The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutNCD000770487_19911212_Johnson Controls Battery Group_SERB SPD_Data Validation Package-OCRI I I I ' ' I ' I I I I I I I I 1: I I I 1' 11 .-\ ·•· DATA VALIDATION PACKAGE For Johnson Controls / Globe Battery NCD 000 770 487 Winston-Salem, Forsyth County North Carolina I I I I I CERCLA I I I DATA VALIDATION PACKAGE I For I Johnson Controls / Globe Battery NCD 000 770 487 I Winston-Salem, Forsyth County North Carolina I I I I I I I I .... -_._ - - --· - -.I - - --- --'--_.,.j I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY /SA S Region IV S l SB Environmental Services Divisip,n-..r::ir:-,.r::itU{~'~-, College Station Road, Athens, Ga. \~TW~U-.! ' \~{ OE~ l \\ \99\ Q"-- j ~. m:GlOl'I rt *****MEMORANDUM****** ~TLA~"'l'A,GJ\. DATE: 12/12/91 SUBJECT: Results of Metals Analysis; 92-0184 JOHNSON CONTROLS NC SAS NO: NC FROM: Robert W. Knight ,/c!'c? ,::J,,,_,,.do /';;,r Chief, Laboratory Evaluation/Quality Assurance Section TO: AL HANKE Attached are the results of analysis of samples collected as part of the subject project. As a result of the Quality Assurance Review, certain data qualifiers may have been placed on the data. Attached is a DATA QUALIFIER REPORT which explains the reasons that these qualifiers were required. If you have any questions. please contact me. ATTACHMENT I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I INORGANIC DATA QUALIFIERS REPORT Case Number: Carolina P & L/ Johnson Control Project Number:_==-------------Site: Cape Fear. NC Element A, Water As, Hg, Zn Al, Ba, Ca, Na Be Cd Ag All Metals B. Soil As, Hg, Zn Al, Ba, Ga, Mg, Na Cd Ag Hg V Flag u Mg, u J J J J u Fe, u J J J J Samples Affected All positives> rDL but < CRDL All positives> rDL but < lOX contaminant level All samples with Al or Fe concentrations in solution > 53,000 ug/L All with Fe concentrations in solution> 33,000 ug/L All with Fe concentrations in solution> 94,000 ug/L CLMWOl and CLGWO3 All positives> rDL but < CRDL All positives> roL but < lOX contaminant level All with Fe concentrations. in solution> 33,000 ug/L All with Fe concentrations in solution> 94,000 ug/L All CLSSO4 Reasons Baseline instability Positives in blanks Suspected over correction as noted in the contractor ICS Suspected over correction as noted in the contractor res Suspected over correction as noted in the contractor res Sample improperly preserved Baseline instability Positives in blanks Suspected over correction as noted in the contractor res Suspected over correction as noted in the contractor res Matrix spike recovery -62.8% % RSD > 20% for rep multiple exposures ----- METALS DATA REPORT -----SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA. ------12/11/91 *** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * • • • "******* * * * * • * * * * * * * * * * * * * • • • ••• •• .. •• PROJECT NO. 92-0184 SAMPLE NO. 63809 SAMPLE TYPE: SOIL •• SOURCE: JOHNSON CONTROLS •• STATION ID: "JCSS01 •• CASE NUMBER: 0 SAS NUMBER: NC .. MG/KG 37000 9.6U 2U 310 2. 1 0.91UJ 30U 25 18 22 39000 17 8800 ALUMINUM ANTIMONY ARSENIC BARIUM BERYLLIUM CADMIUM CALCIUM CHROMIUM COBALT COPPER IRON LEAD MAGNESIUM •••FOOTNOTES••• • • * * * * • * * * * * •• ANALYTICAL RESULTS PROG ELEM: NC CITY: COLLECTION START: MD NUMBER: 5501 COLLECTED BY: B SCOTT ST: NC 06/25/91 1110 STOP: 00/00/00 * * * * * * * * * • * * * * • * • * * • * MG/KG 2100 0. 1 UJ 26 12000 0.23U 1.1UJ 220U 1U NA 71 110 10 MANGANESE MERCURY NICKEL POTASSIUM SELENIUM SILVER SODIUM THALLIUM TIN VANADIUM ZINC ANALYTICAL RESULTS PERCENT MOISTURE * • * * •• .. .. • •• •A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE Of PRESENCE Of MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT. •R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION. - -- - - --- - ---SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA. METALS DATA REPORT ****************************** PROJECT NO. 92-0184 SAMPLE NO. 63808 SAMPLE TYPE: SOIL SOURCE: JOHNSON CONTROLS • • • PROG ELEM: NC CITY: --- COLLECTED BY: B SCOTT ST: NC - ••• •• .. .. .. .. STATION ID: JCSS02 CASE NUMBER: 0 SAS NUMBER: NC COLLECTION START: 06/25/91 1130 STOP: 00/00/00 *** •• * MG/KG 28000 lOU 3.3 110 o. 79 0.95UJ 980 35 7 11 29000 18 · 1400 ALUMINUM ANTIMONY ARSENIC BARIUM BERYLLIUM CADMIUM CALCIUM CHROMIUM · COBALT COPPER IRON LEAD MAGNESIUM •••FOOTNOTES••• •• • * • • • * • • • * • • • * • • • • • • • ANALYTICAL RESULTS MD NUMBER: 5502 * •••• MG/KG 400 0.2UJ 8.7 1200 0.23U 1. 2UJ 180U 0.46U NA 62 20 13 •••••••••••••••• MANGANESE MERCURY NICKEL POTASSIUM SELENIUM SILVER SODIUM THALLIUM TIN VANADIUM ZINC ANALYTICAL RESULTS PERCENT MOISTURE --12/11/91 • • • ••• .. •• .. .. • • .. . •A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NA!-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT. •R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS JS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION. - - - - -------SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA. METALS DATA REPORT • * * * • * * * * * • • • * • • • • * * • * • * • * * • • * PROJECT NO. 92-0184 SAMPLE NO. 63807 SAMPLE TYPE: SOIL SOURCE: JOHNSON CONTROLS * * * * • * * * * • • PROG ELEM: NC CITY: ---- * • • • * • • * • * * * • • * * * COLLECTED BY: B SCOTT *** ** ** ** ** ** STATION ID: JCSS03 COLLECTION START: ST: NC 06/25/91 1430 STOP: 00/00/00 CASE NUMBER: 0 SAS NUMBER: NC MG/KG 16000 9.5U 2U 120 0.81 0.90UJ 1800 26 19 27 22000 920 3900 ALUMINUM ANTIMONY ARSENIC BARIUM BERYLLIUM CADMIUM CALCIUM CHROMIUM COBALT COPPER IRON LEAD MAGNESIUM •••FOOTNOTES•*• * * •• * * * ••••• * * ANALYTICAL RESULTS • • * * * • * • • MD NUMBER: 5503 * •••• MG/KG 750 0.2UJ 14 3400 0.23U 1.1UJ 360U 0.46U NA 50 45 10 MANGANESE MERCURY NICKEL POTASSIUM SELENIUM SILVER SODIUM THALLIUM TIN VANADIUM ZINC ANALYTICAL RESULTS PERCENT MOISTURE --12/11/91 *** ** ** ** ** ** * ** •A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAl-!NTERFERENCES •J-EST!MATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT. •R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION. - -- - ---- METALS DATA REPORT -----SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS. GA. ----- - 12/11/91 *** * * • * * * • * * * * •• * * • * • * * * * * * * •• * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * • * * * * * * * * * * * • * * * • ••• •• •• •• •• •• •• PROJECT NO. 92-0184 SAMPLE NO. 63806 SAMPLE TYPE: SOIL •• SOURCE: JOHNSON CONTROLS •• STATION ID: JCSBOl •• CASE NUMBER: 0 SAS NUMBER: NC •• MG/KG 17000 9.8U 2U 230 1. 8 0.93UJ sou 14 14 49 25000 1U 4700 ALUMINUM ANTIMONY ARSENIC BARIUM BERYLLIUM CADMIUM CALCIUM CHROMIUM COBALT COPPER IRON LEAD MAGNESIUM •••FOOTNOTES••• ANALYTICAL RESULTS PROG ELEM: NC COLLECTED BY: B SCOTT CITY: ST: NC COLLECTION START: 06/25/91 1245 STOP: 00/00/00 MD NUMBER: SB01 MG/KG 2300 0. 1 UJ 16 6600 0.24U 1. 2UJ 140U 0.47U NA 47 54 10 MANGANESE MERCURY NICKEL POTASSIUM SELENIUM SILVER SODIUM THALLIUM TIN VANADIUM ZINC ANALYTICAL RESULTS PERCENT MOISTURE •A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED " •NAI-JNTERFERENCES •J-ESTJMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE JS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT. •R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION. - ----------- - SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA. ----12/11/91 METALS DATA·REPORT ... •• .. .. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ••• * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ••• ••• •• •• •• •• •• PROJECT NO. 92-0184 SAMPLE NO. 63804 SAMPLE TYPE: SOIL SOURCE: JOHNSON CONTROLS •• STATION ID: JCSB02 CASE NUMBER: 0 SAS NUMBER: NC . .. MG/KG 46000 20U 3,6 120 0.97 0.99UJ 220 27 15 22 30000 19 4200 * * * * * ALUMINUM ANTIMONY ARSENIC BARIUM BERYLLIUM CADMIUM CALCIUM CHROMIUM COBALT COPPER IRON LEAD MAGNESIUM • • * * * * * * * * * * •• ANALYTICAL RESULTS * * * * * * * * * PROG ELEM: NC CITY: COLLECTION START: MD NUMBER: SB02 COLLECTED BY: B SCOTT ST: NC 06/25/91 1345 STOP: 00/00/00 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * MG/KG 410 0.2UJ 12 3900 0.24U 1. 2UJ 200U 1U NA 54 46 15 MANGANESE MERCURY NICKEL POTASSIUM SELENIUM SILVER SODIUM THALLIUM TIN VANADIUM ZINC ANALYTICAL RESULTS PERCENT MOISTURE * * * * ••• •••FOOTNOTES••• •A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE Of PRESENCE Of MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT. •R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION. - - 0 I I· I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Region IV Environmental Services Division College Station Road, Athens, Ga. 30613 *****MEMORANDUM****** DATE: 12/ 12/91 SUBJECT: Results of Specified Analysis; 92-0184 JOHNSON CONTROLS NC SAS NO: NC FROM: Robert W. Knight k'J? $,,,,,,,J:t::D,4;,, Chief, Laboratory Evaluation/Quality Assurance Section TO: AL HANKE Attached are the results of analysis of samples collected as part of the subject project. As a result of the Quality Assurance Review, certain data qualifiers may have been placed on the data. Attached is a DATA QUALIFIER REPORT which explains the reasons that these _qualifiers were required. If you have any questions please contact me. ATTACHMENT I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I INORGANIC DATA QUALIFIERS REPORT Case Number: Carolina P & L/ Johnson Control Project Number: ______________ _ Site: Cape Fear, NC Element A. Water As, Hg, Zn Al, Ba, Ca, Mg, Na Be Cd Ag All Metals B. Soil As, Hg, Zn Al, Ba, Ca, Fe, Mg, Na Cd Ag Hg V Flag u u J J J J u u J J J J Samples Affected All positives> roL but < CRDL All positives> roL but < lOX contaminant level All samples with Al or Fe concentrations in solution > 53,000 ug/L All with Fe concentrations in solution> 33,000 ug/L All with Fe concentrations in solution> 94,000 ug/L CLMWOl and CLGWO3 All positives> roL but < CRDL All positives> roL but < lOX contaminant level All with Fe concentrations in solution> 33,000 ug/L All with Fe concentrations in solution> 94,000 ug/L All CLSSO4 Reasons Baseline instability Positives in blanks Suspected over correction as noted in the contractor res Suspected over correction as noted in the contractor res Suspected over correction as noted in the contractor ICS Sample improperly preserved Baseline instability Positives in blanks Suspected over correction as noted in the contractor ICS Suspected over correction as noted in the contractor res Matrix spike recovery 62.8% % RSD > 20% for rCP multiple exposures -- - -- - - - - ---SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA. --- - - 11111 12/11/91 SPECIFIED ANALYSIS DATA REPORT * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * •• ******* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * • • • ... •• •• •• •• • • ... •• •• •• •• •• PROJECT NO. 92-0184 SAMPLE NO. 63809 SAMPLE TYPE: SOIL SOURCE: JOHNSON CONTROLS STATION ID: JCSSOl CASE. NO. : 0 SAS NO. : NC PROG ELEM: NC CITY: COLLECTION START: D. NO. 5501 RESULTS UNITS PARAMETER 5.6U MG/KG CYANIDE COLLECTED BY: B SCOTT ST: NC 06/25/91 1110 STOP: 00/00/00 MD NO: 5501 •**FOOTNOTES*** •A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT. - -- -- - - - ---- - SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS, GA. - - - ---12/11/91 SPECIFIED ANALYSIS DATA. REPORT * * * * • * • * * * * • * • * * • * * * -. * * * * * * * * * • • • • •••••• * * * • * * • * * * * * • * * * • * * • • • ••• .. ••• PROJECT NO. 92-0184 SAMPLE NO. 63808 SAMPLE TYPE: SOIL SOURCE: JOHNSON CONTROLS STATION ID: JCSS02 PROG ELEM: NC CITY: COLLECTION START: D. NO.: SS02 COLLECTED BY: B SCOTT ST: NC 06/25/91 1130 STOP: 00/00/00 MD NO: SS02 •• .. •• •• •• .. .. CASE. NO. : 0 SAS NO. : NC •• ** *** * ·• * * * * * • * * • * * * * * * • * * * * * * • * * * * * * • * * * • * * * * * * * * * * • * * * * * * * * * •• * * * • *** RESULTS UNITS PARAMETER 5.6U MG/KG CYANIDE •••FOOTNOTES••• •A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE JS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT. - --- --- -- - - --SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA. --- - --12/11/91 SPECIFIED ANALYSIS DATA REPORT • • • • • • • • • • • • • • * • • • • • • • • • • • • * * • • •• • • • • • • • ••••••••••••••••••• • • • ... •• .. .. .. .. ••• •• .. •• •• •• PROJECT NO. 92-0184 SAMPLE NO. 63807 SOURCE: JOHNSON CONTROLS STATION ID: JCSS03 CASE. NO.: 0 SAS NO.: NC SAMPLE TYPE: SOIL PROG ELEM: NC CITY: . COLLECTION START: D. NO.: 5503 RESULTS UNITS PARAMETER 5.2U MG/KG CYANIDE COLLECTED BY: B SCOTT ST: NC 06/25/91 1430 STOP: 00/00/00 MD NO: 5503 •••FOOTNOTES••* •A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT. - ---- - - - SPECIFIED ANALYSIS DATA REPORT ----SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA. ------12/11/91 •••••••••••• * •••••••• * •• * ••••••••• • • • • • * • * • • • • • • • • • • • • • • * • • • • • • • • ... .. •• •• .. u PROJECT NO. 92-0184 SAMPLE NO. 63806 SAMPLE TYPE: SOIL •• SOURCE: JOHNSON CONTROLS •• STATION ID: JCSB01 u CASE. NO. : 0 SAS NO. : NC .. PROG ELEM: NC COLLECTED BY: B SCOTT CITY: ST: NC COLLECTION START: 06/25/91 1245 STOP: 00/00/00 D. NO.: SB01 MD NO: SB01 RESULTS UNITS PARAMETER 5.5U MG/KG CYANIDE •••FOOTNOTES••" .. •A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT. - --- - - - - --- - - SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA. -- - - SPECIFIED ANALYSIS DATA REPORT • * * • • * • • • • * * • • • * • • * • • • * • • • • • * • • • • • * • * • * • • • • • • * • • • * • • * • • • • • ••• •• •• •• •• •• PROJECT NO. 92-0184 SAMPLE NO. 63804 SAMPLE TYPE: SOIL SOURCE: JOHNSON CONTROLS STATION ID: JCSB02 CASE.NO.: 0 SAS NO.: NC PROG ELEM: NC CITY: COLLECTION START: D. NO.: SB02 RESULTS UNITS PARAMETER 5.8U MG/KG CYANIDE COLLECTED BY: B SCOTT ST: NC 06/25/91 1345 STOP: 00/00/00 MD NO: SB02 --12/11/91 • •• •• •• •• ** ** •••FOOTNOTES••• •A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAJ-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTJMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE JS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER JS THE MINIMUM QUANTJTATION LIMIT. - I I I I .. I I I I . I I I ,, I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Region IV Environmental Services Division College Station Road, Athens, Ga. 30613 *****MEMORANDUM****** DA TE: 12 / 12 / 9 1 SUBJECT: Results of Purgeable Organic Analysis; 92-0 JOHNSON CONTROLS FROM: drt . Zv---.c,,,_,. :C valuation/Quality Assurance Section TO: AL HANKE Attached are the results of analysis of samples collected as part of the subject project. As a result of the Quality Assurance Review, certain data qualifiers may have been placed on the data. Attached is a DATA QUALIFIER REPORT which explains the reasons that the~e qualifiers were required. If you have any questions please contact me. ATTACHMENT I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ORGANIC DAT/\ QUALIFIER REPORT Case Number Carolina Power & Light (Cape Fear) Johnso11 Controls Affected Samples Compound or Fraction Volatiles none F'lag Used Reason Project No. 92-0185 92-0184 Extractables 63813 all base/neutrals R unacceptable surrogate recovery Pesticides none -- - -- PURGEABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT *** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * •• PROJECT NO. 92-0184 SAMPLE •• SOURCE: JOHNSON CONTROLS •• STATION ID: JCSS01 - * * * * * NO. 63809 - - - ---SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA. ********** ••• **"***** SAMPLE TYPE: SOIL PROG ELEM: NC CITY: - - - - ***************** COLLECTED BY: B SCOTT ST: NC COLLECTION START: 06/25/91 1110 STOP: 00/00/00 D. NO.: SS01 - - 12/11/91 ••• .. .. .. .. .. .. •• CASE NO.: 0 SAS NO. NC *** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *** UG/KG ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/KG ANALYTICAL RESULTS 11U CHLOROMETHANE 11U BROMOMETHANE 11U VINYL CHLORIDE 11U CHLOROETHANE 11U METHYLENE CHLORIDE 11 U ACETONE 11U CARBON DISULFIDE 11U 1 ,l-DICHLOROETHENE(l,1-DICHLOROETHYLENEJ 11U 1 ,1-DICHLOROETHANE 11U 1 ,2-DICHLOROETHENE (TOTAL) 11U CHLOROFORM 11U 1,2-DICHLOROETHANE 11U METHYL ETHYL KETONE 11U 1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE 11U CARBON TETRACHLORIDE 11U BROMODICHLOROMETHANE •••REMARKS••• 11U 1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE 11U CIS-1 .3-DICHLOROPROPENE 11U TRICHLOROETHENE(TRICHLOROETHYLENE) 11U DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE 11U 1 ,1 ,2-TRICHLOROETHANE 11 U BENZENE 11U TRANS-1 ,3-DICHLOROPROPENE 11U BROMOFORM 11U METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE 11U METHYL BUTYL KETONE l1U TETRACHLOROETHENE(TETRACHLOROETHYLENE) 11U 1 ,1,2.2-TETRACHLOROETHANE 11U TOLUENE 11U CHLOROBENZENE 11U ETHYL BENZENE 11U STYRENE 11U TOTAL XYLENES 10 PERCENT MOISTURE •••FOOTNOTES••• •A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT. •R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION. - -- -- - PURGEABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT ••• * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * PROJECT NO. 92-0184 SAMPLE SOURCE: JOHNSON CONTROLS STATION ID: JCSS02 - * * * * * NO. 63808 - ---- - SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION JV ESD, ATHENS. GA. * * * * * * * * * * • • • SAMPLE TYPE: SOIL * * * * * * * * PROG ELEM: NC CITY: - - - - * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * COLLECTED BY: B SCOTT ST: NC COLLECTION START: 06/25/91 1130 STOP: 00/00/00 - - 12/11/91 ••• •• •• •• • • •• •• •• •• •• •• CASE NO.: 0 SAS NO. NC D. NO.: SS02 *** * * * * * * * * * * * * • * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * • * * * * * * * *** UG/KG ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/KG ANALYTICAL RESULTS 11U CHLOROMETHANE 11U BROMOMETHANE 11U VINYL CHLORIDE 11U CHLOROETHANE 11U METHYLENE CHLORIDE 20U ACETONE 11U CARBON DISULFIDE 11U 1 .1-DICHLOROETHENE(1 .1-DICHLOROETHYLENE) 11U 1 .1-DICHLOROETHANE 11U 1 .2-DICHLOROETHENE (TOTAL) 11U CHLOROFORM 11U 1,2-DICHLOROETHANE 11U METHYL ETHYL KETONE 11U 1 .1. 1-TRICHLOROETHANE 11U CARBON TETRACHLORIDE 11U BROMODICHLOROMETHANE 11U 1 .2-DICHLOROPROPANE 11U CJS-1.3-DICHLOROPROPENE 11U TRICHLOROETHENE(TRICHLOROETHYLENEJ 11U DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE 11U 1 .1 .2-TRICHLOROETHANE 11U BENZENE 11U TRANS-1.3-DICHLOROPROPENE 11U BROMOFORM 11U METHYL !SOBUTYL KETONE 11U METHYL BUTYL KETONE 11U TETRACHLOROETHENE(TETRACHLOROETHYLENE) 11U 1.1 .2.2-TETRACHLOROETHANE 11U TOLUENE 11U CHLOROBENZENE 11U ETHYL BENZENE 11U STYRENE 11U TOTAL XYLENES 13 PERCENT MOISTURE •••FOOTNOTES••• •A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTJMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTJTATJON LIMIT. •R-OC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION. - -- -- - -- --- - - SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION JV ESD. ATHENS, GA. - - -- --12/11/91 PURGEABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT *** * * • * * * ••• * * • * •• * * * • * ••• * * * * ••• * •.• * * * • * ••• * * * * ••• * •• * • * * •••• • • • ••• •• •• •• .. .. •• PROJECT NO. 92-0184 SAMPLE NO. 63807 SAMPLE TYPE: SOIL •• SOURCE: JOHNSON CONTROLS •• STATION ID: JCSS03 PROG ELEM: NC COLLECTED BY: B SCOTT CITY: ST: NC COLLECTION START: 06/25/91 1430 STOP: 00/00/00 D. NO.: 5503 •• •• CASE NO.: 0 SAS NO.: NC ••• • • • • • • • • • • * •• * * * * * • * * * • * • * •••••••••• * • * * •••••• * •• * ••••• * ••••••••• UG/KG ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/KG ANALYTICAL RESULTS 11U CHLOROMETHANE 11U BROMOMETHANE 11U VINYL CHLORIDE 11U CHLOROETHANE 11U METHYLENE CHLORIDE 11 U ACETONE 11U CARBON DISULFIDE 11U 1.1-DICHLOROETHENE(l,1-DICHLOROETHYLENE) 11U 1.1-DJCHLOROETHANE 11U 1,2-D!CHLOROETHENE (TOTAL) 11 U CHLOROFORM 11U 1 .2-DICHLOROETHANE 11U METHYL ETHYL KETONE 11U 1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE 11U CARBON TETRACHLORIDE 11U BROMODJCHLOROMETHANE •*•REMARKS••• 11U 1.2-DICHLOROPROPANE 11U CIS-1 ,3-DICHLOROPROPENE 11U TRICHLOROETHENE(TRICHLOROETHYLENE) 11U DIBRDMOCHLORDMETHANE 11U 1. 1 .2-TRICHLOROETHANE 11 U BENZENE 11U TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE 11 U BROMOFORM 11U METHYL JSDBUTYL KETONE 11U METHYL BUTYL KETONE 11U TETRACHLOROETHENE(TETRACHLOROETHYLENE) 11U 1,1 ,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE 11 U TOLUENE 11U CHLORDBENZENE 11U ETHYL BENZENE 11U STYRENE 11U TOTAL XYLENES 10 PERCENT MOISTURE •••REMARKS••• •••FOOTNOTES••* •A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTJMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTJTATIDN LIMIT. •R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLJNG AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION. - ------ PURGEABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT -----SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS. GA. ----- - 12/11/91 *** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * • * * * • * * * * * * * * * * * * * • * * * * * • * * * * • * * * * * * • • • ... •• •• •• •• •• •• PROJECT NO. 92-0184 SAMPLE NO. 63806 SAMPLE TYPE: SOIL •• SOURCE: JOHNSON CONTROLS *' STATION ID: JCSBOl .. •• CASE NO.· 0 SAS NO.: NC PROG ELEM: NC COLLECTED BY: B SCOTT CITY: ST: NC COLLECTION START: 06/25/91 1245 STOP: 00/00/00 D. NO.: SBOl *** * * • * * * * * * * * * * •• * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * • * * * * • * * * * • * * * • * * * • * * • * *** UG/KG ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/KG ANALYTICAL RESULTS 11 U 11 U 11 U 11 U 11 U 20U 11 U . 11 U 11 U 11 U 11 U 11 U 11 U 11 U 11 U 11 U CHLOROMETHANE BROMOMETHANE VINYL CHLORIDE CHLOROETHANE METHYLENE CHLORIDE ACETONE CARBON DISULFIDE 1 ,1-DICHLOROETHENE(1. 1-DICHLOROETHYLENEJ 1 .1-DJCHLOROETHANE 1 ,2-DJCHLOROETHENE (TOTAL) CHLOROFORM 1 .2-DICHLOROETHANE METHYL ETHYL KETONE 1 ,1 .1-TRICHLOROETHANE CARBON TETRACHLORIDE BROMODICHLOROMETHANE •••REMARKS••• •••FOOTNOTES••• 11 U 11 U 11 U 11 U 11 U 11 U 11 U 11 U 11 U 11 U 11 U 11 U 11 U 11 U 11 U 11 U 11 U 10 1 ,2-DICHLOROPROPANE CIS-1 .3-DICHLOROPROPENE TRICHLOROETHENE(TRICHLOROETHYLENEJ DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE 1,1 .2-TRICHLOROETHANE BENZENE TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE BROMOFORM METHYL JSOBUTYL KETONE METHYL BUTYL KETONE TETRACHLOROETHENE(TETRACHLOROETHYLENEJ 1 ,1.2.2-TETRACHLOROETHANE TOLUENE CHLOROBENZENE ETHYL BENZENE STYRENE TOTAL XYLENES PERCENT MOISTURE •••REMARKS••• •A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTJMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT. •R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION. - llliill liili - PURGEABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT ... * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * PROJECT NO. 92-0184 SAMPLE SOURCE: JOHNSON CONTROLS STATION ID: JCSB02 * * * * * NO. 63804 ----SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION JV ESD. ATHENS. GA. * * * * * * * * * * • • • ******** SAMPLE TYPE: SOIL PROG ELEM: NC CITY: --- - * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * COLLECTED BY: B SCOTT ST: NC COLLECTION START: 06/25/91 1345 STOP: 00/00/00 D. NO.: SB02 --12/11/91 ... •• •• •• •• •• •• •• ** •• •• CASE NO.: 0 SAS NO. NC *** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * • * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *** UG/KG ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/KG ANALYTICAL RESULTS 12U CHLOROMETHANE 12U BROMOMETHANE 12U VINYL CHLORIDE 12U CHLOROETHANE 12U METHYLENE CHLORIDE 12.U ACETONE 12U CARBON DISULFIDE 12U 1,1-DICHLOROETHENE(l. 1-DICHLOROETHYLENE) 12U 1,1-DICHLOROETHANE 12U 1.2-DICHLOROETHENE (TOTAL) 12U CHLOROFORM 12U 1,2-DICHLOROETHANE 12U METHYL ETHYL KETONE 12U 1.1.1-TRICHLOROETHANE 12U CARBON TETRACHLORIDE 12U BROMODICHLOROMETHANE 12U 1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE 12U CJS-1 .3-DJCHLOROPROPENE 12U TR!CHLOROETHENE(TRICHLOROETHYLENE) 12U DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE 12U 1,1,2-TRJCHLOROETHANE 12U BENZENE 12U TRANS-1 ,3-DICHLOROPROPENE 12U BROMOFORM 12U METHYL JSOBUTYL KETONE 12U METHYL BUTYL KETONE 12U TETRACHLOROETHENE(TETRACHLOROETHYLENE) 12U 1,1,2.2-TETRACHLOROETHANE 12U TOLUENE 12U CHLOROBENZENE 12U ETHYL BENZENE 12U STYRENE 12U TOTAL XYLENES 15 PERCENT MOISTURE •••FOOTNOTES••• •A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAJ-JNTERFERENCES •J-ESTJMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE JS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE JS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER JS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT. •R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS JS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION. - ,.. I I l' I I I I .,,,,... . I I I II I I I I I I H f I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ,, ,, ,. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AG Region Iv· Environmental Services Division College Station Road, Athens, Ga. 3061 *****MEMORANDUM****** DATE: 12/12/91 SUBJECT: Results of Extractable Organic Analysis; !?,O ;,1J:HN:O~ CON~~OLS FROM: l~ig Chief, Laboratory E luation/Quality Assurance Section TO: AL HANKE Attached are the results of analysis of samples collected as part of the subject project. As a result of the Quality Assurance Review, certain data qualifiers may have been placed on the data. Attached is a DATA QUALIFIER REPORT which ·explains the reasons that these qualifiers were required. If you have any questions please contact me. ATTACHMENT I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ORGANIC DATA QUALIFIER REPORT Case Number Carolina Power & Light (Cape Fear) Johnson Controls Affected Samples Compound or Fraction Volatiles none Flag Used Reason Project No. 92-0185 92-0184 Extractables 63813 all base/neutrals R unacceptable surrogate recovery Pesticides none --- - - --- - - - --- - - EXTRACTABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT ... .. .. .. .. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * PROJECT NO. 92-0184 SAMPLE NO. 63809 SOURCE: JOHNSON CONTROLS STATION ID: JCSS01 SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION JV ESD. ATHENS, GA. * * * * * * * * * * ••• * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * SAMPLE TYPE: SOIL PROG ELEM: NC CITY: COLLECTED BY: B SCOTT ST: NC COLLECTION START: 06/25/91 1110 STOP: 00/00/00 - - 12/11/91 ... .. .. .. .. .. ** CASE NO. 0 SAS NO. NC *** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * • * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *** UG/KG ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/KG ANALYTICAL RESULTS D. NO.: SS01 360U 360U 360U 360U 360U 360U 360U 360U 360U 360U 360U 360U 360U 360U 360U 360U 360U 360U 360U 360U 360U 360U 360U 360U 360U 360U 360U 880U 360U 360U 360U PHENOL BIS(2-CHLOROETHYL) ETHER 2-CHLOROPHENOL 1 ,3-DICHLOROBENZENE 1 ,4-DICHLOROBENZENE 1 ,2-DICHLOROBENZENE 2-METHYLPHENOL 2.2'-CHLOROISOPROPYLETHER (3-AND/OR 4-)METHYLPHENOL N-NITROSODI-N-PROPYLAMINE HEXACHLOROETHANE N!TROBENZENE ISOPHORONE 2-N !TROPHENOL 2,4-DIMETHYLPHENOL BIS(2-CHLOROETHOXYJ METHANE 2,4-DICHLOROPHENOL 1 ,2.4-TRICHLOROBENZENE NAPHTHALENE 4-CHLOROAN I LI NE HEXACHLOROBUTADIENE 4-CHLOR0-3-METHYLPHENOL 2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE HEXACHLOROCYCLOPENTADIENE (HCCP) 2.4.6-TRICHLOROPHENOL 2,4,5-TRICHLOROPHENOL 2-CHLORONAPHTHALENE 2-N!TROANILINE DIMETHYL PHTHALATE ACENAPHTHYLENE 2.6-DINITROTOLUENE 880U 360U 880U 880U 360U 360U 360U 360U 360U 880U 880U 360U 360U 360U 880U 360U 360U 360U 360U 360U 360U 360U 360U 360U 360U 360U 360U 360U 360U 360U 360U 360U 10 3-N!TROANILINE ACENAPHTHENE 2.4-DINITROPHENOL 4-N!TROPHENOL DIBENZOFURAN 2,4-DINITROTOLUENE DIETHYL PHTHALATE 4-CHLOROPHENYL PHENYL ETHER FLUORENE 4-NITROANILINE 2-METHYL-4,6-DINITROPHENOL N-NJTROSODIPHENYLAMINE/DIPHENYLAMINE 4-BROMOPHENYL PHENYL ETHER HEXACHLOROBENZENE (HCBJ PENTACHLOROPHENOL PHENANTHRENE ANTHRACENE CARBAZOLE DI-N-BUTYLPHTHALATE FLUORANTHENE PYRENE BENZYL BUTYL PHTHALATE 3,3'-DICHLOROBENZIDINE BENZO(A)ANTHRACENE CHRYSENE BIS(2-ETHYLHEXYLJ PHTHALATE DI-N-OCTYLPHTHALATE BENZO(B AND/OR K)FLUORANTHENE BENZO-A-PYRENE INDENO (1 .2.3-CDJ PYRENE DIBENZO(A,HJANTHRACENE BENZO(GHIJPERYLENE PERCENT MOISTURE •••FOOTNOTES••• •A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM OUANTITATION LIMIT. •R-OC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION. - --- - - - - - - - - - SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA. - - - ---12/11/91 MISCELLANEOUS EXTRACTABLE COMPOUNDS -DATA REPORT • • • • • • • * • • * • • • • * • * * • • • * * • • . . ' ••• •• •• ••• •• •• •• •• •• • * • * • • • • • • • * • • • • * • • • • • • * * * • • • * • PROJECT NO. 92-0184 SAMPLE NO. 63809 SAMPLE TYPE: SOIL SOURCE: JOHNSON CONTROLS STATION ID: JCSSOl CASE.NO.: 0 SAS NO.: NC 20000JN 1000J ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/KG HEXANEDIOJC ACID, DIOCTYLESTER 2 UNIDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS ' ' PROG ELEM: NC CITY: COLLECTION START: D. NO.: SS01 COLLECTED BY: B SCOTT ST: NC 06/25/91 1110 STOP: 00/00/00 MD NO: SSOl '' •• • • •••FOOTNOTES••• •A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE JS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE JS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U-MATERJAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATJON LIMIT. •R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION. - ----- -- - - -- - SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS. GA. ---- - - 12/11/91 EXTRACTABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * • • • * * * * * * * * **"'*****"********* ••• ••• •• .. ... •• •• •• •• PROJECT NO. 92-0184 SAMPLE NO. 63808 SOURCE: JOHNSON CONTROLS STATION ID: JCSS02 SAMPLE TYPE: SOIL PROG ELEM: NC CITY: COLLECTED BY: B SCOTT COLLECTION START: 06/25/91 ST: NC 1130 STOP: 00/00/00 •• • • •• •• CASE NO.: 0 SAS NO.: NC D. NO.: 5502 *** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ~ • * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *.* * * * * * * * * * *. * * * * *** UG/KG ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/KG ANALYTICAL RESULTS 370U 370U 370U 370U 370U 370U 370U 370U 370U 370U 370U 370U 370U 370U 370U 370U 370U 370U 370U 370U 370U 370U 370U 370U 370U 910U 370U 910U 370U 370U 370U PHENOL BIS(2-CHLOROETHYL) ETHER 2-CHLOROPHENOL 1 .3-DICHLOROBENZENE 1 ,4-DICHLOROBENZENE 1 .2-DICHLOROBENZENE 2-METHYLPHENOL 2.2'-CHLOROISOPROPYLETHER (3-AND/OR 4-)METHYLPHENOL N-NITROSODI-N-PROPYLAMINE HEXACHLOROETHANE NITROBENZENE ISOPHORONE 2-NITROPHENOL 2.4-DIMETHYLPHENOL BIS(2-CHLOROETHOXY) METHANE 2.4-DICHLOROPHENOL 1 .2.4-TRICHLOROBENZENE NAPHTHALENE 4-CHLOROANI LI NE HEXACHLOROBUTADIENE 4-CHLOR0-3-METHYLPHENOL 2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE HEXACHLOROCYCLOPENTADIENE (HCCP) 2.4.6-TRICHLOROPHENOL 2,4,5-TRICHLOROPHENOL 2-CHLORONAPHTHALENE 2-NITROANILINE DIMETHYL PHTHALATE ACENAPHTHYLENE 2.6-DINITROTOLUENE 910U 370U 910U 910U 370U 370U 370U 370U 370U 910U 910U 370U 370U 370U 910U 370U 370U 370U 370U 370U 370U 370U 370U 370U 370U 370U 370U 370U 370U 370U 370U 370U 13 3-NITROANILINE ACENAPHTHENE 2.4-DIN!TROPHENOL 4-NITROPHENOL DIBENZOFURAN 2.4-DINITROTOLUENE DIETHYL PHTHALATE 4-CHLOROPHENYL PHENYL ETHER FLUORENE 4-NITROANILINE 2-METHYL-4.6-DINITROPHENOL N-N!TROSOD!PHENYLAMINE/DIPHENYLAMINE 4-BROMOPHENYL PHENYL ETHER HEXACHLOROBENZENE (HCBJ PENTACHLOROPHENOL PHENANTHRENE ANTHRACENE CARBAZOLE DI-N-BUTYLPHTHALATE FLUORANTHENE PYRENE BENZYL BUTYL PHTHALATE 3.3'-DICHLOROBENZIDINE BENZO(AJANTHRACENE CHRYSENE BIS(2-ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE DI-N-OCTYLPHTHALATE BENZO(B AND/OR KJFLUORANTHENE BENZO-A-PYRENE INDENO (1 .2.3-CDJ.PYRENE DIBENZO(A.H)ANTHRACENE BENZO(GHIJPERYLENE PERCENT MOISTURE •••FOOTNOTES••• •A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •LI-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANT!TATION LIMIT. •R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS JS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION. - -- - ------- - -SAMPLE AND ANALYSfS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS. GA. MISCELLANEOUS EXTRACTABLE COMPOUN°DS -DATA REPORT ---- ... ** '* .. • • * • * • • • • • * • • * • * • • • • • • • • • • • • * • * * * ·-····· • • • • • • ~ • • • • • * • • • • • '* '* PROJECT NO. 92-0184 SAMPLE NO. 63808 SOURCE: JOHNSON CONTROLS STATION ID: JCSS02 CASE .NO.: 0 SAS NO.: NC SAMPLE TYPE: SOIL 2000J ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/KG 3 UNIDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS •••FOOTNOTES••• PROG ELEM: NC CITY: COLLECTION START: D. NO.: SS02 COLLECTED BY: B SCOTT ST: NC 06/25/91 1130 STOP: 00/00/00 MD NO: SS02 - - 12/11/91 ... ** .. ** ** .. •A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT. •R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION. ----- - -- - - - - SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD. ATHENS, GA. -- - - - - 12/11/91 EXTRACTABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT * *· * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ••• •· * * * * * * * * *· * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * • • • ••• .. ... •• •• .. .. PROJECT NO. 92-0184 SAMPLE NO. 63807 SOURCE: JOHNSON CONTROLS STATION ID: JCSS03 SAMPLE TYPE: SOIL PROG ELEM: NC CITY: COLLECTION START: COLLECTED BY: B SCOTT ST: NC 06/25/91 1430 STOP: 00/00/00 •• .. .. .. •• CASE NO. 0 SAS NO. NC D. NO.: SS03 *** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ~ * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *** UG/KG ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/KG ANALYTICAL RESULTS 36DU 360U 360U 360U 360U 360U 360U 360U 360U 360U 360U 360U 360U 360U 360U 360U 360U 360U 360U 360U 360U 360U 360U 360U 360U 880U 360U 880U 360U 360U 360U PHENOL B!S(2-CHLOROETHYL) ETHER 2-CHLOROPHENOL. 1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE 1 ,4-DICHLOROBENZENE 1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE 2-METHYLPHENOL 2.2'-CHLORO!SOPROPYLETHER (3-AND/OR 4-)METHYLPHENOL N-NITROSOD!-N-PROPYLAMINE HEXACHLOROETHANE N!TROBENZENE ISOPHORONE 2-N!TROPHENDL 2.4-DIMETHYLPHENOL BIS(2-CHLOROETHOXY) METHANE 2,4-DICHLOROPHENOL 1 ,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE NAPHTHALENE 4-CHLOROAN I LI NE HEXACHLOROBUTADIENE 4-CHLOR0-3-METHYLPHENOL 2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE HEXACHLOROCYCLOPENTADIENE (HCCP) 2.4,6-TRICHLOROPHENOL 2,4,5-TRICHLOROPHENOL 2-CHLORONAPHTHALENE 2-N I TROAN I LI NE DIMETHYL PHTHALATE ACENAPHTHYLENE 2.6-DINITROTOLUENE 880U 360U 880U 880U 360U 360U 360U 360U 360U 880U 880U 360U 360U 36DU 880U 360U 360U 360U 360U 360U 360U 360U 360U 360U 360U 360U 360U 360U 360U 360U 360U 360U 10 3-N!TROAN!LINE ACENAPHTHENE 2,4-DINITROPHENOL 4-N!TROPHENOL D!BENZOFURAN 2,4-DINITROTOLUENE DIETHYL PHTHALATE 4-CHLOROPHENYL PHENYL ETHER FLUORENE 4-N!TROANILINE 2-METHYL-4.6-DIN!TROPHENOL N-NITROSODIPHENYLAMINE/OIPHENYLAMINE 4-BROMOPHENYL PHENYL ETHER HEXACHLOROBENZENE (HCBJ PENTACHLOROPHENOL PHENANTHRENE ANTHRACENE CARBAZOLE DI-N-BUTYLPHTHALATE FLUORANTHENE PYRENE BENZYL BUTYL PHTHALATE 3,3'-0ICHLOROBENZIDINE BENZO(A)ANTHRACENE CHRYSENE BIS(2-ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE OI-N-OCTYLPHTHALATE BENZO(B AND/OR K)FLUORANTHENE BENZO-A-PYRENE INDENO (1 ,2,3-CD) PYRENE DIBENZO(A,HJANTHRACENE BENZO(GHIJPERYLENE PERCENT MOISTURE •••FOOTNOTES••• •A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITAT!ON LIMIT. •R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION. - - ---- - -- - - - SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS.MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA. MISCELLANEOUS EXTRACTABLE COMPOUNDS -DATA REPORT ••• •• •• .. •• .. *** * **************** * * * * * * * * * * PROJECT NO. 92-0184 SAMPLE NO. 63807 SAMPLE TYPE: SOIL SOURCE: JOHNSON CONTROLS STATION ID: JCSS03 CASE. NO. : 0 SAS NO. : NC ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/KG 17 UNIDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS PETROLEUM PRODUCT • • • 20000J N lOOOOJN HEXANEDIO!C ACID. DIOCTYLESTER PROG ELEM: NC CITY: COLLECTION START: D. NO.: 5503 - - - COLLECTED BY: B SCOTT ST: NC - 06/25/91 1430 STOP: 00/00/00 MD NO: 5503 - - 12/11/91 • • • ••• .. •• .. •• .. •••FOOTNOTES••• •A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATIDN LIMIT. •R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION. - --- -- - - - --SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA. --- ---12/11/91 EXTRACTABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT • • * • * * * • * • • * • * * * • * * • • * * • * * * • * • * * * * • * • • * * * * * * • * * * • * • * • • • * * • • * * * ... •• ** ** •• *** SAMPLE TYPE: SOIL PROG ELEM: NC CITY: COLLECTED BY: B SCOTT PROJECT NO. 92-0184 SAMPLE NO. 63806 SOURCE: JOHNSON CONTROLS STATION ID: JCSBOl COLLECTION START: 06/25/91 ST: NC 1245 STOP: 00/00/00 ** ** •• ** •• CASE NO.: 0 SAS NO.: NC 0. NO.: S801 *" ••• * • * * * ••• * * * • * •••••• * •••• * * •• * ••••• ~ • * * •• * * * ••• * •• * • * • * •• * • * • * •••• UG/KG ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/KG ANALYTICAL RESULTS 360U PHENOL 360U BIS(2-CHLOROETHYL) ETHER 360U 2-CHLOROPHENOL 360U 1,3-D!CHLOROBENZENE 360U 1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE 360U 1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE 360U 2-METHYLPHENOL 360U 2,2'-CHLORO!SOPROPYLETHER 360U (3-AND/OR 4-)METHYLPHENDL 360U N-NITROSODI-N-PROPYLAMINE 360U HEXACHLOROETHANE 360U NITROBENZENE 360U ISOPHORONE 360U 2-N!TROPHENOL 360U 2,4-DIMETHYLPHENOL 360U BIS(2-CHLOROETHOXY) METHANE 360U 2,4-DICHLOROPHENOL 360U 1 ,2,4-TR!CHLOROBENZENE 360U NAPHTHALENE 360U 4-CHLOROANILINE 360U HEXACHLOROBUTADIENE 360U 4-CHLOR0-3-METHYLPHENOL 360U 2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE 360U HEXACHLOROCYCLOPENTADIENE (HCCPJ 360U 2,4,6-TRICHLOROPHENOL 88QU,✓ 2, 4, 5-TRI CHLOROPHENOL 360U 2-CHLORONAPHTHALENE 880U 2-NITROANILINE 360U DIMETHYL PHTHALATE 360U ACENAPHTHYLENE 360U· 2,6-DINITROTOLUENE 880U 3-NITROANILINE 360U ACENAPHTHENE 880U 2,4-DINITROPHENOL 880U 4-NITROPHENOL 360U DIBENZOFURAN 360U 2,4-DINITROTOLUENE 360U DIETHYL PHTHALATE 360U 4-CHLOROPHENYL PHENYL ETHER 360U FLUORENE 880U 4-NITROANILINE 880U 2-METHYL-4,6-DINITROPHENOL 360U N-NITROSODIPHENYLAMINE/DIPHENYLAMINE 360U 4-BROMOPHENYL PHENYL ETHER 360U HEXACHLOROBENZENE (HCB) 880U PENTACHLOROPHENOL 360U PHENANTHRENE 360U ANTHRACENE 360U CARBAZOLE 360U DI-N-BUTYLPHTHALATE 360U FLUORANTHENE 360U PYRENE 360U BENZYL BUTYL PHTHALATE 360U 3,3'-DICHLOROBENZIDINE 360U BENZO(A)ANTHRACENE 360U CHRYSENE 360UL BIS(2-ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE 360U DI-N-OCTYLPHTHALATE 360U BENZO(B AND/OR K)FLUORANTHENE 360U BENZO-A-PYRENE 360U INDENO (1 ,2,3-CD) PYRENE 360U DIBENZO(A,H)ANTHRACENE 360U BENZO(GHIJPERYLENE 10 PERCENT MOISTURE •••FOOTNOTES"** •A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM QUANTITATION LIMIT. •R-QC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION. - ----- - - - ---SAMPLE AND ANALYSIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EPA-REGION IV ESD, ATHENS, GA. -- - - EXTRACTABLE ORGANICS DATA REPORT * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * • • • * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ••• •• •• .. .. PROJECT NO. 92-0184 SAMPLE NO. 63804 SAMPLE TYPE: SOIL SOURCE: JOHNSON CONTROLS STATION ID: JCSB02 PROG ELEM: NC CITY: COLLECTED BY: B SCOTT COLLECTION START: 06/25/91 ST: NC 1345 STOP: 00/00/00 - - 12/11/91 * * * * ... •• •• .. •• •• ** CASE NO.: *** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ·* * * * * * * * * * * • * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *· * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *** UG/KG ANALYTICAL RESULTS UG/KG ANALYTICAL RESULTS 0 SAS NO. NC D. NO.: SB02 38ou· 380U 380U 380U 380U 380U 380U 380U 380U 380U 380U 38ou1 380U 380U 380U 380U 380U 380U 380U 3l30U 380U 380U 380U 380U 380U 930U 380U 930Ui\ 380U 380U, 380U PHENOL BIS(2-CHLOROETHYLJ ETHER 2-CHLOROPHENOL 1 ,3-DICHLOROBENZENE 1 ,4-DICHLOROBENZENE 1 ,2-DICHLOROBENZENE 2-METHYLPHENOL 2,2'~CHLOROISOPROPYLETHER (3-AND/OR 4-)METHYLPHENOL N-NITROSODI-N-PROPYLAMINE HEXACHLOROETHANE NITROBENZENE ISOPHORONE 2-NITROPHENOL 2,4-DIMETHYLPHENOL BIS(2-CHLOROETHOXY) METHANE 2,4-DICHLOROPHENOL 1 ,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE NAPHTHALENE 4-CHLOROAN I LI NE HEXACHLOROBUTADIENE 4-CHLOR0-3-METHYLPHENOL 2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE HEXACHLOROCYCLOPENTADIENE (HCCP) 2,4,6-TRICHLOROPHENOL 2,4,5-TRICHLOROPHENOL 2-CHLORONAPHTHALENE 2-NITROANILINE DIMETHYL PHTHALATE ACENAPHTHYLENE 2,6-DINITROTOLUENE 930U 380U 930U 930U 380U 380U 380U 380U 380U 930U 930U 380U 380U 380U 930U 380U 380U 380U 380U 380U 380U 380U 380U 380U 380U 380U 380U 380U 380U 380U 380U 380U 15 3-N!TROANILINE ACENAPHTHENE 2.4-DINITROPHENOL 4-NITROPHENOL DIBENZOFURAN 2,4-DINITROTOLUENE DIETHYL PHTHALATE 4-CHLOROPHENYL PHENYL ETHER FLUORENE 4-NITROANILINE 2-METHYL-4,6-DINITROPHENOL N-NITROSODIPHENYLAMINE/DIPHENYLAMINE 4-BROMOPHENYL PHENYL ETHER HEXACHLOROBENZENE (HCB) PENTACHLOROPHENOL PHENANTHRENE ANTHRACENE CARBAZOLE DI-N-BUTYLPHTHALATE FLUORANTHENE PYRENE BENZYL BUTYL PHTHALATE 3,3'-DICHLOROBENZIDINE BENZO(A)ANTHRACENE CHRYSENE BIS(2-ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE DI-N-OCTYLPHTHALATE BENZO(B AND/OR K)FLUORANTHENE BENZO-A-PYRENE INDENO (1 ,2,3-CD) PYRENE DIBENZO(A,H)ANTHRACENE BENZO(GHl)PERYLENE PERCENT MOISTURE •••FOOTNOTES••• •A-AVERAGE VALUE •NA-NOT ANALYZED •NAI-INTERFERENCES •J-ESTIMATED VALUE •N-PRESUMPTIVE EVIDENCE OF PRESENCE OF MATERIAL •K-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN VALUE GIVEN •L-ACTUAL VALUE IS KNOWN TO BE GREATER THAN VALUE GIVEN •U-MATERIAL WAS ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED. THE NUMBER IS THE MINIMUM OUANTITATION LIMIT. •R-OC INDICATES THAT DATA UNUSABLE. COMPOUND MAY OR MAY NOT BE PRESENT. RESAMPLING AND REANALYSIS IS NECESSARY FOR VERIFICATION. -