The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About22019_Cone Mill-Grsboro_Pruning Perfection_EMP_20230419NORTH CAROLINA BROWNFIELDS PROGRAM ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN This form is to be used to prepare an Environmental Management Plan (EMP) for projects in the North Carolina Brownfields Program at the direction of a Brownfields project manager. The EMP is a typical requirement of a Brownfields Agreement (BFA). Its purpose is to clarify actions to be taken during the demolition and construction at Brownfields properties in an effort to avoid delays in the event of the discovery of new contamination sources or other environmental conditions. The EMP provides a means to document redevelopment plans and environmental data for each applicable environmental medium to inform regulatory -compliant decision -making at the site. As much detail as possible should be included in the EMP, including contingency planning for unknowns. Consult your project manager if you have questions. Prospective Developers and/or their consultants must complete and submit this form and all pertinent attachments, see checklist below, to their Brownfields project manager prior to any earthmoving or other development -related activities that have the potential to disturb soil at the Brownfields Property, including demolition. For the resultant EMP to be valid for use, it must be completed, reviewed by the program, signed by all parties working on the project, and approved by the Brownfields project manager. Failure to comply with the requirements of the EMP could jeopardize project eligibility, or in the event of a completed agreement, be cause for a reopener. The EMP is valid only for the scope of work described herein and must be updated to be applicable for new phases of redevelopment or after significant changes in applicable regulatory guidance. Voluntary Metrics Tab The NC Brownfields Program updates estimated capital investment (from the Brownfields Property Application) and estimated jobs created (from the Brownfields Agreement) whenever possible. As a voluntary measure, you may opt to complete the below information for capital investment and jobs created as estimated by your final redevelopment plans for the Brownfields Property: 1. Estimated capital investment in redevelopment project: $55,000 2. Estimated jobs created: a. Construction Jobs: None b. Full Time Post -Redevelopment Jobs: 1-2 EMP Version 2, January 2021 Table of Contents NORTH CAROLINA BROWNFIELDS PROGRAM ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN ........................... 1 GENERAL INFORMATION........................................................................................................................ 4 COMMUNICATIONS................................................................................................................................ 4 NOTIFICATIONS TO THE BROWNFIELDS PROGRAM............................................................................... 5 REDEVELOPMENT PLANS........................................................................................................................ 6 CONTAMINATED MEDIA......................................................................................................................... 8 PART1. Soil......................................................................................................................................... 8 PART 2. GROUNDWATER................................................................................................................. 16 PART 3. SURFACE WATER.................................................................................................................. 17 PART 4. SEDIMENT............................................................................................................................ 18 PARTS. SOIL VAPOR......................................................................................................................... 18 PART 6. SUB -SLAB SOIL VAPOR........................................................................................................ 19 PART 7. INDOOR AIR......................................................................................................................... 19 VAPOR INTRUSION MITIGATION SYSTEM............................................................................................. 20 CONTINGENCY PLAN — encountering unknown tanks, drums, or other waste materials ..................... 20 POST -REDEVELOPMENT REPORTING..................................................................................................... 22 APPROVAL SIGNATURES....................................................................................................................... 24 2 EMP Version 2, January 2021 So that the EMP provides value in protecting brownfields eligibility and public health, the preparer shall ensure that the following steps have been completed prior to submitting the EMP for review. Any EMP prepared without completing these steps is premature. ® Site sampling and assessment that meets Brownfields' objectives is complete and has been reviewed and approved by the Brownfields Project Manager. ® Specific redevelopment plans, even if conceptual, have been developed for the project, submitted and reviewed by the Brownfields Project Manager. Please submit, along with the completed EMP form, the following attachments, as relevant and applicable to the proposed redevelopment: ® A set of redevelopment plans, including architectural/engineering plans, if available; if not conceptual plans may suffice if updated when detailed plans are drafted. ® A figure overlaying redevelopment plans on a map of the extent of contamination for each media. ❑ Site grading plans that include a cut and fill analysis. ® A figure showing the proposed location and depth of impacted soil that would remain on site after construction grading. ❑ Any necessary permits for redevelopment (i.e. demolition, etc.). ❑ A detailed construction schedule that includes timing and phases of construction. **PD NOTE: a detailed construction schedule does not exist to attach. The installation will begin at least 10 days following EMP approval and will depend on contractor availability and DEQ approval timing. There is no "GC" for this project as the work is limited.** ® Tabulated data summaries for each impacted media (i.e. soil, groundwater, soil gas, etc.) applicable to the proposed redevelopment. ® Figures with the sampling locations and contamination extents for each impacted media applicable to the proposed redevelopment. ❑ A full final grade sampling and analysis plan, if the redevelopment plan is final. ❑ If known, information about each proposed potential borrow soil source, such as aerial photos, historic site maps, historic Sanborn maps, a site history, necessary for brownfields approval. EMP Version 2, January 2021 ❑ Information and, analytical data if required, for quarries, or other borrow sources, detailing the type of material proposed for importation to the Brownfields Property. ❑ A work plan for the sampling and analysis of soil to be brought onto the Brownfields Property. Refer to Issue Resolution 15 in Brownfields Program Guidelines. ❑ A map of the Brownfields Property showing the location of soils proposed for export and sampling data from those areas. ❑ If a Vapor Mitigation System is required by the Brownfields Program, the Vapor Intrusion Mitigation System (VIMS) plan will be signed and sealed by a NC Professional Engineer. The VIMS Plan may also be submitted under separate cover. GENERAL INFORMATION Date: 4/10/2023 Revision Date (if applicable): :lick or tap to enter a date. Brownfields Assigned Project Name: Cone Mill - Greensboro Brownfields Project Number: 22019-18-041 Brownfields Property Address: 1701/1707 Fairview Street, Greensboro, Guilford County, NC (Parcel 7875163235) Brownfields Property Area (acres): 2.96 Is Brownfields Property Subject to RCRA Permit? ....................... ❑ Yes ® No If yes enter Permit No.: Click or tap here to enter text. Is Brownfields Property Subject to a Solid Waste Permit ............ ❑ Yes ® No If yes, enter Permit No.: Click or tap here to enter text. COMMUNICATIONS A copy of this EMP shall be distributed to all the parties below as well as any contractors or site workers that may be exposed to site vapors, soil, groundwater, and/or surface water. Additionally, a copy of the EMP shall be maintained at the Brownfields Property during redevelopment activities. NOTE, THE EMP DOES NOT TAKE THE PLACE OF A SITE -SPECIFIC HEALTH AND SAFETY PLAN. Prospective Developer (PD): Pruning Perfection and Landscape, LLC Contact Person: Jonathan Hein Phone Numbers: Office: 336-312-9344 Mobile: Click or tap here to enter text. Email: jonchein@gmail.com EMP Version 2, January 2021 Fence Contractor for PD: Diversified Fence Buildings Contact Person: Greg Gainer Phone Numbers: Office: 336.347.1702 Mobile: 336-230-8535 Email: ggainer@diversifiedfence.com Contractor for PD Vega Metal Structures Contact Person: Lesly Pacheco Phone Numbers: Office: 336.799.4416 Mobile: 336.799.4416 Email: Vmstructures6lC@email.com Environmental Consultant: Geosyntec Consultants of NC, P.C. Contact Person: Kaitlyn Rhonehouse Phone Numbers: Office: 910.372.6402 Mobile: 561.866.0057 Email: krhonehouse@geosyntec.com Brownfields Program Project Manager: Tyler B Pearson Phone Numbers: Office: 336.776.9741 Mobile: 336.528.0027 Email: tyler.pearson@ncdenr.gov Other DEQ Program Contacts (if applicable, i.e., UST Section, Inactive Hazardous Site Branch, Hazardous Waste, Solid Waste): Click or tap here to enter text. NOTIFICATIONS TO THE BROWNFIELDS PROGRAM Written advance Notification Times to Brownfields Project Manager: Check each box to accept minimum advance notice periods (in calendar days) for each type of onsitetask: On -site assessment or remedial activities: .................................................... 10 days Prior Construction or grading start: .......................................................................... 10 days Prior Discovery of stained soil, odors, USTs, buried drums or waste, landfill, or other signs of previously unknown contamination: ................................................................................ Within 48 hours Implementation of emergency actions (e.g. dewatering, flood or soil erosion control measures in area of contamination, ventilation of work zones): ................................... Within 48 hours Installation of mitigation systems: ................................................................ 10 days Prior IK Other notifications as required by local, state or federal agencies to implement redevelopment activities: (as applicable): ................................................................................. Within 30 days 5 EMP Version 2, January 2021 REDEVELOPMENT PLANS 1) Type of Redevelopment (check all that apply): ❑Residential ❑Recreational El Institutional ®Commercial ❑Office ❑Retail ❑ Industrial ❑Other specify: Click or tap here to enter text. 2) Check the following activities that will be conducted prior to commencing earth -moving activities at the site: ® Review of historic maps (Sanborn Maps, facility maps) ❑ Conducting geophysical surveys to evaluate the location of suspect UST, fuel lines, utility lines, etc. ® Interviews with employees/former employees/facility managers/neighbors 3) Summary of Redevelopment Plans (MANDATORY: attach detailed plans or conceptual plans, if detailed plans are not available. EMP review without such information would be premature): Provide brief summary of redevelopment plans, including demolition, removal of building slabs/pavement, grading plans and planned construction of new structures: This EMP covers only parcel 7875163235, a portion of the Brownfields property, which has been sold to the PD listed above. This parcel is outside of the former building/manufacturing area. The northern/western portion of the parcel is paved with asphalt/gravel (shown in yellow on Figure 3); the remainder of the parcel is unpaved and heavily vegetated. These two areas are separated by a concrete wall. The natural area will not be disturbed. The entire parcel has not been used since the BFA was filed. Two samples were collected in the locations shown on Figure 2 in 2018 at depths from 9 to 13 ft bgs; the soil data tables are also attached. Soil samples identified arsenic above the residential PSRG but not the industrial/commercial PSRG and elevated detection limits (no detections) for hexavalent chromium. No groundwater or soil gas testing appears to have been performed on this parcel as it is not the location where former textile operations were conducted and not previously developed. The redevelopment consists of construction of an equipment storage building, installation of fencing/fence posts, and utility trenching/installation as part of a landscaping business (locations shown on Figure 3). The areas to be disturbed coincide with the features shown on the figure, with the fencing and utilities being linear features. Building options are still being evaluated to include only % enclosed buildings which may be installed slab on grab or with shallow footers (an example sized building with shallow footers is attached —this exact building type or all features [e.g., garage doors] may not be used). No enclosed buildings will be constructed/occupied without approval from DEQ that vapor intrusion risks have been properly evaluated. Only shallow soil disturbance will be performed for footer installation (<2 ft) and fence posts. Utility installation would be performed at depths appropriate for the utility, but no anticipated depth EMP Version 2, January 2021 greater than 5 ft. Well construction logs from 2016 reported groundwater at depths ranging from 1.81 to 12.42 ft below top of casing. Previously installed wells were not surveyed; therefore, flow direction is not known, however, we project flow to be northerly towards the adjacent Buffalo Creek, indicating the Site parcel is cross -gradient from the contaminated portion of the Brownfields Property (located to the east). None of the contaminants known to be present in the environmental media at the Brownfields Property, as described in Exhibit 2 of the Notice, will be used or stored at the Brownfields Property without the prior written approval of DEQ, except in de minimis quantities for cleaning and other routine housekeeping and maintenance activities, or in onboard tanks in vehicles or landscaping equipment. Materials stored on -site will include plants (outside), de minimis quantities of herbicides, pesticides, gasoline, and oil (under cover), and hardscaping material such as block, gravel, mulch, and pipe. The "driveway" providing access to the property through the proposed fence is also shown on Figure 3. The remainder of the asphalt -paved areas outside of the driveway and building will be available for parking. 4) Do plans include demolition of structure(s)?: ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown ❑ If yes, please check here to confirm that demolition will be conducted in accordance with applicable legal requirements, including without limitation those related to lead and asbestos abatement that are administered by the Health Hazards Control Unit within the Division of Public Health of the North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services. If available, please provide a copy of your demolition permit. 5) Are sediment and erosion control measures required by federal, state, or local regulations? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown ❑ If yes, please check here to confirm that demolition will be conducted in accordance with applicable legal requirements. If soil disturbance is necessary to install sediment and erosion control measures, they may not begin until this EMP is approved. 6) Which category of risk -based screening level is used or is anticipated to be specified in the Brownfields Agreement? Note: If children frequent the property, residential screening levels shall be cited in the Brownfields Agreement for comparison purposes. ❑ Residential ® Non -Residential or Industrial/Commercial 7) Schedule for Redevelopment (attach construction schedule): a) Construction start date: At least 10 days after EMP approval b) Anticipated duration (specify activities during each phase): Approximately one month c) Additional phases planned? ® Yes ❑ No If yes, specify the start date and/or activities if known: Utility installation schedule is EMP Version 2, January 2021 unknown. This could include underground water, sewer, and/or electric lines depending on future building needs. Start Date: unknown Planned Activity: Utility installation date unknown. This could include underground water, sewer, and/or electric lines depending on future needs. Start Date: Click or tap to enter a date. Planned Activity: Click or tap here to enter text. Start Date: ick or tap to enter a date. Planned Activity: Click or tap here to enter text d) Provide the planned date of occupancy for new buildings: N/A CONTAMINATED MEDIA Please fill out the sections below, using detailed site plans, if available, or estimate using known areas of contaminated soil and a conceptual redevelopment plan. Provide a figure overlaying new construction onto figure showing contaminated soil and groundwater locations. 1) Contaminated Media on the Brownfields Property Part 1. Soil: .............................................................. ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Suspected ❑ Unknown Part 2. Groundwater: ............................................ ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Suspected ® Unknown Part 3. Surface Water: .......................................... ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Suspected ❑ Unknown Part 4. Sediment: ................................................... ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Suspected ❑ Unknown Part 5. Soil Vapor: .................................................. ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Suspected ® Unknown Part 6. Sub -Slab Soil Vapor: .................................. ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Suspected ® Unknown Part 7. Indoor Air: ................................................... ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Suspected ® Unknown 2) For the Area of Proposed Redevelopment on the Brownfields Property, attach tabulated data summaries for each impacted media and figure(s) with sample locations. PART 1. Soil 1) Known or suspected contaminants in soil (list general groups of contaminants): 2 soil samples were collected on this parcel in 2018 at depths from 9 to 13 ft bgs. Only arsenic exceeded the residential PSRG (below industrial/commercial). The samples also had elevated detection limits for hexavalent chromium. Hexavalent chromium was not detected in any 8 EMP Version 2, January 2021 Brownfields Property samples. The source is attributed to background concentrations. 2) Depth of known or suspected contaminants (feet): 9-13 feet 3) Area of soil disturbed by redevelopment (square feet): 1,500 SF 4) Depths of soil to be excavated (feet): 0-5 ft (estimated) 5) Estimated volume of soil (cubic yards) to be excavated (attach grading plan): Fence: 5 posts: 0.003 CY Building: 4 footers: 0.07 CY -160 feet utility trenching: 120 CY 6) Estimated volume of excavated soil (cubic yards) anticipated to be impacted by contaminants: 0 7) Estimated volume of contaminated soil expected to be disposed of offsite, if applicable: 0 Part I.A. MANAGING ONSITE SOIL If soil is anticipated to be excavated fromthe Brownfield Property, relocated on the Brownfields Property, or otherwise disturbed during site grading or other redevelopment activities, please provide a grading plan that clearly illustrates areas of cut and fill (approximate areas & volumes are acceptable, if only preliminarydata available). 1) HAZARDOUS WASTE DETERMINATION: a) Does the soil contain a LISTED WASTE as defined in the North Carolina Hazardous Waste Section under 40 CFR Part 261.31-261.35?....................................... ❑Yes ®No ❑ If yes, explain why below, including the level of knowledge regarding processes generating the waste (include pertinent analytical results as needed). :lick or tap here to enter text. ❑ If yes, do the soils exceed the "Contained -Out" levels in Attachment 1 of the North Carolina Contained -In Policy? ................................................. ❑ Yes ® No b) NOTE: IF SOIL MEETS THE DEFINITION OF A LISTED HAZARDOUS WASTE AND EXCEEDS THE CONTAINED -OUT LEVELS IN ATTACHMENT 1 TO THE NORTH CAROLINA CONTAINED -IN POLICYTHE SOIL MAY NOT BE RE -USED ON SITE AND MUST BE DISPOSED OF IN ACCORDANCE WITH DEQ HAZARDOUS WASTE SECTION RULES AND REGULATIONS. 9 EMP Version 2, January 2021 c) Does the soil contain a CHARACTERISTIC WASTE? .................................... ❑ Yes ® No ❑ If yes, mark reason(s) why below (and include pertinent analytical results). ❑ Ignitability Click or tap here to enter text. ❑ Corrosivity Click or tap here to enter text. ❑ Reactivity Click or tap here to enter text. ❑ Toxicity ck or tap here to enter text. ❑ TCLP results Click or tap here to enter text. ❑ Rule of 20 results (20 times total analytical results for an individual hazardous constituent on TCLP list cannot, by test method, exceed regulatory TCLP standard) irk or tap here to enter text. ® If no, explain rationale: Below 20x rule d) NOTE: IF SOIL MEETS THE DEFINITION OF A CHARACTERISTIC HAZARDOUS WASTE, THE SOIL MAYNOT BE RE -USED ON SITE AND MUST BE DISPOSED OF IN ACCORDANCE WITH DEQ HAZARDOUS WASTE SECTION RULES AND REGULATIONS. 2) Screening criteria by which soil disposition decisions will be made (e.g., left in place, capped in place with low permeability barrier, removed to onsite location and capped, removed offsite): ❑ Preliminary Health -Based Residential SRGs ® Preliminary Health -Based Industrial/Commercial SRGs ® Division of Waste Management Risk Calculator (For Brownfields Properties Only) ® Site -specific risk -based cleanup level. Please provide details of methods used for determination/explanation. Compare to background metals concentrations per BRS direction. Additional comments: Click or tap here to enter text. 3) If known impacted soil is proposed to be reused within the Brownfields Property Boundary, please check the measures that will be utilized to ensure safe placement and documentation of same. Please attach a proposed location diagram/site map. ❑ Provide documentation of analytical report(s) to Brownfields Project Manager ❑ Provide documentation of final location, thickness and depth of relocated soil on site map to Brownfields Project Manager once known ❑ Geotextile to mark depth of fill material. Provide description of material: 10 EMP Version 2, January 2021 Click or tap here to enter text. ❑ Manage soil under impervious cap ❑ or clean fill ❑ ❑ Describe cap or fill: Click or tap here to enter text. ❑ Confer with NC BF Project Manager if Brownfield Plat must be revised (or re -recorded if actions are Post -Recordation). ❑ GPS the location and provide site map with final location. ® Other. Please provide a description of the measure: Soil will be placed back in trenches/holes to the extent possible or spread immediately adjacent to excavation areas for footers/fence posts. For the building the excess soil will be placed back below the building. Excess soil will be stockpiled on paved area and may be placed in unpaved/vegetated areas to avoid surface water runoff impacts, which is separated from the paved area by a concrete wall. 4) Please describe the following action(s) to be taken during and following excavation and management of site soils: Management of fugitive dust from site ® Yes, describe the method will include: Management of fugitive dust is not anticipated to be needed; however, standard construction techniques for dust control such as wetting/water misting will be used if required based on conditions. ❑ No, explain rationale: Click or tap here to enter text. Field Screening of site soil ® Yes, describe the field screening method, frequency of field screening, person conducting field screening: Soil is not anticipated to be impacted beyond background metals. The contractors will be requested to look for stained soils and/or soils containing odors during excavation that may indicate impacted soils. If suspect soils are encountered, the contractor will stop work in the area and the environmental consultant will be contacted to evaluate the soil. If impacted soil is identified, it will be stockpiled in accordance with Figure 1 and sampled in accordance with this EMP. If impacted soil is identified, the DEQ Brownfields Project Manager will be contacted within 48 hours of discovery (e.g., stained soil with elevated field screening results or laboratory results). ❑ No, explain rationale: Click or tap here to enter text. Soil Sample Collection ❑ Yes, describe the sampling method (e.g., in -situ grab, composite, stockpile, etc.): 11 EMP Version 2, January 2021 Click or tap here to enter text. ® No, explain rationale: Samples are not proposed unless field evidence indicates the potential presence of soil impacts that are not consistent with previous assessment findings. Soil will either be 1) transported to a NCDEQ permitted facility for disposal; or 2) sampled and evaluated as potential on -site fill, beneficial fill at a non-Brownfields property or fill at another Brownfields property. Under these conditions, the soil may need to be sampled in -situ or segregated to allow for additional sample collection. Segregation methods utilized by the Contractor will include temporary stockpiling in general accordance with NCDEQ guidance. If soil samples are collected for analysis, please check the applicable chemical analytes: ® Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by EPA Method 8260 ® Semi -volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) by EPA Method 8270 ® Metals RCRA List (8) (arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium, mercury, lead, selenium and silver): Specify Analytical Method Number(s): 6010 or 6020 ❑ Pesticides: Specify Analytical Method Number(s): Click or tap here to enter text ❑ PCBs: Specify Analytical Method Number(s): (lirle nr tan kprP to AntAr tAv4 ❑ Other Constituents & Respective Analytical Method(s) (i.e. Hexavalent Chromium, Herbicides, etc.): Specify Analytical Method Number(s): Hexavalent chromium by 7199 ® Check to confirm that stockpiling of known or suspected impacted soils will be conducted in accordance with Figure 1 of this EMP. Stockpile methodology should provide erosion control, prohibiting contact between surface water/precipitation and contaminated soil, and preventing contaminated runoff. Explain any variances or provide additional details as needed: If stockpiling is needed, it will occur on paved surfaces in the northern portion of the Site and stockpiles will be covered with plastic and secured. ❑ Final grade sampling of exposed native soil (i.e., soil that will not be under buildings or permanent hardscape). Select chemical analyses for final grade samples with check boxes below (Check all thatapply): ❑ Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by EPA Method 8260 ❑ Semi -volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) by EPA Method 8270 ❑ Metals RCRA List (8) (arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium, mercury, lead, selenium and silver): Specify Analytical Method Number(s): 12 EMP Version 2, January 2021 Click or tap here to enter text. ❑ Pesticides: Specify Analytical Method Number(s): ❑ PCBs: Specify Analytical Method Number(s): Click or t=- h-r- to enter +pV' ❑ Other Constituents & Respective Analytical Method(s) (i.e. Hexavalent Chromium, Herbicides, etc.): Please provide a scope of work for final grade sampling, including a diagram of soil sampling locations, number of samples to be collected, and brief sampling methodology. Samples should be collected from 0-2 ft below ground surface, with the exception of VOCs which should be taken from 1-2 ft below ground surface. Alternatively, indicate if a work plan for final grade sampling may be submitted under separate cover. Click or tap here to enter text. ® If final grade sampling was NOT selected, please explain rationale: Final grade sampling is not planned as part of this EMP for the northern/western portion of the Site to be occupied as it is currently paved and no exposed areas are anticipated following the work included in this EMP. Part I.B. IMPORTED FILL SOIL NO SOIL MAY BE BROUGHT ONTO THE BROWNFIELDS PROPERTY WITHOUT PRIOR APPROVAL FROM THE BROWNFIELDS PROGRAM. According to the Brownfields IR 15, "Documenting imported soil (by sampling, analysis, and reporting in accordance with review and written approval in advance by the Brownfields Program), will safeguard the liability protections provided by the brownfields agreement and is in the best interest of the prospective developer/property owner." Requirements for importing fill: 1) Will fill soil be imported to the site? ................................................ ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown 2) If yes, what is the estimated volume of fill soil to be imported? Click or tap here to enter text. 3) If yes, what is the anticipated depth that fill soil will be placed at the property? (If a range of depths, please list the range.) ..IIL.R UI Ld P HtNC LU CIILCI LCXL 4) Provide the source of fill, including: location, site history, nearby environmental concerns, etc. Attach aerial photos, maps, historic Sanborn maps and a borrow source site history: 13 EMP Version 2, January 2021 No fill, stone, or gravel will be imported to the Site. Only virgin stone would be imported, if needed. 5) PRIOR TO ITS PLACEMENT AT THE BROWNFIELDS PROPERTY, provide a plan to analyze fill soil to demonstrate that it meets acceptable standards applicable to the site and can be approved for use atthe Brownfields property. Click or tap here to enter tex+ 6) Please check the applicable chemical analytes for fill soil samples. (Check all that apply): ❑ Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by EPA Method 8260 ❑ Semi -volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) by EPA Method 8270 ❑ Metals RCRA List (8) (arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium, mercury, lead, selenium and silver): Specify Analytical Method Number(s): Click or tali e to f-11«1 ❑ Pesticides: Specify Analytical Method Number(s): Click or tap here to enter text ❑ PCBs: Specify Analytical Method Number(s): Click or tap here to enter texl ❑ Other Constituents & Respective Analytical Method(s) (i.e. Hexavalent Chromium, Herbicides, etc.): ''';_'' - "--e to enter 7) The scope of work for import fill sampling may be provided below or in a Work Plan submitted separately for DEQ review and approval. Attach specific location maps for in -situ borrow sites. If using a quarry, provide information on the type of material to be brought onto the Brownfields Property. C HLK ur Lap here LU enLer LexL. Part I.C. EXPORTED SOIL NO SOIL MAY LEAVE THE BROWNFIELDS PROPERTY WITHOUT APPROVAL FROM THE BROWNFIELDS PROGRAM. FAILURE TO OBTAIN APPROVAL MAY VIOLATE A BROWNFIELDS AGREEMENT CAUSING A REOPENER OR JEOPARDIZING ELIGIBILITY IN THE PROGRAM, ENDANGERING LIABILITY PROTECTIONS AND MAKING SAID ACTION POSSIBLY SUBJECT TO ENFORCEMENT. JUSTIFICATIONS PROVIDED BELOW MUST BE APPROVED BY THE PROGRAM IN WRITING PRIOR TO COMPLETING TRANSPORT ACTIVITIES. Please refer to Brownfields IR 15 for additional details. 1) If export from a Brownfields Property is anticipated, please provide details regarding the proposed export actions. Volume of exported soil, depths, location from which soil will be excavated on site, related sampling results, etc. Provide a site map with locations of export and sampling results included. 14 EMP Version 2, January 2021 No export anticipated 2) To what type of facility will the export Brownfields soil be sent? ® Subtitle D/Municipal Solid Waste Landfill (analytical program to be determined by landfill) ® Permitted but Unlined Landfill (i.e. LCID, C&D, etc.) Analytical program to be determined by the accepting Landfill; ❑ Landfarm or other treatment facility ❑ Use as fill at another suitable Brownfields Property — determination that a site is suitable will require, at a minimum, that similar concentrations of the same or similar contaminants already exist at both sites, use of impacted soil will not increase the potential for risk to human health and the environment at the receiving Brownfields property, and that record of the acceptance of such soil from the property owner of the receiving site is provided to Brownfields. Please provide additional details below. ❑ Use as Beneficial Fill off -site at a non-Brownfields Property - Please provide documentation of approval from the property owner for receipt of fill material. This will also require approval by the DEQ Solid Waste Section. Additional information is provided in IR 15. Please provide additional details below. 3) Additional Details: (if transfer of soil to another property is requested above, please provide details related to the proposed plans). Part 1.D. MANAGEMENT OF UTILITY TRENCHES ❑ Install liner between native impacted soils and base of utility trench before filling with clean fill (Preferred) ® Last out, first in principle for impacted soils (if soil can safely be reused onsite and is nota hazardous waste), i.e., impacted soils are placed back at approximately the depths they were removed from such that impacted soil is not placed at a greater depth than the original depth from which it was excavated. ❑ Evaluate whether necessary to install barriers in conduits to prevent soil vapor transport, and/or degradation of conduit materials due to direct impact with contaminants? ❑ If yes, provide specifications on barrier materials or provide the results of this evaluation in the Vapor Mitigation Plan. Note that if vapor mitigation is planned for site buildings, utility corridors will need to be evaluated as part of mitigation designs: Click or tap here to enter text. ❑ If no, include rationale here: 15 EMP Version 2, January 2021 ❑ Unknown, details to be provided in the Vapor Mitigation Plan for site buildings Other comments regarding managing impacted soil in utility trenches: The contractor and workers will observe soil for potential impacts during utility installation activities. Should evidence of impacted (staining, strong odor, or materials of concern (i.e., chemicals, tanks, drums, etc.)), the contractor will contact the project environmental professional to observe the suspect condition. If the project environmental professional confirms that the material may be impacted, then the sampling procedures included in this EMP will be implemented In addition, the environmental professional will contact the DEQ Brownfields project manager within 48-hours to advise that person of the condition. Should the presence of impacted soil vapors be confirmed, work will be stopped in the area and the Brownfields Project Manager will be contacted to determine if further sampling, reporting, or mitigation is needed for said area. If required, mitigation measures will be approved by DEQ and installed prior to completing the construction activities. Safety screening activities will be implemented should impacted soil be discovered during utility trenching activities to include monitoring the worker breathing zone with a PID when in utility trenches. If screening indicates further action is warranted, the work zone will be evacuated until appropriate engineering controls (i.e., industrial fans, respirators) are implemented. PART 2. GROUNDWATER 1) What is the depth to groundwater at the Brownfields Property? Unknown but anticipated to be deeper than the proposed soil disturbance. 2) Is groundwater known to be contaminated by ❑onsite ❑offsite ❑both or ®unknown sources? Describe source(s): On -site groundwater not anticipated to be contaminated. If impacted, expected to be from adjacent parcel to the east (not upgradient) that housed the former mill operations 3) What is the direction of groundwater flow at the Brownfields Property? Unknown but expected to be to the north toward the creek. 4) Will groundwater likely be encountered during planned redevelopment activities? ❑Yes ®No If yes, describe these activities: Click or tap here to enter text. Regardless of the answer; in the event that contaminated groundwater is encountered during redevelopment activities (evenif no is checked above), list activities for contingent management of groundwater (e.g., dewateringof groundwater from excavations or foundations, containerizing, offsite disposal, discharge to sanitary sewer, NPDES permit, or sampling procedures). 16 EMP Version 2, January 2021 Work will stop to make plans to pump/containerize water for characterization purposes for off -site disposal or to obtain a permit for sanitary or stormwater discharge if dewatering is needed. Otherwise, holes/trenches will be backfilled. If contaminated groundwater is encountered NC Brownfields will be notified within 48hrs, and provided the lab results for review. The site contractor will contact an environmental professional to advise on next steps and to test and dispose of contaminated groundwater at an NC Brownfields approved off -site facility. 5) Are monitoring wells currently present on the Brownfields Property?.................❑Yes ®No If yes, are any monitoring wells routinely monitored through DEQ or other agencies?.................................................................................................................. ❑Yes ❑No 6) Please check methods to be utilized in the management of known and previously unidentified wells. ❑ Abandonment of site monitoring wells in accordance with all applicable regulations. It is the Brownfields Program's intent to allow proper abandonment of well(s) as specified in the Brownfields Agreement, except if required for active monitoring through another section of DEQ or the EPA. ❑ Location of existing monitoring wells marked ❑ Existing monitoring wells protected from disturbance ® Newly identified monitoring wells will be marked and protected from further disturbance until notification to DEQ Brownfields can be made and approval for abandonment is given. 7) Please provide additional details as needed: -Pr text. Please note, disturbance of existing site monitoring wells without approval by DEQ is not permissible. If monitoring wells are damaged and/or destroyed, DEQ may require that the PD be responsible for replacement of the well. PART 3. SURFACE WATER 1) Is surface water present at the property? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown 2) Attach a map showing the location of surface water at the Brownfields Property. 3) Is surface water at the property known to be contaminated? ❑ Yes ® No 4) Will workers or the public be in contact with surface water during planned redevelopment activities? ❑ Yes ® No 5) In the event that contaminated surface water is encountered during redevelopment activities, or clean surface water enters open excavations, list activities for management of such events (e.g. flooding, contaminated surface water run-off, stormwater impacts): 17 EMP Version 2, January 2021 If stormwater enters into open excavations, it will be allowed to percolate into the subsurface prior to continuing work and/or backfilling. Contaminated or suspected contaminated soil will be stockpiled, covered, and bermed as to not come in contact with stormwater. PART 4. SEDIMENT 1) Are sediment sources present on the property? ❑ Yes ® No 2) If yes, is sediment at the property known to be contaminated: ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown 3) Will workers or the public be in contact with sediment during planned redevelopment activities? ❑ Yes ® No 4) Attach a map showing location of known contaminated sediment at theproperty. 5) In the event that contaminated sediment is encountered during redevelopment activities, list activities for management of such events (stream bed disturbance): Click or tap here . enter text. PART 5. SOIL VAPOR 1) Do concentrations of volatile organic compounds at the Brownfields property exceed the following vapor intrusion screening levels (current version) in the following media: IHSB Residential Screening Levels: Soil Vapor: ........... ❑ Yes ❑ No ® Unknown Groundwater: ..... ❑ Yes ❑ No ® Unknown IHSB Industrial/Commercial Screening Levels: Soil Vapor: ........... ❑ Yes ❑ No ® Unknown Groundwater: ..... ❑ Yes ❑ No ® Unknown 2) Attach a map showing the locations of soil vapor contaminants that exceed site screening levels. 3) If applicable, at what depth(s) is soil vapor known to be contaminated? Click or tap here to enter text. 4) Will workers encounter contaminated soil vapor during planned redevelopment activities? ❑ Yes ❑ No 0 Unknown In the event that contaminated soil vapor is encountered during redevelopment activities (trenches, manways, basements or other subsurface work,) list activities for management of such contact: 18 EMP Version 2, January 2021 Impacted soil vapors are not anticipated. Adequate ventilation will be provided during trenching. If contaminated soil vapor is encountered based on odors, light headedness, etc., work in the area will cease and the area will be allowed to ventilate and/or appropriate engineering controls will be implemented prior to continuing work in the area. NCDEQ Brownfields will be notified within 48 hours if contaminated soil vapor is encountered. Brownfields will be contacted to determine if further sampling, reporting, and mitigation is needed if contaminated soil vapor is encountered. PART 6. SUB -SLAB SOIL VAPOR 1) Do concentrations of volatile organic compounds at the Brownfields property exceed the following vapor intrusion screening levels (current version) in sub -slab soil vapor: IHSB Residential Screening Levels: Soil Vapor: ........... ❑ Yes ❑ No ® Unknown Groundwater: ..... ❑ Yes ❑ No ® Unknown IHSB Industrial/Commercial Screening Levels: Soil Vapor: ........... ❑ Yes ❑ No ® Unknown 2) Groundwater:..... ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑x Unknown If data indicate that sub -slab soil vapor concentrations exceed screening levels, attach a map showing the location of these exceedances. 3) At what depth(s) is sub -slab soil vapor known to be contaminated? ❑0-6 inches ❑Other, please describe: Click or ar, „ lV enter te- 4) Will workers encounter contaminated sub -slab soil vapor during planned redevelopment activities? ❑ Yes ❑X No ❑ Unknown ® If no, include rationale here: No existing structures 5) In the event that contaminated soil vapor is encountered during redevelopment activities, list activities for management of such contact Click or tap here to enter tex-, PART 7. INDOOR AIR 1) Are indoor air data available for the Brownfields Property? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown 2) Attach a map showing the location(s) where indoor air contaminants exceed site screening levels. 3) If the structures where indoor air has been documented to exceed risk -based screening levels will 19 EMP Version 2, January 2021 not be demolished as part of redevelopment activities, will workers encounter contaminated indoor air during planned redevelopment activities? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown ® If no, include rationale here: No existing structures 4) In the event that contaminated indoor air is encountered during redevelopment activities, list activities for management of such contact: ..I IUK UI LdP I ICI C LU CI ILCI LC/.L VAPOR INTRUSION MITIGATION SYSTEM Is a vapor intrusion mitigation system (VIMS) proposed for this Brownfields Property? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown ® If no or unknown, include rationale here as well as plans for pre -occupancy sampling, as necessary: No existing or planned enclosed structures. If yes, ❑ VIMS Plan Attached or ❑ VIMS Plan to be submitted separately If submitted separately provide date: Click or tap here to enter tex- VIMS Plan shall be signed and sealed by a NC Professional Engineer If no, please provide a brief rationale as to why no vapor mitigation plan is warranted: If an enclosed structure is proposed, a VI evaluation will be completed to NCDEQs satisfaction prior to occupancy. Note that approval of this EMP does not imply approval with any vapor intrusion mitigation land use restrictions or requirements of the recorded or draft Brownfields Agreement and that separate approval of mitigation measures will be required. CONTINGENCY PLAN — encountering unknown tanks, drums, or other waste materials In this section please provide actions that will be taken to identify or manage unknown potential new sources of contamination. During redevelopment activities, it is not uncommon that unknown tanks, drums, fuel lines, landfills, orother waste materials are encountered. Notification to DEQ Brownfields Project Manager, UST Section, Fire Department, and/or other officials, as necessary and appropriate, is required when new potential source(s) of contamination are discovered. These Notification Requirements were outlined on Page 1 of this EMP. 20 EMP Version 2, January 2021 Should potentially impacted materials be identified that are inconsistent with known site impacts, the DEQ Brownfields Project Manager will be notified and a sampling plan will be prepared based on the EMP requirements and site -specific factors. Samples will generally be collected to document the location of the potential impacts. Check the following chemical analysis that are to be conducted on newly identified releases: ® Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by EPA Method 8260 ® Semi -volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) by EPA Method 8270 ® Metals RCRA List (8) (arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium, mercury, lead, selenium and silver) 6010 or 6020 ❑ Pesticides: Specify Analytical Method Number(s): ❑ PCBs: Specify Analytical Method Number(s): Click or tap here to enter text. ® Other Constituents & Analytical Method(s) (i.e. Hexavalent Chromium, Herbicides, etc.) Please note, if field observations indicate the need for additional analyses, they should be conducted, even if not listed here. Hexavalent chromium 7199 Please provide details on the proposed methods of managing the following commonly encountered issues during redevelopment of Brownfields Properties. USTs, sub -grade features, or buried waste are all unlikely and not expected. If any of below is encountered, work will stop and a plan will be developed to address the identified features. Underground Storage Tanks: Sub -Grade Feature/Pit: In the event a UST is encountered, sitework in this location will halt and the on -call environmental professional will be consulted to determine the appropriate course of action. In addition, the Brownfield Program Project Manager will be informed of the discovery and the UST will be handled through the Brownfields Program or the UST Section. Any residual fluids will be vacated from the UST and disposed at a permitted facility. The UST will be removed, transported offsite and disposed of at an appropriate/suitable facility. In the event it is not possible to remove the UST, environmental professional will gain NCBP approval to close the UST in place. The area in the vicinity of the UST will be assessed for evidence of a release. If assessment confirms a release from the UST system, impacted soils will be managed as summarized in Part 1.A and/or Part 1.0 of this EMP. Confirmation soil samples will be selected in accordance with NCDEQ UST Section Guidance: Guidelines for Site Checks, Tank Closure, and Initial Response and Abatement May 17, 2021 Version (UST Guidance) and submitted for the analytical suite selected above. 21 EMP Version 2, January 2021 Buried Waste Material — Note that if buried waste, non-native fill, or any obviously filled materials is encountered, the DEQ Brownfields Program must be notified to determine if investigation of landfill gases is required: If buried impacted material is identified during site development activities, excavation activities in the vicinity of the discovery will be put on hold and the environmental consultant will be contacted for evaluation and the discovery will be reported to DEQ within 48 hours. The material will be assessed by a qualified environmental scientist for visual or olfactory evidence of impacts and screened using a PID. If screening indicates impacts are present, samples will be analyzed as referenced above at the start of this section of the EMP, and additional analytes as determined upon inspection and review. Impacted soil will be handled onsite or disposed of at licensed offsite facilities in accordance with regulatory requirements and DEQ approval, as needed and confirmatory sampling and/or remedial activities will be conducted to the satisfaction of DEQ. Re -Use of Impacted Soils On -Site: Should impacted soils be re -used on -site, the Brownfields Project Manager will be notified within 48 hours and consulted as to potential further sampling, reporting, and mitigation. Soil will need to be tested in accordance with Part 1.A or through a work plan approved by the Brownfields Program prior to sampling. Brownfields approval must be obtained prior to re -use. If unknown, impacted soil is identified on -site, management on -site can be considered after the project team provides the necessary information, outlined in Part I.A. Item 11, for Brownfields Project Manager approval prior to final placement on -site. If other potential contingency plans are pertinent, please provide other details or scenarios as needed below: POST -REDEVELOPMENT REPORTING ® Check this box to acknowledge that a Redevelopment Summary Report will be required for the project. If the project duration is longer than one year, an annual update is required and will be due by January 31 of each year, or 30 days after each one-year anniversary of the effective date of this EMP (as agreed upon with the Project Manager). These reports will be required for as long as physical redevelopment of the Brownfields Property continues, except that the final Redevelopment Summary Report will be submitted within 90 days after completion of redevelopment. Based on the estimated construction schedule, the first Redevelopment Summary Report is anticipated to be submitted on 1/31/2024 The Redevelopment Summary Report shall include environment -related activities since the last report, with a summary and drawings, that describes: 22 EMP Version 2, January 2021 1. actions taken on the Brownfields Property; 2. soil grading and cut and fill actions; 3. methodology(ies) employed for field screening, sampling and laboratory analysis of environmental media; 4. stockpiling, containerizing, decontaminating, treating, handling, laboratory analysis and ultimate disposition of any soil, groundwater or other materials suspected or confirmed to be contaminated with regulated substances; and 5. removal of any contaminated soil, water or other contaminated materials (for example, concrete, demolition debris) from the Brownfields Property (copies of all legally required manifests shall be included). ❑X Check box to acknowledge consent to provide a NC licensed P.G. or P.E. sealed, Redevelopment Summary Report in compliance with the site's Brownfields Agreement. 23 EMP Version 2, January 2021 APPROVAL SIGNATURES Brownfields ProiegVNumber: 22019-18-041 nfields.jProhtt Nauffe: Cone Mills - Greensboro :)spective Developer: Pruning Perfection Landscaping, LLC nted Name/Title/Company: Jon Hein/Owner/Pruning rfection Consultant: Geosyntec Consultants of NC, P.C. Printed Name/Title/Company: Kaitlyn Rhonehouse/Senior Principal/Geosyntec IF. looa-4�91 Brownfields Project Manager: Tyler B. Pearson 24 EMP Version 2, January 2021 04/18/2022 Date Click or tap to enter a date. Date 4/10/2023 04/19/2022 Date Click or tap to enter a date. 25 EMP Version 2, January 2021 Figure 1 NCBP Diagram for Temporary Containment of Impacted or Potentially Impacted Soil Cross -Section View Top Plastic Cover Sheeting: Underliner: 1 layer, minimum of 10 (1 Layer, minimum: 10 mil thick) mil thick plastic Berm (Straw bales, composted earth, etc.) Land Surface \ x Straw Bale Berm Contaminated Soils Map View Uo o0*1- - -37 �L.. ""' Contaminated Soils Weight (If plastic cover used) I� Weight ....................................................... aO Plastic Sheeting Note: Adapted from NC DEQ UST Section "Guidelines for Ex Situ Petroleum Contaminated Soil Remediation" dated December, 1, 2013 26 EMP Version 2, January 2021 \ --\ NGEYV1U,E 57 T `� 798H.IG(rM \81�DR3wM161 � '.. , R•a6'Bt.•xn47 \ m.r � I� \ II ImVaeawr834wg _ \ \ \\ \ ) rn a6tRWt \ \ 4A\ \ II I AIM R,5 S IIN09' \`\ � \``\WM \ -- - r -- ` OINTOFC(QH -- -r- - - �-- \ \ \ �• i \pis »act el wu mn I I I \ \\ ♦ �\s!o °°n wr-no ^Men noI1nO1FAIRMOUTAMA . I j I 1 r DISTI'lla ROPOMI1L 58-7 MWOM L'at3a N ot/ I I I z ■.R« COMM Mf W. Ai now `•y, \ '\,.\ SEAL I Po.O 6NNPL nVRi �L-3731 -�fjVIEW ST ET WR5 P34> 1Z suN'�.-•-4, r /`d' rMW WA-KMM IAMMR°#nn l•]OlN ` kalfsiat51fF7J \\ /re 414�..•' - .efP s3�' FB MP. at , B ��4]_ Figure 2: Site Portion of the Brownfields Property and Historical Sampling Locatoins (source: 2019 Brownfields Agreement) Porlluorooc7ode MW-fi lu511ote 0.002o Acid M%if ll1512018 0.0010 MW-8 1115,7018 0.0068 NE-M estebluhW - 'drrg level 3- Estimated Ceneentn6dn SAIL Sol c ..emirmnls in milligrams per kiloVr m (the equivalent of puts pW million). OK arc -I.& levels f« Which are derived from live Rcid,,AW Preliminary Indsauisl Health. Bored Soil Remedlstion Godis of the Innctive Hazardous Sites Branch of DEQ's SuperfoW Section (Febmary 2019 vusion): Soil Contsminont Sao do Depth (0) Date of Suepl(ng Catttnln0on E asdin8 Sweenia8 Level Raidedhl Screening Level. m Arsenio TP-1 3.4 10292018 3.OJ 068 TP-2 2.5.3.5 1OW2018 429 7P-3 34 10292018 231 TP4 4.6 1029/2018 14.2 S13-1 3.4 10292018 0.7U S&2 34 10292018 0.681 9&3 1 to/2912018 1.5 Me 24 10292018 1.8 S&6 34 UlIn01S 1.9 S&7 9.1 II1120I/ 21 8&8 1}!s Illinois OL771 HSII.9 24 92807016 9.B4 iicnee(garfhracae HS&3 34 927/16 3.6 1.1 HS&9 24 928/16 1 1.76 HS IO 34 PaVL6 113 Benco(b)fhtomtWcne HS13-2 23-3.5 927/16 1.21 1.1 HSB-3 HS&9 34 2.4 9127,116 9nNt6 399 2.21 HSB-10 34 928,16 1.8 Buuo(W"i)P.Ylew HSB-2 23.3.5 927/16 0.368 NE HSB-3 3-4 9127/16 0" HS17 }{ 9MV16 0388 I HS&9 24 928/16 D.412 HSB-10 3-492N16 - 0.331 I rnnzappyrvw 1 t t. e l t v.,, 'Cerccraagorn besned torepaensnalua0yowerhpbBP�lnehdatrak hm8(ertl,0ine d&9). ]]D I F I e a hCerr 66140r<w6ao 2 DrnO roofs.a.� 27 EMP Version 2, January 2021 Sall Sancta Locatio Depth (8) Dote or Sampling ConrsrNetin. Exceeding Screening L-I RnidentiA SQecd(ng Level HS&2 2.5.35 9/27/16 0.918 HSB-3 34 9MM 3.07 RSE-1 34 9/=16 0.635 HSB-9 24 Mill L41 HS&10 34 9118/l6 1.22 Cadmium HS&9 24 9g812016 19.2 1/ Dibeoe oA then- SBA 1 24 1On92o18 0.1821 0.11 Hexavalent CT-i- TP•1 34 101292o18 e63 031 77-2 2S-3.3 IG79/2018 eY 4 TP•3 34 1d29/201s <s.5 iP4 4.6 HY292018 43.4 TP-5 13.15 1011"Wi8 43.3 SB4 34 100292018 451 S&2 34 I0129/2018 G5.8 S&3 24 10/29/3019 6.9 SB4 24 10d29/1018 <6.0 S&5 34 10r292012 -4.9 S134 34 11/12018 -6.3 S&7 9•11 111102018 GS.5 SB-E 1 13.13 111112018 a63 Inden 13.3•M - HS&1 1 34 927116 1.14 1.1 PI-0-HS51 IIS&2 2.5.3.5 927116 1.37 NE IISB-3 3.4 927/16 5.20 3.4 WWII$ L49 HS&9 1 F. 9=6 2.65 HSB-10 34I 92B/16 1.94 aTlayedofer�<e"-eine8�are ror. l.OF•6lifetimo lnertmenui mnea rifle -'------'-• I-&tinxed Canmao-,tien Sl AT3 V Soil gu contominsnts in micrograms per ntbie meter - the screening levd-, for Hitich we derived from Residentlnl Vnpor intrusion Seseenine Levels of the Division OMMIe Almegrment (Fe-y 20)8 vrrsidny 2x319-1 &lM1C'ma Afdl-0raenbam 3 D➢Aar 005.0 off _ •i� f� /�ij/ .b � I I / I ONMINES MEN -_ _- I z:E 1 if Of NO y 1 1 � _ 415ff llllNE flut FfIIf S. ��.F-eN=INFORMATION / / O ••tl.a.•l..f 1 slrf INf Of N�l1pN TOTMAfUO1TMCT: 2.96 ACRB Figure 3: Plat Survey showing areas of potential soil disturbance 28 EMP Version 2, January 2021 WETLAND NOTf V�„wl ll sl- N 01�-5' .w N GA"HIC VC f Vega Metal Structures 0 4047 US HWY 311, RANDLEMAN VI�15 13 Veg a m eta I stru ctu res @ g m a i 1. co n Q (336)799-4416 CUSTOMER DETAILS Sales: Lesly Pacheco 134047 US HWY 311, RANDLEMAN vmstructures6l@gmail.com Building Quote QTE-005827 Date 09/23/2022 Tota I $35,351.10 Lisa Regino Triple Wide Garages - 30 x 40 x 14 Billing Address Roof Color: Black 0 594 Blythewood Court,NC,27455 Trim Color: Black Shipping Address — 0 594 Blythewood Court,NC,27455 Sides/Ends Color: Gray 13pruningperfection@gmail.com ❑ Wainscot Color: NA O (336) 337-8503 Ready for Installation? — Jobsite Level? — Permit Required? _ Inside City Limit? — Electricity Available? — Installation Surface? Concrete Building Dimension Roof Style Gauge Wind/Snow Rating Distance on Center 30'W x40'L x14'1H Vertical 14 Gauge Built To Local Code 5 Feet 30X40' (Roof 41') Vertical Roof 1 $7,000.00 14' Height 1 $3,600.00 Built To Local Code 1 $0.00 4/12' Roof Pitch 1 $0.00 Front Wall Closed Horizontal 1 $3,300.00 Back Wall Closed Horizontal 1 $3,300.00 Left Closed Horizontal 1 $1,700.00 Right Closed Horizontal 1 $1,700.00 36x80in Walk-in Door on Left Wall 1 $300.00 12xl2ft Garage Door on Back Wall (Chain Hoist) 1 $1,450.00 12x12ft Garage Door on Front Wall (Chain Hoist) 1 $1,450.00 12x12ft Garage Door on Front Wall (Chain Hoist) 1 $1,450.00 COLOR SCREWS 1 $0.00 5 FT CENTERS 1 $0.00 GABLE TRUSS 1 $0.00 GRADING UP TO 3 HRS 1 $600.00 FOOTERS 1 $4,060.00 30X4OX4 INCH SLAB 4000 PSI 1 $5,625.00 LIFT FEE 1 $2,400.00 Roof Only Insulation Type Single Bubble 1 $1,344.00 Manufacturer Discount 1 $3,927.90 NOTES Sub Total: $35,351.10 Additional Charges $0.00 Grand Total $35,351.10 Pay Now Balance Due BUILDING VIEW FRONT BUILDING VIEW LEFT BUILDING VIEW BACK BUILDING VIEW RIGHT 2D DRAWING-1 Width 27 -Back 3 r ?° 30' Wide * 40' Long *14' Tall s A A c Front I2'*IZ' I2'*I2' Z' 1" 1' 11 Full Width 30' LEGENDS Garage Door @ Garage Door Frameout @ Walk in Door a Walk in Door Frameout M Windows 8 Windows Frameout S Open Wall Close Wall a Distance M storage Length (Utility)