Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMO-4603_15573_CA_F&T_20230216 FATE & TRANSPORT GROUNDWAER MODELING REPORT STANLEY CREEK COUNTRY STORE INCIDENT NO. 15573 STANLEY, GASTON COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA Prepared For: Southeastern Geological Services Post Office Box 441 Shelby, North Carolina 28151 BLE Project Number J23-19484-01 February 16, 2023 Fate & Transport Groundwater Modeling February 16, 2023 Stanley, Gaston County, North Carolina BLE Project No. J22-19484-01 i of i TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION.......................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Project Background .......................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Current Groundwater Quality .......................................................................................................... 1 2.0 FATE & TRANSPORT MODELING ......................................................................................... 2 2.1 BIOSCREEN Inputs ........................................................................................................................ 2 2.1.1 Hydrogeology .................................................................................................................................. 2 2.1.2 Dispersion ........................................................................................................................................ 2 2.1.3 Adsorption ....................................................................................................................................... 2 2.1.4 Biodegradation ................................................................................................................................. 2 2.1.5 General ............................................................................................................................................. 3 2.1.6 Source Zone Data ............................................................................................................................. 3 2.2 Predictive Modeling ......................................................................................................................... 3 2.2.1 Intersection with Stanley Creek ....................................................................................................... 3 2.2.2 Predicted Concentrations in Stanley Creek ...................................................................................... 3 3.0 CONCLUSIONS ............................................................................................................................ 5 Appendices Appendix A SGS 2022 Semi-Annual Groundwater Monitoring Report Appendix B Tables Appendix C BIOSCREEN Inputs Appendix D First Order Decay Coefficients Analysis Appendix E BIOSCREEN Output Appendix F StreamStats Report Phase I ESA - 455 Mills Gap Road February 9, 2023 Arden, Buncombe County, North Carolina BLE Project No. J22-18805-01 1 of 5 1.0 INTRODUCTION Bunnell-Lammons Engineering (BLE) performed the fate & transport groundwater modeling effort in general accordance with BLE Proposal No. P23-0178 dated January 27, 2023. BLE’s proposal was accepted by Mr. Richard Kelly, P.G., with Southeastern Geological Services (SGS). 1.1 Project Background The former Stanley Creek Country Store is located at 236 Mauney Road in Stanley, Gaston County, North Carolina (herein referred to as the “Site”). BLE reviewed documents obtained via the North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (NCDEQ) Division of Waste Management (DMW) Laserfiche Weblink. The store operated as a convenience store with gasoline and kerosene sales from 1972 from 1993. In 1996, the underground storage tank (UST) system, comprised of one 1,000-gallon kerosene UST, one 4,000-gallon gasoline UST, and one 6,000-gallon gasoline UST was permanently closed by removal. During the closure activities, a release of petroleum materials that impacted soil and groundwater was detected. Beginning in 1996, soil and groundwater remedial activities were performed at the Site. Those remedial activities included soil removal, several aggressive fluid vapor recovery (AFVR) events, air sparge/soil vapor extraction, and free product removal using Xitech pumps. It is our understanding that active remediation activities have not occurred at the Site since 2016. The incident is considered High Risk due to exceedances of the North Carolina Groundwater Quality Standards (2L Standards) and the presence of several active water supply wells within 1,000 feet of the release area. It is our understanding that Mr. Brad Newton, the Site’s incident manager with the NCDEQ UST Section, requested that groundwater modeling be performed to evaluate the potential impacts that the residual groundwater contamination could have on Stanley Creek. 1.2 Current Groundwater Quality Mr. Kelly provided BLE with a Semi-Annual Groundwater Monitoring Report prepared by SGS and dated September 30, 2022. The report without the laboratory report is included in Appendix A. The report indicates that the groundwater in the source area, in the vicinity of monitoring wells MW-1 and VMW-1 and product test well PTW-1, has been remediated. However, residual groundwater contamination in exceedance of 2L Standards remains downgradient of the source area and appears to be migrating toward Stanley Creek, which is located approximately 160 feet southeast of the source area. The groundwater contaminants of concern include benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, xylene, methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE), and naphthalene. The zone of groundwater impacts is primarily located around monitoring well MW-2 and product testing well (PTW-2), also known as P-2. Phase I ESA - 455 Mills Gap Road February 9, 2023 Arden, Buncombe County, North Carolina BLE Project No. J22-18805-01 2 of 5 2.0 FATE & TRANSPORT MODELING BIOSCREEN is a software package developed by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) to simulate the natural attenuation of petroleum constituents in groundwater. For purposes of the BIOSCREEN model, BLE assumed the groundwater contaminant plume to be represented by the migration of benzene, toluene, and naphthalene, because those three contaminants of concern that have the most stringent North Carolina 2B Surface Water Standards (2B Standards) and/or North Carolina In-Stream Target Values for Surface Waters (In-Stream Target). 2.1 BIOSCREEN Inputs The following sections provide a summary of the inputs selected for the modeling exercise. The inputs are summarized in Table 1 and the subsequent sections correspond to the BIOSCREEN Input module (see Appendix B). 2.1.1 Hydrogeology BLE sourced slug test and hydraulic gradient information from the Comprehensive Site Assessment Addendum Corrective Action Plan prepared by SGS and dated May 28, 1998. The linear groundwater velocity was reported in monitoring well MW-7 and product testing well PTW-2, as 3.25 feet per year (ft/year) and 0.35 ft/year, respectively. For purposes of this modeling exercise, BLE used the average of the groundwater velocity at MW-7 and PTW-2 and this data presents the general groundwater velocities in the area being evaluated. As such, the modeling simulation utilized a groundwater velocity of 1.8 ft/year. 2.1.2 Dispersion Dispersion is essentially the migration of contaminants in groundwater caused by the spreading of mass from highly concentrated areas to less concentrated areas. Dispersion is quantified by multiplying the groundwater velocity by dispersivity coefficient. Dispersivity can be estimated using the length of the historical dimensions of the groundwater contaminant plume, estimated to be around 170 feet. 2.1.3 Adsorption The migration of contaminants in groundwater can be slowed via the presence of organics (i.e., carbon) in the soil. A retardation factor of one represents no retardation and the migration rate of dissolved contaminants is equal to that of the groundwater velocity. For modeling purposes, BLE used a retardation factor of one for each compound as it represents the most conservative approach. This approach is conservative as it is very common for retardation of contaminant migration to occur. 2.1.4 Biodegradation The natural attenuation or biodegradation of petroleum compounds is commonly simulated using first order decay coefficients. For purposes of the modeling effort, BLE assumes that 1st order decay of the benzene, toluene, naphthalene contaminant plumes would occur. BLE estimated the first order decay coefficients and subsequent half-life for benzene, toluene, and naphthalene by plotting the concentrations over time as measured in either monitoring well MW-2 or product test well PTW-2 – with the selection determined by which well exhibits the highest, current contaminant concentrations between the two wells for benzene, toluene, and naphthalene. An exponential trend line matched to the plotted data sets and first order equations for each trend line was obtained. The first order decay coefficients were sourced from each trend line equation and the subsequent half-life was calculated by dividing 0.693 by the first order decay coefficient. The analysis is included in Appendix B. Phase I ESA - 455 Mills Gap Road February 9, 2023 Arden, Buncombe County, North Carolina BLE Project No. J22-18805-01 3 of 5 2.1.5 General The General section in the BIOSCREEN Input model establishes the modeled area by length and width. For purposes of BLE’s model, the length varied by the distance from the well exhibiting the highest concentration of the contaminant of interest and the subsequent distance from the well to Stanley Creek. The contaminant plume width was kept consistent between models at 25 feet. 2.1.6 Source Zone Data The saturated thickness of the contaminant plume was estimated to be 15 feet, based on a review of data included in the Comprehensive Site Assessment Addendum Corrective Action Plan. The depth to bedrock is around 27 feet below grade (BG) and the depth to water is roughly 12 feet BG, which would suggest a saturated thickness in the unconfined aquifer of approximately 15 feet. The source zone groundwater data was obtained from the current benzene, toluene, and naphthalene plume data outlined in the 2022 the Semi-Annual Groundwater Monitoring Report. The source 1st order half-life was set to <1 year as the portion of the groundwater plume being modeled is approximately 40 feet from the source area. Therefore, BLE assumes that the effect of petroleum-impacted soil impacting the groundwater contaminant plume in the model area is negligible. 2.2 Predictive Modeling 2.2.1 Intersection with Stanley Creek The BIOSCREEN simulations were run in one-year time steps until the maximum contamination concentration was measured at the predicted plumes intersection with Stanley Creek. The results are summarized in Table 2. In summary, the predictive modeling indicates that benzene in the unconfined aquifer will intersect Stanley Creek in 11 years (2033) at a concentration of 32 g/L. The model predicts that toluene and naphthalene in the unconfined aquifer will intersect Stanley Creek in 25 years (2047) at concentrations of 18.4 g/L and 16.8g/L, respectively. 2.2.2 Predicted Concentrations in Stanley Creek The 7Q10 was estimated for Stanley Creek using an empirical equation sourced from Low-Flow Characteristics of Streams in North Carolina – United States Geological Survey Water-Supply Paper 2403 dated 1993 and prepared by G.L. Giese and Robert R. Mason, Jr. The 7Q10 is defined as the annual minimum 7-day consecutive low flow that on average will be exceeded in 9 out of 10 years. The Site located in the Charlotte Milton Belt, thus, the 7Q10 is quantified as 0.196 x DA0.53, where DA equals the drainage area in square miles. The DA was estimated to be 2.64 square miles using the United States Geological Service (USGS) StreamStats website (see Appendix E). Therefore, the 7Q10 was estimated to be 0.33 cubic feet (ft3) per second or 10.4 million ft3 per year. BLE estimated the flux of contaminated groundwater intersecting Stanley Creek by multiplying the groundwater seepage velocity (1.8 ft/year) by the area or window of groundwater flow estimated to be 15 feet (saturated thickness) multiplied by 25 feet, the estimated width of the contaminated plume at the intersection of Stanley Creek. Therefore, the flux of contaminated groundwater intersecting Stanley Creek is estimated to be 675 ft3per year. Phase I ESA - 455 Mills Gap Road February 9, 2023 Arden, Buncombe County, North Carolina BLE Project No. J22-18805-01 4 of 5 Using a standard mass balance equation, the predicted concentrations of benzene, toluene, and naphthalene in Stanley Creek were estimated to be 0.001 g/L – less than the applicable 2B Standards and/or In-Stream Target for benzene, toluene, and naphthalene. Phase I ESA - 455 Mills Gap Road February 9, 2023 Arden, Buncombe County, North Carolina BLE Project No. J22-18805-01 5 of 5 3.0 CONCLUSIONS BLE performed groundwater modeling using BIOSCREEN software to estimate the potential impacts on Stanley Creek caused by the migration and associated attenuation of the benzene, toluene, and naphthalene groundwater contaminant plumes. The BIOSCREEN results suggest that benzene, toluene, and naphthalene will be significantly less than their 2B Standards and/or In-Stream Target Values in Stanley Creek. Therefore, BLE opines that there is a low potential for the residual petroleum groundwater contaminant plume associated with the Stanley Creek Country Store to adversely impact the nearest surface water receptor, Stanley Creek. Appendix A SGS 2022 Semi-Annual Groundwater Monitoring Report SOUTHEASTERN GEOLOGICAL SERVICES PO Box 441 Shelby, NC 28151 704 481 8558 STANLEY CREEK COUNTRY STORE TRANSMITTAL LETTER The following report is issued in pdf format: -) MO-4603_15573_CA_MRP_20220930.PDF -) Stanley Creek Country Store -) Incident # 15573 -) Semi-Annual Monitoring Report -) 9-30-22 -) Facility ID: 0-015658 Richard Kelly Chief Geologist 1 B. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The AS/SVE system was reactivated October 12, 2007 to remediate the contaminated groundwater onsite. It was deactivated in May 2016. The following wells were sampled August 30, 2022 for this report: WSW-2, WSW-7, MW-2, MW-7, and P-2. The water supply wells and MW-7 remain non-detect. Contaminant levels increased in both MW-2 and P-2. C. TABLE of CONTENTS Section D Site History & Characterization 1 Section E Site Assessment Information 1 Section F Free Product 3 Section G Soil Remediation 3 Section H Groundwater Remediation 3 Section I Conclusions 3 Section J Figures 3 Section K Tables 3 Section L Appendices 3 D. SITE HISTORY and CHARACTERIZATION Stanley Creek Country Store is a former convenience store that sold petroleum products from an underground storage tank system. A release occurred from the system and the groundwater was impacted. The AS/SVE system was activated October 23, 2002 to remediate the contaminated groundwater. It was temporarily shut down in October 2004 and activated October 12, 2007. It was shut down in April 2016 as required by the DENR after reviewing the April 2016 semi- annual monitoring report. E. SITE ASSESSMENT INFORMATION 1.0 WATER SUPPLY WELL SAMPLING 1.1 Sampling Protocol Water supply wells 2 &7 were sampled August 30, 2022. Both wells were sampled from an outside tap after running the water at full strength for ten minutes. The taps were slowed before taking the samples to prevent aeration. The samples were placed in laboratory provided 40 ml vials, fixed with a chain of custody, and placed on ice for shipment between the field and laboratory. They were delivered to PACE Analytical the same day. 2 1.2 Sampling Results The samples were analyzed by methods 6200B and 504.1; no compounds were detected. The analyses are attached. 2.0 MONITOR WELL SAMPLING 2.1 Sampling Protocol Monitor wells 2 &7, and P-2 were sampled with new, disposable bailers after first gauging the wells and then purging three well casing volumes. The samples were taken August 30, 2022 and handled as described above. 2.2 Sampling Results The samples were analyzed by EPA method 6200B and 504.1. Petroleum compounds were detected in MW-2 and P-2. Some compounds were detected above their standard, but all were below their gross contaminant level. The results show that the plume is restricted to the former free product area (MW-2 and P-2). It is also evident that the contaminant levels of the former free product area have been greatly reduced, as all compounds are below their gross contaminated level. A summary follows. MW-2: benzene, xylenes, MTBE, naphthalene, 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene, and EDB > standard, but < GCL, MW-7: non-detect, and P2: benzene, xylenes, naphthalene, n-Propylbenzene, and 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene > standard, but < GCL. A comparison with the last sampling event follows: All compounds increased in both MW-1 and P-2, after substantial decreases from the 8-21 to 3- 22 sampling events.. MW-2: BTEX/MTBE/Naphthalene increase, MW-7: remain non-detect, and P-2: BTEX/MTBE/Naphthalene increase, The analytical results are presented in Table B-4, Table 1 is a historical summary of the sampling results, and the laboratory analysis is attached. Individual BTEX maps are attached; a total BTEX map showing all monitor and remediation wells is also attached. Time/concentration graphs for MW-2 and P-2 are attached. 3.0 CREEK INVESTIGATION The creek was checked and there was no sheen on the creek or emitting from the bank. The area that was investigated is marked on the attached maps. 3 F. FREE PRODUCT – not applicable G. SOIL REMEDIATION – not applicable H. GROUNDWATER REMEDIATION - natural attenuation I. CONCLUSIONS Contaminant levels increased in MW-2 but they are consistent with the last several sampling events. Contaminant levels increased in P-2, continuing the pattern of spring lows and fall highs. Site cleanup has progressed well with the free product removed, concentrations in the former free product area reduced to below gross contaminant levels, and all outlying monitor wells below standard. The sampling shows that the plume remains restricted to MW-2 and P-2. J. FIGURES USGS Topographic Map Water Supply Well Map Site Map Groundwater Flow Map: 8-30-22 Benzene Isoconcentration map Toluene Isoconcentration map Ethylbenzene Isoconcentration map Xylenes Isoconcentration map Total BTEX Isoconcentration map MTBE Isoconcentration map Naphthalene Isoconcentration map K. TABLES Table B-4 Summary of Groundwater Sampling Results Table 1 Historical Groundwater Sampling Table 2 Static Groundwater Levels Table B-9 Static Groundwater Levels: Current and Historical L. APPENDICES Time vs Concentration Graphs: MW-2 & P-2 (both arithmetic and logarithmic scales) Laboratory Analysis and Chain of Custody Table B-4: Summary of Groundwater and Surface Water Sampling Results Revision Date: 9-29-18 Incident Number and Name: 15573 Stanley Creek Country Store Facility ID#: Analytical Method (e.g., VOC by SM6000B) or Field Measurement (FM)6200B 6200B 6200B` 6200B 6200B 6200B 6200B 6200B 6200B 504.1 Contaminant of Concern/ Field MeasurementBenzeneTolueneEthylbenzeneXylenesMTBEIPENaphthalene1,2DCEEDBEDBWell or SW ID Date Collected Sample ID Incident Phase MW-2 8-30-22 MW-2 Monitor 136 489 318 2454 148 5 174 <2.5 <2.5 0.13 MW-7 “ MW-7 “ <1 <1 <1 <2 <1 <1 <2 <1 <1 <.020 P-2 “ P-2 “143 45 376 1125 12 <2.5 156 <2.5 <2.5 <.020 WSW-2 “ WSW-2 “ <1 <1 <1 <2 <1 <1 <2 <1 <1 <.020 WSW-7 “ WSW-7 “ <1 <1 <1 <2 <1 <1 <2 <1 <1 <.020 Minimum Reporting Limit (ug/l) 2L Standard (ug/l)1 600 600 500 20 70 6 0.4 0.02 0.02 GCL (ug/l)5000 260000 84500 85500 20000 70000 6000 400 50 50 NC 2B Standard or EPA National Criteria (ug/l) Results reported in ug/l ug/l =micrograms per liter GCL = gross contamination level 6200B rounded to whole numbers Table B-4: Summary of Groundwater and Surface Water Sampling Results Revision Date: 9-29-18 Incident Number and Name: 15573 Stanley Creek Country Store Facility ID#: Analytical Method (e.g., VOC by SM6000B) or Field Measurement (FM)6200B 6200B 6200B 6200B` 6200B` 6200B 6200B 6200B 3030C Contaminant of Concern/ Field Measurementn-ButlybenzeneSec-ButylbenzeneTert-ButylbenzeneIsopropylbenzenen-PropylbenzeneStyrene1,2,4Trimethylbenzene1,3,5TrimethylbenzeneLeadWell or SW ID Date Collected Sample ID Incident Phase MW-2 8-30-22 MW-2 Monitor <2.5 <2.5 <2.5 15 41 9 531 180 MW-7 “ MW-7 “ <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 P-2 “ P-2 “ <2.5 <2.5 <2.5 26 78 <2.5 680 193 WSW-2 “ WSW-2 “ <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 WSW-7 “ WSW-7 “ <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 Minimum Reporting Limit (ug/l) 2L Standard (ug/l)70 70 70 70 70 70 400 400 15 GCL (ug/l)6900 8500 15000 25000 30000 70000 28500 25000 15000 NC 2B Standard or EPA National Criteria (ug/l) Results reported in ug/l ug/l =micrograms per liter GCL = gross contamination level 6200B rounded to whole numbers Benzene Toluene Ethylb.Xylenes BTEX MTBE IPE Naphthalene Standard 1 29 600 500 20 70 21 GCL 5000 29000 29000 87500 20000 70000 15500 MW-2 1998-12 Free Product 2001-3 Free Product 2002-11 Free Product 2003-3 Free Product 2003-6 Free Product 2003-8 Free Product 2004-3 Free Product 2004-9 6500 34000 2100 15300 57900 1600 830 2007-7 325 310 149 537 1321 122 133 2008-3 3715 3878 1795 6290 15678 45 122 2008-9 4120 8500 2030 22570 37220 1070 <200 1280 2009-3 1470 5610 1030 5960 14070 360 <200 730 2009-9 1120 1890 575 2910 6495 397 19 660 2010-4 566 2480 548 3040 6634 218 9 329 2010-9 1110 4300 1040 6890 13340 328 <25 465 2011-3 1170 4360 950 5980 12460 411 <25 334 2011-10 782 3810 1670 9100 15362 358 <13 939 2012-3 833 3450 976 5160 10419 449 <13 675 2012-9 550 3140 719 4110 8519 301 <10 335 2013-3 50 88 66 1026 1230 15 <2 100 2013-10 284 2470 461 2370 5585 202 5 211 2014-3 211 1880 379 2770 5240 182 <10 199 2014-9 299 2680 616 3720 7315 237 <6 238 2015-3 379 2810 717 4270 8176 292 <10 307 2015-9 183 664 309 1486 2642 149 4 173 2016-3 270 2030 460 3050 5810 214 <10 244 Benzene Toluene Ethylb.Xylenes BTEX MTBE IPE Naphthalene Standard 1 29 600 500 20 70 21 GCL 5000 29000 29000 87500 20000 70000 15500 MW-2 2016-9 151 554 326 1592 2623 158 5 274 2017-3 284 2170 540 4410 7404 632 <10 375 2017-9 230 1590 484 3290 5594 218 6 325 2018-2 247 1480 468 4160 6355 240 7 349 2018-9 71 76 19 989 1155 3 <1 65 2019-2 405 2810 1000 7000 11215 339 <13 456 2019-9 9 1520 1270 3670 6469 <2 <2 201 2020-3 229 1020 561 3220 5030 212 7 254 2020-8 195 605 542 2473 3815 141 6 285 2021-3 105 542 311 1978 2936 124 3 131 2021-9 110 250 310 1310 1980 86 3 130 2022-3 47 130 174 790 1141 40 1 108 2022-8 136 489 318 2454 3397 148 5 174 Benzene Toluene Ethtlb.Xylenes BETX MTBE IPE Naphthalene Standard 1 29 600 500 20 70 21 GCL 5000 29000 29000 87500 20000 70000 15500 MW-7 1996-8 90 <1 <1 4 94 240 16 1998-12 2 <1 <1 <2 2 52 2 2001-3 Free Product 2002-11 Free Product 2003-3 Free Product 2003-6 Free Product 2003-8 Free Product 2004-3 Free Product 2004-9 <100 110 <100 2180 >2290 <100 <100 2007-7 <5 949 454 2418 3821 25 29 2008-3 <1 <1 3 15 18 <1 <1 2008-9 <5 12 <5 179 191 <5 <5 24 2009-3 <1 <1 <1 <2 <1 <1 <1 <2 2009-9 41 146 68 269 524 6 2 29 2010-4 1 1 4 14 20 <1 <1 <2 2010-9 3 23 18 87 131 1 <1 11 2011-3 <1 <1 <1 <2 <2 <1 <1 <2 2011-10 1 1 <1 10 12 1 <1 6 2012-3 <1 <1 <1 <2 <2 <1 <1 <2 2012-9 <1 <1 <1 <2 <2 <1 <1 <2 2013-3 <1 <1 <1 <2 <2 <1 <1 <2 2013-10 <1 <1 <1 <2 <2 <1 <1 <2 2014-3 <1 1 <1 <2 <2 <1 <1 <2 2014-9 <1 <1 <1 <2 <2 <1 <1 <2 2015-3 <1 <1 <1 <2 <2 <1 <1 <2 2015-9 <1 <1 <1 <2 <2 <1 <1 <2 2016-3 <1 <1 <1 <2 <2 <1 <1 <2 Benzene Toluene Ethtlb.Xylenes BETX MTBE IPE Naphthalene Standard 1 29 600 500 20 70 21 GCL 5000 29000 29000 87500 20000 70000 15500 MW-7 2016-9 <1 <1 <1 <2 <2 <1 <1 <2 2017-3 <1 <1 <1 <2 <2 <1 <1 <2 2017-9 <1 <1 <1 <2 <2 <1 <1 <2 2018-2 <1 <1 <1 <2 <2 <1 <1 <2 2018-9 <1 <1 <1 <2 <2 <1 <1 <2 2019-2 <1 <1 <1 <2 <2 <1 <1 <2 2019-9 <1 <1 <1 <2 <2 <1 <1 <2 2020-3 <1 <1 <1 <2 <2 <1 <1 <2 2020-8 <1 <1 <1 <2 <2 <1 <1 <2 2021-3 <1 <1 <1 <2 <2 <1 <1 <2 2021-9 <1 <1 <1 <2 <2 <1 <1 <2 2022-3 <1 <1 <1 <2 <2 <1 <1 <2 2022-8 <1 <1 <1 <2 <2 <1 <1 <2 Benzene Toluene Ethtlb.Xylenes BETX MTBE IPE Naphthalene Standard 1 29 600 500 20 70 21 GCL 5000 29000 29000 87500 20000 70000 15500 P2 1998-12 Free Product 2001-3 Free Product 2002-11 Free Product 2003-3 Free Product 2003-6 Free Product 2003-8 Free Product 2004-3 Free Product 2004-9 4700 11000 2400 11900 30000 1500 290 2007-7 417 309 185 612 1523 260 164 2008-3 512 2448 854 6214 10028 <20 81 2008-9 2740 4200 1540 23150 31630 <200 <200 1380 2009-3 <200 1190 904 5710 7804 <200 <200 <200 2009-9 236 1070 502 2545 4353 <5 <5 216 2010-4 192 4410 3100 16080 23782 <50 <50 974 2010-9 230 2100 3110 19800 25240 <25 <25 2120 2011-3 97 2070 1430 8970 12567 <50 <50 586 2011-10 87 2220 2630 14470 19407 <10 <10 1410 2012-3 75 946 1860 8900 11781 <13 <13 1330 2012-9 92 536 712 3226 4556 <3 <3 306 2013-3 244 1870 315 2491 4920 154 <5 163 2013-10 40 203 221 1129 1593 <1 <1 <2 2014-3 19 108 117 825 1069 <1 <1 71 2014-9 90 337 423 2070 2920 <1 <1 157 2015-3 14 64 108 445 631 <3 <3 54 2015-9 135 247 387 1855 2624 4 <1 150 2016-3 46 139 206 1183 1574 2 <3 103 Benzene Toluene Ethtlb.Xylenes BETX MTBE IPE Naphthalene Standard 1 29 600 500 20 70 21 GCL 5000 29000 29000 87500 20000 70000 15500 P-2 2016-9 113 235 797 4700 5845 <6 <6 749 2017-3 38 115 423 3131 3707 265 <6 899 2017-9 95 108 157 1346 1706 11 <5 259 2018-2 8 33 142 820 1003 <1 <1 128 2018-9 96 102 24 1383 1605 5 <3 96 2019-2 54 44 180 722 1000 <3 <3 100 2019-9 173 4 111 9 297 12 <2 625 2020-3 34 24 118 374 550 <1 <1 58 2020-8 108 71 248 725 1152 4 <1 79 2021-3 15 21 131 546 713 <1 <1 113 2021-9 160 52 260 818 1290 14 1 61 2022-3 4 4 32 144 184 <1 <1 25 2022-8 143 45 376 1125 2666 12 <2.5 156 TABLE 2 Static Groundwater Levels 3/15/2022 wellhead level static MW-1 100 9.44 90.56 MW-2 100.24 10.05 90.19 MW-3 97.91 8.39 89.52 MW-4 97.54 8.06 89.48 MW-5 101.24 10.05 91.19 MW-6 95.68 6.91 88.77 MW-7 98.09 8.55 89.54 P-2 99.27 9.29 89.98 VMW-1 99.9 Table B-9: Current and Historical Groundwater Elevations and Free Product Thickness Revision Date: 2-6-19 Incident Number and Name: 15573 Stanley Creek Country Store Facility ID#: Well ID #Date Screened Interval (top of screen, bottom of screen) Depth to Water* Uncorrected (feet) Free Product Thickness (feet) Depth to Water* Corrected for Free Product Thickness(feet) Top of Casing Elevation (MSL) Groundwater Surface Elevation (MSL) MW-2 8-30-22 ? - ?0 10.05 100.24 90.19 3-15-22 0 9.83 90.41 9-15-21 0 10.25 89.99 3-23-21 0 9.48 90.76 8-11-20 0 9.75 90.49 3-17-20 0 9.97 90.27 9-16-19 0 10.46 89.78 2-6-19 0 9.35 90.89 9-14-18 -0 10.01 90.23 9-22-17 -0 9.68 90.56 3-17 -0 9.75 90.49 9-14-16 -0 10.22 90.02 9-14-15 -0 9.73 90.51 MW-2 9-15-14 ? - ?0 8.43 100.24 91.81 “ 10-8-13 0 8.65 91.59 “ 3-24-14 0 7.93 92.31 *Depth to Water is measured from Top of Casing Table B-9: Current and Historical Groundwater Elevations and Free Product Thickness Revision Date: 2-6-19 Incident Number and Name: 15573 Stanley Creek Country Store Facility ID#: Well ID #Date Screened Interval (top of screen, bottom of screen) Depth to Water* Uncorrected (feet) Free Product Thickness (feet) Depth to Water* Corrected for Free Product Thickness(feet) Top of Casing Elevation (MSL) Groundwater Surface Elevation (MSL) MW-7 8-30-22 ? - ?0 8.55 98.09 89.54 3-15-22 0 8.24 89.85 9-15-21 0 8.68 89.41 3.23-21 0 8.03 90.06 8-11-20 0 8.28 89.81 3-17-20 0 8.49 89.60 9-16-19 0 8.85 89.24 2-16-19 0 8.47 89.62 9-14-18 -0 8.08 90.01 9-22-17 -0 8.13 89.96 3-17 -0 8.30 89.79 9-14-16 -0 8.67 89.42 MW-7 9-14-15 ? - ?0 8.20 98.09 89.89 9-15-14 -0 6.87 91.22 10-8-13 0 7.20 90.89 3-24-14 0 6.47 91.62 Table B-9: Current and Historical Groundwater Elevations and Free Product Thickness Revision Date: 2-6-19 Incident Number and Name: 15573 Stanley Creek Country Store Facility ID#: Well ID #Date Screened Interval (top of screen, bottom of screen) Depth to Water* Uncorrected (feet) Free Product Thickness (feet) Depth to Water* Corrected for Free Product Thickness(feet) Top of Casing Elevation (MSL) Groundwater Surface Elevation (MSL) P-2 8-30-22 ? - ?0 9.29 99.27 89.98 3-15-22 0 9.03 90.24 9-15-21 0 9.43 89.84 3-23-21 0 8.65 90.62 8-11-20 0 8.91 90.36 3-17-20 0 9.15 90.12 9-16-19 0 9.65 89.62 2-6-19 0 8.81 90.46 9-14-18 -0 8.75 90.52 9-22-17 -0 8.80 90.47 3-17 -0 8.89 90.38 9-14-16 -0 9.42 89.85 9-14-15 -0 8.85 90.42 P-2 9-15-14 ? - ?0 7.58 99.27 91.69 10-8-13 0 7.84 91.43 3-24-14 0 7.19 92.08 *Depth to Water is measured from Top of Casing 0 10000 20000 30000 40000 50000 60000 70000 2004-92007-72008-32008-92009-32009-92010-42010-92011-32011-102012-22012-92013-32013-102014-32014-92015-32015-92016-32016-92017-32017-92018-22018-92019-22019-92020-32020-82021-32021-92022-32022-8MW-2 B E T X MTBE 1 10 100 1000 10000 100000 2004-92007-72008-32008-92009-32009-92010-42010-92011-32011-102012-22012-92013-32013-102014-32014-92015-32015-92016-32016-92017-32017-92018-22018-92019-22019-92020-32020-82021-32021-92022-32022-8MW-2 B E T X MTBE 0 5000 10000 15000 20000 25000 2004-92007-72008-32008-92009-32009-92010-42010-92011-32011-102012-32012-92013-32013-102014-32014-92015-32015-92016-32016-92017-32017-92018-22018-92019-22019-92020-32020-82021-32021-92022-32022-8P2 B E T X MTBE 1 10 100 1000 10000 100000 2004-92007-72008-32008-92009-32009-92010-42010-92011-32011-102012-32012-92013-32013-102014-32014-92015-32015-92016-32016-92017-32017-92018-22018-92019-22019-92020-32020-82021-32021-92022-32022-8P2 B E T X MTBE Appendix B Tables 1. Hydrogeology Value Units Comments Seepage Velocity 1.8 feet/year Sourced from CSA Addendum CAP dated May 28, 1998 prepared by Southeastern Geological Services. Average of seepage velocity measured at PTW-2 and MW-7. 2. Dispersion Longitudinal Dispersivity 10.0 feet Calculated by BIOSCREEN using the Estimated Plume Length Transverse Dispersivity 1 feet Calculated by BIOSCREEN using the Estimated Plume Length Vertical Dispersivity 0 feet Default Estimated Plume Length 170 feet Measured plume length 3. Adsorption Retardation Factor 1 Conservative estimation or Soil Bulk Density Not used kg/L Partition Coefficient Not used L/kg FractionOrganicCarbon Not used unitless 4. Biodegration Benzene 1st Order Decay Coefficient 0.18 per year Calculated by BIOSCREEN using the Solute Half-Life or Solute Half-Life 3.8000 year Calculated using the first order decay coefficient from the first order decay equation discussed in Section 7.1. Toluene 1st Order Decay Coefficient 0.18 per year Calculated by BIOSCREEN using the Solute Half-Life or Solute Half-Life 3.80 year Calculated using the first order decay coefficient from the first order decay equation discussed in Section 7.1. FractionOrganicCarbon Not used unitless Naphthalene 1st Order Decay Coefficient 0.11 per year Calculated by BIOSCREEN using the Solute Half-Life or Solute Half-Life 6.33 year Calculated using the first order decay coefficient from the first order decay equation discussed in Section 7.1. FractionOrganicCarbon Not used unitless 5. General Modeled Area Length 100 feet Length of model space to be viewed in the output. Modeled Area Width 25 feet Width of model space to be viewed in the output Simulation Time Various years Model ran in 1 year time steps identifying the maximum contaminant concentration in groundwater at its intersection with Stanley Creek. 6. Source Data Source Thickness 27 feet Unconfined aquifer thickness sourced CSA Addendum CAP dated May 28, 1998 prepared by Southeastern Geological Services. Source Zone (benzene)0.143 mg/L Sourced from Semi-Annual Monitoring Report dated September 30, 2022 prepared by Southeastern Geological Services. Source Zone (toluene)0.489 mg/L Sourced from Semi-Annual Monitoring Report dated September 30, 2022 prepared by Southeastern Geological Services. Source Zone (naphthalene)0.174 mg/L Sourced from Semi-Annual Monitoring Report dated September 30, 2022 prepared by Southeastern Geological Services. Source Halflife (Inst. React.)Not used years Source Halflife (1st Order)<1 years Simulates little to no benzene, toluene, and naphthalene in soil cm/sec = centimeter per second kg/L = kilograms per liter L/kg = liters per kilogram mg/L = milligrams per liter Table 1 - Summary of BIOSCREEN Input Data Stanley Creek Country Store, Incident 15573 236 Mauney Road Stanley, Gaston County, North Carolina BLE Project No. 19484-01 Benzene Toluene Naphthalene Benzene Toluene Naphthalene 11 32 0.001 25 18.4 16.8 0.001 0.001 NCAC 2B 1.19 11 NA In-Stream Target NA NA 400 1Predicted contaminant concentration at the intersection with Stanley Creek mg/L = micrograms per liter NCAC 2B = North Carolina 15A NCAC 02B Water Quality Standards for Surface Waters In-Stream Target = North Carolina In-Stream Target Values for Surface Waters Stanley Creek is classified as WS-IV NA = Not applicable BIOSCREEN Output1 (mg/L)Time (years) Stanley Creek Result Following Mixing (mg/L) Table 2 - Summary of BIOSCREEN Output and Mixing Results Stanley Creek Country Store, Incident 15573 236 Mauney Road Stanley, Gaston County, North Carolina BLE Project No. 19484-01 Appendix C BIOSCREEN Inputs Appendix D First Order Decay Coefficients Analysis y = 5E+11e-5E-04x R² = 0.5993 0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 3,500 4,000 4,500 5,000 37,000 38,000 39,000 40,000 41,000 42,000 43,000 44,000 45,000 46,000Benzene Concentration in Micrograms per LiterDays PTW-2 Benzene Concentration Vs. Time Half-life = 0.693/5E-04 = 3.79 y = 3E+11e-5E-04x R² = 0.5742 0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 30,000 35,000 40,000 37,000 38,000 39,000 40,000 41,000 42,000 43,000 44,000 45,000 46,000Toluene Concentration in Micrograms per LiterDays PTW-2 Toluene Concentration Vs. Time Half-life = 0.693/5E-04 = 3.79 y = 2E+07e-3E-04x R² = 0.4224 0 200 400 600 800 1,000 1,200 1,400 39,000 40,000 41,000 42,000 43,000 44,000 45,000 46,000Naphthalene Concentration in Micrograms per LiterDays MW-2 Naphthalene Concentration Vs. Time Half-life = 0.693/3E-04 = 6.33 Appendix E BIOSCREEN Output DISSOLVED HYDROCARBON CONCENTRATION ALONG PLUME CENTERLINE (mg/L at Z=0) Benzene Distance from Source (ft) TYPE OF MODEL 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 No Degradation 0.000 0.002 0.062 0.035 0.017 0.006 0.002 0.001 0.000 0.000 0.000 1st Order Decay 0.000 0.002 0.032 0.014 0.005 0.002 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Inst. Reaction 0.000 0.002 0.062 0.035 0.017 0.006 0.002 0.001 0.000 0.000 0.000 Field Data from Site Time: 11 YearsNext Timestep Prev Timestep Calculate Animation Recalculate This 0.000 0.010 0.020 0.030 0.040 0.050 0.060 0.070 0 20 40 60 80 100 120Concentration(mg/L)Distance From Source (ft) 1st Order Decay Instantaneous Reaction No Degradation Field Data from Site Return to DISSOLVED HYDROCARBON CONCENTRATION ALONG PLUME CENTERLINE (mg/L at Z=0) Toluene Distance from Source (ft) TYPE OF MODEL 0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315 360 405 450 No Degradation 0.000 0.158 0.016 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 1st Order Decay 0.000 0.0184 0.001 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Inst. Reaction 0.000 0.158 0.016 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Field Data from Site Time: 25 YearsNext Timestep Prev Timestep Calculate Animation Recalculate This 0.000 0.020 0.040 0.060 0.080 0.100 0.120 0.140 0.160 0.180 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500Concentration(mg/L)Distance From Source (ft) 1st Order Decay Instantaneous Reaction No Degradation Field Data from Site Return to DISSOLVED HYDROCARBON CONCENTRATION ALONG PLUME CENTERLINE (mg/L at Z=0) Naphthalene Distance from Source (ft) TYPE OF MODEL 0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315 360 405 450 No Degradation 0.000 0.064 0.007 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 1st Order Decay 0.000 0.0168 0.001 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Inst. Reaction 0.000 0.064 0.007 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Field Data from Site Time: 25 YearsNext Timestep Prev Timestep Calculate Animation Recalculate This 0.000 0.010 0.020 0.030 0.040 0.050 0.060 0.070 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500Concentration(mg/L)Distance From Source (ft) 1st Order Decay Instantaneous Reaction No Degradation Field Data from Site Return to Appendix F StreamStats Report StreamStats Report Collapse All   Basin Characteristics Parameter Code Parameter Description Value Unit DRNAREA Area that drains to a point on a stream 2.64 square miles USGS Data Disclaimer: Unless otherwise stated, all data, metadata and related materials are considered to satisfy the quality standards relative to the purpose for which the data were collected. Although these data and associated metadata have been reviewed for accuracy and completeness and approved for release by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), no warranty expressed or implied is made regarding the display or utility of the data for other purposes, nor on all computer systems, nor shall the act of distribution constitute any such warranty. USGS Software Disclaimer: This software has been approved for release by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS). Although the software has been subjected to rigorous review, the USGS reserves the right to update the software as needed pursuant to further analysis and review. No warranty, expressed or implied, is made by the USGS or the U.S. Government as to the functionality of the software and related material nor shall the fact of release constitute any such warranty. Furthermore, the software is released on condition that neither the USGS nor the U.S. Government shall be held liable for any damages resulting from its authorized or unauthorized use. USGS Product Names Disclaimer: Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Application Version: 4.13.0 StreamStats Services Version: 1.2.22 NSS Services Version: 2.2.1 Region ID:NC Workspace ID:NC20230213202523027000 Clicked Point (Latitude, Longitude):35.35827, -81.11755 Time:2023-02-13 15:24:18 -0500  