RA-1530_9807_CA_RPTS_19920910

RICHMOND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
Environmental Consulting Assessment & Remediation Services
September 10, 1992
Mr. Nile Testerman
Groundwater Section
3800 Barrett Drive
Raleigh, North Carolina 27609
RECEIVED
SEP 1 1 1992
DEHNR-RAL RO
RE: Initial Site Characterization Report
Holland BP Facility
Wilson, NC/ Wilson County
Dear Mr. Testerman:
Richmond Environmental Services, Inc. is pleased to submit for your review the
attached Initial Site Characterization Report prepared for the subject facility and
submitted on behalf of Comer Oil Co. of Rocky Mount, NC.
This report has been prepared and submitted in response to Section .0705 of the NC
Underground Storage Tank regulations (NCAC Title 15A Subchapter 2N). This report
was required under the Notice of Regulatory Requirements issued to Comer Oil
Company and dated August 13, 1992
A Comprehensive Site Assessment report is being prepared and shall be submitted to
your office no later than October 18, 1992 in compliance with the above referenced
notice.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please contact me at [phone].
Sincerely,
RICHMOND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
Martin R. Richmond
Project Manager
cc: Mr. H.C. Shearin, Comer Oil Company
P.O. Box 5336 Raleigh, North Carolina 27650 [phone]
RICHMOND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
Environmental Consulting Assessment & Remediation Services
INITIAL SITE CHARACTERIZATION REPORT
HOLLAND BP FACILITY
WILSON, NC/ WILSON COUNTY SEP 1 1 W92
dehnr-ral RO
1,0 Introduction
This Initial Site Characterization report has been prepared for Comer Oil Co., Inc. of
Rocky Mount, NC in response to a release detected from a Commercial Underground
Storage Tank system, in accordance with NCAC Title 15A Subchapter 2N Sections
.0702-.0704 pertaining to Initial Response, Initial Abatement Measures with Site Check
and Initial Site Characterization.
2.0 Nature and Quantity of Release
The presence of a release of a petroleum product was initially suspected at the site in
January of 1991 during permanent closure of four underground storage tanks. Closure
operations were conducted by Mangum Oil Spill Response, Inc. of Wilson, NC.
Petroleum odors were reportedly encountered during the excavation and removal of the
UST system. Laboratory analysis of soil samples collected during closure operations
indicated the presence of total petroleum hydrocarbons at levels ranging up to 130 parts
per million.
The release is believed to be the result of leakage from the UST System in use at the
facility. A descriptive summary of this system is presented in Table 1. The UST
System is registered as a Commercial Underground Storage Tank system with the NC
Division of Environmental Management (Facility ID #0-(X)5140) and all operating fees
paid in full.
Table 1. Descriptive Summary of UST System
Tank Size Date Date Status Product
No.Installed Removed
1 2000 5/12/61 1/15/91 P Gasoline
2 2000 5/12/61 1/15/91 P Gasoline
3 2000 5/12/61 1/15/91 P Gasoline
4 550 5/12/61 1/15/91 P MotorOil
5 3000 5/12/61 5/1/81 P Gasoline
P.O.Box 5336 Raleigh, North Carolina 27650 [phone]
Initial Site Characterization Report
Holland BP Facility
August 31, 1992
No estimated quantity of release is available due to the unknown duration of the
release. The release is confined to the subsurface of the site, with no exposed threats to
the surrounding population.
3.0 General Site Description
The facility is a former retail petroleum outlet and automotive service station located at
the intersection of US Highway 301 South and Goldsboro Road in Wilson, NC in
Wilson County. A location map is presented in Figure 1 attached.
There are two former UST system locations at the site with two associated dispenser
islands. One system located on the western side of the property, consists of three tanks
of unknown size or product type. This system is considered to be essentially
abandoned and has been in place for an unknown period of time. The other system,
located on the eastern side of the property is owned and operated by Comer Oil Co.,
Inc. of Rocky Mount, NC is the above referenced system closed in January of 1991. A
diagram of the facility is shown in Figure 2.
The site is situated in an urban setting, with private businesses surrounding the facility.
Two parcels of undeveloped land are located near the site. No other known UST
Facilities are located in the immediate surrounding area. No private residences are
located within a 1500 foot radius of the site.
Water and sewer service for area is supplied by the Wilson County Public Works
Department. No potable wells have been identified in the area during a visual search.
Underground utilities are located along both Hwy. 301 and Goldsboro Road. Overhead
power and telephone lines are present at various locations across the site.
4,0 Results of the Site Check
During the UST Closure operations samples were collected from the area beneath the
former tank locations. Laboratory analysis of these soil samples revealed the presence
of petroleum hydrocarbons at ranges up to 130 parts per million (ppm).
In March of 1992 groundwater samples were collected from three groundwater
monitoring wells located at the facility. Laboratory analysis of groundwater samples
indicated benzene presence of 200 parts per billion (ppb). Analysis of groundwater
samples taken from monitoring well MW-1 in May of 1992 indicated benzene presence
of 120 ppb.
Additional work was initiated at the site in June of 1992 when personnel from
Richmond Environmental Services, Inc. of Raleigh, NC mobilized to the site for the
Page 2
Initial Site Characterization Report
Holland BP Facility
August 31, 1992
purpose of installing soil borings and additional monitoring wells. This work was
conducted to determine potential source areas around the UST system and collect data
to be used in the delineation of the extent of soil and groundwater contamination
present.
A total of seven soil borings were installed around the site using a 3 1/4" stainless steel
hand auger. Four borings were installed in the areas of the two former pump islands
and advanced to a depth of six feet. Two borings were installed in the area of the
abandoned tanks and advanced to a depth of nine feet. One boring was installed in this
area to a depth of three feet and terminated upon auger refusal.
Soil samples were collected from each boring at three foot intervals. The samples were
logged and placed in clear ziplock plastic bags. After a standing time of at least 15
minutes, the samples were screened for the presence of organic vapors using a Foxboro
OVA 128 instrument. The results of the field screening of the soil samples is shown
in Table 2.
Table 2. Summary of Field Screening Results of Soil Samples
Sample No.Depth OVA
Reading
Sample No.Depth OVA
Reading
HA-IA*3 1000 HA-5A A/R N/A
HA-IB 6 1000 HA-6A 3 <2
HA-2A 3 1000 HA-6B 6 22
HA-2B*6 1000 HA-6C 9 18
HA-3A 3 <2 HA-7A 3 <2
HA-3B 6 <2 HA-7B*6 <2
HA-4A*3 <2 HA-7C 9 36
HA-4B 6 <2
All depths are in feet
OVA Readings are in Parts Per Million
* = samples submitted for Laboratory Analysis
Four of the soil samples were transferred to precleaned glass jars, labeled and place on
ice for storage. The samples were delivered on July 6, 1992 to GeoChem, Inc. of
Morrisville, NC for analysis.
Two additional groundwater monitoring wells were installed in June of 1992 in order to
determine potential contaminated zones and establish upgradient potential.
Page 3
Initial Site Characterization Report
Holland BP Facility
August 31, 1992
All wells were installed in accordance with all NC Well Construction Standards under
Well Construction Permit No. 97-0200-WM-0113. The wells were constructed of 2
inch diameter PVC casing with slotted screens, bolted covers and locking caps. The
relative elevations of each monitoring well was measured using an established data
plane of 100 feet and distances to each well measured.
On July 6, 1992 groundwater samples were collected from all five monitoring wells at
the facility. The depth to groundwater was measured in each well prior to sampling.
Each well was then purged of three times the water volume and samples collected,
transferred to precleaned glass bottles, labeled and placed on ice for storage. The
samples were delivered on July 6, 1992 to GeoChem, Inc. of Morrisville, NC for
analysis.
All soil samples were analyzed using EPA Method 5030 for total petroleum
hydrocarbons in the Class 1 fuel range. Results of laboratory analysis indicate elevated
presence of petroleum constituents in Sample HA-IA and Sample HA-2B. All other
sample results were below detection limits. A table showing the soil sample analytical
results is presented in Table 3.
Table 3. Results of Laboratory Analysis of Soil Samples
Sample No.TPH
Results
Sample No.TPH
Results
HA-IA 40 HA-4A BDL
HA-2B 35 HA-7B BDL
All Results are Presented in Parts Per Million (ppm)
bdl = Below Detection Limit of 1.0 ppm
All groundwater samples were analyzed using EPA Methods 602 for volatile organic
compounds and EPA Method 610 for semivolatile organic compounds. Results of
laboratory analysis of the groundwater samples indicate elevated presence of petroleum
compounds in monitoring well MW-1. Samples collected from other wells indicated
lower levels of compounds. No presence of chlorinated compounds was detected in
any of the wells. A table showing the groundwater sample analytical results is
presented in Table 4.
The relative depth to groundwater was calculated for each well using the established
benchmark of 100 feet. These depths were then plotted on a site map, and an estimated
direction of groundwater flow derived based on this data. From the information
obtained the groundwater flow direction at the site is estimated to be in a north to
Page 4
Initial Site Characterization Report
Holland BP Facility
August 31, 1992
northwest general direction. The calculated groundwater measurements are presented
in Table 5. The estimated groundwater flow direction is presented in Figure 3.
Table 4. Results of Laboratory Analysis of Groundwater Samples
Parameter MW-1 MW-2 MW-3 MW-4 MW-5 Standard
Benzene 2200 4.4 2.3 1.5 BDL 1.0
Toluene 960 3.6 1.3 1.1 BDL 1000
Ethyl benzene 100 0.69 BDL BDL BDL 29
Xylenes 400 2.6 1.1 2.5 BDL 400
MTBE 140 1.4 120 5.3 11 50
All results are in parts per billion (ppb)
BDL == Below Detection Limit of 0.5 ppb
Table 5. Groundwater Measurements and Calculated Elevations
Monitoring
WeU
Top of
Casing
Depth to
Water
Groundwater
Elevation
MW-1 99.46 6.62 92.84
MW-2 98.24 5.45 92.79
MW-3 95.60 5.36 90.24
MW-4 100.24 7.35 92.89
MW-5 93.66 6.21 87.45
All Measurements are in Feet
No exposed release is present at the site. The release does not appear to have caused
any hazards of fire or vapor explosion nor are any structures at threat from vapors. No
exposed soil has been excavated and stockpiled on the site.
5.0 Results of Free Product Check
No free product has been detected in any of the monitoring wells at the facility. A
temporary observation well installed for the purpose of inspected for free product
presence showed none.
Page 5
Initial Site Characterization Report
Holland BP Facility
August 31, 1992
6.0 Conclusions
A release of petroleum product has occurred and impacted the soil and groundwater at
the site.
The release most probably is the result of leakage from an underground storage tank
system formerly in use at the site. The system was permanently closed and taken out
of service in January of 1991.
Contaminated soil is present in the area around the former dispenser island located near
the front of the facility. No contaminated soil was encountered on the northwestern
part of the property where three abandoned tanks and a dispenser island are located.
Contaminated groundwater was encountered around the area between the former UST
location and the associated dispenser island. Groundwater samples from wells located
around the site indicate the contamination appears to be limited to this area. Soil
samples collected from beneath the UST system during closure operations were taken
from below the measured groundwater table. It is therefore assumed that groundwater
contamination exists in this area.
The average groundwater depth ranges from approximately 5 to 8 feet across the site.
Groundwater flow direction is estimated to be in a Northwest/North direction.
No immediate threat to the surrounding population appears to be present at the site as a
result of the release.
7.0 Recommendatioiis
It is the recommendation of Richmond Environmental Services, Inc. that the following
actions be undertaken at the site:
1. Preparation of a Comprehensive Site Assessment Report
This report is required by NC DEM at any facility exhibiting potential
contamination above NC soil and groundwater standards.
2. Installation of Additional Monitoring Wells
Two additional monitoring wells and one deep cased Type 111 monitoring well
should be installed at the site. The data obtained from these wells, combined with
the wells already established on site will provide more insight into the extent and
migration pathway of any contaminated groundwater.
Page 6
Initial Site Characterization Report
Holland BP Facility
August 31, 1992
3. Contracting of a Hydrogeologic Assessment Report
This report will detail aquifer parameters as required for the Comprehensive Site
Assessment report and will provide information on groundwater flow rates and
potential gradients.
4. A Complete Historical Review of the Facility and the Surrounding Area
This should be performed to ensure that no liability is being assumed by Comer Oil
Co. which may be the result of other sources of contamination.
In addition, it is recommended that a copy of this report be submitted to the
Groundwater Section of the NC Division of Environmental Management Raleigh
Regional Office. This report meets all requirements set forth in the Notice of
Regulatory Requirements issued for this site pertaining to Initial Site Characterization
reporting.
Page 7
FIGURES
.■■-Vi>. ,
. ''-W."
wuMv re fACLsrr
HULXT
AR8ENS
E«:*fCL
QUAIL
R1D6E
ARRiG
ARK
Wilson
Wilson County
North Carolina
Pi^e I
HOLUANP &P FACUITY
Uoc«tiofi
RICHMOND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES. INC.
Raleigh, North Carolina
UoMtvn
HI6HWAY 3(91
Appro)(\mate
Property
Domdar^
• - MonXorin^ Wol
4 ' H«wl Au^
NOTE: pTiivffi^ Nbt to *Ocde
Fi^e 2
HOLLANP tr FACt-lTY
PtA^fln
RICHMOND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
Raleigh, North Carolina
E*t. dW
Pfrwtion
MV-5
MV-9
<1024
d7.49
MV-4<12^4
A£prc>ximdte
rr<?perty
• - ^nitorn^ W0I
U'b HI6HWAY 3(91
67.49 ' OrounJkatcr 3nat\on (Foex)
NOTE Pp«»h^ N^t to ^cJe
F'l^ire 3
HOUUAISC) e>P FACL.ITY
E^tituited CrounJttater Fb« Pirectbn
RICHMOND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES. INC.
Raleigh, North Carolina
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
Sv'T :
?;v k\\'k -. -f- r j -Vr ^-•♦ w 'o »•
GeoChem, Incorporated
Environmental Laboratories
July 23, 1992
Mr. Martin Richmond
Richmond Environmental Services
P.O. Box 5336
Raleigh, NC 27650
Reference: Holland BP
GCI# 9207-017
Dear Mr. Martin Richmond:
This is the analytical report for the above referenced
project. On July 7, 1992 we received four soil samples for
analysis. The analytical and quality control results are presehted
in separate tables for your convenience. Brief summaries of
analytical methods employed are as follows.
TPH
Samples are analyzed by following the California U.S.T.
manual. This methodology incorporates EPA purge and trap (meth.
5030) techniques for analysis of volatile fuels such as gasoline.
Less volatile fuels such as diesel fuel and Icerosene must be
extracted using solvents prior to analysis (soils are sonicated,
meth. 3550). A standard calibration curve is created from the pure
fuel of interest. The standards serve two functions; they create
a "finger print" pattern for comparisons and they allow the chemist
to calculate the concentration of that fuel analyzed for.
If there are any technical questions please feel free to call
me at 919-460-8093. Thank you for allowing GioCrbm to serve your
analytical needs.
Sincer^y,
Gokel
President
2500 Gate Way Centre Blvd., Suite 300 • Morrisville, NC 27560
Telephone: [phone] • FAX: [phone]
GeoChem, Incorporated
Environmental Laboratories
Geochein(NC #336/SC #99008)
Project#9207-017
LAB ID.
DATE SAMPLED
FIELD ID.
MBTROD
ANALYTE
TPH/9«s
2995
7/01/92
HA-IA
mo/ko tyil
40 2.0
Site Name Holland BP
2996
6/30/92
HA-2B
2997
7/01/92
HA-4A
mo/ko pol mo/ko oal
35 5.7 BDL 1.0
LAB ID.
DATE SAMPLED
FIELD ID.
2998
7/01/92
HA-7B
KBTHOD
ANALYTE
Tra/9a«
mo/ko PQl
BDL 1,0
soil water
parts per million « otg/kg ag/1
parts per billion • ug/kg ug/1
pql = practical qusntitation limit due to matrix effects,
bdl = below method detection limit,
bql = below quentitation limit.
2500 Gate Way Centre Blvd., Suite 300 • MorrievHIe. NO 27500
Telephone: 919-40QB093 • FAX: 91^46CK)167
GeoChem, Incorporated
Environmental Laboratories
QUALITY CONTROL RESULTS
METHOD
TPH/gas
RECOVERY
83 %
METHOD
DETECTION LIMIT
1.0 ppm
lEWEDflB
REVIEWED BY
2500 Gate Way Centre Blvd., Suite 300 • Morrisville, NO 27560
Telephone: 91&460-6093 • FAX: [phone]
■?-o. ;?/r r? 51
GeoChem, Incorporated
A <«» j <5^r NC ficfo
Environmental Laboratories
2500 Gate Way Centre Blvd., Suite 300
Morrisville, NO 27560
Chain of Custody Record
Bill To:1\'[
Page of
PROJECT SITt PC#
ON . FOSRENIATNOC REPNOITACOL
// GeoChem PROJiEC^# ^ A-n a/-?/ / ^9^01- 611
SITE NAME / / c^8-9a/ VERBAL / FAX / HARDCOPY
FIELD
SAMPLE ID
TURNAROt/ND
IN DAYS
SAMPLE
MATRIX
DATE
COLLECTED
ytvV / LAB ID NO./ REMARKS ffor /ab use onM
//4- //f //'i.t
1 (. h" h'1
7/' /4l /:: 3,m-/ .
HA -7?I 7/, /u (
REMARKS RELINQUiSHED BY
iEIYED BY:
. .d'Reived by:DATE
TIME
TIME
RELINQUISHED BY:
REUNQUISHED BY:
DATE
DATE
TIME
TIME
RECEIVED BY:
RECEIVED BY:
DATE EUNQUISHED BY:TIME
TIMEDATE REUNQUISHED BY:
DATE
DATE
TIME
lZLL
TIME
TIME
This Chain of Custody is considered a written contract to perform the services requested In the analyses section of this document.
^ N<
GeoChem, Incorporated
Environmental Laboratories
July 24, 1992
Mr. Martin Richmond
Richmond Environmental Services, Inc.
P.O. Box 5336
Raleigh, NC 27650
Reference: Holland BP Facility
GCI# 9207-013
Dear Mr. Martin Richmond:
This is the analytical report for the above referenced
project. On July 6, 1992 we received five water samples, for
analysis. The analytical and quality control results are presented
in separate tables for your convenience. Brief summaries of
analytical methods employed are as follows.
EPA method 602
Samples are loaded into a specially designed purging chamber
at ambient temperature. Helium is bubbled through the sample.
This drives the organics onto a sorbent trap. Once purging has
been completed the sorbent column is rapidly heated. This
efficiently transfers the organics into the gas chromatograph which
separates the components of the sample. The purgeable organics are
then detected using flame ionization and photo ionization
detectors.
2500 Gate Way Centre Blvd., Suite 300 • Morriaville, NC 27560
Telephone: 919460B093 • FAX: 919-46CM)167
GeoChem, Incorporated
Environmental Laboratories
PAH (EPA Method 610)
This method covers the determination of certain polynuclear
aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH). A measured volume of sample,
approximately one liter, is extracted with raethylene chloride using
a separatory funnel or a continuous liquid to liquid extractor.
The methylene chloride extract is then analyzed by gas
chromatography using a flame ionization detector for compound
identification.
If there are any technical questions please feel free to call
me at 919-460-8093. Thank you for allowing GboChbm to serve your
analytical needs.
Sincerely,
Goxel
President
2500 Gate Way Centre Blvd., Suite 300 • Morrisville, NO 27560
Telephone: [phone] • FAX: [phone]
GeoChem, Incorporated
Environmental Laboratories
Geochem (NC #336/SC #99008)
Project#9207-013 Site Name Holland BP
LAB ID.2980 2981 2982
DATE SAMPLED 7/06/92 7/06/92 7/06/92
FIELD ID.MW-1 MW-2 MW-3
NBTBOD
ANALYTE uq/1 pqr ua/1 pql uo/l txrl
BPA 602
Benzene 2200 5.0 4.4 0.5 2.3 0.5
Toluene 960 3.6 1.3
Chlorobenzene BQL BDL BDL
Ethylbenzene 100 0.69 BDL
Xylenes 400 2.6 1.1
1,3 Dichlorobenzene BQL BDL BDL •
1,4 Dichlorobenzene BQL BDL BDL
1,2 Dichlorobenzene BQL BDL BDL
NTBB 140 10 1.4 1.0 120 1.0
LAB ID.2983 2984
DATE SAMPLED 7/06/92 7/06/92
FIELD ID.MW-4 MW-5
MBTHQD
ANALYTE ua/1 pq;uo/l -.sal
BPA 602
Benzene 1.5 0.5 BDL 0.5
Toluene 1.1 BDL
Chlorobenzene BDL BDL
Ethylbenzene BDL BDL
Xylenes 2.5 BDL
1,3 Dichlorobenzene BDL BDL
1,4 Dichlorobenzeoo BDL BDL
1,2 Dichlorobenzene BDL BDL
MTBB 5.3 1.0 11 1.0
soil water
parts per million = otg/kg mg/1
parts per billion = ug/kg ug/1
pql » practical quantitation limit due to matrix effects*
bdl = below method detection limit,
bql = below quantitation limit.
2500 Gate Way Centre Blvd.* Suite 300 • Monleville, NC 27560
Telephone: [phone] • FAX: [phone]
GeoChem, Incorporated
Environmental Laboratories
Geochem (NC #336/SC /99008)
Project#9207-013 Site Neane Holland BP
LAB ID.
DATE SAMPLED
FIELD ID.
2980
7/06/92
MW-1
2981
7/06/92
MW-2
2982
7/06/92
MW-3
MBTBOD
ANALYTE
610
m/l Mfl/1 jsajL
Naphthalene BQL 1.0 BDL 1.0 BDL
Acenaphthylene BDL BDL BDL
Acenaphthene BDL BDL BDL
Fluorene BQL BDL BDL
Phenanthrene 1.3 BDL BDL
Anthracene BDL BDL BDL
Fluoranthene BDL BDL BDL
Pyrene BDL BDL BDL
Benzo(a)anthracene BDL BDL BDL ^
Chrysene BDL BDL BDL
Benzofluoranthenes BDL BDL BDL
Benzo(a)pyrene BDL BDL BDL
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyreneBDL BDL BDL
Dibenzo(a,h)anthraceneBDL BDL BDL
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene BDL BDL BDL
LAB ID.2983 2984
DATE SAMPLED 7/06/92 7/06/92
FIELD ID.MW-4 MW-5
1.0
MITBOD
ANALYTE
610
tfq/1 MflZl.J22l
u
Naphthalene BDL 1.0 BQL
Acenaphthylene BDL 2.0
Acenaphthene BDL BDL
Fluorene BDL 2.4
Pheneinthrene BDL BDL
Anthracene BDL BDL
Fluoranthene BDL BDL
Pyrene BDL BDL
Benzo (a) anthracexie BDL BDL
Chryeene BDL BDL
Benzofluoranthenes BDL BDL
Benzo(a)pyrene BDL BDL
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyreneBDL BDL
Dibenzo(a,h)anthraceneBDL BDL
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene BDL BDL
1.0
J[2il
pajrtB per million - ntg/kg atg/1
part a per billion - ug/kg ug/1
pql > practical quantltatlon limit due to matrix effecta.
bql n below quantltatlon limit.
2500 Qate Way Cwitra Blvd.. Suita 300 • MorrtovWe. NC 27560
Tolephone: 919-466-8093 • FAX: [phone]
r GeoChem, incorporated
Environmental Laboratories
QQIOJTY CONTROL RESULTS
METHOD
602
Benzene
Toluene
Chlorobenzene
Ebhylbenzene
Xylenes
1.3-Dichlorobenzene
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
1.4-Dichlorobenzene
MTBE
RECOVERY
109 %
93 %
93 %
94 %
95 %
96 %
96 %
97 %
92 %
METHOD
DETECTION LIMIT
0.5 ppb
1.0 ppb
1 610
r
Naphthalene
Acenaphthene
Phenanthrene
62 %
68 %
90 %
1.0 ppb
RSVISMBD/B
REVIBNED BY
\/s .g.
2S00 Qsto Way Centra Blvd., Suite 300 • MorrtevWe, NO 27560
Telephone: 91»46I>S003 • FAX: [phone]
Report To:
ictvici Sj'f.
7.0, Zix At 4
GeoChem, Incorporated
//^
BIHTo:
Environ 1 L g t> 6 r a >t,o ties
t/C 7 A
2500 300
V. VA
iwl®.pfe^pET
• <'' I w''P I'l' , I' ■' "
' I -I ' / j«' iChain of Cu^pdy RPcord
1^kALYS£SPROJECT SUE
ITE HAME
CTEaBY
flELD
SAMPLE ID
T)/RNAROUND
IN DAYS
SAMPLE
MATRIX
DATE
COLLECTED REMARKS
AtU/ ^ /
hedwH 7REMARKSREUNQUISHED
ElVED BY REUNQUISHED BY DATE RECEIVED BY REUNQUISHED BY:DATE
RECEIVED BY:REUNQUISHED BY:DATE RECEIVED BY:DATE REUNQUISHED BY:DATE
This Chain of Custody Is considered a written contract to perform the services requested In the analyses section of this document
I ^No,j I ] (31) 3n i3j rjTi izzi! izii; :Zii ':zi] :izii ■( :k