22016 Quality Products 1513 VIMS Install Report 20230327

VIMS Installation Completion Report

Quality Products Company
1513 S. Mint Street
Brownfields Project ID No. 22016-18-060

H&H Job No. LEH-004
March 27, 2023

#C-1269 Engineering #C-245 Geology
i
S:\AAA-Master Projects\Lischerong Enterprises and Holdings (LEH)\S. Mint St\1513-1521 Assessments\VIMS Install Report\Report
VIMS Installation Completion Report Quality Products Company 1513 S. Mint Street Charlotte, North Carolina Brownfields Project No. 22016-18-060 H&H Job No. LEH-004 Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction ..............................................................................................................................1
2.0 VIMS Installation and Influence Testing ..............................................................................4
2.1 VIMS Installation ...................................................................................................................4
2.2 VIMS Influence Testing .........................................................................................................5
3.0 Sub-Slab Soil Gas Assessment Activities ...............................................................................6
3.1 Sub-Slab Soil Gas Sampling ..................................................................................................6
3.2 Sub-Slab Soil Gas Sampling Results ......................................................................................8
4.0 Summary and Conclusions ...................................................................................................10

List of Tables

Table 1 Summary of Sub-Slab Soil Gas Analytical Data
List of Figures

Figure 1 Redevelopment Site Plan

ii
S:\AAA-Master Projects\Lischerong Enterprises and Holdings (LEH)\S. Mint St\1513-1521 Assessments\VIMS Install Report\Report
List of Appendices

Appendix A Historical Data Summary Tables and Sample Location Maps
Appendix B VIMS Product Specification Sheets
Appendix C VIMS As-Built Drawings
Appendix D VIMS Installation Photographs
Appendix E Field Forms and Field Data
Appendix F Laboratory Analytical Report
Appendix G DEQ Risk Calculator Summary Pages

1
S:\AAA-Master Projects\Lischerong Enterprises and Holdings (LEH)\S. Mint St\1513-1521 Assessments\VIMS Install Report\Report
VIMS Installation Completion Report Quality Products Company 1513 S. Mint Street Charlotte, North Carolina Brownfields Project No. 22016-18-060 H&H Job No. LEH-004 1.0 Introduction

On behalf of LEH NC Mint, LLC (the Prospective Developer or PD), Hart & Hickman, PC (H&H)
has prepared this report to document vapor intrusion mitigation system (VIMS) installation,
influence testing, and post-construction sub-slab soil gas assessment activities completed at a
portion of the Quality Products Company Brownfields property (Brownfields Project No. 22016-
18-060) located at 1513 S. Mint Street and 1515 S. Mint Street in Charlotte, Mecklenburg County,
North Carolina (Site or subject Site). The Site is comprised of three tax parcels (Mecklenburg
County Parcel ID Nos. 11908315, 11908316, and 11908317) totaling approximately 0.53-acres
and is currently developed with a single-story multi-tenant commercial building with an associated
gravel-covered parking area.

Proposed redevelopment plans for the Site include upfit and renovations for adaptive re-use of the
existing building including spaces for a restaurant, a dentist office, and concert hall. The
remainder of the Site will generally be covered with impervious surfaces including parking areas,
sidewalks and exterior patios. Renovation of the 1515 S. Mint Street tenant space was completed
and documented in the VIMS Installation Completion Report dated July 29, 2022, which was
submitted to and reviewed by DEQ. The VIMS Installation Completion Report was approved by
DEQ in a Vapor Mitigation Compliance Review letter dated August 10, 2022. The 1513 S. Mint
Street tenant space upfit is currently in progress and occupancy for the space is anticipated in early-
April with the business set to open in mid-April. A redevelopment Site plan is included in Figure
1.

H&H previously completed vapor intrusion assessment activities at the Site to evaluate the
potential for vapor intrusion prior to redevelopment. Results of previous vapor intrusion
assessment activities are documented in the Limited Phase II Environmental Site Assessment (ESA)
2
S:\AAA-Master Projects\Lischerong Enterprises and Holdings (LEH)\S. Mint St\1513-1521 Assessments\VIMS Install Report\Report
Report (dated March 2, 2018), and the Brownfields Assessment Report (dated October 22, 2019).
Tabular summary of the vapor intrusion assessment sample results and sample location maps are
provided in Appendix A for ease of reference.

In addition, H&H conducted a baseline mercury sub-slab soil gas assessment at the site to establish
pre-mitigation baseline mercury vapor concentrations. Results of the mercury vapor assessment
are documented in H&H’s Mercury Vapor Assessment Report (dated October 27, 2020). During
the assessment, four sub-slab samples were collected. Mercury was not detected in three of the
samples, and was detected at an estimated concentration at one location (SSV-3, 0.52 µg/m3) well
below the DEQ DWM Non-Residential Vapor Intrusion Soil Gas Screening Level of 26 µg/m3.
Based on these concentrations, H&H recommended no further assessment of mercury vapor on
the site. DEQ found the findings in the above report to be in compliance with the Vapor Intrusion
Mitigation Plan for the property in a Mercury Assessment Report Compliance Review dated
December 3, 2020.

The draft Brownfields Agreement for the Site includes the following land use restriction (LUR)
No. 15.g.:

No enclosed building may be constructed on the Brownfields Property and no existing building,
defined as those depicted on the plat component of the Notice of Brownfields Property, may be
occupied until DEQ determines in writing that:
i. the building is or would be protection of the building’s users, public health and the
environment from risk of vapor intrusion based on site assessment data or a site-specific
risk assessment approved in writing by DEQ; or
ii. the building is or would be sufficiently distant from the Brownfields Property’s
groundwater and/or soil contamination based on assessment data approved in writing by
DEQ that the building’s users, public health and the environment will be protected from
risk from vapor intrusion related to said contamination; or
iii. vapor mitigation measures are installed or implemented to the satisfaction of a
professional engineer licensed in North Carolina, as evidenced by said engineer’s
profession seal on a report that includes photographs and a description of installation and
3
S:\AAA-Master Projects\Lischerong Enterprises and Holdings (LEH)\S. Mint St\1513-1521 Assessments\VIMS Install Report\Report
performance of said measures. Any design specification for vapor intrusion mitigation
measured shall be approved in writing by DEQ in advance of installation and/or
implementation of said measures. The design specifications shall include
methodology(ies) for demonstrating performance of said measures.

In accordance with the LUR No. 15.g., the DEQ Brownfields Program approved Environmental
Management Plan (EMP) dated October 29, 2019, and conversations with DEQ Brownfields
personnel in a meeting held on October 7, 2019, the PD has elected to install a vapor intrusion
mitigation system (VIMS) in the Site building.

The DEQ-approved Vapor Intrusion Mitigation Plan (VIMP), dated August 3, 2020 includes
installation of a passive sub-slab depressurization system in the 1513 and 1515 S. Mint Street
building and post-installation sub-slab soil gas sampling. Updated VIMS drawings were submitted
to DEQ to account for an addition to the 1513 S. Mint Street space and the updated VIMS drawings
were approved by DEQ via email on June 6, 2022. This report documents installation of the VIMS
and post-construction sub-slab soil gas assessment for the 1513 S. Mint Street tenant space.

A discussion of VIMS installation activities is provided in Section 2.0, a summary of sub-slab soil
gas assessment activities is provided in Section 3.0, and summary and conclusions based on the
results of the VIMS installation and soil gas assessment activities are provided in Section 4.0.

4
S:\AAA-Master Projects\Lischerong Enterprises and Holdings (LEH)\S. Mint St\1513-1521 Assessments\VIMS Install Report\Report
2.0 VIMS Installation and Influence Testing

2.1 VIMS Installation

The DEQ-approved VIMP includes installation of VaporBlock® Plus 20 (VBP20) vapor barrier
manufactured by Raven Industries (Raven). The vapor barrier was installed above the base course
layer and beneath the concrete. VBP20 is an ASTM-certified 20-mil, multilayer, chemically
resistant vapor barrier, designed to minimize the migration of volatile organic compounds (VOCs).
The vapor barrier was installed per manufacturer installation instructions by the contractor.
Technical specifications and installation instructions obtained from Raven for the VBP20 vapor
barrier and associated accessories are provided in Appendix B.

VBP20 was installed to cover the base course layer below the slab area of the proposed ground
floor slab. The vapor barrier was attached/sealed to concrete and masonry surfaces of footings
and existing walls (see Sheet VM-2). Two-sided butyl seal tape was used to attach/seal the vapor
barrier to concrete or masonry surfaces. Seams within the building footprint have a minimum 12-
inch overlap and were sealed with VaporSeal™ tape. Small puncture holes were sealed with
VaporSeal™ tape. Larger holes, tears, or other damage were repaired using a patch of vapor barrier
that overlaps the damaged area and then taped along the seams. In areas where utility penetrations
(i.e., piping, columns, ducts, etc.) are present and the use of taping was not practical or was deemed
“ineffective” by the design engineer, Pour-N-Seal ™ was poured into a form to patch the
penetration with a vapor tight seal.

The VIMP also includes installation of a passive mitigation system beneath the slab of the 1513 S.
Mint Street building to reduce the potential for structural vapor intrusion into the non-residential
space. The passive system includes a polyvinyl chloride (PVC) piping network below the slab of
the building. Three vertical exhaust risers that extend to the roof of the building were connected
to the sub-slab piping network. Empire Model TV04SS (stainless steel) wind-driven turbine fans
were installed in-line with the risers on the roof of the building to enhance passive vapor mitigation
and discharge sub-slab vapors to the atmosphere above the roof of the building. The VIMS layout
5
S:\AAA-Master Projects\Lischerong Enterprises and Holdings (LEH)\S. Mint St\1513-1521 Assessments\VIMS Install Report\Report
is shown in the as-built drawings (Sheets VM-1 and VM-2) included as Appendix C. Product
specification sheets for the turbine fans and sub-slab piping are included in Appendix B.

To enhance sub-slab vapor transmission and collection effectiveness, a uniform layer of high
permeability stone (#57 stone) was installed directly below the concrete slab to allow for air
movement beneath the entirety of the slab. Sub-slab vapor collection piping (4-inch diameter) was
installed completely within the high permeability stone layer.

The VIMP also includes three vacuum monitoring points (depicted on the as-built sheets in
Appendix C). The vacuum monitoring points were used to measure the pressure differential
between ambient air and the sub-slab during influence testing activities described below, and for
collection of sub-slab soil gas samples.

During installation of the VIMS in the 1513 S. Mint Street tenant space, H&H conducted
inspections during various phases of construction to confirm the VIMS was installed in accordance
with the DEQ-approved VIMP. Inspections were completed during the following phases of
installation:
• after installation of sub-slab horizontal collection piping system within the gravel base;
• following placement and sealing of the vapor barrier, prior to pouring the concrete building
slab; and
• after installation of vertical exhaust riser pipe and turbine fan installations

Based upon periodic inspections completed during VIMS installation activities, the VIMS was
installed in accordance with the DEQ-approved VIMP. VIMS details and specifications, and a
VIMS as-built drawing which depicts the VIMS layout are included in Appendix C. A
photographic log of installed VIMS components is provided in Appendix D.

2.2 VIMS Influence Testing

On May 2, 2022, H&H completed influence testing for the system to evaluate sub-slab vacuum
communication and to document sufficient depressurization can be obtained below the slab should
6
S:\AAA-Master Projects\Lischerong Enterprises and Holdings (LEH)\S. Mint St\1513-1521 Assessments\VIMS Install Report\Report
the system be activated with electric fans in the future (if warranted). DEQ considers 4 Pascals
(Pa), or 0.016 inches of water column (in-WC) differential pressure the minimum vacuum needed
for an active depressurization system to effectively treat potential structural vapor intrusion.

VIMS vacuum influence pilot testing included use of AMG Eagle Extreme electric fans to model
an active depressurization system. Differential pressure measurements were collected at each
vacuum monitoring point using a Dwyer series 475 Mark III Digital manometer (capable of
measuring 0.001 in-WC or 0.25 Pa) to establish baseline conditions prior to operation of the AMG
Eagle Extreme electric fans. Following collection of baseline differential pressure measurements,
the electric fans were turned on and differential pressure measurements were collected at each
monitoring point. Results of the influence tests indicated sub-slab vacuum measured at the
monitoring points ranged from 0.893 in-WC to 1.070 in-WC in the tenant space, which
demonstrates sufficient vacuum can be achieved below the slab of each of this portion of the
building. The locations of the permanent monitoring points (denoted by MP nomenclature) are
shown in VM-1 (Appendix C). The pilot test field data is included in Appendix E.
3.0 Sub-Slab Soil Gas Assessment Activities

Following successful installation of the VIMS, H&H collected two sub-slab soil gas samples for
laboratory analysis from the 1513 S. Mint Street tenant space. The sub-slab assessment activities
were conducted in accordance with the DEQ-approved VIMP and the DEQ DWM Vapor Intrusion
Guidance (Guidance) dated March 2018.

3.1 Sub-Slab Soil Gas Sampling
On March 17, 2023, H&H collected two sub-slab soil gas samples from permanent monitoring
points in the 1513 S. Mint Street tenant space. The sampling was performed following VIMS
installation activities and over two weeks after completion of the riser piping and installation of
the wind-driven turbine fans. The sub-slab soil gas samples were collected from permanent
monitoring point locations MP-4 and MP-6, as shown on VM-1 in Appendix C. One duplicate
sub-slab soil gas sample (MP-DUP) was collected for quality assurance/quality control (QA/QC)
purposes from the MP-4 parent location during the sampling event. The duplicate sample was
7
S:\AAA-Master Projects\Lischerong Enterprises and Holdings (LEH)\S. Mint St\1513-1521 Assessments\VIMS Install Report\Report
collected utilizing a laboratory supplied stainless-steel sampling “T” which allows for the
simultaneous collection of two sub-slab soil gas samples from a single location.

To collect the sub-slab soil gas samples, Teflon sample tubing was secured to a 2-inch expandable
well cap with a sampling port that was secured onto the PVC monitoring point. The tubing was
connected to an airflow regulator and laboratory-supplied batch-certified 1.4-liter stainless steel
Summa canister. The air flow regulator was preset by the laboratory to collect a soil gas sample
over a period of 10 minutes.

Prior to sample collection, H&H conducted a leak test at each monitoring point by placing a shroud
around the monitoring point, expandable well cap, and sampling train including the Summa
canister. The air within the shroud was flooded with helium gas and concentrations were measured
with a calibrated helium detector. Helium concentrations within the shroud were maintained
between approximately 15.8% and 16.1%. A GilAir vacuum pump was connected to the sample
tubing outside of the shroud and used to purge a minimum of three volumes (monitoring point and
sample train) of soil gas into a Tedlar® bag at each sampling point. The helium gas detector was
used to measure helium concentrations within the Tedlar bag sample to confirm helium
concentrations in the sample were less than 10% of that measured within the shroud. Results of
the helium leak checks indicate that short-circuiting at the monitoring points or within the sampling
train were not present. Soil gas sampling field forms completed by sampling personnel are
included in Appendix E.

Following successful leak checks, the air flow regulators were opened to allow collection of the
sub-slab soil gas samples. Vacuum in the Summa canisters was monitored during the sampling
event to confirm adequate sample volume was collected at each monitoring point location. Upon
completion of sample collection, the air flow regulator was closed to the Summa canister. The
canisters were labeled with the sample identification, beginning and ending times, pressure
measurements, and the requested analysis. The canisters were then placed in laboratory supplied
shipping containers and delivered to Waypoint Analytical Laboratories (Waypoint) under standard
chain of custody protocols for analysis of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by EPA Method
TO-15.
8
S:\AAA-Master Projects\Lischerong Enterprises and Holdings (LEH)\S. Mint St\1513-1521 Assessments\VIMS Install Report\Report
3.2 Sub-Slab Soil Gas Sampling Results

The sub-slab soil gas sample analytical results are summarized in Table 1. The results were
compared to the DEQ DWM Non-Residential Vapor Intrusion Sub-Slab and Exterior Soil Gas
Screening Levels (SGSLs) dated January 2023. The laboratory analytical report with chain of
custody record is provided as Appendix F.

The monitoring point soil gas sample analytical results indicate that several compounds were
detected at concentrations above laboratory method detection limits (MDLs) in each sample, but
below the DEQ DWM Residential and Non-Residential Vapor Intrusion SGSLs. Naphthalene was
detected at concentrations above DEQ DWM Residential Vapor Intrusion SGSLs but below Non-
Residential Vapor Intrusion SGSLs in samples collected from both monitoring points.
Trichloroethene (TCE) was detected at concentrations below both the DEQ DWM Residential and
Non-Residential SGSLs in samples MP-4 and MP-DUP. TCE was also detected at concentrations
above DEQ DWM Non-Residential Vapor Intrusion SGSLs in sample MP-6. No other compounds
were detected above DEQ DWM Residential or Non-Residential Vapor Intrusion SGSLs.

The DEQ DWM Vapor Intrusion SGSLs are very conservative and based on a target carcinogenic
risk (TCR) for potential carcinogenic risks of 1 x 10-6 and a hazard quotient (HQ) of 0.2 for
potential non-carcinogenic risks. The DEQ and EPA acceptable risk level for potential
carcinogenic risks is a cumulative lifetime incremental cancer risk (LICR) of 1 x 10-4 or less and
the acceptable level for non-carcinogenic risks is a cumulative hazard index (HI) of 1 or less. The
HI is the sum of HQs for each target analyte.

H&H utilized the DEQ Risk Calculator (January 2023) to confirm that there are no potential vapor
intrusion risks at unacceptable levels. H&H modeled a worst-case scenario by using the highest
concentrations of any compound detected below the slab in the 1513 S. Mint Street tenant space
based on a non-residential use scenario to conservatively evaluate potential vapor intrusion risks.
The calculated cumulative LICR and HI values are provided in Table 1, and a copy of the
completed DEQ Risk Calculator is provided in Appendix G.

9
S:\AAA-Master Projects\Lischerong Enterprises and Holdings (LEH)\S. Mint St\1513-1521 Assessments\VIMS Install Report\Report
As shown in Table 1, results of the worst-case risk calculations indicate a calculated cumulative
LICR of 1.0 x 10-6 and a HI value of 0.26. The calculated cumulative residential use LICR and
HI values are within the DEQ and EPA acceptable levels. These risk calculator results confirm
that compound concentrations detected below the slab do not pose vapor intrusion risks at
unacceptable levels within the 1513 S. Mint Street tenant space with a passive VIMS.

10
S:\AAA-Master Projects\Lischerong Enterprises and Holdings (LEH)\S. Mint St\1513-1521 Assessments\VIMS Install Report\Report
4.0 Summary and Conclusions

Upfit of the 1513 S. Mint Street tenant space has been completed at the Quality Products Company
Brownfields property (Brownfields Project No. 22016-18-060) located in Charlotte, Mecklenburg
County. The 1515 S. Mint Street tenant space was redeveloped in 2022. A separate report was
submitted to document installation of the VIMS in this space on July 29, 2022 and was approved
by DEQ in a letter dated August 10, 2022.

During redevelopment of the 1513 S. Mint Street space, H&H conducted VIMS installation
inspections to confirm the system was installed as designed and completed post-installation sub-
slab soil gas sampling activities to evaluate efficacy of the system. The VIMS installation
inspections and post-installation sampling activities were completed in general accordance with
the DEQ-approved VIMP. A brief summary of the VIMS installation and post-installation soil
gas assessment activities is provided below.

VIMS Installation
VIMS installation has been completed for 1513 S. Mint Street tenant space and consists of a
passive sub-slab depressurization system with vertical extraction piping to the roof connected to
wind-driven turbine fans. During installation of the VIMS, H&H personnel, under direction of a
North Carolina licensed Professional Engineer, conducted inspections during each stage of
installation. Results of the installation inspections indicate that the VIMS was successfully
installed in general accordance with the DEQ-approved VIMP. Influence testing for the space
confirmed that adequate vacuum is obtainable for the purpose of active vapor mitigation (if
warranted in the future).

Sub-Slab Vacuum
H&H completed vacuum influence pilot testing in March 2023 following installation of the VIMS
piping network, but prior to the complete installation of the vertical riser piping and wind-driven
turbines. Vacuum measurements collected during the pilot testing activities (range from 0.895 in-
WC to 1.070 in-WC) indicated that vacuum communication beneath the slab was achieved with
adequate differential pressure levels.
11
S:\AAA-Master Projects\Lischerong Enterprises and Holdings (LEH)\S. Mint St\1513-1521 Assessments\VIMS Install Report\Report
Sub-Slab Soil Gas Assessment
Following installation of the VIMS and completion of interior construction activities, H&H
collected three sub-slab soil gas samples (MP-DUP, MP-4, and MP-6) from the 1513 S. Mint
Street tenant space to evaluate potential vapor intrusion risks. Laboratory analytical results of the
sub-slab soil gas samples indicate that naphthalene was detected at concentrations above the DEQ
DWM Residential Vapor Intrusion SGSLs in samples MP-4/MP-DUP and MP-6. TCE was also
detected above DEQ DWM Residential and Non-Residential Vapor Intrusion SGSLs in sample
MP-6. H&H utilized the DEQ Risk Calculator (January 2023) to calculate the cumulative
carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic risks under a hypothetical worst-case residential-use scenario
by utilizing the highest concentration of each compound detected in the tenant space sub-slab soil
gas samples. Although TCE was detected above DEQ DWM Non-Residential Vapor Intrusion
SGSLs in sample MP-6, hypothetical worst-case non-residential use risk calculator results indicate
a calculated cumulative LICR of 1.0 x 10-6 and a calculated cumulative HI of 0.26. The calculated
cumulative non-residential use LICR and HI values are within the DEQ and EPA acceptable levels.

Based on the VIMS installation inspections, influence testing, and post-installation sub-slab soil
gas sampling results, the VIMS is effectively mitigating potential vapor intrusion risks at the Site.
The sub-slab soil gas to indoor air risk calculator results confirm that risks are below acceptable
levels.

Table 1
Summary of Sub-Slab Soil Gas Analytical Data
Quality Products Co.
1513 South Mint Street
Charlotte, North CarolinaBrownfields Project No. 22016-18-060
H&H Job No. LEH-004
Sample ID MP-6
Date
Units
VOCs (TO-15)
Acetone 280 272 418 NE NE
Benzene 0.824 J 0.683 J 1.77 12 160
Carbon Disulfide <0.060 <0.060 0.255 J 4,900 61,000
Chlorobenzene <0.107 <0.107 0.326 J 350 4,400
Chloroform 0.722 J 0.707 J 1.6 J 4.1 53
Cyclohexane <0.161 <0.161 1.68 J 42,000 530,000
1,4-Dichlorobenzene 4.70 4.68 <0.186 8.5 110
Dichlorodifluoromethane 3.11 3.00 2.96 700 8,800
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 2.14 2.19 2.95 NE NE
Ethylbenzene <0.106 <0.106 0.49 J 37 490
4-Ethyltoluene 4.22 4.29 4.25 NE NE
Heptane 3.34 <0.143 3.34 2,800 35,000
n-Hexane 2.01 <0.047 <0.047 4,900 61,000
Isopropyl Alchohol 5.37 B1 3.26 B1,J 3.78 B1,J 1,400 18,000
Methyl Ethyl Ketone (MEK)603 584 2,510 35,000 440,000
Methylene Chloride 5.01 3.82 3.38 3,400 53,000
Naphthalene 6.43 6.55 6.46 2.8 36
Propene 9.56 9.32 8.35 21,000 260,000
Styrene 0.451 J 0.494 J 2.23 7,000 88,000
Tetrachloroethene <0.181 <0.181 0.474 J 280 3,500
Tetrahydrofuran 692 670 2,580 14,000 180,000
Toluene 2.07 1.97 10.3 35,000 440,000
Trichloroethene 12.3 11.8 223 14 180
Trichlorofluoromethane 1.93 J 1.90 J 1.88 J NE NE
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 4.21 4.47 4.32 420 5,300
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 3.42 3.47 3.46 420 5,300
Vinyl Chloride <0.127 <0.127 <0.127 5.6 280
o-Xylene 2.81 2.92 3.06 700 8,800
mp-Xylene 0.499 J 0.655 J 1.04 J 700 8,800
Xylene (Total)3.31 J 3.58 J 4.1 J 700 8,800
DEQ Cumulative Risk Calculator(2)
Carcinogenic Risk (LICR)
Non-Carcinogenic Hazard Index (HI)
Notes:
1) NC Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) Division of Waste Management (DWM) Vapor Intrusion Sub-slab and Exterior Soil Gas Screening Levels (SGSLs) dated January 2023 and based upon TCR = 1 x 10-6 and THQ = 0.2.2) NC DEQ DWM Cumulative Risk Calculator dated January 2023
Compound concentrations are reported in micrograms per cubic meter (μg/m3)
Compound concentrations are reported to the laboratory method detection limits.Only those compounds detected in at least one sample, and select chlorinated solvents, are shown in the table above.Laboratory analytical method shown in parentheses.
Bold indicates compound concentration exceeds Residential SGSLs.Underline indicates compound concentration exceeds Non-Residential SGSLs.VOCs = Volatile Organic Compounds; NE = Not Established.TCR = Target Cancer Risk; THQ = Target Hazard Quotient.
LICR = Lifetime Incremental Cancer Risk; HI = Hazard Index.
Cumulative LICR and HI calculated using the residential worst-case scenario for each building and compared to DEQ and EPA acceptable risk levels for carcinogenic and non carcinogenic risks.
J = Compound was detected above the laboratory method detection limit, but below the laboratory reporting limit resulting in a laboratory estimated concentration.
Non-Residential SGSLs(1)
1.0 x 10-6
0.26
Non-Residential Worst Case
Residential SGSLs(1)
µg/m3
3/17/2023
MP-4 / MP-DUP
Acceptable Risk Levels
<1 x 10-4
<1.0
https://harthick.sharepoint.com/sites/MasterFiles-1/Shared Documents/AAA-Master Projects/Lischerong Enterprises and Holdings (LEH)/S. Mint St/VIMS Install Reports/1513 S Mint Upfit/Tables/1513_Sub Slab Sampling Data
3/23/2023
Table 1 (Page 1 of 1)
Hart & Hickman, PC
CCDNE
S
SDNEBBCCCCCBBOOOBBBBOOOOBBBUILDING 15375,328 SFFFE: 719.12BUILDING 15294,036 SFFFE: 721.41FFE: 723.54BUILDING 15257,235 SFFFE: 723.00FFE: 725.00BUILDING 15156,788 SFFFE: 725.27BUILDING 15135,248 SFFFE: 725.27725722724
72
3
726
729 728720717721
724 720719723
724725
726 719SOUTH MINT STREETWESTWOOD AVENUE720721
722
7237237
2
0
718719
721722723723
725725
723723723
724724
725
726
727 PROP. CONCRETE PAVEMENTTO BE FLUSH WITH EX.CONCRETE PAVEMENT, TYP.2% MAXIMUM CROSSSLOPE ON CROSSWALK.DUMPSTER PAD SHALLSLOPE TOWARDS ACCESSDRIVE AT 2.00% MAX SLOPE.SLOPE FOR HANDICAP ACCESSIBLESPACES SHALL NOT EXCEED 2% INANY DIRECTION, TYP.2:1 SLOPE MAX.BACKFLOW PREVENTERAREA SHALL BE GRADEDAT 2% MAX SLOPE.CONTRACTOR SHALL SLOPE CURB ANDGUTTER TO ENSURE POSITIVE DRAINAGETO DOWNSTREAM INLETS, TYP.PROP. DI-1RIM: 722.50INV OUT: 719.00 (MH-1)38.19 LF of 15"RCP @ 4.11%PROP. MH-1RIM: 719.37INV IN: 717.43 (DI-1)2% MAXIMUM CROSSSLOPE ON CROSSWALK.2% MAXIMUM CROSSSLOPE ON CROSSWALK.BACKFLOW PREVENTERAREA SHALL BE GRADEDAT 2% MAX SLOPE.DUMPSTER PAD SHALLSLOPE TOWARDS ACCESSDRIVE AT 2.00% MAX SLOPE.SLOPE FOR HANDICAP ACCESSIBLESPACES SHALL NOT EXCEED 2% INANY DIRECTION, TYP.EX: 718.20EX: 722.17EX: 722.56EX: 718.56EX: 723.20EX: 722.83EX: 723.17EX: 724.58EX: 727.98EX: 726.39EX: 726.97EX: 725.14EX: 722.92719.07719.07719.47719.12718.99719.67EX: 719.28719.87719.59719.61719.66720.92722.80723.25723.33723.50723.50723.50723.41722.49723.77723.78723.43EX: 723.15EX: 722.67EX: 720.37EX: 723.16721.40EX: 721.81721.41720.66719.24719.19719.15719.12719.12EX: 723.65EX: 723.45EX: 722.89EX: 722.02EX: 721.65EX: 721.62EX: 722.26EX: 721.16EX: 723.40EX: 723.94EX: 724.51EX: 724.80EX: 724.98722.81723.21723.00723.10723.00724.85725.00725.00724.90725.00724.95724.81725.42725.41725.54725.54725.21725.37725.53725.36EX: 719.15EX: 718.91EX: 718.79EX: 718.73EX: 718.99719.16719.22719.78725.27725.27724.98724.86725.26725.26BW: 725.27TW: 727.28725.27725.17724.96725.19725.40725.16725.40725.20724.11723.92723.73724.40723.87723.91723.97723.44723.70723.30722.73723.20LP: 722.65LP: 722.70CONTRACTOR SHALLENSURE SMOOTH VERTICALCURVES ARE USED AT ALLHIGH AND LOW POINTS.TYPICAL IN ALL AREAS.PROP. ASPHALT PAVEMENT TO BEFLUSH WITH EX. CONCRETE PAVEMENTALONG CLEAN SAWCUT, TYP.720.06PROP. BUILDING STAIRS, SEEARCHITECTURAL DETAILSTC: 723.08BC: 722.58TC: 721.22BC: 720.72stamp / seal:REVISIONSDATENO.DESCRIPTIONDisclaimer ©2019:Information contained in this document is the property of Bloc Design, PLLC.and the project client listed on this document.The reproduction, copying, and other use without written consent isprohibited and may be subject to legal action to the fullest extent possible.N.T.S.NS. Mint StreetRedevelopment1513, 1515, 1525, 1529 &1537 S. Mint St.Charlotte, NC 28203CHECKED BY:MPIC:CCB11/22/19DATE:DRAWN BY:PROJECT NUMBER:00658.01SCALE:TITLE:SHEET NO.:VICINITY MAPSURVEY DISCLAIMERTOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY DATED AUGUST 25, 2019 PROVIDED BY R.B.PHARR & ASSOSIATES, P.A., 420 HAWTHORNE LANE, CHARLOTTE,N.C. 28204. PHONE: [phone]P-1007C-390S:\Projects\00658 Mint St Redevelopment\Plans\Production DWGs\00658_CG-100 - Grading and Drainage Plan.dwg, 11/25/2019 8:37:54 AM, nic vesely, Bloc DesignISSUED FOR CONSTRUCTIONMANAGING PARTNER (PE): DATE:MANAGING PARTNER (LA):DATE:CIVIL ENGINEER/DESIGNER:DATE:LANDS. ARCHITECT/DESIGNER:DATE:2923 S. Tryon Street, Suite 320Charlotte, NC 28203phone: [phone]www.bloc-nc.comlandscape architecture I planning I civil engineering1.CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR PLACEMENT OF ALL BARRICADES,SIGNAGE, FLAGGERS, SHORING, ETC., TO ENSURE THE SAFETY OF WORKERSAND THE PUBLIC.2.ALL PAVEMENT CUTS SHALL BE REPLACED ACCORDING TO NORTH CAROLINADEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND CHARLOTTE WATER.PLAN NORTHTRUE NORTHNNLischerongDevelopment Group310 Arlington AveSuite #402-ACharlotte, NC 28203704-750-0368lischerongdevelopment.comREEENGINSEFOR
P
LANOISSEAL35711EXISTING CONTOURPROPOSED INDEX CONTOURPROPOSED SPOT ELEVATIONPROPOSED HIGH POINTHPSYMBOLEXISTING SPOT ELEVATIONPROPOSED DRAINAGE FLOW PATTERN625.00625.00LEGENDDETAILPROPOSED INTERIOR CONTOUR625624-/--/--/--/--/--/--/-GRADING NOTES:1.ANY GRADING BEYOND THE DENUDED LIMITS INDICATED ON THE CONSTRUCTIONDOCUMENTS IS A VIOLATION AND IS SUBJECT TO A FINE.2.GRADING MORE THAN ONE ACRE WITHOUT AN APPROVED EROSION CONTROL PLANIS A VIOLATION AND IS SUBJECT TO A FINE.3.CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN 0.50% SLOPE MINIMUM ON THE CURB AND GUTTERS4.THE AUTHORITIES HAVING JURISDICTION HAVE NOT REVIEWED AND ASSUME NORESPONSIBILITY FOR THE STRUCTURAL STABILITY OF ANY EXISTING RETAININGWALLS ONSITE.5.ALL PAVED AREAS (SIDEWALKS, PLAZAS, PATIOS, ETC.) SHALL SLOPE AWAY FROMTHE BUILDING AT 2.00% MINIMUM.6.SPOT GRADE ELEVATIONS ARE TAKEN AT FINISHED GRADE (ASPHALT, CONCRETE,TURF) UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.7.TC = TOP OF CURB ELEVATIONBC = BOTTOM OF CURB ELEVATION (GUTTER FLOW LINE)HP = HIGH POINTLP = LOW POINTEX = EXISTING SPOT ELEVATIONSCALE:020'40'10'1"= 20'PROPOSED STORM DRAINAGEPROPOSED CATCH BASIN INLETCBNCDOT 300.01NCDOT 840.02CCBNTVDSK1"=20'GRADING & DRAINAGE PLANCG-101
SSSSSSSDSDSDEWWWEEEEE WSDSDSDSSSSSSWGEGES33o16'59"E 150.03'S33o17'59"E 150.04'S33o18'53"E 150.04'N33o16'34"W 150.04N33o16'36"W 150.04'(M)50.08' (M)49.86 (M)50.01 (M)50.01' (M)N56o40'13"E 199.96' (T) (M)50.08' (M)49.87 (M)49.97' (M)49.97' (M)S56o40'07E 199.99' (T) (M)20' FRONT SETBACK10' SIDE SETBACKTAX PARCEL 119-083-01LOT 6, BLOCK 4WESTWOOD PARKM.B. 332, PG. 361MARTHA F. GAINEYD.B. 25356, PG.701SOUTH MINT STREETWESTWOOD AVENUETAX PARCEL 19-083-01LOT 8, BLOCK 4WESTWOOD PARKM.B. 332, PG. 361BEVERLY WELCHD.B. 1588, PG. 43110' ALLEYM.B.332, PG. 36110' ALLEYM.B.332, PG. 361EXISTING SINGLE STORYU SHELL BUILDING -PROPOSED BUILD-OUT PROPOSED METAL LANDING & EGRESS STAIR FROM NEW MEZZININE IN SHELL BUILDING TO EX'G COURTYARD BELOW.ASHPALT PARKING LOTEGRESS PATH OF TRAVELTAX PARCEL 119-083-102LOT 5, BLOCK 4WESTWOOD PARKM.B. 332, PG. 361MARTHA F GAINEYD.B. 25356, PG. 701S46o25'35"E 32.00'N56o40'07"E 99.94 (M)C1-485' RADIUS; 45.78' ARC LENGTH; N35o59'07"W CHORD BEARING ; 45.77' CHORD LENGTH N35o09'03"W 99.94 (M)S33o16'34"E 199.99' (T) (M)S56118'0"W 155.50' (M)20' SETBACK10' SETBACKEXISTING SINGLE-STORY BUILDINGEXISTING SINGLE-STORY BUILDINGEGRESS PATH OF TRAVEL20' - 0 1/8"5' - 9 1/8"5' - 2"10' - 1 1/2"17' - 6 1/4"17' - 8 11/16"10' - 6"EXISTING COURTYARD6' TALL WOOD FENCEPROPOSED ADDITIONPROJECT BUILDINGPROJECT ADDITIONEXISTING BUILDINGSPROJECT PARKINGLEGEND1513 SOUTH MINT STREET1515 SOUTH MINT STREETDUMPSTERNFile:Date:PROJECT NO.SCALEISSUED:DATE: FOR:SCHEMATIC DESIGNDESIGN DEVELOPMENTBIDDINGRELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION© CopyrightDesign BIM Group LLCAll rights reserved.ADDENDUM #1Design BIM Group LLC2615 George Busbee PkwySuite 11 - 357Kennesaw, Georgia 30144-1981Phone: [phone]REVISIONS:NO: DESCRIPTION:DATE:PROJECT NAME:CLIENT:Robert Herring Architect778 Registry Run NWKennesaw, Georgia 30152Phone: [phone]C:\Users\deanh\Documents\2-12-2022_2161_Hospitality Build Services_Trio_CF_AR_dhogencampXZBQQ.rvt2/15/2022 10:46:21 AM1" = 20'-0"ARCHITECTURALSITE PLAN2161A03090% SUBMITTAL- Not Released for Construction2022Hospitality Build ServicesTrio Concert Hall1513 S. Mint StreetCharlotte, NC 28203SCALE:1" = 20'-0"A0301ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN

Appendix A
Historical Data Summary Tables and Sample Location Maps

Table 1 (Page 1 of 2)Summary of Sub-Slab Soil Vapor Analytical Data1515-1521 South Mint StreetCharlotte, North CarolinaH&H Job No. LEH.004AcetoneBenzene2-Butanone (MEK)Carbon DisulfideChlorobenzeneChloroform1,3-Dichlorobenzene1,4-DichlorobenzeneDichlorodifluoromethane (Freon 12)1,1-Dichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylenecis-1,2-Dichloroethylenetrans-1,2-DichloroethyleneEthanolEthylbenzene4-EthyltolueneHeptaneSSV-1 QPC finished product shipping 8 4 01/26/18600 7.8 56 J 56 J<5.8728.4 J<8.3 <7.5140<5.8260 550 330 6.3 J<6.4430SSV-2 Former die stamping room 6 2-3 01/26/18200<4.118 J<4.2 <5.848<7.2 <8.3 <7.5 <5.7 <5.88.4<6.0150<5.8 <6.4 <5.4SSV-3 Former machine shop 8 4 01/26/18340 4.7 44 J 60 4.4 J<3.6 <3.6 <4.2 <3.734<2.980 46 120<2.97.0 3.8 JSSV-4 QPC finishing room 8 3 01/26/18240 1.0 22 J<0.42 <0.58 <0.712.4 1.7 2.3<0.578.1<0.54 <0.60140 0.73 J<0.640.92220,000 120 35,000 4,900 350 41 NE 85 700 580 1,400 NE NE NE 370 NE 2,8002,700,000 1,600 440,000 61,000 4,400 530 NE 1,100 8,800 7,700 18,000 NE NE NE 4,900 NE 35,000Notes: 1) North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) Division of Waste Management (DWM) Residential and Non-Residential Sub-Slab and Exterior Soil Gas Screening Levels (SGSLs) dated October 2017Only compounds detected in at least one sample are shownBold indicates concentration exceeds Residential SGSLUnderline indicates concentration exceeds Non-Residential SGSLJ = Detected concentration is above the laboratory method detection limit, but below the laboratory reporting limit. Therefore, the reported concentration is an estimated value.Z = compound fails the United States Environmental Protection Agency method requirement of 70-130% recovery, but passes the Con-Test Laboratory internal standard of 50-150%.µg/m3 = micrograms per cubic meter; NE = not established; in = inchesQPC = Quality Products Company, Inc., a metal stamping business that operated on the Site from approximately the 1950s until the 1980s Residential Soil Gas Screening Level1 Non-Residential Soil Gas Screening Level1Sample IDSample LocationSampling Date Analytical MethodTO-15Sample Depth (in)Slab Thickness (in)µg/m³File: S:\AAA-Master Projects\Lischerong Enterprises and Holdings (LEH)\S. Mint Street\Phase II\Tables\SubSlab_SoilVapor_TableDate: 2/9/2018Table 1 (Page 1 of 2)Hart & Hickman, PC
Table 1 (Page 2 of 2)Summary of Sub-Slab Soil Vapor Analytical Data1515-1521 South Mint StreetCharlotte, North CarolinaH&H Job No. LEH.004Hexane2-Hexanone (MBK)Isopropanol4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK)NaphthalenePropeneTetrachloroethylene (PCE)TetrahydrofuranToluene1,1,1-TrichloroethaneTrichloroethylene (TCE)Trichlorofluoromethane (Freon 11)1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene1,3,5-TrimethylbenzeneVinyl AcetateTotal XylenesSSV-1 QPC finished product shipping 8 4 01/26/18320<4.9120 J<7.0 <9.176 J 50 17 22 1,5007,700<9.429 9.4 J<4.335SSV-2 QPC die stamping room 6 2-3 01/26/18<12 <4.945 J<7.0 <9.114 J 21 4.7 J 5.3 J 5412,000<9.4 <6.4 <6.7 <4.3<16.4SSV-3 QPC machine shop 8 4 01/26/18<6.2 <2.456 J<3.522 Z22 J<4.18.8 8.2 18160<4.773 34<2.117.8SSV-4 QPC finishing room 8 3 01/26/18<1.20.84 53 1.4 1.5 Z<1.12904.5 2.6 880381.2 J 3.6<0.671.6 J3.74,900 210 1,400 21,000 21 21,000 280 14,000 35,000 35,000 14 NE 420 420 1,400 70061,000 2,600 18,000 260,000 260 260,000 3,500 180,000 440,000 440,000 180 NE 5,300 5,300 18,000 8,800Notes: 1) North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) Division of Waste Management (DWM) Residential and Non-Residential Sub-Slab and Exterior Soil Gas Screening Levels (SGSLs) dated October 2017Only compounds detected in at least one sample are shownBold indicates concentration exceeds Residential SGSLUnderline indicates concentration exceeds Non-Residential SGSLJ = Detected concentration is above the laboratory method detection limit, but below the laboratory reporting limit. Therefore, the reported concentration is an estimated value.Z = compound fails the United States Environmental Protection Agency method requirement of 70-130% recovery, but passes the Con-Test Laboratory internal standard of 50-150%.µg/m3 = micrograms per cubic meter; NE = not established; in = inchesQPC = Quality Products Company, Inc., a metal stamping business that operated on the Site from approximately the 1950s until the 1980sTO-15 Residential Soil Gas Screening Level1 Non-Residential Soil Gas Screening Level1µg/m³Sample IDSample LocationSample Depth (in)Slab Thickness (in)Sampling Date Analytical MethodFile: S:\AAA-Master Projects\Lischerong Enterprises and Holdings (LEH)\S. Mint Street\Phase II\Tables\SubSlab_SoilVapor_TableDate: 2/9/2018Table 1 (Page 2 of 2)Hart & Hickman, PC
Table 4Summary of Indoor Air Analytical ResultsQuality Products Company1513, 1515 and 1521 South Mint StreetCharlotte, North CarolinaH&H Job No. LEH.004Sample IDIAS-1IAS-3 IAS-4 BKG-1Sample LocationPirtek Lobby/ShowroomRCI Equipment/Storage AreaPirtek WorkshopWestern Property BoundarySampling Date 12/19/18 12/19/18 12/19/18 12/19/18UnitsVOCs (TO-15)Acetone1,900 290 290 350 4,100 296,500 27,000Benzene2.92.32.33.13.91.53.6162-Butanone (MEK)<0.167.4 J8.0 J9.6 J1102.9 J1,0004,400Carbon Disulfide0.72 J<0.21<0.21<0.21<0.43<0.075150610Carbon Tetrachloride<0.0720.33 J0.40 J0.53 J<0.410.454.720Chloroform<0.0640.36 J0.40 J0.562.10.11 J1.25.3Chloromethane<0.0491.51.92.03.51.51979Cyclohexane<0.0864.95.25.61300.761,3005,300Dichlorodifluoromethane (Freon 12)1.63.03.12.92.72.021881,2-Dichloroethane<0.054<0.15<0.15<0.15<0.310.080 J1.14.7Ethanol1703940469312NENEEthylbenzene3.33.63.74.65.10.6911494-Ethyltoluene4.83.23.34.55.20.80NENEHeptane2201616135002.883 350Hexane195.2 J5.6 J8.8 J432.7 J150610Isopropanol<0.114.1 J, L-034.4 J, L-035.5 J, L-034.5 J, L-034.3 L-0342180Methylene Chloride382.2 J3.0 J8.81.3 J131305304-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK)4.3<0.20<0.20<0.202.9<0.0696302,600Naphthalene2.51.01.21.5<0.800.250.632.6Styrene1.20.35 J0.460.60<0.530.42210880Tetrachloroethylene (PCE)1.8<0.38<0.38<0.381.2 J0.358.335Tetrahydrofuran<0.0692.42.74.5<0.390.244201,800Toluene1,6001301301103,000311,0004,400Trichloroethylene (TCE)4.415165.01.6<0.0760.42 1.8Trichlorofluoromethane (Freon 11)1.92.2 J2.32.1 J1.8 J1.8NENE1,1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-trifluoroethane (Freon 113)0.68 J0.48 J0.48 J<0.46<0.930.67 J1,0004,4001,2,4-Trimethylbenzene6.83.94.15.56.80.8813531,3,5-Trimethylbenzene1.70.991.11.41.60.251353m&p-Xylene12141420192.32188o-Xylene4.95.76.07.86.70.932188Notes: 1) North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) Division of Waste Management (DWM) Indoor Air Screening Levels (IASLs) dated Feburary 2018Only compounds detected in at least one sample are shownLaboratory analytical method shown in parentheses.Bold indicates concentration exceeds Residential IASLUnderline indicates concentration exceeds Non-Residential IASLJ = compound detected above the laboratory method detection limit, but below the laboratory reporting limit resulting in an estimated concentration.L-03 = Laboratory fortified blank/laboratory control sample recovery is outside of control limits. Reported value for this compound is likely to be biased on the low side.µg/m3 = micrograms per cubic meter; NE = not establishedµg/m3IAS-2 (DUP-1 ) Residential IASL1 Non-Residential IASL1RCI Demolition Office Space12/19/18File: S:\AAA-Master Projects\Lischerong Enterprises and Holdings (LEH)\S. Mint Street\1513-1521 Assessments\Brownfields Assessment\Report\Tables\Indoor Air_Table - amDate: 10/21/2019Table 4 (Page 1 of 1)Hart & Hickman, PC
PIRTEK
SOUTHEND
SSV-1
SSV-4
SSV-3
SSV-2
SB-1RCI DEMOL
I
T
IONVACAN
T
REVISION NO. 0DATE: 10-17-19
LEGEND
BROWNFIELDS PROPERTY BOUNDARY
FORMER BUILDING FOOTPRINT
PREVIOUS SOIL GAS SAMPLE
LOCATION
PREVIOUS SOIL SAMPLE LOCATION
2923 South Tryon Street-Suite 100
Charlotte, North Carolina 28203
704-586-0007(p) 704-586-0373(f)
License # C-1269 / #C-245 Geology
JOB NO. LEH-004 FIGURE NO. 3
QUALITY PRODUCTS COMPANY
1513, 1515, AND 1521 S. MINT STREET
CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA
PREVIOUS SAMPLE LOCATION MAP
NOTES:
1.AERIAL IMAGERY OBTAINED FROM MECKLENBURG CO. GIS
(2019).
2.PREVIOUS SAMPLES COLLECTED BY H&H ON 1/26/18.
W
.

S
U
M
M
I
T

S
T
R
E
E
T
WESTWOOD AVENUE
S. MI
N
T
S
T
R
E
E
T
FORMER MACHINE
REPAIR FACILITY
FORMER RAY'S GULF/
RAY'S AUTO
FORMER AUTOMOTIVE
REPAIR FACILITY
FORMER AUTOMOTIVE
JUNKYARD SALES OFFICE
FORMER AUTOMOTIVE
REPAIR FACILITY
FORMER FURNACE ROOM
(1950s-1980s)
FORMER DIE STAMPING AREA
(1940s-1980s)
FORMER TIN SHOP (1940s & 1950s)
FINISHING ROOM (1960s-1980s)
FORMER MACHINE SHOP
(1960s-1980s)
FORMER AUTOMOTIVE
REPAIR FACILITY
FORMER AUTOMOTIVE
REPAIR FACILITY
FORMER AUTOMOTIVE
JUNKYARD STORAGE YARD
FORMER MACHINE SHOP
FORMER PAINT BOOTH (1960s-1980s)
FORMER FINISHED
PRODUCT & SHIPPING
(1960s-1980s)
OBSERVED STAINING
S:\AAA-Master Projects\Lischerong Enterprises and Holdings (LEH)\S. Mint Street\1513-1521 Assessments\Brownfields Assessment\Report\Figures\Brownfields Assessment Maps.dwg, 10/18/2019 8:57:20 AM, amckenzie
IAS-3
IAS-4
IAS-2
IAS-1BKG-1 RCI DEMOL
I
T
IONVACAN
T
REVISION NO. 0DATE: 10-17-19
LEGEND
BROWNFIELDS PROPERTY BOUNDARY
FORMER BUILDING FOOTPRINT
INDOOR AIR SAMPLE / BACKGROUND
SAMPLE LOCATION
2923 South Tryon Street-Suite 100
Charlotte, North Carolina 28203
704-586-0007(p) 704-586-0373(f)
License # C-1269 / #C-245 Geology
JOB NO. LEH-004 FIGURE NO. 7
QUALITY PRODUCTS COMPANY
1513, 1515, AND 1521 S. MINT STREET
CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA
INDOOR AIR SAMPLE LOCATION MAP
NOTES:
1. AERIAL IMAGERY OBTAINED FROM MECKLENBURG CO. GIS
(2019).
2. INDOOR AIR SAMPLES COLLECTED BY H&H ON 12/19/18.
S. MI
N
T
S
T
R
E
E
T
W
.

S
U
M
M
I
T

S
T
R
E
E
T
WESTWOOD AVENUE
PIRTEK
SOUTHEND
S:\AAA-Master Projects\Lischerong Enterprises and Holdings (LEH)\S. Mint Street\1513-1521 Assessments\Brownfields Assessment\Report\Figures\FIGS 5, 6, 7 - SOIL AND GW SAMPLE LOCATION MAP, POTENTIOMETRIC SURFACE MAP, AND INDOOR AIR LOCATION MAP.dwg, 10/17/2019 9:00:22 AM, amckenzie

Appendix B
VIMS As-Built Drawings

SEE DETAIL 1/VM-2
SEE DETAIL 6 & 8/VM-2 SEE DETAIL 5/VM-2
SEE DETAIL 3/VM-2 SEE DETAIL 4 & 8/VM-2
SEE DETAIL 2/VM-2
SEE DETAIL 7/VM-2
1515 S. MINT ST
TENANT SPACE
NEW CONCRETE
FOOTING
1513 S. MINT ST
TENANT SPACE
PREVIOUSLY EXISTING SUB-GRADE INTERIOR
RAMP REMOVED AND BROUGHT TO GRADE
USING BACKFILL AND BASE COURSE TO MATCH
SURROUNDINGS - VIMS PIPING IS ON SAME
GRADE AS REST OF VIMS PIPING.
SEE DETAIL 2/VM-2
SEE DETAIL 9/VM-2
SEE DETAIL 9/VM-2
SEE DETAIL 9/VM-2
REVISION NO. 1DATE: 3-27-23
2923 South Tryon Street-Suite 100
Charlotte, North Carolina 28203
704-586-0007(p) 704-586-0373(f)
License # C-1269 / #C-245 Geology
JOB NO. LEH-004 FIGURE NO. VM-1
1513-1515 S. MINT STREET
CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA
VIMS AS-BUILT LAYOUT
VIMS SPECIFICATIONS
1. VIMS VAPOR BARRIER IN THE 1513 S. MINT STREET TENANT SPACE IS VAPORBLOCK PLUS 20
MANUFACTURED BY RAVEN INDUSTRIES.
THE VAPOR BARRIER WAS INSTALLED AS SPECIFIED HEREIN AND PER MANUFACTURER
INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS TO CREATE A CONTINUOUS BARRIER BELOW GROUND FLOOR
SLABS AND ATTACHED/SEALED TO CONCRETE SURFACES OF FOOTINGS AND EXTERIOR/EXISTINGWALLS. A MINIMUM 5-INCH THICK BASE COURSE CONSISTING OF CLEAN #57 STONE WAS
INSTALLED BENEATH THE VIMS VAPOR BARRIER.
2. HORIZONTAL COLLECTION PIPE CONSISTS OF 4-INCH SCH 40 PVC (OR OTHERWISE NOTED IN THEDRAWINGS). SUB-SLAB SLOTTED VAPOR COLLECTION PIPE IS THREADED FLUSH JOINT OR SLIP
JOINT 4-INCH SCH 40 PVC PIPE WITH 0.020-INCH SLOT WIDTH AND 1/8-INCH SLOT SPACING. VIMSBELOW AND ABOVE GRADE SOLID PIPING IS NOT TRAPPED AND IS SLOPED A MINIMUM OF 1/8 UNIT
VERTICAL IN 12 UNITS HORIZONTAL (1% SLOPE) TO GRAVITY DRAIN. SOLID SECTIONS OF
HORIZONTAL COLLECTION PIPE WAS SUPPORTED TO PREVENT PIPE SAG OR LOW POINT AND
MAINTAIN 1% SLOPE TOWARD SLOTTED SECTIONS TO DRAIN CONDENSATION. TRACER WIRE WAS
PLACED ALONG HORIZONTAL PIPE BELOW VAPOR BARRIER TO LOCATE PIPE DURING FUTURE
BUILDING MODIFICATIONS.
3. 4-INCH SCH 40 PVC RISER DUCT PIPING WAS INSTALLED TO CONNECT EACH SLAB PENETRATION
LOCATION TO A ROOFTOP EXHAUST DISCHARGE POINT WITH TURBINE FAN (SEE SPECIFICATION#4). ABOVE-SLAB RISER DUCT PIPE RUNS BETWEEN THE SLAB PENETRATION AND THE ROOFTOP
EXHAUST DISCHARGE WAS INSTALLED PER APPLICABLE BUILDING CODE AND AS SPECIFIED INTHE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS AND DRAWINGS.
4. RISER DUCT PIPING EXTENDS IN A VERTICAL ORIENTATION THROUGH THE BUILDING ROOF AND
TERMINATES A MINIMUM OF 2 FT ABOVE ANY WALLS, PARAPETS, ETC. IN THE VICINITY OF THERISER/FAN. AN EMPIRE MODEL TV04SS TURBINE VENTILATOR FAN WAS INSTALLED ON THE
EXHAUST DISCHARGE END OF EACH MINIMUM OF 10 FT FROM ANY OPERABLE OPENING OR AIRINTAKE INTO THE BUILDING. NOTE THAT DISCHARGE LOCATIONS ON THE ROOFTOP DEPICTED IN
THE VAPOR MITIGATION PLAN MAY HAVE BEEN REPOSITIONED AS LONG AS THE NEW POSITION
MET THE REQUIREMENTS PRESENTED ABOVE. A 4-INCH COUPLING WAS INSTALLED AT THE
DISCHARGE END OF THE 4-INCH RISER DUCT PIPE AND THE FAN IS SECURED TO THE PVC RISER IN
A VERTICAL ORIENTATION. AN ELECTRICAL JUNCTION BOX (120V, 60HZ AC REQUIRED) WAS
INSTALLED NEAR THE FAN LOCATION ON THE ROOFTOP FOR CONVERSION TO ELECTRIC FANS, IF
REQUIRED. ALL WIRING AND ELECTRICAL WAS INSTALLED PER APPLICABLE BUILDING AND
ELECTRICAL CODES.
5. ABOVE-SLAB ACCESSIBLE RISER DUCT PIPING IS PERMANENTLY IDENTIFIED BY MEANS OF A TAGOR STENCIL AT A MINIMUM OF ONCE EVERY 10-LINEAR FT WITH "VAPOR MITIGATION SYSTEM -
CONTACT MAINTENANCE.”6. MONITORING POINTS CONSIST OF 2-INCH DIAMETER SCH 40 PVC PIPE WITH A 90-DEGREE ELBOW
TO FORM AN "L" SHAPE. A MINIMUM OF 6" SECTION OF PIPING IS SET WITHIN THE BASE COURSELAYER WITH AN OPEN-ENDED PIPE OR PIPE PROTECTION SCREEN AT THE TERMINATION. THE PIPE
TERMINATION IS ENCASED WITHIN THE BASE COURSE LAYER. THE HORIZONTAL PIPING WASSLOPED A MINIMUM OF 1/8 UNIT VERTICAL BY 12 UNITS HORIZONTAL (1% SLOPE) TO GRAVITY
DRAIN TOWARDS THE PIPE TERMINATION AND PREVENT MOISTURE FROM COLLECTING AT THE90-DEGREE ELBOW. A 4-INCH DIAMETER ADJUSTABLE FLOOR CLEAN-OUT (ZURN INDUSTRIES
MODEL #CO2450-PV4, OR EQUIVALENT) WAS INSTALLED AND SET FLUSH WITH THE FINISHEDCONCRETE SURFACE. MONITORING POINT INTAKE IS A MINIMUM 5-FT FROM EXTERIOR FOOTING.
7. THIS VIMS PLAN WAS INTENDED TO BE USED FOR DIRECTION OF VIMS COMPONENT INSTALLATION
ONLY AND WAS NOT INTENDED TO GUIDE CONSTRUCTION OF STRUCTURAL COMPONENTS NOTRELATED TO THE VIMS. CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTOR VERIFIED CONSISTENCY OF VIMS DETAILS
WITH APPLICABLE STRUCTURAL, ARCHITECTURAL, MECHANICAL, AND PLUMBING PLANS ANDRESOLVED ANY INCONSISTENCIES PRIOR TO VIMS INSTALLATION.
8. INSPECTIONS: INSPECTIONS OF EACH COMPONENT OF THE VIMS WAS CONDUCTED BY THE
ENGINEER, OR ENGINEER'S DESIGNEE, TO CONFIRM VIMS COMPONENTS WERE INSTALLED PERTHE APPROVED DESIGN. THE REQUIRED INSPECTION COMPONENTS INCLUDED: (1) INSPECTION
OF SUB-SLAB PIPING LAYOUT, (2) GRAVEL PLACEMENT, AND (3) MONITORING POINT PLACEMENTPRIOR TO INSTALLING VAPOR BARRIER; (4) INSPECTION OF VAPOR BARRIER PRIOR TO POURING
CONCRETE; (5) INSPECTION OF ABOVE-GRADE PIPING LAYOUT; AND (6) INSPECTION OF TURBINEFANS AND RISER DUCT PIPE CONNECTIONS. INSPECTIONS WERE COMBINED WHEN POSSIBLE
DEPENDING ON THE CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE/SCHEDULE. THE CONSTRUCTION
CONTRACTOR(S) COORDINATED WITH THE ENGINEER TO PERFORM THE REQUIRED INSPECTIONS.
DEQ WAS CONTACTED 48-HOURS PRIOR TO THE INSPECTION BEING CONDUCTED. FIELD NOTES,
PHOTOGRAPHS, AND ANY ADDITIONAL INSPECTION DOCUMENTATION ARE INCLUDED IN THE FINAL
DELIVERABLE TO DEQ.
9. CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTORS AND SUB-CONTRACTORS USED "LOW OR NO VOC" PRODUCTS
AND MATERIALS, WHEN POSSIBLE. THE CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTOR AND SUB-CONTRACTORS
PROVIDED SAFETY DATA SHEETS (SDS) TO THE ENGINEER FOR PRODUCTS AND MATERIALS USED
DURING CONSTRUCTION. SDS SHEETS ARE INCLUDED IN FINAL REPORTING TO DEQ.
10. CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTORS AND SUB-CONTRACTORS AVOIDED THE USE OF TEMPORARY
FORM BOARDS OR HOLLOW PIPING (TYPICALLY USED TO SUPPORT UTILITIES PRIOR TO SLAB
POURS) THAT PENETRATE THE VAPOR BARRIER WHERE POSSIBLE. IF TEMPORARY FORM BOARDS
WERE USED, THE SIZE AND NUMBER OF PENETRATIONS THROUGH THE VAPOR BARRIER WERE
LIMITED AND SMALL DIAMETER STAKES (I.E. METAL STAKES) WERE USED. IN ALL CASES, AS FORM
BOARDS ARE REMOVED, THE CONTRACTOR OR SUB-CONTRACTORS SEALED ALL PENETRATIONS
IN ACCORDANCE WITH VAPOR BARRIER MANUFACTURER INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS.
LEGEND
EXTENT OF VAPOR BARRIER - SEE SPECIFICATION #1
4-INCH SLOTTED SCH 40 PVC PIPE
4-INCH SOLID SCH 40 PVC PIPE
4-INCH SCH 40 PVC RISER WITH WIND DRIVEN TURBINE AT
TERMINUS ON ROOF
4-INCH SOLID CAST IRON RISER WITH WIND DRIVEN TURBINE AT
TERMINUS ON ROOF
2" DIA SOLID PVC PRESSURE MONITORING POINT WITH
FLUSH-MOUNTED COVER (INTAKE POSITIONED MINIMUM 5-FT
FROM EXTERIOR FOOTING)
COMPLETED PORTION OF BUILDING (1515 S. MINT STREET)
3/27/23
MP-3 MP-2
MP-1
F-2
F-1F-3
F-5
F-4F-6
MP-4
MP-5
MP-6
S:\AAA-Master Projects\Lischerong Enterprises and Holdings (LEH)\S. Mint St\VIMS Install Reports\1513 S Mint Upfit\Figures\Figures_VMP_As-Built.dwg, VM-1, 3/27/2023 10:06:13 AM, jlima
VIMS AT EXTERIOR WALL (TYPICAL)
NTS
3
CONCRETE
FLOOR SLAB
BASE COURSE
(SEE SPECIFICATION #1)
EXISTING CONCRETE
FOOTING (FIELD VERIFY)
EXISTING CMU WALL
EXISTING EXTERIOR
BRICK WALL
SUBBASE
VAPOR BARRIER
(SEE SPECIFICATION #1)
VAPOR BARRIER
SEALED TO CONCRETE
PER MANUFACTURERS
INSTRUCTIONS
VM-2
INTERFACE OF STEEL COLUMN AND
CONCRETE SEALED WITH
SELF-LEVELING POLYURETHANE
SEALANT
VIMS AT EXTERIOR WALL WITH RISER PIPE PENETRATION (TYPICAL)
NTS
4
CONCRETE
FLOOR SLAB
EXISTING CONCRETE
FOOTING (FIELD VERIFY)
EXISTING CMU WALL
EXISTING EXTERIOR
BRICK WALL
SUBBASE
VAPOR BARRIER PENETRATION SEALED TO
PIPE PER MANUFACTURERS INSTRUCTIONS
TO EXHAUST
POINT ON ROOF
4" SCH 40 PVC
90° ELBOW
BASE COURSE
(SEE SPECIFICATION #1)
4" SCH SOLID PVC PIPE SET
WITHIN 5" BASE COURSE
(SEE SPECIFICATION #2)
VAPOR BARRIER
SEALED TO CONCRETE
PER MANUFACTURERS
INSTRUCTIONS
4" SCH 40 PVC PIPE
VM-2
VIMS AT EXISTING INTERIOR CMU WALL (TYPICAL)
NTS
5
CONCRETE
FLOOR SLAB
BASE COURSE
(SEE SPECIFICATION #1)
EXISTING CMU WALL
SUBBASE
VAPOR BARRIER
(SEE SPECIFICATION #1)
VAPOR BARRIER
SEALED TO CONCRETE
PER MANUFACTURERS
INSTRUCTIONS
VM-2
INTERFACE OF STEEL COLUMN AND
CONCRETE SEALED WITH
SELF-LEVELING POLYURETHANE
SEALANT
VIMS VAPOR BARRIER AND BASE COURSE (TYPICAL)1
BASE COURSE - CLEAN #57 STONE
MIN 5" THICK BENEATH VAPOR BARRIER (SEE
SPECIFICATION #1)
VAPOR BARRIER (SEE SPECIFICATION #1)
CONCRETE FLOOR SLAB
SUBBASE
NTSVM-2
VIMS SLOTTED COLLECTION PIPE (TYPICAL)2
4" SCH 40 THREADED FLUSH JOINT
SLOTTED PVC PIPE (0.020" SLOT WIDTH,
1/8" SLOT SPACING)
SET WITHIN MIN 5" BASE COURSE
(SEE SPECIFICATION #2)
VAPOR BARRIER (SEE SPECIFICATION #1)
SUBBASE
NTS
CONCRETE FLOOR SLAB
VM-2
VIMS AT EXISTING INTERIOR CMU WALL WITH RISER PIPE PENETRATION (TYPICAL)
NTS
6
EXISTING CMU WALL
SUBBASE
VAPOR BARRIER SEALED TO
CONCRETE PER
MANUFACTURERS INSTRUCTIONS
BASE COURSE
(SEE SPECIFICATION #1)
4" SCH 40 PVC
90° ELBOW
4" SCH SOLID PVC PIPE SET WITHIN 5"
BASE COURSE (SEE SPECIFICATION #2)
VAPOR BARRIER PENETRATION SEALED TO
PIPE PER MANUFACTURERS INSTRUCTIONS
VAPOR BARRIER
(SEE SPECIFICATION #1)
CONCRETE
FLOOR SLAB
TO EXHAUST
POINT ON ROOF
TO SLOTTED HORIZONTAL
COLLECTION PIPING
4" SCH 40 PVC PIPE
VM-2
INTERFACE OF CMU WALL AND CONCRETE
SEALED WITH SELF-LEVELING POLYURETHANE
SEALANT
VIMS TURBINE FAN & EXHAUST (TYPICAL)8
NTS
TURBINE FAN
(EMPIRE MODEL TV04SS OR APPROVED EQUIVALENT)
ELECTRICAL JUNCTION BOX FOR POTENTIAL FUTURE
VACUUM FAN (SEE SPECIFICATION #4)
4" SCH 40 PVC THROUGH ROOF
FLASHING
ROOFTOP
VM-2
4" SCH SOLID PVC PIPE SET
WITHIN 5" BASE COURSE
(SEE SPECIFICATION #2)
VAPOR BARRIER PENETRATION SEALED TO
PIPE PER MANUFACTURERS INSTRUCTIONS
4" SCH 40
PVC 90°
ELBOW
TO EXHAUST
POINT ON ROOF
TO SLOTTED HORIZONTAL
COLLECTION PIPING
VIMS AT STEEL COLUMN (TYPICAL)
NTS
7
VM-2
EXTERIOR GRADE
STEEL COLUMN
ANCHORED TO FOOTING
4" SCH 40 PVC PIPE
VAPOR BARRIER
(SEE SPECIFICATION #1)
BASE COURSE
(SEE SPECIFICATION #1)
SUBBASE
NEW FOOTING
INTERFACE OF STEEL
COLUMN/EXISTING WALL
AND CONCRETE SEALED
WITH SELF-LEVELING
POLYURETHANE SEALANT
FINISHED FLOOR SLAB
2" SCH 40 PVC SET WITHIN GRAVEL LAYER
2" DRAIN EXPANSION TEST PLUG
VIMS MONITORING POINT - TYPICAL DETAIL VIEW
NTS
9
VM-2
VAPOR BARRIER PENETRATION SEALED TO
PIPE PER MANUFACTURER INSTRUCTIONS
2" SCH 40 PVC 90 DEGREE ELBOW
FLOOR CLEANOUT, ADJUSTABLE, 4" DIA ZURN
INDUSTRIES MODEL #CO2450-PV4 (OR ENGINEER
APPROVED EQUIVALENT) FLUSH WITH FINISHED FLOOR
BASE COURSE
4" x 2" FLUSH REDUCER
BUSHING
OPEN-ENDED PIPE
REVISION NO. 1DATE: 3-27-23
2923 South Tryon Street-Suite 100
Charlotte, North Carolina 28203
704-586-0007(p) 704-586-0373(f)
License # C-1269 / #C-245 Geology
CROSS SECTION DETAILS
JOB NO. LEH-004 FIGURE NO. VM-2
1513-1515 S. MINT STREET
CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA
VIMS SPECIFICATIONS
1. VIMS VAPOR BARRIER IN THE 1513 S. MINT STREET TENANT SPACE IS VAPORBLOCK PLUS 20
MANUFACTURED BY RAVEN INDUSTRIES.
THE VAPOR BARRIER WAS INSTALLED AS SPECIFIED HEREIN AND PER MANUFACTURER INSTALLATION
INSTRUCTIONS TO CREATE A CONTINUOUS BARRIER BELOW GROUND FLOOR SLABS AND
ATTACHED/SEALED TO CONCRETE SURFACES OF FOOTINGS AND EXTERIOR/EXISTING WALLS. A
MINIMUM 5-INCH THICK BASE COURSE CONSISTING OF CLEAN #57 STONE WAS INSTALLED BENEATH
THE VIMS VAPOR BARRIER.
2. HORIZONTAL COLLECTION PIPE CONSISTS OF 4-INCH SCH 40 PVC (OR OTHERWISE NOTED IN THE
DRAWINGS). SUB-SLAB SLOTTED VAPOR COLLECTION PIPE IS THREADED FLUSH JOINT OR SLIP JOINT
4-INCH SCH 40 PVC PIPE WITH 0.020-INCH SLOT WIDTH AND 1/8-INCH SLOT SPACING. VIMS BELOW AND
ABOVE GRADE SOLID PIPING IS NOT TRAPPED AND IS SLOPED A MINIMUM OF 1/8 UNIT VERTICAL IN 12
UNITS HORIZONTAL (1% SLOPE) TO GRAVITY DRAIN. SOLID SECTIONS OF HORIZONTAL COLLECTION
PIPE WAS SUPPORTED TO PREVENT PIPE SAG OR LOW POINT AND MAINTAIN 1% SLOPE TOWARD
SLOTTED SECTIONS TO DRAIN CONDENSATION. TRACER WIRE WAS PLACED ALONG HORIZONTAL PIPE
BELOW VAPOR BARRIER TO LOCATE PIPE DURING FUTURE BUILDING MODIFICATIONS.
3. 4-INCH SCH 40 PVC RISER DUCT PIPING WAS INSTALLED TO CONNECT EACH SLAB PENETRATION
LOCATION TO A ROOFTOP EXHAUST DISCHARGE POINT WITH TURBINE FAN (SEE SPECIFICATION #4).
ABOVE-SLAB RISER DUCT PIPE RUNS BETWEEN THE SLAB PENETRATION AND THE ROOFTOP EXHAUST
DISCHARGE WAS INSTALLED PER APPLICABLE BUILDING CODE AND AS SPECIFIED IN THE
CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS AND DRAWINGS.
4. RISER DUCT PIPING EXTENDS IN A VERTICAL ORIENTATION THROUGH THE BUILDING ROOF AND
TERMINATES A MINIMUM OF 2 FT ABOVE ANY WALLS, PARAPETS, ETC. IN THE VICINITY OF THE
RISER/FAN. AN EMPIRE MODEL TV04SS TURBINE VENTILATOR FAN WAS INSTALLED ON THE EXHAUST
DISCHARGE END OF EACH MINIMUM OF 10 FT FROM ANY OPERABLE OPENING OR AIR INTAKE INTO THE
BUILDING. NOTE THAT DISCHARGE LOCATIONS ON THE ROOFTOP DEPICTED IN THE VAPOR
MITIGATION PLAN MAY HAVE BEEN REPOSITIONED AS LONG AS THE NEW POSITION MET THE
REQUIREMENTS PRESENTED ABOVE. A 4-INCH COUPLING WAS INSTALLED AT THE DISCHARGE END OF
THE 4-INCH RISER DUCT PIPE AND THE FAN IS SECURED TO THE PVC RISER IN A VERTICAL
ORIENTATION. AN ELECTRICAL JUNCTION BOX (120V, 60HZ AC REQUIRED) WAS INSTALLED NEAR THE
FAN LOCATION ON THE ROOFTOP FOR CONVERSION TO ELECTRIC FANS, IF REQUIRED. ALL WIRING
AND ELECTRICAL WAS INSTALLED PER APPLICABLE BUILDING AND ELECTRICAL CODES.
5. ABOVE-SLAB ACCESSIBLE RISER DUCT PIPING IS PERMANENTLY IDENTIFIED BY MEANS OF A TAG OR
STENCIL AT A MINIMUM OF ONCE EVERY 10-LINEAR FT WITH "VAPOR MITIGATION SYSTEM - CONTACT
MAINTENANCE.”
6. MONITORING POINTS CONSIST OF 2-INCH DIAMETER SCH 40 PVC PIPE WITH A 90-DEGREE ELBOW TO
FORM AN "L" SHAPE. A MINIMUM OF 6" SECTION OF PIPING IS SET WITHIN THE BASE COURSE LAYERWITH AN OPEN-ENDED PIPE OR PIPE PROTECTION SCREEN AT THE TERMINATION. THE PIPE
TERMINATION IS ENCASED WITHIN THE BASE COURSE LAYER. THE HORIZONTAL PIPING WAS SLOPEDA MINIMUM OF 1/8 UNIT VERTICAL BY 12 UNITS HORIZONTAL (1% SLOPE) TO GRAVITY DRAIN TOWARDS
THE PIPE TERMINATION AND PREVENT MOISTURE FROM COLLECTING AT THE 90-DEGREE ELBOW. A
4-INCH DIAMETER ADJUSTABLE FLOOR CLEAN-OUT (ZURN INDUSTRIES MODEL #CO2450-PV4, OR
EQUIVALENT) WAS INSTALLED AND SET FLUSH WITH THE FINISHED CONCRETE SURFACE. MONITORING
POINT INTAKE IS A MINIMUM 5-FT FROM EXTERIOR FOOTING.
7. THIS VIMS PLAN WAS INTENDED TO BE USED FOR DIRECTION OF VIMS COMPONENT INSTALLATION
ONLY AND WAS NOT INTENDED TO GUIDE CONSTRUCTION OF STRUCTURAL COMPONENTS NOT
RELATED TO THE VIMS. CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTOR VERIFIED CONSISTENCY OF VIMS DETAILS
WITH APPLICABLE STRUCTURAL, ARCHITECTURAL, MECHANICAL, AND PLUMBING PLANS AND
RESOLVED ANY INCONSISTENCIES PRIOR TO VIMS INSTALLATION.
8. INSPECTIONS: INSPECTIONS OF EACH COMPONENT OF THE VIMS WAS CONDUCTED BY THE
ENGINEER, OR ENGINEER'S DESIGNEE, TO CONFIRM VIMS COMPONENTS WERE INSTALLED PER THE
APPROVED DESIGN. THE REQUIRED INSPECTION COMPONENTS INCLUDED: (1) INSPECTION OF
SUB-SLAB PIPING LAYOUT, (2) GRAVEL PLACEMENT, AND (3) MONITORING POINT PLACEMENT PRIOR
TO INSTALLING VAPOR BARRIER; (4) INSPECTION OF VAPOR BARRIER PRIOR TO POURING CONCRETE;
(5) INSPECTION OF ABOVE-GRADE PIPING LAYOUT; AND (6) INSPECTION OF TURBINE FANS AND RISER
DUCT PIPE CONNECTIONS. INSPECTIONS WERE COMBINED WHEN POSSIBLE DEPENDING ON THE
CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE/SCHEDULE. THE CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTOR(S) COORDINATED WITH
THE ENGINEER TO PERFORM THE REQUIRED INSPECTIONS. DEQ WAS CONTACTED 48-HOURS PRIOR
TO THE INSPECTION BEING CONDUCTED. FIELD NOTES, PHOTOGRAPHS, AND ANY ADDITIONAL
INSPECTION DOCUMENTATION ARE INCLUDED IN THE FINAL DELIVERABLE TO DEQ.
9. CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTORS AND SUB-CONTRACTORS USED "LOW OR NO VOC" PRODUCTS AND
MATERIALS, WHEN POSSIBLE. THE CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTOR AND SUB-CONTRACTORS PROVIDED
SAFETY DATA SHEETS (SDS) TO THE ENGINEER FOR PRODUCTS AND MATERIALS USED DURING
CONSTRUCTION. SDS SHEETS ARE INCLUDED IN FINAL REPORTING TO DEQ.
10. CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTORS AND SUB-CONTRACTORS AVOIDED THE USE OF TEMPORARY FORM
BOARDS OR HOLLOW PIPING (TYPICALLY USED TO SUPPORT UTILITIES PRIOR TO SLAB POURS) THAT
PENETRATE THE VAPOR BARRIER WHERE POSSIBLE. IF TEMPORARY FORM BOARDS WERE USED, THE
SIZE AND NUMBER OF PENETRATIONS THROUGH THE VAPOR BARRIER WERE LIMITED AND SMALL
DIAMETER STAKES (I.E. METAL STAKES) WERE USED. IN ALL CASES, AS FORM BOARDS ARE REMOVED,
THE CONTRACTOR OR SUB-CONTRACTORS SEALED ALL PENETRATIONS IN ACCORDANCE WITH
VAPOR BARRIER MANUFACTURER INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS.
3/27/23
S:\AAA-Master Projects\Lischerong Enterprises and Holdings (LEH)\S. Mint St\VIMS Install Reports\1513 S Mint Upfit\Figures\VIMP-Details_As-Built.dwg, VM-2, 3/27/2023 10:09:08 AM, jlima

Appendix C
Product Specification Sheets
PRODUCT PART #
VaporBlock® Plus™ 20 ................................................................ VBP20
UNDER-SLAB VAPOR / GAS BARRIER
Under-Slab Vapor/Gas Retarder
© 2018 RAVEN INDUSTRIES INC. All rights reserved.
VAPORBLOCK® PLUS™VBP20
PRODUCT DESCRIPTION
VaporBlock® Plus™ is a seven-layer co-extruded barrier
made using high quality virgin-grade polyethylene and
EVOH resins to provide unmatched impact strength as well
as superior resistance to gas and moisture transmission.
VaporBlock® Plus™ 20 is more than 100 times less permeable
than typical high-performance polyethylene vapor retarders
against Methane, Radon, and other harmful VOCs. Tested and
verified for unsurpassed protection against BTEX, HS, TCE, PCE,
methane, radon, other toxic chemicals and odors.
VaporBlock® Plus™ 20 multi-layer gas barrier is manufactured
with the latest EVOH barrier technology to mitigate hazardous
vapor intrusion from damaging indoor air quality, and the safety
and health of building occupants. VBP20 is one of the most
effective underslab gas barriers in the building industry today
far exceeding ASTM E-1745 (Plastic Water Vapor Retarders
Used in Contact with Soil or Granular Fill Under Concrete Slabs)
Class A, B and C requirements. Available in a 20 (Class A) mil
thicknesses designed to meet the most stringent requirements.
VaporBlock® Plus™ 20 is produced within the strict guidelines
of our ISO 9001 Certified Management System.
PRODUCT USE
VaporBlock® Plus™ 20 resists gas and moisture migration
into the building envelop when properly installed to provide
protection from toxic/harmful chemicals. It can be installed as
part of a passive or active control system extending across the
entire building including floors, walls and crawl spaces. When
installed as a passive system it is recommended to also include
a ventilated system with sump(s) that could be converted to an
active control system with properly designed ventilation fans.
VaporBlock® Plus™ 20 works to protect your flooring and
other moisture-sensitive furnishings in the building’s interior
from moisture and water vapor migration, greatly reducing
condensation, mold and degradation.
SIZE & PACKAGING
VaporBlock® Plus™ 20 is available in 10’ x 150’ rolls to
maximize coverage. All rolls are folded on heavy-duty cores
for ease in handling and installation. Other custom sizes
with factory welded seams are available based on minimum
volume requirements. Installation instructions and ASTM E-1745
classifications accompany each roll.
APPLICATIONS
Radon Barrier
Methane Barrier
VOC Barrier
Brownfields Barrier
Vapor Intrusion Barrier
Under-Slab Vapor Retarder
Foundation Wall Vapor Retarder
VaporBlock® Plus™ is a seven-layer co-extruded barrier made using high quality virgin-grade polyethylene and EVOH resins to provide unmatched impact strength as well as superior resistance to gas and moisture transmission.
VaporBlock® Plus™ Placement
All instructions on architectural or structural drawings should be reviewed and followed.
Detailed installation instructions accompany each roll of VaporBlock® Plus™ and can also be located at www.ravenefd.com.
ASTM E-1643 also provides general installation information for vapor retarders.
VAPORBLOCK® PLUS™ 20
PROPERTIES TEST METHOD IMPERIAL METRIC
AppeArAnce White/Gold
Thickness, nominAl 20 mil 0.51 mm
WeighT 102 lbs/MSF 498 g/m²
clAssificATion ASTM E 1745 CLASS A, B & C
³ Tensile sTrengTh
ASTM E 154Section 9(D-882)58 lbf 102 N
impAcT resisTAnce ASTM D 1709 2600 g
permeAnce (neW mATeriAl)
ASTM E 154Section 7ASTM E 96Procedure B
0.0098 Perms
grains/(ft²·hr·in·Hg)
0.0064 Perms
g/(24hr·m²·mm Hg)
permeAnce (AfTer condiTioning)
(sAme meAsuremenT As Above permeAnce)
ASTM E 154Section 8, E96Section 11, E96Section 12, E96Section 13, E96
0.00790.00790.00970.0113
0.00520.00520.00640.0074
WvTr ASTM E 96Procedure B 0.0040 grains/hr-ft²0.0028 gm/hr-m²
benzene permeAnce See Note ⁶1.13 x 10-¹⁰ m²/sec or 3.62 x 10-¹³ m/s
Toluene permeAnce See Note ⁶1.57 x 10-¹⁰ m²/sec or 1.46 x 10-¹³ m/s
eThylbenzene permeAnce See Note ⁶1.23 x 10-¹⁰ m²/sec or 3.34 x 10-¹⁴ m/s
m & p-Xylenes permeAnce See Note ⁶1.17 x 10-¹⁰ m²/sec or 3.81 x 10-¹⁴ m/s
o-Xylene permeAnce See Note ⁶1.10 x 10-¹⁰ m²/sec or 3.43 x 10-¹⁴ m/s
hydrogen sulfide See Note 9 1.92E-⁰⁹ m/s
TrichloroeThylene (Tce) See Note ⁶7.66 x 10-¹¹ m²/sec or 1.05 x 10-¹⁴ m/s
perchloroeThylene (pce)See Note ⁶7.22 x 10-¹¹ m²/sec or 1.04 x 10-¹⁴ m/s
rAdon diffusion coeffiecienT K124/02/95 < 1.1 x 10-13 m2/s
meThAne permeAnce ASTM D 1434 3.68E-¹² m/sGas Transmission Rate (GTR):0.32 mL/m²•day•atm
mAXimum sTATic use TemperATure 180° F 82° C
minimum sTATic use TemperATure - 70° F - 57° C
UNDER-SLAB VAPOR / GAS BARRIER
VAPORBLOCK® PLUS™VBP20
© 2018 RAVEN INDUSTRIES INC. All rights reserved.
Scan QR Code to download
current technical data sheets
via the Raven website.
Note: To the best of our knowledge, unless otherwise stated, these are typical property values and are intended as guides only, not as specification limits. Chemical resistance, odor transmission, longevity as well as other performance criteria is not implied or given and actual testing must be performed for applicability in specific applications and/or conditions. RAVEN INDUSTRIES MAKES NO WARRANTIES AS TO THE FITNESS FOR A SPECIFIC USE OR MERCHANTABILITY OF PRODUCTS REFERRED TO, no guarantee of satisfactory results from reliance upon contained information or recommendations and disclaims all liability for resulting loss or damage. Limited Warranty available at www.RavenEFD.com
061318 EFD 1125
RAVEN ENGINEERED FILMSP.O. Box 5107 Sioux Falls, SD 57117-5107Ph: [phone] • TF: [phone] [e-mail]
³ Tests are an average of machine and transverse directions.5 Raven Industries performs seam testing at 20” per minute.6 Aqueous Phase Film Permeance. Permeation of Volatile Organic Compounds through EVOH Thin Film Membranes and Coextruded LLDPE/EVOH/
LLDPE Geomembranes, McWatters and Rowe, Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering© ASCE/
September 2015. (Permeation is the Permeation Coefficient adjusted to actual film thickness - calculated at 1 kg/m³.)
The study used to determine PCE and TCE is titled: Evaluation of diffusion of PCE & TCE through high performance geomembranes by Di
Battista and Rowe, Queens University 8 Feb 2018.9 The study used to determine diffusion coefficients is titled: Hydrogen Sulfide (H₂S) Transport through Simulated Interim Covers with Conventional and Co-Extruded Ethylene-Vinyl Alcohol (EVOH) Geomembranes.
INSTALLATION GUIDELINES - With VaporSeal™ Tape
VaporSeal™
4” Tape
VaporSeal™ 4” Tape Optional Butyl Seal
2-Sided Tape
Gas Barrier Applications
Elements of a moisture/gas-resistant floor system. General illustration only.(Note: This example shows multiple options for waterstop placement.
VaporSeal™
4” Tape
VaporSeal™ 4” Tape Optional Butyl Seal
2-Sided Tape
Gas Barrier Applications
Fig. 2: VaporBlock® Plus™ Overlap Joint Sealing Methods
Fig. 1: VaporBlock® Plus™ Overlapping Roll-out Method
Please Note: Read these instructions thoroughly before installation to ensure proper use of VaporBlock® Plus™. ASTM E 1465, ASTM E 2121 and, ASTM E 1643 also provide valuable information regarding the installation of vapor / gas barriers. When installing this product, contractors shall conform to all applicable local, state and federal regulations and laws pertaining to residential and commercial building construction.
• When VaporBlock® Plus™ gas barrier is used as part of an active control system for radon or other gas, a ventilation system will be required.
• If designed as a passive system, it is recommended to install a ventilation system that could be converted to an active system if needed.
Materials List:VaporBlock® Plus™ Vapor / Gas BarrierVaporSeal™* 4” Seaming TapeVaporSeal™* 12” Seaming/Repair TapeButyl Seal 2-Sided TapeVaporBoot Plus Pipe Boots 12/Box (recommended)VaporBoot Tape (optional)POUR-N-SEAL™ (optional)1” Foam Weather Stripping (optional)Mako® Screed Supports (optional)
VAPORBLOCK® PLUS™ PLACEMENT
1.1. Level and tamp or roll granular base as specified. A base for a gas-reduction system may require a 4” to 6” gas permeable layer of clean coarse aggregate as specified by your architectural or structural drawings after installation of the recommended gas collection system. In this situation, a cushion layer consisting of a non-woven geotextile fabric placed directly under VaporBlock® Plus™ will help protect the barrier from damage due to possible sharp coarse aggregate.
1.2. Unroll VaporBlock® Plus™ running the longest dimension parallel with the direction of the pour and pull open all folds to full width. (Fig. 1)
1.3. Lap VaporBlock® Plus™ over the footings and seal with Raven Butyl Seal tape at the footing-wall connection. Prime concrete surfaces, when necessary, and assure they are dry and clean prior to applying Raven Butyl Seal Tape. Apply even and firm pressure with a rubber roller. Overlap joints a minimum of 6” and seal overlap with 4” VaporSeal™ Tape. When used as a gas barrier, overlap joints a minimum of 12” and seal in-between overlap with an optional 2-sided Raven Butyl Seal Tape. Then seal with 4” VaporSeal™ Tape centered on the overlap seam. (Fig. 2)
Page 1 of 4 Top original diagram and figure #1 were reprinted with permission by the Portland Cement Association.Reference: Kanare, Howard M., Concrete Floors and Moisture, EB119, Portland Cement Association, Skokie, Illinois, and National Ready Mixed Concrete Association, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA, 2008, 176 pages.
1.4. Seal around all plumbing, conduit, support columns or other penetrations that come through the VaporBlock® Plus™ membrane.
1.4a. Method 1: Pipes four inches or smaller can be sealed with Raven VaporBoot Plus preformed pipe boots. VaporBoot Plus preformed pipe boots are formed in steps for 1”, 2”, 3” and 4” PVC pipe or IPS size and are sold in units of 12 per box (Fig. 3 & 5).
Pipe boots may also be fabricated from excess VaporBlock® Plus™ membrane (Fig. 4 & 6) and sealed with VaporBoot Tape or VaporSeal™ Tape (sold separately).
1.4b. Method 2: To fabricate pipe boots from VaporBlock® Plus™ excess material (see Fig. 4 & 6 for A-F):
A) Cut a square large enough to overlap 12” in all directions.
B) Mark where to cut opening on the center of the square and cut four to eight slices about 3/8” less than the diameter of the pipe.
C) Force the square over the pipe leaving the tightly stretched cut area around the bottom of the pipe with approximately a 1/2” of the boot material running vertically up the pipe. (no more than a 1/2” of stretched boot material is recommended)
D) Once boot is positioned, seal the perimeter to the membrane by applying 2-sided Raven Butyl Seal Tape in between the two layers. Secure boot down firmly over the membrane taking care not to have any large folds or creases.
E) Use VaporBoot Tape or VaporSeal™ Tape to secure the boot to the
pipe.
VaporBoot Tape (option) – fold tape in half lengthwise, remove half of the release liner and wrap around the pipe allowing 1” extra for overlap sealing. Peel off the second half of the release liner and work the tape outward gradually forming a complete seal.
VaporSeal™ Tape (option) - Tape completely around pipe overlapping the VaporBlock® Plus™ square to create a tight seal against the pipe.
F) Complete the process by taping over the boot perimeter edge with VaporSeal™ Tape to create a monolithic membrane between the surface of the slab and gas/moisture sources below and at the slab perimeter. (Fig. 4 & 6)
Preformed Pipe Boot Square Material Pipe Boot
Fig. 3
SINGLE PENETRATION PIPE BOOT INSTALLATION
Fig. 5 Fig. 6
1. Cut a square of VaporBlock® Plus™ barrier to extend at least 12” from the pipe in all directions.
2. Cut four to eight slices about 3/8” less than the diameter of the pipe.
5. Use Raven VaporBoot or VaporSeal™ Tape and overlap 1” at the seam.
4. Tape over the boot perimeter edge with VaporSeal™ Tape.
1. Cut out one of the preformed boot steps (1” to 4”).
2. Tape the underside boot perimeter with 2-sided Butyl Seal Tape.
3. Force the boot over pipe and press tape firmly in place.
4. Use VaporSeal™ Tape
to secure boot to the pipe.
5. Tape around entire boot edge with VaporSeal™ Tape.
VaporBoot Flexible Tapeor VaporSeal™ 4” TapeVaporSeal™ 4” Tape
VaporBlock® Plus™Material
VaporSeal™ 4” Tape
Raven Butyl Seal2-Sided Tape Raven Butyl Seal2-Sided Tape
VaporBoot PlusPreformed Boot 12”(minimum)
3. Force over pipe and tape the underside boot perimeter to existing barrier with 2-sided Butyl Seal Tape.
Fig. 4
Page 2 of 4 Original figure #4 diagram is reprinted with permission by the Portland Cement Association.Reference: Kanare, Howard M., Concrete Floors and Moisture, EB119, Portland Cement Association, Skokie, Illinois, and National Ready Mixed Concrete Association, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA, 2008, 176 pages.Method 1
Method 2
VaporSeal™4” Tape VaporBoot PlusPerformed Boot
Raven Butyl Seal 2-sided Tape Raven Butyl Seal 2-sided Tape
1.5. Sealing side-by-side multiple penetrations (option 1);
A) Cut a patch large enough to overlap 12” in all directions (Fig. 7)
of penetrations.
B) Mark where to cut openings and cut four to eight slices about
3/8” less than the diameter of the penetration for each.
C) Force patch material over penetration to achieve a tight fit and
form a lip.
D) Once patch is positioned, seal the perimeter to the membrane
by applying 2-sided Raven Butyl Seal Tape in-between the two
layers. (Fig. 8)
E) After applying Raven Butyl Seal Tape between the patch and
membrane, tape around each of the penetrations and the patch
with VaporSeal™ 4” tape. (Fig. 9) For additional protection apply
POUR-N-SEAL™ or an acceptable polyurethane elastomeric
sealant around the penetrations. (Fig. 10)
Fig. 7 Fig. 8
Fig. 9 Fig. 10
MULTIPLE PENETRATION PIPE BOOT INSTALLATION
Fig. 6
Cut a patch large enough to overlap 12” in all directions and slide over penetrations (Make openings as tight as possible.)
Once the overlay patch is positioned, seal the perimeter to the membrane by applying 2-sided Raven Butyl Seal Tape in-between the two layers.
After applying Raven Butyl Seal Tapebetween the patch and membrane, tape around the perimeter of the penetration and the patch with VaporSeal™ 4” Tape.
For additional protection apply POUR-N-SEAL™ or an acceptable polyurethane elastomeric sealant around the penetrations.
VaporSeal™ 4” Tape VaporSeal™ 4” Tape
Page 3 of 4
Option 1
Raven Butyl Seal 2-sided Tape
1.6. POUR-N-SEAL™ method of sealing side-by-side multiple penetrations (option 2);
A) Install the vapor barrier as closely as possible to pipe penetrations to minimize the amount of POUR-N-SEAL™ necessary to seal around all penetrations.
B) Once barrier is in place, remove soil or other particles with a dry cloth or a fine broom to allow for improved adhesion to the POUR-N-SEAL™ liquid.
C) Create a dam around the penetration area approximately 2” away from the pipe or other vertical penetrations by removing the release liner from the back of a 1” weather stripping foam and adhere to the vapor barrier. Form a complete circle to contain the POUR-N-SEAL™ materials (Fig. 11).
D) Once mixed, pour contents around the pipe penetrations. If needed, a brush or a flat wooden stick can be used to direct the sealant completely around penetrations creating a complete seal (Fig. 12-13).
E) DO NOT leave excess POUR-N-SEAL™ in plastic container for longer than the time it takes to pour sealant.
Fig. 12 Fig. 13
Fig. 11
Option 2
VAPORBLOCK® PLUS™ REPAIR INSTRUCTIONS
1.7. Proper installation requires all holes and openings are repaired prior
to placing concrete. When patching small holes, simply cut a 12” long
piece of 12” wide VaporSeal™ tape. Remove release liner and center
over the opening. Apply pressure to create a seal (Fig. 14-15).
1.8. When installing VaporBlock® Plus™ around pipe penetrations,
vertical columns, electrical ducts and other obstructions, you will
find it necessary to cut it to the nearest outside edge. This cut can
be easily sealed with 12” wide VaporSeal™ tape, by simply centering
it over the cut, 6” on either side. Once the tape is placed correctly,
apply pressure to assure a complete seal (Fig. 16).
Reminder Note: All holes or penetrations through the membrane will need
to be patched with 12” VaporSeal™ Tape.
Fig. 14
Page 4 of 5
Fig. 15
2.1. When installing reinforcing steel and utilities, in addition to the
placement of concrete, take precaution to protect VaporBlock®
Plus™. Carelessness during installation can damage the most
puncture–resistant membrane. Sheets of plywood cushioned with
geotextile fabric temporarily placed on VaporBlock® Plus™ provide
for additional protection in high traffic areas including concrete
buggies.
2.2. Use only brick-type or chair-type reinforcing bar supports to protect
VaporBlock® Plus™ from puncture.
2.3. Avoid driving stakes through VaporBlock® Plus™. If this cannot be
avoided, each individual hole must be repaired per section 1.7.
2.4. To avoid penetrating VaporBlock® Plus™ when installing screed
supports, utilize non-penetrating support, such as the Mako®
Screed Support System (Fig. 17). Avoid driving stakes through
VaporBlock® Plus™. If this cannot be avoided, each individual hole
must be repaired per figures 14-15.
2.5. If a cushion or blotter layer is required in the design between
VaporBlock® Plus™ and the slab, additional care should be given if
sharp crushed rock is used. Washed rock will provide less chance of
damage during placement. Care must be taken to protect blotter layer
from precipitation before concrete is placed.
VaporBlock® Plus™ Gas & Moisture Barrier can be identified on site
as gold/white in color printed in black ink with following logo and
classification listing (Fig. 18)
Page 5 of 5
VaporBlock® Plus™
Gas & Moisture Barrier
Note: To the best of our knowledge, unless otherwise stated, these are typical property values and are intended as guides only, not as specification limits. Chemical resistance, odor transmission, longevity as well as other performance criteria is not implied or given and actual testing must be performed for applicability in specific applications and/or conditions. RAVEN INDUSTRIES MAKES NO WARRANTIES AS TO THE FITNESS FOR A SPECIFIC USE OR MERCHANTABILITY OF PRODUCTS REFERRED TO, no guarantee of satisfactory results from reliance upon contained information or recommendations and disclaims all liability for resulting loss or damage. Limited Warranty available at wwww.RavenEFD.com
ENGINEERED FILMSP.O. Box 5107 Sioux Falls, SD 57117-5107Ph: [phone] • TF: [phone]
[e-mail]
020316 EFD 1127
VAPORBLOCK® PLUS™ PROTECTION
Fig. 16
Fig. 18
Fig. 17
* Patent Pending
© Raven 2016. All Rights Reserved.
INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS
POUR-N-SEAL™
p/n: PNS1G
Note: To the best of our knowledge, unless otherwise stated, these are typical property values and are intended as guides only, not as specification limits. Chemical resistance, odor transmission, longevity as well as other performance criteria is not implied or given and actual testing must be performed for applicability in specific applications and/or conditions. RAVEN INDUSTRIES MAKES NO WARRANTIES AS TO THE FITNESS FOR A SPECIFIC USE OR MERCHANTABILITY OF PRODUCTS REFERRED TO, no guarantee of satisfactory results from reliance upon contained information or recommendations and disclaims all liability for resulting loss or damage. Limited Warranty available at wwww.RavenEFD.com
ENGINEERED FILMSP.O. Box 5107 Sioux Falls, SD 57117-5107Ph: [phone] • TF: [phone]
[e-mail]
020516 EFD 1322
1STEP
Prepare penetration areas that require sealing by cutting VaporBlock® barrier as close to the penetration(s) as possible. Effort should be given to minimize large gaps, this will also reduce the amount of POUR-N-SEAL™ necessary to complete an acceptable seal.2STEP
Seal any cut openings that were required to install VaporBlock® around the penetrations with 12” wide VaporSeal™ gas / moisture barrier tape or by overlaying a piece of VaporBlock® centered over the cut and taped around the perimeter. Clean the area to be sealed by removing any debris.
3STEP
To help concentrate the sealant around the pipe penetration, a dam can be formed 2” away from the pipe grouping with an adhesive backed 1” weather stripping foam. Complete the preparation of all areas requiring sealant to maximize the pot life of POUR-N-SEAL™ epoxy, prior to mixing the two components.
4STEP
Avoid Contact with skin by wearing protective gloves and clothing. Only mix the amount of material that can be used within the pot life of the epoxy, approximately 36 minutes at 73° F. Premix each component prior to combining. Pour “A” and “B” components together and thoroughly mix using a low speed drill with a mixing paddle. Scrape the sides and bottom to assure a consistent blend. If not thoroughly mixed, the set time will be greatly extended.
5STEP
Once mixed, pour contents around the pipe penetrations, if needed a brush or flat wooden stick can be used to direct the sealant completely around all penetrations and overlap the moisture/gas barrier to form a continuous seal. Immediately dispose of any remaining mixed POUR-N-SEAL™ epoxy left in the container to avoid excessive heat buildup. Depending upon the temperature, POUR-N-SEAL™ should be tack free in approximately 5 hours.
6STEP
Penetrations should be sealed, once filled, covering the entire surface inside the foam dam. Allow to cure prior to pouring concrete to assure a continuous seal without displacing the POUR-N-SEAL™ epoxy. Leave foam dam in place. See SDS for complete safety precautions. For professional use only.
NOTE: Store in dry environment between 40º F and 80º F (4º C-27º C). Do not allow product to freeze.
Prior to use, keep overnight to precondition at a temperature between 70° F to 80° F. Protect from moisture.
ENGINEERED FILMSP.O. Box 5107 Sioux Falls, SD 57117-5107Ph: [phone] • TF: [phone]
[e-mail]
012116 EFD 1319
HIGH-STRENGTH EPOXY BONDING ADHESIVE
POUR-N-SEAL™
PRODUCT NAMEPOUR-N-SEAL™ (P/N: PNS1G)
MANUFACTURERRaven Industries, Inc.
821 W. Algonquin Street
Sioux Falls, SD 57104
PRODUCT DESCRIPTION
POUR-N-SEAL™ is a gray two-part medium viscosity high strength epoxy used to seal around multiple pipe penetrations in tight areas where pipe boots are not practical,
when installing VaporBlock® moisture and
gas barriers.
TECHNICAL DATA
Applicable Standards: • ASTM (American Society for Testing and Materials) • ASTM C881 Standard Specification for
Epoxy-Resin-Base Bonding Systems for
Concrete • ASTM D695 Standard Test Method for Compressive Properties of Rigid Plastics • ASTM D638 Standard Test Method for
Tensile Properties of Plastics
• ASTM C882 Standard Test method for Bond Strength of Epoxy-Resin Systems Used with Concrete by Slant Shear • ASTM Standard Test Method for
Deflection Temperature of Plastics Under
Flexural Load in the Edgewise Position • ASTM D570 Standard Test Method for Water Absorption of Plastics
MATERIAL PREPARATIONStore material overnight to precondition at a temperature between 70° F to 80° F prior to use.
INSTALLATION
1. POUR-N-SEAL™ is used to seal
moisture and gas barriers to multiple pipe penetrations in situations where pipe boots are not able to be installed due to the tight concentration of the pipe penetrations.
2. Install the vapor/gas barrier as close as
possible to the penetrations by making a small opening. Effort should be given to minimize large gaps in the barrier next to the penetrations, this will also reduce the
amount of POUR-N-SEAL™ necessary to
complete an acceptable seal.3. To help concentrate the sealant around the pipe penetration, a dam can be formed around the pipe grouping with an adhesive
backed weather stripping foam. One gallon
covers 80 sq. ft. at a thickness of 20 mils.
4. Only mix the amount of material that can be used within the pot life of the epoxy,
approximately 36 minutes at 73° F. Premix
each component prior to combining. Pour “A” and “B” components together and thoroughly mix using a low speed drill with a mixing paddle. Scrape the sides and bottom
to assure a consistent blend.
5. Once mixed, pour contents around the pipe penetrations, if needed a brush or flat wooden stick can be used to direct the sealant completely around all penetrations
and overlap the moisture/gas barrier to form
a continuous seal. Avoid Contact with skin (see SDS for complete safety precautions). Immediately dispose of any remaining mixed POUR-N-SEAL™ epoxy left in th container to
avoid excessive heat buildup.
6. Depending upon the temperature. POUR-N-SEAL should be tack free in approximately 5 hours.
STORAGE/SHELF LIFEStore in dry environment between 40º F and 80º F (4º C-27º C). Do not allow product
to freeze. Shelf Life: 12 months from date
of manufacture in unopened containers properly stored. Protect from moisture.
AVAILABILITYPlease call your local construction supply distributor for availability of POUR-N-SEAL™
or call our toll free number at 800-635-3456.
SAFETY
POUR-N-SEAL™ “B” component contains amines and may cause severe burns upon skin contact for any length of time. Use OSHA-approved personal protective
equipment (PPE), including safety glasses,
gloves and confined space equipment/
TEST DATA
Compressive Strength ASTM D-695 11,070
Compressive Modulus of Elasticity ASTM D-695 370,000
Tensile Strength ASTM D-638 3,480
Tensile Modulus of Elasticity ASTM D-638 429,000
Tensile Elongation ASTM D-638 1.2 %
Bond Strength (dry cure) - 2 day ASTM C-882 3,390
Bond Strength (dry cure) - 14 day ASTM C-882 3,600
Shore Hardness D scale 86 D
Heat Deflection ASTM D-648 120° F (49° C)
Water Absorption ASTM D-570 < 1 %
procedures if applicable. Avoid skin contact;
do not ingest. See SDS for complete safety precautions. For professional use only.
WARRANTYRaven Industries, Inc. warrants its products to be free from manufacturing defects and that
products meet the published characteristics
when tested in accordance with ASTM standards. No other warranties by Raven Industries, Inc. are expressed or implied, including no warranty of merchantability
or fitness for a particular purpose. Raven
Industries, Inc. will not be liable for damages of any sort resulting from any claimed breach of warranty. Raven Industries’ liability under this warranty is limited to replacement of material
or refund of sales price of the material. There
are no warranties on any product that has exceeded the “shelf life” or “expiration date” printed on the package label.
TURBINE VENTILATORS
CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATIONS
“A”
THROAT SIZE
GUAGE NO. OF
BRACES
BRACE
MATERIALCROWN GALV.BLADE GALV.THROAT GALV.
4 24 28 26 3 ALUMINUM
6 24 28 26 3 ALUMINUM
8 24 28 26 3 ALUMINUM
10 24 28 26 3 ALUMINUM
12 24 28 24 3 ALUMINUM
14 22 26 24 3 ALUMINUM
16 22 26 24 3 STEEL
18 22 26 24 4 STEEL
20 20 26 24 4 STEEL
24 20 26 22 4 STEEL
DIMENSIONAL AND PERFORMACE DATA
“A”
THROAT SIZE
“B”
HEIGHT
“C”
OVERALL WIDTH
EXHAUSTED
CAPACITY*
APPROX.
SHIPPING WEIGHT
4 12 10 1/4 125 5
6 14 1/2 12 3/4 147 7
8 15 14 1/4 255 8
10 16 1/4 16 1/4 425 11
12 17 19 631 13
14 19 3/4 22 3/4 700 21
16 21 3/4 25 1/2 950 31
18 24 29 1200 38
20 25 1/4 31 5/8 1700 46
24 28 1/4 35 3/4 2350 58
*4 MPHWIND CFM
Internet #203945902 Model #PVC 00110 1000 Store SKU #1006145800Customers Also ViewedCharlotte Pipe
4 in. PVC DWV Flush Cleanout Plug
(1)Questions & Answers
Hover Image to Zoom
Home Plumbing Pipe & Fittings Fittings PVC Fittings////Charlotte Pipe 4 in. PVCDWV FTG Cleanout Adapterwith Plug (9)$1852 NDS PVC S&D Cleanout Plug,4 in. MPT (18)$474 Charlotte Pipe 2 in. DWVPVC Flush Cleanout Plug(2)$316 Charlotte PipePVC Flush Clea$405#1 Home Improvement RetailerYou're shoppingOPEN until 10 pm Delivering to28027Santa Fe, NM Search Cart | 0 itemsProduct Details Specifications Questions & Answers Customer Reviews4 in. PVC DWV Flush Cleanout Plugby Charlotte Pipe (1)$505.
Product Details
Specifications
$5.05 Delivering to: 28027 | ChangeWe'll send up to 53 to Santa Fe, NM for free pickupChange Store-+Ship to StorePickupMar 30 - Apr 4FREE Ship to HomeGet it bySun, Mar 26FREE Scheduled DeliveryNot available for thisitem1Add to Cart
PVC fittings are for drain, waste and vent purposes. They are
used in gravity-fed waste elimination systems and are for Non-
Pressure systems where temperatures will not exceed 140°F.
PVC is lightweight and easy to install. They require no special
tools for cutting, and can be installed with solvent cementing,
threading, flanging and roll-grooved joining.
Additional Resources
From the Manufacturer
Dimensions
Fitting 1 size 4"
Fitting Size Dimensions 4"
Product Depth (in.)4.5 in
Single Fitting Size 4"
Details
Application Non-Potable Water
Color Family White
Color/Finish White
Compatible Pipe Material PVC
Connection 1 MPT
Connectivity Solvent Cemented
DWV DWV
4 in. PVC DWV Flush Cleanout Plugby Charlotte Pipe $505.
Questions & AnswersCustomer Reviews5 out of 5 (1)
Frequently Bought Together
+
This Item
Charlotte Pipe4 in. PVC DWV FlushCleanout Plug
(1)
$505
+
Charlotte Pipe4 in. PVC DWV FemaleAdapter
(103)
$1161
Oatey32 oz. Heavy-Duty ClearPVC Cement
(538)
$1865
Select Select Select
Features Underground RatedFitting or Connector Type PlugFitting/ Connector Collection PVCMaterialPVCMaximum working pressure (psi)0Maximum Working Temperature (F)140Pack Size 1Pipe or Fitting Product Type Fittings & ConnectorsProduct Weight (lb.).410 lbReducing Fitting NoReturnable90-DaySchedule Type Schedule 40Warranty / CertificationsManufacturer Warranty Charlotte Pipe and Foundry Company (Charlotte Pipe)Products are warranted to be free from manufacturingdefects and to conform to currently applicable ASTMstandards for a period of five (5) years from date ofdelivery.How can we improve our product information? Provide feedback.4 in. PVC DWV Flush Cleanout Plugby Charlotte Pipe $505.
Original Gripper ®
Gripper plugs can be used in a variety of
applications including DWV (drain, waste
and vent) testing and stack testing.
End-of-Pipe design won’t fall in, whereas
the Inside-of-Pipe design allows you to
locate the plug inside the pipe as far as
you need. Time tested, the Gripper® Plug
remains one of the most popular
mechanical plugs on the market.
Original Gripper® Plug Features:
• Ideal for sewer testing and long-term applications
• Made with glass-reinforced ABS plastic
• End-of-pipe design seals only at the end of a pipe
• Inside-of-pipe design seals inside pipe as far as needed
Equipped with:
• Easy-to-install extra large zinc wing nut – won’t rust
• Natural rubber o-ring
• Galvanized carriage bolt to prevent corrosion
End-of-Pipe Gripper® plug Inside-of-Pipe Gripper® plug
End-of-Pipe Gripper
Nominal Size Usage Range Maximum Back Pressure Length Product Weight
1-1/2" (40 mm)1.48"–1.65" (39–42 mm)17 psi (1,2 bar)40 ft. (12 M)1.75" (44.5 mm)0.13 lbs (0.05 kg)
2" (50 mm)1.9"–2.17" (49–55 mm)17 psi (1,2 bar)40 ft. (12 M)1.87" (47.5 mm)0.19 lbs (0.09 kg)
3" (75 mm)2.8"–3.1" (71–79 mm)17 psi (1,2 bar)40 ft. (12 M)2.5" (63.5 mm)0.375 lbs (0.16 kg)
4" (100 mm)3.8"–4.06" (96–103 mm)17 psi (1,2 bar)40 ft. (12 M)2.5" (63.5 mm)0.5 lbs (0.23 kg)
6" (150 mm)5.77"–6.08" (147–154 mm)17 psi (1,2 bar)40 ft. (12 M)3.75" (95.3 mm)2.5 lbs (1.14 kg)TECHNICAL DATATOOLS & ACCESSORIESTESTING EQUIPMENTDEFLECTION GAUGESPNEUMATIC PLUGSMECHANICAL PLUGS
Appendix D
VIMS Installation Photographs
Photograph 2: Close-up view of one of the three monitoring points and adequate gravel
layer located in the space.LEH-0042923 S. Tryon Street, Suite 100
Charlotte, NC 28203704.586.0007(p) 704.586.0373(f)
Photograph 1: General view of the stone base and sub-slab piping network in the 1513 S. Mint
Street tenant space.
QUALITY PRODUCTS CO.1513 SOUTH MINT STREETCHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA
LEH-0042923 S. Tryon Street, Suite 100
Charlotte, NC 28203704.586.0007(p) 704.586.0373(f)
Photograph 3: Representative over view of Raven Industries VaporBlock® Plus 20 vapor
barrier installed in the space.
QUALITY PRODUCTS CO.1513 SOUTH MINT STREETCHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA
Photograph 4: Close-up view of representative seal accomplished around penetrations to
the vapor barrier using the Raven Industries pipe boot application.
Photograph 6: Representative view of turbine ventilator installed on roof.LEH-0042923 S. Tryon Street, Suite 100
Charlotte, NC 28203704.586.0007(p) 704.586.0373(f)
QUALITY PRODUCTS CO.1513 SOUTH MINT STREETCHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA
Photograph 5: Representative view of risers installed with adequate labels and pitched to ensure
proper drainage.
“Vapor
Mitigation
System –
Contact
Maintenance”

Appendix E
Field Forms and Field Data
Appendix E Table 1
VIMS Pilot Test Vacuum Monitoring
Quality Products Co.
1513 South Mint Street
Charlotte, North Carolina
Brownfields Project No. 22016-18-060
H&H Job No. LEH-004
Baseline Initial Reading 10 minute
reading
F-4 0.000 -2.625 -2.690
F-5 0.000 -2.730 -2.720
F-6 0.000 -2.630 -2.680
MP-4 0.000 -0.895 -0.893
MP-5 0.000 -1.056 -1.053
MP-6 0.000 -1.069 -1.070
Notes
1)AMG Eagle Extreme fans were used on all risers during testing.
Point ID
Vacuum Measurements
(in-WC)Date Point Type
March 3, 2023
Fan
Monitoring
Point
https://harthick.sharepoint.com/sites/MasterFiles-1/Shared Documents/AAA-Master Projects/Lischerong Enterprises and Holdings (LEH)/S. Mint St/VIMS Install Reports/1513 S Mint Upfit/Tables/1513 Pilot Test Data3/23/2023
Appendix E Table 1 (Page 1 of 1)
Hart & Hickman, PC
&Žƌŵ^sͲϭ6XE6ODE6RLO*DV9DSRU,QVWDOODWLRQ)LHOG)RUP3URMHFW1RBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB6DPSOHUBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB:HDWKHUBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB6XUIDFH0DWHULDO6ODE7KLFNQHVVLIDSSO0DWHULDO%HORZ6ODELIDSSO'HSWKRI6FUHHQLIDSSO7\SH 'DWH 7LPH$PELHQW7HPS3XUJH0HWKRG9ROXPH3XUJHG6KURXG+HOLXP&RQF3XUJH+HOLXP&RQF/HDN7HVW3DVV"VHHQRWH666*3HUP7HPS&RQFUHWHVRLOJUDYHODVSKDOW,QFKHV*UDYHOVDQGFOD\HWFIWEJV)XOOVDPSOHWUDLQRUSRLQWRQO\PPGG\\KUR)6\ULQJHSXPS/LWHUVVHHQRWHVIRUFDOFRUSSPLQGLFDWHXQLWVEHORZ<HV1R^͗͗Z͗^͗͗Z͗^͗͗Z͗^͗͗Z͗^͗͗Z͗^͗͗Z͗6 VDPSOH,'& FDQLVWHU,'5 UHJXODWRU,'66 VXEVODE6* VRLOJDV3HUP SHUPDQHQW7HPS WHPSRUDU\9ROXPH3XUJHG [SXUJHYROXPHV 
/
D/DVWXSGDWHG+J LQFKHVRIPHUFXU\SSP SDUWVSHUPLOOLRQ1RWHVBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB6DPSOH,'7\SH9DSRU0RQLWRULQJ3RLQW&RQVWUXFWLRQ +HOLXP/HDN7HVWEŽƚĞ͗>ĞĂŬdĞƐƚZĞƋƵŝƌĞŵĞŶƚƐWĞƌEYtDsĂƉŽƌ/ŶƚƌƵƐŝŽŶ'ƵŝĚĂŶĐĞ͕ůĞĂŬƚĞƐƚƉĂƐƐĞƐŝĨŚĞůŝƵŵĐŽŶĐĞŶƚƌĂƚŝŽŶŝŶƉƵƌŐĞĂŝƌŝƐůĞƐƐƚŚĂŶϭϬйŽĨŚĞůŝƵŵĐŽŶĐĞŶƚƌĂƚŝŽŶŝŶƐŚƌŽƵĚ͘/ OHQJWKRIWXELQJSLSHIWD IRUGLDPHWHU/IWD IRUGLDPHWHU/IW͗ͰhƐĞƌƐͰŵǀĂǁƚĞƌͰƌŽƉďŽdžͰLJKƚŚĞƌͰ&ŽƌŵĚŝƚƐͰ/YͲ^^sͰsĂƉŽƌ^ĂŵƉůŝŶŐ&ŽƌŵƐͺsϲ͘Ϭ^ƵďͲ^ůĂďͬ^Žŝů'ĂƐ^ĂŵƉůŝŶŐsĂƉŽƌ/ŶƐƚĂůůĂƚŝŽŶ&ŝĞůĚ&Žƌŵ,ĂƌƚΘ,ŝĐŬŵĂŶ͕WLEH-004JL50s F & sunnyMP-4/MP-DUP5962/5997SS Perm. Conc. 4 Gravel NAFull3/17/23 09:4555Pump13.0 15.8 0 ppm Yes16233MP-65907SS Perm. Conc. 4 Gravel NAFull03/17/23 10:5056Pump13.0 16.1 0 ppm Yes6556
&Žƌŵ^sͲϮ6XE6ODE6RLO*DV9DSRU6DPSOLQJ)LHOG)RUP3URMHFW1RBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB 6DPSOHUBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB :HDWKHUBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB'DWH3URSRVHG6DPSOLQJ'XUDWLRQ7LPH&DQLVWHU3UHVVXUH2XWGRRU7HPSHUDWXUH2XWGRRU+XPLGLW\,QGRRU7HPSHUDWXUH,QGRRU+XPLGLW\PPGG\\ 0LQXWHV KU +JR)R)^͗%HJLQQLQJ͗0LGGOHZ͗(QG^͗%HJLQQLQJ͗0LGGOHZ͗(QG^͗%HJLQQLQJ͗0LGGOHZ͗(QG^͗%HJLQQLQJ͗0LGGOHZ͗(QG^͗%HJLQQLQJ͗0LGGOHZ͗(QG^͗%HJLQQLQJ͗0LGGOHZ͗(QG6 VDPSOH,'& FDQLVWHU,'5 UHJXODWRU,'66 VXEVODE6* VRLOJDV3HUP SHUPDQHQW7HPS WHPSRUDU\/DVWXSGDWHG+J LQFKHVRIPHUFXU\1RWHVBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB^ŝnjĞ͗&ůŽǁZĂƚĞ͗^ŝnjĞ͗&ůŽǁZĂƚĞ͗6DPSOH,'^ŝnjĞ͗&ůŽǁZĂƚĞ͗^ŝnjĞ͗&ůŽǁZĂƚĞ͗^ŝnjĞ͗&ůŽǁZĂƚĞ͗^ŝnjĞ͗&ůŽǁZĂƚĞ͗6DPSOLQJ,QIRUPDWLRQ ,QGRRU3DUDPHWHUV2XWGRRU3DUDPHWHUV6DPSOLQJ3HULRGEŽƚĞ͗WĞƌEYtDsĂƉŽƌ/ŶƚƌƵƐŝŽŶ'ƵŝĚĂŶĐĞ͕ƐŚƵƚͲŝŶƚĞƐƚĂŶĚŚĞůŝƵŵůĞĂŬĐŚĞĐŬŵƵƐƚďĞƉĂƐƐĞĚďĞĨŽƌĞƐĂŵƉůŝŶŐ͗͘ͰhƐĞƌƐͰŵǀĂǁƚĞƌͰƌŽƉďŽdžͰLJKƚŚĞƌͰ&ŽƌŵĚŝƚƐͰ/YͲ^^sͰsĂƉŽƌ^ĂŵƉůŝŶŐ&ŽƌŵƐͺsϲ͘Ϭ^ƵďͲ^ůĂďͬ^Žŝů'ĂƐ^ĂŵƉůŝŶŐsĂƉŽƌ^ĂŵƉůŝŶŐ&ŝĞůĚ&Žƌŵ,ĂƌƚΘ,ŝĐŬŵĂŶ͕WLEH-004JL50s F & sunnyMP-4/MP-DUP1 L5962/59973/17/2310100 mL/min10:00 -1755 66 NM1623310:05 -509:55 -27NMMP-61 L11:03 -2859073/17/231011:08 -1756 71 NM NM100 mL/min655611:13 -5NM = not measured; building left fairly open attime of sampling

Appendix F
Laboratory Analytical Report

Laboratory's liability in any claim relating to analyses performed shall be limited to, at laboratory's option, repeating the
analysis in question at laboratory's expense, or the refund of the charges paid for performance of said analysis.

3/22/2023
Hart & Hickman (Charlotte) Juliana Lima
2923 South Tryon St. Ste 100 Charlotte, NC, 28203
Ref: Analytical Testing
Lab Report Number: 23-076-0013 Client Project Description: LEH-004
Dear Juliana Lima:
Waypoint Analytical, LLC (Charlotte) received sample(s) on 3/17/2023 for the analyses presented in the
following report.
The above referenced project has been analyzed per your instructions. The analyses were performed in accordance with the applicable analytical method.
The analytical data has been validated using standard quality control measures performed as required by the
analytical method. Quality Assurance, method validations, instrumentation maintenance and calibration for all parameters were performed in accordance with guidelines established by the USEPA (including 40 CFR 136
Method Update Rule May 2021) unless otherwise indicated. Certain parameters (chlorine, pH, dissolved oxygen, sulfite...) are required to be analyzed within 15 minutes of sampling. Usually, but not always, any field parameter analyzed at the laboratory is outside of this holding time.
Refer to sample analysis time for confirmation of holding time compliance.
The results are shown on the attached Report of Analysis(s). Results for solid matrices are reported on an as-received basis unless otherwise indicated. This report shall not be reproduced except in full and relates only to
the samples included in this report. Please do not hesitate to contact me or client services if you have any questions or need additional information. Sincerely,
Angela D Overcash Senior Project Manager
Page 1 of 23
Certification Summary
Laboratory ID: WP CNC: Waypoint Analytical Carolina, Inc. (C), Charlotte, NC
State Program Lab ID Expiration Date
07/31/202337735State ProgramNorth Carolina
12/31/2023402State ProgramNorth Carolina
07/31/202399012State ProgramSouth Carolina
12/31/202299012State ProgramSouth Carolina
Page 1 of 1 00016/23-076-0013
Page 2 of 23
Report Number:
Sample Summary Table
Client Project Description:
23-076-0013
LEH-004
Lab No Client Sample ID Matrix Date Collected Date Received
03/17/2023Air 91440 MP-DUP 03/17/2023 11:43
03/17/2023 09:55Air 91441 MP-4 03/17/2023 11:43
03/17/2023 11:03Air 91442 MP-6 03/17/2023 11:43
Page 3 of 23
Summary of Detected Analytes
QualifiersAnalyzedUnitsResult
Report Number:
Client Sample ID
Method Parameters
Lab Sample ID
23-076-0013
Report Limit
Project:LEH-004
V 91440MP-DUP
272 03/17/2023 14:48TO-15 Acetone µg/m3 4.04
J0.683 03/21/2023 16:08TO-15 Benzene µg/m3 0.073
J0.707 03/21/2023 16:08TO-15 Chloroform µg/m3 0.086
4.68 03/21/2023 16:08TO-15 1,4-Dichlorobenzene µg/m3 0.186
3.00 03/21/2023 16:08TO-15 Dichlorodifluoromethane µg/m3 0.134
2.19 03/21/2023 16:08TO-15 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene µg/m3 0.095
4.29 03/21/2023 16:08TO-15 4-Ethyltoluene µg/m3 0.128
JB3.26 03/21/2023 16:08TO-15 Isopropyl Alcohol µg/m3 0.139
584 03/17/2023 14:48TO-15 Methyl Ethyl Ketone (MEK)µg/m3 4.48
3.82 03/21/2023 16:08TO-15 Methylene Chloride µg/m3 0.488
6.55 03/21/2023 16:08TO-15 Naphthalene µg/m3 0.183
9.32 03/21/2023 16:08TO-15 Propene µg/m3 0.242
J0.494 03/21/2023 16:08TO-15 Styrene µg/m3 0.124
670 03/17/2023 14:48TO-15 Tetrahydrofuran µg/m3 2.14
1.97 03/21/2023 16:08TO-15 Toluene µg/m3 0.090
11.8 03/21/2023 16:08TO-15 Trichloroethene µg/m3 0.199
J1.90 03/21/2023 16:08TO-15 Trichlorofluoromethane µg/m3 0.130
4.47 03/21/2023 16:08TO-15 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene µg/m3 0.110
3.47 03/21/2023 16:08TO-15 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene µg/m3 0.236
2.92 03/21/2023 16:08TO-15 o-Xylene µg/m3 0.157
J0.655 03/21/2023 16:08TO-15 m,p-Xylene µg/m3 0.217
J3.58 03/21/2023 16:08TO-15 Xylene (Total)µg/m3 0.157
V 91441MP-4
280 03/17/2023 15:25TO-15 Acetone µg/m3 4.04
J0.824 03/21/2023 17:00TO-15 Benzene µg/m3 0.073
J0.722 03/21/2023 17:00TO-15 Chloroform µg/m3 0.086
4.70 03/21/2023 17:00TO-15 1,4-Dichlorobenzene µg/m3 0.186
3.11 03/21/2023 17:00TO-15 Dichlorodifluoromethane µg/m3 0.134
2.14 03/21/2023 17:00TO-15 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene µg/m3 0.095
4.22 03/21/2023 17:00TO-15 4-Ethyltoluene µg/m3 0.128
3.34 03/21/2023 17:00TO-15 Heptane µg/m3 0.143
2.01 03/21/2023 17:00TO-15 n-Hexane µg/m3 0.047
B5.37 03/21/2023 17:00TO-15 Isopropyl Alcohol µg/m3 0.139
603 03/17/2023 15:25TO-15 Methyl Ethyl Ketone (MEK)µg/m3 4.48
5.01 03/21/2023 17:00TO-15 Methylene Chloride µg/m3 0.488
6.43 03/21/2023 17:00TO-15 Naphthalene µg/m3 0.183
Page 4 of 23
Summary of Detected Analytes
QualifiersAnalyzedUnitsResult
Report Number:
Client Sample ID
Method Parameters
Lab Sample ID
23-076-0013
Report Limit
Project:LEH-004
V 91441MP-4
9.56 03/21/2023 17:00TO-15 Propene µg/m3 0.242
J0.451 03/21/2023 17:00TO-15 Styrene µg/m3 0.124
692 03/17/2023 15:25TO-15 Tetrahydrofuran µg/m3 2.14
2.07 03/21/2023 17:00TO-15 Toluene µg/m3 0.090
12.3 03/21/2023 17:00TO-15 Trichloroethene µg/m3 0.199
J1.93 03/21/2023 17:00TO-15 Trichlorofluoromethane µg/m3 0.130
4.21 03/21/2023 17:00TO-15 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene µg/m3 0.110
3.42 03/21/2023 17:00TO-15 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene µg/m3 0.236
2.81 03/21/2023 17:00TO-15 o-Xylene µg/m3 0.157
J0.499 03/21/2023 17:00TO-15 m,p-Xylene µg/m3 0.217
J3.31 03/21/2023 17:00TO-15 Xylene (Total)µg/m3 0.157
V 91442MP-6
418 03/17/2023 16:02TO-15 Acetone µg/m3 4.04
1.77 03/21/2023 17:53TO-15 Benzene µg/m3 0.073
J0.255 03/21/2023 17:53TO-15 Carbon Disulfide µg/m3 0.060
J0.326 03/21/2023 17:53TO-15 Chlorobenzene µg/m3 0.107
J1.60 03/21/2023 17:53TO-15 Chloroform µg/m3 0.086
J1.68 03/21/2023 17:53TO-15 Cyclohexane µg/m3 0.161
2.96 03/21/2023 17:53TO-15 Dichlorodifluoromethane µg/m3 0.134
2.95 03/21/2023 17:53TO-15 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene µg/m3 0.095
J0.490 03/21/2023 17:53TO-15 Ethylbenzene µg/m3 0.106
4.25 03/21/2023 17:53TO-15 4-Ethyltoluene µg/m3 0.128
3.34 03/21/2023 17:53TO-15 Heptane µg/m3 0.143
JB3.78 03/21/2023 17:53TO-15 Isopropyl Alcohol µg/m3 0.139
2510 03/17/2023 16:02TO-15 Methyl Ethyl Ketone (MEK)µg/m3 4.48
3.38 03/21/2023 17:53TO-15 Methylene Chloride µg/m3 0.488
6.46 03/21/2023 17:53TO-15 Naphthalene µg/m3 0.183
8.35 03/21/2023 17:53TO-15 Propene µg/m3 0.242
2.23 03/21/2023 17:53TO-15 Styrene µg/m3 0.124
J0.474 03/21/2023 17:53TO-15 Tetrachloroethene µg/m3 0.181
2580 03/17/2023 16:02TO-15 Tetrahydrofuran µg/m3 2.14
10.3 03/21/2023 17:53TO-15 Toluene µg/m3 0.090
223 03/21/2023 17:53TO-15 Trichloroethene µg/m3 0.199
J1.88 03/21/2023 17:53TO-15 Trichlorofluoromethane µg/m3 0.130
4.32 03/21/2023 17:53TO-15 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene µg/m3 0.110
3.46 03/21/2023 17:53TO-15 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene µg/m3 0.236
Page 5 of 23
Summary of Detected Analytes
QualifiersAnalyzedUnitsResult
Report Number:
Client Sample ID
Method Parameters
Lab Sample ID
23-076-0013
Report Limit
Project:LEH-004
V 91442MP-6
3.06 03/21/2023 17:53TO-15 o-Xylene µg/m3 0.157
J1.04 03/21/2023 17:53TO-15 m,p-Xylene µg/m3 0.217
J4.10 03/21/2023 17:53TO-15 Xylene (Total)µg/m3 0.157
Page 6 of 23
,
REPORT OF ANALYSISReport Number :
Project
Information :
NC 28203
23-076-0013
01102
Hart & Hickman (Charlotte)
2923 South Tryon St. Ste 100
Juliana Lima
Charlotte
Received : 03/17/2023
LEH-004
Report Date : 03/22/2023
Sample ID :
Lab No :
Sampled:MP-DUP
91440 Matrix:
3/17/2023 0:00
Air
Analytical Method:
Prep Method:
Test Results Units MDL MQL By Analytical
Batch
Date / Time
Analyzed
DF
TO-15 Prep
TO-15 Prep Batch(es):V31062 03/21/23 09:00 V31081 03/17/23 09:00
272 µg/m3 4.04 95.0Acetone 20 03/17/23 14:48 V31084ENM
0.683 J µg/m3 0.073 1.60Benzene 1 03/21/23 16:08 V31069ENM
<0.147 µg/m3 0.147 10.4Benzyl Chloride 1 03/21/23 16:08 V31069ENM
<0.150 µg/m3 0.150 3.35Bromodichloromethane 1 03/21/23 16:08 V31069ENM
<0.153 µg/m3 0.153 5.17Bromoform 1 03/21/23 16:08 V31069ENM
<0.115 µg/m3 0.115 1.94Bromomethane 1 03/21/23 16:08 V31069ENM
<0.328 µg/m3 0.328 1.111,3-Butadiene 1 03/21/23 16:08 V31069ENM
<0.060 µg/m3 0.060 6.23Carbon Disulfide 1 03/21/23 16:08 V31069ENM
<0.155 µg/m3 0.155 3.15
Carbon Tetrachloride 1 03/21/23 16:08 V31069ENM
<0.107 µg/m3 0.107 2.30Chlorobenzene 1 03/21/23 16:08 V31069ENM
<0.208 µg/m3 0.208 4.26Chlorodibromomethane 1 03/21/23 16:08 V31069ENM
<0.164 µg/m3 0.164 1.32Chloroethane 1 03/21/23 16:08 V31069ENM
0.707 J µg/m3 0.086 2.44Chloroform 1 03/21/23 16:08 V31069ENM
<0.067 µg/m3 0.067 1.03Chloromethane 1 03/21/23 16:08 V31069ENM
<0.161 µg/m3 0.161 3.44Cyclohexane 1 03/21/23 16:08 V31069ENM
<0.151 µg/m3 0.151 3.84
1,2-Dibromoethane 1 03/21/23 16:08 V31069ENM
<0.096 µg/m3 0.096 3.011,2-Dichlorobenzene 1 03/21/23 16:08 V31069ENM
<0.174 µg/m3 0.174 12.01,3-Dichlorobenzene 1 03/21/23 16:08 V31069ENM
4.68 µg/m3 0.186 3.011,4-Dichlorobenzene 1 03/21/23 16:08 V31069ENM
3.00 µg/m3 0.134 2.47Dichlorodifluoromethane 1 03/21/23 16:08 V31069ENM
<0.101 µg/m3 0.101 2.021,1-Dichloroethane 1 03/21/23 16:08 V31069ENM
<0.129 µg/m3 0.129 2.021,2-Dichloroethane 1 03/21/23 16:08 V31069ENM
Qualifiers/
Definitions
Dilution FactorDFAnalyte detected in blankB
Method Quantitation LimitMQLEstimated valueJ
Page 7 of 23
,
REPORT OF ANALYSISReport Number :
Project
Information :
NC 28203
23-076-0013
01102
Hart & Hickman (Charlotte)
2923 South Tryon St. Ste 100
Juliana Lima
Charlotte
Received : 03/17/2023
LEH-004
Report Date : 03/22/2023
Sample ID :
Lab No :
Sampled:MP-DUP
91440 Matrix:
3/17/2023 0:00
Air
Analytical Method:
Prep Method:
Test Results Units MDL MQL By Analytical
Batch
Date / Time
Analyzed
DF
TO-15 Prep
TO-15 Prep Batch(es):V31062 03/21/23 09:00 V31081 03/17/23 09:00
<0.107 µg/m3 0.107 1.981,1-Dichloroethene 1 03/21/23 16:08 V31069ENM
2.19 µg/m3 0.095 1.98cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 1 03/21/23 16:08 V31069ENM
<0.108 µg/m3 0.108 1.98trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 1 03/21/23 16:08 V31069ENM
<0.205 µg/m3 0.205 2.311,2-Dichloropropane 1 03/21/23 16:08 V31069ENM
<0.622 µg/m3 0.622 3.501,2-Dichlorotetrafluoroethane 1 03/21/23 16:08 V31069ENM
<0.178 µg/m3 0.178 2.27cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 1 03/21/23 16:08 V31069ENM
<0.178 µg/m3 0.178 2.27trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 1 03/21/23 16:08 V31069ENM
<0.435 µg/m3 0.435 1.801,4-Dioxane 1 03/21/23 16:08 V31069ENM
<0.136 µg/m3 0.136 1.80
Ethyl Acetate 1 03/21/23 16:08 V31069ENM
<0.106 µg/m3 0.106 2.17Ethylbenzene 1 03/21/23 16:08 V31069ENM
4.29 µg/m3 0.128 2.464-Ethyltoluene 1 03/21/23 16:08 V31069ENM
<0.561 µg/m3 0.561 3.831,1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-trifluoroethane 1 03/21/23 16:08 V31069ENM
<0.143 µg/m3 0.143 2.05Heptane 1 03/21/23 16:08 V31069ENM
<0.330 µg/m3 0.330 5.33Hexachlorobutadiene 1 03/21/23 16:08 V31069ENM
<0.047 µg/m3 0.047 1.76n-Hexane 1 03/21/23 16:08 V31069ENM
<0.285 µg/m3 0.285 2.05
2-Hexanone 1 03/21/23 16:08 V31069ENM
3.26 JB µg/m3 0.139 4.92Isopropyl Alcohol 1 03/21/23 16:08 V31069ENM
584 µg/m3 4.48 29.5Methyl Ethyl Ketone (MEK)20 03/17/23 14:48 V31084ENM
<0.033 µg/m3 0.033 1.80Methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE)1 03/21/23 16:08 V31069ENM
<0.121 µg/m3 0.121 2.054-Methyl-2-Pentanone 1 03/21/23 16:08 V31069ENM
3.82 µg/m3 0.488 1.74Methylene Chloride 1 03/21/23 16:08 V31069ENM
6.55 µg/m3 0.183 2.62Naphthalene 1 03/21/23 16:08 V31069ENM
Qualifiers/
Definitions
Dilution FactorDFAnalyte detected in blankB
Method Quantitation LimitMQLEstimated valueJ
Page 8 of 23
,
REPORT OF ANALYSISReport Number :
Project
Information :
NC 28203
23-076-0013
01102
Hart & Hickman (Charlotte)
2923 South Tryon St. Ste 100
Juliana Lima
Charlotte
Received : 03/17/2023
LEH-004
Report Date : 03/22/2023
Sample ID :
Lab No :
Sampled:MP-DUP
91440 Matrix:
3/17/2023 0:00
Air
Analytical Method:
Prep Method:
Test Results Units MDL MQL By Analytical
Batch
Date / Time
Analyzed
DF
TO-15 Prep
TO-15 Prep Batch(es):V31062 03/21/23 09:00 V31081 03/17/23 09:00
9.32 µg/m3 0.242 0.860Propene 1 03/21/23 16:08 V31069ENM
0.494 J µg/m3 0.124 2.13Styrene 1 03/21/23 16:08 V31069ENM
<0.104 µg/m3 0.104 3.431,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 1 03/21/23 16:08 V31069ENM
<0.181 µg/m3 0.181 3.39Tetrachloroethene 1 03/21/23 16:08 V31069ENM
670 µg/m3 2.14 29.5Tetrahydrofuran 20 03/17/23 14:48 V31084ENM
1.97 µg/m3 0.090 1.88Toluene 1 03/21/23 16:08 V31069ENM
<0.209 µg/m3 0.209 3.711,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 1 03/21/23 16:08 V31069ENM
<0.144 µg/m3 0.144 2.731,1,1-Trichloroethane 1 03/21/23 16:08 V31069ENM
<0.087 µg/m3 0.087 2.73
1,1,2-Trichloroethane 1 03/21/23 16:08 V31069ENM
11.8 µg/m3 0.199 2.15Trichloroethene 1 03/21/23 16:08 V31069ENM
1.90 J µg/m3 0.130 2.81Trichlorofluoromethane 1 03/21/23 16:08 V31069ENM
4.47 µg/m3 0.110 2.461,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 1 03/21/23 16:08 V31069ENM
3.47 µg/m3 0.236 2.461,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 1 03/21/23 16:08 V31069ENM
<0.224 µg/m3 0.224 1.76Vinyl Acetate 1 03/21/23 16:08 V31069ENM
<0.127 µg/m3 0.127 1.28Vinyl Chloride 1 03/21/23 16:08 V31069ENM
2.92 µg/m3 0.157 2.17
o-Xylene 1 03/21/23 16:08 V31069ENM
0.655 J µg/m3 0.217 5.65m,p-Xylene 1 03/21/23 16:08 V31069ENM
3.58 J µg/m3 0.157 2.17Xylene (Total)1 03/21/23 16:08 V31069
Surrogate: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 106 Limits: 70-130%03/21/23 16:081 ENM V31069
Surrogate: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 98.0 Limits: 70-130%03/17/23 14:4820 ENM V31084
Qualifiers/
Definitions
Dilution FactorDFAnalyte detected in blankB
Method Quantitation LimitMQLEstimated valueJ
Page 9 of 23
,
REPORT OF ANALYSISReport Number :
Project
Information :
NC 28203
23-076-0013
01102
Hart & Hickman (Charlotte)
2923 South Tryon St. Ste 100
Juliana Lima
Charlotte
Received : 03/17/2023
LEH-004
Report Date : 03/22/2023
Sample ID :
Lab No :
Sampled:MP-4
91441 Matrix:
3/17/2023 9:55
Air
Analytical Method:
Prep Method:
Test Results Units MDL MQL By Analytical
Batch
Date / Time
Analyzed
DF
TO-15 Prep
TO-15 Prep Batch(es):V31062 03/21/23 09:00 V31081 03/17/23 09:00
280 µg/m3 4.04 95.0Acetone 20 03/17/23 15:25 V31084ENM
0.824 J µg/m3 0.073 1.60Benzene 1 03/21/23 17:00 V31069ENM
<0.147 µg/m3 0.147 10.4Benzyl Chloride 1 03/21/23 17:00 V31069ENM
<0.150 µg/m3 0.150 3.35Bromodichloromethane 1 03/21/23 17:00 V31069ENM
<0.153 µg/m3 0.153 5.17Bromoform 1 03/21/23 17:00 V31069ENM
<0.115 µg/m3 0.115 1.94Bromomethane 1 03/21/23 17:00 V31069ENM
<0.328 µg/m3 0.328 1.111,3-Butadiene 1 03/21/23 17:00 V31069ENM
<0.060 µg/m3 0.060 6.23Carbon Disulfide 1 03/21/23 17:00 V31069ENM
<0.155 µg/m3 0.155 3.15
Carbon Tetrachloride 1 03/21/23 17:00 V31069ENM
<0.107 µg/m3 0.107 2.30Chlorobenzene 1 03/21/23 17:00 V31069ENM
<0.208 µg/m3 0.208 4.26Chlorodibromomethane 1 03/21/23 17:00 V31069ENM
<0.164 µg/m3 0.164 1.32Chloroethane 1 03/21/23 17:00 V31069ENM
0.722 J µg/m3 0.086 2.44Chloroform 1 03/21/23 17:00 V31069ENM
<0.067 µg/m3 0.067 1.03Chloromethane 1 03/21/23 17:00 V31069ENM
<0.161 µg/m3 0.161 3.44Cyclohexane 1 03/21/23 17:00 V31069ENM
<0.151 µg/m3 0.151 3.84
1,2-Dibromoethane 1 03/21/23 17:00 V31069ENM
<0.096 µg/m3 0.096 3.011,2-Dichlorobenzene 1 03/21/23 17:00 V31069ENM
<0.174 µg/m3 0.174 12.01,3-Dichlorobenzene 1 03/21/23 17:00 V31069ENM
4.70 µg/m3 0.186 3.011,4-Dichlorobenzene 1 03/21/23 17:00 V31069ENM
3.11 µg/m3 0.134 2.47Dichlorodifluoromethane 1 03/21/23 17:00 V31069ENM
<0.101 µg/m3 0.101 2.021,1-Dichloroethane 1 03/21/23 17:00 V31069ENM
<0.129 µg/m3 0.129 2.021,2-Dichloroethane 1 03/21/23 17:00 V31069ENM
Qualifiers/
Definitions
Dilution FactorDFAnalyte detected in blankB
Method Quantitation LimitMQLEstimated valueJ
Page 10 of 23
,
REPORT OF ANALYSISReport Number :
Project
Information :
NC 28203
23-076-0013
01102
Hart & Hickman (Charlotte)
2923 South Tryon St. Ste 100
Juliana Lima
Charlotte
Received : 03/17/2023
LEH-004
Report Date : 03/22/2023
Sample ID :
Lab No :
Sampled:MP-4
91441 Matrix:
3/17/2023 9:55
Air
Analytical Method:
Prep Method:
Test Results Units MDL MQL By Analytical
Batch
Date / Time
Analyzed
DF
TO-15 Prep
TO-15 Prep Batch(es):V31062 03/21/23 09:00 V31081 03/17/23 09:00
<0.107 µg/m3 0.107 1.981,1-Dichloroethene 1 03/21/23 17:00 V31069ENM
2.14 µg/m3 0.095 1.98cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 1 03/21/23 17:00 V31069ENM
<0.108 µg/m3 0.108 1.98trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 1 03/21/23 17:00 V31069ENM
<0.205 µg/m3 0.205 2.311,2-Dichloropropane 1 03/21/23 17:00 V31069ENM
<0.622 µg/m3 0.622 3.501,2-Dichlorotetrafluoroethane 1 03/21/23 17:00 V31069ENM
<0.178 µg/m3 0.178 2.27cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 1 03/21/23 17:00 V31069ENM
<0.178 µg/m3 0.178 2.27trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 1 03/21/23 17:00 V31069ENM
<0.435 µg/m3 0.435 1.801,4-Dioxane 1 03/21/23 17:00 V31069ENM
<0.136 µg/m3 0.136 1.80
Ethyl Acetate 1 03/21/23 17:00 V31069ENM
<0.106 µg/m3 0.106 2.17Ethylbenzene 1 03/21/23 17:00 V31069ENM
4.22 µg/m3 0.128 2.464-Ethyltoluene 1 03/21/23 17:00 V31069ENM
<0.561 µg/m3 0.561 3.831,1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-trifluoroethane 1 03/21/23 17:00 V31069ENM
3.34 µg/m3 0.143 2.05Heptane 1 03/21/23 17:00 V31069ENM
<0.330 µg/m3 0.330 5.33Hexachlorobutadiene 1 03/21/23 17:00 V31069ENM
2.01 µg/m3 0.047 1.76n-Hexane 1 03/21/23 17:00 V31069ENM
<0.285 µg/m3 0.285 2.05
2-Hexanone 1 03/21/23 17:00 V31069ENM
5.37 B µg/m3 0.139 4.92Isopropyl Alcohol 1 03/21/23 17:00 V31069ENM
603 µg/m3 4.48 29.5Methyl Ethyl Ketone (MEK)20 03/17/23 15:25 V31084ENM
<0.033 µg/m3 0.033 1.80Methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE)1 03/21/23 17:00 V31069ENM
<0.121 µg/m3 0.121 2.054-Methyl-2-Pentanone 1 03/21/23 17:00 V31069ENM
5.01 µg/m3 0.488 1.74Methylene Chloride 1 03/21/23 17:00 V31069ENM
6.43 µg/m3 0.183 2.62Naphthalene 1 03/21/23 17:00 V31069ENM
Qualifiers/
Definitions
Dilution FactorDFAnalyte detected in blankB
Method Quantitation LimitMQLEstimated valueJ
Page 11 of 23
,
REPORT OF ANALYSISReport Number :
Project
Information :
NC 28203
23-076-0013
01102
Hart & Hickman (Charlotte)
2923 South Tryon St. Ste 100
Juliana Lima
Charlotte
Received : 03/17/2023
LEH-004
Report Date : 03/22/2023
Sample ID :
Lab No :
Sampled:MP-4
91441 Matrix:
3/17/2023 9:55
Air
Analytical Method:
Prep Method:
Test Results Units MDL MQL By Analytical
Batch
Date / Time
Analyzed
DF
TO-15 Prep
TO-15 Prep Batch(es):V31062 03/21/23 09:00 V31081 03/17/23 09:00
9.56 µg/m3 0.242 0.860Propene 1 03/21/23 17:00 V31069ENM
0.451 J µg/m3 0.124 2.13Styrene 1 03/21/23 17:00 V31069ENM
<0.104 µg/m3 0.104 3.431,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 1 03/21/23 17:00 V31069ENM
<0.181 µg/m3 0.181 3.39Tetrachloroethene 1 03/21/23 17:00 V31069ENM
692 µg/m3 2.14 29.5Tetrahydrofuran 20 03/17/23 15:25 V31084ENM
2.07 µg/m3 0.090 1.88Toluene 1 03/21/23 17:00 V31069ENM
<0.209 µg/m3 0.209 3.711,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 1 03/21/23 17:00 V31069ENM
<0.144 µg/m3 0.144 2.731,1,1-Trichloroethane 1 03/21/23 17:00 V31069ENM
<0.087 µg/m3 0.087 2.73
1,1,2-Trichloroethane 1 03/21/23 17:00 V31069ENM
12.3 µg/m3 0.199 2.15Trichloroethene 1 03/21/23 17:00 V31069ENM
1.93 J µg/m3 0.130 2.81Trichlorofluoromethane 1 03/21/23 17:00 V31069ENM
4.21 µg/m3 0.110 2.461,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 1 03/21/23 17:00 V31069ENM
3.42 µg/m3 0.236 2.461,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 1 03/21/23 17:00 V31069ENM
<0.224 µg/m3 0.224 1.76Vinyl Acetate 1 03/21/23 17:00 V31069ENM
<0.127 µg/m3 0.127 1.28Vinyl Chloride 1 03/21/23 17:00 V31069ENM
2.81 µg/m3 0.157 2.17
o-Xylene 1 03/21/23 17:00 V31069ENM
0.499 J µg/m3 0.217 5.65m,p-Xylene 1 03/21/23 17:00 V31069ENM
3.31 J µg/m3 0.157 2.17Xylene (Total)1 03/21/23 17:00 V31069
Surrogate: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 108 Limits: 70-130%03/21/23 17:001 ENM V31069
Surrogate: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 98.9 Limits: 70-130%03/17/23 15:2520 ENM V31084
Qualifiers/
Definitions
Dilution FactorDFAnalyte detected in blankB
Method Quantitation LimitMQLEstimated valueJ
Page 12 of 23
,
REPORT OF ANALYSISReport Number :
Project
Information :
NC 28203
23-076-0013
01102
Hart & Hickman (Charlotte)
2923 South Tryon St. Ste 100
Juliana Lima
Charlotte
Received : 03/17/2023
LEH-004
Report Date : 03/22/2023
Sample ID :
Lab No :
Sampled:MP-6
91442 Matrix:
3/17/2023 11:03
Air
Analytical Method:
Prep Method:
Test Results Units MDL MQL By Analytical
Batch
Date / Time
Analyzed
DF
TO-15 Prep
TO-15 Prep Batch(es):V31062 03/21/23 09:00 V31081 03/17/23 09:00
418 µg/m3 4.04 95.0Acetone 20 03/17/23 16:02 V31084ENM
1.77 µg/m3 0.073 1.60Benzene 1 03/21/23 17:53 V31069ENM
<0.147 µg/m3 0.147 10.4Benzyl Chloride 1 03/21/23 17:53 V31069ENM
<0.150 µg/m3 0.150 3.35Bromodichloromethane 1 03/21/23 17:53 V31069ENM
<0.153 µg/m3 0.153 5.17Bromoform 1 03/21/23 17:53 V31069ENM
<0.115 µg/m3 0.115 1.94Bromomethane 1 03/21/23 17:53 V31069ENM
<0.328 µg/m3 0.328 1.111,3-Butadiene 1 03/21/23 17:53 V31069ENM
0.255 J µg/m3 0.060 6.23Carbon Disulfide 1 03/21/23 17:53 V31069ENM
<0.155 µg/m3 0.155 3.15
Carbon Tetrachloride 1 03/21/23 17:53 V31069ENM
0.326 J µg/m3 0.107 2.30Chlorobenzene 1 03/21/23 17:53 V31069ENM
<0.208 µg/m3 0.208 4.26Chlorodibromomethane 1 03/21/23 17:53 V31069ENM
<0.164 µg/m3 0.164 1.32Chloroethane 1 03/21/23 17:53 V31069ENM
1.60 J µg/m3 0.086 2.44Chloroform 1 03/21/23 17:53 V31069ENM
<0.067 µg/m3 0.067 1.03Chloromethane 1 03/21/23 17:53 V31069ENM
1.68 J µg/m3 0.161 3.44Cyclohexane 1 03/21/23 17:53 V31069ENM
<0.151 µg/m3 0.151 3.84
1,2-Dibromoethane 1 03/21/23 17:53 V31069ENM
<0.096 µg/m3 0.096 3.011,2-Dichlorobenzene 1 03/21/23 17:53 V31069ENM
<0.174 µg/m3 0.174 12.01,3-Dichlorobenzene 1 03/21/23 17:53 V31069ENM
<0.186 µg/m3 0.186 3.011,4-Dichlorobenzene 1 03/21/23 17:53 V31069ENM
2.96 µg/m3 0.134 2.47Dichlorodifluoromethane 1 03/21/23 17:53 V31069ENM
<0.101 µg/m3 0.101 2.021,1-Dichloroethane 1 03/21/23 17:53 V31069ENM
<0.129 µg/m3 0.129 2.021,2-Dichloroethane 1 03/21/23 17:53 V31069ENM
Qualifiers/
Definitions
Dilution FactorDFAnalyte detected in blankB
Method Quantitation LimitMQLEstimated valueJ
Page 13 of 23
,
REPORT OF ANALYSISReport Number :
Project
Information :
NC 28203
23-076-0013
01102
Hart & Hickman (Charlotte)
2923 South Tryon St. Ste 100
Juliana Lima
Charlotte
Received : 03/17/2023
LEH-004
Report Date : 03/22/2023
Sample ID :
Lab No :
Sampled:MP-6
91442 Matrix:
3/17/2023 11:03
Air
Analytical Method:
Prep Method:
Test Results Units MDL MQL By Analytical
Batch
Date / Time
Analyzed
DF
TO-15 Prep
TO-15 Prep Batch(es):V31062 03/21/23 09:00 V31081 03/17/23 09:00
<0.107 µg/m3 0.107 1.981,1-Dichloroethene 1 03/21/23 17:53 V31069ENM
2.95 µg/m3 0.095 1.98cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 1 03/21/23 17:53 V31069ENM
<0.108 µg/m3 0.108 1.98trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 1 03/21/23 17:53 V31069ENM
<0.205 µg/m3 0.205 2.311,2-Dichloropropane 1 03/21/23 17:53 V31069ENM
<0.622 µg/m3 0.622 3.501,2-Dichlorotetrafluoroethane 1 03/21/23 17:53 V31069ENM
<0.178 µg/m3 0.178 2.27cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 1 03/21/23 17:53 V31069ENM
<0.178 µg/m3 0.178 2.27trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 1 03/21/23 17:53 V31069ENM
<0.435 µg/m3 0.435 1.801,4-Dioxane 1 03/21/23 17:53 V31069ENM
<0.136 µg/m3 0.136 1.80
Ethyl Acetate 1 03/21/23 17:53 V31069ENM
0.490 J µg/m3 0.106 2.17Ethylbenzene 1 03/21/23 17:53 V31069ENM
4.25 µg/m3 0.128 2.464-Ethyltoluene 1 03/21/23 17:53 V31069ENM
<0.561 µg/m3 0.561 3.831,1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-trifluoroethane 1 03/21/23 17:53 V31069ENM
3.34 µg/m3 0.143 2.05Heptane 1 03/21/23 17:53 V31069ENM
<0.330 µg/m3 0.330 5.33Hexachlorobutadiene 1 03/21/23 17:53 V31069ENM
<0.047 µg/m3 0.047 1.76n-Hexane 1 03/21/23 17:53 V31069ENM
<0.285 µg/m3 0.285 2.05
2-Hexanone 1 03/21/23 17:53 V31069ENM
3.78 JB µg/m3 0.139 4.92Isopropyl Alcohol 1 03/21/23 17:53 V31069ENM
2510 µg/m3 4.48 29.5Methyl Ethyl Ketone (MEK)20 03/17/23 16:02 V31084ENM
<0.033 µg/m3 0.033 1.80Methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE)1 03/21/23 17:53 V31069ENM
<0.121 µg/m3 0.121 2.054-Methyl-2-Pentanone 1 03/21/23 17:53 V31069ENM
3.38 µg/m3 0.488 1.74Methylene Chloride 1 03/21/23 17:53 V31069ENM
6.46 µg/m3 0.183 2.62Naphthalene 1 03/21/23 17:53 V31069ENM
Qualifiers/
Definitions
Dilution FactorDFAnalyte detected in blankB
Method Quantitation LimitMQLEstimated valueJ
Page 14 of 23
,
REPORT OF ANALYSISReport Number :
Project
Information :
NC 28203
23-076-0013
01102
Hart & Hickman (Charlotte)
2923 South Tryon St. Ste 100
Juliana Lima
Charlotte
Received : 03/17/2023
LEH-004
Report Date : 03/22/2023
Sample ID :
Lab No :
Sampled:MP-6
91442 Matrix:
3/17/2023 11:03
Air
Analytical Method:
Prep Method:
Test Results Units MDL MQL By Analytical
Batch
Date / Time
Analyzed
DF
TO-15 Prep
TO-15 Prep Batch(es):V31062 03/21/23 09:00 V31081 03/17/23 09:00
8.35 µg/m3 0.242 0.860Propene 1 03/21/23 17:53 V31069ENM
2.23 µg/m3 0.124 2.13Styrene 1 03/21/23 17:53 V31069ENM
<0.104 µg/m3 0.104 3.431,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 1 03/21/23 17:53 V31069ENM
0.474 J µg/m3 0.181 3.39Tetrachloroethene 1 03/21/23 17:53 V31069ENM
2580 µg/m3 2.14 29.5Tetrahydrofuran 20 03/17/23 16:02 V31084ENM
10.3 µg/m3 0.090 1.88Toluene 1 03/21/23 17:53 V31069ENM
<0.209 µg/m3 0.209 3.711,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 1 03/21/23 17:53 V31069ENM
<0.144 µg/m3 0.144 2.731,1,1-Trichloroethane 1 03/21/23 17:53 V31069ENM
<0.087 µg/m3 0.087 2.73
1,1,2-Trichloroethane 1 03/21/23 17:53 V31069ENM
223 µg/m3 0.199 2.15Trichloroethene 1 03/21/23 17:53 V31069ENM
1.88 J µg/m3 0.130 2.81Trichlorofluoromethane 1 03/21/23 17:53 V31069ENM
4.32 µg/m3 0.110 2.461,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 1 03/21/23 17:53 V31069ENM
3.46 µg/m3 0.236 2.461,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 1 03/21/23 17:53 V31069ENM
<0.224 µg/m3 0.224 1.76Vinyl Acetate 1 03/21/23 17:53 V31069ENM
<0.127 µg/m3 0.127 1.28Vinyl Chloride 1 03/21/23 17:53 V31069ENM
3.06 µg/m3 0.157 2.17
o-Xylene 1 03/21/23 17:53 V31069ENM
1.04 J µg/m3 0.217 5.65m,p-Xylene 1 03/21/23 17:53 V31069ENM
4.10 J µg/m3 0.157 2.17Xylene (Total)1 03/21/23 17:53 V31069
Surrogate: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 111 Limits: 70-130%03/21/23 17:531 ENM V31069
Surrogate: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 100 Limits: 70-130%03/17/23 16:0220 ENM V31084
Qualifiers/
Definitions
Dilution FactorDFAnalyte detected in blankB
Method Quantitation LimitMQLEstimated valueJ
Page 15 of 23
Quality Control Data
23-076-0013Report No:
Project Description:
Client ID:Hart & Hickman (Charlotte)
LEH-004
QC Prep Batch Method:
Volatile Organic Compounds in Air- GC/MS
TO-15
V31069QC Analytical Batch(es):
Analysis Method:
Analysis Description:
TO-15 Prep
QC Prep:V31062
Associated Lab Samples: 91440, 91441, 91442
LRB-V31062 Matrix: AIRLab Reagent Blank
Parameter
AnalyzedMQLMDLBlank
ResultUnits
%
Recovery
% Rec
Limits
03/21/23 11:191.600.073<0.073µg/m3Benzene
03/21/23 11:1910.40.147<0.147µg/m3Benzyl Chloride
03/21/23 11:193.350.150<0.150µg/m3Bromodichloromethane
03/21/23 11:195.170.153<0.153µg/m3Bromoform
03/21/23 11:191.940.115<0.115µg/m3Bromomethane
03/21/23 11:191.110.328<0.328µg/m31,3-Butadiene
03/21/23 11:196.230.060<0.060µg/m3Carbon Disulfide
03/21/23 11:193.150.155<0.155µg/m3Carbon Tetrachloride
03/21/23 11:192.300.107<0.107µg/m3Chlorobenzene
03/21/23 11:194.260.208<0.208µg/m3Chlorodibromomethane
03/21/23 11:191.320.164<0.164µg/m3Chloroethane
03/21/23 11:192.440.086<0.086µg/m3Chloroform
03/21/23 11:191.030.067<0.067µg/m3Chloromethane
03/21/23 11:193.440.161<0.161µg/m3Cyclohexane
03/21/23 11:193.840.151<0.151µg/m31,2-Dibromoethane
03/21/23 11:193.010.096<0.096µg/m31,2-Dichlorobenzene
03/21/23 11:1912.00.174<0.174µg/m31,3-Dichlorobenzene
03/21/23 11:193.010.186<0.186µg/m31,4-Dichlorobenzene
03/21/23 11:192.470.134<0.134µg/m3Dichlorodifluoromethane
03/21/23 11:192.020.101<0.101µg/m31,1-Dichloroethane
03/21/23 11:192.020.129<0.129µg/m31,2-Dichloroethane
03/21/23 11:191.980.107<0.107µg/m31,1-Dichloroethene
03/21/23 11:191.980.095<0.095µg/m3cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
03/21/23 11:191.980.108<0.108µg/m3trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
03/21/23 11:192.310.205<0.205µg/m31,2-Dichloropropane
03/21/23 11:193.500.622<0.622µg/m31,2-Dichlorotetrafluoroethane
03/21/23 11:192.270.178<0.178µg/m3cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
Page 1 of 6Date:03/22/2023 04:34 PM
Page 16 of 23
Quality Control Data
23-076-0013Report No:
Project Description:
Client ID:Hart & Hickman (Charlotte)
LEH-004
QC Prep Batch Method:
Volatile Organic Compounds in Air- GC/MS
TO-15
V31069QC Analytical Batch(es):
Analysis Method:
Analysis Description:
TO-15 Prep
QC Prep:V31062
Associated Lab Samples: 91440, 91441, 91442
LRB-V31062 Matrix: AIRLab Reagent Blank
Parameter
AnalyzedMQLMDLBlank
ResultUnits
%
Recovery
% Rec
Limits
03/21/23 11:192.270.178<0.178µg/m3trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
03/21/23 11:191.800.435<0.435µg/m31,4-Dioxane
03/21/23 11:191.800.136<0.136µg/m3Ethyl Acetate
03/21/23 11:192.170.106<0.106µg/m3Ethylbenzene
03/21/23 11:192.460.128<0.128µg/m34-Ethyltoluene
03/21/23 11:193.830.561<0.561µg/m31,1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-trifluoroethane
03/21/23 11:192.050.143<0.143µg/m3Heptane
03/21/23 11:195.330.330<0.330µg/m3Hexachlorobutadiene
03/21/23 11:191.760.047<0.047µg/m3n-Hexane
03/21/23 11:192.050.285<0.285µg/m32-Hexanone
03/21/23 11:194.920.1391.85µg/m3Isopropyl Alcohol
03/21/23 11:191.800.033<0.033µg/m3Methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE)
03/21/23 11:192.050.121<0.121µg/m34-Methyl-2-Pentanone
03/21/23 11:191.740.488<0.488µg/m3Methylene Chloride
03/21/23 11:192.620.183<0.183µg/m3Naphthalene
03/21/23 11:190.8600.242<0.242µg/m3Propene
03/21/23 11:192.130.124<0.124µg/m3Styrene
03/21/23 11:193.430.104<0.104µg/m31,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
03/21/23 11:193.390.181<0.181µg/m3Tetrachloroethene
03/21/23 11:191.880.090<0.090µg/m3Toluene
03/21/23 11:193.710.209<0.209µg/m31,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
03/21/23 11:192.730.144<0.144µg/m31,1,1-Trichloroethane
03/21/23 11:192.730.087<0.087µg/m31,1,2-Trichloroethane
03/21/23 11:192.150.199<0.199µg/m3Trichloroethene
03/21/23 11:192.810.130<0.130µg/m3Trichlorofluoromethane
03/21/23 11:192.460.110<0.110µg/m31,2,4-Trimethylbenzene
03/21/23 11:192.460.236<0.236µg/m31,3,5-Trimethylbenzene
Page 2 of 6Date:03/22/2023 04:34 PM
Page 17 of 23
Quality Control Data
23-076-0013Report No:
Project Description:
Client ID:Hart & Hickman (Charlotte)
LEH-004
QC Prep Batch Method:
Volatile Organic Compounds in Air- GC/MS
TO-15
V31069QC Analytical Batch(es):
Analysis Method:
Analysis Description:
TO-15 Prep
QC Prep:V31062
Associated Lab Samples: 91440, 91441, 91442
LRB-V31062 Matrix: AIRLab Reagent Blank
Parameter
AnalyzedMQLMDLBlank
ResultUnits
%
Recovery
% Rec
Limits
03/21/23 11:191.760.224<0.224µg/m3Vinyl Acetate
03/21/23 11:191.280.127<0.127µg/m3Vinyl Chloride
03/21/23 11:192.170.157<0.157µg/m3o-Xylene
03/21/23 11:195.650.217<0.217µg/m3m,p-Xylene
03/21/23 11:194-Bromofluorobenzene (S)97.7 70-130
LCS-V31062Laboratory Control Sample
Parameter
LCS %RecLCS
Result
Spike
Conc.Units
% Rec
Limits
12319.716.0µg/m3Benzene 70-130
12432.025.9µg/m3Benzyl Chloride 70-130
12140.733.5µg/m3Bromodichloromethane 70-130
12162.551.7µg/m3Bromoform 70-130
12724.619.4µg/m3Bromomethane 70-130
12814.211.1µg/m31,3-Butadiene 70-130
12820.015.6µg/m3Carbon Disulfide 70-130
12338.731.5µg/m3Carbon Tetrachloride 70-130
12328.423.0µg/m3Chlorobenzene 70-130
12352.242.6µg/m3Chlorodibromomethane 70-130
12716.813.2µg/m3Chloroethane 70-130
12430.224.4µg/m3Chloroform 70-130
12713.110.3µg/m3Chloromethane 70-130
93.016.017.2µg/m3Cyclohexane 70-130
12548.038.4µg/m31,2-Dibromoethane 70-130
12938.930.1µg/m31,2-Dichlorobenzene 70-130
12337.130.1µg/m31,3-Dichlorobenzene 70-130
12437.430.1µg/m31,4-Dichlorobenzene 70-130
Page 3 of 6Date:03/22/2023 04:34 PM
Page 18 of 23
Quality Control Data
23-076-0013Report No:
Project Description:
Client ID:Hart & Hickman (Charlotte)
LEH-004
QC Prep Batch Method:
Volatile Organic Compounds in Air- GC/MS
TO-15
V31069QC Analytical Batch(es):
Analysis Method:
Analysis Description:
TO-15 Prep
QC Prep:V31062
LCS-V31062Laboratory Control Sample
Parameter
LCS %RecLCS
Result
Spike
Conc.Units
% Rec
Limits
12831.624.7µg/m3Dichlorodifluoromethane 70-130
12625.420.2µg/m31,1-Dichloroethane 70-130
12725.720.2µg/m31,2-Dichloroethane 70-130
12625.019.8µg/m31,1-Dichloroethene 70-130
12625.019.8µg/m3cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 70-130
12925.519.8µg/m3trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 70-130
12027.723.1µg/m31,2-Dichloropropane 70-130
12443.535.0µg/m31,2-Dichlorotetrafluoroethane 70-130
12628.722.7µg/m3cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 70-130
12628.722.7µg/m3trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 70-130
11921.518.0µg/m31,4-Dioxane 70-130
12422.318.0µg/m3Ethyl Acetate 70-130
12927.921.7µg/m3Ethylbenzene 70-130
11929.324.6µg/m34-Ethyltoluene 70-130
12447.438.3µg/m31,1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-trifluoroethane 70-130
12525.620.5µg/m3Heptane 70-130
12566.853.3µg/m3Hexachlorobutadiene 70-130
12421.917.6µg/m3n-Hexane 70-130
12325.220.5µg/m32-Hexanone 70-130
12915.912.3µg/m3Isopropyl Alcohol 70-130
12622.718.0µg/m3Methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE)70-130
12625.920.5µg/m34-Methyl-2-Pentanone 70-130
12221.217.4µg/m3Methylene Chloride 70-130
12231.926.2µg/m3Naphthalene 70-130
12811.08.61µg/m3Propene 70-130
12827.221.3µg/m3Styrene 70-130
12241.734.3µg/m31,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 70-130
Page 4 of 6Date:03/22/2023 04:34 PM
Page 19 of 23
Quality Control Data
23-076-0013Report No:
Project Description:
Client ID:Hart & Hickman (Charlotte)
LEH-004
QC Prep Batch Method:
Volatile Organic Compounds in Air- GC/MS
TO-15
V31069QC Analytical Batch(es):
Analysis Method:
Analysis Description:
TO-15 Prep
QC Prep:V31062
LCS-V31062Laboratory Control Sample
Parameter
LCS %RecLCS
Result
Spike
Conc.Units
% Rec
Limits
11940.333.9µg/m3Tetrachloroethene 70-130
12223.018.8µg/m3Toluene 70-130
12646.737.1µg/m31,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 70-130
12333.727.3µg/m31,1,1-Trichloroethane 70-130
12333.527.3µg/m31,1,2-Trichloroethane 70-130
12132.526.9µg/m3Trichloroethene 70-130
12635.328.1µg/m3Trichlorofluoromethane 70-130
12230.124.6µg/m31,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 70-130
12230.024.6µg/m31,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 70-130
12421.917.6µg/m3Vinyl Acetate 70-130
12716.312.8µg/m3Vinyl Chloride 70-130
12026.121.7µg/m3o-Xylene 70-130
10445.143.4µg/m3m,p-Xylene 70-130
98.04-Bromofluorobenzene (S)70-130
Page 5 of 6Date:03/22/2023 04:34 PM
Page 20 of 23
Quality Control Data
23-076-0013Report No:
Project Description:
Client ID:Hart & Hickman (Charlotte)
LEH-004
QC Prep Batch Method:
Volatile Organic Compounds in Air- GC/MS
TO-15
V31084QC Analytical Batch(es):
Analysis Method:
Analysis Description:
TO-15 Prep
QC Prep:V31081
Associated Lab Samples: 91440, 91441, 91442
LRB-V31081 Matrix: AIRLab Reagent Blank
Parameter
AnalyzedMQLMDLBlank
ResultUnits
%
Recovery
% Rec
Limits
03/17/23 11:104.750.2020.838µg/m3Acetone
03/17/23 11:101.470.224<0.224µg/m3Methyl Ethyl Ketone (MEK)
03/17/23 11:101.470.107<0.107µg/m3Tetrahydrofuran
03/17/23 11:104-Bromofluorobenzene (S)91.6 70-130
LCS-V31081Laboratory Control Sample
Parameter
LCS %RecLCS
Result
Spike
Conc.Units
% Rec
Limits
10512.511.9µg/m3Acetone 70-130
12518.514.8µg/m3Methyl Ethyl Ketone (MEK)70-130
12218.014.7µg/m3Tetrahydrofuran 70-130
97.24-Bromofluorobenzene (S)70-130
Page 6 of 6Date:03/22/2023 04:34 PM
Page 21 of 23
Fed Ex
UPS
US Postal
Client
Lab
Courier
Other :
Shipment Receipt Form
Customer Number:
Customer Name:
Report Number:23-076-0013
Hart & Hickman (Charlotte)
01102
Shipping Method
Shipping container/cooler uncompromised?
Thermometer ID:N/A
Chain of Custody (COC) present?Yes No
Yes No Not Present
Yes No Not Present
Yes No
COC agrees with sample label(s)? Yes No
COC properly completed
Samples in proper containers?
Sample containers intact?
Sufficient sample volume for indicated test(s)?
All samples received within holding time?
Cooler temperature in compliance?
Yes No
Yes No
Yes No
Yes No
Yes No
Yes NoCooler/Samples arrived at the laboratory on ice.
Samples were considered acceptable as cooling
process had begun.
Yes No
Yes No N/A
Yes No N/A
Yes No N/ASoil VOA method 5035 – compliance criteria met
Water - Sample containers properly preserved
Water - VOA vials free of headspace Yes No N/A
Trip Blanks received with VOAs
Low concentration EnCore samplers (48 hr)
High concentration pre-weighed (methanol -14 d) Low conc pre-weighed vials (Sod Bis -14 d)
High concentration container (48 hr)
Custody seals intact on shipping container/cooler?
Custody seals intact on sample bottles?
Number of coolers/boxes received
Yes No
1
Signature:Angelo Norvell Date & Time:03/17/2023 14:35:56
Special precautions or instructions included?
Comments:
Page 22 of 23
Page 23 of 23

Appendix G
DEQ Risk Calculator Summary Pages

Version Date:
Basis:
Site Name:
Site Address:
DEQ Section:
Site ID:
Exposure Unit ID:
Submittal Date:
Reviewed By:
Sub-Slab Worst Case
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
Risk Calculator
Quality Products Co.
1513 South Mint Street, Charlotte, North Carolina
DWM Brownfields
22016-18-060
January 2023
November 2022 EPA RSL Table
3/23/2023
Prepared By:Hart & Hickman
Hart & Hickman
North Carolina DEQ Risk Calculator
Table of Contents
Version Date: January 2023
Basis: November 2022 EPA RSL Table
Site ID: 22016-18-060
Exposure Unit ID: Sub-Slab Worst Case
Form No.
Input Form 1A Complete Exposure Pathways
Input Form 1B Exposure Factors and Target Risks
Input Form 1C Contaminant Migration Parameters
Input Form 1D Sample Statistics
Input Form 2A Soil Exposure Point Concentration Table
Input Form 2B Groundwater Exposure Point Concentration Table
Input Form 2C Surface Water Exposure Point Concentration Table
Input Form 2D Soil Gas Exposure Point Concentration Table
Input Form 2E Indoor Air Exposure Point Concentration Table
Output Form 1A Risk for Individual Pathways
Output Form 1B Sitewide Risk
Output Form 2A Resident Soil
Output Form 2B Resident Groundwater Use
Output Form 2C Non-Residential Worker Soil
Output Form 2D Non-Residential Worker Groundwater Use
Output Form 2E Construction Worker Soil
Output Form 2F Recreator/Trespasser Soil
Output Form 2G Recreator/Trespasser Surface Water
Output Form 3A Resident Groundwater to Indoor Air
Output Form 3B Resident Soil Gas to Indoor Air
Output Form 3C Resident Indoor Air
Output Form 3D Non-Residential Worker Groundwater to Indoor Air
Output Form 3E Non-Residential Worker Soil Gas to Indoor Air
Output Form 3F Non-Residential Worker Indoor Air
Output Form 4A Soil to Groundwater - Forward Mode
Output Form 4B Groundwater to Groundwater - Forward Mode
Output Form 4C Soil to Surface Water - Forward Mode
Output Form 4D Groundwater to Surface Water - Forward Mode
Output Form 4E Soil to Groundwater - Backward Mode
Output Form 4F Groundwater to Groundwater - Backward Mode
Output Form 4G Soil to Surface Water - Backward Mode
Output Form 4H Groundwater to Surface Water - Backward Mode
Output Section 4 - Contaminant Migration Worksheets
Output Section 3 - Vapor Intrusion Calculators
TOC
Description
DATA INPUT SHEETS
Check box
if included
Input Section 1 - Exposure Pathways & Parameters
Input Section 2 - Exposure Point Concentrations
DATA OUTPUT SHEETS
Output Section 1 - Summary Output for All Calculators
Output Section 2 - Direct Contact Soil and Groundwater Calculators
North Carolina DEQ Risk Calculator
Complete Exposure Pathways
Version Date: January 2023
Basis: November 2022 EPA RSL Table
Site ID: 22016-18-060
Exposure Unit ID: Sub-Slab Worst Case
Note: Risk output will only be calculated for complete exposure pathways.
Receptor Pathway
Check box if
pathway
complete
Soil
Groundwater Use
Soil
Groundwater Use
Construction Worker Soil
Soil
Surface Water
Groundwater to Indoor Air
Soil Gas to Indoor Air
Indoor Air
Groundwater to Indoor Air
Soil Gas to Indoor Air
Indoor Air
Source Soil
Source Groundwater
Source Soil
Source Groundwater
Resident
Non-Residential Worker
CONTAMINANT MIGRATION PATHWAYS
Groundwater
Surface Water
Input Form 1A
VAPOR INTRUSION PATHWAYS
DIRECT CONTACT SOIL AND WATER PATHWAYS
Resident
Non-Residential Worker
Recreator/Trespasser
North Carolina DEQ Risk Calculator
Exposure Point Concentrations
Version Date: January 2023
Basis: November 2022 EPA RSL Table
Site ID: 22016-18-060
Exposure Unit ID: Sub-Slab Worst Case
Description of Exposure Point Concentration Selection:
Exposure Point Concentration
(ug/m3)
Notes:CAS Number Chemical Minimum
Concentration (Qualifier)
Maximum
Concentration (Qualifier)
Units Location of
Maximum Concentration
Detection
Frequency
Range of
Detection Limits
Concentration
Used for Screening
Background
Value
Screening
Toxicity Value
(Screening Level) (n/c)
Potential
ARAR/TBC
Value
Potential
ARAR/TBC
Source
COPC Flag
(Y/N)
Rationale for
Selection or
Deletion
418 MP-6 67-64-1 Acetone ug/m3
1.77 MP-6 71-43-2 Benzene ug/m3
0.255 MP-6 75-15-0 Carbon Disulfide ug/m3
0.326 MP-6 108-90-7 Chlorobenzene ug/m3
1.6 MP-6 67-66-3 Chloroform ug/m3
1.68 MP-6 110-82-7 Cyclohexane ug/m3
4.7 MP-4 106-46-7 Dichlorobenzene, 1,4-ug/m3
3.11 MP-4 75-71-8 Dichlorodifluoromethane ug/m3
2.95 MP-6 156-59-2 Dichloroethylene, cis-1,2-ug/m3
0.49 MP-6 100-41-4 Ethylbenzene ug/m3
2580 MP-6 109-99-9 ~Tetrahydrofuran ug/m3
3.34 MP-4/MP-6 142-82-5 Heptane, N-ug/m3
2.01 MP-4 110-54-3 Hexane, N-ug/m3
5.37 MP-4 67-63-0 Isopropanol ug/m3
2510 MP-6 78-93-3 Methyl Ethyl Ketone (2-Butanone)ug/m3
5.01 MP-4 75-09-2 Methylene Chloride ug/m3
6.55 MP-DUP 91-20-3 ~Naphthalene ug/m3
9.56 MP-4 115-07-1 Propylene ug/m3
2.23 MP-6 100-42-5 Styrene ug/m3
0.474 MP-6 127-18-4 Tetrachloroethylene ug/m3
10.3 MP-6 108-88-3 Toluene ug/m3
223 MP-6 79-01-6 Trichloroethylene ug/m3
1.93 MP-4 75-69-4 Trichlorofluoromethane ug/m3
4.47 MP-DUP 95-63-6 Trimethylbenzene, 1,2,4-ug/m3
3.47 MP-DUP 108-67-8 Trimethylbenzene, 1,3,5-ug/m3
4.1 MP-6 1330-20-7 Xylenes ug/m3
Input Form 2D
Soil Gas Exposure Point Concentration Table
Note: Chemicals highlighted in orange are non-volatile chemicals. Since these chemicals do not pose a vapor intrusion risk, no risk values are calculated for these chemicals.If the chemical list is changed from a prior calculator run, remember to select "See All Chemicals" on the data output sheet or newly added chemicals will not be included in risk calculations
North Carolina DEQ Risk Calculator
DEQ Risk Calculator - Vapor Intrusion - Non-Residential Worker Soil Gas to Indoor Air
Version Date: January 2023
Basis: November 2022 EPA RSL Table
Site ID: 22016-18-060
Exposure Unit ID: Sub-Slab Worst Case
CAS #Chemical Name:
Soil Gas
Concentration
(ug/m3)
Calculated
Indoor Air Concentration
(ug/m3)
Target Indoor
Air Conc. for
Carcinogens @
TCR = 1E-06
Target Indoor Air
Conc. for Non-
Carcinogens @
THQ = 0.2
Calculated Carcinogenic Risk
Calculated Non-Carcinogenic Hazard
Quotient
67-64-1 Acetone 418 4.18 --
71-43-2 Benzene 1.77 0.0177 1.6E+00 2.6E+01 1.1E-08 1.3E-04
75-15-0 Carbon Disulfide 0.255 0.00255 -6.1E+02 8.3E-07
108-90-7 Chlorobenzene 0.326 0.00326 -4.4E+01 1.5E-05
67-66-3 Chloroform 1.6 0.016 5.3E-01 8.6E+01 3.0E-08 3.7E-05
110-82-7 Cyclohexane 1.68 0.0168 -5.3E+03 6.4E-07106-46-7 Dichlorobenzene, 1,4-4.7 0.047 1.1E+00 7.0E+02 4.2E-08 1.3E-0575-71-8 Dichlorodifluoromethane 3.11 0.0311 -8.8E+01 7.1E-05156-59-2 Dichloroethylene, cis-1,2-2.95 0.0295 -3.5E+01 1.7E-04100-41-4 Ethylbenzene 0.49 0.0049 4.9E+00 8.8E+02 1.0E-09 1.1E-06
109-99-9 ~Tetrahydrofuran 2580 25.8 -1.8E+03 2.9E-03
142-82-5 Heptane, N-3.34 0.0334 -3.5E+02 1.9E-05
110-54-3 Hexane, N-2.01 0.0201 -6.1E+02 6.6E-0667-63-0 Isopropanol 5.37 0.0537 -1.8E+02 6.1E-0578-93-3 Methyl Ethyl Ketone (2-Butanone)2510 25.1 -4.4E+03 1.1E-0375-09-2 Methylene Chloride 5.01 0.0501 1.2E+03 5.3E+02 4.1E-11 1.9E-05
91-20-3 ~Naphthalene 6.55 0.0655 3.6E-01 2.6E+00 1.8E-07 5.0E-03
115-07-1 Propylene 9.56 0.0956 -2.6E+03 7.3E-06
100-42-5 Styrene 2.23 0.0223 -8.8E+02 5.1E-06
127-18-4 Tetrachloroethylene 0.474 0.00474 4.7E+01 3.5E+01 1.0E-10 2.7E-05
108-88-3 Toluene 10.3 0.103 -4.4E+03 4.7E-06
79-01-6 Trichloroethylene 223 2.23 3.0E+00 1.8E+00 7.5E-07 2.5E-0175-69-4 Trichlorofluoromethane 1.93 0.0193 --
95-63-6 Trimethylbenzene, 1,2,4-4.47 0.0447 -5.3E+01 1.7E-04
108-67-8 Trimethylbenzene, 1,3,5-3.47 0.0347 -5.3E+01 1.3E-04
1330-20-7 Xylenes 4.1 0.041 -8.8E+01 9.4E-05
Cumulative:1.0E-06 2.6E-01
All concentrations are in ug/m3
Output Form 3E
Carcinogenic risk and hazard quotient cells highlighted in orange are associated with non-volatile chemicals. Since these chemicals do not pose a vapor intrusion
risk, no risk values are calculated for these chemicals.
North Carolina DEQ Risk Calculator
Risk for Individual Pathways Output Form 1A
Version Date: January 2023
Basis: November 2022 EPA RSL Table
Site ID: 22016-18-060
Exposure Unit ID: Sub-Slab Worst Case
Receptor Pathway Carcinogenic
Risk Hazard Index Risk exceeded?
Soil NC NC NC
Groundwater Use*NC NC NC
Soil NC NC NC
Groundwater Use*NC NC NC
Construction Worker Soil NC NC NC
Soil NC NC NC
Surface Water*NC NC NC
Receptor Pathway Carcinogenic Risk Hazard Index Risk exceeded?
Groundwater to Indoor Air NC NC NC
Soil Gas to Indoor Air NC NC NC
Indoor Air NC NC NC
Groundwater to Indoor Air NC NC NC
Soil Gas to Indoor Air 1.0E-06 2.6E-01 NO
Indoor Air NC NC NC
Pathway Source
Source Soil NC
Source Groundwater NC
Source Soil NC
Source Groundwater NC
Groundwater Exceedence of 2L at Receptor?
Exceedence of 2L at Receptor?
1. If lead concentrations were entered in the exposure point concentration tables, see the individual calculator sheets for lead
concentrations in comparison to screening levels. Note that lead is not included in cumulative risk calculations.
Notes:
3. NM = Not modeled, user did not check this pathway as complete.
4. NC = Pathway not calculated, required contaminant migration parameters were not entered.
DIRECT CONTACT SOIL AND WATER CALCULATORS
Resident
Non-Residential Worker
Recreator/Trespasser
2. * = If concentrations in groundwater exceed the NC 2L Standards or IMAC, or concentrations in surface water exceed the
NC 2B Standards, appropriate remediation and/or institutional control measures will be necessary to be eligible for a risk-based
closure.
Surface Water Exceedence of 2B at Receptor?
Exceedence of 2B at Receptor?
VAPOR INTRUSION CALCULATORS
Resident
Non-Residential Worker
CONTAMINANT MIGRATION CALCULATORS
Target Receptor Concentrations Exceeded?
North Carolina DEQ Risk Calculator