater contamination at the Shelby, North Carolina site.
Source remediation is being addressed under a second Operable
Unit.
From the third quarter of analytical and flow data, the
following information was observed:
o The inner tier extraction system continued to
experience problems during the third quarter. Flow
meters gave occasional spurious readings due to air
being introduced into the lines, generating "false"
flow meter activation. The inner tier pumps and
control.lers generally worked well throughout the
quarter, with the exception of IT-1, IT-4, and IT-8.
0
0
0
5050H185
From February 1990 through April 1990, the inner and
outer tier wells have pumped approximately 240,000 and
6,700,000 gallons, respectively. The inner tier
quantity is overestimated because of problems with flow
meters.
Pumping in the inner and outer tier wells produced
little or no drawdown in most on-site wells. The water
level in all wells rose from February 5 to March l. A
slow drop in water level occurred throughout the rest
of the quarter. These trends are attributable to
variations in rainfall.
Well drawdown data continued to indicate the need for
two additional extraction wells and six piezometers as
proposed in the first and second quarterly reports.
Approval of these recommendations has been granted by
the EPA.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
0
0
5050H185
Operable Unit 1 Quarterly Status Report
February 1990 to May 1990
Hoechst Celanese/Shelby, NC
Westinghouse Project 4124-85-050H
Document Control 85050H-0235
Page ES-2
Analytical data indicates that the treatment system is
performing fairly well. However, problems with the SBR
unit have continued into this quarter. The SBR unit
experienced a biomass kill in early February,
experienced a biomass upset in late March, and slight
problems continued into April.
The results of third round sampling of potable supply
wells showed little evidence of contamination.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1.1 site Description
Operable Unit 1 Quarterly Status Report
February 1990 to May 1990
Hoechst Celanese/Shelby, NC
Westinghouse Project 4124-85-0S0H
Document Control 85050H-0235
Page 1-1
1.0 INTRODUCTION
The Hoechst Celanese site is a 469-acre property occupied by a
polyester resin and fiber production facility (Figure 1-1). The
site is located in south-central Cleveland County east of North
Carolina Highway 198. It is approximately 1 mile north of
Earl, North Carolina and 6 miles south of Shelby. The nearest
major city is Charlotte, North Carolina, 35 miles east of
Shelby.
The plant facilities consist of the plant production area,
wastewater treatment area, former waste disposal areas, former
sludge landfarm area, and recreation and wooded areas. The
majority of the land surface reflects cultural modification by
construction, and by cutting and filling. The original soil
profile has probably been either truncated or covered across
much of the site, and was never conclusively identified as
undisturbed during the field investigations of the Remedial
Investigation (RI). The plant production area is predominantly
covered with buildings and paved or gravelled areas. However,
to the east, toward the wastewater treatment area, the site
5050H185
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~ Westinghouse Environmental
~ and Geo technical Services, Inc.
. ---
840---:::.,,-~ -:.-_ , , .
FIGURE 1-1
SITE LOCATION MAP
HC/SHELBY
!
1000 ""
SULE lll FEET
WESTINGHOUSE PROJECT 4124-85-0SOH
""
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
operable Unit 1 Quarterly Status Report
February 1990 to May 1990
Hoechst Celanese/Shelby, NC
Westinghouse Project 4124-85-0SOH
Document Control 85050H-0235
Page 1-3
becomes more open, with the majority of the land covered by
impoundments, with grass and access roads in between. The
former sludge landfarm is north of the plant production area and
is overgrown with coarse grasses. The recreation area and
wooded area to the south have no facilities related to the plant
process.
Adjacent land use is rural. Some residences are located within
1 mile of the site.
1.2 Site History and Regulatory Status
Fiber Industries, Inc., a joint venture of Celanese Corporation
and Imperial Chemicals, Incorporated (ICI), was the original
owner of the plant and operated it from 1960 until 1983 when the
Celanese Corporation bought out ICI's share of the facility.
American Hoechst and Celanese merged in 1987 to form Hoechst
Celanese. rt is now operated as the Hoechst Celanese, Shelby
Facility. Operations at the Shelby facility began in April,
1960. Manufacturing operations included the production of
polyester polymer resin and filament yarn. The principal
chemicals involved in polymer production are dimethyl
terephthalate and ethylene glycol.
5050H185
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Operable Unit 1 Quarterly status Report
February 1990 to May 1990
Hoechst Celanese/Shelby, NC
Westinghouse Project 4124-85-050H
Document Control 85050H-0235
Page 1-4
The Hoechst Celanese wastewater treatment plant was constructed
in phases concurrent with the manufacturing plant, and became
fully operational in the mid-1960's. In 1973, the wastewater
treatment plant was expanded with the addition of a polishing
pond, two emergency spill ponds, and an additional aeration
basin. The treated effluent from the wastewater treatment plant
is piped to a discharge point on Buffalo Creek.
Several areas around the plant have been used for waste
disposal. Normal plant wastes (primarily polyester and
miscellaneous trash) were disposed of in old burning pits
located just north of the aeration basins. North and east of
the burning pits, glycol t'ecovery unit (GRU) sludge was buried
in trenches during the early 1960's.
Two other areas of buried waste are located to the north of the
main plant. The polymer and fiber landfill contains primarily
non-hazardous inert materials such as excavation spoil,
construction waste, and yarn. The construction debris landfill
contains items such as old cinder blocks and steel strapping
bands.
Investigation of the Hoechst Celanese site began in October 1981
when Hoechst Celanese contracted with Westinghouse to install 23
5050H185
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
operable Unit 1 Quarterly Status Report
February 1990 to May 1990
Hoechst Celanese/Shelby, NC
Westinghouse Project 4124-85-0SOH
Document Control 85050H-0235
Page 1-5
groundwater monitor wells. In conjunction with the groundwater
monitor well installation program, Westinghouse also conducted a
hydrogeologic evaluation. Subsequently, Hoechst Celanese
initiated a groundwater sampling and analysis program under the
supervision of Davis & Floyd Laboratories, Inc.
In June 1986, the Hoechst Celanese, Shelby Facility was placed
on EPA's National Priorities List (NPL). On March 10,1986,
Hoechst Celanese signed a final Order on Consent to prepare a
RI/FS.
The RI report for the site was finalized in July 1987. The
identified areas needing remediation were the former glycol
recovery unit waste pits, other adjacent disposal pits and
stream sediments, and groundwater contaminated by the waste in
those pits. Due to the groundwater contamination and the
potential for it to move off-site, EPA approved a proposal for a
two-phased clean-up action. These two phases are identified as
Operable Unit 1 (OU 1), which focused on remediating
contaminated groundwater, and Operable Unit 2 (OU 2), which
addressed remediation of the sludges and soils associated with
the former glycol recovery unit trenches, the burn pit areas,
and stream sediments.
5050H185
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Operable Unit 1 Quarterly Status Report
February 1990 to May 1990
Hoechst Celanese/Shelby, NC
Westinghouse Project 4124-85-050H
Document Control 85050H-0235
Page 1-6
The Operable Unit 1 FS for the groundwater was completed in
February 1988. The Record of Decision (ROD) for OU 1 Remedial
Action was signed March 23, 1988, and required extraction and
treatment of contaminated groundwater associated with the site.
Hoechst Celanese agreed to conduct the Remedial Action for OU 1
in a partial Consent Decree dated June 30, 1988. Construction
of the extraction and treatment systems was completed in August
1989, and they are presently operational.
The FS for OU 2 Remedial Action was final in February 1989.
This remedial action will address contaminant source control at
the site. The Consent Decree on OU 2 was signed by Hoechst
Celanese on June 19, 1989.
Operable Unit 2 remediation activities include the following:
0
0
0
0
5050H185
excavation of approximately 2000 cubic yards of glycol
recovery unit (GRU) sludges. The 2000 cubic yards
includes a known GRU volume of 1500 cubic yards plus an
additional 1 foot of soil below the GRU/soil interface
excavation of approximately 1200 cubic yards of burn
pit residuals
excavation of approximately 600 cubic yards of plastic
chip
excavation of approximately 110 cubic yards of stream
sediments
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
0
0
0
0
Operable Unit l Quarterly Status Report
February 1990 to May 1990
Hoechst Celanese/Shelby, NC
Westinghouse Project 4124-85-0SOH
Document Control 85050H-0235
Page 1-7
incineration of GRU sludges and associated soils
chemical fixation (solidification) of incinerator ash,
plastic chip, burn pit residuals, and stream sediments
on-site disposal of solidified materials
regrading and revegetating, where necessary
o monitoring
The anticipated timing for beginning Operable Unit 2 remedial
activities is third quarter (November) 1990; completion of site
excavation, incineration and soldification of residuals will
extend into the third quarter (August) 1991.
1.3 Description of Operable Unit 1 Facilities
Groundwater is being extracted from a relatively uncontaminated
"outer tier" of wells located near the southern and eastern
plant boundaries and from a heavily contaminated ''inner tier" of
wells located adjacent to, and hydraulically downgradient from,
the source areas west of the wastewater polishing ponds. The
general location of the OU l facilities are shown on Figure 1-2.
The inner tier of extraction wells is being operated at a rate
to yield a specific daily volume for treatment, and the outer
tier is being pumped at a rate necessary to produce overlapping
cones of influence. This pumping plan was developed to:
5050H185
I
i
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
NO. ATE REVISIONS
DD-SB
0
BY WESTINGHOUSE PROJECT 4124-85-0SOH
DESIGNED BY
DRAWN BY
CHECKED BY
FILE NO. 5050N02
DATE
Westinghouse Environmental
and Geotechnical Services, Inc.
Hoechst Celanese
Shelby, N.C.
Corporation
0
A
cg:]
INNER / OUTER TIER EXTRACTION WELLS
EXISTING MONITOR WELLS
EXISTING PIEZOMETERS
GROUNDWATER TREATMENT
SYSTEM LOCATION
0 200 400 ----SCl,LE JN FEET
FIGURE 1-2
WELL LOCATION MAP-OPERABLE
UNIT 1 FACILITIES
HC/SHELBY
800
WESTINGHOUSE PROJECT 4124-85-0SOH
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Operable Unit 1 Quarterly Status Report
February 1990 to May 1990
Hoechst Celanese/Shelby, NC
Westinghouse Project 4124-85-050H
Document Control 85050H-0235
Page 1-9
1) collect the more highly contaminated groundwater as close to
the source as possible, and 2) to have the minimal effect on
nearby drinking water wells from operation of the outer tier
wells.
The outer tier extraction and treatment system consists of eight
extraction wells, an equalization tank, an air stripping tower,
and a granulated activated carbon (GAC) adsorption system. The
inner tier extraction and treatment system consists of nine
extraction wells, an equalization tank, a metals treatment
process, a sequencing batch reactor (SBR) with associated manual
nutrient and chemical feeds and sludge handling equipment, an
air stripping tower, and a GAC adsorption system. The treatment
systems are enclosed in a metal building and installed on a
common concrete pad located between the polishing ponds of the
existing plant wastewater treatment system. The groundwater
treatment area has provisions for spill containment and control
using curbing and a collection sump. The treatment system
schematic flow diagram is shown in Figure 1-3, and the process
and instrumentation diagram (P&ID) is shown on Figure 1-4.
5050H185
-- - - -
IUC~WASH/Sl!fl SLl.Oc.E
TO OIQE.STUI
-
IHt-1::R TIUI EHLUUtT
TO #1 Pa...lSI-IIHO l'OfJ
-
01.JTEA t !EA EFFLUENT
ftl _, P{LISHIMO l'OMl I~ TIEii 11-FLLEJ.IT
- - - -- -- -
J~----------------------------<--------------,
~
W~ TIEii lNfLUUH
"" STRIPf'EJI
SECL£HCIMO e•TCH ffE.ACftJA
Q)( FROM TOP OF SBR l
I
I r
I
I
I
I
- --- - - - --< - - - - - - - - - - - - - -_I
EIIJALIUTICl'i , ... """'" CQ.llCTJQol , ....
-- -
LEGEND
SAMPLING LOCATIONS NOT TO SCALE
WESTINGHOUSE PROJECT DATE
DESIGNED BY
DRAWN BY
OiECKED BY
Fll...E NAME so,oN06
Westinghouse Environmental
and Geotechnical Services, Inc.
FIGURE 1-3
GROUNDWATER TREATMENT SYSTEM
SCHEMATIC FLOW DIAGRAM
HC/SHELBY
WESTINGHOUSE PROJECT 4124-85-O5OH
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I NO. IOATEi
I
.._
• --at=-1 _,.,_."'-'lf'Wl
na:••·••m-,
t
! • f ,t
.....
.•. .. ·-• ..... .. :.,
• ....
' --' .. : fan '''elf' ' ' ' ' ' ~:r~I::·----~-.i , ~--~ e;. ~.J, /~ ~@•-@-: ~~: ___ ::. ::::i .:. ,,:.
: iili ' ' • • • • -
r----------.
' . ' ' I , l,nnt~~
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ~. :-~
I I
I I I I--
I ~
! 00
;::
L --~.;-~ __ ,.
L....,.I ,..,
' I
,· ....... .
~' :-r..----..---------,r-,......; ... ._,, ,. '"Of..._.. ---I o-. •--n•n , lll2ll:S
:
.J..
-..... ~ .......... ......,,9WJ..-.... 1• ._, tlD _._,_ -.'-D-1 m'II AT -.._ .,___ •-..,,. ____ c., ..... ,.-.......... _ •• "-f ........ --i. IZlll.--...111_._ __ ._...__v,~._.,._ .-.-.-.. •--•-•--a
•.u -... -·---_,. -aaa.,,c, .... -·-~UC... 10 .. 11 ..
wxa.-• ...... 'l (-NI -..... Pih.,._.._ ... UM..._. -.. ---~·••1-'--1..-r. .... .-..lU,,IC.("" ... --.. LrC!. a-acLJI ., ,_ ..... _ -u..... ... at 1--· con.,....,._~..,_ --1.1l•lililm 1 .. 1 IT.,. ......
UI'•-CL«-t ... ......,..,. Nff an -~ --= ----., ., .... -...... ------
f. ~__,al '-_.., -...__, a, ---••:o;: --. ..... -........... .._._---..,., """..,..,..,...,, ........ ..., ...... '!!-~~ ... : =~ = ,:...,-=:.a'.:::.t =--~« fl'l'C=:.r.,:s,_,..:::::.r: .. ~:.--..-. .................. ..., _ _.., --------.......... , ._ __ ,.. _____ fll&oa-
0--...."--111--------•---,.., gr :o::,~---cu........a,_. .... ....._
:t--:ft.f"' .. ~--·-Q..___ m.!:' ........
I
I
' ' ~-------------------
:: :.:a.::== ... ~=::=-_,. ..... ,., .. --u--r. ~==,==--' ' ' ---------' ,...._
.... ..,
r ■rm
INNER TIER JEU, :SXSIRC
~ " I ----l•----
0
'
.... ,.:;:.,,..,
ta .... ,.. .... ,
.... ....
......
REVlSJONS
----------------------------
I BY WESTINGHOUSE PROJECT I DATE
DES1CNED BY
DRAWN B'T'
CHECKED BY
F'ILE NO. 49U5ZOO
fr, -----.. ;
!....r--•-
-' . -a,
' :... r;;: 'J '{ •. -T•C•!OOO
T-••101•
r ... , ...
........
~ II• (• ~ ~ ·••!J) ' .. .._
' : ·t~
... ..
l •• "
r-•
,,..._
-, ........
,----.. lt'CL ... --Q-1~ 1&-a, ..... ... c..aa..._,,. 1&111. ., .. ..... ~,. ... .,_ CM-C:a..ollla.d ___ .._. ______ ,.,.....;
... 111,l ,...., -. .. --.,.. ... ~ ............. . ------~ 11. ,... ............... ..........
1a. ... ~ ............. ..........
,-1,. ___ ,._,___ _ _.,...,,NC~~ ...... " .............. , .. _______ ,_.,.. ____ -.-..e.._,.,_,
■IUCl>V•------
r-.......
-----,
-CD6_ ......... __ ,----~-•-1 ~~-----a
~----· .,._ • -..,.116SL" -a --:. ----c ~-----------...... , ....... , ---· " --· ! --· -_,..,
D ..-.-.-S.IC'a----..-.i
~ ~..,_. ___ ,
--·-a ----.,..,...._. .... ----0 --
1,1 wnDn• --· ,, ~ -·· i8·
----.. ----.
Westinahouse Environmental
and Geotecnnical Services, inc.
REFERENCE HOECHST CELANESE DRAWING
Y-10-11501 i'IEV.4 10/26/eg
''---, .... ,., .......... ,..,.. .,, ·--•1. -..ca~--. .... , ......... -~
'I "'-t h"1CNI .-rr.., ............ ...,DJ .,:W"I.
FIGURE 1-4
PROCESS AND INSTRUMENTATION DIAGRAM
OPERABLE UNIT F ACILIT::C:S
HC/SHELBY
WESTINGHOUSE PROJECT 4124·85-0SOH
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Operable Unit l Quarterly Status Report
February 1990 to May 1990
Hoechst Celanese/Shelby, NC
Westinghouse Project 4124-85-050H
Document Control 85050H-0235
Page 1-12
1.3.1 Inner Tier Treatment system
Neutralization/Equalization
The equalization and neutralization tank allows the wastewater
to be treated on a batch basis. Neutralization of the influent
is needed because the optimum pH for biological treatment is
between pH 6.5 and 7.5., and is accomplished by the raising the
pH of the influent using sodium hydroxide (caustic). A pH
control system measures the pH of the solution and adjusts the
addition of caustic on a demand basis to maintain the effluent
within acceptable pH limits.
Solids/Metals Precipitation
Iron removal is needed prior to biological treatment. After the
pH of the influent is raised to about 7.5, a small amount of a
chemical polymer is added to coagulate the metal particles into
larger, heavier floe particles, which then separate from the
water. A parallel-plate separator is used to remove the
coagulated floe particles, and the clear liquid overflows a weir
and enters the biological treatment unit. The precipitated iron
sludge is collected in drums for disposal at an off-site
facility.
5050H185
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Operable Unit 1 Quarterly Status Report
February 1990 to May 1990
Hoechst Celanese/Shelby, NC
Westinghouse Project 4124-85-0SOH
Document Control 85050H-0235
Page 1-13
Sequencing Batch Reactor
The sequencing batch reactor (SBR) treatment is a biological
wastewater treatment tank which operates in a sequence of
cycles. The SBR cycle consists of fill, treatment, settle,
decant, and idle stages. At the beginning of the cycle,
nutrients are added as needed. Aeration continues throughout
the fill cycles and until the subsequent settling cycle. one
complete cycle occurs each day.
Based on the influent data, ammonia and phosphorous addition are
needed in the SBR. Typically, the ratio in a wastewater
treatment is 100 to 5 to 1 for BOD, ammonia-nitrogen, and
phosphorous, respectively. Nutrients are added manually to
approximately maintain these ratios.
Air stripper system
The air stripper system receives water from the decant
collection tank using a transfer pump. The air stripper system
consists of the air stripping tower, sump, and the effluent
pump. The equipment is operated in an automatic mode, and is
designed to start automatically on a high liquid level in the
decant collection tank. When the air stripping tower sump fills
5050H185
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Operable Unit 1 Quarterly Status Report
February 1990 to May 1990
Hoechst Celanese/Shelby, NC
Westinghouse Project 4124-85-0SOH
Document control 85050H-0235
Page 1-14
to a preset level, the effluent pump activates and pumps the
water through the activated carbon filter.
carbon Filtration
The treated water is pumped through the carbon filter(s) by the
air stripper sump pump. The carbon filter(s) are valved such
that any one or all of the filters may be used. Currently, only
one of the carbon filters is used for the inner tier. After
flowing through the carbon filters, the effluent is discharged
into the first polishing pond prior to being discharged through
the plant's NPDES outfall.
1.3.2 outer Tier Treatment system
Equalization
The equalization tank is used to collect the pumped groundwater
prior to treatment to provide more uniform influent for plant
operation and process control.
Air stripper system
The air stripper receives water from the equalization tank using
a transfer pump. The air stripper system consists of the air
SOSOH185
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Operable Unit 1 Quarterly Status Report
February 1990 to May 1990
Hoechst Celanese/Shelby, NC
Westinghouse Project 4124-85-0S0H
Document Control SS0S0H-0235
Page 1-15
stripper tower, sump, and the effluent pump. The equipment
operates in an automatic mode to pump liquid from the
equalization tank to the top of the air stripper tower. When
the air stripper tower sump is filled to a preset level, the air
stripper effluent pump activates and pumps the water to the
activated carbon filter.
carbon Filtration
The air stripper water is pumped through the carbon filters by
the air stripper sump pump. The carbon filters are valved such
that any one or all of the filters may be used. Currently, two
of the carbon filters are used for the outer tier system. After
flowing through the carbon filters, the effluent is discharged
into the first polishing pond prior to being discharged through
the plant's NPDES outfall.
5050H185
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
operable Unit 1 Quarterly Status Report
February 1990 to May 1990
Hoechst Celanese/Shelby, NC
Westinghouse Project 4124-85-050H
Document control 85050H-0235
Page 2-1
2,0 INNER TIER TREATMENT SYSTEM
2,1 Influent Water Quality
The average, minimum, and maximum of the influent water quality
parameter concentrations are shown in Appendix I. Total organic
carbon (TOC) ranged from a minimum of 799 mg/1 to a maximum of
2300 mg/1 and averaged 1375 mg/1. Influent water was analyzed
for total organic halogens (TOX) in February, March, and April,
and concentrations were 2.10 mg/1, 0.41 mg/1, and 0.19 mg/1,
respectively. The pH of the influent averaged 5.53 prior to
neutralization.
2.2 Inner Tier Treatment Processes
The average influent pH during the quarter was 5.53 and was
adjusted to a target of 7.5 prior to solids precipitation using
caustic addition. Solids/metals precipitation occurs after the
pH of the influent is properly adjusted. The system has
operated as designed during this period and is expected to
continue operating adequately.
Based on the influent data, ammonia and phosphorous addition was
required in the SBR. Ammonia concentrations ranged from a
5050H186
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Operable Unit 1 Quarterly status Report
February 1990 to May 1990
Hoechst Celanese/Shelby, NC
Westinghouse Project 4124-85-050H
Document Control 85050H-0235
Page 2-2
minimum of 0.52 mg/1 to a maximum of 32.60 mg/1 and averaged
8.67 mg/1. Phosphorous concentrations ranged from a minimum of
0.12 mg/1 to a maximum of 4.32 mg/1 and averaged 1.06 mg/1.
Typically, the ratio of 100 to 5 to 1 for BOD, ammonia-nitrogen,
and phosphorous, respectively is needed for good biological
treatment. Nitrogen was added once a day, when needed, to
equalize the ammonia-nitrogen concentration in the SBR. Doses
ranged from 1 quart to 6 quarts.
Based on effluent data, the SBR is performing fairly well. The
data show that approximately 91.1% TOC and 75.7% COD were
removed in the treatment system. TOX and BOD removal
efficiencies were 83.2% and 95.8% respectively; however, these
removal efficiencies were calculated from two or less values.
Therefore, the TOX and BOD values should not be used as a
measure of evaluating system performance. Appendix I includes
the average, minimum, and maximum influent and effluent
concentrations and percent removals.
The SBR unit began experiencing problems during October 1989.
At that time, the SBR died, and the ability to maintain an
active biomass in the system became subsequently more
difficult. Problems with the SBR unit have continued into this
quarter. The SBR unit experienced a biomass kill in early
5050H186
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Operable Unit 1 Quarterly Status Report
February 1990 to May 1990
Hoechst Celanese/Shelby, NC
Westinghouse Project 4124-85-050H
Document control 85050H-0235
Page 2-3
February, experienced a biomass upset in late March, and slight
problems continued throughout April. Inner tier well IT-1 was
down for a short time in March due to repairs, and when
restarted, a biomass upset occurred in the SBR. The upset
appeared to correlate with the restart of IT-1; therefore, IT-1
was taken out of the system throughout April. The actual cause
of problems with the unit are unknown; however, data obtained
from the influent water indicates that shock organic loadings
are possibly a factor, and it appears that inner tier well IT-1
is the suspect well. A sample from IT-1 was collected on
February 26, 1990 and analyzed for ethylene glycol, GC/MS
purgeables, base/neutral/acid (B/N/A) extractables, BOD, COD,
Ammonia-N, TOC, temperature, pH, and conductivity. Results
showed an ethylene glycol concentration of 26,000 ppm and a
benzene concentration of 5 ppb. B/N/A compounds benzoic acid
(170 ppb) and benzyl alcohol (32 ppb) were detected. BOD, COD,
and TOC concentrations were measured at 30,000 ppm, 48,000 ppm,
and 14,000 ppm, respectively. Ammonia-N was detected at <0.1
ppm, temperature was 16.2°c, pH was 5.19, and conductivity was
3430 umhos/cm. These results show extremely elevated levels of
BOD, COD, and TOC in the well. Ethylene glycol was also heavily
concentrated in the well. These data are included at the end of
Appendix I.
5050H186
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Operable Unit 1 Quarterly Status Report
February 1990 to May 1990
Hoechst Celanese/Shelby, NC
Westinghouse Project 4124-85-050H
Document Control 85050H-0235
Page 2-4
Well IT-3 was also sampled on February 26, 1990. BOD, COD,
ammonia-N, pH, and conductivity of this well were 560 mg/1, 860
mg/1, 290 mg/1, 1.3 mg/1, 5.90, and 845 umhos/cm, respectively.
Since these values are more in line with what is routinely
processed at the SBR, Well IT-3 is continuing to operate. These
data are also included at the end of Appendix I.
Table 2-1 presents SBR influent and effluent COD values since
February 1, 1989. This table illustrates that the SBR biomass
kill in February appeared to correlate with a sharp rise of
influent COD above equilibrium conditions. A rise of influent
COD was also evident at the end of March when a biomass upset
occurred. Examination of the effluent COD values shows that the
biomass recovers slowly, and reseeding is needed to initiate
further treatment.
Figure 2-1 and 2-2 graph the influent and effluent SBR COD
versus time since November 1, 1989. In February and March when
an SBR kill and upset occurred, the SBR effluent COD values
increased slowly. The SBR was reseeded and recovery was
evident. overall, the operation and recovery rate was better
than the previous quarter when the effluent COD values increased
sharply upon encountering an influent COD shock loading.
5050H186
--- -- -- -- -- --
TABLE 2-1 -INFLUENT AND SBR EFFLUENT COD DATA
SBR
INFLUENT EFFLUENT INFLUENT
DATE COD COD DATE COD
2/1/90 8,250 550 3/1/90 4,250
2/2/90 5,625 675 3/2/90 4,200
2/3/90 5,475 700 3/3/90 3,000
2/4/90 6,975 640 3/4/90 4,000
2/5/90 4,500 725 3/5/90 9,750
2/6/90 10,575 750 3/6/90 4,000
2/7/90 6,075 825 3/7/90 6,100
2/8/90 6,375 900 3/8/90 2,850
2/9/90 • 3/9/90 2,500
2/10/90 3/10/90 6,200
2/11/90 3/11/90 2,600
2/12/90 3/12/90 3,400
2/13/90 3/13/90 3,650
2/14/90 3/14/90 1,240
2/15/90 3/15/90 3,800
2/16/90 7,575 670 3/16/90 2,500
2/17/90 4,650 900 3/17/90 4,750
2/18/90 7,500 1,000 3/18/90 5,600
2/19/90 3,700 360 3/19/90 2,900
2/20/90 6,600 1,200 3/20/90 2,550
2/21/90 6,300 1,320 3/21/90 3,100
2/22/90 5,m 1,340 3/22/90 7,000
2/23/90 2,100 3/23/90 3,000
2/24/90 920 3/24/90 6,800
2/25/90 900 3/25/90 8,500
2/26/90 5,625 420 3/26/90 9,750
2/27/90 5,750 500 3/27/90 6,750
2'28'90 6 500 510 3/28/90
3/29/90
3/30/90
3131190
* Denotes date when SBR died
Note: During periods when no date are available,
the SBR was shut down.
SBR
EFFLUENT INFLUENT
COD DATE COD
510 4/1/90
450 4/2/90 9,375
360 4/3/90 3,000
450 4/4/90 3,000
410 4/5/90 4,000
440 4/6/90 2,825
380 4/7/90 3,375
370 4/8/90
340 4/9/90
360 4/10/90
400 4/11/90 3,400
270 4/12/90 8,850
285 4/13/90 8,500
270 4/14/90 3,850
240 4/15/90 3,750
280 4/16/90 3,350
335 4/17/90 3,350
385 4/18/90 3,450
410 4/19/90 4,000
315 4/20/90 3,500
470 4/21/90 3,400
450 4/22/90 2,400
440 4/23/90 3,000
210 4/24/90 2,200
708 4/25/90 2,150
970 4/26/90 2,700
1,340 4/27/90 2,400
4/28/90 3,000
4/29/90 2,000
740 4,30,90 3 500
680
-- -
SBR
EFFLUENT
COD
580
500
800
760
695
885
960
960
800
720
510
600
420
400
410
350
340
195
310
300
240
300
340
340
350
365
350
370
410
410
- -
:i;:
CD
(/1
rt ,-..
0:,
0 '°::,: 0 :,-0
-
0
'O CD '1 Pl tr .....
CD
C: :, ,_._
rt
C O CD '"':I f-' S C O CD CD t/1 :,-tr IC>
::J CD t/1 '1 C rt rtCPI
'ti Pl '1 0'10'1rt OOCD'<CD :, u...... '1
rt CD Pl f-' t-' '1 0 ::J 10 '< OrtCDl0
..... (/1 0 (/)
,i. CD rt
0> f-' '-rt Pl U1 "-' C/l O rt 'ti o ,i. :,-C
PIU11CD3:t/l
.COO>t-'PI
CD ::<: U1 tr'< :ti I I '< CD t-100~ f-''O I t-lU1 100 u,wo:a:1011 u,::,:oort
-------------------
Inner Tier Influent vs. SBR Effluent
Daily COD
14000 14000
* JI(
* * 12000 12000
* * l!( * * 10000 * * * * 10000
* *
* * ~
* * * * ----~ *~ * "' -8000 s ----8000 * "' ** E * --* * ***
C
* * * ., -::,
C * * ;;:: ., 0 * * ** -::, * * 6000 w
;;:: 6000 *~ E ~~ ~ * a:: co
* * *
(/)
* * * *
4000 IJl!Jil (ID ** )!(** l* * ~* 4000
* \ * ~* I * * * j!!(~ * rfl * * *** JI(* * * D * *{o * * * * 0 ** * * *)!(* 2000 ~ **~ * * (9 * rt v*** o * 2000
)!(*~* * ~o(~-* 0 ,..Alli,
-~--__ B •-~ -. -TI • 0 0 . ' 11 / 1 12/1 1 /1 1 /31 3/3 4/2 5/3
* Influent 0 SBR Effluent
WESTNGHOUSE PROJECT -4124-68-050H DATE ~ FIGURE 2-1
DESIGNED BY Westinghouse Environmental INNER TIER INFLUENT VS SBR EFFLUENT
DRA.WN BY DAILY COD
CHECKED BY and Geotechnical Services, Inc. HC/SHELBY
Fl.[ NAME WESTINGHOUSE PROJECT 4124-85-0SOH
-------------------
14,000
12,000 Ji(*
l * *
* 10,000
*
~
'-8,000 en
E * c ., * ::, 6,000 .;:
E
4,000
2,000
0
11 / 1 12/1
WESTINGHOUSE PROJECT ,12,-88-0~0H
[)[SIGNED BY
DRAWN BY
CHECKED BY
FL[ NAM£
Inner Tier Influent vs SBR Effluent
Rolling Weekly Average COD
14,000
12,000
~ 10,000
* * * **
*
*
*
~
~
* *** *~
'-* en
8,000 E
* * * * ~
* -C * ** *~ * ll( .,
:,
* .;:
* -ll( * Ji( 6,000 w
* * ~*~ * * Ck'.
* \~\\ ~ CD
* \ *
(/)
* * * lit! * * * l+E ~
~1
4,000
ll( ~~ if'
*if * 2,000
1/1 1/31 3/3 4/2
0
5/3
Week Beginning * Influent O SBR Effluent
Westinghouse Environmental
and Geotechnical Services, Inc.
FIGURE 2-2
INNER TIER INFLUENT VS SBR EFFLUENT
ROLLING WEEKLY AVERAGE COD
HC/SHELBY
WESTINGHOUSE PROJECT 4124-85-0SOH
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Operable Unit 1 Quarterly Status Report
February 1990 to May 1990
Hoechst Celanese/Shelby, NC
Westinghouse Project 4124-85-050H
Document Control 85050H-0235
Page 2-8
A sampling and testing program was recommended to help define
problems relating to the SBR unit. Document number 85050H-0216,
dated February 15, 1990, was sent to the EPA discussing
operation and testing of the SBR. A work plan discussing the
planned sampling and testing program was sent to the EPA on
March 5, 1990. Westinghouse received EPA comments on the
Proposed SBR Operational Study on April JO, 1990, issued
responses to the comments on May 10, 1990, and are awaiting
approval of the proposal so that it can be implemented. In
February, Davis & Floyd, Inc. began collecting background data
on the SBR. These data are included in Appendix II. Upon
approval by the EPA of the proposed operational study work plan,
Westinghouse and Davis and Floyd will begin an official sampling
and analysis program to determine what, if any, operational
changes need to be made to the SBR.
In the last three months of operation, the air stripping system
has worked well operationally, but it appears to remove little
contamination using TOC as a measure of contamination
reduction. The average influent and effluent TOC concentrations
were 110 mg/1 and 114 mg/1, respectively. This probably is
because very little of the influent COD consists of volatile
organic compounds.
5050H186
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Operable Unit 1 Quarterly Status Report
February 1990 to May 1990
Hoechst Celanese/Shelby, NC
Westinghouse Project 4124-85-050H
Document Control 85050H-0235
Page 2-9
In the last three months of operation, the carbon filter system
has worked well operationally, but it appears to remove little
contamination using TOC as a measure of contamination
reduction. In several cases, an increase in TOC occurs through
the carbon filter system (see data in Appendix I, specifically
2/8/90 and 2/16/90). overall, throughout the quarter, the
average TOC concentration was elevated through the carbon filter
system. The average influent and effluent TOC concentrations
were 114 mg/1 and 134 mg/1, respectively. Hoechst Celanese has
sent samples of the carbon to the equipment vendor to evaluate
the carbon condition associated with system performance.
Hoechst Celanese has contacted IEA to begin analyzing samples
for soluble organic carbon (SOC) to determine if particulate
matter are causing the elevated TOC levels. This will be
implemented on Thursday, May 24. Although effluent TOC
concentrations are elevated, effluent criteria levels are not
being exceeded, and overall contamination reduction is
satisfactory.
The inner tier pumps and controllers generally worked well
throughout the quarter, with the exception of IT-1, IT-4, and
IT-8. IT-1 experienced problems with the controllers and slight
foaming, but was returned to operation on March 21, 1990. A
3-way valve was replaced in IT-4 in March, but problems
5050H186
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Operable Unit 1 Quarterly Status Report
February 1990 to May 1990
Hoechst Celanese/Shelby, NC
Westinghouse Project 4124-85-0SOH
Document Control 85050H-0235
Page 2-10
continued with the valve into April. A check valve failed on
IT-8 and the well was down in April for replacement of the
valve. IT-1 was down throughout April because the biomass
upsets appear to correlate with the pumping of IT-1.
2.3 contract Laboratory Program (CLP) Data
2.3.1 Influent/Effluent Data
The inner tier combined influent entering the treatment system
(station #2) (see Figure 1-3 for sample locations) was sampled
and analyzed for chromium and volatile organic compounds (VOCs)
on February 9, 1990. The effluent exiting the system after
carbon adsorption (station #8) was sampled and analyzed for TCL,
TAL, and TIC compounds/analytes on February 9, 1990. On March
9, 1990, the inner tier influent and effluent samples were
analyzed for chromium. The results are summarized in Table
2-2. For a more complete listing of the results and the data
sheets, see Appendix III. Explanations of the laboratory
qualifiers used (generally single letters following the
numerical results, e.g. "J" or "B") are included at the
beginning of Appendix IX: QA/QC Data on Blanks, Matrix Spikes,
and Matrix Spike Duplicates.
5050H186
--~ 5l 0 % i -- - -- -- -- -- - --TABLE 2-2: COMPOJNDS/ANALYTES DETECTED IN INFLUENT/EFFLUENT SAMPLES: INNER & OJTER EXTRACTION TIERS TCL/TAL PARAMETERS TOTAL CONCENTRATION (ppb) f OF CCJilPOUNOS DETECTED SAMPLE DATE STAflON I ANALTZE!;! FOR r,t• TIC*• TCL* Tl~• ,r CONCS1 ,E!!!l*** 2/9/90 12 irner tier influent VOA, Cr 631.2 2150 6 10 (]1.2) 18 irner tier effluent TCL,TAL 137'5 676 4 20 .,. • 11 outer tier influent VOA, Cr 3 15 1 2 (BQL) 17 outer tier effluent TCL, TAL 0 138 0 4 .,. l/9/90 12 irner tier influent Cr .,. .,. .,. .,. (]9.2) • 18 inner tier effluent . . . . . (4.6) " 11 outer tier influent • • • . • (BQL) 17 outer Sier sttluent • • • • . lBOU • TCL coqx,u,da detected: acetone, carbon disulfide, 2·bl.ltanone, benzene, chlorobenzene, di·n-1:,.Jtylphthelete, diethylphthalate, benzotc acid, •• TIC coqx,u,da detected: trinethyl sllanol, dlchlorofluoroetthene, butanal, 2·propyl furan, tetrahydrofuran, propyl cyclopropene, 2-h~tanone, acetaldehyde (DOT), 2,2•o•ybi1-ethanol, 2,2'·bl·1,3·dioxolane --::E: ID Ill rt ..... C ::, 0 IQ :,: -0 'Cl ID 11 Ill O" I-' ID C: ::, ,_._ rt 0 ::,-0 COID'"':11-' El C O ID ID Ill ::,-O" ,o ::, ID Ill 11 C rt rtCI» 'ti Ill 11 n11n11rt OOID'<ID ::, u. I-' 11 rt ID Ill ,_. I-' 11 0 ::, 10'< OrtlDl0 I-' Ill o C/l ,1> ID rt a, ,_. '-rt Ill UIIVC/lOrt >ti o .,. ::,-C Ill U1 I ID 3: Ill IQ O a, I-' Ill ID :,: u, O" '< :,, I I '< ID t\JOO.., t-itC I "-'UI 100 ,-.wo:z:1011 ..... u,:,: no rt·
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Operable Unit 1 Quarterly Status Report
February 1990 to May 1990
Hoechst Celanese/Shelby, NC
Westinghouse Project 4124-85-050H
Document Control 85050H-0235
Page 2-12
In no case did the chromium content of samples exceed the MCL
for this metal (50 ppb). Chromium was detected in both influent
samples at concentrations of 31.2 and 39.2 parts per billion
(ppb). The effluent sample taken March 9, 1990 contained a
chromium concentration of 4.6 ppb. Five voe compounds were
detected in the influent sample taken February 9, 1990; however
the primary voe observed was acetone (470 ppb). The only voe in
the effluent sample was acetone at 1200 ppb. The elevated level
of acetone in the effluent sample is interpreted to be a
degradation product of ethylene glycol by microbial activities.
Acetone was also detected in laboratory blanks, suggesting the
possibility of the laboratory contamination.
The influent sample contained 10 Tentatively Identified
Compounds (TICs), with concentrations ranging from 30 ppb (an
unknown acid) to 600 ppb (2-propyl furan). The effluent sample
was analyzed for TCL, TAL, and TIC compounds and contained
volatiles, semi-volatiles, metals, and TICs. Base/neutral
targeted compounds di-n-butylphthalate and diethylphthalate were
detected at 5 ppb and 160 ppb, respectively. Benzoic acid was
detected at 10 ppb. Eleven metals were detected and
concentrations range from 2.4 ppb (lead) to 354,000 ppb
(sodium). Also 20 TICs were reported, most of them reported as
5050H186
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
"unknown" compounds.
Operable Unit 1 Quarterly Status Report
February 1990 to May 1990
Hoechst Celanese/Shelby, NC
Westinghouse Project 4124-85-050H
Document Control 85050H-0235
Page 2-13
2.J.2 SBR and Metals Treatment Sludge Data
A sludge sample was collected from the SBR unit and the filter
press on February 9, 1990. A complete TCL/TAL analysis was
performed on the SBR sample. In addition, a TCLP extraction and
analysis for TCLP contaminants were performed on both the SBR
and filter press sludge samples. The results of sludge analyses
are summarized in Table 2-3 and the original laboratory data
sheets are included in Appendix IV.
The predominant voe present in the SBR sludge sample was acetone
at 280 ppb. Benzoic acid was the only semi-volatile acid
compound detected in the SBR sludge sample and was measured at
84 ppb.
Twenty-two TIC compounds were detected in the SBR sludge sample
at concentrations ranging from 20 ppb to 10,000 ppb. VOA-TICs
detected were tetrahydrofuran and 3-methyl 2-butanone at 20 ppb
each. Twenty BNA-TIC compounds were detected at concentrations
ranging from 80 ppb to 10,000 ppb.
A TCLP extraction and analysis were performed on the SBR sludge
5050H186
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Operable Unit 1 Quarterly Status Report
February 1990 to May 1990
Hoechst Celanese/Shelby, NC
Westinghouse Project 4124-85-050H
Document Control 85050H-0235
Page 2-14
sample and the filter press sludge sample. The TCLP leachate
derived from the SBR and filter press sludge samples did not
contain any TCLP contaminants.
SOSOH186
-- - - --
SAMPLE DATE SLll>GE TYPE
2/9/90 SBR
" SBR
(TCLP Extract)
" Filter Press
(TCLP Extract)
* TCL coqx>t.nds detected:
VOA -acetone.
BN/A -benzoic acid.
** TIC c001)0U"'lds detected:
-
TABLE
CLP
y
y
y
- -- - -
2-3: COMPOUNDS DETECTED IN SLll>GE SAMPLES
TCL/TAL PARAMETERS TOTAL CONCENTRATION (ppb)
ANALYZED FOR TCL* TIC0
VOA 280 40
BN/A 84 27530
Pest./PCB (BQL) (BQL)
TAL
TCLP VOA (BQL) (BQL)
TCLP BN/A (BQL) (BQL)
TCLP Pest./PCB (BQL) (BQL)
TCLP TAL (BRL)***
TCLP VOA (BQL) (BQL)
TCLP BN/A (BQL) (BQL)
TCLP Pest./PCB (BQL) (BQL)
TCLP TAL BRL ***
VOA· tetrahydrofuren, 3-methyl 2-butanone
---
# Of COMPOUNDS DETECTED
TCL* TIC**
2
20
(none) (none)
(none) (none)
(none) (none)
(none) (none>
(none) (none)
(none> (none)
(none) <none>
BN/A -hexanoic acid (DOT), hexadecenoic acid, 1H·Indole·2,3-dione, 1H-indole-3-carboxaldehyde,
pentanoic acid, octadecenoic acid, b.Jtanoic acid, 2,2-dimethyl-1-octanol, 3,7-dimethyl-nonane.
*** Detected concentrations are below the regulatory levels established for the final toxic characteristic
of the TCLP leachate. (Note: no regulatory levels exist for the metals concentrations in actual sludge
se"l)les)
- - -
~ !/l rt ,.._
o::s 0 IQ ::i:
-
0 'ti (1)
11 P> tr ....
(1)
C: ::, ,.._
rt
0 P' 0 S::011>'"'1>--' SS::011>
(1) !/l P' tr ,0
::, (1) !/l 11 s::
rt rt s:: P> 'ti P> 11 n 11 n 11 rt
0 0 11> '< 11> ::, u..... 11
rtl1>P>t--' ....
11 0 :::S IO'<: 0 rt 11> \0 .... !/l O IJl .,. (1) rt
00 t--' '-rt Pl UIN!JlOrt '00 .... P' s::
P>U1111>3:!/l IQ O 00 ,-.. P>
11>:I:Ultr'<::,:J I I '< 11>
l'J O O • t--' 'ti I !'JUI \00 t--'WO:Z:\011
uiui::i:nort
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Operable unit 1 Quarterly Status Report
February 1990 to May 1990
Hoechst Celanese/Shelby, NC
Westinghouse Project 4124-85-050H
Document Control 85050H-0235
Page 3-1
3.0 OUTER TIER TREATMENT SYSTEM
3.1 Influent water Quality
The average, minimum, and maximum of the influent parameter
concentrations are shown in Appendix V. IEA data summary sheets
for the outer tier are included in Appendix I. TOC ranged from
a minimum of 3.8 mg/1 to a maximum of 10.0 mg/1 and averaged 5.8
mg/1. Influent water was analyzed monthly for TOX, and the
concentrations were 0.03 mg/1, 0.02 mg/1 and 0.03 mg/1 for
February, March, and April, respectively. The pH of the
influent averaged 6.15.
3.2 outer Tier Treatment Processes
The outer tier groundwater is pumped into a 4,500 gallon tank
for equalization to store and mix the pumped groundwater prior
to treatment. The pumping and equalization system has worked
well during this quarter.
During the last three months, the air stripping system has
worked well operationally. The average influent and effluent
TOC concentrations were 5.8 mg/1 and 5.2 mg/1, respectively.
5050Hl87
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Operable Unit 1 Quarterly Status Report
February 1990 to May 1990
Hoechst Celanese/Shelby, NC
Westinghouse Project 4124-85-0SOH
Document Control 85050H-0235
Page 3-2
During the last three months, the carbon filter system has
worked well operationally. The average influent and effluent
TOC concentrations were 5.2 mg/1 and 4.4 mg/1, respectively.
3.3 contract Laboratory Program (CLP) Influent/Effluent Data
The outer tier combined influent entering the treatment system
(station #1) was sampled and analyzed for chromium and volatile
organic compounds (VOCs) on February 9, 1990. The effluent
exiting the system after carbon adsorption (station #7) was
sampled and analyzed for TCL, TAL, and TIC compounds/analytes on
February 9, 1990. On March 9, 1990, the outer tier influent and
effluent samples were analyzed for chromium only. The results
are summarized in Table 2-2 (included in the section on the
inner tier treatment system). Appendix VI contains a more
complete summary of the results and the original data sheets.
The chromium content of all three samples was below the
instrument quantitation limit of the influent sample contained
chlorobenzene at 3 ppb, and the VOA-TICs, trimethyl silanol and
dichlorofluoromethane at 10 ppb and 5 ppb, respectively.
The effluent sample was analyzed for TCL, TAL, and TIC compounds
and contained metals and VOA-TICs. Ten metals were detected and
5050H187
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Operable Unit 1 Quarterly Status Report
February 1990 to May 1990
Hoechst Celanese/Shelby, NC
Westinghouse Project 4124-85-050H
Document Control 85050H-0235
Page 3-3
concentrations range from 1.4 ppb (beryllium) to 41,900
(sodium). Trimethyl silanol, and three "unknown" TICs were
detected at concentrations of 8 ppb and 10, 20, and 100 ppb,
respectively.
5050H187
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Operable Unit 1 Quarterly Status Report
February 1990 to May 1990
Hoechst Celanese/Shelby, NC
Westinghouse Project 4124-85-050H
Document Control 85050H-0235
Page 4-1
4.0 PUMPING SYSTEM OPERATION AND HYDROLOGIC
EFFECTS OF PUMPING
Flow meter readings were collected at each extraction well on a
daily basis. Water levels have been measured weekly at six
select monitor wells, five piezometers, and four extraction
wells. Monthly water levels were recorded for other wells and
piezometers. The boring logs and well schematics for all
extraction and monitor wells and all but six of the piezometers
are presented in the appendices of two earlier S&ME reports: a
Remedial Investigation Report prepared June, 1986 (S&ME document
control number 85050A-0056) and report entitled "PUmp Test for
Outer Tier Extraction System and Proposed Design Modifications"
prepared February, 1989 (S&ME document control number
85050H-0139). Schematics for the remaining six piezometers are
presented in Appendix VII of the Second Quarterly Status Report
for Operable Unit 1 (Westinghouse document control number
85050H-0219). Flow meter and water level readings have been
summarized in graphic and tabular form, and precede the data
sheets in Appendix VII of this report. Also included in
Appendix VII are Plates 1 through 5 which show pre-extraction
groundwater elevations (July 25, 1989) and interpreted
groundwater elevations on February 5, 1990, March 1, 1990, April
3, 1990, and May 3, 1990. The interpreted groundwater contours
5050H188
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
operable Unit 1 Quarterly Status Report
February 1990 to May 1990
Hoechst Celanese/Shelby, NC
Westinghouse Project 4124-85-0SOH
Document Control SSOSOH-0235
Page 4-2
were generated from groundwater data collected on the respective
dates. In areas where well nests (two or more wells) were
present, the deepest well was chosen to use for contour data.
several deep wells, such as those presented on Page 4-6, are
screened in bedrock. Other wells are screened at the top of
rock where auger refusal was encountered. The top of rock wells
were chosen because there is direct connection between soil and
rock saturated zones, and the top of rock wells most nearly
represent the piezometric conditions in the underlying bedrock
where rock monitor wells do not exist.
4.1 Inner Tier system
4.1.1 Flow Data
During this quarter, the average flow in inner tier wells has
ranged from 133 gallons per day (gpd) in IT-8 to 881 gpd in
IT-7. The cumulative average daily flow for all nine wells was
3353 gpd. This cumulative yield is probably high due to air
being discharged into the system, resulting in "false" flow
meter activation. Water flow may not actually be occurring
through the system; however, air in flow lines will activate the
flow meters, resulting in flow meter readings that are too
high. The inner tier pump system is controlled by a high level
switch in the equalization tank which interrupts pumping after
5050H188
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Operable Unit 1 Quarterly Status Report
February 1990 to May 1990
Hoechst Celanese/Shelby, NC
Westinghouse Project 4124-85-050H
Document Control 85050H-0235
Page 4-J
the extraction system replaces the 2300 gallon batch treated in
the SBR. The wells can be divided into five subgroups based on
yield. Wells IT-1, IT-2, and IT-8 averaged less than 200 gpd.
IT-3 averaged about JOO gpd. IT-4, IT-5, and IT-6 averaged
between 400 and 500 gpd. IT-9 averaged approximately 600 gpd
and IT-7 averaged approximately 900 gpd. Inner tier extraction
wells IT-5, IT-6, and IT-7, and IT-9 functioned most
consistently. spurious readings occasionally recorded for well
IT-4 appear to have raised the average pumping rates reported
for the well.
4.1.2 Groundwater Elevations
Water levels in the inner tier area are represented by monitor
wells:
J-28
J-59
K-28
N-29
N-53
0-25
0-59
U-38
V-23
Y-38
Y-74
CC-38
CC-64
Water levels in these wells were measured on February 5, 1990,
March 1, 1990, April 3, 1990, and May 3, 1990. The water levels
in all wells rose from February 5 to March 1. Water level
increases ranged from 0.06 ft (0-25) to 4.45 ft (Y-74), with
most wells experiencing an increase in water level greater than
1 ft. Some wells continued to experience a slight rise in water
level (generally less than 0.5 ft) between March 1 and April 3;
5050H188
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Operable Unit 1 Quarterly Status Report
February 1990 to May 1990
Hoechst Celanese/Shelby, NC
Westinghouse Project 4124-85-050H
Document Control 85050H-0235
Page 4-4
however, most wells experienced a slight drop in water levels
during this period. All wells experienced a drop in water level
from April 3 to May 3. Decreases in water levels ranged from
0.60 ft (0-25) to 3.15 (V-23) ft. These trends are attributable
to variations in rainfall. Rainfall readings taken at the
HC/Shelby facility indicate rainfall totals of 4.65 in, 7.05 in,
5.35 in, and 2.40 in for January, February, March, and April,
respectively. Rainfall data are included in Appendix VII.
Water level rises were greater in wells located at the
northeastern end of the extraction system than wells directly
adjacent to the extraction system. Average water level rises in
the 'N' and 'Y' well nests, located at the northeastern end of
the extraction tier, were 2.45 ft and 2.98 ft, respectively.
Average water level rises in the 'V' and 'K' wells, located
directly adjacent to the inner tier pumping wells, ranged from
1.56 ft to 1.89 ft.
Both 'O' wells, located midway and east of the extraction
system, experienced water level rises of less than 1 ft.
Remaining wells experienced intermediate changes in water level.
As previously stated, most increases in water levels occurred
between February 5 and March 1. After March 1, a steady
decrease in water levels occurred throughout the rest of the
SOSOH188
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Operable Unit 1 Quarterly Status Report
February 1990 to May 1990
Hoechst Celanese/Shelby, NC
Westinghouse Project 4124-B5-050H
Document Control 85050H-0235
Page 4-5
quarter. The wells which had the greatest increase in water
levels at the beginning of the quarter also yielded the greatest
decrease toward the end of the quarter.
4.2 outer Tier system
4.2.1 Flow Data
Evaluation of the outer tier flow data for this quarter shown in
Appendix VII shows that the wells fall into distinct groups
based on average yields. Wells OT-1 and OT-2 yielded between
16,000 and 24,000 gpd with the average flow in the two wells of
approximately 20,000 gpd. Wells OT-5 and OT-8 yielded between
7,200 and 7,350 gpd and the average flow in the wells was
approximately 7,265 gpd. Outer tier wells OT-3, OT-4, and OT-7
yielded less than 4000 gpd. Outer tier well OT-6 yielded
approximately 12,000 gpd for the 3-month period. These yields
are consistent with the previous quarter.
Overall, the outer tier pumping and metering system has
functioned well during this quarter, with occasional spurious
flow readings being generated. Wells OT-3 and OT-7 appear to be
pumping at their maximum capacity. The pumping rate in wells
OT-4, OT-5, OT-6, and OT-8 could be increased to lower water
levels another 10 to 15 feet. The pumping rate in wells OT-1
5050H188
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
operable Unit l Quarterly Status Report
February 1990 to May 1990
Hoechst Celanese/Shelby, NC
Westinghouse Project 4124-85-050H
Document Control 85050H-0235
Page 4-6
and OT-2 could be increased to lower water levels another 35 to
45 feet. It will be necessary to replace the existing pumps in
these two wells with larger pumps to produce more groundwater
capture in this area.
4.2.2 Groundwater Elevation
Water levels in the outer tier are represented by the following
monitor wells and piezometers:
M-44 (*)
P-31
P-58 (rock)
Q-33
R-17
R-42
T-17
T-35
T-58 (rock)
Z-78
AA-41
AA-54
DD-58
EE-58
FF-23
FF-34
FF-62
GG-25
GG-39
GG-61
PZ-1 (rock)
PZ-2
(*) (rock) PZ-3
(rock) PZ-4 ( *) (rock)
PZ-5A (rock)
PZ-5B (rock)
(rock) PZ-6A
PZ-6B
PZ-7A (rock)
(rock) PZ-7B (rock)
NOTE: The"(*)" designation indicates wells that are
relatively far from the extraction wells, and the
"(rock)" designation indicates the wells are screened
into the bedrock.
Water levels of these wells were measured on February 5, 1990,
March l, 1990, April 3, 1990, and May 3, 1990. In addition,
weekly water level measurements were taken at monitor wells
M-44, R-42, T-17, T-35, T-58, and EE-58 and piezometers PZ-1,
PZ-2, PZ-3, PZ-4, and PZ-5A. The more frequent readings were
being taken to monitor the effects of increased pumping of OT-1
and OT-2. It is recommended that the weekly water level
measurements be returned to the monthly schedule until the pumps
5050H188
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Operable Unit 1 Quarterly Status Report
February 1990 to May 1990
Hoechst Celanese/Shelby, NC
Westinghouse Project 4124-85-050H
Document Control 85050H-0235
Page 4-7
in wells OT-1 and OT-2 are replaced with higher capacity pumps
and the pumping in OT-1 and OT-2 is further increased.
In general, the change in water level elevation has been small
for the period February 1, 1990 through May 3, 1990. Drawdown
was not observed in any of the outer tier monitor wells or
piezometers. Increases in water levels ranging from 0.26 ft
(T-35) to 3.16 ft (PZ-5A) were recorded in many
wells/piezometers. Based on the available data, it is difficult
to conclude whether rock wells have been more affected by
pumping than the shallow wells screened in soil and weathered
rock. Of the six well nests for which data were available, none
of the well nests showed a net drawdown.
Examination of the water levels in pumping wells shows that they
have continued to operate at varying degrees of effectiveness in
obtaining the maximum possible drawdown in the well. As of May
3, 1990, wells OT-3 and OT-7 have generally drawn the water down
to near the top of the pump. Wells OT-4, OT-5, OT-6, and OT-8
typically have about 10 to 15 feet of water above the pump.
Wells OT-1 and OT-2 have about 35 to 45 feet of water above the
pump. The pumping rate in the latter five wells should,
therefore, be increased to draw the water level down close to
the top of the pump. The pumps in wells OT-1 and OT-2 should be
SOSOH188
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Operable Unit 1 Quarterly status Report
February 1990 to May 1990
Hoechst Celanese/Shelby, NC
Westinghouse Project 4124-85-0SOH
Document Control 85050H-0235
Page 4-8
replaced with higher capacity models to increase the drawdown at
these locations.
In the first and second quarterly reports, the recommendation
was made to install two additional extraction wells, one midway
between OT-6 and OT-7 and the second midway between OT-7 and
OT-8, to increase the effectiveness of the extraction system in
these areas. Approval has been granted by the EPA to install
these wells. During the third quarter, piezometers PZ-6A and
PZ-6B, positioned midway between OT-6 and OT-7, showed an
increase in water level (approximately 1.50 ft). Water levels
in this region are 10 to 30 feet higher than water levels in the
vicinity of pumping wells OT-6 and OT-7, suggesting that an
additional pumping well is needed to improve the effectiveness
of the pumping in this area. A similar difference in water
level exists between pumping wells OT-7 and OT-8 and piezometers
PZ-7A and PZ-7B installed between them. Piezometers PZ-7A and
PZ-7B recorded a rise in water level during the period February
5, 1990 to May 3, 1990. Both observations confirm the need for
another extraction well between wells OT-7 and OT-8 to improve
the efficiency of the system in removing water from this
intermediate area.
The first and second quarterly reports recommended the
5050H188
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Operable Unit 1 Quarterly Status Report
February 1990 to May 1990
Hoechst Celanese/Shelby, NC
Westinghouse Project 4124-85-0SOH
Document Control 85050H-0235
Page 4-9
installation of six piezometers along the outside edges of the
outer extraction tier, adjacent to OT-5, OT-6, and OT-7. These
would provide the additional water level information needed to
measure the effects of the pumping wells in this area. Approval
has been granted by the EPA to install these piezometers.
The data developed during this quarter supplement the first and
second quarters information. We recommend the following to
increase the overall efficiency of the outer tier extraction
system:
0
0
0
the placement of higher capacity pumps in wells OT-1
and OT-2
the installation of additional extraction wells between
wells OT-6 and OT-7 and between wells OT-7 and OT-8
the use of the pumps from wells OT-1 and OT-2 in the
new extraction wells
o the installation of the proposed six piezometers
After review of the first and second quarterly reports, EPA has
started that these recommendations appear to be sound.
Therefore, these activities will be scheduled by Hoechst
Celanese.
5050H188
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Operable Unit 1 Quarterly Status Report
February 1990 to May 1990
Hoechst Celanese/Shelby, NC
Westinghouse Project 4124-85-050H
Document Control 85050H-0235
Page 5-1
5.0 GROUNDWATER QUALITY
Groundwater quality was monitored with 11 monitor wells and 5
residential wells to represent the conditions during the third
quarter of operation of the treatment system. Monitor wells
GG-61, HH-48, EE-58, FF-34, FF-62, T-35, AA-54, P-58, CC-33,
K-28, V-23, Stein residence, Martin residence, and Walker
residence were sampled and analyzed for chromium and volatile
organics. The old and new potable wells at the Lambert
residence were analyzed for TCL and TAL parameters. Three
samples taken on February 7, 1990 were sampled by the EPA and
bear identification numbers EE-59, FF-12, and II-36. Samples
EE-59 and FF-12 were analyzed for TCL and TAL parameters, and
sample II-36 was analyzed for CLP metals only. In addition,
seven monitor wells were sampled and analyzed for chromium only
on March 6, 1990. All analyses were performed in accordance
with CLP procedures. Ten of the monitor wells represent on-site
groundwater quality (three inner tier (Table 5-1) and seven
outer tier (Table 5-2)). Monitor well HH-48 and the five
residential wells represent off-site groundwater quality (Table
5-3). Results of EPA samples are included with outer tier well
data. The laboratory data and summary tables of the data are
presented in Appendix VIII.
SOSOH189
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
operable Unit 1 Quarterly Status Report
February 1990 to May 1990
Hoechst Celanese/Shelby, NC
Westinghouse Project 4124-85-0SOH
Document Control 85050H-0235
Page 5-2
TABLE 5·1: COMPOUNDS/ANALTTES DETECTED IN INNER TIER MONITOR WELLS
TCL/TAL PARAMETERS TOTAL CONC.(ppb)••• # OF COMPOUNDS DETECTED
SA14PLE DATE I/ELL # ANALYZED FOR TCL/TAL• TIC-* TCL/TAL• T}~*
2/15/90 CC-33 VOA 112 1D 3
Cr
2/2D/90 K·28 VOA 670 5D4D 2 9
Cr
2/26/90 V-23 VOA 435 1320 4 10
Cr
3/6/90 (·28 Cr
" V·23 Cr 221
" C ·33 Cr
• TCL c~ detected: acetone, 2-butanone, benzene, chlorobenzene.
•• TIC c~ detected: butanalj tetrahydrofuran; 2-propyl·furan; 2-methyl-propanal;
ethyl ester butanoic acid; hexanal; acetaldehyde (DOT); propyl-cyclopropane;
2-heptanone; 2 ll"lknolil'1 hydrocarbons; 3 111knowns.
••• Metals are identified and their concentrations shown only if they exceed the MCL.
5050H189
The total nuii:>er of metals detected (i.e. cone.> quantitation limit) is shown
in the sixth colurn.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Operable Unit 1 Quarterly Status Report
February 1990 to May 1990
Hoechst Celanese/Shelby, NC
Westinghouse Project 4124-85-0SOH
Document Control 85050H-0235
Page 5-3
TABLE 5-2: ctllPOUNDS/ANALYTES DETECTED IN OUTER TIER MONITOR IIELLS
TCL/TAL PARAMETERS TOTAL COHC-(ppb)••• # OF COMPOUNDS DETECTED
SAMPb~ ~AT~ !!libb # ANAb YlED FOR TCL£Ti!L* TIC--* TCb£TAL• TIC**
2/6/90 GG-61 VOA
Cr
2/7/90 EE-58 VOA
Cr
" FF-34 VOA
Cr
" FF-62 VOA 3
Cr
" T-35 VOA 35 80 4 3
Cr ,
2/8/90 P-58 VOA 20
Cr
" AA-54 VOA
Cr
" EE-59 VOA
BN/A 20
Pe&t./PCB
TAL 3
" FF-12 VOA 371 30 10 1
BN/A 417 74 12 8
Pest ./PCB 2. 7 4
TAL 11.9(Cd), 11.2(Sel 21
" 11-36 TAL 8
3/6/90 T-35 Cr
• EE-58 Cr
" FF-1 Cr
* TCL c0lt1)0Uld:a detected: vinyl chloride; methylene chloride; 1,2-dichloroethene(total>;
1,2-dichloroethane; 1,1,1-trichloroethene; branodichloromethane; cis-1,3·
dichloropropene; dibromochloronethane; trans•1,3·dichloropropene, tetrachloroethene;
nitrobenzene; nepthalene; 4-chloroaniline; 2,6-dinitrotoluene; anthracene;
di·n·butylphthalate; chrysene; bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate; benzo(a)pyrene; phenol;
2-methylphenol; 2,4,6·trichlorophenol; ganrna-BHC; heptachlor; endosulfan I; dieldrin.
•• TIC c0lt1)0Uld:a detected: trimethyl silanol; dichlorofluoro·methane; 1,2-dichloro-1,1,2-
t-ethene; trichlorofluoromethene; 2-methylp. octedecenoic acid; 1 substituted phenol;
1 1.r1knolin acid; 1 rinown hydrocarbon; 5 1.11knowns.
••• Metal& ere identified and their concentrations shown only if they exceed the MCL.
5050H189
The total l'1Uli:>er of metal ■ detected (i.e. cone.> quantitetion limit) ia shown
in the sixth col~.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Operable Unit 1 Quarterly Status Report
February 1990 to May 1990
Hoechst Celanese/Shelby, NC
Westinghouse Project 4124-85-0SOH
Document Control 85050H-0235
Page 5-4
TABLE 5-3: CllMPQJNDS/ANALTTES DETECTED IN OFF-SITE WELLS
TCL/TAL PARAMETERS TOTAL CONC.(ppb)*** # OF COMPOUNDS DETECTED
SAMPLE DATE WELL # ANAL TZED FOR TCL/TAL* TJC** TCLJTAL* TIC**
2/6/90 HH-48 VOA 150
Cr
2/B/90 LAMBERT VOA
(OLD) BN/A 10
TAL 8
" LAMBERT VOA
(NEW) BN/A 20
TAL 9
2/16/90 STEIN VOA
Cr
" MARTIN VOA
Cr
" WALKER VOA
Cr
• TCL c~ detected: trichloroethene.
•• TIC c~ detected: 2 substituted phenols, 1 16\known.
••• Metals are identified and their concentrations shown only if they exceed the MCL.
5050H189
The total rumer of metals detected (i.e. cone.> quantitation limit) is shown
in the sixth colurn.
2
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Operable Unit 1 Quarterly Status Report
February 1990 to May 1990
Hoechst Celanese/Shelby, NC
Westinghouse Project 4124-85-050H
Document Control 85050H-0235
Page 5-5
s.1 on-site Groundwater Quality
s.1.1 Background Groundwater Area
Background water quality is represented by monitor well C-49.
Monitor well C-49 was not sampled this quarter. Analyses from
last quarter showed that only one unknown TIC was detected.
Last quarter, detected metal concentrations were all below the
Maximum contaminant Levels (MCLs) established by the Safe
Drinking Water Act and the concentration of chromium was
determined to be below the sample quantitation limit.
s.1.2 Inner Tier Area
Groundwater quality in the vicinity of the inner tier is
represented by wells K-28, V-23, and CC-33. Samples were
collected on February 15, 1990 (C-33), February 20, 1990 (K-28),
and February 26, 1990 (V-23) and analyzed for chromium and/or
volatile organics. On March 6, 1990, samples were collected for
all three wells and analyzed for chromium only. The results of
all analyses are summarized in Table 5-1.
Chromium was detected in samples taken March 6, 1990. All three
samples contained detectable levels of chromium with a reported
concentration of 30.6 ppb in K-28, 4.7 ppb in CC-33, and 221 ppb
5050H189
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
in V-23.
Operable Unit 1 Quarterly Status Report
February 1990 to May 1990
Hoechst Celanese/Shelby, NC
Westinghouse Project 4124-85-050H
Document control 85050H-0235
Page 5-6
Volatile organic analyses of samples from wells CC-33 contained
detectable quantities of acetone (10 ppb), benzene (81 ppb), and
chlorobenzene (21 ppb). The detected concentration of benzene
exceeds the MCL for this compound (5 ppb), while the
concentration of chlorobenzene is below its established MCL
(1000 ppb). The only VOA-TIC detected in this sample was 10 ppb
of tetrahydro-furan. Volatile organics analyses of sample K-28
contained detectable quantities of acetone (390 ppb) and
2-butanone (280 ppb). Nine VOA-TIC compounds were detected with
quantities ranging from 70 ppb to 1000 ppb. Volatile organic
analyses of sample V-23 contained detectable quantities of
acetone (340 ppb), 2-butanone (38 ppb), benzene (31 ppb), and
chlorobenzene (26 ppb). Ten VOA-TIC compounds were detected
with quantities ranging from 10 ppb to 300 ppb.
In general, inner tier monitor well analyses from this quarter
appear to correlate with last quarter analyses. Chromium
contents in wells K-28, V-23, and CC-33 were similar to
quantities detected last quarter, with the results within 8 to
10 ppb of the preceding concentrations. The kind and number of
volatile organics and VOA-TICs detected this quarter were
similar to the number and kind detected in last quarter's
samples.
5050H189
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
s.1.J outer Tier Area
operable Unit 1 Quarterly Status Report
February 1990 to May 1990
Hoechst Celanese/Shelby, NC
Westinghouse Project 4124-85-050H
Document Control 85050H-0235
Page 5-7
Groundwater quality in the vicinity of the outer tier is
represented by wells P-58, T-35, AA-54, EE-58, FF-34, FF-62, and
GG-61. Samples were collected on February 6, 1990, February 7,
1990, and February 8, 1990. On March 6, 1990, wells T-35,
EE-58, and FF-34 were sampled and analyzed for chromium only.
The results of all analyses are summarized in Table 5-2.
Of the nine samples collected from outer tier monitor wells
during February 1990, only two contained detectable quantities
of chromium. The sample collected from well T-35 and February
7, 1990 contained 6 ppb chromium and the FF-12 submitted by EPA
on February 8, 1990 contained 14.5 ppb chromium.
Seven wells were sampled and analyzed for volatile organics.
The samples can be broadly grouped into three categories based
on well location. Wells EE-58, FF-34, FF-62, and GG-61 lie in
the central portion of the outer tier. Well T-35 lies at the
southwest end of the outer tier. Wells AA-54 and P-58 lie at
the northeast end of the outer tier.
No voe and TIC compounds were detected in samples from wells
AA-54, EE-58, FF-34, and GG-61. The sample from well FF-62
5050H189
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
operable Unit 1 Quarterly status Report
February 1990 to May 1990
Hoechst Celanese/Shelby, NC
Westinghouse Project 4124-85-050H
Document Control 85050H-0235
Page 5-8
contained methylene chloride at 3 ppb and did not contain any
TICs. Well P-58 did not contain any voes and only one TIC,
trimethyl silanol, at 20 ppb.
The sample from well T-35 contained 1,2-dichloroethene (total),
chloroform, 1,2-dichlorethane, and benzene at less than or equal
to 18 ppb. It also contained TICs totaling 80 ppb comprised of
trimethyl silanol (30 ppb), dichlorofluoromethane (40 ppb), and
l,2-dichloro-1,1,2-T-ethane (10 ppb).
Samples EE-59, FF-12, and II-36 are EPA samples. EE-39 and
FF-12 were analyzed for TCL and TAL parameters. It appears that
sample FF-12 was spiked. The sample contained several volatile
organic compounds, base/neutral and acid compounds, and
pesticides which have not been detected in previous samples.
several metals were contained in the sample with results ranging
from 0.84 ppb (mercury) to 965 ppb (aluminum). The sample also
contained 19.9 ppb cyanide. Most of these metals were not
detected in other samples. Sample EE-59 appears to be an actual
well water sample that had not been spiked. The sample
contained the metals barium, calcium, and zinc and one TIC (a
substituted phenol). Sample II-36 was analyzed for CLP metals
only. It is unknown whether II-36 was spiked; however, it
contains aluminum at 96,200 ppb and iron at 120,000 ppb. These
are elevated levels that have not been reported in other
5050H189
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
samples.
Operable Unit 1 Quarterly Status Report
February 1990 to May 1990
Hoechst Celanese/Shelby, NC
Westinghouse Project 4124-85-050H
Document Control 85050H-0235
Page 5-9
The third quarter results from outer tier wells are similar to
results from the second quarter. Volatile organics and TIC
compounds were not abundant in most of the outer tier monitor
wells. Well T-35 contained four volatiles organics and three
TIC compounds. The voes and TICs detected this quarter were
similar to those detected last quarter.
5.2 Off-site Groundwater Quality
Groundwater quality off-site is represented by monitor well
HH-48 and potable supply wells at the Lambert, Stein, Martin,
and Walker residences (Table 5-3). The sample from HH-48 was
analyzed for volatile organics and chromium only. Residence
wells stein, Martin, and Walker were analyzed for volatile
organics and chromium. A TCL/TAL scan, excluding pesticides and
PCB analyses, was performed on the Lambert residence old and new
potable supply wells.
Trichloroethene (150 ppb) was the only volatile organic compound
detected in the sample from monitor well HH-48. No TIC
compounds were identified in the sample. Chromium (8.4 ppb) was
detected in the Stein residence well. No volatiles or TICs were
detected in the well. The Martin and Walker residence wells did
5050H189
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
operable Unit 1 Quarterly Status Report
February 1990 to May 1990
Hoechst Celanese/Shelby, NC
Westinghouse Project 4124-85-0S0H
Document Control 85050H-0235
Page 5-10
not detect any compounds above the quantitation limits.
Eight metals and one TIC compound was detected in the Lambert
"old" well. The metals detected were barium (21.6 ppb),
beryllium (0.85 ppb), calcium (10,300 ppb), iron (30.7 ppb),
magnesium (1680 ppb), potassium (1590 ppb), sodium (1930 ppb),
and zinc (54.0 ppb). The only TIC compound detected was a
substituted phenol at 10 ppb.
Nine metals and two TICS were detected in the Lambert "new"
well. Metals detected in the sample were barium (11.7 ppb),
calcium (24,900 ppb), iron (2010 ppb), lead (4.1 ppb), magnesium
(5610 ppb), manganese (51.6 ppb), potassium (3630 ppb), sodium
(8650 ppb), and zinc (952 ppb). The two TICs detected were a
substituted phenol at 10 ppb and an "unknown" at 10 ppb.
5050H189
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Operable Unit 1 Quarterly Status Report
February 1990 and May 1990
Hoechst Celanese/Shelby, NC
Westinghouse Project 4124-85-0SOH
Document Control 85050H-0235
Page 6-1
6.0 QUALITY ASSURANCE/QUALITY CONTROL
Quality Assurance/Quality Control (QA/QC) were in accordance
with the Project Operations Plans and Region IV Standard
Operating Procedures. The analyses were done by Hoechst
Celanese personnel for routine operational parameters, by
Industrial and Environmental Analysts, Inc. (IEA) for TOC, TOX,
nutrients, chromium, TCL and TAL analyses, and by Davis & Floyd,
Inc. for background SBR Operational Study parameters. All
chromium, TCL, and TAL analyses were in accordance with Contract
Laboratory Program Protocols.
Appendix IX presents the results of blanks, matrix spikes, and
matrix spike duplicates.
5050H189
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Operable Unit 1 Quarterly Status Report
February 1990 to March 1990
Hoechst Celanese/Shelby, NC
Westinghouse Project 4124-85-0SOH
Document Control SSOSOH-0235
Page 7-1
7.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Two types of data were collected during the third quarter of
operation of extraction and remediation systems at the Hoechst
Celanese site in Shelby, North Carolina.
Flow data and water level data were used to evaluate the
effectiveness of pumping in the inner and outer tier extraction
systems. The following conclusions and recommendations are made
based on interpretation of this data.
0
0
0
5050H191
The inner tier extraction system continued to
experience some problems during the third quarter.
Flow meters gave occasional spurious readings due to
air being introduced into the lines, generating "false"
flow meter activation. The inner tier pumps and
controllers generally worked well throughout the
quarter, with the exception of IT-1, IT-4, and IT-8.
IT-1 experienced problems with the controllers and
slight foaming, but was returned to operation on March
21, 1990. A 3-way valve was replaced in IT-4 in March,
but problems continued with the valve into April. A
check valve failed on IT-8 and the well was down in
April for replacement of the valve. IT-1 was also down
in April because SBR problems appear to correlate with
the pumping of IT-1.
From February 1990 through April 1990, the inner and
outer tier wells have pumped approximately 240,000 and
6,700,000 gallons, respectively. The inner and outer
tier wells averaged a reported 3350 and 75,000 gallons
per day, respectively. The inner tier quantity is
overestimated because of problems with flow meters.
Pumping in the inner and outer tier wells produced
little or no drawdown in most on-site wells during the
third quarter. The water level in all wells rose from
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
!I
I
Operable Unit 1 Quarterly Status Report
February 1990 to March 1990
Hoechst Celanese/Shelby, NC
Westinghouse Project 4124-85-0SOH
Document Control BSOSOH-0235
Page 7-2
February 5 to March 1. Water level increases ranged
from 0.06 ft to 4.45 ft, with most wells experiencing
an increase in water level greater than 1 ft. A slow
drop in water level occurred throughout the rest of the
quarter. These trends are attributable to variations
in rainfall.
o Well drawdown data continued to indicate the need for
two additional outer tier extraction wells: one
between OT-6 and OT-7, and one between OT-7 and OT-8.
Six additional piezometers (also recommended
previously) are needed to better define the water table
in this area. After review of the first and second
quarterly status reports, approval of these
recommendations has been granted by the EPA.
Analytical data were used to evaluate: 1) the operating
efficiency of the treatment system and 2) the extent of
groundwater contamination in and adjacent to the Hoechst
Celanese site. The following conclusions and recommendations
are drawn from the results:
0
0
5050H191
Analytical data indicates that the treatment system is
performing fairly well. However, problems with the SBR
unit have continued into this quarter. The SBR unit
experienced a biomass kill in early February,
experienced a biomass upset in late March, and slight
problems continued throughout April. It appears that
the SBR problems are a result of shock organic loadings
and that IT-1 may be the suspect well. Westinghouse
and David & Floyd, Inc. are awaiting approval from the
EPA on a proposed sampling and testing program to help
define problems relating to the SBR unit.
Data from sampling performed on potable supply wells
during the third quarter showed little contamination.
Chromium was detected in one of the wells, a phenol
compound was detected in two wells, and metals were
detected in two wells; however, all metal
concentrations were below the established Maximum
Contaminant Levels (MCLs). The total concentration of
Tentatively Identified Compounds (TICs) was 30 ppb in
all samples.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
5050H190
APPENDIX I
INNER TIER
INFLUENT/EFFLUENT WATER QUALITY DATA,
SUMMARY PLOTS, IEA DATA,
INNER TIER EXTRACTION WELL DATA
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
5050H190
APPENDIX I
INNER TIER
INFLUENT/EFFLUENT WATER QUALITY DATA,
SUMMARY PLOTS, IEA DATA,
INNER TIER EXTRACTION WELL DATA
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
INNER TIER
Influent
Influent roe Cn,a/ll
Influent TOX (n,a/l)
Influent Conductivity (U'lhos)
Influent pH
Influent COO Cn,a/ll
Influent BOO (n,a/l)
Influent TSS (n,a/l)
Influent NH3·N (n,a/l)
Influent Phosphate (mg/l)
Equalization Tank
Equalization Tank pH
SBR
Effluent roe (n,a/l)
Effluent COO Cn,a/l)
Effluent BOO (n,a/l)
SBR pH
MLSS (n,a/l)
MLVSS (n,a/l)
NH3·N (n,a/l)
00 Cn,a/l)
MLVSS/MLSS (ratio)
Air Stripping Tower
Effluent Stripping TOC (mg/l)
Effluent Stripping TSS (mg/l)
Carbon filter
2/1
1,700
5.82
8250
16
13
550
8.72
3120
10.30
5.4
6.20
HC/Shelby ~ater Quality Data
2/2 2/3 2/4 2/5 2/6 2/7 2/8
1,200
2. 10
1,739
5.77 5. 71 5. 76 5.66 5.57 5.60 5.50
5625 5475 6975 4500 10575 6075 6375
6083
20 15 12 21 18 14 15
16.80
0.12
110
675 700 640 725 750 825 900
173.0
8.59 8. 74 8.82 8.68 8.66 8.37 8. 70
3200 2812 3172 3140 3704 3000 3600
2360
25.50 19. 10 14.10 23.20 9.10 16. 10 31.20
5.9 4.9 5.4 5.3 3.6 5.0 5.0
0.79
140
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Carbon Effluent TOC (mg/l)
Carbon ~ffluent TOX (mg/l)
Effluent Conductivity (lli!hos)
Effluent pH
Effluent COO (mg/l)
Effluent BOO (mg/l)
X Removal TOC Effluent
X Removal TOX Effluent
X Removal COO Effluent
X Removal BOO Effluent
CUALOAT2.~KS Rev 5/21/90
4.90
99 .71%
Note: X Removals are relative to influent values
1805
8.14
750
225.00
87.65%
96.30%
98
0.21
99.98%
INNER TIER
Influent
Influent TOC (mg/l)
Influent TOX (mg/l)
Influent Conductivity (I.Jt(hos)
Influent pH
Influent COO (mg/I)
Influent BOO (mg/I)
Influent TSS (mg/I)
Influent NH3-N (mg/l)
Influent Phosphate (mg/l)
Equalization Tank
Equalization Tank pH
SBR
Effluent TOC (mg/I)
Effluent coo Cmg/1)
Effluent BOO (mg/I)
SBR pH
MLSS (mg/I)
MLVSS (mg/I)
NH3-N (mg/I)
DO (mg/I)
MLVSS/MLSS (ratio)
Air Stripping Tower
Effluent Stripping TOC (mg/l)
Effluent Stripping TSS (mg/l)
Carbon Fi l ter
Carbon Effluent TOC (mg/l)
Carbon Effluent TOX (mg/l)
Effluent Conductivity (\.Jllhos)
Effluent pH
Effluent COO (mg/l)
Effluent BOO (mg/l)
X Removal TOC Effluent
X Removal TOX Effluent
X Removal COO Effluent
X Removal 800 Effluent
OUALDAT2.~KS Rev 5/14/90
I
HC/Shelby Water Quality Data I
2/9 2/10 2/11 2/12 2/13 2/14 2/15 I
I
I
1070 950 I
8.71 8.89 9.04 9.04 9.08 8.94 9.00
3500 3520 3240 4320 3512 3100 3040
2480
28.80 23.00 17.60 43.50 41.40 15.70 18.00 I
4.5 7.6 3.4 5.5 6. 1 6.0 6.7
0.80 I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Note: X Removals are relative to influent values I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
INNER TIER
Influent
Influent TOC (mg/l)
Influent TOX (mg/l)
Influent Conductivity (i.flhos)
Influent pH
Influent COO (mg/l)
Influent BOO (mg/l)
Influent TSS (mg/I)
Influent NH3·N (mg/I)
Influent Phosphate (mg/l)
Equalization Tank
Equalization Tank pH
SBR
Effluent TOC (mg/l)
Effluent COO (rng/l)
Effluent BOO (mg/l)
SBR pH
MLSS (mg/I)
MLVSS (mg/I)
NH3·N (mg/I)
DO (mg/I)
MLVSS/MLSS (ratio)
Air Stripping Tower
Effluent Stripping TOC (mg/l)
Effluent Stripping TSS (mg/l)
Carbon Fi l ter
Carbon Effluent TOC (mg/l)
Carbon Effluent TOX (mg/l)
Effluent Conductivity (lflhos)
Effluent pH
Effluent COO (mg/l)
Effluent BOO (mg/I)
X Removal TDC Effluent
X Removal TOX Effluent
X Removal COO Effluent
X Removal BOO Effluent
QUALDAT2.~KS Rev 5/14/90
HC/Shelby ~ater Quality Data
2/16 2/17 2/18 2/19 2/20 2/21 2/22 2/23 2/24
1,600 2,300 2,160.
5.23 5.56 5.53 5.46 5.53 5.40 5.50
7575 4650 7500 3700 6600 6300 5775
20 16 25 12 48 27 15
3.46 9.00
0.76 0.92
7.02 7.22 6.90 7.28 7.40 7.68
100 320
670 900 1000 360 1200 1320 1340 2100 920
58.0 219.0 291.8
9.01 8.88 8.86 8.80 8.79 8.87 8.86 8.84 8.76
3396 3280 3364 3164 2908 2700 2960 3336 3366
2120
32.30 32.80 18.20 25.60 12.50 16. 70 33.30 20.80 31.00
6.7 4.9 5.4 6.8 4.6 6.7 6.8 5.3 8.0
0.79
n 300
130.00 270 299
7.64 8.02
860 1090
525.00 1533.00
91.88¾ 88.26¾ 86.16¾
88.65¾ 82.70¾
Note: X Removals are relative to influent values
INNER TIER
Influent
Influent roe (mg/ll
Influent TOX (mg/l)
Influent Conductivity (1.Ji!hos)
Influent pH
Influent COO (mg/I)
Influent BOO (mg/I)
Influent TSS (mg/I)
Influent NH3·N (mg/I)
Influent Phosphate (mg/l)
Equalization Tank
Equalization Tank pH
SBR
Effluent roe (mg/ I l
Effluent coo (mg/I)
Effluent BOO (mg/I)
SBR pH
MLSS (mg/ I l
MLVSS (mg/I)
NH3-N (mg/I l
DO (mg/I l
MLVSS/MLSS (ratio)
Air Stripping Tower
Effluent Stripping TOC (mg/l)
Effluent Stripping TSS (mg/l)
Carbon Filter
Carbon Effluent TDC (mg/l)
Carbon Effluent TOX (mg/l)
Effluent Conductivity (U'lhos)
Effluent pH
, Effluent COO (mg/l)
Effluent BOO (mg/l)
X Removal TOC Effluent
X Removal TOX Effluent
X Removal COO Effluent
X Removal 800 Effluent
0UALDAT2.WKS Rev 5/14/90
2/25
7.75
900
8.81
3288
20.00
5.5
HC/Shelby Water Quality Cata
2/26
6.04
5625
21
7.76
420
8.88
3280
21.00
5.8
2/27
5.63
5750
16
7.86
500
8.84
3080
19.10
4.5
2/28
5.63
6500
5
4.00
1.18
7.71
510
8.76
3364
14.00
7.5
8.19
500
92.31X
Note: % Removals are relative to influent values
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
:1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I ,,
I
I
INNER TIER
Influent
Influent TOC (mg/l)
Influent TOX (mg/l)
Influent Conductivity (U'lhos)
Influent pH
Influent COO (mg/l)
Influent BOO (mg/l)
Influent TSS (mg/l)
Influent NH3-N (mg/l)
Influent Phosphate (mg/l)
Equalization Tank
Equalization Tank pH
Effluent TOC (mg/ l l
Effluent COO (mg/l)
Effluent BOO (mg/l)
SBR pH
MLSS (mg/l)
MLVSS (mg/l)
NH3-N (mg/l)
DO (mg/l)
MLVSS/MLSS (ratio)
Air Stripping Tower
Effluent Stripping TOC (mg/l)
Effluent Stripping TSS (mg/l)
Carbon Filter
Carbon Effluent TOC (mg/l)
Carbon Effluent TOX (mg/l)
Effluent Conductivity (1.14hos)
Effluent pH
Effluent COO (mg/l)
Effluent BOO (mg/l)
X Removal TOC Effluent
X Removal TOX Effluent
X Removal COO Effluent
X Removal 800 Effluent
OUALDAT2.WKS Rev 5/14/90
HC/Shelby ~ater Quality Data
3/1 3/2 3/3 3/4 3/5 3/6
1,200
5.67 5.68 5. 71 5.81 5.65 5.86
4250 4200 3000 4000 97SO 4000
2 11 6 10 5 14
7.47 7.70 7.62 7.55 7.37 7.53
110
510 450 360 450 410 440
8.73 8.58 8.7S 8.90 8.82 9.03
4280 3368 3164 3260 2180 4556
12.70 12.70 11 .so 12.40 11.00 16.60
5.9 5.9 5.8 6.8 6. 1 6.0
110
120
90.00%
Note: X Removals are relative to influent values
3/7
963
5.69
6100
67SO
22
32.60
4.32
7.34
380
60.0
9.06
3360
2552
10.70
6.3
0. 76
1083
7.73
47SO
314
22.13%
95.35%
3/8
1,700
0.41
5.64
2850
16
42.0
370
9.08
3188
10.00
6.D
23
28
0.069
98.35%
83.17%
3/9
5.76
2500
15
340
9.03
3360
10.30
6.2
INNER TIER
Influent
Influent TOC (,rg/l)
Influent TOX (,rg/l)
Influent Conductivity CIJllhos)
Influent pit
Influent coo C,rg/l >
Influent BOO (,rg/ l)
Influent TSS (,rg/l)
Influent NH3-N (,rg/l)
Influent Phosphate (mg/l)
Equalization Tank
Equalization Tank pH
SBR
Effluent TOC (mg/l)
Effluent COO (,rg/l)
Effluent 800 (,rg/ l)
SBR pH
MLSS (mg/l)
MLVSS (,rg/l)
NH3-N (,rg/l)
00 (,rg/l)
MLVSS/MLSS (ratio)
Air Stripping Tower
Effluent Stripping TDC (mg/l)
Effluent Stripping TSS (mg/l)
Carbon Filter
Carbon Effluent TOC (mg/l)
Carbon Effluent TOX (mg/l)
Effluent Conductivity (i.Ji!hos)
Effluent pH
Effluent COO (mg/l)
Effluent BOO (mg/l)
X Removal TOC Effluent
X Removal TOX Effluent
X Removal COO Effluent
X Removal BOO Effluent
QUALDAT2.~KS Rev 5/14/90
3/10
5.61
6200
10
7.57
360
9.06
3120
11.45
7.6
HC/Shelby Water Quality Data
3/11 3/12
5.60 5.56
2600 3400
12 15
7.64 7.50
400 270
9.07 9.00
3168 3192
18.10 16.40
5.2 5.4
3/13
5.44
3650
28
7.29
285
8.92
3292
16.80
5.9
3/14
916
5.79
1240
12
9.40
0.64
7.66
270
27.8
9.01
3360
2640
10.80
5.8
0.79
8.01
360
929
70.97X
3/15
1000
5.54
3800
42
7.51
33.0
240
8.98
3160
11 .50
6. 1
32
44
95.60X
Mote: X Removals are relative to influent values
I
I
I
I
I
'.I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
INNER: TIER
Influent
Influent TOC (mg/I)
Influent TOX (mg/l)
Influent Conductivity (u4hos)
Influent pH
Influent coo (mg/I)
Influent BOO (mg/I)
Influent TSS (mg/I)
Influent NH3·N (mg/l)
Influent Phosphate (mg/l)
Equalization Tank
Equalization Tank pH
Effluent TOC (mg/I)
Effluent COO (mg/I)
Effluent BOO (mg/l)
SBR pH
MLSS (mg/I)
MLVSS (mg/ I)
NH3·N (mg/I)
DO (mg/I)
MLVSS/MLSS (ratio)
Air Stripping Tower
Effluent Stripping TOC (mg/l)
Effluent Stri_p,:,ing TSS (mg/l)
Carbon Filter
Carbon Effluent TOC (mg/l)
Carbon Effluent TOX (mg/l)
Effluent Conductivity (U'lhos)
Effluent pH
Effluent COO (mg/l)
Effluent BOO (mg/I)
X Removal TDC Effluent
X Removal TOX Effluent
X Removal COO Effluent
X Removal 800 Effluent
QUALDAT2.YKS Rev 5/14/90
HC/Shelby Water Quality Data
3/16 3/17 3/18 3/19 3/20
5.52 5.51 5.58 5.92 5.19
2500 4750 5600 2900 2550
8 14 10 55 134
7.40 7.32 7.30 7. 12 7.31
280 335 385 410 315
8.98 8.88 8.81 8.91 8.96
3208 3080 3200 3280 3320
12.20 16.80 12.50 11. 10 9.51
5.9 6.0 6. 1 6. 1 6.9
3/21
5. 17
3100
8
5.00
1. 12
7.33
470
48.9
8.98
3400
2700
12.10
6. 1
0. 79
8.57
450
150
85.48X
Note: X Removals are relative to influent values
3/22 3/23 3/24
1,209
5.31 5.24 5.42
7000 3000 6800
11 11 14
6.67
127 .5
450 440 210
8.76 8.76 8.74
3172 3208 3360
13.60 10.30 8.20
6.0 6.2 7.2
119.40
90.12X
INNER TIER
Influent
Influent TOC (mg/l)
Influent TOX (mg/l)
Influent Conductivity (1.Ji!hos)
Influent pH
Influent COO (mg/l)
Influent BOO (mg/ll
Influent TSS (mg/I)
Influent NH3·N (mg/ll
Influent Phosphate (mg/l)
Equalization Tank
Equalization Tank pH
SBR
Effluent TDC (mg/ll
Effluent coo (mg/ l l
Effluent BOO (mg/ l l
SBR pH
MLSS (mg/l)
MLVSS (mg/l)
NH3·N (mg/l)
00 (mg/ll
MLVSS/MLSS (ratio)
Air Stripping Tower
Effluent Stripping TOC Cmg/l)
Effluent Stripping TSS (mg/l)
Carbon Fi L ter
Carbon Effluent TOC (mg/l)
Carbon Effluent TOX (mg/l}
Effluent Conductivity (l.Ji!hos)
Effluent pH
Effluent COO (mg/l)
Effluent BOO (mg/l)
X Removal TOC Effluent
X Removal TOX Effluent
X Removal COO Effluent
X Removal BOO Effluent
QUALDAT2.WKS Rev S/i4/90
3/25
5.37
8500
10
7.41
708
8.70
3240
11 . so
5.8
HC/Shelby Water Quality Data
3/26
5.28
9750
8
7.42
970
8.74
3280
11 .60
6,0
3/27
5.32
6750
10
7.02
1340
8.63
3400
12.40
5.8
3/28 3/29
7.52 7. 19
8.69 8.63
3360 4736
2640
11.50 7.20
5.9 6.0
0,79
3/30
7.61
740
8.64
4368
3.90
5.9
Mote: X Removals are relative to influent values
3/31
7,61
680
8.80
3524
17.20
5.8
I
I
I
I
I
:.,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1:
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
INNER TIER
Influent
Influent TOC (mg/I)
Influent TOX (mg/l)
Influent Conductivity Cl..fillhos)
Influent pH
Influent COO (mg/l)
Influent BOO Cmg/l)
Influent TSS (mg/l)
Influent NH3-N (mg/l)
Influent Phosphate (mg/l)
Equalization Tank
Equalization Tank pH
Effluent TOC (mg/I)
Effluent COO (mg/I)
Effluent BOO (mg/I)
SBR pH
MLSS (mg/I)
MLVSS (mg/I)
NH3-N (mg/I)
DO (mg/I)
MLVSS/MLSS (ratio)
Air Stripping Tower
Effluent Stripping TDC (mg/l)
Effluent Stripping TSS (mg/l)
Carbon Fi l ter
Carbon Effluent TOC (mg/l)
Carbon Effluent TOX Cmg/l)
Effluent Conductivity (U"lhos)
Effluent pH
Effluent COO (mg/l)
Effluent BOO (mg/l)
X Removal TOC Effluent
X Removal TOX Effluent
X Removal COO Effluent
X Removal BOO Effluent
QUALDAT2.WKS Rev 5/28/90
4/1
7.64
580
9.01
3640
19.00
5.9
HC/Shelby Water Quality Data
4/2 4/3
5.40 5.40
9375 3000
15 15
3.90
0.65
7.51 7.33
500 800
9.06 8.98
3648 3764
21.00 24.50
7. 1 7.2
4/4
5.46
3000
12
7.44
760
8.96·
3884
2892
28.00
5.9
160.5
4/5
960
0.19
5.45
4000
10
7.36
140.0
695
82.2
8.95
3800
12.00
5.4
160.0
280
0.28
998
7.60
4000
443
70.83X
4/6
5.52
2825
9
7.53
885
8.88
3320
10.00
5.6
Note: X Removals are relative to influent values
4/7 4/8 4/9
5.50
3375
5
7.40 7.38 7.69
960 960 800
8.90 8.70 8.97
3480 3212 3160
12.30 10.50 16.50
6. 1 5.9 6.6
INNER TIER
Influent
Influent TOC (mg/l)
Influent TOX (mg/l)
Influent Conductivity (IJl!hos)
Influent pH
Influent COO (mg/l)
Influent BOO (mg/l)
Influer,t TSS (mg/I)
Influer,t NH3-N (mg/I)
Influent Phosphate Cmg/l)
Equalization Tank
Equalization Tank pH
Effluent TOC (mg/I)
Effluent COO (mg/l)
Effluent BOD (mg/I)
SBR pH
HLSS (mg/I)
HLVSS (mg/I)
NH3-N (mg/I)
00 Cmg/ll
MLVSS/MLSS (ratio)
Air Stripping Tower
Effluent Stripping TOC (mg/l)
Effluent Stripping TSS (mg/l)
Carbon Filter
Carbon'Effluent TOC (mg/l)
Carbon Effluent TOX (mg/l)
Effluent Conductivity (ll4hos)
Effluent pH
Effluent COO (mg/l)
Effluent BOO (mg/l)
X Removal TOC Effluent
X Removal TOX Effluent
X Removal COO Effluent
X Removal 800 Effluent
QUALDAT2.WKS Rev S/28/90
HC/Shelby Water Quality Data
4/10 4/11 4/12 4/13 4/14 4/15
1 .500
5.50 5.40 5.50 5.50 5.40
3400 8850 8500 3850 3750
10 11 12 10 8
5.40
0.44
7.60 8.00 7.90 7.10 7.50 7.70
140.0
720 510 600 420 400 410
32.2·
9.10 9.00 9.20 8.80 8.90 9.00
3368 3256 3804 3280 3212 3284
2560
6.10 20.40 11.30 16.90 17.50 15.20
6.7 6.9 6.8 6.6 6.3 6.3
160.0
160.0
Mote: X Removals are relative to influent values
4/16 4/17
5.30 5.40
3350 3350
12 10
7.30 7.20
350 340
8.70 8.80
3312 3440
5.50 7.50
5.3 4.5
4/18
5.40
3450
16
0.52
1.14
7.40
195
20.7
8.80
3580
2528
10.50
5.9
I
I
I j
I
I
:I I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
11
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
INNER TIER
Influent
Influent TDC (mg/l)
Influent TOX (mg/l)
Influent Conductivity (ll4hos)
Influent pH
Influent COO (mg/l)
Influent BOO (mg/l)
Influent TSS (mg/l)
Influent NH3·N (mg/l)
Influent Phosphate Cmg/l)
Equalization Tank
Equalization Tank pH
SBR
Effluent TOC (mg/ l l
Effluent COO (mg/ l l
Effluent 800 (mg/l l
SBR pH
MLSS (mg/l)
MLVSS (mg/l)
NH3·N (mg/l)
DO (mg/l)
HLVSS/HLSS (ratio)
Air Stripping Tower
Effluent Stripping TOC (mg/l)
Effluent Stripping TSS (mg/l)
Carbon Filter
Carbon Effluent TOC (mg/l)
Carbon Effluent TOX (mg/l)
Effluent Conductivity (1.14hos)
Effluent pH
Effluent COO (mg/ll
Effluent BOO (mg/l)
X Removal TOC Effluent
X Removal TOX Effluent
X Removal COO Effluent
X Removal BOO Effluent
0UALOAT2.~KS Rev 5/28/90
HC/Shelby ~eter Quality Data
4/19 4/20 4/21 4/22 4/23 4/24 4/25 4/26 4/27
1,000 799
5.40 5.40 5.40 5.60 5.40 5.50 5.60 5.50 5.60
4000 3500 3400 2400 3000 2200 2150 2700 2400
15 16 12 11 16 3 12 23 13
5.30
0.38
7.50 7.20 7.60 7.60 7.30 7.50 7.50 7.20 7.30
n.o
310 300 240 300 340 340 350 365 350
33.3
8.90 8.70 8.80 8.70 8.70 8.90 8.90 8.90 8.40
3180 3712 3600 3660 3920 3696 3800 3960 3240
2800
6.50 8.90 7.60 9.60 2.60 6.50 8.30 6.90 8.30
6.5 5.9 6. 1 5.9 5.9 6.3 7.6 6.8 4.9
100.0 110.2
58.0
Note: X Removals are relative to influent values
INNER TIER
Influent
Influent TOC (mg/l)
Influent TOX (mg/I)
Influent Conductivity (\.Jllhos)
Influent pH
Influent COO (mg/I)
Influent BOO (mg/l)
Influent TSS (mg/I)
Influent NH3-N (mg/l)
Influent Phosphate (mg/l)
Equalization Tank
Equalization Tank pH
SBR
Effluent TOC (mg/l)
Effluent COO (mg/I)
Effluent BOO Cmg/l)
SBR pH
HLSS (mg/I)
HLVSS (mg/I)
NH3·N (mg/I)
DO (mg/I)
MLVSS/MLSS (ratio)
Air Stripping Tower
Effluent Stripping TOC (mg/l)
Effluent Stripping TSS (mg/l)
Carbon Fi l ter
Carbon Effluent TDC (mg/l)
Carbon Effluent TOX (mg/l)
Effluent Conductivity (t.Ji4hos)
Effluent pH
Effluent coo (mg/I)
Effluent BOO (mg/l)
X Removal TOC Effluent
X Removal TOX Effluent
X Removal COO Effluent
X Removal BOO Effluent
QUALDAT2.~KS Rev 5/28/90
4/28
5.50
3000
8
7.50
370
8.90
3604
5.50
5.5
HC/Shelby ~ater Quality Data
4/29
5.50
2000
14
7.50
410
8.80
3440
5.70
5.6
4/30
5.30
3500
21
6.80
410
8.60
3260
5.00
6.8
Note: X Removals are relative to influent values
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
INNER TIER
Influent
Influent TOC (mg/I)
Influent TOX (mg/I)
Influent Conductivity (U'lhos)
Influent pH
Influent COO (mg/I)
Influent 800 (mg/I)
Influent TSS (mg/I)
Influent NH3·N (mg/I)
Influent Phosphate (mg/l)
Equalization Tank
Equalization Tank pH
SBR
Effluent TOC (mg/l)
Effluent COO (mg/l)
Effluent BOO (mg/l)
SBR pH
MLSS (mg/I)
MLVSS (mg/I)
NH3·N (mg/I)
DO (mg/I)
MLVSS/MLSS (ratio)
Air Stripping Tower
Effluent Stripping TDC (mg/l)
Effluent Stripping TSS (mg/l)
Carbon Fi l ter
Carbon Effluent TDC (mg/l)
Carbon Effluent TOX (mg/l)
Effluent Conductivity (ll4hos)
Effluent pH
Effluent COO (mg/l)
Effluent BOD (mg/l)
X Removal TDC Effluent
X Removal TOX Effluent
X Removal COO Effluent
X Removal BOO Effluent
CUALDAT2.WKS Rev 5/28/90
HC/Shelby Water Quality Data
No. S~les Average MaxilTl.lll Minirrun
14
3
2
71
71
2
71
11
11
71
11
82 ,,
89
89
11
89
89
7
12
12
3
3
8
8
7
10
1
7
2
1374.55 2300.00
0.90 2.10
1351.00 1739.00
5.53 6.04
4744.93 10575.00
6416.50 6750.00
16.45 134.00
8.67 32.60
1 .06 4.32
7.44
109.TT
587.35
95.17
8.85
3394.67
2570.18
15.22
5.98
0.79
8.00
320.00
2100.00
291.80
9.20
4736.00
2892.00
43.50
8.00
0.80
114.49 300.00
134.28 299.00
0.19 0.28
1295.33 1805.00
7.99 8.57
1595.00 4750.00
588.43 1533.00
91. 09'% 99.98X
83.17X 83.17X
75. 70X 92.31X
95.82X 96.30X
798. 70
0.19
963.00
5.17
1240,00
6083.00
2.00
0.52
0.12
6.67
13.00
195.00
20. 70
8.37
2180.00
2120.00
2.60
3.40
0.76
6.20
4.90
0.07
998.00
7,60
360.00
150.00
70.83X
83.17X
22. 13X
95.35X
Mote: X Removals are relative to influent values
--..
Vl Vl > --' :li
,Ill
Vl Vl
--' :li
-
6000.00
7000.00
6000.00
5000.00
4000.00
J000.00
2000.00
1000.00
-
.... • • • ...
+
•
-
•
-.. ----·-
MLSS vs MLVSS in SBR
•
••• • • •
• •
-.
-
•
-
•
•
-·-
• •• • • • • -• .rl' •• • .. . • •• • ••· .. _ ... . . . .... . ,,. ,,. . ,,,. ...... • • • • ■........ • •
•
• • •
• •••• •
■ ...... ·+
• • ••• +
• • ·.,· • + .+ •
+ • + •
•
• ••
+
• ......
• -. .... +
+ +
..
+
• • ••
•
+
•
•
+ +
+ + + + + +
-
o.of,.i.1-,----,-21-/-1 ----,-4;-,-----,/+J-,-----J/+-J-----... --,/r-2------;s/J
• MLSS + MLVSS
-
I
Q.
9.00
8.00
7.00
6.00
5.00
+ +
• • ,JI ....
+
. _.. .. • ... •• •
•
+
..
•
•
+
+ +
•
• •
. ••· . • • • •
+
•
• • • • . ..
• .,I'
•
• .,._
Inner Tier pH
+ +
+
+ +
• • • • •
• • • • . -....... •••. . . . .,,
• •
+
+
.. .. • •
•
•
+
+
+
+
• • • • • ..,,, .......... .
• •• • •• • ..
+
••• _ .. ·--. ·-· •
.. -
•
4·0f1+1-,-----,2+1-,-----,+;-, -----,/t_J~,-----.:3:-t:/:-3-----:4~/;:2----~5/3
• Inner Tier Influent + Inner Tier Effluent
-----------·---------
Inner Tier BOD
Influent vs. Effluent
100000 100.00%
99.50%
•
10000 99.00%
• •
+ + + + 98.50% ~ +
'-+ .,,
E ♦ ~ ~ + 98.00% " 1: 1000 + ~ + + + + ~ + + a
0 + + g ~ + + w + 97.50%
-11 ..
"" 1: Cl
~ 100 97.00% 0 m ~
Cl 96.50% 0 al
0
10 96.00%
95.50%
0
1 95.00"
11/1 12/1 1/1 1/31 3/3 4/2 5/3
• BOO Influent + BOO Effluent 0 BOO Removal "
Inner Tier TOC
Influent vs. Effluent
10000 0 0 0 100.00%
0 0 0
0 90.00% 0 0
0 0 • 0
• ..
• • • • 80.00% •
+ + + • • •
1000 • • • • • • 0 0 70.00% ~ + • ....... • + • o> • E + ++ + ~ ~ 60.00% ll( .., ~ C + !lj + + 0
IE + + > + + ~ w 100 0 + 50.00%
,.s + + Q)
"' 1: + u
!lj 0 0 + 4-0.00% 0 I--= s +
u 30.00% 0 0 I-
10
20.00%
+
10.00%
1 0.00%
11/1 12/1 1/1 1/31 3/3 4/2 5/3
• TOC Influent + TOC Effluent 0 TOC Removal %
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I t:?•'1
IEA Project#:
Client Name:
Sample# Client ID
IEA LABORATORY RESULTS
619-122
Hoechst Celanese Corporation
Parameter Results
Date
Analyzed
=================================================================================-=---===
l #1 O Tier C Inf Total Organic Carbon 7.0 mg/L 02/15/90
2 #2 I Tier C Inf Total Organic Carbon 1700 mg/L 02/15/90
3 #4 SBR Effluent Total OrganiC Carbon 13 mg/L 02/15/90
4 #5 0 Tier T Eff Total Organic Carbon 2.6 mg/L 02/15/90
5 #6 I Tier T Eff Total Organic Carbon 6.2 mg/L 02/15/90
6 #7 0 Effluent Total Organic Carbon 2.2 mg/L 02/15/90
7 #8 I Effluent Total Organic Carbon 4.9 mg/L 02/15/90
•samples collected on 02/01/90.
IEA LABORATORY RESULTS
IEA Project#: 619-127
Client Name: Hoechst Celanese Corporation
Date
Sample I Client ID Parameter Results Analyzed
=---=========================================~-----==============
l u o Tier c Inf Total Organic Carbon 3.8 mg/L 02/16/90
2 i2 I Tier C Inf Total Organic Carbon 1200 mg/L 02/16/90
3 i4 SBR Effluent Total Organic Carbon 110 mg/L 02/16/90
4 ts o Tier T Eff Total Organic Carbon 2.9 mg/L 02/16/90
5 i6 I Tier T Eff Total Organic Carbon 140 mg/L 02/16/90
6 17 Outer Effluent Total Organic carbon 2.7 mg/L 02/16/90
7 ta Inner Effluent Total Organic Carbon 98 mg/L 02/16/90
1 u o Tier c Inf Total Organic Halide 0.027 mg/L 02/13/90
2 12 I Tier C Inf Total Organic Halide 2.1 mg/L 02/14/90
6 i7 Outer Effluent Total organic Halide <0.010 mg/L 02/14/90
7 #8 Inner Effluent Total Organic Halide 0.21 mg/L 02/14/90
Sampling date: 02/08/90
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
JI ~ I ,,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
!
I
I I t1:i
I
I
Sample t
l
2
3
IEA Project #:
Client Name:
Client ID
#1 o. Tier C. Inf.
#5 0. Tier T. Eff.
17 Outer Effluent
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Samples collected on 2/15/90.
IEA LABORATORY RESULTS
619-133
Hoechst Celanese Corporation
Parameter
Total Organic Carbon
Total Organic Carbon
Total Organic Carbon
Results
4.4 mg/L
3.4 mg/L
2.8 mg/L
Date
Analyzed
02/22/90
02/22/90
02/22/90
rn
Sample t
l
2
3
4
IEA Project#:
Client Name:
Client ID
12 I. Tier c. Inf.
#4 SBR Effluent
#6 I. Tier T. Eff.
tB I. Tier Effluent
Sample collected on 02/16/90.
IEA LABORATORY RESULTS
619-134
Hoechst Celanese corporation
Parameter
Total organic Carbon
Total Organic Carbon
Total Organic Carbon
Total Organic Carbon
Results
1,600
100
72
130
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
Date
Analyzed --
02/22/90
02/22/90
02/22/90
02/22/90
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
·I
I
I
I
I
I
I
' I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
IEA Project # :
Client Name:
Sample # Client ID
IEA LABORATORY RESULTS
619137
Hoechst Celanese
Parameter Results
Date
Analyzed
--------------=-----=----=------------=-=-=====-==------=---=-=======•====m=a••••
l u o. Tier c. Inf. Total Organic carbon 6.7 mg/L 02/28/90
2 #2 I. Tier c. Inf. Total Organic Carbon 2300 mg/L 02/28/90
3 i4 S8R Effluent Total Organic Carbon 320 mg/L 02/28/90
4 #5 o. Tier T. Eff. Total Organic carbon 5.7 mg/L 02/28/90
5 #6 I. Tier T. Eff. Total organic Carbon 300 mg/L 02/28/90
6 #7 Outer Effluent Total Organic Carbon 3.0 mg/L 02/28/90
7 #8 Inner Effluent Total Organic Carbon 270 mg/L 02/28/90
Sampling date= 02/22/90
I ~!11
IEA Project#:
Client Name:
Sample# Client ID
IEA LABORATORY RESULTS
619-139
Hoechst Celanese Corporation
Parameter Results
Date
Analyzed
=========================================================================================
1 #1 o Tier c Inf Total Organic Carbon 4.6 mg/L 03/12/90
2 #2 I Tier C Inf Total Organic Carbon 1200 mg/L 03/12/90
3 #4 SBR Effluent Total Organic Carbon 110 mg/L 03/12/90
4 #5 0 Tier T Eff Total organic Carbon 2.9 mg/L 03/12/90
5 #6 I Tier T Eff Total Organic Carbon 110 mg/L 03/12/90
6 #7 Outer Effluent Total Organic Carbon 3.0 mg/L 03/12/90
7 #8 Inner Effluent Total Organic Carbon 120 mg/L 03/12/90
sampling date: 03/01/90
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
IEA LABORATORY RESULTS
IEA Project #: 619-143
Client Name: Hoechst Celenese Corporation
Date
Sample# Client ID Parameter Results Analyzed
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
===========================================================================cz=a======
l u o Tier c Inf
2 12 I Tier C Inf
3 i4 SBR Effluent
4 #5 0 Tier T Eff
5 #6 I Tier T Eff
6 i7 outer Effluent
7 #8 Inner Effluent
l u o Tier c Inf
2 #2 I Tier C Inf
6 i7 Outer Effluent
7 ta Inner Effluent
I Sampling date: 03/08/90
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Total Organic Carbon 3.9 mg/L 03/13/90
. Total organic Carbon 1700 mg/L 03/13/90
Total Organic Carbon 42 mg/L 03/13/90
Total Organic Carbon 2.8 mg/L 03/13/90
Total Organic Carbon 23 mg/L 03/13/90
Total Organic Carbon 2.5 mg/L 03/13/90
Total Organic Carbon 28 mg/L 03/13/90
Total Organic Halide 0.020 mg/L 03/14/90
Total Organic Halide 0.41 mg/L 03/14/90
Total Organic Halide <0.010 mg/L 03/14/90
Total Organic Halide 0.069 mg/L 03/14/90
IEA LABORATORY RESULTS
IEA Project t: 619-144
Client Name: Hoechst Celanese Corporation
Sample t Client ID Parameter
1 u O.T.Comb. Inf. Total Organic Carbon
2 t2 I.T.COmb. Inf. Total Organic Carbon
3 #4 SBR Effluent Total Organic Carbon
4 ts Q.T. Tower Eff. Total Organic Carbon
5 t6 I.T.Tower Eff. Total Organic Carbon
6 t7 outer Effluent Total Organic carbon
7 #8 Inner Effluent Total organic Carbon
Samples collected on 03/15/90.
Results
s.o mg/L
1000 mg/L
33 mg/L
4.0 mg/L
32 mg/L
3.0 mg/L
44 mg/L
Date
Analyzed
04/02/90
04/03/90
04/02/90
04/02/90
04/02/90
04/02/90
03/30/90
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I'
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
am
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Sample t
1
2
3
IEA LABORATORY RESULTS
IEA Project t: 619-146
Client Name: celanese Fibers
Client ID
11 0 Tier C Influent
ts o Tier T Effluent
17 0 Tier Effluent
Parameter
Total Organic Carbon
Total Organic Carbon
Total Organic Carbon
Samples collected on 03/29/90.
Results
4.1 rtJJJ/L
3.6 mg/L
2.7 rtJJJ/L
Date
Analyzed
04/04/90
04/04/90
04/04/90
I t:.?•1
IEA LABORATORY RESULTS
IEA Project t: 619-151
Client Name: Hoechst Celanese Corporation
Date
Sample# Client ID Parameter Results Analyzed
=========================================================a===============================
l u O Tier c Inf Total Organic Carbon 3.9 mg/L 04/16/90
2 #2 I Tier C Inf Total Organic Carbon 960 mg/L 04/16/90
3 #4 SBR Effluent Total Organic Carbon 140 mg/L 04/16/90
4 #5 0 Tier T Eff Total Organic Carbon 3.l mg/L 04/16/90
5 -. #6 I Tier T Eff Total Organic Carbon 160 mg/L 04/16/90
6 n 0 Tier Eff Total Organic Carbon 2.8 mg/L 04/16/90
7 18 I Tier Eff Total organic carbon 280 mg/L 04/16/90
l u 0 Tier C Inf Total Organic Halide 0.034 mg/L 04/10/90
2 #2 I Tier C Inf Total Organic Halide 0.19 mg/L 04/10/90
6 #7 0 Tier Eff Total Organic Halide 0.013 mg/L 04/12/90
7 #8 I Tier Eff Total organic Halide 0.28 mg/L 04/12/90
Sampling date: 04/05/90
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
IEA LABORATORY RESULTS
IEA Project t: 619-152
Client Name: Hoechst Celanese Corporation
Date
Sample # Client ID Parameter Results Analyzed
---------------==-=-----=--==--==-===-=--======-=-------==-====---=========--=---------==-
l il Outer Tier Comb. Inf. Total Organic Carbon 7.3 mg/L 04/23/90
2 #2 Inner Tier Comb. Inf. Total Organic Carbon l,500 mg/L 04/23/90
3 #4 SBR Effluent Total Organic Carbon 140 mg/L 04/24/90
4 ts Outer Tier Tow. Eff. Total Organic Carbon 9.6 mg/L 04/24/90
5 16 Inner Tier Tow. Eff. Total Organic Carbon 160 mg/L 04/24/90
6 #7 Outer Effluent Total organic Carbon 10 mg/L 04/24/90
7 #8 Inner Effluent Total Organic Carbon 160 mg/L 04/24/90
Sampling date: 04/12/90
:: ' I I I
IEA LABORATORY RESULTS
IEA Project#: 619-153
Client Name: Hoechst Celanese Corporation
Sample t Client ID Parameter Results
l u outer Tier comb. Inf. Total Organic Carbon 5.5 mg/L
2 #2 Inner Tier Comb. Inf. Total Organic Carbon 1,000 mg/L
3 #4 SBR Effluent Total Organic Carbon 72 mg/L
4 ts outer Tier Tow. Eff. Total organic Carbon 14 mg/L
5 #6 Inner Tier Tow. Eff. Total Organic Carbon 100 mg/L
6 #7 Outer Tier Effluent Total Organic Carbon 11 mg/L
7 ta Inner Tier Effluent Total Organic carbon 58 mg/L
Sampling date: 04/19/90
Date
Analyzed
04/24/90
04/24/90
04/24/90
04/24/90
04/24/90
04/24/90
04/24/90
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
HCCFORM • L
[NNER TIER COMBINED INFLUENT
MONfH ,:r:1, ,R ~
I COND. PH COD BOD I TSS NH::N F'04 TDC RAIN
DAY l/MO. OAlL'i TOTAL l/MQNTH IOAIL'-( 1/WEEK 1/WEEK 1/WEEI< FALL
1st.WED. DAILY 1st.WED. WED. WED. THUR. IN/DAY
i l ! Is: z~ t:SO ,, I I ' " I . i S.11 .si:zsl .:20 I • J ()
!
-I
-I Is:,, ls,111 ,~ I I I , lo I
I
" I s:,, ,~,s1 ,~ •Ii) I
,; I s:,, 11;.o '-I ll I
0 I S'.S1 /()~~ ,r . /{) !
7 J73q f;l,o ~x~J'°i'3 /t.1. 1,.tD ,, I ] I 0 I '
8 S:S'o '-l,r ,, C
I
0 ""' '
_, • 9c
l l"J I ; . .. I I ,7o I
I
I
11 I " ,, I t)
I 1: I ,, •• I 0
l ?-I, ., I t)
14 ,, ., 0
15 " ,, .So
16 l~:J I ?f:'7G ;i.o 17 UL 0.1, 171/,7 ~-,~ •
17 s:s-, 11,~o IL 0
lB S'.S'J ?!oo :l 5' 1.2
19 I s:y, ~700 J,. I 0
I
:() S'.r3 ,,oo ¥1 () I
:1 '(J<l G,Joo 2., 9.oo ()J11 • 3
--I S:(o r:,,r--,~ I , ~ --' .. ! 110 e 1-::J./t-O 0 -. I
I I
. I :-i " .. ~
:s ,. i l'I I " I :.:6 I,, (J IJ. """' I '1 ' I I ~ I
! .. , I Lr,; !'?;o I/~ I I I ()
!1 :'l I f.r t.3 !1,S'o" i ! ti~ i t,t_ llO \ I ) g I 0
:' I
I
ii -1 I I I ! I I I I
I I I
I I I I I
! LOW 1173'1
I
II HIGH I 17J~
DAY
l
--
i -
I 4
5
6
7
8
Q
1 ()
11
1.::
!
1-•.
14
15
16
17
18
lQ
:::1)
I :1
I ----
--
:4
=5
:,
:7
:s
.-
-.
. ~
AVG.
LOW
HIGH
pH
'
I
'
I
: I
.
?.(} Z-
?-1-Z
L."ia
?. 'l 1
?.~
?.t.i
,.').S
7.?L
I ?.it
I 1. 1, ·
1. 3 z....
xxxxxxx
,. 9/J
7.at.
INNER TIER EOUAl..lZATION 1'"Al"Jt
HCCFORM • 1:
MONTH~"~.~
I
I
I
I
•
:
'
' '
i
I
I
I I ·'
II
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
'
I
I
I i
'
I
,1iFTER PLATE SEFr.F..~TOF.. E-EFOF-E S[•h
~acP No. <1
I TOC I FH
COD BOD TSS
DM I 1 /WEEf DAll.Y TOTAL l /MON rf-1 DAILY
rHuF... DAILY 1st. i,iJ(:.Ll.
'
1 ! I I
-I -
-I
I
•
5
"
7
8
9
10
11 I
1::
1~ I I
14 I
15
16 ,.1, 'l'o ;1.2,
17 I _,i;:, '7 nco z.c..
18 7.11 _(o o,o I (.
19 I "''' I~ <Loo "I '
I :,) 1-, A 1 3/fM .'.:I 0 I
:1 r ~:, S'~oo .;1.3 --I ,.,, '"°o ~I ~-
--Alo cc. ,_ I --·
:4 ~ r_ I '4.
:5 I NO I .. -,
:o ,z1 c:Too / l.
--7..(o ,ooo ,r-
:a 1.z8 I,~ '7D
I
--
AVG. xxxxx k'/Jr'-1 ~s
LOW . LI. ';ti}~/) ' } ?---
HIGH '). C: LISo ?o
HCCFOFd"I • 1: ...... 5 ...... e=I,"'--. _ ,~ ~
NH3N F·Q4
l/WEEK 1/WEE~
WED. WED,
I
pH MLSS
DAY DAILY DAILY
1 i.1;, l1u0
-f.~, ,.,. .. ,.,
1 ![, '"' ,-1,~
4 x f.l. ,, .. '
5 tr. l7 °A/1/o
6 ~.,, :l?ou
7 t.3? ?oeo
8 r.,. ,.,,,
9 f,?/ I, c--oa
1 (l i.1'1 Jt'.2.o
11 Q Ct; 1,A_,.
1::: qov u-,.,2.0 -.. 1 ~ 9. oi 15'/). --14 K.91.f 'JJoo
15 9.ao 3•1#
16 9.ol JX,
17 i.n 3.2.?0
18 z.n 31,u
19 8,fo J1,v
::1:> 9, ?9 l.!>t::c,i
:1 'l.17 ,.., .. oo
--Y,1, :l9,o --
! --l ~ 111 3JJ.&,
;
I :4 f?. ,, :i>1t.o I
I :::-K' f I 1'11,o, ,_
:=:; ~.ff J.2.ro
:, '?.ft l"'lo i'b
SE,/; NIXED l.lOUOR
MLVSS AMMONJA o.o.
1/WEEt iJ l TF\UGEtJ DAILY
l-'IEU. or"' !L ( -·
/(), JD $'.1.f
~~So r: q
;q,., I.I 9 -
/</,Jo .S:I'
-, 2 .z.o s:a
q /0 ,.,
'.l 21,0 1' 10 s: 0
J/. 2. r. 0
~8'.9 "'-~ ·-
~1.0 '·" I?. r,. "].If
1f1 r s:r
'IL, 't. ,.1
'-t.&10._ -~ _ _? __ ,. 0
l'i, o ,.,
12. J ,.,
'2.1, '1 V.f
1t.2 r.v
I :zs:' L'i
I
I~• ""-' ,_,~o /,. ?O "" 'Jt , ,. t
!Z.o. 'i r: '1
°?I oo V,•
,:2o, oo ~--~
'-'· 0 0 r-.t
-. ----_/_1.L/_ __ ,_'f..S:..
OUARTS
NITF-.OGEN
• ADDED
'I-
0 z.
I.I,
J
" I.{.
0
c::,
3
S'
0
0
'f
1
0
0
t.f
;2.
'I-
LI-
t)
2
0
I
~
-i
I
M □NTH Fe6 fS.-2£ I
SETTLED
SOL! DS
a DA IL f
'f.oo
'"2 t"' 0
., .., r-., ,c--
U.oo
eD o
UQ$'
If S'-:>
lf5o
' I
I
!
i I I I
I I
I
I I !
!
I
i ;
I I
I
·•.,11 .. ,-
-sc,;u,I • .. ~...-.. .&'1 .....
i
I I
I
I
I
!
I
,~ .. ' i...;•e u•2 ..., S,
I
I
I
I j
I'
,-
i! =a I ?. 7, / :U'i J ~ 't'.D o~...!.l_,'f_.._. O~..;.! ...!.7.L!. S'~___,,_,t.:,___,_.....!.'1-....:!2.:=..:0=----,---___;.--
" ---I I I I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I 'I I I ! ; I :;..-,-I I I . ·-' I
I ~ I I
' i "xx xx ·-~~(.J ::; 3 t/0 :z~. ,i,t_i r. ,1 ~-J ~ 'f'-I. t I II AVG.
' I LOW '6,31 ".70D ~JU) 9./~ 13. !i' 0 3S"o I
I 9, t; 1 lf J;..O '-t/'lO i 't 3. 5 i i,O I J, ! S'oo I i HIGH I I . -. -.....:.----,--· ----,.-=I .. ---.--=·-.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Fage No. ~
i/ DAY I COD DAI~ Y
'
l I S.S-a
-! t. ,s--
-j ?tJO
I " ,yo I' ! :; ?fl~ I
i 6 ?ra
7 t.2;
8 900
9 /0?0
1() A/t:J
11 ,-JO
1: qr~
1-/JO
14 ~o
1:;
"' 0
16 ,,o
17 9()0
18 /fJOO
19 ?-'c
.:i:J J:,o o
:1 11.20 --Ii U.o -~
---, 100
:: . Q~o
: 5 QDO
:o t./,.2.o
;::7 S'oo
:a SI~
AVG. J(.f.
LOW 31.o
HIGH 'd--1 /11)
HCCFGF-.M • L
MONTH r~lo YR,--.£!
-
E<OD TOC.:
l I WE Et 1 / WEEI
WED. THUR. ---. --
I
I?~
cs-2 1.21. o
'-19 '
.7.9/. 8
I*
!:!.,.I.LJ
/')./, 0
~/.3
F·..,ae No. -
CONO,
CAY l/MONTM
1st.WED.
l I --
-.
4
5
6
7 /rto~
8
9
10
11
1:
13
14
15
16
17
18
19 I
:i) I
:1 --~~
:-:.
=•
:5
:6
:7
:a
.
AVG, I 80 r;
L.□W
HlGl-4
INNER rtER CAR~ON FILTER EFFLU~NT
PH coo 800 rss NH!-N
l/l,,,U'.. 1 /Wt-, l /Wt:. l/MONTH 1/MONTH
WED, WEO, WED. lST,WEO, l ST, WEO,
t.J'f '7$'0 :2~.S' ~ 1/-o 3 O.Jd
1. ''f ll,o ,:~b
E.11~ /Ofo 1 C'.JJ '
8,/~ 5~() I""
XX XX X: g,,.,.,., ~'-10 3o,<o
?.!.JJ ?;170
E.19 )o~o
HCCFORM • • ... .._
MONTH Feb YR 9°
P04 TDC
1/MONTH l /Wt(,
!ST.WED. T1-4UR.
~-6'1
91.~,
~'l'J. 0
'
i
~.n't I 93, t
7 JB.,J
"J.'ft,p ' / '
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I INNER TtEh COMBINED INFLUENT
HCCFOR,-, • .
MON TM ~ YR .:2'.:i-
I I CONO. PH coo 800 TSS NH:.N F'04 TOC RAIN
DAY 1/MO. DAILY TOTAL l/MONTH DAILY l /WEEK 1/WEEK 1/WEEK FALL
ilst.WEO. DAILY 1st.WED. WED. WED. THUR. IN/OAY
I
I 1 I t-',J,..rJ ,,.,,_
(J 2. //()'1 (). ,() ,,.
I I ',1~ •. JI I,,() -<"l.l -
I
-$'.11 L~o /4 o, I .
• 15, ,, t.JrZa Ir) (), ()
I
5 S':' C
-7 e),O
/ A-, J
6 _ t:;,f(/.. }pJM. )d.. () ,,(J
I
7 9t,~ <'.'""),, ~JJd I ?tio 2:1. 112,1.~ iL, :12_ "·'° -5',(.t.f '1,.3~ /~ 8 Jc.-:v /J, A,:-
9 L--r: r,~ ,~ c;,. ;r (J. d
I 10 lEt. l I 1.2M IA "·" 11 l( I,. A I 11:' .:3 ~ )2-~-0
I 1: ':::" -::::1. I 11.b.., }.:,-0,0
S', st~ . J..S 13 3,50 I) ,()
I -~ 14 <.?9 ;:1_/4 JL 4,d,, r,, IA J. o9/L 6. 11
15 _.,_,) ~6(1 ~z.. I d. A ' ~
I 16 1:;-' t"'-J -?_"!, " J' .0:,
17 >, s'I J/-~O /S/ ). J
I
18 _s; S" i' l;Z 00 ;o lJ' J
19 _\.Q'9 -?0Al\ l~c::-(J. )
I
:o t::') 9 I~ J-u i (), ()
I 'd 5'. () tt!, 0 I :1 5,1'1 ~)10 l,/2..
I
--5.31 "/MD JI J~,.,q b,O --
--;.i'f },Xl> )/ ~,(! --
I
=• ic;':J;.. LfJ& ) ti A.a
li:;,3,;
. 7
:s dr.. • )A l),o
n
:6 r.~ 9750 ~ A,"'2--
I :, F,31.-~1ra /CJ ~. 1)
:s N, .fa .,., 1-,/4. o,J.j
I », C":-" I /V• s. tJ,3 :9 , ..... )A
30 Iii. ..n :... •I~ tJ,?
I .. No s· ,, i 0,1) _. •
AVG. q~3 X. XX.XX l~l!, I,") C: 0 I 1 q ,s., 7 "l • 03 I [Cf (),I'!
I LOW ~lt'J r!lLLn ~~ {)S,O o,..( J.J ~rr. '{, tJ,O
HIGH c;-, 9~ 'f')r::r, I Zd 3,., r., -,; -:,.:_ I c:-1 ~ I ..3
DAY
I
--
-
.,
5
"
7
8
"
11)
11
1:
I
1-
1•
15
16
: 7
18
'
l '>
:1)
:1
--' --I ---,
=•
-· --
:o
:7
:s
:<>
~t)
31
AVG.
LOW
HIGH
pH
I '7. IL : / / 7
! 7,2-CJ
[7,62--
/'J.>s'
7, )~ ..
"1, J"_1
1, ;,£
1, t./1.
·11J/..f
75"'7
1_, I. II-
7,r/'6
17,Z.9
7, I,, I.
7~/
1.do
7.J~
1,~ D
17.J~
7,3L
11.33
lt.,1
7, t/ l-
7, I. I
11,dl .
2., <t'l..
7, O'Z--
I '7.:-;1.
7,_J_i_
7,il
7. (./
XXXXXI.X
t.11
?, 7o
INNER TIER EOUALIZ/:4TION ri::.ra
r-,QNTH
HCCFC~M • 1:~
'1k,/ -~.2a_
'
I ' i
I:
I: ,.
' fl
' ' I
I I
' I I
'
I
!I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
(
S&R MIXED LIQUOR
i: .ige No. 6
oH MLSS MLVSS iQMMONIA D.O.
DAY DAILY DAILY ll"'EEJ: ll I TROGE!•· DAILY
"'ED. DAIL I
l f.77. tJ..21~ ).i, '7 t1 t:::", q
-f.sY ,32/..1 / J. ,,,. r:::-.9 -
C !f,1> JI t,'f JI,~ $'. 'f .
4 ir.9o JL~C 12., <L t.f
5 1. 7 1 ,·n )/' ,1 I. . /
6 9,6.1 1-4 ,;' &\'7. //.., I. l _ ,A
7 ci. J,i, 1111 A 2.~f'",_ )t, , '7 /,. ' 7.,
' -' ~
(,,0 8 9, 08 318'1' ft; ,0
9
'' 6:;
:'31 i.6 ;~. 1 6, ,_
1 (I q, oL '?l?A ) /. t}.,( -7,L
11 '1,t..? ':1,)/4& Jg,/ -6':2-
1: q All I"'-/4-? )t.._ d =-.Ji
l :. e. erz. 1.z.t?-z. It, e. ,
S, 'I
14 q ,/\ / .2.7/Afi 1Llb. //.... S' s1
15 If, 9()/ ,:7)/,Jo.. )),< 6. /
16 .f, 17 L?2~? )..2, ..2... 1"1~9
17 8.8~ ~"So Jt,i t,. d
18 $. i I J;.# I 2-~ I,. I
19 11', q) 11:2.ftl )), ) L, I
I =<) ,f,q~ 1~~~6 9.,'1 t,, C
:1 f-'1~ 3~ z.7tt-o I 2.. I (,. I -->1.1, 311'2-/ ~-(. ~-D --
--$,7(,,, JZ.,,f /j,5 /,,,_ -,
=• %,?/, ?~LA. ,f, '2 7, 2..
:s 3,71!, -:J.?¼ JI,~ r:;~~
:6 i.~ 12-Vo //, ~ (,,C I :1 g, I,!, ~lf(JO I z... 'I s.1 ·-·----·· -·· ...
:LI 9. k, tJ,, A 2.L In. )/,S-.~9
I
If, I.-°' 4/.7._11. ' ~., II :9
', 4 11 31) 1/,b!L-' IJ.'11. R' :? • 1 I.a;-. 4
I :.
.
8,VO J~L'f I 7, 2-.s:i
II ,>vG. xxxxxx 13st I 1~13 I !l. • I /_ .
II LO"' 9.,t;J 1~1£ 'J£S:;.. 3,9 b. '.l..-,,
ii ~IGH I 'f.,, Z IJ.f.?.3. i<"Jh'fJ I 9, I I) I /,,
~CFO~M I 1:
MONTH ...,_,_."'-"4,._ y R.. ~
OUARTS SETTLED
NITROGEN SOLIDS
t ADDEO I DAILY
.
I
i
--·
ii
DAY
I
--
_,
•
5
6
7
8
9
le)
11
1:
1-_,
14
15
16
I 7
18
19
:i:i
" :1 i ---~
--
:4
: 5
:1,
'~7
:a
:9
( I :.o
7-1
AVG.
LOW
HIGH
coo 800
DAILY l /WEE•.
WED.
--
I Slti
I ,l::;--t; I
I 3~D
4-SO
d); tJ
Jj. iki
,_ °5 x~ ~D,O
3 70
?J di..
~btJ
;/.ti lJ
2.'76
2-95
216 ~').J?
~4£<1
2?'&
;;~
38?
li)'I:,
3L~
; ,I.-; j J..lj.~
'I-~ 6
L/'-/-0
~/0
7 £1,e.
f:f?o
/}~
11/6 .' "~i'l 11
IV' 6 Lr.t2, ,n
7¥4
~80
J../3C-/ J../5.l
~Jo ~.r),J
131/4! /,r, I T)
-TDC
I /WEE>
THUR,
~-t.
J./i.~
;'11,t
/1..7 <:: ,-
I 'P_
'#Q N,$,
1,-Z,8.1
t'JJI~. ~
3~.(;;
-
HCCFO~M I 1
MONTH~d vR,-7'a.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
'
OAY
l
--
-. .
4
5
"
7
8
9
1,)
11
1:
1-
14
15
16
17
18
19
=o
-. -·
z::
_,
=•
:5
:6
:7
:a
:9
3(1
31
A\.'G,
LOW
HIGH
CONO.
1/MONTM
1st.WED.
I
/Ofj .
I
I
I
ln~J
HCCFORM • 1:,
INNER TIER CAF.;80N FIL re.R EFFLUf.:::N r
MQN TM ~ '( ~ ;.~,.._A _
PH coo EcrJO rss NH~N P04 roe
l /WI'.. l /W•-.• l /Wt:. l/MQNTH !/MONTH l/MONTH 1/WK.
WED. WEO. WED. 1ST ,WED. 1 Sr. WED. !ST.WED. THUR,
I IS..3
1, 73 ,l_7L'"1'. 3/t/ JJ.2 ~ U.'7 2. ?_~
--, ?S"Jo
if /J) ?6,A qd-9
8'f.i9
f/,51 JJ.50 i l:',? I
) fl, l/-
!
I
.
No J',:. IM _,,,)p • -(I "· s. I
i
' r
xxxxx 1853 t./'tl L/~ 'J, J/ 'l ~ .. ~ c:-lo8.0 I
fJ. '73 ?✓-:o l~o ')~ ZI. i I
SI. c;,; J./?5{) Cf 'J-'7 I<"?,,, I
i -
'
:\ : ::.ri~·-: F'H I coo I E<OD 11ss :w-r:--N IF'04 roe R,:irN l ,
:1 :-..:., , :.. ""'C:-::1AIL'r'ITOT.:::.L[1,r-tQN~1; ,D,:i!LY(l,/W~EK l/WEEk 1/WEEk' FALL I j
j . :.;-:.-c.;.., DAILrl1,t.WE:::i..,. ! ~Eu. WED. THUR. IN/OAYj .i
Sa='====~·=~-.. '=~=-=·~_,.,.•==--·------~----~-!
NO iS,._~~ I I j 0,0 1
I
I
I
,::-i _-___ __._::I~..:..:' 'f'--0+;..,~ 3'--15:::...;l~ _ _.,_,_:.~_.._I --+---'-----,~--,~":::...;'.::..0---i-----~I I
1.,: ,to Jdqo ! I / .5 I " , o I l
11 --: ,:--,,L l"3&66 I}~ ,.,, n I
' : • I I S: 5 z.zao I ~ .3 n, V
!::;: /.. ,ZJ~I \) -2.... S: "I, • J2' 0, 6. I
..-c-f~?.c.< ! 2... ~ 7 9(.1 Cl "
. . I s., .70<111 r 13 .... , 11 I
, rf. 'i \Joo6 ! D~ ! ), .1s-~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
i '7. 1,1./-i ,;
0
7
9
0
l <:1
i
!I
11
,,
1:
14
15
lo
1a
19
!I :1)
"
I :1
I
' . .,
' --' ' --! -" I
i :>
.
"----" ! ---.
' I :s I ,,
:a
:.o
31
~VG. ,1
: LUW
HIGH
7.f/:
'7.33:
! 1. f3 I
i 1.¥0 I
7./ I
'7 .5
i 7, 2
i ., • J I
I
'7.5' I
' 7, ---' ' < A'I '
: 7, '2-i I
11-3 I
i
i 1. 7 I
7, s
A ..l..
I
:( X X X X X X I
,0
MONTH
II ! CCC : ,~ r COD 1' BOD rss I CJH"'.N I F04 ' 'I
-~ C,A-t' : ..;f~i :: . ..:.:L" TOTAL l/MmHH DAILY I ~:wEEr', l/\.iJEEt 11 'l
!I I r~◄uf;. ! !oAILtllst . ..JE.lJ. ! ~EO. ! :...Eo.· ! ;j
;·,~"'" =_:_=_ =_ =J_
1 ==N~~,,==; .5~~~;~-~-JI =====t::::::, ====]=====1===~/======JJ
j -! : (,,2.-'f 'If~ (;5
ij !O
I
11
' \
:~1
.:...= -l...:1~"'....:1'.1,;-~1,6 , c~ii!t. ,,~,,,,.L------l-...f~~i~--!----L----+l _---1I __ ____Ji1
I t--i iit~! 011.-I I I I 1 :.
I
14
I 1,
16
I ' -. I -, "I? ,.. • ; Ci
I :• !
i :5 I ,I I
:s
11,J JUo 7
1,v 3/dO J7
I I I
I
"
n,t? . 1d
i AVG. If) s 'J-" X " /./.7./.3 c; 1,./ ! '7 ! I I J./. ').. 't t). 4 ').
'
HIGH
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
59R MIXED L10UOR
i OH MLSS MLVSS CMNONIA 0.0.
si:.' : ~c.. r Li ;;AIL·f l / WEEI: rJ!Tf:;OGC::N OA!L'(
WED. DA IL (
I . '1~1 r -ud. ! /9,o £,9 i I
:, . '9,p£ i ¼I/J '9-/, p 'l,J I ' :L--_
!I . ! J_,'j/ l 37i'f' W,q ?,2-' ;
I
.; : a. '71 I :3n.,,,-'J.F'2. ~.1) ! q,?
5 !J.9r; ~.,, I 2," 5",Jf "
" j,jJ 33~ I lb,~ I s.t I
7 3,76 3t/3() /~, '! 6,/
a ! J, 'Ji, I 3~"J-/,. r; S-;tj
• J,'77 I 3/lo Jt.s t,t
l 1:1 '7./o ~3 t,; t.?
I ,,~ JMZ ~(., ~-// t,J "
. -J 9.z, ~,41 I/. ; ~ I t,3
. •' 3,Jo -~~o Jb,<j I t,t
14 s.,~ 13~~ 17,S ! t.J
15 "j, t?t> 3~ /£'.')... ! ~3 I
16 ),?() 33!~ s.s £:JI
17 J.3() 3o/'l.f> ?,s 1/·S
18 ;,3.,, :?S-Jlo ~~ 1~.s ~'}
1• '/,'lo 3/~ C,c; t-~
:,:i 3,7o .-n12-$,7 S,'J
:1 ! g,J9 u,,, 7,i 4,/ I ' "Mio '1,t ·-l 3. 1(J £',7 --
-. i j,Jo "3'7:0 it 5",'J -.
:<l 13,"Jo U<Jt t, C: ~!3
-s i J,'7(; , 33~ ~,p ~.1 7.t
i :a i x', J b / 3-,tc, r,• 7 : t,i
11 I, -,, !J,1/2 i3~ J;J ij.~
I~" ~i, I ,,., / , s:; 5,S
I ----f q,t I :9 ! jh IJ~b 5".? i
, :,, I i,L.. 13~ <;;, 1) /4,f
I -I I .. I
' AVG. j n xx xx '3§"/? J.G~s I . c: l.'l-I I L•Jw tt.tlo 3/k ').~ ,.~ . J../,, c; ,,
i! ~~-lGH ! 1, 'H, i~S ~l) m~ 'J..J,o i ?.t
HCCFORM I 1:~
MONTH ~ YF(. 24
!JU~F•:TS SETTLED '
NITROGEN SOLIDS
• ADDED I oi::::.tLY
!
I
i I I ' '
! I
i
I
I ' '
I
I I ' i I
I I I
I I
I i
' I I ' ' ' ' !
!
'
i ' ' ,,
!1
I I
i
I
---·-·
I
I I
·1 ..
I-:1 J -
I e
I I 7
I
I 8 '
I ~
I 1 l_l
I I 1 l .
i 1:
I 1:
1•
15
16
17
1a
i 19
' I
I .:,:i
I
j I :1
I
I ----
I -_,
I =· I
I ::,
: "
~7
I :a
I' ='-'
:o
:1
>-<VG.
LOW
HIGH
~c::FCF-.M • 1.::-
MONT>-'~ YR, z,,
I
I
I i
i
~+-+-------~-· I
?6A ' I
' ' ' '
t'?c: I J~,.._ ! 15"1~
2Jc; / I ' ~t-e, ' I I I
'1£11 I I
I I
-~H I
~ I I I
~le i
t~ :;~~ 13!,?
1/'~I
J./~,, I
t/lo
3~o
31lc
)9C ~.?
I 3/~ ??,?? I
i 3HJ I
I ~t>
I 3~
' i 3f{,
! :?t/o
35"o 33._3
Jtc: /.,j, 1
3~
! 3?o I I
I/lo
t11~
I I I '
J./'1CJ / L/~. ) 117. -z
J~S ~.? ?'}, ??
</60 ~l~ )<;/.. q
I
'
,i
.,
,:
"
:
I
1:
" !!
' " ' '
I:
I· r '
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
i I OM
I
I I ;
--
·'
I 4
5
6
7
13
9
1 r)
11
1=
. 1 :.
14
15
16
17
18
19
:(,
:: 1
--
=,
=•
=~
:6
:7
28
29
?-0
31
nVtl.
LOW
HIGH
INNER TIER STRIFFER TOWER EFFLUENr
MONIH
I HC leA
rue TfJC
;:'Ll1TI ppm
i I
I i
'
I I
It d-~
l~'f.2..
.
//2..,'f
/11.>. 2---j
)~ '.l.
Io 9. ')__
'~.c:
! I
7
I I
I I
I 11 1
I 19 I
' .: 1 i
I I
I :: I
:: I
:7 i
I
I :s !
:;(I
';.L.
E<IJD
1 ,' :. .. ,W •
W(D.
I Im
I I
. I
'
HCCFOF..M • :.:~
MONT~~ YR <-';,,3'.__
i f'35 i rJH:".N I' FQ4
1 1:MOrJfH 11.·M □NTM 1/MONTH
l,·3r.~ED. l1cr.wEo. 1ST.~ED.
i !
I
!
!
I
TDC I
1/Wtc. II
THUR.
I I
I I
I '73,'/
?/. 6
i'
I I
II I !
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-~1 ~
sample t
IEA Projact I:
Client Name:
Client ID
IEA LABORATORY Rll:SOL'l'S
830-004
Celanese Fibers
Date
Parameter Ragulta Analyzed
===ce=ceccccc===========~~~~a•••••=m=========e.==========~========amm•aaa•••••••~=========•
1 Extraction Well t3
2 Extraction Well u
l Extraction Well t3
2 llixtraction Well u
1 Extraction Well f3
2 Extraction Well u
1 Extraction well 13
2 Extraction Well fl
l llxtraction Well t3
2 Extraction Well u
l Extraction Well t3
2 Extraction Well fl
l Extraction Well t3
2 Extraction Well t1
MAY-25-90 FRI l 4 : 3 7
Biochemical oxygen Demand 560
Biochemical oxygen Demand 30,000
Chemical Oxygen Demand 860
Chamical Oxygen Demand 48,000
Ammonia-N 1.3
Ammonia-N <0.1
Total organic Carbon 290
Total Organic Carbon 14,000
Tamperature 16.l
Temperature 16.2
pH 5,90
pH 5.19
Conductivity 845
Conductivity 3,430
9196770427
mg/L 02/28/90
mg/L 02/28/90
mg/L 03/01/90
mg/L 03/01/90
mg/L 03/01/90
mg/L 03/01/90
·mg/L 03/01/90
mg/L 03/01/90
C 02/26/90
C 02/26/90
02/26/90
02/26/90
uhmos/cm 02/26/90
uhmoa/cm 02/26/90
TOTAL " •·
p . " 7
rn
IEA Project t:
Client Name:
Sample t Client ID
l Extraction Well tl
Il!!A LABORATORY RESULTS
830-004(0)
Celanese Fibers
Parameter
Ethylene Glycol
Results
26,000 .mg/L
Date
Analyzed
03/14/90
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
GC/HS PURGKABLES
SW-846 METHOD 8240
IEA Sample Number:
Sample Identification:
830-004(0)-1
Extraction Well tl
Date Analyzed: 03/12/90 By: Young
Number Compound
l Acetone
2
3
4
Benzene
Bromodichloromethane
Bromoform
5 Bromomethane
6
7
2-Butanone
Carbon disulfide
8 Carbon tetrachloride
9
10
11
12
13
14
Chlorobenzene
Dibromochloromethane
Chloroethane
2-Chloroethylvinyl ether
Chloroform
Chloromethane
15 1,1-Dichloroethane
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
Comments:
1,2-Dichloroethane
1,1-Dichloroethene
1,2-Dichloroethene (total)
1,2-Dichloropropane
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
Ethylbenzene
2-HEtxanone
Methylene chloride
4-Methyl-2-pentanone
Styrene
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
Tetrachloroethene
Toluene
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
1,1,2-Trichloroethana
Trichloroethane
Vinyl acetate
Vinyl chloride
Xylenes (total)
BQL Below Quantitation Limit
Quantitation
Limit
(ug/L)
100
5
5
5
10
100
5
5
5
5
10
10
5
10
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
so
5
so
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
50
10
5
Results
Concentration
(ug/L)
BQL
5
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
rn
BASE/NEUTRAL/ACID EXTRACTABLES
SW-846 METHOD 8270
IEA Sample Number: 830-004(0)-1
Extraction Well tl
03/14/90
Sample Identification:
Date Extracted:
Date Analyzed: 03/16/90
Number
l
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
Compound
Acenaphthene
Acenaphthylene
Anthracene
Benzoic acid
Benzo(a)anthracene
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene
Benzo(a)pyrene
Benzyl alcohol
bia(2-Chloroethoxy)methane
bia(2-Chloroethyl)ether
bia(2-Chloroiaopropyl)ether
bia(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate
4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether
Benzyl butyl phthalate
4-Chloroaniline
2-Chloronaphthalene
4-Chloro-3-methylphenol
2-Chlorophenol
4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether
Chryaene
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
Dibenzofuran
Di-n-butylphthalate
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine
2,4-Dichlorophenol
Diethyl phthalate
2,4-Dimethylphenol
Dimethyl phthalate
4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol
2,4-Dinitrophenol
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
2,6-0initrotoluene
Di-n-octylphthalate
Fluoranthene-
FORM 8270 (1) Rev. 050589
By: O'Toole
Quantitation
Limit
(ug/L)
10
10
10
50
10
10
10
10
10
20
10
10
10
10
10
10
20
10
20
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
20
10
10
10
10
so
50
10
10
10
10
Results
concentration
(ug/L)
BQL
BQL
BQL
170
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
32
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
IEA Sample Number:
BASE/lll!OTRAL/ACID EXTRACTABLBS
SW-846 METHOD 8270
Sample Identification:
830-004(0)-1
Extraction Well tl
03/14/90 Date Extracted:
Date Analyzed: 03/16/90 By: O'Toole
Quantitation
Limit
Number compound (ug/L)
40 ?luorene 10
41 Hexachlorobenzene 10
42 Hexachlorobutadiene 10
43 Hexachlorocyclopentadiene 10
44 Hexachloroethane 10
45 Indeno(l,2,3-cd)pyrene 10
46 Isophorone 10
47 2-Methylnaphthalene 10
48 2-Methylphenol (o-cresol) 10
49 4-Methylphenol (p-cresol) 10
so Naphthalene 10
51 2-Nitroaniline so
52 3-Nitroaniline so
53 4-Nitroaniline so
54 Nitrobenzene 10
55 2-Nitrophenol 10
56 4-Nitrophenol so
57 N-Nitroso-di-n-propylamine 10
58 N-Nitrosodiphenylamine 10
59 Pentachlorophenol so
60 Phenanthrene 10
61 Phenol 10
62 Pyrene 10
63 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 10
64 2,4,5-Trichlorophenol 10
65 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol 10
Comments:
BQL = Below Quantitation Limit
FORM 8270 (2) Rev. 050589
Results
Concentration
(ug/L)
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
rn
Sample t
l
l
l
l
IEA Project t:
Client Name:
Client ID
Inner Tier Ext.a
Inner Tier Ext.a
Inner Tier Ext.a
Inner Tier Ext.a
IEA LABORATORY RESULTS
830-005
Hoechst Celanese Corporation
Parameter
Biochemical Oxygen Demand
Chemical Oxygen Demand
Ammonia-N
Total Organic Carbon
Samples collected on 3/15/90.
Results
1900
3800
<0.10
1200
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
Date
Analyzed
03/16/90
03/23/90
03/27/90
04/03/90
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I APPENDIX II
DAVIS & FLOYD, INC. DATA
I
I
I
I
I
/
,,/
/
I / ·-.
I
I
I 5050H190
I
-- ---- - - - - -- -- - - - --D a V i s & F 1 o y d , I n c • Laboratory Analysis Report
Page 2 Work Order # 90-02-061
Received: 02/13/90 03/20/90 09:19:50
01 02
Test Description Units 001 DISCHARGE TRIP BLANK
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CHROMIUM (TOTAL) mg/1 0.01
COPPER (TOTAL) mg/1 <0.02
NICKEL (TOTAL) mg/1 <0.04
ZINC (TOTAL) mg/1 0.06
LEAD (TOTAL) mg/1 <0.005
TRICHLOROETHYLENE ug/1 <5 <5
CYAIHDE (TOTAL) mg/1 0.017
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
D a Vi S F l o y d , I n c • Laboratory Analysis Report
Page 3 Work Order# 90-02-061
Received: 02/13/90 Results by Sample
SAMPLE ID 001 DISCHARGE FRACTION 01A TEST CODE EPA625 NAME SEMIVOLATILES METHOD 625
Date & Time Collected 02/13/90 10:05:00 Category
AIIALY ST --~J~P~C AJIALYZED 03/13/90 FACTOR ___ _.,_2 UN I TS __ _,,u_,.q,_/-"1 VERIFIED J1frl
COMPOUND RESULT DET LIMIT COMPOUND RESULT DET LIMIT
N-Nitrosodimethylamine BDL 10 2,6-Dinitrotoluene BDL 10
Phenol BDL 10 Diethylphthalate BDL 10
bis(2-Chloroethyl)ether BDL 10 4-Chlorophenyl-phenylether BDL 10
2-Chlorophenol BDL 10 Fluorene BDL 10
1,3-Dichlorobenzene BDL 10 4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol BDL so
1,4-Dichlorobenzene BDL 10 U-Nitrosodiphenylarnine BDL 10
1,2-Dichlorobenzene BDL 10 4-Bromophenyl-phenylether BDL 10
bis(2-Chloroisopropyl)ether BDL 10 Hexachlorobenzene BDL 10
N-Nitroso-di-n-propylamine BDL 10 Pentachlorophenol BDL so
Hexachloroethane BDL 10 Phenanthrene BDL 10
Nitrobenzene BDL 10 Anthracene BDL 10
Isophorone BDL 10 Di-n-butylphthalate BDL 10
2-Nitrophenol BDL 10 Fluoranthene BDL 10
2,4-Dimethylphenol BDL 10 Pyrene BDL 10
bis· ( 2-Chloroethoxy) methane BDL 10 Butylbenzylphthalate BDL 10
2,4-Dichlorophenol BDL 10 3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine BDL 20
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene BDL 10 Benzo(a)anthracene BDL 10
Naphthalene BDL 10 Chrysene BDL 10
Hexachlorobutadiene BDL 10 bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate BDL 10
4-Chloro-3-methylphenol BDL 10 Di-n-octylphthalate BDL 10
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene BDL 10 Benzo(b)fluoranthene BDL 10
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol BDL 10 Benzo(k)fluoranthene BDL 10
2-Chloronaphthalene BDL 10 Benzo(a)pyrene BDL 10
Dimethylphthalate BDL 10 Indeno(l,2,3-cd)pyrene BDL 10
Acenaphthylene BDL 10 Oibenz(a,h)anthracene BDL 10
Acenaphthene BDL 10 Benzo(g,h,i)perylene BDL 10
2,4-Dinitrophenol BDL so Benzidine BDL so
4-Nitrophenol BDL so 1,2-Diphenylhydrazine BDL 10
2,4-Dinitrotoluene BDL 10
----- -- --- - - -- - - -- -
---- - - - -
D a V i s ' F 1 o y d , I n c •
Page 4
Received: 02/13/90
-- --
Results by Sample
-- - - -
Laboratory Analysis Report
Work Order# 90-02-061
Continued From Above
SAMPLE ID 001 DISCHARGE FRACTION 01A TEST CODE EPA625 NAME SEMIVOLATILES METHOD 625
Date & Time Collected 02/13/90 10:05:00 Category
NOTES AND DEFINITIONS FOR THIS REPORT
NA= not analyzed
BDL = below the required detection limit.
B = compound detected in method blank.
--
DAVIS lllf;?all
vcc· :;✓.(_-~;,/
Chain of Custody Form
Pugc __ or __
FLOYD,, B16 Easl Dursl · Slreel, Greenwood, S.C. 29646 Phone (B03)229-5211 Fax (B03)229-7844
/
PROJ. NO. PROJECT NAME I PARAMETERS I
ti)
1-1 Ir 0: ~~~ i" ~~x ~0 534501 -<:::_ •le l?. 'I .Sfi.;-Lgy . NC, .,
' z ..,
< c..
SAM?: r,pn!NTED)
, ~ ~ ¼' 0 \; . ' ,\. "' -11/-a--u V _,. b'> _,
0 ' l :l c.. ... ::. ~ 0 ' "J cl' Lt, <
SAMPLE C/l
DATE TIME ~ SAMPLE DESCRIPTION 0 J'->--vc./ "c;• ,•/· NO. " z REMARf:S
o) 12F.:"dqO ,1" n 1 ✓ r-AI n=c.>< Ai<.r-t:-21 I 2 I ~
) tJfifRo 100 5 Iv /'>v"o I fh -v 1M Rr: t 2 J I 2 I I
( I v\ 001 •1~.,.cHAR6.c-ell ?~ I ~ ,~ I I JOOS
tJ 7 t F,;iJ?, ray I_,. • I J,c;:, /?, ,4,v'I/ I ) I I
I I I
I I
I I I
I I I I I
I I I I
I I
I I I
I I I
I I I I
I I I I i
I I I I
I I I
I I I
~ I DATE / TIME RECEIVED BY: RELINQUISHED BY: I DATE / TIME RECEIVED BY:
A
,1 h;1J ro I 1~00
(SIGNATURE) (SIGNATURE) I (SIGNATURE) -RELIN Q U ISIIEl(jl'l'! I DATE / TIME RECEIVED FOR LAB BY: (P DATE / TIME REMARKS
(SIGNATURE) I ,g1GNATURE) 1~./4A -/3-A I 'Yi C I v'Y)vy-,.,✓ p/7, , t'.' / C
IJIY-IJl<INt-:IN(; WATEH WW-W/\STE WATFH IIW-11.l~f/.HIHHI:,.: WA,._TI-'. .:..:11---=rn 111 ~lt-ll/'-."f\PIH'"JT TlllH' -------------------
---- - - --- - -- -- - ---D a V i s & F 1 o y d , I n c • Laboratory Analysis Report
Page 2 Work Order # 90-02-095
Received: 02/19/90 03/12/90 10:02:34
01 02 03 04
Test Description Units SBR SLUDGE SBR EFFLUENT EQUALIZATION SBR INFLUENT
TANK EFFLUENT
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CHROMIUM (TOTAL)
CHROMIUM (DISSOLVED)
COPPER (TOTAL)
COPPER (DISSOLVED)
IROtl (TOTAL)
!ROH (DISSOLVED)
ZI!lC (TOTAL)
ZIHC (DISSOLVED)
LEAD (TOTAL)
AIITIMONY (TOTAL)
ANTIMONY (DISSOLVED)
AMMONIA NITROGEN
NITRATE NITROGEN
TOTAL KJELDAHL NITROGEN
TOTAL SUSPENDED SOLIDS
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1 0.73
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1 3.39
mg/1
mg/1' 0.11
mg/1 0.016
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
<0.02
<0.02
242
<0.5 X
<0.010 X
<0.010 X
25.8 3.01
<0.05
64
<0.02
<0.02
<0.02
<0.02
5. 2
1.5
0.04
0.12
<0.005
<0.005
17
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
D a V i s & F 1 o y d , I n c • Laboratory Analysis Report
Page -3 Work Order# 90-02-095
Received: 02/19/90 03/12/90 10:02:34
05
Test Description Units PLANT INFLUENT
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CHROMIUM (TOTAL) mg/1 <0.02
CHROMIUM (DISSOLVED) mg/1 <0.02
ANTIMONY (TOTAL) mg/1 <0.005
ANTIMONY (DISSOLVED) mg/1 <0.005
BOD-5 mg/1 1315
SULFATE mg/1 6
AH.Motil A IIITROGEN mg/1 0.91
NITRATE NITROGEN mg/1 0.74
TOTAL PHOSPHORUS mg/1 <0.03
TOTAL KJELDAHL NITROGEN mg/1 0.97
PHENOLS mg/1 0.26
TOTAL SUSPENDED SOLIDS mg/1 29
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- - ---- - --- - --- - - -- -
-- - - --- - - - - - --- ---D a V i S F 1 o y d , I n c . Laboratory Analysis Report
Page 4 Work Order# 90-02-095
Received: 02/19/90 03/12/90 10:02:34
HOECHST CELANESE
DEFitlITIONS /\ND EXPLI\NI\TIONS :
1. I\N " X·" INDICATES I\ DILUTION DUE TO MATRIX INTERFERENCE.
DAVIS llllf;?alll Chain of Custody Form
FLOYD 616 East Durst' Slreel, Greenwood, S.C. 29646 Phone [phone] I Fax {603)229-7644
l'ROJ. NO. PROJECT NAME gi I PARAMETERS I
Ho,:-rHc:T-t,1,1t,J,:~c. Sl-ll'IAY Al .r. "' if
7/n'J _r, I z ~'o' ... ~i < 0 .lf • •
SA!,IPLERS ~AME/ AFFILlATJON:(PRINTED) ~ ~' •' ~ ;' ' 0 <" q,•"' ,..
r /,, / .-~Y(',7,7~,e:-.. ~ 0 J..' ,·
'-' .,0 ~' ~' o"' .,. , ' "" ~ ,,_,._ ,,., < ,., .. ,., ,_ a: ~
0 \ '<' I ' • ,, oo,
SAMPLE ;;: ci o<) "" 0.; ~; ~.., 0 .. o"' .~ ~ '><!'
DATE TIME 0 SAMPLE DESCRIPTION ., ~o ~' 'l'<'.;; < ~'1<"0
; v,
NO. '-' c., z Qi~ ' ~ ~ <" ' REMARKS
') I '-tt'-'1( 1/0c V' J?, f? .5 I 1_,,. r, /.... E I ;, ~ 1 /,
r, )' /1 "I b ./ V -5 Bf? ~ ,::p ;, I I ,,,,_t. r_f, Sb c.
() 1 /1 JJ ,,, '---~-l,,_.1--,;: -f,. rlt ~ I I / Ee .. J T. ,b EN·
'
Ct/ /· '/ ?D L.-~?: ,.., ,-,, ,{)/,_, ~ --f ~ I I I Fe ~b Cr
·---,, ,?/, • .d-r,., _p (. {'_ '-) I I? 4· L-I I I I I I S !'I <> Inf: F,
I sb C r,. ~ -
I ~ B" SI~.!•• , <I,
I r,. a1. 7 ...
I
'
I
RELINQUISHED BY: DATE / TIME RECEIVED BY: RELINQUISHED BY: DATE /I TIME RECEIVED BY:
(SIG~URE) , .· y,, -.L Z.-If~ <.f() ~p-g (SIGNATURE) (SIGNATURE) (SIGNATURE)
06~-/7 -1. d
'RELINQUISIIED BY: DATE / TIME rs t;~.
VE FOR U ~ BY: AT ~ / T~M, REMARKS
(SIGNATURE) I o ;7½ r,j ~ {). R, bi!) /Y~ l
LJW-llHlN~INl; WATl.::lt WW-WA::iTE WATlH II, -IIA'lAIWUUS WAS'! I ,U-SULIU AU-AUSUHUt:NT TUU~
GW-GROUNO WATF.R RC-RCilA SW -SURFACE WATER IM-IMPINGER SOLUTION
"' -c.. ,.
i'.:: -=
~ -.
;;:
< Ul ;: c C.
.,,
"~
I"''"' ..,J
J
.,J
I
I
----------------

-

-

-

-
-... ---------.. - --' ---D a V i s & Floyd, I n c . Laboratory Analysis Report
Page 2 Work Order # 90-02-116
Received: 02/22/90 03/13/90 08:47:06
01 02 03 04
Test Description Units SBR EFFLUENT SBR SLUDGE EQUALIZATION PLANT INFLUENT
EFFLUENT
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CHROMIUM (TOTAL)
CHROMIUM (DISSOLVED)
COPPER (TOTAL)
IRON (TOTAL)
IROII (DISSOLVED)
Z IIIC (TOTAL)
LEAD (TOTAL)
ANTIMONY (TOTAL)
AIITIMOIIY (DISSOLVED)
BOD-5
CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND
SULFATE
AMMONIA NITROGEN
NITRATE NITROGEN
TOTAL PHOSPHORUS
TOTAL KJELDA!IL NITROGEN
PHENOLS
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
mg/ 1
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
34.3
18
57
<0.01
0.01
0.99
353
14
4.20
0.14
<0.025 X <0.010 X
<O.OD5
5.2
0.02
0.01
<0.005
<0.005
2155
5280
6
0.71
0.13
0.03
0.69
0.090
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
D a V i s Floyd, I n C •
Page 3
Received: 02/22/90
Test Description Units
03/13/90 08:47:06
01
SBR EFFLUENT
02
SBR SLUDGE
Laboratory Analysis Report
Work Order I 90-02-116
Continued From Above
03
EQUALIZATION
EFFLUENT
04
PLANT INFLUENT
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL SUSPENDED SOLIDS mg/1 I 28
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
05
Test Description Units SBR INFLUENT
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
CHROMIUM (TOTAL) mg/1 0.01
CHROMIUM (DISSOLVED) mg/ 1 0.01
COPPER (TOTAL) mg/1 <0.02
COPPER (DISSOLVED) mg/1 <0.02
IRON (TOTAL) mg/1 15.9
IRON (DISSOLVED) mg/1 9.9
ZINC (TOTAL) mg/1 0.03
ZINC (DISSOLVED) mg/1 0.06
ANTIMONY (TOTAL) mg/1 <0.005
ANTIMONY (DISSOLVED) mg/1 <0.005
CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND mg/1 5680
TOTAL SUSPENDED SOLIDS mg/1 34
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--- --- ------- ------
---

-
---.. .. illlll -

-
-... ---

-
-D a V i s Floyd, I n c . Laboratory Analysis Report
Page 4 Work Order# 90-02-116
Received: 02/22/90 03/13/90 08:47:06
HOECHST CELANESE
DEFINITIONS /\ND EXPLl\Nl\TIONS
1. l\N " X " INDICATES l\ DILUTION DUE TO Ml\TRIX INTERFERENCE.
DAVI!:> lllf;.?11111 Chain of Custody Form
FLOYD 816 Easl Dursl · Slreel, Greenwood, S.C. 29646 Phone [phone] Fax [phone]
PP.OJ. NO. PROJECT NAME
SA;f PLERS NAME/ AFFILIATION:(PRINTED)
, 1 v f. )){ · 7/(~,_ ~ r .. J tif• .,J,.,. -!i-
v J J
SA;tPLE DATE TIME
0: '9 :a o! 8 '-' SAMPLE DESCRIPTION
NO.
ri 1-ZHo 0 ;! \ L--~ il A 1o re 1 .. ,~-\
[.~ ;,., z-{ r> 10, 7 ~ _.:, ao 5/,.,-lr <=--
r'-'i ,, i II(} L--,::,.,._,/ ,.:·i r,/J-{'
( {:' " II"
--' -,;' /,_ .J-T ,_ ./-'
-s ( ,, 111 < L--~-rl _(' ,-r
gJ I
"' Id r z /1' ~ ~' .~
0 0 ~ u .,c, ~' ;,-, ... c,,_J,-,,.'< ~ 0
OQ ... <' ,
0 ,, 0 , , .., " '\ ~., ~ z Qi~ I ;>-;>-,
z. ' I
3 I
7 I I
.cl I
DATE / TIME RECEIVED BY: RELINQUISHED BY:
I (SIGNATURE) (SIGNATURE)
z-n-'{o 145·::,
PARAMETERS
I
I I
I I I I
I I I'
DATE /I TIME
_J(ELINQUISHED BY:
(SIGNATURE)
REMARKS
UW-IJIUNKINli WATl::H
GW-GROUNO WATER
WW-lfM:iTE WATl::H
RC-RCRA
lilf-fjA,'.AIWUU~ WA~T~
Slf-$1.IRFACE WATER
SU-SULIU AU-AU~UHU~NT lUU~
IM-JMPINGER SOLUTION
REMARKS
RECEIVED BY:
(SIGNATURE)
, ,
-----------------
I
-

-
-------Davis ' ~•loyd, I n C •
Page 2
Received: 02/26/90
Teet Description Unite
CHROMIUM (TOTAL) mg/1
CHROMIUM (DISSOLVED) mg/1
COPPER (TOTAL) mg/1
COPPER (DISSOLVED) mg/1
IRON (TOTAL) mg/1
IRON (DISSOLVED) mg/1
ZINC (TOTAL) mg/1
ZINC (DISSOLVED) mg/1
LEAD (TOTAL) mg/1
ANTIMONY (TOTAL) mg/1
ANTIMONY (DISSOLVED) mg/1
AMMONIA NITROGEN mg/1
NITRATE NITROGEN mg/1
TOTAL KJELDAHL NITROGEN mg/1
TOTAL SUSPENDED SOLIDS mg/1
-
SBR
-
03/19/90
01
SLUDGE
0.68
3.43
0.13
0.032
---
07:51:42
02
SBR EFFLUENT
32.3
1.5
49.3
-
SBR
----Laboratory
Work Order
03
INFLUENT
0.01
0.01
<0.02
<0.02
2.9
2.4
0.04
0.08
<0.005
<0.005
5
Analysis Report
# 90-02-128
04
EQUALIZATION
TANK EFFLUENT
0.01
<0.01
401
400
<0.010 X
<0.005
-
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
D a Vi S ' l'loyd, I n C . Laboratory Analysis Report
Page 3 Work Order I 90-02-128
Received: 02/26/90 03/19/90 07:51:42
05
Test Description Units PLANT INFLUENT
CHROMIUM (TOTAL) mg/1 0.01
CHROMIUM (DISSOLVED) mg/1 <0.01
ANTIMONY (TOTAL) mg/1 <0.005
ANTIMONY (DISSOLVED) mg/1 <0.005
BOD-5 mg/1 2190
SULFATE mg/1 8
AMMONIA NITROGEN mg/1 0.69
NITRATE NITROGEN mg/1 <0.05
TOTAL PHOSPHORUS mg/1 0.04
TOTAL KJELDAHL NITROGEN mg/1 0.80
PHENOLS mg/1 0.094
TOTAL SUSPENDED SOLIDS mg/1 21
-----

-
-----------
-- - --... -- -----------Davis & Floyd, I n C • Laboratory Analysis Report
Page 4 Work Order# 90-02-128
Received: 02/26/90 03/19/90 07:51:42
BOBCBST CBLANBSB
DEFINITIONS AND EXPLANATIONS
1. AN " X " INDICATES A DILUTION DUE TO MATRIX INTERFERENCE·
~Yali
1'ogc __ u1 __
Chain of Custody Form
FLOYD 616 Easl Durst· Slrecl, Greenwood, S.C. 29646 Phone [phone] I Fax [phone]
I'ROJ. NO. PROJECT NAME gi ?/'---,---c,---,-,---'Pi-A:.:;R::..:A7M.:::ET~E::.:RFS'--,--,--,--,--,'/
7;,,-,_,....,, fln,rH<;T-r F' ""''"'~ • I S~f!fiRS NAME/AFF1);1ATION:(PRINTED)
( ~-1 >rc-yJ(,--Aa~ r 0
-
SAMPLE DATE TIME NO.
( ··; •-z,-'i :,t,-7_
l ·, ~) " IID 4-
.. . ' ' Jl;io ' . I
(·1 'I ,, II J .,-
t·: /) ,. , , d.0
'~-ELINQUISHED BY:
(SIGNATURE)
Uli-lllUNKINLl WATtH
GW-GROUNO WATER
0: ::s 0 u
~ SAMPLE DESCRIPTION
t.>
v ~2R _,/..,.di~~
.... ~AR G' .Pt ru ~ ---i
'-..... iRR .., -I
..... (,,,:,. /1~. I..:~ 1: ' I, r1>.J~
, ..... Pla-~J r,, {.
DATE / TIME
2-?{•a,,\,t.nl'.
RECEIVED BY:
(SIGNATURE)
u ...
0
0 z
' 2-
3
j
t
I
I
i
RELINQUISHED BY:
(SIGNATURE)
DATE / TIME RECEIVED FOR LAB BY: DATE / TIME
I
WW-IVASTt WAHi<
RC-RC RA
(SJGNATURE) j, I ! • /' I
l , l7,'. ' '' /,-·l( ,,/,.., ;),,~,/<>)'. /c" I l-·('• ?-
IIW-IIAZAHI/OUS WAST!:
SW-SURFAtE WATER
SU-SOLIU
IM-IMPINGER SOLUTION
I
I
I I
j I
I I I
DATE /I TIME
REMARKS
AIJ-AUSUIWt:NT TUUt:
REMARKS
F.-fb Cr 1tvL..
.
sb Cu. r r 7' -ILi/Le_
RECEIVED BY:
(SIGNATURE)
-------------------
--------- ----.. ----D a Vi S ' F l o y d , Inc Laooratory I\Oa.LyHLt:I .K~iJUL.L
Page 2 Work Order # 90-03-015
Received: 03/05/90 03/29/90 12:31:31
01 02 03 04
Test Description Units SBR SLUDGE SBR EFFLUENT SBR INP'LUENT EQUALIZATION
TANK EP'P'LUENT
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CHROMIUM (TOTAL) mg/1
CHROMIUM (DISSOLVED) mg/1
COPPER (TOTAL) mg/1
COPPER (DISSOLVED) mg/1
IRON (TOTAL) mg/1
IRON (DISSOLVED) mg/1
ZINC (TOTAL) mg/1
ZINC (DISSOLVED) mg/1
LEAD (TOTAL) mg/1
ANTIMONY (TOTAL) mg/1
ANTIMONY (DISSOLVED) mg/1
AMMONIA NITROGEN mg/1
NITRATE NITROGEN mg/1
TOTAL PHOSPHORUS mg/1
TOTAL KJELDAHL NITROGEN mg/1
TOTAL SUSPENDED SOLIDS mg/1
O.B4
3.74
0.14
0.036
15.9
2.97
.1.0
30.5
0.01
<0.01
<0.02
<0.02
0.7
<2 X
0.03
<0.02
0.006
<0.005
B
0.01
<0.01
237
<2 X
<0.005
<0.005
0.92
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
D a V i S , F l o y d , I n c • Laboratory Analysis Report
Page 3 Work Order# 90-03-015
Received: 03/05/90 03/29/90 12:31:31
05
Teat Description Unite PLANT INFLUENT
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CHROMIUM (TOTAL) mg/1 0.01
CHROMIUM (DISSOLVED) mg/1 <0.01
ANTIMONY (TOTAL) mg/1 <0.005
ANTIMONY (DISSOLVED) mg/1 <0.005
BOD-5 mg/1 2660
SULFATE mg/1 <15
I\MHONIA NITROGEN mg/1 • 0.55
NITRATE NITROGEN mg/1 <0.05
TOTAL PHOSPHORUS mg/1 0.05
TOTAL KJELDAHL NITROGEN mg/1 0.43
PHENOLS mg/1 0.40
TOTAL SUSPENDED SOLIDS mg/1 59
-----.. --

-
---

-

-
--
-----.. ------·------ - -Davis ' F 1 o y d , I n C Ll:I.UUL"4LUL"y fillCl.L'jtlJ.D l'it::pv.1. ,._
Page 4 Work Order# 90-03-015
Received: 03/05/90 03/29/90 12:31:31
BOBCIIBT gn-Mll&B
DEFINITIONS AND EXPLANATIONS :
1. AN• X • INDICATES A DILUTION DUE TO MATRIX INTERFERENCE.
2. • POSSIBLY INTERFERENCE FROM UNKNOWN ORGANICS.
~Yali Chain of Custody Form
FLOYD 816 Easl Durst· Slreel, Greenwood, S.C. 29646 Phone [phone] Fax [phone]
PROJ. NO. PROJECT NAME gi / PARAMETERS /
Q
LI ~ u·r, AV I it C:
7," ., ,r, I , wer. {,-,A •IC-•:.,; • ... ,.r t "' <
I cl' ., • • • ~ ... <
SAMµ HE/AFFIUATION:(PRIL) ~· , :c ~' .~ ' ( /;#/pt:, ,_.;IE_
~ ~ ,,. --· ...,
0 q• ',I..' ~· ~ u ' .,c.-, ' ~' o"' ~ ,., , , " 0.. ... Cl--"+: ., ' ~ \/ 0.: ~
0 , ~, l .... • .,, ,.. 0 ~
SAMPLE DATE TIME :ii SAMPLE DESCRIPTION d OQ .. ~ II' ~:, i~ d"" o"' .~ <"" t' cY 0
NO. 0 " :z: , .. ~ ~' ., '(' q~> REMARKS 0..
u I "
rY 7-,'-,;4 /~Pi ,.,, . <; iJJ..' ,., I,. ,,i,,"" I I " -.J .. J ,.
11) 1-~-fo 1,770 (.,, {1:?J< 1::lt z... I I P/..,t-;,f~ <"l C .., ..
or. ,,<-c,, /1 JO (.., ~-.~ r .,[' :? l I I £,-, ., T. ,L Fl'.!'. ...
o1-~---..... ,, II z ,, <., • E,:,,_,./, ---..: l ,::-.C+ -~ I I I r-4L Cr ...,,
05 3.,;-•~ II l.5 ~" Pi,,J T" .(> L I I I I I ( SR R ~-!'· ,~ -
Si, ,-. Cr.,,.,.... ·"
_c; II ll SJ..,...1 : 51,
-
C;, Pi. Zn
--
J
REUN ~ISHED BY: DATE / TIME RECEIVED BY: RELINQUISHED BY: DATE / TINE RECEIVED BY:
(SIGN ,}ui},y 1 11:/ ~ .r?;>I,,~ 1
(SIGNATURE) (SIGNATURE) I (SIGNATURE)
I. I -:'fl
l!'f:LINQUISHED BY: DATE / TIME RECEIVED FOR LAB BY: DATE / TIME REMARKS
(SIGNATURE) I ~GNATURJ)A: f_ fl [3'-6,,e,l/iz> / ..
UW-IJlllN!\INl; WATJ;:;IC WW-WASTE WATl:U IIW-l,'/1/IIUOUS WAST!:: SV-SOLW All-AUSOIIUl::NT TUUI::
GW-GROUNll WATER RC-RC RA SW-S FACE WATER IM-IMPINGER SOLUTION
V
-

-

-

-
--------·--

-
... ---
------Davis ' F l o y d ,
Page 2
Received: OJ/14/90
Teet Description
CHROMIUM (TOTAL)
CHROMIUM (DISSOLVED)
COPPER (TOTAL)
COPPER (DISSOLVED)
IRON (TOTAL)
IRON (DISSOLVED)
ZINC (TOTAL)
ZINC (DISSOLVED)
LEAD (TOTAL)
ANTIMONY (TOTAL)
ANTIMONY (DISSOLVED)
AMMONIA NITROGEN
NITRATE NITROGEN
TOTAL KJELDAHL NITROGEN
TOTAL SUSPENDED SOLIDS
-

-
-

-
I n C •
Unite
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
04/02/90 13:12:40
01
SBR SLUDGE
0.55
2.51
0.075
0.016
02
SBR EFFLEUNT
15.8
1.12
29.6
----

-
Laboratory Analysis Report
Work Order# 90-03-067
OJ
SBR INFLUENT
04
EQUALIZATION
TANK EFFLUENT
<0.01
0.01
<0.02
<0.02
2.5
<2 X
0.04
O.OJ
<0.005
<0.005
10
0.02
0.01
222
<2 X
<0.005
<0.005
0.22
--
Davia ' Floyd, I n c • Laboratory Analysis Report
Page 3 Work Order I 90-03-067
Received: 03/14/90 04/02/90 13:12:40
OS
Teet Description Unite PLANT EFFLUENT
CHROMIUM (TOTAL) mg/1 <0.01
CHROMIUM (DISSOLVED) mg/1 <0.01
ANTIMONY (TOTAL) mg/1 0.018
ANTIMONY (DISSOLVED) mg/1 <0.005
BOD-5 mg/1 2060
SULFATE mg/1 4
AMMONIA NITROOEN mg/1 0.18
NITRATE NITROOEN mg/1 0.95
TOTAL PHOSPHORUS mg/1 0.04
TOTAL KJELDAHL NITROOEN mg/1 0.39
PHENOLS mg/1 0.34
TOTAL SUSPENDED SOLIDS mg/1 52
-----------------~------------------------------------------------------------------------
-·------

-
--

-
---

-
--
--

-

-
-

-

-

-

-
--
Davis & F 1 o y d , I n C •
Page 4
Received: 03/14/90 04/02/90 13:12:40
IIOIICBBT CBLIINBSII
DEFINITIONS:
1. THE" X" INDICATES MATRIX INTERFERENCE WHICH HAY REQUIRE
A DILUTION OR WHICH PREVENTS THE REPORTING OF A RESULT.
-____ ,_ --Laboratory Analysis Report
Work Order I 90-03-067
DAVIS --~711111111 FLOYD
L1W:.5CU '~( l'ogc I of J_
Chain of Custody Form
816 East Durst· Slreel, Greenwood, S.C. 29646 Phone [phone] Fax [phone]
l'ROJ. NO. PROJECT NAME IQ I PARAMETERS
7v,,,_r., ,4 7 ,-~, c; T. r ,-• ~ l'1 ,:-c. , _', j..j.J:I qy Al r I # ~
q'<I' ]' « "' < ., • • ~ N
SAMPLERS NA~FIUATION:(PRINTED) ~' .~ ~ ~~ ,' ;
CLc,u ~o c.JA 1--r/l of"i:A!-4 rJ!(_ 0 '< .i. '1L."
0 .,0
-o· '/...' ~· ~ ..I
I /;.LN'7' y'O-«:½----
u ' ~' 0.,, , , ., ~
... .. ,._t < ,~ ., 0. ..
---~ :s z
0: ~
0 '\ ~'\ I ' • ., 00 < ~
SAMPLE DATE TIME :s SAMPLE DESCRIPTION d OQ c,'7,Q ... ~; ~.., 0 .. o"' .,t ~ ~ (I)
NO. 0
.,,. q'<". <'. 4)-<"• v 0
u '-' z .-. . ~ ~. " 0..
' REMARKS
~-/3'-9• • V <; /2.I) Sl .... o6F I I I« -I.J. ICA
13.,1.'u> V ,c P," !'r:-~ 7.. I I lo!,.~ T f, .'S"I, C, I'"
5.u.q. V SB~ :X:.tJF .3 I I I t: 1-r., ~no. .....
•-IJ-2o V ,:;-.,,., ,"~41;~, T.,..,,,. FF'F ..3 I I I F,-db c.-"'"
l.JJ.91 V PLA ... I :c .. ,~ I.. I I I I I I ~ a o t: C'. F~ ., -.
Sb• ,. --·"
C:.. 0 Cl._.' • rO .
,--, ,,, .,._ -7 -,
,--,
. I l ,-7 JR '-f • •
'
REUNQUI~~ BY: DATE / TIME RECEIVED BY: RELINQUISHED BY: DATE /I TIME RECEIVED BY:
(S1NATUR 3-13·'10 ~/'y'.5
(SIGNATURE) (SIGNATURE) (SIGNATURE)
,I 'A~~~ "' .
RELINQUISHED BY: DATE / TIME R ;< II D FOR l ~r; : -31i[ / TIME REMARKS
(SIGNATURE) I r G if 1rJifli I /n I qo 11,L\C
UW-IJl!IN ~/Nt; WAHi! WW-WAS'l'L WATl:H 11•-IIAZAltUUW WA "I' IJ-SULIIJ AU-AUtiUl!Ul:NT TUUl:
GW-GROUND WATER RC-RCRA S -SURFACE lfATE M-IMPINGER SOLUTION
-------------· -

-

-
,_ --
--·---
Davis ' Floyd,
Page 2
Received: 03/16/90
Teet Description
CHROMIUM (TOTAL)
CHROMIUM (DISSOLVED)
COPPER (TOTAL)
COPPER (DISSOLVED)
IRON (TOTAL)
IRON (DISSOLVED)
ZINC (TOTAL)
ZINC (DISSOLVED)
LEAD (TOTAL)
ANTIMONY (TOTAL)
ANTIMONY (DISSOLVED)
CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND
AMMONIA NITROGEN
NITRATE NITROGEN
TOTAL KJELDAHL NITROGEN
TOTAL SUSPENDED SOLIDS
-

-
----
I n c •
04/02/90 13:13:06
Unite
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
01
SBR SLUDGE
0.52
2.36
0.150
0.021
02
SBR EFFLUENT
12.1
2.00
24.2
--

-
--
Laboratory Analysis Report
Work Order I 90-03-089
03
SBR INFLUENT
04
EQUALIZATION
TANK BFFLUBNT
<0.01
<0.01
<0.02
<0.02
2.0
<2 X
<0.02
<0.02
<0.005
<0.005
2776
11
0.01
<0.01
248
<0.2 X
<0.010 X
<0.005
0.32
--
Davis ' Floyd, I n c . Laboratory Analyeie Report
Page 3 Work Order I 90-03-089
Received: 03/16/90 04/02/90 13:13:06
05
Teet Deecriptlon Unite PLANT INFLUENT
CHROMIUM (TOTAL) mg/1 <0.01
CHROMIUM (DISSOLVED) mg/1 <0.01
ANTIMONY (TOTAL) mg/1 <0.005
ANTIMONY (DISSOLVED) mg/1 <0.005
BOD-5 mg/1 1727
CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND mg/1 3176
SULFATE mg/1 5
AMMONIA NITROGEN mg/1 0.32
NITRATE NITROGEN mg/1 0.11
TOTAL PHOSPHORUS mg/1 0.04
TOTAL KJELDAHL NITROGEN mg/1 0.59
PHENOLS mg/1 0.182
TOTAL SUSPENDED SOLIDS mg/1 26
--·------------

-
---
- - - ----

-
-

-
---

-
--

-
--
D a Vis , F 1 o y d , I n C • Laboratory Analysis Report
Page 4 Work Order I 90-03-0B9
Received: 03/16/90 04/02/90 13:13:06
BOBCBST Cl!LIUll!SB
DEFINITIONS AND EXPLANATIONS:
1. AN" X" INDICATBS A DILUTION DUE TO MATRIX INTERFERENCE.
DAVIS
1111111;.?IIIII Chain of Custody Form
FLOYD B 16 East Durst· Streel, Greenwood, S.C. 29646 Phone [phone] Fax [phone]
i'HOJ. NO. PHOJECT NAME gi I PARAMETERS I
71n2 n, Horr HC.T-r r, ,,.,.,.~ ~ . _c; 1 .. i"i: I AV "' if
~•.r ~ o• • f " 0 4f q ~t •
SAMPLERS NAME/AFFILIATION:(PRINTED) ~' l' ,' ' 0 Q .... ,,_.
w r :c. n l 0 ,,_. V
Sohl'\ 11.
u "c., <-' ;,-, o"' , ., • , ,., I<, ...... -,,._tc ? ,., -,.,
a.: ~
0 ' ~\ I '\ • .,, 00
SAMPLE ::s d OQ ,/ o , ~; ~, 0.. 01< • r ....
NO. DATE TIME 0 SAMPLE DESCRIPTION I ~ ~ , <, '20 '(' q'<". :t°~ d3_ b v
~ z ,1<'
u , ' " REMARKS
,-:-,; ... -1,-il /bl If I 5 NR ~ D D a .12_ ' I " ~ 1 ,.
rv ,_,, .. f• Iii>.'~.-I SB 1t £ p,:;-u ,}.. I I Pl,"kr"f .. <:i C, -
113 ?--,s-1• 11:1• I .5 ,> D "1: "1 r::' "I I I I I ~ 1-r: '«-N·
01 7_,r-,;. JO;:,,-I ,: , . :t. -1f"",._,,_L F Fr l I I I Fr ~b Cr
o"S l-,j-1• ;J: ;Ju I 4......-r' "TV\ F ' I I I I I I I ~ <> <> lCai"• F~
sbc, ... r,.z~
_c; R fl s1 .... .L~ : S!, -r,. Pi. z~
/_
--
I ',..., r,,.--.., A I ,, .
I I JUI ..:>(.../1-/ ,
(
I
RELINQUISHED BY: DATE / TIME RECEIVED BY: RELINQUISHED BY: DATE / TIME RECEIVED BY:
(SIGNATURE) . aJ -!1 , ,, .. ,..--9.\ JI',-., (SIGNATURE) (SIGNATURE) I (SIGNATURE)
(I _d-h,. 13 . "
RELINQUISIIEO' BY: DATE / TIME RECEIVED FOR LAB BY, DATE / TIME REMARKS
(SIGNATURE) I ,(/>~GNATURE) k l /)_ 3-/1.. ~ v15 o X J A
UW-IHllNl\ltH; WA'l'll( WW-WM:iTl:: WATLH 11w-1;'t'ft'wous lfAsTt: SU-SOLIU AIJ-AUSUIIULNT lUUt:
GW-GROUNO WATf.R RC-RCRA SW-S FACE WATER IM-IMPJNGER SOLUTION
------------------
Q
"' "' < p., N
~ ~
:'.l ..J <·
Q, 1= ::E z ~ ~ 0 Q,
""
..
It,, LI
.,_
"·'"
,,. "·
-
---·---Davis ' Floyd,
Page 2
Received: 03/21/90
Teet Description
-----· ----I n c •
Units
04/12/90 09:09:32
02 01
SBR SLUDGE SBR EFFLUENT
Laboratory Analysis Report
Work Order# 90-03-100
03
SBR INFLUENT
04
EQUALIZATION
TANK EFFLUENT
-
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CHROMIUM (TOTAL)
CHROMIUM (DISSOLVED)
COPPER (TOTAL)
COPPER (DISSOLVED)
IRON (TOTAL)
IRON (DISSOLVED)
ZINC (TOTAL)
ZINC (DISSOLVED)
LEAD (TOTAL)
ANTIMONY (TOTAL)
ANTIMONY (DISSOLVED)
SULFATE
AMMONIA NITROGEN
NITRATE NITROGEN
TOTAL PHOSPHORUS
TOTAL KJELDAHL NITROGEN
TOTAL SUSPENDED SOLIDS
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1 0.27
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1 1.43
mg/1
mg/1 0.048
mg/1 0.035
mg/1
mg/1 <3
mg/1 12 .0
mg/1 2.95
mg/1 0.40
mg/1 34.8
mg/ 1
<0.01
0.01
<0.02
<0.02
<0.1
<0.28
0.06
0.02
<0.005
<0.005
21
<0.01
<0.01
182
<0.2 X
<0.005
<0.005
0.40
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
D a Vi B ' F 1 o y d , I n C • Laboratory Analysis Report
Page 3 Work Order I 90-03-100
Received: 03/21/90 04/12/90 09:09:32
05
Teet Description Unite PLANT EFFLUENT
CHROMIUM (TOTAL) mg/1 <0.01
CHROMIUM (DISSOLVED) mg/1 0.01
ANTIMONY (TOTAL) mg/1 <0.005
ANTIMONY (DISSOLVED) mg/1 <0.005
BOD-5 mg/1 1265
SULFATE mg/1 <3
AMMONIA NITROGEN. mg/1 0.23
NITRATE NITROGEN mg/1 0.30
TOTAL PHOSPHORUS mg/1 0.03
TOTAL KJELDAHL NITROGEN mg/1 0.52
PHENOLS mg/1 0.100
TOTAL SUSPENDED SOLIDS mg/1 14
---·---- -
-,_ ---· ------
.. - - --- - --,_ -D a V i s ' F 1 o y d , I n c •
Page 4
Received: 03/21/90 04/12/90 09:09:32
BOBCBBT CBLAHBSB
DEFINITIONS:
1. THE 00 X" INDICATES MATRIX INTERFERENCE WHICH HAY REQUIRE
A DILUTION OR WHICH PREVENTS THE REPORTING OF A RESULT.
- - ------Laboratory Analysis Report
Work Order# 90-03-100
U\LVJ \U~
Chain · of Custody
" V
Forni DAVIS ~--FLOYD 816 East Durst· Street, Greenwood, S.C. 29646 Phone [phone] Fax [phone]
PROJ. NO. PROJECT NAME I PARAMETERS I
gJ
71n2.r>1 f-lnrrHc:T-r ,., , .,.,.. S 1-i°► I A V A I r I It
l'" i -0 • •
SAMPLERS NAME/AFFIUATJON:(PRINTED) ~ i ,
~' ""' '
Jc(l/t-f ~,4,2 S:o,../
0 0 ~ .•• ~·
t.l "'" ~' ~' o" Q J..' '" ,,,.
' ' ... ~,. .. ...._1: ~ ,, -0 ., ---~ 0 .,.; ~ ' \ , ' '\. •
SAMPLE DATE TIME :,i SAMPLE DESCRIPTION d o" ,,., ; t' o" 0 .t ,.. 0
NO. 0 ' ~~ ~ <, e,_O ~ o."· 'J!',f<"• v
u " z ~ REMARKS " '
J-u>-1o 1,-,Q:I/; I/ ,RR \1111"\r,r-I l i<,,./),
.lr,.fu Ill_'••,,. I,/ <, ii. R Effl 11CA1T 2. I I lo~_i ~ r. <el C, ,
3 -Lo-9J 11:,r, ,I <., Rt\ T~IFUicf\/T '.I I I I ~ /T._L,:f>~.
13-Z...-'b 11:20 ,I rf'lf IAI /A1fl ,r. TAAtK f Ff. "".2, I I I F'.-4L Cr
.,.1...."o u: ?c, J P!:/lfv.T TJ11FL11f"AIT C, I I I ' I I I < a O :i:0 I'· F~
sb -r,...,.
C f/1 0 Cl._.' ' q, -,
r,. °' ,._ , •
.
-r, ,,..:-< T){) u
I
I
REUNQUli»D BY: DATE / TIME RECEIVED BY: RELINQUISHED BY1 . DATE /I TIME RECEIVED BY:
(Sl%TUR LJ-2..>-'¼o l1.i:,o
(SIGNATURE) (SIGNATURE) (SIGNATURE)
/ ,,,. ,,.
RELINQUISHED BY: DAT~ / TIME .\ll ~ IVI '-~?R ltr t{ $_iii TIME REMARKS
(SIGNATURE) I . I" ~ n JV I I/ 1J01 On1J.: ~'Y)
OW-llHINl>INt; WAf~H WW-WA:::iTt WATU< m ~IIA'lAIUJOU~ WA! 'I". ·u-souu AU-AU~Ol<U~NT TUil~
GW-GROUNO WATER RC-RCRA SW-SURFACE WATER M-IMPINGER SOLUTION
. ----------
"' ~
w ...,
0..
" < <I)
\J•
I 1v
"· ...
"'
--------·---------
0
"" < N <
..J <
i== z w ,-.
0
"-
-
- ----

-
Davis ' Floyd,
Page 2
Received: 03/28/90
Test Description
CHROMIUM (TOTAL)
CHROMIUM (DISSOLVED)
COPPER (TOTAL)
COPPER (DISSOLVED)
IRON (TOTAL)
IRON (DISSOLVED)
ZINC (TOTAL)
ZINC (DISSOLVED)
LEAD (TOTAL)
ANTIMONY (TOTAL)
ANTIMONY (DISSOLVED)
AMMONIA NITROGEN
NITRATE NITROGEN
TOTAL KJELDAHL NITROGEN
TOTAL SUSPENDED SOLIDS
-

-
----I n C •
Unite
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
04/23/90 12:28:58
01
SBR SLUDGE
0.70
2.91
0.065
0.044
I,
02
SBR EFFLUENT
10.1
0.22
33.0
-

-
---Laboratory Analysis Report
Work Order I 9,0-03-132
03
SBR INFLUENT
04
EQUAL/NEUT.TANK
EFFLUENT
0.01
<0.01
<0.02
<0.02
2.7
<0.1
0.03
0.04
<0.005
<0.005
16
<0.01
<0.01
257
<0.1
<0.005
<0.005
0.89
--
Davis ' Floyd, I n c • Laboratory Analysis Report
Page 3 Work Order I 90-03-132
Received: 03/28/90 04/23/90 12:28:58
05
Teet Description Unite PLANT INFLUENT
CHROMIUM (TOTAL) mg/1 <0.01
CHROMIUM (DISSOLVED) mg/1 <0.01
ANTIMONY (TOTAL) mg/1 <0.005
ANTIMONY (DISSOLVED) mg/1 <0.010 X
80D-5 mg/1 4408_
SULFATE mg/1 4
AMMONIA ·NITROGEN mg/1 0.58
NITRATE NITROGEN mg/1 0.13
TOTAL PHOSPHORUS mg/1 <0.03
TOTAL KJELDAHL NITROGEN mg/1 0.87
PHENOLS mg/1 0.069
TOTAL SUSPENDED SOLIDS mg/1 45
I,.
-------

-
------

-
----
-- -- - - -- --· -D a V i s ' F 1 o y d , I n c •
Page 4
.Received: 03/28/90 04/23/90 12:28:58
BOBCBST CELAHBSB
DEFINITIONS:
1. THE " X • INDICATES MATRIX INTERFERENCE WHICH KAY REQUIRE
A DILUTION OR WHICH PREVENTS THE REPORTING OF A RESULT.
--------Laboratory Analysis Report
Work Order# 90-03-132
-
DAVIS
11111111;?1111
, I [ 1 ( t) / ,/ ,_/, / ,, --"--Pogc o-1 or !2.J
FWYD
Ch a in of Custody Form
816 East Dur:sl · Street, Greenwood, S.C. 29646 Phone [phone] Fax [phone]
PROJ. NO. PROJECT NAME I I PARAMETERS I
0
Ho,:-rHc;T-IE•"•'t:'«,. S /.I.El r.,y
# 0:
7/n?.rll klr q'd" f ,Ir w < ., 0 ~ N • ~
SAMPLERS NAMB/AFFIUATION:(PRINTED)
~ >' ,
0.,, ~-~ ' J' ....
JEJZI'/ Dcl/1?5on/
0 q' 'J...' ;;-· ~ ..,
u ' o"' <
" ' , , ., Q, i=
r,,. .. ,...,,
/
,., ., ' :,; z
~ ~
0 ' ' ' • ., ,., (J < w
SAMPLE DATE TIME SAMPLE DESCRIPTION 0 ~ ,,~. 0 '
, ;i.~ 0 .. o"' l <~.,,<''t VO
(/) ...
NO. 0
~~ f' ~'<', 0
u " ;z; ,v 0 ' ~-., REMARKS Q,
,,--I •1?L /b.'Z,, .I SBR \11 Jf\f,F I ' "' -.J. ,. "
(•,;J r.2~,. J ... : 30 ,I SRR EfflllC~,T 1 I I Pl.,i T_f, Sb C, ""
(,j --· J/0:Z., ,I C:,RI\ I fl/ fl-' ic NT :3 J I I ~~->.T. L _,pi,' I"'..,
" I I ,I [{)1111,. t A,rr ,r TANK F.Ff, ~
.
( ' s.n.,. J/.'ID I I I .,._ ~b Cr •-'"
r· -~) l•Jll, ,;, 30 .I PL/IAIT iA.1F11 ,r M.T Io I I I i I I s P. " i:-I'' r, ,, . . . sb r r,. z -"'
c;gfl S/..,,..J•-: Sb -r,. Pi. 7-. .
__...,,..._ -. .
I './C ~UN1 '
~ I
I
REUNQUIS ED BY: OATE / TIME RECEIVED BY: RBIJNQUISHBD BY1 DATE / TIME RECEIVED BY:
_(~NAT? ) . ~lz?.b.ol12:0D (SIGNATURE) (SIGNATURB) I (SIGNATURE)
-. -/ 1.
RELIN'QOISHED BY: DATE / TIME RECEIVED FOR ~YI .A DATE / TIME REMARKS
(SIGNATURE) I . I (SVNATURE) /2 -5"<0':Jlo) / .J, ,, ,~, ('t 'b .. ·
UW-llllll<~INU WAHi! WW-WAS'l't: WA'l't:ll IIW-IIAZirc,ou:; WA::.,•t: SIJ-SOLII) AU-AUSUltUl:N'J' TUUI:
GW-GROUND WATER RC-RCRA SW-SUR CE WATER IM-IMPINGER SOLUTION
-.. -. ---

-
-· --1· -

-

-
-

-

-

-

-
-· ... -

-
------
---

-
--
D a V i 9 F 1 o y d ,
Page 2
Received: 04/04/90
Teet Description
CHROMIUM (TOTAL)
CHROMIUM (DISSOLVED)
COPPER (TOTAL)
COPPER (DISSOLVED)
IRON (TOTAL)
IRON (DISSOLVED)
ZINC (TOTAL)
ZINC (DISSOLVED)
LEAD (TOTAL)
ANTIMONY (TOTAL)
ANTIMONY (DISSOLVED)
AMMONIA NITROGEN
NITRATE NITROGEN
TOTAL KJELDAHL NITROGEN
TOTAL SUSPENDED SOLIDS
------I n c •
04/23/90 12:21:58
Unite
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
01
SBR SLUDGE
0.20
1.04
0.16
0.037
02
SBR EFFLUENT
15.3
0.12
42.4
l,
-

-
---Laboratory Analysis Report
Work Order I 90-04-016
03
SBR INFLUENT
04
EQUAL./NEUT.TAN
EFFLUENT
0.01
<0.01
<0.02
<0.02
1.7
<0.l
0.04
0.05
<0.005
<0.005
19
<0.01
<0.01
218
1.5
<0.005
<0.005
0.26
--
-
Davis F 1 o y d ,
Page 3
Received: 04/04/90
Teet Description
CHROMIUM (TOTAL)
CHROMIUM (DISSOLVED)
ANTIMONY (TOTAL)
ANTIMONY (DISSOLVED)
BOD-5
SULFATE
AMMONIA NITROGEN
NITRATE NITROGEN
TOTAL PHOSPHORUS
TOTAL KJELDAHL NITROGEN
PHENOLS
TOTAL SUSPENDED SOLIDS
-

-
---
I n c . Laboratory Analysis Report
Work Order I 90-04-016
04/23/90 12:21:58
05
Units PLANT INFLUENT
mg/1 <0.01
mg/1 <0.01
mg/1 <0.005
mg/1 <0.005
mg/1 1241
mg/1 4
mg/1 <0.10
mg/1 0.25
mg/1 <0.03
mg/1 o. 51
mg/1 0.11
mg/1 15
l,.
---

-
-

-
-------
-------------------DAVIS
llllla; .. Chain of Custody Farm
Poge __ or
FLOYD B16 Easl Dural· Street, Greenwood, S,C, 29646 Phone [phone] Fax (603)22ll-7B44
PROJ. NO. PROJECT NAME
7/li?.ril fln,rHC:T-r ,,.,,..,,,,,,,,. Si-J.t=J AV kl r
SAMPLERS NAME/AFFILIA•flON:(PRINTED)
(]"'£~1<-{ ~i=A~5oAI
SAMPLE DATE TIME ~ ~
NO. 8 c,
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION
o/ ✓ SBR \L 111\r.. i:
Efflll/: A,T
,,3 ,/ <',RI\ TfllfllJCAIT
of ' 1/.'uo
JJ-it9~ 1/.'Z, j PL/INT ih1FL111MT
J vv
I
1. I
I
REUNQUISH~ED BY: . DATE / TIME RECEIVED BY: RBLINQUISHED BY1 ,} -/_ I (SIGNATURE) (SIGNATURE) (SIGl:jATURE .
~ /nA,t,...,, -., .t...,
RELINQUISHED BY:
(SIGNATURE)
J..1.13/'!ll I '.1 ;n" t,.
DATE / TIME RECEIVED FOR ~-B BY1 /1 DATE / TIME
I . ~~ATURE) ,K.'/. /L ~4-21/16
WW-WA~TI: WATl:H IIW-IIA'qJIUJOUl; WA:.,·t: SD-SOLlil
PARAMETERS
I
I
I
I I
I I I
DATE /I TIME
REMARKS
AU-AUl;Ul<Ul:NT ·ruui;
/
"' ~
~ "' ~
REMARKS
:M. ..__ I I ,,
sl-f":u. t'"r., '"'''·
RECEIVED BY:
(SIGNATURE)
0 "' < N ~
..J < §
~ 0 "'
Ull-lllUNKIN(; WAHH
GW-GROUND WATER RC-_RCRA ... ______ !i_W:-~ll""-''1-A,:,::C:,eE:._W!:.!A::.:Tc:Ee,R __ ,::IM::,.-_:l:::M.:.P.:.:.IN:,::G:.::E.:.:.R..:S:.::O:.::LU:::.T:.:l:::.O:.:.N ___________________ __,
----

-
-
Davis ' F 1 o y d ,
Page 2
Received: 04/06/90
Teet Description
CHROMIUM (TOTAL)
CHROMIUM (DISSOLVED)
COPPER (TOTAL)
COPPER (DISSOLVED)
IRON (TOTAL)
IRON (DISSOLVED)
ZINC (TOTAL)
ZINC (DISSOLVED)
LEAD (TOTAL)
ANTIMONY (TOTAL)
ANTIMONY (DISSOLVED)
CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND
AMMONIA NITROGEN
NITRATE NITROGEN
TOTAL KJELDAHL NITROGEN
TOTAL SUSPENDED SOLIDS
----

-
-I n c •
05/07/90 09:02:48
Unite
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
01
SBR SLUDGE
0.75
2.94
0.10
0.080
02
SBR EFFLUENT
11. 9
0.70
38.4
-----Laboratory Analysis Report
Work Order# 90-04-044
03
SBR INFLUENT
04
EQUAL/ NEUT.TA
EFFLUENT
<0.01
<0.01
<0.02
<0.02
1.3
<0.1
0.05
0.08
0.007
<0.005
2602
<l
<0.01
<0.01
81.7
1.1
<0.005
<0.005
0.37
--·
D a V i s ' F l o y d , I n c • Laboratory Analysis Report
Page 3 Work Order# 90-04-044
Received: 04/06/90 05/07/90 09:02:48
OS
Teet Description Unite PLANT INFLUENT
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CHROMIUM (TOTAL) mg/1 <0.01
CHROMIUM (DISSOLVED) mg/1 0.01
ANTIMONY (TOTAL) mg/1 <0.005
ANTIMONY (DISSOLVED) mg/1 <0.005
BOD-5 mg/1 4738
CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND mg/1 5010
SULFATE mg/1 <3
AMMONIA NITROGEN mg/1 0.26
NITRATE NITROGEN mg/1 <0.05
TOTAL PHOSPHORUS mg/1 <0.03
TOTAL KJELDAHL NITROGEN mg/1 0.39
PHENOLS mg/1 0.17
TOTAL SUSPENDED SOLIDS mg/1 13
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-- - - -- - -- - - - -- - -- --
------------------

-
Cj(JJ'fU'+~
~~
o!
Chain of Custody Form
FLOYD 616 Easl Dursl · Slreel, Greenwood, S.C. 29646 Phone [phone] Fax [phone]
PRO/. NO. PROJECT NAME I I PARAMETERS /
Atuii'-#
0
7ln2.l'"I /
LJ. , H<:T-r r, ,,..,,.._,: . 4 J.J.,:: I ll V
. . 0:
Al r 'ii-
.., <
, . .. • i -K ~ N • ~
SAMPLERS NAMB/AFFIUATION:(PRINTED)
~ 'i ,'
Jt;/2/. 'I P£11~SOA/
~"' •" ; ...
8 .," 0 ~ </ 'J...' ~· ~ ..J
' ~' o" <
~ \-""t ~ ,., .,.' I C, 0.. ~
c.: ~ ' ' ' ' • ,~ o· ~ ~
SAMPLE DATE TIME :II SAMPLE DESCRIPTION 0 o'Q ., .. 0. • ' ;i-•. 0 .. o"' .'• :c-" f <:t' v~ "'
NO. 0 ~· '(' , o.'<'~ 0
(.) '-' ;r; ,, ~-.. REMARKS
.,_
1/kfro ,w:'ls J <.RR \1111\t:. r-I I MM-L/, ,,.
,;Jef9o 11:15 ,/ '-,., R EffLirCAtT
., I I Pl,-1-. :r, r, sl c. Iv
1/-15/:}d /f:I) ,I <, RI\ Tl\lfLIICAfT ' . I I '· I , ~ • T: .L ~r,c. ,.
,i/,:;/c;o 10:36 ,/ rflr 1111. 1t11ri ,r. TAArl< C ff. _J I I I r-_ .rl C,,-., C
;,J.k/91, /J:Jo ✓ PL/INT IMFLI1ffdf '7 J I I I I I I <; A (l ~-I'· CJ ... ,
_ct.,.. . r,. 7',. ...
C: " /l ~, .... ..I ,cc -
C,~ Pl 7-
, -
--r I .J, I I) <., { ) f-1 '-1 .
I I ' • I
, ----.
I
REUNQUISHEI BY: DATE / TIME RECEIVED BY 1 RBIJNQUISHBD BY1 DATE /I TIME RECEIVED BY:
(~ATURZ. ,;ls/9ol1't:.1o (SIGNATURE) (SIGNATURE) (SIGNATURE)
,....,,., ~
RELINQUISHED BY: DATE / TIME RE 1'1 IVJ J FOR ~-B ''1l, 4 ATf / TIME REMARKS
(SIGNATURE) I . f1 c, t1 l~h in w/ib//ry""
UII-UUIN~INU WAHi< WW-WAST~ WA"rrn 11, i-llA:I.AllllUUS W s ·i: Sll-5UUI> AU-AUSUltUl:NT TUUI:
GW-GROUND WATER RC-JlCllA SW-SURFACE WATER IM-IMPINGER SOLUTION
.. -----, --
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
5050H190
C
APPENDIX III
INNER TIER
INFLUENT/EFFLUENT CLP WATER QUALITY
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Client Sanple t.D.#:
IEA Assigned EPA#:
Date S8111)le red:
Sa~le Matrix:
Contract No.: 68-~8-0045
Date Reported:
TARGET CCJ4PCUNDS/ANALYTES
VOA TARGETED CQMPOONOS (ug/L)
Methylene Chloride
Acetone
Carbon Disulfide
1,2-Dichloroethene (total)
2-Butanone
Trichloroethene
Benzene
Chlorobenzene
METALS (ug/l)
Chromiun
TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED CCMPOUNDS
VOA NON-TARGETED COMPOUNDS (ug/l)
Ethanol
2-Hethyl·Propanol
Butanal
2-Propyl Furan
Substituted Formic Acid
Substituted Acetic Acid
Tetrahydro-Furan
Substituted Propane
Substituted Butanoic Acid
Unknown
Unknown
Trimethyl Si lanol
Substituted Formic Acid
Ethanol (ACN)
Methyl Ester Acetic Acid
Substituted Propane
Substituted Butanoic Acid
Substituted Butanoic Acid
Substituted Butanoic Acid
Unknown
Substituted Formic Acid
Substituted Propane
Substituted Butanoic Acid
Substituted Acetic Acid
Unknown
Ethenyl Ester Formic Acid
Unknown Hydrocarbon
1-Chloro-2-Methyl Propane
Ethyl Ester Butanoic Acid
Acetic Acid Butyl Ester
1-Hexanol
Unknown Hydrocarbon
Unknown
Butanol
Unknown
2-Methyl Propanoic Acid
EFFCLPVC.~K1 Revised 5/25/90
voes ANO CHRCJ! I UH
DETECTED IN INNER TIER
INFLUENT/EFFLUENT SAMPLES
HC/SHELBY, N.C.
SESTINGHOOSE PROJECT: 4124·85·050H
#2: Inner
Tier
Influent
HC139
2/9/90
'MATER
3/20/90
470
12 J
51
38
29
31.2
100 J
600 J
300 J
Page 1
Client Senple 1.0.#:
IEA Assigned EPA#:
Date sarrple red:
S~le Matrix:
Contract No.: 68-IJS-0045
Date Reported:
Pentanoic Acid
Unknown Alcohol
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Oichlorofluoro Methane
Unknown Acid
Propyl Cyclopropane
2-Heptanone
Acetaldehyde COOT)
Unknown Acid
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
EFFCLPVC.~Kl Revised 5/25/90
voes ANO CHRCIIIUM
DETECTED IN INNER TIER
INFLUENT/EFFLUENT SAIIPLES
HC/SHELBY, N.C.
WESTINGHOUSE PROJECT: 4124·85·050H
#2: !mer
Tier
Influent
HC139
2/9/90
WATER
3/20/90
50 J
30 J
100 J
30
500
40 J
400 J
••
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Page 2 I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Client Sanple 1.0,#:
!EA Assigned EPA#:
Date s8"1)le red:
S~le Matrix:
Contract No.: 68-'-18-0045
Date Reported:
TARGET COMPOIJNDS/ANALYTES
VOA TARGETED CCJIIPOUNOS (ug/l)
Acetone
2-Butanone
Benzene
2-Hexanone
Chlorobenzene
B/N TARGETED COMPOUNDS (ug/L}
Benzyl Alcohol
Di-n-butylphthalate
Oiethylphthalate
ACID EXTRACTABLE COMPOONOS (ug/L)
Phenol
2-Chlorophenol
4-Methylphenol
Benzoic Acid
PESTICIDES (ug/L)
Aldrin
PCBs (ug/l)
(none detected)
METALS (ug/L)
Al uni nun
Antimony
Arsenic
Bariun
Beryl l iun
caaniun
Calciun
Chromiun
Cabal t
Copper
Iron
Lead
Magnesiun
Manganese
Nickel
Potassiun
Silver
Sodiun
Thalliun
vanadiun
Zinc
Cyanide
EFFCLP.\JK1 Revised 5/25/90
TCL, TAL and TIC COMPOIJNDS/ANALYTES
DETECTED IN INNNER TIER
INFLUENT/EFFLUENT SAMPLES
HC/SHELBY, N.C.
I.JESTINGHOUSE PROJECT: 4124-85-0SOH
#8: Inner
Tier
Effluent
HC142
2/9/90
WATER
4/2/90
1200
5
160
10 J
83.1 B
12.6 B
6690
23.2 B
1750 N
2.4 B
24300
1220 N
4140 B
354000
173
Page 1
Client Sarrple 1.0.#:
IEA Assigned EPA#:
Date smrple red:
Saq:,le Matrix:
Contract No.: 68-WS-0045
Date Reported:
TENTATIVELY IOENTIFIEO COMPCXJNDS
VOA NON-TARGETED COMPOJNOS (ug/L)
(none detected)
BNA NON-TARGETED COMPOUNDS (ug/L)
2,2'-0xybis•Ethanol
2,2'·Bi·1,3-0ioxolane
Unknown Hydroxy Acid
Substituted Butanol
Unknown Acid
Unknown Alcohol
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
EFFCLP.IJK1 Revised 5/25/90
TCL, TAL and TIC CC»!PClJNDS/ANALYTES
DETECTED IN INNNER TIER
INFLUENT/EFFLUENT SAMPLES
HC/SHELBY, N.C.
~ESTINGHCXJSE PROJECT: 4124·85·050H
#8: Inner
Tier
Effluent
HC142
2/9/90
IJATER
4/2/90
20 J
20 J
60 J
20 J
100
20
70
10 J
9 J
10 J
10 J
20 J
50 J
8 J
10 J
10 J
10 J
200 J
9 J
10 J
Page 2
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
D
I
D
I
I
--- -- - - - - - -
CHROHIUH DETECTED
IN INFLUENT/EFFLUENT SAMPLES
HC/SHELBY, N.C.
WESTINGHOUSE PROJECT: 4124·65-0500
- - -
INNER 0T'-'IE~R'----OUTER 0T-"IE_,R.____
#2, COMBINED #8, EFFLUENT #1' COMBINED #7, EFFLUENT
STATION NUMBER: INFLUENT INFLUENT
-----------------------------------------------------. -------------------------------------
SAMPLE !EA CR CONC. IEA CR CONC. IEA CR CONC. IEA CR CONC.
DATE: SAHP # ( ug/ l ) SAHP # (uq/l) SAHP # (ug/ l) SAMP # (ug/l)
10/9/89 HCS073 29.0 HCS07S B0L HCS072 BDL HCS074 B0L
12/8/89 (not sa,rpled) HCS111 B0L HCS109 B0L HCS110 B0L
1/8, 10/90 HCS122 BDL HCS123 BDL HCSl 18 BDL HCS119 BDL
3/9/90 HCS165 39.2 HCS167 4.6 B HCS164 BDL HCS166 BDL
EFFCLPCR.WKl Revised 5/25/90
- - ---
Page 1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
lA EPA SAMPLE NO.
VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
HC139
Contract: 68-WB-0045 Lab Name: IEA
Lab Code: IEA Case No.: 619-123 SAS No.:
Matrix: (soil/water) WATER
SDG No.: HC124
Lab Sample ID:
Sample wt/vol: 5.000
Level: (low/med) LOW
% Moisture: not dee. 100.
Colwnn: (pack/cap) PACK
(g/mL) ML Lab File ID: 0215205
Date Received: 2/ 9/90
Date Analyzed: 2/15/90
Dilution Factor: 2.50
CAS NO. COMPOUND
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
(ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L Q
I
74-87-3-------CHLOROMETHANE _______ \
74-83-9-------BROMOMETHANE== _______ I
75-01-4-------VINYL CHLORIDE ______ \
75-00-3-------CHLOROETHANE~==-----\ 75-09-2-------METHYLENE CHLORIDE _____ \
67-64-1-------ACETONE ,,,--~~-----I
75-15-0-------CARBON DISULFIDE ______ \
75-35-4-------1,l-DICHLOROETHENE _____ I ·
75-34-3-------1,1-DICHLOROETHANE-,-,==-c,-,--I
540-59-0-------1,2-DICHLOROETHENE (TOTAL) I
67-66-3-------CHLOROFORM====------I
107-06-2-------1,2-DICHLOROETHANE. _____ I
78-93-3-------2-BUTANONE=-====~=----I
71-55-6-------1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE ___ I
56-23-5-------CARBON TETRACHLORIDE ____ !
108-05-4-------VINYL ACETATE ==-==-----1
75-27-4-------BROMODICHLOROMETHANE ____ I
I 78-87-5-------1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE =,----I
110061-01-5-------CIS-l,3-DICHLOROPROPENE I
I 79-01-6-------TRICHLOROETHENE ~~----1
124-48-1-------DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE~ ___ I
79-00-5-------1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE ___ I
I 71-43-2-------BENZENE ~---------1
110061-02-6-------TRANS-l,3-DICHLOROPROPENE I
7 5-2 5 - 2 - - -.-- --BROMOFORM --====c:==-----1
108-10-1-------4-METHYL-2-PENTANONE ____ I
591-78-6-------2-HEXANONE ________ I
127-18-4-------TETRACHLOROETHENE _____ I
79-34-5-------1,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
108-88-3-------TOLUENE
108-90-7-------CHLOROBENZENE
100-41-4-------ETHYLBENZENE _______ _
100-42-5-------STYRENE
1330-20-7-------XYLENE (TOTAL) ______ _
FORM I VOA
I
25. IU
25. I u
25. IU
25. I u
12. \U
470. I
12. I J
12. IU
12. IU
12. I u
12. \U
12. IU
51. I
12. IU
12. I u
25. I u
12. I u
12. I u
12. I u
12. IU
12. IU
12. IU
38. I
12. I u
12. I u
25. IU
25. IU
12. I u
12. I u.
12. I u
29. I
12. I u
12. I u
12. ! U
1 17( 1/87 Rev.
lE EPA SA!1PLE NO.
VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS
Contract: 68-W8-0045
HC139
Lab Name: IEA
Lab Code: IEA Case Wo.: 619-123 SAS No.:
Matrix: (soil/water) WATER
SDG No.: HC124
Lab Sample ID:
Sample wt/vol: 5.000
Level: (low/med) LOW
% Moisture: not dee. 100.
' Column: (pack/cap) PACK
(g/mL) ML Lab File ID: 0215205
Date Received: 2/ 9/90
Date Analyzed: 2/15/90
Dilution Factor: 2.50
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
Number TICs found: 10 (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L
I I
CAS NUMBER \ COMPOUND NAME I RT EST. CONC. I Q
I
I
\============ 1-!=====I
1. 75-07-0\ACETALDEHYDE (DOT) ____ _
2. - -I UNKNOWN ________ _
3. - - \ UNKNOWN ACID ______ _
4. - -I UNKNOWN ________ _
5. 123-72-8 \BUTANAL 6 . l O 9-9 9-9 I FURAN, T=ETRAHYD==-===-cR,-..,0,---------
I 1.05 100. J
I 2.23 500. J
I 3.03 I 30. J I
I 4.02 I 40. J
I 5.60 I 100. J
I 6.58 I 300. J
7. - - \ UNKNOWN --==-==------8. 4229-91-8 \ FURAN, 2-PROPYL-
9. 2415-72-7\CYCLOPROPANE, PRO~P=YL=------
I . 8.80 I 400. J
I 10.30 I 600. J
I 17. 63 I 50. J
10. 110-43-0\2-HEPTANONE I 17.87 I 30. J
11. ______ I ____________ _
12 . ______ I ____________ _
13 • ______ ! ____________ _
14 . ______ I ____________ _
lS . ______ I ____________ _
16. ______ I ____________ _
17 . ______ I ____________ _
18 . ______ I ____________ _
19. ______ I ____________ _
20 . ______ I ____________ _
21. ______ I ____________ _
22 . ______ I ____________ _
23. ______ I ____________ _
24. ______ I ____________ _
25 . ______ I ____________ _
26. ______ I ____________ _
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
! 1.
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
:.7. -------------------I I
28. I ------
29. ---------------------------------
30. ______ ---------------------------
FORM I VOA-TIC l/87 Rev.
1 177
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
lA EPA SAMPLE NO.
'JOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
HC139
Lab Name: IEA
Lab Code : I EA
Contract: 68-WB-0045
Case No.: 619-123 SAS No.: SDG No.: HC124
Lab Sample ID: Matrix: (soil/water) WATER
Sample wt/vol: 5.000
Level: (low/med) LOW
% Moisture: not dee. 100.
(g/mL) ML Lab File ID: 0215205
Date Received: 2/ 9/90
Date Analyzed: 2/15/90
Column: (pack/cap) PACK Dilution Factor: 2.50
CAS NO. COMPOUND
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
(ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L
74-87-3-------CHLOROMETHANE
74-83-9-------BROMOMETHANE
75-01-4-------VINYL CHLORID=E-------
75-00-3-------CHLOROETHANE
75-09-2-------METHYLENE CH~Lo=R-I~D~E-----
67-64-1-------ACETONE
75-15-0-------CARBON DISULFIDE _____ _
75-35-4-------1,1-DICHLOROETHENE ____ _
75-34-3-------1,1-DICHLOROETHANE ____ _
540-59-0-------1,2-DICHLOROETHENE (TOTAL)
67-66-3-------CHLOROFORM
107-06-2-------l,2-DICHLOR=O~E=THAN='""""E=-----
78-93-3-------2-BUTANONE
71-55-6-------1,1,1-TRICH~L~O~R~O~E=TH=AN~E=----
56-23-5-------CARBON TETRACHLORIDE ___ _
108-05-4-------VINYL ACETATE
75-27-4-------BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
1 78-87-5-------1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE ----
\10061-01-5-------CIS-l,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
\ 79-01-6-------TRICHLOROETHENE _____ _
124-48-1-------DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE ----79-00-5-------1,l,2-TRICHLOROETHANE
I 71-43-2-------BENZENE
il0061-02-6-------TRANS-l,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
75-25-2-------BROMOFORM
108-10-1-------4-METHYL-2-PENTANONE ___ _
591-78-6-------2-HEXANONE ________ _
127-18-4-------TETRACHLOROETHENE
79-34-5-------1,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
108-88-3-------TOLUENE
103-90-7-------CHLOROBENZENE
100-41-4-------ETHYLBENZENE _______ _
100-42-5-------STYRENE
1330-20-7-------XYLENE (TOTAL) -------
FORM I VOA
I
25. IU
25. \U
25. \U
25. IU
12. I u
470. \
12. I J
12. IU
12. \U
12. I u
12. \U
12. I u
51. l
12. \U
12. I u
25. I u
12. IU
12. I u
12. I u
12. I u
12. I u
12. I u
38. I
12. I u
12. I u
25. I u
25. I u
12. I u
12. I u
12. I u
2 9. I
12. I u
12. \U
12. ! U
Q
1/87 Rev.
lE EPA SAMPLE NO.
Lab Name: IEA
Lab Code: IEA
VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS
Contract: 68-WB-0045
Case No.: 619-123 SAS No.:
HC139
l•latrix: (soil/water) WATER
SDG No.: HC124
Lab Sample ID:
Sample wt/vol: 5.000
Level: (low/med) LOW
(g/mL) ML Lab File ID: 0215205
Date Received: 2/ 9/90
Date Analyzed: 2/15/90 % Moisture: not dee. 100.
C_olwnn: (pack/cap) PACK Dilution Factor: 2.50
Number TICS found: 10
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
(ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L
I I
CAS NUMBER \ COMPOUND NAME RT EST. CONC. I Q \
====\============ ==== =,=====\=====\
1. 75-07-0\ACETALDEHYDE (DOT) 1.05 100. \ J
2. - -I UNKNOWN 2. 23 500. I J
3. - -\UNKNOWN ACID 3.03 30. \ J
4 . - - \ UNKNOWN 4. 0 2 4 0 . I J
5. 123-72-8\BUTANAL 5.60 100. \ J
6. 109-99-9\FURAN, TETRAHYDRO-6.58 300. \ J
7. -\UNKNOWN 8.80 400. \ J
8. 4229-91-8\FURAN, 2-PROPYL-10.30 600. \ J
9. 2415-72-7\CYCLOPROPANE, PROPYL-17.63 50. \ J
10. 110-43-0\2-HEPTANONE 17.87 30. \ J
11. ______ I I __
12. I I __
13. I I __
14. I I __
lS. I I --16. I I --17. I I __ _
18. I I __
19. I I __ _ 20. I I __
21. I I __
22. I I __
23. ! _____________ --------------
2,. ! _____________ ------------
25. I _! _____________ _
2 6. I I _____________ _
:, . I I _____________ _
28. I I ____ -------:---2 9. I I ___________ , __ _
30. I I _____________ _
_______ I ! _____________ _
FORM I VOA-TIC 1/87 Rev.
1 177
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
lA EPA SAMPLE NO.
VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
HC142
3.b Name: IEA Contract: 68-WS-0045
c.,ab Code: IEA Case No.: 619-128 SAS No.:
I~atrix: !soil/water) WATER
SDG No.: HC142
Lab Sample ID:
Sample wt/vol: 5.000 (g/mL) ML Lab File ID: 0216207
Date Received: 2/ 9/90
Date Analyzed: 2/16/90
Level: (low/med) LOW
% Moisture: not dee. 100.
Column: (pack/cap) CAP Dilution Factor: 10.00
CAS NO. COMPOUND
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
(ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L
74-87-3-------CHLOROMETHANE ______ _
74-83-9-------BROMOMETHANE. _______ _J
75-01-4-------VINYL CHLORIDE ______ -'
75-00-3-------CHLOROETHANE
75-09-2-------METHYLENE cHLO==R=I=D=Ec------
67-64-1-------ACETONE
75-15-0-------CARBON DISULFIDE _____ _
75-35-4--~----l,l-DICHLOROETHENE ____ _
75-34-3-------1,1-DICHLOROETHANE ____ _
540-59-0-------1,2-DICHLOROETHENE (TOTAL)
67-66-3-------CHLOROFORM
107-06-2-------l,2-DICHLO=R07E~TH=AN----E-,-----
78-93-3-------2-BUTANONE ________ _
71-55-6-------1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE
56-23-5-------CARBON TETRACHLORIDE ___ _
108-05-4-------VINYL ACETATE ______ _
75-27-4-------BROMODICHLOROMETHANE ___ _
78-87-5-------1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE ___ _
il0061-01-5-------CIS-l,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
I 79-01-6-------TRICHLOROETHENE
I 124-48-1-------DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE ___ _
79-00-5-------1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE
I 71-43-2-------BENZENE
\10061-02-6-------TRANS-l,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
75-25-2-------BROMOFORM 108-10-1-------4-METHYL-2---PENT--AN-O_N_E ___ _
591-78-6-------2-HEXANONE ________ _
127-18-4-------TETRACHLOROETHENE
79-34-5-------1,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
108-88-3-------TOLUENE
108-90-7-------CHLOROBENZENE
100-41-4-------ETHYLBENZENE _______ _
100-42-5-------STYRENE
lJJ0-20-7-------XYLENE !TOTAL) ______ _
FORM I VOA
100.
100.
100.
100.
50.
1200.
50.
50.
50.
50.
50.
50.
100.
50.
50.
100.
50.
50.
50.
50.
50.
50.
50.
50.
50.
100.
100. so.
50.
50.
50.
50. so. so.
.. 1 ('\ .., ';
V:..,;..,,
Q
I
\U
\U
\U
\U
\U
I
\U
\U
\U
\U
\U
\U
\U
\U
\U
\U
\U
\U
IU
IU
IU
IU
\U
\U
\U
IU
\U
IU
IU
IU
\U
IU
IU
IU
I
1/87 Rev.
lE
VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS
EPA SAMPLE NO.
HC142
I
I
-3.b Name: IEA
. .J Code: IEA
Contract: 68-WB-0045 _______ \
Case No.: 619-128 SAS No.:
~atrix: (soil/water) WATER
Sample wt/vol: 5.000 (g/mL) ML
Level: (low/med) LOW
% Moisture: not dee. 100.
Column: (pack/cap) CAP
SDG No.: HC142
Lab Sample ID:
Lab File ID: 0216207
Date Received: 2/ 9/90
Date Analyzed: 2/16/90
Dilution Factor: 10.00
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
Number TICS found: 0 (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L
I I
I CAS NUMBER I COMPOUND NAME RT EST. CONC. Q
1---======1~-============ ==== ======= === I l. I _____________ , ___ _
I 2-------'-------------~----J I 3. ____________________
1
___ _
I 4---------------------'----~ I 5. ___________________ .J _____ ,
I 6. ______ ---------------'-----'
7. ______ --------------'----8. ___________________ ..;J ___ _
9. ___________________ .J _____ , I
10. ______ -----------------'
11. ______ -----------------
12. -----------------------
I
13. ------------------------------14. ---·
15. ------------------------_____ ___, 16. ---
17. ______ ---------------------------18. -----------------------______ J __ _
19 ·--------------------'-------------
20. --------------------' ----------' ---'
21. ______ ------------------------22. ---
23. --------------------· ----------24. ---
25. ------' ----------------~
26. ______ ------------------~
27. ______ --------------'----' -kO. -----------~--------' ____ ,
29. ______ --------------'-----· 30. ___________________ .J ____ ~
I I
I I
I
I
I
FORM I VOA-TIC 1/87 Rev.
/• 1 0 2 3
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
lB EPA SAMPLE NO.
SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
HC142
Contract: 68-W8-0045 b Name: IEA
:.ab Code : I EA Case No.: 619-128 SAS No.: SDG No. : HC142
Lab Sample ID: ,~atrix: ( soil/water) WATER
::;ample wt/vol: 1000.0
Level: (low/med) LOW
(g/mL) ML Lab File ID: 0223411
Date Received: 2/ 9/90
% Moisture: not dee. 100. dee. __ _
Extraction: (SepF/Cont/Sonc) CONT
GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) N pH: 6.0
Date Extracted:
Date Analyzed:
Dilution Factor:
2/10/90
2/23/90
1.00
CAS NO. COMPOUND
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
(ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L
I
108-95-2-------Phenol I
lll-44-4-------bis(2-Chloroethyl)ether I
95-57-8-------2-Chlorophenol _______ l
541-73-1-------1,3-Dichlorobenzene ____ I
106-46-7-------1,4-Dichlorobenzene ____ I
100-51-6-------Benzyl alcohol _______ !
95-50-1-------1,2-Dichlorobenzene ____ I
95-48-7-------2-Methylphenol _______ l
108-60-l-------bis(2-Chloroisopropyl)ether I
106-44-5-------4-Methylphenol ___ -,-~ __ I
621-64-7-------N-Nitroso-di-n-propylamine I
67-72-1-------Hexachloroethane _____ ~_I
98-95-3-------Nitrobenzene ________ l
78-59-1-------Isophorone_~ _______ I
88-75-5-------2-Nitrophenol -~-----1
105-67-9-------2,4-Dirnethylphenol _____ l
65-85-0-------Benzoic acid I
:11-91-l-------bis(2-Chloroethoxy)rnethane I
120-83-2-------2,4-Dichlorophenol _____ l
120-82-1-------1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene ___ l
91-20-3-------Naphthalene ________ I
106-47-8-------4-Chloroaniline ______ \
87-68-3-------Hexachlorobutadiene --,---I
59-50-7-------4-Chloro-3-methylphenol I
91-57-6-------2-Methylnaphthalene 77" ___ 1
77-47-4-------Hexachlorocyclopentadiene I
88-06-2-------2,4,6-Trichlorophenol ___ I
95-95-4-------2,4,5-Trichlorophenol ___ I
91-58-7-------2-Chloronaphthalene ____ \
BB-74-4-------2-Nitroaniline _______ l
131-11-3-------Dirnethylphthalate _____ I
208-96-8-------Acenaphthylene _______ l
606-20-2-------2,6-Di~itrotoluene -----
FORM I SV-1
10.
10.
10.
10.
10.
10.
10.
10.
10.
10.
10.
10.
10.
10.
10.
10.
10.
10.
10.
10.
10.
10.
10.
10.
10.
10.
10. so.
10.
50.
10.
10.
10.
2 013
Q
I I
\U I
\U I
\U I
\U I
!U I
IU I
IU I
IU I
\U I
\U I
IU I
IU I :u I
\U I
iU I
IU I
I J I
IU I
IU I
IU I
IU I
IU I
IU I
\U I
IU I :u I
IU I
IU I
\U I
\U I
IU I
IU I
IU I
I j
1/87 Rev.
lC EPA SAMPLE NO.
SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
HC142
Contract: 68-W8-0045 ·,ab Name: IEA
.ab Code: IEA Case No.: 619-128 SAS No.:
Matrix: (soil/water) WATER
SDG No. : HC142
Lab Sample ID:
Sample wt/vol: 1000.0 (g/mL) ML
Level: (low/med) LOW
% Moisture: not dee. 100. dee. __ _
Extraction: (SepF/Cont/Sonc) CONT
Lab File ID: 0223411
Date Received: 2/ 9/90
Date Extracted: 2/10/90
Date Analyzed: 2/23/90
GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) N pH: 6.0 Dilution Factor:
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
CAS NO. COMPOUND (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L
99-09-2-------3-Nitroaniline ______ _
83-32-9-------Acenaphthene ________ ,
51-28-5-------2,4~Dinitrophenol
100-02-7-------4-Nitrophenol
132-64-9-------Dibenzofuran _______ __,
121-14-2-------2,4-Dinitrotoluene ____ _
84-66-2-------Diethylphthalate ______ \
7005-72-3-------4-Chlorophenyl-phenylether \
86-73-7-------Fluorene _________ :~1
100-01-6-------4-Nitroaniline _______ \
534-52-1-------4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol_l
86-30-6-------N-Nitrosodiphenylamine (1) I
101-55-3-------4-Bromophenyl-phenylether -I
118-74-1-------Hexachlorobenzene ----~-\
87-86-5-------Pentachlorophenol _____ I
85-01-8-------?henanthrene ________ l
120-12-7-------Anthracene _________ l
84-74-2-------Di-n-butylphthalate ____ I
206-44-0-------Fluoranthene ________ l
129-00-0-------Pyrene ___ ~~------I
85-68-7-------Butylbenzylphthalate ____ l
91-94-1-------3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine ___ l
56-55-3-------Benzo(a)anthracene _____ l
218-01-9-------Chrysene ______ ~ ___ I
ll7-81-7-------bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate I
117-84-0-------Di-n-octylphthalate --1
205-99-2-------Benzo(b)fluoranthene ___ _
207-08-9-------Benzo(k)fluoranthene ___ _
50-32-8-------Benzo(a)pyrene ______ _
193-39-5-------Indeno(l,2,3-cd)pyrene __ _
53-70-3-------Dibenz(a,h)anthracene
191-24-2-------Benzo(g,h,i)perylene ___ _
l~) -cannot ne separated from diphenylamine
FORM I SV-2
50.
10.
50.
50.
10.
10.
160.
10.
10.
50.
50.
10.
10.
10.
50.
10.
10.
5.
10.
10.
10.
20.
10.
10.
10.
10.
10.
10.
10.
10.
10.
10.
1.00
Q
I
\U
\U
\U
\U
\U
IU
I
IU
\U
IU
\U
IU
iU
IU
\U
IU
IU
I J
'1U
IU
\U
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
\U
IU
!U
IU
iU
IU
1/87 Rev.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
:..F EPA SA."'!PLE NO.
SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS
HC142
Name: :EA Contract: 68-W8-0045
-...i.b Cc,de: IEA Case No.: 619-128 SAS No.:
,,latrix: (soil/water) WATER
Sample wt/vol: 1000.0 (g/mL) ML
(low/med) LOW
% Moisture: not dee. 100. dee. --
Extraction: (SepF/Cont/Soncl CONT
SDG No. : HC142
Lab Sample ID:
Lab File ID: 0223411
Date Received: 2/ 9/90
Date Extracted: 2/10/90
Date Analyzed: 2/23/90
GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) N pH: 6.0 Dilution Factor: 1. 00
Number TICs found: 20
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
(ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L
I I
CAS NUMBER I COMPOUND NAME I -RT EST. CONC.
1.
3 '
4.
J.
6.
7,
8.
9.
1.0. ' . J..l..
..:.....: .
.. ..,, . ~s.
:6,
:.7.
:. 3 .
19.
===\ ==============! -\UNKNOWN _________ \ 9.30
I UNKNOWN _________ ! 9. 42
-\UNKNOWN HYDROXY ACID ____ \ 10.35
-I UNKNOWN I 10 . 4 3
111-46-6\Ethanol, 2,2'-oxybis-\ 10.68
6705-89-1\2,2'-Bi-l,3-dioxolane \ 13.50
-I UNKNOWN I 13. 58
-I UNKNOWN I 13. 73
I UNKNOWN I 14. 50
-!Substituted Butanol I 15.02
-I UNKNOWN I 15, 40
-I UNKNOWN ACID I 17. 00
I UNKNOWN I "9 . 2 3
IUN1<NOWN I 20.77
-I UN1<NOWN ALCOHOL I 2 2 . 0 8
-!UNKNOWN I 23.18
-I UNKNOWN I 23. 30
- I UNKNOWN I 26. 88
- I UNKNOWN I 3 5 . 8 S
- ! UNKNOWN I 3 6. 8 S
70.
10.
60.
9.
20.
20.
10.
10.
20.
20. so.
100.
8.
10.
20.
10.
10.
200.
9.
10.
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
Q
"a. ______ I I ___________ , ___ ,
7 -I I ···-----------'--------'--~ "0. ------________________ \ ____ , ______ _, ___ ,
24. !
.:..:i. ------______________ ! ____ , ------___ ,
"C. ------______________ ! -----------__ _,
27. ------______________ ! --------------
~o. ______ ------------------'------~---' 29. _____ _
;. o. ------
FORM I SV-TIC 2 OlS 1/87 Rev.
lD EPA SAMPLE NO.
PESTICIDE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
HC142
.b Name: IEA Contract: 68-WS-0045
:..ab Code: I EA Case No.: 619-128 SAS No.: SDG No.: HC142
Lab Sample ID: I·\a tr :..x: (soil/water) WATER
Sample wt/vol: 1000. (g/mL)ML
Level: (low/med) LOW
% Moisture: not dec.100. dee.
Extraction: (SepF/Cont/Sonc) CONT
GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) N pH:
0.
6.0
-Lab File ID: DB5A5790
Date Received: 2/ 9/90
Date Extracted: 2/10/90
Date Analyzed: 2/20/90
Dilution Factor: 1.00
::AS NO. COMPOUND
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
(ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L Q
I
319-84-6-----alpha-BHC .050 \U
319-85-7-----beta-BHC .050 \U
319-86-8-----delta-BHC .050 \U
58-89-9-----gamma-BHC .050 \U
76-44-8-----Heptachlor .050 \U
309-00-2-----Aldrin .050 \U
1024-57-3-----Heptachlor epoxide .050 iU
959-9B-B-----Endosulfan I .050 IU
60-57-1-----Dieldrin .10 IU
72-55-9-----4,4'-DDE .10 \U
72-20-B-----Endrin .10 IU
)3213-65-9-----Endosulfan II .10 iU
72-54-B-----4,4'-DDD .10 :u
1031-07-8-----Endosulfan sulfate .10 iU
50-29-3-----4,4'-DDT .10 iU
72-43-5-----Methoxychlor .50 \U
53494-70-5-----Endrin ketone .10 \U
5103-71-9-----alpha-Chlordane .50 iU
5103-74-2-----gamma-Chlordane .so iU
8001-35-2-----Toxaphene 1.0 1.U
12674-11-2-----Aroclor-1016 .so IU
ill04-28-2-----Aroclor-l221 .50 IU
cll41-16-5-----Aroclor-1232 .so \U
53469-21-9-----Aroclor-1242 .50 iU
12672-29-6-----Aroclor-1248 .50 IU
11097-69-1-----Aroclor-1254 l. 0 IU
11096-82-5-----Aroclor-1260 l.O !U
FORM I PEST 3 ooit 1/87 Rev.
I
I
I
I
II
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~atrix (soil/water): WATER
._evel (low/mec) LOW
·; Soli.ds: 0.0
':AMPLE NO.
riCS142
Lab Sample ID: 619-128-1
Client ID: ~8 INNER EFFLUENT
Date Received: 02/09/90
Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg dry weight): UG/L
:cAS No.
:7429-QO-S
:7440-36-0
:7440-38-'J
:7440-39-3
:7440-41-7
:7440-43-9
:7440-70-2
:7440-47-3
:7440-48-4
'7440-50-6
'7439-59-6
, 7 439-C.'.?-.!.
:7439-0~-4
Analyte
; Aluminum
;Antimony
;Arsenic
:sarium
:servllium
;Cadmium
:calcium
:chromium
;cobalt
:copper
': :·on
,Leac
;Magnesium
7~29-C6-S '~anganese
,~~g-0 ~-~ ~er=~r·,
:'440-0:::-i:, : ;-.1 ici•.el
744Q-0q_7 Potassium
7782-4Q-~ ~~leniL~
'7440-::-~ Silver
7~4,)-___ -~ ~ocium
1 744(1--=-,--, 1 -:-~.al 1.:.L!m
7440-62-: 1 '✓anaaium
,7440-~6-~ ;:~iwn_c~---
_______ : c,.,a.ni ce
' ' :concentration:c: Q
---------' _, ____ , _, -----~=~~:§.: D
------'4=~~: w.: ' 2-' -------~~: v_: W~---_F_, _____ _.1~2...,__.6~: §.: I _0 _,
_____ _,o..._.,_7_,o~: !::!.: ____ :_o_,
______ ..,3~=-: \d.: : e_:
-----~6~6~9..,0~, _, ____ ' _P_,
_______ 4-'--' . ..,1~: \:.L: : 2._;
_____ _,l'-0~.-'7~; \d.: '_o_,
-----~:~3~.-'=~: g_: ----p
_____ _,1~7~-~s..,o~, _: ·~·i ___ _
-------'=~-..,._4_: ~: ----
------="-"4":;"'-.sOc..O~, _, ___ _
i::c· 1-'~'"----------'·.:c..'~-~:"o'-._: ~: ----------'''"s~--o~: ~: ___ _
______ 4~1 _4_0~1 !;_ I ___ _
'' = ~'----
------~~-:..::...I----
----~:::~· ;5_4_' ,~-,~c~"=~, _: _. ___ _
------~-.. -..,o'-: \:l: ----= I I I I
------~-'-'-~• :L' ----j/7
1 002
7/85
ENVIROFORMS/CLP 788
1
SAMPLE NO.
INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
Lab Name: IEA, INC.
Lab Code: IEA
CASE NO : (,If-/41,,
SDG No.: HCS158
HCS165
Matrix (soil/water): WATER
Lab Sample ID: 619-142-2
Client ID: #2-INNER TIER COMB. INFL.
Level ( low /med) : LOW Date Received: 03/09/90
% Solids: 0. 0
Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg dry weight): UG/L
CAS No.
7429-90-5
2440-3§-0
744Q-38-2
,744Q-39-3
:7440-4J.-7
[7440-43-9
J744Q-70-2
:744Q-47-3
J7440-48-4
l7440-50-8
:7439-89-6
J7439-92-1
J7439-95-4
l7439 96-5
:7439-97-6
l7440-02-0
l7440-09-7
:7782-49-2
:7440-22-4
l7440-23-5
J7440 28-0
:7440-62-2
l7440-66-6
ilor Before: BROWN
r After: YELLOW
Jmments:
' ' ' ' ' ' ' Analyte :concentration:c ' ' ' ' ,_
:Aluminum ' ,_
'Antimgnz
A;c::ienic
Bs;c: iym
Be;c:zl.l.i.um _,
Csdmil.!111
CslciU!]
,cb;c:gmiym 39,2 ,_
:cobslt I ,_
:copper I ,_
: Iron ' ,_
JLead I ,_
:Magnesium I ,_
:Manganese ' ,_
:Mercurz ' ,_
lNickel ' ,_
lPots1,ssium ' ,_,
Selenium ' ' ,_,
Silver ' ' ,_,
Sodium ' ' ,_,
Thallium ' ' ,_,
Vanadium ' ' ,_,
Zinc I ' ,_,
czanide ' I ,_,
Clarity Before: CLEAR
Clarity After: CLEAR
#2-INNER TIER COMB. INFL.
FORM I -IN
' ' ' ' Q :M ' ' ' ' ,_,
: .!IB
: IIB
: .!IB
l .!IB
:NR
: .!IB
l .!IB
l.L
l .!IB
JNR
:NR
JNR
:NR
l .!IB
l .!IB
JNR
: N.R:
lNR: :NR:
]NR: :NR:
[NR: :NR:
lNR:
Texture:
Artifacts:
1 009
7/88
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
ENVIROFORMS/CLP 788
1
INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
C.A~ii. ,Jo: /, l'i -1 '4-1,
S DG No.: HCS158
SAMPLE NO.
HCS167
Lab Name: IEA, INC.
Lab Code: IEA
Matrix (soil/water): WATER
Lab Sample ID: 619-142-4
Client ID: #8-INNER EFFLUENT
Level (low/med):
% Solids:
LOW
0.0
Date Received: 03/09/90
Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg dry weight): UG/L
I I I I I I I I I I I I
:cAs No. : Analyte Concentration:c: Q :M :
I I I I I 1 '-----·--------------,_, ___ , _,
:7429-90-5 :Aluminum :_: :IIB
:7440-36-o :Antimony :_: :HR
:7440-38-2 :Arsenic :_: :NR
:1440-39-3 :Barium :_: :IIB
:1440-41-1 :Beryllium :_: :IIB
:7440-43-9 :cadmium :_: :fill.
:1410-10-2 :calcium :_: :IIB
7440-47-3 :chromium 4 6 :~: :L
7440-48-4 :cobalt :_: :HR
7440-50-8 :copper :HR
7439-89-6 'Iron :NR
7439-92-1 Lead fill.
7439-95 4 Magnesium HR
7439-96-5 Manganese fill.
7439-97-6 Mercury HR
7440-02-0 Nickel NR
:7440-09-7 ,Potassium ' NR
:1782-49-2 :selenium ==============:=!====== NR :7440-22 4 :silver -------:-:---NR : 7 4 40 2 3-s : .. s~o..,d,.,i..,u.,m.,_ __________ , _, ___ NR
:7440-28-0 :Thallium _______ :_: ___ fill.
:7440 62 2 :vanadium _______ :_: ___ NR
: 7 440-66-6 : .. z_.i,..n..,,c~--_______ : _: ___ fill.:
-----: Cyanide -------: _] ___ : NR 1
olor Before: YELLOW
r After: COLORLESS
Clarity Before: CLOUDY
Clarity After: CLEAR
Texture:
Artifacts:
I :omments:
1 011
I #8-INNER EFFLUENT FORM I -IN 7/88
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
5050H190
APPENDIX IV
SBR/FILTER PRESS SLUDGE ANALYSES
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Sludge I .D.:
Caments:
!EA Assigned EPA#:
Date saq,le red:
S~le Matr;x:
Contract No.: 68-"'8-0045
Date Reported:
TARGET CCJIPCUNDS/ANALYTES
VOA TARGETED CCfi!PQJNOS (ug/L)
Methylene Chloride
Acetone
Chloroform
2~Butanone
8/N TARGETED Cl'.JIIPCUNDS (ug/L)
Phenol
2-Chlorophenol
4-Methylphenol
b1s(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate
Benzoic Acid
Oi-n-butylphthalate
ACID EXTRACTABLE CCJIIPWNDS (ug/l)
(none detected)
PESTICIDES (ug/l)
(none detected)
PCBs (ug/l)
(none detected)
METALS Cug/Ll
Al uni run
Antimony
Arsenic
Baril.Ill
Beryll iun
Cachliun
Calci1.111
Chromi un
Cobalt c_.,
Iron
Lead
Magnesiun
Manganese
Mercury
Nick.el
Potassiun
Seleniun
Silver
Sodiun
Thall iun
Vanadi un
Zinc
Cyanide
SLGCLP.wKi Revised 5/23/90
TCL, TAL and TIC CCJIIPOJNOS/ANALYTES
DETECTED IN SLUDGE SA14PLES
HC/SHELBY, N.C.
WESTINGIIWSE PROJECT: 4124·85·050H
SBR llASTE
SLUDGE
CLP Lab
HC141
2/9/90
llATER
2/15/90
280
84
22900
48.5 B
2.5 B
4370
0.97 B
15.9
123000
254
2140
T37
114000
34.2
91200
563000 E
650
8990
2.0 BS
96.6
366000
16.2 B
4280
21.2 N
SBR llASTE
SLUDGE
CLP lab
HC141(TCLPJ
2/9/90
llATER
(not MIi)
(not rvi)
(not r1.n)
(not run)
(not r111)
(not run)
(not run)
(not run)
(not run)
(not run)
(not run)
(not run)
(not run)
(not run)
(not run)
(not run)
(not run)
(not run)
(not run)
(not run)
(not run)
FILTER PRESS
SLUDGE
CLPLib
_ (TCLPJ
2/9/90
llATER
(not rlll)
(not rui)
(not run)
(not run)
(not run)
(not run)
(not run)
(not run)
(not run)
(not run)
(not run)
(not run)
(not run)
(not run)
(not run)
(not run)
(not run)
(not run)
(not run)
(not run)
(not run)
Page 1
Sludge 1.0.:
Conments:
IEA Assigned EPA#:
Date saq,le red:
S811l)le Matrix:
Contract No.: 68-WS-0045
Date Reported:
TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPaJNDS
VOA NON-TARGETED CCJ4POJNDS {ug/l)
Substituted Cyclohexane
(1-Methylethyl) Cyclohexene
Unknown Cycloalkane
Unknown
3-Methyl Nonene
Unknown Hydrocarbon
Substituted Cyclohexane
Unknown
Ethenyl Ester Formic Acid
Unknown
Unknown Alcohol
Unknown
Unknown
Tetrahydro Furen
3·Methyl 2-Butanone
BNA NON-TARGETED COMPOUNDS (ug/L)
Unknown Acid
Unknown
Unknown Acid
Hexanoic Acid (DOT)
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
unknown
Unknown
Benzeneacetic Acid
unknown Acid
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Substituted Jndole
Unknown
Hexadecanoic Acid
Unknown
Unknown Alcohol
Unknown
Substituted Cyclohexane
Unknown Acid
Unknown
Unknown Alcohol
Unknown Alkane
Unknown
Unknown Alkane
Unknown
Unknown Acid
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown Aldehyde
Unknown
Unknown
SLGCLP.1,11(1 Revised 5/23/90
TCL, TAL and TIC COMPCXJNDS/ANALYTES
DETECTED IN SLUDGE SA14PLES
Ht/SHELBY, N.C.
IIESTINGHOUSE PROJECT: 4124·85-0SOH
SBR WASTE
SLUDGE
CLP lab
HC141
2/9/90
WATER
2/15/90
20 J
20 J
200 J
200 J
SBR WASTE
SLUDGE
CLP Lab
HC141 (TCLP)
2/9/90
WATER
FILTER PRESS
~ CLP Lab
(TCLP)
2/9/90
WATER
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Page 2 I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Sludge 1.0.:
Conments:
lEA Assigned EPA#:
Date s.,..:,le red:
Saq,le Matrix:
Contract No.: 68-"'8-0045
Date Reported:
unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown Acid
Unknown Acid
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
unknown
Unknown
Crotonic Acid (DOT)
Unknown Acid
unknown
Butyrolactone
Unknown
Unknown Acid
unknown
2,2'-oxybis-Ethanol
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown Acid
Ethyl Benzoic Acid
Unknown
1H·lndole-2,3·dione
Unknown
1H-Jndole·3-carboxaldehyde
Unknown Acid
Isocrotonic Acid
Pentanoic Acid
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
unknown Acid
Unknown Aromatic
unknown Acid
Unknown
Dodecanoic Acid
Tetradecanoic Acid
Unknown Acid
Unknown
Unknown Acid
Octadecanoic Acid
Butanoic acid
Unknown Hydroxy Ac d
Unknown Hydroxy Ac d
Unknown Hydroxy Ac d
Unknown Ester
Unknown Acid
2,2-0imethyl-1-0ctanol
Unknown Hydrocarbon
3,7-0imethyt-Nonane
SLGCLP.WK1 Revised 5/23/90
TCL, TAL and TIC COMPWNDS/ANALYTES
DETECTED IN SLUDGE SAMPLES
HC/SHELBY, M.C.
IIESTIMGHaJSE PROJECT: 4124·85·050H
SBR WASTE
SLUDGE
CLP Lab
HC141
2/9/90
WATER
2/15/90
500 J
1000 J
300 J
200 J
8000 J
1000 J
2000 J
2000 J
400 J
800 J
90 J
80 J
80 J
SBR WASTE
SLUDGE
CLP Lab
HC141(TCLP)
2/9/90
WATER
FILTER PRESS
~ CLP Lab
(TCLP)
2/9/90
WATER
Page 3
Sludge l .D.:
Comnents:
IEA Assigned EPA#:
Date s~le red:
S~le Matrix:
Contract No.: 68·W8·0045
Date Reported:
Unknown
Unknown
unknown
Unknown
Unknown
SLGCLP.Wl(1 Revised 5/23/90
TCL, TAL and TJC cc»IPOJNOS/ANALYTES
DETECTED IN Slll>GE SAMPLES
HC/SHELBY, N.C.
IIESTINGHctJSE PROJECT: 4124-85-0SOH
SBR \JASTE
SLUDGE
CLP lab
HC141
2/9/90
WATER
2/15/90
10000 J zoo J
100 J
80 J
300 J
SBR \JASTE
SLUDGE
CLP Lab
HC141(TCLP)
2/9/90
WATER
FILTER PRESS
SLUDGE
CLP Lab
(TCLP)
2/9/90
WATER
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Page 4 I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
lA EPA SAMPLE NO.
VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
HC141
Contract: 68-W8-0045 Lab Name: IEA
wab Code: IEA Case No.: 619-123 SAS No.:
Matrix: (soil/water) WATER
SDG No.: HC124
Lab Sample ID:
Sample wt/vol: 5.000
Level: (low/med) LOW
% Moisture: not dee. 100.
Column: (pack/cap l CAP
(g/mL) ML Lab File ID: 0215209
Date Received: 2/ 9/90
Date Analyzed: 2/15/90
Dilution Factor: 2.00
CAS NO. COMPOUND
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
(ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L
I
I 74-87-3-------CHLOROMETHANE 20.
I 74-83-9-------BROMOMETHANE 20.
I 75-01-4-------VINYL CHLORIDE 20.
I 75-00-3-------CHLOROETHANE I 20.
I 75-09-2-------METHYLENE CHLORIDE I 10.
I 67-64-1-------ACETONE I 280.
I 75-15-0-------CARBON DISULFIDE I 10.
I 75-35-4-------1,l-DICHLOROETHENE I 10.
I 75-34-3-------1,l-DICHLOROETHANE I 10.
I 540-59-0-------1,2-DICHLOROETHENE (TOTAL) _I 10.
I 67-66-3-------CHLOROFORM 10.
I 107-06-2-------1,2-DICHLOROETHANE I 10.
I 78-93-3-------2-BUTANONE I 20.
I 71-55-6-------1,1,l-TRICHLOROETHANE I 10.
I 56-23-5-------CARBON TETRACHLORIDE I 10.
I t08-05-4-------VINYL ACETATE I 20.
I 75-27-4-------BROMODICHLOROMETHANE I 10.
I 78-87-5-------1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE I 10.
\10061-01-5-------CIS-l,3~DICHLOROPROPENE __ I 10.
I 79-01-6-------TRICHLOROETHENE I 10.
I 124-48-1-------DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE I 10.
I 79-00-5-------1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE I 10.
I 71-43-2-------BENZENE I 10.
\10061-02-6-------TRANS-l,3-DICHLOROPROPENE _I 10.
I 75-25-2-------BROMOFORM I 10.
I 108-10-1-------4-METHYL-2-PENTANONE I 20.
I 591-78-6-------2-HEXANONE I 20.
I 127-18-4-------TETRACHLOROETHENE I 10.
I 79-34-5-------1,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE _I 10.
I 108-88-3-------TOLUENE I 10.
I 108-90-7-------CHLOROBENZENE I 10.
I 100-41-4-------ETHYLBENZENE I 10.
I 100-42-5-------STYRENE 10.
I 1330-20-7-------XYLENE (TOTAL) 10.
!
FORM I VOA 1 ,, 1 ~ :.. J
Q
I
\U
\U
\U
\U
\U
I
[U
\U
\U
\U
\U
\U
\U
\U
\U
\U
[U
\U
\U
\U
\U
\U
\U
\U
[U
[U
\U
\U
\U
IU
\U
\U
IU
\U
I
1/87 Rev.
lE EPA SAMPLE NO.
Lab Name: IEA
,..ab Code: IEA
VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS
Contract: 68-WS-0045
Case No.: 619-123 SAS No.:
HC141
Matrix: (soil/water) WATER
SDG No.: HC124
Lab Sample ID:
Sample wt/vol: 5.000 (g/mL) ML
I..evel: (low/med) LOW
Lab File ID: 0215209
Date Received: 2/ 9/90
Date Analyzed: 2/15/90 % Moisture: not dee. 100.
Column: (pack/cap) CAP Dilution Factor: 2.00
Number TICs found: 2
I
CAS NUMBER \ COMPOUND NAME
=======\
. CONCENTRATION UNITS:
(ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L
RT EST. CONC.
1. 109-99-9\FURAN, TETRAHYDR0-
2. 563-80-4 \ 2-BUTANONE, 3-METHYL==------
6.50
10.22
20.
20.
J
J
Q
3. ______ I ________________________ _
4. ---
5. ______ I _____________ )----:-------'--~ 6. ______ l. ____________ _, ___ __, _____ _, __ -
7. ______ I _____________ , ____ , ______ , ___ :
8. ______ l ____________ --!----'-------'--~I
9. ______ I _____________ , ____ --------'---:\
10. ------': --------------'----: ______ __, __ __.\ 11. ______ I _____________ , ____ , ______ , ___ :
12. ______ I ____________ __, ___ _, _____ __, __ ~
13. ______ I __________________ , _______ , ___ :
14. ______ l ________________ _, _____ _, __ ~I
15. ______ I _____________ , __________ _, ___ ,\
16. ______ l ________________ __, _____ _, __ _,1
17. ______ l _______________________ , __ _,
18. ______ l ____________ _i _________ _, __ _,
19. ______ I _________________ ------'--~ 20. ______ 1 _____________ , ___ __, _____ _, __ _,
21. ______ l ____________ _, ___________ j ___ ,
22. ______ I _________________ :-------'--~
23. ______ I _________________ _, ______ __, ___ l
24. ______ I I
25. _____ I l
26. ______ I I
27 • ______ \ I
28. ______ \ I
29. ______ I l
30. ______ \ I
_______\ I
FORM I VOA-TIC 1/87 Rev.
1 216
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
lB EPA SAMPLE NO.
SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS ~ATA SHEET
HC141
Contract: 68-WB-0045
..... ab
Name: :EA
Coae: IEA Case No.: 619-123 SAS No.: · SDG No.: HC124
:-latrix: I soil/water) WATER Lab Sample ID:
Sample wt/vol: 1000.0 (g/mL) ML Lab File ID: 0223406
Level: (low/med) LOW Date Received: 2/ 9/90
0 Moisture: not dee. 100. dee. Date Extracted: 2/10/90 "
Extraction: (SepP/Cont/Sonc) CONT Date Analyzed: 2/23/90
GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) N pH: 6.0 Dilution Factor: 1.00
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
CAS NO. COMPOUND (ug/L or ug/Kg)
I
108-95-2-------Phenol~~--,-.,...,.-,----I
lll-44-4-------bis(2-Chloroethyl)ether I
95-57-8-------2-Chlorophenol _______ l
541-73-1-------1,3-Dichlorobenzene ____ I
106-46-7-------1,4-Dichlorobenzene ____ I
100-51-6-------Benzyl alcohol _______ !
95-50-1-------1,2-Dichlorobenzene ____ I
95-48-7-------2-Methylphenol __ ~,-,---,--I
108-60-l-------bis(2-Chloroisopropyl)ether I
106-44-5-------4-Methylphenol ___ ~~--I
621-64-7-------N-Nitroso-di-n-propylamine I
67-72-1-------Hexachloroethane _____ ==I
98-95-3-------Nitrobenzene ________ l
78-59-l-------Isophorone_~-------
88-75-5-------2-Nitrophenol
:oS-67-9-------2,4-Dimethylphenol ____ _
65-85-0-------Benzoic acid-,-,,--,--,-,,---
1:l-91-l-------bis(2-Chloroethoxy)methane
120-83-2-------2,4-Dichlorophenol ____ _
120-82-1-------1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene ---91-20-3-------Naphthalene
106-47-8-------4-Chloroaniline
87-68-3-------Hexachlorobutadiene
59-50-7-------4-Chloro-3-methylphenol
91-57-6-------2-Methylnaphthalene
77-47-4-------Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
88-06-2-------2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
95-95-4-------2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
91-58-7-------2-Chloronaphthalene
88-74-4-------2-Nitroanil.ine ______ _
31-11-3-------Dimethylphthalate
08-96-3-------Acenaphthylene ______ _
06-~Q-~-------2,6-Dinitrotoluene -----
FORM I SV-1
UG/L
I· 2
Q
I
10. \U
10. IU
10. IU
10. IU
10. \U
10. IU
10. IU
10. IU
10. IU
10. IU
10. IU
10. :u
10. IU ::.o. IU
10. IU
10. IU
62. I
10. !U
10. IU
10. IU
10. !U
10. IU
10. IU
::.o. !U
10. :u
1.. 0 . IU ::.o. iU
so. IU
: 0. :u
50. IU
10. IU
10. :u
lJ. '. J
I
1/87
068
Rev.
lC EPA SAMPLE NO.
SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
HC141
:.ab Name: IEA Contract: 68-WB-0045
~ab Code: IEA Case No.: 619-123 SAS No.: SDG No.: HC124
i·latrix: lsoil/waterl WATER i.ab Sample ID:
Sample wt/vol: 1000.0
:...eve l: (low/med) LOW
' (g/mLl ML Lab File ID: 0223406
Date Received: 2/ 9/90
\ Moisture: not dee. 100. dee. __ _ Date Extracted: 2/10/90
2/23/90
1.00
Extraction: (SepF/Cont/Soncl CONT Date Analyzed:
GPC Cleanup: (Y/Nl N pH: 6. 0 Dilution Factor:
CAS NO. COMPOUND
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
(ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L
I
99-09-2-------3-Nitroaniline _______ l
83-32-9-------Acenaphthene ________ .l
51-28-5-------2,4-Dinitrophenol _____ I
100-02-7-------4-Nitrophenol _______ I
132-64-9-------Dibenzofuran ________ l
121-14-2-------2,4-Dinitrotoluene _____ l
84-66-2-------Diethylphthalate ______ l
7005-72-3-------4-Chlorophenyl-phenylether I
86-73-7-------Fluorene ·-1
100:...01-6-------4-Nitroaniline _______ l
534-52-1-------4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol_l
86-30-6-------N-Nitrosodiphenylamine (l)_l
101-55-3-------4-Bromophenyl-phenylether _I
118-74-1-------Hexachlorobenzene _____ I
87-86-5-------Pentachlorophenol _____ I
85-01-8-------Phenanthrene ________ l
~20-12-7-------Anthracene __ -,-______ I
84-74-2-------Di-n-butylphthalate ____ I
206-44-0-------Fluoranthene ________ l
129-00-0-------Pyrene ___________ l
35-68-7-------Butylbenzylphthalate ____ l
91-94-1-------3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine ---56-55-3-------Benzo(a)anthracene -----218-01-9-------Chrysene-.,...,...--------I ll7-8l-7-------bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate I
117-84-0-------Di-n-octylphthalate ---~-
205-99-2-------Benzo(b)fluoranthene ___ _
:07-08-9-------Benzo(klfluoranthene ----50-32-8-------Benzo(a)pyrene -------193-39-5-------Indeno(l,2,]-cd)pyrene ---53-70-3-------Dibenz(a,h)anthracene
:91-24-2-------Benzo(g,h,i)perylene ----
lll -Cannot be separated from diphenylamine
FORM I SV-2
50.
10.
50.
50.
10.
10.
10.
10.
10.
50.
50.
10.
10.
10.
50.
::.o.
10.
10.
10.
10.
'-0 .
20.
l 0.
:. Cl •
10.
l 0.
l0.
1().
:. 0 .
10.
10.
10.
! 2 Q69
Q
I
IU
IU
IU
IU
\U
\U
IU
IU
IU
IU
\U
IU
IU
IU
\U
IU
IU
IU
\U
IU
IU
IU
IU
\U
IU
IU
IU
!U
IU
iU
\U
IU
l/87 Rev.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
'..F
:EMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS
Contract: 6B-WB-0045
EPA SAMPLE NO.
HC141
~d= Cocie: I EA Case No.: 619-123 SAS No.:
,·latrix: (soil/water) WATER
SDG No. : HC124
Lab Sample ID:
Sample Wt/vol: 1000.0 (g/mL) ML
I r..evel: (low/med) LOW
Lab File ID: 0223406
Date Received: 2/ 9/90
Date Extracted: 2/10/90
Date Analyzed: 2/23/90
% Moisture: not dee. 100. dee. __ _
I Extraction: (SepF/Cont/Sonc) CONT
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) N pH: 6. 0 Dilution Factor:
Nwnber TICs found: 20
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
(ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L
I
CAS NUMBER I COMPOUND NAME
\===============\
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
l.!..
13.
107-92-6\Butanoic acid
-\UNKNOWN ACID_~------503-64-0\Isocrotonic acid _____ _
-\UNKNOWN ACID _______ _
109-52-4\Pentanoic acid~-~=-----
-\UNKNOWN HYDROXY ACID ___ _
-\UNKNOWN HYDROXY ACID ___ _
-\UNKNOWN HYDROXY ACID ___ _
-\UNKNOWN HYDROXY ACID ___ _
l42-62-l\Hexanoic acid (DOT)
\UNKNOWN ACID _______ _
- I UNKNOWN ESTER
-\UNKNOWN ACID _______ _
:. 4 . -! UNKNOWN ESTER
15. 91-56-5\lH-Indole-2,3-dione ____ I
~6. 4B7-89-B\lH-Indole-3-carboxaldehyde_\
i 7. -I UNKNOWN __________ \
l3. 57-10-3\Hexadecanoic acid _____ I
l 3. -I UNKNOWN __________ \
20. 57-11-4\Octadecanoic acid _____ I
RT EST.
8.98
9.68
9.93
10.00
10.23
11.03
11.18
11. 32
11. 38
11.65
13.90
'..4.10
17.22
19.97
22.32
23.77
24.80
25.00
26.90
27. 03
1.00
CONC. Q
6000. J
B000. J
900. J
500. J
400. J
1000. J
1000. J
1000. J
400. J
100. ! J
200. J
200. J
1000. J
700. J
200. J
800. J
200. J
400. J
300. J
200. J
2 l. ______ I ______________ I _____________ _
2 :i: =========== --========================== -----------' ---,, ----'------~---.'. ----------------------------------
2 S. ______ ----------------------------:s. ______ ---------------------------.:.,. _____ _
'.::3. ----------------------------------
23. ---------------------------------
?O. ______ -----------------------------
FORM I SV-TIC .., QiO .. l/87 Rev.
lB EPA SAMPLE NO.
SE.!~IVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
HC141 ~£.
,b Name: IEA
I..ab Code: IEA
Coni:ract: 68-WB-0045
Case No.: 619-123 SAS No.:
:•lai:rix: (soil/water) WATER
Sample wt/vol: l000.0 (g/rnL) ML
Level: (low/med) LOW
% Moisture: not dee. 100. dee. __ _
Extraction: (SepF/Cont/Sonc) CONT
SDG No.: HC124
Lab Sample ID:
Lab File ID: 0223405
Date Received: 2/ 9/90
Date Extracted: 2/14/90
Date Analyzed: 2/23/90
GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) N pH: 6.0 Dilution Factor: 1.00
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
CAS NO. COMPOUND (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L
I 108-95-2-------Phenol ___________ l
lll-44-4-------bis(2-Chloroethyl)ether __ I
95-57-8-------2-Chlorophenol _______ l
541-73-1-------1,3-Dichlorobenzene ____ I
106-46-7-------1,4-Dichlorobenzene ____ I
100-51-6-------Benzyl alcohol _______ \
95-50-1-------1,2-Dichlorobenzene ____ I
95-48-7-------2-Methylphenol _______ l
108-60-l-------bis(2-Chloroisopropyl)ether I
106-44-5-------4-Methylphenol _______ l
621-64-7-------N-Nitroso-di-n-propylamine __ l
67-72-1-------Hexachloroethane ______ l
98-95-3-------Nitrobenzene ________ l
78-59-1-------Isophorone _________ l
88-75-5-------2-Nii:rophenol
105-67-9-------2,4-Dimethylphenol ____ _
65-85-0-------Benzoic acid ________ l
lll-91-l-------bis(2-Chloroethoxy)mei:hane_l
120-83-2-------2,4-Dichlorophenol ____ _
120-82-1-------l,2,4-Trichlorobenzene __ _
91-20-3-------Naphthalene
106-47-8-------4-Chloroaniline
87-68-3-------Hexachlorobutadiene
59-50-7-------4-Chloro-3-rnethylphenol
91-57-6-------2-Methylnaphthalene
77-47-4-------Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
88-06-2-------2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
95-95-4-------2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
91-58-7-------2-Chloronaphi:halene
88~74-4-------2-Nii:roaniline ______ _
131-11-3-------Dirnethylphthalate
208-96-8-------Acenaphthylene ______ _
606-20-2-------2,6-Dinitrotoluene ____ _
I
10. [U
10. [U
10. IU
10. IU
10. IU
10. IU
10. IU
10. [U
10. \U
10. IU
10. IU
10. iU
10. iU
10. IU
j_ 0 . ;u
1.0. IU
84. I
10. IU
10. IU
10. IU
10. IU
10. \U
10. \U
10. IU
10. [U
10. IU
::.o. ;u :,o. IU
10. IU
50. 1 U
10. :u
10. IU
10. IU
FORM I SV-1 "' z 098
Q
i
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1/87 Rev.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~c EPA SAMPLE NO.
c,EMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
:-IC141 /\£,
=-.2..:0 tiame: Contract: 68-WB-0045
_.an Code: Case No.: 619-123 SAS No.: SDG No.: HC124
Lab Sample ID: ,.,latrix: I soil/water) WATER
sample wt ;,.,01: 1000.0 lg/mL) ML
·• i..evel: (low/med) LOW
Lab File ID: 0223405
Date Received: 2/ 9/90
Date Extracted: 2/14/90
Date Analyzed: 2/23/90 I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
% Moisture: not dee. 100. dee. ---
Extraction: (SepF/Cont/Sonc) CONT
GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) N pH: 6. 0 Dilution Factor:
CAS NO. COMPOUND
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
(ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L
I
99-09-2-------3-Nitroaniline _______ l
83-32-9-------Acenaphthene;-_.,-_____ I
51-28-5-------2,4-Dinitrophenol _____ \
100-02-7-------4-Nitrophenol _______ !
132-64-9-------Dibenzofuran.....,.. _______ I
121-14-2-------2,4-Dinitrotoluene _____ l
84-66-2-------Diethylphthalate ___ ~ __ I
7005-72-3-------4-Chlorophenyl-phenylether I
86-73-7-------Fluorene......,..,,..,..-------=~
100-01-6-------4-Nitroaniline_---,--,----,--......,.-I
534-52-1-------4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol I
86-30-6-------N-Nitrosodiphenylamine (1)-1
101-55-3-------4-Bromophenyl-phenylether I
1~8-74-1-------Hexachlorobenzene _____ I
87-86-5-------Pentachlorophenol _____ I
85-01-8-------Phenanthrene
120-12-7-------Anthracene --------
84-74-2-------Di-n-butylphthalate
206-44-0-------Fluoranthene --------129-00-0-------Pyrene __ .,-;-;-.,-------
85-68-7-------3utylbenzylphthalate
31-94-1-------3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine ---56-55-3-------Benzo(a)anthracene ____ _
213-0l-9-------Chrysene~---------
ll7-81-7-------bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate
117-84-0-------Di-n-octylphthalate
205-99-2-------3enzo(b)fluoranthene ----207-08-9-------3enzo(k)fluorant.hene ----50-?2-8-------3enzo(a)pyrene -------193-39-5-------Indeno(l,2,3-cd)pyrene ---53-70-3-------Dibenz(a,h)anthracene
:.9l-24-2-------3enzo(g,h,i)perylene ----
50.
10.
50.
50.
10.
10.
10.
10.
10.
50.
50.
10.
10.
10.
so.
:. 0 .
10.
10.
10.
10.
l0.
20.
10.
:. 0 . ~o.
~o.
10.
:. 0 .
lO.
10.
10. :o.
,l) -cannot. be separated from d~phenylamine
FORM = SV-2 !· 2 0 99
1.00
Q
I
\U
IU
IU
\U
\U
IU
\U
\U
IU
\U
\U
IU
IU
iU
IU
IU
IU
\U
\U
IU
IU
\U
\U
\U
\U
IU
IU
IU
iU
iU
IU
IU
1/87 Rev.
~F EPA SAMPLE NO.
SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS
HC141 /<£
=-.ab Name: IEA Contract: 68-W8-0045
_di:J Code: IEA Case No.: 619-123 SAS No.: SDG No. : HC124
Lab Sample ID: :•!atr:.x: (soil/water) WATER
Sample wt/vol: 1000.0 (q/mL) ML Lab File ID: 0223405
~evel: (low/med) LOW Date Received: 2/ 9/90
l Moisture: not dee. 100. dee. Date Extracted: 2/14/90
Extraction: (SepF/Cont/Sonc) CONT Date Analyzed: 2/23/90
GPC Cleanup: (Y/Nl N pH: 6.0 Dilution Factor: 1.00
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
Number TICS found: 20 (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L
I I
CAS NUMBER I COMPOUND NAME RT EST. CONC. I ------I 1-
l. 107-92-6\Butanoic acid 9.43 8000. I J
2. -\UNKNOWN 9.85 10000. I J
3 • 109-52-4\Pentanoic acid 10.35 300. I J
4. - -\UNKNOWN HYDROXY ACID 11.02 1000. I J
5. -\UNKNOWN HYDROXY ACID 11.27 2000. I J
6. -\UNKNOWN HYDROXY ACID 11. 42 2000. I J
7. 142-62-1\Hexanoic acid (DOT) 11. 65 200. I J
8. -\UNKNOWN ESTER 14.13 400. I J
9. -\UNKNOWN ACID I 17.20 800. I J
i 10. 2370-14-111-0ctanol, 2,2-dimethyl-__ l 22.00 90. I J
ll. -\UNKNOWN HYDROCARBON I 22.08 80. I J
I 12. 91-56-5\lH-Indole-2,3-dione I 22.37 500. I J
', 13. -\UNKNOWN I 22.53 200. I J
<➔, -\UNKNOWN I 23.03 100. I J
15. 17302-32-8\Nonane, 3,7-dimethyl-I 23.17 80. I J
15. ➔87-89-8\lH-Indole-3-carboxaldehyde_l 23.82 1000. I J
17. -!UNKNOWN I 24.80 80. I J
18. 57-10-3\Hexadecanoic acid I 25.00 200. I J
19. -\UNKNOWN I 26.90 300. I J
20. 57-11-4\0ctadecanoic acid I 27.05 200. I J
~l. I I I
.::~. I I I
23. I I I ". L~, I I j
25. ! I I
.u. I I
27. .I I
28. I I
29.
3 0.
Q
FORM I SV-TIC l/87 Rev·.
• 2 100
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
lD EPA SAMPLE NO.
?ESTJ:C::::E ORGANICS ANALYS:IS :::ATA SHEET
HC14l
ab Name: IEA Contract: 68-WB-0045
~u.D Code: IEA Case No.: 619 -12 3 SAS No . :
c•lat.rix: ( soil/water I WATER
Sample wt/vol: 1000. (g/mL)ML
Level: (low/med) LOW
% Moisture: not dec.100. dee. 0.
Extraction: (SepF/Cont/Sonc) CONT
GPC Cleanup: ( Y /N) N pH: 6.0
SDG No.: HC124
Lab Sample ID:
Lab File ID: DB5A5795
Date Received: 2/ 9/90
Date Extracted: 2/10/90
Date Analyzed: 2/20/90
Dilution Factor: 1.00
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
CAS NO. COMPOUND (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L Q
I
319-84-6-----alpha-BHC .050 IU
319-85-7-----beta-BHC .050 \U
319-86-8-----delta-BHC .050 IU
58-89-9-----gamma-BHC .050 IU
76-44-8-----Heptachlor .050 \U
109-00-2-----Aldrin .050 IU
1024-57-3-----Heptachlor epoxide .050 IU
959-98-8-----Endosulfan I .050 \U
60-57-1-----Dieldrin .10 \U
72-55-9-----4,4'-DDE .10 \U
72-20-8-----Endrin .10 \U
33213-65-9-----Endosulfan II .10 \U
72-S4-8-----4,4'-DDD . :..o iU
1031-07-8-----Endosulfan sulfate .10 iU
50-29-3-----4,4'-DDT .10 \U
72-43-5-----Methoxychlor .so iU
S3494-70-5-----Endrin ketone .10 IU
5103-71-9-----alpha-Chlordane .50 IU
5103-74-2-----gamma-Chlordane . so IU
8001-35-2-----Toxaphene 1.0 \U
12674-11-2-----Aroclor-1016 .so iU
11104-28-2-----Aroclor-1221 .so ,U
~1141-16-5-----Aroclor-1232 .so [U
S3469-21-9-----Aroclor-1242 .50 iU
12672-29-6-----Aroclor-1248 50 IU
11097-69-1-----Aroclor-1254 .0 IU
11096-82-5-----Aroclor-1260 . 0 :u
'3 O ·z. S
FORM I PEST 1/87 Rev.
ENVIROFORMS/CLP 788
1
INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
SAMPLE NO.
HCS141
SDG No. : HCS124 Lab Name: IEA, INC.
Lab Code: IEA Lab Sample ID: 619-123-18
Matrix (soil/water): WATER Client ID: SBR WASTED SLUDGE
Level (low/med): LOW Date Received: 02/09/90
% Solids: 0. 0
Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg dry weight): UG/L
I I I I I
I I I I I
: CAS No. : Analyte : Concentration: C: Q M :
I I I I I '------'----,----________ ,_, _,
:7429-90-5 :Aluminum 22900 :_: 1:_:
:7440-36-0 :Antimony 48.5 :~: 1:_:
:1440-38-2 /Arsenic 2.5 :~: r_:
7440-39-3 :Barium 4370 :_: ___ :1:_:
7440-41-7 :Beryllium 0.97 :~: :1:_:
7440-43-9 :cadmium 15.9 :_: :1:_:
7440-70-2 :calcium 123000 :_: :1:_:
7440-47-3 :chromium 254 :_: :1:_:
7440-48-4 :cobalt 2140 :_: :1:_:
7440-50-8 :copper 737 :_: :1:_:
: 7439-89-6 : Iron 114000 :_: :1:_:
:7439-92-1 :Lead 34.2 :_: :r_:
: 7439-95-4 :Magnesium 91200 :_: :1:_:
l7439-96-5 :Manganese 563000 :_:E :1:_:
:7439-97-6 :Mercury 0.20 :Q: :cv:
l7440-02-0 lNickel 650 :_: :1:_:
l7440-09-7 :Potassium 8990 :_: :1:_:
l7782-49-2 Selenium 2.0 :~:w :r_:
: 7440-22-4 Silver 96. 6 :_: /1:_l
: 7440-23-5 sodium 366000 :_: :1:_:
l7440-28-0 Thallium 1.0 :QlW lLl
: 7440-62-2 Vanadium 16. 2 :~: :1:_:
l7440-66-6 Zinc 4280 :_: :1:_:
Cyanide 21.2 :_:N :£....:
~lor Before: BLACK
:lor Af:er: YELLOW
Clarity Before: CLOUDY
Clarity After: CLEAR
Texture:
Artifacts:
11ents:
SBR WASTED SLUDGE FORM I -IN 7/88
1 016
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
rn
IEA Project t:
Client Name:
Sample # Client ID
1 SBR Wasted Sludge
2 Filter Press Sludge
1 SBR Wasted Sludge
2 Filter Press Sludge
1 SBR Wasted Sludge
2 Filter Press Sludge
1 SBR Wasted Sludge
2 Filter Press Sludge
1 SBR Wasted Sludge
2 Filter Press Sludge
1 SBR Wasted Sludge
2 Filter Press Sludge
1 SBR Wasted Sludge
2 Filter Press Sludge
1 SBR Wasted Sludge
2 Filter Press Sludge
Samples taken on 2/8/90.
IEA LABORATORY RESULTS
619-129
Hoechst Celanese Corporation
Parameter Results
TCLP -Arsenic <0.50 mg/L
TCLP -Arsenic <0.50 mg/L
TCLP -Barium <10 mg/L
TCLP -Barium <10 mg/L
TCLP -Cadmium <0.10 mg/L
TCLP -Cadmium <0.10 mg/L
TCLP -Chromium <0.5 mg/L
TCLP -Ch.romium <0.5 mg/L
TCLP -Mercury <0.0005 mg/L
TCLP -Mercury <0.0005 mg/L
TCLP -Lead <0.50 mg/L
TCLP -Lead <0.50 mg/L
TCLP -Selenium <0.10 mg/L
TCLP -Selenium <0.10 mg/L
TCLP -Silver <0.5 mg/L
TCLP -Silver <0.5 mg/L
Date
Analyzed
02/23/90
02/23/90
02/23/90
02/23/90
02/23/90
02/23/90
02/23/90
02/23/90
02/26/90
02/26/90
02/23/90
02/23/90
02/26/90
02/26/90
02/23/90
02/23/90
rn
IEA Sample Nwnber:
Sample Identification:
Date Analyzed:
Nwnber Compound
1 Benzene
2 2-Butanone
J Carbon disulfide
CELANESE
GC/MS PURGEABLES
SW-846 METHOD 8240
619-129-1
SBR Wasted Sludge
02/28/90 By: Casto
Quantitation
Limit
(ug/L)
25
125
25
4 Carbon tetrachloride 25
5 Chlorobenzene
6 Chloroform
7 1,2-Dichloroethane
8 1,2-Dichloroethene (total)
9 Tetrachlorcethene
10 Toluene
11 Trichloroethane
12 Vinyl chloride
13 Isobutanol
comments:
BQL = Below Quantitation Limit
ZHE/TCLP Extraction
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
50
500
Results
concentration
(ug/L)
BQL
IIQL
BQL
IIQL
BQL
IIQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
Quantitation limit elevated due to sample dilution prior to analysis.
Sample diluted due to presence of non-target compounds.
FORM 8240C REV. 022090
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I rn
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
CELANESE
BASE/NEUTRAL/ACID EXTRACTABLES
SW-846 METHOD 8270
IEA sample Number: 619-129-1
SBR waeted Sludge
02/21/90
Sample Identification:
Date Extracted:
Date Analyzed: 02/26/90
Number compound
1 l,4-0ichlorobenzene
2· 1,2-0ichlorobenzene
3 2,4-0initrotoluene
4 Hexachlcrobenzene
5 Hexachlorobutadiene
6 Hexachlorcethane
7 2-Methylphenol (o-cresol)
8 4-Methylphenol (p-cresol)
9 Nitrobenzene
10 Pentachlorophenol
11 Phenol
12 2,4,S-Trichlorophenol
13 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
14 Pyridine
15 2,3,4,6-Tetrachlorophenol
16 3-Methylphenol(m-cresol)
comments:
By: Schemmer
Quantitation
Limit
(ug/L)
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
so
10
10
10
10
10
10
BQL Below Quantitation Limit
TCLP Extraction
FORM 8270C. Rev. 022090
Results
concentration
(ug/L)
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
· I I I rn
CELANESE
PESTICIDES/ HERBICIDES
IEA Sample Number: 619-129-1
Sample Identification: SBR Wasted Sludge
Date Analyzed: 02/27/90
Number Compound
PESTICIDES:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
gamma-BHC (Lindane)
Heptachlor
Heptachlor epoxide
Endrin
Methoxychlor
Toxaphene
Chlordane (technical)
HERBICIDES:
1
2
Comments:
2,4,-D
2,4,5-TP
BQL = Below Quantitation Limit
TCLP Extraction
FORM 8080C. Rev 022089
By: Hinshaw
Quantitation
Limit
(ug/L)
0.25
0.25
0.25
a.so
2.5
s.o
2.5
10
2.0
Results
concentration
(ug/L)
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
I
I
I
I
I
I'
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
IEA Sample Number:
Sample Identification:
Date Analyzed:
Number compound
l Benzene
2 2-Butanone
3 Carbon disulfide
CELANESE
GC/MS PURGEABLES
SW-846 METHOD 8240
619-129-2
Filter Press Sludge
02/28/90 By: Casto
Quantitation
Limit
(ug/L)
10
50
10
4 Carbon tetrachloride 10
5 Chlorobenzene 10
6 Chloroform 10
7 1,2-Dichloroethane 10
8 l,2-Dichloroethene (total) 10
9 Tetrachloroethene 10
10 Toluene 10
11 Trichloroethane 10
12 Vinyl chloride 20
13 Isobutanol 200
comments:
BQL Below Quantitation Limit
ZHE/TCLP Extraction
Results
concentration
(ug/L)
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
Quantitation limit elevated due to sample dilution prior to analysis.
Sample diluted due to presence of non-target compounds.
FORM 8240C REV. 022090
IEA Sample Number:
CELANESE
BASE/NEUTRAL/ACID EXTRACTABLES
SW-846 METHOD 8270
619-129-2
Sample Identification: Filter Press Sludge
02/21/90 Date Extracted:
Date Analyzed: 02/26/90 By: Schemmer
Quantitation
Number compound
l l,4-Dichlorobenzene
2 l,2-Dichlorobenzene
3 2,4-Dinitrotoluene
4 Hexachlorobenzene
5 Hexachlorobutadiene
6 Hexachloroethane
7 2-Methylphenol (o-cresol)
8 4-Methylphenol (p-cresol)
9 Nitrobenzene
10 Pentachlorophenol
11 Phenol
12 2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
13 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
14 Pyridine
15 2,3,4,6-Tetrachlorophenal
16 3-Methylphenol(m-cresol)
Comments:
BQL = Below Quantitation Limit
TCLP Extraction
FORM 8270C. Rev. 022090
Limit
(ug/L)
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
50
10
10
10
10
10
10
Results
Concentration
(ug/L)
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL.
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I ~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
CELANESE
PESTICIDES/ HERBICIDES
IEA Sample Number: 619-129-2
Sample Identification: Filter Press Sludge
Date Analyzed: 02/27/90
Number Compound
PESTICIDES:
1 gamma-BHC (Lindane)
2 Heptachlor
3 Heptachlor epoxide
4 Endrin
5 Methoxychlor
6 Toxaphene
7 Chlordane (technical)
HERBICIDES:
1
2
Comments:
2,4,-D
2,4,5-TP
BQL = Below Quantitation Limit
TCLP Extraction
FORM BOBOC. Rev 022089
By: Hinshaw
Quantitation
Limit
(ug/L)
0.25
o. 25
o. 25
a.so
2.5
5.0
2.5
10
2.0
Results
Concentration
(ug/L)
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
5050H190
APPENDIX V
OUTER TIER
INFLUENT/EFFLUENT WATER QUALITY DATA
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
ClJTER TIER
Influent
Influent TDC (mg/I)
Influent TOX (mg/I)
Influent Conductivity (Ullhos>
Influent pH
Influent COO (mg/I)
Influent TSS (mg/I)
Air Stripping Tower
Effluent Stripping TOC (mg/l)
Carbon Filter
Carbon Effluent TDC (mg/I)
Carbon Effluent TOX (mg/I)
Effluent Conductivity (llthos)
Effluent pH
Effluent COO (mg/I)
Effluent BOO (mg/I)
Effluent TSS (mg/I)
X Rem:,val TDC Effluent
X Removal Tax Effluent
% Removal COO Effluent
0UALDAT2.~KS Rev 5/14/90
2/1
7.00
6.22
2.60
2.20
68.57'1
HC/Shelby ~ater Quality Data
2/2 2/3 2/4 2/5
6.37 6.16 6.19 6.02
Note: X Removals are relative to influent values
2/6
6. ,o
2/7
425
6.25
20.00
1.70
4.21
7.59
5
0.80
4.00
2/8
3.80
0.03
5.99
2.90
2.70 o.o,
28.95~
CIJTER TIER
Influent
Influent TOC (mg/l l
Influent TOX (mg/l)
Influent Conductivity (._..hos)
Influent pH
Influent COO (mg/l)
Influent TSS (mg/I)
Air Stripping Tower
Effluent Stripping TOC (mg/l)
Carbon Filter
Carbon Effluent TOC (mg/l)
Carbon Effluent TOX (mg/l)
Effluent Conductivity (._..hos)
Effluent pH
Effluent COO (mg/I)
Effluent BOO (mg/ll
Effluent TSS (mg/I)
X Removal TOC Effluent
X Removal TOX Effluent
X Removal COO Effluent
QUALOAT2.WKS Rev 5/14/90
HC/Shelby Water Quality Data
2/9 2/10 2/11 2/12 2/13
6.19 6.25 6.20 6.00 6.05
2/14
5.99
7.51
5
,. 10
Mote: X Removals are relative to influent values
2/15
4.40
6.08
3.40
2.80
36.36X
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
ClJTER Tl ER
Influent
Influent TOC (mg/I)
Influent T0X (mg/I)
Influent Conductivity (lllhos)
Influent pH
Influent COO (mg/I)
Influent TSS (mg/I)
Air Stripping Tower
Effluent Stripping TOC (mg/l)
Carbon Filter
Carbon Effluent TOC (mg/I)
'Carbon Effluent TOX Cmg/l)
Effluent Conductivity (\Jllhos)
Effluent pll
Effluent COO {mg/I)
Effluent BOO (mg/l)
Effluent TSS (mg/I)
X Removal TOC Effluent
X Removal TOX Effluent
X Removal COO Effluent
QUALOAT2.WKS Rev 5/14/90
HC/Shelby Water Quality Data
2/16 2/17 2/18 2/19 2/20
6.12 6.06 6.04 6.39 6.05
2/21
5.98
7.44
5
0.90
Mote: X Removals are relative to influent values
2/22 2/23 2/24
6.70 8.23
6.06 6.07 6.05
5.70
3.00 6.27
55.22% 23.78%
ClJTER TIER
Influent
Influent TOC (mg/ll
Influent TOX (mg/l)
Influent Conci.lctivity ("'4hos)
Influent pH
Influent COO (mg/ll
Influent TSS (mg/ll
Air Stripping Tower
Effluent Stripping TOC (mg/ll
Carbon Filter
Carbon Effluent TOC (mg/I}
Carbon Effluent TOX (mg/ll
Effluent Conductivity (\Jlllhos)
Effluent pH
Effluent COO (mg/l)
Effluent BOO (mg/I)
Effluent TSS (mg/l)
X Removal TOC Effluent
X Removal TOX Effluent
X Removal COO Effluent
0UALDAT2.'JKS Rev 5/14/90
2/25
6.49
HC/Shelby Water Quality Data
2/26 2/27
6.27 6.35
2/28
6.18
7.63
20
Note: X Removals are relative to influent values
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
ClJTER TIER
Influent
Influent TDC (mg/l)
Influent TOX (mg/I)
Influent Conductivity (l.llhos)
Influent pH
Influent coo (mg/I)
Influent TSS (mg/I)
Air Stripping Tower
Effluent Stripping TOC (mg/l)
Carbon Filter
Carbon Effluent TOC (mg/l)
Carbon Effluent TOX (mg/l)
Effluent Conductivity (1..tthos)
Effluent P"
Effluent COO (mg/I)
Effluent BOO (mg/l)
Effluent TSS (mg/I)
X Removal TDC Effluent
X Removal TOX Effluent
X Removal COO Effluent
OUALDAT2.WKS Rev 5/16/90
HC/Shelby Water Quality Data
3/1 3/2 3/3 3/4 3/5 3/6
4.60
6.24 6.15 6.75 6.14 6.63 6.31
2.90
3.00
34.78%
Mote: X Removals are relative to influent values
3/7
282
6.31
4000
3/8
3.90
0.02
6.50
2.80
2.50
0.010
35.90%
50.00%
CUTER TIER
Influent
Influent TDC (mg/l)
Influent TOX (mg/I)
Influent Conductiv;ty (ll(hos)
Influent pl!
Influent COO (mg/ll
Influent TSS (mg/I)
Air Stripping Tower
Effluent Stripping TOC (mg/l)
Carbon Filter
Carbon Effluent TOC (mg/I)
Carbon Effluent TOX (mg/l)
Effluent Conductivity Cur4hos)
Effluent pl!
Effluent COO (mg/ll
Effluent BOO (mg/I)
Effluent TSS (mg/I)
X Removal TOC Effluent
X Removal TOX Effluent
X Removal COO Effluent
QUALOAT2.IJKS Rev 5/14/90
I
Ht/Shelby Water Quality Data I
3/10 3/11 3/12 3/13 3/14 3/15 I
5.00 I
6.41 6.21 6.07 6.23 6. 1a 6.14
I
4.00 I
3.00
I
40.00X I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Mote: % Removals are relative to influent values I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
11.JTER TIER
Influent
Influent TOC (mg/l l
Influent TOX (mg/l)
Influent Conductivity (L14hos)
Influent pH
Influent COO (mg/ll
Influent TSS (mg/l)
Air Stripping Tower
Effluent Stripping TOC (mg/l)
Carbon Filter
Carbon Effluent TOC (mg/l)
Carbon Effluent TOX (mg/ll
Effluent Conductivity (\.Jllhos)
Effluent pl!
Effluent COO Cmg/ll
Effluent BOO (mg/l)
Effluent TSS (mg/l)
X Removal TDC Effluent
X Removal TOX Effluent
X Removal COO Effluent
0UALDAT2.\JKS Rev 5/14/90
HC/Shelby Water Quality Data
3/16 3/17 3/18 3/19 3/20 3/21 3/22 3/23 3/24
9.98
6.16 6.13 6.15 5.94 5.89 6.05 6.55 6.12 6.20
100.00X
Note: X Removals are relative to influent values
ClJTER TIER
Influent
Influent roe (mg/ll
Influent rox (mg/I)
Influent Conductivity Cl.l4hos)
Influent pH
Influent COO (mg/l)
Influent rss (mg/I)
Air Stdpping Tower
Effluent Stripping TOC Cmg/l)
Carbon Filter
Carbon Effluent roe (mg/I)
Carbon Effluent TOX (mg/l)
Effluent Conductivity (l.lllhos)
Effluent pH
Effluent COD (mg/I)
Effluent BOD (mg/I)
Effluent rss (mg/I)
X Removal TOC Effluent
X Removal TOX Effluent
X Removal COO Effluent
0UALDAT2.'JKS Rev 5/14/90
HC/Shelby Water Quality Data
3/25 3/26 3/27 3/28 3/29 3/30
4.10
6.21 5.78 5.91 6.20 6.22 6.05
3.60
2.70
34.15%
Note: X Removals are relative to influent values
3/31
6.06
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Cl.lTER TIER
Influent
Influent TOC (mg/l)
Influent TOX (mg/l)
Influent Conductivity (IJl,lhos)
Influent pH
Influent COO (mg/l)
Influent TSS (mg/l)
Air Stripping Tower
Effluent Stripping TDC (mg/l)
Carbon Filter
Carbon Effluent TDC (mg/l)
Carbon Effluent TOX (mg/l)
Effluent Conductivity (lt!hos)
Effluent pH
Effluent COO (mg/l)
Effluent BOO (mg/l)
Effluent TSS (mg/l)
X Removal TOC Effluent
X Removal TOX Effluent
X Removal COO Effluent
QUALDAT2.YKS Rev 5/22/90
4/1
6.01
HC/Shelby Yater Quality Oata
4/2 4/3
6.17 6.01
4/4
393
6.08
25
389.00
7.39
25
0.40
3.00
4/5
3.90
0.034
6.14
3.10
2.80
0.013
28.21X
4/6
6.00
Note: X Removals are relative to influent values
4/7 4/8 4/9
6.00 5.91 6.08
ClJTER TIER
Influent
Influent TDC (mg/ll
Influent TOX (mg/l)
Influent Conductivity (IJilhos)
Influent pti
Influent COO (mg/l)
Influent TSS (mg/ll
Air Stripping Tower
Effluent Stripping TOC (mg/l)
Carbon Filter
Carbon Effluent TOC (mg/l)
Carbon Effluent TOX (mg/ll
Effluent Conductivity ('-"!hos)
Effluent pH
Effluent COO (mg/ll
Effluent 800 (mg/l)
Effluent TSS Cmg/l)
X Removal TDC Effluent
X Removal TOX Effluent
X Removal COO Effluent
QUALDAT2.WKS Rev 5/22/90
4/10
6. 10
MC/Shelby Water Quality Oata
4/11
6.60
7.30
5
0.30
4/12
7.30
6.20
9.60
10.00
4/13 -4/14
6.40 6.00
4/15
6.20
Note: X Removals are relative to influent values
4/16 4/17
5.90 5.90
4/18
6.00
7.50
10
0.60
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
' Cl.JTER TIER
Influent
Influent TOC (mg/ll
Influent T0X (mg/ll
Influent Conductivity (lllhos)
Influent pH
Influent COO (mg/l)
Influent TSS (mg/l)
Air Stripping Tower
Effluent Stripping TOC (mg/l)
Carbon Filter
Carbon Effluent TOC (mg/l)
Carbon Effluent TOX (mg/l)
Effluent Conductivity (ll4hos)
Effluent pH
Effluent COO (mg/ll
Effluent BOO (mg/l)
Effluent TSS (mg/l)
X Removal TOC Effluent
X Removal T0X Effluent
X Removal COO Effluent
QUALDAT2.~KS Rev 5/22/90
HC/Shelby ~ater Quality Data
4/19 4/20 4/21 4/22 4/23 4/24
5.50
5.90 6.00 6.10 6.40 6.00 6.00
14.00
11.00
Note: % Removals are relative to influent values
4/25
6.10
7.20
5
0.10
4/26 4/27
6.24
6.00 6.30
7.23
5.56
10.90X
ClJTER TI ER
Influent
Influent TOC (mg/I)
Influent TOX (mg/l)
Influent Conductivity (ll(hos)
Influent pH
Influent COO (mg/I)
Influent TSS (mg/I)
Air Stripping Tower
Effluent Stripping TOC (mg/I)
Carbon Filter
Carbon Effluent TOC (mg/l)
Carbon Effluent TOX (mg/l)
Effluent Conductivity (Lflhos)
Effluent pli
Effluent COO (mg/l)
Effluent BOO (mg/I)
Effluent TSS (mg/l)
X Removal TOC Effluent
X Removal TOX Effluent
X Removal COO Effluent
QUALOAT2.WKS Rev 5/22/90
I
HC/Shelby Water Quality Data I
I 4/28 4/29 4/30
6.10 6.50 5.90
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Mote: X Removals are relative to influent values I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I-
I
I
OUTER TIER
Influent
Influent TOC Cmg/l)
Influent TOX (mg/l)
Influent Conductivity (I.Jilhos)
Influent pl!
Influent coo (mg/l)
Influent TSS (mg/l)
Air Stripping Tower
Effluent Stripping TOC (mg/l)
Carbon Filter
Carbon Effluent TOC (mg/l)
Carbon Effluent TOX (mg/l)
Effluent Conductivity (\Jllhos)
Effluent pH
Effluent COO Cmg/l)
Effluent BOO (mg/l)
Effluent TSS (mg/l)
X Removal TDC Effluent
X Removal TOX Effluent
X Removal COO Effluent
0UALDAT2.WKS Rev 5/22/90
HC/Shelby ~ater Quality Data
No. Sal11)les Average Maxinun Mininun
14
3
3
89
3
1
12
13
3
2
8
8
7
2
12
1
0
5.76
0.03
366.67
6.15
1348.33
1 .70
5.15
4.43
0.01
196.61
7.45
10.00
0.60
3.50
41.40%
50.00X
9.98
0.03
425.00
6.75
4000.00
1. 70
14.00
11.00
0.01
389.00
7.63
25.00
1.10
4.00
100.00X so.oox
3.80
0.02
282.00
5.78
20.00
1.70
2.60
2.20
0.01
4.21
7.20
5.00
0.10
3.00
10.90%
50.00X
Note: X Removals are relative to influent values
-------------------
I a.
9.00
8.00
7.00
6.00
5.00
Outer Tier pH
+ + + + + + + +
+ + + + + + + + +
+ + + +
• • • • • • • •• • • •
• • rl' • • •
• ■ ■ .. -.. .... ■• •• • .. .. • -

-

•

J' ••••
•• • • • ,,,__-. • • •• ■ • .,,. • ... • ... • • • .., __ • --
•• .,.. •• .. • • -~ ■ • • •• ■ .. .
• • • • • ... -• • • • ........ --. . . . . . . -.. · -,,, •••
• • • • • ■ •• -

•

-·
4 -~~-1--/_1 ____ 142/_1 ____ 1 /1--1----1 /+3-1 ____ 3__,/1--3----4+/2 ____ 57/3
• Outer Tier Influent + Outer Tier Effluent
Outer Tier TOC Influent vs. Effluent 100.00 T 0 T 100.00% 0 • f 90.00% 0 • +ao.oo,.; 0 0 • ~ • t?0.00% • 0 • '-0 + "' 10.00 0 • + E • • ~ + • • ~ ~ + • • "+ • 60.00% II( 0 + • • + ~ !!! + • • + . 0 • 0 IE + • • • • • > w 50.00% ~ + + + + + ,,!$ 0 + + + + + + ., + c,: ~ + + !!! 0 + u 0 40.00% 0 ~ I-0 0 1.00 0 0 u 0 t30.00% I-0 0 0 0 I 20.00% 0 110.00% 0.10 0.00% 11/1 12/1 1/1 1/31 3/3 4/2 5/3 • TOC Influent + TOC Effluent 0 TOC Removal " -------------------
Hl,.L.:,F QkM • L.:. OUTER TIEF-. COMEdNED (NFLUENT ~·,age No. -MONTH ~e.b YR..!.!..... t:ONU, PM COD 90D roe DAY l/MONTM DAILY l/MUNrM 1/MONTH l /WE Et· 1st.WED. ltit.WEO. ltit,WED. TMUR. l ,,J:l I -I ,.n -' -'1, -4 ,.,1 ' I I 5 "'O.l I 0 ,.10 I 7 'f,~S' l,.a.G :2" ,. 7 8 r. 'i'1 9 'l..11 le) 1...1, 11 ,.~o 1: (oo 13 ,.df 14 5':'11 lS ,.ol ~¥¥¥ lb (,,/2 17 l,.o' 18 ,.o If I 19 '-39 :1) /,,o5 I :1 ~,, I --/,,.o, --. -· (.,O'? 8'. 2.1., =• (,.or :s ,.~ :o l,.J.1 ' f..l~ -; CA ~.,a -. --I AVG. L/'J.-5 xxxxx ";)..b 17 l'"J,83? LO" IS'. 91 I I?. /.Ii/LI I HIGH ,.11~ i/>!!...9
I
HCCFORM • l" ..
OUTER TIER CARBON FILTER EFFLUENT .FeJ, (I ~·•q• No. • MONTI-I y~
CONO. FH coo BOO TSS rJH.~N F'04 TOC
CAY !/MONTH l/1,,,W.. l/WI:. l /WI:, l/MONTH 1 /MONTH 1/MONTI-I l/WI<..
1st.WED. WEO. WEO. WEO. lST...,EO. lST...,ED. !ST.WED. THUR,
1 I --
--
• I
s
6
7 '/.21 7.5' s O,f 0 tJ ,. 7 t {),II
8
q
l (I
11
l:
1:.
14 7.r'I tJS' I.I
15 e.,aG
16
17
18
19 I :.:o
:1 -,, 'I'/ 0£' D.i ----
_, t.J7J..
:•
:5
:6
27
~~ ?, {, '} .%.0 •
'
-I --;-1_
AVG, J.(. '.l. I '}_CI/ t>9 r.,J./ 1,7 ~ o,/ I ?. /'YI 1 LOW .,,} oS I.. ?-7?-,,-,...,
HIGH ?.l. 7, ~o Ji.I~ 1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
DAY
l
-I -,.
4
5
6
7
8
~
10
11
1:
1 .::
14
15
16
17
18
19
:o
:1
----
2-:.
:;:•
=~
:6
:;:7
~R
29
::1)
:.1
AVG,
LOW
HIGH
CONU. . .. COD 81JD roe
1/MlJNTH D<>ILY l/MONfH l /MOf-HH 1/WEEf
1st.WED. 1st.WED. 1st ,WED. lHUR,
t,,21/. j,4~
b.1<
1.,1$
6 .1 <I
~.C: "l
C,, ( /
J..32-,.;/ <1-aoe. /,3
I, ,!,O I ,£"t
(1.J_
It. 'i)./
6/'J I
/,;~ r
/ .z~ ,,;,
~.;Ii / '7,78
t,1
t,.13
J,I~
c;C,1
L('" JI~
t.of.
~.$, 99,1~
/_.(2 --
i IA '2)
6,J./
'f, '?!
5",q/J
I,, 9i I
4U Jf,C.7
L.A~
lt;,i:,C.
d-8d-xxxxx l-1/in,-c, I, J I I. "J.../
l5:?8
'
J ,.c;?i
I I... "15 ) J,r:, 7
i '..:DND. FH I CIJD
OA'i I~ I r-'IIJ~◄fH DAILYll/MONfl-l
i ~s:.:..iEU. 1st.WED.
' '
:1 l if,. t? I
' . ' ,.17 -
• ,~.ol :1 .
' ' , 3;3 ,, ,pg ~<:;" '1
;I " it,1J1 I
:,
:i , / t,,,p I
I 7 I ~. ,,,, :
8 I ~9/
'/ I !£,o3
1 (1 I ! ~./
l l I J,1.
1:: IL~ ' I I ~-I I 1::
14 t,~
15 ~.2-
16 5,'7 I
l 7 ;-,'/
18 J,()
JO I ~'1
:,:i t,c
:1 I,.; ! --i.11 I --
--,,o ..
:, '·6 :5 I t./
i :, I ! I . , ·6
I I , •. 1 I -, I
' ' -;-;~ I t,J
:q t.~
:-.(1 s.'j
:.1
'
I A'/G. 13/3 XX .X. XX ~§
! cow I s.~ I I
HIGH ~.t,
800 roe
l /MCJ~HI-I l/WEEf
lst.wEO. T,-!UF:.
I I
/.S
I 3t,Ju
' I '
I
'
I
I I
'J,tS"
3,95
,.~
f,5 I~ rr
I 3.t:s
°U,711
I
i
'
I I
:
:
II
I
: !
i
I
'
I
I
I
I
I,
. I
I
I
I
I
I
I
: I
!1
I
' ' ' I
I
I I
I
I
I
I I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
•
DAY
I
l
:
!
• ,
6
7
8
9
10
11
1~
l ::.
14
1~
16
17
18
19
:o
Zl
----
23
=•
:::,
:6
:7
:s
29
:!.o
31
nvu.
LOW
HIGH
OUTER r IE.R STRIF'F·ER TOWE" EFFLUENT
MONTH
~c !EA
TDC TDC
poin oom
i
2...(,, .l f
'+. ~as
2..91_3
\
11. 224.
0, /9J/
~~1
~.~
I CONO.
:, ,:,,., it/MONTH
11 '~,:;t.WED.
i
/I :
:1 -I -II
ij .l : 3i'7
i 5 I
i "
I 7
I 8
I
"
I 11)
11
1:
13 I
14
' I 15 I
16
17
18
19
:,:, I I ' ! :1 I I
I --I --
I ----' =•
I :5
I :6
_,
:1 :s
' ;:q
?-0
~l
AVG, 35?9
LOW
HIGH
0UTER TIER C~~BQN FiLfE~ EFCLUENT
FH coo I 800 I TSS
i NH~.N
1/\•U'.. l ,' w• . 11 w• . l/MQNTH l/MONTH
~ED. WED. wEO. , t~r.wr::o. tST,WEO.
' I I
I
I
I 13, I "'~ o, I./ I 03 0,3c
I
70 fJ..> ~ ,::J
I
I !
I I
r;,s lo o,I.
7.~ c,5' o. I
I
I
XX XX. X I I () 't,./ I c>~ t),3-v
?.?-f)C: /Jr /
?-s ~q O,tl
F·Q4 TOC
l/MONTI-I l/Wt ,
!ST.WED. THUR.
I I
~-d lf
J!,,1/
I
l~.l.r
r;.t;o
S.>1
() ,08 /.~-7D
~-~/
IJ/,.1/
I
I
:1
l
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I ' i
I
'I
I
'
.I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Client Sanple J.D.#:
IEA Assigned EPA#:
Date ~le red:
S~le Matdx:
Contract No.: 68-WB-0045
Date Reported:
TARGET CCMPCVNDS/ANALYTES
VOA TARGETED CCIIIPCIJNOS (ug/L)
Methylene Chloride
Acetone
Carbon Disulfide
1,2-0ichloroethene (total)
2-Butanone
Trichloroethene
Benzene
Ch l orobenzene
METALS (ug/l)
Chromiun
TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED CCJ4POUNOS
VOA NON-TARGETED CCJ4PClJNDS (ug/L)
Ethanol
2-Methyl-Propanol
Butanal
2-Propyl Furan
Substituted Formic Acid
Substituted Acetic Acid
Tetrahydro·Furan
Substituted Propane
Substituted Butanoic Acid
Unknown
Unknown
Trimethyl Silanol
Substituted Formic Acid
Ethanol (ACN)
Methyl Ester Acetic Acid
Substituted Propane
Substituted Butanoic Acid
Substituted Butanoic Acid
Subst;tuted Butanoic Acid
Unknown
Substituted Formic Acid
Substituted Propane
Subst;tuted Butanoic Acid
Substituted Acetic Acid
Unknown
Ethenyl Ester Formic Acid
Unknown Hydrocarbon
1-Chloro-2-Hethyl Propane
Ethyl Ester Butanoic Acid
Acetic Acid Butyl Ester
1-Hexanol
Unknown Hydrocarbon
Unknown
Butanol
Unknown
2-Hethyl Propanoic Acid
EFFCLPVC.~K1 Revised 5/25/90
voes AND CHRCJ4IUM
DETECTED IN CIJTER TIER
INFLUENT/EFFLUENT SAMPLES
HC/SHELBY, N.C.
WESTINGHWSE PROJECT: 4124·85-0SOH
#1: outer
Tier
Influent
HC13a
2/9/90
IIATER
3/20/90
3 J
10 J
Page l
Client Sarrple J.D.#i
IEA Assigned EPA#:
Date s~le red:
S~le Matrix:
Contract No.: 68-W8·0045
Date Reported:
Pentanoic Acid
Unknown Alcohol
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Dichlorofluoro Methane
Unknown Acid
Propyl Cyclopropene
2-Heptanone
.Acetaldehyde (DOT)
Unknown Acid
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
EFFCLPVC.\lt:::1 Revised 5/25/90
voes ANO CHRCl41UM
DETECTED IN ClJTER TIER
INFLUENT/EFFLUENT SAMPLES
Ht/SHELBY, N.C.
WESTINGHClJSE PROJECT: 4124·85·050H
#1: outer
Tier
Influent
HC138
2/9/90
'i,/ATER
3/20/90
5 J
Page 2
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Client Sanple 1.0.#:
IEA Assigned EPA#:
Date saq>le red:
Saq>le Matrix:
Contract No.: 68-IJS-0045
Date Reported:
TARGET COMPOUNDS/ANALYTES
VOA TARGETED COMPaJNDS (ug/l)
Acetone
2-Butanone
Benzene
2-Hexanone
Chlorobenzene
B/N TARGETED COMPOJNOS (ug/L)
Benzyl Alcohol
Di·n·butylphthalate
Oiethylphthalate
ACID EXTRACTABLE COMPOJNDS {ug/l)
Phenol
2·Chlorophenol
4-Methylphenol
Benzoic Acid
PESTICIDES (ug/L)
Aldrin
PCBs (ug/l)
(none detected)
METALS (ug/L)
Al uni nun
Antimony
Arsenic
Bariun
Berylliun
Caciniun
Calciun
Chromiun
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
Leed
Magnesiun
Manganese
Nick.el
Potassiun
Silver
Sodi un
Thalliun
Vanadiun
Zinc
cyanide
EFFCLP.IJKl Revised 5/25/90
TCL, TAL and TIC COMPClJNOS/ANALYTES
DETECTED IN OUTER TIER
INFLUENT/EFFLUENT SAIIPLES
HC/SHELBY, N.C.
IIESTINGHOUSE PROJECT: 4124·65·050H
#7: outer
Tier
Effluent
HC140
2/9/90
WATER
3/20/90
131 8
1.4 8
26400
33.5 B
2.3
6340
303 E
5590
41900
0.00
17.7 B
Page 1
Client Senple I.0.#:
IEA Assigned EPA#:
Date S8ff1)le red:
Saq,le Matrix:
Contract No.: 68-WS-0045
Date Reported:
TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS
VOA NON-TARGETED COMPOUNDS (ug/L)
Trimethyl Silanol
BNA NON-TARGETED COMPOONDS (ug/L)
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
EFFCLP.IJKl Revised 5/25/90
TCL, TAL and TIC COMPOONDS/ANALYTES
DETECTED IN OUTER TIER
INFLUENT/EFFLUENT SAMPLES
HC/SHELBY, N.C.
SESTINGHOUSE PROJECT: 4124-85-0SOH
#7: outer
Tier
Effluent
HC140
2/9/90
SATER
3/20/90
8 J
10 J
100 J
20 J
I
•1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Page 2 I
I
I
I r,ab Name: IEA
Lab Code : I EA
lA
VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
contract: 68-WB-0045
Case No.: 619-123 SAS No.:
EPA SAMPLE NO.
HC138
I Matrix: (soil/water) WATER
SDG No.: HC124
Lab Sample ID:
Sample wt/vol: 5.000 (g/mL) ML
I Level: (low/med) LOW
Lab File ID: 0214218
Date Received: 2/ 9/90
Date Analyzed: 2/14/90
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
% Moisture: not dee. 100.
Column: (pack/cap) CAP Dilution Factor: 1.00
CAS NO. COMPOUND
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
(ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L
I I
I 74-87-3-------CHLOROMETHANE 10. \U
I 74-83-9-------BROMOMETHANE -------! 10. IU
I 75-01-4-------VINYL CHLORIDE ______ _i 10. IU
I 75-00-3-------CHLOROETHANE __ ~-----• 10. IU
I 75-09-2-------METHYLENE CHLORIDE ____ _, 5. IU
I 67-64-1-------ACETONE \ 10. \U
\ 7 5-15-0-------CARBON D""I,...SU_L __ F=I-=D-=E-----~I 5. I U
I 75-35-4-------1,1-DICHLOROETHENE \ 5. \U
I 75-34-3-------1,1-DICHLOROETHANE I 5. IU
I 540-59-0-------1,2-DICHLOROETHENE (TOTAL)_\ 5. \U
I 67-66-3-------CHLOROFORM I 5. IU
I 107-06-2-------1,2-DICHLOROETHANE I 5. \U
I 78-93-3-------2-BUTANONE I 10. I U
I 71-55-6-------1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE I 5. IU
\ 56-23-5-------CARBON TETRACHLORIDE I 5. \U
I 108-05-4-------VINYL ACETATE I 10. I U
I 75-27-4-------BROMODICHLOROMETHANE I 5. I U
I 78-87-5-------1, 2-DICHLOROPROPANE I 5. I U
110061-01-5-------CIS-l,3-DICHLOROPROPENE I 5. \U
I 79-01-6-------TRICHLOROETHENE I 5. I U
I 124-48-1-------DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE I 5. IU
I 79-00-5-------1, 1, 2-TRICHLOROETHANE I 5. I U
I 71-43-2-------BENZENE I 5. \U
110061-02-6-------TRANS-l,3-DICHLOROPROPENE I 5. IU
I 75-25-2-------BROMOFORM I 5. IU
108-10-1-------4-METHYL-2-PENTANONE I 10. IU
591-78-6-------2-HEXANONE I 10. IU
127-18-4-------TETRACHLOROETHENE I 5. I U
79-34-5-------1,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE I 5. IU
108-88-3-------TOLUENE I 5. I U
Q
108-90-7-------CHLOROBENZENE I 3. I J
100-41-4-------ETHYLBENZENE I 5. !U
100-42-5-------STYRENE I 5. IU
1330-20-7-------XYLENE (TOTAL) I 5. IU _____________________ I ______ I __ _,
FORM I VOA
1 163
1/87 Rev.
lE EPA SAMPLE NO.
VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS
Contract: 68-W8-0045
HC138
r ab Name: IEA
Lab Code: IEA Case No.: 619-123 SAS No.: SDG No.: HC124
Lab Sample ID: Matrix: (soil/water) WATER
Sample wt/vol: 5.000 (g/mL) ML
Level: (low/med) LOW
% Moisture: not dee. 100.
Column: (pack/cap) CAP
Number TICS found: 2
Lab File ID: 0214218
Date Received: 2/ 9/90
Date Analyzed: 2/14/90
Dilution Factor: 1.00
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
(ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L
I I I
I CAS NUMBER I COMPOUND NAME I RT EST. CONC. Q
I-=====!============!===~====== ===
I 1. 75-43-4\METHANE, DICHLOROFLUORO-__ I
I 2. 1066-40-6 I SILANOL, TRIMETHYL-I
I 3. _____ _,
I 4. ______ ,
I 5. ____ --!
I 6. _____ _,
7. _____ _,
8. _____ _
9. ------· I
10. _____ _,
11. _____ _
I
I
1.72
7.22
I
I
I
I
12-------:--------------·----13. _____ _, _____________ _, ____ _,
14 ·--------------------.•----
15. --------------------'----
16 ·--------------------,•----.
17. ______ ---------------1-----: 18. ------·
19. ---------------------1------;
5.
10.
I
I
I
I
J
J
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I 20. ______ --------------:----:
21. ______ : ---------------!-----;----------,
22 ·------;--------------. ----------:--.
2 3. --------------------_____ , -------; ---:
24. ______ -------------------'-------:---'
25. --------------------____ _, -------'
26. --
27. ------
28. -------------------------:-------: ---' 29. ________________________ _, ______ _, __ _..
I "2 Q • ------
FORM I VOA-TIC 1/87 Rev.
• 1 164
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Lab Name: IEA, INC.
ENVIROFORMS/CLP 788
1
INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
SAMPLE NO.
HCS138
I Lab Code: IEA
SDG No. : HCS124
Lab Sample ID: 619-123-15
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Matrix (soil/water): WATER Client ID: #1 OUTERTIER COMB. INFL
Date Received: 02/09/90 Level (low/med): LOW
% Solids: 0.0
Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg dry weight}: UG/L
' I
I I I I I
I I I I t
CAS No. : Analyte :concentration:c: Q :M :
I I I I I
_7_4_2_9 ___ 9_0 ___ 5_) _A_l_um_1_· n_u_m_ -------; = ;---' -N-R)
7440-36-0 :Antimony : :_: NR:
7440-38-2 :Arsenic : :_: N.R:
7440-39-3 :Barium : :_: NR:
7440-41-7 :Beryllium : :_: N.R:
,7440-43-9 :cadmium : :_: NR:
:7440-70-2 :calcium : · :_: ,!IB
'7440-47-3 :chromium : 4.1 :y: :L
7440-48-4 :cobalt : :_: /N.R
7440-50-8 copper : :_: :NR
7439-89-6 Iron :_: :NR
7439-92-1 Lead :_: :N.R
7439-95-4 Magnesium :_: :NR
7439-96-5 Manganese :_: :NR,
7439-97-6 Mercury :_: :N.R:
7440-02-0 Nickel :_: :NR:
,7440-09-7 Potassium _______ :_: :NR:
:7782-49-2 ,selenium _______ :_: :NR:
:7440-22-4 :~s~i~l~v~e~r~--________ :_: :NR:
:7440-23-5 :~s~o~d~i~u~m..__ __________ :_: :NR:
:7440-28-0 :Thallium _______ :_: :NR:
/7440-62-2 :vanadium _______ :_: :NR:
:7440-66-6 :~z~i~n~c'-----________ :_: :NR:
______ :cyanide _______ :_: ]NR:
I clor Before: COLORLESS
I :lor After: COLORLESS
Clarity Before: CLEAR
Clarity After: CLEAR
Texture:
Artifacts:
I
I
ments:
#1 OUTERTIER COMB. INFL
FORM I -IN 7/88
1 013
lA EPA SAMPLE NO.
VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
HC140
Contract: 68-WS-0045 Lab Name: IEA
~ab Code: IEA Case No.: 619-123 SAS No.:
Matrix: (soil/water) WATER
SDG No.: HC124
Lab Sample ID:
Sample wt/vol: 5.000 (g/mL) ML
Level: (low/med) LOW
% Moisture: not dee. 100.
Column: (pack/cap) CAP
Lab File ID: 0214B03
Date Received: 2/ 9/90
Date Analyzed: 2/14/90
Dilution Factor: 1.00
CAS NO. COMPOUND
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
(ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L
I I I \ 74-87-3-------CHLOROMETHANE _______ \ 10. \U
\ 7 4-83-9-------BROMOMETHANE \ 10. I U
I 75-01-4-------VINYL CHLORIDE \ 10. \U
\ 75-00-3-------CHLOROETHANE \ 10. \U
\ 75-09-2-------METHYLENE CHLORIDE \ 5. \U
I 67-64-1-------ACETONE \ 10. \U
\ 75-15-0-------CARBON DISULFIDE I 5. \U
\ 75-35-4-------1,1-DICHLOROETHENE I 5. \U
I 75-34-3-------1,1-DICHLOROETHANE I 5. \U
\ 540-59-0-------1,2-DICHLOROETHENE (TOTAL)_\ 5. \U
I 67-66-3-------CHLOROFORM \ 5. IU
I 107-06-2-------1,2-DICHLOROETHANE \ 5. \U
I 78-93-3-------2-BUTANONE I 10. \U
\ 71-55-6-------1, 1, 1-TRICHLOROETHANE I 5. I U
\ 56-23-5-------CARBON TETRACHLORIDE \ 5. I U
I 108-05-4-------VINYL ACETATE \ 10. I U
I 75-27-4-------BROMODICHLOROMETHANE I 5. IU
I 78-87-5-------1, 2-DICHLOROPROPANE I 5. I U
!10061-01-5-------CIS-l,3-DICHLOROPROPENE __ \ 5. \U
I 79-01-6-------TRICHLOROETHENE I 5. \U
I 124-48-1-------DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE I 5. \U
I 79-00-5-------1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE \ 5. \U
I 71-43-2-------BENZENE I 5. IU
\10061-02-6-------TRANS-l,3-DICHLOROPROPENE I 5. \U
I 75-25-2-------BROMOFORM I 5. I U
I 108-10-1-------4-METHYL-2-PENTANONE I 10. I U
I 591-78-6-------2-HEXANONE I 10. \U
\ 127-18-4-------TETRACHLOROETHENE \ 5. \U
I 79-34-5-------1,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE I 5. IU
I 108-88-3-------TOLUENE I 5. I U
I 108-90-7-------CHLOROBENZENE I 5. I U
I 100-41-4-------ETHYLBENZENE I 5. \U
I ::.oo-42-5-------STYRENE I 5. I U
I 1330-20-7--------XYLENE (TOTAL) \ 5. IU
Q
I I ______ I __
FORM I VOA 1 205 1 / 87 Rev.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Lab Name: IEA
,._,ab Code: IEA
lE
VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS
Contract: 68-W8-0045
Case No.: 619-123 SAS No.:
EPA SAMPLE NO.
HC140
Matrix: (soil/water) WATER
SDG No.: HC124
Lab Sample ID:
Sample wt/vol: 5.000 (g/mL) ML Lab File ID: 0214B03
I Level: (low/med) LOW Date Received: 2/ 9/90
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
% Moisture: not dee. 100. Date Analyzed:
Column: (pack/cap) CAP Dilution Factor:
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
Number TICs found: l
I
CAS NUMBER I COMPOUND NAME
(ug/L or
=======!============
1. 1066-40-6\SILANOL, TRIMETHYL-2. ______ l _____________ i
3. ______ I ____________ _,
4. ______ I ____________ _ s. ______ l ____________ __,
6. ______ I _____________ ,
7. ______ I ____________ __,
8. ______ I _____________ ,
9. ______ I ____________ _,
10 . ______ ! _____________ ,
11. ______ \ ____________ _,
12. ______ I, ____________ _
13 . ______ ! ____________ _!
ug/Kg) UG/L
RT EST.
7.33
I
I
I
I
I
I
2/14/90
1.00
CONC. Q
8. J
I
14. ______ I ________________________ , __ _
15 . ______ I _____________ ----------'--16 . ______ \ ________________ _
17. ______ I ________________ _
18 . ______ ! _____________ ----19 . ______ I ________________ _
20. ______ 1 _____________ , ____ :
21. ______ I ____________ _, ___ _
22. ______ I _____________ , ____ :
23 . ______ \, -------------'----: 24. ______ I _____________ , ___ _
I
I
25. \ ____________ _, ____ ,
26. ______ ,l _____________ ----------:---' 27. __ ~ ___ l _____________ , __________ :---1
28. [ _____________ , ____ :------:---'
29. l _____________ , ____ :--------J 30. ______ I ____________ _
I ----: --------_______ , ___ ,
FORM I VOA-TIC 1/87 Rev.
, .. 1 206
1B EPA SAMPLE NO.
SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
HC140
,b Name: IEA Contract: 68-WS-0045
c.ab Code: IEA Case No.: 619-123 SAS No.: SDG No.: HC124
:•iatrix: (soil/water) WATER
Sample wt/vol: 1000.0 (g/mL) ML
:..evel: (low/med) LOW
% Moisture: not dee. 100. dee. ---
Extraction: (SepF/Cont/Sonc) CONT
Lab Sample ID:
Lab File ID: 0222D12
Date Received: 2/ 9/90
Date Extracted: 2/10/90
Date Analyzed: 2/23/90
GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) N pH: 6.0 Dilution Factor: 1.00
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
CAS NO. COMPOUND (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L
I I
I 108-95-2-------Phenol=-a---:-:---,:--:-...,...,.----\
I lll-44-4-------bis(2-Chloroethyl)ether __ I
I 95-57-8-------2-Chlorophenol I
I 541-73-1-------1,3-Dichlorobenzene I
I 106-46-7-------1,4-Dichlorobenzene I
\ 100-51-6-------Benzyl alcohol I
\ 95-50-1-------1,2-Dichlorobenzene I
I 95-48-7-------2-Methylphenol I
I 108-60-l-------bis(2-Chloroisopropyl)ether I
I · 106-44-5-------4-Methylphenol I
621-64-7-------N-Nitroso-di-n-propylamine I
67-72-1-------Hexachloroethane I
98-95-3-------Nitrobenzene I
78-59-1-------Isophorone I
88-75-5-------2-Nitrophenol \
105-67-9-------2,4-Dimethylphenol I
65-85-0-------Benzoic acid I
lll-91-l-------bis(2-Chloroethoxy)methane \
120-83-2-------2,4-Dichlorophenol I
120-82-1-------1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene I
91-20-3-------Naphthalene I
106-47-8-------4-Chloroaniline I
87-68-3-------Hexachlorobutadiene I
59-50-7-------4-Chloro-3-methylphenol __ I
91-57-6-------2-Methylnaphthalene I
77-47-4-------Hexachlorocyclopentadiene I
88-06-2-------2,4,6-Trichlorophenol I
95-95-4-------2,4,5-Trichlorophenol \
91-58-7-------2-Chloronaphthalene \
88-74-4-------2-Nitroaniline I
~31-11-3-------Dimethylphthalate \
208-96-8-------Acenaphthylene ______ _
506-20-2-------2,6-Dinitrotoluene ____ _
FORM I SV-1
Q
I I
10. IU I
10. IU I
10. IU I
10. IU I
10. IU I
10. IU. I
10. IU I
10. IU I
10. IU I
10. IU I
10. IU I
10. IU I
10. \U I
10. \U I.
10. IU I
10. \U I so. \U I
10. \U I
10. \U I
10. IU I
10. \U I
10. \U I
10. \U I
10. IU I
10. IU I
10. IU I
10. IU I
50. IU I
10. \U I
50. IU
10. IU
10. IU
:. 0 . \U
I
2 056 l/87 Rev.
•1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-I
I
I
:.c EPA SAMPLE NO.
Sfu~IVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
HC140
i.,ab tl arne: I EA Contract: 68-WS-0045
,,ab Code: I EA Case No.: 619-123 SAS No.: SDG No. : HC124
Lab Sample ID: I•!atrix: ( soil/water l WATER
Sample wt/vol: 1000.0 (g/mL) ML Lab File ID: 0222D12
Date Received: 2/ 9/90
Date Extracted: 2/10/90
Date Analyzed: 2/23/90
i.,evel: (low/med) LOW
% Moisture: not dee. 100. dee. __ _
Extraction: (SepF/Cont/Soncl CONT
GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) N pH: 6.0 Dilution Factor: 1.00
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
CAS NO. COMPOUND (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L Q
I
99-09-2-------3-Nitroaniline _______ l
83-32-9-------Acenaphthene ________ l
51-28-5-------2,4-Dinitrophenol _____ I
100-02-7--~----4-Nitrophenol _______ \
132-64-9-------Dibenzofuran. ________ l
121-14-2-------2,4-Dinitrotoluene _____ l
84-66-2-------Diethylphthalate,_-~,---,---I
7005-72-3-------4-Chlorophenyl-phenylether_l
86-73-7-------Fluorene~~--------\
100-01-6-------4-Nitroaniline --,--,--,--..,..--'
534-52-1-------4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol_l
86-30-6-------N-Nitrosodiphenylamine (ll I
101-55-3-------4-Bromophenyl-phenylether -,
118-74-1-------Hexachlorobenzene _____ \
87-86-5-------Pentachlorophenol _____ I
35-01-8-------Phenanthrene ________ l
120-12-7-------Anthracene~~-=-------' 84-74-2-------Di-n-butylphthalate ____ I
206-44-0-------Fluoranthene ________ l
129-00-0-------Pyrene ___________ !
35-68-7-------Butylbenzylphthalate ____ l
91-94-1-------3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine ___ l
56-55-3-------Benzo(a)anthracene _____ l
218-01-9-------chrysene_,..,---=-,...--,,-,,-,:----\
ll7-81-7-------bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate I
117-84-0-------Di-n-octylphthalate ---==! 205-99-2-------Benzo(b)fluoranthene ___ _
207-08-9-------Benzo(k)fluoranthene ___ _
50-32-8-------Benzo(a)pyrene ______ _
193-39-5-------Indeno(l,2,3-cd)pyrene __ _
53-70-3-------Dibenz\a,h)anthracene
191-24-2-------Benzo(g,h,i)perylene ___ _
\l) -Cannot be separated from diphenylarnine
FORM I SV-2
I
50. \U
10. \U
50. \U
50. \U
10. \U
10. \U
10. \U
10. \U
10. \U
50. \U
50. IU
10. \U
10. \U
10. \U
50. IU
10. \U
10. :u
10. IU
10. \U
10. IU
10. IU
20. \U
10. \U
10. \U
10. \U
10. IU
10. \U
lO. \U
10. :u
10. IU
10. \U
10. \U
1/87 Rev.
2 057
lF
SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS
Lab Name: IEA Contract: 6B-WB-0045
EPA SAMPLE NO.
HC140
i...ab Code: IEA case No.: 619-123 SAS No.:
Matrix: I soil/water) WATER
SDG No. : HC124
Lab Sample ID:
Sample wt/vol: 1000.0 (g/mL) ML
Level: (low/med) LOW
% Moisture: not dee. 100. dee. __
Extraction: (SepF/Cont/Sonc) CONT
Lab File ID: 0222Dl2
Date Received: 2/ 9/90
Date Extracted: 2/10/90
Date Analyzed: 2/23/90
GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) N pH: 6.0 Dilution Factor: 1.00
Number TICs found: 3
I
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
(ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L
CAS NUMBER I COMPOUND NAME RT EST. CONC. Q
=====\============
l . --I UNKNOWN
2 • --I UNKNOWN ---------3 • --I UNKNOWN
9.12
11.05
13.95
4. ______ l _____________ c---~
5. ______ I ________________ _
6. ______ l _____________ , ___ _i
10. J
100. J
20. J
I
7. ______ I ____________ ~-----,
B. ______ l ____________ ~----:------j ___ ,.
9. ______ I _____________ , ___ _, _____ _, __ ...,
10. ______ I ____________ ~ ___ _, _____ _, __ _
ll. I -------------
12. -------: --------------;------:-------c---
13. -------------------~ -----c -------: ---,
14---------------------'----~-------c---c
15. --------------------' ____ _, -------.' __ _,
16 ·--------------------'-------------:
~?. ______ --------------•----->--------:----:
18. ______ --------------'------------
19. --------------------:----:-----~---:
20. -------------------~ -----c ----------o
21. --------------------: -----: -------, ---:
22. ---------------------'-------'-----------' 23. ________________________ ! ______ , __ _
24.______ \ ________ ~
25. ______ -----------------'--------26. ! _______ _
:7. ! _______ _
1 2 8. .\ ______ ---'
29. '------:--
1 3 o. \ 1------
--------------------------
FORM I SV-TIC l/87 Rev.
, 2 058
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
lD EPA SAMPLE NO.
?ESTIC!DE ORGANICS .;NALYSIS DATA SHEET
HC140
Contract: 68-WB-0045
Lab Code: I EA Case No.: 619-123 SAS No.l
:·lat.rix: I soil/water) WATER
Sample wt/vol: 1000. (g/mL)ML
Level: (low/med) LOW
% Moisture: not dec.100. dee. 0.
Extraction: (SepF/Cont/Sonc) SEPF
GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) N pH: 6.0
SDG No.: HC124
Lab Sample ID:
Lab File ID: DBSA5799
Date Received: 2/ 9/90
Date Extracted: 2/10/90
Date Analyzed: 2/20/90
Dilution Factor: 1. 00
CAS NO. COMPOUND
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
(ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L Q
I
319-84-6-----alpha-BHC .050 \U
319-85-7-----beta-BHC .050 \U
319-86-8-----delta-BHC .050 \U
58-89-9-----gamma-BHC .050 \U
76-44-8-----Heptachlor .050 \U
309-00-2-----Aldrin .050 \U
1024-57-3-----Heptachlor epoxide .050 \U
959-98-8---·--Endosulfan I .050 \U
60-57-1-----Dieldrin .10 \U
72-55-9-----4,4'-DDE .10 \U
72-20-8-----Endrin . 10 IU
33213-65-9-----Endosulfan II .10 \U
72-54-8-----4,4'-DDD .10 \U
1031-07-8-----Endosulfan sulfate .10 \U
50-29-3-----4,4'-DDT .10 \U
72-43-5-----Methoxychlor .so \U
53494-70-5-----Endrin ketone .10 \U
5103-71-9-----alpha-Chlordane .50 \U
Sl03-74-2-----gamma-Chlordane .so IU
8001-35-2-----Toxaphene 1.0 \U
~2674-11-2-----Aroclor-1016 .so \U
11104-28-2-----Aroclor-1221 .so \U
11141-16-5-----Aroclor-1232 .50 \U
S3469-21-9-----Aroclor-l242 .so \U
12672-29-6-----Aroclor-1248 . so \U
~1097-69-1-----Aroclor-1254 l.0 iU
11096-82-5-----Aroclor-1260 l..O \U
I
3 019
FORM I PEST 1/87 Rev.
ENVIROFORMS/CLP 788
1
SAMPLE NO.
INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
Lab Name: IEA, INC.
Lab Code: IEA
SDG No.: HCS124
HCS140
Lab Sample ID: 619-123-17
Matrix (soil/water): WATER Client ID: #7 OUTER EFFLUENT
Level (low/med) : LOW
% Solids: 0.0
Concentration
' ' :cAS No.
I
' :7429-90-5
:7440-36-0
:7440-38-2
:7440-39-3
:7440-41-7
:7440-43-9
:7440-70-2
7440-47-3
7440-48-4
7440-50-8
7439-89-6
7439-92-1
7439-95-4
7439-96-5
7439-97-6
7440-02-0
:7440-09-7
:7782-49-2
:7440-22-4
:7440-23-5
:7440-28-0
:7440-62-2
:7440-66-6
olor Before: COLORLESS
::or Af:er: COLORLESS
·men ts:
#7 OUTER EFFLUENT
Date Received: 02/09/90
Units (ug/L or mg/kg dry weight):
' ' I I
Analyte Concentration:c:
I ' ,_,
Aluminum 71. 2 : 1I:
AntiIDQn:t: 40. 1 :y:
AJ;:S!lDiC .0 Ult
Bai;:ium lJl :~:
Bei;::i::llium .4 : .a:
Cadmium 3.2 : Y.:
,calcium 26400 I ' ,_,
:cni;:omium : 1!:
:cobslt 10. 7 :Jll
:c21212~.: 3,9 : Y.:
:Ii;:on J3.5 : .a:
Lead 2.3 ' _,
Magnesium 8340 I _,
Manganese 303 _:E
Mercury 0.20 U' _,
Nickel 18.0 U' _,
Potassium 5500 ' _,
Selenium .2 U' _,
:silvei;: 5.9 1Y:
:sodium 41900 ' ' ,_,
:Thallium 0.00 ' ' ,_,
:vanadium 8.1 :u:
:zinc 17.7 :~:
:c:i::anide 10.0 :JJ:N
Clarity Before: CLEAR
Clarity After: CLEAR
FORM I -IN
Q
UG/L
I ' ' ' :M ' ' I ' ,_,
lLt
tL :L :L
lL :L :L :Ll :1:... :.L :1:...
lL
lL :L :cv1 :.L: :1:.__:
:L: :.L:
'p ' ,_,
:L: :.L: :L:
lL:
Texture:
Artifacts:
7/88
l 01~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
:1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
ENVIROFORMS/CLP 788
1
INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
~A5E ,Jo I '11'/-11.fZ.
SDG No.: HCS158
SAMPLE NO.
HCS164
Lab Name: IEA, INC.
:.ab Code: IEA
Matrix (soil/water): WATER
Lab Sample ID: 619-142-1
Client ID: #1-0UTER TIER COMB. INFL.
Level (low/med):
% Solids:
LOW
0.0
Date Received: 03/09/90
Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg dry weight): UG/L
I
I
:cAS No.
I
I
:7429-90-5
:7440-36-0
:7440-38-2
:7440-39-3
7440-41-7
7440-43-9
7440-70-2
7440-47-3
7440-48-4
7440-50-8
7439-89-6
:7439-92-1
:7439-95-4
:7439-96-5
:7439-97-6
'7440-02-0
7440-09-7
7782-49-2
7440-22-4
7440-23-5
7440-28-0
,7440-62-2
:7440-66-6
)lor Before: COLORLESS
-After: LT.BROWN
Jmments:
I I I I
I I I I
I Analyte :concentration:c: I
I I I
I ,_,
:Aluminum I I ,_,
:Antimony I I ,_,
:Arsenic I I ,_,
:Barium I I ,_,
:Beryllium I I ,_,
:cadmium I I ,_,
:calcium I I ,_,
:c1iromiym 4,l :u:
:cobalt I I ,_,
:copper I I ,_,
: Iron I I ,_,
:Lead I I ,_,
:Magnesium ' ' ,_,
:Manganese ' ' ,_,
:Mercury ' ' ,_,
:Nickel ' ' ,_,
:Potassium ' ' ,_,
:selenium ' I ,_,
:silver ' ' ,_,
:sodium I I ,_,
:Thallium ' ' ,_,
:vanadium ' ' ,_,
!Zinc ' ' ,_,
:cyanide ' ' ,_,
Clarity Before: CLEAR
Clarity After: CLEAR
#1-0UTER TIER COMB. INFL.
FORM I -IN
I I I I
Q :M I
I
I I ,_,
:.?iB.: :zm:
I .tm: .tm:
HR'
HR
.HR
.L
HR
,.HR
:NR
:.HR
:.HR
:.HR
]NR 1
:.tm
:NR
:NR
:.HR
:NR
:NR
:NR
[NR]
:NRt
Texture:
Artifacts:
1 008
7/88
ENVIROFORMS/CLP 788
1
SAMPLE NO.
INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
Lab Name: IEA, INC.
Lab Code: IEA
<:A:St: No: <,1<;-/1./1,
SDG No.: HCS158
HCS166
Matrix (soil/water): WATER
Lab Sample ID: 619-142-3
Client ID: #7-0UTER EFFLUENT
Level (low/med).:
% Solids:
LOW
0.0
Date Received: 03/09/90
Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg dry weight): UG/L
I
' :cAS No.
7429-90-5
7440-36-0
7440-38-2
7440-39-3
7440-41-7
7440-43-9
7440-70-2
7440-47-3
,7440-48-4
:7440-50-8
:7439-89-6
:7439-92-1
:7439-95-4
:7439-96-5
7439-97-6
7440-02-0
7440-09-7
7782-49-2
7440-22-4
7440-23-5
,7440-28-0
:7440-62-2
:7440-66-6
:olor Before: COLORLESS
·r After: COLORLESS
:omments:
#7-0UTER EFFLUENT
I I I I
' ' ' ' ' Analyte :concentration:c: ' ' ' I
' ,_,
:Aluminum ' ' ,_,
:Antimony ' ' ,_,
!Arsenic I ' ,_,
:Barium ' I ,_,
lBervllium ' ' ,_,
:cadmium· ' ' ,_,
:calcium ' ' ,_,
:chromium 4,1 :y:
:cobalt ' I ,_,
:copper ' _,
:rron ' _,
:Lead ' _,
:Magnesium ' _,
Manganese ' _,
Mercury ' _,
Nickel ' _,
Potassium ' ' ,_,
selenium ' ' ,_,
Silver ' ' ,_,
Sodium ' ' ,_,
Thallium ' ' ,_,
vanadium ' ' ,_,
Zinc ' ' ,_,
Cyanide ' ' ,_,
Clarity Before: CLEAR
Clarity After: CLEAR
FORM I -IN
I ' Q :M
' ,_
:.rm : .rm. :HR :.rm :.rm : .rm. :rm:
'L' ' ' am:
INR] :NR: :rm:
lNR: :.rm:
lNR] :NR:
lNR: :.rm:
l NE.: INR: :NR: :NR:
[NR:
:NR]
Texture:
Artifacts:
1 010
7/88
I
1:
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I