The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutNC0001606250_20021011_Cristex Drum_FRBCERCLA RI_Phase I Remedial Investigation Workplan - Volume I-OCRREC-LEAD PHASE I REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION WORKPLAN CRISTEX FACILITY OXFORD, NORTH CAROLINA VOLUME I REPORT TEXT, TABLES AND APPENDICES B -G MP?;~Il~◊N!JS: E11gineering & E111'ironmen10/ Solu1ions • REC-LEAD PHASE I REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION WORKPLAN CRISTEX FACILITY OXFORD, NORTH CAROLIN{\-~-.·-.-. if-~~.~ ! , r~ \~ lG _f2-.-~ ----''··-, I\ I : VOLUME I i;l.i~• I\ 111 •11·,1 \ L} \ · ! U ll' OCT l 1 2002 I :,; I \ _____ _j Prepared for: Leonhardt Environmental 3208 Twin Leaf Drive Raleigh, North Carolina 27613 Prepared by: Mid-Atlantic Associates, P.A. 409 Rogers View Court Raleigh, North Carolina 27610 October 11, 2002 \ -.. -c•·1-11n'•, I '1\.' • • • 1\ C:; \ n r--'.·: ;u i' .': D J ~-~_'..:. .. i,:,_~·-'. .. : .. J l .':'. . · ........ -·- ·MP?;{\fl~❖N!J~ ll11ginr1•ri111; & En1'iro11mc111a/ So/111io11,1· REC CERTIFICATION FOR THE PHASE I REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION WORKPLAN PREPARED FOR THE CRISTEX FACIIL TY IN OXFORD, NORTH CAROLINA "I certify under penalty of law that I am personally familiar with the information contained in this submittal, includin'g any and all supporting documents accompanying this certification, and that the 'material and information contained herein is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete and complies with the Inactive Hazardous Sites Response Act G.S. 130A-310, et seq. And the voluntary remedial action program Rules 15A NCAC 13C .0300. I am aware that there are significant penalties for w_illfully submitting false, inaccurate or incomplete information." Kathleen A. Roush, P.G., RSM Date Before me personally appeared Ka..+hJ..uri A. +<.ou.J>h known to me to be the person described in and who executei:J the foregoing instrument, and acknowledge to and before me the --h.JI executed said instrument for the purposes therein expressed. WITNESS my hand and official seal, this _I_I _ day of Qe,,-l()b«, Notary Publich~ ~-lJ~(.Mb<J My commission expires Cl~ dlo) ;2oos AD, 2002 STATE OF -----------------'-fl C. COUNTY QF (;Jo.Ju OFFICIAL SEAL _.;•,(.~ BEVERLY R. OGLESBY 1.(;t!~ NOTARY PUBLIC· NORTH CAROLINA '·=· COUNTY OF WAAE My Commission Expires July 26, 2005. Notarized Declaration of the Remediating Party for the Remedial Investigation Workplan Prepared for the Cristex Facility in Oxford, North Carolina "I certify under penalty of law that I have personally examined and am familiar with the information contained in this submittal, including any and all documents accompanying this certification, and that, based on my inquiry of those individuals immediately responsible for obtaining the information, the material and information contained herein is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for willfully submitting false, inaccurate or incomplete information." Dat6 1 Before me personally appeared W!A &'(UIA Ct! /llSTtflJ!/Jknown to me to be the person described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged to and before me the aixJV<l. executed said instrument for the purposes therein expressed. WITNESS my hand and official seal, this _:!_ day of De TO I!, c /?,_ Notary Public OA,NtfL ((, CAµ Aae My commission expires __ 7_,_L/_,_/,,.(p"---1---(----"~""--"'o<-'o:::C_s_J_ __ _ AD, 2002 ST A TE of --'---"fJ'---=£=-iJ'--'---C;:r_,£=€.s'---"'=--=c'---'Y--COUNTY OF _,,(.1'----'----'-f.J-----'-( 0-----'--...:N __ _ (Official Seal) JJ~t-~ ;o-er -;2.oc>;J, DANIR R. CANADA A Nota,y Public 01 11w..., Illy Commission Expka 01/W21111f 0 M!l?;{\JlA~NTlS: Engineering & Envir(rnmental Solutions 409 Rogers View Court I Raleigh I North Carolina I 27610 800-486-7568 I 9/9-250-9918 I 9/9-250-9950 Facsimile WW\\'.lnlll/Ollline.com PHASE I REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION WORKPLAN CRISTEX FACILITY OXFORD, NORTH CAROLINA VOLUME I October 11, 2002 Mid-Atlantic Associates Job No. 098R0705.08 Prepared For: Leonhardt Environmental 3208 Twin Leaf Drive Raleigh, North Carolina 27613 Prepared By: MID-ATLANTIC ASSOCIATES, P.A . .,.. .. ..,n.,, Al. _ . ,P. i "~ , n O ,<,, rP ;!~~ c~~ v Y1J\f\-\i..l.0l,\AV'-\L--'\..J !;V °/~"'tENSj-;1'.., \ Kathleen A. Roush, P.G., RSMf SEAL i Senior Geologist 1 ~353 ;z: § ~Otari'~;,,.,~/ ,-.~~- . ~ ctor, P.G. Principal Environmental Geologist .• TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................. 1 1.1 General ....................................................................................... 1 1.2 Background Information ................................................................ 1 2.0 . SITE LOCATION INFORMATION -[.0306(g)( 1 ll ....................................... 2 3.0 CURRENT AND HISTORICAL SITE OPERATIONS -[.0306(g)(2)1 ............... 3 4.0 SITE MAPS -[.0306(g)(3) and (4)1 ......................................................... 4 5.0 LOCAL GEOLOGIC AND HYDROGEOLOGIC CONDITIONS -[.0306(g)(5)1 ... 4 6.0 IDENTIFICATION OF WELLS, SPRINGS, AND SURFACE WATER INTAKES - [.0306(g)(6)1 .............. ················ ....................................................... 5 7.0 IDENTIFICATION OF ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE AREAS - [.0306(g)(7)1 ..................................................................................... 6 8.0 CURRENT AND HISTORICAL SITE OWNERSHIP -[.0306(9)(8) and (9)1 ...... 6 9.0 OPERATIONAL HISTORY -[.0306(9)(10)1 ............................................... 7 10.0 HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES USED AT SITE -[.0306(9)(11 )l .................... 8 11.0 ENVIRONMENTAL PERMIT HISTORY -[.0306(9)( 12)1 .............................. 8 12.0 PREVIOUS ENVIRONMENTAL INVESTIGATIONS -[.0306(9)(13)1 .............. 9 - 13.0 PROCEDURES FOR SITE CHARACTERIZATION -[.0306(g)(14) and ( 15)1 ... 9 13.1 General 13.2 AOC-1 13.2.1 13.2.2 13.3 AOC-2 13.3.1 13.3.2 13.4 AOC-3 13.5 AOC-4 13.5.1 13.5.2 ···················································"··· ............................... 9 Former Drum Burial Area ................................................. 10 Confirmation of Remedial Activities ................................ 10 GeoProbe Borings ........................... ; ............................. 10 Former Oil/Water Separator and Drainage Ditch ................. 11 Identified Data Gaps ..................................................... 11 Geo Probe Borings ......................................................... 1 2 Aboveground Storage Tanks ............................................ 13 Lagoon ........................................................................ 13 Identified Data Gaps ..................................................... 13 Proposed Soil Sampling ................................................. 14 MP?;{\Jl~i}N!lS: H1111inFFl'i1111 ,I< E11l'iro11mc111a/ Sv/111io11s 0 • TABLE OF CONTENTS (CONTINUED) 13.6 AOC-5 Groundwater ................................................................ 14 13.6.1 Identified Data Gaps ..................................................... 14 13.6.2 Source Identification ..................................................... 15 13.6.3 Monitoring Well Installation ........................................... 16 13. 7 Surface Water Pathways ............................................................ 16 14.0 QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN -[.0306(9)(16)1 ........................ 17 15.0 ANALYTICAL METHODS AND PARAMETERS -[.0306(9)(17)] ................ 17 16.0 EQUIPMENT AND PERSONNEL DECONTAMINATION PROCEDURES - [.0306(9)( 18)] ................................................................................. 17 17 .0 HEAL TH AND SAFETY PLAN -[.0306(9)( 19)] ....................................... 1 7 DRAWINGS Drawing 1.1 Drawing 1.2 Drawing 4.1 Drawing 4.2 Drawing 4.3 Drawing 5.1 APPENDICES Appendix A Appendix B Appendix C Appendix D Appendix E Appendix F Appendix G Topographic Site Map Site Map Proposed Soil Sampling and Monitoring Well Location Map Excavation Areas Tetrachloroethene lsoconcentration Map Estimated Water Table Contour Map (6/6/01) Environmental Assessment Report, Cristex Facility, Oxford, NC Survey Plats Receptor Survey Data Sensitive Environments Survey Data Current Deed To Property Sampling and Analysis Plan Health and Safety Plan MP?;{\fl~~N!J~ En11ineering ,~ £111'/ro11me111a/ Sofotio11s • 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 General This Phase I Remedial Investigation Workplan (RIW), developed for the Cristex Facility in Oxford, North Carolina (Drawing 1 .1), is structured to meet applicable requirements contained in North Carolina General Statute 130-310.9(c) (Statute), 15A North Carolina Administrative Code (NCAC) 13C .0300 Rules (Rules), and the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources' (DENR) 15A NCAC 13C .0300 Registered Environmental Consultant (REC) Implementation Guidance (REC Guidance Document), for development and implementation of a RIW. Actions to be taken during implementation of the RIW will be performed in accordance with the aforementioned Statute, Rules, and REC Guidance Document. The purpose of the RIW is to complete the Remedial Investigation (RI) of Areas of Concern (AOC) identified during previous site investigations. Soil and groundwater assessment activities were conducted prior to the site enrolling in the REC program. As part of these activities, data necessary for the completion of Phase I activities were collected. This includes such tasks as identifying possible source areas and collecting and analyzing samples for the constituents of concern (COCs) that could be present. The work outlined in this RIW is designed to complete Phase I activities and assessment work to delineate the vertical and lateral extent of impact. Information presented in this RIW is based on: 1.2 • documentation from and interviews with personnel of Leonhardt Environmental, the firm responsible for environmental compliance issues for the Cristex Corporation, owner of the site; • documentation from the DENR Superfund Section project files In Raleigh, North Carolina; and, • documentation from persons, agencies, or corporations listed under the References section of this RIW. Background Information The Cristex Corporation, owner of the Cristex Facility in Oxford, North Carolina, entered into a Administrative Order on Consent (Consent Order) on April 10, 2002 with the Superfund Section. The Consent Order enrolled the site into the REC Program under the Inactive Sites Branch of the Superfund Section. MP?;~Ji~◊NTJS: Engineering & E.nl'ironmental So/11tions • Phase I Remedial Investigation Workplan Cristex Faclfity Oxford, North Carolina October 11, 2002 Page 2 Prior to entering the REC program, the EPA Emergency Response and Removal Branch (ERRB) removed 163 buried and partially buried drums located at the rear portion of the site on January 1, 1997 (Drawing 1.2). Contaminated soil beneath the drums was also reportedly excavated and removed. As a result of the removal action conducted by the ERRB, the Superfund Section conducted a Preliminary Assessment/ Site Investigation (PA/SI) and collected soil and groundwater samples from potential AOCs at the facility in August 1998. The Superfund Section issued a report dated June 30, 1999, entitled "Integrated Preliminary Assessment/Site Inspection (PA/SI), Cristex Drum Site". The PA/SI was performed to assess the immediate or potential threat posed by the site to human health and the environment and to collect information to determine if the site required further action under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA). Based upon AOCs identified in the PA/SI, Leonhardt Environmental recommended conducting additional activities to determine if site operations had resulted in the release of COCs to the soil and groundwater. Activities conducted at the site prior to enrollment into the REC program are summarized in the Environmental Assessment Report included as Appendix A. The report summarizes previous activities conducted by EERB and the Superfund Section as part of the PA/SI and also describes the methods and the remedial and assessment activities conducted by Mid-Atlantic Associates, P.A. (Mid-Atlantic). The data summarized in this report was used to identify the data gaps described in this RIW. 2.0 SITE LOCATION INFORMATION -[.0306(9)( 1 ll The Cristex site is located on West Industry Drive, approximately one-half mile west of the intersection of Route 15 in Oxford, Granville County, North Carolina (Drawing 1.1 ). The approximate center of the site is located at Latitude 36°17'50"N and Longitude 78°37'00"W. The site occupies approximately 22.4 acres. A building of approximately 150,000 square feet in size is present on-site. Adjacent properties are used almost exclusively for industrial purposes. The closest residence is the Oak Ridge Housing complex located approximately 1,350 feet northeast of the site. This complex houses nearly 200 residents. The northern property boundary of the Cristex site is bounded by railroad tracks. North of the railroad tracks is the JFD Electronics/Channel Master National Priorities List (NPL) site (NCO 122 263 825) (also known as the Channel Master site) . MP?;{\J1~4N!J~ E11ginccri11R & Enl'iron111e111a/ Solutions • • Phase I Remedial Investigation Workplan Cristex Facility Oxford, North Carolina October 11, 2002 Page 3 3.0 CURRENT AND HISTORICAL SITE OPERATIONS -[.0306(g)(2)1 The 150,000 square foot building on-site is currently vacant, but was most recently used as a warehouse for CVS Pharmacies (CVS). CVS used this building to store prepackaged products to be sold in their stores. The products were stored on wood pallets and included food items, paper products, cleaning supplies, medicines, etc. Bulk quantities of hazardous materials (such as drums) were not observed by Mid-Atlantic personnel during a walk over of the site in 2000. Prior to CVS occupying the site, the site was used by Cristex as a warp knit fabric mill. Nylon acetate knits were also produced at the facility. Dyes, dyeing assistants, cellulosic and synthetic yarns were used in the manufacturing process. Metals such as zinc, copper, and chromium were commonly used in the dyeing processes. In an Industrial Sewer Connection Application completed in 1 984, the facility listed over 90 products used at the facility. These included dyes, dye carriers, varsol solvents, boiler chemicals, acids, caustic soda, and fuel additives. This documentation was included in the PA/SI report (Section 2.3, Reference 17) and attached as part of Appendix A of this RIW. There are no records of any hazardous waste permits or Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) generator numbers issued to previous operators of the site. A complete description of the facility's historical waste management practices, identified storage vessels, previous releases, disposal practices, and chemical products used in the facility are included in the PA/SI (Appendix A). This description is provided in Sections 2.3 (Operational and Regulatory History) and includes backup documents attached as References 12 through 18. Several releases reportedly occurred at the site and included the following: • Number 6 fuel oil released to the lagoon in March 1983 (14,000 gallons), 1986, and July 2001. • A release of as much as 1,200,000 gallons of heated wastewater to surface water in February 1982. • Based on soil staining evidence, a release of COCs to surface soils at the AST area and the oil/water separator. • Disposal of drums containing waste materials at the former drum disposal area. Some of these waste materials were released into the environment. The drums were reportedly disposed of prior to 1986 . MP?;¾J};t}NTJ~ Engineering & Enl'ironmental Solutions • 0 Phase I Remedial Investigation Workplan Cristex Facility Oxford, North Carolina October 11, 2002 Page 4 Several storage vessels were maintained on the site and included the 20,000 and 30,000 gallon ASTs used to store number 6 fuel oil, a 500 to 750 gallon vat associated with the oil/water separator, and the wastewater lagoon. The lagoon was capable of containing approximately 800,000 gallons of stormwater, boiler blowdown, and wastewaters from the various dyeing and finishing operations. In the years 2001 and 2002, wastes generated at the site include investigation derived waste (IDW) and soils excavated as part of remedial activities. These wastes were classified as non-hazardous and were generated from selected AOCs on-site. The wastes were transported off-site under manifest for disposal at approved facilities. Soils impacted with tetrachloroethene (PCE) and classified as hazardous under RCRA (waste code D039), were transported off-site in 2001. Hazardous and non-hazardous waste manifests and additional information regarding the waste types and quantities generated are included in the Environmental Site Assessment attached as Appendix A. 4.0 SITE MAPS -[.0306(g)(3) AND (4)] A USGS topographic map showing a one-mile radius around the site is provided as Drawing 1 .1. A map showing the AOCs is provided as Drawing 1 .2. Survey plats of the site prepared by registered surveyors are included as Appendix 8. A plat of the entire site is included and based upon conditions of the site in 2000. Additional groundwater monitoring wells were installed since this plat was prepared. The plat was updated on October 3, 2002, to include monitoring wells MW-3I, MW-6I, and wells. MW-6 through MW-9. Access to the interior of the warehouse was not available to survey the precise elevation and location of groundwater monitoring well MW-10. Mr. John Powers of the Superfund Section stated that the location of ·this well could be surveyed following subsequent assessment activities The approximate location of the drum burial area was included on the plat based upon the recollection of the approximate limits of the area, provided by Jeannette Stanley of the Superfund Section. Mid-Atlantic was unable to locate actual surveyed coordinates for the excavation area. 5.0 LOCAL GEOLOGIC AND HYDROGEOLOGIC CONDITIONS -[.0306(g)(5)] The Cristex site is located in the northern portion of the Piedmont Physiographic Province. The bedrock consists of Late Proterozoic to Later Cambrian megacrystic, well-foliated metamorphic granitic rocks of the Raleigh Belt. MP?;~JH~NTJ<; £11Mi11reri11M & £11dro111111•111al So/11tion.1· Phase I Remedial Investigation Workplan Cristex Facility Oxford, North Carolina October 11, 2002 Page 5 The hydrogeologic system consists of unconsolidated saprolitic overburden that ranges in thickness from 5 to 40 feet. Underlying the saprolite is a zone of fractured bedrock approximately 25 feet thick. Underlying the fractured bedrock is relatively unfractured or sparsely fractured crystalline bedrock. The upper two units are reportedly interconnected and act as one unit. According to data supplied in the PA/SI, depth to groundwater ranges from less than one foot BLS near the lagoon to nearly 18 feet BLS near the aboveground storage tanks (ASTs). Groundwater on-site flows toward the northeast and southwest within the shallow aquifer (Drawing 5.1) at a gradient ranging from 0.0007 to 0.016 foot per foot. Overall, groundwater flows toward the east, off the site. Wetlands are present at the northeastern corner of the site. Water table elevations adjacent to this area have been measured at approximately 17 feet BLS (MW-1 in June 2001). This would indicate that the stream located on the property is currently recharging groundwater. 6.0 IDENTIFICATION OF WELLS, SPRINGS, AND SURFACE WATER INTAKES -[.0306(g)(6)] 8 The city of Oxford obtains water from Kerr Lake and maintains a water supply system that serves most of the businesses and residences within a one-half mile radius of the site. Those not served by city water obtain their water from private wells. Mid-Atlantic obtained records from the city of Oxford detailing the addresses of those currently obtaining water from the city water supply. These records are included in Appendix C. • A receptor survey, conducted by the Superfund Section, identified one drinking water well within a half-mile radius of the site. On October 3, 2002, Mid-Atlantic interviewed residents to confirm that households within a half-mile radius were not using private wells. Eight water-supply wells were identified which serve individual residences. One additional water-supply well was identified that serves a shopping center consisting of several businesses. These wells are located along Lewis Street (Highway 1 5). A listing of the location of each of the water-supply wells and a· map showing their location is included in Appendix C. Based upon interviews with local residents and city of Oxford personnel, city water is not available along Lewis Street, south of the intersection West Industry Drive. No springs or surface water intakes used for potable water supply were identified within a one-half mile radius of the site . MP?;~J'l;t}NTJ~ £1Jgineering & Enl'iro11mrn1a/ So/111io11s Phase I Remedial Investigation Workplan Cristex Facility • Oxford, North Carolina October 11, 2002 Page 6 • • 7 .0 IDENTIFICATION OF ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE AREAS -[.0306{g){7)] The site and all adjacent property were evaluated for the presence of environmentally sensitive areas listed in Appendix B of the REC Guidance Document. Telephone conversation logs documenting this investigation are included as Appendix D. The Terrestrial Ecological Evaluation Checklist is also included in Appendix D. Mid-Atlantic conducted a search of the Superfund Section files regarding the adjacent Channel Master Site. The Army Corp of Engineers surveyed the property downstream of the lagoon along the unnamed tributary of Fishing Creek and determined that this area is officially classified as a wetland. This determination was issued on July 17, 2000, and was included in the Channel Master file. As shown on Drawing 1.2, the wetland is located at the northeastern corner of the property Ms. Danielle Pender of the North Carolina Wildlife Conservation Program reported that there are no endangered aquatic or terrestrial species in the immediate vicinity of the site. There are records of species in the Tar River, downstream of the site. She advised that efforts be taken to reduce runoff from any on-site activities. Based upon Mid-Atlantic's conversations with the contacts specified in Appendix B of the REC Guidance Document, no other environmentally sensitive areas were identified on or adjacent to the site. 8.0 CURRENT AND HISTORICAL SITE OWNERSHIP -[.0306{g){8) AND (9)] Steinfield Mills was established in 1944 and purchased two tracts of land on August 31, 1965: • An 11 .13 acre tract from John H. Nelms and wife Mary Ruth C. Nelms • An 11.28 acre tract from Cinco Investors, Inc., George E. Daniel, J.K. Bryan, Jr., Louis R. Hutchinson, John E. Pittard, Jr., and J.K. Nelms. These two parcels make up the Cristex property. Steinfield Mill, Inc. changed its name to IMI Knits, Inc, in 1971, through an article of amendment. !Ml Knits, Inc. changed its name to Cristex, Inc. in 1975, through an article of amendment. Cristex is the present owner. A copy of the current deed dating to 1965 is included in Appendix E. Prior to development in 1965 by Steinfield Mills, the property consisted of wooded farmland . MP?;~Jl~◊NT}~ E1i}/i111'eri11g ,1< E111'iro11mr11111/ So/111io11.1· Phase I Remedial Investigation Workplan Cristex Facility Oxford, North Carolina 9.0 OPERATIONAL HISTORY -[.0306(g)( 10)) October 11, 2002 Page 7 The site was purchased in 1 965. Prior to 1965, the site consisted of wooded farmland. From 1968 to 1986 the facility was primarily used to produce warp knitting textiles. Nylon acetate knits were also produced at the facility. Dyes, dyeing assistants, cellulosic and synthetic yarns were used in the manufacturing process. Chlorinated solvents may have been used to clean the equipment or possibly as part of a dry cleaning operation. Based upon statements made by Mr. Christensen (owner of Cristex) and reported by Mr. Leonhardt of Leonhardt Environmental (environmental consultant to Cristex), chlorinated solvents such as tetrachloroethene were not used in the manufacturing process. Mid-Atlantic authorized Environmental Data Resources, Inc. to conduct a search for Sanborne maps of the site and vicinity. No Sanborne maps were available. Six aerial photographs were available at the North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) Photogrammetric Unit. These photographs were originally examined by Mr. Kirk Pollard (now of Mid-Atlantic) in 1991 as part of a Phase I Site Assessment of the site (included as part of Appendix A). Mid-Atlantic personnel revisited the NCDOT in October 2002 to determine if additional data were available. Aerial photos that show the Cristex site include the following: Mission Exposure Date M-123 734 3-20-1961 M-969 4 11-15-68 M-1626 16 9-23,24-81 M-1656 1 5 3-12-82 M-1697 98 2-4-83 M-2774 438 9-30-91 March 20, 1961 -The Cristex property consists of wooded farmland and no lagoon or surface impoundment is present. November 15, 1968 -The Cristex and adjacent Channel Master site are shown including buildings and the lagoon now on-site. East of the site is wooded land and other industrial businesses are present to the south and east. Additional detail could not be discerned. September 23 and 24, 1981 and March 12, 1982-The photo shows the ASTs on the Cristex site and the drum storage pad. A barren area east of the lagoon can also be seen. This barren area was subsequently investigated as part of the PA/SI. MP?:~J'l;t~.fiTJS: Eni.:inerring ,{ Enl'ironmental Solutio11s • Phase I Remedial Investigation Workplan Cristex Facility Oxford, North Carolina October 11, 2002 Page 8 February 4, 1983 -The lagoon appears half dark and light. As part of the PA/SI, the Superfund Section indicated that based on historical data, a spill of #6 fuel oil had occurred into the lagoon near this time. The difference in shading observed in the aerial photo could be due to shadows on the lagoon or could indicate petroleum product present on the water. September 30, 1991 -There was no observed change in the condition of the site. Copies of several of these aerial photos are included in the PA/SI developed by the Superfund Section, and included as part of the Mid-Atlantic Environmental Assessment Report (Appendix A). 10.0 HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES USED AT SITE -[.0306(g)(11 )] The site is currently not occupied and no hazardous substances are currently used at the site. CVS reportedly did not use hazardous substances in their process. During an inspection of the site in 1991 conducted by Kirk Pollard, now of Mid-Atlantic, Mr. Pollard observed several drums in the boiler room and numerous drums at the drum burial area. The drums in the boiler room reportedly contained materials to service the boilers. Prior to 1986, the site was as a warp knit fabric mill. Nylon acetate knits were also produced at the facility. Dyes, dyeing assistants, cellulosic and synthetic yarns were used in the manufacturing process. Metals such as zinc, copper, and chromium were commonly used in the dyeing processes. In an Industrial Sewer Connection Application completed in 1 984, the facility listed over 90 products used at the facility. These included dyes, dye carriers, varsol solvents, boiler chemicals, acids, caustic soda, and fuel additives. This documentation was included in the PA/SI report (Section 2.3, Reference 17) and attached as part of Appendix A of this RIW. This application provides a comprehensive list of substances used at the site. In addition to the facility permits and documentation included in Appendix A (as part of the PA/SI), contents of the waste material disposed of in the former drum burial area was characterized by ERRS during the removal action. This data also provides information regarding the waste streams produced while the textile facility was in operation. 11.0 ENVIRONMENTAL PERMIT HISTORY -[.0306(g){ 12)] The 150,000 square foot building on-site is currently vacant. This building was previously used as a warehouse for CVS Pharmacies. According to Leonhardt Environmental, the firm overseeing environmental issues for the Cristex Corporation, there are currently no permits in effect for the site. MP?;~Jl~◊NT}<,; E1111i111•eri11i: & Enl'ironm1•111al So/111io11.1 • Phase I Remedial Investigation Workplan Cristex Facilitv Oxford, North Carolina October 11, 2002 Page 9 During operation of the textile plant, the site reportedly maintained an air quality permit (Permit No. 2097R4) for emissions from the boilers. A summary of air permit issues, as well as information included in the NCDENR, Air Quality Section file are included in Appendix A (Reference 18 of the PA/SI report). Process wastewater was discharged to the City of Oxford under a Permit (No. 0106). The permit stipulated discharge limits for chromium, copper, lead, phenols, zinc, biological oxygen demand, chemical oxygen demand, pH, and total suspended solids. Correspondence by the City of Oxford, other interested parties, and a copy of the permit are included in Appendix A (Reference 17 of the PA/SI report). 12.0 PREVIOUS ENVIRONMENTAL INVESTIGATIONS -[.0306(g)(13)] Copies of previous environmental investigations performed at the site are included in Appendix A. 13.0 PROCEDURES FOR SITE CHARACTERIZATION -[.0306(9)(14) AND (15)] 13.1 General As part of the PA/SI, the Superfund Section identified AOCs that exhibited a reasonable probability of being contaminated with hazardous substances and required further investigation. Based upon data collected by the Superfund Section and Mid-Atlantic, five AOCs were identified. These include the following: • • • • • AOC-1 AOC-2 AOC-3 AOC-4 AOC-5 Former Drum Burial Area Former Oil/Water Separator and Drainage Ditch Aboveground Storage Tanks Lagoon Groundwater Additional investigation is being proposed at four of these AO Cs as part of this RIW. These include AOC-1, AOC-2, AOC-4, and AOC-5. Mid-Atlantic has included possible source areas to groundwater in AOC-5 (Groundwater). This includes a possible source area within the building. The justification for this possible source was discussed in Section 9.6 of the Environmental Assessment Report included as Appendix A. These areas were not originally identified in the PA/SI prepared by the Superfund Section . MP?;~\fl~4NTJ~ Eni:inct'rinR & E111•irr,nme111al 80/utions Phase I Remedial Investigation Workplan Cristex Facility Oxford, North Carolina October 11, 2002 Page 10 The proposed scope of work is outlined by AOC in the sections below. These sections do not contain specific details regarding the sampling methods, decontamination procedures, etc. These items are addressed in the Sampling and Analysis Plan prepared for the site and included as Appendix F. The data gaps for each AOC are described below. Specific details regarding assessment results, concentrations present of COCs, etc are included in the Environmental Assessment Report included as Appendix A. 13.2 AOC-1 Former Drum Burial Area 13.2.1 Confirmation of Remedial Activities ERRB removed 26 buried drums and 137 empty drums that were present at the surface. During the removal action, impacted soils were also removed. Five confirmation soil samples were collected by the ERRS. The Superfund Section subsequently collected one additional soil sample. Mid-Atlantic reviewed the confirmation sampling results obtained by EPA and Superfund Section and summarized in the PA/SI. These results were compared to the REC soil RGs. Based upon these sampling results, soils impacted with COCs at concentrations at or exceeding soil Remediation Goals (RGs) were removed. There reportedly were six excavation pits located within the area shown on Drawing 1 .2, labeled as the former drum burial area. Precise data regarding the locations of these pits are not available. The edges of the former excavation area were subsequently identified and staked by Su perfund Section personnel. Additional soil samples, as described below, will be collected as part of the RI to confirm· that the AOC has been fully delineated and that the remedial activities-have been completed at this AOC. Six soil samples were collected. by the ERRB and Superfund Section, however, since the precise locations of these samples is not known, additional samples will be collected to confirm the results. 13.2.2 GeoProbe Borings A groundwater monitoring well (MW-6D) will be installed at the former drum burial area to delineate the vertical extent of groundwater impact (Drawing 13. 1). This well is further described in section 13.6.3, below. During the advancement of this boring, a soil sample will be collected at the base of the previous excavation. The excavation base will be identified as the contact between fill material and native soils. If this interface cannot be discerned, the soil sample will be collected at a depth of approximately 10 feet below land surface (BLS). MP?;{\f,¾◊N!JS: En~inecrini: & E111'iro11mrn1a! So/111io111 • • Phase I Remedial Investigation Workplan Cristex Facility Oxford, North Carolina October 11, 2002 Page 11 Four GeoProbe borings will be advanced at the perimeter of the former drum burial area (Drawing 13.1). The borings will be advanced to a depth of approximately ten feet BLS. Soils will be logged for lithology and screened using a total vapor analyzer (TVA) for the presence of volatile organic compounds (VOCs). If VOCs are detected in the soils at concentrations exceeding background levels, the two soil samples exhibiting the highest TVA reading will be analyzed. If VOCs are not detected using the TVA, soil samples will be collected at depths of approximately five feet and ten feet BLS to confirm that the extent of the impact was assessed and remediated by the ERRB during their remedial activities. A total of nine discrete soil samples will be collected from this AOC to determine if this AOC can be closed. Soil samples collected from the former drum burial area will be analyzed for the presence of VOCs according to EPA Method 8260B plus tentatively identified compounds (Tl Cs), semi-volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) according to EPA Method 8270D plus TICs, polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) according to EPA Method 8082, pesticides according to EPA Method 8081 B, and hazardous substance metals according to appropriate EPA Methods. 13.3 AOC-2 Former Oil/Water Separator and Drainage Ditch 13.3.1 Identified Data Gaps At the eastern side of the building, an oil/water separator and drum storage area were present. The oil/water separator had a capacity of approximately 500 to 750 gallons and was removed in 1 998. No secondary containment was present around either the separator or drum storage area and these areas were uncovered. Staining of the surface soils and wall adjacent to the past location of the unit was visible. Storm water run-off from this area flows to an adjacent ditch directed toward the former location of the ASTs. For a detailed description of sampling results in this AOC, please refer to Section 6.0 of the attached report (Appendix A). Assessment activities in this AOC were conducted by the Superfund Section during their PA/SI and concentrated on collecting surface samples for source area identification. Target compounds such as PCE, trichloroethene (TCE), cis-1,2-dichloroethene (cis-1 ,2-DCE), methyl ethyl ketone (MEK), PCB-1254, nickel, arsenic, copper, and zinc were detected as part of this effort. Of the SVOCs, only bis (2-ethylhexyl) phthalate was detected. This compound was detected in one sample on one occasion . MP?;~Jr~4N!J~ Engin('f.'ring & Enl'ironme111u/ S0l111io11s • Phase I Remedial Investigation Workplan Cristex Facility Oxford, North Carolina October 11, 2002 Page 12 Impacted soils within the northern portion of the ditch area were excavated and disposed of in accordance with local, state, and federal requirements. Confirmation soil samples collected from the base of the excavation at the northern ditch area (shown as Excavations 1 and 2 on Drawing 13.2), did not exhibit COCs at concentrations at or above the soil RGs. However, these samples were analyzed for RCRA metals instead of hazardous substance list metals. The vertical and lateral extent of impact to soil along the southern end of the ditch (south of MW-3 and including Excavation 3) has not been delineated. In addition, further delineation is required beneath the drum storage pad, and at the former location of the oil/water separator. The focus of the assessment activities will be to determine the impact from the oil/water separator, the vertical extent of the soil impact within the southern ditch, and to determine if impact in the ditch area extends beneath the drum pad. 13.3.2 GeoProbe Borings Nine GeoProbe borings will be advanced through the drum pad area, along the ditch, and near the oil/water separator to the water table, or until probe refusal. Two soil samples will be collected from each boring. One sample will be collected at two feet BLS and the additional sample will be collected at a depth dependent upon field screening results. The soils will be logged and samples collected for headspace analysis using a TVA (or equivalent). The samples exhibiting the highest 'TVA reading in the boring will be analyzed for the presence of VOCs according to EPA Method 8260B. The additional COCs present in this AOC, including SVOCs, PCBs, and metals are less mobile than the chlorinated solvents such as PCE. The SVOCs, PCBs and metals are expected to be limited to the upper one to two feet of the soil column. Therefore, initial sampling activities for these COCs will be limited to the upper two feet of the soil column. A soil sample will be collected from each GeoProbe boring at a depth of two feet BLS. These samples will be analyzed for the presence of SVOCs according to EPA Method 8270, PCBs according to EPA Method 8082, and hazardous substance metals according to appropriate EPA Methods. Additional assessment activities can be done during Phase II RI activities, to delineate vertical and lateral extent of the COCs, if required. Additional confirmation soil sampling is required in the northern ditch area, at the previous location of Excavations 1 and 2 (Drawing 13.2). Two composite surface soil samples will be collected using a hand trowel. Each sample will be composited from six locations and analyzed for the presence of hazardous substance metals according to appropriate EPA Methods . MP?;{\fl;t~.fiTJS: £11ginreri11g & Enl'ironmenta/ Svlutio11s • Phase I Remedial Investigation Workplan Cristex Facility Oxford, North Carolina 13.4 AOC-3 Aboveground Storage Tanks October 11, 2002 Page 13 Two vertical ASTs were located at the northeast side of the building (Drawing 1.2). The ASTs had a total capacity of approximately 50,000 gallons and were previously used for the storage of #6 fuel oil for use in the on-site boilers. The ASTs were dismantled and the tank material and the impacted soil removed. For a detailed description of site assessment results in this AOC, please refer to Section 6.0 of the attached report (Appendix Al. Confirmation soil sampling was conducted following the disassembly of the ASTs and excavation of impacted soils beneath the ASTs and adjacent to the boiler room area. Results of these remedial activities are described in Section 6.0 of the attached report (Appendix A). Results of confirmation sampling done by Mid-Atlantic indicated that no soils exhibiting COCs at concentrations at or above the soil RGs remain in the immediate vicinity of the ASTs. Therefore, additional data is not required at this time. However, as described in Section 13.6, the source of COCs in groundwater has not been determined and additional assessment activities will be conducted within the building. This will include investigations next to the boiler room area. Since fuel'. for the boilers was supplied by the ASTs, they could be included within this AOC if they are found to be a source to VOCs in groundwater. 13.5 AOC-4 Lagoon 13.5 .1 Identified Data Gaps Near the northeastern corner of the property, a one-half acre, reportedly unlined lagoon is present. The lagoon was reportedly used from 1 966 to 1 986 to store stormwater, boiler blow down, and wastewater from the dyeing and finishing processes. The lagoon had the capacity to hold approximately 800,000 gallons. The dam of the lagoon was breached in 1998 to prevent the accumulation of rainwater. Runoff from the lagoon discharges at the north end of the pond to a small tributary and wetland. For a detailed description of site assessment results in this AOC, please refer to Section 8.0 of the attached report (Appendix A). The water within the lagoon was disposed of in accordance with local, state, and federal requirements. The sludge material remaining in the lagoon has been sampled and exhibited concentrations of COCs at concentrations exceeding soil RGs established under the REC program. The COCs present include antimony, PCB-1254, and petroleum-fuel-related compounds such as chlorobenzene, xylenes, and methylbenzene. Delineation of the vertical extent of impact in the soil is required. Groundwater at this location also exhibited elevated concentrations of nickel. In addition, additional data are required to determine if the banks of the lagoon have been impacted during high water periods in the lagoon. MP?;¾J7~◊N!Js; En,:in1•1'ring & Enl'iro11men1al Soilltions • Phase I Remedial Investigation Workplan Cristex Facility Oxford, North Carolina 13.5.2 Proposed Soil Sampling October 11, 2002 Page 14 The vertical extent of impact beneath the sludge will be assessed using a hand auger. The lagoon is approximately 220 feet long and 100 feet side. A 50-foot grid will be established across the lagoon. Three composite sludge samples and six composite samples from soil immediately beneath the sludge (at a depth of approximately two feet BLS) will be submitted for analysis. Grid node samples may be composited, if needed, to provide the proper number of samples for analysis Samples analyzed for VOCs must be collected at least six to 18 inches BLS. A minimum of 25% of the VOC samples must be discrete samples An additional six composite samples will be analyzed from the surface soils along the banks of the lagoon area. The samples will be collected using a hand auger or hand trowel. A fifty-foot grid will be established along the banks samples will be collected at the grid nodes for analysis or compositing. The same procedure will be followed as described above. The discrete soil samples to be analyzed for VOCs will be selected based upon field screening methods. The samples the grid nodes with the highest reading using a TVA (or equivalent) will be analyzed for VOCs according to EPA Method 8260B. Each composite sample from the lagoon and banks will be analyzed for the presence of SVOCs according to EPA Method 8270, PCBs according to EPA Method 8082, and antimony and nickel according to appropriate EPA Methods. 13.6 AOC-5 Groundwater 13.6.1 Identified Data Gaps PCE and its degradation products (TCE, cis-1,2-DCE, and vinyl chloride) have been identified in groundwater. In addition, petroleum-fuel-related compounds (chlorobenzene, 1, 2-dichlorobenzene, and volatile petroleum hydrocarbons) have been exhibited in samples collected from wells MW-2 and MW-10, located near the boiler room and the ASTs. Nickel has been exhibited in the sample collected from well MW- 1 (lagoon area) at a concentration above its North Carolina Groundwater Quality Standard. For a detailed description of site assessment results in this AOC, please refer to Section 9.0 of the attached report (Appendix A). Three possible source areas for COCs in groundwater were identified during previous assessment activities (Appendix A). The first source may be the ditch area (AOC-2). Elevated concentrations of PCE were detected in the soils near the southern end of the drum pad (Excavation 3, Drawing 13.2). Nickel exhibited in the groundwater sample collected from MW-1 (lagoon) may represent a second source area at the MP?;{\Jl~◊N!J~ £11ginrering & E11\'ironmen1al So/111iu11s • • Phase I Remedial Investigation Workplan Cristex Facility Oxford, North Carolina October 11, 2002 Page 15 lagoon area. In addition, a third source area appears to be present on the northeastern side of the building. Groundwater on the north and eastern side of the building, including samples from wells MW-9, MW-2, MW-10, and MW-3, exhibit elevated concentrations of PCE and its degradation products (Drawing 13.3). Based upon groundwater quality data collected thus far and groundwater flow directions at the site (Drawing 5. 1), the source of eoes in groundwater beneath the building appears to be located on the northeastern side of the building. In addition to identifying the source of eoes in groundwater, delineation of the lateral extent of eoes in groundwater is needed to the south and vertical definition is needed to determine how deep eoes extend in the aquifer. 13.6.2 Source Identification A soil gas survey will be conducted in the vicinity of the northeastern portion of the building. The proposed investigation area is shown on Drawing 13.1. The northeastern portion was chosen for investigation because groundwater collected from MW-8, along the southeastern side of the building did not exhibit eocs at concentrations exceeding their respective laboratory practical quantitation limits (PQLs) while samples collected on the northeastern side of the building (MW-2, MW- 3, MW-9, and MW-10) exhibited the eoes. Based upon the presence of the groundwater ridge present beneath the building, the source of eoes in groundwater is likely present on the northeastern side of the building. A soil gas survey will be conducted using EMFLUX charcoal collector cartridges. The primary purpose of the survey is to qualitatively identify possible areas in the vadose zone that may contain voes, and that require additional investigation. Up to 15 charcoal collector cartridges will be placed beneath the concrete floor of the facility and left in place for several days to absorb off-gases from compounds that may exist in the subsurface. The sampling devices will be placed into one-inch diameter holes· drilled through the floor. During previous site inspections conducted by Mid-Atlantic, the building was being used as a warehouse and observations regarding the locations of utilities, floor drains, etc., could not be made. Since the site is no longer occupied, the building can be carefully inspected for these features in an effort to help direct the placement of the soil gas samplers. The precise location of each sampler will be dependent upon the results of the site inspection. The samplers will be analyzed for the presence of chlorinated solvents according to EPA Method 8021 . If areas are identified that exhibit elevated concentrations of voes, soil samples will be collected using a hand auger or GeoProbe and analyzed for the presence of voes using EPA Method 8260B to determine the quantitative concentrations of the eoes present . MP?;~Jl~~N!}~ Engineering & Enl'ironmi•nta/ Solutions • 0 • Phase I Remedial Investigation Workplan Cristex Facility Oxford, North Carolina 13.6.3 Monitoring Well Installation October 11, 2002 Page 16 Two additional groundwater-monitoring wells will be installed and sampled. One shallow Type II monitoring well (MW-11 as shown on Drawing 13.1) will be installed adjacent to the eastern property line. This well will be constructed of two-inch Schedule 40 PVC casing and screened across the water table. It is anticipated that the well will be drilled to approximately 30 feet BLS and completed with 1 5 feet of 0.010-inch mechanically slotted well screen placed in the bottom of the well. A Type Ill groundwater monitoring well (MW-6D, as shown on Drawing 13.1) will be installed to determine the vertical extent of groundwater impact downgradient of the building and the oil/water separator and ditch. The well will be drilled using hollow stem auger and air hammer-drilling techniques to the competent bedrock material. A six-inch steel isolation casing will initially be installed at a depth of between 75 to 80 feet BLS. The well will be completed with an inner casing of two-inch diameter Schedule 40 PVC casing with five feet of 0.010-inch, mechanically slotted well screen placed in the bottom. The total depth of the well will be dependent upon the estimated location of fractures sufficient to yield groundwater but is estimated to be approximately 85 feet BLS. Following installation and development of wells MW-11 and MW-6D, these wells will be sampled. Samples will be analyzed for the presence of priority pollutant metals according to appropriate EPA Methods and VOCs according to EPA Method 8260B. In addition, prior to sampling activities, water levels will be measured in all wells on- site. These data will be used to develop a groundwater contour map for the shallow aquifer. 13. 7 Surface Water Pathways An isolated wetland is present at the northeast corner of the property, downstream of the lagoon discharge (Drawing 1.2). The wetland is approximately 562 feet long and is drained by an unnamed tributary to Fishing Creek. The unnamed tributary receives runoff from the Cristex site, adjacent properties located north of the site, and drainage from the lagoon. Since the wetland lies downstream of the point of discharge for the lagoon, assessment of possible impact to the wetland was investigated by the Superfund Section with sampling conducted in 2001. As summarized in Mid-Atlantic's report included as Appendix A, results of the Superfund Section investigation will be reviewed prior to conducting additional assessment activities in this portion of the site. The report by the Superfund Section will reportedly be issued in December 2002 . MP?s-~tr~,}NTJ~ t:11i:i11ccri11!/ & f:"11l'iron111c111<1/ Solutions • • Phase I Remedial Investigation Workplan Cristex Facility Oxford, North Carolina 14.0 QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN -[.0306(9)(16)] October 11, 2002 Page 17 Field and laboratory procedures for quality assurance/quality control (QA/QC) are described in the Quality Assurance Project Plan (QAPP) included as part of the Sampling and Analysis Plan (Appendix F). 15.0 ANALYTICAL METHODS AND PARAMETERS -[.0306(G)(17)] Site assessment activities conducted by the Superfund Section and Mid-Atlantic Associates conform to Phase I sampling requirements established in the REC Guidance Document. To identify possible source areas, samples were initially analyzed for the presence of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) according to EPA Method 8260B, SVOCs according to EPA Method 8270, hazardous substance metals according to EPA SW846 Methods, and polychlorinated biphenyls according to EPA Method 8082. Sampling outlined as part of these Workplan activities will be analyzed for the COCs identified for each AOC, unless otherwise indicated. Analytical methods are described in the QAPP included as Appendix F. 16.0 EQUIPMENT AND PERSONNEL DECONTAMINATION PROCEDURES - [.0306(G)( 18)) Procedures for decontamination of personnel and equipment are included 1n the Sampling and Analysis Plan included as Appendix F. 17 .0 HEAL TH AND SAFETY PLAN -[.0306(G)( 19)] A site specific Health and Safety Plan is included in Appendix G . MP?;{\fl~◊N~~9. Engineerin,i.: & £111•iro11me11tr1! So/111io11., • DRAWINGS MP?;t\:E~◊N!J<;. Eni:incerini: & E111'ironme111al So/111io11s NORTH Q MID-ATLANTIC ASSOCIATES, P.A. REFERENCE: OXFORD, NORTH CAROLINA SE/4 OXFORD 15' QUADRANGLE N3615-W7830/7.5 OMA 5256 I SE-SERIES VB42 1981 PHOTOREVISED 1984 CONTOUR INTERVAL 10 FEET TOPOGRAPHIC SITE MAP CRISTEX FACILl1Y SITE OXFORD, NORTH CAROLINA DRAWN BY: DRAFT :)'..lZ CHECK:"-(.., APPROV NORTH CAROLINA ~ QUADRANGLE LOCATION 0 2000' SCALE: ,._ 2000· DATE: DECEMBER 1999 JOB 7098R0705.00 NO: CAO 01-070501 NO: DWG: '.1 .1 LEGEND 0MW-1 41-MW-JI QlCMMW-1 MONITORING WEIL LOCATION INTERMEDIATE. MONITORING WEIL LOCATION MONITORING WEIL LOCATION-CHANNEL MASTER INVESTIGATION PROPERTY BOUNOARY -,--1-x-FENCE - · · -• • -• • -TRIBUTARY TO FlSHING CREEK CONCRETE M ID-ATLANTIC ASSOClA.TES, P.A. Engineering &-Environmental Solutions REFERENCE: BEN L. BRYAN, P.A. SURVEY MAP-DATED 9/16/98. ....--:' ~----I ....----__;:...----I ----::. --I ,..... . .:,_· --\ WETIAND / --j ._.. '--· . --· · -:;;,; -· · -..l •• -APPROXIMATE EXTENT --~ ----- FORMER LOCATION OF OIL/WATER SEPARATOR I ~ -0 t---'- ; -J -JI WOODED ABOVEGROUND STORAGE TANKS CMMW-20 / I I TREE LINE DRUM EXCAVATION LOCATION (FORMER DRUM BURIAL ARFA) ----..-!++-+--DRAINAGE □ITCH CRlsrEX FACILITY \ 1/ I 1/ I GRAVEL I fl / LOT ANO I DRIVE/ 1~ -. I 1_,_.il "·-·-·-£./ -•-p ,1;1 I I ~t 11 q/ I\ / f/ I / / I SITE MAP CRISTEX FACIL11Y SITE FISHING CREEK TOWNSHIP GRANVILLE COUN1Y, NORTH CAROLINA OF WETLAND N'.FA ENLARGEMENT OF AREA OF CONCERN 0MW-10 DRAWN BY: 0 SCALE: ~-~ 100' ~~'11NG CHECK .;.;l{v ENGINEER CHECK N n , BY: .-1-1// APPROVED BY: I 100· a I I I 180' SCALE: ,._ 180' DATE: OCTOBER 2002 JOB NO: 098R0705.08 CAD # 01-0705D5-08 DWG NO:. 1.2 0 OlJTFALL ENLARGEMENT OF LAGOON AREA es-1 8-5 OS-4 SCALE: 1 ·-80' INL£T es-s S-6 • 0 8-2 w- 0 LEGEND 0MW-1 6MW-31 0CMMW-1 e 8-1 es-1 AGP-14 ~ MW-11 m MW-6D -•-•-•- MONITORING WELL LOCATION INTERMEDIATE MONITORING WELL LOCATION MONITORING WELL LOCATION-CHANNEi. MASTER INVcSTlGATI0N COMPOSITE SOIL SAMPLE LOCATION APPROXIMATE SWDGE ANO SOIL SAMPLE LOCATION PROPOSED GEOPROBE BORING LOCATION PROPOSED SHALLOW MONITORING WEI.L LOCATION PROPOSED DEEP MONITORING WEJ..L LOCATION PROPERlY BOUNDARY FENCE TRIBUTARY TO FISHING CREEK CONCRErE M ID-ATLANTIC ASSOCIATES, P.A. Engineering & Environmental Solutions -- _,,.,,.,,.,-;' __.,.---_-I _.-__;..-----I ----I ----~ :::::::------ /~ ;,_ -\ WETlMD I ✓ ----. ..-.. -. -.L_ y/-'-.. -~NlfA. . . -APPROXIMATE EXTENT --,.:__ _ __ OF WEllMD AREA -,---- / WOODED GROUND b RAGE TANKS CMMW-20 I i I I TREE LINE ABOVEGROUND SltlRAGE TANKS (REMO\/Ell) ENLARGEMENT OF AREA OF CONCERN ~~~=-i I r ~ MW-6D -2 -6 t---'- j -3 SEP JOR -31 DRUM EXCAVATION LOCATION (FORMER ORUM BURIAL AREA) PROPOSED ----,.-1+-/'-+-DRAJNAGE DITCH c.-~~--- CRISID< FACILITY STATF.!l240 1195 \ I MW-r PROPOSED SOIL SAMPLING AND MONITORING WELL LOCATION MAP CRISTEX FACIL11Y SITE FISHING CREEK TOWNSHIP GRANVILLE COUN1Y, NORTH CAROLINA --.,; ORUM EXCAVATION LOCATION ..._ -...., (FORMER ORUM BURIAL AREA) GP-I0-----r,-+r....,..,'6 DRUW SltlRAGE PAJl DRAWN BY: 0 DR.AfllNG CHECK BY: ENGINEER CHECK BY: APFROVED BY: -...., GP-18~-60 ...... 1 .--.... MW-61\:. ':..-I 5 6 < ' ,.....,.--''rt-ill ) c,-, 11/ . MW-3 rJ6MW-3J AGP-8 DRAINAGE DITCH I I I -7 0 SCALE: 1 •-1 BO' 180' DATE: OCTOBER 2002 JOB NO: 098R0705.08 CAD # 01-070509-08 DWG NO: 4.1 REFERENCE: BEN L. BRYAN, P.A. SURVEY MAP-DATED 9/16/98. • 0MW-1 01W-1 .61.MW-JI -Ef,GP-1 0CMMW-1 MONITORING WEU. LOCATION TEMPORARY MONITORING WELL LOCATION INTERMEDIATE MONITORING WB..L LOCA.l10N GEOPROBE.LOCATION MONITORING WELL LOCA.110N-CHANNEL MA.STER INVESTIGATION PROPERTY BOUNllARY -•-•--•-FENCE - • • - • · - · • - TRIBUTARY TO FlSHING CREEK M ID-ATLANTIC A.s-s·o·c lA.T"E s, P.A. Engineering &-Environmental Solutions REFERENCE: BEN L. BRYAN, P.A. SURVEY MAP-DATED 9/16/98. WETl..AND I ·.,._ .. -.. AREA-.. --L. ··- FORMER LOCATION OF OIL/WATER SEPARATOR I WOODED ABOVEGROUND sr0RAGE TANKS -7 CMMW-2O I I ffiEE LINE DRUM EXCAVATION LOCATION (FORMER DRUM BURIAL AREA) \1-----,.../..,/..+----li-- □ RAINAGE □ITCH CRISID FACILITY STAJ'E"R!JAO 11515 EXCAVATION AREAS -2 -J P-+ -5 CRISTEX FACILITY SITE FISHING CREEK TOWNSHIP GRANVILLE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA APPROXIMATE EXTENT OF WmAND AREA EXCAVATION + MW-1O0 EXCAVATION 2 lW-2 0 ENLARGEMENT OF AREA OF CONCERN DRUM EXCAVATION LOCATION FORMER DRUM BURIAL AREA) I I I I I EXCAVATION 1 ti' I 'MW-J 1/J-'ll.MW-JI DRAINAGE DITCH ♦GP-2 ,-El, GP-J I G - 100· MW-61\ A ,,,"', ( \ ~ \ ) MW-6,..,.,., I I I EXCAVATION J SCALE: 1•= 100' DRAWN BY: DRAFTING CHECK BY: ENGINEER CHECK BY: APPROVED BY: ~ o 160' SCALE: ,._ 180' DATE: OCTOBER 2002 JOB NO: 098R0705.08 CAD # 01-070504-08 DWG NO: 4.2 LEGEND lllMW-1 AMW-31 lllTW-3 i!lCMMW-1 -•-•-•- MONITORING WEU. LOCATION INTERMEDIATE MONITORING WB.l. LCCA.l10N TEMPORARY MONITORING WW. LOCATION MONITORING WEU. LDCATION-CH-'NNEL MASTER IN\IESTIGATION PROPERTY BOUNCARY FENCE TRIBUTARY TO FlSHING CREEK CONCRETE - --100 - - -ESTIMATED ISOCONCENTRATION LINE (CASHED WHERE INFERRED) (6,990) BQL TETRACHLOROETHENE CONCENTRATION (ug/L) RESULTS BELOW LABORATORY PRACTICAL QUANllTATION LIMIT M ID-ATLANTIC AS S O C I ATES, P.A. Engineering & Environmental Solutions --------- -~ ~ --I ---~ ---::. - ,--. _ ...... \ I wrn»ID / ·-· ......... -··-~;;-··....t..,, ·) -APPROXIMATE EXTENT --~----- FORMER LOCATION OF OIL/WATER SEPARATOR I tao"'a, r If _3 (6,900) WOOOEO - ABOVEGROUND STORAGE TANKS --1 --- -7 CMMW-_.O ) ---/ -_.. I MW-8 (1,900) ? I I / 1',---..._---,::--.-f-/f-f,<'--:;.--DRAINAGE DITCH CRISTEX FACILJTY I \ DR~D,I _t'// --"" / ·-·-·-k11/ .,,-·-III.'. \I !I.' ,, 3/ I I\ I I \ I I I TETRACHLOROETHENE ISOCONCENTRATION MAP CRISTEX FACILITY SITE FISHING CREEK TOWNSHIP GRANVILLE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA / I TREE LINE OF WEIIANO AREA DRAWN BY: :h~71NG CHECK J:tJ2._ ENGINEER CHECK BY: APPROVED BY: REFERENCE: BEN L. BRYAN, P.A. SURVEY MAP-DATED 9/16/98; LOCATIONS FOR TW-3 AND MW-10 APPROXIMATED. 0 1B0' SCALE: 1·-180' DATE: OCTOBER 2002 JOB NO: 098R0705.08 CAO # 01-070508-08 DWG NO: 4.3 • LEGEND QIMW-1 MONITORING WEl.L LOCATION Ii.MW-JI INTERMEDIATE MONITORING WEl.L LOCATION QICIIMW-20 MONITORING WEl.L LOCATION-CHANNEL MASTER INVE5TlGATION (NM) NOT MEASURED {77.69') WATER TABLE ELEVATION ~ GROUNDWATER FlDW DIRECTION -----B2' ESTIMATED WATER TABLE ELEVATION (DASHED WHERE INFERRED) PROPER1Y BOUNDARY -•-•-•-Ft'.NCE -• · - • • - · • - Tl<IBUTARY TO FISHING CREEi< MW;¾li~~!!.£ Engmeeriilg· &:· Eilvironmenf111 Solutions REFERENCE:. BEN L. BRYAN, P.A. SURVEY MAP-DATED 9/16/98. - CHANNEL MASTffi SITE -----.o ~o 0 \)~~_Q,. r GRAVEL • o· ESTIMATED WATER TABLE CONTOUR MAP (6/6/01) CRISTEX FACILITY SITE GRANVILLE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA WOODED ORUM EXCAVATION LOCATION (FORMER ORUM BURIAL AREA) DRAWN BY: ~~INEER CHECK !:t(2- APPROVED BY: 0 180' SCALE: 1•-180' DATE: OCTOBER 2002 JOB NO: 098R0705.08 CAD # 01-070501-08 DWG NO: 5.1 • APPENDIX A ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT REPORT, CRISTEX FACILITY • OXFORD, NORTH CAROLINA SEE VOLUMES II -IV • MP?s-~lr~4NTJ<; £11gin1•ering & £111•iro11men1a/ Solutians 0 • APPENDIX B SURVEY PLATS MP?;t\fltiNTJ~ £11gi11eering & Enl'irunmen1,,I Solurions • • MONITORING ~l REffRENCE TABI E MONITORING WELL GROUND ELEVAlkJN T.O.C. ELEVATION 1 91.~ N~ 3 99.19 98.95 I, DWA 11,'E R. KROEZE CERTIFY IHA T ALL LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE muE AND ACCURATE: TO IHE BEST OF MY KNOV.U:DGE AND ABILITY. 3i 0013 oo« 6 100.15 102.26 6i 99.27 101.56 8 101.00 100.77 9 100.80 100.52 VICINITY MAP (NlS) /iJllCS;. I. IHIS SURVf:Y IS NOT INTENDED TO REPRESENT A CO/,/PLETE: LOCATION OR BOUNDARY SURVf:Y OF IHE AREA SHOWN. IHIS SURVf:Y IS INTE:NDED TO BE USED IN CONJUNCTION 1117H A PRH10US SURVf:Y PERORMED BY BEN L. BRYAN, P.A. TITl£D "AS-BUil T SURVf:Y FOR CRISTE:X CORP.~ DA TED SEPTEMBER. 6, 199a 2. IHE TOP OF IHE IIUL COVf:RS FOR MW-5 AND MW-6 IIERE USED TO MA Tai IHE ELEVATIONS ON IHE REFERENCED MAP. IHE SOURCE FOR THESE ELEVATIONS APPEARS TO BE ASSUMED. LEGEND MW-GROUND MONITORING IIUL T. 0. C. -TOP OF IIUL CASING @) -GROUND MONITORING IIUL flJ -UTIUTY POL£ CONC. 1117H ~ DWA mE R. KROEZE, P.L.S. L-3911 MW-7 ® MW-61 @) MW-6 ® DATE: I I. IJ? 11;· I /•~ I·~/ I~ MW-J MW-Ji @)@ 1$ I I ,. .¢.:OMPU TED ~ I POINT ;::JI ti [J~I fl ,. . I. ~v/ I\C) !1~ ~/ ((j !I. ~/~ I• /'~ /~?/ TEMPORARY fl1 I,'.} -!,,B~E,~N!;,CH~M~A'.J!R.l..K6----I COTTON SPINDLE IN / UTIUTY POL£ / EL£V=106.22 50' 0' 25' 50' 100' b.-.. -~ P.,,.,.----~~ GRAPIHC SCALE (1'=50') I UM/TED LOCATION SURVEY FOR MID-ATLANTIC ASSOCIATES, P.A. SURVEYING SOLUTIONS, P .C. SITE: CRJSTEX FACILITY OXFORD, NC --•~--6101 /lllISBOROUGH 5T. ASHING CREEK TOWNSHIP GRANVILLE CO. NORTH CAROLINA DA TE: OCT. J, 2002 P.O. BOX 33324 RAUIGH, NC 27838 (IJJIJ}-861-4833 SCALE: 1"=50' JOB NO. 02-027 • I I I I J ~ ~- Cj -~ I'! ~ m ~ z ~ =ti """\ \ Nos· 52· 49" w 9§.45' \ I I I \ \ I ; ~- • 80R/N7; E:L., /02.3' e MW-4 F'H IP JPS z 0 "' • \JI "! 0 o, ::.. EL.• 99.49' ___ l.L_t_....:. , b UTILITY , POLE \ \ · MW-5 5.05 F'H ♦ I I I \ JPS \ \ GRA\ff'L LOT FH D ♦ WM D WM CHAIN LINK FENCE I I • I • I ' I N 87° 26' 00" W -457.80' POND e MW-3 ) EL. • E9.J8' Cl/RYE I RADIUS 77.20' STREAM ---- 22423 ACRES 8Y COORDINATE METHOD WOODS I I r-20 I 1---------- ;· PUBLIC SERVICE CO. OF N.C. D.B. 268 -567 ----- PUBLIC SERVICE CO. OF N.C. D.B. 253 -815 CURVE DATA LENGTH DELTA CH. BRG. CH. DIST. 10.4.46' 77" 31'39" N48"40'/0"W 96.67' SOUTHGATE ASSOCIATES D.B. 249 -683 I, BENJAMIN L. BRYAN CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A SURVEY OF AN EXISTING PARCEL OF LAND AND DOES NOT CREATE A NEW STREET OR CHANGE AN EXISTING STREET ---I Yf, . ·"lr< ,( {?fl. ,, 4:,,e1;-<-. E ·: ,~ 1_. ':'::::k;l :>:: BENJAMIN L. BRYAN,' RLS. L-2679 i ~ .. R-164§_/ o 5.R. 1195 60' R/W § REVISION AUGUST 8, 2000 TO SHOW DISCHARGE AREA WITH ELEVATIONS ~ ----BAR SCALE ---. ---TWO BORING SITES WITH ELEVATIONS, FIVE MONITORING WELLS ~ 100· 75· 50• 25· o so· 100· 200· 300· WITH ELEVATIONS, LOCATION OF' WELL CMMW-20 AND STREAM. '.JI VICINITY MAP N.T.S. REFERENCES: .....eD~.B~.,~65:<..:.~51~3 _______ _ STATE OF -TH CAROLINA _ _,G"'Re,A,.,N"'Vl,-LL,.E.__ ___ coUNTY 1, BENJAMIN L. BRYAN certify -!Na mop waa drOW11 under my 1uporvlllon, from on actual 1urvey, mon under my ..,.........., dud deoc.-lptlon rocordo In llooll __ , P• __ !hot Ille ratio of proclolon oa colcu latocl by lotlludeo and doporhlru II I / 26163 , !hot tlle boundartu not aurvoyocl oro ......., aa br-11- ploltod frOffl lnformotlol, f..,nd In -___ _ P• ____ , that !Na mop waa pr-rod In accorckl--G.S. 47-30 oo a"'"'""". WI-my orlalnal sl9notur1 , roolltrotlon nu-and HOI 1Na 16 lh day of Sl;PTEMBER , 19 M. ~) . /. >-'' / u .. "/4M<-;._, vV: 6 J-0:1-_,_ REGlSTlR~ LANO SURVEYOR Ncu/2679 NORTH CAROLINA GRANVILLE COUNTY I, a Notary Public of Ille County and State aforuold cortlfy !hot BonJomln L. Bryon, a R19lator1d Land Survoyor, poraonolly appoorod blforo mo 1h11 day and acknowledQod !ho ullCllllon of !ht loroQOlno lnatrumont. Wltllua my hGnd and official ,tamp or 11a4 !Na J.§_fli doy of SEPTEMBER , 19~ My cornmlallon oxplroa _,::0;:.9:.;/2:..7:..;/_:2:.:0:.:0:.:0c_ (1 •f ' (l I ,~)1 X .o• A-:::' \ I j PUBLIC AS BUILT SURVEYED FOR CRISTEX CORP. FISHING CREEK TOWNSHIP GRANVILLE COUNTY, N.C. DATE SEPTEMBER /6, /998 SCALE I .. = 100' FILE NO. /998/44 SURVEYED BY BEN L. BRYAN, P.A. P.O. BOX 1400 -118 W. McCLANAHAN ST. OXFORD, N.C. 27565 PH. (919) 690-1026 FAX 690-1125 ~ SEPTEM8ER 27, 2000 TO SHOW DRUM EXCAVATION AREA AND FIVE MONITORING g L-~_;::,._;::,. __ :;;:;::;:;_ ____ ~;;;. ... ___ ~------------------------------------------------------..:w~EL:,:L .. E~L:,:E~V,:'A~Tl~ON:,;.;c~o~A~D:;;l;:;F:~rEiiR~E~N~T_;P;,;;0;:;1N;,:r •. __________________________________ _. /998144 • • APPENDIX C RECEPTOR SURVEY DATA MP?;{\J,~~N!J<; !:n1;i111•1•ri,1,: & En1'irunme11111/ Solutions RESIDENTAL WELLS WITHIN 1/2 MILE RADIUS CRISTEX FACILITY OXFORD, NORTH CAROLINA MID-ATLANTIC JOB NO. 098R0705.05 Well No. Name Address 1 Dr. Michael Avant 503 Lewis Street 2 B & M Auto Body 517 Lewis Street 3 Finch Car Wash 521 Lewis Street 4 Al Sandling Chevrolet 613 Lewis Street 5 Wayne Brooks 704 Lewis Street 6 Zelma Brooks 706 Lewis Street 7 Katherine Latta 707 Lewis Street 8 Lil Dworsky 806 Lewis Street 9 Hoffman Suiu 807 Lewis Street • • ;!,)~~-:~'b <:l K, ~ •;,i ") ) L 'c -,1: .• .. ,\~)2~ ' ( ad \_ ',1,/gent;al~ ,,Ch ( /'-_rp a 1ar:1./, '-.: 11,~ .:'~~~;i~\ ~ -,~~( 0~ \r{ 0 , 1-( •~""[> p 9' '·, aa • ) """'t ~/~~~¥ti~~~ ~ ,)~\a • • ' • : ' ✓~'. I \, ' ' ' . / ' "'· \"--.. , '1 I • UT .LU.LU::, UT1010SB '--J L U I V,>. I VI __. Utility Billing Master File Lookup search field: SERV ADDRESS Opt Account# Name LEWIS ST. service Location 10:08:48 Meter# ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -A030-01440-00 VACANT, METER _'9'030-04470-00 VACANT, METER __..,.✓cj?0-01530-01 SNACKERS . -<..,/'030-01380-00 ELLINGTON'S BODY -:..----030-01410-01 ELLINGTON'S BODY = I 030-01560-00 WATKINS, MRS GEOR I 030-01500-03 MADRIGAL, BALTAZA _ I 030-01500-04 PEREZ, MARIA HERL ~ 030-01500-05 MARTINEZ, ANTONIO I 030-01530-02 ESTRADA JR, ABRAH _ I 030-01530-03 MARTINEZ, ANTONIO _ /030-01530-04 SANCHEZ, ABEL LOY 101 103 105 106 110 1/2 110 1/2 110 1/2 110-A 110-A 110-A Options: l=Select 2=New occupant 4=Delete LEWIS LEWIS LEWIS LEWIS LEWIS LEWIS LEWIS LEWIS LEWIS LEWIS LEWIS LEWIS Fl=Help F3=Exit F5=Refresh FlO=Add new location F12=Previous F14=Switch sort • ST. ST. ST. ST. ST. ST. ST. ST. ST. ST. ST. ST. + ULiUJ.U::, UT1010SB Utility Billing Master File Lookup Search field: SERV ADDRESS Opt Account# Name --llli.~30-01545-06 MARTINEZ, JORGE L _'9'"030-01545-07 JAVIER, MARTIN AL _ I 030-01470-01 ROGRIGUEZ, 0 YESE _ I 030-01470-02 TYLER, CAROL /BD I 030-01470-03 MANN, KEVIN DOUGL ---030-01470-04 JOHNSON, PEGGY SU I 032-00420-03 CHRISP, LARRY /032-00390-00 COPLIN JR, JOHN F I 032-00450-03 PEACE, MAE I 032-00360-09 WILKERSON, SAMANT _ I 032-00360-10 MORALES, FLORISEL _.__.,,.,---032-00360-ll SILVA, IVAN CAIN 110-B 110-B 112 112 112 112 116 118 119 120 120 120 LEWIS ST. service Location LEWIS LEWIS LEWIS LEWIS LEWIS LEWIS LEWIS LEWIS LEWIS LEWIS LEWIS LEWIS ST. ST. ST. ST. ST. ST. ST. ST. ST. ST. ST. ST. Options: l=Select 2=New Occupant 4=Delete Fl=Help F3=Exit F5=Refresh F12=Previous Fl4=Switch Sort • • FlO=Add new location 10:06:32 Meter# + u i .1v1.u::i UT1010SB \... J L U I v,i., VI U Utility Billing Master File Lookup search ,field: SERV ADDRESS Opt Account.# Name LEWIS ST. service Location 10:06: 56 Meter# ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- • 032-00480-00 VACANT, METER 121 = 032-00330-06 GLASSCOCK, ROBERT 122 I 032-00330-07 EROGLU, A SAMET 122 I 032-00330-08 JACKSON, JODY & C 122 _ I 032-00330-09 PELCASTRE, SANTIA 122 _ ..,--032-00330-10 JACKSON, JODY & C 122 __..--032-00300-00 EVANS, MRS DICK 124 _.,,.,...032-00270-02 KITTRELL, RODGER 126 I 034-00030-04 DOWNEY, DONNAIL / 201 _ ,,,,-034-00030-05 MONTANO, ANGELICA 201 _ __,,, 032-00240-00 HOBGOOD, JIM 207 I 032-00210-09 HUNT, MARGARET L 210 options: l=Select 2=New occupant 4=Delete LEWIS ST. LEWIS ST. LEWIS ST. LEWIS ST. LEWIS ST. LEWIS ST. LEWIS ST. LEWIS ST. LEWIS ST. LEWIS ST. LEWIS ST. LEWIS ST. Fl=Help F3=Exit F5=Refresh F10=Add new location F12=Previous F14=Switch sort + U I .LU.LU::, UT1010SB "-I L. U I V.ti,. l UL \,..<I Utility Billing Master File Lookup search field: SERV ADDRESS LEWIS ST. Opt Account# Name service Location Meter# ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -•032-00210-10 FIELDS, MICHAEL/ 210 LEWIS ST. _ 032-00210-11 ROYSTER, HATTIE 210 LEWIS ST. I 032-00210-12 ROYSTER, MARY ALI 210 LEWIS ST. ......---032-00210-13 JIMANEZ, RICARDO 210 LEWIS ST. / 032-00180-00 PAYNE, CHARLES N 211 LEWIS ST. I 032-00120-01 PREZAS-JIMENEZ, J 212 LEWIS ST. E 032-00120-02 CRUZ-GUADALUPE, A 212 LEWIS ST. I 032-00150-04 BLAS, ALEJANDRO C 213 LEWIS ST. I 032-00150-06 MORRISON, NIKKI J 213 LEWIS ST. I 032-00150-07 CRUZ-QUADALUPE, A 213 LEWIS ST. -/'ll32-00150-08 HUGHES, CURTIS TO 213 LEWIS ST. = <./032-00090-00 HOBGOOD, THOMAS W 214 LEWIS ST. + Options: l=Select 2=New occupant 4=Delete Fl=Help F3=Exit F5=Refresh FlO=Add new location F12=Previous Fl4=Switch sort • UT.LU.iUS UT1010SB L J L \.JI UA l U I .J Utility Billing Master File Lookup search field: SERV ADDRESS opt Account# Name _ LEWIS ST. service Location ..., ' .., -' .., 10:07:54 Meter# ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- _llii,032-00060-08 BLEND, TARA /CBS _'9032-00060-09 SAAVEDRA, BEATRIZ ____:;;,'032-00060-10 SAAVEDRA, BEATRIZ I 032-00030-04 ELLIOTT, ALICE C I 032-00030-05 TUNCAY, AKCAY I 032-00030-06 SUNER, MEHMET FES _ I 032-00030-07 EVANS, ROBERT G ___....,/032-00030-08 NULOCS HAIR SALON E 030-02850-00 VACANT, METER _ I 030-02850-01 HUSKETH, JAMES B _ I 030-02850-02 ROYSTER, ALTON _/030-02850-03 CROSS, LAURA 216 216 216 218 218 218 218 218 304 304 304 304 Options: l=Select 2=New occupant 4=Delete LEWIS ST. LEWIS ST. LEWIS ST. LEWIS ST. LEWIS ST. LEWIS ST. LEWIS ST. LEWIS ST. LEWIS ST. LEWIS ST. LEWIS ST. LEWIS ST. Fl=Help F3=Exit F5=Refresh F10=Add new location F12=Previous F14=Switch sort • • + UTlU.LUS UT1010SB Utility Billing Master File Lookup search field: SERV ADDRESS Opt Account# Name Ail 030-02880-03 VAZQUEZ, LUIS ENR '9!J)30-02880-04 MORALES, ROSENDO _~030-02970-01 OLIVER, THOMAS L I 030-02940-07 KEETON, GRACIE K -/030-02940-08 BOYD, WILLIAM DAV -/ 030-03030-00 WELCOME SERVICE C -I 070-01590-00 BURLINGTON INDUST ../070-01590-01 NEWTON INSTRUMENT _ /050-00060-06 BURLEY WAYNE CHAM _✓050-00120-03 BOWLING, BONITA _ ___,,,050-00150-00 BROYAL, LONNIE _ /050-00130-00 HIGHTOWER, JAMES Options: l=Select 2=New occupant 306 306 308 310 310 312 325 325 402 405 413 414 _ LEWIS ST. service Location LEWIS ST. LEWIS ST. LEWIS ST. LEWIS ST. LEWIS ST. LEWIS ST. LEWIS ST. LEWIS ST. LEWIS ST. LEWIS ST. LEWIS ST. LEWIS ST. 4=Delete Fl=Help F3=Exit F5=Refresh Fl2=Previous F14=Switch sort FlO=Add new location • • Meter# + UTlU.LUS UT1010SB I,,.,_ I l.' U I U.1io. l U I U Utility Billing Master File Lookup search field: SERV ADDRESS LEWIS ST. Opt Account# Name service Location 10:08:09 Meter# ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 050-00180-04 MCGRATH, JOANN/ 419 050-00180-05 BOWLING, BONITA 419 _ 050-00030-00 HOCKETT, HELEN D 422 / 050-00210-00 WESCO INC 424 c./ 050-00250-00 KNOTT, MRS JAMES 425 -I 050-00240-01 NUMBERS CHILD CAR 426 -/050-00240-02 NUMBERS CHILD CAR 426 = I 050-00270-03 ASIA CHINESE REST 430 /050-00270-04 PJ'S 430 = I 050-00290-01 AVANT, DR MICHAEL 503 ,i.., I .•. _ 050 00290 02 AVANT, DR-M-lCHAEL 503 1'-'~~ _ ,A50-00295-00 LEADER HOMES 511 Options: l=Select 2=New occupant 4=Delete LEWIS LEWIS LEWIS LEWIS LEWIS LEWIS LEWIS LEWIS LEWIS LEWIS LEWIS LEWIS Fl=Help F3=Exit F5=Refresh Fl2=Previous F14=Switch Sort FlO=Add new location 0 ST. ST. ST. ST. ST. ST. ST. ST. ST. ST. [:: ST. ST. + "-I 1... U, V ✓-., vi -.. U i .LU.LU:, UT1010SB Utility Billing Master File Lookup 10:08:09 Search field: SERV ADDRESS ----~L~EW~I~S"---=S~T~----- Opt Account# Name Service Location Meter# --/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------ --050-00299-00 BETTS & SON FUNER 512 LEWIS ST. Jal' 050-00300-06 NATOSHA & WILLIE 515 LEWIS ST. I 050-00300-07 AFTERMATH TATOOIN 515 LEWIS ST. = I 050-00300-08 ALEJO, LEOPOLDO/ 515 , LEWIS ST. /050-00300-09 SUPERIOR USED CAR 515 / LEWIS ST. -/050-00395-00 CHARLES HESTER 518, LEWIS ST . .--050 00360 00 FINO~ Cl'.R 1/.'ASI I 571('.j/l~ ✓ LEWIS ST .Q.) ,;-{)'50-00400-00 PERRY BROS TIRE C 606 LEWIS ST. I 050-00510-00 TRAILORS, JAMES B 609 6 / LEWIS ST. OSQ 00480 QQ AL SAPWLHJG CIIEVR 613G-?.<' LEWIS ST .cf) E 050-00540-00 AL SANDLING CHEVR 613 LEWIS ST . .,....-4)50-00570-04 MECKLINBURG UTILI 615 LEWIS ST. Options: l=Select 2=New occupant 4=Delete Fl=Help F3=Exit F5=Refresh F10=Add new location F12=Previous F14=Switch sort • 0 .5"17 Lcw,5 <f) (S•"'1 AvT~ 6,,,./::J + UIJ..U.LU::, UT1010SB '1...ll. UI v,,iulU Utility Billing Master File Lookup search field: SERV ADDRESS ---~ ,.L_,,.EW,.,_I=S"------'S"-'T'--'.'----- Opt Account# Name service Location Meter# ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -070-01890-08 FRESENIUS MED'L # 625 LEWIS ST. ='9050-00600-00 GRAY'S AUTO SALES 700 LEWIS ST . .:----050-00870-01 ROSE MART # 8 703 -fu1I LEWIS ST. -050 00650 01 BR001(5, 'i/AYPJE 704 5..!aJ ~ LEWIS ST. (ff} ..-----050-00840-02 MAZATLAN MEXICAN 705 LEWIS ST. 050 00660 01 BROOKS, ZELMA 7U6Si'~ -t-&ri,a._ LEWIS ST.@ 050 QQ790 00 LATTA, KATIIERINE 707 SE¢ 16-A•< LEWIS ST 6) I 050-00690-01 BREWER, BARBARA N 708 LEWIS ST. I 050-00690-02 CALHOUN, GARY W 708 LEWIS ST. E 050-00690-03 ENGLEBRIGHT, TRAC 708 LEWIS ST. I 050-00780-07 BESCHLER, JAMES L 709 LEWIS ST. I 050-00780-08 AVERETTE, ANN BRO 709 LEWIS ST. + Options: l=Select 2=New occupant 4=Delete Fl=Help F3=Exit F5=Refresh FlO=Add new location F12=Previous F14=Switch sort • 0 UTlUlUS UT1010SB Utility Billing Master File Lookup . .., I .._,..,, ~ ._ 10:08:25 Search field: SERV ADDRESS ---~ ~L~EW=I=S,<_,S~T~-~--- Opt Account# Name service Location Meter# -=jgi8=88~~8=8i-~~~~~~~~~~s~~~~~~-~~~~:--------t~~~~-~~~--------------------- -I 050-00720-09 STEWART, JANET K 712-A LEWIS ST. _ ~0-00720-10 FORBES, MICHAEL V 712-A LEWIS ST. _:...---050-00750-03 EVANS, ROBERT G 712-B LEWIS ST. _ ____..,-0-70-01680-04 ANCIENT IRON CYCL 718 LEWIS ST. _ E 050-00770-00 JONES, VIRGINIA 719 LEWIS ST. _1!07 -01710-02 LA GUARECITA /SM 726 LEWIS ST. 0-01650-00 SHERMAN & BODDIE 730 LEWIS ST. -0-01740-00 SHERMAN & BODDIE 730 LEWIS ST. -.,,,-OJ0-01770-00 SHERMAN & BODDIE 730 LEWIS ST. = /U70-01800-01 HARRIS'S AUTO SER 800 LEWIS ST. + Options: l=Select 2=New occupant 4=Delete Fl=Help F3=Exit F5=Refresh Fl0=Add new location Fl2=Previous Fl4=Switch sort • UTllJlUS UT1010SB \..... j L u I U)I. I u I u Utility Billing Master File Lookup 10:08:48 search field: SERV ADDRESS ---~ =L~EW~I~S"----"S~T~----- Opt Account# Name service Location Meter# -c------------------------------------------------------------------------ 070-01830-00 CROWN MOTEL 804 LEWIS ST. -0 01840 00 EATON CUSTOMIZEQ 806-kS't"0, LEWIS ST. = --070 01850 01 OXFORD USED 'fIIU,S 806-B SE;_W LEWIS ST.@) ?CJ 7 l/~1µ1S @ -070 01855-00 bA CHARRITA MEX F 806-c5c:-·(Ci LEWIS ST. -I 050-00420-00 ROBERT EVANS GRI 809 LEWIS ST. I 050-00275-01 LEADER HOME SALES 500 LEWIS ST. EXT =------070-01353-00 CAREWELL HOTEL, I 1000 LINDEN AVE. I 070-01352-00 CUSTOM BUILDERS 1010 LINDEN AVE. -~__:::.01352-01 ALAN VESTER DAEWO 1010 LINDEN AVE. -~-01110-00 BOYDS PONTIAC OLD 1025 LINDEN AVE. = ____,.-070-01100-00 BOYD OLDSMOBILE 1025 LINDEN AVE. I 070-01355-00 KING'S INN MOTEL 1100 LINDEN AVE. + Options: l=Select 2=New occupant 4=Delete Fl=Help F3=Exit F5=Refresh FlO=Add new location F12=Previous F14=Switch Sort • • • I. I MapQuest: Maps: print 503 Lewis St Oxford, NC 27565-3581, us All rights reserved Use Sub~ License/CQl1Y...!:i.Q..tl This map Is informational only. No representation Is made or warranty given as to its content. User assumes all risk of use. MapQuest and its suppliers assume no responsibllity for any loss or delay resulting from such use. Privacy Policy & J._egal Notices © 2002 MapQuest.com, Inc. All rights reserved. Page I of I • 0 MapQuest: Maps: print 517 Lewis St Oxford, NC 27565-3581, us All rights reserved. Use Subject to License/CoQY..d.Qb..t This map is informational only. No representation is made or warranty given as to its content. User assumes all risk of use. MapQuest and its suppliers assume no responsibility for any loss or delay resulting from such use. Privacy Policy & Legal Notices © 2002.MapQuest;com, Inc. All rights reserved. Page I of I • 0 MapQuest: Maps: print 521 Lewis St Oxford, NC 27565-3581, us All rights reserved, Use Subject to ~~ID'!!9D.1 This map is informational only. No representation is made or warranty given as to its content. User assumes all risk of use. MapQuest and its suppliers assume no responsibility for any loss or delay resulting from such use. Privacy: PoliCY.. & Legal Notices © 2002.MapQuest.com, Inc. All rights reserved. Page I of I • • MapQuest: Maps: print 613 Lewis St Oxford, NC 27565-3523, us All rights reserved. use Subject to l,,icense/CopY!:i9._b! This map is informational only. No representation is made or warranty given as to its content. User assumes all risk of use. MapQuest and its suppliers assume no responsibility for any loss or delay resulting from such use . Privacy Policy: & h~_g_~I Notice..s. © 2002 MapQuest.com, Inc. All rights reserved. Page I of I • 0 • MapQuest: Maps: print 704 Lewis St Oxford, NC 27565-3526, us All rights reserved, Use Subiect to Ucense/(00'.Iig!J.! . . .. fAV'TGCl-o-lJ ff§€$ 6 · This map is informational only. No representation is made or warranty given as to its content. User assumes all risk of use. MapQuest and its suppliers assume no responsibility for any loss or delay resulting from such use . Privacy Policy: & Lggal Notices © 2002 MapQuest.com, Inc. All rights reserved. Page I of I • • • MapQuest: Maps: print 706 Lewis St Oxford, NC 27565-3526, us All rights reseryed. Use Subject to ~KQP...'i.C!9..til This map is informational only. No representation is made or warranty given as to its content. User assumes all risk of use. MapQuest and its suppliers assume no responsibility for any loss or delay resulting from such use. Privacy Policy: & l,_eqal Notices © 2002 MapQuest.com, Inc. All rights reserved. Page I of I • • • MapQuest: Maps: print 707 Lewis St Oxford, NC 27565-3525, us \ ' / I/ 02002 MapQue~t.com, Inc.; 02002 GOT, Inc./ M_d_ghts reserved~~ License/ Co p..YJ:igJJJ; / ' // This map is informational only. No representation is made or warranty given as to its content. User assumes all risk of use. MapQuest and its suppliers assume no responsibility for any loss or delay resulting from such use . Privacy Policy & l_~gal Notices © 2002 MapQuest.com, Inc. All rights reserved. Page 1 of I 7 • • 0apQuest: Maps: print 806c Lewis St Oxford, NC 27565-3528, us This map is informational only. No representation is made or warranty given as·to its content; User assumes. all risk of use. MapQuest and !ts suppliers assume no responsibility for any loss or delay resulting from such use. Privacy Policy & Legal Notices © 2002 MapQuest.com, Inc. All rights reserved. Page I of I • • APPENDIX D SENSITIVE ENVIRONMENTS SURVEY DATA • MP?;¾J7~{\fiTl<; En1-:ine1•rin!i & l::nl'ironm1'11tal Solluions • • • B.2. Terrestrial Ecological Evaluation Checklist 1. What is the approximate area of the site? '11& DOO square feet 2. What is the approximate area of contamination? 2!50,0:0 square feet 3. Is there evidence of dead domestic animals or wildlife in the area of contamination? __ Yes ___u:'.'.'.No. If yes, please contact the branch. 4. The land use on the site is: __ ¾Uman __ %Rural __ % Residential .5Q...% Industrial 0;ght, _heavy) __ % Agricultural ,_ ____ crops) __ % Recreational Additional description ( e.g., park) The land use within a 1/4 mile of the site is: __ ¾Uman __ %Rural __ % Residential % Industrial ( /light, v'beavy)-CJC\ c j., __ % Agricultural ,_ ____ crops) __ % Recreational Additional description ( e.g., park) S:;01 ;__ ?01 a.Jee.= we+lc:v.d 5lc0' .,_ w' o.:-ea. = wet-I c--nd -'0 /o (II, 2CO 8-2) -\0 °lo of S.rt8 ;;:,,-5L"iL __ % Undisturbed __ ¾Other Zoning __ % Undisturbed ¾Other Zoning __ _ 5. Are there any threatened or endangered plant or animal species known to inhabit the site or the area within a 1/4 mile of the site? __ Yes ~o. If yes, please provide a list of these species and evaluate the potential for these species to come into contact with the contaminated soil at the site. 6. Is the site identified as a critical habitat for any terrestrial species? __ Yes /No (Refer to the "Environmentally Sensitive Areas'.' on pages 15 and 16.) 7. Are there more than five acres ofundistumed, rural or agricultural land contiguous with the site that are unlikely to be developed and serve as a natural area attractive to terrestrial ecological receptors? __ Yes V No (Use information from number 4, talk to zoning officials, county planners, city planners and owners, and then document evaluations and conclusions.) La:O.:ted 1n 1nou~tno.l1·c.ed t-0rh6n of Q\(_f'orc\. B -3 Page 1 of l • • • Kathy Roush From: Pender, Danielle R. [penderdr@MAIL.WILDLIFE.STATE.NC.US] Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2002 2:58 PM To: 'wayne_randolph@hotmail.com'; 'wrandolph@maaonline.com'; 'Kroush@maaonline.com' Cc: Dale Suiter ('dale_suiter@fws.gov'); Johnson Ratcliffe, Judith Subject: environmental information for Oxford site This e-mail correspondence is pursuant to your telephone request for environmental information for a superfund site located ½ mile west of Industrial Drive and Route 15 in Oxford (Granville County), North Carolina. According to your representation of the location, the site drains to Jordan Creek, which is a tributary of the Tar River. Although we do not have records for aquatic or terrestrial wildlife species from the immediate area, there are multiple records for federal and state listed aquatic species such as the federally and state endangered Tar River spinymussel (£1/iptio steinstansana) and dwarfwedgemussel (Alasmidonta heterodon) in the Tar River downstream of this site. Therefore, we advise that specialized efforts and techniques be implemented to reduce runoff from any onsite activities. Thank you for your inquiry. If you need further assistance concerning this matter, please contact our office at (919) 528-9886. ******************************** Danielle R. Pender Piedmont Region Coordinator Habitat Conservation Program NC Wildlife Res. Comm. 1142 1-85 Service Rd. Creedmoor, NC 27522 Phone: 919/528-9886 Fax: 919/528-9839 penderdr@mail. wildlife.s tate.nc. us ******************************** 10/10/2002 • '"r .,..1.._ Job Name: f1 ., 1...,,. Mid-Atlantic Associates Field Notes s·+ ,, I e, Date: 9-27-02- Job Number: 705.06' Technician: SLe~Aer Task Number: Weather: /'' ',,f Location:,.</_ A_ Arrival: Departure: Notes: • € ob ~ ... k 0coe! S'tta -qqq I; -r I 5 -;; G 5e ~.}<; "' H,Lh ~d}vs-::z " 5<f - • 111 /. t1wsbJJ fJf 'r'!i-ti' lo f;;J. -i< es ou..rc t. ,tl,,,1 Dyl a. iµ.¥1-,,l.-,,J 'fl? I cJl.,cJ 'fiL/0 -q C/9( f ~o cc&hcy r r>--'L W'-'l 2 -# 'S . fo\i. ~-tl~~""R :z1s -2 ros1 (hf/.. /11 Mt,"' /,;1-I -{. t,F7 /'Tr >>/r<o(.," ",-V& IC to-M,1-,-l /() -2 ...!.. . IQ -'-I e !u : ..,~- { 17Y1.14-(11,G{.1,i,,7/e7 -/cF7 r;1c·S",r/",t' 10-lf: '-._ 01,t oP 71,,,-cF,r,c(, 71.,·sw"-i:r/(_ fi_~/1-· l ,0111 Equipment/ Expendables Used: Page _L_ of Signature maafiefdnotes.xl • • Job Name: Job Number: Task Number: Location: Notes: Mid-Atlantic Associates Field Notes Date: Technician: Weather: Arrival: Departure: I . ., (J.1...1 r"').L OJi Z-·'5 'tr,-,1,,,, 1-27 ) £.,;tl-~ l\cJlk ;361..id ''wt h@l-no ,a,{), cef ,,...d,?Jj v/ia,f Equipment/ Ei<penda les·Used: / 7 Page ~ _ of Signature maafieldnotes.xl • Job Name: Job Number: Task Number: Location: Notes: Mid-Atlantic Associates Field Notes Date: Technician: Weather: Arrival: Departure: -/J( btv. d-H.-o 6 (,l f'.£.' ¥ Dekeicc,} ... 0&Jer1 733-(q 510 \)e,b~ Wtv\ ;SA,--). ukL wtN'-4 w! L,,0..1 ',l T',s t..J·e,,.-f<r . I ,, ew:by? 11 s Ju_ l~oke ,j, C','\. Mt:,_{) ,-/1/C J) ,v IS /I){\ /J~ l { ~ t (NM, ll¥ ~ore6 + (!~$'1W-C(,S. 3o~ +r "'1'" r:-2--:; { 5~15 pe,/;'&) Equipment r Expendables· Used:: • Page . .3. of Signature maafieldnotes.xl Job Name: Job Number: Task Number: Location: Notes: Mid-Atlantic Associates Field Notes Date: Technician: Weather: Arrival: Departure: -/;/.S F,'t;k Y lv1·J)J,-/t ~rv,cL ,J:J, H~+,,.,.,---J5ic·'--1520-X(/ G ¾IM J P wdw,,, -L e / f-M-!M a_ ")-?-:::::: -;'JC l-,,'/oi. f,'Je l<.~S:OV.,rCLS Cornm,)SIIYI -'fa,,,,.!'. ;tfc/jo·/4 'J.5;)..-'-(Sl-)53'-I t~ff /1'tl4<la~ lcr-7 u,11 £"s-~e-10-2-02.. ( Se;-1:' P/Yj'-" S-) ~ !l/0 AA 1111 ,,ii-S'+a-4 ,Zo 1-713 -~, t./ s x 17 3 ---c,Jikl Mw:pky & )t/c,,,v £-f,...,,f ➔ f-27:- • ,, T d ot1·t kr'low '(d'-''J te co.,l/,n0 1 /llrJtrA-~ nt,H,,y..7 h, Jo u Ti1A t\.,_,. o.r-e~ . 11 -NC. . I ,l pe g_,_... v / R ~ n , ~ · S ,.,; o:, r l -1::;:;t 1,/hQ l Equipment/ Expendables Used: • Page ..:L_ of Signature maafieldnotes.xl • Job Name: Job Number: Task Number: Location: Notes: • c,;, lZ. Mid-Atlantic Associates Field Notes Date: . Technician: Weather: Arrival: I / e f + fYU:W a yv: 14:20 Departure: 9-2 7 10-9-0-z. 5jz&&4,/15.,,1, Cvfi-Jt.,v ,, D~,v,v-llv ts out: aF 74,, oF,t:=,c;,- ) ✓ Equipment/ Expendables Used: • Page 6 of Signature maafiefdnotes.xl • • . Job Name: Job Number: Task Number: Location: Notes: Mid-Atlantic Associates Field Notes Date: Technician: Weather: Arrival: Departure: ,I I' lvo occ.u,zt?,6-,vf'.d',;J ;:r,,.,./ 14-tc..."J•✓IV./ ,"),_. /:.rJT!. . ./. Driv,J /(f:baN Th1; 3,,1J 1:-fr,,/1: I, tte II (V'C -ES. "t"-'5. Gov Al C. l(f.vc-u ~.u n-h/4--;;, t,,.,.1e .,.,,h o-v.rn- [~ 6'Z> /' /J-9 l--$) D 1,./ +re F /0 · 2 • 0 L Io< 1-S-,._, Equipment·/ Expendables-Used:· • Pag~. __!_ of Signature maafieldnotes.xl • • • Job Name: Job Number: Task Number: Location: Mid-Atlantic Associates Field Notes Date: Technician: Weather: Arrival: Departure: Notes: us F orz-,,-5 7 S' ~11 , cb s / ,, h,9-v,,-,<,;;; 5; h,,,., 61<>1.vvilf,. C,.,. 10-z-oz /0-U/•oz_ 2,·.3\j> M. l)S, J-ON.At: ?,QA ,l )-{ [" Q I v-,Q ('1 0 0 °b ITT Q,..N H, Q O O CD Equipment:/ Ei<pendables,Used: Page 7' of . --· Signature maafieldnotes.xl • • • Job Name: Job Number: Task Number: Location: Notes: Mid-Atlantic Associates Field Notes r I)., 57c-t-5 ,-7 V' . Date: 10 -4-~-Z... Technician: w ,; ;;::_. Weather: Arrival: Departure: l • !I /4 j'\ -.; ....,. , ~ , ... (,,/, _____ , __ . _o_,c__;ac._:__;;,..:_l;c.,r__:_,.cc'~''-·~....:'':.;:":..__/:..::'-..:.-'~.;...'· '-::._".;...:;,·_c.,_..:.l_·-_..:_/_,1_._ .. ;.._/_:..:.frc....:l_~_;.·'-.:~ ___ _,.;_i_:J_'. •....;:.O_· --°'-'-'' Cl .z_ 10-7-oz_ +-S' - . ! •;'/!..,,~} · ...... , -·' ,,,· ,.,;_., .-~· I0/8' /07., Wt:'A✓ 7 7v o;:-F,ei:-R..~Vttf"-;_,,,..c/ "'1:f? ";/ IH,;. Sp,v,-;r"' 74rnt<,n<,,-,<,c> S<.r-,._;,7,;,v f2t.C9t,ne..• ,,.;, "'><-,.,o?'>(. ~ ~,,c J";7v-. Equipment/ Expendables Used: Page _J:__ of Signature 77 maafieldnotes.xl • • Job Name: Job Number: Task Number: Location: Notes: Mid-Atlantic Associates Field Notes c. R, s11r)( 5',7,_,, Date: Technician: Weather: Arrival: ro lrloz.. · €- I , Equipment/ Expendables Used: Page _j_ of Signature maafieldnotes.xf Departure: • APPENDIX E CURRENT DEED TO PROPERTY MP?;~Jl~~N!}S: £11ginc1'ri11g & Enl'ironmenta/ Sululion,1 • • w.-.TK1N8 • 11:0MUNOIION 1◄• COLL•oa ., .. rn . , . ,. c~IK 165 IIl,l 508 NOHTH CAROLINA GH1\NVl LLE COUNTY :.: ,,, ' THl S DEEi) made and entered in to this the __::_L·_ (I ay of /\uqu'.;t, !96t_;, hy and.between John fl. Nelms, Widower, John JL f-klms and wife, Mary Ruth C, Nr:lms, parties ol' the first port, tu i:t.cinf'cld MilJs, Inc., of Oxf'oI·d, North C_orollna, purly of the sr:cond part; W 1 TN ES S ~ ·r ~!: Thal the s8.id purtlr!s of the first part for and In ,:on:;!d~rulion of' the µay1nenl to Uwm lly. thP, satd party CJf th~ second part of UH: sum of ten dollars and other goud and valu 11,1],1 ls~dqed, de hcPP-hy 9ivc 1 nrant, barg0.ln, sel I and conv~,y unto the s;,.1id party or t.!w :;cco,id part, lt.~ <1~•slnns ·and succr!!.i~o1·s ln orric~:, a CP.rlain Lract or rarr;(:J or lnnd lylnfJ and brdnri i;ftunle 111 Oxford Town~hip, Granvi•lln County, Nurll1 Carolina, and belnq more particularly d~~scrlh~d as fol lows: Bl~GlNNlNIJ at an iron pin in Lhe t~astr~rn rnarnln of lndu~- \.1'v llrlvc and 30 reel rrom the cen\er linr-i thereof, suld ll'On pin a!So bcinri in the southern marnln of ~~011U1crn Hallway rlnht-of- wc;y :u1d ~;n I'1~•~t rrorn tlu~ c~:ntc,· llnr! \.h1:reof, ond runnlrHJ th.-:111:1: c1Jon11 the soutlwrn 111arnln 0f said Railw,1y rinht-of-way and :Jo {'(~(?t rroio the c,rntP.r lln~ therP.of N. '70° 1'.)1 £, 1!106,0 reel Lo an irt'n pln In th!"? li1H.: of s, V. Morton, Jr.; thence tllonn !\fort1m1:, ltn,, :;, 2n° 101 W. fJ/\J.O f'c,il too :it.on<: in said Moi·tont;, line; l11r:111;1i N. ;._lo ()(:I w. l6.(l feel to a stal{1;; thGnc1~ N. n7° ()JI 1,1,/, fl(i';.O f'ft:l, to on iron pin in t.he eastern rnarriln of lnduslry Drive; thenc·c along t.he eastern margin or said Industry Urive: a1id JO fe,:!t rro111 the r:•~nler line the~·e f' N-2° 3r,1 E. 216,3 !'P.t'~L to llw polnl o:r lnirilnnln~J, conLalnlr 11.11 Dl:r(~~, 111l•r11 01' !(:\:;'.;, accordlnn to mnp of -Johnnie C, Currin, ll •• S., Crom h_l:; ~•urvcy or ;\pril 21, 196.S, and being the same tract or parcel of land conveyed to John H. Nelms, widower, et al, by First C:iti;:t'ns Banlt & Trust Company, he dc!-!d dutcrl October 10, 19S?, of n~cord In Elooh 1J2, at pane 6~!6, Granville County Hegistry. TO !!AV[ /\Nil TO llOLD the said tract or parcel of land, with all of the privikge:, and appu1·tenanGes thf!1'e1mto fH!IOnflinrr uid.o the sulcl party of the second par.t, lts usslnns and successor:· In office, in fee simple fornvnr. /\nd the• said parties of the ·first part cuvt~nµnt and a·11rue Lo and with the said party of the second part, that they ar,~ seized or said tract or parcel of land in fee, and tiave th8 • • l!ICIMUNCl&ON • rl9ht to convey the same in fee simple; that the t;nme Is free and c !ear from <my and all encumbnmc:es, and that they do her,~hy w~rrar1t anrl wl II fo1·evir defend tt1c title to the same ngaf11st. th~ Jav1f'11l claim:; and demands of any and all persons whorwoocve1·, lN TESTIMONY W!!l~REOF, the: snld partlc~s of' the first part hav,·.! hnreunto ~;ct. their hnnd'._; u.nd '.;cal;,, th!;, U1ti dny and (iH.'\N\.'l LIY COUNTY_ ) l, ___ {~_i'--r,,.--' (·/ -~/(1:·; /r\<,,,,.f, ;1 Nnt.c1ry Put1lir: or Lhc t:OUl'ly :.md '.>l<il.f: art11••.::C>tdd, du fwr~hy C:(:rtify that on tills ilay p(!f:>m1al ly o.pp(:ared lrc!'orr~ me, John I(, Nelms, wldo1•wr; Joti11 I\, l-lcl111:; <rnd wire:, Mary Huth C. Ni!lm~,, ~lqn<:rs and ~;c;:ilr![''._; of th;~ f,:i.rcrioin'.l and hr:yr,t.(; ann•~:-u:cl tkcd and 'acknowlt~,J~~d t.hP. di11_: •:>;•:•.:u- 1.i(in or Ll1<: ;;;:unc for Ll1P. purpu::(!::. Lh>'.rt~ln :;et roru,. V!i tnc~;~; my ti;rnd and .rwl:11• I al sr.nl, ___,~CC-ce·: L!..,...;_0/___ I ~)6!) • i. I ,', ' .)'' •Notary I I ' l ! I l ,, Puhl.le ••:<, !.TH \ \i(; H !i: \, ~ ·, ,,!:"I 1,:1, /•TL ( !I i :1.1:1:.lt .{ ,, .. ,,:. . Ii•,· I I'. " ·1;1< \ ,•II• .. ,i(~ •\lj ,;,t{{:,r.·,..-_., e,. ~7~-Xd.:_ {'n.,;,1y, ;,ttr:~\Cd by _.,,:II ,.-,1 ,,,.;.,,_.; l•.I l,.-·. ::,,.-,,·,_•ll: i,·l 1111: • :,,1--1:\.. in ,.1\11: lorn• :,::,\1 \HlU'lll ,·,,Ill \ht' ,,._, ·I, .... , ; ., 1,:c'.i.;1• : lil1,:~,;:: 1,,y 1,:11,d, :1 .. :, 'lt:J..d;,y nl •✓¢P.a'.d.;fe:' .. .··· I I :s . /_·· I -.r led !'or rfl,rl!'ltration t!J-1~_µ°..4'.-_d8.7 of..---~"9'? ·_!i.U.Cf...:'r ... ( ... , 'itJ(~,.J, _./...~ .. ·--·-·-0' oloo.tl..L..::... M. and Regiahred 1 YJ_e, Office of Hc1o1 t;;.1 •·..1.: .Qeella fro: Gruville County. N.C .• Book Nts···L'.> .. J ............ Page No ..... J.{S ~ I)'.); ru ~.... . ot D08da Re1i,■tar / • NUcn'11 UAl.:.ULlN.'\, ) ) G:~i\NVILJ,C: COUNT'{.) l'D'IK 165 1/M 513 ' 'l'IIVS u1::1::u, hade thb ttu~ _j/f_._driy of /\ll!~lt.<;t, l.'.HiS, by C Lncn lnve:;tors, Inc., a North C11rolinn corpora ti.on, 1•i.tt,11_·rl., Jr., 1.rncl J. J-.:. Nr-.l.rw>, n[ C:ninvi.1.1.~ t:nulll:y, i'l1)rl:i1 (!:n:oli.n:1, p:irti.c~; of the first pnrt, tn .Stei.(1CeLrl '.:li.Ll.s, lnc,, u.[ (JJ;[0nl,. t•l(Jrth Carol inn, parl:y of the ~;e;cnnd part, 1.11tl1;_:r·il. :J:1vi.:-: c:onvc;ycd to Cinco l11vct:to1.·s, Inc., scvcr.·nl. l:t·:H~I;:; o[ l.nud incl_tH_li.t,g n~ 'l'ri1ct No. Two thC'. tn.,ct o[ l.nncl l.;1n1;, \,•hi.ell dcr:d 1_1f trlt.S t ].,t; of 1.·c•.cord i.n nec:r1 of Tr·u:, t; Dn1)l· ,. d1~.st:t·i.bed, i11 \,:hich dee.cl 1Jeorgc •-:. llnnicl.1 ,J. !(. lirynn, Jr., l.oui.~ J~. 11utchi.nso11, John i..!:. l'ittnrd, Jr., and J. 1( .. Nr~Lm~,. "lli.rector.s and )tockl1ol.dcr:,", si.i~ned G-stntc~c.nt nt thi-. r:nd • • • ,\DJK 1.65 \'M;\ 514 cn1 FP.hnin17 l.1, L9611,·nnd on FP.brunry 11 1 L9G4, ·nn entry of:: c,rncr-.\.1.ntion of :;aid tlec<l o[ trust upon the 1nnrrtin of. t:h(i n~conl tllcrcol: was 11w(le by the n.cgi!1tcr of: Dc0.rls of: Grnnvill.c Cnllnty p11'rsu,u1t t:o the exhibition of: se.id not;c :mrl deed of: t1·t18t i)(.Jth tnnrke.(J pt1id by the sair.l Annie M::w s. noviH, tile llol.dt•r n1td owner o[ said bone\ nncl deed. ol: trust; nncl wt10rcns, \.:e11 l''.'/'. :.:: • l)nn i.e I., .! . J(. Bryt1n, Jr. , Lou Ls !~. Hutcli in.<-;on, ,lohn l~. 11 i.t:t:1rd 1 Jr. nnd ,J. K. Ncl.rns were nt: the ti.me of: s:ii.d cn11v(~y:rncc ni1cl_ sr1id crinccll.ntion, aw~ nmv arc, nl.l of the pat·t :t_ny i[).tercs_t wl1i.ch they or Any of tllc111 may hnvc or cl.nim ;11HJ -i.11 consi.d~·•xati.on oi' $1.00 paid ~o the pnrties of t:l\r\ fi.rsl: p:.1rt by the ~aid rnn·ty o!_. the ~ccont1 1~11rt, the. rcc~~i.p1: 0\: \,,1bl.el1 i.s l1er~by full.y .nc!tt101~l.e<l:~c.cl, 8Hi.d p;,il·tie,•; ot -i:hc fi.r~t port· lu1vc cel!liscd nm'. ec Lensed, nncl by t:he::;c prcsl~ntt; they rlc, hereby r:•.11d.st~, rcte,""1:-::u nnc\ forever qui.tclnim unto the pn1.·ty of l:hc-. t10.co11cl p:,1rt, i.ts :--niccessnrs ontl 1.wsi:,;ns, nLl ri,0,ht, t:lt:Le, cJ.aiP1 nm\ -Lntcrcr.l 01' the rmrtics ol: tin~ Ei.rt:t pnrt. iu nrn1 to nny portion of tiie tr11ct ol land .-.:1bovc r.et'e,Tc.d to, :•ttd pnrl:~- ·c:l1\.nrly dct:cri\.Jed a:, fol.lows: iJ:~ginning at: un iron pin on the nortl1ern ~J(lC of: Imlrn:l:ry Dr:ive .~ml 30 .feet fl·om the center line thereof, cnrnor: of the l.nnd o_t 0. V. I--101·tun, Jr., nnd runni.n;t thence nlong the. no1·l:hcrn <lllll l:lll.'.t1 cnr-:tcrn tnnqii.ns of ~nit.I Inc.1uRtry IJrive N. !:\7° 2G' \l. 457-.ii !:eel:; thence a curved Line lOl.l.L16 feet in 1.engt"h nnd lwvini1, a rmli.us 01: 77.2 fcctb thence N. ')0 55 1 H. 275.0 i:cct, N. ;/-' 31.' \~. 99.0 feet ancl i\'. l U~• W. 21.lG.4 feet to rrn 1.ron pi'.n in t:ltc • lO!IK 185 ;,,111'515 ,eastern margi.n of Industry Urive nnc\ 30 feet from the Ctc'.nter Linc thereof;; thence 1:i. a7<.l 03 1 ,~. B69.0 feet ton stnk.c; ti1c11cc J.· 2° 00 1 ~-86.0 feet ton s~one in tl1e Li.ne r,f 8. V. Morton, .Jr.; thenC'.e nl.ong Hor·tn11'3. I.i.nc S. 25{) l1t1' \.1 · ti:i2. / fcr~t to the point of ~cginnin[_'.;, a~d contc_1inin~~ :ic rc_s, more or l.csi:, accord tn:,.,; to mn11 of .Johnn 1.c C, Cur 1: tn, •-~-L-~i., from ltis sm·vcy of April 21., l9G5, nncl bein~; ttn~ Dnlll~ l.:rnd. cunvcyecl to l;c~orr.::e ti:. Dnnicl nnd wife, et al., by l\nnie tln1.! ;J:ivi.s tind ·1iusbimd, Lutl1er. IL D11vi.s, by <lced d:it(~d .J:munry 3L, L90~, of rccl1J'.·d in Unok l'.59, nt: pngc SL1.3, •.:1·1111villc ·l!olm1:y Ltegistr.y, 'l'U 11/\VE /\ND TO IIOLil 'l'lic :ifor~~:nid i.ntet·(~f:t in ,•;nici ·l:1·:1ct or i:i11rcC_1 oi: I.and, Hn<l al.I. pri.vi.l.P./\CS ;111d ap1.it.tr.·tcn,,.1w('.S t:itl.t!, r.l.ai.111 nr· int:cret;t of the· r:inrt:i.c:~ of .the fi.n:t pnrl:, nr .J. K.· dr:,':.1n, .Jr., J.01ti.!J r,{. 11utclti_nson, Jot-in E. l'i.ttnn:, J,:--., ,111c! J. J(. Nelm:;; l1:1vc hcr(~unto .sub!:;r;ribcd i::hcir. nnr:1t\;, nttr.l :il:fi:-:cd l:i1ci_1· ~:t:;11.s, tl1i.s l:!\e d:iy :111d yenr fir~\: f1hovc wri.tten. • • • ', -/~_;.:...··" :·/'/• :.,).·; Nt 1.~Tll C:1\:~ULH!1\, ) ) . 1; .:,\['NlLln:. (:lJlJNT·1·.) ( :-: i·:1\J ,) ( . fl' f . I . •: J., .. I..C.,{c .-) ·,. -J LLJ'l~ f!..:1.!...!L , n tl<1l::ir.-y 1)(1l~l.i.(' oi: t:,rnnvil/e r~{H111l:·y-,"N.9r;b1-."r;;tf•nl.rii;1, dQ hCrr .. ~f;·y-ct:rtity tlinl: -·-··· y(.:.:· ___ /{_,_f,,!l..J....fil1...t'-'-~-~L----·-·,---.-Ycr~;onn.LI.".' c,;mr~ l)r~l'r.,1·e mt'. l:hi_.<; d;•y/.:.1.ti:·. acl:u0wlc}y~~cd r\1:rt he ·1.s ~cct·e.l:nry ol· ClllC() J.n·r·::1::ir·:-: Tnc., :1 cnt·por-::1tion, Uhl: tll;i.t by ,.1utlwrity dul.y ?,lvcn, :ind ~1!: the :1ct: ui: l:\tc 1.:t)rpcwntion, tl1c l:orcgoi.n[,~ i.n:;tr.urm:nl" wns i;i.irnc:l "i.11 i.t":; n:;,,1l: ily it:-; 'i:'rc::; i.<l en t, .•:; o..-d t~d w i. t:h i.!: ;; c orf~tit·n tc~ 1:1~:i I , :.wc1 :1 t·: I (i:: Ir., I 1i,,. lti.m::~~u: :1:: "i,t::; ;il!Ct't.d:nry. ,' ·,-:t.-,,~ ·-"\J;, ;·_:c:"bn1111 i:;:~ ion . . ' . . .. < ,:, '! ')M rd' 1 " ·: .i 'I ' • • )'l'JX tB5 l/,1,1 517 Hllin'11 C/\lH)LlN/\, ,:.U1l\!V.LLLt•: C:UUNTY.) ,, , ) ( ··1 / .. 1, .➔ .. P\.1.s....i!.....( .. 1• .r __ ,__.,./t::-···'( __ / __ -r:-__ , 11 wo1·nry pulil.ic of (:rnnv1.ll.r! Coupty, North C:iroLLna, do ncrPby c~rt·iJy l:h:,t: on l:i1i.fl d:iy pcrsonnll.y camP. he.foi.-e 111c C:cori(c ~;. D:inl.L~I., J. I(. -11.t'ynn, .Jr., Lou\.s R. 11utchi.nson, ,John!~. l•i.ttnr.d, Jr., ;1nt1 .J. r:. N<il.m:;, ::i.J.\ll(\rs 11t\L1. 1;c11lcn, nl: 1:l1c l'.01·e;<;Pi.nr~ i11:;tri1- 111cnt, ,'lml duly acknoHLctlged thrit 1:hcy r-.xccutc.d tt1c J1:1111c {pr \:he pu1·po:>CH l:herc i.n expn'.ascd. . 'I '1-)i.l:ll{~H!l my ll:i11d one\ iwt:nri.nL ,'H!nl., t·hi1-: the .. :.?!. (1:i•J' or ___ t ___ ,_ .: .. _1 .... , _L·. ________ ----··· -___ , L 9GJ • GHANV JI,J,P. COUNTY Tim fo1·eg:ol11g ccrt1.ficat.e$of ... /4t:::.L. ,.; .... .l?.".VU.c.~-x..;:-t::.,,· u notnry public or .~2',&'..,.,-,:<,~r:;.:::<..·:~~:....... c,::· : v, :• Llr1·;tr1d h:V h_,., ._.. .. notarial seab,~a<lJu,1,:od tfl 1,c cotT(H:t, Ind,-~ :•·:·1 :1,d .'.11:t.:u1-C:1ni: to Law. Let tho lm;LI'UJl>.'llL wl.th tlie cof'l;lficuLo~l.Ju 1·,c:L:,Le1,.-d. W 1 tnens my hantl, th1 a 9.r...6. ... (l.':!Y or , d~i.~,?.>e.:6'.~·.(L.. . ... 195 .. 1.~ ..... ... Ck~~ ,~----~---1,,_.;:,...-__: .. ____ /~; . -.&.>;.✓• •• ~~ ,.«.,,. .. ~.c~~---· 'I ,,.... Clerk ~uperlor Couet . .,,_ .,,,c:.·•-'·' ;.,,.:. ;' II • W-'ITl(INII •OMUNl;I .. ON "TIO .. Nl:V!J AT W,,W c8JK 165 l'Ml 510 NUlrfH Cf\ROLIN/\ Gll.~NV ILLE COUNTY This deed 1n;1de and entered into this the ::.'i/~il day of /\11riust, 19(J_i;, by and between George E. lJa1del and wife, Sue W. l)~nicl; Jor~ I<. OryHn, Jr. and wifP., JoAnn H. Bryan; John lt. Nelms ;_ind wir,i, Mary n:uth C. Nelms; Louis R. Hutchinson and wffc, Mary F. llut.chln~-.on; and John E. Pitt;ird, Jr, and wife, lleJJlq 11. PltU1rd, pRrties of' the f~rst part,.aml SLeinft-:lJ Mills, Inc., of Oxf"ord, North Carolina, party of the sr::cond part; ~I I T N l~ S _ S E T l J : That t11r~ said parties of ttic first part, for 8.Tld i11 _r~Oll~ldin::it.i0ll t)( lh8 payment to them hy the !3Bid party of the :>ec,rncl p.nrt of the !a1111 of ten tloIJ.:irs, nnc! ottiec:r good :ind valnablc ,:.;011'.;id<:n1t.ion, to· tliEim in hand paid, the 1·eceipt of" which ls hercLy -exprefisly aclrnowledged, do herelJy !live, nrant, lmt"fFlit1, ~cl I nnd convey unto the snlrl party of the second p0rt, il:; cJfi:;inn :ind su<:cessor!> in office, n ·certnln tract. or pnrcel ol" lnnd lyi11~1 -'1nd belnfJ ~lt.unte In Oxford Township, Grnnvillc County, North Cnrollnri, :ind h1iing rn0re particular:ly described ns follows: Dei1lnninp nt an iron pin on the rwrthern '.dde of lndu~try Drive, and JO feet from the center line thereof', corner 1)f the land of" s. V_. Morton, Jr., and 1'un11in9 thence alonn the northcni and then 1~nstern rnnrgin:; of snid Industry Drive N. r,7° 2(11 1.•.1, l.iS?.13 fe8t; tllcnce a curved line lUL1 .. l1.6 f'cet in lennth :ind JrnvinfJ a radius of' '/'7.2 feet; thence N. 9° .?5 1 1,'I. ~!?_i-;,O fP.et, N. R0 JI' W. 99.0 friet and N, 1° 18 1 W. 2l1f1.l1 f"".!P.t to nn iron pin in tile eastern marnin of Industry Drive nnd .30 f'r:!et from the: center line thereof; thence S. IJ'/0 03 1 E, !169,1) f"ijet to a stake; thence S. 2° 00 1 E. 06.0 feet to ri stone in the l_ine of S. V. Morton, Jr,; thencri Blong Morton's line S. 2:~0 l1l1.1 w. (JJ;~.? feet to the point of benfnnlnsi, ,rnd cont;:'1[nlnri 11.21\ acres, more or lcr.s, according to m8.p of" Johnnli~ C, Currin, H.L.s., from his survey or April ;_~l, 19!JS, and being the same .land conveyed to Geornc E. Daniel nnd wiff:; et al, by /\nnle Mae 5. Davis and husband Luther H, Unvis, by deed dated .Jrrnuary JI, 196!.1., of record ln Boal{ l!,9, nt pape S/1.J, Granville County Renlstry. TO HAVE /\ND Tci HOLD the said tract or parcel of" land, with all of the pdvilenqs and appurtenancen t..t~ercunto belo11nt11n unto the said par~y of tile second part, its assigns and successors in office, in fee simple forever. And the said parties of the first part covenant and apree to and with the said party of' the second rart, thnt they are seized of" said tract or. parcel of land in fee, and have the • • • 165 l',l,,i 51.1 ri111tt t'.o convey the same In fei~ simple; U1~t t11e same ls free nnd clertr f'rorn any il.rld nl 1 encumbrances, nnd that they do hcrl':by vmr1·rtnt and will forever defend the title to· the same nnninst the l~wf'ul clal1ns arid demands of any an(! nil pcrso11s who111socver. IN TE.'.iTJM()NY WIIEHl~OF, the s0id parties of tlH:: first r1nrt, hnvc llen~nnlo 5'! t their hands and seals, thlc. the .dny nnd ycnr first. nbove wrltte11. (:,E/\L) (SEAL) HCHTH C!\HO\. INI\ (~fU\N\llLLE COUNTY / . ' ·/, . /;. (, _;.J...l,•~,' c;· /(..'/,:·r..r .... -1., c;t. Not;iry Pu./Jllc oI the county and •;tate 8.'l'oresaid, do hereby certify Urnt 011 till!.. dny rH:rsonrilly ;tppenrr•d hf~fore me, George[; Dan.lei ,rnu wife, Sue W. Dnnicl; Joe IL Uryan, Jr. and wife, Jol\nn l-1. nry,;111; .l{1h11 !~. Nelms nnd wire, Mc1ry Hut/1 C. 'Nelms; Louis H; lfutcllinson <HH! wu·,~, ,'11nry F:. llulchinson; and John E, Pitt,ird, Jr. rind wife, ilcllig I!. Pitlnrd, si[Jflf~rs and sealers of thf: fore9olnn nn.J hereto ~nnexcd d.<?ed and adrnowledged the due cxP.cutlon of the snmc f11r the · .·,,i •;,ntiriposr.J ther•1.dn set forth. : .-:--/1··\:. ::.:_/~fi·Vt-;,< '.'Ji tness my Imm\ nnrl notar'ia l seri I, tills the ::J.L (fay . ·,--.'_._':•',·_.:_·,,-·_·_;'.·.; 0 ·_{~:;{J.. 1 tf!:•··;.f}'U.gµ.S t, .t 9(,5. ·~ ~ <·_:.?Jtth; .. · .i . ' • .,,... /,,... \ t. ./· I ' .o:·:::1:;\:0f.'. $,Lcjf!t'~:;· 1 1 ~Ma~; P~b,, / 1 '~!:-.. < --"-"'"-'~-' ... ,.,.o,. ... r.~~ ,.H_,~:>:.: .. :~l:f·•c:.omm ls s 1 on expires: /,-"J f :,,,/1;: .,.- •H COLLUI( .~;..~~:c.,., ,;•,] { ,,j • c».-o .. o, NORlH CM10L1t•.",,: 1_65 I,1I,I 51_2 • NUH'l'l1 CAllnt,1/lA, GHANVI!,LE COUNTY ,.-? ,,.. ·;I' . . . 'l'lie for·o1;0 lnti certi.f lea tn of' .. _..a-;~c.L~ .... J,.~-, ... ,..:;.,~,~--..C:,c'✓.::'.:.-·,.~,,.•.:.'. ... ,, n noLIH'Y publ 1.c o.f.. .. ,,,.,,,'.:/~.;i_.,~:.',f. .. .::.',:,>. .. !.... .. Cciu• \·y, n tton\:t!ll \ly h.t .. '.,LI... ...... . notartal oua.l, ln adju,lr:od to bu corroot, In 1!1w 1.'n1·111 n11,l nt:twrtlln~ to law l,ot Urn lnstr111r.,'11t with tlw cor·tlt'lcato~bn n)1~t:Jtor1:J. . .196-..L: ...... • V . ,. V • • APPENDIX F SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS PLAN MP?;t\fl~◊N!JS: En1;i11,•cri11i: & £111·iro1im1•ntal Sol111ion.1· • • APPENDIX F SAMPLING AND ANAL YSlS PLAN REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION WORK PLAN CRISTEX FACILITY OXFORD, NORTH CAROLINA Prepared for: Leonhardt Environmental 3208 Twin Leaf Drive Raleigh, North Carolina 27613 Prepared by: Mid-Atlantic Associates, P.A. 409 Rogers View Court Raleigh, North Carolina 276 i 0 October 2002 MP?;~Jl;(,}NTJS: Enr,:ineering & Environm,,,,,nl ~--'- • TABLE OF CONTENTS F-1 SOIL SAMPLING ................................................................................... 1 F-2 F-1 .1 F-1 .2 F-1 . 3 F-1 .4 F-1.5 F-1 .6 General Soil Sampling Protocols .................................................. 1 Hand Auger Sample Collection .................................................... 2 Split Spoon Sample Collection ..................................................... 3 DPT Sample Collection ............................................................... 4 Compositing Samples ................................................................. 5 TVA Screening Protocols ............................................................ 5 GROUNDWATER SAMPLING 6 F-2.1 F-2.2 F-2.3 ·································································· Installation of Monitoring Wells ................................................... 6 Monitoring Well Sampling Procedure ............................................ 7 Sample Identification and Shipment ........................................... 1 2 F-3 SOIL GAS INVESTIGATION 12 13 ·································································· F-4 FIELD QUALITY ASSURANCE/QUALITY CONTROL ································· • F-5 LABORATORY QA/QC 14 • ····················································· ................... . F-6 DECONTAMINATION PROCEDURES 14 15 ····················································· F-7 FIELD NOTEBOOK ATTACHMENTS Attachment A Attachment B Attachment C Attachment D Attachment E ··············································································· Sampling Forms Analytical Methods and Parameters Order of Sample Collection, Sample Containers, Preservatives, and Sample Holding Times Well Schematic Laboratory QA/QC Procedures MP?;t\J'l~'}NTl~ £nginerrin11 & Enl'ironmental So/urions • • APPENDIX F SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS PLAN REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION WORKPLAN CRISTEX FACILITY OXFORD, NORTH CAROLINA The sampling procedures presented in this Sampling and Analysis Plan (SAP) will be used to characterize potentially contaminated media at the subject site. The procedures are structured to comply with the REC Implementation Guidance and/or the EPA Standard Operations Procedures (SOP) manual for environmental media sampling. F-1 SOIL SAMPLING F-1 .1 General Soil Samplina Protocols Soil samples will be collected using hand augers, split spoon samplers driven through hallow-stem augers, or by direct push technology (DPT). A representative portion of each sample will be placed into a plastic bag and scanned using a total vapor analyzer (TVA). The TVA is useful as a scanning device to detect the presence of volatile organic compounds, but is not relied upon to determine specific levels of contamination. Results from TVA scanning may be used in conjunction with field observations to select samples for laboratory analysis. Soil sampling procedures normally generate soil cuttings. All cuttings will be drummed, labeled, and temporarily stored on-site prior to disposal based upon analytical results from soil sampling. All sampling devices will be decontaminated according to those procedures described in Section F-6 of this SAP. All soil sample borings will be backfilled with bentonite or grout to land surface at completion. Nitrile gloves will be worn during all soil sampling and equipment decontamination procedures. Sampling equipment rinse blanks will be collected at the frequency outlined in Section F-4 of this SAP from equipment that contacts the soil samples. These blanks are collected by pouring distilled water over the sampling equipment and collecting the rinseate. Equipment rinse blank samples will be analyzed for site constituents of concern. Duplicate soii samples wiil be coilected to check field sampling methods and to verify repeatability of analytical results and procedures. One duplicate sample will be coilected for each 20 soii samples. The duplicate sample will be labeled such that it would not be recognizable as a duplicate sample by the laboratory . MP?;{\J}~◊NTJS: Engineering & Environmental Solutions • • • Sampling and Analysis Plan Remedial Investigation Workplan Cristex Facility Oxford, North Carolina F-1 .2 Hand Auger Sample Collection October 2002 Page F-2 Hand augers will be used to collect shallow soil samples In some areas of the site. The following procedure will be used to collect samples: • Attach a clean auger bucket to the auger and advance the boring to the proposed sample depth. • Attach a clean bucket to the auger and collect the sample. • Complete and inspect all sampling labels to insure proper sample identification. A sample label is included in Attachment A. • Begin the Chain of Custody Record. An example of a standard chain of custody form is included in Attachment A. • Remove the soil from the auger bucket and place it into sample bottles for grab sample collection or into a glass pan or stainless steel bowl for mixing using the quartering method described in F-1.5 when composite samples are required. • Retrieve the sample from the central portion of the auger bucket to minimize contamination caused by soil fall-in. • Fill the sample bottles in the order shown in Attachment C. Attachment B lists the analytes and preservatives which match the sample bottles. Bottles for collection of volatiles samples require a Teflon-covered septum top. After being filled, store the sample containers in an ice-filled cooler for transport. The samples must not be allowed to freeze. • Place a portion of the sample into an appropriate container for TVA screening. Refer to Section F-1 .6 for TVA Screening protocols. • If more than one depth interval will be sampled, continue to advance boring using original auger bucket. Upon reaching required sample depth, a clean auger bucket should be attached and new gloves donned prior to collecting the sample . MP?;~Jr~◊NTJS: Engineering & En1•ironmen1a/ Solutions • • • Sampling and Analysis Plan Remedial Investigation Workplan Cristex FacHity October 2002 Page F-3 Oxford, North Carolina F-1 .3 Split Spoon Sample Collection Soil samples may be collected using split spoon sampling devices in conjunction with hollow-stem augers. The sample collection procedure is as follows: • Advance decontaminated hollow-stem augers to the proposed sample depth. • Attach a clean split spoon sampler to drill rods and inserted through the auger stems to the bottom of the boring. • Drive the split spoon, using a drop hammer, into the soil allowing a soil core to enter the spoon. • Complete and inspect all labels to insure proper sample identification. A sample label is included in Attachment A. • Begin the Chain of Custody Record. An example of a standard chain of custody form is included in Attachment A. • Retrieve the split spoon to the surface and split apart to expose the soil core. • Remove upper portion of soil core and discard to minimize contamination from boring fall-in. • Scrape the exterior of the core using a clean stainless steel spatula or spoon. • • • • Place a central portion of the soil core into laboratory-supplied sample bottles. Fill the sample bottles in the order shown in Attachment C. Bottles used for collection of volatiles samples reouire a Teflon-covered septum top. After being filled, store the sample containers in an ice-filled cooler for transport. The samples must not be allowed to freeze. Place a portion of the sample into a plastic bag for TVA scan . Advance the haring to the next proposed sample depth . MP?;~li1~◊NTl9 Engineering & Enl'ironmen1a/ Solutions • • • Sampling and Analysis Plan Remedial Investigation Workplan Cristex Facility October 2002 Page F-4 Oxford, North Carolina • Don clean gloves prior to sampling the next interval. • Use a clean spoon or spatula for each sampling interval. F-1 .4 DPT Sample Collection Some soil samples may be collected using DPT. This collection method is performed as follows: • Advance the push rod into the soil to the desired sample depth. • Insert a clean plastic liner into the hollow push rod and advance rod. While the rod is being pushed, soil is forced up into the rod and enters the plastic liner. The rod is then retrieved and the plastic liner removed. • Split the liner using a cutting tool, exposing the soil core. • Complete and inspect all labels to insure proper sample identification. A sample label is included in Attachment A. • Begin the Chain of Custody Record. An example of a standard chain of custody form is included in Attachment A. • Scrape off the outer portion of the soil core with a clean stainless steel spoon or spatula and collect a representative portion of the center of the soil core. • Place a central portion of the soil core into laboratory-supplied sample bottles or a glass or stainless steel pan if compositing samples. • Fill the sample bottles in the order shown in Attachment B. Bottles used for collection of volatiles samples require a Teflon-covered septum top. Attachment. C lists the analytes and preservatives which match the sample bottles. After being filled. sample containers will be stored in an ice-filled cooler for transport. The samples must not be allowed to freeze. • • Place a portion of the sample into a plastic bag for TVA scan . Insert a clean plastic liner into a decontaminated push rod to continue the boring . MP?s-{\fl~◊NTJ~ Engineering & Enl'ironmental Solutions • • • Sampling and Analysis Plan Remedial Investigation Workplan Cristex Facility Oxford, North Carolina • Advance the boring to the next proposed sample depth. • Don clean gloves prior to sampling the next interval. • Use a clean spoon or spatula for each sampling interval. F-1 . 5 Comoositino Sam oles October 2002 Page F-5 Some of the soil samples taken at the site will be composited into one sample before being submitted to the laboratory for analysis. Samples for volatile analysis will not be composited. Only grab samples will be analyzed for volatile constituents. The procedure for compositing samples is as follows: • Place soil from all locations to be composited into a clean glass or stainless steel mixing pan. • Wear a new pair of clean, protective, non-reactive gloves during mixing . • Divide the soil in the pan into four quarters. Thoroughly mix each quarter individually. • Mix two quarters together to form two halves. Thoroughly mix each half. • Combine all soil and mix thoroughly. • Repeat until material is adequately mixed. F-1 . 6 TVA Screening Protocols • Use a clean spoon to split the soil sample into two separate containers, one of which will be used for TVA screening and the other of which will be used as a laboratory sample, if necessary. Place the sample container for potential laboratory analysis into an ice-filled cooler and keep chilled in the event that it is selected for analysis. Leave approximately two inches of headspace in the container to be TVA screened and seal tightly. Place the sample container for TVA screening aside to allow for volatilization of organic compounds . MP?;~\rl~l}NTJS: £111:ineerin~ & Environmental Solutions • • \ Sampling and Analysis Plan Remedial Investigation Workplan Cristex Facility Oxford, North Carolina October 2002 Page F-6 • After approximately 15 minutes, insert the TVA sampler probe into the container for TVA screening and record the reading in the field notebook. F-2 GROUNDWATER SAMPLING Groundwater samples will be collected from permanent monitoring wells. Clean, protective/non-reactive gloves will be donned prior to beginning sampling and will be worn during the groundwater sampling procedures. F-2.1 Installation of Monitoring Wells Permanent wells will be installed in hollow-stem auger and air hammer drilling techniques as follows: • Advance augers or drill stem equipment to the proposed monitoring depth . • Install a two-inch diameter PVC well screen and PVC casing through the augers from the bottom of the boring to above land surface. • Pour or tremie sand through the augers such that a continuous sand pack from the bottom of the boring to two feet above the top of the screen is achieved. Augers should be retrieved but not rotated while sand is being introduced into borehole. • Pour or tremie bentonite pellets, sufficient to provide a two-foot seal, through the augers while they are being retrieved (not rotated). Allow the bentonite to hydrate for a minimum of eight hours before adding grout to well. • Pour or trernie a cement-bentonite grout mixture to land surface. • PVC casing will be finished above land surface and will be equipped with a lockable waterproof cap. • Install a concrete surface pad around each well to prevent surface water entering the borehole. MP?;¾J7~~NTJS: Enginl"rrin<> .t-,:_ .. · • • • Sampling and Analysis Plan Remedial Investigation Workplan Cristex Facility Oxford, North Carolina October 2002 Page F-7 • Concrete or metal pylons will be constructed around each permanent well as necessary to prevent damage from vehicular traffic, • Complete a well construction schematic, provided as Attachment D. • Wells will not be developed prior to 24 hours after installation. Wells wiil be developed using a clean bailer. Purge water from well development will be drummed and stored on-site pending groundwater sample analytical results. F-2.2 Monitoring Well Samoling Procedure Monitoring wells will be sampled according to the following procedure: a) Water Level Measurement • • Identify the well and record the location on the Groundwater Sampling Log. See Attachment A for a copy of the Groundwater Sampling Log . Put on a new pair of protective/nonreactive gloves at each well. Wear protective/nonreactive gloves throughout the water level monitoring procedure. • Obtain static water level measurements from all wells prior to beginning the well purging procedure. Well caps will be opened and the water level in the well will be allowed to equilibrate with atmospheric pressure prior to obtaining the water level measurement. • Clean the electric well depth probe by washing it with deionized or distilled water rinse. Use a probe accurate to 0.01 feet. • Measure the depth to water below the measuring point (top of PVC casing). Record this information in the Groundwater Sampling Log, • Water level measurements will proceed from the least to the most contaminated wells, based on the most recent historical analytical data. • The water level probe and cable will be decontaminated between each well as follows: spray with phosphate-free soap solution, paper towel wipe, and rinse with distilled water . MP?s-~Jl~❖NTJS: Engineering & £n1•ironmtntul Suluiions • • Sampling and Analysis Plan Remedial Investigation Workplan Cristex Facility Oxford, North Carolina b) Groundwater Sample Collection (Bailer) October 2002 Page F-8 • Sample wells in order from the least contaminated well to the most contaminated well, based on the most recent historical analytical data to minimize the potential for cross-contamination. • Compute the volume of water in the well using the well depth and the depth to water reading. Record this volume on the Groundwater Sampling Log. • Put on a new pair of protective/nonreactive gloves Wear protective/nonreactive gloves throughout sampling procedure. at each new well. the groundwater • Remove decontaminated bailer from protective wrapping. A different bailer will be used for each well. There will be no field cleaning of bailers . • Attach a new polypropylene rope to the bailer . • Begin bailing the well from the top of the water column, making certain to keep the sampling equipment (e.g. polypropylene rope) from coming into contact with potentially contaminated surfaces. The purpose of bailing from the top of the water is to remove as much of the standing water in the well casing as possible. • Record the physical appearance (color, odor, etc.) of the groundwater on the Groundwater Sampling Log after one well volume of water has been retrieved. Measure and record pH, conductivity, and temperature of the groundwater after each well volume of water is purged. • Continue bailing throughout the water column. Bailed groundwater should be poured from the bailer into a graduated. pail to measure the quantity of purged water. Continue purging until three well volumes have been purged or the well is evacuated to dryness. Record this information on the Groundwater Sampling Log. • Drum and temporarily store purge water on site pending receipt of groundwater sample analytical results. M!I?;~J~◊NTJ<; Engir11•rring & Environmental Sulutions • • Sampling and Analysis Plan Remedial Investigation Workplan Cristex Facility October 2002 Page F-9 Oxford, North Carolina • Prepare for sampling by inspecting all labels to insure proper sample identification. A sample label is included in Attachment A. • Begin the Chain of Custody Record. An example of a standard chain of custody form is included in Attachment A. • Collect samples as soon as technically feasible and within 24 hours of the purging procedure. • Gently lower a bailer into the well, in an effort to minimize degassing of the sample. Allow bailer to fill and then slowly retrieve. • Fill the sample bottles in the order shown in Attachment C. Attachment D lists the analytes and preservatives which match the sample bottles. After being filled, store the sample containers in an ice-filled cooler for transport. The samples must not be allowed to freeze. • Fill the sample containers with groundwater from the bailer, then securely cap it. Bottles used to collect samples for volatile analysis require a Teflon-covered septum top. Turn the vial upside down and check for air bubbles. If properly filled, there should be no air bubbles. Preservatives are to be added to sample bottles at the laboratory prior to arrival on site. • Bottles used to collect samples for metals analysis requires preservative. The preservative is to be added by the laboratory to the containers prior to arrival at the site. The addition of preservative is performed to adjust the sample pH to less than 2. • Duplicate water samples (in accordance with Section F-4) will be submitted to the laboratory. The duplicate samples will be identified as "Duplicate Sample for Matrix Spike" on the sample tag and chain of custody. • After being filled, sample containers will be stored at 4°C in the cooler for transport. The samples must not be allowed to freeze. • Replace the well cap. Lock the well protection assembly before leaving the well location. MP?~~JH~NTJ<; Engineerintr & Enl'ironmenrnl Solutions • • Sampling and Analysis Plan Remedial Investigation Workplan Cristex Facility October 2002 Page F-10 Oxford, North Carolina • Place the polypropylene rope, gloves, plastic sheeting, and other trash in a suitable trash receptacle for proper disposal after sampling. c) Groundwater Sample Collection (Pump) • Using the well depth and the depth to water reading, compute the volume of water in the well, and record this volume on the Groundwater Sampling Log. • Put on a new pair of protective/nonreactive gloves at each well. Wear protective/nonreactive gloves throughout the groundwater sampling procedure. • Prepare the pump for operation. A new piece of polyethylene tubing will be used for each well and not used to purge any other well. The pump will be used to purge only. Samples will be collected with a bailer. • Lower the pump intake into the water column and pump the groundwater into a graduated pail while monitoring the water level in the well. Periodically lower the pump intake level so that it remains approximately two to three feet below the top of the water column. Make certain sampling equipment does not contact potentially contaminated surfaces. • After approximately one well volume of water has been purged, record the physical appearance (color, odor, etc.) of the groundwater on_ the Groundwater Sampling Log. Also, measure and record the· field parameters (pH, conductivity, temperature) of the groundwater. Field parameters are to be measured and recorded after each well volume of water is purged. • Continue purging until three well volumes have been removed or the well is evacuated to dryness. Record this information on the Groundwater Sampling Log. Remove pump from we!I. • Purge water will be drummed and temporarily stored on site before disposal pending receipt of groundwater sample analytical results. • Remove bailer from protective wrapping. A different bailer will be used for each well. There will be no field cleaning of bailers. Attach the polypropylene rope to the bailer. MP?;~Jl~◊NTJ~ En.~ineering & En1·ironme111a/ Solurions • Sampling and Analysis Plan Remedial Investigation Workplan Cristex Facility Oxford, North Carolina October 2002 Page F-71 • Having purged the required amount of groundwater, prepare for sampling. Inspect all labels to insure proper sample identification. A sample label is included in Attachment A. • Begin the Chain of Custody Record. An example of a standard chain of custody form is included in Attachment A. • Samples will be collected as soon as technically feasible and within 24 hours of the purging procedure. • To collect groundwater samples, lower the bailer into the well slowly, in an effort to minimize degassing of the sample. • Fill the sample bottles in the order shown in Attachment B. Attachment C lists the analytes and preservatives which match the sample bottles. After being filled, sample containers will be stored at 4°C in the cooler for transport. The samples must not be allowed to freeze. • Bottles used to collect samples for volatile analysis require a Teflon- covered septum top. Preservative is added by the laboratory to the bottles prior to arrival at the site. Fill the bottle with groundwater from the bailer, then securely cap it. Turn the bottle upside down and check for air bubbles. If properly filled, there should be no air bubbles. • Bottles used to collect samples for metals analysis requires preservative. Preservative is to be added by the laboratory to the bottles before the bottles arrive at the site. The addition of preservative is performed to adjust the sample pH to less than 2. • Duplicate water samples will be submitted to the laboratory. The duplicate samples will be identified as "Duplicate Sample for Matrix Spike" on the sample tag and Chain-of-Custody. • After being filled, sample containers will be stored at 4°C in the cooler for transport. The samples must not be allowed to freeze. • Replace the well cap. Lock the. well protection assembly before leaving the well location. MP?s-{\Jr~◊NTJ~ Engineerini: & En\'ironmenl<JI Solutions • • • Sampling and Analysis Plan Remedial Investigation Workplan Cristex Facility Oxford, North Carolina October 2002 Page F-12 • Place the polypropylene rope, gloves, and other trash in a suitable trash receptacle. F-2.3 Sample Identification and Shioment Sample labels will be completed with an indelible marker. Information on the container label will be as follows: place of collection, sample identification number, date and time of sample collection, parameters requested, type of preservative, and name of sample collector. An example of a sample label is included in Attachment A. Samples will be transported from the site to the laboratory in coolers via hand or overnight delivery. A Chain of Custody form will be placed in a plastic bag and taped to the inside of the cooler lid. The cooler lid will be closed and a custody seal placed on the cooler. The lid will be securely taped shut. F-3 SOIL GAS INVESTIGATION Soil gas data will be collected using the following procedure. The location of the samplers will be dependent upon site walk over results to identify potential areas that warrant investigation. • A clean pair of protective, non-reactive nitrile gloves will be donned at each location prior to sampling. • Drill a one-inch to 1 ½-inch diameter hole through the surfacing to the soils. Insert a sanitized metal pipe into the hole. Make a hole into the underlying soils by hammering a ¾-inch diameter metal sake four inches in the soil. • Remove the shipping cap from the Collector vial containing the hydrophobic adsorbent cartridges and replace it with a sampling cap. Extend the retrieval wire, which comes wrapped around the Collector. Insert the Collector into the hole, sampling cap down. Cover the collector with soil • Retrie•1e Collector three days after insertion. • Remove the Collector from the hole and replace the samoling cap with the solid shipping cap. • Complete and inspect all labels to insure proper sample identification. A sample label is included in Attachment A . MP?;~:r~L}NTl<; £nginf.'ering & En\'ironmental Solutions • 0 Sampling and Analysis Plan Remedial Investigation Workplan Cristex Facility Oxford, North Carolina October 2002 Page F-13 • Begin the Chain of Custody Record. An example of a standard chain of custody form is included in Attachment A. • Return the Collector to the Kit. • Ship the Collector to the laboratory for analysis for the presence of chlorinated volatile organic compounds. F-4 FIELD QUALITY ASSURANCE/QUALITY CONTROL This SAP is designed to meet the EPA SOP guidelines for data quality objectives (DQO). This Section describes the field quality assurance/quality control (QA/QC) procedures designed to meet project OQOs. Field QA/QC objectives will be accomplished through the collection and analysis of field (equipment) blanks, trip blanks, etc. Field QA/QC procedures will be as follows: • One trip blank will be submitted for each shipment of sample coolers from the site. The trip blank will be shipped from the laboratory with and be handled as other sample bottles. Soil or groundwater trip blanks will be submitted depending on the media being sampled. • One equipment rinse blank sample will be collected per day. Each type of sampling equipment that contacts samples will be rinsed with distilled water and the rinseate collected in laboratory provided bottles. Blanks will be analyzed for the entire suite of analytes that environmental media samples are analyzed for. • Sample collection activities should proceed progressively from the least suspected contaminated area to the most suspected contaminated area, where feasible. • Duplicate samples will be collected to determine whether investigation samples are representative of the area sampled. One duplicate sample per medium per container type per sampling day will be collected and submitted for each field day during 'Nhich at least eight samples are collected for analysis. If it is projected that eight samples will not be collected during any one day, then a duplicate sample will be collected from each AOC. MP?;~Jl~~NTJ<; Engi111•ering & E1tl'irunmen1al 5ofurions • • Sampling and Analvsis Plan Remedial Investigation Workplan Cristex Facilitv Oxford, North Carolina October 2002 Page F-14 • Split samples may be collected to determine whether sample handling techniques and laboratory results are consistent. • Samples suspected of containing high concentrations of contaminants will be placed in separate plastic bags before being placed into shipment coolers. F-5 LABORATORY QA/QC Paradigm Analytical Laboratories, Inc. will provide laboratory analytical services for samples collected at this site. Laboratory QA/QC procedures are provided in Attachment E. Soil gas samplers will be analyzed by Beacon Environmental. F-6 DECONTAMINATION PROCEDURES Clean, decontaminated, pre-preserved sample bottles will be supplied by the laboratory. Groundwater sample baiiers will be provided pre-cleaned by the supplier. Only disposable bailers will be used. There will be no field-cleaning of baiiers. Field equipment will be disassembled as much as practical, prior to cleaning. Sampling equipment will be cleaned using the following procedures: • Teflon, plastic, and glass sampling equipment will be cleaned using the following procedure: -hot water wash with phosphate free soap and tap water; -hot water rinse with tap water -rinse with 10% nitric acid solution -distilled water rinse -isopropyl alcohol rinse -air dry -wrap in aluminum foil -seal in plastic 0 Stainless stee! equipment will be cleaned using the following procedure: -hot water wash with phosphate free soap and tap water; -hot water rinse with tap water -distilled water rinse isopropyi alcohol rinse MP?;{\J,~◊NTlS: £ngineerini: & £nvironmenial Solutions • 0 • Sampling and Analysis Plan Remedial Investigation Workplan Cristex Facility Oxford, North Carolina -air dry -wrap in aluminum foil -seal in plastic October 2002 Page F-75 A decontamination pad will be established at the site in order to decontaminate larger sampling equipment such as hollow-stem augers, DPT equipment, etc. The pad will be constructed in an area believed to be free of surface contamination. The pad will be lined with plastic and bermed to prevent run-off. Rinseate/waste water generated at the pad will be drummed, sampled, and temporarily stored on-site pending disposal based on analytical results. Augers, drill stems, rods, tools, and portions of the drill rig that are over the borehole will be cleaned using the following procedure: • Clean equipment with tap water and soap. Steam clean as necessary. • Rinse thoroughly with tap water. F-7 FIELD NOTEBOOK A field notebook will be used to record all pertinent information relating to site investigation activities, including the following: • • • • • name(s) of sampling personnel date of sampling environmental conditions unusual site conditions encountered documentation of the items below: equipment used for water level measurement; depth to water below the measuring point; depth to bottom of well; water level elevation; well purge time and date; equipment used for purging; amount of water removed at purging; sample collection time and date; equipment used for sample collection; field parameters; and type and number of sample containers filled at each well. MP?;~J7~◊NTJ~ Engineering & Enl'ironmenta/ Solutions • ATTACHMENT A SAMPLING FORMS MP?;{'.J};t}NTJS: Engir1<•eri11g & Endrunmenta/ Solutions 0 • • - EA~PICHFR ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY DEPT. 200 8..l. TlJNNa.1. BLVD. MIAMI. Cl( 743:!.4 1~1-7425 SAMPLE .. LABELS FOG! E~PICHER Specially Cleaned Sample Container ENV1RONMENTA1. SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY DEPT. :008.1. T1J?tNEU.BlVO_MW.Q.OK7~354 1.aoo-331•74~ DATE: SAMPLING sme I llME: SAMPLE 1YPE: Lot#: ICOL.1.ECTED BY: 0 Grab O Comoosite 0 Other TESTS REQUIRED: 0 \"~'~'®' ---·----- --.. -_ Specially Cleaned S-WPUNGsme """" ™"' - ~.1 Sample Container LOT NO.: □Grab □Composite """"""""" DATE: rME: ICOL1.ECTED BY: . -.. -- □Other PRESERVATIVE ·\llADIGM A' YTICAL LAIIOltATOnms, INC. i27 Northchase Parkway SE, Wilmington, NC 28405 l1one: (910)-350-1903 FAX: (9 I 0)-350-1557 Chain-of Custody Record & Analytical Request lient: Project ID: ______ _ Date: ________ _ ddress: __ ~-------P.O. Numher: _______ _ 1\irnaroimd: ________ _ ddress: _________ _ Contact: ________ . Joh Number: ________ _ COC/1 146. Page ___ of __ _ Report To: __________ _ uote #: ---,,-,;-r:-,,,-.-,-£c:::_"'_"'_.,._-:c_cc_...,_-:c_-::r--=.--,-..-::=======.--c;;-==================7T'============:;;,:;:,;r Phone: _______ _ !~}r,f~§frvWl,rlt\,4 Invoice To:----------~ ' l . ' .. :!\ --+--+----+---+---+---I-------------------------1 • • ATTACHMENT B ANALYTICAL METHODS AND PARAMETERS MP?;~JH~NTJS: Eni:ineering & En1•ironmen1a/ Sululions • • • Volatile Organic Compounds Method 8260B Semi-Volatile Organic Compounds Method 8270C Pesticides Method 8081 PCB's Method 8082 Metals SW-846 Methods Notes: 1 . Standard Method 3030C "Preliminary Treatment for Acid-Extractable Metals," Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, latest edition, may be used in metals analyses of water samples. Filtration of groundwater and surface water samples before acid digestion is not permitted. 2. The.laboratory will achieve sample quantitation limits less than or equal to the Subchapter 2L groundwater standards, or must state in the case narrative that the sample quantitation limits are the lowest that can be achieved using EPA- approved methods . Oac-30-88 03: 59pm F ran-PARAO I GIi LASS i I 03501557 T-086 P.02/15 F-232 R=ults for Vol:ztlles by GCMS 821JQB Client Sample ID: Date Analyzed: 3/26/98 Client Project ID: Analyzea By:. LAW Lab Sample ID: Dale Collected: 3/13/98 Lab Project JD: Date Received: 3117/98 Matrix: Soil %Soli~: 100.0 Dilution: 1 Compound Quanllta:lion Result Limit (ug/KC3l (Ug/KGj Acetone so eaL Acr.>lein 100 BQL Acrylonitriie iOO BQL Benzene 5 SOL Bromcbenzene 5 BQL Srcmcchloromethane 5 BQL Brcmcdichloromethane 5 BQL Sromofcrm 5 SOL Brome methane 5 BOJ. 2-Butanono 25 BQL n-Butylbenzene 5 BQL sec,.9utylbenzene 5 BQL tert-Sutylbenzene 5 BQL Cart>on disulfide 5 SQL Cart,on tetrachloride· 5 BQL Chlorcbenzene 5 BQL Chloroetnane 5 BQL 2-chloroethyl vinyl ether 5 SOL Chloroform 5 SOL Chloromethane 5 BQL • 2-Chlcrotcluene 5 SOL 4-Chlorotaluene 5 BOL Di bro mo chi orom ethane 5 BQL 1, 2-Dibromo-3-clllorcpropane s SOL Dibromomethane 5 SQL 1,2-0ibromoethane (EDS) 5 BQL 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 5 BQL 1 ,3-Dichlcrobenzene 5 SOL 1.4-Olchlorobenzene 5 SOL !rnns-1, 4-Dichloro-2-butene 5 BQL 1, 1-Oichlcroethane 5 BOL 1, 1-Oichloroethene 5 SQL 1,2-Dichlorcethane 5 SOL cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 5 SOL trans-1 ,2-<!ichlorcelllene 5 SOL 1,2--0ichloropropane 5 BQL 1,3-Dlch/oropropane 5 BQL 2,2-Dichloropropane 5 SOL 1, 1-Dlchloropropene 5 BQL. cis-1,:3--Dichlcropropene 5 SOL trans-1,J-Oichlcropropene 5 SOL. Dichlorodiffuoromethane 5 SOL Diisopropyt ether (DIP:) 5 8OL Elhyll>enzene 5 BCL:. Hexachlorobutsdiene 5 SOL. 2-H=ncne 5 SQL lcdomethane 5 BQL lsopropylbenzene 5 BQL. Reviewed by;· '?!:;' Flags: BOL = Belew Quantltation Limit Dec-SO-Bi OS:59Pm Fron-PARAOIG" LABS 910350155i T-086 P.03/15 F-ZS2 Client Sample ID: Client Proj..ct ID: Lab Sample ID: Lab Project ID: Matrix: Soll Compound 4-!sopropyltoluena Methylene chloride 4-Methyl-2-pent.:none Melhyl-tert-butyl ether (MTBE) Naphthalene n-Propyl benzene Styrene 1, 1, l ,2-Telrachloroethane 1, 1,2.2-Telrachloroethane Tetrachloroethene Toluene 1,2,3-Trichlorobonzene 1,2,4-Trichlorabenzene Trichloroethene 1, 1, 1-Trichloroethane 1. 1,2-Trichloroethane Trichlorofluoromethane 1 ,2,3-Trictiloropropane ~ ,2,4-Triroothylbenzena 1 ,:'!,5-Trimethylbenzene Vinyl chloride m-,p-Xylene a-Xylene Sum,gate Spike Recoveries Compound BrcmaOuorobenzene 1,2-Dich loroethane-d4 Toluene-dB Comments: Result, for Volatlle:s byGCMS82WB %Solids: , ao.o auantltatlon Limit (ug/KG) 5 20 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 10 5 Spike Added {ug/KG) 50 50 50 All results are corrected for dilution. .Flags:·. BQL = Below Quarrtitation Limit Date Analyzed; 3/26/98 Analyzed By:.LAW Date Collected: ·3113/98 Date ReceiWld: 3/17/98 Dilutloo: 1 Result (Ug/KGJ BQL BQL BQL SOL BQL BQL SOL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL 9QL 9QL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL 3urmgate Result %Rec (ug/KGJ 50 100 50 100 50 100 Reviewed by: :e+{ Pogo20f 2 Dec-30-99 04:00pm Fr011""PARADIGII LABS l10350155i T-OBi P.04/15 F-2!2 __ ... ___ ................... ~ .. --· ... ·-·-__ .., .......... -.-.--.1, -·-•· Rasults for SemivolatllaS byGCMS8270 • crrent Sample 10: ·example Date Collected: Example CUent Prcject ID: Example Date Received: Example Lab Sample ID: Example Dale Analyzed: Example Lab Prcject 10: .Example Dilution: 1 Matrix: Soil %Solids: 100.0 Compound Quantltation Result Umlt (ug/KG) (ug/KGl Acenaphlllene 310 BQL Acenaph!hylene 310 BQL Anthracene 310 BOL Benzo[a)an!hracene 310 BQL Benzo[a)pyrene 310 BOL · Benzo{b]fluoranthene 310 BQL Benzo{g,h,ijpeJYlene 310 BQL Benzo{!l:)fluoranthene 310 BQL Benzoic Acid 620 BQL Benzyl Alcohol 310 BQL Bis(2-chlcrcethoxy)methane 310 BQL Bis(2-chleroethyl)ether 310 BQL Bis(2-chlorcisopr0pyl)ether 310 BQL Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate 310 BQL 4-bromophenyl phenyl ether 310 BQL Butylbenzylphthalate 310 BQL -• 4-Chloroaniline 310 BQL 4-Chloro-3-methylphenol 310 BQL 2-Chlorcnaphthalena 310 BQL 2-Chlorophenol 310 BQL 4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether 310 SOL Chrysene 310 BQL Di-n-Butylphthalate. 310 BQL Oi-n-acty_lphthalate. 310 BQL Dibenzo(a,h]anthracene 310 BQL Dlbenzofuran 310 SOL 1,2-0iclllorobenzene 310 BQL 1.3-0ichlorcbenzene 310 BQL 1,4-0ichlorobenzena 310 BQL 3,3'-Dlchlembenzidine 620 BQL 2,4-0ichlorophenoi. 310 BQL Dlethylphthalate 310 BQL 2,4-Dimet!i}'.lphenol 310 BQL Dimethylphthalale. 310 BQL 4.6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol 1600 BQL 2.4-Dinitrcphenol 1600 BQL 2,4-Diniirotoluene 310 BQL 2.6-0lnitrotofuene' 310 BQL Fluoranthene. 310 BQL Fluorene, 310 BQL Hexachlorobenzene 310 BQL -· Helladllorobuladiene 310 BQL Hexachlorocydopentadiene · 620 BQL Hexachloroethane, 310 BQL lndeno(1';2;3,c,d)pynme, 310 BQL Page 1 af2 Ooc-30-39 04:00pm Fron-?ARAOI G~ LABS il035□1551 r-oa; P.05/15 ,-202 -------·----·-------.. --------------· --·-· Results fer Semivolatiles byGCMS8270 Client Sample ID: Example Date Collected: Example _ct cnent Project 10: Example Date Received: Example Lab Sample ID: Example Date Analyzed: Example Lab Project ID: Example Dilution: 1 Matrix: SoH ¼Solids: 100.0 Compound Quantilation Result Limit fug/KG) fug/KG) lsophorone 310 BQL 2-Methylnaphthalene 310 BQL 2-Methylphenol 310 BQL 4-Methylphenol 310 BQL N-Nltrosodi-n-propylam!1_1e 310 ·eaL -----·--N-Nitrosodiphenylamine 310 BQL Naphthalene 310 BOL 2-Nitroaniline 310 BQL 3-Nltroan iline 310 BQL 4-Nilroaniline 310 BQL N itrobenzene 310 BQL 2-Nitrophenol 310 BQL 4-Nitrophenol 1600 BQL Pentachlorophenol 1600 BQL Phenanthrene 310 BQL Ptlenol 310 BQL Pyrene 310 BQL ·• 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 310 BQL 2,4,5-Trichlorophenol 310 BQL 2.4.6-Trichlorophenol 310 BQL Surrogate Spike Recoveries Spike Spike Percent Added Result Recovered 2.4,6-Tribromophenol 100 89 89 2-Fluorobiphenyl 100 99 99 2-Ftuorophenot 100 89 89 4-Terphenyl-d14 100 110 110 Ni!robenzene-d5 100 100 100 Phenol-d6 100 101 101 Comments: Results are correGJed for ¾solids and diluUon where applicable. Analyzed By: JPW Flags: BQL = Below Ouantitat:iOn Limit J = Detected below the quantiialion limit. Reviewed By: \.-i __ Page2 af 2 D,c-l0-39 04:0Qpm Frao-PARADIG~ LASS Q10350155i T-086 P.06/15 f-232 -----............. ·--• --· ·-___ ................. -o,J ...... ·-- ResultS fOr Semivolatiles byGCMS8270 • Client Sample ID: Example Date Collected: 10127/99 Client Project ID: Example Date Received: 10/2B/99 Lab Sample ID: Example Date Analyzed: 11/3/99 Lab Project ID: Example Analyzed By: MRC Matrix: Water DIiution: 1 Quantitrtion Result Compound Limit (ug/L) (ug/L) Acenaphthene 10 BQL Acenaphthylene 10 BQL An!hracene 10 BQL Benzo[a)anthracene 10 BQL Benzo(aJ~rene 10 BQL Benzo[ll]fluoranth!!ne · 10 BQL Benzo{g,h;ijperylene 10 BQL Benzo(k]fluoranthene 10 BQL Benzoic Acid 20 BQL Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane 10 BOL Bis(2-chloroethyQether 10 BQL Bls(2-chloroisopropyl)elher 10 BCL Bis(2-ethylhexyQphthatate 10 BOL 4-bromophenyl phenyl -ether 10 SOL Bu!ylbenzylphthalate 10 SOL 4-Chloroaniline 10 BQL • 4-Chloro-3-methylphenol 10 BQL 2-Chloronaphthalene 10 BOL 2-Cnlorophenol 10 BQL 4-Chlorophenyl enenyl ether 10 BQL Chrysene 10 BCL Di-n-Butytphthalate 10 BQL Di-n-octylphthalate 10 BQL Dibenzo[a,hlanthracene 10 BQL Dibenzofuran 10 BCL 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 10 BCL 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 10 BQL 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 10 BQL 3,3'-Dichlorobenzldine 20 BQL 2.4-Dlchlorophenol 10 BQL Diethytphthalate 10 BQL 2,4-Dimethylphenol 10 SOL Dimethylpht11alate 10 SOL 4,S0Dinitro-2-methylphenol 50 BQL 2,4-Dinitrophenol 50 SQL. 2,4-Dinltrotoluene 10 BQL 2,6-Dinitrotoluene 10 BQL Fluoranthene 10 BQL Fluorene 10 BQL Hexachtorobenzene 10 BQL • Pago 1 cl 2 Ooc-;o-ag 04:00pm Fron-PARADIGM LABS • • Client Semple ID: Example Client Project ID: Example Lab Sample ID: Example Lab Project ID: Example Matrix: Water Compound Hexachlorobutadiene . Hexachlorocyclopentadiene Hexachloroethane lndeno(1,2,3-c,d)pyrene lsopnorone 2·Methylnaphthalene · 2-Methylphenol 4-Metllylphenol N-Nitrosodl-n-propylamine N-Nitrnsodiphenylamine Naphthalene 2-N"rtroaniline 3-Nitroaniline. 4-NitrOaniline Nltmbenzene 2-Nitrophenol 4-Nitrophenol Pentachlorophenol Phenanthrene Phenol Pyrene 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 2,4,5-Trichloro phenol 2,4,8-Trichlorophenol Surrogate Spike Recoveries 2-Fluorobiphenyl 2-Fluorophenol Nitrobenzene-d5 PhenoHi6 2,4,6-Tribromophenol 4-Terphenyl-d14 Comments: 9103501557 i-085 P. 07/1 S f-ZZ2 Results for semivolatiles byGCMs·e210 Quantitation Limit jug/L) 10 20 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 50 50 10 10 10 10 10 10 Spike Added 10 10 10 10 10 10 Date Collect!!d: 10127/99 Date Received: 10/28/99 Date Analyzed: 11/3199 Analyzed By: MRC Dilution: 1 Result (ug/LJ BQL BQL BQL BQL BOL BQL BOL BQL SOL BOL BOL BOL BQL BOL SOL BOL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL SOL BQL Spike Percent Result Recovenid 10 100 7.3 73 8.7 87 8.2 82 7.6 76 14.4 144 Results are corrected for %solids and dilution where appiicable. Flags: SOL= Below Ouantttatlon Limit. • Reviewed By:¥-- Pa!)e2of2 Dac-30-oQ 04:0lp• FrorPARADIC" LASS 8103501557 T-086 P.08/15 F-2:2 -·-------··-. -···---.. -·-• -------·--------, -·-· Results for Priority Pollutant Metals Client Sample ID: Example Analyzed By: Example Client Project ID: Example Date Collected: Example Lab Sample ID: Example Date Received: Example Lab Project ID: G229-1 Matrix: Soil Solids 100.00 Metals Result Quantitation Units Procedure Date Limit Analyzed Antimony BQL 6.0 MG/KG 60108 Arsenic BQL 1.00 MG/KG 60106 Beryllium BQL 1.00 MG/KG 60108 Cadmium BOL 1.00 MG/KG 60108 Chromium SOL 1.00 MG/KG 60108 Copper BQL 2.00 MG/KG 6010B Lead BQL □.500 MG/KG 6010B Mercury BQL 0.0200 MG/KG 7471 Nickel BQL 4.00 MG/KG 60106 Selenium BOL 1.00 MG/KG 6010B Silver BQL 1.00 MG/KG 60108 Thallium SOL 1.00 MG/KG 60108 Zinc BQL 2.00 MG/KG 60106 • Comments BQL "" Below Quantitation Limits • Reviewed Efy: ¥- Ooc·l0-98 04:0lpm Fron-PARADIG" LABS i103:0155i T-086 P.09/15 F-222 • • • -------·---··----------------------, -- Results for Priority Pollutant Metals Client Sample ID: Client Project ID: Lab Sample ID: Lab Project ID: Metals Antimony Arsenic Elerytllum Cadmium Chromium Copper Lead Mercury· Nickel Selenium Silver Thallium Zinc Comments Example Example Example G229-1 Result BQL BQL SOL BQL ElQL BOL BQL SOL BQL BQL BQL BCL BQL Quantitation Limit 6.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 0.500 0.0200 4.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 BOL = Below Quantitation Limits Units MG/L MG/L MG/L MG/L MG/L MGIL MG/L MG/L MG/L MG/L MG/L MG/L MG/L Analyzed By: Example Date Collected: Example Date Received: Example Matrix: water Procedure Date Analyzed 60108 60108 60108 60108 60108 60108 60108 7471 6010B 6010B 6010B 60108 6010B Reviewed By:¥-- Des·SD-99 04:Dlpm Fron-PARADIGM LABS 1103501557 T-086 P.10/15 F-232 _____ ..,. ___ -----.. ---··- • • • Client Sample ID: Example Client Project ID: Exompli, Lab Sample ID: Example Lab Project ID: Example Matrix: Weter Compound Acetone Ac1Dlein Acrylcnrtrile Benzene Srctncbenzene Srcmochtcromethane Sromodlchloromethane Bromofonm Bromomethane 2-Su!anono n-Sutylbenzene see.Butylbenzene tert-Sutylbenzene Carbon disulfide Cart>on tetrachloride Chlcrobenzene Chloroethane · 2-Chlorriethyl vinyl ·ether Chloroform Chloromethane 2-Chlorotoluene +chlorololuene Dlbrcmcchloromethane 1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropene Oibromomethane 1,2-0lbromcethane (EOB) 1,2-0ichlorobenzene 1,3-0ichtorobenzene 1, 4-0ichtoncbenzene lrans-1,4-0lchloro-2-buiene 1, 1-Dichloncethane 1, 1-0ichloroe!hene 1,2-0ich!oncethane cis-1,2-0ichloroethene trans-1,2-dlchlcroethene 1,2-Dlchloncpropane 1,3-Diohloropropane 2.2-Dichloropropane 1J-Dichtoncpropene cis-1,3-0iehloropropene trens-1,:HJichloropropene Olchtoncdlfluoromethane Diisoproµyl ether (DIPEj Ethylbenzene - Hexachlorobutadlene 2-Hexanone lodomethane lsopropylbenzene Flags:: BQL.= Below auantitation Limit Results for Vol atlle,i by GCIJS 82508 auantitatton Limit (ug/L) 25 100 10C 1 1 1 25 1 1 1 1 s , 1 1 5 1 1 1 1 5 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 5 1 1 1 5 Oeta Analyzed:. Example Analyzed By: Example Date Collected: Example Date Received: Example Dilution: 1 Result (ug/LJ BQL BQL BQL Bal. BQL BQL' BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BCL BQL SOL BQL SOL BQL ea:. BQL SOL SOL BQL SOL BQL SOL BOL BOL SOL BQL BCL SOL BQL SOL SOL BQL SOL BQL BQL SOL BOL BOL SOL SOL. BQL. SOL SOL BQL BQL Reviewed by: %::-1( Pao• I al 2 Dec·lO·iQ 04:0lp= F,o,,.PARADIG" LASS l103501~5i T-086 P.11/15 F-232 .......... --....... .._. ·-···----·---·----------------, • Client Sample /0: :Example Client Project 10: Example Lab Sample 10: .Example Lab Project 10: .. Example Matrix: wamr Compound 4-lsopropyltoluene . Methylene chloride 4-Methyl-2-pentanone Methyl-tert-.butyl ether (MTBE) Naohthalene n-Propyl benzene Styrene 1, 1, 1,2-Tetrachloroethane 1, 1,2,2-Tetrachl~roethane Tetrachloroethene Toluene 1;:2,3-Trichlorcberu:ene 1.2,4-Trichlorobenzene Trichloroethene 1, 1, 1-Trichloraethane 1, 1,2-Trichloroethane Trichlorofluoraritethane 1.2,3-Trichlorapropane 1,2.4-Trlme1hylbenzene 1,:3,5-Trimethylbenzene Vinyl chloride m-,p-Xylene o-Xylene Surrogate Spike Recoveries Compound Bromofluon:Jbenzene 1.2-Dichloroethane-d4 Toluene-dB Comments: AU results are corrected for dilution . Rags: BQL = Below Quantitation Limtt Rest1lls !Dr Volatiles· by GC:MS 8260B Quantita1ion Limit (ug/1.) 1 5 5 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 'I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 , Spike Added (ug/L) 10 10 10 Date Analyzed: Example Analyzed By: Example Date Collected: Example O•le Received: Example Dilution: ·1 surrogate Result (ugtL) 9.7 10,0 9,7 Result (ug/LJ BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL' BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL SQL BQL BQL SQL BQL BQL BQL SQL BQL BQL BQL %Rec 97 100 97 Reviewed by: !Ct•" P.zga2 d 2 o,,-,o-,e 04:QZpm Fran-PARADIGM LABS 8103501557 T-086 P. 14/15 F-2,2 -------·-· --·•--·---·-----------, -·-· .Resutts·for PCB& byEPA8082 • Client sample ID: Example Date Analyzed: 12/3/99 Client Project ID: Example Analyzed By: JF'W Lab Sample ID: Example Date Collected: 11/18/99 Lab Projed ID: Example Date Received: 11/19/99 Matrix: SOH %SOLIDS 100.a Dilution: 1.0 Compound Quantitation Result Umit tug/KG) (Ug/KGJ Arochtor-1016 310 BQL Arnchlor-1221 310 BQL Arochlor-1232 310 BCL Arnchlor-1242 310 BQL Arnchlor-1248 310 BQL Arochlor-1254 310 BQL Arochlor-1260 310 BQL Surrogate Spike Reeoveries. Spike Spike Percent Added Resutt Recovered TCMX 100 ·54 84 • Comments: BQL -= Below Quantltation Limit NA = Not applicable, surrogate diluted out . • Reviewed By:~ Oec-,0-39 04:0Zpm F,a ... PARAOls~ LABS 1103501557 T-OSE ?. 15/15 F-232 .&~.&.._.,., .. ru,~.a..&.&.'--'~a., 1.a-.--&'-':l.&"-'.&.11.~u, ...,.,._. Ruults fer PC:Bs byEPA8082 0 Client Sample 10: Semple Fann Cate AnalyZed: Cfient Prcject ID: Analyzed By: Lab Sample ID: Oa18 Collected: I.ab Prcject 10: Da1e Received: Matrix: Water Dilution: 1.0 Compound Quantltatlon Result Umlt (ug/L) (ug/1..J Arcchlor;1016 10 BQL ArochlOr-1221 10 BQL · Arachlor-12:32 10 ·BQL An,ahlcr-1242 10 BQL Arochlor-1248 10 BQL Arochloi-1254 10 BQL Arachlor-1260 10 BQL Surrogate Spika Recoveries . Spike Spika Percant Added Result Recovered TCMX 100 84 84 • Comments: BCL.= Below Quantitalion Limit • Reviewed By:¥- • • ATTACHMENT C ORDER OF SAMPLE COLLECTION, SAMPLE CONTAINERS, PRESERVATIVES, AND SAMPLE HOLDING TIMES MP?;t\Jr~◊NTJS: Engineering & £n1·ironmen1a/ Solutions • e SOIL SAMPLES Volatile Organics 4 oz glass with Teflon-lined caps ice to 4"C 14 days Semi-Volatile 4 oz glass Organics ice to 4°C 7 days 40 days Pesticides 4 oz glass ice to 4°C 7 days 40 days Hazardous Substance 4 oz glass ice to 4°C 6 months List Metals -~-- NOTES -Parameters are listed in order of collection. 1 -Holding time begins at time of sample collection. • WATER SAMPLES Volatile Organics Semi-Volatile Organics Hazardous Substance List Metals* PCBs 3-40 ml glass vials 1-liter glass 500 ml poly 1-liter glass e HCI preservative, ice to 4°C ice to 4°C HNOJ until sample has pH less than 2, ice to 4°C ice to 4°C NOTES -Parameters are listed in order of collection. * -Extraction using method 3030C 1 -Holding time begins at time of sample collection. 14 days 7 days 40 days 48 hours 180 days 7 days 40 days • • • ATTACHMENT D WELL SCHEMATIC MP?~~Jl~◊NTJ~ £1rgi11eeri11g & Enl'ironmental Solutio11J NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT -GROUNDWAlB\ SECTION P.O. BOX 27687 -RAI.EGH. NC 27611•7687 PHONE: 19191 733-3221 0 WELL CONSTRUCTION RECORD FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Quad. No. _______ _ Serial No. _____ _ laL ________ Long. ______ Pc Minor Basin _________________ _ Basin Cade _________________ _ Header Ent. GW•1 Ent. DRILLING CONTRACTOR, _____________ _ STATE WELL CONSTRUCTION PERMIT NUMBER: DRILLER REGISTRATION NUMBER ___________ _ 1. WELL LOCATION: (Show Sketch of the location below! Nearest Town: ________________________ _ (Road, Community, or Subdivision and Lot No.) 2. OWNER: ______________________ _ ADDRESS: _____________________ _ (Street or Route No.I City or Town State Zip Code 3. DATE DRILLED _______ USE OF WELL. _______ _ ' 4. TOTAL DEPTH _______ CUTTINGS COLLECTED 0Yes O No 5. DOES WELL REPLACE EXISTING WELL? 0 Yes O No 6. STATIC WATER LEVEL:, _______ FT.0 above TOP OF CASING 0 below TOP OF CASING IS ____ _ FT. ABOVE LAND SURFACE METHOD OF TEST _____ _ 7.Ao (gpml: _______ _ 8. WTER ZONES {depthl: ________________ _ 9. CHLORINATION: Type ____ _ Amount, __________ _ 10. CASING: Oepth From To From To From To 11. GROUT: Depth From To From To 12. SCREEN: Depth From To Fram To From To 13. GRAVEL PACK: Oeptn F<om ___ _ To From ___ _ To Wall Thickness Diameter or Weight/Ft. Ft. Ft. Ft. Ft. Fe; Diameter Ft. Ft. Ft. Materiai in. in. ,n. Si..:e Slot Size in. in. in. Material Method Material County: _______________ _ Death From To Drillina Log Formation Description lf additional space is needed. use back of form. LOCATION SKETCH (Show direction and distance lrom at least two State Roads, or other mac reference points.} REMARKS:---------------------------------------------- • I DO HEREBY CERTIFY. THAT THIS WELL.WAS CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH 15 NCAC 2C, WELL CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS;.AND THAT"A COPY.OF THIS:RECORD HAS'BEEN PROVIDED TO THE WELL OWNER. SIGNATURE.OF CONTRACTOR OR AGENT DATE Subrnt original to Dlvisioo ot Ernrironr'91t and Natural Ruoura1s TYPE 111 MONITORING WELL INSTALLATION RECORD JOB NAME _____________ JOB NUMBER ________ _ WELL NUMBER INSTALLATION DATE _______ _ LOCATION __________________________ _ GROUND SURFACE ELEVATION ______ REFERENCE POINT ELEVATION ___ _ SCREEN MATERIAL SCREEN DIAMETER _______ _ RISER MATERIAL SLOT SIZE _________ _ DRIUING TECHNIQUE RISER DIAMETER ________ _ BOREHOLE DIAMETER DRIWNG CONTRACTOR _____ _ FLUSH MOUNT WELL PROTECTOR LOCKABLE CAP DEPTH TO TOP OF BENTONITE SEAL ____ : ··.! .:c., DEPTH TO TOP OF ·. " j• .. ,,: .. LENGTH OF OUTER CASING LENGTH OF SOLID SECTION (INNER) GROUND SURFACE TOTAL DE?TH OF WELL GRANULAR MATERIAL ___ . ·.·' :.·· ,-~: ==f-.~-ll._ THREADED COUPLING .-.; ~GROUT ~BENTONITE @]GRANULAR . :: . ' SCREEN --+a"' BACKFILL LENGTH. OF SLOTTED SECTION STABILIZED WATER LEVEL __ FEET BEi..OW TOP OF INNER CASING MEASURED ON ·. t . LENGTH OF TAIL. CAP --if,i,-C:J;·. F_:IP_::E:..:. ===:. __ _JL MID-ATLANTIC ASSOCIATES;. P:A'. THE ENVIRONMENTAL SOllITIONS PEOPLE TYPE: Ill MONITORING WELL INSTALLATION RECORD FLUSH MOUNT WELL PROTECTOR LOCKABLE CAP DEPTH TO TOP OF BEmONITE SEAL _-__ _ DEPTH TO TOP OF GRANULAR MATERIAL RISER SCREEN ··', .,,,. ' ' ,•"•. .,, r DEPTI! FROM GROUND SURFACE TO TOP OF CASING (TDC) LENGTH OF SOLID SECTION '·:;:=· =:;...;,!--+-THREADED COUPLING LENGTH OF SLOTTED SECTION LENGTTJ OF TA!L [filljGROUT ~ BENTON/TE CAP---t-.__1:::_=_:i~-" F PIPE -- ,,., '.·I GRANULAR BACKFILJL MID=ATLANTIC ·xs s o c fA T E s, P. A. Engineering & Envirom11cntal Solutions ,• ,. • • • t • • TYPE 11 FLUSH MOUNT LANO SURFACE TOTAL DEPTI! OF WELJL FROM TDC STABILIZED WATER LEVEL __ FEET BELOW TOP OF CASING MEASURED ON DRAWN BY: DRAFT CHECK: ENG CHECK: DATE: JOB ND: CAD NO: nwr. Nn: 0 • • ATTACHMENT E LABORATORY QA/QC PROCEDURES MP?~¾J~l}NTJS: En/,/ineering & Enl'ironmentoi Solutions • • PARADIGM ANALYTICAL LABORATORY -LABORATORY QUALITY "MANAGEMENT PLAN Doc# PALQMPlOO Date: 01/01/99 Page9 of65 4.0 IMPORTANCE AND PURPOSE OF QUALITY CONTROL The purpose of this manual is to provid!: documentation of the srandard practi= eIII!'loyed at PAL to ensure the quality and reliability of data returned to our clients. There are two reasons for this con= for quality. First, data is the product of this laboratory, so it is in our best interest to produce a reliable product Second, importan1 decisions as well as demonstration of regulatory compliance are based on our results. Clients need ma'<llillllII assurance that these decisions have the suppon of high quality laboratory work. The primary focus of this rnarrual are data returned to our clients from production analytical methods. Non-routine analyses or modified methods =ive unique quality comrol measures in accord with client requirements and the technical aspects of the analytical work. P AL's continuous commitment to quality is a primary con=. QC issues are emphasized at eve,y level within the company organizational chart. To ensure continued company growth we must build on our reputation for top-rate data and for communication of QC problems that are sometimes encountered with real-world samples. Imponant decisions with major economic consequences regarding the environmental status of land and w.ner and the e:<pOSUre of personnel to environmental hazards are based on labora1ory genera!ed results. Clients need maximum assurance that these decisions have the suppon of high quality laboratory work and definitive. predictable, and well-reasoned reactions to real-time QC data 0 • • PARADIGM ANALYTICAL LABORATORY -LABORATORY QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN Doc# PALQMPIOO 5.1 Introduction Date: 01101/99 Page 10 of65 5.0 QUALITY ASSURANCE OBJECTIVES The objective of this Quality Management Plan (QMP) is to provide a framework to ensure that all analytical data which are reponed are ofknmrn quality. The minimum requirements of ao effective Quality Assurance program include: Sample Managi:m= sampling. sample Jl=-ariOIL chain-<Jf.<:ustody Analytical Methodologi~ documented analytical procedures, C3.hlmrtion, data handling Laboratory R=rds: measurement data. maintenance records, equipment manuals Quality Conrrol/Qua!ity Assessment: control charts, quality control samples Data Review. Validation and Reporting Performanc: and System Audits/Corrective Action Personnel Training All measuremems made in this program are rep,=tative of the matrix aod conditions being analyzed The data are generally calculated and reponed in mtits consistent with standard reporting conventions to enable comparability to e.nsting data standards, and/or regulatory action limits. Client requesrs for specific reporting requirements are honored whenever poss1ble. The specific procedures utilized by PAL in this program "ill be descnbed in subsequent sections of this QMP. All of these requirements help to establish the QA objectives. which are me:isured in terms of accuracy. precision, and completeness . • • • PARADIGM ANALYTICAL LABORATORY -LABORATORY QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN Doc# PALOMPIOO Date: 01/01/99 Page 11 of65 5.2 Quality Assurance Objectives for Accuracy Analytic:tl accuracy c:m be e:,qiressed :i.s the pe=nt =very oi an anaiyre which has been used to fortify an iffi'estigative sample (Matrix Spike [MS]) or a standard matrix such :i.s blank soil or ana!yte-free water (Laborarory Comrol Sample [LCS]) at a lmown con=tration prior to analysis, and is expressed by the following furmula: where: Accuracy = % Recovery = AT-Ao X 100 Af Ar= Total amount of analyte found in fortified sample A,,= Amount found in unfortified sample %= Amoum added to sample The fortified concentration is specified by laboratory quality comroi requirements, or may be cie'-=ined relative to background concemrations observed in the unfortified sample. In the latter =. the fortified co=tration should be sufficiently larger than the background concentration (2 to 5 times higher) to permit a reliable recovery c:llculation. The quality assurance objectives for organic and inorganic analyses are tailored to the analytic:!] technique used, and are discussed seµmuely below . 0 • • PARADIGM ANALYTICAL LABORATORY -LABORATORY QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN Doc# PALOMP100 Date: 01/01/99 Page 12of65 5.U Organic Analysis (GC and GOMS) For organic analysis, analytical accuracy is obtained from the surrogate =vet)' measured· in each sample and blank and/or from the analysis of samples or blanks which have be::n fortified "ith target =lyres. The Quality Assurance objectives for accuracy in determination of priority pollulall! organic analytes by EPA SW--846 or CFR 40 methodologies are summarized. in Table 5.2.2-1 for GC and GC/MS sunogares and in Table 5.2.2-2 through 5.2.2-5 for GC and GC/MS target :malytes from fortified samples. For GOMS methods, surrog:ne analytes in investigative samples Iba! full mnside the specified ranges require reanalysis to confirm matrix effects if the sample chromategram is free from interii:rence. For GC methods the surrog:ne =very values are advisory for investigative samples. For both GC and GC/MS methods, MS/MSD target compound =very outliers require a LCS with a=ptable =very to demonstrate matrix effects. Othetwise, corrective action is required or the analyte mnst be flag.,oed in the repon. A=Iracy objectives for other analyses are defined on a case-by-c:ise basis through the use of cailbration or historical =very trends . • • PARADIGM ANALYTICAL LABORATORY -LABORATORY QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN Doc#PALOMPIOO Date: 01101/99 P:lge 22 of 65 5.3 Quality Assurance Objedire! for Precision: Analytic::,l precision is c::,Jculaled by expressing as a pe=tage the di:lference between results of analysis of dupiic:lle sampies reiarive ID the :1verage of those results for a given anaiyte. Precision c:m be expressed by the formula: where: RFD= (C1-C:) (C1+c:) + 2 X 100 RPD =Relative~ Diff=ce (% unitS) Cj = Con=tration of analyte in sample C2 = Concentration of analyte in repiic:lle On the occ:ision when three or more repiic:lle analyses are performed. precision is c::,lculated by expressing as a pe1~ the Sl3ndard deviation of the analytic::,l results of the repiic:lle determinations relative ID the average of those results for a given analyte. This precision measurement. relative standard deviation (%RSD), will have QA objectives identical to those for% RPD, and c:m be e."!JI""SSOO by the formula: RSD-(Swn<Ci-Cl2/n-l/2 where: (C1+ .... Cn)/n X JOO RSD = relative standard deviation(% units) C; = concentration of analyte measured in the ith repiic:lle, and (C1 + C2 + ... (:,Jin= C represents the average result n = number of replicate analyses The QA precision objective for metals analysis and other inorganic. parami:rers are di:lferent from those for organic anaiy=. These QA objectives are discussed separately in the sections below. 5.3.1 Organic Analyses (GC, GC/MS): For organic anaJys,:s precision is measured.by comparison of the.recove,y of. the target anaJytes in duplicate fortified samples·or duplicate·fortified blanks (MS/MSD or LCS/LCSD). QA objectives for precision as expres.5ed by the·RPD for duplicate analysis of.target anaJytes are :t.15% (GC/MS VOA), ± 50% (GC/MS ABN), ± 50% (PES), ± 20% (GC IH). Th= RPD limits are advisory only for investigative samples. Only evaluation of precision for standard matrices triggers corrective action. • • PARADIGM ANALYTICAL LABORATORY -LABORATORY QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN Doc# PALOMP100 Date: 01/01199 Page23of65 5.4 Quality Assurance Objective for Data Completeness: Complereness is a measure of the relative number of analytic::i.l data poirus which me:,t all the a=prance criteria required by the specific.analytical methods used The level of completeness can al.so be affected by loss or breakage of samples during rransport, as well as external problems which prolulJit colle::tion of the sample. Toe PAL QA oqjecrive for completeness is to have 90% of the data usable "'thmn qua!ific:nion. Toe ability to mret or e.-=ed this complereness oqjective is dep::ndent on the narure of samples submitted fur analysis. For =nnple, if the analytical methods proposed for use (particularly for organic analyses) are intended for analyses of environmental samples of low to meriium hazard, the applicability of these methods to non-routine matri= such as drum samples, mpes, air samples, etc. may result in poor method performance and therefore adversely imjDCt achievement of the data complereness goal . 6.0 PERSONNEL AND TRAINING Well-qualified and properly-trained per,;onnel are key aspectS of satisfactory laboratory performance. Although gciod facilities and equipment are essential they are of linle ,-a!ue -..ithmn well-trained personnel to milize them. For a small laboratory it is not JJOSSI"ble to set forth a rigid list of qualifications for each particular position. Education and experi= are considered together in judging the suitability of a pe=n for a job. As openings occur the appropriate combination of education and e,,.-perience n=sal}· for the job is considered. These are then evaluated in light of the individual applicants. Training is usually an "on the job" process. New pe=unel wmk mth an e,,.-perienced Staff member on a one-to-one basis: E:ich task is explaiuetl and dentonsrrated to the trainee. Toe necessary_ reference methods and equipment m:muais are given to the new ernploye:, to re:id and srudy. faperienced people are alwavs available to answer questions. Free =hange of ide:is and questions among the laixlratory staff is srrongly encoUr.Jged. Train= are instructed in the quality comrol practices of the methods they are learning. All pe=nnel are monitored by their supervisors for the correctness of their work. New employ= are required to achieve method specified levels of accuracy and precision before undertaking UIISUpeI\ised analysis of investigative samples. • • PARADIGM ANALYTICAL LABORATORY -LABORATORY QUALITY MANAGEMENT ·PLAN Doc# PALOMPIOO Date: 01/01/99 Page46 of65 11.0 ANALYTICALPROCEDURES Routine analytical sen ices are peiformed using standard EPA, or other approved methodology. In some cases, modification of Slailciard methods may be necessary m provide =re anaiyses of particularly complex maoices. When modification of Slaildard methods are peiformed. the specific alterations, as well as the reason for the change, will be reponed with the resnlts of analysis. Choice of analytical methods is determined by the. type of samples and the client/agency program represented. These programs include, bm are not limited to the following: o Drinking Water o Waste Water o Hazardous Waste 0 Air For non-routine anaiytical senices (e.g. special maoices, research projects, non-routine compotmd list, etc.), the method of choice is selected based on client needs and m-ai.lable technology. The laboratory's. reported practical quantitation limits PQLs) are based on program requirements, sample matrix. and in-house instrument detection limits. However, published MDL's are determined using clean maoices which are free of interferen=, and which are anaiyzed tmder optimal laboratory conditions. For actual sample analysis, these MDL's may not be routinely achie-.-able. Procedures in place to demonstrate that reponed dere...--tion !.ini.its are obtainable are c!=ribed in the ensuing subsections of this section. Individual sample detection limits may ,-ary from the laboratory's routinely reponed detection limits. This may be due to dilution requi=ents, variability in sample weight or volume used to perform the analysis, dry weight adjustmem for solid samples, the presence of analytical background contaminants, or other sample-related or analysis-related condirions. 11.1 Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry (GC/MS) 11.1.1 GC/MS Turning and Mass Calibration 11.1.2 Once an instrumem has been tuned, initial average response factors for analJ1es appropriate to the method are generated for at least three solutions containing known concentrations of authentic standards of compounds of concem Mass spectrometers are calibrated with petfluorooibuty.lamine to ensure correct mass assignment and relative peak heights. In addition,. at least once per day these instruments are tuned with decafluorooiphenylphosphine (DFIPP) for semivolatiles analysis and 4-bromofluorobenzene (BFB) for volatiles analysis. Ion abundances must fall within the.windows dictated by the specific method requirements. GC/MS: Initial Calibration Cal,brating solutions are generally cock:tails of the method target analytes. Calibration curves bracket the anticipated wmking range of the analysis. Linearity is verified by evaluating the response factors (RF) for the initial cahbration standards. For an acceptable cahbration, the relative standard devjation of the target anaJytes must be <25 percent for Calibrarion Check Compounds (CCC) analytes and. <35 percent· for the other analytes:. In addition, a minimum average RF of 0.30 for volatile targets (0.25 for bromoform) and 0.050 for.semivo.latile targets must be demonstrated for specified System Performance Check.Compotmds Q • PARADIGM ANALYTICAL LABORATORY -LABORATORY OUALTIY MANAGEMENT PLAN Doc# PALOMPlOO 11.1.3 Date: 01/01199 Page47 of65 (SPCCs). These specified SPCC's for routine volarile and semivolatile organics analysis are listed ii, Table 11.1.2-1. Cahbr.:ition data includmg line:irity verific:nion. is maintained in the laboratory's permanent records of instrument calibrations. GC/MS: Continuing Calibration At least once per day a ntidpoint calibration standard is analyzed to verify that the instrument responses are still within the initial calibration determination. The response factor· for each target compound in the standard is calculated and recorded, then compared to. the average RF from the initial calibration. If significant RF drift is observed (>30%), appropriate corrective action is taken to restore confidence ii, the instrumental measurements. In addition. a minimum RF of 0.30 or 0.050 for the volatile and semivolatile targets respectively must be reported for the SPCCs . • • • PARADIGM ANALYTICAL LABORATORY -LABORATORY QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN Doc:# PALOMPlOO Date: 01/01/99 P:lge 48 of 65 · TABLE 11.1.2-1 GC/MS SYSTEM PERFORMANCE CHECK COMPOUNDS (SPCCs) Volatiles I Semivolatiles chloromethane I N-nitroso-di-N-propyi.amine 1.1-dichloroethane I hexachlorocyclopentadiene bromoform 2.4-dinitrophenol 1,1,2.2-tetrachlorocthane 4-nitrophenoi chlorobenzene I .. I I I • • PARADIGM ANALYTICAL LABORATORY -LABORATORY QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN Doc# PALOMPIOO Date: 01/01/99 Page 49 of65 11.1.4 GC/MS: Quality Control All GC/MS aoalyses include analysis of a method blank LCS and a matri.x spike. matrix spike duplic:ite in each lot of twenty samples. The matrix spike solutions contain all the method targets and are used for both matrix spikes and blank spikes. In addition, appropriate surrogate compotmds as specified in Table 5.2.2-1 are spiked into each sample. Recoveries from method spikes and surrogate compounds are calculated and recorded to maintain a hist□!}' of system performance. Performance Evaluation samples are aoalyzed periodically to compare and verify laborator,· performance against standards prepared by outside sources . PARADIGM ANALYTICAL LABORATORY -LABORATORY QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN Doc# PALOMPIOO 11.1.5 Date: 01/01/99 Page50 of65 GCIMS: Detection Limits The laboratory's qnanritation limits routinely used for reporting GCJMS data are compared with laboratory-determined method detection limits to ensure. that .the -reported valnes are attainable. Instrument detection limits are determined from at least seven analyses of target compounds measured at three to five times the reporting IimiL The calculated instrument detection.limit is the 95% confidence limit associated with the mensured values. 11.2 Gas Chromatography (GC) 11.2.1 Ge: Initial Calibration Initial calibration curves for target compounds appropriate to the method are generated for at least three · solutions containing known conc::mrations of authentic standards. The working standards inclnc!,: a calibration blank and cover the anticipated range of measurement. At least one of the calibration standards will be at or near the desired instrument qnantitation limiL The correlation coefficient resulting from a linear regression of the calibration points must be. equal· to or greater than 0:95 for single component analytes to consider the response linear overthe calibration range. If a correlation coefficient of 0.95 cannot be achieved, additional standards must be. analyzed to define the calibration curve, or nonlinear regression may be applied. • 11.2.2 Ge: Continuing Calibration • The response of the instrument will be verified for each analysis sequence by evaluation of a mid-range calibration check standard. In ord..-r to demonstrate that. the initial calibration cmve is still valid, the calibration check standard must be within± 20% recovery of the initial calibration for the compounds of interest or the instrument must be r=librated. Optionally, initial calibration can be performed at the beginning of the analysis sequence. Within the analysis sequence, instrument drift will be monitored by analysis of a mid-range calibration standard every 30 injections. The % difference (%D) in for the continuing calibration standard recovery is calculated.and recorded If significanl'(>20%) calibration drift.is observed for the compounds of interest, appropriate corrective actions will be taken to restore confidence in the instrumental measurements . • • • PARADIGM ANALYTICAL LABORATORY -LABORATORY QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN Doc# PALOMPlOO 11.2.3 11.2.4 11.6. 7 Date: 01/01/99 P:ige51 of65 GC: Quality Control At least one method blank. LCS. and one matrix spike/matrix spike duplicate set are included fur each 20 samples processed. The method blanks .are examined to determine if conrnroiuarinn is being introduced into samples by the laboratory. Tne matrix spikes are examined to detennine both precision and accuracy. Accuracy is measured by the percent recovery of the spikes. These recoveries are recorded to monitor method accuracy. Precision is measured by the reproducibiliry of dnplicate method spikes and is calculated as relative percem difference (% RPD). The laboratory goal for RPD measurements is ± 25% and is ad;isory only for foni.fied samples. In addition. appropriate SllITOgate compounds as specified in Table 5.2.2-1 are spiked into each · errvironmenta! sample. These· recoveries are recorded to maintain a history of system performance. GC: Detection Limits The Laboratory's PQLs routinely used fur reporting GC data are compared with laborarory detennined method detection limits to ensure that the reporting values = attainable. Method d..'"teC!ion limits are determined from the replicate analysis of target compounds measured at three to five times the reporting limit. The calculated instrument detection limit is the 95% confidence interval assoc:iaied with at least seven replicate measurements. For non-routine compounds, the reponed PQLs.are limited by the lowest calibration standard analyzed for the respective method. Balances Laboratory balances are ca!..torated aod serviced annually by a qualified engin=. In addition. a designated analyst verifies the balance calibrations with NIST traceable Class S weights on each working day. A record of calibrations and checks are kept in the laboratory balance log. • • PARADlGM ANALYTICAL LABORATORY -LABORATORY OUALlTY MANAGEMENT .PLAN Doc# PALOMPlOO Date: 01101199 Page52 of65 12.0 DATA REDUCTION AND REPORTING 12.1 Data Reduction Data reduction is performed or monitored by the individual aoalyStS and consists of calculating conc..-nrnu:ions in samples from the raw. data obtained from the measuring instro=ts. The complexity of the data reduction is dependent on the specific analytical method and the number of discrete operations (e.=ction._ dilution._ and concenrnu:ion) involved in obtaining the samples in a form that can be analyzed by the appropriate instrumentation. For those methods utilizing a calibration curve. sample respo= is applied to the linear regression line or average response factor to obtain an initial raw result which is then factored imo equations to obtain the estimate of the concentration in the original sample. Rounding to within two significmt digits (SDs) of the number of SDs reported with the final result is not performed until the final result is calculated to avoid rounding errors. Results are normally expressed with three SDs for metals and inorganics results and 2 SDs for organics results. Copies of all raw data and the calculations used to generate the final results are retained on file to allow reconstruction of the data reduction process at a later date. 12.2 Reporting Results The primary respot1S1bility for the completeness and accuracy of all results and documents reStS with department supervisors. Al the conclusion of the analytical work a supervisor, in conjunction with the persons assigned to perform the analyses, reconciles all documents. In particular he/she verifies the sample !D's, the analyses requested by the client and the test results. The results are reviewed and verified for a=acy. The final report is then prepared for typing. Analytical data supplied by another laboratory are identified on a subcontract notice form. Unusual results or QC problems are discussed in the report cover or a QC Notice. The laboratory director signs the·report or authorizes employees to sign all reports. All records are the property of Paradigm Analytical Laboratory Inc. and are considered proprietary and confidential. Disclosure of information to third parties "ill be made only on request of the original client or by order of a court oflaw. Records are kept in "active" files for one year and are then moved to "'inactive" storage for two years unless other arrangements are made. 13.0 INTERNAL QUALITY CON°IROL CHECKS The quality of analytical data.generated.by PAL is controlled by the implementation of this Lai:Joratory Quaiity Management Plan. The types of internal quality control checks are descnbed belo"~ Method'Blank Method blank.usually consist of laboratory reagent grade water treated in the same manner as the sample (i.e., digested, extracted, distilled, etc:) which is then analyzed and reported as a standard sample would be . t:.aboratorv ControrSample. • • PARADIGM ANALYTICAL LABORATORY -LABORATORY QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN Doc# PALQMP100 Date: 01/01/99 Page53of65 A laboratory control sample is a sample of laboratory reagent water or the solid extraction appararus fortified (spiked) with the analytes of interest which is prepared and analyzed with the associated sample batch. Method blank spikes are not included with volatiles analysis since the same function is served by the calibration standard analysis. Laboratorv Control Sample for lnorganics This is a standard solution with a certified con=tration which is analyzed as.a diluted.sample and is used to monitor analytical accuracy. Matrix Spike A matrix_ spike is an aliquot of an investigative sample which is fortified (spiked) with the anal;-tes of interest and analyzed with an associated sample batch to monitor the effects of the investigative sample matrix on the analytical results. Laboratorv Duplicate· Sample Duplicate samples are obtained by splitting a field sample into two aliquots and performing two separate analyses on the aliquots. The analysis of laboratory duplicates monitor,; method precision; however, it may be affded by sample inhomogeneity, particularly in the case of nonaqueous samples. Laboratory duplicates are pe,formed only in association with selected protocols and at the client's request. OC Check Sample This is a QC sample of known concentration obtained from the U.S. EPA, NIST, NIOSH or a commccial source. 14.0 EXTERNAL QUALITY CONTROL PROGRAMS The performance audits are in the form of performance evaluation samples submitted by the auditing agency. System audits involve on-site evaluation of PAL_ The chemistry laboratory participates in the following pe:formance audits: EPA Water Pollution -EPAWater Supply -WP Series (Semi-Annual) WS Series (Semi-Annual) APPENDIX G • HEAL TH AND SAFETY PLAN • MP?;~Jl~◊N!J~ Enginterins & Hnl'ironmental Solllrions 0 • • SITE HEAL TH AND SAFETY PLAN CRISTEX FACILITY SITE NAME: OXFORD, NORTH CAROLINA MID-ATLANTIC JOB NO. 98R-705 Prepared By: MID-ATLANTIC ASSOCIATES, P.A. IN CONJUNCTION WITH HASP -EPA HEALTH AND SAFETY PLANNER VERSION 3.0/4.0 December 28, 1999 Revised October 9, 2002 MP?;~J1~4NTJS: En_~inet>ring & £1rvironmen1a/ Solutions • • SITE HEAL TH AND SAFETY PLAN CRISTEX FACILITY SITE NAME: OXFORD, NORTH CAROLINA MID-ATLANTIC JOB NO. 98R-705 Prepared By: MID-ATLANTIC ASSOCIATES, P.A . The undersigned have read and understood the Site Health and Safety Plan: Signature Date Signature Date Approved: :s:¼~~ Date: 10/ 1 I { oz___ MP?;~\fi1~4NTJ~ Engin,•ering & Environmental Svlulions TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................... 1 1 .1 Scooe and Applicability of the Site Health and Safety Plan ......................... 1 1 .2 Visitors ................................................................................................ 1 2.0 KEY PERSONNEL/IDENTIFICATION OF HEALTH AND SAFETY ...................... 1 2.1 Kev Personnel ...................................................................................... 1 2.2 Site Soecific Health and Safety Personnel ................................................ 2 2. 3 Oraanizational Resoonsibilitv .................................................................. 2 3.0 TASK/OPERATION SAFETY AND HEALTH RISK ANALYSIS .......................... 2 3.1 Historic Overview of Site ....................................................................... 2 3.2 Task by Task Risk Analysis .................................................................... 3 3.3 Task Hazard Descriotions ....................................................................... 4 4.0 PERSONNEL TRAINING REQUIREMENTS .................................................... 4 4.1 Preassignment and Annual Refresher Trainino .......................................... 4 • 4.2 Site Supervisors Training ....................................................................... 5 4.3 Training and Briefing Tooics ......................... : ......................................... 5 5.0 PERSONAL PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT TO BE USED ..................................... 5 . 5. 1 Levels of Protection .............................................................................. 6 5.2 Level D Personnel Protective Equioment .................................................. 6 5.3 Site Level of Protection ......................................................................... 6 5 .4 Reassessment of Protection Program ....................................................... 6 6.0 MEDICAL SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS ................................................ 7 6.1 Baseline or Preassignment Monitoring ...................................................... 7 6.2 Periodic Monitoring ............................................................................... 8 6.3 E:rnosure/lniurv/Medical Suoport ............................................................. 8 6.4 Exit Phvsical ......................................................................................... 8 7 .0 FREQUENCY AND TYPES OF AIR MONITORING/SAMPLING ......................... 8 9.0 EMERGENCY ASSISTANCE ....................................................................... 9 9.1 Nearest Medical Assistance .................................................................... 9 • 9.2 Safe Work Practices ............................................................................ 11 MP?~Nl~~NTJS: Eni;:ineer/11.~ & £n1·iro11mt•111a{ Sol111ions • TABLE OF CONTENTS (CON'T) 10.0 DECONTAMINATION PLAN .................................................................. 11 11.0 EMERGENCY RESPONSE/CONTINGENCY PLAN ..................................... 11 11 . 1 Pre-Emergency Planning .................................................................... 1 1 11 .2 Personnel Roles and Lines of Authority ................................................ 11 11 .3 Emergency Contact/Notification System .............................................. 12 • • MP?;~\fl~4NTl~ Engineerini: & £ndronmtnt11/ Solutions 0 • • 1.0 INTRODUCTION This section of the Site Health and Safety Plan (HASP) document defines general applicability and general responsibilities with respect to compliance with Health and Safety programs. 1 . 1 Scope and Aoplicability of the Site Health and Safety Plan The purpose of this Site Health and Safety Plan is to define the requirements and designate protocols to be followed at the Site during site assessment and remedial activities . .A.pplicability extends to all empioyees, contractors, subcontractors, and visitors. All personnel on site, contractors and subcontractors included, shall be informed of the site emergency response procedures and any potential safety hazards of the operation. This HASP summarizes those hazards in Table 3.1 and defines protective measures planned for the site. During development of this plan consideration was given to current safety standards as defined by EPA/OSHA/NIOSH, health effects and standards for known contaminants, and procedures designed to account for the potential for exposure to unknown substances . 1 .2 Visitors All visitors entering the work area will be required to read and verify compliance with the provisions of this HASP. In the event that a visitor does not adhere to the provisions of the HASP, he/she will be requested to leave the work area. All nonconformance incidents will be recorded in the site log. 2.0 KEY PERSONNEL/IDENTIFICATION OF HEALTH AND SAFETY 2.1 Key Personnel The following personnel and organizations are critical to the planned activities at the Site: • l'vlid-A tlantic Associates represenrctives, • Drilling subcontractors, • Leonhardt Environmental representatives . MP?s-{\fl~◊NTJ<; En~i,reerin~ ,, £11l'ironme1Jtal Solutions • • Site Health and Safety Plan Cristex Facility Oxford, North Carolina 2.2 Site Specific Health and Safety Personnel Revised October 11, 2002 Page 2 The Site Health and Safety Officer (HSO) has total responsibility for ensuring that the provisions of this HASP are adequate and implemented in the field. Changing field conditions may require decisions to be made concerning adequate protection programs. The HSO at the sire wiil be Mr. Gary Fisher of Mid-Atlantic Associates. 2.3 Oraanizational Responsibiiirv The North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Solid Waste Management Division, Superfund Section (Superfund Section) is the responsible regulatory agency for this site. Ms. Kathleen Roush will serve as the team leader and Site Supervisor. Mr. Fisher will serve as HSO and as Site Supervisor in the absence of Ms. Roush. Mr. Thomas A. Proctor, P.G. is the Corporate Health and Safety Officer. 3.0 TASK/OPERATION SAFETY AND HEALTH RISK ANALYSIS 3.1 Historical Overview of Si1e This HASP defines the hazards and methods to protect personnel from those hazards as identified in previous site work or background information. For a thorough overview of historical information concerning the Site see the following documents: Integrated Preliminary .A.ssessment/Site Inspection Cristex Drum Site North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Superfund Section June 1999 Remedial Investigation Workplan Cristex Facility Oxford, North Carolina Mid-/\ tlanric Associ2res, P .. '" .. October 11, 2002 The Cristex site is located on Industry Drive, approximately on-half mile west of the intersection of Route 15 in Oxford, Granville County, North Carolina. A building approximately 150,000 square feet in size is present on-site. The site was MP?~~J7~◊NTJS: Engineering & Enl'/ronmental Solutions • • • Site Health and Safety Plan Cristex Facility Oxford, North Carolina Revised October 11, 2002 Page 3 previously used as a warp knit fabric mill. Currently the building on-site is used as a warehouse for CVS Pharmacy. A stormwater lagoon is present at the north end of the facility. This lagoon was used for the storage of process wastewater until 1986. Rainwater has collected in the lagoon over the past several years. Samples collected from the water contained lead (3 µg/L) and bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (11.2 µg/L). Sludge at the base of the lagoon contained TCE, cis-1,2- dichloroethene, 2,-butanone, benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, 1,4-dichlorobenzene, and 1,2-dichlorobenzene at concentrations far below one part per million (ppm). Xylene was present in one sample at a maximum concentration of approximately 9.9 ppm and chlorobenzene was present at 3.01 ppm. The sludge also exhibited concentrations of zinc (420 ppmi above the average background concentration of 61 ppm. Based upon an investigation conducted by the Superfund Section, additional assessment activities are required to determine the impact to groundwater and soil at the site and lagoon area. This HASP is primarily designed to address site assessment activities of impacted soiis and groundwater. Groundwater at the site has been impacted primarily with tetrachoroethene (PCE), and may contain degradation products of PCE such as trichloroethene (TCEi. Well MW-3 exhibited PCE concentrations of 6,900 ,ug/L. Nickel has also been detected in one groundwater monitoring well located adjacent to the lagoon area (MW-1). 3.2 Task by Task Risk Analvsis The evaluation of hazards is based upon the knowledge of site background presented in Section 3.1, and anticipated risks posed by the specific operation. Table 3. 1 provides a summary of the chemical hazards for the site. The following subsections describe each task/operation in terms of the spec1nc hazards associated with it. In addition, the protective measures to be implemented during completion of those operations are also identified. • Groundwater Monitoring Well Installation and Sampling -Wells will be installed to complete the assessment of the impact to groundwater on-site. Wells will be installed using a hollow-stem auger drilling rig or air'hammer drilling rig. During drilling, soiis wiil be sc~eened and logged, and the wells installed. • Soil Sampling -Soil samples will also be collected to complete assessment activities at the site . MP?;~Jl~1'NTlS: Engint•,•rin!/ & £11vironmen111! Solutions • • • Site Health and Safety Plan Cristex Facility Revised October 11, 2002 Page 4 Oxford, North Carolina 3.3 Task Hazard Descriptions Hazards potentially encountered include the contact, inhalation, or ingestion of volatile organic compounds or metals. TABLE 3.1 TASK ANALYSIS CHEMICAL HAZARDS OF CONCERN CONTAMINANT TLV I IDLH SOURCE I ROUTES OF CONCENTRATION I EXPOSURE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS -ppm Chlorobenzene 75 I 2,400 3.0 lnh, Ing, Con 1 ,2-Dichlorobenzene 50 I 1,000 0. 11 lnh, Ing, Abs, Con 1 ,4-Dichlorobenzene 75 i 1,000 0.07 lnh, Ing, Con Trichloroethene 25 I 1,000 0.0006 lnh, Ing, Con Tetrachloroethene 25 I 100 6.2 lnh, Ing, Con Vinyl Chloride 1 I NE 0.005 (water) lnh, Ing, Con METALS Antimony 0.5 I 50 I 1,700 lnh, Ing, Con Chromium 0.5 I 250 200 lnh, Ing, Con Nickel 0.015 I 10 0. 148 (water) lnh, Ing, Con Zinc NE I NE 420 Ing, Con Notes: lnh -Inhalation Con -Contact mglm3 -milligrams per cubic meter Ing -Ingestion Abs -Absorption NE -None established ppm -parts per miilion 4.0 PERSONNEL TRAINING REQUIREMENTS Consistent with OSHA 's 29 CFR 1910.120 regulation covering Hazardous Waste Operations and Emergency Response, ail site personnel are required to be trained in accordance with the standard. At a minimum all personnel are required to be trained to recognize the hazards on-sire, the provisions of this HAS?, and the responsible personnel. 4.1 Preassignment and Annual Refresher Training Prior to arrival on site, each employer will be responsible for certifying that his/her employees meet the requirements of preassignment training, consistent with OSHA 29 CFR 1910.120 paragraph (e)(3). The employer should be able to provide a I MP?;~\fl~~NTJS: Engineering & Enl"ironmenral Sol111ions • Site Health and Safety Plan Cristex Facility Oxford, North Carolina Revised October 11, 2002 Page 5 document certifying that each general site worker has received 40 hours of instruction off the site, and 24 hours of training for any workers who are on site only occasionally for a speciiic task. If an individual employee has work experience and/or training that is equivalent to that provided in the initial training, an employer may waive the 40-hour training so long as that equivalent experience is documented or certified. All personnel must also receive eight hours of refresher training annually. 4.2 Site Suoervisors Trainina Consistent with OSHA 29 CFR 197 0.120 paragraph (e}(S), individuals designated as site supervisors require an additional eight hours of training. Kathy Roush will serve as Site Supervisor. 4.3 Trainina and Briefina Topics The following items wiil be discussed by a qualified individual at the site pre-entry briefing(s) or periodic site briefings. • Air Monitoring, Sec. 7.0; [29 CFR 1910.120(h)] • Chemical hazards, Table 3.1 • Engineering controls and work practices • Medical surveillance requirements • Personnel protective equipment, Sec. 5.0 • Physical hazards, Table 3.2 • Respiratory protection, Sec. 5 .8 • Site Control, Sec. 8.0; [29 CFR 1910.120/d)] • Site characterization and analysis, Sec. 3.0 • Symptoms of overexposure to hazards • Training requirements, Sec. 4.0; [29 CFR 1910. 120(e)] • Emergency response plan, Sec. 10.0; [29 CFR 1910.120(1)] 5.0 PERSONAL PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT TO BE USED This section describes the general requirements of the EPA designated Levels of Protection (A-0), and the specific levels oi protection required for each task at the Site. MP?;~\f1~◊NTJ~ Engineering & £n1•irnnmen1al Solutions 0 • • Site Health and Safety Plan Cristex Facility Oxford, North Carolina 5. 1 Levels of Protection Revised October 11, 2002 Page 6 Personnel wear protective equipment when response activities involve known or suspected atmospheric contamination vapors, gases, or particulates may be generated by site activities, or when direct contact with skin-affecting substances may occur. Full facepiece respirators protect lungs, gastrointestinal tract, and eyes against airborne toxicant. Chemical-resistant clothing protects the skin from contact with skin-destructive and absorbable chemicals. For this project Level D protection is planned. If hazardous conditions are identified that warrant additional protection, the sampling will be stopped. Personal protective equipment for Level D are described below. 5.2 Level D Personnel Protective Eauipment: • Coveralls • Gloves • Boots/shoes (chemical-resistant with steel toe and shank) • Safety glasses • Hard hat 5.3 Site Level of Protection The following levels of protection will be utilized during the specified activities at the site. Drilling and Groundwater Sampling Soil Sampling Water and Sludge Sampling 5. 5 Reassessment of Protection Proo ram Level D Level D Level D The Level of Protection provided by PPE selection wiil be upgraded or downgraded based upon a change in site c:inditicns or findings of investigations. When a significant change occurs, the hazards should be reassessed. Some indicators of the need for reassessment are: MP?;~J'1~4NTJ~ Engineering & Enl'ironmentui Solutions 0 • • Site Health and Safety Plan Cristex Facility Revised October 11, 2002 Page 7 Oxford, North Carolina • Commencement of a new work phase, such as the start of excavation activities in a different portion of the site. • Increase or decrease in the amount of dust produced • Change in job tasks during a work phase. • Change of season/weather. • When temperature extremes or individual medical considerations limit the effectiveness of PPE. • Contaminants other than those previously identified are encountered. • Change in ambient levels of contaminants. • Change in work scope that effects the degree of contact with contaminants, 6.0 MEDICAL SURVEiLLANCE REQUIREMENTS Medical monitoring programs are designed to track the physical condition of employees on a regular basis as well as survey pre-employment or baseline conditions prior to potential exposures. The medical surveillance program is a part of each employers Health and Safety program . 6.1 Baseline or Preassignment Monitoring Prior to being assigned to a hazardous or a potentially hazardous activity involving exposure to toxic materials employee must receive a preassignment or baseline physical. The content of the physical is to be determined by the employers medical consultant. As suggested by NIOSH/OSHA/USCG/EPA's Occupational Safety & Health Guidance Manual for Hazardous Waste Site Activities, the minimum medical monitoring requirements for work at the Site is as follows: Complete medical and work histories. Physical examination. Pulmonary function tests (FVC and FEV1 ). Chest. X-ray (every 2 years). '::<G. Eye examination and visual acuity. i~udiometry. Urinalysis. Blood chemistry . MP?;~J}~~NTIS: Engineerin,: ,~ £nvironmenral Solutions • • Site Health and Safety Plan Cristex Facility Oxford, North Carolina Revised October 11, 2002 Page 8 The preassignment physical should categorize employees as fit-for-duty and able to wear respiratory protection. Mid-Atlantic personnel are required to be on Mid-Atlantic's medical monitoring program, and subcontractors on their own approved medical monitoring program. 6.2 Periodic Monitorina In addition ta a baseline physical, most employees require a periodic physical within the last 1 2 months. The employers medical consultant should prescribe an adequate medical which fulfills OSHA 29 CFR 1910.120 requirements. 6. 3 Exposure/Injury/Medical Support As a follow-up to an injury or possible exposure above established exposure limits, all employees are entitled to and encouraged to seek medical attention and physical testing. Depending upon the type of exposure, it is critical to perform follow-up testing within 24-48 hours. It will be up to the employer's medical consultant to advise the type of test required to accurately monitor for exposure effects . 6.4 Exit Physical At termination of employment or permanent reassignment to an activity or location which does not represent a risk of exposure to hazardous substances, an employee shall require an exit physical. If his/her last physical was within the last 6 months, the advising medical consultant has the righ1 to determine adequacy and necessity of exit exam. 7 .0 FREQUENCY AND TYPES OF AIR MONITORING/SAMPLING The purpose of air monitoring is to identify and quantify airborne contaminants in order to verify and determine the level of worker protection needed. Initial screening for identification is often qualitative, i.e., the contaminant, or the class to which it belongs, is demonstrmed to be present but the determination of its concentration (quantification) must await subsequent testing. For the purposes of this investiga1ion, an organic vapor analyzer (OVA) will be utilized to monitor ambient air concentrations. If the concentrations of VOCs exceeds 5 ppm above background concentrations, sampling will cease until concentrations decrease . MP?;~J7-/}NT]<; £11gi11e1•rin!/ & £n1•iro11mrntal Solution:; • • Site Health and Safety Plan Cristex Facility Oxford, North Carolina 8.0 SITE WORK ZONES Revised October 11, 2002 Page 9 In order to reduce the potential spread of hazardous material by workers from contaminated areas to clean zones, work zones will be delineated in the field. Because work areas will be shifting on a frequent basis, these zones will be delineated in the field. 9.0 EMERGENCY ASSISTANCE 9.1 Nearest Medical Assistance Drawing 9 .1 provides a map of the route to the nearest medical facility that can provide emergency care for individuals who may experience an injury or exposure on site. The route to the hospital should be verified by the HSO, and should be familiar to all site personnel. Hospital Location: Directions: Granville Medical Center 1010 College Street Oxford, North Carolina 919-690-3000 Proceed east of Industry Drive to the light. Turn left at the light on to Lewis Street. Proceed north for about one mile and turn right on Williamsboro Street. Stay on Williamsboro for about 0.5 miles and turn left on College Street. Hospital is approximately O. 7 5 miles north on College Street on the left side of the street. In the event of an emergency, the following individual on-site has current certification in CPR and/or first aid: Fred Ammons. MP?~¾Jl~,}NTJ~ Enf!ineering & Environm,,ntal Solutions Site Health and Safety Plan Cristex Facility Oxford, North Carolina ROUTE TO HOSPITAL J Kiotts -"' ( I I Omi Revised October 11, 2002 Page 10 DRAWING 9.1 0.5 ,. 1.5 • Site Health and Safety Plan Cristex Facility Oxford, North Carolina 9.2 Safe Work Practices Listed below are standing orders for the Work Zone. Revised October 7 7, 2002 Page 11 • No smoking, eating, or drinking in this zone. • No horse play. • No matches or lighters in this zone. • Line of sight must be in position. • Wear the appropriate level of protection as defined 1n the Safety Plan. 10.0 DECONTAMINATION PLAN Consistent with the levels of protection required, the list below prov1aes a step by step representation of the personnel decontamination process. These procedures should be modified to suit site conditions and protective ensembles in use. All equipment used for decontamination shall be decontaminated or disposed of properly. • LEVEL D DECONTAMINATION STEPS • Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Remove outer garments (i.e., coveralls) Remove gloves Wash hands and face 11.0 EMERGENCY RESPONSE/CONTINGENCY PLAN This section describes contingencies and emergency planning procedures to be implemented at the Site. This plan is compatible with local, state and federal disaster and emergency management plans as appropriate. 11 . 1 Pre-Emergency Planning During the site briefings held periodically, all employees will be trained 1n and reminded of provisions of the emergenc·; response plan. 11 .2 Personnel Roles and Lines of Authority The Site Supervisor has primary responsibility for responding to and correcting emergency situations. This includes taking appropriate measure to ensure the MP?;~Jl~4NTl9. Engintt'ring & Enl'ironmenral Solutions • Site Health and Safety Plan Cristex Facility Oxford, North Carolina Revised October 11, 2002 Page 12 safety of site personnel and the public. Possible actions may involve evacuation of personnel from the site area, and evacuation of adjacent residents. He/she is additionally responsible for ensuring that corrective measures have been implemented, appropriate authorities notified, and follow-up reports completed. The HSO may be called upon to act on the behalf of the site supervisor, and will direct responses to any medical emergency. The individual contractor organizations are responsible for assisting the project manager in his/her mission within the parameters of their scope of work. The Site Supervisor is Kathleen Roush, P.G. The HSO is Fred Ammons or Gary Fisher 11. 3 Emergency Contact/Notification System The following list provides names and telephone numbers for emergency contact personnel. In the event of a medical emergency, personnel will take direction from the HSO and notify the appropriate emergency organization. In the event of a fire or spill, the site supervisor will notify the appropriate local, state, and federal agencies . Organization Telephone Ambulance: 911 Police: 911 Fire: 911 Forsyth Memorial Hospital: 336-718-2000 Poison Control Center: 800-848-6946 EPA Emergency Response Team 908-321-6660 DENR, Solid Waste Section: 919-733-4996 National Response Center 800-424-8802 Center for Disease Control 404-488-4100 Chemtrec 800-424-9555 MP?;¾-J~iNTJS: Engineering & Environmen111/ Solutions