NCD000770487_20030429_Johnson Controls Battery Group_FRBCERCLA RA_Groundwater Sampling-OCR

July 16, 2003
Mr. Luis Flores
Remedial Project Manager
USEP A Region IV
61 Forsyth Street, 1 1th Floor
Atlanta, Georgia 30303
Re: Groundwater Sampling Results
April 29, 2003
Winston-Salem Facility
Dear Luis:
MWH Americas, Inc. (MWH) completed the second round of groundwater monitoring at
the JCBGI Winston-Salem facility on April 29, 2003. This letter presents the methods and
results of the sampling. Also attached is a copy of the comments we received from Randy
McElveen (NCDENR) on a draft copy of this same report, which he requested prior to
sending the report final to US EPA. We responded to Specific Comment #1 in this final
report to US EPA for clarification of the scope actually conducted during this sampling
round with the inclusion of SVOC analysis at MW0I. However, we believe that Specific
Comments #2 through #4, regarding future groundwater monitoring requirements for the
site, should be addressed as a permitting issue between JCBGI and NCDENR outside of
the EE/CA process. The EE/CA process is complete with respect to investigation for the
purpose of designing an appropriate remedy, of which groundwater monitoring was a part.
The completion of this second round of groundwater monitoring confirms that no remedial
action for groundwater was appropriate, as presented in the EE/CA. Based on our review
of this second round of data, we provide our recommendations for US EPA 's consideration
at the close of this report.
The groundwater sampling confirmation round 'includes analysis of metals, volatile organic
compounds, and pesticides in groundwater. Semi-volatiles and PCBs were explicitly
excluded from the list of analytes, based on the first round of sampling results reviewed
from the EE/CA investigation. However, by agreement with NCDENR, SVOCs were
included in the list of analytes for upgradient well MW0l, only, because this well had a
previous detection of bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate, a common sampling contaminant, above
it's MCL. The Quality Assurance Project Plan (QAPP) and Field Sampling Plan (FSP)
previously developed for the EE/CA guided this second round of confirmation groundwater
sampling and analysis.
A. Groundwater Sampling Methods
The field technicians sampled each of the 6 monitoring wells (MW-01 through MW-06)
using low-flow purge sampling techniques to obtain representative groundwater samples.
Prior to groundwater sampling, each monitoring well was purged. A clean plastic drop
cloth was spread around the well prior to purging. Purging was accomplished by removing
groundwater from the monitoring wells using a decontaminated, low-flow submersible
pump with new dedicated polyethylene discharge tubing. Purging continued until water
quality parameters, including pH, temperature, redox, conductivity, and turbidity, stabilized
and a minimum of 3 and maximum of 5 well volumes were removed or the well was
pumped dry. Purge water was containerized in 55-gallon drums.
One Science Court
P.O. Box 5385
Madison, Wisconsin
53705-0385
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Oeliverinp innovative Projects and Solutions Worldwide
• •
Once the wells were properly purged, groundwater samples were collected. The
groundwater samples for total metals analyses were collected directly from the
polyethylene tubing. The groundwater sample for dissolved metals analyses were field
filtered using a 0.45-micron inline filter with the polyethylene tubing and discharged into
the sample containers. The groundwater samples for VOCs and organochlorine pesticides
analyses were collected using a new, clean Teflon® bailer. Groundwater samples were
placed in appropriate sample containers, preserved, properly labeled, and stored on ice.
Chain of custody procedures were followed for collection and shipping the samples.
Field quality control (QC) samples were collected to assess the quality of the analytical
data and to evaluate sampling and analytical reproducibility (precision). Field quality
control samples consisted of one each of a duplicate sample, field blank, matrix spike/
matrix spike duplicate, and trip blank. Each QC sample was analyzed for all scheduled
parameters, except the trip blank, which was analyzed for VOCs, only.
The groundwater level and total depth of each monitoring well were measured using an
electronic water-level indicator to an accuracy of 0.01 feet prior to purging the well. The
water-level indicator was rinsed with deionized water prior to each use. The depth to
groundwater was recorded in the field logbook and the well volume was calculated.
Liquids from the decontamination of sampling equipment and sample purge water were
contained in 55-gal drums for later disposal or treatment by facility management.
B. Water Quality Analyses
Each of the six groundwater samples and QC samples were analyzed for the following
parameters:
Total TAL Metals
Dissolved T AL Metals voes
Organochlorine pesticides
3005A/6010B/7470A
3005A/6010B174 70A
5030B18260B
8081
In addition, the sample from well MW-01 was analyzed for SVOCs (Method 8270C). The
samples that were field filtered (FF) represent the Dissolved T AL Metals results.
CompuChem Laboratories of Research Triangle Park, NC conducted the analyses of the
groundwater samples.
C. Water Quality Results
The groundwater analytical results are presented in the attached Tables 1 through 4. The
April 29, 2003 data is presented adjacent to the January 29/30, 2001 data previously
submitted. Data qualifiers presented with the results are summarized and presented
following the tables. The following is a brief discussion of each class of parameters.
1. Metals
The following two tables present the minimum, mean, and maximum concentrations of
total and dissolved select metals, along with the number of detections from the six
groundwater monitoring wells. Please note that, the minimum value is the minimum
detected value (not non-detect, unless no detections were noted in any samples). The mean
is calculated from samples with detected concentrations. Further, QA duplicate samples
are not included within the number of detections. The tables below also identify the I SA
Mr. Luis Flores July 16 2003 USEPA Region IV
Page 2
• •
NCA 2L groundwater standards and the monitoring well locations where standards are
exceeded.
Total Select T AL Metals in Groundwater
Cadmium ND ND ND 0 1.8
Co er 4.3 4.3 4.3 I 1000
Iron 80.4 726.1 2320 4 300 MW0I MW06
Lead 4.9 4.9 4.9 I 15
Man anese 16.5 2 I 1.3 996 6 50 MW0I MW05 MW06
Nickel 3.5 5.6 7.1 3 100
Total ND ND ND 0 I.I
Mercur
Zinc 10.2 21.2 36.6 5 1050
*Sample locations: MW0I-MW06
Dissolved Select T AL Metals in Groundwater
Cadmium ND ND ND 0 1.8
Co er ND ND ND 0 1000
Iron 52.9 312.0 571 2 300 MW06
Lead ND ND ND 0 15
Man anese 15.6 541.5 3060 6 50 MW0I MW05 MW06
Nickel 1.4 1.9 2.7 2 100
Total 0.13 0.13 0.13 I.I
Mercur
Zinc 19.1 21.9 27.1 3 1050
*Sample locations: MW0I-MW06
Based on the information presented in the tables above, only total manganese was detected
in all 6 groundwater samples above the reporting limits. In contrast, total lead was detected
in only one sample (MW-01, 4.9 ug/L). Total aluminum and total iron were detected in 5
and 4 samples, respectively. Concentration ranges and mean values of total metals from
the April 2003 sampling are comparable to the January 2001 sampling, except that 5
samples had total aluminum above detection limits in the current sampling, as compared to
only one in the previous sampling.
As expected, the number of detections of dissolved metals from filtered samples is
generally less than the total metals detections. The exception is at well MW06, where
several metals were higher in the filtered sample than the total samples. The manganese
concentration was high enough in the filtered sample for MW06, that it skews the mean
value of the filtered samples. Similar to the total metals, only manganese was detected in
all 6 filtered groundwater samples. Lead was not detected in any of the filtered samples.
Aluminum was apparently filtered out of the samples, since none was detected. Maximum
iron and manganese concentrations are higher in the April 2003 sampling than the January
2001 sampling.
Groundwater standards were exceeded only for iron (in upgradient wells MW0\ and
MW06) and manganese (in wells MW0I, MW05, and MW06) in the total metal analyses.
Similarly, standards were exceeded in the dissolved metal analyses for iron (in well
Mr. Luis Flores July I 6, 2003
Page 3
USEPA Region IV
• •
MW06) and manganese (in wells MW0I, MW0S, and MW06). Iron and manganese are
generally ubiquitous in the environment and likely do not represent Site-derived
contamination. No other total or dissolved metals analyzed beyond the select metals
exceeded a groundwater standard.
The data confirm the site is not an important source of metals to the groundwater. The iron
and manganese concentrations are naturally occurring and are not considered Site-derived
contamination.
2. SVOCs
No SVOes were detected in the April 2003 groundwater sample from MW0I.
3. voes
The table below presents the list of voes detected in groundwater monitoring at the site,
the list of voes detected in April 2003 groundwater monitor, the I SA NeA 2L
groundwater standards, and the wells which exceeded the standard:
'"~wl!~:m;'?\\1/'iliB'y,,,i l~· , ~~ -.:t~~!'<!;i. ·1 .. ~,~ : *P.arameter1~~; .. ,,1. · , if~ ~-
~i,,m2003~~11! -oetffiii>iTslll ~
# of Samoles 6 (1)
1, 1,2.2 Tetrachloroethane 0
1,2 4 Trichlorobenzene 0
1,2,4 Trimethvlbenzene MW01,MW05
1,2-Dichlorobenzene 0
1,3,5-Trimethvlbenzene MW05
1,3-Dichlorobenzene 0
1 4-Dichlorobenzene 0
2-Butanone MW0I. MW05. MW06
2-Hexanone 0
Acetone MW0l, MW02, MW03,
MW04, MW05, MW06
Benzene MW01,MW04,
MW03 Duo
Chlorobenzene MW04 MW05, MW06
Bromodichloromethane 0
Carbon Disulfide 0
Chloroform MW0l, MW02, MW03,
MW04. MW05. MW06
Chloromethane 0
Cis-1,3-Dichloronronene 0
Dibromochloromethane 0
Methylene Chloride MW0l, MW02, MW03,
MW04, MW05, MW06
m&o Xvlenes MW0l
o-Xvlene 0
Stvrene 0
Tetrachloroethvlene 0
Toluene MW0l, MW02, MW03,
MW04, MW05, MW06
Trans-1-3-Dichloronronene 0
Trichloroethylene MW0l, MW04, MW05,
MW06
( 1) Sampling Locations: MW0 1 through MW06.
(2) Value is for total xylenes m, p & o
til5l\'\NGA',2£'.¥ IWlC:wlst~~
50
70
350
620
350
620
75
170
280
700
1
50
0.6
700
0.19
2.6
0.2
0.41
5
530 /2)
530 (2)
NS
0.7
1000
0.2
2.8
Mr. Luis Flores July 16 2003
Page 4
~-11~~~-'E""'"• if'tu/Stif wxceem ., ..
MW02,MW03,
MW04,MW05
USEPA Region IV
• •
Groundwater data indicates the presence of several voes detected at very low levels in site
monitoring wells. Several of these additional voes are apparently petroleum related
(benzenes, xylenes, toluene) and others are chlorinated or propenated compounds. The
April 2003 monitoring detected very minor amounts of 2-butanone, chlorobenzene, and
trichloroethylene, which were not detected in the January 2001 sampling. In contrast,
several compounds detected in the January 2001 sampling were not detected in the April
2003 results from any of the wells. In particular, background well MW0I had nine
compounds detected in the current sampling compared to 16 compounds in the previous
sampling.
Some compounds were detected in all 6 monitoring wells, including acetone, chloroform,
methylene chloride, and toluene, and appear to be present in both up gradient wells (MW0I,
MW04, MW06) and downgradient wells (MW02, MW03, and MW0S). Several VOCs
(methylene chloride, toluene, xylenes, dichlorodifluoromethane) were detected at low
levels in the laboratory blanks, and their results are qualified on the summary table. Most
other compounds were detected in a combination of upgradient and downgradient wells.
Acetone and methylene chloride was detected in other media from sampling conducted
during the EE/CA, but these constituents are often considered laboratory contaminants.
Neither toluene nor chloroform was detected in other media than groundwater from the
EE/CA. Nearly all of the VOC values were reported as estimated, because the values were
lower than the reporting limit but higher than the detection, with the exception of some
acetone and chloroform results.
Only chloroform exceeded a I SA NCA 2L groundwater standard of all_ the VOC
detections. Chloroform concentrations barely exceeded the standard (0.19 ug/L) in 4 of
the 6 groundwater samples in which it was detected, ranging from 0.2 ug/L to 0.3 ug/L.
All 4 samples where exceedances occurred were qualified as estimated values by the -
laboratory. Chloroform is a trihalomethane, often associated with drinking water
treatment.
These VOC data confirm previous results that the Site is not an important source of VOCs
to the groundwater.
4. Pesticides
The table below presents the list of pesticides detected in groundwater monitoring at the
site, the list of pesticides detected in April 2003 groundwater monitor, the I SA NCA 2L
groundwater standards, and the wells which exceeded the standard:
~}~earameterffic;c·_a_ .... ti-·a·[III &1fil'~f5:A!N6'A'i2L~1ttl i~wen~, ~1~tea1~~ -·, . lt",':~~ , r . i ~ rm ~-~,. . ..,.~ ;i:,.lk't i·v\,-wr:!f;' , i'~
.,';!~£bO,DS~,,:.:... i :.~-,ri ~ GW,Stils.~ . fl/ Jl).~_~eea.1.\!gl~!!,!.i , .... ""•"··""""'"' j_ . -~--J.. •. i,;;{-,-.,...c,,. .... :r. .
# of Samples 6
Samnle Locations MW0l throu~h MW06
Aldrin 0 NS
Alpha BHC 0 0.019 (I)
Aloha Endosulfan 0 NS
Aloha Chlordane 0 0.027
Beta BHC 0 0.019(1)
DDD 0 0,14
Delta BHC MW06 0.019 /1) MW06
Endrin ketone 0 2,1
Gamma Chlordane 0 0.027
Hwtachlor MW06 0.008 MW06
Heptachlor Expoxide 0 0.004
(I) Value 1s for total BHC
Mr. Luis Flores July I 6, 2003 USEPA Region IV
Page 5
• •
Two pesticide compounds were detected in the groundwater sample from well MW06 in
the April 2003 groundwater monitoring compared to 10 compounds detected in up to 4
wells in the January 2001 monitoring. Only minor concentrations of delta BHC (0.078
ug/L) and Heptachlor (0. 13 ug/L) were detected, both in upgradient well MW06 in April
2003. Both of these compounds exceeded their respective I SA NCA 2L groundwater
standard. Heptachlor had not been detected in the January 2001 results. Well MW06 is
considered an upgradient well, so these compounds may not be Site-related. Further, no
pesticides were detected in downgradient wells at the Site.
Overall, these pesticide results present an improvement in water quality since the January
2001 monitoring. The data confirm that the Site is not an important source of pesticides to
the groundwater. ·
D. Groundwater Flow
I. Water Levels
A summary of water level measurements from the monitoring wells and staff gages is
presented in the attached table. The depth to groundwater on April 29, 2003 ranged from
approximately 24 ft (MW04) to 37 ft (MW0S) below land surface. Groundwater elevations·
on April 29, 2003 ranged from 882.15 ft ms! at well MW06, at the southeast comer of the
Facility building, to 851.74 ft ms! at well MW02, located downgradient from the north end
of the Facility building. The depths to water measured at each well are consistent with data
collected in 2001.
2. Groundwater Flow
Similar to the previous interpretation of groundwater elevations (EE/CA Figure 5),
groundwater flows from the topographically high area around the Facility toward the west
and northwest, in the direction of Lowery Mill Creek. The topographically high area
around the Facility is likely a local groundwater recharge area, while the wetlands and
Lowery Mill Creek are the groundwater discharge areas.
E. Conclusions
Based on the results of the April 2003 groundwater monitoring, the following conclusions
are drawn:
• Lead was only detected in one groundwater sample, and its concentration was
below the I SA NCA 2L groundwater standard. Groundwater standards were
exceeded only for iron and manganese in the total and dissolved metal analyses.
Iron and manganese are generally ubiquitous in the environment and likely do not
represent Site-derived contamination.
• No SVOCs were detected in groundwater.
• Groundwater data indicates the presence of several VOCs detected at very low
levels, in site monitoring wells. Only chloroform exceeded a I SA NCA 2L
groundwater standard of the VOC detections. The four samples where exceedances
occurred were qualified as estimated values by the laboratory.
Mr. Luis Flores July 16 2003
Page 6
USEPA Region IV
• •
• Only two pesticide compounds were detected in one upgradient well, but both
exceeded groundwater standards. Ten compounds were detected in up to 4 wells in
the January 2001 monitoring, so these current results present an improvement in
water quality. Pesticides may not be Site related.
These results
groundwater.
necessary.
indicate that the Site is not an important source of contaminants to the
Therefore, we recommend that no further groundwater monitoring is
If you have any questions about this information, please contact the undersigned.
Sincerely,
MWH AMERICAS, INC.
~~iu_~
Daniel W. Hall, PG
Project Manager
Enclosure: Summary Tables of Groundwater Analytical Data
Summary of Water Table Elevations
NCDENR letter dated July 3, 2003
cc: Timothy J. Lafond, JCBGI
Randy McElveen, NCDENR
Dennis Reis, LLC
DWH/vlr/LBL
N :\lobs\208\2593\01 \wp\ltr\99 Flores.doc
2082593.01160101-MADI -
Mr. Luis Flores July 16, 2003
Page 7
USEPA Region IV
Location ldmtification MW-01
Field Sample Identification MW-01
Sample Type Nonna\
Date Collected 1/29/2001
Fixed Lab Metals (pg/I)
Aluminum 299 *
Antimony <3.5 u
Arsenic <3.9 un
Barium 44.4 eJ
Bcryllium <0.2 u
Cadmium <0.4 u
Calcium 2340 *
Chromium. Total 4.6 b
Cobalt 4.9 b
Copper 6.3 U
''°" 527 *nJ
Lead 12.9
Magnesium 1180
Manganese 747 *
Mercury <0.1 u
Nickel 7.9
Potassium 2270 *
Selenium <3.9 unR
Silver <0.8 u
Sodium 3570 eJ
Thallium <5.1 un
Vanadium 1.2 b
Zinc 37.5
Notes:
I. NS= No Standard established
2. (FF),. Field filtered.
3. Qualifiers summarized at end of section.
ATF/vh-/LBL
N:\Jobs\208\2593\GW Quality.ds (FIXED METALS IN WG)
2082593.0I 160101 MADI
7/16/2003
MW-OJ
MW-01
Normal
4/29/2003
1550
<\Ou
<JO u
68.4 e
0.16 b
<5"
551 be
9.7
4b
4.3 b
2320
4.9
l040e
130 e
<0.2 u
7.1
2410
<5"
<5"
1220 b
<!Ou
6.6 b
36.6 *
MW-01 (FF)
MW-01
Normal
1129noo1
<13.8 u
<3.5 u
<3.9 u
34
<0.2 u
<0.4 u
2140
<0.9 u
4.0b
5.7 U
<9.8 u
5.3
1050
653
<0.1 u
4.8bU
1960
<3.9 un
<0.8 un
2500 eJ
7.0bU
<0.5 u
"
SUMMARY OF FIXED METALS
RESULTS IN GROUND WATER SAMPLES
JOHNSON CONTROLS BATTERY GROUP, INC.
WINSTON SALEM, NORTH CAROLINA
PLANT AREA
MW-01 (FF) MW-02 MW-02
MW-01 MW-02 MW-02
Nonna! Normal Normal
4129noo3 l/29/2001 4/30/2003
<\OOu 383" 23.2 b
<!Ou <3.5 u <\Ou
<\Ou <3.9 un <!Ou
41.9 e 46.5 eJ 52.3 e
<5" <0.2 u 0.47 b
<5" <0.4 u <5"
439 b 4320 * 2760 e
<5" 11.6 1.3 b
2.3 b 2.6 b <5"
<5" 4.5 bU <5"
<\00 u 567 *nJ <IOOu
<3" 4.o <3"
586 b 894 b 716 be
64.8 e 112 * 16.8 e
<0.2 u <0.1 u <0.2 u
1.7 b 17.8 <5"
1830 1750 * 1600
2.6 un <3.9 unR <5"
<5" <0.8 u <5,
776 b 6150 eJ 4110
<IOu <5.1 un <!Ou
<20, 0.89 b <20 u
<20, 40.1 U 17.7 b*
I of 3
MW-02 (FF) MW-02 (FF) MW-03 MW-03
MW-02 MW-02 MW-03 MW-03 HH SSL
Normal Nonna! Nonna! Normal Groundwater
1n912001 4/30/2003 113onoo1 4/30/2003 15A NCA 2L
<13.8 u <IOOu 1160 * <IOOu NS • <3.5 u <!Ou <3.5 u 4.8 b NS
<3.9 u <!Ou <3.9 un <\Ou 0.02
37.3 51 • 40.3 eJ 66.8 e 2,000
<0.2 u 0.41 b 0.21 bU, J <5" NS
<0.4 u <5" <0.4 u <5" 1.8
4210 2490 28300" 11500 e NS
<0.9 u <5" 7.8 3.3 b 50
L7bU <5" 2.9 bJ. <5, NS
4.8 bU <5" 3.1 bU.J <5" 1000
10.6 b <IOOu 1210 *nJ <I00u 300
<2.6u <3" <2.6u <3 " 15
818 b 726 b 4630 4520 e NS
96.5 16.3 e 268 * 16.5 e 50
<0.J u <0.2 u <0.1 u <0.2 u 1.1
6.6 <5" 6.8 U <5" 100
1700 1830 5990" 3520 NS
<3.9 un 2.6 un <3.9 unR <5" 50
<0.8 un <5" <0.8 u 0.87 b 17.5
5120eJ 4100 8870 eJ 5890 NS
7.1 bU <!Ou <5.1 un <10 u NS
<0.5 u <20, 4.0 bJ I.I b NS
30.4 <20, 15.6bU 19.6 b* 1050 •
location Identification MW-03
Field Sample Identification MW•DUP-01
Sample Type Field Duplicate
Date Collected 1/30/2001
Fixed Lab Metab (µg/1)
Aluminum 884 *
Antimony <3.5 u
Arsenic <3.9 un
Barium 30.2 eJ
Beryllium <0.2 u
Cadmium <0.4 u
Calcium 23500 *
Chromium, Total 124
Cobalt 4.2 b
Copper 66 .,. 1840 *nJ
L<,d <2.6u
Magnesium 4450
Manganese 291 *
M=nry <0.1 u
Nickel 110
Potassium 5170 •
Selenium <3.9 unR
Silver <0.8 u
Sodium 7510 eJ
Thallium <5.1 un
Vanadium 3.1 b
Zinc 96.8
Notes:
I. NS = No Standard established
2. (FF) = Field filtered.
3. Qualifiers summarized at end of sect
ATF/vlr/LBL
N:\Jobs\208\2593\GW Quality.xis (FIXED METALS IN WG)
2082593.0i 160101 MADI
7/1612003
MW-03 MW-03 (FF)
MW.DUP-01 MW-03
Field Duplicate Nonna!
4/30/2003 l/30/2001
<100 u <13.8 u
<10 u <3.5 u
<JO u <3.9 u
68.1 e 40.7
<5 n <0.2 u
<5 n <0.4 u
12000e 18300
3.2 b <0.9 u
<5" 3.7 b
<5" 25.6
31.1 b 24.8 b
<3 n <2.6 u
4710e 4650
16.8 e 297
<0.2 u <0.1 u
<5 n 4.8bU
3910 4860
<Sn <3.9 un
<5 n <0.8 un
6250 6830 eJ
<!Ou 6.3 bU
1.7 b 1.7 b
19.S b* 41.6
SUMMARY OF FIXED METALS
RESULTS IN GROUND WATER SAMPLES
JOHNSON CONTROLS BATTERY GROUP, INC.
WINSTON SALEM, NORTH CAROLINA
PLANT AREA
MW-03 (FF) MW-03 (FF) MW-03 (FF)
MW-03 MW•DUP-01 MW-DUP-01
Normal Field Duplic.ate Field Duplicate
4/30/2003 I/J0/'2001 4/30/2003
<JOOu 259U <IOOu
<IO u <3.5 u <10 u
<10u <3.9 u <!Ou
63' 21 63 e
<5 n <0.2 u <5 n
<5 n <0.4 u <5 n
10900 24100 11000
2.4 b 24.4 1.9 b
<5 n 3.7 b <5"
<5 n 70.6 <5 n
<IOOu 967 <IOOu
<3 n <2.6u <3 n
4250 4440 4320
15.6 e 287 16 e
<0.2 u <0.1 u <0.2 u
<5 n 52.5 <5 n
3720 5310 3950
2.6 un <3.9 IW 2.6 un
<5 n <0.8 un <5 n
5580 6720 eJ 5590
<10 u 7.9bU <!Ou
<20n 1.9b <20n
19.4 b 98.6 11.S b
MW-04
MW•04
Normal
1/29/2001
60.5 b*U
<3.5 u
<3.9 un
74.6 eJ
<0.2 u
<0.4 u
2790 *
<0.9 u
<0.6 u
<0.9u
72.1 b*nU, J
<2.6 u
881 b
904 *
<0.1 u
2.4 bU
3770 *
<3.9 unR
<0.8 u
4430 eJ
<5.1 un
<0.5 u
7.9bU
2 ofJ
MW-04 MW-04 (FF) MW-04(FF)
MW-04 MW--04 MW·04 HIISSL
Normal Normal Normal Groundwater
4/29/2003 1/29/2001 4/29/2003 ISA NCA 2L
49.7 b <13.8 u <IOOu NS • <10 u <3.5 u <!Ou NS
<10 u <3.9 u <I Ou 0.02
64.5 e 70.8 60.2 e 2,000
<5 n <0.2u <5 n NS
<5 n <0.4 u <5 n 1.8
916 be 2780 885 b NS
1.9 b <0.9u I b 50
<5" <0.6 u <5 n NS
<5" 2.3 bU <Sn 1000
80.4 b <9.8 u <lOOu 300
<3 n <2.6u <3 n 15
447 be 856b 413 b NS
38.1 e 826 31.Je 50
<0.2 u <0.1 u 0.13 b 1.1
<5 n 2.7bU <5 n 100
3460 3770 3460 NS
<5 n <3.9 un 2.6 un 50
1.2b <0.8 un <5 n 17.5
1960 b 3520 eJ 1570 b NS
<10 u 7.4 bU <I Ou NS
<20n <0.5 u <20u NS
22. 6.0bU 19.1 b 1050 •
location Identification
Field Sample Jdt11tificatio11
Sarnplt Typt
Datt Collected
Fixed Lab Metals (pg/I)
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Bariun1
Beryllium
Cadmium
Calcium
Chromium, Total
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Potassium
Selenium
Silver
Sodium
Tha\lium
Vanadium
Zinc
Notes:
I. NS = No Standard established
2. (FF)._ Field filtered.
3. Qualifiers summarized at end of sect
ATF/vlr/LBL
N:\Jobs\208\2593\GW Quality.xis (FIXED METALS IN WG)
2082593.01160101 MADI
7/1612003
MW-OS MW-OS
MW-05 MW-05
Normal Normal
1/30/2001 4129/2003
970 * 90 b
<3.5 u <\Ou
<3.9 un <\Ou
62.9 eJ 52.5 C
<0.2 u <5"
<0.4 u <5"
1580 * 559 be
20 8.9 u
5.0 1.4 b
7.7U <5"
1360 *nJ 184
5.5 <3"
936 b 583 be
404• 70.6e
<0.1 u <0.2 u
18.S "' 3150 * 2670
<3.9 unR <5"
<0.8 u <5"
4920 eJ 1680 b
<5.1 un <\Ou
2.8 b <20 u
25.1 15.3 b"
SUMMARY OF FIXED METALS
RES.UL TS IN GROUND WATER SAMPLES
JOHNSON CONTROLS BATTERY GROUP, INC.
WINSTON SALEM, NORTH CAROLINA
PLANT AREA
MW-05(FF) MW-05 (FF) MW-06
MW-05 MW-05 MW-06
Normal Normal Normal
1!3012001 4/29/2003 1/3012001
273 <JOOu 168 •u
<3.5 u <\Ou <3.5 u
<3.9 u <\Ou <3.9 un
45.8 46. 43.S eJ
<0.2 u 0.13 b <0.2 u
<0.4u <5" <0.4u
1450 526 b 3660"
<0.9 u 1.8 b 1.3 b
l.7bU 1.2b <0.6u
4.5bU <5" 2.7bU
212 52.9 b 176 *nJ
<2.6 u <3" 5.4
761 b 531 b 1190
326 60.8 e 1130*
<0.1 u <0.2 u <O.J u
5.5 U 2.7 b 2.9bU
3030 2580 2900 *
<3.9 un 2.6 un <3.9 unR
<0.8 un • <5" <0.8 u
3740 eJ 1650 b 4580 eJ
6.4 bU <\Ou <5.1 un
<0.5 u <20, <0.5 u
10.4 bU <20" 13.4bU
3 of3
MW-06 MW-06 (FF) MW-06 (FF)
MW-06 MW-06 MW-06 HH SSL
Normal Normal Normal Groundwater
4/29/2003 1!3012001 4/29/2003 ISA NCA 2L
133 <13.8 u <\OOu NS • <\Ou <3.Su <\Ou NS
<10 u <3.9 u <\Ou 0.02
58.4 e 38.8 57.4 C 2,000
<5" <0.2 u <5, NS
<5" <0.4 u <5" 1.8
2080e 3710 3470 NS
6.7 <0.9 u 0.89 b 50
<5" <0.6 u <5" NS
<5" 3.5 bU <5" 1000
320 <9.8 u 571 300
<3" 4.7 <3" 15
996 be 1140 1250 NS
967 e l050 3060 e 50
<0.2 u <0.1 u <0.2 u 1.1
3.S b 4.2bU 1.4 b 100
3110 28IO 3090 NS
<5" <3.9 un 2.6 un 50
<5" <0.8 un <5" 17.5
2560 3790 eJ 2360 NS
<JO u 8.1 bU <!Ou NS
<20" <0.5 u <20" NS
10.2 b* !2.3 bU 27.1 1050 •
Location lden1ijkt1tion
Field Sa,,.pfe ldenl/fittlfion
Sa,,.ple TJ.pe
Dt11t' Collected
Vola!tle Ora:ank Compounds {µefl)
].I .1-TrichlorOf'lhane
I , 1,2,2-Teirac:hloroeth.we
1.1.2-Trichloroethane
I, 1-Dichloroethane
I, 1-Dichloroethene
I .2,4-Trich!orobcnune
1.2,4-Trimethyfbenzenc
t .2-Dichlorobenzene
1.2-Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloroprop:me
1.3.S•Trimethylbenzene (Mesitylrne)
1,3-Dich\orobenzene
1,4-Dich!orobenzene
2-B11tanone (Methyl ethyl ketone)
2-Hexanone
4-Melhy\-2-pentanone (Methyl isobutyl ketone)
Acetone ·-· Bromodiehloromethane
Bromofonn
Bromomethane
Carbon disulfide
Carbon tetrachloride
Chlorobenzene
Chloroethane
Chloroform
Chloromclhane
cis-1,2-Dichloroethylenc
cis-1.l-Dichloropropene
Dibromochloromelhane
Dibmmomethane
DichJorodinuoromethane
Elhylbcnzene
Hela,;hlorob11w:lirnc
Xylcncs, o &. m
Methylene chloride
o-Xylrne (l .2·Dimethylbcnzene) s,,,..
Tetrachloroelhylcne(PCE)
Toluene
trarui-1,2-Dichloroethenc
trans· l ,J-Dichloropropenc
T richloroethylenc: (TCE)
TrichloroOuoromethane
Vinyl acetate
Viffyl chloride
Notes:
I. NS-No Standard established
2 Qualifim summarized at end ofse,;tion
ATF/vlrlLBL
N:IJobs\20812593\GW Quality.ds (VOC JN WG)
2082593.0I 16010! MADI
711612003
SUM~1ARY Of \'OLA TILE ORGANIC COMPOUND RESULTS IN GROUND WATER SAMPLES
JOHNSON CONTROLS BATTERY GROUP, INC.
MW-01 MW-01
MW-01 MW..01
Normal Normal
1n9noo1 4/29nOOJ
<0.5 II <0.5 u
<0.5 u <0.5 II
<0.5 u <0 5 II
<O 5 u <0.5 u
<O.Su <0.5 u
o.s J <0.5 u
0.2 JJ O.o2Jh
O.J JJ <O 5"
<O.S u <0.5 u
<0 5 II <0.5 u
0.2 JJ <0.5 u
0.2 JJ <O.S u
0.3 JJ <0.5 II
<3.0 II IJ
2.0 JJ <3'
<3.0 u <"
14 UJ 2 J
<0.5 II 0.08 Jb
1.0 J <0.5 u
<0 Su <0.5 II
<O.S II <0.5 II
<0.5 II <O.S 11
<O.S 11 <0.5 u
<O 5" <0.5 II
<0.5 u <0.5 II
9.0 J o.os J
0.7 J <0.5 II
<O 5 u <O.S u
<Q,5 II <0.5 11
0.2 JJ <0.5 II
<O.S u <Q.5 II
<0 5 II <0.5 II
<0.5 u <0.5 II
<O.S u <O Su
0.4 JJ 0.1 Jb
<0.5 II 0.2 Jb
0.2 JJ <0.5 u
0.1 JJ <0.5 11
<0.5 II <0.5 u
0.3jUJ 0.4Jb
<0.5 II <0.5 u
<0.5 u <0.5 II
<0.5 II 0.03 Jb
<O.S 11 <0.5 II
<1.0 II <!'
<0.5u <0.5 u
WINSTON SALEM, NORTH CAROLINA
PLANT AREA
MW..02 MW-02 MW-OJ
MW.OZ MW-02 MW.OJ
Normal Normal Normal
Jn912001 4/JOnOOJ 11Jono01
<O.S u <O.S u <0.5 u
<0.5 u <OS u 0.2 JJ
<O 5 u <0.5 u <0.5 II
<OS u <0.5 II <0.5 u
<0.5 u <0.5 II <0.5 u
<O.S u <O.S u <0 Su
<0.S u <0.5 u <0.5 u
<0.5 u <0.5 u 0.2 JJ
<0.5 u <0.5 ll <0.5 u
<0.5 11 <O.Su <0.5 u
<0.5 U <OS u <0.5 u
<0.5 U <0.5 u <0.5 u
<0.5 u <0.5 u <0.5 II
<3.0 u <3' <3.0 u
<3 Ou <3' <3.0 u
<3.0 u <3' <3.0 u
5.0 U IJ <3 0 II
<O 5" <0.5 u <0.5 u
5.0 <0.5 II <0.5 u
<0.5 u <0.5 u <O.S u
<0.5 U <0 5 u <0.5 II
<0.5 11 <0.5 II 0.9 J
<O.S 11 <O.S u <0 5 11
<0.5 II <0.5 II <0.5 II
<O.S u <0 5 11 <0.5 11
17 0.2 J 3.0 J
<Q.5 11 <0.5 u <0.5 II
<0.5 11 <0.S u <0.5 u
<0.5 11 <0.5 II <Q.5 II
0.6 <0.5 II 0.2 JJ
<0.5 11 <0.5 II <O 5"
<0.5 11 <O.Su <0.5 u
<0.5 II <0.5 u <0.S 11
<0 5 u <0.5 II <0.5 II
<I.Ou <" <1.0 II
<0.5 11 0.2 Jh <0.5 II
<0.5 11 <0.S u <0.5 II
<0.5 II <0 5 11 <O.S 11
<0 5 u <0.5 II 0.2jUJ
0.2JU 0.,4 jb <0.5 II
<0.5 II <0.5 II <0.5 u
<0.5 II <0.S u 0.2 JJ
<0.5u <0.5 II <0.5 u
<0 5 u <0.5 II <0.5 II
<1.0u <!' <I.Ou
<O.S II <0.5 u <0.5 II
MW-OJ
MW.OJ
Normal
4/JMOOJ
<0.5 u
<0.5 u
<0.5 u
<0.5 u
<O.S u
<0.S u
<0.5 u
<0.5 u
<0.5 II
<0.5 u
<O.S u
<O.S u
<0.5 II
<J'
<"
<3"
2 J
<0.5 u
<0.5 II
<O.S u
<0.5 II
<0.5 II
<0.5 II
<0.5 II
<0.S u
I
<0.5 II
<O.S u
<0.5 II
<O.S u
<O.S u
<0.5 II
<0.5 II
<0 5 II
<!'
0.3 Jb
<0.5 II
<0.5 II
<0 5 11
O.J Jb
<0.5 II
<0.5 II
<0.5 II
<0.5 II
<,'
<0.5 II
I of2
MW-OJ MW-OJ
MW-OUP-01 MW-DUP..01 HHSSL
fleld Dupllcate field Duplkale Groundwater
1/JMOOI 4130/2003 !SA NCA lL
<o Su <0.5 u ,oo
<O.S u <0.5 u 0.17
<0.5 u <0.5 II NS
<0.5 II <0.5 II 700
<0.5 II <0 5 II 7
<O 5 u <O.S u 70
<o.5 u <0.5 u 350
<0.5 u <0.5 u 6,0
<o.s u <O.S 11 0.38 • <o.s u <0.5 u 0.56
<0.5 II <0.5 u 350
<OS u <OS u "' <0.5 II <O.S 11 75
<3.0 II 'J ,10
<J,0 u <3' 2,0
<3.0 u <J' NS
<3.0 II 3 700
<o.5 u 0.04 Jb ' <0,5 II <0.5 u 0.6
<o.s u <0.5 II 0.19
<0.5 II <0.5 11 NS
"' <0.5 II 700
<o 5 u <0.5 u 03
<0.5 II <0.5 II 50
<0.5 u <0.5 u 2'00
3,0 J ' 0.19
<O 5' <0.5 u 2.6
<o.s 11 <0.5 II 70
<0.5 11 <O.S II 0.2
<o.5 u <0.5 II 0.41
<o s u <O.S 11 NS
<O.S u <O.S u '400
<0.5 II <0.S 11 29
<o.s u <O.S u 0 .. • <I.Ou <,' 530
<0 5 II O.J Jb 5
<0.5 11 <0.5 II 530
<0.5 II <0.5 II NS
<0.5 II <0.5 u 0.7
<0.5 u 0.3 Jb "''° <0.5 u <0.5 II 70
<Q.5 II <0.5 II 0.2
<0.5 II <0.5 II 2.8
<o.s 11 <0.5 u 2'00
<1 0 u <," NS
<0.5 II <0.5 II 0.015
ATF!vlr/1.BL
N:\Job!i\208\2593\GW Quality.xis {VOC IN WG)
2082593.0l 160101 MADI
7116/2003
SUMMARY OF VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUND RESULTS IN GROUNDWATER SAMPLES
JOHNSON CONTROLS BATTERY GROUP, INC.
lo,:atio11 lde11tijlc111io11
Fidd Sample fdc11tijie111io11
Sample T,-pe
Date Col/med
Volatllc Ore:i.nk Compounds (11£11)
1.1,1-T richlorocthanc
I, l .2.2-Tc1rachlorocthanc
I, l .2-Trichlorocthanc
I. !-Dichloroctha:nc
1,l-Dichlorocthcnc
1.2.4-T rich!orobcnzenc
1,2.4-Trimethylbrnzrnc
1,2-Dichlorob=c
l .2-Dichlorocthanc
1,2-Dichloropropane
1,3 ,5-Trimcthylbenzcne {Mcsitylcne)
1.3-Dichlorobcnzcnc
I ,4-Dichlorobenzenc
2-B11tanonc (Methyl ethyl ketone)
2-Heunone
4-Mcthyl-2-pcntanone (Methyl isob11tyl ketone)
Acetone -..
Bromodichloromcthanc
Bromofonn
Bromomethanc
Carbon disulfide
Carbon tetr:i.chloridc
Chlorobcnzcnc
Chlorocthanc
Chloroform
Chloromcthane
cis-1.2-Dkhlorocthylcnc
cis-1.3-Dichloropropcnc
Dibromochloromcthane
Dibromomethane
Dich!orodi011oromcthane
Ethylbcnzenc
Hcxachlorobuiadicne
Xylcncs. o &. m
Methylene chloride
o-X ylcne { 1,2-Dimethylbcnzcne)
Styrene
Tctrachlorocthylcne(PCE)
Toluene
lranS· \ ,1.-Diehlorocthcnc
trans-1,.3-Dicbloropropcnc
Trichlorocthylcnc (TCE)
Trichlorofl11oromcthanc
Vinyl acciatc
Vinyl chloride
Notes
I. NS• No Standard established
2 Qu.alilieis s11mm.irixcd at end of5tttion
MW-04
MW-04
Normal
WINSTON SALEM, NORTH CAROLINA
PLANT AREA
MW--0-I MW-05
MW-04 MW-05
Normal Normal
11291200\ 4/29/2003 1/3012001
<o.s" <0 5 II <O.S 11
<0.5 II <0.S 11 <0.5 II
<o.5 u <0.5 11 <0.Su
<0.S u <0.5 II <0.S 11
<o s u <0.5 II <0 5 u
<()'" <0 Su <0.5 II
<0.5 II <OS u <0.5 II
<0 5 II <0.5 II 0.3 jJ
<0 5 II <0.5 II <0 5 u
<0,5 u <0.5 II <0.5 II
<0 5 u <0.S u <0.5 II
<0.5 II <0 5 II 0.2 JJ
<0.5 II <0.5 u 0.2 JJ
<3.0 11 <3" <J.0 11
<3.0 II <3" <3.0 u
<3,0 u <3" <3.0 II
<3 0 u 3 10 UJ
o.3 l 0.06Jb <0.5 II
1.0 <0.5 II 2.0 J
<o.s u <0.5 II <OSu
<0 5 II <0.5 II <0 5 u
3.0 <0.S u <0.5 II
<o.s u <0.5 u <0.5 II
<0.5 II · 0.04 J <0.5 II
<0.5 II <0.5 II <0.5 II
12 0.2 J 10 J
<o.s u <0 Su <0 5 u
<0.5 II <0 5 11 <0.5 II
<0.5 II <0.5 II 0.2 JJ
<0 5 11 <0.5 II o.s J
<o.s u <O'" <0 5 11
<0.5 II 0.06 j <0.5 u
<0.5 II <0.5 II <0.S u
<0.5 II <0.5 II <0.5 u
<I.Ou <I" <1.0 u
o., 0.J jb O.S UJ
<0.5 II <0 S 11 0.2 JJ
<o.s u <0.5 II <0.5 u
<0.5 II <0.5 II <0.S u
<0.5 II 0.3 Jb 0 2jUJ
<0.5 u <O.S u <0.S u
<0.5 II <0.S u 0.2 JJ
<0.5 II 0.06Jb <0.5 u
<o.s" <0.S 11 <0.5 u
<LO u <I " <I.Ou
<0 5 11 <0.5 II <0.S u
MW-OS MW-06
MW-OS MW-06
Normal Normal
4/2912003 1/301200\
<0.5 11 <0.511
<0.5 II <0.S u
<0.S u <0.5 II
<0.5 11 <0,5 u
<0.5 11 <0 5 II
<0 5 11 <o.5 11
0.02 J <0.5 II
<0.5 II <0.5 II
<0.5 11 <0 5 II
<0 Su <0.5 II
0.03 J <0.5 11
<0.5 II <o.s 11
<0.5 II <0.5 u
I) <3.0 u
<3" <3.0 II
<3" <J.0u
3 8.0U
<0.5 u <0.5 II
<0.5 u 1.0
<OSu <0,5 u
<0.S u <0.S 11
<0 5 II <0.5 II
<0.5 II <0.5 II
0.Ollj <0.5 II
<0 5 u <0,5 u
0.3 j " <0.5 II <0.5 II
<0.5 II <0.5 II
<0.5 II . <0.5 II
<0.5 II <0 5 u
<0.5 II <0.5 II
0.08 Jb <0.S u
<0.S u <o.s u
<0.5 u <0.5 II
<'" <1,011
0.4Jb 0.SjU
<0.5 II <0.5 II
<0.S u <o.5 u
<05 II 0.S U
0.2 Jb <OS u
<0.S u <0.5 II
<0.5 II <0.5 II
0.03 J <0.5 u
<0.5 u <0.5u
<I" <l.0 u
<0.5 u <0,5 II
2 of2
MW-06
MW-06 HHSSL
Normal Groundwater
4/2912003 JSA ~CA 2L
<0.5 II 200
<0.5 II 0.17
<O'" NS
<0.5 II 70-0
<0.5 u 7
<0 5 11 70
<0 5 11 350
<0.S 11 620
<0.5 II 0.38 • <0.S u 0.56
<0.5 II 350
<0.5 II "° <0.S 11 75
2 J 170
<3" 280
<3" NS
3 700
<0.5 u I
<0.5 II 06
<0.5 II 0.19
<0.S 11 NS
<0.5 u 700
<0.S u 0.3
0.06 J so
<0.5 u 2800
0.1 J 0.19
<0.S u 2.6
<0.5 II 70
<0 5 II 02
<0.5 II O<I
<0.5 II NS
0.07 Jb 1'00
<0.5 II 29
<0.5 II 0.44 • <I" 530
0.S jb ' <O.S u 530
<0.S 11 NS
0.8 0.7
0.l Jb 1000
<0.5 u 70
<0.5 11 0.2
0.03 J 28
<0.5 II 210-0
<I" NS
<0.5 u 0.015
• • SUMMARY OF SEMI-VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUND RES UL TS IN GROUND WATER SAMPLES
JOHNSON CONTROLS BATTERY GROUP, INC.
IA<•tlon Utnfifk•rlon MW-01
Flt" Snmplt Utnrl/fcfflon MW-01
S11mplt Typt Non1>1,I
Dalt C,ll«tU l/l91lOOI
Srm&-Volatlle OrJ:111le Compouadl (Jit/1)
2.2'-<nybil( l..:hk:,rolf'i-op111e
2.4.3,T ricblomphniol
2.4,6• Ttid1lomphcnol
2,4-Dithlomphcnol
l,4-T>in-..thyl ph<:nol
~-4-Dini1ropbtnol
?,4-Dinitrotoluaie
2,6-Dini1r0toluaoc
2-Chlo,onaphlhalcnc
2-ChlomphcDOl
2-Mt'lltylnaphlh.ale>c:
2-Mffll)'!phcnol 10-c, .. 01)
2-Nitroanilinc
2-Nill'OJlbcnol
J , l ' -Dichlorobenzidinc
3-Nitro,u,ilinc
4,6-0initro-2-m:lhylphalol
4.Brurmpbcnyl phenyl dhcf
4-Chloro-)-melhylpheno!
4•Chloroani!ino
4-Chlo!01)hmyl phenyl el.her
4-Motbylphmol (p•Crosoll
4.Niuo111iH110
4•NiUOpbcnol
Acmlpbllx:nc
Acm•phlhyltno
AllthrlCa,O
Bfflzo(a)m,lb-lCfflC
flr:ru:ol11pyrcne
lk:nm(b)Ouor;,,lhmc
BcmD(g.h.i~,rylcic
flc,zo(\ )lluoranthtnc
bis<2-<hLoo-o«hoxy)McUuuto
bi$(2-0lloroelhyl) l!O,cr (2-Cbloroetlryl EIM>
bls<l.cthyll=y\) Pbthala1c
Bci:eyl butyl ph1hala1c
C.ubazolc
Dibmz<a, h )amhracmo
Dib(ru:ofuran
Diethyl Pblhalate
Dimelhyl phlhalllo
Di-n•blltyl phlhalal<
Di-n«ty!phlhal110
Fluoranlhaic
Fl110tcne
Hn..chlorobcnzme
Hnac.hlor~lopcn!adicn•
Hcuchloroclhanc
lnda,o( 1,2,l-c,d)l'yra,e
llophorono
Naphthalc,c
Nil1'ob(ruenc
n-Niiroso-di-n-prapylanin•
11•Nitrotodiphenyla,rint
Pcntachlorophmol
Phenan1hreno
'"""' ,,,_
Notes
1. NS•N0Stmdardcs1abli1hcd
2. (!). lnlrlm "2L" Groonc:twater Standan:I.
3. Qualifiers are summMzed al end or secbon
ATFMrlLBL
N.\Jobsl20812S9JIGW Qwlity.dl (SVOC 1N WGJ
20SH93.01160101 MADI
7/161200)
""" """ ""'" ""'" ""'" <140u
""'" ""'" ""'" ""'" ""'" """ "'" ""'" <>;.
"'" "'" ""'. "''" "''" "''" "''. <>;.
"'"
II J
MW-01
MW-01
Nonnal
4/29/lOOJ
<10 II
<I Ou
<)Ou
<10 u
<10 II
<SO 11
<10 u
<\0 II
<I Ou
<10 II
<10 u
<10 u
""" <10 u
<10 u
"'". "'". <10 u
<10 u
<10u
<10 u
<]0 II
"'". "'"" <10 u
<10 11
<10u
<1011
<10 II
<10 u
<1011
<1011
<10 u
<!Ou
<10u
<10 u
<10 II
<1011
"10u
<10 11
<10 II
<]Ou
<10 II
<!Ou
<1011
<10 II
<10 II
<!0 II
"20u
<lOu
<1011
<10u
WINSTON SALEM, NORTH CAROLINA
PLANT AREA
MW-01
MW-DUP-01
Flrld Dap\leolr
4'19/1003
<10 u
<]0 u
<\011
<t0 u
<10 u
""" <LO u
<10 u
<JO u
<\Ou
<10 u
<JO u
"'". <I Ou
<\0 11
"'"" <C20u
<[Ou
<JO u
<]Q II
<\Ou
<10 u
"'". "'""
<JO II
<1011
<10 II
<1011
<\0 11
<10 u
<1011
<\0 11
<10 u
<JO u
<10u
<IQ II
<10 u
<1011
<1011
<IO 11
<10u
<1011
<10 u
<JO u
<]Ou
<tO u
<10 u
<]Ou
<\0 11
<LO II
<)0 II
<]Ou
<\Q II
"'". <LO 11
<1011
<10 u
MW-02
MW-tlJ
Normt.l
1/29/2001
<IOU
<]Ou
<10u
<10 u
<]Ou «•.
<IOu
<]Ou
<10u
<10u
<10 u
<]Ou
<19u
<I Ou
<19 II
<19u
<19u
<!Ou
<I Ou
<JOU
<1011
<10 u
<19u
<C]9u
<10u
<lOu
<[Ou
<!Ou
<IOU
<I Ou
<I Ou
<JQ II
<Cl Ou
<10u
<I Ou
<]Ou
<Cl Ou
<I Du
<10 u
<10 u
<I Ou
<10 II
<10 u
<Cl Ou
<lOu
<10 II
<lOu
<10 II
<10 u
<[Ou
<CIOu
<19u
<10 u
<]Ou
<!Ou
MW..(13
MW-OJ
Nonn•l
IIJ0/2001
<10 II
<10 u
<10 u
<10 u
<10 u
«h
<10 u
<10 u
<10 II
<LO 11
<10 11
<lOu
<19 II
<]Q II
<19 u
<19 II
<19 u
<10 II
<10 II
<10 II
<\0 II
<10u
<[9 II
<[9 II
<lO u
<1011
<10 u
<I Ou
<I Ou
<10 II
<10 II
<JOu
J.0J
<10 u
<!Ou
<10u
<10 u
<I Ou
<10u
<10 II
<I Ou
<!Ou
<10 u
<!Ou
<I Ou
<\Ou
<10 II
<IOU
<10u
<10 u
<10 II
<]Ou
<10u
<19 II
<10 u
<JOu
<10 u
MW-OJ
MW-DUP-01
Flold Dapllrur
1/J0/l00J
<10 11
<!Ou
<!Ou
<I Ou
<IO 11
""" <I Ou
<]0 11
<10u
<I Ou
<]0 11
<I Ou
"'"" <LOu
"'"" "'"" "'"" <1011
<C10u
<IOU
<I Ou
<]0 II
"'"" """" <10 u
<I Ou
<lOu
<IOU
<\Ou
<LOu
<I Ou
<10 u
2.0J
<!Ou
<]Ou
<[Ou
<IQ II
<10 II
<IOu
<!Ou
<JO u
<I Ou
<10 u
<10 II
<\Ou
<10 u
<10 u
<lOu
<10 u
<10 u
<10 u
<I Ou
"'"" <10 u
<1011
<10 u
MW-"
MW_..
Normal
1129/J00I
<9,0u
<9.0 u
<9,0 u
<9.0u
<9.0 II
4;,
<9.0u
"'"" "'". <9.0u
tjO,
<9.0 II
<19u
<9.0u
<19 u
<19u
<19 u
<9.0u
tj0o
tjO,
<9.0u
<9,0 u
<19u
<19u
<9.0 II
<9.0u
tj0o
tj".
<9,011
tjO,
tj".
<9,0u
tj0o
tj".
<9.0u
<9.0u
tjO,
<9.0u
<9,0u
<90u
<9,0 II
<9.011
<9,0 u
tj0.
<9.0u
<9.0 u
<9.0 u
tj "" tj0.
MW-OS
MW_,,
Nonna!
1130/J00I
<LO u
<10 u
<10u
<10 u
<10 u
""" <\Q II
<10 II
<10u
<\Ou
<IOa
<1011
"'"" <LO 11
"'"• "'"" """. ' <1011
<lOu
<10 u
<10 u
<10u
"'"" "'".
<\Ou
<10 11
<1011
<1011
<IOu
<JO u
<]Ou
<\011
<I Ou
<I Ou
<10u
<10 u
<10u
<10u
<10 11
<1011
<10u
<1011
<10u
<1011
<!Ou
<I Ou
<lOu
<10 u
<!Ou
<\Ou
<10 11
<!Ou
<1011
"'". <10 u
<!Ou
<10 11
MW_..
MW_..
Nonnll
1130/l00l
<9.0u
<9,0 11
tj".
<9.0 II
<9.0 II
«;,
<9.0u
<9.0 II
<90 u
tj0o
tj0.
<9,0 u
<1911
tj0o
<19 u
<l9u
<19u
tj0.
tj0,
<9.0u
tj0•
tj0o
<1911
<L9u
<9.0u
<9,011
tj0.
<9.011
<9.0u
tj".
<9.0u
<9.0 u
<9,0 u
<9.0u
tjO,
<9.0 u
tj".
<9.0 u
<9,0 u
tj0o
<9.0 u
<9.0 u
<9.0u
tj".
<9.0u
<9.0 u
<9,0 u
<9.0u
<9.0 u
<9,0 u
<9.0 u
<9.0 II
<9.0u
<9.0u
<]9 II
tj".
tj0.
<9,0 u
I of I
HII SSL
Groood,ntu
lMNCAlL
NS
NS
NS
NS
140
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
28
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
3.5
NS
NS
80(l)
210 (I)
210011)
o.os<11
0.0047 (I)
0.047(I)
210
0,47 (I)
NS
0.031
3
100
NS
5U1
0.0047 ilJ
28
5000
NS
700
140
280(I)
280
O.Q2
NS
NS
0.047(1)
36.8
21
NS
NS
NS
0.3
210
300
2101!1
SUMMARY OF ORGANO CHLORINE PESflCIDE AND PCB RESULTS IN GROUND WATER SAMPLES
JOHNSON CONTROLS BATTERY GROUP, INC.
Location ldtntificat/on MW-01
Fitld Samplt ldtntification MW-OJ
Samplt Typt Nonna!
Datt Cofltcttd tn9/200I
Pesticides (µg/1)
Aldrin <0.047 11
alpha Bhc (alpha Hexachlorocyclohexane) <0.047 U
alpha Endosulfan <0.094 u
alpha-Chlordane <0.094 u
beta BHC (beta Hexachlorocyclohexane) <0.094 11
beta Endosulfan <0.19 u
ODD ( I, I-bis( chlorop heny 1)-2,2-Di ch loroethane) <0.19 u
ODE ( I, I-bis( chlorophenyl)-2.2-Dichloroethenc) <0.094 u
DDT ( I ,l-bis{chlorophcnyl)-2,2,2-TrichJorocthane) <0.28 u
delta BHC (delta Hexachlorocyclohcxane) <0.047 u
Dieldrin <0.094 u
Endosulfan sulfate <O.J9u
Endrin <0.19 u
Endrin aldehyde <0.19 u
Endrin ketone <0.47 u
gamma BHC (Lindane) <0.047 U
gamma-Chlordane 0.015jJ
Heptachlor <0.047 11
Heptachlor epoxide <0.047 u
Methoxych\or <0.47 u
Toxaphene <4.7 II
PCBs (µ.g/1)
PCB-1016 (Arochlor 1016) <0.94 u
PCB-1221 (Arochlor 1221) <1.9 u
PCB-1232 (Arochlor 1232) <0.9411
PCB-1242 (Arochlor 1242) <0.94 u
PCB-1248 (Arochlor 1248) <0.94 u
PCB-1254 (Arochlor 1254) <0.94 u
PCB-1260 (Arochlor 1260) <0.94 II
Notes:
I. NS= No Standard established
2. (b) Value is for total endrin (endrink endrin aldehyde, and endrin ketone).
3. (e) Interim (I) standard for hexachlorocyclohexane isomers.
4. Qualifiers summarized at end of section.
ATF/vlr/LBL
N:\Jobs\208\2593\GW Quality.xis (PST IN WO)
2082593.0J 160101 MADI
7/1612003
WINSfON SALEM, NORTH CAROLINA
PLANT AREA
MW-01 MW-02 !\IW-02
MW-0t MW-02 MW-02
Normal Normal Normal
4/29/2003 1/29/2001 4/30/2003
<0.05 u <0.047 U <0.05 u
<0.05 U <0.047 11 <0.05 U
<0.1 u <0.094 u <0.1 u
<0.l u 0.027 jpU <0.J II
<0.1 u <0.094 u <0.1 u
<0.2 u <0.19 u <0.2 u
<0.2 11 <0.19 u <0.2 u
<0.1 u <0.094 u <0.1 u
<0.3 u <0.28 11 <0.3 II
<0.05 u <0.047 u <0.05 u
<0.1 u <0.094 u <O.J 11
<0.2 u <0.19 11 <0.2 u
<0.2 u <0.19 u <0.2 II
<0.2u <0.19 II <0.2 II
<0.5u <0.47 u <0.5 u
<0.05 u <0.047 u <0.05 ll
<0.05 u <0.047 II <0.05 11
<0.05 u <0.047 11 <0,05 II
<0.05 11 <0.047 11 <0.05 u
<0.5 11 <0.47 u <0.5 u
<S, <4.7 u <S,
NS <0.94 u NS
NS <1.9 u NS
NS <0.9411 NS
NS <0.94 u NS
NS <0.9411 NS
NS <0.94 u NS
NS <0.94 II NS
MW-03 MW-03
MW-03 MW-03
Normal Normal
1/l0n00I 4/30/2003
<0.048 U <0.05 U
<0.048 11 <0.05 U
<0.095 u <0.1 u
0.043 jpU <0.1 u
0.058 jpJ <0.111
<0.19 u <0.2 II
<0.19 u <0.2 u
<0.095 u <0.1 u
<0.28 11 <0.3 u
<0.048 u <0.05 u
<0.095 11 <0.1 u
<0.19 u <0.2 II
<0.19 u <0.2 II
<0.19u <0.2 u
<0.48u <0.S u
<0.048 u <0.05 u
0.051 pJ <0.05 II
<0.048 11 <0.05 u
0.032 jpJ <0.05 11
<0.4811 <0.5 u
<4.8 u <S,
<0.95 11 NS
<J.9u NS
<0,95 II NS
<0.95 u NS
<0.95 u NS
<0.95 u NS
<0.95 11 NS
l of2
MW-03 MW-03
MW-DUP-01 MW-DUP-01 HH SSL
Field Duplicate Fldd Duplicate Groundwater
1/30/2001 4/29/2003 15A NCA2L
<0.046 u <0.05 U NS
<0.046 U <0.05 U 0.OJ9(e) • <0.093 11 <0.1 u NS
<0.093 u <0.1 u 0.027
<0.093 u <0.1 u 0.019 (e)
<0.19 11 <0.2 u 42
<0.19 u <0.2 u 0.14
<0.093 u <0.1 u NS
<0.28 u <0.3 u 0.1
<0.046 u <0.05 u 0.019 (e)
<0.093 u <0.1 u 0.002
<0.19 u <0.2 u NS
<0.19 II <0.2 II 2.1 (b)
<0.19 u <0.2 u 2.1 (b)
<0.46 u <0.5 u 2.1 (b)
<0.046 11 <0.05 u 0.2
<0.046 II <0.05 u 0.027
<0.046 u <0.05 11 0.008
<0.046 11 <0.05 u 0.004
<0.46 u <O.S u JS
<4.6u <S, 0.03
<0.93 11 NS NS
<1.9 u NS NS • <0.93 II NS NS
<0.93 u NS NS
<0.93 u NS NS
<0.93 II NS NS
<0.93 II NS NS
SUMMARY OF ORGANO CHLORINE PESTICIDE AND PCB RESULTS IN GROUND WATER SAMPLES
JOHNSON CONTROLS BATTERY GROUP, INC.
Location Identification
Field Sample Identification
Sample Type
Date Collected
Pesticides (pg/I)
Aldrin
alpha Bhc (alpha Hcxachlorocyclohe){ane)
alpha Endos11lfan
alpha-Chlordl.!le
beta BHC (beta Hcxachlorocyclohe){ane)
beta Endosulfan
DDD (I, l-bis(chlorophenyl)-2,2-Dichloroethane)
DOE (I, 1-bis(chlorophenyl)-2,2-Dichloroethene)
DDT ( l , 1-bis( chlorophenyl)-2,2,2-Trichlorocthane)
delta BHC (delta He){achlorocyclohexane)
Dicldrin
Endosu\fan sulfate
Endrin
Endrin aldehyde
Endrin ketone
gamma BHC (Lindane)
gamma-Chlordane
Heptachlor
Heptachlor epo){ide
Metho:xych\or
Toxaphene
PCBs (pg/I)
PCB-1016(Arochlor 1016)
PCB-1221 (Arochlor 1221)
PCB-I 232 (Arochlor 1232)
PCB-1242 (Arochlor 1242)
PCB-1248 (Arochlor 1248)
PCB-1254 (Aroch\or 1254)
PCB-1260 (Arochlor 1260)
Notes:
I. NS= No Standard established
2. (b) Value is for total endrin (endrink endrin aldehyde, and endrin ke1
3. (e) Interim (I) standard for hexachlorocyclohexanc isomers.
4. Qualifiers summarized at end of section.
ATF/vlr/LBL
N:\Jobs\20812593\GW Quality.xis (PST [N WG)
2082593.0i !60101 MADI
7/16/2003
WINSTON SALEM, NORTH CAROLINA
PLANT AREA
l\lW-04 MW-04 MW-OS
MW-04 MW-04 MW-05
Normal Normal Normal
1nw2001 4/29/2003 1/30/2001
0.0J8j <0.05 u 0.14 p
<0.048 11 <0.05 II <0.051 II
<0.095 II <0.J 11 0.036 jp
<0.095 11 <0.! 11 0.056jpU
<0.095 11 <0.I u <Q,[ II
<0.\9u <0.2 u <0.2 u
0.19jpJ <0.2 11 <0.2 11
<0.095 u <0.\ II <0.\ II
<0.28 II <0.3 u <0.31 II
<0.048 II <0.05 II 0.03Ijp
<0.095 II <0.J II <0.] II
<0.19 11 <0.2 II <0.2 u
<0.19 II <0.2 II <0.2 II
<0.1911 <0.2 II <0.2 II
<0.48 u <0.5 11 0.031 j
<0.048 u <0.05 II <0.051 u
<0.048 II <0.05 II <0.051 u
<0.048 II <0.05 II <0,051 II
O.OIJjp <0.05 u <0.051 11
<0.48 II <0.5 11 <0.5\ II
<4.8 II <5" <5.J u
<0.95 II NS <I.Ou
<\.911 NS <2.0 II
<0.95 II NS <I.Ou
<0.95 II NS <I.Ou
<0.95 U NS <\.Ou
<0.95 II NS <1.0 II
<0.95 II NS <I.Ou
MW-OS MW-06
MW-OS MW-06
Normal Normal
4/29/2003 1/30/2001
<0.05 11 0.035 jp
<0.05 11 <0.047 11
<0.\ 11 0.02Sj
<0.J u 0.053 jpU
<0.1 u <0.094 II
<0.2 11 <0.1911
<0.2 u <0.!9 II
<0.\ u <0.094 u
<0.3 u <0.28 11
<0.05 u <0.047 II
<Q.J II <0.094 II
<0.2 u <0.\9 II
<0.2 II <0.19 II
<0.2 11 <0.1911
<0.5 u <0.47 II
<0.05 II <0.047 II
<0.05 11 <0.047 II
<0.05 II <0.047 11
<0.05 11 <0.047 u
<0.5 u <0.47 u
<5" <4.7 u
NS <0.94 u
NS <1.9 II
NS <0.94 u
NS <0.94 II
NS <0.94 II
NS <0,94 II
NS <0.94 U
2 of2
MW-06
MW-06 HHSSL
Normal Groundwater
4/29/2003 ISA NCA 2L
<0.05 11 NS
<0.05 11 0.019(e)
<0.111 NS
<0.111 0.027 • <0.111 0.019 (e)
<0.2 u 42
<0.2 11 0.14
<0.111 NS
<0.3 II 0.1
0.078 p O.Ol9(c)
<0.\ 11 0.002
<0.2 II NS
<0.2 u 2.1 (b)
<0.2 II 2.1 (b)
<0.5 11 2.1 (b)
<0,05 II 0.2
<0.05 II 0.027
0.13 0.008
<0,05 u 0.004
<0.5 u JS
<5" 0.03
NS NS
NS NS
NS NS • NS NS
NS NS
NS NS
NS NS
• •
INORGANIC DATA QUALIF1ERS
u -laboratory qualifier indicates the analyte is not detected at the reporting limit
n -laboratory qualifier indicates sample spike recovery is outside control limits
b -laboratory qualifier indicates the reported value is less than the reporting limit but
greater than the instrument detection limit
e -laboratory qualifier indicates the serial dilution result was not within 10% of the
undiluted result
* .,. .laboratory: qualifier indicates -the sample and sample duplicate results are outside
control limits
. J .,.._ data validation qualifier indicates. the value is estimated due to spike recovery, serial
dilution, and/or initial and/or continuing calibration outside quality control limits·
-R -· data validation qualifier indicates the value was. not detected and is unusable due to
spike and/or initial calibration criteria outside criiepa · ··
U -data validation qualifier indicates the value was not detected due to the analyte being
.. detected at a similar concentration in an associated blank
---indicates the parameter was not analyzed
ORGANIC DATA QUALIFlERS
··' .. . . ' .
u -laboratory qualifier indicates the analytc is not detected at the reporting limit
j ""' laboratory qualifier indicates the reported. value is less than the reporting limit but
greater than the instrument detection limit
p -laboratory qualifier i~dicates the_ value for the pcsucide or PCB c01ppound has greater··
. than 25% relative pel'CCnt difference between the values detected on the primary and
confirmation columns
< -laboratory qualifier indicates the analyte is not detected at the reporting limit
J -data validation qualifier indicates the value is estimated due to spike recovery, surrogate
recovery, laboratory control sample, and/or initial and/or continuing calibration outside
quality control limits
R -data validation qualifier indicates the value was not detected and is unusable due to
spike, surrogate, laboratory control sample, and/or initial calibration criteria outside
criteria
U -data validation qualifier indicates the value was not detected due to the analytc being
detected at a similar concentration in an associated blank
MW-02 881.87
MW-03 889.97
MW-04 902.28
MW-05 914.06
MW-06 910.77
SG-01 865.45
SG-02 835.41
SG-03 818.77
SG-04 803.16
NM = Not measured
A TF\atf\LBL
N:Vobs\208\2593\01\Water Levels.:itls]
2082593.01160 IO I -MAD I
34.22
28.63
24.88
38.08
29.23
NM
NM
NM
NM
Summary of Water Level Elevations
Johnson Controls Battery Group, Inc.
Winston-Salem, North Carolina
847.65 34.22 847.65
861.34 27.78 862.19
877.40 24.49 877.79
875.98 37.66 876.40
881.54 29.27 881.50
34. 18
27.93
24.68
37.6
29.35
NM NM NM ~5'i,~•• :;{~,;:; 0-:/ r. 65
NM NM NM 0.62
NM NM NM 0.8
NM NM NM 1.16
Page I of I
•
847.69 30.13 851.74
862.04 26.79 863.18
877.60 23.71 878.57
876.46 37 877.06
881.42 28.62 882. 15
;E :::863~77~~; NM NM
832.70 NM NM
816.24 NM NM
800.99 NM NM •
North Carolina A
Department of Environment an"'atural Resources
Division of Waste Management
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
Dexter R. Matthews, Interim Director
Mr. Luis Flores
Remedial Project Manager
US EPA Region IV
61 Forsyth Street, I Ith Floor
Atlanta, Georgia 3 03 03
July 3, 2003
RE: Comments on the Draft Groundwater Sampling Results
Johnson Controls Battery Group, Inc. (JCBG)
NCO 000 770 487
Winston Salem, Forsyth County, North Carolina
Dear Mr. Flores:
The State received an electronic letter of the Draft Groundwater Sampling Results,
dated 17 June 2003, for the Johnson Controls Battery Facility, located in Walkertown near
Winston-Salem, NC. The following comments by the North Carolina Superfund Section are
submitted for your consideration.
General Comment
The NC Superfund Section would agree that the site is not an important source of metals or
pesticides to the groundwater. The facility groundwater is not badly contaminated with any
contaminants. However, those that exist above NC Groundwater Standards must be shown to
be background or continued monitoring would be required to assure that they are decreasing
in concentration and do not leave the facility property and especially that they do not impact
other downgradient receptors. An upgradient monitoring well needs to be provided in a
undisturbed location of the property or on an upgradient adjacent property in order to
properly confirm background concentrations.
Specific Comments:
I. The First paragraph on page I of the Groundwater Sampling Results does not include
SVOC's as agreed at monitoring well MW-I. Monitoring well MW-01 should include
analysis for SVOCs since it contained bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate in the first round
results. This was a comment the state made on the Draft Sampling Work Plan dated
I 646 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1646
Phone: [phone] \ FAX: [phone] \ Internet: www.enr.state.nc.us
AN EQUAL OPPORllJNITY \ AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER-50% RECYCLED/ 10% POST CONSUMER PAPER
Mr. Luis Flores
4-22-2003
Page 2 of3
• •
March 21, 2003. I had further discussions of this issue by telephone with Dan Hall with
Montgomery Watson Harza. The States comment letter on the Work Plan was dated
April 22, 2003.
On Tuesday 29 April 2003, I witnessed Trevor Banister and Dale Lane with Montgomery
Watson Harza complete groundwater sampling of monitoring well MW-I. I discussed the
issue of SVOC samples with Mr. Banister who was aware of the different protocol for
monitoring well MW-I and was prepared to sample for SVOCs at this well. During
sampling overview the sampling included appropriate bottles and samples for SVOCs.
The Paragraph under B. Water Quality Analyses on page 2 states that "the sample from
well MW-01 was analyzed for SVOCs (Method 8270C)." This statement on page 2
should also be clarified with emphasis in the first paragraph on page I for consistency.
This sample data is a critical part of the verification that monitoring well MW-I is not
contaminated with SVOCs.
2. As noted in the Tables on page 2 and 3 the metals iron and manganese were detected in
monitoring wells MW-I, MW-5, and MW-6 at concentrations significantly above the
NCAC 2L Groundwater Standards. Proper monitoring of these wells will be required to
confirm that these concentrations are decreasing and are contained on the property or are
consistent with local background metals concentrations. Additional monitoring wells
would be required in either up gradient and downgradient areas of the site to confirm that
these metals are either background or are contained on site.
3. The third paragraph on page 3 states that "Iron and manganese are generally ubiquitous in
the environment and likely do not represent Site-derived contamination." Facilities that
use acids and Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) and have documented spills of these
compounds commonly have high concentrations of metals such as iron and manganese
resulting from leaching of the naturally occurring metals due to the changes in grondwater
chemistry. Therefore, proper documentation of background metals will be required in
order to confirm that they are naturally occurring in groundwater at these high
concentrations.
The presence of high levels of iron and manganese concentrations that exceed 2 times
background, in an aquifer, should be considered at a minimum in the monitoring program
for the site. In this manner we can assure that these high metals concentrations do not
impact receptors. If the high metals concentrations are the result of the high VOC
concentrations or spilled acids we expect that the metals concentrations will reduce to
background as the pH neutralizes.
If these metals concentrations are contained on the Johnson Controls Battery Group
property, the simplest way to deal with the issue is to deed restrict the use of groundwater
and set up an acceptable groundwater-monitoring schedule for the downgradient wells. In
this way we can confirm that the metals contaminants are decreasing and that they do not
leave the property.
Mr. Luis Flores
4-22-2003
Page 3 of3
• •
4. As you stated in the report, the pesticides detected in monitoring well MW-06 may or may
not be site related. Since heptachlor is much more toxic and at 2 orders of magnitude
greater than the NC 2L Groundwater Standard it would worth the effort to resample this
well for pesticides to confirm their presence or absence. The pesticides must be shown to
be similar to background or additional monitoring for pesticides will be required in
monitoring well MW-6. The Delta BHC compound is not very toxic and only slightly
exceeds the standard but the heptachlor is very toxic to humans and it should be
documented that the contaminant is not present above State groundwater Standards.
The State appreciates the opportunity to comment on this document and we look forward to
working with you on the project. If you have any questions or comments, please call me, at
(9 I 9) 733-280 I, extension 341 or email at randy.mcelveen@ncmail._n.~!-
cc: Dave Lown, N.C. Superfund Section
Sincerely,
Randy McElveen
Environmental Engineer
NC Superfund Section
({ID MWH
June 17, 2003
Mr. Luis Flores
•
Remedial Project Manager
USEPA Region IV
6 I Forsyth Street, I I th Floor
Atlanta, Georgia 30303
Re: Groundwater Sampling Results
April 29, 2003
Winston-Salem Facility
Dear Luis:
•
DRAFT
MWH Americas, Inc. (MWH) completed the second round of groundwater monitoring at the
JCBGI Winston-Salem facility on April 29, 2003.
The groundwater sampling confinnation round includes analysis of metals, volatile organic
compounds, and pesticides in groundwater. Semi-volatiles and PCBs were explicitly excluded
from the list of analytes, based on the first round of sampling results reviewed from the EE/CA
investigation. The Quality Assurance Project Plan (QAPP) and Field Sampling Plan (FSP)
previously developed for the EE/CA guided this second round of confinnation groundwater
sampling and analysis.
A. Groundwater Sampling Methods
The field technicians sampled each of the 6 monitoring wells (MW-0 I through MW-06)
using low-flow purge sampling techniques to obtain representative groundwater samples.
Prior to groundwater sampling, each monitoring well was purged. A clean plastic drop
cloth was spread around the well prior lo purging. Purging was accomplished by removing
groundwater from the monitoring wells using a decontaminated, low-flow submersible
pump with new dedicated polyethylene discharge tubing. Purging continued until water
quality parameters, including pH, temperature, redox, conductivity, and turbidity, stabilized
and a minimum of 3 and maximum of 5 well volumes were removed or the well was
pumped dry. Purge water was containerized in 55-gallon drums.
Once the wells were properly purged, groundwater samples were collected. The
groundwater samples for total metals analyses were collected directly from the
polyethylene tubing. The groundwater sample for dissolved metals analyses were field
filtered using a 0.45-micron inline filter with the polyethylene tubing and discharged into
the sample containers. The groundwater samples for VOCs and organochlorine pesticides
analyses were collected using a new, clean Teflon® bailer. Groundwater samples were
placed in appropriate sample containers, preserved, properly labeled, and stored on ice.
Chain of custody procedures were followed for collection and shipping the samples.
Field quality control (QC) samples were collected to assess the quality of the analytical
data and to evaluate sampling and analytical reproducibility (precision). Field quality
control samples consisted of one each of a duplicate sample, field blank, matrix spike/
matrix spike duplicate, and trip blank. Each QC sample was analyzed for all scheduled
parameters, except the trip blank, which was analyzed for VOCs, only.
One Science Cour1
PO Box 5385
Madison, Wisconsin
<;'l7(\<;J\1Q<;
Tel· 608 231 4747
Filx 608/.314777
Delivering lnnov,1/ive Projecls and S0/11/ions Worl!lwrde
• •
The groundwater level and total depth of each monitoring well were measured using an
electronic water-level indicator to an accuracy of 0.0 I feet prior to purging the well. The
water-level indicator was rinsed with deionized water prior to each use. The depth to
groundwater was recorded in the field logbook and the well volume was calculated.
Liquids from the decontamination of sampling equipment and sample purge water were
contained in 55-gal drums for later disposal or treatment by facility management.
B. Water Quality Analyses
Each of the six groundwater samples and QC samples were analyzed for the following
parameters:
Total T AL Metals
Dissolved TAL Metals voes
Organochlorine
pesticides
3005A/6010B/7470A
3005A/60 I 0B/7470A
5030B/8260B
8081
In addition, the sample from well MW-0 I was analyzed for SVOCs (Method 8270C). The
samples that were field filtered (FF) represent the Dissolved T AL Metals results.
CompuChem Laboratories of Research Triangle Park, NC conducted the analyses of the
groundwater samples.
C. Water Quality Results
The groundwater analytical results are presented in the attached Tables I through 4. The
April 29, 2003 data is presented adjacent to the January 29/30, 2001 data previously
submitted. Data qualifiers presented with the results are summarized and presented
following the tables. The following is a brief discussion of each class of parameters.
I. Metals
The following two tables present the minimum, mean, and maximum concentrations of
total and dissolved select metals, along with the number of detections from the six
groundwater monitoring wells. Please note that, the minimum value is the minimum
detected value (not non-detect, unless no detections were noted in any samples). The mean
is calculated from samples with detected concentrations. Further, QA duplicate samples
are not included within the number of detections. The tables below also identify the 15A
NCA 2L groundwater standards and the monitoring well locations where standards are
exceeded.
Total Select TAL Metals in Groundwater
Parameter Minimum Mean
/uo/L\ • luo/L\
Aluminum 49.7 369.2
Cadmium ND ND
Conner 4.3 4.3
Iron 80.4 726.i
Lead 4.9 4.9
Mane:ancse 16.5 211.3
Nickel 3.5 5.6
Total ND ND
Mercurv
Zinc 10.2 21.2
•sample locat1ons: MW0I-MW06
Mr Luis Flores
No. of ISANCA
Maximum Detections 2L
luo/L\ • GW Stds .
1550 5 NS
ND 0 1.8
4.3 I 1000
2320 4 300
4.9 I 15
996 6 50
7.1 3 100
ND 0 I.I
36.6 5 1050
June 17 2003
Wells Exceeding Std.
MW0I MW06
MW0J. MW05. MW06
USEPA Regions IV
• •
Dissolved Select TAL Metals in Groundwater
No. of ISANCA Wells Exceeding Std.
Parameter Minimum, Mean Maximum Detections 2L
'lu•/1,l ful!/Ll (uon .\ • GW Stds .
Aluminum ND ND ND 0 NS
Cadmium ND ND ND 0 1.8
Conner ND ND ND 0 1000
Iron 52.9 312.0 571 2 300 MW06
Lead ND ND ND 0 15
Manl!ancse 15.6 541.5 3060 6 50 MW0I. MW05. MW06
Nickel 1.4 1.9 2.7 2 100
Total 0.13 0.13 0.13 I I.I
Mcrcurv
Zinc 19.1 21.9 27, I 3 1050
•sample locat1ons: MW0I-MW06
Based on the information presented in the tables above, only total manganese was detected
in all 6 groundwater samples above the reporting limits. In contrast, total lead was detected
in only one sample (MW-01, 4.9 ug/L). Total aluminum and total iron were detected in 5
and 4 samples, respectively. Concentration ranges and mean values of total metals from
the April 2003 sampling are comparable to the January 2001 sampling, except that 5
samples had total aluminum above detection limits in the current sampling, as compared to
only one in the previous sampling.
As expected, the number of detections of dissolved metals from filtered samples is
generally less than the total metals detections. The exception is at well MW06, where
several metals were higher in the filtered sample than the total samples. The manganese
concentration was high enough in the filtered sample for MW06, that it skews the mean
value of the filtered' samples. Similar to the total metals, only manganese was detected in
all 6 filtered groundwater samples. Lead was not detected in any of the filtered samples.
Aluminum was apparently filtered out of the samples, since none was detected. Maximum
iron and manganese concentrations are higher in the April 2003 sampling than the January
2001 sampling.
Groundwater standards were exceeded only for iron (in upgradient wells MW0 I and
MW06) and manganese (in wells MW0l, MW05, and MW06) in the total metal analyses.
Similarly, standards were exceeded in the dissolved metal analyses for iron (in well
MW06) and manganese (in wells MW0l, MW05, and MW06). Iron and manganese are
generally ubiquitous in the environment and likely do not represent Site-derived
contamination. No other total or dissolved metals analyzed beyond the select metals
exceeded a groundwater standard.
The data confirm the site is not an important source of metals to the groundwater. The iron
and manganese concentrations are naturally occurring and are not considered Site-derived
contamination.
2. SVOCs
No SYOCs were detected in the April 2003 groundwater sample from MW0 1.
Mr, Luis Flores June 17. 2003 USEPA Regions IV
P.:iuP 1
• •
3. voes
The table below presents the list of voes detected in groundwater monitoring at the site,
the list of voes detected in April 2003 groundwater monitor, the I SA NeA 2L
groundwater standards, and the wells which exceeded the standard:
April 2003
Parameter Detections
# of Samn\cs 6 I I l
1.1.2.2 Tetrachlorocthanc 0
1.2.4 Trichlorobenzenc 0
1,2,4 Trimcthvlbcnzene MW0I, MW05
I 2-Dichlorobenzcne 0
I 3 5-Trimcthvlbcnzenc MW05
I 3-Dichlorobenzene 0
I 4-Dichlorobenzene 0
2-Butanone MW0I MW05 MW06
2-Hcxanone 0
Acetone MW0\, MW02, MW03,
MW04. MW05. MW06
Benzene MW0I, MW04,
MW03 Dun
Chlorobenzene MW04. MW05. MW06
Bromodichloromcth:ine 0
Carbon Disulfide 0
Chiorofonn MW0I, MW02, MW03,
MW04 MW05 MW06
Chloromethane 0
Cis-1 3-Dichloroorooenc 0
Dibromochloromethane 0
Methylene Chloride MW0I, MW02, MW03,
MW04. MW05. MW06
m&n Xvlcnes MW0\
o-Xvlene 0
Stvrenc 0
T etrachlorocthvicne 0
Toluene MW0I, MW02, MW03,
MW04. MW05 MW06
Trans-1.3-Dichlorooroncnc 0
Trichioroethylene MW0I, MW04, MW05,
MW06
(I) Sampling Locations: MW0I through MW06.
(2) Value is for total xylenes m, p & o
ISA NCA 2L Wells
GW Stds. Exceedine Std.
50
70
350
620
350
620
75
170
280
700
I
50
0.6
700
0.19 MW02, MW03,
MW04.MW05
2.6
0.2
0.41
5
530 (2)
530 /2)
NS
0.7
1000
0.2
2.8
Groundwater data indicates the presence of several voes detected at very low levels in site
monitoring wells. Several of these additional voes are apparently petroleum related
(benzenes, xylenes, toluene) and others are chlorinated or propenated compounds. The
April 2003 monitoring detected very minor amounts of 2-butanone, chlorobenzene, and
trichloroethylene, which were not detected in the January 200 I sampling. In contrast,
several compounds detected in the January 200 I sampling were not detected in the April
2003 results from any of the wells. In particular, background well MW0 I had nine
compounds detected in the current sampling compared to 16 compounds in the previous
sampling.
Mr. Luis Flores June 17 2003 LJSEPA Regions IV
p~.,,,. d
• •
1,/J'L I\L~l
Some compounds were detected in all 6 monitoring wells, including acetone, chloroform, 1_.,,,-c; ,.,.J
methylene chloride, and toluene, and appear to be present in both upgradient wells (MW0I,~ b<~f.~"'
MW04, MW06) and downgradient wells (MW02, MW03, and MW05). Several VOCs VJ<..,.'{,,(
(methylene chloride, toluene, xylenes, dichlorodifluoromethane) were detected at low '
levels in the laboratory blanks, and their results are qualified on the summary table. Most
other compounds were detected in a combination of upgradient and downgradient wells.
Acetone and methylene chloride was detected in other media from sampling conducted
during the EE/CA, but these constituents are often considered laboratory contaminants.
Neither toluene nor chloroform was detected in other media than groundwater from the
EE/CA. Nearly all of the VOC values were reported as estimated, because the values were
lower than the reporting limit but higher than the detection, with the exception of some
acetone and chloroform results.
Only chloroform exceeded a 15A NCA 2L groundwater standard of all the VOC
detections. Chloroform concentrations barely exceeded the standard (0.19 ug/L) in 4 of
the 6 groundwater samples in which it was detected, ranging from 0.2 ug/L to 0.3 ug/L.
All 4 samples where exceedances occurred were qualified as estimated values by the
laboratory. Chloroform is a trihalomethane, often associated with drinking water
treatment.
These VOC data confirm previous results that the Site is not an important source of VOCs
to the groundwater.
4. Pesticides
The table below presents the list of pesticides detected in groundwater monitoring at the
site, the list of pesticides detected in April 2003 groundwater monitor, the 15A NCA 2L
groundwater standards, and the wells which exceeded the standard:
Parameter/Location Pesticide ISANCA 2L Wells Exceeding
Media Detections GW Stds. Std.
# of Samoles 6
Sample Locations MW0 I through
MW06
Aldrin 0 NS
Alnha BHC 0 0.019 (I)
Aloha Endosulfan 0 NS
Aloha Chlordane 0 0.027
Beta BHC 0 0.019/ll
DDD 0 0.14
Delta BHC MW06 0.01911) MW06
Endrin ketone 0 2.1
Gamma Chlordane 0 0.027
Heotachlor MW06 0,008 MW06
Heotachlor Exooxide 0 0.004
(I) Value 1s for total BHC
Two pesticide compounds were detected in the groundwater sample from well MW06 in
the April 2003 groundwater monitoring compared to IO compounds detected in up to 4
wells in the January 200 I monitoring. Only minor concentrations of delta BHC (0.078
ug/L) and Heptachlor (0.13 ug/L) were detected, both in upgradient well MW06 in April
2003. Both of these compounds exceeded their respective 15A NCA 2L groundwater
standard. Heptachlor had not been detected in the January 200 I results. Well MW06 is
considered an upgradient well, so these compounds may not be Site-related. Further, no
pesticides were detected in downgradient wells at the Site.
Mr. Luis Flores June 17 2003 USEPA Regions IV
• •
Overall, these pesticide results present an improvement in water quality since the January
2001 monitoring. The data confirm that the Site is not an important source of pesticides to
the groundwater.
D. Groundwater Flow
I. Water Levels.
A summary of water level measurements from the monitoring wells and staff gages is
presented in the attached table. The depth to groundwater on April 29, 2003 ranged from
approximately 24 ft (MW04) to 37 ft (MW05) below land surface. Groundwater elevations
on April 29, 2003 ranged from 882.15 ft ms! at well MW06, at the southeast comer of the
Facility building, to 851.74 ft ms! at well MW02, located downgradient from the north end
of the Facility building. The depths to water measured at each well are consistent with data
collected in 200 l.
2. Groundwater Flow
Similar to the previous interpretation of groundwater elevations (EE/CA Figure 5), groundwater
flows from the topographically high area around the Facility toward the west and northwest, in the
direction of Lowery Mill Creek. The topographically high area around the Facility is likely a local
groundwater recharge area, while the wetlands and Lowery Mill Creek are the groundwater
discharge areas.
E. Conclusions
Based on the results of the April 2003 groundwater monitoring, the following conclusions
are drawn:
• Lead was only detected in one groundwater sample, and its concentration was
below the 15A NCA 2L groundwater standard. Groundwater standards were
exceeded only for iron and manganese in the total and dissolved metal analyses.
Iron and manganese are generally ubiquitous in the environment and likely do not
represent Site-derived contamination. ·
• No SVOes were detected in groundwater.
• Groundwater data indicates the presence of several voes detected at very low
levels, in site monitoring wells. Only chloroform exceeded a 15A NeA 2L
groundwater standard of the voe detections. The four samples where exceedances
occurred were qualified as estimated values by the laboratory.
• Only two pesticide compounds were detected in one upgradient well, but both
exceeded groundwater standards. Ten compounds were detected in up to 4 wells in
the January 200 I monitoring, so these current results present an improvement in
water quality. Pesticides may not be Site related.
Mr, Luis Flores June 17, 2003 USEPA Regions IV
• •
These results
groundwater.
necessary.
indicate that the Site is not an important source of contaminants to · the
Therefore, we recommend that no further groundwater monitoring is
If you have any questions about this infonnation, please contact the undersigned.
Sincerely,
MWH Americas, Inc.
Daniel W. Hall, PG
Project Manager
Enclosure: Summary Tables of Groundwater Analytical Data
Summary of Water Table Elevations
cc: Timothy J. Lafond, JCBGI
Randy McElveen, NCDENR
DWH/pjs/LBL
N:\Jobs\208\2593\WSGW Monitoringrcsuhs.doc
2082593.01160101-MADI
Mr. Luis Flores June 17 2003
P<ltJP 7
LJSEPA Regions IV
Loclllion ld,ntijfration MW-01
Fi,ld Sample Identification MW-01
Sampl, T;pe Normal
Date Collected 1129nOOI
Find Lab Metals (1,1-g/l)
Aluminum 299"
Antimony <3.S u
Arsenic <3.9 un
Barium 44,4 eJ
Beryllium <0.2 u
Cadmium <0.4 u
Calcium 2340 *
Chromium. Total 4.6 b
Cobalt 4.9 b
Copper 6.3 U
lroo 527 *aJ
L~d 12.9
Magnci;ium 1180
ManganeM: 747"
Mercury <0.1 u
Nickel 7.9
Potassium 2270 •
Sclrnium <3.9 unR
Silver <0.8 u
Sodium 3570 eJ
Thallium <5.1 un
Vanadium 1.2 b
Zinc JU
Notes:
I. NS= No Standard established
2. (FF)• Field filtcrcd.
3. Qualifier.; summ3rized at end of section.
A TF/vlr/LBL
N:\JobsU08U5931GW Quality.,h (FIXED METALS IN WG)
2082593.01160101 MADI
6/17n003
MW-01
MW-01
l"ormal
4/29/2003
1550
<10 u
<10 u
68.4 e
0.16 b
<5'
551 be
9.7 ..
4.3 b
2320
,.9
1040 e
130 e
<0.2 u
7.1
2410
<5'
<5"
1220 b
<!Ou
6.6 b
36.6 *
MW-01 (FF)
MW.OJ
Normal
1/29/2001
<13.8 u
<J.5 u
<3.9u
.l4
<0.2 u
<0.4 u
2140
<0.9 u
4.0 b
5.7 U
<9.8 u
SJ
1050
653
<0.1 u
4.8 bU
1960
<3.9 un
<0.8 un
2500 eJ
7.0bU
<0.5 u
23
SU!'>l!\1ARY OF FIXED !\.IETALS
RES UL TS l:'I,' GROU:-.'D WATER SA!'>IPLES
JOH:-.'SON CO:-.'TROLS BATTERY GROUP, 1:-.'C.
Wl:-.'STO:"i SALDI, !',ORTII CAROLl:-.'A
PLA:,,;T AREA
MW-01 (FF) MW-02 MW--02
MW-01 MW-02 MW-02
Normal Normal Normal
4/29/2003 1/29/2001 4/30/2003
<IOOu 383" 23.2 b
<!Ou <3.5 u <!Ou
<IO u <3.9 un <!Ou
41.9 e 46.5 eJ 52.3 e
<5' <0.2 u 0.47 b
<5' <0.4 u <5'
439 b 4320 * 2760 e
<5' 11.6 1.3 b
2.3 b 2.6 b <5'
<5" 4.5 bU <5"
<100 u S67 "nJ <\OOu
<3' ,., <3"
5116 b 894 b 716 be
64.8 e 112" 16.8 e
<0.2 u <0.1 u <0.2 u
1.7 b 17.11 <5"
1830 1750" 1600
2.6 un <3.9 unR <5'
<5" <0.8 u <5"
776 b 6150 eJ 4110
<LO u <5.1 un <JO u
<20u 0.89 b <20 u
<20u 40.1 U 17.7 b"
I of3
MW-02 (FF) MW-02 (FF) MW-OJ MW-OJ
MW-02 MW--02 MW-OJ MW-OJ HII SSL
Normal Normal Normal !liormal GroundV1-ater
1129/2001 4/30/2003 1/30/2001 4/3onoo3 15A NCA 2L • <13.8 u <JOO u 1160" <\00 u NS
<3.5 u <10 u <3.5 u 4.8 b NS
<3.9 u <10 u <3.9 un <!Ou 0.02
37J SI • 40.3 eJ 66.11 e 2,000
<0.2 u 0.41 b 0.21 bU. J <5' NS
<0.4 u <5' <0.4 u <5' 1.8
4210 ,.,, 211300" 11500 e NS
<0.9 u <5' 7.8 3.3 b so
1.7 bU <5' 2.9 bJ <5' NS
4.8 bU <5" 3.1 bU. J <5" 1000
10.6b <100 u 1210 *oJ <lOOu 300
<2.6u <3" <2.6 u <3 " 1S
1118 b 726 b 4630 4520 e NS
96.5 16.3 e 2611 * 16.5 e so
<0.1 u <0,2 u <0.1 u <0.2 u 1.1
6.6 <5" 6.8 U <5" 100
1700 1830 5990 * 3520 NS
<3.9 un 2.6 un <3.9 unR <5' so
<0.8 un <5' <0.8 u 0.87 b 17.5
5120 eJ "" 11870 eJ 5890 NS
7.1 bU <\Ou <5.1 un <10 u NS
<0.5 u <20u 4.0 bJ I.I b NS
30.4 <20u 15.6bU 19.6 b* 1050 •
Location Identification MW-OJ MW-OJ
Fidd Sample Jdentlfu:ation MW-DUP-01 MW-DUP-01
Satnpk Type Fltld Duplicalt Fltld Duplinll'
Date Collected I/J0/2001
Filed Lab Ml'tah (p.gfl)
Aluminum 1184.
Aniimony <J.5 u
Arsenic <3.9 un
Barium J0.2 tJ
Beryllium <0.2 u
Cadmium <0.4 u
Calcium 23500 •
Chromium. Total 124
Cobalt 4.2 b
Coppn ..
lro, 1840 *nJ
L<-' <2.6 u
Magnesium .. ,.
Manga.no:se 291 •
MeTCury <0.1 u
Nickel 110
Potassium 5170 •
Selenium <3.9 unR
Silver <0.8 u
Sodium 7510 eJ
Thallium <5.1 un
Vanadium J.1 b
Zinc 96.8
Notes:
I. NS = No St.,ndard established
2. (FF) = Field filtered.
3. Qua!ificn summarized at end of se<:t
ATFMr/LBL
N:\Jobs\1081.2593\GW Qulity.ds (FIXED METALS IN WG)
2082593.01160101 MADI
6/17/2003
4/J0/2003
<JOO u
<10 u
<10u
68.1 t
<5'
<5'
12000 t
J.2 b
<5'
<S'
JI.I b
<)'
4710 l'
16.8 t
<0.2 u
<S'
3910
<5'
<5'
6250
<!Ou
1.7 b
19.5 b*
MW-OJ (FF)
MW-OJ
Normal
I/J0/2001
<\J.8 u
<3.5 u
<J.9 u
40.7
<0.2 u
<0.4 u
18300
<0.9 u
J.7 b
25.6
24.8 b
<2.6u
4650
m
<0.1 u
4.8 bU
4860
<3.9 un
<0.8 un
'830 tJ
6.3 bU
1.7 b
41.6
SUMMARY OF FIXED METALS
RESULTS IN GROUND WATER SAMPLES
JOHNSOS CO:-OTROLS BATTERY GROUP, INC.
WINSTON SALEM, NORTH CAROLINA
PLA:",I AR[A
MW-OJ (FF) MW-OJ(FF) MW-OJ (FF)
MW-OJ MW-DUP-01 MW-DUP-01
Normal Fitld Duplinlt Held Duplieatt
4/30/2003 1/30/2001 4/30/2003
<100 u 259 U <100u
<10u <J.5 u <\Ou
<10 ll <3.9 u <10 u ., . l7 ., .
<S' <0.2 u <5'
<5' <0.4 u <5'
!0900 24100 11000
2.4 b 24.4 1.9 b
<5' J.7 b <5'
<5' 70.6 <S'
<100 u 967 <100 u
<)' <2.6 u <)'
4250 4440 4320
15.6 e m 16.
<0.2 u <0.1 u <0.2 u
<S' 52.5 <5'
3720 5310 3950
2.6 uo <3.9 un 2.6 uo
<5' <0.8 un <5'
""' 6720 ,J 5590
<10 u 7.9bU <10u
<20u 1.9 b <20u
19.4 b 98.6 11.5 b
MW-04
MW-04
r-:ormal
1/2912001
60.5 b0U
<3.5 u
<3.9 un
74.6 eJ
<0.2 u
<0.4 u
2790 •
<0.9 u
<0.6u
<0.9u
72.1 b0nU.J
<2.6 u
8'1 b
904 •
<0.1 u
2.4 bU
3770 •
<3.9 unR
<0.8 u
4430 tJ
<S.I un
<0.5 u
7.9 bU
2 of3
MW-04 MW-04 (FF) MW-04 (FF)
MW-04 MW-04 MW-04 HH SSL
Normal :•formal Normal Ground .. altr
4/29/2003 1/29/2001 4/2912003 ISA NCA 2L • 49.7 b <13.8 u <!00 u NS
<IOu <3.5 u <10u NS
<10 u <3.9 u <IOu 0.02
64.S l' 70.8 60.2 l' 2,000
<S' <0.2 u <5' NS
<5' <0.4 u <5' 1.8
916 bl' 278-0 885 b NS
1.9 b <0.9 u I b 50
<5' <0.6 u <5' NS
<S' 2.3 bU <S' 1000
80.4 b <9.8 u <IOOu 300
<)' <2.6 u <)' 15
447 bl' 856 b 413 b NS
38.1 e "' 31.3 t 50
<0.2 u <0.1 u 0.13 b 1.1
<5' 2.7 bU <5' 100
3460 3770 3460 NS
<5' <3.9 un 2.6 un 50
I.lb <0.8 un <5' 17.5
1960 b 3520 eJ 1570 b NS
<!Ou 7.4 bU <10 u NS
<20u <0.5 u <20 u NS
2l • 6.0bU 19.1 b 1050 •
i,,xldion Identification
Fkld Sample ldentifictUion
Sample Type
Date Collected
Find Lab Mttals (µ.g/1)
Aluminum
Antimony
Ar.enic
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Calcium
Chromium. Total
Cobalt
Copper
lroa
'-'"'
Mag~siwn
Manga~!.e
M~ul)"
Nickel
Potassium
Selenium
Silver
Sodium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
No~s:
I. NS = No Standard established
2. (FF)= Field Iii~
3. Qualifier; summarized at end of sect
A TF/vlr/LBL
N:\Jobs\208\2593\GW Qua!i1y.,ds (FIXED METALS IN WGJ
2082593.01160101 MADI
6/17/2003
MW-05 MW-05
MW-05 MW-0,
Normal Normal
ll3MOOI 4/29/1003
970 • 90 b
<3.S u <IO u
<3.9 un <JO u
62.9 eJ 52.5 t
<0.2 u <S'
<0.4 II <S'
1580 • 559 bt
20 8.9 II ,., 1.4 b
7.7 U <S'
1360 °nJ 184 ,., <3'
936 b 583 ..
'". 70.6 t
<0.1 u <0.2 II
18.5 6.1
3150 * 2670
<3.9 unR <S"
<0.8 u <S"
◄920 eJ , ... ,
<5.1 un <10 II
2.Sb <20 II
25.1 15.3 b*
SUMMARY OF FIXED ~1ETALS
RESULTS IN CROUl"iD WATER SA~1PLES
JOH1'SOS COl"iTROLS BATTERY CROUP, INC.
WISSTOS SALEM, 1'ORTH CAROLINA
PLANT AREA
MW-05(fF) MW-OS (FF) MW-06
MW-05 MW-05 MW-06
Normal Normal Normal
1/30/1001 ◄/29/1003 1(30/1001
m <100u 168 •u
<3.5 u <\Ou <3.S II
<3.9 u <10 u <J.9 un
◄5.8 ... 43.5 eJ
<0.2 II 0.13 b <0.2 II
<0.4 u <S' <0.4 II
1450 526 b 3660 •
<0.9 u 1.8 b 13b
1.7 bU 1.2 b <0.6u
4.5 bU <5 II 2.7 bU
m 52.9 b 176 •nJ
<2.6 II <3' ,.,
761 b 531 b "'' 326 60.8 t 1130 •
<0.1 II <0.2 II <0.1 u
5.5 U 2.7 b 2.9bU
3030 2580 2900 •
<3.9 1111 2.6 UD <3.9 unR
<0.11 un <S" <0.8 u
3740 ,J 1650 b ◄580 ,J
6.4 bU <!Ou <5.1 un
<0.5 u <2011 <0.5 II
10.4 bU <2011 13.4 bU
3 of 3
MW-06 MW-06(Ff) MW-06(FF)
MW-06 MW-06 MW-06 HHSSL
Normal Normal Normal Croundwatn
◄/l'J/2003 1130/1001 4/29/2003 15A l"iCA 2L • 133 <13.8 u <]00 u NS
<10 II <3.S u <\Ou NS
<]0 II <3.9 u <\Ou 0.02
58.4 t 38.8 57.4, 2,000
<S' <0.2 II <S' NS
<S' <0.4 II <S' 1.8
2080 t 3710 3'70 NS
6.7 <0.9 u 0.89 b so
<S' <0.6 u <S' NS
<S' 3.5 bU <S' 1000
320 <9.8 u 571 300
<3' 4.7 <)" 15
996b< I 140 1250 NS
967 t IOSO 3060 t so
<0.2 u <0.1 u <0.2 u 1.1
3.5 b 4.2 bU 1.4 b 100
3110 2810 "" NS
<S" <3.9 un 2.6 un so
<S' <0.8 un <S" 17.5
2560 3790 ,J 1360 NS
<\Ou 8.1 bU <10 II NS
<20u <0.5 II <20 II NS
10.2 b• 12.3 bU 27.1 1050 •
S:10"0 n ,:·0> nnp SN ",, n O"I> """ n ,:·0> nnp n n ,:·0> n 5"0> '' n S:"O> nnr> " n S:"O> n i;·O> '"" qfro n •·O> " n S:'O> n •·IP SN n s:·O> n ,·n:, "' n S'O> n S:'O> ; qff"I n S:'O> "' ",, 00·1> tt·o n )'0> n s:·O> • " II >"0> n >"O> """ II S"O> n >"O> SN II S"O> .... WO n >"O> .... '' n >"O> n 1;-0> " n >"O> n •·o:, '' n >"O> n >·O> 1,1·0 r ro·r oos, n )"0> n >"O> " n >"O> n >"O> ,, n >"O> n >·O> "" n S"O> m SN n >"O> n >"O> t,.-0 nnJ;> n >"O> ,, n >"O> n >"O> ' qf l'O"t n >"O> oo, ' 110"£:> SN ",, n O"f> '" "[> n O"f> "' r' llij"f> " n >"O> n >""O> '" n >"O> n >"O> '" n 1;-0> n >"O> 9>"0 n ,-o> n S""O> S("O n ,:·0> n >"O> '" n >"O> n 5"0> "' n •·0> n S"'O> • " n ,-0> n )'0> ' n >"O> n )"0> oo, n >"O> n )"0> SN n >'O> n )""O> ll"O n 5"0> n S"O> oor n 5"0> n )"O> 'IlV::>.-.: VS! I fOOl/0(/)' IOOZ/0£11 »l• .. p11DOJ::) aiundna Pl"l.4 a1ut1dna Pl"!J ,~-s HH \ChilnO".\\l'i 10-dl"IO·.\\l'i f0-.\\111 f0-,\\1,i lJO J n ,:·oc, ",, n i;·O> n ,:·0> n ;·o,. n S:"O> qff"O n s:·O> n s:·O> n S'O> qfc-o ",, n ,:·o,. n >"O> n >"O> n >"O> n >"O> n >"O> n ,·o> n >"O> ' n >"O> n >"O> n >"O> n >"O> n )"0> n )"0> n )"0> n >"O> ,, ",, ",, ",, n ,·o> n ,·o> n •·0> n •·o> n >"O> n )'0> n •·O> n 1;-0> ".-Ct> n i;·O> n )"0> n 1,·0> II 1,·0> (OOUOflt l•WJO!',j fO-.\\l'i ro-. ..-.1-. n ,:·0> n ,:·0> n S'O> n O"I> ",, n O"I> n ,:·o,. nn)> n s·o:, n S:"O> n 1,·0> n ,:·0> ri r, .... n ,;:·o,. n 1;-0:;, n >"O> n ,·o> n ;·O> qft·o nrz:·o mfz:·o n s:·O> I\>"{)> n ','O> ">0> n >"O> n S:'O> nnp n s:·0> n S:'O> ,,,., n s·CP no·1> ",, no·1;, n S:"O> ••O> n S:"O> n >"O> n >"O> II >"0> n >"O> n >"O> n ,·o> n >"O> II.-!)> n ,-0> ri r, n )"0> ,-, n >"O> n >"O> ",O> n ,--0> n )"0> n >"O> n ,-0> n >"O> n >"O> r O"f rn " n >"O> n >"O> n )"0> n >"O> n >"O> n >"O> n >·O> n >"O> n .--0> r,·o n >"O> n .--0> n >"O> n >"O> n ,-o> n >"O> n >"O> n ,-0> n >"O> n >"O> ,-, n >"O> n >""O> ",O> n O"f> ,, 11 o·, no·f> ",, n o·r> no·t> ",, n O"f> 110"f> ",, no·r> n >"O> n,-ct, n )"0> n )"O> n >"O> n )"0> n S'O> n >"O> n )"0> n l"'O> n ,:·0> n S""O> n >"O> n >"O> n >"O> riro n ,:·o> n 5·0,,. n )'0> n >"O> n >"O> n )'0> n >"O> n ,·o,,. n >"O> .... n ,·o,. n >"O> n >"O> n >"O> .... n >"O> n )'0> rfn n >"O> n )'0> n >"O> n •·0> n >"O> IOOUOf/1 I fOOUOflt' IOOW,UI I l•WJO!,,[ 1•111-10"' l•mJD"-i (0-,\\l'i ZD-·.\\l'i l:0-.\\l'i (0-,\\111 tll".\\111 Z0-,\\111 V'.!IIV .l.-.:V"Jd V"-lnOHV::> H.1110.-.: ·111:n.,-s NO.lSNI.\\ ':)!>.:I ',illOII~ .\ll3.Ll V8 S'lOll..1.-.:o::> .-.:OS!>.::HOr nnt, n )'Ct> ",, 110"1> n 1,·0> n ,:·0> qfro·o n s:·O> n >"O> n ,:·o,. n ,:·o> n S""O> qft·o rnfrn II S:"0> n ,;:·o,. n S:'O> rin n S:'O> rl'n qfn n 1;-0> <1!.-0 rfn n s:·0> n S:"O> n •·0> n >"O> n >"O> n >"O> n )"0> II •. ()> n >"O> rr,o n >"O> n >"O> n >"O> n >"O> .... rco r,n ro·, n i"O> n )"O> n •·O> n )"0> n >"O> n )"0> n )"0> n >"O> n )"0> nn1> n )"0> n >"O> n S"O> r 0·1 qfgi:ro n >"O> ,, (111>1 "[> n o·f> ",, rro·t ,, n O"f> n >"O> ri" n >·O> ri" n >"O> ri t'O n ,-·o> n ,·o> n •·0> n S"O> n •·0> rt" qftn rt ro n ,--0> '" n !;-0> nni:, n •·O> n ,·o,. II ,-0> n >"O> II 5'0> n >"O> n 5·0,. n >"O> fOOUH/t U)OZl6Z/I 1•auos 1•10uo,"1 10-. ..-., .. 10-.v.1,i 111-".\\l'i 10-.\\l't! S".fldi,iVS 113.lV,\'\ ONflOtl:l NI s.1,11S3H ONflOdl~O:J ::>INV:JtlO '.nl.lV"IO,\ JO ,\HVl\/111/lS £001'./ll/9 lOVV. 10109110-(6HSO;: (!).'I\ NI Xl,\) •wN11Jm6 ,'l\0\(6S:l\80t,sqor,,N ,tntll·'lilV ~JOI""' IS ~iuwnnn< '='J!lm0 ·;: P""l"'[qns.> p.,q,uois ON-SN 'I :,<>ION -->J>UON~ IM'!A "1eµ:,l'Jll'!A ""~U0101'P"l (;t:Jl.J~1.\qpom1q,u.1 ~t•P!Q·('l-mut """'(lXIJOl1.P!Cl·r 1 =ui au;,r,101_ t 3::M ~Aqµ,:w,,140,up l """" C~1Alfl>WIQ•r1) ~1Ax-o apuorq, ~1"-lfl>W Ul'fO~X au:,ipsJIIQ(UOl11J~UH --""l!ljPW0.10flll!po.lOfllll(J alltt(laWOWOJql(J :IU"'l>"'UtlJO[l(""WOJ'll{] >UadwdaJO[llllQ·f' I -sp """~fllll(J·t I~ ><1-.p;>U!OiO[lp WJOJOiOIIQ >U"'(P<UO(ll) """""""'" ""'-'O]l(l"1Pl Uoq.t•J ""'JIM!PUOQ.l•:J :IU1'1jl"'110WOJ8 111JOJOWOJ8 :IU1'1j~OJO[l(l!polllOJ8 _,, ~v ''""''""'I J.{inq<m 1-''IPH) ""10U"0J<W-l·l"'ll"rn -~=>H-l (:lllOP'J[ tAl(l:I i"'IPW) :IUOIISlllfl•l ~JO!l[ll(J·t·I aunu;,qo.w[l(l!Q•f"I ("""1.(i,s:,W) au:izuaq1A~!-'L·>"f'l auadoJdoJO(l(llQ·(L ""s,p:>WO['l"<J·C I :IUlZU:>qOJOJl(llQ•l:"1 ao=u:>qJA'IPW!,J.1-.-"Z"l """ZU:IQOJOl4'!-' L·1>'t 1 ~ll(ll(J·J'l :IUWl(POJO[l(ll(J·J'I ""~"l'P!-'.l·Z'l"I aut~l(lLQ.:l.l·l'l'l"l ""~"11P!-'.1·1Tt (l,'2") sp,,•odmo:, ,,■-~.JO "1!1•18.\ Pl»D•:J~n>O Hil",l~f'/"'"S 110//0,tJ/IIUf'/ ,,,,,,,"S f'M:/ .,.,,.,,J11•~,, ,,.,,.,..,,
Affl'-"b-lLBL N:\Job:s\208\2593\GW Quahty.ds (VOC IN WGf 2082593.01160101 MADI 6117/2003 SU~IMARY OF\"Ol.ATILE ORGASIC COMPOUSD RESULTS IS GROUSD WATER SAMPLES JOHNSON CONTROLS BATTERY GROUP. INC. ,,,., ... "·••if"••··· 1 Fi,ri,J .S.-,,k 1,1~,.,if.,,•NI" S• .. pi~ TftK o.u c.11=~• \"olullr O<1:■-k Compoand, (ia~) L.l.l-Trichlonxthane 1.1.2.2-T cm,chloroethane 1.1.2-T rn,hlonxthanc l.1-Dichloroc:thane 1.J-Dx,bloroetl,rne 1.2.4-TrichJ<.>«>br:nttn<, 1.2.4-Trirocliy!bnucnc l.2-Dichl~ 1.2-Dichlorortluine l .2-Dichlorupr!JP'lne 1.3.5-T rimc:<hylbenzcnc (Mesitylenc f 1.3-0ichlorobenttne 1.4-Dich~ 2-8uraaone (Methyl ethyl ketone) 2-Hcunone •-Mefhyl-2-penta!IOIII< (Mnhyl isot,o.dyl kcione) A=~ -Bromodichloromethane Bromofonn •-~ Carbon disulfide Carbon 1nnchloridc Chl"""""=< c,,""'"""~ Chloroform °""""""'"~ cis-1.2-Di<h~ylene cis-1.3-Dichloroi,ropcne O,bmmochloromnbane O,bromomcthane Dichloroditluor=l,ane bbylbelizenc HcxachlorobutadiCM Xylcnes. a & m Mefhylcnc chloride a-Xylcnc ( l.2-Dimro,yJbmzcne) "-T Clnchlorocthylenc(PCE) Toluene 1n1ns--lJ-[};cbk,ro,;,htne lnlns-1.J•Dichl~ Trichlon,et:hylcne (TCE) T richlorofluaromnhane Vinyl a=oic Vinyl chlaridc --,-L NS~ No Sanobrd establi.i..d 2. Quahficn. surnmuized at end of ocction. MW-IM MW-IM Normal WINSTON SALEM. NORTH CAROLl:,/A PLA:\"T AREA MW-IM MW.OS MW..(M MW-05 Narmal Normal 1119/2001 -'/19/1003 I 1130/1001 <0.5 u <0.S 11 <0.5 u <tl.5 u <0.S 11 <tl.5 u <tl.5 u <0.5 u <0,5 II <0.5 II <(1.5 u <0.5u <0_5 II <0.5 II <0.511 <0.5 u <0.5 u """" <0.5 u <0.5 II <0.5 II <0.5 II <0.5 u OJµ <0.5 II <0.5 u <0.5 II <0.5 u <0.5 u <1Uu <0.5 u <0.5 u <0.5 u <0.S u <0.5 II 0.l JJ <O.S u <0.5 u 0.1 JJ <3.0 u <3" <3.0 u <3.0 II <3" <3.0 u <3.0" <3. <3.0u <J,0 II 3 I0UJ OJJ 0.06jb <0.5 u ... <0.5 u UJ <0.5 II <0.5 u <0.5 II <05. <0.5 II <0.5 II ,. <0.5 u <0.5 II <0.5 u <0.5 u <0.5 II <0.S 11 o.04 J <0.5 II <0.5 u <0.5" <0.5 II " 0.1 J '"' <0.5 II <tl.5 II <0.5 u <0.5 II <tl.5 u <0.5 II <0.5 II <tUu uµ <0.5 II <0.5 II ,,, <0.5 II <0.5 u <0.5 II <0.5 II G.06J <0.5 u <0.5 II <0.5" <0.5 II <0.5 u <0.5 u <O.S u <1.0 II <>" <1.0 II ., 0.3 jb 0.SUJ <:0.5 \I <0.5 u ,,µ <0.5" <0.5 II <0.5" <0.5 II <0.5 II <0.5" <0.5 II 0JJb 0.2JUJ <0.5 u <0.5 u <0.5 II <0 . .S u <0.5 II ooµ <0.5 II G.116Jb <0.5 II <0.5 II <0.5. <0.5 II <1.0 u <'" <l.0 u <0.5 u <0.5" <0.5 II MW-05 I MW-06 MW-05 MW-06 Normal Nermal -'11911003 1130/1001 <O.S u <O.S u <O.S u <0,5 u <0,5 u <0,5 u <0.5 u <0,5 II <tl.5 u <0.5 II <0.S u <0.5 u O.OlJ <0.5 u <0,5 u <0.5 II <0.5 u <0.5 II <0.5 u <0.5 II 0.0J j <O.S u <0.5 u <O.S u <0.5 II <0.5 u ,, <3.0 u <3" <3.0 u <3. <J.0 II 3 8,0 U <0.,o <0.5 u <0.5 u ... <0,5 II <0.5 II <0.5 II <0.5 II <0.5" <0.5 II <0.5 II <0.5 II , ... , <O.Su <O.S u <0.5 u OJJ " <0.5 II <0.5 u <0.5 II <0.5 u <0.5 u <0.5 II <0.5 u <0.5 II <0.5 II <0.5 II 0.llljb <0.5 II <0.5 II <0.5 u <0.5 II <0.5 u <>. <l.0 u 0.-' Jb 0.SjU <0.5 u <0.5 u <0.5 II <0.5 II <0.5 u 0.5 U 0.ljb <0,5 u <0.5 II <0.5 II <0.5 II <Q_j II ...,, <0.5 II <0.5 II <0.5 II <>. <1.0 II <0.5 II <0.5 II 2 of2 MW-06 MW-06 I HH SSL N•rmal Gn••d•atrr -'119/1003 15A NCA lL <O.S u ,oo <tl.S u 0.17 <Q.S II NS <0.5 u ,oo <0.5 u ' <0.5 u '" • <0.5 u "" <0.5 u "" <0.5 u 0.)8 <0.5 u 0.56 <0.5 II ,SO <0.5 u "" <0.S II " 'j "" <3" "" <3. NS ' ,oo <0.5 u <0.5 II "' <0.5 u 0.l'l <0.5 u NS <0.5 u ,oo <0.5 u 03 .... , so <0.5 u '800 O.lj 0.19 <0.5" '' <0.5 11 '" <0.5" o., <0.5 11 0,41 <0.5 u NS 1.07 jb ""' <0.5 u " • <0.5 u 0.44 <>. S30 0.5 jb ' <0.5 u S30 <0.5. NS 0, o., 0.ljb ,ooo <tl.5" '" <0.5 u o., I.OJ j 2.8 <0.5 u HOO <>" NS <0.5 11 0.015
• •
SllMMAII~ ot· J,UII•' OL.A I ,u: IJII.GAr.lC COMPO\lr-U RLJ,IJL"I J, '" CJH)llr,IJ w,n 1:11 SAMl'U:s
JOIINSOI', CON"I KOL\ BA'J"I UIY GIWUl', l1'C.
l«"•lio~ "'"tijk-,/,,.. MW-Ol
Flt/,I Su•pl, ld,~11Jfr~t/01t M W,O l
S••P'• r,-,,, l'or,.11
/J•uCo//,.-1,tJ 1129/lllOI
So1nl-Vol1dl, OrKani< Compound, {jle,'I)
v· ... ,ybi,c l...:hkiro1Prupan, <nu
2,4.l,lrichl,"',ph,,,n,,I <lij u
2,4,b-l richk,ruphrn<ol <2~ u
2.4.IJichioruph,,.'t><>I <2~ u
2,4,1Jin>1.'lhyl r,hcnol <l~ u
2,4.IJinitrupll<ool • 1-W u
2,4,U,n,IMoluonc <29 u
2.b-!J,nnruwlurnc <l~ u
U'hl"run.pl,<h,lcne •:2'1 u
?-Chloruphrnol <2'111
l-Meohyln•ph<hak-.,e •:29 u
2-M<lhylphoru,l(o-{"..,..,i) •'l'I u
l-Nur< .. nilme •S7u
l-N,ll\lphonol ,·JQ u
J.J'.l)iehloo~"'"'iJu>C •S7 u
J.s,truanilinc: <'711
-1,(,-llLnotr,~2-me<hylphcot~ <S7 11
-1-!lrum.,pb<nyl phrnyl Olm <2'1 II
4-(lolo«,-J-n.,11,ylpheot,I <2'1 u
4.(loloruanilinc <2'1 II
4-Chl<t\'f'h,11)'1 phenyl olh<r <29 u
4-M<lhylphcnol (p-Cn,..,i1 <2'1 u
4-Ni"""'1ih11< <J7 u
4 .. :,.;,,,.,p1,,..,..,1 <S7u
lkn1,o(o,onthrw;c11< <29 u
lknr.i<Mflwnonlh<n< <l'I u
IJenl<~IJ,h.i~ryle"" <19 u
u .. ..,,,~1.1n.,onuuhon< <2'1"
bu(l,.hlor,-,11._,.y) M-<2Q u
bili(l..:hlm,ethyl) Uher (2-l.lolvrocthyl ~lh<rJ <Hu
0<,(2..,11,ylhc,yll l'hllublc JIG
lkn,yl bucyl p/Uh•l•Ce <Hu
C&lbatule <29 u
Chry><'llll <nu
D,bciv~•.hlanthracc11< <l') II
D,bcn,.ufunn <2'1u
Diethyl l'hth.,lo,e <2'1 u
l),rno:dlyl phth.,I""' <2'1 u
IJ,-n-buryl phlh•I"• <lY u
l)j..,-.,,;1ylphd\,,I•"' IIJ
tlu,or••>thc-nc <l9 u
fl,.._.....-.: <2Q u
lkuchluruhcollC"" <Hu
He.,,,;hloru..")',loprnUldu.,>c <2'1 u
I leuchluruc1h.llll <l'I u
lrnkn.~1.2.l-.:.d)l'yrcne <l'lu
lwphuru,,c <l'I u
N,phlh•kn,• <2'1 u
.-.i,mborurnc <29 II
n-Num .. ~J,•n·l""'l'Yl•min,: <l9 u
n--.,trooodiphrnylarninc <2Qu
l'en"'chlornphcnul <S7 u
f'l>ena.nlhrrnc <l9 II
l'he,~,I <2'1 u
........
I .-.s -Nu St.<.,J•n.l ,•,c,1bli,h,-J
2. {I). lntnm "2l • G,o,mdwaler S!andard
J Oual,!,ers ern 5ummanzad 11l ,md ol sechon
All-'lvlr/LUL
.-.:l..luln\20~'2'9)',GW Qw.hty,,I, (SI/UC I~ WG)
20ll23'1J.OIIWIOI MADI
Wl71200J
MW-GI
MW-01
/\onnol
4/l~llOO.l
<I Ou
<lOu
<lOu
<10 u
<\Ou
<:10 u
<10 u
<IIJ u
<10 u
<10 u
<10 II
<10 II
<IOu
<)Ou
<IUu
-clOu
<IOU
<:I Ou
<lO u
<10 u
<10 u
<10 u
WI/\S-101', 1'AL.LM, 1',0R 111 CAIi.ill.ir.A
rLANI AIU:A
MW-GI
MW-Ulll'-GI
t'l<ld U..plltolr
4/l9/l003
<10 u
<IOU
<IOu
<I Ou
<I Ou
<10 u
<I Ou
<10 II
<10 u
<1(1 u
<!Ou
<)Ou
<:IOU
<1011
<:I Ou
<I Ou
<10 u
<I Ou
<10 u
<10 u
<10 u
<IOU
<IOu
<IOU
<IOu
<1011
<1011
<10 u
<10 II
<20 II
<10 u
<10 II
-,1011
MW-OZ
MW-02
l\or1111I
l/l91lOOl
<10 II
-,10 u
<IOU
<IOU
<JO u
<10 II
<1(1"
<lOu
<!Ou
<1011
<IOu
<JO"
<10u
<:IOu
<1011
<I Ou
<1011
<1011
<10 u
<10 u
<]0 II
<:!Ou
<:l'lu
<JOu
<I Ou
<I Ou
M\\-U
MW-01
1'a<mll
11.111/lOOl
<10 u
<10u
<1011
l.OJ
<10 II
<!Ou
<10 u
<IOU
<1011
<'.IOU
<1011
<10 u
<1011
<IOU
<IOu
<IOU
<I Ou
<10 u
<IOU
<19 u
<IOu
<10 u
<IOu
MW-111
MW,UUl'-01
flrld llupllulr
I/JQ/1001
<:I Ou
<JO u
<:1011
<1011
<IUu
UJ
<1011
<10 u
<10 u
<10 u
<IOU
<I Ou
<lOu
<IOu
<IOu
<IOU
<I Ou
<10 u
<10 u
<10 u
<!Ou
<!Ou
<IOu
<JOu
<IUu
<IOu
.clOu
<I Ou
<10 II
<10 II
MW-IM
MW-IM
/1,ormal
1129/JOOL
<'1.0 u
<9.0u
<9011
<9011
<9 Ou
<Q,Ou
<'IO"
<Q.Ou
<9,0 u
<Q.Ou
<'1.0"
<QO u
<9011
<Q,Ou
<9011
<9,0u
<Q.Ou
<9 0 u
<9.0u
<'10"
<9.0u
<90 u
<90u
<'I.Ou
<'I.Ou
MW-11~
MW-05
l\onul
l/J0/1001
<:IOu
<1011
<1011
<IOU
<10 u
<10 u
<10 u
<I Ou
<10 II
<I Ou
<]Ou
<!Ou
<IOU
<I Ou
<IOU
<10 u
<10 u
<10 u
<10 u
<IOu
<IOU
<IOu
<JOu
<:lOu
<1011
<1011
<10 u
MW.@•
MW-G• r-.., ... ,
1110/JOOI
<9,0u
<9 Ou
<</,0 II
<90 u
<'10" ~,.
<'10"
<Q,Ou
<9011
•9 Ou
<9011
<90 u
<90u
<90 u
<QOu
<Q,Ou
<9011
<9.0u
<9011
<'1.0"
<9.0u
<'10"
<90 u
<9,0 u
<Q,Ou
<19 u
<'I.Ou
<9 Ou
1 of I
IIU1'M,
Gr0Mnd>11orr
IM/\CAll,
NS
NS
NS
NS
140
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
28
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
3.S
NS
NS
5011)
210 111
2100 ii)
o.osni
0.0047 11'
0.047 (IJ
210
0.47 ii)
NS
0.031
3
100
NS
5 {IJ
0.0047 ill
28
5000
NS
700
140
280 ell
280
0.02
NS
NS
0.047 (IJ
36.8
21
NS
NS
NS
0.3
210
300
21011>
,,.
North Carolina •
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Waste Management
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
Dexter R. 11atthcws, Interim Director
April 22, 2003
Mr. Luis Flores
Remedial Project Manager
US EPA Region IV
61 Forsyth Street, I Ith Floor
Atlanta, Georgia 30303
RE: Comments on the Draft Work Plan/Proposal
Johnson Controls Battery Group, Inc. (JCBG)
NCO 000 770 487
Winston Salem, Forsyth County, North Carolina
Dear Mr. Flores:
•
The Draft Groundwater Sampling Work Plan, dated March 21, 2003, for groundwater
at the Johnson Controls Battery Facility, located in Winston-Salem, NC has been received
and reviewed. The following comments by the North Carolina Superfund Section are
submitted for your consideration. Please Provide a Final Groundwater San1pling Work Plan
prior to mobilization next Tuesday April 29.
Specific Comments:
I. The second paragraph on page 1 of the report states that PCB and SYOCs were excluded
from the list of groundwater analytes based on the first round of sampling results.
Monitoring well MW-01 should include analysis for SVOCs since it contained bis(2-
ethylhexyl)phthalate in the first round results. Phthalates are generally associated with
field or lab contamination due to contact with the rubber gloves used. SYOCs should
also be included in the parameters list under B. on page 2. Those doing the sampling
should be instructed not to touch the water samples or the interior of the lids or san1ple
bottles during sampling and analysis. Please make appropriate corrections.
2. The sample schedule should be in spring of 2003 rather than spring 2002.
1646 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-_1646
Phone: [phone] \ FAX: 9 I 9-715-3605 \ Internet: www.enr.state.nc.us
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY\ AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER-SO% RECYCLED/ 10% POST CONSUMER PAPER
Mr. Luis Flores
4-22-2003
Page 2 of2
• •
The State appreciates the opportunity to comment on this document and we look forward to
working with you on.the project. If you have any questions or comments, please call me, at
[phone], extension 341 or email at [e-mail]1.
Sincerely, ,-(
1 '9fe i ~. -t~1{,xUL01A
Randy McE!veen · \
cc: Dave Lown, N.C. Superfund Section
Environmental Engineer
NC Superfund Section
I O : I 9 am
March 21, 2003
l'v1r. Timothy J. Lafond
Johnson Controls Battery Group, Inc.
5757 N. Green Bay Avenue
PO Box 0591
i\1ilwaukee, Wisconsin 53201-059!
Re: Proposal for Groundwater Sampling
Winston-Salem Facility
Dear Tim:
+404 561 ,. T-60i: P 001/005 f-5S6 RA
M\VH Americas, Inc. (M\VH) is presenting this proposal for groundwater monitoring at the
JCBGI Winston-Salem facility, in accordance with JCBGI's previous commitment to the
USEPA for a second round of monitoring. As described in the design report submitted to
USEPA, a confirmation round of groundwater sampling would be completed during
removal action activities.
The gro,indwater sampling confirmation round includes analysis of metals, volatile organic
compounds, and pesticides in groundwater. Semi-volatiles and PCBs were explicitly
excluded from the list of analytes, based on the first round of sampling results reviewed
from the EE/CA investigation. The Quality Assurance Project Plan (QAPP) and Field
Sampling Plan (FSP) previously developed for the EE/CA guide this second round of
confirmation groundwater sampling and analysis.
The sections below outline the scope of work, estimated costs, and schedule associated
with this confirmation round sampling.
SCOPE OF WORK
A. Groundwater Sampling
The field technicians will sample each of the 6 monitoring wells using low-flow purge
sampling techniques to obtain representative groundwater samples. Prior to groundwater
sampling, each monitoring well will be purged. A clean plastic drop cloth will be spread
around the well prior to purging. Purging will be accomplished by removing groundwater
from the monitoring wells using a decontaminated, low-flow submersible pump with new
dedicated polyethylene discharge tubing. Purging will continue until water quality
parameters, including pH, temperature, redox, conductivity, and turbidity, have stabilized
and a minimum of 3 and maximum of 5 well-volumes will be removed or the well 1s
pumped dry. Purge water will be containerized in 55-gallon drums.
1-509 P 003/005 f-596
Once the wells have been proper! y purged, groundwater samples will be collected. The
groundwater samples for total metals analyses will be collected directly from the
polyethylene tubing. The groundwater sample for dissolved metals analyses will be field
filtered using a 0.45--rnicron inline filter with the polyethylene tubing and discharged into
the sample containers. The groundwater samples for VOCs and organochlorine pesticides
analyses will be collected using a clean closed top Teflon® bailer. Groundwater samples
will be placed in appropriate sample containers, preserved, properly labeled, and stored on
ice. Chain of custody procedures will be followed for collection and shipping the samples.
Field quality control (QC) samples will be collected to assess the quality of the analytical
data and to evaluate sampling and analytical reproducibility (precision). Field quality
control samples will consist of one each of a duplicate sample, field blank, matrix spike/
matrix spike duplicate, and trip blank. Each QC sample will be analyzed for all scheduled
parameters, except the trip blank, which will be analyzed for VOCs, only.
The groundwater Jeye) and total depth of each monitonng well will be measured using an
eiectronic water-level indicator to an accuracy of 0.01 feet prior to purging the well. The
water-level indicator will be rinsed with deionized water prior to each use. The depth to
groundwater will be recorded in the field logbook and the well volume will be calculated.
Liquids from the decontamination of sampling equipment and sample purge water will be
contained in 55-gal drums for later disposal or treatment by facility management.
B. "'ater Quality Analyses
Each of the six groundwater samples and QC samples will be analyzed for the following
parameters:
Toto! TAL Metnis
Dissolved T.4L Metals
voes
Organochlarine pesticides
3005A/60l0B/7470A
3005N60 I 0B/7 4 70A
5030B18260B
8081
Compuchem Laboratories of Research Triangle Park, NC will conduct the analyses of the
groundwater samples.
C. Report Preparation
After receipt from the laboratory, the groundwater quality results will be reviewed and a
brief written report will be prepared for eventual submittal to the USEPA. The report will
include a brief description of the methods, .report text, summary tables of analytical
parameter detections compared to groundwater quality standards, appended analytical
reports, and a table of groundwater level measurements. A dtaft copy of the report will be
prepared for JCBGI and comment prior to submittal to USEPA.
Mr. Timothv J _ Lafond . March 21. 2003 Johnson Controls Batter• Gro:.ip. T11c
Page 2
Apr-1\-03 i0:10am P 00,100:
D. Project Management/Meeting
Project management will include routine co=umcation with JCBGI and project staff,
scheduling, and cost management. A meeting has been budgeted to review results with
JCBGI in .tvii!waukee.
ESTIMATED COSTS
Estimated costs for this project are presented in the table below:
Task. Estimated Cost
Groundwater Sampling
\Vater Quality AnJlyscs
Report Preparation
Project Manngement/Mccting
Total
$ 7,800
3,600
1,200
2 100
$14,700
The work will be conducted on u time and materials basis in accordance with the attached
fee schedule and the April 7, 1997 Master Services Agreement. The actual costs may be
more or less than the estimate.
Assumptions that affect the cost estimate include the following:
The sampling crew will consist of 2 persons for 2 days.
• Costs for disposal or u·eatment of purge water are not included in the estimate.
• l\1\VH will make arrangements for delivery of the 55-gal drums to the facility.
• Data verification will be performed on the sample results by inspection of QC
sample results and normal laboratory QC procedure.
The report will not include any drawings or figures depicting groundwater quality
results.
• No meetings with the agency or development of final monitoring plans are included
within the budget.
SCHEDULE
The schedule for sampling will be established by JCBGI in Spring 2002. tv1\VH can
mobilize to the site within 2 weeks of notification of sampling to proceed.
Mr. Timothy J. Lafond March 2 I. 2003
Page 3
JohrL~nn Controls Battery Gronp1 Inc.
A.cr:2i-03 iG:20am Frcm-North -fund i-606 P 005/005 F-555
AUTHORIZATION
JCBGI' s authorization of ~{WH to conduct this work is signing and returning the attached
Work Order.
We appreciate the opportunity to continue services on this project for JCBGL Please call
me with any questions or comments.
Sincerely,
MWB AMERICAS, )NC
Daniel W Hall, PG
Project Manager
Enclosures: Work Order
DWH/vlr/LDL
\\Usmad I s02 \.\foi.n\Jobs\800\480 l \2003\501'Wp1Jt:\62__Lafoad_ WS S w Monitoring.doc
EC0480l .D0500\0 i -MAD1
Mr. Timothy J. Lafond Morch 21, 2003
Page 4
Johnson Contrcils B;itterv Qroup 1 Inc.
i ,J: \ 9 arr1 r-so; ?.0011oos F-sas
. ft .
~, . '
~
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
REGION 4
Atlanta Federal Center
61 Forsyth Street, S.W.
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960
FACSIMILE TRANSMITTAL COVER SHEET .
-·---·
TO: ~ .. _fl, itfc/7£.,,~. -
J 1JcDEN R COMPANY/ORGANIZATION:
DATE: ~@! /o3
I
PHONE NUMBER: FAX NUMBER: 'f/'7 -733-C/J' //
NUMBER OF PAGES SENT (Including this cover sheet): ;)
Please contact the person sending this fax if it is received poorly or incomplete,
FROM:
LUIS E. FLORES
NORTH SITE MANAGEMENT BRANCH
WASTE MANAGEMENT DIVISION
Phone Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
COMMENTS: ~;' u ~ ~ 6{,U i<V /'
V r-u "llf) J 0--C ~ Ciz!.f-!
r I ,
( --I I, c/-,; #-L -//'A, i --, I/ /I_ -. ,/V. ~rJ-2 '1 f ".fO :]od.J
/ -• Cl J '