FA-29453_48602_CA_LSA_20221107

November 7, 2022
Liz Price North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Waste Management – UST Section –Wilmington Regional Office
127 Cardinal Drive Extension Wilmington, North Carolina 28405

Re: Limited Site Assessment – Phase I
Coliseum Family Fare BP #185
Facility ID No. 00-0-0000012822 2036 Gillespie Street, Fayetteville, Cumberland County, NC 28306
NCDEQ UST Incident Number: 48602

Dear Ms. Price: On behalf of M.M. Fowler, Inc., EMS Environmental, Inc., (EMS) has prepared the attached Limited Site
Assessment (LSA) – Phase I Report for the above referenced facility. This report has been prepared in response to a Notice of Regulatory Requirements (NORR) correspondence dated August 2, 2022 from the
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (NCDEQ) – Wilmington Regional Office.
Based upon the LSA activities the site rank appears to be Low based upon the lack of potential receptors
and current groundwater quality concentrations. Applicable cleanup levels appear to be the Residential
Maximum Soil Contaminant Concentration (MSCC) for soil and the Gross Contamination Limits (GCLs) for groundwater. The soil cleanup level has not been met but the and groundwater cleanup levels have
been met based on the current and historical analytical results presented in the report. Please review this report and provide return correspondence indicating the site's assigned Risk, Rank, and
Abatement Score and any future action required by the NCDEQ. Sincerely,
EMS Environmental, Inc.
James J. Dodson, L.G.
NC Branch Manager
cc: M.M. Fowler, Inc. (electronic) 7889 corr/file

TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 SITE HISTORY 1
1.1 UST SYSTEM INFORMATION 2
1.2 INITIAL ABATEMENT ACTIVITIES 2 1.3 PREVIOUS INVESTIGATIONS AND SOIL SAMPLING 2
2.0 LSA RISK CLASSIFICATION AND LAND USE FORM 3
3.0 RECEPTOR INFORMATION 5
3.1 WATER SUPPLY WELLS 5 3.2 PUBLIC WATER SUPPLIES 5
3.3 SURFACE WATER 6 3.4 SUBSURFACE STRUCTURES 6
3.5 LAND USE 6 3.6 PROPERTY OWNERS AND OCCUPANTS 6
4.0 LSA PHASE I SITE INVESTIGATION 6
4.1 MONITORING WELL INSTALLATION (MW-1) 6
4.2 SOIL AND GROUNDWATER SAMPLE COLLECTION 7
5.0 SITE GEOLOGY AND HYDROGEOLOGY 7
5.1 REGIONAL GEOLOGY 7 5.2 SITE GEOLOGY 7
5.3 SITE HYDROGEOLOGY 8
6.0 LSA SOIL AND GROUNDWATER MONITORING WELL SAMPLING RESULTS 8
6.1 CURRENT SOIL QUALITY – MW-1 8 6.2 GROUNDWATER QUALITY SAMPLING/MONITORING – MW-1 8
7.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 9
7.1 SITE RANK 9
7.2 SOIL AND GROUNDWATER CLEANUP LEVELS 9 7.3 ADDITIONAL WORK 9

TABLE OF CONTENTS (CONTINUED)
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1. UST Owner/Operator and Other Responsible Party Information Table 2. UST System and Other Release Information Table 3. Summary of Adjacent Property Owners and Potential Receptors
Table 4. EPA Method 5030 and 3550 – Soil Analytical Results Summary Table 5. EPA Method 8260 and 8270 – Soil Analytical Results Summary
Table 6. MADEP VPH and EPH – Soil Analytical Results Summary
Table 7. Groundwater Analytical Results Summary
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1. Site Topographic Vicinity Map
Figure 2. Site Plan Layout Map
Figure 3. Site Plan with Attempted Soil Sample Locations and Monitor Well Location Figure 4. Adjacent Property and Potential Receptor Map

LIST OF APPENDICES
Appendix A: NCDEQ Correspondence and Forms Appendix B: Description of Zoning Districts Appendix C: Adjacent Property Descriptions
Appendix D: Well Construction Record (GW-1) Form and Boring Log Appendix E: Analytical Reports with COC Documentation

1
1.0 SITE HISTORY
The Coliseum Family Fare BP #185 (Facility ID 00-0-0000012822) is located at 2036 Gillespie Street, Fayetteville, Cumberland County, North Carolina 28306. The site vicinity and location are shown on the
attached portion of the Burlington, NC 7.5 Minute Series topographical map included as Figure 1. The site is characterized by the convenience store building, canopy, and petroleum dispensing equipment and
Underground Storage Tank (UST) equipment related to retail petroleum fuel operations. Site features are
illustrated on the Site Plan Map included as Figure 2. Site sample locations are illustrated on the Site Plan with Attempted Soil Sample and Monitor Well Location Map included as Figure 3.

The surrounding property is primarily commercial along Gillespie Street and Owen Drive. Commercial adjacent properties exist in all geographic directions from the site except to the north which is
undeveloped. An Ambassador Inn exists across Owen Drive to the east, an Exxon gasoline retail station
and an Auto Zone are present across Owen Drive to the south, and to the west is an abandoned business. The nearest residential properties are located to the northwest along Jenkins Street and are characterized
by single occupant residences. Subsurface utilities at the site include storm and septic sewer lines,
municipal water lines, fiber optic cables, natural gas lines, and underground power lines. The site and site vicinity are serviced by municipal water and sanitary sewer service. On site storm water is collected in storm
sewer catchment basins located throughout its paved surfaces or in the Gillespie Street or Owen Drive right-of-way.
Investigation for a potential release from the existing underground storage tank (UST) system was initiated
following the failure of hydrostatic testing for the two Regular unleaded gasoline and the Premium gasoline UST spill buckets. The hydrostatic tests were performed by JF Petroleum Group (JFGP) on May 29, 2022.
FPG, on behalf of M.M. Fowler, Inc. (Fowler) contacted EMS Environmental, Inc. (EMS) via electronic
communication on June 7, 2022 to conduct a site check at the facility. A UST 17A UST Suspected Release 24 Hour Notice form and a UST6D/23A Triennial UST Spill Bucket Integrity Testing form
(Appendix A) was prepared by JF Petroleum Group (JFPG) for the failed spill buckets and submitted to
the NCDEQ. JFPG has reportedly repaired the spill buckets and subsequently performed a passing hydrostatic test for both. Documentation was forwarded under separate cover to the NCDEQ by JFPG.

On July 7, 2022 EMS Environmental, Inc. (EMS) personnel mobilized to the site to perform a Site Check to assess soil quality immediately adjacent to both of the regular and the premium unleaded gasoline UST spill
buckets. One soil sample was collected at each location from approximately 1.5 to 2.0 feet below ground surface (bgs) and were identified as SS-1 (10K regular gasoline UST), SS-2 (6K regular gasoline UST), and SS-3 (6K premium gasoline UST). The sample locations are depicted on Figure 3. Each soil sample was
submitted for laboratory analysis by EPA Method 5030 Gasoline Range Organics (GRO) as appropriate for a gasoline only release investigation. Additional sample volume was collected for EPA Method 8260 for Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) and for Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection
(MADEP) Volatile Petroleum Hydrocarbons (VPH) in the event the GRO concentration was in excess of the NCDEQ Soil Action level of 50 mg/Kg.

Analysis of site check samples indicated a detectable concentration of GRO in all soil samples. SS-1 exhibited a detectable concentration of 8,000 mg/Kg GRO, SS-2 exhibited 2,600 mg/Kg of GRO, and SS-
3 exhibited 32 mg/Kg GRO. The reported laboratory results for both regular unleaded gasoline samples
(SS-1 and SS-2) are above the respective NCDEQ Soil Action Limits of 50 mg/Kg for GRO. SS-3 (premium gasoline UST) was reported below the NCDEQ Soil Action Limit for GRO.

2
Site Check soil laboratory analytical results for EPA Method 8260 indicated that multiple EPA 8260
targeted compounds were detected in both soil samples SS-1 and SS-2 above the Soil to Groundwater Maximum Soil Contaminant Concentrations (MSCCs) for each targeted compound detected. Soil sample SS-3 had a reported concentration of the compounds Methylene Chloride and Naphthalene above their
respective Soil to Groundwater MSCC.
Site Check soil laboratory analytical results for MADEP VPH indicated that concentrations of multiple
target petroleum hydrocarbon fractions were reported to be present in each sample. The reported concentrations of petroleum hydrocarbon fractions C5-C8 aliphatics and C9-C22 aromatics in soil
samples SS-1 and SS-2 were reported above their respective Soil to Groundwater MSCC. No petroleum
hydrocarbon fraction was reported above the Soil to Groundwater MSCC for soil sample SS-3.
Based on the soil exceedances of the Soil to Groundwater MSCCs for multiple target compounds, a UST-
61 24-Hour Release and UST Leak Reporting form was prepared and is included in Appendix A.
The site check investigative results were included in a report entitled “Site Check Report: Coliseum Family
Fare BP #185” submitted to the NCDEQ on July 20, 2022. Based on the review of the report the NCDEQ
issued Notice of Regulatory Requirements (NORR) correspondence dated August 2, 2022 requesting the performance of a Limited Site Assessment (LSA) – Phase I Report (Appendix A). The purpose of this LSA
– Phase I is to address the NCDEQ correspondence and comply with 15A NCAC 2L .0405. 1.1 UST System Information
The station is currently serviced by four underground storage tanks (USTs) including one 10,000-gallon capacity regular unleaded gasoline UST, one 6,000-gallon capacity regular unleaded gasoline UST, one
6,000-gallon capacity premium unleaded gasoline UST, and one 2,000-gallon capacity diesel UST. The current USTs and dispenser islands are located as shown in Figure 2. All of the current tanks are owned and
operated by Fowler. Site History – UST Owner/Operator and Other Responsible Party Information has
been summarized in Table 1. A current and former UST inventory has been included as Site History – UST System and Other Release Information summarized in Table 2.

1.2 Initial Abatement Activities
No initial abatement have occurred to date at this site. 1.3 Previous Investigations and Soil Sampling
No previous releases are associated with the current or former USTs at this facility.

3

2.0 LSA RISK CLASSIFICATION AND LAND USE FORM Part I-Groundwater/Surface Water/Vapor Impacts
High Risk

1. Has the discharge or release contaminated any water supply well including any used for non-drinking purposes? NO

2. Is there a water supply well used for drinking water located within 1,000 feet of the source area of the discharge or release? NO

3. Is a water supply well used for any purpose (e.g., irrigation, washing cars, industrial cooling water, filling swimming pools) located within 250 feet of the source area of the discharge or release? NO

4. Does groundwater within 500 feet of the source area of the discharge or release have the potential for future use in that there is no other source of water supply other than the groundwater? NO
Municipal water is available locally to all commercial and residential properties.
5. Do vapors from the discharge or release pose a threat of explosion because of the accumulation of the vapors in a confined space or pose any other serious threat to public health, public safety or the
environment? NO
6. Are there any other factors that would cause the discharge or release to pose any imminent danger to
public health, public safety, or the environment? NO
Intermediate Risk

7. Is a surface water body located within 500 feet of the discharge or release? NO
Surface water was not identified within 500 feet of the site. The nearest surface water body has been identified as an unnamed tributary (UT) of Pearces Mill Creek located approximately 2,250 feet to the southeast. Pearces Mill Creek (Stream Index 18-30) is designated as a Class C water from its source to
the Cape Fear River. If yes, does the maximum groundwater contaminant concentration exceed the surface water quality
standards and criteria found in 15A NCAC 2B .0200 by a factor of 10? N/A 8. Is the source area of the discharge or release located within a designated wellhead protection area as
defined in 42 USC 300-h-7 (e)? NO
9. Is the discharge or release located in the Coastal Plain Physiographic Region as designated on a map
entitled ‘Geology of North Carolina’ published by the Department in 1985? NO
10. Do the levels of groundwater contamination for any contaminant exceed the gross contamination
levels (see most recent version of NCDEQ “Guidelines for Assessment and Corrective Action for UST Releases”) established by the department? NO

Based on the results of Part I this questionnaire, it appears the site ranking is LOW.

4
Part II-Land Use
Property Containing Source Area of Discharge of Release
The questions below pertain to the property containing the source area of the release.
1. Does the property contain one or more secondary residences (permanent or temporary)? NO
2. Does the property contain a school, day care center, hospital, playground, park, recreation area, church,
nursing home, or other place of public assembly? NO
3. Does the property contain a commercial (e.g., retail, warehouse, office/business space, etc.) or
industrial (e.g., manufacturing, utilities, industrial research and development, chemical/petroleum bulk
storage, etc.) enterprise, an inactive commercial or industrial enterprise, or is the land undeveloped? YES
4. Do children visit the property? YES
The property is likely visited by children who may or may not be under adult supervision.
5. Is access to the property reliably restricted consistent with its use (e.g., by fences, security personnel or both)? NO
6. Do pavement, buildings, or other structures cap the contaminated soil? YES

If yes, what mechanisms are in place or can be put into place to ensure that the contaminated soil will remain capped in the foreseeable future.
The surface is expected to remain asphalt and/or concrete covered for the foreseeable future.
7. What is the zoning status of the property?
The property is designated as “CC” for a Community Commercial District. See Figure 4 for a land use
map of the immediate site vicinity and Appendix B for a zoning map and description of zoning categories in that portion of Fayetteville, Cumberland County, North Carolina.
8. Is the use of the property likely to change in the next twenty years? One cannot forecast with any certainty the future use of the property within a twenty year time period, however it is a reasonable assumption that the use will not change in the immediate future.
Property Surrounding Source Area of Discharge or Release
The questions below pertain to the area within 1,500 feet of the source area of the discharge or release
(excludes property containing source area of the release):
9. What is the distance from the source area of the release to the nearest primary or secondary residence
(permanent or temporary)?
The nearest primary residence is located at 120 West Jenkins Street, approximately 350 feet northwest of
the gasoline UST basin source area.

5
10. What is the distance from the source area of the release to the nearest school, day care center, hospital,
playground, park, recreation area, church, nursing home or other place of public assembly? The New Testament Christian Church of Fayetteville, NC is located approximately 0.2 miles northwest of
the gasoline UST basin source area.
11. What is the zoning status of properties in the surrounding area?
Adjacent properties in the surrounding area are zoned primarily as Community Commercial District
(CC), Limited Commercial District (LC), or Single Family Residential 6 District (SF-6). See Figure 4 for a land use map of the immediate site vicinity and Appendix C for a description of zoning categories in that portion of Fayetteville, Cumberland County, North Carolina.

12. Briefly characterize the use and activities of the land in the surrounding area.
Commercial properties dominate the use and activities of the adjacent properties located on Gillespie Street and Owens Drive. Residential properties dominate the use and activities of properties located to the north and northwest.

3.0 RECEPTOR INFORMATION
A potential receptor survey was performed on August 9, 2022 during LSA Phase I activities. A door to door search of all residences and business establishments within 500 feet of the site and a windshield
survey within 1,500 feet was performed in support of the receptor survey. In the event a property owner
was unavailable on the dates the receptor survey was performed or a municipal water connection was not observed, neighbors were questioned for knowledge about water well information and a flyer was left at
the property directing the owner to contact EMS with information pertaining to water supply wells. No potable water supply wells were identified within 1,500 feet of the site as a result of the receptor
survey. One non-potable water supply well was identified to be present between 500 and 1,000 feet of the gasoline UST basin source area as shown on Figure 4. No water supply wells for any purpose were located within 500 feet of the release source. Adjacent property ownership, contact information, and
zoning were researched through the Cumberland County Geographic Information System (GIS). Adjacent property information has been updated to reflect current property owner status as of November 2022. The summary of adjacent property information is tabulated in Table 3 and shown in Figure 4. A zoning
description is attached in Appendix B and adjacent property information is included in Appendix C. 3.1 Water Supply Wells
No water supply wells have been identified within 1,500 feet of the UST basin source area.
3.2 Public Water Supplies The site and site vicinity are served by municipal water supplied by the City of Fayetteville, NC. Water
mains are located in the right-of-way for all streets included within the receptor survey and water meters were observed leading to all properties.

6
3.3 Surface Water
Surface water was not identified within 500 feet of the site. The nearest surface water body has been identified as an unnamed tributary (UT) of Pearces Mill Creek located approximately 2,250 feet to the
southeast. Pearces Mill Creek (Stream Index 18-30) is designated as a Class C water from its source to the Cape Fear River.

3.4 Subsurface Structures Subsurface utilities at the site include:
- Municipal Water Line - Sanitary Sewer - Storm Sewer
- Cable - Fiber Optics - Electricity
- Phone - Natural Gas
3.5 Land Use
The site vicinity includes a mix of residential, commercial, and light industrial properties. Adjacent property
is primarily commercial along Gillespie Street and Owens Drive. Commercial adjacent properties exist in all geographic directions from the site except to the north which is undeveloped. An Ambassador Inn exists across Owen Drive to the east, an Exxon gasoline retail station and an Auto Zone are present across
Owen Drive to the south, and to the west is an abandoned business. The nearest residential properties are located to the northwest and are characterized by single occupant residences. Figure 4 is a local land use map.
3.6 Property Owners and Occupants
Adjacent property owners and occupants are tabulated in Table 3.

4.0 LSA PHASE I SITE INVESTIGATION
Since site check soil samples indicated that a release had occurred from the regular gasoline UST sumps, it was required that a groundwater monitoring well be installed down gradient and adjacent to the UST basin during LSA investigative activities. The purpose of the monitoring well was to collect soil and
groundwater samples to determine if the release of petroleum hydrocarbons had also impacted
groundwater quality. As a result, groundwater quality in the vicinity has been assessed with the installation of monitoring well, MW-1. Additional well installations were not required for the LSA
investigation since there was a single source area. 4.1 Monitoring Well Installation (MW-1)
EMS contracted Ransier Environmental Drilling, (REDI) to install one Type-II 2-inch diameter PVC
monitoring well identified as MW-1 on September 22, 2022 in the location shown on Figure 3. The 2-
inch PVC Type-II well was installed using hollow stem augers to a depth of 35 feet bgs. The well was constructed consisting of 2-inch schedule 40 PVC pipe with 20-feet of 0.01-inch slotted well screen and
15-feet of riser pipe. The well was completed with sand to 2.0-feet above the top of their screen, a 2.0-
foot bentonite seal, and neat cement to 0.5-feet bgs. The surface completion consisted of an 8-inch round steel manhole set within 2-foot diameter circular pad. Well construction diagrams/GW-1 forms are
included in Appendix D.

7

4.2 Soil and Groundwater Sample Collection LSA Soil Sample Collection (MW-1)
Soil samples were collected using direct push 5-foot long macro-core sampling tubes and liners prior to
boring with the use of hollow stem augers at monitoring well MW-1. One sample was collected
approximately every five feet from below ground surface (bgs) to above the top of the apparent shallow groundwater table. Samples were collected directly from the macro-core liners using new disposable
powder free nitrile gloves. The soil samples were collected into laboratory supplied/preserved containers
and then emplaced within an ice chilled cooler for transportation to Environmental Conservation Laboratories, Inc. (ENCO) (NC Certification #591) located in Cary, NC.

A total of four soil samples were submitted for laboratory analysis from MW-1 and included samples identified as MW-1 (5 feet), MW-1 (10 feet), MW-1 (15 feet), and MW-1 (20 feet). The locations
represented the first sample collected from below ground surface in residual materials and the last sample
collected from above the perceived soil-groundwater interface at five foot depth intervals. All samples were submitted for laboratory analysis by MADEP VPH. The first sample collected below ground surface
and the last sample collected from above the perceived soil to groundwater interface were additionally submitted for laboratory analysis by EPA Method 8260.
LSA Groundwater Sample Collection (MW-1) Monitoring well MW-1 was monitored and sampled on October 11, 2022. The well was measured for
depth-to-water (DTW) and for the presence of PSH using a SolinstTM oil/water IFP accurate to 0.01 feet prior to sampling. DTW in MW-1 was measured at 22.00 feet BTOC and PSH was not present.

Following the monitoring, MW-1 was purged of three to five well volumes with disposable polyethylene bailers and nylon string. The well was then allowed to recharge within 95% of its pre-development depth
to water prior to sampling. One groundwater sample was collected and were poured into laboratory
supplied/preserved sample containers, placed in an ice-chilled cooler and delivered to ENCO Laboratories for analysis by EPA Methods 6200B with Oxygenates for Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs), total
lead by EPA Method 6010, EPA Method 504.1 for low detection EDB, and MADEP VPH consistent with a gasoline release.
5.0 SITE GEOLOGY AND HYDROGEOLOGY
5.1 Regional Geology
According to the North Carolina Geologic Map (1985), the site is located within the Coastal Plain Physiographic Province in the Middendorf Formation (Km). The Geologic Map of North Carolina
describes the Middendorf Formation as Cretaceous aged sand, sandstone, mudstone, gray to pale gray with an orange cast, mottled; clay balls and iron-cemented concretions common, beds laterally
discontinuous, cross-bedding common, (Brown et al, 1985).
5.2 Site Geology
Site geology has been characterized through observations of the soil boring during the installation of MW-1. During the installation of MW-1, a tan to brown silty sand was encountered up to 20 feet BGS
prior to transitioning to a dark reddish brown sandy clay that extended to approximately 35 feet BGS.
Bedrock was not encountered or observed in the excavation.

8

5.3 Site Hydrogeology Groundwater was measured with an oil/water IFP accurate to 0.01 feet on October 11, 2022 from MW-1.
Depth to water was measured at a depth of 22.00 feet BTOC and PSH was not observed to be present.
6.0 LSA SOIL AND GROUNDWATER MONITORING WELL SAMPLING RESULTS
The following sections detail the September 22, 2022 soil sampling results and the October 11, 2022
groundwater sampling results.
6.1 Current Soil Quality – MW-1
Soil quality information for the site has been derived from the collection of soil samples during the site check activities and the installation of MW-1. The GRO and DRO soil sample results are summarized in
Table 4. The soil quality analytical results are summarized in Table 5 and Table 6. Complete soil
analytical reports for the LSA samples with chain-of-custody (COC) documentation are included in Appendix E. The results are summarized below:

EPA Method 8260 – Volatiles
Laboratory soil analytical results for the LSA soil samples are summarized in Table 5 (EPA Method 8260 Soil Analytical Results Summary). Review of Table 5 indicates that at multiple EPA 8260 targeted compounds were detected soil sample MW-1 (20 feet). Of the detected compounds, only the
concentration of Benzene was reported above the Soil to Groundwater MSCC. Soil sample MW-1 (5 feet) had no reported concentrations of the target compounds.
MADEP VPH
Laboratory soil analytical results for the LSA soil samples are summarized in Table 6 (MADEP VPH Soil
Analytical Results Summary). Review of Table 6 indicates that concentrations of one or more target
petroleum hydrocarbon fractions were reported to be present in each sample. Of the detected concentrations of petroleum hydrocarbon fractions C5-C8 aliphatics (MW-1 10 Feet) and C9-C22
aromatics (all samples) none reported above their respective Soil to Groundwater MSCC. 6.2 Groundwater Quality Sampling/Monitoring – MW-1
The laboratory analytical results for the October 11, 2022 sample event are tabulated on Table 7 and summarized below. Complete laboratory analytical reports with supporting COC documentation are
included in Appendix E. 1.) EPA Method 6200Bw/ Oxygenates
Analysis by EPA Method 6200B with oxygenates revealed detectable concentrations of multiple targeted
compounds. Of the detected compounds, the concentration for Benzene (140 ug/L) was reported in excess
of the corresponding NCAC 2L Groundwater Quality Standard (GWQS) but less than the Gross Contamination Limits (GCLs).

9
2.) Total Lead EPA Method 6010C
Analysis by EPA Method 3030C with extraction Method 6010C revealed an estimated detectable concentration of Total Lead above the method detection limit at 7.3 ug/L. The result is less than the 15A NCAC 2L groundwater standard for Lead of 15 ug/L.
3.) Ethylene Di-bromide (EDB) EPA Method 504.1
Analysis for EDB by EPA Method 504.1 revealed a non-detectable concentration of EDB for the sample
collected from MW-1. The result is less than the 15A NCAC 2L groundwater standard for EDB of 0.02 ug/L.
4.) MADEP VPH and EPH
Analysis by MADEP VPH revealed concentrations of multiple petroleum hydrocarbon fractions including C5-C8 aliphatics (355 ug/L), C19-C18 aliphatics (74.7 ug/L), and the C9-C22 aromatics (120 ug/L). Of
the detected concentrations, none were reported in excess of their corresponding NCAC 2L GWQS for
the respective petroleum hydrocarbon fraction.

7.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
7.1 Site Rank
The site appears to fall within the Low risk category due to the following factors:
- Water supply water wells were not identified within 1,000 feet of the site. - Non-potable water wells were not identified within 250 feet of the site. - Surface water was not identified within 500 feet of the site.
- Groundwater analytical data indicates that all detectable compounds are at concentrations less than the GCL standard.

7.2 Soil and Groundwater Cleanup Levels
The site is situated within a commercially zoned area with the nearest residential housing located
primarily to the east. Based on the apparent site risk, EMS recommends the application of the Residential MSCC cleanup levels to the site soils due to the site location and the GCLs to the site groundwater.
For the detected compounds and petroleum hydrocarbon fractions for soil samples collected for the site check and LSA Phase I, several compounds have been reported with concentrations above the Residential
MSCC (Table 5 and Table 6). In addition, the compounds Benzene and Naphthalene for site check soil
sample SS-1 were reported at concentrations above the Industrial/Commercial MSCC.
The GCL groundwater cleanup level has been met.
7.3 Additional Work
Based upon the Site Check soil sample results, it appears that impacted soils above the applicable cleanup
levels are located in the vicinity of the regular unleaded gasoline spill sumps. Additional soil assessment and abatement in that area appear to be necessary. However, for soil samples collected from MW-1, no
recommendations for any additional soil assessment outside of the UST basin proper appear to be
necessary.

10

Results collected from the performance of this LSA Phase I revealed that dissolved phase Benzene was reported in excess of the NCAC 2L groundwater standard but less than the corresponding GCL in source monitoring well, MW-1. At this time, based on the most recent sample event for MW-1, no additional
groundwater assessment is advocated.
Based upon the results of the soil and groundwater quality sampling performed during site check
activities, it appears that the risk is Low. Since the site appears to be Low, the site may be eligible for NFA status under a groundwater NRP. In addition, if additional assessment and abatement of soil in the
vicinity of the regular unleaded gasoline spill sumps below the Residential MSCC, the site may be
eligible for NFA status without the need for a soil NRP. EMS, on behalf of M.M. Fowler, Inc., respectfully requests return correspondence following review of this report indicating any future action
required by the NCDEQ.

TABLES
Date: 11/2022 Incident Number/Name:#48602/Coliseum FF #185UST ID NumberUST-1A, UST-2A, UST-3A, and UST-4A Facility ID Number00-0-0000012822M.M. Fowler, Inc.City State Zip Code Telephone NumberDurham NC 27705 919.309.2925Same as above City State Zip Code Telephone Number Note:1.) M.M. Fowler, Inc. acquired the property in May 1990.2.) No prior releases were identified from NCDEQ database searchs. May 31, 1990 - presentName of of Other Responsible party Dates of Release(s) (mm/dd/yy to mm/dd/yy)Street Address Name of Operator Dates of Operation (mm/dd/yy to mm/dd/yy)Table 1: Site History - UST Owner/Operator and Other Responsible Party InformationM.M. Fowler, Inc. : Coliseum Family Fare BP #1852036 Gillespie Street, Fayetteville, Cumberland County, North Carolina 28306Facility ID No. 00-0-0000012822EMS Project No. 7889Name of Owner Dates of Ownership (mm/dd/yy to mm/dd/yy)May 31, 1990 - present (UST-1A, UST-2A, UST-3A, and UST-4A)Street Address4220 Neal RoadPage 1 of 1
DATE: 11/2022 Incident Number/Name:UST ID NumberLast ContentsPrevious ContentsCapacity (in gallons)Construction DetailsTank Dimensions (ft.)Description of Piping and PumpsDate Tank InstalledStatus of USTWas release associated with the UST System?UST-1ARegular Gas- 10,000Single Wall SteelUnknown Single wall FRP 3/30/1990 Current YesUST-2ARegular Gas- 6,000Single Wall SteelUnknown Single wall FRP 3/30/1990 Current YesUST-3APremium Gas- 6,000Single Wall SteelUnknown Single wall FRP 3/30/1990 Current NoUST-4A Diesel - 2,000Single Wall Steel/ FRPUnknown Single wall FRP 3/30/1990 Current NoUST-1 Used Oil - 550Single Wall SteelUnknown Single Wall Steel 5/13/1963Removed 3/30/1990NoUST-2 Diesel - 550Single Wall SteelUnknown Single Wall Steel 5/13/1963Removed 3/30/1990NoUST-3 gasoline - 6,000Single Wall SteelUnknown Single Wall Steel 5/12/1964Removed 3/30/1990NoUST-4 gasoline - 6,000Single Wall SteelUnknown Single Wall Steel 5/12/1964Removed 3/30/1990NoUST-5 gasoline - 6,000Single Wall SteelUnknown Single Wall Steel 5/12/1964Removed 3/30/1990NoUST-6 gasoline - 10,000Single Wall SteelUnknown Single Wall Steel 5/10/1972Removed 3/30/1990NoNote:1.) A release occurred from the spill sump of regular gas UST-1A and UST-2A as confirmed by laboratory analyses for site check.2.) FRP denotes Fiberglass Reinforced Plastic.3.) UST information taken from NCDEQ Registered tank database. Former site tanks (UST-1 to UST-6) owned/operated by BP Oil. 4.) M.M. Fowler, Inc. acquired the property in May 1990.#48602/Coliseum FF #185Table 2:Site History-UST System and Other Release InformationM.M. Fowler, Inc. : Coliseum Family Fare BP #1852036 Gillespie Street, Fayetteville, Cumberland County, North Carolina 28306EMS Project No. 7889Facility ID No. 00-0-0000012822Page 1 of 1
DATE: 11/2022Incident Number/Name: #48602 / Coliseum FF #185OWNER DIRECTION Property MAILING FROMProperty Property OWNER / OCCUPANT ADDRESS ADDRESS SOURCE PHONE ID # UsageADJACENT PROPERTIESM.M. Fowler, Inc. 2036 Gillespie Street4220 Neal RoadSITE(919) 309-2925 0436-12-1424 Gas / ConvenienceColiseum Family Fare #185 Fayetteville, NC 28306 Durham, NC 27705 FadhL Alhobishi 110 West Jenkins Street6501 Barbour Lake RoadNorth #1 N/A 0436-03-9029 CommercialCell Tower Fayetteville, NC 28306 Fayetteville, NC 28306 FadhL Alhobishi 2026 Gillespie Street6501 Barbour Lake RoadNorth #2 N/A 0436-12-1696 UndevelopedVacant Fayetteville, NC 28306 Fayetteville, NC 28306 FadhL Alhobishi 2024 Gillespie Street6501 Barbour Lake RoadNorth #3 N/A 0436-12-2771 UndevelopedVacant Fayetteville, NC 28306 Fayetteville, NC 28306 Association Service Corp T/A 2025 S. Eastern BoulevardP.O. Box 64102East N/A 0436-12-7651 CommercialAmbassodor Inn Fayetteville, NC 28306 Fayetteville, NC 28306 Autozone Development Corporation 2303 Gillespie Street123 South Front StreetSoutheast N/A 0436-12-4155 CommercialAuto Zone Fayetteville, NC 28306 Memphis, TN 38101 Martha C. Sullivan, et al.2302 Gillespie Street1007 Arsenal AvenueSouthwest N/A 0436-12-0044 CommercialExxon Gas Station Fayetteville, NC 28306 Fayetteville, NC 28305 Martha C. Sullivan, et al.3081 Owen Drive 2046 Owen Drive West N/A 0436-02-9397 CommercialExxon Gas Station Fayetteville, NC 28306 Fayetteville, NC 28306 Notes:1. All information gathered from Cumberland County GIS website in October 2022.2. Sites are located as shown on Figure 4. Table 3. Summary of Adjacent Property OwnersM.M. Fowler, Inc. : Coliseum Family Fare BP #185Facility ID No. 00-0-00000128222036 Gillespie Street, Fayetteville, Cumberland County, North Carolina 28306EMS Project No. 7889Page 1 of 1
DATE: 11/2022Incident Number/Name:SampleGRO DROSample Sample Depth Sample PID Field Screening EPA 5030 EPA 3550ID Date (feet) Type Conc. In ppm Conc. in mg/Kg Conc. in mg/KgSS-1 7-Jul-22 1.5 - 2.0 Site Check UST-1A 381.98,000NSSS-2 7-Jul-22 1.5 - 2.0 Site Check UST-2A 347.82,600NSSS-3 7-Jul-22 1.5 - 2.0 Site Check UST-3A 385.9 32 NSMW-1 22-Sep-22 5.0 Site Check Monitor Well 0.0 NS NSMW-1 22-Sep-22 10.0 Site Check Monitor Well 4.9 NS NSMW-1 22-Sep-22 15.0 Site Check Monitor Well 40.4 NS NSMW-1 22-Sep-22 20.0 Site Check Monitor Well 22.7 NS NSNCDEQ Action Level50 mg/Kg 100 mg/KgNotes: 1.) NS denotes Not Sampled for that analysis. 2.) BRL denotes not detected above the reporting limit stated on analytical report.3.) Bold font on sample result indicates exceedance of 50/100 mg/Kg NCDEQ Action Level for GRO/DRO. 4.) ppm denotes parts per million.#48602/ Coliseum FF #185Table 4. EPA 5030 (GRO) and 3550 (DRO) Soil Analytical Results SummaryM.M. Fowler, Inc. : Coliseum Family Fare BP #185Facility ID No. 00-0-00000128222036 Gillespie Street, Fayetteville, Cumberland County, North Carolina 28306EMS Project No. 7889Page 1 of 1
DATE: 11/2022Incident Number/Name:I. EPA 8260 Analytical Results Max Soil IndustrialTo Groundwater Residential Commercial SS-1 SS-2 SS-3 MW-1 MW-1 MW-1 MW-1Concentration MSCCs MSCCs 7/7/2022 7/7/2022 7/7/2022 9/22/2022 9/22/2022 9/22/2022 9/22/2022EPA 8260 (mg/Kg) (mg/Kg) (mg/Kg) 1.5 - 2.0 feet 1.5 - 2.0 feet 1.5 - 2.0 feet 5 feet 10 feet 15 feet 20 feetDetected CompoundsBenzene 0.0072 12 59.47312BRL BRL NS NS0.0081Toluene 5.4 1,250 18,600 990 2300.48 BRL NS NS BRLEthylbenzene 8.0 60.3 297270 660.19 BRL NS NS 0.002Xylenes (total) 6.0 3,120 46,700 1500 3902.0 BRL NS NS 0.00541,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 6.6 156 2,330530 1702.0 BRL NS NS 0.00181,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 6.6 156 2,330 150 500.53 BRL NS NS 0.00052 JIsopropylbenzene 1.3 1,560 23,300 31 270BRL BRL NS NS BRLMethylene Chloride 0.023 93.8 1,400BRL BRL0.19 JBRL NS NS BRLNaphthalene 0.2 5.5 2746190.64BRL NS NS 0.00055 Jn-Butylbenzene 2.4 782 11,600 40 13BRL BRL NS NS BRLn-Propylbenzene 1.4 1,560 23,300 100 280.15 BRL NS NS BRLsec-Butylbenzene 2.2 1,560 23,300BRL BRL BRL BRL NS NS 0.00097 JEPA 8260 Notes:1.) BRL denotes not detected above the reporting limit stated on analytical report.2.) Bold font on sample result indicates exceedance of Soil to GW MSCC or detection of a compound with No Standard.3.) Bold RED font on sample result indicates exceedance of the Residential MSCC.4.) "J" indicates the compound was detected, but below the reporting limit; therefore, the result is an estimated concentration.5.) "NS" indicates not sampled on the date of collection.Results are in mg/Kg#48602 / Coliseum FF #185Table 5. EPA Method 8260 Soil Analytical Results SummaryM.M. Fowler, Inc. : Coliseum Family Fare BP #1852036 Gillespie Street, Fayetteville, Cumberland County, North Carolina 28306Facility ID No. 00-0-0000012822EMS Project No. 7889Page 1 of 1
DATE: 11/2022Incident Number/Name: #48602 / Coliseum FF #185I. MADEP VPH onlyMax Soil Max SoilConcentration Concentration SS-1 SS-2 SS-3 MW-1 MW-1 MW-1 MW-1Sum of Analytical Soil/GwtrResidential 7/7/2022 7/7/2022 7/7/2022 9/22/2022 9/22/2022 9/22/2022 9/22/2022 Hydrocarbon Fractions (mg/Kg) (mg/Kg) 1.5 - 2.0 feet 1.5 - 2.0 feet 1.5 - 2.0 feet 5 feet 10 feet 15 feet 20 feetALIPHATICS Petroleum C5-C8C5-C8 Ali (VPH)68 6251,4904465.36 BRL 9.45 BRL BRLPetroleum C9-C18C9-C12 Aliph. (VPH) + C9-C18 Aliph. (EPH)540 1,560437 171 2.18 BRL BRL BRL BRLPetroleum C19-C36C19-C36 Ali (EPH)# 31,200NA NA NA NA NA NA NAAROMATICSPetroleum C9-C22 C9-C10 Arom. (VPH) + C11-C22 Arom. (EPH)31 4695562465.84 2.43 5.75 1.68 1.72NOTES: 1.) Bold font indicates an exceedance of the Soil to Groundwater MSCCs. 2.) Bold RED font indicates an exceedance of the Residential MSCCs. 3.) NA denotes not analyzed for that petroleum hydrocarbon fraction. 4.) BRL denotes not detected above the reporting limit stated on analytical report. 5.) # Health based Level > 100%.All Sample Results in mg/Kg Table 6. MADEP VPH Laboratory Soil Analytical Results SummaryM.M. Fowler, Inc. : Coliseum Family Fare BP #1852036 Gillespie Street, Fayetteville, Cumberland County, NC 28306Facility ID No. 00-0-0000012822EMS Project No. 7889Page 1 of 1
DATE: 11/2022 Incident Number/Name: #48602 / Coliseum FF #185
I. EPA 6200B ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Well IDDateBenzene
MW-1 10/11/2022 140.0 6 40 98.0 BRL 1.4 47 7.9 1.0 3.4 1.9 3.1 8.1 2.6
NCAC 2L GWS 1 600 600 500 20 70 400 400 25 70 6 70 70 70
GCL Standard 5,000 260,000 80,000 50,000 20,000 70,000 28,500 24,100 11,700 30,500 6,000 5,900 26,100 8,800
II. MADEP VPH ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Well IDDateC5-C8 AliphaticsC9-C18 Aliphatics (C9-C12 Aliphatics + C9-C18 Aliphatics)C19-C36 AliphaticsC9-C22 Aromatics (C9-C10 Aromatics + C11-C22 Aromatics)
MW-1 110/11/2022 355 74.7 NA 120
NCAC 2L Standard 400 700 10,000 200
GCL Standard NS NS NS NS
III. Total Lead Well IDDatePB
MW-1 10/11/2022 7.3 J
NCAC 2L Standard 15
GCL Standard 15,000
IV. EPA 504.1 Well IDDateEDB
MW-1 10/11/2022 BRL
NCAC 2L Standard 0.02
GCL Standard 50
NOTES:
1.) All reported concentrations in ug/L.
2.) Bold Font indicates exceedance of the NCAC 2L Groundwater Standard (GWS).
3.) Concentrations followed by a "J" indicate an estimated value between the Reporting Limit and the Method Detection Limit.
4.) NA denotes not analyzed for that petroleum hydrocarbon fraction.
5.) BRL denotes below the method reporting limit as stated on the analytical report.4-IsopropyltolueneNaphthalenen-Butyl BenzeneTable 7. Groundwater Laboratory Analytical Results Summary
M.M. Fowler, Inc. : Coliseum Family Fare BP #185
Facility ID No. 00-0-0000012822
2036 Gillespie Street, Fayetteville, Cumberland County, North Carolina 28306
EMS Project No. 7889
sec-ButylbenzeneSelected Compounds
TolueneEthylbenzeneXylenes (Total)MTBE1,2,4-TrimethylbenzeneIPE1,3,5-TrimethylbenzeneIsopropylbenzenen-Propyl BenzenePage 1 of 1

FIGURES
SCALE IN FEET
1,000 FEET RADIUS
APPROXIMATE
0
500
1000 2000
FIGURE 1: SITE TOPOGRAPHIC VICINITY MAP
COLESIUM FAMILY FARE BP #185
2036 GILLESPIE STREET, FAYETTEVILLE, CUMBERLAND COUNTY, NC 28306
DATE: 7/20/2022
DRAWN BY: JJD
EMS PROJ. 7889
PORTION OF FAYETTEVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA 7.5 MINUTE SERIES USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAPS (2019)
SITELOCATION
N0.025APPROXIMATE SCALEIN FEETIMAGE SOURCE GOOGLE EARTH 2021 IMAGE50100FIGURE 2: SITE PLAN LAYOUT MAPCOLISEUM FAMILY FARE BP #185 - M.M. FOWLER, INC.DRAWN BY: JJD2036 GILLESPIE STREET, FAYETTEVILLE, CUMBERLAND COUNTY, NC 28306DATE: 7/20/2022PROJECT NO: 7889
NEXPLANATION0.02040 80APPROXIMATE SCALEIN FEETFIGURE 3: SITE MAP WITH SOIL BORING AND MONITOR WELL LOCATIONSCOLISEUM FAMILY FARE BP #1852036 GILLESPIE STREET, FAYETTEVILLE, CUMBERLAND COUNTY, NC 28306MODIFIED BY: JJDDATE: 11/03/2022PROJECT NO: 7889SS-1SS-1SS-2SS-3IMAGE DATE JULY 2017 FROM GOOGLE EARTH CORE DRILL SOIL SAMPLE LOCATIONMW-1MW-1MONITORING WELL LOCATION
N0.0800200400APPROXIMATE SCALEIN FEETIMAGE OBTAINED FROM CUMBERLAND COUNTY GIS IMAPS WEBSITE1000 FOOT RADIUSDRAWN BY: JJDDATE: 11/03/2022PROJECT NO: 7889FIGURE 4: ADJACENT PROPERTY MAPCOLISEUM FAMILY FARE #185 : M.M. FOWLER, INC.2036 GILLIESPIE STREET, FAYETTEVILLE, CUMBERLAND COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA 28306

APPENDIX A

NCDEQ Correspondence
And
NCDEQ Forms – UST -6D/23A, UST-17A, and UST-61

August 2, 2022

M.M. Fowler, Inc.
Attention: Marvin L. Barnes, Jr. – Registered Agent
4220 Neal Road
Durham, NC 27705-2322

Re: Notice of Regulatory Requirements
15A NCAC 2L .0404 and 2L .0405 
Risk-based Assessment and Corrective Action for
Commercial Petroleum Underground Storage Tanks

Coliseum BP #185
2036 Gillespie St., Fayetteville
Cumberland County
Incident Number: 48602
Risk Classification: Pending
Ranking: Pending
Dear Mr. Barnes, Jr:
Information received by this regional office of the Underground Storage Tank Section, Division of
Waste Management, on July 20, 2022, confirms a release or discharge from a petroleum underground
storage tank (UST) system at the above-referenced location. Records indicate that you are the owner or
operator of this UST system. Therefore, as a responsible party, you must comply with the initial response
and abatement action requirements of the Title 15A of the North Carolina Administrative Code (NCAC),
Subchapter 2L .0404 and, if applicable, the assessment and reporting requirements of Title 15A NCAC 2L
.0405, within the timeframes specified in the attached rules. (Be aware that if Title 15A NCAC 2L .0405
is applicable, you must comply with its requirements even if you do not receive formal notification from
the UST Section.)
Initial abatement action requirements include the preparation and submittal of an Initial Abatement
Action (IAA) Report, in accordance with Title 15A NCAC 2L .0404 and the most recent version of the
Guidelines for Site Checks, Tank Closure, and Initial Response and Abatement for UST Releases, within
90 days of discovery of the release.
Because a release or discharge has been confirmed, a Licensed Geologist or a Professional
Engineer, certified by the State of North Carolina, is required to prepare and certify all reports submitted to
the Department of Environmental Quality in accordance with Title 15A NCAC 2L .0103(e) and 2L
.0111(b).
Please note that before you sell, transfer, or request a “No Further Action” determination for a
property that has not been remediated to below “unrestricted use” standards, you must file a Notice of
Residual Petroleum ("Notice") with the Register of Deeds in the county where the property is located (North
Carolina General Statutes 143B-279.9 and 143B-279.11).
Failure to comply with the State's rules in the manner and time specified may result in the
assessment of civil penalties and/or the use of other enforcement mechanisms.
If you have any questions regarding trust fund eligibility or reimbursement from the Commercial
Leaking Petroleum Underground Storage Tank Cleanup Funds, please contact the UST Section Trust Fund
Branch at [phone]. If you have any questions regarding the actions that must be taken or the rules
mentioned in this letter, please contact me at the address or telephone number listed below.
Sincerely,
Liz Price
Hydrogeologist
Wilmington Regional Office
UST Section, Division of Waste Management, NCDEQ
Enclosures: Title 15A NCAC 2L .0404 and 2L .0405

cc: Dr. Jennifer Green - Director,
Cumberland County, Department Public Health
1235 Ramsey St.
Fayetteville, NC 28301

James Dodson, EMS Environmental Inc. – via email correspondence

Wilmington Regional Office | 127 Cardinal Drive Ext| Wilmington, NC 28405 | [phone]

UST-17A UST Suspected Release 24 Hour Notice
Do not use this form to report a 24 hour notice of a Pollution Incident. You must use form UST-61, 24 Hour Release and UST Leak
Reporting Form.
 This form must be used to report to DEQ, within 24 hours of discovery, a Suspected Release from any of the following:
a) Failed or inconclusive leak detection or tightness test results. This includes positive test results, such as “Increase”, which
indicates the level in the UST system has increased more than 0.2 gph.
b) Unusual operating conditions which can include, but are not limited to: the erratic behavior of dispensing equipment; the
unexplained presence of water in the tank; the presence of fuel in containment sumps or interstitial spaces; or the degradation of
any equipment or element of an underground storage tank system to the point where that equipment or element can not reasonably
be expected to perform its intended function.
c) Internal inspection results such as, perforations, corrosion holes, weld failures, or other similar defects that indicate a release
could have occurred.
 If you have more than four UST systems to report suspected releases, then attach additional sheets of the UST-17A form. You only
need to list the UST systems at your site that have suspected releases.
 Within 7 days of discovery, submit a UST-17B form to document the response activities taken to investigate the suspected release.
 Please submit this form to: NCDEQ/DWM, UST Section
1646 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1646
OR
Fax to [phone] OR [e-mail]
I. UST OWNER II. UST FACILITY
Name:
M. M. Fowler, INC
Name:
Coliseum BP 185
Facility ID:
00-0-0000012822
Address:
4220 Neal Rd
Address:
2036 Gillespie St
City:
Durham
State:
NC
Zip:
27705
City:
Fayetteville
County:
Cumberland
Person Reporting:
Craig Baker
Title of Person Reporting:
Service Project Manager (JFPG)
Telephone Number:
(919) 231-1998
Date Submitted:
6/7/2022
III. UST INFORMATION
Tank Number / Size: 1 / 6000 2 / 6000 3 / 10000 /
Product Stored: Regular1 Regular2 Premium
Location and/or source of
suspected release:
(check all that apply)
Tank
Piping
Tank Sump
Dispenser Sump
Spill Bucket
Internal Inspection
Other (Explain in
comments)
Tank
Piping
Tank Sump
Dispenser Sump
Spill Bucket
Internal Inspection
Other (Explain in
comments)
Tank
Piping
Tank Sump
Dispenser Sump
Spill Bucket
Internal Inspection
Other (Explain in
comments)
Tank
Piping
Tank Sump
Dispenser Sump
Spill Bucket
Internal Inspection
Other (Explain in
comments)
Leak detection method or
other observation that
indicates a suspected
release. (e.g., ATG, SIR,
visual contamination, fuel
in sump, etc.):
UST-23A UST-23A UST-23A
Failed/Inconclusive date or
date that leak detection
method suspected release
discovered:
5/29/2022 5/29/2022 5/29/2022
IV. COMMENTS

UST-17A Revised 10/2018 http://www.wastenotnc.org/
UST-6D/23A
Page 1
Triennial UST Spill Bucket Integrity Testing l��ltf���
(HydrostaticNacuum Test) ata Ent -----
•If any periodic test fails, a suspected release report must be submitted on a UST-17A form, UST Suspected Release 24 Hour Notice. The suspected
release must be investigated, in accordance with 15A NCAC 2N .0603, and defective equipment repaired or replaced in accordance with 15A NCAC
2N .0404/.0900. Results of the investigation must be submitted on a UST-17B form, UST Suspected Release 7 Day Notice.
•The primary containment and interstitial space of the spill bucket shall be tested in accordance with the manufacturer's written guidelines, PEI/RP100
"Recommended Practices for Installation of Underground Liquid Storage Systems" and/or PEI/RP1200 "Recommended Practices for the Testing and
Verification of Spill, Overfill, Leak Detection and Secondary Containment Equipment at UST Facilities."•The primary and secondary walls are both considered to be tested at the same time if vacuum is used to test the interstice.
UST FACILITY
Owner I Operator Name Facility Name Facility ID
MM Fowler/ Family Fare Convenience Stores Family Fare -Coliseum Bo 00-0-0000012822
Facility Street Address Facility City County2036 Gillespie St. Fayetteville CUMBERLAND
TESTING CONTRACTOR INFORMATION
Company Name I Phone I Email address JF Petroleum Group 9192311998 [e-mail]
I certify, under penalty of law, that the testing data provided on this form documents the UST system equipment was tested in accordance with the
manufacturer's guidelines and the applicable national industry standards listed in 15A NCAC 2N .406 and/or 15A NCAC 2N .0900.
Jessie Atkinson JeMU3 � Print Name of person conducting inspection Signature of person conducting inspection
05-29-2022 Test Date
Identify Spill Bucket (By Tank Number,Tank# 1 Tank# 2 Tank# 3 Tank# 4 Tank# Stored Product, etc.)
Tank Size
Product Regular 1 Regular 2 Premium Diesel
Indicate units for all measurements
Bucket Manufacturer/Model OPW OPW OPW OPW
Bucket Depth 16 16 16 16
Construction � SW □ow � SW □ ow � SW □ ow � SW □ ow □ SW □ ow
� Direct Bury � Direct Bury � Direct Bury � Direct Bury □Direct Bury
Bucket Installation Type □Direct Bury w/Liner □Direct Bury w/Liner □ Direct Bury w/Liner □ Direct Bury w/Liner □ Direct Bury w/Liner
□ Containment □ Containment □ Containment □ Containment □ Containment sumo sumo sumo sumo sumo
Test Type � Hydrostatic � Hydrostatic � Hydrostatic � Hydrostatic □Hydrostatic □Vacuum □Vacuum □Vacuum □Vacuum □Vacuum
Liquid and debris removed from spill �Yes □No �Yes □No �Yes □No �Yes □No □Yes □Nobucket?
Visual inspection (No cracks, loose parts or � Pass □Fail �Pass □Fail � Pass □Fail � Pass □Fail □Pass □ Failseparation of the bucket from the fill pipe.)
Tank riser cap included in test? � Yes □No � Yes □No � Yes □No � Yes □No D Yes □No □N/A □N/A □N/A □N/A □N/A
Drain valve included in test? D Yes □No D Yes □No D Yes □No D Yes □No D Yes □No
� N/A IE] N/A IE] N/A � N/A □ N/A
Wait time between applying vacuum/water 0 0 0 15 Mins and start of test
Primary Section Test Hydrostatic: Water level must be within 1.5 inches of top of bucket Vacuum: Apply vacuum of 30 inches WC
Begin End Test Time 1:00 2:00 1:00 2:00 1:00 2:00 1:00 2:00
Begin End Reading 15 0 15 0 15 0 15 15
Secondary Interstice Test Vacuum: Apply vacuum of 15 inches WC
Begin End Test Time ' ' ' ' '
Begin End Reading
Pass/fail criteria: Must pass visual inspection. Hydrostatic: Water level drop of less than 1/8 inch in 1 hour; Vacuum single-walled only: Maintain
at least 26 inches water column for 1 minute; Vacuum double-walled: Maintain at least 12 inches water column for 1 minute
Test Results D Pass � Fail D Pass � Fail D Pass IE] Fail � Pass 0 Fail D Pass 0 Fail
Comments -(include information on repairs made prior to testing, and recommended follow-up for failed tests)
Date next Spill Bucket integrity test due (required every 3 years)
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, DIVISION OF WASTE MANAGEMENT, UST SECTION 5/2020 1646 MAIL SERVICE CENTER, RALEIGH, NC 27699-1646 PHONE [phone] FAX [phone] httg://www.wastenotnc.org/
UST-61 24-Hour Release and UST Leak Reporting Form.
For Releases
in NC
This form should be completed and submitted to the UST Section’s regional office following a known or suspected release from an underground storage tank (UST) system. This form is required to be submitted within 24 hours of discovery of a known or
suspected release
(DWM USE ONLY) Incident # ________ Risk (H,I,L,U)_______ Received On ________ Received By ________
Reported by (circle one): Phone, Fax or Report Region _______
Suspected Contamination? (Y/N) ________ Confirmed GW Contamination? (Y/N) ______ Confirmed Soil Contamination ?(Y/N) ______
Samples Taken?(Y/N) ______ Free Product? (Y/N) _____ If Yes, State Greatest Thickness ______________
Facility ID Number ______________ Date Leak Discovered ___________ Comm/Non-Commercial? ________
Reg/Non-regulated? _____________
INCIDENT DESCRIPTION
Incident Name:
Address: County:
City/Town: Zip Code: Regional Office (circle one): Asheville, Mooresville, Fayetteville, Raleigh, Washington, Wilmington, Winston-Salem
Latitude (decimal degrees): Longitude (decimal degrees) : Obtained by:
Briefly describe suspected or confirmed release: (including but not limited to: nature of release, date of release, amount
of release, amount of free product present and recovery efforts, initial responses conducted, impacts to receptors)  GPS
 Topographic map
 GIS Address matching
 Other
 Unknown
Describe location:
HOW RELEASE WAS DISCOVERED (Release Code)
(Check one)
 Release Detection Equipment or Methods
 During UST Closure/Removal
 Property Transfer
 Visual/Odor
 Water in Tank
 Water Supply Well Contamination
 Groundwater Contamination
 Surface Water Contamination
 Other (specify) _______________
SOURCE OF CONTAMINATION
Source of Release (Check primary source) Cause of Release (Check primary cause) Type of Release (Check one) Product Type Released (Check primary product type released)
 Tank
 Piping
 Dispenser
 Submersible Turbine Pump
 Delivery Problem
 Spill Bucket
 Other
 Unknown
Definitions presented on reverse
 Spill
 Overfill
 Corrosion
 Physical/Mechanical
Damage
 Install Problem
 Other
 Unknown
Definitions presented on reverse
 Petroleum
 Non-Petroleum
 Both
Location
(Check one)
 Facility
 Residence
 Other
 Gasoline/ Diesel/
Kerosene
 Heating Oil
 Other Petroleum
Products
 Metals
 Other Inorganics
 Other Organics
 Diesel/Veg. Oil
Blend
 Vegetable Oil 100%
 E10 – E20
 E21 – E84
 E85 – E99
 Ethanol 100%
 E01 – E09
Ownership
1.Municipal 2. Military 3. Unknown 4. Private 5. Federal 6. County 7. State
Operation Type 1.Public Service 2. Agricultural 3. Residential 4. Education/Relig. 5. Industrial 6. Commercial 7. Mining
UST Form 61 (02/19) Page 1 of 2
YN
YYN
00-0-0000012822
7/19/2022Commercial
Regulated
Coliseum Family Fare BP #185
2036 Gillespie Street Cumberland
Fayetteville 28306
35.020607 -78.895919
X
A site check was performed 7/7/22 at the spill buckets for two regular gasoline USTs and the premium gasoline UST due to failed
hydrostatic tests. Soil samples were obtained from adjacent to each spill bucket and submitted for laboratory analyses. Soil sample
results received on 7/19/22 for Gasoline Range Organics (GRO) indicated a release at both of the regular gasoline locations. The
premium gasoline location had detectable GRO concentrations but less than the Soil Action level of 50 mg/Kg. See attached table.
X
X
X
X
X
X
IMPACT ON DRINKING WATER SUPPLIES
Water Supply Wells Affected? 1. Yes 2. No 3.Unknown
Number of Water Supply Wells Affected __________________
Water Supply Wells Contaminated: (Include Users Names, Addresses and Phone Numbers. Attach additional sheet if necessary)
1. 2. 3.
UST SYSTEM OWNER UST Owner/Company
Point of Contact Address
City State Zip Code Telephone Number
UST SYSTEM OPERATOR
UST Operator/Company Address
City State Zip Code Telephone Number
LANDOWNER AT LOCATION OF UST INCIDENT
Landowner Address
City State Zip Code Telephone Number
Draw Sketch of Area (showing two major road intersections) or Attach Map
Person Reporting Incident Company Telephone Number
Title Address Date
UST Form 61 (02/19) Page 2 of 2
Definitions of Sources Tank: means the tank that stores the product and is part of the underground storage tank system Piping: means the piping and connectors running from the tank or submersible turbine pump to the dispenser or other end-use equipment (Vent, vapor recovery, or fill lines are excluded.) Dispenser: includes the dispenser and the equipment used to connect the dispenser to the piping (e.g., a release from a suction pump or from components located above the shear valve) Submersible Turbine Pump (STP) Area includes the submersible turbine pump head (typically located in the tank sump), the line leak detector, and the piping that connects the submersible turbine pump to the tank Delivery Problem: identifies releases that occurred during product delivery to the tank. (Typical causes associated with this source are spills and overfills.)
Other: serves as the option to use when the release source is known but does not fit into one of the preceding categories (e.g., for releases from vent lines, vapor recovery lines, and fill lines) Unknown: identifies releases for which the source has not been determined
Definitions of Causes
Spill: use this cause when a spill occurs (e.g., when the delivery hose is disconnected from the tank fill pipe or when the nozzle is removed from the dispenser) Overfill: use when an overfill occurs (e.g., overfills may occur from the fill pipe at the tank or when the nozzle fails to shut off at the dispenser) Physical or Mechanical Damage: use for all types of physical or mechanical damage, except corrosion (e.g., puncture of tank or piping, loose fittings, broken components, and components that have changed dimension) Corrosion: use when a metal tank, piping, or other component has a release due to corrosion (e.g., for steel, corrosion takes the form of rust) Installation Problem: use when the problem is determined to have occurred specifically because the UST system was not installed properly Other: use this option when the cause is known but does not fit into one of the preceding categories (e.g., putting regulated substances into monitoring wells) Unknown: use when the cause has not been determined
M.M. Fowler, Inc.
Dr. M.L. Barnes, Jr.
Durham NC
4220 Neal Road
27705 919-309-2925
SAME AS ABOVE
SAME AS ABOVE
SEE ATTACHED MAPS
James Dodson, L.G.
Sr. Project Manager
EMS Environmental, Inc.
117 S. Hoover Road, Durham, NC 27703 7/20/2022
919-596-0470
SCALE IN FEET
1,000 FEET RADIUS
APPROXIMATE
0
500
1000 2000
FIGURE 1: SITE TOPOGRAPHIC VICINITY MAP
COLESIUM FAMILY FARE BP #185
2036 GILLESPIE STREET, FAYETTEVILLE, CUMBERLAND COUNTY, NC 28306
DATE: 7/20/2022
DRAWN BY: JJD
EMS PROJ. 7889
PORTION OF FAYETTEVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA 7.5 MINUTE SERIES USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAPS (2019)
SITELOCATION
NEXPLANATION0.02040 80APPROXIMATE SCALEIN FEETFIGURE 3: SITE MAP WITH SOIL BORING LOCATIONSCOLISEUM FAMILY FARE BP #1852036 GILLESPIE STREET, FAYETTEVILLE, CUMBERLAND COUNTY, NC 28306MODIFIED BY: JJDDATE: 7/20/2022PROJECT NO: 7889SS-1SS-1SS-2SS-3IMAGE DATE JULY 2017 FROM GOOGLE EARTH CORE DRILL SOIL SAMPLE LOCATION
DATE: 7/2022Incident Number/Name:SampleGRO DROSample Sample Depth Sample PID Field Screening EPA 5030 EPA 3550ID Date (feet) Type Conc. In ppm Conc. in mg/Kg Conc. in mg/KgSS-1 7-Jul-22 1.5 - 2.0 Site Check UST-1A 381.98,000NSSS-2 7-Jul-22 1.5 - 2.0 Site Check UST-2A 347.82,600NSSS-3 7-Jul-22 1.5 - 2.0 Site Check UST-3A 385.9 32 NSNCDEQ Action Level50 mg/Kg 100 mg/KgNotes: 1.) NS denotes Not Sampled for that analysis. 2.) BRL denotes not detected above the reporting limit stated on analytical report.3.) Bold font on sample result indicates exceedance of 50/100 mg/Kg NCDEQ Action Level for GRO/DRO. 4.) ppm denotes parts per million.Unassigned/ Coliseum FF #185Table 3. EPA 5030 (GRO) and 3550 (DRO) Soil Analytical Results SummaryM.M. Fowler, Inc. : Coliseum Family Fare BP #185Facility ID No. 00-0-00000128222036 Gillespie Street, Fayetteville, Cumberland County, North Carolina 28306EMS Project No. 7889Page 1 of 1

APPENDIX B

Description of Zoning Districts

201
2227
2931
208
2921
2965
217
211
216
2229
2956
2231
164
118
131
158
2303
125
130
128
168
2025
120
2309
3060
2966
200 2036
206
3066
3000
175
3081
3049
2302
2969
2035
2001
2201
305
303
308
304
307 215309
2203
2026
213
312
2024
306
300
217
2017 2010
224 2016
220 110
2067
216
NEW YEAR WOMBLE
CARL COX
CANADY & KINLAW
HELENA S PERRY
CCGIS \ ESRI Charlotte, CCGIS, CC Planning & City of
0 0.04 0.070.02 mi
THE COUNTY OF CUMBERLAND AND ITS GIS DEPARTMENT DISCLAIMSACCOUNTABILITY FOR THIS PRODUCT AND MAKES NO WARRANTY
EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED CONCERNING THE ACCURACY THEREOF.RESPONSIBILITY FOR INTERPRETATION OF THIS PRODUCT LIES WITH
THE USER.
Parcels
Addresses
Buildings
Subdivisions
City Limits
Fayetteville
Zoning
Cumberland County Zoning
C(P),C(P),
C3,C3,
HS(P),HS(P),
M(P),M(P),
O&I(P),O&I(P),
R6,R6,
R6A,R6A,
Current Time: 10/10/2022 1:06 PM
10/3/22, 7:46 AM Zoning Regulations | Fayetteville, NC
https://www.fayettevillenc.gov/city-services/development-services/planning-zoning/udo-administrative-manual/zoning-regulations 1/3
Zoning Regulations

Purpose of Zoning Regulations
Zoning regulations establish the type and intensity of land uses allowed in various areas of the City. The intent behind zoning regulations is to enhance compatibility between various
land uses and to match land uses with the public and private infrastructure necessary to support those uses. For instance, heavy industrial uses are usually located away from homes and
neighborhoods to keep noise and odors associated with industrial operations from creating problems for residents. Likewise, large commercial facilities are generally located on major
roadways in order to accommodate the heavy traffic that these facilities generate.
Zoning Map and Zoning Districts
The official City of Fayetteville Zoning Map divides the City into districts of various types, ranging from the Conservation District which allows only limited development in order to
protect environmentally sensitive lands to the Heavy Industrial district which allows very intensive manufacturing and distribution type uses. The City of Fayetteville has three special
base zoning districts, five residential base zoning districts, nine business base zoning districts, three planned development districts, and 11 overlay zoning districts. Additionally, any
base zoning district may be considered as a conditional zoning district that allows additional conditions to be applied to development within such districts regarding uses, intensity of
development, and dimensional requirements to promote particular types of development or to encourage compatibility with surrounding uses. Except for conditional zoning districts,
each district is described briefly below.
Zoning District
Name AbbreviationDescription
Special Base Zoning Districts
Conservation
District CD
Preserves and protects identiable natural resources
from urban encroachment. Discourages development
that creates risk for loss of life or property from
normal or natural processes and events in natural
hazard areas like oodplains.
Agricultural –
Residential
District
AR
Accommodates rural uses, including agricultural uses
and agriculturally-supportive uses, as well as low-
density residential uses.
Military/Airport
District MA
Identies those lands within the City containing
military installations and the Fayetteville Regional
Airport.
Residential Base Zoning Districts
Single-Family
Residential 15
District
SF-15
Accommodates single-family detached residential
development at low densities (15,000 square-foot
minimum lot size), as well as small-scale multi-family
dwellings. Also allowed are complementary uses such
as parks, open space, schools, and places of worship.
Single-Family
Residential 10
District
SF-10
Accommodates single-family detached residential
development at low densities (10,000 square-foot
minimum lot size), as well as small-scale multi-family
dwellings. Also allowed are complementary uses such
as parks, open space, schools, and places of worship.
Single-Family
Residential 6
District
SF-6
Accommodates single-family detached residential
development at moderate densities (6,000 square-
foot minimum lot size), as well as small-scale multi-
family dwellings. Larger scale multi-family
developments are allowed with special use permits.
Also allowed are complementary uses such as parks,
open space, schools, and places of worship.
Mixed Residential
5 District MR-5
Accommodates a wide variety of residential housing
types at moderate to high densities. Also allowed are
complementary institutional uses (places of worship,
post ofces, police substations), day care facilities, and
limited small-scale neighborhood oriented
convenience retail uses.
Manufactured
Home District MH Accommodates manufactured home parks.
Business Base Zoning Districts
Ofce &
Institutional
District
OI
Accommodates a mix of small-scale, low-intensity
professional business ofces installations, along with
limited service uses and low to moderate density
residential uses.
10/3/22, 7:46 AM Zoning Regulations | Fayetteville, NC
https://www.fayettevillenc.gov/city-services/development-services/planning-zoning/udo-administrative-manual/zoning-regulations 2/3
Neighborhood
Commercial
District
NC
Accommodates small-scale low-intensity
“convenience” type retail and service uses to serve the
needs of the immediately surrounding
neighborhoods. Residential uses are encouraged on
the upper oors of nonresidential establishments.
Limited
Commercial
District
LC
Accommodates a range of moderate-intensity
general retail, business and service uses that serve
groups of neighborhoods, such as grocery stores,
drugstores, large restaurants, gas stations and
specialty retail stores. Residential uses are
encouraged on the upper oors of nonresidential
establishments.
Community
Commercial
District
CC
Accommodates a diverse range of medium to high
intensity retail, service and ofce uses that serve the
general community and region. Higher density
residential uses are encouraged on the upper oors of
nonresidential establishments or exist as stand-alone
buildings.
Mixed-Use District MU
Promotes the coordinated development of a
compatible and balanced mix of mutually supporting,
living, working, shopping, educating, entertaining
and recreating uses.
Downtown
District DT
Promotes the urban form and architectural character
found in traditional downtown areas in a diverse
mixed-use urban center environment.
Light Industrial
District LI
Accommodates light manufacturing, assembly,
fabrication, processing, distribution, storage, research
and development, and other industrial uses that are
small-scale in nature and have minimal adverse
environmental and visual impacts.
Heavy Industrial
District HI
Accommodates heavy manufacturing, assembly,
fabrication, processing, distribution, storage, research
and development, and other industrial uses that are
large-scale in nature and may have the potential for
adverse environmental and visual impacts.
Business Park
District BP
Provides for large-scale “campus” type development
containing “core” uses that include light and heavy
industrial, research and development, corporate
headquarters, ofce-warehouse, assembly, business
incubation, and vocational and training school uses,
along with supportive uses that include general ofce,
visitor accommodation, restaurant and retail uses.
Planned Development Zoning Districts
Planned
Development –
Residential
District
PD-R
Encourages the use of innovative and creative site
and building design to provide a mix of different
residential uses in close proximity to one another.
Planned
Development –
Employment
Center District
PD-EC
Encourages the development of a mix of employment
generating uses such as ofces, research, light
industrial, and limited commercial uses, and may
include high-density residential uses in appropriate
locations.
Planned
Development –
Traditional
Neighborhood
District
PD-TN
Provides an opportunity to develop mixed-use,
traditional neighborhoods as an alternative to
conventional suburban residential development.
Overlay Zoning Districts
Hospital Area
Overlay District HAO
Provides for compatible quality development in the
vicinity of the Cape Fear Valley Hospital by lessening
conicts between residential and nonresidential land
uses.
Historic/Landmark
Overlay District HLO
Protects and promotes the historic heritage of the city
by maintaining and enhancing historic and
architecturally valuable structures, properties, districts
and neighborhoods.
10/3/22, 7:46 AM Zoning Regulations | Fayetteville, NC
https://www.fayettevillenc.gov/city-services/development-services/planning-zoning/udo-administrative-manual/zoning-regulations 3/3
Manufactured
Home Overlay
District
MHO Accommodates the placement of manufactured
homes in the city in accordance with City-adopted
plans and local housing needs.
Noise – Accident
Potential Overlay
District
NPO
Intends to reduce the concentration of people
exposed to high noise levels and aircraft accidents
associated with airports and military installations.
Airport Overlay
District APO
Protects the public by minimizing exposure to and
giving public notice of probable high noise levels and
accident hazards generated by airport operations at
the Fayetteville Regional Airport
Special Highway
Overlay District
SHO To be determined.
Murchison Road
Corridor Overlay
District
MCO To be determined.
Neighborhood
Conservation
Overlay District
NCO
Protects and preserves unique design features and
character of established neighborhoods throughout
the City by promoting new construction that is
compatible with existing neighborhood character.
Cape Fear River
Overlay District CFO To be determined.
Coliseum Tourism
Overlay CTO
Establishes and maintains the Coliseum as a
contemporary, vibrant retail area that is harmonious
with itsevents.
Regional Activity
Center RACO
Supports areas that demonstrate a common,
economically signicant contribution to the
community, focusing on compatibility between
existing and future uses in type, scale, and character
and by promoting compatibility with nearby uses.
Suburban Activity
Center SACO
Facilitates inll development and redevelopment in
key areas along arterial road corridors to create or
reinforce centers of primarily mixed-use activity.
Conditional
Zoning CZ
Allows an applicant to submit a request to amend the
zoning district designation of land on the Zoning
Map, subject to a set of additional voluntary
limitations or conditions.

Types of Uses
Permitted uses are land uses which are allowed by right in a particular zoning district. Special uses are uses which are allowed only after a public hearing process is followed.
Prohibited uses are not allowed in the zoning districts in which they are not listed. Section 30-4.B provides a description and examples of the uses typical of each use category; this
section is used to help identify where a new or unlisted use should be placed. The Use Table (http://online.encodeplus.com/regs/fayetteville-nc/doc-viewer.aspx#secid-11250) serves
as a quick reference as to which uses are permitted, which are special uses, and which are prohibited uses. Some permitted uses have special requirements; the Use Table includes
section references which allow the reader to determine what these special requirements are.
Principal and Accessory Uses
The land uses described in the Use Table are principal uses, or, in other words, the dominant land use on a parcel of property. Accessory uses are subordinate land uses that support
principal uses. For example, on a lot in a single family residential zoning district, a house would be the principal use, while a backyard storage shed would be an accessory use. Section
30-4.D of the UDO (http://online.encodeplus.com/regs/fayetteville-nc/doc-viewer.aspx#secid-10435) provides a list of accessory uses and the standards which apply to them.
Additional Information
Planning & Zoning Division, Zoning Section- Applications & Staff Contact Information

APPENDIX C

Adjacent Property Descriptions
10/10/22, 12:42 PM Print Property Info
https://taxpwa.co.cumberland.nc.us/camapwa/PrintPRC.aspx?PARCELPK=75476 1/3
Cumberland County Property Record Card
Property Summary
Tax Year: 2022
Building Summary
REID 0436121424000 PIN 0436-12-1424 Property Owner M M FOWLER
INC
Location
Address
2036 GILLESPIE
ST Property
Description
M M FOWLER INC LO1 SE01
PL0129-0018 Owner's Mailing
Address
4220 NEAL RD
DURHAM NC
27705
Administrative Data
Plat Book & Page 0129-0018
Old Map #
Market Area 8020
Township NONE
Planning Jurisdiction COUNTY
City FAYETTEVILLE
Fire District
Spec District
Land Class C357-SHOP/RE
History REID 1
History REID 2
Acreage 1.47
Permit Date
Permit #
Transfer Information
Deed Date 5/31/1990
Deed Book 003583
Deed Page 00317
Revenue Stamps $185
Package Sale Date
Package Sale Price
Land Sale Date 5/31/1990
Land Sale Price $185,000
Improvement Summary
Total Buildings 1
Total Units 0
Total Living Area 0
Total Gross Leasable Area 1,800
Property Value
Total Appraised Land Value $235,130
Total Appraised Building Value $218,780
Total Appraised Misc
Improvements Value
$29,604
Total Cost Value $483,514
Total Appraised Value - Valued
By Cost
$483,514
Other Exemptions
Exemption Desc
Use Value Deferred
Historic Value Deferred
Total Deferred Value
Total Taxable Value $483,514
Card 1 2036 GILLESPIE ST
Building Details
Bldg Name
Primary Occupancy Type COMMERCIAL
Primary Occupancy CVC-CONVENIENCE-STOR
Primary Class S-PRE-ENG-STEEL-FRAM
Primary Quality C+
Year Built 1998
Effective Year 1998
Physical Depreciation (Rating)AVERAGE
Physical Depreciation (% Bad)25
Economic Depreciation (% Bad)0
Functional Depreciation (% Bad)0
Gross Leasable Area (SQFT)1,800
Remodeled Year 0
Total Stories 1
Building Total & Improvement Details
Total Adjusted Replacement Cost
New
$262,800
Physical Depreciation (% Bad)AVERAGE
25
Depreciated Value $197,100
Economic Depreciation (% Bad)0
Functional Depreciation (% Bad)0
Total Depreciated Value $197,100
Market Area Factor 1
Building Value $218,780
Misc Improvements Value $29,604
Total Improvement Value $248,384
Assessed Land Value $235,130
Assessed Total Value $483,514
SITE
10/10/22, 12:42 PM Print Property Info
https://taxpwa.co.cumberland.nc.us/camapwa/PrintPRC.aspx?PARCELPK=75476 2/3
Misc Improvements Summary
Addition Summary
Story Type Code Area
1.00 CNPY COMM GOOD CCB 4773
Section 1 Details
Occupancy
Type
COMMERCIAL
2-FIX-BATHS 1
3-FIX-BATHS 1
Air
Conditioning
Y
Class S-PRE-ENG-STEEL-
FRAM
Depreciation 25%
Depreciation AVERAGE
Exterior Walls 39-PRE-ENG-PANEL-S
Interior Finish CVC-CONVENIENCE-
STOR
Occupancy CVC-CONVENIENCE-
STOR
Quality C+
Sprinkler N
Building Sketch Photograph
Card
#
Unit
Quantity Measure Type Base
Price
Eff
Year
Phys Depr
(% Bad)
Econ Depr
(% Bad)
Funct Depr
(% Bad)
Common Interest
(% Good)Value
1 530 SIZE CL FENCE $8.61 1983 65 0 0 $1,597
1 40x20 DIMENSIONS IMP-POLE
SHED
$398.81 1983 65 0 0 $2,280
1 14500 SIZE CONCRETE
PAV
$4.04 1998 65 0 0 $20,503
Total Misc Improvements Value Assessed: $29,604
10/10/22, 12:42 PM Print Property Info
https://taxpwa.co.cumberland.nc.us/camapwa/PrintPRC.aspx?PARCELPK=75476 3/3
Land Summary
Ownership History
Notes Summary
Card
#
Unit
Quantity Measure Type Base
Price
Eff
Year
Phys Depr
(% Bad)
Econ Depr
(% Bad)
Funct Depr
(% Bad)
Common Interest
(% Good)Value
1 5100 SIZE ASPHALT
PAVING
$2.22 1998 55 0 0 $3,270
1 8x8 DIMENSIONS GAZEBO $28.91 1998 55 0 0 $833
1 20x4 DIMENSIONS SIDEWALK $4.04 1998 75 0 0 $81
1 70 SIZE CL FENCE $8.61 2016 10 0 0 $1,040
Total Misc Improvements Value Assessed: $29,604
Zoning Soil
Class Description Size Rate Size Adj.
Factor
Land
Adjustment Land Value
CC 1096-COMM-SQ-
FOOTAG
64033.20 SQUARE FOOT
PRICED
$4 $235,130
Total Land Value Assessed: $235,130
Land Class: C357-SHOP/RE Deeded Acres: 0 Calculated Acres: 1.37
Owner Name Deed Type % Ownership Stamps Sale Price Book Page Deed Date
Current M M FOWLER INC WD-WARRANTY DEED 100 185 $185,000 003583 00317 5/31/1990
1 Back BP OIL INC WD-WARRANTY DEED 100 416.5 $416,500 003048 00515 2/4/1985
Building Card Date Line Notes
No Data
10/10/22, 12:49 PM Print Property Info
https://taxpwa.co.cumberland.nc.us/camapwa/PrintPRC.aspx?PARCELPK=75158 1/2
Cumberland County Property Record Card
Property Summary
Tax Year: 2022
Building Summary
Misc Improvements Summary
REID 0436039029000 PIN 0436-03-9029 Property Owner ALHOBISHI, FADHI
Location
Address
110 W
JENKINS ST Property
Description
MARY WILLIAMS MITCHELL RECOMB LOA
SE01 PL0096-0093 Owner's Mailing
Address
6501 BARBOUR
LAKE RD
FAYETTEVILLE NC
28306
Administrative Data
Plat Book & Page 0096-0093
Old Map #
Market Area 2718
Township NONE
Planning Jurisdiction COUNTY
City FAYETTEVILLE
Fire District
Spec District
Land Class U112-COMMUNI
History REID 1
History REID 2
Acreage 4.48
Permit Date
Permit #
Transfer Information
Deed Date 4/5/2013
Deed Book 009156
Deed Page 00202
Revenue Stamps
Package Sale Date
Package Sale Price
Land Sale Date 4/5/2013
Land Sale Price
Improvement Summary
Total Buildings 0
Total Units 0
Total Living Area 0
Total Gross Leasable Area 0
Property Value
Total Appraised Land Value $142,105
Total Appraised Building Value
Total Appraised Misc
Improvements Value
Total Cost Value $142,105
Total Appraised Value - Valued
By Cost
$142,105
Other Exemptions
Exemption Desc
Use Value Deferred
Historic Value Deferred
Total Deferred Value
Total Taxable Value $142,105
Photograph
Card
#
Unit
Quantity Measure Type Base
Price
Eff
Year
Phys Depr (%
Bad)
Econ Depr (%
Bad)
Funct Depr (%
Bad)
Common Interest (%
Good)Value
No Data
Total Misc Improvements Value Assessed:
ADJACENT PROPERTY - NORTH #1
10/10/22, 12:49 PM Print Property Info
https://taxpwa.co.cumberland.nc.us/camapwa/PrintPRC.aspx?PARCELPK=75158 2/2
Land Summary
Ownership History
Notes Summary
Zoning Soil
Class Description Size Rate Size Adj.
Factor
Land
Adjustment
Land
Value
CC 1096-COMM-SQ-
FOOTAG
13068.00 SQUARE FOOT
PRICED
$1.5 1.51 SHAPE-75.00 $11,100
SF6 1800-CELL-TOWER-
SITE
1.00 BY THE UNIT PRICE $100,000 $100,000
SF6 2096-RURAL-ACREAGE 3.18 BY THE ACRE PRICE $13,000 $31,005
Total Land Value Assessed: $142,105
Land Class: U112-COMMUNI Deeded Acres: 4.48 Calculated Acres: 4.48
Owner Name Deed Type % Ownership Stamps Sale Price Book Page Deed Date
Current ALHOBISHI, FADHI AF-AFFIDAVIT 100 0 009156 00202 4/5/2013
1 Back ALHOBISHI, FADHI WD-WARRANTY DEED 100 0 009156 00195 4/5/2013
2 Back CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE WD-WARRANTY DEED 100 3 $1,500 004040 00310 10/14/1993
3 Back GULF OIL CORP AG-AGREEMENT DEED 100 0 000867 00382 12/1/1960
Building Card Date Line Notes
No Data
10/10/22, 12:54 PM Print Property Info
https://taxpwa.co.cumberland.nc.us/camapwa/PrintPRC.aspx?PARCELPK=75477 1/2
Cumberland County Property Record Card
Property Summary
Tax Year: 2022
Building Summary
Misc Improvements Summary
REID 0436121696000 PIN 0436-12-1696 Property Owner ALHOBISHI, FADHL
Location
Address
2026
GILLESPIE ST Property
Description
CANADY & KINLAW LOLTS 21-22 SE01
PL0011-0017 Owner's Mailing
Address
6501 BARBOUR
LAKE RD
FAYETTEVILLE NC
28306
Administrative Data
Plat Book & Page 0011-0017
Old Map #
Market Area 8043
Township NONE
Planning Jurisdiction COUNTY
City FAYETTEVILLE
Fire District
Spec District
Land Class C100-COMMERC
History REID 1
History REID 2
Acreage 0.12
Permit Date
Permit #
Transfer Information
Deed Date 1/9/2012
Deed Book 008805
Deed Page 00171
Revenue Stamps
Package Sale Date
Package Sale Price
Land Sale Date 1/9/2012
Land Sale Price
Improvement Summary
Total Buildings 0
Total Units 0
Total Living Area 0
Total Gross Leasable Area 0
Property Value
Total Appraised Land Value $6,180
Total Appraised Building Value
Total Appraised Misc
Improvements Value
Total Cost Value $6,180
Total Appraised Value - Valued By
Cost
$6,180
Other Exemptions
Exemption Desc
Use Value Deferred
Historic Value Deferred
Total Deferred Value
Total Taxable Value $6,180
Photograph
Card
#
Unit
Quantity Measure Type Base
Price
Eff
Year
Phys Depr (%
Bad)
Econ Depr (%
Bad)
Funct Depr (%
Bad)
Common Interest (%
Good)Value
No Data
Total Misc Improvements Value Assessed:
ADJACENT PROPERTY - NORTH #2
10/10/22, 12:54 PM Print Property Info
https://taxpwa.co.cumberland.nc.us/camapwa/PrintPRC.aspx?PARCELPK=75477 2/2
Land Summary
Ownership History
Notes Summary
Zoning Soil
Class Description Size Rate Size Adj.
Factor Land Adjustment Land Value
CC 1096-COMM-SQ-
FOOTAG
5227.20 SQUARE FOOT
PRICED
$1.5 1.55 $6,180
Total Land Value Assessed: $6,180
Land Class: C100-COMMERC Deeded Acres: 0 Calculated Acres: 0.1
Owner Name Deed Type % Ownership Stamps Sale Price Book Page Deed Date
Current ALHOBISHI, FADHL WD-WARRANTY DEED 100 0 008805 00171 1/9/2012
1 Back DAVIS, J J WD-WARRANTY DEED 100 0 002307 00465 7/1/1984
Building Card Date Line Notes
No Data
10/10/22, 12:55 PM Print Property Info
https://taxpwa.co.cumberland.nc.us/camapwa/PrintPRC.aspx?PARCELPK=75483 1/2
Cumberland County Property Record Card
Property Summary
Tax Year: 2022
Building Summary
Misc Improvements Summary
REID 0436122771000 PIN 0436-12-2771 Property Owner ALHOBISHI, FADHL
Location
Address
2024
GILLESPIE ST Property
Description
CANADY & KINLAW LO16-20 SE01
PL0011-0017 Owner's Mailing
Address
6501 BARBOUR
LAKE RD
FAYETTEVILLE NC
28306
Administrative Data
Plat Book & Page 0011-0017
Old Map #
Market Area 8020
Township NONE
Planning Jurisdiction COUNTY
City FAYETTEVILLE
Fire District
Spec District
Land Class C100-COMMERC
History REID 1
History REID 2
Acreage 0.66
Permit Date
Permit #
Transfer Information
Deed Date 1/9/2012
Deed Book 008805
Deed Page 00171
Revenue Stamps
Package Sale Date
Package Sale Price
Land Sale Date 1/9/2012
Land Sale Price
Improvement Summary
Total Buildings 0
Total Units 0
Total Living Area 0
Total Gross Leasable Area 0
Property Value
Total Appraised Land Value $118,448
Total Appraised Building Value
Total Appraised Misc
Improvements Value
Total Cost Value $118,448
Total Appraised Value - Valued
By Cost
$118,448
Other Exemptions
Exemption Desc
Use Value Deferred
Historic Value Deferred
Total Deferred Value
Total Taxable Value $118,448
Photograph
Card
#
Unit
Quantity Measure Type Base
Price
Eff
Year
Phys Depr (%
Bad)
Econ Depr (%
Bad)
Funct Depr (%
Bad)
Common Interest (%
Good)Value
No Data
Total Misc Improvements Value Assessed:
ADJACENT PROPERTY - NORTH #3
10/10/22, 12:55 PM Print Property Info
https://taxpwa.co.cumberland.nc.us/camapwa/PrintPRC.aspx?PARCELPK=75483 2/2
Land Summary
Ownership History
Notes Summary
Zoning Soil
Class Description Size Rate Size Adj.
Factor
Land
Adjustment Land Value
CC 1096-COMM-SQ-
FOOTAG
28749.60 SQUARE FOOT
PRICED
$4 $118,448
Total Land Value Assessed: $118,448
Land Class: C100-COMMERC Deeded Acres: 0 Calculated Acres: 0.3
Owner Name Deed Type % Ownership Stamps Sale Price Book Page Deed Date
Current ALHOBISHI, FADHL WD-WARRANTY DEED 100 0 008805 00171 1/9/2012
Building Card Date Line Notes
No Data
10/10/22, 12:56 PM Print Property Info
https://taxpwa.co.cumberland.nc.us/camapwa/PrintPRC.aspx?PARCELPK=75499 1/11
Cumberland County Property Record Card
Property Summary
Tax Year: 2022
Building Summary
REID 0436127651000 PIN 0436-12-7651 Property Owner ASSOC SERV CORP T/A
AMBASSADOR INN
Location
Address
2025 S
EASTERN BLVD
Property
Description
QUALITY INN AMBASSADOR
(4.1 ACS)
Owner's Mailing
Address
PO BOX 64102
FAYETTEVILLE NC 28306
Administrative Data
Plat Book & Page
Old Map #
Market Area 8020H
Township NONE
Planning Jurisdiction COUNTY
City FAYETTEVILLE
Fire District
Spec District
Land Class H103-HOTEL/M
History REID 1
History REID 2
Acreage 4.1
Permit Date
Permit #
Transfer Information
Deed Date 1/1/1900
Deed Book 000000
Deed Page 00000
Revenue Stamps
Package Sale Date
Package Sale Price
Land Sale Date
Land Sale Price
Improvement Summary
Total Buildings 6
Total Units 0
Total Living Area 0
Total Gross Leasable Area 29,159
Property Value
Total Appraised Land Value $340,047
Total Appraised Building
Value
$1,305,657
Total Appraised Misc
Improvements Value
$99,783
Total Cost Value $1,745,487
Total Income Value $1,878,900
Total Appraised Value - Valued
By Income
$1,878,900
Other Exemptions
Exemption Desc
Use Value Deferred
Historic Value Deferred
Total Deferred Value
Total Taxable Value $1,878,900
Card 1 2025 S EASTERN BLVD
Building Details
Bldg Name
Primary Occupancy Type COMMERCIAL
Primary Occupancy OFH-OFF-SPACE-HOTEL
Primary Class C-CONCRT/MASONRY-WLS
Primary Quality C
Year Built 1954
Effective Year 1975
Physical Depreciation (Rating)AVERAGE
Physical Depreciation (% Bad)56
Economic Depreciation (% Bad)0
Functional Depreciation (% Bad)0
Gross Leasable Area (SQFT)1,938
Remodeled Year 0
Total Stories 1
Building Total & Improvement Details
Total Adjusted Replacement Cost
New
$210,545
Physical Depreciation (% Bad)AVERAGE
56
Depreciated Value $92,640
Economic Depreciation (% Bad)0
Functional Depreciation (% Bad)0
Total Depreciated Value $92,640
Market Area Factor 1
Building Value $92,640
Misc Improvements Value $99,783
Total Improvement Value $192,423
Assessed Land Value $340,047
Assessed Total Value $1,878,900
Section 1 Details
ADJACENT PROPERTY - EAST
10/10/22, 12:56 PM Print Property Info
https://taxpwa.co.cumberland.nc.us/camapwa/PrintPRC.aspx?PARCELPK=75499 2/11
Card 2 2025 S EASTERN BLVD
Addition Summary
Story Type Code Area
1.00 CNPY COMM AVG CCC 408
1.00 CNPY COMM AVG CCC 500
1.00 CNPY COMM AVG CCC 198
Occupancy
Type
COMMERCIAL
2-FIX-BATHS 1
3-FIX-BATHS 3
Air
Conditioning
Y
Class C-CONCRT/MASONRY-
WLS
Depreciation AVERAGE
Depreciation 56%
Exterior Walls 04-VINYL-SIDING
Exterior Walls 10-BRK-VEN/CON-
BLOCK
Exterior Walls 18-UNFIN/PARTY-WALL
Interior Finish MTC-MOTEL
Interior Finish OFH-OFF-SPACE-
HOTEL
Occupancy OFH-OFF-SPACE-
HOTEL
Quality C
Sprinkler N
Building Sketch Photograph
Building Details
Bldg Name
Building Total & Improvement Details
Total Adjusted Replacement Cost New $831,119
10/10/22, 12:56 PM Print Property Info
https://taxpwa.co.cumberland.nc.us/camapwa/PrintPRC.aspx?PARCELPK=75499 3/11
Addition Summary
Story Type Code Area
1.00 CNPY COMM AVG CCC 2632
Primary Occupancy Type COMMERCIAL
Primary Occupancy MTC-MOTEL
Primary Class C-CONCRT/MASONRY-WLS
Primary Quality C
Year Built 1954
Effective Year 1975
Physical Depreciation (Rating)AVERAGE
Physical Depreciation (% Bad)56
Economic Depreciation (% Bad)0
Functional Depreciation (% Bad)0
Gross Leasable Area (SQFT)8,265
Remodeled Year 0
Total Stories 1
Physical Depreciation (% Bad)AVERAGE 56
Depreciated Value $365,692
Economic Depreciation (% Bad)0
Functional Depreciation (% Bad)0
Total Depreciated Value $365,692
Market Area Factor 1
Building Value $365,692
Misc Improvements Value
Total Improvement Value $365,692
Assessed Land Value $340,047
Assessed Total Value $1,878,900
Section 1 Details
Occupancy
Type
COMMERCIAL
3-FIX-BATHS 21
Air
Conditioning
Y
Class C-CONCRT/MASONRY-
WLS
Depreciation AVERAGE
Depreciation 56%
Exterior Walls 07-CONCRETE-BLOCK
Exterior Walls 10-BRK-VEN/CON-
BLOCK
Exterior Walls 18-UNFIN/PARTY-WALL
Interior Finish MTC-MOTEL
Occupancy MTC-MOTEL
Quality C
Sprinkler N
Building Sketch Photograph
10/10/22, 12:56 PM Print Property Info
https://taxpwa.co.cumberland.nc.us/camapwa/PrintPRC.aspx?PARCELPK=75499 4/11
Card 3 2025 S EASTERN BLVD
Building Details
Bldg Name
Primary Occupancy Type COMMERCIAL
Primary Occupancy MTC-MOTEL
Primary Class C-CONCRT/MASONRY-WLS
Primary Quality C
Year Built 1954
Effective Year 1975
Physical Depreciation (Rating)AVERAGE
Physical Depreciation (% Bad)56
Economic Depreciation (% Bad)0
Functional Depreciation (% Bad)0
Gross Leasable Area (SQFT)3,633
Remodeled Year 0
Total Stories 1
Building Total & Improvement Details
Total Adjusted Replacement Cost New $369,923
Physical Depreciation (% Bad)AVERAGE 56
Depreciated Value $162,766
Economic Depreciation (% Bad)0
Functional Depreciation (% Bad)0
Total Depreciated Value $162,766
Market Area Factor 1
Building Value $162,766
Misc Improvements Value
Total Improvement Value $162,766
Assessed Land Value $340,047
Assessed Total Value $1,878,900
Section 1 Details
Occupancy
Type
COMMERCIAL
3-FIX-BATHS 10
Air
Conditioning
Y
Class C-CONCRT/MASONRY-
WLS
Depreciation AVERAGE
Depreciation 56%
Exterior Walls 07-CONCRETE-BLOCK
Exterior Walls 10-BRK-VEN/CON-
BLOCK
Interior Finish MTC-MOTEL
10/10/22, 12:56 PM Print Property Info
https://taxpwa.co.cumberland.nc.us/camapwa/PrintPRC.aspx?PARCELPK=75499 5/11
Addition Summary
Story Type Code Area
1.00 CNPY COMM AVG CCC 1002
Card 4 2025 S EASTERN BLVD
Occupancy MTC-MOTEL
Quality C
Sprinkler N
Building Sketch Photograph
Building Details
Bldg Name
Primary Occupancy Type COMMERCIAL
Primary Occupancy MTC-MOTEL
Primary Class C-CONCRT/MASONRY-WLS
Primary Quality C
Year Built 1958
Effective Year 1975
Physical Depreciation (Rating)AVERAGE
Physical Depreciation (% Bad)56
Economic Depreciation (% Bad)0
Functional Depreciation (% Bad)0
Gross Leasable Area (SQFT)6,048
Remodeled Year 0
Total Stories 1
Building Total & Improvement Details
Total Adjusted Replacement Cost New $634,409
Physical Depreciation (% Bad)AVERAGE 56
Depreciated Value $279,140
Economic Depreciation (% Bad)0
Functional Depreciation (% Bad)0
Total Depreciated Value $279,140
Market Area Factor 1
Building Value $279,140
Misc Improvements Value
Total Improvement Value $279,140
Assessed Land Value $340,047
Assessed Total Value $1,878,900
Section 1 Details
Occupancy
Type
COMMERCIAL
3-FIX-BATHS 19
10/10/22, 12:56 PM Print Property Info
https://taxpwa.co.cumberland.nc.us/camapwa/PrintPRC.aspx?PARCELPK=75499 6/11
Addition Summary
Story Type Code Area
1.00 UTILITY FIN UTF 715
1.00 CNPY COMM AVG CCC 1644
Card 5 2025 S EASTERN BLVD
Air
Conditioning
Y
Class C-CONCRT/MASONRY-
WLS
Depreciation AVERAGE
Depreciation 56%
Exterior Walls 07-CONCRETE-BLOCK
Exterior Walls 10-BRK-VEN/CON-
BLOCK
Interior Finish MTC-MOTEL
Occupancy MTC-MOTEL
Quality C
Sprinkler N
Building Sketch Photograph
Building Details
Bldg Name
Primary Occupancy Type COMMERCIAL
Primary Occupancy MTC-MOTEL
Primary Class C-CONCRT/MASONRY-WLS
Primary Quality C
Year Built 1957
Effective Year 1975
Physical Depreciation (Rating)AVERAGE
Physical Depreciation (% Bad)56
Building Total & Improvement Details
Total Adjusted Replacement Cost New $357,273
Physical Depreciation (% Bad)AVERAGE 56
Depreciated Value $157,200
Economic Depreciation (% Bad)0
Functional Depreciation (% Bad)0
Total Depreciated Value $157,200
Market Area Factor 1
Building Value $157,201
Misc Improvements Value
10/10/22, 12:56 PM Print Property Info
https://taxpwa.co.cumberland.nc.us/camapwa/PrintPRC.aspx?PARCELPK=75499 7/11
Addition Summary
Story Type Code Area
1.00 CNPY COMM AVG CCC 1245
1.00 CNPY COMM AVG CCC 464
Card 6 2025 S EASTERN BLVD
Economic Depreciation (% Bad)0
Functional Depreciation (% Bad)0
Gross Leasable Area (SQFT)3,299
Remodeled Year 0
Total Stories 1
Total Improvement Value $157,201
Assessed Land Value $340,047
Assessed Total Value $1,878,900
Section 1 Details
Occupancy
Type
COMMERCIAL
3-FIX-BATHS 9
Air
Conditioning
Y
Class C-CONCRT/MASONRY-
WLS
Depreciation AVERAGE
Depreciation 56%
Exterior Walls 07-CONCRETE-BLOCK
Exterior Walls 10-BRK-VEN/CON-
BLOCK
Interior Finish MTC-MOTEL
Occupancy MTC-MOTEL
Quality C
Sprinkler N
Building Sketch Photograph
Building Details Building Total & Improvement Details
10/10/22, 12:56 PM Print Property Info
https://taxpwa.co.cumberland.nc.us/camapwa/PrintPRC.aspx?PARCELPK=75499 8/11
Addition Summary
Story Type Code Area
1.00 UTILITY UNFIN UTU 64
Bldg Name
Primary Occupancy Type COMMERCIAL
Primary Occupancy TRM-TABLE-REST-MOTEL
Primary Class C-CONCRT/MASONRY-WLS
Primary Quality C
Year Built 1969
Effective Year 1975
Physical Depreciation (Rating)AVERAGE
Physical Depreciation (% Bad)56
Economic Depreciation (% Bad)0
Functional Depreciation (% Bad)0
Gross Leasable Area (SQFT)5,976
Remodeled Year 0
Total Stories 1
Total Adjusted Replacement Cost New $562,957
Physical Depreciation (% Bad)AVERAGE 56
Depreciated Value $247,701
Economic Depreciation (% Bad)0
Functional Depreciation (% Bad)0
Total Depreciated Value $247,701
Market Area Factor 1
Building Value $248,218
Misc Improvements Value
Total Improvement Value $248,218
Assessed Land Value $340,047
Assessed Total Value $1,878,900
Section 1 Details
Occupancy
Type
COMMERCIAL
2-FIX-BATHS 5
Air
Conditioning
Y
Class C-CONCRT/MASONRY-
WLS
Depreciation AVERAGE
Depreciation 56%
Exterior Walls 10-BRK-VEN/CON-
BLOCK
Exterior Walls 33-BLD-FRONT-
AVERAGE
Interior Finish TRM-TABLE-REST-
MOTEL
Occupancy TRM-TABLE-REST-
MOTEL
Quality C
Sprinkler N
Section 2 Details
Occupancy
Type
COMMERCIAL
Air
Conditioning
Y
Class C-CONCRT/MASONRY-
WLS
Depreciation AVERAGE
Depreciation 56%
Exterior Walls 10-BRK-VEN/CON-
BLOCK
Exterior Walls 33-BLD-FRONT-
AVERAGE
Interior Finish OFH-OFF-SPACE-HOTEL
Occupancy OFH-OFF-SPACE-HOTEL
Quality C
Sprinkler N
Building Sketch Photograph
10/10/22, 12:56 PM Print Property Info
https://taxpwa.co.cumberland.nc.us/camapwa/PrintPRC.aspx?PARCELPK=75499 9/11
Misc Improvements Summary
Land Summary
Card
#
Unit
Quantity Measure Type Base
Price
Eff
Year
Phys Depr
(% Bad)
Econ Depr
(% Bad)
Funct Depr
(% Bad)
Common Interest
(% Good)Value
1 882 SIZE CONCRETE
PATIO
$4.04 1983 65 0 0 $1,247
1 53479 SIZE ASPHALT
PAVING
$2.22 1983 65 0 0 $53,345
1 828 SIZE SIDEWALK $4.04 1983 65 0 0 $1,171
1 16x16 DIMENSIONS UTILITY
FRAME
$16.15 1983 65 0 0 $1,049
1 26x40 DIMENSIONS SWM POOL
COMM
1983 65 0 0 $21,392
1 10x10 DIMENSIONS GAZEBO $28.91 1985 65 0 0 $1,012
1 208 SIZE WOOD
VINYL FEN
$16.00 1985 75 0 0 $932
1 14x12 DIMENSIONS UTILITY
FRAME
$16.15 1985 65 0 0 $950
1 16x36 DIMENSIONS UTILITY
FRAME
$16.15 1985 65 0 0 $4,721
1 950 SIZE CL FENCE $8.61 1985 65 0 0 $3,658
1 175 SIZE WOOD
VINYL FEN
$16.00 1985 65 0 0 $357
1 180 SIZE FENCE
METAL/IN
$33.30 1985 65 0 0 $1,951
1 70 SIZE UTILITY
FRAME
$16.15 1990 65 0 0 $574
1 70 SIZE OPEN POR
FIN
$23.13 1990 65 0 0 $567
1 4849 SIZE CONCRETE
PAV
$4.04 1983 65 0 0 $6,857
1 96729 SIZE IMPERVIOUS
ARE
2021 100 0 0
Total Misc Improvements Value Assessed: $99,783
10/10/22, 12:56 PM Print Property Info
https://taxpwa.co.cumberland.nc.us/camapwa/PrintPRC.aspx?PARCELPK=75499 10/11
Income Summary
Ownership History
Zoning Soil
Class Description Size Rate Size Adj.
Factor
Land
Adjustment
Land
Value
CC 1096-COMM-SQ-
FOOTAG
178596.00 SQUARE FOOT
PRICED
$4 $340,047
Total Land Value Assessed: $340,047
Land Class: H103-HOTEL/M Deeded Acres: 0 Calculated Acres: 4.09
Income Modeling
Income Model Type
Income Location Average
Economic Year Built
Potential Gross Income (PGI)
Description Measurement Unit Quantity Annual Unit Income Annual PGI
HOTELS MOTELS UNITS 62 26396.8 1636601.6
Total Units 62
Total Sqft 0
Total Potential Gross Income 1636601.6
Total Potential Gross Income Override 0
Effective Gross Income (EGI)
Deductions Total 572810.56
Deductions Total (% of PGI)35
Misc Income 0
Misc Income (% of PGI)0
Total Effective Gross Income 1063791.04
Net Expenses
Total Expenses
Total Expenses Override $861,670.74
Net Income $202,120.3
Percentage of PGI 12.35
Percentage of EGI 19
Final Value
Income Method Overall Rate
Rate Used 0.10239
Total Value $1,974,023.83
Excess Land
Furniture, Fixtures, & Equipment $95,100
Additional Buildings
Supporting Parcels
Final Value $1,878,900
Final Value Override
Owner Name Deed Type % Ownership Stamps Sale Price Book Page Deed Date
Current ASSOC SERV CORP T/A AMBASSADOR INN DE-DEED 100 0 000000 00000 1/1/1900
10/10/22, 12:56 PM Print Property Info
https://taxpwa.co.cumberland.nc.us/camapwa/PrintPRC.aspx?PARCELPK=75499 11/11
Notes Summary
Building Card Date Line Notes
No Data
10/10/22, 12:57 PM Print Property Info
https://taxpwa.co.cumberland.nc.us/camapwa/PrintPRC.aspx?PARCELPK=75491 1/3
Cumberland County Property Record Card
Property Summary
Tax Year: 2022
Building Summary
REID 0436124155000 PIN 0436-12-4155 Property Owner AUTOZONE
DEVELOPMENT CORP
Location
Address
2303
GILLESPIE ST
Property
Description
ISLEY ACRES LOPT 1-4, PT SE00001
PL0008-0069
Owner's Mailing
Address
123 S FRONT ST
MEMPHIS TN 38101
Administrative Data
Plat Book & Page 0008-0069
Old Map #
Market Area 8020
Township NONE
Planning Jurisdiction COUNTY
City FAYETTEVILLE
Fire District
Spec District
Land Class C358-SHOP/RE
History REID 1
History REID 2
Acreage 0.99
Permit Date
Permit #
Transfer Information
Deed Date 12/27/2012
Deed Book 009074
Deed Page 00694
Revenue Stamps $1,160
Package Sale Date
Package Sale Price
Land Sale Date 12/27/2012
Land Sale Price $580,000
Improvement Summary
Total Buildings 1
Total Units 0
Total Living Area 0
Total Gross Leasable Area 7,360
Property Value
Total Appraised Land Value $173,015
Total Appraised Building Value $495,236
Total Appraised Misc
Improvements Value
$52,039
Total Cost Value $720,290
Total Appraised Value - Valued
By Cost
$720,290
Other Exemptions
Exemption Desc
Use Value Deferred
Historic Value Deferred
Total Deferred Value
Total Taxable Value $720,290
Card 1 2303 GILLESPIE ST
Building Details
Bldg Name AUTO ZONE
Primary Occupancy Type COMMERCIAL
Primary Occupancy RTC-RETAIL-STORE-AVG
Primary Class C-CONCRT/MASONRY-WLS
Primary Quality C
Year Built 2013
Effective Year 2013
Physical Depreciation (Rating)GOOD
Physical Depreciation (% Bad)4
Economic Depreciation (% Bad)0
Functional Depreciation (% Bad)0
Gross Leasable Area (SQFT)7,360
Remodeled Year 0
Total Stories 1
Building Total & Improvement Details
Total Adjusted Replacement Cost New $515,870
Physical Depreciation (% Bad)GOOD 4
Depreciated Value $495,235
Economic Depreciation (% Bad)0
Functional Depreciation (% Bad)0
Total Depreciated Value $495,235
Market Area Factor 1
Building Value $495,236
Misc Improvements Value $52,039
Total Improvement Value $547,275
Assessed Land Value $173,015
Assessed Total Value $720,290
Section 1 Details
ADJACENT PROPERTY - SOUTHEAST
10/10/22, 12:57 PM Print Property Info
https://taxpwa.co.cumberland.nc.us/camapwa/PrintPRC.aspx?PARCELPK=75491 2/3
Misc Improvements Summary
Addition Summary
Story Type Code Area
1.00 CNPY COMM AVG CCC 231
Occupancy
Type
COMMERCIAL
2-FIX-BATHS 2
Air
Conditioning
Y
Class C-CONCRT/MASONRY-
WLS
Depreciation 4%
Depreciation GOOD
Exterior Walls 09-CON-
BLOCK/STUCCO
Exterior Walls 33-BLD-FRONT-
AVERAGE
Exterior Walls 07-CONCRETE-BLOCK
Exterior Walls 37-RIB-CB/SPLIT-STON
Interior Finish RTC-RETAIL-STORE-
AVG
Occupancy RTC-RETAIL-STORE-
AVG
Quality C
Sprinkler N
Building Sketch Photograph
Card
#
Unit
Quantity Measure Type Base
Price
Eff
Year
Phys Depr
(% Bad)
Econ Depr
(% Bad)
Funct Depr
(% Bad)
Common Interest
(% Good)Value
1 11923 SIZE ASPHALT
PAVING
$2.22 2013 13 0 0 $29,563
Total Misc Improvements Value Assessed: $52,039
10/10/22, 12:57 PM Print Property Info
https://taxpwa.co.cumberland.nc.us/camapwa/PrintPRC.aspx?PARCELPK=75491 3/3
Land Summary
Ownership History
Notes Summary
Card
#
Unit
Quantity Measure Type Base
Price
Eff
Year
Phys Depr
(% Bad)
Econ Depr
(% Bad)
Funct Depr
(% Bad)
Common Interest
(% Good)Value
1 1857 SIZE SIDEWALK $4.04 2013 15 0 0 $6,377
1 4445 SIZE CONCRETE
PAV
$4.04 2013 15 0 0 $15,264
1 60 SIZE WOOD
VINYL FEN
$16.00 2013 13 0 0 $835
Total Misc Improvements Value Assessed: $52,039
Zoning Soil
Class Description Size Rate Size Adj.
Factor
Land
Adjustment Land Value
CC 1096-COMM-SQ-
FOOTAG
43124.40 SQUARE FOOT
PRICED
$4 1 $173,015
Total Land Value Assessed: $173,015
Land Class: C358-SHOP/RE Deeded Acres: 0 Calculated Acres: 0.96
Owner Name Deed Type %
Ownership Stamps Sale
Price Book Page Deed Date
Current AUTOZONE DEVELOPMENT CORP WD-WARRANTY
DEED
100 1160 $580,000 009074 00694 12/27/2012
1 Back RIDDLE, JOSEPH P III/ RIDDLE, TRINA T CD-CORRECTIVE
DEED
100 0 008473 00802 9/9/2010
2 Back RIDDLE, TRINA T WD-WARRANTY
DEED
100 0 008467 00110 8/31/2010
3 Back RIDDLE, JOSEPH P III QC-QUIT CLAIM
DEED
100 743 $371,500 007796 00683 1/29/2008
4 Back WILLIAMS, SHARLENE R LX-LAND
EXCHANGE
100 0 005345 00812 10/9/2000
5 Back WILLIAMS, SHARLENE R, CAROLYN R
ARMSTRONG ET AL
ID-INTEREST
DEED
100 0 005345 00808 10/9/2000
6 Back FFCA ACQUISITION CORP WD-WARRANTY
DEED
100 0 004698 00159 7/29/1997
7 Back W & W INVESTMENTS LIMITED
PARTNERSHIP
WD-WARRANTY
DEED
100 0 004613 00367 2/11/1997
8 Back T & B LEASING WD-WARRANTY
DEED
100 0 003384 00148 5/17/1988
9 Back FICKLING, W T/ FICKLING, JANICE G/
WILLIAM, L PRENTICE/ WIFE, .
QC-QUIT CLAIM
DEED
100 0 003384 00046 5/17/1988
Building Card Date Line Notes
No Data
10/10/22, 12:58 PM Print Property Info
https://taxpwa.co.cumberland.nc.us/camapwa/PrintPRC.aspx?PARCELPK=75472 1/3
Cumberland County Property Record Card
Property Summary
Tax Year: 2022
Building Summary
REID
0436120044000
PIN
0436-12-
0044 Property
Owner
SULLIVAN, MARTHA C;MCDUFFIE, GRETCHEN S;MERCER, KAREN
S;PIPPIN, JENNIFER ELIZABETH CULLER;CULLER, KRISTEN
WILLIAMS;CULLER, EMILY MOORE
Location
Address
2302
GILLESPIE ST Property
Description
0.60 AC
SERVICE
STATION
Owner's
Mailing
Address
1007 ARSENAL AVE
FAYETTEVILLE NC 28305
Administrative Data
Plat Book & Page
Old Map #
Market Area 8020
Township NONE
Planning Jurisdiction COUNTY
City FAYETTEVILLE
Fire District
Spec District
Land Class C357-SHOP/RE
History REID 1
History REID 2
Acreage 0.6
Permit Date
Permit #
Transfer Information
Deed Date 12/31/2020
Deed Book 010980
Deed Page 00163
Revenue Stamps
Package Sale Date 9/1/2016
Package Sale Price
Land Sale Date
Land Sale Price
Improvement Summary
Total Buildings 1
Total Units 0
Total Living Area 0
Total Gross Leasable Area 2,204
Property Value
Total Appraised Land Value $134,600
Total Appraised Building Value $241,668
Total Appraised Misc
Improvements Value
$12,687
Total Cost Value $388,955
Total Appraised Value - Valued
By Cost
$388,955
Other Exemptions
Exemption Desc
Use Value Deferred
Historic Value Deferred
Total Deferred Value
Total Taxable Value $388,955
Card 1 2302 GILLESPIE ST
Building Details
Bldg Name
Primary Occupancy Type COMMERCIAL
Primary Occupancy CVC-CONVENIENCE-STOR
Primary Class C-CONCRT/MASONRY-WLS
Primary Quality C
Year Built 1995
Effective Year 1995
Physical Depreciation (Rating)AVERAGE
Physical Depreciation (% Bad)30
Economic Depreciation (% Bad)0
Functional Depreciation (% Bad)0
Gross Leasable Area (SQFT)2,204
Remodeled Year 0
Total Stories 1
Building Total & Improvement Details
Total Adjusted Replacement Cost
New
$345,240
Physical Depreciation (% Bad)AVERAGE
30
Depreciated Value $241,668
Economic Depreciation (% Bad)0
Functional Depreciation (% Bad)0
Total Depreciated Value $241,668
Market Area Factor 1
Building Value $241,668
Misc Improvements Value $12,687
Total Improvement Value $254,355
Assessed Land Value $134,600
Assessed Total Value $388,955
ADJACENT PROPERTY - SOUTHWEST
10/10/22, 12:58 PM Print Property Info
https://taxpwa.co.cumberland.nc.us/camapwa/PrintPRC.aspx?PARCELPK=75472 2/3
Misc Improvements Summary
Addition Summary
Story Type Code Area
1.00 CNPY COMM AVG CCC 7050
Section 1 Details
Occupancy
Type
COMMERCIAL
2-FIX-BATHS 2
Air
Conditioning
Y
Class C-CONCRT/MASONRY-
WLS
Depreciation 30%
Depreciation AVERAGE
Exterior Walls 37-RIB-CB/SPLIT-STON
Exterior Walls 33-BLD-FRONT-
AVERAGE
Interior Finish CVC-CONVENIENCE-
STOR
Occupancy CVC-CONVENIENCE-
STOR
Quality C
Sprinkler N
Building Sketch Photograph
Card
#
Unit
Quantity Measure Type Base
Price
Eff
Year
Phys Depr
(% Bad)
Econ Depr
(% Bad)
Funct Depr
(% Bad)
Common Interest
(% Good)Value
1 13400 SIZE ASPHALT
PAVING
$2.22 1983 65 0 0 $10,426
1 2532 SIZE CONCRETE
PAV
$4.04 1983 65 0 0 $1,790
Total Misc Improvements Value Assessed: $12,687
10/10/22, 12:58 PM Print Property Info
https://taxpwa.co.cumberland.nc.us/camapwa/PrintPRC.aspx?PARCELPK=75472 3/3
Land Summary
Ownership History
Notes Summary
Card
#
Unit
Quantity Measure Type Base
Price
Eff
Year
Phys Depr
(% Bad)
Econ Depr
(% Bad)
Funct Depr
(% Bad)
Common Interest
(% Good)Value
1 4x16 DIMENSIONS MASONRY
UTIL
$16.23 1983 65 0 0 $182
1 160 SIZE CL FENCE $8.61 1983 65 0 0 $289
Total Misc Improvements Value Assessed: $12,687
Zoning Soil
Class Description Size Rate Size Adj.
Factor
Land
Adjustment Land Value
CC 1096-COMM-SQ-
FOOTAG
26136.00 SQUARE FOOT
PRICED
$4 $134,600
Total Land Value Assessed: $134,600
Land Class: C357-SHOP/RE Deeded Acres: 0 Calculated Acres: 0.58
Owner Name Deed Type %
Ownership Stamps Sale
Price Book Page Deed Date
Current SULLIVAN, MARTHA C/ MCDUFFIE, GRETCHEN S/
MERCER, KAREN S/ PIPPIN, JENNIFER ELIZABETH
CULLER/ CULLER, KRISTEN WILLIAMS/ CULLER,
EMILY MOORE
DE-DEED 49, 0.5,
0.5, 50
0 010980 00163 12/31/2020
1 Back SULLIVAN, MARTHA CLARK/ CULLER, KRISTEN W/
PIPPIN, EMILY M/ PIPPIN, JENNIFER E C
Estate-
Number
50, 16.67,
16.67,
16.66
0 00015E 00532 3/17/2015
2 Back SULLIVAN, MARTHA CLARK/ CULLER, NANCY CLARK WD-
WARRANTY
DEED
50, 50 0 004301 00401 4/19/1995
3 Back CLARK, A WILBUR/ MARJORIE, M WD-
WARRANTY
DEED
100 0 003622 00500 10/25/1990
4 Back CLARK, A WILBUR/ CLARK, WIFE DE-DEED 100 0 000619 00122 7/1/1984
Building Card Date Line Notes
No Data
10/10/22, 12:59 PM Print Property Info
https://taxpwa.co.cumberland.nc.us/camapwa/PrintPRC.aspx?PARCELPK=75083 1/3
Cumberland County Property Record Card
Property Summary
Tax Year: 2022
Building Summary
REID 0436029397000 PIN 0436-02-9397 Property Owner ABCD PETERS INC
Location
Address
3081 OWEN
DR Property
Description
LOPTS 22 & 5 PL0204-
0043 Owner's Mailing
Address
2046 OWEN DR
FAYETTEVILLE NC
28306
Administrative Data
Plat Book & Page 0204-0043
Old Map #
Market Area 8010
Township NONE
Planning Jurisdiction COUNTY
City FAYETTEVILLE
Fire District
Spec District
Land Class C300-OFFICE
History REID 1
History REID 2
Acreage 0.22
Permit Date
Permit #
Transfer Information
Deed Date 5/31/2019
Deed Book 010511
Deed Page 00168
Revenue Stamps $50
Package Sale Date 5/31/2019
Package Sale Price $25,000
Land Sale Date
Land Sale Price
Improvement Summary
Total Buildings 1
Total Units 0
Total Living Area 0
Total Gross Leasable Area 564
Property Value
Total Appraised Land Value $54,973
Total Appraised Building Value $531
Total Appraised Misc
Improvements Value
$3,972
Total Cost Value $59,476
Total Appraised Value - Valued By
Cost
$59,476
Other Exemptions
Exemption Desc
Use Value Deferred
Historic Value Deferred
Total Deferred Value
Total Taxable Value $59,476
Card 1 3081 OWEN DR
Building Details
Bldg Name
Primary Occupancy Type COMMERCIAL
Primary Occupancy OFC-OFFICE
Primary Class D-WOOD/LIGHT-STEEL
Primary Quality D
Year Built 1984
Effective Year 1984
Physical Depreciation (Rating)SALVAGE
Physical Depreciation (% Bad)99
Economic Depreciation (% Bad)0
Functional Depreciation (% Bad)0
Gross Leasable Area (SQFT)564
Remodeled Year 0
Total Stories 1
Building Total & Improvement Details
Total Adjusted Replacement Cost
New
$62,466
Physical Depreciation (% Bad)SALVAGE 99
Depreciated Value $625
Economic Depreciation (% Bad)0
Functional Depreciation (% Bad)0
Total Depreciated Value $625
Market Area Factor 1
Building Value $531
Misc Improvements Value $3,972
Total Improvement Value $4,503
Assessed Land Value $54,973
Assessed Total Value $59,476
Section 1 Details
ADJACENT PROPERTY - WEST
10/10/22, 12:59 PM Print Property Info
https://taxpwa.co.cumberland.nc.us/camapwa/PrintPRC.aspx?PARCELPK=75083 2/3
Misc Improvements Summary
Addition Summary
Story Type Code Area
Occupancy
Type
COMMERCIAL
2-FIX-BATHS 1
3-FIX-BATHS 1
Air
Conditioning
N
Class D-WOOD/LIGHT-STEEL
Depreciation 99%
Depreciation SALVAGE
Exterior Walls 03-MAS/ASBSTS-
SIDING
Interior Finish OFC-OFFICE
Occupancy OFC-OFFICE
Quality D
Sprinkler N
Building Sketch Photograph
Card
#
Unit
Quantity Measure Type Base
Price
Eff
Year
Phys Depr (%
Bad)
Econ Depr (%
Bad)
Funct Depr (%
Bad)
Common Interest
(% Good)Value
10/10/22, 12:59 PM Print Property Info
https://taxpwa.co.cumberland.nc.us/camapwa/PrintPRC.aspx?PARCELPK=75083 3/3
Land Summary
Ownership History
Notes Summary
Card
#
Unit
Quantity Measure Type Base
Price
Eff
Year
Phys Depr (%
Bad)
Econ Depr (%
Bad)
Funct Depr (%
Bad)
Common Interest
(% Good)Value
1 290 SIZE CL FENCE $8.61 1984 65 0 0 $874
1 4400 SIZE CONCRETE
PAV
$4.04 1984 85 0 0 $2,080
1 219 UNITS CL FENCE $8.61 2019 10 0 0 $1,018
Total Misc Improvements Value Assessed: $3,972
Zoning Soil
Class Description Size Rate Size Adj.
Factor
Land
Adjustment Land Value
LC 1096-COMM-SQ-
FOOTAG
9583.20 SQUARE FOOT
PRICED
$7.36 SHAPE-75.00 $54,973
Total Land Value Assessed: $54,973
Land Class: C300-OFFICE Deeded Acres: 0 Calculated Acres: 0.22
Owner Name Deed Type %
Ownership Stamps Sale
Price Book Page Deed
Date
Current ABCD PETERS INC WD-WARRANTY
DEED
100 50 $25,000 010511 00168 5/31/2019
1 Back PETERS, R WAYNE/ PETERS, JUDIE R WD-WARRANTY
DEED
100 170 $85,000 006515 00047 5/6/2004
2 Back PETERS, JAMES CRAIG/ PETERS, ALINA
VALLECILLO
WD-WARRANTY
DEED
100 0 003843 00101 9/9/1992
3 Back PETERS, JAMES MAYLON/ PETERS,
BARBARA
WD-WARRANTY
DEED
100 0 003606 00616 8/24/1990
4 Back PETERS, JAMES CRAIG/ PETERS, ALINA
VALLECILLO
WD-WARRANTY
DEED
100 26 $26,000 003230 00723 12/2/1986
Building Card Date Line Notes
No Data

APPENDIX D

Well Construction Record (GW-1) Form

And

Boring Log
WELL CONSTRUCTION RECORD
This form can be used for single or multiple wells
Form GW-1 North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources – Division of Water 5HVRXUFHV Revised AXJXVW 2013
1. Well Contractor Information:

Well Contractor Name

NC Well Contractor Certification Number

Company Name 2. Well Construction Permit #: List all applicable well permits (i.e. County, State, Variance, ,QMHFWLRQetc.) 3. Well Use (check well use): Water Supply Well: □Agricultural □Municipal/Public □Geothermal (Heating/Cooling Supply) □Residential Water Supply (single)
□Industrial/Commercial □Residential Water Supply (shared) □Irrigation
Non-Water Supply Well: □Monitoring □Recovery
Injection Well: □Aquifer Recharge □Groundwater Remediation
□Aquifer Storage and Recovery □Salinity Barrier □Aquifer Test □Stormwater Drainage
□Experimental Technology □Subsidence Control
□Geothermal (Closed Loop) □Tracer □Geothermal (Heating/Cooling Return) □Other (explain under #21 Remarks)
4. Date Well(s) Completed: ____________ Well ID#______________________ 5a. Well Location:
Facility/Owner Name Facility ID# (if applicable)

Physical Address, City, and Zip
County Parcel Identification No. (PIN) 5b. Latitude and Longitude in degrees/minutes/seconds or decimal degrees: (if well field, one lat/long is sufficient) N W
6. Is (are) the well(s): □Permanent or □Temporary

7. Is this a repair to an existing well: □Yes or □No If this is a repair, fill out known well construction information and explain the nature of the repair under #21 remarks section or on the back of this form.
8. Number of wells constructed: For multiple injection or non-water supply wells ONLY with the same construction, you can submit one form. 9. Total well depth below land surface: (ft.) For multiple wells list all depths if different (example- 3@200’ and 2@100′) 10. Static water level below top of casing: (ft.) If water level is above casing, use “+” 11. Borehole diameter: (in.) 12. Well construction method: (i.e. auger, rotary, cable, direct push, etc.) FOR WATER SUPPLY WELLS ONLY: 13a. Yield (gpm) Method of test: 13b. Disinfection type: Amount:

14. WATER ZONES
FROM TO DESCRIPTION
ft. ft.
ft. ft.
15. OUTER CASING (for multi-cased wells) OR LINER (if applicable) FROM TO DIAMETER THICKNESS MATERIAL
ft. ft. in.
16. INNER CASING OR TUBING (geothermal closed-loop)
FROM TO DIAMETER THICKNESS MATERIAL
ft. ft. in.
ft. ft. in.
17. SCREEN FROM TO DIAMETER SLOT SIZE THICKNESS MATERIAL
ft. ft. in.
ft. ft. in.
18. GROUT
FROM TO MATERIAL EMPLACEMENT METHOD & AMOUNT
ft. ft.
ft. ft.
ft. ft.
19. SAND/GRAVEL PACK (if applicable)
FROM TO MATERIAL EMPLACEMENT METHOD
ft. ft.
ft. ft.
20. DRILLING LOG (attach additional sheets if necessary) FROM TO DESCRIPTION (color, hardness, soil/rock type, grain size, etc.)
ft. ft.
ft. ft.
ft. ft.
ft. ft.
ft. ft.
ft. ft.
ft. ft.
21. REMARKS

22. Certification:
Signature of Certified Well Contractor Date By signing this form, I hereby certify that the well(s) was (were) constructed in accordance with 15A NCAC 02C .0100 or 15A NCAC 02C .0200 Well Construction Standards and that a copy of this record has been provided to the well owner.
23. Site diagram or additional well details: You may use the back of this page to provide additional well site details or well construction details. You may also attach additional pages if necessary. SUBMITTAL INSTUCTIONS 24a. For All Wells: Submit this form within 30 days of completion of well construction to the following: Division of Water Resources, Information Processing Unit, 1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
24b. For Injection Wells ONLY: In addition to sending the form to the address in
24a above, also submit a copy of this form within 30 days of completion of well construction to the following: Division of Water Resources, Underground Injection Control Program, 1636 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1636
24c. For Water Supply & Injection Wells:
Also submit one copy of this form within 30 days of completion ofwell construction to the county health department of the county whereconstructed.
For Internal Use ONLY:
0
5
10
15
LOCATION:
DRILLING METHOD:
EMS PROJECT #:
INSTALLED BY:
20
25
30
35
40
45
DEPTH
(FT.)
MONITOR WELL DRILLING LOG
MONITOR WELL I.D. :
DRILLING
SITE LOCATION:
DATE INSTALLED:
ALL MEASUREMENTS IN FEET.
BORING LOG WELL CONSTRUCTION
NOTES:
COLISEUM FAMILY FARE #185
2036 GILLESPIE STREET, FAYETTEVILLE, NC 28306
CEMENT PAD
CEMENT SCH. 40 PVC
RISERBENTONITE
SAND
SCH. 40 PVC
SCREEN
LOCKING CAP
C0NSTRUCTION NOTES
CASING TYPE
CASING I.D.
SCREEN TYPE
SCREEN I.D.
SCREEN INLET SIZE
CEMENT
BENTONITE
SAND
PVC RISER
SCREEN
TO
TO
TO
TO
TO
SCHEDULE 40 PVC
2 - INCH
SCHEDULE 40 PVC
2 - INCH
0.01 - INCH
MONITORING WELL NOT TO SCALE.
DESCRIPTION OF LITHOLOGY
7889
RANSIER ENV. DRILLING
VOC(PPM)
ROTARY AIR
#1
MANHOLE & COVER
LOGGED BY: JWA
DATE: 9/22/2022
0
11.0 13
13 35
0.0 15
15 35
NORTH OF UST BASIN
11.0
MW-1
9/22/2022
4.9
TAN TO BROWN
DRILLING TERMINATED AT 35 FT.
PAVING/FILL
SILTY SAND
22.7
0.0
40.4
REDDISH BROWN
SANDY CLAY

APPENDIX E

LSA Analytical Reports with COC Documentation

102-A Woodwinds Industrial Court
Cary NC, 27511
919.467.3090 919.467.3515Phone:FAX:[TOC_1]ENCO Laboratories, Inc.[TOC]
ENCO Workorder(s): CF14538
Durham, NC 27703
Unless otherwise noted in an attached project narrative, all samples were received in
acceptable condition and processed in accordance with the referenced methods/procedures.
Results for these procedures apply only to the samples as submitted.
The analytical results contained in this report are in compliance with NELAC standards, except
as noted in the project narrative if applicable. This report shall not be reproduced except in
full, without the written approval of the Laboratory.
This report contains only those analyses performed by Environmental Conservation
Laboratories. Unless otherwise noted, all analyses were performed at ENCO Cary. Data from
outside organizations will be reported under separate cover.
If you have any questions or require further information, please do not hesitate to contact me.
Sincerely,
Enclosure(s)
Project Number: 7889, Project Name/Desc: Coliseum BP #125
Attn: Justin Abreu
EMS Environmental (EM001)
117 South Hoover Road
Shahla Vakili
Project Manager
Thursday, September 29, 2022
RE: Laboratory Results for
Dear Justin Abreu,
Enclosed is a copy of your laboratory report for test samples received by our laboratory on
Thursday, September 22, 2022.
Enclosure(s)
Page 1 of 14This report relates only to the sample as received by the laboratory, and may only be reproduced in full.FINAL Page 1 of 14
www.encolabs.com
SAMPLE SUMMARY/LABORATORY CHRONICLE [TOC_1]Sample Chronical[TOC]
MW-1 @ 5 CF14538-01 Sampled:09/22/22 10:11 Received:09/22/22 13:45Client ID:Lab ID:
Prep Date/Time(s)Hold Date/Time(s)Parameter Analysis Date/Time(s)Preparation
EPA 8015C 10/06/22 09/26/22 14:58 09/28/22 15:53EPA 5035
EPA 8260D 10/06/22 09/23/22 11:42 09/24/22 00:24EPA 5035_MS
MAVPH 10/20/22 09/27/22 07:09 09/29/22 04:31EPA 5035
MW-1 @ 10 CF14538-02 Sampled:09/22/22 10:15 Received:09/22/22 13:45Client ID:Lab ID:
Prep Date/Time(s)Hold Date/Time(s)Parameter Analysis Date/Time(s)Preparation
MAVPH 10/20/22 09/27/22 07:09 09/29/22 05:20EPA 5035
MW-1 @ 15 CF14538-03 Sampled:09/22/22 10:22 Received:09/22/22 13:45Client ID:Lab ID:
Prep Date/Time(s)Hold Date/Time(s)Parameter Analysis Date/Time(s)Preparation
MAVPH 10/20/22 09/27/22 07:09 09/29/22 05:59EPA 5035
MW-1 @ 20 CF14538-04 Sampled:09/22/22 10:26 Received:09/22/22 13:45Client ID:Lab ID:
Prep Date/Time(s)Hold Date/Time(s)Parameter Analysis Date/Time(s)Preparation
EPA 8015C 10/06/22 09/26/22 14:58 09/28/22 16:27EPA 5035
EPA 8260D 10/06/22 09/23/22 11:42 09/24/22 00:57EPA 5035_MS
MAVPH 10/20/22 09/27/22 07:09 09/29/22 07:06EPA 5035
Page 2 of 14This report relates only to the sample as received by the laboratory, and may only be reproduced in full.FINAL Page 2 of 14
www.encolabs.com
SAMPLE DETECTION SUMMARY [TOC_1]Detection Summary[TOC]
Lab ID:Client ID:MW-1 @ 5 CF14538-01
Analyte MethodUnitsPQLResultsFlag NotesMDL
2.43 1.29 mg/kg dry MAVPH C9-C10 Aromatics 0.621
Lab ID:Client ID:MW-1 @ 10 CF14538-02
Analyte MethodUnitsPQLResultsFlag NotesMDL
9.45 3.28 mg/kg dry MAVPH C5-C8 Aliphatics 0.809
5.75 1.09 mg/kg dry MAVPH C9-C10 Aromatics 0.525
Lab ID:Client ID:MW-1 @ 15 CF14538-03
Analyte MethodUnitsPQLResultsFlag NotesMDL
1.68 1.06 mg/kg dry MAVPH C9-C10 Aromatics 0.508
Lab ID:Client ID:MW-1 @ 20 CF14538-04
Analyte MethodUnitsPQLResultsFlag NotesMDL
0.0018 0.0010 mg/kg dry EPA 8260D 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 0.00017
0.00052 0.0010 mg/kg dry EPA 8260DJ 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 0.00020
0.0081 0.0010 mg/kg dry EPA 8260D Benzene 0.00017
1.72 0.989 mg/kg dry MAVPH C9-C10 Aromatics 0.475
0.0020 0.0010 mg/kg dry EPA 8260D Ethylbenzene 0.00020
0.0054 0.0020 mg/kg dry EPA 8260D m,p-Xylenes 0.00037
0.00055 0.0010 mg/kg dry EPA 8260DJ Naphthalene 0.00027
0.00097 0.0010 mg/kg dry EPA 8260DJ sec-Butylbenzene 0.00095
0.0054 0.0030 mg/kg dry EPA 8260D Xylenes (Total)0.00056
Page 3 of 14This report relates only to the sample as received by the laboratory, and may only be reproduced in full.FINAL Page 3 of 14
www.encolabs.com
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
[TOC_1]Analytical Results[TOC]
MW-1 @ 5Description:Lab Sample ID:CF14538-01 09/22/22 13:45Received:
CF14538Work Order:09/22/22 10:11Sampled:SoilMatrix:
94.68% Solids:Justin AbreuSampled By:Project:Coliseum BP #125
[TOC_2]MW-1 @ 5[TOC]
Volatile Organic Compounds by GCMS
^ - ENCO Cary certified analyte [NC 591]
NotesFlagPQLBatchByAnalyzedMethodMDLResultsUnitsDFAnalyte [CAS Number]
mg/kg dry EPA 8260D 09/24/22 00:241,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane [630-20-6]^0.00017 RKY2I230300.00110.00017 U 1
mg/kg dry EPA 8260D 09/24/22 00:241,1,1-Trichloroethane [71-55-6]^0.00026 RKY2I230300.00110.00026 U QV-011
mg/kg dry EPA 8260D 09/24/22 00:241,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane [79-34-5]^0.00021 RKY2I230300.00110.00021 U 1
mg/kg dry EPA 8260D 09/24/22 00:241,1,2-Trichloroethane [79-00-5]^0.00026 RKY2I230300.00110.00026 U 1
mg/kg dry EPA 8260D 09/24/22 00:241,1-Dichloroethane [75-34-3]^0.00026 RKY2I230300.00110.00026 U QV-011
mg/kg dry EPA 8260D 09/24/22 00:241,1-Dichloroethene [75-35-4]^0.00032 RKY2I230300.00110.00032 U 1
mg/kg dry EPA 8260D 09/24/22 00:241,1-Dichloropropene [563-58-6]^0.00017 RKY2I230300.00110.00017 U QV-011
mg/kg dry EPA 8260D 09/24/22 00:241,2,3-Trichlorobenzene [87-61-6]^0.00030 RKY2I230300.00110.00030 U 1
mg/kg dry EPA 8260D 09/24/22 00:241,2,3-Trichloropropane [96-18-4]^0.00068 RKY2I230300.00110.00068 U 1
mg/kg dry EPA 8260D 09/24/22 00:241,2,4-Trichlorobenzene [120-82-1]^0.00029 RKY2I230300.00110.00029 U 1
mg/kg dry EPA 8260D 09/24/22 00:241,2,4-Trimethylbenzene [95-63-6]^0.00018 RKY2I230300.00110.00018 U 1
mg/kg dry EPA 8260D 09/24/22 00:241,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane [96-12-8]^0.00083 RKY2I230300.00110.00083 U 1
mg/kg dry EPA 8260D 09/24/22 00:241,2-Dibromoethane [106-93-4]^0.00049 RKY2I230300.00110.00049 U 1
mg/kg dry EPA 8260D 09/24/22 00:241,2-Dichlorobenzene [95-50-1]^0.00029 RKY2I230300.00110.00029 U 1
mg/kg dry EPA 8260D 09/24/22 00:241,2-Dichloroethane [107-06-2]^0.00043 RKY2I230300.00110.00043 U QV-011
mg/kg dry EPA 8260D 09/24/22 00:241,2-Dichloropropane [78-87-5]^0.00027 RKY2I230300.00110.00027 U 1
mg/kg dry EPA 8260D 09/24/22 00:241,3,5-Trimethylbenzene [108-67-8]^0.00021 RKY2I230300.00110.00021 U 1
mg/kg dry EPA 8260D 09/24/22 00:241,3-Dichlorobenzene [541-73-1]^0.00023 RKY2I230300.00110.00023 U 1
mg/kg dry EPA 8260D 09/24/22 00:241,3-Dichloropropane [142-28-9]^0.00031 RKY2I230300.00110.00031 U 1
mg/kg dry EPA 8260D 09/24/22 00:241,4-Dichlorobenzene [106-46-7]^0.00021 RKY2I230300.00110.00021 U A-071
mg/kg dry EPA 8260D 09/24/22 00:242,2-Dichloropropane [594-20-7]^0.00024 RKY2I230300.00110.00024 U QV-011
mg/kg dry EPA 8260D 09/24/22 00:242-Butanone [78-93-3]^0.00082 RKY2I230300.00530.00082 U QV-011
mg/kg dry EPA 8260D 09/24/22 00:242-Chloroethyl Vinyl Ether [110-75-8]^0.00017 RKY2I230300.00530.00017 U 1
mg/kg dry EPA 8260D 09/24/22 00:242-Chlorotoluene [95-49-8]^0.00019 RKY2I230300.00110.00019 U 1
mg/kg dry EPA 8260D 09/24/22 00:242-Hexanone [591-78-6]^0.00079 RKY2I230300.00530.00079 U 1
mg/kg dry EPA 8260D 09/24/22 00:244-Chlorotoluene [106-43-4]^0.00027 RKY2I230300.00110.00027 U 1
mg/kg dry EPA 8260D 09/24/22 00:244-Isopropyltoluene [99-87-6]^0.00017 RKY2I230300.00110.00017 U 1
mg/kg dry EPA 8260D 09/24/22 00:244-Methyl-2-pentanone [108-10-1]^0.00060 RKY2I230300.00530.00060 U QV-011
mg/kg dry EPA 8260D 09/24/22 00:24Acetone [67-64-1]^0.015 RKY2I230300.0210.015 U QV-011
mg/kg dry EPA 8260D 09/24/22 00:24Benzene [71-43-2]^0.00018 RKY2I230300.00110.00018 U 1
mg/kg dry EPA 8260D 09/24/22 00:24Bromobenzene [108-86-1]^0.00023 RKY2I230300.00110.00023 U 1
mg/kg dry EPA 8260D 09/24/22 00:24Bromochloromethane [74-97-5]^0.00043 RKY2I230300.00110.00043 U 1
mg/kg dry EPA 8260D 09/24/22 00:24Bromodichloromethane [75-27-4]^0.00025 RKY2I230300.00110.00025 U QV-011
mg/kg dry EPA 8260D 09/24/22 00:24Bromoform [75-25-2]^0.00048 RKY2I230300.00110.00048 U 1
mg/kg dry EPA 8260D 09/24/22 00:24Bromomethane [74-83-9]^0.00034 RKY2I230300.00110.00034 U QV-011
mg/kg dry EPA 8260D 09/24/22 00:24Carbon disulfide [75-15-0]^0.00041 RKY2I230300.00530.00041 U 1
mg/kg dry EPA 8260D 09/24/22 00:24Carbon Tetrachloride [56-23-5]^0.00023 RKY2I230300.00110.00023 U QV-011
mg/kg dry EPA 8260D 09/24/22 00:24Chlorobenzene [108-90-7]^0.00018 RKY2I230300.00110.00018 U 1
mg/kg dry EPA 8260D 09/24/22 00:24Chloroethane [75-00-3]^0.00026 RKY2I230300.00110.00026 U QV-011
mg/kg dry EPA 8260D 09/24/22 00:24Chloroform [67-66-3]^0.00019 RKY2I230300.00110.00019 U QV-011
mg/kg dry EPA 8260D 09/24/22 00:24Chloromethane [74-87-3]^0.00022 RKY2I230300.00110.00022 U 1
mg/kg dry EPA 8260D 09/24/22 00:24cis-1,2-Dichloroethene [156-59-2]^0.00024 RKY2I230300.00110.00024 U 1
mg/kg dry EPA 8260D 09/24/22 00:24cis-1,3-Dichloropropene [10061-01-5]^0.00018 RKY2I230300.00110.00018 U QV-011
mg/kg dry EPA 8260D 09/24/22 00:24Dibromochloromethane [124-48-1]^0.00037 RKY2I230300.00110.00037 U 1
mg/kg dry EPA 8260D 09/24/22 00:24Dibromomethane [74-95-3]^0.00035 RKY2I230300.00110.00035 U 1
mg/kg dry EPA 8260D 09/24/22 00:24Dichlorodifluoromethane [75-71-8]^0.00048 RKY2I230300.00110.00048 U 1
mg/kg dry EPA 8260D 09/24/22 00:24Ethylbenzene [100-41-4]^0.00021 RKY2I230300.00110.00021 U 1
Page 4 of 14This report relates only to the sample as received by the laboratory, and may only be reproduced in full.FINAL Page 4 of 14
www.encolabs.com
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
MW-1 @ 5Description:Lab Sample ID:CF14538-01 09/22/22 13:45Received:
CF14538Work Order:09/22/22 10:11Sampled:SoilMatrix:
94.68% Solids:Justin AbreuSampled By:Project:Coliseum BP #125
Volatile Organic Compounds by GCMS
^ - ENCO Cary certified analyte [NC 591]
NotesFlagPQLBatchByAnalyzedMethodMDLResultsUnitsDFAnalyte [CAS Number]
mg/kg dry EPA 8260D 09/24/22 00:24Hexachlorobutadiene [87-68-3]^0.00037 RKY2I230300.00110.00037 U 1
mg/kg dry EPA 8260D 09/24/22 00:24Isopropylbenzene [98-82-8]^0.00016 RKY2I230300.00110.00016 U 1
mg/kg dry EPA 8260D 09/24/22 00:24m,p-Xylenes [108-38-3/106-42-3]^0.00039 RKY2I230300.00210.00039 U 1
mg/kg dry EPA 8260D 09/24/22 00:24Methylene Chloride [75-09-2]^0.00077 RKY2I230300.00210.00077 U QV-011
mg/kg dry EPA 8260D 09/24/22 00:24Methyl-tert-Butyl Ether [1634-04-4]^0.00032 RKY2I230300.00110.00032 U QV-011
mg/kg dry EPA 8260D 09/24/22 00:24Naphthalene [91-20-3]^0.00029 RKY2I230300.00110.00029 U 1
mg/kg dry EPA 8260D 09/24/22 00:24n-Butyl Benzene [104-51-8]^0.00014 RKY2I230300.00110.00014 U 1
mg/kg dry EPA 8260D 09/24/22 00:24n-Propyl Benzene [103-65-1]^0.00019 RKY2I230300.00110.00019 U 1
mg/kg dry EPA 8260D 09/24/22 00:24o-Xylene [95-47-6]^0.00023 RKY2I230300.00110.00023 U 1
mg/kg dry EPA 8260D 09/24/22 00:24sec-Butylbenzene [135-98-8]^0.0010 RKY2I230300.00110.0010 U 1
mg/kg dry EPA 8260D 09/24/22 00:24Styrene [100-42-5]^0.0010 RKY2I230300.00110.0010 U 1
mg/kg dry EPA 8260D 09/24/22 00:24tert-Butylbenzene [98-06-6]^0.00018 RKY2I230300.00110.00018 U 1
mg/kg dry EPA 8260D 09/24/22 00:24Tetrachloroethene [127-18-4]^0.00030 RKY2I230300.00110.00030 U 1
mg/kg dry EPA 8260D 09/24/22 00:24Toluene [108-88-3]^0.00025 RKY2I230300.00110.00025 U 1
mg/kg dry EPA 8260D 09/24/22 00:24trans-1,2-Dichloroethene [156-60-5]^0.00039 RKY2I230300.00110.00039 U QV-011
mg/kg dry EPA 8260D 09/24/22 00:24trans-1,3-Dichloropropene [10061-02-6]^0.00041 RKY2I230300.00110.00041 U 1
mg/kg dry EPA 8260D 09/24/22 00:24Trichloroethene [79-01-6]^0.00034 RKY2I230300.00110.00034 U 1
mg/kg dry EPA 8260D 09/24/22 00:24Trichlorofluoromethane [75-69-4]^0.00027 RKY2I230300.00110.00027 U QV-011
mg/kg dry EPA 8260D 09/24/22 00:24Vinyl chloride [75-01-4]^0.00025 RKY2I230300.00110.00025 U 1
mg/kg dry EPA 8260D 09/24/22 00:24Xylenes (Total) [1330-20-7]^0.00059 RKY2I230300.00320.00059 U 1
Surrogates Results Spike Lvl % Rec Batch Method Analyzed By% Rec Limits NotesDF
4-Bromofluorobenzene 50-127103 %RKYEPA 8260D 09/24/22 00:242I230305150.0 1
Dibromofluoromethane 52-128113 %RKYEPA 8260D 09/24/22 00:242I230305650.0 1
Toluene-d8 57-12499 %RKYEPA 8260D 09/24/22 00:242I230304950.0 1
Gasoline Range Organics by GC
^ - ENCO Cary certified analyte [NC 591]
NotesFlagPQLBatchByAnalyzedMethodMDLResultsUnitsDFAnalyte [CAS Number]
mg/kg dry EPA 8015C 09/28/22 15:53GRO (C6-C10)^2.6 OWS2I260177.12.6 U 1.23
Surrogates Results Spike Lvl % Rec Batch Method Analyzed By% Rec Limits NotesDF
2,5-Dibromotoluene 59-168103 %OWSEPA 8015C 09/28/22 15:532I260171312.9 1.23
Volatile Petroleum Hydrocarbons by GC
^ - ENCO Cary certified analyte [NC 591]
NotesFlagPQLBatchByAnalyzedMethodMDLResultsUnitsDFAnalyte [CAS Number]
mg/kg dry MAVPH 09/29/22 04:31C5-C8 Aliphatics^0.958 OWS2I270013.880.958 U 1.23
mg/kg dry MAVPH 09/29/22 04:31C9-C10 Aromatics^0.621 OWS2I270011.292.43 1.23
mg/kg dry MAVPH 09/29/22 04:31C9-C12 Aliphatics^1.94 OWS2I270013.881.94 U 1.23
Surrogates Results Spike Lvl % Rec Batch Method Analyzed By% Rec Limits NotesDF
2,5-Dibromotoluene (FID)70-13076 %OWSMAVPH09/29/22 04:312I270019.88 12.9 1.23
2,5-Dibromotoluene (PID)70-13090 %OWSMAVPH09/29/22 04:312I2700111.7 12.9 1.23
Page 5 of 14This report relates only to the sample as received by the laboratory, and may only be reproduced in full.FINAL Page 5 of 14
www.encolabs.com
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
MW-1 @ 10Description:Lab Sample ID:CF14538-02 09/22/22 13:45Received:
CF14538Work Order:09/22/22 10:15Sampled:SoilMatrix:
91.44% Solids:Justin AbreuSampled By:Project:Coliseum BP #125
[TOC_2]MW-1 @ 10[TOC]
Volatile Petroleum Hydrocarbons by GC
^ - ENCO Cary certified analyte [NC 591]
NotesFlagPQLBatchByAnalyzedMethodMDLResultsUnitsDFAnalyte [CAS Number]
mg/kg dry MAVPH 09/29/22 05:20C5-C8 Aliphatics^0.809 OWS2I270013.289.45 1
mg/kg dry MAVPH 09/29/22 05:20C9-C10 Aromatics^0.525 OWS2I270011.095.75 1
mg/kg dry MAVPH 09/29/22 05:20C9-C12 Aliphatics^1.64 OWS2I270013.281.64 U 1
Surrogates Results Spike Lvl % Rec Batch Method Analyzed By% Rec Limits NotesDF
2,5-Dibromotoluene (FID)70-13075 %OWSMAVPH09/29/22 05:202I270017.58 10.1 1
2,5-Dibromotoluene (PID)70-13089 %OWSMAVPH09/29/22 05:202I270018.92 10.1 1
MW-1 @ 15Description:Lab Sample ID:CF14538-03 09/22/22 13:45Received:
CF14538Work Order:09/22/22 10:22Sampled:SoilMatrix:
94.51% Solids:Justin AbreuSampled By:Project:Coliseum BP #125
[TOC_2]MW-1 @ 15[TOC]
Volatile Petroleum Hydrocarbons by GC
^ - ENCO Cary certified analyte [NC 591]
NotesFlagPQLBatchByAnalyzedMethodMDLResultsUnitsDFAnalyte [CAS Number]
mg/kg dry MAVPH 09/29/22 05:59C5-C8 Aliphatics^0.783 OWS2I270013.170.783 U 1
mg/kg dry MAVPH 09/29/22 05:59C9-C10 Aromatics^0.508 OWS2I270011.061.68 1
mg/kg dry MAVPH 09/29/22 05:59C9-C12 Aliphatics^1.59 OWS2I270013.171.59 U 1
Surrogates Results Spike Lvl % Rec Batch Method Analyzed By% Rec Limits NotesDF
2,5-Dibromotoluene (FID)70-13080 %OWSMAVPH09/29/22 05:592I270018.68 10.8 1
2,5-Dibromotoluene (PID)70-13092 %OWSMAVPH09/29/22 05:592I270019.93 10.8 1
Page 6 of 14This report relates only to the sample as received by the laboratory, and may only be reproduced in full.FINAL Page 6 of 14
www.encolabs.com
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
MW-1 @ 20Description:Lab Sample ID:CF14538-04 09/22/22 13:45Received:
CF14538Work Order:09/22/22 10:26Sampled:SoilMatrix:
76.40% Solids:Justin AbreuSampled By:Project:Coliseum BP #125
[TOC_2]MW-1 @ 20[TOC]
Volatile Organic Compounds by GCMS
^ - ENCO Cary certified analyte [NC 591]
NotesFlagPQLBatchByAnalyzedMethodMDLResultsUnitsDFAnalyte [CAS Number]
mg/kg dry EPA 8260D 09/24/22 00:571,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane [630-20-6]^0.00016 RKY2I230300.00100.00016 U 0.761
mg/kg dry EPA 8260D 09/24/22 00:571,1,1-Trichloroethane [71-55-6]^0.00025 RKY2I230300.00100.00025 U QV-010.761
mg/kg dry EPA 8260D 09/24/22 00:571,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane [79-34-5]^0.00020 RKY2I230300.00100.00020 U 0.761
mg/kg dry EPA 8260D 09/24/22 00:571,1,2-Trichloroethane [79-00-5]^0.00025 RKY2I230300.00100.00025 U 0.761
mg/kg dry EPA 8260D 09/24/22 00:571,1-Dichloroethane [75-34-3]^0.00025 RKY2I230300.00100.00025 U QV-010.761
mg/kg dry EPA 8260D 09/24/22 00:571,1-Dichloroethene [75-35-4]^0.00030 RKY2I230300.00100.00030 U 0.761
mg/kg dry EPA 8260D 09/24/22 00:571,1-Dichloropropene [563-58-6]^0.00016 RKY2I230300.00100.00016 U QV-010.761
mg/kg dry EPA 8260D 09/24/22 00:571,2,3-Trichlorobenzene [87-61-6]^0.00028 RKY2I230300.00100.00028 U 0.761
mg/kg dry EPA 8260D 09/24/22 00:571,2,3-Trichloropropane [96-18-4]^0.00064 RKY2I230300.00100.00064 U 0.761
mg/kg dry EPA 8260D 09/24/22 00:571,2,4-Trichlorobenzene [120-82-1]^0.00027 RKY2I230300.00100.00027 U 0.761
mg/kg dry EPA 8260D 09/24/22 00:571,2,4-Trimethylbenzene [95-63-6]^0.00017 RKY2I230300.00100.0018 0.761
mg/kg dry EPA 8260D 09/24/22 00:571,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane [96-12-8]^0.00079 RKY2I230300.00100.00079 U 0.761
mg/kg dry EPA 8260D 09/24/22 00:571,2-Dibromoethane [106-93-4]^0.00046 RKY2I230300.00100.00046 U 0.761
mg/kg dry EPA 8260D 09/24/22 00:571,2-Dichlorobenzene [95-50-1]^0.00027 RKY2I230300.00100.00027 U 0.761
mg/kg dry EPA 8260D 09/24/22 00:571,2-Dichloroethane [107-06-2]^0.00041 RKY2I230300.00100.00041 U QV-010.761
mg/kg dry EPA 8260D 09/24/22 00:571,2-Dichloropropane [78-87-5]^0.00026 RKY2I230300.00100.00026 U 0.761
mg/kg dry EPA 8260D 09/24/22 00:571,3,5-Trimethylbenzene [108-67-8]^0.00020 RKY2I230300.00100.00052 J 0.761
mg/kg dry EPA 8260D 09/24/22 00:571,3-Dichlorobenzene [541-73-1]^0.00022 RKY2I230300.00100.00022 U 0.761
mg/kg dry EPA 8260D 09/24/22 00:571,3-Dichloropropane [142-28-9]^0.00029 RKY2I230300.00100.00029 U 0.761
mg/kg dry EPA 8260D 09/24/22 00:571,4-Dichlorobenzene [106-46-7]^0.00020 RKY2I230300.00100.00020 U A-070.761
mg/kg dry EPA 8260D 09/24/22 00:572,2-Dichloropropane [594-20-7]^0.00023 RKY2I230300.00100.00023 U QV-010.761
mg/kg dry EPA 8260D 09/24/22 00:572-Butanone [78-93-3]^0.00078 RKY2I230300.00500.00078 U QV-010.761
mg/kg dry EPA 8260D 09/24/22 00:572-Chloroethyl Vinyl Ether [110-75-8]^0.00016 RKY2I230300.00500.00016 U 0.761
mg/kg dry EPA 8260D 09/24/22 00:572-Chlorotoluene [95-49-8]^0.00018 RKY2I230300.00100.00018 U 0.761
mg/kg dry EPA 8260D 09/24/22 00:572-Hexanone [591-78-6]^0.00075 RKY2I230300.00500.00075 U 0.761
mg/kg dry EPA 8260D 09/24/22 00:574-Chlorotoluene [106-43-4]^0.00026 RKY2I230300.00100.00026 U 0.761
mg/kg dry EPA 8260D 09/24/22 00:574-Isopropyltoluene [99-87-6]^0.00016 RKY2I230300.00100.00016 U 0.761
mg/kg dry EPA 8260D 09/24/22 00:574-Methyl-2-pentanone [108-10-1]^0.00057 RKY2I230300.00500.00057 U QV-010.761
mg/kg dry EPA 8260D 09/24/22 00:57Acetone [67-64-1]^0.014 RKY2I230300.0200.014 U QV-010.761
mg/kg dry EPA 8260D 09/24/22 00:57Benzene [71-43-2]^0.00017 RKY2I230300.00100.0081 0.761
mg/kg dry EPA 8260D 09/24/22 00:57Bromobenzene [108-86-1]^0.00022 RKY2I230300.00100.00022 U 0.761
mg/kg dry EPA 8260D 09/24/22 00:57Bromochloromethane [74-97-5]^0.00041 RKY2I230300.00100.00041 U 0.761
mg/kg dry EPA 8260D 09/24/22 00:57Bromodichloromethane [75-27-4]^0.00024 RKY2I230300.00100.00024 U QV-010.761
mg/kg dry EPA 8260D 09/24/22 00:57Bromoform [75-25-2]^0.00045 RKY2I230300.00100.00045 U 0.761
mg/kg dry EPA 8260D 09/24/22 00:57Bromomethane [74-83-9]^0.00032 RKY2I230300.00100.00032 U QV-010.761
mg/kg dry EPA 8260D 09/24/22 00:57Carbon disulfide [75-15-0]^0.00039 RKY2I230300.00500.00039 U 0.761
mg/kg dry EPA 8260D 09/24/22 00:57Carbon Tetrachloride [56-23-5]^0.00022 RKY2I230300.00100.00022 U QV-010.761
mg/kg dry EPA 8260D 09/24/22 00:57Chlorobenzene [108-90-7]^0.00017 RKY2I230300.00100.00017 U 0.761
mg/kg dry EPA 8260D 09/24/22 00:57Chloroethane [75-00-3]^0.00025 RKY2I230300.00100.00025 U QV-010.761
mg/kg dry EPA 8260D 09/24/22 00:57Chloroform [67-66-3]^0.00018 RKY2I230300.00100.00018 U QV-010.761
mg/kg dry EPA 8260D 09/24/22 00:57Chloromethane [74-87-3]^0.00021 RKY2I230300.00100.00021 U 0.761
mg/kg dry EPA 8260D 09/24/22 00:57cis-1,2-Dichloroethene [156-59-2]^0.00023 RKY2I230300.00100.00023 U 0.761
mg/kg dry EPA 8260D 09/24/22 00:57cis-1,3-Dichloropropene [10061-01-5]^0.00017 RKY2I230300.00100.00017 U QV-010.761
mg/kg dry EPA 8260D 09/24/22 00:57Dibromochloromethane [124-48-1]^0.00035 RKY2I230300.00100.00035 U 0.761
mg/kg dry EPA 8260D 09/24/22 00:57Dibromomethane [74-95-3]^0.00033 RKY2I230300.00100.00033 U 0.761
mg/kg dry EPA 8260D 09/24/22 00:57Dichlorodifluoromethane [75-71-8]^0.00045 RKY2I230300.00100.00045 U 0.761
mg/kg dry EPA 8260D 09/24/22 00:57Ethylbenzene [100-41-4]^0.00020 RKY2I230300.00100.0020 0.761
Page 7 of 14This report relates only to the sample as received by the laboratory, and may only be reproduced in full.FINAL Page 7 of 14
www.encolabs.com
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
MW-1 @ 20Description:Lab Sample ID:CF14538-04 09/22/22 13:45Received:
CF14538Work Order:09/22/22 10:26Sampled:SoilMatrix:
76.40% Solids:Justin AbreuSampled By:Project:Coliseum BP #125
Volatile Organic Compounds by GCMS
^ - ENCO Cary certified analyte [NC 591]
NotesFlagPQLBatchByAnalyzedMethodMDLResultsUnitsDFAnalyte [CAS Number]
mg/kg dry EPA 8260D 09/24/22 00:57Hexachlorobutadiene [87-68-3]^0.00035 RKY2I230300.00100.00035 U 0.761
mg/kg dry EPA 8260D 09/24/22 00:57Isopropylbenzene [98-82-8]^0.00015 RKY2I230300.00100.00015 U 0.761
mg/kg dry EPA 8260D 09/24/22 00:57m,p-Xylenes [108-38-3/106-42-3]^0.00037 RKY2I230300.00200.0054 0.761
mg/kg dry EPA 8260D 09/24/22 00:57Methylene Chloride [75-09-2]^0.00073 RKY2I230300.00200.00073 U QV-010.761
mg/kg dry EPA 8260D 09/24/22 00:57Methyl-tert-Butyl Ether [1634-04-4]^0.00030 RKY2I230300.00100.00030 U QV-010.761
mg/kg dry EPA 8260D 09/24/22 00:57Naphthalene [91-20-3]^0.00027 RKY2I230300.00100.00055 J 0.761
mg/kg dry EPA 8260D 09/24/22 00:57n-Butyl Benzene [104-51-8]^0.00013 RKY2I230300.00100.00013 U 0.761
mg/kg dry EPA 8260D 09/24/22 00:57n-Propyl Benzene [103-65-1]^0.00018 RKY2I230300.00100.00018 U 0.761
mg/kg dry EPA 8260D 09/24/22 00:57o-Xylene [95-47-6]^0.00022 RKY2I230300.00100.00022 U 0.761
mg/kg dry EPA 8260D 09/24/22 00:57sec-Butylbenzene [135-98-8]^0.00095 RKY2I230300.00100.00097 J 0.761
mg/kg dry EPA 8260D 09/24/22 00:57Styrene [100-42-5]^0.00098 RKY2I230300.00100.00098 U 0.761
mg/kg dry EPA 8260D 09/24/22 00:57tert-Butylbenzene [98-06-6]^0.00017 RKY2I230300.00100.00017 U 0.761
mg/kg dry EPA 8260D 09/24/22 00:57Tetrachloroethene [127-18-4]^0.00028 RKY2I230300.00100.00028 U 0.761
mg/kg dry EPA 8260D 09/24/22 00:57Toluene [108-88-3]^0.00024 RKY2I230300.00100.00024 U 0.761
mg/kg dry EPA 8260D 09/24/22 00:57trans-1,2-Dichloroethene [156-60-5]^0.00037 RKY2I230300.00100.00037 U QV-010.761
mg/kg dry EPA 8260D 09/24/22 00:57trans-1,3-Dichloropropene [10061-02-6]^0.00039 RKY2I230300.00100.00039 U 0.761
mg/kg dry EPA 8260D 09/24/22 00:57Trichloroethene [79-01-6]^0.00032 RKY2I230300.00100.00032 U 0.761
mg/kg dry EPA 8260D 09/24/22 00:57Trichlorofluoromethane [75-69-4]^0.00026 RKY2I230300.00100.00026 U QV-010.761
mg/kg dry EPA 8260D 09/24/22 00:57Vinyl chloride [75-01-4]^0.00024 RKY2I230300.00100.00024 U 0.761
mg/kg dry EPA 8260D 09/24/22 00:57Xylenes (Total) [1330-20-7]^0.00056 RKY2I230300.00300.0054 0.761
Surrogates Results Spike Lvl % Rec Batch Method Analyzed By% Rec Limits NotesDF
4-Bromofluorobenzene 50-127105 %RKYEPA 8260D 09/24/22 00:572I230305350.0 0.761
Dibromofluoromethane 52-128109 %RKYEPA 8260D 09/24/22 00:572I230305550.0 0.761
Toluene-d8 57-12495 %RKYEPA 8260D 09/24/22 00:572I230304750.0 0.761
Gasoline Range Organics by GC
^ - ENCO Cary certified analyte [NC 591]
NotesFlagPQLBatchByAnalyzedMethodMDLResultsUnitsDFAnalyte [CAS Number]
mg/kg dry EPA 8015C 09/28/22 16:27GRO (C6-C10)^2.0 OWS2I260175.42.0 U 0.755
Surrogates Results Spike Lvl % Rec Batch Method Analyzed By% Rec Limits NotesDF
2,5-Dibromotoluene 59-168109 %OWSEPA 8015C 09/28/22 16:272I26017119.89 0.755
Volatile Petroleum Hydrocarbons by GC
^ - ENCO Cary certified analyte [NC 591]
NotesFlagPQLBatchByAnalyzedMethodMDLResultsUnitsDFAnalyte [CAS Number]
mg/kg dry MAVPH 09/29/22 07:06C5-C8 Aliphatics^0.732 OWS2I270012.970.732 U 0.755
mg/kg dry MAVPH 09/29/22 07:06C9-C10 Aromatics^0.475 OWS2I270010.9891.72 0.755
mg/kg dry MAVPH 09/29/22 07:06C9-C12 Aliphatics^1.48 OWS2I270012.971.48 U 0.755
Surrogates Results Spike Lvl % Rec Batch Method Analyzed By% Rec Limits NotesDF
2,5-Dibromotoluene (FID)70-13081 %OWSMAVPH09/29/22 07:062I270018.04 9.89 0.755
2,5-Dibromotoluene (PID)70-130103 %OWSMAVPH09/29/22 07:062I2700110.2 9.89 0.755
Page 8 of 14This report relates only to the sample as received by the laboratory, and may only be reproduced in full.FINAL Page 8 of 14
www.encolabs.com
QUALITY CONTROL DATA [TOC_1]QC Data[TOC]
Volatile Organic Compounds by GCMS - Quality Control
Batch 2I23030 - EPA 5035_MS
Prepared: 09/23/2022 11:42 Analyzed: 09/23/2022 20:32Blank (2I23030-BLK1)
FlagResult Units Level Result %REC Limits RPD Limit Notes Analyte PQL
Spike Source %REC RPD
mg/kg wet0.00100.00016 U 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane
mg/kg wet0.00100.00025 U 1,1,1-Trichloroethane
mg/kg wet0.00100.00020 U 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
mg/kg wet0.00100.00025 U 1,1,2-Trichloroethane
mg/kg wet0.00100.00025 U 1,1-Dichloroethane
mg/kg wet0.00100.00030 U 1,1-Dichloroethene
mg/kg wet0.00100.00016 U 1,1-Dichloropropene
mg/kg wet0.00100.00028 U 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene
mg/kg wet0.00100.00064 U 1,2,3-Trichloropropane
mg/kg wet0.00100.00027 U 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
mg/kg wet0.00100.00017 U 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene
mg/kg wet0.00100.00079 U 1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane
mg/kg wet0.00100.00046 U 1,2-Dibromoethane
mg/kg wet0.00100.00027 U 1,2-Dichlorobenzene
mg/kg wet0.00100.00041 U 1,2-Dichloroethane
mg/kg wet0.00100.00026 U 1,2-Dichloropropane
mg/kg wet0.00100.00020 U 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene
mg/kg wet0.00100.00022 U 1,3-Dichlorobenzene
mg/kg wet0.00100.00029 U 1,3-Dichloropropane
mg/kg wet0.00100.00020 U 1,4-Dichlorobenzene
mg/kg wet0.00100.00023 U 2,2-Dichloropropane
mg/kg wet0.00500.00078 U 2-Butanone
mg/kg wet0.00500.00016 U 2-Chloroethyl Vinyl Ether
mg/kg wet0.00100.00018 U 2-Chlorotoluene
mg/kg wet0.00500.00075 U 2-Hexanone
mg/kg wet0.00100.00026 U 4-Chlorotoluene
mg/kg wet0.00100.00016 U 4-Isopropyltoluene
mg/kg wet0.00500.00057 U 4-Methyl-2-pentanone
mg/kg wet0.0200.014 U Acetone
mg/kg wet0.00100.00017 U Benzene
mg/kg wet0.00100.00022 U Bromobenzene
mg/kg wet0.00100.00041 U Bromochloromethane
mg/kg wet0.00100.00024 U Bromodichloromethane
mg/kg wet0.00100.00045 U Bromoform
mg/kg wet0.00100.00032 U Bromomethane
mg/kg wet0.00500.00039 U Carbon disulfide
mg/kg wet0.00100.00022 U Carbon Tetrachloride
mg/kg wet0.00100.00017 U Chlorobenzene
mg/kg wet0.00100.00025 U Chloroethane
mg/kg wet0.00100.00018 U Chloroform
mg/kg wet0.00100.00021 U Chloromethane
mg/kg wet0.00100.00023 U cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
mg/kg wet0.00100.00017 U cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
mg/kg wet0.00100.00035 U Dibromochloromethane
mg/kg wet0.00100.00033 U Dibromomethane
mg/kg wet0.00100.00045 U Dichlorodifluoromethane
mg/kg wet0.00100.00020 U Ethylbenzene
mg/kg wet0.00100.00035 U Hexachlorobutadiene
mg/kg wet0.00100.00015 U Isopropylbenzene
Page 9 of 14This report relates only to the sample as received by the laboratory, and may only be reproduced in full.FINAL Page 9 of 14
www.encolabs.com
QUALITY CONTROL DATA
Volatile Organic Compounds by GCMS - Quality Control
Batch 2I23030 - EPA 5035_MS - Continued
Prepared: 09/23/2022 11:42 Analyzed: 09/23/2022 20:32Blank (2I23030-BLK1) Continued
FlagResult Units Level Result %REC Limits RPD Limit Notes Analyte PQL
Spike Source %REC RPD
mg/kg wet0.00200.00037 U m,p-Xylenes
mg/kg wet0.00200.00073 U Methylene Chloride
mg/kg wet0.00100.00030 U Methyl-tert-Butyl Ether
mg/kg wet0.00100.00027 U Naphthalene
mg/kg wet0.00100.00013 U n-Butyl Benzene
mg/kg wet0.00100.00018 U n-Propyl Benzene
mg/kg wet0.00100.00022 U o-Xylene
mg/kg wet0.00100.00095 U sec-Butylbenzene
mg/kg wet0.00100.00098 U Styrene
mg/kg wet0.00100.00017 U tert-Butylbenzene
mg/kg wet0.00100.00028 U Tetrachloroethene
mg/kg wet0.00100.00024 U Toluene
mg/kg wet0.00100.00037 U trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
mg/kg wet0.00100.00039 U trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
mg/kg wet0.00100.00032 U Trichloroethene
mg/kg wet0.00100.00026 U Trichlorofluoromethane
mg/kg wet0.00100.00024 U Vinyl chloride
mg/kg wet0.00300.00056 U Xylenes (Total)
ug/L 50.0 50-1274-Bromofluorobenzene 10050
ug/L 50.0 52-128Dibromofluoromethane10553
ug/L 50.0 57-124Toluene-d8 9346
Prepared: 09/23/2022 11:42 Analyzed: 09/23/2022 18:19LCS (2I23030-BS1)
FlagResult Units Level Result %REC Limits RPD Limit Notes Analyte PQL
Spike Source %REC RPD
mg/kg wet0.0010 0.0200 64-1331070.021 1,1-Dichloroethene
mg/kg wet0.0010 0.0200 79-129970.019 Benzene
mg/kg wet0.0010 0.0200 79-121820.016 Chlorobenzene
mg/kg wet0.0010 0.0200 77-120830.017 Toluene
mg/kg wet0.0010 0.0200 78-1201020.020 Trichloroethene
ug/L 50.0 50-1274-Bromofluorobenzene 10351
ug/L 50.0 52-128Dibromofluoromethane10351
ug/L 50.0 57-124Toluene-d8 9949
Prepared: 09/23/2022 11:42 Analyzed: 09/23/2022 18:53Matrix Spike (2I23030-MS1)
Source: CF14027-07
FlagResult Units Level Result %REC Limits RPD Limit Notes Analyte PQL
Spike Source %REC RPD
mg/kg wet0.0010 0.0200 64-1331120.00030 U0.022 1,1-Dichloroethene
mg/kg wet0.0010 0.0200 79-1291010.00017 U0.020 Benzene
mg/kg wet0.0010 0.0200 79-121840.00017 U0.017 Chlorobenzene
mg/kg wet0.0010 0.0200 77-120840.00024 U0.017 Toluene
mg/kg wet0.0010 0.0200 78-1201010.00032 U0.020 Trichloroethene
ug/L 50.0 50-1274-Bromofluorobenzene 10251
ug/L 50.0 52-128Dibromofluoromethane11155
ug/L 50.0 57-124Toluene-d8 9849
Page 10 of 14This report relates only to the sample as received by the laboratory, and may only be reproduced in full.FINAL Page 10 of 14
www.encolabs.com
QUALITY CONTROL DATA
Volatile Organic Compounds by GCMS - Quality Control
Batch 2I23030 - EPA 5035_MS - Continued
Prepared: 09/23/2022 11:42 Analyzed: 09/23/2022 19:26Matrix Spike Dup (2I23030-MSD1)
Source: CF14027-07
FlagResult Units Level Result %REC Limits RPD Limit Notes Analyte PQL
Spike Source %REC RPD
mg/kg wet0.0010 0.0200 2364-133108 40.00030 U0.022 1,1-Dichloroethene
mg/kg wet0.0010 0.0200 2379-12993 80.00017 U0.019 Benzene
mg/kg wet0.0010 0.0200 2579-12178 70.00017 U0.016 QM-07Chlorobenzene
mg/kg wet0.0010 0.0200 2377-12081 30.00024 U0.016 Toluene
mg/kg wet0.0010 0.0200 2478-12098 30.00032 U0.020 Trichloroethene
ug/L 50.0 50-1274-Bromofluorobenzene 10251
ug/L 50.0 52-128Dibromofluoromethane10553
ug/L 50.0 57-124Toluene-d8 9548
Gasoline Range Organics by GC - Quality Control
Batch 2I26017 - EPA 5035
Prepared: 09/26/2022 14:58 Analyzed: 09/28/2022 13:34Blank (2I26017-BLK1)
FlagResult Units Level Result %REC Limits RPD Limit Notes Analyte PQL
Spike Source %REC RPD
mg/kg wet5.52.0 U GRO (C6-C10)
mg/kg wet 9.69 59-1682,5-Dibromotoluene 949.1
Prepared: 09/26/2022 14:58 Analyzed: 09/28/2022 12:34LCS (2I26017-BS1)
FlagResult Units Level Result %REC Limits RPD Limit Notes Analyte PQL
Spike Source %REC RPD
mg/kg wet5.5 47.7 51-12011253 GRO (C6-C10)
mg/kg wet 9.54 59-1682,5-Dibromotoluene 989.4
Prepared: 09/26/2022 14:58 Analyzed: 09/28/2022 14:09Matrix Spike (2I26017-MS1)
Source: CF14529-07
FlagResult Units Level Result %REC Limits RPD Limit Notes Analyte PQL
Spike Source %REC RPD
mg/kg wet5.5 49.1 45-1621222.0 U60 GRO (C6-C10)
mg/kg wet 9.82 59-1682,5-Dibromotoluene 10911
Prepared: 09/26/2022 14:58 Analyzed: 09/28/2022 14:44Matrix Spike Dup (2I26017-MSD1)
Source: CF14529-07
FlagResult Units Level Result %REC Limits RPD Limit Notes Analyte PQL
Spike Source %REC RPD
mg/kg wet5.5 48.5 2445-162121 22.0 U59 GRO (C6-C10)
mg/kg wet 9.71 59-1682,5-Dibromotoluene 11311
Volatile Petroleum Hydrocarbons by GC - Quality Control
Batch 2I27001 - EPA 5035
Prepared: 09/27/2022 07:09 Analyzed: 09/28/2022 13:00Blank (2I27001-BLK1)
FlagResult Units Level Result %REC Limits RPD Limit Notes Analyte PQL
Spike Source %REC RPD
mg/kg wet3.000.740 U C5-C8 Aliphatics
mg/kg wet1.000.480 U C9-C10 Aromatics
mg/kg wet3.001.50 U C9-C12 Aliphatics
Page 11 of 14This report relates only to the sample as received by the laboratory, and may only be reproduced in full.FINAL Page 11 of 14
www.encolabs.com
QUALITY CONTROL DATA
Volatile Petroleum Hydrocarbons by GC - Quality Control
Batch 2I27001 - EPA 5035 - Continued
Prepared: 09/27/2022 07:09 Analyzed: 09/28/2022 13:00Blank (2I27001-BLK1) Continued
FlagResult Units Level Result %REC Limits RPD Limit Notes Analyte PQL
Spike Source %REC RPD
mg/kg wet 9.58 70-1302,5-Dibromotoluene (FID)787.45
mg/kg wet 9.58 70-1302,5-Dibromotoluene (PID)908.61
Prepared: 09/27/2022 07:09 Analyzed: 09/28/2022 11:15LCS (2I27001-BS1)
FlagResult Units Level Result %REC Limits RPD Limit Notes Analyte PQL
Spike Source %REC RPD
mg/kg wet3.00 11.9 70-1309210.9 C5-C8 Aliphatics
mg/kg wet1.00 3.95 70-1301224.81 C9-C10 Aromatics
mg/kg wet3.00 11.9 70-13010112.0 C9-C12 Aliphatics
mg/kg wet 9.88 70-1302,5-Dibromotoluene (FID)878.56
mg/kg wet 9.88 70-1302,5-Dibromotoluene (PID)979.57
Prepared: 09/27/2022 07:09 Analyzed: 09/28/2022 12:14LCS Dup (2I27001-BSD1)
FlagResult Units Level Result %REC Limits RPD Limit Notes Analyte PQL
Spike Source %REC RPD
mg/kg wet3.00 11.7 2570-13089 410.4 C5-C8 Aliphatics
mg/kg wet1.00 3.90 2570-130121 24.73 C9-C10 Aromatics
mg/kg wet3.00 11.7 2570-13098 511.4 C9-C12 Aliphatics
mg/kg wet 9.75 70-1302,5-Dibromotoluene (FID)939.07
mg/kg wet 9.75 70-1302,5-Dibromotoluene (PID)1029.96
Page 12 of 14This report relates only to the sample as received by the laboratory, and may only be reproduced in full.FINAL Page 12 of 14
www.encolabs.com
FLAGS/NOTES AND DEFINITIONS [TOC_1]Flags/Notes[TOC]
The sample was analyzed at dilution.
The analyte was detected in the associated method blank.
The reported value is between the laboratory method detection limit (MDL) and the laboratory method
reporting limit (MRL), adjusted for actual sample preparation data and moisture content, where applicable.
The analyte was analyzed for but not detected to the level shown, adjusted for actual sample preparation
data and moisture content, where applicable.
The concentration indicated for this analyte is an estimated value above the calibration range of the
instrument. This value is considered an estimate.
Method Reporting Limit. The MRL is roughly equivalent to the practical quantitation limit (PQL) and is
based on the low point of the calibration curve, when applicable, sample preparation factor, dilution
factor, and, in the case of soil samples, moisture content.
MRL
E
U
J
D
B
N The analysis indicates the presence of an analyte for which there is presumptive evidence (85% or greater
confidence) to make a tentative identification".
P Greater than 25% concentration difference was observed between the primary and secondary GC column.
The lower concentration is reported.
PQL: Practical Quantitation Limit. The PQL presented is the laboratory MRL.PQL
Calculated analyte - MDL/MRL reported to the highest reporting limit of the component analyses.[CALC]
Analyte biased low in LCS but detected in the reporting limit standard. Since the analyte in the associated
sample was not detected, there is no impact on data quality.
A-07
The spike recovery was outside acceptance limits for the MS and/or MSD. The batch was accepted based
on acceptable LCS recovery.
QM-07
The associated continuing calibration verification standard exhibited high bias; since the result is ND, there
is no impact.
QV-01
Page 13 of 14This report relates only to the sample as received by the laboratory, and may only be reproduced in full.FINAL Page 13 of 14
Page 14 of 14
Page 1 of 16
Page 2 of 16
Page 3 of 16
Page 4 of 16
Page 5 of 16
Page 6 of 16
Page 7 of 16
Page 8 of 16
Page 9 of 16
Page 10 of 16
Page 11 of 16
Page 12 of 16
Page 13 of 16
Page 14 of 16
Page 15 of 16
Page 16 of 16