NCD000770487_19920828_Johnson Controls Battery Group_SERB PA SI_Phase II Screening Site Investigation-OCR

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.I
,..-;.sv.n~ .. ;r....,~; .. .o,.,,., ~-
t':J. r / ,,_ ~ + .... 1 '"' ,,, ....
.~ :~ 1t~--\c .. ~, b ·;,1,.q r;· . · ;r,t
\:'1;:'!J •.· 'ffl " ' ·-. """ :~-, ,:::.:::::::::.~/
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
Division of Solid Waste Management
P.O. Box 27687 · Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687
James G. Martin, Governor
William W. Cobey, Jr., Secretary
Mr. Craig Benedikt
August 28, 1992
EPA NC CERCLA Project Officer
EPA Region IV Waste Division
345 Courtland Street, NE
Atlanta, Georgia 30365
~E: _Phase II, Screening Site Investigation
Johnson Controls/ Globe Battery Site
Winston-Salem, Forsyth County, North Carolina
NCD 000 770 487
Dear Mr. Benedikt
William L. Meyer
Direclor
Enclosed herewith is the Phase II, Screening Site Investigation
(SSI) Report by Greenhorne & O'Mara, Inc. for Johnson Controls/
Globe Battery Site (NCD 000 770 487).
Based on the information gathered and presented
and on the results of the data validation, the
Superfund Section is recommending that the sll~
next stage of the pre-remedial process.
in this report
North Carolina
move on to the
The following discussion
II, SSI sampling event
validation.
of the analytical results from the Phase
for the subject site, reflects data
A total of nine (9) environmental samples were collected to
characterize the site. To clictrd•~terize whether a release of
contaminants has occurred, a limited subsurface and surficial
investigation was conducted to obtain ground water, surface
water, soil and sediment samplces for laboratory analysis. The
sampling locations are shown on Appendix A, Figure 2. These
samples consisted of three (3) surface soil samples, two (2)
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
soil boring samples, two (2)
sediment samples.
surface water samples and two (2)
Soils
A background surface soil sample (JCSSOl) was collected northeast
of the above ground storage area. No Purgable Organics were
reported in this sample. No Base Neutral Acids (BNAs) were
reported in this sample. See Table 1 for inorganic results.
A composite surface soil
acid storage tank area.
this sample. No BNAs were
for inorganic results.
sample (JCSS02) was collected near the
No Purgable Organics were reported in
reported in this sample. See Table 1
A composite surface soil sample (JCSS03) was collected near the
drum storage/loading dock. No Purgable Organics were reported in
this sample. No BNAs were reported in this sample. See Table 1
for inorganic results.
A background soil boring sample (JCSBOl) was collected the same
place as sample (JCSSOl). The sample was taken at approximately
15.5 feet. No Purgable Organics were reported in this sample.
No BNAs were reported in this sample. See Table 1 for inorganic
results.
A soil boring sample (JCSB02) was collected near the acid storage
area. The sample was taken at approximately 11 feet. No
Purgable Organics were reported in this sample. No BNAs were
reported in this sample. See Table 1 for inorganic results.
An observed release to soils has been documented from the data
gathered relative to the soil samples. It appears that there are
releases of arsenic, calcium and lead, but all inorganics except
lead were within naturally occurring concentrations for
inorganics in the Eastern United States. Lead (920 ppm) was
found to be in excess of the soils natural concentration by more
than 3 times. Lead contamination may be attributed to site
activities as this site was used to charge lead-acid batteries
for the automotive industry. Soil boring samples were taken
instead of groundwater samples because groundwater could not be
reached by hand auger methods.
Sediments
An sediment sample (JCSEDOl) was collected north of the site. No
Purgable Organics were reported in this sample. No BNAs were
reported in this sample. The inorganics detected in this sample
were barium (73 ppm) and lead (18 ppm).
A sediment sample (JCSED02) was collected from south
of the site. Acetone (lOJC ppm) was the only Purgable Organic
-2-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
reported in this sample. The qualifier ''C'' indicates that this
containment may be a lab contaminant. Acenaphthylene (330K ppb),
fluorene (330K ppb), phenanthrene (367 ppb), anthracene (330K
ppb), fluoranthene (2167 ppb), pyrene (1700 ppb),
benzo[a]anthracene (800 ppb), chrysene (1783 ppb), bis(2-
ethylhexyl)phthalate (4683 ppb), benzo[b]fluoranthene (1667 ppb),
benzo[a]pyrene (1650K ppb), indeno[l,2,3-cd]pyrene (1650K ppb)
and dibenzo[g,h,i]perylene (1650K ppb) were the only BNAs
reported in this sample. The inorganics reported in this sample
were barium (25 ppm), chromium (45 ppm) and lead (4700 ppm). The
concentration of lead is considered hazardous by RCRA definition.
There appears to be releases documented from the data gathered
relative to the samples collected. The releases appear to be
acenaphthylene, fluorene, phenanthrene, anthracene, fluoranthene,
pyrene, benzo(a]anthracene, chrysene, bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate,
benzo[b]fluoranthene, benzo[a]pyrene, indeno[l,2,3-cd]pyrene and
dibenzo[g,h,ilperylene. Lead was the only inorganic found
significantly greater than naturally occurring levels in soils.
Lead appears to be attributable to site activities. The other
releases are not known to be associated with site activities.
Surface Water
An surface water sample (JCSW0l) was collected north of the site.
No Purgable Organics were reported in this sample. No BNAs were
reported in this sample. Lead (8 ppm) was the only inorganic
reported in this sample.
A surface water sample (JCSW02) was collected south of the site.
No Purgable Organics were reported in this sample. No BNAs were
reported in this sample. The inorganics reported in this sa~ple
were.barium (0.09 ppm) and lead (1.035 ppm).
barium and
from the
An observed release of
assumed to be documented
surface water samples. This
to site activities.
release
lead in surface water is
data gathered relative to
appears to be attributable
Based on the information gathered and presented in this report, the
NC Superfund Section recommends that the next pre-remedial
investigation be performed at the site. The concentrations of lead
found in the soils on site, and in the sediments and surface water
flowing from the site, may have resulted from releases of lead to
the air during filter bag changes. A possible air pathway release
may also exist. Although the assessment of the site included this
possible air release, the known lead concentrations in the other
media are sufficient to require further investigation of the site.
-3-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
If you have any questions, please contact me at 919-733-2801.
Sincerely,, _ ;! /
n----N~-1~
ver Nicholson Head
tracts Manag%ent Branch
Enclosures
-4-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
TA:LE 1
JOH~SO~ CONiROLS/GLOB: BATTERY
HCD 000 770 ◄87
SOILS
NA !URAL
P.A~oE JCSSOl JCSS02 JCSS03 JCSBOl JCSB02 !NOP.GANI CS (PPM) (PPM) (PPM) (P?M) (PPH) ( ppr,) -------------------------------------------------------------------------
ALUMINUM 0.7-)lOI 37000 28000 1&000 17000 4&000 · ANTIMONY (1-8.8 9, &U IOU 9.5U 9.8U ZOU AP.SEN IC (0.1-73 2U ·, 3.3 2U 2U 3.& BARIUM 10-1500 310 1 I 0 120 230 120 · BERYLLIUM (1-7 2. I 0.79 0.81 1.8 0.97 CADMIUM 0.0!-0,7 0.91UJ 0.9SUJ 0.90UJ 0.93UJ 0._~9UJ CALCIUM 0.0!-20I JOU • 980 !BOO· ~OU 220 · CHROMIUM 1-1000 25 35 2& l4 27 . COBAL i (0.3-70 18 7 19 14 15 COPPER (1-700 22 11 27 49 22 IP.ON 0,01-)lOI 39000 29000 22000 25000 30000 LEAD (10-300. I 7 18 920 1U 19 MSNESIUM 0.00S-SI 8800 1400 3900 4700 4200 ,. MANGANESE (2-7000 2100 400 750 2300 410 MERCURY 0.01-3.4 O. IUJ 0.2UJ 0.2UJ 0. IUJ 0. ,Uj NICKEL · (3-700 .· ?" -• 8.7 l4 · 16 12 POTASSIUM 0,00S-3,7% 12000 1200 3400 &600 3900 : SELENIUM . (0.1-3.9 0.23U 0.23U 0.23U 0.24U 0 .24U SILVER · 0.01-5 !. IUJ I. 2UJ 1.!UJ 1.2UJ 1.2UJ •' SODIUM 0,05-Sl 220U !SOU 360U I 40U · 200U THALLIUM tu 0.46U 0.46U 0, 47U !U VANAD!UK <i-S00 71 62 so 47 54 ZINC (S-2900 I 10 20 4S 54 46 CYANIDE S.6U 5.5U 5.2U s.su 5.Bu
NOTES:
; .\ I) NA -NOT ANALYZED I
2) N -PRESENCE OF CONTAMINANT PRESUH:D 3) J -CONCENTRATION ESi!HATED 4) U -NO,-DETECi
5) B -CONiAHl,ANi FOUND IN ASSOC!Ai:o ,l!.NK
I •• ~-
I ~
I
I
I
I
I
I ..
I
I
I
I
I
I
I --~ I =~
I
STATE OF
NORTH CAROLINA
Depmfment of Environment, Health,
and Natural Resources
Division of Solid Waste Management
SufJE'l':fiznd Section
G·&· .: . . . .
01
Johnson Controls Globe Battery
NCD 000770487
Phase II
Screening Site Inspection
Volume I
October 1991
By:
Greenhorne & O'Mara, Inc.
I
1.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
••
I
I
I
I
I
.I
I
PHASE II
SCREENING SITE INVESTIGATION
FOR THE
CERClA
JOHNSON CONTROLS, INC., GLOBE BATTERY DIVISION
WINSTON-SALEM, FORSYTH COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
NCD 000770487
Submitted to:
State of North Carolina
Department .of Environment, Health,
and Natural Resources
Division of Solid Waste Management
Superfund Section
Raleigh, North Carolina
Prepared By:
Greenhome & O'Hara, Inc.
9001 Edmonston Road
Greenbelt, Maryland 20770
October 1991
Revised February 1992
1
I
•• I
I
I
I
I
I
I
•• I
I
I
I
I
I !
' I
••
II
TABLE OF CONTENTS
EXECUTIVE SUHKAl!.Y
1.0 INTRODUCTION
1. 1 OBJECTIVES
1.2 SCOPE OF VORK
2.0 SITE CHARACTERIZATION
2.1 SITE BACKGROUND AND HISTORY
2.2 SITE DESCRIPTION
2.2.1 Site Location
2.2.2 Site Features
2.2.3 Waste Characteristics
3.0 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING
3.1 TOPOGRAPHY
3.2 SURFACE VATER ..
3.2.1 Overland Drainage
3.2.2 Climatology
3.3 GROUNDWATER ....
3.3.1 Bydrogeology
3.3.2 Aquifer Use
3.3.3 Soils
3.4 VATER SUPPLY
3.5 POPULATION DISTRIBUTION
3.6 LAND USE ...... .
3.7 SENSITIVE ENVIRONMENTS
4.0 FIELD INVESTIGATION ....
4.1 DESCRIPTION OF SAMPLES AND SAMPLE LOCATIONS
4.2 FIELD MEASUREMENTS
4.3 ANALYTICAL RESULTS ..
5.0 RECOMMENDATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS
REFERENCES
APPENDIX A
APPENDIX B
APPENDIX C
MAPS AND TABLES
SITE INSPECTION FORM
ANALYTICAL DATA
i
ii
1
1
1
3
3
4
4
4
5
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
7
7
8
9
9
10
10
11
11
13
I
•• I
I
I
I
I
I
I
•• I
I
I
I
I
I
I
••
I
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The Johnson Controls, Inc., Globe Battery site is located on old
Greensboro Road in a rural area east of llinston-Salem,
North Carolina. The plant was constructed in 1978
batteries, primarily for automobiles. Prior to 1978,
reportedly undeveloped.
Forsyth County,
to manufacture
the site was
Batteries are both assembled and charged at the site. Plant production
was estimated at 6,000 to 11,000 batteries per day during 1984. Raw
materials used in the construction of the batteries include pig lead, lead
oxide, barium sulphate, carbon black, and sulfuric acid. llaste generated
consists of lead sludge, lead dust from a dry-air cleaning device, barium
(in the form of barium sulphate), and paper trash contaminated with lead
dust. These wastes are currently hauled off-site; however, disposal
practices prior to 1980 are not well documented. During the plant's
operation, several incidents have been documented involving the release of
hazardous materials. Before modifications to the plant's ventilation
system, lead may have been released into the environment during filter bag
changes. Approximately 3,000 gallons of sulfuric acid was spilled in 1979
while a tank was being filled, and an unknown amount of sulfuric acid was
spilled in 1982. One of the two acid spills reportedly reached a nearby
pond.
The site is located in the Piedmont Physiographic Province and
hydrogeologic regime of north-central Carolina. This regime is
characterized by thick regolith over fractured igneous and metamorphic
rock. The bedrock consists of mica gneisses and schist with lesser amounts
of hornblende gneisses. The unconfined residual soil/crystalline rock
aquifer forms the principle aquifer in the area. Soils on the site consist
of the Cecil, Madison, and Pacolet series.
The site is located near the top of a small hill, that gently slopes to
the northwest toward Lowery Creek. The site drains to a drainage swale
system which leads to three sedimentation basins. These basins are located
along the western side of the property and outside of the facility fence.
Lowery Creek flows into Salem Lake. Approximately 72,028 people receive
water from a Winston-Salem/Forsyth County municipal water system water
intake on Salem Lake, downstream of the Johnson Controls site. The City of
Kernersville purchases water from the Winston-Salem/Forsyth County
municipal water system. The City of llalkertown serves approximately 1,270
people from four wells located between 3 and 4 miles from the site.
Approximately 1,165 people within the 4-mile study area are dependent on
private wells for potable water. Total air population for the 4-mile study
area is approximately 19,377 people.
On May 22, 1984, the North Carolina Department of Human Resources
(NCDHR) completed a Preliminary Assessment (PA) of the site. Results
indicated that no further action was required regarding additional site
investigation. On September 12, 1990, the NUS Corporation completed a
Phase I Screening Site Inspection (SSI). The site was reinvestigated due
to regulatory changes in the Hazard Ranking System (HRS). NUS recommended
that the site progress to the Phase II SSI stage of the pre-remedial
process on a medium priority basis. On May 9, 1991, Greenhorne & O'Hara,
Inc. under contract with NCDEHNR, conducted a Phase II SSI. The
investigation involved the collection and analysis of nine (9)
ii
i
' I
•• I
I
I
I
I
I
I
•• I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
environmental samples at the site. Results of the sampling event indicated
that a release has occurred on the site. Those affected by contamination
could include on-site workers who come into contact with surface soils,
2,435 people who rely on groundwater as their sole source for drinking
water, 72,028 people who rely on water from the Salem Lake surface water
intake, and those who fish along Salem Lake. If a release to air occurred,
19,783 people could be affected. Due to the fact that there is
quantitative evidence of soil, surface water and sediment contamination and
qualitative evidence of air and surface water contamination, G&O is
recommending that the Johnson Controls, Globe Battery Division site,
progress to the next phase of the pre-remedial process.
iii
I
I
I
, ••
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
•• I
I
I
I
I
I i ' I '
I
1.0 INTRODUCTION
1.1 OBJECTIVES
Greenhorne and O'Hara, Inc. (G&O) conducted a Phase II Screening Site
Inspection (SSI) at the Johnson Controls, Globe Battery site located in the
rural outskirts of Winston-Salem, Forsyth County, North Carolina. The
overall objective of the Phase II SSI is to provide information to
determine whether a site should move onto the next · stage of the pre-
remedial process or be designated as "no further remedial action planned
(NFRAP)" under the Federal Superfund program. Additional objectives of the
Phase II SSI are the following:
0 Identify the types of contaminants present.
O Assess whether a release of hazardous substances has occurred;
O Search for evidence of actual human and environmental exposure to
contaminants.
0 Determine the likelihood of the site scoring high enough on the
HRS to be recommended for further pre-remedial action under the
Federal Superfund program.
The SSI builds upon data obtained during the preliminary assessment
(PA) and Phase ISSI stages to further characterize problems at or near the
site and to support a management recommendation.
1.2 SCOPE OF WORK
The scope of work for the Phase II SSI includes the following tasks:
O Reviewing both EPA and state file material.
0
0
0
Preparing an abbreviated site-specific sampling plan and Health
and Safety Plan. This task included developing a site map to
illustrate proposed sampling locations, the approximate number of
samples, and the type of samples to be collected.
Conducting a site reconnaissance with the NCDEHNR to determine and
flag actual sampling locations based on the sampling plan and
existing field conditions, and the professional judgement of the
NCDEHNR and the G&O sampling team. During the site
reconnaissance, G&O also developed a site layout map to illustrate
all of the important site features including location of
buildings. access roads, and waste source areas, as well as s.ite
drainage.
Performing field sampling activities by collecting up to five (5)
environmental media samples and three (3) QA/QC samples. The five
environmental samples usually included two (2) groundwater samples
(with a maximum well depth of 15 feet) and three (3) surface soil
samples. The three (3) QA/QC samples included one (1) water
duplicate, one (1) surface soil duplicate, and one (1) trip blank.
l
I
•• I
I
I
I
I
I
I
•• I
I
I
I
I
I
I
••
I
0
0
Analyzing laboratory data and presenting the data in four summary
tables: volatile organic compounds, semi-volatile organic
compounds, inorganic compounds, and pesticides/PCBs. Any releases
that were observed were highlighted on the tables and discussed in
the Phase II SSI report.
Preparing a Phase II SSI report that presents information gathered
during the site visit, field observations, and laboratory data
with respect to observed releases. Any existing data gaps will be
discussed in the text. Greenhome and O'Hara was not contracted
to collect additional background information.
2
1
I
•• I
I
I
I
I
I
I
•• I
I
I
I
I
I
I
••
I
2.0 SITE CIIARACTERIZATIOH
2.1 SITE BACKGROUHD AHD HISTORY
The Johnson Controls, Inc., Globe Battery Division began operations in
1978. Prior to that time, the site was undeveloped. Facility operations
involve the assembly and electrical charging of lead-acid batteries,
primarily for the automobile industry (Ref. 1). In 1984, the plant
produced 6,000 to 11,000 batteries per day. Raw materials used in the
construction of the batteries include pig lead, lead oxide, barium
sulphate, carbon black and sulfuric acid. A typical battery contains about
21 pounds of lead and lead oxide (Ref. 2).
Several incidents are on record involving the release of hazardous
materials at the site. Before modifications to the plant's ventilation
system, lead may have been released into the environment during filter bag
changes. In 1979, 3,000 gallons of sulfuric acid were spilled while a tank
was being filled from a railroad car. Most of the spill was contained in a
moat. The acid was neutralized with lime and drummed for shipment to a
certified landfill (Refs. 3, 4). A second spill of sulfuric acid, in 1982,
was also controlled by a spill containment basin. The acid was pumped into
drums and sold or given to a local company for the production of iron
sulfate liquor (Ref. 5). Remaining acid was neutralized with lime or
limestone. Johnson Controls reported in 1984 that they were unsure where
this material was disposed. According to the Forsyth County Health
Department, one of the two acid spills reached a nearby pond that drains
into Salem Lake (Ref. 6).
Plant officials told G&O, on June 25, 1991, that two underground
storage tanks (USTs), one containing #2 diesel fuel and the other
containing waste oil, would soon be removed from the site. A third UST,
containing gasoline, was removed three to four years ago. These tanks were
never used for non-petroleum products (Ref. 4).
In August of 1980, Johnson Controls, Globe Battery Division submitted a
RCRA Part A Application to the EPA, automatically listing it as a potential
hazardous waste site on the Comprehensive Environmental Response
Compensation Liability Information System (CERCLIS) (Refs. 1, 2). On
October 8, 1981, the site was withdrawn from the EPA's active permits file
to the facility notification file, indicating that the site was no longer
involved with treatment, storage or on-site disposal activities and was
only listed as a generator (Ref. 7). On November 9, 1981, the site was
reactivated, identifying the site as a generator and storer of hazardous
waste (Ref. 8). On December 2, 1981, a RCRA Interim Status Inspection was
conducted by the North Carolina Solid and Hazardous Waste Management
Branch. The facility was sighted for failure to maintain personnel
training records and job descriptions and failure to adopt an emergency
contingency plan (Ref. 9). Surface water runoff was noted as a concern
during an Interim Status Inspection in December 1984 (Ref. 10). Johnson
Controls submitted a RCRA Part B permit in 1984 to apply for permission to
construct a hazardous waste storage area (Ref. 2). This application was
later withdrawn by Johnson Controls as they decided to establish an
alternate means to dispose of wastes at the facility and no longer intended
to store hazardous waste on the site for more than 90 days (Ref. 11).
3
I
•• I
I
I
D
I
I
I
•• I
I
I
I
I
I
On May 22, 1984 the NCDEHNR conducted a Preliminary Assessment (PA) of
the facility in accordance with standard procedures for the investigation
and assessment process of all CERCLIS sites. No further action was
recommended regarding further investigations of the facility (Ref. 12).
Due to regulatory requirements for the revision of the Hazard Ranking
System (HRS), the site was reinvestigated on September 12, 1990 by NUS
Corporation (Ref. 6). The investigation consisted of a Phase ISSI of the
site and included a review of EPA and state file material, completion of a
target survey, and an off-site reconnaissance of the facility and
surrounding area. The study recommended that the site progress to the
Phase II SSI stage of the pre-remedial process on a medium priority basis
(Ref. 10).
2.2 SITE DESCRIPTION
2.2.1 Site Location
The Johnson Controls, Globe Battery facility is located in the rural
outskirts of Winston-Salem, Forsyth County off of Old Greensboro Road
(Appendix A, Figure 1). The site can be found on the Winston-Salem East,
North Carolina USGS Quadrangle Map at latitude 36° 07' 009' and longitude
so0 09' 040" (Ref. 13)
2.2.2 Site Features
The 63-acre site includes a manufacturing building with administrative
offices (Refs. 4, 14). During a site reconnaissance by Greenhorne &
O'Hara, Inc. in May 1991, it was noted that materials, such as plastic
battery cases, aluminum flake paste, battery terminals, 55-gallon drums of
petroleum-based lubricants and broken plastic battery parts, are stored on
the southeast corner of the site. Railroad tracks run adjacent to the
southeastern corner of the site and a spur runs into the site (See Appendix
A, Figure 2).
Sulfuric acid is stored in a diked, above-ground storage tank facility
adjacent to the east side of the manufacturing building at the end of the
railroad spur. The area is designed to unload materials from both railroad
and truck mounted tanks. The area appeared to be in good condition with
adequate spill prevention/control measures and no visual evidence of any
spillage or leakage (Ref. 4).
No groundwater monitoring wells were observed or reported on the site.
Three sedimentation basins collect runoff from the site. These basins are
located along the western side of the property and outside of the facility
fence. No information· is available as to the size or construction of the
basins.
Materials on the outside of the plant appeared to be properly stored
with the exception of several unmarked full or partially full 55-gallon
drums, assumed to be lubricating fluids, and 35-gallon drums of aluminum
flake paste. The drums were stored on the edge of the asphalt surface and
adjacent soil surface with no diking system. Several empty drums of
aluminum flake paste were observed to be open and lying on their side,
spilling residual aluminum flakes onto the ground. A unusual sweet odor
was noticed in this area, apparently emanating from the aluminum flake
4
j
I
•• I
I
I
g
n
n
D
I
I
I
I
I
I
••
I
paste. The asphalt parking lot/storage area slopes from the drum area,
northwest to a storm drain, located adjacent to the building (Ref. 4).
Four above ground propane tanks are located on top of a fenced-in berm
on the southwest corner of the site. Immediately to the west is a drainage
swale system that collects surface water runoff from the site, directing it
one of three sedimentation basins on the site (Ref. 4).
The portion of the property containing the manufacturing building and
waste storage areas is completely fenced with a guard house at the main
entrance (Refs. 4, 26). However, the property line extends beyond the
fenced area and the sedimentation basins are outside of the fencing.
2.2.3 Vaste Characteristics
According to a RCRA Part B Permit Application for Johnson Controls,
lead and other particulate matter are generated during the production
process. These particulates are collected by a ventilation collector
system. Fabric filters are used to control emissions in some processes.
Vet scrubbers are used in casting, paste mixing, remelt and salvaging
operations (Ref. 2). Wastes produced at the site include dust from the dry
air cleaning devices, lead-containing sludge from wet scrubbers for air
cleaning, lead-containing sludge from the pre-treatment facility for waste
water and trash described as hazardous waste based on extraction process
toxicity (paper towels, gloves, floor sweepings, etc.) (Ref. 5). The
materials are hauled off-site to a lead smelter for recovery of the lead.
According to the Part A Hazardous Waste Permit application filed by Johnson
Controls in 1981, waste produced at the site included barium in the form of
barium sulphate. Total lead waste, in 1981, was approximately 122,000
pounds; total barium waste was approximately 400 pounds (Ref. 1).
Wastewater, produced from the dewatering of the lead paste sludge, is
treated at the facility before it is discharged into the stormwater sewer
system (Ref. 4). According to the Part A Hazardous Waste Permit
application, the site has a permit •for domestic and for industrial waste
water" (Ref. 1). It is unknown whether this permit regulates the treatment
or discharge of wastewater.
Trash from the facility was disposed of in local landfills. The lead
content of this materials was considered to be extremely small. Any trash
that contained visible lead was put into drums and included with the
baghouse dust, collected from the dry air cleaning devices, for shipment to
a lead smelter (Ref. 4).
5
le
m
n
H
I
I
I
I
••
I
I
I
I
I
I
I •1•
I
3.0 EHVIRONHKIITAL SETTING
3.1 TOPOGRAPHY
The topography of the area is characterized by extensive hill and ridge
systems. The site is located near the top of a small, gently sloping hill,
that slopes to the northwest toward Lowery Creek. The slope of the site
ranges from O to 4 percent. Site elevations are highest on the southeast
corner of the site, 940± feet, and lowest on the northwest corner of the
site, 880 ± feet (Ref. 13).
3.2 SURl'ACE WATER
3.2.1 Overland Drainage
The Johnson Controls site drains to the northwest toward a drainage
swale system that runs along the western property line. The drainage swale
system flows approximately 1,000 feet to sedimentation basins and then to
an unnamed tributary to Lowery Creek. The unnamed tributary flows
approximately 1700 feet before reaching Lowery Creek. Lowery cr·eek flows
approximately 2100 feet to the southwest before intersecting Salem Lake
(Refs. 4, 13). Salem Lake is used for recreational fishing (Ref. 6). A
surface water intake is located on Salem Lake approximately 1.5 miles from
the site (Ref. 13).
3.2.2 Climatology
Forsyth County has a mild, temperate climate with an annual rainfall of
approximately 44 inches. Annual lake evaporation is approximately 40
inches (Ref. 15). Therefore, net precipitation is 4 inches. The two year,
24-hour rainfall in this area is approximately 3 inches (Ref. 16).
3.3 GROUNDWATER
3.3.1 Hydrogeology
Forsyth County lies entirely within the Piedmont Physiographic
Province, which is characterized by a thick regolith of weathered bedrock
(saprolite), with a typical thickness of 10 to 20 meters, over fractured
bedrock. Bedrock in this area typically consists of mica gneisses and
schist with lesser amounts of hornblende gneisses. Granites, pegmatite
dikes and ultramafic rocks are also found in this area (Refs. 10, 17).
3.3.2 Aquifer Use
The unconfined residual soil/crystalline rock aquifer, consisting of
crystalline igneous rock, forms the principle aquifer in the area.
Overlying soils and fractured bedrock are considered to be hydraulically
interconnected with no confining units, creating an unconfined aquifer
system. Depths to groundwater vary considerably on a local scale due to
the extensive hills and ridges that characterize the topography of the
area. The average depth to groundwater in the Piedmont Physiographic
6
I
••
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
••
I
I
I
I
I
I
Province is 36.8 feet below surface level (Refs. 10, 17). The unsaturated
zone of residual soil is the layer of lowest hydraulic conductivity;
ranging from 1 x 10-5 cm/sec to 1 x 10-3 cm/sec. Recharge to the aquifer
is by infiltration of rainwater (Ref. 18).
3.3.3 Soils
Soils on the Johnson Controls, Globe Battery site consist of the Cecil,
Madison, and Pacolet series. Soils from the Cecil series were formed in
residuum that weathered from granite, gneiss, and other acidic rocks. This
well-drained soil on uplands has a brown sandy loam surface layer,
approximately 8 inches thick. Subsoils, approximately 44 inches thick, are
red, firm clay and friable clay loam with strong brown mottles. Beneath
these layers, red weathered· rock that crushes to clay loam extends to
depths of 83 inches.
The Madison series is found on well-drained, gently sloping to steep
slopes on uplands. The soils are formed in residuum that weathered from
mica schist and mica gneiss. The surface layer is reddish-brown fine sandy
loam, approximately 6 inches thick. The subsoil is red, firm clay and clay
loam, approximately 28 inches thick. Extending to a depth of 58 inches,
the next layer is mottled red and yellowish-brown, partly weathered mica
gneiss and schist that crushes to sandy clay loam.
Soils from the Pacolet series are found on well-drained, gently sloping
to steep uplands. The soils are formed in residuum that weathered from
granite, mica gneiss, schist, and other acidic rocks. The surface layer,
approximately 6 inches thick, is dark yellowish-b.rown fine sandy loam. The
subsoil consists of dominantly red, firm clay and friable clay loam,
approximately 26 inches thick. Mottled red and reddish-yellow, weathered
mica gneiss that crushes to sandy clay loam extends beneath the surface and
subsoil to depths of 76 inches.
Permeability for all of the soils found on the site is moderate.
Available water capacity is medium and the shrink-swell potential is low.
The seasonal high water table is greater than 5 feet (Ref. 19).
3.4 WATER SUPPLY
The Winston-Salem/Forsyth County municipal water system combines water
from a surface water intake on Salem Lake, downstream from the Johnson
Controls site, and water from the Yadkin River (Ref. 20). The population
relying on the Salem Lake surface water intake has been apportioned to the
percentage of water the intake contributes to the entire system (Ref. 21).
The City of Kernersville purchases drinking water from the Winston-
Salem/Forsyth County municipal water system (Ref. 20).
POPULATION RELYING ON SURFACE WATER FOR POTABLE WATER
Population Served
by Entire System
180,070
Percentage of Water
Provided by Intake
40%
7
Population Served
by Salem Lake Intake
72,028
I
le
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
•• 1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I ••
I
The City of Walkertown obtains its drinking water from groundwater
wells that are located between 3 and 4 miles from the site. The municipal
system collects groundwater from four wells, each at depths of 175 feet and
deeper. The Winston-Salem/Forsyth County municipal system provides an
alternate backup source for the City of Walkertown (Ref. 22).
The population dependent on private wells for potable water was
calculated by conducting a house count from a USGS topographic map. The
number of houses was then multiplied by the 1980 census count for
persons/household in Forsyth County (Refs. 13, 21, 23). The nearest
private well is located approximately 500 feet east of the facility (Ref.
13).
POPULATION RELYING ON GROUNDWATER FOR POTABLE WATER
Private Wells
Radius Population/Radii
1/4-mile 0
1/2-mile 14
1-mile 22
2-mile 382
3-mile 514
4-mile 233
3.5 POPULATION DISTRIBUTION
Walkertown System
Population/Radii
0
0
0
0
0
1,270
Cumulative
Population
0
14
36
418
932
2,435
The total air population for the study area was calculated by adding
the number of persons dependent on private wells, the number of persons
within a 4-mile radius utilizing the Winston-Salem/Forsyth County Municipal
Water System, and the number,of persons within the study area living in the
City of Walkertown (Ref. 21).
The Winston-Salem/Forsyth County water system population was calculated
by conducting a house count of homes served by the system, yet outside the
city, from a topographic map. This number was multiplied by the 1980
census figure for the •persons per household in Forsyth County (Refs. 13,
21, 23). The population within the City of Winston-Salem was calculated by
measuring the area of the city and multiplying that area by the city
density (Refs. 13, 21, 23).
The Walkertown population within the study area was calculated by
conducting a house count from a topographic map and multiplying that figure
by the 1980 census figure for the persons per household in Forsyth County
(Refs. 13, 21, 23).
8
I
•• n
I
I
I
I
I
I
••
I
I
I
I
I
I
I ••
I
Radius
On-site
1/ 4-mile
1/2-mile
1-mile
2-mile
3-mile
4-mile
3.6 LAND USE
TOTAL AIR POPULATION
Population/Radii
406
60
62
425
2,271
5,940
10,619
Cumulative Population
406
466
528
953
3,224
9,164
19,783
Johnson Controls Inc., Globe Battery Division is located in a rural
residential, commercial/industrial and agricultural mixed use area east of
Winston-Salem. The nearest resident is located approximately 1,200 feet to
the south on Walkertown-Guthrie Road. The nearest school is located
approximately 1.75 miles from the site (Ref. 13).
3.7 SENSITIVE ENVIRONMENTS
There are no critical habitats in the study area. However, several
threatened and endangered plant species are found in Forsyth County .
Threatened plants include the bog rose (Arethosa bu)bosa l, the nestronia
(Nestronia umbe)Julal. and the yellow fringeless orchid (Platanthera
integra). Endangered plants include Small's portulaca <Portulaca smallji)
(Refs. 10, 24).
9
I
•• I
I
I
I
0
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I • I
I
4. 1
4.0 FIELD INVESTIGATION
DESCRIPTION OF SAMPLES AND SAMPLE LOCATIONS
A total of nine (9) environmental samples were collected to
characterize the site. To determine whether a release of a
contaminant has occurred, limited subiurface and surficial
investigation was recommended to obtain soil, groundwater,
surface water, and sediment samples for laboratory analysis. The
locations of the sampling points were originally proposed in an
abbreviated sampling plan prepared by G&O; however, the NCDEHNR
made t.he final recommendations during the sampling event
conducted on June 25, 1991. Therefore, the final sampling
locations, as shown in Appendix A, Figure 2, reflect the decision
of the NCDEHNR staff.
To determine whether contaminants were released into the
environment, three (3) surface soil samples (SSOl, S502, and
SS03) were collected. Surface soil samples SS02 and SS03 were
each composites from three locations. During the sampling
effort, groundwater was not encountered within a depth of 15,
feet. The NCDEHNR approved the collection of two (2) soil boring
samples (5B01 and SB02) in lieu of two groundwater samples
(Appendix A, Figure 2). A representative of the NCDEHNR
collected two (2) surface water (SWDl and SW02) and two (2)
sediment samples (SEDOl and SED02). All the samples collected on
the site were contained, preserved, and held in accordance with
the EPA Region IV Standard Operating Procedures (SOP) (Ref. 25).
The following table identifies the approximate locations at
which the samples were obtained:
TABLE 1
SAMPLE LOCATIONS
JOHNSON CONTROLS, GLOBE BATTERY DIVISION
WINSTON-SALEM, FORSYTH COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
Sample Code Location
JCSSOl
JCSS02
JCSS03
Grab background (control) surface soil sample -located
at the southeastern corner of the site, between the row
of hedges and the railroad tracks, approximately 21
feet north from the railroad tracks and 175 feet east
from the entrance road.
Composite surface soil sample -collected from three
locations adjacent to the acid storage and wastewater
aboveground storage tank facility.
Composite surface soil sample -collected at three
locations in the drum storage/loading dock a~ea on the
southeast side of the site. Composite locations
10
I/
I
•• I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I ••
I
JCSB0l
JCSB02
JCSWOl
,;cswo 2
JCSE[cOl
JCSED02
included soil adjacent to the drums of aluminum flake
paste, near the loading docks, and adjacent to the dust
collection bagging area.
Grab background (control) soil (at depth) -collected
from the same boring from which surface sample soil
JCSS0l was collected. The soil boring sample
was obtained at a depth of approximately 15.5 feet.
Grab soil sample
acid storage and
The soil boring
approximately 11
be advanced.
(at depth) -located downqradient of
wastewater above ground storage tanks.
sample was obtained at a depth of
feet as the hand auqP.r could no longer
Surface water sample -located along a tributary to
Lowery Creek, downgradient of site.
Surface water sample -located along a tributary to
Lowery Creek, downgradient of site.
Sediment sample located along a tributary to
Lowery Creek, downgradient of site.
Sediment sample -located along a tributary to Lowery
Creek, downgradient of site.
4 . 2 FIELD MEASUREMENTS
Field
collected
methods.
measurements for qroundwater samples were not
as groundwater could not be obtained by hand auger
No field measurements were conducted for soils.
4.3 ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Upon completion of the sampling event, samples were
collected for analysis to Industrial and Environmental Analysts,
Inc. (IEA) in Research Triangle Park, North Carolina (see Volume
II). Level IV Routine Analytical Service (RAS) Contract
Laboratory Program (CLP) data packages and associated narratives
were assembled for this project by IEA. At the request of EPA,
Region IV, the data will be validated by NUS in Tucker, Georgia.
The results of the sample analyses are summarized in Table 2
(Appendix Bl and discussed below.
JCSS02 -No
::his sample.
this sample.
ar:senic {3.3
detc:cted at
Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) were detected in
No Semivolatile Orqanic Compounds were detected in
Several inorganic metals were detected; however,
ppm) and calcium (980 ppm) were the only ones
significant levels (3x's above background
c:Jncentr:ations).
11
I
I
n
n
I
I
I ..
I
I
I
I
I
I
I ••
I
JCSS03 -No voes or BNAs were detected in this sample. Two
inorganic metals, calcium (1800 ppm) and lead (920 ppm) were
found in significant concentrations. Several other inorganic
metals were detected in tl1is samp~e; however, 0one was found in
concentrations significantly above background.
JCSB02 -No voes or BNAD were detected in this sample. Arsenic
( 3. 6 ppm), calcium ( 220 ppm) and lead ( 19 ppm) were the only
inorganics detected significantly above background.
JCSW02 -No voes were detected in this sample. No
detected in this sample. Lead (l.035 ppm) and barium
were detected at assumed significant concnetrations.
BNAs
( 0. 09
were
ppm)
JCSED02 -Acetone (l0J,e ppb) was the only voe detected in this
sample. Acenaphthene ( 330K ppb), fluorene ( 330K ppb),
phenanthrene ( 367 ppb), anthracene ( 330K ppb), fluoranthene ( 2167
ppb), pyrene (1700 ppb), benz[alanthracene (800 ppb), chrysene
(1733 ppb), bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (4683 ppb),
benzo[blfluoranthene (1667 ppb), benzo[a]pyrene (1650K ppb),
indeno[l,2,3-cd]pyrene (1650K ppb), dibenzo[a,h]anthracene (1650K
ppb) a11d benzo[g,h,ilperylenu were the only BNAs detected in this
sample. Chromium (45 ppm) and lead (4700 ppm) were detect.ea at
concentrations which are assumed significant .
In summary, it appears that releases of contaminants have
occurred to soils on the site. Lead was detected in the
composite soil sample collected near the drum storage/loading
dock/baghouse area on the southeast side of the site. Lead
contamination may be attributed to the assembly and electrical
charging of lead-acid batteries. Lead has been suspected of
being released to the environment during filter bag changes.
Because groundwater samples were not collected, it is not
possible to determine at this time if contamination to
groundwater has occurred. Additionally, lead was detected in
assumed significant concentrations in sediments and surface water
south of the site. The level of lead in sediments south of the
site is hazardous by definition.
I
I
a
a
I
I
I ..
I
I
I
I
I
I
I ••
I
5.0 RECOMMENDATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS
Based on the analytical results of the sampling event at the
Johnson Controls, Globe Battery Division site, the following area
appears to have had environmental releases of a hazardous
contaminant that is associated with site activities:
0
0
Soils near the drum storage/loading dock area on the
southeast side of the site appear to be contaminated
with lead.
Sediments and surface water south of the site
be contaminated with lead. The level of
sediments south of the site is hazardous
definition.
appear to
lead in
by RCRA'
Due to the fact that there appears to be quantitative
evidence of soil contamination, G&O is recommending that this
site progress to the next phase of the pre-remedial process. On-
site workers may be adversely affected by surface soils
contaminated with lead. A groundwater sample should be obtained
in order to determine if a risk exists to those individuals who
rely on groundwater for their potable water. If contamination to
sroundwater has occurred, 13,931 people may be affected. If
surface water contamination has occurred, 78,128 people utifizing
the Winston-Salem/ Forsyth county Municipal Water System may be
af::ected. Fishing along Salem Lake may also be affected. I£ a
release to air occurred, 21,484 people could be affected.
13
I
u.
0
H
I
I
I
I
•• I
I
I
I
I
I
I ••
I
LIST OF REFERENCES FOR THE JOHNSON CONTROLS, INC.,
GLOBE BATTERY DIVISION SITE
EPA ID HUHBER -NCD 000770487
1. EPA Hazardous Waste Permit Application (EPA Forms 3510-1 and 3510-3)
for Johnson Controls, Inc., Globe Battery Division, Winston-Salem,
North Carolina. Filed by Milton C. Zillis. 1981.
2. RCRA Part B Permit Application for Hazardous Waste Storage Area,
Document D-144, Johnson Controls, Inc., Globe Battery Division. 1984.
3. Nicolai, Robert F. (Johnson Controls). 1983. Letter to Mr. Frank
Moore (NCDHR) regarding Johnson Controls, Inc."s EPA Notifications of
Previous Hazardous Waste Spills dated June 8, 1981 -Winston-Salem
Facility -NCD000770487. December 8.
4. Greenhome & O'Hara, Inc. 1991. Field Notes. Site Visit to Johnson
Controls, Inc., Globe Battery Division. June 25.
5. Pegram, Mark (Johnson Controls). 1984. Letter to Mr. Frank Moore
(NCDHR) regarding pre-RCRA Hazardous Waste Disposal Activities. May 9.
6.
7 .
8.
NUS, Inc. 1990. Field Notes.
Controls Inc., Globe Battery Division
Site reconnaissance
March 28.
for Johnson
Taimi, T. Michael
(Johnson Controls)
Permit Application.
(EPA) . 1981. Letter
regarding withdrawal of
October 8.
to Mr. Robert F. Nicolai
the Part A Hazardous Waste
Thoman, Daniel P. (EPA). 1981.
Controls) regarding reactivation
permit application. November 9.
Letter to Mr. Robert Nicolai (Johnson
of file and modification of Part A
9. RCRA Inspection Report for Johnson Controls Inc., Globe Battery
Division. December 2, 1981.
10.
11.
12.
Tanner, Terry L. (NUS). 1990. Letter to Mr. A.R. Hanke (EPA)
regarding Phase I Screening Site Inspection for Johnson Controls, Inc.,
Globe Battery Division, NCD000770487. September 12.
Meyer, William L. (NCDHR).
Controls) regarding intent
May 27.
1986. Letter to Mr. Mark Pegram (Johnson
to deny hazardous waste management permit.
Potential Hazardous Waste Site Preliminary Assessment (EPA Form 2070-
120) for Johnson Controls, Inc., Globe Battery Division. Filed by O.W.
Strickland (NCDHRJ. May 22, 1984.
13. USGS 7.5' Quadrangle Maps: Belews Creek, 1969 (Photorevised 1986);
Kernersville, 1969 (Photorevised 1987); Walkertown, 1951 (Photorevised
1986); Winston-Salem East, 1959 (Photorevised 1987) .
I
a
I
I
•• I
I
n
I
D
H
u
1•
I
14. Bialas, Irene (Johnson Controls).
EPA regarding filing of the
Notification of Hazardous Wastes.
1981. Letter and attachments to the
Environmental Protection Agency
June 8.
15. U.S. Department of Commerce, Climatic At)as of the United States
(Washington, D.C.: GPO, June 1968) Reprint 1983, National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration.
16. U.S. Department of Commerce, Ra jnfajj Frequency At) as of the United
States, Technical Paper No. 40 (Washington, D.C.: GPO, 1961), p. 93.
17. Stuckey, Jasper L. and Stephen
Map of North Carolina. North
Development. Bulletin No. 71.
G. Conrad, Explanatory Text far Geologic
Carolina Department of Conservation and
1958.
18. Aller, Linda, et. al., DRASTIC: A Standardized System for Eyaluatinii
Ground Vat er Pol 1 ut ion Potent j a 1 Using Hydrogen] og ic Sett j ng s. EPA-
600 /2-87-035. 1987.
19. Zimmerman, James L. Soil Survey of Forsyth County, North Carolina.
United States Department of Agriculture Soil Conservation Service. May
1976.
20. NUS, Inc. 1988. Field Notes. Site reconnaissance for AMP Inc.
21.
October 18 .
Glynn, M. Joan (G&O). 1991.
and air populations within a
Inc., Globe Battery Division.
1992.
Population Calculations RE: Groundwater
4-mile radius of the Johnson Controls,
September 18. Revised February 14,
22. Brown, Chris (NUS). 1988. Telecon with Robert Shepherd (City of
Walkertown) RE: city water system and well locations. June 13.
23. DeRosa, Pat (NCDEHNR). 1991. Letter and attachments to Technical
Staff regarding US Census Bureau 1990 Population Data. September 16.
24. North Carolina Natural Heritage Program Element List for Forsyth
County, June 30, 1991.
zs. Environmental Compliance
Quality Assurance Manual,
1, 1991.
Branch Standard Operating Procedures and
US-EPA, Region IV, ESD, Athens, GA, February
26. Site plan for Johnson Controls -Globe Battery Division.
1"=200". Date unknown.
Scale-
27. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office Of
"Drinking Water Regulations and Health Advisories."
November 1990.
Drinking Water.
Washington, D.C.
I
1.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I APPENDIX A
MAPS AND TABLES ..
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1•
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I ..
I
I
I
I
;I
I
I ••
I
JOHNSON CONTROL, INC. -GLOBE BATTERY
FIGURE 1
UGIIIHRS • UCHIIICIS • P'\A"IIIAS • SCl!~IISIS • SllMTOIIS • '1IOIOGRAWMIIRIS1S
GREENHORNE & O'MARA, INC.
9001 Ect.O,ISTON ROAD. GREENBELT. MARYlANO 20TT0 SITE LOCATION
, 13011 962-2800 '
..... ••••••~ .....,;,'"'"'" <,•••U'""'' CO•ll•l1-.._,,c;,_,.,-,.,.,, v••Ul~l!IU ,;, NCO 000 770 487
t •P•,"' ••· ,.,,.,,, ......... ss,~ •••"'''""' ...;,,.,;,c,~ul ~. ,,,.,.., ,,
' I SOURCE: North Carolina Department of Transportation, County Road Maps, 1990.
I I
I
D
I
I
I
I
I
••
I
I
I
I
1•
I
I
0
STORAGE
BUILDING
DUST
COLLECTION
AREA
PROPERTY LINE S502
S802
I
I
L
250'
SPLASH
PAD
ABOVE GROUllli
S TORI\GE T /1/lK
LOADING ANO TRUCK
STORAGE AREA
TRUCK
MAINT.O
/ )-._ SEOIMEHTATl~N SPILLWAY~( . ....,/ BASINS .
o SPLASH PAD
----\ ~SPILLWAY
c<• ~ ' I
JOHNSON CONTROL, INC.
500' FEET CONTOUR INTERVAL 10 FEET
It. lNGlNUIIS • .lltCHttlCTS • ,u,.,1111s • SCl(IIJISIS • Sl.llVOOIIS • PMOIOCUMMIIIIISIS
. GREENHORNE & O'MARA, INC.
' 9001 E0MONSTON ROAD. GREENBB.T. MARYLAND 20770
13011 982-2100
:, '"l>ll~lll.11 t.lU•lllAN!& hi• Al-"'M• CO •ULINC1'11 ~ 101 Jlf"'• VI •IIIU!I• ,,1 ,,~,.,, ,o,,,_u v,,.,,,.•n•! v••~.._..,,.,..,_,11oc•-.0U ..,.,,,,..,, ,,
SOURCE: USGS Topographic Map, Winston-Salem , N.C.
◊
◊
SPLASH PAO 0 f'\ SEDIMENT A TJ0N G BASIN
~ SPILLWAY \
PROPERTY UHE ...... -
____ _>
Scale in feet
a 200
GLOBE BATTERY
FIGURE 2
SITE LAYOUT
SAMPLING POINTS
NCO 000 770 487
-- -- - - - - -I - --•
Physical Waste
State Characteristics•
Gas A,0,G, I
Gas A,O,G, I
Gas A,D,G, I
Gas A,D,G, I
Liquid A,D,H, I
Liquid E,H, l,A
Liquid A,H,I
Liquid A,D,G, I
Liquid A,D,H,G
Liquid A,D,G
Liquid A,O
Liquid A,D,G
Liquid A,E,G
Liquid A,D
TABLE 2
SUMHARY OF CHEHICAL ANALYSES FOR
THE JOHNSON CONTROLS -GLOBE BATTERY SITE
NCD000770487
SAHPLE IDENTIFICATION
Sample Collection Information
and Parameters
Background
Date Collected
Laboratory
Well Depth (Feet)
G&O Sample ID No.
EPA Case No.
Case No.
Category Compounds Detected
VOLATILE ORGANICS
Matrix
occ
occ
occ
occ
SOL
SOL
SOL
SOL
SOL
SOL
SOL
SOL
SOL
Level
% Hoisture
Concentration Units
chloromethane
bromomethane
vinyl chloride
chloroethane
methylene chloride
acetone
carbon disulfide
1,1-dichloroethene
1,1-dichloroethane
1,2-dichloroethene
chloroform
1,2-dichloroethane
2-butanone ("EK)
(total)
SOL 1,1,1-trichloroethane
Trip Blank
6/25/91
!EA
NA
JCT801
A3301
1401-033
Water
Low
100
ug/l
Surface
6/25/91
!EA
NA
JCSS01
.A3302
1041-033
Soil
Low
10
ug/kg
Soil
Acid
Storage Area
Surface Soi L
Composite
6/25/91
!EA
NA
JCSS02
A3303
1041-033
Soil
Low
13
ug/kg
--
Drum Storage/
Loading Dock
Surface Soil
Composite
6/25/19
!EA
NA
JCSS03
A3304
1041-033
Soil
Low
10
ug/kg
--.-
Background
Soil Boring
6/25/91
!EA
NA
JCS801
A3305
1041-033
Soil
Low
10
ug/kg
Acid
Storage Area
Soil Boring
6/25/91
!EA
NA
JCS802
A3306
1401-033
Soil
Low
15
ugfkg
-
--== 1111111 -lllil lili liiiii iiii I - --•
Physical Maste
State
Liquid
Liquid
Liquid
Liquid
Liquid
Liquid
Liquid
Liquid
Liquid
Liquid
Liquid
Liquid
p
Liquid
Liquid
Liquid
Liquid
Liquid
Liquid
Liquid
Characteristics•
A,O
A,O,G
A,O
A,D,G
A,O,G
A,O,G,B
A,D
A,D
A,G
A,O,G
A,D
A,E,G
A,E,G
A,0
A,G,E
A,O,E
A,O,G
A,G
A,D,G
A,G
TABLE Z
SUMMARY OF CHEMICAL ANALYSES FOR
THE JOHNSON CONTROLS -GLOBE BATTERY SITE
NC0000770487
SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION
Sample Collection Information
and Parameters
Category VOLATILE ORGANICS (CONT.)
SOL carbon tetrachloride
SOL vinyl acetate
CCC bromodichloromethane
SOL 1,Z-dichloropropane
SOL cis-1,3-dichloropropene
SOL trichloroethene
CCC dibromochloromethane
SOL 1,1,2~trichloroethane
SOL benzene
SOL trans-1,3-dichloropropene
SOL bromoform
SOL 4-methyl-2-pentanone
SOL 2-hexanone
SOL tetrachloroethene
SOL toluene
SOL 1,1,2,2-tetrechloroethane
SOL chlorobenzene
SOL ethyl benzene
ace styrene
SOL xylenes {total)
Trip Blank
Tentatively Identified Compounds
unknown (Total)
cyclotetrasiloxane, octameth 5YJN
ethane,1,1,2-trichloro-1,2,2
Background
Surface Soil
Acid
Storage Area
Surface Soil
Composite
- ---.--
Drum Storage/
Loading Dock Acid
Surface Soil Background Storage Area
Composite Soil Boring Soil Boring
29JN
--- - ---lili iilii I lliiiiil • TABLE 2
SUHHARY OF CHEMICAL ANALYSES FOR
THE JOHNSON CONTROLS -GLOBE BATTERY SITE
NC0000770487
SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION
Sample Collection Information Background
and Perameters Trip Blank Surface Soil
SEHJVOLATJLE ORGANICS
Matrix NA Soil
Level NA Low
Physical Yaste X "oisture NA 10
State Characteristics* Category Concentration Units NA ug/kg
S, thick1 A,B,E occ phenol NA
Liquid A,D,B occ bis(2-chloroethyl)ether NA
Liquid A,D,B occ 2-chlorophenol NA
Liquid A,D,H SOL 1,3-dichlorobenzene NA
Sol id A,D,H occ 1,4-dichlorobenzene NA
Liquid A,D,H SOL benzyl elcohol NA
Liquid A,D,H occ 1,2-dichlorobenzene NA
Liquid A,B CCC 2-methylphenol NA
A,D occ bis(Z-chloroisopropyl)ether NA
Liquid A,B CCC 4-methylphenol NA
A occ n-nitroso-di-n-dipropylamine NA
Sol id A,D occ hexachloroethane NA
Liquid A,D occ nitrobenzene NA
Liquid A,D occ isophorone NA
Solid A,D occ 2-nitrophenol NA
Sol id A,B occ 2,4-di ■ethylphenol NA
Solid A occ bcnzoic acid NA
A,O occ bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane NA
Liquid A,D occ 2,4-dichlorophenol NA
Liquid A,D occ 1,2,4-trichlorobenzene NA
Sol id A occ naphthalene NA
Sol id A,D occ 4-chloroaniline NA
Liquid A,D,B occ hexechlorobutadiene NA
Acid Drum Storage/
Storage Area Loading Dock
Surface Soil Sur face Soil
Composite Composite
Soil Soil
Low Low
13 10
ug/kg ug/kg
==
Background
Soil Boring
Soil
Low
10
ug/kg
Acid
Storage Area
Soil Boring
Soil
Low
15
ug/kg
-
Physical
State
Sol id
Liquid
Liquid
Sol id
Sol id
Liquid
Solid
Liquid
Sol id
Sol id
Sol id
Sol id
Sol id
Sol id
Sol id
Sol id
Liquid
Sol id
Sol id
Sol id
Sol id
Liquid
Solid
Sol id
Sol id
-.-- - - ---I - - -
IJaste
Characteristics* Category
A,D occ
A,D occ
A,D,B occ
A,D occ
A,D occ
A,D occ
A,D occ
A,D occ
A,D occ
A,D occ
A,D occ
A,D occ
A,0,G occ
A,D occ
A,D occ
A,D occ
A,D occ
A,D occ
A,D occ
A,O,E occ
A,D occ
A,D occ
A,D occ
A,D DCC
A,D occ
A,D occ
TABLE 2
SUHHARY OF CHEMICAL ANALYSES FOR
THE JOHNSON CONTROLS -GLOBE BATTERY SITE
NCD0007704B7
SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION
Sample Collection Information
and Parameters
SEHIVOLATILE ORGANICS (CONT.)
4-chloro-3-methylphenol
2-methylnaphthalene
hexachlorocyclopentadiene
2,4,6-trichlorophenol
2,4,5-trichlorophenol
2-chloronephthalene
2-nitroanil ine
dimethylphthalate
ecenaphthylene
2,6-dinitrotoluene
3-nitroanil ine
acenaphthene
2,4-dinitrophenol
4-nitrophenol
dibenzofuran
2,4-dinitrotoluene
diethylphthalate
4-chlorophenyl-Phenylether
fluorene
4-nitroaniline
4,6-dinitro-2-methylphenol
n-nitrosodiphenylemine
4-bromophenyl-phenylether
hexachlorobenzene
pentechlorophenol
phenanthrene
Trip Blank
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Background
Surface Soil
Acid
Storage Area
Surface Soil
Composite
- - --.-
Drum Storage/
Loading Dock Acid
Surface Soil Background Storage Area
Composite Soil Boring Soil Boring
- - -• - - -- - -I - --l!!!l!!I ---.-m'lll
TABLE 2
SUHHARY OF CHEMICAL ANALYSES FOR
THE JOHNSON CONTROLS -GLOBE BATTERY SITE
NC0000770487
SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION
Acid Drum Storage/
Storage Area Loading Dock Acid
Sample Collection tnformat ion Background Surface Soil Sur face Soil Background Storage Area
end Parameters Trip Blank Sur face Soil Composite Composite Soil Boring Soil Boring
Physical Waste
State Characteristics• Category SEHIVOLATJLE ORGANICS (CONT.)
Solid A,O CCC anthracene NA
Liquid A,O CCC di-n-butylphthalate NA
Solid A,O CCC fluoranthene NA
Solid A,O CCC pyrene NA
Liquid A,D CCC butylbenzylphthalate NA
A,D CCC 3,3-dichlorobenzidine NA
Sol id A,D CCC benzo[a)anthracene NA
Solid A,D CCC chrysene NA
Liquid A,D CCC bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate NA
Liquid A,D CCC di-n-octylphthalate NA
Solid A,D CCC benzo[b]fluoranthene NA
Sol id A,D CCC benzo[k]fluoranthene NA
Sol id A,O,K,L CCC benzo(a]pyrene NA
Sol id A,D CCC indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene NA
Solid A,D CCC dibenz(a,h]anthracene NA
Solid A,D CCC benzo(g,h,i]perylene NA
Tentatively Identified
Compounds
Unknown (Total) 790BJN 1300BJN 20740BJN 280BJN 410BJN
1782JN 2000JN 21840JN 330JN 580JN
halogenated ethane 98JN 1300JN 100JN
octane,3-methyl 220BJN 160BJN 230BJN 170BJN
substituted benzene 790BJN SSOBJN 710BJN 510BJN
benzoic acid 76JN 120JN
hexanedioic ecid,dioctyl es 21000JN 12000JN
-- - - - -- - -I -- - ----.-Ill!!:! • TABLE 2
SUHHARY OF CHEHICAL ANALYSES FOR
THE JOHNSON CONTROLS· GLOBE BATTERY SITE
NCD000770487
SAHPLE !OENTIFICAT!ON
Acid Drum Storage/
Storage Area Loading Dock Acid
Sample Collection Information Background Surface Soi L Surface Soil Background Storage Area
and Parameters Trip Blank Surface Soil Composite Composite Soil Boring Soil Boring
PESTICIDESjPCBs
Matrix NA NA NA NA NA NA
Level NA NA NA NA NA NA.
Physical 1,/aste X Moisture NA NA NA NA NA NA
State Characteristics* Category Concentration Units NA NA NA NA NA NA
Sol id A,O PSO alpha BHC NA NA NA NA NA NA
Solid A,O PSO beta BHC NA NA NA NA NA NA
Sol id A,D PSD del te BHC NA NA NA NA NA NA
Sol id A,O PSD gamma BHC (Lindane) NA NA NA NA NA NA
Sol id A,O PSO Heptechlor NA NA NA NA NA NA Sol id A,O PSD Aldrin NA NA NA NA NA NA Sol id A,D PSD Heptachlor epoxide NA NA NA NA NA NA Sol id A,O PSD Endosul fen NA NA NA NA NA NA Sol id A,0,E PSD Dieldrin NA NA NA NA NA NA Sol id A,O PSD 4,4'-DDE NA NA NA NA NA NA Sol id A,D PSO Endrin NA NA NA NA · NA NA Sol id A,O PSD Endosul fen II NA NA NA NA NA NA Sol id A,D PSD 4,4'-000 NA NA NA NA NA NA Sol id A,D PSD Endosulfen sut fate NA NA NA NA NA NA Sol id A,O PSD 4,4'-DDT NA NA NA NA NA NA Sol id A,O PSO Hethoxychlor (Hariate) NA NA NA NA NA NA Sol id A,O PSD Endrin ketone NA NA NA NA NA NA Sol id A,O PSO alpha Chlordane NA NA NA NA NA NA Sol id A,D PSO gamma Chlordane NA NA NA NA NA NA Sol id A,D PSO Toxaphene NA NA. NA NA NA NA
-
Physical
State
Liquid
Liquid
Liquid
Liquid
Liquid
Liquid
Liquid
-- - ---- -,, ---• TABLE 2
SUMMARY OF CHEMICAL ANALYSES FOR
THE JOHNSON CONTROLS -GLOBE BATTERY SITE
IJeste
Characteristics* Category
A,D occ
A,0 occ
A,O occ
A,D occ
A,0 occ
A,O occ
A,D occ
NC0000770487
SA"PLE IDENTIFICATION
Sample Collection Information
and Parameters
PESTICIDES/PCBS (CONT.)
Aroclor 1016
Aroclor 1221
Aroclor 1232
Aroclor 1242
Aroclor 1248
Aroclor 1254
Aroclor 1260
Trip Blank
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Acid
Storage Area
Background Surface Soil
Surface Soil Composite
NA NA
NA NA
NA NA
NA NA
NA NA
NA NA
NA NA
----.-1!111!!!
Orum Storage/
Loading Dock Acid
Surface Soil Background Storage Area
Composite Soil Boring Soil Boring
NA NA NA
NA NA NA
NA NA NA
NA NA NA
NA NA NA
NA NA NA
NA NA NA
I
•• I
iABL.::
..:GfNEO~ CDNTF..>~~'.:/1~~0tE 2f.":::.:::
:'·iD :)1)0 77,:1 ;.37
<3-7(•(1
(1, 01)5-~' 7:,:
<O.:-~.:
,j. 01-:
,) '::i:-:::.
'.7-5t)(:
o.-31u.;
~;)!,:
t ,:
1:A -~/0:" .~NAL YEJ
]:31)(.ri)
7
3,7
: . 2u: :c,:,u
(,. ~6L
: 2()
O.E.:
_,
so
5.2U
I
I
I
I
2) N -~-.:_,:.::N-:~ Q.=-(CiNl?/INA1'·;T ?~'ESU~.:U
I ••
I
i 7()1)(1
=, .;u
!.· ... :
. -• 'C
.:.i:}(j
.;000
1), 24U
', lUj
1 ~r)U
(1.U~
46!JOG
~OU
t2:)
I) .. ~ 7
17
21
.:_2(:;_::
; : (,
~. 21J J
1(H)LI
!U
.. --•
Physical Waste
State Characteristics*
Gas A,D,G, I
Gas A,D,G, I
Gas A,D,G, I
Gas A,D,G, I
Liquid A,D,H, I
Liquid E,H, I ,A
Liquid A,H,I
Liquid A,D,G, I
Liquid A,D,H,G
Liquid A,D,G
Liquid A,D
Liquid A,D,G
Liquid A,E,G
Liquid A,D
liiiiiil lliill --I ---
Category
occ
occ
occ
occ
SOL
SOL
SOL
SOL
SOL
SOL
SOL
SOL
SOL
SOL
TABLE 3
SUMMARY OF CHEMICAL ANALYSES FOR
THE JOHNSON CONTROLS -GLOBE BATTERY SITE
NCD 000770487
SAKPLE IDENTIFICATION
Analyzed at the North Carolina State Laboratory of Public Hea
Sample Collection Information
and Parameters
Surface Water
Sediment Sample Sediment Sample Sample
North of Site South of Site North of Site
Date Collected 6/25/91 6/25/91 6/25/91
Laboratory State Lab State Lab State Lab
G&O Sample ID No. JCSED01 JCSED02 JCSW01
NCDEHNR Nos. 14986/16288 14983/16286 14984/14985/
16287
Compounds Detected
VOLATILE ORGANICS
Matrix Sediment Sediment Water
Concentration Units ug/kg ug/kg ug/1
chloromethane
bromomethane
vinyl chloride
chloroethane
methylene chloride
acetone 10JC
carbon disulfide
1,1-dichloroethene
1,1-dichloroethane
1,2-dichloroethene (total)
chloroform
1,2-dichloroethane
2-butanone (11EK)
1,1,1-trichloroethane
-
Surface Water
Sample
South of Site
6/25/91
State Lab
JCSW02
14981/14982/
16285
Water
ug/1
--.--
Trip Blank
6/24/91
State Lab
JCTB02
14990
Water
ug/1
1KC
-- -•
Physical Waste
State Characteristics*
Liquid A,D
Liquid A,D,G
Liquid A,D
Liquid A,D,G
Liquid A,D,G
Liquid A,D,G,B
Liquid A,D
Liquid A,D
Liquid A,G
Liquid A,D,G
Liquid A,D
Liquid A,E,G
p A,E,G
Liquid A,D
Liquid A,G,E
Liquid A,D,E
Liquid A,D,G
Liquid A,G
Liquid A,D,G
Liquid A,G
--- -I liiiiil - -
Category
SOL
SOL
occ
SOL
SOL
SOL
occ
SOL
SOL
SOL
SOL
SOL
SOL
SOL
SOL
SOL
SOL
SOL
occ
SOL
TABLE 3
SUMMARY OF CHEMICAL ANALYSES FOR
THE JOHNSON CONTROLS -GLOBE BATTERY SITE
NCD 000770487
SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION
Analyzed at the North Carolina State Laboratory of Public Hea
Surface Water Surface Water
Sample Collection Information
and Parameters
Sediment Sample Sediment Sample Sample Sample
North of Site South of Site North of Site South of Site Trip Blank
VOLATILE ORGANICS (CONT.)
carbon tetrachloride
vinyl acetate
bromodichloromethane
1,2-dichloropropane
cis-1,3-dichloropropene
trichloroethene
dibromochloromethane
1,1,2-trichloroethane
benzene
trans-1,3-dichloropropene
bromoform
4-methyl-2-pentanone
2-hexanone
tetrachloroethene
toluene
1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane
chlorobenzene
ethylbenzene
styrene
xylenes (total)
Tentatively Identified Compounds
unknown (Total)
- - -•
State Characteristics*
S, thick1 A,B,E
Liquid A,D,B
Liquid A,D,B
Liquid A,D,H
Sol id A,D,H
Liquid A,D,H
Liquid A,D,H
Liquid A,B
A,O
Liquid A,B
A
Sol id A,O
Liquid A,D
Liquid A,D
Sol id A,D
Solid A,B
Solid A
A,D
Liquid A,D
Liquid A,D
Sol id A
Sol id A,D
Liquid A,D,B
--- - -s -TABLE 3
SUMMARY OF CHEMICAL ANALYSES FOR
THE JOHNSON CONTROLS -GLOBE BATTERY SITE
NCO 000770487
SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION
- -
Analyzed at the North Carolina State Laboratory of Public Hea
Surface Water
Sample Collection Information Sediment Sample Sediment Sample Sample
and Parameters North of Site South of Site North of Site
SEHIVOLATILE ORGANICS
Matrix Sediment Sediment Water
Category Concentration Units ug/kg ug/kg ug/l
occ phenol
occ bis(2-chloroethyl)ether
occ 2-chlorophenol
SOL 1,3-dichlorobenzene
occ 1,4-dichlorobenzene
SOL benzyl alcohol
occ 1,2-dichlorobenzene
occ 2-methylphenol
occ bis(2-chloroisopropyl)ether
occ 4-methylphenol
occ n-nitroso-di-n-dipropylamine
occ hexachloroethane
occ nitrobenzene
occ isophorone
occ 2-nitrophenol
occ 2,4-dimethylphenol
occ benzoic acid
occ bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane
occ 2,4-dichlorophenol
occ 1,2,4-trichlorobenzene
occ naphthalene
occ 4-chloroaniline
occ hexachlorobutadiene
- --.-
Surface Water
Sample
South of Site Trip Blank
Water Water
ug/l ug/l
-- -•
Physical IJaste
State Characteristics*
Solid A,O
Liquid A,O
Liquid A,O,B
Solid A,O
Sol id A,O
Liquid A,O
Sol id A,O
Liquid A,O
Sol id A,O
Solid A,O
Solid A,O
Solid A,0
Sol id A,O,G
Sol id A,O
Solid A,0
Solid A,D
Liquid A,D
A,O
Sol id rA,D
Sol id A,D,E
Solid A,O
Sol id A,O
Liquid A,O
Solid A,O
Solid A,O
Sol id A,O
- - - - - -s - - -
I!!!!!! ==
Category
occ
occ
occ
occ
occ
occ
occ
occ
occ
occ
occ
occ
occ
occ
occ
occ
occ
occ
occ
occ
occ
occ
occ
occ
occ
occ
TABLE 3
SUMMARY OF CHEMICAL ANALYSES FOR
THE JOHNSON CONTROLS -GLOBE BATTERY SITE
NCO 000770487
SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION
Analyzed at the North Carolina State Laboratory of Public Hea
Surface Water Surface Water
Sample Collection Information Sediment Sample Sediment Sample Sample Sample
and Parameters North of Site South of Site North of Site South of Site Trip Blank
SEHIVOLATILE ORGANICS (CONT.)
4-chloro-3-methylphenol
2-methylnaphthalene
hexachlo~ocyclopentadiene
2,4,6-trichlorophenol
2,4,5-trichlorophenol
2-chloronaphthalene
2-nitroani line
dimethylphthalate
acenaphthylene 330K
2,6-dinitrotoluene
3-ni troanil ine
acenaphthene
2,4-dinitrophenol
4-ni trophenol
dibenzofuran
2,4-dinitrotoluene
diethylphthalate
4-chlorophenyl-Phenylether
fluorene 330K
4-nitroaniline
4,6-dinitro-2-methylphenol
n-nitrosodiphenylamine
4-bromophenyl-phenylether
hexachlorobenzene
pentachlorophenol
phenanthrene 367
-
-- -•
Physical Waste
State Characteristics•
Sol id A.D
Liquid A,O
Sol id A,D
Solid A,O
Liquid A,D
A,D
Solid A,D
Solid A,D
Liquid A,D
Liquid A,O
Sol id A,O
Sol id A,0
Sol id A,O,K,L
Sol id A,O
Sol id A,D
Sol id A,O
- ---- -I - - - - - -
Category
CCC
CCC
CCC
CCC
CCC
CCC
CCC
CCC
CCC
CCC
CCC
CCC
CCC
CCC
CCC
occ
TABLE 3
SUMMARY OF CHEMICAL ANALYSES FOR
THE JOHNSON CONTROLS -GLOBE BATTERY SITE
NCO 000770487
SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION
Analyzed at the North Carolina State Laboratory of Public Hea
Surface Water Surface Water
Sample Collection Information
and Parameters
Sediment Sample Sediment Sample Sample Sample
North of Site South of Site North of Site South of Site Trip Blank
SEHJVOLATILE ORGANICS (CONT.)
anthracene 330K
di-n-butylphthalate
fluoranthene 2167.
pyrene 1700
butylbenzylphthalate
3,3-dichlorobenzidine
benzo[a]anthracene 800
chrysene 1783
bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate '1583
di-n-octylphthalate
benzo[b]fluoranthene 1667
benzo[k]fluoranthene
benzo[a)pyrene 1650K· indeno[1,2,3-cd)pyrene 1650K
dibenz[a,h]anthracene 1650K benzo(g,h,i)perylene 1650K Tentatively Identified
Compounds
Unknown (Total)
-.--
--.-
Physical Waste
State Characteristics*
Sol id A,D
Liquid A,D
Sol id A,D
Sol id A,D
Liquid A,D
A,D
Solid A,D
Sol id A,D
Liquid A,D
Liquid A,D
Solid A,D
Solid A,D
Sol id A,D,K,L
Solid A,D
Solid A,D
Sol id A,D
- - - - - - - - --1!11!!1 1111!11
Category
occ
occ
occ
occ
occ
occ
occ
occ
occ
occ
occ
occ
occ
occ
ace
occ
TABLE 3
SUMMARY OF CHEMICAL ANALYSES FOR
THE JOHNSON CONTROLS -GLOBE BATTERY SITE
NCO 000770487
SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION
Analyzed at the North Carolina State Laboratory of Public Hea
Surface Water Surface Water
Sample Collection Information
and Parameters
Sediment Sample Sediment Sample Sample Sample
North of Site South of Site North of Site South of Site Trip Blank
SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS (CONT.)
anthracene :330K
di-n-butylphthalate
fluoranthene 2167
pyrene 1700
butylbenzylphthalate
3,3-dichlorobenzidine
benzo[a]anthracene 800
chrysene 1783
bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate <1593
di-n-octylphthalate
benzo[b]fluoranthene 1667
benzo[k]fluoranthene
benzo[a]pyrene 1650K
indeno[1,2,3-cd)pyrene 1650K dibenz[a,h]anthracene 1650K benzo[g,h,i]perylene 1650K Tentatively Identified
Compounds
Unknown (Total)
--.-- - - -- -I - - - - - --.--TABLE 3
SUHHARY OF CHEHICAL ANALYSES FOR
THE JOHNSON CONTROLS -GLOBE BATTERY SITE
NCO 000770487
SAHPLE IDENTIFICATION
Analyzed at the North Carolina State Laboratory of Public Hea
Surface Water Surface Water
Sample Collection Information Sediment Sample Sediment Sample Sample Sample
and Parameters North of Site South of Site North of Site South of Site Trip Blank
PESTICIDES/PCBs
Matrix NA NA NA NA NA
State Characteristics* Category Concentration Units NA NA NA NA NA
Solid A,D PSD alpha BHC NA NA NA NA NA
Sol id A,D PSD beta BHC NA NA NA NA NA
Sol id A,D PSD delta BHC NA NA NA NA NA
Sol id A,D PSD gamma BHC (Lindane) NA NA NA NA NA
Solid A,D PSD Heptachlor NA NA NA NA NA
Solid A,O PSD Aldrin NA NA NA NA NA
Solid A,D PSD Heptachlor epoxide NA NA NA NA NA
Sol id A,0 PSD Endosul fan NA NA NA NA NA
Solid A,D,E PSD Dieldrin NA NA NA NA NA
Solid A,D PSO 4,4'-DDE NA NA NA NA NA
Sol id A,D PSD Endrin NA NA NA NA NA
Sol id A,D PSD Endosul fan II NA NA NA NA NA
Sol id A,D PSD 4,4'-DDD NA NA NA NA NA
Solid A,D PSD Endosulfan sulfate NA NA NA NA . NA
Solid A,D PSD 4,4'-0DT NA NA NA NA NA
Sot id A,D PSO Hethoxychlor (Hariate) NA NA NA NA NA
Sol id A,D PSD Endrin ketone NA NA NA NA NA
Solid A,D PSD alpha Chlordane NA NA NA NA NA
Solid A,D PSD gamma Chlordane NA NA NA NA NA
Solid A,D PSD Toxaphene NA NA NA NA NA
-- - - - - - -• -w, - -.. - - --.--TABLE 3
SUMMARY OF CHEMICAL ANALYSES FOR
THE JOHNSON CONTROLS.-GLOBE BATTERY SITE
NCO 000770487
SAMPLE IOENTIFICATION
Analyzed at the North Carolina State Laboratory of Puhl ic Hea
Surface Water Surface Water
Sample Collection lnformation Sediment Sample Sediment Sample Sample Sample
and Parameters North of Site South of Site North of Site South of Site Trip Blank
Physical Waste
State Characteristics* Category PESTICIOES/PCBS (CONT.)
Liquid A,O occ Aroclor 1016 NA NA NA NA NA
Liquid A,O occ Aroclor 1221 NA NA NA NA NA
Liquid A,D occ Aroclor 1232 NA NA NA NA NA
Liquid A,D occ Aroclor 1242 NA NA NA NA NA
Liquid A,D occ Aroclor 1248 NA NA NA NA NA
Liquid A,D occ Aroclor 1254 NA NA NA NA NA
Liquid A,D occ Aroclor 1260 NA NA NA NA NA
• •• m
D
I
I
I
I
I
•
I
I
I
I
I
I
I ••
I
APPENDIXB
SITE INSPECTION FORM
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
'q,EPA POTENTIAL HAZARDOUS WASTE SITE I. IOENTIFICA TION --o, SU.rt ~2 SfT£ ~ SITE INSPECTION REPORT
PART 1 • SITE LOCATION AND INSPECTION INFORMATION' NC 000770487
II. SITE NAME ANO LOCATION
Q, SITE N,t.Mf ll--O• ,_ ., .... __ .,..,_, 02 STREET. ROUTE NO. OR SPECIFIC LOCATION IOENTIFIEA
Johnson Controls,Inc., Globe Battery Div. Old Greensboro Road
oJ c1rv O• SU.TE I 05 ZIP COOE I oe COUNTY
1
,::,..........,. ,.
1
oeCOHCi
::x:oE OIST Winston-Salem NC ! 27102 Forsyth
09COOROINATfS i O 'rfPE OF OWNERSHIP re·-·-·
6 or1oe Oji 8 0 '0of0c .it X A PAIVA TE O 8. FEDERAL = C. STATE o o. couNrv -:: E. MuNtCIPAL 3 CF OTHER :J G. UNKNOWN
Ill. INSPECTION INFORMATION
0 I QATE CF INSPECTION I "SH EST HUS 03 YEARS OF OPERATION
6 I 2~, 91 X ACTIVE 1978 I ;eresent _UNKNOWN
WONT'°' OAT ~fUI G iNACTIVE BEGINNIHG YE.I.A ENOIHG YEAR
04 AGENCY PERFORMING INSPECnQN 1C11ac• .. -_,
2 A. EPA Cl 8. EPA CONTRACTOR 8 C. MUNICIPAL C D. MUMCIPAL CONTRACTOR
SE.STATE 0 F ST ATE CONTRACTOR Greenh1fT'rt'El""'& O'Mar"c G.OTMER
.. _ . ...,
0~ Cl-'!EF IN3PECTOA
William Dixon
09 OTMEi:: ,NSPECTORS
Jeffrey Tyburski
Jeffrey Suhr
Jerry Johnson
arvey Allen
Dave Lilley
: '.I SHE RE PRESENTA TtvES lNTE=IVIEWEO
Philip Meyer
Van K. Sullivan
Mark Pegram
1 7 ACCESS CiAlNEO BY 1 I TIME 01' IHSPECTlON ·Cll•c• --•I
(2. PEAMIS&ON 8:00 a.m. 0 WARRANT
IV. INFORMATION AVAILABLE FROM
I ,JI C:+iTt.CT
Harvey Allen
Oa PERSON RESPONSIBLE FOR SITE INSPECTION FOAM
Joan Glynn
EPA fl'~AM 1070.13 !7•111
'.?..
'
.. _.,_
:StJKrf/ ! 06 TITLE 07 ORGAMZ.ATION ca TE\.iP!-tOHE HO
Environmental Engineer G&O 191~782-9088 I ,o TITLE I I ORGANIZA TlOM I I 2 rEL..EPHOHf HQ
Environmental Geologist G&O 919 1782-9088
I
I Environmental Engineer G&O 1301 982-280
Registered Land Surveyor G&O ~191782-9088
··Environmental Engineer NCDEHNR 1919 733-280
NCDEHNR I 1919 733-280
1 • TITLE 1 !iAOORESS : a reLEPMQHE NO
0 lant Manager P O 8old~~02 ensboro Rd 1919 761-155 ' ;~~ -~ ".. ~ : o~c... nr, ,., ""'1 ()')
Environmental
EnQineer Same as above ' I I
Manager of I I v-,a--: ... - ---~ ........ <arne ac ~b,.,ve
I I
I I
I I
1tWEAT1<1ERCONOlflQfr,IS
Cloudy, Warm
02 Of rA0 • ...,,.,o,,--j <.J 'rf:fPH()NI NO.
NCDEHNR -Super fund Section 1919 1 733-2801
05 AGENCY oa OAGANIZA TION 07 TELEPHONE NO. oa OATE
G&O [phone] 2 i3Q I 9]
"'°"'TM 0A,T •(All
I
~9cPA POTENTIAL HAZARDOUS WASTE SITE I. IOENTIFICA TlON
SITE INSPECTION REPORT ~;Tu~\;~~~~ ;;~e: o, 7 PART 2-WASTE INFO~MATION
WASTE ST A TES, QUANTITIES, ANO.CHARACTERISTICS
PHYSICAL STATES •C/\uo-6,,..,_., 02 WASTE OUANTITV •T SITE OJ WASTE CHARACTEA1STICS ,C,.K•~,,..,._, ................... ., ....... ,~ ...
.,, 501.·0 . E SLURRY
-... , ~ ___ , . ..., ..... K" roxic .:. E: SOLUBLE 1 MIGHL' ·,CLAT1L£
X 9 "Cw::>EA ►''-ES _,: 1,.tQU10 ~::)NS _ 8 COAAQSI\IE :.; ►. INFECTIOUS J EXPLC~-..,E r: '5LUOGE G GAS !
_ C i::tAOIOACTIVE ·_: (j Ft,.AJ,O••A8LE .., AEAC'"JE
tlll.l~s __ l 2..2_~4fill __ :i PeqsisreNr : ,. -GNIT A8LE 1. !NCO..,iJlTl8LE
>A NQr .:.?PUCA8LE
:. ,J;l'-E =. -------::,,-~., I '10 OF :ii::auM~ -- -------· I
. WASTE TYPE
.l TEGQAV SUBS T AHCE NAME 0 1 ~oss AMOUNT 02 UNIT CF MEASURE! OJ COMMENTS
.:ii..W SLUDGE
OLW OILY WASTE I
SOL SOLVENTS '
050 PEST!ClOES I '
~cc OTHEFI ORGANIC CHEM1C.A.LS i
,oc I ·:-.JQFIGANIC CHEMICALS
:..co : .l.CIOS unknown
3,;.,5 3.t.SES 1 •,ss : ,e,vv MET-cs unknown I
. HAZARDOUS SU8STANCES1.s .. ...,._..,_,,., __ c.,•:c,u-=••11
· · ,:.:.TCGORY :2 SUBSU.NCE N.u,IE CJ CAS NUMBER :• STOAAGEiOISPCSAL 11,,1ETHOO ! C5 co:-.cENTRATIO'-1 :e MEASURE OF ' ::iNCENrRATIOH I MES I Lead I 7439-92-1 unknown 4700 : .... --
MES I Chromium 17440 47 3 unknown u I ---
! ' -=-!
! I
i
I i
I I '
! I
I ! '
! '
' '
l I I
b, FEEDSTOCKS ,, .. __ ,,, __ '
CATEGORY 01 FE!OSTOQOtAMf. 02CA$NUM8EFI CAIEGOAY I 01 FEEDSTOCK NAME 02 C.a.5 NUMBEFI
J :::ns ' :::os I
=:s 'OS I i
=c,s ,as i :
~I
;:os '0S I
SOURCES OF 1NFORMA TION ,c .. , .. ,_,.,., • ..., ... o IC•:• •H· ,_,_ .,. .. ,Ill. ••ootlll
I 1. State files
2 •. Field notes
~ ,o,o-'311-1"
I
I
·~EPA POTENTIAL HAZARDOUS WASTE SITE
SITE INSPECTION REPORT
PART J • DESCRIP'10N OF HAZARDOUS CONDITIONS ANO INCIDENTS
L IDENTIFICATION
01 su.rE 02 SITT; NUMSE.R
NC 000770487
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I ' I
!
ll. HAZ.AROOUS CONDITIONS ANO INCIDENTS
: t ]C -1-GrlOUNOWATEA CONTAMINATION
: J OSCl\..:L4 TIQN POTENTIALL 't AFFECTED 2,435 02 C! OSSERVEDtDATE. ----~-
04 NARRATIVE OESCrllPTIQN
lC POTENTIAL ,:J ALLEGED
Groundwater samples were not collected at this site.
depth of 15 feet below land su.rface, contain elevated
is contaminated, 2,435 people could be affected.
Soil borings, collected at a
levels of lead. If groundwater
·Jl ',XS SUAFACE WA TEA CONTAMINATION
:J POPULATION POTENTIALLY' AFFEC iED .7 2 z Q 28 02 IS OBSEAVcOIOATE . ...2:LJ'.2.1.C.Z.L..
J4 NARRATIVE DESCRIPTION
~ POTENTIAL 0 ALLEGED
NCDEHNR collected surface water and sediment samples for this site. Significant levels
of lead (greater than 3x' s above background concentrations) were found_ in· surface
water and sediments. Significant concentrations of chromium were found in sediments .
Accordina to the Forsu~h n • , •-• . no-.. " __ .,,, ~,... ........ ,.., , __ _!..!~-,1---.1, ---..t-----..!-. ' . ' ~
02 C OSSEAVEO!OATE. Kl ALLEGED )l X -: ::)NTAMINATION OF .4.u:l 19,783 I :: POTENTIAL
:J :>(::l=L:LA TIQN PQTfNTIALL 'f A.FF EC TEO 04 NAAAATIVE DESCRIPTION
Air samples were not collected at this site. However, Johnson Controls has reported
that lead oxide dust was released during the changing of the filter bags used in
ventilation bag houses. If a release to air occurred, 19,783 people could be affected.
:-1 ,: :: =IF1E.'EXPlOSIVE CONOtTIONS 02 CJ CBSEAVEO (OA TE : = POTENTIAL C: ALLEGED
-: J pCC•-'LA nON POTENnALL y AFF EC TEO ------"Jc NARRATIVE OESCAIPT!ON
NA
C! ALJ..EGEO U 1 -· i: JIAECT CONU.CT J2:.: OBSERVED !OA TE = PQT"ENTIAL
• PoPuLA nON POTENTIALLY A.F.:ECTEO 0 ◄ NAAFIIATIVE OESCAIPTJQN
I See Contamination of Soil
!
' I
I X: CONi-',MIN.&f10N OF SOIL J2 :x CBSEAVEO !O.&. TE 6/25/9] ~ POTENTIAL 0 ALLEGED
I c,
;J .:.REA POTE~T!ALL Y AFFECTEO. 63 ~4 NAAAA TIVE DESCRIPTION
! •~· .. ,
i Significant levels of lead (greater than 3x's above background concentrations) were
· found in soils on the site.
J1 ,xG JAINKINGWATERCONTAMINATION 74,463 02 0 OBSEAVEO !CATE. I = POTENTIAL :J ALLEGED
CJ POPULATION POTENTIALLY AFFECTED 04 NARRATIVE DESCRIPTION
See Groundwater Contamination and Surface Water Contamination.
a I ·= H WORKER EXPOSU~ 02 0 OBSERVED !DATE: I 0 POTENTIAL 0 Al.LEGEO
' ~J WORKERS POTENTIALLY AffECTEO 04 NARRATIVE DESCRIPTION
See Above
,: : :: , POPULATION EXPOSUREltNJUAY 02 0 OSSERVEO(OATE: I 0 POTENTIAL C ALLEGED
OJ POPULATION POTENTIAU.Y AFFECTED. ---0◄ ""'Akl1ATNE DESCRIPTION
NA
pond.
I
lW:PA POTENTIAL HAZARDOUS WASTE SITE I. IOENTJFIC.A TION
SITE INSPECTION REPORT o, sure~2 SITE ""-JM8€.R NC 000770487 PART 3 • DESCRIPTION OF HAZARDOUS CONDITIONS AND INCIDENTS ' HAZARDOUS CONDITIONS ANO INCIDENTS ,c-~u• = ~ 'JAMAGE TO "LORA 02 0 OBSERVED !OATE: I = POTENTIAL = ALLEGED ••o,ARA TIVE C:ESCFUPTIQN
I NA
.
:, ' -:;a...,aGC iQ FAUNA 02 C :JBSERVEO !DATE , ~ POTENTIAL = ALLEGED I ::·""' OESCRIPTION ,.., _ _._.,., ~ ··~···
5c,_ CCNiAMLNAnQN OF FOOD CH.IN 02 C OBSERVED (CATE: I }C: POTENTIAL C ALLEGCO ,"1.t.ARAT-·.(: ~ESCRlPTIQN
If surface water is contaminated, fishing along Salem Lake may be affected.
J 1 :_: •.1 ·.:~;S ~ .1.BLE CO!"T AINMENT OF W.lSTES 02:: ·)9SEFWEO tOATE -~ ?QTENTIAL : .&.LLEGEO ,-, •.•0•· s, • ...,.-.q_1 ,u• ... cr•-•· 1-::UC,. ,,os ?C,SSTIALL Y AFFECTED -J• N.AARATIVE DESCRIPTION
I .. ·. ::.:.Y.:.Gc ;o OFFs,re PROPer:uv 02 ---~ OBSERVED !DA re I :: POT'ENTIAL : ALLEGED .,
,...,..:..:;i::.t. n•,: ::_5eA1PT!QN
NA
·-• :•.: :.-..n,,A ":" 1QN OF SE NEAS S":'C=IM OAAINS. VvWTPs 02 :-_· S8SERVED (DATE. _ POTENTIAL :: A.LLEGED -:.a ~A.c=;.i. -:vi; :ESCP'.PTIQN
I NA I ' ·ccSG<cuN•uT><QR,ZEOOUMPING ·J2 : . DBSEFlvEQ !DATE . POTENTIAL -.i.LLEGED -~4:;:;4 -.. :_ :::SCRIPflQN
NA
<:ESCFl1PTIC.'I OF ANY OTHER KNOWN. POTENTIAi.. OR ALI.EGEO HA.ZAFIOS
I NA
a -II. TOT Al ?OPUl.A TION POTENTIALl ,-·A,FECTED: 74-463
COMMENTS
I --,. SOURCES OF !NFORMATION,c ... ,.-c-••• ... -u • J ., .... -. ·--.. , ··-••· -I 1. State files
2. Field notes
---·-----
I
I
! L IOENTIFICA TION
~4i'EPA
POTENTIAL HAZARDOUS WASTE SITE
SITE INSPECTION 01 SUTE!02S/TENUtr.l8EFI
PART 4 · PERMIT ANO DESCRIPTIVE INF OR MA TION NC D000770487
I IL ;)ERMIT INFORM.A TION . -, =e: OF P~RMlT ,ssueo I :>2 PERMIT NUM8EFI (J DATE ISSUEO ! a, EXPIRATIQNOATE O!i COMWENTS
:·•<•.,.,~.--, I
I ' "IPOES
I I -
1.
; UIC ! ' I
--AIR I -
-A.CAA i ' '
I --ACRA INTERIM SU. TUS I
-' SPCC Pl.AN
I • STATE,so""" 1', -..... l-,_ r,... ~rn nn77,_
. . LOCAl.:SQtt~~, I 0072S nt11P 0014P, 00725-0016P
I
OOSP
)TMEA :S.~••• iNCDNR 1021 For domestic and
I .. NONE inrtustrial wastewater
I
I
I
! 111. SliE. DESCRIPTION 11:. ;·:R•GE:Q1SPOSAL ;C••c• .. ,~., •-1 :::2 u.-OuNT ,JJ UNIT OF MEASUFIE T C• TFIEATMENT,c,.-c1,_,...,_ 0~OTMEFI
I
: ~ SURFACE IMPOUNOMENT I = ,.__ INCENERA TION
-: 2 P!L=.S = B. UNDERGROUND 1NJECTJON
~ A 8UIL01NGS0N SITE
--OAUMS. A.80'-IE GROUND I l. QQQ gallons I
--I
: C. CHEMICAUPHYSICAL I : ) TANK. A80VEGAOUN0 IQ,QQQ i;:allQII~ = 0. BIOt.OGK:AL
-T A.NK, set.ow GAOUNO : E. WASTE OIL PFtOCESSINCi ! :,J6AflEolO~S1TE
-' _:..NQFILL ! :_: F SOLVENT FtECOVEFtY i -~ L.ANOF AFlJ.4 i : G. OTHER RECYCLING/FtECOVEAY 63 ___ ;~~,
: :-1 OPE)'j DUMP i : H OTHER I .: :. OT!-IEA I
,.s..._,
·~o-~,
:· ::l,,IMfNTS • I I
I " -:CNTAINMENT
. :;NT oliNMfNT OF wASTES,c.,., ..... ,
: l.. .),QEOUATE. SECURE = 6. MOOEA.A TE :Ki C.. INAQEOUATE. POOR :: 0, INSECURE. UNS0UN0.0ANGEAOUS
I Ci :~SCR1PT!ON OF DRUMS. Qn<ING, llNfRS. BARRIERS. ETC
Materials on the outside of the,,·manufacturing building were properly stored with the
exception bf several unmarked full or partially full 55-gallon drums, assumed to
I contain lubricating fluids, and 35-gallon drums of aluminum flake paste. The drums
were stored on the edge of the asphalt surface and adjacent soil surface with no
I diking s~stem Sell:etal e:mi2ti drums cf alYminym flake 2aste were Of;!eil and lying on
'V ACCESSIBILITY
I : 1 WASTE fAS!lY olCCES518lf: 0 YES XNO
:~ :::;MMfNTS
Wastes stored on site are easily accesible to workers (see above); however, the
I facilitv is fenced and guarded and therefore not accessible to the general public.
VI SOURCES OF INFORMA T\QN 1C•• uo•.:~-,.,.,_ .. _ • o ,,,.. , .... ,_ ..,., • .,,. ,,_u
I
I 1. State files
I ~2
Field notes
£&&,..iRM~o,o 1J11 a,, t the u I (cont.) their side, spilling residual aluminum flake paste on o gro nd
I
r
I
l,IPA
RINKING WATER SUPPLY
PE OF 0Fl1NKIHQ SUPPL'( •K••l--1
MUNl'N
-COMMUNffY
1. GROUNDWATER
SUFIF.lCE
A ii
C ~
POTENTIAL HAZARDOUS WASTE SITE
SITE INSPECTION REPORT
PART 5 • WATER, DEMOGRAPHIC, AND ENVIRONMENTAL DATA
02 STATUS
ENOANGEAeo· A.FFECTEO YONITOAEO
A C 8. -c.o -
0 C: E. = F2
I. IOENTIFICA TION
01 sr . .uep2 SITE NUl.t8EA
NC I onnnnnt.R7
I
03 OISTANCE TO SIT£
l,75(mi){surface
I A. 3 -4 , .. ~well)
I 8. I, SQQ •ft,
l~FlQUNOWATEFI use IN VIClNLTY ,o..:, .... ,
: :. OHL Y SOURCE FOR OFl1Nl(1NG X. B C)Rlt<fl(ING ~ C COr.lMEPICJAL. INOUSTR!AL.. IRRIGATION C 0. NOT USED. UNYSEABU ,o_,_...,._, iV'W"N-1-H •-I
CQMMEFICIAL. lNOUSiR1At... tFIFllGA TION l,,_. __ .,.,_•1•-I
: ~OPV!J. r,CN SERVED 8'1 GROUND WATER ___ 2~,_4_3_5 __ OJ DISTANCE TO NEAii EST OAINKIHG WA TEA WEU. 500 ft •
IEPT~ TO ~FlOUNOWATEFl
it'll
r 0~ OIAECTlOHOF GROUNOWATEFI FLOW oe OEPTM TO AQI.JtFEII
OF CONCERN
07 POTENTIAL YIELD oe SOLE SOURCE AOUIJf.R
OF M)UIF(FI
' northwest : "'ES : NO
(QDCII
I
\ 1 'JISCMA..AGE AP:EA
,·es COMMENTS = :-.c unknown
= l'ES l COMMENTS
W NO I unknown
S CE WATER
X A ~ESERVOIA. AECAEATlON
:'.;RINKING WA TEA SOUACE
·= 8. IAAIGATlON. ECONOMICALLY
IMPORTANT l=IESOUACES
= C. COMMERCIAL. 1NOUSTAIAI. = 0. NOT CURRENTLY USEC
:: ... i=~ecreo. POTENflALL Y .-.Fi:ecreo 9004ES OF WA TEA
,,,,,E. Lowerv Creek
AFFECTED 01ST ANCE TO SITE
---~--C..C...'--'-=-""-"-----------------------S ale m Lake
,-2.700 -
I Unnamed TribtJtary to I awery
DEMOGRAPHIC ANO PROPERTY INFORMATION
Creek
)I TOT.&lPOPUL,t.TIONWITHlN Four (4) miles of site 19,783
IIJNE I I) MILE OF SITE
• 953 "0 O• H IIISO,,,S
TWO 121 MJl.ES OF SITE
8. 3,224
...,. i..-"11130NI
~J NVMOE.A OF BUllCINGS WITHIN TWO 121 Mll.&SOfll Sff
unknown
THREE !31 MILES OF SITE
C -~J,fi;\,..,.,,
-_4,800 ~
!lll i-;ooo
02 DIST ,ur,ICl TO NfAFIEST POPVV, TION
] , 2QQ ft,ua.l
i.200 ft ,,,,,,.
;'.) ~QPUL.t.!10NWITHINVICIHITY0f S1TE,_. __ .. K,-•,.•.,.•01-•---••••• •: ··•• ............ _ .. .., • .,. ... ,
I
I
••• ,o,o.,,.,.,,
I
-,---'""'
I
r
I
I IEPA POTENTIAL HAZARDOUS WASTE SITE I. IOENTIFICA TION
SITE INSPECTION REPORT 01 !,UTEI02SlTENUM8fR
PART 5 -WATER, DEMOGRAPHIC, AND ENVIRONMENTAL DATA N(' "'"'f\770487
' I VI. ENVIRONMENT AL INfORMA TION
J 1 PEFl'-1£A81UTY OF UNSATURATEO ZONE tCll.r;I _,
: A 10-• -,o-e CmllK :~e 10-• -10-•cmisec = c. 10-• -1Q-l cm/MC C: J. GREATER THAN 1 a-l cm/se<:
I 02 PEFIMEA81l!TV OF BEOROCI< 1C11.c• _,
·~ A IMPERMEABLE : 9 REI.A TIVEL Y IMPEA'-4EA8LE :: C. AEL.ATIVELY -'EAMEABLE X .:J. VERY PERMEABLE
I .i llllll! ... •(l·v ,,.._IKI ,0·4 -,o-~c,..,..:, ;1,·l • •o•• :"'IKI •~•,ti•,.._ 10 • l t"" IK/
I! :::JOE PTH TO BEDROCK o, OEPTM OF CONT.U,IIINA reo SOIL ZONE 05 SOIL i,t1
I I 4 unknown 4.5·;-·6.0 I \ttl 11\\ '
I I :6 NE? PRECIPITATION 07"0f'IE YEAR 2• HOUR RAINFALL oa SlOPE Two SITE SLOPE l OIAECTION OF SITE SLOPE I TEAAJJN AVERAGE SLOPE ' 4 3 0 4 i1 :in1 (inl -% northwest "
I
I '.:9 FLOOO POTENTIAL ,o NA
Sli"E 15 IN
2 SITE IS ON BARFUER ISLAND. COA.STAL HIGH HA.ZARO AREA. AMRINE FLOOOWAY 1'::: AR FLOODPLAIN
• 1 '.:1S7ANCE TO >l'/ETLANOS1,,c,•-1 2 OLSTA~E TO CRITICAL l"IABITATr_,__.._,_
I ::.STUAAINE NA C:iHER NA
' '"'"
A :m•I a. tm•J ENOANGEREO SPECIES:
. ) \.ANO use :N V•C!NITV
I ! JtSTANCE TO
RESIDENTIAL AREAS. NA TIONAL.1S7,;, TE PARKS. A.GRICUL TUAAL L>.NOS
SOMMEACIAUINOUSTFIIAL i:coAESTS. CA WtLOL1FE RESERVES -'RIME AG LANO AGL.ANO
I unknown • A unknQRn (mil B 1,200 ft -C. (mil 0. ,,,.,
·' :es.,:R1PTION OF SITE IN RELAT~k TO SURROUNOlNQ TOPOQRAPN'!'
I The topography of the area is characterized by extensive hill and ridge
systems. The site is near the top of a small, gently sloping hill, that slopes
to the northwest toward Lowery Creek. Slopes at the site range from 0 to 4.
I I percent. Site elevations are highest on the southeast corner of the site,
940± feet, and the lowest on the northwest corner of the site, 880±,feet.
I
I
I
I '
Vil. SOURCES OF INFORMATION ,c,.., • .,_,.,.,_ .. ••· lfM• ,... •-............ •-II
I 1. USGS Topographic Map 5. Climatic Atlas of the United States
2. State files 6. Rainfall Frequency Atlas of the United States
3. Field notes . North Carolina Statistical Abstract
• • PAJOAW2070·13l7·8t) '
I
I
l•PA POTENTIAL HAZARDOUS WASTE SITE I. I0EHTIFICA TION
SITE INSPECTION REPORT 01 STAT"elO'2 SITE ~...aeA
PART 6 • SAMPLE AND FIELD INFORMATION
NC Dnnn77n.,.o1
I SAMPLES TAKEN
01 NUMBER Of C2 SAMPlES SENT TO 03 esm,1.A T'EO OATf.
SA"-IPLE TYPE SAMP\.ES TAKEN .ct!St.A.TSAV........a.!
GROUN0WA fEA
SUFlFACE WATER 2 State Analvtical Laboratory unknown
WASTE .,.
RUNOFF
I SP1LL
i SOIL 5 Industrial & Environmental Analvsts. Inc. 9/91
·•EGE: A TION i
i C:"HER (sediment) 2 State Analystical Laboratory unknown
II. FIEL0 MEASUREMENTS TAKEN
1 T'l"PE 02COMWNTS
'
; NA
;
i
I
V. PHQTOCRAPHS ANO MAPS
: ~. :.e .:-. GAOU~~ ,: .:..EAIAL \ c2 :.., CuSTOOY oi= ,.,_.,c·:_,.,_..,_ f' "''' : :, LOCATIONOI= liolAPS
.x ,·es NCDEHNB S11pe:cfi1Dd Section G:ceenbcx:oe & Q'Ma:ta Inc
I : '.IQ i o:c
V. OTHER FIELO OAT A COLLECTED ,,.,. _ _,_",er.,_,
I
~
I
VI. SOURCES OF INFORM A TIQN ;c.,. aoec-•••••-H • e ,·,·•••u ,_ -.1.1 ••CIOl'IU
I .
1. Field notes
AM2O10•1lj7 flt
I i
I
'
I
la:PA POTENTIAL HAZARDOUS WASTE SITE l1. lOENTIFICATION
SITE INSPECTION REPORT !01SU.Tfl02SITE,""->14EA
PART 7 • OWNER INFORMATION ~Tf' 111 , 7(}/.iP..7
'
URRENT OWNERlS) PA.RENT COMPANY,,,. __ ,
••• 020+8NVW8f.Fl 08 NAME 09 0+ 8 NUM8EA
Johnson Controls Inc.
['"~;~o;•~~ ';;~::~:; 1o•SJCCOOE IOSTFlEETAOOAESS,itO 1o •. 11110,.t1c1 I\ 1 SICCOOE
Avenue
:!. :,: . r• ~; TE i" ~~ :~: :~CHY .. )SiATE 1 • Z!P COOE
Milwaukee
I I
, .... e C.2 0+8NUM6ER 08 NAME Oi0+8NUM8EA
'.lJSTREET ,.OOAESS •o .... .-,o, ,,c, 10• SJCCOOE 10 STREU 400RESS1.-0 ...... ltlO ,. HC i I' 1 SCC00£
cir" )°II STATE or ZlPCOOf. I 2 CITY 11JSTAfE I 4 Z1PCOOE , ... , I 02 ~•INVWBEA 011 N.&.Ml Oi0+8NUM&EA
:J~r=!!:TAOQRESS •o lo, UO• ... jJ• SICCOOE 1QSTREET.._OOFlES.S1itO lo• 111,0, . ..c, l 11 SICCOOE
I
c:r, !°ISTATEl°T ZIPCOOE 1 2 CHY \1JSTATE 14 ZIPCOOf.
. ........ 1; \:;0+8NUM8EFl 08 NAMf Oi0•8 NUM8EA
..
i ,.J S~~EET ADORE~ •Q .. , /1110• OIC, 10• SICCOOE 1 O STAEi:T .t.OORES.S ,_ o .... 1110 • . .,,,1 r l S,CCOOi
I ,c. 100 STAT 01 ZIPCOOE 12 CIT"'r \:JSU.TE ,•z1PCOOE
: [f :,:~VIOUS OWNERCSl ,,,., _,,,.,_,.,., II/. RE.ALTY OWNER{S) r•--·••-•., ... -,~•u
02 0 t 8 NUMBER 01 NAME 02 0•8 "IUM&EPI
·::lJ S7.IEET .t.OORES.S • 0 h• u::,, ••c, I 04 SICCOOE 03 STIIIEET A00RESS1, O lo•. 1110,. •", l J• SICCOOE
I ~"". !oesu.relo1 z1Pcooe 0~ CITY (&SU.TE or z:PCOOE
I I,.,....,£ (20~8HUM8ER 01 N.a.ME :4 0•8"1UM8ER
:>JSTAEET A00RES5 -o .. , "'0• mi ,O• SC CODE 03 STREET AOORESS1, o 1o1. ,.,o,. __ , 10• SC CODE
I .,5 C1:-Y la.STATE 07 ZIPCOOf. O~OT"I' 108STATE o, Zlf'COOE
01 NAM( .:J20+1NUMIE.A 01 ,.....,..i 02 0.,INUMBE..A
I µJ 5:.-EE7 .1QORE:SS • O a..,"'.;.• ,,, , 10• SIC COOE 03 STIIIEE r AOORESSr-o ... ,,,,o,. •re 1 j :>• SICCOOE
i
I O~CIT'I' IOUTATE 01 ZIPCOO£ O~OTY f O& STATE 07 ZIP COOE
·.;, SOURCES OF INFORMATION ,cu..-,.,,,_ .. , 1. ""'•-•-•--... ,_.,
I I. State files
I ,.._,o, .. ,, ,, ,,,
I
I
POTENTIAL HAZARDOUS WASTE SITE
SITE INSPECTION REPORT
PART 8 · pPERATOR INFORMATION
L IOENTIFICA. TION
II. CURRENT OPERATOR ;"•-•---•-.,, OPERATOR'S PARENT COMPANY,,, __ ,
1 N~E 02O♦8NUM8ER
Globe Batter Division
P.O. Box 1002
j J5Cl0
I Winston-Salem
04 SICCOOE
V6STATE 07 ZIPCOOE
NC 27102
Ill. PREVIOUS OPERATOR{S) rlAr-•••K--. ••o---•---•---•
02 0 + 8 NUMBER
o,s-ccooe
06 STATE 01 ZIP CODE
02 0+8 NUMBEFI
i )J STREET ,r,00RfS.S,_. 0 ... 1110, ••c 1 04 SIC CODE
' J! l'E.A,CIS OF OPERA Tl0H
oe ST A TE 07 ZIP COOE
I 011 NAME a, ow..eA DURIHG rH&S PERICO
I ' 02 0 • B NUMBER
o, SICCOOE
oe ST A TE 07 ZJP COOE
a Yf~SOF OP£AAflQJril 09NAM£ OF OWNERDURIHG T>GSPEAIOO
''.JNAME 11Q+8NUMBEFI
· 2 STREET AOORESS ,,. 0 .... 11110 ,. •IC 1 1 3 SICCOOE
t5STATE !IIZIPCOOE
PREVIOUS OPERATORS' PARENT COMPANIES 1•--•
11 O+BNU),IIBER
: 2 STREET AOOAESS ,• 0 .... 1t1101 1,c.1 'J SIC COOE
'5STAT'E 1eZIPCOOf
: I O•BNUMBER
2 SiREET AOORESS :• O h• 111(11. 1,c, 1J SICCOOE
·•err, 15 sure 1ezIPco0£
11 0•8NUM9EJII
, J sic cooe
1~STATE 16ZJPCOOE
IV. SOURCES OF INFOAMATION ,c-.,.......,-... .... --....,.,.-.,. --11
I. State files
I .. ' :.r
I
'A
N•SITE GENERATOR
II. OFF-SITE GENERATOR(S)
~=-=er ,t,QQAESS ,,, C .... ,oo. ••c I
IV. TFU.NSPORTER(S)
CITY
POTENTIAL HAZARDOUS WASTE SITE
SITE INSPECTION REPORT
PART 9 • GENERATOR/TRANSPORTER INFORMATION
1 02 0♦ 8 HUM8ER
I
lo" sccooe
oe STATE OT ZIP COOE
020+8NUMBEA
o, saccooe
oe s;.,re 01 ZIPCOOE
02 0 • 8 NlJ1r,,18fA
l O• SIC CODE
01 NAM£
03$TAEETA00'4fSS11>0 1o, . .11,;, 11c1
05CIT'Y
ell NAM£
OJ STREET AOOAESS ,, o .... ,..,: • 1,c.,
ice Sh TE 01 ZIPCOOE
I
01 NAM£
::• sw:cooe OJSH~EfTAOOAESS11>0 h• ~•:• 11~1
05 CITY
02 0•8 NUMBER
c• sccooe OJ STREET Jt,OORfSS ,,, O ........ v; • 1,c 1
06$TATE 07Z1PCOO£ os on
. SOURCES OF INFORMATION tC ..... .-,., .. -... ••-~••--•-....,.,._,_,.,
I
•
I
I. IOENTIFICA TION
NC
o• S.C::COOE
oosu,re 01 ZIPCOOE
02 0+ 8 NUMIIEII
011 SICCOOI
,'.;6Sh.TE or t1PCOO(
02 0+ 8 NUMSl,.
a, SIC COO£
oesu.re 07Z1PCOOE
o, SK:C00£
04STATE 07 ZIPCOOE
I
I
POTENTIAL HAZARDOUS WASTE SITE
SITE INSPECTION REPORT
PART 10 • PAST RESPONSE ACTIVITIES
AST RESPONSE ACTIVITIES
,: • : A. w ,l, re~ SUPPl y Cl.OSEO
: ~ .::ESCP:t.::,nQN
NA
: 3 ':MPORAAY WATER SUPPLY p,:::1ov1oeo
: .; JC:5C;:_:;:'f":QN
NA
:: C. =2:u_.ANEl•H WATER SUPPlY PROVIDED
: .; oesc;:.;;,rlQN
NA
02 DATE ______ _
02 DATE ______ _
020ATE ______ _
I : · :X ~ S.:,1Ll.E0 MATERIAL AEMOVEO
: .:.. JESCA1?TION
02 CATE
I
I
I
Acid from as ill was um ed int
~ : • .:..5TE ctEPACKAGEO
: : .::eSC?1nJQN
NA
-. : ::. ·.·, :..s,e DISPOSED ELSEWHERE
:.; ::ESC?.:;>ilON
NA
: • : I"'! Cr·• SJTE BURIAL
: .; :JESCl=.:?TJON
i -~ S,i"i\J C~EMICAL TREATMENT
: .; JESCFL:,7\QN
NA
: · : J ., SITU 81()L0GICAL TAEA TMENT
: .; .;esc,;::i110N
: · : .". ,·. $17'..; ;,..-"S1CAL TREATMENT
: .; OESCA;DTIQN
NA
-:·· : M :.•~EAGENCY WA:iTE TREAThlENT
: .; DESCRIPTION
NA
:.· :'. N C"..:70FF WAI.LS
:, 0EscnI?TION
NA
;) :-.~E;:a.GCNCY OIK.LNGJSURFACE WA TEA orvEASUJN
: ~ JESC!=l:••Hl()N
NA
: · :-~ :·..;:QFF TRENCHESISUMP
: ~ OESCF.:?TKJN
NA
: . :.: C s-...asuAFACE CUTOFF WALL
:~ aesc.::.;~rioN
02 DATE ______ _
020ATE ______ _
02 CATE ______ _
02'JATE ______ _
020ATE ______ _
02 DATE ______ _
02 DATE ______ _
020ATE ______ _
02 CATE ______ _
02 CATE ______ _
OJ AGENCY
OJ AGENCY
03 AGENCY
CJ AGENCY
-JJ AGENCY
OJ AGENCY
•:::J AGENCY
OJ AGENCY
OJ AGENCY
OJ AGENCY
OJAGENCY __________ _
OJ AGENCY ___________ _
03 AGENCY
OJ AGENCY
I
PA
AST RESPONSE ACTIVITIES,c°"-
C: C: A. BARRIER WALLS CONSTRUCTED
: .a DESCRIPTION
NA
: ' ':: S CAPP1NG'COVEAlNG
:• DESCRIPTION
NA
~1 ._: T BULK TANKAGE REPAIRED
: .a DESCRIPTION
N I ·J1 Q U GAOUTCURTAINCONSTAUCTEO
:, DESCRIPTION
I
I
I
I
I
)1 ~ V BOTTOM SEALED
:, DESCRIPTION
: · :: W GAS CONTROL :.i DESCA1PT1QN
: ? :: -. FIRE CQNTPOL
: .a DESCRIPTION
NA
)1 ::: Y LE.-.CHATE iREATMENT
,J, DESCRIPTION
C Z. AREA EVACUATED
:• DESCRIPTION
NA
~, _ 1 ACCESS TO SITE .:iesTAICTEO
:·4 DESCRIPTION
: ' : 2. -'OPU~TION RELOCATED
: ..: DESCRIPTION
NA
JI = J. OTHER AEMEOIAL .t.CTlVITIES
J4 DESCRIPTION
NA
POTENTIAL HAZARDOUS WASTE SITE
SITE INSPECTION REPORT
PART 10 · PAST RESPONSE ACTIVITIES
02 CATE ______ _
020ATE
02 CATE
02 CATE
02 CATE
020ATE
02 DATE
02 CATE ______ _
·J2 DATE ______ _
020ATE ______ _
02 QA.TE ______ _
. I. SOURCES OF INFORMATION ,co,•.c~.c••••••-:n •• .,.,._, ,_..,..,,,. •-•,
State files
I
l. !OENT1FICA TION
Ot STATE 02 5(1c ~
NC
OJAGENCY __________ _
OJ AGENCY
OJ AGENCY
OJ AGENCY
OJ AGENCY
OJ AGENCY
03 AGENCY
OJ AGENCY __________ _
OJ AGENCY __________ _
OJ AGENCY __________ _
OJ AGENCY __________ _
03 AGENCY __________ _
I
II. ENFORCEMENT INFORM.A. TION
I
I I
I
I
I
i •• i
I
I
'
I
I
--I
POTENTIAL HAZARDOUS WASTE SITE
SITE INSPECTION REPORT
PART 11 · ENFORCEMENT INFORMATION
'Ill. SOURCES OF INFORMATION ,c,., __ ,.,._., ., 11., ..... ,_ ....... , .• ,._., 1·-
' I. State files
I
I. IOENTIFICA TION
01 STATE 02 srrt 1'4VM8EFI
I
•• I
I
I
I
I
I
I APPENDIXC
ANALYTICAL DATA ..
I See Volume II
I
I
I
I
I
I ••
I
- --• ---I ---- - --• -
TABLE 3
SUMMARY OF CHEMICAL ANALYSES FOR
THE JOHNSON CONTROLS -GLOBE BATTERY SITE
NCO 000770487
SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION
Analyzed at the North Carolina State Laboratory of Public Hea
Surface Water Surface Water
Sample Collection Information Sediment Sample Sediment Sample Sample Sample
and Parameters North of Site South of Site North of Site South of Site Trip Blank
ANALYTE DETECTED
Matrix Sediment Sediment Water Water NA
Physical Waste Concentration Units mg/kg mg/kg mg/l mg/l NA
TotaljTCLP TotalfTCLP
Solid A,D HES aluminum NA NA NA NA NA
Sol id A,D HES antimony NA NA NA NA NA
Solid A,D HES arsenic <4.0/<0.02 <4.0/<0.02 <0.01 <0.01 NA
Sol id A,D HES barium 73/Q.75 25/0.67 <0.04 0.09 NA
Sol id A,D HES beryllium NA NA NA NA NA
Sol id A,D HES cadmium <16/<0.08 <16/<0.08 <0.005 <0.005 NA
Sol id D HES calcium NA NA NA NA NA
Sol id A,D HES chromium <20/<0.10 45*/<0.10 <0.02 <0.02 NA
Sol id A,D HES cabal t NA NA NA NA NA
Sol id A,D HES copper NA NA NA NA NA
Solid A,D HES iron NA NA NA NA NA
Sol id A,D HES Lead 18/<0.50 4700*/144.87• 0.008 1.035 NA
Solid A,D HES magnesium NA NA NA NA NA
Sol id A,D HES manganese NA NA NA NA NA Liquid A,D HES mercury <0.1/<0.02 <0.1/<0.02 <0.0002 <0.0002 NA Solid A,D H_ES nickel NA NA NA NA NA Solid D HES potassium NA NA NA NA NA Solid A,D HES selenium <1.0/<0.002 <1.0/<0.02 <0.02 <0.02 NA Solid A,D HES silver <20/<0.10 <25/<0.10 <0.05 < 0.05 NA Solid D HES sodium NA NA NA NA NA
Sol id A,D HES thallium NA NA NA NA NA
---•
Physical Waste
State Characteristics* Category
Sol id A,O MES
Sol id A,O MES
Solid A ICC
- ---TABLE 3
SUMMARY OF CHEMICAL ANALYSES FOR
THE JOHNSON CONTROLS -GLOBE BATTERY SITE
NCO 000770487
SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION
-
Analyzed at the North Carolina State Laboratory of Public Hea
- --
Surface Water Surface Water
Sediment Sample Sediment Sample Sample Sample
-
Sample Collection Information
and Parameters North of Site South of Site North of Site South of Site Trip Blank
ANALYTE DETECTED
vanadium
zinc
cyanide
NA -Not Analyzed
(CONT.)
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
• Concentrations significant, considered to be .a release
[] -Below CROL
K -Actual value is known to be less than value given
J -Estimated Value
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
- --•
--.---
COMPOUND QUALIFIERS
u
J
UJ
C
B
-- --I --
DEFINITION
Indicates compound was analyzed for
but not detected.
Indicates an estimated value.
Quantitation limit is estimated due
to a quality control (QC) protocol.
This flag applies to pesticide
results where the identification has
been confirmed by GC/MS. Single
component pesticides ~lO ng/uL. in
the final extract shall be confirmed
by GC/MS.
This flag is used when the compound
is found in the associated blank as
well as in the sample! It indicates
possible/probable blarik
contamination and warris the data
user to take appropriate action.
----
INTERPRETATION
Compound was not detected at or
above the CRDL.
Compound value may be semi-
quantitative.
Compound was not detected if value
is at CRDL, e.g., lOU UJ. If a
value is reported with a UJ above
CRDL and it is <5x blank
concentration (lOx for common
laboratory artifacts), the compound
is detected but may be a laboratory
artifac and not attributable to the
sample.
Compound was confirmed by GC/MS and
is quantitative. Use pesticide/PCB
listed value.
Compound value may be semi-
quantitative if it is <Sx the blank
concentration (<lOx the blank
concentrations for common laboratory
artifacts: phthalates, methylene
chloride, acetone, toluene, 2-
butanone).
-
--.---
COMPOUND QUALIFIERS
E
D
A
R
X
ANALYTE QUALIFIERS
E E
s s
R N
----I - -
DEFINITION
This flag identifies compounds whose
concentrations exceed the
calibration range of the GC/MS
instrument for the specific
analysis. This flag will D.ll.t. apply
to presticides/PCBs analyzed by
GC/EC methods.
This flag identifies all compounds
identified in an analysis at a
secondary dilution factor.
This flag indicates that a TIC is a suspected aldol-condensation
product.
Results are unusable due to a major
violation of QC protocol.
Cannot be confirmed by CLP
protocols.
DEFINITION
Estimated or not reported due to
interference. See laboratory
narrative.
Analysis by Method of Standard
Additions.
Spike recoveries outside QC
protocols, which indicates a
possible matrix problem. Data may
be baised high or low. See spike
results and laboratory narrative.
----
INTERPRETATION
Compound value may be semi-
quantitative. There should be
another analysis with a D qualifier,
which is to be used.
Alerts data user to a possible
change in the CRDL. Data is
quantitative.
Alerts data user of a laboratory
artifact in the TICs only.
Compound value is not usable.
Compound may or may not be present.
INTERPRETATION
Analyte or element was not detected,
or value may be semiquantitative.
Value is quantitative.
Value may be quantitative or semi-
quantitative.
-
--.-
Raste
A -
B -
C -
---
* *
+ +
[ l B
UJ
J
u u
M
II
R
-- -...
Duplicate value outside QC protocols
which indicates a possible matrix
problem.
Correlation coefficient for standard
additions is less than 0.995. See
review and laboratory narrative.
Value is real, but is above
instrument DL and below CRDL.
DL is estimated because of a QC
protocol. DL is possibly above or
below CRDL.
Value is above CRDL and is an
estimated value because of a QC
protocol.
Compound was analyzed for but not
detected.
Duplicate injection precision not
met.
Post-digestion spike for furnace AA
analysis is out of control limits
(35-115%), while sample absorbance
is <50% of spike absorbance.
Results are unusable due to a major
violation of QC protocols.
Cba:cacte:i:istjcs Identjfjcatlon*
Toxic D -Persistent G -Flammable Corrosive E -Soluble H -Ignitable Radioactive F -Infectious I Highly Volatile
-
J
K
L
----.-
Value may be quantitative or semi-
quantitative.
Data value may be biased.
Value may be quantitative or semi-
quantitative.
Compound or element was not
detected.
Value may be semiquantitative.
Compound was not detected at or
above the CRDL.
Value may be semiquantitative.
Value may be semiquantitative.
Analyte value is not usable.
Explosive
Reactive
Incompatible
-
.. '1 ,, '1 .. '1 .. , I .. '1
,, '1
,, '1
,, '1
"' 1
,. '1
{ 1 1.11''/. -, ct-r , · ·_,,
~ ·•='/'1
I~
\ ~ .. :
~ '• l l: --. . ,,...... ~-' _-· ·s-.::.-" ' .
j
,~ec: ·--
~ ~m -' I. ·-~-· .
:-: ·:--0';--:-. .,· . . ~j , . ;.,, ~-
ri,~;.--== ~-
:, ~
"\?' -, . / 0 ~
¾-' . 0
~
, z ... ¢.--
c...:::=
•
' I
('
'
' . :,
'
'
. ' ~-;
'~'c--'i
b g N z " ~ 0 >-a: w I-!;j: m w m 0 ..I CJ I UJ ..I 0 a: I-z 0 u z 0 UJ z ::r: 0 -:,
o z
0 z "' ~ w ;:;: a: ' ::, (!) -LL 0 z ., 0 ~ C z w "' ~ " w w >-:c < C " 0 " • • • • "' • ~ u z.; D. ·• •• ·-cc ,. Uo fa :E -· ~ -. .. u (,) .... ~· . . .. -C -"' • ! ::c 0 • •• •• .... ;i D. .... cc 0 ,J;.: z• 0 • •" a: 0 =• 0 i: C, u ~-z 0 ii ,J oz • D. , ti 0. 0 ,. I! I-~ !s ~. ~c ~-" ~ ~ 0 ~
"' w • ~ • ~ ~ 3: ,. 3:
z ~ w
~ <( ~ <I> ~ I ~ ~ • w !l! ':'i "' ~ z • ;, w "'
f;l'J ·.:<,
r\()ji I ~.,'.'<
}\~: Iii ·•-.