RA-2069_12609_CA_RPTS_19950206_ CSA

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
LAW
ENGINEERING AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
COMPREHENSIVE SITE ASSESSMENT REPORT
CONOCO STORE NO. 33047
1122 NORTH RALEIGH STREET
ROCKY MOUNT, EDGECOMBE COUNTY, NORTH
CAROLINA
Prepared for:
Conoco Inc.
Houston, Texas r·-----
1
. ' '
FEB 7 1995 1 !:.J
by:
Law Engineering, Inc.
Charlotte, North Carolina
February 6, 1995
Law Engineering Project 56-4533
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
j. ..:~=N=GI:..:N=~:..;R.:_IN_G_A_N_D_E_N_VI_R_ON_M_E_N-TA_L_S_E_R-VI_C_ES_
February 6, 1995
Ms. Milessa Tilford
Conoco Inc. -Remediation Technology
Ponca Building, P03028
600 North Dairy Ashford
Houston. Texas 77079
Subject: Comprehensive Site Assessment Report
Conoco Store No. 33047
1122 North Raleigh Street
Rocky Mount, Edgecombe County, North Carolina
Law Engineering Project 56-4533
Dear Ms. Tilford:
As authorized by your acceptance of our Proposal for Comprehensive Sile Assessment Activities
and Corrective Action Plan Preparation, dated October 11, 1994, Law Engineering, Inc. (LAW)
is pleased to submit this Comprehensive Site Assessment Report for the Conoco Store No. 33047
in Rocky Mount, North Carolina. Included in this report are the results of assessment activities
performed at the site to date.
This report has been prepared as required under the North Carolina Administrative Code, Title
15A, Subchapter 2N (Criteria and Standards Applicable to Underground Storage Tanks) section
.0706 (Investigations for Soil and Ground-Water Cleanup), and in general accordance with the
North Carolina Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources, Division of
Environmental Management (NCDEHNR) Groundwater Section Guidelines for the Investigation
and Remediation of Soils and Groundwater (March 1993), Section 15.1 (Comprehensive Site
Assessment).
LAW ENGINEERING, INC.
280 YOAKMONT ROAD, SUITE 100 • CHAALOTIE, NC 28208
P.O. BOX 11297 • CHARLOTTE, NC 28220
(704) 357·8600 • FAX (704) 357·8639
ONE OF THE LAW COMP ... NIES (i)
Ms. Milessa Tilford
February 6, 1995
Page 2
LAW appreciates the continuing opportunity to provide our professional services to Conoco Inc.
Please contact us if there are any questions regarding the Comprehensive Site Assessment Report
or regarding the subject site.
Sincerely,
LAW ENGINEERING, INC.
./J,(}J]w (() . r vpd.~
Sharon M. Tyndall. E.I.T.
Project Engineer
~ ,,,ucuu,,,
I ,,, Po''••, ., 'I' ,, , •• •o•• (./IJt:. .,,
w.t.J'. ~-, • c.E Ns~0 .. "? '.::.
Christopher L. Corbi~ P.p. SEAL \ \
Prmctpal : 0 : lOIS i §
Registered, NC #lOti~"\., " :/::::; ~-P.•Y(; ":>'""-' ..,_,~;·· .. 9L QG\ .... ··~ l
SMT/KJM:CLC:clp •,,, Op,;[··--;-· <;_,<0 ,••'
.,, I 1. R \... , ..... ''•• ··~ .... ,,,,,,
Enclosures
/Uf!//l~
Kelly J. McBride
Staff Geologist
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
COMPREHENSIVE SITE ASSESSMENT REPORT
CONOCO STORE NO. 33047
1122 NORTH RALEIGH STREET
ROCKY MOUNT, EDGECOMBE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
Prepared for:
Conoco Inc.
Houston, Texas
by:
Law Engineering, Inc.
Charlotte, North Carolina
February 6, I995
Law Engineering Project 564533
-----------------·----· --·-------
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Conoco Store No. 33047-Comprehensive Site Assessment Report
Law Engineering Project 56-4533
TABLE OF CONTENTS
February 6, 1995
Final
LIST OF TABLES................................................................................................. iv
LIST OF FIGURES ................................................................................................ iv
I .0 SITE HISTORY AND SOURCE CHARACTERIZATION ........................................ 1-1
2.0 POTENTIAL RECEPTORS AND MIGRATION PATHWAYS ................................. 2-1
2.1 WATERWELLSURVEY ..................................................................... 2-1
2.2 AREA WATER SUPPLY ........................................................................ 2-1
2.3 SUBSURFACE UTILITIES ..................................................................... 2-2
3.0 AREA GEOLOGY ........................................................................................... 3-1
4.0 FIELD EXPLORATION ................................................................................... 4-1
4.1 SOIL TEST BORINGS AND MONITORING WELL INSTALLATION ............. 4-1
5.0 SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS ................. · .......................................................... 5-1
6.0 SOIL AND GROUND-WATER SAMPLING AND TESTING ................................. 6-1
6.1 SOIL SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS ......................................................... 6-1
6.2 GROUND-WATER SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS ...................................... 6-1
6.3 INFLOW PERMEABILITY TESTS ........................................................... 6-2
7.0 TEST RESULTS AND EVALUATION ................................................................ 7-1
7.1 SOIL ANALYTICAL RESULTS .............................................................. 7-1
7.2 GROUND-WATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS ............................................ 7-1
7.3 HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY ............................................................. 7-1
7.4 GROUND-WATER MOVEMENT ......................................................... 7-2
8.0 SUMMARY OF COMPREHENSIVE SITE ASSESSMENT ACTIVITIES ..................... 8-1
8.1 SOIL .................................................................................................. 8-1
8.2 GROUND WATER ................................................................................ 8-1
ii
Conoco Store No. 33047-Comprehensive Site Assessment Report
Law Engineering Project 56-4533
TABLE OF CONTENTS-Continued
February 6, 1995
Final
9.0 QUALIFICATION OF REPORT ......................................................................... 9-l
10.0 REFERENCES ............................................................................................. lO-t
TABLES
FIGURES
APPENDIX A: TARGET SOIL GAS SURVEY REPORT-AUGUST 1994
APPENDIX B: Boring Logs
APPENDIX C: Monitoring Well Installation Records
APPENDIX D: Laboratory Analytical Data for Soil and Chain-of-Custody Records
APPENDIX E: Laboratory Analytical Data for Ground Water and Chain-of-Custody Records
APPENDIX F: Calculations
lll
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Conoco Store No. 33047-Comprehensive Site Assessment Report
Law Engineering Project 56-4533
LIST OF TABLES
Table
Area Property Owners
2 Soil Analytical Results
3 Ground-Water Elevation Data
4 Ground-Water Analytical Results
5 Ground-Water Analytical Results -Additional Detected Constituents
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure
Site Location Map
2 Site Plan
3 Area Property Ownership Map
4 Area Water Supply Well/Off-Site Monitoring Well Location Map
5 Subsurface Utilities Map
6 Subsurface Cross Section A-A'
7 Subsurface Cross Section B-B'
8 Geoprobe Collection Points
9 Total BTEX Isopleth Map
I 0 Benzene Isopleth Map
II MTBE Isopleth Map
12 Ground-Water Contour Map
iv
February 6, 1995
Final
Conoco Store No. 33047-Comprehensive Site Assessment Report
Law Engineering Project 56-4533
February 6, 1995
Final
1.0 SITE IDSTORY AND SOURCE CHARACTERIZATION
Conoco Store No. 33047 is located at 1122 North Raleigh Street adjacent to East Grand Avenue in
Rocky Mount, Edgecombe County, North Carolina. A 7. 5-minute United States Geological Survey
(USGS) topographic quadrangle map denoting the site is provided as Figure I. The site is bounded
to the north and northeast by East Grand Avenue (Figure 2). Across East Grand Avenue northeast
of the site is a Hardees Restaurant. A gasoline station/convenience mart is located diagonally
across the intersection of East Grand Avenue and North Raleigh Street, southeast of the site.
Located southeast of the site across North Raleigh Street is an Edgecombe County Alcoholic
Beverage Control Store. To the south of the site across North Raleigh Street is a vacant lot which
may have been formerly occupied by a self service car wash facility. Adjacent to the site in a
westerly direction is a private residence. A list of area property owners is provided in Table I; the
properties described above are identified on Figure 3.
Currently, located on site are three 10,000-gallon fiberglass underground storage tanks (USTs)
containing unleaded, unleaded plus and super unleaded fuels. A 5,000-gallon UST which had
contained kerosene fuel, and four gasoline dispensers were removed and replaced at the site in
March 1994. The kerosene UST was replaced with a 4,000-gallon double-walled fiberglass UST.
Law Engineering, Inc. (LAW) was requested by Conoco in March 1994 to observe the excavation
and removal of the former UST and dispensers.
As detailed in LAW's Underground Storage Tank System Closure Report, dated August 3, 1994, a
LAW field representative on site during field activities observed the removal of the kerosene UST.
Results of the laboratory analysis of soil samples collected during removal activities indicated that
the soils in the vicinity of the kerosene UST had been impacted by hydrocarbons above North
Carolina allowable limits. Soils excavated from the basin and from beneath the dispensers were
transported to the Stalite Environmental facility in Salisbury, North Carolina for recycling;
approximately 55 tons of soil was transported and recycled. Results of laboratory analyses of a
ground-water sample collected from the UST basin during removal activities indicated that ground
water in the vicinity of the basin had not been impacted by hydrocarbons at levels above North
Carolina standards.
1-1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Conoco Store No. 33047-Comprehensive Site Assessment Report
Law Engineering Project 56-4533
February 6, I 995
Final
At the request of Conoco, representatives of LAW visited the site on April 27, 1994. The store
manager reponed the occurrence of free product in the subsurface in the vicinity of the gasoline
dispenser area. Free product was observed at the edge of the concrete pad underneath the canopy
and flowing across the pavement. A leaking shear valve in gasoline pump No. I was thought to be
the source of product, and was subsequently replaced on April 27, 1994. The valve was later
tested for tightness and maintained pressure. On April 28, 1994, a pressure test was performed on
the gasoline product lines. This test indicated a leak was present in one line near gasoline pump
No. 4. This leak was subsequently repaired.
As an initial abatement activity, LAW excavated a temporary sump at the downgradient edge of the
concrete pad/dispenser area. Subsequently, a four foot deep collection well, consisting of two feet
of PVC slotted well screen and two feet of PVC riser pipe, was installed in the hole. A locking cap
and a flush-mounted well vault were installed over the well. Product recovery activities were
initially performed twice a week. A representative from our LAW office in Raleigh, North
Carolina visited the site to measure the depth -of product in the well, remove by bailing any
accumulated product, and emptying the product into a 55-gallon storage drum located on site. Due
to lesser amounts of product being recovered, site visits to bail product were reduced to a weekly
basis and subsequently to a monthly schedule. Approximately 15 gallons of product have been
recovered from the collection well to date. LAW has subsequently discontinued product recovery
activities at the request of Conoco.
In July 1994, Target Environmental Services (Columbia, Maryland) performed a soil/gas survey
and collected soil and ground-water samples utilizing a Geoprobe. Results of the soil gas survey
are detailed in the report of Soil Gas Survey and Soil and Groundwater Sampling, prepared by
Target, dated August 1994 (included as Appendix A). As detailed in the report, two areas on site
were indicated to have high concentrations of volatiles in soils: the vicinity of the current UST
basin, and the northeast corner of the property. The geoprobe activities performed included
collection of soil and ground-water samples for laboratory analysis. Results of the laboratory
analyses of soil samples collected during geoprobe activities indicated that the areas of
hydrocarbon-impact in soils were in the vicinity of the UST basin. Results of analysis of ground-
water samples collected during geoprobe activities indicated that the ground water has been
impacted by hydrocarbons at levels above North Carolina standards.
1-2
Conoco Store No. 33047-Comprehensive Site Assessment Repon
Law Engineering Project 56-4533
February 6, 1995
Final
Presently, eight monitoring wells installed by LAW, MW -1 through MW -8 (Figure 2), are located
on site. Wells MW-1 through MW-8 were installed between November 22, 1994 and December I,
1994. These wells were installed to delineate the horizontal and vertical extents of impacted ground
water.
l-3
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Conoco Store No. 33047-Comprehensive Site Assessment Report
Law Engineering Project 56-4533
February 6, 1995
Final
2.0 POTENTIAL RECEPTORS AND MIGRATION PATHWAYS
2.1 WATER WELL SURVEY
The immediate vicinity of the Conoco site located in the North Raleigh Street/East Grand Avenue
area of Rocky Mount, North Carolina is serviced by city water, according to Mr. Paul Blount, the
director of the City of Rocky Mount Water Resources Department. During a telephone
conversation between Mr. Blount and Ms. Kelly McBride of LAW on January 17, 1995, Mr.
Blount stated that this particular area was probably one of the first areas in Rocky Mount to be
serviced with public water, but he was unsure of the date of incorporation.
Mr. Blount also stated that to his knowledge there are no private water-supply wells located within
the city limits. In order to verify this information, a survey of water-supply wells potentially
located within a I ,500-foot radius of the Conoco site was performed on November 30, 1994 by a
LAW representative. No confirmed water-supply wells were noted at the residences or businesses
located within the 1 ,500-foot radius during the survey of the area. The area appears to be primarily
residential with some commercial businesses. The area of the water well survey is shown on
Figure 4.
2.2 MONITORING WELL SURVEY
A survey of off-site monitoring wells within a 1 ,000-foot radius of the Conoco site was performed
November 22, 1994 by a LAW representative. During this survey, nineteen monitoring wells were
identified on properties surrounding the site. The locations of these wells are denoted on Figure 4.
2.3 AREA WATER SUPPLY
According to Mr. Paul Blount with the City of Rocky Mount Water Resources Department, the city
receives water from the Tar River Reservoir or directly from the Tar River. The Tar River
Reservoir is approximately eight miles southwest of the site (Figure 1). The Tar River flows within
4,000 feet of the site at its closest point. The river is located downgradient of the site to the north.
2-1
Conoco Store No. 33047-Comprehensive Site Assessment Report
Law Engineering Project 56-4533
2.4 SUBSURFACE UTILITIES
February 6, 1995
Final
Water mains, catch basins and gas lines observed in the vicinity of the Conoco site are noted on
Figure 5. These locations are approximate and the depth of burial of these lines is not known. The
location of the water main was taken from a portion of a map provided by the City of Rocky Mount
(date unknown). The location of the gas line was verified by Mr. Ike Fowler, Gas Superintendent
of Rocky Mount, in a telephone conversation with Ms. Kelly McBride of LAW on January 26.
1995.
No building basements are located on the properties located immediately adjacent to the site. No
basement is located at the Conoco site.
2-2
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
0
I
Conoco Store No. 33047 -Comprehensive Site Assessment Report
Law Engineering Project 56-4533
3.0 AREA GEOLOGY
February 6, /995
Final
The project site is located in the Atlantic Coastal Plain Physiographic Province. In general, the
sediments of the Coastal Plain consist of interbedded sands, clays, calcareous clays, shell beds,
sandstone, and limestone (LeGrand, 1959). These sediments are generally layered in interfingering
sand beds and clay lenses that gently dip and thicken to the east. In the Rocky Mount area, the
Coastal Plain sediments are about I 00 to 300 feet thick and apparently overlie igneous and
metamorphic basement rocks of the Piedmont Physiographic province. These sediments were
apparently deposited in marine or near-marine environments.
According to the Geologic Map of North Carolina (1985), the site is located in the Yorktown
Formation which consists of fossiliferous clay with varying amounts of fine-grained sand. It is
typically bluish gray with shelly material commonly found in lenses. The Yorktown Formation is
underlain by the Duplin Formation which consists of shelly medium to coarse sand, sandy marl and
limestone. The site is also located near the Tar River where the underlying Cape Fear Formation is
exposed due to erosion of the overlying sediments. This formation consists of yellow gray to bluish
gray, mottled red to yellowish orange graded sands that are locally indurated (NCGS, 1985).
In general, downward movement of ground water within Coastal Plain sediments is obstructed by
the presence of clay layers in Coastal Plain formations and consequently most of the ground-water
recharge migrates laterally toward discharge areas through the surficial aquifer (Heath, 1980).
In the Rocky Mount area, sediments deposited in marine or near-marine environments are about
I 00 to 300 feet thick and overlie igneous and metamorphic basement rocks according to the 1985
Geologic Map of North Carolina. The aquifers of the Rocky Mount area are the surficial and the
Cape Fear aquifers. They are separated by less permeable clay and silt beds (confining units) that
may impede the flow of ground water between the aquifers.
The surficial aquifer in the northern portion of the Coastal Plain consists of Pleistocene deposits that
are comprised of fine to coarse sand and silty sand grading to a clayey sand or sandy clay at depth
(Winner and Coble, 1989). The surficial aquifer is relatively shallow in this area and commonly
extends to depths of 10 to 40 feet. This unit is typically not used for water supply in the area.
3-1
Conoco Store No. 33047-Comprehensive Site Assessment Repo11
Law Engineering Project 56-4533
February 6, 1995
Final
There are two principal water-supply aquifers for the area surrounding the site. The Yorktown
aquifer occurs beneath the surficial aquifer and consists of fine sand, silty sand and clay and is
characterized by pervasive shells and shell beds. This aquifer overlies the Upper Cape Fear aquifer
which consists of alternating beds of clay and sand. The upper Cape Fear confining unit separates
the Yorktown aquifer from the underlying Upper Cape Fear aquifer. The confining unit generally
consists of nearly continuous clay, silty clay and sandy clay beds.
Water levels in wells tapping the surficial aquifer vary seasonally. The surficial aquifer receives
more recharge in the winter than in the summer when much of the water evaporates or is transpired
by plants before it can reach the water table. Therefore, the water table generally is highest in the
winter months and lowest in the summer or early falL
3-2
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
D
I
I
Conoco Store No. 33047-Comprehensive Site Assessment Report
Law Engineering Project 56-4533
4.0 FIELD EXPLORATION
February 6, 1995
Final
The field exploration conducted at the site included performing a soil gas survey, collecting soil and
ground-water samples using a geoprobe, and installing eight monitoring wells.
Collection points for soil/gas samples were chosen by Target; soil/gas samples were collected and
analyzed for hydrocarbons by Target personneL Procedures and results of activities are detailed in
Target's Report of Soil/Gas Survey and Soil and Ground Water Sampling (attached as Appendix
A).
Geoprobe sample collection points were selected by LAW personnel and Conoco based on
preliminary soil/gas survey data and site accessibility. The results of these activities were detailed
in LAW's Preliminary Assessment Repon, dated November 22, 1994.
The boring locations for the eight monitoring wells were selected in the field by LAW personneL
These locations were selected based on existing site conditions, estimated ground-water flow
direction and accessibility of the drill rig. The locations are shown on Figure 2.
Following installation, the wells were located in the field and elevations for the wells were
measured using a level and graduated rod. These elevations· were referenced to an assumed site
datum (top of casing of well MW-7 = 100 feet). The locations and elevations for the borings and
wells should be considered accurate only to the degree indicated by these methods.
4.1 SOIL TEST BORiNGS AND MONlTORlNG WELL INSTALLATION
Eight soil test borings have been performed at the site. Borings MW-1 through MW-8 were drilled
by LAW. The borings were drilled using a truck-mounted drill rig employing continuous flight
hollow-stem augers to advance the boreholes. During drilling, soil sampling and penetration testing
were performed in general accordance with ASTM 0-1586. At regular intervals, soil samples were
obtained with a standard 1.4-inch 1.0., 2-inch 0.0., split-spoon sampler.
4-1
Conoco Store No. 33047-Comprehensive Site Assessment Report
Law Engineering Project 56-4533
February 6, 1995
Final
Representative portions of the soil samples recovered from the borings were scanned with an
organic vapor analyzer (OVA) and classified in the field by LAW personnel. Test boring records
showing the soil descriptions and penetration resistances for each boring are included in Appendix
B. To reduce the potential for cross-contamination between borings, downhole drilling equipment
was steam cleaned prior to drilling each boring.
Type II (shallow) ground-water monitoring wells were installed in boreholes MW-1 through MW-4
and MW-6 through MW-8 to depths ranging from 19 feet to 24 feet. A Type III (deep) monitoring
well was installed in borehole MW-5 to a depth of 53 feet in order to assess the vertical extent of
hydrocarbon impact.
The Type II ground-water monitoring wells (MW-1 through MW-4 and MW-6 through MW-8,
Figure 2) consist of two-inch diameter PVC pipe (Schedule 40 with flush-threaded joints) inserted
into ten-inch diameter augered boreholes. The bottom 15-foot section of each monitoring well is a
manufacntred well screen with 0.010-inch slots. The well screens were set to intercept the
saturated/unsaturated zone interface encountered at the time of drilling. Washed sand backfill was
placed around the outside of the pipe to approximately one-foot above the top of the well screen.
The sand backfill is used to stabilize the fortnation and to help yield a less turbid ground-water
sample. A bentonite seal (minimum one-foot thick) was installed on top of the sand backfill to seal
the monitoring well at the desired level. The borehole was then grouted with a Portland
cement/bentonite mixture to the ground surface. A lockable well cap was installed and a flush
mounted protective steel cover was cemented in-place over each monitoring well.
The Type III monitoring well (MW-5) consists of a ten-inch diameter augered borehole advanced
through the overburden soils to a depth of 45 feet below the ground surface using hollow stem
augers. Four-inch diameter PVC pipe was installed to the tertnination depth of the borehole. The
annular space between the borehole and the four-inch PVC pipe was grouted with a
cement/bentonite grout to near ground-surface and allowed to cure for 24 hours.
After the grout around the four-inch PVC casing had cured, a four-inch diameter borehole was then
advanced to approximately eight feet below the bottom of the four-inch casing using rotary wash
drilling procedures. Two-inch diameter PVC casing with a five-foot (0.010-inch slots)
4-2
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
0
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Conoco Store No. 33047-Comprehensive Site Assessment Report
Law Engineering Project 56-4533
February 6, /995
Final
manufactured screened section at the bottom was installed through the four-inch casing and into the
washed borehole. A sand-pack was constructed around the pipe to several feet above the screen,
followed by an approximately two-foot thick bentonite seal. Above the bentonite. the annular space
was filled with grout to the ground surface. The monitoring well installation records for Type ll
and Type lli wells are provided in Appendix C.
Measuring point and ground-water elevations were determined by measuring the top of each PVC
well casing relative to an on-site datum, measuring the water level in each monitoring well and
computing the reference elevation of the ground water at the time of measurement. A summary of
the ground-water elevation data is included as Table 3.
4-3
Conoco Store No. 33047-Comprehensive Site Assessment Repo11
Law Engineering Project 56-4533
5.0 SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS
February 6, 1995
Final
Eight soil test borings (MW-1 through MW-8, Figure 2) and ten geoprobe borings (GP-1 through
GP-10; Figure 8) have been performed at the site. The eight soil test borings were subsequently
completed as monitoring wells; the geoprobe borings were performed in order to estimate the extent
of the hydrocarbon-impacted soil on the site. -The soil analytical results are summarized in Table 2.
The borings generally encountered residual soils from ground surface. The residual soils
encountered generally consisted of loose to firm sands, firm to very stiff clays and stiff to hard silts.
Partially weathered rock was encountered in boring MW -5 between 39 and 45 feet below ground
surface. Subsurface profiles detailing subsurface conditions are provided as Figures 6 and 7.
Ground-water levels were measured in the monitoring wells on December 16, 1994. The ground-
water measurements are summarized in Table 3. Ground-water levels may fluctuate several feet
with seasonal and rainfall variations and with changes in the water level of adjacent drainage
features. Normally, the highest ground-water levels occur in late winter and spring. The lowest
levels occur in late summer and fall. Ground-water measurements for monitoring wells screened in
the surficial, unconfined aquifer are presented on the ground-water contour map on Figure 12.
The above descriptions provide a general summary of the subsurface conditions encountered. The
test boring records (Appendix A) contain detailed information recorded at each boring and include
our interpretation of the subsurface conditions based on examination of the field samples. The lines
designating interfaces between strata represent approximate boundaries and the transition between
strata may be gradual.
5-1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
B
I
•
I
I
I
I
I
I
Conoco Store No. 33047 · Comprehensive Site Assessment Report
Law Engineering Project 56-4533
February 6, 1995
Final
6.0 SOIL AND GROUND-WATER SAMPLING AND TESTING
The following sections detail soil and ground-water sampling and testing activities performed at the
site.
6.1 SOIL SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS
Soil samples for laboratory analysis were not collected during well installation due to the collection
of numerous soil samples during geoprobe activities performed at the site in August 1994. Soil
samples were obtained from borings GP -1 through GP-10 (Figure 8). The samples were analyzed
for total petroleum hydrocarbons-volatile constituents (EPA 5030/8015M). Selected samples were
also analyzed for total petroleum hydrocarbons semi-volatile constituents (EPA 3550/8015M). The
results were originally submitted as part of LAW's November 22. 1994 report; they are reproduced
in Table 2; the laboratory analytical report and chain-of-custody laboratory records are provided in
Appendix D.
6.2 GROUND-WATER SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS
Following stabilization of the water levels in the monitoring wells. water levels were measured in
each well with an electric water-level indicator to determine depth to the water surface. The
measured water depth was used in conjunction with the total casing depth to determine the height of
the water column and the volume of water standing in each monitoring well.
The monitoring wells were developed by bailing until the water's turbidity was reduced and it was
determined that each monitoring well was functioning properly. Bailing was continued until a
volume of water equal to at least six times the volume of water in the well casing under static
conditions was removed or until all accessible well water was evacuated.
The monitoring wells were sampled on December 16, 1994. A trip blank prepared in the
laboratory was maintained for quality assurance purposes. The ground-water samples and trip
blank were placed on ice and sent via overnight carrier to Law Environmental National
Laboratories in Kennesaw, Georgia for laboratory analysis. The ground-water samples from the
6-1
Conoco Store No. 33047-Comprehensive Site Assessment Report
Law Engineering Project 56-4533
February 6, 1995
Final
December 16, 1994 sampling event were analyzed for benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene and xylenes
(BTEX), methyl-tertiary-butyl ether (MTBE) and isopropyl ether (IPE) by EPA Method 602;
purgeable halocarbons by EPA Method 601; ethylene dibromide (EDB) by EPA Method 504; and
lead by EPA Method 30306. Laboratory test results for the sampling event are summarized in
Tables 4 and 5. The laboratory analytical report and chain-of-custody records are provided in
Appendix E.
6.3 INFLOW PERMEABILITY TESTS
Inflow permeability tests were performed on monitoring wells MW-3 and MW-8 to estimate the
hydraulic conductivity of the formation materials exposed to the screened interval at the monitoring
well location. Hydraulic conductivity is a constant of proportionality relating to the ease with
which a fluid passes through a porous medium. The field procedure to calculate the hydraulic
conductivity is as follows:
• Measure the depth to the ground water;
• remove water from the borehole by bailing; and
• measure the ground-water recovery rate.
The field tests were conducted on December 16, 1994. Results of the field testing are discussed in
Section 7.3; calculations are included in Appendix F.
6-2
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Conoco Store No. 33047-Comprehensive Site Assessment Report
Law Engineering Project 56-4533
7.0 TEST RESULTS AND EVALUATION
The following sections discuss the results of soil and ground-water analyses.
7.1 SOlL ANALYTICAL RESULTS
February 6, /995
Final
Soil samples collected during geoprobe activities in August 1994, were analyzed for TPH-volatile
constituents: selected soil samples were analyzed additionally for TPH semi-volatile constituents, as
discussed in Section 6.!. Levels of hydrocarbons were above North Carolina allowable levels at
one collection point, GP-3. The results of the analyses are summarized in Table 2. These results
were also detailed in our Preliminary Assessment Report, dated November 22. 1994.
7.2 GROUND-WATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Ground-water samples collected during the sampling event on December 16, 1994, were analyzed
as detailed in Section 6.2. The results of the analyses are summarized in Tables 4 and 5. The
results of the analyses indicate that ground water at this site has been impacted by hydrocarbons and
other chlorinated compounds. A total BTEX isopleth map, a benzene isopleth map and an MTBE
isopleth map are provided as Figures 9, 10 and II, respectively.
Concentrations of benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene and xylenes above North Carolina ground-water
standards (as listed in NCAC Title 15A, Subchapter 2L, and provided in Table 4) were detected in
wells MW-1, MW-2, MW-3 and MW-7. Only the ground-water standard for benzene was
exceeded in wells MW-1 and MW-3. MTBE was detected at a concentration above the North
Carolina ground-water standard in wells MW-2, MW-7 and MW-8. Hydrocarbons were non-
detectable or below ground-water standards in wells MW-5, MW-6 and MW-8. Concentrations of
lead exceeded North Carolina ground-water standards in wells MW-3 and MW-8. Chloroform was
detected above the North Carolina standard in well MW-5. Tetrachlorethene was detected above
the North Carolina standard in well MW-2.
7-1
Conoco Store No. 33047-Comprehensive Site Assessment Report
Law Engineering Project 56-4533
7.3 HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY
February 6, 1995
Final
The hydraulic conductivity of the formation materials was estimated at 2 x 10·3 to 2 x 104 em/sec
based on data recorded during field testing on December 16, 1994. The test results are as follows:
MW-3 94.05 -79.05
MW-8 91.98-76.98
NOTE:
silty CLAY /clayey
SAND
clayey silty SAND
· :'~ ~~~,:~Y~r~~~~-~;;-·:_·;~:-~.
.. Conductivi!y.c(K); ·
.: :·.(~in/sec )f.
•• "<• ,_ -
Data were reduced and the hydraulic conductivities computed using techniques described in
Bouwer (1989) and, Bouwer and Rice (1976).
Calculations for hydraulic conductivity are included in Appendix F.
7.4 GROUND-WATER MOVEMENT
Ground-water movement is often related to topography, lithology, elevation of recharge and
discharge areas and man-made influences. Referenced ground-water elevations were determined by
measuring the top of the monitoring well casing relative to a nearby, on-site datum elevation (top of
casing of well MW-7 = 100 feet), measuring the water level in the monitoring well, and computing
the reference elevation of the ground water at the time of measurement.
Directions of ground-water flow were interpolated between monitoring wells by comparing the
ground-water elevations at those locations considering the factors listed above. Ground-water levels
typically fluctuate with seasonal and rainfall variations.
7-2
I
I
I
I
I I
I
I
I
I,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
D
I
I
I
Conoco Store No. 33047-Comprehensive Site Assessment Reporl
Law Engineering Project 56-4533
February 6, 1995
Final
Ground-water elevation data for the December 16, 1994 sampling event were plotted and a ground-
water contour map of the surficial aquifer was prepared (see Figure 12). The generalized direction
of the ground-water flow at the site is to the northwest as shown on Figure 12. The data points
used to prepare the ground-water contour map (ground-water elevations in site monitoring wells)
are summarized in Table 3.
Hydraulic gradients were determined by dividing the difference in ground-water elevation at two
locations by the horizontal distance between the two locations. The average hydraulic gradient at
the site was computed to be approximately 0.0605 foot/foot.
In addition to hydraulic gradients (i), the rates of ground-water movement (v) are a function of
hydraulic conductivity (k) and effective porosity (ne), as indicated by the equation v=ki/ne. The
effective porosity can be expected to be approximately 20 to 30 percent for the silty clays and
clayey sands at this site. Based on those parameters, the average lateral ground-water movement in
the silts at the site can be expected to be between approximately 42 to 64 feet per year. The rate of
migration of the dissolved organic constituent(s), however, may be substantially slower than ground
water itself, due to retardation and intrinsic aerobic biodegradation. Hydraulic calculations are
provided in Appendix F.
7-3
Conoco Store No. 33047-Comprehensive Site Assessment Report
Law Engineering Project 56-4533
February 6, 1995
Final
8.0 SUMMARY OF COMPREHENSIVE SITE ASSESSMENT ACTIVITIES
8.1 SOIL
Results of the assessment activities performed to date indicate that soils at the site have been
impacted by hydrocarbons at levels above North Carolina Standards; however, the area of impact
appears to be limited to the vicinity of the former kerosene UST.
8.2 GROUND WATER
Based on the results of the assessment activities performed to date, it appears that ground water
at the site has been impacted by hydrocarbons at levels above North Carolina allowable levels.
The highest concentrations of compounds were detected in wells MW-2 and MW-7. The plume
of impacted ground water appears to be sufficiently defined in the horizontal direction to the
northeast, east, southwest and south. The plume of impacted ground water appears to be defined
in the vertical direction.
8-1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Conoco Store No. 33047-Comprehensive Site Assessment Report
Law Engineering Project 56-4533
9.0 QUALIFICATION OF REPORT
February 6, 1995
Final
The activities and evaluative approaches used in this report are consistent with those normally
employed in hydrogeological assessment and remediation projects of this type. Our evaluation of
site conditions has been based on our understanding of the site, project information provided to us
and data obtained in our exploration. The general subsurface conditions utilized in our evaluation
have been based on interpolation of subsurface data between borings.
9-1
Conoco Store No. 33047-Comprehensive Site Assessment Report
Law Engineering Project 56-4533
10.0 REFERENCES
February 6, 1995
Final
Bouwer, H. and R.C. Rice, 1976, "A Slug Test for Determining Hydraulic Conductivity of
Unconfined Aquifers with Completely or Partially Penetrating Wells," Water Resources
Research, Vol. 12, No. 3, pp. 423-428.
Bouwer, H., 1989, "The Bouwer & Rice Slug Test-An Update," Groundwater, Vol. 27, No.3,
pp. 304-309.
Fetter. C.W., Jr., 1980, Applied Hydrogeology, Charles Merrill Publishing Company, Columbus,
Ohio.
Freeze, R.A., and Cherry, J.A., 1979, Groundwater, Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, New
Jersey.
10-1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Conoco Store No. 33047 ~ Comprehensive Site Assessment Report
Law Engineering Project 56-4533
TABLES
February 6, 1995
Final
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
u
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Conoco Store No. 33047-Comprehensive Site Assessment Report
Law Engineen'ng Project 56-4533
TABLE 1
AREA PROPERTY OWNERS
Map Owner's Property
Number Name Location**
3860.17 George F. Rose A
3860.17 Alice Battle B
3860.17 Alice Battle c
3860.17 Fenners Warehouse, Inc. D
First City Bank
3860.17 Fenners Warehouse Inc. E
3860.17 Peter P. Williams F
3860.17 L.W. Locke G
3860.17 Alcoholic Beverage H
Control Board
3860.17 James P. Neville, Jr.
3860.17 Marvin H. Proctor J
3860.17 Chesley H. Proctor K
February 6, 1995
Final
Street Address
of Property
34 through 38 Freeman Street
1100 North Raleigh Street
Ill 0 North Raleigh Street
1200 North Raleigh Street
1210 North Raleigh Street
address not available
1217 North Raleigh Street
Raleigh Street and H wy. 64
1115 North Raleigh Street
1111 North Raleigh Street
1101 North Raleigh Street
Prepared/Date: .....~..:.!6::;;,-:.M:....::...____::J.--!--/'..:./.,;9,5' ____ _
Checked/Date: -"-'ful"-'-'-r--...::.:J--'-/-"I£'-'/'-'9-=-s ___ _
Notes:
I) Property information obtained from Edgecombe County Tax Office.
2) Mailing addresses of property owners were not available.
**See Figure 3 for corresponding property locations
Conoco Store No. 33047-Comprehensive Site Assessment Report February 6, 1995 I
Law Engineering Project 56-4533 Final I
TABLE 2 I
SOIL ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Sample TPH TPH I
Sample Depth Date Volatiles Semi-Volatiles+ !54
Location (feet. bgs) Sampled (5030/8015M) (3550/8015M) I
GP-1 4-5 08/07/94 ND NA I
GP-1 9-10 08/07/94 ND NA
GP-2 4-5 08/07/94 ND NA I
GP-2 9-10 08/07/94 ND NA I
GP-3 4-5 08/07/94 ND 82(d) I
GP-3 9-10 08/07/94 ND ND
GP-4 4-5 08/06/94 ND NA I
GP-4 9-10 08/06/94 ND NA I
GP-5 4-5 08/06/94 ND 10(d) I
GP-5 9-10 08/06/94 ND ND
GP-6 4-5 08/06/94 ND NA I
GP-6 9-10 08/06/94 ND NA I
GP-7 4-5 08/06/94 ND NA I
GP-7 9-10 08/06/94 ND NA
GP-8 4-5 08/06/94 ND NA I
GP-8 9-10 08/06/94 ND NA I
GP-9 4-5 08/06/94 ND NA I
GP-9 9-10 08/06/94 ND NA I Page 1 of 2
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
n
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Conoco Store No. 33047-Comprehensive Site Assessment Report
· Law Engineering Project 56-4533
TABLE 2
SOIL ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Sample TPH
Sample Depth Date Volatiles
Location (feet, bgs) Sampled (5030/80l5M)
GP-10 4-5 08/06/94 NO
GP-10 9-10 08/06/94 NO
February 6, 1995
Final
TPH
Semi-Volatiles+ 154
(3550/80l5M)
NA
NA
Prepared/Date: --'-'K'::'Ji-'-M....:..___.:Z-:J./--'1...1./_,q7:;-__ _
Checked/Date: _""ii.J.clm.Ll..l.[ _ _c_J-.:..:1 /f"--'-/9'--?'--__
NOTES:
l. NO = Not Detected
2. Concentrations reported in milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg).
3. NCDEHNR Action Levels for soil are 10 mg/kg for volatiles and
40 mg/kg for semi-volatiles.
4) (d) = Tentatively identified as diesel.
5) TPH = Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons
6) bgs = below ground surface
Page 2 of2
Conoco Store No. 33047-Comprehensive Site Assessment Report
Law Engineering Project 56-4533
TABLE3
GROUND-WATER ELEVATION DATA
Elevation of Depth to
Well Top of Pipe Ground Water
Number (feet) (feet)
MW-1 92.72 7.80
MW-2 100.74 16.58
MW-3 102.64 14.23
MW-4 102.77 14.56
MW-5 102.86 4.39
MW-6 99.81 11.83
MW-7 100.00 14.81
MW-8 97.66 13.22
February 6, 1995
Final
Ground-Water
Elevation
(feet)
84.92
84.16
88.41
88.21
98.47
87.98
85.19
84.44
Prepared/Date:,<)"~ z. f, I q r
Checked/Date: "mlr ;l-/y /9<J
NOTES:
1) Ground-water elevation data collected on December 16, 1994.
2) Elevations referenced to an assumed site datum (top of casing MW-7 = 100 feet).
3) MW -5 is a deep, Type Ill well.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
g
I
D
I
I
I
I
I
Conoco Store No. 33047-Comprehensive Site Assessment Report
Law Engineen·ng Project 56-4533
TABLE 4
February 6, 1995
Final
GROUND-WATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS-TOTAL BTEX AND MTBE
Well Benzene Toluene Ethylbenzene Xylenes
Number (ug/1) (ug/1) (ug/1) (ug/1)
MW-1 9.6 ND ND 23
MW-2 3,900 5,700 780 3,200
MW-3 7.2 1.3 ND ND
MW-4 NS NS NS NS
MW-5 ND 1.3 NO ND
MW-6 NO 2.3 1.9 13
MW-7 8,500 10,000 1,300 5,000
MW-8 ND NO NO 27
Trip Blank NO 2.2 NO NO
NCGWS 1000 29 530
Notes:
I) Samples collected for analysis on December 16, 1994.
2) MTBE = methyl-tertiary-butyl ether.
3) NO = Not Detected
4) NS = Not sampled due to heavy product sheen
TotalBTEX MTBE
(ug/1) (ug/1)
32.6 67
13,580 15,000
8.5 7.4
NS NS
1.3 NO
17.2 35
24,800 34,000
27 2,200
2.2 NO
200
Prepared/Date: --'lc..::V.,__M,;__..,z..~..../-f'l/,_9 J:...~
Checked/Date: ___,'fl'lJ"'-'-'r---"r-'-1 v,._._/ 9...,!5'_
5) NCGWS = North Carolina Ground-Water Standards, NCAC Title 15, Subchapter 2L,
Section . 0202(g).
Conoco Store No. 33047-Comprehensive Site Assessment Report
Law Engineering Project 56-4533
TABLE 5
GROUND-WATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS
ADDITIONAL DETECTED CONSTITUENTS
Well IPE EDB Chloroform Tetrachloroethene
Number (ug/1) (ug/l) (ug/1) (ug/1)
MW-1 ND ND ND ND
MW-2 600 ND ND 3. l
MW-3 ND ND ND ND
MW-4 NS NS NS NS
MW-S ND ND 49 ND
MW-6 9.6 ND ND ND
MW-7 760 ND ND ND
MW-8 38 ND ND ND
Trip Blank ND ND ND ND
NCGWS NL 4.0 X l0-4 0.19 0.70
February 6, 1995
Final
Lead
(mg/1)
ND
ND
0.076
NS
ND
ND
ND
0.21
NA
O.OlS
Prepared/Date: _,_t<-"":J'-'""'-.:..::.___:...Z-.;..(..:.,I..J./...J1""S ____ _
Checked/Date: ___ ']m-"'"-,_,_1_')-"-'-'/yw/'-'q-"'1) ____ _
Notes:
1) Samples collected for anlaysis on December 16, 1994.
2) NS = Not Sampled, due to heavy product sheen
3) ND = Not Detected; NA = Not Analyzed
4) NCGWS = North Carolina Ground-Water Standards, NCAC Title !SA, Subchapter 2L.
S) NL = No Standard Listed (NCAC Title !SA, Subchapter 2L Section .0202(g)) where no
standard is established, standard is taken as the laboratory detection limit.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
•
0
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
·----·-------
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Conoco Store No. 33047 ~ Comprehensive Site Assessment Report
Law Engineering Project 56-4533
FIGURES
February 6, 1995
Final
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
n
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
/
/
/
\
\
\
\
\
\ A
\
\ MW-
i ~ ~ -'< REF., SlltPLAN BY CONOCO. SHELT o~. 33047. DAlED ID-29-92.
·-.. ·-,,_
·--...., .
PUMP WITH
LEAKY VALVE
-~ \ \\
\\ \
) I ~\ I \ \.
MWf.-6 /~ I I I / -~-I
\
\
\
I
I /
-·~-
~----------,
1 I L __________ l
i/~-~/1
f " L .. c::>J
(1) =
0
•
EXPLANATION
PROPERTY LINE
APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF
UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANKS
AREAS WITH CONCRETE COVER
PUMP ISLAND (NUMBER)
CEDAR PRIVACY FENCE
TYPE II MONITORING WIELL
TYPE Ill MONITORING WIELL
MONITORING WIELL INSTALLED BY OTHERS
APPROXIMATE LOCATION
OF FREE PRODUCT COLLECTION WIELL
SUBSURFACE CROSS-SECTION
(REFER TO FIGURES 6 AND 7)
30 0 30
Ia ~~'!'AND EN~RONWENTAL ~=
QIARLOTTE. NORlH CAROliNA
SITE PLAN
CONOCO STORE NO. 33047
1122 NORTH RALEIGH ST. -ROCKY MOUNT, N.C.
OlEO< EO
56-4533 FIGURE 2
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
\
' \
I .
. \
\
\
/
_.--"
/
/
/
/
··-
A
EXPLANATION
OWNER DESIGN A nON PROPERTYTO TABLE 1) (REFER
200 100 0 200
-------~~~~~~~ME~m~•mn~----=----APPROXIIIATE /
LAW \IIR<»>IIENTAl SERVICES
ENGINEERING ANON~\H CAROUNA CHAALOTlE.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
"' Q
I ~ ,;;
"' ~
I "' N ' 5
"' Q
I 8 N / "' "' "' .. "' REF.: "' / I -';
)
/~
PROPERTY IAAPS OF EDGECOI.tBE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA,
MAP N 1 7 . A 1
I --~~~DI4S
_.. -'"I --. i-..._ """"..-I \· .._ ,.. -·------·-.\ ......... / \". ....... ....... \~:-, ',
\ .:-, .......
'.;·, '
1000' RADIUS
···<··,
\\ \_ ·.l _..--------..... .....
-----·
' ' ' ' ' ' \
\
\
I
I
I
I
I
I
I I
-, , LJ
·. /t.?/
)(1)1
I
I
I ,-----J
I
I
·~'-. /t;Y ·, ___ I
1/
I
\.I
I
'1.
1\ I
I
I
EXPLANATION
0 APPROXIMATE LOCATIONS OF MONITORING WELLS
NOTE:
1) NO AREA WATER SUPPLY WELLS NOTED WITHIN
1500' RADIUS OF SITE.
0
APPROXIIlATE SCALE IN FEET
~ ~~AND EN"'RONIIENTAl SER"'CES
CHARLOTTE, NORni CAROUNA
AREA WATER SUPPLY WELL I
OFF SITE IIONITORING WELL LOCATION IIAP
CONOCO STORE NO. 33047
1122 NOR':"H RALEIGH ST. -ROCKY MOUNT, N.C.
CHEO<EO
56-4533 FlGURE 4
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~
/
/
\
\
\
\
\
\
REF.: SITEPLAN BY CONOCO. SHEET NO. 33047. DATED lG-29-92.
STORM WATER
CATCH BASIN
" " ) /~
/ / /0
./ MW-8
./
PUMP WITH
LEAKY VALVE
\
\ /~ i
/ I )
' I .f ----f-ro;; WATER ~~~"!£~
"i CAT ~·.-
\ . -.:...-;--
-·~-
~-----------
' ~----------1
r ........ /· / ... / ./ ... " ... /1 r· // / ... / .. /I
( 1) =
0
•
EXPLANATION
PROPERTY LINE
APPROXIMATE LOCA nON OF
UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANKS
AREAS WITH CONCRETE COVER
PUMP ISLAND (NUMBER)
CEDAR PRIVACY FENCE
TYPE II MONITORING WELL
TYPE Ill MONITORING WELL
MONITORING WELL INSTALLED BY OTHERS
APPROXIMATE LOCA nON
OF FREE PRODUCT COLLECnON WELL
30 0
APPROXIIIATI! SCAlE IN l'EET
30
l. ~~'!'AND EN~ONMENTAL ~CES
OiARLOTTE, NORTH CAROUNA
SUBSURFACE UTILITIES MAP
CONOCO STORE NO. 33047
1122 NORTH RAlEIGH ST. -ROCKY MOUNT, N.C.
PREPAREIIv BY ~
JOB NO. 56-4533 nGURE
-------
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~,
~ ~ "'
I I I 1
l i i l
I I '
~ ::l ., •
100
90
;:::-w w .... ~
z 0
F <( > 80 w --' w
w f-
<( :::; x 0 "' a. "-70 <(
60
50
A MW-5 MW-4 ----------------MW-2 ___ ---------
... .. . -=-
BT
BT
00
00
00 00
00
00
00 oo oo
00 00
BT
PROFILES
~..-...--GROUND-
WATER
ELEVATION
EXPLANATION
SCREENED ---t~Y:
INTERVAL
BT BORING TERM INA TED
--------GROUND-SURFACE
--- ---GROUND-WATER ELEVATION
A'
-----------___ MW-6
-
BT
SOIL SYMBOLS
FILL SANDY CLAY
SAND CLAYEY SAND
CLAY SILTY CLAY
SILT • ASPHALT
SANDY SILT CLAYEY SILT
100
90
80
70
60
50
;:::-w w .... ~
z 0
F <( > w --' w
w f-
<(
:::; x 0 "' a. "-<(
10
APPROXIMATE
SCALE
(FEET)
20
J& ~~~AND EN~~~TAL SER~CES
OiARLOTlE, NORlH CAROUNA
CROSS·SECTION A·A'
CONOCO STORE NO. 33047
1122 NORTH RALEIGH ST. -ROCKY MOUNT. N.C.
PREPARED,, ,
BY l\ DAlE }\[! l% OiEa<EO Cte.-
~ ~-~ 6 ~~----------------------------------------------------------------------------------~----~------~----------~
PARTIALLY WEATHERED ROCK SILTY SAND JOB NO. FIGURE
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I "' ,
" .., .. I ~
"' ~ .. N ' I i5
"\ "' "' 0 « I ;l-.., ..,
"' .. ;
I .,
B
100
90
~ w w "-~
z 0 F < > w 80 --' w
I!! < "' x 0 0:: Q.
Q. < 70
60
50
--------------~~5
EXPLANATION
PROFILES
M,_,___ GROUND-
WATER
ELEVATION
SCREENED --4-"11
INTERVAL
---
BT BORING TERMINATED
--------GROUND-SURFACE
---
--- ---GROUND-WATER ELEVATION
------___ MW-7
BT
SOIL SYMBOLS
FILL
SAND
CLAY
SILT •
SANDY SILT
SILTY SAND
------
SANDY CLAY
CLAYEY SAND
SILTY CLAY
ASPHALT
CLAYEY SILT
PARTIALLY
WEATHERED ROCK
B'
---MW-8
-
BT
PREP BY
100
90
80
70
60
50
~ >--w w ~
z 0 F < > w --' w
w >--< "' x 0
0::
Q. Q. <
10
APPROXIMATE
SCALE
(FEET)
20
..£,~~AND EN'IIR<»>IIENTAL SERVICES
CHARlOTTE. NORTH CAROLINA
CROSS·SECTION B·B'
CONOCO STORE NO. 33047
1122 NORTH RALEIGH ST. -ROCKY MOUNT, N.C.
CHECKED ac....
56-4533 FIGUR£
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~ "' ~ ~ :8
\
\
/
/
\
\
0
\ GP-2 \ \/)
\ \
\ 0 \JAPPROX. EXTENT , MW-70 GP-8 \
MW-2 OF FORMER ~/';:--~ 0 · /"'
\ m~~~~~JANK '. / /'~·</?/"'>---. GP-9 \ \ ~· ' --~ jF>////&7 ~//--o \,\ · .. ,
.,.-\ I Q # 33047. / // 0 / // //!)</ / • )';--·~
', ~fu~tti~~--\-\-I\ '-t:;'::.·::;::·<<~:.· .. ::.:·;:·.~;:~; ) > \\\ .. /. / / ./ ./ / / / / .1 . -s.,.. !// ..... /.---//,.,,, I . ~---\.,) ,\ ,. \ \ .: ... ... / ::."'\ .-,· / / .... / / '1 '
1 n1i ~R~. . MW-4 '.:.....(/ /;::; ,/·, ~ //. • // 0' \~1 r .~ I ·, 0 OGP-5 -<..:···· .· / // / / / /.. M.W'-6 . \.---" , . / v"\ 0MW-5 / ' // / .;;yjj /'1 U/
/I//.·. , /'/ ____ 1 <::_·_'j-ij•/·//• GP-10_ .. / _/
\
\//r _./ //--·' /1 1 GP 7 • . foJ/J ( , 1/ / /..--/ • I I -""-...( •]
y/·· /.,_,/"'..2: .. / \ \ ~ ,/ I \ \ \ -y-
\ \LOCATION OF N~ ~ I i
\ \KEROSENE UST
1
---~~::y ~~VE ,_-----j-
\ ~ . --.,'---
\ \·. G GPP--6600 ~ ·.J sr{'"00£1:
\ \ ~M~ ~-_j t t'-Ci
. rP-4.. \~ "R~L£\Gt\
__.. ~o"Rrtt\
-;; REF.: SllEPI.AN BY CONOCO. SHEET NO. 33047, DAlEO lD-29-92.
\
)
-·~-
,----------~
I I !_ __________ I
( 1)
c:::::J
0
•
0
GP-1
EXPLANATION
PROPERTY LINE
APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF
UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANKS
AREAS v.lTH CONCRETE COVER
PUMP ISLAND (NUMBER)
CEDAR PRIVACY FENCE
TYPE II MONITORING WELL
TYPE Ill MONITORING WELL
MONITORING WELL INSTALLED BY OTHERS
APPROXIMATE LOCATION
OF FREE PRODUCT COLLIECTION WELL
APPROXIMATE LOCATION AND NUMBER
OF GEOPROBE BORING/WELL
JO 0 JO
£ ~~'!AND EN"RONIIENTAL SER"CES
OiARLOT!E. NORTH CAROLINA
GEOPROBE COLLECTION POINTS
CONOCO STORE NO. 33047
1122 NORTH RALEIGH ST. -ROCKY MOUNT, N.C.
PRa'ARED BY I
JOB NO. 56-4533 8
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
g
0
~ ~ ~ ... :g
\
\
/
/
\
\
\
\
~ REF.: SI'TEPLAN BY CONOCO. SHEET NO. 33047, DATED 1Q-29-92.
/
/
!
- . .!g--
~-----------
' I ~----------:
( 1) =
0
•
(8.5)
so------
EXPLANATION
PROPERTY LINE
APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF
UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANKS
AREAS WITH CONCRETE COVER
PUMP ISLAND (NUMBER)
CEDAR PRIVACY FENCE
TYPE II MONITORING WELL
TYPE Ill MONITORING WELL
MONITORING WELL INSTALLED BY OTHERS
APPROXIMATE LOCATION
OF FREE PRODUCT COLLECTION WELL
TOTAL BTEX CONCENTRATION (ug/1, 12/16/94)
TOTAL BTEX ISOPLETH (ug/1, 12/16/94)
(DASHED WHERE INFERRED)
PREP BY
30 0 30
~~!,'!AND EN"'RONWENTAL SER"'CES
O<ARLOTlE. NORTH CAROliNA
TOTAL BTEX ISOPLETH MAP
CONOCO STORE NO. 33047
1122 NORTH RALEIGH ST. -ROCKY MOUNT, N.C.
0-IEO<ED
56-4533 FIGURE 9
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
\
\
/
/
\
\
\
\
\ (3:0)
4000~W­
~
\
KEROSENE
\ DISPENSER---1 ----I.)Si I . I £.J>.I \ v·~· "'1 '"""'-----~W-4 \,.--%} / 0~~-5
\
I -\/\--I / /'v<.-::::: / /l1 \ ~~/1---7 / I I '///. \ \
\
I I
\LOCATION OF NEW)., ~
\ \KEROSENE UST_./-I---
\
400
./
I
!
1 ~
I
I I __ ....---J-
. \
-·~-
~----------,
I I ._ __________ !
(1) =
0
•
(3900)
EXPLANATION
PROPERTY LINE
APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF
UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANKS
AREAS WITH CONCRETE COVER
PUMP ISLAND {NUMBER)
CEDAR PRIVACY FENCE
;TYPE II MONITORING WELL
TYPE 111 MONITORING WELL
MONITORING WELL INSTALLED BY OTHERS
APPROXIMATE LOCATION
OF FREE PRODUCT COLLECTION WELL
BENZENE CONCENTIRATION (ug/1, 12/16/94)
\
4000--------BENZENE ISOPLETH {ug/1, 12/16/94)
\
\
1
/
_.//···-'
0 JO
APPROXIIIATB SCALE IN I'EET
Ia ~~'Y AND EN~~WENTAL SER~CES
OiARLOTTE. NORlH CAROI.JNA
BENZENE ISOPLETH MAP
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
/
\
\
\
\
\
\
I'
'
~
~ • :g
/
\
10,00 ~---
(15,000)
0
MW-2
~ REF.: SITEPLAN BY CONOCO, SHEET NO. 33047, OAl[ll lQ-29-92.
/ r
/
(2200)
/0
/. MW-8 / __ ./
EXPLANATION
--· ~ --PROPERTY LINE
/
NOlES:
\
j
./
)
.
,----------,
I I !.._ __________ ,
( 1)
c=::J
0
•
(8.5)
100------
1) GROUND-WAlER SAMPLES COLLECTED FOR
ANALYSIS ON DECEMBER 16, 1994.
2) CONTOUR INlERVAL AS SHOWN.
3) CONCENTRATIONS GIVEN IN ( ug/1)
4) MONITORING WELL MW-4 WAS NOT SAMPLED
DUE TO A HEAVY PRODUCT SHEEN.
5) DEEP TYPE Ill WELL MW-5 NOT
USED IN CONTOURING.
APPROXIMA lE LOCATION OF
UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANKS
AREAS WITH CONCRElE COVER
PUMP ISLAND (NUMBER)
CEDAR PRIVACY FENCE
TYPE II MONITORING WELL
TYPE Ill MONITORING WELL
MONITORING WELL INSTALLED BY OTHERS
APPROXIMA lE LOCATION
OF FREE PRODUCT COLLECTION WELL
MTBE CONCENTRATION (ug/1, 12/16/94)
MTBE ISOPLETH (ug/1, 12/16/94)
(DASHED WHERE INi'ERRED)
30 0 30
~ ~~'Y AND EN~MENTAL SER~CB
OiARLOTlE. NOR1H CAROUNA
PREP
BY
IITBE ISOPLETH IIAP
CONOCO STORE NO. 33047
1122 NORTH RALEIGH ST. -ROCKY YOUNT, N.C.
OiEO<ED
56-4533 F1GURE 11
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
\
\
/
/
\
\
\
\
--~-
1 -----------
I !_ __________ I
1>;<<~1
(1)
=::::J
0
EXPLANATION
PROPERTY LINE
APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF
UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANKS
AREAS WllH CONCRETE COVER
PUMP ISLAND (NUMBER)
CEDAR PRIVACY FENCE
TYPE II MONITORING WELL
TYPE Ill MONITORING WELL
MONITORING WELL INSTALLED BY OlHERS
\
\
~
(84.16)
0
MW-2 . 8.5 ~~:Z~t;;~~~'i:?~r-j\~'~\\.
. 86
•
\
APPROXIMATE LOCATION
OF FREE PRODUCT COLLECTION WELL
GENERALIZED GROUND-WATER
FLOW DIRECTION
~ ! ~ :l!
85
\(88.41)
\ 0MW-3
88 \ -1---. \
_;_----'
~ REf., SllEPLAN BY Cotmco. SHEET NO. 33047, DAlEO lQ-29-92.
PUMP WllH
LEAKY VALVE
(87.98)
0' w:...6 r~:t88
// I
I I
87
'\
\
/
/
(85.21) GROUND-WATER ELEVATION (FT., 12/16/94)
85-------. GROUND-WATER CONTOUR (FT., 12/16/94)
JO 0 JO
APPROXIIIATB SCALE IN t'E£1'
NOTES: I. ~~'Y AND EN~~WENTAL ~=
OiARLOTlE. NORTH CAROliNA 1) GROUND-WATER MEASUREMENTS
MADE IN WELLS ON DECEMBER 16, 1994. ·J--------------------i
2) DEEP TYPE Ill WELL, MW-5, NOT
USED IN CONTOURING.
3) CONTOUR INTERVAL = 1.0 FT.
4) GROUND-WATER ELEVATIONS REFERENCED
TO AN ASSUMED SITE DATUM (TOP OF
CASING MW-7 = 100.00 FT.)
GROUND·WATER CONTOUR MAP
CONOCO STORE NO. 33047
1122 NORTH RALEIGH ST. -ROCKY MOUNT, N.C.
a-tEO< ED
56-4533 FlGUR£ 12
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Conoco Store No. 33047-Comprehensive Site Assessment Report
Law Engineering Project 56-4533
APPENDIX A
TARGET SOIL GAS SURVEY REPORT-AUGUST 1994
February 6, 1995
Final
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
:: 't ·,~!. :., L-
\ -··
SOIL GAS SURVEY &
SOIL & GROUNDWATER SAMPLING
CONOCO STORE #33047
ROCKY MOUNT, NORTH CAROLINA
PREPARED FOR
LAW ENVIRONMENTAL
2801 YORKMONT ROAD, SUITE 300
CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA 28208
PREPARED BY
'· -
TARGET ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
9180 RUMSEY ROAD
COLUMBIA, MARYLAND 21045
[phone]
AUGUST 1994
TABLE OF CONTENTS
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Introduction
Sample Collection and Analysis
Quality Assurance/Quality Control (QA/QC) Evaluation
Results
Summary
Figure I. Sample Locations
Figure 2. Total FID Volatiles
FIGURES
TABLES
Table I. Analyte Concentrations via GC/FID
APPENDICES
APPENDIX A -Field Procedures
APPENDIX B -Laboratory Procedures
APPENDIX C -Delectability & Terminology
tt
l
2
3
4
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
From July 14 to August 6, 1994, TARGET Environmental Se1vices, Inc. (TARGE1)
conducted a soil gas survev and subsequent soil and groundwater sampling at the Conoco Slol'e
#33047 on Raleigh Street in Rocky Mount, North Carolina. A total of 23 soil gas samples were
manually collected from a depth of 4 feet. Direct-push, multiple-depth soil and groundwater
sample collection was then guided by the results of the soil gas data and performed using a van-
mounted hydraulic probe. The samples were analyzed on a gas chromatograph equipped with
a flame ionization detector (GC/FID) for petroleum hydrocarbons. The objective of the survey
was to determine the identity and concentrations of volatile petroleum hydrocarbons within the
subsurface.
Mapped analysis results indicate that there are high concentrations of petroleum
hydrocarbons east of the pump islands and moderately low concentrations extending northwest
from this location for 75 feet along East Grand Avenue. Moderate concentrations of petroleum
hydrocarbons were also observed on the east side of the gasoline UST area with moderately low
concentrations extending southeast toward North Raleigh Street. In the same areas, individual
analyte concentrations were observed at proportions of Total FlO Volatiles concentrations which
suggest gasoline contamination.
tl
TARGET Project MLC4
Introduction
Law En vi ron mental ( L~w) contracted TARGET Envinmmental Setvices, Inc. (TARGET) to
perform a soil gas survev and subsequent soil and groundwater sampling at the Conoco Stol'e
#3304 7 on Raleigh Street in Rocky Mount, North Carolina. The site is an operating gas station
and convenience store with associated gasoline and kerosene underground storage tank (UST)
systems. The objective of the survey was to determine the identity and concentrations of volatile
petroleum hydrocarbons within the subsurface.
The soil gas survey was designed by TARGET upon arrival to cover the site wtth regard to
potential sources of petroleum hydrocarbons within the subsurface. Samples were to be collected
at a depth of 4 feet. Subsequent soil and groundwater sampling locations and depths were
determined by LAW using soil gas analysis results. The field phase of the survey and follow-up
sampling was conducted from July 14 to August 6, 1994.
Sample Collection and Analvsis
Soil gas samples were collected at a total of 23 locations at the site, as shown in Figure I.
These soil gas samples were collected at the proposed depth of 4 feet. After soil gas sample
analysis, subsequent sampling included 30 soil samples and 12 groundwater samples. A detailed
explanation of the sampling procedures is provided in Appendix A.
All of the samples collected during the field phase of the survey were analyzed according
to EPA Method 8020 (modified) on a gas chromatograph equipped with a flame ionization
detector (GC/FID), and using direct injection. Analytes selected for standardization were:
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-'-"""----. -----~--~-------
I
I
I
I
I
benzene
toluene
ethyl benzene
meta-and para-xylene
ortho-xylene
TARGET Project HLC4
These compounds were chosen because of their utility in evaluating the presence of petroleum
I products such as fuels, lubricating oils, and non-halogenated solvents. An explanation of the
laboratory procedures is provided in Appendix B.
I The tabulated results of the laboratory analysis of the soil gas samples are reported in
I micrograms per liter (11g/l) in Table I. Although "micrograms per liter" is equivalent to "parts
I
per billion (v/v)" in water analyses, they are not equivalent in gas analyses, due to the difference
in the mass of equal volumes of water and gas matrices. The xylenes concentrations reported
I' in the data table are the sum of the m-and p-xylene and the o-xylene concentrations for each
I sample.
Soil and groundwater samples were submitted to Law on site for independent laboratory
I analysis.
I Qualitv Assurance/Qualitv Control (QA/Qq Evaluation
I Soil Gas Field QA/QC Samples
I Field control samples were collected at the beginning and end of each day's field activities
and after every twentieth soil gas sample. These QA/QC samples were obtained by filtering
I ambient air through a dust and organic vapor filter cartridge and encapsulating as described in
I the "Field Procedures" in Appendix A. The laboratory results are reported in Table I.
Concentrations of all analytes were below the reporting limit in all field control samples.
I
I 2
TARGET Project MLC4
Soil :md Groundwate•· Field QA/QC Samples
Field control samples were collected at the beginning and end of each day's field activities.
These QA/QC samples were obtained by rinsing distilled water through the decontaminated bailer
or sampling tube into sample vials. These samples were submitted along with the others as
described in the "Field Procedures" in Appendix A.
Laborato1v QA/QC Samples
To document analytical repeatability, a duplicate analysis was performed on every tenth field
sample. A laboratory blank of nitrogen gas was also analyzed after the tenth field sample. The
results of these analyses are reported in Table I. The duplicate analyses were within acceptable
limits. Concentrations of all analytes were below the reporting limit in all laboratory blanks.
Results
In order to provide graphic presentation of the results, Total FID Volatiles concentrations in
Table I have been mapped and contoured to produce Figure 2. Dashed contours are used where
patterns are extrapolated into areas of less complete data, or as auxiliary contours. Map sample
points with no data shown indicate that the analyte concentrations in the sample were below the
reporting limit. An explanation of the terminology used in this report is provided in Appendix
C.
Total FID Volatiles (Figure 2) were observed at a high concentration in Sample 4-11, which
was collected east of the pump islands. Moderately low concentrations were observed for 75 feet
northwest of Sample 4-11 along East Grand Avenue. Moderate Total FID Volatiles
concentrations were sampled on the east side of the gasoline UST area, and moderately low
concentrations extending southeast of this area towards North Raleigh Street were also observed.
3
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-.-----.~-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
TARGET Project MLC4
In the same areas, individual analyte concentrations were observed at proportions of Total FID
Volatiles concentrations which suggest gasoline contamination.
Sun1marv
•
•
•
Mapped analysis results indicate that there are high concentrations of petroleum
hydrocarbons east of the pump islands and moderately low concentrations extending
northwest from this location for 75 feet along East Grand Avenue.
Moderate concentrations of petroleum hydrocarbons were also observed on the east side of
the gasoline UST area with moderately low concentrations extending southeast toward North
Raleigh Street.
In the same areas, individual analyte concentrations were observed at proportions of Total
!'10 Volatiles concentrations which suggest gasoline contamination.
4
• 4--21
\
• 4--22
PROPERlY
UNE
• 4--20
APPROXII.IA 1E
EXlENT Of FORI.IER
KEROSENE TANK
EXCAVATION
• 4--23
~ 4--18.
e 4--19 \--\~TOR~
I I 1...../,
KEROSENE I --' DISPENSER~~---,\
FENCE i-"11 I II 1
\ \ \ . \. .-\t~H ~·~~it\ . ._
3
, I TANK1 \ ___ _,
I \AREA I I 11 APPROXIMA TIE
\ I 1_-J 1--· V EXlENT NEW
e ;:;· ----.-, 1KEROSENE TANK --...., ._51 \ EXCAVATION
CONCRETIE \ I
\ \
0 15 30 ~iii' -'~1
\.----'
. ~
4--6
• 4--7
• 4--14
«
• 4--13
• 4--15
0
PUMP
ISLANDS
PUMP WITH
UEAKY VALVE 0
• 4--8 --
• 4--12
0
• 4--16
~
I.IW
I
FEET FIGURE 1. Sample Locations
e SOIL GAS SAMPUE LOCATION
~ MONITORING v.aL 8 EIIWIOIIKINTAL SER'IICJ:!I, INC.
N
1
CONOCO #33047
ROCKY MOUNT, NORTH CAROLINA
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
..
4-21
\
\
--
. ..
4-20
" )
I
• 4-22
0 15 30
1~1~1
F£ET
..
4-23
e SOIL GAS SAMPLE LOCATION
~ MONITORING WELL e ENVIROIIKZIITAL SJ:RVIC!:!!, INC.
PROPERlY
UNE
/
7 159
I
I :1./
\ ~
• 4-7
\ \
.. .2+0
: J .rx>O
' \
\
2 .J47 .. ,,
4-8
FIGURE 2. Total FID Volatiles
(calc'd 1'9/1)
N
t
CONOCO #33047
ROCKY MOUNT, NORTH CAROLINA
TARGET Project MLC4
TABLE 1
ANALYTE CONCENTRATIONS VIA GC/FID (\-IQ/1)
ETHYL-TOTAL FlO
SAMPLE BENZENE TOLUENE BENZENE XYLENES VOLATILES"
REPORTING LIMIT 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 10
4-1 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 10
4-2 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <10
4-3 14 191 11 17 2,140
4-4 305 993 139 85 45,360
4-5 <1.0 3.9 <1.0 <1.0 640
4-6 11 9.7 5.4 17 2,820
4-7 40 91 173 79 6,060
4-8 <1.0 1.0 <1.0 <1.0 2,347
4-9 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 95
4-10 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <10
4-11 8,260 19,800 1,142 4,690 338,152
4-12 128 931 342 2,060 13,000
4-13 1.3 26 2.8 12 1,240
4-14 1.2 8.2 1.8 11 59
4-15 34 49 5.9 19 653
4-16 21 86 38 11 4,270
4-17 <1.0 1.8 <1.0 1.7 13
4-18 <1.0 1.1 <1.0 1. 7 <10
4-19 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 1.2 <10
4-20 <1.0 3.4 <1.0 1.2 72
4-21 <1.0 1 .1 <1.0 <1.0 <10
4-22 <1.0 1 .1 <1.0 1.4 <10
4-23 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <10
FIELD CONTROL SAMPLES
4-101 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <10
4-102 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <10
4-103 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <10
~ CALCULATED USING THE SUM OF THE AREAS OF AlL INTEGRATED CHROMATOGRAM PEAKS AND THE
INSTRUMENT RESPONSE FACTOR FOR TOLUENE
1-1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
TARGET Project MLC4
TABLE 1
ANALYTE CONCENTRATIONS VIA GC/FID (~gil)
ETHYL-
SAMPLE BENZENE TOLUENE BENZENE
REPORTING LIMIT 1.0
LABORATORY DUPLICATE ANALYSIS
4-7
4-7R
4-17
4-17R
LABORATORY BLANKS
4-78
4-178
40
39
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
1.0
91
88
1.8
1.7
<1.0
<1.0
1.0
173
164
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
TOTAL FlO
XYLENES VOLATILEs•
1.0
79
64
1.7
1.9
<1.0
<1.0
10
6,060
5,850
13
15
<10
<10
• CALCULATED USING THE SUM OF THE AREAS OF ALL INTEGRATED CHROMATOGRAM PEAKS AND THE
INSTRUMENT RESPONSE FACTOR FOR TOLUENE
1-2
APPENDIX A
FIELD PROCEDURES
Soil Gas
To·collect the samples a 112 inch hole was produced to a depth of approximately 4 feet by
using a drive rod. Where pavement was present, a rotary hammer was employed for penetration
:ior to using the drive rod. The entire sampling system was purged with ambient air drawn
through an organic vapor filter cartridge, and a stainless steel probe was inserted to the full depth
of the hole and sealed off from the atmosphere. A sample of in-situ soil gas was then withdrawn
through the probe and used to purge atmospheric air from the sampling system. A second sample
of soil gas was withdrawn through the probe and encapsulated in a pre-evacuated glass vial at
two atmospheres of pressure (IS psi g). The self-sealing vial was detached from the sampling
system, packaged, labeled, and stored for laboratory analysis.
Prior to the day's field activities all sampling equipment, slide hammer rods and probes were
decontaminated by washing with soapy water and rinsing thoroughly. Internal surfaces were
flushed dry using pre-purified nitrogen or filtered ambient air, and external surfaces were wiped
clean using clean paper towels.
Soil
To collect the samples, a van-mounted hydraulic probe was used to advance a 12" long 1-
5/8" OD steel sampling tube (equipped with an acetate liner and a piston stop tip) attached to
connected 3-foot sections of 1-3/8" OD threaded steel casing (EW rod) down to the sampling
depth. An electric hammer drill was used to penetrate pavement where necessary. The piston
stop was then released and the pipe driven an additional foot, allowing soil to enter the sample
tube. The sampling tube was retrieved and the liner removed from the casing·. The sample was
relinquished in the liner to the client for analysis by an independent laboratory. The sampling
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
APPENDIX A
I tube was decontaminated by rinsing with a solution of Alconox and distilled water prior to reuse.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Gmundwatet·
To collect the samples a the hydraulic probe was used to advance E\V rod to the sampling
depth. An electric hammer drill was used to penetrate pavement where necessary. Where
borehole collapse was not a problem, the steel casing was removed and a 5-foot section of I"
diameter slotted PVC pipe connected to one or more 5-foot sections of PVC riser pipe was
inserted to the full depth of the hole. The pipe was allowed to sit for a period of time to allow
groundwater to fill the pipe. Where borehole collapse was a problem, once the steel casing was
in place, groundwater was allowed to fill the pipe. With either method, a water level sensor was
used to detect the surface of the groundwater table and to ensure that a sufficient amount of water
was present to complete a sample. The water level sensor was removed and a 21" long by 7/16"
0.0. stainless steel bailer was used to collect the sample. Samples were placed in 40 ml, teflon
septum-sealed glass vials and acidified to pH 2 using a 50% hydrochloric acid solution, sealed,
labeled and relinquished to the client for independent analysis.
Prior to the day's field activities and after collection of each sample, the steel casing and the
bailer apparatus were decontaminated by washing with Alconox (a biodegradable, laboratory
grade detergent), rinsing with distilled water and drying with filtered ambient air to ensure
discrete sampling. New PVC was used for each sample.
APPENDIX B
LABORATORY PROCEDURES
The analytical equipment was calibrated using a 3-point instrument-response curve and
injection of known concentrations of the target analytes. Retention times of the standards were
used to identify the peaks in the chromatograms of the field samples, and their response factors
were used to calculate the analyte concentrations.
Total FID Volatiles values were generated by summing the areas of all integrated
chromatogram peaks and calculated using the instrument response factor for toluene. Injection
peaks, which also contain the light hydrocarbon methane, were excluded to avoid the skewing
of Total FID Volatiles values due to injection disturbances and biogenic methane. For samples
with low hydrocarbon concentrations, the calculated Total FID Volatiles concentration is
occasionally lower than the sum of the individual analytes. This is because the response factor
used for the Total FID Volatiles calculation is a constant, whereas the individual analyte response
factors are compound specific. It is important to understand that the Total FID Volatiles levels
reported are relative, not absolute, values.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
APPENDIX C
DETECfABILITY & TERMINOLOGY
Detectabilitv
The soil gas survey data presented in this report are the result of precise sampling and
measurement of contaminant concentrations in the vadose zone. Analyte detection at a particular
location is representative of vapor, dissolved, and/or liquid phase contamination at that location.
The presence of detectable levels of target analytes in the vadose zone is dependent upon several
factors, including the presence of vapor-phase hydrocarbons or dissolved or liquid concentrations
adequate to facilitate volatilization into the unsaturated zone.
Teominology
In order to prevent misunderstanding of certain terms used in TARGETs reports, the
following clarifications are offered:
Analyte refers to any of the hydrocarbons standardized for quantification in the chromatographic
analysis.
Anomaly refers to an area where hydrocarbons were measured in excess of what would normally
be considered "natural" or "background" levels.
Elevated and significant are used to describe concentrations of analytes which indicate the
existence of a potential problem in the soil or ground water.
Featul'e is used in reference to a discernible pattern in the contoured data. It denotes a contour
form rather than a definite or separate chemical occurrence.
Indicates is used when evidence dictates a unique conclusion. Suggests is used when several
explanations of certain evidence are possible, but one in particular seems more likely. As
a result, "indicates" carries a higher degree of confidence in a conclusion than does
"suggests."
APPENDIX C
Occun-ence is used to indicate an area where chemical compounds are present in sufficient
concentrations to be detected by the analysis of soil vapors. The term is not indicative of
any speciftc mode of occurrence (vapor, dissolved, etc.), and does not necessarily indicate
or suggest the presence of "free product" or "phase-separated hydrocarbons."
Repo1ting Limit refers to the minimum concentration reported for each analyte.
· 'adose zone represents the unsaturated zone between the ground water table and the ground
surface.
The terms "low", "moderate" and "high" levels, when applied to Total flO Volatile
petroleum hydrocarbons, are relative terms based on TARGETs analysis of thousands of soil gas
samples from hundreds of sites. Less than I 00 Jlg/1 can be considered very low. Levels between
0 and I 000 Jlg/1 can be considered typical "background" levels often observed at fuel handling
facilities. "Moderate" levels include concentrations in the range of 25,000 to 50,000 Jlg/1. Levels
greater than I 00,000 Jlg/1 are deemed "high", while those greater than 750,000 11gll are
considered to be very high.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Conoco Store No. 33047-Comprehensive Site Assessment Report
Law Engineering Project 56-4533
APPENDIXB
BORING LOGS
February 6, I 995
Final
·-----·--·--------·---
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
KEY TO CLASSIFICATION & SYMBOLS
CORRELATION OF PENErRATION RESISTANCE WITH
RELATIVE DENSITY AND CONSISTENCY
No. of Blowa, N Relative Dcnaity• No. of Blowt, N Conaiaency•
.. 0-4 . Vcry-Loo.c.::·· ••••••••••••••• •• ·o >t•••···••• Very SoiL•··
5 -10 L<>ooe SILTS 2 -4 Soft
•••••• IF20•···· Firm·:··:··· ••••••• so• a•· Fum:·:::.
SANDS 21 -30 Very Finn AND 9 -15 Stiff
0 31:50 I· · ... · . i· 16ho, ·:.:. Vcry·Sdrf::::·:·· I •.. Dei'l&·.··:·· .. CLAYS
50+ Very Dente 30+ Hard
SYMBOLS DESCRIPTIONS
I Undiaturbcd Sarrq:~le (UD) Recovered
Ill Undillturbed Sample (UD) Attempted, Not Recovered
5012" No. of Blowa (50) to Drive the Split-Tube Sampler a Number of lnchca (2)
BQ,BX(BW},NQ,NX(NW), Coring Bit SW:a 'Which Yield Corea of Diameter 1-7/16, 1-21/32,
HQ,PQ 1-7/8, 2-5132.2-1/1, and 3-ll/32lnchca. Rcapcctivcfy
REC Recovery -Length of Con: Recovered Divided by Lcngt.b Cored (Percent)
Rocl:lc Quality DcaipaUoo-Lcogtb of R=ovcrcd Core Cooaiaing of
RQD Moderately Hard or Harder Core Scrmcau 4 or More lncbu Looa
Divided by lhc Length Cored (Perccm)
-Water Table Approximately 24 Houn or More After Drilling ----Water Table at T.L.rDe of Drilling (Within 1 Hour)
~ Lou of Drilling fluid
Grout
r ~ ~ Bemonitc
k ~ r..::: WELL DIAGRAM 1: \;;
I·•••·
ILl Saod
hl 12 [:; Slotted Screen
OVM Orpnic Vapor Mcuuremem
PPM Partl PeT Million
ND Not Dctcctcci
SAMPLING PROCEDURES
The Standanl Penetration Resistance is the Number of Blows of a 140-Pound Hammer Falling 30
Inches To Drive a 2-Inch O.D .• 1.4-lnch LD. Split-Tube Sampler One Foot.
• Terminology may be altered if presence of gnvel, cobbles or boulders interferes with accurate measurement of
standard penetration resistance.
TEST BORING RECORD
ELEVATION DEPTH OVM IFEETl IFEETl DESCRIPTION WELL DIAGRAM PPM l 92.97
;
;
3.5 ~?o~e U'!_h_tGray Sllghtlvc;layoy Flna to
Medium SAND-Some Organics
87.97--
8.5 ~i_rm Lig.!'t. Gray Fine to Medium SAND
Strong Odor
I 82.97--
J13.5 Loose Light Gray Medium to Coarse SAND
77.97-
18.5 ~~~m Whl:•s~:~vFCiayoy SiLT
07 on = -~ ~;>d~_o T I o<.20.0 Foot
Monitoring Well Installed to 19.0 Feet
Ground Water Measured at 7.8 Feet on
1 2/16/94
67.97-
62.97--
57.97--
52.97
REMARKS:
See attached Key Sheet for explanation of
symbols and abbreviations used above.
~ 2 ·····.1~ I~ / I~ .·
1 [::::1 ,· -
1:::: jtl~ 36
I= Iii lxl~l \ :· ,::::
1::::
1:::: '::::
1::::
1:::: 35
1:::: I~ 1::::
1::::
1::::
1:::: !;;;
I 22
DRILLED BY
LOGGED BY
CHECKED BY
PAGE 1 OF 1
Law Eng.
KJM
CLC
I
I I
I
I
I
I
DATUM ELEVATION: 92.72 Ft.
HEIGHT OF RISER: ·0.25 Ft.
PENETRATION-BLOWS PER FOOT
I
I I
~
,.-i I I
I I ' I
1·-: :
I
i ' '
I I
! i
I
I I
I I I I I
i ' I I I
; I
' ' i I I
I ..... j -
'
'
BORING NUMBER
DATE STARTED
DATE COMPLETED
JOB NUMBER
~ --------- -- ---
' !
I
! i ' I I !
!
I
I
I
I
I
I
' I
I I I I
I
I i
I I .... ···-·· -··
i !
' I
I
1
I
'
i i I
' ' I
I
I ' I I
I
I '
I
'
MW-1
12/01/94
12/01/94
56-4533
' ' Law Engineering
~
I
I
I
6 I
I
1
I
6 I
I
6 I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
! ;
~ I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
TEST BORING RECORD
ELEVATION DEPTH
(FEETI !FEET! DESCRIPTION
100.80
3.5 Firm Tan Gray CLAY
l5.80--
8.5 Very Stiff Tan Gray Micaceous Clayey SILT
QO RO -
113.5 ~'-~ Brown Gray Medium to Coarse SAND
Odor o• on
j18.5 Vo,y Stiff G'ay Clayey SILT
80.80-
123.5 Hard White Gray Clayey SILT
; on. 25
Boring Terminated at 25.0 Feet
Monitoring Well Installed to 24.0 Feet
Ground Water Measured at 16.58 Feet on
12/16/94
70.80-
R5 on -
60.80
REMARKS:
See attached Key Sheet for explanation of
symbols and abbreviations used above.
OVM
WELL DIAGRAM PPM
220
>: ·.··
440 t§i :
( ..•• 1=: •
1=: 1=:
== ==
== == != I= 178
1=:
1=: I=
1=: -
1=: 1=:
1=:
1=: I=
1=: 20
I== =
:=: I~
1=:
1=: L=
DRILLED BY
LOGGED BY
CHECKED BY
4
PAGE 1 OF 1
Law Eng.
KJM
CLC
I
I I
! I
I
DATUM ELEVATION: 100.74 Ft.
HEIGHT OF RISER: -0.06 Ft.
PENETRATION-BLOWS PER FOOT
16 20 •o 60
! i I : I I I !
I I . I I • . i
! I
I I
I I
I ' !
I
I I
I I
I i
J
I I ; !
I I I ! I I
I ' I ' '
'
. i
I I I ' i ' I I
I i i I I ' ' I ' -·----I
-·-_i _____ , --·--··-···-
I
I I
I i
I
' ' I
I
I ' i
J
I
•
'
' ! ! ! I ' i I I I ' I
I
BORING NUMBER
DATE STARTED
DATE COMPLETED
JOB NUMBER
I
I
!
'
I
I
I
'
! I I
'
I . ; :
I '
I I
I
I
I
i
I
I
I
J I
! I I I
!
i !
I ! ! '
MW-2
11/30/94
11/30/94
56-4533
Law Engineering
7
J 0
'
' 6
' 0
~
~ '
TEST BORING RECORD
ELEVATION DEPTH OVM IFEETJ (FEET) DESCRIPTION WELL DIAGRAM PPM
U./ I.
B Inches Asphalt
3.5 Fill-Clay, Wood, Roots
oo n<. 5. Firm Brown Gray Slightly Silty CLAY
900
8.5 I' .
Very Stiff White Brown Gray Slightly Silty I= 355 "' n<
CLAY 1::: 1::: 1::: I=
1:::
1::: I= 13.5 Very Firm White Brown Gray Slightly Clayey 1:::
1::: 7 158 Fine Grained SAND I~ 38.05--
1::: I= I=
1::: 1:::
j18.5 . 1::: ~-ery Firm Brow~ -~ed Gray Slightly Clayey 1::: Fine Grained SAND )··I= 145 R10~ -1::: • !::: ,. 1-= 1::: 1::: 1:::
1::: [23.5 1::: Firm White Gray Clayey SILT I=
7o n<. h< 2
~~ri~g I i j at25.0 Feet
Monitoring Well Installed to 24.0 Feet
Ground Water Measured at 14.23 Feet on
12/16/94
70 -
68.05--
63.05
REMARKS:
See attached Key Sheet for explanation of
symbols and abbreviations used above.
DRILLED BY
LOGGED BY
CHECKED BY
PAGE 1 OF 1
1------
Law Eng.
KJM
CLC
!
I
I
I
DATUM ELEVATION: 102.64 Ft.
HEIGHT OF RISER: -0.41 Ft.
PENETRATION-BLOWS PER FOOT , E
I I '
I I I
! I I
I I I ,
' . ; . -;·-
I I
i
' I I i I
i j I 1 I I I !
i i i I I I
I I I I ' ' I I I ' ' ! I I I ' I ! I i I I ! ' I I ' I i PI ' i I i I
I '
I I
i
' I
I
I I I
I I ' i ' ' ' • I I~ I I ' i
I I ! I ' i
' ' I '
I
' ' I
I
I
I I
I i I ' I ' I I
J i -. :--i ' --
i
. ; , I ' I i I
' I I I
I I i
I
BORING NUMBER
DATE STARTED
DATE COMPLETED
JOB NUMBER
------== ::' ~
i
I i I ' !
'
I
I
i
' i
i
I
!
i i
' :
I ' I I I
' i I I
I !
MW-3
11/22/94
11/22/94
56·4533
• • Law Engineering
------------------------------
,,
8
2
2
2
I
I
I
I
I
6
I
.I
I
I
'I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~
I )
l ~
I ~·
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
TEST BORING RECORD
ELEVATION DEPTH OVM (FEET! (FEET! DESCRIPTION WELL DIAGRAM PPM
J103.04
oo.
QO
oo n.
0 _4 ~Inch Asphalt
0.8 1 ~ lnchas
5 Inches Base -Crushed Stone
4 ·0 rum Brown Gray Silty CLAY -
/::
I
8·5 1----,Hc;---ard;-;1 G:--ray•,-;:;-c: Bm-:c:-wn1-;:c Sll=ightl;:-:-;:-yS:-:an::;dy:-:, c=lay:-::-;eyS::;;IL-:;:T,...-jl 1=1
' 1:: ' 1:: 1:: 1:::
-
3 · 5 f->. :;::::~rr::-y,:-;::: Fir=-'m, W~h;;:-ite:Z: G •ra::-y:-;Co;o::a:;:rs::a-;t-;:o-;:M;;:e:;;d;;:iu;;:m::----J
Silty SAND
1::: 1::: I= @ 1::: 1:: 1::: I= 1::
., 04 -I~···
',
8 · 5 1--=-Fll rm ---,G::-r-ay--=c-oa-r-sa--=G-ra71 n-e-:d-=c Sill .,-tYI-;:-S A=ND;:----1
1
. \ ~~
t:: I 1::: . . I::::
ln·~~~~-==-------1 ~----Very Stiff Gray Clayey SILT
7R 04 125
73.04--
68.04-.
63.04
~~ri~g 1 at 25.0 Feet
Monitoring Well Installed to 24.0 Feet
Ground Water Measured at 14.56 Feet on
12/16/94
' 1::: 1::: 1::: I=
852
693
"2075
REMARKS:
See attached Key Sheet for explanation of
symbols and abbreviations used above.
DRILLED BY
LOGGED BY
CHECKED BY
PAGE 1 OF 1
Law Eng.
KJM
CLC
I
DATUM ELEVATION: 102.77 Ft.
HEIGHT OF RISER: ·0.27 Ft.
PENETRATION-BLOWS PER FOOT
I I
I ! .. i
' i
I : I ' i I I I i i
I I ',.-+
I I
'
' ! : I ! I i
' I I I
I I
I
r I
I T' ' . II
I I 'I I I. I I I
' I
I I
I I I I I
I
! I I
I
I
I
BORING NUMBER
DATE STARTED
DATE COMPLETED
JOB NUMBER
I I I
, I
i I
I I I ! I I I I
I I ' !
i I I
I
MW·4
11122/94
1 1122/94
56·4533
Law Engineering
'
I 6
"
0
~ u
" 0:
m 3 ~ " M m ~ " M m • m ~
TEST BORING RECORD
ELEVATION OEPTH
(FEETJ (FEETJ DESCRIPTION WELL DIAGRAM
OVA
PPM
103.01 No Samples Taken
98.01--
93.01-
88.01--
83.01--
78.01--
ZB. S f--::-S::-:tif7t ;:-W;;-h.::-oto--cG::-,-ay--::::CI-ay_o_y 75;:-IL:;-T -w.,-it;-h 75,-ho-;:-11---l
Fragments.
73.01--
68.01-
63.01
33 5 r--. ------. Stiff White Grey Clayey SILT with Shell
Fragments. -
385h-------· Herd White Gray Clayey SILT with Very Weathe ad
Rock Material.
REMARKS:
-
16
2.5
17
DRILLED BY
LOGGED BY
CHECKED BY
PAGE 1 OF 2
DATUM ELEVATION: 102.86 Ft.
HEIGHT OF RISER: -0.15 Ft.
PENETRATION-BLOWS PER FOOT
I
0 6 10 16 20 40 60 so 100 I
I I I
I I
'
I
I I I :
'
I I I I ! ' I '
' ! ' .! j _____ !. ! ! ' ! i !
I I I I
I I I i
'1 I ' I !
I i I i
I ! I I i I I I I I l-H i I I i Iii I I I 1---t--+---1' 1-----1 ! -~-! -~ I I ~--, . I ' . ' ' I ' . I ! I I ' ! . ! • j i I I I I I I 1 ! I '
I I ' i I i ! i
I I I i I ! ' I ' ---,--! T-, ---~-·:-T! -~~---i--
1 I I
I I
I (T
I
!
II i i i
' I ! ' ' '
1 __ --JI_.....JI __ [_[ ___ L_L~_i _I I_
i ! I i i I I i I I i
i 1,: I i I ~ I I I I i
i I I I I i ! I
I I I I I ! i ! ----~---+ T ·; T ~---:--r··;
I i il 'II I ill
11'-I
I f'--1 I j
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
'I
I
44
I
LAW
JKM
CLC
BORING NUMBER
DATE STARTED
DATE COMPLETED
JOB NUMBER
MW-5
11/28/94 1
11/30/94
56-4533
I
LAW ENGINEERING I
I
I
I
" I ~ ~ ,
" " •
I ~ " • • • ~ "
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
TEST BORING RECORD
ELEVATION DEPTH
!FEET) !FEET) DESCRIPTION OVA
WELL DIAGRAM PPM
63.01
us~ - - - - - - -' Very Dense White Brown Gray Partially Weather d 13
58.01-
53.01--
Rock MateriaL Micaceous with Some Clay.
Four Inch PVC Casing Installed to 40 Feet. No
Samples Collected to Termination Depth.
53 . 0 +--.,.....,..,-,-,T,.,--,.. Boring erminated at 53.0 Feet. =
48.01-
43.01--
38.01-
33.01-
28.01-
23.01
REMARKS:
Monitoring Well Installed to 53.0 Feet
Ground Water Measured at 4.39 Feet on 1 2/16/ 4.
DRILLED BY
LOGGED BY
CHECKED BY
PAGE 2 OF 2
PENETRATION-BLOWS PER FOOT
0 s 10 16 20 40 60 90 100
I i -ni-t-1--i----il-t--+-1 Hp·-
1 I , ! I I I I t !
i I i i
I I
I I
i ! I I
I i I I 1----j---:---i---·-----:-·-~-~-!-l~---
i I [1
I I i i' I i
I I i I I I I
l---t-l---t--1:---1-H-l
i ; I I l
LAW
JKM
CLC
I
I
I
I
I I I H ~~~--
1 I
I I
1 I -n-
1 I 1 I I 1 i
I I ' I I I I I
i I I I ! 1 I
I i l I I I I I : 1-i-~~+t-1~-
i
I
i
I
I i I
BORING NUMBER
DATE STARTED
DATE COMPLETED
JOB NUMBER
MW-5
11/28/94
11/30/94
56-4533
f--.-.-::
• ' LAW ENGINEERING
TEST BORING RECORD
ELEVATION DEPTH OVM !FEET! \FEET! DESCRIPTION WELL DIAGRAM PPM
~ 100.08 0.7 ~/2 Inches Asphalt
5 Inch Base
4 ·0 Very Stiff White n Gray Silty CLAY
~ ~ ; s 95.08--
i '
90.08-
85.08-
80.08-
r
....•.•... ·-·· !E .-· ~~~~~~~~A-f---j•;:u:11~=r 8·5 l Very Stiff 'Gray Silty CLAY /[~1 ,. ·.
\?i l:=:r
I I=
-
3 ·5 1--:-Lo-:-o-:s-:-e""T"'a~n= G 'ra=y-:C;:-o:::a=rs=e-:, S;:;lh:::;:i 'gh~tlly -:-,;:-;;; s 'il t =Y,-;;-; S A-;:;;:ND;--j
-
I= I= ~ = ;= ·= = i= I= I= I~ I= ~=-~~~~--~~~~~~~· I= 8 ·5 l=irrn Gray Very Coarse Grained Silty SAND !=:
-...... I I=
I= I= ~
1
23·5 Firm Grey Clayey SILT
75.08-1""· T "" 25o F ;•" ~?"~g at . eet
Monitoring Well Installed to 22.0 Feet
Ground Water Measured at 11.83 Feet on
12/16/94
70.08--
REMARKS:
See attached Key Sheet for explanation of
symbols and abbreviations used above.
Note: No OVMs collected
PAGE 1 OF 1
DRILLED BY
LOGGED BY
CHECKED BY
DATUM ELEVATION: 99.81 Ft. I
HEIGHT OF RISER: ·0.27 Ft.
PENETRATION·BLOWS PEA FOOT I ~ '0 60
I i : I I : I ' I I
' I I I I i I I ' '
I I I I I
I ' I ' : ... 2 'I
!
;-I
' •
i ' I
' 1 i ri-1 --+-': I 1-----:+ .. : ...... : .....
I
,I
I
1--+--~-i-tl -H--t--+-f----H-T--t--1 " I
I
1--i--11-++---
Law Eng.
KJM
CLC
I I I
'
1 ' '
' ' I i ' I I ' I 1
I ' ' I ;--j ...
BORING NUMBER
DATE STARTED
DATE COMPLETED
JOB NUMBER
--.=: .:::.. ----- -:' "':
I I
'
'
i i
'
I
I
I
I
I I
!-_!
I I I
' '
I I I
'
I
! I '
MW-6
11/22/94
11/22/94
56-4533
" '" Law Engineering
I
'I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I ~
~ ~
~ ~-
~ \. ~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
TEST BORING RECORD
ELEVATION DEPTH
IFEETI lFEETI DESCRIPTION
1100.20 0.4 "'-2 1_12 Inches As£halt
1.7 2 1/2 lnchas
1 Foot Base • Sand and Gravel Mx
3.5 Stiff Red/Brown Gray Silty CLAY
95.20--
8.5 Very Firm White Gray"' Slightly Silty Clayey
Fine to Medium SAND
QO ?0· -
13.5 Loose Tan Grav Fine to Medium SAND
i 85.20
118.5 Loose White Gray Slightly Clayey Medium
SAND 80.20-
123.5 Stiff White Gray Clayey SILT
7" 20· 15 ~~ri~_g Terminated at 23.00 teet
Monitoring Well Installed to 22.0 Feet
Ground Water Measured at 14.81 Feet on
12/16/94
I 70.20
"" ?0 -
60.20
REMARKS:
See attached Key Sheet for explanation of
symbols and abbreviations used above.
OVM
WELL DIAGRAM PPM
448
I
'I= <~
1=1·
El i 525 = = I= i' ·r= -I= I= I~ 1::: I=' _,;327 I=' 1::: I= '=' = = I= I=:= I= 30 I=' ltl=. I= I I=' l.=
5
DRILLED BY
LOGGED BY
CHECKED BY
PAGE 1 OF 1
Law Eng.
KJM
CLC
i
' I . :
I
i i
DATUM ELEVATION: 100.00 Ft.
HEIGHT OF RISER: -0.20 Ft.
PENETRATION-BLOWS PER FOOT
e -' I
I
I I
,,
I I I I I I , i
I
I
' I I I
I ' I
I i I I I I .. .. _,_ .!.
i
I ' ' ;
'
I
~ . ; -'
I
I I
I I
' ' l i I I
I
I
I
BORING NUMBER
DATE STARTED
DATE COMPLETED
JOB NUMBER
--~-- ---
' I i
I
I
i ' t ' I ..
!
I
' I
'
I
I
' I
I ; : I
I
I I
i I
I I I I ---!----!--·
i '
I
I , I
I
I
I
I
i I I
I '
I
MW-7
11/29/94
11/29/94
56-4533
. . Law EnQineering
2
'
•
12
TEST BORING RECORD
ELEVATION DEPTH
(FEET) !FEET) DESCRIPTION l 97.98
1.0 _ 3 1/2 Inches Asphalt
8 Inches Base-Send end Gravel Mix ~ ;
3.5 ; Loose Gray Tan Micaceous Slightly Clayey
! : 92.98-Fine to Medium SAND
8.5 ~i~~-~~ite Tan. G~ay Clayey Medium Grained
SAND Strong Hydrocarbon Odor, Some Rock 87.98--Fragments
J13.5 ~~~~n8ed;AND n Slightly Silty Medium
82.98-Odor
18.5 Very Firm Gray Medium Grained SAND
No Odor
77.98-
122.0 Boring Terminated at 22.0 Feet
Monitoring Well Installed to 21 .0 Feet
Ground Water Measured at 13.22 Feet on
12/16/94
72.98-
67.98--
62.98--
57.98
REMARKS:
See attached Key Sheet for explanation of
symbols and abbreviations used above.
OVM
WELL DIAGRAM PPM
I 612
I.
:.~ I=· .
··-.···· ~~ . ::: < :::1 I~ 503
I ~~~
. I= I= j::: I= I= -
I= I= 58 1::: ::: ::: ::: ::: :~ 1:::
·•· 1::::: ~····· { 1:::
21
1/ ~
DRILLED BY
LOGGED BY
CHECKED BY
PAGE 1 OF 1
Law Eng.
KJM
CLC
I
I
DATUM ELEVATION: 97.66 Ft.
HEIGHT DF RISER: -0.32 Ft.
PENETRATION·BLOWS PER FOOT
I I
i
i '
i l
I I I
' i t--:
! I i
1 r I
I !
I
I
I
I
!
i
i ' i
I I I
BORING NUMBER
DATE STARTED
DATE COMPLETED
JOB NUMBER
~"C. ------::' "=;
I I
I I I I I
I
I I
:
i
: I
I I
I
I I
i
I !
I
I i
I I
I
I
!
I I
I
' I I
I
I
l
60 80
! I I I
i ' i I I L
' ! I '
I
I I !
i
I I I
I i
I ! i ' ! ! . I
I
I
I I
'
I
I I I I I
I I
I I
I • I I I
II
1 I
I i I ' I
' ' I !
I
I L
MW·8
11/29/94
11/29/94
56-4533
• • Law Engineering
I
I
I
7 I
I
1
I
8 I
I ,..
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Conoco Store No. 33047-Comprehensive Site Assessment Report
Law Engineering Project 56-4533
APPENDIXC
MONITORING WELL INSTALLATION RECORDS
NCDEHNR FORM GW-1
February 6, 1995
Final
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
NORTti CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT, HEALTH AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT. GROUNDWATER SECTION
P.O. BOX 27687 ·RALEIGH. NC 27611·7687
PHONE {919)733·3221
WELL CONSTRUCTION RECORD
DRILLING CONTRACTOR --'L::.:U.:..:W..:_.::..tr'-"1g,_.,.:..:n-"'ee,_,_(_,_/ (1'--93--------
DRILLER REGISTRATION NUMBER ~32..
1 WELL LOCATION: (Show sketch at the locatiOn below)
Nearest Town: Rock'i Mourd , N .(.
~Road. Commumty. or Subdivision and Lot No.)
,, "C "' 2. OWNER ·-0'" lC lllv'
ADDRESS I)O"J;;Wo (;00 rloV!i<-Ql).il't f;~fljvlci-
J.., . (Street QJ Route No_)
,)'1-.?tviV l ~ 11D7'j
City or Town State Zio Code
3. DATE DRILLED 12./1 ( 94 USE OF WELL G'-W .N\tndon ll ~
'· TOTAL DEPTH \q ted CUTTINGS COLLECTED [j(J Yes 0 No
5. DOES WELL REPLACE EXISTING WELL? 0 Yes [8l No
6. STATIC WATER LEVEL: 1oi? FT. 0 above TOP OF CASING. , ~ !i!:l below
TOP OF CASING IS ~o,·,_•o FT. ABOVE LAND SURFACE.
7. YIELD [gpm): ~fr METHOD OF TEST liJt -"-'.l..---,, ('; -'-"'------
8. WATER ZONES [depth):---'-"'-'-'--------------
9. CHLORINATION: Type --'N"'-ft'----Amount
10. CASING:
11.
From 0
From
From
GROUT:
From
Watl Thickness Depth Diameter or Weight/Ft. Material
To 19 --'--'---F 1. .::2__:_1 ;_::11L:o:..h,_ ~( H .lj 0
To ---FL---
To ---FI.---
Deeth Material
0 To 1<"1 N liJX (Urn' ll r FI. __ -'----
Pvc.
MethOd
i'rem 'e-p, pe
From ____ To ___ FI. _____ _
12. SCREEN:
Deotl'l Diameter Slot Size Material
From __ 4_,__ To-'l._g,___ Fl. _2 __ in. 0. 0 I 0 in. Pvc.
From----To ___ Ft. ___ in. ___ 1n. __ _
From ____ To ___ Ft.----in. ___ ,n.
13. GRAVEL PACK:
Deoth
From___c3 __ To 20
Size
fine("l) F I. --'='-'---'--
From ____ To ___ Ft. _____ _
Material
Slltlct
/\i\W-1
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
Quad. No.-------Serial No.----
Lai. _______ Long. ____ Pc __
Minor Basin--------------
Basin Code--------------Header Ent. _______ GW-1 Ent. __ _
STATE WELL CONSTRUCTION N"
PERMIT NUMBER: '"'
County: fdqecambe
Depth DRILLING LOG
From To Formation Description
3'12 +i SH \oc;e llljllt g,-~,~ ',lt~l'ltl~ CIC!W'I
Qilf to rnell0u •\'1 StJ.11 d
8''~ ·H iJ!\. ·flr11'1li\ih+ gt'l.l-'1 f111e -~nedltil\1 9\Nl.i
!3'tl H. iSfl I UC>k ( l~ht G(CLj lnfillv,\'1 ·CI)VW ~~~~0
IB'Ilh 20H firm 1~n1!t Q1A\I Cll~e~ SILT
lf additional soace is needed use oack of term.
LOCATION SKETCH
(Show direction and distance tram at least two State Roads.
or other mao reterence points)
14. REMARKS:-------------------------------------------
1 DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS WELL WAS
STANDARDS. AND THAT A COPY OF THIS RECORD
CW-1 REVISED 2i90 Submit anginal to Division of Environmental Management and copy to well owner.
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT, HEALTH AND NAT\JRAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAl MANAGEMENT • GROUNOWA TER SECTION
P.O. BOX 27687· RALEIGH, NC 27611·7687
PHONE (919)733·3221
WELL CONSTRUCTION RECORD
DRILLING CONTRACTOR _,_lt,,_l W:;:......::tc:..:n:;.y.c:l f1.:.:t:.:<r:..:lc:._cl:..;;jl------
~~-1 DRILLER REGISTRATION NUMBER -'--'-'1--:::__ ______ _
i. WELL LOCATION: (Show sk.etcn of !he locanon below]
Nearest Town: KGCk~ Movnr N.C .
~Roaa. Commun1ty. or Subdivision ana LOt No.l
2. OWNER CONL\0 :fut-·
ADDRESS yO:?OtVQ I jt00 f'}, \:Uin~;,P"JhJ-v(~
;.L., -1"\s tStreel or u1e No.) nclht11V 1 ~ 1101 y
Citv or Town State Zio Coae
3. DATE DRILLED \\{~Qjq.q USE OF WELL (;W 1\\DndO(In'J
4 TOTAL DEPTH 2LJ -\l'e._j CUTTINGS COLLECTED ~Yes 0 No
5. DOES WELL REPLACE EXISTING WELL? 0 Yes ~No
6. STATIC WATER LEVEL: li!•')~
TOP OF CASING IS ~ 0• 01,
FT. 0 above TOP OF CASING. ~below
FT. ABOVE LAND SURFACE.
7. YIELD (gpm J: __,Nc:l\,_ ___ METHOD OF TEST __,IIJu.fr.__ ___ _
8. WATER ZONES (depth): ---'-'N'-'1.;,.\-___________ _
9. -CHLORINATION: Type NA Amount
10. CASING: Wall Thickness
Depth Diameter or We1gnt1Ft. Matenal
0 From----To 24 Ft. 21nth ~'CH 40 PVL
From----To Ft.
From----To Ft.
ll. GROUT:
Depth Matenal Method
MW-2
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
Quad. No.------Serial No.----
Lat. ______ Long.----Pc __
Minor Basin-------------
Basin Code-------------
Header Ent. GW-1 Ent.
STATE WELL CONSTRUCTION
PERMIT NUMBER:
County: f<Jgec.ombe.
Deeth DRILLING LOG
From To F ormat1on DescriPtion
'3 ''2. n SH TifM l:t~n ~~ CLAy
3'1z {·t IDH
1'Ctl4 ·Sllf!' ~ i0.11 1)17'#, (1'\\(~uV'-Cl~f!:j
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Slt.:l
I~ ''z ft \Sf\ I icm llr\lw iJ ~a~ lllW\~m CuCV\,(1
SANP
\3 112. ft LOf-t Vel'~ S\i((' -fld\!j Cl!1~e01 SILl I
13112 fr.;H 11•\Vll ~\Jt\\i( Cj 1~ (~~ S1L1
_ ____ ___}I
I' ===::;";,a~d:;;d';;;-ti;;;on~a;;,l,;;s;;;pa;;;c;.;e:,:l;;s.;,n:;•;;ed;;;e;.;d:,:u;;;s:;•.;";;a;;c;;k.;o;;f.;lo;;rm;;;;,. ===~
LOCATION SKETCH
I (Show 01rection and distance tram at least two State Roads.
or other mao reference oo1nts}
I
From 0 To2• 9 Ft. Nto.tCCmirJt--rrem•e. p;'l"'-
From To Ft.
12. SCREEN:
13.
t4.
Deptn Diameter Slot Size Material
From 9 To 24 Ft. 2 in. 0.010 in. eve
From To Ft. '"· '"·
From To Fl. in. in.
GRAVEL PACK:
Depth Size Material
From l To 24 Ft. flat 1~1) SG\tlg
From To Ft.
REMARKS:
1 DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS WELL WAS CONST
STANDARDS. ANO THAT A COPY OF THIS RECORD
see Site plM I
I
I
I
I
GW·l REVISED 2i90 Submn anginal to Division of Environmental Management and copy to well owner. I
I
I
I
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT, HEALTH AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT • GROUNDWATER SECTION
P.O. BOX 27887 • RAL.£1GH, NC 27611•7687
PHONE [phone]·3221
WELL CONSTRUCTION RECORD
I DRILLER REGISTRATION NUMBER
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1. WELL LOCATION: (Show sketch ol the locatiOn below)
Nearest Town: ReCK~ Movf\t , tJ .C .
~Roaa. Commumtv. or Subdivision ana Lot No.)
2. owNER ~onoco J()c,
ADDREss 9o'?lo.z.0 1 too f'} • ·uaif~ A~SvaL
I. l...... _ LStreet or ReuS No.l 0 •oiL'?rV~--' --y=y; 1?D-il
City or ro..!n State Zio Code
' :;)ATE DRILLED 11122194 USE OF WELL G-W MOt"iit0(1()8
2iJ ftef CUTTINGS COLLECTED ~Yes 0 No .l TOTAL DEPTH
5. DOES WELL REPLACE EXISTING WELL? 0 Yes _g) No
5. STATIC WATER LEVEL: \({,1!,?1 FT. 0 above TOP OF CASING. \il below
TOP OF CASING IS -0Hjl FT. ABOVE LAND SURFACE.
7. YIELD Cgpm 1: _:_N:...:I\-.:.._ ___ METHOD OF TEST _:_:j\).:,fr'-------
8. WATER ZONES (deeth): __ ,_,JIJ'-'1\-'--------------
9. CHLORINATION: Typo -...L(I)"-'-'i\-__ Amount
10. CASING:
Wall Thickness
Death Diameter or We1gnttFt. Matenal
0 From ___ To -·=-2Li-'---Ft.-=2:..:.t'c::nc"-h'--S[)-1 40 Pvc
From ---To ___ Ft. __ _
From ----To Fl.----
11. GROUT:
Deotn Matenai Method
From 0 To-5'---_Ft. NW L~m<n t lr~m~ Pie&
From ----To ___ Ft. ------
12. SCREEN:
13.
14.
From
Deotn
-~-To ZL! Cj
Diameter Slat Size Material
Ft._Z=---;n.U.0/0 in. PVC.
From ----To, ___ Ft. ___ in. ___ 'n.
From ----To ___ Ft. ___ in. ___ in.
GRAVEL PACK:
Deotn Size Material
From 7 __:. __ ToZ4.1 Ft. hne ( 111) SQ.t\d
From ----To ___ Ft. _____ _
REMARKS:
1 DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS WELL WAS CONSTR
ST ANOAROS. AND THAT A COPY OF THIS RECORD H
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
Quad. No.------Serial No.----
Lat. Long. Pc __
Minor Basin-------------
Basin Coda-------------
Header Ent. _______ GW-1 Ent. __
STATE WELL CONSTRUCTION
PERMIT NUMBER:
County: tctse(ornbe
oeoth DRILLING LOG
From To Formation Description
3 ltzf1 Sf-\-.
3'1z tj \\)( t.
)'l".d1. ISH.
l?.!''t.H lG4.
B''z. 1\ iS{ l.
11 additional so ace IS needed use back of form.
LOCATION SKETCH
(Show direCtion anel distance tram at least two State Roads.
or other mao reference oomtsl
5 NCAC 2C. WELL CONSTRUCTION
EA.!ld. r
GW-1 REVISED 2190 Submit anginal to Division at Environmental Management and cooy to well owner.
':\!:1' ..
I
I
1'40RT1i CAROLINA DEPARTUENT OF ENVIRONMENT, HEAL Ttl AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF EHVIRONUENTAL MANAGEMENT • GROUNDWATER SECTION
P.O. BOX 27e87 ·RALEIGH. NC 27611·7687
PHONE (919)733·3221
WELL CONSTRUCTION RECORD
DRILLING coNTRAcToR Lttw En~Jnee.rtl\q
DRILLER REGISTRATION NUMBER '}32-
1 WELL LOCATION: (Show sketch of the locatton Oetow)
Nea~es< Town, Rock~ M0v11t 1 IJ.C.
:Road. Communtty, or Subdivision and Lot No.l
2. OWNER C!Jl\OW 1fi£-·
City or Town State Zio Code
3 DATE DRILLED
.1 TOTAL DEPTH
1112Z.I94 usE oF WELL GW Mbndunng
2L{ [Ce_f CUTTINGS COLLECTED ~Yes 0 No
5. DOES WELL REPLACE EXISTING WELL' 0 Yes i8J No
6. STATIC WATER LEVEL \<j,!}\> FT 0 above TOP OF CASING. (! below
TOP OF CASING IS -Oe'!-"1 FT. ABOVE LAND SURFACE.
7. YIELD (gpml' N A-METHOD OF TEST -'-N'-'fr'------
B. WATER ZONES (dePth), ----"'1.)-'-'-----------
9. -CHLOAINA T!ON:
10. CASING:
Type lJ ft
DePth
F•om _0 ___ To Z4 Fl.
Amount
wau Thickness Diameter or Weight/Ft.
-2!:.!1-"'nr.h::..:. S'C H 40
F1om ____ To ___ Fl. ___ _
From ----70 Fl.---
11. GROUT:
DePth Matenal
Material Pvc
Method
FOR OFFICE USE ONLV
Ouad. No.------Serial No. ----
Lat. Lon;. Pc --
Minor Basin-------------
Basin Code-------------
Header Ent. _______ GW-1 Ent.--
STATE WELL CONSTRUCTION ''A,
PERMIT NUMBER: '"
County: Edgecomb e
Deoth DRILLING LOG
From To Formation Description
~H I;{.f
3''2ft· \\H
1~'12 H ISH.
I B'tzJi. lCH.
z~1'2 n .2SH
I
I
I
I
I
I
I ·fl~Wi!A/ C&cw smiocd Silt"'(
ye.v~ Sl i R 9Y\Vi ClO:\j~\1 ~IL\' ----1
----1 It additional so ace is needed use back of form.
LOCATION SKETCH
(Show direction and distance tram at least two State Roads,
or other mao reference OOintS) I
I
From 0 To 6• 6 Ft. ~leu Um1nt -rrem I e.. e 'C"-s1ie r lOJ'\ see
12.
13.
14.
From To Ft.
SCREEN'
Deeth Diameter Slot Size Matenal
From 9 To 2A Fl. 2. in. 0.010 in. Pvc
From To ___ Ft. 1n. 1n.
From To Ft. 1n. in.
GRAVEL PACK,
Deeth Size Material
From l To Z4. B Fl. fifle (111) So.nd
From To ___ Fl.
REMARKS'
I DO HEREBY CERTIFY ,'HAT THIS WELL WAS CONSTR
STANDARDS. AND THAT A COPY OF THIS RECORD H
GW·1 REVISED 2.190 Submit anginal to Division of Environmental Management and cooy to well owner.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
NORTti CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT. HEALTH AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT· GROUNDWATER SECT10N
P.O. BOX 271587 • RALEIGH, NC 27611·7687
PHONE [phone]·3221
WELL CONSTRUCTION RECORD
I DRILLING coNTRAcToR --"L""'t\""w'--'t"'. \'ltQ'-'1 (\,_,_( c,_:r-'-'1'\-c;~l------I DRILLER REGISTRATION NUMBER ) ~-.z._
I
1. WELL LOCATION: (Show sketch of the locatiOn below)
NeareSI Town' RI!X.K'{ ;\,lov.1t , 1'J {.
~Roaa. Commumty. or Subdivision ana Lot No.)
tonclo T.-1c I 2. OWNER
ADDREss Po :3,12 for I
-11J7{/
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
i
Hcvs.tcn
City or Town State Zip Code
J. DATE DRILLED 11//.31'14 USE OF WELL G-v.J .'\,\ul'\llvfln~
CUTTINGS COLLECTED [8l Yes 0 No J TOTAL DEPTH S 3 --"'-=---
s. DOES WELL REPLACE EXISTING WELL? 0 Yes i&No
6. STATIC WATER LEVEL' 4.,:,4 FT. 0 above TOP OF CASING. ~below
TOP OF CASING IS ____ FT. ABOVE LAND SURFACE.
7. YIELD [gpm], _.::N:!!A"'---METHOD OF TEST --"\-Jc::A::_ ___ _
8. WATER ZONES [deothl' _,_IJ_A--'----------------
9. -CHLORINATION'
10. CASING'
From 0
i=rom 0
From
11. GROUT'
Type NA Amount
Wall Thickness
DePth Diameter or We1ght/Ft.
To 45 Ft. 41()<1:J SCH4a "'., ·21"Ch SC~4o To "" Ft.
To Ft.
DePth Mater~al
From c. ~--To 4 3 Ft. OCOJ lfillt>1 t
From ____ To Ft.------
12. SCREEN'
Deotn Diameter Slot Size
From ¥.3 To S3 Ft. 2 in. 0,010 in.
From To Ft. 1n. ---in.
From To Ft. 1n. 1n.
13. GRAVEL PACK'
Material
f)V(,
PVC
Material
PVL
Depth Size Material
14.
From 4JI To ss Ft. 11·rw (u I) St.v>d
From To ___ Ft.
REMARKS'
I DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS WELL WAS CONSTR
STANDARDS. AND THAT A COPY OF THIS RECORD H
lv\ w-r;
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
Quad. No.------Serial No.----
Lat. Long. Pc --
Minor Basin-------------
Basin Code-------------
Header Ent. GW-1 Ent
STATE WELL CONSTRUCTION
PERMIT NUMBER:
County:
Deeth
From
Z\3 11l-!l
~:S'-211
33'1z q
4~'tz,-n
To
:sell
1SH
IJD{i
4~£j
DRILLING LOG
F ormat1on Descnotion
1\() Silt110fS CCJ!ie.cted ~0 femtlrnfro,
()CQt\\
11 additional soace 1s needed use oack ot form.
LOCATION SKETCH
(Show direct•on ana distance tram at least two State Roads.
or other mao reference oomtsl
I
I GW-1 REVISE 0 2190 Submit anginal to Division ot Environmental Management and cooy to well owner.
!
NORT1-I CAROLINA DEPARlVENTOF EHVIRONMEHT. HEAL Tli AND NAT\JRAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT· GROUNDWATER SECTION
P.O. BOX 27887 ·RALEIGH, NC 27611·7687
PHONE (919)733·3221
WELL CONSTRUCTION RECORD
DRILLING CONTRACTOR l.o.W t(\91f1tert flg
DRILLER REGISTRATION NUMBER ~12.-
1. WELL LOCATION: (Show sketch of the location below)
,earest Town R<XJ<._1 Mount 1 /JOrih WrvlifK'-
':Roaa. Communny, or SubdiviSIOn ana Lot No.)
2. owNER ____ ~C~·c~N~O~w~·1-~-~n~"-·--------------------~
A ooRE s s _ _,_P-=-o1J"'o'-'fl)"-'0'--t-, --'*11"'-0o":-:-'oN'-""*'ri""'.*' ~v"-'cu;::.·'-tlr~'-'-lb=.ctllVi=-:..:.:rCL"---',_0, ., _ _,_0 LStreet or Route No.l q n "'-" n n 1101
J. DATE DRILLED
City or Town ) State Zio Code
11122 I q4 USE OF WELL G-W r\tOYitiOrt "@
22 Jeei CUTTINGS COLLECTED i:8:l Yes 0 No J. TOTAL DEPTH
5. DOES WELL REPLACE EXISTING WELL? 0 Yes i8l No
6. STATIC WATER LEVEL 1Jo0'.3 FT. 0 above TOP OF CASING .
• )-w ~ below
TOP OF CASING IS JD<'v• FT. ABOVE LAND SURFACE.
7. YIELD (gpmlo __ N=' fr'-----METHOD OF TEST N A-
N ~~-----
8. WATER ZONES (deptnlo ---'-'UJ..------------
9. CHLORINA TIONo Type __ !-'N"-/t!,__ Amount
10. CASING:
Wall Thickness
Depth Diameter or Weight/Ft. Mate nat
From 0 To -=:,__Ft. llnth SCH 40 2'2 Pvc
From To _____ Ft. ____ __
From To ---FL-----
11. GROUTo
Deoth Matenal Method
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
Quad. No.------Serial No.----
Lat. Long. Pc __
Minor Basin-------------
Basin Code-------------
Header Ent. GW-1 Ent.
STATE WELL CONSTRUCTION
PERMIT NUMBER:
countv tdgeccfYII?e
Deeth
From
L\H
3''zH.
\1'/l +:J
l\3ttz/i
n'':dl
To
S-It
10H.
IS·H.
20-fi
2Sft
DRILLING LOG
Formatton oescnotion
V ~ V1.j $I I (( 11 ([/ bf() W t1 Q ti1.Aj
lw~e jo.1 0t~t C~C><'<;( .;.tr9htl"'
S1 11'1 .SANQ '
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
---~1
\1 additional soace is needed use back of lorm.
LOCATION SKETCH
(Show Q1rect10n and distance from at least two State Roads.
or other mao reterence oomtsl
I
I
I
From ---'0"-----To '3, '5 Ft. NW.tC~rMn !-lremie-r'ee. see ~,te pl().rl From ____ To Ft. _____ _
12. SCREENo
13.
14.
From
DePth
-'---To n I
Diameter Slot Size
Ft.__:2:;__;n_ 0.010 ;n.
Matenal
Pvc
From ____ To _____ Ft. _____ on. ____ on. __ _
From ____ To Ft. ____ in. ___ ,n.
GRAVEL PACKo
Oeoth
--'-'-''---To 11. g FromLj_q
Size
Ft. -fine (lli)
From ______ To _____ Ft. __________ _
REMARK So
Matenal
SOJld
I DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS WELL WAS CONSTR
STANDARDS. ANO THAT A COPY OF THIS RECORD H
I
I
I
I
I
GW·1 REVISED 2190
DATE
Submit original to Division of Environmental Management and copy to well owner .•
I
I
I
r-iQRTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT. HEALTH AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF ENVIROHUENTAL MANAGEMENT • GROUNDWATER SECTlON
P.O. BOX 27687 • RALE1GH. NC 27611-7687
PHONE {919}7'33·3221
WELL CONSTRUCTION RECORD
I DRILLING coNTRAcToR LClw B\910eeno9 I DRILLER REGISTRATION NUMBER "332-
I
\. WELL LOCATION: (Show sketch of the location below)
~earest Town RfJJc'i .AA.ovnt Nurih (UO\l(lC\.
·:Roaa. Commumty. or Subdivision and Lot No.)
I 2 OWNER CONOW :r:iJL-·
A D D R E s s _ ____,_r;:_o-.'-'' o'-',~"'0--1-__,_1 "'( o;;:;o::-:N7o,.,.r t:.,IJ,..,tu.~i~r 'fi:---'A_,_..;,"-n"'}.:..:vt'-iL __
11..-.n, > lStreet or Route No.J
I
I
I
I
I
1 ov-':>\Dn n 77079
City or Town
DATE DRILLED ii/Z9194
o.1 TOTAL DEPTH 22 -teet
State Zio Code
usE oF wELL G-W MOI\dortns
CUTTINGS COLLECTED l8:J Yes 0 No
5. DOES WELL REPLACE EXISTING WELL? 0 Yes .8J No
6. STATIC WATER LEVEL' \tj,e,t FT. 0 above TOP OF CASING. (!. below
TOP OF CASING IS -D•'i-0 FT. ABOVE LAND SURFACE.
7. YIELD (gpm), --'-'(\J"-f'r;..._ ___ METHOD OF TEST _;1V_:_:_(\-____ _
8. WATER ZONES (depth): _...otJ.:..:..:tr ____________ _
9. CHLORINATION: Type r.iir Amount
tO. CASING: Wall Thickness
DePth Diameter or We•ghtiFt. Matenal
From 0 To 22 Ft. 21 0(1\ ~CH40 PVC
:=rom To Ft.
From To Fl.
11. GROUT'
Matenal Method
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
Quad. No.------Serial No.----
Lat. Lono. Pc __
Minor Basin-------------
Basin Code-------------
Header Ent. GW-1 Ent.
STATE WELL CONSTRUCTION NA
PERMIT NUMBER:
Deeth
From To
SH
S'izfl 10fl
iSH
2.0H
DRILLING LOG
FormatiOn Descnption
Sti (l i'ed br1)W~ ~(% ~~~~ LU\l{
e fir"' WhiH C1r
\C.O~? -iutl (Jif1l( f\rU' -DW1ljwvt
SAN?
ll additional soace is needed use back of form.
LOCATION SKETCH
(Show direction and distance from at least two State Roads.
or other mao reference oo•nts)
I
Depth
From _O::.___To '3,"1 F .. -'-N'-'I:::IJJ...::C~I m~<.:.:.n .:__t llemie.-pire
D
I
I
I , I
I
I
From ____ To ___ Ft. ------
12. SCREEN:
t3.
14.
Depth Diameter Slot Size Matenal
From 1 To 21-Fl. 2-in. 0.010 in. pyc_
From To ___ Fl. •n. in.
From To Fl. !n. •n.
GRAVEL PACK:
Depth Size Matenal
From s To n. Ft. fill~ (lit) ~Md
From To ___ Fl.
REMARKS:
1 DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS WELL WAS CONSTR
ST ANOAROS. AND THAT A COPY OF THIS RECORD HA
DATE
GW·1 REVISED 2190 Submit anginal to Division of Environmental Manaoement and copy to well owner.
NORTH CAROLINA OEPARl'UENT OF ENVIRONMENT, HEALnt AND NATIJRAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF EHYIRONIIENTAL MANAGEMENT • GROUNDWATER SECTION
P.O. BOX 27A7· RALEIGH. NC 27611·7687
PHONE (919)133·3221
WELL CONSTRUCTION RECORD
DRILLING coNTRAcToR Lu.w (ng1oeennq
DRILLER REGISTRATION NUMBER :Bz
1. WELL LOCATION: (Show sketcn at the 1ocanon below)
Nearest Town: ROCNJ Movl\t 1 Mldh CwtJ\ItW--
~Roao. Communny, or Subdivis1on and Lot No.)
2 owNER CoND:.v sn~·
.ADDREss P0101Z.0 (;DO N lf(rf\ -vcur~ A:,hlul~
1J.....-,,t.J-1 lStreel or Route N .) 9 riD"--'tCYI =fX 7707
City or Town State Zip Code
Atw-s
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
Quad. No.------Serial No.----
Lat. ______ Lono. ----Pc __
Minor Basin-------------
Basin Code-------------
Header Ent.
STATE WELL CONSTRUCTION NA
PERMIT NUMBER:
GW-1 Ent.
countv t:=dgeccm be,
Deeth DRILLING LOG
From To I '" Formation Oescriotion
?''z{f <-;,{1
3 'I f . <!. j 10 fl.
I
I
I
I
I
I
IJ>''z It iSH.
, :ATE DRILLED ~~~~q j<J4 USE OF WELL c.w J\AOr\ifurtll@
21-feet CUTTINGS COLLECTED Q1:l Yes 0 No J iOTAL DEPTH Ck~ '-'<1 'W _Slllhl Sill I
1\\C(l\~A) ~10-li\Cti Si\NQ 5. DOES WELL REPLACE EXISTING WELL? 0 Yes KJ No
5. STATIC WATER LEVEL: 1'!>.'/.-'l--FT. 0 above TOP OF CASING.
n ~below ·
TOP OF CASING IS ~o•·o!J-FT. ABOVE LAND SURFACE.
7. YIELD (gpm ): ....c:Nc:.ft-:_ ___ METHOD OF TEST -'-i\J..:.(\--;_ ___ _
8. WATER ZONES (death): __ i,__,N..:.i\-;_ ___________ _
9. ·cHLORINATION: Type i\i~ Amount
10.
"-
CASING:
From 0
rrom
From
GROUT:
Depth
Wall Thickness Diameter or We1gnt1Ft.
To 21 -='--Ft. lif\ch SCH 40
To ___ ft. __ _
To ---Fl.----
Material
Matenal Pvc
Method Depth
From ---'0'---To Q•I.J F .. -'-N'-"ea1=-. .::c e::.!rlw:.:.-11!.-'-t-_ J(em~e.. p, ~e.
From ____ To ___ F!. _____ _
i2. SCREEN:
Deotn
From __::.b __ To 2.1
Diameter Slot Size
Ft.__,2.~_;n. 0.010 ;n.
From ----To ___ Ft. ___ 1n in.
From To Ft. ___ ,n. ___ ,n.
13. GRAVEL PACK:
Material
WL
Material oeotn Size
From__,4c..___To 21 Ft. Hne (Iii) ~MO
From ____ To ___ Ft. _____ _
15'iz.f1 t.G ff
If additionat so ace IS needed use back of form.
LOCATION SKETCH
(Show direction and distance lrom at least two State Roads.
or other mao reference oomts l
see s1-te pi(itl
I
I
I
I
I
I
I 14. REMARKS: _______________________________________________________________ _
STANDARDS. ANO THAT A COPY OF THIS RECORD EEN 0 EQ'Tq;JHE §IJtOI)'!IEJI. , _,;--
I DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS WELL WAS CONST CTEO ~N CCORDAN. CE_ WITH t5 NCAC 2C. WELL CONSTRUCTION
'/d : !-(/,'\;, f/j f/1 [7. 7-? f!J I
GW·' REVISED 2190 Submit ongtnal to Division of Environmental Management and copy to well owner. I
-----------,=cc==----
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Conoco Store No. 33047-Comprehensive Site Assessment Report
Law Engineering Project 56-4533
APPENDIXD
February 6, 1995
Final
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL DATA FOR SOIL AND CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY
RECORDS
---· ·-··
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I I '
August 15, 1994
Sharon Tyndall
Law Environmental, Inc.
2801 Yorkmont Rd.
Charlotte, NC 28208
LAW
ENGINEERING AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
Subject: Chemical analysis of samples received on 08/09/94
Project Number: 56-4533
Dear Ms. Tyndall:
Law Environmental National Laboratories has completed its analysis of your samples and reports
the results on the following pages. These results relate only to the contents of the samples as
submitted. This report shall not be reproduced except in full without the approval of Law
Environmental National Laboratories.
If there are any questions, please do not hesitate to contact us.
Sincerely,
LAW ENVIRONMENTAL NATIONAL LABORATORIES
px._~ ~
Patrick Kelley
Hydrocarbon-Supervisor
PK:so
Enclosures: Data Report
Invoice
LAW ENVIRONMENTAL, INC.
NATIONAL LABORATORIES
112 TOWN PARK DRIVE • KENNESAW, GA 30144
[phone] • FAX [phone]
ONE Of 'OlE LAW COMPAHIES (i}
Date
Page
08/16/94
1
Lab Number
Project No.
Project Name
Manager:
Station ID
Matrix
Type
Collector
Remarks
LAW ENVIRONMENTAL NATIONAL LABORATORIES
TEST DATA REPORT
64-8722-15
56-4533
CONOCO #33047
SHARON TYNDALL
GP-1 (4-5')
so
GRAB
RTB
---Project Information ---
Cust. No.
---Sample Information ---
Sampled Date/Time
Received Date/Time
Received From/By
Chain of Custody
Number of Containers
---Test Data ---
08/07/94 13:00
08/09/94 08:53
RTB/JA
0
1
Parameter .............................. Method .... Units PQL ....... Results ... Test Date
--SAMPLE PREPARATION RESULTS
Moisture (oven dried @lOSe)
--TPH-VOLATILE ANALYSIS RESULTS
TPH-Volatile
D2216M wt.% 1
5030/8015M mg/kg 5
16 08/11/94 TH
ND 08/11/94 TH
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Date 08/16/94
Page 1
Lab Number
Project No.
Project Name
LAW ENVIRONMENTAL NATIONAL LABORATORIES
TEST DATA REPORT
64-8722-16
56-4533
CONOCO #33047
---Project Information ---
Cust. No.
Manager: SHARON TYNDALL
Station ID
Matrix
Type
Collector
Remarks
GP-1 ( 9-10')
so
GRAB
RTB
---Sample Information ---
Sampled Date/Time
Received Date/Time
Received From/By
Chain of Custody
Number of Containers
---Test Data ---
08/07/94 13:05
08/09/94 08:53
RTB/JA
0
1
I Parameter .............................. Method .... Units PQL ....... Results ... Teat Date Analy
I
I
I
I
R
I
I
I
--SAMPLE PREPARATION RESULTS
Moisture (oven dried @lOSe)
--TPH-VOLATILE ANALYSIS RESULTS
TPH-Volatile
D2216M wt.% 1 23 08/11/94 TH
5030/8015M mg/kg 5 ND 08/11/94 TH
Signed ~uC,.
Date
Page
08/16/94
1
Lab Number
Project No.
Project Name
Manager:
Station ID
Matrix
Type
Collector
Remarks
LAW ENVIRONMENTAL NATIONAL LABORATORIES
TEST DATA REPORT
64-8722-17
56-4533
CONOCO #33047
SHARON TYNDALL
GP-2 (4-5')
so
GRAB
RTB
---Project Information ---
Cust. No.
---Sample Information ---
Sampled Date/Time
Received Date/Time
Received From/By
Chain of Custody
Number of Containers
---Test Data ---
I
I
I
I
I
08/07/94 12:20
08/09/94 08:53 I RTB/JA
0
1 I
I
Parameter .............................. Method .... Units PQL •••••.. Results •.. Test Date Anal~~
--SAMPLE PREPARATION RESULTS
Moisture (oven dried @lOSe)
--TPH-VOLATILE ANALYSIS RESULTS
TPH-Volatile
D2216M wt.% 1 20
5030/8015M mg/kg 5 ND
Signed '/ir;t-I ~
08/11/94 TH I
08/11/94 TH I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Date 08/16/94
Page 1
Lab Number
Project No.
Project Name
LAW ENVIRONMENTAL NATIONAL LABORATORIES
TEST DATA REPORT
64-8722-18
56-4533
CONOCO #33047
---Project Information ---
Cust. No.
Manager: SHARON TYNDALL
Station IO
Matrix
Type
Collector
Remarks
GP-2 (9-10')
so
GRAB
RTB
---Sample Information ---
Sampled Date/Time
Received Date/Time
Received From/By
Chain of Custody
Number of Containers
---Test Data ---
08/07/94 12:25
08/09/94 08:53
RTB/JA
0
1
I Parameter ...•.......•••.......•........ Method ..•• Units PQL ....... Results ... Test Date Analy
I
I
I
I
I
I
--SAMPLE PREPARATION RESULTS
Moisture (oven dried @lOSe)
--TPH-VOLATILE ANALYSIS RESULTS
TPH-Volatile
D2216M wt.% 1 7.9 08/11/94 TH
5030/8015M mg/kg 5 NO 08/11/94 TH
Signed
Date 08/16/94
Page 1
Lab Number
Project No.
Project Name
LAW ENVIRONMENTAL NATIONAL LABORATORIES
TEST DATA REPORT
64-8722-19
56-4533
CONOCO #33047
---Project Information ---
Cust. No.
Manager: SHARON TYNDALL
station ID
Matrix
Type
Collector
Remarks
GP-3 (4-5')
so
GRAB
RTB
---Sample Information ---
Sampled Date/Time
Received Date/Time
Received From/By
Chain of Custody
Number of Containers
*THE CHROMATOGRAM IS IN THE RANGE OF DIESEL WITH HEAVIER
CONSTITUENTS.
---Test Data ---
08/07/94 11:00
08/09/94 08:53
RTB/JA
0
2
Parameter .............................. Method .... Units PQL ....... Results ... Test Date
--SAMPLE PREPARATION RESULTS
EXT/TPH-Semi-Volatile/So/ EPA 3550M NA 08/10/94 JMK
Moisture (oven dried @lOSe) D2216M wt.% 1 16 08/10/94 JMK
--TPH-VOLATILE ANALYSIS RESULTS
TPH-Volatile 5030/8015M mg/kg 5 NO 08/12/94 TH
--TPH-SEMI-VOLATILE I PAH ANALYSIS RESULTS
TPH-Semi-Volatile EPA 8015M mg/kg 10 82• 08/10/94 TH
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Date 08/16/94
Page 1
Lab Number
Project No.
Project Name
LAW ENVIRONMENTAL NATIONAL LABORATORIES
TEST DATA REPORT
64-8722-20
56-4533
CONOCO #33047
---Project Information ---
Cuat. No.
Manager: SHARON TYNDALL
Station ID
Matrix
Type
Collector
Remarks
GP-3 ( 9-10')
so
GRAB
RTB
---Sample Information ---
Sampled Date/Time
Received Date/Time
Received From/By
Chain of Custody
Number of Containers
---Test Data ---
08/07/94
08/09/94
RTB/JA
0
2
11:05
08:53
II Parameter .............................. Method .... Units PQL ....... Results ... Test Date Analy
--SAMPLE PREPARATION RESULTS
I EXT/TPH-Semi-VolatilefSof EPA 3550M NA 08/10/94 JMK
Moisture (oven dried @lOSe) D2216M wt.% 1 19 08/10/94 JMK
--TPH-VOLATILE ANALYSIS RESULTS
TPH-Volatile 5030/8015M mgfkg 5 ND 08/12/94 TH I
--TPH-SEMI-VOLATILE I PAH ANALYSIS RESULTS
I TPH-Semi-Volatile EPA 8015M mgfkg 10 ND 08/10/94 TH
I
I
I
I
I
signed ylr..,...L. /(ab~
Date
Page
08/16/94
1
Lab Number
Project No.
Project Name
LAW ENVIRONMENTAL NATIONAL LABORATORIES
TEST DATA REPORT
64-8722-01
56-4533
CONOCO #33047
---Project Information ---
Cust. No.
Manager: SHARON TYNDALL
Station ID
Matrix
Type
Collector
Remarks
GP-4 (4-5')
so
GRAB
RTB
---Sample Information ---
Sampled Date/Time
Received Date/Time
Received From/By
Chain of C~stody
Number of Containers
J
---Test Data ---
08/06/94 16:00
08/09/94 08:53
RTB/JA
0
1
Parameter .............................. Method .... Units PQL ....... Results ... Test Date
--SAMPLE PREPARATION RESULTS
Moisture {oven dried @lOSe)
--TPH-VOLATILE ANALYSIS RESULTS
TPH-Volatile
D2216M wt.% 1
5030/8015M mgfkg 5
20 08/11/94 TH
ND 08/11/94 TH
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Date 08/16/94
Page 1
Lab Number
Project No.
Project Name
LAW ENVIRONMENTAL NATIONAL LABORATORIES
TEST DATA REPORT
64-8722-02
56-4533
CONOCO #33047
---Project Information ---
Cust. No.
Manager: SHARON TYNDALL
Station ID
Matrix
Type
Collector
Remarks
GP-4 ( 9-10')
so
GRAB
RTB
---Sample Information ---
Sampled Date/Time
Received Date/Time
Received From/By
Chain of Custody
Number of Containers
---Test Data ---
08/06/94
08/09/94
RTB/JA
0
1
16:05
08:53
I Parameter .............................. Method .... Units PQL ....... Results ... Test Date Analy
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
--SAMPLE PREPARATION RESULTS
Moisture (oven dried @lOSe)
--TPH-VOLATILE ANALYSIS RESULTS
TPH-Vo1atile
D2216M wt.% 1 17 08/11/94 TH
5030/8015M mgfkg 5 ND 08/11/94 TH
Signed {2C:;.Jv.._ #Lt<~--
Date
Page
08/16/94
1
Lab Number
Project No.
Project Name
LAW ENVIRONMENTAL NATIONAL LABORATORIES
TEST DATA REPORT
64-8722-03
56-4533
CONOCO #33047
---Project Information ---
Cust. No.
Manager: SHARON TYNDALL
Station ID
Matrix
Type
Collector
Remarks
GP-5 (4-5')
so
GRAB
RTB
---Sample Information ---
Sampled Date/Time
Received Date/Time
Received From/By
Chain of Custody
Number of Containers
*THE CHROMATOGRAM IS IN THE RANGE OF DIESEL WITH HEAVIER
CONSTITUENTS.
---Test Data ---
I
I
I
I
I
08/06/94 14:30
08/09/94 08:53 I RTB/JA
0
2 I
I
Parameter. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Method. . . . Units PQL .....•• Results ... Teat Date
--SAMPLE PREPARATION RESULTS
EXT/TPH-Semi-Volatile(So/
Moisture (oven dried @lOSe)
--TPH-VOLATILE ANALYSIS RESULTS
TPH-Volatile
EPA 3550M
D2216M wt.% 1
5030/8015M mgfkg 5
--TPH-SEMI-VOLATILE / PAH ANALYSIS RESULTS
TPH-Semi-Volatile EPA 8015M mg/kg 10
NA
24
ND
10*
08/10/94 JMK I
08/10/94 JMK
08/11/94 TH I
08/10/94 TH I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I Date
Page
.I
',
I
I
I
I
I
08/16/94
1
Lab Number
Project No.
Project Name
Manager:
Station ID
Matrix
Type
Collector
Remarks
LAW ENVIRONMENTAL NATIONAL LABORATORIES
TEST DATA REPORT
64-8722-04
56-4533
CONOCO #33047
SHARON TYNDALL
GP-5 ( 9-10')
so
GRAB
RTB
---Project Information ---
Cuat. No.
---Sample Information ---
Sampled Date/Time
Received Date/Time
Received From/By
Chain of Custody
Number of Containers
---Test Data ---
08/06/94
08/09/94
RTB/JA
0
2
14:35
08:53
I Parameter .............................. Method .... Units PQL ....... Results ... Test Date Analy
--SAMPLE PREPARATION RESULTS
I EXT/TPH-Semi-VolatilefSof EPA 3550M NA 08/10/94 JMK
Moisture (oven dried @lOSe) D2216M wt.% 1 17 08/10/94 JMK
--TPH-VOLATILE ANALYSIS RESULTS
I TPH-Volatile 5030/8015M mgfkg 5 ND 08/11/94 TH
--TPH-SEMI-VOLATILE I PAH ANALYSIS RESULTS
TPH-Semi-Volatile EPA 8015M
( I mg/kg 10 ND 08/10/94 TH
I
I
I
I
I
Signed
Date 08/16/94
Page 1
Lab Number
Project No.
Project Name
LAW ENVIRONMENTAL NATIONAL LABORATORIES
TEST DATA REPORT
64-8722-05
56-4533
CONOCO #33047
---Project Information ---
Cust. No.
Manager: SHARON TYNDALL
Station ID
Matrix
Type
Collector
Remarks
GP-6 (4-5')
so
GRAB
RTB
---Sample Information ---
Sampled Date/Time
Received Date/Time
Received From/By
Chain of Custody
Number of Containers
---Test Data ---
08/06/94 13:30
08/09/94 08:53
RTB/JA
0
1
Parameter. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Method. . . . Units PQL ....... Results ... Test Date
--SAMPLE PREPARATION RESULTS
Moisture (oven dried @lOSe)
--TPH-VOLATILE ANALYSIS RESULTS
TPH-Volatile
D2216M wt.% 1 17
5030/8015M mg/kg 5 NO
Signed ~L.., "lt'T
08/11/94 TH
08/11/94 TH
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Date 08/16/94
Page 1
Lab Number
Project No.
Project Name
LAW ENVIRONMENTAL NATIONAL LABORATORIES
TEST DATA REPORT
64-8722-06
56-4533
CONOCO #33047
---Project Information ---
Cust. No.
Manager: SHARON TYNDALL
Station ID
Matrix
Type
Collector
Remarks
GP-6 (9-10')
so
GRAB
RTB
---Sample Information ---
Sampled Date/Time
Received Date/Time
Received From/By
Chain of Custody
Number of Containers
---Test Data ---
08/06/94 13:35
08/09/94 08:53
RTB/JA
0
1
I Parameter .............................. Method .... Units PQL ....... Results ... Test Date Analy
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
--SAMPLE PREPARATION RESULTS
Moisture (oven dried @lOSe)
--TPH-VOLATILE ANALYSIS RESULTS
TPH-Volatile
D2216M wt.% 1 19 08/11/94 TH
5030/8015M mg/kg 5 NO 08/11/94 TH
Signed
'<·:!' •\:
i
Date
Page
08/16/94
1
Lab Number
Project No.
Project Name
LAW ENVIRONMENTAL NATIONAL LABORATORIES
TEST DATA REPORT
64-8722-07
56-4533
CONOCO #33047
---Project Information ---
Cust. No.
Manager: SHARON TYNDALL
Station ID
Matrix
Type
Collector
Remarks
GP-7 (4-5')
so
GRAB
RTB
---Sample Information ---
Sampled Date/Time
Received Date/Time
Received From/By
Chain of Custody
Number of Containers
---Test Data ---
I
I
I
I
I
08/06/94 08:30
08/09/94 08:53 I RTB/JA
0
1
I
I
Parameter. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Method. . . . Units PQL ....... Results •.. Test Date Anal'
--SAMPLE PREPARATION RESULTS
Moisture (oven dried @lOSe)
--TPH-VOLATILE ANALYSIS RESULTS
TPH-Volatile
D2216M wt.% 1
5030/8015M mgfkg 5
Signed
18
ND
08/11/94 TH I
08/11/94 TH
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Date
Page
08/16/94
1
Lab Number
Project No.
Project Name
LAW ENVIRONMENTAL NATIONAL LABORATORIES
TEST DATA REPORT
64-8722-08
56-4533
CONOCO #33047
---Project Information ---
Cust. No.
Manager: SHARON TYNDALL
Station ID
Matrix
Type
Collector
Remarks
GP-7 (9-10')
so
GRAB
RTB
---Sample Information ---
Sampled Date/Time
Received Date/Time
Received From/By
Chain of Custody
Number of Containers
---Test Data ---
08/06/94 08:35
08/09/94 08:53
RTB/JA
0
1
II Parameter .............................. Method .... Units PQL ....... Results ... Test Date Analy
--SAMPLE PREPARATION RESULTS
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Moisture (oven dried @lOSe)
--TPH-VOLATILE ANALYSIS RESULTS
TPH-Volatile
D2216M wt.'t 1 14 08/11/94 TH
5030/8015M mgfkg 5 ND 08/11/94 TH
Signed
<;jl .. ,.I
'
Date 08/16/94
Page 1
Lab Number
Project No.
Project Name
LAW ENVIRONMENTAL NATIONAL LABORATORIES
TEST DATA REPORT
64-8722-09
56-4533
CONOCO #33047
---Project Information ---
Cust. No.
Manager: SHARON TYNDALL
Station ID
Matrix
Type
Collector
Remarks
GP-8 (4-5')
so
GRAB
RTB
---sample Information ---
Sampled Date/Time
Received Date/Time
Received From/By
Chain of Custody
Number of Containers
---Test Data ---
08/06/94 09:20
08/09/94 08:53
RTB/JA
0
1
Parameter .............................. Method .... Units PQL ....... Results ... Test Date
--SAMPLE PREPARATION RESULTS
Moisture (oven dried @lOSe)
--TPH-VOLATILE ANALYSIS RESULTS
TPH-Volatile
D2216M wt.% 1
5030/8015M mgjkg 5
Signed
19 08/11/94 TH
ND 08/11/94 TH
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Date
Page
08(16/94
1
Lab Number
Project No.
Project Name
LAW ENVIRONMENTAL NATIONAL LABORATORIES
TEST DATA REPORT
64-8722-10
56-4533
CONOCO #33047
---Project Information ---
Cuat. No.
Manager: SHARON TYNDALL
Station ID
Matrix
Type
Collector
Remarks
GP-8 (9-10')
so
GRAB
RTB
---Sample Information ---
Sampled Date/Time
Received Date/Time
Received From/By
Chain of Custody
Number of Containers
---Test Data ---
08/06/94 09:25
08/09/94 08:53
RTB/JA
0
1
I Parameter .............................. Method .... Units PQL ....... Results ... Test Date Analy
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
--SAMPLE PREPARATION RESULTS
Moisture (oven dried @lOSe)
--TPH-VOLATILE ANALYSIS RESULTS
TPH-Volatile
D2216M wt.% 1 9.3 08/11/94 TH
5030/8015M mg/kg 5 NO 08/11/94 TH
Signed
:.,.I' ''.--.
i
Date
Page
08/16/94
1
Lab Number
Project No.
Project Name
LAW ENVIRONMENTAL NATIONAL LABORATORIES
TEST DATA REPORT
64-8722-11
56-4533
CONOCO #33047
---Project Information ---
Cust. No.
Manager: SHARON TYNDALL
Station ID
Matrix
Type
Collector
Remarks
GP-9 ( 4-5')
so
GRAB
RTB
---Sample Information ---
Sampled Date/Time
Received Date/Time
Received From/By
Chain of Custody
Number of Containers
---Test Data ---
08/06/94 10:30
08/09/94 08:53
RTB/JA
0
1
Parameter .............................. Method .... Units PQL ....... Results ... Test Date
--SAMPLE PREPARATION RESULTS
Moisture (oven dried @lOSe}
--TPH-VOLATILE ANALYSIS RESULTS
TPH-Volati1e
D2216M wt.% 1
5030/8015M mg/kg 5
Signed
20 08/11/94 TH
ND 08/11/94 TH
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Date
Page
08/16/94
1
Lab Number
Project No.
Project Name
LAW ENVIRONMENTAL NATIONAL LABORATORIES
TEST DATA REPORT
64-8722-12
56-4533
CONOCO #33047
---Project Information ---
Cust. No.
Manager: SHARON TYNDALL
Station ID
Matrix
Type
Collector
Remarks
GP-9 ( 9-10' )
so
GRAB
RTB
---Sample Information ---
Sampled Date/Time
Received Date/Time
Received From/By
Chain of Custody
Number of Containers
---Teat Data ---
08/06/94 10:35
08/09/94 08:53
RTB/JA
0
1
I Parameter .............................. Method .... Units PQL ....... Results ... Test Date Analy
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
--SAMPLE PREPARATION RESULTS
Moisture (oven dried @lOSe)
--TPH-VOLATILE ANALYSIS RESULTS
TPH-Volatile
D2216M wt.% 1 8.3 08/11/94 TH
5030/8015M mg/kg 5 ND 08/11/94 TH
.:~'~'\i ..
I
Date
Page
08/16/94
1
Lab Number
Project No.
Project Name
LAW ENVIRONMENTAL NATIONAL LABORATORIES
TEST DATA REPORT
64-8722-13
56-4533
CONOCO #33047
---Project Information ---
Cust. No.
Manager: SHARON TYNDALL
Station ID
Matrix
Type
Collector
Remarks
GP-10 ( 4-5')
so
GRAB
RTB
---Sample Information ---
Sampled Date/Time
Received Date/Time
Received From/By
Chain of Custody
Number of Containers
---Test Data ---
I
I
I
I
I
08/06/94 12:30
08/09/94 08:53 I RTB/JA
0
1 I
I
Parameter .............................. Method .... Units PQL ....... Results ... Test Date Analt
--SAMPLE PREPARATION RESULTS
Moisture {oven dried @lOSe)
--TPH-VOLATILE ANALYSIS RESULTS
TPH-Volatile
D2216M wt.% 1 20
5030/8015M mg/kg 5 NO
08/11/94 TH I
08/11/94 TH I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Date
Page
08/16/94
1
Lab Number
Project No.
Project Name
LAW ENVIRONMENTAL NATIONAL LABORATORIES
TEST DATA REPORT
64-8722-14
56-4533
CONOCO #33047
---Project Information ---
Cust. No.
Manager: SHARON TYNDALL
Station ID
Matrix
Type
Collector
Remarks
GP-10 ( 9-10')
so
GRAB
RTB
---Sample Information ---
Sampled Date/Time
Received Date/Time
Received From/By
Chain of Custody
Number of Containers
---Test Data ---
08/06/94 12:35
08/09/94 08:53
RTB/JA
0
1
I Parameter .............................. Method .... Units PQL ....... Results ... Test Date Analy
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.I II
--SAMPLE PREPARATION RESULTS
Moisture (oven dried @lOSe}
--TPH-VOLATILE ANALYSIS RESULTS
TPH-Volatile
D2216M wt.% 1 7.8 08/11/94 TH
5030/8015M mg/kg 5 ND 08/11/94 TH
Signed
LAW ENGINEERING
5710 OLEANDER DRIVE
SUITE110
CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD
Wlli~INGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28403
(91 0) 452·1185
FAX [phone]
SAMPLING
INFORMATION
114 ~ 0 ~0 G-P -5 ( l( I -'3' ) l
lYro " ~" IG-: -5 ( Ll '-s') I
NAME OF FACILITY: ( ()/li>C()Yf:_ ~:s 04-]
sTREET ADDREss: U~.J. tJ~~ ~.,._1eiif 'S+
CITY/STATE: Rec G M;v/I£}JC ZIP': 1)5'/?o(
-a 2.
llf3S 1' <;o6-V-5(Cl 1 -l~') I I --o,;
fl-l ~.J....,!~~ 51\-BI--~~"'-t--r:-G-;-P.-------=-=c;~(r?<.: q.--1_--,-l O-::-=:-').---+-'---l-t-t--t--t-+-t--+--t-t--t--t-t-t--t-t--t-:-l-t--t--t--t-+-t-t--1 -ot;,f
l3'30 h ~ G-D -h(lf'-S') J I -as
AA
RECEIV£0 BY: RELINQUISHED BY:
{SIGNATURE) (SIGNATURE)
RELINQUISHEd av: DATE/TIME RECEIVED BY: RELINQUISHED BY:
(SIGNATURE) I (SIGNATURE) {SIGNATURE}
DISTRIBUTION:
REMARKS: -
DATE/TIME RECEIVED BY1
I {SIGNATURE)
.--?f"'!E/TIME RECIEVED .'jtT ~ABORA"'JRY: ~f(( 1{)553 I"' M c..--zr,rz:..' r ': ) (SIGNATURE)
'"SOURCII
CODES:
RECOVERY WELL· RW
RCRA MONITORING WELL· MW
SOIL/SEDIMENT· SO
SLUDGE-SL
NPDES DISCHARGE· NO
DRINKING WATER· OW
HAZARDOUS WASTE· HW
-._,.CE-R----
~~ Iiiii --- - - - - - - --__ ..,. __ LAW ENGINEERING CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD fj ~ ov-Lj
5710 OLEANDER DRIVE
SUITE110
WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28403
.---------------------~~~~~~~~------. NAME OF FACILITY: lfilll<JC(J :t;t: ~ 3 b4 ~ SAMPLING
INFORMATION
(91 0) 452-1185
FAX [phone]
sTREET AooR.g;s: i \ :::!~ Npr~t._ _&I e~ s+.
r;,cr-1(72'2---ciTY/STATE: ___!i_~ MouAt-. N(. z1~: d_7JiOJ
RELINQUISH~BY: DATE/TIME
{SIGNATURE) I
RECEIVED BY: RELINQUISHED BY: DATE/TIME RECIEVED A1\_LABORATORY:
{SIGNATURE)
-----=-=~c=--ll,{?hyjo8n"-p,., -"' -,/,h-~ ~-~?s/
(SIGNATURE} ;-'(t: ___)__ {SIGNATURq
•soURCI:
TAINED BY SAMPLERS. CODES:
RECOVERY WELL· RW
RCRA MONITORING WELL-MW
SOIL/SEDIMENT· SO
SLUDGE· SL
NPOES DISCHARGE-NO
DRINKING WATER-OW
HAZARDOUS WASTE-HW
SURFACE WATER-SW
-
TIME
\045
II c
0:
"
~~~:lt\
LAW ENGINEERING
5710 OLEANDER DRIVE
SUITE110
WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 26403
[phone]
FAX [phone]
t,-_" y 'f* ~ llj_ ~'(Ti/TIME
(SIGri ATURE) l•qilllt57
RELINQUISHED BY! DATE/TIME
(SIGNATURE) I
REMARKS: -
CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD P03of i
SAMPLING
INFORMATION
RECEIVED BY:
(SIGNATURE)
RECEIVED BY:
(SIGNATURE)
NAME OF FACILITY: _L.&1_0_w_ # 3 30'-/]_
STREET ADDRE);S: \ \ :;l, :?. N.) r-{i, IV>.~ <:;;'f
CITY/STATE: flu(W /L1;;,/!L_J:)_L Zl~: <-<7160{
RELINQU ISHEO BY;
(SIGNATURE}
RELINQUISHED BY:
{SIGNATURE)
ll
DATE/TIME RECEIVED BY1
I {SIGNATURE)
*SOURCI:
CODES:
RECOVERY WELL· RW
RCRA MONITORING WELL· MW
SOIL/SEDIMENT-SO
SLUDGE-SL
NPDES DISCHARGE-NO
DRINKING WATER-OW
HAZARDOUS WASTE-HW
-~CE-R----
iiiil -------- --LAW ENGINEERING
5710 OLEANDER DRIVE
SUITE 110
CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD
WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28403
'[phone]
SAMPLING
INFORMATION
FAX [phone]V-S 12-Z-
I
Is
RECEIVED BY:
{SIGNATURE)
RELINQUISHED fly; DATE/TIM£ RECEIVED BY:
{SIGNATURE) I (SIGNATURE)
REMARKS:
NAME OF FACILITY: ( Ml. :.0 'ff= S '3C)lJ-:J
STREET ADDR~S: I I c A Nru-t\, (~c..l.e-!<;.(, <>'h.
CITY/STATE: ~.:k:H. J!JJ_~ {\J(_ VZII':;). 790(
RELINQUISHED BY:
(SIGNATURE)
RELINQUISHED BY;
(SIGNATURE)
-17
-IS
J --1'1
~;c;
I -z.;;
\ _-z_ u
-z 7
-2 :;/
-z_ '/
DATE/TIME RECEIVED BY1
l (SIGNATURE)
DATE/TIME RECIEVED ATA LABORATORY: <tJ,~vj , .. ~ o lb~ w1JI.iC..1' 'f1flt '1. 'iJ b j_ {SIGNATURE)
RECOVERY WELL· RW
• SOURC&
CODES:
RCRA MONITORING WELL-MW
SOIL/SEDIMENT· SO
SLUDGE-SL
NPDES DISCHARGE· NO
DRINKING WATER· OW
HAZARDOUS WASTE-HW
SURFACE WATER -SW
-
SAMPLE RECEIPT RECORD
SAMPLING
INFORMATION
NPDES NUMBER
PROJECT NAM~~6eo 4{ 3Xf/1 I J5-b~5>J
ls;sAOJMMP;;:LEERRS~ISit;le~r~4A~T~U~~~~--:::; .?~--~~.r~?:__~~-A---'---"-:_::--=--=--~ ~
, __________ -;f-L"TL--~/-~~--~-~~'-'~---------lg~ ,_ ~ «:
SAMPLING DATE v-_ / _ f· / ;"' ~
~-----,--,-7T---,~D~~~~~y-----------------l~8 ~ ~ •SOJRC£
CODE TIME SAMPLE STATION DESCRIPTION
"' 8
lx l.z.-
NAME OF FACILITY: ----------------------
STREET ADDRESS:
LENL LAB NO.
RECEIVED BY LABORATOAY: • DAT~E I TIME
~~-.Lb_-L_-'--'G"'f ~ 211lS<;3
' -) (SIGNATURE) I~ ....
8/%}":
-------------------
PROJ(lT NAME
"t<,._ "'·
----------LAW ENVIRONMENTAL, INC.
NATIONAL LABORATORY
SAMPLE RECEIPT RECORD
112 TOWN PARK DRIVE SAMPLING NAME OF FACILITY: KENNESAW, GEORGIA 30144 INFORMATION
[phone] r:'(-pz,-z_, NPDES NUMBER STREET ADDRESS:
~u:. # 3:::f(N·? J J~lo. -.2"2"3-3 f<, ~<., ~'l."' ~~~
----
SAMPLERS !SIGNAl! IRE~-•""J-<f..:<'~ ~"' Oa: i<.,'<-'l.V'" ~c. ""!iii ""'""' ~ "'" s '< " ~~ «""' & ~'\ ~ ¢~ ~'b,~ c:i~ <:::::_.~ sS ~~ ~ ""(Q ~(Q~ ~\;;)"' Sc::, is-{,'f "'r:Q 'I} z-
SAMPLING DATE ~"' ~~~~,, ~~~~~ ~ 8-7-'fV "' .... ,_z oo
" " 'l' 'l' " <;,,0 <Q ~ .. . " " "
e-'-'
~ "' ·sruRCE SAMPLE STATION DESCRIPTION ~ ~ ~ <:, «" q'-' <( ......, <X'-' ~-$'. 'i:::-() o'"v :>v· :\.· :>v· o"'" LENL LAB NO. TIME "' "' ~ ~ ,v ,"-" ,-v ,-..... ,v ,..S ,'v ~ -<....~ "'::'\. t:t:Jo ~o '\.c '1>. a: 0 CODE "' u
/IOD :X (,J ;f &i.voa:-0 z... ""2..-&-!-'67'Z¥)i
RECEIVED BY LABOAAT~ DATE I TIME
~.u..v.o .J. _,.\, v:J.7!1t.J ~vla55J ~-(SIGNATURE)
-
i li
ll
LAW ENVIRONMENTAL, INC . SAMPLE RECEIPT RECORD
•
NATIONAL LABORATORY
112 TOWNPARK DRIVE
KENNESAW, GEORGIA 30144
[phone]
SAMPLE STATION DESCRIPTION
I
SAMPLING
INFORMATION
NPDES NUMBER
·z. -z. ..
NAME OF FACILITY --------------·----------
STREET ADDRESS:-----------------·---------
LENL LAB NO.
~----+-~~--+------------------------t~--t--r~-r-t-t~--~--1--~+--t-~-r--t--~-+-t----------
I~EIVED BY LABOAA.AO ORRlY: .I /l DATE /TIME
1 ~_,_p.a).Qkwmr<V '#ivtt.b'55 ~ ) (SIGNATURE) ' I
----- --- -- - ---- ----
__ -_1:.~-------------- -- --LAW ENVIRONMENTAL, INC.
NATIONAL LABORATORY
112 TOWN PARK DRIVE
KENNESAW. GEORGIA 30144
[phone]
SAMPLE RECEIPT RECORD . ; '
SAMPLING
INFORMATION
NPDES NUMBER
PRq.jECT NAME /}' I JOB NO f. iH? Mo A'(;{j-v(_ .::# :3 3Z"f'1 !Jj,JI) .t.. 3 ~~SS.A~M~P~L~EjR~S~(~~I~G~~~~·~TI~IR~o~)~~~~~--~0~==~~~~~-----~~~
1--:---,.-----------------'?_\t--'7"-"'f5:::.....r_:J._l;;._-_____ -l g ~
SAMPLING DATE ~ ;:': 8'-)-'1:/ 515 f----,.----.,---,--,.=:::.--r--...:.... ____________ -1,__"'
~ ~ ·soooo: TIME = o CODE
"' u
SAMPLE STATION DESCRIPTION
NAME OF FACILITY: -----------------------
STREET ADDRESS:----------------------
LENL lAB NO.
RECEIVED BY LABORATCJ,.RY: DATE 1 TIME ~ .av,~·,-"<.< .i::i>C. W15k# §4My", I v«-::J .._ 3 (SIGNATURE) ~V'-"..:l-J
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Conoco Store No. 33047-Comprehensive Site Assessment Report
Law Engineering Project 56-4533
APPENDIXE
February 6, 1995
FinaL
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL DATA FOR GROUND WATER AND
CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY RECORDS
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I'
I
I,
December 28. 1994
Sharon Tyndall
Law Environmental, Inc.
2801 Yorkmont Rd.
Charlotte, NC 28208
LAW
ENGINEERING AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
Subject: Chemical analysis of samples rL'Ceived on 12/17/94
Project Number: 56-4533 TOOO
Dear Ms. Tyndall:
Law Environmental National Laboratories has completed its analysis of your samples and reports
the results on the following pages. These results relate only to the contents of the samples as
submitted. This report shall not be reproduced except in full without the approval of Law
Environmental National Laboratories.
If there are any questions. please do not hesitate to contact us.
Sincerely,
LAW ENVIRONMENTAL NATIONAL LABORATORIES
Patrick Kelley
Hydrocarbon Supervisor
PK:so
Enclosures: Data Report
Invoice
LAW ENVIRONMENTAL, INC.
NATIONAL LABORATORIES
112 TOWN PARK DRIVE • KENNESAW. GA 30144
[phone] • FAX [phone]
ONE OF ~E LAW COMPANIES@
!
.:•·I ' !
Date 12/28/94
Page 1
Lab Number
Project No.
Project Name
LAW ENVIRONMENTAL NATIONAL LABORATORIES
TEST DATA REPORT
64-9269-02
56-4533 TOOO
CONOCO 33047
---Project Information ---
Cust. No.
Manager: SHARON TYNDALL
station ID
Matrix
Type
Collector
MW-1
w
GRAB
SMT
---Sample Information ---
Sampled Date/Time
Received Date/Time
Received From/By
Chain of Custody
Number of Containers
I
I
I
I
I
12/16/94 14:50
12/17/94 08:55 I DSG/JA
29384
1
I
Parameter .............................. Method .... Units DL ........ Results ... Test Date Analy
--GC ANALYSIS (BTEX) RESULTS
Methyl-Tertiary-Butyl Ether
Benzene
Toluene
Ethylbenzene
Xylene, Total
Isopropyl Ether
Remarks:
DL = Detection Limit
EPA 602
EPA 602
EPA 602
EPA 602
EPA 602
EPA 602
ug/1 5.0 67 12/23/94 PK
ug/1 1.0 9.6 12/23/94 PK
ug/1 1.0 NO 12/23/94 PK
ug/1 1.0 NO 12/23/94 PK
ug/1 2.0 23 12/23/94 PK
ug/1 1.0 NO 12/23/94 PK
NO = Not Detected at the DL
Unless otherwise noted, all soil test results are calculated based on dry weight.
Signed [Zt:"J.. ~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Date
Page
12/28/94
1
Lab Number
Project No.
Project Name
LAW ENVIRONMENTAL NATIONAL LABORATORIES
TEST DATA REPORT
64-9269-03
56-4533 TODD
CONOCO 33047
---Project Information ---
Cust. No.
Manager: SHARON TYNDALL
Station ID
Matrix
Type
Collector
MW-2
w
GRAB
SMT
---Sample Information ---
Sampled Date/Time
Received Date/Time
Received From/By
Chain of Custody
Number of Containers
12/16/94 14:55
12/17/94 08:55
DSG/JA
29384
1
Parameter .............................. Method .... Units OL ........ Results ... Test Date Analy
--GC ANALYSIS (BTEX) RESULTS
Methyl-Tertiary-Butyl Ether EPA 602 ug/1 355 15000 12/23/94 PK
Benzene EPA 602 ug/1 71 3900 12/23/94 PK
Toluene EPA 602 ug/1 71 5700 12/23/94 PK
Ethylbenzene EPA 602 ug/1 71 780 12/23/94 PK
Xylene, Total EPA 602 ug/1 142 3200 12/23/94 PK
Isopropyl Ether EPA 602 'ug/1 71 600 12/23/94 PK
Remarks:
DL = Detection Limit NO = Not Detected at the DL
Unless otherwise noted, all soil test results are calculated based on dry weight.
Signed ~"t;"..J, ~
I
Date 12/28/94
Page 1
Lab Number
Project No.
Project Name
LAW ENVIRONMENTAL NATIONAL LABORATORIES
TEST DATA REPORT
64-9269-04
56-4533 TOOO
CONOCO 33047
---Project Information ---
Cust. No.
Manager: SHARON TYNDALL
---Sample Information ---
Station ID MW-3 Sampled Date/Time
Matrix w Received Date/Time
Type GRAB Received From/By
Collector SMT Chain of Custody
Number of Containers
I
I
I
I
I
12/16/94 13:40
12/17/94 08:55 I DSG/JA
29384
1
I
Parameter .............................. Method .... Units DL ........ Results ... Test Date Analy
--GC ANALYSIS (BTEX) RESULTS
Methyl-Tertiary-Butyl Ether
Benzene
Toluene
Ethylbenzene
Xylene, Total
Isopropyl Ether
Remarks:
EPA 602
EPA 602
EPA 602
EPA 602
EPA 602
EPA 602
ug/1 5.0 7.4
ug/1 1.0 7.2
ug/1 1.0 1.3
ug/1 1.0 ND
ug/1 2.0 ND
ug/1 1.0 ND
DL = Detection Limit ND = Not Detected at the DL
12/23/94 PK
12/23/94 PK
12/23/94 PK
12/23/94 PK
12/23/94 PK
12/23/94 PK
unless otherwise noted, all soil test results are calculated based on dry weight.
Signed r{lt-..d, ~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Date
Page
12/28/94
1
Lab Number
Project No.
Project Name
LAW ENVIRONMENTAL NATIONAL LABORATORIES
TEST DATA REPORT
64-9269-05
56-4533 TOOO
CONOCO 33047
---Project Information ---
Cust. No.
Manager: SHARON TYNDALL
Station ID
Matrix
Type
Collector
MW-5
w
GRAB
SMT
---Sample Information ---
Sampled Date/Time
Received Date/Time
Received From/By
Chain of Custody
Number of Containers
12/16/94 13:50
12/17/94 08:55
DSG/JA
29384
1
Parameter .............................. Method .... Units OL ........ Results ... Test Date Analy
--GC ANALYSIS (BTEX) RESULTS
Methyl-Tertiary-Butyl Ether EPA 602 ug/1 5.0 NO 12/24/94 PK
Benzene EPA 602 ug/1 1.0 NO 12/24/94 PK
Toluene EPA 602 ug/1 1.0 1.3 12/24/94 PK
Ethylbenzene EPA 602 ug/1 1.0 NO 12/24/94 PK
Xylene, Total EPA 602 ug/1 2.0 NO 12/24/94 PK
Isopropyl Ether EPA 602 ug/1 1.0 NO 12/24/94 PK
Remarks:
DL = Detection Limit ND = Not Detected at the DL
Unless otherwise noted, all soil test results are calculated based on dry weight.
Signed
I i
I
Date
Page
12/28/94
1
Lab Number
Project No.
Project Name
LAW ENVIRONMENTAL NATIONAL LABORATORIES
TEST DATA REPORT
64-9269-06
56-4533 TOOO
CONOCO 33047
---Project Information ---
Cust. No.
Manager: SHARON TYNDALL
Station ID
Matrix
Type
Collector
MW-6
w
GRAB
SMT
---Sample Information ---
Sampled Date/Time
Received Date/Time
Received From/By
Chain of Custody
Number of Containers
I
I
I
I
I
12/16/94 14:10
12/17/94 08:55 I DSG/JA
29384
1
I
Parameter .............................. Method .... Units DL ........ Results ... Test Date Analy
--GC ANALYSIS (BTEX) RESULTS
Methyl-Tertiary-Butyl Ether
Benzene
Toluene
Ethylbenzene
Xylene, Total
Isopropyl Ether
Remarks:
EPA
EPA
EPA
EPA
EPA
EPA
602 ug/1
602 ug/1
602 ug/1
602 ug/1
602 ug/1
602 ug/1
5.0 35 12/24/94 PK
l.O ND 12/24/94 PK
1.0 2. 3 12/24/94 PK
1.0 1.9 12/24/94 PK
2.0 13 12/24/94 PK
l.O 9.6 12/24/94 PK
DL = Detection Limit NO = Not Detected at the DL
Unless otherwise noted, all soil test results are calculated based on dry weight.
Signed
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
LAW ENVIRONMENTAL NATIONAL LABORATORIES
TEST DATA REPORT
Date
Page
12/2B/94
1
Lab Number
Project No.
Project Name
Manager:
Station ID
Matrix
Type
Collector
64-9269-07
56-4533 TODD
CONOCO
SHARON
MW-7
w
GRAB
SMT
33047
TYNDALL
---Project Information ---
Cust. No.
---Sample Information ---
Sampled Date/Time
Received Date/Time
Received From/By
Chain of Custody
12/16/94 14:40
12/17/94 OB:55
DSG/JA
293B4
Number of Containers 1
Parameter .............................. Method .... Units DL ........ Results ... Test Date Analy
--GC ANALYSIS (BTEX) RESULTS
Methyl-Tertiary-Butyl Ether EPA 602 ug/1 850 34000 12/24/94 PK
Benzene EPA 602 ug/1 170 8500 12/24/94 PK
Toluene EPA 602 ug/1 170 10000 12/24/94 PK
Ethylbenzene EPA 602 ug/1 170 1300 12/24/94 PK
Xylene, Total EPA 602 ug/1 340 5000 12/24/94 PK
Isopropyl Ether EPA 602 ug/1 170 760 12/24/94 PK
Remarks:
DL = Detection Limit ND = Not Detected at the DL
Unless otherwise noted, all soil test results are calculated based on dry weight.
Signed ftt:wt, ~
!
I i
Date 12/28/94
Page 1
Lab Number
Project No.
Project Name
LAW ENVIRONMENTAL NATIONAL LABORATORIES
TEST DATA REPORT
64-9269-08
56-4533 TOOO
CONOCO 33047
---Project Information ---
Cust. No.
Manager: SHARON TYNDALL
Station ID
Matrix
Type
Collector
MW-8
w
GRAB
SMT
---Sample Information ---
Sampled Date/Time
Received Date/Time
Received From/By
Chain of Custody
Number of Containers
I
I
I
I
I
12/16/94 14:35
12/17/94 08:55 I DSG/JA
29384
1
I Parameter .............................. Method .... Units DL ........ Results ... Test Date Analy
--GC ANALYSIS (BTEX) RESULTS
Methyl-Tertiary-Butyl Ether EPA 602 ug/1 39 2200 12/24/94 PK I
Benzene EPA 602 ug/1 7. 7 ND 12/24/94 PK
I Toluene EPA 602 ug/1 7.7 NO 12/24/94 PK
Ethylbenzene EPA 602 ug/1 7. 7 ND 12/24/94 PK
Xylene, Total EPA 602 ug/1 15 27 12/24/94 PK
Isopropyl Ether EPA 602 ug/1 7.7 38 12/24/94 PK I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Remarks: I
DL = Detection Limit NO = Not Detected at the DL
Unless otherwise noted, all soil test results are calculated based on dry weight. I
Signed I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
LAW ENVIRONMENTAL NATIONAL LABORATORIES
TEST DATA REPORT
Date 12/28/94
Page 1
Lab Number
Project No.
Project Name
64-9269-09
56-4533 TOOO
CONOCO 33047
Manager: SHARON TYNDALL
Station ID
Matrix
Type
Collector
TRIP BLANK
w
GRAB
---Project Information ---
Cust. No.
---Sample Information ---
Sampled Date/Time
Received Date/Time
Received From/By
Chain of Custody
12/16/94
12/17/94 08:55
DSG/JA
29384
Number of Containers 2
Parameter .............................. Method .... Units DL ........ Results ... Test Date Analy
--GC ANALYSIS (BTEX) RESULTS
Methyl-Tertiary-Butyl Ether EPA 602 ug/1 5.0 ND 12/24/94 PK
Benzene EPA 602 ug/1 1.0 ND 12/24/94 PK
Toluene EPA 602 ug/1 1.0 2.2 12/24/94 PK
Ethylbenzene EPA 602 ug/1 1.0 ND 12/24/94 PK
Xylene, Total EPA 602 ug/1 2.0 ND 12/24/94 PK
Isopropyl Ether EPA 602 ug/1 1.0 ND 12/24/94 PK
Remarks:
DL = Detection Limit ND = Not Detected at the DL
Unless otherwise noted, all soil test results are calculated based on dry weight.
Signed
J /
/
January 9, 1995
Sharon Tyndall
Law Environmental, Inc.
2801 Yorkmont Rd.
Charlotte, NC 28208
LAW
ENGINEERING AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
Subject: Chemical analysis of samples received on 12/17/94
Project Number: 56-4533 TOOO
Dear Ms. Tyndall:
Law Environmental National Laboratories has completed its analysis ol' your samples and
reports the results on the following pages. These results relate only to the contents or the
samples as submitted. This report shall not be reproduced except in full without the approval
of Law Environmental National Laboratories.
If there are any questions, please do not hesitate to contact Rhonda K. Arnwine at (404)-421-
3306.
Sincerely,
LAW ENVIRONMENTAL NATIONAL LABORATORIES
c;y-~,,J
W. Paul Brafford
Laboratory Manager
WPB:pah
Enclosures: Data Report
Invoice
LAW ENVIRONMENTAL, INC.
NATIONAL LABORATORIES
112 TOWN PARK DRIVE • KENNESAW, GA 30144
(404) 421 ·3400 • FAX (404) 421·3486
ONE OF n!E l.AW COMPANIES @
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
LAW ENVIRONMENTAL NATIONAL LABORATORIES
TEST DATA REPORT
Date 01/09/95
Page 1
Lab Number
Project No.
Project Name
94-9646-01
56-4533 TOOO
CONOCO 33047
Manager: SHARON TYNDALL
Station ID
Matrix
Type
Collector
MW-1
w
GRAB
DSG
---Project Information ---
Cust. No.
---Sample Information ---
Sampled Date/Time
Received Date/Time
Received From/By
Chain of Custody
Number of Containers
12/16/94
12/17/94
DSG/JA
29384
5
14:50
08:55
Parameter .............................. Method .... Units DL ........ Results ... Test Date Analy
--METALS PREP RESULTS --
Metals Prep: Acid Extracted SM 3030C EXTRACTED 12/17/95 cw
---SERIES 39000
Lead, Extractable EPA 6010 mg/1 0.032 NO 12/19/94 SDE
--GC ORGANIC ANALYSIS RESULTS
1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB) EPA 504 ug/1 0.02 NO 12/23/94 DCE
Ext/1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB) EPA 504 EXTRACTED 12/22/94 BT
--GC VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS (AQ) RESULTS --
Dichlorodifluoromethane EPA 601 ug/1 0.59 NO 12/29/94 vz
Chloromethane EPA 601 ug/1 0.47 NO 12/29/94 vz
Vinyl Chloride EPA 601 ug/1 0.53 NO 12/29/94 vz
Bromomethane EPA 601 ug/1 0.48 NO 12/29/94 vz
Chloroethane EPA 601 ug/1 0.52 NO 12/29/94 vz
Trichlorofluoromethane EPA 601 ug/1 0.86 NO 12/29/94 vz
1,1-Dichloroethene EPA 601 ug/1 0.67 NO 12/29/94 vz
Methylene Chloride EPA 601 ug/1 2.0 NO 12/29/94 vz
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene EPA 601 ug/1 0.73 NO 12/29/94 vz
1,1-0ichloroethane EPA 601 ug/1 0.78 NO 12/29/94 vz
Chloroform EPA 601 ug/1 0.75 NO 12/29/94 vz
1,1,1-Trichloroethane EPA 601 ug/1 1.8 NO 12/29/94 vz
Carbon Tetrachloride EPA 601 ug/1 0.75 NO 12/29/94 vz
1,2-Dichloroethane EPA 601 ug/1 0.89 NO 12/29/94 vz
Trichloroethane EPA 601 ug/1 0.83 NO 12/29/94 vz
1,2-Dichloropropane EPA 601 ug/1 0.74 NO 12/29/94 vz
Bromodichloromethane EPA 601 ug/1 0.81 NO 12/29/94 vz
2-Chloroethylvinyl ether EPA 601 ug/1 1.9 NO 12/29/94 vz
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene EPA 601 ug/1 0.69 NO 12/29/94 vz
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene EPA 601 ug/1 0.84 NO 12/29/94 vz
Remarks: HC LAB # 64-9269
DL = Detection Limit NO = Not Detected at the DL
Unless otherwise noted, all soil test results are calculated based on dry weight.
tJ?/AtcA?J Signed
·"~ '1 /I
I
Date 01/09/95
Page 2
Lab Number
Project No.
94-9646-01
56-4533 TOOO
LAW ENVIRONMENTAL NATIONAL LABORATORIES
TEST DATA REPORT
Parameter .............................. Method .... Units DL ........ Results ... Test Date
--GC VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS (AQ) RESULTS --
1,1,2-Trichloroethane EPA 601 ug/1 0.86 ND 12/29/94
Tetrachloroethane EPA 601 ug/1 0.91 ND 12/29/94
Oibromochloromethane EPA 601 ug/1 0.85 ND 12/29/94
Chlorobenzene EPA 601 ug/1 0.82 ND 12/29/94
Bromoform EPA 601 ug/1 0.80 ND 12/29/94
1,1,2,2,-Tetrachloroethane EPA 601 ug/1 1.1 ND 12/29/94
1,3-Dichlorobenzene EPA 601 ug/1 1.5 ND 12/29/94
1,4-Dichlorobenzene EPA 501 ug/1 1.2 ND 12/29/94
1,2-Dichlorobenzene EPA 501 ug/1 1.2 ND 12/29/94
Signed
I
I
I
Analy I
vz I vz vz
vz I vz
vz vz vz I vz
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
···I I,
LAW ENVIRONMENTAL NATIONAL LABORATORIES
TEST DATA REPORT
Date
Page
.01/09/95
1
---Project Information ---
Lab Number
Project No.
Project Name
94-9646-02
56-4533 TOOO
CONOCO 33047
Manager: SHARON TYNDALL
Cust. No.
---Sample Information ---
Station IO
Matrix
Type
Collector
MW-2
w
GRAB
DSG
Sampled Date/Time
Received Date/Time
Received From/By
Chain of Custody
Number of Containers
12/16/94
12/17/94
DSG/JA
29384
6
14:55
08:55
Parameter .............................. Method .... Units DL ........ Results ... Test Date Analy
--METALS PREP RESULTS --
Metals Prep: Acid Extracted
---SERIES 39000
Lead, Extractable
--GC ORGANIC ANALYSIS RESULTS
1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)
Ext/1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)
SM 3030C
EPA 6010
EPA 504
EPA 504
--GC VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS (AQ) RESULTS --
Oichlorodifluoromethane EPA 601
Chloromethane
Vinyl Chloride
Bromomethane
Chloroethane
Trichlorofluoromethane
1,1-Dichloroethene
Methylene Chloride
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
1,1-Dichloroethane
Chloroform
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
Carbon Tetrachloride
1,2-Dichloroethane
Trichloroethane
1,2-Dichloropropane
Bromodichloromethane
2-Chloroethylvinyl ether
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
Remarks:
DL = Detection Limit
EPA 601
EPA 601
EPA 601
EPA 601
EPA 601
EPA 601
EPA 601
EPA 601
EPA 601
EPA 601
EPA 601
EPA 601
EPA 601
EPA 601
EPA 601
EPA 601
EPA 601
EPA 601
EPA 601
EPA 601
mg/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
0.032
0.02
0.59
0.47
0.53
0.48
0.52
0.86
0.67
2.0
0.73
0.78
0.75
1.8
0.75
0.89
0. 83
0.74
0.81
1.9
0.69
0.84
0.86
EXTRACTED 12/17/95 CW
ND 12/19/94 SDE
ND 12/24/94 DCE
EXTRACTED 12/22/94 BT
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
12/31/94 vz
12/31/94 vz
12/31/94 vz
12/31/94 vz
12/31/94 vz
12/31/94 vz
12/31/94 vz
12/31/94 vz
12/31/94 vz
12/31/94 vz
12/31/94 vz
12/31/94 vz
12/31/94 vz
12/31/94 vz
12/31/94 vz
12/31/94 vz
12/31/94 vz
12/31/94 vz
12/31/94 vz
12/31/94 vz
12/31/94 vz
ND = Not Detected at the DL
Unless otherwise noted, all soil test results are calculated based on dry
Signed
/ I
Date
Page
01/09/95
2
Lab Number
Project No.
94-9646-02
56-4533 TOOO
LAW ENVIRONMENTAL NATIONAL LABORATORIES
TEST DATA REPORT
I
I
I
I
Parameter. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Method. . . . Units DL ........ Results ... Test Date Analy
--GC VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS (AQ) RESULTS --
Tetrachloroethane EPA 601 ug/1 0.91 3.1 12/31/94 vz I
Dibromochloromethane EPA 601 ug/1 0.85 ND 12/31/94 vz
Chlorobenzene EPA 601 ug/1 0.82 ND
Bromoform EPA 601 ug/1 0.80 ND
1,1,2,2,-Tetrachloroethane EPA 601 ug/1 1.1 ND
12/31/94 vz I 12/31/94 vz
12/31/94 vz
1,3-Dichlorobenzene EPA 601 ug/1 1.5 ND 12/31/94 vz
1,4-0ichlorobenzene EPA 601 ug/1 1.2 ND
1,2-0ichlorobenzene EPA 601 ug/1 1.2 ND
12/31/94 vz I 12/31/94 vz
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Signed
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
LAW ENVIRONMENTAL NATIONAL LABORATORIES
TEST DATA REPORT
Date
Page
01/09/95
1
Lab Number
Project No.
Project Name
94-9646-03
56-4533 TOOO·
CONOCO 33047
Manager: SHARON TYNDALL
Station ID
Matrix
Type
Collector
MW-3
w
GRAB
DSG
---Project Information ---
Cust. No.
---Sample Information ---
Sampled Date/Time
Received Date/Time
Received From/By
Chain of Custody
Number of Containers
12/16/94 13:40
12/17/94 08:55
DSG/JA
29384
6
Parameter .............................. Method .... Units DL ........ Results ... Test Date Analy
--METALS PREP RESULTS --
Metals Prep: Acid Extracted SM 3030C EXTRACTED 12/17/95 cw
---SERIES 39000
Lead, Extractable EPA 6010 mg/1 0.032 0.076 12/19/94 SDE
--GC ORGANIC ANALYSIS RESULTS
1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB) EPA 504 ug/1 0.02 ND 12/24/94 DCE
Ext/1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB) EPA 504 EXTRACTED 12/22/94 BT
--GC VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS (AQ) RESULTS --
Dichlorodifluoromethane EPA 601 ug/l 0.59 ND 12/29/94 vz
Chloromethane EPA 601 ug/l 0.47 ND 12/29/94 vz
Vinyl Chloride EPA 601 ug/l 0.53 ND 12/29/94 vz
Bromomethane EPA 601 ug/l 0.48 ND 12/29/94 vz
Chloroethane EPA 601 ug/l 0.52 ND 12/29/94 vz
Trichlorofluoromethane EPA 601 ug/l 0.86 ND 12/29/94 vz
1,1-Dichloroethene EPA 601 ug/l 0.67 ND 12/29/94 vz
Methylene Chloride EPA 601 ug/l 2.0 ND 12/29/94 vz
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene EPA 601 ug/l 0.73 ND 12/29/94 vz
1,1-Dichloroethane EPA 601 ug/l 0.78 ND 12/29/94 vz
Chloroform EPA 601 ug/l 0.75 ND 12/29/94 vz
1,1,1-Trichloroethane EPA 601 ug/l 1.8 ND 12/29/94 vz
Carbon Tetrachloride EPA 601 ug/l 0.75 ND 12/29/94 vz
1,2-Dichloroethane EPA 601 ug/l 0.89 ND 12/29/94 vz
Trichloroethane EPA 601 ug/l 0.83 ND 12/29/94 vz
1,2-Dichloropropane EPA 601 ug/l 0.74 ND 12/29/94 vz
Bromodichloromethane EPA 601 ug/l 0.81 ND 12/29/94 vz
2-Chloroethylvinyl ether EPA 601 ug/l 1.9 ND 12/29/94 vz
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene EPA 601 ug/l 0.69 ND 12/29/94 vz
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene EPA 601 ug/l 0. 84 ND 12/29/94 vz
1,1,2-Trichloroethane EPA 601 ug/l 0.86 ND 12/29/94 vz
Remarks:
DL = Detection Limit ND = Not Detected at the DL
Unless otherwise noted, all soil test results are calculated based on dry
Signed
. i : I i .
/
Date
Page
01/09/95
2
Lab Number
Project No.
94-9646-03
56-4533 TOOO
LAW ENVIRONMENTAL NATIONAL LABORATORIES
TEST DATA REPORT
Parameter .............................. Method .... Units DL ........ Results ... Test Date
--GC VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS (AQ)
Tetrachloroethane
Dibromochloromethane
Chlorobenzene
Bromoform
1,1,2,2,-Tetrachloroethane
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
RESULTS --
EPA 601
EPA 601
EPA 601
EPA 601
EPA 601
EPA 601
EPA 601
EPA 601
ug/1 0.91
ug/1 0.85
ug/1 0.82
ug/1 0.80
ug/1 1.1
ug/1 1.5
ug/1 1.2
ug/1 1.2
Signed
ND 12/29/94
ND 12/29/94
ND 12/29/94
ND 12/29/94
ND 12/29/94
ND 12/29/94
ND 12/29/94
ND 12/29/94
I
I
I
I Analy
vz I vz
vz vz I vz
vz vz
vz I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
LAW ENVIRONMENTAL NATIONAL LABORATORIES
TEST DATA REPORT
Date 01/09/95
Page 1
Lab Number
Project No.
Project Name
94-9646-04
56-4533 TOOO
CONOCO 33047
Manager: SHARON TYNDALL
Station ID
Matrix
Type
Collector
MW-5
w
GRAB
DSG
---Project Information ---
Cust. No.
---Sample Information ---
Sampled Date/Time
Received Date/Time
Received From/By
Chain of Custody
Number of Containers
12/16/94
12/17/94
DSG/JA
29384
6
13:50
08:55
Parameter .............................. Method .... Units DL ........ Results ... Test Date Analy
--METALS PREP RESULTS --
Metals Prep: Acid Extracted SM 3030C EXTRACTED 12/17/95 cw
---SERIES 39000
Lead, Extractable EPA 6010 mg/1 0.032 ND 12/19/94 SDE
--GC ORGANIC ANALYSIS RESULTS
1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB) EPA 504 ug/1 0.02 ND 12/24/94 DCE
Ext/1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB) EPA 504 EXTRACTED 12/22/94 BT
--GC VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS (AQ) RESULTS --
Oichlorodifluoromethane EPA 601 ug/1 0.59 ND 12/29/94 vz
Chloromethane EPA 601 ug/1 0.47 ND 12/29/94 vz
Vinyl Chloride EPA 601 ug/1 0.53 ND 12/29/94 vz
Bromomethane EPA 601 ug/1 0.48 ND 12/29/94 vz
Chloroethane EPA 601 ug/1 0.52 ND 12/29/94 vz
Trichlorofluoromethane EPA 601 ug/1 0.86 ND 12/29/94 vz
1,1-Dichloroethene EPA 601 ug/1 0.67 ND 12/29/94 vz
Methylene Chloride EPA 601 ug/1 2.0 ND 12/29/94 vz
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene EPA 601 ug/1 0.73 ND 12/29/94 vz
1,1-Dichloroethane EPA 601 ug/1 0.78 ND 12/29/94 vz
Chloroform EPA 601 ug/1 0.75 49 12/29/94 vz
1,1,1-Trichloroethane EPA 601 ug/1 l.S ND 12/29/94 vz
Carbon Tetrachloride EPA 601 ug/l 0.75 ND 12/29/94 vz
1,2-Dichloroethane EPA 601 ug/1 0.89 ND 12/29/94 vz
Trichloroethane EPA 601 ug/1 0.83 ND 12/29/94 vz
1,2-Dichloropropane EPA 601 ug/1 0.74 ND 12/29/94 vz
Bromodichloromethane EPA 601 ug/1 0.81 ND 12/29/94 vz
2-Chloroethylvinyl ether EPA 601 ug/1 1.9 ND 12/29/94 vz
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene EPA 601 ug/1 0.69 ND 12/29/94 vz
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene EPA 601 ug/1 0.84 ND 12/29/94 vz
1,1,2-Trichloroethane EPA 601 ug/1 0.86 ND 12/29/94 vz
Remarks:
DL = Detection Limit ND = Not Detected at the DL
Unless otherwise noted, all soil test results are calculated based on dry weight.
Signed e' --1V' P'h?, c&d
Date 01/09/95
Page 2
Lab Number
Project No.
94-9646-04
56-4533 TOOO
LAW ENVIRONMENTAL NATIONAL LABORATORIES
TEST DATA REPORT
Parameter. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Method. . . . Units DL ........ Results ... Test Date
--GC VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS (AQ)
Tetrachloroethane
Dibromochloromethane
Chlorobenzene
Bromoform
1,1,2,2,-Tetrachloroethane
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
1,2-0ichlorobenzene
RESULTS --
EPA 601
EPA 601
EPA 601
EPA 601
EPA 601
EPA 601
EPA 601
EPA 601
ug/1 0.91 ND 12/29/94
ug/1 0.85 ND 12/29/94
ug/1 0. 82 ND 12/29/94
ug/1 0.80 ND 12/29/94
ug/1 1.1 ND 12/29/94
ug/1 1.5 ND 12/29/94
ug/1 1.2 ND 12/29/94
ug/1 1.2 ND 12/29/94
Signed
I
I
I
vz I vz vz
vz I vz vz
vz vz I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
LAW ENVIRONMENTAL NATIONAL LABORATORIES
TEST DATA REPORT
Date 01/09/95
Page 1
Lab Number
Project No.
Project Name
94-9646-05
56-4533 TOOO
CONOCO 33047
Manager: SHARON TYNDALL
Station ID
Matrix
Type
Collector
MW-6
w
GRAB
DSG
---Project Information ---
Cust. No.
---Sample Information ---
Sampled Date/Time
Received Date/Time
Received From/By
Chain of Custody
Number of Containers
12/16/94
12/17/94
DSG/JA
29384
6
14:10
08:55
Parameter .............................. Method .... Units DL ........ Results ... Test Date Analy
--METALS PREP RESULTS --
Metals Prep: Acid Extracted SM 3030C EXTRACTED 12/17/95 cw
---SERIES 39000
Lead, Extractable EPA 6010 mg/1 0.032 NO 12/19/94 SDE
--GC ORGANIC ANALYSIS RESULTS
1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB) EPA 504 ug/1 0.02 NO 12/24/94 DCE
Ext/1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB) EPA 504 EXTRACTED 12/22/94 BT
--GC VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS (AQ) RESULTS --
Oichlorodifluoromethane EPA 601 ug/1 0.59 NO 12/30/94 vz
Chloromethane EPA 601 ug/1 0.47 NO 12/30/94 vz
Vinyl Chloride EPA 601 ug/1 0.53 NO 12/30/94 vz
Bromomethane EPA 601 ug/1 0.48 NO 12/30/94 vz
Chloroethane EPA 601 ug/1 0.52 NO 12/30/94 vz
Trichlorofluoromethane EPA 601 ug/1 0.86 NO 12/30/94 vz
1,1-0ichloroethene EPA 601 ug/1 0.67 NO 12/30/94 vz
Methylene Chloride EPA 601 ug/1 2.0 NO 12/30/94 vz
trana-1,2-Dichloroethene EPA 601 ug/1 0.73 NO 12/30/94 vz
1,1-Dichloroethane EPA 601 ug/1 0.78 NO 12/30/94 vz
Chloroform EPA 601 ug/1 0.75 NO 12/30/94 vz
1,1,1-Trichloroethane EPA 601 ug/1 1.8 NO 12/30/94 vz
Carbon Tetrachloride EPA 601 ug/1 0.75 NO 12/30/94 vz
1,2-Dichloroethane EPA 601 ug/1 0.89 NO 12/30/94 vz
Trichloroethane EPA 601 ug/1 0.83 NO 12/30/94 vz
1,2-Dichloropropane EPA 601 ug/1 0.74 NO 12/30/94 vz
Bromodichloromethane EPA 601 ug/1 0.81 NO 12/30/94 vz
2-Chloroethylvinyl ether EPA 601 ug/1 1.9 NO 12/30/94 vz
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene EPA 601 ug/1 0.69 NO 12/30/94 vz
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene EPA 601 ug/1 0.84 NO 12/30/94 vz
1,1,2-Trichloroethane EPA 601 ug/1 0.86 NO 12/30/94 vz
Remarks:
DL = Detection Limit ND = Not Detected at the DL
Unless otherwise noted, all soil test results are calculated based on dry weight.
Signed A-af cTVJr c~=:l .....
Date
Page
01/09/95
2
Lab Number
Project No.
94-9646-05
56-4533 TOOO
LAW ENVIRONMENTAL NATIONAL LABORATORIES
TEST DATA REPORT
I
I
I
I Parameter. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Method. . . . Units DL ........ Results ... Test Date Analy
--GC VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS (AQ) RESULTS --
Tetrachloroethane EPA 601
Oibromochloromethane EPA 601
Chlorobenzene EPA 601
Bromoform EPA 601
1,1,2,2,-Tetrachloroethane EPA 601
1,3-Dichlorobenzene EPA 601
1,4-Dichlorobenzene EPA 601
1,2-Dichlorobenzene EPA 601
ug/1 0.91
ug/1 0.85
ug/1 0.82
ug/1 0.80
ug/1 1.1
ug/1 1.5
ug/1 1.2
ug/1 1.2
Signed
ND 12/30/94 vz I
ND 12/30/94 vz
ND
ND
ND
12/30/94 vz
12/30/94 vz I 12/30/94 vz
ND 12/30/94 vz
ND
ND
12/30/94 vz
12/30/94 vz I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
d-;V~,~J·
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
LAW ENVIRONMENTAL NATIONAL LABORATORIES
TEST DATA REPORT
Date
Page
01/09/95
1
Lab Number
Project No.
Project Name
94-9646-06
56-4533 TOOO
CONOCO 33047
Manager: SHARON TYNDALL
Station IO
Matrix
Type
Collector
MW-7
w
GRAB
DSG
---Project Information ---
Cust. No.
---Sample Information ---
Sampled Date/Time
Received Date/Time
Received From/By
Chain of Custody
Number of Containers
12/16/94 14:40
12/17/94 08:55
DSG/JA
29384
6
Parameter .............................. Method .... Units DL ........ Results ... Test Date Analy
--METALS PREP RESULTS --
Metals Prep: Acid Extracted SM 3030C EXTRACTED 12/17/95 cw
---SERIES 39000
Lead, Extractable EPA 61ilO mg/1 0.032 ND 12/19/94 SDE
--GC ORGANIC ANALYSIS RESULTS
1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB) EPA 504 ug/1 0.02 ND 12/24/94 DCE
Ext/1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB) EPA 504 EXTRACTED 12/22/94 BT
--GC VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS (AQ) RESULTS --
Dichlorodifluoromethane EPA 601 ug/1 0.59 ND 12/31/94 vz
Chloromethane EPA 601 ug/1 0.47 ND 12/31/94 vz
Vinyl Chloride EPA 601 ug/1 0.53 ND 12/31/94 vz
Bromomethane EPA 601 ug/1 0.48 ND 12/31/94 vz
Chloroethane EPA 601 ug/1 0.52 ND 12/31/94 vz
Trichlorofluoromethane EPA 601 ug/1 0.86 ND 12/31/94 vz
1,1-Dichloroethene ,EPA 601 ug/1 0.67 ND 12/31/94 vz
Methylene Chloride EPA 601 ug/1 2.0 ND 12/31/94 vz
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene EPA 601 ug/1 0.73 ND 12/31/94 vz
1,1-Dichloroethane EPA 601 ug/1 0.78 ND 12/31/94 vz
Chloroform EPA 601 ug/1 0.75 ND 12/31/94 vz
1,1,1-Trichloroethane EPA 601 ug/1 1.8 ND 12/31/94 vz
Carbon Tetrachloride EPA 601 ug/1 0.75 ND 12/31/94 vz
1,2-Dichloroethane EPA 601 ug/1 0.89 ND 12/31/94 vz
Trichloroethane EPA 601 ug/1 0.83 ND 12/31/94 vz
1,2-Dichloropropane EPA 601 ug/1 0.74 ND 12/31/94 vz
Bromodichloromethane EPA 601 ug/1 0.81 ND 12/31/94 vz
2-Chloroethylvinyl ether EPA 601 ug/1 1.9 ND 12/31/94 vz
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene EPA 601 ug/1 0.69 ND 12/31/94 vz
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene EPA 601 ug/1 0.84 ND 12/31/94 vz
1,1,2-Trichloroethane EPA 601 ug/1 0.86 ND 12/31/94 vz
Remarks:
DL = Detection Limit NO = Not Detected at the DL
Unless otherwise noted, all soil test results are calculated based on dry
Signed
, ..
Date 01/09/95
Page 2
Lab Number
Project No.
94-9646-06
56-4533 TOOO
LAW ENVIRONMENTAL NATIONAL LABORATORIES
TEST DATA REPORT
I
I
I
I
Parameter. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Method. . . . Units DL ........ Results ... Test Date Analy
--GC VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS (AQ) RESULTS --
Tetrachloroethane EPA 601
Dibromochloromethane EPA 601
Chlorobenzene EPA 601
Bromoform EPA 601
1,1,2,2,-Tetrachloroethane EPA 601
1,3-Dichlorobenzene EPA 601
1,4-Dichlorobenzene EPA 601
1,2-0ichlorobenzene EPA 601
ug/1 0.91
ug/1 0.85
ug/1 0.82
ug/1 0.80
ug/1 1.1
ug/1 1.5
ug/1 1.2
ug/1 1.2
Signed
ND 12/31/94 vz I
ND 12/31/94 vz
ND
ND
ND
12/31/94 vz
12/31/94 vz I 12/31/94 vz
ND 12/31/94 vz
ND
ND
12/31/94 vz I 12/31/94 vz
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
f!-af~r~ I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Date 01/09/95
Page 1
Lab Number
Project No.
Project Name
LAW ENVIRONMENTAL NATIONAL LABORATORIES
TEST DATA REPORT
94-9646-07
56-4533 TODD
CONOCO 33047
---Project Information
Cust. No.
Manager: SHARON TYNDALL
Station ID
Matrix
Type
Collector
MW-8
w
GRAB
DSG
---Sample Information ---
Sampled Date/Time
Received Date/Time
Received From/By
Chain of Custody
Number of Containers
12/16/94
12/17/94
DSG/JA
29384
6
14:35
08:55
Parameter .............................. Method .... Units DL ........ Results ... Test Date Analy
--METALS PREP RESULTS --
Metals Prep: Acid Extracted
---SERIES 39000
Lead, Extractable
--GC ORGANIC ANALYSIS RESULTS
1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)
Ext/1,2-Dibromo9thane (EDB)
SM 3030C
EPA 6010
EPA 504
EPA 504
--GC VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS (AQ) RESULTS --
Dichlorodifluoromethane EPA 601
Chloromethane
Vinyl Chloride
Bromomethane
Chloroethane
Trichlorofluoromethane
1,1-Dichloroethene
Methylene Chloride.
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
1,1-0ichloroethane
Chloroform
1,1,1-Trich1oroethane
Carbon Tetrachloride
1,2-0ichloroethane
Trichloroethane
1,2-0ichloropropane
Bromodichloromethane
2-Chloroethylvinyl ether
cis-1,3-0ichloropropene
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
Remarks:
DL = Detection Limit
EPA 601
EPA 601
EPA 601
EPA 601
EPA 601
EPA 601
EPA 601
EPA 601
EPA 601
EPA 601
EPA 601
EPA 601
EPA 601
EPA 601
EPA 601
EPA 601
EPA 601
EPA 601
I!PA 601
EPA 601
mg/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
ug/1
0.032
0.02
0.59
0.47
0.53
0.48
0.52
0.86
0.67
2.0
0.73
0.78
0.75
1.8
0.75
0.89
0.83
0.74
0.81
1.9
0.69
0. 84
0.86
EXTRACTED 12/17/95 CW
0.21 12/19/94 SDE
ND 12/24/94 DC!!
EXTRACTED 12/22/94 BT
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
12/30/94 vz
12/30/94 vz
12/30/94 vz
12/30/94 vz
12/30/94 vz
12/30/94 vz
12/30/94 vz
12/30/94 vz
12/30/94 vz
12/30/94 vz
12/30/94 vz
12/30/94 vz
12/30/94 vz
12/30/94 vz
12/30/94 vz
12/30/94 vz
12/30/94 vz
12/30/94 vz
12/30/94 vz
12/30/94 vz
12/30/94 vz
NO = Not Detected at the OL
Unless otherwise noted, all soil test results are calculated based on dry weight.
Signed
/
Date 01/09/95
Page 2
Lab Number
Project No.
94-9646-07
56-4533 TOOO
LAW ENVIRONMENTAL NATIONAL LABORATORIES
TEST DATA REPORT
Parameter .............................. Method .... Units OL ........ Results ... Test Date
--GC VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS (AQ) RESULTS --
Tetrachloroethane EPA 601 ug/1 0.91 ND 12/30/94
Dibromochloromethane EPA 601 ug/1 0. 85 ND 12/30/94
Chlorobenzene EPA 601 ug/1 0.82 ND 12/30/94
Bromoform EPA 601 ug/1 0.80 ND 12/30/94
1,1,2,2,-Tetrachloroethane EPA 601 ug/1 1.1 ND 12/30/94
1,3-Dichlorobenzene EPA 601 ug/1 1.5 ND 12/30/94
1,4-Dichlorobenzene EPA 601 ug/1 1.2 ND 12/30/94
1,2-Dichlorobenzene EPA 601 ug/1 1.2 ND 12/30/94
I
I
I
vz I vz
vz
vz I vz
vz
vz
vz I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Signed
I ~~ /;u(Cft\ __ L.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
li I I
LAW ENVIRONMENTAL NATIONAL LABORATORIES
TEST DATA REPORT
Date 01/09/95
Page 1
Lab Number
Project No.
Project Name
94-9646-08
56-4533 TOOO
CONOCO 33047
Manager: SHARON TYNDALL
Station ID
Matrix
Type
Collector
TRIP BLANK
w
GRAB
---Project Information ---
Cust. No.
---Sample Information ---
Sampled Date/Time
Received Date/Time
Received From/By
Chain of Custody
Number of Containers
11/16/94
12/17/94 08:55
DSG/JA
29384
10
Parameter .............................. Method .... Units DL ........ Results ... Test Date Analy
--GC ORGANIC ANALYSIS RESULTS
1,2-0ibromoethane (EDB) EPA 504 ug/1 0.02 ND 12/23/94 DCE
Ext/1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB) EPA 504 EXTRACTED 12/22/94 BT
--GC VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS (AQ) RESULTS --
Dichlorodifluoromethane EPA 601 ug/l 0.59 ND 12/29/94 vz
Chloromethane EPA 601 ug/l 0.47 ND 12/29/94 vz
Vinyl Chloride EPA 601 ug/l 0.53 ND 12/29/94 vz
Bromomethane EPA 601 ug/l 0.48 ND 12/29/94 vz
Chloroethane EPA 601 ug/l 0.52 ND 12/29/94 vz
Trichlorofluoromethane EPA 601 ug/l 0.86 ND 12/29/94 vz
1,1-Dichloroethene EPA 601 ug/l 0.67 ND 12/29/94 vz
Methylene Chloride EPA 601 ug/l 2. 0 ND 12/29/94 vz
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene EPA 601 ug/l 0.73 ND 12/29/94 vz
1,1-Dichloroethane EPA 601 ug/l 0.78 ND 12/29/94 vz
Chloroform EPA 601 ug/l 0.75 ND 12/29/94 vz
1,1,1-Trichloroethane EPA 601 ug/l 1.8 ND 12/29/94 vz
Carbon Tetrachloride EPA 601 ug/l 0.75 ND 12/29/94 vz
1,2-Dichloroethane EPA 601 ug/l 0.89 ND 12/29/94 vz
Trichloroethane EPA 601 ug/l 0.83 ND 12/29/94 vz
1,2-Dichloropropane EPA 601 ug/l 0.74 ND 12/29/94 vz
Bromodichloromethane EPA 601 ug/l 0.81 ND 12/29/94 vz
2-Chloroethylvinyl ether EPA 601 ug/l 1.9 ND 12/29/94 vz
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene EPA 601 ug/l 0.69 ND 12/29/94 vz
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene EPA 601 ug/l 0. 84 ND 12/29/94 vz
1,1,2-Trichloroethane EPA 601 ug/l 0.86 ND 12/29/94 vz
Tetrachloroethane EPA 601 ug/l 0.91 ND 12/29/94 vz
Dibromochloromethane EPA 601 ug/l 0.85 ND 12/29/94 vz
Chlorobenzene EPA 601 ug/l 0.82 ND 12/29/94 vz
Bromoform EPA 601 ug/l 0.80 ND 12/29/94 vz
1,1,2,2,-Tetrachloroethane EPA 601 ug/l 1.1 ND 12/29/94 vz
1,3-Dichlorobenzene EPA 601 ug/l 1.5 ND 12/29/94 vz
Remarks:
DL = Detection Limit ND = Not Detected at the DL
Unless otherwise noted, all soil test results are calculated based on dry weight. ~
Signed L--;{]1 ~~
Date
Page
01/09/95
2
Lab Number
Project No.
94-9646-08
56-4533 TOOO
LAW ENVIRONMENTAL NATIONAL LABORATORIES
TEST DATA REPORT
I
I
I
Parameter. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Method. . . . Units DL ........ Results ... Test Date
--GC VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS (AQ) RESULTS --
1,4·Dichlorobenzene
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
EPA 601
EPA 601
ug/1
ug/1
1.2
1.2
Signed
NO
NO
12/29/94
12/29/94
vz
vz I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
e-4/~e;-J
I
-z· --~---~..._-- - - - - - - - - --. - - -
LAW ENVIRONMENTAL, INC.
NATIONAL LABORATORY
112 TOWN PARK DRIVE
KENNESAW, GEORGIA 30144
[phone]
INTRA-LABORATORY SAMPLE TRANSFER RECORD
SAMPLERS(~
SAMPLING
INFORMATION
NPDES NUMBER
1:J~
0~ rS~A-M-PL-IN-G~D-A_T_E ______________________ -1~~
~--~~~/.~~--~~~6~?~'V __________ ~§!
TIME ~ ~ • SllJRCf:
f§ 8 CODE
SAMPLE STATION DESCRIPTION
J</1('--~ 50 5,12-1 12-
/'(JV )C w ?lf_iJ-I I )
I Ncr } lA I ~~~--;l I J
/3Li<J y rr.f "111 "'-' -3 I I
13so X' VJ .ntt.J-_f-.1 I
/'/tu w-{;J M'M-/, I I
)/~ r tJ
(
?1/tu-( I I
1'135"' ,( (,..) /If w-t I I
-:::J(f )f /,J --1_ ~ ~ .k. z... '--
1/
NAME OF FACILITY:--------------------
STREET ADDRESS: -------------------
LENL LAB NO.
I I
~oz.
-of.t
-of
--·--i~t~ --
LAW ENVIRONMENTAL, INC.
NATIONAL LABORATORY
112 TOWNPARK DRIVE
KENNESAW, GEORGIA 30144
CHAIN OF~etJSTODV RECORD N~ 29384
[phone]
,-
v
WATER·W
i.J
I
'MATRIX
SOIL I SEDIMENT· SO
SAMPLE STATION DESCRIPTION
Y~MJ--L
-3
-5
,vtMJ-6
t'VtMJ -l
VlvW -a
DATE I TIME
SLUDGE· SL
OTHER· NA
REMARKS
SAMPLING
INFORMATION
7
1 5
7 ~
1 ...,
3
3
7
3
7 '3 3>
NAME OF FACILITY: ---=-=-"--'-'-2..~--'-"'=--'-L------------­
STREET ADDRESS:---.---,.---...,..,.---;---------------
DATE I TIME RELINQUISHED BY:
PINK COPY RETAINED BY SAMPLERS. YELLOW COPY RETAINED BY LABORATORY.
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Conoco Store No. 33047-Comprehensive Site Assessment Report
Law Engineering Project 56-4533
APPENDIXF
CALCULATIONS
February 6, 1995
Final
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
LAW
ENGINEERING AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
p• •• :' }, -'
(\ ·. D • :;o
r~_,J~~-o~L.II75f:.
34t>f+
L e " ~::79·£'1, n -( IJ, Zz+. ~2)
8.4btt
!.-vr > '?~.! :r<oft
~t = .40 f€\'..t
t ~ 7. S fr\1 n t_ =. 1. s min.
;
-4 2 X I 0 C<t»f Sec.-
JOB NO. C:i; · U ;;;; ] SHEET----'----OF_/,__ __
JOBNAME~C~&~~O~l~O~~-;,~:·,_J~~·;_· _______ __
BY SdY!1" DATE __ci...:_}.:::.:;,.:.J.y-'-/-'-q~::...:;' ___ _
CHECKEDBY ~ DATE ___:_o_I/.=_2C):....c/_q_t; __ _
r _ , r. , ell/ ". ~ ' '.A; ? ' ~ ...
10.3(.,
I.-e. -)&-fff_ ~ 2~ -( 14. 23 +' 41)
10' 3t..
t.,v..; , itvn ,: "
t " IS m'n
1~------------------------~----------
FORM 17
LAW ENGINEERING TESTING COMPANY JOBNAME 0-otJvu !J'JO'i7 JOB NO. 5'(, • </.f"J3
BY ]5g j/11 l DATE /2.-·11.-9'1 CK _____ DATE ____ SHEET.2.:.oF..]_
0
.5
1-J
I -::;;.:. ( ;..-..:,;-----4.!-f ;-. -AI{~~If'o --.
I t.j. I 0 ..... ______ _ , ~ ~ ·-_ I . 0
\?J•~t---__ ._Lp~ __ 0~~-v__ __ _ __
---, ·--------
1. 5 ______ H·(P'9 _______ .~P:. ______ _
' 0 __ \?: tp} ----~Lf_L __
---\'lJ·lf-~--------1---·~P
-------·---------. f-----
)..5
3-0
3.5 ---· -·-- -.. -· -· -------+-----
/ -~--~-___,\.:.L.'.'?:>· s__:_q --t--'---' 0LL/1_-+___._.__,_L{ ?:::_____ _______________________ _
___:_<+:_::..5_-+------l-----+----------------------------------------~
~v~-~"-4----\1~·~~-~~~r-~·~3~·~~/--~-·~~~o ____ +---------·-··----------~
____ 7. ~---t-----.,---------t-----,----+-----:-------------··
1[f0 s~--_\.___.'?~·<?:..cll'-------1-----' H ____ ·~3 __ -----------------------~--------_-_ -----
-~:_'!_ __ ---------1--------------------
jD'fl"-,o:~--------i------------lr _l\_ _____ /3. 53 __ -3_1 ____ I-_0S_--t----------
~Jooq__J_l~!!._---1-'7-----t----+-------l----------------
ID! [;J. CJ'I • ?--q .33 --------------'"-------------------------------------
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
?-~~ ~H --_13·~'1...!_1 ___ --+-_ .• ~?-::..-'.6 ---1-----..1.:-=--g --1-------------------------------I
------I --------· --·--·--··-
. --------------------1---------l------1-----·
-------------------------
-------~-----·---
-------------+-----+-------1---------------··. -· --------. --------I
----------------------------·-··· --------
·-----------------------·
-----I
I ·------------·-----t---------1-------------···----------·-.......... ---
I
,f:. --
~0-163~
(7n0W :)h,"'t,. ;;,~ O'i7
. ::·182
I
I
I
I
I
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' I ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' I '
I
I ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
I b.
I >--.
-.,-
~ i::.
I " "" ~
I ~\:'
~~ It'-.) -..I
I ~
I 1
I
I
.u I ':')
Semi-Lo!l.arUhmlc
2 Cycles :1 10 to the Inch
''I 10 I if'--· . . -,1/)
8/tfSIP().: "ii1146,t(l'ft,.,rres) . -.,)':.:·~ ,. -··; .. ·.·,· ·"{.'·f:'/:' ··· .
I
('cnow 1< '3304 1 jPROJNAME: PROJ NO: Sb--.2jS"3~_-' I I
I i
1
HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY CALCULATION WORKSHEET
~Monitoring Well: MW-8
I Test Date: ___ --::01-o'2::-'-I0'-60::-9::-'4=----
Prepared by:~KM:'-':0----------­
Checked by:_,_JL,_G"------------
I
I
I Test Type: ___ _,S00L00U'-'G'--O=UT_,_ __ _ I
I < -EOUATIONVARIABLES
rc =
n=
rw=
Le =
Lw=
H=
yo=
yt=
t=
Sand Pack=
0.083 (ft)
0.30
0.417 (ft)
8.46 (fi)
8.46 (ft)
50.0 (fi)
0.47 (ft)
0.40 (ft)
2.5 (min)
YES
-. -EQUATIONS
rc (adJUSted)=
Lelrw =
ln(Lw/rw)=
ln(Relrw)=
---9)_'1_ (11)
20.29
3.01
\. 78 (see below)
1----:-:---;-;--:--;:--:--:=---,----:-:-=--:-:-:-:-:c-:---:--------i K-[(rc'2ln(Re/rw))/2LcJ"(l/t)ln(yo/yt) I I I
! K= 4E-04 (ft/min)
K= 2E-04 (em/sec)
' J
I
' I
I I
I
I
Table of Coefficients (dimensionless)
Lelrw A B c
~-----~~~~~~~~~~~~~----~----~~-~C~a~lc~u~la~t~io~n_,o~f~C~o=cffi~•~•~ic~n~ts=-~~-----~'
Value range for Le/Rw from Table of Coefficients
Le/rw I A I B 1 C
4 1.75 0.25 0.75
5 1.76 0.25 0.85
20 2.23 0.29
25 2.40 0.31
175j_
1.9
6 1.77 0.25 0.90
7 1.80 0.25 1.00
I-------:;-----7-~----';'-:-:'-------':"::-::-J--------'In"-t"'e'-""ro<o'i-'la"'te-,d,_V=alucs of A Band C for Lc/Rw
20.291 2.241 0.291 1.76!
8 1.83 0.25 1.10
9 1.90 0.25 1.20
10 1.95 0.25 1.30
IS 2.10 0.27 1.50
I I j
20 2.23 0.29 175
25 2.40 OJ! 1.90
30 2.50 0.35 2.10 Where: Lw < H:
Calculation of ln(Rc/nvl_ __ --··-----~
40 2.75 0.45 2.45 ----------·--1, 50 3.00 0.50 270 ln((H-Lw)lrw)= __ _ 6.00 •
60 3.45 0.52 3.00
70 3.70 0.60 3.40 • Effective upper limit is 6 (Bouwcr and Rice, 1976)
80 3.90 0.65 3.60
90 4.20 0.70 3.85
100 4.50 0.75 4.20 I ln(Rc/rw)"' { 1.1/ln(Lwlrw)) • {A • Btn[(H·Lw)lrw]}I(Lcirwl J"·l
ISO 5.45 0.98 5.70 1.78
200 6.10 1.20 7.00
250 6.70 1.30 8.00
7.10 1.50
~----------------------------------1
~-----~~----~~----~~------~~ 300 8.80 Where: Lw = H;
400 7.75 1.90 9.90
500 8.20 2.20 10.60
600 8.50 2.33 11.10
ln(Re/rw) = (l.llln(Lwlrw)+C/(Lc/rw)J"·l I
700 8.70 2.50 11.50
800 8.90 2.70 11.80
900 9.00 2.75 12.00
=calculation Not Appropriate (Lw not equal to H)
I
1000 9.20 2.83 12.40
1500 9.50 3.18 12.90
e ercnces: ouwer ( ), ouwer an tee ( 1976) =-=======111
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
LAW ENGINEERING TESTING COMPANY JOBNAME ____ ~U~N~o~w~}~7a~~~7 ____ JOBNO. 5~-f5J~
BY DS~i! siVl r DATE CK _________ DATE _______ SHEET 5 OF_]_
J
. 5
{. J
/.(
i}-· D
~·S
~.o
:?·S
~.o
,LOC.AT/0/..J : !VIMJ-J
1/•L./1 .......... _ ?:'2-~ __ J,O
_ Ill· q1_ _____ ')_• .U. __ • 9£ ..... __ .
I?'. 07 _____ _. 8 'f • 7._y,
11-/·7~ .s;-.11 --·--.. --·---··-_.. ... .. ---.. -
lt./•LPV . :S7
I L{, '-( q . lio ......... -.. ·I--.....
IL/·44 .21 ----.. f-·
-...... ----.. -·.
.. ___ ··-·-··------·---------
-· ---·"' .. --.. --........... ---·
<J,O .
---1-------'--+----+----1--·----.. -· ·-···----·------
··------\------+-----+-----!--· .. ---...... _ -·----·-------------
.. -·-·-· ----------1---·-.. -· ·-----______ .. ___ .. ________ _
-------+-------· .. ·--· .. -··---------r-
··--------·--------· ----. ·--·----........
-----!------+----+------+--____ .. ______ _
---------· --------1----·---r--·------+-----.. ------.. ·-------------
...... -···----------+--............... _ ... ____ -----· _ .. --... -........ , __ --------·-------
---_ .. _,,_ .... ----.. ·-·
··-·--" -----------f-------·--1-------·--
.. ----1----...... --r-·
.. ---------1-------·---
-----------+-------+-----+-----.... _ ... ----·-. ··--.. -··· .. -----
-------1-------!--·"--·--·· .. ----·
----------··
..... -----------·!-----·---+--------1---
·0.':· . :.;;
n.
~-~rltbmic
I
2 Cycles :a: 10 to the inch
I I I
I I
I I I
I I I I
I
' I
'
I
I 0
1
r:·
11'\uf-:3
I
I I I
I I
I I
I I I I
I '
10 11 ., lt.:··· -~~' 1 ..
T/11116, (( ""'"rres)
6w-l./633 ~h!t+ b o+ 1
CoNow ?we. 37o'\l I
I
I
I
I
I
I I I ! ' I
I I
I I
I I I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I( I~ 11. ....
I Sl>ett 1 Ot 7
c.
PROJNAME: \. ()\1uL0 .tt ??V41 PROJ NO: Gi.,_· 4c;;_33. -! I
' I
HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY CALCULATION WORKSHEET ' ! I
' Monitoring Well: MW-3 Prepared by: KM
I Test Date: 12-16-94 Checked by: JLG
Test Type: SLUG-OUT I I
I
I .·.,,, EOUATIONVARIABLES· :'// i i'. I , ··•: •::. ,. EQUATIONS I
I I
rc = 0.083 (fi) rc (adjusted)= 0.24 (!\)
I
n= 0.30 Le/rw-24.84 I
rw= 0.417 (ft) ln(Lw/rw)= 3.21 i
I
Le= 10.36 (ft) ln(Re/rw)= I. 95 (sec below)
I Lw= 10.36 (ft)
H= 50.0 (f\) K -l(rcA2 ln(Re/rw))/2Lcl"(l/t)ln(yo/yt) i
yo= 3.20 (!\) I I yt= 1.00 (ft) K= 4E-t13 (ft/min) I t= 1.5 (min) i
K= ~I An (em/sec ·1
Sand Pack= YES ----~------~---··-_I
I
I
I
I
I
Table of Coefficients (dimensionless) Calculation of Cocffi.ci~.:nts I
----------.. ·-·-·· Value range for Le/R w from Table of Cocllicicnts I
Lc/rw A B c Le/rw I A_ ....... L. 13 .1 ... c i
4 1.75 0.25 0.75 20 2.23 0.29 ··------1:75 i
·---··--· 1.90-i 5 1.76 0.25 0.85 25 2.40 0.31
6 1.77 0.25 0.90 Interpolated Values of A, 13 and C for Lc/Rw I :
I
I
7 1.80 0.25 1.00 24.841 2.391 o_, t I 1.90
8 1.83 0.25 1.10 I
9 1.90 0.25 1.20 I I
10 1.95 0.25 1.30 ' I
15 2.10 0.27 1.50 i
20 2.23 0.29 1.75 Calculation of ln(Re/rw): ' -----
25 2.40 0.31 1.90 l I
30 2.50 0.35 2.10 Where: Lw < H: '
I 40 2.75 0.45 2.45
50 3.00 0.50 2.70 ln((li-Lw)frw)= 6.00 . I
60 3.45 0.52 3.00
70 3.70 0.60 3.40 • Effective upper limit is 6 (Bouwcr and Rice, 1976)
80 3.90 0.65 3.60 i
90 4.20 0.70 3.85 ln(Rc/rw) ::: {I. 11\n(Lwtm)} • {A • Blni(H-Lw)tm·l)i(Lcim} 1"·1 I
100 4.50 0.75 4.20
150 5.45 0.98 5.70 = 1.95
200 6.10 1.20 7.00 .
250 6.70 1.30 8.00 I
300 7.10 1.50 8.80 Where: Lw = H;
400 7.75 1.90 9.90
500 8.20 2.20 10.60 ln(Relrw) :c (1.1/ln(Lwlrw)•C/(Lcirw)j" -I
600 8.50 2.33 11.10 I
700 8.70 2.50 11.50 =Calculalion Nt~_E!2P.rialc (Lw not cguallo H)
800 8.90 2.70 11.80
900 9.00 2.75 12.00 I
1000 9.20 2.83 12.40
1500 9.50 3.18 12.90
c erenccs: ouwcr ( ICC ( I ouwcr an . I
I
FORM 17
LAW
~terr01ne. h~drM lie. gro..dle()t --"
1.0 f-\ I i3f+ ' 0 Ol!oq ft./ ft
i.Oft/12H ·0.0833H/ft.
I. 0 H I '2.4 H' ' il' 041" f+ I H
10 HI Z.S ft ~ o. 04QQ H /H.
A\itrO-ge gro.d1et1t ' O,O(,OS H /ft./
I
JOB NO. 56 -4S'B SHEET I OF _____::2:.___
JOB NAME Conoto j$ 35047
BY l{[fNI DATE _,1+"130~1--"%"-----
CHECKED BY 6i....L.--DATE I /~1/ "}S
Ckknmne. grwnd wo..ftr velou~ :
hydrli.Uill condodWit'{ ( dt-ttrm,r.ed dun119 ~reviDU~ ~eld -ieSt1ng ,SPe Cttto.c.h~d P0-9~
b.l x 10 -b fes ./
) ~
tff"e C.h ve. poru~lfl.j (0-ypi'O'lJ N\O.:ie.t~) : 0 .lo -to 0 >30
~=-(" 1 x m·ow)(O.Obosf!IH.) (bOsec)(born,"H'2.4hr)(3bSdf!.16)
(o. 30) (I rv11r\) ( 1 llr) (I d~) (I~()
Y· 4l.~ f+/~r /
v = (b l x 10 ·"fed (0_()60£ Rift) (bo sec.)(b0mi")(Z41w-) (3bl;doA(s)
(o,to) . (I fnlll)( I hr.) ( 1 cl~) ( \~,..)
v ' b~. q . f+ (~( /
h c.. Cotlduc.tivlt 53. 3 fl. r
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
:.I
I
I
I
I
I
I
!:! ~ ~ ~ :8
\
\
/
/
\
\
\
\
\
\
~
85
~
(84. 1 6)
0
MW-2
88
~ REF.: SITEPl.AN BY caroco. SHEET NO.-33047, DAl[l) 1D-29-92.
. -?
'
-
. <a~,\
~ \
/ ,/
/
EXPLANATION
--· .lg--PROPERTY UNE
.z
~-----------; APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF I I !... __________ 1 UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANKS
~~:>:--<<1 AREAS WITH CONCRETE COVER
6 PUMP ISLAND (NUMBER)
----· CEDAR PRIVACY FENCE
0 TYPE II MONITORING WELL
0 TYPE Ill MONITORING WELL
• MONITORING WELL INSTALLED BY OTHERS
•
(85.21)
85------
APPROXIMATE LOCATION
OF FREE PRODUCT COLLECTION WELL
GENERAUZED GROUND-WATER
FLOW DIRECTION
GROUND-WATER ELEVATION (FT., 12/16/94)
GROUND-WATER CONTOUR (FT., 12/16/94)
0
.APPBOIIII.t.ft SCALI Ill J'DT
NOTES:
1) GROUND-WATER MEASUREt.AENTS
MADE IN WELLS ON DECEMBER 16, 1994. 1--------------------1
2) DEEP TYPE Ill WELL. MW-5, NOT
USED IN CONTOURING.
3) CONTOUR INTERVAL = 1.0 FT.
4) GROUND-WATER ELEVATIONS REFERENCED
TO AN ASSUMED SITE DATUM (TOP OF
CASING MW-7 = 100.00 FT.)
GROUND-WATER CONTOUR MAP
CONOCO STORE NO. 33047
1122 NORTH RAlEIGH ST. -ROCKY MOUNT, N.C.
PREPARED
BY
JOB NO.
DAlE
56-4533
DAlE
RGURE 12