25009_East Side Truck Svc_Abatement Rpt (OAR)_20200716

40- WithersRavenel
110 Our People. Your Success.
July 16, 2020
Naman Hotels
2200-A David McLeod Blvd
Florence, SC 29501
Attn: Mr. Nick Patel
RE: Initial Abatement Action Report
Carter Property/Eastern Trucking
Cumberland County, North Carolina
WR Project No. 03200022.01
Mr. Patel:
WithersRavenel (WR) is pleased to submit this report describing the Initial Abatement Actions Report for
the above -referenced property.
These activities were completed to evaluate soil and groundwater conditions relative to waste stored onsite
in a former aboveground storage tank (AST). This report summarizes the results of WR's field activities and
presents the findings of the assessment of existing environmental conditions at the site.
If you have any questions or comments, please feel free to contact me.
Sincerely,
WithersRavenel
,u qkk
Stan H. Harts
Project Geologist - Environmental Professional
R.S. (Butch) Lawter, Jr., P.E.
Senior Engineer - Environmental Professional
Director of Environmental Services
219 Station Road, Suite 100 1 Wilmington, NC 28405
t: 919.469.3340 1 f: 919.467.6008 1 www.withersravenel.com I License No. C-0832
Cary I Greensboro I Pittsboro I Raleigh I Wilmington I Asheville

4400� WithersRavenel
Our People. Your Success.
INITIAL ABATEMENT ACTION REPORT
Carter Property/Eastern Trucking
520 Judson Church Road
Fayetteville, Cumberland County, North Carolina
WR Project No. 03200022.01
Prepared For:
Naman Hotels
2200-A David McLeod Boulevard
Florence, SC 29501
Prepared by:
WithersRavenel
219 Station Road, Suite 100
Wilmington, North Carolina 28405
North Carolina Firm License No. C-0832
July 16, 2020

::WithersRavenel
Our People. Your Success.
SITE INFORMATION
Site Identification
Date of Report: July 16, 2020
Facility ID: N/A Incident Number:
Not Applicable
Site Risk: Not Assigned Rank:
Not Assigned
Site Name: Former Eastern Trucking Land Use Class:
Commercial
Site Street Address: 520 Judson Church Road
Site City/Town: Fayetteville Zip: 28312
County: Cumberland
Description of Geographical Data Point: Approximate Center of Spill
Location Method: Google Earth
Latitude: N 35.009176 Longitude:
W 78.816012
Information about Contacts Associated with the Leaking AST System
AST Owner/Operator: Misty Carter
6914 Gearhart Street
Fayetteville, NC 28312
Tel: [phone]
Property Owners/Occupants: Vacant
Address:
Tel: N/A
Consultant/Contractor: WithersRavenel, Inc.
Address: 219 Station Road, Suite 100
Tel: [phone]
Wilmington, NC 28405
Analytical Laboratories: REDLab, LLC
Address: 5598 Marvin Moss Lane
Tel: [phone]
Wilmington, NC 28409
Eurofins Xenco
4147 Greenbriar Dr.
Stafford, TX 77477
GC/MS: NC Certification 483
Information about Release
Date Discovered:
Estimated Quantity of Release:
Cause of Release:
Source of Release:
Size(s) & Content(s) of AST system(s) from which
release occurred:
Criteria Used to Classify Risk:
Information about IAA Report
Date(s) of Assessment/Monitoring Event(s):
Certification
)J6�z'�v 9�k
Former Eastern Trucking, Fayetteville, NC
Initial Abatement Action Report
January 30, 2020
Unknown
Leak
Overfill of Waste Oil AST
(1) -250-gallon AST
N/A
January 30 & July 2-9, 2020
WR Project # 0320022.01
July 2020
Page 1 of 5

::WithersRavenel
Our People. Your Success.
Background
A release to the environment occurred related to overfills of a waste oil AST at the subject site during former
vehicle maintenance activities. Previous soil sampling confirmed these impacts. This report outlines
mitigation efforts that have been effective to the extent possible based on on -site conditions as confirmed
by laboratory analytical results. Site operations have been suspended and the owner removed the AST from
the site. Approximately 18.5 tons of impacted soils were removed on July 2, 2020. A permanent monitoring
well was installed near the former AST and the only constituent identified was tetrachloroethylene, also
known as perchloroethylene (PCE) at levels approximately four times above NC 2L regulatory limits. The
source of PCE is unknown but is suspected to be related to parts washing activities and/or disposal of items
other than waste oil in the waste oil stream. Additional assessment is recommended before closure is
possible.
Site History and Characterization
The site is located approximately 1,000 feet north of the intersection of Judson Church Road and NC
Highway 53 at 520 Judson Church Road, Fayetteville, Cumberland County, North Carolina (Figure 1). The
Cumberland County GIS website provides the following information on the subject property:
1 0455-58-0008- Misty and Terry Carter 520 Judson Church Road ±2.90
An expanded Phase I ESA was conducted on the site in December of 2019 by J.N. Pease Environmental
Group. This assessment identified a former liquid propane gas AST that had been converted to a waste oil
container to support the former site operations as Eastern Trucking. During this assessment, soil samples
were collected and the presence of total chromium, Benzene, 1-Methylnaphalene, and Benoz(a))pyrene
were detected above action levels in the soils adjacent to the AST.
In January of 2020, WR conducted a limited Phase II ESA at the site to determine potential soil and
groundwater impacts at the site. This report identified the presence of soil impacted by waste oils adjacent
to the AST and partially determined the extent of contaminated soil at the site. It also identified the presence
of Methylene Chloride and PCE at concentrations above NC 2L regulatory standards in a temporary well in
the area. A copy of this report is included as Appendix D. This report suggested excavation and disposal and
installation of permanent monitoring well following excavation. This report summarizes those activities.
Field Assessment Activities
On January 30, 2020, WR, conducted a limited Phase II ESA. This report satisfies the requirements of a Site
Check Report and is included in Appendix D. In summary, five soil borings were installed across the site
utilizing a track -mounted GeoProbe® drill rig, and these borings were sampled for Total Petroleum
Hydrocarbons (TPH) gasoline range organics (GRO) and diesel range organics (DRO) by Ultraviolet
Fluorescence (UVF) methodology. SB-1 was also submitted under chain -of -custody protocols to Xenco in
Tampa, FL for analysis of Lead & Chromium by EPA Method 6010C as a means to establish onsite natural
levels of those targeted metals. Two depths of SB-3 (2.5' and 5' BLS) were further submitted under chain -
Former Eastern Trucking, Fayetteville, NC
Initial Abatement Action Report
WR Project # 0320022.01
July 2020
Page 2 of 5

WithersRavenel
Our People. Your Success.
of -custody protocols to Xenco in Tampa, FL for analysis of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) by EPA
Method 8260B, semi-VOCs (SVOCs) by EPA Method 8270D, MADEP Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons
(EPH) & Volatile Petroleum Hydrocarbons (VPH), and Lead & Chromium by EPA Method 6010C.
Groundwater assessment activities were completed with a track -mounted GeoProbe® drill rig using direct
push methods to extend SB-1 and SB-3 into the surficial aquifer beneath the site. The borings were
converted to temporary monitoring wells TW-1 and TW-2, respectively. The location of SB-1 was chosen
as a background sample for the targeted metal compounds and the location of TW-2 in SB-3 was chosen
based on the PID readings of the screened soils.
The temporary wells were constructed with 1" diameter PVC screen section extending from the base of the
boring and connected to 1" diameter PVC risers extending to surface grade. Following purging and
collection, both groundwater samples were analyzed for Lead & Chromium by EPA Method 6010C. The
sample collected from TW-2 was also analyzed for VOCs by EPA Method 8260B, SVOCs by EPA method
8270D, and MADEP EPH/VPH.
This area identified the presence of an area of contaminated soils associated with overfills of the AST and
the presence of metals and petroleum hydrocarbons in the soil and solvents in groundwater. Between
February 2020 and June of 2020, the AST was pumped of its contents and removed from the site by the
owner to facilitate soil excavation and removal.
Initial Response and Abatement Action
On July 2, 2020, WR mobilized to the subject property with SR&R Environmental (SR&R) to remove
impacted soils from the area of release. SR&R removed approximately 18.5 tons of impacted soils from the
area of release. The excavation was approximately 20 feet by 10 feet and four feet deep. Groundwater was
not encountered during the excavation. Disposal manifests are provided in Appendix A. Following
excavation, backfill in the form of crushed stone and sand was placed in the excavation pit.
Following the removal of impacted soils, five sidewall/floor samples (NORTH, EAST, SOUTH, WEST, and
BASE) were collected, and field screened with a field calibrated Photoionization Detector (PID). Field
screening was conducted by placing the soil sample in a sealed Ziplock back and being allowed to volatilize
for at least 10 minutes and the headspace screened using a PID. The collected soil samples were submitted
for analysis of total petroleum hydrocarbons - gasoline range organics and diesel range organics (TPH-GRO
and DRO) by UVF methods by REDLab, LLC. The sample taken from the south wall was taken from the
sidewall that was approximately four inches behind the concrete slab of the building (2.5 feet below land
surface) and further excavation was not possible due to structural collapse risk.
All laboratory analyses of the submitted samples did not reveal any TPH-GRO and/or TPH-DRO
concentrations above current NCDEQ Action Levels except for the SOUTH sample that was taken under
the building slab. This sample identified Diesel Range Organics at levels below action levels and Gasoline
Range Organics at 144.5 mg/Kg approximately three times the regulatory limit but further excavation was
not possible as stated above.
One sample (SOURCE) was collected in the spill area before excavation activities to establish a baseline for
the post -excavation samples and for disposal characterization. As required by the disposal contractor, the
source sample was also analyzed utilizing a Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure (TCLP) for 8 RCRA
metals. The area is served by municipal water supply, but there was an inactive drinking water well located
approximately 30 feet east of the excavation. No other wells were identified within 500 feet of the source
during the assessment, however, there are approximately five residences within 500 feet north of the site
that may have water supply or irrigation wells.
Former Eastern Trucking, Fayetteville, NC
Initial Abatement Action Report
WR Project # 0320022.01
July 2020
Page 3 of 5

::WithersRavenel
Our People. Your Success.
Figure 3 provides a layout of the excavation, soil sample locations, and analytical results. The laboratory
analytical reports are included in Appendix A. A photographic record is included in Appendix C.
Groundwater and Surface Water Investigation
On July 9, 2020, WR mobilized to the site with Quantex Drilling to install a Type II permanent monitoring
well. Since the well was installed as close to the source as possible and in the excavation, area recently filled
with crushed gravel and sand, soil sampling was not possible due to caving concerns. Hollow stem augers
were advanced to a depth of 20 feet below land surface, and 15 feet of 2" diameter threaded PVC slotted
screen was placed in the boring followed by five feet of PVC riser. The well was completed with a sand pack
to approximately two feet above the screened interval and then two feet of bentonite. The well was
completed with a concrete pad, bolt -down, flush cover, and a locking expansion cap.
Soils encountered were yellow to tan clayey sands and water levels rose to approximately eight feet below
land surface. According to the Geologic Map of North Carolina, the area is underlain by the Cretaceous Cape
Fear Formation that is sandstone and sandy mudstone in lithology.
Before purging and sampling each well, the depth to groundwater within the well was gauged utilizing an
electronic water level indicator. The water level measured approximately 8.42 feet below land surface (BLS).
No determination of groundwater flow was made based on well gauging. Following installation, the well was
purged using a peristaltic pump and virgin disposable polyethylene (PE) tubing until the turbidity was below
10 nephelometric turbidity units (NTUs) and placed into a clean laboratory supplied containers.
Following collection, groundwater samples were placed on ice within a cooler and ultimately submitted
under chain -of -custody protocols to Eurofins/Xenco Laboratories in Stafford, TX, for analysis of Volatile
Organic Compounds (VOCs) by EPA Method 8260D and Semivolatile Organic Compounds (SVOCs) by EPA
Method 8270D as well as Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Extractable Petroleum
Hydrocarbons and Volatile Petroleum Hydrocarbons methodologies and 8 RCRA Metals by EPA Method
6020A. A copy of the chain -of -custody record is included with analytical data in Appendix B.
Analytical results indicated the presence of volatile organic compounds, chloroform, and PCE above
laboratory detection limits. MW-1 had 2.90 ug/L of PCE, approximately four times the NC 2L regulatory
limit of 0.7 ug/L. This level is below the gross contaminant limit of 700 ug/L.
Additionally, analyses detected the presence of volatile petroleum hydrocarbons, barium, chromium, and
lead but all well below the regulatory limits for each of these constituents and all except barium above
detection limits but below quantitation limits (J flagged).
At no point during any assessment activities have non -aqueous phase liquids been encountered at the site.
Former Eastern Trucking, Fayetteville, NC
Initial Abatement Action Report
WR Project # 0320022.01
July 2020
Page 4 of 5

::WithersRavenel
Our People. Your Success.
Conclusions and Recommendations
Petroleum releases to the soil from overfills of a waste oil AST at the site used during former vehicle
maintenance activities have been mitigated to the extent possible, with only a small portion remaining under
the building foundation. Approximately 18.5 tons of impacted soils were removed on July 2, 2020. The
source of contamination has been removed. The sampling of groundwater from a monitoring well in the
vicinity does identify the presence of PCE at levels approximately four times above NC 2L regulatory limits.
The source of PCE is unknown but is suspected to be related to parts washing activities and/or disposal of
items other than waste oil in the waste oil stream. The AST and contaminated soil have been removed to
the extent practical, so it is not a continuing source.
WR recommends the following at a minimum.
1.) Report the findings to the NCDEQ UST section who also manages AST releases. They will most
likely not require additional actions for the petroleum release but will refer it to another unit that
will address the solvents.
2.) Abandon the nearby inactive water supply well immediately to prevent it from being a conduit for
contaminants.
3.) Consider additional assessment including the installation of at least three more wells to determine
the extent of groundwater contamination and the direction of groundwater flow.
If you have any questions, comments, or concerns regarding this report, please contact us at (910) 899-
4619.
Sincerely,
WithersRavenel
5;i� -
Austin Pote
Staff Engineer
Attachments: Figures & Appendices
J&�Z' �U �V�
Stan H. Harts, P.G. CSP
Project Geologist
Former Eastern Trucking, Fayetteville, NC WR Project # 0320022.01
Initial Abatement Action Report July 2020
Page 5 of 5

FIGURES

- S"'NYSIDF CHURCH RD�
(IQp
RD�;,,
_LLe-
46-
fAR4f'
a � a
i
C53
10i
O
a
SUBJECT SITE
±2.90 ACRES
�I
oil
Judson
- GRAPHIC SCALE
0 500 1000 2000
I
1 inch = 1000 ft.
CARTER PROPERTY DRAWN BY SCALE FIGURE NO.
W i t h e rs Ra ve n e l
1/ 520JUDSONCHURCHROAD AP 1"=1000' 1
ineers Engors FAYETTEVILLE, CUMBERLAND COUNTY, NC
b I Planners I Surveyors APPROVED BY: DATE: PROJECT NO.:
115 MacKenan Drive I Cary, NC 275111 t: 919.469.3340 I license #: C-0832 GENERAL LOCATION MAP SH 02/17/2020 03200022.00
ww w. w t h e rs ra v e n e I. c o m
Y7.\i0V0-0070\700077-NYmM MeW SW 1\Em%e\ft ! \CW\►4Wftdn- PGWW v 17. 2020 - Pp1E. WS1N

11VII f
SUBJECT SITE
±2.90 ACRES
WASTE OIL AST
UNDEVELOPED WOODLAND R
�C
kRFAq/RF
/ i►r q%/T
JUDSON
BAPTIST
CHURCH
UNDEVELOPED WOODLANDS
TRUVHILTON
UNDEVELOPED WOODLANDS
MPTON INN &SUITESGRAPHIC SCALE
0 75 150 30DAYS INN BY WYNDHAM
1 inch = 150 ft.
DRAWN BY: SCALE: FIGURE NO.:
W i t h e rs Ra ve n e l CARTER PROPERTY AP 1°=150 ' 2
I / Engineers I Planners I Surveyors 520 JUDSON CHURCH ROAD SITE MAP
FAYETTEVILLE, CUMBERLAND COUNTY, NC APPROVED BY : DATEPROJECT NO.:
:
115 MacKenan Drive I Cary, NC 275111 t 919.469.33401 license S: C-0832 SH 02/17/2020 03200022.00
-ithersravenel.com
Mc\20\20-0020\300022-4b Holft Sol MM\EM \PhM 1\GW%F*w "- Ptbwh 17. 2020 - POM ^Z1

�
o
0
N S
O CV)
O O
O Q
Z
O XL -
EXCAVATION AREA
o _
a a
O
N
O
N
ON
10 y
WESTQ NORTH
Z11
e >
o ^
o
FLOOR Q
m g
Q
m
a
a u
3 °
111111M
SOUTH 'IS
Q EAST
o a
a �
TR�c
Z
kRFAq/
O
W
R �qc/<,ry
#
Q
Ou
W
j,
��
U
Z
oz
Q�
� 00
W p
0.
Ogg
= w
aUm
IOC o 5
W N U
0
L
�/ J
li J
O
Q N W
■
Q
u
^�
SB-1
W
C
v M
E
\ Z) � o
o o,
TI " c
V - , w
a,
C �
l/1 rp "^ y
� N •-
3
fL_ a
ry
z
1.1 N
LEGEND
jam'
; o
Y %41
Q EXCAVATION SAMPLE LOCATION
c"
GRAPHIC SCALE
Y v
SOIL BORING LOCATION
0 10
20
40
NOTES:
,,
1.) LOCATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE AND NOT EXACT.
1 inch = 20 ft.
Client Sample t[]
Soil -to -Water
Maximum
Contaminant
Concentration
(mglkg}
Residential Soil.
Cleanup Levels .
�mglkgy
SB-1 {2.5'}
5B-3 {2.5'}
SB-3 {5'j
Collection Date
_-_
Method Parameter CAS #
1130I2t}20
1130I2[]2t7
11317I2t}2t}
(nTglkg}
qual
{nlglkg}
qual
(mg/kg)
Dual
Volatile
Organic Compounds {VOCsj
8260B
N-8utylber¢ene
10451-8
3626
NA
0.0332
BDL
8260B
Sec-8utylhenzene
13�98-8
10Q-41.4
3
r4.9
fi26
1,560
NA
NA
0.014
BDL
82605
Ethylhenzene
U.0183
BDL
8260E
Isopropylbenzene
98-82-8
7
1,554
NA
O.D0681
8DL
8260E
F'-Isopropyltoluene
99-87-6
0-12
100
NA
0.00701
8DL
8260B
Naphthalene
91-243
0-16_
1.7
313
S26 =
NA
0.0237
4.0013
J
82®08
N-Propylbenzene
10�6�1
NA
0.0184
8DL
82608
Tetrachbroethene
127-iB-4
0.0074
1.1❑
NA
2.8fi
❑
8❑L
82608
Toluene
108-88.3
4.3
1,200
NA
U.0266
8DL
82608
1,2,4-Trimelhylhenzene
85-636
8.5
782
NA
0.392
D
8DL
8260B
1,3,�Trimethylbenzene
108-67-8
8-3
782 _
MA
O.S2d
❑
BDL
�82608
xylenes, Total
1330-2a7
j 4.B
3,129
NA
0.234
BDL
B260B
Rema[ning Targeted VpCs
-
-
NA
BDL
BDL
5en�i-Volatile Organic Compounds {SVOGs}
821u1] Pyrene �zs-oD-a
270
4G9
NA
V.251
J
BDL
8270� Rema[n+ng '!'argeted SVOCs
-
-
NA
BDL
BDL
AQEP VPHIEPH
-
VPH C�C8 Akphatics
58
939
NA
B❑L
BDL
VPWEPH C&C16Atiphati�s
--
540
]-SOD
NA
279
D
BDL
EPH C19-C36 Aliphatics
NL
33000
NA
2180
❑
8DL
VPWEPH C&C22 Aromatics
31
459
NA
443.1
BDL
Meta
60iDC Cr[romum
74a0.47.3
�.a 47
3-21 7.04 3.6Z
�-58 J d.78 2.07 J
1601OC
Lead
7439-97-fi
27d
400
Notes
Value =Reportable concentration detected
Value = Reportable Concentration was detected above Soil -to -Water Maximum Contaminant Concentrations
Value =Reportable Concentration was detected above Residential Soil Cleanup Levels
Qualifiers: Q =The sample(s) were diluted due to targets detected over the highest point of the calibration curve, or due to matrix interference. dilution factors are
included in the final results. The result is from a diluted sample.
J =The target analyte was positively identified below the quantitatian limit and above the detection limit.
NA Not Analyzed
NIL Not Listed
mg/kg Milligrams per fGlogram
BDL Beiow Laborato Qetectian Limits
SOIL SAMPLE
PATE
SAMPLE DEPTH
TPHIGRO
TPHIRRO
ID
!feet BLS)
lmglkgj
[mglkgj
SB-1
1/30/2020
3
BDL
BDL
SB-2
1/30/2020
3
BDL
BDL
SB-3
1/30/2020
3
43.3
502.4
SB-4
1/30/2020
3
41.9
526.4
SB-5
1/30/2020
3
BDL
BDL
NORTH
7/2/2020
2.5
7.6
2.6
EAST
7/2/2020
2.5
BDL
BDL
SOUTH
7/2/2020
2.5
144.5
45.2
WEST
7/2/2020
2.5
1.3
4
BASE
7/2/2020
4.5
BDL
1.2
NCDEQ Action Levels
50
100
Notes: 1 - NIA � Not Applicable or Sampled
2 •Results �n hold exceed laboratory detection limits.
3 -Results shaded bold exceed the NCDEQ action leve[-
4 -BLS =Below Land Surface.
5 -Results are in mg/kg {milligrams per kilogram}.
6 -Soil samples were collected January 3D, 2D2D.
7 -TPH =Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons
8 -BDL =Below Detection Limits
4 • GRO =Gasoline Range organics
10 - DRO � Diesel Range Organics

o
o �
O
N g
N
p R
z
w o
° O
0
o
0
N
_
N
n
oLi
o o �
TW-2/MW-1
m
®
,
m
3 Q
o
'o Ln
qST
a
o
a
a
Vf �H
J
TLLJ
Vf
kRFAg14
�
�
G
Z
O
U
z
F
pz
Q'
W p0
-
0
O<
cc = w
aUm
CC o D
y� Ln U
H°w
w/ J
a�W
U�r
}
a
N
TW-1
C
E
\ O
/
ro — C
� �/ rn v
C .-y
z 3
/L
LEGEND
v U N
>>_ o
® TYPE -II MONITORING WELL LOCATION
�° ,
w
TEMPORARY MONITORING WELL LOCATION
GRAPHIC SCALE
Y v
0 10 20
40
IONS ARE APPROXIMATE AND NOT EXACT.
LL2)NSTALLEDIN THE SAME LOCATION AS TW-2.
,,
1 inch = 20 ft.
Sample ID
TW-1
TW-2
MW-1
Date Collected
113Q12Q2Q
113Q12Q2Q
71912Q2Q
Analytical Method
Compound Name
CAS
NC 2L (uglLj
GCL �uglLj
Result [uglL}
Qualifier
Result {uglL}
Qualifier
Result {uglL}
Qualifier
Chloroform
57-56-3
70
7OOQO
NA
NA
1.36
82baD -Volatile
Bromomethane
74-83-9
SOD
iDOODD
NA
1.94
BDL
Methylene Chloride
75-Q9-2
5
SOOD
NA
176
D
BDL
Organic Compounds
[VOCs}
Tetrachloraethene
127-18-4
D.7
7O0
NA
21.7
2.9
Remaining Targeted VOCs
NA
BDL
BDL
827DE - Semi-VCrCs
[SVOCs}
All Targeted SVOCs
NA
B1]t
BDL
C5-C8 Aliphatics
---
4O0
NIL _
NA
BDL
8DL
MADE �
C9-C18 Aliphatics
---
7OO
NL
NA
BDL
BDL
ER1-i1VPFi
C19-C36Aliphatics
---
iDODD
NIL
NA
BDL
BDL
C9-C22 Aromatics
---
2OO
NIL
NA
BDL
BDL
Barium
744fl-39-3
7OO
700000
NIA
NIA
29.5
6010C -Metals
Chromium
744Q-47-3
iD
1OOflD
14.2
9.3
0.567
Lead
7439-97-6
15
15ODO
7.4
2.75
0.194
Notes:
1} All results provided in uglL {micrograms per liter} or parts per billion
2} BDL = Below Detection Limits
3} NC 2L - North Carolina Groundwater Quality Standard as per NC Administrative Code 15A NCAC D2L
4} GCLs - NCDEQ UST Section Grass Contamination Levels for Groundwater
5} Chemical Abstract Service {CAS} Registry Numbers shown for compounds targeted
by analyses
6} NA = Not Analyzed
7} NL = No Listed Regulatory Standard for the Compound Shown
Qualifiers:
D =The sample[sj were diluted due to targets detected over the highest point of the calibration curve,
or due to matrix interference.
Dilution factors are
included in the final results. The result is from a diluted sample.
Result
=Result Exceeds Laboratory Detection Limits
Result
=Result Exceeds 2L Standard {See Note 3, above}
gesult
=Result Exceeds GCLs (See Note 4, above}

TABLES

Table 1A
Summary of Soil Analytical Results (TPH)
Carter Property
520 Judson Church Road
Fayetteville, Cumberland County, North Carolina
WR Project # 03200022.01
SAMPLE DEPTH
TPH/GRO
TPH/DRO
SOIL SAMPLE ID
DATE
(feet BLS)
(mg/kg)
(mg/kg)
SB-1
1/30/2020
3
BDL
BDL
SB-2
1/30/2020
3
BDL
BDL
SB-3
1/30/2020
3
43.3
502.4
SB-4
1/30/2020
3
41.9
526.9
SB-5
1/30/2020
3
BDL
BDL
NORTH
7/2/2020
2.5
7.6
2.6
EAST
7/2/2020
2.5
BDL
BDL
SOUTH
7/2/2020
2.5
144.5
46.2
WEST
7/2/2020
2.5
1.3
4
FLOOR
7/2/2020
4.5
BDL
1.2
NCDEQ Action Levels
50
100
Notes:
1 -
N/A = Not Applicable or Sampled
2 -
Results in bold exceed laboratory detection limits.
3 -
Results shaded exceed the NCDEQ action level.
4 -
BLS = Below Land Surface.
5 -
Results are in mg/kg (milligrams per kilogram).
6 -
Soil samples were collected January 30, 2020.
7 -
TPH = Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons
8 -
BDL = Below Detection Limits
9 -
GRO = Gasoline Range Organics
10
- DRO = Diesel Range Organics

Table 113
Summary of Soil Analytical Results (VOCs, SVOCs, EPH/VPH, & Metals)
Carter Property
520 Judson Church Road
Fayetteville, Cumberland County, North Carolina
WR Proiect # 03200022.01
Client Sample ID
Soil -to -Water
Maximum
Contaminant
Concentration
(mg/kg)
SB-1 (2.5')
Residential Soil 1/30/2020
Cleanup Levels
(mg/kg)
(mg/kg) Qual
SB-3 (2.5')
SB-3 (5)
Collection Date
1/30/2020
1/30/2020
Method
Parameter
CAS #
(mg/kg)
Qual
(mg/kg)
Qual
Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs)
8260B
N-Butylbenzene
104-51-8
4.3
626 NA
0.0332
BDL
8260B
Sec-Butylbenzene
135-98-8
3.3
626 NA
0.014
BDL
8260B
Ethylbenzene
100-41-4
4.9
1,560 NA
0.0193
BDL
8260B
Isopropylbenzene
98-82-8
1.7
1,564 NA
0.00681
BDL
8260B
P-Isopropyltoluene
99-87-6
0.12
100 NA
0.00701
BDL
8260B
Naphthalene
91-20-3
0.16
313 NA
0.0237
0.0013
J
8260B
N-Propylbenzene
103-65-1
1.7
626 NA
0.0184
BDL
8260B
Tetrachloroethene
127-18-4
0.0074
1.10 NA
2.85
D
BDL
8260B
Toluene
108-88-3
4.3
1,200 NA
0.0256
BDL
8260B
1,2,4-Trimelhylbenzene
95-63-6
8.5
782 NA
0.392
D
BDL
8260B
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene
108-67-8
8.3
782 NA
0.324
D
BDL
8260B
Xylenes, Total
1330-20-7
4.6
3,129 NA
0.234
BDL
8260R
Remaining Targeted VOCs
-
- NA
BDL
BDL
Semi -Volatile Organic Compounds (SV
8270D
Pyrene 1 129-00-0
270
469 NA
0.251
J
BDL
8270D
Remaining Targeted SVOCs
-
- NA
BDL
BDL
MADEP VPH/EPH
VPH
C5-C8 Aliphatics
--
68
939 NA
BDL
BDL
VPH/EPH
C9-C18 Aliphatics
---
540
1500
NA
279
D
BDL
EPH
C19-C36 Aliphatics
---
NL
31000
NA
2160
D
BDL
VPH/EPH
C9-C22 Aromatics
---
31
469
NA
443.1
BDL
6010C
Chromium
7440-47-3
5.4
47 3.21
7.04
3.62
6010C
Lead
7439-97-6
270
400 1.58
1 J
1 4.79
2.07
J
Notes
Value = Reportable concentration detectec
a ue = Reportable Concentration was detected above Soil -to -Water Maximum Contaminant Concentration
Value = Reportable Concentration was detected above Residential Soil Cleanup Level
Qualifiers: D = The sample(s) were diluted due to targets detected over the highest point of the calibration curve, or due to matrix interference. Dilution factors are included in
the final results. The result is from a diluted sample.
J = The target analyte was positively identified below the quantitation limit and above the detection limit.
NA Not Analyzed
NL Not Listed
mg/kg Milligrams per Kilogram
BDL Below Laboratory Detection Limits
Page 2 of 3

Table 2
Summary of Groundwater Analytical Results (VOCs, SVOCs, EPH/VPH, & Metals)
Carter Property
520 Judson Church Road
Fayetteville, Cumberland County, North Carolina
WR Project # 03200022.01
Sample ID
TW-1
TW-2
MW-1
Analytical Method
Compound Name
CAS #
Date Collected
1/30/2020
1/30/2020
7/9/2020
NC 2L u /L
GCL u /L
Result (u /L)
Qualifier
Result (u /L)
Qualifier
Result (u /L)
I Qualifier
Chloroform
67-66-3
70
70000
NA
NA
1.36
Bromomethane
74-83-9
100
100000
NA
1.94
BDL
8260D - Volatile Organic
Compounds (VOCs)
Methylene Chloride
75-09-2
5
5000
NA
176
D
BDL
Tetrachloroethene
127-18-4
0.7
700
NA
21.7
2.9
Remaining Targeted VOCs
NA
BDL
BDL
8270E - Semi-VOCs
All Targeted SVOCs
NA
BDL
BDL
(SVOCs)
C5-C8 Aliphatics
---
400
NL
NA
BDL
BDL
MADEP -
C9-C18 Aliphatics
---
700
NL
NA
BDL
BDL
EPH/VPH
C19-C36 Aliphatics
---
10000
NL
NA
BDL
BDL
C9-C22 Aromatics
---
200
NL
NA
BDL
BDL
Barium
7440-39-3
700
700000
N/A
N/A
29.5
6010C - Metals
Chromium
7440-47-3
10
10000
14.2
9.3
0.567
Lead
7439-97-6
15
15000
7.4
2.75
0.194
Notes:
1)
All results provided in ug/L (micrograms per liter) or parts per billion
2)
BDL = Below Detection Limits
3)
NC 2L - North Carolina Groundwater Quality Standard as per NC Administrative Code 15A NCAC 02L
4)
GCLs - NCDEQ UST Section Gross Contamination Levels for Groundwater
5)
Chemical Abstract Service (CAS) Registry Numbers shown for compounds targeted by analyses
6)
NA = Not Analyzed
7)
NL = No Listed Regulatory Standard for the Compound Shown
Qualifiers:
D = The sample(s) were diluted due to targets detected over the highest point of the calibration curve, or due to matrix interference. Dilution
factors are included
in the final results. The result is from a diluted sample.
Result
= Result Exceeds Laboratory Detection Limits
Result
= Result Exceeds 2L Standard (See Note 3, above)
Result
= Result Exceeds GCLs (See Note 4, above)

APPENDIX A
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORTS

O
"- O
ai v a
Q
O
2 i u
<
'.
co UJ rn
C V Q 6
z
N
Z
O
O 00
N
aj
= O w
w 0-
a
m z
J
QommQ
L
K 'O `� V
1"/
�\�y
m N?$
U
J L O
£ j
�v m v' C7 H
0 J
W J
> u
++
O
J
j w u u
Y � Y
f m m V1 C
Z
rn Qc_
m o i
c
Ln C
W m Q (n Y m
`
`O
1
CC
C
CC
C
W
v
{J M
ai
i
Y
V
o
L
0
O
a
W
Z Q
E
J11
Q
H
Z
©
1
Q
LL
W
uj
25
v
> 0
f6
�
_
� .
v
u
u
7iLU
uj
v)
D
EL- V
a)
L.
C
go-
fA
=
Q
j
v
W
v
3
(^�
e
V,00
_
f
tz
a
a
S
H
N
N
W
w
cr
�
C
cy.
s
Ln
CT
C
O
y�
Q
V
O
uj
v
41
_
v
O
z
lucu
t�
CW
f�6
f
cG
ai
w
U
U
Q
U
d
a
U
to
V
l7

APPENDIX B
DISPOSAL MANIFESTS

OAK HILL FARMS
LOAD #
9018 Rays Landing Road,
P.O. Box 220
TRUCK #-
Autryville, NC 28318
Telephone: [phone]
Permit # SRU600039
NON -HAZARDOUS WASTE MANIFEST
CONTACT:
SAD HcA_5-
ENVR CONSULTANT:
Aozcs
PHONE:
"� I L
GENERATOR:
oa'\,"s, ��CONTACT:
PHONE:
TRANSPORTER:
, CONTACT:
L Z2 y 91 PHONE:
DESTINATION:
�r r
OAK H LL FARM CONTACT:
OAK HILL FARMS
9018 Rays Landing Road PHONE:
�fo ''-
�lu1r Mlle, NC 28318
WASTE DESCRIPTION: -i� • ''�', t �` 7r
'
WASTE ORIGINATION POINT (complete address):
v_-JGHMASTER �H'T7-TN6_ GROSS WEIGHT: -
�rd�� EXPlR S Jl1AIE38 2020 00 TARE WEIGHT:
. HE IV f J Qu.f FOD
., .
i 'VAt.lp U G 6Ame NET WEIGHT: 36
GENERATOR'S CERTIFICATION: I certify the materials described above on this manifest are not subject to federal regulations for
reporting proper disposal of HAZARDOUS WASTE. I am also aware that plastic, trash, piping, concrete,,asphalt, and rock exceeding
3" could result in a $3.00 per ton per truck surcharge.
PRINTED/TYPED NAME, TITLE: SIGNATU E: DATE JOB STARTED:
l
S r
TRUCK DRIVER'S SIGNATURE (acknowledgment of receipt of
DATE:
NOTED DISCREPANCIES:LW
INSPECTED & ACCEPTED (except as noted above:) BY: OA HILL FARMS
SIGNED BY:
DATE:
WHITE - OHF Billing to Generator • CANARY - OHF Files PINK - Transporter • GOLDENROD - Jobsite

APPENDIX C
PHOTOGRAPHIC RECORD

■■ WithersRavenel
00 Our People. Your Success.
Frame No. 1
Description
Frame No. 2
Photo of former AST showing stained soil. (from JPEG Phase I ESA).
Description: Excavation beginning adjacent to building.
Former Eastern Trucking, Fayetteville, NC WR No. 03200022.01
Photographic Record July 2020

■■ WithersRavenel
00 Our People. Your Success.
Frame No. 3
Description: Soil being loaded into truck for disposal at Oak Hill Farms.
Frame No. 4
Description: WR Geologist observing soil excavation activities.
Former Eastern Trucking, Fayetteville, NC WR No. 03200022.01
Photographic Record July 2020

::WithersRavenel
Our People. Your Success.
Frame No. 5
Description: View of excavation showing southern, and western extent.
Frame No. 6
Description: View of the southern side of excavation at building foundation.
Former Eastern Trucking, Fayetteville, NC WR No. 03200022.01
Photographic Record July 2020

■■ WithersRavenel
00 Our People. Your Success.
Frame No. 7
Description: View of excavation with backfill.
Frame No. 8
!I �IIII�III ;�
�I �.
al �
I
�LII'i it i; � jjjf f
J j
Description: Location of MW-1.
Former Eastern Trucking, Fayetteville, NC WR No. 03200022.01
Photographic Record July 2020

■■ WithersRavenel
00 Our People. Your Success.
Frame No. 9
Description: MW- prior to installation of bolt down cover.
Frame No. 10
Description: MW-1 completed photo.
Former Eastern Trucking, Fayetteville, NC WR No. 03200022.01
Photographic Record July 2020

/e1»210101N91
PHASE II ESA REPORT

�0 WithersRavenel
,. Our People. Your Success.
March 4, 2020
Naman Hotels
2200-A David McLeod Boulevard
Florence, SC 29501
ATTN: Nick Patel
RE: Phase 11 Environmental Site Assessment
Carter Property/Eastern Trucking
520 Judson Church Road
Fayetteville, Cumberland County, North Carolina
WR Project No. 03200022.00
WithersRavenel (WR) is pleased to submit this report describing the limited Phase II Environmental
Site Assessment (ESA) activities for the above -referenced property. Assessment activities were
completed to evaluate soil and groundwater conditions relative to waste stored onsite in an
aboveground storage tank (AST). This report summarizes the results of WR's field activities and
presents the findings of the assessment of existing environmental conditions at the site.
Sincerely,
WithersRavenel
jj&�� �V 90�4-
Stan H. Harts
Project Geologist - Environmental Professional
R.S. Butch Lawter, Jr., P.E.
Senior Engineer - Environmental Professional
Director of Environmental Services
115 MacKenan Drive I Cary, NC 27511
t: 919.469.3340 1 f: 919.467.6008 1 www.withersravenel.com I License No. C-0832
Asheville ICary I Greensboro I Pittsboro I Raleigh I Wilmington

WithersRavenel
4400
. Our People. Your Success.
PHASE II
ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT
Carter Property/Eastern Trucking
520 Judson Church Road
Fayetteville, Cumberland County, North Carolina
WR Project No. 03200022.00
Prepared for:
Naman Hotels
2200-A David McLeod Boulevard
Florence, SC 29501
Prepared by:
WithersRavenel
115 MacKenan Drive
Cary, North Carolina 27511
North Carolina Firm License No. C-0832
March 4, 2020

TABLE OF CONTENTS
1 Property Description..............................................................................................1
i.1 Location and Legal Description.................................................................................1
2 Field Assessment Activities..................................................................................1
2.1 Soil Borings..............................................................................................................1
2.2 Groundwater Assessment........................................................................................... 2
3 Findings.....................................................................................................................4
Recommendations................................................................................................................... 5
Figures
Figure 1 General Location Map
Figure 2 Site Map
Figure 3 Soil Results Map
Figure 4 Groundwater Results Map
Tables
Table 1A
Summary of Soil Analytical Results (TPH)
Table 1B
Summary of Soil Analytical Results (TPH)
Table 2
Summary of Groundwater Analytical Results (VOCs & SVOCs)
Appendices
Appendix A Boring Logs
Appendix B Laboratory Analytical Reports

::WithersRavenel
Our People. Your Success.
Property Description
1.1 Location and Legal Description
WR has performed a Phase II ESA for the ±2.90-acre property addressed as 520 Judson Church Road,
Fayetteville, Cumberland County, North Carolina (Figure 1). The Cumberland County GIS website provides
the following information on the subject property:
1 0455-58-0008- Misty and Terry Carter 520 Judson Church Road ±2.90
The current site layout is provided in Figure 2.
This Phase II ESA was requested by Naman Hotels, to investigate soil and groundwater conditions related
to onsite waste oil storage in an AST. This report details the assessment work performed on the subject
property to assess the area of the AST.
2 Field Assessment Activities
2.1 Soil Borings
On January 30, 2020, WR, along with drilling subcontractor Quantex Inc., advanced five soil borings across
the site utilizing a track -mounted GeoProbe® drill rig, as depicted in Figure 3. Soil borings were placed
around the waste oil AST area with the exception SB-1, which was collected on the opposite side of the
onsite building as a background sample for the targeted metal compounds.
Soil collected from each of the borings was classified and placed in individual zip -lock baggies for field
screening by a field calibrated photoionization detector (PID) for the presence of volatile organic compounds
(VOCs) typical of petroleum and solvent contamination. Readings on the PID were below 4 parts per million
(ppm) in all borings except SB-3, which is considered instrument variance. PID readings in SB-3 were around
38 ppm for the interval of two to three feet below land surface (BLS). In addition, odors were noted in SB-
3. Samples were collected from each boring to confirm the PID readings. The general lithology of the site
consisted of mostly yellow to orange clays until a depth of approximately 12 feet was reached where a
clayey sand was identified. Refer to the attached boring logs in Appendix A for soil classifications and PID
readings. Soil borings were advanced to approximately 8 feet BLS.
Soil samples were collected in pre -preserved laboratory supplied glassware specific to the analysis requested
for the samples. Following collection, all five samples were placed on ice within a cooler and ultimately
submitted under chain -of -custody protocols to REDLab in Wilmington, NC, for analysis of total petroleum
hydrocarbons (TPH) gasoline range organics (GRO) and diesel range organics (DRO) by Ultraviolet
Fluorescence (UVF) methodology. SB-1 was also submitted under chain -of -custody protocols to Xenco in
Tampa, FL for analysis of Lead & Chromium by EPA Method 6010C as a means to establish onsite natural
levels of those targeted metals. Two depths of SB-3 (2.5' and 5' BLS) were further submitted under chain -
of -custody protocols to Xenco in Tampa, FL for analysis of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) by EPA
Method 8260B, semi-VOCs (SVOCs) by EPA Method 8270D, MADEP Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons
(EPH) & Volatile Petroleum Hydrocarbons (VPH), and Lead & Chromium by EPA Method 6010C. A copy of
the chain -of -custody records are included with analytical data in Appendix B.
Carter Property/Eastern Trucking: Fayetteville, NC WR No. 03200022.00
Phase 11 Environmental Site Assessment March 2020

::WithersRavenel
Our People. Your Success.
Soil Analytical Results 0 TPH-DRO/GRO
Data for the analysis of the soil samples is as follows:
• TPH-GRO/DRO was reported below laboratory detection limits (BDL) SB-1, SB-2, and SB-5.
• TPH-GRO and TPH-DRO were reported at concentrations above laboratory detection limits in SB-
3 and SB-4.
o TPH-GRO was reported at a concentration of 43.3 mg/kg in SB-3, which is below the
NCDEQ action level of 50 mg/kg for TPH-GRO.
o TPH-GRO was reported at a concentration of 41.9 mg/kg in SB-4, which is below the
NCDEQ action level of 50 mg/kg for TPH-GRO.
o TPH-DRO was reported at a concentration of 502.4 mg/kg in SB-3, which is above the
NCDEQ action level of 100 mg/kg for TPH-DRO.
o TPH-DRO was reported at a concentration of 526.9 mg/kg in SB-4, which is above the
NCDEQ action level of 100 mg/kg for TPH-DRO.
Table 1A and Figure 3 present the laboratory analytical results for the collected soil samples. The laboratory
analytical report is included in the Appendix.
Soil Analytical Results 0 VOCs, SVOCs, EPH/VPH, & Metals
Data for the analysis of the groundwater samples is as follows:
Analytical data for the metals background soil sample SB-1 (25) indicated the presence of targeted
metal compounds above laboratory detection limits, but below applicable NCDEQ soil standards.
o Chromium was reported at a concentration of 3.21 mg/kg, which is below its soil -to -water
maximum soil contaminant concentration (MSCC) of 5.4 mg/kg.
o Lead was reported at a concentration of 1.58 mg/kg, which is well below its soil -to -water
MSCC of 270 mg/kg.
• Analytical data for soil sample SB-3 (25) indicated the presence of numerous targeted compounds
above laboratory detection limits.
o Tetrachloroethene (TCE) was reported at a concentration of 2.85 mg/kg, which is above its
residential MSCC of 1.10 mg/kg.
o C9-C22 Aromatics was reported at a concentration of 443.1 mg/kg, which is above its soil -
to -water MSCC of 31 mg/kg.
o Chromium was reported at a concentration of 7.04 mg/kg, which is above its soil -to -water
MSCC of 5.4 mg/kg.
• Analytical data for soil sample SB-3 (5') indicated no targeted compounds above laboratory
detection limits.
Table 1B and Figure 3 present the laboratory analytical results for the collected soil samples. The laboratory
analytical report is included in the Appendix.
2.2 Groundwater Assessment
Groundwater assessment activities were completed with a track -mounted GeoProbe® drill rig using direct
push methods to extend SB-1 and SB-3 into the surficial aquifer beneath the site. The borings were
converted to temporary monitoring wells TW-1 and TW-2, respectively. The location of SB-1 was chosen
Carter Property/Eastern Trucking: Fayetteville, NC WR No. 03200022.00
Phase II Environmental Site Assessment March 2020
2

::WithersRavenel
Our People. Your Success.
as a background sample for the targeted metal compounds and the location of TW-2 in SB-3 was chosen
based on the PID readings of the screened soils.
The temporary wells were constructed with 1" diameter PVC screen section extending from the base of the
boring and connected to 1" diameter PVC risers extending to surface grade. The temporary wells were
installed at the locations depicted in Figure 4 and constructed as shown in the well construction logs in
Appendix A.
Prior to purging and sampling each well, the depth to groundwater within the temporary wells was gauged
utilizing an electronic water level indicator. The water levels measured approximately 8 feet below the
ground surface in both wells. No determination of groundwater flow was made based on well gauging. Each
temporary well was purged of three well volumes utilizing a peristaltic pump employing virgin disposable
polyethylene (PE) tubing. Groundwater samples were then collected in pre -preserved laboratory supplied
glassware specific to the analysis requested for the samples. Following collection, both groundwater
samples were placed on ice within a cooler and ultimately submitted under chain -of -custody protocols to
Xenco Laboratories in Tampa, FL, for analysis of Lead & Chromium by EPA Method 6010C. The sample
collected from TW-2 was also analyzed for VOCs by EPA Method 8260B, SVOCs by EPA method 8270D,
and MADEP EPH/VPH. A copy of the chain -of -custody record is included with analytical data in Appendix
B.
After completion of groundwater sampling, each temporary well was abandoned through the removal of
well materials and filling of the borehole with bentonite to surface grad.
Groundwater Analytical Results 0 VOCs, SVOCs, EPH/VPH, & Metals
Data for the analysis of the groundwater samples is as follows:
• Analytical data for the metals background groundwater sample TW-1 indicated the presence of
targeted metal compounds above laboratory detection limits.
o Chromium was reported at a concentration of 14.2 µg/L, which is above its NCAC 2L
standard of 10 µg/L.
o Lead was reported at a concentration of 7.4 µg/L, which is below its NCAC 2L standard of
15 µg/L.
Analytical data for groundwater sample TW-2 indicated the presence of targeted VOCs and metals
above laboratory detection limits. All targeted SVOCs and EPH/VPH compounds were BDL for the
sample collected from TW-2.
o Bromomethane was reported at a concentration of 1.94 µg/L, which is well below its NCAC
2L standard of 100 µg/L.
o Methylene Chloride was reported at a concentration of 176 µg/L, which is above its NCAC
2L standard of 5 µg/L.
o Tetrachloroethene (TCE) was reported at a concentration of 21.7 µg/L, which is above its
NCAC 2L standard of 0.7 µg/L.
o Chromium was reported at a concentration of 9.3 µg/L, which is below its NCAC 2L
standard of 10 µg/L.
o Lead was reported at a concentration of 2.75 µg/L, which is below its NCAC 2L standard
of 15 µg/L.
No reported concentrations of targeted VOCs, SVOCs, EPH/VPH ranges, or metal compounds
indicated concentrations above their respective Gross Contaminant Levels (GCLs) in either
submitted groundwater sample.
Carter Property/Eastern Trucking: Fayetteville, NC WR No. 03200022.00
Phase II Environmental Site Assessment March 2020
3

::WithersRavenel
Our People. Your Success.
Data for the analysis of the groundwater sample is included in Table 2 and shown on Figure 4. A copy of
the chain -of -custody record is included with analytical data in Appendix B.
3 Findings
At the request of Naman Hotels, WR performed a Phase II ESA for the ±2.90-acre property addressed as
520 Judson Church Road, Fayetteville, Cumberland County, North Carolina. This investigation was initiated
to evaluate soil and groundwater conditions relative to waste stored onsite in an aboveground storage tank
(AST).
Findings of the Phase II assessment activities conducted at the site by WR in January 2020 included the
following:
• Data for the analysis of the soil samples did not indicate the presence of TPH-GRO above respective
NCDEQ TPH-GRO action levels.
• Data for the analysis of the soil samples indicated the presence of TPH-DRO above respective NCDEQ
TPH-DRO action levels in SB-3 and SB-4.
o TPH-DRO was reported at a concentration of 502.4 mg/kg in SB-3, which is above the
NCDEQ action level of 100 mg/kg for TPH-DRO.
o TPH-DRO was reported at a concentration of 526.9 mg/kg in SB-4, which is above the
NCDEQ action level of 100 mg/kg for TPH-DRO.
• Data for the analysis of the soil samples indicated the presence of one targeted VOC above applicable
NCDEQ soil standards.
o Tetrachloroethene (TCE) was reported at a concentration of 2.85 mg/kg in SB-3 (25),
which is above its residential MSCC of 1.10 mg/kg.
• Data for the analysis of the soil samples did not indicate the presence of SVOCs above respective
NCDEQ soil standards.
• Data for the analysis of the soil samples indicated the presence of one targeted EPH/VPH range above
applicable NCDEQ soil standards.
o C9-C22 Aromatics was reported at a concentration of 443.1 mg/kg in SB-3 (25), which is
above its soil -to -water MSCC of 31 mg/kg.
Data for the analysis of the soil samples indicated the presence of one targeted metal above applicable
NCDEQ soil standards.
o Chromium was reported at a concentration of 7.04 mg/kg in SB-3 (25), which is above its
soil -to -water MSCC of 5.4 mg/kg.
• Data for the analysis of the groundwater samples indicated the presence of two targeted VOCs above
applicable NCDEQ groundwater standards.
o Methylene Chloride was reported at a concentration of 176 µg/L in TW-2, which is above
its NCAC 2L standard of 5 µg/L.
Carter Property/Eastern Trucking: Fayetteville, NC WR No. 03200022.00
Phase II Environmental Site Assessment March 2020
4

::WithersRavenel
Our People. Your Success.
Tetrachloroethene (TCE) was reported at a concentration of 21.7 µg/L in TW-2, which is
above its NCAC 2L standard of 0.7 µg/L.
• Data for the analysis of the groundwater samples indicated no targeted SVOCs or EPH/VPH compounds
applicable NCDEQ groundwater standards.
Data for the analysis of the groundwater samples indicated the presence of one targeted metal
compound above applicable NCDEQ groundwater standards.
o Chromium was reported at a concentration of 14.2 µg/L in TW-1, which is above its NCAC
2L standard of 10 µg/L.
• No reported concentrations of targeted VOCs, SVOCs, EPH/VPH ranges, or metal compounds indicated
concentrations above their respective Gross Contaminant Levels (GCLs) in either submitted
groundwater sample.
Recommendations
This assessment identified the presence of soil and groundwater contamination above applicable regulatory
standards in the vicinity of the waste oil AST. WR recommends that limited soil remediation be conducted
in this area to minimize future impacts to groundwater. It is anticipated that given the shallow depth to
groundwater, the volume of soil needed to be removed may be limited to under 20 cubic yards. WR also
recommends the installation of a permanent monitoring well in this area and a subsequent groundwater
monitoring event to confirm the findings of these Phase II ESA. Once the contaminated soil has been
removed, it may be possible to close the incident with a Notice of Residual Petroleum (NORP) by filing a
deed restriction for the use of groundwater on the subject site. It would be our pleasure to assist you with
these recommendations.
WR is pleased to submit this report describing the limited Phase II ESA activities for the site. This report has
summarized the results of WR's field activities and presents the findings of the assessment of existing
environmental conditions at the site.
If you have any questions, please contact us at 910.899.4619.
Sincerely,
WithersRavenel
J&�Z' �V 9,�A-
Stan H. Harts, LG, CSP
Project Geologist II
Environmental Professional
R. S. (Butch) Lawter, Jr., P.E.
Senior Engineer - Environmental Prof.
Director of Environmental Services
SEAL
`- 1688 s
"'GFOZpGt`'�•� •.
Carter Property/Eastern Trucking: Fayetteville, NC
Phase II Environmental Site Assessment
WR No. 03200022.00
March 2020
5

FIGURES

RD
r
- •LI
53
Ii o
SL"yNYSIDE CHURCH
_RD
0
SUBJECT SITE
±2.90 ACRES
�. Judson
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 500 1000 2000
I
1 inch = 1000 ft.
CARTER PROPERTY DRAWN BY SCALE: FIGURE NO.
W i t h e rs Ra ve n e l
1/ 520JUDSONCHURCHROAD AP 1"=1000' 1
ineers Engors FAYETTEVILLE, CUMBERLAND COUNTY, NC
b I Planners I Surveyors APPROVED BY: DATE: PROJECT NO.:
115 MacKenan Drive I Cary, NC 275111 t: 9.3340 license #: C-0832
www.w i t h e rs ra v e n e I. c GENERAL LOCATION MAP SH 02/17/2020 03200022.00
w. nel.co o m
Yk\MM-0070\700077-14w M HMMs SW Naomi\EM%e\Ph ! P\CAW4Wft0- PMMrM7 17, 70I0 - P01E. N141N

KINGDOM HALL OF
JEHOVAH'S WITNESSES
UNDEVELOPED WOODLANDS
JUDSON
BAPTIST
CHURCH
RESIDENTIAL
RESIDENTIAL
RESIDENTIAL
SUBJECT SITE
±2.90 ACRES
WASTE OIL AST
R UNDEVELOPED WOODLANDS
c
r 4rR'Aq/RF9
Qz/
oil
TRU BY HILTON HOTEL # f
01
% UNDEVELOPED WOODLANDS
f; HAMPTON INN & SUITES
yr GRAPHIC SCALE
r# , 0 75 150 30
DAYS INN BY WYNDHAM
1 inch = 150 ft.
DRAWN BY: SCALE: FIGURE NO.:
WithersRavenel CARTER PROPERTY AP 1°=150' 2
I / Engineers I Planners I Surveyors 520 JUDSON CHURCH ROAD SITE MAP
FAYETTEVILLE, CUMBERLAND COUNTY, NC APPROVED BY Dare PROJECT :
115 MacKenan Drive I Cary, NC 275111 t: 919.469.3340I license $: C-0832I SH O2/17/2020 03200022.00
w.withersravenel.com
*\.V\20-0020\2O0O22-4w— Fm" Sd bfewi I\Em+o\MwM N\CA0\Fmwmd"- Febww 17. iOiO - POIE, WSTN

Client sample ID SS-1 (2.6') SB-3 (2.5') SB-3 (5') N
Soil -to -Water
N
Collection Date Maximum Residential Soil V3012020 1/30/2020 M012020 °z M G o R
Contaminant Cleanup Levels w N R
Concentration (mglkg) p -
Method Parameter CAS # (mglkg) (mglkg) Qua[ (mg/kg) Qual (mglkg) Quaff a
0
N
Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCsj N N
82606 N-Bulyroenzene I04-51-a 4-3 626 NA 0,0332 BDL SB-5 w 11 F r, j
\
82606 Sec-BL4yIbeflZene 135-88$ 3-3 626 -09 NA 0.014 BDL • o No
8260B Ethylberuxne 1vQ-41� A-9 1,560 NA 0.0195 BDL SB-4
82608 Isopropybenzene 9"2-8 1-7 1,564 NA 0.00881 B❑L • SB-3
82608 P-Isopropyltokwne 99-87-6 0.12 100 NA 0.00701 B❑L Q o Ln
82608 Naphthalene 91-20-3 0.16 313 NA 0,0237 0.0013 J • SB 2
8260B N-Prop71benzene 103-65-1 1.7 5245 NA 0,0184 B❑L
82608 Tetrachbroethene 127-18-4 0.0074 1A0 NA 2,84 ❑ BDL
82608 Toluene 108-13" 4.3 1.200 NA 0.0258 BDL
82608 1,2,4-Trimethybenzene SM3-6 8.5 782 NA 0.392 ❑ B❑L
82608 1,3,5-Thrrethybenzene 108.67.8 8.3 782 NA 0.324 ❑ 3DL E
82606 xylenes, Tamil 1330-20.7 4.8 3,129 W1 0.234 BOIL �• C
826M Remaining Targeted VOCs - - NA 3DL 3DL - L
is COMPOU TRH
8270D Pyrene 129-00-0 270 469 W1 0,251 J BDL c,,o J
8270D Rema�nrng 7argelea SVOC$ - - NA BDL BDL ��R rq 1LI
JEL
'•: PH C5•C3 Ahphebcs ... 68 939 _ NA 90L B❑L -j_
vPH1EPH C9-C18AiphaScs ... 540 15oo M NA 270 0 BOIL 0
EPH C19-C36 AllphatIcs --• NL 310W = NA 2160 ❑ BDL N
VPHIEPH C9-C22Aronvics ... 31 469 NA 443.1 BDL
6010C Chromium 1 744o-47-3 1L SA 47 3,21 7.04 3,62
6010C Lead 7439-97-6 1.58 J 4.79 2.07 J
Notes tJ
z
Value = Reportable concentration detected F
Value = Reportable Concentration was detected above Soil -to -Water Maximum Contaminant Concentrations . p Z
Value = Reportable Concentration was detected above Residential Soil Cleanup Levels Q O
W �u
Qualifiers. 0
D = The sample(s) were diluted due to targets detected over the highest point of the calibration curve, or due to matrix interference. Dilution factors are d C=J z
included in the final results- The restit is from a diluted sample- 0
J = The target analyte was positively identified below the quantitation limit and above the detection limit. Ice
U m
MA Not Analyzed � 0LLI 0 u
NL Not Listed L
rrglkg Milligrams per Kilogram J
BDL Below Laboratory Detection Limits to o
• U N r
SOIL SAMPLE DATE SAMPLE DEPTH TPHIGRO TPHIDRO LU
}
ID (feet BLS). (rn ,kg) (mg/kg) <
SB-1 1/30/2020 3 BDL BDL
SB-2 1/30/2020 3 BDL BDL
SB-3 1/30/2020 3 43.3 502.4
SB-4 1/30/2020 3 41.9 526.9 SB-1 C �, M
v
SB-5 1/30/2020 3 BDL BDL E
\ o
NCDEQ Action. Levels ro
v
ro �� ro N •—
Notes: 1 - NIA = Not Applicable or Sampled - L z 3
2 - Results in bald exceed laboratory detection limits. 2
3 - Results shaded bald exceed the NCDEQ action level. N N
4 - BLS = Below Land Surface.4W
04
b�11 66
LEGEND 5 - Results are in mg/kg (milligrams per kilogram). w
6 - Soil samples were collected January 30, 2020. 3 Y c
•7-TPH Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons 0 GRAPHIC SCALE v
SOIL BORING LOCATION 10 20 40
8 -BDL =Below Detection Limits `^
ti
ti
NOTES: 9 - GRO - Gasoline Range Organic ,.
1.) LOCATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE AND NOT EXACT. 10 - ORO - Diesel Range Organics
1 inch = 20 ft.

o
\ � N g
N
w O t p O �
z r O R
w Y.
� 0 co
N w
o
O
N N
I I n
a- H
N o N
TW-2 0
m L
qST 10
3 a 'o L
��
o Q R
a
Vf
J
Vf
TR�C
kRFAg14 W
ry
G
C7
U
Z
Z
a'
W �p
0
O J
�Uaim
CC o D
LU U
°w
w/ J
a�W
WIT Ur-
w
a
N
TW-1 C j
YY} W> M
P E
\ O
/
ro — C
� `/ P N
Ilir C .-y �
�/� C n L
\/ I
L EL z 3
N U N
L� >o
bA pU
LEGEND
LI c xt
A GRAPHIC SCALE Y
TEMPORARY MONITORING WELL LOCATION 0 10 20 40 2
`` ti
NOTES: ,,
1.) LOCATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE AND NOT EXACT.
1 inch = 20 ft.
Sample ID
TW-1
TV11-2
Analytical Method
Compound Name
CAS #
Date Collected
1/30/2020
113a12D2D
NC 2L [uglL}
GCL �uglL}
Result �uglL}
Qualifier
Result �uglL}
Qualifier
Brolriomethane
74-83-9
100
100000
NA
1.94
8260D -Volatile
Methylene Chloride
75

TABLES

Table 113
Summary of Soil Analytical Results (VOCs, SVOCs, EPH/VPH, & Metals)
Carter Property
520 Judson Church Road
Fayetteville, Cumberland County, North Carolina
WR Proiect # 03200022.00
Client Sample ID
Soil -to -Water
Maximum
Contaminant
Concentration
(mg/kg)
Residential Soil
Cleanup Levels
(mg/kg)
SIB-1 (2.5')
SIB-3 (2.5')
SIB-3 (5)
Collection Date
1/30/2020
1/30/2020
1/30/2020
Method
Parameter
CAS #
(mg/kg)
Qual
(mg/kg)
Qual
(mg/kg)
Qual
Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCS)
8260E
N-Butylbenzene
104-51-8
4.3
626
NA
0.0332
BDL
8260E
Sec-Butylbenzene
135-98-8
3.3
626
NA
0.014
BDL
8260E
Ethylbenzene
100-41-4
4.9
1,560
NA
0.0193
BDL
8260B
Isopropylbenzene
98-82-8
1.7
1,564
NA
0.00681
BDL
8260E
P-Isopropyltoluene
99-87-6
0.12
100
NA
0.00701
BDL
8260B
Naphthalene
91-20-3
0.16
313
NA
0.0237
0.0013
J
8260E
N-Propylbenzene
103-65-1
1.7
626
NA
0.0184
BDL
8260B
Tetrachloroethene
127-184
0.0074
1.10
NA
2.85
D
BDL
8260E
Toluene
108-88-3
4.3
1,200
NA
0.0256
BDL
8260B
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene
95-63-6
8.5
782
NA
0.392
D
BDL
8260E
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene
108-67-8
18.3
782
NA
0.324
D
BDL
8260B
Xylenes, Total
1330-20-7
4.6
3,129
NA
0.234
BDL
8260E
Remaining Targeted VOCs
-
-
NA
BDL
BDL
Semi -Volatile Organic Compounds (SVOCs)
8270D
Py-r, 129-00-0
0
469
NA
0.251
J
BDL
8270D
Remaining Targeted SVOCs
ADEP VPH/EPH
- -
NA
BDL
BDL
VPH
C5-C8 Aliphatics -
68
939
NA
BDL
BDL
VPH/EPH
C9-C18 Aliphatics -
540
1500
NA
279
D
BDL
EPH
C19-C36AIiphalics -
NIL
31000
NA
2160
D
BDL
VPH/EPH
C9-C22 Aromatics -
31
469
NA
443.1
BDL
Metals
6010C
Chromium 7440-47-3
5.4
47
3.21
7.04
3.62
6010C
Lead 7439-97-6
270
M
1.58
J
4.79
2.07
J
Notes
Value = Reportable concentration detected
Value = Reportable Concentration was detected above Soil -to -Water Maximum Contaminant Concentrations
Value = Reportable Concentration was detected above Residential Soil Cleanup Levels
Qualifiers: D = The sample(s) were diluted due to targets detected over the highest point of the calibration curve, or due to matrix interference. Dilution factors are
included in the final results. The result is from a diluted sample.
J = The target analyte was positively identified below the quantitation limit and above the detection limit.
NA Not Analyzed
NL Not Listed
mg/kg Milligrams per Kilogram
BDL Below Laboratory Detection Limits
Page 1 of 1

Table 1A
Summary of Soil Analytical Results (TPH)
Carter Property
520 Judson Church Road
Fayetteville, Cumberland County, North Carolina
WR Project # 03200022.00
SAMPLE DEPTH
TPH/GRO
TPH/DRO
SOIL SAMPLE ID
DATE
(feet BLS)
(mg/kg)
(mg/kg)
S13-1
1/30/2020
3
BDL
BDL
SB-2
1/30/2020
3
BDL
BDL
S13-3
1/30/2020
3
43.3
502.4
SB-4
1/30/2020
3
41.9
526.9
S13-5
1/30/2020
3
BDL
BDL
NCDEQ Action Levels
50
100
Notes:
1 - N/A = Not Applicable or Sampled
2 - Results in bold exceed laboratory detection limits.
3 - Results shaded bold exceed the NCDEQ action level.
4 - BLS = Below Land Surface.
5 - Results are in mg/kg (milligrams per kilogram).
6 - Soil samples were collected January 30, 2020.
7 - TPH = Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons
8 - BDL = Below Detection Limits
9 - GRO = Gasoline Range Organics
10 - DRO = Diesel Range Organics

Table 2
Summary of Groundwater Analytical Results (VOCs, SVOCs, EPH/VPH,
& Metals)
Carter Property
520 Judson Church Road
Fayetteville, Cumberland County, North Carolina
WR Project # 03200022.00
Sample ID
TW-1
TW-2
Analytical Method
Compound Name
CAS #
Date Collected
1/30/2020
1/30/2020
NC 2L (ug/L)
GCL (ug/L)
Result (u /L)
Qualifier
Result (u /L)
Qualifier
Bromomethane
74-83-9
100
100000
NA
1.94
Methylene Chloride
75-09-2
5
5000
NA
176
D
8260D - Volatile Organic
Compounds (VOCs)
Tetrachloroethene
127-18-4
0.7
700
NA
21.7
Remaining Targeted VOCs
NA
BDL
8270E - Semi-VOCs
(SVOCs)
All Targeted SVOCs
NA
BDL
C5-C8 Aliphatics
---
400
NL
NA
BDL
MADEP -
C9-C18 Aliphatics
---
700
NL
NA
BDL
EPH/VPH
C19-C36 Aliphatics
---
10000
NL
NA
BDL
C9-C22 Aromatics
---
200
NL
NA
BDL
Chromium
1 7440-47-3
1 10
1 10000
14.2
9.3
6010C - Metals
Lead
7439-97-6
15
15000
7.4
2.75
Notes:
1) All results provided in ug/L (micrograms per liter) or parts per billion
2) BDL = Below Detection Limits
3) NC 2L - North Carolina Groundwater Quality Standard as per NC Administrative Code 15A NCAC 02L
4) GCLs - NCDEQ UST Section Gross Contamination Levels for Groundwater
5) Chemical Abstract Service (CAS) Registry Numbers shown for compounds targeted by analyses
6) NA = Not Analyzed
7) NL = No Listed Regulatory Standard for the Compound Shown
Qualifiers:
D = The sample(s) were diluted due to targets detected over the highest point of
the calibration curve, or due to matrix
interference. Dilution factors are included in the final results. The result is from a diluted sample.
Result
= Result Exceeds Laboratory Detection Limits
Result
= Result Exceeds 2L Standard (See Note 3, above)
Result
= Result Exceeds GCLs (See Note 4, above)

APPENDIX A
Soil Boring Logs/Well Construction Logs

NO WithersRavenel
Engineers I Planners I Surveyors
SOIL BORING LOG
Boring # SB-1/TW-1 Job Name Carter Property/Eastern Trucking Job # 3200020.00
Date 01/30/2020 Site Loc. Fayetteville, NC Gnd EL NA
WR Rep Stan H. Harts Driller Quantex GW EL NA
Northing NA
Easting NA
Depth in Feet
From To
Soil Description
(Field USCS Classification)
Sample Interval
(feet BLS)
Total VOCs (ppm)
PID
FID
0
Yellow to orange sandy clay
5
2
3
0
6
7
0
8
12
Tan to orange, clayey medium to course sand, moist
Boring Terminated at 12'
Saturated @ 9 feet BLS
NR=No Reading
NA=Not Applicable
BLS=Below Land Surface
TOC=Top of Casing
PID=Photoionization Detector
EI=Elevation
ppm=parts per million
GW=Ground Water
USCS=Unified Soil Classification System
VOCs=Volatile Organic Compounds
FID=Flame Ionization Detector
Page 1 of 1
115 MocKenon Drive, Cary, North Carolina 27511 tei:919.469.3340 fox:919.467.6008 www.withersrovenel.com

NO WithersRavenel
Engineers I Planners I Surveyors
SOIL BORING LOG
Boring # SB-2 Job Name Carter Property/Eastern Trucking Job # 3200020.00
Date 01/30/2020 Site Loc. Fayetteville, NC Gnd EL NA
WR Rep Stan H. Harts Driller Quantex GW EL NA
Northing NA
Easting NA
Depth in Feet
From To
Soil Description
(Field USCS Classification)
Sample Interval
(feet BLS)
Total VOCs (ppm)
PID
FID
0
Yellow to organge sandy clay
5
2
3
0.1
6
7
0.1
8
12
Tan to orange, clayey medium to course sand
Boring Terminated at 12'
Saturated @ 9 feet BLS
NR=No Reading
NA=Not Applicable
BLS=Below Land Surface
TOC=Top of Casing
PID=Photoionization Detector
EI=Elevation
ppm=parts per million
GW=Ground Water
USCS=Unified Soil Classification System
VOCs=Volatile Organic Compounds
FID=Flame Ionization Detector
Page 1 of 1
115 MocKenon Drive, Cary, North Carolina 27511 tei:919.469.3340 fox:919.467.6008 www.withersrovenel.com

NO WithersRavenel
Engineers I Planners I Surveyors
SOIL BORING LOG
Boring # SB-3/TW-2 Job Name Carter Property/Eastern Trucking Job # 3200020.00
Date 01/30/2020 Site Loc. Fayetteville, NC Gnd EL NA
WR Rep Stan H. Harts Driller Quantex GW EL NA
Northing NA
Easting NA
Depth in Feet
From To
Soil Description
(Field USCS Classification)
Sample Interval
(feet BLS)
Total VOCs (ppm)
PID
FID
0
Orange to yellow sandy clay with strong oil odor
4
2
3
38
4
8
Orange clay with minor sands no odor
6
7
0.2
8
12
Tan to orange, clayey medium to course, moist sand
Boring Terminated at 12'
Saturated @ 9 feet BLS
NR=No Reading
NA=Not Applicable
BLS=Below Land Surface
TOC=Top of Casing
PID=Photoionization Detector
EI=Elevation
ppm=parts per million
GW=Ground Water
USCS=Unified Soil Classification System
VOCs=Volatile Organic Compounds
FID=Flame Ionization Detector
Page 1 of 1
115 MocKenon Drive, Cary, North Carolina 27511 tei:919.469.3340 fox:919.467.6008 www.withersrovenel.com

NO WithersRavenel
Engineers I Planners I Surveyors
SOIL BORING LOG
Boring # SB-4 Job Name Carter Property/Eastern Trucking Job # 3200020.00
Date 01/30/2020 Site Loc. Fayetteville, NC Gnd EL NA
WR Rep Stan H. Harts Driller Quantex GW EL NA
Northing NA
Easting NA
Depth in Feet
From To
Soil Description
(Field USCS Classification)
Sample Interval
(feet BLS)
Total VOCs (ppm)
PID
FID
0
Yellow to orange sandy clay slight oil odor
Yellow to orange sandy clay
3
2
3
6
3
8
6
7
0.4
8
12
Tan to orange, clayey medium to course sand
Boring Terminated at 12'
Saturated @ 9 feet BLS
NR=No Reading
NA=Not Applicable
BLS=Below Land Surface
TOC=Top of Casing
PID=Photoionization Detector
EI=Elevation
ppm=parts per million
GW=Ground Water
USCS=Unified Soil Classification System
VOCs=Volatile Organic Compounds
FID=Flame Ionization Detector
Page 1 of 1
115 MocKenon Drive, Cary, North Carolina 27511 tei:919.469.3340 fox:919.467.6008 www.withersrovenel.com

NO WithersRavenel
Engineers I Planners I Surveyors
SOIL BORING LOG
Boring # SB-5 Job Name Carter Property/Eastern Trucking Job # 3200020.00
Date 01/30/2020 Site Loc. Fayetteville, NC Gnd EL NA
WR Rep Stan H. Harts Driller Quantex GW EL NA
Northing NA
Easting NA
Depth in Feet
From To
Soil Description
(Field USCS Classification)
Sample Interval
(feet BLS)
Total VOCs (ppm)
PID
FID
0
Orange to yellow sandy clay
5
2
3
0.2
6
7
0
8
12
Tan to yellow medium to coarse moist sand
Boring Terminated at 12'
Saturated @ 9 feet BLS
NR=No Reading
NA=Not Applicable
BLS=Below Land Surface
TOC=Top of Casing
PID=Photoionization Detector
EI=Elevation
ppm=parts per million
GW=Ground Water
USCS=Unified Soil Classification System
VOCs=Volatile Organic Compounds
FID=Flame Ionization Detector
Page 1 of 1
115 MocKenon Drive, Cary, North Carolina 27511 tei:919.469.3340 fox:919.467.6008 www.withersrovenel.com

NO WithersRavenel
,. Our People. Your Success.
WELL CONSTRUCTION LOG
Well ID: TW-1 Job Name: Carter Property/Eastern Trucking Job #: 3200020.00
Date: January 30, 2020 Site Loc.: Fayetteville, NC TOC EL: NA
WR Rep: Stan Harts Driller: Quantex Drilling GW EL: NA
NC NAD83 Easting: NA NC NAD83 Northing: NA
Depth in
Feet
Soil Description
(Field USCS Classification)
Well Construction
0
Ground Surface
Ground Surface
1
Yellow to orange sandy clay
0' to 8
Natural Sand Pack 2'-12'
0'-2' 1" PVC Riser
2'-12' 1" PVC #10
Slotted Screen
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Tan to orange,clayey medium to
course, moist sand
8'- 12 ,
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Notes: TW installed after initial 10' soil boring
1.) Boring Terminated at 12' BLS = = Groundwater Level approximately 8 feet
2.) BLS - Below Land Surface
3.) TOC - Top of Casing
4.) NA - Not Applicable
Page 1 of 1
115 MacKenan Drive Cary, North Carolina 27511 to%919.469.334o fax.[phone] www.wither5ravenel.com

NO WithersRavenel
,. Our People. Your Success.
WELL CONSTRUCTION LOG
Well ID: TW-1 Job Name: Carter Property/Eastern Trucking Job #: 3200020.00
Date: January 30, 2020 Site Loc.: Fayetteville, NC TOC EL: NA
WR Rep: Stan Harts Driller: Quantex Drilling GW EL: NA
NC NAD83 Easting: NA NC NAD83 Northing: NA
Depth in
Feet
Soil Description
(Field USCS Classification)
Well Construction
0
Ground Surface
Ground Surface
1
Orange to yellow sandy clay with oil
odor in the first 4 feet
0' to 8
Natural Sand Pack 2'-12'
0'-2' 1" PVC Riser
2'-12' 1" PVC #10
Slotted Screen
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Tan to orange, clayey medium to
course moist sand
8'- 12 ,
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Notes: TW installed after initial 10' soil boring
1.) Boring Terminated at 12' BLS = = Groundwater Level approximately 8 feet
2.) BLS - Below Land Surface
3.) TOC - Top of Casing
4.) NA - Not Applicable
Page 1 of 1
115 MacKenan Drive Cary, North Carolina 27511 to%919.469.334o fax.[phone] www.wither5ravenel.com

APPENDIX B
Laboratory Analytical Reports

_
C)"
REDLAB
RAPID ENVIRONMENTAL DIAGNOSTICS
Ao
Client: Withers Ravenel
Address: 219 Station Rd
Wilmington, NC
Contact: Stan Harts
Project: #03200022
Samples taken
Samples extracted
Samples analysed
Operator
Thursday, January 30, 2020
Thursday, January 30, 2020
Monday, February 3, 2020
Caroline Stevens
U04049
Matrix
Sample ID
Dilution
used
BTEX
(C6 - C9)
GRO
(C5 - C10)
DRO
(C10 - C35)
TPH
(C5 - C35)
Total
Aromatics
(C10-C35)
16 EPA
PAHs
BaP
Ratios
HC Fingerprint Match
% light
% mid
heavy
s
SB-1
14.4
<0.36
<0.36
<0.36
<0.36
<0.07
<0.12
<0.014
0 91
9
,(FCM)
s
SB-2
21.1
<0.53
<0.53
<0.53
<0.53
<0.11
<0.17
<0.021
0
0
0
PHC not detected
s
SB-3
23.9
<0.6
43.3
502.4
545.7
61.7
6.7
<0.024
56.1
42.7
1.2
Waste Oil 75.2%,(FCM)
s
SB-4
23.2
<0.58
41.9
526.9
568.8
68
7.4
<0.023
53.5
45.2
1.3
Waste Oil 74.8%,(FCM)
s
SB-5
12.6
<0.32
<0.32
<0.32
<0.32
<0.06
<0.1
<0.0131
0
0
0
,(FCM)
I brato
ch
al KNAMMck
OK
Results generated by a QED HC-1 analyser. Concentration values in mg/kg for soil samples and mg/L for water samples. Soil values are not corrected for moisture or stone content
Fingerprints provide a tentative hydrocarbon identification. The abbreviations are:- FCM = Results calculated using Fundamental Calibration Mode : % = confidence for sample fingerprint match to library
(SBS) or (LBS) = Site Specific or Library Background Subtraction applied to result: (PFM) = Poor Fingerprint Match : (T) = Turbid : (P) = Particulate present

Project: #03200022
SB-1 : ,(FCM)
QED Hydrocarbon Fingerprints
SB-2 : PHC not detected
##################
SB-3 : Waste Oil 75.2%,(FCM)
SB-5 : ,(FCM)
0,E D
700
SB-4 : Waste Oil 74.80XJCM)
E
766
QED
48576

xEnic
LAQORATC]RD
Analytical Report 650957
for
WithersRavenel
Project Manager: Stan H. Harts
520 Judson Church Rd
03200022
02.13.2020
Pe pcc�F
A�Oki ./
Xenco Laboratories
1412 Tech Blvd.
Tampa, FL 33619
Ph:[phone] Fax:[phone]
Xenco-Houston (EPA Lab Code: TX00122):
Texas (T104704215-19-30), Arizona (AZ0765), Florida (E871002-24), Louisiana (03054)
Oklahoma (2019-058), North Carolina (681), Arkansas (19-037-0)
Xenco-Dallas (EPA Lab Code: TX01468):
Texas (TX104704295-19-22), Arizona (AZ0809), Arkansas (17-063-0)
Xenco-El Paso (EPA Lab Code: TX00127): Texas (T104704221-19-16)
Xenco-Lubbock (EPA Lab Code: TX00139): Texas (T104704219-19-21)
Xenco-Midland (EPA Lab Code: TX00158): Texas (T104704400-19-19)
Xenco-Carlsbad (LELAP): Louisiana (05092)
Xenco-San Antonio (EPA Lab Code: TNI02385): Texas (T104704534-19-5)
Xenco Phoenix (EPA Lab Code: AZ00901): Arizona (AZ0757)
Xenco-Tampa: Florida (E87429), North Carolina (483)
Page 1 of 60 Final 1.000

xEnicv
X
A PYORIES
02.13.2020
Project Manager: Stan H. Harts
WithersRavenel
115 Mackenan
Cary, NC 27511
Reference: XENCO Report No(s): 650957
520 Judson Church Rd
Project Address:
Stan H. Harts:
We are reporting to you the results of the analyses performed on the samples received under the project name
referenced above and identified with the XENCO Report Number(s) 650957. All results being reported under
this Report Number apply to the samples analyzed and properly identified with a Laboratory ID number.
Subcontracted analyses are identified in this report with either the NELAC certification number of the
subcontract lab in the analyst ID field, or the complete subcontracted report attached to this report.
Unless otherwise noted in a Case Narrative, all data reported in this Analytical Report are in compliance with
NELAC standards. The uncertainty of measurement associated with the results of analysis reported is available
upon request. Should insufficient sample be provided to the laboratory to meet the method and NELAC Matrix
Duplicate and Matrix Spike requirements, then the data will be analyzed, evaluated and reported using all
other available quality control measures.
The validity and integrity of this report will remain intact as long as it is accompanied by this letter and
reproduced in full, unless written approval is granted by XENCO Laboratories. This report will be filed for at
least 5 years in our archives after which time it will be destroyed without further notice, unless otherwise
arranged with you. The samples received, and described as recorded in Report No. 650957 will be filed for 45
days, and after that time they will be properly disposed without further notice, unless otherwise arranged with
you. We reserve the right to return to you any unused samples, extracts or solutions related to them if we
consider so necessary (e.g., samples identified as hazardous waste, sample sizes exceeding analytical standard
practices, controlled substances under regulated protocols, etc).
We thank you for selecting XENCO Laboratories to serve your analytical needs. If you have any questions
concerning this report, please feel free to contact us at any time.
Respectfully,
Chad Bechtold
Project Manager
A Small Business and Minority Company
Houston- Dallas- Midland -Tampa - Phoenix- Lubbock- San Antonio - 8 Paso -Atlanta -New Mexico
Page 2 of 60 Final 1.000

Sample Cross Reference 650957
XENCO
LAQORATC]RIES
WithersRavenel, Cary, NC
520 Judson Church Rd
Sample Id
Matrix Date Collected Sample Depth
Lab Sample Id
SB-3 2.5'
S 01.30.2020 10:45
650957-001
SB-3 5.0'
S 01.30.2020 10:50
650957-002
TW-1
S 01.30.202011:00
650957-003
TW-2
S 01.30.202011:47
650957-004
SB-12.5'
S 01.30.202010:30
650957-005
Page 3 of 60 Final 1.000

CASE NARRATIVE
CDX?�Py
C]RD
Client Name: WithersRavenel
Project Name: 520 Judson Church Rd
Project ID: 03200022
Work Order Number(s): 650957
Sample receipt non conformances and comments:
None
Sample receipt non conformances and comments per sample:
None
Report Date: 02.13.2020
Date Received: 01.31.2020
Analytical non conformances and comments:
Batch: LBA-3115560 EPH by MADEP Method
The Laboratory Control Sample Duplicate (LCSD) recovery for C9 to C18 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons was
slightly below control limits. However, the Laboratory Control Sample (LCS) recoveries met acceptance
criteria.
Samples in the analytical batch are: 650957-001, -002.
Batch: LBA-3115923 SVOCs by SW-846 8270D
The sample 650957-001 was dark and viscous causing high baseline carryover on the instrument. One of
the Internal Standards, Chrysene-D 12, was biased low. This caused the results for the surrogate
Terphenyl-D 14 and the target analyte Pyrene to be biased high.
Batch: LBA-3115927 SVOCs by SW-846 8270D
The precision (RPD) of the Laboratory Control Sample (LCS) and Laboratory Control Sample Duplicate
(LCSD) exceeded control limits for 2-Chlorophenol, 2-methylphenol, 3&4-Methylphenol,
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene, and Phenol. However, the LCS and LCSD recoveries met acceptance criteria,
and these compounds were not detected in the associated sample.
Sample in the analytical batch: 650957-004
Batch: LBA-3116135 EPH by MADEP Method
One of the surrogates, 1-Chlorooctadecane, was recovered below control limits for the sample 650957-
004 due to suspected matrix interference.
Page 4 of 60 Final 1.000

X E N co Hits Summary 650957
LAQORATC]RIEw
WithersRavenel, Cary, NC
520 Judson Church Rd
Below is a summary of the analytes which were found to be present in the samples associated with this work order. This should only
be used in conjunction with the included analytical results.
Sample ID: SB-3 2.5' Sample ID: 650957-001 Date/Time Sampled: 01.30.2020 10:45 Matrix: Solid
Analyte Name
Method
CAS No.
Dil.
Result
RL/PQL
MDL
Units
Qual
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene
SW8260B
95-63-6
50
0.392
0.294
0.0424
mg/kg
D
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene
SW8260B
108-67-8
50
0.324
0.294
0.0479
mg/kg
D
CI I to C22 Aromatics
MA EPH
C11C22
2
364
35.4
17.7
mg/kg
C19 to C36Aliphatic Hydrocarbons
MA EPH
ALHYDRC19C3 50
2160
438
219
mg/kg
D
6
C9 to C18 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons
MA EPH
ALHYDRC9C18 5
174
32.9
16.4
mg/kg
D
Chromium
SW6010C
7440-47-3
1
7.04
0.978
0.0688
mg/kg
Ethylbenzene
SW8260B
100-41-4
1
0.0193
0.00479
0.000541
mg/kg
Isopropylbenzene
SW8260B
98-82-8
1
0.00681
0.00479
0.000727
mg/kg
Lead
SW6010C
7439-92-1
1
4.79
1.96
0.465
mg/kg
Naphthalene
SW8260B
91-20-3
1
0.0237
0.00957
0.00124
mg/kg
Percent Moisture
SM2540G
MOIST
1
8.68
%
Pyrene
SW8270D
129-00-0
1
0.251
0.405
0.0688
mg/kg
J
Sec-Butylbenzene
SW8260B
135-98-8
1
0.0140
0.00479
0.000629
mg/kg
Tetrachloroethylene
SW8260B
127-18-4
50
2.85
0.294
0.00883
mg/kg
D
Toluene
SW8260B
108-88-3
1
0.0256
0.00479
0.000563
mg/kg
Total Xylenes
SW8260B
1330-20-7
1
0.234
0.00479
0.000685
mg/kg
m,p-Xylenes
SW8260B
179601-23-1
1
0.137
0.00957
0.00116
mg/kg
n-Butylbenzene
SW8260B
104-51-8
1
0.0332
0.00479
0.000844
mg/kg
n-Propylbenzene
SW8260B
103-65-1
1
0.0184
0.00479
0.000749
mg/kg
o-Xylene
SW8260B
95-47-6
1
0.0968
0.00479
0.000685
mg/kg
p-Cymcne (p-Isopropyltoluene)
SW8260B
99-87-6
1
0.00701
0.00479
0.000766
mg/kg
Sample ID: SB-3 5.0'
Sample ID: 650957-002
Date/Time Sampled: 01.30.2020 10:50
Matrix:
Solid
Analyte Name
Method
CAS No.
Dil.
Result
RL/PQL
MDL
Units
Qual
Chromium
SW6010C
7440-47-3
1
3.62
1.05
0.0742
mg/kg
Lead
SW6010C
7439-92-1
1
2.07
2.11
0.502
mg/kg
J
Naphthalene
SW8260B
91-20-3
1
0.00130
0.00967
0.00126
mg/kg
J
Percent Moisture
SM2540G
MOIST
1
8.85
%
Sample ID: TW-1
Sample ID: 650957-003
Date/Time Sampled: 01.30.2020 11:00
Matrix: Water
Analyte Name
Method
CAS No.
Dil.
Result
RL/PQL
MDL
Units
Qual
Chromium
SW6010C
7440-47-3
1
0.0142
0.0100
0.000811
mg/L
Lead
SW6010C
7439-92-1
1
0.00740
0.0150
0.00237
mg/L
Sample ID: TW-2
Sample ID: 650957-004
Date/Time Sampled: 01.30.2020 11:47
Matrix: Water
Analyte Name
Method
CAS No.
Dil.
Result
RL/PQL
MDL
Units
Qual
Chromium
SW6010C
7440-47-3
1
0.00930
0.0100
0.000811
mg/L
Lead
SW6010C
7439-92-1
1
0.00275
0.0150
0.00237
mg/L
Methyl Chloride
SW8260B
74-87-3
5
176
5.00
1.25
ug/L
D
Methyl bromide
SW8260B
74-83-9
1
1.94
1.00
0.250
ug/L
Tetrachloroethylene
SW8260B
127-18-4
1
21.7
1.00
0.160
ug/L
Sample ID: SB-12.5'
Sample ID: 650957-005
Date/Time Sampled: 01.30.202010:30
Matrix:
Solid
Page 5 of 60 Final 1.000

xEnicv
LAQORATORIES
Hits Summary 650957
WithersRavenel, Cary, NC
520 Judson Church Rd
Sample ID: 650957-005
Date/Time Sampled: 01.30.2020 10:30
Matrix: Solid
Analyte Name
Method
CAS No. Dil. Result RL/PQL MDL
Units Qual
Chromium
SW6010C
7440-47-3 1 3.21 0.963 0.0678
mg/kg
Lead
SW6010C
7439-92-1 1 1.58 1.93 0.458
mg/kg J
Percent Moisture
SM2540G
MOIST 1 3.88
%
Page 6 of 60 Final 1.000

xEnicv
LAQORATORIES
Certificate of Analytical Results 650957
WithersRavenel, Cary, NC
520 Judson Church Rd
Sample Id: SB-3 2.5' Matrix: Soil Date Received: 0 1.3 1.2020 08:48
Lab Sample Id: 650957-001 Date Collected: 01.30.2020 10:45
Analytical Method: Pb, Cr by SW846 6010C Prep Method: SW3051
Tech: PJB % Moisture: 8.68
Analyst: DEP Date Prep: 02.05.2020 10:45 Basis: Dry Weight
Seq Number: 3115742 SUB: E871002
Parameter Cas Number Result RL NIDL Units Analysis Date Flag Dil
Chromium 7440-47-3 7.04 0.978 0.0688 mg/kg 02.05.202017:00 1
Lead 7439-92-1 4.79 1.96 0.465 mg/kg 02.05.202017:00 1
Analytical Method: EPH by MADEP Method Prep Method: SW3550
Tech: IMM % Moisture: 8.68
Analyst: AEM Date Prep: 01.31.2020 14:10 Basis: Dry Weight
Seq Number: 3115560
Parameter Cas Number Result RL NIDL Units Analysis Date Flag Dil
C9 to C18 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons
ALHYDRC9C11 174
32.9
16.4
mg/kg
02.06.2020 15:49 D 5
C19 to C36Aliphatic Hydrocarbons
ALHYDRCI9C: 2160
438
219
mg/kg
02.05.2020 14:18 D 50
C11 to C22 Aromatics
C11C22 364
35.4
17.7
mg/kg
02.05.2020 15:29 2
Surrogate
Cas Number
% Recovery
Units
Limits
Analysis Date Flag
1-Chlorooctadecane
3386-33-2
59
%
40-140
02.04.2020 14:08
o-Terphenyl
84-15-1
85
%
40-140
02.05.202015:29
2-Fluorobiphenyl
321-60-8
90
%
40-140
02.05.202015:29
Page 7 of 60 Final 1.000

xEnicv
l AQORATORIES
Certificate of Analytical Results 650957
Sample Id: SB-3 2.5'
Lab Sample Id: 650957-001
Analytical Method: SVOCs by SW-846 8270D
Tech: IMM
Analyst: GEP
Seq Number: 3115923
WithersRavenel, Cary, NC
520 Judson Church Rd
Matrix: Soil
Date Collected: 01.30.2020 10:45
Date Prep: 02.05.2020 14:30
Date Received: 0 1.3 1.2020 08:48
Prep Method: SW3550
% Moisture: 8.68
Basis: Dry Weight
Parameter
Cas Number
Result
RL
MDL
Units
Analysis Date
Flag
Dil
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
120-82-1
<0.0716
0.405
0.0716
mg/kg
02.07.2020 08:13
U
1
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
95-50-1
<0.0655
0.405
0.0655
mg/kg
02.07.2020 08:13
U
1
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
541-73-1
<0.0639
0.405
0.0639
mg/kg
02.07.2020 08:13
U
1
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
106-46-7
<0.0448
0.365
0.0448
mg/kg
02.07.2020 08:13
U
1
1-Methylnaphthalene
90-12-0
<0.0794
0.405
0.0794
mg/kg
02.07.2020 08:13
U
1
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
95-95-4
<0.0745
0.405
0.0745
mg/kg
02.07.2020 08:13
U
1
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
88-06-2
<0.0781
0.405
0.0781
mg/kg
02.07.2020 08:13
U
1
2,4-Dichlorophenol
120-83-2
<0.0514
0.405
0.0514
mg/kg
02.07.2020 08:13
U
I
2,4-Dimethylphenol
105-67-9
<0.0736
0.405
0.0736
mg/kg
02.07.2020 08:13
U
I
2,4-Dinitrophenol
51-28-5
<0.0651
0.405
0.0651
mg/kg
02.07.2020 08:13
U
I
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
121-14-2
<0.0651
0.405
0.0651
mg/kg
02.07.2020 08:13
U
I
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
606-20-2
<0.0526
0.405
0.0526
mg/kg
02.07.2020 08:13
U
1
2-Chloronaphthalene
91-58-7
<0.0736
0.405
0.0736
mg/kg
02.07.2020 08:13
U
1
2-Chlorophenol
95-57-8
<0.0724
0.405
0.0724
mg/kg
02.07.2020 08:13
U
I
2-Methylnaphthalene
91-57-6
<0.0619
0.405
0.0619
mg/kg
02.07.2020 08:13
U
I
2-methylphenol
95-48-7
<0.0566
0.405
0.0566
mg/kg
02.07.2020 08:13
U
I
2-Nitroaniline
88-74-4
<0.0566
0.405
0.0566
mg/kg
02.07.2020 08:13
U
1
2-Nitrophenol
88-75-5
<0.0510
0.405
0.0510
mg/kg
02.07.2020 08:13
U
1
3&4-Methylphenol
15831-10-4
<0.120
1.21
0.120
mg/kg
02.07.2020 08:13
U
1
3,3-Dichlorobenzidine
91-94-1
<0.0591
0.405
0.0591
mg/kg
02.07.2020 08:13
U
1
3-Nitroaniline
99-09-2
<0.0559
0.405
0.0559
mg/kg
02.07.2020 08:13
U
I
4,6-dinitro-2-methyl phenol
534-52-1
<0.0704
0.405
0.0704
mg/kg
02.07.2020 08:13
U
I
4-Bromophenyl-phenylether
101-55-3
<0.0688
0.405
0.0688
mg/kg
02.07.2020 08:13
U
I
4-chloro-3-methylphenol
59-50-7
<0.0576
0.405
0.0576
mg/kg
02.07.2020 08:13
U
I
4-Chloroaniline
106-47-8
<0.0672
0.405
0.0672
mg/kg
02.07.2020 08:13
U
1
4-Chlorophenyl-phenyl ether
7005-72-3
<0.0769
0.405
0.0769
mg/kg
02.07.2020 08:13
U
1
4-Nitroaniline
100-01-6
<0.0615
0.405
0.0615
mg/kg
02.07.2020 08:13
U
1
4-Nitrophenol
100-02-7
<0.0498
0.405
0.0498
mg/kg
02.07.2020 08:13
U
I
Acenaphthene
83-32-9
<0.0566
0.405
0.0566
mg/kg
02.07.2020 08:13
U
I
Acenaphthylene
208-96-8
<0.0689
0.405
0.0689
mg/kg
02.07.2020 08:13
U
1
Aniline (Phenylamine, Aminobenzene)
62-53-3
<0.0445
0.405
0.0445
mg/kg
02.07.2020 08:13
U
1
Anthracene
120-12-7
<0.0599
0.405
0.0599
mg/kg
02.07.2020 08:13
U
1
Benzo(a)anthracene
56-55-3
<0.0655
0.405
0.0655
mg/kg
02.07.2020 08:13
U
1
Benzo(a)pyrene
50-32-8
<0.0595
0.405
0.0595
mg/kg
02.07.2020 08:13
U
I
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
205-99-2
<0.0660
0.405
0.0660
mg/kg
02.07.2020 08:13
U
I
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene
191-24-2
<0.0667
0.405
0.0667
mg/kg
02.07.2020 08:13
U
I
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
207-08-9
<0.0696
0.405
0.0696
mg/kg
02.07.2020 08:13
U
I
Benzoic Acid
65-85-0
<0.0639
0.405
0.0639
mg/kg
02.07.2020 08:13
U
I
Benzyl Butyl Phthalate
85-68-7
<0.0608
0.405
0.0608
mg/kg
02.07.2020 08:13
U
1
Page 8 of 60 Final 1.000

xEnicv
LAQORATORIES
Certificate of Analytical Results 650957
Sample Id: SB-3 2.5'
Lab Sample Id: 650957-001
Analytical Method: SVOCs by SW-846 8270D
Tech: IMM
Analyst: GEP
Seq Number: 3115923
WithersRavenel, Cary, NC
520 Judson Church Rd
Matrix: Soil
Date Collected: 01.30.2020 10:45
Date Prep: 02.05.2020 14:30
Date Received: 0 1.3 1.2020 08:48
Prep Method: SW3550
% Moisture: 8.68
Basis: Dry Weight
Parameter Cas Number Result RL MDL Units Analysis Date Flag Dil
bis(2-chloroethoxy) methane
111-91-1
<0.0486
0.405
0.0486
mg/kg
02.07.2020 08:13
U
bis(2-chloroethyl) ether
111-44-4
<0.0575
0.405
0.0575
mg/kg
02.07.2020 08:13
U
bis(2-chloroisopropyl) ether
39638-32-9
<0.0547
0.405
0.0547
mg/kg
02.07.2020 08:13
U
bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate
117-81-7
<0.0656
0.405
0.0656
mg/kg
02.07.2020 08:13
U
Chrysene
218-01-9
<0.0538
0.405
0.0538
mg/kg
02.07.2020 08:13
U
Dibenz(a,h)Anthracene
53-70-3
<0.0785
0.405
0.0785
mg/kg
02.07.2020 08:13
U
Dibenzof Iran
132-64-9
<0.0518
0.405
0.0518
mg/kg
02.07.2020 08:13
U
Diethyl Phthalate
84-66-2
<0.0611
0.405
0.0611
mg/kg
02.07.2020 08:13
U
Dimethyl Phthalate
131-11-3
<0.0651
0.405
0.0651
mg/kg
02.07.2020 08:13
U
di-n-Butyl Phthalate
84-74-2
<0.0745
0.405
0.0745
mg/kg
02.07.2020 08:13
U
di-n-Octyl Phthalate
117-84-0
<0.0672
0.405
0.0672
mg/kg
02.07.2020 08:13
U
Fluoranthene
206-44-0
<0.0526
0.405
0.0526
mg/kg
02.07.2020 08:13
U
Fluorene
86-73-7
<0.0495
0.405
0.0495
mg/kg
02.07.2020 08:13
U
Hexachlorobenzene
118-74-1
<0.0677
0.405
0.0677
mg/kg
02.07.2020 08:13
U
Hexachlorobutadiene
87-68-3
<0.0449
0.405
0.0449
mg/kg
02.07.2020 08:13
U
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
77-47-4
<0.0696
0.405
0.0696
mg/kg
02.07.2020 08:13
U
Hexachloroethane
67-72-1
<0.0628
0.405
0.0628
mg/kg
02.07.2020 08:13
U
Indeno(1,2,3-c,d)Pyrene
193-39-5
<0.0737
0.405
0.0737
mg/kg
02.07.2020 08:13
U
Isophorone
78-59-1
<0.0417
0.405
0.0417
mg/kg
02.07.2020 08:13
U
Naphthalene
91-20-3
<0.0648
0.405
0.0648
mg/kg
02.07.2020 08:13
U
Nitrobenzene
98-95-3
<0.0721
0.405
0.0721
mg/kg
02.07.2020 08:13
U
N-Nitrosodi-n-Propylamine
621-64-7
<0.0579
0.405
0.0579
mg/kg
02.07.2020 08:13
U
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine
86-30-6
<0.0849
0.405
0.0849
mg/kg
02.07.2020 08:13
U
Pentachlorophenol
87-86-5
<0.0733
0.405
0.0733
mg/kg
02.07.2020 08:13
U
Phenanthrene
85-01-8
<0.0672
0.405
0.0672
mg/kg
02.07.2020 08:13
U
Phenol
108-95-2
<0.0568
0.405
0.0568
mg/kg
02.07.2020 08:13
U
Pyrene
129-00-0
0.251
0.405
0.0688
mg/kg
02.07.2020 08:13
1
Pyridine
110-86-1
<0.0769
0.405
0.0769
mg/kg
02.07.2020 08:13
U
Surrogate
Cas Number
% Recovery
Units
Limits
Analysis Date
Flag
2-Fluorophenol
367-12-4
65
%
25-121
02.07.2020 08:13
Nitrobenzene-d5
4165-60-0
67
%
23-120
02.07.2020 08:13
2-Fluorobiphenyl
321-60-8
74
%
30-115
02.07.2020 08:13
2,4,6-Tribromophenol
118-79-6
105
%
19-122
02.07.2020 08:13
Terphenyl-1314
1718-51-0
148
%
18-137
02.07.2020 08:13
**
Phenol-d5
4165-62-2
68
%
15-110
02.07.2020 08:13
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
l
Page 9 of 60 Final 1.000

xEnicv
L AQORATORIES
Certificate of Analytical Results 650957
Sample Id: SB-3 2.5'
Lab Sample Id: 650957-001
Analytical Method: VOCs by SW-846 8260B
Tech: JNL
Analyst: JNL
Seq Number: 3115235
WithersRavenel, Cary, NC
520 Judson Church Rd
Matrix: Soil
Date Collected: 01.30.2020 10:45
Date Prep: 01.31.2020 11:35
Date Received: 0 1.3 1.2020 08:48
Prep Method: SW5035A
% Moisture: 8.68
Basis: Dry Weight
Parameter
Cas Number
Result
RL
MDL
Units
Analysis Date
Flag
Dil
Benzene
71-43-2
<0.000491
0.00479
0.000491
mg/kg
01.31.2020 16:31
U
1
Bromobenzene
108-86-1
<0.000817
0.00479
0.000817
mg/kg
01.31.2020 16:31
U
1
Bromochloromethane
74-97-5
<0.00101
0.00957
0.00101
mg/kg
01.31.2020 16:31
U
1
Bromodichloromethane
75-27-4
<0.000480
0.00479
0.000480
mg/kg
01.31.2020 16:31
U
1
Bromoform
75-25-2
<0.000918
0.00479
0.000918
mg/kg
01.31.2020 16:31
U
1
Methyl bromide
74-83-9
<0.000239
0.00479
0.000239
mg/kg
01.31.2020 16:31
U
1
tert-Butylbenzene
98-06-6
<0.000798
0.00479
0.000798
mg/kg
01.31.2020 16:31
U
1
Sec-Butylbenzene
135-98-8
0.0140
0.00479
0.000629
mg/kg
01.31.2020 16:31
1
n-Butylbenzene
104-51-8
0.0332
0.00479
0.000844
mg/kg
01.31.2020 16:31
1
Carbon Tetrachloride
56-23-5
<0.000710
0.00479
0.000710
mg/kg
01.31.2020 16:31
U
1
Chlorobenzene
108-90-7
<0.000554
0.00479
0.000554
mg/kg
01.31.2020 16:31
U
1
Chloroethane
75-00-3
<0.00234
0.00957
0.00234
mg/kg
01.31.2020 16:31
U
1
Chloroform
67-66-3
<0.000709
0.00479
0.000709
mg/kg
01.31.2020 16:31
U
1
Methyl Chloride
74-87-3
<0.00220
0.00957
0.00220
mg/kg
01.31.2020 16:31
U
I
2-Chlorotoluene
95-49-8
<0.000678
0.00479
0.000678
mg/kg
01.31.2020 16:31
U
I
4-Chlorotoluene
106-43-4
<0.000529
0.00479
0.000529
mg/kg
01.31.2020 16:31
U
I
p-Cymene (p-Isopropyltoluene)
99-87-6
0.00701
0.00479
0.000766
mg/kg
01.31.2020 16:31
1
1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane
96-12-8
<0.000836
0.00479
0.000836
mg/kg
01.31.2020 16:31
U
1
Dibromochloromethane
124-48-1
<0.000951
0.00479
0.000951
mg/kg
01.31.2020 16:31
U
1
1,2-Dibromoethane
106-93-4
<0.000826
0.00479
0.000826
mg/kg
01.31.2020 16:31
U
1
Methylene Bromide
74-95-3
<0.000574
0.00479
0.000574
mg/kg
01.31.2020 16:31
U
1
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
95-50-1
<0.00123
0.00479
0.00123
mg/kg
01.31.2020 16:31
U
1
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
541-73-1
<0.000954
0.00479
0.000954
mg/kg
01.31.2020 16:31
U
1
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
106-46-7
<0.000655
0.00479
0.000655
mg/kg
01.31.2020 16:31
U
1
Dichlorodifluoromethane
75-71-8
<0.00113
0.00479
0.00113
mg/kg
01.31.2020 16:31
U
1
1,2-Dichloroethane
107-06-2
<0.000571
0.00479
0.000571
mg/kg
01.31.2020 16:31
U
1
1, 1 -Dichloroethane
75-34-3
<0.000768
0.00479
0.000768
mg/kg
01.31.2020 16:31
U
1
trans-1,2-dichloroethylene
156-60-5
<0.000747
0.00479
0.000747
mg/kg
01.31.2020 16:31
U
I
cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene
156-59-2
<0.000201
0.00479
0.000201
mg/kg
01.31.2020 16:31
U
I
1, 1 -Dichloroethene
75-35-4
<0.00111
0.00479
0.00111
mg/kg
01.31.2020 16:31
U
1
2,2-Dichloropropane
594-20-7
<0.000573
0.00479
0.000573
mg/kg
01.31.2020 16:31
U
1
1,3-Dichloropropane
142-28-9
<0.000659
0.00479
0.000659
mg/kg
01.31.2020 16:31
U
1
1,2-Dichloropropane
78-87-5
<0.000889
0.00479
0.000889
mg/kg
01.31.2020 16:31
U
1
trans- l,3-dichloropropene
10061-02-6
<0.000641
0.00479
0.000641
mg/kg
01.31.2020 16:31
U
1
1, 1 -Dichloropropene
563-58-6
<0.000516
0.00479
0.000516
mg/kg
01.31.2020 16:31
U
1
cis- 1,3 -Dichloropropene
10061-01-5
<0.0000957
0.00479
0.0000957
mg/kg
01.31.2020 16:31
U
1
Ethylbenzene
100-41-4
0.0193
0.00479
0.000541
mg/kg
01.31.2020 16:31
1
Hexachlorobutadiene
87-68-3
<0.000816
0.00479
0.000816
mg/kg
01.31.2020 16:31
U
1
Isopropylbenzene
98-82-8
0.00681
0.00479
0.000727
mg/kg
01.31.2020 16:31
1
Page 10 of 60 Final 1.000

xEnicv
l AQORATORIES
Certificate of Analytical Results 650957
Sample Id: SB-3 2.5'
Lab Sample Id: 650957-001
Analytical Method: VOCs by SW-846 8260B
Tech: JNL
Analyst: JNL
Seq Number: 3115235
WithersRavenel, Cary, NC
520 Judson Church Rd
Matrix: Soil
Date Collected: 01.30.2020 10:45
Date Prep: 01.31.2020 11:35
Date Received: 0 1.3 1.2020 08:48
Prep Method: SW5035A
% Moisture: 8.68
Basis: Dry Weight
Parameter Cas Number Result RL MDL Units Analysis Date Flag Dil
Methylene Chloride
75-09-2
<0.00207
0.00957
0.00207
mg/kg
01.31.2020 16:31
U
MTBE
1634-04-4
<0.000663
0.00479
0.000663
mg/kg
01.31.2020 16:31
U
Naphthalene
91-20-3
0.0237
0.00957
0.00124
mg/kg
01.31.2020 16:31
n-Propylbenzene
103-65-1
0.0184
0.00479
0.000749
mg/kg
01.31.2020 16:31
Styrene
100-42-5
<0.000710
0.00479
0.000710
mg/kg
01.31.2020 16:31
U
1, 1, 1,2-Tetrachloroethane
630-20-6
<0.000503
0.00479
0.000503
mg/kg
01.31.2020 16:31
U
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
79-34-5
<0.00114
0.00479
0.00114
mg/kg
01.31.2020 16:31
U
Tetrachloroethylene
127-18-4
2.85
0.294
0.00883
mg/kg
02.03.202013:50
D
Toluene
108-88-3
0.0256
0.00479
0.000563
mg/kg
01.31.2020 16:31
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene
87-61-6
<0.000549
0.00479
0.000549
mg/kg
01.31.2020 16:31
U
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
120-82-1
<0.000836
0.00479
0.000836
mg/kg
01.31.2020 16:31
U
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
79-00-5
<0.000641
0.00479
0.000641
mg/kg
01.31.2020 16:31
U
1, 1, 1 -Trichloroethane
71-55-6
<0.000721
0.00479
0.000721
mg/kg
01.31.2020 16:31
U
Trichloroethylene
79-01-6
<0.000677
0.00479
0.000677
mg/kg
01.31.2020 16:31
U
Trichlorofluoromethane
75-69-4
<0.00336
0.00479
0.00336
mg/kg
01.31.2020 16:31
U
1,2,3-Trichloropropane
96-18-4
<0.00158
0.00479
0.00158
mg/kg
01.31.2020 16:31
U
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene
95-63-6
0.392
0.294
0.0424
mg/kg
02.03.202013:50
D
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene
108-67-8
0.324
0.294
0.0479
mg/kg
02.03.202013:50
D
Vinyl Chloride
75-01-4
<0.00192
0.00957
0.00192
mg/kg
01.31.2020 16:31
U
o-Xylene
95-47-6
0.0968
0.00479
0.000685
mg/kg
01.31.2020 16:31
m,p-Xylenes
179601-23-1
0.137
0.00957
0.00116
mg/kg
01.31.2020 16:31
Total Xylenes
1330-20-7
0.234
0.00479
0.000685
mg/kg
01.31.2020 16:31
Surrogate
Cas Number
% Recovery
Units
Limits
Analysis Date
Flag
1,2-Dichloroethane-D4
17060-07-0
127
%
53-159
01.31.2020 16:31
Toluene-D8
2037-26-5
126
%
70-130
01.31.2020 16:31
4-Bromofluorobenzene
460-00-4
104
%
30-180
01.31.2020 16:31
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
50
1
1
1
1
1
1
l
1
50
50
1
1
1
1
Page 11 of 60 Final 1.000

xEnicv
L AQORATORIES
Certificate of Analytical Results 650957
WithersRavenel, Cary, NC
520 Judson Church Rd
Sample Id: SB-3 5.0' Matrix: Soil Date Received: 0 1.3 1.2020 08:48
Lab Sample Id: 650957-002 Date Collected: 01.30.2020 10:50
Analytical Method: Pb, Cr by SW846 6010C Prep Method: SW3051
Tech: PJB % Moisture: 8.85
Analyst: DEP Date Prep: 02.05.2020 10:45 Basis: Dry Weight
Seq Number: 3115742 SUB: E871002
Parameter Cas Number Result RL MDL Units Analysis Date Flag Dil
Chromium 7440-47-3 3.62 1.05 0.0742 mg/kg 02.05.202017:29 1
Lead 7439-92-1 2.07 2.11 0.502 mg/kg 02.05.202017:29 J 1
Analytical Method: EPH by MADEP Method Prep Method: SW3550
Tech: IMM % Moisture: 8.85
Analyst: AEM Date Prep: 01.31.2020 14:10 Basis: Dry Weight
Seq Number: 3115560
Parameter Cas Number Result RL MDL Units Analysis Date Flag Dil
C9 to C18 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons
ALHYDRC9Cll <6.46
12.9
6.46
mg/kg
02.04.2020 12:09
U 1
C19 to C36Aliphatic Hydrocarbons
ALHYDRCI9C: <8.61
17.2
8.61
mg/kg
02.04.2020 12:09
U 1
C11 to C22 Aromatics
Cl lC22 <9.15
18.3
9.15
mg/kg
02.05.2020 10:00
U 1
Surrogate
Cas Number
% Recovery
Units
Limits
Analysis Date
Flag
1-Chlorooctadecane
3386-33-2
63
%
40-140
02.04.2020 12:09
o-Terphenyl
84-15-1
75
%
40-140
02.05.202010:00
2-Fluorobiphenyl
321-60-8
86
%
40-140
02.05.202010:00
Page 12 of 60 Final 1.000

xEnicv
l AQORATORIES
Certificate of Analytical Results 650957
Sample Id: SB-3 5.0'
Lab Sample Id: 650957-002
Analytical Method: SVOCs by SW-846 8270D
Tech: IMM
Analyst: GEP
Seq Number: 3115923
WithersRavenel, Cary, NC
520 Judson Church Rd
Matrix: Soil
Date Collected: 01.30.2020 10:50
Date Prep: 02.05.2020 14:30
Date Received: 0 1.3 1.2020 08:48
Prep Method: SW3550
% Moisture: 8.85
Basis: Dry Weight
Parameter
Cas Number
Result
RL
MDL
Units
Analysis Date
Flag
Dil
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
120-82-1
<0.0711
0.402
0.0711
mg/kg
02.07.2020 02:05
U
1
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
95-50-1
<0.0650
0.402
0.0650
mg/kg
02.07.2020 02:05
U
1
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
541-73-1
<0.0635
0.402
0.0635
mg/kg
02.07.2020 02:05
U
1
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
106-46-7
<0.0445
0.362
0.0445
mg/kg
02.07.2020 02:05
U
1
1-Methylnaphthalene
90-12-0
<0.0788
0.402
0.0788
mg/kg
02.07.2020 02:05
U
1
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
95-95-4
<0.0739
0.402
0.0739
mg/kg
02.07.2020 02:05
U
1
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
88-06-2
<0.0776
0.402
0.0776
mg/kg
02.07.2020 02:05
U
1
2,4-Dichlorophenol
120-83-2
<0.0510
0.402
0.0510
mg/kg
02.07.2020 02:05
U
1
2,4-Dimethylphenol
105-67-9
<0.0731
0.402
0.0731
mg/kg
02.07.2020 02:05
U
1
2,4-Dinitrophenol
51-28-5
<0.0647
0.402
0.0647
mg/kg
02.07.2020 02:05
U
1
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
121-14-2
<0.0647
0.402
0.0647
mg/kg
02.07.2020 02:05
U
1
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
606-20-2
<0.0522
0.402
0.0522
mg/kg
02.07.2020 02:05
U
1
2-Chloronaphthalene
91-58-7
<0.0731
0.402
0.0731
mg/kg
02.07.2020 02:05
U
1
2-Chlorophenol
95-57-8
<0.0719
0.402
0.0719
mg/kg
02.07.2020 02:05
U
I
2-Methylnaphthalene
91-57-6
<0.0614
0.402
0.0614
mg/kg
02.07.2020 02:05
U
I
2-methylphenol
95-48-7
<0.0562
0.402
0.0562
mg/kg
02.07.2020 02:05
U
I
2-Nitroaniline
88-74-4
<0.0562
0.402
0.0562
mg/kg
02.07.2020 02:05
U
1
2-Nitrophenol
88-75-5
<0.0507
0.402
0.0507
mg/kg
02.07.2020 02:05
U
1
3&4-Methylphenol
15831-10-4
<0.119
1.21
0.119
mg/kg
02.07.2020 02:05
U
1
3,3-Dichlorobenzidine
91-94-1
<0.0586
0.402
0.0586
mg/kg
02.07.2020 02:05
U
1
3-Nitroaniline
99-09-2
<0.0555
0.402
0.0555
mg/kg
02.07.2020 02:05
U
1
4,6-dinitro-2-methyl phenol
534-52-1
<0.0699
0.402
0.0699
mg/kg
02.07.2020 02:05
U
1
4-Bromophenyl-phenylether
101-55-3
<0.0683
0.402
0.0683
mg/kg
02.07.2020 02:05
U
1
4-chloro-3-methylphenol
59-50-7
<0.0572
0.402
0.0572
mg/kg
02.07.2020 02:05
U
1
4-Chloroaniline
106-47-8
<0.0667
0.402
0.0667
mg/kg
02.07.2020 02:05
U
1
4-Chlorophenyl-phenyl ether
7005-72-3
<0.0764
0.402
0.0764
mg/kg
02.07.2020 02:05
U
1
4-Nitroaniline
100-01-6
<0.0611
0.402
0.0611
mg/kg
02.07.2020 02:05
U
1
4-Nitrophenol
100-02-7
<0.0495
0.402
0.0495
mg/kg
02.07.2020 02:05
U
I
Acenaphthene
83-32-9
<0.0562
0.402
0.0562
mg/kg
02.07.2020 02:05
U
I
Acenaphthylene
208-96-8
<0.0684
0.402
0.0684
mg/kg
02.07.2020 02:05
U
1
Aniline (Phenylamine, Aminobenzene)
62-53-3
<0.0442
0.402
0.0442
mg/kg
02.07.2020 02:05
U
1
Anthracene
120-12-7
<0.0595
0.402
0.0595
mg/kg
02.07.2020 02:05
U
1
Benzo(a)anthracene
56-55-3
<0.0650
0.402
0.0650
mg/kg
02.07.2020 02:05
U
1
Benzo(a)pyrene
50-32-8
<0.0591
0.402
0.0591
mg/kg
02.07.2020 02:05
U
1
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
205-99-2
<0.0655
0.402
0.0655
mg/kg
02.07.2020 02:05
U
1
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene
191-24-2
<0.0662
0.402
0.0662
mg/kg
02.07.2020 02:05
U
1
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
207-08-9
<0.0691
0.402
0.0691
mg/kg
02.07.2020 02:05
U
1
Benzoic Acid
65-85-0
<0.0635
0.402
0.0635
mg/kg
02.07.2020 02:05
U
1
Benzyl Butyl Phthalate
85-68-7
<0.0603
0.402
0.0603
mg/kg
02.07.2020 02:05
U
1
Page 13 of 60 Final 1.000

xEnicv
LAQORATORIES
Certificate of Analytical Results 650957
Sample Id: SB-3 5.0'
Lab Sample Id: 650957-002
Analytical Method: SVOCs by SW-846 8270D
Tech: IMM
Analyst: GEP
Seq Number: 3115923
WithersRavenel, Cary, NC
520 Judson Church Rd
Matrix: Soil
Date Collected: 01.30.2020 10:50
Date Prep: 02.05.2020 14:30
Date Received: 0 1.3 1.2020 08:48
Prep Method: SW3550
% Moisture: 8.85
Basis: Dry Weight
Parameter Cas Number Result RL MDL Units Analysis Date Flag Dil
bis(2-chloroethoxy) methane
111-91-1
<0.0482
0.402
0.0482
mg/kg
02.07.2020 02:05
U
bis(2-chloroethyl) ether
111-44-4
<0.0571
0.402
0.0571
mg/kg
02.07.2020 02:05
U
bis(2-chloroisopropyl) ether
39638-32-9
<0.0543
0.402
0.0543
mg/kg
02.07.2020 02:05
U
bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate
117-81-7
<0.0652
0.402
0.0652
mg/kg
02.07.2020 02:05
U
Chrysene
218-01-9
<0.0535
0.402
0.0535
mg/kg
02.07.2020 02:05
U
Dibenz(a,h)Anthracene
53-70-3
<0.0779
0.402
0.0779
mg/kg
02.07.2020 02:05
U
Dibenzofiiran
132-64-9
<0.0514
0.402
0.0514
mg/kg
02.07.2020 02:05
U
Diethyl Phthalate
84-66-2
<0.0607
0.402
0.0607
mg/kg
02.07.2020 02:05
U
Dimethyl Phthalate
131-11-3
<0.0647
0.402
0.0647
mg/kg
02.07.2020 02:05
U
di-n-Butyl Phthalate
84-74-2
<0.0739
0.402
0.0739
mg/kg
02.07.2020 02:05
U
di-n-Octyl Phthalate
117-84-0
<0.0667
0.402
0.0667
mg/kg
02.07.2020 02:05
U
Fluoranthene
206-44-0
<0.0522
0.402
0.0522
mg/kg
02.07.2020 02:05
U
Fluorene
86-73-7
<0.0491
0.402
0.0491
mg/kg
02.07.2020 02:05
U
Hexachlorobenzene
118-74-1
<0.0672
0.402
0.0672
mg/kg
02.07.2020 02:05
U
Hexachlorobutadiene
87-68-3
<0.0446
0.402
0.0446
mg/kg
02.07.2020 02:05
U
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
77-47-4
<0.0691
0.402
0.0691
mg/kg
02.07.2020 02:05
U
Hexachloroethane
67-72-1
<0.0624
0.402
0.0624
mg/kg
02.07.2020 02:05
U
Indeno(1,2,3-c,d)Pyrene
193-39-5
<0.0732
0.402
0.0732
mg/kg
02.07.2020 02:05
U
Isophorone
78-59-1
<0.0414
0.402
0.0414
mg/kg
02.07.2020 02:05
U
Naphthalene
91-20-3
<0.0643
0.402
0.0643
mg/kg
02.07.2020 02:05
U
Nitrobenzene
98-95-3
<0.0716
0.402
0.0716
mg/kg
02.07.2020 02:05
U
N-Nitrosodi-n-Propylamine
621-64-7
<0.0574
0.402
0.0574
mg/kg
02.07.2020 02:05
U
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine
86-30-6
<0.0843
0.402
0.0843
mg/kg
02.07.2020 02:05
U
Pentachlorophenol
87-86-5
<0.0728
0.402
0.0728
mg/kg
02.07.2020 02:05
U
Phenanthrene
85-01-8
<0.0667
0.402
0.0667
mg/kg
02.07.2020 02:05
U
Phenol
108-95-2
<0.0564
0.402
0.0564
mg/kg
02.07.2020 02:05
U
Pyrene
129-00-0
<0.0683
0.402
0.0683
mg/kg
02.07.2020 02:05
U
Pyridine
110-86-1
<0.0764
0.402
0.0764
mg/kg
02.07.2020 02:05
U
Surrogate
Cas Number
% Recovery
Units
Limits
Analysis Date
Flag
2-Fluorophenol
367-12-4
74
%
25-121
02.07.2020 02:05
Nitrobenzene-d5
4165-60-0
75
%
23-120
02.07.2020 02:05
2-Fluorobiphenyl
321-60-8
71
%
30-115
02.07.2020 02:05
2,4,6-Tribromophenol
118-79-6
93
%
19-122
02.07.2020 02:05
Terphenyl-1314
1718-51-0
71
%
18-137
02.07.2020 02:05
Phenol-d5
4165-62-2
78
%
15-110
02.07.2020 02:05
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
l
Page 14 of 60 Final 1.000

xEnicv
L AQORATORIES
Certificate of Analytical Results 650957
Sample Id: SB-3 5.0'
Lab Sample Id: 650957-002
Analytical Method: VOCs by SW-846 8260B
Tech: JNL
Analyst: JNL
Seq Number: 3115235
WithersRavenel, Cary, NC
520 Judson Church Rd
Matrix: Soil
Date Collected: 01.30.2020 10:50
Date Prep: 01.31.2020 11:35
Date Received: 0 1.3 1.2020 08:48
Prep Method: SW5035A
% Moisture: 8.85
Basis: Dry Weight
Parameter
Cas Number
Result
RL
MDL
Units
Analysis Date
Flag
Dil
Benzene
71-43-2
<0.000496
0.00484
0.000496
mg/kg
01.31.2020 16:50
U
1
Bromobenzene
108-86-1
<0.000826
0.00484
0.000826
mg/kg
01.31.2020 16:50
U
1
Bromochloromethane
74-97-5
<0.00103
0.00967
0.00103
mg/kg
01.31.2020 16:50
U
1
Bromodichloromethane
75-27-4
<0.000485
0.00484
0.000485
mg/kg
01.31.2020 16:50
U
1
Bromoform
75-25-2
<0.000928
0.00484
0.000928
mg/kg
01.31.2020 16:50
U
1
Methyl bromide
74-83-9
<0.000242
0.00484
0.000242
mg/kg
01.31.2020 16:50
U
1
tert-Butylbenzene
98-06-6
<0.000807
0.00484
0.000807
mg/kg
01.31.2020 16:50
U
1
Sec-Butylbenzene
135-98-8
<0.000636
0.00484
0.000636
mg/kg
01.31.2020 16:50
U
I
n-Butylbenzene
104-51-8
<0.000853
0.00484
0.000853
mg/kg
01.31.2020 16:50
U
I
Carbon Tetrachloride
56-23-5
<0.000718
0.00484
0.000718
mg/kg
01.31.2020 16:50
U
I
Chlorobenzene
108-90-7
<0.000560
0.00484
0.000560
mg/kg
01.31.2020 16:50
U
I
Chloroethane
75-00-3
<0.00236
0.00967
0.00236
mg/kg
01.31.2020 16:50
U
1
Chloroform
67-66-3
<0.000717
0.00484
0.000717
mg/kg
01.31.2020 16:50
U
1
Methyl Chloride
74-87-3
<0.00223
0.00967
0.00223
mg/kg
01.31.2020 16:50
U
I
2-Chlorotoluene
95-49-8
<0.000685
0.00484
0.000685
mg/kg
01.31.2020 16:50
U
I
4-Chlorotoluene
106-43-4
<0.000535
0.00484
0.000535
mg/kg
01.31.2020 16:50
U
I
p-Cymene (p-Isopropyltoluene)
99-87-6
<0.000774
0.00484
0.000774
mg/kg
01.31.2020 16:50
U
1
1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane
96-12-8
<0.000845
0.00484
0.000845
mg/kg
01.31.2020 16:50
U
1
Dibromochloromethane
124-48-1
<0.000962
0.00484
0.000962
mg/kg
01.31.2020 16:50
U
1
1,2-Dibromoethane
106-93-4
<0.000835
0.00484
0.000835
mg/kg
01.31.2020 16:50
U
1
Methylene Bromide
74-95-3
<0.000580
0.00484
0.000580
mg/kg
01.31.2020 16:50
U
I
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
95-50-1
<0.00125
0.00484
0.00125
mg/kg
01.31.2020 16:50
U
I
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
541-73-1
<0.000965
0.00484
0.000965
mg/kg
01.31.2020 16:50
U
I
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
106-46-7
<0.000662
0.00484
0.000662
mg/kg
01.31.2020 16:50
U
I
Dichlorodifluoromethane
75-71-8
<0.00114
0.00484
0.00114
mg/kg
01.31.2020 16:50
U
1
1,2-Dichloroethane
107-06-2
<0.000578
0.00484
0.000578
mg/kg
01.31.2020 16:50
U
1
1, 1 -Dichloroethane
75-34-3
<0.000776
0.00484
0.000776
mg/kg
01.31.2020 16:50
U
1
trans-1,2-dichloroethylene
156-60-5
<0.000755
0.00484
0.000755
mg/kg
01.31.2020 16:50
U
I
cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene
156-59-2
<0.000203
0.00484
0.000203
mg/kg
01.31.2020 16:50
U
I
1, 1 -Dichloroethene
75-35-4
<0.00112
0.00484
0.00112
mg/kg
01.31.2020 16:50
U
1
2,2-Dichloropropane
594-20-7
<0.000580
0.00484
0.000580
mg/kg
01.31.2020 16:50
U
1
1,3-Dichloropropane
142-28-9
<0.000666
0.00484
0.000666
mg/kg
01.31.2020 16:50
U
1
1,2-Dichloropropane
78-87-5
<0.000899
0.00484
0.000899
mg/kg
01.31.2020 16:50
U
1
trans- l,3-dichloropropene
10061-02-6
<0.000648
0.00484
0.000648
mg/kg
01.31.2020 16:50
U
I
1, 1 -Dichloropropene
563-58-6
<0.000521
0.00484
0.000521
mg/kg
01.31.2020 16:50
U
I
cis- 1,3 -Dichloropropene
10061-01-5
<0.0000967
0.00484
0.0000967
mg/kg
01.31.2020 16:50
U
I
Ethylbenzene
100-41-4
<0.000547
0.00484
0.000547
mg/kg
01.31.2020 16:50
U
I
Hexachlorobutadiene
87-68-3
<0.000824
0.00484
0.000824
mg/kg
01.31.2020 16:50
U
I
Isopropylbenzene
98-82-8
<0.000734
0.00484
0.000734
mg/kg
01.31.2020 16:50
U
1
Page 15 of 60 Final 1.000

xEnicv
l AQORATORIES
Certificate of Analytical Results 650957
Sample Id: SB-3 5.0'
Lab Sample Id: 650957-002
Analytical Method: VOCs by SW-846 8260B
Tech: JNL
Analyst: JNL
Seq Number: 3115235
WithersRavenel, Cary, NC
520 Judson Church Rd
Matrix: Soil
Date Collected: 01.30.2020 10:50
Date Prep: 01.31.2020 11:35
Date Received: 0 1.3 1.2020 08:48
Prep Method: SW5035A
% Moisture: 8.85
Basis: Dry Weight
Parameter Cas Number Result RL MDL Units Analysis Date Flag Dil
Methylene Chloride
75-09-2
<0.00209
0.00967
0.00209
mg/kg
01.31.2020 16:50
U
MTBE
1634-04-4
<0.000670
0.00484
0.000670
mg/kg
01.31.2020 16:50
U
Naphthalene
91-20-3
0.00130
0.00967
0.00126
mg/kg
01.31.2020 16:50
J
n-Propylbenzene
103-65-1
<0.000757
0.00484
0.000757
mg/kg
01.31.2020 16:50
U
Styrene
100-42-5
<0.000718
0.00484
0.000718
mg/kg
01.31.2020 16:50
U
1, 1, 1,2-Tetrachloroethane
630-20-6
<0.000508
0.00484
0.000508
mg/kg
01.31.2020 16:50
U
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
79-34-5
<0.00115
0.00484
0.00115
mg/kg
01.31.2020 16:50
U
Tetrachloroethylene
127-18-4
<0.000145
0.00484
0.000145
mg/kg
01.31.2020 16:50
U
Toluene
108-88-3
<0.000569
0.00484
0.000569
mg/kg
01.31.2020 16:50
U
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene
87-61-6
<0.000555
0.00484
0.000555
mg/kg
01.31.2020 16:50
U
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
120-82-1
<0.000845
0.00484
0.000845
mg/kg
01.31.2020 16:50
U
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
79-00-5
<0.000648
0.00484
0.000648
mg/kg
01.31.2020 16:50
U
1, 1, 1 -Trichloroethane
71-55-6
<0.000728
0.00484
0.000728
mg/kg
01.31.2020 16:50
U
Trichloroethylene
79-01-6
<0.000684
0.00484
0.000684
mg/kg
01.31.2020 16:50
U
Trichlorofluoromethane
75-69-4
<0.00340
0.00484
0.00340
mg/kg
01.31.2020 16:50
U
1,2,3-Trichloropropane
96-18-4
<0.00160
0.00484
0.00160
mg/kg
01.31.2020 16:50
U
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene
95-63-6
<0.000697
0.00484
0.000697
mg/kg
01.31.2020 16:50
U
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene
108-67-8
<0.000788
0.00484
0.000788
mg/kg
01.31.2020 16:50
U
Vinyl Chloride
75-01-4
<0.00194
0.00967
0.00194
mg/kg
01.31.2020 16:50
U
o-Xylene
95-47-6
<0.000693
0.00484
0.000693
mg/kg
01.31.2020 16:50
U
m,p-Xylenes
179601-23-1
<0.00117
0.00967
0.00117
mg/kg
01.31.2020 16:50
U
Total Xylenes
1330-20-7
<0.000693
0.00484
0.000693
mg/kg
01.31.2020 16:50
U
Surrogate
Cas Number
% Recovery
Units
Limits
Analysis Date
Flag
1,2-Dichloroethane-D4
17060-07-0
120
%
53-159
01.31.2020 16:50
Toluene-D8
2037-26-5
100
%
70-130
01.31.2020 16:50
4-Bromofluorobenzene
460-00-4
92
%
30-180
01.31.2020 16:50
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Page 16 of 60 Final 1.000

xEnicv
LAQORATORIES
Certificate of Analytical Results 650957
WithersRavenel, Cary, NC
520 Judson Church Rd
Sample Id: TW-1 Matrix: Soil Date Received: 0 1.3 1.2020 08:48
Lab Sample Id: 650957-003 Date Collected: 01.30.2020 11:00
Analytical Method: Pb, Cr by SW846 6010C Prep Method: SW3010A
Tech: MLI % Moisture:
Analyst: DEP Date Prep: 02.05.2020 09:20
Seq Number: 3115744 SUB: E871002
Parameter Cas Number Result RL MDL Units Analysis Date Flag Dil
Chromium 7440-47-3 0.0142 0.0100 0.000811 mg/L 02.05.202019:39 1
Lead 7439-92-1 0.00740 0.0150 0.00237 mg/L 02.05.202019:39 1
Page 17 of 60 Final 1.000

xEnicv
L AQORATORIES
Certificate of Analytical Results 650957
WithersRavenel, Cary, NC
520 Judson Church Rd
Sample Id: TW-2 Matrix: Soil Date Received: 0 1.3 1.2020 08:48
Lab Sample Id: 650957-004 Date Collected: 01.30.2020 11:47
Analytical Method: Pb, Cr by SW846 6010C Prep Method: SW3010A
Tech: MLI % Moisture:
Analyst: DEP Date Prep: 02.05.2020 09:20
Seq Number: 3115744 SUB: E871002
Parameter Cas Number Result RL NIDL Units Analysis Date Flag Dil
Chromium
7440-47-3 0.00930
0.0100
0.000811
mg/L
02.05.202019:43
1
Lead
7439-92-1 0.00275
0.0150
0.00237
mg/L
02.05.202019:43
1
Analytical Method: EPH by MADEP Method
Prep Method: SW3510C
Tech: IMM
% Moisture:
Analyst: AEM
Date Prep:
02.06.2020 13:40
Seq Number: 3116135
Parameter
Cas Number Result
RL
NIDL
Units
Analysis Date
Flag
Dil
C9 to C18 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons
ALHYDRC9Cll <128
255
128
ug/L
02.10.2020 03:35
U
1
C19 to C36Aliphatic Hydrocarbons
ALHYDRCI9C: <170
340
170
ug/L
02.10.2020 03:35
U
1
C11 to C22 Aromatics
Cl lC22 <181
362
181
ug/L
02.10.2020 06:59
U
1
Surrogate
Cas Number % Recovery
Units
Limits
Analysis Date
Flag
1-Chlorooctadecane
3386-33-2
32
%
40-140
02.10.2020 03:35
**
o-Terphenyl
84-15-1
67
%
40-140
02.10.2020 06:59
2-Fluorobiphenyl
321-60-8
75
%
40-140
02.10.2020 06:59
Page 18 of 60 Final 1.000

xEnicv
l AQORATORIES
Certificate of Analytical Results 650957
Sample Id: TW-2
Lab Sample Id: 650957-004
Analytical Method: SVOCs by SW-846 8270D
Tech: GEP
Analyst: CLAR
Seq Number: 3115927
WithersRavenel, Cary, NC
520 Judson Church Rd
Matrix: Soil
Date Collected: 01.30.2020 11:47
Date Prep: 02.04.2020 14:34
Date Received: 0 1.3 1.2020 08:48
Prep Method: SW3510C
% Moisture:
Parameter
Cas Number
Result
RL
MDL
Units
Analysis Date
Flag
Dil
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
120-82-1
<1.35
10.0
1.35
ug/L
02.06.2020 23:44
U
1
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
95-50-1
<1.36
10.0
1.36
ug/L
02.06.2020 23:44
U
1
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
541-73-1
<1.23
10.0
1.23
ug/L
02.06.2020 23:44
U
1
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
106-46-7
<1.23
10.0
1.23
ug/L
02.06.2020 23:44
U
1
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
95-95-4
<0.560
10.0
0.560
ug/L
02.06.2020 23:44
U
1
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
88-06-2
<1.47
10.0
1.47
ug/L
02.06.2020 23:44
U
1
2,4-Dichlorophenol
120-83-2
<1.44
10.0
1.44
ug/L
02.06.2020 23:44
U
1
2,4-Dimethylphenol
105-67-9
<1.63
10.0
1.63
ug/L
02.06.2020 23:44
U
I
2,4-Dinitrophenol
51-28-5
<1.93
10.0
1.93
ug/L
02.06.2020 23:44
U
I
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
121-14-2
<1.51
10.0
1.51
ug/L
02.06.2020 23:44
U
1
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
606-20-2
<1.28
10.0
1.28
ug/L
02.06.2020 23:44
U
I
2-Chloronaphthalene
91-58-7
<1.29
10.0
1.29
ug/L
02.06.2020 23:44
U
1
2-Chlorophenol
95-57-8
<1.35
10.0
1.35
ug/L
02.06.2020 23:44
U
1
2-Methylnaphthalene
91-57-6
<1.26
10.0
1.26
ug/L
02.06.2020 23:44
U
I
2-methylphenol
95-48-7
<1.30
10.0
1.30
ug/L
02.06.2020 23:44
U
I
2-Nitroaniline
88-74-4
<1.71
10.0
1.71
ug/L
02.06.2020 23:44
U
I
2-Nitrophenol
88-75-5
<1.51
10.0
1.51
ug/L
02.06.2020 23:44
U
1
3&4-Methylphenol
15831-10-4
<1.63
10.0
1.63
ug/L
02.06.2020 23:44
U
1
3,3-Dichlorobenzidine
91-94-1
<1.22
10.0
1.22
ug/L
02.06.2020 23:44
U
1
3-Nitroaniline
99-09-2
<1.71
10.0
1.71
ug/L
02.06.2020 23:44
U
1
4,6-dinitro-2-methyl phenol
534-52-1
<1.51
10.0
1.51
ug/L
02.06.2020 23:44
U
I
4-Bromophenyl-phenylether
101-55-3
<1.30
10.0
1.30
ug/L
02.06.2020 23:44
U
I
4-chloro-3-methylphenol
59-50-7
<1.14
10.0
1.14
ug/L
02.06.2020 23:44
U
I
4-Chloroaniline
106-47-8
<1.70
10.0
1.70
ug/L
02.06.2020 23:44
U
I
4-Chlorophenyl Phenyl Ether
7005-72-3
<1.14
10.0
1.14
ug/L
02.06.2020 23:44
U
1
4-Nitroaniline
100-01-6
<1.42
10.0
1.42
ug/L
02.06.2020 23:44
U
1
4-Nitrophenol
100-02-7
<1.82
10.0
1.82
ug/L
02.06.2020 23:44
U
1
Acenaphthene
83-32-9
<1.18
10.0
1.18
ug/L
02.06.2020 23:44
U
I
Acenaphthylene
208-96-8
<1.18
10.0
1.18
ug/L
02.06.2020 23:44
U
I
Aniline (Phenylamine, Aminobenzene)
62-53-3
<1.10
10.0
1.10
ug/L
02.06.2020 23:44
U
1
Anthracene
120-12-7
<1.45
10.0
1.45
ug/L
02.06.2020 23:44
U
1
Benzo(a)anthracene
56-55-3
<1.46
10.0
1.46
ug/L
02.06.2020 23:44
U
1
Benzo(a)pyrene
50-32-8
<1.12
10.0
1.12
ug/L
02.06.2020 23:44
U
1
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
205-99-2
<0.920
10.0
0.920
ug/L
02.06.2020 23:44
U
I
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene
191-24-2
<0.970
10.0
0.970
ug/L
02.06.2020 23:44
U
I
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
207-08-9
<1.35
10.0
1.35
ug/L
02.06.2020 23:44
U
I
Benzoic Acid
65-85-0
<1.59
10.0
1.59
ug/L
02.06.2020 23:44
U
I
Benzyl Butyl Phthalate
85-68-7
<1.82
10.0
1.82
ug/L
02.06.2020 23:44
U
I
bis(2-chloroethoxy) methane
111-91-1
<1.25
10.0
1.25
ug/L
02.06.2020 23:44
U
1
Page 19 of 60 Final 1.000

xEnicv
l AQORATORIES
Certificate of Analytical Results 650957
Sample Id: TW-2
Lab Sample Id: 650957-004
Analytical Method: SVOCs by SW-846 8270D
Tech: GEP
Analyst: CLAR
Seq Number: 3115927
WithersRavenel, Cary, NC
520 Judson Church Rd
Matrix: Soil
Date Collected: 01.30.2020 11:47
Date Prep: 02.04.2020 14:34
Date Received: 0 1.3 1.2020 08:48
Prep Method: SW3510C
% Moisture:
Parameter Cas Number Result RL MDL Units Analysis Date Flag Dil
bis(2-chloroethyl) ether
111-44-4
<1.78
10.0
1.78
ug/L
02.06.2020 23:44
U
bis(2-chloroisopropyl) ether
39638-32-9
<1.24
10.0
1.24
ug/L
02.06.2020 23:44
U
bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate
117-81-7
<1.20
10.0
1.20
ug/L
02.06.2020 23:44
U
Chrysene
218-01-9
<l.l 1
10.0
1.11
ug/L
02.06.2020 23:44
U
Dibenz(a,h)anthracene
53-70-3
<1.03
10.0
1.03
ug/L
02.06.2020 23:44
U
Dibenzofuran
132-64-9
<1.24
10.0
1.24
ug/L
02.06.2020 23:44
U
Diethylphthalate
84-66-2
<1.38
10.0
1.38
ug/L
02.06.2020 23:44
U
Dimethyl Phthalate
131-11-3
<1.45
10.0
1.45
ug/L
02.06.2020 23:44
U
Di-n-butylphthalate
84-74-2
<1.52
10.0
1.52
ug/L
02.06.2020 23:44
U
di-n-Octyl Phthalate
117-84-0
<1.28
10.0
1.28
ug/L
02.06.2020 23:44
U
Fluoranthene
206-44-0
<1.41
10.0
1.41
ug/L
02.06.2020 23:44
U
Fluorene
86-73-7
<1.43
10.0
1.43
ug/L
02.06.2020 23:44
U
Hexachlorobenzene
118-74-1
<1.46
10.0
1.46
ug/L
02.06.2020 23:44
U
Hexachlorobutadiene
87-68-3
<1.12
10.0
1.12
ug/L
02.06.2020 23:44
U
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
77-47-4
<1.16
10.0
1.16
ug/L
02.06.2020 23:44
U
Hexachloroethane
67-72-1
<1.13
10.0
1.13
ug/L
02.06.2020 23:44
U
Indeno(1,2,3-c,d)Pyrene
193-39-5
<0.960
10.0
0.960
ug/L
02.06.2020 23:44
U
Isophorone
78-59-1
<1.67
10.0
1.67
ug/L
02.06.2020 23:44
U
Naphthalene
91-20-3
<1.25
10.0
1.25
ug/L
02.06.2020 23:44
U
Nitrobenzene
98-95-3
<1.28
10.0
1.28
ug/L
02.06.2020 23:44
U
N-Nitrosodi-n-Propylamine
621-64-7
<1.57
10.0
1.57
ug/L
02.06.2020 23:44
U
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine
86-30-6
<1.53
10.0
1.53
ug/L
02.06.2020 23:44
U
Pentachlorophenol
87-86-5
<1.35
10.0
1.35
ug/L
02.06.2020 23:44
U
Phenanthrene
85-01-8
<1.34
10.0
1.34
ug/L
02.06.2020 23:44
U
Phenol
108-95-2
<1.27
10.0
1.27
ug/L
02.06.2020 23:44
U
Pyrene
129-00-0
<1.22
10.0
1.22
ug/L
02.06.2020 23:44
U
Pyridine
110-86-1
<1.10
10.0
1.10
ug/L
02.06.2020 23:44
U
Surrogate
Cas Number
% Recovery
Units
Limits
Analysis Date
Flag
2-Fluorophenol
367-12-4
54
%
30-105
02.06.2020 23:44
Nitrobenzene-d5
4165-60-0
79
%
46-111
02.06.2020 23:44
2-Fluorobiphenyl
321-60-8
78
%
44-117
02.06.2020 23:44
2,4,6-Tribromophenol
118-79-6
95
%
48-117
02.06.2020 23:44
Terphenyl-1314
1718-51-0
57
%
46-126
02.06.2020 23:44
Phenol-d5
4165-62-2
49
%
35-105
02.06.2020 23:44
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Page 20 of 60 Final 1.000

xEnicv
l AQORATORIES
Certificate of Analytical Results 650957
Sample Id: TW-2
Lab Sample Id: 650957-004
Analytical Method: VOCs by SW-846 8260B
Tech: JNL
Analyst: JNL
Seq Number: 3115557
WithersRavenel, Cary, NC
520 Judson Church Rd
Matrix: Soil
Date Collected: 01.30.2020 11:47
Date Prep: 02.04.2020 08:00
Date Received: 0 1.3 1.2020 08:48
Prep Method: SW5030B
% Moisture:
Parameter
Cas Number
Result
RI,
MDL
Units
Analysis Date
Flag
Dil
Benzene
71-43-2
<0.160
1.00
0.160
ug/L
02.04.2020 14:04
U
1
Bromobenzene
108-86-1
<0.210
1.00
0.210
ug/L
02.04.2020 14:04
U
1
Bromochloromethane
74-97-5
<0.200
1.00
0.200
ug/L
02.04.2020 14:04
U
1
Bromodichloromethane
75-27-4
<0.250
1.00
0.250
ug/L,
02.04.2020 14:04
U
1
Bromoform
75-25-2
<0.170
1.00
0.170
ug/L
02.04.2020 14:04
U
1
Methyl bromide
74-83-9
1.94
1.00
0.250
ug/L
02.04.2020 14:04
1
n-Butylbenzene
104-51-8
<0.170
1.00
0.170
ug/L
02.04.2020 14:04
U
1
Sec-Butylbenzene
135-98-8
<0.210
1.00
0.210
ug/L
02.04.2020 14:04
U
1
tert-Butylbenzene
98-06-6
<0.180
1.00
0.180
ug/L
02.04.2020 14:04
U
1
Carbon Tetrachloride
56-23-5
<0.330
1.00
0.330
ug/L
02.04.2020 14:04
U
1
Chlorobenzene
108-90-7
<0.150
1.00
0.150
ug/L
02.04.2020 14:04
U
1
Chloroethane
75-00-3
<0.250
1.00
0.250
ug/L
02.04.2020 14:04
U
1
Chloroform
67-66-3
<0.160
1.00
0.160
ug/L
02.04.2020 14:04
U
1
Methyl Chloride
74-87-3
176
5.00
1.25
ug/L
02.06.2020 10:47
D
5
2-Chlorotoluene
95-49-8
<0.190
1.00
0.190
ug/L
02.04.2020 14:04
U
I
4-Chlorotoluene
106-43-4
<0.130
1.00
0.130
ug/L
02.04.2020 14:04
U
I
p-Cymene (p-Isopropyltoluene)
99-87-6
<0.130
1.00
0.130
ug/L,
02.04.2020 14:04
U
1
Dibromochloromethane
124-48-1
<0.150
1.00
0.150
ug/L,
02.04.2020 14:04
U
1
1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane
96-12-8
<0.190
1.00
0.190
ug/L
02.04.2020 14:04
U
1
1,2-Dibromoethane
106-93-4
<0.180
1.00
0.180
ug/L
02.04.2020 14:04
U
1
Methylene Bromide
74-95-3
<0.600
5.00
0.600
ug/L
02.04.2020 14:04
U
1
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
95-50-1
<0.140
1.00
0.140
ug/L
02.04.2020 14:04
U
1
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
541-73-1
<0.170
1.00
0.170
ug/L
02.04.2020 14:04
U
1
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
106-46-7
<0.170
1.00
0.170
ug/L
02.04.2020 14:04
U
1
Dichlorodifluoromethane
75-71-8
<0.220
1.00
0.220
ug/L
02.04.2020 14:04
U
1
1, 1 -Dichloroethane
75-34-3
<0.110
1.00
0.110
ug/L
02.04.2020 14:04
U
1
1,2-Dichloroethane
107-06-2
<0.180
1.00
0.180
ug/L
02.04.2020 14:04
U
1
1,1-Dichloroethee
75-35-4
<0.200
1.00
0.200
ug/L
02.04.2020 14:04
U
I
cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene
156-59-2
<0.210
1.00
0.210
ug/L
02.04.2020 14:04
U
I
trans-1,2-dichloroethylene
156-60-5
<0.210
1.00
0.210
ug/L
02.04.2020 14:04
U
1
1,2-Dichloropropane
78-87-5
<0.150
1.00
0.150
ug/L,
02.04.2020 14:04
U
1
1,3-Dichloropropane
142-28-9
<0.190
1.00
0.190
ug/L
02.04.2020 14:04
U
1
2,2-Dichloropropane
594-20-7
<0.210
1.00
0.210
ug/L
02.04.2020 14:04
U
1
1, 1 -Dichloropropene
563-58-6
<0.100
1.00
0.100
ug/L
02.04.2020 14:04
U
1
cis- 1,3 -Dichloropropene
10061-01-5
<0.100
1.00
0.100
ug/L
02.04.2020 14:04
U
1
trans- l,3-dichloropropene
10061-02-6
<0.110
1.00
0.110
ug/L
02.04.2020 14:04
U
1
Ethylbenzene
100-41-4
<0.190
1.00
0.190
ug/L
02.04.2020 14:04
U
1
Hexachlorobutadiene
87-68-3
<1.00
5.00
1.00
ug/L
02.04.2020 14:04
U
1
Isopropylbenzene
98-82-8
<0.150
1.00
0.150
ug/L
02.04.2020 14:04
U
1
Page 21 of 60 Final 1.000

xEnicv
l AQORATORIES
Certificate of Analytical Results 650957
Sample Id: TW-2
Lab Sample Id: 650957-004
Analytical Method: VOCs by SW-846 8260B
Tech: JNL
Analyst: JNL
Seq Number: 3115557
WithersRavenel, Cary, NC
520 Judson Church Rd
Matrix: Soil
Date Collected: 01.30.2020 11:47
Date Prep: 02.04.2020 08:00
Date Received: 0 1.3 1.2020 08:48
Prep Method: SW5030B
% Moisture:
Parameter Cas Number Result RI, MDL Units Analysis Date Flag Dil
Methylene Chloride
75-09-2
<0.420
1.00
0.420
ug/L
02.04.2020 14:04
U
MTBE
1634-04-4
<0.180
2.00
0.180
ug/L
02.04.2020 14:04
U
Naphthalene
91-20-3
<0.220
1.00
0.220
ug/L
02.04.2020 14:04
U
n-Propylbenzene
103-65-1
<0.180
1.00
0.180
ug/L
02.04.2020 14:04
U
Styrene
100-42-5
<0.180
1.00
0.180
ug/L
02.04.2020 14:04
U
1, 1, 1,2-Tetrachloroethane
630-20-6
<0.240
1.00
0.240
ug/L
02.04.2020 14:04
U
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
79-34-5
<0.180
1.00
0.180
ug/L
02.04.2020 14:04
U
Tetrachloroethylene
127-18-4
21.7
1.00
0.160
ug/L
02.04.2020 14:04
Toluene
108-88-3
<0.140
1.00
0.140
ug/L
02.04.2020 14:04
U
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene
87-61-6
<0.250
1.00
0.250
ug/L
02.04.2020 14:04
U
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
120-82-1
<0.170
1.00
0.170
ug/L
02.04.2020 14:04
U
1, 1, 1 -Trichloroethane
71-55-6
<0.160
1.00
0.160
ug/L
02.04.2020 14:04
U
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
79-00-5
<0.250
1.00
0.250
ug/L
02.04.2020 14:04
U
Trichloroethylene
79-01-6
<0.190
1.00
0.190
ug/L
02.04.2020 14:04
U
Trichlorofluoromethane
75-69-4
<0.530
1.00
0.530
ug/L
02.04.2020 14:04
U
1,2,3-Trichloropropane
96-18-4
<0.210
1.00
0.210
ug/L
02.04.2020 14:04
U
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene
95-63-6
<0.140
1.00
0.140
ug/L
02.04.2020 14:04
U
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene
108-67-8
<0.170
1.00
0.170
ug/L
02.04.2020 14:04
U
o-Xylene
95-47-6
<0.200
1.00
0.200
ug/L
02.04.2020 14:04
U
m,p-Xylenes
179601-23-1
<0.510
2.00
0.510
ug/L
02.04.2020 14:04
U
Vinyl Chloride
75-01-4
<0.190
1.00
0.190
ug/L
02.04.2020 14:04
U
Total Xylenes
1330-20-7
<0.200
1.00
0.200
ug/L
02.04.2020 14:04
U
Surrogate
Cas Number
% Recovery
Units
Limits
Analysis Date
Flag
1,2-Dichloroethane-D4
17060-07-0
103
%
53-159
02.04.2020 14:04
Toluene-138
2037-26-5
98
%
70-130
02.04.2020 14:04
4-Bromofluorobenzene
460-00-4
ill
%
30-180
02.04.2020 14:04
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Page 22 of 60 Final 1.000

xEnicv
LAQORATORIES
Certificate of Analytical Results 650957
WithersRavenel, Cary, NC
520 Judson Church Rd
Sample Id: SB-1 2.5' Matrix: Soil Date Received: 0 1.3 1.2020 08:48
Lab Sample Id: 650957-005 Date Collected: 01.30.2020 10:30
Analytical Method: Pb, Cr by SW846 6010C Prep Method: SW3051
Tech: PJB % Moisture: 3.88
Analyst: DEP Date Prep: 02.05.2020 10:45 Basis: Dry Weight
Seq Number: 3115742 SUB: E871002
Parameter Cas Number Result RL MDL Units Analysis Date Flag Dil
Chromium 7440-47-3 3.21 0.963 0.0678 mg/kg 02.05.202017:33 1
Lead 7439-92-1 1.58 1.93 0.458 mg/kg 02.05.202017:33 J 1
Page 23 of 60 Final 1.000

4qNr
X E N C O CHRONOLOGY OF HOLDING TIMES
LABORATURIES
Analytical Method: EPH by MADEP Method
Work Order #: 650957
Date Received: 01.31.2020
Client : WithersRavenel
Project ID: 03200022
Max
Time
Max
Time
Date Date Holding
Held Date
Holding
Held
Field Sample ID Lab Sample ID Collected Extracted Time
Extracted Analyzed
Time
Analyzed Q
Extracted
(Days)
Analyzed
(Days)
(Days)
(Days)
SB-3 2.5'
650957-001
01.30.2020
01.31.2020
14
1
02.04.2020
40 4
SB-3 2.5'
650957-001
01.30.2020
01.31.2020
14
1
02.05.2020
40 5
SB-3 5.0'
650957-002
01.30.2020
01.31.2020
14
1
02.04.2020
40 4
SB-3 5.0'
650957-002
01.30.2020
01.31.2020
14
1
02.05.2020
40 5
Tw-2
650957-004
01.30.2020
02.06.2020
14
7
02.10.2020
40 4
Tw-2
650957-004
01.30.2020
02.06.2020
14
7
02.10.2020
40 4
F = These samples were analyzed outside the recommended holding time.
Page 24 of 60 Final 1.000

X E N C O CHRONOLOGY OF HOLDING TIMES
LAF3❑BAT❑RIES
Analytical Method: Percent Moisture by SM2540C
Work Order #: 650957
Date Received: 01.31.2020
Client : WithersRavenel
Project ID: 03200022
Max
Time
Max
Time
Date Date Holding
Held Date
Holding
Held
Field Sample ID Lab Sample ID Collected Extracted Time
Extracted Analyzed
Time
Analyzed Q
Extracted
(Days)
Analyzed
(Days)
(Days)
(Days)
sB-3 2.5'
650957-001
01.30.2020
01.31.2020
180 1
sB-3 5.0'
650957-002
01.30.2020
01.31.2020
180 1
sB-12.5'
650957-005
01.30.2020
01.31.2020
180 1
F = These samples were analyzed outside the recommended holding time.
Page 25 of 60 Final 1.000

4qNr
X E N C O CHRONOLOGY OF HOLDING TIMES
LA6❑RAT❑RIES
Analytical Method: Pb, Cr by SW846 6010C
Work Order #: 650957
Date Received: 01.31.2020
Client : WithersRavenel
Project ID: 03200022
Max
Time
Max
Time
Date Date Holding
Held Date
Holding
Held
Field Sample ID Lab Sample ID Collected Extracted Time
Extracted Analyzed
Time
Analyzed Q
Extracted
(Days)
Analyzed
(Days)
(Days)
(Days)
SB-3 2.5'
650957-001
01.30.2020
02.05.2020
180
6
02.05.2020
180 0
SB-3 5.0'
650957-002
01.30.2020
02.05.2020
180
6
02.05.2020
180 0
TW-1
650957-003
01.30.2020
02.05.2020
180
6
02.05.2020
180 0
TW-2
650957-004
01.30.2020
02.05.2020
180
6
02.05.2020
180 0
SB-12.5'
650957-005
01.30.2020
02.05.2020
180
6
02.05.2020
180 0
F = These samples were analyzed outside the recommended holding time.
Page 26 of 60 Final 1.000

X E N C O CHRONOLOGY OF HOLDING TIMES
LA6❑RAT❑RIES
Analytical Method: VOCs by SW-846 8260B
Work Order #: 650957
Date Received: 01.31.2020
Client : WithersRavenel
Project ID: 03200022
Max
Time
Max
Time
Date Date Holding
Held Date
Holding
Held
Field Sample ID Lab Sample ID Collected Extracted Time
Extracted Analyzed
Time
Analyzed Q
Extracted
(Days)
Analyzed
(Days)
(Days)
(Days)
SB-3 2.5'
650957-001
01.30.2020
01.31.2020
14 1
SB-3 5.0'
650957-002
01.30.2020
01.31.2020
14 1
Tw-2
650957-004
01.30.2020
02.04.2020
14 5
F = These samples were analyzed outside the recommended holding time.
Page 27 of 60 Final 1.000

4qNr
X E N C O CHRONOLOGY OF HOLDING TIMES
LAF3❑RAT❑RIES
Analytical Method: SVOCs by SW-846 8270D
Work Order #: 650957
Date Received: 01.31.2020
Client : WithersRavenel
Project ID: 03200022
Max
Time
Max
Time
Date Date Holding
Held Date
Holding
Held
Field Sample ID Lab Sample ID Collected Extracted Time
Extracted Analyzed
Time
Analyzed Q
Extracted
(Days)
Analyzed
(Days)
(Days)
(Days)
SB-3 2.5' 650957-001 01.30.2020 02.05.2020 14 6 02.07.2020 40 2
SB-3 5.0' 650957-002 01.30.2020 02.05.2020 14 6 02.07.2020 40 2
Tw-2 650957-004 01.30.2020 02.04.2020 7 5 02.06.2020 40 2
F = These samples were analyzed outside the recommended holding time.
Page 28 of 60 Final 1.000

xEnicv
LAF30RATORIE5
Flagging Criteria
X In our quality control review of the data a QC deficiency was observed and flagged as noted. MS/MSD recoveries were found to be
outside of the laboratory control limits due to possible matrix /chemical interference, or a concentration of target analyte high enough
to affect the recovery of the spike concentration. This condition could also affect the relative percent difference in the MS/MSD.
B A target analyte or common laboratory contaminant was identified in the method blank. Its presence indicates possible field or
laboratory contamination.
D The sample(s) were diluted due to targets detected over the highest point of the calibration curve, or due to matrix interference.
Dilution factors are included in the final results. The result is from a diluted sample.
E The data exceeds the upper calibration limit; therefore, the concentration is reported as estimated.
F RPD exceeded lab control limits.
J The target analyte was positively identified below the quantitation limit and above the detection limit.
U Analyte was not detected.
L The LCS data for this analytical batch was reported below the laboratory control limits for this analyte. The department supervisor and
QA Director reviewed data. The samples were either reanalyzed or flagged as estimated concentrations.
H The LCS data for this analytical batch was reported above the laboratory control limits. Supporting QC Data were reviewed by the
Department Supervisor and QA Director. Data were determined to be valid for reporting.
K Sample analyzed outside of recommended hold time.
JN A combination of the "N" and the " Y qualifier. The analysis indicates that the analyte is "tentatively identified" and the associated
numerical value may not be consistent with the amount actually present in the environmental sample.
** Surrogate recovered outside laboratory control limit.
BRL Below Reporting Limit. ND Not Detected.
RL Reporting Limit
MDL Method Detection Limit SDL Sample Detection Limit LOD Limit of Detection
PQL Practical Quantitation Limit MQL Method Quantitation Limit LOQ Limit of Quantitation
DL Method Detection Limit
NC Non -Calculable
SMP Client Sample
BLK Method Blank
BKS/LCS Blank Spike/Laboratory Control Sample BKSD/LCSD Blank Spike Duplicate/Laboratory Control Sample Duplicate
MD/SD Method Duplicate/Sample Duplicate MS Matrix Spike
+ NELAC certification not offered for this compound.
* (Next to analyte name or method description) = Outside XENCO's scope of NELAC accreditation
MSD: Matrix Spike Duplicate
Page 29 of 60 Final 1.000

xEnicv
LAF30RATORIES
QC Summary 650957
Analytical Method: Percent Moisture by SM2540G
Seq Number: 3115131
Parent Sample Id: 650957-005
Parent
Parameter Result
Percent Moisture 3.88
Analytical Method: Pb, Cr by SW846 6010C
Seq Number: 3115744
MB Sample Id: 7696017-1-BLK
Parameter MB Spike
Result Amount
Chromium <0.000811 1.00
Lead <0.00237 1.00
Analytical Method: Pb, Cr by SW846 6010C
Seq Number: 3115742
MB Sample Id: 7696044-1-BLK
Parameter MB Spike
Result Amount
Chromium <0.0704 100
Lead <0.476 100
Analytical Method: Pb, Cr by SW846 6010C
Seq Number: 3115744
Parent Sample Id: 651017-009
Parameter Parent Spike
Result Amount
Chromium 0.0209 1.00
Lead <0.00237 1.00
Analytical Method: Pb, Cr by SW846 6010C
Seq Number: 3115742
Parent Sample Id: 650957-001
Parameter Parent Spike
Result Amount
Chromium 7.04 105
Lead 4.79 105
WithersRavenel
520 Judson Church Rd
Matrix: Soil
MD Sample Id: 650957-005 D
MD
Result
3.85
%RPD RPD Units Analysis Flag
Limit Date
1 10 % 01.31.202012:00
Prep Method: SW3010A
Matrix:
Water
Date Prep: 02.05.2020
LCS Sample
Id:
7696017-1-BKS
LCSD Sample Id: 7696017-1-BSD
LCS
LCS
LCSD
LCSD
Limits
%RPD RPD Units Analysis
Flag
Result
%Rec
Result
%Rec
Limit Date
1.04
104
1.01
101
75-125
3 20 mg/L 02.05.202018:44
1.03
103
1.00
100
75-125
3 20 mg/L 02.05.202018:44
Prep Method: SW3051
Matrix:
Solid
Date Prep: 02.05.2020
LCS Sample
Id:
7696044-1-BKS
LCSD Sample Id: 7696044-1-BSD
LCS
LCS
LCSD
LCSD
Limits
%RPD RPD Units Analysis
Flag
Result
%Rec
Result
%Rec
Limit Date
102
102
101
101
75-125
1 20 mg/kg 02.05.202016:52
102
102
102
102
75-125
0 20 mg/kg 02.05.202016:52
Prep Method: SW3010A
Matrix:
Ground Water
Date Prep: 02.05.2020
MS Sample
Id:
651017-009 S
MSD Sample Id: 651017-009 SD
MS
MS
MSD
MSD
Limits
%RPD RPD Units Analysis
Flag
Result
%Rec
Result
%Rec
Limit Date
1.10
108
1.10
108
75-125
0 20 mg/L 02.05.202018:57
1.07
107
1.06
106
75-125
1 20 mg/L 02.05.202018:57
Prep Method: SW3051
Matrix:
Soil
Date Prep: 02.05.2020
MS Sample
Id:
650957-001 S
MSD Sample Id: 650957-001 SD
MS
MS
MSD
MSD
Limits
%RPD RPD Units Analysis
Flag
Result
%Rec
Result
%Rec
Limit Date
116
104
111
103
75-125
4 20 mg/kg 02.05.202017:04
110
100
106
100
75-125
4 20 mg/kg 02.05.202017:04
MS/MSD Percent Recovery [D] = 100*(C-A) / B
Relative Percent Difference RPD = 200* I (C-E) / (C+E)
LCS/LCSD Recovery [D] = 100 * (C) / [B]
Log Difference Log Diff. = Log(Sample Duplicate) - Log(Original Sample)
Page 30 of 60
LCS = Laboratory Control Sample
A = Parent Result
C = MS/LCS Result
E = MSD/LCSD Result
Final 1.000
MS = Matrix Spike
B = Spike Added
D = MSD/LCSD % Rec

xEnicv
LAF30RATORIE�
QC Summary 650957
WithersRavenel
520 Judson Church Rd
Analytical Method: EPH by MADEP Method
Prep Method: SW3550
Seq Number: 3115560
Matrix:
Solid
Date Prep:
01.31.2020
MB Sample Id: 7695702-1-BLK
LCS Sample Id:
7695702-1-BKS
LCSD Sample Id: 7695702-1-BSD
Parameter
MB Spike
LCS LCS
LCSD
LCSD
Limits
%RPD RPD
Units Analysis Fla g
Result Amount
Result %Rec
Result
%Rec
Limit
Date
C9 to C18 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons
<6.00 30.0
14.8 49
11.7
39
40-140
23 25
mg/kg 02.04.2020 09:40 L
C19 to C36Aliphatic Hydrocarbons
<8.00 40.0
26.7 67
26.4
66
40-140
1 25
mg/kg 02.04.2020 09:40
C11 to C22 Aromatics
<8.50 85.0
64.5 76
60.0
71
40-140
7 25
mg/kg 02.05.2020 01:32
Surrogate
MB MB
LCS
LCS
LCSD
LCSD
Limits
Units Analysis
%Rec Flag
%Rec
Flag
%Rec
Flag
Date
1-Chlorooctadecane
69
67
64
40-140
% 02.04.2020 09:40
o-Terphenyl
78
74
68
40-140
% 02.05.2020 01:32
2-Fluorobiphenyl
87
84
83
40-140
% 02.05.2020 01:32
Analytical Method: EPH by MADEP Method
Prep Method:
SW3510C
Seq Number: 3116135
Matrix:
Water
Date Prep:
02.06.2020
MB Sample Id: 7696138-1-BLK
LCS Sample Id:
7696138-1-BKS
LCSD Sample Id: 7696138-1-BSD
Parameter
MB Spike
LCS LCS
LCSD
LCSD
Limits
%RPD RPD
Units Analysis Fla g
Result Amount
Result %Rec
Result
%Rec
Limit
Date
C9 to C18 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons
<60.0 300
157 52
155
52
40-140
1 25
ug/L 02.10.2020 02:26
C19 to C36Aliphatic Hydrocarbons
<80.0 400
253 63
245
61
40-140
3 25
ug/L 02.10.2020 02:26
C11 to C22 Aromatics
<85.0 850
664 78
616
72
40-140
8 25
ug/L 02.10.2020 05:52
Surrogate
MB MB
LCS
LCS
LCSD
LCSD
Limits
Units Analysis
%Rec Flag
%Rec
Flag
%Rec
Flag
Date
I-Chlorooctadecane
42
41
40
40-140
% 02.10.2020 02:26
o-Terphenyl
65
71
67
40-140
% 02.10.2020 05:52
2-Fluorobiphenyl
71
77
73
40-140
% 02.10.2020 05:52
MS/MSD Percent Recovery
[D] = 100*(C-A) / B
LCS
= Laboratory Control Sample
MS = Matrix Spike
Relative Percent Difference
RPD = 200* I (C-E) / (C+E)
A
= Parent Result
B = Spike Added
LCS/LCSD Recovery
[D] = 100 * (C) / [B]
C
= MS/LCS Result
D = MSD/LCSD % Rec
Log Difference
Log Diff. = Log(Sample Duplicate)
- Log(Original Sample)
E
= MSD/LCSD Result
Page 31
of 60
Final 1.000

QC Summary 650957
XENCD
X
AF30 yORIES
Analytical Method:
Seq Number:
MB Sample Id:
Parameter
SVOCs by SW-846 8270D
3115927
7695932-1-BLK
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
2,4-Dichlorophenol
2,4-Dimethylphenol
2,4-Dinitrophenol
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
2-Chloronaphthalene
2-Chlorophenol
2-Methylnaphthalene
2-methylphenol
2-Nitroaniline
2-Nitrophenol
3&4-Methylphenol
3-Nitroaniline
4,6-dinitro-2-methyl phenol
4-Bromophenyl-phenylether
4-chloro-3-methylphenol
4-Chloroaniline
4-Chlorophenyl Phenyl Ether
4-Nitroaniline
4-Nitrophenol
Acenaphthene
Acenaphthylene
Aniline (Phenylamine, Aminobenzene)
Anthracene
Benzo(a)anthracene
Benzo(a)pyrene
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
Benzyl Butyl Phthalate
bis(2-chloroethoxy) methane
bis(2-chloroethyl) ether
bis(2-chloroisopropyl) ether
bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate
Chrysene
Dibenz(a,h)anthracene
Dibenzofuran
Diethylphthalate
Dimethyl Phthalate
Di-n-butylphthalate
di-n-Octyl Phthalate
Fluoranthene
Fluorene
Hexachlorobenzene
WithersRavenel
520 Judson Church Rd
Matrix: Water
LCS Sample Id: 7695932-1-BKS
MB
Spike
LCS
LCS
LCSD
LCSD
Result
Amount
Result
%Rec
Result
%Rec
<1.35
50.0
44.8
90
37.3
75
<1.36
50.0
45.5
91
37.4
75
<1.23
50.0
43.3
87
35.7
71
<1.23
50.0
43.7
87
35.8
72
<0.560
50.0
46.7
93
38.2
76
<1.47
50.0
46.1
92
37.2
74
<1.44
50.0
47.0
94
36.0
72
<1.63
50.0
41.0
82
31.6
63
<1.93
50.0
55.3
ill
43.4
87
<1.51
50.0
53.0
106
45.9
92
<1.28
50.0
50.5
101
43.2
86
<1.29
50.0
40.3
81
34.0
68
<1.35
50.0
41.1
82
30.2
60
<1.26
50.0
47.6
95
40.3
81
<1.30
50.0
39.4
79
28.9
58
<1.71
50.0
50.7
101
43.3
87
<1.51
50.0
47.3
95
35.7
71
<1.63
50.0
40.2
80
28.9
58
<1.71
50.0
37.5
75
31.9
64
<1.51
50.0
51.2
102
40.7
81
<1.30
50.0
49.9
100
43.4
87
<1.14
50.0
47.4
95
37.3
75
<1.70
50.0
37.4
75
31.2
62
<1.14
50.0
48.3
97
41.8
84
<1.42
50.0
40.4
81
34.4
69
<1.82
50.0
36.9
74
29.1
58
<1.18
50.0
45.0
90
38.5
77
<1.18
50.0
43.2
86
36.7
73
<1.10
50.0
24.3
49
20.6
41
<1.45
50.0
46.4
93
40.7
81
<1.46
50.0
45.4
91
38.9
78
<1.12
50.0
51.6
103
44.2
88
<0.920
50.0
49.7
99
42.8
86
<0.970
50.0
53.4
107
46.1
92
<1.35
50.0
56.5
113
49.3
99
<1.82
50.0
44.9
90
39.3
79
<1.25
50.0
46.5
93
38.2
76
<1.78
50.0
45.8
92
36.3
73
<1.24
50.0
46.6
93
38.0
76
<1.20
50.0
44.5
89
38.9
78
<1.11
50.0
46.5
93
39.9
80
<1.03
50.0
53.8
108
46.5
93
<1.24
50.0
47.5
95
40.7
81
<1.38
50.0
48.5
97
41.3
83
<1.45
50.0
45.8
92
36.7
73
<1.52
50.0
50.2
100
43.9
88
<1.28
50.0
45.6
91
39.2
78
<1.41
50.0
50.6
101
44.8
90
<1.43
50.0
47.4
95
40.8
82
<1.46
50.0
49.0
98
42.5
85
Prep Method:
SW3510C
Date Prep:
02.04.2020
LCSD Sample Id: 7695932-1-BSD
Limits
%RPD
RPD
Units
Analysis
Limit
Date
34-117
18
30
ug/L
02.10.202014:53
38-111
20
30
ug/L
02.10.202014:53
38-111
19
30
ug/L
02.10.202014:53
37-111
20
30
ug/L
02.10.202014:53
39-125
20
30
ug/L
02.10.202014:53
42-125
21
30
ug/L
02.10.202014:53
38-120
27
30
ug/L
02.10.202014:53
39-117
26
30
ug/L
02.10.202014:53
13-152
24
30
ug/L
02.10.202014:53
41-128
14
30
ug/L
02.10.202014:53
42-127
16
30
ug/L
02.10.202014:53
40-118
17
30
ug/L
02.10.202014:53
41-108
31
30
ug/L
02.10.202014:53
37-112
17
30
ug/L
02.10.202014:53
36-105
31
30
ug/L
02.10.202014:53
34-121
16
30
ug/L
02.10.202014:53
38-125
28
30
ug/L
02.10.202014:53
35-106
33
30
ug/L
02.10.202014:53
42-123
16
30
ug/L
02.10.202014:53
12-157
23
30
ug/L
02.10.202014:53
40-126
14
30
ug/L
02.10.202014:53
40-119
24
30
ug/L
02.10.202014:53
39-111
18
30
ug/L
02.10.202014:53
40-122
14
30
ug/L
02.10.202014:53
42-125
16
30
ug/L
02.10.202014:53
14-102
24
30
ug/L
02.10.202014:53
41-116
16
30
ug/L
02.10.202014:53
41-118
16
30
ug/L
02.10.202014:53
31-105
16
30
ug/L
02.10.202014:53
39-127
13
30
ug/L
02.10.202014:53
40-129
15
30
ug/L
02.10.202014:53
36-141
15
30
ug/L
02.10.202014:53
34-139
15
30
ug/L
02.10.202014:53
32-141
15
30
ug/L
02.10.202014:53
31-139
14
30
ug/L
02.10.202014:53
44-133
13
30
ug/L
02.10.202014:53
36-113
20
30
ug/L
02.10.202014:53
38-111
23
30
ug/L
02.10.202014:53
32-110
20
30
ug/L
02.10.202014:53
44-136
13
30
ug/L
02.10.202014:53
41-124
15
30
ug/L
02.10.202014:53
35-143
15
30
ug/L
02.10.202014:53
41-119
15
30
ug/L
02.10.202014:53
41-125
16
30
ug/L
02.10.202014:53
42-123
22
30
ug/L
02.10.202014:53
41-133
13
30
ug/L
02.10.202014:53
34-145
15
30
ug/L
02.10.202014:53
38-132
12
30
ug/L
02.10.202014:53
41-121
15
30
ug/L
02.10.202014:53
39-128
14
30
ug/L
02.10.202014:53
MS/MSD Percent Recovery [D] = 100*(C-A) / B LCS = Laboratory Control Sample MS = Matrix Spike
Relative Percent Difference RPD = 200* I (C-E) / (C+E) A = Parent Result B = Spike Added
LCS/LCSD Recovery [D] = 100 * (C) / [B] C = MS/LCS Result D = MSD/LCSD % Rec
Log Difference Log Diff. = Log(Sample Duplicate) - Log(Original Sample) E = MSD/LCSD Result
Flag
F
F
F
Page 32 of 60
Final 1.000

QC Summary 650957
XENCD
X
AF30 yORIES
WithersRavenel
520 Judson Church Rd
Analytical Method: SVOCs by SW-846 8270D
Prep Method: SW3510C
Seq Number: 3115927
Matrix:
Water
Date Prep: 02.04.2020
MB Sample Id: 7695932-1-BLK
LCS Sample Id:
7695932-1-BKS
LCSD Sample Id: 7695932-1-BSD
Parameter
MB
Spike
LCS
LCS
LCSD
LCSD
Limits
%RPD
RPD
Units
Analysis
Result
Amount
Result
%Rec
Result
%Rec
Limit
Date
Hexachlorobutadiene
<1.12
50.0
43.2
86
34.6
69
39-120
22
30
ug/L
02.10.2020 14:53
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
<1.16
50.0
37.3
75
26.9
54
15-117
32
30
ug/L
02.10.2020 14:53
Hexachloroethane
<1.13
50.0
41.9
84
34.1
68
40-113
21
30
ug/L
02.10.2020 14:53
Indeno(1,2,3-c,d)Pyrene
<0.960
50.0
46.1
92
38.3
77
27-160
18
30
ug/L
02.10.2020 14:53
Isophorone
<1.67
50.0
46.1
92
38.0
76
40-115
19
30
ug/L
02.10.2020 14:53
Naphthalene
<1.25
50.0
44.7
89
37.5
75
37-113
18
30
ug/L
02.10.2020 14:53
Nitrobenzene
<1.28
50.0
45.9
92
37.8
76
37-114
19
30
ug/L
02.10.2020 14:53
N-Nitrosodi-n-Propylamine
<1.57
50.0
47.4
95
38.9
78
38-117
20
30
ug/L
02.10.2020 14:53
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine
<1.53
50.0
44.9
90
37.4
75
40-127
18
30
ug/L
02.10.2020 14:53
Pentachlorophenol
<1.35
50.0
50.6
101
44.2
88
10-107
14
30
ug/L
02.10.2020 14:53
Phenanthrene
<1.34
50.0
47.1
94
41.1
82
50-115
14
30
ug/L
02.10.2020 14:53
Phenol
<1.27
50.0
28.7
57
21.1
42
24-105
31
30
ug/L
02.10.2020 14:53
Pyrene
<1.22
50.0
44.4
89
38.3
77
23-152
15
30
ug/L
02.10.2020 14:53
Pyridine
<1.10
50.0
11.7
23
12.5
25
16-135
7
30
ug/L
02.10.2020 14:53
Surrogate
MB
MB
LCS
LCS
LCSD
LCSD
Limits
Units
Analysis
%Rec
Flag
%Rec
Flag
%Ree
Flag
Date
2-Fluorophenol
46
67
46
30-105
%
02.10.2020 14:53
Nitrobenzene-d5
84
92
73
46-111
%
02.10.2020 14:53
2-Fluorobiphenyl
78
86
69
44-117
%
02.10.2020 14:53
2,4,6-Tribromophenol
85
102
80
48-117
%
02.10.2020 14:53
Terphenyl-D14
78
87
69
46-126
%
02.10.2020 14:53
Phenol-d5
40
56
40
35-105
%
02.10.2020 14:53
MS/MSD Percent Recovery [D] = 100*(C-A) / B
Relative Percent Difference RPD = 200* I (C-E) / (C+E)
LCS/LCSD Recovery [D] = 100 * (C) / [B]
Log Difference Log Diff. = Log(Sample Duplicate) - Log(Original Sample)
LCS = Laboratory Control Sample
A = Parent Result
C = MS/LCS Result
E = MSD/LCSD Result
MS = Matrix Spike
B = Spike Added
D = MSD/LCSD % Rec
Flag
F
F
Page 33 of 60 Final 1.000

QC Summary 650957
XENCD
X
AF30 yORIES
Analytical Method:
Seq Number:
MB Sample Id:
Parameter
SVOCs by SW-846 8270D
3115923
7696030-1-BLK
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
1-Methylnaphthalene
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
2,4-Dichlorophenol
2,4-Dimethylphenol
2,4-Dinitrophenol
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
2-Chloronaphthalene
2-Chlorophenol
2-Methylnaphthalene
2-methylphenol
2-Nitroaniline
2-Nitrophenol
3&4-Methylphenol
3-Nitroaniline
4,6-dinitro-2-methyl phenol
4-Bromophenyl-phenylether
4-chloro-3-methylphenol
4-Chloroaniline
4-Chlorophenyl-phenyl ether
4-Nitroaniline
4-Nitrophenol
Acenaphthene
Acenaphthylene
Aniline (Phenylamine, Aminobenzene)
Anthracene
Benzo(a)anthracene
Benzo(a)pyrene
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
Benzyl Butyl Phthalate
bis(2-chloroethoxy) methane
bis(2-chloroethyl) ether
bis(2-chloroisopropyl) ether
bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate
Chrysene
Dibenz(a,h)Anthracene
Dibenzofuran
Diethyl Phthalate
Dimethyl Phthalate
di-n-Butyl Phthalate
di-n-Octyl Phthalate
Fluoranthene
Fluorene
WithersRavenel
520 Judson Church Rd
Matrix: Solid
LCS Sample Id: 7696030-1-BKS
MB
Spike
LCS
LCS
LCSD
LCSD
Result
Amount
Result
%Rec
Result
%Rec
<0.0654
1.67
1.25
75
1.23
74
<0.0599
1.67
1.21
72
1.17
70
<0.0584
1.67
1.15
69
1.13
68
<0.0410
1.67
1.16
69
1.13
68
<0.0726
1.67
1.22
73
1.20
72
<0.0681
1.67
1.31
78
1.33
80
<0.0714
1.67
1.29
77
1.28
77
<0.0470
1.67
1.32
79
1.31
78
<0.0673
1.67
1.23
74
1.24
74
<0.0596
1.67
1.22
73
1.32
79
<0.0596
1.67
1.43
86
1.46
87
<0.0481
1.67
1.36
81
1.37
82
<0.0673
1.67
1.03
62
1.03
62
<0.0662
1.67
1.20
72
1.18
71
<0.0566
1.67
1.22
73
1.22
73
<0.0518
1.67
1.26
75
1.21
72
<0.0518
1.67
1.33
80
1.37
82
<0.0467
1.67
1.30
78
1.32
79
<0.110
1.67
1.19
71
1.18
71
<0.0511
1.67
1.26
75
1.27
76
<0.0643
1.67
1.36
81
1.38
83
<0.0629
1.67
1.43
86
1.42
85
<0.0527
1.67
1.26
75
1.26
75
<0.0614
1.67
1.25
75
1.22
73
<0.0703
1.67
1.33
80
1.33
80
<0.0562
1.67
1.32
79
1.36
81
<0.0456
1.67
1.14
68
1.20
72
<0.0518
1.67
1.19
71
1.18
71
<0.0630
1.67
1.20
72
1.19
71
<0.0407
1.67
0.973
58
0.964
58
<0.0548
1.67
1.31
78
1.33
80
<0.0599
1.67
1.26
75
1.27
76
<0.0544
1.67
1.42
85
1.45
87
<0.0603
1.67
1.27
76
1.30
78
<0.0610
1.67
1.46
87
1.47
88
<0.0637
1.67
1.48
89
1.48
89
<0.0556
1.67
1.16
69
1.17
70
<0.0444
1.67
1.15
69
1.12
67
<0.0526
1.67
1.07
64
1.10
66
<0.0500
1.67
1.15
69
1.14
68
<0.0600
1.67
1.16
69
1.17
70
<0.0492
1.67
1.24
74
1.27
76
<0.0718
1.67
1.47
88
1.48
89
<0.0473
1.67
1.29
77
1.28
77
<0.0559
1.67
1.32
79
1.34
80
<0.0596
1.67
1.30
78
1.31
78
<0.0681
1.67
1.34
80
1.37
82
<0.0614
1.67
1.18
71
1.20
72
<0.0481
1.67
1.40
84
1.42
85
<0.0452
1.67
1.27
76
1.27
76
Prep Method: SW3550
Date Prep:
02.05.2020
LCSD Sample Id: 7696030-1-BSD
Limits
%RPD
RPD
Units
Analysis Flag
Limit
Date
34-117
2
30
mg/kg
02.07.2020 01:09
38-111
3
30
mg/kg
02.07.2020 01:09
38-111
2
30
mg/kg
02.07.2020 01:09
37-111
3
30
mg/kg
02.07.2020 01:09
39-116
2
30
mg/kg
02.07.2020 01:09
39-125
2
30
mg/kg
02.07.2020 01:09
42-125
1
30
mg/kg
02.07.2020 01:09
38-120
1
30
mg/kg
02.07.2020 01:09
39-117
1
30
mg/kg
02.07.2020 01:09
13-152
8
30
mg/kg
02.07.2020 01:09
41-128
2
30
mg/kg
02.07.2020 01:09
42-127
1
30
mg/kg
02.07.2020 01:09
40-118
0
30
mg/kg
02.07.2020 01:09
41-108
2
30
mg/kg
02.07.2020 01:09
37-112
0
30
mg/kg
02.07.2020 01:09
36-105
4
30
mg/kg
02.07.2020 01:09
34-121
3
30
mg/kg
02.07.2020 01:09
38-125
2
30
mg/kg
02.07.2020 01:09
35-106
1
30
mg/kg
02.07.2020 01:09
42-123
1
30
mg/kg
02.07.2020 01:09
12-157
1
30
mg/kg
02.07.2020 01:09
40-126
1
30
mg/kg
02.07.2020 01:09
40-119
0
30
mg/kg
02.07.2020 01:09
39-111
2
30
mg/kg
02.07.2020 01:09
40-122
0
30
mg/kg
02.07.2020 01:09
42-125
3
30
mg/kg
02.07.2020 01:09
14-102
5
30
mg/kg
02.07.2020 01:09
41-116
1
30
mg/kg
02.07.2020 01:09
41-118
1
30
mg/kg
02.07.2020 01:09
31-105
1
30
mg/kg
02.07.2020 01:09
39-127
2
30
mg/kg
02.07.2020 01:09
40-129
1
30
mg/kg
02.07.2020 01:09
36-141
2
30
mg/kg
02.07.2020 01:09
34-139
2
30
mg/kg
02.07.2020 01:09
32-141
1
30
mg/kg
02.07.2020 01:09
31-139
0
30
mg/kg
02.07.2020 01:09
44-133
1
30
mg/kg
02.07.2020 01:09
36-113
3
30
mg/kg
02.07.2020 01:09
38-111
3
30
mg/kg
02.07.2020 01:09
32-110
1
30
mg/kg
02.07.2020 01:09
44-136
1
30
mg/kg
02.07.2020 01:09
41-124
2
30
mg/kg
02.07.2020 01:09
35-143
1
30
mg/kg
02.07.2020 01:09
41-119
1
30
mg/kg
02.07.2020 01:09
41-125
2
30
mg/kg
02.07.2020 01:09
42-123
1
30
mg/kg
02.07.2020 01:09
41-133
2
30
mg/kg
02.07.2020 01:09
34-145
2
30
mg/kg
02.07.2020 01:09
38-132
1
30
mg/kg
02.07.2020 01:09
41-121
0
30
mg/kg
02.07.2020 01:09
MS/MSD Percent Recovery [D] = 100*(C-A) / B LCS = Laboratory Control Sample MS = Matrix Spike
Relative Percent Difference RPD = 200* I (C-E) / (C+E) A = Parent Result B = Spike Added
LCS/LCSD Recovery [D] = 100 * (C) / [B] C = MS/LCS Result D = MSD/LCSD % Rec
Log Difference Log Diff. = Log(Sample Duplicate) - Log(Original Sample) E = MSD/LCSD Result
Page 34 of 60
Final 1.000

QC Summary 650957
XENCD
X
AF30 yORIES
WithersRavenel
520 Judson Church Rd
Analytical Method: SVOCs by SW-846 8270D
Prep Method: SW3550
Seq Number: 3115923
Matrix:
Solid
Date Prep: 02.05.2020
MB Sample Id: 7696030-1-BLK
LCS Sample
Id:
7696030-1-BKS
LCSD Sample Id: 7696030-1-BSD
Parameter
MB
Spike
LCS
LCS
LCSD
LCSD
Limits
%RPD RPD
Units
Analysis Fla g
Result
Amount
Result
%Rec
Result
%Rec
Limit
Date
Hexachlorobenzene
<0.0619
1.67
1.42
85
1.45
87
39-128
2
30
mg/kg
02.07.2020 01:09
Hexachlorobutadiene
<0.0411
1.67
1.31
78
1.29
77
39-120
2
30
mg/kg
02.07.2020 01:09
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
<0.0637
1.67
0.966
58
0.961
58
15-117
1
30
mg/kg
02.07.2020 01:09
Hexachloroethane
<0.0574
1.67
1.13
68
1.09
65
40-113
4
30
mg/kg
02.07.2020 01:09
Indeno(1,2,3-c,d)Pyrene
<0.0674
1.67
1.33
80
1.34
80
27-160
1
30
mg/kg
02.07.2020 01:09
Isophorone
<0.0381
1.67
1.11
66
1.11
66
40-115
0
30
mg/kg
02.07.2020 01:09
Naphthalene
<0.0592
1.67
1.17
70
1.16
69
37-113
1
30
mg/kg
02.07.2020 01:09
Nitrobenzene
<0.0659
1.67
1.10
66
1.11
66
37-114
1
30
mg/kg
02.07.2020 01:09
N-Nitrosodi-n-Propylamine
<0.0529
1.67
1.09
65
1.07
64
38-117
2
30
mg/kg
02.07.2020 01:09
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine
<0.0777
1.67
1.28
77
1.30
78
40-127
2
30
mg/kg
02.07.2020 01:09
Pentachlorophenol
<0.0670
1.67
1.28
77
1.34
80
10-107
5
30
mg/kg
02.07.2020 01:09
Phenanthrene
<0.0614
1.67
1.28
77
1.30
78
50-115
2
30
mg/kg
02.07.2020 01:09
Phenol
<0.0519
1.67
1.13
68
1.12
67
24-105
1
30
mg/kg
02.07.2020 01:09
Pyrene
<0.0629
1.67
1.18
71
1.19
71
42-132
1
30
mg/kg
02.07.2020 01:09
Pyridine
<0.0703
1.67
0.650
39
0.656
39
16-135
1
30
mg/kg
02.07.2020 01:09
Surrogate
MB
MB
LCS
LCS
LCSD
LCSD
Limits
Units
Analysis
%Rec
Fla g
%Rec
Flag
u
/oRec
Flag
Date
2-Fluorophenol
72
70
69
25-121
%
02.07.2020 01:09
Nitrobenzene-d5
73
70
70
23-120
%
02.07.2020 01:09
2-Fluorobiphenyl
76
72
72
30-115
%
02.07.2020 01:09
2,4,6-Tribromophenol
95
91
93
19-122
%
02.07.2020 01:09
Terphenyl-D14
77
75
76
18-137
%
02.07.2020 01:09
Phenol-d5
79
71
71
15-110
%
02.07.2020 01:09
Analytical Method: SVOCs by SW-846 8270D
Seq Number: 3115927
Parameter
3,3-Dichlorobenzidine
Benzoic Acid
Analytical Method: SVOCs by SW-846 8270D
Seq Number: 3115923
Parameter
3,3-Dichlorobenzidine
Benzoic Acid
Matrix: Water
MB Sample Id: 7695932-1-BLK
MB
Result
<1.22
<1.59
Matrix: Solid
MB Sample Id: 7696030-1-BLK
MB
Result
<0.0540
<0.0584
MS/MSD Percent Recovery [D] = 100*(C-A) / B
Relative Percent Difference RPD = 200* I (C-E) / (C+E)
LCS/LCSD Recovery [D] = 100 * (C) / [B]
Log Difference Log Diff. = Log(Sample Duplicate) - Log(Original Sample)
Page 35 of 60
Prep Method: SW3510C
Date Prep: 02.04.2020
Units
Analysis Flag
Date
ug/L
02.10.202014:25
ug/L
02.10.202014:25
Prep Method: SW3550
Date Prep: 02.05.2020
LCS = Laboratory Control Sample
A = Parent Result
C = MS/LCS Result
E = MSD/LCSD Result
Final 1.000
Units Analysis Flag
Date
mg/kg 02.07.2020 00:41
mg/kg 02.07.2020 00:41
MS = Matrix Spike
B = Spike Added
D = MSD/LCSD % Rec

XENCD
LAF30RATORIES
QC Summary 650957
Analytical Method: SVOCs by SW-846 8270D
Seq Number: 3115923
Parent Sample Id: 650957-002
Parameter
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
1-Methylnaphthalene
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
2,4-Dichlorophenol
2,4-Dimethylphenol
2,4-Dinitrophenol
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
2-Chloronaphthalene
2-Chlorophenol
2-Methylnaphthalene
2-methylphenol
2-Nitroaniline
2-Nitrophenol
3&4-Methylphenol
3-Nitroaniline
4,6-dinitro-2-methyl phenol
4-Bromophenyl-phenylether
4-chloro-3-methylphenol
4-Chloroaniline
4-Chlorophenyl-phenyl ether
4-Nitroaniline
4-Nitrophenol
Acenaphthene
Acenaphthylene
Aniline (Phenylamine, Aminobenzene)
Anthracene
Benzo(a)anthracene
Benzo(a)pyrene
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
Benzyl Butyl Phthalate
bis(2-chloroethoxy) methane
bis(2-chloroethyl) ether
bis(2-chloroisopropyl) ether
bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate
Chrysene
Dibenz(a,h)Anthracene
Dibenzofuran
Diethyl Phthalate
Dimethyl Phthalate
di-n-Butyl Phthalate
di-n-Octyl Phthalate
Fluoranthene
Fluorene
WithersRavenel
520 Judson Church Rd
Matrix: Soil
MS Sample Id: 650957-002 S
Parent
Spike
MS
MS
MSD
MSD
Result
Amount
Result
%Rec
Result
%Rec
<0.0708
1.80
1.42
79
1.44
79
<0.0648
1.80
1.40
78
1.39
76
<0.0632
1.80
1.33
74
1.33
73
<0.0444
1.80
1.33
74
1.32
72
<0.0785
1.80
1.37
76
1.39
76
<0.0737
1.80
1.56
87
1.57
86
<0.0773
1.80
1.48
82
1.54
84
<0.0509
1.80
1.59
88
1.61
88
<0.0729
1.80
1.47
82
1.49
81
<0.0644
1.80
1.45
81
1.48
81
<0.0644
1.80
1.62
90
1.64
90
<0.0520
1.80
1.52
84
1.59
87
<0.0729
1.80
1.17
65
1.20
66
<0.0717
1.80
1.45
81
1.45
79
<0.0612
1.80
1.40
78
1.41
77
<0.0560
1.80
1.51
84
1.49
81
<0.0560
1.80
1.54
86
1.62
89
<0.0505
1.80
1.58
88
1.60
87
<0.119
1.80
1.41
78
1.39
76
<0.0553
1.80
1.48
82
1.53
84
<0.0696
1.80
1.54
86
1.59
87
<0.0681
1.80
1.52
84
1.58
86
<0.0570
1.80
1.49
83
1.53
84
<0.0665
1.80
1.50
83
1.53
84
<0.0761
1.80
1.44
80
1.52
83
<0.0608
1.80
1.56
87
1.58
86
<0.0493
1.80
1.30
72
1.35
74
<0.0560
1.80
1.33
74
1.37
75
<0.0682
1.80
1.33
74
1.39
76
<0.0440
1.80
1.23
68
1.24
68
<0.0593
1.80
1.41
78
1.44
79
<0.0648
1.80
1.33
74
1.37
75
<0.0589
1.80
1.50
83
1.56
85
<0.0653
1.80
1.35
75
1.40
77
<0.0660
1.80
1.54
86
1.56
85
<0.0689
1.80
1.57
87
1.60
87
<0.0601
1.80
1.22
68
1.24
68
<0.0481
1.80
1.35
75
1.37
75
<0.0569
1.80
1.31
73
1.32
72
<0.0541
1.80
1.36
76
1.37
75
<0.0649
1.80
1.24
69
1.27
69
<0.0533
1.80
1.31
73
1.36
74
<0.0776
1.80
1.56
87
1.60
87
<0.0512
1.80
1.41
78
1.48
81
<0.0605
1.80
1.43
79
1.48
81
<0.0644
1.80
1.47
82
1.52
83
<0.0737
1.80
1.43
79
1.46
80
<0.0665
1.80
1.26
70
1.29
70
<0.0520
1.80
1.51
84
1.54
84
<0.0489
1.80
1.38
77
1.45
79
Prep Method: SW3550
Date Prep: 02.05.2020
MSD Sample Id: 650957-002
SD
Limits
%RPD
RPD
Units
Analysis
Limit
Date
34-117
1
30
mg/kg
02.07.2020 02:33
38-111
1
30
mg/kg
02.07.2020 02:33
38-111
0
30
mg/kg
02.07.2020 02:33
37-111
1
30
mg/kg
02.07.2020 02:33
39-116
1
30
mg/kg
02.07.2020 02:33
39-125
1
30
mg/kg
02.07.2020 02:33
42-125
4
30
mg/kg
02.07.2020 02:33
38-120
1
30
mg/kg
02.07.2020 02:33
39-117
1
30
mg/kg
02.07.2020 02:33
13-152
2
30
mg/kg
02.07.2020 02:33
41-128
1
30
mg/kg
02.07.2020 02:33
42-127
5
30
mg/kg
02.07.2020 02:33
40-118
3
30
mg/kg
02.07.2020 02:33
41-108
0
30
mg/kg
02.07.2020 02:33
37-112
1
30
mg/kg
02.07.2020 02:33
36-105
1
30
mg/kg
02.07.2020 02:33
34-121
5
30
mg/kg
02.07.2020 02:33
38-125
1
30
mg/kg
02.07.2020 02:33
35-106
1
30
mg/kg
02.07.2020 02:33
42-123
3
30
mg/kg
02.07.2020 02:33
12-157
3
30
mg/kg
02.07.2020 02:33
40-126
4
30
mg/kg
02.07.2020 02:33
40-119
3
30
mg/kg
02.07.2020 02:33
39-111
2
30
mg/kg
02.07.2020 02:33
40-122
5
30
mg/kg
02.07.2020 02:33
42-125
1
30
mg/kg
02.07.2020 02:33
14-102
4
30
mg/kg
02.07.2020 02:33
41-116
3
30
mg/kg
02.07.2020 02:33
41-118
4
30
mg/kg
02.07.2020 02:33
31-105
1
30
mg/kg
02.07.2020 02:33
39-127
2
30
mg/kg
02.07.2020 02:33
40-129
3
30
mg/kg
02.07.2020 02:33
36-141
4
30
mg/kg
02.07.2020 02:33
34-139
4
30
mg/kg
02.07.2020 02:33
32-141
1
30
mg/kg
02.07.2020 02:33
31-139
2
30
mg/kg
02.07.2020 02:33
44-133
2
30
mg/kg
02.07.2020 02:33
36-113
1
30
mg/kg
02.07.2020 02:33
38-111
1
30
mg/kg
02.07.2020 02:33
32-110
1
30
mg/kg
02.07.2020 02:33
44-136
2
30
mg/kg
02.07.2020 02:33
41-124
4
30
mg/kg
02.07.2020 02:33
35-143
3
30
mg/kg
02.07.2020 02:33
41-119
5
30
mg/kg
02.07.2020 02:33
41-125
3
30
mg/kg
02.07.2020 02:33
42-123
3
30
mg/kg
02.07.2020 02:33
41-133
2
30
mg/kg
02.07.2020 02:33
34-145
2
30
mg/kg
02.07.2020 02:33
38-132
2
30
mg/kg
02.07.2020 02:33
41-121
5
30
mg/kg
02.07.2020 02:33
MS/MSD Percent Recovery [D] = 100*(C-A) / B LCS = Laboratory Control Sample MS = Matrix Spike
Relative Percent Difference RPD = 200* I (C-E) / (C+E) A = Parent Result B = Spike Added
LCS/LCSD Recovery [D] = 100 * (C) / [B] C = MS/LCS Result D = MSD/LCSD % Rec
Log Difference Log Diff. = Log(Sample Duplicate) - Log(Original Sample) E = MSD/LCSD Result
Flag
Page 36 of 60
Final 1.000

QC Summary 650957
XENCD
X
AF30 yORIES
Analytical Method: SVOCs by SW-846 8270D
Seq Number: 3115923
Parent Sample Id: 650957-002
Parameter
Hexachlorobenzene
Hexachlorobutadiene
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
Hexachloroethane
Indeno(1,2,3-c,d)Pyrene
Isophorone
Naphthalene
Nitrobenzene
N-Nitrosodi-n-Propylamine
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine
Pentachlorophenol
Phenanthrene
Phenol
Pyrene
Pyridine
Surrogate
2-Fluorophenol
Nitrobenzene-d5
2-Fluorobiphenyl
2,4,6-Tribromophenol
Terphenyl-D 14
Phenol-d5
Parent
Result
<0.0670
<0.0445
<0.0689
<0.0621
<0.0730
<0.0412
<0.0641
<0.0713
<0.0572
<0.0840
<0.0725
<0.0665
<0.0562
<0.0681
<0.0761
Spike
Amount
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.80
WithersRavenel
520 Judson Church Rd
Prep Method: SW3550
Matrix:
Soil
Date Prep: 02.05.2020
MS Sample Id:
650957-002 S
MSD Sample Id: 650957-002
SD
MS
MS
MSD
MSD
Limits
%RPD RPD
Units
Analysis
Result
%Rec
Result
%Rec
Limit
Date
1.56
87
1.59
87
39-128
2
30
mg/kg
02.07.2020 02:33
1.46
81
1.46
80
39-120
0
30
mg/kg
02.07.2020 02:33
1.06
59
1.08
59
15-117
2
30
mg/kg
02.07.2020 02:33
1.27
71
1.26
69
40-113
1
30
mg/kg
02.07.2020 02:33
1.44
80
1.38
75
27-160
4
30
mg/kg
02.07.2020 02:33
1.32
73
1.34
73
40-115
2
30
mg/kg
02.07.2020 02:33
1.35
75
1.38
75
37-113
2
30
mg/kg
02.07.2020 02:33
1.34
74
1.35
74
37-114
1
30
mg/kg
02.07.2020 02:33
1.30
72
1.31
72
38-117
1
30
mg/kg
02.07.2020 02:33
1.40
78
1.45
79
40-127
4
30
mg/kg
02.07.2020 02:33
1.45
81
1.43
78
10-107
1
30
mg/kg
02.07.2020 02:33
1.38
77
1.42
78
50-115
3
30
mg/kg
02.07.2020 02:33
1.37
76
1.37
75
24-105
0
30
mg/kg
02.07.2020 02:33
1.24
69
1.27
69
42-132
2
30
mg/kg
02.07.2020 02:33
0.767
43
0.842
46
16-135
9
30
mg/kg
02.07.2020 02:33
MS
MS
MSD
MSD
Limits
Units
Analysis
%Ree
Flag
%Rec
Flag
Date
79
79
25-121
%
02.07.2020 02:33
78
79
23-120
%
02.07.2020 02:33
77
78
30-115
%
02.07.2020 02:33
98
99
19-122
%
02.07.2020 02:33
75
77
18-137
%
02.07.2020 02:33
79
78
15-110
%
02.07.2020 02:33
MS/MSD Percent Recovery [D] = 100*(C-A) / B LCS = Laboratory Control Sample
Relative Percent Difference RPD = 200* I (C-E) / (C+E) A = Parent Result
LCS/LCSD Recovery [D] = 100 * (C) / [B] C = MS/LCS Result
Log Difference Log Diff. = Log(Sample Duplicate) - Log(Original Sample) E = MSD/LCSD Result
MS = Matrix Spike
B = Spike Added
D = MSD/LCSD % Rec
Flag
Page 37 of 60
Final 1.000

QC Summary 650957
XENCD
X
AF30 yORIES
Analytical Method: SVOCs by SW-846 8270D
Seq Number: 3115927
Parent Sample Id: 650820-010
Parameter
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
2,4-Dichlorophenol
2,4-Dimethylphenol
2,4-Dinitrophenol
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
2-Chloronaphthalene
2-Chlorophenol
2-Methylnaphthalene
2-methylphenol
2-Nitroaniline
2-Nitrophenol
3&4-Methylphenol
3-Nitroaniline
4,6-dinitro-2-methyl phenol
4-Bromophenyl-phenylether
4-chloro-3-methylphenol
4-Chloroaniline
4-Chlorophenyl Phenyl Ether
4-Nitroaniline
4-Nitrophenol
Acenaphthene
Acenaphthylene
Aniline (Phenylamine, Aminobenzene)
Anthracene
Benzo(a)anthracene
Benzo(a)pyrene
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
Benzyl Butyl Phthalate
bis(2-chloroethoxy) methane
bis(2-chloroethyl) ether
bis(2-chloroisopropyl) ether
bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate
Chrysene
Dibenz(a,h)anthracene
Dibenzofuran
Diethylphthalate
Dimethyl Phthalate
Di-n-butylphthalate
di-n-Octyl Phthalate
Fluoranthene
Fluorene
Hexachlorobenzene
Parent
Result
<1.35
<1.36
<1.23
2.16
<0.560
<1.47
<1.44
<1.63
<1.93
<1.51
<1.28
<1.29
<1.35
<1.26
<1.30
<1.71
<1.51
<1.63
<1.71
<1.51
<1.30
<1.14
<1.70
<1.14
<1.42
<1.82
<1.18
<1.18
<1.10
<1.45
<1.46
<1.12
<0.920
<0.970
<1.35
<1.82
<1.25
<1.78
<1.24
<1.20
<1.11
<1.03
<1.24
<1.38
<1.45
<1.52
<1.28
<1.41
<1.43
<1.46
Spike
Amount
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
WithersRavenel
520 Judson Church Rd
Prep Method: SW3510C
Matrix: Ground Water
Date Prep: 02.04.2020
MS Sample Id: 650820-010 S
MS
MS
Limits
Units
Analysis
Result
%Rec
Date
28.0
56
34-117
ug/L
02.10.2020 21:23
28.7
57
38-111
ug/L
02.10.2020 21:23
27.1
54
38-111
ug/L
02.10.2020 21:23
28.9
53
37-111
ug/L
02.10.2020 21:23
31.3
63
39-125
ug/L
02.10.2020 21:23
29.5
59
42-125
ug/L
02.10.2020 21:23
29.8
60
38-120
ug/L
02.10.2020 21:23
25.1
50
39-117
ug/L
02.10.2020 21:23
30.0
60
13-152
ug/L
02.10.2020 21:23
34.0
68
41-128
ug/L
02.10.2020 21:23
33.1
66
42-127
ug/L
02.10.2020 21:23
24.9
50
40-118
ug/L
02.10.2020 21:23
24.5
49
41-108
ug/L
02.10.2020 21:23
30.0
60
37-112
ug/L
02.10.2020 21:23
23.9
48
36-105
ug/L
02.10.2020 21:23
34.2
68
34-121
ug/L
02.10.2020 21:23
27.1
54
38-125
ug/L
02.10.2020 21:23
23.6
47
35-106
ug/L
02.10.2020 21:23
23.7
47
42-123
ug/L
02.10.2020 21:23
27.7
55
12-157
ug/L
02.10.2020 21:23
31.8
64
40-126
ug/L
02.10.2020 21:23
30.7
61
40-119
ug/L
02.10.2020 21:23
22.2
44
39-111
ug/L
02.10.2020 21:23
31.9
64
40-122
ug/L
02.10.2020 21:23
26.6
53
42-125
ug/L
02.10.2020 21:23
24.4
49
14-102
ug/L
02.10.2020 21:23
28.5
57
41-116
ug/L
02.10.2020 21:23
27.6
55
41-118
ug/L
02.10.2020 21:23
14.7
29
31-105
ug/L
02.10.2020 21:23
29.2
58
39-127
ug/L
02.10.2020 21:23
27.2
54
40-129
ug/L
02.10.2020 21:23
31.1
62
36-141
ug/L
02.10.2020 21:23
30.3
61
34-139
ug/L
02.10.2020 21:23
31.0
62
32-141
ug/L
02.10.2020 21:23
35.0
70
31-139
ug/L
02.10.2020 21:23
27.9
56
44-133
ug/L
02.10.2020 21:23
28.6
57
36-113
ug/L
02.10.2020 21:23
28.7
57
38-111
ug/L
02.10.2020 21:23
29.2
58
32-110
ug/L
02.10.2020 21:23
28.0
56
44-136
ug/L
02.10.2020 21:23
28.3
57
41-124
ug/L
02.10.2020 21:23
31.5
63
35-143
ug/L
02.10.2020 21:23
31.6
63
41-119
ug/L
02.10.2020 21:23
31.9
64
41-125
ug/L
02.10.2020 21:23
29.0
58
42-123
ug/L
02.10.2020 21:23
32.1
64
41-133
ug/L
02.10.2020 21:23
27.9
56
34-145
ug/L
02.10.2020 21:23
32.7
65
38-132
ug/L
02.10.2020 21:23
31.4
63
41-121
ug/L
02.10.2020 21:23
30.5
61
39-128
ug/L
02.10.2020 21:23
MS/MSD Percent Recovery [D] = 100*(C-A) / B LCS = Laboratory Control Sample MS = Matrix Spike
Relative Percent Difference RPD = 200* I (C-E) / (C+E) A = Parent Result B = Spike Added
LCS/LCSD Recovery [D] = 100 * (C) / [B] C = MS/LCS Result D = MSD/LCSD % Rec
Log Difference Log Diff. = Log(Sample Duplicate) - Log(Original Sample) E = MSD/LCSD Result
Flag
V`I
Page 38 of 60
Final 1.000

QC Summary
650957
X?�PyCO
C]RIES
WithersRavenel
520 Judson Church Rd
Analytical Method: SVOCs by SW-846 8270D
Prep Method: SW3510C
Seq Number: 3115927
Matrix: Ground Water
Date Prep: 02.04.2020
Parent Sample Id: 650820-010
MS Sample Id: 650820-010 S
Parameter
Parent
Spike
MS
MS
Limits
Units
Analysis
Result
Amount
Result
%Rec
Date
Hexachlorobutadiene
<1.12
50.0
26.4
53
39-120
ug/L
02.10.2020 21:23
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
<1.16
50.0
24.4
49
15-117
ug/L
02.10.2020 21:23
Hexachloroethane
<1.13
50.0
25.8
52
40-113
ug/L
02.10.2020 21:23
Indeno(1,2,3-c,d)Pyrene
<0.960
50.0
27.1
54
27-160
ug/L
02.10.2020 21:23
Isophorone
<1.67
50.0
27.7
55
40-115
ug/L
02.10.2020 21:23
Naphthalene
<1.25
50.0
28.1
56
37-113
ug/L
02.10.2020 21:23
Nitrobenzene
<1.28
50.0
28.8
58
37-114
ug/L
02.10.2020 21:23
N-Nitrosodi-n-Propylamine
<1.57
50.0
29.7
59
38-117
ug/L
02.10.2020 21:23
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine
<1.53
50.0
22.5
45
40-127
ug/L
02.10.2020 21:23
Pentachlorophenol
<1.35
50.0
34.1
68
10-107
ug/L
02.10.2020 21:23
Phenanthrene
<1.34
50.0
30.3
61
50-115
ug/L
02.10.2020 21:23
Phenol
<1.27
50.0
17.3
35
24-105
ug/L
02.10.2020 21:23
Pyrene
<1.22
50.0
27.4
55
23-152
ug/L
02.10.2020 21:23
Pyridine
<1.10
50.0
7.02
14
16-135
ug/L
02.10.2020 21:23
Surrogate
MS MS
Limits
Units
Analysis
%Rec Flag
Date
2-Fluorophenol
58
30-105
%
02.10.2020 21:23
Nitrobenzene-d5
91
46-111
%
02.10.2020 21:23
2-Fluorobiphenyl
85
44-117
%
02.10.2020 21:23
2,4,6-Tribromophenol
101
48-117
%
02.10.2020 21:23
Terphenyl-D14
79
46-126
%
02.10.2020 21:23
Phenol-d5
54
35-105
%
02.10.2020 21:23
MS/MSD Percent Recovery
[D] = 100*(C-A) / B
LCS = Laboratory Control Sample
MS
= Matrix Spike
Relative Percent Difference
RPD = 200*
I (C-E) / (C+E)
A = Parent Result
B =
Spike Added
LCS/LCSD Recovery
[D] = 100 *
(C) / [B]
C = MS/LCS Result
D =
MSD/LCSD % Rec
Log Difference
Log Diff. =
Log(Sample Duplicate)
- Log(Original Sample)
E = MSD/LCSD Result
Page 39 of 60
Final 1.000
Flag
V

QC Summary 650957
xEnicv
X
AF30 yORIES
Analytical Method:
Seq Number:
MB Sample Id:
Parameter
VOCs by SW-846 8260B
3115235
7695662-1-BLK
Benzene
Bromobenzene
Bromochloromethane
Bromodichloromethane
Bromoform
Methyl bromide
tert-Butylbenzene
Sec-Butylbenzene
n-Butylbenzene
Carbon Tetrachloride
Chlorobenzene
Chloroethane
Chloroform
Methyl Chloride
2-Chlorotoluene
4-Chlorotoluene
p-Cymene (p-Isopropyltoluene)
1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane
Dibromochloromethane
1,2-Dibromoethane
Methylene Bromide
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
Dichlorodifluoromethane
1,2-Dichloroethane
1, 1 -Dichloroethane
trans-1,2-dichloroethylene
cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene
1, 1 -Dichloroethene
2,2-Dichloropropane
1,3-Dichloropropane
1,2-Dichloropropane
trans-1,3-dichloropropene
1, 1 -Dichloropropene
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
Ethylbenzene
Hexachlorobutadiene
Isopropylbenzene
Methylene Chloride
MTBE
Naphthalene
n-Propylbenzene
Styrene
1, 1, 1,2-Tetrachloroethane
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
Tetrachloroethylene
Toluene
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
WithersRavenel
520 Judson Church Rd
Matrix: Solid
LCS Sample Id: 7695662-1-BKS
MB
Spike
LCS
LCS
LCSD
LCSD
Result
Amount
Result
%Rec
Result
%Rec
<0.000513
0.0500
0.0520
104
0.0538
108
<0.000854
0.0500
0.0536
107
0.0568
114
<0.00106
0.0500
0.0421
84
0.0436
87
<0.000501
0.0500
0.0484
97
0.0519
104
<0.000959
0.0500
0.0518
104
0.0542
108
<0.000250
0.0500
0.0567
113
0.0613
123
<0.000834
0.0500
0.0620
124
0.0635
127
<0.000657
0.0500
0.0568
114
0.0569
114
<0.000882
0.0500
0.0566
113
0.0558
112
<0.000742
0.0500
0.0561
112
0.0599
120
<0.000579
0.0500
0.0520
104
0.0573
115
<0.00244
0.0500
0.0600
120
0.0529
106
<0.000741
0.0500
0.0526
105
0.0553
ill
<0.00230
0.0500
0.0605
121
0.0560
112
<0.000708
0.0500
0.0587
117
0.0593
119
<0.000553
0.0500
0.0587
117
0.0597
119
<0.000800
0.0500
0.0568
114
0.0596
119
<0.000873
0.0500
0.0578
116
0.0604
121
<0.000994
0.0500
0.0498
100
0.0559
112
<0.000863
0.0500
0.0462
92
0.0496
99
<0.000600
0.0500
0.0460
92
0.0490
98
<0.00129
0.0500
0.0579
116
0.0568
114
<0.000997
0.0500
0.0589
118
0.0608
122
<0.000684
0.0500
0.0588
118
0.0601
120
<0.00118
0.0500
0.0616
123
0.0503
101
<0.000597
0.0500
0.0510
102
0.0566
113
<0.000802
0.0500
0.0541
108
0.0539
108
<0.000780
0.0500
0.0470
94
0.0450
90
<0.000210
0.0500
0.0480
96
0.0470
94
<0.00116
0.0500
0.0490
98
0.0450
90
<0.000599
0.0500
0.0573
115
0.0554
ill
<0.000688
0.0500
0.0455
91
0.0510
102
<0.000929
0.0500
0.0533
107
0.0598
120
<0.000670
0.0500
0.0495
99
0.0541
108
<0.000539
0.0500
0.0542
108
0.0585
117
<0.000100
0.0500
0.0489
98
0.0533
107
<0.000565
0.0500
0.0577
115
0.0597
119
<0.000852
0.0500
0.0565
113
0.0523
105
<0.000759
0.0500
0.0557
111
0.0569
114
<0.00216
0.0500
0.0589
118
0.0570
114
<0.000693
0.100
0.100
100
0.0974
97
<0.00130
0.0500
0.0571
114
0.0556
111
<0.000782
0.0500
0.0560
112
0.0555
ill
<0.000742
0.0500
0.0531
106
0.0558
112
<0.000525
0.0500
0.0509
102
0.0560
112
<0.00119
0.0500
0.0521
104
0.0525
105
<0.000150
0.0500
0.0563
113
0.0569
114
<0.000588
0.0500
0.0537
107
0.0574
115
<0.000574
0.0500
0.0542
108
0.0512
102
<0.000873
0.0500
0.0529
106
0.0505
101
Prep Method: SW5035A
Date Prep:
01.31.2020
LCSD Sample Id: 7695662-1-BSD
Limits
%RPD
RPD
Units
Analysis Flag
Limit
Date
80-120
3
20
mg/kg
01.31.202014:47
75-125
6
20
mg/kg
01.31.202014:47
65-120
4
20
mg/kg
01.31.202014:47
75-120
7
20
mg/kg
01.31.202014:47
70-130
5
20
mg/kg
01.31.202014:47
30-145
8
20
mg/kg
01.31.202014:47
70-130
2
20
mg/kg
01.31.202014:47
70-125
0
20
mg/kg
01.31.202014:47
70-130
1
20
mg/kg
01.31.202014:47
65-140
7
20
mg/kg
01.31.202014:47
80-120
10
20
mg/kg
01.31.202014:47
60-135
13
20
mg/kg
01.31.202014:47
65-135
5
20
mg/kg
01.31.202014:47
40-125
8
20
mg/kg
01.31.202014:47
75-125
1
20
mg/kg
01.31.202014:47
75-130
2
20
mg/kg
01.31.202014:47
75-125
5
20
mg/kg
01.31.202014:47
59-125
4
20
mg/kg
01.31.202014:47
60-135
12
20
mg/kg
01.31.202014:47
80-130
7
20
mg/kg
01.31.202014:47
75-125
6
20
mg/kg
01.31.202014:47
70-125
2
20
mg/kg
01.31.202014:47
75-125
3
20
mg/kg
01.31.202014:47
75-125
2
20
mg/kg
01.31.202014:47
30-155
20
20
mg/kg
01.31.202014:47
70-130
10
20
mg/kg
01.31.202014:47
70-150
0
20
mg/kg
01.31.202014:47
60-140
4
20
mg/kg
01.31.202014:47
70-125
2
20
mg/kg
01.31.202014:47
70-130
9
20
mg/kg
01.31.202014:47
70-130
3
20
mg/kg
01.31.202014:47
75-125
11
20
mg/kg
01.31.202014:47
75-125
11
20
mg/kg
01.31.202014:47
55-140
9
20
mg/kg
01.31.202014:47
75-130
8
20
mg/kg
01.31.202014:47
70-125
9
20
mg/kg
01.31.202014:47
75-125
3
20
mg/kg
01.31.202014:47
50-130
8
20
mg/kg
01.31.202014:47
75-125
2
20
mg/kg
01.31.202014:47
55-140
3
20
mg/kg
01.31.202014:47
65-125
3
20
mg/kg
01.31.202014:47
55-140
3
20
mg/kg
01.31.202014:47
70-130
1
20
mg/kg
01.31.202014:47
65-135
5
20
mg/kg
01.31.202014:47
72-125
10
20
mg/kg
01.31.202014:47
65-148
1
20
mg/kg
01.31.202014:47
45-150
1
20
mg/kg
01.31.202014:47
75-120
7
20
mg/kg
01.31.202014:47
55-140
6
20
mg/kg
01.31.202014:47
65-135
5
20
mg/kg
01.31.202014:47
MS/MSD Percent Recovery [D] = 100*(C-A) / B LCS = Laboratory Control Sample MS = Matrix Spike
Relative Percent Difference RPD = 200* I (C-E) / (C+E) A = Parent Result B = Spike Added
LCS/LCSD Recovery [D] = 100 * (C) / [B] C = MS/LCS Result D = MSD/LCSD % Rec
Log Difference Log Diff. = Log(Sample Duplicate) - Log(Original Sample) E = MSD/LCSD Result
Page 40 of 60
Final 1.000

QC Summary
650957
XEIVCO
LAF30RATCIRIES
WithersRavenel
520
Judson Church
Rd
Analytical Method:
VOCs by SW-846 8260B
Prep Method: SW5035A
Seq Number:
3115235
Matrix:
Solid
Date Prep: 01.31.2020
MB Sample Id:
7695662-1-BLK
LCS Sample Id:
7695662-1-BKS
LCSD Sample Id: 7695662-1-BSD
Parameter
MB
Spike
LCS LCS
LCSD
LCSD
Limits
%RPD RPD
Units
Analysis Fla g
Result
Amount
Result %Rec
Result
%Rec
Limit
Date
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
<0.000670
0.0500
0.0464 93
0.0498
100
75-151
7 20
mg/kg
01.31.202014:47
1, 1, 1 -Trichloroethane
<0.000753
0.0500
0.0559 112
0.0579
116
65-145
4 20
mg/kg
01.31.202014:47
Trichloroethylene
<0.000707
0.0500
0.0540 108
0.0579
116
70-125
7 20
mg/kg
01.31.202014:47
Trichlorofluoromethane
<0.00351
0.0500
0.0602 120
0.0592
118
60-145
2 20
mg/kg
01.31.202014:47
1,2,3-Trichloropropane
<0.00165
0.0500
0.0558 112
0.0592
118
75-125
6 20
mg/kg
01.31.202014:47
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene
<0.000720
0.0500
0.0559 112
0.0556
111
75-130
1 20
mg/kg
01.31.202014:47
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene
<0.000814
0.0500
0.0549 110
0.0554
111
75-130
1 20
mg/kg
01.31.202014:47
Vinyl Chloride
<0.00201
0.0500
0.0586 117
0.0576
115
50-145
2 20
mg/kg
01.31.2020 14:47
o-Xylene
<0.000716
0.0500
0.0533 107
0.0553
111
80-120
4 20
mg/kg
01.31.202014:47
m,p-Xylenes
<0.00121
0.100
0.112 112
0.117
117
75-130
4 20
mg/kg
01.31.202014:47
Surrogate
MB
MB
LCS
LCS
LCSD
LCSD
Limits
Units
Analysis
%Rec
Flag
%Rec
Flag
%Rec
Flag
Date
1,2-Dichloroethane-D4
107
90
93
53-159
%
01.31.202014:47
Toluene-138
104
90
98
70-130
%
01.31.202014:47
4-Bromofluorobenzene
91
97
99
30-180
%
01.31.202014:47
Analytical Method:
VOCs by SW-846 8260B
Prep Method: SW5035A
Seq Number:
3115579
Matrix:
Solid
Date Prep: 02.03.2020
MB Sample Id:
7695767-1-BLK
LCS Sample Id:
7695767-1-BKS
LCSD Sample Id: 7695767-1-BSD
Parameter
MB
Spike
LCS LCS
LCSD
LCSD
Limits
%RPD RPD
Units
Analysis Fla S
Result
Amount
Result %Rec
Result
%Rec
Limit
Date
Tetrachloroethylene
<0.000150
0.0500
0.0508 102
0.0535
107
45-150
5 20
mg/kg
02.03.202012:12
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene
<0.000720
0.0500
0.0448 90
0.0459
92
75-130
2 20
mg/kg
02.03.202012:12
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene
<0.000814
0.0500
0.0449 90
0.0465
93
75-130
4 20
mg/kg
02.03.202012:12
o-Xylene
<0.000716
0.0500
0.0492 98
0.0531
106
80-120
8 20
mg/kg
02.03.202012:12
m,p-Xylenes
<0.00121
0.100
0.103 103
0.112
112
75-130
8 20
mg/kg
02.03.202012:12
Surrogate
MB
MB
LCS
LCS
LCSD
LCSD
Limits
Units
Analysis
%Rec
Flag
%Rec
Flag
%Ree
Flag
Date
1,2-Dichloroethane-D4
106
103
103
53-159
%
02.03.202012:12
Toluene-138
102
106
105
70-130
%
02.03.202012:12
4-Bromofluorobenzene
90
95
91
30-180
%
02.03.202012:12
MS/MSD Percent Recovery
[D] = 100*(C-A) / B
LCS
= Laboratory Control Sample
MS =
Matrix Spike
Relative Percent Difference
RPD = 200*
I (C-E) / (C+E)
A
= Parent Result
B = Spike Added
LCS/LCSD Recovery
[D] = 100 * (C) / [B]
C
= MS/LCS Result
D = MSD/LCSD % Rec
Log Difference
Log Diff. = Log(Sample
Duplicate)
- Log(Original Sample)
E
= MSD/LCSD Result
Page 41 of 60
Final 1.000

xEnicv
LAF30RATORIES
QC Summary 650957
Analytical Method:
Seq Number:
MB Sample Id:
Parameter
VOCs by SW-846 8260B
3115557
7695860-1-BLK
Benzene
Bromobenzene
Bromochloromethane
Bromodichloromethane
Bromoform
Methyl bromide
n-Butylbenzene
Sec-Butylbenzene
tert-Butylbenzene
Carbon Tetrachloride
Chlorobenzene
Chloroethane
Chloroform
Methyl Chloride
2-Chlorotoluene
4-Chlorotoluene
p-Cymene (p-Isopropyltoluene)
Dibromochloromethane
1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane
1,2-Dibromoethane
Methylene Bromide
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
Dichlorodifluoromethane
1, 1 -Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloroethane
1, 1 -Dichloroethene
cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene
trans-1,2-dichloroethylene
1,2-Dichloropropane
1,3-Dichloropropane
2,2-Dichloropropane
1, 1 -Dichloropropene
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
trans-1,3-dichloropropene
Ethylbenzene
Hexachlorobutadiene
Isopropylbenzene
Methylene Chloride
MTBE
Naphthalene
n-Propylbenzene
Styrene
1, 1, 1,2-Tetrachloroethane
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
Tetrachloroethylene
Toluene
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
WithersRavenel
520 Judson Church Rd
Matrix: Water
LCS Sample Id: 7695860-1-BKS
MB
Spike
LCS
LCS
LCSD
LCSD
Result
Amount
Result
%Rec
Result
%Rec
<0.160
50.0
48.3
97
48.0
96
<0.210
50.0
48.5
97
48.4
97
<0.200
50.0
49.7
99
49.2
98
<0.250
50.0
52.1
104
53.1
106
<0.170
50.0
48.5
97
46.6
93
<0.250
50.0
55.4
ill
57.2
114
<0.170
50.0
47.3
95
47.5
95
<0.210
50.0
50.9
102
51.2
102
<0.180
50.0
50.0
100
50.4
101
<0.330
50.0
54.9
110
54.0
108
<0.150
50.0
50.8
102
50.6
101
<0.250
50.0
63.1
126
59.6
119
<0.160
50.0
49.8
100
50.6
101
<0.250
50.0
48.4
97
47.3
95
<0.190
50.0
48.7
97
48.4
97
<0.130
50.0
50.5
101
51.3
103
<0.130
50.0
52.6
105
53.0
106
<0.150
50.0
47.4
95
47.6
95
<0.190
50.0
50.3
101
50.1
100
<0.180
50.0
51.2
102
51.1
102
<0.600
50.0
50.5
101
50.0
100
<0.140
50.0
50.6
101
50.0
100
<0.170
50.0
50.5
101
51.9
104
<0.170
50.0
50.4
101
51.3
103
<0.220
50.0
66.7
133
64.7
129
<0.110
50.0
49.4
99
47.6
95
<0.180
50.0
48.7
97
48.5
97
<0.200
50.0
50.5
101
50.5
101
<0.210
50.0
50.6
101
48.8
98
<0.210
50.0
51.0
102
49.4
99
<0.150
50.0
47.5
95
46.1
92
<0.190
50.0
47.4
95
48.1
96
<0.210
50.0
64.6
129
62.5
125
<0.100
50.0
50.9
102
49.7
99
<0.100
50.0
54.8
110
55.0
110
<0.110
50.0
49.0
98
48.4
97
<0.190
50.0
49.6
99
49.6
99
<1.00
50.0
53.8
108
55.0
110
<0.150
50.0
49.7
99
49.5
99
<0.420
50.0
51.8
104
50.1
100
<0.180
100
98.3
98
96.4
96
<0.220
50.0
44.1
88
44.2
88
<0.180
50.0
51.5
103
51.3
103
<0.180
50.0
46.8
94
46.7
93
<0.240
50.0
52.3
105
52.1
104
<0.180
50.0
45.9
92
46.0
92
<0.160
50.0
52.7
105
51.3
103
<0.140
50.0
47.4
95
47.8
96
<0.250
50.0
47.2
94
47.1
94
<0.170
50.0
47.2
94
46.5
93
Prep Method:
SW5030B
Date Prep:
02.04.2020
LCSD Sample Id: 7695860-1-BSD
Limits
%RPD
RPD
Units
Analysis
Limit
Date
80-120
1
20
ug/L
02.04.202011:58
75-125
0
20
ug/L
02.04.202011:58
65-120
1
20
ug/L
02.04.202011:58
75-120
2
20
ug/L
02.04.202011:58
70-130
4
20
ug/L
02.04.202011:58
30-145
3
20
ug/L
02.04.202011:58
70-130
0
20
ug/L
02.04.202011:58
70-125
1
20
ug/L
02.04.202011:58
70-130
1
20
ug/L
02.04.202011:58
65-140
2
20
ug/L
02.04.202011:58
80-120
0
20
ug/L
02.04.202011:58
60-135
6
20
ug/L
02.04.202011:58
65-135
2
20
ug/L
02.04.202011:58
40-125
2
20
ug/L
02.04.202011:58
75-125
1
20
ug/L
02.04.202011:58
75-130
2
20
ug/L
02.04.202011:58
75-125
1
20
ug/L
02.04.202011:58
60-135
0
20
ug/L
02.04.202011:58
59-125
0
20
ug/L
02.04.202011:58
80-130
0
20
ug/L
02.04.202011:58
75-125
1
20
ug/L
02.04.202011:58
70-125
1
20
ug/L
02.04.202011:58
75-125
3
20
ug/L
02.04.202011:58
75-125
2
20
ug/L
02.04.202011:58
30-155
3
20
ug/L
02.04.202011:58
70-150
4
20
ug/L
02.04.202011:58
70-130
0
20
ug/L
02.04.202011:58
70-130
0
20
ug/L
02.04.202011:58
70-125
4
20
ug/L
02.04.202011:58
60-140
3
20
ug/L
02.04.202011:58
75-125
3
20
ug/L
02.04.202011:58
75-125
1
20
ug/L
02.04.202011:58
70-130
3
20
ug/L
02.04.202011:58
75-130
2
20
ug/L
02.04.202011:58
70-125
0
20
ug/L
02.04.202011:58
55-140
1
20
ug/L
02.04.202011:58
75-125
0
20
ug/L
02.04.202011:58
50-130
2
20
ug/L
02.04.202011:58
75-125
0
20
ug/L
02.04.202011:58
55-140
3
20
ug/L
02.04.202011:58
65-125
2
20
ug/L
02.04.202011:58
55-140
0
20
ug/L
02.04.202011:58
70-130
0
20
ug/L
02.04.202011:58
65-135
0
20
ug/L
02.04.202011:58
72-125
0
20
ug/L
02.04.202011:58
65-148
0
20
ug/L
02.04.202011:58
45-150
3
20
ug/L
02.04.202011:58
75-120
1
20
ug/L
02.04.202011:58
55-140
0
20
ug/L
02.04.202011:58
65-135
1
20
ug/L
02.04.202011:58
MS/MSD Percent Recovery [D] = 100*(C-A) / B LCS = Laboratory Control Sample MS = Matrix Spike
Relative Percent Difference RPD = 200* I (C-E) / (C+E) A = Parent Result B = Spike Added
LCS/LCSD Recovery [D] = 100 * (C) / [B] C = MS/LCS Result D = MSD/LCSD % Rec
Log Difference Log Diff. = Log(Sample Duplicate) - Log(Original Sample) E = MSD/LCSD Result
Flag
Page 42 of 60
Final 1.000

QC Summary
650957
XEIVCO
LAF30RATCIRIES
WithersRavenel
520
Judson Church
Rd
Analytical Method:
VOCs by SW-846 8260B
Prep Method:
SW5030B
Seq Number:
3115557
Matrix:
Water
Date Prep:
02.04.2020
MB Sample Id:
7695860-1-BLK
LCS Sample Id:
7695860-1-BKS
LCSD Sample Id: 7695860-1-BSD
Parameter
M B
Spike
LCS LCS
LCSD
LCSD
Limits
%RPD RPD
Units
Analysis Flag
Result
Amount
Result %Rec
Result
%Rec
Limit
Date
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
<0.160
50.0
52.5 105
53.1
106
65-145
1 20
ug/L
02.04.202011:58
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
<0.250
50.0
49.5 99
49.3
99
75-151
0 20
ug/L
02.04.202011:58
Trichloroethylene
<0.190
50.0
50.1 100
50.5
101
70-125
1 20
ug/L
02.04.202011:58
Trichlorofluoromethane
<0.530
50.0
59.4 119
56.7
113
60-145
5 20
ug/L
02.04.202011:58
1,2,3-Trichloropropane
<0.210
50.0
46.9 94
46.6
93
75-125
1 20
ug/L
02.04.202011:58
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene
<0.140
50.0
50.5 101
51.1
102
75-130
1 20
ug/L
02.04.202011:58
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene
<0.170
50.0
50.7 101
50.7
101
75-130
0 20
ug/L
02.04.202011:58
o-Xylene
<0.200
50.0
50.0 100
49.8
100
80-120
0 20
ug/L
02.04.202011:58
m,p-Xylenes
<0.510
100
100 100
99.7
100
75-130
0 20
ug/L
02.04.202011:58
Vinyl Chloride
<0.190
50.0
51.2 102
50.3
101
50-145
2 20
ug/L
02.04.202011:58
Surrogate
MB
MB
LCS
LCS
LCSD
LCSD
Limits Units
Analysis
%Rec
Flag
%Rec
Flag
%Rec
Flag
Date
1,2-Dichloroethane-D4
100
104
102
53-159
%
02.04.202011:58
Toluene-D8
97
98
98
70-130
%
02.04.202011:58
4-Bromofluorobenzene
108
98
99
30-180
%
02.04.202011:58
Analytical Method:
VOCs by SW-846 8260B
Prep Method:
SW5030B
Seq Number:
3115981
Matrix:
Water
Date Prep:
02.06.2020
MB Sample Id:
7696069-1-BLK
LCS Sample Id:
7696069-1-BKS
LCSD Sample Id: 7696069-1-BSD
Parameter
MB
Spike
LCS LCS
LCSD
LCSD
Limits
%RPD RPD
Units
Analysis Fla g
Result
Amount
Result %Rec
Result
%Rec
Limit
Date
Methyl Chloride
<0.250
50.0
42.3 85
41.8
84
40-125
1 20
ug/L
02.06.2020 09:14
o-Xylene
<0.200
50.0
48.3 97
47.5
95
80-120
2 20
ug/L
02.06.2020 09:14
m,p-Xylenes
<0.510
100
98.3 98
97.2
97
75-130
1 20
ug/L
02.06.2020 09:14
Surrogate
MB
MB
LCS
LCS
LCSD
LCSD
Limits Units
Analysis
%Rec
Flag
%Rec
Flag
%Rec
Flag
Date
1,2-Dichloroethane-D4
100
97
97
53-159
%
02.06.2020 09:14
Toluene-D8
94
95
96
70-130
%
02.06.2020 09:14
4-Bromofluorobenzene
98
90
91
30-180
%
02.06.2020 09:14
MS/MSD Percent Recovery
[D] = 100*(C-A) / B
LCS
= Laboratory Control Sample
MS
= Matrix Spike
Relative Percent Difference
RPD = 200*
I (C-E) / (C+E)
A
= Parent Result
B =
Spike Added
LCS/LCSD Recovery
[D] = 100 * (C) / [B]
C
= MS/LCS Result
D =
MSD/LCSD % Rec
Log Difference
Log Diff. = Log(Sample
Duplicate)
- Log(Original Sample)
E
= MSD/LCSD Result
Page 43 of 60
Final 1.000

0
x
6.
D
UD
Q
2 1--
Q
Wo
❑
8
❑
❑Qp
y
.4 E
N
m
G
'S
N 1-
a D
m2
> ti
U)
❑ ❑
a o
❑ o
ti
a 0
❑
N m
pC c
U
ae
m.
06cc
m
Q
E
~
0
ui
ne
m
F
L7
=
z .-
ow a.O
L
m ❑ ¢
CI]
w a
❑
—_
C
Y
d
Q
q
a. �
o=�
a.
NED
� w
L
N a d
w�
E tlY %'
Q
R H
w m
Ci 0
~
Vj
w m
w� u
v
0
p
,;Am
U-z
❑
ar R
co
o
U Q
0 0 w
W L
Q
�. V
R
w u r
in
07 07
� m a
w d
Cn
Lam]
.•r
CI]
y w 4
— O 1
_
saautp4uo3;a jaquanH
¢
n
C
U
e m a
_
4ET
v
00
C m
a
"
�
47
�
❑
(�
�
I
(D
� cfl
R
� N w
m
o
U
U
[
J
CL
CL
f°
a
n
CCJ
JT-
z
I--'
m
m n 'o
CY
m
Q•
Rm �
-IL
b
x
m
m w
�I.
c
0
Z
Z
L7 -
o a
(�+
V
0
O
Cfl
'0 .0
c u_
{
2
Z
COm
5—
3
+
1 n
�•
[17
V7
O
Q
./
�V)
maw
o
t—
JE
[��]
CD cop
m
a mIL a
LLJ
N
..
y
CD
0
_
= E
91
QD
CD
N
Z-
w
0
Q
G
m
z
z
.Q
�'
a
U
N
—
�_
m
0o
Q
f
C
m
2—a
-tea
fl
mLU
s
rn
F
CC
U�
x
Page 44 of 60
Final 1.000

Date/Time:
Subcontractor:
PO#:
Delivery Priority:
Air Bill No.:
Invoice To:
02.03.2020 11:54
Eurofins - Lancaster Laboratories
650957
Sample SUB -Contract#: 57319
Created by: Lourdes Arevalo
[e-mail]; [e-mail]
Date Printed: 02.03.2020 12:03
Send report to: Chad Bechtold
Address: Xenco Laboratories
1412 Tech Blvd.
Tampa, FL 33619
E-Mail: [e-mail]
TAT: Standard
Page 1 of 2
Sample Id
Client Sample Id
Cont #
Matrix
Sample Collection
Method
Method Name
Lab PM
650957-001
SB-3 2.5'
3824
S
01/30/20 10:45
VPH
VPH
Chad Bechtold
650957-002
SB-3 5.0'
3830
S
01/30/20 10:50
VPH
VPH
Chad Bechtold
650957-004
TW-2
3838
w
01/30/20 11:47
VPH
VPH
Chad Bechtold
Subcontractor: Analyze for method and samples specified on COC as requested. Any deviation, must be approved by a Xenco PM.
SUB -Contracting Comments:
"The samples are from North Carolina. Please report to the MDL with "J" values for results between the MDL and RL. Please report in ug/L. Only the
MADEP VPH ranges are needed, not any individual compounds.
Relinquished By: Lourdes Arevalo
Date/ Time Relinquished: 02/03/2020
Relinquished By:
Date/ Time Relinquished:
Received By:
Date/ Time Received:
Received By:
Date/ Time Received:
Cooler Temperature:
Page 45 of 60 Final 1.000

XC�ORIES
Date/Time:
Subcontractor:
PO#:
Delivery Priority:
Air Bill No.:
Invoice To:
02.03.2020 11:54
Eurofins - Lancaster Laboratories
650957
Sample SUB -Contract#: 57319
Created by: Lourdes Arevalo
[e-mail]; [e-mail]
Date Printed: 02.03.2020 12:03
Send report to: Chad Bechtold
Address: Xenco Laboratories
1412 Tech Blvd.
Tampa, FL 33619
E-Mail: [e-mail]
TAT: Standard
Page 2 of 2
Page 46 of 60 Final 1.000

Inter -Office Shipment
IOS Number: 57321
Date/Time:
02.03.2020
Created by:
Lourdes Arevalo
Please send report to:
Chad Bechtold
Lab# From:
Tampa
Delivery Priority:
Address:
Xenco Laboratories
Lab# To:
Houston
Air Bill No.:
777673702232
E-Mail:
[e-mail]
Sample Id
Matrix Client Sample Id
Sample Collection
Method
Method Name
Lab Due
HT Due PM
Analytes
650957-001
S sB-3 2.5'
01.30.2020 10:45
SW6010C
Pb, Cr by SW846 6010C
02.06.2020
07.28.2020 CBE
CR PB
650957-002
S sB-3 5.0'
01.30.2020 10:50
SW6010C
Pb, Cr by SW846 6010C
02.06.2020
07.28.2020 CBE
CR PB
650957-003
W TW-1
01.30.2020 11:00
SW6010C
Pb, Cr by SW846 6010C
02.06.2020
07.28.2020 CBE
CR PB
650957-004
W TW-2
01.30.2020 11:47
SW6010C
Pb, Cr by SW846 6010C
02.06.2020
07.28.2020 CBE
CR PB
650957-005
S sB-115'
01.30.2020 10:30
SW6010C
Pb, Cr by SW846 6010C
02.06.2020
07.28.2020 CBE
CR PB
Inter Office Shipment or Sample Comments:
Relinquished By:
Ricardo Rosario
Date Relinquished: 02.03.2020
Received By:
Shadi Alshrouf
Date Received: 02.04.2020
Cooler Temperature: 3.5
Sign
Page 47 of 60 Final 1.000

CID XENCO Laboratories
X?��N❑RlES
Inter Office Report- Sample Receipt Checklist
Sent To: Houston Acceptable Temperature Range: 0 - 6 degC
IOS #: 57321 Air and Metal samples Acceptable Range: Ambient
Temperature Measuring device used : hou068
Sent By: Lourdes Arevalo Date Sent: 02.03.2020 12.04 PM
Received By: Shadi Alshrouf Date Received: 02.04.2020 09.30 AM
Sample Receipt Checklist
#1 *Temperature of cooler(s)?
3.5
#2 *Shipping container in good condition?
Yes
#3 *Samples received with appropriate temperature?
Yes
#4 *Custody Seals intact on shipping container/ cooler?
Yes
#5 *Custody Seals Signed and dated for Containers/coolers
Yes
#6 *IOS present?
Yes
#7 Any missing/extra samples?
No
#8 IOS agrees with sample label(s)/matrix?
Yes
#9 Sample matrix/ properties agree with IOS?
Yes
#10 Samples in proper container/ bottle?
Yes
#11 Samples properly preserved?
Yes
#12 Sample container(s) intact?
Yes
#13 Sufficient sample amount for indicated test(s)?
Yes
#14 All samples received within hold time?
Yes
* Must be completed for after-hours delivery of samples prior to placing in the refrigerator
Nonconformance:
Corrective Action Taken:
Nonconformance Documentation
Contact: Contacted by : Date:
Checklist reviewed by:
byM- iMiil1118000i1
Shadi Alshrouf
Comments
Page 48 of 60 Final 1.000

tiff eurofins
Lancaster Laboratories
Environmental
2425 New H,11,,d Pike, "A ... t- PA 17601 • 717n56-2300 • Fax: [phone] •—E—F...US.com "-"bsE—
ANALYSIS REPORT
Prepared by: Prepared for:
Eurofins Lancaster Laboratories Environmental Xenco Laboratories
2425 New Holland Pike 4147 Greenbriar Dr
Lancaster, PA 17601 Stafford TX 77477
Report Date: February 13, 2020 12:25
Project: 57319
Account #: 38150
Group Number: 2086106
PO Number: 650957
State of Sample Origin: NC
Electronic Copy To Xenco Laboratories
Electronic Copy To Xenco Laboratories
Attn: Subcontact Xenco
Attn: Chad Bechtold
Respectfully Submitted,
/IV� Z�(�
Nicola L. Maljovec
Manager
[phone]
To view our laboratory's current scopes of accreditation please go to https://www.eurofinsus.com/environment-
testi ng/laboratories/eu rofins-Lancaster-laboratories-environmental/certifications-and-accred itati on s-e u rofi ns-lancaster-laboratories-
environmental/ . Historical copies may be requested through your project manager.
PWgt9 ffffl12 Final 1.000

tiff eurofins
Lancaster Laboratories
Environmental
2425 New H,11,,d Pike, "A ... t- PA 17601 • 717n56-2300 • Fax: [phone] •—E—F...US.com "-"bsE—
SAMPLE INFORMATION
Client Sample Description Sample Collection ELLE#
Date/Time
650957-001 SB-3 2.5' Soil 01/30/2020 10:45 1252328
650957-002 SB-3 5.0' Soil 01/30/2020 10:50 1252329
650957-004 TW-2 Water 01/30/2020 11:47 1252330
The specific methodologies used in obtaining the enclosed analytical results are indicated on the Laboratory
Sample Analysis Record.
PIegV2f&l 2 Final 1.000

,:. eurof ins
Lancaster Laboratories
Environmental
2425 New Holland Pike, Lancaster, PA 17601 . 717f 6.2300 . Fax: [phone] . vrvrx.Ea fina115.co.i"a LabsEn
Sample Description: 650957-001 S13-3 2.5' Soil
57319
Project Name: 57319
Submittal Date/Time: 02/04/2020 11:37
Collection Date/Time: 01/30/2020 10:45
Analysis Report
Xenco Laboratories
ELLE Sample #: SW 1252328
ELLE Group #: 2086106
Matrix: Soil
Dry
CAT
Dry
Method
Dilution
No. Analysis Name CAS Number
Result
Detection Limit
Factor
GC Petroleum MA DEP VPH, Rev. 2.1
mg/kg
mg/kg
Hydrocarbons 2/2018
08765 C5-C8 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons n.a.
N.D.
7.90
143.85
08765 C9-C10 Aromatic Hydrocarbons n.a.
79.1
7.90
143.85
08765 C9-C12 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons n.a.
105
7.90
143.85
Wet Chemistry SM 2540 G-2011
%
%
%Moisture Calc
00111 Moisture n.a.
8.9
0.50
1
Moisture represents the loss in weight of the sample after oven drying
at
103 - 105 degrees Celsius. The moisture result reported is on an
as -received basis.
Laboratory Sample Analysis Record
CAT
Analysis Name
Method Trial#
Batch#
Analysis
Analyst
Dilution
No.
Date and Time
Factor
08765
MA-VPH: Aliphatic/Aromatic
MA DEP VPH, Rev. 2.1 1
200431354A
02/12/2020 19:46
Mark Makowiecki
143.85
2/2018
00388
GC - Field Preserved (MA-VPH)
MA DEP VPH modified 1
202003656078
01/30/2020 10:45
Client Supplied
1
00111
Moisture
SM 2540 G-2011 1
20036820005B
02/06/2020 11:14
Stephanie A Sanchez
1
%Moisture Calc
PIegV 3foT 12 Final 1.000

,:. eurof ins
Lancaster Laboratories
Environmental
2425 New Holland Pike, Lancaster, PA 17601 . 717f 6.2300 . Fax: [phone] . vrvrx.Ea fina115.co.i"a LabsEn
Sample Description: 650957-002 S13-3 5.0' Soil
57319
Project Name: 57319
Submittal Date/Time: 02/04/2020 11:37
Collection Date/Time: 01/30/2020 10:50
Analysis Report
Xenco Laboratories
ELLE Sample #: SW 1252329
ELLE Group #: 2086106
Matrix: Soil
Dry
CAT
Dry
Method
Dilution
No. Analysis Name CAS Number
Result
Detection Limit
Factor
GC Petroleum MA DEP VPH, Rev. 2.1
mg/kg
mg/kg
Hydrocarbons 2/2018
08765 C5-C8 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons n.a.
N.D.
9.10
164.95
08765 C9-C10 Aromatic Hydrocarbons n.a.
N.D.
9.10
164.95
08765 C9-C12 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons n.a.
N.D.
9.10
164.95
Wet Chemistry SM 2540 G-2011
%
%
%Moisture Calc
00111 Moisture n.a.
9.4
0.50
1
Moisture represents the loss in weight of the sample after oven drying
at
103 - 105 degrees Celsius. The moisture result reported is on an
as -received basis.
Laboratory Sample Analysis Record
CAT
Analysis Name
Method Trial#
Batch#
Analysis
Analyst
Dilution
No.
Date and Time
Factor
08765
MA-VPH: Aliphatic/Aromatic
MA DEP VPH, Rev. 2.1 1
200431354A
02/12/2020 20:26
Mark Makowiecki
164.95
2/2018
00388
GC - Field Preserved (MA-VPH)
MA DEP VPH modified 1
202003656078
01/30/2020 10:50
Client Supplied
1
00111
Moisture
SM 2540 G-2011 1
20036820005B
02/06/2020 11:14
Stephanie A Sanchez
1
%Moisture Calc
PWgVRfoc}I)12 Final 1.000

,:. eurof ins
Lancaster Laboratories
Environmental
2425 New Holland Pike, Lancaster, PA 17601 . 717f 6.2300 . Fax: [phone] . vrvrx.E—fina115.co.i"-LabsE—
Sample Description
Project Name:
Submittal Date/Time:
Collection Date/Time
650957-004 TW-2 Water
57319
57319
02/04/2020 11:37
01 /30/2020 11:47
Analysis Report
Xenco Laboratories
ELLE Sample #: WW 1252330
ELLE Group #: 2086106
Matrix: Water
CAT
No. Analysis Name CAS Number
Result
Method
Dilution
Factor
Detection Limit
GC Petroleum MA DEP VPH, Rev. 2.1
ug/I
ug/I
Hydrocarbons 2/2018
08754 C5-C8 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons n.a.
N.D.
50.0
1
08754 C9-C10 Aromatic Hydrocarbons n.a.
N.D.
20.0
1
08754 C9-C12 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons n.a.
N.D.
50.0
1
Due to the need for reanalysis of the sample, the requirement for no
headspace was not met. This analysis was performed from a previously opened
container with headspace.
Laboratory Sample Analysis Record
CAT
Analysis Name
Method Trial# Batch# Analysis
Analyst Dilution
No.
Date and Time
Factor
08754
3 MA VPH Ranges
MA DEP VPH, Rev. 2.1 1 20043A54A 02/13/2020 07:39
Mark Makowiecki 1
2/2018
14977
GC VOA Water Prep
SW-846 5030C 1 20043A54A 02/13/2020 07:38
Mark Makowiecki 1
PMgVbefo6P12 Final 1.000

,:. eurof ins
Lancaster Laboratories
Environmental
Analysis Report
2425 New Holland Pike, Lancaster, PA 17601 • 717f 6.2300 • Fax: [phone] • vrvrx.Ea fina115.co.i"a "bsEn
Quality Control Summary
Client Name: Xenco Laboratories Group Number: 2086106
Reported: 02/13/2020 12:25
Matrix QC may not be reported if insufficient sample or site -specific QC samples were not submitted. In these situations, to demonstrate precision and accuracy at a
batch level, a LCS/LCSD was performed, unless otherwise specified in the method.
All Inorganic Initial Calibration and Continuing Calibration Blanks met acceptable method criteria unless otherwise noted on the Analysis Report.
Method Blank
Analysis Name
Result
MDL
mg/kg
mg/kg
Batch number: 200431354A
Sample number(s):
1252328-1252329
C5-C8 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons
N.D.
2.50
C9-C10 Aromatic Hydrocarbons
N.D.
2.50
C9-C12 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons
N.D.
2.50
ug/I
ug/I
Batch number: 20043A54A
Sample number(s):
1252330
C5-C8 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons
N.D.
50.0
C9-C10 Aromatic Hydrocarbons
N.D.
20.0
C9-C12 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons
N.D.
50.0
LCS/LCSD
Analysis Name
LCS Spike LCS
LCSD Spike
LCSD
LCS
LCSD
LCS/LCSD
RPD
RPD
Added Conc
Added
Conc
%REC
%REC
Limits
Max
mg/kg mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
Batch number: 200431354A
Sample number(s): 1252328-1252329
C5-C8 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons
7.54 7.59
7.54
7.59
101
101
70-130
0
25
C9-C10 Aromatic Hydrocarbons
2.50 2.45
2.50
2.46
98
98
70-130
0
25
C9-C12 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons
7.53 7.20
7.53
7.30
96
97
70-130
1
25
ug/I ug/I
ug/I
ug/I
Batch number: 20043A54A
Sample number(s): 1252330
C5-C8 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons
150.78 174.33
150.78
172.03
116
114
70-130
1
25
C9-C10 Aromatic Hydrocarbons
50.07 50.29
50.07
50.41
100
101
70-130
0
25
C9-C12 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons
150.53 151.35
150.53
152.72
101
101
70-130
1
25
Batch number: 20036820005B
Sample number(s): 1252328-1252329
Moisture
89.5 89.44
100
99-101
*- Outside of specification
(1) The result for one or both determinations was less than five times the LOQ.
(2) The unspiked result was more than four times the spike added.
PWgV0f&12 Final 1.000

,:. eurof ins
Lancaster Laboratories
Environmental
Analysis Report
2425 New Holland Pike, Lancaster, PA 17601 • 717f 6.2300 • Fax: [phone] • vrvrx.E—fina115.co.i"-"bsE—
Client Name: Xenco Laboratories
Reported: 02/13/2020 12:25
Quality Control Summary
Group Number: 2086106
Surrogate Quality Control
Surrogate recoveries which are outside of the QC window are confirmed unless
attributed to dilution or otherwise noted on the Analysis Report.
Analysis Name: 3 MA VPH Ranges
Batch number: 20043A54A
Trifluorotoluene-P Trifluorotoluene-F
1252330
93
99
Blank
94
96
LCS
95
97
LCSD
94
97
Limits:
70-130
70-130
Analysis Name: MA-VPH: Aliphatic/Aromatic
Batch number: 20043B54A
Trifluorotoluene-P
Trifluorotoluene-F
1252328
96
101
1252329
103
109
Blank
99
104
LCS
103
105
LCSD
100
104
Limits: 70-130 70-130
*- Outside of specification
(1) The result for one or both determinations was less than five times the LOQ.
(2) The unspiked result was more than four times the spike added.
PWgP?fffl12 Final 1.000

n
Date/Time:
Subcontractor:
PO#:
Delivery Priority:
Air Bill No.:
Invoice To:
02.03.2020 11:54
Eurofins - Lancaster Laboratories
650957
Sample SUB -Contract#: 57319
Created by: Lourdes Arevalo
[e-mail]; [e-mail]
Date Printed: 02.03.2020 12:03
Send report to: Chad Bechtold
Address: Xenco Laboratories
1412 Tech Blvd.
Tampa, FL 33619
E-Mail: [e-mail]
TAT: Standard
Page 1 of 2
Sample Id
Client Sample Id
Cont #
Matrix
Sample Collection
Method
Method Name
Lab PM
650957-001
SB-3 2.5'
3824
S
01/30/20 10:45
VPH
VPH
Chad Bechtold
650957-002
SB-3 5.0'
3830
S
01/30/20 10:50
VPH
VPH
Chad Bechtold
650957-004
TW-2
3838
W
01/30/20 11:47
VPH
VPH
Chad Bechtold
Subcontractor: Analyze for method and samples specified on COC as requested. Any deviation, must be approved by a Xenco PM.
SUB -Contracting Comments:
"The samples are from North Carolina. Please report to the MDL with "J" values for results between the MDL and RL. Please report in ug/L. Only the
MADEP VPH ranges are needed, not any individual compounds.
Relinquished By: Lourdes Arevalo
Date/ Time Relinquished: 02/03/2020
Relinquished By:
Date/ Time Relinquished:
Received By:
Date/ Time Received: '
Received By:
Date/ Time Received:
D
Cooler Temperature: I' G
PP%VVT12
Final 1.000

Date/Time:
Subcontractor:
PO#:
Delivery Priority:
Air Bill No.:
Invoice To:
02.03.2020 11:54
Eurofins - Lancaster Laboratories
650957
Sample SUB -Contract#: 57319
Created by: Lourdes Arevalo
[e-mail]; [e-mail]
Date Printed: 02.03.2020 12:03
Send report to: Chad Bechtold
Address: Xenco Laboratories
1412 Tech Blvd.
Tampa, FL 33619
E-Mail: [e-mail]
TAT: Standard
Page 2 of 2
A
Final 1.000

eurofins
Lancaster Laboratories
Environmental
Client: XENCO
Sample Administration
Receipt Documentation Log
Doc Log ID: 274422
1 111111 11111 11111 111 11 11111 11111 1111 111)
Group Number(s):
�Dut-06
Delivery and Receipt Information
Delivery Method: Fed Ex Arrival Date: 02/04/2020
Number of Packages: 1 Number of Projects: 1
Arrival Cond
Shipping Container Sealed:
Yes
Custody Seal Present:
No
Samples Chilled:
Yes
Paperwork Enclosed:
Yes
Samples Intact:
Yes
Missing Samples:
No
Extra Samples:
No
Discrepancy in Container Qty on COC:
No
ition Summary
Sample IDs on COC match Containers:
Sample Date/Times match COC:
Total Trip Blank Qty: 0
Air Quality Samples Present:
Yes
Yes
No
Unpacked by Julissa Rivera -Santa
Samples Chilled Details
Thermometer Types: DT = Digital (Temp. Bottle) IR = Infrared (Surface Temp) All Temperatures in °C.
Cooler # Thermometer ID Corrected Temp
1 192050133 1.7
Therm. Type Ice Type Ice Present? Ice Container Elevated Temp?
IR Wet Y Loose N
Page 1 of 1 2425 New Holland Pike T 717-656-2300
LanciwthA 1s7 }5-2425 Final 1.000 F 717-656-2681
� �'(12 www1ancasterl-abs.com

tiff eurofins
Lancaster Laboratories Environmental Explanation of Symbols and Abbreviations
The following defines common symbols and abbreviations used in reporting technical data:
BMQL
Below Minimum Quantitation Level
mL
milliliter(s)
C
degrees Celsius
MPN
Most Probable Number
cfu
colony forming units
N.D.
non -detect
CP Units
cobalt-chloroplatinate units
ng
nanogram(s)
F
degrees Fahrenheit
NTU
nephelometric turbidity units
g
gram(s)
pg/L
picogram/liter
IU
International Units
RL
Reporting Limit
kg
kilogram(s)
TNTC
Too Numerous To Count
L
liter(s)
Ng
microgram(s)
lb.
pound(s)
pL
microliter(s)
m3
cubic meter(s)
umhos/cm
micromhos/cm
meq
mill iequivalents
MCL
Maximum Contamination Limit
mg
milligram(s)
<
less than
>
greater than
ppm parts per million - One ppm is equivalent to one milligram per kilogram (mg/kg) or one gram per million grams. For
aqueous liquids, ppm is usually taken to be equivalent to milligrams per liter (mg/1), because one liter of water has a weight
very close to a kilogram. For gases or vapors, one ppm is equivalent to one microliter per liter of gas.
ppb parts per billion
Dry weight Results printed under this heading have been adjusted for moisture content. This increases the analyte weight
basis concentration to approximate the value present in a similar sample without moisture. All other results are reported on an
as -received basis.
Analytical test results meet all requirements of the associated regulatory program (i.e., NELAC (TNI), DoD, and ISO 17025) unless
otherwise noted under the individual analysis.
Measurement uncertainty values, as applicable, are available upon request.
Tests results relate only to the sample tested. Clients should be aware that a critical step in a chemical or microbiological analysis is the
collection of the sample. Unless the sample analyzed is truly representative of the bulk of material involved, the test results will be
meaningless. If you have questions regarding the proper techniques of collecting samples, please contact us. We cannot be held
responsible for sample integrity, however, unless sampling has been performed by a member of our staff.
This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of the laboratory.
Times are local to the area of activity. Parameters listed in the 40 CFR Part 136 Table II as "analyze immediately" are not performed within
15 minutes.
WARRANTY AND LIMITS OF LIABILITY - In accepting analytical work, we warrant the accuracy of test results for the sample as submitted.
THE FOREGOING EXPRESS WARRANTY IS EXCLUSIVE AND IS GIVEN IN LIEU OF ALL OTHER WARRANTIES, EXPRESSED OR
IMPLIED. WE DISCLAIM ANY OTHER WARRANTIES, EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING A WARRANTY OF FITNESS FOR
PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND WARRANTY OF MERCHANTABILITY. IN NO EVENT SHALL EUROFINS LANCASTER LABORATORIES
ENVIRONMENTAL, LLC BE LIABLE FOR INDIRECT, SPECIAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR INCIDENTAL DAMAGES INCLUDING, BUT NOT
LIMITED TO, DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF PROFIT OR GOODWILL REGARDLESS OF (A) THE NEGLIGENCE (EITHER SOLE OR
CONCURRENT) OF EUROFINS LANCASTER LABORATORIES ENVIRONMENTAL AND (B) WHETHER EUROFINS LANCASTER
LABORATORIES ENVIRONMENTAL HAS BEEN INFORMED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES. We accept no legal
responsibility for the purposes for which the client uses the test results. No purchase order or other order for work shall be accepted by
Eurofins Lancaster Laboratories Environmental which includes any conditions that vary from the Standard Terms and Conditions, and
Eurofins Lancaster Laboratories Environmental hereby objects to any conflicting terms contained in any acceptance or order submitted by
client.
F9911511°I° �2 Final 1.000

euirofins
Lancaster Laboratories Data Qualifiers
Environmental
Qualifier
Definition
C
Result confirmed by reanalysis
D1
Indicates for dual column analyses that the result is reported from column 1
D2
Indicates for dual column analyses that the result is reported from column 2
E
Concentration exceeds the calibration range
K1
Initial Calibration Blank is above the QC limit and the sample result is ND
K2
Continuing Calibration Blank is above the QC limit and the sample result is ND
K3
Initial Calibration Verification is above the QC limit and the sample result is ND
K4
Continuing Calibration Verification is above the QC limit and the sample result is ND
J (or G, I, X)
Estimated value — the Method Detection Limit (MDL or DL) and < the Limit of Quantitation (LOQ or RL)
P
Concentration difference between the primary and confirmation column >40%. The lower result is reported.
P^
Concentration difference between the primary and confirmation column > 40%. The higher result is reported.
U
Analyte was not detected at the value indicated
V
Concentration difference between the primary and confirmation column >100%. The reporting limit is raised
due to this disparity and evident interference.
W
The dissolved oxygen uptake for the unseeded blank is greater than 0.20 mg/L.
Z
Laboratory Defined - see analysis report
Additional Organic and Inorganic CLIP qualifiers may be used with Form 1 reports as defined by the CLP methods.
Qualifiers specific to Dioxin/Furans and PCB Congeners are detailed on the individual Analysis Report.
Rea
Paaa "I ! R 12 Final 1.000