NCD000813592_19970113_GA-Pacific Corp Hdwd Saw_SERB PA SI_Expanded Site Inspection - Volume II-OCR

-- - - --- - -- -r -
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
REF. 2
LATITUDE AND LONGITUDE CALCULATION l.;QR}',SHE:ET 12
LI USING ENGINEER'S SCALE (1/60)
AK.A: SSID: --------------------------------·-----
ADDRESS: __ __,p'-'-,/,,..t-'--""-~..c."_d __ T::>_,_;_..,_e. _______________________ _
CITY: ----'-c-,;,l,_i ,.__Y_~_"_..,_f'_i,, ______ _ ZIP CODE: 2 7962 STATE: __ N_L-__ _ ----------
SI TE REFER.EN CE PO I NT: --"lt~p:LP:c•..:;•_.,:<.'-';'-',.,'--'-=-· Lk.:,_,_,,cl_;;<><:,_•:.:·•:..:./,..:.'.:.;,:..:~ __ ,_.,_,c __ 'l>-'.J, f,'----'.T...:-="-'---'ic'---------
'?1 ~·.., ft. ~ USGS QUAD HAP NA.ME: Cc".._5f TOW1"/ SH 1 P: N/S RANGE: E/W '
SCALE: 1:24,000 HAP DATE: 197<-/ SECTION: 1/4 1/4 ---1/4
HAP DATUH: @5) 1983 (CIRCLE Ot!E I HE RID IAN:
COORDINATES FROM LOWER RIGHT (SOUTHEAST) CO;\NER OF 7.5' HAP (attach phot:ocopy):
LONGITUDE: 7 (, o 37 ' 3o " LATITUDE: '35 ° l/5' 0,,
COORDINATES FROH LOWER RIGHT (SOUTHEAST) CORNER OF 2.5' GRID CELL:
LONGITUDE: ~o 1/)' )C,,, LATITUDE: 5o, 0 ,,
CALCULATIONS: LATITUDE (7.5' QUADRANGLE ~J\P)
A) NUMBER OF RULER GRADUATIONS FROM LATITUDE GRID LINE TO SITE RI:F POINT: li45
8) MULTIPLY (A) BY 0,3304 TO CONVERT TO SECONDS:
Ax 0.3304 i'11. ()3 ,, ----
C) EXPRESS IN HIHUTES AHO SECONDS ( l '= 60" I:
v ,
-1:__• '2-7 . D3 "
D) ADD TO STARTING LATITUDE: + '2-, 27 0 ------
SITE LATITUDE: '35 o 5')..., "27. 0 "
CALCULATIONS: LONGITUDE (7.5' QUADRANGLE HAP)
A) NUMBER OF RULER GRADUATIONS FROM RIGHT LOtlGITUDE LINE TO SITE REF POINT: ·3-5._',
B) t!ULTI?LY (A} BY 0.3304 TO COh'VERT TO SECOh'DS:
Ax 0.3304 l I l , 3 ·
C) EZ?RESS IN HINUTES AND SECONDS (l'= 60"): I , 57 -~ ,,
D) ADD TO STi-.RTING LOtlGITUDE: i , 57 . "3
INVESTIGATO?.: __ _,c"'-'· 'c._t:,,_._Q_, _.,_,,.,.,_r:o __ r_c_l ________ _ DATE:
E-10
I , ·C -
¥• ~--"
I:, NUHBER: rJlD CCO g1:; S?2
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
TOPOGRAPHIC MAP QUADRANGLE NA~IE: ___ ?_· _l_,fc...,_"_v_f_l.. __ E_c_,_>_·f-_________ SCALE: 1:2'.CXJO
COORDINATES OF LOWER RIGHT-HA.~D CORNER OF 2.5-MINUTE GRJD:
I LATITUDE: '35o 5'0' _Q___· LONGITUDE: lf•o 'fl· 3.:, ·
E-11
I
I
I
TECHNICAL PAPEH NO. 110
HAINFALL FHEQUENCY A'l'LAS or 'l'IIE llNl'l'EI) S'l'A'l'ES
fnr Durations fro111 30 Mi1111lc3 lo 2,(. I lou·rs a11d
flelur11 Periods f1·0111 I lo ] 00 Y1'.a1·s
IIA\ IIJ M. JU:H!'-IIHt-:1.U
\
PRCPERTY OF EPA
FITIV
Cl
Georgia-Pacific Corp. Hardwood Sa\wnill
NCD 000 813 592
Commerce
l'.761
Technical Pn er
11nrr:r:rnr
Ref. 4
,_ "y ~l ~ --~ ·.
--, . /4: '<·:':-
~~:
, m• ~-
--lri'Pm'i
~· (
.,. ··-.:· .
.. '. '
Environmental Science S.ervice5 Administration Environmental Data Service
-----l------j-----1-----1-----1------
o· -----1-----1-----1-----r-----1-----_,
-----1-----1--~--~-1-----1------1-----
-----1-----------1-----1----
n -i---rf--r'--r---i--'-n"n---+-,'.-4-~~;-.;:'-,-~~~~-/~2~~~19'..;~ £,.' u--7-t-t-t-t--t-t-=i=,:_ -(_ ':.:S
l-l-l--l---l--1-1-1-l-j: -----
-, ---f-i""R"'Pf-f---1 ffr== ~i~ :l:t; ~ =
!.. ~ • , 11:J [ §e i,; ,+..,Ll I" <--, "'i-C
---'-~ _ _s __ S.==·,:.:_j~ ----J =)1r=~1:f-.~t:~,.,l
::ti 'Iii' • .,, I • N ,, S!t!Ul"" H--+---0';'-~:r--. J-~
];I
1-1---l--H------
- - -__ Jc &,:1_ J__,__ Ed ___ ✓,, -_' -~}".:::::: -"".!. ~---,-
--Jq ---'-/~-''....::> -';J,; ; _, r_r1 f to
__ • __ ,/., • =C -~-.c1--~-~ _--ri--i-~i k=•-,---J ,i_ ----f'-f --~--------i ~-_:__ _ l) __ f Pf o ,,..,_ __ c:-i _ _ __ _ _ 1..-, _________ cl •-
HH-1--1----- --,-1--1-1-J
-----,_ -·--1-------
-------1---
·---------
------1--1-
-------·-1--
·1 ' . '*~t"Si' ;ff~:'
"~~:_ -/~--
' ',• .
'·
-~
' ' ·-
,i
,, ~ .,.
. ' '};
:rt .,
'
,. •,
(.1;. ~~; ~~-·--fi· ,.~1,.~~A~·
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Site Name:
Site Number:
Site Location:
Date: .
Distance from
Site Location
0 to 1/4 mile
> I /4 to 1/2 mile
> 1/2 to I mile
>I to 2 miles
>2 to 3 miles
>3 to 4 miles
REF. 6
GA-Pacific Corp. Hardwood
NCO 000 813 592
Plymouth, N.C.
Washington County
Latitude: 35 52 27.0
Longitude: 76 44 27.5
March 29, 1995
Calculation Results
Population Number of Households
Per Ring Cumulative Per Ring Cumulative
92 92 42 42
478 570 176 218
1,357 1,927 527 745
2,603 4,530 998 1,743
1,354 5,884 501 2,244
I, 118 7,002 424 2,668
Note: . The populations and number of households within specified target distance rings were
calculated for the NC Superfund Section by the NC State Center for Geographic
Information and Analysis using the 1990 US Census data. These values were calculated
by summing the population and the number of households data for each census block
located within each target ring. For census blocks lying only partially within the ring,
the per cent area of the block within the ring was multiplied by the population and
household densities of the block.
I
0
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1.
REF. 7
RCRA INSPECTION REPORT
Facility Information
Georgia Pacific Corporation
HDWD Sawrni 11
Plywood Drive
Plymouth, NC
Washington County
NCD000813592
2. Facility Contact
Gerald Tice, Environmental Engineer
3. Survey Participant
Fred Wood, District Sanitarian, DHS
4. Date of Inspection
October 21-, 1981
5. Applicable Regulations
40 CFR Part 262 and 265 May 19, 1980.
6. Purpose of Survey
RCRA Status Inspection including review of records, site survey and
sampling procedures. Regulatory requirements covered included those
contained in 40 CFR Par't 262 and 265.
7. Facility Description
The Georgia Pacific Corp. sawmill is located on 25 acres of land on
Plywood Drive in Plymouth. This property is bordered by the Roanoke
River. This facility produces hardwood lumber, railroad ties, etc.
According to Mr. Gerald Tice this plant has a NPDES permit from NRCD
that was inadvertently left off the Part A application.
The waste produced at this plant consists of waste oil, solvents, wood
treatment chemicals, and pesticides. These chemicals are used as a
wood fungicide and insecticide. They are manufactured by Coppers Co.
of St. Louis, Missouri under the trade.name Noxtane. Noxtane contains
pentachloropheneate and sodium metaborate and other chlorophenols.
The insecticide contains lindane.
The chemical waste is the result of dripping on the ground after the
wood passes through the dip vat. Most of this waste occurs at the end
of the conveyor system. I got conflicting information on where the
waste is disposed. One person said it was cleaned up and burned in the
boilers and another said it was carried to the county landfill. (,1~-;;... i:c.,:_..ef';)
----.·-·,.
Mr. Tice left instructions that from now on all waste material from this area
will be put in drums and stored in the hazardous waste storage area.
,.//., //:{fl ~ -d 6-t 4£.J-f, )
r H ..,, -f ,~v"r -
t
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
- 2 -
8. Documentation of Site Deficiencies
9.
Georgia Pacific Corp. HDWD Sawmill was deficient in the following areas:
1. Not providing a waste analysis plan. (265.13)
2. Inspection Requirements. (265.15)
3. Personnel Training Records. ( 265.16)
4. Arrangements with local authorities. (265.37)
5. No contingency plan. (265.50 -265.56)
6. No closure plan. (265.111-265.115)
7. Financial Requirements. (265.142)
Recommendations
It is recommended the facility take immediate action in complying with
the above deficiencies.
·lo. Compliance Schedule
All above deficiencies must be corrected on or before January 1, 19P2.
ii
II
II
p
II·
j1
p
I'
ti
II ,
fl ,,.
REFERENCE N REF. 8
l!lil
Georgia-Rlcific Corporation E.a.rurn Wood Prod:tm .
January 28, 1985
Ms, Lee Crosby, Chemist
North Carolina Division of Health Services
P. 0, Box 2091
Raleigh, North Carolina 27602-2091
Re: ERRIS Listing
Dear Ms. Crosby:
Manufacturing Division
P.O. Box 105603
Atlanta, Gtorgia 30348
Ttl,pbon, (404/ 521-4000
T,!,ryp, (8101 751-1000
As per your Decemb~r 4, 1984 letter, the following is the
requested information ~hich pertains to our plant locations
included on the ERRIS listing~ ..
1. Enfield (NCD000773507) hardwood sawmill
Location -S, Dennis Street Ext.)off U.S. 301 S),.
Enfield, North Carolina
Start-up of manufacturing operations -1977
2. Bowdens (NCD000773515) hardwood sawmill
Location -off Secondary Rt. 1301,
Bowdens, North Carolina
Start-up ~f manufacturing operations -1980
3. Plymouth-(NCD000813592).hardwood sawmill.
Location -Plywood Dr., .. :.
Plymouth, North Carolina
Start-up of manufacturing operations
This facility was purchased from Atlas Plywood around
1950. The purchased structure was theri torn down and
a new facility constructed.· Becatise of a fire in 1983
this plant was permanently closed.
4. Conway (NCD044388015) hardboard facility
Location -County Rd. 35,
Conway, Noith Carolina
Start-up of maufacturing operations -1960
Site Monitoring
Of the four facilities, only the Conway hardboard plant has
groundwater monitoring wells located on its plant site. These
wells were installed primarily because the plant site storm
. It Zl!45f Jt, 1 .. LZ .Ui!1JE,fi)1 WWWW,12 J!A€&M!tb,QJ;&&™~J&L-
11 :··-·
.. ·1·
ii
ii
p
11
P. p·
fl
Page Two
Ms. Lee Crosby
January 28, 1985
run-off at the adjacent Georgia-Pacific Resin facility and
run-off from material storage areas at the hardboard plant are
collected and treated in an aerated lagoon system. The ~ffluent
from the lagoon is spray irrigated (N.C. Permit #6376-R) on ~he
hardboard plant's property. The collection of well samples and
submittal of monthly monitoring reports is performed by the
resin plant. A sketch of the well locations is attached.
Past Waste Handling Practices
Based on current and past knowledge of the fo~r manufacturing
operations we do not suspect that any toxic or hazardous.
materials were buried on or off the plant sites. We make this
statement knowing that the process operations for.these plants
has remained virtually unchanged over the years.
Plant Site Drawings
A si.te plan for each of the subject facilities is enclosed.
We trust this provides the n~essary data for completion of your
survey. If further _discussio~ is required; please conta~t my
office at 404-521-5080.
Very truly yours,
p . . -/2~ 5~~~ . . . . .
P ~ TO; B. STEVENS · . · . ·
•
·---: ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEER . .
. EASTERN WOOD.PRODUCTS MANUFACTURING DIVISION
TBS:gr
Attachment/Enclosures
cc: Messrs: A. T. Johnson
G. W. Tice
G. F. McCaig
•
Please print (!r type in the unshaded areas only REF.9 .. -Form Approved 0MB No. 158-R0175 . rm: -in .?~eas are spaced far elite type, i.e., 12 characters/' -··'10).'-----• ---, . ,PA 1.D. NUMBER .Fo:::M :.... u.s. EN. .>N.MENTAL pf,
GEJRAL &EPA Gt:l'JERAL INFORMATION FNCD000813592 · ·· · Consolidated Permits Program
(Read the "General In,tru.ctions'" before .tarting.) 11 ,. t
GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
ff a preprinted label has; been provided, aff
· it::ln the designated space. Review the inforr
ation carefully; if any of it is incorrect, ere
through it and enter the correct data in. ti
appropriate fill-in area below. Also, if'any ,
the preprinted data is absent (the·area to ti
left of· the label· spBCe lisu the infarmatic
that should appear). please provide it in t:
proper fill:....in area(s) 1 below. If the label
complete and correct; you need not comple
. Items I; ,Ill, V, and VI (except Vl·B whit
must be completed regardless). Complete :
items it. no label has been· provided. Refer ·
, the instructions· for detailed· item· descri
·tions· and for· the• legBI authorizations unC
which this data is collected .. · · ·· · ·•·: ·
'INSTRUCTIONS:; Complete 'A through J to determine;whether. you need to submit any permit application forms to the EPA..lf you answer."yes'.' to.any
questions, you must submit this.form· and the supplemental form listed in:the .parenthesis following the question. Mark "X" in the box in the third column
if the suppleme·ntal:form is 'attached •. If. you answer "no'.'. to 'each question, you need not submit any of these forms.You may answer, "no" if youcac!(vity
is excluded frorri'pe!11lit requirementt; see Section C of the instructions. See also, Section D of the instructions for definitions of bold-fec,,d terms.·,· ··
YCI, .NO 1"0"'M
ATTAC:MC
A.::-1 s; · 'th iS'.~ ·fa~i lit'v, :'8? publicly ::·'Clwned ':treatment:·. works
\Which {'ri:sUlts :ifl'.:a:,,disch8rge :to (waters of the· U.S;?.
'F,OR.~.: 2~l ,.\ffi~J~. ->i?'~.;~t~\Y:t,_~~\)?{<:: ;.::, _; ;;·\·:.:·;. ~1--+cx~,.,,,+-.,.,.,---j
ls,t is~a. acility-w 1c "currently resu ts· in tse arges
to watari of.,tha:U,S;.'other. than those described in
A or B abo\le? FORM 2C
o you·or w1 you·iniect at t 1s acz 1tv any pro uc
water.Or·otherrfluids whic:h1.are brought to the surface
in connection· with conventional oil or natural gas pro-
. -duction;' inject· fluids used for enhanced recovery of
·,.~··:-~oil or·natural gas;:or•iriject~fluids,for. storage of liquid _..,, .. h drOcarbons? {FORM"4). ;:~,-• · ... :, ... ~• ., .... ·· .... ,
s t is-. ac1 tty a proposed stationary source wnicn 1s
one·· oF the· 28.-industrial categories, listed in the in-
structions and•,which will, potentially emit 100 tons
X
"
X per year.· oF=8nv.'.Sir· pollutant regulated under the
. Clean Air Act: arid "1ay :affect. or be located in en
attainment area? (FORM'S) ,•• 1-~1-.,--1~-~--1
Ill. NAME CF FACILITY·
A. STREET OR P.O. BOX
0 B O X 1 8 0 8
B. CITY OR TOWN
SPECIP'IC QUESTIONS
B;. Does or will·this facility (either existing or proposed)•.
Include a concentrated· animal feeding operation· or
aquatic-'animal· production facility which· results in, a, ..
dis::herge to waten of the U.S.7 (FORM 28) . , . ! ·:~.
D. Is this a propo aciilty o er than those described
. in A ors· above)"which will result in a discharge.to~
waters of the U.S.? !FORM 201
F. Do you or will you inject at this facility industrial or
municipal effluent below the lowermost stratum con-
taining; •within one quarter mile· of• the well bore,
underground sources of drinking water? (FORM 4) 1
H. Do you or will you inject at this facility fluids toi spe-
cial processes such as mining of·sulfur by the Frasch·
process, solution mining of minerals, in situ· comb'us-·
tion of fossil, fuel, or recovery of geothermal. energy?
IFORM 4) . ' ·.:,::-_ :;;c:' •f:, .'
J. Is this ac1lity a propos stationary source wh1cn 1s
NOT one of the 28 industrial categories listed in the
instructions and which will potentially emit 250 tons
,,
M
X
•·• ll
X
.• l7
X
"
X . ,.
X per year of any air pollutant regulated under the Clean
Air Act and may affect or be located in an attainment·
a,..1 I FORM 51 l-c4~+-~
e. PHONE (area code & no.)
4 0 4 7 1 5 1
A. STREET, ROUTE.NO. OR OTHER SPECIFIC IOENT1FIER
W O O D D R I V E
B. COUNTY NAME
SHINGTON
" C. CITY. OR TOWN'.
H
..
O.STATE E. ZIP COOE
2 7 9 6 2
F. COUNTY COO
· n n
. ,.
COl1TINUE ON REVE
SIC CODES (4-digir, in order of prioriry; ·'
A, FIRST
(specify J
4 2 1 Pl r M. 7 7
C. THIRO D. FOURTH
(specify/
. OPERATOR INFORMATION
A. NAME B. l:1 the neme listed In 1-,:;:::-,--,--,--,--,--,--,--,--,--,--,--,-,--,---,-,--,--,-,--,-,-,---,-,-,--,--,,-,-,,-,-,-,-,T,-r,,---j Item V 11 l·A alao the
owner?
E O R G I A -P A C I F I C C O R P O R A T I O N -A U G U S T A GA ~ YES ONO •• ..
c. STATUS OF OPERATOR (Enter the appropriate lerter into the answer box; if "Other", specify.) D, PHONE (area code & no.)
7 1 5 1
" " ; ,•·:c'E. STREET OR P.O. BOX
0 B O X 1 8 0 8
· F:·clTY OR TOWN IX. INDIAN LAND
U G U S T A
ts the facility located on Indian lands?..,. ' . ·' .,, • V'"· 0 YES [],NO:. . . ·,s,•:c
!12 •. ••. :_."},?.;;:~.
A. NPOES (Discharges·to Surface Water) o. PSO (Air Emissions from Proposed Sources)
g p
" " " " " E. OT_H ER (specify)
C ' g 3 7 7 2 /specify) Planer Mill Cyclones
" ,. ,. " " " \
E. OTHER (specify)
l ach to this application a topographic map of the area extending to at least one mile beyond property bounderies: The map must show.
outline-of the facility,.the location of each of its existing and proposed intake and discharge structures, each of its hazardous waste
atment, storage, or disposal facilities, and each well where it injects fluids underground. Include all springs, rivers and other surface
· water bodies in the map area. See instructions for precise requirements.
NATURE OF BUSINESS (provide a brief description
"This establishment is primarily engaged in sawing and planing rough lumber land/ or timber from logs."
I
I
. CERTIFICATION (see instructions)
nify under penalty of law that I have personally examined and am familiar with the information submitted in this application and all
attachments and that, based on my inquiry of those persons immediately responsible for obtaining the information contained in the
lication, I believe that the information is true, accurate and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties f0r submitting
information, including the possibility of fine and imprisonment.
AME .!Ir OFFICIAL TITLE (rype or print) 8. SIGNATURE C. DATE SICNEO
• Hersereau -Senior Vice President N av 1 2 1sso
MENTS FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
REVERSE
-.FOf'M -3 ·oEPA
CAA
OATE RE.C.EIVEC r. mo. <l da
U.S. ENVIR--,..,..,.MENTAL P~OTECTION AGENCY
HAZARDOU' ;\ASTE PERMIT APPLICATION
c. ... -.... OJidarsd P'!rmiu Program
(Thia information LI required under Section 3005 of RCRA.)
COMMENTS
ace an "X" in the appropriate box· in A or 8 below (mark one box only) to indicate whether this is the fim acplication you are submitting for your facility c
ised application. If this is your first application and you.already know your facility's EPA 1.0. Number, or if this is a revised application, enter your facility·
EPA 1.0. Number in Item I above. ·
Fl RST APPLJCA TION (pl.o,,ce en "X" below.and pro1.1IIU the appropriate dau)
~ I. l!XISTING FACILITY (Su ln,tructio"-6 for d.eflnitton of "e.xLltinr" facility,
71 CompUlte it•m below.) • _ .
l"OR l:XJSTTNG FACILITIES. l'AOVIDE THE CATE (yr., mo •• & d.o-:,)
OP'ERATION Bl!:GAN OR THlt CATE. CONSTRUCTION COMMENCEC
(UH the b0%•• to th• l•ft)
N (place a.n "X" below and compl,tt.e item I aboue)
□ 1. P'ACJLITY HAS INTERIM STATUS
" . PROCESSES -CODES AND DESIGN CAPACITIES
' n2.NKW Jlll'ACI.LJTY (Complsts It.em /Hlow.) ~ ,-OR Nl!:W FACJLITJ
----------• Pl"IOVICIIE THI!: DAT (yr.,.mo., & day) ope:·
TION 81!:GAN OR JS
EXP't!:CTll:D TO Bl!:G·
□·2. JFACli.iTY HAS A RCRA PttRMIT .,
PROCESS COCE -Entar the code from the lirt of process codes below that be-st describes eech procesa to be used at the facility. Ten lines are provided fc
entering codes. If more lines are need&d, enter the code(:) in the space pro-.ided. If a process wilJ be used that is not ineiuded in the lilt at codes below,ith£
describe the process (incl'!ding Its daigncapacity) in the space provided on.the form (Item lll•C). · · ~·
· PROCESS OESJGN CAPACITY -F~r B8ch code &nt;red in coiumn·A enter the capacity of the proceu. ,. ,_ . .-,. ·:{:T:~~~}f~·?.:):'/.\·t;,~ ,. AMOUNT -Enter the amoont. · . ' " • , -.. · . _ . :,•::. " ·•· ._~:..;, -, .. ·.·.~ .. ~::-··,
UNIT OF MEASURE -For tech amount entered in column 8(1.), enter the code from the llrt ot unit measure code:s below that describes the unit o1 '
measure wed. Oniy the units of measure that are listed below should be used. , .. ~.~, .. :ii/., .. :\:;;,·;••.-
, . PRO' APPROPRIATE UNITS OF APPROPRIATE UNITS OF··
CESS . MEASURE FOR PROCESS· MEASURE FOR PROCESS
.: PROCESS CODE· DESIGN CAPACID' ·. :,.. DESIGN CAPACITY·
CONTAINER (b"'o.rnl,. dTum,. .ii}> sot .. ~'GALLONS OR LITERS.
-:,.:· :,·-.-·.-•1 ··•":·!:
TANK -; SO%."· GALLONS OR LJTE.RS -'
.GALLONS Pf:R. DAY OR
LITERS PER CAY ..
WASTE" PJL.!!::,:_~ .~_:;,:·~:;::.: SOJ:· -CUBIC YARDS OR
· .. '. .so.a·;:'.:~UABLILCO~ESTOEARSUT"RS,
.:._ .. i\>\ S~f!P'AC!!: IMPCIUNO~.ENT. T02: GALLONS PER OAv·oR1
LITERS PER CAY
SURP'AC~ IM_P.?UNDMENT :_-:·: -.. ,. n ..,
:-• • ..
SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT··~.
UNIT OF MEASURE
.·:o71'"·-GALLoNs oR .. L1TERs ····
oao . .: ACRE-FE!!:T (the uotum.s that ~·: ... -:.would couer on.e acre to a
·, , 1 depth of ona foot) OR
., 7 HECTARE-METER
ca1:-ACRES OR H!:CTARl!:S
D82 GALLONS PER DAY OR
LITER'S PER DAY
083., GALLONS OR LITERS·
UNIT OF
MEASURE · cooE·
:~-.'.)'OJ·., TONS PER HOUR OR METRIC TONS PER HOUR:
·.·oTHER ({Jae for phy,lcal,· ch•mictuy
tlwrrnaJ Or btolo1ical treatment proct1ue• not occurrlni iri ta.n}u.. · AJT(oce impoundm•ntl or inci~,..
ato,... De,c::rib.e tha proce.u• in
. the ~po,ctJ prouiiud: It~m ll1•C.)·. ·
TO,
... GALLONS PltR HOUR OR
~ITERS PER HOUR
GALLONS P'l!:R CAY OR ·
''UTERS PER DAY · ;
·, ·:•.:.::~:::·.·.:·~\ /·})}\··:::~:-:
. UNIT OF MEASURE
GALLONS. ~ • .• .•; ·, .. Q. -~-LJ'TER5 PER DAY-.... • .• , , v:. ACRl!E•fl'l!:ET •• ;. . • • ., •••
LITERS • , • • • • : ;. ~ L TONS PER HOUR·. • ; ;· _. o· .·~ Hl!:CTARl!:-Ml!:TER.
..~\ .. _.~ ... ,,,..
. .. · .. , .~ .....
CUBIC YARDS. -. •.· .··' •. -.·,•.•.··.·_.;·: •• '.,~.·•.;." ·Me:TRIC TONS PER· HOUR~· _.";•:· .: /~ W ·. ACRES •. • •
CUBIC METERS -C.ALLONS PER HOUR , • • • ,· .• , .·• .. ,.e:: " HIECT ARES ••. ~ •• :
GALLONS PER CAY ; •. ~.: •. C:-.'·. ·_:.:;._·;.-.• : •. u, ·::·'..!: Ll~RS Ptl"R HOUR. ; ··• •; • : ·~. ~. ;;:.,"; ~·tt-· ••-·:.: · .:~ ·. ·-" .
•·· ...... ·• 8
........... Q
MPLE FOR COMPLETING ITEM Ill (shown in line numben X-1 and X-·2 below): .A facility has two storage tank3, one tank can hold 200 gaUont and th
ther can hold 400 9Bllon1. The facility also ha, an incinerator that can burn up to 20 gallons per hour~ ·
DUP
B. PROC.ESS.DESIGN CAPACITY
.,f. AMOUNT · (,pecif":/)
600
20
3520
"
2. UNIT
OF MeA
SURE (ent11r code)
G
E
G
FOR
OFFICIAL
USE
.ONLY.
a: A. PRO·+---B_._P_R_o_c_E_ss __ o_E_s_,_G_N_c_A_P_A_c_,~T_Y __ _
~ CE:SS
LI.I CODE z ~ (from lilt Jz abo1.1ef
FOFi
OFF'JC:
5
6
7
8
9
10
" u .. 11 a
PAGE 1 OF S
·.1. AMOUNT
"
%. UNIT
01" MltA·
SURE (~nte~
code) ..
..
..
"
USE
ONL'
CONTINUE ON REYE
ROCESSES /conrinued) ·, --11¥11/i!1tffi.~
CE FOR AOOITIONAL PROCESS CC. ."J OR FOR OESCRIBING OTHER PROCESSES (c~_ .. "T04"). FOR EACH PROCESS ENTERED HERE
!-UOE DESIGN CAPACITY.
I
I
I
I
I
ESCRIPTJON OF HAZARDOUS WASTES
A.. A H O NUMB -nter the tour-ai91t numoer rom R,. Soop.art D ror eacn listed hazaraou, waste you w1 handle. If you
handle hazardous YY&stel which are not listed in 40 CFR. Subpart 0, enter the four-dlgjt number($) from 40 .. _CF_R._Subpart C that describet the_cherticteri►•, ;: ·_ r -~nd~or,_th~ ~xi_c_.~n~-i~~ o~ .t~ ~-~-~~-;~~--·:. ~). ~.:.;::' :'-,"/\ -~·r~.:~•.;):·:=\),?.;_::;~;(i~t-{i/~1(.///\;);:'.;~\~\;{{)-t(t-\: \(/•.:\-~(?/!>.~:~ ·.\;; :-\)f }:
B. (IT1MA TEO ANNUAL QUANTITY -For each llstad warta entered In· column A estimate-the quantity af that wasts that 'Nill be handled on an llllnual ,
· basis~ For each characteristic or toxic contaminant entered in column A fflimata the totm an~ quantity; of au the non-Hsted warce(i). that will be handled.
. · .. ~i~ ~. ~hat '~~~r.i~i-~ ~-~. ~~~i~-~ ·.·. -~·.· )~~J\ ~):\i_;.}/f/i{: .'\-/ :~\-?(f.;.:f\.:.:°J.{,;-;;::~.:~t~<~:~i :\>}·.)•;:: .. .-i~··;_~.· :(\:;_/?;~·: \?/:t~ )(/.·./)};~it):
C.. ~ OF MEASURE:_ For eech q"t,antity ·emared in coJumii. B enur the unft·of-memurv code. Untts:·af. me81Ura·which.mun bet used and tfit,.approprfatv, , •. -·. ·· ·~~~i'.;:.~'i'!~i;·;~·;,;~~0(7:6i,'.).df :l[c~~~~iiTI!,~!;;ii ;;;; .. •;~ 1,::r:::Ji~i i~I&!
·1t faeiJity recon:k use any other unit ot·measurs. for-quantity, th&-units of.ma.sun, muei·be eon~-in10-one of the rec:iuired uniu of meel!JnJ_taking Into D.,;;:~:~:::· denuty ~'. ;0:.~~;~;;;p-~i:i::7i,:,'{:f::: :.~5~-0;0~~'.'.~s~:::~?:rf!:2<~;,:-HJ:i{.:, •'•·••· i,'., '.' '. ,':;·~~::':};\:;~·::~::'
For lilted hazardous wats: For ·each lirtad hazardoui waste.entered in column A sektc't the code(s}-from· th& list of procesa codes contained In ltsm 111.·
.. : . to indicate how the waste will be stored, treated, and/ex disposed of at the facility. · · ·. · --~ ..,.: ··:: :::~t_:-.: ·:-: '<:::-· · ,: -.:·:: . -·. · ,.-, : ·.· .,: :.: . • •:.. ··:~· -·:<-'•<'::·-': . ·a For non-fisted hazardous wanes: For each characteristic or toxic contaminant entered in column A, select the code/1) from the list o1 process-code,.
.-.:: contained in !te_m 111 ~ indic8te _all the procesaes ~~· !"i.11 ~-~-~--~o~~ -~r_a_~/°!". ~-~~-~t_. ali_:th~---.~~list~--~~~u• -~ that_ Po~~---.· _. that charectenstic or toxic contaminant. · · .. -.·.-· .. -... " , -..... •, ·-. · ·. . ~ ·. · ·· ....... · . ··-· •, - . . · . · .. .
· ... -. Note: Four space, ant provided for entering_proeesl codes •. If more are.needed:··11) enter the first.three as described above; 12r Enter_"OOO-;in the·:
· . .-,. e.xtreme right box of Item IV-0(1); and (31 Enter in the space provided on page 4 .. the line number an_d the-additional code(s).: · :,::'· _ ·w·-::~~ :-:-: ~, . _, ~ •· .R P~OCESS OESCA;PTJ~N: i1 .~.;~·not i;..~~o~ ~~ ,;;~ ,.;;J~F.i.d~i~~~~-i~~ ~+~;~ 0~ ;™.'fo~~"'E•·:c;rt.?::;
NOTE: HAZARDOUS WASTES DESCRIBED BY MORE THAN cii.iii EPA HAZARDOUS WASTE, NUMeiiii":.,c ~rd;;.;~ ;.,;,~i u,..; ,,;,h "".deocribod by
more than one EPA Hazardous Wasta Number $hall be described on the form es follows:. ..:... .. _ ... ,_.· . .-. ->.-;-..:._-_. s.,: :,:··. · ... ·: •• ,-..• · . _-·.•. _,-._. .• , ··"· ..... -.. ·~, ••.•.. _. • . o Select one of the EPA HazardQus Waste Numbers and enter-it in cdumn A. On the S21me li·ne eomp(ete C01urrm1 B,C. and D by estimating the totm annual .
·;· quantity of the waste and describing all the processes to be used to treat, store, and/or dis;pose ot the waste. . ·. . , : . ·. · -,_·-. · ' .. ·-
. • In column A of the next line enter the othet' EPA Hezardou.s Wute Number that can be used to describe the waste. In column 0{2) on that line enter
.. lncludedwithabove"andmaksnootherentriesonthatline. . . . .. . ·· J • " ..... ,.-., .. , ••••
Repeat step 2 for each other EPA Hazardous Waite Number that an be-used to dacribe the hazardous west&. -~ ·_ . . ,_. • :. '· ·-.-;-~· __ -:_·:· ." ,--_ .. -· ·. _. _.,,.-~: · .
E~ Lf FOR COMPL~~G iT~M ;~· /dr~-/~ i1n~·nu~ben ;_;~ x.i-x.a, an;~:, beJ;;,/~·i· ~~ci·;ity ~II -tr~\~ ~is:.~~~ esti~,~ed ~~~nm·
~ r of ehnJf'ffll shnings from leat~ tanning and fini.shiog operation. In addition, the facility will treat and dispo-se of three non-listed wSstes. Two waste,
are corrosive only and there will be an ntimated 200 pound, per year of each WBSte. The other w:asta is corrosive and ignitable and there will be an estirnat&d
1 nds per year of that waste. Treatment will be in an incirterator and disposal will be in a landfill.
A.EPA C.UNIT C. PROCESSES
"' ~AZARC. B. EST1MAT'ED ANNUAL 0~ ME.A z· ASTE NO QUANTITY OF WASTE SURI!: f. PROCESS CODltS 2. PAOCE"SS OESCRl~ION ~ (enter code) (anter (~ntar) ·· · (If a cod•'-not entervd In D( 1 )) co")
I I I I I I I I
K o 5 4 900 p T 0 3D80
I l ' 7 ,7 ' ·' I ~ D o o 2 400 p T o 3 D8 o
' I I I ' ' ' x_ D o o 1 100 p TO 3 D8 o
_xlD ' I I I I r ' I o o 2 included with above
,?A Fann 3510-3 16-801 f'("HUTIJIJI IC f"'IJIJ C/\r.:C
A.EPA
HAZARD.
Zo WASTENO J z (enter code}
B. ESTlMATED ANNl.JAL
QUANTlTY OF WASTE
.. .. ..
K 0 0 1 16,300
D 0 0 0 20.000
D 0 0 7
D 0 0 8
5 F 0 0 1 375
F O O 3
F 0 0 5
10
I
~ ~.tZ-1-------C--------_;._;C::·:..Pc.:..:R::O:;C::..:E::S::S::E::S:._ ____________ _
SURE (tinter
coda} .,.
I p
a p
p
·. l. PROCz=~9 COO ES , (•nt«rJ
1 I , 1 1 I l
S O 1
' ' ' ' ' ' '
s O 1
' ' ' . '
. ' ' ' ' '
' ' ' ' '
S 0 1
' ' ' ' ' '
' ' ' ' '
' ' I ' ' '
I I ' '
' ' ' ' .
I ' ' ' ' ' '
2. PROCESS OE.SCRtPT10N
· (If Q code ~ /'1.Ct t1ntt1rcd In D( 1)) ·
Included with above
Included with above
Included with above
Included with above
,_2_·i· -t-+-+---+------------+'_:{.,;'.f-+>~··-c··· f-.-:7:r-t-7,-.-:+-,--:.-+-,,-.-:+--------------------
13
14 ·.,
' ' . . ' I I
' ' . ' ' ' '
,-:-· +-++-+-l------------+-:.-'-.l--t•'-..• _JO•l-~,T,-l-~,T,--l-,r-~+-~-~,+-------------------
1 -
' ' ' I ' ' '
' ' ' ' '
' ' ' I I I I
' ' ' ' ' ' ' 0
' ' ' ' ' ' '
I I I I ' ' ' ' 2
' I ' ' ' 23
' ' ' I I I I I
4
I I I I I ' '
6 ' ' ' ' ' ' '
t't U?7•nn•ttt4 u
CONTINUE ON REVE:
PAGE3· __ OFS
(enter "A", "B ", "C", etc. behind the "3" ta identify photocopied page•)
IV DESCRIPTION OF HAZARDOUS v· .. -TES {cor.rinued} j2"~ tsE TnlS SPACE TO LIST AOOIT AL PflOCESS COO ES FROM ITEM 0( I) C.
I
I
I
I
I
AC!LITY DRAWING
\'t~fi&fflitt!Pt~ AGEJ. ' -.
All existing facilities must include in the ~pace provided on page 5 a scale drawing of the f_aci!ity (see insrructions for more derail).
VIHOTOG RAPHS )WS!RE¥ii&ii-i@ ""'9@tfii&HiH&¥&¥ii¥ A xi sting facilities must include photographs {aerial or ground-Jew,/} that clearly delineate all existing muc:1ures; existing storage,
treatment and disposal areas; and sites of future storage, treatment or disposal areas (see instructions for more derail}.
FACILITY GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION
FACILITY OWNER
If the facility owner is also the facility operator as listed in Section VI 11 on Form T, "Generai Information", place an "X"' in the box to the left and skip to Section IX below. · -· · · -· · ...
If the facility owner is not the faciiiry operator as listed in Section VIII .on FOrm 1·, complete the following iU!ms:
t. NAMI!: OP FAC1LJTY'5 L.ECAL. OWNER 2. PHONE NO. (area cod~ & no.)
. .. H 1' • It " ..
3. STREET OR P.O. aox. 4.. CITY OR TOWN 5. ST. 6. ZIP COOE
GI I I .u.
IX. OWNER CERTIFICATION
1 IJy under penalty of law that I have personally examined and am familiar wirh the information s.ubmirred in rhis and all attached
do enrs, and that based on my inquiry of those individuals immediately responsible for obtaining the information, I believe that the
sue itted information is true, ac::urate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information,
including the possibility of fine and imprisonment_ •
A. ,ME /print or t:;peJ B. SIGNATURE C. DATE SIGNE □
S. ~ersereau NOV 121980
ERA TOR CERTIFICATION
ify under penalty of law that I have personally examined and am familiar with the information submitted in this and all attached
dccuments, and rhat based on my inquiry of those individuals immediately responsible for obtaining the information, I believe rhat the
su,,., itted information is true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are signific:;nt penalties for submitting false information,
· ' ing the possibility of fine and imprisonment.
,I\. NAME (;}l'int or type;
I S. Mersereau
;p..., rm 3510-J (6-30)
B. SIGNATURE
PAGE40F5
C. DATE SIGNE □
NOV 1 2 1980
CONTINUE ON PAG=:
Con:inu'ed frOm page 4. 'i. FA'CILITY'DRAWING (see page 4) ~-Fo,m App,o,ed 0MB No. 158-S80004
'PA Fo,m 3510-3 (6-801
~£1.Zr.=JRDO.U.S _
-//.IR5 T.(:;.-_
STORl?c;;t: ~
(ec,',<zo') v
__ 2,C..,9/1..,I_E,f:' __ _
I
I I
r ________ _!G,.-i;:C:i,;O!J,3,,.. ·PACU'lC CORPORA T!O,f
3 so;-;•':;;:,;-;1/c;--------______ , ~ P. 0. tlbX !SOB
"'9i!:' I'/( '-1\, Al.!C\JSTA, GEOllGlA 309©
PAGESOFS
I
I
I
I
I
I ,,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
DIVISION OF HEALTH SERVICES
P.O. Box 2091.
Raleigh, N.C. 27602-2091
Mr. Gerald W. Tice
Georgia-Pacific Corporation
P.O. Box 1808
Augusta, Georgia 30903
Dear Mr. Tice:
REF. 10
Date: August 11, 1982
Re: Facility ID No.
{.//~ . oc:··;nald H. Levine, M.D., M.P.H.
STA TE HEAL TH DIRECTOR
NCD000813592
Based on infonnation suppl led by you we have processed and accepted at the State
level your·request for the facility identified with the above ID number to re-
ceive the indicated change in classificat i.on under RCRA:
Add As Delete As ------
D 0 genera tor
D □ transporter
□ □ treater
□ ~ storer
□ D disposer
[81' □ small generator
We arc aclvisinp., EPA o[ the chcmg"c in your status.
any f11rther change in your operations whic:h would
Your EPA ID NO. is D is not~ being cancelled.
Please notify us if there is
;1gnin affect your status.
01-1S
cc: John Herrmann·
EPA Region IV
Emil llreckling
Fred Wood
DIIS form 3048 3/82
Soli.<l & lbz. Waste Mg t. Branch
Cordially,
(O~~
0. W. St n.c kl::rnd, i?e::'d
Solid & Hazardous Waste Management Branch
Envi ronmen cal_ Heal th Section
\ I STATE,OF NOR:TH CAROLINA Jorn;:·, fl Hur'!, lt/·ocr~-..RitAENT Of HUMAN RcSOU~Ct:S ~-oruh f ,'.\oOION, .',\D, :.,PH 1 GOVFRNOi-1 ~EUEfAqy
·-·-····-------·--··--------·--------------·----------··---------------·-----·---·---·-----·-·-··-.. pp-• p...,._
REF. 11
· NORTH CAROLINA
HAZARDOUS WASTE
MANAGEMENT RULES
and
SOLID WASTE
MANAGEMENT LAW
DEHNR
DIVISION OF SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT
HAZARDOUS WASTE SECTION
P. 0. BOX 27687
RALEIGH, NC 27611-7687
· [phone]
January 1, 1995
State of North Carolina Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resource■
Jam.ea B. Hunt, Jr., Governor Jonathan B. Howe■, Secre~
Property of _____________ _
Address
Telephone
This Book is manufactured of a High Grade
50% Rag Paper having a Water Resisting Surface,
and is sewed with Nylon Waterproof Thread.
IN DE X
c..
... ---·· ·--·-··•--l----1----1---
------------·I--------1----
---------------· -----------------
··-............. ··-----· .. ---+---1----1--
-· ·-·---·· ----1-----1----1---
---·---·------1----1-----1----
.. ---··· ----1----1----+---
-------------1·----------'1----1----1·------~
--··-------1----1----1----1----
. --·-··------1----1----1---
---------·-----------•-•I--------1-----
.---·· ·-·-··· -·----··---1----1·---·1----
.... ------------1-----1---
----------1---··------
··------------------1----1----1----
--··-· ··----····-·· ----1----1·---I---
- --------------1·--------1----1----
- --------·-----------1----1----
' -------------------------------------l
:-~=--~==:~== =~=-==---~-_--: I
--1--------t-----1----------
-

-
-------------------1----1------I
---------------------1----1----------I
I
--------------------------~-1----1----j
-------------1----1----1-----j------
----

-
---------------------~-·--
------------·----1---1----1---------
--------------1------------r---
r ·. ;:oi: i
'
'
' it
.j;: .~~; ·•,~1
;\~t
;:{'Ji. : ;/:!~f' ;Jf~· ... ~-;JC :,:';.,".~~
\t.~~~-~pt
r=
i ' ' '
;
~
'·
(
' ~
·.
:
: -~ t '.~
'· ~;; ,. ~-;_;•· ... ''~ ',~;_ ~: . . -~":,. ~
~~~-·,,=,.Jl\'l ff::~:·' '•\~~.&j} ::.:-~.::~~j~~~
· --------1----1------+-------l---
---------· ---------------------·1----1----1··--~
----------------1----1-·---·
--·---···-------------•l•---1---1---
----------1----1--·-•------
·--........ _._ -· -· -·--·-----·-···-··--1---·1-----1-----
· -··· ·-·-·· --···--·---·1-----1-----
-------· · -·· · -----1----1---·l-----f------
--·----·-·--· · -·· · -·---1----1·---1----1--~
--------------·----1---1---1---
·-·-···---·--·-1----1----1·---
--··-· -·--··-1---11---: ---
------------------1----11----1--~ :~ii~~. :~t~----~fi~~ ., ;.1(-;~,~~ . --·-----. ~s-R\~·::.:Ji~~t · •f:}~'\:,:,.;c,,~,~,~ 11,~~: .---------------------·--------
'\ii~t~ -------· -----------------···--·1----1----1----
'.~-.... ~)'~.;:-....., f:i!i;r-· ::.~ki~.;•·~ ½~~~ . -_, -·::-...~··:i:~~"'-· , ... -.. ~.,.-.-(~•)-.. -==-~-:5}~~:. r i~:~./S.1titt• : •.~; ~ --~~-•-.-~,x.~...,..;:~,,;_,"('~:;t,, k ..,,_ .-.-.;.,..·~~t-~• .. i.c... ':i'f}.rt~{!:~z " . . ~i~\(:.:,~~~~,-~~~~-~i--~Wt ~:--
, .. •e;: ·"' !$: ·:,:.~
?~-~
,<,':i -~~t~1 ·.;f1f~
. ~r}5!, . :_:::;,~ft ... l''t: .••·-".'\tJ•~"•. ,,•>:,~,.; f=%1t~ -: t:.~~-~3.,i-~ ;,i{~-fr)~-~:...-.ii~· : ~'ltd.~~~-•~-.., . ·:~;1:(;; ;, ;;t. ,.,j;'.;"·•·'1-;. ,.., . -~,-~~{;.,.~)
. _fiF•~:S:;;;s ,.,-~:..i !l,.'i"., , .);<',.Gil< . . ;:.::~~:ii ·-,:~l x,._ .. ;.~:
·~~ '.~~-
<;;:
*:.:-<' ,) ..... ~a;; "if " ' .:1~-
~:;.:; .. -" ,.,,, fhlf>.
•'•
., ..
{i--:S:----~~­k~t1½~1 1.,-"'~";~: ~ ··;'<:®\'-::,; 'h* .... ,., .. ,.~-·I·'''), :,,, ~s-,__a~,:.,
,-:r;"';'l'.•,:~~-~~ ~:~&:~-:-...:.:,"• ~::-:.§:~W· . ~;,~~}'-~·
i,;.t,}~~ , .. -:-.~~~?-::.~•~-fu "'J,~~m-'.~,-, ·l' &)',f.;,,;,,-~'r-• • • ..... :::; =! ..... ~ .. ~-r~•:-. .. ,. \. ......... ' '" .~ .... ❖--.. ,.·'-'"%:':1,--~~\1'l . ,;:•:-,,;..-:~?j,.:(' ·-),"(. ,~·,t::p-.:;.~~ : ..... ~l-'(~·-:1: ~:-:.'{,,-.;>~(.°·~{~f~~ ... --~•i·~ :i ·c:.~;__ 1'•:; ...... ">:':.:-'}•·=--.. ,[¼.~~"'~ -~. ~·-* . • ;,-; ~{~-' • ,-<"..::...l, -~ .._ • • •~\,'_(t{'~••~ "¾:""''~ ~-.y~,,:, S::!-'--. • ...!! ........ ~ ---•."... "r ,.;_, __ , ... .,.:'.:.•• ........... ~ ...
-------------
'
-·-· -----------------------------------·-:::: __ :: = =,-::::::: ---------------------- -----~------______ , ______ , ___ _ -----------·------7-------j-------_ _____ / ----. --------. - - ---------------1--------
-------------1----1----1-----1----
--------1-----1-------j--------
.. -----------1----1----1----
---------·-----1-----1----1----+----
--------------a----1----1----<----
-------------1----1----1----r---
--~--------1----1----1----f-----
Property of _____________ _
Address
Telephone
This Book is manufactured of a High Grade
50% Rag Paper having a Water Resisting Surface,
and is sewed with Nylon Waterproof Thread.
IN D E X
, 1
.. --·------
--·-. -------·
-~" -~~,.1~-
~-~ ccik, --b ,;;i&, -. _IJ-:,J, _--, _ __l_'.,3
ac, i{;(L I -.S'J.." f l J,".yAJ
·-------·--~--
----------
-1,~,-iJ,_dr . v:c _dM-u_ A _.J.,..ikc:J
_{ -~ . 4• J'd. . :.s• iJ'"i)-+-~-r,1fl~.
, ~ W · 5,.J_~~J_L otl-
--
~----
-
,_ Do'! -£ }) ___ 1.sh£, t,,_o~ k.D._
1
1:"j---
-----.s_t ....,_., J,Gi!ii.
--G_P ~/01:.S?L,i a. rtt,dH'v:
. •· ... . .
•·· ,' -,
' ••
•,:
•:
1;."
·" ;.,:.. . . . .,, .::;;-
Jl_ -~· : .. -;
.-~❖ •J•. ~.:. •" '
!!
J ~ ~ , ~AJ.i. , •. Lt~--~_~_,,--
--J . ----··-----· ------1--_fl J c,~_--f_y_. _Lkk...:: _]_6_!_],_c_,-1---
1---f----1----·------:r_ -:ti.. S ll~.S ' _c.;_j;_.___1---
_o"t qayl._ r • ...._ __ 1 __ _
. 11,_:J.i::_lb
--· -------·-----·----11------1---1-----1---
----~----
-__ I(;!_</~::__ _ 6fL F,y_l , _ ~----_
f -~ '• ' _, f-.... ---t 1"'----="'-=-1"---"'--='--""'"----1 '-"'-----~---· -· ..
______ G
--flU.½ __
:t;;;;;Q iP]-k: __ 10: .. -J~: ____ _
ak=_ fi_G __ s-_ 29-1<;_~ _<J,,,_-_
-----_ ___Gj) _ (Xjf Sc.... _ (µJ-1:... -~ ----------
UJ'~-pct,J---------------------
Property of _____________ _
Address
Telephone
This Book is manufactured of a High Grade
50% Rag Paper having a Water Resisting Surface,.
and is sewed with Nylon Waterproof Thread.
IN D EX
i3 c:,-o/£
,-~ ~-,1.~~Elff~\"t'~l't~J~r -~~t~{ft~:i!~~
>f_ -.-. ;i.;. :::.s.-.,-! .~\~•:S.~~~:;-=x .. ~>r~~-~.::$.t~~:·\ ~~ ··<t~;•,»~:-~ ,.. .. ,_ \;...:,..~•--·~ •.'\:,~
l . ,B~~~i~i~ . ,:c;;:,;.~;:~ , .. ~.: .. ~';" .\{~ ,.~ . . .. \ •· -~ •;;;t? ·%~\
\ ._;_' -._'t-..:•~
"" ~~~ ' Ir . .';t. -~J;',: , ·-r .: ' r' ; ' . i
. ' . I I
!• .-
i ~
• i' l
I '
t.
i
. ' (
t
-I I I •
'·
;
!
' ;
~-i ,,
~: :i
,,
,l
;~
:~ ·: ~-; ,·
'• t;
.i )r.· ·~ .,J,
~'\\-~ "--~
... ~~J
. ..:,
·--------------·---f------1----1:---
·----------1---1---~---f---
-------1----1----1----+----e---
·····------·---1-----1----1----f---
•---------1-----j------t----l-----j.---
····--•-·---1----1------j'-----l-----
--. ---------··--------------, ____ ,_ __ ---------
··--·-·---------~--------------------------------
·--------·------1-----1---I----I----
·--·--··-----------tl----l-----l-----1-----
·-----------· -----1-----1----1----1----
-----····--·---/-----+----e----1--~
----------1----/-----+---+-----l----
----·------··l--'----l-----l---1-------1----
----------·-·--l,----t----f----1----
t:s;.:~ie ~~ 'ti~· ~~~'1 ,, .• ~:-' ~<,,!fJ:•. Ii. ' ~';¾ :-~'. . ::· ' "-'· :-••,;,-... -~"".""'. ~N, 1ii:ii ,~,\I '"'!~--~,: ••J' h' :!( t•. ::~~-·?. ~~,~~ j~ .. ~~~ ~ 1•.-;"'; . -~----1·-·-·---------------------· ----1----1----------------------------------~-~--------,----..... --------1----1----1----+--------------1----1----+----I----~~ .-.,!,;/..:-. . • ,.,_,. . &'>~ . ¥--~ • ~-:-: ~--s~ ,:.:~~ --· ·-~---------••. ---• -~ ,..c, ------~ ...... "'""'' ---'-------""
'1 • :---i -------------1--·-------1---+---. ·--· ---------·-----------· -·--------~-----·---·1----1-------------------------1---+----1----f----------------~ ------1---l-----+----I-----· -------· ·---·----·--------~--------1----1--------------------------1-------i-----t----' ----------1----1----------1----1----------·---------1----1----1---------~ ·--·-----·· ··-------1---------1---1---::,.,i.;.~ f'-' . • • -¥ iir~•t' __ ~~-:;v:~,-!i--:*I ·-,. . . _<r_,.,,.~f"-<_,,_1.,,, __ -_•_ e,ei __ -. :afZX@11h·•·--1:,l-:t4-'.t'~1-,r:-;.b:";¾'.r£.--~~ .. 1:~:~:"-1..;~1-6.·~,:.::· , + ~-'-' •:.l ~ :S•." ~~-~-~ !..,,_. '"'"-·-: ._ ••• '< _ ~ •~.,;:•. • .'t►• . ...,;;...~~'-"<':i.~ ~ •.'t _ ff.~.:::.;;:.~.:,. . ~'\t"' ~--r-~ :;,,.,-~--+4~y-:: j'!;~.,;-~~7'.~~. r.,;,;,-..,_,.,. -,,... , . , • 11?> (.,, --u, • ,,(' -• ',?-!•_ .---~--~---, .... '• -:, ---
,. :i :: ,:,;._ ...
-~-·
'
,,
.. -·----------------· --~1---1--~•1---
·--·---··-···· ---··--·-···· ---------. -----1---1---
~ -j -·---· •• ---• --------·. I -----------. --······--.. 1-----
, ------------·----··--,~--,-~-,--------------. k -1-1 .I, -I -1--1--1
. 1 l 1 ----~l~ti'-C ,:,.,A<: -V' "'if /J' ""'T ~-
_.I!•~:-··::: ------~--~:-------------------------· -==G~ tir ~~ -t_.(;I~JJ_,,,j.,:L~JJ~l
1
DI --.
) ~:•=•:-~ ~--____ -____ =-----------1-====:===:==== :]~:*f1c/-tjJ Ji lffi, 11 ,
-·-··----------------~-1-~--1-~-f--~--===r1.J1--°-r-rl-2&'1== IJl~j: _,.vi:: :l1"f_f1J19J--: --------------------------,-~,--------= = t-.:--_ = _6-1:i'~~-Jf-:: ""'1 11t:'. -1-.11 1--?flii --
:~~---~-:~-~-•~-==:=----· -:=~-~~ 1~--~ -· (l~1=~1~_~:tJ=~-:_JJi='n~~-~1~----~~-:==----· -T(1 ' A -' ---fi'-. I' -I~ y-_y_ -' -------
-----r~--+-________ --1. _ -1 _ _ . 11 ===':ft ~I~-_::;.;~.~ i _. :J·--; lti~ _:_:: . t , ~ ---_:: ~
_-:--. ·~ : ~~: -~:--~ ~~---· ---·,. · ___ --_------~ _----=-1----.. -_ ~ =~fjJ.)~~ -• . . -1~ -L =f=I -51 ·. -:: __ : -=
·-----·------------1-----+-----1-----+---• ---1~-:k--------_,~: --;,~,f-h ----~_:: ===
-~~ •.• ·~-~-~--~_--_-__ ,=_--=--=:I=-=-_=_~'=-~=+~=----~= =:rtif Jtl l{f rt.1~1~1~1---~r llJ1=l~ ~}~ =:
_ --------· . ----++ :_: ! !_, I-· 1-1-1-=I~:: -:: _-IJ_ t~-i::::~=
(. -VJ--'1
.. ·-•••"
!~
~::'.,; .,_::. .... ,-_-_ ---~ -_ .. ·-~-~ ··-:_,,,,,:!.H:;.;-,;? .: ...• --•. , '. -•. ---< -
:-_ .-.
-',:
... / .. -~ -~
~:i, ;ii ~:4--
. "
·····---·------1-----1------
------· ----------1-----1-----11----
----~--------1-----1-----1-----
_____ , _____ , ______ ------
. ·----------------1------1-----1-----
----------------1------1
~%·:.:--.. i~~it ·,.. £::..,·_ ~~-'. !:.';B'~~-"' '.....:..:~'ll.. -__ ._;_., -~. ,:•-~~':; ., ~-... •-)_ ~.: .a:
I---------
REF. 13
• -
I POTENTIAL HAZARDOUS WASTE SITE L IDENTIFlCATION
oEPA PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT 01 STA.TE,0.Z SITE~
NC D000813592 PART 1 • Sl'TE INFORMATION AND ASSESSMENT
I IL SITE NAME AND LOCATION
Qt $tT'E~a...--------..., 02 STREET. JIOJTE NO-. 0A SPl0FlC 1,.DCA~ ICEHTlFEII
Georcria-Pacific Com. -Hard\=:xi Sav.mi.11 Pl -Dr..: ......
o,cm OASTATE 001JPC00E OOCOIMTY 07~, QICONO
I C00E asr
Plyrrouth NC 27962 Washington 094 01
oa COORCtNA TES LAnTUCE I LONGll\JDE -·
I 35..... .52-2.li.... ..O'.ZE-44-:ZS....
10 Ol=tECTIONS TC SITE~._ __ ,..__ ·
Fran East Main street in Plym:,..ith, turn north onto Pl~ Drive and go amut 1500
feet to the site. I -. --
DL RESPONSIBLE PARTIES
010WNER,. ....... ·-· -· . -028T111EET--. ...... ,__. ' I Georgia-Pacific Coro. ·• .. P.O. Bax 105603 .. -.
o.scm . -. -··· . ----CM STATE CO 1J1' CODE 00TEL.EPN0NE......,,
Atlanta ---..... GA 30348 404 l 521-4000
I 07 OP£RATOR ,. __ .,,.,.... _ _, .. ·-----· Dl&TREET-.--.. __.
--·-· . .. -
011cm --... : 1OSTATE 11 ZIPC00E , 2 1'E.D'H0NE .....asER
I .. . _ . ._ . ( ) -
13 TYPE OF OWNERSHIP ,o...__,
II( A.. PRIii A TE □ B. FEDERAL.: □ C.STATE □D.CCUNTY □ E. i.aJNICIPAL --I □ F.Oll!ER: □a.UNKNOWN '
' 14 OWNERIOPEJIIATOfl NQlPCATION ON A..1.0,.,. •-~ . ----
ll!!A..ACRA300I DA~RECSi/EO: J J ,J2 BO C L LWC0NT'R0U.ED WASTESITE,clJICI.A tNc DATE RECEIVED: . . □ C.NOtE
IOfflol 0.Y ftM W0HTN Q&'f ftM
I N. CHARAcnRIZATION OF POTEHT\AL HAZARD-'-·--.-·-
010N~NSPECTJON ----.-,. IIYO-•-__,, · ...
; . . □A.EPA. □ B. EPA CONTRACTOR □ C.STATE □ D. OTHBI~ --. --
□YES DATE ----. □ I!:. LDCALIEAl.nl OFRC1A1. □F.O'THBI: .. )QNO . ...,. DD'.,.... -·· --
I ·---·~·--CCINTIIACTtllfNME(S): -· . . . ..
02 SITE STATUS~--GlffAMO,CPBIATDll -. ---·--·-:..-..
□ A. ACl1IIE □ B. IW:'TIIIE .. ji·c. -. ·_. . ---.. :· .. .. Pre iqso I □UNKNOWN ,. --· -·--· .. -
I
_,.... ...........
04 0ESQIIPT'ICIN o, IUDTANCE.a PClllal.Y l'fl!SENT. JCNOWN. CIIIA&J.212D .
'1ru.s facility was-purchasea ftau Atias -p1 ywcod in 1950. 'lbe ex:isti.o, buildin;s \.ere ..
danolished·and new str=tures:l::utlt:-..0.---j>.fter a fire in 1983, the plant was pe=anenily ·-
I closed. Reportedly; Georgia-Pac~. -1~ owns the site. ..
06 OEacM'TCIN o,; ~ NA.ZM1D TO BJMC I IBff NGfalll'CIP\LAlDt
Since the facility has been :i.I, opeLdL...00 for at least 35 years, and since pre-1950 pi:cxe.:
I and waste hamliD;. practices are-uix::Iear; this site ~s a tine-available on-site·--
inspection. I ..•.•. ·---· :-•·· ·--· ·/--.. -:-: • -· .. ., .. . ..... --
' . -· .. .·•
Y. PRK>RJTY ASSESSIIEHt -.
I 01 ~PCftNSI ECII.IN,.:a.--•---•--•------;,._•~------~••O.-...-'WC:.....W----
□A..HDH CLMBIUol C.LC1W CD.NONE . .. ·-,...._...,........,. . ------.. _____ ......... ,.. ___________ ....,
I VL INFORMATION AVAD AIII EFROII . . ··--
01 CONTACT .... ,. .,. TEI.EPIOE-
Tern Stevens, Enviro. Enaineer Georcria-Pacific Co,..,.,. 14041 521-5080
°' PERSON R£SP0NS1a1..E FOR ,sac:nrrrr .. _.. DI c:Jfll»NV,TIQN 07 T£L.EPtt0Nt.....ulEII ooi,,.Tl
I Grover Nicholson NC DHR/D!E SHW »:;int. Br. 819 1733-2178 ]2 ~lfi ,85
..:.tTN °'" ftM
EPA fOP,M 2070-'2 (7 .. 11
l -·---·.J -
\ .-. -:,
\ ·'--: -:.
, . ; ~; . --:. __ -::.:..(·--v-------------/.". --/ .
' "' _____, ) ,t:Y-y
_,...,,, _.r ; '
-' ' I I
, ···<'' I
I •• I J ,,
.. 1:..: r.~:;;::.--,,, / L.,,,..,,,
. ....__,-, I .·, -·-~--.-, ,, . _,. ,,.-
(_,f, ~-C::::~=~ . ----.:.-J?~r;
} I-~'.;,~~~:_ ·-· · . _. .---~~~:a;
"'21 ::·.-·~.i.~
-t-
~ __., ...---,, ~:...-. ,._{
~ I -~ :, . •• -4 ,_, . ,.,
.~--) ,-,I,,_; . /
. "".,--
\~/ . ... --~
'' .. I ,,,--.....,_
I 1 ,q , . ' t)
\
~~ • I : .,,,.: .
•1 . '"'x~
I I ,---\ fi~ . .. _/ .. :· ~o\
•• ·-J:~:i1 ~-. I : ~"-"'
"I, ••O 197' ••G•<T<C •0"" . 1--------........ " 0,
-~---~~
:-:~
-
-
NORTH CAROLINA
7.5 MINUTE SERIES (TOPOGRAPHIC)
---::::::::,;.___: '
SCALE 1:2400J
CONTOUR INTERVAL 5 FEET
NATIONAL GEODETIC VERTIC,t,L DATUM OF 1929
StlOAE.LINE SI-IOWN REPA(S[NIS IHt APPRu•1MAI( ll"'[ uF ,,.lAN .. ,i; ... WAl[A
l1-1( M[AN JU.NGf. Cf TIO[ IS l(SS TH"N ', fC'QI
~--
,_;
--J·
NUS REF. 14
CORPORATION
_ 7 LAKESIDE PARKWAY
SUITE 614
TUCKER. GEORGIA 30084
,-938-7710
I
ID
I d
1n
I~
I 1'
Ii
II
II
II
I --1
11
11
11 ,.
'-ii
!JI
August 20, 1990
Mr. A. R. Hanke Date: Q
I
C-586-B-0-165
Waste Programs Branch Site Disposition: .:_: . ..:~.·-1· f· b:Ll~ ~2
Waste Management Division
Environmental Protection Agency
345 Courtland Street, N. E.
Atlanta, Georgia 30365
EPA Project Manager:)) i.-~r·, \ c+-' r-... \, ~r-:. r (..: .. J
Subject: -· · Screening Site Inspection, Phase I
Georgia Pacific Corporation Hardwood Sawmill
, Plymouth, Washington County, North Carolina
EPA ID No. NCD000813592
TDD No. F4-8909-89
Dear Mr. Hanke:
'--' ~
FIT 4 conducted a Phase I Screening Site Inspection at the Georgia Pacific Corporation Hardwood
Sawmill located in Plymouth, Washington County, North Carolina. This assessment included a review
of EPA and state file material, completion of a target survey, and an offsite reconnaissance of the'
facility and surrounding area.
The Georgia Pacific Sawmill is located on Plywood Drive in Plymouth, North Carolina. Geographically
the facility is located at 35°52'35" N latitude and 76°45'30" W longitude (Ref. 1). The 25-acre tract of
land on which the facility is located was purchased from Atlas Plywood in 1950, whereupon the
pre-1950 structures were demolished, and the planer-sawmill-office building complex was
constructed. After a fire in 1983, the plant was permanently closed (Refs. 2, 3). Currently, the Outer
Banks Contractors, Inc., Plant Number 4, makes asphalt at the Plywood Drive address and is owned by
Decatur Partnerships of Naggshead, North Carolina (Ref. 4).
Operations at the Georgia Pacific facility included the production of treated and nontreated
hardwood lumber (Refs. 3, 5). Process wastes associated with the plant consisted primarily of spent oil
(D000-ignitable/D007-chromium, D0OS-lead), spent halogenated degreasing agents (FOO 1 ), spent
nonhalogenated solvents (F003, FOOS), bottom sediment sludge from the treatment of wastewaters
from the wood preserving processes, and an insecticide formulation. The preservative used, Noxtane
(trade name), was manufactured by the Koppers Company of St. Louis, Missouri and contained
pentachloropheneate, sodium metaborate, and other chlorophenols. The insecticide formulation
contained lindane (Refs_. 3, 5, 6, 7). During the process of wood preserving, lumber was passed
through a dip vat on a conveyor system. After removal from the preservative or insecticide
formulation, the wet wood was allowed to drip dry onto the ground, thus contaminating the soil
(Ref. 3). Annual waste production at the facility included 20,000 pounds of D000, D007, D00S waste,
16,300 pounds of K00l (bottom sediment sludge from the treatment of wastewaters from wood
preserving processes that use pentachlorophenal) with lindane, and 375 pounds of FOOi, F003, FOOS
waste (Ref. 5). A RCRA Part A application indicated that the wastes were stored in drums (Ref. 5).
I
B
I
D
I
'0 I
ID
I~
i~
I UI
11
I I
I I
i I
I I
••
•1 • ,
1, 1,
1.1
••• I
Mr. A.R. Hanke
Environmental Protection Agency
TDD No. F4-8909-89
August 20, 1990 · page two
During a RCRA Inspection conducted in October 1981, representatives from the North Carolina
Department of Human Resources (~JCDHR) discovered that the wastes were being burned in the
facility boilers and/or sent to the county landfill (Ref. 3). It was also noted during the inspection that
the wood treatment process involved spilling waste directly on the ground (Ref. 3). A tank used in the
wood treatment process was also found to be leaking (Refs. 7, 8). Remedial action plans were
initiated by NCDHR in November 1981, but no removal has yet taken place (Refs. 9, 10, 11 ).
The facility submitted a RCRA Part A application for a hazardous waste permit on November 12, 1980
(Ref. 5). In August 1982. the facility's status was changed from a treatmenUstorage/disposal (TSD) and
generator facility to a small-quantity generator (Ref. 12). According to NCDHR representatives and
file material, the Georgia Pacific facility is currently listed as a conditionally exempt, small-quantity
generator due to its inactive status (Refs. 11, 13).
The Georgia Pacific Hardwood Sawmill facility is located in the Atlantic Coastal Plain hydrogeologic
regime. This regime cons1Sts of complexly interbedded sand, silt, and clay overlying unconsolidated
sand, silt, and clay. The slope of the interlayered beds toward the ocean controls groundwater flow
(Ref. 14). Washington County has a moist, temperate climate with a net annual rainfall of 7 inches
and a 1-year, 24-hour rainfall of 3.5 inches (Refs. 15, 16).
East of Plymouth, in the town of Roper, the formations found in cross section are 15 feet of surficial
deposits, 200 feet of sand and marl of the Yorktown Formation, and the limestones of the Castle
· Hayne Formation. The section is shown to thin as one goes from east to west; however, one can
extrapolate that although the Yorktown Formation will be thinner, it will exist underneath Plymouth
(Ref. 17, p. 56). The surficial deposits are rarely used as sources for potable water. Domestic wells
sometimes use the Yorktown Formation for potable water sources (Ref. 18). The aquifer normally
used in the northwestern part of Washington County is the Castle Hayne aquifer (Ref. 17, p. 53). This
aquifer consists of limestone and sand and is generally confined. Regionally, it is found 70 to 200 feet
below land surface (bis) (Ref. 19). Well depths in the Plymouth area range from 110 to 214 feet deep.
More recently, in western Plymouth, the Castle Hayne aquifer is found 150 feet bis. Through artesian
effect, the water levels were either flowing above ground or less than 10 feet bis (Ref. 17,
pp. 55, 76, 77). Because of much withdrawal from the aquifer, the water level is now about 28 feet bis
(Ref. 20)
The layer of marl and sand found in Plymouth represents the layer of lowest hydraulic conductivity
between the aquifer and the surface. Marl and sand of this type have been shown to have hydraulic
conductivities thatrange from 1 x 10-5 and 1 x 10-7 cm/sec (Ref. 21) .
Residents within the study area obtain their water from one of three sources: the city of Plymouth
Water Works, the Washington County system which obtains water from the city of Plymouth Water
Works, and private well use. The city of Plymouth Water Works uses of four wells having an average
depth of approximately 175 feet and two water tanks having capacities of 250,000 and
500,000 gallons (Refs. 1, 22). The four wells are located between 1.3 to 2.0 miles from the facility and
serve 5,000 people. The county system serves 3,900 people, including residents in a limited area
adjacent to the city of Plymouth (Refs. 1, 23). Private well use within the 4-mile radius is limited to
108 residences located near the periphery of the 2-to 3-mile radius and 337 residences located within
the 3-to 4-mile radius, making the total private well use within the 4-mile radius 445 residences
(Ref. 1). Private wells within the study area are generally 200 ± feet deep (Ref. 22). The closest
private well is located on Route 1 approximately 2.7 miles from the facility (Ref. 1) .
NUS CORPORATION
Mr. A.R. Hanke
Environmental Protection Agency
TDD No. F4-8909-89
August 20, 1990 -page three
Judging from the topographic relief, the Georgia Pacific facility is most probably located in a flood
plain (Ref. 1 ). Surface water runoff from the facility would flow 530 feet overland to the Roanoke
River, then continue 6 miles to Albemarle Sound (Ref. 1). No surface water intakes are located along
the IS-mile extended migration pathway (Ref. 24) Recreational use of local waters includes
swimming, fishing, and boating.
Access to the facility is limited by fencing and a gate guardhouse (Ref. 21). The nearest residence is
located approximately 700 feet east of the facility (Ref. I). The local high school and a Dixie Youth
League baseball park are located in the residential area adjacent to the facility (Ref. 21).
Approximately 2,700 individuals live within 1 mile of the facility, and the total population for the
study area is 7,477 (Refs. I; 13, 25). Land northeast of the city ·of Plymouth and north of the Roanoke
River is primarily uninhabited freshwater wetland (Ref. I).
The bald eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus) is a federally and state-designated endangered species
found in Washington County. Additionally: the Waccamaw killifish (Fundulus waccamenis) and the
golden eagle (Aguila chrysaetos) are state-designated endangered and threatened species,
respectively, that are found in this county (Ref. 26).
Due to the low probability that drinking water will be impacted by wastes associated with the prior
operations, it is the opinion of FIT 4 that no further remedial action be planned for the Georgia Pacific
Corporation Hardwood Sawmill facility. If there are any questions concerning the information
contained within this report, please contact me at NUS Corporation.
Approved:
LTM/gwn
Enclosures
cc: Robert Morris
NUS CORPORATION
, I
.. •'
'' , .... '; '
.,,
I
I
I
1•
I
I I
I
I
I
I I
I I
I
I
D
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
r~ .,;-·..,,a~•·"'•..;~\. Mir; 1 "-~:i'
1.:" '~rnfh.··" .· i;i -~ . "" .. ~, t\ '~ I VI · . i
n~ . .. : .,,,~ . -.,.•
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health; and Natural Resources
Division of Solid Waste Management
P.O. Box 27687 · Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687
James G. Martin, Governor
William W. Cobey, Jr., Secretary
Ms. Kathy Amoroso
Apr i 1 2 2, 19 9 2
EPA NC CERCLA Project Officer
EPA Region IV Waste Division
345 Courtland Street, NE
Atlanta, Georgia 30365
RE: Phase II, Screening Site Investigation
Georgia-Pacific Hardwood Sawmill
Plymouth, Washington County, North Carolina
NCD 000 813 592
Dear Ms. Amoroso:
William L. Meyer
Director
Enclosed herewith is the Phase II, Screening Site Investigation
(SSI) Report by Greenhornc & O'Mara, Inc. for Georgia-Pacific
Hardwood Sawmill (NCD 000 813 592).
Based on the information gathered and presented in this report
and on the results of the data validation, it is believed that
the site may pose a threat to the public health and/or the
environment.
The following discussion of the analytical results from the Phase
II, SSI sampling event for the subject site, reflects data
validation.
A total of nine (9) environmental samples were collected to
characterize the site. To characterize whether a release of
contamir1ants has occurred, a limited subsurface and sur[icial
investigation was conducted to obtain ground water, soil and
sediment samples for laboratory analysis. The sampling locations
are shown on Appendix A, Figure 2b. Tl1ese samples consisted of
three (3) ground water samples, four (4) soil samples and two (2)
sediment samples.
-1-
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer
I
I
I
I I I
I
~·
I I
I
I
I
I I
I
I
I n
I
D
I
R
I I,
E
I
I
I\
Soils
A background surface soil sample (GWSS0l) was collected at the
site. No Purgable Organics were reported above CRDL in this
sample. No Base Neutral Acid Extractables (BNAs) were reported
above CRDL in this sample. No PCBs or Pesticides were reported
above CRDL in this sample. See Table 1 for the inorganic
results.
A composite soil sample (GWSS02) was collected in the green chain
area at the site. No Purgable Organics were reported above CRDL
in this sample. Pentachlorophenol (690J ppb), chrysene (l00J
ppb) and benzo[a]pyrene (l00J ppb) were the only BNAs reported in
this sample. A qualifier of ''J'' indicates that the concentration
was estimated. Alpha BHC (640XE ppb), beta BHC (77XP ppb), delta
BHC (560XE ppb), gamma BHC (lindane) (1200XE ppb), 4,4'~DDT (170
ppb) and toxaphene (450XJP ppb) were the only PCBs or Pesticides
reported in this sample. A qualifier of ''X'' indicates that the
contaminant may or may not be present. A qualifier of "E"
indicates that the contaminant value may be semi-quantitative. A
rerun of this sample gave Alpha BHC (470 ppb), beta BHC (78U
ppb), delta BHC (480 ppb), gamma BHC (lindane) (980 ppb), 4,4'-
DDT (170C ppb) and toxaphene (l000U ppb). A qualifier of ''C''
indicates that the contaminant concentration is confirmed by
GCMS. See Table 1 for the inorganic results.
A composite soil sample (GWSS03) was collected in the transformer
station area. No Purgable Organics were reported in this sample.
No BNAs were reported in this sample. Aroclor 1254 (1.08 ppb)
was the only PCB and/or Pesticide reported in this sample. See
Table 1 for the inorganic results. The first value in
parenthesis is for totals and the second value is for TCLP.
A composite soil sample (GWSS04) was collected in the TCE area.
No Purgable Organics were reported in this sample. No BNAs were
reported in this sample. No PCBs and/oL Pesticides were reported
in this sample. See Table 1 for the inorganic results.
An observed release to soils has been documented from the data
gathered relative to the soil samples. It appears that there are
releases of alpha BHC, delta BHC, gamma BHC (lindane), 1,4'-DDT,
Aroclor 1254, arsenic, barium, calcium, chromium, cobalt, copper,
lead, magnesium, manganese and potassium. Even though the
inorganics reported in the soil samples were within naturally
occurring concentrations for inorganics in the Eastern United
States, the presence of arsenic, chromium and copper raises
concern of possible past CCA treatment even though there is no
knowledge of this treatment ever occurring at the site based on
available information.
Sediments
A background sediment sample was not collected at the site.
-2-
I
I
:I
\
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
0
I u
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
A sediment sample (GWSEDOl) was collected from a ditch adjacent
to the lumber stack area. No Purgable Organi~s were detected in
this sample. No BNAs were reported in this sample. Aroclor 1254
(0.30 ppb) was the only PCB and/or Pesticide reported in this
sample. Barium (27/0.42 ppm) and lead (27/non-detect ppm) were
the only inorganics reported in this· sample. All inorganics
reported in this sample were within naturally occurring
concentrations for inorganics in the Eastern United States.
A sediment sample (GWSED02) was collected from a ditch adjacent
to the TCE area. No Purgable Organics were reported in this
sample. No BNAs were reported in this sample. No PCBs or
Pesticides were reported in this sample. Arsenic (9.8/0.05 ppm),
barium (45/0.62 ppm), cadmium (160/non-detect ppm) and l~ad
(20/non-detect ppm) were the only inorganics reported in this
sample. All inorganics, except for cadm-ium (0.01-0.7 ppm),
reported in this sample were within naturally occurring
concentrations for inorganics in the Eastern United States.
Even though a background sediment sample was not collected, it is
assumed that an observed release to surface waters relative to
sediment samples is documented from the data gathered relative to
sediments samples. Both of these ditches lead to the Roanoke
River. It appears that there is a release of Aroclor 1254 and
possibly arsenic, cadmium and lead to sediments.
Ground Water
A background ground water (GWGWOl) was collected at the site. No
Purgable Organics were detected in this sample. Dietl1ylphthalate
2J ppb) was the only BNA reported in this sample. Heptachlor
(0.31 ppb) and alpha chlordane (0.28 ppb) were the only PCBs
and/or Pesticides reported in this sample. See Table 2 for the
inorganic results.
A downgradie~t ground water sample (GWGW02) was collected in the
green chain area. No Purgable Organics were reported in this
sample. No BNAs were reported in this sample. Alpha BHC (0.12
ppb), beta BHC (0.045J ppb), delta BHC (0.13 ppb) and gamma BHC
(lindane) (0.32 ppb) were the only PCBs and/or Pesticides
reported in this sample. See Table 2 for the inorganic results.
A downgradient ground water sample (GWCW03) was collected in the
TCE area. Chloroethane (990 ppb) and 1,2-dichloroethene (total)
(19J ppb) were the only Purgable Organics reported in this
sample. Naphthalene (lJ ppb), diethylphthalate (2J ppb) and
pyrene (lJ ppb) were the only BNAs reported in this sample. No
PCBs and/or Pesticides were reported in this sample. See Table 2
for the inorganic results.
An observed release to ground water has beP.n documented from the
data gathered relative to ground water samples. It appears that
significant releases of alpha BHC, delta BHC, gamma BHC
I
I
1•
I
I I I
I I
I
I
I
I I
I
I
I
I
I
D
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
(lindane), chloroethane, 1,2-dichloroethene (total), arsenic,
beryllium, manganese and sodium have occurred at the site. As
can be seen from Table 2, several of the inorganics are greater
than the NCMCL and/or MCL. These contaminants are not known to
be attributable to site activities, but the presence of arsenic
in significant concentrations raises c6ncern over possible past
site activities (CCA treatment).
Based on the information gathered and presented in this report,
it is believed that the site may pose a threat to human health
and/or the environment, therefore, the North Carolina Superfund
Section is recommending that the site move on to the next stage
of the pre-remedial process. This investigation should focus on
identifying whether contamination to surface waters has resulted
from runoff from the site. Further information must be gathered
on past activities at the site to better identify whether CCA
treatment has ever occurred.
If you have any questions, please contact me at 919-733-2801.
erely, ;}½
,,,._ C /J,-;,t._, i ---
er Nicholso,, Head
_on_racts Management Branch
Enclosures
-4-
I
11
1,
I SOILS
TABLE 1
GEORGIA-PACIFIC
NCD 000 813 592
I NATURAL
RANGE GWSSOl GWSS02 GWSS03 GWSS04
I =~~~~~==:---~~~~2-------~~~~2-----~~~~2-----~~~~2------~~~~2 __
I ALUMINUM
. ANTIMONY I ARSENIC
I BARIUM
BERYLLIUM
I CADMIUM
CALCIUM I CHROMIUM
I COBALT
COPPER
I IRON
LEAD I MAGNESIUM
I MANGANESE
MERCURY
I NICKEL
I POTASSIUM
SELENIUM
I SILVER
SODIUM
II THALLIUM
D VANADIUM
\ZINC D CYANIDE
\NOTES:
0.7->10%
<1-8.8
<0.1-73
10-1500
<1-7
0.01-0.7
0.01-20%
1-1000
<0.3-70
<1-700
0.01->10%
<10-300
0.005-5%
<2-7000
0.01-3.4
<3-700
0 . 0 0 5 - 3 . 7.%
<0.1-3.9
0.01-5
0.05-5%
<7-500
<5-2900
7000 5600 NA
20UR 20UR NA
3U JU 32/0.07
29 320 .220/1.0
0.26 0.34 NA
lU lU U/0.08
580 79000 NA
8.1 8. 3 40/U
l.3U 5.3 NA
3. 0 23 NA
6900 5600 NA
5.8 33 110/U
380 3600 NA
42 850 NA
0.29U 0.28U NA
4 . 1 9.8 NA
470 1800 NA
0.26U lU u
1. 3U 1. 3U u
250U 480U NA
0.53U 0.53U NA
13 11 NA
29 81 NA
u u NA
I 1 )
2 )
3)
4 )
5)
NA -NOT ANALYZED
N -PRESENCE OF CONTAMINANT PRESUMED
J -CONCENTRATION ESTIMATED
U -NON-DETECT
B -CONTAMINANT FOUND IN. ASSOCIATED BLANK
6) R -DATA UNUSABLE
I
I
I
I
•;·
NA
NA
10/0.02
30/0.58
NA
u
NA
u
NA
NA
NA
20/U
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
u
u
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
I
I
1•
TABLE 2
GEORGIA-PACIFIC
NCD 000 813 592
I WATER WATER
NCMCL MCL GWGWOl GWGW02 GWGW03 I INORGANICS (PPB) (PPB) (PPB) (PPB) (PPB)
I ALUMINUM 300000J 690000J 20000J
I ANTIMONY 10/5 42UR 42UR 42UR
\ ARSENIC 50 2UJ 6UJ 43J
•
BARIUM 1000 5000 lOOOJ 2900J 960J
BERYLLIUM 1 2J 12J lUR
\ CADMIUM 5 5 4UJ 4UJ 4UR
•
CALCIUM 130000J 170000J 210000J
CHROMIUM 50 100 340J 740J 81J
I COBALT 76J lOOJ llJ
I COPPER 1000 1300 llOJ 270J 31J
IRON 300 310000J 340000J 71000J
LEAD 50 50 270J 170J 140J
\MAGNESIUM 25000J 40000J 28000J
IMANGANESE 50 1300J 6000J 4300J
MERCURY 1.1 2 1.7J l.5J 0.20UR
tNICKEL 150 100 150J 420J 52J
OPOTASSIUM 20000J 49000J 36000J
SELENIUM 10 50 lUR 20UJ 2UJ
!SILVER 50 SUR SUR SUR
SODIUM 8000J 6500J 96000J
DTHALLIUM 2/1 2UJ 2UJ 2UJ
DvANADIUM 540J 920J 42J
\zINC sooo 330J 940J 320J
•rYANIDE 154 200 U U u
•
NOTES:
I
I
I
I
I
I
1) NA -NOT ANALYZED
2) N -PRESENCE OF CONTAMINANT PRESUMED
3) J -CONCENTRATION ESTIMATED
4) U -NON-DETECT
5) R -DATA UNUSABLE
6) B -CONTAMINANT FOUND IN THE ASSOCIATED BLANK
7) NCMCL -NORTH CAROLINA MAXIMUM CONTAMINANT LEVEL
8) MCL -FEDERAL MAXIMUM CONTAMINANT LEVEL
I I
I I
I I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I I
0
I
D I
D
I
I ~ I
ml
I
I
I
I
I
'MEMORANDUM
TO: File
FROM: G.Doug Rumford r!Jf!!:)
DATE: 10/31/96
REF. 16
SUBJECT: Georgia-Pacific Corp. Hardwood Sawmill
Plymouth, Washington County, NC
NCD 000 813 592
Telecon with Mark Wassersug of Georgia-Pacific Corp.
On this day I spoke with Mark Wassersug of Georgia-Pacific Corp. in Atlanta, GA (404-
652-6871) regarding the former hardwood sawmill site in Plymouth, NC. Mr. Wassersug
informed me that the facility was closed in 1983 following a devastating fire that leveled several
buildings. The entire 24 .11 acre property was then deeded to Decatur Partnerships by Georgia-
Pacific Corp. on January 2, 1985. Hazardous waste types and production rates were constant
during the years of operation at the plant (1950-1983). However, hazardous waste disposal
practices at the site are unknown. The sawmill was served by an on-site production well and
septic system during the period of operation. Seventy-five workers were employed at the plant.
REF. 17
United States
Geological
Survey
Water-Supply
Paper 2242
a ,r,"f;~"': .. -1'~;: s~i.t ,~r 10. ATLANTIC AND GULF COASTAL PLAIN ><,a (Complexly interbedded sand, silt, and clay) ~.: ~t\, The Atlantic and Gulf Coast~] Plain region is an l ';f,_f;• area of about 844.000 km' extending from Cape Cod. (~·-, Mass., on the north to the Rio Grande in Texas on the ,,~~(_.;_ south. This region does not include Florida and parts of (t __ ;.~--the adjacent States: although t.hose ar.eas are~ part o.fthe (,,' · Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain phys10graph1c province, ¥;t.t~ they together form a separate gro~nd-water region. (See 11:-t~ region I I, "Southeast Coastal Plain.") il .,,.... The Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain region ranges :,;," -in width from a few kilometers near its northern end to .12Ir11e nearl)' a thousand kilometers in the vicinity of the Missis-,:r::"'l'~ ... -I~,..-sippi River. The great width near the Mississippi reflects :;:·. the effect of a major downwarped zone in the Earth's .. '-~.;. crust that extends from the Gulf of Mexico to about the
ll'.,"' connuence of the Mississippi and Ohio Rivers (fig. 29).
This area is referred to as the Mississippi embayment.
_ ~-:~ The topography of the region ranges from exten-flJ,.;,-':.. sive, flat, coastal swamps and marshes l to 2 m above sea I::_,;_~ level to rolling uplands, I 00 to 250 m above sea level, along the inner margin of the region. -:._:
. 1 ":\-~·. The region is underlain by unconsolidated sedi-lt'· 1
~ -· ments that consist principally of sand. silt, and clay y~: transported by streams from the adjoining uplands. r.:'fr,-These sediments, which range in age from Jurassic to the
1.-,u,'.J\i .. _,... present, range in thickness from less than a meter near the :~: inner edge of the region to more than 12.000 min south-
l
!ii.~.~-~~;,_,~-ern Louisiana. The greatest thicknesses are along the
111
~-seaward edge of the region and along the axis of the Jr,..._ Mississippi embayment. The sedimerits were deposited I_·· on floodplains and as deltas where streams reached the I~;-coast and, during different invasions of the region by the c~t sea, were reworked by waves and ocean currents. Thus, ~----the sediments are complexly interbedded to the extent ~~f that most of the named geologic units into which they ·,i.l-.,.. have been divided contain layers of the different types of
1
~ sediment that uhderlie the region. These named geologic ,;.,t{t-_•/ units (or formations) dip toward the coast or toward the
1}1_;r_· __ ,, axis of the Mississippi embayment, with the resul.t that ~~..;...-those that crop out at the surface form a series of bands ,g( roughly parallel to the coast or to the axis of the em bay-s:: ment (fig. 41 ). The oldest formations crop oui along the l~-_t-f .. ___ r_· inner margin of the region, and the youngest crop out in ~1!~ the coastal area. @~, ·. \Vithin any formation the coarsest grained mate-
1,, ·:_'·:' · nals (sand, at places interbedded with thin gravel layers) o/ tend to be most abundant near source areas. Clay and silt * layers become thicker and more numerous downdip (fig. •. lfi:.__41).
le:i· Although sand. silt. and clav. as noted above. are ~_::~~-the principal types o_f material u~derlying the Atlantic , ~';'j!~ and Gulf Coastal Plain. there are also a small amount of :+~--
52 Cround-Water Regions of the United States
--·----------·--··--·------------------.
gravel interbedded with the sand, a few beds composed of mollusk shells, and a small amount of limestone present in the regiori. The most important limestone is the semi-consolidated Castle Hayne Limestone of Eocene age which underlies an area of about 26.000 km2 in eastern North Carolina, is more than 200 m thick in much of the area, and is the most productive aquifer in North Caro-lina. A soft, clayey limestone (the chalk of the Selma Group) of Late Cretaceous age underlies parts of eastern Mississippi and western Alabama. but instead of being an aquifer it is an important confining bed .
From the standpoint of well yields and ground-water use, the Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain is one of the most important regions in the country. Recharge to the ground-water system occurs in the interstrcam areas. both where sand layers crop out and by percolation
downward across the interbedded clay and silt layers. Discharge from the system occurs by seepage to streams, estuaries, and the ocean. Movement of water from recharge areas to discharge areas is controlled, as in all ground-water systems. by hydraulic gradients, but in this region the pattern of movement is complicated by down-dip thickening of clay which hampers upward discharge. As a result, movement down the dip of the permeable
layers becomes increasingly slow with increasing distance from the outcrop areaS. This causes many flow lines to converge on the discharge areas located on major streams near the do\Vndip part of outcrop areas. These areas of concentrated ground-water discharge are referred to a_s "artesian-water gaps" by LeGrand and Pettyjohn ( I 981 ). Figure 42 illustrates the effect of an artesian-water gap on heads and flow lines in an ideal situation.
Wells that yield moderate to large quantities of water can be constructed almost anywhere in the region. Because most of the aquifers consist of unconsolidated
sand, wells require screens; where the sand is fine-grained and well sorted, the common practice is to surround the screens with a coarse sand or gravel envel~pe.
Withdrawals near the outcrop areas of aquifers are . rather quickly balanced by increases in recharge and ( or) reductions in natural discharge. Withdrawals at signifi-
---.. ,,,,.::,'' ~~:.,____:__:
, .. ....._ ..
~
' ' .... ,· -
l~~I Fresh water j~j Salty water '
Figure 41. Topographic and geologic features of the Gulf Coastal Plain.
Major stream ---,
Outcrop area · 8re8
2
/ . -----'--'~-:-. nd s·,\t) . . bed \cla'{ a .~?Z: confln,n9 _ .. -• --· . ~~ ..
PLAN VIEW DIAGRAM
Figure 42. Concentration of ground-water discharge near the downdip part of outcrop areas. cant distances downdip do not appreciably affect condi-tions in the outcrop area and thus must be partly or largely supplied from water in storage in the aquifers and confining beds.
The reduction of storage in an aquifer in the vicin-ity of a pumping well is reflected in a decline in ground-water levels and is necessary in order to establish a hydraulic gradient toward the well. If withdrawals are continued for long periods in areas underlain by thick sequences of unconsolidated deposits, such as the Atlan-tic and Gulf Coastal Plain, the lowered ground-water
levels in the aquifer may result ind rainage of water from layers of silt and clay. The depletion of storage in fine-grained beds results in subsidence of the land surface. Subsidence in parts of the Houston area totaled about 9 m as of 1978. Subsidence near pumping centers in the Atlantic Coastal Plain has not yet been confirmed but is believed to be occurring. though at a slower rate than along the Texas Gulf Coast.
The depletion of storage in confining beds is per-manent. and subsidence of the land surface that results from such depletion is also permanent. On the other
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain 53
~i,~.-.f ~ ... ;ot.' .--~ I ~ .. ~.,., Jft)/}1'
I-~?~• ..
. . {fa_ '.ftl.}t ,-.,--.. o ri-'"1 r1 ,~.;~.> Lli)6i§E(C li~tC2ffri1eff1rlL§ =;\ff ,J
I .. ,t·'., •. ·.: •.. ·i'.·~.-~.: __ ·,,.·· (?'~ r" 1r", n r -1 t"_· tTi1 = 'f\ DV, I"?, f:-('Jj r-~ ,_,:; ·-.::.).:u QJJ\Yj,i l:\1,/.:i V, 01~¼,,..,Ll .... ~-:::· --· t , .. ,1e, ~--0 n r~~ a,~;;~, -.. ...f'.J '""'l 1 ;_!/ (2 ,)-n-,ri''(.C•t T/'Y\111. fT'CJ:i.·
,1 \~ .'(· \j \.J . • ..
REF. 18
l,N,•~:~. \', (c',:, Ll tUl I Li\?;.-..:,,_ Li\~ Ii ';; , Ll l:: ~ ~
-~;.ltr o ~ J rt ~ 1 flftl _1:"o~·[mi ~~~~~;tl~a , -· . -, YO i~;. '. . ~ ·· .. _. ,. ,... ·•,c;;,_,:·:'·:::;-c ·.S:c,o, , ■wt: -·: -_ -,---•--.---. .-'. .:~_}_:_;_·_.~,: <,. , ~,:Ji.·. ·. ._.:,:\_ .. \_:~.'.:'". ~ :._;~~'::..:.7'-,:.::3 '· .",(.'··· . · · . .,.. · , ...,., -..... :·. '·?~~-.. .-..... -
' .: . : -...
~~•·r •
I•-• lflt tl,S. GEOi..OGtCAl SURVEY iEfC.: ,,.i"l;t,,-V/ATER RESOIJR.CES ir--JVEST1GAT!01'1S
lijt;··-c,?cr\i··F1LE REt;ORT 80-l;-4 wi~~-.
114~-
,~~
.-tt
r, . , ..
i'i!
~·· r·
Prep2reci in cooperation with the
Nonn C2ro!i.1a Depar:ment of Natural
R,·sour.::es 2nd Co.:imu;-iity Developme;-it
ll'
H" -
...
~
" 0 ,.,
u ;~ ,.,
"' u
u
OJ' 61'
F.XPL/\IJ/\TION
u
~
0 '"' _,
0
FK"t:·-:r·ru,coloo\a·· fofmotion tf]Ui-L.:.'. .. ·.: volcnl ( sands ond clop I
~[w Triassic ,ans
!somJslone nnd conqlome1otes)
~
/-<;,~-~
V 'Ir-J \r 1.
.J "-·,:Z -l .)'\" ,:;-.1,.,~v
.._\...,'\ V ., ~\1,,., \::.t" ,,,,"
®"' f~~~C"/1~ ~ -~t" V D<."''-"
\,/'\=.~
P,~ .. ~~ G1or11l1c
f-:' ~~~~1 M cl omor phoH d s e di men Io r y k,.,:--.:' ond volcanic rocks
([[[[[J Gneiss and SC hist
r-:;-:-~ Moslly micoceous
~ond gneiss SC his r
,,. ,..
--'i
. '
.,
Georgia-Pacific Corp. Hardwood Srnmill
NCO 000 813 592
n•
'<\ L>-c· '\·GL~
~ -'--~..:.-~. , . if,i:,;,.-. .
l~--~~\.·rfock Units and Aquifers
~;t,u;: ·the Coastal Plain :ii'fG!••.1 rn .
~-;iit' l i,'K'~~~ . . tffr" .. :;( -r ~;;:r',r--· t~?'~\~;;;_·· The Coastal Plain of North Carolina is ~~ ~nderlain by sedimentary rocks that were ll!Nt,;r; deposited in w_ater in ,several different layers
ie,~s"'~ which geologists re,er to as formations.
I . ,;cZ~ Formations are commonly given names for
~s::.·. places near which they are exposed at the land
!&~.~:i: surface, for ease in re~erring to them in
~l::i':··-geologic literature.
IS::: Rock layers are normally given names by
;,;:-··· geologists if they have a distinct composition
rn~!.~-.c or, if of variable composition, inciude materials
I"' ~t. deposited during a particular segment of
~~:. geologic time. Named rock units may or may
q~;:( not coincide with hydrologic units so that in tyc~!fi'.:•·~-ground-water reports some aquifers may be
It;:· referred to_ by the formal geologic names used
,'., by geologists, such as the Castle Ha,,ne
-r:ra"ii/::._ Lir11estone and Yorklov,in Formation, and r-.. ,~ ~
I. "-Z..--ethers may be given more informal names, il;:,,.. such as the."Upper aquifer", "Surficial aquifer" i~-~~. or "post-Miocene deposits." The name ml§}B;<. "Surficial _aquifer" indicates the aquifer i_n an_y
l f&P area that 1s closest to land surface and •nus 1s ,iJ;., .. clearly identifiable, regardless of any other ,, .. J! .. ir . names that may have been assigned lo that
ruo-~ /;!i~-~1 : rock unit It:;; . Nr:n·g;ologists concerned both with ground-
~'.\·( watar problems and w_ilh ground-water studies
1:.1•w'.\*-,,_.·: .. 1n the Coastal Plain are probably con-
1,1,ft.,. ~ .... -.. /' I/~.~~ ~~" it:: .1!~ ,~~---~. -
I. ;'.f.';f,;;··
.r~. -r-:;:,; !iill'¾1'",:.
~-Is~
lij,J~-~::·
..--;;:t;.' .••
l~t
i;?,-
Geologic
age
Pleistocene
Pliocene
Miocene
Oligocer:e
Eocene
Paleoce:;e
C;et2.csous
Formation or geologic
na.me
P le i.s tocene deposits
Cree.tan Forroa tion
Yorkto·.~•n Form2tion
Pun;o River Formation
Belc;~2.de Fol."":.1atio::!
River 3end Formation
Castle Hayne Limestone
Be2.ufort Forrn2.tion
Peedee For.nation
Black Creek Formaticn
11 Tuscaloos2.11 :'or~1.s.tion
fused by the different named applied to tc,e
different hycrologic units. The following chart
was prepared in an eifort to elimina.te some of
this confusion. We should note, however, that in
preparing the chart we have neither tried to
include all formation names nor been overly
concerned with the relative geologic age of the
formations. The names used in the last tv,0
columns can be confusing to the extent that al!
units are reierred to as "aquifers." Confining
beds composed of clay occur in all of the
formations and in the formations of Cretaceous
age clay comprises about half of the total
thickness.
The two most important aquifers in the
Coastal Plain are the upper aquifer and the
limestone aquifer. Recharge of the ground-
water system is fro.m precipitation on the land
surfar,e. Therefore, the surficial aquifer has the
largest yield in terms of rate per unit area (for
example, gallons per minute per square mile).
The upper equifer is also most subject to
pollution from land-surface waste disposal. The
limestone aquifer is the most productive aquifer
in North Carolina in terms of yie!ds of individual
wells. Wells capable of yielding more than 1000
gal/min can readily be developed in this
aquifer.
l\2mes used in some Simpliest useful
ground-·,.,·2. ter ·reoorts hydrologic names
Post-Miocene
deposits
Up;ier aquifer
Yorktown
2quifer
C2.stle Hayne c.,~;Jife!' I Li:nes tone 2.quife~
Be2u fort 2ql!ifer
Lc-..:er 2.quifer
Cretaceot.:.s cqi..:if'er
~ I! 22
!t~·t
~-
BIi' ;,,,-;. < ·. ~7;'.,· l !~;f;. ,,..,..; ,?..~ .. ",I, ... , ,. '
~·~r:-The complex inlerlcying: o~ lhe ·sedi:11ents ·
·•· •;; ~~derlyir,g the Co2s:aI Pi21n ,s shown ,n the
P.following cross section. It 1•:ill also be observed
~lfrorn the cross section that the rock layers (end-
~" ;,:
;. ...
23
formations) underlying the Co2st2I Plain di;:,
lowerd the coast 21 a r2te of about 15 ft./mi. /\s a
resul!, each form2tion occurs 2t a gre2ter depth
below !2nd surlace tow2rd the coast. ·
-••oc
·. Stream
,CASTLE
\ I Clay
Recharge a re o
HAYNE AQUIFER
24
~ h l.2.2.2} S e 11 s Limestone
the deepest aquifers occurs only in the central
part of the interstre2rn recharge areas. This is
an important point relative io waste disposal, in that if pollution of the deeper aquifers is to be
avoided, waste disposal sites should be located
as close as possible to perennial streams.
Prior to the construction of drainage ditches
into the central part of the interstream areas,
the water table reached ihe land surface in
these areas dt.!ring the fa!I, winter, and early
,spring recharge season. As a result, water was ponded on the surface· for periods of several
months each year in high-level swamps
reierred to as pocosins.
Two region·a1 aspects of the Coastal Plain are of primary importance from the stcndpoint o: ground-water occurrence and availability. The iirst is the nature of the surficial materials,
which controls the recharge to the ground-wa;er system. The second ·,s the geolog·,c con-
dilions ihat control the occurrence of aquifers and confining beds.
' 1 r ' i
•11,.,,. w:-~¢.;._,.
·~:'' -~~•j:
l
~lg~.-'.~t·
' $i;if,,::.
~~ ........ :;r a.: ,, ,Ji'!,1./:c~-' ..... ~-1151~,, :.; . ~•;:;.:1r~-:zt." .. · l ,..;/L~, ""'''l' .;,~
rroH'It nf'ttttUJt'TDWWSTWi zszm:HMF&il -111
. jf.t::'
l~l.L~YDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY AND TRANSMISSIVITY VALUES
,,.,, t(.f.•,., . ~"ff!=.'-"-FOR TYPICAL NORTH CAROLINA ROCKS AND AQUIFERS Ir ;;;..~-c•·· . · t• ·r•"': ~~ .. : <;-It" • .,,...
~C-
-•.,j~._-· ~
Hydraulic Conductlvlly of Selected Rocks
Hydraulic conductivity {rounded values) . •· (/Vdoy) [(0.11//diiy)/IP] (mi,\era/d.11y)
nPT1f3fC'2::i?xt
lf.i,;7 Maler/al i:f. ;,
-z:.
.j.:,l,,, Coarse sand . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 200 1500 60 ;>,o:, " 10 .z:. l",j,. Medium sand . . . . .. .. .. .. . . . . . . .. .. 130 1000 40 'J-,69 x 10 _4
,7'. Silt ................................ 1 5 0.2 3.53 x ,o_:::.
'•!\-Clay............................... 0.001 0.01 0.0004 3.53 ;< •0 _1
'£:7/,\,, Limestone (Castle Hayne) . . . . . . . . . . 300 2000 80 I • c,c.. x ,c I~:; Saprolite . . . .. .. . . . .. . . .. .. . . .. .. .. . 5 50 2 1, '1-'J. x ,o-!-
' Granite and gneiss .. .. . . .. .. ..... . . . 5 50 2 I.-,-. , ,c·3 1-:,: Slate . . . . . . . .. . . .. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 25 1 1, 06 ,: 10-~ lr,i,-\t:_ .· Hydraulic conductivity replaces the term "field coefficient of permeability" and should be used when . ."r-referring to the water-transmitting characteristic of material in quantitative terms. It is still permissible IU~~trnfer in qualitative terms to "permeable" and "impermeable" material.
\"( -{i;i\l\s:,· Average Values of Hydraulic Conductivity, Thickness, and Transmlsalvlty M1:<.i::.· · for Selected Aquifers In North Carolina .::.
Hydr.11u/lc Conducllvlly Thlckneu Tr.11nsmh1lv!ty
~ti}~,;-·~--Aquifer. Cm. I~ EC... {fl.ld.11y) (It.) (l!l./d11y) 11fj:,;~t-Yor~~own deposits 1.'I-+ x. 10 ·\_ 50 20 1000 :.ij,.Yorktown Formation I, r '1 x 10 50 40 2000 •£:"~Castle Hayne Limestone 1.06 ;< ,o-~ 300 100 30000 l~.~ .. Cretaceous deposits + .or, K ,t>-_3 20 • 200 4000 ~~ Saprolite I . 1 'I Ji Io 5 50 250 l
;r;}!ranite and gneiss . I , 7-7 J,( , o -,, 5 200 1000 r Transmissivity replaces the term "coefficient of transmissibility" because, by convention, an aquifer · rti::::•;::::i"' ;s• :• ':• ;: ::: , ":::~:,,:::m," ts of gmo"d-wa t ec hydco 1 ogy ~~with reference to conditions in North Carolina; U.S. Geological Survey ~rater-Resources ~nvestigations Report 80-44) 11·, H YD"R. ,~ u l-1 L. C....c"-Jt:,t..,;e_.--:-1 v 1 ;-y -...:.r, . .,-(\L ____ r"T ?o,Sc,v./rT l;~~D~...Jvt:: 14-S, c,>--.) r • O~-. -X __ _ ,1 __ .
Dr, ·1 86+= :sc.c.jD1' Y
1i--·
1:·
i .. }
....
I
N FT 3,5 3
-4 X IQ J\J
.5E C.
GEOLOGie'1'1\1ap OF NORTH CAROLINA ' . . ' :, ' . '
'
-------------·-·· ------
. -------.· --~·--:-~
1985
Scale 1:500,000
1 inch equals approximately 8 miles
...
"'
I
mmrme ft illi1fFtFW ___ II
. <·>t~S:i;;:;-~:~:;· i\~ -:~.:: · ~-:.,
\.r;;·:;{(1:tf ~~1f 11~'.'.}:_.j):=J: ·
. xt,t~f iilf :,,:, --· '0
Op
! . Tp I
l:W ,,,; ;;: I
I >tq,?;J;j
Tpy
COAST AL PLAIN .
' ·:~' ·-. -· .... :_:~·
QUATERNARY !:.
SURFICIAL DEPOSITS: UNDi&ioEO :...:·sand: ~lay, gravel. and peat depo-, sited in mari:1e, fllivial, eolian, and lacustrine environments. Quaternary deposits not shown at .:iltitudes greater than approximately 25 feet above mean sea level (Suffolk Scarp, in part)
TERTIARY·
PINEHURST FORMATION -Sand. medium-to coarse-grained, cross-bedding and rhythmic bands of clayey sand common. unconsolidated
TERRACE DEPOSITS AND UPLAND SEDIMENT -Gravel, clayey sand. and sand, minor iron-oxide cen:iented sandstone
WACCAMAW FORMATION -Fossiliferous sand with silt and clay, bluish-gray to tan, loosely consolidated. Straddles Pleistocene-Pliocene boundary
YORKTOWN FORMATION AND DUPLiN FORMATION. UNDIVIDED
Yorktown Formation: Fossiliferous clay with varying amounts of fine-grained sand, bluish gray, shell material commonly concentrated in lenses; mainly in area north of Neuse River
Duplin Formation: Shelly, medium-to coarse-grained sand. sandy marl. and limestone, bluish gray; mainly in area south of Neuse River ~~ BELGRADE FORMATION. UNDIVIDED
Pollocksville Member: Oyster-shell mounds in tan to orange sand matrix. indurated locally
Haywood Landing Member: Fossiliferous clayey sand. gray to brown. Members grade into each other laterally ~~1\ RIVER BEND FORMATION -Limestone. calcarenite overlain by and intercalated with indurated, sandy, molluscan-mold limestone
1111:r&'~ 11·11 lilil ,,,,! I I
Tee
[ Km,
CASTLE HAYNE FORMATION
Spring Garden Member: Molluscan-mold limestone, indurated, very sandy. Grades downward into a calcareous sand and laterally into Comfort Member
Comfort Member and New Hanover Member, undivided
Comfort Member: Bryozoan-echinoid skeletal limestone. locally dolomitized, solution cavities common
New Hanover Member: Phosphate-pebble conglomerate, micritic. th in; restricted to basal part of Castle Hayne Formation in southeast-ern counties
BEAUFORT FORMATION, UNDIVIDED
Unnamed upper member: Sand and silty clay, glauconitic, fossiliferous, and locally calcareous
Jericho Run Member: Siliceous mudstone with sandstone lenses, thin bedded; basal phosphatic pebble conglomerate
CRETA.CEOUS
PEEDEE FORMATION -Sand, clayey sand. and clay. greenish gray to olive black, massive, glauconitic, locally fossiliferous and calcareous. Patches of sandy molluscan-mold limestone in upper part
BLACK CREEK FORMATION -Clay, gray to black. lignitic; contains thin beds and laminae of fine-grained micaceous sand and th·rck lenses of cross-bedded sand. Glauconitic, fossiliferous clayey sand lenses in upper part
MIDDENDORF FORMATION..:... Sand. sandstone. and mudstone. gray to pale gray with an orange cast, mottled; clay balls and iron-cemented concretions common, beds laterally discontinous, cross-bedding common
CAPE FEAR FORMATION -Sandstone and sandy mudstone. ye\!owish gray to bluish gray, mottled red to yellowish orange, indurated, graded and laterally continuous bedding, blocky clay, faint cross-bedding. feld-spar and mica common
t. Aldri
st
C n,
2, Bart\
B
a'
C
· 3. B!ac!
a: u
4. Buth.
ir; .,
5. Buci,
0-
ti
E
6. Deb
l
' ti
7. Drul ~-
C
8. Farr c
i
9. Ful!i
I
10. FulL
11. Fuli
12. Fu\'
13. Full
14. Fu!
15: Gk
' ,. ,•
/I ,.
!:
l.'
I
i,
I
i/ .,
·,
I SOIL SURVEY OF REF. 20
ashington County, North Carolina
I
I
I
United States Department of Agriculture
Soil Conservation Service
in cooperation with
North Carolina Agricultural Research Service
North Carolina Agricultural Extension Service
Washington County Board of Commissioners, and
North Carolina Department of Natural Resources
and Community Development
nsnszrmrw SFSTZTCTW mrvrcrrr:ar:r PT 7 i:W?
I
This soil is well suited to pasture forage such as
fescue and Ladino clover. I This soil is poorly suited to most urban and recreation
uses because of wetness.
The dominant native trees are sweetgum, red maple,
I yellow-poplar, baldcypress, willow oak, and water oak. The understory includes mainly sweetbay, southern bayberry, giant cane, pawpaw, fetterbush lyonia, inkberry, and greenbrier. Wetness is the main limitation to I woodland use and management.
This Fortescue soil is in capability subclass Vlw and
woodland group 2w. ·
I Hy-Hyde silt loam. This is a nearly level, very poorly drained soil in the Blacklands. The mapped areas are irregular in shape and range from 10 to 500 acres in
I size.
· Typically, the surface layer is 17 inches thick. It is very dark gray silt loam in the upper part and very dark grayish brown silt loam in the lower part. The subsoil is II 41 inches thick. The upper part is grayish brown silt II loam, the middle part is dark grayish brown and light brownish gray silty clay loam, and the lower part is light brownish gray silt loam. The underlying material to a II depth of 85 inches is greenish gray silt loam in the upper II part and stratified sand, loamy sand, and sandy loam in the lower part.
Included in mapping are small areas of Cape Fear, II Portsmouth, and Roper soils that are common in D adjacent areas. Most of the included soils are near the outer edge of the map unit. g The organic matter content in the surface layer of the Hyde soil is high. Permeability is moderately slow. The soil is extremely acid to strongly acid throughout, except where limed. The seasonal high water table is at or near n the surface. This soil is subject to rare flooding.
Most of the acreage of this soil is cultivated. The rest is mainly pasture and woodland.
0 If drained, this soil is well suited to most locally grown crops. Corn and soybeans are the dominant crops. Wetness is the main limitation. Minimum tillage, cover crops, and grasses and legumes in the cropping system
lihelp maintain tilth and crop production. Spring tillage and ufall harvest can be delayed because of wetness. Lack of suitable outlets and moderately slow permeability are limitations to the installation of drainage systems. B This soil is well suited to pasture forage such as escue and Ladino clover.
This soil is poorly suited to most urban and recreation uses. Wetness is the main limitation to those uses. l The dominant native trees are loblolly pine, red maple, sh, sweetgum, elm, water oak, and willow oak. The understory includes mainly American holly, sweetbay,
I ourwood, reeds, and southern wax myrtle. Wetness is he main limitation to woodland use and management. This Hyde soil is in capability subclass II lw and woodland group 1 w.
I
I
Soil survey
Me-Muckalee loam. This is a nearly level, poorly
drained soil on flood plains of small_ streams that flow into Albemarle Sound and the Roanoke River. The mapped areas are oblong and range from _5 to 30 acres
in size.
Typically, the surface layer is dark gray loam 20 inches thick. The underlying material to a depth of 64 inches is gray sandy loam in the upper part, dark gray sandy loam in the middle part, and gray, stratified sand and loamy
sand in the lower part.
Included in mapping are small areas of Dorovan mucky silt loam.
The organic matter content of the surface layer of the Muckalee soil is medium. Permeability is moderate. The soil ranges from strongly acid to slightly acid in the upper part and medium acid to neutral in the lower part .. The seasonal high water table is within 1 /2 foot to 1 1 /2 feet of the surface. This soil is frequently flooded for brief
periods.
Most of the acreage of this soil is woodland. This soil is poorly suited to crop production. Flooding and wetness are the main limitations to this use. Lack of suitable outlets is a limitation to the installation of drainage systems. The soil is well suited to pasture forage such as fescue and Ladino clover, if it is drained
and protected from flooding.
This soil is poorly suited to recreation uses. Flooding
and wetness limit those uses. Frequent flooding is a severe limitation to urban uses.
The dominant native trees are baldcypress, pond pine, red maple, green ash, hickory, sweetgum, swamp tupelo, elm, yellow-poplar, river birch, water oak, and willow oak. The understory includes mainly cedar, American holly, sweetbay, sourwood, reeds, and waxmyrtle. Wetness and flooding are the main limitations to woodland use and management.
This Muckalee soil is in capability subclass Vw and woodland group 2w.
Pe-Pettigrew rauck. This is a nearly level, very poorly drained soil in the Blacklands. The mapped areas
are irregular in shape and range from 1 0 to 500 acres in size.
Typically, the surface layer is black muck 15 inches
thick. The upper part of the underlying mineral soil is very dark grayish brown mucky clay loam 5 inches thick. The subsoil is 30 inches thick. It is very dark gray clay loam in the upper part and dark gray clay in the middle and lower parts. The underlying material to a depth of 7 4 inches is greenish gray and dark gree1:ish gray, stratified sandy clay loam, sandy loam, and coarse sanci. Included in mapping are small areas of Roper, Hyde,
Wasda, Cape Fear, and Belhaven soils that are common
in adjacent areas. Most of the included soils are near the outer edge of the map unit.
Permeability is moderately slow to moderately rapid in the organic layer of Pettigrew muck, and ii is slow lo very slow in the upper mineral layers. The shrink-swell
rsa
J:
i
1
'•
I
20
I
and stumps in the organic layers have to be removed
~
efore cultivation. Spring tillage and fall harvest may be
elayed because of wetness. During spring planting, soil
lowing can occur. Conservation practices such as
lf inimum tillage, the use of field borders, and the use of
indbreaks reduce the chance of soil blowing.
This soil is poorly suited to most urban and recreation
uses. Wetness, flooding, and low strength are limitations
io those uses.
The dominant native trees are red maple, sweetgum,
aldcypress, and blackgum. The understory includes
mainly inkberry, fetterbush lyonia, huckleberry,
(
eenbrier, waxmyrtle, and switchcane. Wetness and
coding are the main limitations to woodland use and
anagement.
This Scuppernong soil is in capability subclass Vllw
gind woodland group 4w.
TaB-Tarboro sand, 0 to 3 percent slopes. This is a
somewhat excessively drained soil in the northern part of
IJhe county. It is on low, broad ridges commonly adjacent
IJo Albemarle Sound and the Roanoke River. The
mapped areas are irregular in shape and range from 10
~
o 250 acres in size.
Typically, the surface layer is 12 inches thick. It is dark
rayish brown sand in the upper part and brown sand in
the lower part. The underlying material to a depth of 60
IE. ches is sand. It is brownish yellow in the upper part,
ellowish brown in the middle part, and yellow in the
wer part. Below that to a depth of 99 inches is pale
brown sand.
'
Included in mapping are Bojac and Conetoe soils,
hich are common in adjacent ~apped areas. Most of
he included soils are near the outer edge of the map
unit. Small areas of soils that are not as well drained as
•
his soil may occur in small depressions within the unit.
The surface layer of Tarboro sand is low in organic
matter content. Permeability is rapid, and available water
lapacity is low. This soil ranges from strongly acid to
lightly acid, except where limed.
Most of the acreage of this soil is cultivated. The rest
is mainly woodland.
This soil is suited to a few crops, such as peach l rchards, peanuts, and soybeans. It does not have
ufficient moisture for most crops during the growing
season. Leaching of plant nutrients, soil blowing, and low
-
vailable water capacity are the main limitations. Blowing
and can damage young plants. Minimum tillage, crop
esidue, the use of windbreaks, and close-growing
grasses and legumes in the cropping system help control ■oil blowing and conserve moisture. Split applications of
ltrtilizers, particularly nitrogen, are needed. This soil is
suited to pasture forage such a.s Coastal bermudagrass
-
nd bahiagrass.
This soil is well suited to most urban uses. The thick
andy material provides good support for most
.structures. The unprotected sandy surface, however, is
lubject to soil blowing and is draughty when rainfall is
I
Soil survey
limited. Seepage from septic tank filter field lines is
sometimes a problem. This soil is suited to recreation
uses; however, the sandy surface layer is sometimes a
limitation.
The dominant native trees are loblolly pine, longleaf
pine, sweetgum, southern red oak, blackjack oak, white
oak, post oak, and red maple. The understory includes
mainly dogwood, sassafras, and American holly. The low
available water capacity is the main limitation to
woodland use and management.
This Tarboro soil is in capability subclass Ills and
woodland group 4s.
To-Tomotley fine sandy loam. This is a nearly
level, poorly drained soil. It is on slightly elevated areas
in the Blacklands and in depressions near small streams
that flow into Albemarle Sound and the Roanoke River.
The mapped areas are irregular in shape and range from
10 to 150 acres in size.
Typically, the surface layer is dark gray fine sandy
loam 6 inches thick. The subsurface layer is light gray
fine sandy loam 5 inches thick. The subsoil is 53 inches
thick. It is light gray sandy loarri in the upper part, gray
and light olive gray clay loam in the middle part, and
gray sandy loam in the lower part. The underlying
material to a depth of 80 inches is gray stratified sandy
loam, loamy sand, and sand.
Included in mapping are small areas of Augusta,
Roanoke, and Portsmouth soils that are common in
adjacent mapped areas. Most of the included soils are
near the outer edge of the unit.
In the Tomotley soil, the organic matter content is
medium. Permeability is moderate to moderately slow.
The soil ranges from extremely acid to strongly acid in
the upper part, except where limed. Below a depth of
about 50 inches, it ranges from extremely acid to
medium acid. The seasonal high water table is at or near
the surface. This soil is subject to rare flooding.
Most of the acreage of this soil is cultivated. The rest
is mainly pasture or woodland.
The soil is well suited to most locally grown crops.
Corn and soybeans are the dominant crops. Wetness is
the main limitation to cultivation. Winter cover crops,
minimum tillage, and crop residue help maintain tilth and
production. Conservation practices such as no-till
planting, the use of field borders, and the use of crop
rotations that include close-growing crops also help
conserve soil and water.
The soil is well suited to pasture forage.
This soil is poorly suited to most urban and recreation
uses because of wetness.
The dominant native trees are loblolly pine, sweetgum,
red maple, yellow-poplar, willow oak, water oak, black
cherry, and American beech. The major understory
includes dogwood, sourwood, sweetbay, and sassafras,
along with a variety of briers and reeds. Wetness is the
main limitation to woodland use and management.
This Tomotley soil is in capability subclass lllw and
woodland group 2w. I
I
I
I
I
Ii! l
R
lli __ ·. ,;w I ;_ Washington County, North Carolina i·
I .Pl_,~ ;.,.. -~ .
tt~1-( subangular blocky structure; very friable; strongly II" 1; acid; abrupt smooth boundary. 11~\g :ucg-36 to 72 inches; grayish brown (2.SY 5/2) sand; r ll~~-· single grained; loose; slightly acid. 11, .. ,. ail?' The surface mineral layers range from 20 to 35 inches dL'12! in thickness. The underlying organic horizons range from I":1.ff 1 0 to 30 inches in thickness. The soil is extremely acid
!~ or strongly acid throughout the surface mineral layers DI~_ and the buried organic layers. The und~rlying ~ineral ,;,:'m horizons of some pedons range to medIu_m acid or •• ~·slightly acid.
D~~-The Ap or A1 horizon has hue of 10YR or SY, value of ,, .. •· 2 or 3, and chroma of 0 to 2.
·, -~-The IIOa horizon has hue of 2.SYR or SY, value of 2 ~!~ or 3, and chroma of 0 to 4. It is well decomposed
0-~ organic material. Fiber content is less than 1 percent ~-\~\ d t.\;~ rubbe . . . . rt.':'lfo The IICg horizons are grayish or greenish sand, loamy /1\~j~ sand, or sandy loam. IJffi,-11~ Hyde series ~'To•ttl-: r.: ,~ · The Hyde series consists of very poorly drained soils I :~f_ ;.,that formed in unconsolidated loamy fluvial and marine 'i/f.." deposits. Slope ranges from 0 to 2 percent. Wi~,ir,, Typical pedon of Hyde silt loam, approximately 0.6 f;.i:¼. · mile east of Wenona lookout tower, 0.1 mile east of 1~_1.~_ intersection of State Road 1128 and State Road 1129, ,;il 200 feet north of State Road 1129 in the third "cut" east [4fa:~! "A Canal":
lt,f'Ap-0 to 12 inches; very dark gray (10YR 3/1) silt loam; (~'.t;} moderate medium granular structure; very friable; f ~.::C: · common fine roots and crop residue; few fine clean
l[~\t~ sand grains; very strongly acid; clear smooth ,~,;;,. boundary. lli[;~tiJ. 12-12 to 17 inches; very dark grayish brown (1 OYA f:';,.)'.;Ji1,. 3/2) silt loam; moderate fine subangular blocky and IL. >iii;,(-granular structure; very friable; common fine roots ~~.,.. .. and old root channels; few fine pores; few fine [~,; °fi,j;--. flakes of mica; extremely acid; clear irregular .. ,.'£1'.'R' boundary. I'~· .B1-17 to 21 inches; grayish brown (10YR 5/2) silt , .,i4i;:;_ loam; moderate fine subangular blocky structure; · ,,;~1,:-, firm; slightly sticky, slightly plastic; common fine and
lflf-[; medium roots and pores; common very fine flakes of ,;:; , mica; extremely acid; clear wavy boundary. ltG· B21tg-21 to 37 inches; dark grayish brown (1 OYA 4/2)
l'½"f£ silty clay loam; few medium distinct strong brown
l~f;° (7 .SYR 5/6) mottles on faces of peds and along root f:,;/,\ channels; moderate angular and subangular blocky II.\~:;,~;,_-'--structure; very firm; sticky, plastic; common fine and l.'t~.ifJ'." · medium roots and pores; common very fine flakes of l ~i-mica; extremely acid; gradual wavy boundary. ,w,:'.:~~22tg-37 to 45 inches; light brownish gray (2.SY 6/2) ,, -~· silty clay loam; common medium distinct strong .. ::'~:" brown (7.SYR 5/6) mottles on faces of peds and ,; ~f-F . i,}fl
·•~,Jf,~ -~!"·,, i, ..... ·. ~t;;
51
along root channels; moderate fine angular and subangular blocky structure; very firm; slightly sticky, slightly plastic; common fine roots and pores;
common very fine flakes of mica; extremely acid; gradual wavy boundary.
B3g-45 to 58 inches; light brownish gray (2.SY 6/2) silt loam; common fine distinct brownish yellow mottles on faces of peds and along root channels; moderate fine subangular blocky structure; friable; slightly
sticky, slightly plastic; common very fine flakes of
mica; extremely acid; abrupt smooth boundary.
C1g-58 to 67 inches; greenish gray (SG 5/1) silt loam,
with pockets of very fine sand; massive; friable;
common very fine flakes of mica; extremely acid; gradual wavy boundary.
IIC2g-67 to 85 inches; greenish gray (SG 5/1) stratified
sand, loamy sand, and sandy loam; massive; very
friable; common very fine flakes of mica; extremely
acid.
Hyde soils have a loamy Bt horizon 20 to 40 inches
thick. The soil ranges from extremely acid to strongly
acid, except in limed areas. Few to common flakes of
mica occur throughout the profile.
The Al horizon has hue of 1 OYA or 2.SY, value of 2 or 3, and chroma of 0 to 2.
The B1 horizon has hue of 1DYR or 2.SY, value of 4 to 6, and chroma of 1 or 2. It is silt loam or loam. The B2tg horizon has hue of 1 OYA or SY, value of 4 to 6, and
chroma of 1 or 2. Mottles in shades of brown or red are common in the B2tg horizon. Texture is silty clay loam or clay loam.
The B3 horizon is similar in color to the B2tg horizon. It ranges from silt loam to silty clay or sandy loam.
The C horizon is greenish gray, grayish brown, or light
gray or mottled gray, brown, and reddish brown. It is
stratified sand, sandy loam, or loamy sand.
Muckalee series
The Muckalee series consists of poorly drained soils that formed in loamy fluvial sediments. Slope is less than 2 percent.
Typical pedon of Muckalee loam, approximately 2 miles southeast of Plymouth; 150 feet west of State Road
1181 on State Road 1115 and 1 00 feet northeast of bridge on State Road 1115:
A11-0 to 9 inches; dark gray (10YR 4/1) loam; weak medium granular structure; very friable; slightly
sticky, slightly plastic; common fine roots; strongly
acid; clear wavy boundary.
A12-9 to 20 inches; dark gray (1DYR 4/1) loam; few fine distinct yellowish brown mottles around root channels; massive; friable; sticky, plastic; common
fine roots; strongly acid; gradual wavy boundary.
C1g-20 to 32 inches; gray (SY 5/1) sandy loam;
common medium distinct dark greenish gray (SGY
52 a
D 4/1) mottles; massive; friable; slightly sticky, slightly
plastic; few fine flakes of mica; slightly acid; gradual
wavy boundary.
C2g-32 to 42 inches; dark gray (SY 4/1) sandy loam;
D massive; friable; few fine flakes of mica; slightly
acid; gradual wavy boundary.
C3g-42 to 64 inches; gray (10YR 5/1) stratified sand
and loamy sand; massive; very friable; common n partially decomposed roots and fibers; few fine
flakes of mica; slightly acid.
The A horizon ranges from strongly acid to slightly
0 acid. The C horizon ranges from medium acid to neutral.
There are few to common flakes of mica throughout the
profile. ·
The A1 horizon has hue of 10YR or 2.5Y, value of 3 to
D 5, and chroma of 1 or 2.
. The C horizon has hue of 1 0YR or SY, value of 4 to 6,
and chroma of 1 or 2. It is sandy loam or loamy sand. II Some pedons have strata of sandy clay loam, sand, or II loamy sand.
The Muckalee series has siliceous mineralogy.
Because the Muckalee soils in this survey area have
I mixed mineralogy, they are considered a taxadjunct to
the series. They are similar in use, management, and
behavior, however, to the Muckalee series. I Pettigrew series
The Pettigrew series consists of very poorly drained
soils that formed in clayey marine deposits under
I extremely wet conditions.
Typical pedon of Pettigrew muck, approximately 1.5
miles northwest of Lake Phelps and 0.5 mile southeast
I of First Colony Farms grain elevators, 0.4 mile south of
main east-west canal and 100 feet east of main north-
south canal in 10th cut:
I Oap-0 to 7 inches; black (N2/0, broken face and
rubbed) muck; moderate medium granular structure;
very friable; common fine roots and crop residue;
few small pieces of charcoal; strongly acid; clear
I smooth boundary.
Oa2-7 to 15 inches; black (SYR 2/1, broken face and
rubbed) muck; moderate medium subangular blocky
I
structure; friable; slightly sticky and pastelike;
common fine and medium roots; few pieces of
charcoal and few pockets of ash; few vertical cracks
up to 1 / 4 inch wide; extremely acid; gradual smooth
boundary. I A 1-15 to 20 inches; very dark grayish brown (1 0YR
3/2) mucky clay loam; weak fine subangular blocky
structure; very friable; slightly sticky, slightly plastic;
I common fine to medium roots and fibers; extremely
acid; gradual smooth boundary.
B1g-20 to 26 inches; very dark gray (10YR 3/1) clay
loam; weak medium subangular blocky structure;
I friable; sticky, plastic; common fine to medium roots
I
and fibers; extremely acid; gradual smooth
boundary.
B2g-26 to 36 inches; dark gray (10YR 4/1) clay; weak
fine subangular blocky structure; very firm; very
sticky, very plastic; common fine to medium roots
and fibers; strongly acid; gradual smooth boundary.
B3g-36 to 50 inches; dark gray (N4/0) clay; massive; ·,y,
very firm; very sticky, very plastic; common fine to -..,.,.
medium roots and fibers; strongly acid; clear smooth _w .'
boundary. Jj", ,:
IICg-50 to 74 inches; greenish gray (5G 5/1) and dark '..\: \
greenish gray (5G 4/1) stratified sandy clay loam, :~J,:;
sandy loam, and coarse sand; massive; friable or • .i ··
loose; sandy clay loam and clay loam is slightly ",al),
sticky, slightly plastic; common fine flakes of mica; -~--~'
slightly acid. ·illi:i~'\ 1.Y;,
Thickness of the muck and clayey materials over •~',
unconforming sediments ranges from 40 to more than 60 ./~~•·
inches. Reaction ranges from strongly acid to extremely "f,i-#
acid In the upper part of the control section and medium ·-ff'ti
acid to mildly alkaline in the lower part and in the C · ¼~.ii
horizon. Few to common fine flakes of mica are in the ·:1:.,·•1
lower part of the B and in the C horizons. J '
The Oap or Oa1 horizon has hue of 5YR or 2.5Y, ·~;:
value of 2 or 3, and chroma of 0 or 2. In drained areas, it ~~
has weak to moderate medium granular structure. The .J}j
Oa2 horizon has hue of 2.5YR to 2.5Y, value of 2 or 3, ':i-jji/
and chroma of 0 to 4. In drained areas, it has weak to :jf
moderate medium subangular blocky structure. The ~~t
unrubbed fib_er content ranges from 2 to 20 percent, and i.ii
the rubbed fiber content ranges from 0 to 4 percent. :~,
Charcoal fragments and pockets of ash are few to ·~fi
common in the organic horizons of some pedons. '.~'&'.
The A 1 horizon has hue of 1 0YR or SY, value of 3 or ··· .. ~·
4, and chroma of 0 to 2. It is loam, clay loam, mucky
clay loam, silty clay loam, or sandy clay loam that is 8 to ;;.t
20 percent organic matter. Some pedons do not have an 11()
A 1 horizon. · .i.:tfi
The B horizon has hue of 1 0YR or SY, value of 3 to 6, '~ ,_
and chroma of o to 2. It is clay loam, clay, or silty clay. .-.:[ef_,_X~
Few to common mottles of higher chroma are iri some ::i
pedons. ~
The C horizon is grayish or greenish, stratified sandy _;!
and loamy sediments. .;.;;.: j Ponzer series
The Ponzer series consists of very poorly drained
organic soils. The organic layers are 16 to 51 inches
thick over loamy textured marine and fluvial sediments.
Slope ranges from 0 to 2 percent.
Typical pedon of Ponzer muck, approximately 0. 7 mile
northwest of intersection of State Road 1126 and State
Road 1183, 2. 7 miles northeast of State Road 1126 on
dirt road; 50 feet southwest of dirt road: ·
;~-r: _;-1.V:(I ·t -~fli1 "<;~ ~,~,~ j,
'1~·-. ·i:; "J
-~_fl __ ·' Oa1-0 to 13 inches; black (10YR 2/1, broken face and Ill:~~
rubbed) muck; less than 5 percent fibers, less than t;:_
,71.!
;·
#g
a 56
d
Scuppernong series
I The Scuppernong series consists of very poorly
drained organic soils. The organic layers are 16 to 51
inches thick over loamy sediments that are high in silt
n and organic matter and overlie sand. Slope ranges from
0 to 1 percent.
· Typical pedon of Scuppernong muck, approximately
1.5 miles south of State Road 1126 on State Road 1183,
U 500 feet east of State Road 1183:
Oap-0 to 5 inches; black (5YR 2/ 1, broken face and
rubbed) muck; less than 1 percent fiber unrubbed
D and rubbed; moderate fine and medium granular
structure; very friable; common fine and large roots
and fragments of wood; strongly acid; abrupt smooth
boundary.
DOa2-5 to 9 inches; dark reddish brown (5YR 2/2,
· broken face and rubbed) muck; less than 1 percent
fiber unrubbed and rubbed; massive parting to weak
fine angular blocky structure; friable; slightly sticky II and pastelike; common fine, medium, and large II roots and fragments of wood; few fine pieces of
charcoal; extremely acid; clear smooth boundary.
Oa3-9 to 20 inches; dark reddish brown (5YR 3/2, II broken face and rubbed) muck; about 5 percent II fibers, less than 1 percent rubbed; massive;' friable;
slightly sticky and pastelike; common medium and
I large roots and fragments of wood; few medium
pieces of charcoal; extremely acid; gradual wavy
boundary.
Oa4-20 to 28 inches; dark reddish brown (5YR 3/3, II broken face and rubbed) muck; about 15 percent II · fibers, 2 percent rubbed; massive; friable; slightly
sticky and pastelike; common medium and large
roots and fragments of wood; few medium pieces of
I charcoal; extremely acid; clear wavy boundary.
IIC1g-28 to 45 inches; dark greenish gray (5GY 4/1)
mucky silt loam; massive; slightly sticky; common
fine streaks and pockets of light gray very fine sand I and silt; extremely acid; clear smooth boundary.
IIIC2g-45 to 48 inches; light gray (10YR 7/1) sand;
single grained; loose; few medium flakes of mica;
extremely acid; gradual wavy boundary. I IIIC3g-48 to 72 inches; dark greenish gray (5GY 4/1)
sand; single grained; loose; few medium flakes of
mica; extremely acid.
I Thickness of the organic material ranges from 16 to
51 inches. The organic horizons are extremely acid (in
0.01 molar of calcium chloride) except where the surface
I layer has been limed. The mineral horizons range from
extremely acid to neutral. Logs, stumps, and fragments
of wood occupy 0 to 15 percent of the upper organic
horizons in cultivated or pastured areas and 10 to 35
I percent in undrained_ areas. A few (0 to 2 percent)
pieces of charcoal and pockets of ash occur in the
organic layers. Flakes of mica are few to common in the
1 mineral horizons of most pedons.
I
The Oa1 or Oap horizon has hue of 5YR or 10YR,
value of 2 or 3, and chroma of 0 to 3. In cultivated or ,
pastured areas, it has weak to moderate fine and ,Yi'f;._ ..
medium granular structure. Structure in the Oa2 horizon •I, -'"
occurs only in drained areas that are cultivated. The :1"' ''
structure is massive but parts to fine and medium
angular blocky. -
The Oa2 horizon and underlying organic tiers have tiu·
of 2.5YR or 5YR, value of 2 or 3, and chroma of 2 or 4. -l
The lower tiers of organic matter are pastelike, have a _ ,
greasy feel, and are massive under natural, wet _., 'i\i ~
conditions. If the soil is drained and cultivated, its ·:'.,,_" .!_,.
1 structure changes upon aeration. Excessive drying ~ ~· ,,
causes shrinkage and the formation of hard angular ;~ ,
blocky peds. These peds dry irreversibly. Fiber content is ~11~ 1
highest in the lower tier. It ranges from 10 to 50 percent.~~ ,
unrubbed and less than 10 percent rubbed. ;,})!ii ·
The IIC1g horizon has hue of 5GY, 5G, or SY, value of ~t'IJ~_/'
3 to 5, and chroma of 1 or 2. It is silt loam or silty clay .. ~~~: j
loam and contains 1 0 to 20 percent organic matter J¥1i .
throughout. '1U\.
The IIICg horizons have hue of 10YR or 5Y, value of 6.~'
or 8, and chroma of 1 or 2 and range to greenish gray' or' :1;1
dark greenish gray. They are sand or loamy sand. --111 '
Tarboro series ·;~ . ~,,1,'>i The Tarboro series consists of somewhat excessively -~~ ,,,;
drained soils that formed in sandy fluvial sediments. _ ·ii·"·'
Slope ranges from 0 to 3 percent. ~f' .,
Typical pedon of Tarboro sand, Oto 3 percent slopes, .1. ~\
approximately 0.5 mile east of intersection of State Road \ ,:.
1315 and N.C. Highway 32, and 250 feet south of 1, :,
Albemarle Sound in the woods: ·:~~
A 11-0 to 3 inches; dark grayish brown (1 0YR 4/2)
sand; weak fine granular structure; very friable;
many fine and medium roots; many clean sand
grains; strongly acid; clear smooth boundary.
A 12-3 to 12 inches; brown (1 0YR 4/3) sand; weak fine
granular structure; very friable; common fine to
coarse roots; few organic stains on sand grains; few
very fine opaque grains; strongly acid; clear wavy
boundary.
C1-12 to 31 inches; brownish yellow (10YR 6/6) sand;
single grained; loose; few fine to coarse roots; few
fine flakes of mica; few very fine opaque grains;
strongly acid; gradual wavy boundary.
C2-31 to 52 inches; yellowish brown (1 0YR 5/6) sand;
single grained; loose; few medium and large roots;
few fine flakes of mica; _few very fine opaque grains;
strongly acid; clear wavy boundary.
C3-52 to 60 inches; yellow (1 0YR 7 /8) sand; single
grained; loose; few fine flakes of mica; few very fine
opaque grains; medium acid; clear smooth
boundary.
C4-60 to 99 inches; pale brown (1 0YR 6/3) sand;
single grained; loose; few fine flakes of mica; few
very fine opaque grains; strongly acid.
!~1 ,,~
.~
;iii;~' :;t,,, 'ir.1 -~.,,,..,· ~
.,ii/mt '· '" "· 3, ~ ·v ,
1~ ~~ 11 /~ ~ 'i. -,.
·,'/Ii·•, :~:
□
D
0
0
D
0
D
u
I
I
I
I
I
U S DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
. ~OIL CONSERVATION SERVICE
Georgia-Pacific Corp. Hardwood Sawmill
NCO 000 813 592
. ,-]W~ !-... ·, .. , /
780000 r ..
FEET >,,
-~~
e ~ ~ ~ {i ~ • ,: : =··--. ~ : . ,·
.. ~\~~-,\
• ~L • ~G~~
REF. 21
NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT
WILLIAM P. SAUNDERS, Director
Division of Mineral Resources
JASPER L. STUCKEY, State Geologist
Bulletin Number 73
GEOLOGY AND GROUND-WATER RESOURCES
IN THE
GREENVILLE AREA, NORTH CAROLINA
By
PHILIP M. BROWN
Geologist, Geological Survey
United States Department of the Interior
PREPARED COOPERATIVELY BY THE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
1959
I• '.~.~!l:.!t{ir: ir-m~, .... ,. ~;~he?:·. t~(~1~~ · ·~ · , . Jil§F/f~'Lf-Z" . Martin County f/~,\~•:r,,-, (Area 481 square miles, population 27,938) n:.,,f,r,I~~,;·,· Martin County, elongated in an east-west direc-ij ' 'thin, lies approximately in the geographical center of P., , ;f the Greenville area. The county is bounded by Pitt, :;;; ;~:'. Bertie, Washington, Beaufort, Edgecombe, and Hali-rY~~if.j fax Counties._ Williamston,. the county seat and ~-"~" largest town m the county, 1s located on the banks l ;;it~!: of the Roanoke River, which forms the northern ,.'fi:.'i!tfftiounclary of the county. Other population c.enters in-~l;,4';;~".t,' elude Bear Grass, Hamilton, Jamesville, Oak City, I " .,,.-:-and Robersonville. . J,F, ... The entire county is drained by the Roanoke River \;;~.~:' -and several of its small tributaries. A high escarp-w.'· ~-.:,. I,~.·::-''· ment broken by numerous low swampy ~reas extends _,.,;::-· along the Roanoke River for most of its length. f~r'· The county is largely agricultural, tobacco being I .,;,,., -. the chief crop. A large pulp mill and a chemical ~-:r· manufacturing plant are the major industries in the tifmJK·~ county.
ii;;f.{;;.. Geology.-Surficial clay, sand, and gravel of Quat-li!ilf,0·, . ernary age occur as a thin layer over the entire coun-~11:: ty. Along the Roanoke River and its tributaries this f6il~--material is as much as 40 feet thick; in the inter-e:r·: stream areas it is rarely more than 15 feet thick. if;/.;.: . The surficial deposits are underlain by the York-1,f-town formation of late Miocene ~ge, which consi~ts .~"'·· of blue clay, marl, and sand. The 1. orktown format10n t.l'!~ff;c',. is exposed intermittently along the Roanoke River, l ~irii,:-where the stream has cut down through overlying ~~: material, and is exposed in many shallow marl pits :/-1:<l'f'.'i' in the interstream areas. The formation is common-l~""'i,::.~_ly le~s than 80 to 100 feet thick throughout the ,;t;i,'ii~_,county. Jl¾lf'.'· The Castle Hayne limestone of Eocene age under-llf.~_c lies the Yorktown formation in the eastern part of I*~;,_ . Martin County. Wells east of Jamesville and Smith-ti:i:'c/.' wick obtain water from the Castle Hayne limestone F-§~-;:'"" for~ation which in this part of the Greenville area 11f(~, consists of a very hard shell-limestone .. Wells at , .'./' Williamston and Bear Grass do not encounter the ~,~;;;.':;formation, indicating that the formation pinches out
'
~.•:;~_;' al~ng a line west of Jan_ies~ille and Smit~wick. Total 1'1!,'-· thickness of the format10n m the county 1s unknown. t.~ p..;;~~.-Glauconitic sands and shell beds of the Beaufort l~.'..: .. i_c-.. c: formation of Paleocene age underlie the eastern and i'f·: central thirds of the county. The formation, confin-l?t'-ed to the subsurface, has not been recognized west I~ of Williamston and Bear Grass. Total thickness of :f,i_: _ this unit in a well at Williamston was 27 feet, where 'f!p.! the top of the unit was 59 feet below sea level. Its
l•~:i, 70
~fr-. ~-.... t:f.··· l~t::,:,
~l?f· ~i~
ii:'Eiii Slnli1i-
total thickness and its depth below sea level would be expected to increase in an easterly direction. The Upper Cretaceous Pedee and Black Creek for-mations, composed of dark-colored lenticular sands and clays, underlie. the central and eastern sections of Martin County. The western extent of these for-mations has not been determined. It is probable that marine sediments of these two formations interfinger with deltaic sediments of comparable age in the west-ern part of the county. The Peedee formation at Williamston is 129 feet thick and the top of the for-mation is 86 feet below sea level. The Black Creek formation is 259 feet thick at Williamston . The basal Upper Cretaceous unit, the Tuscaloosa formation, underlies the Peedee and Black Creek for-mations in the eastern and central parts of Martin County. In western Martin County this formation lies unconformably beneath Paleocene and Miocene sediments. The Tuscaloosa formation, composed of light-colored lenticular clays and arkosic sands, lies within 40 to 50 feet of the land surface in the west-ern part of the county and is buried progressively deeper in an easterly direction. Estimated thickness of the formation in the eastern part of the county is about 400 feet.
Sediments of Early Cretaceous age probably un-derlie the Tuscaloosa formation in the eastern and central parts of Martin County, whereas in the western part of the county the formation is underlain by crystalline rocks.
Ground water.-All public and private water sup-plies in Martin County are obtained from wells. Mar-tin County is favorably situated as to ground-water supply. Several millions of gallons per day of ground water may be obtained at any one place in the coun-ty. Larg-diameter gravel-wall wells will yield as much as 1,000 gpm in most localities.
Surficial sands and gravels of Quaternary age and near-surface sand and shell beds of the Yorktown formation yield 2 to 10 gpm. Rural supplies in the county are obtained largely from dug or driven wells that tap the aquifers of Miocene or Quaternary age. Small-diameter jetted wells in eastern and central Martin County draw water from sand lenses and shell beds of Miocene age, limestone of Eocene age, and greensand of Paleocene age at depths ranging from GO to 200 feet. These wells, either open-end or single-screen, yield as much as 50 gpm. Jetted wells in western Martin County obtain water from sand lenses and shell beds of Miocene age and from sands of Cretaceous age. These wells, generally less than 400 feet deep, yield from 10 to 300 gpm.
REF. 22
SIMULATION OF GROUND-WATER FLOW IN THE
COASTAL PLAIN AQUIFER SYSTEM
OF NORTH CAROLINA
U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY
Open-File Report 90-372
SIMUIATION OF GROUND-WATER FLOW IN THE COASTAL PIAIN
AQUIFER SYSTEM OF NORTH CAROLINA
By G.L. Giese, J.L. Eimers, and R.W. Coble
U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY
Open-File Report 90-372
f
Raleigh, North Carolina
1991
nm riz-zrnrtttam58Di f
aquifers they overlie. Thus, aquifer Al is the lowermost aquifer and the confining unit overlying it is CUl. These designations are referred to frequently in this report.
Selected hydrogeologic sections were adopted from Winner and Coble (1989) to show the distribution of aquifers and confining units throughout the North Carolina Coastal Plain (figs. 5 through 9). The idealized sections show the thickening, thinning, and pinch-outs typical of these hydrogeologic units in the study area. Confining units are considered to terminate at the limit of the underlying aquifer. These relations are built into the modeling process, and the reader is referred to Winner and Coble (1989) for detailed geologic and hydrologic descriptions. Brief descriptions of each hydrogeologic unit are presented in this section.
Surficial Aquifer (AlO)
The surficial aquifer (AlO) overlies all of the North Carolina Coastal Plain (fig. 1) and consists. of fine sand, silt, clay, shell, and peat beds. Scattered deposits of coarser-grained sediments in the unit occur in relict beach ridges or in alluvium. Throughout the western and central parts of the Coastal Plain, the thickness of the surficial aquifer ranges from a few feet to about 30 ft (feet); however, the aquifer thickens eastward and is more than 200 ft thick in the vicinity of the Outer Banks. The sediments of the surficial aquifer are primarily of post-Yorktown age, but are not / restricted to a single geologic unit in terms of age or lithology (Winner and Coble, 1989).
The surficial aquifer (AlO) directly overlies most of the confined aquifers at one place or another_ and exchanges Water with them either directly or through an intervening confining bed. The surficial aquifer receives direct recharge from precipitation and is the source of water for the deeper confined aquifers and base flow to streams. The amount of recharge from precipitation varies areally
depending on the clay content of the soils.
from about 12 to 20 in/yr,
Winner and Coble (1989) estimated the average horizontal hydraulic conductivity of the surficial aquifer to be 29 ft/d (feet per day). A more detailed description of movement of water Within the surficial aquifer is given in the section entitled "Model Input.11
14
~
r~·,i1, . • •'\!J:' .. ~-1'•,• I ·;; ... ,..·.n·· ·•if1
(•·'':-
i'f.'.l''.~-~-
'. '·•
.f;;, •~--:,~.''.·.
I":_ -~'""-
1·"'
;..;.._
1·
I
a -~ ..
I··,::·
,.
'l;...i;; . -
I,, ...
ir~
l
'.!'1)(
!:°!.' . . '
I~-·~;··
;l,.._
IW•:.~_-
•--· ·1-·
'
=•::/ -, ...
t·.-:·-.
:---·
I"',::·.
...
I-
I-.•· ,.
·,
.1-J .. ; ,.
,
•'•· .,
;:,:_·
Yorktown Aquifer (A9) and Overlying Confining Unit (CU9)
The Yorktown aquifer (A9), is equated with the older beds of the Pliocene Yorktown Formation of Clark and others (1912) and extends throughout the northern half of the Coastal Plain (fig. 10) from the Fall Line, where it overlies crystalline rocks similar to those in the Piedmont, eastward to beyond the coast. The Yorktown aquifer is largely composed of fine sand, silty and clayey sand, and sand with shells and shell beds, with some limestone and coarse sand beds also present. In the western Coastal Plain, the aquifer is relatively thin, less than 20 ft thick in many places, and has been cut into or eroded away by the larger streams flowing across the area. In Dare County, the Yorktown aquifer attains its maximum thickness of over 300 ft.
The Yorktown aquifer (A9) does not extend into the southern half of the Coastal Plain, except for a small area in Robeson County (fig. 10) which is the largest of a number of outliers shown by Brown and others (1972, pl. 21). Figure 10 also shows the areal extent of aquifers that underlie the Yorktown aquifer. The surficial aquifer (Al0) overlies the Yorktown aquifer everywhere.
The estimated horizontal hydraulic conductivity of the Yorktown aquifer (A9) ranges from 19 to 33 ft/d and averages about 21 ft/d, based on aquifer tests and lithologic-and geophysical-log data from 52 wells and test holes ,..
(Winner and Coble, 1989).
The Yorktown confining unit (CU9) overlying the Yorktown aquifer is comprised of the youngest clay beds of the Yorktown Formation in most places, but locally may include clay beds of Pleistocene or Holocene age. Its thickness averages about 25 ft, ranging from less than 10 up to 50 ft thick. It is composed largely of clay and sandy clay that locally includes beds of fine sand or shell. The Yorktown confining unit generally is considered to extend only as far as the Yorktown.aquifer, even though stratigraphically equivalent beds may continue beyond the aquifer limits .
20
Pungo River Aquifer {AP) and Overlying Confining Unit {CUB)
The Pungo River aquifer (A8) consists of the permeable part of the
Pungo River. Formation of lower and middle Miocene age, described in detail
by Kimrey (1965). The Pungo River aquifer is composed of fine to medium
marine sands with considerable phosphate content. Average estimated
horizontal hydraulic conductivity based on analysis of geophysical logs is
33 ft/d, according to Winner and Coble (1989). Shells and other fossils are
present throughout the aquifer; occasionally, beds of limestone and coarse
sand are found.
The Pungo River aquifer (AB) is thinnest near its western and northern
limits, where its thickness averages about 15 ft. The aquifer dips eastward
and thickens to more than 200 ft in the vicinity of the Outer Banks where
the top is more than 700 ft below sea level. The aquifer is overlain
everywhere by aquifers A9 or AlO (fig. 11), except where it is exposed in an
open-pit phosphate mine in Beaufort County. The Pungo River aquifer is
underlain everywhere by the Castle Hayne aquifer (A7).
The Pungo River confining unit (CUB) is formed by the upper clay beds
of the Pungo River Formation and contiguous clays of the lowermost Yorktown
Formation. The confining unit ranges in thickness from less than 10 ft near
the western margin to about 150 ft beneath Currituck County, with an ave,age
,thickness of nearly 55 ft. For most of the area, the confining unit is f composed of nearly uniform clay containing less than 10 percent sand.
Castle Hayne Aquifer {A7) and Overlying Confining Unit (CU7)
The Castle Hayne aquifer (A7) is delineated as those calcareous
sediments of Eocene age that are equated with the Castle Hayne Limestone and
the Trent Formation of former usage of Clark and others (1912). Also
included in this aquifer are rocks of Oligocene age, now designated River
Bend Formation, overlying the Castle Hayne (Brown and others, 1972), which
are lithologically identical and hydraulically connected to the Castle Hayne
Limestone. The basal part of the aquifer may include older contiguous
permeable units in local areas. The areal extent of this aquifer is shown
in figure 12, which also shows the extent of overlying aquifers.
22
36"
79• 78"
. IT JrntflcPJ51157PfflifMt:M FffiiP§'f2frmr:rree:m&xw:rrrtt1t1t-ce"-@
Georgia-Pacific Corp. Hardwood Sawmill
NCD 000 813 592
77• 76"
j
ELL I , DARE
('--. ·7
\
\
\
I ·;
;;c_ ""' r~,.,.. ) .. / ·r·"' ✓' ~/RJCH..;,,,~:.,,·/ HOKE icuMSERW<o\ .Jso~ '\ · · "' /7 35• . . ( ..... _ \..'" ·, , -~-/
----<;'.__'v' ___ / 1\--~\\ (., <v,~
!
34•
33•
~~ j_ ./'' i:;.,,. --·-....__ +·
C'l-,~O , COI..UMBUS / I_.;;.$ ?,.,:""'· . ...,..--· Ii , f BRUNSWlCI< "' . --•---"--,;cl
SO MltES e-------~
SOKILOl.4ETERS
EXPLANATION
!lill-'...,! CASI'LE HAYNE AQUIFER NOT PRFSENT
212.._ LIMIT AND DESIGNATION OF AQUIFER DIRECTLY OVERLYING CASTLE HAYNE AQUIFER AND ITS CONFINING UNIT
AIO Surficial aquifer
A9 Yorktown aquifer
A8 Pungo River aquifer
Figure 12.--Areal extent of the Castle Hayne aquifer (A7) and overlying aquifers (modified from Winner and Coble, 1989).
24
' i
I
r
I
i i
I
= m:rtttt ·w ftitNWW77tICW17$$! 5 pr
Limes·tone may occur as shell limestone, dolomitic limestone, and sandy .limestone ranging from loosely consolidated to hard and recrystallized. Along the western margin, the aquifer occurs near land surface from New Hanover County to Craven
County. Eastward, the aquifer thickens to more than 950 ft in Carteret County and to nearly 1,200 ft beneath Cape Hatteras (Brown, 1958, fig. 4). In the area north of Albemarle Sound, limestone beds are thin to
nonexistent 1 and the sediments contain more clay. The thickness of the unit averages about
maximum of 115
50 ft between Bertie and Currituck Counties but reaches a
ft in Currituck County.
The Castle Hayne aquifer (A7) is the most productiv~ aquifer in North Carolina due to its thickness and high percentage of permeable limestone and sand. On the basis of aquifer tests and lithologic and geophysical log data, the hydraulic conductivity of the Castle Hayne aquifer ranges from about 15 ft/d, where it is composed of fine sand, to about 200 ft/d where the bulk of the aquifer is porous limestone.
The thickness of the Castle Hayne confining unit (CU7) averages only about 10 ft; it exceeds 25 ft only i.n Gates County along the Virginia border, in eastern Pamlico and Carteret Counties, and in two small areas along the western limit of the Castle Hayne aquifer (A7). The confining
unit is composed of beds of clay, sandy clay, and clay with sandy streaks that· are part of the Pungo River Formation, the Yorktown Formation, or younger clays. The confining unit is missing in several stream valleys south of Craven County and in two areas in the northeastern Coastal Plain. In addition to being thinner than most of the other confining units, the Castle Hayne confining unit contains more sand; thus, it is relatively, permeable and allows significant vertical leakage between the Castle Hayne and overlying aquifer_s.
The Castle Hayne aquifer (A7) and confining unit (CU7) are directly overlain by the Pungo River aquifer (A8) throughout most of its northern and eastern area (fig. 12), whereas to the south, the Castle Hayne is overlain by the Yorktown and surficial aquifers (A9 and AlO). The Castle Hayne is directly underlain by the Beaufort aquifer (A6) and confining unit (CU6) northeast of Jones and Onslow Counties and by the Peedee aquifer (AS) and confining unit (CUS) south of these counties (fig. 13).
25
I I I'
i' I
I' i
l
\
I I
1:/.
Is*.;: __
-· ?' . ,·,:
I
1: ..... ,~
i::'.~-
1\1.~:.: ... ..
I,· .. -. -···
.;:; ~
·ltl!'z-.'..
; : ,. ~·
Ill';'~-..
. '
~7;--·"·•
l
"':i;':'.:• -··'.
~-.,,.,
i,-~_-~.-u-
·--· ti··· 11:
t-·
11
'
As previously mentioned, the model assumes all flow in aquifers to be
horizontal and all flow in confining units to be vertical. It was
recognized 1 however, that in many places within zones designated as aquifer material, the thickness of clay is significant, and this clay often
functions as an impediment to vertical flow. A more realistic simulation of the flow system was obtained by incorporating the effects of clay within aquifers into the leakance terms. Accordingly, total effective thickness
(b) values for each confining unit were generated (figs. 35-43) which
represented the sum of (1). effective confining unit thickness, (2) one-half the thickness of clay beds in the aquifer above the confining unit, and (3) one-half the thickness of clay beds in the aquifer below the confining unit. At some locations shown in figures 35-43 where the confining unit is
designated as not present (particularly in stream valleys), the clay within aquifers concept was used to assign an effective clay thickness for modeling purposes .
Initial values for K , representing the vertical hydraulic conductivity V of confining unit material, were based on appraisals of confining unit
effectiveness derived from geophysical logs, differences in head between aquifers above and below the confining unit, and chemical analyses, using as a guideline values of vertical hydraulic conductivity for various materials given by
from 1 x
Morris and Johnson
.3 10 ft/day to 4 x
(1967, table
-6 10 ft/day.
6). These initial values ranged
At many locations, two or more confining units need to be considered
for modeling purposes as occurring between two non-sequential aquifers (case A in fig. 44). For example, the lower Cape Fear aquifer (A2) may be present and directly above it the lower and upper Cape Fear confining unit (CU2), and the Black Creek aquifer (A4) may be present. The upper Cape Fear
aquifer (A3) and upper Cape Fear confining unit (CU3) are missing in this example. In this situation the lower Cape Fear confining unit (CU2) is considered as being composed of two confining units: half of the effective thickness belonging to the lower Cape Fear confining unit (CU2) and the
other half belonging to the upper Cape Fear confining unit (CU3), even
though the upper Cape Fear confining unit (CU3) is not present. In general, the confining ·unit is divided into N + 1 equal parts, where N is the number of missing aquifers. Although the transmissivity of the missing aquifers is
60
~;,',.1, . -' ·~i .. ; .~
. .
I~ \ .,
/ .. ~
;t ..
lol1,{ ~,.. ❖.,;' i!<1,, • A•-
\,'::}: . . ,· lt~t·,:-
~~--
REF. 23 ..
f,:: .-;··_;:..:c.··: :~-:·'-;· -
. GEOLOGY AND GROUND-WATER·
... _,._._,,_.,.-RESOURCES
'·· · · ··.. of the ·•-~-
~---..... i . .:. .:.. ·: .• :.
SlViNQ'uARTER ARE( NORTH CAROLINA ... -•' ·-. . . ·· .. , •-,,:
Division of Ground Water ·
GROUND-WATER BULLETIN NUMBER 4
NORTH CAROiINA
DEPARTMENT ()F WATER RESOURCES
\
RALEIGH·
.. 1964
~~}T!':,, •~1:•·· ;·,;r:~t,g~-:~J~J~t!t~r~0J~?f'fi,: , ,.·,:•··
·: -.< ..... ,,·.:··?;~:~~: .?\·_{)_;/.;:~-:---\ .. :.?
Collection of
G. C. Niche Ison
GEOLOGY AND GROUND-WATER
RESOURCES
of the
SWANQUARTER AREA, NORTH CAROLINA
BY PERRY F. NELSON
GROUND-WATER BULLETIN NUMBER 4
NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES
w ALTER E. FULLER, Director
DIVISION OF GROUND WATER
HARRY M. PEEK, Chu;/
RALEIGH
1964
II fflt"":'WM
WASHINGTON COUNTY
Area 336 Square Miles Population 13,488 (1960)
Washington County is bounded on the north by Albemarle Sound, on the east by Tyrrell County, on the south by Hyde and Beaufort Counties, and on the west by Martin· County. The county occupies a part of the low, flat plain of the Pamlico ter-race, with the exception of the western border which is under-lain by an older marine terrace and is slightly higher in eleva-tion than the rest of the county.
Principal Aquifers
Washington County is underlain by a thick section of sedi-mentary deposits ranging in age from Cretaceous to Recent, and consisting mainly of sand, clay, marl and limestone. Only the formations of Eocene age and younger are consid.ered to be sources of fresh water supply in the county, as the depth of the older formations and the relatively high mineral content of the water preclude their use as sources of supply. The beds of sand and marl of Paleocene age that underlie the Eocene rocks in Washington County may constitute a source of fresh water sup-ply in the southwestern part of the county. However, data con-cerning the geologic and hydrologic nature of the formation and the quality of the water contained are not adequate to determine the potential of the formation as an aquifer. A cross section of the formations generally penetrated by water wells in the county is shown in figure 20. Tlie Castle Hayne aquifer is highly productive and the prin-cipal source of water supply in western Washington County. The aquifer consists predominantly of porous and permeable limestone and lies at a depth ranging from about 120 feet in the western part of the county to 400 feet in the eastern part (fig. 20). Yields of several hundred gpm are obtained from wells of four to eight inches in diameter that penetrate only 15 to 30 feet of the aquifer. Considerably higher yields can probably be obtained from wells that penetrate a greater thickness of the formation.
The Yorktown aquifer, comprising all the confined water-bearing beds above the Castle Hayne aquifer, has been devel-oped extensively as sources of domestic water supply in the county, and is the chief source of supply in the eastern part
53
~l~fff1 ·::: ..
. : .:.,. :_. · ... -~·\./~:-:
l ~;Y.«':;,~cc_:,;;.,.,,r,:,._,,,ij,:~,'.W, ··1 r:~~--t~~~rt~tr:::?1r1;;mrit:?~} . t ~,~.er,:.~--:-:_.~ .. ~_.;.-;<::t.':??~r:¾z;-:·~\:<:• ' :
,~:--. ~ .. .-: ... •:-,_-:;.: ... J:>~•~:·,: }l
... _~· . .::-:.· :·-,:•::::~ :.::-; .:.:~:·-::.; --.1.--.:;: ~-
:, ·. ,:;:
f:; ,; ;-:: ir l~f~'.li-,S.·,, 1;: ;;t,~ ''1'!,:,;:,~.:. · , i~~ ·-~:~;£t:IS:.~~ ~\~•;,..;~~ '<:~ ·~· ~ -~~~-x-.~ ,1t--,&-.!.,,t; .,,-v,,. ! ~--!· , .... :.,,,,~ ........ -~~~r.<1~~-r~....,-~
Jal
where it is about 300 to 350 feet thick, In this area, the aquifer
offers a shallower and less highly mineralized source of water
supply thari the Castle Hayne aquifer, Yields from individual
wells range from 5 to 60 gallons per minute, A 6-inch well, 135
feet deep at State Prison Unit 019, was pumped at a rate of
60 gallons per minute for 12 hours with 7 feet of drawdown,
indicating a specific capacity of 8,5 gallons per minute per foot
of drawdown, In the western part of the county, the phosphatic
sands in the lower part of the aquifer should provide moderate
yields to wells completed at depths of 150 to 200 feet.
The non-artesian aquifer yields water to numerous dug or driven wells throughout the county. Wells completed in this
aquifer range from 10 to 30 feet in depth and yield from 3 to 20
gallons per minute, Most wells in this aquifer are now being
used as supplemental rather than a primary source of supply.
Water Levels
Water levels in the Castle Hayne and Yorktown aquifers are
everywhere within 10 feet of the land surface, Figure 7 shows
the configuration of the piezometric surface of the Castle Hayne
aquifer in Washington County, In low areas, particularly in the
northwestern part of the county, where the elevation of the land surface is less than that of the piezometric surface, flow-
ing wells occur,
The water table, or upper surface of the non-artesian aquifer,
is within a few feet of the land surface, The water table re-
sponds rapidly to local variations in the amount and distribu-
tion of precipitation, and may during periods of drought fall
below the bottom of some sha'llow wells. The· hydrographs in
figure 21 show water level variations in selected wells in the
county during 1962,
Water Quality
Ground water in Washington County, although not of uniform
quality, is satisfactory for most domestic uses, Water from the
Castle Hayne limestone is characteristically hard, may be locally
high in iron and may contain objectionable amounts of hydrogen
sulfide, The chloride content of water in the Castle Hayne
ranges from 10 parts per million in the southern and southwest-
ern part of the county to 750 parts per million in the Creswell
56
.. fr:~',:i~'.:...71.0.:'i:/. :-::: ~-~f:.-;/~£Jti~ .
I~~-:~~-;~~:~;:!..:~:~ l,;.::~.'.:.'!t~;{+~-;:..,~~Y, ~~~ '':-,:.' -~-• ~ • ',.,_ )-z::i:~_..,,-,,., .. ..1,-t-;,.,.\.~-;.:-,"";,-.:,,1.;:,,.._,;~Mf; • ~lmm;i ~'-.,-~• ,J :1 ~:.-~;~µ:';·{./:t°"T,~ :~::~~-;~;-,.-1~.:t~~11 ~ (.,, i ,i:~~~~~ : r.t!~ ,.:... ~,.. ::~~ i •~~f•,• .. ,,;:~,_:-•,-,,5 ~"'-"-! 'Z • Y-:.,•.-,: -~\-t~~ ~'); i, )~""'r,,,c:• . .,, ·\•,p.:v~,;-...;-::0 it,.,;.;..,_.:~,.,-'\',.-.~, · .•:..." J:<1•..+-J/'-1."'J'j" ~ -~•f?~,. r-4-~~x •~:..'.it,:' ,,..,~ :-~~ ... ._-,;,.: -.;,-,:•~--,~-:~ .. "(,,. ... i;•.;.: ,-.ri'.-.f.\s',1~ l•.r . .:'i-.,.;.'•J" '•~·~ f.. • ,:;~ ,,,,,~,;;,:,,;,-'c,,·,;:.;~,,,,.,:fJ,:-~,,; : , i}( .,"~~'%"'1.;(,"\1;fa}'b.~il:~t ,,.,,,,r);,o;:;,, -if.~~ ?. ':r,:, , .. ,-; ,-~~-/y:;;:~-;. -::~ t>J:::·~:;t.Jtt~ ., -~ ~-"' ~ ~~:~~;·~~~~;~ ~~:~t:fS~l:-~~.. ~""'-_fj:i.,. ~\ "t~i~~;t, ~~tf~-~;.~~fi}S~j:::ft1\1~~~~-· 'w· ~ • ~-•si,/fil_ ! jr};1_~: ~1;,~t}1~}~~~~,~~~~~~/'_'ft-' "~. ll'~~l~ ';"<>•i'" ,,.;-,·,:•.-.·, ~,Ji' Nr'1r"' . iii}; ·ilili ~,,.,, ~'fl< ~ '?•-""il~s~:.r !'.•. ,, ~ ,. . ,,;,~ •, .. .; .. :·_-.,,:,. ,:;.:. ~ ·: ..... '" ..... :~:£~.1{h;:~. ~--.... ~•~~1,1 ... -:,.-r.,-~~--)::rJ:\;;:r;:,£.}!!, -!,.~;~~:j.~:!::.~~~~-3{~~1 . , }?.(. ~~., .,-,, .• I;~~.
----·--·· 1···
I
I ,
l
-!!!!!! lllliii:a liiii -- - - -- - -
I!!!!!!
18 17 16 15 14 13 12
-~ 'o -~ -~ .
~ . ~
CHOWAN COUN Y
-.J__ __ ---1-------1---------lf------l-----\ , _,c./_-_,..,.-+------r
\) " o........----0 ::.---•
'· ~eEM•R~E •
------~-..1__ -----
Georgia-Pacific Corp. Hardwood Sawmill
NCD 000 813 592
..
BEAUFORT COUNTY
,
'
Figure 19.-Map of Washington County showing location of wells
H y
__ J _____ ]j_
' ·-
D E ' COUNTY,J
~I
•
~
e ,
~ p
u
-
15
b ~.
,., 0 ' ~·
" m o-,
0
--
3 6"00
LEGE N 0
L
l:15~ 5-minule quodran9,l1
o,b, etc.• l·minut, quodronQlt
O·' 0 Wtll Olld numbu
Un1ld1 l•mlnutl
~~JI!~~~~~ r
4 W1Lf9
H
'J
K
L
,.,,,_,,JeYel-Swanquarter •""' -area showi
--ng aquifer use d -an water
""""" . l!!!!!!!I ---l!!!l!I 1!!1!11 l!!l!!5' !!!!!I 1111!!1 19
l!!!!!!!!I ---
tm71i::,-,rJJi"!'9!i'I:!'.:
REF. 24
7 Z-WfffEW RMI • ·rffJ~·
ID -~r:
t,:. •
. 'i'; ·-1,;tf: National Water Summary-North Carolina 329 lt:i,,l~~t¥" tJ.f-· ·-~~.~~~~~ttJr;~~~~~!-i?fJ)~i~~:~~:·\?.1?.:::~ff~?:~-.~ !~~-:::;1~;~1~;~f{~f~:;~¥;~:~~i~-~~3f~;;J~~q;~;~::~--~~i?f~\I{;;;~:: Ei,l,r.· ·· NORTH CAROLINA•'h· ,· ,·· .. •c,·soo·.:.••l""''••"·:..••'''',-:;,,1,,• . .,,.,,.,, .• --,-... ,.·., -~ ... -•. ,, .,, .. ,,,.-. ·se;.-:.· ..• -, . .s\·· ... ~r.?iR,~~~i1£~':~?~~~~,~;~t11~~1t~;;~:2:szfvE :f :,:i~~t~i~~: ~CJ:~r.{ttff:·;,:. Ground water is a vital natural resource in North Caroli-Table 1. Ground-water facts for North Carolina I :,._~~,-na Ground water supplies more than 3.2 million people,or [Withdrawal data rounded to two significant figures and may not add S:::::_,. ab~ut 55 percent of the State's total population. Its economic to totals because of independent rounding. Mgal/d == million ~~t': significance is substantial, particularly in the Coastal Plain gallons per day; gal/d = gallons per day. Source: Solley, Chase, ~,e:;·.....,..·_ province (fig. I), where high-yielding aquifers supply most and Mann, 1983] I~~--municipalities, industri7s, rural ~reas, and livestock. In the _____ P_o_p_u_l_a_ti_o_n_s_e_rv_e_d_b_y_g_ro_u_n_d_w_a_t_e_,,_1_9_8_0 ____ _ -, ·~ ~ ... , Piedmont and Blue Ridge provmces, ground. water serves
3,234
• !f!:'
Number (thousands)--

-

-

-

-

-
~..::.:...;...._ slightly more than one-half of the 4 million residents (Mann, Percentage of total population _ _ 55 'Y ·1¢.17:.-•, 1978). Besides withdrawals for public supply, the largest From public water-supply systems: I k-;.-ground-water withdrawals in the State are for mining and Number (thousands) -----~-:: . quarrying operations and process water for a number of textile Percentage of total population-:: ,;r~1:-·· and chemical industries'. Withdrawals for irrigation represent From rural self-supplied systems:
474
• 8 . • .
Number (thousands) -

-

-

-
-•r,;..._;_ a small, but increasing, percentage of total ground-water use, 2,760
47 I Percentage of total population-~:::·. particularly in the Coastal Plain. Ground-water withdrawals ~~-: -for various uses and other related statistics are given in table 1. Freshwater withdrawals, 1980 1-, • . <&~:-:.
Surface water and ground water, total (Mgal/d) -8,100
770
JO
GENERAL SETTING Groundwateronly(Mgal/d) ..•......
•
~; __ :-_.::._ North Carolina is located in three physiographic prov-Percentage of total--

-

-
--

-

-

-

-

-

-
Percentage of total excluding withdrawals for 3r··. inces-the Coastal Plain, Piedmont, and Blue Ridge (fig. I). thermoelectric power .. ______ . r .. ~.1, • The Coastal Plain aquifers generally are unconsolidated and 20
I
LI~t.,;.. • consist of beds of sand, gravel, and limestone separated by clay or clayey layers and lenses. These strata dip and thicken ,._
i'~ southeastward and together comprise a wedge lying on crystal-f,'.;~·, · line bedrock (fig. I). The Piedmont and Blue Ridge provinces :;tr.;..· are, for the most part, underlain by massive crystalline and 1.-. • -, metamorphic rocks that are covered nearly everywhere by a Jr.~--:, ... · claye~ o
1
r sadnd
1
y
1
r7golith consisting of weathered parent rock ,,._ matena an a uvium. ~~i
l•tit;.·
,1;'J,..;:.-
'10.1. ,--. t"""!')'.
lr_·::~~--
/t£...¢..-Iii~-;.
I~-~:"''
t.iJ~ J;,C..-• F':'. i·
if{-;.~--. 1::,.-~ ,t··.
i~_,~=-
-·y-
Recharge to the ground-water system in North Carolina is derived from precipitation that fanges from about 44 to 54 inches (in.) in the Piedmont and Coastal Plain provinces and from about 40 to 80 in. in the Blue Ridge province (Eder and others, 1983). The amount of precipitation that recharges the gr0'und-water system averages about 20 percent of annual precipitation (Winner and Simmons, 1977; Daniel and Sharp-less, 1983). Most ground-water recharge moves through shal-low aquifers and discharges to streams; only a small part (less than 1 in. in the·Coastal Plain) recharges deeper aquif~rs.
PRINCIPAL AQUIFERS
The principal aquifers in North Carolina are the surficial, the Yorktown, the Castle Hayne, and the Creta_ceous located in the Coastal Plain and the crystalline rock aquifer located in the Piedmont and Blue Ridge provinces. These aquifers are described below and in table 2; their areal distribution is shown in figure I.
SURFICIAL AQUIFER
The surficial aquifer is a near-surface deposit of either marine-terrace sand and clay, or sand dunes. It is a principal aquifer in three areas where it is commonly more than 50 feet (ft) thick-the Sand Hills in the southwestern Coastal Plain, the narrow coastal strip of barrier islands called the Outer Banks, and the easte'rn one-half of the mainland north of Pamlico Sound (fig. !) .. In the Sand Hills, where the aquifer may be more than 250 ft thick, it serves as a source for public supplies and irrigation for numerous golf courses (North Carolina Department of Natural Resources and Community Development, 1979). Water from this aquifer in the Sand
Category of use
Public-supply withdrawals:
Ground water (Mgal/d)---

-

-
Percentage of total ground water-Percentage of total public supply-Per capita (gal/d) ---

-
Rural-supply withdrawals:
Domestic:
Ground water (Mgal/d)-
Percentage of total ground water -Percentage of total rural domestic Per capita (gaJ/d) -

-

-

-

-

-
-Livestock:
Ground water (Mgal/d)--

-

-

-
Percentage of total ground water -Percentage of total livestock -

-
Industrial self-supplied withdrawals: Ground water (Mgal/d)--

-

-

-
Percentage of total ground water-Percentage of total industrial self-supplied: Including withdrawals for thermoelectric power Excluding withdrawals for thermoelectric power Irrigation withdrawals:
Ground water (Mgal/d)--

-

-

-
Percentage of total ground water-Percentage of total irrigation -

-
70
• 9
12
148
140
18
JOO
51
33
4
85
490
64
6
17
39
• 5
30
Hills area has dissolved-solids concentrations less than 25 milligrams per liter (mg/L) and hardness less than JO mg/Las calcium carbonate; the pH commonly is below 6, making it corrosive. Sands that form the Outer Banks are the only source of freshwater along much of the northeastern coast. The freshwater in these sands often has a dissolved-solids concentration of 500 rng/L and hardness of about 200 mg/L as calcium carbonate. On the mainland north of Pamlico Sound, the surficial aquifer ranges from 50 to 200 ft thick and may yield as much as I million gallons per day (Mgal/d) to single wells or small well fields. Here, water from the aquifer usually has dissolved-solids concentrations of less than 200 mg/L and hardness of less than I 00 mg/L as calcium carbon-ate; the pH, however, may be as low as 5, which renders the
:;
,!
!
I .I ,, ;
.i.
I(
r i I
,\
;
'
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
330 National Water Summary__.:Ground-Water Resources
Table 2. Aquifer and well characteristics in North Carolina
[Ft = feet; gal/min = gallons per minute; mg/L = milligrams per liter. Sources: Reports of the U.S. Geological Survey and the North Carolina
Department of Natural Resources and Community Development]
..
Well characteristics
Aquifer name and description Depth (ft) Yield (gal/min) Remarks
Common May Common May ... :•
range exceed range exceed
Surficial aquifer: Sand, silt,
clay, and gravel. Generally
unconfined or partially
confined.
Yorktown aquifer: Sands and
clay. Partially confined or
confined.
Castle Hayne aquifer: Limestone,
sandy limestone, and sand.
Generally confined.
Cretaceous aquifer: Sand, clayey
sand, and clay. Confined.
Crystalline rock aquifer:
Crystalline igneous,
mCrlasedimentary and metavolcanic
rock. Semiconfined to confined.
40-65 175
50-150 190
70-200 400
100-600 800
75 -200 300
water corrosive. The aquifer generally is unconfined to par-
tially confined throughout most of the Coastal Plain, but
where it is more than 50 ft thick, water usually is confined in
the deeper parts due to differences in lithology.
YORKTOWN AQUIFER
The Yorktown aquifer is present at shallow depths in the
northern Coastal Plain. A few high-producing wells tap the
Yorktown. Elizabeth City in Pasquotank County draws 1.3
Mgal/d from a well field that taps the aquifer. Water in the
Yorktown aquifer generally has dissolved-solids concentra-
tions of less than 500 mg/L and hardness of less than 300
mg/Las calcium carbonate.
CASTLE HAYNE AQUIFER
The Castle Hayne aquifer is the most productive aquifer
in North Carolina. Wells that yield more than 1,000 gallons
per minute (gal/min) can be readily developed in this aquifer
and yields may exceed 2,000 gal/min. The Castle Hayne is the
major source of freshwater in the southeastern coastal area
where nearly all other aquifers contain some saltwater. Water
from the Castle Hayne aquifer usually has a hardness ranging
from 80 to 300 mg/L as calcium carbonate (Wilder and others,
25 -200
IS -90
200-500
200-400
5-35
500 Important aquifer in Sand Hills, northeast
North Carolina, and Outer Banks.
Water only slightly mineralized, except
at depth in coastal areas where it is
salty. Iron problems common.
Equivalent to Columbia aquifer in
Virginia.
500 Includes Yorktown Formation and minor
sands in Pungo River Formation.
Important aquifer in northern Coastal
Plain. Water is salty in coastal areas.
Iron problems common. Equivalent to
Yorktown-Eastover aquifer in Virginia.
2,000 Includes Belgrade and River Bend
Formations, Castle Hayne Limestone and
Beaufort Formation. Castle Hayne
Limestone is major aquifer in eastern
Coastal Plain. Iron and hydrogen
1,400
200
sulfide are problems near aquifer's
western limit. Water is salty at depth
near coast. _,/
Includes Peedee, Black Creek, and Cape
Fear Formations. Most widely used
aquifer in Coastal Plain. Water has
low mineral content. Iron problems
common. Water is salty at depth in
eastern Coastal Plain. Equivalent to
Potomac aquifer in Virginia and
Black Creek and Middendorf aquifers
in South Carolina.
Large well yields dependent on
interception of fractures; sustained
yields dependent on thickness of
saturated regolith overlying fractured-
rock aquifer. Dissolved Solids average
about 170 mg/L. Water slightly
acidic and may be corrosive. Locally
high in iron and silica.
1978) and requires treatment for some uses. It commonly
contains concentrations of silica higher than 50 mg/L. The
aquifer generally is confined, except near its western limit
where it is unconfined or partially confined.
CRETACEOUS AQUIFER
.... ~
;;i
. t:· _,,.:
-;~;
,\ri!
--=~·,
/J.;.~~ . ~-·
·-· ,-. i~~
FJ:-:. ·-•
• ·,y,. .,:;{ :;:g
-•~5.:£---•'-f'-•·-"'ffl..:: •-Ja,.;;" .__,,., .
The Cretaceous aquifer is the principal aquifer in much of
the central and southern Coastal Plain. The aquifer has only
moderate hydraulic conductivity but is very thick. For this
reason, a number of well fields in the Cretaceous aquifer are ·-=
able to produce more than 1 Mgal/d. Water from the Creta-. _ . ·
ceous aquifer typically is soft with hardness commonly less . ;
than 20 mg/L as calcium carbonate. The water occasionally ~~-:. t
contains concentrations of fluoride higher than 1.5 mg/L, the."-?'~~
maximum limit for public supplies in this area. The aquifer is :t,,it'"
confined throughout its areal extent. . ..:~z.:.,.
.. --~ '-\(({'i
CRYSTALLINE ROCK AQUIFER -·i'f
The crystalline rock aquifers of the Piedmont and B!ue 1F~--·
Ridge provinces consist generally of fractured cryst:i!!,ine
igneous and metamorphic rock that has low porosity and,
therefore, little storage capacity. Well yields are sustained by
water stored in the saturated regolith that overlies the f~a~.-
'
EXPLANATION
□ Surficial aquifer
1~.11 Su rficial aquifer and .~· Yorktown aquifer
Yorktown aquifer
Castle Hayne aquifer
Castle Hayne aquifer and
Cretaceous aquifer
Cretaceous aquifer
Crystalline rock aquifer
Not a principal aquifer
A-A' Trace of cross section
A
Sea level
-1000'
-2000'
C
National Water Summary-North Carolina
0 50 100 MILES
A'
0 20 40 MILES
Figure 1. Principal aquifers of North Carolina. A, Geographic distribution. B, Physiographic diagram and divisions. C, General-
ized cross section (A-A'}, Coastal Plain. (See table 2 for more detailed description of aquifers. Sources: A, C, compiled by R. W.
Coble from U.S. Geological Survey and North Carolina Department of Natural Resources and Community Development files. 8,
Fenneman, 1938; Raisz, 1954.} ·
331
I·
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
332 National Water Summary-Ground-Water Resources
tured bedrock. Success in constructing high-yield wells in this
terrane depends on interception of water-bearing fracture
systems that are overlain by saturated regolith. The chance of
intercepting interconnected fractures is greatest in valleys and
draws and least on ridges and hilltops. The average yield of
wells in the crystalline rock is low-about IO to 25 gal/min;
however, yields of 200 gal/min or more are common. Water
from the crystalline rock has a dissolved-solids concentration
that is commonly about 170 mg/L and rarely exceeds 250
mg/L. Hardness generally is less than 100 mg/L as calcium
carbonate. Because of the low buffering capacity of the water,
corrosion can be a problem where the dissolved-solids concen-
tration is less than 100 mg/L, even though pH values range
from 6.3 to 6.7.
OTHER AQUIFERS
Triassic basins within the crystalline rock terrane of the
Piedmont are areas from which the principal aciuifers are
absent (fig. I); these basins consist of downfaulted blocks of
crystalline rock. The basins are filled with clay, silt, fine-
grained sandstone, and conglomerate, into which, in some
places, basalt dikes have intruded. In this terrane, chances of
constructing wells that yield more than a few gallons per
minute are slight.
GROUND-WATER WITHDRAWALS AND
WATER-LEVEL TRENDS
Major areas of ground-water withdrawals and water
levels for selected observation wells near pumping centers are
shown in figure 2. Generally, water levels decline in response
to increases in pumping and recover when pumping is reduced.
The hydrographs in figure 2 are representative of response of
water levels to pumping in the Coastal Plairi.
Water-level declines are not widespread in the surficial
aquifer. Pumping I Mgal/d from a battery of shallow wells
near Elizabeth City (near location I, fig. 2) _ resulted in no
measurable decline in water level in an observation well only
0.5 mile (mi) from the well field.
Only minor withdrawals are made from the Yorktown
aquifer, which is readily recharged; thus, major areal water-
level declines have not occurred in this aquifer. In the Belhav-
en area, withdrawals of 1.2 Mgal/d have resulted in less than
10 ft of decline in 16 years as shown by the hydrograph
(location 5, fig. 2).
The largest ground-water withdrawals in North Carolina
are from the Castle Hayne aquifer to dewater one mine and
three quarries. About 65 Mgal/d are withdrawn from the
confined Castle Hayne aquifer to reduce the artesian pressure,
thereby facilitating dewatering of the overlying phosphate ore
beds. Water levels in the Castle Hayne have declined 5 ft or
more over an area of 1,300 square miles in response to this
pumping (North Carolina Groundwater Section, 1974). The
hydrograph for the Castle Hayne observation well, which is
adjacent to the mining area (location 6, fig. 2), shows the
rapid decline in water level when pumping began in 1965;
stabilization of the water level was achieved in 1966 when the
amount of induced leakage into the aquifer and a reduction in
the amount of natural discharge from the aquifer compensat-
ed for the amounts of withdrawal. Changes in water level
since the late 1960's are the result of fluctuating pumping rates
and movement of the center of pumping as different parts of
the· ore body are mined. Other withdrawals from the Castle
Hayne aquifer range from 11 to 18 Mgal/d at three quarries
(locations 8, 11, I 6, fig. 2). Because the Castle Hayne general-
ly is unconfined in the area of the quarries, the geographic
extent of the cones of depression is limited.
Widespread withdrawals from the Cretaceous aquifer
· have resulted in continuing declines in water levels in this
aquifer throughout much of the Coastal Plain. The Creta-
ceous aquifer observation well (location 7, fig. 2) reveals that,
after a well field was established near the observation well in
1968, water levels have declined more than 80 ft. Periods of
water-level recovery and apparent stability are the result of
short periods of decreased withdrawal rates. Water levels in
the Cretaceous aquifer in the northern Coastal Plain have
declined over an area of several thousand square miles in
North Carolina because of withdrawals of 35 Mgal/d or more
near Franklin, Va., 10 mi north of the State line. Declines
near the line (location 26, fig. 2) have been as much as 45 ft
since 1966 and are estimated to be as much as 100 ft since the
early 1940's when extensive withdrawals began.
Water-level declines because of withdrawals from the
crystalline rock aquifer are not widespread. Water pumped
from the aquifer is supplied from the saturated portion of the
overlying regolith. Recent research shows that withdrawals
from the crystalline rock aquifer are reflected in local cones of
depression in the overlying regolith (Daniel and Sharpless,
1983).
GROUND-WATER MANAGEMENT
--~:;;.11'· -~,-,,~,
·:fr.:~ : ?. ;·_,,l
•~fl -" :fml
The North Carolina Department of Natural Resources :;~~,~
and Community Development (NRCD) implements most of .. ~-J:~
the regulatory and planning procedures related to grouncf--< :_t.4
water resources in the State. The Division of Environmental · ~"?•~·
Management (DEM) within NRCD, has the major responsibil-\.J~ffit. l
ity for ground-water management and regulatory programs. -'·, •-'.,~.:ii.ti The Environmental Management Commission has authority , ..... ,1
over the pi;rmitting process and has made the Groundwater -.,.A~~{
Section of DEM directly responsible for issuing permits for -~i1it;
well construction and ground-water withdrawals. The Com-·~·:~
mission may designate an area as a Capacity-Use Area .. ;.;~:?~
· whenever the renewal and replenishment of the ground-water ~~,~
supplies are believed to be threatened. To date, the Commis-• ;::'l.~-
sion has established only one such area in east-central North ·--~rf! .
Carolina. However, additional areas are being considered for --~
Capacity-Use Area designation. ·;'.~~'!~
A permit must be obtained from the Groundwater Sec--;~~..:i~
tion of DEM for (I) the construction of public-supply, indus-... ::½;~i •.
trial, and irrigation wells, (2) wells with a designed capacity of -";;) 1
100,000 gallons per day (gal/d) or greater, (3) wells to be used _.;~~I,
for injection, recharge, or disposal purposes, and (4) a well, · 'i:.,~t,
other than a domestic well, located in a designated Capacity-, ..:.1~
Use Area (North Carolina Well Construction Act of· 1967, -~·i•~
Article 7-87-88). Injection wells for waste-disposal purposes -1~:.tf'
currently are prohibited by State statute. All well drillers must ·. ".•t~f
register annually with NRCD and are required to report all .,·
well completion and abandonments. ~:4·
In addition to a water-use permit in Capacity-Use Areas ---~~
for users withdrawing more than 100,000 gal/d, NRCD also ::;:l':,,,
may require these users to adhere to established maximum . ;,;r~~
withdrawal rates; the agency also can establish the minimum -...::::2'. ~
water levels resulting from pumping in certain areas. ~itr
The NRCD pivision of Water Resources (DWR) collects· '4M
data on the use of ground water statewide through its water• -,;,_·r.,l
use data program. The DWR includes ground water in special • ......,_~
regional or river basin water-resources studies with primary .~}fJr,
emphasis on the availability of ground water to meet w~ter-· -~,.~~-~ l.;
supply needs for municipal and industrial use and for agncul-; -.'-/:if'lt..V.S
tural irrigation. The DWR also provides technical assistanc~ ,:,~~l~}t1:f
to local goverment water utilities in considering ground water . '•\~~miiiti.,,."' . . I , ... ·11!Jli/<_.~ , as a. source of supply for public-water systems. Techmca ; •. :J[@:&',~-t ·
information on ground water is also available through the · · · .•t~~
Iii '► ,\ ' • ::;!:· ,;
'·
To: File
/~ From: G.Doug Rumford~
Date: 6/12/95
Subject: Weyerhauser Co.-Plymouth
Plymouth, Martin County, NC NCO 991 278 540
REF. 25
Memorandum
Telephone Conversation with Mr. Harold Mccarson
On this day, I spoke with Mr. Harold Mccarson (919-793-9466), Business Development Manager with Hydrologic, Inc., the company that administers the Plymouth water system. Mr. Mccarson told me that the city system is supplied by 4 groundwater wells; 3 of the wells are approximately 185 ft deep and 1 well is approx. 115 ft deep. The Plymouth water system supplies drinking water to about 4119 people within the city limits. Washington County purchases water for distribution to residents outside the city limits. According to Mr. Mccarson, the water system is sampled on a yearly basis for VOC'S, SVOC'S, and inorganics and has not shown any indications of contamination.
Mr. Lee Smith, County Manager of Washington County was also contacted. He confirmed that the county buys water from the city for distribution outside of the cityJjmits. The county provides water to 1850 customers.
__ , ?W·NW t @liLrm IIWW
' __ ,.. ·~· .. ~ ~--
I
I
I
I
g
n
u
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
MEMO
TO:
FROM:
Superfund Section Staff
Jeanette Stanley
Environmental Chemist
NC Superfund Section
DATE: August 15, 1996
REF. 26
SUBJECT: Update on Status of Wellhead Protection Programs in N.C.
I spoke with Mr. Randy Prillaman, Hydrogeologist, NC DEM [phone]. He said that the Wellhead Protection Area implementation plan written by him and submitted to US EPA in late Dece~ber I 994 has been approved. This plan calls for protection of a whole ·area based on a calculation using recharge rate and pumping rate as variables.
North Carolina now has primacy in approval of wellhead protection areas. None have yet been implemented. Several requests for approval have been received but no areas have yet been approved. Mr. Prillaman said that he could not project a date when a plan would be approved.
,.
I
I
0
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
REF. 27
Memorandum
To: File
From: G.Doug Rumford
Date: 10/11/96
Subject: Georgia-Pacific Corp. Hardwood Sawmill
Plymouth, Washington County, NC
NCD 000 813 592
Groundwater Population within 4-mile radius
The population of groundwater users within a 4-mile radius of the site was estimated by
utilizing a topographic map house count and identifying the extent of the town water distribution
system. The extent of the Plymouth City and Washington County water system was determined by
referring to Figure 3 of the Greenhorne and O'Mara Phase II SSI Report for Georgia-Pacific
Hardwood Sawmill. The water lines were then superimposed on the Georgia-Pacific site topo map
(Fig. 1) and the residences without access to the system were counted as private well users. This
was accomplished by a topographic map house count combined with a windshield survey within the
1 /2-mile distance ring. The nearest groundwater residence is located approx. 1.3 mile east.
According to the 1990 census, there are 2.72 persons persons per household in Washington County.
The number of people served by the city water system( 4119 city; 1850 county) was added to the
groundwater user population within the1-2 mile distance ring as this is where the wells are located.
No community wells other than the Plymouth city wells were identified by the NC Public Water Supply
System database.
Distance Ring G.W. Residences Groundwater Pop
0-1/4 mi. 0 0
1/4 -1/2 0 0
1/2 -I 0 0
I -2 7 5989
2-3 145 395
3-4 194 528
Total 346 6912
I Attachment.
I
I
I
I
--I!!!!! I!!!!!!! liiiiiil liiii iiiil iiilil --l!!!!!!!!I l!!!!!!I l!!!!!!'l
REF. 28
. f'ly,,.o,v-/1--. ?r-lfDt. -"1-7 / 'i ·7~;J.,."f;:) ;;;_ 7
. 1,,/ r-> / hL ?I rtWt .I/-71 3 -'i 1../ b t.,
Cr?-/( /( f'I?"' ,,v,t,,€c/ ff~J:.,lf r',-v/
. HAROLD F. McC11, ,~(Jei, vf1. .. , . ("'/tJ/L/4-. BUSINESS D[VEL0/lfv1[:,Jl Mr\r~AG.ER
HYDRO[OGIC~ INC
P . .:· 3GX 13029
;,s:-iEViLl.E. r~c 23814-002S : ,:1,:_::1cE: ?o.i-25,:_5,G9
TOl.~ FREE: (l00-23~-8&&~1
::z"·LYr.':/l.;; STHEd
f\SHEIJ!LLE, :\:C 2.e80i
i'.;iX:)04,-252-9711
! iOidE'. 704-667 :S8GG
RECEIVED
MAY l l 7995
SUPERFUND SECTION
......... ,'./•, .
~s.'~;®W~[f®liOlliID@UOU TI 9 ~UO@®[f~®~Glfr@@l
II .. ··_·
;!c._
·."!: ..
11
LABORATORY ID#, 37715
WATER SYSTEM ID#, 04-94-010
NAME OF SYSTEM, TOI-/N OF PLYMOUTH
·sYSTEH TYPE, (E) (E=ENTRY POINT;
COUNTY: WASHINGTON
S=SPECIAL; W=SOURC~)
TIME1' 08: 10 AM·<;•/ ... , ,.·, COLLECTED ON: 01/10/95
LOCATION WHERE COLLECTED:
LOCATION/SOURCE CODE: 001
809 WASHINGTON STREET (WATER PLANT)
COLLECTED BY.r WILLIE C. DAVIS
HAIL RESULTS TO,
'fYPE Ol,' SYSTEM
( X ) .. ..CO~H-IUNITY
.( ·) NTNC
RECEIVE.D
MAY 111995
SUPERFUND SECTION
au
II TOWN OF PLYMOUTH
P.O. BOX 806
( ) NON-COMMUNITY
( ) PRIVA'J;E
PLYMOUTH, NC 27962
II WATER SOURCE
-TELEPHONE·; (919) 793.:9101 ... -· -. -·-·· -.-:· .· . -?l ~~~~~~E ,r·--c~~~~ .. ---·--·-.... ·---~~;~----· --·····-~W II· .. ~~~P:~:::HENT --..•..
.::.. .• _. CODE NAME CODE RESULTS LIMITS II ( ) NONE ii ~;;;·-~;~~~;~-~;~~-----------~;;---:;~;~;----;~;;;--11 ix! ~~~:i~:~~g
,...,~,-1010 BARIUM, mg/1 125 <0.100 2.000 II ( ) FILTERED
'
'·· ..• 1015 CADMIUM, mg/1 125 <0,001 0.005 II ( ) ALUM
1020 CHROMIUM, mg/1 125 <0.005 0.100 II ( ) LIME
~.. 1024 CYANIDE, mg/1 . 148 <0.005 0.100 II ( ) SODA ASH
I.::· __ 1025,,.FLUORIDE, mg/1 107 0.74 4.000 II ( ) CAUSTIC
1028 IRON, mg/1 101 0.013 0.300 II ( ) WATER SOFTENER
:. · 1032 MANGANESE, mg/1 101 <0.010 0.050 II ( ) POTASSIUM PERMAN.
,,,_· -.•• 1035 MERCURY, mg/1 103 <0.0002 0.002 II ( ) P04, IRON CONTROL
• 1036 NICKEL, mg/1 101 <0,010 0.100 II { ) P04, HANG. CONTROL
~ -1045 SELENIUM, mg/1 125 <0.010 0.050 II ( ) P04, CORR. CONTROL
c.=.~ 1052 SODIUM, mg/1 101 298.0 NIA l,L'=={=)=O=TH=E=R=•;;;;~---,_ · 1055 SULl'ATE, mg/1 137 37 N/A Ir Iii! · 1074 ANTIMONY, mg/1 125 <0.0012 0.006 II ~ -1075 BERYLLIUM, mg/1 125 <0.0001 0;004 II
if',:;,,•.. 1085 THALLIUM, mg/1 125 <0.001 0.002 II l==--1925 pH, Units 135 7. 7 G 6. 5 II
II
I
LABORATORY NOTE
A result preceded by the 'less
than' symbol must be less than
the standard or QC used which
must be one-fifth (1/5) of the
allowable limit. ,.-( ) SAMPLE UNSATISFAC'rDRY -( ) RESAHPLE REQUESTED
:: ~te· Analyses Begun, . 01/10/95 Time Analyses Begun, 2,00 PH
Time Analyses Completed, 5:00 PH te Analyses Completed: 01/24/95
Certified By, DB
tnments,
i··
I-;0039
~(-. . ,
...:::!!;·,. -
Laboratory Analyses -Environmental Consultants
•• ••-•--•• "• • • •-•• •• • •• •• • ••·. • • • _,,..:..:• ..... -~•••• ••••• •• •• ••'·.,-.•-•,...,__,-• A-~•:•~--• •n ·••••~ _ ...... ••--•-• ••·•-••-•• ~••••· •~•• ~• •
·''-"· .,, .. ..,~-· -
-,·:ooworr®uouilil@UOfr TI 9 ~uo©®D'~®D'®fr@r~J
-·--
, P.O •. BOX 7085, 114 OAKMONT DRIVE · . PHONE [phone]
r .. · ~1;1:!iYIJ,,..l-1:, .N,Q,. 2~35:70~? .. .... . . ..... ··-.: ; .. · ..... , . , . . . ... · ............. , •• ~ •.• ,.,: .• ~, : .... "'·''··~·-• ... .fl\?'.<. (!lWl ?~§:Q§~~-
'. ~ -. -~·.-.
11>: .I.J\BORATORY ID#, 37715
NITRJ>.TE_/NITRITE.
:c. ·_:::_WATER-SYSTEH ·ID#·c 04-94-010 .. COUNTY: WASHINGTON.
II· '" NAME OF SYSTEM, TOWN OF PLYMOUTH r · .,. SAMPLE TYPE, ( E ) ( Em ENTRY; SaSPECIAL)
. _~COLLECTED ON DATE, 01/17/95 (MM/DD/YY) TIME, 07, 10 AH(Ht!,MM AM OR PM)
Ii · LOCATION WHERE COLLECTED:
·~ ;, ~CATION/SOURCE CODE, 001 COLLECTED. BY1 WILLIE C. DAVIS
' , ..
MAIL RESULTS TO:
TOWN OF PLYMOUTH
P.O. BOX 806
PLYMOUTH, NC 27962
TYPE OF SYSTEM
( X) COMMUNITY
( ) N'fNC
( ) NON-COIIMIJNI'rY
(. ) PRIVATE
p--TELEPHONE [phone]
( X) GROUND
( ) SURFACE
~------L-... l.Y..I.J~~~!L_. _ __,...
) SAMPLE UNSATISFACTORY
TYPE TREATMENT,
( ) NONE
( X) CHLORINATED
( ) FLUORIDATED
( ) FILTERED
( ) ALUM
( ) LIME
( . ) SODA ASH
( ) CAUSTIC
( ) WATER SOFTENER
( ) POTASSIUM PERMAN.
( ) P04, IRON CONTROL
( ) P04, HANG. CONTROL
( ) P04, CORR.CONTROL
( ) OTHER ___ _
j c:z::1:z::.:;11a::;.=ca1:1.::i::1.mmcmsi1:11:c:>m••==-=a=:ic~.
·', .-•••• , • _._ .. , .:.-:·:-. • • ;_ ••.· :,.:.~-·---,. •• : >-. .: • ,~: '·":" -·
) RESAMPLE REQUESTED
'l'IHE ANALYSIS BEGUN, 02100 PM
TIME ANALYSIS COMPLETED,05,00 PH
CERTH'IED BY, DB
Laboratory Analyses -:-. Environmen_tal Consult9f/(S:F ,, ,,'.:'. ·.: : i , . , . • .
... .• .•••.. . , ....•.•.. ··-··-···· • ... ,. -----· ·---~---·-·--, _______ .,.• .. , ........... ·.~·· ... ., •.••. ,, .,u:. •• :.:i....:.--.; __ f,.L ... --_...,\ ___ , ---···-·--_ "'-, .... , : .
I:,;·· .
'·( i,.<,:•.~"-
. -·'LABORATORY ID#: 37715
I~ WATER SYSTEM ID#, 04-94-010
NAME OF SYSTEM, TOWN OF PLYMOUTH
. -
COUNTY, WASHINGTON
RECEIVED
MAY 111995
SYSTEM TYPE, ( E) (EaEntry Point; S Special)
i . ·coLLECTED ON, 10/19/93 (HH/DD/YY) TIME: 8:00 AH(HH:HH AM or PM
.. LOCATION WHERE COLLECTED 1 . 809. WASHINGTON STREET :-: .. .WATER PLANT. ·-. . ..
LOCATION/SOURCE CODE: 001 COLLECTED BY, JOHN W. CARROLL
SUPERFUND SECTION
I :,
HAIL RESULTS TO, I ,.
1·r·:.
TOWN OF PLYMOUTH
P.O. BOX 806
PLYMOUTH, NC 27962
TYPE OF SYSTEM
( X) COHHUNITY
( ) NTNC
( ) NON-COMMUNITY
( ) PRIVATE
WATER SOURCE
( X) GROUND
· · TELEPHONE, [phone] ( ) SURFACE ,_: ____________________________________________________ ~---~-:~~=~~~------------------------
. , • NOT
I CONTAH HETH. DETECT. DETEC. QUANT. ALLOW. REGULATED(R)
CODE CONTAMINATE CODE LIMITS (X) RESUL'l'S LIMITS UNREGULATED(U; ---------------------------------------------------------..
:: 2005 I 2010
2015
, 2020 I ;:~;··•
. '2031
f;1 2032
1--2033
: 2034 ,. 2035 I.., 2036
. ;-2037
• 2040
12041
2042
-·-2043
12044
. 2045
.. ,.
Endrin, mg/1
Lindane, rng/1
Methoxychlor, rng/1
Toxaphene, rng/1
Carbary!, mg/1
Hethornyl, mg/1
Dalapon, mg/1
Diquat, mg/1
Endothall, rng/1
Glyphosate, rng/1
Di-2(ethylhexyl)adipate, mg/1
Oxarnyl (vydate), mg/1
Simazine, rng/1
Piclorarn, rng/1
Dinoseb, mg/1
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene, mg/1
Aldicarb Sulfoxide, mg/1
Aldicarb Sulfone, mg/1
Metolachlor, mg/1
. 204
204
204
204
. ... 235 ..
235
203
242
241
240
206
235
207
203
203
204
235
235
207
0.00001 X 0.002 R
0.00002 X 0.0002 R
0.0001 X 0.04 R
0.001 X 0.003 R
0.00073 ... X .. · ........ ____ . N/A :-.J·•• ·.u.,.
0.00016 X N/A u
0.001 X 0.2 u
0.0004 X 0.02 u
0.009 X 0.1 u
0.006 X 0.7 u
0.0006 X 0.2 u
0.002 X 0.07 R
0.00007 X 0.004 u
0.0001 X 0.5 u
0.0002 X 0.007 u
0.0001 X 0.05 u
0.0005 X 0.004 R
0.0008 X 0.003 R
0.00036 X N/A u
IJ~~~~~;f,~J~ey;~iJ;t@~i.;L~4;{~£~.:i:'::~:,:jJ~,;~;si;~~~~~;;;;;;~;,;;tf~~~i;j;.fa~~~tP1£4,~J;Jk~2;~i ;~,,~;'.~;-,;_,;;:;.;_:~,.i-L~",'• ·_ .. ·:.·:,.;1:;~L
P.O. BOX 7085, 114 OAKMONT DRIVE . .. . ,,_, _ _ . ":' • i-,, _._ . PHONE [phone] . IR!f f SY!l.l,E:,. !':!.-.C,.£?83§-?ll~!? ., ..... ---·.-;, ..•. ,.~:~.x;..c;~'.,;,'--'i-:c::!~L""~"~"" "'"'-'-'·'·'-'''""'~';""'°'····--, •·' .• , .. "· fM (~1 ~) .. 7§§-:9.§~ •.
.. PESTICIDES AND SYN'rHETIC ORGANIC CHEMICALS (continued)
I LABORATORY ID#: 37715
1· COLLECTION DATE,
I CONTAM
CODE
10/ 19/93
CONTAMINATE
I ;~~~
2047
12050
2051
2063
2065 ·
i. 2066
2067
2070
2076 I·. 2077
2105
2110
i 2274
2298
2306
i 2326
2356
2383
2440 i 2595
'2931
· 2946
12959 ·
. ' ---~ ---. ·-.
' .•.
Carbofuran, mg/1
Aldicarb, mg/1
Atrazine, mg/1
Alachlor, mg/1
2,3,7,8-TCDD(Dioxin), mg/1
Heptachlor, mg/1
3-Hydroxycarbofuran, mg/1
Heptachlor Epoxide, mg/1
Dieldrin, mg/1
Butachlor, mg/1
Propachlor, mg/1
2,4-D, mg/1
2,4,5-TP (Silvex), mg/1
Hexachlorobenzene, mg/1
Di-2(ethyhexyl)phathalate, mg/1
Benzo(a)pyrene, mg/1
Pentachlorophenol, mg/1
Aldrin, mg/1
PCB's, mg/1
Dicamba, mg/1
Hetribuzin, mg/1
DBCP, mg/1
Ethylene Dibromide (EDB), mg/1
Chlordane, mg/1
SAMPLE UNSATISFACTORY
('nate Analyses Begun: . 10/19/93 l--1:_~te Analyses Completed, 01/17/94
•
Laboratory Log# 8115-101993-001
_Comments, Contaminant codes 2032, 2105, &
· . When analyzed, contaminant code
1-:-'
1·
WATER SYSTEM ID#, 04-94-010
LOCATION/SOURCE CODE, 001
NOT
HETH. DETECT. DETEC. QUANT. ALLOW. REGULATED ( R)
CODE LIMITS (X) RESULTS LIMITS UNREGULATED(! ------------------------
235 0.0008 X 0.04
235 0,0005 X 0.003
207 0.0001 X 0.003
204 0.00002 X 0.002
250 5.00E-09 X 3.0E-08
204 0.00004 X 0.0004
235 0.00063 X N/A
204 0.00004 X 0.0002
204 0.000008 X N/A
207 0.0037 X N/A
207 0.0027 X NIA
203 0.0001 X 0.07
203 0.0002 X 0.05
204 0.0001 X 0.001
206 0.0006 X 0.006
243 0.00002 X 0.0002
203 0.00004 X 0.001
204 0.00002 X N/A
204 0.0001 X 0.001
203 0.00030 X N/A
207 0.00039 X N/A
219 0.00002 X 0.0002
219 0.00001 X 0.00005
204 0.0002 X 0.002
RESAMPLE REQUESTED
Time Analyses Begun: 3,00 PH
Time Analyses Completed, 4:00 PH
Certified By, DB
2033 by laboratory #18700.
2063 by laboratory #37747.
R
R
R
R
u
R
u
R
u
u
u
R
R
u
u u
R
u
R
u
u
R
R
R
I . . . · Laboratory Analyses . ..,.. Environmental Consultants/.i.:"'·>i•. --·· ·. / 1039 ..... ··•·-· .... · ... " .. ··•····· -.... c._c .• , ... r. ..• -~---........ -C ..• ..o.s----'-'--" "'"''-"--~-'-'-" '-~"'"""'-"'-"""'-'--'"''"'-'-'=•2;,e~.::Cc&,;,~.;.,,_.;,"'·•'··•c ...... c I
w·z ITWdYP"''W'!C-ci'::e:::ne:rrnwmtli:ifT~Y!f?lr3/::~Z::1!'iffli:e\'N:?f1
~-:1 ~ foo-~□U'®mJOiJil@OO,fr _ TI~ ~oo@®U'OJ®U'GJfr@@l
,.·' . . . , ...
LABORATORY ID#, 37715.
WATER SYSTEM ID#, 04-94-010 COUNTY, WASHINGTON . NAME OF SYSTEM: TOWN OF PLYMOUTH _ I--SYSTEM TYPE, ( E ) (EcEntry Point; SmS_pecial; WmSource) . -COLLECTED ON: 06/14/94 (MM/DD/YY) TIME: 08:00 AH(HH,H!1 AM or PM) -LOCATION WHERE COLLECTED: 809 WASHING1'0N ST -WATER PLANT i: WCATION/SOURCE CODE: 001 COLLECTED BY, JOHN CANSIU.
TYPE OF SYSTEM
I MAIL RESULTS 'fO, ( X ) COMMUNITY
( ) NTNC 'I'Olftl OF PLYMOUTH ( ) NON-COMMUN!l'Y
I 806 BOX ( ) PRIVA1'E PLYMOUTH, N.C. 27962
1'YPE 'rREA'rHEN'r
( ) NON-CHLORINATED I 1'ET,EP~O~:__( 9_1_9_), '.:3~=•-~--66--■-•---~---~---~--c __ .... __ (-~~~-=~~=N~=~?. __ c-~--~ --,~c O ___ -"
CON'rAH MJ::THOD DETECTION DETECTED QUANTIFIED ALLOW. CODE CON'rAMINATE CODE LIMITS (X) RESUL'!'S LIMITS -------------------------------------------------------------p-Isopropyltoluene, mg/1 217 0.0005 X N/A Chloromethane; mg/1 217 0.0005 X N/A DCDfluormethane, mg/1 217 0.0005 X NII\ Bromomethane, mg/1 217 0.0005 X · N/A Chloroethane, mg/1 · 217 0.0005 X N/A ' . Fl uorotnchloromethane, ir,g / l 217 0.0005 X N/A Hexachlorobutadiene, mg/1 217 0,0005 X N/A Naphthalene, mg/1 217 0.0005 X N/A 1,2,4-TChlorobenzene, mg/1 217 0.0005 X 0.07 c-1,2-DChloroethylene, mg/1 217 0.0005 X 0.07 Dibromomethane, mg/1 217 0.0005 X N/A 1,1-Dichloropropene, mg/1 217 0.0005 X N/A 1,3-Dichloropropane, mg/1 217 0.0005 X N/A 1,3-Dichloropropene, mg/1 217 0.0005 X NIA 1, 2, 3-TChloropropane_, mg/1 217 0.0005 X N/A 2,2-Dichloropropane, mg/1 217 0.0005 X NIA 1,2,4-THethylbenzene, mg/1 217 0.0005 X N/A 1,2,3-TChlorobenzene, mg/1 217 0.0005 X N/A n-Butylbcnzene, mg/1 217 0.0005 X N/A 1,3,5-THBenzene, mg/1 217 0.0005 X N/A tert-Butylbenzene, mg/1 217 0.0005 X N/A sec-Butylbenzene, mg/1 217 0.0005 X N/A Bromochloromethane, rug/1 217 0.0005 X N/A Chlorofonn, mgll 217 0.0005 X A Bromof on1,, mg/1 217 0.0005 0.0160_ N/A
REGULATED
(R,U)
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
R
R
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
VOLATILE ORGANIC CHEMICALS(continued)
I . 2943 BDChloromethar,e, 111,;tl 2944 CDBromomethane, mg/ 1 · 2955 Xylenes (Total), mg/1
•~0_ 2964 Dichloromethane, mg/ 1
'
. -2965 o.:.Chlorotoluene, mg/1 . 2966 p-Chlorotoluene, mg/1 ·· • ·. · 2967 . m-Dichlorobenzene, mg/1
'
';..;.. 2968 o-Dichlorobenzene, mg/1 -2%·99--np-01chlorobe11zene, 111911· . ,. 2976 Vinyl Chloride, mg/1
'
. · ·,_·--2977 1, 1-DCEthylene, mg/1 .. 2978 1,1-DCEthane, mg/1 fc 2979 t-1,2-DCEthylene, mg/1 .,-,.,;.,;-;,:-2980 1, 2-Dichloroethane, mg/ 1 l :'.~2981 1,1,1-TCEthane, mg/1 .',; ·2982. Carbon Tetrachloride, mg/1 -~ · .~. · 2983 1, 2-Dichloropropane, mg/1
'
' · ·::: •. ·2984 t' Trichloroethylene, mg/1 ,',. 2985 1, 1,2-TCEthane, mg/1 .,,:.c,c 2986 .1, 1, 1, 2-TCEtharie, mg/ 1 •:,-.ci';/ 2987 TChloroer.hylene, mg/1 l-:···2988 · 1,1,2,2-TCEthane, mg/1 :7'.: 2989 Chlorobenzene,mg/1
•.,."'.''. 2990 · Benzene, mg/ 1 I. · 2991 Toluene, mg/1 :.2 2992 Ethylbenzene, mg/1
...,.::.;;2993 Bromobenzene, mg/1
'
,.·: 2994 Isopropylbenzene, mg/1 .,,...2996 Styrene, mg/1 c-·2998 n~Propylbenzene, mgll
If·( J SAMPLE UNSATISFACTORY
I·,= Date Analyses Begun, 06-14-94 ~ Date Analyses Completed, 06-27-94
. Comments, I. ,_~-Laboratory Log # 8115-061494-001
NOT
WATER SYSTEM ID#, 04-94-010
LOCATION/SOURCE CODE: 001
METHOD DE'fECTION DETEC'l'ED QUAN'1' rnco ALLOl4. REGULATED CODE LIMITS (X) RESULTS LlHI'fS (R,U) ------
217
217
217
217
217
217
217
217
21/
217
217
217
217
217
217
217
217
217
217
217
217
217
217
217
217
217
217
217
217
217
--------------------------0.0005 0.0011
0.0005 0.0048
0.0005 X
'. 0.0005 X
· 10.0005 X
0.0005 X
0.0005 X
0.0005 X
0.0005 X
0.0005 X
0.0005 X
0.0005 X
0.0005 X
0.0005 X
0.0005 X
0.0005 X
0,0005 X
0.0005 X
0.0005 X
0.0005 X
0.0005 X
0.0005 X
0.0005 X
0,0005 X
0.0005 X
0.0005 X
0.0005 X
0.0005 X
0.0005 X
0.0005· X ...
------
NIA
A
10
0.005
NIA
N/A
NIA
0.6
0.0,j
0.002
0.007
N/A
0.1
0.005
0.2
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
Nlh
0.005
N/A
0.1
0.005
1
0,7
NIA
NIA
0.1 .,
NIA
u
u
R
R
-U
u
u
R
·H
R
R
u
R·
R
R
R
R
R
R
u
R
u
R
R
R
R
u
u
R
u
RESAHPLE REQUESTED
'rime Analyses Begun,
Time Analyses completed,
Certified By, DB
3,00 PM
4100 PM
10039 ;~,,:c·.c,;c:, ""' '""'.;_.,_"""'"''c""'·"'dc./;-:.~2t~X!;~!ffl~ :;:;:-,£1!!,"!C.'l!.~£!!!/L.fe'!~H!!~!s, ;;';;,, ..
■f Tftzm11St7'=':tt:JllW''T'W::e:fMl·rnw: eu,·r:r:n:r arrnmrerz:n-rec·:n -r -':C'W7"P
Subject: Weyerhauser Co.-Plymouth
Plymouth, Martin County, NC
NCO 991 278 540
Surface Water Pathway Flow Rates
REF. 29
Memorandum
:rre:w r::r·m•,:i:xrot:t·tez_T":00:::: ..
The average annual flow rate for the Roanoke River, 8900 els, was taken directly from the
text of USGS Water Supply Paper 2221. The drainage area for Welch Creek was not published in USGS Open-File Report 83-211, therefore, a digital planimeter was used to estimate the creeks' drainage area as 10.4 square miles. Using the mean annual runoff at the site obtained from Water Resources Report 88-4094, the flow rate of Welch Creek was determined;
Attachment. '
Drainage Area x runoff / 13.58 = els
10.4 sq.mi. x 15 in/yr/ 13.58 = 11.5 els
zr::srrr@1
p p . lriCMlf(f:mr1 wsi:1!'" m .,_ ,,,,, :e: ··a trtil!'rtM:irft'ihlfC: n,u•y » v:rw-r'1etr··we::tte~r:M1itn&df1'♦i"..,,,..lf'I
\Nater-Resources Investigations Report 88--1094
MAP OF MEAN ANNUAL RUNOFF FOR THE
NORTHEASTERN, SOUTHEASTERN, AND
MID-ATLANTIC UNITED STATES,
WATER YEARS 1951-80
)
\
\
)
\
\
·,., .... ·.\:-:· "-
M1ssrssrPPr
< 0 •
\
\
0
'..::..-:::-.
.. ::J~Jl
. ·-,-.. ~.-::~~~n
<~~J/'..
--~ ~~JI'
, ..... ,.,-~ --~-)_, -...· '~ . ~~ ; -. ~ i) 1../' -~/~!·· .. · -,,..;,. r ·---,_
\
Prepared i11 couperatio11 ll'it/z tlze
_U.S. l:__nvironmental Protection Agency \..J3f:'.,f-~, , . "'' .. ··:Jt~-. . .
.):.:,,,,
•~;,)Y.\
I) ,-
1
I
I
I
I
I-·: ...
.. I ..
I:
i~
-i
i
I
I
sions that the methods that used the area-weighted average of the_ drainage area or. the centroid of the drainage area produced somewhat better correlations-that is, the interecept was closer to zero, the standard
errors were small, and the correlation coefficients were larger. These methods have slightly greater power to
predict actual runoff
Additional statistical investigation found no significant
differences in reliability of the runoff estimates among the areas. No significant differences existed in the errors for stations with drainage areas of differing size.
USE OF MEAN ANNUAL RUNOFF MAP
Mean annual runoff for a site can be estimated from the runoff map by several methods. The simplest
method of estimating the runoff is to locate the site on the runoff map and to identify the runoff contour nearest the site. This method, however, is less accurate than other methods. The most accurate method is to draw the drainage basin on the runoff map, and use the runoff contours to divide the basin into bands of differ-ing runoff. The area of each of the bands within the drainage basin is then determined. The areas of the separate bands are then used to compute a weighted average runoff for the basin. For example, if 50 percent of the basin is in an area of 18 in/yr (inches per year) of runoff, 30 percent in an area of 20 in/yr of runoff and 20 percent in an area of 22 in/yr of runoff the mean annual runoff would be calculated as follows:
( 0.5 xl8 + 0.3 X 20 + 0.2 X 22 = 19.4
Runoff estimated from the map is in inches per year, averaged over the entire drainage basin. Multiply this value by the drainage area, in square miles, and divide by 13.58 to convert to mean annual discharge, in cubic feet per second. In the above example, assume the drainage area of the site is 100 mi2. The mean annual discharge, in cubic feet per second, would be:
19.4 xl00/13.58 =143
The runoff map was prepared to allow estimation of mean annual runoff at sites where no streamflow data are available. The map represents mean annual runoff for areas with natural land cover. Caution should be used in applying the map to estimate runoff for areas that are not natural land areas. The runoff map should not be used for areas, such as large urban areas, where the land cover has been altered in ways that would change the amount of runoff. The runoff map is not applicable for lakes or bays, for coastal wetlands affected by tides, for streams controlled by reservoirs large enough to influence the total annual streamflow, or for streams with substantial diversions.
Local features could cause the runoff at a particular site to differ substantially from the runoff indicated by the runoff map. The geology of the drainage basin might cause substantial amounts of water to enter or leave the basin as ground water. This could substan-tially increase or decrease the runoff. For example, a stream with a small drainage area that includes a large spring probably would have higher average streamflow than indicated by the runoff map.
Table 5.-Descriptive statistics of errors in estimated runoff · at 93 test stations
~
Method
Area-weighted
Centroid
GIS
Nearest-inch
Nearest contour
Area-weighted
Centroid
GIS
Nearest-inch
Nearest-contour
Mean
absolute
value
2.0
2.2
2.7
2.8
2.8
9.0
9.8
12.0
12.1
12.2
Mean
Error, in inches
--0.35
-.71
-1.74
-1.77
-1.79
Percent error
--0.54
-.71
-6.42
-6.20
-6.26
Standard
error of
mean
0.30
.33
.37
.38
.39
1.3
1.4
1.6
1.6
1.6
Standard
deviation
2.9
3.1
3.6
3.7
3.8
12.9
13.5
15.9
15.6
15.8
··-~
,, -r{;~t.\_
• .. 11
. . .
i ·' i
;.. j
\, \.
:r· rrrcrrrr ·, re, r-·7· r, ·c•·v::::w •w"1c-r··v=:riu1 ·mttc=t>?c'2:Tflt:'5T"'t''IDtaYNh"'VI:....,'IG:'fl2Y:ist"":7"1Y'fM;f;'i1')NS¥'k""'tt!"'ai"!r";'fnt:tw\"f'3!!2':u:ti!'z"
l'.·tif }: .. ,:
.,: .,_
!-~~efl;'vi
lr,•1~t.. ·
·•-·· . ~;·.7't.:.:-i,,' .
i-:~::··· Hydrology of Major Estuaries
I And Sounds of North Carolina
1; By G. L. GIESE, H.B. WILDER, and G. G. PARKER, JR.
I
i Prepared in cooperation with the
North Carolina Department of
Natural Resources and
Community Development
I
I
I
I
1-
1., -
i= ·. -' -.
-~ ·•.
i
• i
U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WATER-SUPPLY PAPER 2221
IJ
W,---4 + E!!tM?'HPTi:tiW s tt1 n« H?9"eD"Mf?'e?iir' d"'tJDP:TCW,CFU'z'tZftsfli'::i'MC"ll'-:57t:Z:JriC'rm:,(j•·;r-.mm:;:wr:•' t 1
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
DONALD PAUL HODEL, Secretary
U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY
Dallas L. Peck, Director
UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE: 1985
For sale by the Distribution Branch, U.S. Geological Survey,
604 South Pickett Street, Alexandria, VA 22304
library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data
Giese, G. L.
Hydrology of major estuaries and sounds of North
Carolina. ·
(U.S. G~ologic.:il Survey w.iter-supply pJper; 2221)
Bibliography: p. 105
Supt. of Docs. no.: I 19.-13: 2221
1. Estuaries-North Carolina. 2. Sounds Geomorphology-
North Carolina. 3. Hydrology-North Carolina. r.
\Vi[der, Hugh B. 11. Parker, G. G. Ill. North Carolina.
Dept. of Natural Resources and Community Develop-
ment. IV. Title. V. Series: Geological Survey water-
supply paper ; 2221.
GC97.G54 . 1985 551.46'48 85-000158
J ·:e•JHt;ili"R':'8ii':fffl:'tl':;;ws:7i:.,rl?tSX1S'fts".:'-ffl.IW
.. l
·---
II
11
I
. _,
11-
" ._. ·-.
' 1r ... ....... I_ ,_.
-,
I.:_
--
1:
I
I
. :i'
I '•
,erffiifflf¥~TV'.2li!ff0'1Ntl'3i'tTI::CTh'.S
lation. This scatter may he due to several faclor~-the dif-
ferences in within-year distribution of discharges, year-to-·
year differences in prevailing wind speed and __ direction,
and variations in regulation patterns of reservoirs on the
Roanoke River which, as previously mentioned, have a
direct influence on moderating saltwater intrusion in ·Al-
bemarle Sound and. indirectly. into the Chowan River.
THE ROANOKE RIVER ESTUARY
The total area of the Roanoke River basin (pl. I) is
9.666 mi2 , the largest of any Nnrth Carolina estuary.
However, only 3.506 mi2 of the drainage lies in North
Carolina; the other 6,160 rni2 arc in southern Virginia.
The Roanoke Ri\·er originates in the Valley and Ridge
Province west of Roanoke, Va .. and flows in a general
southeasterly direction toward the Atlantic Coast, empty-
ing into Alhemarle Sound about 7 miles downstream from
Plymouth, N.C. Principal tributaries include the Dan. Fal-
ling, Otter, and Blackwater Rivers. The limit of lunar tide
effects in the Roanoke River has not been well estah-
lishcd, but is thought 10 be near Hamilton, about 60 miles
upstream from the mouth.
The gr_eatest width of the estuary, near the mouth,
is only about 0.3 mile and-. upstream from Plymouth,
widths are about 0. i mile or less. The narrow width of the
Roanoke near the mouth is in sharp contrast to the_ Neuse,
Pamlico, and Chowan Rivers which arc several miles
wide at their mouths. The lower Roanoke, like the others
are now, was once a drowned river valley. Now. how-
ever, it has been largely filled by sediments. \Vithin the
dClta thus fonned· is a fairly unusual system of dis-
tributaries (fig. 4.24) which carry some water from the
Roanoke into the Cashie River and, in the case of one
large unnamed distributary, directly into Albemarle
Sound. Maximum depths along the estuary vary from
about 8 to 18 feet. A commercial navigation channel is
maintained in the Roanoke River to Palmyra, 81 miles up-
stream from the mouth. The channel is maintained to 12
feet deep and 150 feet wide from Albemarle Sound to
about I mile upstream from Plymouth, a distance of 10
miles; thence a channel 8 feet deep and 80 feet wide to
Palmyra, a distance of I 8 miles.
Average annual precipitation over the basin is about 45
inches. The average annual outflow of the Roanoke River at
the mouth is ahout 8.900 ft 3/s. second only to the outflow
of the Cape Fear River among North Carolina ·s estuaries.
Flow of the Roanoke River is highly regulated, par-
ticularly by Roanoke Rapids Lake (details to be discussed
later). The combination of relatively high outllow. small
cross-sectional areas, and low-flow augmentation by
Roanoke Rapids Lake. effectively blocks saline water
1 00 Hydrology of M;tjor Estuaries and Sounds of North Carolina
from the estuary. During I 3 years (October 1954-Sep-
tember 1967) of daily water sampling at Jamesville (sta.
0208 l 094 on pl. I). the maximum measured chloride con-
centration was only 12 mg/L. Three .specific conductance
surveys by the Geological Survey during normally low-
now periods (October 6, 1954, July 25, 195,7. and Oc-
tober I. 1957) failed lO reveal any significant saltwater en-
croachment. even at the mouth. Significantly, the survey
of October 6. 1954, \Vas made before increased low-flow
augmentation from Roanoke Rapids Lake and at a time of
record low strcamflows in many parts of the State. At that
time, near maximum-of-record saltwater encroachments
were being measured on other estuaries. ~hus, it is not
lik~ly that any significant saltwat"er encroac_hmcnt will
occur in the future in the Roanoke River estuary, even·
under extreme drought conditions. as long as the current
flow regulation patterns arc maintained.
Flow
Flow in the Roanoke River estuary has not been
studied in detail: thus it is not really known what role
winds play in the flow or to what· extent the flow. is af-
fected by tides. We can infer that winds and tides play a
lesser role here than in any other m:.Uor North Carolina es-
tuary because of the relative narrowness of the channel
and the lack of significant funneling effects. Conversely,
we. can infer that freshwater discharges play a relatively
larger role because of the greater magnitude Of the dis-
charges in relation to channel cross-sectional areas. How-
ever, validation of these inferences awaits confirmation
from water-level records and flow measurements.
As previously mentioned. the average annual out-
flow of the Roanoke River at the mouth is about 8.900 ftJ/
s, or about 0.92 (fr'ts)/mi2. but average flows for a given
year may range from about 0.50 io 1.50 (fr'ts)/m? (fig.
4.25). Actually, discussion of freshwater inflow to or out-
flow from the Roanoke River estuary is not really mean-
ingful except within the context of the existing patterns of
flow regulation. Flow of the Roanoke River is extensively
regulated by Philpott Lake, John H. Kerr Reservoir,
Roanoke Rapids Lake, Leesville Lake, Lake Gaston, and
Smith Mountain Lake. All of these reservoirs were created
primarily for hydroelectric power generation. but many
also provide for flood <..:ontrol, low-flow augmentation,
water s.upply, and recreation. Because it is 1he most down•
stream of these reservoirs, Roanoke Rapids Lake is most
important from the point of view of its effects on flow in
the Roanoke estuary. Pursuant to its license from the Fed-
eral Power Commission, the Virginia Electric and Power
Company must maintain, subject to special provisions.
minimum instantaneous !low releases from Roanoke Rap-
ids Lake (drainage area 8,395 mi2) according to the fol-
lowing schedule:
I iS(Fr:'S¥:r!7i1t·
i1',1: ' ---
.;f>t:
-J··.-
;,..1 f~ ·
WINDSOR
__\1,/_.J.'.--
.>I.(. •• ~ -
--'1L .• ...JIL.
zn ·:::rrn=1· F
--"'--_..._ • ..:JL_ _,.,_ __ _.:.:.... J.: __
......... -...'.U.. • ..I:.. _,JL..
-·---___ -.,..t_ ..-1{.. .JL .-->-IL...~°J,_
~s--':; .-
i,_:.:
"--·-J:... -_i.k_ • -__ if_ __ _
--..,,v ___ _
~-..'l'.... ~
-·-"'-
r
.L
N
. -..ill...: : •
~--•.;,_ • ...:.le'...
..>'.... -• -_ __:,J.,_ . ....:JL.
~ • ...IJL.
...!..!.... -..'1L
-· ..'i::. -"'-
"" 0 2 3 4 5 MILES
0 2 3 4 5 6 8 KILOMETERS
~--';, -~:-· Fig~re 4.24. Distributary system of the lower R.oclnoke River.
-~-~--1\/ i11i11111111 ill.'i((ll/f(l/ll'(}l/5_
.flrm-. in_!i3/s
. ~~-.January. F~bruary. i\·brch· .. 1.000
-~i~:~r;,,f n~r t~~~
'-',~_.\'O\'.cmbt:r. Dcccmht:r ........................ 1.000 I:::'~-Usually, actual releases from Roanoke Rapids Lake
· !:,.exceed these minimum requirements. as indicated hy
I ... eas~red nows of the Rrianoke River ·at Roanoke Rapids
. ta: 02080500 in pl. I). Given he low. in cubic feet per
__:~11_!~--arc estimated averngc monthly outflows ar the
I ~10~th of the Roanoke River estuary for the period Oc-
·•~5r 1965-Scptember 1975. About 87 percent of these
IP,o_w amounts are accounted for by· controlled releases
'om Roanoke Rapids Lake .
~-. ,.
I
January -····· 10,000 July 8,000
February. 12,000 August 7,500
March 10,000 September 6,500
April 11,000 October 6,500
May 10,000 November 7,500
June 8,500 December 8,300
The effects of high-flow fegulation arc reflected in
the similar avCrages for January--May; flood flows are
stored in the various reservoirs and released over long
periods of time. Low-flow augmentation i.s apparent from
the relatively high August-Noveriiber flows: they average
about 0. 72 (ft3/s)/mi2 compared to only about 0.57 (ft3/s)/
mi:2 in the unregulated Chowan River estuary for the same
months.
Hydrology of the Albemarle Sound Estuarine System 101
= t or·., lllC1
NUS CORPORATION AND SI
:· "
CONTROL NO. DATE: July 19, 1990
REF. 30
TELECON NOTE
TIME: 9:45
.. -~ 1-----------------''---------------''--------------i
"l-" DISTRIBUTION:
Georgia Pacific Hardwood Sawmill
NCD00813 592
TDD No. F4-8909-89
~
11t fl 1-B_E_TW __ E_E_N_: _M_r_-L_o_n_g _______ ,-O_F_: _W_a_s_h-in_g_t_o_n_C_o_u_n_t_y_W_a_t_e_r __ r-P-H_O_N_E_:_(9_1_9_)_7_9-3--4-1_1_4 ____ -;
Department
AND: Louis McAdams, NUS Corporatio j:
I It •' ·: ...... -.
I .
••
·._· .~-
,.
••rk.:.
~---It .. ,.
--~,._-_,.,.
,_ j:-·
1··
ft·
• -·
DISCUSSION:
Subject: Extent of water service in the Plymouth area
Service from Plymouth includes: East on N Oto Socona Church, east on Highway 64 past Macedonia to State
Road 1319 to Pleasant Grove; south on ,ghway 32 to Sawyers Trailer Park approximately 0.5 mile from
Morantack Road (south); west on Highway.
Conni bay Creek Walkway is OfF' )lankin Lane in the city of Plymouth, Boy Scout Nature Trail sponsored by the
city.
No surface water intakes are located on the Roanoke at or east of the city, and none are on the Albemarle Sound
that he recalls; the Sound is brackish and salt water.
. ' ··il. ,:-
\!
~
II
REF. 31
}t ;; ; ::;;:1: :;[;;':~:!&, >;i;' ~;'J!ii: 'if i1§:;;;;;;;;;1':r1i'1i~'i{~';:l!:'1;~;1 ';~~t~l!~
?':t':=:?:~f)t
Reprint from North Caronna Administrative Code: 15A NCAC 28 .0313
Current through: February 1, 1993
' lt' .
I
I
D
I
I
I
i!
I~
,-·:
'~· •--· 1--·
1.~ .. -1--~
\-·r
,··-1
I I ,·-
,.
'
EHNR -ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT TISA: 02B .0300
SECTION .0300 -ASSIGNMEl\T OF STREAM CLASSIFICATIONS
.0301 CLASSIFICATIONS: GENERAL (a) Schedule of Classifications. The classifications assigned to the waters of the State of North Carolina are set forth in the schedules of classifications and water quality standards assigned to the waters of the river basins of North Carolina, 15A NCAC 2B .0302 to .0317. These classifications are based upon the existing or contemplated best usage of the various streams and segments of streams in the basin, as determined through studies and evaluations and the holding of public hearings for consideration of the classifications proposed. (b) Stream Names. The names of the streams listed in the schedules of assigned classifications were taken as far as possible from United States Geological Survey topographic maps. Where topographic maps were unavailable, U.S. Corps of Engineers maps, U.S. Department of Agriculture soil maps, and North Carolina highway maps were used for the selection of stream names. (c) Classifications. The classifications assigned to the waters of North Carolina are denoted by the letters WS-l, WS-ll, WS-lll, WS-IV, WS-V, B, C, SA, ·sB, and SC in the column beaded "class." A brief explanation of the "best usage" for which the waters in each class must be protected is given as follows:·
Fresh Waters
Class WS-l:
Class WS-1!:
Class W S-Ill:
Class WS-IV: f
Class WS-V:
Class B:
Class C:
Tidal Salt Waters
'Class SA:
Class SB:
Class SC:
waters protected as water supplies which are in natural and undeveloped watersheds; point source discharges of treated wastewater are permitted pursuant to Rules .0104 and .0211 of this Subcbapter; local programs to control nonpoint source and stormwater discharge of pollution are required; suitable for all Class C uses; waters protected as water supplies which are generally in predominantly undeveloped watersheds; point source discharges of treated wastewater are permitted pursuant to Rules .0104 and .0211 of this Subcbapter; local programs to control nonpoint source and storm water discharge of pollution are required; suitable for all Class C uses; waters protected as water supplies which are generally in low to moderately developed watersheds; point source discharges of treated wastewater are permitted pursuant to Rules .0104 and .0211 of this Subcbapter; local programs· to control nonpoint source and storm water discharge of pollution are required; suitable for all Class C uses;
waters protected as water supplies which are generally in moderately to highly developed watersheds; point source discharges of treated wastewater are permitted pursuant to Rules .0104 and .0211 of this Subchapter; local programs to control nonpoint source and storm water discharge of pollution are required; suitable for all Class C uses;
waters protected as water supplies which are generally upstream and draining to Class WS-IV waters; no categorical restrictions on watershed development or treated wastewater discharges are required, however, the Commission or its designee may apply appropriate management requirements as deemed n=sary for the protection of downstream receiving waters (15A NCAC 2B .0203); suitable for all Class C uses;
primary recreation and any other usage specified by the "C" classification; aquatic life propagation and survival, fishing, wildlife, secondary recreation, and agriculture.
shellfishing for market purposes and any other usage specified by the "SB" and "SC" classification;
primary recreation and any other usage specified by the "SC" classification; aquatic life propagation and survival, fishing, wildlife, and secondary recreation.
NORTH CAROLINA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE 10122/92 i
·!
I
i
fl
I ,I
!
I
I
I
I
• II
II
--:--. ,~
"!Ef:7J'iifr"11w;s:rew&Y!" .... .....--,;;• ---··2·0 r
EHJ,R -ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEHENT
.0313 ROAJIOKE RIVER BASill
Name of Stream
Blue Hole Swamp
!".atthew Slough
Canal Gut
Indian Creek
Coniott Creek (Town Swamp)
Frog Level Swamp
Concho Creek
Etheridge Swamp
Beaverdam Creek
fl.ill Branch
Sweetwater Creek (Statons
Pond)
Hardison Hill Creek
Long Creek
Srr.i thwick Creek
Ready Branch
Dog Branch
Conine Creek
Devils Gut
Gardners Creek
Deep Run Swamp
Lanier Swamp
Copper Swamp
ROANOKE RIVER
BroJd Creek
welch Creek
Conaby Creek
ALBEHARLE SOUND (Batchelor
Bay)
Eastmost River
Eastmost River
Cashie River
Wahtom s.-amp
Connaritsa Swamp
White Oak Swamp
Chlska Creek
Description
From source to Roanoke River
From source to Blue Hole Swamp
From source to Roanoke River
From source to Roanoke River
From source to Roanoke River
From source to Coniott Creek
From source to Roanoke River
From source to Concho Creek
From source to Concho Creek
From source to Concho Creek
From source to Roanoke River
From source to Statons Pond, Sweet-
water Creek
From source to Hardison Mill Creek
From source to Statons Pond, Sweet-
water Creek
From source to Statons Pond, Sweet-
water Creek
From source to Ready Branch
From source to Roanoke River
From source to Roanoke River
From source to Devils Gut
From source to Gardners Creek
Frcxn source to Gardners Creek
From source to Gardners Creek
From 18 mile marker at Jamesville to
Albemarle Sound (Batchelor Bay)
From source to Roanoke River
From source to Roanoke River
From source to Roanoke River
West of a line extending from a
point of land on the southside of the
mouth of Black Walnut Swamp in a
southerly direction to a point of
land on the eastside of the mouth
of Roanoke River
From Roanoke River to N.C. Hwy. 45
From N.C. Hwy. 45, including cutoff
between Eastmost River and Middle
River.to Albemarle Sound
From source to a point 1. 0 mile up-
stream from Bertie County SR 1500
From source to Cashie River
F rcxn source to Cashie River
From source to Cashie River
From source to Cashie River
15
Class
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C Sw
C Sw
C Sw
C Sw
B Sw
C Sw
B Sw
C Sw
C Sw
C Sw
C Sw
C Sw
Classification
Date Index No.
9/1/57
9/1/57
9/1/74
9/1/74
7/1/73
9/1/74
9/1/57
9/1/74
9/1/57
9/1/74
9/1/57
9/1/57
9/1/57
9/1/57
9/1/74
9/1/74
9/1/57
9/1/57
9/1/57
9/1/74
9/1/74
9/1/74
9/1/57
9/1/57
7/13/80
9/1/57
9/1/74
9/1/57
9/1/74
9/1/57
9/1/74
7/1/73
7/1/73
9/1/74
23-45
23-45-1
23-46
23-47
23-48
23-48-1
23-49
23-49-1
23-49-2
23-49-3
23-50
23-50-1
23-50-1-1
23-50-2
23-50-3
23-50-3-1
23-51
23-52
23-52-1
23-52-1-1
23-52-1-2
23-52-1-3
23-(53)
23-54
23-55
23-56
24
24-1-(1)
24-1-(2)
24-2-(1)
24-2-2
24-2-3
24-2-4
24-2-5 ·
2B .0300
REF.32
1
North Carolina Inland
Fishing, Hunting & Trapping
Effective Jui'( 1, l8:.:l4 :o Ju:1e 30, Ff)r:;
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
' LICENSE REQUIREMENTS AND INFORMATION ......... 4
FISHING REGULATIONS ............................................... 7
. Inland Game Fish .......................................................... 7
Warmwater Game Fish .................................................. 8
Mountain Trout ............. 9
Nongame Fish .............................. . .. 13
BOATING ACCESS REGULATIONS ............................ 17
HUNTING REGULATIONS ............................................ 19
Big Game .................................................................... 20
Small Game and Other Species .. : ............................... 24
Controlled Hunting Preserves.................. . ....... 24
Migratory Game Birds .................................................. 24
TRAPPING REGULATIONS ......................... . . .... , ...... 25
GAME LANDS REGULATIONS ..
LOCAL LAWS ...... .
Hun_ting and Trapping ............. .
Local Fox Laws ....................... .
. .. , ................. 26
····················· 28
···················· 28
···················· 32
BIG GAME TAG REPORT ............................................ 33
UNLAyVFUL HARASSMENT ......................................... 33
APPLICATION FORMS .................................................. 37
Swan Permit Application .............................................. 37
Small Game Hunts Application .................................... 37
Trapping Application .................................................... 37
Wildlife in North Carolina Magazine ............................ 38
Managed Either-Sex Deer Hunts ........ : ........................ 39
Permit Turkey Hunts Application ................................ 41
Permit Waterfowl Hunts Application ........................... 41
Wildlile Endowment Fund ........................................... 42
Hunting, Trapping and Fishing are North Carolina's oldest and most cherished traditions. The future of these
great outdoor sports depends on our wise and balanced management. We all must share in this responsibility.
NORTH CAROLINA
WILDLIFE CALENDAR
To order the Calendar, or reserve your calendar for next year,
please write: CALENDAR, NC Wildlile Resources Commis•
sion, Archdale Building, 512 N. Salisbury Street, Raleigh, NC
27604-1188; [phone].
EQUAL OPPORTUNITY
The Wildlife Resources Commission is an Equal Opportunity
Employer and all wildlile programs are administered lor the·
benefit of all North Carolina citizens without prejudice towards
age, sex, race, religion, or national origin. Violations of this
pledge may be reported to the Equal Employment Officer, Larry
A. Campbell, Personnel Olficer, NC Wildlife Resources Com-·
mission, 512 N. Salisbury Street, Raleigh, NC 27604-1188,
telephone (919) 733·2241 .
Cover photograph by Jim Dean of the North
Carolina Wildlile Resources Commission.
"The publication ol this digest was paid lor through the sale
of advertis(ng. The North Carolina Wildlile Resources Com-
mission neither endorses products or services listed nor
accepts any liability arising from the use of products· or
services listed."
Published by WJF Marketing, Inc., Lebanon, Oregon 97355.
For Advertising inlormation call Richard Meyers, Advertising
Sales Manager. Phone 503·259-2991.
State of North Carolina
James B. Hunt Jr., Governor
Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
NORTH CAROLINA
WILDLIFE RESOURCES COMMISSION
John F. Lentz, Chairman.: .................................. Ellerbe
Bobby N. Setzer, Vice Chairman ................... Cullawhee
Susan L. Allen ............. :. . ................ Cary
Richard P. Budd .. Winston-Salem
Ovide E. de St. Aubin .. . .............. Siler City
Junicr W. Dew. .. ...... Hallsboro
Lawrence "Larry" Diedrick ..... . ........ Rocky Mount
Russell M. Hull, Jr. .. Elizabeth City
Ted B. Lockerman ........... Clinton
John W. Parks Ill.. . ........... Gastonia
John E. Pechmann. . ...... Fayetteville
Roy Gerodd Sowers 111.......................... . ......... Burgaw
Jerry W. Wright.... . .......... Jarvisburg
Charles R. Fullwood, Executive Director
Raleigh
FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION, CONTACT:
North Carolina Wildlile Resources Commission
512 N. Salisbury Street
Raleigh, NC 27604-1188
For motorboat registration call
1-(919)-662-4373
For license information call
1-(919)-662-4370
550,000 copies ol this public document were printed at
a cost of $48,519 or $0.08 per copy.
gill nets in the Northeast Cape Fear River and Long Creek; with dip and bow nets in Slack River: and with seines in the main run of North-east Cape Fear River.
December I-May I with gill nets in Black River: and with dip, bow. and gill nets in Moore's Creek approximately one mile upstream to New /.toon Fishing Camp.
Perquimans: July 1-June 30 with traps in all inland waters.
December 1-June 5with dip and bow nets in all inland public waters. excluding public lakes, ponds, and other impounded waters: and wuh gill nets in all inland public waters.
Person: July I-August 31 with seines in Hyco Creek and Mayo Creek.
July 1 -June 30 with gigs in all public waters. · Pitt: July t .June 30with traps in Neuse River and in Tar River below the mouth of Hardee Creek east of Greenville.
December I-June 5 with dip, bow, and drift gill nets and with seines in Tar River; and with dip, bow, and gill nets in al! other inland public waters, except Grindle Creek, and Contentnea Creek berween NC 118 bridge at Grifton and the Neuse River.
Polk: July f.June 30with gigs in all public waters, except designated public mountain trout waters. Randolph: December 1 -March 1 with gill nets in Deep River and Uwharrie River. . July I-August 31 with seines ·1n Deep River above the Coleridge Dam and in Uwharrie River. July (-June 30with gigs in all public waters. Richmond: July I-August 31 with seines in all running public waters. except Pee Dee River from Blewett Falls Dam downstream to the Seaboard Coastline Railroad trestle. July f ·June 30 with traps and gigs in all public waters, except fakes located on the Sandhills Game land.
December 1 • June 5 with dip and OOw nets in Pee Dee River below Blewett Falls Dam; and with gill nets in Pee Dee River below the mouth
of Canledges Creek.
Robeson: December I-March 1 with giH nets and gigs in all inland public waters.
Rockingham: July 1-August 31 with seines in Dan River and Haw Rivar. July I-June 30with traps in Dan River; and with gigs in all public waters.
Rowan: July 1-AuguSt 31 with seines in all run-ning public waters.
July 1. June 30with traps and gigs in aU public waters.
Rutherford: July 1-Augusr 31 with seines in all running public waters, except designated public mountain trout waters.
July I.June 30with traps, gigs, and spear guns. in all publ'1c waters. except designated public mountain trout waters.
Samp.::ion: December I-March 1 with gill nets in all inland public waters.
December 1-May 1 with gill nets in Big Coharrie Creek, Black River, and Six Runs Creek. May 2.June 5 with gill nets of no less than 5½-inch stretch ·measure in Big Coharrie Creek, Black River, and Six Runs Creek. December 1.June5with dip and bow nets in Big Coharrie Creek, Black. River, and Six Runs Creek.
Scotland: December I-March 1 with gill nets in all inland public waters except lakes located on the Sandhills Game land.
Stanly: July 1-August 31 with seines in al! runriing public waters, except Pee Dee River between Tillery Dam and Rocky River. July 1-June 30 with traps and gigs in all public waters.
Stokes: July I .June 30 with traps and gigs in all public waters, except designated public moun-tain trout wators; and traps may not be used in Belews Creek Reservoir.
Surry: July I-June 30 'Mth gigs in all public waters, except designated p.;blic mountain trout waters; and with traps in the main stem of Yadkin River.
Below is a listing of current fish consumption advisories tor North Carolina waters: Body of Water Advisory Pol\utaot Hyco lake and All Fish. No consumpbon by women· of child boaring age. Selenium Be!ews Lake No more than 4-6 ounces per week tor the general
Albemarle Sound
(from Bull Bay to
Harvey Point west
to mouth of Roanoke
and Chowan fr,ers)
Roanoke River
(Hwy 17 in William-
ston to the mouth
of Albemarle Sound)
Chowon River
(entire river in ,·~CJ
Welch Creak
(Martin Co.}
Pigeon River
Pages lake, Pit
Links and Watsan
lake (Moore Co.)
8"19 Creek
(Columbus Co.)
Waccamaw Rlvr:r
\Columbus ano
(Brun~wicl-. cos.;
16
population.
All fish except herring, shad and shelf fish. No cons-umption by pregnant women, nursing women and children. No more tha~ two meals por month for general population.
All lfsh except, herring, .::ihad and shellfish. No cons-umption by pregnant women, nursing women and children. No more than two meals per month for general population.
All fish except, herring, shad and .::ihellfish. No cons-umption by pregnant women, nursing women and children. No more than tv-to meals per month for genera! population.
Al! fish except, herring, shad and :.hellflsh. No cons-umption.
All fish. No consumption
Largemouth bass. No consumption by women of child-bearing age and children. No more than two meals per month lor the general population.
Largemouth bass end bowfln (blackfl.::ih). No cons• umption by women of childbearing age and children.
No more than two f"l'"ll:!.:ils per month for the goneral popul;ition.
Dioxins
Dioxins
Dioxins
Dioxins
Dioxins
Mercury
Mercury
Swain: July I-June 30 with gigs in a/I public waters, except designa led public mountain lrou{ waters.
Transylvan!a: July I-June 30 with gigs in all public waters. except designated public moun-tain trout waters.
Tyrrell: July I-June 30with traps in Scuppernong River and Alligator Creek.
December 1-June Swith dip and bow nets in a!I inland public waters, excluding impounded pub-lic waters and Bee Tree Canal within 50 yards of the lake Phelps fish ladder.
December I-June 5·with gill nets in Alligator
Creek.
Union: July I -August 31 with seines in all running public waters.
July I-June 30 with ll'aps and gigs in all public waters.
Vance: December I-March 1 with gill nets in Southerlands Pond and Ellis Pond.
July 1-Augus/ 31 with seines in the Tar River. July 1 .June 30 with gigs in all public waters, except Rolands. Faulk.ners, Southerlands, and Weldon ponds, City lake, and Kerr Reservoir. July I .June 30 with dip nets ln Kerr Reservoir. July I .June 30withcast nets in all public waters. Wake: July I-June 30 with gigs in all public waters, except Sunset, Benson. Wheeler, Ra-leigh, and Johnson Jakes.
December I •June 5with dip and bow nets in the Neuse River below Mi!burnie Dam, and Swift Creek below Lake Benson Dam.
Warren: July I-August 3T with seines in Fishing Creek, Shocco Creek, and Walker Creek: ex-cluding Duck and Hammes Mill ponds. July I-June 30 with gigs in all public waters, except Duck and Hammes Mill ponds, Kerr Reservoir, and Gaston Reservoir.
July 1-June 30 with dip nets in Kerr Reservoir and Gaston Reservoir.
July I-June JO with cast nets in all public waters. Washington: December 1-June 5 with dip and bow nets in all inland public ',Yaters, excluding impounded public waters; and with gill nets in Conaby Creek.
Wayne: December 1·March 1 with gill nets in Sasser's Mill Pond and Sleepy Creek Lake. December f-June 5 with dip and bow nets in Unle River. Mill Creek, and Neu so River, except from Quaker Nee~. Dam downstream to SR 1008 (Tolar) bridge.
Wilkes: July 1-June 30 with traps in Yadkin River below W. Kerr Seen Reservoir; and with gigs and spear guns in a!I public waters, except designated public mountain trout wa!ers. WIison: July I-June 30 with gigs in Contcntnea Creek (except Buckhorn Reservoir), including unnamed tributaries between Flowers Mill and SR 1163 (Deans) bridge.
December I-June 5 with dip and bow nets in Contentnea Creek below US 301 bridge and in Toisnot Swamp downstream from the La',,;,e T oisnot Dam.
January I-March 1 with gill nets in Silver lake. Yadkin: July I-June 30 with gigs in all public waters; and with traps in tho m;;iin stem of Yadkin River. . Tu~~~!ifi~&·~wws e-~~ J~M ... · ... ~=,,=-~-"~ . ·'s:i t~!N1?€> R ~~iJHJ~.~ .. ,""-.•,t
POSSESSION OF CERTAIN FISHES It is unlawful to :r:;r,'.3D')rt, purchase. pos5GSS, or sell nny species ol p11~nhn, !hrJ "walking cat1ish· (Clnrias b.1lrachu:;;_ ":of 1h,:: ·11hi1n :1mur or ·grass
REF. 33
Cl
Cl
1990 Update
Fish Tissue Dioxin Levels in North Carolina
North Carolina Division of Environmental Management
Water Quality Section
1!1fi
f~i.:-~· : -ir.-
t 'fr'"• ~i¾·,, li:~~·~t· I~,,,,..,. "···.:-
i\t,i-'
.:i,'~, Introduction
1990 Update
Fish Tissue Dioxin Levels in North Carolina
l ti.::'1;:.
I i; Dioxin has accumulated in fish found in the receiving waters of pulp and paper
\J •• -t~ • 1'fi;''~ facility effluents. Elevated levels of dioxin found in fish during 1989 sampling
I~~f~-prompt:d the Sta~e Health 1:)irector to issue ~everal fish co~sumption advis?ri~s
i -;~;,~ (listed m Appendix C). This report summarizes the analytical results of dioxin
i",{: measured in fish tissue with emphasis on results from 1990 collections. All
~:; available data, whether collected by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA),
li-z7-· the Division of Environmental Management (DEM), or the pulp and paper
,~;, industry, are inclu~ed in Appendix A. The ~~"". informa~ion ~resented within this
~:; :· summary report will be evaluated by the Divis10n of Ep1dem10logy and the State
I:;~'. Health Director. This evaluation will determine if dioxin fish consumption
~~-' advisories for the recreational and commercial harvest of fish require modification.
·1 The Division of Marine Fisheries and the Wildlife Resources Commission will
le·· likely receive recommendations from the State Health Director based on this risk
. assessment evaluation. The Wildlife Resources Commission and the Division of
I•·•:' · Marine Fisheries are responsible for regulatory and fisheries management decisions
·. on consumption advisories.
.-.·,J:
I.;..,..,.
~~ -=~ ,~:~
I-·~:.:
~~-,i,-.
••'-.
I'"\_:-~:..:·:·
-<; •• , .. r·.
1-.;.;_,, :~· t:·
i"•F·:
..,.;.
f-~-..
i-i:/·
~--,.
:;.!""-• -::·
...... ·•.· . ......
'
·,,-
-~-~
i~-· , ...
_,
Background information on dioxin contamination and the facilities required to test
fish tissue are included. Also included is a brief summary of past work and the
rationale for testing in 1990. Site selection, species tested, and analytical methods
were chosen after careful consideration of data needs and lengthy discussions with
the Division of Epidemiology, Division of Marine Fisheries, and the Wildlife
Resources Commission. The 1990 spatial extent of sampling varied tremel\dously
due to the location of pulp and paper facilities and the nature of the receiving
waters.
Background
Polychlorinated dibenzofurans (PCDF's) and polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins
(PCDD's) are two groups of compounds composed of 135 and 75 individual
isomers respectively. Some of these isomers are toxic at extremely low levels,
particularly those with chlorine substitutes in the 2,3,7,8 positions. This collective
group of 210 individual isomers is commonly refered to as dioxin. The formation
of 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) and 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzofuran
:. (TCDF) in the bleaching of certain pulp material and the discharge of TCDD and
TCDF from pulp and paper mills has been well documented.·
: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) initiated nationwide studies to
determine if fish tissue had been contaminated by dioxins and furans. Results of
these studies in North Carolina revealed dioxin fish con.tamination near pulp and
paper facilities that used a bleaching process. Under the authority of Section 308 of
the Clean Water Act, administration of surface water discharge permits (NPDES)
and North Carolina General Statutes §143-215.3, the Division of Environmental
Management required pulp and paper facilities to assess dioxin contamination in
fish and/ or shellfish tissue in effluent receiving streams. ·
-
" I
i'
I
i I
I I,
I.
\I
' I I
f
I
'
1·
I
I
:~ I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I I·; .
I
' ; ~-
The following is a list of pulp and paper facilities discharging to North Carolina
surface waters (Locations shown in Figure 1) :
Facilitv
Champion Paper
Weyerhaeuser
Weyerhaeuser
Ecusta, P.H. Glatfelter
Alpha Cellulose
Federal Paperboard
Union Camp
Location
Canton
Plymouth
New Bern
Asheville
Lumberton
Riegel wood
Virginia
Receiving: System
Pigeon River
Roanoke River
Neuse River
French Broad River
Lumber River
Cape Fear River
Chowan River
Given concern by the public, industry, and government agencies, this summary is
intended to provide new individual fish tissue monitoring data from the above
facilities and from agency monitoring activities. It is further intended to
composite all fish tissue information on dioxin into one summary document
available to all interested parties. Summarized results of all dioxin fish tissue
monitoring in North Carolina performed by industry, DEM and EPA are included
in Appendix A. Laboratory support for these results was made available by EPA,
the Albemarle Pamlico Estuarine Study (APES), and by individual pulp and p';Per
industries. · ·
Figure 1. Pulp and Paper Facilities in North Carolina
ALPHA CELLULOSE
FEDERAL P.APER EOARD
. ~~
. ,;..';J -·;1r
,-I~ jj -.;1:f.J .. ti
Historical Studies and the 1990 Approach :,ll'.j'~
Dioxin in fish tissue was first sampled by DEM in 1984 as part of the National .:.:_~
Dioxin Study. Sample locations were selected as background sites to determine if ~~1~0
• ·
2,3,7,8-TCDD ~as ubi~uitous in t~e aquatic envi~o.nmen~. In the spring of 1987, ,,:-~"~ ..
under the Nat10nal B10accumulat10n Study, additional isomers were evaluated. :-"Ajf. ·
Site selection included three contaminated sites and one background site. All four 'i<i~Jfiii
sites had detectable levels of dioxin. These results revealed concerns for fish tissue :~tl ,
contamination below pulp and paper facilities using a bleaching process in North /.:.'r:!i.f~.1
Carolina. To further investigate this issue, fish tissue samples were collected ~f~-1/·~
be_low fiv~ pulp and paper mills during the winter of 19871_88 _and below two o~er ~Ji:i~-·
mills durmg the summer of 1988. Detectable le_vels of d1oxm were found at all ;:ci!o''
seven locations. Additional sampling oc~urred m 1989 as part of the Albe~a~le if;{f:~
Pamlico Estuarine Study (APES). These sites also had detectable levels of d10xm.~{t,·· . ·
. ;:=tf
,I .i '--. . ,rl4
'
____ .,,_,.,
... rrt::-
~t~·,.::~--•'
I -~;";.,. ' y•"::-·~ •'
As a result of this information and the needs of the Division of Epidemiology to evaluate public health concerns, bleached pulp and paper industries were required to perform assessments of fish tissue in effluent receiving streams in 1990. Concurrent with this effort by industry, the Division of Environmental . Management, assisted by the Division of Marine Fisheries and the Wildlife :tL.:.:: ':j"• -• I ••
"f""_v.i-·{' . •:'
Resources Commission, conducted additional evaluations to determine the spatial ··extent of dioxin contamination in fish tissue. .-:,,:..
.f:, Based on the information obtained from 1984 through 1989, the Division of r Environmental Management elected to focus 1990 fish tissue monitoring efforts ·,--ac--on 2,3,7,8-TCDD and 2,3,7,8-TCDF. This decision was based on the composition of .. ,,___ dioxin isomers encountered in previous sampling and the toxicity eqilivalency ·/ ~i-~-----. factor (TEQ) rating of these isomers. The TEQ value is calculated assuming ·· ~:l•--: . additivity of effects from individual cogeners of dioxins and furans and is ~··• · expressed as an "equivalent amount of 2,3,7,8-TCDD." The basis for this approach ·---· is to aid in the assessment of the human health risks posed by mixtures of dioxins and furans since the bulk of toxicological research has been performed on the ; ;: · · TCDD cogener. Thus, by combining the TEQ approach with the toxicology •'· ."---information available on TCDD, the risks associated with consumption of a -~ ;:.: ..... mixture of dioxins and furans in fish tissue can be estimated. Dioxin cogener ! information obtained from 1984 through 1989 indicated, that on the average, i :;.f·•: _____ TCDD and TCDF laboratory analysis provided greater than 90% of the dioxin ' F.: information necessary to calculate the total toxicity equivalency value (TEQ)l. The :"[f]; -90% return of information and cost efficiency in analyses suggested benefits in
i ,;~J::,i, performing 2,3,7,8-TCDD and 2,3,7,8-TCDF analysis only. Laboratory identification '\k ·: of additional isomers is quite expensive and provides little additional ~c/t-~ information. Therefore, the new information available within this summary 1''.',rLT. reflects the most cost effective and timely acquisition of dioxin data from all i..L. . ;:ti·;:· . available sources by _focusing measurements on 2,3,7,8-T~J:?1? and 2,3?,~-TCDF. !lr.~:... Furthermore, composite samples were analyzed, thus max1m1zmg the eff1aency of ·/,.:.-~; la,9oratory costs and providing information from a large number of fish . .: ! c.,.' i-·;_;;-t· . rrr~ i ., t:.:~~ . ·rr·· :·' j!,;:~ .. '· ,,...:...... . r ~~ .
) .............
·I •I . r-:-· tr--:7""·
t4Jt;~.
-· . ,, . . -: .
!T?-;-. f-,•--··-... ·;{£~-
't .... --: '
·-". ;-·~-----~ --
1---·-lNorth Carolina Division of Environmental Management, Water Quality Section. (1990) Fish Tissue Dioxin Levels in North Carolina.
3
33
Summary at Individual Dio~in Fish Ta.sue Samples
2.67
:711 ''ji ·s Wal::n Cr at old Wevert,nu5Gr discharnca Mav 2'3·June 5. 1990 Pumol<.inseed till,1111 86 ,.s· 3.8 7.8
P 11 s wc.i:n Cr at old w, .... muuser dischar0et June S·Seot 27. 1990 White Carlish lillel/5 362 s.,· 6.1 2.7
~ r, s Welch C1 at old w,.,.muus.er d.scharov June S•Seot 27. 1990 Whne Cat!~h tille\/5 362 6.5"/duol 6.2 3.4
..:...., 'tt s Welch Cr at old Weverhaeuser discharoa S•Jun-90 Whi11 Catfish lille\/1 2213 5.5" 5.3 1.11
f-AR0Jr:ok,Ri ..... 1•tPlvmouth 10111190 B!ueCral:I meat/18 e.o· 3.1 29
~ lo A Roanoke River nur Weyerhaeuser discharge 12120188 Laro-mouth Bus lill11l5 1387 23.2 17,612 55.~
,f 1o •S Roanoi<.1 River near Wevertluuur discharc:a AnrillMav 1989 White Cat!ish Fillel/8 125 28.2 21.507 • 36.835
~ lo s RoJnoke River near Weverhaeuser discharoe Aoril/M ■

v

1989 Blueoill Fillet/• 128 18.5 17.981 •.529
::-10 S Rolf\(ll';e River roe■r Woverhaausor disehame AQ11llM1" 1989 Bluenilt Fillel/8 57 18.2 17.329 a.20,
"ti s w1t:h Cr 11 old Wovemaeuser discnaroe 23-Mav-90 Laroemouth Bass lille!/4 3'-8 5.0" 4..6 3.5
2. 18
2.46
3.54
1.85
t I :~ ! :::~:: ::::; ::; ::::::~::; ::;~:;: :::::;~:; ~::: ~~1:w c:e~:: ~:::::;: 1
5
1~ 1\ !:;:! ;::~;;
-tO S Roanoi<.e River near Weverhaeusor diseharoe _..,.ril/Ma" 1989 Gizzard Shad Whole/2 273 -0.5 t0 0.773
.:_ ~ ~ ;:::;-ddla Ri,,er al NC 4.5 5/2189 Laraemouth Bass lille113 4.33 9,5 9.1 3.2
~ 11 A ri\1(.ldle Aiver at NC •5 512189 Channel Catlish tillot/3 1620 9•.2 77.7 1'7
.~ 12 A Albomarle Snd@ Terragin Pt 512/89 Lar mouth Bass !illet/3 924. 8.1 7.107 9.687
1_ I 13 S Roanoke Rivor at Marker 15 Alldl/Mav 1989 White Catfish Fille\/6 370 U.6 11.981 19.068
+-13 S Roanoke River at Markor 15 Aoril/Mav 1989 White Catlish Fillet/6 370 1'.1/duoJ 11.394 19.11
:.!_ fl S Roanoko River at Marker 15 April/May 1989 White Catfish Fillet/4 203 18.9 12.177 29.945 ·•· .._
"!j.. 13 S Roanoke River at Marker 15 AorillMav 1989 Bluellill Fillet/7 4.2 16.9 1".799 20.531
:!._ l-,c,'-r.s;-1:Rs,:',::oo::c,,:-cac;,:,::,-:,::,-;M;,::,c,,:',c,;15;-----------t-
-
,
;
,
:
'
:
,
'
s
;
,
c
,
M
'
;
,
:
c
.
,
:
:
-
,
c
,
c
,
o
,
'
-
f
o
a
'
c
,
,
:
'
,
'
-
:
:
:
Q
;
C
1
1
-
-
-
-
-
t
-
a
,
s
;
,
;
:
,
,
;
;
,
'
;
,
;
,
-
-
t
-
-
-
-
,
,
'
a
,
'
-
-
t
-
-
-
-
'
-
;
,
'
-
'
-
-
-
t
-
-
-
;
,
;
'
.
~
,
,
.
,
,
'
-
-
t
-
'
;
,
;
-
,
;
'
,
;
'
,
;
-
-
t
-
-
-
l

+-13 S Roanoke River at Marker 15 Anril/May 1989 Black Crappie Fillet/4 92 21 19."45 14.563 j ,•,.f
;.:_ 13 S Roanoke River at Marker 15 Aoril/Mav 1989 Blaci<. Craonie Fillet!'-233 27.6 25.135 24..668 !.
13 s Ro,oo'-a,,.," M"'" 15 Ao<11/Ma, \989 Bl•" C,ao,;, F;11,.,, 233 36.9/deo\ 3',1'7 27.•2' I
•\ 13 S Roanoke River at Marker 15 Aoril/Mav 1989 Yo!\ow Porch Filletl:l 54 16.3 10.289 59.015
:: I 63 S Rolnoke Rivor at Marker 15 10/2/89 Blueoill Fillet/7 86.7 20.8" 16.6 42 ••·
13 S Roanoko River at Marker 15 Sept 27.29.1989 Black Craooie Fillet/4 140 ,.8· 3.6 11.8 '.i;~
63 S Roanoke River at Marker 15 Sent 27.29.0ct4 1989 Channel Catlish Fil\o\/3 538 43. 7" "1.2 24.6 · f!
., s ""~"• a;,.,"""'" ,s s,,. 1'-13, ,,.o a1,c1, c~oo• 1;11.,,s m u· o.a, ,.s 2.ss I
, 63 S Roanoke River al Marker 15 Sept 11-13. 1990 Channel Cat1ish lil!1115 14.09 26.4" 26 3.8 2.56 ..
·.~ 63 S Roanoko River at Markar 15 Soot 11-12, 1990 Laro.mouth Bass tillet/B 361 2.'-" 1.7 6.9 2.16
_;_ 63 S RoanokoRiveratMarket15 Soot 11-12, 1990 LaroemouthBass lillot/8 361 1.9"(duo! 1.5 '-'i:;··r,•
.=.,_': I :: ,
S Ro:lnoke River at Marker 15 Sent 11·13. 1990 Whito Catlish liltet/5 396 8.0· 8 NDtO.U\ •2.66 ,
,t-"--+",'·+RoJnoke River at Sans Souci 5/2/89 Lar011mouth Bass 1illet/1 675 10.8 10.326 4..192 I:~ ;
"-:=•~·~=t=•~~~a:00r00~1-1,Ja;;,~.~·=•r•J 5~•~01•J•~0~,~,t; ================1:::::1,'.:12t10•t•t=====~'~"~'" ~ ... ~mj,~,j'"::;a~.~ .. ~==t=:I1t11t1ot,t,:;,::j::t,~•2°::t::::j,~,j.,t::::1:::j,j,~ .• t~==t:::'.),t,t~::1:::::j
-64 A Rolnoke River at Sans Souci 512189 Redoar l!llot/2 4.50 6.7 B.l 6.6
-54 A ReJnok11Rivera1SansSouei 12/20/86 LaroomouthBass lillot/5 530 29 27.112 19.299 '•).~
.:::::;,. I t-'c'~+-'A'-+=R•"cOO.cc,'•'c"c;, ••• ,c•o•cS.c"',"'"s","""'"; --------+---c'""''"'"''---1''"""'" ="m"'"""'"'-" .. "''''--+-"' 'c'c"c'c'.,'-+-"'"'"'-1----''"'"· ''----+--',""'"'"''--+-"'•·•"•''---+---l ; ~~:
ii"' 65 A Roanoke River at Moutn 512189 La1~mouth Bass fillot/1 1008 9.1 8.709 3.171
64 A RoJnoka River at Sans Souci 512189 Laroemouth Basa li!let/5 34.2 24 23.8 2.3 .1,.··iD·. ,•,
-65 A Ao~noke River at Mouth 512/69 Whrt1 Best lillet11 575 0.9 EMPC(1.3) 8.2
-65 A Roanoke River at Mouth 5/2189 Laroemouth Bass lillot/1 850 10.7 9.4. 12
-=lrc';;'c-r''-f"=--"'"00=c;'c'c"c;'c'c'c'o'c"c'"""""-----------+---"'"""-'"'"''---ll''"""'~=•mcP
o
"
c
"
:
_
,
;
a
,
e
,
c
•
c
_
-
t
-
c
'
;
c
1c1•c•c1c'-+-'-'"'"'-1----''"'"''---+--'-""'''"'--+-"'"·s"c''---+----1 ~''
65 A Rc3noke River at Mouth 512/69 Lar011mou1h Bass lillot/6 420 12.0 11.7 2.7 ... ,;!
66 S Casr.ie River 11 Windsor SeD! 19-20, 1990 Blaci<. Crao::,ie tillet/2 310 o· ND(0.161 N0(0.25) 3.'-3
-66 S Casnie River at Wind50r Oct 6-7, 1990 Channel Catt1sh lille\/2 2592 1.6" 1.6 ND(0.26l 3.42
-66 S Casnie Ri~er at Windsor Sect 20•0ct 7. 1990 Laroemouth Bass lill11119 726.5 o • ND(0.041 0.08 4.43 ~1:a::,,',·
11 S6 S Casnoe River at Windsor Sept 19-0ct 7. 1990 Yellow Bullhead fillot/6 ~93 o· ND!0.05l ND!0.251 2.53 fj1
.:=J,, ,: .. ~ •,:,' S C3sr.ie R;ver a! San Souci Ferrv 19·Seo•90 Channel C;i:1isn 1illet11 5033 o· ND(0.321 ND(0.74l J.e6 ■-.
S C.:sr.1e River at San Souci Ferrv Sept 19·20, 1990 Channel CJ111sn lillet/10 2004 1.4• 1.4 N0(0.451 5.05
-; 67 S CJi~,e River at San Souci Ferrv 16-Seo-90 La1Q11mouth Bas, tillet/11 366 O • N0/0.41/ ND(0.59) 2.66
· ,--:,a,c-t-'s'-+c"",.",",ie'-"s";,",",",","s",","s",",",";",".,",~'-------
-
+
~
s
-
,
-
,
"
,
"
,
"
,
"
.
,
"
a
"
,
=
.
,
-
,
-
,
-
1
!
'
,
"
.
,
"
"
o
,
,
"
m
"
,
'
,
"
.
,
'
"
'
a
"
.
,
'
,
'
-
-
+
~
"
,
;
"
1
"
1
,
"
,
"
,
"
,
'
-
+
-
,
"
,
'
,
'
,
-
l
-
-
-
-
'
,
'
-
.
-
-
-
+
-
N
"
°
'
o
"
1
,
o
"
.
2
"
,
,
"
-
+
-
'
N
"
o
"
,
"
a
"
,
"
,
"
,
-
+
~
c
,
o
,
-
-
i

~:·
-, ·=j•~•L=tj5t!Atl~bio~m~a~•"~j5o~~"~"'~j•~•jM~•~'f'~"ti'::::::::::::::::t:]
5~'~'t' j'j'~''b't':'t•~•~'[j~C~h~•~'°~•~IJCt•~•ilifis~ht:::t:j'±;'ti'~'f"d'd't:
j
:
=
•
Q
•
~
•
~
•
t
:
t
:
:
I
~
•
~
•
=
·
~
'
~
•
~
l
=
=
±
=
=
=
]
1
'
=
'
L
:
:
:
t
:
:
:
j
'
j
·
'
t
:
:
:
t
:
~
'
;
·
'
~
'
=
~

,f'&i
IS
= ; 6
6
8
8
S Al!:J~marle Sound at Marker 1 Seo1 11-13, 1990 Channel Catlish lillet/10 1656 21.5"!duc\ 21.1 4.3 I"
-;';--tc5~oA1ebs•cme•"'"'-'So,ee"e""e..,•e•c•c•e•!••e•ec.'---------t-~Se•e"'-''>'c·>cJ,,_c
<
9~9~0'-i~Cche•e0°C•e1cCs•c•fl;eshc__!-_cl;"lel•c•e1•7_+.-'c5C2e9c..,!---'C0c·c'~·---t--09c•c7 __ !-_03C8'--f-,3c'~',1
-·~•c•c..+sS..i,Ae,lb!marle Sound at Marker 1 Seot 11·13, 1990 Lar011mouth Bau li\le\/3 367 1.8" 1.2 6.'-3."9
-68 S Alb11marle Sound ,t Matker 1 5101 12-21, 1990 Whrto P•rch !ille!/12 154 7.9" 5.1 28 2.a, -:J:;.':
-= I GS I S Blackwater R, 15 mi UPS Union Camp dischar~• Sect/Oct 1989 Larnamouth Bass Fillet O • NDI0.91 0.21 :Jr•
69 s B~:kWl!lf R. 100 15 mi UPS Union Camo discham• Aue/Sept 1989 B\uea1II F;llet O. N0(0.7l 0.29 11·~
; 69 S Bl3ckwattf R, 1op 15 mi UPS Union Came disct,arn• Aun 18•25 1989 Ch1nn1I Catlisn Fillet 2.3" 2.3 N0{0.1el ~•
-1 6S S g1:i:kwa1er R, a.,o 15 mi UPS Union Camo discna1 March 8·13.1990 Lar011mouth Sus Fille1 o• ND{0.5) ND(0.3) ,
-1 69 S Blackw1t11r R, aoo 15 mi UPS Union Camp dis.enar"• March 8·13.1990 Blueoill Fillet O • ND!0.191 ND(O.tll
-= I ~9 S Blackwater R 100 15 mi UPS Union Camo discharn• 2113190 Channel Catlish Fillet ,.o· 3.9 1.33 ,..,.
~' ~·~•;_+~·-M•~1,~,,,.,.~·••c'~"'-'"'£"i!J'~'Jm,!'..; gu~P~SJU,!a~;~o,~C::•~m~p~d~;~£"!'!!"~'---'e'c'G'~'~•~''--.
.
J
!
C
~
h
~
•
~
'
~
"
!
'
L
.
f
C
'
;
•
~
"
~
"
!
!
h
_ _j_~w~"'~'·'--:I---..J.--l'c•!':· __ .J.._-2.0J.8l__,l.-_~o~.2~J'--t,, .. ,..-i.
c' ~·~•;_,1..•e.j~•~"c'!'••·~•!•c• B"!2'£"i!J'2'Jm,!'..; ~UfP§SJU,!a~;p~a~C::•~m~p~d~;~~"'!'!!'"i''!i--...c'!'c'Ll'~'~•~
o
,
_
_ _/JB~l~"'~'~·~"'~":'c•~rr~•e"L-l--'D~,a~wcac__Ji----l.--J•~•:· __ .J.. _ _!•J.2'---1--~'!;'~'--t-;~H .
-I'
....
'-''c''--+-·~~•~1,~,1••··~'!'C' B"c· ;,pgpg_J>2SJm~; U~P§S_!U,!a~;,~,~C::•~m~•~'·~•£'"!'!!'"'9!l---'!'~'Ll'~'~·~''--..
J
!
"
~
'
"
~
•
~
b
~
•
~
"
'
~
"
:
'
c
•
~
r
r
~
;
~
,
,
L
_
j
_
.
.
;
'
W
~
t
,
,
~
l
•
;
_
_
J
l
-
-
-
-
l
.
-
-
J
'
c
!
'
:
·

__ .J.. _ _!,J.8l__.(.._:;c,::;---t-~~1
-L'_,~o;_+~~'E'!:~!'..~~Lle'!'~~~~~:.!'!~£!~~!.../--~•~•~c~t---J!•~"
~
'
'
~
!
~
t
-
-
-
-
.
J
.
.
-
~
i
·
1~1!''--II---..J.--~'c.e:· __ .J.. __ .!.l''---l---,,~~~b;;--!--::Jl1.t_ ','
1 S Blackwater A. aDP 5 mi UPS Union Camp di$Charoe ~
·4 ~I
: lr1 .:t;i:::t1!tt:i:~:l:~,:~:~:1::~:i:1~:~·~0000ij~:;_"~:ii:i~~:~:tt~~;Tu;:~;jc"0l:::~"'~,~J..':~::c~,1:~:~:~:•~'--ir_-:_-_-J~~!:~,~bt:1:1:~::::i'~
l
.
~
·
~
:
~
•
c
;
!
~
s
i
h
h
'
_
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
1
t
:
:
]
,0'J;~:~:~:~::::i::::::i:::},j,,~'.i,~.~;~,;j_,:::t:::2;t•!:,-:_-_-~_-_~N
~
N
~
~
t
,
'
~
i
•
*
;
r
:
~
·
,
:
:
.
i
t
:
:
:
:
j
J
I
~

-\
1l:?'i"~--"f_~•t1-~•~'';;'f"~•f•~•..:•~•~~"~·1•~=~1 5J~mf[;tu~P~sJ~uf'f;~o~,~~Ct•7imt't1•~•~•~c~h~•~•~"~•~t::
-
-
:
1
'
~
'
!
'
~
'
~
'
J
2t·.!.';j'f'l'j'~•f9i:"::-~gc~~h~•7i'~'~'~'r~c1~~•~;~,~h~::i:~JF~;~,~'!•i•c'~'t:1t::::::
i
:
:
:
,
:
1
'
~
·
1
'
~
-
E
.
L
:
:
i
:
:
:
:
i
'
j
·
'
t
-
:
_
:
:
i
:
:
:
j
'
~
'
~
'
t
:
:
1
:
:
:
;
;
~

~ if-
7
7
0
0 S Bl~ckwa1er R app 5 mi UPS Union Camp d1scharo11 Mav 2·12.19S9 Channel Catfo1h Fillet/3 1,5·tducl 1.5 0.35 ''.= 1'!'1
S BIJCkwa1erR aoo5miUPSUnionCampdischarce Mav 2·12.19S9 Channel Cattish Whole/Como 1 '-" 1.'-o.39 •-1:!r
I ·L 70 IS Bl:1:,,,.,a111 R aoo 5 mi UPS Union Camo discharne May 2·12.1989 Channel CJ\\i~~ Whol11Comn 1.6" 1.6 0.'-6 ,'
:~ /I~,~ .\!-~s -
---~~~
ffl
. I
lj s. Industry Monitored, A-Agency ND-non-detected EMPC-Estimated Maximum Po1ential Concentra1ion
.. .a...w
-~·.tf •
,~(Roanoke River System
ltilsampling locations are shown in Figures 2 and 5)
l,~;.~~ish s~mples were collected to evaluate the extent of known dioxin contamination
Wi!~of the Roanoke River System above and below the discharge of the Weyerhaeuser l j!1, facility at Plymouth. Fish fillet analyses in 1990 evaluated 222 total individuals
~~/,! yielding 33 composites (Table 8). None of the locations sampled in 1990 above
l(!i,~1.w __ illiamston, N.C. had average dioxin concentrations above 3 ppt expressed as
a;;eiTEQ . Williamston, N.C. had been previously selected by the State Health .I~ Director as the upper bound for a dioxin fish consumption advisory on the
f~~Roanoke River. In 1990, fish fillets in Welch Creek and the Roanoke River near
,~~-the Weyerhaeuser discharge continued to have elevated dioxin concentrations .
. ,Jt•;ii):,, The maximum TEQ value observed in 1990 from the Roanoke system was found l~-;t:; in a composite sample of five channel catfish averaging 1409 grams in weight. s;':T-This maximum value was 26.4 ppt expressed as TEQ. In general, 1990 dioxin
11,~i information from the Roanoke system suggests lower fillet values when
;.g;';_ compared to data collected prior to 1990 (Table 9). Explanations for this change
_..4,.,:;' would be consistent with the possibilities mentioned in the Neuse River.
l'jJL: Samples collected from the Roanoke River at Weldon (Hatch) in 1988 were made
~7available for testing by staff of the Wildlife Resources Commission as a result of {f-J · fish hatchery activities on striped bass. The exact origin of these samples was not
11¥~• determined.
~I • ~J•:·" Table 8. Roanoke River System Dioxin Fish Fillet Summary For 1990 ?.~~r• ,,~-.;,·!l:1:-•{i.. Station Fish FiUet Sampled in 1990
li\11
~(... Location Station Location Avg Num Num Num % obs
~(,;,-Number TE hi Obs S ecies ;, 3 TE ~~JY7 .-"'-"5"'2"""'-R-o_an_o_ke-Ri--v-er_a_t W-el_d_on_(_H_a_tc_h)-----'--"""---~!!!!..---"'>,a,._--"l.:="'------"--=--'"""~
I~,-._:;;:. ;! ~~:~~: ~:::~~:~~on ~:: !~ ~ : ~
~£:..,. 1 55 Roanoke River at Williamston 0.2 37 4 3 O ,Jl,,. 56 (Roanoke River) Broad Cr. Slough
lfJ7 5
5
7
8
Welch Creek at Highway 64
~•·, Welch Creek Old Discharge Trowbridge Rd. -~-:Jh:. 59 Welsh Cr at old Weyerhauser discharge -·~Z "°. 60 Roanoke River near Weyerhauser discharge
"· -··· 61 Middle River at NC 45 TI~'." 62 '1i!--;: 63 ii~ 64 '~~-
4'le;l"." 65
~-1 66
l•~-r-;:~-67 ~~-tf.: ~--"'t,~ ;r;;~t r:.;,,.. .. . ,_
)
Albemarle Snd@ Terrapin Pt
Roanoke River at Marker 15
Roanoke River at Sans Souci
Roanoke River at Mouth
Cashie River at Windsor
Cashie River at Sans Souci F
0.4
0.4
38
31
19
25
222
total
7
5
4
4
33
total
5
4
4
2
100
40
0
0
20
average
14
0::
Figure 5. ROANOKE RIVER SYSTEM g;
ii: :z:
;.;,
}!,, ·.:: "!f
~>
t th ) ~;;;...----,64
·nJ,-=, "~,.
i
;'
..
' •.
;
' ,·
0 3
APPROXIMATE SCALE
(MILES)
WEYERHAUSER
i 0 :r:
(.)
ALBEMARLE
SOUND@)
t
'1{
[) DIOXIN FISH MONITORING LOCATIONS
□ MAJOR HIGHWAYS
OTHER LOCATIONS SHOWN IN FIGURE 2
15
: I
.~)
. ; .. """·1 ,. • ,.. .~..1· . ,
' ·• ..
~"'_··, ·7 .. . .
-
Current Fish Consumption Health Advisories for Dioxin in North Carolina
Pigeon River
No fish caught from the Pigeon River between Canton, N.C. and the
Tennessee state line. should be consumed.
Welch Creek
Welch Creek --the entire creek
Fish in Welch Creek may contain dioxins at levels of concern and should not
be eaten. Swimming, boating, and other recreational activities present no
health risks and are not affected by this advisory.
Roanoke River
Roanoke River --from to the mouth of the river emptying into Albemarle
Sound. (Includes Broad Creek Slough) to the Highway 17 bridge near
Williamston, N.C. Fish in the Roanoke River may contain low levels of
dioxins. Consumption of fish should be limited to one meal per person per
month. Children and pregnant or nursing women should not consume any
fish from the Roanoke River until further notice. Swimming, boating, and
other recreational activities present no health risks and are not affected by this
advisory. Striped bass, herring, and shad (including roe) are not covered by
this health advisory. Consumption of these three migratory fish species is
not considered to present a health risk.
Chowan River
Chowan River --the entire length of .the river in North Carolina to the
mouth emptying into Albemarle Sound. Catfish in the Chowan River may
contain low levels of dioxins. Consumption of catfish should be limited to
one meal per person every two months. Children and pregnant or nursing
women should not consume any catfish from the Chowan River until
further notice. All other fish in the Chowan River may be consumed with no
ligiitations as they have not been found to contain significant dioxins.
Swimming, boating, and other recreational activities present no health risks
and are not covered by this advisory.
Neuse River
Neuse River --from Fort Barnwell to a line across the river from Johnson
Point to McCotter Point (Minnesott Beach).
Fish in this area of the Neuse River may contain low levels of dioxins.
Consumption of fish should be limited to two meals per person per month.
Children and pregnant or nursing women should not consume any fish from
this area of the Neuse River until further notice. Striped bass, herring, and
shad (including roe) are not covered by this health advisory. Consumption of
these three migratory fish species is not considered to present a health risk.
Note:
These health advisories are only recommendations and do not constitute a
regulatory ban on fishing or fish consumption. Advisories will be updated as
necessary.
39
re·= JUTS
To: File
From: G.Doug Rumford~-~
Date: 6/26/95
Subject: Weyerhauser Co.-Plymouth
Plymouth, Martin County, NC
NCD 991 278 540
••• ·11
REF. 34
Memorandum
Wetlands, Critical Habitats, ·and Residential Population
On this day, I reviewed the critical habitats inventory maps maintained by the NC Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP). One critical habitat was identified along the 15-mile site surface water pathway. The habitat of the Tidewater Muckel (Lampsilis ochracea), a freshwater mollusk classified by the State as being of Special Concern, is located in the Roanoke River approximately 6.5 miles downstream of PPE #2 -Former Weyerhauser discharge to Welch Cr.
Huff Island has been identified as a breeding ground for the State dassified Significantly Ra~e Henslow's Sparrow (Ammodramus henslowii), and a habitat for the Significantly Rare Black Bear (Ursus americanus). The delta islands of the Roanoke River comprise the dedicated Federal Nature Preserve of the Tidal Cypress Gum Swamps.
According to the topographic maps comprising the 4-mile site radius of the Weyerhauser facility, almost the entire area north of the site is a wetland. This area, approximately 8000 acres, was measured with a digital planimeter, the wetland acreage was not broken down per distance ring. The nearest wetland, relative to the former chlorine production building is a 40 acre island located in the Roanoke River 600 feet north. The total surface water pathway wetland frontage was measured to be approx. 13. 5 miles.
A total of 50 residents have been identified by CGIA as living within 1 mile of the site although there were no households indicated within this distance. Visual observations of the area confirmed that no residences are present within 1 mile of the site. Consequently, the 50 residents indicated by CGIA have been disregarded as part of the population survey.
Attachment.
Ii
• i
II
I
IJ
I
I
' II
11 ,, ';
I.
'--• .! . . , .. ·,
'
_, .. ; __
-+-·
.,.._,._l
' --t-
i '.
I~:
,{,,'-l";:·,\
I. -, ~.-
2
LIST FORMAT
species are grouped by major taxa. Th~ vertebrates-are arranged by class, beginning
with the most advanced phyl~gem~t~cally (mammals). withi~ a givei;i ta1:'a, species are
listed alphabetically by scientific name. The following inforrnat7on,is presented
for each species on the list. "Status" is a word or phrase that 1.nd1.cates the
degree of protection (if any), based on rarity, of a species; "rank" is a numerical
scale of the rarity of a species, regardless of legal protection.
Scientific Name.
Common Name. For most groups, these names are not standardized.
North Carolina Status. Endangered, Threatened, and special Concern species of
Mammals, Birds, Reptiles, Amphibians, Freshwater Fishes, and Freshwater and.
Terrestrial Mollusks have legal protection status in North Carolina (Wildlife
Resources Commission). In addition to the above categories, the Natural Heritage
Program maintains computer and map files on significantly Rare, Vulne~able, and
Undetermined status species, as well as species considered Extirpated. Paper files
only are maintained for some of the above species; these species are indicated by
the phrase "not tracking."
STATUS STATUS
CODE
E Endangered
T Threatened
SC Special
Concern
DEFINITION
"Any native or once-native species of wlld animal whose
continued existence as a viable component of the State's
fauna is determined by the Wildlife Resources Commission
to be in.jeopardy or any species of wild animal
determined to be an 'endangered species' pursuant to the
Endangered Species Act." (Article 25 of Chapter 113 of
the General Statutes; 1987).
"Any native or once-native species of wild animal which
is likely to become an endangered species within the
foreseeable future throughout all or a significant
portion of its range, or one that is designated as a
threatened species pursuant to the Endangered Species
Act." (Article 25 of Chapter 113 of the General
Statutes; 1987). ·
"Any species of wild animal native or once-native to
North Carolina which is determined by the Wildlife
Res6urcea Commission to require monitoring but which may
be taken under regulations adopted under the provisions
of this Article." (Article 25 of Chapter 113 of the
General Statutes; 1987) •
. SR
EX
w
*
#
@
Significantly
Rare
Extirpated
Watch List
Any species which has not been listed by the N.C. Wildlife Resources Commission as an Endangered, Threatened, or Special Concern species, but which exists in the state in small numbers and has been determined by the N.c. Natural Heritage Program to need monitoring. (This is a N.C. Natural Heritage Program designation.) Significantly Rare species include "peripheral 11 species, whereby North Carolina lies at the periphery of the species' range (such as Purple Gallinule). The designation also includes marine and estuarine fishes identified as·"Vulnerable" by the N.C. State Museum of Biological Sciences (Roes et al., 1988, Endangered, Threatened, and Rare Fauna of North Carolina. Part II. A Re-evaluation of the Marine and Estuarine Fishes). Aleo included in the Significantly Rare designation are species formerly listed by the Natural Heritage Program (1991) as "Undetermined". "Undetermined" species are those that are secretive or are otherwise poorly known in North Carolina, which the Natural Heritage Program believes are rare and should be monitored.
A species which is no longer believed to occur in the state.
Any other species believed to be of conservation concern in the state because of scarcity, declining populations, threats to populations, ·or inadequacy of information to assess its rarity (see Page 33 for a more complete discussion). ·
Species is a game animal, and therefore (by law) cannot be liste~ for State protection as E, T, or sc.
Species proposed for Endangered status, but not adopted by the Wildlife Resources Commission; species is protected from taking.
species proposed for Special Concern status, but not adopted by the Wildlife Resources Commission; species is protected from taking.
3
il:·
I
' I
I
j
I
I
I
i ,. ,.
I
i .
·~ -,
' '
I-= ,.
~-•-i
I
1:
.I
Nehral Heritage Pr-ogr&11 List of the Rare Animls of lrlorth carol ina
Scientific Name
Province: Habitat
Comnon Name Status
Tadarida brasiliensis Brazilian Free-tailed Bat
C: roosts in buildings and other man-made structures
Trichechus manatus Uest Indian Manatee
T: warm waters of estuaries and river mouths
Ursus americanus Black Sear
MC: extensive montane forests; pocosins, swan-ps
BIRDS
Accipiter cooperii Cooper's Hawk
MPC: forests and woodlands (for nesting)
[breeding evidence only]
Accipiter gentilis Northern Goshawk
M: extensive, remote forests, mainly et high
elevations (for nesting)
[breeding evidence only]
Accipiter striatus Sherp·shiMed Hawk
MP: forests end woodlands (for nesting)
[breeding evidence only]
Aegol ius acadicus Northern Saw·whet Owl
M: spruce-fir forests or ·mixed hardwood/
spruce forests (for nesting)
[breeding season only]
Aimophila aestival is Bachmen's Sparrow CP: open longleaf pine forests, old fields
[breeding season only]
Arrmodrarus henslowii Henslow's Sparrow C: clearcut pocosins and other da111> weedy fields [breeding season only]
Anhinga anhinga Anhinga. C: wooded talc.es or ponds, or open SWBIJl)S (for nesting)
[breeding evidence only]
Aquila chrysaetos Golden Eagle
MC: extensive open country; formerly nested on cliffs
[regular wintering O\ surmering sites]
Bbtaurus lentiginosus American Bittern CT: fresh or braclcish marshes
[breeding season only]
CarrpeP.l'lilus principalis C: swarrps with mature tirrber
Ivory-billed ~oodpeclcer
[not traclcing; presl.lned extirpated in USA] Catharus guttatus Hermit Thrush M: spruce-fir forests (for nesting)
[breeding season only]
Charadrius melodus Piping Plover T: ocean beaches and island-end flats [breeding evidence only]
Chordestes gralTJT18cus Lark. Sparrow C: barren, sandy fields with scattered saplings in
the sandhills region
[breeding season only]
Circus cyaneus Northern Harrier T: extensive brackish marshes (for nesting)
[breeding evidence only]
Coccyzus erythropthalrus Blaclc-billed Cuclcoo M: deciduous forests, mainly et higher elevations
[breeding season end habitat only]
Colurbina passerine Corrmon Ground-Dove T: dunes, sandy fields, margins of maritime
woods end thickets
[breeding sea·s4?n only]
Contopus boreal is Olive-sided Flycatcher M: montene conifer forests (mainly spruce-fir)
with openings or deed trees
[breeding season only]
N.C. U.S.
SC
E
SR*
SC
SR
SR
SC
SC
SR
SR
SR
SR
E
SR
T
SR
SR
SR
SR
SC
E
C2
C2
C2
E
T
Rank
N.C. Global
SUB,S2N GS
S1N G2?
S3 GS
S2B,S3N G4
SUB,SZN G4
S2B,S4N GS
S2B,SZN GS
S3B,S2N G3
S2B,S1N G4
S2B,SZN GS
SXB7,S1N G4
S1B,S3N G4
sx G1
S1B,SSN GS
S2B,S2N G3
S18,SZN GS
S1B,S4N GS
S2B,SZN GS
S1B,S1N GS
S1B,SZN GS
11
Scientific Name
Province: Habitat
llahral Heritage Prograa List of the Rare Aniaels of North
Coomon Name
Fusconaia masoni
CP: most Atlantic drainages,
end upper Coastal Plain;
in lower Coastal Plain
cariosa
in lower Piednont
also in Black River
L~ilis
PC: a nurber of
Fall Line
river systems; mainly near the
L~ilis conspicuus
P: Neuse, Flat, and upper Pee Dee riVers
Larrpsilis crocata
C: Lake Waccamaw and vicinity; possibly Orton
Pond
Larrpsilis fasciola
M: French Broad, Pigeon, and Little Tennessee
rivers; currently known only in last river
Larrpsilis fullerkati
C: Lake Waccamaw and vicinity (endemic to North
Carolina and adjacent South Carolina)
Larrpsilis ochracea
CP: a nl.lrber of systems, primarily in the Coastal
Plain; abundant in Lake ~accamaw
Larrpsilis radiate
CP: a nl.lrber of river systems
Larrpsilis,·new species? (sp. 1)
P: Deep River
Lasmigona deCorata
P: Catawba and Pee Dee drainages in Union and
Mecklenburg counties (endemic to this.area and
adjac·ent South Carolina)
Lasmigona holstonia
M: Watauga River; formerly in Valley Creek in
Cherokee County
Lasmigona subviridus
CPH: Tar, Neuse, and Cape Fear systems downstate;
New end Watauga systems in mountains
Leptodea ochracea (see LelllJsilis)
Ligunia nasuta
C: Chowan, Roanoke, and Pamlico systems
Pegias fabule
M: Little Tennessee River; formerly in Valley
1· River in Cherokee County
Strophitus undulatus
P: Tar, Neuse, Cape Fear, and Pee Dee systems,
perhaps other systems in Piecinont
Toxolesma pullus
PC: a nurber of Atlantic drainages, most nlJl'lerous
in University Lake near Chapel Hill
Tritogonia verrucosa
M: New River near the Virginia border
Villosa constricts
PC: most Atlantic drainages, mainly in lower
Piednont
Villosa delurbis
PC: most Atlantic drainages
.Villosa nelx.!losa
M: French Broad, Hiwassee, and Little Tennessee
rivers; currently only known in the state from
the last river
Villosa vanuxemensis
M: French Broad and Hiwassee
Vil Losa vaughaniana
P: Pee Dee system (endemic
adjacent South Carolina)
systems
to North Carolina and
Atlantic Pigtoe
Yellow Lanprussel
a bivalve
Waccamaw Lanprussel
Wavy-rayed LBllpll.lssel
Waccamaw Fetll'l.lcket
Tidewater Muck.et
Eastern Lanprussel
a bivalve
Caroline Heelsplitter
Tennessee Heelsplitter
Green Floater
Eastern Poncirussel
Little-wing Pearlyrrussel
Squewfoot
Savannah Lilliput
Pistolgrip
Notched Rainbow
Eastern Creek.shell
Alabama Rainbow
Mountain Creekshell
Carolina Creek.shell
carol ina
Status
N.C. U.S.
T C2
T C2
SR
SC
SC
T C2
SC
SC
SR
E PE
E C2
E C2
SC
E E
T
T C2
E
SR
SR
SC
T
SC
N.C.
Sl
Sl
SU
S2
S2
Sl
S2
S2
SU
Sl
, Sl
Sl
S2
Sl
S2
S2
Sl
S3?
S3?
S2
Sl
S2
Rank
Global
G2
G4
G1G2Q
G1Q
(GU)
G4
Gl
G4
GS
(G4)
G1G2Q
Gl
G2
G4
(G3)
G4
(G3)
Gl
GS
(G4)
G3
G4
G4
G3G4
G3
G4
G3
19
Mr. Steve Tedder, Chief
Water Quality Section
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
Division of Environmental Management
PO Box 27687
. Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687
Dear Mr. Tedder:
re: Dioxin Analyses of Fish
NPDES NO. NC0000680
PO Box 1391
New Bern, North Caro!iru. 28563·1391
ph. 919-633-7279 Fax [phone]
Per the requirements of Weyerhaeuser Plymouth Mill's NP DES permit, enclosed is a
report covering fish dioxin studies during the fall of 1993. Two copies of the report are
provided. These studies were conducted with fish from the Roanoke River, Chowan
River, and Albemarle Sound.
Please call if you have any questions about aspects of the study not covered in the
report (919-633-7351).
Sincerely,
~,l._._ c c.Y~J_
Stephen E. Woock
Aquatic Scientist -Weyerhaeuser
cc : John Pritchard, Plymouth Mill
-iA IJ·~
Weyerhaeuser
RESEARCH REPORT
SOUTHERN ENVIRONMENTAL FIELD STATION
ES&T Research & Development New Bern, NC 28563
lJ Technical Report
□ Technical Note
□ Trip Report
□ Other
Title Page
Project No. 044-9309
Page I of39
ROANOKE RIVER, CHOWAN RIVER/HWY17, AND ALBEMARLE SOUND
FISH DIOXIN NPDES STUDY
PROJECT NO. 044-9309
September -November 1 993
*********
Prepared for Weyerhaeuser Pulp and Paper Mill
Plymouth, North Carolina
for submittal to NCDEM
*********
Strictly Proprietary (Red): Disclosure strictly limited to persons on a managed list. Contact
David McHenry
Proprietary (Yellow): Disclosure limited to persons confidentially bound to Weyerhaeuser on a need to know basis.
Non-Proprietary (Green): Disclosure unlimited ..
PLY/94/93PFISDX.DOC 3/16194
f:l!X3if6VCletll\'WRtt:'.Z rrnrrr tr:rnr \.
R .. ·' ,U:-,-j';:,·
I ~ '~:: ', 1::
'II
,I
11
' 11
11
' I j, . ., ,---
-~---' i~--1:~, 1:·
-· ,:_
,,-
1
A RESEARCH REPORT
ES& T Southern Environmental Field Station
Research & Development
Executive Summary
Project No. 044-9309
Page 2 of39
Fish fillets from the Roanoke River upstream and downstream of the Plymouth Mill,
the mouth of the Chowan River at Albemarle Sound, and western Albemarle Sound
were analyzed for tetrachlorinated dioxins and furans. The sampling was
conducted to fulfill an NPDES requirement from the North Carolina Division of
Environmental Management (NCDEM) and to monitor time trend changes in fish
dioxin concentrations. The fish were col.lected during September through
November of 1993. The report provides transfer of the dioxin data and ancillary
information to NCDEM.
Dioxin toxicity equivalent (TEO) is a measure of the summed concentrations of the
chlorinated dioxin and furan congeners, each expressed as the potential toxicity of
2,3,7,8-TCDD. In this study, only the 2,3,7,8-and total-tetrachlorinated dioxin
and furan congeners were measured; thus the TEOs are based only on the
concentrations of 2,3,7,8-TCDD and 2,3,7,8 -TCDF.
For all species, individual fillet sample concentrations of 2,3,7,8-TCDD ranged from
non-detect to 18.5 ppt. The TEOs ranged from 0.03 to 4.5 parts per trillion (ppt)
among all the sampled fish species except channel catfish. D.ioxin (TEO)
concentrations in channel catfish fillets were usually greater than the other species
at each location; channel catfish TEOs ranged from 0.81 ppt upstream at
Williamston, to 19.55 ppt downstream at Highway 32 in Albemarle Sound.
Channel catfish have greater dioxin concentrations because they have greater lipid
1 content compared with the other fish species sampled. The greater lipid pool in the
channel catfish provides a storage site for dioxins due to the tendency for dioxin to
partition strongly into lipids.
Comparing years, reported average TEO for the river and sound stations was one
ppt less in 1993 than in 1992. Excluding the upstream station at Williamston,
average TEO was 3.6 ppt in 1993 versus 4.6 ppt in 1992. However, for most of
the individual stations and fish species the lower 1993 concentrations can be
explained by decreases in average weight or lipid content of captured fish,
particularly catfish. In contrast, gamefish concentrations of 2,3, 7,8-TCDD were
similar to 1992 with slight increases noted among Albemarle Sound striped bass
samples. It is important to note that the general lower average weights of fish
captured in 1993 were not due to changes in sampling techniques or gear but
rather to inherent variability of fish sizes encountered during annual collecting
periods.
Strictly Proprietary (Red): Disclosure strictly limited to persons on a managed list. Contact
Proprietary (Yellow): Disclosure limited to persons confidentially bound to Weyerhaeuser on a need to know basis.
Non-Proprietary {Green): Disclosure unlimited.
PLY/94/93PFISDX.DOC 3/16/94
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
MEMORANDUM
TO: File
FROM: G.Doug Rumford
Hydrogeologist,
DATE: 10/11/96
REF. 36
NC Superfund
SUBJECT: Georgia-Pacific Corp. Hardwood Sawmill
Plymouth, Washington County, NC
NCD 000 813 592
Ownership of Adjacent Property
On this day I spoke with Lynn at the Washington County Register of Deeds in Plymouth,
NC to inquire about the property located near the gate to the former hardwood sawmill, adjacent
to Plymouth High School. This property (Parcel 2545, Block 99, Map 6767.08) is currently
owned by the Boy Scouts of America; the deed was tranferred on February 11, 1948 from the
seller, Still Realty.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
MEMORANDUM
TO: File
FROM: G.Doug Rumfor~
Hydrogeologist, Jll: Su~rfmd
DATE: 6/2/95
REF. 37
SUBJECT: Georgia-Pacific Corp. Hardwood Sawmill
Plymouth, Washington County, NC
NCO 000 813 592
Telecon with Mike Beachum, Outerbanks Contractors
On this day I spoke with Mike Beachum ofOuterbanks Contractors (919-261-2255)
regarding the former Georgia-Pacific Hardwood Sawmill plant in Plymouth, NC. Mr. Beachum
told me that Outerbanks Contractors leased the property from Decatur Partnerships. Outerbanks
Contractors, a subsidiary of Decatur Partnerships, used the southern portion of the property for
an asphalt mixing facility. The site is not currently in use by either Outerbanks Contractors or
Decatur Partnerships.
I told Mr. Beachum that on June 19, 1995, a site visit was planned and that sampling
would be conducted during the trip. He gave me access authorization to sample on the site and
mentioned that he was not interested in collecting any split samples.
I
·.~
I ' I ' ' ___ :,.
I
I
I
I
1·
I
I
, .. ,·-.
'ii'/
,,,
' u
,I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-1,,
,
REF. 38
SUPERFUND CHEMICAL DATA MATRIX
APPENDIX B TABLES
:1;.
I~.
·•.•o.J
I
I
.I
·I
I
1·
I
l·:t
,..:,..•
I
I
0
I
u
I
I
\:t•·
I ,,
Appendix B-1
Tables for Non-Radioactive Hazardous
Substances
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I-
I
I
I
I
I
I
1-
REF. 39
Inactive Hazardous Sites Program
Guidelines for Responsible
Party Voluntary Site Remedial Action
October 1996
North Carolina Department of
Environment, Health and Natural Resources
Division of Waste Management
Superfund Section
Inactive Hazardous Sites Branch
Post Office Box 27687
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687
Telephone: [phone]
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-•
I
I
I
I
I
I
Attachment C: Inactive Hazardous Sites Branch Health Based Remediation Goals
for Soil and Groundwater
Table C-1: Soil Remediation Goals (RG's) *
Cleanup below method detection limits, using analytical methods prescribed in these guidelines,
is not required This list is not meant to be comprehensive. The Branch will calculate RG 'sf or
chemicals not listed on the table if a request is submitted in writing.
21z § • ~i•i')f!;fi)V) :,•,:.
Acetone 67641
Acetone cyanohydrin 75865
Acetonitrile 75078
Acetoohenone 98862
Acrolein 107028
Acrylamide 79061
Acrvlic acid 79107
Acrylonitrile 107131
Aldicarb I 16063
Aldrin 309002
Allvl alcohol 107186
Allvl chloride 107051
4-Aminonvridine 504245
Ammonium sulfarnate 7773060
Aniline 62533
Antimony and comoounds 7440360
Antimony oentoxide 1314609
AntimonY ootassium tartrate 304610
Antimony tetroxide 1332316
Antimony trioxide 1309644
Arsenic 7440382
Benzene 71432
Benzenethiol 108985
Benzidine 92875
Benzoic acid 65850
Benzotrichloride 98077
Adapted from USEPA Regjon Ill Risk. Based Concentration Table, except as noted.
The RG is based on the carcinogenic endpoint and corresponds to an excess lifetime cancer risk of I in 1,000,000.
The RO is based on USEPA guidance on lead cleanup levels.
,. 2:.1 ,
1560 N
I 100 N
94 N
1560 N
320 N
0.14 C
7800 N
1.2 C
15.6 N
0.038 C
78 N
780 ;-,;N
0.32 N
3200 N
110 C
6.2 N
7.8 N
14 N
6.2 N
6.2 N
4.6 N
22 C
0.156 N
0.0028 C
62000 N
0.049 C
•
C
L
N The RO is based on the non-carcinogenic endpoint and ~esponds to a hazard quotient of0.2. Final RG a tabulated RO x 'I.~ where n ..
number of non-carcinogens and docs not exceed 5.
NA -
p
Not Available.
The RO ~ based on USEP A PCB sp;JJ policy.
Table C-1: Soil Remediation Goals (RG's)* -(Cont.)
w ~-CA<ITiNY /f::, :-.::-; i R/i iiiiihil ··•·• •· .,., " < ··•··.·
"-~·I chloride 100447
Rervlliwn and comnnunds 7440417
alnhaBHC 319846
l. betaBHC 319857
oarnma BHC n indane) 58899
technical BHC lhexachlorn=clohexane, all isomers) 608731
Bisf2-chloroethvl\ether I I I 444
Bisf2-ethvlhexv})nhthalate ffiEHP) 117817
Bis! chloromethvl.-ther 542881
Bromodichloromethane 75274
Bromoform (tribromomethane) 75252
Bromomethane 74839
4-Bromoohenvl ohenvl ether 101553
1-Butanol 71363
Butvl ben7V} ohthalate 85687
CacNivlic acid 75605
Cadmium and comoounds 7440439
Cantan 133062
Carharvl 63252
Carbon disulfide 75150
Carbon tetrachloride 56235
Chloral 75876
Chlordane 57749
Chlorine 7782505
2-Chloro-1,3-butadiene 126998
4-Chloro-2,2-methvlaniline hydrochloride 3165933
4-Chloro-2-methvlaniline 95692
. Chloroacetaldehvde 107200
* ·c
4-Chloroaniline 106478
Chlorobenzene 108907
Chlorobenzilate 510156
4-Chlorobenzotrifluoride 98566
1-Chlorobutane 109693
Adapted from USEPA Region III Risk Based Concentration Table, except as noted.
The RG is based on the carcinogenic endpoint and corresponds to an excess lifetime cancer risk of I in 1,000,000.
The RG is based on USEPA guidance on lead cleanup levels.
3.8
0.15
0.1
0.35
0.49
0.35
0.58
46
0.0029
JO
81
22
900
1560
3200
46
7.8
180
1560
1560
4.9
32
0.49
1560
320
1.4
I.I
108
62
320
2.4
320
6200
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
N
N
N
N
N
N
C
N
N
C
N
C
N
N
C
C
N
N
N
C
N
N
L
N The RO is based on the non-carcinogenic endpoint and corresponds to a hazard quotient of0.2. Final RO• tabulated RO x 'I.; where n =
number of non-carcinogens and docs not exceed 5.
NA ·
p
Not Available.
The RG is based on USEPA PCB spill policy.
C-2
I
I
I
I
I
I
I,
I
,, I""
1·
I::
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Table C-1: Soil Remediation Goals (RG's)* -(Cont.)
:.::,::((/·:::::::;:::::\/11 ... , F•••.>••·•Xt'Che~iJ111•• i::f//f:; ;·, ····.;.;,, ... , <•••·?+•T:/1 ?cA:i;;kN.'iltl t•i<••·•••·tRGi :..:.';;;; //./::?i:\'=:: :;,:··.:,:.:_',.;-,::.:=::::t::::
Cblorodibromomethane 124481
Chloroethane 75003
2-Cbloroethvl vinvl ether I 10758
Chloroform 67663
Cbloromethane 74873
beta-Cbloronaphthalene 91587
o-Cbloronitrobenzene 88733
p-Cbloronitrobenzeae !00005
2-Cbloropheno! 95578
o-Cblorotoluene 95498,
Chlomvrifos 29213~2
Chror.1ium III and comoounds 160638:, 1
Chromium VI and comoounds 1S5<0299
Coooer and compounds 7440508
Crotonaldehvde 123739
Cumene 98828
r,,anhle.~.· I I
Barium cvanide 542621
Calcium cyanide 592018
Copper cvanide 544923
Cvnnazinc 2 I 725452
Cvanm!en 460195
Cvanoe:e:1 bromide 506683
Cvaooien chloride 506774
Free cyanide 57125
Hvdrogcn cvaoide 74908
Potassium cvanide 15150~ -
P0tassium silver cvanide I 5066 ](,
Silver cyanide 5066.J9
Sodium cvanide 143339
Thiocvaoate NA
Zinc cvanide 557211
Cvclohexanone 108941
Adapted from USEPA Region III Risk Based Concentration Table, except as noted.
The RO is based on the carcinogenic endpoint and corresponds to Dn excess lifelime cancer risk of I in 1,000,000.
The RO is based on USEPAguidance on lead cleanup levels.
7.'6 C
6200 N
400 N
!CO C
49 C
1260 N
26 C
35 C
-7S N
320' N
46 N
156!JD1 .N
73! is/
620 N
0.34 C
620 N
I
1560 N
620: N
78 N
0.76 C
620 N
1400 N
780 N
320 N
320 N ---/ ,),J' N
3:00 N
' l56C: N
6201 N
' 32lli N
7RO N
780001 N
...
•
C
L
N The RO is based on the non-carcinogenic endpoint and corresponds to a hazard quotient of0.2. Final RG .. tabulated RG x 'I.; wht..-re n ...
number of non-carcinogens and does not exceed 5. ·
NA -p
Not Available.
The RO ~ based on USEPA PCB sp;u pohcy.
C-3
Table C-1: Soil Remediation Goals (RG's)* -(Cont.)
~ 0 .. 0: t:A/,;RN/• ···•·<•·••·····/·••J?(J.•1;;;;;;.~
2-r.vclohexvl-4,6-dinitroohenol ( 4,6-Dinitro-o-cvclohexvl ohenol) 131895
Dalanon 75990
DDD 72548
DDE 72559
DDT 50293
Diallate 2303164
Diazinon 333415
Dibenzofuran 132649
l ,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane 96128
1,2-Dibromoethane 106934
Di-n-butvl phthalate 84742
Dicamba 1918009
1,2-Dichlorobenzene 95501
1,3-Dichlorobenzene 541731
1,4-Dichlorobenzene 106467
3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine 91941
Dichlorodifluoromethane 75718 -
*
C
L
1, 1 :bichloroethane 75343
1,2-Dichloroethane ll'DC) 107062
1, 1-Dichloroethvlene 75354
1,2-Dichloroethvlene ( cis) 156592
1,2-Dichloroethvlene (mixture) 540590
1,2-Dichloroethvlene (transl 156605
2,4-Dichloroohenol 120832
2,4-Dichlorophenoxvacetic acid (2,4-Dl 94757
1,2-Dichloropropane 78875
2,3-Dichloroorooanol 616239
1,3-Dichloropropene 542756
Dichlorvos 62737
Dicofol 115322
Dieldrin 60571
Diethvl ohthalate 84662
Diethvlstilbestrol 56531
Adapted from USEPA Region III Risk Based Concentration Table. except as noted.
The RG is based on the carcinogenic endpoint and corresponds to an excess lifetime cancer risk of 1 in 1,000,000.
The RG is based on USEPA guidance on lead cleanup levels.
32 N
460 N
2.7 C
1.9 C
1.9 C
10 C
14 N
62 N
0.46 C
0.0075 C
1560 N
460 N
1400 N
1400 N
27 C
1.4 C
3200 N
1560 N
7 C
I.I C
156 N
140 N
320 N
46 N
156 N
9.4 C
46 N
3.7 C
2.2 C
1.5 C
0.04 C
12600 N
0.00014 C
N The RO is based on the non-carcinogenic endpoint and corresponds to a hazard quotient of0.2. Final RG ""tabulated RG x 5/~ where n"'
number of non-carcinogens and does not exceed 5.
NA.
p
Not Available.
The RG is based on USEPA PCB spill policy.
C-4
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Table C-1: Soil Remediation Goals (RG's)* -(Cont.)
~ •••••·••·CA:Cffi.NL /ti: <\••F{[{G ',"" -·
Dimethoate 60515 3.2 N;
3.3'-Dimetho=benzidine 119904 46 C
3,3'-Dimethvlbenzidine 119937 0.069 C
1, 1-Dimethvlhvdrazine 57147 0.25 C
1.2-Dimethvlhvdrazine 540738 0.017 C
2,4-Dimethvlohenol 105679 320 N
Dimethvl ohthalate 131113 156000 N
1,2-Dinitrohenzene (o-Dinitrohenzene) 528290 6.2 N
1,3-Dinitrobenzene (m-Dinitrobenzene) 99650 1.56 N
1,4-Dinitrobenzene fn-Dinitrobenzene) 100254 6.2 N
2.4-Dinitronhenol 51285 32 N
2,4-Dinitrotoluene 121142 32 N
2,6-Dinitrotoluene 606202 15.6 N
Dinitrotoluene mixture NA 0.94 C
Dinoseb 88857 15.6 N
1,4-Dioxane (o-Dioxane) 12391 I 58 C
-· ,.._,1 ~
2,3,7 ,8-H~tachlorodibenzo-o-dioxin (2,3,7 ,8-HPeCDDl NA 0.0004 c·
2,3, 7 ,8-Hexachlorodibenzo-o-dioxin (2,3, 7 ,8-HxCDD) NA 0.00004 ,, c· ..
Octachlorodibenzo-n-dioxin (OCDD) NA 0.004 C
2,3,7 ,8-Pentachlorodibenzo-n-dioxin (2,3,7 ,8-PeCDD) NA 0.000008 C
2,3,7 ,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-n-dioxin (2,3,7 ,8-TCDD) 1746016 0.000004 C
2,3, 7 ,8-Hentachlorodibenzofuran 12,3, 7 ,8-HPCDFl NA 0.0004 C
2,3, 7 ,8-Hexachlorodibenzofuran 12,3,7 ,8-HxCDF) NA 0.00004 C
Octochlorodibenzofuran (OCDF) NA 0.004 C
1,2,3, 7 .8-Pentachlorodibenzofuran /J ,2,3,7 ,8-PeCDF) NA 0.00008 C
2,3,7 ,8-Pentachlorodibenzofuran /2,3,7 ,8-PeCDF) NA 0.000008 C
, 1 7 R-Tetrachiorodiben,ofura" '2 l 7 8-TrDF\ NA . 0(10004 C
Diohenvlamine 122394 400 N
1,2-Diohenvlhvdrazine 122667 0.8 C
Diauat 85007 34 N
Disulfoton 298044 . 0.62 N
Diuron 330541 32 N
Adapted from USEPA Region III Risk Based Concentration Table, except as noted. •
C
L
N
The RG is based on the c:arcinogenic endpoint and corresponds to an e~ lifetime cancer risk of I in 1,000,000.
The RG is based on USEPA guidance on lead cleanup levels.
The RG is based on the non-carcinogenic endpoint and corresponds to a hazard quotient of0.2. Final RO= tabulated RG x 't.;. where n ..
number of non-carcinogens and docs not exceed 5.
NA -
p
Not Available.
The RO is based on USEPA PCB spill policy.
C - 5
Table C-1: Soil Remediation Goals (RG's)* -(Con£)
~ ~ VCA!{kN.r : ,r:r:•·•'••k{;1,;,;,;;1_J
Endosulfan I I 5297
Endothall 145733
Endrin 72208
Eoichlorohvdrin 106898
Ethion 563122
2-Etho=ethanol I 10805
Ethv I acetate 141786
Ethv I •=late 140885
Ethv !benzene 100414
Ethvlene diamine 107153
Ethvlene oxide 75218
Ethvlenethiourea i'ETU) 96457
Ethvl ether 60297
Ethvl methacrvlate '97632
Fonnaldehvde 50000
Fannie acid 64186
Furan 110009
Furfural ~-98011
Glvcidaldehvde 765344
Hentachlor 76448
Hentachlor enoxide 1024573
Hexachlorobenzene 118741
Hexachlorobutadiene 87683
Hexachlorocvclopentadiene 77474
Hexachloroethane 67721
Hexachloroohene 70304
· Hvdrazine 302012
Hvdrooen sulfide 7783064
Isoohorone 78591
K~ne 143500
Lead 7439921
Malathion 121755
Maleic anhvdride 108316
Adapted from USEPA Region III Risk Based Concentration Table, except as noted.
The RO is based on the carcinogenic endpoint and corresponds to an excess lifetime cancer risk of I in 1,000,000.
The RO is based on USEPA guidance on lead cleanup levels.
94
320
4.6
65
7.8
6200
14000
13
1560
320
0.63
5.4
3200
1400
3200
32000
15.6
46
6.2
0.14
0.07
0.4
8.2
110
46
4.6
0.21
46
670
0.035
400
320
1560
}},')
N
N
N
C
N
N
N
C
N
N
C
C
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
C
C
C
C
N
C
N
C
N
C
C
L
N
N
•
C
L
N The RG is based on the non~ogenic endpoint and corresponds to a hazard quotient of0.2. Final RG = tabulated RG x 'I.; where n =
number of non~gcns and does not exceed 5.
NA •
p
Not Available.
The RG is based on USEPA PCB spill policy.
C-6
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1··
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
--I
II
I
Ii
I
I
'
II
I
I
I
II
I
Ill
I
I
I
* C
L
Table C-1: Soil Remediation Goals (RG's)* -(Cont.)
, .... ~·c• •·· /ii.·••···· •••··.· ri,emical ··•·· . · .. >.: I CASRN :••·I <i .: <·•RG.inrinil•
Maleic hydrazide 123331
Malononitrile 109773
Merclll1' (inon:anic) 7439976
Methacrvlonitrile 126987
Methanol 67561
Methomvl 16752775
Metho""chlor 72435
2-Methvl benzenamine (2-methvlaniline) 95534
2-Methvl benzenamine hvdrochloride (2-methvlaniline hvdrochloride' 636215
Methvl chlorocarbonate 79221
4,4'-Methylene bis(2 chloroaniline) 101144
Methylene bromide 74953
Methylene chloride 75092
Methyl ethyl ketone IMFK) 78933
Methvl hydrazine 60344
Methyl isobutvl ketone (4-methvl-2-pentanone) 108101
Methvl methacrvlate 80626
Methvl parathion 298000
3-MethvlPhenol (m-cresol) 108394
2-Methvlohenol ( o-cresoll 95487
4-Methylphenol io-cresol) 106445
2-Methly -1-propanol (isobutanol, isobutvl alcohol) 78831
Naled 300765
2-Naohthvlamine 91598
Nickel and comoounds 7440020
Nitric oxide 10102439
4,Nitroaniline 100016
Nitrobenzene 98953
Nitrogen dioxide 10102440
4-Nitroohenol 100027
2-Nitropropane 79469
N-Nitrosodiethanolarnine 1116547
N-Nitrosodiethvlamine 55185
..
Adapted from USEPA Region Ill Risk Based Concentration Table, except as noted.
The RO is b4sed on the carcinogenic endpoint and corresponds to an excess lifetime canctr risk of 1 in 1,000,000.
The RO is based on USEPA guidance on lead cleanup levels.
7800
0.32
4.6
1.56
7800
400
78
2.7
3.5
15600
4.9
156
85
9400
0.58
1260
1260
4
. 780 -
780
78
4600
32
0.0049
320
1560
46
7.8
15600
960
0
0.23
0.0043
····•:·•·•:•::\·:
N
·N
·N
N
N
N
N
C
C
N
C
N
C
N
C
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
C
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
C
C
N The RO is based on the non-carcinogenic endpoint and corresponds to a hazard quotient of0.2. Final RG = tabulated RG x 'I.~ where n =
nwnber of norH:areinogcns and does not exceed 5.
NA· p
Not Avai1ab1e.
The RG i, based on USEPA PCB spill policy.
C-7
..
Table C-1: Soil Remediation Goals (RG's)* -(Cont.)
.\ .............. <•·• i ; < >Chemical \ r C -··•.• \ ··•· . . CAf.JRN .· ·· kGf;,;,"ii,l > >·•·
N-Nitrosodirnethvlamine 62759 0.013 C
N-Nitrosodi-n-butvlamine 924163 0.12 C
' N-Nitroso di-n-pronvlamine 621647 0.091 C
N-Nitrosodiohenvlamine 86306 130 C
N-Nitroso-N-ethvlurea ( ethvlnitrosourea) 759739 0.0046 C
N-Nitrosonvnnlidine 930552 0.3 C
o-Nitrotoluene 88722 156 N
m-Nitrotoluene 99081 156 N
o-Nitrotoluene 99990 156 N
Octamethvlnvrnnhosnhoramide 152169 32 N
di-n-Octvl ohthalate 117840 320 N
Paraauat 1910425 70 N
Parathion 56382 94 N
Pentachlorobenzene 608935 12.6 N
Pentachloronitrobenzene 82688 2.5 · C
Pentachloroohenol 87865 5.3 C
Phenol 108952 9400 N
p-Ph'envlenediamine 106503 3000 N
Phenvlmercuric acetate 62384 1.26 N
Phorate 298022 3.2 N
Phosnhine 7803512 4.6 N
Phosnhorus (white) 7723140 0.32 N
Phthalic anhvdride 85449 32000 N
Polychlorinated biohenyls (PCBs) 1336363 I p
-.
Acenaohthene 83329 940 N
Anthracene 120127 4600 N
Bonzo[ a lnvrene 50328 0.088 C
Benzofb lfluoranthene 205992 0.88 C
Benzofk lfluoranthene 207089 8.8 C
Benzr al anthracene 56553 0.88 C
Carbofuran 1563662 78 N
Chrvsene 218019 88 C
• Adapted from USEPA Region llI Risk Based Concentration Table, except as noted.
C
L
N
The RG is based on the carcinogenic endpoint and con-esponds to an excess lifetime cancer risk of 1 in 1,000,000.
The RG is based on USEPA guidance on lead cleanup levels.
The RG is based on the non-carcinogenic endpoint and corresponds to a hazard quotient of0.2. Final RG = tabulated RG x 'I.; where n""
number of non-carcinogens and docs not exceed S.
NA.
p
Not Available.
The RG is based on USEPA PCB spill policy.
C-8
I
I
I
I
I
I
II
II
II
II
I
II
I
I
I
I
I
-1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Table C-1: Soil Remediation Goals (RG's)* -(Cont.)
I ,, 2 ~ ·~'·'· ii: ' C:4.SRN( ·:.::.;: :-:.\ >k(;i, :C::":C:
Dibenzf ah lanlhracene 53703 0.088 C
Fluoranthene 206440 620 N
Fluorene 86737 620 N
Indennfl ,2,3-cd\nvrene 193395 0.88 C
N aohthalene 91203 620 N
o.~e 129000 460 N
Pronamide 23950585 1180 N
Prooaroite 2312358 320 N
Proparovl alcohol 107197 32 N
Pmnazine 139402 320 N
Pronvlene oxide 75569 2.7 C
Pvridine 110861 15.6 N
Quinoline 91225 0.053 C
Selenious acid 7783008 78 N
Selenium 7782492 78 N
Selenciurea 630104 78 N
Silver and comoounds 7440224 78 N
Sodium azide 26628228 62 N -
Sodium fluoroacetate 62748 0.32 N
Strvchnine -57249 4.6 N
Stvrene 100425 .. 3200 N
2,3,7,8-TCDD /dioxin\ 1746016 ---4. !0e-06 C
1,2,4,5-Tetrachlorobenzene 95943 4.6 N
I, 1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 79345 3.2 C
I, I, 1,2-Tetrachloroethane 630206 25 C
Telrachloroethvlene /PCE) 127184 12 C
2,3,4,6-Tetrachloronhenol 58902 460 N
p,a,a,a-Tetrachlorotoluene 5216251 0.032 C
Tetraethvldithionvmnhosnhale 3689245 7.8 N
Tetraethvl lead 78002 0.00156 N
Thallic oxide 1314325 1.1 N
Thallium NA 1.26 N
Thallium acetate 563688 1.4 N
Adapted from USEPA Region m Risk Based Concentration Table, except as noted. *
C
L
N
The RG is based on the carcinogenic endpoint and corresponds to an excess lifetime cancer risk of I in 1,000,000.
1be RG is based on USEPA guidance on lead cleanup levels.
The RO is based on the non~ogenic endpoint and corresponds to a hazard quotient of0.2. Final RO• tabulated RO x 'I.; where n ..
number ofnotKarcinogens and does not exceed,.
NA -
p
Not Available.
The RO is based on USEPA PCB spill 1X>licy.
C-9
Table C-1: Soil Remediation Goals {RG's)* -(Cont.)
,',, ' ·~ '\ >CASRNT •:;,c:,·;;,:,:>,)?GiliiiliJ.,. ., ·~
Thallium carbonate 6533739 1.26 N
Thallium chloride 7791120 1.26 N
Thallium nitrate 10102451 1.4 N
Thallium selenite 12039520 1.4 N
Thallium sulfate 7446186 1.26 N
Thiofanox 39196184 4.6 N
Thiram 137268 78 N
Toluene !08883 3200 N
Toluene-2,4-diamine 95807 0.2 C
Toluene-2,6-diamine 823405 3200 N
o-Toluidine 106490 3.4 C
Toxaohene 8001352 0.58 C
I, 1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-trifluoroethane 76131 200000 N
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 120821 156 N
I, I, I-Trichloroethane 71556 540 N
I , 1,2-Trichloroethane 79005 11 C
Trichloroethylene (TCE) 79016 58 C
Tricnlorofluoromethane 75694 4600 N
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol 88062 58 C
2,4 ,5-Trichlorophenol 95954 1560 N
2-(2,4,5-Trichlorophenoxv)oropionic acid 93721 126 N
2,4,5-Trichlorophenoxvacetic acid 93765 156 N
I, 1,2-Trichloroorooane 598776 78 N
1,2,3-Trichloroorooane 96184 0.091 C
1,3,5-Trinitrobenzene 99354 0.78 N
Vanadium nentoxide 1314621 140 N
Vinyl acetate 108054 15600 N
Vinyl chloride 75014 0.34 C
o-Xvlene 95476 32000 N
m-Xvlene 108323 32000 N
Xvlene /mixed) 1330207 32000 N
Zinc 7440666 4600 N
Zinc phosphide 1314847 4.6 N
Adapted from US EPA Region III Risk Based Concentration Table, except as noted. *
C
L
N
1bc RG is based on the carcinogenic endpoint and correspond., to an excess lifetime cancer risk of I in 1,000,000.
1be RG is based on USEPA guidance on lead cleanup levels.
The RO is based on the non-carcinogenic endpoint.and corresponds to a hazard quotient of0.2. Final RG '"'tabulated RG x 'I.; where n •
number of non-carcinogens and does not exceed S.
NA -p
Not Available.
The RG is based on USEPA PCB spill policy.
C -IO
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I-
I_
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Table C-2: Groundwater Remediation Goals (RG's)1.2
Cleanup be/aw method detection limits, using analytical methods prescribed in these guidelines, is not
required This list is not meant to be comprehensive. The Branch will calculate RG 's for chemicals not
listed on the table if a request is submitted in writing.
~ ~'<'D1'L~ \(ii?/i/RG.••@fab)•' f i.:::::C:: ,-
Acenaphthene 83329 80
Acenaphthylene 208968 210
Acetone 67641 700
Acrylamide 79061 0.01
Aldicarb' 116063 7
Ammonia' 7664417 1100
Anthracene 120127 2100
Antimony' 7440360 6
Arsenic' 7440382 0.045
Barium 7440393 2000
Benzene 71432 I
Benzo(a)anthracene 56553 0.0479
Beryllium 7440417 -4
Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate 117817 .. 3 ,
..
Bromodichloromethane 75274 0.56
Bromofonn 75252 0.19
Butyl benzyl phthalate 85687 100
Cadmium 7440439 5
Caprolactarn 105602 3500
Carbon disulfide 75150 700
Carbofuran 1563662 36
Carbon tetrachloride 56235 0.3
Chlordane 57749 0.027
I Chlorobenzene 108907 50
Chlorodibromomethane' 124481 80
Chloroform 67663 0.19
2-Chlorophenol 95578' 0.1
Chromium 744073 50
Chrysene 218019 4.79
Copper 7440508 1000
See footnotes at the end of Table C-2.
C -11
'I
I --.
,I •
.• ' lo,
Table C-2: Groundwater Remediation Goals (Cont.)
~ ~ r•51'i;,11N\··,.,.,.···•·'> } }{RG.'.'(ftpb) {r'···•,·,.,·,, ......
Cyanide 57125 154
1.2-Dibromo-3-<:hloropropane 96128 0.025
1,2-Dicblorobenzene 95501 620
1,3-Dicblorobenzene 541731 620
1,4-Dichlorobenzene 106467 75
Dichlorodifluoromethane (Freon-12) 75718 1400
1,1-Dichloroethane 75343 700
1,2-Dichloroethane 107062 0.38
I, 1-Dichloroethylene 75354 7
cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene 156902 70
trans-1,2-Dicbloroethylene 156605 70
2,4-Dichlorophenoxy-acetic-acid (2,4-D) 94757 70
1,2-Dichloropropane 78875 0.56
1,3-Dichloropropene 542756 0.19
Diethyl p!Jthalate 84662 5000
Di-n-butyl phthalate 84742 700
Diquat• 85007 20
para-Dioxan~ 12391 I 7
Dioxin 1746016 2.2 X 10"7
Endosulfan 7 I 15297 42
Endrin 72208 2
Ethlylbenzene 100414 29
Ethylene dibromide 106934 0.0004
Fluoranthene 206440 280
Formaldehyde' 50000 1400
Heptacblor 76448 0.008
Heptacblor epoxide 1024573 0.004
Hexachlorobenzene I 18741 0.02
Hexachlorobutadiene• 87683 I
' Hexachlorocyclopentadiene' 608731 50
Lead 7439921 15
Lindane 58899 0.2
Mercury 7439976 1.1
See footnotes at the end of Table C-2.
C-12
.
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ill
I
I
I
Table C-2: Groundwater Remediation Goals (Cont.)
I
-•
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
•··•·· .... ~
Methanol
Methoxychlor
Methyl ethyl ketone
4-Methyl phenol'
Methylene chloride
Napthalene
Nickel
Pentachlorophenol
Phenol
PCB's'
Pyrene
Selenium
Silver
Styrene
2,4,5-TP'
1,2,4,5-Tetrachlorobenzene'
I, 1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane'
Tetrachloroethylene
Thallium'
Toluene
Toxaphene
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene'
I, I, I-Trichloroethane
I, 1,2-Trichloroethane•
Trichloroethylene
Trichlorofluoromethane
Vinyl chloride
Xylenes
Zinc
I Footnotes listed on the following page.
I
-~'
I C-13
I
Xii )( >·•·•··· ?RG•'(ppb)t·••• r·•·rr·•·•··· ·
67561 ' 3500
72435 35
78933 170
106445 35
75092 5
91203 21
7440020 100
87865 0.3
108952 300
1336363 0.5
129000 210
7782492 50
7440224 18
100425 100
93765 50
95943 . 2• I
79345 0.167
127184 0.7
7440280 0.5
108883 1000
8001352 0.031
120821 70
71556 200
79005 3
79016 2.8
75694 2100
75014 0.Dl5
1320000 530
1310000 2100
Footnotes
For each contaminant the lower of the 15A NCAC 2L (2L) standard, interim standard, the USEPA non -zero MCLG, or the
USEPA MCL was retained as the remediation goal. In cases where a 2L standard, interim standard, USEPA non-zero
MCLG, or USEPA MCL were not available or sufficiently protective, the appropriate remediation goal was determined as
per footnotes 5, 6, and 7.
2 All RG's Wlless otherwise specified by footnotes are the 15 NCAC 2L standard or interim standard.
3 USEPA MCL.
4 USEPAMCLG.
5 The RG is based on the carcinogenic endpoint for exposure through ingestion and inhalation (volatiles), and corresponds to
an excess lifetime cancer risk of l .0E-06.
6
7
RG = 1.OE-06 x 25 550 days
350 days!year[(l .08 liters-yearlkg-day x slope factor oral kg-day/mg) +(1.08 liters-year/kg-day)(slope factor inhalation
kg-day/mg)]
For volatile carcinogens it is assumed that the amount of contaminant inhaled is equal to that of ingesting 2-liters of
contaminated water a day (USEPA Region IV guidance).
The RG is based on the carcinogenic endpoint for exposure through the ingestion route (non-volatile). RG obtained from
USEPA Region Ill Risk-Based Concentration Table and corresponds to an excess lifetime cancer risk of l .0E-06.
The RG is based on the non-carcinogenic endpoint for exposure through the ingestion route.
RG = 0.2 X RID mg/kg/day x 70 kg body wt
2 liters water ingested/day
(15 NCAC 2L equation for non-carcinogens)
C -14
I
I
I
I
I
I
I]
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Attachment D: Sensitive Environment Contacts
SENSITIVE ENVIRONMENT
National Parks and Slate Parks
Designated and Proposed Federal and State
Wilderness and Natural Areas
SOURCE OF INFORMATION
NC Division of Parks and
Recreation • Natural Heritage
Program
Sensitive Areas Identified Under the ~a_tional Estuary •.
Program or the Near Coastal Waters Program
Critical Areas Identified Under the Clean Lakes
Program
National and State Seashore, Lakeshore and River
Recreational Areas
Critical Habitats or Habitats Known to be Used by
State or Federally Designated or Proposed
Endangered or Threatened Species or Species Under
Review as to Their Endangered or Threatened Status
National and State Preserves and Forests
National or State Wildlife Refuges
Federal Land Designated for Protection of Natural
Ecosystems
Terrestrial Areas Utilized for Breeding by Large or
Dense Aggregations of Animals
Areas Important to Maintenance of Unique Biotic
Communities
State-Designated Areas for Protection or Maintenance
of A uatic Life
Marine Sanctuaries
National Monuments
National and State Historical Sites
National and State Seashore, Lakeshore and River
Recreational Areas
State or Federal Designated Scenic or Wild Rivers
NOAA
US Park Service
NC Department of Cultural
Resources
NC Division of Parks and
Recreation -Planning and
Development Section
TELEPHONE# ..
(919) 733-7)0 I
. '
[phone]
[phone]
[phone]
[phone]
SENSITWE ENVIRONMENT SOURCE OF INFORMATION
Areas Identified Under Coastal Protection Legislation NC Division of Coastal
Management
Coastal Barriers or Units of a Coastal Barrier
Resow-ces System
Spawning Areas Critical for the Maintenance of
Fish/Shellfish Species within River, Lake or Coastal
Tidal Waters
Migratory Pathways and Feeding Areas Critical for
Maintenance of Anadromous Fish Species within
River Reaches or Areas in Lakes or Coastal Tidal
Waters in which such Fish Spend Extended Periods of
Time
State Lands Designated for Wildlife or Game
Management
State-Designated Areas for Protection or Maintenance
of A uatic Life
Wetlands -(On site or adjacent to site)
NC Wildlife Resow-ces
Commission
US Army Corps of Engineers
D-2
TELEPHONE#
[phone]
[phone]
[phone]
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1--
1
I
I
I
I
••
I
I
I
I
I
l
J
I
~
J
l
r
t
~
l
t
I
I
.
Attachment E: Checklist for Independent Remedial Action Report
The checklist below follows the organization of section 6.0. of the guidelines. Please indicate
whether each item is included, and identify its location in the final report (section and page).
Ttoni I ii\II
Section 6.0 Item 1. ·
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
Section 6.0 Item 2.
1
..
2
3
4
5
6
7
\ .• ~ §1[,t,lritihilal'iio)<ii>"ciiiii' :• I± · ... 4:/ii:fifiiO.t:/sl<ifo',iI::['Pi~if' ..
1 lf---------+-"----------------t------------------l
lf-----9-1-------'-----t--------1
10
ll---------ll-+----------------1--------------m
12
,1--______ 1_3--1---------------+--------------D
Section 6.0 Item 3.
U----S_ec_t_io_n_6_.o_It_em_4_. +----------------1---------------'
Section 6.0 Item 5.
a. 11----------+------------------ll------------------; I
11------b·--------+-------I
C.
11------d·-+--------+-------I
e.
lf------f-1---------t--------•
(C:\WPWIN60\WPDOCS\GUIDEUNES\GUIOLNI0.96) g I
* For any item marked "no," provide an explanation for why it is not submitted or is not applicable.
I
Signature of Responsible Party or Consultant Date
I
I
I
.-
I
E-2
I
I
P77?!"fmmfm:::e:rt::mzeswrr.,. 7:rtnrzt rs mus
I
I
D
I
g
I, I
( I
1•
-1
REF. 40
FIT REPORT
SITE INSPECTION PRIORITIZATION
GEORGIA-PACIFIC CORPORATION
HAROWOOO SAWMILL
PLYMOUTH, WflSHIHGTOH CO. tlC
NCO OOIO 813 592
I
' ' I.
I I
' .,
'I
'Ii
:I i
·I
I
I
I
I
I
I
D
u
ID
11,
I I
I I
••
11
~· '
□YNAMAC
CORPORATION
Environmental Services
Peachtree Center Tower
230 Peachtree Slreet, N.W.
Suite 500
Atlanta, GA 30303
Telephone: 404·681-0933
Fax: [phone]
April 15, 1994
Mr. Narindar Kumar, Acting Chief
Site Assessment Section
U.S. EPA Region IV
345 Courtland Street, NE
Atlanta, Georgia 30365
t,-'"''11.
APR 181994 I REr;en,r:.o
I fvlAY241994
l surERFUNr: ;:,1;:,i:.r1oN /
Re: Work Assignment C04119 -Site Inspection Prioritization Report -Georgia-Pacific
Corporation Hardwood Sawmill, Plymouth, Washington County, North Carolina
Document Control No. C04119-SIP-LC-500
Dear Mr. Kumar:
Enclosed please find the Site Inspection Prioritization Report for the Georgia-Pacific Corporation
Hardwood Sawmill in Plymouth, Washington County, North Carolina. This report has been
developed to partially fulfill the requirements for TES VIII Work Assignment No. C04119, Task 5.
This submittal includes a site map, supporting reference materials and a CERCLA Eligibility Form.
If you have any questions or comments, please contact either of us at [phone].
Sincerely,
(j~-AM~~~ ~;1.RPO~N . ff1/' )
. q,'., /lf'11 (Jv:;!-;t./!'C v Y
Critt nden ,
Site Manager Regional Manager
Enclosures
cc: Ken Meyer, EPA Region IV Project Manager (w/o enclosures)
Jack Silvey, Dynamac TES Program Manager (w/o references)
Earl Bozeman, EPA Region IV Acting Work Assignment Manager
Katharine Siders Franklin, Dynamac Work Assignment Manager (w/o references)
TES WA File
Corporate Headquarters: The Dynamac Building, 2275 Research Bou1evard, Suite 500, Rockville, MO 20850-3268
I State of North Carolina · Department of Environment,
11 Health and Natural Resources
II Division of Solid Waste Management
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor n Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary.
William L. Meyer, Director
I
I
D
I
1,
I
I '
g
D
I
I·
I
June 14, -~996 ___ .
Ms. Cynthia Gurley
NC CERCLA Project Officer
US EPA Region IV Waste Division, 6th Floor
345 Coiirtland Street, NE ·
Atlanta, GA 30365
Subject: Site Inspection Prioritization -Revised
Weyerhauser Co./Plymouth (NCD 991 278 540)
Plymouth, Martin County, NC
Dear Ms. Gurley:
This revised report contains the findings of the Site Inspection Prioritization (SIP) of the
Weyerhauser Co. /Plymouth site (NCD 991 278 540), located on State Road 1565, Plymouth, Martin
County, North Carolina. Please refer to the original June 30, 1995 SIP report for all references,
tables, and figures.
The Weyerhauser Co. site is an active wood and paper products manufactui:ing facility .... ~-located on State Road 1565 in Plymouth, Martin County, NC. Weyerhauser has been in operation
at this site since 1957 when the company merged .with the Kieckhefer-Eddy Co. who began
operations at the site in 1937. The paper bleaching operation began at the site in the mid-1940's. The
Wood Products Division of Weyerhauser produces finished lumber and plywood from raw pine and
hardwoods. Since 1979, Weyerhauser has been treating lumber with a chromated copper arsenate
process that produces approximately 1500 pounds of treatment sludge per quarter. --A collection
system is used to capture excess treatment solution and sludge which is then shipped off-site to a
RCRA disposal facility.
A mercury cell chlorine plant was operational at the site from approximately 1952 to. 1965.
Spent graphite electrodes and marble cells, having absorbed mercury during the chlorine production
process, were disposed ofin an on-site landfill with other mill wastes. The exact quantity of mercury
disposed of during this period is unknown. However, Weyerhauser Co. estimates range from 60
pounds to 11,000 pounds of mercury. A series ofU-drains in the floor of the building collected spilled
process fluid and directed it toward a collection sump which in tum discharged to a drainage trench
that emptied into the Roanoke River. The chlorine production building was demolished in 1987;
approximately 1,300 tons of mercury contaminated soil and
I P.O. Box 27687, .
. Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687
Voice 919-733-4996
FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer
50% recycled/10% post-consumer paper
~
I_~:
'I -~~
l,.
I
I
I
m
'
D
I
1,
I
I
I
••
D
u
D
m
I
I
Ms. Gurley
June 14, 1996
Page2
debris was removed to the GSX hazardous waste landfill in Pinewood, South Carolina. The area of
the former building was then backfilled with clean fill and capped with asphalt pavement.
Mercury contaminated soils remain in place at a depth of approximately 4.5 feet below land
surface due to a high water table. Three shallow (12 ft) monitoring wells were constructed in a
triangular pattern around the area of the former chlorine building. Groundwater from the monitoring
well between the former building and the river consistently reveals elevated levels-of-mercury. A ¥C ,,. background monitoring well is free of mercury contamination. ··---
From the time operations began at the facility, untreated process wastewater from the paper
products division was originally discharged to the Roanoke River. _ During the period between the
early l 960's and 1968, all untreated process wastewater was discharged to Welch Creek instead of
the Roanoke River. Since 1968, all process wastewater except cooling water has been treated at an
on-site secondary treatment facility prior to discharge. Wastewater is directed to two settling ponds
where solids are allowed to settle out and removed for burning in the plants' steam boiler:
Wastewater is then sent to an aeration basin and finally to a serpentine retention pond approximately
750 acres in size. During the period between 1968 to 1988, wastewater from the retention pond was
discharged to Welch Creek. Since 1988, Weyerhauser has been discharging treated process
wastewater to the Roanoke River at a point approximately 1/2-mile downstream of the facility . The
Weyerhauser Paper Company currently holds an NPDES Permit (# 0000680) to discharge treated
wastewater, non-contact cooling water, and storm water runoff to the Roanoke River. Under the
permit, Weyerhauser has a discharge limit of 1.3 pg/I of dioxin and is required to sample its effluent
quarterly. Weyerhauser's original NPDES Permit was issued in 1975.
In 1985, a Site Inspection was conducted by the North Carolina Solid and Hazardous Waste
Management Branch/CERCLA Unit. No sampling was conducted during the Site Inspection. A fish
consumption advisory has been issued by the NC Division of Environmental Management for the
Roanoke River and Welch Creek based on fish tissue samples collected in 1988 exhibiting high dioxin
concentrations.
Sampling for the Weyerhauser Co. SIP (June 19-20, 1995) focused on sediment and surface
water samples collected from the Roanoke River which is a closed fishery and has significant wetland
surface water pathway frontage. Sediment and surface water samples were also collected from
Welch Creek. An off-site drinking water sample was collected from the nearest residential well
located at the James Johnson residence; an on-site .drinking water sample was collected from
Weyerhauser well #13. All samples were analyzed under the US. Environmental Protection Agency
{EPA) Contract Laboratory Program {CLP). No further waste/source sampling was performed at
the facility during the SIP.
Prior sampling data indicates that the shallow groundwater aquifer and subsurface soils under
the former chlorine production building have been impacted by a release of mercury. Elevated levels
of dioxin/furan have also been found in fish tissue samples collected from the Roanoke River and
Welch Creek below Weyerhauser discharge points. The laboratory analytical data for sediment
samples collected from the surface water pathway during the SIP indicate that an observed release
of mercury has occurred, as well as the same isomers of dioxin/furan detected in fish tissue.
I
I
I
I
fi
I
Ms. Gurley
June 14, 1996
Page3
The drinking water samples were found to be free of chemical contaminants. Based on the above
factors, it is apparent that the site poses a threat to human health and the environment and is in need
of additional action under CERCLNSARA. The Weyerhauser Co./Plymouth site is therefore
recommended to receive a low priority status for an Expanded Site Inspection assignment.
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at [phone].
Sincerely,
G. Doug Rumford
Hydrogeologist
NC Superfund Section
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
MEMORANDUM
TO: File
FROM: G.Doug Rumford~
Hydrogeologist, NC Superfund
DA TE: 1/3/97
REF. 42
SUBJECT: Georgia-Pacific Corp. Hardwood Sawmill
Plymouth, Washington County, NC
NCO 000 813 592
Telecon with Doward Jones Jr.
On this day I spoke with Mr. Doward Jones Jr. (919-793-2312 w) to inquire about the
property owned by the Boy Scouts of America located adjacent to the former hardwood sawmill
and to Plymouth High School. Mr. Jones is the Assistant Scout Master for the Plymouth, NC Boy
Scout Troop. According to Mr. Jones, this parcel property was donated by the Still family to the
Boy Scouts of America some time around 1950. The Still family owned and operated the Atlas
Plywood facility which was later sold to Georgia-Pacific Corporation. The property was wooded
at the time the Boy Scouts to possession. A portion of the property was then cleared to allow the
Boy Scout Troop to construct a building which they still use as a facility for weekly meetings.
Mr. Jones also mentioned that approximately 4 acres of the Boy Scout Property were annexed .
by the city to build Plymouth High School.
ti'lfflRIT1iY¥¥'
Ref. 4 3
Report No. 93-02
HEAVY METALS IN ORGANIC-RICH MUDS OF THE ALBEMARLE SOUND ESTUARINE SYSTEM
January 1993
. I
;
ALBEMARLE-PAMLICO
ESTUARINE STUDY
NC O,,partm0nt ot
Environment, Health,
end Natural Resources
Envlronmentc/
Protection Agency
Nallonal Estuary Program .
PART E: RESULTS
·riJf:±': AREAS 01" CONCERN IN Xl!E ALBEMARLE SOUND ESTUARINE SYSTEM
. -;·-···Figure El is an index map showing the location of all area maps used in the
r.·.a-J-".' PART E: RESULTS section of this report. Table El is an outline of the specific
,regional areas and associated maps that will be the basis for presentation and
·~discussion of all analytical data through the remainder of this report.
J';;;..:.o
JJ~:}.-_:-
1 ':_.
Lower Roanoke River Area
one of the largest wood products facilities in the world is located on the
'banks of Welch Creek and the Lower. Roanoke River west of Plymouth. This
·industrial site has been operating since 1938 and today consists of 1200 acres,
"·,.,.·;:,hich includes 750 acres of industrial waste water treatment ponds (Fig. E2).
' .,,.>-'originally, all industrial waste water from the facility was discharged directly
~1iito the Roanoke River. However, during the period between the early l960"s and
c/1988, all industrial waste water was discharged directly into Welch Creek (near
r ·•· ·_WEL-4 in Fig. E2). Beginning in 1968 all industrial waste water, except cooling
~water, was processed through a secondary treatment plant before being discharged
~•?into adjacent creek waters. Since 1988, the 55 million gallons per day of
i•· · , , noncooling, industrial waste water has been discharged directly into the Roanoke
~7River through a diffuser pipe across the River bottom. Thie discharge pipe is
g£1c:icated downstream of the plant site and slightly upstream of the mouth of Welch
l1·creek.
~-:Jjt:i; In a site inspection report for North Carolina, Durway ( 1986) d·escribed
... , ..
~!h...t:1:tre~ ori-site areas where hazardous substances occur, or in the ·past have been
· J\rgenerated or disposed of. There probably-· have been ·many different sources of
~M:"~.?umerou~ contaminants from this large and complex industrial facility over the
"Jji:years. It is not known to what extent any or all of these historic sites could
t;'_.Continue to be impacting the adjacent waterways. ·. These sites include the
J.{.following:
;l_~:it~-.·
"'}'!"•
.,_l{;).·
1o, ....
--~/ ~r-
~~: ~-:J;t
.ri-f?·:
·c~;:.
~ '..,f · , ..
1. A wood treatment plant has been
chromate copper arsenate sludge
material is stored in drums and
operating since 1979 and produces a
as a by-product material. This waste
removed from the site for disposal.
2. Considerable amounts of mercury were associated with various phases of
the old chlorine plant that operated until 1968. Some waste mercury was
volatilized, some was discharged directly into the River, and some was
disposed of in the old on-site landfill.
3. An old landfill, situated on a 35 to 50 acre tract of low wetland,
received much onsite chemical waste including mercury, until 1979 w_hen
it was sealed.
Welch Creek
./ The sediments within Welch Creek, a very small southern tributary to the
• __ l\oanoke River (Fig. E2), are substantially or slightly enriched in all 15 trace
·;·;-_ elements ( Table E2). Thirteen of these trace elements are substantially enriched
~~ in multiple sample sites. Four elements have extremely high enrichments-with
~.maximum enrichment factors as follows: Cr= 156 X, Hg= 73 X, Ni= 20 X, and cu
{;_ -9 -4 X the ATM, respectively). Seven of the ten samples analyzed in Welch Creek
,e ;. 97
I
I sites with maximum enrichment factors as follows: Hg= 12.3 X, Cr= 4.0 X, As=
3.4 X, and Cu= 2.3 X the ATM. Mercury is substantially enriched (up to 12.3 X
ATM) in two samples at one site (RKE-13) off the mouth of Canaby Creek, along
''I with arsenic, cobalt, chromium, copper, manganese, tin, titanium, and zinc.
Since all other Roanoke River samples, except RKE-9 near the present industrial
site, have Very low concentrations of mercury, it is assumed that there could be
,.1 a major source of metal contamination up canaby Creek. This Creek should be
sampled and analyzed for heavy metals.
Chromium and copper are slightly to substantially enriched (up to 4.0 X and
,· 2.3 X ATM, respectively} in eight and 14 Lower Roanoke River samples,
',ii respectively. All copper enrichment occurs downstream of the paper mill's new
NPDES discharge site. Cobalt is substantially enriched in Welch Creek and is
only slightly enriched in the Roanoke River in 21 of the 26 samples •. Arsenic is
not enriched in Welch. Creek except for the surface sample at the mouth of the
:I Creek; however, it is slightly to substantially enriched in 17 samples in the
Roanoke River downstream of the paper mill discharge.
I
:I
:I
' ii
It appears that there are significant amounts of various trace elements
within the sediments of the Lower Roanoke River system. However, the general
concentrations are lower than in Welch Creek and the distribution patterns of
these trace elements are somewhat irregular. ·The Roanoke River is dominated by
rapidly fluctuating flow conditions and resulting processes of sedimentation that
range from low energy during low flow conditions to high energy during high flow
conditions. These environmental variations would cause major changes ·in
processes of sediment deposition and erosion within the Roanoke River channel and
could explain the erratic distribution patterns.
Middle and Cashie Rivers
Middle and Cashie Rivers are distributary channels of the Lower· Roanoke
River that are situated north of the main channel (Fig. E2). The Cashie River
has its own tributary drainage, however,-it is conne~ted to the Roanoke River by
the Thoroughfare Channel.
Chemical data for surface samples at three sites in the Middle River and
two sites in the outermost Cashie River are summarized in Table E4. Manganese
and titanium are enriched in all samples (up to 4.2 X and 1.9· X ATM,
respectively), while arsenic and cobalt are enriched in eight and seven of the
ten samples ( up to 2. 8 X and 2. 0 X ATM, respectively}. Chromium and vanadium are
variably enriched at both sites in the Cashie River (up to l.7 X and 1.5 X ATM,
respectively}.
Inner Albemarle sound Area
Inner Albemarle Sound extends from the mouth of the Lower Roanoke River
with broad floodplain swampforests to the west to the embayed Chowan River
estuary to the north, and eastward to the western sides of the Yeopim River on
the north and Bull Bay on the south (Fig. ES}. Inner Albemarle Sound is
relatively narrow, about 5 miles wide, compared to the middle and outer portions
further to the east, which are between 10 to 15 miles wide. Both the Roanoke and
Chowan River Drainage Basins (Fig. Bl} discharge directly into Inner Albemarle
Sound, which is an irregularly flooded, fresh water, drowned-river estuarine
system (Fig. Dl). Three water bodies are described within this area and include
the Chowan River and Edenton Bay embayed estuaries, as well as Inner Albemarle
105
. I , ,. ': ~
':.:1·
._?
:·•~
.. -
·-·,.:·~· .. ,:;--.. :,,;
;;.:-~_
~1•
··--· .;.-5
).
RECEIVED
JAN 2 31996
I
I
I
I
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY SUPERFUN0 SECTiOr:
Region IV
Environmental Services Division
College Station Road, Athens, Ga. 30613
l****MEMORANDUM******
I DATE: 01/12/96
,SUBJECT; Results
95-0294 I
of Dioxin/Furan Analysis;
GA PACIFIC CORP HDWD
PLYMOUTH NC
SAS NO: SPR
I FROM: ~harles H. Hooper l::{)V\~
Chief, Laboratory Evlluation;Quality
I TO: PAT DEROSA
Assurance Section
lttached are the results of analysis of samples collected as part of
.the subject project. Is a result of the Quality Assurance Review, certain data qualifiers
may have been placed on the data. Attached is a DATA QUALIFIER
IEPORT which explains the reasons that these qualifiers were required.
'ff you have any questions please contact me.
I ATTACHMENT
I
I
I
I
I
a
I
lo"~
' 1010
I oo \
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
DATA QUALIFIER REPORT
Project No.: 95-0294
Case No.:
SPR No. : 44854
Site Name: GA PACIFIC HDWD
Affected
Samples Analyte
All total congeners
95501
95502
95503
95504
95505
95507
95508
95509
2378 TCDD
2378 TCDF
2378 TCDD
2378 TCDD
2378 TCDD
OCDD
2378 TCDD
OCDD
2378 TCDD
123678 HxCDD
1234678 HpCDD
OCDD
2378 TCDF
OCDF
2378 TCDD
123678 HxCDD
1234678 HpCDD
OCDD
OCDF I
2378 TCDD i 123678 HxCDD
1234678 HpCDD
OCDD
2378 TCDF
OCDF
Flag
Used
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
Reason
Assumed Resp. Factors/
Cal. Stds not available
for all congeners
high spike recovery
low IS recovery
high spike recovery
high spike recovery
high spike recovery
2
high spike recovery
2
high spike recovery
2
2
2
2
2
high spike recovery
2
2
2
2
high spike recovery
2
2
2
2
2
I
I
I I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
95510 2378 TCDD J high spike recovery
1234678 HpCDD ·J 2
OCDD J 2
2378 TCDF J 2
OCDF J 2
95511 2378 TCDD J high spike recovery
95512 2378 TCDD J high spike recovery
123678 HxCDD J 2
1234678 HpCDD J 2
OCDD J 2
2378 TCDF J 2
OCDF J 2
TEQ's : The Toxic Equivalent (TEQ} represents a surrnnation of
values from the individual equivalents that are calculated for
each of the 2, 3, 7, 8 contain.ing isomers·. If 10% or greater of the
total value was from data considered to be estimated, then the
TEQ is reported as estimated {J flag}.
Abbreviation Key:
TCDD = Tetrachlorodi~nzodioxin
PeCDD = Penta 11 11 11
TCDF = Tetrachlorodibenzofuran
PeCDF = Penta 11 11 11 11
HxCDD = Hexa 11 11 11 HxCDF = Hexa 11 11 n 11
HpCDD = Hepta II i ;, 11 HpCDF = Hepta 11 11 11 11
OCDD Octa 11 11 11 OCDF = Octa 11 11 11 11
Reason Codes
l. Results lower than the minimum quantitation limit
2. Results higher than the maximum calibration limit
3. Poor precision on the 2,3,7,8-TCDF confirmation column
---- ---liiiiia &iiiil·
01/11/96 - -l!!!l!l!!!I I!!!!!! 1!!11!1 SAMPLE AND"""'im"ALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA.
DIOXIN/FURAN DATA REPORT
*** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *** ** **
**
**
**
PROJECT NO. 95-0294 SAMPLE NO. 95501 SAMPLE TYPE, SOIL
SOURCE, GA PACIFIC CORP HDWD
STATION ID, 009-SD
CASE NUMBER, 0 SAS NUMBER, SPR
PROG ELEM, NSF COLLECTED
CITY, PLYMOUTH
COLLECTION START, 06/19/95
D NUMBER, 009SD -
BY, D RUMFORD
ST, NC
1425 STOP, 00/00/00
**
**
** **
**
*** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *** NG/KG
23J
30U
3.0
20UJ
10U
20U
10U
110UJ
310U
950UJ
4000U
190J
300J
2.5U
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
2,3,7,8 TETRACHLORODIBENZODIOXIN
TETRACHLORODIBENZODIOXIN(TOTAL)
1,2,3,7,8 PENTACHLORODIBENZODIOXIN PENTACHLORODIBENZODIOXIN(TOTAL)
1,2,3,4,7,8 HEXACHLORODIBENZODIOXIN
1,2,3,6,7,8 HEXACHLORODIBENZODIOXIN
1,2,3,7,8,9 HEXACHLORODIBENZODIOXIN
HEXACHLORODIBENZODIOXIN(TOTAL)
1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HEPTACHLORODIBENZODIOXIN
HEPTACHLORODIBENZODIOXIN(TOTAL)
OCTACHLORODIBENZODIOXIN(TOTAL)
2,3,7,8 TETRACHLORODIBENZOFURAN
TETRACHLORODIBENZOFURAN(TOTAL)
1,2,3,7,8 PENTACHLORODIBENZOFURAN
***FOOTNOTES***
NG/KG
lOU
50UJ
2.5U
10U
2.5U
10U
90UJ
60U
2.5U
150UJ
90U
44
59
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
2,3,4,7,8 PENTACHLORODIBENZOFURAN
PENTACHLORODIBENZOFURAN(TOTAL)
1,2,3,4,7,8 HEXACHLORODIBENZOFURAN 1,2,3,6,7,8 HEXACHLORODIBENZOFURAN
1,2,3,7,8,9 HEXACHLORODIBENZOFURAN
2,3,4,6,7,8 HEXACHLORODIBENZOFURAN
HEXACHLORODIBENZOFURAN(TOTAL)
1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HEPTACHLORODIBENZOFURAN
1,2,3,4,7,8,9 HEPTACHLORODIBENZOFURAN
HEPTACHLORODIBENZOFURAN(TOTAL)
OCTACHLORODIBENZOFURAN(TOTAL)
TEQ(TOXIC. EQUIV. VALUE, FROM I-TEF/89)
% MOISTURE
*A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
*K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
*U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
*R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
-- --DIOXIN/FURAN DATA REPORT
*** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ••
**
**
**
**
PROJECT NO. 95-0294 SAMPLE NO. 95502 SAMPLE TYPE, SOIL
SOURCE, GA PACIFIC CORP HDWD STATION ID, 010-SD
CASE NUMBER, 0 SAS NUMBER, SPR
PROG ELEM, NSF COLLECTED
CITY, PLYMOUTH COLLECTION START, 06/19/95
D NUMBER, OlOSD
BY, D RUMFORD
ST, NC
1620 STOP, 00/00/00
==-= 01/11/96
* * * * *** ** •• •• ** ••
*** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *** NG/KG
5.8J
lOUJ
2.5U
lOUJ
2.5U
20U
lOU
70UJ 480U
980UJ
4100U
53
lOOUJ
2.SU
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
2,3,7,8 TETRACHLORODIBENZODIOXIN
TETRACHLORODIBENZODIOXIN(TOTAL)
1,2,3,7,8 PENTACHLORODIBENZODIOXIN
PENTACHLORODIBENZODIOXIN(TOTAL)
1,2,3,4,7,8 HEXACHLORODIBENZODIOXIN
1,2,3,6,7,8 HEXACHLORODIBENZODIOXIN
1,2,3,7,8,9 HEXACHLORODIBENZODIOXIN
HEXACHLORODIBENZODIOXIN(TOTAL)
1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HEPTACHLORODIBENZODIOXIN
HEPTACHLORODIBENZODIOXIN(TOTAL)
OCTACHLORODIBENZODIOXIN(TOTAL)
2,3,7,8 TETRACHLORODIBENZOFURAN
TETRACHLORODIBENZOFURAN(TOTAL)
1,2,3,7,8 PENTACHLORODIBENZOFURAN
***FOOTNOTES***
NG/KG
2.5U
20UJ
2.5U
2.5U
2.5U
2.5U
40UJ 40U
2.5U
llOUJ
llOU
11
48
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
2,3,4,7,8 PENTACHLORODIBENZOFURAN
PENTACHLORODIBENZOFURAN(TOTAL)
1,2,3,4,7,8 HEXACHLORODIBENZOFURAN
1,2,3,6,7,8 HEXACHLORODIBENZOFURAN
1,2,3,7,8,9 HEXACHLORODIBENZOFURAN
2,3,4,6,7,8 HEXACHLORODIBENZOFURAN
HEXACHLORODIBENZOFURAN(TOTAL)
1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HEPTACHLORODIBENZOFURAN
1,2,3,4,7,8,9 HEPTACHLORODIBENZOFURAN
HEPTACHLORODIBENZOFURAN(TOTAL)
OCTACHLORODIBENZOFURAN(TOTAL)
TEQ(TOXIC. EQUIV. VALUE, FROM I-TEF/89)
% MOISTURE
*A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL *K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
*U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
*R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
--·--· -----· -EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA. 01/11/96
DIOXIN/FURAN DATA REPORT
*** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *** **
**
** **
**
PROJECT NO. 95-0294 SAMPLE NO. 95503 SAMPLE TYPE, SOIL
SOURCE, GA PACIFIC CORP HDWD
STATION ID, 109-SD
CASE NUMBER, 0 SAS NUMBER, SPR
PROG ELEM, NSF COLLECTED
CITY, PLYMOUTH
COLLECTION START, 06/19/95
D NUMBER, 109SD /
BY, D RUMFORD
ST, NC
1425 STOP, 00/00/00
**
**
**
** ••
*** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * **• NG/KG
24J
40UJ
5.0J
30UJ
25U
120U
30U
490UJ
2100U
3900UJ
18000
200
380J
25U
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
2,3,7,8 TETRACHLORODIBENZODIOXIN TETRACHLORODIBENZODIOXIN(TOTAL)
1,2,3,7,8 PENTACHLORODIBENZODIOXIN
PENTACHLORODIBENZODIOXIN(TOTAL)
1,2,3,4,7,8 HEXACHLORODIBENZODIOXIN
1,2,3,6,7,8 HEXACHLORODIBENZODIOXIN
1,2,3,7,8,9 HEXACHLORODIBENZODIOXIN
HEXACHLORODIBENZODIOXIN(TOTAL)
1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HEPTACHLORODIBENZODIOXIN
HEPTACHLORODIBENZODIOXIN(TOTAL)
OCTACHLORODIBENZODIOXIN(TOTAL)
2,3,7,8 TETRACHLORODIBENZOFURAN
TETRACHLORODIBENZOFURAN(TOTAL)
1,2,3,7,8 PENTACHLORODIBENZOFURAN
***FOOTNOTES***
NG/KG
25U
250UJ
25U
25U
25U
25U
410UJ
260U
25U
780UJ
470U 64
58
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
2,3,4,7,8 PENTACHLORODIBENZOFURAN PENTACHLORODIBENZOFURAN(TOTAL)
1,2,3,4,7,8 HEXACHLORODIBENZOFURAN
1,2,3,6,7,8 HEXACHLORODIBENZOFURAN
1,2,3,7,8,9 HEXACHLORODIBENZOFURAN
2,3,4,6,7,8 HEXACHLORODIBENZOFURAN
HEXACHLORODIBENZOFURAN(TOTAL)
1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HEPTACHLORODIBENZOFURAN
1,2,3,4,7,8,9 HEPTACHLORODIBENZOFURAN
HEPTACHLORODIBENZOFURAN(TOTAL)
OCTACHLORODIBENZOFURAN(TOTAL)
TEQ(TOXIC. EQUIV. VALUE, FROM I-TEF/89)
% MOISTURE
*A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
*K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
*U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
*R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
----.. -sil'1! AN~LY~ .. MANA-NT -EM -11!!1!!!1
DIOXIN/FORAN DATA REPORT EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA.
*** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * **
**
**
**
**
PROJECT NO. 95-0294 SAMPLE NO. 95504 SAMPLE TYPE, SOIL
SOURCE, GA PACIFIC CORP HDWD
STATION ID, 001-SD
CASE NUMBER, 0 SAS NUMBER, SPR
PROG ELEM, NSF COLLECTED
CITY, PLYMOUTH
COLLECTION START, 06/20/95
D NUMBER: 00lSD,,
BY, D RUMFORD
ST, NC
1020 STOP, 00/00/00
... -01/11/96
* * * * *** **
**
**
**
**
*** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *** NG/KG
23J
30UJ 3.5
30UJ
lOU
60U
20U
250UJ
990U
2300U
5600J
200
370J
lOU
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
2,3,7,8 TETRACHLORODIBENZODIOXIN
TETRACHLORODIBENZODIOXIN(TOTAL)
1,2,3,7,8 PENTACHLORODIBENZODIOXIN
PENTACHLORODIBENZODIOXIN(TOTAL)
1,2,3,4,7,8 HEXACHLORODIBENZODIOXIN
.1,2,3,6,7,8 HEXACHLORODIBENZODIOXIN
1,2,3,7,8,9 HEXACHLORODIBENZODIOXIN
HEXACHLORODIBENZODIOXIN(TOTAL)
1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HEPTACHLORODIBENZODIOXIN
HEPTACHLORODIBENZODIOXIN(TOTAL)
OCTACHLORODIBENZODIOXIN(TOTAL)
2,3,7,8 TETRACHLORODIBENZOFURAN
TETRACHLORODIBENZOFURAN(TOTAL)
1,2,3,7,8 PENTACHLORODIBENZOFURAN
***FOOTNOTES***
NG/KG
20U
SOUJ
lOU
6.0U
2.5U
lOU
240UJ
110U
lOU
340UJ
150U
45
56
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
2,3,4,7,8 PENTACHLORODIBENZOFURAN
PENTACHLORODIBENZOFURAN(TOTAL)
1,2,3,4,7,8 HEXACHLORODIBENZOFURAN
1,2,3,6,7,8 HEXACHLORODIBENZOFURAN
1,2,3,7,8,9 HEXACHLORODIBENZOFURAN
2,3,4,6,7,8 HEXACHLORODIBENZOFURAN
HEXACHLORODIBENZOFURAN(TOTAL)
1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HEPTACHLORODIBENZOFURAN
1,2,3,4,7,8,9 HEPTACHLORODIBENZOFURAN
HEPTACHLORODIBENZOFURAN(TOTAL)
OCTACHLORODIBENZOFURAN(TOTAL)
TEQ(TOXIC. EQUIV. VALUE, FROM I-TEF/89)
% MOISTURE
*A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
*K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
*U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
*R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
-- - -DIOXIN/FURAN DATA REPORT
*** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** •• **
** **
PROJECT NO. 95-0294 SAMPLE
SOURCE, GA PACIFIC CORP HDWD
STATION ID, 002-SL
CASE NUMBER, 0
---11!!!!1 -I!!!!!!!!!! SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS,
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
l!!l!l!!I SYSTEM GA.
* * *
1!!!!111
* * * * *
NO. 95505 SAMPLE TYPE, SOIL PROG ELEM, NSF COLLECTED
CITY, PLYMOUTH
COLLECTION START, 06/20/95
SAS NUMBER, SPR D NUMBER, 002SL.,...
* * * * • • • BY, D RUMFORD
ST, NC
1155 STOP,
• • • • •
00/00/00
• •
==
01/11/96.
• • • •• •• •• •• •• ••
*** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *** NG/KG
19J
50UJ
170 650J
220
830
500
4600J
16000
32000J
92000J
30U
BOUJ
30U
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
2, 3; 7, 8 TETRACHLORODIBENZODIOXIN
TETRACHLORODIBENZODIOXIN(TOTAL)
1,2,3,7,8 PENTACHLORODIBENZODIOXIN
PENTACHLORODIBENZODIOXIN(TOTAL)
1,2,3,4,7,8 HEXACHLORODIBENZODIOXIN
1,2,3,6,7,8 HEXACHLORODIBENZODIOXIN
1,2,3,7,8,9 HEXACHLORODIBENZODIOXIN
HEXACHLORODIBENZODIOXIN(TOTAL)
1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HEPTACHLORODIBENZODIOXIN
HEPTACHLORODIBENZODIOXIN(TOTAL)
OCTACHLORODIBENZODIOXIN(TOTAL)
2,3,7,8 TETRACHLORODIBENZOFURAN
TETRACHLORODIBENZOFURAN(TOTAL)
1,2,3,7,8 PENTACHLORODIBENZOFURAN
***FOOTNOTES***
NG/KG
BOU
500UJ
59
90U
36
120
2100J
1400
81
4000J
1500
550J
50
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
2,3,4,7,8 PENTACHLORODIBENZOFURAN
PENTACHLORODIBENZOFURAN(TOTAL)
1,2,3,4,7,8 HEXACHLORODIBENZOFURAN
1,2,3,6,7,8 HEXACHLORODIBENZOFURAN
1,2,3,7,8,9 HEXACHLORODIBENZOFURAN
2,3,4,6,7,8 HEXACHLORODIBENZOFURAN
HEXACHLORODIBENZOFURAN(TOTAL)
1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HEPTACHLORODIBENZOFURAN
1,2,3,4,7,8,9 HEPTACHLORODIBENZOFURAN
HEPTACHLORODIBENZOFURAN(TOTAL)
OCTACHLORODIBENZOFURAN(TOTAL)
TEQ(TOXIC. EQUIV. VALUE, FROM I-TEF/89)
% MOISTURE
*A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
*K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
*U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT. *R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
,' - ---- -DIOXIN/FORAN DATA REPORT
I
-iiil iiiiiil iiil SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT
EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS,
iiiiii SYSTEM
GA,
lliiii liiiiiii1 == l!!l!I
01/11/96
*** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *** **
**
**
**
**
PROJECT NO, 95-0294 SAMPLE NO, 95506 SAMPLE TYPE, SOIL
SOURCE, GA PACIFIC CORP HDWD
STATION ID, 003-SL
CASE NUMBER, 0 SAS NUMBER, SPR
PROG ELEM, NSF COLLECTED
CITY, PLYMOUTH
COLLECTION START, 06/20/95 D NUMBER, 003SL,
BY, D RUMFORD
ST, NC
0950 STOP, 00/00/00
**
**
**
**
**
*** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *** NG/KG
2,5U
2,5UJ
2,5U
10UJ
2,5U
10U
10U
50UJ
220U
540UJ
4900U 2,5U
3,0UJ
2,5U
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
2,3,7,8 TETRACHLORODIBENZODIOXIN
TETRACHLORODIBENZODIOXIN(TOTAL)
1,2,3,7,8 PENTACHLORODIBENZODIOXIN
PENTACHLORODIBENZODIOXIN(TOTAL)
1,2,3,4,7,8 HEXACHLORODIBENZODIOXIN
1,2,3,6,7,8 HEXACHLORODIBENZODIOXIN
1,2,3,7,8,9 HEXACHLORODIBENZODIOXIN
HEXACHLORODIBENZODIOXIN(TOTAL)
1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HEPTACHLORODIBENZODIOXIN
HEPTACHLORODIBENZODIOXIN(TOTAL)
OCTACHLORODIBENZODIOXIN(TOTAL)
2,3,7,8 TETRACHLORODIBENZOFURAN
TETRACHLORODIBENZOFURAN(TOTAL)
1,2,3,7,8 PENTACHLORODIBENZOFURAN
***FOOTNOTES***
NG/KG
2,SU
10UJ
2,5U
2,5U
2,5U
2,5U
30UJ
20U 2,5U
50UJ
30U
0
22
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
2,3,4,7,8 PENTACHLORODIBENZOFURAN
PENTACHLORODIBENZOFURAN(TOTAL)
1,2,3,4,7,8 HEXACHLORODIBENZOFURAN
1,2,3,6,7,8 HEXACHLORODIBENZOFURAN
1,2,3,7,8,9 HEXACHLORODIBENZOFURAN
2,3,4,6,7,8 HEXACHLORODIBENZOFURAN
HEXACHLORODIBENZOFURAN(TOTAL)
1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HEPTACHLORODIBENZOFURAN
1,2,3,4,7,8,9 HEPTACHLORODIBENZOFURAN
HEPTACHLORODIBENZOFURAN(TOTAL)
OCTACHLORODIBENZOFURAN(TOTAL)
TEQ(TOXIC, EQUIV, VALUE, FROM I-TEF/89)
% MOISTURE
*A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
*K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN *U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED, THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT, *R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE, COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT, RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION,
-- - - ------SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT -SYSTEM -- -- --EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA. 01/11/96
DIOXIN/FURAN DATA REPORT
*** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *** **
**
**
**
**
PROJECT NO. 95-0294 SAMPLE NO. 95507 SAMPLE TYPE, SOIL SOURCE, GA PACIFIC CORP HDWD
STATION ID, 004-SL
CASE NUMBER, 0 SAS NUMBER, SPR
PROG ELEM, NSF COLLECTED
CITY, PLYMOUTH
COLLECTION START, 06/20/95
D NUMBER: 004SL ,,,
BY, D RUMFORD
ST, NC
1125 STOP, 00/00/00
**
**
**
**
**
*** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *** NG/KG
82J
260J
1500 22000J
5000
43000J
7400
160000J
320000J
620000J
370000J
300
2600J 480
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
2,3,7,8 TETRACHLORODIBENZODIOXIN
TETRACHLORODIBENZODIOXIN(TOTAL)
1,2,3,7,8 PENTACHLORODIBENZODIOXIN
PENTACHLORODIBENZODIOXIN(TOTAL)
1,2,3,4,7,8 HEXACHLORODIBENZODIOXIN
1,2,3,6,7,8 HEXACHLORODIBENZODIOXIN
1,2,3,7,8,9 HEXACHLORODIBENZODIOXIN
HEXACHLORODIBENZODIOXIN(TOTAL)
1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HEPTACHLORODIBENZODIOXIN
HEPTACHLORODIBENZODIOXIN(TOTAL)
OCTACHLORODIBENZODIOXIN(TOTAL)
2,3,7,8 TETRACHLORODIBENZOFURAN
TETRACHLORODIBENZOFURAN(TOTAL)
1,2,3,7,8 PENTACHLORODIBENZOFURAN
***FOOTNOTES***
NG/KG
86
33000J
3600
1700U
1400
3700
140000J
81000U
10000
9800J
90000J
llOOOJ
18
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
2,3,4,7,8 PENTACHLORODIBENZOFURAN
PENTACHLORODIBENZOFURAN(TOTAL)
1,2,3,4,7,8 HEXACHLORODIBENZOFURAN
1,2,3,6,7,8 HEXACHLORODIBENZOFURAN
1,2,3,7,8,9 HEXACHLORODIBENZOFURAN
2,3,4,6,7,8 HEXACHLORODIBENZOFURAN
HEXACHLORODIBENZOFURAN(TOTAL)
1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HEPTACHLORODIBENZOFURAN
1,2,3,4,7,8,9 HEPTACHLORODIBENZOFURAN
HEPTACHLORODIBENZOFURAN(TOTAL)
OCTACHLORODIBENZOFURAN(TOTAL)
TEQ(TOXIC. EQUIV. VALUE, FROM I-TEF/89)
% MOISTURE
*A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
*K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
*U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
*R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
. !!!!!. == liiiiil liiii -----EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA. 01/11/96
DIOXIN/FURAN DATA REPORT
*** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *** **
**
**
**
**
PROJECT NO. 95-0294 SAMPLE NO. 95508 SAMPLE TYPE, SOIL SOURCE, GA PACIFIC CORP HDWD
STATION ID, 005-SL
CASE NUMBER, 0 SAS NUMBER, SPR
PROG ELEM, NSF COLLECTED
CITY, PLYMOUTH
COLLECTION START, 06/20/95
D NUMBER, OOSSL -
BY, D RUMFORD
ST, NC
1020 STOP, 00/00/00
**
**
**
**
**
*** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *** NG/KG
180J 420J
2900
22000J
4100
4SOOOJ
11000
180000J
120000J
230000J
360000J
660
6500J
910
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
2,3,7,8 TETRACHLORODIBENZODIOXIN TETRACHLORODIBENZODIOXIN(TOTAL)
1,2,3,7,8 PENTACHLORODIBENZODIOXIN
PENTACHLORODIBENZODIOXIN(TOTAL)
1,2,3,4,7,8 HEXACHLORODIBENZODIOXIN
1,2,3,6,7,8 HEXACHLORODIBENZODIOXIN
1,2,3,7,8,9 HEXACHLORODIBENZODIOXIN
HEXACHLORODIBENZODIOXIN(TOTAL)
1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HEPTACHLORODIBENZODIOXIN
HEPTACHLORODIBENZODIOXIN(TOTAL)
OCTACHLORODIBENZODIOXIN(TOTAL)
2,3,7,8 TETRACHLORODIBENZOFURAN
TETRACHLORODIBENZOFURAN(TOTAL)
1,2,3,7,8 PENTACHLORODIBENZOFURAN
***FOOTNOTES***
NG/KG
4100
80000J
2900
4100U
1900
6100
140000J
46000U
4000
3800J
120000J
13000J
41
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
2,3,4,7,8 PENTACHLORODIBENZOFURAN PENTACHLORODIBENZOFURAN(TOTAL)
1,2,3,4,7,8 HEXACHLORODIBENZOFURAN
1,2,3,6,7,8 HEXACHLORODIBENZOFURAN
1,2,3,7,8,9 HEXACHLORODIBENZOFURAN 2,3,4,6,7,8 HEXACHLORODIBENZOFURAN
HEXACHLORODIBENZOFURAN(TOTAL)
1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HEPTACHLORODIBENZOFURAN
1,2,3,4,7,8,9 HEPTACHLORODIBENZOFURAN
HEPTACHLORODIBENZOFURAN(TOTAL)
OCTACHLORODIBENZOFURAN(TOTAL)
TEQ(TOXIC. EQUIV. VALUE, FROM I-TEF/89)
% MOISTURE
*A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
*K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN *U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
*R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFic;ATION.
!!!!I i:;;;a liiii
DIOXIN/FURAN DATA REPORT -iiiii - -
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA. -- -- --01/11/96
*** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *· * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *· * * * *** **
**
**
**
**
PROJECT NO. 95-0294 SAMPLE NO. 95509 SAMPLE TYPE, SOIL SOURCE, GA PACIFIC CORP HDWD STATION ID, 006-SL
CASE NUMBER, 0 SAS NUMBER, SPR
PROG ELEM, NSF COLLECTED
CITY, PLYMOUTH
COLLECTION START, 06/20/95
D NUMBER, 006SL /
BY, D RUMFORD
ST, NC
1040 STOP, 00/00/00
**
** •• ••
**
*** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *** NG/KG
1100J
4200J
18000
200000J
50000
1100000J ·
99000
3000000J
8300000J
1.4E7
2.6E7
8000J
32000J 18000
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
2,3,7,8 TETRACHLORODIBENZODIOXIN
TETRACHLORODIBENZODIOXIN(TOTAL)
1,2,3,7,8 PENTACHLORODIBENZODIOXIN
PENTACHLORODIBENZODIOXIN(TOTAL)
1,2,3,4,7,8 HEXACHLORODIBENZODIOXIN
1,2,3,6,7,8 HEXACHLORODIBENZODIOXIN
1,2,3,7,8,9 HEXACHLORODIBENZODIOXIN
HEXACHLORODIBENZODIOXIN(TOTAL)
1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HEPTACHLORODIBENZODIOXIN
HEPTACHLORODIBENZODIOXIN(TOTAL)
OCTACHLORODIBENZODIOXIN(TOTAL)
2,3,7,8 TETRACHLORODIBENZOFURAN
TETRACHLORODIBENZOFURAN(TOTAL) 1,2,3,7,8 PENTACHLORODIBENZOFURAN
***FOOTNOTES***
NG/KG
37000
460000J
100000 42000U
55000
86000
3700000J
2200000U
230000
220000J
1. 3E7
300000J
56
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
2,3,4,7,8 PENTACHLORODIBENZOFURAN
PENTACHLORODIBENZOFURAN(TOTAL)
1,2,3,4,7,8 HEXACHLORODIBENZOFURAN 1,2,3,6,7,8 HEXACHLORODIBENZOFURAN
1,2,3,7,8,9 HEXACHLORODIBENZOFURAN
2,3,4,6,7,8 HEXACHLORODIBENZOFURAN
HEXACHLORODIBENZOFURAN(TOTAL)
1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HEPTACHLORODIBENZOFURAN
1,2,3,4,7,8,9 HEPTACHLORODIBENZOFURAN
HEPTACHLORODIBENZOFURAN(TOTAL) OCTACHLORODIBENZOFURAN(TOTAL)
TEQ(TOXIC. EQUIV. VALUE, FROM I-TEF/89)
% MOISTURE
*A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
*K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
*U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
*R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
;;;;;a liiiiiil liiii -· ---- - - -
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM ----DIOXIN/FURAN DATA REPORT EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA. 01/11/96
*** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *· * * * *** •• •• •• •• ••
PROJECT NO. 95-0294 SAMPLE NO. 95510 SAMPLE TYPE, SOIL SOURCE, GA PACIFIC CORP HDWD
STATION ID, 007-SL
CASE NUMBER, 0 SAS NUMBER, SPR
PROG ELEM, NSF COLLECTED CITY, PLYMOUTH
COLLECTION START, 06/20/95
D NUMBER, 007SL'
BY, D RUMFORD
ST, NC
0900 STOP, 00/00/00
•• •• •• •• • • *** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *** NG/KG
2200J
4300J
28000
140000J
67000
990000
140000
2900000J
8400000J
1. SE?
2.9E7
13000J
62000J
20000
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
2,3,7,8 TETRACHLORODIBENZODIOXIN
TETRACHLORODIBENZODIOXIN(TOTAL)
1,2,3,7,8 PENTACHLORODIBENZODIOXIN PENTACHLORODIBENZODIOXIN(TOTAL)
1,2,3,4,7,8 HEXACHLORODIBENZODIOXIN
1,2,3,6,7,8 HEXACHLORODIBENZODIOXIN
1,2,3,7,8,9 HEXACHLORODIBENZODIOXIN
HEXACHLORODIBENZODIOXIN(TOTAL)
1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HEPTACHLORODIBENZODIOXIN
HEPTACHLORODIBENZODIOXIN(TOTAL)
OCTACHLORODIBENZODIOXIN(TOTAL)
2,3,7,8 TETRACHLORODIBENZOFURAN
TETRACHLORODIBENZOFURAN(TOTAL)
1,2,3,7,8 PENTACHLORODIBENZOFURAN
***FOOTNOTES***
NG/KG
40000
SOOOOOJ
94000
47000
56000
79000
3200000J
1800000U
200000
6000000J
1. 3E7
310000J
57
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
2,3,4,7,8 PENTACHLORODIBENZOFURAN PENTACHLORODIBENZOFURAN(TOTAL)
1,2,3,4,7,8 HEXACHLORODIBENZOFURAN
1,2,3,6,7,8 HEXACHLORODIBENZOFURAN
1,2,3,7,8,9 HEXACHLORODIBENZOFURAN
2,3,4,6,7,8 HEXACHLORODIBENZOFURAN
HEXACHLORODIBENZOFURAN(TOTAL)
1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HEPTACHLORODIBENZOFURAN
1,2,3,4,7,8,9 HEPTACHLORODIBENZOFURAN
HEPTACHLORODIBENZOFURAN(TOTAL)
.OCTACHLORODIBENZOFURAN(TOTAL) TEQ(TOXIC. EQUIV. VALUE, FROM I-TEF/89)
% MOISTURE
*A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL *K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN *U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
*R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
--I!!!!! 9= sffl mffiALYS.MANA-~ ~EM -. -. ---.. EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA. 01/11/96
DIOXIN/FURAN DATA REPORT
*** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *** **
**
**
**
**
PROJECT NO. 95-0294 SAMPLE NO. 95511 SAMPLE TYPE, SOIL
SOURCE, GA PACIFIC CORP HDWD
STATION ID, 101-SD
CASE NUMBER, 0 SAS NUMBER, SPR
PROG ELEM, NSF COLLECTED
CITY, PLYMOUTH
COLLECTION START, 06/20/95
D NUMBER, 101SD-
BY, D RUMFORD
ST, NC
1020 STOP, 00/00/00
**
**
**
**
**
*** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *** NG/KG
13J
20UJ
3.4
30UJ
5.3
70U
20U
240UJ
1400U
2600UJ
5100U 120
230J
10U
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
2,3,7,8 TETRACHLORODIBENZODIOXIN
TETRACHLORODIBENZODIOXIN(TOTAL)
1,2,3,7,8 PENTACHLORODIBENZODIOXIN PENTACHLORODIBENZODIOXIN(TOTAL)
1,2,3,4,7,8 HEXACHLORODIBENZODIOXIN
1,2,3,6,7,8 HEXACHLORODIBENZODIOXIN
1,2,3,7,8,9 HEXACHLORODIBENZODIOXIN
HEXACHLORODIBENZODIOXIN(TOTAL)
1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HEPTACHLORODIBENZODIOXIN
HEPTACHLORODIBENZODIOXIN(TOTAL)
OCTACHLORODIBENZODIOXIN(TOTAL)
2,3,7,8 TETRACHLORODIBENZOFURAN
TETRACHLORODIBENZOFURAN(TOTAL)
1,2,3,7,8 PENTACHLORODIBENZOFURAN
***FOOTNOTES***
NG/KG
10U
40UJ
2.5U 2.5U
10U
10U
250UJ
180U
10U
600UJ
280U 27
56
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
2,3,4,7,8 PENTACHLORODIBENZOFURAN
PENTACHLORODIBENZOFURAN(TOTAL)
1,2,3,4,7,8 HEXACHLORODIBENZOFURAN
1,2,3,6,7,8 HEXACHLORODIBENZOFURAN
1,2,3,7,8,9 HEXACHLORODIBENZOFURAN
2,3,4,6,7,8 HEXACHLORODIBENZOFURAN
HEXACHLORODIBENZOFURAN(TOTAL)
1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HEPTACHLORODIBENZOFURAN
1,2,3,4,7,8,9 HEPTACHLORODIBENZOFURAN
HEPTACHLORODIBENZOFURAN(TOTAL)
OCTACHLORODIBENZOFURAN(TOTAL)
TEQ(TOXIC. EQUIV. VALUE, FROM I-TEF/89)
% MOISTURE
*A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
*K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
*U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
*R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
-I!!!!!! !II!! -. == Iii.a iiiii -liiiil. -SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM - --·-- -DIOXIN/FURAN DATA REPORT EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA. 01/11/96
*** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *-* * * *** •• •• •• •• ••
PROJECT NO. 95-0294 SAMPLE NO. 95512 SAMPLE TYPE, SOIL
SOURCE, GA PACIFIC CORP HDWD
STATION ID, 107-SL
CASE NUMBER, 0 SAS NUMBER, SPR
PROG ELEM, NSF COLLECTED
CITY, PLYMOUTH
COLLECTION START, 06/20/95
D NUMBER, 107SL -
BY, D RUMFORD
ST, NC
0900 STOP, 00/00/00
•• •• •• •• • • *** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *** NG/KG
1400J
8100J
20000
120000J
52000 1200000J
110000
3200000J
l.OE7
1. 6E7
3. 9E7
16000J
95000J
23000
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
2,3,7,8 TETRACHLORODIBENZODIOXIN
TETRACHLORODIBENZODIOXIN(TOTAL)
1,2,3,7,8 PENTACHLORODIBENZODIOXIN PENTACHLORODIBENZODIOXIN(TOTAL) 1,2,3,4,7;8 HEXACHLORODIBENZODIOXIN
1,2,3,6,7,8 HEXACHLORODIBENZODIOXIN
1,2,3,7,8,9 HEXACHLORODIBENZODIOXIN
HEXACHLORODIBENZODIOXIN(TOTAL)
1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HEPTACHLORODIBENZODIOXIN HEPTACHLORODIBENZODIOXIN(TOTAL)
OCTACHLORODIBENZODIOXIN(TOTAL)
2,3,7,8 TETRACHLORODIBENZOFURAN
TETRACHLORODIBENZOFURAN(TOTAL)
1,2,3,7,8 PENTACHLORODIBENZOFURAN
***FOOTNOTES***
NG/KG
70000
750000J
95000
40000U
60000
79000
3600000J
2000000U
·200000
7800000J
l.7E7
370000J
58
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
2,3,4,7,8 PENTACHLORODIBENZOFURAN
PENTACHLORODIBENZOFURAN(TOTAL) 1,2,3,4,7,8 HEXACHLORODIBENZOFURAN
1,2,3,6,7,8 HEXACHLORODIBENZOFURAN
1,2,3,7,8,9 HEXACHLORODIBENZOFURAN
2,3,4,6,7,8 HEXACHLORODIBENZOFURAN
HEXACHLORODIBENZOFURAN(TOTAL)
1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HEPTACHLORODIBENZOFURAN
1,2,3,4,7,8,9 HEPTACHLORODIBENZOFURAN
HEPTACHLORODIBENZOFURAN(TOTAL)
OCTACHLORODIBENZOFURAN(TOTAL)
TEQ(TOXIC. EQUIV. VALUE, FROM I-TEF/89)
% MOISTURE
*A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL *K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
*U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
*R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
I
I
I
I
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Region IV
Environmental Services Division
College Station Road, Athens, Ga. 30613
l***MEMORANDUM******
I DATE: 08/16/95
SUBJECT:
I
D FROM:
Results
95-0293
of Extractable Organic Analysis;
GA PACIFIC CORP HDWD
PLYMOUTH NC
~SE NO: 23679
ar es·H~~'jv
hief, Laboratory Evaluation/Quality Assurance Section
u
u
TO: PAT DEROSA
Attached are the results of analysis of samples collected as part of
jfe subject project.
It a result of the Quality Assurance Review, certain data qualifiers
may have been placed on the data. Attached is a DATA QUALIFIER
'PORT which explains the reasons that these qualifiers were required.
If you have any questions please contact me.
I
I
I
I
I
ATTACHMENT
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
g
D
D
I
ORGANIC DATA QUALIFIER REPORT
Case Number 23679 Project Number 95-0293 SAS Number
Site ID. Georgia Pacific Corp HDWD, Plymouth, NC
Affected Samples
Volatiles
all samples
95446
95447,95453,
95455
Extractables
95445,95446
95447,95450,
95452,95454,
95456, 95458, I
95460,95462
95448
95451
oo-Z 95453,95455,
95459
95455
95457
95461
Compound or Fraction
chloromethane
benzene
toluene
chlorobenzene
2-butanone
all compounds
pyrene
benzo(g,h,i)perylene
pyrene di-n-octylphthalate
benzo(b/k)fluoranthene
benzo(a)pyrene
indeno(l,2,3-cd)pyrene
dibenz(a,h)anthracene
benzo(g,h,t)perylene
pyrene
benzo(b/k)fluoranthene
benzo(g,h,i)perylene
fluoranthene
pyrene
benzo(b/k)fluoranthene
benzo(g,h,i)perylene
benzo(a)pyrene
chrysene
phenanthrene
fluoranthene
pyrene
chrysene
benzo(a)pyrene
indeno(l,2,3-cd)pyrene
benzo(g,h,i)perylene
fluoranthene
pyrene
chrysene
benzo(b/k)fluoranthene
benzo(a)pyrene
benzo(g,h,i)perylene
R
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
Flag
Used
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
Reason
unacceptable PE sample recovery
< quantitation limit
< quantitation limit
< quantitation limit
< quantitation limit
exceeded extraction holding time
low PE sample recovery
low PE sample recovery
low PE sample recovery
low internal standard recovery
low internal standard recovery
low internal standard recovery
low internal standard recovery
low internal standard recovery
low internal .standard recovery
< quantitation limit
< quantitation limit
low PE sample recovery
< quantitation limit
< quantitation limit
< quantitation limit
low PE sample recovery
< quantitation limit
< quantitation limit
< quantitation limit
< qunatitation limit
< quantitation limit
< quantitation limit
< quantitation limit
< quantitation limit
< quantitation limit
< quantitation limit
< quantitation limit
< quantitation limit
< quantitation limit
< quantitation limit
low PE sample recovery
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
D
D
I
I
ORGANIC DATA QUALIFIER REPORT
Case Number 23679
Affected Samples Compound or Fraction
Pesticides
all samples '
95445,95446
95447
95454
95455
95457
95459
aroclor-1016
alpha-bhc
delta-bhc
gamma-bhc
4,4'-DDE
4,4' -DDT
beta-bhc
4,4'-DDE
delta-bhc
gamma-bhc
endrin aldehyde
4,4':DDE
Project Number 95-0293
Flag
Used
R
C
C
C
J
J
J
J
J
N
J
J
J
N
Reason
unacceptable PE sample recovery
GC/MS confirmed
GC/MS confirmed
GC/MS confirmed
< quantitation limit
< quantitation limit
< quantitation limit
< quantitation limit
< quantitation limit
difference in column
quantitations
< quantitation limit < quantitation limit
< quantitation limit
difference in column
quantitations
EXTRACTABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM ·
EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA. 08/15/95
*** *. * * * * * * *. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *. * *** **
**
** **
PROJECT NO. 95-0293 SAMPLE NO. 95445
SOURCE, GA PACIFIC CORP HDWD
STATION ID, 007-SL /
** CASE NO.: 23679
SAMPLE TYPE, SOIL
SAS NO.,
PROG ELEM, NSF COLLECTED
CITY, PLYMOUTH
COLLECTION START, 06/20/95
D. NO., KA86
BY, D RUMFORD
ST, NC
0900 STOP, 00/00/00
** **
** **
**
*** * * * *. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *** UG/KG
24000UJ
24000UJ
24000UJ
24000UJ
24000UJ
24000UJ
24000UJ
24000UJ
24000UJ
24000UJ
24000UJ
24000UJ
24000UJ
24000UJ
24000UJ
24000UJ
24000UJ
4800J
24000UJ
24000UJ
24000UJ
24000UJ
24000UJ
24000UJ
2800J
6800J
24000UJ
61000UJ 24000UJ
24000UJ
24000UJ
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
PHENOL
BIS(2-CHLOROETHYL) ETHER
2-CHLOROPHENOL
1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE 1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE
1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE
2-METHYLPHENOL 2,2'-CHLOROISOPROPYLETHER
(3-AND/OR 4-)METHYLPHENOL
N-NITROSODI-N-PROPYLAMINE
HEXACHLOROETHANE
NITROBENZENE
ISO PHO RONE
2-NITROPHENOL
2,4-DIMETHYLPHENOL
BIS(2-CHLOROETHOXY) METHANE
2,4-DICHLOROPHENOL
1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE
NAPHTHALENE
4-CHLOROANILINE
HEXACHLOROBUTADIENE
4-CHLOR0-3-METHYLPHENOL
2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE
HEXACHLOROCYCLOPENTADIENE (HCCP)
2,4,6-TRICHLOROPHENOL
2,4,5-TRICHLOROPHENOL
2-CHLORONAPHTHALENE
2-NITROANILINE
DIMETHYL PHTHALATE
ACENAPHTHYLENE
2,6-DINITROTOLUENE
***REMARKS***
EXCESSIVE HOLDING TIME
***FOOTNOTES***
UG/KG
61000UJ 24000UJ
61000UJ
61000UJ
24000UJ
24000UJ
24000UJ
24000UJ
24000UJ
61000UJ 61000UJ
24000UJ
24000UJ
24000UJ
2l+E06J
24000UJ
24000UJ
24000UJ
24000UJ
9400J
97000J
24000UJ 24000UJ
24000UJ
16000J
24000UJ
24000UJ
24000UJ 24000UJ
24000UJ
24000UJ
24000UJ
59
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
3-NITROANILINE ACENAPHTHENE
2,4-DINITROPHENOL
4-NITROPHENOL
DIBENZOFURAN
2,4-DINITROTOLUENE
DIETHYL PHTHALATE
4-CHLOROPHENYL PHENYL ETHER
FLUORENE
4-NITROANILINE
2-METHYL-4,6-DINITROPHENOL
N-NITROSODIPHENYLAMINE/DIPHENYLAMINE
4-BROMOPHENYL PHENYL ETHER
HEXACHLOROBENZENE (HCB)
PENTACHLOROPHENOL
PHENANTHRENE
ANTHRACENE
CARBAZOLE
DI-N-BUTYLPHTHALATE
FLUORANTHENE
PYRENE BENZYL BUTYL PHTHALATE
3,3'-DICHLOROBENZIDINE
BENZO(A)ANTHRACENE
CHRYSENE
BIS(2-ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE
DI-N-OCTYLPHTHALATE BENZO(B AND/OR K)FLUORANTHENE
BENZO-A-PYRENE
INDENO (1,2,3-CD) PYRENE
DIBENZO(A,H)ANTHRACENE
BENZO(GHI)PERYLENE
PERCENT MOISTURE
***REMARKS***
*A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
*K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
*U-M!>.TERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT. *R0 QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
--l!!!!!!!I l!!!l!I 1!!!!!111 liiliil ----- -- ---
EXTRACTABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA. 08/15/95
*** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *** **
**
**
**
PROJECT NO. 95-0293 SAMPLE NO. 95446
SOURCE, GA PACIFIC CORP HDWD
STATION ID, 107-SL
** CASE NO.: 23679
SAMPLE TYPE, SOIL
SAS NO.,
PROG ELEM, NSF COLLECTED
CITY, PLYMOUTH
COLLECTION START, 06/20/95
D. NO., KA87
BY, D RUMFORD
ST, NC
0900 STOP, 00/00/00
** **
**
**
**
*** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *** UG/KG
24000UJ
24000UJ
24000UJ
24000UJ
24000UJ
24000UJ 24000UJ
24000UJ 24000UJ
24000UJ
·24000UJ
24000UJ
24000UJ
24000UJ
24000UJ
24000UJ
24000UJ
24000UJ
24000UJ
24000UJ 24000UJ
24000UJ
24000UJ
24000UJ
24000UJ
61000UJ
24000UJ
61000UJ
24000UJ
24000UJ
24000UJ
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
PHENOL
BIS(2-CHLOROETHYL) ETHER
2-CHLOROPHENOL 1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE
1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE
1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE
2-METHYLPHENOL
2,2'-CHLOROISOPROPYLETHER
(3-AND/OR 4-)METHYLPHENOL
N-NITROSODI-N-PROPYLAMINE
HEXACHLOROETHANE
NITROBENZENE
ISOPHORONE 2-NITROPHENOL
2,4-DIMETHYLPHENOL
BIS(2-CHLOROETHOXY) METHANE
2,4-DICHLOROPHENOL
1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE
NAPHTHALENE
4-CHLOROANILINE
HEXACHLOROBUTADIENE 4-CHLOR0-3-METHYLPHENOL
2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE
HEXACHLOROCYCLOPENTADIENE (HCCP)
2,4,6-TRICHLOROPHENOL
2,4,5-TRICHLOROPHENOL
2-CHLORONAPHTHALENE
2-NITROANILINE
DIMETHYL PHTHALATE
ACENAPHTHYLENE
2,6-DINITROTOLUENE
***REMARKS***
EXCESSIVE HOLDING TIME
***FOOTNOTES***
UG/KG
61000UJ
24000UJ
61000UJ
61000UJ
24000UJ
24000UJ
24000UJ
24000UJ
24000UJ
61000UJ
61000UJ.
24000UJ
24000UJ
24000UJ
24+E06J
24000UJ
24000UJ
24000UJ
24000UJ
24000UJ
6800J
24000UJ 24000UJ
24000UJ
24000UJ
24000UJ
24000UJ 24000UJ
24000UJ
24000UJ
24000UJ
24000UJ
63
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
3-NITROANILINE
ACENAPHTHENE 2,4-DINITROPHENOL
4-NITROPHENOL
DIBENZOFURAN
2,4-DINITROTOLUENE DIETHYL PHTHALATE
4-CHLOROPHENYL PHENYL ETHER FLUORENE
4-NITROANILINE
2-METHYL-4,6-DINITROPHENOL
N-NITROSODIPHENYLAMINE/DIPHENYLAMINE
4-BROMOPHENYL PHENYL ETHER HEXACHLOROBENZENE (HCB)
PENTACHLOROPHENOL
PHENANTHRENE ANTHRACENE .
CARBAZOLE
DI-N-BUTYLPHTHALATE
FLUORANTHENE
PYRENE BENZYL BUTYL PHTHALATE 3,3'-DICHLOROBENZIDINE
BENZO(A)ANTHRACENE
CHRYSENE
BIS(2-ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE
DI-N-OCTYLPHTHALATE BENZO(B AND/OR K)FLUORANTHENE
BENZO-A-PYRENE
INDENO (1,2,3-CD) PYRENE
DIBENZO(A,H)ANTHRACENE
BENZO(GHI)PERYLENE
PERCENT MOISTURE
***REMARKS***
*A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
*K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN *U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
*R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
-I!!!!!!! l!!!!!!!I - - ------
EXTRACTABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA. 08/15/95
*** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * •• * * * * * *. * * * * * * * * * * *. * * * * * * * * * * * *** •• •• •• ••
PROJECT NO. 95-0293 SAMPLE NO. 95447
SOURCE, GA PACIFIC CORP HDWD
STATION ID, 003-SL ~
** CASE NO.: 23679
SAMPLE TYPE, SOIL
SAS NO.,
PROG ELEM, NSF COLLECTED
CITY, PLYMOUTH
COLLECTION START, 06/20/95
D. NO., KA88
BY, D RUMFORD
ST, NC
0950 STOP, 00/00/00
•• ** • • ** •• *** * * * * * * ••• * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *. *** UG/KG
410U
410U
410U
410U
410U
410U
410U 410U
410U
410U
410U
410U
410U
410U
410U
410U
410U
410U
410U
410U
410U 410U
410U
410U
410U
1000U 410U
1000U
410U
410U
410U
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
PHENOL
BIS(2-CHLOROETHYL) ETHER
2-CHLOROPHENOL
1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE
1,.4 -DICHLOROBENZENE
1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE
2-METHYLPHENOL
2,2'-CHLOROISOPROPYLETHER
(3-AND/OR 4-)METHYLPHENOL
N-NITROSODI-N-PROPYLAMINE
HEXACHLOROETHANE
NITROBENZENE
ISO PHO RONE 2-NITROPHENOL
2,4-DIMETHYLPHENOL
BIS(2-CHLOROETHOXY) METHANE
2,4-DICHLOROPHENOL
1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE
NAPHTHALENE
4-CHLOROANILINE
HEXACHLOROBUTADIENE
4-CHLOR0-3-METHYLPHENOL
2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE
HEXACHLOROCYCLOPENTADIENE (HCCP)
2,4,6-TRICHLOROPHENOL
2,4,5-TRICHLOROPHENOL
2-CHLORONAPHTHALENE
2-NITROANILINE DIMETHYL PHTHALATE
ACENAPHTHYLENE
2,6-DINITROTOLUENE
***FOOTNOTES***
UG/KG
1000U 4100
10000
10000
4100
4100
4100
4100
4100
10000
10000
4100
4100
4100
24000
4100
4100
4100
4100
4100
410UJ
4100 410U
4100
4100
4100
4100
4100
4100
410U
4100
410UJ
21
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
3-NITROANILINE
ACENAPHTHENE
2,4-DINITROPHENOL
4-NITROPHENOL
DIBENZOFURAN
2,4-DINITROTOLUENE
DIETHYL PHTHALATE
4-CHLOROPHENYL PHENYL ETHER
FLUORENE
4 -NITROANILINE
2-METHYL-4,6-DINITROPHENOL
N-NITROSODIPHENYLAMINE/DIPHENYLAMINE 4-BROMOPHENYL PHENYL ETHER HEXACHLOROBENZENE (HCB)
PENTACHLOROPHENOL
PHENANTHRENE
ANTHRACENE
CARBAZOLE
DI-N-BUTYLPHTHALATE
FLUORANTHENE
PYRENE
BENZYL BUTYL PHTHALATE
3,3'-DICHLOROBENZIDINE
BENZO(A)ANTHRACENE
CHRYSENE
BIS(2-ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE
DI-N-OCTYLPHTHALATE
BENZO(B AND/OR K)FLUORANTHENE
BENZO-A-PYRENE
INDENO (1,2,3-CD) PYRENE
DIBENZO(A,H)ANTHRACENE
BENZO(GHI)PERYLENE
PERCENT MOISTURE
*A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
*K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
*U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT. *R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
-l!!!!!!!I l!!!!!!l!I 111!!!!!!1 l!!!l!!I == . ==. ;;;a liiiil llii
EXTRACTABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA. 08/15/95
*** * * * * * * •• * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *** •• •• •• ••
PROJECT NO. 95-0293 SAMPLE NO. 95448
SOURCE, GA PACIFIC CORP HDWD
STATION ID, 005-SL,
** CASE NO.: 23679
SAMPLE TYPE, SOIL
SAS NO.,
PROG ELEM, NSF COLLECTED
CITY, PLYMOUTH
COLLECTION START, 06/20/95
D. NO., KA89
BY, D RUMFORD
ST, NC
1020 STOP, 00/00/00
•• •• • • •• ••
*** * * * * * *. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *** UG/KG
550U
550U
550U
550U
550U
550U
550U
550U
550U
550U 550U
550U
550U
550U
550U
550U 550U
550U
550U
550U
550U 550U
550U
550U
550U
1400U
550U
1400U
550U
550U.
550U
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
PHENOL
BIS(2-CHLOROETHYL) ETHER
2-CHLOROPHENOL
1, 3-DICHLOROBENZENE.
1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE
1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE
2-METHYLPHENOL
2,2'-CHLOROISOPROPYLETHER
(3-AND/OR 4-)METHYLPHENOL
N-NITROSODI-N-PROPYLAMINE HEXACHLOROETHANE
NITROBENZENE
ISOPHORONE
2-NITROPHENOL
2,4-DIMETHYLPHENOL
BIS(2-CHLOROETHOXY) METHANE
2,4-DICHLOROPHENOL
1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE
NAPHTHALENE
4-CHLOROANILINE
HEXACHLOROBUTADIENE 4-CHLOR0-3-METHYLPHENOL
2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE
HEXACHLOROCYCLOPENTADIENE (HCCP)
2,4,6-TRICHLOROPHENOL
2,4,5-TRICHLOROPHENOL
2-CHLORONAPHTHALENE
2-NITROANILINE
DIMETHYL PHTHALATE
ACENAPHTHYLENE
2,6-DINITROTOLUENE
***FOOTNOTES***
UG/KG
1400U
550U
1400U
1400U
550U
550U
550U 550U
550U
1400U
1400U
550U
550U
550U 1400U
550U
550U
550U
550U
550U 550UJ
550U
550U
550U 550U
550U
-550UJ
550UJ
550UJ
550UJ
550UJ 550UJ
40
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
3-NITROANILINE
ACENAPHTHENE
2,4-DINITROPHENOL
4-NITROPHENOL
DIBENZOFURAN
2,4-DINITROTOLUENE
DIETHYL PHTHALATE
4-CHLOROPHENYL PHENYL ETHER
FLUORENE
4-NITROANILINE
2-METHYL-4,6-DINITROPHENOL
N-NITROSODIPHENYLAMINE/DIPHENYLAMINE
4-BROMOPHENYL PHENYL ETHER
HEXACHLOROBENZENE (HCB)
PENTACHLOROPHENOL PHENANTHRENE
ANTHRACENE
CARBAZOLE
DI-N-BUTYLPHTHALATE
FLUORANTHENE
PYRENE BENZYL BUTYL PHTHALATE
3,3'-DICHLOROBENZIDINE
BENZO(A)ANTHRACENE
CHRYSENE
BIS(2-ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE
DI-N-OCTYLPHTHALATE
BENZO(B AND/OR K)FLUORANTHENE
BENZO-A-PYRENE
INDENO (1,2,3-CD) PYRENE
DIBENZO(A,H)ANTHRACENE
BENZO(GHI)PERYLENE
PERCENT MOISTURE
*A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
*K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
*U-M.;TERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
*R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
l!!!!!I 1!!11111 == iilii iiiiil ----- --- ---
EXTRACTABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA. 08/15/95
*** * * * *. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *. * * *** **
**
** **
PROJECT NO. 95-0293 SAMPLE NO. 95449
SOURCE, GA PACIFIC CORP HDWD
STATION ID, 006-SL •
** CASE NO.: 23679
SAMPLE TYPE, SOIL
SAS NO.,
PROG ELEM, NSF COLLECTED
CITY, PLYMOUTH
COLLECTION START, 06/20/95
D. NO., KA90
BY, D RUMFORD
ST, NC
1040 STOP, 00/00/00
**
**
**
**
**
*** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *** UG/KG ANALYTICAL RESULTS
NA PHENOL
NA BIS(2-CHLOROETHYL) ETHER
NA 2-CHLOROPHENOL
NA 1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE
NA 1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE
NA 1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE
NA. 2-METHYLPHENOL
NA 2,2'-CHLOROISOPROPYLETHER
NA (3-AND/OR 4-)METHYLPHENOL
NA N-NITROSODI-N-PROPYLAMINE
NA HEXACHLOROETHANE
NA NITROBENZENE
NA ISOPHORONE
NA 2-NITROPHENOL
NA 2,4-DIMETHYLPHENOL
NA BIS(2-CHLOROETHOXY) METHANE
NA 2,4-DICHLOROPHENOL NA 1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE
NA NAPHTHALENE
NA 4-CHLOROANILINE
NA HEXACHLOROBUTADIENE
NA 4-CHLOR0-3-METHYLPHENOL
NA 2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE
NA HEXACHLOROCYCLOPENTADIENE (HCCP)
NA 2,4,6-TRICHLOROPHENOL
NA 2,4,5-TRICHLOROPHENOL
NA 2-CHLORONAPHTHALENE
NA 2-NITROANILINE NA DIMETHYL PHTHALATE
NA ACENAPHTHYLENE
NA 2,6-DINITROTOLUENE
***REMARKS***
NO SAMPLE CONTAINER RECEIVED
***FOOTNOTES***
UG/KG ANALYTICAL RESULTS
NA 3-NITROANILINE
NA ACENAPHTHENE NA 2,4-DINITROPHENOL
NA 4-NITROPHENOL
NA DIBENZOFURAN
NA 2,4-DINITROTOLUENE
NA DIETHYL PHTHALATE
NA 4-CHLOROPHENYL PHENYL ETHER
NA FLUORENE
NA 4-NITROANILINE
NA 2-METHYL-4,6-DINITROPHENOL
NA N-NITROSODIPHENYLAMINE/DIPHENYLAMINE
NA 4-BROMOPHENYL PHENYL ETHER
NA HEXACHLOROBENZENE (HCB)
NA PENTACHLOROPHENOL
NA PHENANTHRENE
NA ANTHRACENE
NA CARBAZOLE
NA DI-N-BUTYLPHTHALATE
NA FLUORANTHENE
NA PYRENE
NA BENZYL BUTYL PHTHALATE NA 3,3'-DICHLOROBENZIDINE
NA BENZO(A)ANTHRACENE
NA CHRYSENE
NA BIS(2-ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE
NA DI-N-OCTYLPHTHALATE
NA BENZO(B AND/OR K)FLUORANTHENE NA BENZO-A-PYRENE
NA INDENO (1,2,3-CD) PYRENE NA DIBENZO(A,H)ANTHRACENE
NA BENZO(GHI)PERYLENE
PERCENT MOISTURE
***REMARKS***
*A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
*K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
*U-MJ\.TERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
*R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
iilllii ------- ---- ----• I
EXTRACTABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESD, ·ATHENS, GA. . 08/15/95
*** * * *. * *. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *. * * * * * * * * * *** ** **
** **
PROJECT NO. 95-0293 SAMPLE NO. 954.50 SOURCE, GA PACIFIC CORP HDWD
STATION ID, 001-SW,
** CASE NO.: 23679
SAMPLE TYPE, SURFACEWA
SAS NO.,
PROG ELEM, NSF COLLECTED
CITY, PLYMOUTH
COLLECTION START, 06/20/95
D. NO., KA91
BY, D RUMFORD ST, NC
1015 STOP, 00/00/00
**
**
**
**
**
*** * * * *. * * * * *. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *. * * * *** UG/L
lOU
lOU lOU
lOU
lOU
lOU
lOU lOU
lOU
lOU
lOU
lOU
lOU
lOU
lOU
lOU
lOU
lOU
lOU
lOU lOU
lOU
lOU
lOU
lOU
25U
lOU
25U
lOU
lOU
lOU
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
PHENOL
BIS(2-CHLOROETHYL) ETHER
2-CHLOROPHENOL
1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE
1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE
1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE
2-METHYLPHENOL 2,2'-CHLOROISOPROPYLETHER
(3-AND/OR 4-)METHYLPHENOL
N-NITROSODI-N-PROPYLAMINE
HEXACHLOROETHANE
NITROBENZENE
ISOPHORONE
2-NITROPHENOL
2,4-DIMETHYLPHENOL
BIS(2-CHLOROETHOXY) METHANE
2,4-DICHLOROPHENOL
1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE
NAPHTHALENE
4-CHLOROANILINE HEXACHLOROBUTADIENE
4-CHLOR0-3-METHYLPHENOL
2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE
HEXACHLOROCYCLOPENTADIENE (HCCP)
2,4,6-TRICHLOROPHENOL
2,4,5-TRICHLOROPHENOL 2-CHLORONAPHTHALENE
2-NITROANILINE
DIMETHYL PHTHALATE
ACENAPHTHYLENE
2,6-DINITROTOLUENE
***FOOTNOTES***
UG/L
25U lOU
25U
25U
lOU lOU
lOU lOU
lOU
25U
25U
lOU
lOU
lOU
25U lOU
lOU
lOU
lOU
lOU
lOUJ
lOU
lOU
lOU
lOU
lOU
lOU
lOU
lOU
lOU
lOU
lOUJ
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
3-NITROANILINE ACENAPHTHENE
2,4-DINITROPHENOL
4-NITROPHENOL
DIBENZOFURAN
2,4-DINITROTOLUENE
DIETHYL PHTHALATE 4-CHLOROPHENYL PHENYL ETHER
FLUORENE
4-NITROANILINE
2-METHYL-4,6-DINITROPHENOL
N-NITROSODIPHENYLAMINE/DIPHENYLAMINE
4-BROMOPHENYL PHENYL ETHER
HEXACHLOROBENZENE (HCB)
PENTACHLOROPHENOL PHENANTHRENE
ANTHRACENE
CARBAZOLE
DI-N-BUTYLPHTHALATE
FLUORANTHENE
PYRENE
BENZYL BUTYL PHTHALATE
3,3'-DICHLOROBENZIDINE
BENZO(A)ANTHRACENE
CHRYSENE
BIS(2-ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE
DI-N-OCTYLPHTHALATE BENZO(B AND/OR K)FLUORANTHENE
BENZO-A-PYRENE
INDENO (1,2,3-CD) PYRENE
DIBENZO(A,H)ANTHRACENE
BENZO(GHI)PERYLENE
*A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
*K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
*U-M.b.TERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
*R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
------1!!11!!1 !!Ill == liiilil iiii -
EXTRACTABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT
BAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA. 08/15/95
*** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *** •• •• •• ••
PROJECT NO. 95-0293 SAMPLE NO. 95451
SOURCE: GA PACIFIC CORP HDWD
STATION ID: 001-SD,
** CASE NO.: 23679
SAMPLE TYPE: SOIL
SAS NO.:
PROG ELEM: NSF COLLECTED
CITY: PLYMOUTH
COLLECTION START: 06/20/95
D. NO.: KA92
BY:· D RUMFORD
ST: NC
1020 STOP: 00/00/00
•• •• • • •• •• *** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *** UG/KG
B20U
820U
820U
B20U
820U
820U
820U
820U
820U
820U
820U
820U
820U
820U
820U
820U
820U
820U
820U
820U
820U
820U
820U
820U
820U
2100U
820U
2100U
820U
820U
820U
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
PHENOL
BIS(2-CHLOROETHYL) ETHER
2-CHLOROPHENOL
1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE
1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE 1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE
2-METHYLPHENOL
2,2'-CHLOROISOPROPYLETHER
(3-AND/OR 4-)METHYLPHENOL
N-NITROSODI-N-PROPYLAMINE
HEXACHLOROETHANE
NITROBENZENE
ISOPHORONE
2-NITROPHENOL
2,4-DIMETHYLPHENOL
BIS(2-CHLOROETHOXY) METHANE
2,4-DICHLOROPHENOL
1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE
NAPHTHALENE
4-CHLOROANILINE
HEXACHLOROBUTADIENE
4-CHLOR0-3-METHYLPHENOL
2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE
HEXACHLOROCYCLOPENTADIENE (HCCP) 2,4,6-TRICHLOROPHENOL
2,4,5-TRICHLOROPHENOL 2-CHLORONAPHTHALENE
2-NITROANILINE
DIMETHYL PHTHALATE
ACENAPHTHYLENE
2,6-DINITROTOLUENE
***FOOTNOTES***
UG/KG
2100U
820U
2100U
21000
820U
820U
820U
820U
820U
21000
21000
820U
820U
820U
19000
820U
820U
820U
820U
820U
lBOJ 820U
820U
820U
820U 820U
820U 120J
820U
820U
820U
820UJ
60
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
3-NITROANILINE
ACENAPHTHENE
2,4-DINITROPHENOL
4-NITROPHENOL
DIBENZOFURAN 2,4-DINITROTOLUENE
DIETHYL PHTHALATE
4-CHLOROPHENYL PHENYL ETHER
FLUORENE
4-NITROANILINE
2-METHYL-4,6-DINITROPHENOL
N-NITROSODIPHENYLAMINE/DIPHENYLAMINE
4-BROMOPHENYL PHENYL ETHER
HEXACHLOROBENZENE (HCB)
PENTACHLOROPHENOL
PHENANTHRENE
ANTHRACENE
CARBAZOLE
DI-N-BUTYLPHTHALATE
FLUORANTHENE
PYRENE BENZYL BUTYL PHTHALATE
3,3'-DICHLOROBENZIDINE
BENZO(A)ANTHRACENE
CHRYSENE BIS(2-ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE
DI-N-OCTYLPHTHALATE BENZO(B AND/OR K)FLUORANTHENE
BENZO-A-PYRENE
INDENO (1,2,3-CD) PYRENE
DIBENZO(A,H)ANTHRACENE
BENZO(GHI)PERYLENE
PERCENT MOISTURE
*A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
*K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
*U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
*R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
-- -
l!!!!I == ;;;a . liiiil ---- - -
. '
EXTRACTABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA. 08/15/95
*** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *. * * * * •. * * * * * * * * *** •• •• •• ••
PROJECT NO. 95-0293 SAMPLE NO. 95452
SOURCE, GA PACIFIC CORP HDWD
STATION ID, 101-SW
** CASE NO.: 23679
SAMPLE TYPE, SURFACEWA
SAS NO.,
PROG ELEM, NSF COLLECTED
CITY, PLYMOUTH
COLLECTION START, 06/20/95
D. NO., KA93
BY, D RUMFORD
ST, NC
1015 STOP, 00/00/00
•• •• • • •• •• *** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *** UG/L
lOU
lOU
lOU
lOU
lOU
lOU
lOU
lOU
lOU
lOU
lOU
lOU
lOU
lOU
lOU
lOU
lOU
lOU
lOU
lOU
lOU
lOU
lOU lOU
lOU
25U
lOU
25U
lOU
lOU
lOU
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
PHENOL
BIS(2-CHLOROETHYL) ETHER
2-CHLOROPHENOL
1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE
1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE
1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE
2-METHYLPHENOL
2,2'-CHLOROISOPROPYLETHER
(3-AND/OR 4-)METHYLPHENOL
N-NITROSODI-N-PROPYLAMINE
HEXACHLOROETHANE
NITROBENZENE
ISO PHO RONE
2-NITROPHENOL
2,4-DIMETHYLPHENOL
BIS(2-CHLOROETHOXY) METHANE 2,4-DICHLOROPHENOL
1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE
NAPHTHALENE
4-CHLOROANILINE
HEXACHLOROBUTADIENE
4-CHLOR0-3-METHYLPHENOL 2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE
HEXACHLOROCYCLOPENTADIENE (HCCP)
2,4,6-TRICHLOROPHENOL
2, 4, 5-.TRICHLOROPHENOL
2-CHLORONAPHTHALENE
2-NITROANILINE
DIMETHYL PHTHALATE
ACENAPHTHYLENE
2,6-DINITROTOLUENE
***FOOTNOTES***
UG/L
25U
lOU
25U
25U
lOU
lOU
lOU
lOU lOU
25U
25U
lOU
lOU lOU
25U
lOU
lOU
lOU
lOU lOU
lOUJ
lOU
lOU
lOU
lOU lOU
lOU
lOU
lOU
lOU lOU
lOUJ
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
3-NITROANILINE
ACENAPHTHENE
2,4-DINITROPHENOL
4-NITROPHENOL
DIBENZOFURAN
2,4-DINITROTOLUENE
DIETHYL PHTHALATE 4-CHLOROPHENYL PHENYL ETHER ·FLUORENE
4-NITROANILINE
2-METHYL-4,6-DINITROPHENOL
N-NITROSODIPHENYLAMINE/DIPHENYLAMINE 4-BROMOPHENYL PHENYL ETHER
HEXACHLOROBENZENE (HCB)
PENTACHLOROPHENOL
PHENANTHRENE
ANTHRACENE
CARBAZOLE DI-N-BUTYLPHTHALATE
FLUORANTHENE
PYRENE
BENZYL BUTYL PHTHALATE
3,3'-DICHLOROBENZIDINE
BENZO(A)ANTHRACENE
CHRYSENE
BIS(2-ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE
DI-N-OCTYLPHTHALATE
BENZO(B AND/OR K)FLUORANTHENE
BENZO-A-PYRENE
INDENO (1,2,3-CD) PYRENE
DIBENZO(A,H)ANTHRACENE
BENZO(GHI)PERYLENE
*A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED . *NAI-INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
*K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
*U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
*R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS rs NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
ti!!!!! ----a;; "liiiil ----- ---- - --
EXTRACTABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA. 08/15/95
*** * * * •• * •••• * •• *. * * *. * *. *. * *. * •• * * * * *. * * * *. * •• *. * *. * *. * * * * •• * * •• *** **
**
**
**
PROJECT NO. 95-0293 SAMPLE NO. 95453
SOURCE, GA PACIFIC CORP HDWD
STATION ID, 101-SD
•• CASE NO.: 23679
SAMPLE TYPE, SOIL
SAS NO.,
PROG ELEM, NSF COLLECTED CITY, PLYMOUTH
COLLECTION START, 06/20/95
D. NO., KA94
BY, D RUMFORD
ST, NC
1020 STOP, 00/00/00
** •• **
**
** *** * * * *. * * * * * ••• * * •• *. * * * * * *. * * * * * * * * * *. * * * * •• * * * * * * *. * * * •• * * * *. * *** UG/KG
720U
720U
720U
720U
720U
720U
720U
720U
720U
720U
720U
720U
720U
720U
720U
720U
720U
720U
720U
720U
720U
720U
720U
720U
720U
1B00U
720U
1800U . 720U
720U
720U
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
PHENOL
BIS(2-CHLOROETHYL) ETHER
2-CHLOROPHENOL
1,3-DICHLCROBENZENE
1,4-DICHLCROBENZENE
1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE
2-METHYLPHENOL
2,2'-CHLOROISOPROPYLETHER
(3-AND/OR 4-)METHYLPHENOL
N-NITROSODI-N-PROPYLAMINE
HEXACHLOROETHANE
NITROBENZENE
ISOPHORONE 2-NITROPHENOL
2,4-DIMETHYLPHENOL
BIS(2-CHLOROETHOXY) METHANE
2,4-DICHLOROPHENOL
1,2,4-TRICHLCROBENZENE
NAPHTHALENE
4-CHLOROANILINE
HEXACHLOROBUTADIENE
4-CHLORO-3-METHYLPHENOL
2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE
HEXACHLOROCYCLCPENTADIENE (HCCP) 2,4,6-TRICHLOROPHENOL
2,4,5-TRICHLCROPHENOL
2-CHLORONAPHTHALENE
2-NITROANILINE
DIMETHYL PHTHALATE
ACENAPHTHYLENE
2,6-DINITROTOLUENE
***FOOTNOTES***
UG/KG
1800U
720U
1800U
1800U
720U
720U
720U
720U
720U
1800U
1B00U
720U
720U 720U
1800U
720U
720U
720U
720U
110J 140J
720U
720U
720U
720U
720U 720U
110J
720U
720U
720U
720UJ
54
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
3-NITROANILINE
ACENAPHTHENE
2,4-DINITROPHENOL
4-NITROPHENOL
DIBENZOFURAN
2,4-DINITROTOLUENE
DIETHYL PHTHALATE
4-CHLOROPHENYL PHENYL ETHER
FLUORENE
4-NITROANILINE
2-METHYL-4,6-DINITROPHENOL
N-NITROSODIPHENYLAMINE/DIPHENYLAMINE 4-BROMOPHENYL PHENYL ETHER
HEXACHLCROBENZENE (HCB) PENTACHLOROPHENOL
PHENANTHRENE
ANTHRACENE
CARBAZOLE
DI-N-BUTYLPHTHALATE
FLUORANTHENE PYRENE
BENZYL BUTYL PHTHALATE
3,3'-DICHLOROBENZIDINE
BENZO(A)ANTHRACENE
CHRYSENE
BIS(2-ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE DI-N-OCTYLPHTHALATE
BENZO(B AND/OR K)FLUORANTHENE
BENZO-A-PYRENE
INDENO (1,2,3-CD) PYRENE
DIBENZO(A,H)ANTHRACENE BENZO(GHI)PERYLENE
PERCENT MOISTURE
*A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL *K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN *U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
*R-QC.INDICATES THAT DATA·UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
== llliiliiil liiliiii iilil ---- -------__ :
EXTRACTABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA. OB/15/95
*** * * ••• * •• * * *. * •• * * * * * * *. * * * *. * * * * * * * * * * * * * *. * * *. * * *. * * * * * * * •••• *** •• **
** ••
PROJECT NO. 95-0293 SAMPLE NO. 95454
SOURCE, GA PACIFIC CORP HDWD
STATION ID, 004-SL ~
** CASE NO.: 23679
SAMPLE TYPE, SOIL
SAS NO.,
PROG ELEM, NSF COLLECTED
CITY, PLYMOUTH
COLLECTION START, 06/20/95
D. NO., KA95
BY, D RUMFORD
ST, NC
1125 STOP, 00/00/00
••
**
**
**
** ***. * * * * * * •• * * * * * * * *. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *. * * * * *. * * ••• * *. * * * * * * * * *. * * * *** UG/KG
1ioou
12000
12000
12000
1200U
1200U
12000
12000
1200U
12000
12000
1200U
12000
1200U
1200U
12000
12000
12000
12000
12000
12000
12000
12000
12000
12000
31000
12000
31000
12000
12000·
12000
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
PHENOL
BIS(2-CHLOROETHYL) ETHER
2-CHLOROPHENOL
1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE
1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE
1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE
2-METHYLPHENOL
2,2'-CHLOROISOPROPYLETHER
(3-AND/OR 4-)METHYLPHENOL
N-NITROSODI-N-PROPYLAMINE HEXACHLOROETHANE
NITROBENZENE
ISOPHORONE
2-NITROPHENOL
2,4-DIMETHYLPHENOL
BIS(2-CHLOROETHOXY) METHANE
2,4-DICHLOROPHENOL
1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE
NAPHTHALENE
4-CHLOROANILINE
HEXACHLOROBUTADIENE
4-CHLOR0-3-METHYLPHENOL
2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE
HEXACHLOROCYCLOPENTADIENE (HCCP)
2,4,6-TRICHLOROPHENOL
2,4,5-TRICHLOROPHENOL
2-CHLORONAPHTHALENE
2-NITROANILINE
DIMETHYL PHTHALATE
ACENAPHTHYLENE
2,6-DINITROTOLUENE
***FOOTNOTES***
UG/KG
31000
12000
31000 31000
1200U
1200U
12000
1200U
12000
31000
31000
12000
12000
12000
6900
12000
1200U
12000
12000
12000
1200UJ
12000
12000
1200U
12000
12000
12000
12000
12000
12000
1200U
1200UJ
20
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
3-NITROANILINE
ACENAPHTHENE
2,4-DINITROPHENOL
4-NITROPHENOL
DIBENZOFURAN
2,4-DINITROTOLUENE
DIETHYL PHTHALATE
4-CHLOROPHENYL PHENYL ETHER FLUORENE.
4-NITROANILINE
2-METHYL-4,6-DINITROPHENOL
N-NITROSODIPHENYLAMINE/DIPHENYLAMINE 4-BROMOPHENYL PHENYL ETHER
HEXACHLOROBENZENE (HCB)
PENTACHLOROPHENOL
PHENANTHRENE
ANTHRACENE CARBAZOLE
DI-N-BUTYLPHTHALATE
FLUORANTHENE
PYRENE
BENZYL BUTYL PHTHALATE
3,3'-DICHLOROBENZIDINE
BENZO(A)ANTHRACENE CHRYSENE .
BIS(2-ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE
DI-N-OCTYLPHTHALATE
BENZO(B AND/OR K)FLUORANTHENE
BENZO-A-PYRENE
INDENO (1,2,3-CD) PYRENE
DIBENZO(A,H)ANTHRACENE
BENZO(GHI)PERYLENE
PERCENT MOISTURE
*A-AVERAGE VALUE . *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL *K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN *U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
*R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
!!!!I == liiiii liiiil .. --- ------ ---
EXTRACTABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA. 08/15/95
*** •••••• * * •• * * •••••• * * •• * * * * * *. * * •• * * * *. *. *. *. * *. * * * * *. * * *. * •• * * ••• **
**
**
**
PROJECT NO. 95-0293 SAMPLE NO. 95455
SOURCE: GA PACIFIC CORP HDWD
STATION ID: 002-SL
** CASE NO.: 23679
SAMPLE TYPE: SOIL
SAS NO.:
PROG ELEM: NSF COLLECTED
CITY: PLYMOUTH
COLLECTION START: 06/20/95
D. NO.: KAA96
BY: D RUMFORD
ST: NC
1155 STOP: 00/00/00
**
** **
**
** *** * •••• * •• * * •• * * ••• * * * * * * * * *. * *. *. * * * * *. * *. * •• * ••• * *. *. * *. *. * * * * *** UG/KG
570U
570U 570U
570U
570U
570U
570U
570U
570U
570U
570U
570U
570U
570U
570U
570U
570U
570U
570U
570U 570U
570U
570U
570U
570U
1400U
570U
1400U
570U
570U
570U
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
PHENOL
BIS(2-CHLOROETHYL) ETHER
2-CHLOROPHENOL
1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE
1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE
1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE
2-METHYLPHENOL
2,2'-CHLOROISOPROPYLETHER
(3-AND/OR 4-)METHYLPHENOL
N-NITROSODI-N-PROPYLAMINE
HEXACHLOROETHANE
NITROBENZENE
ISO PHO RONE
2-NITROPHENOL
2,4-DIMETHYLPHENOL
BIS(2-CHLOROETHOXY) METHANE
2,4-DICHLOROPHENOL
1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE
NAPHTHALENE
4-CHLOROANILINE
HEXACHLOROBUTADIENE
4-CHLOR0-3-METHYLPHENOL
2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE
HEXACHLOROCYCLOPENTADIENE (HCCP)
2,4,6-TRICHLOROPHENOL
2,4,5-TRICHLOROPHENOL
2-CHLORONAPHTHALENE
2-NITROANILINE
DIMETHYL PHTHALATE
ACENAPHTHYLENE
2,6-DINITROTOLUENE
***FOOTNOTES***
UG/KG
1400U
570U 1400U
1400U
570U
570U
570U
570U
570U
1400U
1400U
570U
570U
570U
1400U
570U
570U
570U
570U
120J
190J 570U
570U
570U
120J
570U
570U 260J
76J
570U
570U
570UJ
42
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
3-NITROANILINE
ACENAPHTHENE
2,4-DINITROPHENOL
4-NITROPHENOL
DIBENZOFURAN
2,4-DINITROTOLUENE
DIETHYL PHTHALATE
4-CHLOROPHENYL PHENYL ETHER
FLUORENE
4-NITROANILINE
2-METHYL-4,6-DINITROPHENOL
N-NITROSODIPHENYLAMINE/DIPHENYLAMINE
4-BROMOPHENYL PHENYL ETHER
HEXACHLOROBENZENE (HCB)
PENTACHLOROPHENOL
PHENANTHRENE ANTHRACENE
CARBAZOLE
DI-N-BUTYLPHTHALATE
FLUORANTHENE
PYRENE
BENZYL BUTYL PHTHALATE
3,3'-DICHLOROBENZIDINE
BENZO(A)ANTHRACENE '
CHRYSENE
BIS(2-ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE
DI-N-OCTYLPHTHALATE
BENZO(B AND/OR K)FLUORANTHENE
BENZO-A-PYRENE
INDENO (1,2,3-CD) PYRENE
DIBENZO(A,H)ANTHRACENE
BENZO(GHI)PERYLENE
PERCENT MOISTURE
*A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED. *NAI-INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
*K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
*U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
*R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
!!!!!I Iii& iili iiiil -- --- -- -- - ----
EXTRACTABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, 'GA. 08/15/95
*** * *. * * * * * * * •• * *. * *. * * * * * * * *. * * * * *. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *. * *** •• •• •• ••
PROJECT NO. 95-0293 SAMPLE NO. 95456
SOURCE: GA PACIFIC CORP HDWD
STATION ID: 009-SW'
** CASE NO.: 23679
SAMPLE TYPE: SURFACEWA
SAS NO.:
PROG ELEM: NSF COLLECTED
CITY: PLYMOUTH
COLLECTION START: 06/19/95
D.NO.:KA79
BY: D RUMFORD
ST: NC
1350 STOP: 00/00/00
•• •• • • •• •• ***. * * * * * •• * *. * * *. *. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *·* * * * *** UG/L
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U 10U
10U.
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U 10U
10U
10U
10U
25U 10U
25U
10U
10U
10U
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
PHENOL
BIS(2-CHLOROETHYL) ETHER
2-CHLOROPHENOL
1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE
1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE
1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE
2-METHYLPHENOL
2,2'-CHLOROISOPROPYLETHER
(3-AND/OR 4-)METHYLPHENOL
N-NITROSODI-N-PROPYLAMINE
HEXACHLOROETHANE
NITROBENZENE
ISO PHO RONE
2-NITROPHENOL
2,4-DIMETHYLPHENOL
BIS(2-CHLOROETHOXY) METHANE 2,4-DICHLOROPHENOL
1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE
NAPHTHALENE
4-CHLOROANILINE
HEXACHLOROBUTADIENE 4-CHLOR0-3-METHYLPHENOL
2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE
HEXACHLOROCYCLOPENTADIENE (HCCP)
2,4,6-TRICHLOROPHENOL
2,4,5-TRICHLOROPHENOL
2-CHLORONAPHTHALENE
2-NITROANILINE
DIMETHYL PHTHALATE
ACENAPHTHYLENE
2,6-DINITROTOLUENE
***FOOTNOTES***
UG/L
25U
lOU
25U
25U
lOU
lOU
lOU
lOU
lOU
25U
25U
lOU
lOU
lOU
2SU
lOU
lOU
lOU
lOU
lOU
lOUJ
lOU
lOU
lOU
lOU
lOU
lOU
lOU
lOU
lOU
lOU
lOUJ
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
3-NITROANILINE
ACENAPHTHENE
2,4-DINITROPHENOL
4-NITROPHENOL
DIBENZOFURAN
2,4-DINITROTOLUENE
DIETHYL PHTHALATE
4-CHLOROPHENYL PHENYL ETHER
FLUORENE
4-NITROANILINE
2-METHYL-4,6-DINITROPHENOL
N-NITROSODIPHENYLAMINE/DIPHENYLAMINE
4-BROMOPHENYL PHENYL ETHER
HEXACHLOROBENZENE (HCB)
PENTACHLOROPHENOL
PHENANTHRENE
ANTHRACENE CARBAZOLE
DI-N-BUTYLPHTHALATE
FLUORANTHENE
PYRENE
BENZYL BUTYL PHTHALATE
3,3'-DICHLOROBENZIDINE
BENZO(A)ANTHRACENE
CHRYSENE
BIS(2-ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE
DI-N-OCTYLPHTHALATE
BENZO(B AND/OR K)FLUORANTHENE
BENZO-A-PYRENE
INDENO (1,2,3-CD) PYRENE
DIBENZO(A,H)ANTHRACENE
BENZO(GHI)PERYLENE
*A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
*K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
*U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
*R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
liiiil liiEI --- --- -- ------' ';
EXTRACTABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA. 08/15/95
***. * * * * * *. * * * * * *. * * * * * * * * * * •• *. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * •• * *. * * *. * •• *** **
**
**
**
PROJECT NO. 95-0293 SAMPLE NO. 95457
SOURCE, GA PACIFIC CORP HOWD
STATION ID, 009-SD,
** CASE NO.: 23679
SAMPLE TYPE, SOIL
SAS NO.,
PROG ELEM, NSF COLLECTED
CITY, PLYMOUTH
COLLECTION START, 06/19/95
D. NO., KABO
BY, D RUMFORD
ST, NC
1425 STOP, 00/00/00
**
**
**
**
** *** * * * *. * * * * * •• * *. * * * * * *. * *. * *. * •• * * •• * *. * * * * * * * *. *. *. * * * * * * *. * *. *** UG/KG
810U
810U
810U
810U
810U
810U
810U
810U
1200
810U
810U
810U 810U
810U
810U
810U
810U
810U
810U
810U
810U
810U
810U
810U 810U
2000U
810U
2000U
810U
810U
810U
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
PHENOL
BIS(2-CHLOROETHYL) ETHER
2-CHLOROPHENOL
1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE
1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE
1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE
2-METHYLPHENOL 2,2'-CHLOROISOPROPYLETHER
(3-AND/OR 4-)METHYLPHENOL
N-NITROSODI-N-PROPYLAMINE
HEXACHLOROETHANE
NITROBENZENE
ISOPHORONE
2-NITROPHENOL
2,4-DIMETHYLPHENOL
BIS(2-CHLOROETHOXY) METHANE
2,4-DICHLOROPHENOL
1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE
NAPHTHALENE
4-CHLOROANILINE
HEXACHLOROBUTADIENE
4-CHLOR0-3-METHYLPHENOL
2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE
HEXACHLOROCYCLOPENTADIENE (HCCP)
2,4,6-TRICHLOROPHENOL
2,4,5-TRICHLOROPHENOL
2-CHLORONAPHTHALENE
2-NITROANILINE
DIMETHYL PHTHALATE
ACENAPHTHYLENE
2,6-DINITROTOLUENE
***FOOTNOTES***
UG/KG
2000U
BlOU
2000U
2000U
BlOU
BlOU
BlOU
BlOU
810U
2000U
2000U
810U
810U
810U
9500 200J
810U
810U
810U
420J 810J
810U
810U
810U
490J
810U
810U
870
460J
230J
810U
260J
60
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
3-NITROANILINE
ACENAPHTHENE
2,4-DINITROPHENOL
4-NITROPHENOL
DIBENZOFURAN
2,4-DINITROTOLUENE
DIETHYL PHTHALATE
4-CHLOROPHENYL PHENYL ETHER
FLUORENE
4-NITROANILINE
2-METHYL-4,6-DINITROPHENOL
N-NITROSODIPHENYLAMINE/DIPHENYLAMINE
4-BROMOPHENYL PHENYL ETHER
HEXACHLOROBENZENE (HCB)
PENTACHLOROPHENOL PHENANTHRENE
ANTHRACENE
CARBAZOLE
DI-N-BUTYLPHTHALATE
FLUORANTHENE
PYRENE BENZYL BUTYL PHTHALATE
3,3'-DICHLOROBENZIDINE BENZO(A)ANTHRACENE
CHRYSENE
BIS(2-ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE
DI-N-OCTYLPHTHALATE
BENZO(B AND/OR K)FLUORANTHENE
BENZO-A-PYRENE
INDENO (1,2,3-CD) PYRENE
DIBENZO(A,H)ANTHRACENE
BENZO(GHI)PERYLENE
PERCENT MOISTURE
*A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAT-INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE .OF MATERIAL
*K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
*U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER rs THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
*R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS rs NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION. .. ------111!!!!!!1 l!!!!!I --iliil -
EXTRACTABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA. 08/15/95
*** * *. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *** ** **
**
**
PROJECT NO. 95-0293 SAMPLE NO. 95458 SOURCE, GA PACIFIC CORP HDWD
STATION ID, 010-SW /
** CASE NO.: 23679
SAMPLE TYPE, SURFACEWA
SAS NO.,
PROG ELEM, NSF COLLECTED
CITY, PLYMOUTH
COLLECTION START, 06/19/95
D. NO., KA81
BY, D RUMFORD
ST, NC
1615 STOP, 00/00/00
**
**
**
**
**
*** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *** UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS
lOU PHENOL
lOU BIS(2-CHLOROETHYL) ETHER
lOU 2-CHLOROPHENOL
lOU 1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE
lOU 1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE
lOU 1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE
lOU 2-METHYLPHENOL lOU 2,2'-CHLOROISOPROPYLETHER
lOU (3-AND/OR 4-)METHYLPHENOL
lOU N-NITROSODI-N-PROPYLAMINE
lOU HEXACHLOROETHANE
lOU NITROBENZENE
lOU ISOPHORONE
lOU 2-NITROPHENOL
lOU 2,4-DIMETHYLPHENOL
lOU BIS(2-CHLOROETHOXY) METHANE
lOU 2,4-DICHLOROPHENOL
lOU 1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE
lOU NAPHTHALENE
lOU 4-CHLOROANILINE lOU HEXACHLOROBUTADIENE
lOU 4-CHLOR0-3-METHYLPHENOL
lOU 2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE
lOU HEXACHLOROCYCLOPENTADIENE (HCCP)
lOU 2,4,6-TRICHLOROPHENOL
25U 2,4,5-TRICHLOROPHENOL
lOU 2-CHLORONAPHTHALENE
25U 2-NITROANILINE
lOU DIMETHYL PHTHALATE
lOU ACENAPHTHYLENE
lOU 2,6-DINITROTOLUENE
***FOOTNOTES***
UG/L
25U
lOU
25U 25U
lOU
lOU
lOU
lOU
lOU
25U
25U
lOU
lOU
lOU
25U
lOU
lOU
lOU
lOU
lOU
lOUJ
lOU
lOU
lOU
lOU
lOU
lOU
lOU
lOU
lOU lOU
lOUJ
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
3-NITROANILINE
ACENAPHTHENE 2,4-DINITROPHENOL
4-NITROPHENOL
DIBENZOFURAN
2,4-DINITROTOLUENE
DIETHYL PHTHALATE
4-CHLOROPHENYL PHENYL ETHER
FLUORENE
4-NITROANILINE
2-METHYL-4,6-DINITROPHENOL
N-NITROSODIPHENYLAMINE/DIPHENYLAMINE 4-BROMOPHENYL PHENYL ETHER
HEXACHLOROBENZENE (HCB)
PENTACHLOROPHENOL
PHENANTHRENE
ANTHRACENE CARBAZOLE
DI-N-BUTYLPHTHALATE FLUORANTHENE
PYRENE
BENZYL BUTYL PHTHALATE
3,3'-DICHLOROBENZIDINE
BENZO(A)ANTHRACENE
CHRYSENE BIS(2-ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE
DI-N-OCTYLPHTHALATE
BENZO(B AND/OR K)FLUORANTHENE
BENZO-A-PYRENE
INDENO (1,2,3-CD) PYRENE
DIBENZO(A,H)ANTHRACENE
BENZO(GHI)PERYLENE
*A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
*K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
*U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT. *R-QC.INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
-... -I!!!!!!!!! - ----- --
EXTRACTABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT ••••• •-· * •• *. * * * * * ••• * * * •• •• •• ••
PROJECT NO. 95-0293 SAMPLE NO. 95459
SOURCE: GA PACIFIC CORP HDWD STATION ID: 010-SD
** CASE NO.: 23679
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS-MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA. 08/15/95
•• * * * * * ••• * *. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *. * *. * * * * * * * * *** SAMPLE TYPE: SOIL
SAS NO.:
PROG ELEM: NSF COLLECTED
CITY: PLYMOUTH
COLLECTION START: 06/19/95
D. NO.: KA82
BY: D RUMFORD
ST: NC
1620 STOP: 00/00/00
•• •• • • •• •• *** * *. * * * *. *. * * *. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * •• * * *. * * *. * *. * * * * * * * * * *. * * *. * * * ••• UG/KG
620U
620U
620U
620U
620U
620U
620U
620U
620U
620U
620U
620U
620U
620U
620U
620U
620U
620U
620U
620U
620U
620U
620U
620U 620U
1600U
620U
1600U 620U
620U
620U
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
PHENOL
BIS(2-CHLOROETHYL) ETHER
2-CHLOROPHENOL
1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE
1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE
1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE
2-METHYLPHENOL
2,2'-CHLOROISOPROPYLETHER
(3-AND/OR 4-)METHYLPHENOL
N-NITROSODI-N-PROPYLAMINE
HEXACHLOROETHANE
NITROBENZENE
ISOPHORONE
2-NITROPHENOL
2,4-DIMETHYLPHENOL
BIS(2-CHLOROETHOXY) METHANE
2,4-DICHLOROPHENOL
1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE NAPHTHALENE
4-CHLOROANILINE
HEXACHLOROBUTADIENE
4-CHLOR0-3-METHYLPHENOL
2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE
HEXACHLOROCYCLOPENTADIENE (HCCP)
2,4,6-TRICHLOROPHENOL
2,4,5-TRICHLOROPHENOL
2-CHLORONAPHTHALENE
2-NITROANILINE DIMETHYL PHTHALATE
ACENAPHTHYLENE
2,6-DINITROTOLUENE
***FOOTNOTES***
UG/KG
1600U
620U
1600U
1600U
620U
620U
620U
620U
620U 1600U
1600U
620U
620U 620U
1600U
620U
620U
620U
620U 120J
150J
620U
620U
620U
620U
620U
620U
120J
620U
620U 620U
620UJ
47
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
3-NITROANILINE ACENAPHTHENE
2,4-DINITROPHENOL
4-NITROPHENOL
DIBENZOFURAN
2,4-DINITROTOLUENE DIETHYL PHTHALATE
4-CHLOROPHENYL PHENYL ETHER FLUORENE
4-NITROANILINE
2-METHYL-4,6-DINITROPHENOL
N-NITROSODIPHENYLAMINE/DIPHENYLAMINE
4-BROMOPHENYL PHENYL ETHER
HEXACHLOROBENZENE (HCB)
PENTACHLOROPHENOL
PHENANTHRENE
ANTHRACENE
CARBAZOLE
DI-N-BUTYLPHTHALATE
FLUORANTHENE
PYRENE
BENZYL BUTYL PHTHALATE
3,3'-DICHLOROBENZIDINE
BENZO(A)ANTHRACENE
CHRYSENE
BIS(2-ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE
DI-N-OCTYLPHTHALATE .
BENZO(B AND/OR K)FLUORANTHENE
BENZO-A-PYRENE
INDENO (1,2,3-CD) PYRENE
DIBENZO(A,H)ANTHRACENE
BENZO(GHI)PERYLENE
PERCENT MOISTURE
*A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE .EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL *K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN *U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
*R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
- ----l!!!!!!I liiiiilil iilil -- ----
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA. REPRINTED ON 08/21/95 EXTRACTABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT
*** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *** •• •• •• ••
PROJECT NO. 95-0293 SAMPLE NO. 95460 SOURCE, GA PACIFIC CORP HDWD STATION ID, 109-SW
** CASE NO.: 23679
SAMPLE TYPE, SURFACWA
SAS NO.,
PROG ELEM, NSF COLLECTED
CITY, PLYMOUTH
COLLECTION START, 06/19/95
D. NO., KA83
BY, D RUMFORD
ST, NC
1350 STOP, 00/00/00
•• •• • • •• •• *** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *** UG/L
lOU
10U
lOU
10U
lOU
10U lOU
lOU lOU
lOU
lOU
10U
lOU lOU
lOU
lOU
lOU
lOU
10U
10U
lOU
lOU
lOU
lOU
lOU
25U
lOU
25U
lOU
lOU
lOU
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
PHENOL
BIS(2-CHLOROETHYL) ETHER 2-CHLOROPHENOL
1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE
1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE
1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE
2-METHYLPHENOL
2,2'-CHLOROISOPROPYLETHER
(3-AND/OR 4-)METHYLPHENOL
N-NITROSODI-N-PROPYLAMINE
HEXACHLOROETHANE
NITROBENZENE ISOPHORONE
2-NITROPHENOL
2,4-DIMETHYLPHENOL
BIS(2-CHLOROETHOXY) METHANE 2,4-DICHLOROPHENOL
1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE NAPHTHALENE
4-CHLOROANILINE
HEXACHLOROBUTADIENE
4-CHLOR0-3-METHYLPHENOL
2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE
HEXACHLOROCYCLOPENTADIENE (HCCP) 2,4,6-TRICHLOROPHENOL
2,4,5-TRICHLOROPHENOL
2-CHLORONAPHTHALENE
2-NITROANILINE
DIMETHYL PHTHALATE ACENAPHTHYLENE
2,6-DINITROTOLUENE
***REMARKS***
***FOOTNOTES***
UG/L
25U
lOU
25U
25U
lOU
10U
lOU
lOU
lOU
25U
25U
lOU
lOU
lOU
25U 10U
10U
10U
lOU
10U
lOUJ
10U ·1ou
lOU
10U
10U
lOU
lOU
lOU
10U
lOU
lOUJ
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
3-NITROANILINE
ACENAPHTHENE
2,4-DINITROPHENOL
4-NITROPHENOL
DIBENZOFURAN
2,4-DINITROTOLUENE
DIETHYL PHTHALATE 4-CHLOROPHENYL PHENYL ETHER FLUORENE
4-NITROANILINE
2-METHYL-4,6-DINITROPHENOL
N-NITROSODIPHENYLAMINE/DIPHENYLAMINE
4-BROMOPHENYL PHENYL ETHER HEXACHLOROBENZENE (HCB) PENTACHLOROPHENOL
PHENANTHRENE
ANTHRACENE
CARBAZOLE
DI-N-BUTYLPHTHALATE FLUORANTHENE
PYRENE
BENZYL BUTYL PHTHALATE
3,3'-DICHLOROBENZIDINE
BENZO(A)ANTHRACENE
CHRYSENE
BIS(2-ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE DI-N-OCTYLPHTHALATE
BENZO(B AND/OR K)FLUORANTHENE BENZO-A-PYRENE
INDENO (1,2,3-CD) PYRENE DIBENZO(A,H)ANTHRACENE
BENZO(GHI)PERYLENE
***REMARKS***
*A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL *K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN *U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER rs THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT. *R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS rs NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
----liiliil liiil -------

-
EXTRACTABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT
· SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA. 08/15/95
*** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ·• * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *** •• •• •• ••
PROJECT NO. 95-0293 SAMPLE NO. 95461
SOURCE, GA PACIFIC CORP HDWD
STATION ID, 109-SD
** CASE NO.: 23679
SAMPLE TYPE, SOIL
SAS NO.,
PROG ELEM, NSF COLLECTED
CITY, PLYMOUTH
COLLECTION START, 06/19/95
D. NO., KA84
BY, D RUMFORD
ST, NC
1425 STOP, 00/00/00
•• •• • • •• ••
*** * * * * * * * * * * * *. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *** UG/KG
2400U
2400U
2400U
2400U
2400U
2400U
2400U 2400U
2400U
2400U
2400U
2400U
2400U
2400U
2400U
2400U
2400U
2400U
2400U
2400U
2400U
2400U
2400U
2400U
2400U
6000U
2400U
6000U
2400U
2400U
2400U
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
PHENOL
BIS(2-CHLOROETHYL) ETHER
2-CHLOROPHENOL
1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE
1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE
1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE
2-METHYLPHENOL 2,2'-CHLOROISOPROPYLETHER
(3-AND/OR 4-)METHYLPHENOL
N-NITROSODI-N-PROPYLAMINE
HEXACHLOROETHANE
NITROBENZENE
ISOPHORONE
2-NITROPHENOL
2,4-DIMETHYLPHENOL
BIS(2-CHLOROETHOXY) METHANE
2,4-DICHLOROPHENOL
1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE NAPHTHALENE
4-CHLOROANILINE
HEXACHLOROBUTADIENE
4-CHLOR0-3-METHYLPHENOL
2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE
HEXACHLOROCYCLOPENTADIENE (HCCP)
2,4,6-TRICHLOROPHENOL
2,4,5-TRICHLOROPHENOL
2-CHLORONAPHTHALENE
2-NITROANILINE
DIMETHYL PHTHALATE
ACENAPHTHYLENE
2,6-DINITROTOLUENE
***FOOTNOTES***
UG/KG
6000U 2400U
6000U
6000U
2400U
2400U
2400U
2400U
2400U
6000U
6000U
2400U
2400U
2400U
9200
2400U
2400U
2400U
2400U
410J
640J
2400U
2400U
2400U
410J
2400U
2400U
680J
340J
2400U
2400U
2400UJ
59
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
3-NITROANILINE ACENAPHTHENE
2,4-DINITROPHENOL
4-NITROPHENOL
DIBENZOFURAN
2,4-DINITROTOLUENE
DIETHYL PHTHALATE
4-CHLOROPHENYL PHENYL ETHER
FLUORENE
4-NITROANILINE
2-METHYL-4,6-DINITROPHENOL
N-NITROSODIPHENYLAMINE/DIPHENYLAMINE
4-BROMOPHENYL PHENYL ETHER
HEXACHLOROBENZENE (HCB)
PENTACHLOROPHENOL
PHENANTHRENE
ANTHRACENE
CARBAZOLE
DI-N-BUTYLPHTHALATE
FLUORANTHENE
PYRENE
BENZYL BUTYL PHTHALATE
'1, 3' -DICHLOROBENZIDINE
BENZO(A)ANTHRACENE
CHRYSENE
BIS(2-ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE
DI-N-OCTYLPHTHALATE
BENZO(B AND/OR K)FLUORANTHENE
BENZO-A-PYRENE
INDENO (1,2,3-CD) PYRENE
DIBENZO(A,H)ANTHRACENE
BENZO(GHI)PERYLENE
PERCENT MOISTURE
*A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
*K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
*U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
*R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION. -·-- - -
1!!11!1 == == liiliiil liiiil - -- -- -
EXTRACTABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA. 08/15/95
*** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *** •• •• •• ••
PROJECT NO. 95-0293 SAMPLE NO. 95462
SOURCE, GA PACIFIC CORP HDWD
STATION ID, 013-RN
** CASE NO.: 23679
SAMPLE TYPE, SURFACWA
SAS NO.,
FROG ELEM, NSF COLLECTED
CITY, PLYMOUTH
COLLECTION START, 06/19/95
D. NO., KA97
BY, D RUMFORD
ST, NC
0700 STOP, 00/00/00
•• •• • • •• •• *** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *** UG/L
lOU
lOU
lOU
lOU
lOU
lOU
lOU
lOU
lOU
lOU
lOU
lOU
lOU
lOU
lOU
lOU
lOU
lOU
lOU
lOU
lOU
lOU
lOU
lOU
lOU
25U
lOU
25U
lOU
lOU
lOU
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
PHENOL
BIS(2-CHLOROETHYL) ETHER 2-CHLOROPHENOL
1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE
1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE
1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE
2-METHYLPHENOL
2,2'-CHLOROISOPROPYLETHER
(3-AND/OR 4-)METHYLPHENOL
N-NITROSODI-N-PROPYLAMINE
HEXACHLOROETHANE
NITROBENZENE
ISOPHORONE
2-NITROPHENOL
2,4-DIMETHYLPHENOL
BIS(2-CHLOROETHOXY) METHANE
2,4-DICHLOROPHENOL
1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE
NAPHTHALENE
4 -CHLOROANILINE
HEXACHLOROBUTADIENE
4-CHLOR0-3-METHYLPHENOL
2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE
HEXACHLOROCYCLOPENTADIENE (HCCP) 2,4,6-TRICHLOROPHENOL 2,4,5-TRICHLOROPHENOL
2-CHLORONAPHTHALENE
2-NITROANILINE
DIMETHYL PHTHALATE
ACENAPHTHYLENE
2,6-DINITROTOLUENE
***FOOTNOTES***
UG/L
25U
lOU
25U 25U
lOU
lOU
lOU
lOU
lOU
25U
25U
lOU
lOU
lOU
25U
lOU
lOU
lOU
lOU
lOU
lOUJ lOU
lOU
lOU
lOU
lOU
lOU
lOU
lOU
lOU
lOU
lOUJ
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
3-NITROANILINE
ACENAPHTHENE
2,4-DINITROPHENOL
4-NITROPHENOL
DIBENZOFURAN
2,4-DINITROTOLUENE
DIETHYL PHTHALATE
4-CHLOROPHENYL PHENYL ETHER
FLUORENE
4-NITROANILINE
2-METHYL-4,6-DINITROPHENOL
NcNITROSODIPHENYLAMINE/DIPHENYLAMINE
4-BROMOPHENYL PHENYL ETHER
HEXACHLOROBENZENE (HCB)
PENTACHLOROPHENOL PHENANTHRENE
ANTHRACENE
CARBAZOLE
DI-N-BUTYLPHTHALATE
FLUORANTHENE
PYRENE
BENZYL BUTYL PHTHALATE
3,3'-DICHLOROBENZIDINE
BENZO(A)ANTHRACENE
CHRYSENE
BIS(2-ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE DI-N-OCTYLPHTHALATE
BENZO(B AND/OR K)FLUORANTHENE
BENZO-A-PYRENE
INDENO (1,2,3-CD) PYRENE
DIBENZO(A,H)ANTHRACENE
BENZO(GHI)PERYLENE
. *A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
*K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
*U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
*R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT.' RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
-----1!!!111 l!!!!l!I == lilliii ----- - -
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA.
MISCELLANEOUS EXTRACTABLE COMPOUNDS -DATA REPORT
08/15/95
*** *. *. * * * ••• *. * * *. * * *. * * * *. * * *. * * * *. * *. * * *. * * * * * * *. *. * * *. * *. * * * * *** •• •• •• •• ••
PROJECT NO. 95-0293 SAMPLE-NO. 95445 SOURCE, GA PACIFIC CORP HDWD SAMPLE TYPE, SOIL
STATION ID, 007-SL
CASE.NO., 23679 SAS NO.,
PROG ELEM, NSF COLLECTED
CITY, PLYMOUTH
COLLECTION START, 06/20/95
D. NO., KA86
BY, D RUMFORD ST, NC
0900 STOP, 00/00/00
MD NO, KA86
•• •• •• •• •• *** * * * * * * * * *. * * •• * * * * * * * * *. * * * * •• * * *. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *. * * * * *. * •• * * ***
***REMARKS***
EXCESSIVE HOLDING TIME
*.**FOOTNOTES***
50000JN
BOOOOJN
40000JN
60000JN
lOOOOJN
20000JN lOOOOOJN
300000JN 200000JN"
lOOOOOJN
400000J
ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/KG
TETRACHLOROPHENOL
DIMETHYLPHENANTHRENE (3 ISOMERS)
TRIMETHYLPHENANTHRENE (2 ISOMERS)
METHYLPYRENE (2 ISOMERS) BENZANTHRACENONE
TETRACHLORODIBENZODIOXIN
PENTACHLORODIBENZODIOXIN (2 ISOMERS)
TETRACHLOROBENZENE (2 ISOMERS)
HEXACHLORODIBENZODIOXIN
OCTACHLORODIBENZODIOXIN
6 UNIDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS
***REMARKS***
*A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL *K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN *U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT.NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
*R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
----I!!!!! liiiiii liiii -- -- - - --
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA.
MISCELLANEOUS EXTRACTABLE COMPOUNDS -DATA REPORT
08/15/95
*** * * ••• * * * *. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *. * + * * * *** **
**
**
.**
**
PROJECT NO. 95-0293 SAMPLE NO. 95446
SOURCE: GA PACIFIC CORP HDWD
STATION ID: 107-SL
CASE.NO.: 23679 SAS NO.:
SAMPLE TYPE: SOIL PROG ELEM: NSF COLLECTED
CITY: PLYMOUTH
COLLECTION START: 06/20/95 D. NO.: KA87
BY: D RUMFORD
ST: NC
0900 STOP: 00/00/00
MD NO: KA87
**
**
**
**
**
*** * * * * * •• *. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *. * * ***
***REMARKS***
EXCESSIVE HOLDING TIME
3+E06JN
500000J
ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/KG
TETRACHLOROPHENOL
11 UNIDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS
***REMARKS***
***FOOTNOTES*** *A-AVERAGE VALUE ·•NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
*K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
*U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
*R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
-·-.. -l!!!l!!!!!!I 1!!11!!1 I!!!!!! iliiii iiliiil illlii - - -
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA.
MISCELLANEOUS EXTRACTABLE COMPOUNDS -DATA REPORT
08/15/95
*** * * * * *·* * *. * * * * * *. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *** •• •• •• •• ••
PROJECT NO. 95-0293 SAMPLE NO. 95447
SOURCE, GA PACIFIC CORP HDWD
STATION ID, 003-SL
CASE.NO., 23679 SAS NO.,
SAMPLE TYPE, SOIL PROG ELEM, NSF COLLECTED
CITY, PLYMOUTH
COLLECTION START, 06/20/95
D. NO., KABB
BY, D RUMFORD ST, NC
0950 STOP, 00/00/00
MD NO, KABB
•• •• •• •• •• *** * * * * * *. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ***
***FOOTNOTES***
300JN
3000J
ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/KG
TETRACHLOROPHENOL
4 UNIDENTIFIED.COMPOUNDS
*A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
*K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN *U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
*R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION .
---- -
.. -- - ----..
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA.
MISCELLANEOUS EXTRACTABLE COMPOUNDS -DATA REPORT
08/15/95
***. * * * * ••• *. * * * •• * * * •• * * * * * * * * * * *. * * * * * * * * * * * •• * * * * •• * * * * * * * *. * * *** **
** **
**
**
PROJECT NO. 95-0293 SAMPLE NO. 95448
SOURCE, GA PACIFIC CORP HDWD
STATION ID, 005-SL
CASE.NO., 23679 SAS NO.,
SAMPLE TYPE, SOIL PROG ELEM, NSF COLLECTED
CITY, PLYMOUTH
COLLECTION START, 06/20/95
D. NO., KA89
BY, D RUMFORD ST, NC
1020 STOP, 00/00/00
MD NO, KA89
**
** •• **
** *** *. * * * * •• * * * •• * *. * * * *. *. *. * •• * * *. * •. * •• * * *. * * * * * * * *. *. * * * * * * •• * * ***
***FOOTNOTES***
900JN 70000J
ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/KG
HEXACHLOROBIPHENYL
28 UNIDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS
*A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
*K-ACTUAL VALUE. IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN .
*U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
*R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
liiil - --- ---
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, ,GA.
MISCELLANEOUS EXTRACTABLE COMPOUNDS -DATA REPORT
08/15/95
*** * * * *. * * * * * * * * * * * *. * * * * * * * * * *. * * * * * ·* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *** •• •• •• •• ••
PROJECT NO. 95-0293 SAMPLE NO. 95451
SOURCE, GA PACIFIC CORP HDWD
STATION ID, 001-SD
CASE.NO., 23679 SAS NO.,
SAMPLE TYPE, SOIL PROG ELEM, NSF COLLECTED
CITY, PLYMOUTH
COLLECTION START, 06/20/95
D. NO., KA92
BY, D RUMFORD
ST, NC
1020 STOP, 00/00/00
MD NO, KA92
•• •• • • •• •• *** * * *. * * * * * * * * * * * * * •• *. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *. * * * * *. * * * * * * * * * * * * *. * * * * * ***
***FOOTNOTES***
BOOJN
3000J
ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/KG
TETRACHLOROPHENOL
2 UNIDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS
*A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
*K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
*U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
*R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
~11111!11.:,__ ______ .. 1!!!!!!1--m=-==-· --. -- - -- -- ----
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS·MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA.
MISCELLANEOUS EXTRACTABLE COMPOUNDS -DATA REPORT
08/15/95
*** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *** **
**
**
**
**
PROJECT NO. 95-0293 SAMPLE·NO. 95453
SOURCE: GA PACIFIC CORP HDWD
STATION ID: 101-SD
CASE.NO.: 23679 SAS NO.:
SAMPLE TYPE: SOIL PROG ELEM: NSF COLLECTED
CITY: PLYMOUTH
COLLECTION START: 06/20/95
D. NO.: KA94
BY: D RUMFORD
ST: NC
1020 -STOP: 00/00/0~
MD NO: KA94
**
**
**
**
** *** * * * * * * * * *. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ***
7000J
***FOOTNOTES***
ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/KG
4 UNIDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS
*A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES ~J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
*K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
*U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
*R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
----· -~--------==--iiii ----- -- --
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA.
MISCELLANEOUS EXTRACTABLE COMPOUNDS -DATA REPORT
08/15/95
*** •• *. * •••••• * * * * *. * *. * * * •• * * *. * * * * * * *. *-* *. * * * *. * •• *. * *. *. * * *. * * *** •• •• •• •• ••
PROJECT NO. 95-0293 SAMPLE NO. 95454
SOURCE, GA PACIFIC CORP HDWD SAMPLE TYPE, SOIL
STATION ID, 004-SL
CASE.NO., 23679 SAS NO.,
PROG ELEM, NSF COLLECTED CITY, PLYMOUTH
COLLECTION START, 06/20/95
D. NO., KA95
BY, D RUMFORD ST, NC
1125 STOP, 00/00/00 MD NO, KA95
•• •• •• •• •• *** *· * ••• * ••• * * * * •• *. * * *. * *. * ••• *. * * * * * * * * * *. * * * * * * * * * * *. * * *. * * * * * ***
***FOOTNOTES***
lOOOJN
9000J
ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/KG
TETRACHLOROPHENOL
4 UNIDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS
*A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
*K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
*U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER rs THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
*R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS rs NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
-- - -- -- -- -
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA.
MISCELLANEOUS EXTRACTABLE COMPOUNDS -DATA REPORT
08/15/95
*** * * *. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *** •• •• •• •• ••
PROJECT NO. 95-0293 SAMPLE NO. 95455
SOURCE, GA PACIFIC CORP HDWD
STATION ID, 002-SL
CASE.NO., 23679 SAS NO·.,
SAMPLE TYPE, SOIL PROG ELEM, NSF COLLECTED
CITY, PLYMOUTH
COLLECTION START, 06/20/95
D. NO., KAA96
BY, D RUMFORD
ST, NC
1155 STOP, 00/00/00
MD NO, KA96
•• •• •• •• •• *** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ***
9000J
***FOOTNOTES***
ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/KG
10 UNIDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS
*A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
*K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
*U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
*R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
lililil liiilil -- -
_,
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA.
MISCELLANEOUS EXTRACTABLE COMPOUNDS -DATA REPORT
08/15/95
*** * * •• * * *. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *** •• •• •• •• ••
PROJECT NO. 95-0293 SAMPLE NO. 95457
SOURCE, GA PACIFIC CORP HDWD· SAMPLE TYPE, SOIL
STATION ID, 009-SD
CASE.NO., 23679 SAS NO.,
PROG ELEM, NSF COLLECTED CITY, PLYMOUTH
COLLECTION START, 06/19/95
D. NO., KAB0
BY, D RUMFORD ST, NC
1425 STOP, 00/00/00
MD NO, KAB0
•• •• •• •• •• *** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ***
***FOOTNOTES***
1000JN
20000J
ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/KG
BENZENEACETIC ACID
15 UNIDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS
*A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
*K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN *U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
*R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
_--------------------1!!!!9-: ==------iiiii ----
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA.
MISCELLANEOUS EXTRACTABLE COMPOUNDS -DATA REPORT
08/15/95
*** * * *. * * *. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *** •• •• •• •• ••
PROJECT NO. 95-0293 SAMPLE NO. 95459
SOURCE: GA PACIFIC CORP HDWD SAMPLE TYPE: SOIL
STATION ID: 010-SD
CASE .NO.: 23679 SAS NO.:
PROG ELEM: NSF COLLECTED CITY: PLYMOUTH
COLLECTION START: 06/19/95
D. NO.: KA82
BY: D RUMFORD ST: NC
1620 STOP: 00/00/00
MD NO: KA82
•• •• •• •• •• *** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ***
5000J
***FOOTNOTES***
ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/KG
6 UNIDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS
*A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL *K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE .GIVEN
*U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
*R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
-·-••-----· ----------1!!!!!!!!1-· l!!!!!!!!l-l!!!!l!!l-1!1!111-· --!!!!!!1-!!!!!!I~-------:-·
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT-SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA.
MISCELLANEOUS EXTRACTABLE COMPOUNDS -DATA REPORT
08/15/95
*** * * *. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *** **
**
**
**
**
PROJECT NO. 95-0293 SAMPLE NO. 95461
SOURCE, GA PACIFIC CORP HDWD SAMPLE TYPE, SOIL
STATION ID, 109-SD
CASE.NO., 23679 SAS NO.,
PROG ELEM, NSF COLLECTED CITY, PLYMOUTH
COLLECTION START, 06/19/95 D. NO., KA84
BY, D RUMFORD ST, NC
1425 STOP, 00/00/00 MD NO, KA84
**
**
** **
** *** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *. * * * ***
lOOOOJ
***FOOTNOTES***
ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/KG
3 UNIDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS
*A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE. *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
*K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
*U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
*R-QC INDICATES.THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
-· --· 11!!!!!!1-11!1!!!1-· --· 1!!1!!1---liiillil iiii liiliil - ----- ---
I -I
I
I .
I I
I
I
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Region IV
Environmental Services Division
College Station Road, Athens, Ga. 30613
g.***MEMORANDUM*****~
I
n DATE: 08/16/95
' SUBJECT: n
•. FROM:
Results
95-0293
of 1 Pesticide/PCB Analysis;
GA PACIFIC CORP HDWD
PLYMOUTH NC I{ _;?,,SE N~: 23679
arles H.· ~fv
hief, Laboratory Evaluation/Quality Assurance Section
TO: PAT DEROSA
I
I
Attached are the results of analysis of samples collected as part of fie subject project.
AJ a result of the Quality Assurance Review, certain data qualifiers ir'.Y have been placed on the data. Attached is a DATA QUALIFIER
rPORT which explains, the reasons that these qualifiers were required.
I
If you have any questions please contact me. 1: .
1:
I I:
I
I
I
ATTACHMENT
I
d
D
• I
I:
I
1:
'
I!
I
I:
I
I
I
I,
I
I
I
I
I
ORGANIC DATA QUALIFIER REPORT
Case Number 23679 Project Number 95-0293
Site ID.' Georgia Pacific Corp HDIJD, Plymouth, NC
SAS Number
Affected Sampl:es
Volatiles
all samples
95446
95447,95453,
95455
Extractables
~o~ 95445,95446
95447,95450,
95452,95454,
95456,95458,
95460,95462
95448
95451
95453,95455,
95459
95455
95457
95461
Compound or Fraction
chloromethane
benzene
toluene
chlorobenzene
2-butanone
all compounds
pyrene
benzo(g,h,i)perylene
pyrene
di-n-octylphthalate
benzo(b/k)fluoranthene
benzo(a)pyrene
indeno(l,2,3-cd)pyrene
dibenz(a,h)anthracene
benzo(g,h,i)perylene
pyrene .
benzo(b/k)fluoranthene
benzo(g,h,i)perylene
fluoranthene
pyrene
benzo(b/k)fluoranthene
benzo(g,h,i)perylene
benzo(a)pyrene
chrysene
phenanthrene
fluoranthene
pyrene
chrysene
benzo(a)pyrene
indeno(l,2,3-cd)pyrene
benzo(g,h,i)perylene
fluoranthene
pyrene
chrysene
benzo(b/k)fluoranthene
benzo(a)pyrene
benzo(g,h,i)perylene
R
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
Flag
Used Reason
unacceptable PE sample recovery
< quantitation limit
< quantitation limit
< quantitation limit
< quantitation limit
exceeded extraction holding time
low PE sample recovery
low PE sample recovery
low PE sample recovery
low internal standard recovery
low internal standard recovery
low internal standard recovery
low internal standard recovery
low internal standard recovery
low internal standard recovery
< quantitation limit
< quantitation limit
low PE sample recovery
< quantitation limit
< quantitation limit
< quantitation limit
low PE sample recovery
< quan ti ta tion limit
< quantitation limit
< quantitation limit
< qunatitation limit
< quantitation limit
< quantitation limit
< quantitation limit
< quantitation limit
< quantitation limit
< quantitation limit
< quantitation limit
< quantitation limit
< quantitation limit
< quantitation limit
low PE sample recovery
I
I
I '
I
I
I
I I
I oc>
I 0""
'
I
I
I
I '
I
I
I
:1
I
I
II
;I
,1
:I
'
ORGANIC DATA QUALIFIER REPORT
Case Number 23679
Affected Samples Compound or Fraction
Pesticides
all samples
95445,95446
95447
95454
95455
95457
95459
aroclor-1016
alpha-bhc
delta-bhc
gamma-bhc
4,4'-DDE
4,4'-DDT
beta-bhc
4,4' -ODE
delta-bhc
gamma-bhc
endrin aldehyde
4,4'-DDE
Project Number 95-0293
Flag
Used
R
C
C
C
J
J
J
J
J
N
J
J
J
N
Reason
unacceptable PE sample recovery
GC/MS confirmed
GC/MS confirmed
GC/MS confirmed
< quantitation limit
< quantitation limit
< qua!}titation limit
< quantitation limit
< quantitation limit
difference in column
quantitations
< quantitation limit < quantitation limit
< quantitation limit
difference in column
quantitations
PESTICIDES/PCB'S DATA REPORT
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA. 08/15/95
*** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *** •• •• •• •• ••
PROJECT NO. 95-0293 SAMPLE NO. 95445
SOURCE, GA PACIFIC CORP HDWD
STATION ID, 007-SL /
CASE NUMBER, 23679 SAS NUMBER,
SAMPLE TYPE, SOIL PROG ELEM, NSF COLLECTED
CITY, PLYMOUTH
COLLECTION START, 06/20/95 D. NUMBER, KA86
BY, D RUMFORD
ST, NC
0900 STOP, 00/00/00
•• •• •• •• • • *** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *** UG/KG ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/KG ANALYTICAL RESULTS
31000C ALPHA-BHC 8300U METHOXYCHLOR 12000U BETA-BHC 1600U ENDRIN KETONE 48000C DELTA-BHC 1600U ENDRIN ALDEHYDE 72000C GAMMA-BHC (LINDANE) CHLORDANE (TECH. MIXTURE) /1 830U HEPTACHLOR .830U GAMMA-CHLORDANE /2 830U ALDRIN 830U ALPHA-CHLORDANE /2 830U HEPTACHLOR EPOXIDE 83000U TOXAPHENE 830U ENDOSULFAN I (ALPHA) 16000UR PCB-1016 (AROCLOR 1016) 1600U DIELDRIN 33000U PCB-1221 (AROCLOR 1221) 1600U 4,4' -ODE (P, P' -DDE) 16000U PCB-1232 (AROCLOR 1232) 1600U ENDRIN 16000U PCB-1242 (AROCLOR 1242) 1600U ENDOSULFAN II (BETA) 16000U PCB-1248 (AROCLOR 1248) 1600U 4,4' -DOD (P, P' -DOD) 16000U PCB-1254 (AROCLOR 1254) 1600U ENDOSULFAN SULFATE 16000U PCB-1260 (AROCLOR 1260) 1600U 4,4'-DDT (P,P'-DDT) 59 PERCENT MOISTURE
***REMARKS*** ***REMARKS••~
***FOOTNOTES***
*A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF.PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
*K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN *U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT ..
*R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
*C-CONFIRMED BY GCMS 1. WHEN NO VALUE IS REPORTED, SEE CHLORDANE CONSTITUENTS.
2. CONSTITUENTS OR METABOLITES OF TECHNICAL CHLORDANE.
---==---liiiiil iiil ---- -- -- -- ----
PESTICIDES/PCB'S DATA REPORT
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA. 08/15/95
*** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *** ** **
**
**
**
**
**
** ** **
PROJECT NO. 95-0293 SAMPLE NO. 95446
SOURCE, GA PACIFIC CORP HDWD
STATION ID, 107-SL ✓
CASE NUMBER, 23679 SAS NUMBER,
SAMPLE TYPE, SOIL PROG ELEM, NSF COLLECTED CITY, PLYMOUTH
COLLECTION START, 06/20/95
D. NUMBER, KA87
BY, D RUMFORD
ST, NC
0900 STOP, 00/00/00
*** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ·* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *** UG/KG ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/KG ANALYTICAL RESULTS
55000C ALPHA-BHC 9200U METHOXYCHLOR 3600U BETA-BHC 1800U ENDRIN KETONE 00000c DELTA-BHC 1800U ENDRIN ALDEHYDE 130000C GAMMA-BHC (LINDANE) CHLORDANE (TECH. MIXTURE) /1 920U HEPTACHLOR 920U GAMMA-CHLORDANE /2 920U ALDRIN 920U ALPHA-CHLORDANE /2 920U HEPTACHLOR EPOXIDE 92000U TOXAPHENE 920U ENDOSULFAN I (ALPHA) 18000UR PCB-1016 (AROCLOR 1016) 1800U DIELDRIN 36000U PCB-1221 (AROCLOR 1221) 1800U 4,4'-DDE (P,P' -DOE) 18000U PCB-1232 (AROCLOR 1232). 1800U ENDRIN 18000U PCB-1242 (AROCLOR 1242) 1800U ENDOSULFAN II (BETA) 18000U PCB-1248 (AROCLOR 1248) 1800U 4,4' -ODD (P, P' -DOD) 18000U PCB-1254 (AROCLOR 1254) 1800U ENDOSULFAN SULFATE 18000U PCB-1260 (AROCLOR 1260) 1800U 4,4' -DDT (P, P' -DDT) 63 PERCENT MOISTURE
***REMARKS*** ***REMARKS***
***FOOTNOTES***
*A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
*K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
*U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER rs THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
*R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION. *C-CONFIRMED BY GCMS 1. WHEN NO VALUE IS REPORTED, SEE CHLORDANE CONSTITUENTS. 2. CONSTITUENTS OR METABOLITES OF TECHNICAL CHLORDANE.
liiiil - ---- - -- - ---
PESTICIDES/PCB'S DATA REPORT
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA. 08/15/95
*** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *** •• •• •• • • ••
•• •• •• •• ••
PROJECT NO. 95-0293 SAMPLE NO. 95447
SOURCE, GA PACIFIC CORP HDWD·
STATION ID, 003-SL ✓
CASE NUMBER, 23679 SAS NUMBER,
SAMPLE TYPE, SOIL PROG ELEM, NSF COLLECTED
CITY, PLYMOUTH
COLLECTION START, 06/20/95 D. NUMBER, KA88
BY, D RUMFORD
ST, NC
0950 STOP, 00/00/00
*** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *** UG/KG ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/KG ANALYTICAL RESULTS
2.2U ALPHA-BHC 22U METHOXYCHLOR 2.2U BETA-BHC 4 .2U ENDRIN KETONE 2.2U DELTA-BHC 4.2U ENDRIN ALDEHYDE 2.2U GAMMA-BHC (LINDANE) CHLORDANE (TECH. MIXTURE) /1 2.2U HEPTACHLOR 2.2U GAMMA-CHLORDANE /2 2.2U ALDRIN 2.2U ALPHA-CHLORDANE /2 2.2U HEPTACHLOR EPOXIDE 220U TOXAPHENE 2.2U ENDOSULFAN I (ALPHA) 42UR PCB-1016 (AROCLOR 1016) 4 .2U · DIELDRIN 85U PCB-1221 (AROCLOR 1221) 1. 7J 4,4'-DDE (P,P'-DDE) 42U PCB-1232 (AROCLOR 1232) 4 .2U ENDRIN 42U PCB-1242 (AROCLOR 1242) 4 .2U ENDOSULFAN II (BETA) 42U PCB-1248 (AROCLOR 1248) 4 .2U 4,4' -ODD (P, P' -ODD) 42U PCB-1254 (AROCLOR 1254) 4 .2U ENDOSULFAN SULFATE 42U PCB-1260 (AROCLOR 1260) l.9J 4,4' -DDT (P,P'-DDT) 21 PERCENT MOISTURE
***REMARKS*** ***REMARKS***
***FOOTNOTES***
*A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL *K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
*U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
*R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
*C-CONFIRMED BY GCMS 1. WHEN NO VALUE IS REPORTED, SEE CHLORDANE CONSTITUENTS. 2. CONSTITUENTS OR METABOLITES OF TECHNICAL CHLORDANE.
liilii iilii ---- --- -- - ---
PESTICIDES/PCB'S DATA REPORT
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA.
*** * * •• * *. * * * * * •• * * * * * * * * * *. * * * * * * * * * *·*. * * * * * ••••••• *. * * * * * * * **
** **
**
**
PROJECT NO. 95-0293 SAMPLE NO. 95448
SOURCE: GA PACIFIC CORP HDWD
STATION ID: 005-SL
CASE NUMBER: 23679 SAS NUMBER:
SAMPLE TYPE: SOIL FROG ELEM: NSF COLLECTED
CITY: PLYMOUTH COLLECTION START: 06/20/95 D. NUMBER: KA89
BY: D RUMFORD
ST: NC
1020 STOP: 00/00/00
08/15/95
• * * * *** **
**
**
** **
***. * * * * * ••• * •• * * * * * * * * *. * *. * * * * * *. * * •• *. * •• *. * * * *. * * •• * * * * * •••• * *** UG/KG ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/KG ANALYTICAL RESULTS
14U ALPHA-BHC 140U METHOXYCHLOR
14U BETA-BHC 27U ENDRIN KETONE 14U DELTA-BHC 27U ENDRIN ALDEHYDE
14U GAMMA-BHC (LINDANE) CHLORDANE (TECH. MIXTURE) /1 14U. HEPTACHLOR 14U GAMMA-CHLORDANE /2
14U ALDRIN 15 ALPHA-CHLORDANE /2
14U HEPTACHLOR EPOXIDE 1400U TOXAPHENE 14U ENDOSULFAN I (ALPHA) 270UR PCB-1016 (AROCLOR 1016)
27U DIELDRIN 550U PCB-1221 (AROCLOR 1221)
27U 4,4'-DDE (P, P' -DOE) 270U PCB-1232 (AROCLOR 1232)
27U ENDRIN 270U PCB-1242 (AROCLOR 1242)
27U ENDOSULFAN II (BETA) 270U PCB-1248 (AROCLOR 1248)
27U 4, 4' -ODD (P, P' -DOD) 270U PCB-1254 (AROCLOR 1254) 27U ENDOSULFAN SULFATE 270U PCB-1260 (AROCLOR 1260)
27U 4,4'-DDT (P, P' -DDT) 40 PERCENT MOISTURE
***REMARKS*** ***REMARKS***
***FOOTNOTES***
*A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
*K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
*U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
*R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
*C-CONFIRMED BY GCMS 1. WHEN NO VALUE IS REPORTED, SEE CHLORDANE CONSTITUENTS.
2 .. CONSTITUENTS OR METABOLITES OF TECHNICAL CHLORDANE.
-----·-- -- - ---
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS· MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
PESTICIDES/PCB'S DATA REPORT EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA. 08/15/95
***. * *. * ••• * ••• * * ••• * * * * * * •• * * *. * * * * * * * * * * * * * ••• * * *. * * * * * * * * * * *. * *** •• •• •• •• ••
PROJECT NO. 95-0293 SAMPLE NO. 95449 SOURCE, GA PACIFIC CORP HDWD
STATION ID, 006-SL /
CASE NUMBER, 23679 SAS NUMBER,
SAMPLE TYPE, SOIL PROG ELEM, NSF COLLECTED
CITY, PLYMOUTH
COLLECTION START, 06/20/95
D. NUMBER, KA90
BY, D RUMFORD
ST, NC
1040 STOP, 00/00/00
** •• •• • • •• *** ••••• *. * *. * * *. * * *. * * * * * *. *. * * * * * * * * * * * •• * * * * * * *. * * * * * •• * * *. *. * *** UG/KG ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/KG ANALYTICAL RESULTS
NA ALPHA-BHC NA METHOXYCHLOR NA BETA-BHC NA ENDRIN KETONE NA DELTA-BHC NA ENDRIN ALDEHYDE NA GAMMA-BHC (LINDANE) CHLORDANE (TECH. MIXTURE) /1 NA HEPTACHLOR NA GAMMA-CHLORDANE /2 NA ALDRIN NA ALPHA-CHLORDANE /2 NA HEPTACHLOR EPOXIDE NA TOXAPHENE NA ENDOSULFAN I (ALPHA) NA PCB-1016 (AROCLOR 1016) NA DIELDRIN NA PCB-1221 (AROCLOR 1221) NA 4,4'-DDE (P, P' -DOE) NA PCB-1232 (AROCLOR 1232) NA ENDRIN NA PCB-1242 (AROCLOR 1242) NA ENDOSULFAN II (BETA) NA PCB-1248 (AROCLOR 1248) NA 4,4' -DOD (P,P'-DDD) NA PCB-1254 (AROCLOR 1254) NA ENDOSULFAN SULFATE NA PCB-1260 (AROCLOR 1260) NA 4,4'-DDT (P, P' -DDT) PERCENT MOISTURE
***REMARKS*** ***REMARKS*** NO SAMPLE CONTAINER RECEIVED
***FOOTNOTES***
*A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
*K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
*U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED .. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
*R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
*C-CONFIRMED BY GCMS 1. WHEN NO VALUE IS REPORTED, SEE CHLORDANE CONSTITUENTS. 2. CONSTITUENTS OR METABOLITES OF TECHNICAL CHLORDANE. ----------· --- ------
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
PESTICIDES/PCB'S DATA REPORT
EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA. 08/15/95
••• * * * *. * * * * * * * * * * •• •• •• •• ••
PROJECT NO. 95-0293 SAMPLE NO. 95450
SOURCE, GA PACIFIC CORP HDWD
STATION ID, 001-SW,
CASE NUMBER, 23679 SAS NUMBER,
SAMPLE TYPE, SURFACEWA PROG ELEM, NSF COLLECTED
CITY, PLYMOUTH
COLLECTION START, 06/20/95 D. NUMBER, KA91
BY, D RUMFORD
ST, NC
1015 STOP, 00/00/00
•• •• •• • • ••
*** * * * * * * * * * * ·• * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *. * * * *** UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS
o.osou ALPHA-BHC a.sou METHOXYCHLOR o.osou BETA-BHC O.lOU ENDRIN KETONE o.osou DELTA-BHC O.lOU ENDRIN ALDEHYDE o.osou GAMMA-BHC (LINDANE) CHLORDANE (TECH. MIXTURE) /1 o.osou HEPTACHLOR o.osou GAMMA-CHLORDANE /2 o.osou ALDRIN o.osou ALPHA-CHLORDANE /2 o.osou HEPTACHLOR EPOXIDE s.ou TOXAPHENE o.osou ENDOSULFAN I (ALPHA) 1.0UR PCB-1016 (AROCLOR 1016)
O.lOU DIELDRIN 2.0U PCB-1221 (AROCLOR 1221) O.lOU 4,4'-DDE (P, P' -DDE) 1.0U PCB-1232 (AROCLOR 1232)
O.lOU ENDRIN 1.0U PCB-1242 (AROCLOR 1242)
O.lOU ENDOSULFAN II (BETA) 1.0U PCB-1248 (AROCLOR 1248)
O.lOU 4, 4' -DOD (P, P' -DDD) 1.0U PCB-1254 (AROCLOR 1254)
O.lOU ENDOSULFAN SULFATE 1.0U PCB-1260 (AROCLOR 1260)
O.lOU 4,4'-DDT (P,P' -DDT)
***FOOTNOTES***
*A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL *K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
*U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
*R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
--•C-CONFIRMED-BY-GGMS--------1.-WHEN-NO_VALUE_IS_REPORTED,_SEE~C~H=L=O=R~D~AN=E=-C=O=N=S=T=I.=T.=U.=Ec.NT=S'-'.'-----------------------2. CONSTITUENTS OR METABOLITES OF TECHNICAL CHLORDANE. --- - ----- ----- - ---
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
PESTICIDES/PCB'S DATA REPORT EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA. 08/15/95
*** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *. *** •• •• •• •• ••
PROJECT NO. 95-0293 SAMPLE NO. 95451
SOURCE, GA PACIFIC CORP HDWD
STATION ID, 001-SD,
CASE NUMBER, 23679 SAS NUMBER,
SAMPLE TYPE, SOIL FROG ELEM, NSF COLLECTED
CITY, PLYMOUTH
COLLECTION START, 06/20/95 D. NUMBER, KA92
BY, D RUMFORD
ST, NC
1020 STOP, 00/00/00
•• •• •• • • •• *** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *** UG/KG ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/KG ANALYTICAL RESULTS
21U ALPHA-BHC 210U METHOXYCHLOR 21U BETA-BHC 41U ENDRIN KETONE 21U DELTA-BHC 41U ENDRIN ALDEHYDE 21U GAMMA-BHC (LINDANE) CHLORDANE (TECH. MIXTURE) /1 21U HEPTACHLOR 21U GAMMA-CHLORDANE /2 21U ALDRIN 21U ALPHA-CHLORDANE /2 21U HEPTACHLOR EPOXIDE 2100U TOXAPHENE 21U ENDOSULFAN I (ALPHA) 410UR PCB-10t6 (AROCLOR 1016) 41U DIELDRIN 840U PCB-1221· (AROCLOR 1221) 41U 4,4'-DDE (P, P' -ODE) 410U PCB-1232 (AROCLOR 1232) 41U ENDRIN 410U PCB-1242 (AROCLOR 1242) 41U ENDOSULFAN II (BETA) 410U PCB-1248 (AROCLOR 1248) 41U 4,4' -DOD (P, P' -ODD) 410U PCB-1254 (AROCLOR 1254) 41U ENDOSULFAN SULFATE 410U PCB-1260 (AROCLOR 1260) 41U 4,4'-DDT (P,P'-DDT) 60 PERCENT MOISTURE
***FOOTNOTES***
*A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
*K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
*U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
*R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION. --.-*Ca.CONF.IRMED_B.Y GCMS . 1. WHEN NO VALUE IS REPORTED, SEE CHLORDANE CONSTITUENTS.
2. CONSTITUENTS OR METABOLITES-OF-TECHNICAL-CHLORDANE7.-----------------------------'--------------
-- ---- -- - - --- -
PESTICIDES/PCB'S DATA REPORT
*** * * •• * * * * * * * * * *. * * * * * •• •• •• •• ••
PROJECT NO. 95-0293 SAMPLE NO. 95452 SOURCE: GA PACIFIC CORP HDWD
STATION ID: 101-SW
CASE NUMBER: 23679 SAS NUMBER:
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA. 08/15/95
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *** SAMPLE TYPE: SURFACEWA PROG ELEM: NSF COLLECTED CITY: PLYMOUTH
COLLECTION START: 06/20/95
D. NUMBER: KA93
BY: D RUMFORD
ST: NC
1015 STOP: 00/00/00
•• •• •• •• •• *** * * *. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *** UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS
o.osou ALPHA-BHC a.sou METHOXYCHLOR o.osou BETA-BHC O.lOU ENDRIN KETONE o.osou DELTA-BHC O.lOU ENDRIN ALDEHYDE o.osou GAMMA-BHC (LINDANE) CHLORDANE (TECH. MIXTURE) /1 o.osou HEPTACHLOR o.osou GAMMA-CHLORDANE /2 o.osou ALDRIN o.osou ALPHA-CHLORDANE /2 o.osou HEPTACHLOR EPOXIDE 5.0U TOXAPHENE o.osou ENDOSULFAN I (ALPHA) 1.0UR PCB-1016 (AROCLOR 1016) O.lOU DIELDRIN ' 2.0U PCB-1221 (AROCLOR 1221) O.lOU 4, 4' -ODE (P, P' -DDE) l.OU PCB-1232 (AROCLOR 1232) O.lOU ENDRIN l.OU PCB-1242 (AROCLOR 1242) O.lOU ENDOSULFAN II (BETA) l.OU PCB-1248 (AROCLOR 1248) O.lOU 4,4' -DOD (P, P' -DDD) l.OU PCB-1254 (AROCLOR 1254) O.lOU ENDOSULFAN SULFATE l.OU PCB-1260 (AROCLOR 1260) O.lOU 4,4'-DDT (P,P'-DDT)
***FOOTNOTES***
*A-AVERAGE VALUE ·•NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
*K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
*U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
*R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
--•C-CONFl'RMED-BY-GCMS--------1-.-WHEN-NO_VALUE_IS_REPORTED,_SEE_CHLORDANE_CONSTITU~E~NT=S~-~----------------------2. CONSTITUENTS OR METABOLITES OF TECHNICAL CHLORDANE. .. .
• -- ------------ ---,,,, ~ I
PESTICIDES/PCB'S DATA REPORT
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA.
*** •• *. * *. *. * •• * * *. * *. * * * *. * * * * •• * * * * * * * •• *. * *. * * * * * * * *. * * * * * * **
** **
**
**
PROJECT NO. 95-0293 SAMPLE NO. 95453
SOURCE: GA PACIFIC CORP HDWD
STATION ID: 101-SD..;
CASE NUMBER, 23679 SAS NUMBER,
SAMPLE TYPE: SOIL PROG ELEM: NSF COLLECTED
CITY, PLYMOUTH
COLLECTION START: 06/20/95 D. NUMBER, KA94
BY, D RUMFORD
ST, NC
1020 STOP: 00/00/00
08/15/95
*. * *** **
**
**
**
** ***. * * ••••••••• * * * * •• * *. * * *. *. *. * * * * * * * * *. * *. *-* *. *. * * * * * * *. *. * * *. *** UG/KG ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/KG ANALYTICAL RESULTS
3.6U ALPHA-BHC 36U METHOXYCHLOR 3.6U BETA-BHC 7.lU ENDRIN KETONE 3.6U DELTA-BHC 7 .lU ENDRIN ALDEHYDE 3.6U GAMMA-BHC (LINDANE) CHLORDANE (TECH. MIXTURE) /1 3.6U HEPTACHLOR 3.6U GAMMA-CHLORDANE /2 3 .6U ALDRIN 3 .6U ALPHA-CHLORDANE /2 3.6U HEPTACHLOR EPOXIDE 360U TOXAPHENE 3.6U ENDOSULFAN I (ALPHA) 71UR PCB-1016 (AROCLOR 1016) 7.lU DIELDRIN 1400 PCB-1221 (AROCLOR 1221) 7 .lU 4, 4' -DOE (P, P' -DDE) 71U PCB-1232 (AROCLOR 1232) 7.lU ENDRIN 71U PCB-1242 (AROCLOR 1242) 7.lU ENDOSULFAN II (BETA) 71U PCB-1248 (AROCLOR 1248) 7.lU 4, 4' -DOD (P, P' -ODD) 71U PCB-1254 (AROCLOR 1254) 7.lU ENDOSULFAN SULFATE 71U PCB-1260 (AROCLOR 1260) 7.lU 4,4' -DDT (P, P' -DDT) 54 PERCENT MOISTURE
***FOOTNOTES***
*A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
*K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
*U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS.THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
*R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
*C-CONFIRMED BY GCMS 1. WHEN NO VALUE IS REPORTED, SEE CHLORDANE CONSTITUENTS.
2. CONSTITUENTS OR METABOLITES OF TECHNICAL CHLORDANE.
PESTICIDES/PCB'S DATA REPORT
SAMPLE AND-ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA. 08/15/95
*** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * -* * .• * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *** •• •• •• •• ••
PROJECT NO. 95-0293 SAMPLE NO. 95454 SOURCE: GA PACIFIC CORP HDWD SAMPLE TYPE: SOIL
STATION ID: 004-SL -
CASE NUMBER: 23679 SAS NUMBER:
PROG ELEM: NSF COLLECTED
CITY: PLYMOUTH
COLLECTION START: 06/20/95
D. NUMBER: KA95
BY: D RUMFORD
ST: NC
1125 STOP: 00/00/00
*** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ·* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *** UG/KG
•• •• •• •• • •
ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/KG ANALYTICAL RESULTS
11 ALPHA-BHC 110U METHOXYCHLOR 6.7J BETA-BHC 20U ENDRIN KETONE 11U DELTA-BHC 20U ENDRIN ALDEHYDE 21 GAMMA-BHC (LINDANE) CHLORDANE (TECH. MIXTURE) /1 11U HEPTACHLOR 11U GAMMA-CHLORDANE /2 11U ALDRIN 11U ALPHA-CHLORDANE /2 11U HEPTACHLOR EPOXIDE 1100U TOXAPHENE 11U ENDOSULFAN I (ALPHA) 200UR PCB-1016 (AROCLOR 1016) 20U DIELDRIN 410U PCB-1221 (AROCLOR 1221) 20U 4,4' -ODE (P,P' -DOE) 200U PCB-1232 (AROCLOR 1232) 20U ENDRIN 200U PCB-1242 (AROCLOR 1242) 20U ENDOSULFAN II (BETA) 200U PCB-1248 (AROCLOR 1248) 20U 4,4' -DOD (P, P' -DOD) 600 PCB-1254 (AROCLOR 1254) 20U ENDOSULFAN SULFATE 200U PCB-1260 (AROCLOR 1260) 20U 4,4'-DDT (P,P' -DDT) 20 PERCENT MOISTURE
***FOOTNOTES***
*A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
*K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
*U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
*R-QC INDICATES THAT·DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION. *C-CONFIRMED BY GCMS 1. WHEN NO VALUE IS REPORTED, SEE CHLORDANE CONSTITUENTS. 2. CONSTITUENTS OR METABOLITES OF TECHNICAL CHLORDANE.
PESTICIDES/PCB'S DATA REPORT
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV.ESD, ATHENS, GA. 08/15/95
*** * *. * * *. * *. * * * * *. *. * *. * * * * * * *. * * * * *. * * •• * * * * * * * •• * *. * * * * •• * * * •• *** •• •• •• •• ••
PROJECT NO. 95-0293 SAMPLE NO. 95455
SOURCE, GA PACIFIC CORP IIDWD
STATION ID, 002-SL,
CASE NUMBER, 23679 SAS NUMBER,
SAMPLE TYPE, SOIL PROG ELEM, NSF COLLECTED
CITY, PLYMOUTH
COLLECTION START, 06/20/95 D. NUMBER, KAA96
BY, D RUMFORD ST, NC
1155 STOP, 00/00/00
•• •• •• •• • • *** * * * * *. *. * * * * * * * * *. * •• * * * *. * * *. * *. * •• * * * * * *. *. * * * ••• * * * * * *. * * * * *** UG/KG ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/KG ANALYTICAL RESULTS
.5 .5 ALPHA-BHC 29U METHOXYCHLOR 2.9U BETA-BHC 5.7U ENDRIN KETONE 8.6 DELTA-BHC 5.7U ENDRIN ALDEHYDE 12 GAMMA-BHC (LINDANE) CHLORDANE (TECH. MIXTURE) /1 2.9U HEPTACHLOR 2.9U GAMMA-CHLORDANE /2 2.9U ALDRIN 2.9U ALPHA-CHLORDANE /2 2.9U HEPTACHLOR EPOXIDE 290U TOXAPHENE 2.9U ENDOSULFAN I (ALPHA) 57UR PCB-1016 (AROCLOR 1016) 5. 7U DIELDRIN 120U PCB-1221 (AROCLOR 1221) 3.5J 4, 4' -DOE (P, P' -DDE) 57U PCB-1232 (AROCLOR 1232) 5. 7U ENDRIN 57U PCB-1242 (AROCLOR 1242) 5. 7U ENDOSULFAN II (BETA) 57U PCB-1248 (AROCLOR 1248) 5. 7U 4,4'-DDD (P, P' -DDD) 57U PCB-1254 (AROCLOR 1254) 5.7U ENDOSULFAN SULFATE 57U PCB-1260 (AROCLOR 1260) 5.7U 4,4'-DDT (P, P' -DDT) 42 PERCENT MOISTURE
***FOOTNOTES***
*A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL *K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN *U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
*R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
*C-CONFIRMED BY GCMS 1. WHEN NO VALUE IS REPORTED, SEE CHLORDANE CONSTITUENTS.
2. CONSTITUENTS OR METABOLITES OF TECHNICAL CHLORDANE.
PESTICIDES/PCB'S DATA REPORT
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA. 08/15/95
*** * * * •••• *. *. * *. * * * *. * * ••• *. *. * * * * •• *. *. * *. * ••• * *. * * * * * *. * *. *. * * *** ** **
**
**
**
PROJECT NO. 95-0293 SAMPLE NO. 95456 SOURCE, GA PACIFIC CORP HDWD STATION ID, 009-SW _,.
CASE NUMBER, 23679 SAS NUMBER,
SAMPLE TYPE, SURFACEWA PROG ELEM, NSF COLLECTED
CITY, PLYMOUTH
COLLECTION START, 06/19/95 D. NUMBER, KA79
BY, D RUMFORD
ST, NC
1350 STOP, 00/00/00
**
**
**
**
** ••• * * * * ••• * * * * * *. * * * •• * * * * ••• * *. * * * *. * * * * * * * * * * *. * * * * *. * * * * *. * *. * *** UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS
o.osou ALPHA-BHC a.sou METHOXYCHLOR o.osou BETA-BHC 0.10U ENDRIN KETONE o.osou DELTA-BHC 0.10U ENDRIN ALDEHYDE o.osou GAMMA-BHC (LINDANE) CHLORDANE (TECH. MIXTURE) /1 o.osou HEPTACHLOR o.osou GAMMA-CHLORDANE /2 o.osou ALDRIN o.osou ALPHA-CHLORDANE /2 o.osou HEPTACHLOR EPOXIDE 5.0U TOXAPHENE o.osou ENDOSULFAN I (ALPHA) 1.0UR PCB-1016 (AROCLOR 1016) 0.10U DIELDRIN 2.0U PCB-1221 (AROCLOR 1221) 0.10U 4, 4' -DOE (P,P'-DDE) 1.0U PCB-1232 (AROCLOR 1232) 0.10U ENDRIN 1.0U PCB-1242 (AROCLOR 1242) 0.10U ENDOSULFAN II (BETA) 1.0U PCB-1248 (AROCLOR 1248) 0.10U 4,4'-DDD (P, P' -DDD) 1.0U PCB-1254 (AROCLOR 1254) 0.10U ENDOSULFAN SULFATE 1.0U PCB-1260 (AROCLOR 1260) 0.10U 4,4'-DDT (P, P' -DDT)
***FOOTNOTES***
*A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
*K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN .
*U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
*R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
*C-CONFIRMED BY GCMS 1. WHEN NO VALUE IS REPORTED, SEE CHLORDANE CONSTITUENTS.
2. CONSTITUENTS OR METABOLITES OF TECHNICAL CHLORDANE.
-- --·--- -
iili liilla
PESTICIDES/PCB'S DATA REPORT
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA.
*** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * •• •• •• •• ••
PROJECT NO. 95-0293 SAMPLE NO. 95457
SOURCE, GA PACIFIC CORP HDWD
STATION ID, 009-SD,
CASE NUMBER,. 23679 SAS NUMBER,
SAMPLE TYPE, SOIL PROG ELEM, NSF COLLECTED
CITY, PLYMOUTH
COLLECTION START, 06/19/95
D. NUMBER, KA80
BY, D RUMFORD
ST, NC
1425 STOP, 00/00/00
08/15/95
* * * * *** •• •• •• ••
*** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *** ••
UG/KG ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/KG ANALYTICAL RESULTS
21U ALPHA-BHC 210U METHOXYCHLOR 21U BETA-BHC 41U ENDRIN KETONE 3.7JN DELTA-BHC llJ ENDRIN ALDEHYDE 5 .3J GAMMA-BHC (LINDANE) CHLORDANE (TECH. MIXTURE) /1 21U HEPTACHLOR 21U GAMMA-CHLORDANE /2 21U ALDRIN 21U ALPHA-CHLORDANE /2 21U HEPTACHLOR EPOXIDE 2100U TOXAPHENE 21U ENDOSULFAN I (ALPHA) 410UR PCB-1016 (AROCLOR 1016) 41U DIELDRIN 820U PCB-1221 (AROCLOR 1221) 41U 4, 4' -DOE (P, P' -ODE) 410U PCB-1232 (AROCLOR 1232) 41U ENDRIN 410U PCB-1242 (AROCLOR 1242) 41U ENDOSULFAN II (BETA) 410U PCB-1248 (AROCLOR 1248) 41U 4,4'-DDD (P, P' -DOD) 410U PCB-1254 (AROCLOR 1254) 41U ENDOSULFAN SULFATE 410U PCB-1260 (AROCLOR 1260) 41U 4,4'-DDT (P,P'-DDT) 60 PERCENT MOISTURE
***FOOTNOTES***
*A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE. *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL.
*K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
*U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
*R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION. *C-CONFIRMED BY GCMS 1. WHEN NO VALUE IS REPORTED, SEE CHLORDANE CONSTITUENTS. 2. CONSTITUENTS OR METABOLITES OF TECHNICAL CHLORDANE.
liilR liiiill
PESTICIDES/PCB'S DATA REPORT
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA.
*** •• * •• *. * ••• *. * * *. * *. * * * * * * * * •• * * * * * * * * * * *. *. * * * * * •• *. * * * * * ** •• •• •• ••
PROJECT NO. 95-0293 SAMPLE NO. 95458
SOURCE: GA PACIFIC CORP HDWD
STATION ID: 010-SW /
CASE NUMBER: 23679 SAS NUMBER:
SAMPLE TYPE: SURFACEWA PROG ELEM: NSF COLLECTED
CITY: PLYMOUTH
COLLECTION START: 06/19/95 D. NUMBER: KA81
BY: D RUMFORD
ST: NC
1615 STOP: 00/00/00
08/15/95
* * * * *** ** ••
**
**
** *** *. * •• * •• * •• * * •• * * * * * * * •• * * * * * * * * * *. *. * * ••• * * * * * * * * * *. * *. * * * *. * *** UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS
0.050U ALPHA-BHC 0.50U METHOXYCHLOR 0.050U BETA-BHC O.lOU ENDRIN KETONE 0.050U DELTA-BHC O.lOU ENDRIN ALDEHYDE 0.050U GAMMA-BHC (LINDANE) CHLORDANE (TECH. MIXTURE) /1 0.050U HEPTACHLOR 0.050U GAMMA-CHLORDANE /2 0.050U ALDRIN 0.050U ALPHA-CHLORDANE /2 0.050U HEPTACHLOR EPOXIDE 5.0U TOXAPHENE 0.050U ENDOSULFAN I (ALPHA) l.OUR PCB-1016 (AROCLOR 1016) O.lOU DIELDRIN 2.0U PCB-1221 (AROCLOR 1221) O.lOU 4,4'-DDE. (P,P'-DDE) l.OU PCB-1232 (AROCLOR 1232) O.lOU ENDRIN l.OU PCB-1242 (AROCLOR 1242) O.lOU ENDOSULFAN II (BETA) l.OU PCB-1248 (AROCLOR 1248) O.lOU 4,4'-DDD (P,P'-DDD) l.OU PCB-1254 (AROCLOR 1254) O.lOU ENDOSULFAN SULFATE l.OU PCB-1260 (AROCLOR 1260) O.lOU 4,4' -DDT (P, P' -DDT)
***FOOTNOTES***
*A-AVERAGE VALUE· *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
*K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
*U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
*R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
*C-CONFIRMED BY GCMS 1. WHEN NO VALUE IS REPORTED, SEE CHLORDANE CONSTITUENTS. 2. CONSTITUENTS OR METABOLITES OF TECHNICAL CHLORDANE. (--·-- ---.. iiil ra;;a
PESTICIDES/PCB'S DATA REPORT
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA. 08/15/95
*** * * * *. * * * * *. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *** ** •• ** •• ••
PROJECT NO. 95-0293 SAMPLE NO. 95459
SOURCE, GA PACIFIC CORP HDWD
STATION ID, 010-SD /
CASE NUMBER, 23679 SAS NUMBER,
SAMPLE TYPE, SOIL PROG ELEM, NSF COLLECTED
CITY, PLYMOUTH
COLLECTION START, 06/19/95
D. NUMBER, KA82
BY, D RUMFORD
ST, NC
1620 STOP, 00/00/00
•• •• •• •• **
*** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *** UG/KG ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/KG ANALYTICAL RESULTS
16U ALPHA-BHC 160U METHOXYCHLOR
16U BETA-BHC 31U ENDRIN KETONE
16U DELTA-BHC 31U ENDRIN ALDEHYDE
16U GAMMA-BHC (LINDANE) CHLORDANE (TECH. MIXTURE) /1
16U HEPTACHLOR 16U GAMMA-CHLORDANE /2
16U ALDRIN 16U ALPHA-CHLORDANE /2
16U HEPTACHLOR EPOXIDE 1600U TOXAPHENE
16U ENDOSULFAN I (ALPHA) 310UR PCB-1016 (AROCLOR 1016)
31U DIELDRIN 630U PCB-1221 (AROCLOR 1221)
3.0JN 4,4' -DOE (P,P'-DDE) 310U PCB-1232 (AROCLOR 1232)
31U ENDRIN 310U PCB-1242 (AROCLOR 1242)
31U ENDOSULFAN II (BETA) 310U PCB-1248 (AROCLOR 1248)
31U 4,4' -DOD (P, P' -DOD) 310U PCB-1254 (AROCLOR 1254)
31U ENDOSULFAN SULFATE 310U PCB-1260 (AROCLOR 1260)
31U 4,4' -DDT (P, P' -DDT) 47 PERCENT MOISTURE
***FOOTNOTES***
*A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES *J~ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
*K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
.•U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
*R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
*C-CONFIRMED BY GCMS 1. WHEN NO VALUE IS REPORTED, SEE CHLORDANE CONSTITUENTS.
2. CONSTITUENTS OR METABOLITES OF TECHNICAL CHLORDANE.
' ~ '
- - -- ---iiii, lillil iiillil ==-------· 1!1!!!1----J!ll!lt
'
PESTICIDES/PCB'S DATA REPORT
*** * * * * * *. * * * * * * *. *. * * * * *
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * **
** ** ** ••
PROJECT NO. 95-0293 SAMPLE NO. 95460
SOURCE, GA PACIFIC CORP HDWD
SAMPLE TYPE, SURFACWA PROG ELEM, NSF COLLECTED
CITY, PLYMOUTH
BY, D RUMFORD
ST, NC
STATION ID, 109-SW ✓ CASE NUMBER, 23679 SAS NUMBER, COLLECTION START, 06/19/95 D. NUMBER, KA83 1350 STOP, 00/00/00
08/15/95
* * * * *** ** •• **
**
**
*** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *** UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS
0.050U ALPHA-BHC 0.50U METHOXYCHLOR
0.050U BETA-BHC 0.10U ENDRIN KETONE
0.050U DELTA-BHC 0.10U ENDRIN ALDEHYDE
0.050U GAMMA-BHC (LINDANE) CHLORDANE (TECH. MIXTURE) /1
0.050U HEPTACHLOR 0.050U GAMMA-CHLORDANE /2 o.osou ALDRIN 0.050U ALPHA-CHLORDANE /2
0.050U HEPTACHLOR EPOXIDE 5.0U TOXAPHENE
0.050U ENDOSULFAN I (ALPHA) 1.0UR PCB-1016 (AROCLOR 1016)
0.10U DIELDRIN 2.0U PCB-1221 (AROCLOR 1221)
0.10U 4, 4' -ODE (P, P' -DDE) 1.0U PCB-1232 (AROCLOR 1232)
0.10U ENDRIN 1.0U PCB-1242 (AROCLOR 1242)
0.10U ENDOSULFAN II (BETA) 1.0U PCB-1248 (AROCLOR 1248)
0.10U 4, 4' -DOD (P,P'-DDD) 1.0U PCB-1254 (AROCLOR 1254)
0.10U ENDOSULFAN SULFATE 1.0U PCB-1260 (AROCLOR 1260)
0.10U 4,4'-DDT (P, P' -DDT)
\
***FOOTNOTES***
*A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL *K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
*U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED.FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
*R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
*C-CONFIRMED BY GCMS 1. WHEN NO VALUE IS REPORTED, SEE CHLORDANE CONSTITUENTS.
2. CONSTITUENTS OR METABOLITES OF TECHNICAL CHLORDANE.
• liiiiii 'liiiiiil
PESTICIDES/PCB'S DATA REPORT
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA.
*** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * •• •• •• •• ••
PROJECT NO. 95-0293 SAMPLE NO. 95461
SOURCE, GA PACIFIC CORP HDWD STATION ID, 109-SD ✓
CASE NUMBER, 23679 SAS NUMBER,
SAMPLE TYPE, SOIL PROG ELEM, NSF COLLECTED
CITY, PLYMOUTH
COLLECTION START, 06/19/95
D . NUMBER , KAB 4
BY, D RUMFORD
ST, NC
1425 STOP, 00/00/00
08/15/95
* * * *** •• •• •• • • ••
*** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *** UG/KG ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/KG ANALYTICAL RESULTS
7.0U ALPHA-BHC 41U METHOXYCHLOR
4.lU BETA-BHC 8.0U ENDRIN KETONE
4.lU DELTA-BHC 8.0U ENDRIN ALDEHYDE
4.lU GAMMA-BHC (LINDANE) CHLORDANE (TECH. MIXTURE) /1
4.lU HEPTACHLOR 4.lU GAMMA-CHLORDANE /2
4.lU ALDRIN-4.lU ALPHA-CHLORDANE /2
4.lU HEPTACHLOR EPOXIDE 410U TOXAPHENE
4.lU ENDOSULFAN I (ALPHA) BOUR PCB-1016 (AROCLOR 1016)
8.0U DIELDRIN 160U PCB-1221 (AROCLOR 1221)
8.0U 4,4' -DOE (P,P'-DDE) BOU PCB-1232 (AROCLOR 1232)
8.0U ENDRIN BOU PCB-1242 (AROCLOR 1242)
8.0U ENDOSULFAN II (BETA) BOU PCB-1248 (AROCLOR 1248)
8.0U 4,4' -ODD (P, P' -DDD) BOU PCB-1254 (AROCLOR 1254)
8.0U ENDOSULFAN SULFATE BOU PCB-1260 (AROCLOR 1260)
8.0U 4,4' -DDT (P,P'-DDT) 59 PERCENT MOISTURE
***FOOTNOTES*** *A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT .ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
*K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
*U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
*R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
*C-CONFIRMED BY GCMS 1. WHEN NO VALUE IS REPORTED, SEE CHLORDANE CONSTITUENTS.
2. CONSTITUENTS OR METABOLITES OF TECHNICAL CHLORDANE.
liiiil
PESTICIDES/PCB'S DATA REPORT
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS,· GA.
*** * •• * •• *. * *. *. * * *. * * * * * *. * •• * *. * * *. * ••• *. * * * * * •• * * *. *. * * * * * •• •• •• •• ••
PROJECT NO. 95-0293 SAMPLE NO. 95462
SOURCE, GA PACIFIC CORP HDWD
STATION ID, 013-RN CASE NUMBER, 23679 SAS NUMBER,
SAMPLE TYPE, SURFACWA PROG ELEM, NSF COLLECTED
CITY, PLYMOUTH
COLLECTION START, 06/19/95 D. NUMBER, KA97
BY, D RUMFORD
ST, NC
0700 STOP, 00/00/00
08/15/95
* *. * *** •• •• •• • • •• ***. * * *. *. * * *. *. * * * •• * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *. * * * *. * * * * •• * * * * * * *. * * * * * * *. * *** UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS
o.osou ALPHA-BHC .sou METHOXYCHLOR o.osou BETA-BHC O.lOU ENDRIN KETONE o.osou DELTA-BHC O.lOU ENDRIN ALDEHYDE o.osou GAMMA-BHC (LINDANE) CHWRDANE (TECH. MIXTURE) /1 o.osou HEPTACHLOR o.osou GAMMA-CHWRDANE /2 o.osou ALDRIN o.osou ALPHA-CHLORDANE /2 o.osou HEPTACHLOR EPOXIDE 5.0U TOXAPHENE o.osou ENDOSULFAN I (ALPHA) l.OUR PCB-1016 (AROCLOR 1016)
O.lOU DIELDRIN 2.0U PCB-1221 (AROCLOR 1221)
O.lOU 4,4' -DOE (P, P' -DDE) 1.0U PCB-1232 (AROCLOR 1232)
O.lOU ENDRIN 1.0U PCB-1242 (AROCLOR 1242)
O.lOU ENDOSULFAN II (BETA) 1.0U PCB-1248. (AROCLOR 1248)
O.lOU 4,4' -DOD (P, P' -DDD) 1.0U PCB-1254 (AROCWR 1254)
O.lOU ENDOSULFAN SULFATE 1.0U PCB-1260 (AROCLOR 1260)
O.lOU 4,4' -DDT (P, P' -DDT)
***FOOTNOTES***
*A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
*K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
*U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
*R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
*C-CONFIRMED BY GCMS 1. WHEN NO VALUE IS REPORTED, SEE CHWRDANE CONSTITUENTS.
2. CONSTITUENTS OR METABOLITES OF TECHNICAL CHWRDANE.
•.
Ii
I
I
RECEIVED
AUG 2 21995
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Region IV
Environmental Services Division
College Station Road, Athens, Ga. 30613
_u,0 tRFUND SECTION
D
l***MEMORANDUM******
I . I DATE: 08/05/95
SUBJECT: I
I I FROM:
I
I
Results
95-0293
of Metals Analysis;
.GA PACIFIC CORP HDWD
PLYMOUTH NC
CASE NO: 23679
Charles H. Hooper#~/ c,ch;
Chief, Laboratory Evaluation/Qualfty
I TO: PAT DEROSA
Assurance Section
ltached are the results of analysis of samples collected as part of
ii.he subject project.
La result of the Quality Assurance Review, certain data qualifiers
~ay have been placed on the data. Attached is a DATA QUALIFIER
'PORT which explains the reasons that these qualifiers were required.
[f you have a.ny questions please contact me.
I
I I
I I ,1
I
ATTACHMENT
I
INORGANIC DATA QUALIFIERS REPORT I Case Number: _.2~3"6,_7,_9~-------------
Project Number:~9~5,_-~0"2~9,_3~-----------II Site: GA Pacific Corp Hdwd, Plymouth, NC
II Element Flag Samples Affected
A. Waters II Be, Cd, II Mn, V
Co, Cu,
Al, Ba, D Mg, Zn
Ca, Fe,
D
D
I
R.
D
H I
D
I
D I a
As
Pb
Hg
Cr
Pb
Pb
Se
Pb
Ni
Se
J All metals • 11
I
I I I
I
I
B. Soils
Be,
Mn,
Al,
Mg
Cd, Co,
V, Zn
Ba, Ca,
cu,
Fe,
u
u
J
J
J
J
J
u
u
J
J
J
J
u
u
All positives> IDL, but
< CRDL
All positives> IDL, but
< lOX contaminant level
All with Al or Fe
concentrations in solution
> 150,000 ug/L
All with Al or Fe
concentrations in solution
> 150,000 ug/L
All
All
MDKA93
MDKA81 & 83
MDKA79
MDKA91
MDKA91
MDKA83
All samples
All positives> IDL, but
< CRDL
All positives> IDL, but
< lOX contaminant level
Reason
Baseline instability
Positives in blanks
Suspected over correction as noted
in the contractor res
Suspected over correction as noted
in the contractor res
Matrix spike recovery= 69.5%
Blind spike recovery< warning limit
% RSC >
exposures
% RSD >
exposures
CRDL
% RSD >
exposures
CRDL
20% for
20% for
and results
20% for
and result
Only analysis of 2X
required by contract
analysis
Only analysis of 2X
required by contract
analysis
ICP multiple
ICP multiple
> IDL, but <
ICP multiple
> IDL, but <
CRDL standard
sow for ICP
CRDL standard
sow for ICP
Only analysis of 2X CRDL
required by contract SOW
analysis
standard
for ICP
Sample pH> 2.0 when received by the
laboratory for analysis
Baseline instability
Positives in blanks
I
rNORGANIC DATA QUALIFIERS REPORT (continued) I Case Number: _.2._,3,c6._7.!..£<9 _____________ _
' Project Number:~9~5~-~0~2=9=3 __________ _ I Sit/: GA Pacific Corp Hdwd. Plymouth. NC
Element flag Samples Affected
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I I
I I
I
I
I
I
I
Se J All with Al or Fe
Sb
Zn
Ba
Ca
Cd
Cr
Co
Cu
Mg
Mn
Ni
K
V
K
As
Sb
Ni
J
J
J
J
R
J
J
R
J
R
J
R
J
R
J
R
J
R
J
J
J
u
u
u
Concentrations in
> 140,000 ug/L
All
All
All
All positives
All negatives
All
All positives
All negatives
All positives
All negatives
All positives
All negatives
All positives
All negatives
All positives
All negatives
All positives
All negatives
All
All
MDKA86 & 87
MDKA82 & 92
MDKA89
MDKA87
solution
Reason
sllspected over correction
in the contractor res
as noted
Matrix spike recovery= 69%
·serial dilution percent difference=
12.8%
Blind spike recovery< warning limit
Blind spike recovery< action limit
Blind spike recovery< warning limit
Blind spike recovery< action limit
Blind spike recovery< action limit
Blind spike_recovery < action limit
Blind spike recovery< action limit
Blind spike recovery< action limit
Blind spike recovery< action limit
Blind spike recovery< warning limit
Blind spike recovery< action limit
% RSD > 20% for ICP multiple
exposures
% RSD >
exposures
CRDL
% RSD >
exposures
CRDL
% RSD >
exposures
CRDL
20% for ICP multiple
and results > IDL, but <
23% for ICP multiple
and results > IDL, but <
20% for ICP multiple
and results > IDL, but <
Ii
INORGANIC DATA QUALIFIERS REPORT (continued) I Case Nwnber: _,2.,,3,_,6,_7,_9._ ____________ _
Project Nwnber:_;;9~5!..=.!0~2~9~3a..._ __________ _
Site: GA Pacific Corp Hdwd, Plymouth, NC I Jlement Flaa
J
Samples Affected
MDKAB7, as; & 94
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
As
Sb
Ni
J
J
MDKA95
MDKA82, 86, 88, 90, 92, 94,
& 96
Reason
Only analysis of 2X CRDL
required by contract SOW
analysis
Only analysis of 2X CRDL
required by contract sow
analysis
standard
for ICP
standard
for ICP
Only analysis of 2X CRDL standard
required by contract SOW for ICP
analysis
METALS DATA REPORT
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA. 08/04/95
*** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *** **
** **
** **
PROJECT NO. 95-0293 SAMPLE NO. 95444
SOURCE, GA PACIFIC CORP HDWD
STATION ID, 017-PB
CASE NUMBER, 23679 SAS NUMBER,
SAMPLE TYPE, WATER PROG ELEM, NSF COLLECTED
CITY, PLYMOUTH
COLLECTION START, 06/20/95
MD NUMBER, KASS
BY, D RUMFORD
ST, NC
1800 STOP, 00/00/00
**
** **
**
**
*** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *** UG/L
20UJ
20UJ
4UJ
3UJ
lUJ
lU
20UJ
SUJ 2UJ
4UJ
lOUJ
3UJ
40UJ
ALUMINUM
ANTIMONY
ARSENIC
BARIUM
BERYLLIUM
CADMIUM
CALCIUM CHROMIUM
COBALT
COPPER
IRON
LEAD
MAGNESIUM
***REMARKS***
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
SAMPLE RECEIVED WITH A PH GREATER THAN 2
***FOOTNOTES***
UG/L
lUJ
O.lOUJ
SUJ
90UJ
3J
3UJ
llOJ
S.2U NA
3UJ
2UJ
MANGANESE
MERCURY
NICKEL
POTASSIUM
SELENIUM
SILVER
SODIUM
THALLIUM TIN
VANADIUM
ZINC
***REMARKS***
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
*A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
*K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
*U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
*R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
--- - - - --- ---- ----
METALS DATA REPORT
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA. 08/04/95
*** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *** **
** **
** **
PROJECT NO. 95-0293 SAMPLE NO. 95445
SOURCE, GA PACIFIC CORP HDWD
STATION ID, 007-SL v
CASE NUMBER, 23679 SAS NUMBER,
SAMPLE TYPE, SOIL PROG ELEM, NSF COLLECTED CITY, PLYMOUTH
COLLECTION START, 06/20/95 MD NUMBER, KA86
BY, D RUMFORD
ST, NC
0900 STOP, 00/00/00
**
** **
**
**
*** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *** MG/KG
820
6.2UJ
7
42J
0.27U
0.46UJ
2300J
23J
0.78UR
46
28000
26
lOOUJ
ALUMINUM
ANTIMONY
ARSENIC
BARIUM
BERYLLIUM
CADMIUM
CALCIUM
CHROMIUM
COBALT
COPPER
IRON
LEAD
MAGNESIUM
***FOOTNOTES***
ANALYTICAL RESULTS MG/KG
66J
0.12U
5.9J
91J
1.1U
1.2U
61
2 .4U
NA
5UJ
64J
60
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
MANGANESE
MERCURY
NICKEL
POTASSIUM
SELENIUM SILVER
SODIUM THALLIUM·
TIN
VANADIUM
ZINC
PERCENT MOISTURE
*A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
*K-ACTUAL VALUE IS. KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
*U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
*R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
--- - ---- - - ----- --
METALS DATA REPORT
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA. 08/04/95
*** * * * * * * * * * * *. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *** **
**
**
**
**
PROJECT NO. 95-0293 SAMPLE NO. 95446
SOURCE: GA PACIFIC CORP HDWD
STATION ID: 107-SL CASE NUMBER: 23679 SAS NUMBER:
SAMPLE TYPE: SOIL PROG ELEM: NSF COLLECTED
CITY: PLYMOUTH
COLLECTION START: 06/20/95
MD NUMBER: KA87
BY: D RUMFORD
ST: NC
0900 STOP: 00/00/00
•• ••
**
** **
*** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *** MG/KG
880
20UJ
6.2J
48J
0.46U
0.77UJ
2300J 23J
1.3UR
58J
28000
29
120UJ
ALUMINUM
ANTIMONY ARSENIC
BARIUM
BERYLLIUM
CADMIUM
CALCIUM CHROMIUM COBALT
COPPER
IRON
LEAD
MAGNESIUM
***FOOTNOTES***
ANALYTICAL RESULTS MG/KG
61J
0.21U
9UJ
130J
1.9U
2.1U no
4U
NA 6UJ
83J
76
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
MANGANESE
MERCURY
NICKEL
POTASSIUM
SELENIUM
SILVER
SODIUM
THALLIUM
TIN VANADIUM
ZINC PERCENT MOISTURE
*A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
*K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER.THAN VALUE GIVEN
*U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT. *R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
--------- - ----- --
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA. 08/04/95
METALS DATA REPORT ••• * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *·* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ***
**
**
**
**
**
PROJECT NO. 95-0293 SAMPLE
SOURCE, GA PACIFIC CORP HDWD
STATION ID, 003-SL,
CASE NUMBER, 23679
NO.
SAS
95447 SAMPLE TYPE, SOIL
NUMBER,
PROG ELEM, NSF COLLECTED
CITY, PLYMOUTH
COLLECTION START, 06/20/95
MD NUMBER, KA88
BY, D RUMFORD
ST, NC
0950 STOP, 00/00/00
**
**
**
**
**
*** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ***
MG/KG
4200
3 .4UJ
l.8J
41J
lU
0.25UJ
1800J
8.9J
2UJ 5UJ . 5900
15
450J
ALUMINUM
ANTIMONY
ARSENIC
BARIUM
BERYLLIUM CADMIUM
CALCIUM
CHROMIUM
COBALT
COPPER IRON
LEAD
MAGNESIUM
ANALYTICAL RESULTS MG/KG
92J
0. 06U
2.2J
270J
0.62U
O. 67U
32
1.3U
NA
14J
29J
21
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
MANGANESE
MERCURY
NICKEL POTASSIUM
SELENIUM
SILVER
SODIUM
THALLIUM
TIN VANADIUM
ZINC PERCENT MOISTURE
***FOOTNOTES*** *A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
*K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE.IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
*U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
*R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
-- - ------ - ---- ---
METALS DATA REPORT
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS·MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA. 08/04/95
*** * * * * *. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *** •• •• •• •• ••
PROJECT NO. 95-0293 SAMPLE NO. 95448
SOURCE: GA PACIFIC CORP HDWD STATION ID: 005-SL/'
CASE NUMBER: 23679 SAS NUMBER:
SAMPLE TYPE: SOIL PROG ELEM: NSF COLLECTED
CITY: PLYMOUTH
COLLECTION START: 06/20/95 MD NUMBER: KA89
BY: D RUMFORD
ST: NC
1020 STOP: 00/00/00
•• •• •• • • ••
*** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *** MG/KG
5000
lOUJ
48
190J
lU
2UJ
53000J
130J
5UJ
79J
120000
120
llOOJ
ALUMINUM
ANTIMONY
ARSENIC
BARIUM
BERYLLIUM
CADMIUM
CALCIUM
CHROMIUM
COBALT
COPPER IRON
LEAD
MAGNESIUM
***FOOTNOTES***
ANALYTICAL RESULTS MG/KG
380J
0.09U
58J
340J
0.90U
0.97U
130
l.9U
NA
20UJ
660J
45
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
MANGANESE
MERCURY
NICKEL
POTASSIUM
SELENIUM
SILVER
SODIUM
THALLIUM
TIN
VANADIUM
ZINC
PERCENT MOISTURE
*A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
*K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE.GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
*U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
*R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
----ilii iiilil --==-1!!!!1--------------.,__-=· =--=:::::_~•·=•~,
METALS DATA REPORT
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA. 08/04/95
••• •• •• •• •• ••
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *** PROJECT NO. 95-0293 SAMPLE NO.
SOURCE, GA PACIFIC CORP HDWD
STATION ID, 006-SL
CASE NUMBER, 23679 SAS
95449 SAMPLE TYPE, SOIL
NUMBER,
PROG ELEM, NSF COLLECTED
CITY, PLYMOUTH
COLLECTION START, 06/20/95
MD NUMBER, KA90
BY, D RUMFORD
ST, NC
1040 STOP, 00/00/00
•• •• •• • • ••
*** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *** MG/KG
3900
5.6UJ
11
92J 0.25U
lUJ
9300J
28J
3UJ
73J
33000
55
610J
ALUMINUM
ANTIMONY
ARSENIC
BARIUM
BERYLLIUM
CADMIUM
CALCIUM
CHROMIUM
COBALT
COPPER
IRON
LEAD
MAGNESIUM
ANALYTICAL RESULTS MG/KG
210J
0.58
lOJ
390J
lU
1.lU
86
2.lU
NA
20UJ
210J
53
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
MANGANESE
MERCURY
NICKEL
POTASSIUM
SELENIUM
SILVER
SODIUM
THALLIUM
TIN
VANADIUM
ZINC
PERCENT MOISTURE
\
***FOOTNOTES*** *A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
•K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS.KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
*U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT. *R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
-lliii --- --- - --- -- - - -
..
METALS DATA REPORT
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA. 08/04/95
*** **
**
**
**
**
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *** PROJECT NO. 95-0293 SAMPLE SOURCE: GA PACIFIC CORP HDWD
STATION ID: 001-SW /
CASE NUMBER: 23679
NO. 95450 SAMPLE TYPE:
SAS NUMBER:
SURFACEWA · PROG ELEM: NSF COLLECTED
CITY: PLYMOUTH
COLLECTION START: 06/20/95
MD NUMBER: KA91
BY: D RUMFORD
ST: NC
1015 STOP: 00/00/00
**
**
**
**
**
*** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *** UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/L
440J ALUMINUM 60J 2 OUJ ANTIMONY O . 1 OUJ
4UJ ARSENIC lOJ
28J BARIUM 2200J
lUJ BERYLLIUM 3UJ
lUJ CADMIUM 3UJ
7200J CALCIUM llOOOJ -5UJ--~~cHROMIUM-------------------------~5uJ
2UJ COBALT NA
6UJ COPPER 4 UJ
910J IRON 2UJ
3J LEAD
2800J MAGNESIUM
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
MANGANESE
MERCURY
NICKEL
POTASSIUM
SELENIUM
SILVER
SODIUM THALLIUM-------------
TIN
VANADIUM
ZINC
***REMARKS*** ***REMARKS***
SAMPLE RECEIVED WITH A PH GREATER THAN 2
***FOOTNOTES***
*A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
*K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
*U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
*R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
---liiiil liiiiil liiii lilliil iliii iiiii liiiiii &iii liiil 111111a
METALS DATA REPORT
*** * * * * * * * * * * * * *. * •• •• •• •• ••
PROJECT NO. 95-0293 SAMPLE SOURCE, GA PACIFIC CORP HDWD
STATION ID, 001-SD/"
CASE NUMBER, 23679
• • NO.
SAS
• • • • 95451
NUMBER,
•
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA.
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
SAMPLE TYPE, SOIL PROG ELEM, NSF
CITY, PLYMOUTH
•
COLLECTION START,
MD NUMBER, KA92
• • • • • • • • • • • COLLECTED BY, D RUMFORD
ST, NC
06/20/95 1020 STOP,
• • • • •
00/00/00
• •
08/04/95
• • • •• •• •• •• •• • •
*** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *** MG/KG ANALYTICAL RESULTS MG/KG ANALYTICAL RESULTS
17000 ALUMINUM 720J MANGANESE
6.lUJ ANTIMONY O.lOU MERCURY
4U ARSENIC 14J NICKEL
lBOJ BARIUM 1900J POTASSIUM
2U BERYLLIUM l.lU SELENIUM
lUJ CADMIUM l.2U SILVER 1700J CALCIUM ________ _ ·-30J-----cHROMIUM·---
-----1-30-----SODIUM __ _
2.3U THALLIUM
20UJ COBALT NA TIN
22J COPPER 5 BJ VANADIUM
31000 IRON 120J ZINC
30 LEAD 57 PERCENT MOISTURE
3200J MAGNESIUM
***FOOTNOTES*** *A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
*K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN *U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT. *R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
- --- - ---- - --- -- --
METALS DATA REPORT
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS,' GA. 08/04/95
***. * * * * *· * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *. * * * * *** •• •• ••
** ••
PROJECT NO. 95-0293 SAMPLE NO. 95452 SOURCE, GA PACIFIC CORP HDWD STATION ID, 101-SW CASE NUMBER, 23679 SAS NUMBER,
SAMPLE TYPE, SURFACEWA PROG ELEM, NSF COLLECTED CITY, PLYMOUTH
COLLECTION START, 06/20/95 · MD NUMBER, KA93
BY, D RUMFORD
ST, NC
1015 STOP, 00/00/00
•• •• •• •• ••
*** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *** UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/L ANALYTICAL RESULTS 550J ALUMINUM 62J MANGANESE 20UJ ANTIMONY 0.10UJ MERCURY
4UJ ARSENIC 5UJ NICKEL
29J BARIUM 2200J POTASSIUM
1UJ BERYLLIUM 3UJ SELENIUM 1UJ CADMIUM 3UJ SILVER
7300J . CALCIUM -SUJ----CHROMIUM·-------------------~--
_________ 110_0_0J __ SODIUM __
6UJ THALLIUM
2UJ COBALT NA TIN
6UJ COPPER SUJ VANADIUM 990J IRON 2UJ ZINC 3J LEAD
2800J MAGNESIUM
***REMARKS*** ***REMARKS*** SAMPLE RECEIVED WITH A PH GREATER THAN 2
***FOOTNOTES*** *A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL *K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN. *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
*U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
*R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
----- -------------
METALS DATA REPORT
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA. 08/04/95
*** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *** **
**
**
**
**
PROJECT NO. 95-0293 SAMPLE NO. 95453
SOURCE, GA PACIFIC CORP HDWD STATION ID, 101-SD
CASE NUMBER, 23679 SAS NUMBER,
SAMPLE TYPE, SOIL PROG ELEM, NSF COLLECTED
CITY, PLYMOUTH
COLLECTION START, 06/20/95
MD NUMBER, KA94
BY, D RUMFORD
ST, NC
1020 STOP, 00/00/00
**
**
**
**
** *** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *** MG/KG
20000 ALUMINUM
5.7UJ ANTIMONY 4J ARSENIC
190J BARIUM
2U BERYLLIUM
lUJ CADMIUM
1700J CALCIUM -25J~---CHROMIUM----
20UJ COBALT
23J COPPER
32000 IRON
30 LEAD
3200J MAGNESIUM
***FOOTNOTES***
ANALYTICAL RESULTS MG/KG
710J
0.2U
14J
1900J
lU
MANGANESE
MERCURY
NICKEL
POTASSIUM
SELENIUM
SILVER l. lU 130_:_
2.2U
NA
59J
120J
~SODIUM---THALLIUM
TIN
VANADIUM
ZINC
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
56 PERCENT MOISTURE
*A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL *K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN *U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
*R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
illi --- - -- - - -- - -- - -
METALS DATA REPORT
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA.
*** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *** •• •• •• •• ••
PROJECT NO. 95-0293 SAMPLE NO. 95454
SOURCE: GA PACIFIC CORP HDWD
STATION ID: 004-SL;
SAMPLE TYPE: SOIL PROG ELEM: NSF COLLECTED
CITY: PLYMOUTH
08/04/95
CASE NUMBER: 23679 SAS NUMBER: COLLECTION START: 06/20/95
MD NUMBER: KA95
BY: D RUMFORD
ST: NC
1125 STOP: 00/00/00
MG/KG
3200 ALUMINUM
ANTIMONY
ANALYTICAL RESULTS *** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ***
•• •• •• •• ••
MG/KG
8.1J
6,9
60J
lU
lUJ
lOOOOOJ
-977J~
2UJ 63J
7800
89
1900J
ARSENIC
BARIUM
BERYLLIUM
CADMIUM
CALCIUM --CHROMIUM _____ -~ ---
COBALT
COPPER
IRON
LEAD
MAGNESIUM
***FOOTNOTES***
140J MANGANESE
0.06U MERCURY
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
34J NICKEL
500J POTASSIUM
0.60U SELENIUM
0. 64U SILVER
140-----SODIUM--~---
1. 2U THALLIUM
NA TIN
8UJ VANADIUM
510J ZINC
2 3 PERCENT MOISTURE
*A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
*KoACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
*U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
*R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
--

-

-
--

-
--

-
---

-

-
-

-
METALS DATA REPORT
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA. 08/04/95
*** **
**
**
**
**
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *** PROJECT NO. 95-0293 SAMPLE NO. SOURCE, GA PACIFIC CORP HDWD
STATION ID, 002-SL/
CASE NUMBER, 23679 SAS
95455 SAMPLE TYPE, SOIL
NUMBER,
PROG ELEM, NSF COLLECTED CITY, PLYMOUTH
COLLECTION START, 06/20/95
MD NUMBER, KA96
BY, D RUMFORD
ST, NC
1155 STOP, 00/00/00
**
**
**
** ** *** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *** MG/KG
4300 ALUMINUM
ANALYTICAL RESULTS MG/KG 790J MANGANESE ANALYTICAL RESULTS
4.8UJ ANTIMONY
5.4 ARSENIC 0.09U MERCURY
5.lJ NICKEL 140J BARIUM 370J POTASSIUM lU BERYLLIUM 0.88U SELENIUM lUJ CADMIUM 0.95U SILVER 17000J CALCIUM
llJ CHROMIUM---------· ---------3UJ ___ -COBALT
77 __ SODIUM---------------1.~ THALLIUM
NA TIN 13J COPPER 20UJ VANADIUM 9200 IRON lOOJ ZINC 250 LEAD 48 PERCENT MOISTURE 660J MAGNESIUM
***FOOTNOTES***
*A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL *K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN .VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN *U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
*R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
--liiiiil ---- --
METALS DATA REPORT
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA. 08/04/95
*** *. * * * * •• *. * *. * * *. * •• * *. * * * * * * * * * * *. * * * * *. * *. * * * * * * * * * * * *. *. * * * *** •• •• •• •• ••
PROJECT NO. 95-0293 SAMPLE NO. 95456
SOURCE, GA PACIFIC CORP HDWD STATION ID, 009-SW,
CASE NUMBER, 23679 SAS NUMBER,
SAMPLE TYPE, SURFACEWA PROG ELEM, NSF .COLLECTED
CITY, PLYMOUTH
COLLECTION START, 06/19/95
MD NUMBER, KA79
BY, D RUMFORD ST, NC
1350 STOP, 00/00/00
•• •• •• •• •• *** * * *. *. * * * *. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * •• * * * * * * * * * * * * •• *. * * * * * * * * *. * * * * * *** UG/L
1300J
20UJ 4UJ
44J
1UJ
1UJ
8100J
5UJ -2uJ· --
6UJ
3000J
10J
2900J
ALUMINUM ANTIMONY
ARSENIC
BARIUM
BERYLLIUM
CADMIUM
CALCIUM CHROMIUM __ ·coB-ALT
COPPER
IRON LEAD
MAGNESIUM
***REMARKS***
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
------~-------
SAMPLE RECEIVED WITH A PH GREATER THAN 2
***FOOTNOTES***
UG/L 160J
0.2UJ
5UJ
2400J
4UJ
3UJ
11000J ~--6UJ-
NA 6UJ
2UJ
MANGANESE
MERCURY
NICKEL
POTASSIUM
SELENIUM
SILVER
_SODIUM-
THALLIUM
TIN
VANADIUM
ZINC
***REMARKS***
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
*A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL *K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN *U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
*R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
--liiiil liliiiil -- -- -
111111 ---
METALS DATA REPORT
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA. 08/04/95
*** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *** •• •• •• •• ••
PROJECT NO. 95-0293 SAMPLE NO. 95457
SOURCE, GA PACIFIC CORP HDWD
STATION ID, 009-SD -
CASE NUMBER, 23679 SAS NUMBER,
SAMPLE TYPE, SOIL PROG ELEM, NSF COLLECTED
CITY, PLYMOUTH
COLLECTION START, 06/19/95
MD NUMBER, KA80
BY, D RUMFORD ST, NC
1425 STOP, 00/00/00
•• •• •• • • •• *** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *** MG/KG
12000 ALUMINUM
6.SUJ ANTIMONY
22 ARSENIC
190J BARIUM
2U BERYLLIUM 3UJ CADMIUM
2700J CALCIUM
48J CHROMIUM
20UJ COBALT
100J COPPER
150000 IRON
330 LEAD
2000J MAGNESIUM
***FOOTNOTES***
ANALYTICAL RESULTS MG/KG 970J
0.3U
33J
1200J
1.2UJ
1.3U
120
2.5U
NA
48J
530J
58
MANGANESE
MERCURY
NICKEL POTASSIUM
SELENIUM
SILVER
SODIUM
THALLIUM
TIN
VANADIUM
ZINC
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
PERCENT MOISTURE
*A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL *K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN *U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
*R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
--- -- -- --- -----
METALS DATA REPORT
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA. 08/04/95
••• • • * • • • • • • • • • • • • • * • • • • • * • • • * • • * * • • * "* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *** •• •• •• •• ••
PROJECT NO. 95-0293 SAMPLE SOURCE: GA PACIFIC CORP HDWD
STATION ID: 010-SW ✓
CASE NUMBER: 23679
NO.
SAS
95458 SAMPLE TYPE: SURFACEWA
NUMBER:
PROG ELEM: NSF COLLECTED CITY: PLYMOUTH
COLLECTION START: 06/19/95
MD NUMBER: KA81
BY: D RUMFORD
ST: NC
1615 STOP: 00/00/00
•• •• •• • • •• *** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *** UG/L 480J
20UJ
4UJ
29J
lUJ
lUJ
7300J
5UJ
2UJ
5UJ
980J 3UJ
2800J
ALUMINUM
ANTIMONY
ARSENIC
BARIUM
BERYLLIUM
CADMIUM
CALCIUM
CHROMIUM
COBALT
COPPER
IRON
LEAD
MAGNESIUM
***REMARKS***
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
SAMPLE RECEIVED .WITH A PH GREATER THAN 2
***FOOTNOTES***
UG/L
63J O.lOUJ
5UJ 2300J
3UJ
3UJ
llOOOJ 6UJ
NA 5UJ
2UJ
MANGANESE
MERCURY
NICKEL
POTASSIUM
SELENIUM
SILVER
SODIUM
THALLIUM
TIN
VANADIUM
ZINC
***REMARKS***
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
•A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
•U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
•R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
-- --------- ---- --
METALS DATA REPORT
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA. 08/04/95
*** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *** **
**
**
**
**
PROJECT NO. 95-0293 SAMPLE NO. 95459 SOURCE, GA PACIFIC CORP HDWD
STATION ID, 010-SD,
CASE NUMBER, 23679 SAS NUMBER,
SAMPLE TYPE, SOIL PROG ELEM, NSF COLLECTED
CITY, PLYMOUTH
COLLECTION START, 06/19/95
MD NUMBER , KA8 2 .
BY, D RUMFORD
ST, NC
1620 STOP, 00/00/00
**
** **
**
** *** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *** MG/KG
9900
4.5UJ
3U
lOOJ
2U
0. 33UJ
1800J
21J
9UJ
15J 18000
16
1900J
ALUMINUM-ANTIMONY ARSENIC
BARIUM
BERYLLIUM
CADMIUM
CALCIUM CHROMIUM
COBALT
COPPER
IRON
LEAD
MAGNESIUM
***FOOTNOTES***
ANALYTICAL RESULTS MG/KG 450J
0.09U 7.6J
1200J
0.83U
0.89U
80
l.7U NA
33J
64J
42
MANGANESE
MERCURY
NICKEL
POTASSIUM
SELENIUM SILVER
SODIUM
THALLIUM
TIN
VANADIUM
ZINC
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
PERCENT MOISTURE
*A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
*K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO·BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL·VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
*U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
*R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
&ii iiiil -- --- --li!!l!I -
METALS DATA REPORT
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT ·SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA. 08/04/95
***
**
**
**
**
**
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *** PROJECT NO. 95-0293 SAMPLE NO. SOURCE, GA PACIFIC CORP HDWD
STATION ID, 109-SW
CASE NUMBER, 23679 SAS
95460 SAMPLE TYPE, SURFACWA
NUMBER,
PROG ELEM, NSF COLLECTED
CITY, PLYMOUTH
COLLECTION START, 06/19/95 MD NUMBER, KA83
BY, D RUMFORD ST, NC
1350 STOP, 00/00/00
** •• •• •• •• *** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *** UG/L 660J 20UJ
4UJ
31J
1UJ
1UJ
7400J
SUJ
2UJ
BUJ
1500J
SJ
2700J
ALUMINUM
ANTIMONY
ARSENIC
BARIUM
BERYLLIUM
CADMIUM
CALCIUM
CHROMIUM
COBALT
COPPER
IRON
LEAD
MAGNESIUM
***REMARKS***
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
SAMPLE RECEIVED WITH A PH GREATER THAN 2
***FOOTNOTES***
UG/L
87J
0.10UJ
SUJ
2200J
3UJ
3UJ
10000J
6UJ
NA
6UJ
2UJ
MANGANESE
MERCURY
NICKEL
POTASSIUM
SELENIUM
SILVER
SODIUM THALLIUM
TIN
VANADIUM
ZINC
***REMARKS***
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
*A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
*K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN *U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
*R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION .
&iii ilii ----- ----..
METALS DATA REPORT
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA. 08/04/95
*** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *** ++
++
++
++
++
PROJECT NO. 95-0293 SAMPLE NO. 95461
SOURCE, GA PACIFIC CORP HDWD
STATION ID, 109-SD
CASE NUMBER, 23679 SAS NUMBER,
SAMPLE TYPE, SOIL PROG ELEM, NSF COLLECTED
CITY, PLYMOUTH COLLECTION START, 06/19/95
MD NUMBER, KA84
BY, D RUMFORD
ST, NC
1425 STOP, 00/00/00
++
++
++
++
++
*** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *** MG/KG
11000
6.2UJ
19
160J
2U
2.BJ
2700J
23J
20UJ
130J
70000
250
2000J
ALUMINUM
ANTIMONY
ARSENIC BARIUM
BERYLLIUM
CADMIUM
CALCIUM
CHROMIUM COBALT
COPPER
IRON
LEAD
MAGNESIUM
***FOOTNOTES***
ANALYTICAL RESULTS MG/KG
650J 0.2U
35J
1200J
l.lUJ
l.2U
130
2 .4U
NA
52J
930J
57
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
MANGANESE
MERCURY
NICKEL
POTASSIUM
SELENIUM SILVER
SODIUM
THALLIUM
TIN
VANADIUM
ZINC
PERCENT MOISTURE
*A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL *K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
*U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
*R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
fiiii -- ----- -- - --- --,,. '· -
METALS DATA REPORT
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA. 08/04/95
*** * * * * * * * * *. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *** **
** ** **
**
PROJECT NO. 95-0293 SAMPLE NO. 95462
SOURCE: GA PACIFIC CORP HDWD
STATION ID: 013-RN
CASE NUMBER: 23679 SAS NUMBER:
SAMPLE TYPE: SURFACWA PROG ELEM: NSF COLLECTED
CITY: PLYMOUTH
COLLECTION START: 06/19/95
MD NUMBER: KA97
BY: D RUMFORD
ST: NC
0700 STOP: 00/00/00
**
**
**
**
** *** * * * * * * * * t * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *** UG/L 20UJ
20UJ
3.3U 3UJ
1UJ
2UJ
400UJ
5UJ 2UJ
7UJ
30UJ
3UJ 40UJ
ALUMINUM
ANTIMONY
ARSENIC
BARIUM
BERYLLIUM
CADMIUM
CALCIUM CHROMIUM
COBALT
COPPER
IRON
LEAD
MAGNESIUM
***REMARKS•••
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
SAMPLE RECEIVED WITH A PH GREATER THAN 2
***FOOTNOTES***
UG/L 6UJ
0.10UJ
5UJ
90UJ
2.5U
3UJ 210J
5.2U
NA
3UJ
130
MANGANESE
MERCURY
NICKEL
POTASSIUM
SELENIUM
SILVER
SODIUM
THALLIUM
TIN VANADIUM
ZINC
***REMARKS***
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
*A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL *K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN *U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
*R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
lliil iliii iiii iiiil ---- - - ----- --
I
I
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Region IV
Environmental Services Division
College Station Road, Athens, Ga. 30613
l****MEMORANDUM******
I DATE: 08/16/95
SUBJECT:
I
I FROM:
I
Results of Purgeable Organic Analysis;
95-0293 GA PACIFIC CORP HDWD
PLYMOUTH NC
CASE NO: 23679
arlesL~
hief, Laboratory Evaluation/Quality Assurance Section
TO: PAT DEROSA
'ttached are the results of analysis of samples collected as part of ife subject project.
Isla result of the Quality Assurance Review, certain data qualifiers
may have been placed on the data. Attached is a DATA QUALIFIER
'PORT which explains the reasons that these qualifiers were required.
1. If you have any questions please contact me.
I ATTACHMENT
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
ORGANIC DATA QUALIFIER REPORT
Case Number 23679 Project Number 95-0293 SAS Number
Site ID. Georgia Pacific Corp HDWD, Plymouth, NC
Affected Samples
Volatiles·
all samples
95446
95447,95453,
95455
Extractables
95445,95446
95447,95450,
95452,95454,
95456,95458,
95460,95462
95448
95451
95453,95455,
95459
95455
95457
95461
Compound or Fraction
chloromethane
benzene
toluene
chlorobenzene
2-butanone
all compounds
pyrene
benzo(g,h,i)perylene
pyrene
di-n-octylphthalate
benzo(b/k)fluoranthene
benzo(a)pyrene
indeno(l,2,3-cd)pyrene
dibenz(a,h)anthracene
benzo(g,h,i)perylene
pyrene
benzo(b/k)fluoranthene
benzo(g,h,i)perylene
fluoranthene
pyrene
benzo(b/k)fluoranthene
benzo(g,h,i)perylene
benzo(a)pyrene
chrysene
phenanthrene
fluoranthene
pyrene
chrysene
benzo(a)pyrene
indeno(l,2,3-cd)pyrene
benzo(g,h,i)perylene
fluoranthene
pyrene
chrysene
benzo(b/k)fluoranthene
benzo(a)pyrene
benzo(g,h,i)perylene
R
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
Flag
Used Reason
unacceptable PE sample recovery
< quantitation limit
< quantitation limit
< quantitation limit
< quantitation limit
exceeded extraction holding time
low PE sample recovery
low PE sample recovery
low PE sample recovery
low internal standard recovery
low internal standard recovery
low internal standard recovery
low internal standard recovery
low internal standard recovery
low internal standard recovery
< quantitation limit
< quantitation limit
low PE sample recovery
< quantitation limit
< quantitation limit
< quantitation limit
low PE sample recovery
< quantitation limit
< quantitation limit
< quantitation limit
< qunatitation limit
< quantitation limit
< quantitation limit
< quantitation limit
< quantitation limit
< quantitation limit
< quantitation limit
< quantitation limit
< quantitation limit
< quantitation limit
< quantitation limit
low PE sample recovery
I·
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
ORGANIC DATA QUALIFIER REPORT
Case Number 23679
Affected Samples Compound or Fraction
Pesticides
all samples
95445,95446
95447
95454
95455
95457
95459
aroclor-1016
alpha-bhc
delta-bhc
garnma-bhc
4,4' -DDE
4,4' -DDT
beta-bhc
4,4'-DDE
delta-bhc
garnma-bhc
· endrin aldehyde
4,4' -DDE
Project Number 95-0293
Flag
Used
R
C
C
C
J
J
J
J
J
N
J
J
J
N
Reason
unacceptable PE sample recovery
GC/MS confirmed
GC/MS confirmed
GC/MS confirmed
< quantitation limit
< quantitation limit
< quantitation limit
< quantitation limit
< quantitation limit
difference in column
quantitations
< quantitation limit
< quantitation limit
< quantitation limit
difference in column
quantitations
PURGEABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA. 08/15/95
*** *. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *** ** **
** **
**
PROJECT NO. 95-0293 SAMPLE NO. 95445
SOURCE: GA PACIFIC CORP HDWD STATION ID: 007-SL/
CASE NO.: 23679
SAMPLE TYPE: SOIL
SAS NO.:
PROG ELEM: NSF COLLECTED
CITY: PLYMOUTH
COLLECTION START: 06/20/95
D. NO.: KA86
BY: D RUMFORD
ST: NC
0900 STOP: 00/00/00
**
**
** **
** *** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *** UG/KG
24UR
240
240
240
1400 sou
240 240
240
240
240
240 240
240
240
240
CHLOROMETHANE BROMOMETHANE
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
VINYL CHLORIDE
CHLO RO ETHANE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
ACETONE
CARBON DISULFIDE
1,1-DICHLOROETHENE(l,l-DICHLOROETHYLENE)
.1,1-DICHLOROETHANE
1,2-DICHLOROETHENE (TOTAL)
CHLOROFORM
1,2-DICHLOROETHANE
METHYL ETHYL KETONE
1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
***REMARKS***
***FOOTNOTES***
UG/KG
240
240 240
240
240
240 240
240
240
240
240
240
240 240
240
240
240
59
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE
CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
TRICHLOROETHENE(TRICHLOROETHYLENE)
DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE
1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE
BENZENE
TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
BROMOFORM
METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE
METHYL BUTYL KETONE
TETRACHLOROETHENE(TETRACHLOROETHYLENE).
1,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
TOLUENE
CHLOROBENZENE
ETHYL BENZENE
STYRENE TOTAL XYLENES
PERCENT MOISTURE
***REMARKS***
*A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
*K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
*U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
*R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
--liill ---- -- ---
PURGEABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA. 08/15/95
*** * * * *. * * •· * ~ * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *** **
**
**
**
**
PROJECT NO. 95-0293 SAMPLE NO. 95446
SOURCE, GA PACIFIC CORP HDWD SAMPLE TYPE, SOIL
STATION ID, 107-SL
CASE NO., 23679 SAS NO.,
PROG ELEM, NSF COLLECTED
CITY, PLYMOUTH
COLLECTION START, 06/20/95
BY, D RUMFORD
ST, NC
0900 STOP, 00/00/00
*** * * * * * *. * * * * * * * *. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ***
D. NO., KA87
**
**
**
**
**
UG/KG
27UR
27U
27U
27U
70U
27U
27U
27U
27U
27U
27U
27U
27U
27U
27U
27U
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
CHLOROMETHANE BROMOMETHANE
VINYL CHLORIDE
CHLO RO ETHANE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
ACETONE
CARBON DISULFIDE
1,1-DICHLOROETHENE(l,l-DICHLOROETHYLENE)
1,1-DICHLOROETHANE
1,2-DICHLOROETHENE (TOTAL)
CHLOROFORM
1,2-DICHLOROETHANE
METHYL ETHYL KETONE
1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
***REMARKS***
***FOOTNOTES***
UG/KG
27U
27U
27U 27U
27U
4J
27U
27U
27U
27U
27U
27U
SJ
4J
27U 27U
27U
63
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE
CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
TRICHLOROETHENE(TRICHLOROETHYLENE)
DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE
1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE BENZENE
TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE BROMOFORM
METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE
METHYL BUTYL KETONE
TETRACHLOROETHENE(TETRACHLOROETHYLENE)
1,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE TOLUENE
CHLOROBENZENE
ETHYL BENZENE
STYRENE
TOTAL XYLENES
PERCENT MOISTURE
***REMARKS***
*A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
*K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
*U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT. 4 R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
--- ---- --- ---- - - - -
PURGEABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA. 08/15/95·
*** * * * * * *. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *** •• •• •• •• ••
PROJECT NO. 95-0293 SAMPLE NO.
SOURCE: GA PACIFIC CORP HDWD
STATION ID: 003-SL -
95447 SAMPLE TYPE: SOIL
CASE NO.: 23679 SAS NO.:
PROG ELEM: NSF COLLECTED CITY: PLYMOUTH
COLLECTION START: 06/20/95
BY: D RUMFORD ST: NC
0950 STOP: 00/00/00
*** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *** UG/KG
13UR
13U
13U
13U
20U
40U
13U
13U
13U
13U
13U
13U
D. NO.: KASS
•• •• • • •• ••
6J
13U
13U
13U
CHLOROMETHANE
BROMOMETHANE
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
VINYL CHLORIDE
CHLO RO ETHANE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
ACETONE
CARBON DISULFIDE
1,1-DICHLOROETHENE(l,l-DICHLOROETHYLENE)
1,1-DICHLOROETHANE
1,2-DICHLOROETHENE (TOTAL)
CHLOROFORM
1,2-DICHLOROETHANE
METHYL ETHYL KETONE
1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
***REMARKS***
***FOOTNOTES***
UG/KG
13U
13U
13U
13U
13U
13U
13U
_13U
13U
13U
13U
13U
13U
13U
13U 13U
13U
21
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE
CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
TRICHLOROETHENE(TRICHLOROETHYLENE) DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE
1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE
BENZENE '
TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE BROMOFORM
METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE
METHYL BUTYL KETONE
TETRACHLOROETHENE(TETRACHLOROETHYLENE)
1,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
TOLUENE
CHLOROBENZENE
ETHYL BENZENE
STYRENE
TOTAL XYLENES
PERCENT MOISTURE
***REMARKS***
*A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL *K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN ,U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
•R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
-- ---- ------ -- -
PURGEABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA. 08/15/95
*** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *** ** **
**
**
**
PROJECT NO. 95-0293 SAMPLE NO. 95448
SOURCE, GA PACIFIC CORP HDWD
STATION ID, 005-SL
CASE NO., 23679
SAMPLE TYPE, SOIL
SAS NO.,
PROG ELEM, NSF COLLECTED
CITY, PLYMOUTH
COLLECTION START, 06/20/95
D. NO., KA89
BY, D RUMFORD
ST, NC
1020 STOP, 00/00/00
**
**
**
**
** *** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *** UG/KG
17UR
17U
17U
17U
30U
17U
17U
17U
17U
17U
17U
17U
17U
17U
17U
17U
CHLO ROM ETHANE
BROMOMETHANE
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
VINYL CHLORIDE
CHLO RO ETHANE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
ACETONE
CARBON DISULFIDE
1,1-DICHLOROETHENE(l,l-DICHLOROETHYLENE) 1,1-DICHLOROETHANE
1,2-DICHLOROETHENE (TOTAL)
CHLOROFORM
1,2-DICHLOROETHANE
METHYL ETHYL KETONE
1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
***REMARKS***
***FOOTNOTES***
UG/KG
17U
17U
17U
17U
17U
17U
17U
17U
17U
17U
17U
17U
17U
17U
17U
17U
17U
40
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE
CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
TRICHLOROETHENE(TRICHLOROETHYLENE)
DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE
1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE
BENZENE
TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
BROMOFORM
METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE
METHYL BUTYL KETONE
TETRACHLOROETHENE(TETRACHLOROETHYLENE)
1,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
TOLUENE CHLOROBENZENE
ETHYL BENZENE
STYRENE
TOTAL XYLENES
PERCENT MOISTURE
***REMARKS***
*A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
*K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
*U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
•R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION. -;-- ----------- - -
.. -
PURGEABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA. 08/15/95
*** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *** **
**
**
**
**
PROJECT NO. 95-0293 SAMPLE NO. 95449
SOURCE: GA PACIFIC CORP HDWD SAMPLE TYPE: SOIL
STATION ID: 006-SL -
CASE NO.: 23679 SAS NO.:
PROG ELEM: NSF COLLECTED CITY: PLYMOUTH COLLECTION START: 06/20/95
BY: D RUMFORD
ST: NC
1040 STOP: 00/00/00
*** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *** UG/KG ANALYTICAL RESULTS
D. NO.: KA90
**
**
**
** **
NA CHLOROMETHANE NA BROMOMETHANE
NA VINYL CHLORIDE
NA CHLOROETHANE
NA METHYLENE CHLORIDE NA ACETONE NA CARBON DISULFIDE
NA 1,1-DICHLOROETHENE(l,l-DICHLOROETHYLENE)
NA 1,1-DICHLOROETHANE
NA 1,2-DICHLOROETHENE (TOTAL) NA CHLOROFORM
NA 1,2-DICHLOROETHANE
NA METHYL ETHYL KETONE
NA 1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE
NA CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
NA BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
***REMARKS***
NO SAMPLE CONTAINER RECEIVED
***FOOTNOTES***
UG/KG ANALYTICAL RESULTS
NA 1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE
NA. CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
NA TRICHLOROETHENE(TRICHLOROETHYLENE)
NA DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE
NA 1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE
NA BENZENE
NA TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
NA BROMOFORM
NA METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE
NA METHYL BUTYL KETONE NA TETRACHLOROETHENE(TETRACHLOROETHYLENE)
NA 1,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE NA TOLUENE
NA CHLOROBENZENE
NA ETHYL BENZENE
NA STYRENE NA TOTAL XYLENES
PERCENT MOISTURE
***REMARKS***
*A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
*K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
*U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
<R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION. -.. -- --.. -· --- -
---_,_ -
PURGEABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA. 08/15/95
*** *. * * * •• * *. * * •• * *. *. *. * *. * * * * *. * * * •• * * * * * * *. * * * * * * •• * * * * * * * *. * * *** ••
**
**
**
PROJECT NO. 95-0293 SAMPLE NO. 95450
SOURCE, GA PACIFIC CORP HDWD SAMPLE TYPE, SURFACEWA
STATION ID, 001-SW
••· CASE NO.: 23679 SAS NO.,
PROG ELEM, NSF COLLECTED CITY, PLYMOUTH
COLLECTION START, 06/20/95
BY, D RUMFORD ST, NC
1015 STOP, 00/00/00
*** * * * * *. *. * •• * *. * *. * * * •• * *. * * * * * * * * * * *. *. * * * * * * *. * * * *. * * * * * * *. * * ***
D. NO., KA91
** ••
** ••
**
UG/L
10UR
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U 10U
10U
10U
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
CHLOROMETHANE
BROMOMETHANE
VINYL CHLORIDE
CHLOROETHANE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
ACETONE
CARBON DISULFIDE
1,1-DICHLOROETHENE(1,1-DICHLOROETHYLENE)
1,1-DICHLOROETHANE
1,2-DICHLOROETHENE (TOTAL)
CHLOROFORM
1,2-DICHLOROETHANE
METHYL ETHYL KETONE
1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
***FOOTNOTES***
UG/L
10U
10U
10U
10U 10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U 10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE
CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
TRICHLOROETHENE(TRICHLOROETHYLENE)
DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE
1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE
BENZENE
TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE BROMOFORM
METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE
METHYL BUTYL KETONE
TETRACHLOROETHENE(TETRACHLOROETHYLENE) 1,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE TOLUENE
CHLOROBENZENE
ETHYL BENZENE STYRENE
TOTAL XYLENES
*A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
*K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
*U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
•R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
--- --·----·---·-- - -
PURGEABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA. 08/15/95
*** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *** **
**
**
**
**
PROJECT NO. 95-0293 SAMPLE NO. 95451
SOURCE, GA PACIFIC CORP HDWD SAMPLE TYPE, SOIL
STATION ID, 001-SD·-
CASE NO., 23679 SAS NO.,
PROG ELEM, NSF COLLECTED
CITY, PLYMOUTH
COLLECTION START, 06/20/95
BY, D RUMFORD
ST, NC
1020 STOP, 00/00/00
*** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ***
D. NO., KA92
**
**
**
**
**
UG/KG
25UR
25U
25U
25U sou 100U
25U
25U
25U
25U
25U
25U
25U
25U
25U
25U
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
CHLOROMETHANE
BROMOMETHANE
VINYL CHLORIDE
CHLO RO ETHANE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
ACETONE
CARBON DISULFIDE
1,1-DICHLOROETHENE(1,1-DICHLOROETHYLENE)
1,1-DICHLOROETHANE
1,2-DICHLOROETHENE (TOTAL)
CHLOROFORM
1,2-DICHLOROETHANE
METHYL ETHYL KETONE
1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
***FOOTNOTES***
UG/KG
25U
25U
25U
25U
25U
25U
25U
25U
25U
25U
25U
25U
25U 25U
25U
25U
25U
60
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE
CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
TRICHLOROETHENE(TRICHLOROETHYLENE)
DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE 1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE
BENZENE
TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE BROMOFORM
METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE
METHYL BUTYL KETONE
TETRACHLOROETHENE(TETRACHLOROETHYLENE)
1,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
TOLUENE
CHLOROBENZENE
ETHYL BENZENE
STYRENE
TOTAL XYLENES
PERCENT MOISTURE
*A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
*K-ACTUAL VALUE· IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
*U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
•R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
·--- --- -- --- ---- -- --
PURGEABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA. 08/15/95
*** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *** •• •• •• •• ••
PROJECT NO. 95-0293 SAMPLE NO. 95452
SOURCE, GA PACIFIC CORP HDWD SAMPLE TYPE, SURFACEWA
STATION ID, 101-SW,
CASE NO., 23679 SAS NO.,
PROG ELEM, NSF COLLECTED
CITY, PLYMOUTH
COLLECTION START, 06/20/95
BY, D RUMFORD
ST, NC
1015 STOP, 00/00/00
*** * * * * * * *. * * * * * * * * *. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ***
D. NO., KA93
•• •• • • •• ••
UG/L
10UR
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U 10U
10U
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
CHLOROMETHANE
BROMOMETHANE
VINYL CHLORIDE
CHLOROETHANE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
ACETONE
CARBON DISULFIDE
1,1-DICHLOROETHENE(1,1-DICHLOROETHYLENE) 1,1-DICHLOROETHANE .
1,2cDICHLOROETHENE (TOTAL)
CHLOROFORM
1,2-DICHLOROETHANE
METHYL ETHYL KETONE
1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
***FOOTNOTES***
UG/L
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U 10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE
CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
TRICHLOROETHENE(TRICHLOROETHYLENE) DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE .
1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE
BENZENE
TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE BROMOFORM
METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE
METHYL BUTYL KETONE
TETRACHLOROETHENE(TETRACHLOROETHYLENE) 1,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE TOLUENE
CHLOROBENZENE
ETHYL BENZENE
STYRENE
TOTAL XYLENES
*A-AVERAGE VALUE. *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL *K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN *U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
*R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
- --- -- ---·-- ----- ---
PURGEABLE.ORGANICS DATA REPORT
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA. 08/15/95
*** * * * * * * * * * * *. * *. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *** **
**
**
**
**
PROJECT NO, 95-0293 SAMPLE NO. 95453 SOURCE, GA PACIFIC CORP HDWD STATION ID: 101-SD
CASE NO., 23679
SAMPLE TYPE: SOIL
SAS NO.:
PROG ELEM: NSF COLLECTED CITY, PLYMOUTH
COLLECTION START: 06/20/95
D. NO., KA94
BY, D RUMFORD
ST: NC
1020 STOP, 00/00/00
**
**
**
**
** *** *. * *. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *** UG/KG
22UR
22U
22U
22U
JOU
JOU
22U
22U
22U
22U
22U
22U
16J
22U
22U
22U
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
CHLOROMETHANE BROMOMETHANE
VINYL CHLORIDE
CHLO RO ETHANE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
ACETONE CARBON DISULFIDE
1,1-DICHLOROETHENE(1,1-DICHLOROETHYLENE)
1,1-DICHLOROETl!ANE
1,2-DICHLOROETHENE (TOTAL) CHLOROFORM
1,2-DICHLOROETHANE
METHYL ETHYL KETONE 1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE BROMODICHLOROMETl!ANE
***FOOTNOTES***
UG/KG
22U
22U 22U
22U
22U
22U
22U
22U
22U
22U
22U
22U
22U
22U
22U
22U
22U
54
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE
CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
TRICHLOROETHENE(TRICHLOROETHYLENE)
DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE
1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE
BENZENE
TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
BROMOFORM
METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE METHYL BUTYL KETONE TETRACHLOROETHENE(TETRACHLOROETHYLENE)
1,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETl!ANE
TOLUENE
CHLOROBENZENE
ETHYL BENZENE
STYRENE
TOTAL XYLENES
PERCENT MOISTURE
*A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT.ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL *K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT. •R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION. .. ------------------
PURGEABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA. 08/15/95
*** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *** •• •• •• •• ••
PROJECT NO. 95-0293 SAMPLE NO. 95454
SOURCE: GA PACIFIC CORP HDWD SAMPLE TYPE: SOIL
STATION -ID: 004-SL ,
CASE NO.: 23679 SAS NO.:
PROG ELEM: NSF COLLECTED
CITY: PLYMOUTH
COLLECTION START: 06/20/95
BY: D RUMFORD
ST: NC
1125 STOP: 00/00/00
D. NO.: KA95
*** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ***
•• •• • • •• ••
UG/KG
12UR 12U
12U
12U
JOU
12U
12U
12U
12U
12U
12U
12U
12U
12U
12U
12U
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
CHLOROMETHANE
BROMOMETHANE
VINYL CHLORIDE
CHLO RO ETHANE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
ACETONE
CARBON DISULFIDE
1,1-DICHLOROETHENE(1,1-DICHLOROETHYLENE) 1,1-DICHLOROETHANE
1,2-DICHLOROETHENE (TOTAL)
CHLOROFORM
1,2-DICHLOROETHANE
METHYL ETHYL KETONE
1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
***FOOTNOTES***
UG/KG
12U
12U
12U
12U 12U
12U
12U
12U
12U
12U
12U
12U
12U
12U
12U
12U 12U
20
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE
CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
TRICHLOROETHENE(TRICHLOROETHYLENE)
DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE
1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE
BENZENE
TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
BROMOFORM
METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE
METHYL BUTYL KETONE
TETRACHLOROETHENE(TETRACHLOROETHYLENE) 1,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
TOLUENE
CHLOROBENZENE ETHYL BENZENE
STYRENE
TOTAL XYLENES
PERCENT MOISTURE
*A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL *K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
*U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
~R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
--- - ---- --- -- --- --
PURGEABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA. 08/15/95
*** * * * * * * * * * *. * * * * * * *. + * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *** •• •• •• •• ••
PROJECT NO. 95-0293 SAMPLE NO. 95455
SOURCE, GA PACIFIC CORP HDWD SAMPLE TYPE, SOIL
STATION ID, 002-SL ·
CASE NO., 23679 SAS NO.,
PROG ELEM, NSF COLLECTED CITY, PLYMOUTH
COLLECTION START, 06/20/95
BY, D RUMFORD
ST, NC
1155 STOP, 00/00/00
*** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ***
D. NO., KAA96
•• •• •• •• ••
UG/KG
17UR
17U
17U
17U
40U
17U
17U
17U
17U 17U
17U
17U
10J
17U
17U
17U
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
CHLOROMETHANE
BROMOMETHANE
VINYL CHLORIDE
CHLO RO ETHANE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
ACETONE
CARBON DISULFIDE
1,1-DICHLOROETHENE(1,1-DICHLOROETHYLENE)
1,1-DICHLOROETHANE
1,2-DICHLOROETHENE (TOTAL)
CHLOROFORM
1,2-DICHLOROETHANE
METHYL ETHYL KETONE
1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
***FOOTNOTES***
UG/KG
17U
17U
17U
17U 17U
17U
17U
17U
17U 17U
17U
17U
17U
17U
17U 17U
17U
42
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE
CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
TRICHLOROETHENE(TRICHLOROETHYLENE)
DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE
1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE
BENZENE
TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE BROMOFORM
METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE
METHYL BUTYL KETONE
TETRACHLOROETHENE(TETRACHLOROETHYLENE)
1,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
TOLUENE
CHLOROBENZENE
ETHYL BENZENE
STYRENE
TOTAL XYLENES
PERCENT MOISTURE
*A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL *K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN *U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
*R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
----- ------ - ---- -
PURGEABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA. 08/15/95
*** * * * * * * * * * * * * * *. *. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *** •• •• •• •• ••
PROJECT NO. 95-0293 SAMPLE NO. 95456 SOURCE, GA PACIFIC CORP HDWD STATION ID, 009-SW -
CASE NO., 23679
SAMPLE TYPE, SURFACEWA
SAS NO.,
PROG ELEM, NSF COLLECTED CITY, PLYMOUTH
COLLECTION START, 06/19/95
D. NO., KA79
BY, D RUMFORD ST, NC
1350 STOP, 00/00/00
•• •• • • •• •• *** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *** UG/L
10UR
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U 10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
CHLOROMETHANE
BROMOMETHANE
VINYL CHLORIDE
CHLOROETHANE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
ACETONE
CARBON DISULFIDE
1,1-DICHLOROETHENE(1,1-DICHLOROETHYLENE)
1,1-DICHLOROETHANE
1,2-DICHLOROETHENE (TOTAL) CHLOROFORM
1,2-DICHLOROETHANE
METHYL ETHYL KETONE 1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
***FOOTNOTES***
UG/L
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE
CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
TRICHLOROETHENE(TRICHLOROETHYLENE)
DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE
1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE
BENZENE
TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
BROMOFORM
METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE
METHYL BUTYL KETONE
TETRACHLOROETHENE(TETRACHLOROETHYLENE)
1,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
TOLUENE
CHLOROBENZENE
ETHYL BENZENE
STYRENE TOTAL XYLENES
•A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT. ~R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
----

-
--

-
--------!11!1
PURGEABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA. 08/15/95
*** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *. * * * * * * *. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *. * * ••• **
**
**
**
**
PROJECT NO. 95-0293 SAMPLE
SOURCE, GA PACIFIC CORP HDWD STATION ID, 009-SD /
NO. 95457 SAMPLE TYPE, SOIL
CASE NO., 23679 SAS NO.,
PROG ELEM, NSF COLLECTED
CITY, PLYMOUTH
COLLECTION START, 06/19/95
BY, D RUMFORD ST, NC
1425 STOP, 00/00/00
***. * * * * * * * *. * * * * * *. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ***
D. NO., KA80
**
** **
**
**
UG/KG
25UR
25U
25U
25U
40U sou
25U
25U
25U
25U
25U
25U
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
27
25U
25U
25U
CHLOROMETHANE
BROMOMETHANE
VINYL CHLORIDE
CHLOROETHANE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE ACETONE
CARBON DISULFIDE
1,1-DICHLOROETHENE(1,1-DICHLOROETHYLENE)
1,1-DICHLOROETHANE
1,2-DICHLOROETHENE (TOTAL) CHLOROFORM
1,2-DICHLOROETHANE
METHYL ETHYL KETONE
1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
***FOOTNOTES***
UG/KG
25U
25U
25U
25U
25U
25U 25U
25U
25U
25U
25U
25U
25U
25U
25U
25U
25U
60
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE
CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
TRICHLOROETHENE(TRICHLOROETHYLENE)
DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE
1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE
BENZENE
TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
BROMOFORM
METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE
METHYL BUTYL KETONE
TETRACHLOROETHENE(TETRACHLOROETHYLENE)
1,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
TOLUENE
CHLOROBENZENE
ETHYL BENZENE
STYRENE
TOTAL XYLENES
PERCENT MOISTURE
*A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL *K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN *U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
•R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
--- - ---- -- --- ---1!!11!
PURGEABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA. 08/15/95
*** * ••• * ••• *. * * * * * * * * * * *. * * * *. * * *. *. * ••.•• * * * * •• *. * *. * * * * * * * * * *. * * *** •• •• •• •• ••
PROJECT NO. 95-0293 SAMPLE NO. 95458 SOURCE: GA PACIFIC CORP HDWD SAMPLE TYPE: SURFACEWA
STATION ID: 010-SW /
CASE NO.: 23679 SAS NO.:
PROG ELEM: NSF COLLECTED CITY: PLYMOUTH
COLLECTION START: 06/19/95
BY: D RUMFORD
ST: NC
1615 STOP: 00/00/00
D. NO.: KA81 *** *. * •• * *. * *. * * *. * *. *. * *. * * *. * * * •• * * *. *. * * * * * * *. * * * * *. * *. *. * •• *. ***
•• •• • • •• ••
UG/L
lOUR
lOU
lOU lOU
lOU
lOU
lOU
lOU
lOU
lOU
lOU
lOU
lOU lOU
lOU
lOU
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
CHLOROMETHANE
BROMOMETHANE
VINYL CHLORIDE
CHLO RO ETHANE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
ACETONE
CARBON DISULFIDE
1,1-DICHLOROETHENE(l,l-DICHLOROETHYLENE)
1,1-DICHLOROETHANE
1,2-DICHLOROETHENE (TOTAL) CHLOROFORM
1,2-DICHLOROETHANE
METHYL ETHYL KETONE
1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
***FOOTNOTES***
UG/L
lOU
lOU
lOU
lOU
lOU
lOU
lOU
lOU
lOU
lOU
lOU
lOU
lOU
lOU
lOU
lOU
lOU
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE
CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
TRICHLOROETHENE(TRICHLOROETHYLENE)
DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE
1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE
BENZENE
TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
BROMOFORM
METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE
METHYL BUTYL KETONE
TETRACHLOROETHENE(TETRACHLOROETHYLENE) 1,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE TOLUENE
CHLOROBENZENE
ETHYL BENZENE
STYRENE
TOTAL XYLENES
*A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL *K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
*U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
~R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION .
--- -- - -- -- -- --..
PURGEABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA. 08/15/95
*** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *. * * * * * * * * * * *** ** ••
** •• **
PROJECT NO. 95-0293 SAMPLE NO. 95459
SOURCE, GA PACIFIC CORP HDWD SAMPLE TYPE, SOIL
STATION ID, 010-SD -
CASE NO., 23679
PROG ELEM, NSF COLLECTED CITY, PLYMOUTH
· COLLECTION START, 06/19/95
BY, D RUMFORD ST, NC
1620 STOP, 00/00/00
UG/KG
19UR
19U
19U
19U
30U
40U
19U
19U
19U
19U
19U
19U
19U
19U
19U
19U
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
SAS NO., D. NO., KA82
*** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ***
**
**
**
**
**
CHLOROMETHANE
BROMOMETHANE
VINYL CHLORIDE
CHLO RO ETHANE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
ACETONE
CARBON DISULFIDE
1,1-DICHLOROETHENE(l,1-DICHLOROETHYLENE) 1,1-DICHLOROETHANE.
1,2-DICHLOROETHENE (TOTAL)
CHLOROFORM
1,2-DICHLOROETHANE
METHYL ETHYL KETONE 1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
***FOOTNOTES***
UG/KG
19U
19U
19U
19U 19U
19U
19U
19U
19U
19U
19U
19U
19U
19U
19U
19U
19U
47
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE
CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
TRICHLOROETHENE(TRICHLOROETHYLENE)
DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE
1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE
BENZENE
TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE BROMOFORM
METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE
METHYL BUTYL KETONE
TETRACHLOROETHENE(TETRACHLOROETHYLENE) 1,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE TOLUENE
CHLOROBENZENE ETHYL BENZENE
STYRENE
TOTAL XYLENES
PERCENT MOISTURE
*A-AVERAGE VALUE. *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL *K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
*U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
tR-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.-----
- --- -- -- -------
PURGEABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA. 08/15/95
*** * * * * * *. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *** **
**
** **
**
PROJECT NO. 95-0293 SAMPLE NO. 95460
SOURCE, GA PACIFIC CORP HDWD SAMPLE TYPE, SURFACWA
STATION ID, 109-SW
CASE NO., 23679 SAS NO.,
PROG ELEM, NSF COLLECTED
CITY, PLYMOUTH
COLLECTION START, 06/19/95
BY, D RUMFORD
ST, NC
1350 STOP, 00/00/00
*** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ·* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *. * * * * ***
D. NO., KA83
•• ** •• ••
**
UG/L
10UR
10U
lOU
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
lOU
10U 10U
10U
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
CHLOROMETHANE
BROMOMETHANE
VINYL CHLORIDE
CHLOROETHANE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
ACETONE
CARBON DISULFIDE
1,1-DICHLOROETHENE(l,1-DICHLOROETHYLENE) 1,1-DICHLOROETHANE .
1,2-DICHLOROETHENE (TOTAL)
CHLOROFORM
1,2-DICHLOROETHANE
METHYL ETHYL KETONE
1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
***FOOTNOTES***
UG/L
10U 10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
lOU
10U
10U 10U
lOU
10U
10U
10U
10U lOU
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE
CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
TRICHLOROETHENE(TRICHLOROETHYLENE)
DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE
1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE
BENZENE
TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE BROMOFORM
METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE
METHYL BUTYL KETONE
TETRACHLOROETHENE(TETRACHLOROETHYLENE) 1,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE TOLUENE
CHLO RO BENZENE
ETHYL BENZENE
STYRENE
TOTAL XYLENE$
*A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
*K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN *U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
•R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.
-- --- --- -----
PURGEABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA. 08/15/95
*** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *** •• •• •• •• ••
PROJECT NO. 95-0293 SAMPLE NO. 95461 SOURCE, GA PACIFIC CORP HDWD SAMPLE TYPE, SOIL
STATION ID, 109-SD
CASE NO., 23679 SAS NO.,
PROG ELEM, NSF COLLECTED
CITY, PLYMOUTH
COLLECTION START, 06/19/95
BY, D RUMFORD
ST, NC
1425 STOP, 00/00/00
*** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ***
D. NO., KA84
•• •• •• • • ••
UG/KG
24UR
24U
24U
24U sou
60U
24U
24U
24U
24U
24U
24U
24U
24U
24U
24U
CHLOROMETHANE
BROMOMETHANE
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
VINYL CHLORIDE
CHLO RO ETHANE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
ACETONE
CARBON DISULFIDE
1,1-DICHLOROETHENE(1,1-DICHLOROETHYLENE)
1,1-DICHLOROETHANE
1,2-DICHLOROETHENE (TOTAL)
.CHLOROFORM
1,2-DICHLOROETHANE
METHYL ETHYL KETONE
1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
***FOOTNOTES***
UG/KG
24U
24U
24U
24U
24U
24U
24U
24U
24U
24U
24U
24U
24U
24U
24U
24U
24U
59
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE
CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
TRICHLOROETHENE(TRICHLOROETHYLENE)
DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE
1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE
BENZENE
TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE BROMOFORM
METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE
METHYL BUTYL KETONE
TETRACHLOROETHENE(TETRACHLOROETHYLENE) 1,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE TOLUENE
CHLO RO BENZENE
ETHYL BENZENE
STYRENE
TOTAL XYLENES
PERCENT MOISTURE
*A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
*K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN
*U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
SR-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION .. ____ _
- -- -- --- --cm ---
PURGEABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT
SAMPLE AND·ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA. 08/15/95
*** ••• * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *** **
** **
**
**
PROJECT NO. 95-0293 SAMPLE NO. 95462
SOURCE, GA PACIFIC CORP HDWD SAMPLE TYPE, SURFACWA
STATION ID, 013-RN
CASE NO., 23679 SAS NO.,
PROG ELEM, NSF COLLECTED
CITY, PLYMOUTH
COLLECTION START, 06/19/95
BY, D RUMFORD
ST, NC
0700 STOP, 00/00/00
*** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *** D. NO., KA97
**
**
**
** **
UG/L
10UR 10U
10U
10U
10U
10U 10U
10U
10U
10U 10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
CHLOROMETHANE
BROMOMETHANE
VINYL CHLORIDE
CHLO RO ETHANE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
ACETONE
CARBON DISULFIDE
1,1-DICHLOROETHENE(1,1-DICHLOROETHYLENE) 1,1-DICHLOROETHANE
1,2-DICHLOROETHENE (TOTAL)
CHLOROFORM
1,2-DICHLOROETHANE
METHYL ETHYL KETONE
1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
***FOOTNOTES***
UG/L
10U
10U
10U 10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U 10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
10U
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE
CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
TRICHLOROETHENE(TRICHLOROETHYLENE)
DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE
1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE
BENZENE
TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE BROMOFORM
METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE
METHYL BUTYL KETONE
TETRACHLOROETHENE(TETRACHLOROETHYLENE) 1,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE TOLUENE
CHLOROBENZENE
ETHYL BENZENE
STYRENE
TOTAL XYLENES
*A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL
*K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN *U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
~R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA·UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR_VERIFICAT~ON•-.-----
----- --- -
11!!!!1 -- --- -
PURGEABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA. 08/15/95
*** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *** ••
**
** •• ••
PROJECT NO. 95-0293 SAMPLE NO. 95463 SOURCE: GA PACIFIC CORP HDWD STATION ID: 016-TP
CASE NO.: 23679
SAMPLE TYPE: SURFACEWA
SAS NO.:
PROG ELEM: NSF COLLECTED CITY: PLYMOUTH COLLECTION START: 06/19/95
D. NO.: KASS
BY: D RUMFORD
ST: NC
1300 STOP: 00/00/00
** •• •• •• •• *** * * *. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *** UG/L
lOUR
lOU
lOU
lOU
lOU
lOU
lOU
lOU lOU
lOU
lOU
lOU
lOU
lOU
lOU
lOU
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
CHLOROMETHANE
BROMOMETHANE
VINYL CHLORIDE
CHLO RO ETHANE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE ACETONE
CARBON DISULFIDE 1,1-DICHLOROETHENE(l,l-DICHLOROETHYLENE)
1,1-DICHLOROETHANE
1,2-DICHLOROETHENE (TOTAL) CHLOROFORM
1,2-DICHLOROETHANE METHYL ETHYL KETONE
1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
BROMODICHLOROMETHANE
***FOOTNOTES***
UG/L
lOU
lOU
lOU
lOU
lOU
lOU
lOU
lOU
lOU
lOU
lOU
lOU
lOU
lOU
lOU
lOU
lOU
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE
CIS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
TRICHLOROETHENE(TRICHLOROETHYLENE)
DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE 1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE
BENZENE
TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
BROMOFORM
METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE METHYL BUTYL KETONE
TETRACHLOROETHENE(TETRACHLOROETHYLENE)
1,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
TOLUENE
CHLO RO BENZENE ETHYL BENZENE STYRENE
TOTAL XYLENES
*A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES .•J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL *K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN *U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT. ~R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION.--------------l!!!l!I -----
I
I
I
I
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Region IV
Environmental Services Division
College Station Road, Athens, Ga. 30613
l****MEMORANDUM******
· I DATE: 08/05/95
SUBJECT:
I
I FROM:
I
Results of Spe'cified Analysis;
95-0293 GA PACIFIC CORP HDWD
PLYMOUTH NC
CASE NO: 23679
Charles H. Hooper ~~~.or~
Chief, Laboratory Evaluation/Quatlty
TO: PAT DEROSA
Assurance Section
'ttached are the results of analysis of samples collected as part of
ihe\subject project.
Is a result of the Quality Assurance Review, certain data qualifiers
mayihave been placed on the data. Attached is a DATA QUALIFIER
IEP\RT which explains the reasons that these qualifiers were required.
If you have any questions please contact me.
I
I
I
I
I
I
.I
ATTACHMENT
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
INORGANIC DATA QUALIFIERS REPORT
Case Number:_,2~3=6~7~9,_ _____________ _
Project Number:__.9~5~-~0~2=9:3 __________ _
Site: GA Pacific Corp Hdwd, Plymouth, NC
Element
A. Waters
Be, Cd, Co,
Mn, V
Al, Ba, Ca,
Mg, Zn
As
Pb
Hg
Cr
Pb
Pb
Se
Pb
Ni
Se
I Ml metals J Soils
Be, Cd, Co,
' V, Zn Mn, I
Al,
' Mg
Ba, Ca,
Cu,
Fe,
Cu,
Fe,
Flag
u
u
J
J
J
J
J
u
u
J
J
J
J
u
u
Samples Affected
All positives> IDL, but
< CRDL
All positives> IDL, but
< lOX contaminant level
All with Al or Fe
concentrations in solution
> 150,000 ug/L
All with Al or Fe
concentrations in solution
> 150,000 ug/L
All
All
MDKA93
MDKABl & 83
MDKA79
MDKA91
MDKA91
MDKA83
All samples
All positives> IDL, but
< CRDL
All positives> IDL, but
< lOX contaminant level
Reason
Baseline instability
Positives in blanks
Suspected over correction as noted
in the contractor res
Suspected over correction as noted
in the contractor res
Matrix spike recovery= 69.5%
Blind spike recovery< warning limit
% RSD > 20% for ICP multiple
exposures
% RSD >
exposures
CRDL
20% for ICP multiple
and results > IDL, but<
% RSD . >
exposures
CRDL
20% for
and result
Only analysis of 2X
required by contract
analysis
Only analysis of 2X
required by contract
analysis
Only analysis of 2X
required by contract
analysis
ICP multiple
> IDL, but <
CRDL standard
sow for ICP
CRDL standard
sow for ICP
CRDL standard
sow for ICP
Sample pH> 2.0 when received by the
laboratory for analysis
Baseline instability
Positives in blanks
·I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
INORGANIC DATA QUALIFIE~ REPORT (continued)
Case Nwnber:~2=3~6~7~9~-------------
Project Number:~9~5~-~0~2~9~3~-----------
Site: GA Pacific Corp Bdwd, Plymouth, NC
Element
Se
Sb
Zn
Ba
Ca
Cd
Cr
Co
Cu
Mg
Mn
Ni
K
V
K
As
Sb
Ni
Flag
J
J
J
J
J
R
J
J
R
J
R
J
R
J
R
J
R
J
R
J
J
J
u
u
u
Samples Affected
All with Al or Fe
Concentrations in solution
> 140,000 ug/L
All
All
All
All positives
All negatives
All
All positives
All negatives
All positives
All negatives
All positives
All negatives
All positives
All negatives
All positives
All negatives
All positives
All negatives
All
All
MDKA86 & 87
MDKA82 & 92
MDKA89
MDKA87
Reason
Suspected over correction as noted
in the contractor ICS
Matrix spike recovery = 69%
Serial dilution percent difference
12.8%
Blind spike recovery < warning limit
Blind spike recovery < action limit
Blind spike recovery< warning limit
Blind spike recovery< action limit
Blind spike recovery< action limit
Blind spike recovery < a.ction limit
Blind spike recovery< action limit
Blind spike recovery< action limit
Blind spike recovery< action limit
Blind spike recovery< warning limit
Blind spike recovery< action limit
% RSD > 20% for ICP multiple
exposures
% RSD > 20% for ICP multiple
exposures and results > IDL, but <
CRDL
% RSD > 23% .for ICP multiple
exposures and results > IDL, but <
CRDL
% RSD > 20% for ICP multiple
exposures and results > IDL, but <
CRDL
·I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
INORGANIC DATA QUALIFIERS REPORT (continued)
Case Number:_;;2~3~6~7Ll9'---------------
Project Number:_a9~5~-~0~2~9=--=.3 __________ _
Site: GA Pacific Corp Hdwd, Plymouth, NC
Element
As
Sb
Ni
Flag
J
J
J
Samples Affected
MDKA87, 88, & 94
MDKA95
MDKA82, 86, 88, 90, 92, 9.4,
& 96
Reason
Only analysis of 2X
required by contract
analysis
CRDL standard
SOW · for ICP
Only analysis of 2X CRDL
required by contract sow
analysis
standard
for ICP
Only analysis
required by
analysis
of 2X CRDL standard
contract sow for ICP
SPECIFIED ANALYSIS DATA REPORT
SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA. 08/04/95
*** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *** **
** ••
** ••
PROJECT NO. 95-0293 SAMPLE NO. 95469 SAMPLE TYPE: SEDIMSPK SOURCE: GA PACIFIC CORP HDWD PROG ELEM: NSF COLLECTED BY: ESAT
STATION ID: 0022790
CASE.NO.: 23679 SAS NO.:
CITY: PLYMOUTH ST: NC
COLLECTION START: 00/00/00 STOP: 00/00/00
D. NO.: MD NO: KA78
••
** ** ** •• *** * *. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ***
***FOOTNOTES***
RESULTS UNITS PARAMETER
150 MG/KG CYANIDE
*A-AVERAGE VALUE *NA-NOT ANALYZED *NAI-INTERFERENCES *J-ESTIMATED VALUE *N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL *K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN *L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN *U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT.
~ --- -----11!!!1!!1 -----