NCD003446721_19900301_Celeanse Corporation - Shelby Fiber_FRBCERCLA RA_Quarterly Status Report OU-1 Remedial Action Vol. 1 of 2 Nov 1989 - Feb 1990-OCR

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Westinghouse Environmental
and Geotechnical Services, Inc.
5050H185
4000 DeKalb Technology Parkway, NE
Suile 250
Atlanta, Georgia 30340
(404) 45~9309
FAX [phone]
QUARTERLY STATUS REPORT
OPERABLE UNIT 1 REMEDIAL ACTION
WESTINGHOUSE PROJECT 4124-85-0S0H
DOCUMENT CONTROL SS0S0N-0219
VOLUME 1 OF 2
Prepared For:
HOECHST CELANESE CORPORATION
Shelby, North Carolina
Prepared By:
WESTINGHOUSE ENVIRONMENTAL AND
GEOTECHNICAL SERVICES, INC.
Atlanta, G~~r:_~
February },%) ~ 10
Everett 1W. Glover,r., P.E.
Project Manager
A Westinghouse Electric Corporation subsidiary
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Operable Unit 1 Quarterly Status Report
November 1989 to February 1990
Hoechst Celanese/Shelby, NC
Westinghouse Project 4124-85-0S0H
Document Control 85050H-0219
Page i
List of Figures
List of Plates
List of Appendices
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
1. 0 INTRODUCTION
1.1 Site Description
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.2 Site History and Regulatory Status
1.3 Description of Operable Unit 1 Facilities
1.3.1 Inner Tier Treatment System
1.3.2 Outer Tier Treatment system
2.0 INNER TIER TREATMENT SYSTEM
2.1 Influent Water Quality
2.2 Inner Tier Treatment Processes
2.3 Contract Laboratory Program (CLP) Data
2.3.1 Influent/Effluent Data
2.3.2 Sludge Dewatering -Metal Treatment
3.0 OUTER TIER TREATMENT SYSTEM
3.1 Influent Water Quality
3.2 outer Tier Treatment Processes
3.3 Contract Laboratory Program (CLP) Influent/
Effluent Data
4.0 PUMPING SYSTEM OPERATION AND HYDROLOGIC EFFECTS
OF PUMPING
4.1 Inner Tier System
4.1.1 Flow Data
4.1.2 Groundwater Elevations
5050H185
ii
iii
iv
ES-1
1-1
1-1
1-3
1-7
1-9
1-14
2-1
2-1
2-1
2-7
2-7
2-11
3-1
3-1
3-1
3-2
4-1
4-2
4-2
4-3
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
s.o
6.0
7.0
4.2
Operable Unit 1 Quarterly Status Report
November 1989 to February 1990
Hoechst Celanese/Shelby, NC
Westinghouse Project 4124-85-050H
Document Control 85050H-0219
Page ii
Outer Tier System 4-4
4.2.1 Flow Data 4-4
4.2.2 Groundwater Elevations 4-6
GROUNDWATER QUALITY 5-1
5.1 On-Site Groundwater Quality 5-1
5. 1.1 Background Groundwater Area 5-1
5. 1.2 Inner Tier Area 5-2
5 .1. 3 Outer Tier Area 5-5
5.2 Off-site Groundwater Quality 5-8
QUALITY ASSURANCE/QUALITY CONTROL 6-1
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 7-1
5050H185
I
I
I
I
I Figure
1-1
I 1-2
I 1-3
1-4 I
I 2-1
I 2-2
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I 5050H185
I
Operable Unit 1 Quarterly Status Report
November 1989 to February 1990
Hoechst Celanese/Shelby, NC
Westinghouse Project 4124-85-0S0H
Document Control 85050H-0219
Page iii
List of Figures
Title Page
Site Location Map 1-2
Well Location Map-Operable Unit 1 Facilities 1-8
Groundwater Treatment System Schematic 1-10
Flow Diagram
Process and Instrumentation Diagram 1-11
Operable Unit 1 Facilities
Inner Tier Influent vs SBR Effluent Daily 2-5
COD
Inner Tier Influent vs SBR Effluent Rolling 2-6
Weekly Average COD
I
I
I
I
I Table
2-1
I 2-2
I 2-3
I 5-1
I 5-2
I 5-3
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I 5050H185
I
Operable Unit 1 Quarterly status Report
November 1989 to February 1990
Hoechst Celanese/Shelby, NC
Westinghouse Project 4124-85-050H
Document Control 85050H-0219
Page iv
List of Tables
Title
Influent and SBR Effluent COD Data
Compounds/Analytes
Effluent Samples:
Extraction Tiers
Detected in Influent/
Inner and Outer
Compounds Detected in Sludge Samples
Compounds/Analyte Detected in Inner Tier
Monitor Wells
Compounds/Analyte Detected in Outer Tier
Monitor Wells
Compounds/Analyte Detected in Off-Site Wells
2-3
2-10
2-12
5-3
5-6
5-9
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Plate
1
2
3
4
5050H185
Operable Unit 1 Quarterly status Report
November 1989 to February 1990
Hoechst Celanese/Shelby, NC
Westinghouse Project 4124-85-050H
Document Control 85050H-0219
Page v
List of Plates
Title
Pre-excavation Groundwater Elevations
July 25, 1989
Interpreted Groundwater Elevations
December 6, 1989
Interpreted Groundwater Elevations
January 4, 1990
Interpreted Groundwater Elevations
February 5, 1990
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Appendix
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
5050H185
Operable Unit 1 Quarterly Status Report
November 1989 to February 1990
Hoechst Celanese/Shelby, NC
Westinghouse Project 4124-85-050H
Document Control 85050H-0219
Page vi
List of Appendices
Title
Inner Tier Influent/Effluent Water Quality
Inner Tier Influent/Effluent CLP Water Quality
SBR/Filter Press Sludge Analyses
Outer Tier Influent/Effluent water Quality
Outer Tier Influent/Effluent CLP Water Quality
Piezometer Boring Logs
Inner and outer Tier Flow Data and Water Level
Elevations
CLP Groundwater Data
QA/QC Data on Blanks, Matrix Spikes and Matrix
Spike Duplicates
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Operable Unit 1 Quarterly status Report
November 1989 to February 1990
Hoechst Celanese/Shelby, NC
Westinghouse Project 4124-85-0SOH
Document Control 85050H-0219
Page ES-1
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Hoechst Celanese is conducting remedial actions to address
groundwater contamination at the Shelby, North Carolina site.
Source remediation is being addressed under a second Operable
Unit.
From the second quarter of analytical and flow data, the
following information was observed:
o The inner tier extraction system continued to
experience problems during the second quarter.
Operation of the system has been improved through
replacement of pumps and control systems in four of the
wells during late January. The new pumps are working
satisfactorily. Pumping efficiency and the accuracy of
flow meter readings should thus improve during future
quarters.
0
0
0
5050H185
From November, 1989 through January, 1990, the inner
and outer tier wells have pumped approximately 250,000
and 6,500,000 gallons respectively. The inner tier
quantity may be overestimated because of problems with
flow meters.
Pumping in inner and outer tier wells produced little
or no drawdown in most monitor wells. Water level
rises of up to almost 5 feet were recorded for several
wells during the latter half of the quarter. These
trends are at least partially attributable to increased
rainfall during the second half of the quarter.
Well drawdown data continue to indicate the need for
two additional extraction wells and six piezometers as
proposed in the first quarterly report.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
0
0
5050H185
Operable Unit 1 Quarterly Status Report
November 1989 to February 1990
Hoechst Celanese/Shelby, NC
Westinghouse Project 4124-85-0S0H
Document Control 85050H-0219
Page ES-2
The sequencing batch reactor (SBR) began experiencing
problems during the third week of October 1989. The
treatment system therefore did not perform as well as
it did in the first quarter. A sampling and testing
program has been proposed to define the source of these
problems. The inner and outer tier air stripping
towers and activated carbon filters have continued to
function properly.
The results of second round sampling of potable supply
wells showed little evidence of contamination. The
number and concentrations of detected compounds and
analytes is less than that detected in the first round
of sampling.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1.1 Site Description
Operable Unit 1 Quarterly Status Report
November 1989 to February 1990
Hoechst Celanese/Shelby, NC
Westinghouse Project 4124-85-050H
Document Control 85050H-0219
Page 1-1
1.0 INTRODUCTION
The Hoechst Celanese site is a 469-acre property occupied by a
polyester resin and fiber production facility (Figure 1-1). The
site is located in south-central Cleveland County east of North
Carolina Highway 198. It is approximately 1 mile north of
Earl, North Carolina and 6 miles south of Shelby. The nearest
major city is Charlotte, North Carolina, 35 miles east of
Shelby.
The plant facilities consist of the plant production area,
wastewater treatment area, former waste disposal areas, former
sludge landfarm area, and recreation and wooded areas. The
majority of the land surface reflects cultural modification by
construction, and by cutting and filling. The original soil
profile has probably been either truncated or covered across
much of the site, and was never conclusively identified as
undisturbed during the field investigations of the Remedial
Investigation (RI). The plant production area is predominantly
covered with buildings and paved or gravelled areas. However,
to the east, toward the wastewater treatment area, the site
5050H185
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~ Westinghouse Environmental
'@J and Geotechnical Services, Inc.
FIGURE 1-1
SITE LOCATION MAP
HC/SHELBY
""
{
2000
SC>.l.E HI FEET
WESTINGHOUSE PROJECT 4124-85-OSOH
4000
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Operable Unit 1 Quarterly Status Report
November 1989 to February 1990
Hoechst Celanese/Shelby, NC
Westinghouse Project 4124-85-050H
Document Control 85050H-0219
Page 1-3
becomes more open, with the majority of the land covered by
impoundments, with grass and access roads in between. The
former sludge landfarm is north of the plant production area and
is overgrown with coarse grasses. The recreation area and
wooded area to the south have no facilities related to the plant
process.
Adjacent land use is rural. Some residences are located within
1 mile of the site.
1.2 Site History and Regulatory Status
Fiber Industries, Inc., a joint venture of Celanese Corporation
and Imperial Chemicals, Incorporated, (ICI), was the original
owner of the plant and operated it from 1960 until 1983 when the
Celanese Corporation bought out ICI's share of the facility.
American Hoechst and Celanese merged in 1987 to form Hoechst
Celanese. It is now operated as the Hoechst Celanese, Shelby
Facility. Operations at the Shelby facility began in April,
1960. Manufacturing operations included the production of
polyester polymer resin and filament yarn. The principal
chemicals involved in polymer production are dimethyl
terephthalate and ethylene glycol.
SOSOH185
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Operable Unit 1 Quarterly Status Report
November 1989 to February 1990
Hoechst Celanese/Shelby, NC
Westinghouse Project 4124-85-0SOH
Document Control 85050H-0219
Page 1-4
The Hoechst Celanese wastewater treatment plant was constructed
in phases concurrent with the manufacturing plant, and became
fully operational in the mid-1960's. In 1973, the wastewater
treatment plant was expanded with the addition of a polishing
pond, two emergency spill ponds, and an additional aeration
basin. The treated effluent from the wastewater treatment plant
is piped to a discharge point on Buffalo creek.
Several areas around the plant have been used for waste
disposal. Normal plant wastes (primarily polyester and
miscellaneous trash) were disposed of in old burning pits
located just north of the aeration basins. North and east of
the burning pits, glycol recovery unit (GRU) sludge was buried
in trenches during the early 1960's.
Two other areas of buried waste are located to the north of the
main plant. The polymer and fiber landfill contains primarily
non-hazardous inert materials such as excavation spoil,
construction waste, and yarn. The construction debris landfill
contains items such as old cinder blocks and steel strapping
bands.
Investigation of the Hoechst Celanese site began in October 1981
when Hoechst Celanese contracted with Westinghouse to install 23
5050H185
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
operable Unit 1 Quarterly Status Report
November 1989 to February 1990
Hoechst Celanese/Shelby, NC
Westinghouse Project 4124-85-050H
Document Control 85050H-0219
Page 1-5
groundwater monitor wells. In conjunction with the groundwater
monitor well installation program, Westinghouse also conducted a
hydrogeologic evaluation. Subsequently, Hoechst Celanese
initiated a groundwater sampling and analysis program under the
supervision of Davis & Floyd Laboratories, Inc.
In June 1986, the Hoechst Celanese, Shelby Facility was placed
on EPA's National Priorities List (NPL). Prior to that action,
a final Order on Consent for Westinghouse to prepare an RI/FS on
behalf of Hoechst Celanese was signed on March 10, 1986.
The RI report for the site was finalized in July 1987. The
identified areas needing remediation were the former glycol
recovery unit waste pits, other adjacent disposal pits and
stream sediments, and groundwater contaminated by the waste in
those pits. Due to the groundwater contamination and the
potential for it to move off site, EPA approved Westinghouse's
proposal for a two-phased clean-up action. These two phases are
identified as Operable Unit 1 (OU 1), which focused on
remediating contaminated groundwater, and Operable Unit 2
(OU 2), which addressed remediation of the sludges and soils
associated with the former glycol recovery unit trenches, the
burn pit areas, and stream sediments.
The Operable Unit FS for the groundwater was completed in
5050H185
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Operable Unit 1 Quarterly Status Report
November 1989 to February 1990
Hoechst Celanese/Shelby, NC
Westinghouse Project 4124-85-050H
Document Control 85050H-0219
Page 1-6
February 1988. The Record of Decision (ROD) for OU 1 Remedial
Action was signed March 23, 1988, and required extraction and
treatment of contaminated groundwater associated with the site.
Hoechst Celanese agreed to conduct the Remedial Action for OU 1
in a partial Consent Decree dated June 30, 1988. Construction
of the extraction and treatment systems was completed in August
1989, and they are presently operational.
The FS for OU 2 Remedial Action was final in February 1989.
This remedial action will address contaminant source control at
the site. The Consent Decree on OU 2 was signed by Hoechst
Celanese on June 19, 1989, and lodged with the court in November
1989.
Operable Unit 2 remediation activities include the following:
o excavation of approximately 2000 cubic yards of glycol
recovery unit (GRU) sludges. The 2000 cubic yards
includes a known GRU volume of 1500 cubic yards plus an
additional 1 foot of soil below the GRU/soil interface
0
0
0
0
0
5050H185
excavation of approximately 1200 cubic yards of burn
pit residuals
excavation of approximately 600 cubic yards of plastic
chips
excavation of approximately 110 cubic yards of stream
sediments
incineration of GRU sludges and associated soils
chemical fixation (solidification) of incinerator ash,
plastic chips, burn pit residuals, and stream sediments
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Operable Unit 1 Quarterly Status Report
November 1989 to February 1990
Hoechst Celanese/Shelby, NC
Westinghouse Project 4124-85-050H
Document Control 85050H-0219
Page 1-7
0 on-site disposal of solidified materials
o regrading and revegetating, where necessary
o monitoring
The anticipated timing for beginning Operable Unit 2 remedial
activities is third quarter (November), 1990; completion of site
excavation, incineration and soldification of residuals will
extend into the second quarter (May), 1991.
1.3 Description of Operable Unit 1 Facilities
Groundwater is being extracted from a relatively uncontaminated
"outer tier'' of wells located near the southern and eastern
plant boundaries and from a heavily contaminated "inner tier" of
wells located adjacent to, and hydraulically downgradient from,
the source areas west of the wastewater polishing ponds. The
general location of the OU 1 facilities are shown on Figure 1-2.
The inner tier of extraction wells are being operated at the
maximum rate possible, and the outer tier are being pumped at
the minimum rate necessary to produce overlapping cones of
influence. This pumping plan was developed to: 1) collect the
more highly contaminated groundwater at the maximum rate and as
close to the source as possible, and 2) to have the minimal
effect on nearby drinking water wells from operation of the
5050H185
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I -•~ NO. DATE REVISIONS
I
I
~D-58
---
BY WESTINGHOUSE PROJECT 4124-85-0SOH
DESIGNED BY
DRAWN BY
CHECKED BY
FILE NO. 5050N02
DATE
-----------------
Westinghouse Environmental
and Geotechnical Services, Inc.
Hoechst Celanese Corporation
Shelby, N.C.
.... INNER / OUTER TIER EXTRACTION WELLS
O EXISTING MONITOR WELLS
A EXISTING PIEZOMETERS
C8:) GROUNDWATER TREATMENT
SYSTEM LOCATION
0 200 400
SCALE IN FEET
FIGURE 1-2
WELL LOCATION MAP-OPERABLE
UNIT 1 F AGILITIES
HG/SHELBY
800
WESTINGHOUSE PROJECT 4124-85-OSOH
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
outer tier wells.
Operable Unit 1 Quarterly Status Report
November 1989 to February 1990
Hoechst Celanese/Shelby, NC
Westinghouse Project 4124-85-050H
Document Control 85050H-0219
Page 1-9
The outer tier extraction and treatment system consists of eight
extraction wells, an equalization tank, an air stripping tower,
and a granulated activated carbon (GAC) adsorption system. The
inner tier extraction and treatment system consists of nine
extraction wells, an equalization tank, a metals treatment
process, a sequencing batch reactor (SBR) with associated manual
nutrient and chemical feeds and sludge handling equipment, an
air stripping tower, and a GAC adsorption system. The treatment
systems are enclosed in a metal building and installed on a
common concrete pad located between the polishing ponds of the
existing plant wastewater treatment system. The groundwater
treatment area has provisions for spill containment and control
using curbing and a collection sump. The treatment system
schematic flow diagram is shown in Figure 1-3, and the process
and instrumentation diagram (P&ID) is shown on Figure 1-4.
1.3.1 Inner Tier Treatment System
Neutralization/Equalization
The equalization and neutralization tank allows the wastewater
to be treated on a batch basis. Neutralization of the influent
is needed because the optimum pH for biological treatment is
5050H185
- - - - - - -- -- - -- -
BACl(WAStt/SBR SLUDGE
TO DIGESTER
OUTER TIER EFFLUENT
TO #1 Ptl..JSlilNG PCM)
INNER TIER EFFLUENT
TD #1 POLISHING POND
INNER TIER II-FLUENT
J~J'\....---------------------------~--------------1 <1 -:,,..-. -I ,-------------·~----, ~
I/ ~~
SEWEHCING BATCH REACTOR
Q)C FROM TOP OF SBR l
- -' I
I
I/ I
I
l.l'IL --..1 '\.... _________ --<C _______________ I
,---,a---"."L,-".'-----'1',
I
SOOIUW
HYDROXIDE
AIR
STR IPP'ER
OOTER TIER INFLUENT
"" STRIPPER
EQUALIZATION /
NEUTRAL Ill TI ON UNK
EQUAL I ZA Tl ON
TANK
DECANT
ca..LECTICJ.4
TAN<
----
LEGEND
SAMPLING LOCATIONS NOT TO SCALE
WESTINGHOUSE PROJECT 412485050H
DESIGNED BY
DRAWN BY
CHECKED BY
FILE NAME 5050N06
DATE
Westinghouse Environmental
and Geotechnical Services, Inc.
FIGURE 1-3
GROUNDWATER TREATMENT SYSTEM
SCHEMATIC FLOW DIAGRAM
HC/SHELBY
-WESTINGHOUSE PROJECT 4124-85-OSOH
-
I
I .,.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I NO.
I
-•-.. 1;r Pl-•01 -r .. ~~ _,
,. """'
J-t-1999
-•
8
1:l=.!9ll__ ~..,,.,.....,_,_
1-1/1". r--,-
I ,:.1.I:.t:.lml!l. -· I
i
~ .. .., --
L-----------.11.'LL-+i
I
I
' ' ' ' ' ' ' : ...
I .....
~ I I I I
' 1---
1 I I I
I I I
I
I ' ' ' ' I L _____ _ ________ .J
,,...._
INNER TIER JEIL SXSTEM
~---------------' .
I ----
> ' -,
.... .!';!.,,-.,
('m Dn• T .wo..irJ
., ...
REVISIONS
f1"!CII.RIIIIU.CIU1al .. 'CU. ~ (Of•! Nl,I 0t--. ~ GI ..... OT•U • OT_..)
..
, .. 11/f"
"' ...... J-11::1002<!) ~ ~ f.L.'--+lf--1 .... · ,,.. ... f •
1----------+-..J Tx -1,rr ca-u
BY WESTINGHOUSE PROJECT
DESIGNED BY
DRAWN BY
CHECKED BY
FILE NO. 49135200
-~.J
!
~·, ______ ,~··
,i;:'',~.~~1~~~ ! r..----..---------,-c;.-'-"-:' ,. "(ltaa.[ ... 'Ip, I ~~~~
'7 ~ ' ' ~ CO-Tltu. ~--B
~---, -
L·--, ...
Y-P-1003
"'&4 110'111 : I ------------o/ -------------,
~
Y-V-1014
r----------------------,
7 '""
' , ', V
' , ' , '
.,, .... '
Westinahouse Environmental
and Geotechnical Services, Inc.
REFERENCE HOECHST
~~ Z"b i ,-.:..;;;... ..... ,.>--....;"'---!---,
r-
sl ,,
1-:--~Z)~",,..."""w.~ ~«=A~~.~: .. ~••
-10 -~ ,,., •v --Fl.at...._•"" c:«• ~ 1C1Y ID.,·• --z_ l,,£\IQ.a.,-, .. ,1_ .. ____ 0l'lltllA_.,Ur./Stll:,m-,,._
•--IOOI. ~ •••••"""IS-• -Of'PAllD
•on "'IO'f'&C. ... ••lf'oM:; -.i _,. -c.sccNofCt s•rt>o ....... 11-1.1>1,;.., l(IMUll..,
)(l;IO.M "',Cllt00.1( (-11) ,OS.--~ ~![II ~""-1. l'l , ... U.~,·-
""--~-•-1,ni,,:; 1,0.1-.L llOC" U-C:ClDI ,s ....,.,a, ..:,U 1,,o .. , ... ,_
._ lf\O. co,,-a,_~ U 1-.,_.,_,ooz M«> U..O•l60UI .. , 1--• COlll111Q. Ol"fll.,I,-C, ..,__ .,_.,_, __ U1•ll002 t,_J S1M1'1 ._.,,.
Uf•JIOO:I (lOWI ._, -.-..lllOIO ..,-r 0Tr ...__, .. OCJI ,_,..,,
ilil/JOMAac.-J.1' srot,111'11 MCI ~ •-,.,_ 1'-f'•U»•
7. l,C,Cl CllllaQ.S ,U ,_ ... ..__, -~JIOl1 &f , __ ,. •...•
COffllO.. ~--"' ~ o-r-1 --.. or-a -,._.,._~.,... ·· · IJ"f•JIIOCU (Ml) 9&.111 ar, ~ 01-1 --.. c,t ... u,-:.ou a.-, .... ; :s,r.:-,,::,cr,_~:~ ~,ck~~ WI, --~ ....... IOOl'-.:.r..: "-!:...._,t!l -.. -.......... _. Wil..lMQ. "'::,..._" -iv.c -.,u ~ :.
• ~ CCllf1IICU -<"-•-,oot) -~ 1' ..... 100, -T-f'•KIU (Kl Ol,G. "f~IM-fl)
•· -...c:aA1U1 -rs ""' DO'ICII .. ~ ~~~!!t..~".:.,P.'·' '-'•t-t)
en-"" •t 1'-►tODO a:r.-...i.o-... At ,,_.._._ c:u,__,e I.CW\ 4t _,,_tCIDO _.,..___,.,,_ U.'CL. At .. W.1000 cu. __ • .,.
Ct'---.Jt '-""l. 4t Y-►"""3 C!,7_,,. 1.tCL ., Y.►100, CIL..-.N/111 LL'CL. AT l•W-HIDJ ._ g~!" ~ :: ~oo"r ,.,_ (or-, ~-a;
~, ... ll'CL AT ., .... ,oa,
U"L-....ltl/111 I.Elllll. ., ------(JC..._...-l.tWl, -'"'IEA --c.Jl--l.09' Ll.--n. &I ••-IOOI ~Ll.'IIQ.U.,._►ICln ~/N l.tWI. ., ,,_ ......
CJ,t-C-)I.JIG ,U,,. &T CUD _,. ~ (Df-1,A.Dl•f&,O ...... i
10. AU CCUl'l«IIIT &UCICl&Q •-GU1Dt ,.. .i...5 Dl•U, 01•7A,, • OT•a& IS ,VMII(..
11. "1: IP(C ... WI. fla."""D ,. IIQ,W'Jlal"I\DI[.
IL "1: 9'le .... tr0•,a,,,.,,_,_JIOl.""'-'11.DC.
•J. ~ .,_•-1ou ,s • l'OCIIO aoc ~ tr r'-«e-.... con.a.a IIOl-,Ql••...,n-~
16. ~ "'-'IDS 111.U. ~--..... Gil. •Y<IIC.JI. !;IC "-ID Mt IC CIIUIC,t,tlt N --0 ID,..._
L&!illlll Cl:>6.~----~----
~
___ .. }
DrWX , .. -""914.taL.io..ru. --~--~-l 'Cl'"' -..,'-'~-IU. --:t co,-.o,......,c
~ "'tll. CLO Wl.,C ■-_.II -
Cl&'IWiL"Cf-lCUII ·1~,-~ ... ,. I---••?
.............
N --· ! --· -_,..,
m l.otM. r.t/Cff .. ~ --... eoc,,. .... uo,:
~ ~ 0-/Cff ---uo,,
• _,_., ... .. ....,. --""""GIi ~ -,:s ·•· ~,c.-,-...a: -0 ---
IIOT( ,15 .,_, .
~ ~-.-
CELANESE DRAWING ~-e·
Y-10-11501 i'IEV.4 10/26/89
,~ ..,_.. t-••1010 ,S & -.[ CJlSi(IIII 'Y •-f'•ID'll. ..,._ ca.-.;-:."l'or;llo .S &I ~ LOG. H cic:aa-,
•• ~ fa'PCIS ■nl ·~ ~DC•l'Ot tf.flCtll &[W;Altllt5 -cs; SaN.
FIGURE 1-4
PROCESS AND INSTRUMENTATION
OPERABLE UNIT 1 F AGILITIES
DIAGRAM
HC/SHELBY
WESTINGHOUSE PROJECT 4124-85-OSOH
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Operable Unit 1 Quarterly Status Report
November 1989 to February 1990
Hoechst Celanese/Shelby, NC
Westinghouse Project 4124-85-050H
Document Control 85050H-0219
Page 1-12
between pH 6.5 and 7.5., and is accomplished by the raising the
pH of the influent using sodium hydroxide (caustic). A pH
control system measures the pH of the solution and adjusts the
addition of caustic on a demand basis to maintain the effluent
within acceptable pH limits.
Solids/Metals Precipitation
Iron removal is needed prior to biological treatment. After the
pH of the influent is raised to about 7.5, a small amount of a
chemical polymer is added to coagulate the metal particles into
larger, heaver floe particles, which then separate from the
water. A parallel-plate separator is used to remove the
coagulated floe particles, and the clear liquid overflows a weir
and enters the biological treatment unit. The precipitated iron
sludge is collected in drums for disposal at an off-site
facility.
Sequencing Batch Reactor
The sequencing batch reactor (SBR) treatment is a biological
wastewater treatment tank which operates in a sequence of
cycles. The SBR cycle consists of fill, treatment, settle,
decant, and idle stages. At the beginning of the cycle,
nutrients are added as needed. Aeration continues throughout
5050H185
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Operable Unit 1 Quarterly Status Report
November 1989 to February 1990
Hoechst Celanese/Shelby, NC
Westinghouse Project 4124-85-050H
Document Control 85050H-0219
Page 1-13
the fill cycles and until the subsequent settling cycle. One
complete cycle occurs each day.
Based on the influent data, ammonia and phosphorous addition may
be needed in the SBR. Typically, the ratio in a wastewater
treatment is 100 to 5 to 1 for BOD, ammonia-nitrogen, and
phosphorous, respectively. Nutrients are added manually to
approximately maintain these ratios.
Air stripper system
The air stripping system receives water from the decant
collection tank using a transfer pump. The air stripping system
consists of the air stripping tower, sump, and the effluent
pump. The equipment is operated in an automatic mode, and is
designed to start automatically on a high liquid level in the
decant collection tank. When the air stripping tower sump fills
to a preset level, the effluent pump activates and pumps the
water through the activated carbon filter.
Carbon Filtration
The treated water is pumped through the carbon filter(s) by the
air stripper sump pump. The carbon filter(s) are valved such
that any one or all of the filters may be used. Currently, only
5050H185
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Operable Unit 1 Quarterly status Report
November 1989 to February 1990
Hoechst Celanese/Shelby, NC
Westinghouse Project 4124-85-050H
Document Control 85050H-0219
Page 1-14
one of the carbon filters is used for the inner tier. After
flowing through the carbon filters, the effluent is discharged
into the first polishing pond prior to being discharged through
the plant's NPDES outfall.
1.3.2 outer Tier Treatment system
Equalization
The equalization tank is used to collect the pumped groundwater
prior to treatment to provide more uniform influent for plant
operation and process control.
Air Stripper system
The air stripper receives water from the equalization tank using
a transfer pump. The air stripping system consists of the air
stripping tower, sump, and the effluent pump. The equipment
operates in an automatic mode to pump liquid from the
equalization tank to the top of the air stripping tower. When
the air stripping tower sump is filled to a preset level, the
air stripping effluent pump activates and pumps the water to the
activated carbon filter.
5050H185
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Carbon Filtration
Operable Unit 1 Quarterly Status Report
November 1989 to February 1990
Hoechst Celanese/Shelby, NC
Westinghouse Project 4124-85-0S0H
Document Control BS0S0H-0219
Page 1-15
The air stripper water is pumped through the carbon filters by
the air stripper sump pump. The carbon filters are valved such
that any one or all of the filters may be used. Currently, two
of the carbon filters are used for the outer tier system. After
flowing through the carbon filters, the effluent is discharged
into the first polishing pond prior to being discharged through
the plant's NPDES outfall.
5050H185
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Operable Unit 1 Quarterly Status Report
November 1989 to February 1990
Hoechst Celanese/Shelby, NC
Westinghouse Project 4124-85-050H
Document Control 85050H-0219
Page 2-1
2.0 INNER TIER TREATMENT SYSTEM
2.1 Influent Water Quality
The average, minimum, maximum, and standard deviation of the
influent water quality parameter concentrations are shown in
Appendix I. Total organic carbon (TOC) ranged from a minimum of
360 mg/1 to a maximum of 2900 mg/1 and averaged 1201 mg/1.
Influent water was analyzed for total organic halogens (TOX) in
November and January, and concentrations were 0.11 mg/1 and 0.08
mg/1, respectively. The pH of the influent averaged 5.67 prior
to neutralization.
2.2 Inner Tier Treatment Processes
The average influent pH during the quarter was 5.67 and was
adjusted to a target of 7.5 prior to solids precipitation using
caustic addition. Solids/metals precipitation occurs after the
pH of the influent is properly adjusted. The system has
operated as designed during this period and is expected to
continue operating adequately in the foreseeable future.
Based on the influent data, ammonia and phosphorous addition was
5050H186
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Operable Unit 1 Quarterly Status Report
November 1989 to February 1990
Hoechst Celanese/Shelby, NC
Westinghouse Project 4124-85-050H
Document Control 85050H-0219
Page 2-2
required in the SBR. Ammonia concentrations ranged from a
minimum of 1.40 mg/1 to a maximum of 40.43 mg/1 and averaged
11.60 mg/1. Phosphorous concentrations ranged from a minimum of
0.20 mg/1 to a maximum of 1.48 mg/1 and averaged 0.55 mg/1.
Typically, the ratio of 100 to 5 to 1 for BOD, ammonia-nitrogen,
and phosphorous, respectively is needed for good biological
treatment.
Based on effluent data, the SBR is not performing as well as it
did during the first quarter. The data show that approximately
54.1% TOC and 66.4% COD were removed in the treatment system.
Insufficient data were available to calculate TOX and BOD
removal efficiencies. Appendix I includes the average, minimum,
and maximum influent and effluent concentrations and percent
removals.
The SBR unit began experiencing problems during the third week
in October, 1989 (October 23, 1989). At that time, the SBR
died, and the ability to maintain an active biomass in the
system became subsequently more difficult. At present, the
actual cause of problems with the unit are unknown; however,
data obtained from the influent water indicates that shock
organic loadings are possibly a factor. The SBR unit has died
three times; once at the end of October, once at the end of
December, and again in early February. Table 2-1 presents SBR
5050H186
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
5050H1B6
a
!!
Operable Unit 1 Quarterly Status Report
November 1989 to February 1990
Hoechst Celanese/Shelby, NC
Westinghouse Project 4124-85-050H
Document Control 85050H-0219
Page 2-3
!~! ~~_!!_!l~!§§ ~~~~~~5~!~~~§ ~§§~~§§
-•N•N•,.,•.., .... ---
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Operable Unit 1 Quarterly Status Report
November 1989 to February 1990
Hoechst Celanese/Shelby, NC
Westinghouse Project 4124-85-0SOH
Document Control 85050H-0219
Page 2-4
influent and effluent COD values since October 1, 1989. This
table illustrates that the SBR biomass kills appear to correlate
with sharp rises of influent COD above equilibrium conditions.
Examination of the effluent COD values shows that the biomass
recovers slowly it at all, and reseeding is needed to initiate
further treatment.
Figure 2-1 and 2-2 graph the influent and effluent SBR COD
versus time. In October and December when SBR biomass kills
occurred, the SBR effluent COD values began increasing quickly
approximately 2 days after a influent COD shock loading. A
similar trend did not occur in February when the effluent COD
increased more slowly.
Westinghouse has recommended a sampling and testing program to
help define problems relating to the SBR unit. Document number
85050H-0216, dated February 15, 1990, was sent to the EPA
discussing operation and testing of the SBR. A work plan
discussing the planned sampling and testing program will be sent
to the EPA by March 5, 1990.
In the last three months of operation, the air stripping system
has worked well operationally, but it appears to remove little
contamination using TOC as a measure of contamination
reduction. The average influent and effluent TOC concentrations
5050H186
-------------------
~
'---en E ~ ...,
C
(l) ::,
'<-C
20000
18000
16000
14000
12000
10000
8000
6000
4000
2000
0
8/1
WESTINGHOUSE PROJECT 4124-88-0SOH DATE
DESIGNED BY
DRAWN BY
CHECKED BY
FILE NAME 49135200
Inner Tier Influent vs. SBR Effluent
Daily COD
10/1
-Influent -8-SBR
12/1
Effluent
~ Westinghouse Environmental ~ and Geo technical Services, Inc.
20000
18000
16000
14000
~
'---
12000 en
E
~ ...,
10000 C
(l)
::,
;;:: '<-w
8000 Ct'. m
V)
6000
4000
2000
0
1 /31
FIGURE 2-1
INNER TIER INFLUENT VS SBR EFFLUENT
DAILY COD
HC/SHELBY
WESTINGHOUSE PROJECT 4124-88-0SOH
-------------------
14,000
12,000
10,000
~
------CJ) 8,000 E
~
~
C
Q) ::, 6,000
~
C
4,000
2,000
WESTINGHOUSE PROJECT 4124-BB-050H DATE
DESIGNED BY
DRAWN BY
CHECKED BY
FILE NAME 49135200
Inner Tier Influent vs SBR Effluent
Rolling Weekly Average COD
Week Beginning
-Influent -8-SBR Effluent
~ Westinghouse Environmental ~ and Geo technical Services, Inc.
14,000
12,000
10,000
------
CJ)
8,000 E
~
~
C Q) ::,
~
6,000 ~ w
a::
(D
ti)
4,000
2,000
FIGURE 2-2
INNER TIER INFLUENT VS SBR EFFLUENT
ROLLING WEEKLY AVERAGE COD
HC/SHELBY
WESTINGHOUSE PROJECT 4124-88-0SOH
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Operable Unit 1 Quarterly Status Report
November 1989 to February 1990
Hoechst Celanese/Shelby, NC
Westinghouse Project 4124-85-0SOH
Document Control 85050H-0219
Page 2-7
were 713 mg/1 and 695 mg/1, respectively. This probably is
because very little of the influent COD consists of volatile
organic compounds.
In the last three months of operation, the carbon filter system
has worked well operationally, but it appears to remove little
contamination using TOC as a measure of contamination
reduction. The average influent and effluent TOC concentrations
were 639 mg/1 and 619 mg/1, respectively. Contacts are being
made with the equipment vendor to see how system performance can
be improved.
Four of the inner tier pump and controls were replaced with QED
system pumps during late January. Since that time, all the
pumps have worked satisfactorily.
2.3 Contract Laboratory Program (CLP) Data
2.3.1 Influent/Effluent Data
The inner tier combined influent entering the treatment system
(station #2) (see Figure 1-3 for sample locations) and the
effluent exiting the system after carbon adsorption (station #8)
were sampled and analyzed for chromium and volatile organic
compounds (VOCs) on November 3, 1989, December 8, 1989, and
5050H186
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Operable Unit 1 Quarterly Status Report
November 1989 to February 1990
Hoechst Celanese/Shelby, NC
Westinghouse Project 4124-85-050H
Document Control 85050H-0219
Page 2-8
January 10, 1990. Data from October 9, 1989 is also included
here, since it was unavailable during preparation of the first
quarterly report. Samples were analyzed for chromium on all
four occasions and volatile organic analyses (VOAs) were
performed on the sample collected November 3, 1989. The results
are summarized in Table 2-2. For a more complete listing of the
results and the data sheets see Appendix II. Explanations of
the laboratory qualifiers used (generally single letter
following the numerical results, e.g. "J" or 11 B11 ) are included
at the beginning of Appendix IX: QA/QC Data on Blanks, Matrix
Spikes, and Matrix Spike Duplicates.
In no case did the chromium content of samples exceed the MCL
for this metal (50 ppb). Chromium was detected in two of the
three influent samples at concentrations of 27.0 and 41.1 parts
per billion (ppb) and chromium content was below the
quantitation limit in the third influent sample and in all four
effluent samples. The primary voe observed in samples collected
November 3, 1989 was acetone. The influent sample contained 591
ppb acetone, and the effluent sample contained 680 ppb. Acetone
was also detected in the laboratory blank run with both samples
suggesting the possibility of laboratory contamination. The
influent sample contained carbon disulfide at 10 ppb and benzene
at 31 ppb. Neither of these compounds was present in the
effluent samples above the quantitation limit.
- -~ 0 ~ 0 = ~ - ------ ----- -TABLE 2-2: CCMPOJNOS/ANALYTES DETECTED IN INFLUENT/EFFLUENT SAMPLES: INNER & OJTER EXTRACTION TIERS SAMPLE DATE 10/9/89 11/3/89 12/8/89 1/10/90 1/8/90 TCL/TAL PARAMETERS TOTAL CONCENTRATION (ppb) STATION # ANALYZED FOR TCL* TIC** #2 imer tier influent Cr #8 inner tier effluent #1 outer tier influent #7 outer tier effluent #2 imer tier influent VOA, Cr #8 irvier tier effluent #1 outer tier influent #7 outer tier effluent #2 inner tier influent (Satll)le not rLll) #8 inner tier effluent Cr #1 outer tier influent #7 outer tier effluent #2 imer tier influent #8 irv-ier tier effluent #1 outer tier influent #7 outer tier effluent c, .,. 591 680 60 BOL .,. NIA .,. 1740 1410 17 13 ., . . ,. TCL c~s detected: acetone; carbon disulfide; benzene. I OF CCMPOJNDS DETECTED TCL* TIC.. Cr CONCS. (ppb)0• N/A • 3 1 1 0 N/A N/A ., . • 9 6 2 2 ., . . , . • (29.0) (BQL) (BOL) (BQL) (41. 1) (BQL) (BCL) (BCL) (BCL) (BQL) (BQL) (BQL) (BQL) (BQL} BOL TIC cOl!l)Olms detected: 2·methyl-propanol; butanal; 2-propyl furan; ethenyl ester formic acid; 1-chloro·2·methyt propane; ethyl ester butanoic acid; acetic acid butyl ester; 1-hexanol; butanol; 2-methyl propanoic acid; pentanoic acid; 2 unknown hydrocarbons; 1 unknown alcohol; 5 lrlknowns. values in parentheses are below the HCL ---0 'tl (1) '1 Pl tr ~ .... (1) (1) tll rt z C: ,_.. 0 ::l O::l <,_.· ou:i::i:rort o::roa COl1ltrf-' a i:: o ro (1) tll ::r '1 ,0 ::l (1) tll i:: rt rt f-' Pl 'ti ID '1 ()>-j()OJrt 0 0 (1) ID (1) ::l u..... '1 rt 11> Pl rt f-' '10::lO'< 0 rt 11> .... tll "l C/l ... (1) (1) rt OJ f-' '-tr Pl U1 "' C/l '1 rt 'ti O ... ::r i:: i:: Pl U1 I 11> Pl tll '° 0 "' .... '1 11lZU1tr'<:,:l I I '< 11> I\J00"" ~"d II\JU1 IDO 1Df-'OZID'1 ID:I:OOrt -
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Operable Unit 1 Quarterly Status Report
November 1989 to February 1990
Hoechst Celanese/Shelby, NC
Westinghouse Project 4124-85-050H
Document control 85050H-0219
Page 2-10
No additional compounds from the Target Compound List (TCL) were
detected in the effluent sample. However, influent and effluent
samples contain Tentatively Identified Compounds (TICs) in con-
centrations of 1740 ppb and 1410 ppb, respectively.
In summary, CLP laboratory analyses generally demonstrate a
reduction in the concentration of TCL compounds following
treatment by the inner tier treatment system.
2.3.2 Sludge Dewatering -Metals Treatment
Sludge samples were collected from the SBR unit on November 10,
1989 and December 8, 1989. The analytical results for sludge
samples collected from the SBR and filter press on October 10,
1989 are also presented here, since they were unavailable during
preparation of the first quarterly report. Complete TCL/TAL
analyses were performed on the three SBR samples and one filter
press sludge sample. In addition, a full TCL/TAL analyses was
performed on a TCLP extract of the filter press sludge sample.
The results of sludge analyses are summarized in Table 2-3. For
a complete listing of the results and the original laboratory
data sheets, see Appendix III.
The predominant voe present in the SBR sludge samples is
acetone. Acetone content of the four SBR samples ranges from
5050H186
- -~ 0 ~ 0 X ~ - -- -- - -- - -- - -TABLE 2-3: CCJIPWNDS DETECTED IN SLLOGE SAMPLES TCL/TAL PARAMETERS TOTAL CONCENTRATION (ppb) I OF COMPClJNOS DETECTED SAMPLE DATE SLUOGE TYPE CLP ANAL YlEO FOR TCL* TIC .. TCL* TIC** 10/19/B9 SBR y VOA 60 BQL 1 0 BN/A 34 3400 2 20 Pest./PCB TAL Filter Press y VOA 608 750 2 8 BN/A 3000 230000 1 20 Pest./PCB JAL Filter Press y VOA 187 BQL ' 0 <TCLP Fraction) SN/A 47 238 2 8 Pest./PCB TAL 11/10/89 SBR ' VOA 3190 180 2 5 SN/A 2060 19100 2 20 Pest ,/PCB BQL 0 SBR ' TAL 12/8/89 SBR y VOA 6600 BQL 1 0 BN/A 38 4700 2 20 Pest./PCB TAL SBR y VOA 8 BQL 1 0 TCL compolXlds detected: VOA -methylene chloride, acetone, chloroform, 2·butanone. BN/A • phenol, 2-chlorophenol, 4•1'1@thylphenol, bis(2·ethylhexyl)phthalate; benzoic acid; di·n·b.Jtylphthalate. TIC compounds detected: see Appendix Ill for COl!l)lete listing. -- -0 'O (I) 11 -"' O' ::e: I-' (I) (I) rn IT Z C: ..... 0::, o::, <t-'· 0IQ:X:(l)IT o::roa S::0(1)0'1--' a i:: o (I) (I) rn ::,-11 c ::l(l)rJ> i:: IT ITl--'ll> 'd \0 11 0 11 O 00 IT 0QCD\0(1) ::, u. I-' 11 IT (I) Ill IT I-' 110::l0'< 0 IT (I) I-' rn '"<I C/l ,.. (I) (I) IT 001--' ....... 0'll> U1 "-' C/l 11 IT 'do,..::,-i::i:: -~ U1 I (I) Ill rn ,.. 0001-'11 (I) z U1 O''< :u I I '< CD "-' 0 o-1--''0 I "->Ul \00 1--' 1--' OZ \0 11 1--'\0:X:OOIT
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Operable Unit 1 Quarterly Status Report
November 1989 to February 1990
Hoechst Celanese/Shelby, NC
Westinghouse Project 4124-85-050H
Document Control 85050H-0219
Page 2-12
below instrument quantitation limit (BQL) to 6600 ppb. The high
and low concentrations were both observed in samples collected
on December 8, 1989. 2-Butanone was also detected at 90 ppb in
the sample collected on November 10, 1989. Chloroform was
detected at 8 ppb in one of the samples collected on December 8,
1989.
Benzoic acid was the semi-volatile acid compound most frequently
detected in SBR sludge samples. Two out of three samples
contained detectable concentrations ranging up to 1900 ppb.
Five additional compounds were detected in one sample each.
These included: phenol, 2-chlorophenol, 4-methylphenol, bis
(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate, and di-n-butylphthalate. The detected
concentrations of all but one were~ 20 ppb. The sample
collected on November 10, 1989 contained 160 ppb 2-chloro-
phenol. This sample also contained 1900 ppb benzoic acid.
The total concentration of TIC compounds in the samples ranged
from 3400 ppb to 19,280 ppb, and the number of TIC compounds
ranged from 20 to 25. The sample collected November 10, 1989
contained a much higher concentration of TICs than other
samples. It was also the only sample which contained VOA-TICs.
The predominant VOA compound detected in the filter press sludge
was acetone (530 ppb), although its presence is suspect since it
5050H186
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Operable Unit 1 Quarterly Status Report
November 1989 to February 1990
Hoechst Celanese/Shelby, NC
Westinghouse Project 4124-85-0SOH
Document Control 85050H-0219
Page 2-13
was also detected in the associated laboratory blank. The
sample also contained 78 ppb of 2-butanone. Bis(2-ethylhexyl)
phthalate (3000 ppb) was the only semi-volatile compound
detected in the sample. While this value cannot legitimately be
disqualified, it is somewhat suspect, since phthalate esters are
common laboratory contaminants (present on the gloves worn by
laboratory technicians, etc.). Analysis of future filter press
sludge samples should resolve this question.
The TCLP leachate derived from the filter press sludge sample
contained similar quantities and numbers of volatile organics as
the crude sludge including 160 ppb acetone, 21 ppb 2-butanone,
and 6 ppb methylene chloride. Phenol and benzoic acid at 7 ppb
and 40 ppb, respectively, were detected in the semi-volatile
analysis. The detected concentration of phenol is below the
established regulatory level for the final toxic characteristic
of the leachate (100 ppb). No levels have been established for
the other organics detected. The levels established for metals,
along with the detected concentrations of these metals in the
leachate are:
5050H186
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Metal
arsenic
barium
cadmium
chromium
lead
mercury
selenium
silver
Operable Unit 1 Quarterly Status Report
November 1989 to February 1990
Hoechst Celanese/Shelby, NC
Westinghouse Project 4124-85-050H
Document Control 85050H-0219
Page 2-14
Final Toxic Characteristic
Regulatory Level /mq/ll
Concentration Detected
in TCLP Leachate /mg/ll
5.0 BDL
100.0 3.0
1.0 BDL
5.0 0.09
5.0 BDL
0.2 BDL
1.0 BDL
5.0 0.04
BDL -below instrument quantitation
The detected concentrations are all below the regulatory
levels to classify the materials as hazardous based on the
characteristic of toxicity.
5050H186
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Operable Unit 1 Quarterly Status Report
November 1989 to February 1990
Hoechst Celanese/Shelby, NC
Westinghouse Project 4124-85-0SOH
Document Control 85050H-0219
Page 3-1
3.0 OUTER TIER TREATMENT SYSTEM
3.1 Influent Water Quality
The average, minimum, maximum, and standard deviation of the
influent parameter concentrations are shown in Appendix IV. TOC
ranged from a minimum of 3.9 mg/1 to a maximum of 47 mg/1 and
averaged 15.7 mg/1. Influent water was analyzed monthly for
TOX, and the concentrations were 0.96 mg/1, 0.04 mg/1 and 0.02
mg/1 for November, December, and January, respectively. The pH
of the influent averaged 6.15.
3.2 Outer Tier Treatment Processes
The outer tier groundwater is pumped into a 4,500 gallon tank
for equalization to store and mix the pumped groundwater prior
to treatment. The pumping and equalization system has worked
well during this quarter.
During the last three months, the air stripping system has
worked well operationally. However, some fouling has started
to occur in the packing, and replacement packing has been
5050H187
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Operable Unit 1 Quarterly Status Report
November 1989 to February 1990
Hoechst Celanese/Shelby, NC
Westinghouse Project 4124-85-050H
Document Control 85050H-0219
Page 3-2
purchased. The average influent and effluent TOC concentrations
were 15.7 mg/1 and 5.5 mg/1, respectively.
During the last three months, the carbon filter system has
worked well operationally. The average influent and effluent
TOC concentrations were 5.5 mg/1 and 4.0 mg/1, respectively.
3.3 Contract Laboratory Program (CLP) Influent/Effluent Data
The outer tier combined influent entering the treatment system
(station #1) and the effluent exiting the system after carbon
adsorption (station #7) were sampled and analyzed for chromium
on November 3, 1989, December 8, 1989, and January 8, 1990. The
sample collected on November 3, 1989 was also analyzed for
volatile organics compounds (VOCs). Chromium data from October
9, 1989 is also included here, since it was unavailable during
preparation of the first quarterly report. The results are
summarized in Table 2-2 (included in the section on the inner
tier treatment system). Appendix IV contains a more complete
summary of the results and the original data sheets. The
chromium content of all eight samples was below the instrument
quantitation limit.
5050H187
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Operable Unit 1 Quarterly Status Report
November 1989 to February 1990
Hoechst Celanese/Shelby, NC
Westinghouse Project 4124-85-0SOH
Document Control 85050H-0219
Page 3-3
The influent sample collected on November 3, 1989 contained 60
ppb acetone, although its presence is suspect since it was also
detected in the associated laboratory blank. The sample also
contained 17 ppb of "unknown" VOA-TICs. No TCL compounds were
detected in the effluent sample. However, the latter contained
13 ppb of unknown VOA-TICs.
In summary, the influent samples contained acetone at 60 ppb and
17 ppb VOA TICs. No TCL target compounds were present in the
effluent sample; however, 13 ppb of an unknown VOA-TICs was
measured. Chromium was not detected in either the influent or
effluent samples.
5050H187
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Operable Unit 1 Quarterly Status Report
November 1989 to February 1990
Hoechst Celanese/Shelby, NC
Westinghouse Project 4124-85-050H
Document Control 85050H-0219
Page 4-1
4.0 PUMPING SYSTEM OPERATION AND HYDROLOGIC
EFFECTS OF PUMPING
Flow meter readings were collected at each extraction well on a
daily basis. Water levels have been measured weekly at six
select monitor wells, five piezometers, and four extraction
wells. Monthly water levels were recorded for other wells and
piezometers. The boring logs and well schematics for all
extraction and monitor wells and all but six of the piezometers
are presented in the appendices of two earlier S&ME reports: a
Remedial Investigation Report prepared June, 1986 (S&ME document
control number 050A-0056) and report entitled "Pump Test for
Outer Tier Extraction System and Proposed Design Modifications"
prepared February, 1989 (S&ME document control number
85050H-0139). Schematics for the remaining six piezometers are
presented in Appendix VI of this report. Flow meter and water
level readings have been summarized in graphic and tabular form,
and precede the data sheets in Appendix VII. Also included in
Appendix VII are Plates 1 through 4 which show pre-extraction
groundwater elevations (July 25, 1989) and interpreted
groundwater elevations on December 6, 1989, January 4, 1990, and
February 5, 1990. The interpreted groundwater contours were
generated from groundwater data collected on the respective
dates. In areas where well nests (two or more wells) were
5050H188
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Operable Unit 1 Quarterly Status Report
November 1989 to February 1990
Hoechst Celanese/Shelby, NC
Westinghouse Project 4124-85-050H
Document Control 85050H-0219
Page 4-2
present, the well with the deepest water level was chosen to use
as contour data. This accounts for different wells being
present on the various plates.
4.1 Inner Tier system
4.1.1 Flow Data
During this quarter, the average flow in inner tier wells has
ranged from 164 gallons per day (gpd) in IT-1 to 599 gpd in
IT-6. The cumulative average daily flow for all nine wells was
2736 gpd. This cumulative yield is probably high due to air in
the lines. This results in inaccurate flow readings. The inner
tier pump system is controlled by a high level switch in the
equalization tank which interrupts pumping after the extraction
system replaces the 2300 gallon batch treated in the SBR. The
wells can be divided into five subgroups based on yield. Wells
IT-1 and IT-2 averaged less than 200 gpd. IT-3 and IT-8 each
averaged about 250 gpd. IT-4, IT-5, IT-7, and IT-9 averaged
between 300 and 370 gpd. IT-6 averaged approximately 600 gpd.
The lowest pumping rates occur toward the northeastern end of
the extraction system and the highest pumping rate occurs near
the center of the extraction system (IT-6). This trend reflects
the continued difficulties experienced in getting some of the
pumps at the northeastern end of the extraction system to
5050H188
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Operable Unit 1 Quarterly status Report
November 1989 to February 1990
Hoechst Celanese/Shelby, NC
Westinghouse Project 4124-85-050H
Document Control 85050H-0219
Page 4-3
function properly. Inner tier extraction wells IT-4, IT-5, and
IT-6 functioned most consistently. Spurious readings
occasionally recorded for wells OT-7, OT-8, and OT-9 appear to
have raised the average pumping rates reported for these three
wells.
4.1.2 Groundwater Elevations
Water levels in the inner tier area are represented by monitor
wells:
J-28
J-59
K-28
N-29
N-53
0-25
0-59
V-23
Y-38
Y-74
CC-33
CC-64
Water levels in these wells were measured November 9, 1989,
December 6, 1989, January 4, 1990, and February 2, 1990. In
general, the water levels in all wells rose slowly throughout
this period. Most wells experienced a slight drop in water
level (generally less than 0.5 ft) between November 9, 1989 and
December 6, 1989, followed by a progressive rise throughout the
rest of the quarter. These trends are attributable to
variations in rainfall. Rainfall was negligible for the period
of November 9, 1989 through December 7, 1989 and January 31,
1990. The net rises in water level which occurred between
November 9, 1989 and February 5, 1990 ranged from a maximum of
4.28 ft in well N-53 to a minimum of 0.64 ft in well CC-33.
5050H188
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Operable Unit 1 Quarterly Status Report
November 1989 to February 1990
Hoechst Celanese/Shelby, NC
Westinghouse Project 4124-85-0SOH
Document Control 85050H-0219
Page 4-4
Water levels rises were greater in wells located at the
northeastern end of the extraction system and wells directly
adjacent to the extraction system. Water level rises in the 'N'
and 'Y' well nests, located at the northeastern end of the
extraction tier averaged 4.2 ft and 3.6 ft respectively. Water
level rises in the 'V' and 'K' wells, located directly adjacent
to the inner tier pumping wells, ranged from 3.1 ft to 3.9 ft.
In contrast, both 'CC' wells, located at the southwestern end of
the extraction system experienced water level rises of less than
1 ft. Remaining wells experienced intermediate changes in water
level.
4.2 Outer Tier System
4.2.1 Flow Data
Evaluation of the outer tier flow data for this quarter shown in
Appendix VII shows that the wells fall into distinct groups
based on average yields. Wells OT-1 and OT-2 yielded between
11,000 and 24,000 gpd with the average flow in the two wells of
approximately 18,000 gpd. Wells OT-5 and OT-8 yielded between
6,000 and 9,000 gpd and the average flow in the wells was
approximately 7,800 gpd. Outer tier wells OT-3, OT-4, and OT-7
yielded less than 4000 gpd. outer tier well OT-6 yielded
5050H188
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Operable Unit 1 Quarterly Status Report
November 1989 to February 1990
Hoechst Celanese/Shelby, NC
Westinghouse Project 4124-85-050H
Document Control 85050H-0219
Page 4-5
approximately 11,000 gpd for the 3-month period.
The major change that occurred from the start-up quarter is that
pumping in OT-1 and OT-2 was increased by approximately 60
percent. It was recommended by Westinghouse to increase pumping
capacity in OT-1 and OT-2 to increase the collection of
groundwater in the southeast area of the plant. This is the
area where contamination appears to have the greatest potential
to migrate off-site. Outer tier wells OT-3 through OT-8 have
maintained a regular pumping rate throughout the entire 6-month
period from start-up.
Overall, the outer tier pumping and metering system has
functioned well during this quarter, with occasional spurious
flow readings being generated. Wells OT-3, OT-5, and OT-7
appear to be pumping at their maximum capacity. The pumping
rate in wells OT-4, OT-6, and OT-8 could be increased so as to
lower water levels another 10-1. The pumping rate in wells OT-1
and OT-2 could be increased so as to lower water levels another
40-45 feet. It may be necessary to replace the existing pumps
in these two wells with larger pumps to produce more groundwater
capture in this area.
SOSOH188
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Operable Unit 1 Quarterly Status Report
November 1989 to February 1990
Hoechst Celanese/Shelby, NC
Westinghouse Project 4124-85-0SOH
Document Control 85050H-0219
Page 4-6
4.2.2 Groundwater Elevation
Water levels in the outer tier are represented by the following
monitor wells and piezometers:
M-44 (*)
P-31
P-58 (rock)
Q-33
R-17
R-42
T-17
T-35
T-58 (rock)
Z-78
AA-41
AA-54
DD-58
EE-58
FF-23
FF-34
FF-62
GG-25
GG-39
GG-61
( *) (rock)
(rock)
(rock)
(rock)
PZ-1 (rock)
PZ-2
PZ-3
PZ-4 (*) (rock)
PZ-5A (rock)
PZ-5B (rock)
PZ-6A
PZ-6B
PZ-7A (rock)
PZ-7B (rock)
NOTE: The"(*)" designation indicates wells that are
relatively far from the extraction wells, and the
"(rock)" designation indicates the wells are screened
into the bedrock.
Water levels of these wells were measured on November 9, 1989,
December 6, 1989, January 4, 1990 and February 2, 1990. Weekly
water level measurements were taken at monitor wells M-44, R-42,
T-17, T-35, T-58, and EE-58 and piezometers PZ-1, PZ-2, PZ-3,
PZ-4 and PZ-SA. In general, the change in water level elevation
has been small for the period November 9, 1989 through February
2, 1990. The maximum drawdown observed in an outer tier monitor
well or piezometer was -1.91 ft. at T-58. Increases in water
level of up to 1.83 ft. (PZ-4), were recorded in many
I wells/piezometers. The two extreme values are largely
attributable to the locations of the wells/piezometers in which
I they were observed. T-58 is located adjacent to OT-1, and both
5050H188
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Operable Unit 1 Quarterly Status Report
November 1989 to February 1990
Hoechst Celanese/Shelby, NC
Westinghouse Project 4124-85-0SOH
Document Control 85050H-0219
Page 4-7
are screened in rock. Piezometer PZ-4 is also screened in rock,
but it is located almost 800 ft. from the nearest extraction
well, OT-5. Slightly less than half of the wells and
piezometers monitored showed decreases in water level. The
average drawdown was 0.5 ft. All wells located south and west
of extraction wells OT-1, OT-2, and OT-3 showed a net drawdown
for the period November 19, 1989 through February 2, 1990.
Wells and piezometers located north and east of OT-3 more often
showed a net rise in water level over the same period. Drawdown
in this region was limited to wells and piezometers installed
inside (i.e. northwest) of the semi-circle of outer tier
extraction wells.
Based on the available data, it is difficult to conclude whether
rock wells have been more affected by pumping than the shallow
wells screened in soil and weathered rock. Of the six well
nests for which data was available, only the 'T' and 'P' well
nests showed a net drawdown. In the 'T' well nest, located at
the southwest end of the outer extraction tier, drawdown in the
rock well was 1.7 ft greater than drawdown in the shallow well.
Both 'P' wells located at the northeast end of the extraction
tier showed similar amounts of drawdown.
Examination of the water levels in pumping wells shows that they
have continued to operate at varying degrees of effectiveness in
5050H188
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Operable Unit 1 Quarterly Status Report
November 1989 to February 1990
Hoechst Celanese/Shelby, NC
Westinghouse Project 4124-85-050H
Document Control 85050H-0219
Page 4-8
obtaining the maximum possible drawdown in the well. As of
February 2, 1989, wells OT-3, OT-5, and OT-7 have generally
drawn the water down to near the top of the pump. Wells OT-4,
OT-6, and OT-8 typically have about 10 to 15 feet of water above
the pump. Wells OT-1 and OT-2 have about 40 to 45 feet of water
above the pump. The pumping rate in the latter five wells
could, therefore, be increased so as to draw the water level
down close to the top of the pump. Replacement of the pumps in
wells OT-1 and OT-2 would be needed to increase the drawdown at
these locations.
In the first quarterly report the recommendation was made to
install one additional extraction wells, one midway between OT-6
and OT-7 and the second midway between OT-7 and OT-8, to
increase the effectiveness of the extraction system in these
areas. During the second quarter piezometers PZ-6A and PZ-6B,
positioned midway between OT-6 and OT-7, showed a slight drop in
water level (~ 0.76 ft.). However, water levels in this region
are still 30 to 40 feet higher than water levels in the vicinity
of pumping wells OT-6 and OT-7, suggesting that an additional
pumping well is needed to improve the effectiveness of the
pumping in this area. A similar difference in water level
exists between pumping wells OT-7 and OT-8 and piezometers PZ-7A
and PZ-7B installed between them. Piezometers PZ-7A and PZ-7B
recorded a slight rise in water level during the period November
5050H188
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Operable Unit 1 Quarterly Status Report
November 1989 to February 1990
Hoechst Celanese/Shelby, NC
Westinghouse Project 4124-85-050H
Document Control 85050H-0219
Page 4-9
9, 1989 to February 2, 1990. Both observations confirm the need
for another extraction well between wells OT-7 and OT-8 to
improve the efficiency of the system in removing water from this
intermediate area.
The first quarterly report recommended the installation of six
piezometers along the outside edges of the outer extraction
tier, adjacent to OT-5, OT-6, and OT-7. These would provide the
additional water level information needed to measure the effects
of the pumping wells in this area.
The data developed during this quarter supplement the first
quarters information. We recommend:
0
0
0
the placement of higher capacity pumps in wells OT-1
and OT-2
the installation of additional extraction wells between
wells OT-6 and OT-7 and between wells OT-7 and OT-8
the use of the pumps from wells OT-1 and OT-2 in the
new extraction wells
o the installation of the proposed six piezometers
These activities will be scheduled after approval for the
actions are received from EPA.
5050H188
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Operable Unit 1 Quarterly Status Report
November 1989 to February 1990
Hoechst Celanese/Shelby, NC
Westinghouse Project 4124-85-050H
Document Control 85050H-0219
Page 5-1
5.0 GROUNDWATER QUALITY
Groundwater quality was monitored with 11 monitor wells and 5
residential wells to represent the conditions during the second
quarter of operation of the treatment system. Monitor well
samples were analyzed for chromium and/or volatile organics.
Residential wells were analyzed for TCL and TAL parameters. All
analyses were performed in accordance with CLP procedures. Ten
of the monitor wells represent on-site groundwater quality
(three inner tier (Table 5-1) and seven outer tier (Table 5-2)).
One monitor well and the five residential wells represent
off-site groundwater quality (Table 5-3). The laboratory data
and summary tables of the data are presented in Appendix VIII.
s.1 on-site Groundwater Quality
s.1.1 Background Groundwater Area
Background water quality is represented by monitor well C-49.
The only organic compound detected by the August 1989 sampling
was an unknown TIC which was also present in the associated
laboratory blank. Detected metals concentrations were all below
5050H189
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Operable Unit 1 Quarterly Status Report
November 1989 to February 1990
Hoechst Celanese/Shelby, NC
Westinghouse Project 4124-85-050H
Document Control 85050H-0219
Page 5-2
the Maximum Contaminant Levels (MCLs) established by the Safe
Drinking Water Act. The November 2, 1989 sampling of C-49 was
for analysis of chromium. The concentration of chromium in the
sample was determined to be below the sample quantitation limit.
5,1,2 Inner Tier Area
Groundwater quality in the vicinity of the inner tier is
represented by wells K-28, V-23, and CC-33. Samples were
collected on November 9, 1989, December 6 and 7, 1989, January
4, 1990, and January 8, 1990. Analyses for K-28 and V-23
collected on November 10, 1989, were disqualified because the
surrogate recoveries were out of limits. The wells were thus
resampled on January 8, 1990 and reanalyzed. The results of all
analyses are summarized in Table 5-1.
Of the three samples collected October 10, 1989, two contained
detectable levels of chromium with a reported concentration of
28.6 ppb in K-28 and 229 ppb in V-23. The latter was also the
only sample collected from an inner tier well which contained
chromium in excess of the MCL. Of the three samples collected
November 9 and 10, 1989, CC-33 detected chromium at 4.3 ppb.
Chromium was not detected in samples from K-28 or V-23.
Volatile organic analyses of samples from wells K-28 and V-23
5050H189
- -~ 0 ~ 0 :; ~ - - - - ---- - -TABLE 5-1: CCMPO.JNDS/ANALYTES DETECTED IN INNER TIER MONITOR IIELLS TCL/TAL PARAMETERS TOTAL CONCENTRATION (ppb) SAMPLE 0,1,TE l.'ELL # ANALYZED FOR TCL* TIC .. 10/9/89 CC-33 K-28 V-23 c, N/A N/A "' 5 # Of CCMPOUNDS DETECTED TCL* ill ... 4 --er ~cs. (ppb) ... (BQLJ (28.6) 229 (4.3) 11/9/89 11/10/89 CC-33 K-28 v-23 VOA,Cr VOA,Cr (disqualified, outside of contract required QA/QC Limits) (BQL) 12/6/89 12/7/89 1/4/90 1/8/90 CC-33 K-28 V-23 CC-33 K-28 k'.·28 V-23 c, c, c, VOA YOA1Cr " N/A N/A N/A 191 881 . " • (BQL) N/A (BOL) N/A (4.8) (BQL) N/A (BQL) (22.4) 3380 4 10 (BQL) 14600 5 10 i!lli TCL coq>Ot.Jnds detected: acetCM1e, carbon disulfide; 1,2-dichloroethene; 2-butanone; benzene; chlorobenzene. TIC c0fll)04.llds detected: trimethyl silenol; butanal; 2-propyl-furan; ethyl ester butanofc acid; butyl ester ecetic acid; acetaldehyde (DOT); methyl ester acetic acid; butyl acetic acid; 2 uiknown alkanes; 1 uiknown ester; 7 unknowns. values in parentheses are below the MCL --- -0 'O (1) '1 Ill tr ~ ..... (1) (1) Ul r1" z C: I-'· 0::, C,::, < I-'· 0 l£l :,: (1) r1" o::ros i::orotr>-' Si:: 0 C1l CllUl:,"'10 :C,(1)(/) i:: r1" r1" >-' Ill 'U \0 '1 ()>"j()O>r1" 0 0 C1l \0 C1l ::, w. ..... '1 r1" C1l Ill r1" >-' '1 0 ::, 0 '"< 0 r1" (1) >-' Ul "l C/l "' (1) (1) r1" o, >-' ...____ tr Ill U1 "' (/l '1 r1" 'U0.1>::ri::i:: ll>UllCllll>Ul l£l O 0) ..... '1 (1) z U1 tr'< :.:, I I '"< C1l UlOO• >-''O INU, \00 W>-'OZ\0'1 10:i:non--
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Operable Unit 1 Quarterly Status Report
November 1989 to February 1990
Hoechst Celanese/Shelby, NC
Westinghouse Project 4124-85-050H
Document Control 85050H-0219
Page 5-4
were disqualified due to problems with laboratory control. The
sample from CC-33 contained detectable quantities of acetone (28
ppb), 2-butanone (BJ ppb), benzene (80 ppb), and chlorobenzene
(27 ppb). Acetone was also detected in the associated
laboratory blank, making its presence in the sample suspect.
The concentration of 2-butanone detected was below the
instrument quantitation limit. The detected concentration of
benzene exceeds the MCL for this compound (5 ppb), while the
concentration of chlorobenzene is below its established MCL
(1000 ppb). The only VOA TIC detected in this sample was 5 ppb
of trimethyl silanol.
Chromium was not detected in any of the samples collected
December 6 and 7, 1989. Of the samples collected January 4,
1990 only K-28 (22.4 ppb) contained detectable chromium.
Chromium was not detected in V-23, the only sample collected on
January 8, 1990 which was analyzed for chromium.
Both samples collected January 8, 1990 were analyzed for
volatile organics. The analyses were performed to compensate
for the disqualified analyses of samples collected from these
same two wells on November 10, 1989. The number and kind of
detected compounds in each is similar to the number detected in
sample CC-33 collected November 9, 1989. Both samples contained
acetone, 2-butanone, and benzene. The detected quantities of
5050H189
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Operable Unit 1 Quarterly Status Report
November 1989 to February 1990
Hoechst Celanese/Shelby, NC
Westinghouse Project 4124-85-050H
Document control 85050H-0219
Page 5-5
benzene (19J ppb for V-23 and 15 ppb for K-28) still exceed the
MCL, but they are considerably lower than the value of 80 ppb
reported for the sample for CC-33. Additional detected
compounds included 3J ppb chlorobenzene (K-28), 82 ppb carbon
disulfide (V-23), and 110 ppb 1,2-dichloroethene (V-23). Both
samples show much higher concentration of TICs. The sample from
K-28 contained 3380 ppb TICs while the sample from V-23
contained 14,600 ppb TICs. Both samples contained large
quantities (~ 400 ppb) of butanol, 2-propyl furan, acetaldehyde
(DOT), and a number of unknowns.
5.1.3 outer Tier Area
Groundwater quality in the vicinity of the outer tier is
represented by wells P-58, T-35, AA-54, EE-58, FF-34, FF-62, and
GG-61. Samples were collected on November 2, 1989, December 5
and 6, 1989, January 4, 1990, and January 8, 1990. Data from
the October 9, 1989 sampling event is included here since it was
unavailable during the preparation of the first quarterly
report. Samples were analyzed for chromium on all five
occasions. Volatile organic analyses were performed on samples
collected November 2 through 9, 1989. The results of all
analyses are summarized in Table 5-2.
Of the 16 samples collected from outer tier monitor wells during
5050H189
--~ 0 ~ 0 ':; !ll - - - -- - - - - - - -TABLE 5-2: COMPOONDS/ANALYTES DETECTED IN OJTER TIER MONITOR WELLS TCL/TAL PARAMETERS TOTAL CONCENTRATION (ppb) # OF COMPClJNOS DETECTED SAMPLE DATE IJELL # ANALYZED FOR TCL • TIC .. TCL* TIC .. ~r CONCS. lE!E!!:!J"' .. 10/9/89 EE·58 c, N/A N/A (BQL) FF-34 • (BQL) T-35 (BQL) 11/2/89 FF-34 VOA,Cr BQL 8 0 1 (BQL) FF-62 " BQL BOL 0 0 (BQL) 11 /7 /89 GG-61 VOA,Cr BQL BOL 0 0 (BQL) T-35 25 60 4 2 (BQL) 11/8/89 EE-58 VOA, Cr 21 BQL 1 0 (BQL) 11/9/89 AA·54 VOA,Cr 32 BQL 2 0 (BQL) P-58 " 56 50 2 1 (BQL) 12/5/89 EE-58 c, N/A N/A (SQL) FF-34 . (BQL} 12/6/89 T-35 c, N/A N/A (BQL) 1/4/90 EE-58 c, N/A N/A (BQL) T-35 (BQL) us 90 FF-34 c, N A N A 107 TCL cCJlll)OI.Xlds detected: acetone; chloroform; 1,2-dichloroethane; 2-butanone; benzene. Tl C c~s detected: di chi orof luoro-methane; 1, 2-Dichloro-1, 1,2-t-ethane; trimethyl s i lanol. ~alues in pare-ntheses are below the MCL -- - -0 'O CD '1 Ill tr ~ ..... CD CD (/l rt-z C: I-'· 0::, c,::, <I-'· 0 o!l :X: CD rt-o ::r o S S::OCDtr..--S S:: C'l CD CD tll ::r '1 ,o ::, CD tll S:: rt-rt-..--P> "O \0 '1 n t1 n °' rt-O O CD \O CD ::, u...... '1 r1" CD Ill rt-.._, '10;:lO'< 0 rt-CD ..... (/l ":I C/l .i,. CD CD r1" 0> .._, ......_ tr Ill 01 "' C/l '1 rt-"O o..,. ::r i:: i:: Ill 01 I CD Ill tll 1Qo0>..--t1 CD Z 01 tr'< ::0 I I '< CD 0100• ..... 'O I tvU\ ~O ml-'OZ\0'1 \O:X:Oort--
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Operable Unit 1 Quarterly Status Report
November 1989 to February 1990
Hoechst Celanese/Shelby, NC
Westinghouse Project 4124-85-050H
Document Control 85050H-0219
Page 5-7
the time period October 9, 1989 through January 8,1990, only one
contained detectable quantities of chromium. The sample
collected from well FF-34 on January 8, 1990 contained 107 ppb
chromium. This value is uncharacteristic of the outer tier
area. The laboratory was questioned about the results of the
analysis; they reviewed their results; and they concluded the
results are valid.
The seven wells were sampled during the period November 2
through 9, 1989 and analyzed for volatile organics. The samples
can be broadly grouped into three categories based on well
location. Wells EE-58, FF-34, FF-62, and GG-61 lie in the
central portion of the outer tier. Well T-35 lies at the
southwest end of the outer tier. Wells AA-54 and P-58 lie at
the northeast end of the outer tier.
No TCL or TIC compounds were detected in samples from wells
FF-62 and GG-61. The sample from FF-34 contained no TCLs and 8
ppb of an unknown TIC. The sample from EE-58 contained 21 ppb
of acetone, which was also detected in the laboratory blank, and
no TICS.
The sample from well T-35 contained chloroform, 1,2-dichloro-
ethene, 2-butanone, and benzene at less than or equal to 7 ppb.
It also contained TICs totaling 60 ppb comprised of dichloro-
fluro-methane (50 ppb) and l,2-dichloro-1,1,2-t-ethane (10 ppb).
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Operable Unit 1 Quarterly Status Report
November 1989 to February 1990
Hoechst Celanese/Shelby, NC
Westinghouse Project 4124-85-050H
Document Control 85050H-0219
Page 5-8
Analysis of the samples from wells AA-54 and P-58 produced very
similar results. Both samples contained the TCL compounds
acetone(~ 50 ppb) and 2-butanone (~ 6 ppb). Acetone
concentrations are suspect since the laboratory blanks
associated with both samples also contained acetone. The sample
from P-58 contained 50 ppb of the VOA-TIC trimethyl silanol.
The sample from AA-54 contained no TICs.
5.2 Off-site Groundwater Quality
Groundwater quality off-site is represented by monitor wells
HH-48 and potable supply wells at the Martin, Stein, Lambert,
Walker, and Elliott residences (Table 5-3). The sample from
well HH-48, collected November 8, 1989 was the only sample
actually collected during the second quarter. Residence wells
were sampled October 9, 1989, but the laboratory results were
reported too late to be included in the first quarterly report.
The sample from HH-48 was analyzed for volatile organics and
chromium only. A full TCL/TAL scan was performed on all samples
from potable supply wells.
Trichloroethene (140 ppb) and 2-butanone (5 ppb) were the only
TCL compounds detected in the sample from monitor well HH-48.
No TIC compounds were identified in the sample.
5050H189
--~ 0 ~ 0 ~ S'l - --- - --- - ---TABLE 5-3: COHPCl.JNOS/ANALYTES DETECTED IN OFF-SITE \JELLS TCL/TAL PARAMETERS TOTAL COIICENTRATIOtl (ppb) ii OF COMPOJNOS DETECTED METALS (ppb) SAMPLE DATE \JELL # ANALYZED FOR TCL* MONITOR 1JELL 11 /8/89 HH-48 VOA,Cr 145 POTABLE SUPPLY \JELLS 10/5/89 IJalker VOA 3 BN/A BOL Pest/PCS BOL 1AL Lanbert VOA BOL SN/A BOL Pest/PCB BOL TAL Martin VOA BOL SN/A BOL Pest/PCB BOL TAL Elliott VOA BOL SN/A BOL Pest/PCB BOL 1AL Stein VOA BOL SN/A BOL Pest/PCS BOL 1.!L__ TCL coopounds detected: VOA -2-butanone; trichloroethene; chlorobenzene. BN/A -(none) TIC cOfll)Ounds detected: r1c•• BOL 10 60 • 60 14 10 BOL 20 BOL BOL VOA -trimethyl silanol; methyl cyclohexane; 1,2-diinethyl cyclohexane. SN/A -1, 1'·oxybis-benzene, substituted diokane, 8 1.nknowns. TCL* TIC .. EXCEEDING MCLs 2 0 (none) 1 1 0 4 0 (none) 0 ' 0 3 0 (none> 0 2 0 1 0 <none> 0 0 0 2 0 (none) 0 0 0 0 0 'none -- - -0 'U (D 11 llJ O' ~ I-' (D (D [/l IT ZC:: I-'· 0 ::i 0 ::i < I-'· o-o;,:roIT o :::r o a r::orotr1--a r:: o ro (D rn :::r 11 iO ::i (D [/l r:: IT IT I-' llJ 'tl \l) 11 n 11 n °' IT OO(D<O(D ::i w. I-' 11 IT <D llJ IT I-' 110::lO'<: O IT <D I-' [/l "l (/) ""!D!DIT 0, I-' ' O' llJ U1 l\J Ul 11 IT 'tlO..,_::,-,::,:: llJ U1 I (D llJ rn -0 0 OJ I-' 11 (D z U1 tr'<: :,:, I I'<: (D U1 0 0.., 1--'"d I !\JUI <DO \0 I-' O Z \0 11 <0;,:noIT -
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Operable Unit 1 Quarterly Status Report
November 1989 to February 1990
Hoechst Celanese/Shelby, NC
Westinghouse Project 4124-85-0SOH
Document Control 85050H-0219
Page 5-10
The five potable supply wells monitored are located south and
southeast of the plant, in the vicinity of sampled outer tier
wells: T-35, and EE-58. The sample collected from the Walker
residence contained 3 ppb of chlorobenzene. No other TCL
parameters were detected in any of the wells. The detected
concentrations of metals for which regulatory levels have been
established were also all below the MCLs in samples from all
five wells. TICs were the compounds most frequently detected in
samples.
Samples from the Walker and Lambert residences contained the
highest concentrations of TICs. Both contained the VOA-TIC
trimethyl silanol (~ 10 ppb). The sample from the Walker
residence contained 1,1-oxybis-benzene (20 ppb), and a
substituted dioxane (10 ppb). Both residences contained 30 or
more ppb of "unknowns".
The sample from the Martin residence contained 8 ppb of the
VOA-TIC methyl cyclohexane and 6 ppb 1,2-dimethyl cyclohexane.
The remaining two samples contained no VOA-TICs. Samples from
the Martin and Elliott residences contained 10 ppb and 20 ppb
"unknown" BNA-TICs, respectively. The sample from the Stein
residence contained no BNA-TICs.
5050H189
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Operable Unit 1 Quarterly Status Report
November 1989 to February 1990
Hoechst Celanese/Shelby, NC
Westinghouse Project 4124-85-0SOH
Document Control 85050H-0219
Page 6-1
6.0 QUALITY ASSURANCE/QUALITY CONTROL
Quality Assurance/Quality Control (QA/QC) were in accordance
with the Project Operations Plans and Region IV Standard
Operating Procedures. The analyses were done by Hoechst
Celanese personnel for routine operational parameters and by
Industrial and Environmental Analysts, Inc. (IEA) for TOC, TOX,
nutrients, chromium, TCL and TAL analyses. All chromium, TCL,
and TAL analyses were in accordance with Contract Laboratory
Program Protocols.
Appendix IX presents the results of blanks, matrix spikes and
matrix spike duplicates.
5050H189
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Operable Unit 1 Quarterly Status Report
November 1989 to February 1990
Hoechst Celanese/Shelby, NC
Westinghouse Project 4124-85-050H
Document Control 85050H-0219
Page 7-1
7.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Two types of data were collecting during the second quarter of
operation of extraction and remediation systems at the Hoechst
Celanese site in Shelby, North Carolina.
Flow data and water level data were used to evaluate the
effectiveness of pumping in the inner and outer tier extraction
systems. The following conclusions and recommendations are made
based on interpretation of this data.
0
0
5050H191
The inner tier extraction system continued to
experience some problems during the second quarter.
Flow meters give occasional spurious readings due to
air being introduced into the lines. Four of the inner
tier pumps and controls were replaced with QED system
pumps during late January. Since that time, all the
pumps have worked satisfactorily.
From November, 1989 through January, 1990, the inner
and outer tier wells have pumped approximately 250,000
and 6,500,000 gallons, respectively. The inner and
outer tier wells averaged a reported 2700 and 71,000
gallons per day, respectively. The inner tier quantity
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
0
0
Operable Unit 1 Quarterly Status Report
November 1989 to February 1990
Hoechst Celanese/Shelby, NC
Westinghouse Project 4124-85-0SOH
Document Control 85050H-0219
Page 7-2
may be overestimated because of problems with flow
meters.
Pumping in the inner and outer tier wells produced
little or no drawdown in most on-site wells during the
second quarter. Several wells experienced a drop in
water level of less than 0.5 ft between November 9,
and December 6, 1989, followed by progressive rise in
water levels of up to 4 feet during the rest of the
quarter. This trend is probably attributable to
variances in rainfall. The remaining wells experienced
little change: rises or falls of less than 2 feet.
Well drawdown data continued to indicate the need for
two additional outer tier extraction wells: one
between OT-6 and OT-7, and one between OT-7 and OT-8.
Six additional piezometers (also recommended
previously) are needed to better define the water table
in this area.
Analytical data were used to evaluate: 1) the operating
efficiency of the treatment system and 2) the extend of
groundwater contamination in and adjacent to the Hoechst
Celanese site. The following conclusions and recommendations
are drawn from the results:
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
0
0
5050H191
Operable Unit 1 Quarterly Status Report
November 1989 to February 1990
Hoechst Celanese/Shelby, NC
Westinghouse Project 4124-85-0S0H
Document Control 85050H-0219
Page 7-3
Analytical data indicates that the treatment system did
not perform as well as it did last quarter. This is
primarily due to problems with the sequencing batch
reactor (SBR). The SBR unit began experiencing
problems during the third week in October, 1989. It
appears that the SBR problems are a result of shock
organic loadings or possibly other series of external
events. Westinghouse,in conjunction with Davis and
Floyd,has recommended a sampling and testing program to
help define problems relating to the SBR unit. The
inner and outer tier air stripping towers and activated
carbon filters have continued to function properly;
however they appear to remove little contamination.
Data from the second round of sampling performed on
potable supply wells during the first quarter showed
little contamination. Chlorobenzene was detected in
one of the wells. No other target compounds were
detected in the samples. Metal concentrations in all
samples were below the established Maximum Contaminant
Levels (MCLs). The total concentration of tentatively
identified compounds (TICs) was less than 60 ppb in all
samples.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
HC/Shelby Yater Quality Data -System Startup
INNER TIER
Influent 11/1 11/2 11/3 11/4 11/5 11/6 11/7 ----. -------------------------------------.. ------------.. --. -----------------------. ----------... ------ - -.
Influent roe Cmg/lJ
Influent TOX (mg/I)
Influent Conductivity (...-!hos)
Influent pH
Influent coo (mg/lJ
Influent BOO (mg/I)
Influent TSS (mg/I)
Influent NH3-N (mg/I)
Influent Phosphate (mg/l)
SBR
Effluent roe (mg/lJ
Effluent COO (mg/ I J
Effluent BOO (mg/I)
pH
MLSS (mg/I)
MLVSS (mg/I)
NH3-N (mg/I)
00 (mg/I)
MLVSS/MLSS (ratio)
Air Stripping Tower
Effluent Stripping TOC (mg/l)
Effluent Stripping TSS (mg/l)
Carbon Filter
Carbon Effluent TOC (mg/l)
Carbon Effluent TOX (mg/l)
Effluent Conductivity (uMhos)
Effluent pH
Effluent coo (mg/I)
Effluent BOO (mg/I)
% Removal TDC Effluent
X Removal TOX Effluent
% Removal COO Effluent
% Removal BOO Effluent
2030
5.48
8250
9600
64
40.43
0. 71
1950
123.60
7.81
2448.00
2172.00
16.32
8.4
0.89
1832
7.78
1000
29.30
87.88%
99.69%
1300
0.11
5.51
5100
30
800
2540
7.71
2280.00
17 .60
8.6
850
660
0.61
49.23%
5.50 5.49
7875 14700
14 20
3020 3800
7.92 7.75
2232.00 2096.00
17.80 18.00
8.5 8.4
% Removals are relative to influent values
5.50 5.42 5.35
6100 8600 19800
22 23 94
3280 3800 3740
7. 73 7.46 7.48
2248.00 2204 .00 1852.00
17.21 11.00 12.00
9.9 9. 1 8.9
INNER TIER
Influent
Influent TDC (mg/I)
Influent TOX (mg/I)
Influent Conductivity (uMhos)
Influent pH
Influent COO (mg/I)
Influent BOO (mg/I)
Influent TSS •(mg/I)
Influent NH3·N (mg/I)
Influent Phosphate (mg/I>
SBR
Effluent TOC (mg/ I)
Effluent COO (mg/I)
Effluent BOO (mg/ I)
pH
MLSS (mg/I)
MLVSS (mg/I)
NH3·N (mg/I)
00 (mg/I)
MLVSS/MLSS (ratio)
Air Stripping Tower
Effluent Stripping TOC (mg/l)
Effluent Stripping TSS (mg/l)
Carbon Filter
Carbon Effluent TOC Cmg/l)
Carbon Effluent TOX (mg/l)
Effluent Conductivity (uMhos)
Effluent pH
Effluent COO (mg/l)
Effluent BOO (mg/I)
% Removal TOC Effluent
¾ Removal TOX Effluent
% Removal COO Effluent
% Removal BOD Effluent
HC/Shelby Uater Quality Data · System Startup
11/8
5.36
6900
22
9.60
0.59
3860
88.90
7.66
1820.00
1648.00
7.60
8.5
0.91
7.67
3280
84.40
52.46%
11/9
1700
5.40
15300
60
1300
3900
7.50
840.00
4.80
8.7
1300
1200
29.41%
11/10 11/11
5.41 5.51
10000 16300
48 59
4900 4750
7.56 7.31
1800.00 1980.00
3.00 2.28
8.5 8.9
% Removals are relative to influent values
11 /12 11/13
5.54 5. 75
8500 9400
40 54
5000 5460
7.37 7.16
2160.00 1784.00
1.96 2.00
9.4 9.2
11/14
5.58
13100
53
6300
6.91
1680.00
2.88
9.7
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
INNER TIER
Influent
Influent TDC (mg/l)
Influent TOX (mg/l)
Influent Conductivity ("4hos)
Influent pH
Influent COO (mg/ll
Influent BOO (mg/l)
Influent TSS (mg/l l
Influent NH3·N (mg/l)
Influent Phosphate (mg/ l)
SBR
Effluent TOC (mg/ll
Effluent COO (mg/ll
Effluent BOO (mg/l)
pH
MLSS (mg/ l)
MLVSS (mg/l)
NH3·N (mg/l)
00 (mg/l)
MLVSS/MLSS (ratio)
Air Stripping Tower
Effluent Stripping TOC (mg/l)
Effluent Stripping TSS (mg/l)
Carbon Filter
Carbon Effluent TDC (mg/l)
Carbon Effluent TOX (mg/l)
Effluent Conductivity (Uilhos)
Effluent pH
Effluent COO (mg/l)
Effluent BOO (mg/l)
% Removal TOC Effluent
% Removal TOX Effluent
% Removal COO Effluent
% Removal BOO Effluent
HC/Shelby Water Quality Data· System Startup
11/15
5.56
13100
71
15.00
0.30
5600
242.40
7.71
1680.00
1520.00
2.38
8.4
0.90
7.65
3750
242.40
11.3n
11/16
560
5.62
3500
63
1600
5600
7.62
1728.00
0.44
8.6
1500
1200
11/17 11/18
5.56 5.51
2000 1800
80 41
4600 5320
7.72 7.69
1820.00 1760.00
0.62 1.38
8.5 9.5
% Removals are relative to ihfluent values
11/19 11/20
5.40 5.38
2000 2550
. 35 11
4600 4560
7.51 8.00
1920.00 1820.00
3.80 2.38
9.4 9.6
11/21
5.27
1540
15
4000
8.22
1684.00
1.70
8.7
INNER TIER
Influent 11/22
Influent TOC (mg/l) 360
Influent TOX (mg/l)
Influent Conductivity (u,Jhosl
Influent pH 5.20
Influent COO (mg/ll 1480
Influent BOO (mg/ll
Influent TSS .(mg/ l) 9
Influent NH3-N (mg/l) 1.40
Influent Phosphate (mg/l) 0.32
SBR
Effluent TOC (mg/ll 1100
Effluent COO Cmg/l) 4000
Effluent BOO (mg/ l) 683.30
pH 8.01
MLSS (mg/ l) 1932.00
MLVSS (mg/l l 1684.00
NH3-N (mg/l) 3.28
DO (mg/l) 8.4
MLVSS/MLSS (ratio) 0.87
Air Stripping Tower
Effluent Stripping TOC (mg/l) 1100
Effluent Stripping TSS (mg/l)
Carbon Filter
Carbon Effluent TOC (mg/l)
Carbon Effluent TOX (mg/l)
Effluent Conductivity (uMhos)
Effluent pH
Effluent COO (mg/ll
Effluent BOO (mg/l)
% Removal TOC Effluent
% Removal TOX Effluent
X Removal COO Effluent
X Removal BOO Effluent
1200
7.40
4250
1171.40
HC/Shelby ~ater Quality Data -System Startup
11/23 11/24 11 /25 11/26 11/27
5.08 5.20 5.25 5.23 4.60
1960 2640 2140 1620 2000
20 11 7 5 8
3600 3520 3040 3260 2700
8.51 8.35 8.18 8.23 8.49
1772.00 1604.00 1812.00 1648.00 1260.00
2.84 2.12 1.98 1.06 0.77
8.9 8.9 8.7 8.9 9.2
% Removals are relative to influent values
I
I
11/28
I
5.44
1800
4 I
I
2500
8.62 I
1728.00
1.83
9.1 I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
INNER TIER
Influent
Influent TOC (mg/I)
Influent TOX (mg/I)
Influent Conductivity (ur,llhos)
Influent pH
Influent COO (mg/I)
Influent BOO .(mg/l)
Influent TSS (mg/I)
Influent NH3-N (mg/I)
Influent Phosphate (mg/l)
SBR
Effluent T0C (mg/I)
Effluent COO (mg/I)
Effluent BOO (mg/I)
pH
MLSS (mg/I)
MLVSS (mg/ I)
NH3-N (mg/I)
DO (mg/I)
MLVSS/MLSS (ratio)
Air Stripping Tower
Effluent Stripping TDC (mg/l)
Effluent Stripping TSS (mg/l)
Carbon Filter
Carbon Effluent T0C (mg/I)
Carbon Effluent T0X (mg/I)
Effluent Conductivity (ll'1hos)
Effluent pH
Effluent COO (mg/I)
Effluent BOO (mg/I)
% Removal TDC Effluent
% Removal TOX Effluent
% Removal COO Effluent
% Removal BOO Effluent
11/29
8.53
1836.00
1564.00
0.99
8.5
0.85
HC/Shelby ~ater Quality Data -System Startup
11/30
8.97
1680.00
1.10
8.8
% Removals are relative to influent values
INNER TIER
Influent
Influent TOC (mg/l)
Influent TOX (mg/l)
Influent Conductivity (L.Nhos)
Influent pH
Influent COO (mg/l)
Influent BOO (mg/l)
Influent TSS .(mg/ l)
Influent NH3·N (mg/l)
Influent Phosphate (mg/ l)
SBR
Effluent TOC (mg/l l
Effluent COO (mg/l)
Effluent BOO (mg/l)
pH
HLSS (mg/l)
HLVSS (mg/l)
NH3-N (mg/l)
DO (mg/l)
MLVSS/MLSS (ratio)
Air Stripping Tower
Effluent Stripping TDC (mg/l)
Effluent Stripping TSS (mg/l)
Carbon Filter
Carbon Effluent TOC (mg/l)
Carbon Effluent TDX (mg/l)
Effluent Conductivity (L.Nhos)
Effluent pH
Effluent coo (mg/l)
Effluent BOO (mg/l)
¾ Removal TDC Effluent
¾ Removal TDX Effluent
¾ Removal COO Effluent
¾ Removal BOO Effluent
HC/Shelby ~ater Quality Data -System Startup
12/1
6.40
2120
10
1.51
0.44
1600
1000.00
8.84
1800.00
0.64
8.6
7. 12
2400
1698.00
12/2
6.38
1760
7
1600
8.61
1760.00
0.84
6.9
12/3 12/4
6.24 5.93
920 800
10 3
1500 820
8.56 8.48
1724.00 2236.00
1.10 1.41
7.5 9.7
% Removals are relative to influent values
12/5
5.24
1340
7
640
8.16
2460.00
1.05
7.9
12/6
575
5.26
1380
13600
6
1.87
0.21
480
125.00
8.21
2200.00
1904.00
0. 78
7.5
0.87
1227
7.19
630
314.30
54.35%
97.69%
12/7
5.19
1420
4
400
8.79
2360.00
0.96
8.6
130
170
0.00
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
INNER TIER
Influent
Influent roe Cmg/l)
Influent TOX (mg/l)
Influent Conductivity C l.f4hos)
Influent pH
Influent COO Cmg/l)
Influent BOO (mg/l)
Influent TSS "(mg/l)
Influent NH3·N (mg/l)
Influent Phosphate (mg/ l)
SBR
Effluent roe (mg/l)
Effluent COO (mg/l)
Effluent BOO (mg/l)
pH
MLSS (mg/l)
MLVSS (mg/ l)
NH3·N (mg/l) oo (mg/l)
MLVSS/HLSS (ratio)
Air Stripping Tower
Effluent Stripping TDC (mg/l)
Effluent Stripping TSS (mg/l)
Carbon Filter
carbon Effluent roe (mg/l)
Carbon Effluent TOX (mg/l)
Effluent Conductivity (uMhos)
Effluent pH
Effluent COO (mg/l)
Effluent BOO (mg/l)
% Removal TOC Effluent
% Removal TOX Effluent
% Removal COO Effluent
% Removal BOO Effluent
HC/Shelby ~ater Quality Data -System Startup
12/8 12/9 12/10 12/11
5.20 6.32 5.53 5.92
1300 200 2860 1780
25 10 15 BO
325
8.50 8.90 8.84
1800.00 1640.00 2148.00
0.48 0.20 1.02
7. 1 8.5 8.9
% Removals are relative to influent values
12/12
6.06
3920
91
340
7.79
2008.00
2 .15
7.5
12/13
5.93
2600
10
11 .60
0.20
170
340
69.10
8.94
2052.00
1880.00
1.97
8.0
0.92
7.92
425
129. 10
83.65%
12/14
2900
5.78
3640
30
BO
390
8.30
2240.00
0.21
8.4
47
140
95.17°/4
INNER TIER
Influent
Influent TOC {mg/ I l
Influent TOX (mg/l)
Influent Conductivity (uMhosJ
Influent pH
Influent COO (mg/ll
Influent BOO (mg/l)
Influent TSS ·cmg/ l)
Influent NH3·N (mg/I)
Influent Phosphate (mg/I J
SBR
Effluent TOC (mg/ l l
Effluent coo (mg/ll
Effluent BOO (mg/ l l
pH
MLSS (mg/ l)
MLVSS (mg/I J
NH3·N (mg/I)
DO (mg/I)
MLVSS/MLSS (ratio)
Air Stripping Tower
Effluent Stripping TOC (mg/l)
Effluent Stripping TSS (mg/l)
Carbon Filter
Carbon Effluent TOC (mg/l)
Carbon Effluent TOX (mg/l)
Effluent Conductivity (uMhos)
Effluent pH
Effluent coo (mg/I)
Effluent BOO (mg/I)
% Removal TOC Effluent
¾ Removal TOX Effluent
X Removal coo Effluent
¾ Removal BOO Effluent
HC/Shelby Water Quality Data -System Startup
12/15 12/16 12/17 12/18
5.89 5.84 6.03 s.n
4000 6809 3360 3150
80 30 50 10
470 500 475 575
8.26 7.27 8.91 8.83
2788.00 2696.00 2560.00 2308.00
3.20 3.18 3.24 2.42
8.2 5. 1 7.9 7.9
¾ Removals are relative to influent values
12/19
5.90
3600
15
500
8.80
1920.00
1.90
8.0
12/20
5.34
1260
10
2.46
0.25
650
195.00
8.80
2592.00
2160.00
2. 15
7.1
0.83
7.81
670
225.00
46.83%
I
I
12/21
400 I
5.62
3540 I 26
I
120
530 I 8.75
2360.00
0.80
7.8 I
I 120
I
200
I
50.00% I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
INNER TIER
Influent
Influent TOC (mg/l)
Influent TOX (mg/l)
Influent Conductivity (i.1hos)
Influent pH
Influent COO (mg/l)
Influent BOO (mg/l)
Influent TSS (mg/l)
Influent NH3·N (mg/l)
Influent Phosphate (mg/ l)
SBR
Effluent TOC (mg/l >
Effluent COO (mg/ l)
Effluent BOO (mg/l)
pH
MLSS (mg/l)
MLVSS (mg/l)
NH3·N (mg/l)
00 (mg/l)
MLVSS/MLSS (ratio)
Air Stripping Tower
Effluent Stripping TDC (mg/l)
Effluent Stripping TSS (mg/l)
Carbon Filter
Carbon Effluent TOC (mg/l)
Carbon Effluent TOX (mg/l)
Effluent Conductivity (U'lhos)
Effluent pH
Effluent COO (mg/l)
Effluent BOO (mg/l)
% Removal TOC Effluent
% Removal TOX Effluent
% Removal coo Effluent
% Removal BOO Effluent
HC/Shelby ~ater Quality Data -System Startup
12/22 12/23 12/24 12/25
5.80 5.63 5.65 5.69
2100 8250 7500 8150
61 50 30 27
575 600 810
8.90 8.56 8.70 8.80
3028.00 2360.00 2560.00 2040.00
5.20 3.00 1.75 2.26
7.7 8.0 8.4 7. 1
% Removals are relative to influent values
12/26
5.84
8260
58
900
8.99
2492.00
2.83
7. 1
12/27
5.90
16500
63
19.00
1.48
1800
666.70
8.99
2452.00
2072.00
3.05
6.5
0.85
7.49
440
633.30
97 .33%
12/28
880
5.84
13500
70
550
2040
8.99
2720.00
5.00
8. 1
540
520
40.91%
INNER TIER
Influent
Influent roe Cmg/1 >
Influent TOX (mg/I)
Influent Conductivity (l.lolhos)
Influent pH
Influent coo (mg/I)
Influent BOO (mg/I)
Influent TSS (mg/I)
Influent NH3-N (mg/I)
Influent Phosphate (mg/ I)
SBR
Effluent roe Cmg/1)
Effluent coo (mg/ I)
Effluent BOO (mg/ I)
pH
MLSS (mg/I)
MLVSS (mg/ I)
NH3-N (mg/I)
00 (mg/I)
MLVSS/MLSS (ratio)
Air Stripping Tower
Effluent Stripping TDC (mg/l)
Effluent Stripping TSS (mg/l)
Carbon Filter
Carbon Effluent TOC (mg/l)
Carbon Effluent TOX (mg/l)
Effluent Conductivity (uMhos)
Effluent pH
Effluent COO (mg/I)
Effluent BOO (mg/I)
% Removal roe Effluent
% Removal TOX Effluent
% Removal COO Effluent
% Removal 800 Effluent
HC/Shelby Water Quality Data -System Startup I
I
12/29 12/30 12/31
I
5.81 5.97 6.06
11200 7000 3125
52 50 40 I
I
2540 3000 3000
8. 71 8.91 8.40 I
2400.00 2560.00 2360.00
6.44 6.00 3.80
7.0 8.4 8.2 I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
% Removals are relative to influent values I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
INNER TIER
Influent
Influent roe (mg/I)
Influent TOX (mg/l)
Influent Conductivity (~hos)
Influent pH
Influent COO (mg/l)
Influent BOO (mg/I)
Influent TSS (mg/I)
Influent NH3·N (mg/I)
Influent Phosphate (mg/l)
SBR
Effluent roe (mg/I)
Effluent COO (mg/I)
Effluent BOO (mg/I)
pH
MLSS (mg/I)
MLVSS (mg/I)
NH3-N (mg/I)
DO (mg/I)
MLVSS/MLSS (ratio)
Air Stripping Tower
Effluent Stripping TOC (mg/l)
Effluent Stripping TSS (mg/l)
Carbon Filter
Carbon Effluent TOC (mg/l)
Carbon Effluent TOX (mg/l)
Effluent Conductivity (uMhos)
Effluent pH
Effluent COO (mg/I)
Effluent BOO (mg/I)
% Removal TOC Effluent
% Removal TOX Effluent
% Removal coo Effluent
% Removal BOO Effluent
HC/Shelby Water Quality Data· System Startup
1 /1
5.89
4875
39
3350
8. 75
2240
2.80
8.1
1/2
6.20
2050
9
3500
8.92
2592
4.12
7.9
1/3 1/4
8.91 8.81
2936 3516
2412
4.00 3.40
7.9 8.0
0.82
% Removals are relative to influent values
1/5 1/6
8.55 8.35
2928 2764
2.28 6.00
7.7 8.0
1/7
8.45
3484
3.40
6.0
INNER TIER
Influent
Influent TOC (mg/I)
Influent TOX (mg/I)
Influent Conductivity (Lfihos)
Influent pH
Influent coo (mg/I)
Influent BOO (mg/ I)
Influent TSS (mg/I)
Influent NH3-N (mg/I)
Influent Phosphate (mg/ I)
SBR
Effluent TDC (mg/I)
Effluent COO (mg/ L l
Effluent BOO (mg/ I l
pH
MLSS (mg/I)
MLVSS (mg/I)
NH3·N (mg/I)
DO (mg/I)
MLVSS/MLSS (ratio)
Air Stripping Tower
Effluent Stripping TOC (mg/l)
Effluent Stripping TSS (mg/l)
Carbon Filter
Carbon Effluent TOC (mg/l)
Carbon Effluent TOX (mg/l)
Effluent Conductivity (uMhos)
Effluent pH
Effluent coo (mg/I)
Effluent BOO (mg/I)
% Removal TOC Effluent
% Removal TOX Effluent
¾ Removal coo Effluent
% Removal BOO Effluent
HC/Shelby Water Quality Data -System Startup
1/8
1800
8.60
3012
12.70
4.6
1/9
2,200
0.08
600
1500
8.41
3528
13.80
5.2
550
600
0.53
72. 73%
1/10
838
5.84
1900
1500
5
2.50
0.85
1050
116.7
8.30
2944
2420
12.40
6.3
0.82
1752
7.00
1500
1667.00
21.05%
1 /11
510
6.00
8750
45
270
850
8.25
3184
16.40
4.2
250
300
41.18%
% Removals are relative to influent values
1/12 1/13
5.77 5.83
10000 12750
43 40
500 375
8.52 8.92
1120 1248
13.00 16.91
6.0 5.8
I
I
1/14
I
5. 72
5000
30 I
I
380
8.63 I
1040
25.10
7.3 I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
INNER TIER
Influent
Influent TOC (mg/l)
Influent TOX (mg/l)
Influent Conductivity
Influent pH
Influent COO Cmg/ll
Influent BOO (mg/l)
Influent TSS (mg/l)
Influent NH3·N (mg/l)
(u4hos)
Influent Phosphate (mg/ I>
SBR
Effluent TOC (mg/I)
Effluent coo (mg/ l)
Effluent BOO (mg/ I>
pH
HLSS (mg/I)
HLVSS (mg/I)
NH3-N (mg/I)
DO (mg/I)
MLVSS/MLSS (ratio)
Air Stripping Tower
Effluent Stripping TOC (mg/l)
Effluent Stripping TSS (mg/l)
Carbon Filter
Carbon Effluent TOC (mg/l)
Carbon Effluent TOX (mg/l)
Effluent Conductivity (t.Ji!hos)
Effluent pH
Effluent COO (mg/l)
Effluent BOO (mg/l)
% Removal TDC Effluent
% Removal TOX Effluent
% Removal COO Effluent
% Removal BOO Effluent
HC/Shelby Yater Quality Data -System Startup
1/15 1/16
5.73 5.96
2000 1750
32 6
410
8.77 8.92
3600 3540
21.40 45.30
6.5 6.2
1/17
6.06
1700
200
3.40
0.46
535
78.8
8.77
3288
2792
28.30
6.7
0.85
7.09
750
511.00
55.88%
1/18
620
5.98
2000
238
59
600
8.82
3880
29.60
6.0
73
78
87 .42%
% Removals are relative to influent values
1/19 1/20
5.74 5.61
2000 2250
10 6
520 550
8.85 8.92
3348 3612
31.00 39.90
7. 1 6.2
1/21
5.69
1850
10
500
8.92
3500
25.80
5.8
INNER TIER
Influent
Influent TOC (mg/l)
Influent TOX (mg/l)
Influent Conductivity (lJl!hos)
Influent pH
Influent COO (mg/l)
Influent BOO (mg/l)
Influent TSS (mg/l)
Influent NH3·N (mg/l)
Influent Phosphate (mg/l)
SBR
Effluent TOC (mg/l)
Effluent COO (mg/l)
Effluent BOO (mg/l)
pH
MLSS (mg/l)
MLVSS (mg/l)
NH3·N (mg/l)
DO (mg/l)
MLVSS/MLSS (ratio)
Air Stripping Tower
Effluent Stripping TOC (mg/l)
Effluent Stripping TSS (mg/l)
Carbon Filter
Carbon Effluent TOC (mg/l)
Carbon Effluent TOX (mg/l)
Effluent Conductivity (lJl!hos)
Effluent pH
Effluent COO (mg/l)
Effluent BOO (mg/l)
% Removal TOC Effluent
% Removal TOX Effluent
X Removal COO Effluent
X Removal BOO Effluent
HC/Shelby Water Quality Data -System Startup
1/22 1/23 1/24
5.46 5.84 6.10.
2700 2300 10500
8 6 139
33.75
0.51
640 550
8.93 8.99 8.81
2608 2840 2840
2392
32.10 30.19 44.25
7.2 7.8 5.3
0.84
1/25
1,500
5. 71
2100
13
45
450
76.4
8.98
3076
24.30
6.3
47
77
7.36
650
243.00
94.87%
69.05%
X Removals are relative to influent values
1/26 1/27
5.69 5. 73
12375 11250
272 240
420 450
8.49 8.55
2640 2720
26.80 20.00
7.4 8.2
I
I
1/28
I
5.62
10875
210 I
I
595
8.56 I
2680
13.10
8.0 I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
INNER TIER
Influent
Influent TOC (mg/l)
Influent TOX (mg/l)
Influent Conductivity (~hos)
Influent pH
Influent COO (mg/l)
Influent BOO (mg/l)
Influent TSS (mg/l)
Influent NH3·N (mg/l)
Influent Phosphate Cmg/l)
SBR
Effluent TOC (mg/I)
Effluent COO (mg/I)
Effluent BOO (mg/I)
pH
MLSS (mg/ l)
MLVSS (mg/I)
NH3·N (mg/l)
00 (mg/I)
MLVSS/HLSS (ratio)
Air Stripping Tower
Effluent Stripping TOC (mg/l)
Effluent Stripping TSS (mg/l)
Carbon Filter
Carbon Effluent TOC (mg/l)
Carbon Effluent TOX (mg/I)
Effluent Conductivity (t..Nhos)
Effluent pH
Effluent COO (mg/l)
Effluent BOO (mg/I)
% Removal TOC Effluent
% Removal TOX Effluent
% Removal coo Effluent
% Removal BOO Effluent
1/29
5. 70
10800
104
8.31
3596
22.30
4.0
HC/Shelby ~ater Quality Data· System Startup
1/30
5.62
7125
55
600
8.94
3108
21.50
5.3
8.13
700
90.18%
1/31
5. 75
5025
17
8.10
0.79
535
8.57
3172
2680
19.50
6.3
0.84
% Removals are relative to influent values
-------------------
MLSS VS MLVSS in SBR
8000 1.00
7500
7000 * * * 0.90
6500 * * *
6000 * * * * * * * * ~
-....__ 5500 * 0.80 0 U> * E ...,
5000 * * 0
~ 0:::
(/) 4500 (/)
(/) (/) > 0.70 _J
_J :::;: :::;: 4000 0 -....__
~ 0 0 (/)
0 (/)
(/) 3500 * >
* 80 0 _J (/) :::;: _J 3000 * @ J€) (ID 0.60 :::;: 0 ([S~ *
2500 ~ 0* ~ 0 0 0 -l ** 0 0 2000 * * * 0 * * 0.50
1500
1000
500 0.40
8/1 10/1 12/1 1 /31
-MLSS O· MLVSS · * · ML VSS/MLSS Ratio
I
Q_
10.00
9.00 +
+
+ +
8.00 +
+ 7.00 +
6.00
5.00
4.00
Inner Tier pH
+ + + +
+ + +
+
+ +
+
+ +
+ +
+ +
3.00+--------------+-------------f---------------,
8/1 10/1 12/1 1/31
Inner Tier Influent · + · Inner Tier Effluent
-------------------
-------------------
Inner Tier BOD
Influent vs. Effluent
100000 * * 100.00%
* *
*
99.50%
10000 \ ~
------Ol
E 99.00% ~ 0 0 ~ -0 ~ C 1000 ~ (l) :::, 0 0 ;;::: 0 -> w 0 0
o'8 0 0 98.50% E 0 QJ -0::
C 0 0 (l) 100 :::, 0 0 ;;::: CD C 98.00%
0 0 0 0 0 CD 0 * 10
0 0 97.50%
0 0 0
0
1 0 97.00%
8/1 10/1 12/1 1 /31
-BOD Influent ·O· BOD Effluent · * · BOD Removal %
Inner Tier TOC Influent vs. Effluent 1 O,OOO~JOOs* ~\ * * * T 100.00% *l ~~ * * * * * * ~ A\ t 90.00% * ~ 1,000 . I 0 0 0 t80.00% " CT> 0 0 E 0 ~ * ~ 0 70.00% ~ C ~ (I) 0 :, 0 0 c;:: 0 -0 0 > w 100 0~ 60.00% 0 E ~ 0 0 0 (l) ~ 0 0 0:: C (l) 0 :, _w cm * * 50.00% 0 -Oo f--C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 * "* 140.00% f--0 0 * 30.00% 1 +----------+----------+----------+20.00% 8/1 10/1 12/1 1/31 -TOC Influent · 0 · TOC Effluent · * · TOC Removal % -------------------
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
rn
Sample t
l
2
3
4
1
2
3
4
IEA Project#:
Client Name:
Client ID
Martin
Elliott
Bottle Blank
Stien
Martin
Elliott
Bottle Blank
Stien
IEA LABORATORY RESULTS
619-072
Hoechst Celanese Corporation
Parameter
Total Organic Carbon
Total Organic Carbon
Total Organic Carbon
Total Organic carbon
Total Organic Halide
Total Organic Halide
Total Organic Halide
Total organic Halide
Results
5.8 mg/L
2.4 mg/L
0.71 mg/L
3.7 mg/L
<0.010 mg/L
<0.010 mg/L
<0.010 mg/L
0.032 mg/L
Date
Analyzed
10/24/89
10/24/89
10/24/89
10/24/89
10/10/89
10/10/89
10/10/89
10/10/89
r= 1m I
I
I
Sample#
-
IEA Project #:
Client Name:
Client ID
■
IEA LABORATORY RESULTS
619-082
Hoechst Celanese Corporation
Parameter Results
Date
Analyzed I
I
I
I
I
=========================================================================================
2 #2 I Tier C Inf Ammonia-N <0.1
2 #2 I Tier C Inf Phosphate as P <0.40
1 #1 0 Tier C Inf Total Organic Carbon 33
2 #2 I Tier C Inf Total Organic Carbon 840
3 #4 SBR Effluent Total Organic carbon 79
4 #5 O Tier T Eff Total Organic carbon 6.8
5 #6 I Tier T Eff Total Organic Carbon 34
6 #7 Outer Effluent Total Organic Carbon 14
7 #8 Inner Effluent Total Organic carbon 54
I Comments:
*Quantitation limit elevated due to sample matrix interferencesa
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Sampling date: 10/19/89
mg/L 10/24/89
mg/L* 10/26/89
mg/L 11/03/89
mg/L 11/03/89
mg/L 11/03/89
mg/L 11/03/89
mg/L 11/03/89
mg/L 11/03/89
mg/L 11/03/89
rn
IEA Project#:
Client Name:
Sample# Client ID
IEA LABORATORY RESULTS
619-083
Hoechst Celanese Corporation
Parameter Results
I
I
I
Date ■
Analyze'9 ===========================================================================================
1 #1 Outer Influent Total organic Carbon
2 12 Inner Influent Total Organic Carbon
4.3 mg/L 11/08/8j
2,700 mg/L 11/08/8
3 #4 SBR Effluent Total Organic Carbon
4 #5 o. Tier T. Eff. Total Organic Carbon
5 #6 I. Tier T. Eff. Total organic Carbon
180 mg/L 11/08/89
8.5 mg/L 11/08/81
220 mg/L 11/08/8
6 #7 Outer Effluent Total Organic Carbon 5. 8 mg/L 11/08/89
7 #8 Inner Effluent Total Organic Carbon 120 mg/L 11/08/81
Samples taken 10/26/89 I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Sample '
IEA Project t:
Client Name:
Client ID
IEA LABORATORY RESULTS
619-084
Hoechst Celanese Corporation
Date
Parameter Results Analyzed
I
I
I
I
I
I
==============================================================================••-•==•===-
l FF-62
2 C-49
3 FF-34
4 D-35
5 FF-23
6 D-58
l FF-62
2 C-49
3 FF-34
4 D-35
5 FF-23
I Sampling date: 11/01/89
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Total organic
Total organic
Total Organic
Total organic
Total Organic
Total Organic
Total Organic
Total organic
Total Organic
Total Organic
Total Organic
Carbon 0.74 mg/L 11/16/89
Carbon 3.6 mg/L 11/16/89
Carbon 3.6 mg/L 11/16/89
Carbon 28 mg/L 11/16/89
Carbon 0.86 mg/L 11/16/89
Carbon 4.5 mg/L 11/16/89
Halide 0.25 mg/L 11/08/89
Halide ·1.4 mg/L 11/08/89
Halide 0.012 mg/L 11/08/89
Halide 1.0 mg/L 11/08/89
Halide <0.010 mg/L 11/08/89
~ ~
Sample t
l
2
3
4
5
6
7
l
2
6
7
IEA Proj act t:
Client Name:
Client ID
u O Tier C Inf
#2 I Tier C Inf
#4 SBR Effluent
#5 0 Tier T Eff
t6 I Tier T Eff
t7 Outer Effluent
#8 Inner Effluent
u O Tier c Inf
#2 I Tier C Inf
t7 Outer Effluent
#8 Inner Effluent
Sampling date: ll/02/89
IEA LABORATORY RESULTS
619-087
Hoechst Celanese Corporation
Parameter
Total Organic Carbon
Total Organic Carbon
Total organic Carbon
Total Organic Carbon
Total organic Carbon
Total organic Carbon
Total Organic Carbon
Total organic Halide
Total Organic Halide
Total Organic Halide
Total Organic Halide
Results
17 mg/L
1,300 mg/L
800 mg/L
9.5 mg/L
850 mg/L
11 mg/L
660 mg/L
'0.96 mg/L
0.11 mg/L
l.l mg/L
0.61 mg/L
I
I
I
Date I
Analyzed
11/16/89
11/16/89
11/16/89
11/16/89
ll/16/89
11/16/89
11/16/89
11/10/89
11/10/89
11/10/89
11/10/89
I
I
I
I I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
'
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
IEA Project#:
Client Name:
Sample# Client ID
IEA LABORATORY RESULTS
619-088
Hoechst Celanese Corporation
Parameter Results
Date
Analyzed
=========================================================================================
l
2
l
2
HH-48
EE-58
HH-48
EE-58
Total
Total
Total
Total
•samples taken on 11/07/89
Organic Carbon
Organic Carbon
organic Halide
Organic Halide
4.6 mg/L
6. 5 mg/L
0. 74 mg/L
1.5 mg/L
11/17/89
11/17/89
11/10/89
11/10/89
rn
IEA Project I:
Client Name:
Sample t Client ID
IEA LABORATORY RESULTS
619-090
Hoechst Celanese Corporation
Parameter Results
I
I
I
Date
Analyzed I =========================================================================================
1 GG-25 Total organic
2 GG-61 Total organic
3 GG-39 Total Organic
4 T-35 Total organic
5 T-58 Total organic
1 GG-25 Total Organic
2 GG-61 Total Organic
3 GG-39 Total Organic
4 T-35 Total Organic
5 T-58 Total organic
Sampling date: 11/03/89
carbon 5.1
Carbon 15
Carbon 23
Carbon 14
Carbon 10
Halide 1.2
Halide 1.7
Halide 1.7
Halide 0.95
Halide 0.96
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
11/16/89
11/16/89
11/16/89
11/16/89
11/16/89
11/09/89
11/09/89
11/09/89
11/09/89
11/09/89
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
rn
IEA Project t:
Client Name:
Sample t Client ID
IEA LABORATORY RESULTS
619-091
Hoechst Celanese Corporation
Parameter Results
Date
Analyzed
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
===============================================================================-=======•
l AA-54
2 P-58
3 CC-33
4 CC-64
l AA-54
2 P-58
3 CC-33
I Sampling date: ll/08/89
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Total
Total
Total
Total
Total
Total
Total
Organic carbon 31 mg/L ll/21/89
Organic Carbon 5.6 mg/L ll/21/89
Organic Carbon 33 mg/L ll/21/89
Organic Carbon 12 mg/L ll/21/89
Organic Halide l.l mg/L ll/14/89
organic Halide l.l mg/L ll/14/89
organic Halide o.ee mg/L ll/14/89
IEA Project #:
Client Name:
IEA LABORATORY RESULTS
619-094
Hoechst Celanese Corporation
I
I
I
::'.'.'.~=~-~---~=~~~=-=~--------~:~:'.'.'.~=~~---------------------==--=-:==~==~----=====::I~=~=•
l
2
3
4
5
6
7
3
4
7
0-25
K-58
N-53
K-28
N-29
J-28
V-23
N-53
K-28
V-23
Samples taken 11/09/89
Total
Total
Total
Total
Total
Total
Total
Total
Total
Total
Organic
organic
Organic
organic
Organic
Organic
Organic
Organic
Organic
Organic
Carbon
Carbon
Carbon
Carbon
Carbon
Carbon
Carbon
Halide
Halide
Halide
41
1,500
5.0
1,900
10
36
6,600
1.4
0.60
1.3
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
I 11/28/89
11/28/89
11/28/89
11/28/89 I
11/28/89
11/28/89
11/28/89 I
11/15/89
11/15/89
11/15/89
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
rn
Sample#
l
2
3
4
5
6
7
IEA Project #:
Client Name:
Client ID
#1 o Tier c Inf
t2 I Tier C Inf
t4 SBR Effluent
#5 0 Tier T Eff
i6 I Tier T Eff
t7 outer Effluent
#8 Inner Effluent
I Sampling date: 11/09/89
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
IEA LABORATORY RESULTS
619-096
Hoechst Celanese Corporation
Parameter
Total organic Carbon
Total organic Carbon
Total organic Carbon
Total organic Carbon
Total Organic Carbon
Total Organic Carbon
Total Organic Carbon
Results
13 mg/L v
1700 mg/L ,,,
1300 mg/L/
8.2 mg/L '
1300 mg/L ./
6.9 mg/L .
1200 mg/L /
Date
Analyzed
11/29/89
11/29/89
11/29/89
11/29/89
11/29/89
11/29/89
11/29/89
IEA Project f:
Client Name:
IEA LABORATORY RESULTS
619-098
Hoechst Celanese Corporation
I
I
I
I
Date
:::~===~===~===~==~~-=======:::::::=========================-=~=~:::=====---~:::=. I
l J-59 Total organic Carbon 6.7
Sampling date: 11/10/89
mg/L 11/29/89 I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
IEA LABORATORY RESULTS
IEA Project t: 619-099
Client Name, Hoechst Celanese corporation
sample t Client ID Parameter Results
=•===•==-===•••••••••=••••-•-•-•-•••-a==•-••=•-•••---•-••••••
l tl o Tier c Inf
2 12 I Tier C Inf
3 t4 SBR Effluent
4 ts 0 Tier T Eff
5 16 I Tier T Eff
6 t7 0 Effluent
7 t8 I Effluent
8 T-17
9 Trip Blank
Sampling date 11/15/89
T-17
Trip Blank
Sampling date 11/16/89
tl o Tier C Inf
12 I Tier C Inf
t4 SBR Effluent
ts 0 Tier T Eff
t6 I Tier T Eff
t7 0 Effluent
ta I Effluent
Total Organic Carbon 27 mg/L
Total organic Carbon 560 mg/L
Total Organic Carbon 1600 mg/L
Total Organic Carbon 2.8 mg/L
Total Organic Carbon 1500 mg/L
Total organic Carbon 6.1 mg/L
Total Organic Carbon 1200 mg/L
Total Organic Carbon 43 mg/L
Total organic Carbon 5.8 mg/L
Date
Analyzed --
12/04/89
12/04/89
12/04/89
12/04/89
12/04/89
12/04/89
12/04/89
12/04/89
12/04/89
IEA Project t:
Client Name:
Sample t Client ID
l u o Tier c Inf
2 #2 I Tier C Inf
3 t4 SBR Effluent
4 ts O Tier T Eff
5 16 I Tier T Eff
6 t7 Outer Effluent
7 ta Inner Effluent
Sampling date: 11/22/89
IEA LABORATORY RESULTS
619-100
Celanese Fibers
Parameter
Total Organic Carbon
Total Organic Carbon
Total Organic Carbon
Total Organic Carbon
Total organic Carbon
Total organic Carbon
Total Organic Carbon
I
I
I
I
Date
Results Analyzed I
47 mg/L
360 mg/L
1,100 mg/L
12/11/89 I 12/11/89
12/14/89
6.3 mg/L
1,100 mg/L
2.3 mg/L
12/14/89 I 12/14/89
12/14/89
1,200 mg/L 12/14/89
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Sample t
l
2
3
l
2
IEA Project t,
Client Name,
Client ID
FF-34
EE-58
Trip Blank
FF-34
EE-58
I Sampling date, 12/01/89
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
IEA LABORATORY RESULTS
619-101
Hoechst Celanese Corporation
Parameter
Total organic Carbon
Total organic Carbon
Total Organic Carbon
Total organic Halide
Total organic Halide
Results
l.9 mg/L
1.9 mg/L
6.1 mg/L
0.67 mg/L
0.41 mg/L
Date
Analyzed
12/21/89
12/21/89
12/21/89
12/06/89
12/06/89
. . , , . • , , . t . . .. . . . ,
IEA Project t,
Client Name,
IEA LABORATORY RESULTS
619-102
Hoechst celanese Fibers
......,.
Date
I
I
I
:~:.! .. a::::::.:~--------::::e.::: ____________________ :::~::: .. =---~::::.8!. I
1
2
3
tl o. Tier c. Inf.
ts o. Tier T. Eff.
17 o. Effluent
Samples taken on 11/30/89.
Total organic Carbon
Total Organic Carbon
Total Organic Carbon
, 6. 3 mg/L 12/27/89
· 4.5 mg/L 12/27/89
4.7 mg/L 12/27/89 I
I
I
I
·I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Sample t
IEA Project t,
Client Name,
Client ID
IEA LABORATORY RESULTS
619-104
Hoechst Celanese corporation
Parameter Results
Date
Analyzed
====-=•-------------------------------------------------------
1 T-35 Total organic Carbon 37 mg/L 12/27/89
2 CC-33 Total Organic Carbon 16 mg/L 12/27/89
3 Trip Blank Total Organic Carbon 3.9 mg/L 12/27/89
1 T-35 Total Organic Halide 0.21 mg/L 12/07/89
2 CC-33 Total organic Halide 0.038 mg/L 12/07/89
Sampling date, 12/05/89
rn
Sample t
IEA Project t,
Client Name,
Client ID
IEA LABORATORY RESULTS
619-105
Hoechst celanese corporation
Date
Parameter Results Analyzed
=mama•-•---••••--•••--••-•-•-•••---•••--••-•-••--••---------
l K-28 Total Organic Carbon 1,600 mg/L 12/28/89
2 V-23 Total organic Carbon 5,300 mg/L 12/28/89
1 K-28 Total organic Halide 1.2 mg/L 12/12/89
2 V-23 Total Organic Halide 0.66 mg/L 12/12/89
3 Trip Blank Total Organic Halide 0.012 mg/L 12/12/89
Sampling date, 12/06/89
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
• ' ·---·· ,· • > --~ " ' '1 '
I
m
GC/MS PURGEABLES
EPA METHOD 624 COMPOUNDS
IEA Sample Number: 619-106-l
Elliott
12/19/89
Sample Identification:
Date.Analyzed:
Number Compound
1 Benzene
2 Bromodichloromethane
3 Bromoform
4 Bromomethane
5 carbon tetrachloride
6 Chlorobenzene
7 Chloroethane
8 .2-Chloroethylvinyl ether
9 Chloroform
10 Chloromethane
ll Dibromochloromethane
12 1,2-Dichlorobenzene
13 1,3-Dichlorobenzene
14 1,4-Dichlorobenzene
15 1,1-Dichloroethane
16 1,2-Dichloroethane
17 1,1-0ichloroethene
18 Total-1,2-Dichloroethene
19 1,2-Dichloropropane
20 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
21 trans-l,3-Dichloropropene
22 Ethylbenzene
23 Methylene chloride
24 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
25 Tetrachloroethene
26 Toluene
27 1,1,1-Trichloroethane
28 1,1,2-Trichloroethane
29 Trichloroethane
30 Trichlorofluoromethane
31 Vinyl Chloride
Comments:
BQL = Below Quantitation Limit
Sampling date: 12/07/89
FORM 624 Rev. 101989
By: Casto
Quantitation
Limit
(ug/L)
5
5
5
lO
5
5
lO
5
5
10
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
10
Results
concentration
(ug/L)
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
··1-·--··· · .. , .. ,., ,, .-·r· , -, : , •1,.· -~ . '
IEA LABORATORY RESULTS
IEA Project t: 619-109
Client Name, Hoechst Celanese corporation
I
I
I
I
Date =~:n!=_:::~•-••n=-~:::: __ __,••--m•nm~nn•===~~-----~ 1
l #4 SBR Effluent Total Organic carbon 170 mg/L 12/13/89 I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
rn
Sample #
l
2
3
4
5
l
2
3
IEA Project t:
Client Name:
Client ID
u 0 Tier c Inf
17 0 Effluent
ta I Effluent
ts 0 Tier T Eff
#6 I Tier T Eff
u 0 Tier c Inf
t7 0 Effluent
#8 I Effluent
I Sampling date: 12/07/89
I Comments:
IEA LABORATORY RESULTS
619-110
Hoechst Celanese corporation
Parameter Results
Total Organic Carbon /6. 5 mg/L
Total Organic Carbon / 2. 7 mg/L
Total Organic Carbon ,170 mg/L
Total Organic Carbon 4.9 mg/L
Total Organic carbon v·l30 mg/L
Total Organic Halide ~ 0.043 mg/L
Total organic Halide 0.016 mg/L
Total organic Halide ,, <O. 50 mg/L*
*Quantitation limit elevated due to sample matrix interference.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Date
Analyzed
12/29/89
12/29/89
12/29/89
12/29/89
12/29/89
12/22/89
12/22/89
12/22/89
rn
IEA Project t:
Client Name:
IBA LABORATORY RESULTS
619-lll
Hoechst Celanese corporation
Date
I
I
I
Sample t
::ama:aa•••••~••-••••••-••••••-••-••-•••••-••••••••••••••••••••--••-•• I Client ID Parameter Results .Analyzed
1 14 SBR Effluent Total Organic Carbon 80 mg/L 12/19/89 I
I
I
sampling date: 12/14/89 I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
---------
Nil re FT 0%?-ii-:tf' • e ;;:zw:: ,m tt:@n ·Tf:< r P •rn I
I
Sample #
1
2
3
4
5
6
IEA Project#:
Client Name:
Client ID
u o. Tier c. Inf.
12 I. Tier c. Inf.
#5 o. Tier T. Eff.
16 I. Tier T. Eff.
#7 o. Effluent
#8 I. Effluent
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Samples taken on 12/14/89.
IEA LABORATORY RESULTS
619-1110
Hoechst Celanese Corporation
Parameter
Total organic Carbon
Total Organic Carbon
Total Organic Carbon
Total Organic Carbon
Total Organic Carbon
Total Organic carbon
Results
·J. 9 mg/L
· 2,900 mg/L
4.7 mg/L
, 47 mg/L
5.9 mg/L
. 140 mg/L
Date
Analyzed
01/04/90
01/04/90
01/04/90
01/04/90
01/04/90
01/04/90
IEA Project#:
Client Name:
IEA LABORATORY RESULTS
619-113
Hoechst Celanese Corporation
Date
I
I
I
I
Sample # Client ID Parameter Results AnalyzedJ
---------------==-=--==---------=-=======-=-=---=---==-===------=-==--=========••aaaaaaaa
l #1 o. Tier c. Inf. Total Organic Carbon
2 #2 I. Tier c. Inf. Total Organic Carbon
3 #4 SBR Effluent Total Organic Carbon
/14 mg/L 01/09/90 I
/400 mg/L 01/09/90
/120 mg/L 01/09/90
4 ts o. Tier T. Eff. Total Organic Carbon
5 #6 I. Tier T. Eff. Total organic Carbon
6 #7 Outer Eff. Total organic Carbon
-6.4 mg/L 01/09/90 I
, 120 mg/L 01/09/90
4.2 mg/L 01/09/90
7 #8 Inner Eff. Total Organic Carbon . 200 mg/L 01/09/90
I
Samples taken on 12/21/89. I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
!
i
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
rn
IEA Project#:
Client Name:
Sample t Client ID
IEA LABORATORY RESULTS
619-114
Hoechst Celanese Corporation
Parameter Results
Date
Analyzed
=============================================================================••••••••CJaa
1 u o. Tier c. Inf. Total Organic Carbon 17 mg/L / 01/09/90
2 #2 I. Tier c. Inf. Total Organic Carbon 880 mg/L/ 01/09/90
3 t4 SBR Effluent Total Organic Carbon 550 mg/L /, 01/09/90
#5 Tier T. Eff. Total organic Carbon 3.4 I I 01/09/90 4 o. mg L "
5 #6 I. Tier T. Eff. Total Organic Carbon 540 mg/L ✓ 01/09/90
6 t7 Outer Eff. Total organic Carbon 2.7 mg/L ✓ 01/09/90
7 #8 Inner Eff. Total organic Carbon 520 mg/L v 01/09/90
Samples taken on 12/28/89.
IEA LABORATORY RESULTS I
I
I
==~===~===~===~=-=~====•=•==-=::::::::=========•====•======•==-===~===---------~;;~==~-I
IEA Project t:
Client Name:
619-115
Hoechst Celanese corporation
l EE-58 (l/2) Total Organic Carbon
2 T-35 (l/2) Total Organic Carbon
3 CC-33 (1/3) Total Organic Carbon
4 K-28 (l/3) Total organic Carbon
5 Trip Blank (l/2) Total organic Carbon
l EE-58 (l/2) Total Organic Halide
2 T-35 (l/2) Total Organic Halide
3 CC-33 (l/3) Total organic Halide
4 K-28 (l/3) Total Organic Halide
3.2 mg/L 01/22/90 I 11 mg/L 01/22/90
10 mg/L 01/22/90
2000 mg/L 01/22/90 I 0.99 mg/L 01/22/90
<0.010 mg/L 01/09/90
0.094 mg/L 01/09/90 I 0.77 mg/L 01/09/90
0.082 mg/L 01/10/90
I
comments:
*Result confirmed by reanalysis I
Sampling dates: 01/02/90 and 01/03/90 I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Sample#
1
2
3
4
5
6
1
3
4
5
IEA Project#:
Client Name:
Client ID
#1 o Tier Inf
#5 0 Tier T Eff
#7 Outer Eff
V-23
FF-34
Trip Blank
U O Tier Inf
#7 Outer Eff
V-23
FF-34
IEA LABORATORY RESULTS
619-117
Hoechst Celanese Corporation
Parameter
Total Organic Carbon
Total Organic Carbon
Total Organic Carbon
Total organic Carbon
Total Organic Carbon
Total Organic Carbon
Total Organic Halide
Total Organic Halide
Total Organic Halide
Total organic Halide
Results
)
9.0 mg/L
' 4. 7 mg/L
5.2 mg/L
5400 mg/L
1.7 mg/L
0.49 mg/L
/ 0.021 mg/L
0.028 mg/L
0.17 mg/L
0.013 mg/L
Date
Analyzed
01/25/90
01/25/90
01/25/90
01/25/90
01/25/90
01/25/90
01/12/90
01/12/90
01/12/90
01/12/90
rn
IEA Project t:
Client Name,
1 t2 I. Tier c. Inf.
2 t4 SBR Eff.
3 t6 I. Tier T. Eff.
4 ta Inner Effluent
l t2 I. Tier c. Inf.
4 ta Inner Effluent
Samples collected on l/9/90.
IEA LABORATORY RESULTS
619-118
Hoechst Celanese Corporation
Total Organic Carbon J 2,200
Total Organic Carbon · 600
Total Organic Carbon
Total Organic Carbon
1550
/ 600
Total Organic Halide '0.076
Total organic Halide ,0.53
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
Date
I
I
I
I
01/25/90 I
01/25/90
01/25/90
01/25/90
01/16/90 I
01/16/90
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I·•-·,., • ,... .. . -,,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Sample I
l
2
3
4
5
6
7
IEA Project I:
Client Name:
Client ID
u o Tier T Inf
12 I Tier C Inf
i4 SBR Effluent
15 0 Tier T Eff
16 I Tier T Eff
#7 outer Effluent
#8 Inner Effluent
I Sampling date: 01/11/90
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
IEA LABORATORY RESULTS
619-119
Hoechst Celanese Corporation
Parameter
Total Organic Carbon
Total organic Carbon
Total organic Carbon
Total organic Carbon
Total organic Carbon
Total organic Carbon
Total organic Carbon
Results
12 mg/L
;510 mg/L
,270 mg/L
5. 0 mg/L
·/2so mg/L
2.5 mg/L
300 mg/L
Date
Analyzed
01/25/90
01/25/90
01/25/90
01/25/90
01/25/90
01/25/90
01/25/90
IEA LABORATORY RESULTS
IEA Project#: 619-120
Client Name: Hoechst Celanese Corporation
l o Tier Comb Inf Total Organic Carbon
2 I Tier Comb Inf Total Organic Carbon
3 14 SBR Effluent Total Organic Carbon
4 #5 0 Tier Tower Eff Total Organic Carbon
5 #6 I Tier Tower Eff Total Organic Carbon
6 #7 o Tier Eff Total Organic Carbon
7 #8 Tier Eff Total Organic Carbon
Sampling date: 01/18/90
5.8 mg/L
620 mg/L
59 mg/L
3.3 mg/L
73 mg/L
2.4 mg/L
78 mg/L
Date
02/06/90
02/06/90
02/06/90
02/06/90
02/06/90
02/06/90
02/06/90
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I --·--···---.
rn
IEA Project#:
Client Name:
Sample# Client ID
1 #1 o. Tier Comb. Inf.
2 #2 I. Tier comb. Inf.
3 #4 SBR Eff.
4 #5 o. Tier Tower Eff.
5 #6 I. Tier Tower Eff.
6 #7 o. Eff.
7 #8 I. Eff.
Sampling Date: 01/25/90
IEA LABORATORY RESULTS
619-121
Hoechst Celanese Corporation
Parameter Results
Total Organic Carbon 5.0 mg/L
Total organic carbon 1500 mg/L
Total organic Carbon 45 mg/L
Total organic Carbon 4.0 mg/L
Total organic Carbon 47 mg/L
Total organic carbon 1.7 mg/L
Total Organic Carbon 77 mg/L
Date
Analyzed
02/06/90
02/06/90
02/06/90
02/06/90
02/06/90
02/06/90
02/06/90
-'
I
I I
r CONDUCTIVITY : I BOD NH3N P04
I DATB I/MONTH ! pH I I/MONTH TSS l/WBEK 1/WEEK ' COD ' i FIRST WED. DAILY DAILY lot WED. DAILY WED. WED.
'
? 1 ~J '7,,., §°.t/3 3~ 960{) /4d 4.,1/3 ",7 /
I
2 . .S:5/ 5rtft> 30
3 h,51, 73''7. ,:-'-;J.
I 4 1~'5", ,h J-,/..7 di:, "Ji:, .
5 _=,; C" .. /_)AA "2-'2-
I 6 5'. '/],,., $t (!"() 2..J
7 5,3.5 1'1,i~ 9'/-
I 8 r.11 L 't 611 =2? °J, L {),.K'9
9 "',~ /.S-,do ~~
I 10 ~ 'ii /", actJ 4'8'
11 C:.S'/ Jt,. J"o 5'9 ,
I 12 5,S'I 9.Stn ~
13 l"'. 7S i-9d, d ,w
I 14 ' ... "C.,e. 1). ?/ ~ d -~ -
15 :::: .:1. ) 'lb,,. 7/ ) s-: f,A o. 'jc,
I I
16 [>, i;; 2-15~ I,, 3
17 ,::, l:"1-:2.IJ d (J 8'6
I 18 \.:::: J ) !e,,. I). I
19 ~¥6 ~ J.5
I 20 5.38 isso //
21 5:l-7 151/0 IS
I 22 5,U; /1/-IO () q I, J.J ,3 2-
23 5.68 /1/,6 ~o
I 24 ~U> 21,l/a II
25 ~'$ 211/0 07
I 26 s: ,l.'.1: JtU> os
I 27 (1.,/o I~~ oS ' I
f<e,seed1"1
I . $BR.
28 5:J/tt. l#A~ ~,;,I
29 AJ{)""-• I' ---• -
30 J,lo -• -------
' I
I
I
AVG. 11D ~ 6 S.3'1 i~'7 88 9f»o 35 Jt,, O,J./$
HIGH i("") d 1 q a~ ~I-(. lfo.1-13 o.? I
LOW !il.~o IL/So (J 1../ O( . J./o ().SO
MONTH .,...,....._ ·"'"IBAB O I
I iCONDUCTIVITY I pH COD 800 I TSS NH3N I P04 I
DATE I /MONTH
1
1 /WK. I/WK. I/WEEK It/MONTH I/MONTH ! I/MONTI! ,
1st. WED. 1 WED. WED. WED. 1st.WED. lot.WED. lat.WED.'.
I }33'J.... ?.7i ! ~'1,3 ~-io 1/,~/ ' 1~-~~ ! I '
2 !
' 3
4
5
6
7 .-
8 7. ~ ~ . 11 ~,, b 91/,t.1 .-9
10
11 .-
12
13 .-
14 .-.
15 7, I,,.,; 'l.7$e :;::>~~.t-1
' ( 16
17
18
19
20
21
7
22 1.1/~ "'I J..S"t> ? I/?/. 1-.j
23 I
24
25
26 I-27 !
28 I-29 #t) -~ . ---•
30 I-' -
i .. i
AVG. i /8?-')-7.~ ~ i3c,'7o i-Z1/.,R 1 ~.Jr, ! J./,(p/ ;
I-()""' -!
'
HIGH f-J. ') 9 ! '1'J-5°o 6, 1/?J, J.J i '
LOW I ?.l-/o i /m i ~<7.-Z i I-i : i
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1·
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
DATE
1
2 '
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
AVG.
HIGH
I LOW
CONDUCTIVITY
!/MONTH
FIRST WED.
57~
S?c;
INIIBR TIBR coMT!Nl!D 111nuHr D--ga MONTH ~-"-,;'-=-'--'"'TIIAR _I
BOD NRJN P04
f/11-111 r~L t ..,,. pH COD !/MONTH TSS 1 /WBBK !/WEEK
DAILY DAILY lat WBD. DAILY WED. WED. ~/!),ff
I,. .!./4 ,JJ_ .
1 J ., • /~ JI:"/ l'J ,D --t.. 'l.9 )'1t..t) 7 e},D
/...,di-9~ )d c.o
5:'I~ f&O :J ~.o
$,l.~ /3"6 7 ~.o
$.LI. IJ fO } ~/,10 ~-/, B7 . 2/ ~,D
_,,.. /'t J,,L,2_r1 L) ,. 'J..
5,u /jab {_t5 "·s
,,32-'1.0'fJ ll> "·3 15',SJ. 21"' /.S (),O
l5,9-, /7(0 8lJ o, I
h.AL "?91..,4 (JI I.')..
1i:::;:-4 ~ ~All 16 )),/,A • 2..0 O,o --f.7~ ~,'fD 3, 0 O,o
I~~ ~.It E, ftt 0,0
.<J<./. LAAtJ ~~d O,o
I 11 -, ,,... -"l, -z_ ~ d ~ ('), 0 . .
J ..... , ... ) ,"VC'cl )I. ",/
s.e:;o 3,te ,~ c>. I
>, ~f/-I 2.1,,0 /0 f2.' I,>' ,1,.$" 0,0
5,(2 3..$~0 2.-'-~.o
5.ftS ~/~ &I (),O
s:13 82$0 SD t,, tJ
r.,.s ,s~ 30 () • 0
r:,1 1/f"o L7 ~.1)
~hi ~,:)..Et, e:;-f' ~.{)
s.•o 11~~ t3 I 9. o" /. <1! D.o
S'.'i'/-JJ,f~-70 0,6
~.SI /~ 2,~o S-2. 0. I
,~'1'? .....,,, ...... ,.i::-8 ti, ")_
i t.L "l./ '1-('" -µ,r 0,~
5.81 1/J./o~ /3~t!D 3? 7. '1. 9 o.s;;... -ri .li'r
t.ifo I/. c;t>O ~I J'J,o o I .J/8 I.')_
a./1 0/~ o3 /,ii t) ,,c; O,D
CONDUCTIVITY
DATE !/MONTH
lat. WID.
l
2
3
4
5
6 Jl.'2-'l
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
I AVG. i / 'J.d-7 ' i
I H!GB
i
LOW
INNER -l!ER_j;UlBON_ TILTER IHLIIENT D -~.., I MoKU -~1.,,r""~'---· Yue0 7 -•
pH COD BOD
1/WK. 1/WK. !/WIii
WBD. WED. WBD.
17 .. /1 ...• J Jt'71.o
7, 19 ~J() 3/J./, '7.
7,'ft_ lf-25 /:;.'}, J
7. 81 I,']~ ?.'d-S.o
-
1, "'" 'f '+ {) -::,/,33.J
?.51 '!13 5'~'1, C,
?.9,-~M) I/., '13, o
?. I'). 4¢5 I 'J-7, I
TSS NB3N
1/MONTB 1/MONTB
lat.WBD. lat.WBD.
:2,../ 7 /,J~
~/7 /,~LI .
.
P04 I 1/MOWTH ,
lat.WED.!
'
'I, 17
-
9,/7
i
' ' ' ' ' l
i
' I
I
' "
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I'
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I •
' ' '
i
'
i
'
i
!
' I
I
' I
i i : !
I
I I
.J_
' CONDUCTIVITY ! BOD N83N l~~:BK I R~ii/:,1/./,. [DATE I/MONTH pH COD I /MONTH TSS 1/WBU
! FIRST WBD. DAILY DAILY lot WBD. DAILY WBD. WED. ! ;r::.,,ci,16/PA-
' I s-.a, '/-97$ 39 ~.o
I
2 . /,,2,,,J> L0~0 'I \ "·" 3 N6 $ --~.,,
I 4 ~)~ ·'"'"" ,l "·., ~
_I -5 N~ ' ~ j (J,j
I 6 N" .s.;-, -(J), I
7 N6.s11 -d ~,L
I 8 Nt; s--,,_
''"" 9 ·»J\ . f!"'-, II' ~.'l>
I 10 'i~i J 5',1'/-I ftJ" I C:()o s 2.. $'" .iS" ~~
11 ~.IP 87~6 45 k <I
I 12 15,77 I C1 110• '/'.-? 4, C,
13 .:-;J''7. );2.. ?l'r'I; ,L} 4 6,~
I 14 l.rr.-, 2. ...... --J~ -/t}, 7\ -
15 $'. 7.J t.~ 32. t),O
I ( 16 s.'IC /75t:J t, ~ '" 17 '·'" /71JO .2..IJeJ 3,i/D . ¥' tJ1/
I 18 .. r:;;4~ -"IA>.&. .,, '11 "I I ~ ~ . I 19 ,~, ?1 I I>. t) ,t,.C:
I -.. 20 .>,(,I z_z.fd tJ ' n.a
21 .s',t'I /f~O .I () ",0
I 22 S', flt z_7(J'D ~ l'),0
23 C-fjt 1!.'144 / (j,0
I 24 •t,. h I/A~ II /'7,Q .1'1. 711. ...... , ~, I. I
25 .f.7/ t.J t}'d J!, o.t
I 26 S',t'I /2.,J'I! t.72. (),0
27 I i::;-;n JI,,,,..... o.w, ~, I
I 28 t:; l .._
• /d~?.,,~ '216 0,0
· rs.70 .
0,3 29 '", g'/t() /o'f
I (
30 5,~z, 1/2-5 55 0,0
31 :(1,~ ~..lC .... )'7 !. Id , 7'} t),0
I AVG. g1~ €".io 55io IS'oo ?4 I I. 9 I),' 5 n, 1.3
I
HIGH ~>J ,. 'd-0 11. 15'o ,. ? ';-33.8 ~.35 I • I
LOW ~Z1 ,_.c;, J./' \7,,-fl o5 i.s o,i../t /). ()
' CONDUCTIVITY pH COD BOD TSS NB3N P04
DATE l/MONTB 1/WK. 1/WK. l/WKEK I/MONTH 1/MONTB 1/M~TH
1st. WBD. ' WED, WBO. WBD. 1st.WED. 1st.WED. lot.WED.
( l
2
3 ,Jo.$.__,.
4
5
6
7
8
9 / .-
10 17~).-7.~ J5a~ 1, 6? /9':L //,i'I ,a.z.o
11 .-
12 !
13 .-;
14
15 .-
( 16
17 '7,o'/ 75'" SIi
18
19
20
21
22
23
24 NA vH/>f J J .JJ t-25 7. 3l.. ~ $'() I 'J.t/3
26 f-27
28 I-29
30 1,/1 7dA .. I-'-If--resr'
( 1ltJS11/..1i NO 31
. : ,J AVG. / 7 5',),,, ?.t,(o Cfoo * /J ]-J/,JJ Jo, 'J.o I-'
' HIGH /7 s-~ 8,/7, I S'Ot7 -it .,
LOW )7 s'~ ?,l)D 69o If-, l-,
-------
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
. I i pH ' ' I DATE ! DAI LY
I
I '), 51 I
2 ·7,7/
3 1,9,.
4 1.1.r
5 '1. '11
6 7, t/ (,,
7 '7. <l-8
8 7.~~
9 1-~6
10 1..5'
11 1.JI
12 '7,!>7
I 13 ' 7,//.
14 L.9 /
15 77/
16 '7. C1.-
17 7 -?"
18
'l,' ' 19 751
20 f/,0()
2.r' 8.2-1-
22 'j,O/
23 f.5/
24 8.JS
25 f. /$"
26 ,.23
27 8·lf 9
28 9 /. 1 ,
29 ,.53
30 8,97
AVG. . ?. JI,,
HIGH 3.9?
LOW fu. ~ I
... "··--· •-·
' NITROGEN I DAiLY DAILY I 1/WBEK
MLSS ! MLVSS I AMMONIA I D 0
! WBD. DAILY
~J.{3 ~/'7 "J ' 16 ,3"i J, ti .
.z.2-~C J 7. (..~ $."
'/~~~ /?,,f' /I !,~
"'7o9/A /'i/i>A 'if. l,
.,~,, 1.. J '1. ,., I qq
2.2..oi //, 0 '?.I
18'5'2.. / 2, 0 t."I
)f?, JLdg) ., I ~ .r
08'7'~ ;,J.,t ~7
/$/JO .3, 0 g, s-
/'?S,6 :2., 2.i 8,'f
~~6 /, 9' f.'f
I ___ ;
7 A°'!-' ' 2... ~ 9. '7_
I/th ~ .,?'J" 9, '1
JLS,,., /.:;'~l) ~--t.y i1. c.L
!7U o. <I~ g,(,
./ p .,,,, (JI b;i, ;:;.r
}'Jt.1. ),"?J' 9,S"
•Jq~ ;., • fl Q 9,V
/3U> 2. ,3 i 9.,
I b8'1 ;.?o ;,7
I9-J't-I ,a'I 3, 2.K !,If
117-i--:z... a 'I ;,,9
/(# 1.., Ii,._ g,, 9
/fpJ-/,93 f.'J
//,if8 I. "' 3,9
/2./pe, 0. "J"j 'J. :J-
)72:? If'.< CJ./
/8'3& 15 ''I-o. 9 9 $·5
;1,ao /, /0 f?,f
1337 )J[8 . C:, J./ 4 1.9
I~ LLu.9. d--19~. I g,ftO ~-9
o8Lfo I 5d0 [ o.L/J,/ ~.ti
' '
SBR oFFLUEiNT (DECA~'f)
i COO 1 BOD 5
DATE I DAILY ! !/WEEK
! ! WED.
II '-/-75'0
-+----+---<---+----1-------+-----1
I 12 $"0/t() I i
13 ~6 ' ' ' ' 14 b3ti6
15 5'(,(71) t:::7 '-# J,. Jj
' 16 _r::,Z.. t, b
17 .// 1 I!, b
~-------+-----+----l----1----------J
18 5".1~
19 JJt.~
20 IJ./5,o
21 7/~o ---+---------+-------l-----+------1
22 14'~ t'.::>f,3.],J
23 l.<~C'1>
~~--4-----1---+-----1
24 3S:J.O
25 Jolf o "'-----1----l--_j___-----1-_____.._----1
26 l:z2.,o
27 ~7M>
28 2..fS°OD
29 --Nos,,, --1.
30 -J,/~ .S> ,,1.
: AVG. i 1-k ;1./-z, j.31./,6 i
!HIGH (. 7.IJt) !""-B.?., '
LOW 1 q c;-olm1 __
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
(
(
D ATB
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
AVG.
HIGH
LOW
SBJiJFFLU!illT-.+cECAllT,
COD BOD 5
DAILY I /WEEK
WED.
/t, 6-:l I ~iJ o.o
/L ,.,,.
;t:,,,,>,,
gz..o
~cft;
Lj,StJ ,~t)
J/6 >.
No :; u
{VO s~ -~
•
)JOS ~
•
.Jz,$
? .;/4
!, 'fCJ i9./
131~
7/J
f:;l)t,
Jl.7,.r '
,5:1.r
s~o !
'
~~" I 9C::o
5JtJ
S7,r:;-
~(r(J
t/o s-_/1.
g;o
9,1,1
J~{)b; >~,c.1
'2..f) 1./-0
'2.~Jlt)
[,',\ l).
1-,,. l\,,o
o/S J../J}.'J-
l~Ot,0 /ooo, o
-z "l r:; {q_ I
MONTH ....,~c;_ YBAR ~ .
! I pB I MLSS ! MLVSS AMMONIA D. 0. I
0 DATE I DAILY I DAILY : 1/WKEK · NITROGEN DAI LY
' WKD. DAILY ' '
l J' XY j :i'h~ . l d t. ~
2 . ~.I.I I 1t.J.
,
/,.' 9 • tV-
3 ;, .ct J ,?:,I; I, I 6 7,t-
4 ,, !ff 2..2:j, I, 'I I 'f.'7
5 8, I 1..-2'/' 6 /,o~ '/4 9
6 ~.2../ L2.tJO Jq(JI/, 6.78 7,S
7 !,79 z.:I t,c, (J,(!I,, !. ,.
8 >lo S""--._.. -~
9 g. ,)() /,lOO ,1./8 7,/
10 1.'lo /1,11-C • Z.lJ ¥,$ I
11 8.BI/ 2.1<13 /,tJ 2-?,'i
12 ,.., 7' ' ~t>tJ2" :2.' J. ,;-: 7,.< ,,
13 I~ . '1 Ci 1->.C1.-·JflD . /, t/7 %, !J
14 &'. 3 0
-2-2-,µJ ,u· g,'f
15 P, u d?/' .,,_ J-4 t.2-
16 7, 1~ -"//,'}I.. _"?. I 2 6":: I
17 5'. 91 .\ '] CJ 4. '?. "UL 7,9
18 !,!.J ' ".2 ~d J' ~ //p ;?.~
19 S',80 ;9~ j,f() e,o
20 8', 'lD 25f2.-2,./(. 0 2.,15" 7.1
21 ~.7S uwO • 96 7, 1'
22 1 .q (; ~" 2..8 S,2-CJ 7,7 I 23 ,.s, 2.!1"' !:1. ()~ 1.0
24 8,7° Z5'" J. 7f ,.,
25 f.~o 2,D'f-0 .2. .-z..' 1•/
26 f,99 ~9,A. ~-,P'""t, 7~/ I 27 [f ,t/'I -z.ll-Sz.. 2.012-$, "$ ~-5
28 g -~'1 2..7U s. ()~ f,/
29 8 ,7 / 2.Jfd1 (,,1/l/ ?. 0
30 g,t); '2,'( /. ,1 t., t>,., ,f',Li I
8', r/ D < 31 ±1. t, l:, 2. f6 ?.2-
AVG. ;l,L~i~~? ~"I/ 1130 ?.S '.
HIGH 8. ~er ~'7R8 ~{ (,-0 Ci,t,/tf 9.?
LOW ?.':..7 1,t1o JJJp f) • ;)..O 5,( I
I ·----; S1>11-UFLU.BNT (DECANT)
MONTH
COD I BOD 5
I (
OATH DAILY i I/WEEK
WED.
i
l 31-'~
I 2 ·-a.stn
3 N~ s, f..f,L~ -
I 4 # q --("A-, ... ,,,/_,. -
5 /1/D -' L<-
I ~
6 /\IP , . t,..._
7 1\/ 6 i..--. • -
I 8 /iOIJ
9 /~11
I 10 JOSO I It. 7
11 850
I 12 S4"D
13 °'.?'J.C..-
I 14 ~~
15 l.f-/ ~
I ( 16 tJo~ . l...e.
17 :53-S ? '1.3
I 18 Ci tJ b
19 e;-,ij?
I 20 S'S"tJ
21 5"1J
I 22 L.1}6
23 -~~
I 24 ¼ .f..4 V)?r1/.e__
25 1/-f"d 7 ?t.tl
I 26 L/-Z.O '
27 _,j t::, A
I 28 --~-,;-
29 1,/(J s•--4 ~
I J
( -~ -resr
{<o.r .. 1-'li,
30 t,(){)
31 ? 'J.,.< *
I N•T ,., AVG. ✓fqi +
BIGB 3500 *
I LOW 37S ii"
MONTH --ifa.--. Ylht11~ .
I pH I MLSS MLVSS AMMONIA D.O.
DATE I DAILY : DAILY I/WEEK NITROGBN DAILY I WBD. DAILY
I i',75 2.Z.lf6 2. .io '?,I
2 (j,'fZ.,, 2-f7'/J,,-1.12-'1,9
3 9,il z.JtJ? 2.. '-I-Ii-~ i,c::s 7.f
4 tf,J'/ 11_-,:;-J/, .<, tLA ~d
5 3.$~ 2. ttz.K ..t,.2.8 7,7 Nif: ,JN/Jd7'1--...St1~=.J.,
6 g,J,$ LZ.7t ¥' t-d~ S".o
7 g.'4-~ ?, '/f'f ~, t.J.o ~ ,CJ
8 5'.(,..o _:,(J 12-/2.,76 'f,'
9 t,I/ ~-c:;>?,.. }1,ttJ -,"1. :t_
10 g,Jo z..qtl/./ z.t./U 12.,'/() ~.3
11 8,Z.S' ?/fl.f /4,. ~ "'/-,2-
12 9. 5:i.. //2.0 /J.c t,a
13 ..?'..9?-/,MJ. Jd. ,41 .s, JJ
14 /,' ) J.:ii&
.
'7-~ ~.:.r: Ji:j
15 g,77 ~'"" 1../,~ 1,,,5
( 16 f?,&f._. ~~~ 4/.S. 3 t.. l--
17 g,77 JZ.88' z.71/2-Z.8 ,3 ~,7
18 f',f~ 1,?,i,1 :;1_9, ,t. A ~--d
19 ?,J/r:;, z~i'/J.. '1/. 0 q 7./
20 8. qz_ .J~/,2. ~9, '9,1 t.2-
21 ;,q-z_ '35~ 2.S.. 80 S:J>
22 S', 9J 2...l,df JZ.,/0 7. z._
23 I, ,;9 l'.1 P+4 3d,/'t 7, i'
24 t, 3') l-1J";/o t.3'!~ j_tJ., :J.-C 'c;'. s
25 !s",1&' 307(. t.N·. J 6 (.,3
26 f.t./-t:/ 2.~t./6 LI,.. 1 b 7,'/
27 I. s:::-~7~ .:2.:1, d4 f. ::2. ~ '
28 f rl.,.. '7 ~~ )'"'1.,/J( I,,
29 ?,J/ 3.S-9{. z_z.. s 0 ~-0
30 i,9tf 3/CA 2./, ~o S . .J
( 31 J; r-1 1/ 7';-. J-J. It. /1,r& r,,. ~
AVG. J. ~ 9 '§.9~ '-53o/ I 'J. 73 In, t
RIGH ~. '19 ~) aa,; ~?9~ J./5.3 0 ~.';l....
LOW 3.';}-5 ,OUO d-37~ °j,,?J If,!)'.
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
5050H190
APPENDIX II
INNER TIER
INFLUENT/EFFLUENT CLP WATER QUALITY
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Client Sarrple I.0.#:
IEA Assigned EPA#:
Date SSIJ1)le red:
SM1Jle Matrix:
Contract No.: 68-~8-0045
Date Reported:
TARGET COMPOONDS/ANALYTES
VOA TARGETED COMPOONDS (uq/L)
Methylene Chloride
Acetone
Carbon Disulfide
1,2-Dichloroethene (total)
2-Butanone
Trichloroethene
Benzene
2-Hexanone
Chlorobenzene
B/N TARGETED COMPOONDS (uq/L)
Benzyl Alcohol
Di-n·butylphthalate
ACID EXTRACTABLE COMPOUNDS (ug/l)
Phenol
2·Chlorophenol
4-Methylphenol
Benzoic Acid
PESTICIDES (ug/L)
Aldrin
PCBs (ug/l)
(none detected)
METALS (ug/l)
Al uni nun
Antimony
Arsenic
Bariun
Caciniun
Calciun
Chromiun
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
Lead
Magnesiun
Manganese
Nickel
Potassiun
Silver
Sodiun
Thalliun
Vanadiun
Zinc
TCL, TAL and TIC COMPOONDS/ANALYTES
DETECTED IN INFLUENT/EFFLUENT SAMPLES
HC/SHELBY, N.C.
WESTINGHOOSE PROJECT: 4124·85-050D
#2: IMer
Tier Cont>.
Influent
HCS073
10/09/89
WATER
(not run)
(not run)
(not run)
(not run)
(not run)
(run for
Cr only)
29.0
#8: IMer
Tier
Effluent
HCSD75
10/09/89
WATER
(not run)
(not run)
(not run)
(not run)
(not run)
(run for
Cr only)
#2: !Mer
Tier Conti.
Influent
HC084
11/3/89
WATER
11/22/89
550 B
10 J
31
(not run)
(not run)
(not run)
(not run)
(run for
Cr only)
41.1
#8: Imer
Tier
Effluent
HC086
11/3/89
WATER
11/22/89
680 B
(not run)
(not run)
(not run)
(not run)
( run for
Cr only)
Revised 2/1/90
I
TCL, TAL and TIC COMPOUNOS/ANALYTES I
DETECTED IN INFLUENT/EFFLUENT SAMPLES
HC/SHELBY, N.C. I WESTINGHOUSE PROJECT: 4124-85-0500
#2: IMer #8: IMer #2: Inner #8: Inner
Tier Conb. Tier Tier Conb. Tier I Client Sa!!l!:le 1.0.#: Influent Effluent Influent Effluent
IEA Assigned EPA#: HCS073 HCS075 HC084 HC086
Date s~le red: 10/09/89 10/09/89 11/3/89 11/3/89
S~le Matrix: WATER WATER WATER WATER I Contract No.: 68-W8-0045
Date Reported: 11/22/89 11/22/89
TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS I
VOA NON-TARGETED COMPOUNDS ~ug[q
Substituted Formic Acid (not run) (not run) I Ethanol
2-Methyl·Propanol 60 J
Butenal 100 J
Unknown
2-Propyl Furen 500 J I Unknown Acetic Acid Ester
Unknown Butanoic Acid Ester
n·Butyl Acetate
Unknown
Substituted Formic Acid I Substituted Acetic Acid
Tetrahydro-Furan
Substituted Propane
Substituted Butanoic Acid I Unknown
Unknown
Tri methyl Si lanol
Substituted Formic Acid
Ethanol (ACN) I Methyl Ester Acetic Acid
Substituted Propane
Substituted Butanoic Acid
Substituted Butanoic Acid I Substituted Butanoic Acid
Unknown
Substituted Formic Acid
Substituted Propane
Substituted Butanoic Acid I Substituted Acetic Acid
Unknown
Ethenyl Ester Formic Acid 100 J Unknown Hydrocarbon 400 J I 1-Chloro-2-Methyl Propane 500 J
Ethyl Ester Butanoic Acid 30 J
Acetic Acid Butyl Ester 20 J
1-Hexanol 30 J
Unknown Hydrocarbon 400 J I Unknown 50 J
Butanol 100 J
Unknown 60
2-Methyl Propanoic Acid 300
Pentanoic Acid 500 I Unknown Alcohol
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown I BNA NON-TARGETED COMPOUNDS {u9LL}
Butanoic Acid (not run) (not run) (not run) (not run)
3-Methyl Butanoic Acid I
Revised 2/1/90 I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Client SalTl)le J.O.#:
IEA Assigned EPA#:
Date saq,le red:
S8111)le Matrix:
Contract No.: 68-WS-0045
Date Reported:
1,4-Butanediol
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Substituted Benzyl Alcohol
Phenyl-Propanedioic Acid
Unknown
Benzenepropanoic Acid
Ethyl-Benzoic Acid
Unknown
2-Methylpropyl Benzoic Acid
Unknown
Unknown Aromatic
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown Hydrocarbon
Substituted Cyclohexane
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown Hydrocarbon
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown Alkane
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
• Except metals received 08/18/89
TCL, TAL and TIC COMPOUNDS/ANALYTES
DETECTED IN INFLUENT/EFFLUENT SAMPLES
HC/SHELBY, N.C.
WESTINGHOUSE PROJECT: 4124·85·050D
#2: Imer
Tier Coob.
Influent
HCS073
10/09/89
WATER
#8: lmer
Tier
Effluent
HCS075
10/09/89
WATER
#2: Jmer
Tier Cont,.
Influent
HC084
11/3/89
WATER
11/22/89
#8: Inner
Tier
Effluent
HC086
11/3/89
WATER
11/22/89
Revised 2/1/90
Client Sarrple I.0.#:
IEA Assigned EPA#:
Date sarrple red:
S8fT1)le Matrix:
Contract No.: 68-US-0045
Date Reported:
TARGET COMPOUNOS/ANALYTES
VOA TARGETED COMPOUNDS Cug/L)
Methylene Chloride
Acetone
Carbon Disulfide
1,2-Dichloroethene (total)
2-Butanone
Trichloroethene
Benzene
2-Hexanone
Chlorobenzene
8/N TARGETED COMPOONOS (ug/l)
Benzyl Alcohol
Di-n-butylphthalate
ACID EXTRACTABLE COMPOUNDS (ug/L)
Phenol
2-Chlorophenol
4-Methylphenol
Benzoic Acid
PESTICIDES Cug/L)
Aldrin
PCBs (ug/L)
(none detected)
METALS (ug/l)
Aluninun
Antimony
Arsenic
Bariun
Caalliun
Calciun
Chromiun
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
Lead
Magnesiun
Manganese
Nickel
Pot ass i un
Silver
Sodi1.1n
Thall iun
Vanadiun
Zinc
TCL, TAL and TIC COMPOUNDS/ANALYTES
DETECTED IN INFLUENT/EFFLUENT SAMPLES
HC/SHELBY, N.C.
WESTINGHOUSE PROJECT: 4124-85-DSOD
#8: Inner
Tier
Effluent
HCS111
12/08/89
WATER
(not run)
(not run)
(not'run)
(not run)
(not run)
(run for
Cr only)
#2: Inner
Tier Coob.
Influent
HCS122
1/10/89
WATER
(not run)
(not run)
(not run)
(not run)
(not run)
(run for
Cr only)
#8: Inner
Tier
Effluent
HCS123
1/10/89
WATER
(not run)
(not run)
(not run)
(not run)
(not run)
(run for
Cr only)
Revised 2/1/90
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Client Sanple r.o.#:
IEA Assigned EPA#:
Date S&ffl)le red:
Sarrple Matrix:
Contract No.: 68-W8·0045
Date Reported:
TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS
VOA NON-TARGETED COMPOUNDS (ug/L)
Substituted Formic Acid
Ethanol
2-Methyl-Propanol
Butanal
Unknown
2-Propyl Furan
Unknown Acetic Acid Ester
Unknown Butanoic Acid Ester
n-Butyl Acetate
Unknown
Substituted Formic Acid
Substituted Acetic Acid
Tetrahydro-Furan
Substituted Propane
Substituted Butanoic Acid
Unknown
Unknown
Trimethyl Silanol
Substituted Formic Acid
Ethanol (ACN)
Methyl Ester Acetic Acid
Substituted Propane
Substituted Butanoic Acid
Substituted Butanoic Acid
Substituted Butanoic Acid
Unknown
Substituted Formic Acid
Substituted Propane
Substituted Butanoic Acid
Substituted Acetic Acid
Unknown
Ethenyl Ester Formic Acid
Unknown Hydrocarbon
1-Chloro-2-Methyl Propane
Ethyl Ester Butanoic Acid
Acetic Acid Butyl Ester
1-Hexanol
Unknown Hydrocarbon
Unknown
Butanol
Unknown
2-Methyl Propanoic Acid
Pentanoic Acid
Unknown Alcohol
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
BNA NON-TARGETED COMPOUNDS (ug/L)
Butanoi c Acid
3-Methyl Butanoic Acid
TCL, TAL and TIC COMPOUNDS/ANALYTES
DETECTED IN INFLUENT/EFFLUENT SAMPLES
HC/SHELBY, N, C.
~ESTINGHOUSE PROJECT: 4124·85-0SDD
#8: Inner
Tier
Effluent
HCS111
12/DB/89
WATER
(not run)
(not run)
#2: Inner
Tier Conb.
Influent
HCS122
1/1D/89
WATER
(not run)
( not run)
#8: Inner
Tier
Effluent
HCS123
1/1D/89
WATER
(not run)
(not run)
Revised 2/1/90
Client Sarrple J .D,#:
JEA Assigned EPA#:
Date sar11Jle red:
S~le Matrix:
Contract No.: 68-W8-0045
Date Reported:
1,4-Butanediol
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Substituted Benzyl Alcohol
Phenyl-Propanedioic Acid
Unknown
Benzenepropanoic Acid
Ethyl-Benzoic Acid
Unknown
2-Methylpropyl Benzoic Acid
Unknown
Unknown Aromatic
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown Hydrocarbon
Substituted Cyclohexane
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown Hydrocarbon
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown Alkane
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
* Except metals received 08/18/89
TCL, TAL and TIC COMPOUNDS/ANALYTES
DETECTED IN INFLUENT/EFFLUENT SAMPLES
Ht/SHELBY I N.C.
WESTINGHOUSE PROJECT: 4124-85-0SDD
#8: lmer
Tier
Effluent
HCS111
12/08/89
WATER
#2: Inner
Tier Cori>.
Influent
HCS122
1/10/89
WATER
#8: Inner
Tier
Effluent
HCS123
1/10/89
WATER
Revised 2/1/90
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
ENVIROFORMS/CLP 788
1
SAMPLE NO.
INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
I Lab Name: IEA. INC.
HCS073
Contract:
I Lab Code: IEA Case No.: SAS No.: SDG No.: HCS068
Matrix (soil/water): WATER
I Level (low/med):
% Solids:
LOW
0.0
Lab Sample ID: 619-74-6
Date Received: 10/09/89
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg dry weight): UG/L
I ' :cAS No.
I I I I I I t I
: Analyte :concentration:c: Q :M
I I I I I
------' --------------I -I---'_ I :7429-90-5
:7440-36-0
:7440-38-2
:7440-39-3
:7440-41-7
:7440-43-9
:7440-70-2
:7440-47-3
:7440-48-4
:7440-50-8
:7439-89-6
:7439-92-1
:7439-95-4
'7439-96-5
7439-97-6
7440-02-0
7440-09-7
7782-49-2
7440-22-4
7440-23-5
7440-28-0
7440-62-2
7440-66-6
:Aluminum :_: :NR:
:Antimony :_: :_N_R:
:Arsenic :_ :NR:
:Barium :_ :_N_R:
:Beryllium :_ :NR:
:cadmium :_ :NR
:calcium ' :NR
:chromium 29.0 ~
:cobalt NR
:copper NR
:Iron NR
:Lead NR
:Magnesium _: ____ N_R:
:Manganese _: ___ :NR:
:Mercury _: ___ :NR:
:Nickel _: ___ :_N_R:
:Potassium _: ___ :NR:
:selenium _: ___ :N_R:
:silver :NR:
:sodium :NR:
:Thallium :NR:
:vanadium :_N_R:
: Zinc : NR: ______ :cyanide :NR:
:olor Before: YELLOW Clarity Before: CLOUDY
Clarity After: CLEAR
Texture:
J1or After: YELLOW Artifacts:
I FORM I -IN
l 008
7/88
ENVIROFORMS/CLP 788
1
INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
Contract:
SAMPLE NO.
HCS075 Lab Name: IEA, INC.
Lab Code: IEA Case No.: SAS No. : SDG No. : HCS068
Matrix (soil/water): WATER Lab Sample ID: 619-74-8
Date Received: 10/09/89 Level (low/med): LOW
% Solids: 0.0
Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg dry weight): UG/L
I I
iCAS No.
:7429-90-5
:7440-36-0
7440-38-2
7440-39-3
7440-41-7
7440-43-9
7440-70-2
7440-47-3
7440-48-4
7440-50-8
:7439-89-6
l7439-92-1
l7439-95-4
:7439-96-5
:7439-97-6
:7440-02-0
:7440-09-7
:7782-49-2
i7440-22-4
:7440-23-5
:7440-28-0
:7440-62-2
:7440-66-6
:olor Before: YELLOW
:olor After: COLORLESS
:omments:
I I I I
I Analyte Concentration c: I
I I I _,
:Aluminum I _,
:Antimony I _,
:Arsenic
:Barium ,_
:Beryllium I ,_
:cadmium I ,_
:calcium I ,_
:chromium 5.4 : 11 :cobalt I ,_
:co1212er I ,_
: Iron I ,_
:Lead I ,_
:Magnesium I ,_
:Manganese I ,_
:Mercury I ,_
:Nickel I I ,_
:Potassium I ,_
:selenium I ,_
:silver I ,_
:sodium I ,_
:Thallium I ,_
:vanadium I ,_,
: Zinc I I ,_,
:cyanide I I ,_,
Clarity Before: CLOUDY
Clarity After: CLEAR
I I
I I
Q :M I
' I _,
NR' _,
NR' _,
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
,L
NR
NR,
NRl
NRl
NR:
NR' _,
NR' _,
NR:
NR:
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
:NR
:NR
Texture:
Artifacts:
I
I
I
I
I
I
11
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
FORM I -IN t o i o 7 /88 I
I
I
lA EPA SAMPLE NO.
VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
Lab Name: IEA Contract: 68-WS-0045 HC084
ILab Code: IEA Case No.: 619-85 SAS No.: SDG No. : HC080
Lab Sample ID: ,1atrix: (soil/water) WATER
lsample wt/vol: 5.000
.Level: (low/med) LOW
(g/mL) ML Lab File ID: 1115313
Date Received: 11/ 9/89
l l '¥:, 1 ~ "J.I • 1
Date Analyzed: Hl/15/89 % Moisture: not dee. 100.
lcolumn: (pack/cap) CAP Dilution Factor: 5.00
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
CAS NO. COMPOUND
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
(ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L
7~-87-3-------Chloromethane
74-83-9-------Bromomethane --------75 - 0 l - 4 - - - - - - -Vinyl Chloride ______ _
75-00-3-------Chloroethane _______ _
75-09-2-------Methylene Chloride ____ _
67-64-1-------Acetone
75-15-0-------Carbon Disulfide ------75-35-4-------1,l-Dichloroethene ____ _
75-34-3-------l,l-Dichloroethane~----,--
540-59-0-------l,2-Dichloroethene (total)
67-66-3-------Chloroform ·---------107-06-2-------l,2-Dichloroethane ____ _
78-93-3-------2-Butanone ~--~-----7 l -55 - 6 - - - - - - -l, l, l -Tri ch lo roe thane ---56-23~5-------Carbon Tetrachloride ____ l
108-05-4-------Vinyl Acetate I
75-27-4-------3romodichloromethane I
78-87-5-------i,2-Dichloropropane I
110061-01-5-------cis-l,3-Dichloropropene __ I
79-01-6-------Trichloroethene I
124-48-1-------Dibromochloromethane I
79-00-5-------1,1,2-Trichloroethane I
: 71-43-2-------Benzene I
110061-02-6-------trans-l,3-Dichloropropene I
I 75-25-2-------Bromoform I
I 108-10-1-------4-Methyl-2-Pentanone I
I 591-78-6-------2-Hexanone I
I 127-18-4-------Tetrachloroethene I
I 79-34-5-------1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane I
1· 108-88-3-------Toluene I
i 108-90-7-------Chlorobenzene I
100-41-4-------Ethylbenzene I
100-42-5-------Styrene _________ _
1330-20-7-------Xylene (total) ______ _
50. iU
50. ! U
50. t U
50. \U
25. [U
550. I B
10. I J
25. IU
25. :u
25. IU
25. IU
2 5. I u
50. [U
25. :U
25. :u
so. l u =s. IU
25. ! u
25. I U
25. I u
25. [U
25. I u
1 ' ,.,J .J... • :
25. I u
25. jU
50. IU
so. : u
25. IU
25. [U
25. I u
25. I u
25. [U
25. i U
25. iU
Q
I
I
I
I
I -
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I,
I
I
I
I
I
FORM I VOA J 046 1/87 Rev.
lE EPA SAMPLE NO.
\'OLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS
HC084
Lab Name: IEA Contract: 68-W8-0045
Lab Code: IEA Case No.: 619-85 SAS No.:
,•latrix: (soil/water) WATL'<.
Sample we/vol: 5.000 (g/mL) ML
Level: (low/med) LOW
SDG No. : HC080
Lab Sample ID:
Lab file ID: 1115313
Date Received: 11/ 9/89
Date Analyzed: l&"/15/89 % Moisture: not dee. 100.
Column: (pack/cap) CAP Dilution Factor: 5.00
Number TICs found: 9
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
(ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L
CAS tHJMBER COMPOUND NAME RT EST. CONC. i=============---1
1. 692-45-5\Ethenyl Ester Formic Acid I 2.28
-I UNKNOWN H':{DROCARBON ____ \ 5 . 7 3
J. 78-84-2\2-Methyl Propanol \; 8.67
-,
4. 123-72-8\Butanal \,-10.42
5. 513-36-011-Chloro-2-methyl Propane \ 13.48
6. 4229-91-8 \ 2-Propyl Fur an I,-14. 97
7. 105-54-4\Ethyl Ester Butanoic Acid I 18.98
8. 123-86-4\Acetic Acid Butyl Ester I 19.62
9. 111-27-3\l-Hexanol I 22.65
100.
400.
60.
100.
500.
500.
3 0.
20.
30.
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
Q
l O. ______ I I _____________ _
11. I l _____________ _
12. I I _____________ _
LJ. I _____________ _
14. I______________ J
I 15. __________________________________ !
' 16. I
17. !
l 8. I
19. I
20. ! 21. _____ _
:2. -------------------------------" ---23. _____ _
24. _____ _
25. ______ ------------------_______ , __ _
26. -------------------------------"---?.7. _____ _
28. ----------------------------------
29. ------------------------------~ ---
30. ------------------------_______ 1 ---
FORM I VOA-TIC 1/87 Rev.
3 047
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
ENVIROFORMS/CLP 788
1
INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
Contract:
SAMPLE NO.
HCS084 Lab Name: IEA, INC.
Lab Code: IEA case No.:
Matrix (soil/water): WATER
Level (low/med): LOW
SAS No.: SDG No. : HCS080
Lab Sample ID: 619-86-5
Date Received: 11/03/89
% Solids: 0.0
Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg dry weight): UG/L
I I I I I I I I I I I I lCAS No. I Analyte 'Concentration:c: Q M I I I I I I I I I I ,_, _,
l7429-90-5 lAluminum I I NR' ,_, _,
l7440-36-o lAntimony I I NR' ,_, _, l7440-38-2 'Arsenic I NR' ,_ _,
l7440-39-3 Barium lNRl l7440-41-7 Beryllium :NR: '7440-43-9 Cadmium lNR 7440-70-2 Calcium 'NR ,_
7440-47-3 Chromium 41.1 'P ,_ 7440-48-4 Cobalt lNR 7440-50-8 Copper I lNR ,_
7439-89-6 Iron I 'NR ,_ ,_ 7439-92-1 Lead I lNR 7439-95-4 Magnesium lNR 7439-96-5 Manganese lNR, 7439-97-6 ,Mercury _, 'NR' ,_, l7440-02-0 Nickel NR' _, '7440-09-7 Potassium NR 7782-49-2 Selenium NR 7440-22-4 Silver NR 7440-23-5 Sodium NR 7440-28-0 Thallium NR 7440-62-2 Vanadium NR 7440-66-6 Zinc NR Cyanide NR
Color Before: BROWN Clarity Before: CLOUDY Texture:
Color After: YELLOW Clarity After: CLEAR Artifacts:
Comments:
CLIENT ID=# 2 INNER TIER COMB. INFLUENT
. 1 007
FORM I -IN 7/88
1.; EPA SAMPLE NO.
'!OLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
HC086 Lab Name: IEA Contract: 68-WB-0045
Lab Code: IEA Case No.: 619-85 SAS No.: SDG No.: HC080
Matrix: (soil/water) WATER
Sample wt/vol: 5.000
Level: (low/med) LOW
(g/mL) ML
Lab Sample ID:
Lab File ID: 1115304
Date Received: 11/ 3/89
\\ l ,~ .. ,~,
Date Analyzed: M/15/89 % Moisture: not dee. 100.
Column: (pack/cap) CAP Dilution Factor: 4.00
CAS NO. COMPOUND
,4-87-3-------Chloromethane
74-83-9-------Bromomethane
75-01-4-------Vinyl Chloride
75-00-3-------Chloroethanc
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
(ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L
I
I
I
I
I 75-09-2-------Methylene Chloride I
40.
40.
40.
40.
20.
67-64-1-------Acetone I 680.
75-15-0-------Carbon Disulfide I 20.
75-35-4-------1,1-Dichloroethene ! 20.
75-34-3-------1,l-Dichloroethane I 20.
S40-59-0-------l,2-Dichloroethcne (total) I 20.
67-66-3-------Chloroform I 20.
107-06-2-------1,2-Dichloroethane I 20. 78-93-3-------2-Butanone I 40.
71-55-6-------1,l,l-Trichloroethane I 20.
56-23-5-------Carbon Tetrachloride I 20.
108-05-4-------Vinyl Acetate I 40.
75-27-4-------Bromodichloromethane I 20. 78-87-5-------1,2-Dichloropropane I 20.
\10061-01-5-------cis-l,3-Dichloropropene I 20.
I 79-01-6-------Trichloroethene I 20.
124-48-1-------Dibromochloromethane I 20.
79-00-5-------1,1,2-Trichloroethane I 20.
i 71-43-2-------Benzene I 20.
[10061-02-6-------crans-i,3-Dichloropropene I 20.
! 75-25-2-------Bromoform I 20.
! 108-10-1-------4-Methyl-2-Pentanone I 40.
I 591-78-6-------2-Hexanone .1 40.
127-18-4-------Tetrachloroethene 20.
79-34-5-------1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 20.
108-88-3-------Toluene 20.
188-90-7-------Chlorobenzene 20.
100-41-4-------Ethylbenzene 20.
100-42-5-------Styrene 20.
1330-20-7-------Xylene (total) 20.
FORNI VOA
Q
i
IU I
!U I
IU I
\U I
\U I
IB I
[U I
[U I [U I
IU I
IU I
\U I
[U I
iU I
IU I
IU I
iU I [U I
\U I
IU I
[U I
\U
\U
IU
IU
IU
\U
IU
IU
[U
IU
iU
IU
\U
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
lE EPA SAMPLE NO.
'iOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS
HC086
Lab Name: IEA Contract: 68-W8-0045
lab Cude: IEA Case No.: 619-85 SAS No.:
Matri;,: (soil/water) WATER
lamp le •<Jt/vol: 5. 000 (g/rnL) ML
level: (low/med) LOW
SDG No. : HC080
Lab Sample ID:
Lab File ID: 1115304
Date Received: 11/ 3/89
ii BI-,-,,~,
Date Analyzed: iir/15/89 ~ Moisture: not dee. 100.
tolurnn: (pack/cap) CAP Dilution Factor: 4.00
I Number TICs found: 6
, I
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
(ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L
I
I CAS NUMBER I ,:ot•lPOUND NAME 2T EST. CONC. I Q i~===============1
i c . - -I UNKNOWN HYDROCARBON
Ii " L •
J.
4.
I 5.
1: 6.
7.
8.
1: 9.
10.
I 11.
I 12.
- I UNKNOWN _________ _
71-16-3\Butanol _________ _
- -\UNKNOWN
79-31-212-Methyl Propanoic Acid
109-S2-4\Pentanoic Acid. ______ _ ______ I ____________ _
______ I ____________ _
______ I ____________ _
______ I ____________ _
______ I ____________ _
______ I _____________ _
!========1===========1=====1
5.63 400. I J
13.45 50. I J
' 14.9] 100. I J I
I 18.10 60. I J
I 20.82 300. I J
I 21. 98 500. I J
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I Ii l3. ______ I _____________ _ I 14.
15.
Ii 10.
17.
18.
' 19. Ii 20 .
. , 1
' L ~ •
Ii ; ~ ~~.
23.
24.
I 25.
1: 26.
27.
I 28.
1: 29.
30.
I
I FORM I VOA-TIC 1/87 tl.ev.
I 3 074
ENVIROFORMS/CLP 788
l
INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
Contract:
2a..J'ii...,:...._ = -'
SAMPLE NO.
HCS086
I
I I I
I ii Lab Name: IEA, INC.
Lab Code: IEA Case No.: SAS No.: SDG No. : HCS080
Matrix (soil/water): WATER Lab Sample ID: 619-86-7
Level (low/med): LOW
% Solids: 0.0
Concentration
I I
iCAS No.
I
I
'7429-90-5
7440-36-0
7440-38-2
7440-39-3
7440-41-7
7440-43-9
7440-70-2
7440-47-3
7440-48-4
7440-50-8
7439-89-6
,7439-92-1
17439-95-4
17439-96-5
17439-97-6
:7440-02-0
17440-09-7
17782-49-2
17440-22-4
:1440-23-5
17440-28-0
17440-62-2
17440-66-6
Color Before: COLORLESS
Color After: COLORLESS
Comments:
Date Received: 11/03/89
Units (ug/L or mg/kg dry weight):
I I I I I I I Analyte :concentration:c I
I I I ,_
iAluminum I ,_
iAntimony I ,_
:Arsenic I ,_
:Barium I ,_
I Beryllium
:cadmium
:calcium
:chromium 4.1 .Q
:cobalt
:coeeer
:Iron I ,_
iLead I ,_
I Magnesium I ,_
I Manganese I I ,_
:Mercury I ,_
'Nickel I ,_
Potassium I ,_
Selenium I ,_
Silver I ,_,
Sodium I I ,_,
Thallium I I ,_,
Vanadium I I ,_,
,Zinc I I ,_,
:cyanide I I ,_,
Clarity Before: CLEAR
Clarity After: CLEAR
Q
UG/L
I I I I
iM I I
I I ,_,
INRI
INRI
INRI
INRI
'NR' ,_,
'NR' ,_,
JNR: :~:
iNR
iNR
'NR ,_
INR
INR
iNR
iNR
:NR
:NR
:NR
INR
'NR ,_
INR
'NR ,_
INR
iNR
Texture:
Artifacts:
CLIENT ID=# 8 INNER EFFLUENT
FORM I -IN 1 009
I
I
I
I I
I
I
I'
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
ENVIROFORMS/CLP 788
l
INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
Contract:
SAMPLE NO.
HCSlll lab Name: IEA, INC.
' ab Code: I EA
latrix (soil/water.):
Case No.
WATER
SAS No. SDG No.: HCS103
Lab Sample ID: 619-103-9
fevel (low/med): LOW Date Received: 12/08/89
-:5 Solids: 0.0
I Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg dry weight): UG/L
' ' I ' ' :cAs No. Analyte :cancencration:c: Q :M
' ' ' ' ,_, ,_,
I
:7429-00-5 ; .:=-,luminum ,_, 1 NR' ,_,
:7440-36-0 ;Antimonv ,_, :NR;
: 7440-·33-,.., ; tirsenic ' ' 1 NR 1 ,_, ,_,
: 7440-39-:, ; Barium ;_i :NR;
I :7440--11-7 :ser:z'.llium ;NR;
:7440-43-9 ;cadmium ' :NR; ,_,
:7440-70-2 :calcium ' 1 NR 1 ,_, ,_,
I :7440-47-3 :chromium 4.1 1 U 1 N 'p ' ,_, ,_,
:7440-48-4 ;cobalt ' ' :NR: ,_,
: 7440-5,)-3 :coQger ,_, ; ~-JP. :
:7439-89-6 ; !r·on ,_, 1 NR 1 ,_,
I :7439-0"'-l :Lead ;_1 'NR' ,_,
:7439-05-4 :Magnesium ;_, 1 NR 1 ,_,
:7439-06-S :Manganese '_, :NR:
I : 74.39-0 7-6 ;Mercurv ,_, 'NR' ,_,
: 7440-0::-r:-• :.•Hckel ' ' 1 NR 1 ,_, ,_,
:7440-09-"" :aotassium ,_, ;NR;
I
;778'2-<lq_,.., ;selenium ;_1 : NP.;
:7440-2::-4 ;~ilver ' ' :NR; I_,
:7440-23-5 ;sodium ' :NR; ,_,
:7440-:23-0 ;Thallium ' ' :NR; ,_,
I :7440-62-'l :vanadium ,_, :NR:
:7440-66-6 ; Zinc ' ' :NR; ,_,
:cvanide ' ' :NR; ,_,
I
I
Jlor· Before: 1_T.BROWN Clarity Before: CLOUDY Texture:
liar ()fter: COLORLESS Clarity After: CLEAR Artifacts:
-~menrs: I CLIENT ID= =8 INNER EFFLUENT ' 1 010
I FORM I -HI
ENVIROFORMS/CLP 788
1
INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
Contract:
SAMPLE NO.
HCS122
Lab Name: IEA, INC.
Lab Code: IEA Case No.: SAS No.: SDG No.: HCS113
Matrix (soil/water): WATER
Level (low/med):
% Solids:
LOW
0.0
Lab Sample ID: 619-116-10
Date Received: 01/10/90
Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg dry weight): UG/L
I I I I I I :cAS No. : Analyte Concentration C Q lM
I I I I , _____ , _____ -------___ ,_,
:7429-90-5 :Aluminum
'7440 36-0 Antimony
7440-38-2 Arsenic
7440 39-3 Barium
7440-41-7 Beryllium
7440-43-9 cadmium
7440-10-2 calcium
7440-47-3 Chromium
7440-48-4 Cobalt
7440-50 a ,Copper
___ :NR:
___ :NR
___ lNR
___ lNR
_______ : -___ : NR
_______ : - : .tIB.
-------' : NR 4,1 Q l.P.... _, ___ :NR
_: llIB
7439-89-6 :4r&r~o~n'----______ _ _: l!IB.
7439-92-1 :~L~esa~d'----______ _ _ : HR
:7439-95-4 Magnesium _: HR
:7439-96-5 Manganese _: NR
:7439-97-6 Mercury _: NB.
:7440-02-0 Nickel _: NR
:7440-09-7 Potassium .tIB.
l7782 49 2 selenium
l7440-22-4 :silver
:7440-23-5 :sodium
_______ ,_ ---HR
1IB
!IB. l NR: l7440 28 o :Thallium
:7440-62-2 :vanadium
:7440-66-6 :~z~i~n~c'----______ _ _____ :cyanide
___ NRl
NRl
NRl
ilor Before: COLORLESS
:olor After: LT.YELLOW
Clarity Before: CLEAR
Clarity After: CLEAR
Texture:
Artifacts:
,mments:
CLIENT ID= #2 INNER TIER COMB. INFLUENT
FORM I -IN 7/88
1 010
I
I
I I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Lab Name: IEA, INC.
I Lab Code: IEA
ENVIROFORMS/CLP 788
1
INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
Contract:
Case No.: SAS No.:
SAMPLE NO.
HCS123
.Matrix (soil/water):
Level (low/med):
WATER
LOW
0.0
SDG No.: HCS113
Lab Sample ID: 619-1~6-11
Date Received: 01/10/90
I% Solids:
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg dry weight): UG/L
I I I I I I
lCAS No. : Analyte Concentration:c Q M
I I I , _____ , ____________ ,_ ---
l 7429-90-5 !Aluminum : ____ NR
l7440-36-o !Antimony : ____ HR
l7440-38-2 !Arsenic : ____ HR
l7440-39-3 !Barium :_: ___ NR
l7440-41 7 !Beryllium :_: ___ NR
l7440-43-9 :cadmium :_: ,NR
7440-70-2 :calcium :_: l!IB.
7440-47-3 :chromium 4.1 :~: L
7440-48-4 :cobalt :_: HR
7440-50-8 :copper :_: NR
7439-89-6 Iron :_: NR
7439-92-1 Lead :_: NR
7439-95 4 Magnesium :_: NR
7439-96-5 Manganese :_: ,NR
7439-97-6 Mercury :_: lNR
7440-02-0 Nickel :_ l!IB.,
7440-09-7 Potassium :_ lNRl
'7782-49-2 Selenium :_ lNRl
7440-22-4 Silver :_ lNRl
7440-23-5 Sodium :_ l!IB.l
7440-28-0 lThallium :_ l!IB.l
7440-62-2 :vanadium :_ l!IB.l
7440-66 6 :zinc :_ :NR: _____ :cyanide :_ l!IB.l
IJlor Before: LT.BROWN Clarity Before: CLOUDY Texture:
:olor After: COLORLESS Clarity After: CLEAR Artifacts:
IJmments:
CLIENT ID= #8 INNER EFFLUENT r
I
I FORM I -IN 7/88
1 011
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
5050H190
APPENDIX III
SBR/FILTER PRESS SLUDGE ANALYSES
I
I TCL, TAL and TIC COMPOUNDS/ANALYTES
DETECTED IN SLUDGE SAMPLES
HC/SHELBY, N.C.
I WESTINGHOUSE PROJECT: 4124-85·0500
SBR WASTE FILTER PRESS FILTER PRESS SBR WASTE
Sludge 1.0.: SLUDGE SLUDGE SLUDGE §1!l!fil
I COITITlents: CLP Lab CLP Lab CLP Lab non-CLP Lab
IEA Assigned EPA#: HC078 HC079 HC079(TCLP) HCS100
Date salll)le red: 10/19/89 10/19/89 10/19/89 11/10/89
Sarrple Matrix: WATER WATER WATER WATER
I Contract No. : 68·W8·0045
Date Reported: 10-11/89 10-11/89 11/89
TARGET COMPOUNDS/ANALYTES
I VOA TARGETED COMPOUNDS ( ug/L)
Methylene Chloride 6 (not run)
Acetone 60 B 530 B 160 B
I Chloroform
2-Butanone 78 21
BLN TARGETED COMPOUNDS ( ug/L) I Phenol 20 7 J (not run)
2-Chlorophenol
4-Methylphenol 14
bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate 3000
I Benzoic Acid 40 J
Di-n-butylphthalate
ACID EXTRACTABLE COMPCNJNDS (ug/L)
(none detected} (not run)
I PESTICIDES (uq/Ll
(none detected) (not run)
I PCBs (ug/L)
(none detected) (not run)
I METALS (ug/L)
Alunim.1TI 12400 6010 20500
Antimony 24.4 B 3.4 BN 69.1 N
I Arsenic 8.4 BN 6.6 B 8.4 BN
Bariun 640 576 2870 1750 N
Beryl l iun 2.2 B 1 .9 B 2.3 B 2.5 BN
Cadmi LIT1 19.6
Calciun 28500 6330 37400 40700 I Chromiun 328 109 * 93.6 N 551
Cobalt 211 2210 3810 539 N
Copper 193 61.3 331 N
Iron 18700 310000 274 67400
I Lead 47.8 28.0 64. 1
Magnesiun 38600 1870 B 11900 47100
Manganese 58900 64400 269000 201000 E
Mercury 0.74 N
Nick.el 71.9 630 1120 206 N I PotassiLITI 7880 4150 B 9580
Seleniun
Silver 8.6 BN 39. 7 N 32.2 N
Sodiun 362000 2130 BE 1360000 459000
I Thalliun
Vanadiun
Zinc 781 3790 3420 4270
-----------
I
Cyanide
I Revised 2/1/90
Sludge 1.0.:
Cooments:
IEA Assigned EPA#:
Date sarfl)le red:
Sa~le Matrix:
Contract No.: 68-~8-0045
Date Reported:
TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS
VOA NON-TARGETED COMPOUNDS (ug/L)
Substituted Cyclohexane
(1-Methylethyl) Cyclohexane
Unknown Cycloalkane
Unknown
3-Methyl Nonane
Unknown Hydrocarbon
Substituted Cyclohexane
Unknown
Ethenyl Ester Formic Acid
Unknown
Unknown Alcohol
Unknown
Unknown
BNA NON-TARGETED COMPOUNDS (ug/L)
Unknown Acid
Unknown
Unknown Acid
Hexanoic Acid (DOT)
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Benzeneacetic Acid
Unknown Acid
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Substituted Indole
Unknown
Hexadecanoic Acid
Unknown
Unknown Alcohol
Unknown
Substituted Cyclohexane
Unknown Acid
Unknown
Unknown Alcohol
Unknown Alkane
Unknown
Unknown Alkane
Unknown
Unknown Acid
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown Aldehyde
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
TCL, TAL and TIC COMPOUNDS/ANALYTES
DETECTED IN SLUDGE SAMPLES
HC/SHELBY, N.C.
UESTINGHOUSE PROJECT: 4124·85·050D
SBR UASTE
SLUDGE
CLP Lab
HC078
10/19/89
UATER
10·11/89
100 J
100 J
100 J
100 J
40 J
200 J
300 J
70 J
70 J
200 J
30 J
200 J
50 J
100 J
500 J
40 J
500 J
400 J
200 J
100
FILTER PRESS
SLUDGE
CLP Lab
HC079
10/19/89
UATER
10·11/89
50 J
50 J
50 J
200 J
40 J
80 J
200 J
80 J
10000 J
6000 J
6000 J
9000 J
10000 J
2000 J
2000 J
1000 J
2000 J
2000 J
2000 J
1000 J
8000 J
20000 J
30000 J
9000 J
10000 J
10000 J
FILTER PRESS
SLUDGE
CLP Lab
HC079CTCLP)
10/19/89
UATER
11/89
100 J
SBR UASTE
SLUDGE
non-CLP Lab
HCS100
11/10/89
UATER
(not run}
(not run}
Revised 2/1/90
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I '
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Sludge 1.0.:
Cooments:
JEA Assigned EPA#:
Date s~le red:
Sarrple Matrix:
Contract Mo.: 68-~8-0045
Date Reported:
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown Acid
Unknown Acid
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Crotonic Acid (DOT)
Unknown Acid
Unknown
Butyrolactone
Unknown
Unknown Acid
Unknown
2,2'-oxybis-Ethanol
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown Acid
Ethyl Benzoic Acid
Unknown
2,3-dione 1H-lndole
Unknown
3-carboxaldehyde 1H-Indole
Unknown Acid
lsocrotonic Acid
Pentanoic Acid
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown Acid
Unknown Aromatic
Unknown Acid
Unknown
Oodecanoic Acid
Tetradecanoic Acid
Unknown Acid
Unknown
Unknown Acid
Octadecanoic Acid
TCL, TAL and TIC COMPCXJNOS/ANALYTES
DETECTED IN SLUDGE SAMPLES
HC/SHELBY, N. C.
WESTINGHCXJSE PROJECT: 4124-85-0500
SBR WASTE f I LTER PRESS
SLUDGE SLUDGE
CLP Lab CLP Lab
HC078 HC079
10/19/89 10/19/89
WATER WATER
10-11/89 10-11/89
20000 J
70000 J
FILTER PRESS
SLUDGE
CLP Lab
HC079( TCLP)
10/19/89
WATER
11/89
10 J
9 J
10 J
9 J
80 J
10 J
10 J
SBR WASTE
SLUDGE iion-cIP Lab
HCS100
11/10/89
WATER
Revised 2/1/90
Sludge 1.0.:
Cooments:
IEA Assigned EPA#:
Date sa~le red:
Sa~le Matrix:
Contract No.: 68·W8·0045
Date Reported:
TARGET COMPOUNDS/ANALYTES
VOA TARGETED COMPOUNDS (ug/L)
Methylene Chloride
Acetone
Chloroform
2·Butanone
8/N TARGETED COMPOUNDS (ug/l)
Phenol
2·Chlorophenol
4·Methylphenol
bis(2·Ethylhexyl)phthalate
Benzoic Acid
Di·n·bt.Jtylphthalate
ACID EXTRACTABLE COMPOUNDS (ug/L)
(none detected)
PESTICIDES (ug/l)
(none detected)
PCBs (ug/L)
(none detected)
METALS (ug/L)
Alumim.m
Antimony
Arsenic
Sariun
Beryllium
Cadmium
Calcium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Manganese
Mercury
Nick.el
Potassium
Selenium
Silver
Sodium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Cyanide
I
TCL, TAL and TIC COMPOUNDS/ANALYTES I DETECTED IN SLUDGE SAMPLES
HC/SHELBY, N.C.
UESTINGHOUSE PROJECT: 4124·85-D5DD I SBR UASTE SBR WASTE SBR WASTE
SLUDGE SLUDGE SLUDGE
non·CLP Lab CLP Lab CLP Lab I HC102 HC112 HC113
11/10/89 12/08/89 12/08/89
UATER UATER UATER
11-12/89 12/89-1/90 12/17/89 I
I
3100 E 6600
8 I 90
(not run) I 160 D
1900 D 29 J I 9 J
(not run)
I
(not run)
I (not run)
(not run) 28300 (not run) I
6.4 BNU I 2410
2. 1 B
5.7
48300
371 N I 832 N
1030
51700
101 NS* I 50600
239000 E
0.54 N
273
11100 I 2.4 B
42.8 N
238000
5150 I
15.0
I
Revised 2/1/90 I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Sludge I.D.:
Coornents:
IEA Assigned EPA#:
Date sa~le red:
Sarrple Matrix:
Contract No.: 68-~8-0045
Date Reported:
TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS
VOA NON-TARGETED COMPOUNDS (ug/L)
Substituted Cyclohexane
(1-Methylethyl) Cyclohexane
Unknown Cycloalkane
Unknown
3-Methyl Nonane
Unknown Hydrocarbon
Substituted Cyclohexane
Unknown
Ethenyl Ester Formic Acid
Unknown
Unknown Alcohol
Unknown
Unknown
BNA NON-TARGETED COMPOUNDS (ug/L)
Unknown Acid
Unknown
Unknown Acid
Hexanoic Acid (DOT)
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Benzeneacetic Acid
Unknown Acid
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Substituted Indole
Unknown
Hexadecanoic Acid
Unknown
Unknown Alcohol
Unknown
Substituted Cyclohexane
Unknown Acid
Unknown
Unknown Alcohol
Unknown Al kane
Unknown
Unknown Al kane
Unknown
Unknown Acid
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown Aldehyde
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
TCL, TAL and TIC COMPOUNDS/ANALYTES
DETECTED IN SLUDGE SAMPLES
HC/SHELBY, N. C.
WESTINGHOUSE PROJECT: 4124-85·050D
SBR WASTE
SLUDGE
non-CLP Lab
HC102
11/10/89
WATER
11-12/89
40 J
80 J
20 J
30 J
10 J
SBR WASTE
SLUDGE
CLP Lab
HC112
12/08/89
WATER
12/89-1/90
200 J
90 J
SBR WASTE
SLUDGE
CLP Lab
HC113
12/08/89
WATER
12/17/89
(not run}
Revised 2/1/90
Sludge 1.0.:
Coornents:
!EA Assigned EPA#:
Date sample red:
Sarrple Matrix:
Contract No.: 68-~8-0045
Date Reported:
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown Acid
Unknown Acid
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Crotonic Acid (DOT)
Unknown Acid
Unknown
BLityrolactone
Unknown
Unknown Acid
Unknown
2,2'-oxybis-Ethanol
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown Acid
Ethyl Benzoic Acid
Unknown
2,3-dione 1H-Indole
Unknown
3-carboxaldehyde 1H-Indole
Unknown Acid
Isocrotonic Acid
Pentanoic Acid
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown Acid
Unknown Aromatic
Unknown Acid
Unknown
Dodecanoic Acid
Tetradecanoic Acid
Unknown Acid
Unknown
Unknown Acid
Octadecanoic Acid
TCL, TAL and TIC COMPOONDS/ANALYTES
DETECTED IN SLUDGE SAMPLES
HC/SHELBY, N.C.
~ESTINGHOOSE PROJECT: 4124-85-0500
SBR ~ASTE SBR WASTE SBR WASTE
SLUDGE SLUDGE SLUDGE
non·CLP Lab CLP Lab CLP Lab
HC102 HC112 HC113
11/10/89 12/08/89 12/08/89
~ATER WATER WATER
11-12/89 12/89-1/90 12/17/89
5000 J
500 J
500 J
1000 J
100 J
2000 J
700 J
2000 J
2000 J
200 J
400 J
200 J
200 J
100 J
2000 J
900 J
300 J
100 J 60 J
200 J
700 J 700 J
500 J
600 J
500 J
30 J
600 J
40 J
90 J
90 J
200 J
100 J
90 J
80 J
30 J
200 J
300 J
200 J
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Revised 2/1/90 I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
IEA Project#:
Client Name:
Sample# Client ID
IEA LABORATORY RESULTS
619-077
Hoechst Celanese corporation
Parameter Results
Date
Analyzed
=============================================================================•==aaaaccccc
l SBR Wasted Sludge TCLP -Arsenic <0.50 mg/L 10/20/89
l SBR Wasted Sludge TCLP -Barium <10 mg/L 10/17/89
l SBR Wasted Sludge TCLP -Cadmium <0.10 mg/L 10/20/89
l SBR Wasted Sludge TCLP -Chromium <0.50 mg/L 10/20/89
l SBR Wasted Sludge TCLP -Mercury <0.0005 mg/L 10/16/89
l SBR Wasted Sludge TCLP -Lead <0.50 mg/L 10/20/89
l SBR Wasted Sludge TCLP -Selenium <0.10 mg/L 10/19/89
l SBR Wasted Sludge TCLP -Silver <0.50 mg/L 10/20/89
rn GC/MS PURGEABLES
SW-846 METHOD 8240
IEA Sample Number: 619-077-1
Sample Identification: SBR Wasted Sludge
10/22/89 Date Analyzed:
Number
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Compound
Acetone
Benzene
Bromodichloromethane
Bromoform
Bromomethane
2-Butanone
Carbon disulfide
Carbon tetrachloride
9 Chlorobenzene
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Dibromochloromethane
Chloroethane
2-Chloroethylvinyl ether
Chloroform
Chloromethane
1,1-Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloroethane
1,1-Dichloroethene
1,2-Dichloroethene (cis + trans)
1,2-Dichloropropane
cis-1,3-0ichloropropene
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
Ethylbenzene
2-Hexanone
Methylene chloride
4-Methyl-2-pentanone
Styrene
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
Tetrachloroethene
29 Toluene
30
31
32
33
34
35
l,l,1-Trichloroethane
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
Trichloroethene
Vinyl acetate
Vinyl chloride
Xylenes (total)
Comments:
BQL = Below Quantitation Limit
Zero Headspace Extraction
By: Porter
Quantitation
Limit
(ug/L)
100
5
5
5
10
100
5
5
5
5
10
10
5
10
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
50
5
50
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
50
10
5
Results
Concentration
(ug/L)
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I m
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
IEA Sample Number:
BASE/NEUTRAL/ACID EXTRACTABLES
SW-846 METHOD 8270
619-077-1
Sample Identification: SBR Wasted Sludge
10/16/89 Date lj:xtracted:
Date Analyzed: 10/31/89 By: Griffin
Quantitation
Number
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
Compound
Acenaphthene
Acenaphthylene
Anthracene
Benzoic acid
Benzo(a)anthracene
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene
Benzo(a)pyrene
Benzyl alcohol
bis(2-Chloroethoxy)methane
bis(2-Chloroethyl)ether
bis(2-Chloroisopropyl)ether
bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate
4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether
Benzyl butyl phthalate
4-Chloroaniline
2-Chloronaphthalene
4-Chloro-3-methylphenol
2-Chlorophenol
4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether
Chrysene
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
Dibenzofuran
Di-n-butylphthalate
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine
2,4-Dichlorophenol
Diethyl phthalate
2,4-Dimethylphe~ol
Dimethyl phthalate
4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol
2,4-Dinitrophenol
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
Di-n-octylphthalate
Fluoranthene
FORM 8270 (l) Rev. 050589
Limit
(ug/L)
20
20
20
100
20
20
20
20
20
40
20
20
20
20
20
20
40
20
40
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
40
20
20
20
20
100
100
20
20
20
20
Results
Concentration
(ug/L)
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
IEA Sample Number:
BASE/NEUTRAL/ACID EXTRACTABLES
SW-846 METHOD 8270
619-077-1
Sample Identification: SBR Wasted Sludge
10/16/89 Date Extracted:
Date ·Analyzed: 10/31/89 By: Griffin
Quantitation
Number Compound
40 Fluorene
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
so
51
52
Hexachlorobenzene
Hexachlorobutadiene
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
Hexachloroethane
Indeno(l,2,3-cd)pyrene
Isophorone
2-Methylnaphthalene
2-Methylphenol (o-cresol)
4-Methylphenol (p-cresol)
Naphthalene
2-Nitroaniline
3-Nitroaniline
53 4-Nitroaniline
54
55
56
57
SB
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
Comments:
BQL
Nitrobenzene
2-Nitrophenol
4-Nitrophenol
N-Nitroso-di-n-propylamine
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine
Pentachlorophenol
Phenanthrene
Phenol
Pyrene
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
Below Quantitation Limit
Limit
(ug/L)
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
100
100
100
20
20
100
20
20
100
20
20
20
20
20
20
Results
Concentration
(ug/L)
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
430
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
82
BQL
BQL
BQL
BQL
Quantitation elevated due to a smaller amount of sample extracted.
TCLP Extraction
FORM 8270 (2) Rev. 0505B9
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1"1
I
I·-;., ,
I . I
I~\
' '
1·11
I
I
1·1
I
1·
I
I
IJ
I IJ
I
IEA Sample Number:
Sample Identification:
Date Extracted:
Date Analyzed:
Number Compound
TCLP Herbicides:
1
2
Comments:
2,4-D
2,4,5-TP
TCLP HERBICIDES
619-077-1
SBR-Wasted Sludge
10/18/89
10/19/89 By:
Quantitation
Limit
(mg/L)
0.01
0.002
BQL = Below Quantitation Limit
FORM EP-H Rev. 050589
Hinshaw
Results
Concentration
(mg/L)
BQL
BQL
I
I
lA EPA SAMPLE NO.
VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
ib Name:
lib Code:
IEA
IEA Case No.: 619-80
itrix: (soil/water) WATER
lunple wt/vol: 5. 000 (g/mL) ML
HC078
Contract: 68-W8-0045
SAS No.: SDG No.: HC078
Lab Sample ID:
Lab File ID: 1029B07
Date Received: 10/19/89
Date Analyzed: 10/29/89
l?vel: (low/med) LOW
Moisture: not dee. 100.
l)lumn: (pack/cap) PACK Dilution Factor: 1.00
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
CAS NO. COMPOUND
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
(ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L
74-87-3-------CHLOROMETHANE
74-83-9-------BROMOMETHANE
75-01-4-------VINYL CHLORIDE I 75-00-3-------CHLOROETHANE I 75-09-2-------METHYLENE CHLORIDE I 67-64-1-------ACETONE I 75-.15-0-------CARBON DISULFIDE I 75-35-4-------1,1-DICHLOROETHENE I 75-34-3-------1,1-DICHLOROETHANE I 540-59-0-------1,2-DICHLOROETHENE (TOTAL) _I 67-66-3-------CHLOROFORM l 107-06-2-------1,2-DICHLOROETHANE I 78-93-3-------2-BUTANONE I 71-55-6-------1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE I 56-23-5-------CARBON TETRACHLORIDE I 108-05-4-------VINYL ACETATE I 75-27-4-------BROMODICHLOROMETHANE I 78-87-5-------1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE I 110061-01-5-------CIS-l,3-DICHLOROPROPENE __ I
I 79-01-6-------TRICHLOROETHENE I I 124-48-1-------DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE I I 79-00-5-------1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE I I 71-43-2-------BENZENE I \10061-02-6-------TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE _\
I 75-25-2-------BROMOFORM I I 108-10-1-------4-METHYL-2-PENTANONE I I 591-78-6-------2-HEXANONE
I 127-18-4-------TETRACHLOROETHENE I I 79-34-5-------1,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE _I
I 108-88-3-------TOLUENE I I 108-90-7-------CHLOROBENZENE I I 100-41-4-------ETHYLBENZENE I I 100-42-5-------STYRENE I I 1330-20-7-------XYLENE (TOTAL) I I I
FORM I VOA
10.
10.
10.
10.
5.
60.
5 .
5.
5.
5.
5.
5.
10.
5 .
5 .
10.
5 .
5.
5.
5.
5 .
5.
5.
5.
5.
10.
10.
5.
5.
5 .
5.
5.
5.
5.
I
IU
jU
IU
IU
IU
IB
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
jU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
\U
\U
\U
\U
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
Q
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I __ \
1 nt R 1 /R7 OoH
lE EPA SAMPLE NO.
VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS
HC078
Contract: 68-WS-0045 ab Name: IEA
ab Code: IEA Case No.: 619-80 SAS No.: SDG No.: HC078
Lab Sample ID: atrix: (soil/water) WATER
ample wt/vol: 5.000
evel: (low/med) LOW
Moisture: not dee. 100.
olumn: (pack/cap) PACK
Number TICS found: 0
I
(g/mL) ML Lab File ID: 1029B07
Date Received: 10/19/89
Date Analyzed: 10/29/89
Dilution Factor:
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
(ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L
1.00
CAS NUMBER I COMPOUND NAME RT EST. CONC. Q
= ======!============= ==== ======= === l. ______ l _________________________ _
2. I __________________________ _
3. ______ I _______________________ --
4. 1------------~----------~---5. 1 _____________ ,1 ____ , _____ -.1 __ _
6. I _____________ I ___ ~------'---· 7. I ! ___ _, _____ _, __
8. I l ____ i ______ , __
9. I I ____ , _____ _. __
10. I J ____ , --------11. I ! ___ _, ______ , ___ ,
12. I I ____ 1 _____ _, __ _,
13. I I ___ __. ______ , __ _,
14. I I ___ -! _____ _, __
15. I I ____ , ________ _,
16. I I ___ --1 ------: __
17. 1-------------'----______ _, ---18. ! _____________ ----______ _, __ _
19 • I _____________ , ----l _______ _
20. I ____________ ~ ___ _, ______ , --
21. I ____________ _, ____ , _____ _, ---
22. I ____________ -' ___ _, _____ _, __ _,
23. I _____________ ----______ _, __ _,
24. ] _____________ ----! _____ _, __ _,
25. I ________________ _, _____ _, ---
26. I _________________ , ------__ _,
27. I _____________ !----,---------
28. '-------------' ____ , _____ _, __ _, 29. I ____________ _,----_____ _i __ _,
30. I ________________ _, ---------________ I _____________ ----' --------
FORM I VOA-TIC 1/87 Rev.
1 019
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
••
I
I 1B
SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
EPA SAMPLE NO.
I ab
HC078
Name: IEA Contract: 68-W8-0045
I ab Code: IEA Case No.: 619-80 SAS No.: SDG No.: HC078
atrix: (soil/water) WATER Lab Sample ID:
I ample wt/vol: 500.0 (g/mL) ML Lab File ID: 1121409
Date Received: 10/19/89 evel: (low/med) LOW
I Moisture: not dee. 100. dee. __ _ Date Extracted: 10/23/89
Date Analyzed: 11/21/89 I xtraction: (SepF/Cont/Sonc) CONT
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
PC Cleanup: (Y/N) N pH:
CAS NO. COMPOUND
6.0 Dilution Factor: 1.00
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
(ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L Q
I I I I I 108-95-2-------Phenol . .,,..,..-,---....,..,.--,,...,......~---I 20. I I
I lll-44-4-------bis(2-Chloroethyl)ether I 10. IU I I 95-57-8-------2-Chlorophenol. _______ l 10. IU I
I 541-73-1-------1,3-Dichlorobenzene ____ I 10. IU I
I 106-46-7-------1,4-Dichlorobenzene ____ I 10. IU I
I 100-51-6-------Benzyl alcohol _______ ! 10. IU I
I 95-50-1-------1,2-Dichlorobenzene ____ I 10. IU I
I 95-48-7-------2-Methylphenol __ -.~~--I 10. IU I
I 108--60-1-------bis ( 2-Chloroisopropyl) ether I 10. I U I
I 106-44-5-------4-Methylphenol _______ l 14. I I
I 621-64-7-------N-Nitroso-di-n-propylamine I 10. IU I
I 67-72-1-------Hexachloroethane _____ --=I 10. IU I
I 98-95-3-------Nitrobenzene ________ l 10. IU I
I 78-59-1-------Isophorone_-,--_______ I 10. IU I
I 88-75-5-------2-Nitrophenol _______ I 10. IU I
I 105-67-9-------2,4-Dimethylphenol _____ l 10. IU I
I GS-85-0-------Benzoic acid_:---:---.---1 50. IU I
I lll-91-l-------bis(2-Chloroethoxy)methane I 10. IU I
I 120-83-2-------2,4-Dichlorophenol _____ l 10. IU I
I 120-82-1-------1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene ___ l 10. IU I
I 91-20-3-------Naphthalene -,--------1 10. IU I I 106-47-8-------4-Chloroaniline ______ ! 10. IU I
I 87-68-3-------Hexachlorobutadiene --=---I 10. IU I
I 59-50-7-------4-Chloro-3-methylphenol I 10. I u I
I 91-57-6-------2-Methylnaphthalene ..,..,. ___ I 10. IU I
I 77-47-4-------Hexachlorocyclopentadiene I 10. IU I
I 88-06-2-------2,4,6-Trichlorophenol ___ I 10. IU I
I 95-95-4-------2,4,5-Trichlorophenol ___ I 50. \U I
I 91-58-7-------2-Chloronaphthalene ____ I 10. \U I
I 88-74-4-------2-Nitroaniline-,-______ I 50. IU I
I 131-11-3-------Dimethylphthalate _____ I 10. IU I
208-96-8-------Acenaphthylene _______ l 10. \U I
606-20-2-------2,6-Dinitrotoluene _____ l 10. IU I _____________________________ ! ___ !
FORM I SV-1 ,., (I':' f\ 1/87 Rev.
lC EPA SAMPLE NO.
SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
HC078
Contract: 68-W8-0045 ab Name: IEA
ab Code: IEA Case No.: 619-80 SAS No.: SDG No.: HC078
Lab Sample ID: .atrix: { soil/water l WATER
ample wt/vol: 500.0 {g/mL) ML
evel: {low/med) LOW
Moisture: not dee. 100. dee. __
xtraction: {SepF/Cont/Sonc) CONT
PC Cleanup: { Y /N l N pH: 6. 0
CAS NO. COMPOUND
Lab File ID: 1121409
Date Received: 10/19/89
Date Extracted: 10/23/89
Date Analyzed: 11/21/89
Dilution Factor:
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
{ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L
1.00
Q
I I I I I 99-09-2-------3-Nitroaniline _______ l 50. IU I
I 83-32-9-------Acenaphthene ________ l 10. IU I
I 51-28-5-------2,4-Dinitrophenol _____ I 50. IU I
I 100-02-7-------4~Nitrophenol _______ I 50. IU I
I 132-64-9-------Dibenzofuran. ________ l 10. IU I
I 121-14-2-------2,4-Dinitrotoluene _____ l 10. IU I
I 84-66-2-------Diethylphthalate ______ l 10. IU I
I 7005-72-3-------4-Chlorophenyl-phenylether I 10. IU I
I 86-73-7-------Fluorene _________ ~-I 10. IU I
I 100-01-6-------4-Nitroaniline _______ l 50. IU I
I 534-52-1-------4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol_l 50. IU I
I 86-30-6-------N-Nitrosodiphenylamine {ll I 10. IU I
I 101-55-3-------4-Bromophenyl-phenylether =I 10. IU I
I 118-74-1-------Hexachlorobenzene _____ ! 10. JU I
I 87-86-5-------Pentachlorophenol _____ I 50. IU I
I 85-01-8-------Phenanthrene ________ l 10. IU I
I 120-12-7-------Anthracene~-~------I 10. IU I
I 84-74-2-------Di-n-butylphthalate ____ I 10. IU I
I 206-44-0-------Fluoranthene ________ l, 10. IU I
I 129-00-0-------Pyrene __ ,.....,---,. ______ I 10. IU I
I 85-68-7-------Butylbenzylphthalate ____ l 10. IU I
I 91-94-1-------3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine ___ l 20. IU · I
I 56-55-3-------Benzo(a)anthracene _____ l 10. IU I
I 218-01-9-------Chrysene __________ l 10. IU I
I· 117-81-7-------bis{2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate I 10. IU I
I 117-84-0-------Di-n-octylphthalate ---==I 10. IU I
I 205-99-2-------Benzo{b)fluoranthene ____ l 10. IU I
I 207-08-9-------Benzo{k)fluoranthene ____ l 10. IU I
I 50-32-8-------Benzo(a)pyrene. _______ l 10. IU I
I 193-39-5-------Indeno(l,2,3-cd)pyrene ___ l 10. IU \
I 53-70-3-------Dibenz{a,h)anthracene ___ I 10. IU I
I 191-24-2-------Benzo{g,h,i)perylene ____ l 10. \U I
1.,....,...----,-....,....-----,-....,,....--.,,.,,......,...-.....,....___,,--I------I---I, (1) -Cannot be separated from diphenylamine
I !
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I'
I
I
I
FORM I SV-2 2 021 1/87 Rev. I
I
I.ab
lF
SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS
Name: IEA Contract: 68-W8-0045
EPA SAMPLE NO.
HC078
.,ab Code: IEA Case No.: 619-80 SAS No.: SDG No.: HC078
ratrix: (soil/water) WATER Lab Sample ID:
l;arnple wt/vol: 500.0 (g/mL) ML Lab File ID: 1121409
Date Received: 10/19/89 ,evel: (low/med) LOW
I, Moisture: not dee. 100. dee. __ Date Extracted: 10/23/89
Date Analyzed: 11/21/89 1:xtraction:
:pc Cleanup:
(SepF/Cont/Sonc) CONT
(Y/N) N pH: 6.0 Dilution Factor: 1.00
I
I
I
I
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
Number ·rics found: 20 (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L
I I I
CAS NUMBER I COMPOUND NAME I RT EST. CONC. Q I ===i ============\ I
1. --!UNKNOWN ACID _______ \ 9.05 100. J \
2 . --I UNKNOWN I 9 . 10 10 0 . J I
3. --\UNKNOWN ACID \ 9.23 100. J I
4. 142-62-llHexanoic acid (DOT) I 9.58 100. J I
5. !UNKNOWN I 9.68 40. J I
6. --!UNKNOWN I 10.32 200. J I
I 7. --\UNKNOWN I 10.57 300. J I
8. --\UNKNOWN I 10. 77 70. J I
9 . --I UNKNOWN I 10. 8 2 7 0 . J I
10. --\UNKNOWN I 11.23 200. J I I 11. --I UNKNOWN J 15 • 5 0 3 0 • J I
12. 103-82-21Benzeneacetic acid I 15.92 200. J \
13. --!UNKNOWN ACID I 17.03 50. J I
I•, 1145 •. -I UNKNOWN I 19. 3 3 100. J I
--\UNKNOWN I 19.98 500. J I
16. --IUNKNOWN I 20.30 40. J I
I:, 17. --I Substituted Indole I 23. 73 500. J I
18. --!UNKNOWN I 24.85 400. J I
19. 57-10-3\Hexadecanoic acid I 25.00 200. J I
I::, ~~: I UNKNOWN I 26. 88 100. J I ______ I l __________ ~ ___ I
: 22. I I ----: i 23. I I ____ , _________ ~
11
1
2 4. I I ___________ , __ _
25. ! ____________ __, ____ . ------~--~
26. I ____________ _, ____ ,---------
1:,· 27. I _____________ --------------
28. I -------------: I 29. l ____________ _, ___ _c _______ , __ _
I 1 30. : _________________ . _________ _
I FORM I SV-TIC 2 022 1/87 Rev.
lD EPA SAMPLE NO.
PESTICIDE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
HC078 ,ab Name: IEA
,ab Code: IE.A
Contract: 68-WB-0045
Case No.: 619-80 SAS No.: SDG No.: HC078
Lab Sample ID: latrix: (soil/water) WATER
;ample wt/vol: 500. (g/mL)ML Lab File ID: DB5A4856
Date Received: 10/19/89
Date Extracted: 10/23/89
Date Analyzed: 11/ 3/89
~evel: (low/med) LOW
; Moisture: not dec.100. dee. 0.
'.xtraction: (SepF/Cont/Sonc) SEPF
;pc Cleanup: (Y/N) N pH:
CAS NO. COMPOUND
6.0 Dilution Factor: 1.00
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
(ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L Q
I I I 319-84-6-----alpha-BHC \ .050 IU I
319-85-7-----beta-BHC I .050 IU I
319-86-8-----delta-BHC I .050 IU I
58-89-9-----gamma-BHC I .050 IU I
76-44-8-----Heptachlor I . 050 I u I
309-00-2-----Aldrin I .050 [U I
1024-57-3-----Heptachlor epoxide I .050 IU I
959-98-8-----Endosulfan I I .050 [U I
60-57-1-----Dieldrin I .10 [U I
72-55-9-----4, 4' -DDE I .10 I U I
72-20-8-----Endrin I .10 I u I
33213-65-9-----Endosulfan II I .10 [U I
72-54-8-----4,4'-DDD I .10 IU I
1031-07-8-----Endosulfan sulfate I . 10 I U I
50-29-3-----4, 4' -DDT I . 10 I U I
72-43-5-----Methoxychlor I . 50 I U I
53494-70-5-----Endrin ketone I .10 IU I
i 5103-71-9-----alpha-Chlordane I . 50 I U I
I 5103-74-2-----gamma-Chlordane I .50 [U I
I 8001-35-2-----Toxaphene I 1.0 IU I
I 12674-11-2-----Aroclor-1016 · I . 50 I u I
I 11104-28-2-----Aroclor-1221 I .50 IU I
I 11141-16-5-----Aroclor-1232 I . 50 I u I
I 53469-21-9-----Aroclor-1242 I .50 [U I
I 12672-29-6-----Aroclor-1248 I .50 IU I
I 11097-69-1-----Aroclor-1254 I 1. o I U I
I 11096-82-5-----Aroclor-1260 I 1.0 JU I l ____________________ l ______ l __ l
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
FORM I PEST
3 020
1/87 Rev.I
I
I
Name: IEA. INC.
ENVIROFORMS/CLF 788
1
INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET . I
I
I
I
I
SAMPLE NO.
HCS078
'------
Date Received: 10/19/89
Latrix (soil/water): WATER
SDG No. : HCS078
Lab Sample ID: 619-81-1
.Level (low/med):
% Solids:
LOW
0.0
Client ID: SBR WASTED SLUDGE
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
lor
l1or
Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg dry weight): UG/L
I 1 I I I I I I
:cAS No. Analyte :concentration:c: Q :M
I I I I I , _____ , _____ , _______ ,_, ___ ,_
:7429-90-5 :Aluminum_: 12400 :_: ___ :.L
:7440-36-0 'Antimony 24.4 :~: ___ [_
:7440-38-2 Arsenic 8.4 :~:N E_
'7440-39-3 ~arium 640 :_: ___ L
7440-41-7 Beryllium 2.2 :~: ___ .L
7440-43-9 Cadmium 4.7 IQI ___ .L
7440-70-2 Calcium 28500 :_: ___ .L
7440-47-3 ,Chromium 328 _: ___ .L,
7440-48-4 : Cobalt 211 _: ___ L:
7440-50-8 :copper 193 _: ___ .L:
7439-89-6 :Iron 18700 _: ___ L:
:7439-92-1 :Lead 47.8 _: ___ ,!'_:
:743~~95-4 :Magnesium 38600 _: ___ L:
7439-96-5 IManganese 58900 _: ___ L:
7439-97-6 'Mercury 0.20 'Qi ___ cv:
7440-02-0 Nickel 71.9 _: ___ L:
7440-09-7 Potassiuw_ 7880 _: ___ .L:
7782-49-2 Selenium 2.0 Qi ___ E_
7440-22-4 Silver 8.6 ~lN .L
7440-23-5 Sodium 362000 _: ____ .L
7440-28-0 Thallium 2.0 ,Q: ___ :E_
7440-62-2 ,Vanadium 26.0 :g: ___ :L
7440-66-6 :zinc 781 :_: ___ :L
_____ :cyanide 10.0 IQI ___ :~
Before: BROWN
After: LT.YELLOW
Clarity Before: CLOUDY
Clarity After: CLEAR
Texture:
Artifacts:
Immen ts:
SBR WASTED SLUDGE
I , 4 002
ENVIROFORMS/CLP 788
1
INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
Contract:
SAMPLE NO.
HCSl00
I
I
I Lab Name: IEA, INC.
Lab Code: IEA Case No.:
Matrix (soil/water): WATER
SAS No.: SDG No. : HCSl00 I
Lab Sample ID: 619-97-1
I Level (low/med): LOW Date Received: 11/10/89
% Solids: 0.0
Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg dry weight): UG/L
I I I I I I I I :cAs No. Analyte :concentration:c: Q M I l I I I -=----c---:-:-----:::-' ---,--,-----------c--:-::--c--I_ I __ _ :7429-90-5 :Aluminum 20500 :_: ___ L
:7440-36-0 ;Antimony 69.1 :_:~N ___ L
:7440-38-2 ;Arsenic 8.4 :~:N""----I_ :7440-39-3 ;Barium : 1750 :_;N L ;7440-41-7 ;Beryllium : 2.5 :~:N L,
7440-43-9 :cadmium : 4.7 ;y:N :L: 7440-70-2 'Calcium ; 40700 :_; :L: 7440-47-3 Chromium : 551 :_: :_P_: 7440-48-4 Cobalt ; 539 :_;N :_P_:
7440-50-8 Copper : 331 ;_'N :_P_; 7439-89-6 Iron : 67400 : _____ :_P_:
7439-92-1 Lead ; 64.1 : _____ ;.r_:
7 439-95-4 Magnesium : 4 7100 : _ ; _P_:
7439-96-5 :Manganese : 201000 :_ =E ___ :_P_; 7439-97-6 ;Mercury : 0.74 :_ ~N ___ :_c_v:
7440-02-0 :Nickel : 206 ' N :L: ,7440-09-7 :Potassium _____ 9_5_8_o_i= ~--;_P_:
7782-49-2 ',Selenium 2.0 'UN 'F ' -----"-'--=-'-___ ,_, 7440-22-4 ;silver 32.2 :_,N :_P_;
7440-23-5 :sodium 459000 :_: :L: 7440-28-0 ;Thallium 2.0 ;y: :.r_:
7440-62-2 ',Vanadium 26.0 'U'N 'P ' ----~=-=-I -t ! -1 7440-66-6 ', Zinc 4270 ' 1 'p 1 ----~=-=-I_ I ___ 1 _ 1 ______ ; cyanide ----~l""'O"-'-. o=-; .Q: : _c_:
,lor Before: LT.BROWN
,lor After: YELLOW
Clarity Before: CLOUDY
Clarity After: CLEAR
Texture:
Artifacts:
,mments:
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I ' ,, J. ,-i EF·A ·~HMF'LE i-iiJ. I .;□ '/(JLATILC: ,Jf;GANIC:: ,~t,,AL'i'Sl':c DATA •::iHEET r-J~.me: IEA Con~t•3c~: 68-WB-0045 S,D i .• ~·::C::e: !EA Case i,Jo. 619-0: SAS No. SDG No. -· -• • -.. , '::'I J '-' ' ' lal:1"" ,,~01' 'w-r,~t'' WATE~ L 2.0 S .=-.mp le ID: HC102 ,-,c102 .3CTIO i e l2vei: ~•J°t/'/Ol: ~. ~:;oo i'.,;i/mLJ i1L Lab File ID: 1123~10 tlowlmed) LIJW Date Received: ll/10/89 : (1(,. I Moiscure: not dee. ~lumn: ;pac~~/cao) CAP Date Analyzed: 11/23/89 I I I I I I I I I I I I I Di 1,_,tion F9,cto,·: CriS f\JI]. COMF'OUND -4-;7-~-------Chlot•ometh0ne CONCENTF;ATION UNITS: (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L 74--83-9-------Sr·omametnane __________ _ 75-01-4-------'Jinyi Chlot·1de ________ _ 7S-00-3--------~'.1loroet~21·1e __________ _ 75-00-2-------Methylene Chlot•ide ______ _ 1 (t. 10. 10. 1 ('. e _, . 67-64--1-----~--Ace~one 31 (H). 75-15-0-------Car·bon Disulfide _______ _ 75·-~S--4-------l.1-Dichloroethene ______ _ -5-34-:-------1. 1-Dichlar·oethane ______ _ 340-59-0-------1.2-Dichloroethene (total) .s7-66-3-------Chlor·ofor·m ___________ _ 1~7--06-2--------t.:-Dichlor·oethane ______ _ ;s-Q3-3-------2-Butanane ___________ _ -· l -55--6--------L . l. 1-T 1·· i. cil 1 o roethane ~6-:::-5-------~a,·bon Tetr·achlor·1de ____ _ 108-05--4-------:Jinyl ~cetate 75-~7-.1-------~r~amodichlor·ometnane ____ _ 78-87·--5-------1.:-□icnloroor·~oane 1. ;:~~)b 1. --•71 t --··::",-----------=-~ :. ::-: .. 3-D i c r1 1 01·· oo t"'c.10 en e 79-0l-□-------7r'ichlor·oethene ~:4-.18-1--------~ibr·0mochlor·amethane ____ _ :~9-00-5-------~! 1!:-·rr·icnlor·oetnane 71-43-2-------~enzene 10061-0:--6-------i;r•3ns-1!3-Dichlor·opr·ooene 75-:S-2-------Br•omofor·m 108-10-1-------~-Methyl-2-Pentanone ____ _ ~91-78-6-------:-He:-:anone ___________ _ :=7--!8-4-------Tetrachlor·oethene 79-34-5-------1.1.2.2-Tetr·acnlor·□ethane 108-88-~-------T,Jluene :. OB-==·o-7-------·= h 1 a r·ob en z =ne 100-~1--4-------~thylbenzene __________ _ ~00-~=-s-------~t·.·t~9ne ~3:0-20-7-------·,:ylene •.total) _________ _ ~ _, . e _, . e _,, e _, . e _, . e _, . •~·(,. e _, . :~. 1 (l. :, . •= -'• r. ··' . _, . e -'. e _, . ~ _, . r. _, . e .,J • 1 (,. 10. e _, . e ,.,J • e _, . r. --'• r. -' . ~ ,h ·= _, . 1. ()(, Q : 'J ' u :u :u :u E :u :u :u :u :u :u 'U lj : r I ,_, : ,j : lj . !j : lj I lj : !J IJ ·u ;u ' IJ :u :u :u :u :u ' lj IJ :u
!::r'A SAMF'LE rm.
VOLATILE □RGANIC3 ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
TENTATI'!EL'( !DENTiFIED COMF'OUNDS
C □ntt•act: 68-WB-0045
HC102
Case No.: 619-0 2 SAS No. SDG No. HC102
i~o1ltwater• WATER Lab Sam□ie ID:
amcle wt/vol: 5.000 >;u'mL) ML Lab File ID: 1123310
evei: (low/med) LOW Date Received: 11/10/89
Date Anal y::ed: l 1 /23/89
:Jlum17: 1 oack/caol CAP Di l•-ltion Fa.ct □r:
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
Cug;L or ug/Kg1 IJG/L
-,
COMF'QUND /-JAME
~,92-·~5-5:For·mic 2cid. 0thenyl e~ter·
; UN~n-.JOl>J~J
: ur,KNOWN P,LCOHOL
: UNf<NOWN
: UNKNOl-JN
-~. --------
2. ·-·.
. ~
J .• .J.
------------------··.
~ ... i:-
-~ . ..J. --------
28. ' -------' ·-------------------
~ ~= ...:.. • ...:.. ,._J
= == • . .J • -...,j ,..1
7.3()
13.37
14.85
EST. C:ONC.
-io . a,:,.
:o.
30.
1 (1.
J
J
J
J
J
r=oRM I '..10A-T IC 1/87 ~.ev.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
11
I I
I lB EPA SAMPLE NO.
SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
I Name: IEA
HC102
Contract: 68-W8-0045
1 Code: IEA Case No. : 619-95 SAS No.: SDG No.: HC102
ix: (soil/water) WATER Lab Sample ID:
Ile wt/vol: 500.0 (q/mLl ML Lab File ID: 1218404
Date Received: 11/10/89
Date Extracted: 11/14/89
Date Analyzed: 12/18/89
l: (low/med) LOW
I isture: not dee. 100. dee. __ _
action:
I Cleanup:
(SepF/Cont/Sonc) SEPF
(Y/N) N pH: . 6. 0 Dilution Factor:
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
CAS NO. COMPOUND
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
(ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L
108-95-2-------Phenol .,,..,.--,-----,---,--,---,-----l l l -44 -4 - - - - - - -bis ( 2 -Chlo roe thy l) ether
95-57-8-------2-Chlorophenol ______ _
541-73-1-------1,3-Dichlorobenzene
106-46-7-------1,4-Dichlorobenzene
100-51-6-------Benzyl alcohol 95-50-1-------1,2-Dichloroben-ze_n_e ____ _
95-48-7-------2-Methylphenol ___ ..,....,.--,---
108-60-l-------bis(2-Chloroisopropyl)ether
106-44-5-------4-Methylphenol ______ _
621-64-7-------N-Nitroso-di-n-propylamine
67-72-1-------Hexachloroethane ------98-95-3-------Nitrobenzene --------78 -59 - l - - - - - - -Is op ho r on c ________ _
88-75-5-------2-Nitrophenol
105-67-9-------2,4-Dimethylphenol
65-85-0-------Benzoic acid -----
lll-91-l-------bis(2-Chloroethoxy)methane
120-83-2-------2,4-Dichlorophenol -----120-82-1-------l,2,4-Trichlorobenzenc
91-20-3-------Naphthalene ---
106-47-8-------4-Chloroaniline
87-68-3-------Hexachlorobutadiene
59-50-7-------4-Chloro-3-methylphenol
91-57-6-------2-Methylnaphthalene
77-47-4-------Hexachlorocyclopentadienc
88-06-2-------2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
95-95-4-------2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
91-58-7-------2-Chloronaphthalene
88-74-4-------2-Nitroaniline -------131-11-3-------Dimethylphthalate
208-96-8-------Acenaphthylene ______ _
606-20-2-------2,6-Dinitrotoluene -----
FORM I SV-1
100.
100.
160.
100.
100.
100.
100.
100.
100.
100.
100.
100.
100.
100.
100. c O O.
1900.
100.
100.
100.
100.
100.
100.
100.
100.
100.
100.
500.
100.
500.
100.
100.
100.
10.00
Q
I
!U :u
ID
IU
iU
IU
IU
!U
IU
IU
1.U
iU
IU :u
IU
:u
\0
iU
;u
IU
\U
IU
!U
IU
IU
iU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
lU
IU
I
l/87 Rev.
lC EPA SAMPLE NO.
S&~IVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
HC102 lame: IEA Contract: 68-W8-0045
Case No.:
_x: (soil/water) WATER
619-95 SAS No.: SDG No.: HC102
Lab Sample lD:
_e wt/vol: :,00.0
(low/med) LOW
.sture: not dee. 100.
(g/mL) ML
dee. ---
,ction: ( SepF /Cont/Sane l SEPF
Lab File ID: 1218404
Date Received: 11/10/89
Date Extracted: 11/14/89
Date Analyzed: 12/18/89
:leanup: (Y/N) N pH: 6.0 Dilution Factor: 10.00
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
CAS NO. COMPOUND (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L Q
I 99-09-2-------3-Nitroaniline 500. IU -------83-32-9-------Acenaphthene 100. [U
51-28-5-------2,4-Dinitrop~h-e_n_o~l------500. [U
100-02-7-------4-Nitrophenol 500. [U
132-64-9-------Dibenzofuran 100. [U ---:--------12 l -l 4 - 2 - - - - - - -2, 4 -Dini trot o l u en e 100. IU
84-66-2-------Diethylphthalate -----100. [U
7 00 5-72-3-------4-Chlorophenyl-phenylether 100. I U
86-73-7-------Fluorene-,-~--------100. [U
100-01-6-------4-Nitroaniline SOD. [U
534-52-1-------4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol 500. [U
36-30-6-------N-Nitrosodiphenylarnine ( l) i 100. I U
101-55-3-------4-Bromophenyl-phenylether -I 100. iU
118-74-1---~---Hexachlorobenzene _____ I 100. :u
37-86-5-------Pentachlorophenol _____ I 500. IU
85-01-8-------Phenanthrene ________ l 100. iU
120-12-7-------Anthracene~--,---,.------I 100. IU
84-74-2-------Di-n-butylphthalate ____ I 100. IU
206-~4-0-------Fluoranthene ________ l 100. \U
129-00-0-------?yrene __ -,-~~-,------I 100. IU
85-68-7-------Butylbenzylphthalate ____ l 100. IU
91-94-l-------3, 3' -Dichlorobenzidine ___ l 200. : U
56-55-3-------Benzo(a)anthracene _____ l 100. IU
218-01-9-------Chrysene,_..,...,...---,.-,-~~-,---l 100. IU
ll7-81-7-------bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate I 100. [U
117-84-0-------Di-n-octylphthalate ____ I 100. [U
205-99-2-------Benzo(b)fluoranthene ____ l 100. IU
207-08-9-------Benzo ( k) fluoranthene ____ l 100. \ U
50-32-8-------Benzo(a)pyrene~ ______ I 100. [U
193-39-5-------Indeno(l,2,3-cd)pyrene ___ l lOO. :u
53-70-3-------Dibenz(a,h)anthracene ___ I 100. IU
~91-24-2-~-----Benzo(g,h,i)perylene ____ l 100. [U
i -:-:----::-----,------.---~---,-,--,,---,----,---1 _______ ! ---( l) -Cannot be separatea from diphenylarnine
FORM I SV-2 1/87 Rev.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I·
I
I
I
I lF EPA SAMPLE NO.
lame:
SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS
HC102 IEA Contract: 68-W8-0045
lode: IEA Case No.: 619-95 SAS No.: SDG No.: HC102
i.x: (soil/water) WATER Lab Sample ID: I e wt/vol: 500.0 (g/mL) ML Lab File ID: 1218404
1, (low/med) LOW
.scure: not dee. 100. dee. __
Date Received: 11/10/89
Date Extracted: 11/14/89
Date Analyzed: 12/18/89 (SepF/Cont/Sonc) SEPF lction:
:leanup: (Y/Nl N pH: 6.0 Dilution Factor: 10.00
I )er TICs found: 20
ls NUMBER I COMPOUND NAME
============= I
I 3724-65-0\Crotonic acid (DOT) -\UNKNOWN ACID -\UNKNOWN
I 96-48-0\Butyrolactone -\UNKNOWN -\UNKNOWN ACID
I -\UNKNOWN
lll-46-6\Ethanol, 2,2'-oxybis--\UNKNOWN
-\UNKNOWN I -I UNKNOWN -\UNKNOWN
-\UNKNOWN
I -\UNKNOWN -I UNKNOWN ACID
28134-31-BIBenzoic acid, ethyl-
I -I UNKNOWN
91-56-5\lH-Indole-2,3-dione -I UNKNOWN
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
(ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L
i
I RT EST.
I
I 8.57
I 8.70
I 8.98
I 9.10
I 9.62
I 10.20
I 10.30
I 10.40
I 10.45
! 13.27
I 13.90
I 14.48
I 14.80
I 14.87
I 16.55
I 17 .13
I l8.70
! 21.62
I 22.37
I 487-39-8\lH-Indole-3-carboxaldehyde_l 22.93
I I
I
I
I I
I
I
I I
I
I
I I
I
I FORM I SV-TIC
CONC.
5000. J
500. J
500. J
1000. J
100. J
2000. J
700. J
2000. J
2000. J
200. J
400. J
200. J
200. J
100. J
2000. J
900. J
300. J
100. J
200. J
700. J
1/87
Q
Rev.
lD EPA SAMPLE NO. PESTICIDE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
HC102 Contract: 68-W8-0045 Name: IEA
Code: IEA Case No.: 619-95 SAS No.: SDG No.: HC102
Lab Sample ID: ix: (soil/water) WATER
le wt/vol: 500. (g/mL)ML
l: (low/med) LOW
isture: not dec.100. dee.
action: (SepF/Cont/Sonc) CONT
0.
Lab File ID: DB5A5094
Date Received: 11/10/89
Date Extracted: 11/16/89
Date Analyzed: 12/ 1/89
Cleanup: (Y/N) N pH: 6.0 Dilution Factor: 1.00
CONCENTRATION UNITS: CAS NO. COMPOUND (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L Q
I I I 319-84-6-----alpha-BHC I .050 IU I 319-85-7-----beta-BHC I .050 IU I 319-86-8-----delta-BHC I .050 IU I 58-89-9-----gamma-BHC I .050 IU I 76-44-8-----Heptachlor I .050 lU I 309-00-2-----Aldrin I .050 IU I 1024-57-3-----Heptachlor epoxide I .050 IU I 959-98-8-----Endosulfan I I .050 IU I 60-57-1-----Dieldrin I .10 IU I 72-55-9-----4,4'-DDE I .10 IU I 72-20-8-----Endrin I .10 IU I 33213-65-9-----Endosulfan II I .10 IU I 72-54-8-----4,4'-DDD I .10 IU I 1031-07-8-----Endosulfan sulfate I .10 IU I 50-29-3-----4,4'-DDT I .10 1u I 72-43-5-----Methoxychlor I .50 IU I 53494-70-5-----Endrin ketone I .10 IU I 5103-71-9-----alpha-Chlordane I .50 IU I 5103-74-2-----gamma-Chlordane I .so IU I 8001-35-2-----Toxaphene I 1.0 iU I 12674-11-2-----Aroclor-1016 I .50 1,U r 11104-28-2-----Aroclor-1221 I .50 :u I 11141-16-5-----Aroclor-1232 I .50 iU I 53469-21-9-----Aroclor-1242 I .50 IU I 12672-29-6-----Aroclor-1248 I .50 IU I 11097-69-1-----Aroclor-1254 I 1.0 IU I 11096-82-5-----Aroclor-1260 I 1.0 IU I I I I
FORM I PEST 3 010 1/87 Rev.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
:CA EPA SAMPLE NO ..
VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
HC112
Name: IEA Contract: 68-W8-0045
IJ Code: IEA Case No.:
trix: (soil/water) WATER
619-107 SAS No.: SDG No.: HC112
Lab Sample ID:
lnple wt/vol: 5.000 (g/mL) ML Lab File ID: 1217303
Date Received: 12/ 8/89
Date Analyzed: 12/17/89
1el: (low/med) LOW
l1oisture: not dee. 100.
(pack/cap) C.?>.P Dilution Factor:
CAS NO. COMPOUND
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
(ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L
74-87-3-------Chloromethane
74-83-9-------Bromomethane --------75 - 0 l - 4 - - - - - - -Vinyl Chloride ______ _
75-00-3-------Chloroethane _______ _
75-09-2-------Methylene Chloride ____ _
67-64-1-------Acetone
75-15-0-------carbon Disulfide ------75-35-4-------1,l-Dichloroethene ____ _
75-34-3-------1,1-Dichloroethane ____ _
540-59-0-------1,2-Dichloroethene (total)
67-66-3-------Chloroform ---------107 -06 - 2 -~ - - - - -l, 2 -Di ch lo roe thane ____ _
78-93-3-------2-Butanone ~--------7 l -55 - 6 - - - - - - -l, l, l -Tri ch lo roe thane
56-23-5-------carbon Tetrachloride ----108-05-4-------Vinyl Acetate
75-27-4-------Bromodichloromethane ----
1 78-87-5-------1,2-Dichloropropane \10061-01-5-------cis-l,3-Dichloropropene
I 79-01-6-------Trichloroethene
I 124-48-1-------Dibromochloromethane ___ _
79-00-5-------1,1,2-Trichloroethane
i 71-43-2-------aenzene
\10061-02-6-------trans-l,3-Dichloropropene
I 75-25-2-------Bromoform
I 108-10-1-------4-Methyl-2-Pentanone ----1 591-78-6-------2-Hexanone_---,-______ _
127-18-4-------Tetrachloroethene
79-34-5-------1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
108-88-3-------Toluene
108-90-7-------Chlorobenzene
100-41-4-------Ethylbenzene --------100 -42 -5 - - - - - - -Styrene
1330-20-7-------Xylene (total) ______ _
500.
500.
500.
500.
250.
6600.
250.
250.
250.
250.
250.
250.
500.
250.
250.
500.
250.
250.
250.
250.
250.
250.
250.
250.
250.
500.
500.
250.
250.
250.
250.
250.
250.
250.
50.00
Q
I I
IU I
IU I
IU I
\U I
\U I
I I
\U I
\U I
\U I
\U I
\U I
IU I
IU I
IU I
IU I
IU I
IU I
IU I iu I
IU I
IU I
IU I
IU I
IU I
IU I
!U I
IU I
IU I
iU I
IU I
\U I
IU I
IU I
IU I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
----------------------_______ !, __ I
FORM I VOA 1/87 Rev.
J..E EPA SAMPLE NO.
'lOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS
HC112
Contract: 68-W8-0045 J Name: IEA
:; Code: IEA case No.: 619-107 SAS No.: SDG No.: HC112
Lab Sample ID: ~rix: (soil/water) WATER
nple wt/vol: 5.000
1el: (low/med) LOW
1oisture: not dee. 100.
L~~n: (pack/cap) CAP
.unber TICs found: 0
(g/mL) ML Lab File ID: 1217303
Date Received: 12/ 8/89
Date Analyzed: 12/17/89
Dilution Factor:
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
(ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L
50.00
I I I
CAS NUMBER I COMPOUND NAME I RT EST. CONC. \ Q I
=============== I I=== ===== 1----1
l. ______ l _____________ l I I
2. ______ I I I __ _,
3. ______ I I I __
4. ______ I I I __
5. ______ I I __________ _, __ _
6. ______ I .1-~--_________ _
7. ______ I I ____ , _______ ---
8. ______ I I _____________ _
9. ______ I I __________ _, __ _
~o. ______ l I ____ ---~---·---
Ll. ______ l I ____ -------'---L2. ______ I I _____________ _
L3. ______ I I ____ ----------14. ______ I I _____________ _
LS. ______ I j ____ ----------
L6. ______ I I ____ ----------
L 7. ______ I I ____ ----------
LB. ______ \ I _____________ _
i.9. ______ I I _____________ _
20. ______ I I ___________ , __ _
-~· ______ I I ___________ , ___ ,
CL, ______ ! I ___________ , __ _
23. ______ I I ___________ , __ _
24. ______ ! I ___________ , __ _
25. ____________________ I ___________ , __ _
or I LO. _______________________________ _
27. I ___________ , __ __,
23. ____________________ I ____ ----------29. I _____________ _
3 o. I _____________ _
-------_____________ I ____ -------___ ,
I
11
I
I
I
I
I,
I
I I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
FORM I VOA-TIC 1/87 Rev. I
I
I lE EPA SAMPLE NO.
I, Name: IEA
VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS
Contract: 68-W8-0045
r!Cll2
, Code: IEA Case No. :
l:rix: (soil/water) WATER
619-107 SAS No.: SDG No.: HC112
1~1e we/vol: 5.000 (g/mL) ML
,el: (low/med) LOW
lioiscure: not dee. 100.
Lab Sample ID:
Lab File ID: 1217303
Date Received: 12/ 8/89
Date Analyzed: 12/17/89
•. umn: (pack/cap) CAP Dilution Factor: 1.00
lunber TICs found: 0
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
(ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L
CAS NUMBER \ COMPOUND NAME
• ,==============! l. ______ l ____________ _
2. ______ --------------
1 3. __ _
4. -------------5. ------
I 6.
7 . ------
8. ______ --------------
9. ______ --------------1.0 ·--------------------
.1. ______ --------------i
__ 2. --------------------I
I
I
I •
_3. --------------------
,4 . ______ --------------
'_:). --------------------I I 1 t~ : ______ --------------
,8 ·--------------------
,9. --------------------
• (0. --------------------
.1. ______ --------------
~ 2. ------1 :3. --------------------
,4. ______ --------------
25. ______ --------------
126.
27. ______ --------------
28. ______ --------------29. 1 io. --------------------
•
I
FORM I VOA-TIC
I
RT I EST.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I I
I
I
I
I
I
I
CONC .
I
I
I
I
\.
I
I
' I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1/87
Q
Rev.
lB EPA SAMPLE NO.
SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
HC112
Contract: 68-WB-0045 l Name: IEA
i Code: IEA Case No.: 619-107 SAS No.:
:rix: (soil/water) WATER
SDG No. : HC112
Lab Sample ID:
1ple wt/vol: 500.0
,el:· (low/med) LOW
loisture: not dee. 100.
(g/mL) ML
dee. __ _
:raction: (SepF/Cont/Sonc) CONT
Lab File ID: 0116405
Date Received: 12/ 8/89
Date Extracted: 12/12/89
Date Analyzed: 1/16/90
Cleanup: (Y/N) N pH: 6. 0 Dilution Factor:
CAS NO. COMPOUND
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
(ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L
I
108-95-2-------Phenol=-,----,---,-,--...,....----I
lll-44-4-------bis(2-Chloroethyl)ether I
95-57-8-------2-Chlorophenol _______ l
541-73-1-------1,3-Dichlorobenzene ____ I
106-46-7-------1,4-Dichlorobenzene ____ I
100-51-6-------Benzyl alcohol _______ !
95-50-1-------1,2-Dichlorobenzene ____ I
95-48-7-------2-Methylphenol __ ~,-,---,---I
108-60-l-------bis(2-Chloroisopropyl)ether I
106-44-5-------4-Methylphenol __ ~,---,---I
621-64-7-------N-Nitroso-di-n-propylamine I
67-72-1-------Hexachloroethane ______ l
98-95-3-------Nitrobenzene ________ l
78-59-1-------Isophorone_-,--_______ I
88-75-5-------2-Nitrophenol -~-----!
105-67-9-------2,4-Dimethylphenol _____ l
65-85-0-------Benzoic acid -,----,------,----111 -91-l - - - - - - -bis ( 2 -Chlo r oethoxy) me thane
120-83-2-------2,4-Dichlorophenol ____ _
120-82-1-------1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene ---91-20-3-------Naphthalene
106-47-8-------4-Chloroaniline
87-68-3-------Hexachlorobutadiene
59-50-7-------4-Chloro-3-methylphenol
91-57-6-------2-Methylnaphthalene
77-47-4-------Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
88-06-2-------2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
95-95-4-------2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
91-58-7-------2-Chloronaphthalene
88-74-4-------2-Nitroaniline -------131-11-3-------Dimethylphthalate
208-96-8-------Acenaphthylene 606-20-2-------2,6-Dinitrotolu--e-n_e ____ _
I
10. IU
10. IU
10. IU
10. IU
10. IU
10. IU
10. lU
10. IU
10. I u
10. IU
10. IU
10. I u
10. IU
10. IU
10. IU
10. I u
29. I J
10. IU
10. IU
10. i U
10. I u
10. i U
10. IU
10. IU
10. I u
10. IU
10. IU
50. IU
10. IU
50. IU
10. iU
10. IU
10. I u
1.00
Q
-----------------------_______ I __ _
FORM I SV-1 1/87
'
Rev.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I I
I
I
I lC EPA SAMPLE NO.
SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
I Lab Name: IEA
HC112
Contract: 68-W8-0045
I Lab Code: IEA Case No.: 619-107 SAS No.: SDG No.: HC112
Matrix: (soil/water) WATER Lab Sample ID:
I Sample wt/vol: 500.0 (g/mL) ML Lab File ID: 0116405
Date Received: 12/ 8/89
Date Extracted: 12/12/89
Date Analyzed: 1/16/90
1 Level:
% Moisture: not dee. 100.
(low/med) LOW
dee. __ _
I Extraction: (SepF/Cont/Sonc) CONT
GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) N pH: 6. 0 Dilution Factor: 1.00.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
CAS NO. COMPOUND
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
(ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L
I
99-09-2-------3-Nitroaniline _______ l
83-32-9-------Acenaphthene I
51-28-5-------2,4-Dinitrophenol I
100-02-7-------4-Nitrophenol I·
132-64-9-------Dibenzofuran I
121-14-2-------2,4-Dinitrotoluene I
84-66-2-------Diethylphthalate I
7005-72-3-------4-Chlorophenyl-phenylether I
86-73-7-------Fluorene I
100-01-6-------4-Nitroaniline I
5 3 4-52-1-------4, 6-Dinitro-·2-methylphenol I
86-30-6-------N-Nitrosodiphenylamine (1) I
101-55-3-------4-Bromophenyl-phenylether I
118-74-1-------Hexachlorobenzene I
87-86-5-------Pentachlorophenol I
85-01-8-------Phenanthrene I
120-12-7-------Anthracene I
34-74-2-------Di-n-butylphthalate I
206-44-0-------Fluoranthene I
129-00-0-------Pyrene !
85-68-7-------Butylbenzylphthalate I
91-94-1-------3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine I
56-55-3-------Benzo(a)anthracene I
I 218-01-9-------Chrysene I
I ll7-81-7-------bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate I
I 117-84-0-------Di-n-octylphthalate I
I 205-99-2-------Benzo(b)fluoranthene I
I 207-08-9-------Benzo(k)fluoranthene I
I 50-32-8-------Benzo(a)pyrene I
I 193-39-5-------Indeno(l,2,3-cd)pyrene I
I 53-70-3-------Dibenz(a,h)anthracene I
I 191-24-2-------Benzo(g,h,i)perylene I
50.
10.
50.
50.
10.
10.
10.
10.
10. so. so.
10.
10.
10.
50.
10.
10.
9.
10.
10.
10.
20.
10.
10.
10.
10.
10.
10.
10.
10.
10.
10.
l~------,-------,---,,-----,~~-~~--1 _____ _ (1) -Cannot be separated from diphenylamine
FORM I SV-2
Q
I I
IU I
\U I
\U I
\U I
IU I
IU I
\U I
IU I
\U I
IU I
\U I
\U I
\U I
\U I
1.U I
IU I
IU I
I J I
IU I
[U I
IU I
IU I
IU I
[U I
IU I
\U I
\U I
IU I
[U I
\U I
\U I
\U
I
1/87
2
Rev.
009
lF EPA SAMPLE NO.
SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS
HC112
I.ab Name: IEA
Lab Code: IEA
Contract: 68-W8-0045
Case No.: 619-107 SAS No.:
Matrix: ( soil/water l WATER
Sample wt/vol: 500.0 (g/mL) ML
Level: (low/med) LOW
% Moisture: not dee. 100. dee. __
Extraction: (SepF/Cont/Sonc) CONT
SDG No.: HC112
Lab Sample ID:
Lab File ID: 0116405
Date Received: 12/ 8/89
Date Extracted: 12/12/89
Date Analyzed: 1/16/90
GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) N pH: 6.0 Dilution Factor: 1.00
Nwnber TICS found: 20
I
I CAS NUMBER I COMPOUND NAME
\================!
1. --\UNKNOWN ACID
2. 503-64-0IIsocrotonic acid
3. 109-52-4\Pentanoic acid
4. --\UNKNOWN
5. --\UNKNOWN
6. 142-62-1\Hexanoic acid (DOT)
7 . 103-82-2\Benzeneacetic acid
8. \UNKNOWN
9. --\UNKNOWN ACID
10. --\UNKNOWN AROMATIC
11. --\UNKNOWN ACID
12. --[UNKNOWN
l3. 143-07-7\Dodecanoic acid
14. 91-56-5\lH-Indole-2,3-dione
15. 544-63-8\Tetradecanoic acid
16. --\UNKNOWN ACID
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
(ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L
I
I RT EST.
I
I 8.73
I 9.00
I 9.47
I 9.55
I 10.27
I 10.92
I 15.27
I 16.25
I 16.43
I 18.67
I 19.28
I 19.38
I 19.58
I 21. 60
I 22.00
I 22.33
17. 487-89-811H-Indole-3-carboxaldehyde_l 22.95
18. -[UNKNOWN I 24.05
19. -\UNKNOWN ACID I 26.10
20. 57-11-4\Octadecanoic acid I 26.27
21. I I
22. I I
23. I I
24. I I
25. I I
26. I I
27. I
28. I
i 29. I
3 0. I
I
FORM I SV-TIC
CONC.
500. J
600. J
500. J
30. J
600. J
200. J
90. J
40. J
90. J
90. J
200. J
100. J
90. J
60. J
80. J
30. J
700. J
200. J
300. J
200. J
1/87
2
Q
Rev.
010
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
lD EPA SAMPLE NO.
PESTICIDE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
Lab Name: IEA
Lab Code: IEA
Matrix: (soil/water)
Sample wt/vol:
Level: (low/med)
HC112
Contract: 68-W8-0045
Case No.: 619-107 SAS No.: SDG No. : HC112
Lab Sample ID: WATER
500. (g/mL)ML
LOW
% Moisture: not dec.100. dee. o.
I Extraction: (SepF/Cont/Sonc) CONT
Lab File ID: DB5A5259
Date Received: 12/ 8/89
Date Extracted: 12/12/89
Date Analyzed: 12/17/89
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) N pH: 6.0 Dilution Factor:
CAS NO. COMPOUND
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
(ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L
319-84-6-----alpha-BHC
319-85-7-----beta-BHC
319-86-8-----delta-BHC
58-89-9-----gamma-BHC
76-44-8-----Heptachlor
309-00-2-----Aldrin
1024-57-3-----Heptachlor epoxide
959-98-8-----Endosulfan I
60-57-1-----Dieldrin
72-55-9-----4,4'-DDE
72-20-8-----Endrin
33213-65-9-----Endosulfan II
72-54-8-----4,4'-DDD
1031-07-8-----Endosulfan sulfate
50-29-3-----4,4'-DDT
72-43-5-----Methoxychlor
53494-70-5-----Endrin ketone
5103-71-9-----alpha-Chlordane
5103-74-2-----gamma-Chlordane
8001-35-2-----Toxaphene
12674-11-2-----Aroclor-1016
11104-28-2-----Aroclor-1221
11141-16-5-----Aroclor-1232
53469-21-9-----Aroclor-1242
12672-29-6-----Aroclor-1248
11097-69-1-----Aroclor-1254
11096-82-5-----Aroclor-1260
.050
.050
.050
.050
.050
.050
.050
.050
.10
.10
.10
.10
.10
.10
.10
.50
.10
.50
.50
1.0
.50
.50
.50
.50
.50
1.0
1.0
I IU IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU IU IU IU IU IU
IU
\U IU IU
IU
IU
IU IU IU
\U
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
1.00
Q
---------------------______ I __
FORM I PEST .-3 Q Q 8 l / 8 7 Rev.
ENVIROFORMS/CLP 788
l
INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
Contract:
SAMPLE NO.
HCSll2 Lab Name: IEA, INC.
Lab Coae: I EA Case No.:
Matrix (sail/water): WATER
~evel (low/med): LOW
0.0
SAS No.: SDG No.: HCSll2
Lab Sample ID: 619-108
Date Received: 12/08/89
0,5 Solids:
Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg dry weight): UG/L
' ' :cAS No. Analyte
I I I I
l I I l
:concentration:c: Q :M ;
! I I I I ______ , ________ , _, ____ , _,
:7429-90-5
;7440-36-0
7440-38-2
7440-39-3
7440-41-7
7440-43-9
7440-70-2
7440-47-3
7440-48-4
7440-50-8
,7439-89-6
7439-92-1
7439-95-4
7439-96-5
7439-97-6
7440-02-0
7440-09-7
7782-49-2
7440-22-4
,7440-23-5
;7440-28-0
;7440-62-2
:7440-66-6
; A 1 um i num ----~2~8=3..,0~0~; _; ____ : e_;
; Antimony _____ 4~0=·~1,_; \:!.: ; p_:
; Arsenic -------"6~--=4,_; §..: NW ; L.:
; Barium ----~2~4..,l~O~! _: : e_;
; Beryllium _____ .....,2~,_: e_: ; e_:
; Cadmium ------=5......,7'-; _: : e_:
; Ca 1 c i um _____ 4=8..,3~0""0~; _: ; e_:
: Chromium _____ _..,,3 .. 7._l.._; _; N ; e_;
: C oba l t -------"8"'3'-'2,_: _: N ; e_:
: Copper ----~1~0=3-"o~: _: : e_:
; I ro n ----~5~1~7 ... o~o~: _: ; e_;
; Lead -------"1-"0'-'l,_; _: NS* : E._;
: Magnesium ____ _,5._0"'""6""0"0._: _: ; p_;
; Man ga nes e -----'",_,3._9.:..::;0.sO.,O._; _: E : e_;
; Mercury _____ o~ .... 5 .. 4'-; _; N : CV:
: Nickel _____ .....,2--'7-'3"-; _; : e_:
;Por.ass1um 1 11100 1_1 ;e_;
; Selenium ,., 4 : §.! : F_:
:silver
:sodium
;-:-hallium
:vanadium
:zinc
_____ 4;a.,,2~,..,8._: _: "N'----; e_:
___ _,2,.,3._8.,_,,0"'0'-'0"-: _: ; e_;
_____ .....,2-' ... 0._; \:!.: NW : f:.._;
-----"=-... 6'"' . ..,o"--: \:!.: ; e_: _____ .. 5.,1..,s.,o._ ; _; ; e_:
______ : Cyanide _____ 1...,.5~ . ..,o'-; _: ; L:
ior Before: DK.BROWN Clarity Before: CLOUDY
lor After: YELLOW Clarity After: CLEAR Artifacts:
:nmen ts:
CLIENT ID=SBR WASTED SLUDGE
cORM I -IN 7/88
t I) I)?
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
i.A EPA SAMPLE NO.
'/OLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
HC113
Lab tlame: IEA Contract: 68-WB-0045
Lab Code: IEA Case No.: 619-107 SAS No.:
,1atrix: (soil/water) WATER
SDG No.: HC112
Lab Sample ID:
Sample wt/vol: 5.000 (g/mL) ML
I Level: (low/med) LOW
Lab File ID: 1217307
Date Received: 12/ 8/89
Date Analyzed: 12/17/89
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
% Moisture: not dee. 100.
Column: (pack/cap) CAP Dilution Factor:
CAS NO. COMPOUND
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
(ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L
74-87-3-------Chloromethane
74-83-9-------Bromomethane --------75-01-4-------Vinyl Chloride ______ _
75-00-3-------Chloroethane~~~-----
75-09-2-------Methylene Chloride ____ _
67-64-1-------Acetone
75-15-0-------carbon Disulfide ------75-35-4-------1,l-Dichloroethene ____ _
75-34-3-------1,1-Dichloroethane ____ _
540-59-0-------1,2-Dichloroethene (total)
67-66-3-------Chloroform ---------107 -06 - 2 - - - - - - -l, 2 -Di ch lo roe thane ____ _
78-93-3-------2-Butanone ---------7 l -55 - 6 - - - - - - -l, l, l -Tri ch lo roe thane
56-23-5-------carbon Tetrachloride ----108-05-4-------Vinyl Acetate
75-27-4-------Bromodichloromethane ----1 78-87-5-------1,2-Dichloropropane
110061-01-5-------cis-l,3-Dichloropropene
! 79-01-6-------Trichloroethene
I 124-48-1-------Dibromochloromethane ----i 79-00-5-------1,1,2-Trichloroethane
I 71-43-2-------Benzene
\10061-02-6-------trans-l,3-Dichloropropene
I 75-25-2-------Bromoform
I 108-10-1-------4-Methyl-2-Pentanone ----1 591-78-6-------2-Hexanone 127-18-4-------Tetrachloro_e_t~h~e_n_e _____ _
79-34-5-------1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
108-88-3-------Toluene
108-90-7-------Chlorobenzene
100-41-4-------Ethylbenzene _______ _
100-42-5-------Styrene
1330-20-7-------Xylene (total) -------
FORM I VOA
10.
10.
10.
10.
5.
10.
5.
5.
5.
5 .
8.
5.
10.
5.
5.
10.
5.
5.
5.
5.
5.
5.
5.
5.
5.
10.
10.
5.
5.
5.
5.
5.
5.
5.
1.00
Q
I
\U
\U
\U
\U
IU
\U
\U
\U
\U
\U
I
\U
\U
IU
IU
IU
\U
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
I
1/87 ?.ev.
• " . ,..
lE EPA SAMPLE NO.
VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS
HC113
~ab Name: IEA Contract: 68-W8-0045
Lab Code: IEA case No.: 619-107 SAS No.: SDG No.: HC112
Lab Sample ID: Matrix: (soil/water) WATER
Sample wt/vol: 5.000 (g/rnL) ML
Level: (low/med) LOW
% Moisture: not dee. 100.
Column: (pack/cap) CAP
Nwnber TICS found: 0
CAS NUMBER
'
COMPOUND NAME
Lab File ID: 1217307
Date Received: 12/ 8/89
Date Analyzed: 12/17/89
Dilution Factor:
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
(ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L
RT EST. CONC.
1.00
Q
~---------------------------------
2. ______ --------------------------
3. ______ ----------------------------' 4. ______ ------------------______ , __
5. ______ ------------------------'---
6. ______ --------------------------
7. ______ ---------------------------
8. ______ --------------------------
9. ______ --------------------------
10. --------------------------------
11. ______ ---------------------------12. ______ ------------------_____ __, __ 13. _____ ~ ________________________ ! __
14. I __ _ 1s. I __ _
15. 1
1
__
17. --------------------------------18. I __ _
19. ) __ _
20. I __
"' I "~·--------------------------------22. I __
23. I __ _
24. I __
25. I __
26. ! __
27. I __
28. I __
29. I __
30. ) __
--------------------------______ I __ _
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
FORM I VOA-TIC 1/87 Rev. I
1 o 17 I
I
I
I
lA EPA SAMPLE NO. VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
HC079 Lab Name: IEA Contract: 68-W8-0045
Lab Code: IEA Case No.: 619-80 SAS No.:
Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL
SDG No.: HC078
Lab Sample ID: I Sample.wt/vol: 5.000 (g/mL) G Lab File ID: 1029203
Date Received: 10/19/89
Date Analyzed: 10/29/89 I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Level: (low/med) LOW
% Moisture: not dee.
Column: (pack/cap) PACK Dilution Factor:
CAS NO. COMPOUND
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
(ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG
I I
I 74-87-3-------CHLOROMETHANE l 52.
I 74-83-9-------BROMOMETHANE l 52.
I 75-01-4-------VINYL CHLORIDE I 52.
I 75-00-3-------CHLOROETHANE I 52.
I 75-09-2-------METHYLENE CHLORIDE I 26.
I 67-64-1-------ACETONE I 530.
I 75-15-0-------CARBON DISULFIDE I 26.
I 75-35-4-------1,1-DICHLOROETHENE I 26.
I 75-34-3-------1,1-DICHLOROETHANE I 26.
I 540-59-0-------1,2-DICHLOROETHENE (TOTAL) _I 26.
I 67-66-3-------CHLOROFORM I 26.
I 107-06-2-------1,2-DICHLOROETHANE I 26.
I 78-93-3-------2-BUTANONE I 78.
I 71-55-6-------1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE I 26.
I 56-23-5-------CARBON TETRACHLORIDE I 26.
I 108-05-4-------VINYL ACETATE I 52.
I 75-27-4-------BROMODICHLOROMETHANE I 26.
I 78-87-5-------1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE I 26.
110061-01-5-------CIS-l,3-DICHLOROPROPENE __ I 26.
I 79-01-6-------TRICHLOROETHENE I 26.
I 124-48-1-------DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE I 26.
I 79-00-5-------1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE I 26.
I 71-43-2-------BENZENE I 26.
110061-02-6-------TRANS-l,3-DICHLOROPROPENE I 26.
I 75-25-2-------BROMOFORM I 26.
I 108-10-1-------4-METHYL-2-PENTANONE I 52.
I 591-78-6-------2-HEXANONE I 52.
I 127-18-4-------TETRACHLOROETHENE I 26.
I 79-34-5-------1,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE I 26.
I 108-88-3-------TOLUENE I 26.
I 108-90-7-------CHLOROBENZENE I 26.
I 100-41-4-------ETHYLBENZENE I 26.
I 100-42-5-------STYRENE I 26.
I 1330-20-7-------XYLENE (TOTAL) I 26.
I I
FORM I VOA 1 027
1.00
Q
I
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IB
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
I
IU
IU
\U
IU
\U
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
I
1/87 Rev.
lE EPA SAMPLE NO.
VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED-COMPOUNDS
Lab Name: IEA
Lab Code: IEA Case No.: 619-80
Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL
Sample wt/vol: 5.000 (g/mL) G
Level: (low/med) LOW
HC079
Contract: 68-W8-0045
SAS No.: SDG No.: HC078
Lab Sample ID:
Lab File ID: 1029203
Date Received: 10/19/89
Date Analyzed: 10/29/89 % Moisture: not dee. 81.
Column: (pack/cap) PACK Dilution Factor: 1.00
I
I , I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Number TICs found: 8
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
(ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG
I CAS NUMBER COMPOUND NAME I RT EST.
f 1. --\Substituted Cyclohexane __ I 16.70
2. 696-29-7\CYCLOHEXANE, ( 1-METHYLETHYL) I 17.50
3. --\UNKNOWN CYCLOALKANE I 17.82 4. --\UNKNOWN I 18.47 5. 5911-04-6\NONANE, 3-METHYL-I 18.75 6. --\UNKNOWN HYDROCARBON I 18.92 7. - -\Substituted Cyclohexane __ I 19.18 8. - -\UNKNOWN I 19.57
9. I I 10. I I 11. I I 12. I 13. I
14. I
15. I
16. I
17. I
18. I
19. I
20. I
21. I
22. I
23. I
24. I
25. I
26. I
27.
28.
29.
30.
CONC.
50. J
50. J
50. J
200. J
40. J
80. J
200. J
80. J
Q
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
FORM I VOA-TIC 1/87 Rev.I
1 0?.8 I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
lB EPA SAMPLE NO.
SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
HC079
Lab Name: IEA
Lab Code: IEA
Contract: 68-W8-0045
Case No.: 619-80 SAS No.: SDG No.: HC078
Lab Sample ID: Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL
Sample wt/vol: 30.0 (g/mL) G Lab File ID: 1027409
Date Received: 10/19/89
Date Extracted: 10/23/89
Date Analyzed: 10/27/89
Level: (low/med) LOW
% Moisture: not dee. 81. dee. __ _
Extraction: (SepF/Cont/Sonc) SONC
GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) N pH: 6.0 Dilution Factor: 1.00
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
CAS NO. COMPOUND ( ug / L or ug /Kg) UG /KG Q
I I
108-95-2-------Phenol.~~----,--,,-,--~---I 1700. \U
lll-44-4-------bis(2-Chloroethyl)ether I 1700. \U
95-57-8-------2-Chlorophenol _______ l 1700. iU
541-73-1-------1,3-Dichlorobenzene ____ I 1700. \U
106-46-7-------1,4-Dichlorobenzene ____ I 1700. \U
100-51-6-------Benzyl alcohol _______ ! 1700. \U
95-50-1-------1,2-Dichlorobenzene ____ I 1700. \U
95-48-7-------2-Methylphenol __ ___,,..,......,...,..--I 1700. \U
108-60-1-------bis(2-Chloroisopropyl)ether I 1700. IU
106-44-5-------4-Methylphenol _______ l 1700. I U
621-64-7-------N-Nitroso-di-n-propylamine I 1700. \U
67-72-1-------Hexachloroethane _____ -_-l 1700. iU
98-95-3-------Nitrobenzene 1700. I U --------78 -59 - l - - - - - - -rs op ho r one I 1700. \U
88-75-5-------2-Nitrophenol I 1700. \U
105-67-9-------2, 4-Dimethylphenol I 1700. l U
65-85-0-------Benzoic acid I 8400. \U
lll-91-l-------bis(2-Chloroethoxy)methane I 1700. IU
120-83-2-------2, 4-Dichlorophenol ____ -_-l 1700. I U
120-82-1-------1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene I 1700. \U
91-20-3-------Haphthalene ! 1700. I U
106-47-8-------4-Chloroaniline I 1700. IU
87-68-3-------Hexachlorobutadiene I 1700. I U
59-50-7-------4-Chloro-3-methylphenol __ I 1700. IU
91-57-6-------2-Methylnaphthalene I 1700. I U
77-47-4-------Hexachlorocyclopentadiene I 1700. \U
88-06-2-------2,4,6-Trichlorophenol I 1700. \U
95-95-4-------2,4,5-Trichlorophenol I 8400. IU
91-58-7-------2-Chloronaphthalene I 1700. IU
88-74-4-------2-Nitroaniline I 8400. \U
131-11-3-------Dimethylphthalate I 1700. \U
208-96-8-------Acenaphthylene I 1700. I U
606-20-2-------2,6-Dinitrotoluene_____ 1700. \U
----------------------_______ I __ _
FORM I SV-1 1/87 Rev.
2 0 5 .I
lC EPA SAMPLE NO.
SEMIVOLATILE ORG~.NICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
HC079
Contract: 68-W8-0045 Lab Name: IEA
Lab Code: IEA Case No.: 619-80
Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL
Sample wt/vol: 30. 0
SAS No.: SDG No.: HC078
Lab Sample ID:
(g/mL) G
Level: (low/med) LOW
i Moisture: not dee. 81. dee.· ---
Extraction: (SepF/Cont/Sonc) SONC
Lab File ID: 1027409
Date Received: 10/19/89
Date Extracted: 10/23/89
Date Analyzed: 10/27/89
GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) N pH: 6. 0
CAS NO. COMPOUND
Dilution Factor:
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
(ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG
I 99-09-2-------3-Nitroaniline 8400. I U
83-32-9-------Acenaphthcne 1700. IU
51-28-5-------2,4-Dinitrophenol 8400. \U
100-02-7-------4-Nitrophenol 8400. IU
13 2-64-9-------Dibenzofuran 1700. I U
121-14-2-------2, 4-Dinitrotoluene 1700. I U
84-66-2-------Diethylphthalate ______ l 1700. IU
7005-72-3-------4-Chlorophenyl-phenylether I 1700. IU
86-73-7-------Fluorene _________ =I 1700. IU
100-01-6-------4-Nitroaniline _______ l 8400. \U
534-52-1-------4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol I 8400. IU
: 86-30-6-------N-Nitrosodiphenylamine (1)-1 1700. \U
I 101-55-3-------4-Bromophenyl-phenylether -\ 1700. IU
I 118-74-1-------Hexachlorobenzene ----=---1 1700. IU
I 87-86-5-------Pentachlorophenol _____ I 8400. IU
I 85-01-8-------Phenanthrene ________ l 1700. \U
I 120-12-7-------Anthracene __ ~ ______ I 1700. IU
I 84-74-2-------Di-n-butylphthalate ____ I 1700. IU
I 206-44-0-------Fluoranthene ________ l 1700. IU
I 129-00-0-------Pyrene ___________ l 1700. IU
I 85-68-7-------Butylbenzylphthalate ____ ! 1700. I U
I 91-94-1-------3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine ___ l 3400. IU
I 56-55-3-------Benzo( a )anthracene _____ l 1700. I u
I 218-01-9-------chrysene __________ l 1700. IU
! 117-81-7-------bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate I 3000. I
I 117-84-0-------Di-n-octylphthalate ---=---1 1700. IU
I 205-99-2-------Benzo(b)fluoranthene ____ l 1700. IU
I 207-08-9-------Benzo(k)fluoranthene ____ l 1700. IU
I 50-32-8-------Benzo(a)pyrene _______ l 1700. IU
I 193-39-5-------Indeno(l,2,3-cd)pyrene ___ l 1700. IU
I 53-70-3-------Dibenzla,h)anthracene ___ I 1700. IU
I 191-24-2-------Benzo(g,h,i)perylene ____ l 1700. IU
1.00
Q
l-----------'---,----,,--~-,----,--~--.1------1---(1) -Cannot be separated from diphenylamine
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
FORM I SV-2 1/87 Rev.1 2 052
I
I
lF EPA SAMPLE NO.
SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS I
I, HC079
Lab Name: IEA
I Lab Code: IEA
Contract: 68-W8-0045 I ______ _
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Case No.: 619-80 SAS No.:
Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL
Sample wt/vol: 30.0
Level: (low/med) LOW
(g/mL) G
% Moisture: not dee. Bl. dee. --
Extraction: (SepF/Cont/Sonc) SONC
GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) N pH: 6. 0
SDG No.: HC078
Lab Sample ID:
Lab File ID: 1027409
Date Received: 10/19/89
Date Extracted: 10/23/89
Date Analyzed: 10/27/89
Dilution Factor: 1.00
Number TICS found: 20
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
(ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG
I I
CAS NUMBER I COMPOUND NAME I RT EST. CONC. I
I I 1--1. - -!UNKNOWN ALCOHOL I 11. 75 10000. I J 2. - -\UNKNOWN I 14.15 6000. I J 3 . !Substituted Cyclohexane I 14.85 6000. I J
4. - -!UNKNOWN ACID I 16.12 9000. I J
5. -!UNKNOWN J 20.28 10000. I J
6. --!UNKNOWN ALCOHOL I 20.88 2000. I J 7. --!UNKNOWN ALKANE I 21.13 2000. I J
8. --!UNKNOWN I 21.80 1000. I J 9. --\UNKNOWN ALKANE I 22.20 2000 .. J 10. --!UNKNOWN I 22.43 2000. J 11. -\UNKNOWN ACID I 23.97 2000. J 12. --\UNKNOWN I 25.37 1000. J 13. --!UNKNOWN I 31. 35 8000. J 14. --\UNKNOWN ALDEHYDE I 31. 95 20000. J 15. -\UNKNOWN I 36.33 30000. J 16. --\UNKNOWN I 37.53 9000. J 17. --!UNKNOWN I 37.78 10000. J 18. --!UNKNOWN I 39.73 10000. J
19. -!UNKNOWN I 40.45 20000. J
20. --!UNKNOWN I 40.77 70000. J
21. I I 22. I I 23. I I 24. I I 25. I I 26. I I 27. I
28. I
29. I
3 0. I
I
FORM I SV-TIC 1/87
2 053
I
Q I
-I
Rev.
lD EPA SAMPLE NO.
I
I
I
I
I
PESTICIDE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
HC079
Contract: 68-W8-0045 Lab Name: IEA
Lab Code: IEA Case No.: 619-80 SAS No.: SDG No.: HC078
Lab Sample ID: Matrix: (soil/water) SOIL
Sample wt/vol: 30. (g/mL) G
Level: (low/med) LOW
% Moisture: not dee. 81. dee.
Extraction: (SepF/Cont/Sonc) SONC
GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) N pH:
CAS NO. COMPOUND
0.
6.0
Lab File ID: DB5A4861
Date Received: 10/19/89
Date Extracted: 10/26/89
Date Analyzed: 11/ 3/89
Dilution Factor: 1.00
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
(ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/KG Q
I I I
I 319-84-6-----alpha-BHC I 42. IU
I 319-85-7-----beta-BHC I 42. [U
I 319-86-8~----delta-BHC I 42. [U
I 58-89-9-----gamma-BHC I 42. IU
I 76-44-8-----Heptachlor I 42. I U
I 309-00-2-----Aldrin I 42. IU
I 1024-57-3-----Heptachlor epoxide I 42. IU
\ 959-98-8-----Endosulfan I I 42. I U
I 60-57-1-----Dieldrin I 84. \U
I 72-55-9-----4,4'-DDE I 84. IU
\ 72-20-8-----Endrin I 84. I U
I 33213-65-9-----Endosulfan II I 84. \U
I 72-54-8-----4, 4' -DDD I 84. \ U
I 1031-07-8-----Endosulfan sulfate I 84. I U
I 50-29-3-----4,4'-DDT I 84. \U
I 72-43-5-----Methoxychlor I 420. [U
I 53494-70-5-----Endrin ketone I 84. tU
I 5103-71-9-----alpha-Chlordane I 420. [U
I 5103-74-2-----gamma-Chlordane I 420. IU
t 3001-3 5-2-----Toxaphene I 840. tu
I 12674-11-2-----Aroclor-1016 I 420. IU
I 11104-28-2-----Aroclor-1221 I 420. I u
I 11141-16-5-----Aroclor-1232 I 420. IU
I 53469-21-9-----Aroclor-1242 I 420. IU
I 12672-29-6-----Aroclor-1248 I 420. tu
I 11097-69-1-----Aroclor-1254 I 840. I u
I 11096-82-5-----Aroclor-1260 I 840. IU l _____________________ l ______ l __ _
FORM I PEST
,. 3 028
1/87
••
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Rev.1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Lab Name: IEA, INC.
ENVIROFORMS/CLP 788
1.
INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
SAMPLE NO.
HCS079
Date Received: 10/19/89
Matrix (soil/water): SOIL
SDG No.:HCS078
Lab Sample ID: 619-81-2
Level (low/med):
% Solids:
LOW
21. 5
Client ID : FILTER PRESS SLUDGE
Color Before:
Color After:
Comments:
Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg dry weight): MG/KG
I I I I I I I I I I :cAS No. Analyte :concentration c: Q :M :
I I I _, ___ ,_,
7429-90-5 Aluminum 6010 _: L:
7440-36-0 Antimony 3.4 H:N L:
7440-38-2 Arsenic 6.6 H L'
7440-39-3 Barium 576 _ p_
7440-41-7 : Beryllium 1. 9 H L
7440-43-9 :cadmium 19.6 ,_ L
7 440-70-2 : Calcium 6330 : _ L
7440-47-3 _:chromium 109 :_ * L
7440-48-4 :cobalt ----~2210 :_ ,L
7440-50-8_:copper 61.3 :_ P_
7 4 3 9-8 9-6 _ : _,,,I.,,_r_,,o"-'n'----___ _,3,..,1,..,,0 O O O : ... l'_
7 439-92-1 _: 1_ead 28. 0 : _ L
7439-95-4 :Magnesium 1870 :H L
7439-96-5 _:Manganese 64400 :_ L
7439-97-6_:Mercury 0.72 :.!! CV
7440-02-0 :Nickel 630 :_ L
'7440-09-7_:Potassium 507 :.!!, :L
7782-49-2_:selenium 1.7 :.!!:N :L
7440-22-4_:silver 6.9 :.!!: :L
7440-23-5 :sodium__ 2110_:H:E :L
7440-28-0 :Thallium 1. 7 :!Il :L
7440-62-2 :vanadium 18.6 :!l: :L
7440-66-6 :zinc 3790 :_: :L,
:cyanide 0.81 :.!!: :L:
BROWN Clarity Before: Texture: FINE
LT.YELLOW Clarity After: Artifacts: NO
FILTER PRESS SLUDGE
4 003
FORM I -IN 7/88
lA EPA SAMPLE NO. VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
Z HC079 Contract: 68-W8-0045 Lab Name: IEA
Lab Code: IEA case No.: 619-80 SAS No.: SDG No.: HC078
Lab Sample ID: Matrix: (soil/water) WATER
Sample wt/vol: 5.000
Level: (low/med) LOW
(g/mL) ML Lab File ID: 1101308
Date Received: 10/19/89
Date Analyzed: 11/ 1/89 % Moisture: not dee. 100.
Column: (pack/cap) CAP Dilution Factor: 1.00
CAS NO. COMPOUND
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
(ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L
I I I 74-87-3-------Chloromethane _______ [ I 74-83-9-------Bromomethane I I 75-01-4-------Vinyl Chloride J I 75-00-3-------Chloroethane I I 75-09-2-------Methylene Chloride I I 67-64-1-------Acetone _......,,.._-,------~ I 75-15-0-------carbon Disulfide I ------1 75-35-4-------1,l-Dichloroethene I I 75-34-3-------1,l-Dichloroethane I \ 540-59-0-------1,2-Dichloroethene (total) I I 67-66-3-------Chloroform -I I 107-06-2-------1,2-Dichloroethane I I 78-93-3-------2-Butanone I I 71-55-6-------1,l,l-Trichloroethane \ I 56-23-5-------carbon Tetrachloride \ I 108-05-4-------Vinyl Acetate \ I 75-27-4-------Bromodichloromethane \ \ 78-87-5-------1,2-Dichloropropane I [10061-01-5-------cis-l,3-Dichloropropene I I 79-01-6-------Trichloroethene I I 124-48-1-------Dibromochloromethane I I 79-00-5-------1,1,2-Trichloroethane I I 71-43-2-------Benzene I [10061-02-6-------trans-1,3-Dichloropropene I I 75-25-2-------Bromoform I I 108-10-1-------4-Methyl-2-Pentanone I I 591-78-6-------2-Hexanone ________ _,
\ 127-18-4-------Tetrachloroethene
I 79-34-5-------1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
\ 108-88-3-------Toluene I 108-90-7-------Chlorobenzene ______ _ I 100-41-4-------Ethylbenzene _______ _ I 100-42-5-------styrene
I
10. I u
10. [U
10. I u
10. [U
6. I
160. I B
5. [U
5. [U
5. I u
5. I u
5. I u
5. I u
21. I
5. [U
5. I u
10. [U
5. [U
5. I u
5. [U
5. I u
5. \U
5. \U
5. \U
5. [U
5. I u
10. IU
10. [U
5. I u
5. I u
5. IU
5. I u s. I u s. I u
5. I u
Q
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I I 1330-20-7-------Xylene (total) _______
1 I _____________________ _, ______ _, __ -'
I
I
I
I
I
I'
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
FORM I VOA l O 4 S l / 8 7 Rev.
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Lab Name: IEA
Lab Code: IEA
lE
VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS
Contract: 68-W8-0045
Case No.: 619-80 SAS No.:
EPA SAMPLE NO.
Z HC079
Matrix: (soil/water) WATER
SDG No.: HC078
Lab Sample ID:
Sample wt/vol: 5.000 (g/mL) ML Lab File ID: 1101308
Date Received: 10/19/89
Date Analyzed: 11/ 1/89
Level: (low/med) LOW
% Moisture: not dee. 100.
Column:
Number
I
I CAS
I
I l.
I 2.
I 3.
I 4.
I 5.
I 6.
I 7.
I 8.
I 9.
I 10.
I 11.
I 12.
I 13.
I 14.
I 15.
I 16.
I 17.
I 18.
I 19.
I 20.
I 21.
I 22.
I 23.
I 24.
I 25.
I 26.
I 27.
I 28.
I 29.
I 30.
I
(pack/cap) CAP Dilution Factor: 1.00
TICS found: 0
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
(ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L
I
NUMBER I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
COMPOUND NAME RT EST. CONC. Q
I
I ============ ==== ====== == I
I
I
I
I ____________ _, ____ , _____ _, __ !
____________ _, ____ , _____ _, ___ !
-------------___ _, ______ , ___ !
-------------·----______ _, ___ !
I
I ____________ _, ___ _, _____ _, ___ !
_____________ , ___ _, _____ _, ___ !
I
I
I
FORM I VOA-TIC 1/87 Rev.
1 049
lB EPA SAMPLE NO.
SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
T HC079
Contract: 68-W8-0045 Lab Name: IEA
Lab Code : I EA Case No.: 619-80 SAS No.: SDG No.: HC078
Lab Sample ID: Matrix: (soil/water) WATER
Sample wt/vol: 500.0 (g/mL) ML
Level: (low/med) LOW
% Moisture: not dee. 100. dee. ---
Extraction: (SepF/Cont/Sonc) CONT
GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) N pH: 6. 0
CAS NO. COMPOUND
Lab File ID: 1122411
Date Received: 10/19/89
Date Extracted: 10/23/89
Date Analyzed: 11/22/89
Dilution Factor:
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
(ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L
1.00
Q
I l I I
I 108-95-2-------Phenol. ____ ~~-----I 7. I J I
I lll-44-4-------bis(2-Chloroethyl)ether I 10. IU I
I 95-57-8-------2-Chlorophenol. _______ l 10. IU I
I 541-73-1-------1, 3-Dichlorobenzene ____ I 10. I u I
I 106-46-7-------1,4-Dichlorobenzene ____ I 10. IU I
\ 100-51-6-------Benzyl alcohol _______ ! 10. [U I
I 95-50-1-------1,2-Dichlorobenzenc ____ I 10. IU I
\ 95-48-7-------2-Methylphenol __ ~~---I 10. [U I
I 108-60-l-------bis(2-Chloroisopropyl)ether I 10. IU I
\ 106-44-5-------4-Methylphenol _______ l 10. IU I
I 621-64-7-------N-Nitroso-di-n-propylamine_[ 10. I U I
I 67-72-1-------Hexachloroethane ______ l 10. [U I
I 98-95-3-------Nitrobenzene ________ l 10. [U I
\ 78-59-1-------lsophorone _________ l 10. IU I
I 88-75-5-------2-Nitrophenol ---,------1 10. IU I
\ 105-67-9-------2,4-Dimethylphenol _____ l 10. IU I
I 65-85-0-------Benzoic acid~-~-----1. 40. I J I
I lll-91-l-------bis(2-Chloroethoxy)methane I 10. IU I
I 120-83-2-------2, 4-Dichlorophenol _____ l 10. I U I
I 120-82-1-------1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene ___ l 10. IU I
I 91-20-3-------Naphthalene ________ ! 10. IU I
I 106-47-8-------4-Chloroaniline ______ I 10. I U I
I 87-68-3-------Hexachlorobutadiene ____ i 10. IU I
I 59-50-7-------4-Chloro-3-methylphenol __ I 10. IU I
I 91-57-6-------2-Methylnaphthalene ____ I 10. IU I
I 77-47-4-------Hexachlorocyclopentadiene I 10. IU I
I 88-06-2-------2, 4, 6-Trichlorophenol ___ I 10. I U I
I 95-95-4-------2, 4, 5-Trichlorophenol ___ I 50. I U I
I 91-58-7-------2-Chloronaphthalene ____ I 10. I U I
I 88-74-4-------2-Nitroaniline _______ l 50. IU I
I 131-11-3-------Dimethylphthalate _____ I 10. IU I
I 208-96-8-------.l,cenaphthylene _______ l 10. IU I
[ 606-20-2-------2, 6-Dinitrotoluene. _____ l 10. I U I I _____________________ I ______ I __ I
FORM I SV-1 1/87 Rev.
.I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
?. os1 I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
lC EPA SAMPLE NO.
SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
T HC079
Contract: 68-W8-0045 Lab Name: IEA
Lab Code: I EA Case No.: 619-80 SAS No.: SDG No.: HC078
Matrix: (soil/water) WATER Lab Sample ID:
Sample wt/vol: 500.0 (g/mL) ML Lab File ID: 1122411
Level: (low/med) LOW
% Moisture: not dee. 100. dee. __ _
Extraction: (SepF/Cont/Sonc) CONT
Date Received: 10/19/89
Date Extracted: 10/23/89
Date Analyzed: 11/22/89
GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) N
CAS NO.
pH: 6. 0
COMPOUND
Dilution Factor:
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
(ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L
I I I I 99-09-2-------3-Nitroaniline _______ l 50. \U
I 83-32-9-------Acenaphthene ________ l 10. \U
I 51-28-5-------2,4-Dinitrophenol _____ I 50. \U
I 100-02-7-------4-Nitrophenol _______ I 50. IU
\ 132-64-9-------Dibenzofuran ________ l 10. IU
I 121-14-2-------2,4-Dinitrotoluene _____ l 10. IU
I 84-66-2-------Diethylphthalate ______ l 10. IU
I 7005-72-3-------4-Chlorophenyl-phenylether \ 10. IU
\ 86-73-7-------Fluorene _________ -=I 10. IU
I 100-01-6-------4-Nitroaniline _______ l 50. I U
I 534-52-1-------4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol I 50. IU
I 86-30-6-------N-Nitrosodiphenylamine (1)-1 10. IU
I 101-55-3-------4-Bromophenyl-phenylether -\ 10. \U
I 118-74-1-------Hexachlorobenzene ·-I 10. IU
I 87-86-5-------Pentachlorophenol 50. IU
\ 85-01-8-------Phenanthrene 10. I u
I 120-12-7-------Anthracene --------10. IU
I 84-7 4-2-------Di-n-butylphthalate 10. I U
I 206-44-0-------Fluoranthene________ 10. IU
I 129-00-0-------Pyrene __ ~--------10. IU
I 85-68-7-------Butylbenzylphthalate____ 10. \U
I 91-94-1-------3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine.___ 20. IU
I 56-55-3-------Benzo( a) anthracene_____ 10. I U
I 218-01-9-------Chrysene.~~--------I 10. IU
I 117-81-7-------bis(Z-Ethylhexyl)phthalate_[ 10. IU
I 117-84-0-------Di-n-octylphthalate ____ I 10. IU
I 205-99-2-------Benzo ( b) fluoranthene. ____ I 10. I u
I 207-08-9-------Benzo ( k) f luoranthene. ____ I 10. I U
I 50-32-8-------Benzo(a)pyrene. _______ l 10. IU
\ 19 3-3 9-5-------Indeno( l, 2, 3-cd) pyrene ___ I 1 0. \ U
I 53-70-3-------Dibenz(a,h)anthracene ___ I 10. IU
i 191-24-2-------Benzo(g,h,i)perylene. ____ l 10. \U
1.00
Q
I ______________________ I _______ ! __ _
(1) -Cannot be separated from diphenylamine
FORM I SV-2 1/87 Rev.
2 082
lF EPA SAMPLE NO.
SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS
Lab Name: IEA
Lab Code: IEA Case No.: 619-80
Matrix: (soil/water) WATER
Sample wt/vol: 500.0 (g/mL) ML
Level: (low/med) LOW
% Moisture: not dee. 100. dee.
T HC079
Contract: 68-W8-0045
SAS No.: SDG No. : HC078
Lab Sample ID:
Lab File ID: 1122411
Date Received: 10/19/89
--Date Extracted: 10/23/89
Date Analyzed: 11/22/89 Extraction: (SepF/Cont/Sonc) CONT
GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) N pH: 6. 0 Dilution Factor: 1.00
Number TICs found: 8
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
(ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L
I I
I CAS NUMB£.~ I COMPOUND NAME RT EST.
I I I 1. !UNKNOWN ACID _______ _
I 2. I UNKNOWN ACID _______ _
I 3. I UNKNOWN ________ _
I 4 . --I UNKNOWN
8.98
9.15
9.77
9.80
I 5. --!UNKNOWN 11.18 I 6. 103-82-21Benzeneacetic acid. ____ _
I 7. - -I UNKNOWN ________ _ 15.90
16.08
39.33
CONC.
10. J
9. J
10. J
9. J
80. J
100. J
10. J
10. J
Q
I 8. --I UNKNOWN ________ _
I 9 . ______ I _____________ ----------___ , I 10. l ____________ ____J _________ _, ----' I 11. I __________________________ _
I 12. ______ l ____________ _j _________ _, ___ ,
I 13. ______ I _____________ , ____ --------' __ _, I 14 . ______ ! ____________ _, ______________ ,
I 15 . ______ I ____________ _, _____________ -1
I 16 . ______ ! _________________ ------!----'
I 1 7. ______ I _________________ --------' __ _, I 18. ______ I ____________ _, ___________ , __ _
I 19 . ______ I __________________________ _
I 20 . ______ I _____________ , ____ ----------
1 21. ______ l ____________ _, ______________ ,
I 22 . ______ I __________________________ _,
I 23 . ______ I _____________ , ____ , _____ _. __
I 24. ______ I ____________ _, ___ _, _____ _. ___ ,
I 25 ·---~--! ____________ _, ____ , ________ _,
I 26 . ______ I ____________ ____J ___ -1 ______ ----'
I 27. ______ i ____________ _j ____ ------' ----' I 28. ______ I _______________________ _, __ _
I 29 . ______ I _____________ -------------
1 30 . ______ ! _____________ ------------
1 ! _____________ --------------'
FORM I SV-TIC 1/87 Rev.
I
11
I
I
I
I
I
l1
I
I
I
I
I j
I
I
I
I
I
2 oa3 I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
lD EPA SAMPLE NO.
PESTICIDE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
T HC079 Lab Name: IEA
Lab Code: IEA
Contract: 68-W8-0045
Case No.: 619-80
Matrix: (soil/water) WATER
Sample wt/vol: 500. (g/mL)ML
Level: (low/med) LOW
% Moisture: not dec.100. dee. 0.
Extraction: (SepF/Cont/Sonc) CONT
SAS No.: SDG No.: HC078
Lab Sample ID:
Lab File ID: DB5A4986
Date Received: 10/19/89
Date Extracted: 11/ 3/89
Date Analyzed: 11/22/89
GPC Cleanup: (Y/N) N pH: 6.0 Dilution Factor: 1.00
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
CAS NO. COMPOUND (ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L Q
I I I I 319-84-6-----alpha-BHC I .050 [U
I 319-85-7-----beta-BHC I .050 [U I 319-86-8-----delta-BHC I .050 [U
I 58-89-9-----gamma-BHC I .050 IU I 76-44-8-----Heptachlor I .050 [U I 309-00-2-----Aldrin I .050 [U
I 1024-57-3-----Heptachlor epoxide I .050 [U I 959-98-8-----Endosulfan I I .050 [U
I 60-57-1-----Dieldrin I .10 IU
I 72-55-9-----4,4'-DDE I .10 [U I 72-20-8-----Endrin I .10 IU I 33213-65-9-----Endosulfan II I .10 IU I 72-54-8-----4,4'-DDD I .10 IU
I 1031-07-8-----Endosulfan sulfate I .10 IU I 50-29-3-----4,4'-DDT I .10 IU I 72-43-5-----Methoxychlor I .50 IU I 53494-70-5-----Endrin ketone I .10 [U I 5103-71-9-----alpha-Chlordane I .50 [U
I 5103-74-2-----gamma-Chlordane I .50 IU
I 8001-35-2-----Toxaphene I 1.0 [U
I 12674-11-2-----Aroclor-1016 I .50 IU
I 11104-28-2-----Aroclor-1221 I .50 IU I 11141-16-5-----Aroclor-1232 I .50 IU I 53469-21-9-----Aroclor-1242 I .50 [U
I 12672-29-6-----Aroclor-1248 I .50 IU I 11097-69-1-----Aroclor-1254 I 1.0 [U
I 11096-82-5-----Aroclor-1260 I 1.0 IU I I I
3 034
FORM I PEST 1/87 Rev.
Lab Name: IEA, INC.
ENVIROFORMS/CLP 788
1
INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET I I
I I
I
SAMPLE NO.
HCT079
'------
Date Received: 10/19/89
Matrix (soil/water}: WATER
SDG No.:HCS078
Lab Samole ID: 619-81-2T
Level (low/med}: LOW Client ID: TCLP-F.P.SLUDGE
% Solids: 0.0
Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg dry weight}: UG/L
CAS No.
I I
: Analyte
I I I
' < I :concentration:c: Q
I I
M : -----•.,..-,---,---_______ ,_ ---
7429-90-5 :Aluminum 162 :11 L
7440-36-0 'Antimony 2.0 :11 L
7440-38-2 Arsenic 1.0 111 ___ L
7440-39-3 Barium 2870 : ____ L
7 440-41-7 Beryllium 2. 3 : ~ L
7440-43-9 Cadmium 4. 7 :11 ___ L
7440-70-2 Calcium 37400 _, ___ L
7440-47-3 Chromium 93.6 _:=N ___ L
7440-48-4 Cobalt 381_Q_ _: ___ L,
7440-50-8 Copper -----=1_.4_,_.-"6-11: ___ .L:
,7439-89-6 Iron 274 __ : ____ ~-:
7439-92-1 Lead 1.0 11 ___ .r_:
7439-95-4 Magnesium 11900 .L:
7439-96-5 ',Manganese 269000 'P ' -___ ,_,
7439-97-6 :Mercury 0.20 11 :cv:
7440-02-0 :Nickel 1120 ___ :L:
7440-09-7 :Potassium ____ .._41-=.5o"-:~ ___ :.L:
7782-49-2 :selenium 2.0 :11,N :.r_:
7440-22-4 :silver 39.7 :_:N :.L:
, 7440-2_3.=._5_: Sodi~ 1360000 : : ____ : p :
:7440-28-0 :Thallium 2.0 :!l: ___ :.r_:
:7440-62-2 :vanadium 26.0 :11: ___ :.L:
l7440-66-6 :ziric 3420 :_: ___ :.L:
_____ :cyanide 10.0 :11: ___ :~:
Color Before: COLORLESS
Color After: COLORLESS
Clarity Before: CLEAR
Clarity After: CLEAR
Texture:
Artifacts:
Comments:
TCLP-F.P.SLUDGE
4 004
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
FORM I -IN 7 /8el
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
5050H190
APPENDIX IV
OUTER TIER
INFLUENT/EFFLUENT WATER QUALITY
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
OUTER TIER
Influent
Influent TDC (mg/l)
Influent TOX (mg/l)
Influent Conductivity (ll4hos)
Influent pH
Influent COO (mg/ll
Influent TSS (mg/l)
Air Stripping Tower
Effluent Stripping TDC (mg/l)
Carbon Filter
Carbon Effluent TOC Cmg/l)
Carbon Effluent TOX (mg/l)
Effluent Conductivity (Lf1hos)
Effluent pH
Effluent coo (mg/l)
Effluent BOO (mg/ l)
Effluent TSS (mg/l)
% Removal TDC Effluent
% Removal TOX Effluent
% Removal coo Effluent
11/1
484
6.21
10.00
437
8.02
3
0.60
3.00
70.00%
HC/Shelby Water Quality Data -System Startup
11/2
17.00
0.96
6.19
9.50
1.10
93.53%
100.00X
11/3
6.15
11/4 11/5 11/6
6.10 6.15 6.02
% Removals are relative to influent values
11/7
6.13
OUTER T !ER
Influent
Influent TOC (mg/l)
Influent TOX (mg/l)
Influent Conductivity CU"!hos)
Influent pH
Influent COO (mg/l)
Influent TSS (mg/l)
Air Stripping Tower
Effluent Stripping TOC (mg/l)
Carbon Filter
Carbon Effluent TOC (mg/l)
Carbon Effluent TOX (mg/l)
Effluent Conductivity (uMhos)
Effluent pH
Effluent COO (mg/ l)
Effluent BOO (mg/ l >
Effluent TSS (mg/l)
X Removal TOC Effluent
% Removal TOX Effluent
X Removal coo Effluent
HC/Shelby Water Quality Data· System Startup
11/8
5.99
7.36
25
0.40
11/9
13.00
5.93
8.20
6.90
46.92¾
11/10 11 /11
5.97 6.01
% Removals are relative to influent values
11/12 11/13
5.98 6. 12
I
I
11/14 I
5.92 I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
OUTER TIER
Influent
Influent TOC (mg/l)
Influent TOX (mg/l)
Influent Conductivity Cl.14hos)
Influent pH
Influent COO (mg/l)
Influent TSS (mg/l)
Air Stripping Tower
Effluent Stripping TOC (mg/l)
Carbon Filter
Carbon Effluent T0C (mg/l)
Carbon Effluent TOX (mg/l)
Effluent Conductivity ('-"'hos)
Effluent pH
Effluent COO (mg/l)
Effluent BOO (mg/l)
Effluent TSS (mg/l)
¾ Removal TOC Effluent
% Removal TOX Effluent
X Removal coo Effluent
HC/Shelby Water Quality Data -System Startup
11/15
5.90
7.56
10
0.70
11 /16
27.00
6.21
2.80
6.10
77.41%
11/17 11 /18
6.09 6.01
% Removals are relative to influent values
11/19 11/20
5.88 6.02
11/21
6.25
HC/Shelby ~ater Quality Data -System Startup
CXJTER TIER
Influent 11/22 11/23 11/24 11/25 11/26 11/27 11/28 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------.. ------. --
Influent TOC (mg/l)
Influent TOX (mg/l)
Influent Conductivity (uMhos}
Influent pH
Influent COO (mg/I)
Influent TSS (mg/I)
Air Stripping Tower
47.00
6.13 6.15 6.12 6. 10
Effluent Stripping TOC (mg/l) 6.30
Carbon Filter
Carbon Effluent TOC (mg/l)
Carbon Effluent TOX (mg/l)
Effluent Conductivity (utithos}
Effluent pH
Effluent coo (mg/I)
Effluent BOO (mg/l)
Effluent TSS (mg/l)
% Removal TOC Effluent
% Removal TOX Effluent
X Removal COO Effluent
2.30
7.63
20
0.30
95 .11%
% Removals are relative to influent values
6.15 6.16 6.13
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
OUTER TIER
Influent
Influent TOC (mg/l)
Influent TOX (mg/l)
Influent Conductivity (lJolhos)
Influent pH
Influent coo (mg/l)
Influent TSS (mg/l)
Air Stripping Tower
Effluent Stripping TOC (mg/l)
Carbon Filter
Carbon Effluent TOC (mg/l)
Carbon Effluent TOX (mg/l)
Effluent Conductivity (uMhos)
Effluent pH
Effluent COO (mg/l)
Effluent BOO (mg/l)
Effluent TSS (mg/l)
% Removal TOC Effluent
% Removal TOX Effluent
% Removal COO Effluent
11/29
6.23
7.63
4
0.50
HC/Shelby Water Quality Data -System Startup
11/30
6.30
4.50
4.70
25.40%
% Removals are relative to influent values
OUTER TIER
Influent
Influent TOC (mg/l)
Influent TOX (mg/l)
Influent Conductivity (l.tlhos)
Influent pH
Influent COO (mg/l)
Influent TSS (mg/ll
Air Stripping Tower
Effluent Stripping TOC (mg/l)
Carbon Filter
Carbon Effluent TOC (mg/l)
Carbon Effluent TOX (mg/l)
Effluent Conductivity (uMhos)
Effluent pH
Effluent COO (mg/l)
Effluent BOO (mg/l)
Effluent TSS (mg/l)
% Removal TOC Effluent
% Removal TOX Effluent
% Removal COO Effluent
HC/Shelby Water Quality Data -System Startup
12/1 12/2 12/3 12/4
6.19 6.16 6.21 6.21
% Removals are relative to influent values
12/5
6.18
12/6
442
6.16
10.00
422
7.69
20
0.60
4.00
12/7
6.50
0.04
6.11
4.90
2.70
0.02
58.46%
62.79%
I
I
I
I
.I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
OUTER TIER
Influent
Influent TDC (mg/l)
Influent TOX (mg/l)
Influent Conductivity (u4hos)
Influent pH
Influent coo Cmg/l)
Influent TSS (mg/I)
Air Stripping Tower
Effluent Stripping TOC (mg/l)
Carbon Filter
Carbon Effluent TDC (mg/l)
Carbon Effluent TOX (mg/l)
Effluent Conductivity (lJ4hos)
Effluent pH
Effluent COO (mg/l)
Effluent BOD (mg/l)
Effluent TSS (mg/l)
X Removal roe Effluent
X Removal TOX Effluent
X Removal COO Effluent
HC/Shelby Water Quality Data -System Startup
12/8 12/9 12/10 12/11
6.37 6.07 6.05 6.24
X Removals are relative to influent values
12/12
6.27
12/13
6.24
7.46
5
0.50
12/14
3.90
6.21
4.70
5.90
OJTER TIER
Influent
Influent TOC (mg/l)
Influent TOX (mg/l)
Influent Conductivity (t.li!hos)
Influent pH
Influent COO (mg/l)
Influent TSS (mg/l)
Air Stripping Tower
Effluent Stripping roe (mg/I)
Carbon Filter
Carbon Effluent roe (mg/I)
Carbon Effluent TOX (mg/l)
Effluent Conductivity (uMhos)
Effluent pH
Effluent COO (mg/I)
Effluent BOO (mg/ I)
Effluent TSS (mg/I)
% Removal TDC Effluent
X Removal TOX Effluent
X Removal coo Effluent
HC/Shelby ~ater Quality Data -System Startup
12/15 12/16 12/17 12/18 12/19 12/20
6.46 6.27 6.30 6.19 6.10 6.16
7.45
25
0.50
% Removals are relative to influent values
12/21
14 .00
6.28
6.40
4.20
70.00%
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
OUTER TIER
Influent
Influent TOC (mg/l)
Influent TOX (mg/l)
Influent Conductivity (~hos)
Influent pH
Influent COO (mg/l)
Influent TSS (mg/l)
Air Stripping Tower
Effluent Stripping TOC (mg/l)
Carbon Fi l ter
Carbon Effluent TOC (mg/l)
Carbon Effluent TOX (mg/l)
Effluent Conductivity (U'lhos)
Effluent pH
Effluent COO (mg/l)
Effluent BOO (mg/l)
Effluent TSS (mg/l)
% Removal TDC Effluent
¾ Removal TOX Effluent
¾ Removal coo Effluent
HC/Shelby Water Quality Data· System Startup
12/22 12/23 12/24 12/25 12/26 12/27
6.02 6.19 6.23 6.10 6.31 6. 10
7.22
5
0.20
¾ Removals are relative to influent values
12/28
17
6.04
3.4
2.7
84.12%
OUTER TIER
Influent
Influent TDC (mg/l)
Influent TOX (mg/l)
Influent Conductivity (l.tlhos)
Influent pH
Influent coo (mg/l)
Influent TSS (mg/l)
Air Stripping Tower
Effluent Stripping TDC (mg/l)
Carbon Filter
Carbon Effluent roe (mg/ll
Carbon Effluent TDX (mg/l)
Effluent Conductivity (l.tlhos)
Effluent pH
Effluent COO (mg/l)
Effluent BOO (mg/l)
Effluent TSS (mg/l)
% Removal TDC Effluent
% Removal TDX Effluent
% Removal COO Effluent
HC/Shelby Water Quality Data -System Startup
12/29 12/30 12/31
6.10 6.24 6.31
% Removals are relative to influent values
I
11
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
OUTER TIER
Influent
Influent TOC Cmg/l)
Influent TOX (mg/l)
Influent Conductivity (1.14hos)
Influent pH
Influent COO (mg/l)
Influent TSS (mg/l)
Air Stripping Tower
Effluent Stripping TOC (mg/l)
Carbon Filter
Carbon Effluent TOC (mg/l)
Carbon Effluent TOX (mg/l)
Effluent Conductivity (L14hos)
Effluent pH
Effluent COO Cmg/1)
Effluent BOO (mg/ I)
Effluent TSS (mg/I)
% Removal TOC Effluent
% Removal TOX Effluent
% Removal coo Effluent
HC/Shelby Water Quality Data -System Startup
1/1 1/2 1/3 1/4
6.22 6.18 6.35 6.45
7.66
10
% Removals are relative to influent values
1/5
9.00
0.02
6.50
4.7
5.20
0.03
42.22%
1/6
6.26
1/7
6.23
OJTER TIER
Influent
Influent TDC (mg/l)
Influent T0X (mg/l)
Influent Conductivity (lJ.lhos)
Influent pH
Influent COO (mg/l)
Influent TSS (mg/l)
Air Stripping Tower
Effluent Stripping TDC (mg/l)
Carbon Filter
Carbon Effluent T0C (mg/l)
Carbon Effluent T0X (mg/l)
Effluent Conductivity (t.li!hos)
Effluent pH
Effluent COO (mg/l)
Effluent BOO (mg/ L)
Effluent TSS (mg/l)
% Removal TOC Effluent
% Removal TOX Effluent
% Removal coo Effluent
HC/Shelby Uater Quality Data· System Startup
1/8 1/9
6.07 6.76
1/10
425
6.10
10.00
423
7.50
5
0.50
5.00
50.00%
1/11
12.00
6. 12
5.0
2.50
79.17%
% Removals are relative to influent values
1/12 1/13
6.25 5.95
1/14
6.08
I
I
I
I
I
I I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
OUTER TIER
Influent
Influent TDC (mg/l)
Influent TOX (mg/l)
Influent Conductivity (llthos)
Influent pH
Influent COO (mg/l)
Influent TSS Cmg/l)
Air Stripping Tower
Effluent Stripping TOC (mg/l)
Carbon Filter
Carbon Effluent TDC (mg/l)
Carbon Effluent TOX (mg/l)
Effluent Conductivity (ll'lhos)
Effluent pH
Effluent coo (mg/l)
Effluent BOO (mg/l)
Effluent TSS (mg/l)
% Removal TDC Effluent
% Removal TOX Effluent
% Removal COO Effluent
HC/Shelby Water Quality Data -System Startup
1/15 1/16
5.98 6.01
1/17
6.02
7.51
20
0.50
1/18
5.80
6.09
3.3
2.40
58.62¾
% Removals are relative to influent values
1/19 1/20
6.11 6.07
1/21
6.18
CXJTER TIER
Influent
Influent TOC (mg/l)
Influent TOX (mg/l)
Influent Conductivity (ui!hos)
Influent pH
Influent coo (mg/l)
Influent TSS (mg/l)
Air Stripping Tower
Effluent Stripping TOC (mg/l)
Carbon Filter
Carbon Effluent TOC (mg/l)
Carbon Effluent TOX (mg/l)
Effluent Conductivity (uMhos)
Effluent pH
Effluent COO (mg/l)
Effluent BOO (mg/l)
Effluent TSS (mg/l)
% Removal TOC Effluent
% Removal TOX Effluent
% Removal COO Effluent
HC/Shelby ~ater Quality Data -System Startup
1/22
6.18
1/23
6. 11
1/24
6.03
7.25
20
1.50
1/25
5.00
6.08
4.0
1. 70
66.00¾
% Removals are relative to influent values
1/26 1/27
6.09 6.07
I
I
1/28 I
6.16 I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
OUTER T !ER
Influent
Influent TDC (mg/l)
Influent T0X (mg/l)
Influent Conductivity (U'lhos)
Influent pH
Influent COO (mg/l)
Influent TSS (mg/l)
Air Stripping Tower
Effluent Stripping T0C (mg/l)
Carbon Filter
Carbon Effluent roe (mg/ll
Carbon Effluent T0X (mg/l)
Effluent Conductivity (I.Jllhos}
Effluent pH
Effluent COO (mg/l)
Effluent BOO (mg/l)
Effluent TSS (mg/l)
% Removal T0C Effluent
% Removal T0X Effluent
% Removal COO Effluent
1/29
6. 15
HC/Shelby Water Quality Data -System Startup
1/30
6.72
0.60
1/31
6.11
7.62
20
% Removals are relative to influent values
-------------------Outer Tier TOC Influent vs. Effluent 100.00r T 100.00% * * * * * ** * t90.00% * "-.. * * * tS0.00% * * ~ j I 0 ....___ 0 Cl> * t70.00% E 0 ~ 10.00 * ~ ..... 0 0 ~ C 0 0 60.00% ~ (l) 0 * * :::, 0 * 0 0 ;;::: * 0 0 -.... l4 > w 0 0 cP 0 50.00% E o1! * 0 * 0 0 0 0 0 (l) ..... 0 * 0 0 Cl:'. C * * 0 u (l) 40.00% :::, 0 0 0 -.... 0 0 I-C 1.00 0 0 * u t 30.00% 0 * I-* t20.00% 10.00% * 0.10 0.00% 8/1 10/1 12/1 1 /31 -TOC Influent · 0 · TOC Effluent · * · TOC Removal %
Outer Tier pH 10.00 9.00 0 0 0 s.oot 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7.oot 0 0 0 I r 0.. 6.00 5.00 4.00 3.00+-------------J'--------------+----------------J 8/1 10/1 12/1 1 /31 Outer Tier Influent · O · Outer Tier Effluent -------------------
I
Ir
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
(
[ /coNOUCTIVITY
I DATE I !/MONTH I 1st. WED. :
i I 1/it-l :
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12 !
13
i
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30 }lo s. . -~
I
I
' '-184 AVG. ' :
81GB
LOW
MONTH tv• • 1 ti A rt "--J.-
pff [ coo I 800
DAILY! 1/MONTB I/MONTH
1 lst.WBD lst.WBO.
i
( I ,"J,./ : lo L/, '2--
t,,11
',/ C"
{.. Ji
/. J .,,...l..-
1.,02--
I.' I~
ie,. ~~
5.9J
5.9?
~,(;/
s: 9.i'l
It.}, i
' !.s-; q?
.r::::qi
I., ,"2../
6,09
6.A I
S:9i
~.02-
I-').~
&,/$
,t,/5
t.J z.
,,/6 ,.,,
I,. I~
It. /-?;
(,.13 -
i '
,08' Io J-/.'l.... • In. 1 r:,
-~.gg i i
MONTH -~t-V~lcll~-· _ YB A It _d_J.-1
! iCONDUCTIVITY pH I COD BOD ! TSS NHJN P04 I I I DATE ! I/MONTH I /WK. i I/WK. I/WEEK j 1/MONTR I/MONTH I /MONTH ,
i I lat. WED. WED. I WED. WED. lat.WED. lat.WED. lat.WED. ! . .--i I t-/37 io~ t).3 O,b 03 , ~ ·It/ ~.C)~ i .
2
3 ~
4
5 i--
6
7 --8 7..:JL ") c-o,f! ' -.-9
lD
11
12
13
14
15 J.f'i,. /0 (),?
16 i
17
18
19
20
21
22 1, l,J "2-t> 0' "?,
23
24
25
26
27
i 28 ' i
I 29 7.&] O'f IJ.~
! 30 I ' i i I ! I '
1 AVG. I J../.7/7 7.lotl' Id-! ('J,c; I /) (, ! (),ft/ () ,tJ/.,
' '
HIGH I 8.o~ ~i,-I (). '7 i i '
LOW i 11~ 03 ! o.~ ! i
I
I !
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I CONDUCTIVITY
DATE !/MONTH
lat. WED.
1
2
3
4
5
6 '-I-<./-2-
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
AVG. Jfi/ 'J-.
HIGH
LOW
MONTH ...., C: C> YEAR ~
' pH COD BOD I
DAILY !/MONTH !/MONTH l
ls t. WED 1st.WED.
t,/9
f .1/. . '
Ir, • ,2../
t. 2-{
1,.18
I.,/(, /t) o, r:
t, JI
1..11
J,;l)fj ,.oS
1...2-t/
fa.1... '"J
!.,_-,,/,
t.2..( . -
~ -Ji.
t. ::i.t7
l, "2~
~./9
t,10
/..,/(,,
~.z.a
~,OJ-1,.,,, ,.,-3
t.10
{,. "?I
I.,/~
I,. Di/-
I,, 10
J..Jti_
(. , "J, I
1,'h lo ~.5
,.JJ/,
,.01--
CONDUCTIVITY pH COD I BOD TSS I NHJN I P04 l
DATE I/MONTH !/WK. I/WK. I !/WEEK !/MONTH !/MONTH !/MONTH 1
lat. WBD. WBD. WBD. WBD. lat.WBD, i lst.WBD.' 1st.WED. i
' ' l i
2
3
4
5
6 L/-2-2-
7, '"
.20 0' (. "f , t:) 'I-.5~
7
8
9
10
11
12
13 '7.J.J/, AS-b,
14
15
16
17
18
19
20 7.t/7 -'LS t),§
21 -.-
22
23 .-
24
25' .-
26
27 1. 2,.]; 5 0. "'2-.-
28 -a-29
30
31
AVG. '-I?-~ ?.t/? 14 ! ~-r::; 4 ,ot/ ,5'd--
HIGH ~s I O,h i
LOW oc; I o.v .
I
I (
I
I
I
I
I
I
I • (
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
(
CONDUCTIVITY
DATB I/MONTH
lat. WED.
I
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10 '/-2~
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
AVG. 1../tf,.5
BIGB
LOW
... ____ -:..·
' pH COD BOD i
DAILY I/MONTH !/MONTH I l ■t.WBD lat.WED.
, • 2.2
1,,/i
',J.I'
L ;,_c -~.$'"
/., t.L
I., 7_;!
l,,"7
t... '11..
' 1,,/4 I tJ /, 7
~-fl-'-
~.2$
S:1~')
t&i .
S.'II
!..al
/,.1)1,,,
I.. A~ • . ,,/1
l,.tJ7
(,,Ii
1,.11
I. JI
' '/.. "'2
' ,.08
l,.o'I
11.b1
/,. , II
,.1$
,.11,,,
£. JI ,.,s lo I .7
&,7J
5.?5 ,
l"IV"1n -~---161\&1 .,___
CONDUCT! V !TY pH coo BOO TSS NHJN P04
DATE !/MONTH l/WK. l/WK. !/WEEK !/MONTH !/MONTH !/MONTH
lot. WHO. WHO. WED. WHO. lat.WHO. lat.WHO. lat.WED.
( I
2
3 1. t(, /b
4
5
6
7
8
9 ~ --
10 7,->-' 5 .s I L/-2.3 o..s '' /7 . 5 t)
11 " ,
', ./ . -----12
13 .-
14
15 .--
( 16
17 7.~I 2.0 0. C: i-
18
19 .--
20 -.-21
22 .-23
24 1-z 1C '-.:26 J.S
25
26
27
28
29
30
31 1,I..L ~" ii'
AVG. '-lit3 ?.51 15 ,f-os O,I? {),c;o
HIG8 ?,GI ~ If .,
LOW 9.:6 os "'
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
5050H190
APPENDIX V
OUTER TIER
INFLUENT/EFFLUENT CLP WATER QUALITY
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Client Sanple I .D.#:
IEA Assigned EPA#:
Date saq>le red:
Saq>le Matrix:
Contract No.: 68-WS-0045
Date Reported:
TARGET COMPOUNDS/ANALYTES
VOA TARGETED COMPOUNDS (ug/l)
Methylene Chloride
Acetone
Carbon Disulfide
1,2-Dichloroethene (total)
2-Butanone
Trichloroethene
Benzene
2-Hexanone
Chlorobenzene
8/N TARGETED COMPOUNDS (ug/L)
Benzyl Alcohol
Oi-n-butylphthalate
ACID EXTRACTABLE COMPOUNDS (ug/L)
Phenol
2-Chlorophenol
4-Methylphenol
Benzoic Acid
PESTICIDES (ug/l)
Aldrin
PCBs (ug/l)
(none detected)
METALS (ug/l)
Alllllinun
Antimony
Arsenic
Bariun
Cadniun
Calciun
Chromillll
Cabal t
Copper
Iron
Lead
Magnesiun
Manganese
Nickel
Potassiun
Silver
Sodiun
Thalliun
Vanadiun
Zinc
TCL, TAL and TIC COMPOUNDS/ANALYTES
DETECTED IN INFLUENT/EFFLUENT SAMPLES
HC/SHELBY, N.C.
WESTINGHOUSE PROJECT: 4124·85-0SOD
#1: Outer
Tier Coot>.
Influent
HCS072
10/09/89
WATER
(not run)
(not run)
(not run)
(not run)
(not run)
( run for
Cr only)
#7: Outer
Tier
Effluent
HCS074
10/09/89
WATER
(not run)
(not run)
(not run)
(not run)
(not run)
(run for
Cr only)
#1: Outer
Tier Coot,.
Influent
HC083
11/03/89
WATER
11/22/89
60 B
(not run)
(not run)
(not run)
(not run)
(run for
Cr only)
#7: Outer
Tier
Effluent
HC085
11/03/89
WATER
11/22/89
(not run)
(not run)
(not run)
(not run)
(run for
Cr only)
Revised 2/1/90
I
TCL, TAL and TIC COMPOUNDS/ANALYTES I
DETECTED IN INFLUENT/EFFLUENT SAMPLES
HC/SHELBY, N. C. I WESTINGHOUSE PROJECT: 4124·85·D50D
#1: Outer #7: Outer #1: Outer #7: Outer
Tier Coob. Tier Tier Cocrb. Tier I Client Sa[Rle 1.0.#: Influent Effluent Influent Effluent
IEA Assigned EPA#: HCS072 HCS074 HC083 HC085
Date sa""le red: 10/09/89 10/09/89 11/03/89 11/03/89
Sa~le Matrix: WATER WATER WATER WATER I Contract No.: 68·W8·0045
Date Reported: 11/22/89 11/22/89
TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS I
VOA NON-TARGETED COMPOUNDS ~ uslll Substituted Formic Acid (not run) (not run) I Ethanol
2-Methyl-Propanol
Butanal
Unknown
2-Propyl Furan I Unknown Acetic Acid Ester
Unknown Butanoic Acid Ester
n-Butyl Acetate
Unknown
Substituted Formic Acid I Substituted Acetic Acid
Tetrahydro-Furan
Substituted Propane
Substituted Butanoic Acid I Unknown
Unknown
Tri methyl Si lanol
Substituted Formic Acid
Ethanol (ACN) I Methyl Ester Acetic Acid
Substituted Propane
Substituted Butanoic Acid
Substituted Butanoic Acid I Substituted Butanoic Acid
Unknown
Substituted Formic·Acid
Substituted Propane
Substituted Butanoic Acid I Substituted Acetic Acid
Unknown
Ethenyl Ester Formic Acid
Unknown Hydrocarbon
I 1-Chloro-2-Methyl Propane
Ethyl Ester Butanoic Acid
Acetic Acid Butyl Ester
1-Hexanol
Unknown Hydrocarbon I Unknown
Butanol
Unknown
2-Methyl Propanoic Acid
Pentanoic Acid I Unknown Alcohol 7 J Unknown 10 J
Unknown 4 J
Unknowri 9 J I BNA NON-TARGETED COMPOUNDS ~u9Lq Butanoic Acid (not run) (not run) (not run) (not run)
3-Methyl Butanoic Acid I
Revised 2/1/90 I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Client Sarrple 1.0.#:
IEA Assigned EPA#:
Date S8fll)le red:
Saq,le Matrix:
Contract No.: 68-WS-0045
o8te Reported:
1,4-Butanediol
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Substituted Benzyl Alcohol
Phenyl-Propanedioic Acid
Unknown
Benzenepropanoic Acid
Ethyl-Benzoic Acid
Unknown
2-Methylpropyl Benzoic Acid
Unknown
Unknown Aromatic
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown Hydrocarbon
Substituted Cyclohexane
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown Hydrocarbon
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown Alkane
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
* Except metals received 08/18/89
TCL, TAL and TIC COMPOUNOS/ANALYTES
DETECTED IN INFLUENT/EFFLUENT SAMPLES
HC/SHELBY, N.C.
WESTINGHOUSE PROJECT: 4124-85-050D
#1: Outer
Tier Coob.
Influent Hcson
10/09/89
WATER
#7: Outer
Tier
Effluent
HCS074
10/09/89
WATER
#1: Outer
Tier Coob.
Influent
HC083
11/03/89
WATER
11/22/89
#7: Outer
Tier
Effluent
HC085
11/03/89
WATER
11/22/89
Revised 2/1/90
Client Sarrple I.D.#:
IEA Assigned EPA#:
Date sarrple red:
SSIIl)le Matrix:
Contract No.: 68-~8-0045
Date Reported:
TARGET COMPOUNDS/ANALYTES
VOA TARGETED COMPOUNDS (ug/Ll
Methylene Chloride
Acetone
Carbon Disulfide
1,2-Dichloroethene (total>
2-Butanone
Trichloroethene
Benzene
2-Hexanone
Chlorobenzene
B/N TARGETED COMPOUNDS (u9/ll
Benzyl Alcohol
Oi-n-butylphthalate
ACID EXTRACTABLE COMPOUNDS (ug/l)
Phenol
2-Chlorophenol
4-Methylphenol
Benzoic Acid
PESTICIDES (ug/L)
Aldrin
PCBs (ug/L)
(none detected)
METALS (ug/l)
Al uni nun
Antimony
Arsenic
Bariun
Cadniun
Calciun
Chromiun
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
Lead
Magnesiun
Manganese
Nickel
Potassiun
Silver
Sodi un
Thalliun
Vanadiun
Zinc
TCL, TAL and TIC COMPOUNDS/ANALYTES
DETECTED IN INFLUENT/EFFLUENT SAMPLES
HC/SHELBY, N.C.
~ESTINGHOUSE PROJECT: 4124-85-DSOD
#1: Outer
Tier Coot,.
Influent
HCS109
12/08/89
~ATER
(not run)
(not run)
(not run)
(not run)
(not run)
C run for
Cr only)
#7: Outer
Tier
Effluent
HCS110
12/D8/89
~ATER
(not run)
(not run)
(not run)
(not run)
(not run)
(run for
Cr only)
#1: Outer
Tier Cooi:>.
Influent
HCS118
1/08/89
WATER
(not run)
(not run)
(not run}
(not run)
(not run)
(run for
Cr only)
#7: Outer
Tier
Effluent
HCS1.19
1/08/89
WATER
(not run)
(not run)
(not run)
(not run)
(not run)
( run for
Cr only)
Revised 2/1/90
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I TCL, TAL and TIC COl!POUNOS/ANALYTES
DETECTED IN INFLUENT/EFFLUENT SAMPLES
HC/SHELBY, N.C.
I WESTINGHOUSE PROJECT: 4124-85-0500
#1: Outer #7: Outer #1: Outer #7: Outer
Tier Cont>. Tier Tier Comb. Tier
I Client Sa!!lJ2Le J.D.#: Influent Effluent Influent Effluent
IEA Assigned EPA#: HCS109 HCS110 HCS118 HCS119
Date sarrple red: 12/08/89 12/08/89 1/08/89 1/08/89
Sa~le Matrix: WATER WATER WATER WATER
I Contract No.: 68-W8-0045
Date Reported:
I TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COl!POUNOS
VOA NON-TARGETED COMPCN.JNDS !uslq
Substituted Formic Acid (not run) (not run) (not run) (not run)
I Ethanol
2-Methyl-Propanol
Butanal
Unknown
2-Propyl Furan
I Unknown Acetic Acid Ester
Unknown Sutanoic Acid Ester
n-Butyl Acetate
Unknown
Substituted Formic Acid I Substituted Acetic Acid
Tetrahydro-Furan
Substituted Propane
Substituted Butanoic Acid
I Unknown
Unknown
Trimethyl Si lanol
Substituted Formic Acid
Ethanol (ACN)
I Methyl Ester Acetic Acid
Substituted Propane
Substituted Butanoic Acid
Substituted Butanoic Acid
I Substituted Butanoic Acid
Unknown
Substituted Formic Acid
Substituted Propane
Substituted Butanoic Acid
I Substituted Acetic Acid
Unknown
Ethenyl Ester Formic Acid
Unknown Hydrocarbon
I 1-Chloro-2-Methyl Propane
Ethyl Ester Butanoic Acid
Acetic Acid Butyl Ester
1-Hexanol
Unknown Hydrocarbon
I Unknown
Butanol
Unknown
2-Methyl Propanoic Acid
Pentanoic Acid
I Unknown Alcohol
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
I BNA NON-TARGETED COMPOUNDS {ugLq
Butanoic Acid (not run) (not run) (not run) (not run)
3-Methyl Butanoic Acid
I
I Revised 2/1/90
Client Sarrple I.D.#:
IEA Assigned EPA#:
Date sa"l)le red:
Salll)le Matrix:
Contract No.: 68·W8·0045
Date Reported:
1,4-Butanediol
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Substituted Benzyl Alcohol
Phenyl·Propanedioic Acid
Unknown
Benzenepropanoic Acid
Ethyl-Benzoic Acid
Unknown
2-Methylpropyl Benzoic Acid
Unknown
Unknown Aromatic
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown Hydrocarbon
Substituted Cyclohexane
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown Hydrocarbon
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown Alkane
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
* Except metals received 08/18/89
TCL, TAL and TIC COMPOUNDS/ANALYTES
DETECTED IN INFLUENT/EFFLUENT SAMPLES
HC/SHELBY, N.C.
WESTINGHOUSE PROJECT: 4124·85·050D
#1: Outer
Tier Cont>.
Influent
HCS109
12/08/89
WATER
#7: Outer
Tier
Effluent
HCS110
12/08/89
WATER
#1: Outer
Tier Comb.
Influent
HCS118
1/08/89
WATER
#7: Outer
Tier
Effluent
HCS119
1/08/89
WATER
Revised 2/1/90
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Lab Name: IEA, INC.
Lab Code: IEA
ENVIROFORMS/CLP 788
1
INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
Contract:
Case No.: SAS No.:
Matrix (soil/water): WATER
SAMPLE NO.
HCS072
I Level (low/med):
% Solids:
LOW
0.0
SDG No. : HCS068
Lab Sample ID: 619-74-5
Date Received: 10/09/89
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg dry weight): UG/L
I I I I I
I l I t I
:cAS No. : Analyte Concentration:c Q :M :
I I I I I ' ______ , ------------' -' -' :7429-90-5 lAluminum :_ t_N_R:
:7440 36-0 :Antimony :_ tNR:
: 7440-38-2 Arsenic :_ :_N_R:
'7440-39-3 Barium :_, ___ :NR:
7440-41-7 Beryllium :_: :NR:
7440-43-9 Cadmium _: NR:
7440-70-2 Calcium NR:
7440-47-3 Chromium 5. 4 !I ___ L:
7440-48-4 Cobalt NR:
7440-50-8 'Copper NR:
7439-89-6 Iron NR:
7439-92-1 Lead NR:
7439-95-4 Magnesium ,NR:
7439-96-5 Manganese NR:
7439-97-6 Mercury NR:
7440-02-0 Nickel NR:
,7440-09-7 Potassium NR:
:7782-49-2 Selenium NR:
:7440-22-4 Silver NR:
: 7440-23-5 Sodium ' :NR:
:7440-28-0 Thallium ==============:= ======:NR: :7440-62-2 ,Vanadium _______ : ____ :NR:
:7440-66-6 :zinc _______ : ____ :NR:
______ :cyanide _______ : ____ :_N_R:
Texture: l:olor Before: COLORLESS
1:olor After: COLORLESS
:omments:
Clarity Before: CLEAR
Clarity After: CLEAR Artifacts:
I 1 007
I FORM I -IN 7/88
ENVIROFORMS/CLP 788
1
SAMPLE NO.
INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
Lab Name: IEA, INC.
Lab Code: IEA Case No.:
Matrix (soil/water): WATER
Level (low/med): LOW
% Solids: 0.0
contract:
SAS No.:
HCS074
SDG No. : HCS068
Lab Sample ID: 619-74-7
Date Received: 10/09/89
Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg dry weight): UG/L
CAS No.
7429-90-5
7440-36-0
7440-38-2
7440-39-3
7440-41-7
,7440-43-9
:7440-70-2
:7440-47-3
:7440-48-4
:7440-50-8
:7439-89-6
7439-92-1
7439-95-4
7439-96-5
7439-97-6
7440-02-0
7440-09-7
7782-49-2
7440-22-4
7440-23-5
7440-28-0
7440-62-2
7440-66-6
Jlor Before: COLORLESS
)lor After: COLORLESS
)mments:
I I I I I I I I I Analyte :concentration:c: I
I I I I ,_,
:Aluminum I I ,_,
:Antimony I ' ,_,
:Arsenic I I ,_,
:Barium I I ,_,
:Beryllium I I ,_,
:cadmium I I ,_,
:calcium I I ,_,
:chromium 5.4 : !l: :cobalt I I ,_,
'coi;rner I I ,_,
Iron I I ,_
Lead I ,_
Magnesium I ,_
Manganese I ,_
Mercury I ,_
Nickel I ,_
,Potassium I ,_
:selenium I ,_
:silver I ,_
:sodium I ,_
:Thallium I ,_
:vanadium I ,_
:zinc I '-:cyanide I ,_
Clarity Before: CLEAR
Clarity After: CLEAR
I I I ' Q 'M I
I
I _,
NR:
NR:
NR:
NR
,NR
'NR '-:NR
lL
:NR
:NR
:NR,
INRI
'NR' ,_
'NR ,_
'NR ,_
:NR
:NR
'NR ,_
:NR
:NR
:NR
:NR
:NR
:NR
Texture:
Artifacts:
1 009
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
FORM I -IN 7 /88 I
I
I
I
I
lA EPA SAMPLE NO.
"lOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
HC083
Lab Name: IEA Contract: 68-WB-0045
Lab Code: IEA Case No.: 619-85 SAS No.:
Matrix: (soil/water) WATER
SDG No.: HC0B0
Lab Sample ID:
'.,ample wt/vol: 5.000 (g/mL) ML
I Level: (low/med) LOW
Lab File ID: lll4C08
Date Received: 11/ 3/89
I\ b ,~'2l&"f
Date Analyzed: -rtr/15/89
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
% Moisture: not dee. 100.
Column: (pack/cap) CAP Dilution Factor: 1.00
CAS NO. COMPOUND
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
(ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L
74-87-3-------Chloromethanc
74-83-9-------3romomethane _______ _
75-01-4-------Vinyl Chloride ______ _
75-00-3-------Chloroethane _______ _
75-09-2-------Methylene Chloride ____ _
67-64-1-------Acetone
75-15-0-------carbcn Disulfide _____ _
75-35-4-------1,1-Dichloroethene ____ _
75-34-3-------1,1-Dichloroethane ____ _
540-59-0-------1,2-Dichloroethene (total)
67-66-3-------Chloroform ·---------107-06-2-------l,2-Dichloroethane ____ _
78-93-3-------2-Butanone ________ _
71-55-6-------1,1,1-Trichloroethane
56-23-5-------Carbon Tetrachloride
108-05-4-------Vinyl Acetate ----
75-27-4-------Bromodichloromethane ___ _
: 78-87-5-------1,2-Dichloropropane
110061-01-5-------cis-l,3-Dichloropropenc
I 79-01-6-------Trichloroethene
I 124-48-1-------Dibromochloromethane ----1 79-00-5-------1,1,2-Trichloroethane
I 71-43-2-------3enzenc
\10061-02-6-------trans-l,3-Dichloropropene
\ 75-25-2-------Bromoform
108-i0-l-------4-Methyl~2:.Pentanone ___ _
591-78-6-------2-Hexanone ________ _
127-18-4-------Tetrachloroethene
!
I
I
I
I
I
79-34-5-------1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane _I
108-88-3-------Toluene I 108-90-7-------Chlorobcnzene ______ _ I 100-41-4-------Ethylbenzene _______ _
100-42-5-------Styrene _________ _ I
I 1330-20-7-------Xylene (total) ______ _
10.
10.
10.
10 . s.
60. s. s. s.
5.
a• s.
10.
5.
C J.
10. s. s .
5.
) .
5.
5. s.
5.
" ., .
10.
10. s. s. s.
5. s.
5.
C ".
FORM I VOA 3 0 3 G
Q
iU
\U
\U
iU
\U
IB
IU
IU
IU
\U
IU
IU
iU
IU
IU
iU
\U
\U'
iU
IU :u
\U :u
\U
!U
IU
\U
IU
iU
IU
\U
\U :u
\U
1/87 Rev.
lE EPA Shl1PLE NO.
'iOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS
Contract: 68-W8-0045
HC083 Lab Name: IEA
l.ab Code: IE.A Case No.: 619-85 SAS No.: SDG No.: HC080
Lab Sample ID: c·1atrix: (soil/water) WATER
Sample •.,i:/vol: 5.000
Level: (low/med) LOW
\ Moisture: not dee. 100.
Column: (pack/cap) CAP
Number TICs found: 2
C.'.S NUMBER
tg/mL) ML
COMPOUND NAME
Lab File ID: lll4C08
Date Received: 11/ 3/89
,, 1, ,~:::ai\
Date Analyzed: -Hr/15/89
Dilution Factor:
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
(ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L
RT EST.
1.00
CONC. Q : ·---------------: !-----; I UNKNOWN ALCOHOL 7.50 7. J
-- I UNKNOWN -------'-----11. 87 10. J 3. ______ I _________________ ----------
4. I ____________ _, ____ -------.'---
s. 1.,..-----------------______ _i __ _
6. I -------------7. ! _____________ --------------
8. ! _____________ --------------
9. ! _____________ --------------
10. I _____________ --------------
11. ! ____________ _, --------------
12. ______ --------------------------'---' , c,. ______ --------------------------
14. --------------------------------
13. ______ --------------------------. (
!..,) • --------------------------------
1.7. --------------------' -------------i.S. I _______ _
1. '). I ______ : ---20. ! _______ _
.,1. ------------------____ ! ______ , __
'" -------------------------'I _____ _. --
1 23. ! _______ _
24. ! ________ _
25. I _______ _
26. I _______ _
27. J _____ _j __
28. ! _______ _
29. .I _______ _
30. I _______ _
----------------------____ ! ______ ---
FORM I './QA-TIC 1/87 Rev.
3 037
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
ENVIROFORMS/CLP 788
1
INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
Contract:
SAMPLE NO.
HCS083 Lab Name: IEA, INC.
Lab Code: IEA Case No.:
Matrix (soil/water): WATER
Level (low/med):
% Solids:
LOW
0.0
SAS No.: SDG No.: HCS080
Lab Sample ID: 619-86-4
Date Received: 11/03/89
Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg dry weight): UG/L
I I I I I I I I I I I I
'CAS No. : Analyte :concentration:c: Q lM
I I I I
"7,...4_2_9 ___ 9""0.,....._-=-5-i ..,A-l-um---,i,...n_um __ -------; = i---;-N-R
7440-36-0 lAntimony :_: lNR
7440-38-2 :Arsenic :_• lNR
7440-39-3 Barium :_ lNR
7440-41-7 Beryllium l_ :NR,
7440-43-9 Cadmium l_ lNR
7440-70-2 Calcium l_ lNR
7440-4 7-3 Chromium 4 .1 : .!! : L
7440-48-4 Cobalt l_ lNR
7 440-50-8 Copper : _ : NR
7439-89-6 Iron l_ lNR
7439-92-1 Lead l_ lNR
7439-95-4 Magnesium· :_ lNR
7439-96-5 Manganese : _ : NR
7439-97-6 'Mercury :_, lNR
7 440-02-0 Nickel l _ l NR
7440-09-7 Potassium :_ :_NR_
7782-49-2 Selenium :_ : NR
7440-22-4 Silver l_ :NR
7440-23-5 Sodium l_ lNR
7440-28-0 Thallium :_ lNR,
7440-62-2 :vanadium :_ :NRl
7440-66-6 l Zinc l_ lNR:
______ : Cyanide : _ : NR:
I Color Before: COLORLESS Clarity Before: CLEAR Texture:
I
I
I
Color After:
Comments:
CLIENT ID=
COLORLESS Clarity After: CLEAR Artifacts:
# 4 OUTER TIER COMB. INFLUENT
FORM I -IN 7/88
lA EPA SAMPLE NO. \'OLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
HC085 Lab Name: IEA
c..ab Code: IEA
Contract: 68-WB-0045
Case No.: 619-85 SAS No.: SDG No.: HC080
Lab Sample ID: Matrix: (soil/water) WATE.~
Sample wt/vol: 5.000 (g/mLl ML Lab File ID: lll4Cl0
Date Received: 11/ 3/89 Level: (low/med) LOW
\\ 1,1~·~13, % Moisture: not dee. 100.
Column: (pack/cap) CAP
Date Analyzed: Hl/15/89
Dilution Factor: 1. 00
CAS NO. COMPOUND
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
(uq/L or ug/Kg) UG/L
74-87-3-------Chloromethane 10. IU 7 4-83-9-------!lromomethane 10. l U -,--------75 -

0

l

-

4

-

-

-

-

-
--Vinyl Chloride_______ 10. [U 75-00-3-------Chloroethane I 10. [U 75··09-2-------Methylene Chloride I 5. [U 67-64-1-------Acetone I 10. [U 75-15-0-------carbon Disulfide I 5. I u 75-35-4-------1,l-Dichloroethene I 5. iU 75-34-3-------1, 1-Dichloroethane I 5. I U 540-59-0-------1,2-Dichloroethene (total)_[ 5. [U 67-66-3-------Chloroform I 5. !1J 107-06-2-------1,2-Dichloroethane I 5. 1u 78-93-3-------2-Butanone I 10. [U 71-55-6-------1,1,1-Trichloroethane 5. JU 56-23-5-------Carbon Tetrachloride____ S. I u
Q
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
J
I
I
I
J
I 108-05-4-------Vinyl Acetate 10. IU i 75-27-4-------Bro:nodic::loromethane 5. I u I I 78-87-5-------1,2-Dichloropropane ----S. ',U J [10061-01-5-------cis-l,J-Dichloropropene 5. iU I 79-01-6-------Trichloroethene 5. I U I 124-48-1-------Dibromochloromethane____ 5. [U I 79-00-5-------1,1,2-Trichloroethane 5. :U I
1 71-43-2-------aenzene ~-:u I !10061-02-6-------trans-l,3-Dichloropropene S. IU I I 75-25-2-------Bromoform "· IU I I 108-10-1-------4-Methyl-2-Pentanone____ 10. !U I I 591-78-6-------2-Hexanone_________ 10. [U I I 127-18-4-------Tetrachloroethene 5. IU I I 79-34-5-------1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane "· [U I I 108-88-3-------Toluene 5. [U I I 108-90-7-------Chlorobenzene 5. i U I 100-41-4-------Ethylbenzene 5. I U I --------100 -42 -

5

-

-

-

-

-

-

-
Styrene S. '.U I 1330-20-7-------Xylene (total)_______ 5. JU I
------------------------------___ I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
FORM I VOA • 3 o&,i87 Rev. I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Lab Name: IEA
La.b Code: IEA
lE
VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS
Contract: 68-W8-0045
Case No.: 619-85 SAS No.:
EPA SAMPLE NO.
HC085
;,!atrix: (soil/water) WATER
SDG No.: HC080
Lab Sample ID:
Sample wt/vol: S.000 (g/mL) ML
Level: (low/med) LOW
% Moisture: not dee. 100.
column: (pack/cap) CAP
Nwnber TICS found: 2
CAS NUMBER COMPOUND NAME ===============-[
l . --I UNKNOWN
Lab File ID: 1114C10
Date Received: 11/ 3/89
\\ b1.1~•i''l:
Date Analyzed: ~/15/89
Dilution Factor:
CONCENTRATION UNITS:
(ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L
RT EST.
5.62
CONC.
4.
1.00
Q
----· 1----·
J 2. i UNKNOWN ________ _ 11. 85 9. J ]. ______ ! _________________ ----------4. ______ I _________________ , _______ _ s. ______ 1 _____________
1
___________ , __ _ 6. ______ I ____________ _, ___________ _
I. ______ ! _____________ --------------8. ______ I ____________ --! _____________ _ J. ______ I _____________ , _____________ _
10. ______ I _____________ --------------11. ______ ! _____________ --------------! 12. ______ I _____________ --------------1" •-_____ I _________________ , ______ , __
l~. ---------------------------'---------'---' l :, . ------I i t~: --------------------------------13. l':J.------
I
I
I
I
I
I
-------------20. ______ --------------____ , ______ , __
4~. ------______________ , ____ --------
22. ______ ------------------______ , __ -, "
~J. ------------------------------__ _j 21. ____________________ , _____________ ,
25. ------______________ , ------------,6. --------------------------------27. --------------------------------23. ------______________ , _____ , ----------
29. ______ --------------------------
30. ______ --------------'----------:--
FORM I VOA-TIC 1/87 Rev.
3 065
i<Cv i, ,v;t_d I
"""' ENVIROFORMS/CLP 788 I SAMPLE NO. 1
INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET \I HCS085 Contract: I
I
Lab Name: !EA, INC.
Lab Code: !EA case No.: SAS No. : SDG No. : HCS0801
Matrix (soil/water):·WATER
Level (low/med): LOW
Lab Sample ID: 619-86-6
Date Received: 11/03/89 I
% Solids: 0.0
Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg dry weight): UG/L
I I I I I I I I I I CAS No. : Analyte :concentration:c: Q :M I I I I I I -,------'------'-------•-·---'-' 7429-90-5 ',Aluminum ' ' ' ,'NR', , _______ ,_, __ _
7440-36-0 ', Antimony ' ' ' ,' NR' -, _______ ,_, __ _
7440-38-2 ',Arsenic ' 1 1 'NR '-------1-1 1_ 7440-39-3 !Barium :_ :_N_R 74'40-41-7 !Beryllium :_ :NR 7440-43-9 :cadmium :_ :NR 7440-70-2 :calcium :_ NR 7440-47-3 :chromium 4.1 :Y L 7440-48-4 :cobalt :_ NR 7440-50-8 :copper :_ NR 7439-89-6 :rron :_ NR, 7439-92-1 :Lead :_ NRl 7439-95-4 : Magnesium : _ : NR: 7439-96-5 : Manganese : _ : _N_R: 7 439-97-6 : Mercury : _ : NR: ,7440-02-0 lNickel :_, lNRl :7440-09-7 :Potassium :_ :NRl : 7782'-49-2 : Selenium : _ : NR: :7440-22-4 :silver :_ JNR :7440-23-5 :sodium :_ :NR : 7 440-28-0 : Thallium : _ : NR : 7440-62-2 :vanadium :_ :NR :7440-66-6 :zinc :_ :_N_R ______ : Cyanide : _ : NR
Color Before: COLORLESS
Color After: COLORLESS
Clarity Before: CLEAR
Clarity After: CLEAR
Texture:
Artifacts:
Comments:
CLIENT ID=# 7 OUTER EFFLUENT
FORM I -IN 1 008
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I Lab Name: INC.
ENVIROFORMS/CLP 788
1
INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
Contract:
SAMPLE NO.
HCS109
I ,_ab Code: Case No.
Matrix (soil/water): WATER
I Level !low/med): LOW
SAS No. SDG No.: HCS103
.Lab Samele ID: 619-103-7
Date Received: 12/08/89
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I Jlor Before:
I .:,!or C.ft2r:
.:.11menls:
0.0
Concentration
:cAS No.
;7429-ClO-S
:7440-36-0
;7440~38-2
:7440-39-3
:7440-41-7
:7440-43-9
;7440-70-2
7440-47-3
7440-48-4
7440-50-8
7439-89-6
7439-92-1
7439-95-4
:7439-Cl6-5
::439-0 7-6
;7440-02-0
:7440-0Q-7
;7782-4Q-2
:7440-2'.2-4
:7440-23-5
;7440-?8-0
:7440-62-2
;7440-66-6
COLORLESS
,:OLORLESS
Units (ug/L or mg/kg dry weight):
' ' Analyte :concentration:c: Q
' ' ;Aluminum
;Antimony
!Arsenic
]Barium
:Beryllium
;cadmium
:calcium
;chromium
:cobalt
:copper
:rron
;Leaa
;Maanesium
Manganese
Mercu r\1
Nicv.el
Potassium
~elenium
Silver
1 Sodium
!ihallium
: \1anaaium
:zinc
:cvaniC:e
Clarity Before:
Clarity After:
' ' ,_,
' ' ,_,
' ' ,_,
' ' ,_,
,_,
' ' ,_,
' ' ,_,
' ' ,_,
4.1 ; ~: N
' ' ,_,
' ' ,_,
,_,
,_,
,_,
:_1
' ' 1_;
1-l
' ' ,_,
,_,
' ' ,_,
,_,
' ,_,
' ,_,
' ' ,_,
' '_,
CLEAR
CLEAR
I CLIENT !D=•l OUTER TIER COMB HI FLUENT
I
UG/L
:M
;NR;
'NR' ·-' :NR: :NR:
1 NR 1 ,_,
:NR:
'. NR:
'p ' ,_,
:NR;
; NR;
'.NR;
'NR' ,_,
'NR' ,_, :NR:
I ~JR I ·-'
I ~~R I ,_,
'trn' ,_, :NR:
INR 1 ,_,
: t:IB.;
'NR' ,_,
; :~P_ :
I i~R I ,_,
'NR' ,_,
Texture:
Artifacts:
1 OOR
ENVIROFORMS/CLP 788
1
INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
Contract:
SAMPLE flO.
HCSllO Lab Name: IEA, INC.
:_3b Code: IEA Case No.
Matrix (soil/water): WATER
Level (low/med): LOW
SAS No.: SDG No.: HCS103
Lab Samele ID: 619-103-8
Date Receivea: 12/08/89
0.0
Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg dry weight): UG/L
:cAS No.
:7429-00-5
:7440-~6-0
:7440-.38-2
:7440-39-3
:7440-41-7
;7440-43-0
:7440-70-?
:7440-47-3
:7440-48-4
: 7440-50-.~
:7439-89-6
'7439-02-1
7439-0 5-4
7439-96-5
7439-0 "7-6
7440-02-0
7440-09-7
7782-49-2
7440-'??-4
7440-2:0-5
,7440-28-0
:7440-62-~
;7440-66-6
Analyte
;Aluminum
;Antimony
;Arsenic
:sarium
:Beryllium
;cadmium
:calcium
;chromium
:cobalt
:copper
;rron
;Lead
;Magnesicm
;Manaanese
1 Mercur-.,
fhckel
Potassium
Selenium
Silver
Sodium
,Thallium
:vanaaium
;zinc
_______ : Cyanide
' ' ' ' ' :concentration:c; Q
' _________ , _, ____ , _,
_________ 1 _; ____ ; NR; _________ 1_; ;NR;
_________ ; _: ;NR; _________ ;_: :NR: _________ ;_; :NR: _________ :_; ;NR: _________ :_: :NR:
_______ 4'-'-• .,.___; \J: N : e_: _________ ;_: :NR;
_________ 1 _; ; NR :
_________ , _, ____ : NR;
_________ , _, ____ ; NR;
_________ ; _: ! NR;
_________ ; _; : NR :
_________ 1 _: ____ ; NR: _________ i_: ;NR;
_________ , _, ____ ; NR;
_________ , _, ____ ;NP.; _________ :_; :NR;
_________ , _, ____ : NR: _________ ;_: :NR:
_________ , _, ____ : NR;
_________ 1 _; : ~~R : _________ 1_: ;NR:
:lor Before: COLORLESS Clarity Before: CLEAR Texture:
,lor After: r;QLORLESS r;1arity After: CLEAR Artifacts:
Jmments:
CLIENT ID= a7 OUTER EFFLUENT
1 009
cCIRM I -HI 7/33
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
ENVIROFORMS/CLP 788
1
INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
Contract:
SAMPLE NO.
HCS118
Lab Name: IEA, INC.
Lab Code: IEA Case No.:
Matrix (soil/water): WATER
Level (low/med): LOW
SAS No.: SDG No. : HCS113
Lab Sample ID: 619-116-6
Date Received: 01/08/90
% Solids: 0.0
Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg dry weight): UG/L
I I I I I I
I I I t I I
lCAS No. : Analyte :concentration Cl Q :M:
I 1 l I I , _____ , _____ -------_, ___ ,_,
: 7429-90-5 lAluminum ___ :.!:IB.
l7440-36-o :Antimony ___ :.!:IB.
7440-38-2 :Arsenic ___ l.!:IB.
7440-39-3 :Barium _______ , ____ :NB.
7440-41-7 :Beryllium _______ :_ l.!:IB.
7440-43-9 : cadmium _______ :_ : NR
7440-70-2 :calcium _______ :_ l.!:IB.
7440-47-3 :chromium ____ .....;,;4.._ . ...._:.Q lR....
7440-48-4 :cobalt _______ :_ .!:IB.
7440-50-8 :copper _______ :_ .!:IB.
7 4 3 9-8 9-6 : _.I...,r..,.o"'n'----_______ : _ .!:IB.
7 4 3 9-9 2-1 : _..L.,.e.,.a"'d'----_______ : _, NR
7439-95 4 :Magnesium _______ :_: NR
7439-96 5 lManganese _______ :_: .!:IB.
: 7439-97-6 :Mercury _______ :_: NR
l7440-02-0 :Nickel _______ :_: .!:IB.
l7440-09-7 :Potassium _______ :_: NR
: 7782-49-2 : selenium _______ ' _: .!:IB.
7440-22-4 :silver _: .!:IB.
7440-23 5 :sodium _: .!:IB.
7440-28-0 : Thallium _: .!:IB.
7440-62-2 :vanadium _: NR
7440-66-6 : Zinc _: NR _____ : Cyanide _: NR
1 olor
Color
Before: COLORLESS
After: COLORLESS
Clarity Before: CLEAR
Clarity After: CLEAR
Texture:
Artifacts:
I omments:
CLIENT ID= #1 OUTER INFLUENT
I
I
FORM I -IN 7/88
ENVIROFORMS/CLP 788
1.
SAMPLE NO.
INORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
HCS119
Contract: Lab Name: IEA, INC.
Lab Code: IEA case No.:
Matrix (soil/water): WATER
Level (low/med): LOW
SAS No.: SDG No. : HCS113
Lab Sample ID: 619-116-7
Date Received: 01/08/90
% Solids: 0.0
Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg dry weight): UG/L
I I I I
l I I I :cAs No. : Analyte :concentration:c
I I I , _____ , ____________ ,_ Q
I I :M
: 7429-90-5 :Aluminum :_ N.B.
: 7440-36-o :Antimony : ____ NR
:7440-38-2 :Arsenic ' NR
:7440-39-3 :Barium NR
'7440-41-7 :Beryllium N.B.
7440-43-9 :cadmium NR,
7440-70-2 :calcium NR
7440-47-3 :chromium 4.1 Q ___ :1:_
7440-48-4 :cobalt :.HR
7440-50-8 'Copper :N.B.
743 9-89-6 _..I..,r_,.o"'n.__ _________ :-, ---: NR
7439-92-1 Lead :.HR
7 4 3 9-9 5-4 "'M""a"g""n'--e-s_i_u_m_ -------' =: ====== : N.B.
7439-96-5 Manganese ________ : ___ :NR
7439-97-6 Mercury ' :NR
7440-02-0 Nickel :.HR
:7440-09-7 Potassium :NR
:7782-49-2 ,Selenium :NR
:7440-22-4 :silver :NR
:7440-23-5 :sodium :.HR
:7440-28-0 :Thallium =============:= ======:NR :7440-62-2 :vanadium _______ : ____ JNR 1
:7440-66-6 :~z£iun~c ___ -------:-___ :NR: _____ : Cyanide _______ , ____ : NR:
Jlor Before: COLORLESS
· :olor After: COLORLESS
Clarity Before: CLEAR
Clarity After: CLEAR
Texture:
Artifacts:
Jmments:
CLIENT ID= #7 OUTER EFFLUENT
FORM I -IN 7/88
1 008
I I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I APPENDIX VI
PIEZOMETER BORING LOGS
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I 5050H190
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
a: Ill a, X :::, z
z :::, a:
1
2
3
4
Westinghouse
Environmental Services
VISUAL CLASSIFICATION OF ROCK
PROJECT NAME ~H~C~C~-~S~he~l~b~y ____ _ PROJECT NUMBER 4122-B5-0SOL
APPROX ELEV FIELD ENG/GEO D. Humphris
CORE SIZE NG (i.75 in.)
RIG TYPE Mobile B-57
0 >-Ill ffi :,; a: 0 .... .., Ill > C!I it ~ > 0 a: 0 u 0 u Ill .. Ill a: a: ..
10
20
30 3.8 77 22
40 8.2 82 34
50 9.9 99 65
60 8.7 87 58
Ill ..J H u.. 0 a: Cl.
. ,, .. . .
~ a.
~ a ...
,i; ,, • •. .
DRILLING METHOD ~C~o~r~e _____ _
WEATHER Sunny & warm
DESCAIPTI ON
RESIOUUM; brown to red: send • fine to v.
fine: some s!lt: trace clay:
micaceous.
~ 2-mica, amphibole, trace
ul ~ ..J
ffi .... ~
garnet: sugen: slightly to mostly
broken, slight to moderate '¥
weathering, pyritization and chlor
itization along fractures, local granitic texture up to 4 in thick.
v. broken
unbroken
leucocratic, granitic tex-
ture. weathered garnets to 49'
heavy Fe stains at fracture v. broken/soft at 50'& 52'
leucocratic, granitic texture to 61'
BORING TERMINATED Al 64 FT.
PAGE 1 Of 1
BORING NO: Piezo 5A
DATE: 4/22/89
WELL DIAGRAM
'.[:=) ... -... ···-··· ··•-•,• ·=-·= :\ /{
::: -::: . ... -.. · ···-··· ·=-·=
:l iJ
ffi ~
2
z ::, a:
1
2
3
Westinghouse
Environmental Services
VISUAL CLASSIFICATION OF ROCK
PROJECT NAME _JH~C~C~-~Sh~e~l~bLy ____ PROJECT NUMBER 4122-85-050L
FIELD ENG/GEO D. Humphr!s APPROX ELEV _________ _
CORE SIZE NG (1.75 in.I DRILLING METHOD -=.Co~r~e~-----
RIG TYPE Mobile 857 WEATHER Sunny Swarm
:c ,-.µ il; ...
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
ffi
i5 " "' a:
iil
ffi > 0 " "' a: ..
a C, a: ..
5.5 55 22
3.5 70 64
8 80 31
"' _J ....
~ a: a.
DESCRIPTION
RfSIQUUM; tan to brown: sand, fine to v.
fine: some silt: trace clay:
micaceaus.
!llJABIZ; b!ot!te. trace garnet: augen:
MQNZ□NITf broken to unbroken, v. slight
ta macferate weathering, esp.
along fractures. also with Fe
stains.
mostly unbroken. fresh rock
mostly v. broken rock. gneissic
texture with melano-and leuco-
cratic layers up to 4•.
BORING TERMINATED AT 65 FT.
PAGE 1 OF 1
BORING NO: Plaza 58
DATE: 4/22/89
WELL DIAGRAM
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
a: "' CD :,: ::, z
z ::, a:
Westinghouse
Environmental Services
VISUAL CLASSIFICATION OF ROCK
PROJECT NAME ~HC=C~-~S~h~e=lb~y~----PROJECT NUMBER 4122-85-050L
FIELD ENG/GEO □. Humphris APPROX ELEV ________ _
CORE SIZE DRILLING METHOD ~H~S~A _____ _
RIG TYPE Mobile B-57 HEATHER Sunny & warm
0 UJ >-a: :,; a: UJ 0 ,-., "' > "' il:; ~ > 0 a: 0 tJ 0 tJ "' .. "' a: a: ..
f--
f-.
f-.
f-.
f--10 -
f-.
f-.
f-.
f-.
f--20 -
r .
"
r .
r
f--30 -
"
"
f-.
f-.
f--40 -
f-.
f-.
f-.
f-.
f--50 -
f-.
f-.
" -
" -
f--60 -
f--
-
-
-
-70 -
"' ...J ...
LL 0 a: 0..
,. ,. '! _;,,
151:<-.. •q a_ '-~.
~ ·. ,-.
,}, ~-
1~ ~-•·. •• ;.
15 ·":
~ a • -~ . . .
,; ;.-,·. • •
,,.
I"·. •·p .... '! := 1_1; ~
~ a_ ..
·""r~
~ •, ,-.
l .q_ ,-
14 ~-•·. ,;..
15 ·': --~
~ a_ • ,. .
,; ;! ,-.
~-·. ~-
I~~-•·. ,;,
15 :--; -~
~ a_ .. -~.
~;.-,-. ,-. ·. •·. Ii ~-.. "' 15 :";
~ a_ . ~ -~.
~;.-;:'.). r ~ ~-l .': I" .. •·.
... '! .= I.'-·";
~ a .. ~-. . ~-r; a:;·.
Ii ~: ~-
Ii · . •·. .... '! ,;.
l_'I: :-;
~ d ..
"< _-,.~. ~-. ~;.-~-~•: •·. ,: ~ ,~
DESCRIPTION
RESIDUUM;buff to tan: sand. fine to v. fine: some silt: trace clay: micacecus: probable parent rock
quartz monzonite.
rock not encountered
BORING TERMINATED AT 65 FT.
ul ~ ...J
ffi ,-
1
PAGE 1 OF 1
BORING NO: Piezo BA
DATE: 4/!B/89
WELL DIAGRAM
·-· •,• . ' : ·.-_.
... ·-· . ' : -":
)
·-· -.: : ·.-_. ·.-.:
... ..
·.-.:=(:
.
.
~
= .
! -§_
~
-µ! : --.
.
-
.
.
.
.
-
-
-
.
.
.
-
.
.
.
.
-
a: UJ a, :,: :::, z
z :::, a:
Westinghouse
Environmental Services
VISUAL CLASSIFICATION OF ROCK
PROJECT NAME HCC-Shelby
FIELD ENG/GEO □. Humphris
CORE SIZE
PROJECT NUMBER 4122-85-0SOL
APPROX ELEV
DRILLING METHOD ~H~S~A~-----
HEATHER Sunny & warm RIG TYPE Mobile B-57
::c ,-.., it ~
C
L .
L
L
~ 10 -
L
L
L
~ 20 -
L.
L.
L.
L 30 -
L. .
L. .
L. .
L. .
· '-40 -
L. '
L. '
L. '
L. '
'-50 -
L
RESIQUUM;buff to tan: sand, fine to v.
fins: some silt: trace clay:
micaceous.
PAGE 1 OF 1
BORING NO: P!ezo 6B
DATE: 4/17/89·
WELL DIAGRAM
.. ~ = ~ &, !l .
~ a-~ . ~-J :
• C. .
'
-
.
'
.
'
-
.
. ,,
i .
! -
~
;) ;;;
·.· -:,•
'
'
'
{(i \j -
.
. ... -:.· L
L. '
L 60 -
L. auger refusal at 62_ft_. _______ -!-+----'~L....-"~")-'---''."-f": -.i.. __
.
-
L. •
L.
L.
.
.
L 70 -
BORING TERMINATED AT 62 FT. .
.
'
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
@ Westinghouse
Environmental Services
VISUAL CLASSIFICATION OF ROCK
PROJECT NAME HCC-She lb~ PROJECT NUMBER 4122-B5-050L
FIELD ENG/GEO J. Woelfer APPROX ELEV
CORE SIZE NO (1.75 in.) DRILLING METHOD Core
RIG TYPE Mobile B-57 HEATHER Sunn~ 6 warm
a: w >-a, :,: a: ::,: I-.... w ::, (b ~ > z 0
0 u z w ::, a: a:
-
-
-
--
-10 -
-
-
-20 -
--
-
-30 -
I-.
-.
I-.
I-.
~ 40 -
--
I 9.7
1--50 -
-
I-
I-
2 9.5
I-
-60 -
f--1-
I--
I--
- -
-70 -
CJ w a: w w CJ ..J > "' ...
0 a: "-u 0 w .. a: a: CL ..
97
95
DESCRIPTION
llliEISS; 2-mica, amphibole, trace garnet:
augen; slightly broken to mostly
unbroken. moderate to v. slight
weathering. pyritization and chlor
itization occurred along fracture
surfaces. quartzofeldspathic
layers up to 2-3 in thick.
4• quartzofeldepathic layer
1• augene of amphibole common
BORING TERMINATED AT 62 FT.
..J w > w ..J
a: w I-< X
PAGE I OF I
BORING NO: Plaza 7A
CATE: 4/19/B9
HELL DIAGRAM
.-:·: : :
.....
·•:
:_: _ ...
--:-. --;.--.. .-:--: ._::-:·-: :·: -.:-· --: .:---.:·-
---·
.
.
~ ~ • , : . Q a, :!l .
§_
~ C .. -0 . --.
.
-
.
.
-
.
·-
.
-
" m -
i -
• e-Q
-
~ -
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ffi a,
~
~
1
2
3
4
5
llestingl'louse
Environmental Services @
VISUAL CLASSIFICATION OF ROCK
PROJECT NAME HCC-ShelbX
FIELD ENG/GEO J. Woelfer
CORE SIZE NG (1.75 in.J
RIG TYPE Mobile 857
10
20
30
40
50
60
ffi > 0 " :l!
a UJ a: UJ Ei " UJ a: ..
al a: ..
8.8 88 75
10 100 94
9.5 95 83
10 100 82
3.25 65 23
UJ J ... "-0 a: a.
PROJECT.NUMBER 4122-85-050L
APPROX ELEV
DRILLING METHOD Core
WEATHER sunnx & warm
DESCRIPTION
RESIDUUM; brown to red: sand, fine to v. fine: some silt: trace clay:
micaceous.
2-mica, amphibole, trace garnet: augen: broken to mostly unbroken, moderate to v. slight
weathering, pyritization and
chloritizstion occurred along
fracture surfaces. leucocratic quartzofeldspathic layers 2-3'
in. thick.
weathering decreases, fewer
fractures
percentage garnet increases:
common quartzofeldspathic layers
broken zone. severe weathering along fractures, lost circula-tion
iil ii:;
J
a: UJ ... il
PAGE 1 OF 1
BORING NO: Piezo 7B
DATE: 4/18/89
WELL DIAGRAM
last 1.5' core not ,_r,._et,.r_,i,,e,:ve.,d,_ ____ --+-1------------~
BORING TERMINATED AT 65 FT.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I