RA-1530_9807_CA_RPTS_19901030

RICHMOND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
Environmental Consulting Assessment & Remediation Services
COMPREHENSIVE SITE ASSESSMENT REPORT
HOLLAND BP FACILITY
WILSON, NORTH CAROLINA
Prepared Fon
Comer Oil Company
1553 South Church Street
Rocky Mount, North Carolina
P.O. Box 5336 • Raleigh, North Carolina 27650 • [phone]
RICHMOND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
Environmental Consulting Assessment & Remediation Services
PFCFIVPn
NOV 1 2 1992
DEHNR-RAL RC
COMPREHENSIVE SITE ASSESSMENT REPORT
HOLLAND BP FACILITY
WILSON, NORTH CAROLINA
Prepared Fon
Comer Oil Company
1553 South Church Street
Rocky Mount, North Carolina
By:
RICHMOND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
Martin R. Richmond
Project Manager
October 30, 1990
P.O. Box 5336 • Raleigh, North Carolina 27650 • [phone]
RICHMOND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
Environmental Consulting Assessment & Remediation Services
COMPREHENSIVE SITE ASSESSMENT REPORT
HOLLAND BP FACILITY
WILSON, NORTH CAROLINA
1.0 INTRODUCTION
Tliis Comprehensive Site Assessment Report has been prepared by Richmond
Environmental Services, Inc. on behalf of Comer Oil Company of Rocky Moimt, NC.
This report is submitted in response to a release of petroleum products from a
commercial underground storage tank system as required under NC Administrative
Code Title ISA Subchapter 2N Section .0705
It is the purpose of this report to characterize and define the extent of soil and
groundwater contamination present at the subject facility and examine potential
migration pathways and exposure risks. The information contained in this report shall
be used to as a basis for the development of a Corrective Action Plan for restoring the
ariected areas at the site.
Included in this report are sections detailing the site history, contaminant source
inventory, potential receptors and site utilities, site topography and surface water, site
soils and hydrogeology, extent of soil contamination, extent of groimd water
contamination, preliminary exposure assessment, preliminary remedial alternatives, and
conclusions and recommendations.
2-0 SITE HISTORY
The subject facility is a former retail petroleum outlet and automotive service station
located at the intersection of NC Highway 301 South and Goldsboro Road in the City
of Wilson, NC in Wilson Coimty. A Site Location Map is presented in Figure 1.
No definitive date could be est^lished as to when the Holland BP Facility began
operation. It is known from the UST registration records that the facility has been in
operation at least since 1961, this being the year that the registered UST system was
installed.
In April 1990 an Environmental Site Assessment was performed at the facility by
UTTS, Inc. of Greenville, NC. This assessment consisted of the collection of soil
samples and installation and sampling of three ground water mmiitoring wells. The
results of the assessment indicate no evidence of soil or ground water contamination at
P.O. Box 5336 • Raleigh, North Carolina 27650 • [phone]
Comprehensive Site Assessment
Holland BP Facility
October 30, 1992
the site. A closure letter was sent to Comer Oil Company from the NC Division of
Environmental Management stating that the site was considered closed.
Operating under the report that no contamination was present at the facility, Comer Oil
Company in January 1991 contracted with Mangum Oil Spill Resources, Inc. of
Wilson, NC for the removal of five commercial underground storage tanks at the site.
In accordance with NC Division of Environmental Management guidelines for UST
system closure, soil samples were collected from the base of the excavation of the UST
storage area.
Laboratory analysis of these soil samples revealed the presence of total petroleum
hydrocarbons at levels up to 130 parts per million (ppm). Further assessment of the
potential contamination present at the site was requested by NC Division of
Environmental Management.
In accordance with the NC DEM request, ground water samples were collected in
March 1992 from the three ground water monitoring wells previously installed at the
facility. Laboratory analysis of groundwater samples indicated benzene presence of 200
parts per billion (ppb) in one monitoring well. Analysis of groundwater samples taken
from the same monitoring well in May 1992 indicated benzene presence of 120 ppb.
Copies of these laboratory results, as well as copies of the UTTS, Inc. Environmental
Site Assessment Report and the Mangum Oil Spill Resources, Inc. UST Closure Report
are presented in Appendix A.
The formal assessment of the contaminant presence continued in June 1992 when
Richmond Environmental Services, Inc. was contracted by Comer Oil Company to
prepare an Initial Site Characterization Report. This work was conducted to determine
potential source areas around the UST system and collect data to be used in the
delineation of the extent of soil and ground water contamination present at the site.
This report was submitted to the NC Division of Environmental Management in
September 1992. The data presented at that time is included as part of this report.
3.0 CONTAMINANT SOURCE INVENTORY
The contamination present at the site is believed to be the result of leakage of
petroleum products from an underground storage tank system formerly in use at the
facility. The UST system owned by Comer Oil Company of Rocky Mount, NC is
registered as a Commercial Underground Storage Tank system with the NC Division of
Environmental Management (Facility ID #0-(X)5140). All necessary operating fees
have been paid in full. A summary of this system is presented in Table 1.
Page 2
Comprehensive Site Assessment
Holland BP Facility
October 30, 1992
A second UST system is located in the northwestern area of the property and consists
of three tanks of unconfirmed size or product type. This system is reported by UTTS,
Inc. to consist of two 550 gallon gasoline tanks and one 1000 gallon waste oil tank.
No information is available pertaining to any associated piping. It is believed that the
dispenser island located in this area served this UST system when in operation.
The tanks comprising this second UST system were permanently closed in place by
UTTS, Inc. following the site assessment conducted in April 1990. It is believed that
this UST system has not been used since 1961, when the current UST system was
installed. This system was never operated by Comer Oil Company and is considered to
be abandoned.
Also reported by UTTS, Inc. to be present at the facility is one 550 gallon heating oil
tank. This tank is reported to be present directly behind the existing building, however
no evidence of this tank was encountered during this assessment. The facility is
currently served by Natural Gas from the Public Service Company of NC, which is
used for heating purposes.
A facility diagram showing the former UST system location and other potential source
areas is presented in Figure 2.
4.0 POTENTIAL RECEPTORS AND SITE UTILITIES
The site is situated in an urban setting, with private businesses surrounding the facility.
Two parcels of undeveloped land are located near the site. No other known UST
facilities are located in the immediate surrounding area. No private residences are
located within a 1500 foot radius of the site.
Water and sewer service for area is supplied by the Wilson County Public Works
Department. No potable wells have been identified in the area during a visual search.
Underground utilities are located along both US Highway 301 and Goldsboro Road.
Overhead power and telephone lines are present at various locations across the site.
5.0 SITE TOPOGRAPHY AND SURFACE WATER
5.1 Site Topography
Topography at the site is generally sloped in a southerly to northerly trend, with the
roadway of US Highway 301 elevated as the highest point at the facility. Site drainage
Page 3
Comprehensive Site Assessment
Holland BP Facility
October 30, 1992
follows this trend and utilizes drainage ditches located in the rear of the property and
along Goldsboro Road on the eastern side of the property.
The southern and eastern portions of the facility are covered with asphalt and concrete,
with grass medians located along the roadways. The western and northern portions of
the facility consist of unpaved gravel with grassy areas in non-traffic zones. The
former UST storage area is located adjacent to the western side of the existing building
and is composed of sand backfill.
5.2 Regional Topography
The regional topography of the area is generally flat. Predominant drainage in the area
is by a network of storm sewer lines and drainage ditches located along roadways and
property lines.
There are no established surface water bodies near the facility. An unnamed
intermittent stream runs parallel to Goldsboro Road approximately 700 feet west of die
site. This intermittent stream in turn joins another to create an unnamed stream at a
point approximately 3100 feet from the facility (this unnamed stream is the nearest
surface water to the site). This unnamed stream drains into Wiggins Mill Reservoir at
a point approximately 7100 feet from the site.
A USGS 7.5 minute topographic map of the area showing these points is presented in
Figure 3.
6.0 SITE SOILS AND HYDROGEOLOGY
A series of four soil borings were installed at the site during assessment operations in
June and September of 1992. These borings were installed using hollow stem auger
drilling procedures by a truck mounted drill rig, with the borings converted to ground
water monitoring wells.
The data collected from these borings, along with information presented in the well
construction records prepared for the monitoring wells installed in April of 1990, was
used to prepare a description of the underlying soil structure at the site. A geologic
description of the area prepared by UTTS, Inc. in April of 1990 was used to
summarize the geologic conditions at the facility and contrast these conditions to the
findings of the soil borings.
The data collected from measurements of ground water elevations from all monitoring
wells was used to prepare a description of the ground water contour at the site. A
Page 4
Comprehensive Site Assessment
Holland BP Facility
October 30, 1992
series of slug tests were performed on all monitoring wells at the facility by
Environmental Investigations, Inc. of Durham, NC. The data from these tests was
used to prepare an evaluation of the aquifer characteristics at the site.
6.1 Site Soils and Regional Geology
The general soil conditions at the site are best described as silty sand and sandy clay.
Underlying the asphalt and gravel cover at the site is a consistent layer of sand
intermixed slightly with fine silt. Underlying this sand material is a moist gray silty
clay and sand mix overlying a find dense light gray clay material. The soil boring
records are presented in Appendix B. A diagram showing the location of the soil
borings is presented in Figure 4. A lithographic diagram of the soil structure based on
these soil boring records is presented in Figure 5.
The site is situated in the eastern Coastal Plain physiographic province of North
Carolina in central Wilson County. The Coastal Plain province is composed of
exposed non-marine to marine sediments and sedimentary rocks of the Cretaceous to
Quartemary age. In Wilson County these include Quartemary surficial deposits,
Pliocene Yorktown Formation and Cretaceous Cape Fear Formation.
The soils encountered during the installation of the soil borings appear to be consistent
with the typical materials of the Quartemary deposits and the Yorktown formation. No
bedrock material was encountered during the assessment.
6.2 Site Hydrogeology
A series of six shallow monitoring wells and one deep Type III monitoring well have
been installed at the site. Three monitoring wells designated MW-1, MW-2 and MW-3
were installed during the April 1990 assessment. Two monitoring wells designated
MW-4 and MW-5 were installed in June 1992 and two monitoring wells designated
MW-6 and DW-1 were installed in September 1992.
All monitoring wells were installed in accordance with NC Division of Environmental
Management Well Construction Standards as established under NCAC Title 15A
Subchapter 2C. All equipment used in the installation of the monitoring wells was
decontaminated between all borings to prevent cross contamination. Well Construction
Records for all monitoring wells at the site are presented in Appendix C. A diagram
showing the location of all monitoring wells is presented in Figure 6.
The ground water elevation in each monitoring well was measured in July, September
and October 1992. These elevations were measured from a fixed measuring point on
Page 5
Comprehensive Site Assessment
Holland BP Facility
October 30, 1992
the top of each well casing. These elevation of measuring point was then established
relative to an assumed benchmark elevation of 100 feet. The calculated ground water
elevations from data collected in July, September and October 1992 is summarized in
Table 2.
Ground water appears to flow generally in a west to northwest direction across the site.
This was determined using a typical triangulation technique for all wells at the site
assuming linear digression along each axis. The relative ground water contours were
then calculated from algebraic interpolation of data points along known measured
distances between the wells. A diagram showing the general ground water contour
based on the September 1992 data is presented in Figure 7.
In October 1992, a series of bail tests were conducted on all monitoring wells at the
facility by Environmental Investigations, Inc. of Durham, NC. The purpose of these
tests was determine the average hydraulic conductivity of the surficial aquifer and
underlying formations at the site. In addition, the results of these tests will assist in
determining the potential optimal location for possible ground water recovery at the
site.
The bail tests were conducted by withdrawing the one liter of water from the subject
well and measuring the draw down effect in elevation of the water table and duration in
time before stabilization of the water table was achieved.
The hydraulic conductivity of the aquifer in the area of influence was then calculated
using the Hvorslev method with the following formula:
R){RI day)
2(L)i%)
where:
K = Hydraulic Conductivity
r = Radius of Well in Feet
R = Radius of Borehole in Feet
L = Length of Screen or Saturate Thickness in Feet
^ = Time in Minutes
Page 6
Comprehensive Site Assessment
Holland BP Facility
October 30, 1992
Data from three of the wells located at various points at the facility yielded three values
of 0.32 Ft/day, 0. H Ft/day, and 0.08 Ft/day. These values may be averaged to yield
and average hydraulic conductivity at the site of 0.17 Feet per day.
The report of the bail tests and calculated results are presented in Appendix D.
7.0 EXTENT OF CONTAMINANT PRESENCE
Soil and ground water samples obtained from the soil borings and monitoring wells at
the site were submitted for analysis by certified environmental laboratories and used to
determine the extent of the contamination present at the facility. The results of these
findings are summarized in separate descriptions of the soil and the ground water
contaminant presence. Copies of all laboratory reports are included in Appendix E.
7.1 Soil Contamination
Soil samples used to determine the extent of soil contamination were collected at
regular intervals during the installation of the soil borings at the site. Additional soil
samples were collected from six hand auger borings were installed around the dispenser
islands and around the abandoned UST system. The samples were collected from the
unsaturated zone above the static water table for purposes of delineating soil
contamination in this area only.
All soil samples were collected, placed in plastic ziplock bags and labeled. After a
holding time of at least 15 minutes, the headspace of each sample bag was screened for
the presence of organic vapors using a Foxboro OVA 128 instrument. In order to
minimize potential cross contamination of the samples, latex gloves were worn during
the sample preparation. All sample collection equipment was cleaned between borings.
Selected soil samples exhibiting elevated levels of organic vapors were then placed in
precleaned glass jars, labeled and stored on ice until delivered to a laboratory for
analysis. A total of four soil samples were submitted for analysis using EPA Method
5030 for Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons in the gasoline range.
Results of laboratory analysis indicate elevated presence of petroleum constituents in
Sample HA-IA and Sample HA-2B. All other sample results were below detection
limits. Results of the field screenings and laboratory analysis for all soil samples are
presented in Table 3. A diagram showing the location of the soil sample collection
points and the estimated extent of the soil contamination at the site is presented in
Figure 8.
Page 7
Comprehensive Site Assessment
Holland BP Facility
October 30, 1992
The soil contamination at the site is generally limited to the area between the front
dispenser island and the UST stor^e area on the western side of the property. The
most probable source of the contamination remaining in place at the site is leakage
from beneath the dispenser island. Contaminated soil in the UST storage area was
excavated during the UST system closure and the area backfilled with clean sand. No
contamination was detected either during the field screening or in laboratory analysis of
samples collected in the area of the abandoned UST system.
7.2 Ground Water Contamination
Ground water samples were collected from all seven monitoring wells at the site on
September 24, 1992. Each well was measured for total depth and depth to ground
water prior to sampling. The surface of the static water table in each well was then
visually inspected for the presence of free product using a disposable bailer. No free
product was encountered in any well during the investigation.
Prior to sampling, each well was purged of an amount of water equal to three times the
volume of water standing in the well. All samples were collected and transferred
directly from the bailers to precleaned glass jars, labeled and placed on ice for storage.
On September 25, 1992 the samples were delivered to AnalytiKem, Inc. of Rock Hill,
SC for analysis. Chain of Custody procedures were used throughout the sampling
phase of the assessment.
Samples from each well were submitted for analysis using EPA Method 601 for
halogenated volatile hydrocarbons, EPA Method 602 for volatile aromatic
hydrocarbons including Methyl Tertiary-Butyl Ether (MTBE) and EPA Method 625 for
semivolatile aromatic hydrocarbons, A library search was conducted for the ten highest
ranging detection levels for the EPA 625 compounds. Results of all ground water
sample analyses were reported within 15 days of sample receipt.
Results of the laboratory analysis of the ground water samples indicate a presence of
compounds typically associated with petroleum compounds in all shallow monitoring
wells at the site. No presence of any contaminants were detected in the deep cased type
III monitoring well.
The presence of benzene was detected above NC Groundwater Standards (ref. NCAC
Title 15 A Subchapter 2L Section .0202 Water Quality Standards) in monitoring wells
MW-1 and MW-6. The additional presence of ethyl benzene, MTBE and Naphthalene
was detected above NC Groundwater Standards in monitoring well MW-6. A summary
of the results of ground water analysis is presented in Table 4.
Page 8
Comprehensive Site Assessment
Holland BP Facility
October 30, 1992
These compounds are among those most commonly associated with petroleum products
in the Class I fuel range such as gasoline. The presence of MTBE, a compound used
exclusively in the petroleum industry as a gasoline additive, confirms the released
product to be gasoline. The source of this release, based on the ground water sample
analysis results, is confirmed to be the area around the front dispenser island. This
conclusion is evidence by the presence of consistent petroleum compounds in the two
monitoring wells placed near potential source areas at the site.
The extent of the ground water contamination appears to be originating in the area
around the front dispenser island and extends north to northwest following ground
water migration pathways beneath the existing building. The presence of MTBE in
monitoring wells MW-5 and MW-3 indicates that the leading edge of the contaminant
presence has reached this point. A diagram showing the estimated extent of ground
water contamination is presented in Figure 9.
8.0 PRELIMINARY EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT
The release of petroleum products from the UST system formerly in use at the facility
has resulted in the presence of several potentially toxic compounds in the soil and
ground water at the site. Of these compounds, benzene is the most prevalent and is the
most potentially toxic compound.
The presence of benzene is limited to the portion of the property near and around the
release source. The presence of MTBE has been detected in all shallow monitoring
wells on the site. MTBE is generally more soluble than benzene, allowing for greater
migratory range when dissolved in ground water. For assessment purposes, it may be
considered that no other compounds present have or will migrate at a greater rate than
MTBE, allowing the presence of MTBE to determine to extent of the release. Using
this assumption, it may be concluded that very little of the contamination present in the
ground water at the site has migrated beyond the property boundaries.
The facility is located within the City Limits of Wilson, NC with no private or
domestic water supply wells located on or within 1500 feet of the property, thereby
allowing virtually no human exposure pathways of the ground water contamination.
The presence of soil contamination at the site provides two typical exposure pathways,
one being direct exposure to accessible soil, and the second being exposure to ground
water impacted by overlying contaminated soil. There is currently no exposed
contaminated soil at the site. As stated prior, no ground water exposure pathways
exist.
Page 9
Comprehensive Site Assessment
Holland BP Facility
October 30, 1992
9.0 PRELIMINARY REMEDIAL ALTERNATIVES
Due to the very limited source and affected areas of the release, a remedial action plan
may be prepared which allows for assurance of no off-site migration of the
contamination and restores the impacted areas.
It is recommended that this plan include provisions for the following:
• Excavation and disposal of the contaminated soil from around the source area;
• Recovery and treatment of contaminated ground water;
• Installation of a vapor recovery system to remove contaminated soil from the
vadose zone exposed as ground water is drawn to the recovery well.
These provisions are proposed with the following considerations:
The limited amount of contaminated soil may be easily accessed and removed. The
depth of excavation is limited to the existing depth of the static water table, which
averages approximately 6 to 8 feet. Any greater extent which is inaccessible will be
treated using the vapor recovery system.
The hydrogeologic conditions at the site allow for accessible recovery of the
contaminated ground water. A pump test conducted on one of the downgradient
monitoring wells will determine the optimum location and pumping rate for a series of
one or more recovery wells.
The soil structure at the site will facilitate a vacuum system which allows for removal
of contaminants exposed after the commencement of the ground water recovery and
assists with ground water restoration by removing volatile constituents from the shallow
water table. This vapor recovery system may also be used to restore any potential soil
contamination which may not be accessible to excavation.
Page 10
Comprehensive Site Assessment
Holland BP Facility
October 30, 1992
10.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
10.1 Conclusions of The Assessment
The soil and ground water at the site has been impacted by a release of petroleum
products from the Underground Storage Tank system formerly in use at the facility.
The apparent source of the release is in the area near and around the former dispenser
island located at the front of the facility.
The soil contamination appears to be limited to the area around the source. The ground
water contamination appears to originate in this source area and has migrated in a north
to northwest direction to the approximate property boundaries. The contaminant levels
are relatively low with no free product present in any of the monitoring wells at the
site.
There are currently no human exposure pathways to any of the contaminant
compounds. There is no risk of exposure to dangerous vapors or potential explosion
resulting from the presence of the release products.
The affected areas at the site may be restored by means of excavating the accessible
contaminated soil and recovering and treating the contaminated ground water. A vapor
recovery system should also be utilized to recover contaminants from inaccessible areas
of soil contamination and provide potential volatilization of ground water contaminants.
10.2 Recommendations for Further Action
In accordance with NC Division of Environmental Management regulations pertaining
to a release of contaminating products from an UST system, it is the recommendation
of Richmond Environmental Services, Inc. that the following actions be undertaken:
1. Preparation of a soil excavation and disposal work plan to facilitate soil removal
2. Conduction of a 24 hour pump test on one of the monitoring wells at the site to
determine the areal effect of ground water removal. The data obtained from this
test will be used to determine the optimal pumping rate and recovery well location.
3. Conduction of a vacuum recovery pilot test to determine maximum vacuum effect
and range. The data obtained from this test will be used to determine the optimal
vacumm rate and v^)or extraction points.
Page 11
Comprehensive Site Assessment
Holland BP Facility
October 30, 1992
The information obtained and prepared should the be combined into a complete
Corrective Action Plan (CAP) and submitted to NC Division of Environmental
Management for review and approval. Following the approval of the CAP, NC DEM
will require the plan to be implemented in accordance with a Special Order by Consent.
In addition, it is recommended that regular measurement of relative ground water
elevations begin, with data collected monthly and ground water samples be collected
and submitted for analysis on a quarterly basis. This action is based on the need to
monitor potential changes in ground water fluctuations and contaminant levels.
Page 12
i TARBOft
MhSf
ircoa
,sSf£Lll
HOLLAND BP FACILITV
Project No:
0WO2
wrecked By:
Drawn By:
Drawing No:
Scale:
: 60
DateiO/25/<^2
PROJECT TITLE:
^ite Uocdtion M^ip
HOLLAND DP FACILITY
ViUon, N^rth CaroUn^t
RICHMOND
ENVIRONMENTAL
SERVICES, INC.
Raleigh, North Carolina
U^T ^y->tCTi
\^occii\or\
ronner
U^T 'by^tcm
Locai\ox\
V\*>vtnher
A^^med
Piping
l-ocaXwn
Hi^hwiJy 3t?l
?c lOi)
Project Not
2cyk?C>2
Choekod 8yt
Drown 8y:
Drawing Not
Scalat
Datat
I : 60
\0/l&/<M
PROJSCT TITLBt
Facility Diagram
HOULANP DP FACILITY
Wilson, North Corolin^
RICHMOND
ENVIRONMENTAL
SERVICES, INC.
North Carolina
iiwon-Bynuin
Drrve-in •
Filtati
PIWiggins Mill
Reservoir
Waist on
^ Wiggins Mill
HOLLAND BP FACILITY
/ Golf Course
Project No:
o<^ooi
Drawing No:PROJECT TITLE:
73' T0p0|r«phic Miip
HOLLAND DP FACILITY
ViUon, N^rth C4roiin4i
RICHMOND
ENVIRONMENTAL
SERVICES. INC.-.lecked By Scale:
Drawn By:Raleigh. North CaroIlBa10/25/<12
Hi^hw^^y 5(9!
0 50 100
Project Not
20^002
Chockod Byt
Drawn By:
Drawing No:
Scalo:I :^0
Data:\o/iy/<M
PROJBCT TtTLB:
5oil ^or'in^ U^CAticn^
HOLLAND DP FACILITY
Wil*»on, North Cflrolinrt
RICHMOND
ENVIRONMENTAL
SERVICES, INC,
Raleigh, North Carolina
Relfitive
E\evat\on
-\00' A
^5'
<^0'
55'
50'
75'
A
5D-5
Z
z n C\ayt>i or ^ilty ^andf? ( > 75% 5>ar\i)
- "^ilty and ^anJiy Cby«> ( > 75% Cl^jy)
" Apprc?xinirtte 'ptiatic Winter J a\?\e
Project Not
)02
Choekod Pyt
Drawn Byt
Drawing Not
Scalat NT^
Datat
PROIBCT imst
Lith^l^^y Pid^ram
HPULANP Pr FACIUITY
Wibon, Narth Carolina
RICHMOND
ENVIRONMENTAL
SERVICES. INC.
Raleigh. North Carolina
® - lAonXonn^ Well L-ocat\on
Mt-4
M«>2
9C?\oo
Hi^hw^y 3(91
Project No:
io<K>oz
Chocked By:
Drawn By:
Drawing No:
Scale:I : C>0
Data
PROjeCT TtTLE:
Monitoring Well Locations
HOUUANP DP FACIUITY
Wibon, North Carolina
RICHMOND
ENVIRONMENTAL
SERVICES, INC.
Raleigh, North Carolina
® - Mc>nit£>rin^ Well Location
MW Elev(ati£?n^ and Contour
Uine^ are PbpUyed in Feet
MV-!»
d7XM
M<r-4®
<K.4fi
MV-4
<0,41
Hi^hw<ay 301
50 vo
Pro|«ct No:
Chockod tyi
Drawn Sy:
Drawing Not y
Scalat I : 40
Data:,^/2^/q2
PROJECT imet
6r&un<lvdter Elevation Contau^^
HOUUAND &P FACILITY
Wll^an, Narth Carolina
RICHMOND
ENVIRONMENTAL
SERVICES. INC.
Raleigh, North Carolina
Hand Au^er ^orin^ Location
^oi Donn^ Location
fi^findoned
U^T ®>y«>t«n
HA-4 U^<lti<?tiO-t my—*>—
HA-4HA-5.
Cont^mwrwtipn
Hl^hnay 3>0\
5(?JOt?
Project No:
ICX^OZ
Ch«ck«d 8yt
Drawn Py:
Drawing Not
6
Sealat I : ^0
PROJECT rrrLE:
Pelineati^n o\ ^o\\ C^ntominati^n
HOUUAND FACIUITY
Wit^an, Narth Caroiina
RICHMOND
ENVIRONMENTAL
SERVICES, INC.
Raleigh, North Carolina
® - MomXorm^ Well Location
MV-2
MTM •
>9<3pp^-
Hi^hwijy 3(91
50 100
Prol«ct Not
icwoi
Chockod Byt
Drawn By:
Drawing Not
\0
Scalat I : GO
Data
PROJECT TITLEt
Extant of
6roundvoter Contamination
HOULANP BP FACILITY
\)B'll«on, North Carolina
RICHMOND
ENVIRONMENTAL
SERVICES. INC»
Raleigh, North Carolina
HOLLAND BP FACILITY
Wilson, North Carolina
Table 1. Descriptive Summary of UST System
Tank Size Date Date Status Product
No.Installed Removed
1 2000 5/12/61 1/15/91 P Gasoline
2 2000 5/12/61 1/15/91 P Gasoline
3 2000 5/12/61 1/15/91 P Gasoline
4 550 5/12/61 1/15/91 P MotorOil
5 3000 5/12/61 5/1/81 P Gasoline
All Sizes Report in Gallons
HOLLAND BP FACILITY
Wilson, North Carolina
Table 2
Relative Groundwater Elevations
Monitoring Well ID
Well ID; MW-1
Top of Casing:
Depth to Water
Groundwater Elevation:
7/6/92
99.46
6.62
92.84
Date Measured
9/24/92 10/24/92
99.05
9.00
90.05
99.05
6.10
92.95
Weil ID: MW-2
Top of Casing:
Depth to Water
Groundwater Elevation:
Well ID: MW-3
Top of Casing:
Depth to Water
Groundwater Elevaticm:
98.24
5.45
92.79
95.60
5.36
90.24
98.08
4.76
93.32
95.40
4.77
90.63
98.08
4.81
93.27
95.40
4.98
90.42
Well ID: MW-4
Top of Casing:
Depth to Water
Groundwater Bevation:
100.24
7.35
92.89
100.15
6.75
93.40
100.15
6,74
93.41
Well ID: MW-5
Top of Casing:
Depth to Water
Groundwater Bevation:
93.66
6.21
87.45
93.02
6.00
87.02
93.02
5.98
87.04
Well ID: MW-6
Top of Casing:
Depdi to Water
Groundwater Elevation:
99.22
6.80
92.42
99.22
6.75
92.47
Well ID: DW-1
Top of Casing:
Depth to Water
Groundwater Bevation;
99.20
10.70
88.50
99.20
10.43
88.77
Page 1
HOLLAND BP FACILITY
Wilson, North Carolina
Table 3
OVA Resuhs of Field Screening of Soil Samples
Depth HA-1 HA-2 HA-3 HA-4 HA-6 HA-7
1
2
3 1000 1000 <2 <2 <2 <2
4
5
6 1000 1000 <2 <2 22 36
7
8
9 18 <2
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
All Readings Reported in Parts Per Million
Instrument: Foxboro OVA 128
Page 1
HOLLAND BP FACILITY
Wilson, North Carolina
Table 3
OVA Results of Field Screening of Soil Samples
Depth SB-1 SB'2 SB-3 SB-4
1
2
3 94 <2 1000 < 2
4
5 1000 <2
6
7 1000 <2
8 4 32
9
10
11
12
13 4
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
All Readings Reported In Parts Per Million
Instrument: Foxboro OVA 128
Page 2
HOLLAND ^AGILITY
Wilson, North Carolina
Table 4
Results of Laboratory Analysis
Groundwater Samples
9/24/92
Parameter
Benzene
Toluene
Ethylbenzene
Xylenes, Total
Total BTEX
MTBE
Naphthalene
MW-1
310.00
21.00
<10
39.00
370.00
190.00
MW-2 MW-3 MW-4
0.00
3.40
0.00 0.00
77.00 42.00
MW-5 MW-6
480.00
* 200.00
66.00
• 217.00
0.00 963.00
42.00 690.00
•• 12.00
DW-1 NC Standards
0.00
<2
1.00
1000.00
29.00
400.00
200.00
N/D
NOTE: Total BTEX is a Calculated Value, not a Measured Parameter
All Values Reported in Parts Per Billion (ug/L)
• = Below Detection Limits of 1.0 parts per billion (ug/L)
•• = Below Detection Limits of 10.0 parts per billion (ug/L)
N/D NC 2L Standard Established as No Detection
Page 1
APPENDIX A
Previous Site Reports
ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT
FOR
COMER OIL COMPANY
P.O. BOX 711
ROCKY MOUNT, N.C. 27802-0711
SITE LOCATION
HOLLAND'S GULF STATION
US HIGHWAY 301 AND GOLDSBORO ROAD
WILSON, N.C.
SUBMITTED BY
UTTS ENVIRONMENTAL
218 W. THIRD STREET
AYDEN, N.C. 28513
'V
APRIL, 1990
INTRODUCTION
At the request of hr. H,C- Shearin of Comer Oil Co., UTTS
Environmental was contracted to conduct an environmental site
assessment at Holland's Gulf Station in Wilson, N.C. The site
is located on the north side of the intersection of US Highway
301 and Goldsboro Road in Wilson, N.C.
Previously, UTTS, Inc. had conducted an Underground Storage Tank
(UST) abandonment investigation at the site. During this
investigation minor soil contamination was found within the UST
pit at one location. As a result of UTTS, Inc.'s findings, UTTS
Environmental was contracted by Comer Oil Co. to install three
monitoring wells to check for groundwater contamination.
UTTS Environmental conducted an initial site assessment only for
the Holland's Gulf site proper. No attempt was made to
characterize offsite conditions. The investigation included the
followi ng:
1) Characterize the shallow subsurface geologic conditions.
2) Characterize the lateral and vertical extent of
contaminants (free product and dissolved components).
3) Sample groundwater for Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TPH)
and Benzene, EthyIbenzene, Toluene, and total Xylenes
respectively.
4) Proposed recommendations for further work and/or Remedial
Action Plan.
SITE HISTORY
The referenced facility previously contained eight (8) UST's
containing gasoline, diesel, heating oil, and waste oil. UTTS,
Inc. was contracted to obtain soil samples from the tank beds
for proper UST abandonment. Abandonment is to be by exhumation
and in place foaming.
Soil samples were analyzed in-house by the Hanby Analytical
method for TPH, and with the exception of one (sample itl), all
showed clean or less than 5 ppm. One duplicate of sample
(*tlA) was sent to Environment 1, Inc. of Greenville N.C. for
analysis of BETX.
The Hanby analysis showed 100 ppm TPH. The analysis for BETX
(Benzene, Ethylbenzene, Toluene, and Xylenes) indicates <1299
ug/1 for all of these parameters (<5196 ug/kg total BETX).
These numbers are misleading because the results are reported on
a wt/wt basis. Within the formula for obtaining the final
numbers, there are various correction factors (i.e. % water,
etc.). This, coupled with the fact that such a small amount of
material is used in the analysis (1-2 g), to make up the
reportable amounts (reported in kg) this total amount is grossly
inflated, roughly by 1,000 times. All individual parameters are
in actuality equivalent to <1 ug/1 as reported for liquids,
resulting in the same number in each column. Therefore, there
was no BETX detected in the sample. -
Since no BETX was detected in Environment 1's analysis, it may
be assumed that the 100 ppm detected in the Hanby method is
composed of heavier, unidentified hydrocarbons.
Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether (MTBE) was present in the sample
sent to Environment 1, Inc. (832,000 ug/kg). This with the
correction factors equates to 208 ug/1 as reported for liquids.
The presence of MTBE and the absence of BETX is unknown at this
t ime .
Comer Oil Co. then contracted UTTS Environmental to conduct a
groundwater assessment at the site. UTTS Environmental installed
three monitoring wells to check for contamination outside the
UST pit. This report discusses these findings.
FACILITY DESCRIPTION
The referenced tract of land is located at the intersection of
US Highway 301 and Goldsboro Road in the city of Wilson, N.C.
The property is bordered on the east by a Goodyear tire center .
City water and sewer are supplied in the area. Topographically
the area drops rapidly from front to back, approximately 10
feet. The included site location map shows the location of the
site in relationship to the Wilson area. The included site plan
shows the property boundary, location of buildings, and
monitoring well locations.
'v "~ V\ • ."^••' ■.;^Vl'''..>?^\y*, Trailer *'> •
i :i •\ 4<.^ -y \ ' '=:^ -i /\ •• - ;i' :i ' -j^'x A • if y ■■\/^'^ /'Armo^rL ,;' A 'X 'Eastern NC. ''vT ' V i
•1 '-Af-X'•••••\<^\ •• .A\ • \. ^.*- .V ' /;■ Center , \ ,V-,-^ // I i
' ^aoTO-i: I
?/ .Hieh S<4i I
/ Afi«ms,
Libranv
Mi - « • ^1\ ri,.rne» jV-.;.v" "v ^ / \ I . . =Elf!e Si'i •'"»C'v...- -'■' - \. •-' Sch J ; 7^Winscead
rorbesV -^137 .;^.t
Rest Haven
Gem
Towers
;/ ,'^ bevraii-i'• Osposa
1
y\\
-lA. \
■\
tiester
W-" \
~ CountySpeedwajrr
/
/\1iA, ,
/AvXa^ ''
s.
UsZe NVlflONMENIAL
2 IB W. Third Slreol
AYDEN. north CAROLINA 28513
919-355-5138 919-746-2046
SITE LOCATION MAP
WILSON, NC uses 7.5' QUADRANGLE
;.ontentnea"r^"'•Junction '
\ -CONTOUR INTERVAL = 10
V
SITE ASSESSMENT FOR UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK
ABANDONMENT (in place) For:
Comer Oil Co, Rocky Mount At
Holland Gulf Station,
Hwy. 301 & 301A, Wilson, N.C.
Job # 118-33-89003
HOLE #8-0
E<-■^W
HOLE #5 - ©
H0LE#6 -©©-HOLE #7
N
SERVICE
STATION
"i
## ul
I-
H0LE#1 -©
HOLE #3 -©
TANK 4^12000 QAU
GASOLINE
2000 GAL.
OPERATIONAL
1000 GAL.
OPERATIONAL
TANK #2 3000 GAL.
DIESEL
©-HOLE #2
©-HOLE #4
KEY
© » Sample Location
LOT AREA:
254* Depth; 260* Width
1 mm = 1 ft.
* Footage is not to
scale unless specified.
NOTES:All Holes are Approx.
3' From End of Tank
10' Depth
6" into Water Table
REGIONAL GEOLOGY AND HYDROGEOLOGY
Wilson is situated in the eastern Coastal Plain Physiographic
Province of North Carolina in central Wilson County.
The Coastal Plain Province is composed of exposed non-marine to
marine sediments and sedimentary rocks of Cretaceous to
Quaternary age. In Wilson County these include from youngest to
oldest: Quaternary surficial deposits; Pliocene Yorktown
Formation; and Cretaceous Cape Fear Formation.
The Cretaceous Cape Fear Formation is less than 20 ft thick at
Wilson, if it is present at all and dips to the E-SE at 5
ft/mi. This unit represents continental (fluvial) gravels,
sands, silts, and clays formed at the landward edge of a major
delta complex prograding eastward from the crystalline rocks of
the Piedmont. This is not a major aquifer in the Wilson area
but it becomes important in eastern Wilson Co.
The Pliocene Yorktown Formation typically consists of massive,
blue to gray marine clay and sandy clay, marl, sandy gravel, and
clayey sand. This unit ranges from 0 to 30 feet thick in the
area and dips to the east at 4 ft/mi. The high clay content
makes this unit a poor aquifer in the area, but it does act as a
confining bed and a recharge source (leakage) for the underlying
Cretaceous Cape Fear Fm.
The Pleistocene terrace deposits consist of silt and silty sands
characteristic of sheetwash and braided stream deposits. These
deposits are thickest in the interfluve areas and are typically
20-30 ft thick in the Wilson area. These may lie directly on
saprolite (weathered rock material) or older sedimentary units.
The terrace deposits make up the bulk of the domestic wells in
Wilson County but as these are surficial deposits they are also
subject to contamination due to septic systems and agricultural
activities .
• I
HOaTH CAROLINA OSPARTMiNT Or NATURAL c;;iSO'J=C;S *N0 r
DIVISION OF £NVIftOS!.'.=MTAL MANAGCI.'-CNT - Or. X"0\VA i L.-t Ci^i.
P.O. 80X 27687 -RAL£1CH.N.C. 27011. PHONS (9 19)723-32 2 1
WELL CONSTRUCTION' RECORD
Cyad. No.
Lai
FOR OFFICE USE only
Serial No.
Long.Pc
Mi.oor Basin .
Basin Code .
Header £nl..G\V-1 -cnt.
DRILLING CONTRACTOR // TT^
DRILLER REGISTRATION NUM3ER /J.1Q_
STATE WELL CONSTRUCTION
PERMIT NUMBER: ^ k//??
1. WcLL LOCATION: (Show sketch o! the locaiion bslovr)
fJaaresl Town: _ u yilso/s/Cc.'iiy:
(Road, communiiy. or SL'idivisio.*. and Lol No.)
7. ov/mcR jA.O..S})pnB{r/ A) Cq-')
aoorcSs P-0- 7/j —. .(STsei Of F.O'jts '^o.J _ _/?.ryy/rk,.}4 . nc _^7ros.
c/-,- c: Town Sistsuiiyo.-'.own
Dsoih
•fC.T.
drilling log
Formc'ion Osscrioiio.n
-.^0'
4S^f^j4LT
3. O.ATS ORIULEO uSc 0.= WH.'.
<. total DEFT,-: CJTTilJGS COLLECTED 'JVs; ^i-lo
E. DOES V/HLL REPLACE ELiST:;.^ v/ELL? D
5. ETATiC water LEVEL. _S 5 Liv!.:
TOP OF CASING 1^ __lQ FT. AEO'- E LAND
7. ^lELO (QPfTi): y.ETHOD O-- TEST
TSR ZONES (Ccpih}: m —
-V'
-h "8'
fZ(X.lC
-e'4 'id
'10' 4 -/V'
nfii
77%"z. c;-;lorimaticn:
•:C. C.-.SING:
Am:.*:
rfcri
.=fC7n
_Q ^ F:.—J
DicfTieisr ** L'sijfic!
" r &L
Ffcr. .
I ••. a.ROUT:
From
Fforri .
■lE. SCREEN;
From
Ffom
Ffom.
a:::.one.] soscs is nsesed --S: back o: lcr-~
LOCATION SKETCH ^ /
;■ and cuiancs {rom a: ^aasi iv;o Sia'.i
•siergncs poinjs'
<0
Dapin :.5=;ccc ^JZ FI. CBf^e^-r yp^ur-etf ^
IC.-3 .-I herJ^'^'ic
Oepin Oiameier Siol S'Zs Mciarial-3 ToWlF.._^a^-.^
Pi.;.n. _
i-3..
in.
in.
\0^
<LCU)wCU.<fS=> 4,
13 GRAVEL PACK;
From
From
Oep:.'. Sits Maiariei, -3' TO -/-/ n. S lAc\^ </VL)301
Fl.
11. REMARKS;
no HEREBY CEBTlf v Tn/.T THIS Y-'Sa W.TS CClTjn^CTED IN ACCpOAKCE_ WITH .5 NCAC 2C. WELL CONSTRUCTIONJTANOA.ROS. and that a CORY OF THIS aSCO-AO/J^Jen 1!^ T/r 2 - J( .UI5.-UP ^ r^T .:ZjU
«- r-.. "rn/. i-Ti-ig r*n ir.t'isT GATF
MOHIM UAKUUrtA us^'AfMMci.. — "" •
OIVISiOM Or EHViaO.'IMcNTA- t.WNA3E>.';.ST - ;=C'-"<OV/ATt.n Sc^.lCH
P.O. BOX 27E57 -fiAL=;GH.H.O. ZTdX',. PH3N= C9 1 S)7:3-3:: 1
V/ELL CONSTRUCTION HECOr.D
uhilling contractor .
mf)O.RILLER REGISTRATION NUMBER zZ.—LLJ-U,
C-jsi. No.
Lo:
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
Serial f;©.
Long.
'•'.inor Basin .
Sacin Code .
Header 6ni.,
— Pc
GV/-1 Enj.
STATE V/ELL CONSTRU.GTION
PERMIT NUMBER: ^?- 05.00' ijJJ7'} 'nOi
1. WELL LOCATION: (Shov sLeicn of the location oslovr)
Naaresl To^vn: _
Cc.-n:y:
Oaoin
Ffcrr.
t A/)/
{Road. Comrnuniiy. or Secoivlsic.*. and Lot N'o.)
2 ov/NER // P. ^Shtn/ZiW f O// /^,) ^
n .OORESS A ^C • A A a a* r'Street or Roo:^'<c.)in/i /)^ . /)C <^1^0 -2.
'' State CoAa -W '8'C'-'- 0 "ovTi ' Stats ^'3 '-5A® - ' -«—
3. DATE OHILLED USE OF V/E.L '/o'^<. total DEFT.-: cuttings COLLECTEC J Vss ^ No LJfL.
i. DOES WELL REPLACE =>:tST::;C V/ELL? □ v;; % N:
5. ST.-.TIC WATE.R LEVEL: FT. g, 0.* C - =:NG.- « , 2a. r - - 'ZZ • ^ ZTOP OF CASiNG IS 'J F I. -•
7, ^'lELO (gpm): ".'.EThOO OF ne
drilling log
Formation Dsscriot'on
—6>^d^ CIa^/ (^
<ArJQ
rIAd,Of.r/SE aAi
fJ!v.LATER ZONES (ca^tr.}: {A
.HLORINATION: Tv?;
• 0. C.aSING;
Amo."-
Diamsier .'.■.stSfia''k-
From
G.FOUT:
(0
Da:;.*.
Tr ~C?F! rr^rrT-h 0(lM2Ui
Tn PI u
SCREEN:
Dedtn
Tn -/?
Oiameiar Slot S^i
PI J2 in. aQ^O
; Wilsftal
r 1 :n in
?: !.n in
GRAVEL Pr\CK;
From
From
pai/aRKS;
Deoir. .TO-//Siz;
Pi 0 //^^A
l.'.2!8fiai
<ArJjQ
Ft.
!; sciit.cnal sosca is nsscac •-s: bact: oi Icr.~..
LOCATION SKE"Cr;^
(S:*:.v crr's:;.;". and cistancs irom a; laasi tv.-o Stata Roa:-
Of ::nsr ■ai'sfsr.ce ooints/
^tfe/2- -h
I 00 HSP.ESY CHSTIFV THAT THIS '.VSIL WAS C0/3>lG:TE0 IN' ACJOaOA^E wire ,5 «CaC 2C. WSLL C0i-.'STRU.:Ti0.iI UU n....co. V.W _ ^ !:=rn=CA'/K EE'^N/.RCviCj^ TO TH= sv£lL OWNER. ^sT.ANOAnos. A,voTh... ..co.YOr ...s . f ■ (ItT^T.Jt^c. 2z^Zdz3l
SIGNATU.RE 0.= contractor OR AGENT OaTE
r-.^^u ^1 •. «! Cn- •«-.'.'.v.-<nt»meni -ir-.-j cf"-.' m w*" 0^""'
KOaTH CAROLINA 0£PAflTM£!.f OC ha «mu
DIVISION Or EMViaC!i!-':NrAL l.'A.'.'ACc'.'cN' - C.-.C-J.'JC.VA.£?. S:^.:CN
P.O. SOX 27637 -aALSic:-:.;;.:. :7 3u.ph:n= (9:9)723-2:27
V/ELL CON'STRUCTiCN' RECORD
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
Quad. No..
Lai
Serial No.
Long.
N.inor Basin ,
Basin Code .
Header Enl..
Pc
GW-1 sni..
drilling GONTRACTOF!u ttt.
DRILLER REGISTRATION f<IUMBER mo
STATE WELL CONSTRUCTION
PERMIT NUMBER; <7l - - nr)(^ O
1. WELL LOCATION: CShov/ sketch o( the location dslov/)
Nearest Tov.'n: (^SO^-Cc.niy:U^HSOhJ
Uoj y '^o! 4 'Rar A Depth
(Road, Community, or Scsoivisic.n and Lot No.j x -v p,,
2. OWNER ^ *
address P.O. Aok. 7//
ORILLING LOG
Formaiion Oescrioiio.n
'Lifeei or Routs yip.) ^ ~D!^ -h -Vi^c£/ ^OUrT-h ti(L 0~ JCity Tov.'n SiatT 00 C^ss IlJL-State Z'O C^da ^ —!
3. O.AIE DRILLED 0 USE 0-=^ WE.L ^—t.—
grassy '7^p<,oi'J_
OlM-y
aM~
cuttings CO<. total DErTr:
i. DOES Vv'ELL RErLACE EXiSTti-.'G '.vELL? D Vij ^
5. STATiC '•VA7=a i ~ — FT. U a:;-'i iC.-O.- ,,-;.NG.
LLECTEQ jYas ^ No "/V
TOP 0? CASING IS
7. ^•tsLO (QPi.^):
0 FT. aIov7 LANO i..=FACE.
method of test
' 'V.i.TER ZONES [oapsh}: ,
5. CHLOPINATION- Typi
•:0. CASING:
nL ArnC'.*:
rfcm .
From
Ffo.m
1 :•. a.ROUT:
From
From
12. SCREEN;
From
From
From,
Diameter •■.■-tana'
.Ft..
!i a;; '..cnal soace is needed bac": 01 !c.-m.
LOCATION s:-:f~c.:-:
(S:*:.'.' cire::.;-' and distance irom a; teas; f.vo State Foa:?.
Of •eferencs points?
'/n. -iv Sl<e-kd
0 .'/cte-iei_0 7n "J Ft. pou/tsn
Tn "3 Fl./^g-^T^r^/fe, *•
DeprnUc,j;'l Diameter Slot Size Material Uiamsier V»>v> v..-2' -..-13 p, ...M-in.
'C.
To.
Fi.
Ft.
;.n.
i.n.
in.
in.
Ij. GRAVEL PACK:
From
From,
REMARKS:
. OeOi.'. Sit"- Mai»:i«l3 To-// FI. 8 ,rrc/f 6A^0
Ft.
I DO HE.RESY CERTIFY THAT THIS WELL 'NAS CCNSTRUCTcO IN aCCCRQanCS WI^ »5 NCaC 2C. \Y£LL COK'STRUC'ICNSTanOa.FOS and that a copy of T:-:iS .RECORD HaS 3c£N PROviO^^O THE wC^y^WNER.nir.r iX<L-C/oA^—a
i:C'--T'J.RE CF GONTRACTOF; OR aGENT DATE
SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATION AND SITE HYDROGEOLOGY
The site geology was determined by installing three (3)
monitoring wells around the UST pit. In the area there was 3"
of topsoil or asphalt followed by 0.5 ft of crushed rock. Below
this there was 3.5 ft of red, sandy clay; 4 ft of sand; 2 ft of
soft clay; and 4 ft of stiff clay.
After monitoring well completion, purging, and groundwater
sampling, the water level in the borehole was allowed to
equilibrate. The tops of the wells were surveyed to obtain
spatial distribution and elevation above Mean Sea Level (MSL)
for the top of well casing. An assumed benchmark of 135.0 ft.
MSL was chosen from the Wilson, N.C. USGS 7.5' topographic
quadrangle map. Static water levels were measured from top of
well casing with a tape and leaded "plopper". Monitoring wells
(MU-1, MW-2, and MW-3) were used to obtain groundwater flow
direction and hydraulic gradient (dh/dl).
Groundwater flow is W-NW, toward the rear of the lot and toward
Goldsboro Road. The calculated hydraulic gradient (dh/dl) is
2.98 ft/49.50 ft or 0.06 ft/ft.
Features that may affect local groundwater flow patterns is the
backfilled UST pit and underground utility trenches. Depending
on the backfill material in the utility trenches, these may
impede or enhance flow, act as a conduit, and/or change flow
direction.
SAMPLING AND DECONTAMINATION
After purging the wells of three well volumes with a bailer,
groundwater samples were obtained with a Teflon bailer.
Groundwater samples were placed in 40 ml clear borosilicate
vials with a Teflon coated septum and each sample labeled and
placed in separately labeled zip lock plastic bags. These were
kept on ice until delivery to the laboratory.
Bailers were decontaminated in the field by the following
method:
1) Tap water rinse.
2) Wash with tap water and non-phosphate detergent.
3) Tap water rinse.
4) Distilled water rinse.
5) Pesticide Grade Methanol rinse.
6 ) Air dry.
Drilling equipment was decontaminated using a portable steam
generator and a methanol rinse before advancing to the next
drilling site.
DISSOLVED COMPONENT CHARACTERIZATION
Water samples were obtained from the the three monitoring
wells. These were sent to Southern Testing and Research
Laboratories in Wilson, N.C. for analysis of Benzene,
Ethylbenzene, Toluene, total Xylenes, and for Total Petroleum
Hydrocarbons (TPH). The results for the analyses are presented
in table form below.
PARAMETER MW-l MW-2 MW-3 NC STD
Benzene <1 <1 <1 1 ug/1
Ethylbenzene <1 <1 <1 29 ug/1
Toluene <1 <1 <1 1,000 ug/1
Xylenes <3 <3 <3 400 ug/1
TPH <30 <30 <30 ug/1
NC STD. = Title 15, Subchapter 2L, Classification And Water
Quality Standards Applicable To The Groundwaters Of North
Carolina .
From these data, the groundwater does not appear to have been
impacted as a result of an unauthorized'discharge of petroleum
products .
Sf.-I.l I !••!-. :'f' ['T .'.rK"-' : ("ARt.H 1. ARORh T'i!:? I . INC.
I--' rA>> - r,A7 park AveKM.nr - wil^son, nc 2789';
PHONE < 919 ) 2'3"-' 417S
ptfiA-jpr or ANAL/::.!-:.
<N
:G
•C'
,NPl.
.RKf:
.pll-'L'- N'J .( 'v '' • - ?
rr-u-iM gray
I !TTS :.-.MVIRONri£NTAL
L'^ wrcr THIPO -^TREOT
. Nr
WATER F0in8885l
A- i-1W-l
Jt
rr T' -
roL
V
' : MW-":
E ■'EST WO
.1'-i. . I
.PEffL
. LREN^E^'e
UENE
•" f-iEE
1 rpw
, i"
( ii:0^ L }
(mg/L )
( mg/L )
(mg/L )
(mg/L )
DATE or RCPORT: 90.04/09
i.:-ATE RECLIVL-D : 90/03/1,2
ACCOUNT NO,: 932;'8
rrLEPHONL :
I tOLLANDS F^ULF tt 07 - lOOS-OOOl
B: MUi-2
0 :
A: 3i4Ml S' 33 4f12 C : L
( .001
< .001
< ■-001
< .003
< .030
'! .001
< . 001
< .001
< .003
< .030
: .001
1 .001
< .001
< .003
< .030
91L :.Ts: ■"/■
: N PC'AH- N
f-ULL..:
: ' D ••
iewed .^nd Oippimv .""J
i'Tame • 'jh©rnas A. •'©.an, Jr., Ph.9.
Tit. l-e: M.^nag.*-vr . Fnv i r ©nmenta I Dept
'OUaLIiT F-CilVf.CE .YT A FAIR Fl'dC-""
RECOMMENDATIONS
Based on the findings of
appears to have been no
site. The location wher
the location of the UST
foam. This is due to cl
in-use UST's. In-place
that may have been assoc
therefore suggests that
the three monitoring
contravention of grou
e UTTS Inc. found soi
to be abandoned in pi
ose proximity to the
foaming will prevent
iated with this UST.
no further action be
wells, there
ndwater at the
1 contamination is
ace and filled with
building and the
any future problems
UTTS Environmental
taken at this site.
0 --CtS——
LIMITATIONS
The purpose of this investigation was to assess the existing and
potential environmental concerns and liabilities associated with
the subject site. The conclusions presented in this report are
based only on the observations made during the dates of the site
visits and should not be relied upon to represent site
conditions on other dates. The report presents a description of
the subsurface conditions observed at each boring location
conducted during this investigation. Subsurface conditions may
vary significantly with time, particularly with respect to
groundwater flow, elevations, and quality.
Should any additional data become available, these data should
be reviewed by UTTS Environmental and the findings presented
herein modified, as appropriate.
Mangum Oil
spih Hes'-'i-'rce^ . UnLO'*" ^ I
P.O. Box 7177 . Wilson, NC 27095
[phone] Nat'!. Wats: 800-543-2314 o ^
February 5, 1991 rtb" 1^31
n: • • < • , i
North Carolina Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Environmental Management
Raleigh Regional Office
3800 Barrett Drive
Raleigh, N.C. 27609
Dear Sir:
The attached closure report is submitted for Holland's BP (Comer
Oil Company), Highway 301 and Goldsboro Street, Wilson NC.
a. The base map includes a detailed description of the un
derground storage tank excavation area.
b. Tank #1 was 64" in diameter; 18' in length; had a capac
ity of 3,000 gallons; and the last product stored is unknown.
Tank #2 was 48" in diameter; 12' in length; had a capacity of
1,000 gallons; and the last product stored is unknown. Tank #3
was 64" in diameter; 12' in length; had a capacity of 2,000 gal
lons; and the last product stored is unknown. Tank #4 was 64" in
diameter; 12' in length; had a capacity of 2,000 gallons; and the
last product stored is unknown. Tank #5 was 48" in diameter; 12'
in length; had a capacity of 1,000 gallons; and the last product
stored is unknown.
c. Samples for these tanks were collected at a depth of 9'
for tanks #2 and #5 and 11' for tanks #1, #3, and #4.. All sam
ples were taken from the floor of the excavation area. Sample lO'
cations are clearly indicated on the base map.
d. All samples were collected by backhoe. They were put in
sample bottles and stored on ice in a cooler for transport to
Southern Testing and Research Laboratories in Wilson, N.C. Be
tween taking samples, all sampling tools were washed and covered
with rubber.
e. The original of the laboratory results and a copy of the
chain-of-custody receipts are attached. A reference to the sam
pling points is clearly indicated on the base map.
f. A separate sample was taken for the Site Sensitivity
Evaluation. The location of the sample is clearly marked on the
base map. The original of this laboratory result is attached.
Direct any questions to the undersigned at 919-237-4256 or 1-800-
543-2314.
Sincerely,
)nd W. Grimes
President
Mangum Oil Spill Resources, Inc.
TANK DATA
(MUST CORRESPOND TO BASE MAP)
JOB NAME & LOCATION: A/oUjQAJD 'S E'P
UuJ-/<; 30! ^ 3r)/^
SIZE/AGE
DIAMETER/LENGTH
PRODUCT
BOTTOM OF
TANK TO
GRADE COVER
# SAMPLES
TAKEN
LOCATION OF
SAMPLES
tank
/ooolnuie
TANK #2 TANK #3 TANK #4
HOW
GATHERED
BACK FILL
MATERIAL
GRADE TO 6".
6" TO 3 *
3' TO TANK
BOTTOM
SAMPLE/SOIL
DEPTH TO
WATER TABLE
WAS WATER
IN TANK
WAS PETROLEUM
ODOR IN HOLE
OR SAMPLE
TANK #1
SOIL DATA
TANK #2
SOIL DATA
TANK #3
SOIL DATA
TANK #4
SOIL DATAJ
111
tZo
jes
/-/vcjLs / ur- xi
TANK DATA
(MUST CORRESPOND TO BASE MAP)
JOB NAME & LOCATION: /^oa./7AJD'6 BP
SIZE/AGE
DIAMETER/LENGTH
PRODUCT
BOTTOM OF
TANK TO
GRADE COVER
# SAMPLES
TAKEN
LOCATION OF
SAMPLES
30! ^so/n
/iJ/LSOkJ ^JC
TANK #1
30oo}ll^J^:^
VUK
TANK #2
/OOO/UUK
"is ''//S
7
TANK #3
////i
TANK #4
-SDOD/mK
U/JK
7
HOW
GATHERED
BACK FILL
MATERIAL
GRADE TO 6"
6" TO 3'
B/?o<7/7oS
SB/ud ^BAJb SfiAJb
TANK #1
SOIL DATA
TANK #2
SOIL DATA
TANK #3
SOIL DATA
TANK #4
SOIL DATA
3' TO TANK
BOTTOM
SAMPLE/SOIL
DEPTH TO
WATER TABLE
WAS WATER
IN TANK
WAS PETROLEUM
ODOR IN HOLE
OR SAMPLE
///
/////H'
aJo /Jo hico
yfes Jqs Jes
SHACKLEFORD TANK DISPOSAL
SHACKLEFORD LANDFARMING OF CONTAMINATED DIRT
Route 2, Box 61
Farmville, NC 27828
[phone]
OWNER James Shackleford
Hauler Jimmy Shackleford
Date
Purchase Order Number
Job Site
Who Requested Job
Billing Address
Mileage from Office
Number of Tanks Loaded
/..
150 Gallon Tank
o "7 rj Gallon Tank
Gallon Tank
1000 Gallon Tank
y '-• /..r
J y
' ' r
n n
t
' n ..j /--■ '
/ - /')'!■ r
/
2000 Gallon Tank 6000 Gallon Tank
3000 Gallon Tank 8000 Gallon Tank
4000 Gallon Tank 10000 Gallon Tank
5000 Gallon Tank 12000 Gallon Tank
When the tanks are loaded on Shackleford's trucks and tied down they
become Shackleford's liability. That releases the owner of the tanksand also the company that is pulling the tanks from all liabilities.
Tank Hauler —r-— —j'.y.'.-'-
Tank Puller
Terms seven days from receipt of invoice
oui
4 ->
4\
M
CO
OiX
T X O
ro O
BOIL DIM6
CothEZ OlLL!OMPfl/jy
CHo LLftUD'S Bp)
H<jj|ys 301 ^36m
tJlLsoM j M. C.
a
X' SflmpLfiS
(=LOOf^ OF THE"
RlZ£^
^ -- THIS SRi^pLe useo
Foe THe- -Sire"
5eo5iri\/iTy
EVflUJ PTioU.
' •- Di=-P7TlS ftTu)M(cH
SPfY)pL^5 COS"^^
T?lk^
SOUTHERN TESTING AND RESEARCH LABORATORIES. INC.
3709 AIRPORT DRIVE - WILSON, NC 77893
PHONE [phone]
REPORT OF ANALYSIS
lAB SAMPLE NO.(s): 192V1-4
RECEIVED FROM
NAM
ORG
ADD
CSZ
RAY GRIMES
MANGUM OIL SPILL RES.
P.O. BOX 7177
WILSON, NC 27893
SAMPLE(s) of: SOIL
MARKED A: #1 EAST
DATE OF REPORT: 91/01/29
DATE RECEIVED : 91/01/18
ACCOUNT NO.: 46915
TELEPHONE : [phone]
JOB NO. 0002
for Total Petrolevm Hydrocarbon (TPH) analysis
B: ♦tl WEST
C: #2 EAST D: #2 MIDDLE
SAMPLE/TEST
ANALYSIS
NO. > A: 192V1 B: 192V2 C: 192V3 D: 192V4
1. . TPH w/ BTEX distinction (Water—EPA602 P^T/GC/PID/HECD)(Soil —SW846-5030/8020 P&T/GC/PID/HECD )
Total TPH as Gasoline (ppm)
Benzene ( PPm)
Chlorobenzene (Ppm)
1.2-Dichlorobenzene ( ppm )
1.3-Dichlorobenzene ( ppm)
1 ,4-Dichlorobenzene ( ppm)
Ethylbenzene ( PPm)
Toluene ( PPfn )
+ Xylenes ( PPm)
+ MTBE (ppm)
+ EDB ( ppm)
2. TPH w/o BTEX distinction (Water—SW846-3510/8015 Micro Liq-Liq Ext/HRGC/FID)(Soil —SW846-3550/8015 Micro Sonic Ext/HRGC/FID )
Low-to-Medium Boiling (ppm): 130 : <2 : <2 : <2
(gasoline, kerosene,
jet fuel, etc.)
Higher Boiling
(diesel, fuel oil,
*motor oil, etc.)
*motor oil det. limit =
COMMENTS: A: GASOLINE 130 ppm
: B: MOTOR OIL 54 ppm
(ppm): <2 : 54 <2 : <2
15 ppm
LAB USE ONLY
A^"^LYSTs: DM
:UP: N RUSH: N
.^mE: MILES:
T: D:
I:
VI1/90
Rev
Name: Thomas A. Dean, Jr., Ph.D.
Title: Manager, Environmental Department
QUALITY SERVICE AT A FAIR PRICE"
SOUTHERN TESTTNG AND RESEARCH LABORATORIES, INC
3709 AIRPORT DRIVE ~ WILSON, NC 27B93
PHONE [phone]
REPORT OE ANALYSIS
I.AB SAMPLE NO.(s): 192V5-8
RECEIVED EROM
NAM
ORG
ADD
CSZ
RAY GRIMES
MANGUM OIL SPILL RES
P.O. BOX 7177
WILSON, NC 27893
SAMPLE(s) of: SOIL
MARKED A: #2 WEST
C: #3 MIDDLE
DATE OP REPORT: 91/01/29
DATE RECEIVED : 91/01/18
ACCOUNT NO.: 46915
TELEPHONE : [phone]
JOB NO. 0002
for Total Petroleum Hydrocarbon (TPH) analysis
B: #3 EAST
D: #3 WEST
SAMPLE/TEST
ANALYSIS
NO. > A: 192V5 B: 192V6 C: 192V7 D: 192V8
1. TPH w/ BTEX distinction (Water—EPA602 P«cT/GC/PID/HECD)
(Soil —SW846-5030/8020 PS:T/GC/PID/HECD )
Total TPH as Gasoline (ppm)
Benzene (PPm)
Chlorobenzene ( ppm)
1 ,2-Dichlorobenzene ( ppm)
1,3-Dichlorobenzene (ppm )
1 ,4-Dichlorobenzene ( ppm)
Ethyibenzene ( ppm)
Toluene (ppm)
+ Xylenes (ppm)
+ MTBE ( ppm)
+ EDB ( ppm)
2. TPH w/o BTEX distinction (Water—SW846-3510/8015 Micro Liq-Liq Ext/HRGC/FID)
(Soil —SW846-3550/8015 Micro Sonic Ext/HRGC/FID)
Low-to-Mediu.m Boiling (ppm): <2
(gasoline, kerosene,
jet fuel, etc.)
<2 <2 <2
Higher Boiling (ppm): <2
(diesel, fuel oil,
*motor oil, etc.)
*motor oil det. limit = : 15 ppm
COMMENTS:
<2 <2 <2
LAB USE ONLY
analysts: dm
F :UP: N RUSH: N
: MILES:
I : D;
I:
vll/90
Revie
Name: Thomas A. Dean, Jr., Ph.D.
Title: Manager, Environmental Department
"QUALITY SERVICE AT A FAIR PRICE
SOUTHERN TESTING AND RESEARCH LABORATORIES, INC
3709 AIRPORT DRIVE - WILSON, NC 37893
PHONE [phone],75
REPORT OF ANALYSIS
I AP SAMPLE NO.(s): 192V9-12
RECEIVED FROM
NAM
ORG
ADD
CSZ
RAY GRIMES
MANGUM OIL SPILL RES
P.O. BOX 7177
WILSON, NC 27893
SAMPLE(s) of: SOIL
MARKED A: EAST
C: #4 WEST
DATE OF REPORT: 91/01/29
DATE RECEIVED : 91/01/18
ACCOUNT NO.: 46915
TELEPHONE : [phone]
JOB NO. 0002
for Total Petroleum Hydrocarbon (TPH) analysis
B: #4 MIDDLE
D: #5 EAST
SAMPLE/TEST
ANALYSIS.
NO. > A: 192V9 B: 192V10 C: 192V11 D: 192V12
1 . TPH w/ BTEX distinction (Water—EPA602 P&T/GC/PID/HECD )
(Soil —SW846-5030/8020 PS^T/GC/PID/HECD )
Total TPH as Gasoline (ppm)
Benzene (PPm)
Chlorobenzene ( ppm)
1 ,2-Dichlorobenzene (ppm)
1 ,3-Dichlorobenzene ( ppm)
1 ,4-Dichlorobenzene ( PPm)
Ethylbenzene (ppm)
Toluene (ppm)
+ Xylenes ( PPm)
+ MTBE (ppm)
+ EDB ( ppm)
2. TPH w/o BTEX distinction (Water—SW846-3510/8015 Micro Liq-Liq Ext/HRGC/FID)
(Soil —SW846-3550/8015 Micro Sonic Ext/HRGC/FID)
Low-to-Medium Boiling (ppm)
(gasoline, kerosene ,
jet fuel, etc. )
33 14 50 <2
Higher Boiling (ppm): <2 <2 <2 <2
(diesel
*motor
*motor
comments: a:
: B:
: C:
fuel oil,
oil , etc . )
oil det. limit n
GASOLINE 33ppm
GASOLINE 14ppm
GASOLINE SOppm
15 ppm
LAB USE ONLY
analysts: dm
c CUP: N RUSH: N
.,.j: MILES:
T: D:
I:
vll/90
Reidfewed And
Name: Thomas A. Dean, Jr., Ph.D.
Title: Manager, Environmental Department
"QUALITY SERVICE AT A FAIR PRICE"
5^oiithfrn testing and research laboratories, inc.
3709 AIRPORT DRIVE - WILSON, NC 27893
PHONE (91,9) 237-4175
REPORT OF ANALYSIS
SAMPLE NO.(s): 192V13-14
RECEIVED FROM
NAM
ORG
ADD
CSZ
RAY GRIMES
MANGUM OIL SPILL RES.
P.O. BOX 7177
WILSON, NC 27893
SAMPLE(s) of: SOIL
MARKED A: #5 MIDDl.E
C:
SAMPLE/TEST
ANALYSIS
1 . TPH w/ BTEX d.i
2
DATE OF REPORT: 91/01/29
DATE RECEIVED = 91/01/18
ACCOUNT NO.: 46915
TELEPHONE : [phone]
JOB NO. 0002
for Total Petroleum Hydrocarbon (TPH) analysi.s
B: #5 WEST
D:
NO > A: 192V13 B: 192V14 C D
etinotion ( Watei EPA602 P?«T/GC/PID/HECD )
(So.ll —SW846-5030/8020 /GC/PIO/HECO)
as Gasoline ( ppm)Total TPH
Benzene (PPm)
Chlorobenzene ( PPm)
1 ,2-Dichlorobenzene ( PPm)
1 ,3-Dichlorobenzene ( PPm)
1 ,4-Diohlorobenz.ene ( Ppm )
Ethylbenzene ( PPm )
Toluene ( Ppm)
+ Xylenes ( PPm)
+ MTBE ( ppm)
+ EDB (ppm)
TPH w/o BTEX distinction (Water—SW846-3510/8015 Micro Liq-Liq Ext/HRGC/FTD)
(Soil —SW846-3550/8015 Micro Sonic Ext/HRGC/FID )
L.ow-to-Medium Boiling (ppm): <2 : 24 : =
(gasoline, kerosene,
jet fuel, etc.)
Higher Boiling (ppm): <2
(diesel, fuel oil,
*motor oil, etc.)
*motor oil det. limit = : 15 ppm
COMMENTS: B: UNKNOWN HYDROCARBON ELUTED
<2
IN THE GASOLINE RANGE 24ppm
LAB USE ONLY
analysts: dm
F :UP: N RUSH: N
:: MILES:
. ; D:
I:
vll/90
Reviewe
Name: Thomas n, Jr . , Ph.D.
Title: Manager, Environmental Department
"QUALITY SERVICE AT A FAIR PRICE"
SOUTHERN TESTING 8. RESEARCH LABORATORIES, INC,
3709 AIRPORT DRIVE - WILSON NX. 27893
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
REPORT OF ANALYSIS
SAMPLE NO.(s): 193V1
RECEIVED FROM
NAM : RAY GRIMES
ORG : MANGUM OIL SPILL RESOURC.
ADD : P.O. BOX 7177
CSZ : WILSON, NC 27893
SAMPLE(s) of: SOIL
MARKED A: #5 MIDDLE
C:
SAMPLE/TEST NO
ANALYSIS
PH
TOTAL RESIDUE
TOTAL VOLATILE
TOTAL NONFILT. RESIDUE
TOTAL DISSOLVED RESIDUE
Ron
.■ir.ONIA AS N
TOTAL KJELDAHL NITROGEN
NITRATE AS N
NITRITE
TOTAL PHOSPHATE AS P
CHLORIDE AS CL
OIL AND GREASE
CYANIDE,TOTAL
FLUORIDE
TOC
ALKALINITY
TOTAL HARDNESS
-UNITS-
ppm
ppm
ppm
PPm
ppm
ppm
ppm
ppm
ppm
ppm
ppm
ppm
ppm
ppm
ppm
ppm
ppm
ppm
•METALS-
ARSENIC (ppm
BARIUM (ppm
CADMIUM (ppm
CHROMIUM ( ppm
COPPER (ppm
IRON ( ppm
I..EAD ( ppm
NICKEL ( ppm
MERCURY (ppm
SFI FNIUM ( ppm
VER ( ppm
(ppm
DATE REPORTED : 91/02/04
DATE RECEIVED : 91/01/18
ACCOUNT NO.: 46915
TELEPHONE : [phone]
JOB NO. 0002 HOLLAND'S BP HWY 301 SOUTI-
B:
D:
A: 193V1 B:
4 .9
C D
SOUTHERN TESTING AND RESEARCH LABORATORIES, INC.
3709 AIRPORT DRIVE - WILSON, N.C. 27893
phone [phone] FAX [phone]
ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS REPORT PAGE 2 of 2
SAMPLE/TEST NO.> A: 193V1 B:C D
MICROBIOLOGICAL ANALYSES
COLTFORM, FECAL (/lOOml )
COLIFORM, TOTAL (CFU/lOOml)
•OTHER ANALYSES-
MENTS:
LAB USE ONLY
analysts: DC
PICKUP: N
TIME:
T:
I :
RUSH: N
MILES:
D:
/Oi ^
Rev.i.ewed and Approved
Thomas A. Dean, Jr., Ph.D.
Manager, Env.i.ronmental Department
88 QUALITY SERVICE AT A FAIR PRICE
SOUTHERN TESTING AND RESE^i^CH LABORATORIES. INC.
3709 AIRPORT DRIVE, WILSON. NO 27893
919-237-4175 FAX [phone]
FIELD SAMPLING INFCa^MATIC^ SHEET
CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD(Hazardous Materials and Others)
NOTE: "Riis form nust ^ ccnpleted prior to processing sanples in Laboratory.
(No sanples will be processed without Job No. and Billing Instructions.)
Job No.:—OQO Laboratory Sairple No.:
(Lab Use Only)
Client or System Name: S O//- Syo///
County:
Address: '&r/ T / ^ ^
Date Collected: / ~ I H } Tine Collected:
Sanple Location or Descripticn: cIs K P
a-30 t>r>\
Type of Saiiiple: Water Wastewater ^Sludge Hazardous Waste "-^^ther
DOT or EPA ID No.If Hazardous: Type Code (if any):
Field Information/Comments (or) Sample Handlina Precautions:.
I hereby certify that the above^foif^atl^on is correct.
Collector*^' Certification:'
(Signature)
"Sanple Allocation" and "Chain of Possession": (Sign & Date in Ink)
^ Sionature
1. Sanple Collector:
Date Time (Hrs)
2. Sanple Transporter:/-/S-9i /// 50
3. Sanple Received in Lab:
4. Sanple Analysis Cctnpleted:
Lab Testfsl Requested (List Below):
zcm
Lab Billing Instructions:
Special Instructions or Corments:
1^
O uie.4T i:T LL'c?-r
^tr,xdc/i<
n
rr. U ^ /«/<
n soi u <PK
03'26.■92 10: 59 ®919 872 6747 ESE BIOSCIENCES @002
X
1)
Biosciences, Inc.
ji An Environmental Sdenc© Sz Er-sinvcrin? Company
Analytical Report To;
Attention:
Re:
Oil Spill Resources, irxc.P.O. Box 2311Wilson, NC 27894-2311
Mr. Ray Grimes, Project Manager.
Water Analysis. Comer Oil Company. Holland BP
EBIO is pleased-to submit the following report of an%sis. Plea^ fed^ to tclqthone if furtheris lequiietL Samples will be retamea (o C storage) lor aO days.
SAMPLE HISTORY
EBIO Project No. A365
Sample JD
1
lA
2
2A
3
3A
Sample
Matrix/Deggription
. Water
Water
Water
Water
Water
Water
Date
R^C d.
mom
Date
Analyzed
3/24/92"
3/20/92
3/2^1923/20/92
3l2Am
3/20/92
Page 1 of 8
03/26/92 10:59 0919 872 6747 ESE BIOSCIENCES
analytical results
EBIO Project No. A365
Method
Detection
Mp^snred MstMd Limit fug/L) Result Ul^rlh"^
I Accn^hthene EPA625 tO SDL
Acsnaphthylcne ^
Anthracene n lO "
Benz (a) Anthracene , « i a "
Bca2o(a)Pyiene - in
Benzo (b) Huoranihene • in "Benzo (^u) Pcrylene • m "
BenzoGc)Huoraiaihdoe. ^ «Benzyl BuiylPhthalaie , • „ ; . }a
BIS (ZCtdoroethoxy) Methane - in "BIS (2-Chioroe&yl) Ether " ^ . «
BIS (2-ChIoroisopropyl) Ether ' • ^
BIS (2-Ethylhexyl)Phthalate ^ in • "Bromophenyl Phcnyl Ether. 4- . ^ - • , *
Chl0TOii^hthaIttle.2r • . ^
n ChlorophenylPheDyIEthcr,4- ' ^
Chrysene , •
DlbenzCaOi) Anthracene ^
Dichlorobcnzeoe, 1^- ^ ^
Dichlorobenzeiw^ 13- ^ ^ -Dichlorobenzenc, 1,4- ^ ^ » .
Dichiorobenzi(Jinc, 33- ^ ^ »
Diethyl Phthalaie • , ^ •
Dimethyl Phthalaie ,
Dl-N-ButylPhthalam , ^ lODinltrotoluene. 2.6- ^ ^
Dinicrotolaene, 2.4- ^
Diphenylhydrazine, 1,2- ^ .
DI-N-Octylphihalace ,
Huoranthene „ J
Fluorene ^ . n
Hexachlorobcazene ^
Hexachloicbuiadiene ^ in ' **HexflchiorDcycIopentadiene - 10 "
Hexachloroethane „
Indeno(1.23-cd)Pyrenc
Isophorone . , . „ in
N-Nitroso-DI-N-Propylamine ^
N-N*lirosodimeihylamine ^
N-Niirosodiphcnylnmine - 10 "
N-Nilrosopiperidine - lO
Naphthalene « 10 "
NiuDbenzene ^ .
Phenanthrene ^
n - 10 " •Tfichloiobenzenev 1.2.4- - 2 5
Dcmeton
-Notes: Base/NeutralExtractableOrgamcs n n• C • - dg/L'wmicrograms per liter . . "
" . .BDE == below method detectipn liimt
n |>age2pf 8'V - ;'
Sample
TP NQ^
analytical results
EBIO Project No, A365
MpflsTired
4-Chioro-j-Methyiphenoi
(p-Chloro-m-Cresol)
2-ChlorophDnol
2,4.DicbJorophenol
2,4-Dimeihylphenol
2,4-DiiiitrophenoI2-Methyi-4.6-DimiioplienoI
(4,6-DiiiitiD-o-Crcsol)
2-Nitiophctiol
4-NlcropiiCQOl
Pentachloropbetiol
Phenol
2,4.6'TrichIorophenoi
Method
EPA 625
Method
Detection
T-imit fqg/L^
10
10
10
10
50
50
10
50
50
10
10
Rfifiiilt fag/L>
BDL
Notes:
Add Extractabie Organics
Page 3 of 8
analytical resultsEBIO Project No.. A365MethodSample DetectionID No- PnrflTneter Measnrgd Method Limit fiLg/L) Rggylt ''itg/L)2 Aceflaphthene EPA 625 10 BDLAcenaphAylcnc " 10Anthracene " 10Benz (a) Amhnfficnc " 10Benzo (a) Pyrens " 10Benzo (b) Fluotanthene " 10Benzo fehl) Perylene " 10Benzo (k) Huoianthcne " 10Benzyl BuiyiPhthalate " 10BIS (2-Chloroethoxy) Methane " 10BIS (2-ChIoroetiiyl) Ether " 10BIS (2-ChloTD:sopropyI) Ether " lOBIS (2-E;hyIhexyI) Phthalate " 10BromophOTyiPhenylEtii6r.4- " 10Chloronaphihalcne, 2- ■" 10 • . •ChlorophenylPhenyl Ether,4- " 10Chiysene " 10Dibenz (aji) Anthracene " 10Dichlorobcnzene, 1^- " 10Dichjorobcnzene, 13- " 10Dichlorobenzcne, 1,4- ' 10Dichlorobenzidinc, 33'- " 10Diethyi Phthalate , ' 10Dimethyl Phthalate " 10DI-N-Butyl Phthalate " 10DiniErotoluene,2.6- " 10Dinitrotoluene, 2,4- " 10D^henylhydrazine, 1,2- " 10DI-N-Ociylphlhalate " 10Fluoranthene " 10Ruorene " 10Hexachlorobenzene " 10Hexachlorobinadiene " 10Hexachlorocyclopentadienc " 10Hcxachloroethane " 10Indeno (l33-cd)Pyniiic " 10Isophoronc " 10N-Niiroso-DI-N-Propylamine " 10N-Nitrosodimclhylanune " 10N-Nitrosod^hcnylamine " 10N-Nitrosopiperidinc " 10Naphthalene " 10Nitrobenzene ^ 10Phenanthiche " iOPyrene10Trichlorobenzene, 13.4- " 10Demcion " 2.5Notes: Base/Neutral Extmctable OrganicsPase 4 of 8
Sample
TP No.
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
EBIO Project No. A365
Parameter Measured
4-Chloro-3-Methylphenol
(p-Chloru-m'Cresol)
2-CfaiorophcnoI
2,4-Dichlorophcaol
2,4-DiinethylphefiQl
2,4-DiniiiopliftflQl
2-MethyI-4,6-DiaiirophenoI
(4,6-Dmitn>o-CresoI)
2-'Nitrophenol
4-Nitroph&nol
Pcmachlorophenol
Ph^ol
2,4^Tridilorophenol
Method
EPA 625
Method
Detection
Limit
10
10
10
10
50
50
10
50
50
10
10
Result riJ.^/T,>
BDL
Notes;
Acid Extraciable Organics
Page 5 of 8
analytical results
EBIO Project No. A365
Sample
TP No.Pytram^ter IVteasiircd
Acenaphthene
Acenaphthylfios
Anthracene
Benz (a) Anthracene
Benzo (a) Pyrenc
Beazo (b) fluoianthenc
Bcnzo (ghi) Perylene
Benzo (k) Ruorantheoe
Benzyl Butyl Phthalatc
BIS (2-ChlQroetho;*:y) Methane
BIS (2-ChIoroethyl) Ether
BIS (2.Chloroisopropyl) Ether
BIS C2.Echylhexyl)Phihaiaie
Bromophenyl Phenyl Ether, 4-
Chlorcnaphthalene", 2-
Chlbrophenyl Phenyl Ether, 4-
Chrysene
Dihenz (a^i) Anthracene
Dichlorobenzene, 1.2-
Dichlorobenzene,. 13-
DichlorobenzOTe, 1,4-
Dichlorobenzadine, 3 3'-
DiethylPhthalate'
Olmethyl Phthalaie
DI-N-Butyl Phthalaie'
Dinicrotolucae, 2,6- •
Dlmtrotoluene, 2,4-
Diphenylhydrazine, 13-
DI-N-Ociylphthalate
Fluoranthene
Fluoicnc
Hexachlorobeozene
HKcachlorobutadicae
Hcxachlorocyclopeniadicne
Hcxacblaroethane
IndOTo (13.3-cd.) P>'rene
Isophotone
N-Nitroso-DI-N-Propylamine
N-Nitrosodimeihylaii^ne
N-Nitrosodiphenylaminc
N-Nitrosopiperldine
Naphthalene
NItiobenzene
Phenanihrenc
Pyrece .
Trichlorobenzene» 13.4-
Demeton
Notes: Base/Neutral Extractable Organics
Method
EPA 625
Method
Detection
Limit fug/L)
10
10
10
10
10
ID
10
ID
10
10
10
10
10
. 10
10
10
10
10
10
10
ID
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
TO
2^
BDL
Page 6 of 8
UO' ^V I c X c ^ r jb
Sample
in No.
analytical results
EBIO -Project No. A365
Parameter Mea.sured
4-ChIoro-3-Methylphenol
(p-Chloro-m-CKSoI)
2-Chloropiieaoi
2,4~DichIorqphenol
2,4-Diniethylpheool
2.4-DiniiroplieaQl
2-Methyl-4,6-Diiiitrophenol
(4,6-DiiiiirQ-o-Ciesol)
2-Niiioplienol
4-^StI0pllenQl
PentacWoropiiwiQl
Phenol
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
\fethnd
EPA 625
Method
Detection
Limit rug/Ll
10
10
10
10
50
50
10
SO-
SO
10
' 10
Result rug/L)
BDL
Notes:
Acid Exiractable Organics
Page 7 of 8
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
EBIO Project No. A 365
\. i Mod
Delation
?8Tnple ID Parameter -Measured Method Limit fDDb>Re.soi. DDb)
LA Benzene EPA 602 200 200
Toluene II 5.0 18
EtiiylbcDzene "5.0 5.0
Xylenes rr 5.0 13
2A Benzene EPA6(r 1.0 BDL
Toluene 1.0 BDL •
Ethylbenzene II :-0 BDL
Xylenes It 1.0 BDL
3A Benzene EPA 602 0 BDL
••. Toluene It ,.0 BDL
.Ethylbenzene It 1.0 BDL-
Xylenes 11 1.0 n BDL
.y
NOTES;
jPase 8 of 8 • •
Analytic;- cport Issued by:
ESE BIOSCIENCES, INC.
.LV/J
D CM wJiiliiUuS
Title: Manager. Laboratory Onerations
Date:^125192
291 "oi'Csfxtt ;RESC.^»7'^!vt*■'. -1^
• ^Sample
• ro Not
■■ -F2'. ■;;
analytical RESULTS
EBIO Project No. A399 ;
•; ■ Pflrameter Measured
; ; JBenz^'' ,:. . ,
: . Toluene .. . : --.1 ■"JEthylbenzeue'^ ■, ■■
■■- Xylenes. ■
; Method ■
.■Detection .Method LLEoiLipptQ
. • •• .EPA 602 25.
1.0.
Kft^nlt (ppt)
.120. .
4J4 ■;
• ii-
!•.. • . i
' • . "Notest : . Date'DfAr^yas; 5/l'U92 v' ..,;\ - ppb = p.artsperbilfion (jigpouter) ■'
I
.*r
h ■
Page 2 of 4 !
\ • *
UP' ^ I ' tli.V I . OO
Sample
TP No>
F2 nn
analytical results
EBiO Project No.- A399
J Notes;
Parameter-Measured -
; .. AccnaphihcDe
Acenaptithylene
■.[ ' Antinticene . ' •
' V * BcnadineBenz (a) Antoccne -' ■; BeiKO(a);P>Teiie.- 'Benzb (b) Huoranlli^eBenzo (^) .
Benzo (k) Huonuiibcae • .Benzyl Butyl Phihalare ' . - ' '
. • BIS (2.GiilQroetboxy) Methane• BIS-b-ChlDrpethyl)Ethef;.*• ■ BIS (2-ChloroisbijrDphyl).Ether , • :
.i ■ BIS (2-Ethylhpcyl) Pbtbalate • .• 4,BroniQphenyl Phenyl Eth^•'
• ■ 2-ChlQrcfnaplillialene .4'ClilorDpbenylPiien.ylEther. .
i • • Chrysene -' I •••'.. -rSbeozCa^)Aiithracene. J -l^-DidilQrobenzene/'i '. i;3-DichlorobenzeDe . ' • ..•.•■•1,4-IXchlQrDbenzenc
•:: ' • 33*-I>idilcffobenzi<iinc ■'
. . . DieihylPiithalaie .. •t •* ' Dhnethyl Phthalaie- .■ ^
' . -. DI-N-Butyl Piithalaie • :
•,: ■ ■ 2,4-Dinitrotoloene
■■ 2,6-DiiiitrolbIueiie •i; 1,2-Diphe>nlijyte!ifie •' •J • • DI-N-Octyiphihalaie :•
Elnoranthciie;
. Huotene.
■ Hexachldrobenzenc •Hexadilorobntaificae- ^
•1 . * ■ .Hexachloiocydope^i^iiene
i •'nexadiiQroetbaneSj.' ■ ■;:lmlenoa^<^)?y«:ae ■•j. V . ! Iso^rone ■ •
I ■ ; .Naphthalene V , • '■j •• . '•J^trobenzene' j- . N-Niirosoclunetby]aii^O- '■*! "■ . N-NitfosoDI'N-Propylamine ..• i . . ' N-Nitrosodiphenylamine "
1 - Phcnanthrene " • • * '; ! - Pyreoc■■ ■ 1,2,4-TtichIorpbenzeiie
j • Demeton • -" ' • • '.
-liiteofAnalysis.: 5/15/92 .. . .B&se/NeutralExtractable Orgamcs .
Method-
EPA-625
Method' ,
Detection
■■■10
ResTilt- Ylig/P
BCJ.-
IS
Page 3 of 4
• n Sample
; . m No.
. .^ALYTICi^ RESUITS.
n EBiO Project No. A399
iParaTneter Mps-^^red.
4-Qiloro-3-Meiliylphendl
i- (p-Qilpro-m-Cre^) n
f... .^^falorophenpl • . .
; • 2,^^r)ichldropbcnol _■' ■2,4-I3imetIiylphetipi'. •
2^4^I)ihitroplienol .• 2-MeihyM/6-DiiutropIienol
!• • ■ . (4,.^DbntrCK>^CrBS0l).i^NitropbenoI •
■.•Peniachloioplienol -
i • . • piienol ■ •. '. ," 2,4,6-TnchlOrppl^or •
Method
EPA 625 •
Method- . ■. ■ ■Detection •'T.imTt (iigAD EmiljCusSl
. 10'
50-
lo:
50
m
.10■ «•'
•BIX.- .
ji -
Jt
• ?•»
« .t. '
■ ■' .Notesr",' ■ DatB-ofAnalyst v._
Analytical Report Issa^ by:
, INC.
T tie:
Date:
Manager. T.i^hnratorv Operations
; Page4of4
3208 SPRING FOREST ROAD
RALEIGH. NC 27604
(919) 872~96B6or [phone]
chmWof-custody record
Page No..of
432OCl
'roject Location
^reject Number
Client Name
3^mpled:By^..STgVC^^U?Pjft
Oil 5piH
^Yt 1 1Project Manager
Project Telephone No, 3*)^ '011'^—
Date/Tlrne 3-1^
_____ Sampler Affiliation
Item
dumber.
Sample
Number
Number & size
of Containers Date/Time
,1 rw
Sample Description
UJATtf
ANALYSES TO BE PERFORfWiED
I
\Q
<Q
V
I
0)
-a
E
/
Trartsf.er. N.ymber
& Check
.2 3 4 6
marks (use back of whito copy If naoossary)
.1
I'rvislnf
NUnbur
llUlk
hJiiiiAct Rolinqulshecl by/Afflllatlon Accomoo DWATiiiiauon Dale
\
t
Time
3! IS
APPENDIX B
Soil Boring Logs
RICHMOND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
SOIL BORING RECORD
PROJECT
PROJECT NUMBER:
BORING NUMBER: < ^ (
INSTALLATION DATE: (^hy
METVIOD:
CONTRACTOR: uiT
LOCATION SKETCH
©) f/f-'
COMMENTS:
e
Sample
Number
Depth
Interval
Description Field
Screen
Notes
/g ^
tji-
-*ttL . jjy»< 6J*y
it
ct^kf j •^.;^ ^sKt-niM^rp
H r
73;^■7^
I 1
TOTAL BORING DEPTH: , BORING DIAMETER: ^ ''
FIELD REPRESENTATIVE: PAGE _j_ OF ^
RICHMOND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
SOIL BORING RECORD
PROJECT:
PROJECT NUMBER;
en /fP
Z** c « *» /
' IBORING NUMBER:
INSTALLATION PATE: 7 /.
METTiOP: HoU^
CONTRACTOR: t<- > r . Tr^< n
LOCATION SKETCH
y*' e
7r
CIJ A/
COMMENTS:
Sample
Number
Depth
Interval
Description Field
Screen
Notes
3
1.' Z/f " Ajt \ l . „ !
g I ' I
f.tfsM'yy V \ ^jV^/
I /' i * A \ y^j ^ ^ at 52^
-I 1-
-I f
ZC i n l >e-^-"hr
1 r
TOTAL BORING DEPTH:
FIELD REPRESENTATIVE:
BORING DIAMETER:
PAGE OF r
RICHMOND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
SOIL BORING RECORD
PROJECT:
PROJECT NUMBER: oo -2.
BORING NUMBER:
INSTALLATION
METHOD:
CONTRACTOR:
NUMBER:_
ATION,DATEi V/7,1 / - 7 /if A
h ikA-
CTOR: i>vAir y l ^'~
LOCATION SKETCH
$5-^I
4 /
f'
COMMENTS; "^W-l ('^h^
Sample
Number
Depth
Interval
Description Field
Screen
Notes
-i L
Aj^.r ;5i3r7*^i m
1 r-
m gfPeagl ^7'
1 ^
Nir*^-64-'g^TT-^
■1 r
i i
TOTAL BORING DEPTH: ?y ^
FIELD REPRESENTATIVE:
BORING DIAMETER:
PAGE ' OF 7-
RICHMOND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
SOIL BORING RECORD
PROJECT: ,
PROJECT NUMBER:LOCATION SKETCH
BORING NUMBER
INSTALLATION
METHOD:
CONTRACTOR:
\T\ON DAf^^ hf f^1
:J j } ^ ^'1 rt j r
COMMENTS:
Sample
Number
Depth
Interval
Description Field
Screen
Notes
6Ay4l} •.
' u/' t1,, ..j ,. , nnn ,. ' ^—
44\u
3E
s
^=3yj3:
±
2_
\ \hi. 'O^h
CLA^ ft .■i'TO ; A piKi^
J/.y. I
jTi/^vUg' L-i
jr.fyw//y, ^ ' (U ■m.
fb JUJ' &
TOTAL BORING DEPTH: t
FIELD REPRESENTATIVE:
BORING DIAMETER:
PAGE / OF
APPENDIX C
Well Construction Records
L/^CL
OaTH CAROLINA CSPAnTMiJ.T O? NATURAL RCCQ'J=:;S *f.'0 Cv/'."-'--'
DIVISION OF £NViaONM=MTAL MANAoCMENT - O'.'-.OV/.- .
P.O. BOX 27687 -RALEICH.N.C. 27G I I. (9 19)733-2:2 1
WELL CCMSTRUCTION RECOFD
- i ^ S".- n
CuEci. No.
L2t
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
Serial No.
Long.Pc
l/i.oor 3asin .
Sasin Code .
Header Ent..G\V-i 2n,,
BILLING CONTRACTOR // TT5^ Jn<.-
RILLER REGISTRATION NUMBER /i25.
STATE WELL CONSTRUCTION
PERMIT NUMBER; ^ ' O'^OO'W/Tl
WELL LOCATION: (Show sketch cl the location dsiov/)
jj )i/sOA/Naaresi lov/n:
//fwy p-..y/M/V ,iC-
Cc.-.ly; _
.
(Road. Coinmuniiy. o.' Suioivisic.*- and Lot f-o.)
OWNER l-^.0.-^})pnPir/ ic^(r\^rn\ CQ,j
address P-O- 7IJ ../) ~ (si/ee! or i^o^s
Depth
10
D.RiLLING LOG
Formation OescrlDtio.n
r?'
C://c: -o^r. ' ^ ^
O.-E D^ILLHO USE 0= v.E.L
..,==T-- N' CJTTINGS CCU.ECTEO U v=i ^Ho ° ■* '1^:0'-L3 (- . ^ ./V
DDES ^v=LL REF.aCE v/ELL? U ^STATIC water LEVE. ^ FT. g OF C^SWG.
TOP OF CASI.nG iS_^ F^oO' E _.-.Nu- ;D.-.7-^w3.
V (5pfo.); A' y,;TH.03 0-"
ME3 (062:01:.1 iONi
IZOCK.
^/j'/vpy nAi
<Mo
rl/4Y
Y)^ss- niAi
g;-;lo.rima7icn;
:. CASING:
Am:.*;
izz ;.3na! soac? is nsecac lS; back oi !c-v
From Q
• D'smetef
--2 --■ J"
Kstsriai OCATION SKETC.H ^ /
From
■i. G.EO'JT:
From
Ffon
2. SCREEN;
rl..
($:*:.••• C'r«r ;■ end cirtance from a: -esst two Sie'.s Roaos.
Of :;"-sr ; "sierence points)
— IC '
Da:;-.
^0 Tr^ ^ Ft
.v.atrisi i4iz\*-Z"Z ^^jureQ^
\ 1-P' T. -3 Ft.I'-fe
/-3 to-/5e,.
Qiameter Slot S'le Material
7 H .0/Y) i„. /^rc
Li i.n
In in
■aCK;
Oeoih .-3' TO-/-/ Fl /? i^cH Material
<AfJD
To Pi
<-174.7-
<Lclo
wCU-
a,
301
REMARKS:
I 00 HcR
STANO
lE =ESr CSSTIEV -HAT THIS VV£, L SVAS COKSTRUCTlOH
■N<'
fjOHIM UAHUClrtA U:,-ArviM;r.i v.- —
DlVISiON Or J.WNAouf.'iST - ;sC'-"OWATsr? tlZ'lZH
P.O. BOX 2?5S7 - SALitOH.H.O. 2761*. PK2:»= (919)723-3*..'
V/ELL CCN'STRUCTICN RECORD
DRILLING CONTRACTOR /// J /S, -i/?C-
FOR OFFICE USE OKLY
C-.'si. Nq Serial f-.'o
L£:
'.iinor Secin .
sasi.T Code ,
Header EnL,
Uong.Pc
GV/-1 Em
D.RILLER REGISTRATION N'USIBER ^ ^^70
STATE WELL CONSTRUCTION
PERMIT NUMBER: H1 - O3.C>0'iA}D'] 'nOi
\. WELL LOCATION: (Show skeicn o( the locatico 35iov/)
f.'earesi Town: _ T^z/s-Q/?Cc.-^ty; /JJy'An/r^
(Road. CofTimun/iy. o.- Scooivisic.* and Lot No )
2. OV/NER _P. ^en/?.)// (fli
Deoin
Frcrr.7o
address ^ 0' ^ P —)
r ' C!5;i Zi3 C(Cily=.'TOV.T, n Si=t= ,
DATE ORILUED USE 0= V.-J. OkdjJs^^Ai^. S ^ * '10^
< TOTAL DEFT.-: ___ZjC_ CO'.LECTEC Jvsi^Ko ll2. i—/^L-
i. DOES V'/SLL SEELaCE ETIST:,:; '.VELL? D ^ A:; ;-.T,A wit;? . =■.;: /A fT. ^-TV!: 'O? C'.= C.-S.^iG.
TOP 0? CASING l.S ^ P"- AoO'- i
7. ^"lELO (50*^):
d
".'.ETHOD op Ti?'
drilling log
Forms:ion OescriD'ton
6'^tl'i CIa-^ (/€gtf
<ArJO
rlAiDer^SE a at
T£R 20NH3 (csStfi):A.
/Z/GHLORIMATION: Ty?* Iff Ami".
•0 CASING:
rren*
Prc.'h
Fforr.
1 1. G.PO'JT;
Diameig:
7' .= t
.".'.sisria'j4-
!i sir'-s-nai S02C5 is needed •-•js bac!-: oi !c-.*.".
LOCATION SKrTG.:-;^
(S;*:.v cifs::.:" ana ci«:2nc9 irom i: issgt j.-o Sis's Roar-
Of r.it "sisfsr.cs ooir.is)
0cf€/2- -h Stis-kk
Da::-
"5 Ft- UFfon-i 2 ic-
\-i. SCREEN;
-?'
Deatn
Tc
To r
Ffom_To r
Oiameief S'oi S'ls Witsriel
"1-
'•1.,
I.-.
i.n.
iS. GRAVEL PACK:
From
From,
t<. REWAfiKS;
Deo;.-. , sue ''aisf?'^ To"// Fi. 6 irJC^ ^^^-0
To.Ft.
I 00 H-ESY C=RT'FV THAT THIS V.'ELL WAS IN aC30RDa'jC£ WITH i5 NCAC 2C. WELL CONSTRUCTIONS---S. A. that a CO. or T.S AECosy^yaov^o;. .sa ^
SIGNATL'.PS C.= contractor O.s. agent OaTE
KOaTH CAROLINA 0£?ARTM-!-'l Oh ">>' "c- jur.s.s.j -iu . t-v .'^c
DIVISION OF cNVIRC!;!.-=MTAL l.'AIIACG'.'c.sr - :: = 0'j:tC'.VATS?, SES'ICN
P.O. BOX 27 537 - aAL£lC;-:,M.C. 27011. PHC'-'H (9195722-3:2 1
WELL CON'STRUCTICN RECORD
FOR OFFICE USE OULY
Qwad. No.
Lai
Serial No.
Long.
Minor Basin
sasin Code .
Header Enl..
Pc
GW-1 Em
ORiLLING CONTRACTC.R ^TT-TT-
moDRILLER REGISTRATION NUMBER
1. WELL LOCATION: (Shov/ sketch ol Ihe locaiion dslov/)
Nearest Town:IL&Orl
STATE WELL CONSTRUCTION
PERMIT NUMBER; - nr){^ O
3oi 4 lor A
(Road. Coninunliy. or Sccolvisic.". and Loi t-Jo.) ^ •<
2, OWNER C. 7 V ( Car^€K. C(c Ok
AOORESS P'O . ^
C0-*:iy;(jdHSOhJ
Deoth
Ffc.T.lO
drilling log
Formaiion Dsscrioiion
. , 'Lrireei or Rouii Lio.)JmLl ^CUrT-f- Pc p7d^Q- 1^/ ,
Ci;*/v.* Town Stats a'O Case ^ ,, ,v .
2. D.aTE drilled use of V.-r.L ^ ^ ^
<. T.-n-At riCST^: CUTTINGS COLLECTED U^Si ^ No "/^
E. DOES WELL nEFLACE •TiSTii.'D v.'ELL? Q V55 ^ N: —
5. ETATiC Water Lav'^L; FT- r": "
TOP 0? CASING !S FT. ASC- E LAND i^.F.'ACE.
rJAj
?. ^"lELO (qp
TER ZONES (cspthl:
'.'.ElKOD 0.= TEST
s. C:-;l0RIMA7I0N- Ty?®
:C=. CASING:
Am:-.':
Diameter ;• v.'=:;/:'.-: .■.■ = :=riai
/•
!: si: ■-s.nai ssaca is naeseo vss bsc'-; oi Icrm.
rfcm
.-fcm
From
1 :. -G-FOUT:
From
-3 Pj-C
IC
..-I..
LOCATION SKE'C:-:^?
(S:*:.v cira:;.:' and distance irom a: :aast i-.vo S:s*.= Fca:s.
or n: -sierence points?
-h $l<e-k.l
Da::-*.
To 'J Ft.
From Tn "J
12. SCREEN;
Dcptn Qiamelsr 5io! S'za Matsriai. ueptn Diameter oio. a'ls Maiarigi
From
From
From.
3 1c'~f'3 Ft. w...O{0 in. p\I^
'c.
To.
Ft.
Ft.
:.n,
i.l.
in.
in.
13. GRAVEL PACK:
From
From,
1^. .REMARKS:
.Deo:.'. Sirs Maiena'"3 Tn-// Ft. § /rTCH 6A^O
Ft.
I 00 HS.RSSY CERTIFY THAT THIS WELL -vaS CCNSTP.UCTEO IN ACCCROan'CE Wl^ iS NCAC 2C. WELL COnSTRUCT'CNSTanOa.ROS akO that a copy Or T:-:S RSCO.'O has 3E£n PROvio^^O THS wE^y^wrtHR./J7/T rmm/,, ^
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
Raleigh Regional Office
James G. Martin, Governor William W. Cobey, jr., Secretary
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
July 9, 1990
Comer Oil Company
P.O. Box 711
Rocky Mount, N.C. 27802-0711
Attention: H. C. Shearin
Subject: Tank Closure
Holland's Gulf Station
U.S. Hwy. 301 and Goldsboro Road
Wilson, N.C.
Wilson County
Dear Mr. Shearin:
The Division of Environmental Management is in receipt of your
request for tank closure and the site assessment report dated April
1990. Based on this information, we consider this site closed in
accordance with Federal Regulations 40 CFR Part 280, Subpart G and
the North Carolina "Guidelines for Remediation of Soil Contaminated by
Petroleum".
The Division does, however, reserve the right to reopen this site
and require further investigation or remediation activities if data or
other information collected at a future date indicate the presence of
further contamination.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please contact
Babette McKemie.
Sincerely, ^
/S. Jay Zimmerman
'I ' Hydrogeological Regional Supervisor
Groundwater Section
Raleigh Regional Office
SJZ:BMc:cs
3800 Barrett Drive, Suite 101 • Raleigh, N.C 27609
Telephone [phone] • FAX Number [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer
fOnTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT, HEALTH AND NATURAL RESOURCES
CNVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT - GROUNDVIIATER SECTION
P.O. BOX 27687 - RALEIGH, NC 2761V7687
PHONE (919)733*3221
WELL CONSTRUCTION RECORD
DRILLING CONTRACTOR MST fr) T
DRILLER REGISTRATION NUMBER 1133.
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
OiiAri. No.Serial No.
1 at Lonn Pr*
OW-1 Fnt
STATE WELL CONSTRUCTION
PERMIT NUMBER: 9 7 > OO UJm n 0113
1. WELL LOCATION: (Show sketch of the location below)
Nearest Town;
30l SoHjTkf
County:W luso//
i. C<
Z6
(Road, Community, or Subdivision and Lot No.)
2. OWNER ComEfZ Oil, (LO.
Depth
From
MtfOF
To
AJL
DRILLING LOG
Formation Description iBC)
ADDRESS iss:^SouuTH h- ^T"
(Street or Route No.)"Roccw mcumX avZ " A7S0Z-cnn ^
Citv or Town State ZiD Code ^ '1r ^ ^1ZC(ty or Town State Zip Code
To nro S4^t>'M»*sr 3//3
I* '* H f* tt
,
6- 3o-9 t ysE OF WELL A?OAr/rg>Z. USPU. S /t 7 y
IS * CUTTINGS COLLECTED □ Yes ® No 'llh
TAM yp irflAl m:?Y
#r
3. DATE DRILLED
4. TOTAL DEPTH.
5. DOES WELL REPLACE EXISTING WELL? □ Yes SI No
6. STATIC WATER I FVFI ■ 7.35" FT. Q^ove TOP OF CASING,
TOP OF CASING IR ^ "
7. YIELD (gpm): AJ Af METHOD OF TEST
8 WATER ZONES (depth); _
□ aboveB'^lowFT. ADOYC LAND SURFACE.
IS'
yiii.
f2K7 /V '
fit' 7 IS*
ASPffAt-'T
jjoe-r 76 rf-/L)»y
DSi^Se tCAif -HAAO n/l/U./^A-
A/ -7-7-/3tf
atAy RAAAK/K.C- T/^iS
vbtH
9. CHLORINATION:
10. CASING:
Type /JA Amount
Wall ThicknessDepth Diameter or Weight/Ft. Material
2 tz' Ft 2 "From To ^ pt Z
From To Ft
From To Ft
11. GROUT:
Depth Material MethodFromTn zh Ft. Sg4m)A^/ys/efM*A^^ -
From To Ft.
12. SCREEN:
^ L* A ASPAAf'f M>>AS
If additional space is needed use back of form.
LOCATION SKETCH
(Show direction and distance from at least two State Roads,
or other map reference points)
z'W
Depth Diameter Slot Size Material
From T„ 15'Ft.2"in.. 0 / 0 in.
To Ft.in.in.
From.Tn Ft in,In.
13. GRAVEL PACK:
From,
From.
4ARKS:
2'U'
Depth
To
To
Size
Ft. ToflP^bo
Ft.
Material
I DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS WELL WAS CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH 15 NCAC 2C, WELL CONSTRUCTION
STANDARDS, AND THAT A COPY OF THIS RECORD H^S-SHiN^ROVIDED TO THE WELL OWNER.
GW-1 REVISED 2/90
SIGNATURE 07 CONTRACTOR OR AGENT DATE
Submit original to Division of Environmental Management and copy to well owner.
north CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT. HEALTH AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION Of ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT n GROUNDWATER SECTION
P.O. BOX 27687 - RALEIGH, NC 27611>7687
PHONE [phone]
WELL CONSTRUCTION RECORD
DRILLING CONTRACTOR /n A ^ T—
DRILLER REGISTRATION NUMBER
1. WELL LOCATION: (Show sketch of the location below)
Nearest Town: . W/ L 3g/v .C,
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
Serial No.
1 at 1 Ann Pr
f3W-l Pnt
STATE WELL CONSTRUCTION
PERMIT NUMBER:
i4u»y 3^f S&uirtf- mEa-zl. 2C»y
County:U/ f CiSoA/
Depth DRILLING LOG
(Road. Community, or Subdivision and Lot No.)
2. OWNER A1 QtL, (to
From To
7"
ADDRESS
(Street or Route No.)
A/g-29^01^ o7//
3. DATE DRILLED
4. TOTAL DEPTH.
Jity or Town Slate Zip Code
USE OF WELL ^AAZ/rtf/L
2" y T.'/,'
21.-7 3'U'
Formation Description
A&PHAcT
Tfl^o
IS' ^ CUTTINGS COLLECTED □ Yes 0-No Z/ y. ' >» '/, /ft (f 4- LilAtt
5. DOES WELL REPLACE EXISTING WELL? □ Yes No
6. STATIC WATER LEVEL: FT. Qabove TOP OF CASING.^ B^elowFTTOP OF CASING IS
7. YIELD (gpm): _
. AflLUIh LAND SURFACE.8«/«*o
8. =R ZONES (depth):
_ METHOD OF TEST
' -r iS'
1'!:.' 7 8'A
ii-V2'7 9'1-
g'-9"7 y^z.'
t'/^' 7 nK
12'L 7 J<f'
in' 7/y/t-'
9. CHLORINATION:
to. CASING:
Type
" CCAJ a/tA^4-StCAj'i4fSr' 3 ^^7
ClAJ AUA4»t'ft'A' 7% oriA^g €4^
0/ZA^t-EC^/IA^ r» o/u^^ts-S C<-Af
B/U»AN/i3ftAf^AA7
2 2 t
Amount
From
From
From
11. GROUT:
From
From
12. SCREEN:
From
From
From
Depth
To <2 'f\.
Wall ThicknessDiameter or Weight/Ft. Material
p. 7." SCIh-tC 0*2-
If additional space is needed use back of form.
LOCATION SKETCH
(Show direction and distance from at least two State Roads.
To
To
.Ft..
-Ft..
or other map reference points)S8'2-
Depth Material Method
Maph Tn
To.Ft..
■zK
Depth
_To.IS
To,
To.
.Ft.
Ft.
Ft.
Diameter
Z"
Slot Size Material
ki. ,tifO in.
ia In.
in m.
13. GRAVEL PACK:
From
From
lARKS:
Depth Size
Zh' To \6 ' Fl -T/g/»#/>!-To.
.To.
Material
fi F SfA,
Ft..
I DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS WELL WAS CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH 15 NCAC 2C. WELL CONSTRUCTIONSTANDARDS. AND THAT A COPY OF THIS RECORD HASJEEfcLgpOVlDED TO THE WELL OWNER.^"JqO^^NTRACTOR OR AGENT
GW-1 REVISED2/90
SIGNATURE 0^5*^NTRACT0R OR AGENT DATE
Submit original to Division of Environmental Management and copy to well owner.
{
APPENDIX D
Bail Test Results
October 16,1992
Mr. Martin Richmond
P.O. Box 5336
Raleigh, North Carolina
27650
Re: Results of Bali Testing
Wilson Project Site
\\i^'
ci-
.C
Dear Mr. Richmond:
Attached are the results of the bail tests conducted at the project site in Wilson, NO. Environmental
Investigations, Inc. appreciates the opportunity to have provided you with these services. Should you
have any question or concerns please contact us at [phone].
Sincerely,
William A. Cotton
Gary D^BabbJ^.G.
Vice President
AQUIFER CHARACTERISTICS
Ball Test
Environmental Investigations personnel along with Richmond Environmental Services representatives
conducted aquifer tests (I.e. bail tests) in monitor wells MW-1, MW-2, MW-3, MW-4, MW-6 and DW-1
at the project site in Wilson, NO, on October 14, 1992. The water table depths In each well were
measured prior to each test. The water column thicknesses in the wells were adequate to provide
reasonable data. An In-situ model SE 10000 Hermit Data Logger system with two submersible pressure
transducers was used to record the water level changes in each well during the ball tests. The
transducers were towered Into the wells followed by a disposable bailer. The top of the bailer was
positioned just below the groundwater table. The aquifer was allowed to stabilize for approximately 30
minutes prior to starting the tests. After stabilization, the data logger was turned on and the bailers
quickly removed from the wells, causing an instantaneous change In the groundwater level. The data
logger recorded changes In the water table height every 5 seconds. Usable bail test data was retrieved
from wells MW-i, MW-3 and DW-1. The Hvorslev method was used to interpret the data collected.
The following parameters were calculated: hydraulic conductivity, transmissivlty, and radius of Influence
(see Appendix A, Bail Test and Aquifer Characteristics Data). Although the data from each of the wells
tested has been presented here, the data obtained from the test conducted in monitor well MW-3 was
used In the design of the treatment system.
Results of Aquifer Tests
A plot of field recovery data,H/Ho verses t (according to Hvorslev's method), should show a decline in
recovery rate with time when plotted on a semi-logarithmic graph paper. The value of Tp. basic time lag,
Is measured graphically and hydraulic conductivity (K) Is determined from the following equation:
K=:r^ In fURUR/dav^
2LTo
Where r^ radius of the well in feet.
R» radius of the borehole in feet.
Ls length screen in or the thickness of the water-saturated formation In feet.
Time in minutes.
The calculated K for the three wells. MW-1, MW-3 and DW-1, resulted in the following:
MW-1: K-0.32 Ft/day
MW-3: K = 0.11 Ft/day
DW-1: K» 0.08 Ft/day
ENVIRONMENTAL INVESTIGATIONS, INC. • 1911 Meredith Drive • Suite 250 • Durham, NC 27713 • TEL [phone] • FAX [phone]
i2-r.''d
H/a
'fl MW-1 10/14/92
Hydraulic Conductivity
K-r^ In /URUFt/davl
2LTo
Where: K> Hydraulic Conductivity
r« radius of the wet! in feet, « .0833 FT.
R- radius of the borehole in feet. « .3540 FT.
L- length screen in or the thickness of the
water-saturated formation in feet. « 6.9 Ft.
To- Time it takes for the water level to
rise to 37% of the initial change, in minutes,
- 6.7 min.
K. .0833* In f6.9/.35401
2 X 6.9 X 6.7
K-.QQ69 In19.4915
92.46
K- .0069 X 2.97
92.46
K-
K» .0002 X 60 X 24
— K- 0.32 Ft/day
Semi-Logarithi ^ .Q 5.O
Cycles X 10 to tfa«30 40
TIME (MINUTESI
■■Z-fza
H/R
f. Where: K» Hydraulic Conductivity
MW-3 10/14/92
Hydraulic Conductivity
^ K.r' In /URUFt/davl
2LTo
r> radius of the well in feet, » .0833 FT.
R" radius of the borehole in feet, •> .3540 FT.
L» length screen In or the thickness of the
water-saturated formation in feet. > 8.02 Ft.
Tq^ Time it takes for the water level to
rise to 37% of the Initial change, in minutes,
«17 min.
K« .0833' In (6.9/.35401
2x8.02x17
K= .0069 In 22.6554
272.68
K. .0069x3.1204
" ' ^ 272.68
.0215
272.68
K- .0001 X 60 X 24
K-0.11 Ft/day
Semi*Loftaiithi 1.0 5.0 10
t Cycles X 10 to th..20 30 40
TIMP /mFmiitbc^
-.z-i&a
H/H.
DW-1 10/14/92
Hydraulic Conductivity
TtnirT--^ K=r' In /lyRUFt/davt
2LT„
Where: K> Hydrauiic Conductivity
tm radius of the weil in feet, « .0833 FT.
Rb radius of the borehole in feet, « .3540 FT.
L- length screen in or the thickness of the
water-saturated formation in feet. « 5.0 Ft
Tgo Time it takes for the water level to
rise to 37% of the initial change, in minutes,
n 32.7 min.
K- .0833^ In f5.0/.35401
2x5.0x32.7
K«.0069 In 14.12143
K« .0069 X 2.6479
327
K- .0001 X 60 X 24
K- 0.08 Ft/day
Semi-LoftariChi^.O 5.0 10
Cycles X 10 to ths. ...wh
TtMC /lAlkii
APPENDIX E
Laboratory Analysis Reports
GeoChem, Incorporated
Environmental Laboratories
July 23, 1992
Mr. Martin Richmond
Richmond Environmental Services
P.O. Box 5336
Raleigh, NC 27650
Reference: Holland BP
GCI# 9207-017
Dear Mr. Martin Richmond:
This is the analytical report for the above referenced
project. On July 7, 1992 we received four soil samples for
analysis. The analytical and quality control results are presented
in separate tables for your convenience. Brief summaries of
analytical methods employed are as follows.
TPH
Samples are analyzed by following the California U.S.T.
manual. This methodology incorporates EPA purge and trap (meth.
5030) techniques for analysis of volatile fuels such as gasoline.
Less volatile fuels such as diesel fuel and kerosene must be
extracted using solvents prior to analysis (soils are sonicated,
meth. 3550). A standard calibration curve is created from the pure
fuel of interest. The standards serve two functions; they create
a "finger print" pattern for comparisons and they allow the chemist
to calculate the concentration of that fuel analyzed for.
If there are any technical questions please feel free to call
me at 919-460-8093. Thank you for allowing GboChbm to serve your
analytical needs.
Sincerely
in Gokel
President
2500 Gate Way Centre Blvd., Suite 300 • Morrisvilie. NC 27560
Telephone: 919-460B093 • FAX: 919-460^167
GeoChem, Incorporated
Environmental Laboratories
Geochem(NC #336/SC #99008)
Project#9207-017 Site Name Holland BP
LAB ID.
DATE SAMPLED
FIELD ID.
2995
7/01/92
HA-IA
2996
6/30/92
HA-2B
2997
7/01/92
HA-4A
MSTROD
ANALYTE
TPH/gas
mg/kq t?al
40 2.0
mq/ka £3l mq/kq pql
35 5.7 BDL 1.0
LAB ID.
DATE SAMPLED
FIELD ID.
2998
7/01/92
HA-7B
NBTHOD
ANALYTE
TPR/gas
mq/kq pql
BDL 1.0
soil water
parts per million = mg/kg mg/1
parts per billion = ug/kg ug/1
pql « practical guantitation limit due to matrix effects,
bdl « below method detection limit,
bql » below guantitation limit.
2500 Gate Way Centre Blvd., Suite 300 • Morrisviile, NO 27560
Telephone: [phone] • FAX: [phone]
GeoChem, Incorporated
Environmental Laboratories
QUALITY CONTROL RESULTS
METHOD
TPH/gas
RECOVERY
83 %
METHOD
DETECTION LIMIT
1.0 ppm
ISNEDflB
REVIEWED BY
2500 Gate Way Centre Blvd.. Suite 300 • Morrisville, NO 27560
Telephone: [phone] • FAX: [phone]
GeoChem, Incorporated Bill To:
71
T'O- l^rK rrgc
. 0%. i ^ ^ C ^''10 /p
Environmental Laboratories
2500 Gate Way Centre Blvd., Suite 300
Morrisville, NO 27560
PROJECT SIT^ PC#
Ihi 147^0 'iy
NO . FOSRENIATNOC REPNOITACOL
L/ ANALYSES /
/ / / / / / /
/ / GeoChem PROJECT # .n o a-i / il
SITE NAME / / DATE REPORT DUE ,
COLLECTED BYCS/grtaft/re)/ / ./ VERBAL / FAX / HARDCOPY
FIELD
SAMPLE ID
TURNAROUND
IN DAYS
SAMPLE
MATRIX
DATE
COLLECTED
AN / LAB ID NO.
L REMARKS (for lab use onM
//4 - iA V'At /dfl95
///>'-??1 c A<. A1 1
it • IAL /A<¥ri
1 ■7/1 f Am
3
REMARKS RELINQUI
TME
TIME
f.ijl/
TIMEF^ECEIYED BY:
AJ ^ / fiA--
TIME RELINQUISHED BY:DATE TIME RECEIVED BY:DATE EUNQUISHED BY:DATE
F^ECEIVED BY:DATE TIME RELINQUISHED BY:DATE TIME RECEIVED BY:DATE RELINQUISHED BY:DATE TIME
T :haln of Custody Is considered a written contract to perfon i services requested In the analyses section of this documen
GeoChem, Incorporated
Environmental Laboratories
July 24, 1992
Mr. Martin Richmond
Richmond Environmental Services, Inc.
P.O. Box 5336
Raleigh, NC 27650
Reference: Holland BP Facility
GCI# 9207-013
Dear Mr. Martin Richmond:
This is the analytical report for the above referenced
project. On July 6, 1992 we received five water samples for
analysis. The analytical and quality control results are presented
in separate tables for your convenience. Brief summaries of
analytical methods employed are as follows.
EPA akOthod 602
Samples are loaded into a specially designed purging chamber
at ambient temperature. Helium is bubbled through the sample.
This drives the organics onto a sorbent trap. Once purging has
been completed the sorbent column is rapidly heated. This
efficiently transfers the organics into the gas chromatograph which
separates the components of the sample. The purgeable organics are
then detected using flame ionization and photo ionization
detectors.
2500 Gate Way Centre Blvd., Suite 300 • Morrisville, NC 27560
Telephone: [phone] • FAX: [phone]
GeoChem, Incorporated
Environmental Laboratories
PAH (EPA Method 610)
This method covers the determination of certain polynuclear
aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH). A measured volume of sample,
approximately one liter, is extracted with methylene chloride using
a separatory funnel or a continuous liquid to liquid extractor.
The methylene chloride extract is then analyzed by gas
chromatography using a flame ionization detector for compound
identification.
If there are any technical questions please feel free to call
me at 919-460-8093. Thank you for allowing ^oCbsm to serve your
analytical needs.
Since
President
2500 Gate Way Centre Blvd., Suite 300 • Mornsville, NO 27560
Telephone: 919-46GS093 • FAX: [phone]
GeoChem, Incorporated
Environmental Laboratories
Geochem (NC #336/SC #99008)
Project#9207-013 Site Name Holland BP
LAB ID.2980 2981 2982
DATE SAMPLED 7/06/92 7/06/92 7/06/92
FIELD ID.MW-1 MW-2 MW-3
KBTBOD
ANALYTE ua/1 pqi ua/1 pql uo/1 DQl
SPA 602
Benzene 2200 5.0 4.4 0.5 2.3 0.5
Toluene 960 3.6 1.3
Chlorobenzene BQL BDL BDL
Ethylbenzene 100 0.69 BDL
Xylenes 400 2.6 1.1
1,3 Dichlorobenzene BQL BDL BDL
1,4 Dichlorobenzene BQL BDL BDL
1,2 Dichlorobenzene BQL BDL BDL
MTBB 140 10 1.4 1.0 120 1.0
LAB ID.2983 2984
DATE SAMPLED 7/06/92 7/06/92
FIELD ID.MW-4 MW-5
METHOD
ANALYTE ua/1 .pql ua/1 pql
BPA 602
Benzene 1.5 0,5 BDL 0.5
Toluene 1.1 BDL
Chlorobenzene BDL BDL
Ethylbenzene BDL BDL
Xylenes 2.5 BDL
1,3 Dichlorobenzene BDL BDL
1,4 Dichlorobenzene BDL BDL
1,2 Dichlorobenzene BDL BDL
NTBB 5.3 1.0 11 1.0
soil water
parts per million « mg/kg mg/1
parts per billion » ^g/kg ug/1
pgl » practical guantitation limit due to matrix effects
bdl = below method detection limit,
bql « below guantitation limit.
2500 Gate Way Centre Blvd., Suite 300 • Morrisville, NC 27560
Telephone: [phone] • FAX: [phone]
GeoChem, Incorporated
Environmental Laboratories
QUALITY CONTROL RESULTS
METHOD
602
Benzene
Toluene
Chlorobenzene
Ethylbenzene
Xylenes
1.3-Dichlorobenzene
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
1.4-Dichlorobenzene
MTBE
RECOVERY
109 %
93 %
93 %
94 %
95 %
96 %
96 %
97 %
METHOD
DETECTION LIMIT
0.5 ppb
92 %1.0 ppb
610
Naphthalene
Acenaphthene
Phenanthrene
62 %
68 %
90 %
1.0 ppb
REVIEWED/B^
REVIEWED BY
2500 Qate Way Centre Blvd., Suite 300 • Morrisville, NC 27560
Telephone: 919-460B093 • FAX: [phone]
Report To:
/(t ^ <n^')
*/'iA i ^c^</'Cc i,
'y^X ^ T?■ 0.
aalc'6*I f^C
GeoChem, Incorporated /O
Bill To:
Environmental Laboratories
2500 Gate Way Centre Blvd., Suite 300
Morrisville, NO 27560
PROJECT SITE PC#
I'hu ^
ON .OFSRENIATNOC REPNOITACOL
/ / ANALYSES /
II !/M -/ / / / /hlr^ / / / /
/ / GeoChem PROJECT #//SITE NAME ^/ / DATE REPORT DUE ,! /COLLECTED Bi(Signature} /J / VERBAL / FAX / HARDCOPY
flELD
SAMPLE ID
TURNAROUND
IN DAYS
SAMPLE
MATRIX
DATE
COLLECTED n / LAB ID NO./ REMARKS /for /ah use on/v)
' t 1 X
jVy y* ■ 1 ^M8/
«-/ - T
A 'V ^\
- c
/•
REMARKS RELINQUISHED BY^ / /DATElUhx TIME
V-7J-
RECEIVED BY:tiiiik'im-DATE TIME
^;/o
RELINQUISHED BY:DATE TIME RECEIVED BY:4)AtE tin;E REUNQUISHED BY:DATE TIME
RECEIVED BY:PATE TIME RELINQUISHED BY:DATE TIME RECEIVED BY:DATE TIME RELINQUISHED BY:DATE TIME
T ihain of Custody Is considered a written contract to perfori i services requested In the analyses section of this documen
AnalytiKEM An American NuKEM Company
AnaiytlKEM Inc.
454 S. Anderson Road, BTC 532
Rock Hill. SC 29730
803/329-9690
TEST REPORT NO. A82722
October 9, 1992
Prepared for:
Richmond Environmental Services
2008 Hillsborough Street
Suite 10
Raleigh. NC 27605
Attention: Martin Richmond
Project: Wilson Wells/Holland BP Facility
Reviewed &
Approved by:
Name:origlio
Title: OA/QC Manager
AnalyZiKEM
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
I. Certification 1
II. Definition of Terms 2
III. Sample Designations 3
IV. Methodology 4
V. Analytical Results 5 -21
VI. Quality Control Data 22 - 25
Test Report No. A82722
Page 1
I. C^tiflcation
AnalytiHEM
AnalytiKEM, Inc.
Current Certifications/Regulatory Approvals
Tabulated below are the current laboratory certifications that are held by
each AnalytiKEM Laboratory. Analyses performed at multiple AnalytiKEM
locations will be noted in the test report.
Cherry Hill, NJ Rock Hill, SC Houston Analytical, TX
State Cert #State Cert #State Cert #
Arkansas *S. Carolina 46067 N. Dakota R-006
Connecticut PH-0715 N. Carolina 316 Oklahoma 8403
Florida 880985G New Jersey 79795 Texas Water Commission *
!iassachusetts NJ117 Louisiana 92-07
New Jersey 04012 S. Carolina 82011
New York 10815 N. Carolina 367
N. Carolina 258 Wisconsin 998010530
N. Dakota R-038 New Jersey 82869
Pennsylvania 68366
S. Carolina 94004
Tennessee 02908
Vermont *
Oklahoma 9107
* No certification numbers are issued for these states.
Test Report No. A82722
Page 2
II.Definition of Terms An&lytiiKED/l
Term Definition
D Detected; result must be greater than zero.
DI Deionized Water
J Compound was detected at levels below the practical
quantitation limit. The level reported is approximate.
MS/MSD Matrix Spike/Matrix Spike Duplicate.
NA Analysis not applicable to the sample matrix.
ND Not Detected
NR Not Requested
NTU Nephelometric Turbidity Units
RPD Relative Percent Difference
RSD Relative Standard Deviation
U Compound was analyzed for but not detected. The preceding number
is the practical quantitation limit for the compound.
ppb Parts-per-billion; may be converted to ppm by dividing by 1,000.
ppm Parts-per-million; may be converted to ppb by multiplying by
1,000.
ug/1 Micrograms of constituent per liter of sample; equivalent to
parts-per-billion.
^g/^S Micrograms of constituent per kilogram of sample; equivalent to
parts-per-billion.
^g/^S dw Micrograms of constituent per kilogram of sample reported on a
dry weight basis.
COG Calibration Check Compound; used to verify the precision of a
GC/MS calibration curve.
SPCC System Performance Check Compound; used to verify the correct
operation of a GC/MS instrument.
PQL Practical Quantitation Limit; the minimum level at which
compounds can be dependably quantitated.
B Analyte detected in associated blank as well as the sample.
It indicates possible/probable blank contamination.
Test Report No. A82722
Page 3
III. Sample Designations AnalyriKEM
AnalytiKEM Client Date
Deslenation Designation Matrix Sampled
A82722-1 MW-1 Aqueous 9/24/92
A82722-2 m-2 Aqueous 9/24/92
A82722-3 MW-3 Aqueous 9/24/92
A82722-4 MW-4 Aqueous 9/24/92
A82722-5 MW-5 Aqueous 9/24/92
A82722-6 MW-6 Aqueous 9/24/92
A82722-7 DW-1 Aqueous 9/24/92
Note: Samples will be held for 30 days beyond the test report date unless
otherwise requested.
Test Report No. A82722
Page 4
IV. MethodoioRY AnalyZiKEM
Semivolatiles
Method 3510, Separatorv Funnel Liauid-Liauld Extraction. Test Methods for
Evaluating Solid Waste, Physical Chemical Methods, SW846, Third Edition,
USEPA, 1986, with all promulgated revisions.
Method 8270, Gas Chromatographv/Mass Spectrometrv for Semivolatile Organics
Capillary Colijmn Technique. Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste,
Physical/Chemical Methods, SW846, Third Edition, USEPA, 1986, with all
promulgated revisions.
General Chromatographv
Purgeable Halocarbons
Method 5030, Puree and Trap. Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste,
Physical/Chemical Methods, SW846, Third Edition, USEPA, 1986, with all
promulgated revisions.
Method 8010, Halogenated Volatile Organics. Test Methods for Evaluating Solid
Waste, Physical/Chemical Methods, SW846, Third Edition, USEPA, 1986, with all
promulgated revisions.
Purgeable Aromatics
Method 5030, Purge and Trap. Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste,
Physical/Chemical Methods, SW846, Third Edition, USEPA, 1986, with all
promulgated revisions.
Method 8020, Aromatic Volatile Organics. Test Methods for Evaluating Solid
Waste, Physical/Chemical Methods, SW846, Third Edition, USEPA, 1986, with all
promulgated revisions.
V.
Test Report No. A82722
Page 5
Analytical Results
Semlvolatlle Organlcs CPaee 1 of 2^
Sample Designation
Method A82722-1
Parameter Blank 1 MW-1
N-Nitrosodimethylamine 5.0 U 10 u
Phenol 5.0 U 5.9 J
Bis(2-chloroethyl) Ether 5.0 u 10 u
2-Chlorophenol 5.0 u 10 u
1,3-Dichlorobenzene 5.0 u 10 u
1,4-Dichlorobenzene 5.0 u 10 u
Benzyl Alcohol 5.0 u 10 u
1,2-Dichlorobenzene 5.0 u 10 u
2-Me thyIpheno1 5.0 u 10 u
Bis(2-chloroisopropyl) Ether 5.0 u 10 u
4-Me thyIpheno1 5.0 u 10 u
N-Nitrosodipropylamine 5.0 u 10 u
Hexachloroethane 5.0 u 10 u
Nitrobenzene 5.0 u 10 u
Isophorone 5.0 u 10 u
2-Nitrophenol 5.0 u 10 u
2,4-D ime thyIpheno1 5.0 u 10 u
Benzole Acid 25 u 5.5 J
Bis(2 -chloroethoxy)methane 5.0 u 10 u
2,4-Dichlorophenol 5.0 u 10 u
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 5.0 u 10 u
Naphthalene 5.0 u 10 u
Hexachlorobutadiene 5.0 u 10 u
4-Chloro-3-methylphenol 5.0 u 10 u
2-Me thyInaphthalene 5.0 u 10 u
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene 5.0 u 10 u
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol 5.0 u 10 u
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol 25 u 50 u
2-Chloronaphthalene 5.0 u 10 u
2-Nitroaniline 25 u 50 u
Dimethyl Phthalate 5.0 u 10 u
Acenaphthylene 5.0 u 10 u
3-Nitroaniline 25 u 50 u
Acenaphthene 5.0 u 10 u
2,4-Dinitrophenol 25 u 50 u
Units (ug/1)(ug/1)
AnaiytiKEM
Test Report No. A82722
Page 6
V. Analytical Results fCont^d^
Semlvolatile Organlcs (Page 2 of 2)
AnalytiKElVt
Sample Designation
Method A82722-1
Parameter Blank I Mtf-1
4-Nitrophenol 25 U 50 U
D ibenz o furan 5.0 U 10 u
2,4-Dinitrotoluene 5.0 u 10 u
2,6-Dinitrotoluene 5.0 u 10 u
Diethyl Phthalate 5.0 u 10 u
4-Chlorophenyl Phenyl Ether 5.0 u 10 u
Fluorene 5.0 u 10 u
4-Nitroaniline 25 u 50 u
4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol 25 u 50 u
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine 5.0 u 10 u
4-Bromophenyl Phenyl Ether 5.0 u 10 u
Hexachlorobenzene 5.0 u 10 U
Pentachlorophenol 5.0 u 10 u
Phenanthrene 5.0 u 10 u
Anthracene 5.0 u 10 u
Dibutyl Phthalate 2.0 J 5.6 J
Fluoranthene 5.0 u 10 u
Benzidine 25 u 50 u
Pyrene 5.0 u 10 u
Butylbenzyl Phthalate 16 24
3,3' -Dichlorobenzldine 10 U n 20 u
Benz 0(a)anthrac ene 5,0 u 10 u
Bis(2-ethyIhexy1) Phthalate 1.7 J 6.9 J
Chrysene 5.0 u 10 u
Dioctyl Phthalate 5.0 u 10 u
Benzo(b)fluoranthene 5.0 u 10 u
Benzo(k)fluoranthene 5.0 u 10 u
Benzo(a)pyrene 5.0 u 10 u
Indeno(l,2,3-cd)pyrene 5.0 u 10 u
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene 5.0 u 10 u
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene 5.0 u 10 u
Units (ug/1)(ug/1)
Test Report No. A82722
Page 7
V. Analytical Results (ContM)
Semlvolatile Oreanics CPage 1 of 2^
Method
Sample Designation
A82722-2
AnalytiKE/Vi
A82722-3
Parameter Blank 2 MW-2 MW-3
N-Nitrosodimethylamine 5.0 U 10 u 10 u
Phenol 5.0 U 10 u 10 u
Bis(2-chloroethyl) Ether 5.0 u 10 u 10 u
2-Chlorophenol 5.0 u 10 u 10 u
1,3-Dichlorobenzene 5.0 u 10 u 10 u
1,4-Dichlorobenzene 5.0 u 10 u 10 u
Benzyl Alcohol 5.0 u 10 u 10 u
1,2-Dichlorobenzene 5.0 u 10 u 10 u
2-Me thyIphenol 5.0 u 10 u 10 u
Bis(2-chloroisopropyl) Ether 5.0 u 10 u 10 u
4-Methylphenol 5.0 u 10 u 10 u
N-Nitrosodipropylaniine 5.0 u 10 u 10 u
Hexachloroethane 5.0 u 10 u 10 u
Nitrobenzene 5.0 u 10 u 10 u
Isophorone 5.0 u 10 u 10 u
2-Nitrophenol 5.0 u 10 u 10 u
2,4-Dimethylphenol 5.0 u 10 u 10 u
Benzole Acid 25 u 50 u 50 u
B is(2-chlo r0 e thoxy)me thane 5.0 u 10 u 10 u
2,4-Dichlorophenol 5.0 u 10 u 10 u
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 5.0 u 10 u 10 u
Naphthalene 5.0 u 10 u 10 u
Hexachlorobutadiene 5.0 u 10 u 10 u
4-Chloro-3-methylphenol 5.0 u 10 u 10 u
2-Methylnaphthalene 5.0 u 10 u 10 u
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene 5.0 u 10 u 10 u
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol 5.0 u 10 u 10 u
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol 25 u 50 u 50 u
2-Chloronaphthalene 5.0 u 10 u 10 u
2-Nitroaniline 25 u 50 u 50 u
Dimethyl Phthalate 5.0 u 10 u 10 u
Acenaphthylene 5.0 u 10 u 10 u
3-Nitroaniline 25 u 50 u 50 u
Acenaphthene 5.0 u 10 u 10 u
2,4-Dinitrophenol 25 u 50 u 50 u
Units (ug/1)(ug/1)(ug/1)
V.
Test Report No. A82722
Page 8
Analytical Results (Cont^^
Semivolatile Oreanlcs (Page 2 of 21
AnalyZiKEM
Sample Designation
Method A82722-2 A82722-3
Parameter Blank 2 MW-2 MW-3
4-Nitrophenol 25 U 50 U 50 u
Dlbenzofuran 5.0 u 10 U 10 u
2,4-Dinitrotoluene 5.0 u 10 U 10 u
2,6-Dinitrotoluene 5.0 u 10 U 10 u
Dlethyl Phthalate 5.0 u 10 u 10 u
4-Chlorophenyl Phenyl Ether 5.0 u 10 u 10 u
Fluorene 5.0 u 10 u 10 u
4-Nitroaniline 25 u 50 u 50 u
4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol 25 u 50 u 50 u
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine 5.0 u 10 u 10 u
4-Bromophenyl Phenyl Ether 5.0 u 10 u 10 u
Hexachlorobenzene 5.0 u 10 u 10 u
Pentachlorophenol 5.0 u 10 u 10 u
Phenanthrene 5.0 u 10 u 10 u
Anthracene 5.0 u 10 u 10 u
Dibutyl Phthalate 11 25 16
Fluoranthene 5.0 u 10 u 10 u
Benzidine 25 u 50 u 50 u
Pyrene 5.0 u 10 u 10 u
Butylbenzyl Phthalate 5.0 u 10 u 10 u
3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine 10 u 20 u 20 u
Benzo(a)anthracene 5.0 u 10 u 10 u
Bis(2-ethylhexyl) Phthalate 8.7 2.0 J 2.6 J
Chrysene 5.0 u 10 u 10 u
Dioctyl Phthalate 5.0 u 10 u 10 u
Benzo(b)fluoranthene 5.0 u 10 u 10 u
Benzo(k)fluoranthene 5.0 u 10 u 10 u
Benzo(a)pyrene 5.0 u 10 u 10 u
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 5.0 u 10 u 10 u
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene 5.0 u 10 u 10 u
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene 5.0 u 10 u 10 u
Units (ug/1)(ug/1)(ug/1)
V.
Test Report No. A82722
Page 9
Analytical Results (ContM)
Semivolatlle Oreanlcs (Pace 1 of 2^
AnalytiKEHf
Method
Sample Desl2nation
A82722-4 A82722-5
Parameter Blank 2 Mff-4 MW-5
N-Nitrosodimethylamlne 5.0 U 10 u 10 u
Phenol 5.0 u 10 u 10 u
Bis(2-chloroethyl) Ether 5.0 u 10 u 10 u
2-Chlorophenol 5.0 u 10 u 10 u
1,3-Dichlorobenzene 5.0 u 10 u 10 u
1,4-Dichloroben2ene 5.0 u 10 u 10 u
Benzyl Alcohol 5.0 u 10 u 7.8 J
1,2-Dichlorobenzene 5.0 u 10 u 10 u
2-Methylphenol 5.0 u 10 u 10 u
Bis(2-chloroisopropyl) Ether 5.0 u 10 u 10 u
4-Methylphenol 5.0 u 10 u 10 u
N-Nltrosodlpropylamlne 5.0 u 10 u 10 u
Hexachloroethane 5.0 u 10 u 10 u
Nitrobenzene 5.0 u 10 u 10 u
Isophorone 5.0 u 10 u 10 u
2-Nitrophenol 5.0 u 10 u 10 u
2,4-Dimethylphenol 5.0 u 10 u 10 u
Benzole Acid 25 u 50 u 50 u
Bls(2-chloroethoxy)methane 5.0 u 10 u 10 u
2,4-Dichlorophenol 5.0 u 10 u 10 u
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 5.0 u 10 u 10 u
Naphthalene 5.0 u 10 u 10 u
Hexachlorobutadiene 5.0 u 10 u 10 u
4-Chloro-3-methylphenol 5.0 u 10 u 10 u
2-Methylnaphthalene 5.0 u 10 u 10 u
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene 5.0 u 10 u 10 u
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol 5.0 u 10 u 10 u
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol 25 u 50 u 50 u
2-Chloronaphthalene 5.0 u 10 u 10 u
2-Nltroaniline 25 u 50 u 50 u
Dimethyl Phthalate 5.0 u 10 u 10 u
Acenaphthylene 5.0 u 10 u 10 u
3-Nitroaniline 25 u 50 u 50 u
Acenaphthene 5.0 u 10 u 10 u
2,4-Dinitrophenol 25 u 50 u 50 u
Units (ug/1)(ug/1)(ug/1)
V.
Test Report No. A82722
Page 10
Analytical Results (Cont'd^
Semtvolatile Organlcs CPage 2 of 2)
AnalyZiKEM
Sample Designation
Method A82722-4 A82722-5
Parameter Blank 2 MW-4 MW-5
4-Nitrophenol 25 U 50 U 50 u
Dlbenzofuran 5.0 U 10 U 10 u
2,4-Dinitrotoluene 5.0 U 10 U 10 u
2,6-Dinltrotoluene 5.0 U 10 U 10 u
Diethyl Phthalate 5.0 U 10 u 10 u
4-Chlorophenyl Fhenyl Ether 5.0 u 10 u 10 u
Fluorene 5.0 u 10 u 10 u
4-Nitroanlltne 25 u 50 u 50 u
4,6-Dinltro-2-methylphenol 25 u 50 u 50 u
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine 5.0 u 10 u 10 u
4-Bromophenyl Fhenyl Ether 5.0 u 10 u 10 u
Hexachlorobenzene 5.0 u 10 u 10 u
Pentachlorophenol 5.0 u 10 u 10 u
Fhenanthrene 5,0 u 10 u 10 u
Anthracene 5.0 u 10 u 10 u
Dibutyl Phthalate 11 14 6.2 J
Fluoranthene 5.0 u 10 u 10 u
Benzidine 25 u 50 u 50 u
Fyrene 5.0 u 10 u 10 u
Butylbenzyl Phthalate 5.0 u 10 u 36
3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine 10 u 20 u 20 u
Benz o(a)anthrac ene 5.0 u 10 u 10 u
Bis(2-ethylhexyl) Phthalate 8.7 3.0 J 9.2 J
Chrysene 5.0 u 10 u 10 u
Dioctyl Phthalate 5.0 u 10 u 10 u
Benzo(b)fluoranthene 5.0 u 10 u 10 u
Benzo(k)fluoranthene 5.0 u 10 u 10 u
Benzo(a)pyrene 5,0 u 10 u 10 u
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 5.0 u 10 u 10 u
Dlbenzo(a,h)anthracene 5.0 u 10 u 10 u
Benzo(g,h,l)perylene 5.0 u 10 u 10 u
Units (ug/1)(ug/1)(ug/1)
V.
Test Report No. A82722
Page 11
Analytical Results ^Cont'd)
Semlvolatlle Organlcs (Page 1 of 2)
AnalytiKEM
Method
Sample Designation
A82722-6 A82722-7
Parameter Blank 2 Mtf-6 DW-1
N-Nitrosodimethylamine 5.0 U 10 U 10 u
Phenol 5.0 U 14 10 u
Bis(2-chloroethyl) Ether 5.0 U 10 u 10 u
2 -Chlorophenol 5.0 U 10 u 10 u
1,3-Dichlorobenzene 5.0 u 10 u 10 u
1,4-Dichlorobenzene 5.0 u 10 u 10 u
Benzyl Alcohol 5.0 u 8.9 J 11
1,2-Dichlorobenzene 5.0 u 10 U 10 u
2-Methylphenol 5.0 u 3.1 J 10 u
Bis(2-chloroisopropyl) Ether 5.0 u 10 U 10 u
4-Methylphenol 5.0 u 4.2 J 10 u
N-Nitrosodipropylamine 5.0 u 10 u 10 u
Hexachloroethane 5.0 u 10 u 10 u
Nitrobenzene 5.0 u 10 u 10 u
Isophorone 5.0 u 10 u 10 u
2-Nitrophenol 5.0 u 10 u 10 u
2,4-Dimethylphenol 5.0 u 10 u 10 u
Benzole Acid 25 u 50 u 50 U
Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane 5.0 u 10 u 10 u
2,4-Dichlorophenol 5.0 u 10 u 10 u
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 5.0 u 10 u 10 u
Naphthalene 5.0 u 12 10 u
Hexachlorobutadiene 5.0 u 10 u 10 u
4-Chlo ro- 3-me thyIpheno1 5.0 u 10 u 10 u
2-MethyInaphthalene 5.0 u 2.3 J 10 u
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene 5.0 u 10 u 10 u
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol 5.0 u 10 u 10 u
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol 25 u 50 u 50 U
2-Chloronaphthalene 5.0 u 10 u 10 u
2-Nitroaniline 25 u 50 u 50 U
Dimethyl Fhthalate 5.0 u 10 u 10 u
Acenaphthylene 5.0 u 10 u 10 u
3-Nitroaniline 25 u 50 u 50 U
Acenaphthene 5.0 u 10 u 10 u
2,4-Dinitrophenol 25 u 50 u 50 U
Units (ug/1)(ug/1)(ug/1)
Test Report No. A82722
Page 12
V. Analytical Results (Cont'd')
Semlvolatlle Organics (Page 2 of 2)
AnalyZiKEM
Sample Designation
Method A82722-6 A82722-7
Parameter Blank 2 Mff-6 DW-1
4-Nitrophenol 25 U 50 u 50 U
Dibenzofuran 5.0 U 10 u 10 u
2,4-Dinitrotoluene 5.0 u 10 u 10 u
2,6-Dinitrotoluene 5.0 u 10 u 10 u
Diethyl Phthalate 5.0 u 10 u 10 u
4-Chlorophenyl Phenyl Ether 5.0 u 10 u 10 u
Fluorene 5.0 u 10 u 10 u
4-Nitroaniline 25 u 50 u 50 u
4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol 25 u 50 u 50 u
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine 5.0 u 10 u 10 u
4-Bromophenyl Phenyl Ether 5.0 u 10 u 10 u
Hexachlorobenzene 5.0 u 10 u 10 u
Pentachlorophenol 5.0 u 10 u 10 u
Phenanthrene 5.0 u 10 u 10 u
Anthracene 5.0 u 10 u 10 u
Dibutyl Phthalate 11 6.1 J 6.4 J
Fluoranthene 5.0 u 10 u 10 u
Benzidine 25 u 50 u 50 u
Pyrene 5.0 u 10 u 10 u
Butylbenzyl Phthalate 5.0 u 38 54
3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine 10 u 20 u 20 u
Benzo(a)anthracene 5.0 u 10 u 10 u
Bis(2-ethylhexyl) Phthalate 8.7 5.2 J 8.9 J
Chrysene 5.0 u 10 u 10 u
Dioctyl Phthalate 5.0 u 10 u 10 u
Benzo(b)fluoranthene 5,0 u 10 u 10 u
Benzo(k)fluoranthene 5.0 u 10 u 10 u
Benz 0(a)pyrene 5.0 u 10 u 10 u
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 5.0 u 10 u 10 u
D ib enz o(a,h)anthracene 5.0 u 10 u 10 u
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene 5.0 u 10 u 10 u
Units (ug/1)(ug/1)(ug/1)
Test Report No. A82722
Page 13
V. Analytical Results (Cont'd)
EPA/NIH/NBS Nontargetted Library Search
No nontargetted compounds were detected in the following samples:
Method Blank 1
AnalyZiKEM
AnalytlKEM Designation Method Blank 2
CAS Number Compound Name Fraction
Scan
Number
Estimated
Concentration
(ug/1)
Unknown Compound BNA 2539 20
Unknown Compound BNA 3177 4.0
Unknown Compound BNA 3328 670
Unknown Compound BNA 3444 8.0
Unknown Compound BNA 3570 6.0
Unknown Compound BNA 4347 6.0
Note: Estimated concentration is calculated against the nearest eluting internal
standard.
V.
Test Report No. A82722
Page 14
Analytical Results (Cont'd")
EPA/NIH/NBS Nontargetted Library Search
/KnalytiKEM
AnalytiKEM Designation A82722'l
Client Designation MW-1
CAS Number Compound Name Fraction
Scan
Number
Estimated
Concentration
(ug/1)
Unknovm Alkylated Benzene BNA 265 17
Unknown Alkylated Benzene BNA 285 22
Unknown Compound BNA 473 20
Unknown Compound BNA 560 11
Unknown Compound BNA 653 8.0
Unknown Compound BNA 740 36
Unknown Compound BNA 905 20
Unknown Compound BNA 1003 100
Unknown Compound BNA 1045 91
Unknown Compound BNA 1099 12
Unknown Compound BNA .1307 13
Unknown Compound BNA 1430 12
Unknown Compound BNA 2450 9.0
57103 Hexadecanoic Acid BNA 2688 19
10544500 Sulfur BNA 2819 21
Unknown Compound BNA 3359 150
Unknown Compound BNA 3442 29
Unknown Compound BNA 3808 65
Note: Estimated concentration is calculated
standard.
against the nearest eluting internal
Test Report No. A82722
Page 15
V. Analytical Results (Cont'd)
EFA/NIH/NBS Nontareetted Library Search
AnalytiKEIVI
AnalytlKEM Designation A82722-2
Client Designation MW-2
CAS Number Compound Name Fraction
Scan
Number
Estimated
Concentration
(ug/1)
Unknown Compound BNA 715 8.0
Unknown Compound BNA 2805 10
Unknown Compound BNA 2924 240
Unknown Compound BNA 3032 15
AnalytlKEM Designation A82722-3
Client Desienation MU-3
CAS Number Compound Name Fraction
Scan
Number
Estimated
Concentration
(ug/1)
Unknown Compound BNA 2921 370
AnalytlKEM Desienation AS2722-4
Client Desienation MW-4
CAS Number Compound Name Fraction
Scan
Number
Estimated
Concentration
(ug/1)
Unknown Compound BNA 573 18
Unknown Compound BNA 2925 560
Note: Estimated concentration is calculated against the nearest eluting internal
standard.
Test Report No. A82722
Fage 16
V. Analytical Results CCont'd)
EPA/NIH/NBS Nontargetted Library Search
AnalyZiKEM
AnalytlKEM Designation A82722-5
Client Designation MW-5
CAS Number Compound Name Fraction
Scan
Number
Estimated
Concentration
(ug/1)
Unknown Compound BNA 209 16
Unknown Compound BNA 421 35
Unknown Compound SNA 575 10
Unknown Compound BNA 850 16
Unknown Compound BNA 2250 27
Unknown Compound BNA 2929 860
Unknown Compound BNA 3031 8.0
Unknown Compound BNA 3376 8.0
AnalytlKEM Designation A82722-6
Client Designation MW-6
CAS Number Compound Name Fraction
Scan
Number
Estimated
Concentration
(ug/1)
Unknown Benzene BNA 277 44
Dimethylbenzene Isomer BNA 297 110
D ime thyIbenz ene Is omer BNA 356 45
Unknown Compound BNA 418 49
Ethylmethylbenzene Isomer BNA 536 27
EthyIme thylb enz ene Is omer BNA 552 10
EthyIme thyIbenz ene Is ome r BNA 580 9.0
EthyIme thylb enz ene Is omer BNA 685 12
Ethylmethylbenzene Isomer BNA 714 11
Unknown Compound BNA 2242 9.0
Unknown Compound BNA 2923 710
Unknown Compound BNA 3028 12
Note: Estimated concentration is calculated against the nearest eluting internal
standard.
Test Report No. A82722
Page 17
V. Analytical Results (Cont'd^
EPA/NIH/NBS Nontargetted Library Search
AnalytiKEM
AnalytlKEM Designation A82722-7
Client Designation DW-1
CAS Number Compound Name Fraction
Scan
Number
Estimated
Concentration
(ug/1)
Unknown Compound BNA 419 58
Unknown Compound BNA 846 17
Unknown Compound BNA 2924 970
Unknown Compound BNA 3029 9.0
Note: Estimated concentration is calculated against the nearest eluting internal
standard.
Test Report No. A82722
Page 18
V. Analytical Results fCont'd")
General Chromatography
AnalytiKE/VI
Sample Designation
Method A82722-1 A82722
Parameter Blank 1 MW-1 Mff-3
Chloromethane 3.0 U 30 U 3.0 U
Bromomethane 1.0 U 10 u 1.0 U
Vinyl Chloride 1.0 u 10 u 1.0 u
D1chlo ro dlfluo rome thane 1.0 u 10 u 1.0 u
Chloroethane 3.0 U 30 U 3,0 U
Methylene Chloride 2.0 U 20 U 2.0 U
Trichlorofluoromethane 1.0 U 10 U 1.0 u
1,1-Dichloroe thene 1.0 u 10 U 1.0 u
1,1-Dichloroethane 1.0 u 10 u 1.0 u
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 1,0 u 10 u 1.0 u
Chloroform 1.0 u 10 u 1.0 u
1,2-Dichloroethane 1.0 u 10 u 1.0 u
1,1,1-Trichloroethane 1.0 u 10 u 1.0 u
Carbon Tetrachloride 1.0 u 10 u 1.0 u
Bromodichloromethane 1.0 u 10 u 1.0 u
1,2-Dichloropropane 1.0 u 10 u 1.0 u
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 1.0 u 10 u 1.0 u
Trichloroethene 1.0 u 10 u 1.0 u
1,1,2-Trichloroethane 1.0 u 10 u 1.0 u
Dibromoch1oromethane 1.0 u 10 u 1.0 u
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 1.0 u 10 u 1.0 u
2-Chloroethylvinyl Ether 1.0 u 10 u 1.0 u
Bromoform 1.0 u 10 u 1.0 u
Tetrachloroethene 1.0 u 10 u 1.0 u
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 1.0 u 10 u 1.0 u
Methyl tert-Butyl Ether (MTBE)2.0 U 190 77 *
Benzene 1.0 u 310 1.0 u
Toluene 1.0 u 21 1.0 u
Chlorobenzene 1.0 u 10 u 1.0 u
Ethylbenzene 1.0 u 10 u 1.0 u
m-Xylene 1.0 u 13 1.0 u
o,p-Xylene 1.0 u 26 1.0 u
m-Dichlorobenzene 1.0 u 10 U 1.0 u
o-Dichlorobenzene 1.0 u 10 U 1.0 u
p-Dichlorobenzene 1.0 u 10 u 1,0 u
Units <Ug/l)(ug/l)(ug/l)
* Outside linear range; not enough sample to rerun.
Note: All compounds reported at levels exceeding the PQL have been confirmed
by alternate column GC.
Test Report No. A82722
Page 19
V. Analytical Results (Cont'd^
General Chromatographv
AnalytiKEM
Sample Designation
Method A82722-4 A82722
Parameter Blank 1 Mtf-4 MU-5
Chloromethane 3.0 U 3.0 U 3.0 U
Bromomethane 1.0 u 1.0 U 1.0 U
Vinyl Chloride 1.0 u 1.0 u 1.0 u
Dichlorodifluoromethane 1.0 u 1.0 u 1.0 u
Chloroethane 3.0 U 3.0 U 3.0 U
Methylene Chloride 2.0 U 2.0 U 2.0 U
Trichlorofluoromethane 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U
1,1-Dichloroethene 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U
1,1-Dichloroethane 1.0 u 1.0 U 1.0 u
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 1.0 U 1.0 u 1.0 u
Chloroform 1.0 u 1.0 u 1.0 u
1,2 -Dichloroethane 1.0 u 1.0 u 1.0 u
1,1,l-Trichloroethane 1.0 u 1.0 u 1.0 u
Carbon Tetrachlorlde 1.0 u 1.0 u 1.0 u
Bromodichloromethane 1.0 u 1.0 U 1.0 u
1,2-Dlchloropropane 1.0 u 1.0 u 1.0 u
cls-1,3-Dichloropropene 1.0 u 1.0 u 1.0 u
Trichloroethene 1.0 u 1.0 U 1.0 u
1,1,2-Trichloroethane 1.0 u 1.0 u 1.0 u
Dibromochloromethane 1.0 u 1.0 u 1.0 u
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 1.0 u 1.0 u 1.0 u
2-Chloroethylvinyl Ether 1.0 u 1.0 u 1.0 u
Bromoform 1.0 u 1.0 u 1.0 u
Tetrachloroethene 1.0 u 1.0 u 1.0 u
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 1.0 u 1.0 u 1.0 u
Methyl tert-Butyl Ether (MTBE)2.0 U 42 *42
Benzene 1.0 u 1.0 u 1.0 u
Toluene 1.0 u 1.0 u 1.0 u
Chlorobenzene 1.0 u 1.0 u 1.0 u
Ethylbenzene 1.0 u 1.0 u 1.0 u
m-Xylene 1.0 u 1.0 u 1.0 u
o,p-Xylene 1.0 u 1.0 u 1.0 u
m-Dichlorobenzene 1.0 u 1.0 u 1.0 u
o-Dichlorobenzene 1.0 u 1.0 u 1.0 u
p-Dichlorobenzene 1.0 u 1.0 u 1.0 u
Units (ug/1)(ug/1)(ug/1)
* Not enough sample to confirm by alternate column.
Note: All compounds reported at levels exceeding the PQL have been confirmed
by alternate coltimn GC.
V.
Test Report No. A82722
Page 20
Analytical Results (Cont^d^
General Chromatographv
AnalytiKEfVI
Sample Designation
Method A82722-6 A82722
Blank 1 MU-6 DW-1
3.0 U 30 U 3.0 U
1.0 U 10 U 1.0 U
1.0 U 10 U 1.0 U
1.0 U 10 U 1.0 U
3.0 U 30 U 3.0 U
2.0 U 20 U 2.0 U
1.0 U 10 U 1.0 U
1.0 U 10 U 1.0 U
1.0 U 10 U 1.0 U
1.0 U 10 U 1.0 U
1.0 U 10 U 1.0 U
1.0 u 10 u 1.0 U
1.0 u 10 u 1.0 U
1.0 u 10 u 1.0 u
1.0 u 10 u 1.0 U
1.0 u 10 u 1.0 u
1.0 u 10 u 1.0 u
1.0 u 10 u 1.0 u
1.0 u 10 u 1.0 u
1.0 u 10 u 1.0 u
1.0 u 10 u 1.0 u
1.0 u 10 u 1.0 u
1.0 U 10 u 1.0 U
1.0 u 10 u 1.0 u
1.0 u 10 u 1.0 u
2.0 U 690 *2.0 U
1.0 u 480 1.0 u
1.0 u 200 1.0 u
1.0 u 10 U 1.0 u
1.0 u 66 1.0 u
1.0 u 97 1.0 u
1,0 u 120 1.0 u
1.0 u 10 U 1.0 u
1.0 u 10 U 1.0 u
1.0 u 10 U 1.0 U
(ug/1)(ug/1)(ug/1)
Parameter
Chloromethane
Bromomethane
Vinyl Chloride
Dlchlorodifluoromethane
Chloroethane
Methylene Chloride
Trichlorofluoromethane
1,1-Dichloroethene
1.1-Dichloroethane
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
Chloroform
1.2-Dichloroethane
1.1.1-Trichloroethane
Carbon Tetrachloride
Bromodichloromethane
1,2-Dichloropropane
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
Trichloroethene
1.1.2-Trichloroethane
Dibromochloromethane
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
2-Chloroethylvinyl Ether
Bromoform
Tetrachloroethene
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
Methyl tert-Butyl Ether (MTBE)
Benzene
Toluene
Chlorobenzene
Ethylbenzene
m-Xylene
o,p-Xylene
m-Dichlorobenzene
o-Dichlorobenzene
p-Dichlorobenzene
Units
* Outside linear range; not enough sample to rerun.
Note: All compounds reported at levels exceeding the PQL have been confirmed
by alternate column GC.
V.
Test Report No. A82722
Page 21
Analytical Results (Cont'd)
General Chromatographv
Sample Designation
Method A82722-2
Parameter Blank 2 Htf-2
Chi0 rome thane 3.0 U 3.0 U
Bromome thane 1.0 U 1.0 u
Vinyl Chloride 1.0 U 1.0 u
Dlchlorodlfluoromethane 1.0 U 1.0 u
Chloroethane 3.0 U 3.0 U
Methylene Chloride 2.0 U 2.0 U
Trlchlorofluoromethane 1.0 U 1.0 U
1,1-Dichloroethene 1.0 U 1.0 u
1,1-Dlchloroethane 1.0 U 1.0 u
trans-1,2-Dlchloroethene 1.0 U 1.0 u
Chloroform 1.0 U 1.0 u
1,2-Dlchloroethane 1.0 U 1.0 u
1,1,1-Trichloroethane 1.0 U 1.0 u
Carbon Tetrachloride 1.0 u 1.0 u
Bromodichloromethane 1.0 u 1.0 u
1,2-Dichloropropane 1.0 u 1.0 u
cls-l,3-Dichloropropene 1.0 u 1.0 u
Trlchloroethene 1.0 u 1.0 u
1,1,2-Trichloroethane 1.0 u 1.0 u
Dlbromochloromethane 1.0 u 1.0 u
trans -1,3-Dichloropropene 1.0 u 1.0 u
2-Chloroethylvinyl Ether 1.0 u 1.0 u
Bromoform 1.0 u 1.0 u
Tetrachloroethene 1.0 u 1.0 u
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 1.0 u 1.0 u
Methyl tert-Butyl Ether (MTBE)2.0 U 3.4
Benzene 1.0 u 1.0 u
Toluene 1.0 u 1.0 u
Chlorobenzene 1.0 u 1.0 u
Ethylbenzene 1.0 u 1.0 u
m-Xylene 1.0 u 1.0 u
o,p-Xylene 1.0 u 1.0 u
m-Dichlorobenzene 1.0 u 1.0 u
o-Dichlorobenzene 1.0 u 1.0 u
p-Dichlorobenzene 1.0 u 1.0 u
Units (ug/1)(ug/1)
AnalytiKED/l
Note: All compounds reported at levels exceeding the PQL have been confirmed
by alternate column GC.
VI.
Test Report No. A82722
Page 22
Quality Control Data
Semlvolatlle Organics
Aqueous Matrix Spike/Matrix Spike Duplicate Recovery Data
AnalytiKEM
Sample Spiked A82714-9
Amount Recovery
Control Limits
Hax.
Parameter of Soike MS MSD RPD Recovery RPD
1,4-Dichlorobenzene 50 55 52 6 10-110 15
N-Nitrosodipropylamine 50 60 60 0 10-151 27
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 50 58 57 2 20-136 24
Acenaphthene 50 65 68 4 17-120 5
2,4-Dinitrotoluene 50 54 55 2 10-175 17
Pyrene 50 100 102 2 10-175 19
Phenol 100 27 24 12 10-130 18
2-Chlorophenol 100 51 53 4 47-106 164-Chloro- 3-me thylphenol 100 71 70 1 48-115 30
4-Nitrophenol 100 14 12 15 10-175 30
Pentachlorophenol 100 35 40 13 64-118 11
Units (ppb)(%)(%)(%)(%)(%)
Recovery: 0 out of 22 outside control limits
1 out of 11 outside control limits
Test Report No. A82722
Page 23
VI. Quality Control Data fContM')
Semlvolatile Ortzanlcs
Aqueous Surrogate Recovery Data
AnalytiHEf^
Surrogate Recovery
Sample
Designation
Method Blank 1
Method Blank 2
A82714-9 Spike
A82714-9 Spike Dup.
A82722-1
A82722-2
A82722-3
A82722-4
A82722-5
A82722-6
A82722-7
Units
Control Limits
2-Fluorophenol
ClOO ppb Added)
30
20
30
28
39
35
30
27
26
24
34
(%)
10-90
Phenol-d5
goo ppb Added^
25
18
25
23
29
27
23
21
18
18
24
C%)
10-90
2,4,6-Tribromophenol
goo ppb Added^
51
28
69
73
73
50
45
38
43
22
52
(%)
10-142
Sample
Designation
Method Blank 1
Method Blank 2
A82714-9 Spike
A82714-9 Spike Dup.
A82722-1
A82722-2
A82722-3
A82722-4
A82722-5
A82722-6
A82722-7
Units
Control Limits
Nitrobenz ene-d.
C50 ppb Added'i
65
50
59
55
66
57
59
57
52
46
51
(%)
10-133
Surrogate Recovery
2-Fluorobiphenyl
f50 ppb Added"^
79
61
61
61
77
70
72
67
61
54
60
(%)
10-165
Terphenyl-dj^
(50 ppb Added)
80
74
93
94
84
87
86
74
63
57
69
(%)
10-175
0 out of 66 surrogate recoveries are outside control limits.
Test Report No. A82722
Page 24
VI. Quality Control Data (Cont^d)
General Chromatoeraphv
Aqueous Matrix Spike/Matrix Spike Duplicate Recovery Data
AnalytiKEM
Sample Spiked A82722-1
Control Limits
^ Spike performed on D1 Water
Recovery; 1 out of 73 outside control limits
RPD: 0 out of 36 outside control limits
Amotint Recovery Max
Parameter of Suike MS MSP RPD Recovery RPD
Chloromethane 20 64 71 11 70-130 30
Chloromethane ^20 86 70-130 30
Bromomethane 20 78 81 4 70-130 30
Vinyl Chloride 20 87 88 1 70-130 30
Dlchlorodifluoromethane 20 87 88 1 70-130 30
Chloroethane 20 91 96 5 70-130 30
Methylene Chloride 20 89 93 4 70-130 30
Trichlorofluoromethane 20 97 102 5 70-130 30
1,1-Dichloroethene 20 92 99 8 70-130 30
1,1-Dichloroethane 20 96 106 10 70-130 30
trans -1,2-Dichloroethene 20 93 103 10 70-130 30
Chloroform 20 94 103 9 70-130 30
1,2-Dichloroethane 20 82 90 10 70-130 30
1,1,1-Trichloroethane 20 95 100 5 70-130 30
Carbon Tetrachloride 20 99 103 4 70-130 30
Bromodichloromethane 20 92 96 4 70-130 30
1,2-Dichloropropane 20 94 100 6 70-130 30
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 20 92 95 3 70-130 30
Trichloroethene 20 96 101 5 70-130 30
1,1,2-Trichloroethane 20 91 92 1 70-130 30
Dibromochloromethane 20 91 92 1 70-130 30
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 20 91 92 1 70-130 30
2-Chloroethylvinyl Ether 20 84 85 1 70-130 30
Bromoform 20 88 90 2 70-130 30
Tetrachloroethene 20 97 99 2 70-130 30
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 20 97 99 2 70-130 30
Methyl tert-Butyl Ether (MTBE)20 77 80 4 70-130 30
Benzene 20 88 92 4 70-130 30
Toluene 20 89 96 7 70-130 30
Chlorobenzene 20 89 94 6 70-130 30
Ethylbenzene 20 90 98 9 70-130 30
m-Xylene 20 86 94 9 70-130 30
o-Xylene 20 85 93 8 70-130 30
p-Xylene 20 85 93 8 70-130 30
m-Dichlorobenzene 20 78 84 7 70-130 30
o-Dichlorobenzene 20 76 80 5 70-130 30
p-Dichlorobenzene 20 77 83 8 70-130 30
Units (ppb)(%)(%)(%)(%)(%)
Test Report No. A82722
Page 25
VI. Quality Control Data (Cont'd)
General Chromatographv
Aqueous Surrogate Recovery Data
/KnalyZiKEM
Sample
Designation
Bromochloromethane
(30 ppb Added"^
Surrogate Recovery
a,a,a-Tr ifluoro-
toluene
(30 ppb Added)
1-Chloro-
2-fluorobenz ene
(30 ppb Added)
Method Blank 1 70 77 73
Method Blank 2 90 87 100
DI Water Spike 76 92 87
DI Water Spike Dup.84 97 26
A82722-1 97 87 90
A82722-2 73 70 67
A82722-3 97 90 93
A82722-4 113 90 93
A82722-5 103 80 83
A82722-6 107 93 100
A82722-7 107 87 110
Units (%)(%)(%)
Control Limits 70-130 70-130
1o
h-
1 out of 33 surrogate recoveries are outside control limits.
Ana{ -iKEM An American NuKEM Company •35
Chain-of-Custody Record
Program Arra: Drinking Water Wastewater Groundwater Solid and Hazardous Waste
I: /TrrfA^^ Collector:Client:
Project'.—tlaLLi
Laboratory Sales Office
2324 Vemsdale Road 454 South Anderson Road BTC 532
Rock Hill, South Carolina 29731 Rock Hill. South Carolina 29730
[phone] [phone]
Fax: [phone] Pax: [phone]AnalytlKEM Contact:
SAMPLE
DESIGNATION PARAMETERS
0^
MW - U
i
REFSNARTREBMUNITEMNUMBERTRANS
FER
S
RELINQ
UI
SH
ED
BY ^TRANSF
ERS
ACCEPT
ED BYDATETIMEREMARKS1f - fP2.23f4SAMPLER
'S SIGN
ATUR
E