24010 Yandle Witherspoon Environmental Management Plan 20210811

Via Email
August 11, 2021 NCDEQ – Division of Waste Management Brownfields Program 1646 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1646 Attn: Mr. Bill Schmithorst, PG
Re: Environmental Management Plan Yandle-Witherspoon Supply, Inc. Charlotte, North Carolina Brownfields Project No. 24010-20-060 H&H Project No. WPP-014
Dear Bill: On behalf of WP Yandle, LLC, please find the enclosed Environmental Management Plan
(EMP) prepared for the above referenced Site. The EMP has been prepared based on results of previous assessment activities and the planned redevelopment of the Brownfields property. Should you have any questions or need additional information, please do not hesitate to contact us at [phone].

Sincerely,
Hart & Hickman, PC
Haley Martin, PG Ralph McGee, PG Project Geologist Project Manager
Enclosure cc: Mr. Jay Levell, White Point Partners (Via Email) Mr. Chris Walker, Alexander Ricks (Via Email)

Environmental Management Plan

Yandle-Witherspoon Supply, Inc.
N. Brevard Street and Belmont Avenue
Charlotte, North Carolina
Brownfields Project No. 24010-20-060
H&H Job No. WPP-014 August 11, 2021

#C-1269 Engineering
#245 Geology

Environmental Management Plan
Yandle-Witherspoon Supply, Inc.
Charlotte, North Carolina
Brownfields Project No. 24010-20-060
H&H Job No. WPP-014

Table of Contents
Completed EMP Template Form

List of Tables

Table 1 Summary of Soil Analytical Results
Table 2 Summary of Groundwater Analytical Results
Table 3 Summary of Surface Water Analytical Results
Table 4 Summary of Sediment Analytical Results
Table 5 Summary of Soil Gas Analytical Results

List of Figures

Figure 1 Site Location Map
Figure 2 Site and Historical Sample Location Map
Figure 3 Sample Location Map
Figure 4 Compound Concentration Map
Figure 5 In-Situ Soil Sample Compound Concentration Map

List of Appendices

Appendix A Site & Civil Plans
Appendix B Grading Plan and Cut-Fill Analysis
Appendix C Historical Analytical Data
Appendix D Brownfields Soil Management Options Letter
Appendix E Reeves and Old 27 LCID Landfill Background Soil Sample Data

1 
EMP Version 2, January 2021  
NORTH CAROLINA BROWNFIELDS PROGRAM 
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN 

This form is to be used to prepare an Environmental Management Plan (EMP) for projects in 
the North Carolina Brownfields Program at the direction of a Brownfields project manager. 

The EMP is a typical requirement of a Brownfields Agreement (BFA).  Its purpose is to clarify 
actions to be taken during the demolition and construction at Brownfields properties in an 
effort to avoid delays in the event of the discovery of new contamination sources or other 
environmental conditions.  The EMP provides a means to document redevelopment plans and 
environmental data for each applicable environmental medium to inform regulatory‐compliant 
decision‐making at the site.  As much detail as possible should be included in the EMP, 
including contingency planning for unknowns.  Consult your project manager if you have 
questions. 

Prospective Developers and/or their consultants must complete and submit this form and all 
pertinent attachments, see checklist below, to their Brownfields project manager prior to any 
earthmoving or other development‐related activities that have the potential to disturb soil at 
the Brownfields Property, including demolition.  For the resultant EMP to be valid for use, it 
must be completed, reviewed by the program, signed by all parties working on the project, 
and approved by the Brownfields project manager.  Failure to comply with the requirements of 
the EMP could jeopardize project eligibility, or in the event of a completed agreement, be 
cause for a reopener.   

The EMP is valid only for the scope of work described herein and must be updated to be 
applicable for new phases of redevelopment or after significant changes in applicable 
regulatory guidance.   

Voluntary Metrics Tab The NC Brownfields Program updates estimated capital investment (from the Brownfields Property Application) and estimated jobs created (from the Brownfields Agreement) whenever possible. As a voluntary measure, you may opt to complete the below information for capital
investment and jobs created as estimated by your final redevelopment plans for the Brownfields Property:
1. Estimated capital investment in redevelopment project: Click or tap here to enter text.
2. Estimated jobs created:
a. Construction Jobs:
b. Full Time Post-Redevelopment Jobs: Click or tap here to enter text.

2 
EMP Version 2, January 2021  
Table of Contents
NORTH CAROLINA BROWNFIELDS PROGRAM ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN ........................... 1 
GENERAL INFORMATION ........................................................................................................................ 4 
COMMUNICATIONS ................................................................................................................................ 4 
NOTIFICATIONS TO THE BROWNFIELDS PROGRAM ............................................................................... 5 
REDEVELOPMENT PLANS ........................................................................................................................ 6 
CONTAMINATED MEDIA ......................................................................................................................... 7 
PART 1. Soil ......................................................................................................................................... 8 
PART 2. GROUNDWATER .................................................................................................................. 21 
PART 3. SURFACE WATER .................................................................................................................. 24 
PART 4. SEDIMENT ............................................................................................................................ 26 
PART 5.  SOIL VAPOR ......................................................................................................................... 27 
PART 6.  SUB‐SLAB SOIL VAPOR ........................................................................................................ 28 
PART 7. INDOOR AIR ......................................................................................................................... 29 
VAPOR INTRUSION MITIGATION SYSTEM ............................................................................................. 30 
CONTINGENCY PLAN – encountering unknown tanks, drums, or other waste materials ..................... 30 
POST‐REDEVELOPMENT REPORTING ..................................................................................................... 32 
APPROVAL SIGNATURES ....................................................................................................................... 34 

3 
EMP Version 2, January 2021  
So that the EMP provides value in protecting brownfields eligibility and public health, the 
preparer shall ensure that the following steps have been completed prior to submitting the 
EMP for review.  Any EMP prepared without completing these steps is premature.   

☒ Site sampling and assessment that meets Brownfields’ objectives is complete and has 
been reviewed and approved by the Brownfields Project Manager. 

☒ Brownfields objectives at the date of the signing of this EMP are to begin construction 
activities in accordance with EMP requirements. Specific redevelopment plans, even if 
conceptual, have been developed for the project, submitted and reviewed by the 
Brownfields Project Manager.  

Please submit, along with the completed EMP form, the following attachments, as relevant 
and applicable to the proposed redevelopment:      

☒ A set of redevelopment plans, including architectural/engineering plans, if available; if 
not conceptual plans may suffice if updated when detailed plans are drafted. 

☒ A figure overlaying redevelopment plans on a map of the extent of contamination for 
each media. 

☒ Site grading plans that include a cut and fill analysis. 

☐ A figure showing the proposed location and depth of impacted soil that would remain 
on site after construction grading. 

☐ Any necessary permits for redevelopment (i.e. demolition, etc.). 

☒ A detailed construction schedule that includes timing and phases of construction. 

☒ Tabulated data summaries for each impacted media (i.e. soil, groundwater, soil gas, 
etc.) applicable to the proposed redevelopment. 

☒ Figures with the sampling locations and contamination extents for each impacted media 
applicable to the proposed redevelopment. 

☐ A full final grade sampling and analysis plan, if the redevelopment plan is final. 

☐ If known, information about each proposed potential borrow soil source, such as aerial 
photos, historic site maps, historic Sanborn maps, a site history, necessary for 
brownfields approval. 

☐ Information and, analytical data if required, for quarries, or other borrow sources, 

4 
EMP Version 2, January 2021  
detailing the type of material proposed for importation to the Brownfields Property. 

☐ A work plan for the sampling and analysis of soil to be brought onto the Brownfields 
Property.  Refer to Issue Resolution 15 in Brownfields Program Guidelines. 

☒ A map of the Brownfields Property showing the location of soils proposed for export 
and sampling data from those areas. 

☒ If a Vapor Mitigation System is required by the Brownfields Program, the Vapor 
Intrusion Mitigation System (VIMS) plan will be signed and sealed by a NC Professional 
Engineer.  The VIMS Plan may also be submitted under separate cover. 

GENERAL INFORMATION 

Date: 8/11/2021 Revision Date (if applicable): Click or tap to enter a date. 

Brownfields Assigned Project Name: Yandle‐Witherspoon Supply, Inc 

Brownfields Project Number: 24010‐20‐060 

Brownfields Property Address: N. Brevard Street and Belmont Avenue, Charlotte, Mecklenburg County 

Brownfields Property Area (acres): The Brownfields property consists of five contiguous parcels 
(Mecklenburg County Parcel Identification Nos. 08104102, 08104103, 08104105, 08104201, and 
08104203), the alleyway between parcels 08104203 and 08104102, and land located between the 
Seaboard Coastline railroad and parcel 08104102 (no street address or parcel ID number available).  
Collectively, the property totals approximately 6.75 acres of land.  A Site location map is provided as 
Figure 1, and the Site and surrounding area are shown in Figure 2.  
Is Brownfields Property Subject to RCRA Permit?.......................☐ Yes   ☒ No 
If yes enter Permit No.: Click or tap here to enter text. 
Is Brownfields Property Subject to a Solid Waste Permit….……..☐ Yes   ☒ No 
If yes, enter Permit No.: Click or tap here to enter text. 

COMMUNICATIONS 

A copy of this EMP shall be distributed to all the parties below as well as any contractors or site workers 
that may be exposed to site vapors, soil, groundwater, and/or surface water.  Additionally, a copy of the 
EMP shall be maintained at the Brownfields Property during redevelopment activities.  NOTE, THE EMP 
DOES NOT TAKE THE PLACE OF A SITE‐SPECIFIC HEALTH AND SAFETY PLAN. 

Prospective Developer: WP Yandle, LLC   
Contact Person: Mr. Jay Levell  

5 
EMP Version 2, January 2021  
Phone Numbers:   Office: 704‐412‐7112 Mobile: 704‐906‐4776   
Email: [e-mail]   

Contractor for PD: TBD    
Contact Person: Click or tap here to enter text. 
Phone Numbers:   Office: Click or tap here to enter text. Mobile: Click or tap here to enter text.   
Email: Click or tap here to enter text.    

Environmental Consultant: Hart & Hickman, PC    
Contact Person: Ms. Haley Martin  
Phone Numbers:   Office: 704‐526‐2045 Mobile: Click or tap here to enter text.   
Email: [e-mail]   

Brownfields Program Project Manager:  Mr. Bill Schmithorst  
Phone Numbers:   Office: 919‐707‐8159 Mobile: 919‐441‐3606   
Email: [e-mail]   

Other DEQ Program Contacts (if applicable, i.e., UST Section, Inactive Hazardous Site Branch, 
Hazardous Waste, Solid Waste):  
Billy Meyer  
DEQ DSCA Program  
[e-mail] 
919‐707‐8366 

NOTIFICATIONS TO THE BROWNFIELDS PROGRAM  

Written advance Notification Times to Brownfields Project Manager: Check each box to accept 
minimum advance notice periods (in calendar days) for each type of onsite task: 

On‐site assessment or remedial activities:……………………………………….…… 10 days Prior        ☒ 

Construction or grading start:……………………………………….………………………. 10 days Prior       ☒

Discovery of stained soil, odors, USTs, buried drums or waste, landfill, or other signs of previously 
unknown contamination: ……………………………….……………………………………. Within 48 hours   ☒

Implementation of emergency actions (e.g. dewatering, flood or soil erosion control measures in 
area of contamination, ventilation of work zones):…………….……….……… Within 48 hours  ☒ 

Installation of mitigation systems:………………………….………………….……….. 10 days Prior         ☒

Other notifications as required by local, state or federal agencies to implement redevelopment 
activities: (as applicable): ……………………….…………………………………………..… Within 30 days     ☒ 

6 
EMP Version 2, January 2021  
REDEVELOPMENT PLANS 

1) Type of Redevelopment (check all that apply): 
☒Residential  ☐Recreational  ☐Institutional  ☒Commercial  ☒Office  ☒Retail  ☐Industrial 
☐Other specify: 
Proposed redevelopment plans for the Site include razing of existing buildings and construction 
of a high‐density multi‐family residential apartment complex and a multi‐story commercial/retail 
office building.  Redevelopment activities also include grading for installation of an above ground 
open‐air parking deck, access roads, landscaped areas, courtyards, and a swimming pool. 

2) Check the following activities that will be conducted prior to commencing earth‐moving activities 
at the site: 
☒ Review of historic maps (Sanborn Maps, facility maps) 
☐ Conducting geophysical surveys to evaluate the location of suspect UST, fuel lines, utility 
lines, etc. 
☐ Interviews with employees/former employees/facility managers/neighbors 

3) Summary of Redevelopment Plans (MANDATORY: attach detailed plans or conceptual plans, if 
detailed plans are not available. EMP review without such information would be premature): 
 Provide brief summary of redevelopment plans, including demolition, removal of building 
slabs/pavement, grading plans and planned construction of new structures:  
The Site is currently developed with one industrial warehouse building and one commercial 
office building.  The buildings will be demolished prior to redevelopment activities.  Following 
demolition, the Brownfields property will be cleared and graded for construction of a multi‐
family residential apartment complex, commercial/retail/office building, and an above ground 
open‐air parking deck.  Redevelopment activities also include installation of subsurface utilities 
and grading for installation of new paved access drives and landscaped areas.  A copy of the 
most recent Site Plan prepared for the redevelopment of the Brownfields property is included in 
Appendix A. 

4) Do plans include demolition of structure(s)?: 
   ☒ Yes  ☐ No ☐ Unknown  
☒ If yes, please check here to confirm that demolition will be conducted in accordance with 
applicable legal requirements, including without limitation those related to lead and asbestos 
abatement that are administered by the Health Hazards Control Unit within the Division of Public 
Health of the North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services.  If available, please 
provide a copy of your demolition permit.  

5) Are sediment and erosion control measures required by federal, state, or local regulations? 
  ☒ Yes    ☐ No    ☐ Unknown  
☒  If yes, please check here to confirm that demolition will be conducted in accordance with 
applicable legal requirements.  If soil disturbance is necessary to install sediment and erosion 
control measures, they may not begin until this EMP is approved.  

7 
EMP Version 2, January 2021  

6) Which category of risk‐based screening level is used or is anticipated to be specified in the 
Brownfields Agreement?  Note: If children frequent the property, residential screening levels shall 
be cited in the Brownfields Agreement for comparison purposes. 
☒ Residential   ☒ Non‐Residential or Industrial/Commercial 

7) Schedule for Redevelopment (attach construction schedule): 
a) Construction start date: 9/1/2021 

b) Anticipated duration (specify activities during each phase):  
Start of grading activities and utility installation is scheduled to begin in September 2021.  
Grading and construction activities are estimated to last 18 to 24 months.  The 
redevelopment is estimated to be completed and occupied by September 2023. 

c) Additional phases planned? ☐ Yes  ☒ No   

  If yes, specify the start date and/or activities if known:  
Start Date:  Click or tap to enter a date. 
  Planned Activity: 
There are no plans for additional phases of redevelopment.   

Start Date:  Click or tap to enter a date. 
  Planned Activity: 
Click or tap here to enter text. 

Start Date: Click or tap to enter a date. 
  Planned Activity: 
Click or tap here to enter text. 

d) Provide the planned date of occupancy for new buildings: 9/1/2023

CONTAMINATED MEDIA 
Please fill out the sections below, using detailed site plans, if available, or estimate using known areas 
of contaminated soil and a conceptual redevelopment plan.  Provide a figure overlaying new 
construction onto figure showing contaminated soil and groundwater locations. 

1) Contaminated Media on the Brownfields Property 
Part 1. Soil:……………………………………….……………. ☒  Yes   ☐ No   ☐ Suspected  ☐ Unknown 
Part 2. Groundwater:.……………………….……..……. ☒  Yes   ☐ No   ☐ Suspected  ☐ Unknown 
Part 3. Surface Water:.……………...……..…………… ☒  Yes   ☐ No   ☐ Suspected  ☐ Unknown 
Part 4. Sediment:.……………...……..…………………… ☒  Yes   ☐ No   ☐ Suspected  ☐ Unknown 
Part 5. Soil Vapor:…..…………...……..…………………. ☐  Yes   ☒ No   ☐ Suspected  ☐ Unknown 
Part 6. Sub‐Slab Soil Vapor:……...……..…………….. ☐  Yes   ☒ No   ☐ Suspected  ☐ Unknown 

8 
EMP Version 2, January 2021  
Part 7. Indoor Air:...……..…………………………………. ☐  Yes   ☐ No   ☐ Suspected  ☒ Unknown 

2) For the Area of Proposed Redevelopment on the Brownfields Property, attach tabulated data 
summaries for each impacted media and figure(s) with sample locations.  

PART 1. Soil 
1) Known or suspected contaminants in soil (list general groups of contaminants): 
Eleven (11) soil samples were collected in northwestern and south‐central portions of the 
Brownfields property in April 2021 during Brownfields Assessment activities completed to 
evaluate the potential for impacts associated with a former on‐Site underground storage tank 
(UST) and, former paint storage area, and in‐situ soil characterization soil samples were collected 
in areas proposed for cut that will generate excess soil during grading that cannot be re‐used on‐
Site.  In addition, two (2) composite soil samples and two (2) grab samples (CS‐05/CS05A and CS‐
06/CS‐06A) were collected from a soil stockpile located in the eastern portion of the Site by 
Terracon Consultants, Inc. in October 2018.  A tabular summary of the soil analytical data 
collected in 2018 is provided in Appendix C, and the soil sample locations are depicted in Figure 
2.  

A tabular summary of soil analytical data collected in April 2021 in comparison to the June 2021 
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) Inactive Hazardous Sites Branch 
(IHSB) Preliminary Soil Remediation Goals (PSRGs) is included as Table 1.  The April 2021 UST and 
paint storage related soil sample locations are shown in Figure 3, and in‐situ soil sample locations 
are shown in Figure 5.  Compound concentrations exceeding PSRGs during the April 2021 
sampling event are shown in Figure 4 and Figure 5.  A brief summary of the results is provided 
below: 

Volatile Organic Compounds 
Low levels of toluene (up to 0.0051 J milligrams per kilogram [mg/kg]) were detected in soil 
samples SB‐3 (0‐2 ft), EX‐2 (0‐2 ft), EX‐3 (4‐5 ft) and EX‐5 (0‐2 ft), but at concentrations below the 
DEQ IHSB Residential PSRGs.  The “J” flag designation indicates the compound was detected at a 
concentration above the laboratory method detection limits but below the laboratory reporting 
limits, resulting in a laboratory estimated concentration.  In addition, low levels of n‐
butylbenzene (0.0074 mg/kg), ethylbenzene (0.0043 J mg/kg), naphthalene (0.0191 J mg/kg), 
1,2,4‐trimethylbenene (0.0169 mg/kg), m&p‐xylene (0.0114 J mg/kg), and o‐xylene (0.0057 J 
mg/kg) were detected in soil sample EX‐3 (4‐5 ft), but at concentrations below the DEQ IHSB 
Residential PSRGs.  Low levels of the VOCs chloroform (0.0021 J mg/kg) and naphthalene (0.0032 
J mg/kg) in soil sample CS‐05A at concentrations well below the DEQ IHSB PSRGs.  No other VOCs 
were detected at concentrations above laboratory method detection limits in the soil samples 
collected at the Site. 

Semi‐Volatile Organic Compounds 
Laboratory analytical results indicated the presence of the polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon 

9 
EMP Version 2, January 2021  
(PAH) benzo(a)pyrene (0.141 J mg/kg) in sample EX‐1 (0‐5 ft) slightly above the IHSB Residential 
PSRG of 0.11 mg/kg.  The PAHs benzo(a)anthracene (1.43 mg/kg), benzo(a)pyrene (1.23 mg/kg), 
benzo(b)fluoranthene (1.45 mg/kg), and dibenzo(a,h)anthracene (0.251 J mg/kg) were detected 
in sample CS‐06, collected from the soil stockpile in the eastern portion of the Site, at 
concentrations above the DEQ IHSB Residential PSRGs.   

Sample EX‐1 (0‐5 ft) also contained concentrations of benzo(a)anthracene (0.178 mg/kg), 
benzo(b)fluoranthene (0.203 J mg/kg), fluoranthene (0.310 J mg/kg), phenanthrene (0.181 J 
mg/kg) and pyrene (0.283 J mg/kg), all below the DEQ IHSB Residential PSRGs.  Stockpile sample 
CS‐06 also contained concentrations of acenaphthene (0.886 mg/kg), anthracene (0.823 mg/kg), 
benzo(k)fluoranthene (0.631 mg/kg), benzo(g,h,i)perylene (0.711 mg/kg), chrysene (1.12 mg/kg), 
dibenzofuran (0.318 J mg/kg), fluoranthene (2.89 mg/kg), fluorene (0.5 mg/kg), ideno(1,2,3‐
cd)pyrene (0.697 mg/kg), 2‐methylnaphthalene (0.132 J mg/kg), naphthalene (0.526 mg/kg), 
phenanthrene (3.07 mg/kg) and pyrene (2.43 mg/kg), all below the DEQ IHSB Residential PSRGs.  
The PAH fluoranthene (0.320 J mg/kg) was detected in soil samples CS‐05 at a concentration well 
below the DEQ Residential PSRG of 480 mg/kg.  No other SVOCs were detected above laboratory 
method detection limits in any other samples collected at the Site.   

Metals 
Laboratory analytical results indicate that several metals were detected at concentrations above 
the laboratory method detection limits.  The metal arsenic (up to 7.19 mg/kg) was detected in 
each soil sample at a concentration above the DEQ IHSB Residential PSRG of 0.68 mg/kg, but the 
results are consistent with published background concentrations for North Carolina soils and are 
considered naturally occurring. 

Hexavalent chromium (up to 2.04 mg/kg) was detected at a concentration above the DEQ IHSB 
Residential PSRG of 0.31 mg/kg and above naturally occurring background levels in deeper soil 
sample SB‐1 (8‐10 ft).  Elevated hexavalent chromium concentrations are limited to deeper soil in 
the vicinity of the former UST basin and are not considered widespread in Site soil based on 
results of soil assessment activities. 

Additional metals, including barium, trivalent chromium, lead, mercury, and selenium, were 
detected in soil samples collected at the Site at concentrations consistent with background data 
for the Site area and published background levels for North Carolina soils. 

2) Depth of known or suspected contaminants (feet): 
As noted above, benzo(a)pyrene and hexavalent chromium were detected at concentrations 
above the DEQ IHSB PSRGs in shallow soil sample EX‐1 (0‐5 ft) and deeper soil sample EX‐1 (8‐10 
ft bgs), respectively.  In addition, several PAHs are present at levels above PSRGs in northeastern 
portion of a soil stockpile staged in the eastern portion of the Site. 

3) Area of soil disturbed by redevelopment (square feet): 
Based on the preliminary grading plans and cut‐fill analysis (Appendix B), the entire Site is 

10 
EMP Version 2, January 2021  
expected to be cleared and graded (approximately 154,000 square feet) to level the Site for 
redevelopment.  A copy of the preliminary grading plan and cut‐fill analysis is provided as 
Appendix B. 

4) Depths of soil to be excavated (feet): 
Based on review of the cut‐fill analysis, planned cut depths are expected to range from 
approximately 1 to 8 ft bgs in in the vicinity of the proposed apartment complex and multi‐story 
open‐air parking deck.  Other discrete areas may include deeper excavations for installation of 
deeper foundational footers, elevator banks, utility banks, etc.  Remaining portions of the Site 
are planned for fill to achieve final grade elevations. 

5) Estimated volume of soil (cubic yards) to be excavated (attach grading plan): 
Cut‐fill analysis and calculations indicate that the total volume of soil to be excavated and/or cut 
is approximately 7,400 cubic yards.  In addition, limited excavations for installation of new 
utilities will be completed during redevelopment of the Site.   

6) Estimated volume of excavated soil (cubic yards) anticipated to be impacted by contaminants:             
Based on a review of the preliminary grading plan and soil sample analytical results, less than 
2,000 cubic yards of excavated soil is anticipated to be impacted by contaminants.   

7) Estimated volume of contaminated soil expected to be disposed of offsite, if applicable:   
Based on review of the grading plan and cut‐fill analysis, up to 7,400 cubic yards of excess soil 
may need to be transported off‐Site.  Soil samples collected within in‐situ soil characterization 
section EX‐1 located in the northern portion of the Site identified benzo(a)pyrene (0.141 J mg/kg) 
at a concentration slightly above the DEQ IHSB Residential PSRG.  No other compounds were 
detected at concentrations above the DEQ IHSB PSRGs or background levels in the case of metals 
in areas of planned cut that will generate excess soil. 

Based on review of the grading plan and cut‐fill analysis, up to 2,000 cubic yards of stockpiled 
soils may need to be transported off‐Site.  Soil samples collected from the eastern portion of the 
stockpile contained benzo(a)anthracene (1.43 mg/kg), benzo(a)pyrene (1.23 mg/kg), 
benzo(b)fluoranthene (1.45 mg/kg), and dibenzo(a,h)anthracene (0.251 J mg/kg) at 
concentrations above the DEQ IHSB Residential PSRGs.  No other compounds were detected at 
concentrations above the DEQ IHSB PSRGs or background levels in the case of metals (see 
Appendix C) in the stockpiled soils.  DEQ Brownfields provided export approval options for the 
soil stockpile in a letter dated October 31, 2018.  A copy of the DEQ provided Brownfields Soil 
Management Options letter is included in Appendix D for ease of reference.   

If potentially impacted soil is encountered and cannot be reused on‐Site as fill, it will be sampled 
and managed in accordance with the procedures described in the following sections.   

Part 1.A. MANAGING ONSITE SOIL 
If soil is anticipated to be excavated from the Brownfield Property, relocated on the Brownfields 

11 
EMP Version 2, January 2021  
Property, or otherwise disturbed during site grading or other redevelopment activities, please 
provide a grading plan that clearly illustrates areas of cut and fill (approximate areas & volumes are 
acceptable, if only preliminary data available).   

1) HAZARDOUS WASTE DETERMINATION:  
a) Does the soil contain a LISTED WASTE as defined in the North Carolina Hazardous 
Waste Section under 40 CFR Part 261.31‐261.35?....................................... ☐Yes   ☒No 
☐ If yes, explain why below, including the level of knowledge regarding processes 
generating the waste (include pertinent analytical results as needed). 
Click or tap here to enter text. 

☐ If yes, do the soils exceed the “Contained‐Out” levels in Attachment 1 of the 
North Carolina Contained‐In Policy?................................................. ☐ Yes   ☒ No 

b) NOTE: IF SOIL MEETS THE DEFINITION OF A LISTED HAZARDOUS WASTE AND EXCEEDS 
THE CONTAINED‐OUT LEVELS IN ATTACHMENT 1 TO THE NORTH CAROLINA 
CONTAINED‐IN POLICY THE SOIL MAY NOT BE RE‐USED ON SITE AND MUST BE 
DISPOSED OF IN ACCORDANCE WITH DEQ HAZARDOUS WASTE SECTION RULES AND 
REGULATIONS.    
c)  Does the soil contain a CHARACTERISTIC WASTE?.................................... ☐ Yes   ☒ No 
☐ If yes, mark reason(s) why below (and include pertinent analytical results). 
☐ Ignitability  Click or tap here to enter text.               
☐ Corrosivity Click or tap here to enter text. 
☐ Reactivity Click or tap here to enter text. 
☐ Toxicity Click or tap here to enter text. 
☐ TCLP results Click or tap here to enter text. 
☐ Rule of 20 results (20 times total analytical results for an individual 
hazardous constituent on TCLP list cannot, by test method, exceed regulatory 
TCLP standard)   
Click or tap here to enter text. 

☒ If no, explain rationale:  
Total chromium was detected at concentrations greater than 100 mg/kg in April 
2021 soil samples EX‐3, SB‐1, SB‐2/SB‐DUP, and SB‐4.  No other compounds were 
detected at concentrations exceeding the TCLP criteria using the Rule of 20. 

H&H requested that the lab analyze soil samples EX‐3, SB‐1, SB‐2/SB‐DUP, and 
SB‐4 for TCLP chromium and results of analysis indicate that chromium was not 
detected at concentrations above the laboratory method detection limits in any 

12 
EMP Version 2, January 2021  
of the soil samples.  Based on results of soil assessment activities and TCLP 
analysis, no compounds have been identified at characteristically hazardous 
levels. 

d) NOTE: IF SOIL MEETS THE DEFINITION OF A CHARACTERISTIC HAZARDOUS WASTE, THE 
SOIL MAY NOT BE RE‐USED ON SITE AND MUST BE DISPOSED OF IN ACCORDANCE 
WITH DEQ HAZARDOUS WASTE SECTION RULES AND REGULATIONS. 

2) Screening criteria by which soil disposition decisions will be made (e.g., left in place, capped in 
place with low permeability barrier, removed to onsite location and capped, removed offsite): 
      ☒ Preliminary Health‐Based Residential SRGs  
      ☒ Preliminary Health‐Based Industrial/Commercial SRGs  
           ☒ Division of Waste Management Risk Calculator (For Brownfields Properties Only) 
    ☐ Site‐specific risk‐based cleanup level. Please provide details of methods used for 
determination/explanation.  
Click or tap here to enter text. 

Additional comments:  
Click or tap here to enter text. 

3) If known impacted soil is proposed to be reused within the Brownfields Property Boundary, 
please check the measures that will be utilized to ensure safe placement and documentation of 
same.   Please attach a proposed location diagram/site map.      
☒ Provide documentation of analytical report(s) to Brownfields Project Manager 
☒ Provide documentation of final location, thickness and depth of relocated soil on site map 
to Brownfields Project Manager once known 
☐ Geotextile to mark depth of fill material.  
Provide description of material:  
Click or tap here to enter text. 

☒ Manage soil under impervious cap ☒  or clean fill ☒  
☒ Describe cap or fill:  
Documented impacted soils will be covered with impervious surfaces (asphalt pavement, 
sidewalks, access roads, buildings, etc.) or a minimum of 2 ft of demonstrably clean fill 
during redevelopment.  

☒ Confer with NC BF Project Manager if Brownfield Plat must be revised (or re‐recorded if 
actions are Post‐Recordation).         
☒ GPS the location and provide site map with final location. 
☐ Other. Please provide a description of the measure:  
  Click or tap here to enter text. 

13 
EMP Version 2, January 2021  

4) Please describe the following action(s) to be taken during and following excavation and 
management of site soils: 
Management of fugitive dust from site 
☒ Yes, describe the method will include: 
Significant areas of contaminated soil are not expected to be encountered or disturbed 
during future Site redevelopment activities based upon previous soil sampling data and field 
screening during previous assessment activities.  However, the grading contractor will take 
into account conditions such as wind speed, wind direction, and moisture content of soil 
during soil grading and stockpiling activities to minimize dust generation.  Particular 
attention will be paid by contractors to implement dust control measures as needed based 
on Site and atmospheric conditions (i.e., by controlled water application, hydro‐seeding, 
and/or mulch, stone, or plastic cover). 

☐ No, explain rationale: 
Click or tap here to enter text. 

Field Screening of site soil 
☒ Yes, describe the field screening method, frequency of field screening, person conducting 
field screening:  
During soil disturbance at the Site, the workers and/or contractors will observe soils for 
evidence of potential significantly impacted soil.  Evidence of potential impacted soil 
includes a distinct unnatural color, strong odor, or filled or previously disposed materials of 
concerns (i.e., chemicals, tanks, drums, etc.).  Should the above be noted during Site work, 
the contractor will contact the project environmental engineer to observe the suspect 
condition.  If the project environmental engineer confirms that the material may be 
impacted, then the procedures below will be implemented.  In addition, the environmental 
engineer will contact the DEQ Brownfields project manager within 48‐hours to advise that 
person of the condition. 

☐ No, explain rationale:    
Click or tap here to enter text. 

Soil Sample Collection 
☐ Yes, describe the sampling method (e.g., in‐situ grab, composite, stockpile, etc.):  
Click or tap here to enter text. 

☒ No, explain rationale:  
Collection of additional soil samples is not anticipated based on results of previous Site 
assessment activities.  If previously unknown significant soil impact is encountered 
during grading and/or installation or removal of utilities, excavation will proceed only as 
far as needed to allow grading and/or construction of the utility to continue and/or only 
as far as needed to allow alternate corrective measures described below.                                
Suspect impacted soil excavated during grading and/or utility line installation or removal 

14 
EMP Version 2, January 2021  
may be stockpiled and covered in a secure area to allow construction to progress.  
Suspect impacted soil will be underlain by and covered with minimum 10‐mil plastic 
sheeting.  At least one representative soil sample (no less than 3 aliquot soil samples) at 
a sample ratio of 1 soil sample per every approximately 1,000 cubic yards of soil will be 
collected for the analyses selected below (i.e., total VOCs, SVOCs, and RCRA metals plus 
hexavalent chromium).  If the soil sample laboratory analytical results indicate that the 
soil could potentially exceed toxicity characteristic hazardous waste criteria, then the soil 
will also be analyzed by TCLP for those compounds that could exceed the toxicity 
characteristic hazardous waste criteria.                                                                                             
Impacted soil will be managed in the manner described below based upon the laboratory 
analyses:                                                                                                                                                   
i. If no organic compounds are detected in a sample (other than which are 
attributable to sampling or laboratory artifacts) and metals are below the Protection of 
Groundwater or Residential PSRG (whichever is lower for the detected compounds) and 
are consistent with Site‐specific background levels with acceptable cumulative risk 
calculator results, then the soil will be deemed suitable for use as on‐Site fill or as off‐Site 
fill.  The proposed location(s) for off‐Site placement of soil (other than a permitted 
facility) along with the receiving facility’s written approval for acceptance of the soil will 
be provided to DEQ for approval prior to taking the soil off‐Site.                                                 
ii.         If detectable levels of compounds are found which do not exceed the DEQ IHSB 
Residential PSRGs (other than which are attributable to sampling or laboratory artifacts 
or which are consistent with Site‐specific background levels for metals), the TCLP 
concentrations are below hazardous waste criteria, and cumulative risk calculator results 
are acceptable, then the soil may be used on‐Site as fill without conditions.                            
iii. If detectable levels of compounds are found which exceed the DEQ IHSB 
Residential PSRGs (other than which are attributable to sampling or laboratory artifacts 
or which are consistent with background levels for metals) and the TCLP concentrations 
are below hazardous waste criteria, then the soil, with DEQ written approval, may be 
used on‐Site as fill below an impervious surface, or at least 2 ft of documented 
compacted clean soil.  If the impacted soil with concentrations above Residential PSRGs 
is moved to an on‐Site location, its location and depth will be documented, and its 
location will be provided to DEQ                                                                                                         
iv. Impacted soil may be transported to a Brownfields approved permitted facility 
such as a landfill or landfarm provided that the soil is accepted at the disposal facility.  If 
soil is transported to a permitted facility, the permitted facility’s written approval or 
acceptance to dispose of soil from the Site will be included with the final redevelopment 
report.  In the unlikely event that the sample data indicates concentrations above TCLP 
hazardous waste criteria, then the soil must be transported off‐Site to a permitted 
disposal facility that can accept or treat hazardous waste.                                                            
*Please note that should the PD elect to transport export soil to a permitted facility or to 
a DEQ Brownfields pre‐approved receiving facility, soil will be direct loaded onto trucks 
for transport off‐Site. 

If soil samples are collected for analysis, please check the applicable chemical analytes: 
☒ Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by EPA Method 8260 

15 
EMP Version 2, January 2021  
☒ Semi‐volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) by EPA Method 8270 
☒ Metals RCRA List (8) (arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium, mercury, lead, selenium 
and silver): Specify Analytical Method Number(s): 
EPA Methods 6020/7471

☐ Pesticides: Specify Analytical Method Number(s):  
Click or tap here to enter text.

☐ PCBs: Specify Analytical Method Number(s):  
Click or tap here to enter text.

☒ Other Constituents & Respective Analytical Method(s) (i.e. Hexavalent Chromium, 
Herbicides, etc.): Specify Analytical Method Number(s): 
Hexavalent Chromium by EPA Method 7199

☒ Check to confirm that stockpiling of known or suspected impacted soils will be conducted 
in accordance with Figure 1 of this EMP.  Stockpile methodology should provide erosion 
control, prohibiting contact between surface water/precipitation and contaminated soil, 
and preventing contaminated runoff.  Explain any variances or provide additional details as 
needed: 

☒ Final grade sampling of exposed native soil (i.e., soil that will not be under buildings or 
permanent hardscape). Select chemical analyses for final grade samples with check boxes 
below (Check all that apply): 
☒ Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by EPA Method 8260 
☒ Semi‐volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) by EPA Method 8270 
☒ Metals RCRA List (8) (arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium, mercury, lead, 
selenium and silver): Specify Analytical Method Number(s): 
EPA Methods 6020/7471

☐ Pesticides: Specify Analytical Method Number(s):    
Click or tap here to enter text.

☐ PCBs: Specify Analytical Method Number(s):  
Click or tap here to enter text.

☒ Other Constituents & Respective Analytical Method(s) (i.e. Hexavalent 
Chromium, Herbicides, etc.):  
Hexavalent Chromium by EPA Method 7199

Please provide a scope of work for final grade sampling, including a diagram of soil 
sampling locations, number of samples to be collected, and brief sampling methodology.  
Samples should be collected from 0‐2 ft below ground surface, with the exception of VOCs 
which should be taken from 1‐2 ft below ground surface.  Alternatively, indicate if a work 
Click or tap here to enter text. 

16 
EMP Version 2, January 2021  
plan for final grade sampling may be submitted under separate cover. 
Following completion of soil disturbance for future Site development (i.e., after grading 
and utility construction), an environmental engineer will assess the Site for areas that will 
not be covered upon completion of the redevelopment with a minimum of 2 ft of 
demonstrably clean fill soil, building foundations, sidewalks, asphalt or concrete parking 
areas and driveways, or other similar impervious areas (e.g., tightly spaced pavers or 
bricks).  If such areas exist, a Work Plan will be prepared for final grade soil sampling for 
DEQ Brownfields review and approval. 

Based on the current Site redevelopment plan, one final grade soil sample will be collected 
for laboratory analysis for each approximately 100 ft of linear landscape area or every 
approximately 1,000 sq ft of open area.   

☐ If final grade sampling was NOT selected, please explain rationale: 
Click or tap here to enter text. 

Part 1.B. IMPORTED FILL SOIL 

NO SOIL MAY BE BROUGHT ONTO THE BROWNFIELDS PROPERTY WITHOUT PRIOR APPROVAL 
FROM THE BROWNFIELDS PROGRAM.  According to the Brownfields IR 15, “Documenting 
imported soil (by sampling, analysis, and reporting in accordance with review and written 
approval in advance by the Brownfields Program), will safeguard the liability protections provided 
by the brownfields agreement and is in the best interest of the prospective developer/property 
owner.” 

Requirements for importing fill: 

1) Will fill soil be imported to the site?................................................ ☒ Yes  ☐ No  ☐ Unknown 

2) If yes, what is the estimated volume of fill soil to be imported?  
Based on conversations with the PD and the available grading plans, approximately 6,800 cubic 
yards of fill will need to be imported to the Site to achieve final grade elevations. 

3) If yes, what is the anticipated depth that fill soil will be placed at the property? (If a range 
of depths, please list the range.) 
In general, fill areas associated with the proposed redevelopment are located in the northern and 
eastern portions of the Site (Appendix B).  The thickness of the fill ranges from approximately 1 ft 
to 14 ft.  

4) Provide the source of fill, including: location, site history, nearby environmental concerns, 
etc. Attach aerial photos, maps, historic Sanborn maps and a borrow source site history: 
For import soil needed during grading activities, the procedures outlined in Part 1.B. Section 7 
below will be followed to demonstrate import soil meets acceptable standards applicable to the 
Site.   

17 
EMP Version 2, January 2021  

5) PRIOR TO ITS PLACEMENT AT THE BROWNFIELDS PROPERTY, provide a plan to analyze fill 
soil to demonstrate that it meets acceptable standards applicable to the site and can be 
approved for use at the Brownfields property. 
The PD plans to import limited amounts of virgin organic rich topsoil from a commercial 
landscape material vendor for use in proposed landscaped areas.  The PD does not plan to collect 
samples of landscaping materials prior to placement at the Site.  In addition, the PD may use 
limited amounts of lime or cement as an amending agent for drying soil as needed during 
grading and redevelopment activities.  The PD does not plan to collect samples of lime or 
concrete used as an amending agent prior to use at the Site. 

For import soil needed during grading activities, the procedures outlined in Part 1.B. Section 7 
below will be followed to demonstrate import soil meets acceptable standards applicable to the 
Site.   

6) Please check the applicable chemical analytes for fill soil samples.  (Check all that apply): 
☒ Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by EPA Method 8260 
☒ Semi‐volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) by EPA Method 8270 
☒ Metals RCRA List (8) (arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium, mercury, lead, 
selenium and silver): Specify Analytical Method Number(s): 
EPA Methods 6020/7471

☐ Pesticides: Specify Analytical Method Number(s):    
Click or tap here to enter text.

☐ PCBs: Specify Analytical Method Number(s):  
Click or tap here to enter text.

☒ Other Constituents & Respective Analytical Method(s) (i.e. Hexavalent 
Chromium, Herbicides, etc.):  
Hexavalent Chromium by EPA Method 7199

7) The scope of work for import fill sampling may be provided below or in a Work Plan 
submitted separately for DEQ review and approval.  Attach specific location maps for in‐situ 
borrow sites.  If using a quarry, provide information on the type of material to be brought 
onto the Brownfields Property. 
The PD will follow the procedures outlined below to demonstrate import soil meets acceptable 
standards applicable to the Site, if necessary. 

If the PD plans to import fill material from Vulcan Materials Company quarry located near 
Pineville, NC, or from the Martin Marietta quarry located on Beatties Ford Road in Charlotte, NC, 
no samples of the import material will be collected as adequate analytical data is available in the 
DEQ Brownfields database to demonstrate material from these facilities is suitable for use as 
structural fill at a Brownfields property. 

18 
EMP Version 2, January 2021  
If fill soil is obtained from an off‐Site property that is not a Brownfields pre‐approved quarry or is 
recycled material from the Vulcan Materials Company quarry or the Martin Marietta quarries, a 
sampling plan will be developed and submitted for DEQ review.  DEQ approval of the sampling 
plan and analytical results will be obtained prior to transporting import soil to the Site. 

The specific sampling rate will be outlined in the aforementioned sampling plan.  However, if the 
proposed borrow source has not been previously developed (i.e., virgin land), soil samples will be 
collected for laboratory analyses indicated above at a general rate of one per 1,000 cubic yards 
which will contain 3‐5 composite aliquot locations and one grab location.  If the proposed borrow 
source is a permitted quarry that has not been pre‐approved by DEQ Brownfields (e.g., Martin 
Marietta quarry located on Arrowood Road in Charlotte, NC), one composite soil sample 
consisting of 3‐5 composite aliquot locations and one grab location will be collected for the 
laboratory analyses indicated above. 

Fill soil will be considered suitable for use at the Site if it does not contain compound 
concentrations above DEQ IHSB Residential PSRGs, DWM Risk Calculator risk thresholds, or typical 
metals concentrations which are consistent with levels identified in the Site area. 

Part 1.C. EXPORTED SOIL 

NO SOIL MAY LEAVE THE BROWNFIELDS PROPERTY WITHOUT APPROVAL FROM THE 
BROWNFIELDS PROGRAM.  FAILURE TO OBTAIN APPROVAL MAY VIOLATE A BROWNFIELDS 
AGREEMENT CAUSING A REOPENER OR JEOPARDIZING ELIGIBILITY IN THE PROGRAM, 
ENDANGERING LIABILITY PROTECTIONS AND MAKING SAID ACTION POSSIBLY SUBJECT TO 
ENFORCEMENT.  JUSTIFICATIONS PROVIDED BELOW MUST BE APPROVED BY THE PROGRAM IN 
WRITING PRIOR TO COMPLETING TRANSPORT ACTIVITIES.  Please refer to Brownfields IR 15 for 
additional details.  

1) If export from a Brownfields Property is anticipated, please provide details regarding the 
proposed export actions.  Volume of exported soil, depths, location from which soil will 
be excavated on site, related sampling results, etc. Provide a site map with locations of 
export and sampling results included. 
Based on review of the grading plan and cut‐fill analysis, up to approximately 7,400 cubic yards 
of geotechnically unsuitable soil and up to approximately 2,000 cubic yards of stockpiled soil may 
need to be transported off‐Site.  The soil stockpile may be transported off‐Site in accordance 
with the Brownfields Soil Management Options letter provided by DEQ on October 31, 2018 or 
may be reused in fill areas of the Site during redevelopment activities.  

H&H completed in‐situ soil sampling in areas of planned cut where excess soil will be generated 
that cannot be re‐used on‐Site as fill due to geotechnical conditions.  In situ soil characterization 
sampling was completed in accordance with the DEQ‐approved Brownfields Assessment Work 
Plan dated April 6, 2021.  The assessment included collection of seven (7) soil samples (EX‐1 

19 
EMP Version 2, January 2021  
through EX‐7) for laboratory analysis to identify areas of planned cut at the Site that do not have 
compound concentrations in soil above DEQ IHSB Protection of Groundwater or Residential 
PSRGs (whichever is lower) so that soil can be direct loaded onto trucks and transported off‐Site 
during grading activities. 

In‐situ soil sampling results identified benzo(a)pyrene (0.141 J mg/kg) at a concentration slightly 
above the DEQ IHSB Residential PSRG in soil characterization section EX‐1 located in the northern 
portion of the Site (Figure 5).  No other compounds were detected at concentrations above the 
DEQ IHSB PSRGs or background levels in the case of metals in the EX‐1 soil characterization 
section.  No compounds were detected at concentrations above the DEQ IHSB PSRGs or 
background levels in the case of metals in the other in situ soil characterization sections (EX‐2 
through EX‐7).  The locations of in situ soil samples and in situ soil characterization sections are 
shown with an overlay of the cut/fill analysis map in Figure 5, and a tabular summary of the in 
situ soil sample analytical results is included as Table 1. 

Export soil generated during grading within in situ soil characterization section EX‐1 will be re‐
used on‐Site as fill (if possible), transported to a Municipal Solid Waste landfill such as the 
Republic Services facility in Concord, NC, or with DEQ prior written approval, to another 
Brownfields property in need of import soil.  Written approval from the receiving facility will be 
obtained and provided to DEQ prior to transporting the soil off‐Site.  

Export soil generated during grading within in situ soil characterization sections EX‐2 through 
EX‐7 will be direct loaded and transported to the Reeves Land Clearing and Inert Debris (LCID) 
Landfill or to the Old 27 LCID Landfill, or with DEQ prior written approval, other LCID and 
Construction & Demolition (C&D) landfills with similar background metals concentrations, or to 
other Brownfields property(s) in need of import soil.  A tabular summary of metals 
concentrations detected in soil characterization sections EX‐2 through EX‐7 in comparison to 
background metals concentrations detected in soil samples collected at the Reeves and Old 27 
LCID landfill facilities is provided in Appendix E.  The laboratory analytical reports and chain of 
custody records for background soil samples collected at the Reeves and Old 27 LCID landfill 
facilities are also provided in Appendix E.   

Should additional export be required outside of the in situ soil characterization sections, the 
following sampling plan will be implemented.  Prior to transporting the soil off‐Site, a sampling 
plan will be developed and submitted to DEQ Brownfields for review and approval.  Generally, 
soil samples will be collected from export soil at a rate of one sample per every 1,000 cubic yards 
of export material which will include a minimum of three combined composite locations and one 
grab location.  Export soil sampling may be conducted in‐situ prior to the onset of grading and an 
In Situ Soil Characterization Assessment Work Plan will be provided to DEQ for review and 
approval. 

DEQ approval of the sampling plan, sampling locations, and analytical results will be obtained 

20 
EMP Version 2, January 2021  
prior to transporting the additional export soil from the Site.  Based on analytical results of soil 
samples collected from the export soil, the soil will be transported off‐Site to a suitable location.  
The PD will notify DEQ Brownfields of the location receiving the export soil.  If not a permitted 
facility, DEQ Brownfields approval and written approval from the receiving facility will be 
obtained prior to transporting the soil off‐Site.   

2) To what type of facility will the export Brownfields soil be sent?  
☒ Subtitle D/Municipal Solid Waste Landfill (analytical program to be determined by 
landfill) 
☒ Permitted but Unlined Landfill (i.e. LCID, C&D, etc.) Analytical program to be 
determined by the accepting Landfill;  
☒ Landfarm or other treatment facility  
☒ Use as fill at another suitable Brownfields Property – determination that a 
site is suitable will require, at a minimum, that similar concentrations of the same or 
similar contaminants already exist at both sites, use of impacted soil will not increase 
the potential for risk to human health and the environment at the receiving Brownfields 
property, and that a record of the acceptance of such soil from the property owner of 
the receiving site is provided to Brownfields.  Please provide additional details below.  
☒ Use as Beneficial Fill off‐site at a non‐Brownfields Property ‐ Please provide 
documentation of approval from the property owner for receipt of fill material.  This will 
also require approval by the DEQ Solid Waste Section.  Additional information is 
provided in IR 15.  Please provide additional details below.  

3) Additional Details: (if transfer of soil to another property is requested above, please provide 
details related to the proposed plans). 
As noted above, prior to exporting additional soil not characterized as part of in situ soil 
sampling completed in April 2021 and described above, the environmental engineer will contact 
DEQ Brownfields to obtain DEQ Brownfields and DEQ Solid Waste approval prior to exporting 
soil to a non‐Brownfields property or non‐permitted disposal facility.   

Part 1.D. MANAGEMENT OF UTILITY TRENCHES 

☐ Install liner between native impacted soils and base of utility trench before filling with clean fill 
(Preferred) 

☒ Last out, first in principle for impacted soils (if soil can safely be reused onsite and is not a 
hazardous waste), i.e., impacted soils are placed back at approximately the depths they 
were removed from such that impacted soil is not placed at a greater depth than the original 
depth from which it was excavated. 

☐ Evaluate whether necessary to install barriers in conduits to prevent soil vapor transport, 
and/or degradation of conduit materials due to direct impact with contaminants? 

21 
EMP Version 2, January 2021  
☐ If yes, provide specifications on barrier materials or provide the results of this evaluation in the 
Vapor Mitigation Plan. Note that if vapor mitigation is planned for site buildings, utility 
corridors will need to be evaluated as part of mitigation designs: 
Click or tap here to enter text. 

☒ If no, include rationale here: 
Results of soil gas assessment activities completed within the footprint of the proposed 
apartment and office buildings indicate that no compounds are present at concentrations that 
pose unacceptable vapor intrusion risks on the Brownfields property.  However, chlorinated 
solvent impacts were discovered in groundwater in the northern portion of the Site.  Note that 
the PD plans to install a passive vapor intrusion mitigation system during construction of the 
apartment and office buildings.  

☐ Unknown, details to be provided in the Vapor Mitigation Plan for site buildings 

Other comments regarding managing impacted soil in utility trenches:  
The contractor and workers will observe soil for potential impacts during utility installation activities. 
Evidence of potential significant impacted soil includes a distinct unnatural color, strong odor, or filled 
or previously disposed materials of concerns (i.e., chemicals, tanks, drums, etc.).  Should the above be 
noted during utility work, the contractor will contact the project environmental engineer to observe 
the suspect condition.  If the project environmental engineer confirms that the material may be 
impacted, then the procedures outlined in Managing On‐Site Soil above will be implemented.  In 
addition, the environmental engineer will contact the DEQ Brownfields project manager within 48‐
hours to advise that person of the condition. 

Should impacted soil be discovered during utility trenching activities, appropriate safety screening will 
be performed to protect workers during utility installation activities.  Safety screening activities 
include monitoring the worker breathing zone with a calibrated photoionization detector or similar 
instrument at all times when in utility trenches.  If safety screening results indicate further action is 
warranted, the work zone will be evacuated until appropriate engineering controls (such as use of 
industrial fans) are implemented. 

PART 2. GROUNDWATER  

1) What is the depth to groundwater at the Brownfields Property? 
During groundwater assessment activities completed in April 2021, the depth to groundwater 
was measured at a depth ranging from approximately 10 ft bgs in lower lying areas in the 
northern portion of the Brownfields property to approximately 19 ft bgs at higher elevations 
located in the western portions of the Brownfields property.  

2) Is groundwater known to be contaminated by ☐onsite  ☐offsite   ☒both or ☐unknown 
sources?  Describe source(s):  
Historical groundwater assessment at the Brownfields property included collection of seventeen 
(17) groundwater samples for laboratory analysis.  Recent groundwater assessment at the 

22 
EMP Version 2, January 2021  
Brownfields property included collection of two (2) groundwater samples for laboratory analysis.  
In addition, nine (9) monitoring wells were installed and sampled in the eastern portion of the 
Site at the former Gay Laundry and Cleaners facility (1101 N. Brevard Street) on behalf of the 
Dry‐cleaning Solvent Cleanup Act (DSCA) Program.  Locations of select historical groundwater 
samples are shown in Figure 2 and locations of recent groundwater samples are shown in Figure 
3.  A tabular summary of recent groundwater sample laboratory analytical results is included as 
Table 2.  Historical groundwater analytical data is provided as Appendix C.  Compound 
concentrations exceeding DEQ NCAC 15A 2L Groundwater Quality Standards (2L Standards) 
and/or the DEQ Division of Waste Management (DWM) Vapor Intrusion Groundwater Screening 
Levels (GWSLs) during the most recent sampling event are shown in Figure 4.  A brief summary of 
the groundwater assessment results is provided below. 

Volatile Organic Compounds 
Groundwater sample results indicate that tetrachloroethylene (PCE) was detected in 
groundwater in the western and northern portions of the Site at concentrations ranging from 
0.72 micrograms per liter (µg/L) to 35 µg/L, which exceed the 2L Standard of 0.7 µg/L and/or the 
DEQ DWM Vapor Intrusion Residential and Non‐Residential GWSLs of 12 µg/L and 48 µg/L, 
respectively.  The chlorinated compound trichloroethylene (TCE) was also detected in 
groundwater samples collected in the northern and western portions of the Site at 
concentrations ranging from 3.5 µg/L in the western portion of the Site (SLGW‐9) to 37 µg/L in 
the northern portion of the Site (SLGW‐16), which exceed the 2L Standard of 3 µg/L and the DEQ 
DMW Residential and/or Non‐Residential Vapor Intrusion GWSLs of 1.0 µg/L and 4.4 µg/L.  The 
VOC chloroform (up to 3.8 µg/L) was also detected in a groundwater sample collected in the 
eastern portion of the Site (GW‐07) at a concentration above the DEQ DWM Residential and 
Non‐Residential GWSLs of 0.81 µg/L and 3.6 µg/L, respectively.   

The chlorinated solvents PCE and TCE were also detected in the eastern portion of the Site (1101 
N. Brevard Street) during assessment activities performed under the preview of the DSCA 
Program.  During the most recent groundwater monitoring event in 2009, PCE (up to 1.8 µg/L) 
was detected at concentrations above the 2L Standard in monitoring wells (MW‐2, MW‐3, and 
MW‐4) installed downgradient of the former Gay Laundry facility.  TCE (up to 0.70 J µg/L) was 
also detected in groundwater samples collected downgradient of the former Gay Laundry facility, 
but at concentrations below the 2L Standard.  Note that the release incident associated with the 
former Gay Laundry facility was issued a No Further Action letter by the DSCA Program on 
August 30, 2010 after analytical data and statistical analysis indicated that the solvent plume was 
stable to decreasing and vapor intrusion risks were below the unacceptable threshold criteria.   

The VOCs acetone, benzene, 2‐butanone, chlorobenzene, 1,1‐dichloroethene, 1,2‐
dichlorobenzene, cis‐1,2‐dichloroethene, 1,2‐dichloropropane, ethylbenzene,4‐methyl‐2‐
pentanone, 2‐hexanone, styrene, toluene, and xylenes were also detected in groundwater 
samples collected at the Site at concentrations above the laboratory method detection limits, 
but well below the 2L Standards and the DEQ DWM Vapor Intrusion GWSLs.  No other organic 
compounds were detected in Site groundwater at concentrations above the laboratory method 
detection limits. 

Semi‐Volatile Organic Compounds 
No SVOCs were detected at concentrations above the laboratory method detection limits in 

23 
EMP Version 2, January 2021  
groundwater samples collected at the Brownfields property.   

Metals 
During assessment activities conducted in 2001 and 2016, groundwater sample results indicate 
that arsenic (up to 14.7 µg/L) and cadmium (up to 17 µg/L) were detected in groundwater at the 
Site at concentrations above the 2L Standards of 10 µg/L and 2 µg/L.  Groundwater analytical 
results also indicate that chromium (up to 282 µg/L), lead (up to 74.6 µg/L), and selenium (up to 
27 µg/L) were detected at concentrations above the 2L Standards of 10 µg/L, 15 µg/L, and 20 
µg/L, respectively.   

It is of note that the environmental reports prepared for the Site attribute the elevated metals 
concentrations to high turbidity in the groundwater samples collected in 2001 and 2016.  Filtered 
groundwater samples collected at the Site in November 2016 and the most recent groundwater 
sampling data (unfiltered samples) did not detect dissolved metals concentrations above the 2L 
Standards.  

3) What is the direction of groundwater flow at the Brownfields Property?  
Shallow groundwater is expected to mimic surface topography which slopes generally northwest 
and northeast toward a tributary of Little Sugar Creek generally located along the northwestern 
and northeastern Site boundaries (Figure 1).    

4) Will groundwater likely be encountered during planned redevelopment activities?   
☐Yes    ☒No  
If yes, describe these activities: 
Shallow groundwater was encountered approximately 10 to 19 ft bgs during recent groundwater 
assessment activities conducted at the Brownfields property.  Grading activities are expected to 
result in a net import at the Site and will not result in decreased surface elevations in areas were 
shallow groundwater may be encountered.  Proposed fill depths range from 1 to 10 ft.  The 
deepest trenches for utility installations are proposed for 5 ft bgs following grading.  Therefore, 
encountering groundwater during redevelopment activities is not anticipated at this time. 

Regardless of the answer; in the event that contaminated groundwater is encountered 
during redevelopment activities (even if no is checked above), list activities for contingent 
management of groundwater (e.g., dewatering of groundwater from excavations or 
foundations, containerizing, offsite disposal, discharge to sanitary sewer, NPDES permit, or 
sampling procedures).  
Appropriate worker safety measures will be undertaken if groundwater gathers in an open 
excavation within an area determined to be impacted during construction activities.  The 
accumulated water will be allowed to evaporate/infiltrate to the extent time for dissipation 
does not disrupt the construction schedule.  Should the time needed for natural dissipation of 
accumulated water be deemed inadequate, an environmental professional will be contacted 
and the water will be tested and disposed off‐Site (if impacted), or tested and discharged to the 
storm sewer (if not impacted above DEQ surface water standards) in accordance with applicable 
municipal and State regulations for erosion control and construction stormwater control. 

5) Are monitoring wells currently present on the Brownfields Property?.................☐Yes   ☒No    
If yes, are any monitoring wells routinely monitored through DEQ or other 

24 
EMP Version 2, January 2021  
agencies?..................................................................................................................☐Yes   ☐No  

6) Please check methods to be utilized in the management of known and previously 
unidentified wells.   
☐ Abandonment of site monitoring wells in accordance with all applicable regulations.  It 
is the Brownfields Program’s intent to allow proper abandonment of well(s) as 
specified in the Brownfields Agreement, except if required for active monitoring 
through another section of DEQ or the EPA.   
☐ Location of existing monitoring wells marked 
☐ Existing monitoring wells protected from disturbance  
☒ Newly identified monitoring wells will be marked and protected from further 
disturbance until notification to DEQ Brownfields can be made and approval for 
abandonment is given. 

7) Please provide additional details as needed:   

Please note, disturbance of existing site monitoring wells without approval by DEQ is not 
permissible.  If monitoring wells are damaged and/or destroyed, DEQ may require that the PD 
be responsible for replacement of the well.   

PART 3. SURFACE WATER 
1) Is surface water present at the property?  ☒ Yes ☐ No ☐ Unknown 
2) Attach a map showing the location of surface water at the Brownfields Property. 
3) Is surface water at the property known to be contaminated? ☒ Yes  ☐ No 
4) Will workers or the public be in contact with surface water during planned redevelopment 
activities?    ☐ Yes  ☒ No 
5) In the event that contaminated surface water is encountered during redevelopment 
activities, or clean surface water enters open excavations, list activities for management of 
such events (e.g., flooding, contaminated surface water run‐off, stormwater impacts): 
An unnamed tributary of Little Sugar Creek is present along the northwestern and northeastern 
Brownfields property boundaries.  Redevelopment activities that include disturbance to the 
unnamed tributary are not anticipated at this time. 

In December 2000, September 2016, and April 2021, a total of nine (9) surface water samples 
were collected at the Site from upgradient, mid‐gradient, and downgradient portions of the 
unnamed tributary of Little Sugar Creek.  Locations of historical surface water samples are shown 
in Figure 2, and locations of recent surface water samples are shown in Figure 3.  A tabular 
An inactive water supply well is located along the southern Site boundary.  The water supply well will 
be abandoned in accordance with all applicable regulations prior to redevelopment.   

The PD is not aware of existing active monitoring wells located on the Brownfields property.  DEQ will 
be notified if newly identified monitoring wells are found on the Brownfields property  

25 
EMP Version 2, January 2021  
summary of recent surface water sample laboratory analytical results is included as Table 3.  
Historical surface water analytical data is provided as Appendix C.  Compound concentrations 
exceeding DEQ NCAC 15A 2B Surface Water Standards (2B Standards) during the most recent 
April 2021 sampling event are shown in Figure 4.  A brief summary of the surface water 
assessment results is provided below. 

Volatile Organic Compounds 
Surface water sample results indicate that PCE was detected in surface water in upgradient, mid‐
gradient, and downgradient portions of the unnamed tributary at concentrations ranging from 
14.6 µg/L  in April 2021 to 110 D µg/L in December 2000, which exceed the 2B Standard of 0.7 
µg/L.  The “D” flag indicates the sample was diluted by the laboratory for analysis.  The 
chlorinated compound TCE was also detected in upgradient and mid‐gradient samples at 
concentrations ranging from 4.3 µg/L in April 2021 to 23 D µg/L in December 2000, which 
exceeds the 2B Standard of 2.5 µg/L.   

The VOCs bromodichloromethane, cis‐1,2‐dichloroethene, 1,2‐dichlorobenzene, and toluene, 
were also detected in groundwater samples collected at the Site at concentrations above the 
laboratory method detection limits, but well below the 2B Standards.  No other organic 
compounds were detected in Site surface water at concentrations above the laboratory method 
detection limits. 

Semi‐Volatile Organic Compounds 
No SVOCs were detected at concentrations above the laboratory method detection limits in 
surface water samples collected at the Brownfields property.   

Metals 
Surface water sample results indicated that copper (up to 93.2 µg/L) and nickel (up to 83.8 µg/L) 
were detected in surface water samples at the Site at concentrations above the site‐specific 
chronic 2B Standards of 11.14 µg/L and 64.53 µg/L during the December 2000 sampling event.  
The chronic standard was derived using the DEQ Hardness‐Dependent Metal Calculator dated 
June 10, 2019 using the average in‐stream hardness value of 129 milligrams per liter as CaCO3.  
No other metals were detected at concentrations above the 2B Standards in surface water 
samples collected at the Site and no metals were detected at concentrations above the 2B 
Standards during the April 2021 assessment activities.   

If surface water run‐off gathers in an open excavation within an area determined to be impacted 
during construction activities, appropriate worker safety measures will be undertaken.  The 
accumulated water will be allowed to evaporate/infiltrate to the extent time for dissipation does 
not disrupt the construction schedule.  Should the time needed for natural dissipation of 
accumulated water be deemed inadequate, the water will be tested and disposed off‐Site (if 
impacted), or tested and discharged to the storm sewer (if not impacted above DEQ surface 
water standards) in accordance with applicable municipal and State regulations for erosion 
control and construction stormwater control.   

26 
EMP Version 2, January 2021  

PART 4. SEDIMENT 

1) Are sediment sources present on the property?  ☒ Yes  ☐ No 

2) If yes, is sediment at the property known to be contaminated: ☒ Yes  ☐ No ☐ Unknown 

3) Will workers or the public be in contact with sediment during planned redevelopment 
activities?   ☐ Yes ☒ No 

4) Attach a map showing location of known contaminated sediment at the property. 

5) In the event that contaminated sediment is encountered during redevelopment activities, list 
activities for management of such events (stream bed disturbance): 
Redevelopment plans that will include disturbance to the unnamed tributary of Little Sugar Creek 
are not planned at this time. 

In December 2000 and April 2021, a total of eight (8) sediment samples were collected at the Site 
from upgradient, mid‐gradient, and downgradient portions of the unnamed tributary of Little 
Sugar Creek.  Locations of historical sediment samples are shown in Figure 2, and locations of 
recent sediment samples are shown in Figure 3.  A tabular summary of recent sediment sample 
laboratory analytical results is included as Table 4.  Historical sediment analytical data is provided 
as Appendix C.  Compound concentrations exceeding DEQ IHSB PSRGs (background 
concentrations in the case of metals) during the most recent April 2021 sampling event are shown 
in Figure 4.  A brief summary of the sediment assessment results is provided below. 

Volatile Organic Compounds 
Sediment sample results indicate that low levels of the VOCs acetone, benzene, cis‐1,2‐
dichloroethene, 1,2‐dichlorobenzene, p‐isopropyltoluene, naphthalene, PCE, toluene, 1,2,4‐
trimethylbenzene, and 1,3,5‐trimethylbenzene were detected in sediment samples collected at 
the Site at concentrations above the laboratory method detection limits, but well below the DEQ 
IHSB PSRGs.  No other VOCs were detected in Site sediment at concentrations above the 
laboratory method detection limits. 

Semi‐Volatile Organic Compounds 
Sediment sample analytical results indicate that low levels of benzo(a)pyrene (up to 0.42 JD 
mg/kg) were detected in on‐Site portions of the unnamed tributary at concentrations slightly 
above the DEQ IHSB Residential PSRG of 0.11 mg/kg.  No other organic compounds were 
detected in Site sediment at concentrations above the DEQ IHSB PSRGs.   

Metals 
Sediment sample results indicated that hexavalent chromium (up to 7.1 N mg/kg) was detected in 
sediment samples collected at the Site at concentrations above background concentrations and 
the DEQ IHSB Residential and Industrial/Commercial PSRGs of 0.31 mg/kg and 6.5 mg/kg, 

27 
EMP Version 2, January 2021  
respectively.  Sediment sample results also indicate lead (435 mg/kg in the SED‐3 duplicate 
sample) was detected at a concentration above the DEQ IHSB Residential PSRG of 400 mg/kg.  No 
other metals were detected at concentrations above the DEQ IHSB PSRGs or background 
concentrations in sediment samples collection at the Site.   

PART 5.  SOIL VAPOR 

1) Do concentrations of volatile organic compounds at the Brownfields property exceed the 
following vapor intrusion screening levels (current version) in the following media: 
IHSB Residential Screening Levels: 
Soil Vapor:………..☐ Yes ☒ No  ☐ Unknown 
Groundwater:.….☒ Yes ☐ No ☐ Unknown 
IHSB Industrial/Commercial Screening Levels: 
Soil Vapor:………..☐ Yes ☒ No ☐ Unknown 
Groundwater:…..☒ Yes ☐ No ☐ Unknown 
2) Attach a map showing the locations of soil vapor contaminants that exceed site 
screening levels.  
3) If applicable, at what depth(s) is soil vapor known to be contaminated?  

4) Will workers encounter contaminated soil vapor during planned redevelopment activities? 

  ☐ Yes  ☐ No ☒ Unknown  

In the event that contaminated soil vapor is encountered during redevelopment activities 
(trenches, manways, basements or other subsurface work,) list activities for management of 
such contact:  
H&H collected soil gas samples for laboratory analysis in April 2021.  The soil gas samples were 
collected within the footprint of the proposed multi‐family residential apartment building and office 
building to evaluate risks associated with potential structural vapor intrusion.  The soil gas samples 
were collected from approximately 6 ft bgs.  Soil gas sample locations are shown in Figure 3 and a 
tabular summary of the laboratory analytical data is provided in Table 5.  

As shown in Table 5, no VOCs were detected at concentrations above the DEQ DWM Residential 
Vapor Intrusion Soil Gas Screening Levels (SGSLs).  

Hypothetical worst‐case residential use scenario risk calculator results for the soil gas to indoor air 
vapor intrusion pathway did not exceed the DEQ and EPA target threshold values for cumulative 
carcinogenic or noncarcinogenic risks.  Although results of residential risk calculations do not exceed 
the target threshold values, the PD intends to proactively install a DEQ Brownfields Program approved 
vapor intrusion mitigation system designed by a North Carolina licensed Professional Engineer during 
construction of the proposed apartment and office buildings.   

28 
EMP Version 2, January 2021  
As noted above, appropriate safety screening will be performed to protect workers during sub‐
grade work including utility installation activities should potentially impacted media be 
encountered.  Safety screening activities include monitoring the worker breathing zone with a 
calibrated photoionization detector or similar instrument.  If safety screening results indicate 
further action is warranted, an environmental professional will be contacted and the work zone 
will be evacuated until appropriate engineering controls (such as use of industrial fans) are 
implemented 

PART 6.  SUB‐SLAB SOIL VAPOR 
1) Do concentrations of volatile organic compounds at the Brownfields property exceed the 
following vapor intrusion screening levels (current version) in sub‐slab soil vapor: 
IHSB Residential Screening Levels: 
Soil Vapor:………..☐ Yes ☒ No  ☐ Unknown 
Groundwater:.….☒ Yes ☐ No ☐ Unknown 
IHSB Industrial/Commercial Screening Levels: 
Soil Vapor:………..☐ Yes ☒ No ☐ Unknown 
Groundwater:…..☒ Yes ☐ No ☐ Unknown   
2) If data indicate that sub‐slab soil vapor concentrations exceed screening levels, attach a map 
showing the location of these exceedances. 
3) At what depth(s) is sub‐slab soil vapor known to be contaminated? ☒0‐6 inches ☐Other, please 
describe:   
H&H collected sub‐slab soil gas samples for laboratory analysis in September 2009 and April 2021.  
The two (2) sub‐slab vapor samples collected in 2009 were collected under the purview of the 
DSCA Program to evaluate the potential for vapor intrusion into the 1101 N. Brevard Street 
Building.  A total of three (3) sub‐slab soil gas samples were collected within the Yandle 
Witherspoon building in footprint of the proposed multi‐family residential apartment building and 
office building to evaluate the potential for structural vapor intrusion in April 2021.  The April 
2021 sub‐slab vapor sample locations are shown in Figure 3 and a tabular summary of the 
laboratory analytical data is provided in Table 5.  The September 2009 sub‐slab vapor sample 
locations are depicted in a map in Appendix C, and a tabular summary of the laboratory analytical 
data is provided in Appendix C.   

As shown in Table 5 and Appendix C, no VOCs were detected at concentrations above the DEQ 
DWM Residential Vapor Intrusion Soil Gas Screening Levels (SGSLs).   

Hypothetical worst‐case residential use scenario risk calculator results for the soil gas to indoor air 
vapor intrusion pathway did not exceed the target threshold values for cumulative carcinogenic or 
noncarcinogenic risks.  Although results of residential risk calculations do not exceed the target 
threshold values, the PD intends to proactively install a DEQ Brownfields Program approved vapor 
intrusion mitigation system designed by a North Carolina licensed Professional Engineer during 
construction of the proposed apartment and office buildings. 

29 
EMP Version 2, January 2021  

4) Will workers encounter contaminated sub‐slab soil vapor during planned redevelopment 
activities? ☐ Yes   ☐ No   ☒ Unknown 

☐ If no, include rationale here: 
In the unlikely event impacted vapors are encountered during redevelopment activities, they will 
be managed in accordance with the procedure outlined below.   
5) In the event that contaminated soil vapor is encountered during redevelopment activities, list 
activities for management of such contact 
If impacted soil vapors are encountered during future redevelopment activities, worker 
breathing zone will be monitored using a calibrated photoionization detector by an 
environmental engineer.  If results indicate further action is warranted, appropriate engineering 
controls (such as use of industrial fans) will be implemented. 

PART 7. INDOOR AIR 

1) Are indoor air data available for the Brownfields Property? ☒ Yes   ☐ No   ☐ Unknown 
2) Attach a map showing the location(s) where indoor air contaminants exceed site screening levels. 
3) If the structures where indoor air has been documented to exceed risk‐based screening levels will 
not be demolished as part of redevelopment activities, will workers encounter contaminated 
indoor air during planned redevelopment activities? ☐ Yes   ☒ No   ☐ Unknown 

☒ If no, include rationale here: 
No indoor air samples have been collected within the existing warehouse building located at 
1001 N. Brevard Street.   

In 2009 and 2010, H&H collected a total of ten (10) indoor air samples within the commercial 
building located at 1101 N. Brevard Street on behalf of the DEQ DSCA program.  Results of the 
indoor air sampling activities completed after building renovations were complete did not 
identify VOC compounds at concentrations that exceeded the acceptable risk levels for non‐
residential workers.  The analytical data and a map depicting the locations of the indoor air 
samples within the commercial building are provided in Appendix C.   

It is of note that the existing Site buildings will be razed during redevelopment and the PD plans 
to install a passive vapor intrusion mitigation system during development of the apartment and 
office buildings.   
4) In the event that contaminated indoor air is encountered during redevelopment activities, list 
activities for management of such contact: 
In the unlikely event there is evidence of potential indoor air issues (i.e., unusual odors) during future 
redevelopment activities, the area will be evacuated and appropriate safety screening of the indoor 
air will be performed.  If warranted, safety screening procedures will include periodically screening 
indoor air for volatile organic vapors with a calibrated photoionization detector when workers are 

30 
EMP Version 2, January 2021  

VAPOR INTRUSION MITIGATION SYSTEM 
Is a vapor intrusion mitigation system (VIMS) proposed for this Brownfields Property? 
☒ Yes   ☐ No   ☐ Unknown 

☐ If no or unknown, include rationale here as well as plans for pre‐occupancy sampling, as 
necessary: 

If yes, ☐ VIMS Plan Attached or ☒ VIMS Plan to be submitted separately   
If submitted separately provide date:  
Although results of residential risk calculations do not exceed the target threshold values for 
cumulative risks, the PD intends to proactively install a DEQ Brownfields Program approved 
vapor intrusion mitigation system designed by a North Carolina licensed Professional Engineer 
during construction of the proposed apartment building.  The vapor intrusion mitigation plan will 
be provided under separate cover.   

VIMS Plan shall be signed and sealed by a NC Professional Engineer 

If no, please provide a brief rationale as to why no vapor mitigation plan is warranted:  

Note that approval of this EMP does not imply approval with any vapor intrusion mitigation land 
use restrictions or requirements of the recorded or draft Brownfields Agreement and that 
separate approval of mitigation measures will be required.  

CONTINGENCY PLAN – encountering unknown tanks, drums, or other waste materials 

In this section please provide actions that will be taken to identify or manage unknown 
potential new sources of contamination.   During redevelopment activities, it is not uncommon 
that unknown tanks, drums, fuel lines, landfills, or other waste materials are encountered.  
Notification to DEQ Brownfields Project Manager, UST Section, Fire Department, and/or other 
officials, as necessary and appropriate, is required when new potential source(s) of 
contamination are discovered.  These Notification Requirements were outlined on Page 1 of this 
EMP.   

Should potentially impacted materials be identified that are inconsistent with known site 
impacts, the DEQ Brownfields Project Manager will be notified and a sampling plan will be 
prepared based on the EMP requirements and site‐specific factors.  Samples will generally be 
collected to document the location of the potential impacts.   

Check the following chemical analysis that are to be conducted on newly identified releases: 
present in the Site buildings to identify potential indoor air issues.  If results indicate further action is 
warranted, appropriate engineering controls (such as the use of industrial fans) will be implemented.  

31 
EMP Version 2, January 2021  
☒ Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by EPA Method 8260 
☒ Semi‐volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) by EPA Method 8270 
☒ Metals RCRA List (8) (arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium, mercury, lead, selenium and 
silver) 
EPA Methods 6020/7471 

☐ Pesticides: Specify Analytical Method Number(s):  
Click or tap here to enter text. 

☐ PCBs: Specify Analytical Method Number(s):  
Click or tap here to enter text. 

☒ Other Constituents & Analytical Method(s) (i.e. Hexavalent Chromium, Herbicides, etc.) 
Please note, if field observations indicate the need for additional analyses, they should 
be conducted, even if not listed here.  
Hexavalent Chromium by EPA Method 7199 

Please provide details on the proposed methods of managing the following commonly 
encountered issues during redevelopment of Brownfields Properties. 
During construction activities, contractors may encounter unknown sub‐surface environmental 
conditions (i.e., tanks, drums, or waste materials) that if encountered, will require proper 
management.  Prior to beginning Site work, H&H will attend a pre‐construction kick‐off meeting 
with the PD and the redevelopment contractors to discuss the DEQ approved EMP and various 
scenarios when it would be appropriate and necessary to notify H&H of the discovery of unknown 
subsurface features or potentially impacted media at the Site. 

In the event that such conditions are encountered during Site development activities, the 
environmental actions noted below will be used to direct environmental actions to be taken during 
these activities and sampling data for potentially impacted soil and the disposition of impacted soil 
will be provided to DEQ when the data becomes available. 

Underground Storage Tanks:  
In the event a UST or impacts associated with a UST release are discovered at the Site during 
redevelopment activities, the UST and/or UST related impacts will be addressed through the 
Brownfields Program.  DEQ Brownfields will be notified within 48‐hours of discovery of the UST. 

If a UST is encountered, the UST will be removed, if possible and the UST will be transported off‐Site 
for disposal at a suitable facility. If the UST contains residual fluids, the fluids will be sampled for 
VOCs, SVOCs, and RCRA metals, and transported off‐Site for disposal at a suitable facility based on 
the laboratory analytical results prior to removing the UST from the ground.  If a UST is encountered 
that cannot be removed or does not require removal for geotechnical or construction purposes, it 
may be abandoned in‐place with prior DEQ approval and construction will proceed.  Where 
appropriate, the bottom may be penetrated before abandonment to prevent fluid accumulation.  
Impacted soil in the vicinity of the UST will be managed in accordance with the Managing On‐Site 

32 
EMP Version 2, January 2021  
Soil section outlined above in the EMP.  DEQ UST Program protocol (or other protocol approved in 
advance by the DEQ Brownfields Program) will be followed for UST abandonment procedures.   

Sub‐Grade Feature/Pit: 
If a sub‐grade feature or pit is encountered and does not require removal for geotechnical or 
construction purposes, it will be filled with soil or suitable fill and construction will proceed.  Where 
appropriate, the bottom may be penetrated before back filling to prevent fluid accumulation.  If the 
pit has waste in it, the waste will be set aside in a secure area and will be sampled for waste 
disposal purposes for TCLP VOCs, TCLP SVOCs, and TCLP metals and disposed off‐Site at a permitted 
facility or the waste will be managed in accordance with the Managing On‐Site Soil section outlined 
above in the EMP, whichever is most applicable based on the type of waste present.  If the pit must 
be removed and the observed waste characteristics indicate the concrete may potentially be 
contaminated to a significant degree, the concrete will be sampled and analyzed by methods 
specified by the disposal facility. 

Buried Waste Material – Note that if buried waste, non‐native fill, or any obviously filled materials 
is encountered, the DEQ Brownfields Program must be notified to determine if investigation of 
landfill gases is required: 
If excavation into buried wastes or significantly impacted soils occurs, the contractor is instructed to 
stop work in that location and notify the environmental consultant.  The environmental consultant 
will review the materials and collect samples, if warranted.  In this event, confirmation sampling will 
be conducted at representative locations in the base and the sidewalls of the excavation after the 
waste or significantly impacted soil is removed.  The confirmation samples will be analyzed for 
VOCs, SVOCs, and RCRA metals.  Areas of suspected contaminated soil that remain at the Site after 
excavation is complete above the DEQ IHSB Residential PSRGs will be managed pursuant to this 
plan.   

Re‐Use of Impacted Soils On‐Site: 
Please refer to description outlined in the Managing On‐Site Soil section (Part 1A) of the EMP above. 

If unknown, impacted soil is identified on‐site, management on‐site can be considered after the 
project team provides the necessary information, outlined in Part 1.A. Item 11, for Brownfields 
Project Manager approval prior to final placement on‐site.  

If other potential contingency plans are pertinent, please provide other details or scenarios as 
needed below: 
Click or tap here to enter text. 

POST‐REDEVELOPMENT REPORTING 

☒  Check this box to acknowledge that a Redevelopment Summary Report will be required for the 
project.  If the project duration is longer than one year, an annual update is required and will be 
due by January 31 of each year, or 30 days after each one‐year anniversary of the effective date of 

33 
EMP Version 2, January 2021  
this EMP (as agreed upon with the Project Manager).  These reports will be required for as long as 
physical redevelopment of the Brownfields Property continues, except that the final 
Redevelopment Summary Report will be submitted within 90 days after completion of 
redevelopment.  Based on the estimated construction schedule, the first Redevelopment Summary 
Report is anticipated to be submitted on 8/1/2022  

The Redevelopment Summary Report shall include environment‐related activities since the last 
report, with a summary and drawings, that describes:  
1. actions taken on the Brownfields Property;   
2. soil grading and cut and fill actions;  
3. methodology(ies) employed for field screening, sampling and laboratory analysis of 
environmental media;  
4. stockpiling, containerizing, decontaminating, treating, handling, laboratory analysis and 
ultimate disposition of any soil, groundwater or other materials suspected or confirmed 
to be contaminated with regulated substances; and  
5. removal of any contaminated soil, water or other contaminated materials (for example, 
concrete, demolition debris) from the Brownfields Property (copies of all legally required 
manifests shall be included). 

☒ Check box to acknowledge consent to provide a NC licensed P.G. or P.E. sealed, Redevelopment 
Summary Report in compliance with the site’s Brownfields Agreement. 

35 
EMP Version 2, January 2021  

Table 1
Summary of Soil Analytical Data
Yandle-Witherspoon Supply, Inc.
Charlotte, North Carolina
H&H Job No. WPP-014
Evaluation Area
Sample ID
Date
Depth (ft bgs)2-4 0-5 0-2 0-5 4-5 0-5 0-2 0-5 0-2 0-5
Sample Type Grab Composite Grab Composite Grab Composite Grab Composite Grab Composite Range Mean Range Mean
Units
VOCs (8260D)
n-Butylbenzene <0.0029 NA <0.0041 NA 0.0074 NA <0.0038 NA <0.0044 NA 4.5 780 12,000 ----------
Ethylbenzene <0.0029 NA <0.0041 NA 0.0043 J NA <0.0037 NA <0.0043 NA 13 6.1 27 ----------
Naphthalene <0.0032 NA <0.0046 NA 0.0191 NA <0.0042 NA <0.0049 NA 0.39 2.1 8.8 ----------
Toluene <0.0017 NA 0.0049 J NA 0.0046 J NA <0.0023 NA 0.0049 J NA 8.3 990 9,700 ----------
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene <0.0017 NA <0.0024 NA 0.0169 NA <0.0022 NA <0.0025 NA 12 63 370 ----------
m&p-Xylene <0.0042 NA <0.006 NA 0.0114 J NA <0.0054 NA <0.0063 NA 9.8 120 500 ----------
o-Xylene <0.0027 NA <0.0039 NA 0.0057 J NA <0.0035 NA <0.0041 NA 9.8 140 590 ----------
SVOCs (8270E)
Benzo(a)anthracene NA 0.178 J NA <0.125 NA <0.135 NA <0.139 NA <0.144 0.35 1.1 21 ----------
Benzo(a)pyrene NA 0.141 J NA <0.130 NA <0.140 NA <0.144 NA <0.149 0.12 0.11 2.1 ----------
Benzo(b)fluoranthene NA 0.203 J NA <0.125 NA <0.135 NA <0.139 NA <0.144 1.2 1.1 21 ----------
Fluoranthene NA 0.310 J NA <0.129 NA <0.138 NA <0.143 NA <0.148 670 480 6,000 ----------
Phenanthrene NA 0.181 J NA <0.123 NA <0.132 NA <0.136 NA <0.141 NE NE NE ----------
Pyrene NA 0.283 J NA <0.153 NA <0.164 NA <0.169 NA <0.175 440 360 4,500 ----------
Metals (6020B/7471B/7199)
Arsenic NA 1.41 NA 1.67 NA 3.85 NA 7.19 NA 0.899 J 5.8 0.68 3.0 --1.0 - 18 4.8 1.1 - 3.0 2.3
Barium NA 96.5 NA 43.8 NA 429 NA 115 NA 63.1 580 3,100 47,000 --50 - 1,000 356 38 - 110 74
Cadmium NA <0.106 NA <0.101 NA <0.112 NA <0.101 NA <0.100 3 14 200 --1.0 - 10 (3)4.3 (3)ND - 0.36 J 0.13
Chromium (total)NA 94.2 NA 58.6 NA 121 NA 18.8 NA 76.2 NE NE NE --7.0 - 300 65 14 - 45 31.3
Chromium (VI)NA 0.700 J NA 0.450 J NA 0.737 J NA <0.301 NA 0.568 J 3.8 0.31 6.5 --NS NS 0.34 J - 0.98 J 0.62
Chromium (III)NA 93.5 NA 58.2 NA 120.3 NA 18.8 NA 75.6 360,000 23,000 350,000 --NS NS 13.7 - 44.0 30.7
Lead NA 6.95 NA 15.8 NA 31.9 NA 9.93 NA 14.0 270 400 800 --ND - 50 16 11 - 36 20.7
Mercury NA 0.0260 J NA 0.0575 NA 0.104 NA <0.0213 NA <0.0211 1 4.7 70 --0.03 - 0.52 0.121 0.024 J - 0.097 0.074
Selenium NA 0.374 J NA 1.07 J NA 0.752 J NA 0.432 J NA 0.333 J 2.1 78 1,200 --<0.1 - 0.8 0.42 ND ND
Silver NA <0.107 NA <0.102 NA <0.113 NA <0.0651 NA <0.101 3.4 78 1,200 --ND - 5.0 (3)NS 0.033 J - 0.60 0.60
Metals (6010D TCLP)
Chromium NA NA NA NA NA <0.0330 NA NA NA NA ------5 mg/L --------
Notes:
1) North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) Inactive Hazardous Sites Branch (IHSB) Preliminary Soil Remediation Goals (PSRGs) dated June 20212) Range and mean values of background metals for North Carolina soils taken from Elements in North American Soils by Dragun and Chekiri, 2005
3) Cd and Ag concentrations were taken from Southeastern and Conterminous U.S. Soils.
4) Background metals data collected from Cotton Warehouse Brownfields property (Brownfields Project No. 24013-20-060)
5) Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Maximum Concentration of Contaminants for Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure (TCLP) regulatory level dated November 2004
Soil concentrations are reported in milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg).Compound concentrations are reported to the laboratory method detection limits.
Laboratory analytical methods are shown in parentheses.
With the exception of metals, only constituents detected in at least one sample are shown in the table above.
Bold values exceed the Residential and/or Protection of Groundwater PSRGs and background values in the case of metals.
VOCs = volatile organic compounds; SVOCs = semi-volatile organic compounds; ft bgs= feet below ground surface; mg/L = milligrams per liter
NA = not analyzed; NS = not specified; NE = not established; -- = not applicable; BDL = below the laboratory method detection limitJ = Compound was detected above the laboratory method detection limit, but below the laboratory reporting limit resulting in a laboratory estimated concentration.
Proposed Area of Cut Screening Criteria
EX-1 EX-2 EX-3 EX-4 EX-5
Protection of
Groundwater
PSRG (1)
Residential
PSRGs (1)
Industrial/
Commercial
PSRGs (1)
Regional Background Metals in
Soil (2)
Background Metals in Nearby
Brownfield Properties (4)Maximum
Concentration
for TCLP (5)
mg/kg
4/27/2021
https://harthick.sharepoint.com/sites/MasterFiles-1/Shared Documents/AAA-Master Projects/White Point Partners (WPP)/WPP-014 Yandle Witherspoon/Brownfields Assessment/Report/Tables/Data Tables.xlsx
Table 1 (Page 1 of 2)
Hart & Hickman, PC
Table 1
Summary of Soil Analytical Data
Yandle-Witherspoon Supply, Inc.
Charlotte, North Carolina
H&H Job No. WPP-014
Evaluation Area Former UST
Sample ID SB-1 SB-3 SB-4
Date 4/26/2021
Depth (ft bgs)2-4 0-5 2-4 0-4 8-10
Sample Type Grab Composite Grab Composite Grab Range Mean Range Mean
Units
VOCs (8260D)
n-Butylbenzene <0.0035 NA <0.003 NA <0.0046 <0.0034 <0.0032 <0.0034 <0.003 4.5 780 12,000 ----------
Ethylbenzene <0.0035 NA <0.003 NA <0.0045 <0.0034 <0.0031 <0.0034 <0.003 13 6.1 27 ----------
Naphthalene <0.0039 NA <0.0033 NA <0.0051 <0.0038 <0.0035 <0.0038 <0.0033 0.39 2.1 8.8 ----------
Toluene <0.0021 NA <0.0018 NA <0.0027 <0.0021 <0.0019 0.0051 J <0.0018 8.3 990 9,700 ----------
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene <0.0021 NA <0.0017 NA <0.0027 <0.002 <0.0018 <0.002 <0.0017 12 63 370 ----------
m&p-Xylene <0.0051 NA <0.0043 NA <0.0055 <0.005 <0.0046 <0.005 <0.0043 9.8 120 500 ----------
o-Xylene <0.0033 NA <0.0028 NA <0.0066 <0.0032 <0.003 <0.0032 <0.0028 9.8 140 590 ----------
SVOCs (8270E)
Benzo(a)anthracene NA <0.126 NA <0.135 <0.306 <0.130 <0.131 <0.125 <0.127 0.35 1.1 21 ----------
Benzo(a)pyrene NA <0.131 NA <0.140 <0.0.317 <0.134 <0.135 <0.130 <0.132 0.12 0.11 2.1 ----------
Benzo(b)fluoranthene NA <0.126 NA <0.135 <0.306 <0.130 <0.131 <0.125 <0.127 1.2 1.1 21 ----------
Fluoranthene NA <0.130 NA <0.138 <0.314 <0.133 <0.134 <0.129 <0.131 670 480 6,000 ----------
Phenanthrene NA <0.124 NA <0.132 <0.300 <0.127 <0.128 <0.123 <0.125 NE NE NE ----------
Pyrene NA <0.154 NA <0.164 <0.372 <0.158 <0.159 <0.153 <0.155 440 360 4,500 ----------
Metals (6020B/7471B/7199)
Arsenic NA 1.02 J NA 1.89 1.81 0.557 J 0.691 J 1.70 1.05 J 5.8 0.68 3.0 --1.0 - 18 4.8 1.1 - 3.0 2.3
Barium NA 137 NA 79.4 214 107 111 147 84.4 580 3,100 47,000 --50 - 1,000 356 38 - 110 74
Cadmium NA <0.0969 NA 0.133 J <0.121 <0.0999 <0.104 <0.0981 <0.108 3 14 200 --1.0 - 10 (3)4.3 (3)ND - 0.36 J 0.13
Chromium (total)NA 59.8 NA 52.9 176 136 139 44.7 143 NE NE NE --7.0 - 300 65 14 - 45 31.3
Chromium (VI)NA 0.576 J NA 0.466 J 2.04 0.461 J 0.693 J 0.332 J 0.588 J 3.8 0.31 6.5 --NS NS 0.34 J - 0.98 J 0.62
Chromium (III)NA 59.2 NA 52.4 174.0 135.5 138.3 44.4 142.4 360,000 23,000 350,000 --NS NS 13.7 - 44.0 30.7
Lead NA 7.52 NA 33.0 7.83 2.64 2.27 J 18.0 2.81 270 400 800 --ND - 50 16 11 - 36 20.7
Mercury NA <0.0204 NA 0.0725 0.0387 J <0.0210 <0.0218 0.0380 J <0.0226 1 4.7 70 --0.03 - 0.52 0.121 0.024 J - 0.097 0.074
Selenium NA 0.304 J NA 0.485 J 0.830 J <0.210 0.229 J 0.405 J 0.231 J 2.1 78 1,200 --<0.1 - 0.8 0.42 ND ND
Silver NA <0.0980 NA <0.102 <0.122 <0.101 <0.105 <0.0993 <0.109 3.4 78 1,200 --ND - 5.0 (3)NS 0.033 J - 0.60 0.60
Metals (6010D TCLP)
Chromium NA NA NA NA <0.0330 <0.0330 <0.0330 NA <0.0330 ------5 mg/L --------
Notes:
1) North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) Inactive Hazardous Sites Branch (IHSB) Preliminary Soil Remediation Goals (PSRGs) dated June 20212) Range and mean values of background metals for North Carolina soils taken from Elements in North American Soils by Dragun and Chekiri, 2005
3) Cd and Ag concentrations were taken from Southeastern and Conterminous U.S. Soils.
4) Background metals data collected from Cotton Warehouse Brownfields property (Brownfields Project No. 24013-20-060)
5) Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Maximum Concentration of Contaminants for Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure (TCLP) regulatory level dated November 2004
Soil concentrations are reported in milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg).Compound concentrations are reported to the laboratory method detection limits.
Laboratory analytical methods are shown in parentheses.
With the exception of metals, only constituents detected in at least one sample are shown in the table above.
Bold values exceed the Residential and/or Protection of Groundwater PSRGs and background values in the case of metals.
VOCs = volatile organic compounds; SVOCs = semi-volatile organic compounds; ft bgs= feet below ground surface; mg/L = milligrams per liter
NA = not analyzed; NS = not specified; NE = not established; -- = not applicable; BDL = below the laboratory method detection limitJ = Compound was detected above the laboratory method detection limit, but below the laboratory reporting limit resulting in a laboratory estimated concentration.
Proposed Area of Cut Former Paint Storage Area Screening Criteria
Grab
EX-6
Maximum
Concentration
for TCLP (5)
mg/kg
Background Metals in Nearby
Brownfield Properties (4)4/27/2021 4/26/2021 4/27/2021
0-2
EX-7 SB-2 / SB-DUP
Protection of
Groundwater
PSRG (1)
Residential
PSRGs (1)
Industrial/
Commercial
PSRGs (1)
Regional Background Metals in
Soil (2)
https://harthick.sharepoint.com/sites/MasterFiles-1/Shared Documents/AAA-Master Projects/White Point Partners (WPP)/WPP-014 Yandle Witherspoon/Brownfields Assessment/Report/Tables/Data Tables.xlsx
Table 1 (Page 2 of 2)
Hart & Hickman, PC
Table 2
Summary of Groundwater Analytical Data
Yandle-Witherspoon Supply, Inc.
Charlotte, North Carolina
H&H Job No. WPP-014
Evaluation Area Upgradient - Western
Corner
Sample ID TMW-1
Date
Units
VOCs (8260D)
Acetone 12.3 J <5.1 <5.1 6,000 4,500,000 19,000,000
1,2-Dichlorobenzene 0.70 J 0.91 J 1.1 20 530 2,200
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene <0.38 1.2 1.5 70 NE NE
2-Hexanone <0.48 <0.48 1.2 J NE 1,600 6,900
Tetrachloroethene 2.2 8.0 8.9 0.7 12 48
Trichloroethene 0.96 J 5.2 5.6 3 1 4.4
SVOCs (8270E)ALL BDL ALL BDL ALL BDL ------
Metals (6020B/7470A)
Arsenic 0.340 J 0.217 J 0.228 J 10 ----
Barium 70.6 70.9 69.3 700 ----
Cadmium <0.150 <0.150 <0.150 2 ----
Chromium (Total)9.92 1.40 J 1.33 J 10 ----
Lead <0.849 <0.849 <0.849 15 ----
Mercury <0.100 <0.100 <0.100 1 0.18 0.75
Selenium 0.328J <0.300 <0.300 20 ----
Silver <0.0700 <0.0700 <0.0700 20 ----
Notes:
1) North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) 15A NCAC 02L.0202 Groundwater Standards (2L Standards) dated April 20132) DEQ Division of Waste Management (DWM) Vapor Intrusion Groundwater Screening Levels (GWSLs) dated June 2021Concentrations are reported in micrograms per liter (µg/L).
Compound concentrations are reported to the laboratory method detection limits.
Laboratory analytical methods are shown in parentheses.
With the exception of metals, only constituents detected in at least one sample are shown in the table above.
Bold values exceed the 2L Standard.
Underlined values exceed the DWM Residential and Non-Residential Vapor Intrusion GWSLs.
VOCs = volatile organic compounds; SVOCs = semi-volatile organic compounds; NE = not established; -- = not applicable; BDL = below laboratory method detection limit J = Compound was detected above the laboratory method detection limit, but below the laboratory reporting limit resulting in a laboratory estimated concentration.
µg/L
Downgradient - Northern Corner Screening Criteria
TMW-2 / GW-DUP
2L Standards (1) Residential
GWSLs (2)
Non-Residential
GWSLs (2)4/28/2021
https://harthick.sharepoint.com/sites/MasterFiles-1/Shared Documents/AAA-Master Projects/White Point Partners (WPP)/WPP-014 Yandle Witherspoon/Brownfields Assessment/Report/Tables/Data Tables.xlsx
6/24/2021
Table 2 (Page 1 of 1)
Hart & Hickman, PC
Table 3
Summary of Surface Water Analytical Data
Yandle-Witherspoon Supply, Inc.
Charlotte, North Carolina
H&H Job No. WPP-014
Evaluation Area Mid-Stream Downgradient
Sample ID BF-SW-1 BF-SW-2
Date Acute Chronic
Units
VOCs (8260D)
Bromodichloromethane <0.31 <0.31 0.35 J <0.47 NE NE
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 0.47 J 0.42 J <0.38 <0.38 60**NE
Tetrachloroethene 14.6 15.5 <0.29 <0.29 0.7 (1)NE
Trichloroethylene 4.3 4.8 <0.38 <0.38 2.5 (1)NE
Toluene <0.48 <0.48 0.81 J <0.48 11 (3)NE
SVOCs (8270E)ALL BDL ALL BDL ALL BDL ALL BDL ----
Metals (6020B/7470A)
Arsenic 0.699 J 0.662 J 0.894 J 1.16 J 340 (3)150 (3)
Barium 79.7 83.2 43.3 42.2 1000 (1)NE
Cadmium <0.150 <0.150 <0.150 <0.150 3.42 (2)0.51 (2)
Chromium (Total)20.6 21.6 1.99 J 1.44 J 702.11 (2)91.33 (2)
Lead <0.849 <0.849 <0.849 <0.849 85.15 (2)3.32 (2)
Mercury <0.100 <0.100 <0.100 <0.100 0.012 (3)NE
Selenium 1.16 J 1.04 J 0.343 J 0.428 J 5 (3)NE
Silver <0.0700 <0.0700 <0.0700 <0.0700 4.99 (2)NE
Hardness
Total Hardness as CaCO3 199,000 204,000 85,300 80,100 ----
Notes:
1) North Carolina 15A North Carolina Administrative Code 02B.0202 Surface Water Quality Standards (2B Standards) for Class I-V Surface Waters dated June 2019
2) Standard derived using the DEQ Hardness-Dependent Metal Calculator dated June 10, 2019 using the average in-stream hardness value of 129 milligrams per liter as CaCO3.
3) North Carolina 2B Standards for Class C Surface Waters dated June 2019
*North Carolina In-Stream Target Values for Class C Surface Waters dated June 2019
**North Carolina In-Stream Target Values for Class I-V Surface Waters dated June 2019
Samples were collected from on-Site portions of an unnamed tributary of Little Sugar Creek, a Class C surface water body.
Compound concentrations are reported in micrograms per liter (µg/L).
Compound concentrations are reported to the laboratory method detection limits.
Laboratory analytical methods are shown in parentheses.
Aside from metals, only those compounds detected in at least one sample are shown in the table above.
Bold concentrations exceed the 2B Standards.
VOCs = volatile organic compounds; SVOCs = semi-volatile organic compounds; NE = not established; BDL = below laboratory method detection limit; -- = not applicable J = Compound was detected above the laboratory method detection limit, but below the laboratory reporting limit resulting in a laboratory estimated concentration.
4/28/2021
µg/L
Upgradient Screening Criteria
BF-SW-3/BF-SW-DUP 2B Standards
https://harthick.sharepoint.com/sites/MasterFiles-1/Shared Documents/AAA-Master Projects/White Point Partners (WPP)/WPP-014 Yandle Witherspoon/Brownfields Assessment/Report/Tables/Data Tables.xlsx
6/24/2021
Table 3 (Page 1 of 1)
Hart & Hickman, PC
Table 4
Summary of Sediment Analytical Data
Yandle-Witherspoon Supply, Inc
Charlotte, North Carolina
H&H Job No. WPP-014
Evaluation Area Downgradient
Sample ID BF-SED-4 BF-SED-1 BF-SED-2
Date Range Mean Range Mean
Units
VOCs (8260D)
Acetone 0.108 J 0.0761 J <0.149 <0.0415 <0.0482 12,000 140,000 --------
Benzene 0.0051 J <0.0035 <0.0092 <0.0026 <0.003 1.2 5.4 --------
1,2-Dichlorobenzene 0.0108 <0.0031 <0.0084 <0.0023 <0.0027 380 2,000 -- ------
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 0.0051 J <0.003 <0.0079 <0.0022 <0.0026 31 470 --------
p-Isopropyltoluene 0.0177 0.019 <0.0114 <0.0032 <0.0037 NE NE --------
Naphthalene <0.0051 0.0097 <0.0122 0.0068 <0.004 2.1 8.8 --------
Tetrachloroethene 0.0088 J 0.0069 J <0.0073 <0.002 <0.0024 17 82 --------
Toluene 0.0095 J 0.0171 <0.0066 0.0044 J <0.0021 990 9,700 --------
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 0.0274 0.0143 <0.0064 <0.0018 <0.0021 63 370 --------
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 0.0132 <0.0029 <0.0078 <0.0022 <0.0025 56 320 --------
SVOCs (8270E)
Fluoranthene <0.859 <0.785 <0.2 0.200 J <0.155 480 6,000 --------
Phenanthrene <0.821 <0.750 <0.191 0.186 J <0.149 NE NE --------
Metals (6020B/7199/7471B)
Arsenic 1.41 J 1.44 J 1.52 4.03 3.62 0.68 3.0 1.0 - 18 4.8 1.1 - 3.0 2.3
Barium 102 76.4 73.7 115 207 3,100 47,000 50 - 1,000 356 38 - 110 74
Cadmium 0.172 J <0.123 <0.0946 0.170 J 0.171 J 14 200 1.0 - 10*4.3 ND - 0.36 J 0.13
Chromium (total)24.5 25.4 43.0 28.5 48.2 NE NE 7.0 - 300 65 14 - 45 31.3
Chromium (IV)<0.387 <0.368 1.81 <0.474 1.11 J 0.31 6.5 NS NS 0.34 J - 0.98 J 0.62
Chromium (III) 24.5 25.4 41.2 28.5 47.1 23,000 350,000 NS NS 13.7 - 44.0 30.7
Lead 45.0 47.4 13.1 21.8 31.1 400 800 ND - 50 16 Nov-36 20.7
Mercury <0.0273 <0.0260 <0.0199 <0.0334 0.260 4.7 70 0.03 - 0.52 0.121 0.024 J - 0.097 0.074
Selenium <0.273 <0.260 0.272 J <0.334 0.545 J 78 1,200 <0.1 - 0.8 0.42 ND ND
Silver <0.131 <0.125 <0.0957 <0.161 0.238 J 78 1,200 ND - 5.0 NS 0.033 J - 0.60 0.60
Notes:
1) North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) Inactive Hazardous Sites Branch (IHSB) Preliminary Soil Remediation Goals (PSRGs) dated June 2021
2) Range and mean values of background metals for North Carolina soils taken from Elements in North American Soils by Dragun and Chekiri, 2005. Background Cd and Ag concentrations were taken from Southeastern and Conterminous US soils.
3) Background metals data collected from Cotton Warehoue Brownfields property (Brownfields Project No. 24013-20-060)
Soil concentrations are reported in milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg).
Compound concentrations are reported to the laboratory method detection limits.
Laboratory analytical methods are shown in parentheses.
Aside from metals, only those compounds detected in at least one sample are shown in the table above.
Bold values exceed the Residential PSRG and background levels in the case of metals.
VOCs = volatile organic compounds; SVOCs = semi-volatile organic compounds; NE = not established; NS = not specified; ND = not detected; -- = not applicable
J = Compound was detected above the laboratory method detection limit, but below the laboratory reporting limit resulting in a laboratory estimated concentration.
Background Metals in Nearby Browfields
Properties (3)
4/28/2021
mg/kg
Upgradient Mid-Stream Screening Criteria
BF-SED-3 / BF-SED-DUP Residential
PSRGs (1)
Industrial/
Commercial
PSRGs (1)
Regional Background
Metals in Soil (2)
https://harthick.sharepoint.com/sites/MasterFiles-1/Shared Documents/AAA-Master Projects/White Point Partners (WPP)/WPP-014 Yandle Witherspoon/Brownfields Assessment/Report/Tables/Data Tables.xlsx
6/24/2021
Table 4 (Page 1 of 1)
Hart & Hickman, PC
Table 5
Summary of Soil Gas Analytical Data
Yandle-Witherspoon Supply, Inc
Charlotte, North Carolina
H&H Job No. WPP-014
Evaluation Area
Sample ID SGP-1 SGP-2 SGP-3 SGP-4 SGP-5 SGP-6 SGP-8 SGP-9
Sample Date
Sample Type Exterior Soil Gas
Units
VOCs (TO-15)
1,1,1-Trichloroethane <0.35 1.8 J 4.2 7.9 <0.37 <0.39 <0.39 <0.39 <0.36 <0.35 35,000 440,000
1,1,2-Trichlorotrifluoroethane <0.55 0.63 J 0.95 J 0.93 J 0.95 J 1.3 J 0.64 J 0.81 J 0.74 J 0.74 J 35,000 440,000
1,1-Dichloroethane <0.31 0.68 J <0.32 <0.32 <0.33 <0.35 <0.35 <0.35 <0.32 <0.31 58 770
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 1.9 J 0.85 J 4.3 10.5 3.2 1.5 J 1.9 J 1.8 J 6.7 <0.67 420 5,300
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 1.5 J 1.0 J 2.2 3.3 0.95 J <0.61 0.90 J 0.97 J 2.4 <0.55 420 5,300
2-Butanone (MEK)18.4 21.7 12.9 4.4 J 25.7 6.6 <0.98 3.7 J 10.0 5.0 J 35,000 440,000
2-Hexanone 4.7 J 6.9 J 2.0 J <0.86 8.6 3.4 J 2.3 J 2.9 J 8.7 2.6 J 210 2,600
2-Propanol 7.6 10.7 8.3 4.0 J 19.7 5.8 4.0 J 3.6 J 12.1 3.1 J NE NE
4-Ethyltoluene <0.90 <0.92 1.3 J 2.2 J <0.93 1.5 J <0.99 <0.99 2.0 J <0.90 NE NE
4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK)<0.61 3.7 J 0.92 J <0.62 4.0 J 1.3 J 1.2 J 1.9 J 2.0 J 0.86 J 21,000 260,000
Acetone 154 138 62.8 23.1 77.6 <3.8 14.3 8.2 J <3.5 32.5 220,000 2,700,000
Benzene 9.1 0.82 0.49 J 0.44 J 1.5 3.1 1.8 1.6 5.2 0.53 J 12 160
Carbon disulfide 17.5 1.5 1.1 J 0.65 J 35.1 54.4 42.7 12.0 38.3 6.1 4,900 61,000
Chlorobenzene <0.29 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.31 <0.33 1.1 J 0.71 J <0.30 <0.29 350 4,400
Chloroethane <0.43 1.1 <0.43 <0.43 <0.44 <0.47 <0.47 <0.47 <0.43 <0.43 NE NE
Chloroform <0.35 <0.36 <0.36 <0.36 1.9 <0.38 <0.38 <0.38 2.2 0.59 J 4.1 53
Chloromethane <0.16 2.0 6.0 <0.17 <0.17 <0.18 <0.18 <0.18 <0.17 <0.16 630 7,900
Cyclohexane 69.2 1.0 J 0.85 J 1.9 J 0.89 J 26.3 3.6 J 3.7 J 17.3 1.5 J 42,000 530,000
Dichlorodifluoromethane 0.64 J 4.0 5.5 4.3 3.3 3.6 2.8 3.3 3.0 4.1 700 8,800
Ethanol 22.7 152 251 727 37.8 41.1 18.9 15.0 31.7 18.6 NE NE
Ethyl acetate <0.25 <0.25 <0.25 <0.25 5.3 7.6 <0.28 <0.28 3.5 <0.25 490 6,100
Ethylbenzene 1.7 0.97 J 1.5 J 2.1 2.2 9.3 6.5 6.6 6.1 1.3 J 37 490
n-Heptane 21.5 3.9 2.0 3.7 4.6 54.8 21.2 22.5 37.2 2.7 2,800 35,000
n-Hexane 31.8 13.9 7.1 18.1 4.5 17.7 10.2 8.6 22.8 4.6 4,900 61,000
m&p-Xylene 6.8 3.2 J 7.3 9.0 7.3 24.7 34.0 34.0 20.9 4.7 700 8,800
o-Xylene 3.2 1.2 J 1.8 4.6 2.9 14.1 12.2 12.5 7.0 1.9 700 8,800
Propylene <0.25 1.7 3.3 0.99 J 5.6 18.7 29.5 38.5 367 7.1 21,000 260,000
Tetrachloroethene <0.55 42.5 1.5 41.4 0.68 J 1.7 <0.61 <0.61 0.70 J 5.6 280 3,500
Tetrahydrofuran <0.34 <0.35 <0.35 2.8 1.2 J <0.38 0.65 J <0.38 <0.35 <0.34 NE NE
Toluene 16.9 3.0 2.4 6.2 35.7 78.4 67.0 76.9 69.6 20.1 35,000 440,000
Trichloroethene <0.37 4.0 2.7 <0.38 <0.39 <0.41 <0.41 <0.41 <0.38 <0.37 14 180
Trichlorofluoromethane 0.64 J 5.4 3.0 17.3 2.6 6.0 1.8 J 2.5 <0.45 5.8 NE NE
Vinyl chloride <0.16 <0.17 <0.17 <0.17 <0.17 <0.18 <0.18 <0.18 0.71 <0.16 5.6 280
Notes:
1) North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) Division of Waste Management (DWM) Vapor Intrusion Sub-Slab & Exterior Soil Gas Screening Levels (SGSLs) dated June 2021
Concentrations are reported in micrograms per cubic meter (µg/m3).
Compound concentrations are reported to the laboratory method detection limits.
Laboratory analytical method is shown in parentheses.
Only compounds detected in at least one sample are shown in the above table.
VOCs = volatile organic compounds; NE = not established
J = Compound was detected above the laboratory method detection limit, but below the laboratory reporting limit resulting in a laboratory estimated concentration.
Non-Residential SGSLs
(1)
µg/m3
Proposed Multi-Family Building Proposed Office Building
SGP-7/SGP-DUP
Residential SGSLs (1)4/29/2021
Sub-Slab Soil Gas Exterior Soil Gas
Screening Criteria
https://harthick.sharepoint.com/sites/MasterFiles-1/Shared Documents/AAA-Master Projects/White Point Partners (WPP)/WPP-014 Yandle Witherspoon/Brownfields Assessment/Report/Tables/Data Tables.xlsx
6/24/2021
Table 5 (Page 1 of 1)
Hart & Hickman, PC
USGS The National Map: National Boundaries Dataset, 3DEP ElevationProgram, Geographic Names Information System, National HydrographyDataset, National Land Cover Database, National Structures Dataset,and National Transportation Dataset; USGS Global Ecosystems; U.S.Census Bureau TIGER/Line data; USFS Road Data; Natural Earth Data;U.S. Department of State Humanitarian Information Unit; and NOAANational Centers for Environmental Information, U.S. Coastal ReliefModel. Data refreshed May, 2020.
SITE LOCATION MAP
YANDLE-WITHERSPOON SUPPLY INC.
N. BREVARD STREET AND BELMONT AVENUECHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA
DATE: 5-13-21
JOB NO: WPP-014
REVISION NO: 0
FIGURE NO: 1
3921 Sunset Ridge Road, Ste. 301Raleigh, North Carolina 27607919-847-4241 (p) 919-847-4261 (f)License # C-1269 / # C-245 Geology
TITLE
PROJECT
0 2,000 4,000
SCALE IN FEET
SITE
Path: \\HHFS01\Redirectedfolders\sperry\My Documents\ArcGIS\PROJECTS\WPP-014\Figure 1 - Site Location Map.mxdN
U.S.G.S. QUADRANGLE MAP
CHARLOTTE EAST, NORTH CAROLINA 2013
QUADRANGLE7.5 MINUTE SERIES (TOPOGRAPHIC)
REVISION NO. 0
JOB NO. WPP-014
DATE: 5-13-21
FIGURE NO. 2
YANDLE-WITHERSPOON SUPPLY INC.
N. BREVARD STREET AND BELMONT AVENUE
CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA
SITE AND HISTORICAL SAMPLE
LOCATION MAP
LEGEND
BROWNFIELDS PROPERTY
BOUNDARY
PARCEL BOUNDARY
RAILROAD TRACK
TRIBUTARY OF LITTLE SUGAR CREEK
FORMER MONITORING WELLS
FORMER TEMPORARY MONITORING
WELL OR GROUNDWATER GRAB
SAMPLE LOCATION
FORMER CO-LOCATED SURFACE
WATER / SEDIMENT SAMPLE
LOCATION
FORMER SURFACE WATER SAMPLE
LOCATION
FORMER 2,000-GALLON GASOLINE
UST
ALIQUOT SOIL BORING LOCATION
2923 South Tryon Street-Suite 100
Charlotte, North Carolina 28203704-586-0007(p) 704-586-0373(f)License # C-1269 / #C-245 Geology
CS-06
NORT
H
B
REV
A
R
D ST
RE
ET
B
E
L
M
O
N
T

A
V
E
N
U
E
NOTES:
1. PARCEL DATA AND AERIAL IMAGERY OBTAINED FROM
MECKLENBURG COUNTY GIS, 2020.
2. MONITORING WELLS MW-11I, MW-12S, MW-15S, AND MW-16I
WERE INSTALLED BY BROWN AND CALDWELL IN 2001.
3. GROUNDWATER SAMPLES SLGW-8 THROUGH SLGW-10
AND SLGW-16 THROUGH SLGW-21 WERE COLLECTED BY
BROWN AND CALDWELL IN NOVEMBER 2000 AND JANUARY
2001.
4. TEMPORARY MONITORING WELLS GW-03, GW-06, GW-07,
AND GW-08 WERE INSTALLED BY TERRACON IN
SEPTEMBER 2016.
5. CO-LOCATED SURFACE WATER AND SEDIMENT SAMPLES
SUR-2/SED-2 THROUGH SUR-5/SED-5 WERE COLLECTED BY
BROWN AND CALDWELL IN DECEMBER 2000 AND JANUARY
2001.
6. SURFACES WATER SAMPLES SW-01 AND SW-02 WERE
COLLECTED BY TERRACON IN SEPTEMBER 2016.
7. COMPOSITE SOIL SAMPLES CS-05 AND CS-06 WERE
COLLECTED BY TERRACON IN OCTOBER 2018.
8. NCBP = NORTH CAROLINA BROWNFIELDS PROGRAM
IHSB = INACTIVE HAZARDOUS SITES BRANCH
DSCA = DRY-CLEANING SOLVENT CLEANUP ACT
UST = UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK
MW-16I
MW-15S
MW-11I
MW-12S
GW-08SLGW-17
SLGW-16
GW-07
GW-03
SLGW-21
SLGW-20
SLGW-10
SLGW-9
SLGW-8
SLGW-18
SLGW-19
GW-06
SW-02
SUR-2/SED-2
SW-01
SUR-3/SED-3
SUR-4/SED-4
SUR-5/SED-5
ALPHA MILLS APARTMENTS
(NCBP NO. 07009-03-060 &
IHSB PROJECT NO. NCD003162500)ALEXAN APARTMENTS
(1009 NORTH CALDWELL STREET)
OPTIMIST HALL
PARKING
OPTIMIST HALL
(NCBP NO. 20005-16-060)
FORMER GAY LAUNDRY AND CLEANERS
(DSCA PROJECT NO. DC60044)
ALPHA CANVAS AND AWNING
(411 EAST 13TH STREET)
MERCHANTS BONDED COTTON
WAREHOUSE BROWNFIELDS PROJECT
(200 WADSWORTH PLACE)
(NCBP NO. 24013-20-060)
CS-05
N:\AAA-Master Projects\White Point Partners (WPP)\WPP-014 Yandle Witherspoon\Brownfields Assessment\Report\Figures\Site Map.dwg, Figure 2, 5/13/2021 3:15:28 PM, sperry
BF-SW-2BF-SW-1TMW-2TMW-1SB-1SGP-1SGP-3SGP-4SGP-8SGP-6SGP-9SGP-7SGP-2SB-2SGP-5BF-SW-3BF-SED-3BF-SED-4BF-SED-1BF-SED-2SB-4SB-3REVISION NO. 0JOB NO. WPP-014DATE: 5-27-21FIGURE NO. 3YANDLE-WITHERSPOON SUPPLY INC. N. BREVARD STREET AND BELMONT AVENUECHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINASAMPLE LOCATION MAPLEGENDBROWNFIELDS PROPERTYBOUNDARYPARCEL BOUNDARYRAILROAD TRACKELEVATION CONTOUR (2 FT. MSL)FORMER PAINT AREAPROPOSED MULTI-FAMILYRESIDENTIAL OR AMENITIESBUILDINGPROPOSED OFFICE BUILDINGPROPOSED PARKING DECKSOIL BORING LOCATIONTEMPORARY MONITORING WELLLOCATIONSOIL GAS SAMPLE LOCATIONSURFACE WATER SAMPLE LOCATIONSEDIMENT SAMPLE LOCATION2923 South Tryon Street-Suite 100Charlotte, North Carolina 28203704-586-0007(p) 704-586-0373(f)License # C-1269 / #C-245 GeologyNORTH BREVARD STREETBELMONT AVENUENOTES:1. PARCEL DATA AND AERIAL IMAGERY OBTAINED FROMMECKLENBURG COUNTY GIS, 2020.2. ELEVATION DATA OBTAINED FROM MECKLENBURGCOUNTY LIDAR, 2013.3. APPROXIMATE EXTENT OF THE FORMER PAINT AREA ISBASED ON 1963 SANBORN MAP.4. APPROXIMATE EXTENT OF PROPOSED BUILDINGFOOTPRINTS BASED ON PRELIMINARY SITE PLANPROVIDED BY THE PD DATED 4/20/21.5. FT. MSL = FEET ABOVE MEAN SEA LEVELTRIBUTARY OF LITTLESUGAR CREEKPROPOSEDPARKING DECKPROPOSEDCOURTYARDPROPOSED POOL/COURTYARDS:\AAA-Master Projects\White Point Partners (WPP)\WPP-014 Yandle Witherspoon\EMP\Figures\Compound Concentration Map.dwg, Figure 3, 5/27/2021 10:52:53 AM, sperry
BF-SW-2
BF-SW-1
TMW-2
TMW-1
SB-1
SGP-1
SGP-3
SGP-4
SGP-8
SGP-6
SGP-9
SGP-7
SGP-2
SB-2 SGP-5
BF-SW-3
BF-SED-3
BF-SED-4
BF-SED-1
BF-SED-2
SB-4
SB-3
REVISION NO. 0
JOB NO. WPP-014
DATE: 6-17-21
FIGURE NO. 4
YANDLE-WITHERSPOON SUPPLY INC.
N. BREVARD STREET AND BELMONT AVENUE
CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA
COMPOUND CONCENTRATION MAP
LEGEND
BROWNFIELDS PROPERTY
BOUNDARY
PARCEL BOUNDARY
RAILROAD TRACK
FORMER PAINT AREA
PROPOSED MULTI-FAMILY
RESIDENTIAL OR AMENITIES
BUILDING
PROPOSED OFFICE BUILDING
PROPOSED PARKING DECK
SOIL BORING LOCATION
TEMPORARY MONITORING WELL
LOCATION
SOIL GAS SAMPLE LOCATION
SURFACE WATER SAMPLE LOCATION
SEDIMENT SAMPLE LOCATION
2923 South Tryon Street-Suite 100
Charlotte, North Carolina 28203
704-586-0007(p) 704-586-0373(f)
License # C-1269 / #C-245 Geology
NOR
T
H
B
R
E
V
A
R
D
S
T
R
E
E
T BE
LMON
T

A
V
E
NUE
NOTES:
1.PARCEL DATA AND AERIAL IMAGERY OBTAINED FROM
MECKLENBURG COUNTY GIS, 2020.
2.APPROXIMATE EXTENT OF THE FORMER PAINT AREA IS
BASED ON 1963 SANBORN MAP.
3.APPROXIMATE EXTENT OF PROPOSED BUILDING
FOOTPRINTS BASED ON PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN
PROVIDED BY THE PD DATED 4/20/21.
4.SOIL, GROUNDWATER, SURFACE WATER, AND
SEDIMENT SAMPLES COLLECTED BY H&H FROM 4/26/21
TO 4/28/21.
5.PCE = TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
TCE = TRICHLOROETHYLENE
CR (VI) = HEXAVALENT CHROMIUM
mg/kg = MILLIGRAMS PER KILOGRAM
µg/L = MICROGRAMS PER LITER
TRIBUTARY OF LITTLE
SUGAR CREEK
PROPOSED
PARKING DECK
PROPOSED
COURTYARD
PROPOSED POOL/
COURTYARD
TMW-2 / GW-DUP
PCE 8.0 / 8.9 µg/L
TCE 5.2 / 5.6 µg/L
TMW-2 / GW-DUP
PCE 8.0 / 8.9 µg/L
TCE 5.2 / 5.6 µg/L
TMW-1
PCE 2.2 µg/L
BF-SED-4
CR (VI)1.81 mg/kg
BF-SED-2
CR (VI)1.11 J mg/kg
BF-SW-3 / BF-SW-DUP
PCE 14.6 / 15.5 µg/L
TCE 4.3 / 4.8 µg/L
SB-1 (8-10)
CR (VI)2.04 mg/kg
CONSTITUENT
CONCENTRATION
UNITS
SAMPLE ID
S:\AAA-Master Projects\White Point Partners (WPP)\WPP-014 Yandle Witherspoon\EMP\Figures\Compound Concentration Map.dwg, Figure 4, 6/17/2021 12:56:00 PM, SVincent
EX-1
EX-2
EX-3
EX-4
EX-5
EX-6
EX-7
REVISION NO. 0
JOB NO. WPP-014
DATE: 6-17-21
FIGURE NO. 5
YANDLE-WITHERSPOON SUPPLY INC.
N. BREVARD STREET AND BELMONT AVENUE
CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA
IN SITU SOIL SAMPLE COMPOUND
CONCENTRATION MAP
LEGEND
BROWNFIELDS PROPERTY
BOUNDARY
RAILROAD TRACK
IN-SITU SOIL BORING LOCATION
APPROXIMATE EXTENT OF SOIL WITH
COMPOUND CONCENTRATIONS
ABOVE THE DEQ IHSB PSRGs
2923 South Tryon Street-Suite 100
Charlotte, North Carolina 28203
704-586-0007(p) 704-586-0373(f)
License # C-1269 / #C-245 Geology
NOR
T
H
B
R
E
V
A
R
D
S
T
R
E
E
T
NOTES:
1. CUT-FILL ANALYSIS PREPARED BY LAND DESIGN
ON MARCH 15, 2021.
2. IN-SITU SOIL SAMPLES COLLECTED BY H&H ON
4/6/21 AND 4/27/21.
3. DEQ = NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
IHSB PSRGs = INACTIVE HAZARDOUS SITES
BRANCH PRELIMINARY SOIL REMEDIATION GOALS
mg/kg = MILLIGRAMS PER KILOGRAM
FT BGS = FEET BELOW GROUND SURFACE
TRIBUTARY OF LITTLE
SUGAR CREEK
COLOR RAMP KEY
EX-1 (0-5)
BENZO(A)PYRENE 0.141 J mg/kg EX-1 (0-5)
BENZO(A)PYRENE 0.141 J mg/kgCONSTITUENT
CONCENTRATION
UNITS
SAMPLE ID &
DEPTH (FT BGS)
CUBIC YARDS CHARACTERIZED PER SAMPLE
SAMPLE DEPTH (FT BGS)0-4 0-5
EX-1 --1,200
EX-2 --1,200
EX-3 --1,200
EX-4 --1,200
EX-5 --1,200
EX-6 --1,200
EX-7 975 --SAMPLE IDS:\AAA-Master Projects\White Point Partners (WPP)\WPP-014 Yandle Witherspoon\EMP\Figures\Compound Concentration Map.dwg, Figure 5, 6/17/2021 12:55:45 PM, SVincent

Appendix A

Site & Civil Plans

T
T
T
F
F
F
F
F
F
T
2S/2R2S/2R2S/2R2S/2R2S/2R
UP
UP
T
T
T
F
F
F
F
F
F
T
UP
UP
UPUP
UP
(2) multi family transformer
s
Pool Courtyard
Passive Courtyard
LeasinglAmenity
6' - 10 103/128"8' - 8"2 + 1 HCT T T
TTPLAZA
82 TOTAL PARKING
SPACES THIS LEVEL
30 COMPACT
4(1C)STAIRSTAIR'SROOF9(1C)
4(2C)LOB.UP
5.43%
14(5C)
14(6C)
3(2C)
13(7C)
4(2C)
+705 +704
1:13.5 (7.4%)1'-6" STEP
(7.4%) 6" STEP
UP
5.43%
17(4C)© 2020 CLINE DESIGN ASSOCIATES, PA EXPRESSLY RESERVES ITS COMMON LAW COPYRIGHT AND OTHER PROPERTY RIGHTS IN THESE PLANS. THESE PLANS ARE NOT TO BE REPRODUCED, CHANGED OR COPIED IN ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER, NOR ARE THEY TO BE ASSIGNED TO ANY THIRD PARTY WITHOUT FIRST OBTAINING THE EXPRESSED WRITTEN PERMISSION AND CONSENT OF CLINE DESIGN ASSOCIATES, PA.DRAWN BY:
CHECKED BY:
DATEREVISIONS:
DATE:
PROJECT:
220 E. Peterson Dr.
Charlotte, NC 28217
704/333-7272
ClineDesignAssoc.comNOT FORCONSTRUCTION4/21/2021 1:00:53 PMC:\Users\DanielRi\Documents\221002_Optimist II_DD_R21_danielriXCQQ6.rvtTRAMMELL CROW RESIDENTIALOptimist IICHARLOTTE, NC221002
ARCHITECTURAL SITE
PLAN
G1.02
04.20.21
DCR / AA / NS
TEAM INITIALSDESIGNDEVELOPMENT
1" = 20'-0"
100 Site Plan
OVERALL TOTAL 108 3 111
THIRD FLOOR:27 1 28
SECOND FLOOR:27 1 28
FIRST FLOOR (UPPER): 33 --33
FIRST FLOOR (LOWER): 21 1 18
STANDARD HANDICAPPED TOTAL (PER
FLOOR)
BIKE PARKING COUNTS:
39%(17 HC REQ. 18 PROVIDED, 3 VAN REQ. 4 VAN
PROVIDED)
OVERALL TOTALS
381 258 --4 14 657
ON STREET (SURFACE)LEASING 2 ------1 3
TOP FLOOR 52 30 ----82
SEVENTH FLOOR 50 31 ----81
SIXTH FLOOR 49 31 ----1 81
FIFTH FLOOR 51 27 ----2 80
FOURTH FLOOR 51 27 ----2 80
THIRD FLOOR 38 38 --4 80
SECOND FLOOR 39 37 --2 2 80
PARKING GARAGE
FIRST FLOOR 49 37 --2 2 90
VAN STANDARD HCSTANDARD COMPACT
FUTURE EV HANDICAPPED FLOOR
TOTALS
Parking Counts

Appendix B

Grading Plan and Cut-Fill Analysis
N. BREVARD STREET
White Point Paces
Partners LLC
Parcel A
SOUTHERN RAILROAD
200' R/W
Seaboard Air Line Railroad Co.
Seaboard Air Line Railroad Co.
705
700
695
690
685
675
677680682677680685690695700705
70069569068
5680
6
7
5
6
8
0
6
7
4
6
8
5
687
6
9
0
695700703
705707
700 695698705
70
0
70
5
70
0
6
9
5705700695705
700
690
695
690
695
700
705
7007
0
5709720
715
710
710708710712710709705704695700705685 682710715710
FFE
698.00
694.69 RIM
FFE698.00
FFE700.00
FFE701.00
694.23
TC 695.50BC 695.00TC 696.50BC 696.00
TC 697.50BC 697.00
TC 698.50BC 698.00
TC 699.50BC 699.00
TC 700.50BC 700.00
TC 702.50BC 702.00 TC 701.50BC 701.00
TC 703.50BC 703.00
TC 704.50BC 704.00
TC 705.50BC 705.00
TC 707.50BC 707.00
TC 706.50
BC 706.00
TC 694.50BC 694.00
694.35
TC 695.50BC 695.00
ENTRANCE TO BEFURTHER COORDINATEDWITH ARCHITECT.RECESSED DOORWAYCONDITION WITH STEPSMOST LIKELY NEEDED
1.5%
1.5%
1.5%
3
.3
0%2.73%1.5%
1.8%1.5%1.5%695.86
697.50(TOP OF MULCH)1.37%1.5%1.5%TC 697.12BC 696.62
4.2%
697.36
TC 697.76BC 697.26
1.5%
695.64
1.5%TC 696.50BC 696.00
TC 697.50BC 697.00
2.4%3.02%
FFE
703.00
1.5%1.5%1.5%700.50(TOP OF MULCH)
701.50(TOP OF MULCH)1.5%TC 701.36BC 700.86 TC 700.36BC 699.86
1.67%
1.65%
TC 699.50BC 699.00
TC 698.50BC 698.00698.59
FFE701.00/702.00
699.60
(TOP OF MULCH)
TC 697.50BC 697.00
+/- 8' RETAINING WALLTW 697.50BW 689.50
+/- 6' RETAINING WALLTW 696.00BW 690.00
1.5%1.5%3.0%2.67%
TC 705.10BC 704.60
705.50
1.5%1.5%1.5%1.5%2.67%
TC 707.63BC 707.13
708.00
707.85 705.55
1.5%1.5%3.0%3.0%
TC 703.02BC 702.522.0%705.27
TC 699.30BC 698.80
3.36%
699.55
700.00
1.37%1.37%7
.
0%5.0%697.50(TOP OF MULCH)
TC 696.65BC 696.15
TC 696.70BC 696.20
0.5%2.4%1.
5
%
696.50(TOP OF MULCH)
696.33
POTENTIAL OFFICE BASEMENT LEVEL.SITE STEPS/FIRE ACCESS TBD
EXIS 707.96
EXIS 708.00
EXIS 708.49
EXIS 709.58
EXIS 709.59
EXIS 708.06
EXIS 708.40
EXIS 709.00
EXIS 708.50
EXIS 708.20
FENCE. NO
CONNECTIONTO N BREVARD
1.5%1.5%698.753.0%699.00
701.98 ADJACENT
OPTIMIST HALL
DEVELOPMENT
BELMONT AVEN BREVARD STREET
PARKING DECK
SEE B + C STUDIO
PLANS FOR
COURTYARDDESIGN
SEE B + C STUDIO
PLANS FOR
COURTYARD +
BREEZEWAY
DESIGN
CLUB / AMENITY
EXISTING LIGHT RAIL
RAILROAD ROW
TOP OFCREEK BANK
10' SETBACK
10' SETBACKPROPERTY LINETOP O
F
CREEK
BANK
3
5
'
SW
IM

/
PO
S
T
CON
S
TRUC
T
ION
BU
FF
ER
CENTERLINE
PROPOSED
OFFICE PAD
BY OTHERS
10' BULID TO ZONE
16' SETBACK
MULTI FAMILY
RESIDENTIAL
697.98
697.98ACCESSIBLE DOORS
3
.
0
2%
697.86
TC 697.72BC 697.221.67%1.5%699.25(TOP OF MULCH)
708.604.0%1.5%1.5%1.5%1.5%TC 698.50BC 698.00
+/- 9' RETAINING WALLTW 701.00BW 692.00
+/- 9' RETAINING WALLTW 698.50BW 689.50
FFE709.00
FFE
708.00
FFE708.00
FFE706.00 FFE704.00 FFE703.00
FFE
702.00
FFE708.00SWALE CREATEDWITHIN SIDE YARD
SWALE CREATEDWITHIN SIDE YARD
TOP OF MULCH 708.50
EXIS 694.70 POTENTIAL OFFICE BASEMENT LEVEL.SITE STEPS/FIRE ACCESS TBD
+/- 9' RETAINING WALLTW 697.00BW 688.00
ALEXAN OPTIMIST
PARK II
TRAMMELL CROW RESIDENTIAL
3715 NORTHSIDE PARKWAY,
BUILDING 100, SUIT 200
ATLANTA, GA 30327
1020346
GRADING PLAN
N/A
LD
LD
LD
L-4.01
3/5/2021 4:19 PM HATTIE PAVLECHKO-REITER N:\_2020\1020346\CAD\DOCUMENTATION\1020346_PLN_GRAD.DWG
KEY MAP
SEAL
SHEET NUMBER
SHEET TITLE
LANDDESIGN PROJ.#
SCALE
PROJECT
NORTH
NO. DESCRIPTION DATE
REVISION / ISSUANCE
ORIGINAL SHEET SIZE: 24" X 36"
VERT:
HORZ:
CHECKED BY:
DRAWN BY:
DESIGNED BY:
223 NORTH GRAHAM STREETCHARLOTTE, NC 28202704.333.0325WWW.LANDDESIGN.COM
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
THESE DOCUMENTS ARE FOR DESIGNREVIEW ONLY AND NOT INTENDED FOR
CONSTRUCTION, BIDDING, OR PERMIT
PURPOSE. THEY ARE PREPARED BY, ORUNDER THE SUPERVISION OF:
ENGINEER DATE
PRELIMINARY-FOR REVIEW ONLY-
XXXXX XXXXXXXX #### 3/5/21
REG. #

----

########
##### ##
SCHEMATIC DESIGN 03/05/2021
15.00 14.00 13.00 12.00 11.00 10.00 9.00 8.00 7.00 6.00 5.00 4.00 3.00 2.00 1.00 ± .100 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00 7.00 8.00 9.00 10.00 11.00 12.00 13.00 14.00 15.00Job: 2021-03-15 OPTIMIST II AGTEKUnits: Ft-CYMon Mar 15, 2021 13:00:24 Page 1 Volume Report Subgrade vs. Stripped Area Volume Comp/Ratio Compact Export Change Total Cut Fill OnGrade Cut Fill Cut Fill Cut Fill -Import Per .1 Ft MF 100,393 43,017 42,304 15,072 5,967 3,874 1.00 1.15 5,967 4,455 1,512 428 OFFICE 14,146 2,209 11,882 55 380 4,006 1.00 1.15 380 4,607 -4,227 60 Regions Total 114,539 45,226 54,186 15,127 6,347 7,880 6,347 9,062 -2,715 488 Unspecified 39,459 8,190 30,955 314 1,022 4,433 1.00 1.15 1,022 5,098 -4,076 168 Job Total 153,998 53,416 85,141 15,441 7,369 12,313 7,369 14,160 -6,791 656 Plane Slope Stripping Qtys Area Area Depth Volume STRIPPINGS 153,998 156,413 1.000 5,793 Plane Slope Sectional Qtys Area Area Depth Volume MF 100,393 100,606 0.500 1,863 OFFICE 14,146 14,183 0.500 263 Sectional Total 114,539 114,789 2,126 OPTIMIST II03-/15/2021

Appendix C

Historical Analytical Data
•••
TABLE 5-14
I I I I I I I --
I ,
DETECTED VOCs IN GROUNDWATER
CGI CHARLOTTE
I I I
I I ---
I t--
Bromodi-Carbon 1,1-
Sample ID Date Acetone Benzene chloromethane 2-Butanone disulfide Chlorobenzene Chloroform Dichloroethane
(ug/L)(ug/L)(ug/L)(ug/L)(ug/L)(ug/L)(ug/L)I (ug/L)
i
I .~MW-1s 10/4/2001 U U U U U 11 D U U
MW-2s 10/4/2001 U U U U U U -U U
MW-3s 10/4/2001 U U U U U 3.3 0.42JB U
MW-4s 10/8/2001 U U U U U 3.6 I U I U
MW-5s 10/3/2001 U U U U U 0.6 1.5B U
MW-6s 10/3/2001 U U 0.85 U U U 43 U
U -MW-7i 10/4/2001 U U U U 2.2 JD 0.99 JDB 4.7 D
MW-7 DUPE 10/4/2001 U U U U U 2.4 JD 1.0 JDB 4.8 D
MW-8s 10/9/2001 U U U U U U 2B U
MW-9i 10/8/2001 U 0.48J U U U 17 U I UIMW-10d 10/8/2001 U 1.5 J U U 0.42J U U I U
MW-11 i 10/4/2001 13 J 0.70 J U U U U 0.41JB U
MW-12s 10/3/2001 U U U i U U U I U I U
MW-14i 10/9/2001 U U U U I U I U 3.5 UiIMW-16i 10/8/2001 60 U U ,7.4 J I U I U 0.80 JB UI
!I I I I
Preliminary Remediation Go.700 1 0.6 170 700 50 0.19 700
I I --U =Non detect
J =Estimated concentration,below practical quantitation limit.-~D =Indicated sample was diluted.---B =Constituent observed in blank;detection is suspect.
NA =Not available I --
P:\Proj\19678-CGI Supplemental Rls\OO 1-Charlotte\2002 Report\GW data\Table 5-14 10f2
•••
TABLE 5-14
I I I I I I .
DETECTED VOCs IN GROUNDWATER ----CGICHARLOTTE
I I I I I !II
ITrichloroethen~-
--
i
Dichloroethen Dichloroethen 4-Methyl-2-I Tetrachloroethe i
Sample ID I Date e e Ethylbenzene Pentanone ne Toluene e Xylene(total)
(ug/L) (ug/L)(ug/L)(ug/L)(ug/L)(uJl/L),(ug/L)Jug/L)
I -
I :-----
MW-1s 10/4/2001 4.7 JD U U U 380 D I U 200 D U
MW-2s I 10/4/2001 2.7 JD U U U 250 D U i 100 D U -
MW-3s 10/4/2001 1.1 J 2.2 U U 160 I U 76 U
MW-4s 10/8/2001 U 0.46J U U i 9.6 U 5.7 U
MW-5s 10/3/2001 U U U U I 21 I U 8.9 0.79 J
MW-6s 10/3/2001 U U U U U I U I U l_U---
MW-7i 10/4/2001 U U U U 380 D U 180 D U
MW-7 DUPE 10/4/2001 U 0.89 JD U U I 390 D I U 190 D U,--MW-8s 10/9/2001 U 12 U U 32 U 9.2 U----MW-9i 10/8/2001 U 0.55 J U 2.5 J 19 0.59 J 5.2 U-MW-10d 10/8/2001 U 42 U U I 4.2 0.79 J 3.7 3.4
MW-11 i 10/4/2001 U U 0.27 J 4.2 J 10 1.1 J 0.68 J I 3.2
MW-12s 10/3/2001 U I U U U I 1.8 U U I U
MW-14i I 10/9/2001 U I U U U 1.3 J U 1.8 J U
MW-16i 10/8/2001
I
U I U U U I U
I
0.64 J i 0.73 J I U
I -
I
Preliminary Remediation Go.7 70 29 --0.7 1000 2.8 530
I I J
U =Non detect I 1==I --
J =Estimated concentration,below practical quantitation limit.
D =Indicated sample was diluted.J I
--B =Constituent observed in blank;detection is suspect.
NA =Not available
P:\Proj\19678-CGI Supplemental Rls\001-Charlotte\2002 Report\GW data\Table 5-14 2oE2
•••
TABLE 5-15
I I i I I I I I i I I I I i I I
DETECTED VOCS IN SCREENING LEVEL GROUNDWATER
CGI CHARLOTTE
!i
I I I I 1,1-cis-1,2-1,2-
Tetrachloro II2-Chloro I Chloro Dichloro Dichloro Dichloropro Ethyl Trichloro Xylene
Location Sample Depth Sample Date Acetone Benzene I Butanone benzene form ethene ethene pane benzene Styrene ethene Toluene ethene (total)
(It bgs)(ug/L)(ug/L)(lJg/L)(ug/L) (ug/L)
I (ug/L) (ug/L)(lJg/L)(ug/L)(lJg/L)(ug/L)(ug/L),(ug/L)(ug/L)
I 0.27J~SLGW-1 I 16 It Nov-OO U U U U U U U U U U U ,·U-U
SLGW-2 11 It Nov-OO 8.2 0.37J"U U I U U U U 0.21J U U 0.64 I U 0.29J
SLGW-3 19 It Nov-OO U 0.37Jb U U U U U U U U U I 0,48J I IT 0.3J
SLGW-5 18 It Nov-OO U U U U U U U U U U 1.8 0.64 0.23J 0.27J
SLGW-5 Dup.18 It Nov-OO U 0,41JD U U U U U U U U 1.7 0.6 j-U 0.27J
SLGW-6 21 It Nov-OO U U U U U U U U U U I U I 0.7 I U 0.34J
SLGW-7 16 It Nov-OO 6.7 0.38J"U U 0.34J"U U U U U 2.1 0.68 1-0.95 0.25J
SLGW-9 18 It Nov-OO 26 0:61"U U U U U U U U 5.3 1.1 3.5 1
SLGW-10 26 It Nov-OO U U U 0.6 U 0.24J 0.33J U U U 31 0.93 24 0.67
SLGW-11 23 It Nov-OO U 0.33J"U U U U U U U U U 0.89 U 0.76
SLGW-12 26 It i Nov-OO U U U U U U U U I U u U 0.73B I U 0.57
SLGW-13 27 It Nov-OO U U U U U U U U U U U 0.57B I U U
SLGW-14 21 It Nov-OO 19 U U U U U U U U U U 0,45JB U I U
SLGW-16 20 It Jan-01 U U U 1.2 U 0.28J 0.88 U U U 35 U 37 U
SLGW-17 I 20 It Jan-01 U U U 1.0 U U U 0.87 U U 1.0 --U-8,4 U
SLGW-18 20 It Jan-01 6.1 U 3.1 U U U U U U U U 0.30 U I U
SLGW-20 20 It Jan-01 U U U U I 1.5"U U U U 0.78 0.72 0.87 0.35 0,41
SLGW-21 15.5 It Jan-01 U U 3.2 U U U U U U U U I 0.23 U I U
I 1 I I I !
Preliminary Groundwater Remediation Goals:700 1 170 50 0.19 7 70 0.56 29 100 0.7 1000 2.8 530
I I I I I I I I!
U -Undetected.I I
J -Detected at concentration below the EQL.Reported concentration is estimated.
1-__I
D -Sample was diluted for analysis.I i ==1l-I
Highlighted values exceed the Preliminary Groundwater Remediation Goal.I ,.
a -Note that the laboratorv was unable to achieve detection limits less than the NC 2L Standard for vinvl chloride,chloroform,cis-1 ,3-dichloropropene,trans-1,3-dichloropropene,bromoform,and
1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane.I I
I !"-Detected in equipment blanks.Presence in the sample is suspect.;.--
L III I I I
p:\projl19678100112002 Reportlt0515 1 of 1
•••
TABLE 5-16
I I I I I I c=
DETECTED SVOCs IN GROUNDWATER
CGI CHARLOTIE
:I I i I
I II
I IBis(2-Ethylhexyl)1,3-Dichloro-1,4-Dichloro-I 1,2-Dichloro-N-Nitroso-
Sample ID Date phthalate benzene benzene benzene Diethyl-phthalate diphenylamine
J (ug/L)(ug/L)(ug/L)(ug/L)I (ug/L)(ug/L)
I
--
MW-1s 10/4/2001 3.8 J U 5.4 59 U U
MW-2s 10/4/2001 4.6 J U U U U U
MW-3s 10/4/2001 I 120 D 3.6 J 12 160 D U U
MW-4s 10/8/2001 U U i U 9.7 U U
MW-5s 10/3/2001 U 8.4 31 370 D U U
MW-7i I 10/4/2001 6.8 6.4 23 250 D U U
MW-7 DUPE 10/4/2001 7 5 18 220 D U U
MW-8s 10/9/2001 9.9 B U U U U U
MW-9i 10/8/2001 U U 4.9 J 55 I U 6.4
MW-10d 10/8/2001 4.5 J U U 13 I 3.1 J 4.0J
MW-11 i*:--I NA NA NA NA NA NA
MW-13s 10/8/2001 5.4 U U U U U
MW-14i 10/9/2001 7.4 B U U I U U !U
MW-16i*--I NA NA NA I NA NA I NA
I I I I
Preliminary Remediation Goal 3 620 75 620 5000 0.0007
I I I I I
I!
*MW-11 i and MW-16i did not recover enough to obtain volume for SVOCs.-
U =Non detect --
J =Estimated concentration,below practical quantitation limit.----D =Indicated sample was diluted.-----B =Constituent observed in blank;detection is suspect.-----NA =Not available
P:\Proj\19678-CGI Supplemental Rls\001-Charlotte\2002 Report\GW data\Table 5-16 1 of 1
••
TABLE 5-17 I
I
DETECTED METALS IN GROUNDWATER
CGI CHARLonE
I I I I I
I !--/--!_-
I I
I
'Cadmium,
,
I Antimony,Arsenic,Beryllium,Chromium Hexavalent I Copper,
Sample 10 Date Antimony Soluble Arsenic Soluble Beryllium,Soluble Cadmium Soluble Chromium ,Soluble Chromium Copper Soluble
(uglL)(uglL)(uglL)(uglL) (uglL)I (uglL)(uglL)(uglL)(uglL)(uglL) (uglL)(ug/L) (ug/L)
MW-1s 10/4/2001 U U U U U U U U 160 120 U 360 48
MW-2s 10/4/2001 U U U U U U U U 74 53 43 34 U
MW-3s 10/4/2001 U U U U U U U U 180 120 U 570 57
MW-4s 10/8/2001 U U U U U U 2.5 U 64 37 I U 67 U
MW-5s 10/3/2001 U U U U U U U U 24 10 U 6 U
MW-6s 10/3/2001 U U U U U U U U 6.1 I U U U U
MW-7i 10/4/2001 U U U U U U U U 96 95 72 U U
MW-7 Dupe 10/4/2001 U U U U U U U U 95 95 72 U U
MW-8s 10/9/2001 U U U U U U U U 8200 8300 9200 120 110
MW-9i 10/8/2001 U U U U U U U U 33 I U U 38 U
MW-10d 10/8/2001 U U U U U U U U 22 14 U 55 37
MW-11i'10/4/2001 U NA 7.1 NA U NA 17 NA 67 NA NA 88 NA
MW-12s 10/3/2001 U U U U U U U U U U I U U U
MW-13s 10/8/2001 U U U U U U U U U U U I U U
MW-14i 10/9/2001 U U U U U U U U I U I U U 46 43
MW-15s 10/8/2001 U U U U U U U U U ,U U U U
MW-16i'10/8/2001 U NA 13 NA U NA I 1.7 NA 140 NA I U 81 NA
MW-16i 11/5/2001 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 15 5.2 U NA NA
I I I I I I
Preliminary Remediation G 6 6 50 50 4 4 5 5 50 50 -1000 1000
I I I I I I
I I
U =Non detect i I -I
NA -Not Analyzed !,
I I I i I 1I
'Mvv-111 and MW-161 did not recover enough on 10/B72001 to obtain volume for solu )Ie metals and
hexavalent chromium.Furthermore,the sample on 10/8/2001 was turbid and,therefore,resampled on
11/5/2001 for chromium Itotal and hexavalent).
•
P:IProjI19678-CGI Supplemental RlslOO1-ChariottelGroundwater TableslGW datalTable5-17 10f2
•••
TABLE 5-17
rIIiI I I ~----=-METALS IN GROUNDWATER --CGI CHARLonE,!1 i i I !I --;I !I I1
I I I
I I
I Lead,Mercury,Nickel,Selenium Silver,IThallium,Zinc,
Sample ID Date Lead Soluble Mercury Soluble Nickel Soluble Selenium ,Soluble Silver Soluble Thallium Soluble.Zinc Soluble I Cyanide
(uglL) (uglL)(uglL)(uglL)(uglL)(uglL)(uglL) (uglL) (uglL) (uglL)(uglL) (uglL)
!(uglL) (uglL)(ug/L)
--
I !--MW-1s 10/4/2001 8.9 U U
1 U 21 14 U U U U U U 93 36 U.
MW-2s 10/4/2001 7.1 U U U 6.6 U U U U U U J U 171 U U
MW-3s 10/4/2001 5.3 U U U 470 47 U U U U U U I 13 U U
MW-4s 10/8/2001 11 U U U 21 8.2 U U
I U U U U 78 U U
MW·5s 10/3/2001 U U U U U U U U U U U U I 13 U U
MW-6s 10/3/2001 U U U U U U U U U U U U U U
U-
MW-7i 10/4/2001 U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U
MW-7 Dupe 10/4/2001 U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U
MW-8s 10/9/2001 U U U U 14 14 U U U U U U 24 24 U
MW-9i 10/8/2001 5.4 U U U 18 5.1 U U 7.3 U I U U 42 U U
MW-10d 10/8/2001 U U U U 12 9.3 U U U U U U 33 22 U
NA 60 NA U NA U NA U NA -MW-11i*10/4/2001 22 NA U 100 NA NA
U U U 6.6 U U U U U U ---.!L U U U -MW-12s 10/3/2001 U
MW-13s 10/8/2001 U U U U 5.4 U U U U U U U U U U
U U U
_.-
U -U-r -U-MW-14i 10/9/2001 U U U U 16 15 27 27 U
MW·15s 10/8/2001 U U U U 8.1 7.2 U U U I U U U U Eti-u-MW-16i*I 10/8/2001 8.8 NA U I NA 43 NA 10 NA 1.7 I NA U I NA 27 ~.~,
MW-16i 11/5/2001 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA I NA NA I NA ~I NA NA NA NA
I I I I I
Preliminary Remediation G 15 15 1.1 1.1 100 100 50 50 18 18 2 2 2100 2100 154
I I I ,.I Ii-I--~.---i III i !I -U =Non detect I I 1 _I
NA =Not Analyzed !i --
1 -1,,--r--
-I --.----~---1-*fJW-j11 and MW-161 did not recover enough on 107872001 to 0 taln vOlume tor solut e metals and
Ihexavalentchromium.Furthermore,the sample on 10/8/2001 was turbid and,therefore,resampled on
111/5/2001 for chromium (total and hexavalent).I
P:IProjI19678-CGI Supplemental RlslOO1-CharlotlelGroundwalerTableslGW dalalTable5-17 20f2
••
TABLE5-18
I I
DETECTED VOCS -SURFACE WATER (PHASE II)
CGICHARLOTTE
I i IIIcis-1,2-I i
Sample Location Sample Date Dichloroethene Tetrachloroethene I Trichloroethene
(lJg/L)(lJg/L)(lJg/L)
I
SUR-2 Dec-DO U 1.2 0.33J
SUR-3 Dec-DO 0.24 J 14 2.7
SUR-3 Dup.Dec-DO 0.23 J 14 2.7
SUR-4 Dec-DO U 50 D 10 D
SUR-5 Dec-DO U 110 D 23 D
U -Undetected.
J -Detected at concentration below the EQL.Reported concentration is estimated.
-_.
D -Sample was diluted for analysis.II
E -Value estimated because of matrix interference.
Establishment of preliminary remediation goals for surface water is pending NCDENR determination.
•
p:\proj\19678\Charlotte\2002 Report\t0518
••
TABLE 5-19
I I
DETECTED SVOCS -SURFACE WATER (PHASE 11)
CGICHARLOTTE
Sample Location Sample Date 1,2-Dichlorobenzene
(lJg/L)
SUR-2 Dec-OO U
SUR-3 Dec-OO U
SUR-3 Dup.Dec-OO U
SUR-4 Dec-OO 3.2J
SUR-5 Dec-OO 8.4
U -Undetected.
J -Detected at concentration below the EQL.Reported concentration is estimated.
D -Sample was diluted for analysis.
E -Value estimated because of matrix interference.
Establishment of preliminary remediation goals for surface water is pending
NCDENR determination.
•
p:\proj\19678\Charlotte\2002 Report\t0519
•
•
•
TABLE 5-20
I
DETECTED METALS AND CYANIDE -SURFACE WATER (PHASE II)
CGICHARLOITE
Hexavalent
Sample Location Sample Date Chromium Chromium Copper Nickel
(1.l9/L)(l.lg/L)(l.lg/L)(1.l9/L)
SUR-1 Dec-DO NA NA NA NA
SUR-2 Dec-DO 7.4 B U 10.9 B 11 B
SUR-3 Dec-DO 47.5 U 33.9 53.3
SUR-3 Dup.Dec-DO 50.3 U 37.5 57
SUR-4 Dec-DO 63.6 U 93.2 83.8
SUR-5 Dec-DO 81 U 67.1 74.8
U -Undetected.
J -Detected at concentration below the EQL.Reported concentration is estimated.
D -Sample was diluted for analysis.
8 -Analyte detected in QAlQC blanks.Presence of constituent is suspect.
E -Value estimated because of matrix interference.
NA -Not analyzed.I I
Establishmentof preliminary remediation !loals forsurface water is pendin!l NCDENR determination.
p:\proj\19678\Charlotte\2002 Report\t0520
•••
TABLE 5-21
DETECTED VOCS -SEDIMENTS (PHASE II)
CGICHARLOTTE
!
,IIII cls-1,2-I
Sample Sample Carbon Chloro Dichloro 4-Methyl-2-Methylene Tetrachloro Trichloro
Location Interval Sample Date Acetone disulfide methane ethene pentanone chloride I ethene etheneI
(ft bgs)(mg/kg)(mg/kg)(mg/kg)(mg/kg)(mg/kg)(mg/kg)(mg/kg)(mg/kg)
SED-2 0-0.5 Dec-OO 0.024 B 0.018 U I U U 0.0046 JB U U
SED-3 0-0.5 I Dec-OO 0.023 B 0.012 U I U 0.0098 0.0054 B 0.017 0.0016 J
SED-3 Dup.0-0.5 Dec-OO 0.029 B 0.012 U U 0.0086 0.0056 B 0.012 U
SED-4 0-0.5 Dec-OO 0.1 B 0.0078 0.0051 0.0012 J 0.014 0.0054 B 0.091 0.01
SED-5 0-0.5 Dec-OO I 0.038 B
I
0.0088 0.0055 U 0.0079 0.0058 B 0.43 0.066
I I I
Preliminary Sediment Remediation Goals:320 72 1.2 8.6 158 8.9 5.7 2.8
I I I I I I IU-Undetected.
J -Detected at concentration below the EQL.Reported concentration is estimated.
D -Sample was diluted for analysis.I II
B -Analyte detected in QA/QC blanks.Presence of constituent is suspect.I
E -Analyte concentration exceeded highest standard concentration on the calibration curve.Reported concentration is estimated.
Highlighted values exceed the Preliminary Remediation Goal.a [~!
Ia-Note that the laboratory was unable to achieve detection limits less than the NC 2L Standard for vinyl chloride,chloroform,cis-1 ,3-dichloropropene,
trans-1 ,3-dichloropropene,bromoform,and 1,1 ,2,2-tetrachloroethane.
p:\proj\19678\Charlotte\2002 Report\t0521
•• •
TABLE 5-22
I I I I I I I I I I I I
I =:JI,
DETECTED SVOCS -SEDIMENTS (PHASE II)-CGI CHARLonE
I I I -.,-
Benzo(a)I Benzo(b)IBenzo(g,h,i)
I tJls(2-I Di-n-butyl !lndenO(1,2,3'Phen ISampleSampleBenzo(a)Benzo(k)I ethylhexyl)Di-n-octyl Fluor
Sample ID I Depth Date anthracene pyrene f1uoranthene perylene f1uoranthene'phthalate Chrysene phthalate I phthalate anthene cd)pyrene ~ene Pyrene
I (ft bgs)(mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg)(mg/kg)(mg/kg)(mg/kg)(mg/kg)I (mg/kg)I~mg/kg)(mg/kg)(mg/kg)(mg/kg)(mg/kg)
I I I I II ,
SED-2 0-0.5 I Jan-01 0.3 0.28 0.28 0.16 J 0.27 0.12 J I 0.32 0.2 JB I 0.15 J 0.62 I 0.19 J 0.38 I 0.51
SED-3 ,0-0.5 i Jan-01 UD UD I UD UD UD UD UD UD UD UD UD UD UD
SED-3 Dup.,0-0.5 Jan-01 UD UD I UD UD UD UD 0.45JD UD UD 0.84 JD UD UD I 0.69 JD
SED-4 I 0-0.5 Jan-01 0.48JD 0.42JD UD UD UD 0.47JD 0.49JD UD UD 1.1 D I UD j 0.88 JD 0.94 JD
SED-5 I 0-0.5 I Jan-01 UD UD I UD UD UD UD UD UD UD UD UD UD .-UD
I I I I I -II
Preliminary Sediment Remediation
Goals:0.62 0.062 0.62 --6.2 35 62 1200 --460 0.62 --460
I I I I I I I I
U -Undetected.1 I I
I
J -Detected at concentration below the EQL.Reported concentration is estimated.--I ---
D -Sample was diluted for analysis.I ---B -Analvte detected in QNQC blanks.Presence of constituent is suspect.
E -Value estimated because of matrix interference.I
NA -Not analyzed._L i
Highlighted values exceed the Preliminary Remediation Goal.i II I I I I
p:\proj\19678\Charlotte\2002Report\t0522
•• •
TABLE 5-23
!
DETECTED METALS·SEDIMENTS (PHASE II)
CGI CHARLOTTE
I
Sample Sample Sample Hexavalent
Location Depth Date Arsenic Cadmium Chromium Chromium Copper Cyanide Lead Nickel Silver Zinc
(ft bgs)I (mg/kg)(mg/kg)(mg/kg)(mg/kg)(mg/kg) (mg/kg)(mg/kg) (mg/kg)(mg/kg)(mg/kg)
i
SED-2 Jan-01 2.1 BN UN 65.8 *2.7 N 37.3 *0.47 N 36.7 *10.6 BN*0.41B 73.8 N
SED-3 I I Jan-01 UN UN 70.6 *3.2 N 66.5 *UN 435 *21.6 N*0.41B 51.7 N
SED-3 Dup.I
i Jan-01 2.7 BN UN 100 *2.7 N 85.5 *UN 97.8 *33.1 N*0.54 B 51.2 N
SED-4 Jan-01 1.7 BN UN 85.8 *7.1 N i 94.8 *UN 56.2 *56 N*U 58.2 NISED-5
I
Jan-01 1.7 BN 0.37 BN 143 *6N I 239 *0.28 BN 224 *54 N*U 110 N
I I
Preliminary Sediment Remediation
Goals:4.4 7.4 24,000 30 580 2.2 400 320 78 4600
I I !I i I '~-bU -Undetected.
J -Detected at concentration below the EQL.Reported concentration is estimated.
D -Sample was diluted for analysis.II
B -Analyte detected in QA/QC blanks.Presence of constituent is suspect.I I
E -Value estimated because of matrix interference.I I I
I*RPD or absolute difference for duplicate analysis not within control limits.r-..•~N -Prediqested spike recovery not within control limits.I
Hiqhliqhted values exceed the Preliminary Remediation Goal.
p:\proj\19678\Charlotle\Charlotle Analytical Data\t0523
Table 5
Groundwater Sample Analytical Results
Highland Park Mill Brownfields Site
E 16th Street at Parkwood Avenue
Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, NC
Terracon Project No. 71167407
Sample ID:GW-01 GW-03 GW-04 GW-06 GW-07 GW-09 GW-10
Sample Date: 09/23/16 09/23/16 09/23/16 09/23/16 09/23/16 09/23/16 09/23/16
Screen Interval (ft bgs):8-18 5-15 14-24 9-19 9-19 5-10 19-29
Chloroform 70 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 3.8 <1.0 <1.0
RCRA Metals by EPA Method 6010 Unfiltered Unfiltered Filtered Unfiltered Unfiltered Unfiltered Unfiltered Unfiltered Filtered Unfiltered Unfiltered
Arsenic 10 <10.0 <10.0 <10.0 14.7 <10.0 <10.0 <10.0 14.0 <10.0 <10.0 <10.0
Barium 700 741 67.6 59.0 290 1,450 77.3 236 664 127 147 53.7
Cadmium 2 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 4.8 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
Chromium 10 118 <5.0 <5.0 27 210 23.4 113 282 7.6 13.5 16.6
Lead 15 23.8 <5.0 <5.0 61.3 71.4 <5.0 5.3 74.6 7.7 8.1 <5.0
Selenium 20 11.8 <10 <10 <10.0 19.2 <10.0 <10.0 <10.0 <10.0 <10.0 <10.0
Notes:
Concentrations are reported in micrograms per liter (µg/L).
Only detected compounds are shown.
NCAC 2L GWQS - North Carolina Administrative Code Subchapter 2L Groundwater Quality Standards (April 1, 2013).
Concentrations highlighted in grey exceed their respective NCAC 2L GWQS
Not detected above laboratory reporting limits.
Analyte NCAC 2L
GWQS
Volatile Organic Compounds by EPA Method 8260
Semi-Volatile Organic Compounds by EPA Method 8270
GW-08
10-20
11/01/16
GW-02
11/01/16
12-22
<1.0 1.0
Table 6
Surface Water Sample Analytical Results
Highland Park Mill Brownfields Site
E 16th Street at Parkwood Avenue
Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, NC
Terracon Project No. 71167407
Sample ID:SW-01 SW-02 SW-03
Sample Date:09/20/16 09/20/16 09/20/16
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene NS 1.3 <1.0 <1.0
RCRA Metals by EPA Method 6010
Barium 200,000 110 63.3 72.2
Notes:
Concentrations are reported in micrograms per liter (µg/L).
Only detected compounds are shown.
NCAC 2B SWQS - North Carolina Administrative Code Subchapter 2B Surface Water Quality Standards, Human Health (June 30, 2016).
NS - no standard
Concentrations highlighted in grey exceed their respective NCAC 2B SWQS
Volatile Organic Compounds by EPA Method 8260
Semi-Volatile Organic Compounds by EPA Method 8270
Not detected above laboratory reporting limits.
Analyte NCAC 2B SWQS
Table 2
Soil Sample Analytical Results
Highland Park Mill Brownfields Site
E 16th Street at Parkwood Avenue
Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, NC
Terracon Project No. 71167407
Sample ID:SS-01*SS-01 SS-02 SS-03 SP-1 SP-2 CS-05 CS-05A CS-06 CS-06A CS-07 CS-07A CS-08 CS-08A CS-09 CS-09B CS-10 CS-10C
Sample Date:03/15/18 3/22/2018 3/22/2018 3/22/2018 5/23/2018 5/23/2018 10/04/2018 10/04/2018 10/04/2018 10/04/2018 11/01/2018 11/01/2018 11/01/2018 11/01/2018 12/03/2018 12/03/2018 12/03/2018 12/03/2018
Location/Area:Grit Tank /
Lagoon #2
Northwestern
Corner Fuel AST N Fuel AST S Stockpile Stockpile Stockpile Stockpile Stockpile Stockpile Stockpile Stockpile Stockpile Stockpile Stockpile Stockpile Stockpile Stockpile
Sample Interval (ft
bgs):Grab Grab 0-2 0-2 Grab Grab 0-4 Composite Sidewall Grab 0-4 Composite Sidewall Grab 0-4 Composite Sidewall Grab 0-4 Composite Sidewall Grab 0-4 Composite Sidewall Grab 0-4 Composite Sidewall Grab
Acetone 12000 140000 25 <0.425 0.0156J 0.0773J <0.0087 0.0297 J <0.130 NA <0.130 NA <0.0082 NA <0.0074 NA <0.0075 NA 0.0020J NA <0.0088
n-Butylbenzene 780 12,000 4.5 0.221 <0.0015 0.0044J <0.0016 <0.0045 <0.0065 NA <0.0065 NA <0.0015 NA <0.0013 NA <0.0013 NA <0.0017 NA <0.0016
sec-Butylbenzene 1,600 23,000 4.1 0.176J <0.0014 0.0048 0.0031J <0.0045 <0.0065 NA <0.0065 NA <0.0013 NA <0.0012 NA <0.0012 NA <0.0015 NA <0.0014
2-Butanone (MEK)5,500 40,000 17 <0.123 <0.0024 0.0086J <0.0025 <0.0896 <0.130 NA <0.130 NA <0.0024 NA <0.0022 NA <0.0022 NA <0.0027 NA <0.0025
Chlorobenzene 58 280 0.7 0.761 <0.0016 <0.0017 <0.0017 <0.0045 <0.0065 NA <0.0065 NA <0.0016 NA <0.0014 NA <0.0014 NA <0.0018 NA <0.0017
Chloroform 0.34 1.5 0.39 <0.068 <0.0014 <0.0014 <0.0014 0.0025 J 0.0021 J NA 0.0021 J NA <0.0013 NA 0.0014J NA 0.0014J NA <0.0015 NA <0.0014
1,4-Dichlorobenzene 2.8 12 0.12 0.089J <0.0014 <0.0015 <0.0015 <0.0045 <0.0065 NA <0.0065 NA <0.0014 NA <0.0014 NA <0.0013 NA <0.0016 NA <0.0015
Isopropylbenzene NS NS NS 0.187J <0.0033 0.0018J <0.0017 <0.0045 <0.0065 NA <0.0065 NA <0.0016 NA <0.0014 NA <0.0014 NA <0.0018 NA <0.0017
p-Isopropyltoluene NS NS NS <0.0722 <0.0014 0.0134 0.0118 <0.0045 <0.0065 NA <0.0065 NA <0.0014 NA <0.0013 NA <0.0013 NA <0.0016 NA <0.0015
Naphthalene 4.1 18 0.39 0.249 0.0511 0.0117 0.0084 <0.0045 0.0032 J NA 0.0032 J NA <0.00099 NA <0.00089 NA <0.0009 NA <0.0011 NA <0.0011
n-Propylbenzene 780 5,100 2.6 0.0804J <0.0014 0.0034J 0.0016J <0.0045 <0.0065 NA <0.0065 NA <0.0014 NA <0.0013 NA <0.0013 NA <0.0016 NA <0.0015
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 63 370 12 <0.085 <0.0017 0.0155 0.019 <0.0045 <0.0065 NA <0.0065 NA <0.0016 NA <0.0015 NA <0.0015 NA <0.0017 NA <0.0018
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 56 320 11 <0.0765 <0.0015 0.0132 0.016 <0.0045 <0.0065 NA <0.0065 NA <0.0015 NA <0.0013 NA <0.0013 NA <0.0017 NA <0.0016
Total Xylenes 120 530 9.9 <0.153 <0.003 0.0049J 0.0053J <0.0045 <0.0065 NA <0.0065 NA <0.003 NA <0.0027 NA <0.0027 NA <0.0034 NA <0.0032
Acenaphthene 720 9000 16 <0.109 2.66 <0.0953 <0.0938 0.241 J 0.142 J <0.467 NA 0.886 NA 0.482 NA <0.0915 NA <0.0671 NA <0.0983 NA
Acenaphthylene NS NS NS <0.112 1.3 <0.0979 <0.0963 0.109 J <0.372 <0.48 NA <0.101 NA 0.223J NA <0.0939 NA <0.0986 NA <0.101 NA
Anthracene 3600 45000 1300 <0.106 6.55 <0.0928 <0.0913 0.977 0.38 <0.455 NA 0.823 NA 1.51 NA 0.219J NA <0.0936 NA <0.0957 NA
Benzo(a)anthracene 1.1 21 0.35 0.213J 11.1 0.542 0.266J 2.97 0.946 <0.375 NA 1.43 NA 6.1 NA 0.677 NA 0.187J NA <0.0789 NA
Benzo(a)pyrene 0.11 2.1 0.21 0.19J 8.86 0.207J 0.189J 2.42 0.797 <0.387 NA 1.23 NA 6.58 NA 0.6 NA 0.161J NA <0.0815 NA
Benzo(b)fluoranthene 1.1 21 1.2 0.25J 11.9 0.337J 0.285J 3.34 1.12 <0.35 NA 1.45 NA 8.41 NA 0.776 NA 0.222J NA <0.737 NA
Benzo(k)fluoranthene 11 210 12 <0.0935 3.64 0.142J 0.121J 1.15 0.448 <0.4 NA 0.631 NA 2.75 NA 0.297J NA 0.0966J NA <0.0841 NA
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene NS NS NS 0.132J 5.34 <0.0105 <0.104 1.68 0.506 <0.516 NA 0.711 NA 4.32 NA 0.4 NA 0.122J NA <0.109 NA
Benzyl Alcohol 1300 16,000 3.4 <0.0949 <0.0815 <0.0828 <0.0814 0.128 J <0.744 <0.406 NA <0.0857 NA <0.0781 NA <0.0795 NA <0.0834 NA <0.0854 NA
Butylbenzylphthalate 290 1,200 290 <0.101 <0.0864 <0.0878 <0.0864 <0.362 0.206 J <0.43 NA <0.0909 NA <0.0829 NA <0.0843 NA <0.0885 NA <0.0905 NA
Chrysene 110 2100 36 0.233J 8.14 0.473 0.237J 2.93 0.932 <0.271 NA 1.12 NA 5.79 NA 0.691 NA <0.222J NA <0.0569 NA
Di-n-butylphthalate 1300 16000 35 0.223J <0.0667 <0.0667 <0.0666 <0.362 2.34 <0.332 NA <0.0701 NA <0.0639 NA <0.065 NA <0.0683 NA <0.0698 NA
Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 0.11 2.1 0.38 <0.101 1.35 <0.0878 <0.0864 0.452 0.143 J <0.43 NA 0.251J NA <0.0829 NA <0.0843 NA <0.0885 NA <0.0905 NA
Dibenzofuran 15 210 10 <0.0777 2.88 <0.0677 <0.0666 0.246 J 0.116 J <0.332 NA 0.318J NA 0.249J NA 0.0708J NA <0.0683 NA <0.0698 NA
Di-n-octylphthalate 130 1600 560 <0.0992 0.102J <0.0866 <0.0851 <0.362 <0.372 <0.424 NA <0.0896 NA <0.0817 NA <0.0831 NA <0.0872 NA <0.0892 NA
Bis (2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate 39 160 14 4.11 <0.111 <0.113 <0.111 <0.362 255 <0.553 NA <0.117 NA <0.107 NA <0.108 NA <0.114 NA <0.116 NA
Fluoranthene 480 6,000 670 0.539 27.4 0.355J 0.201J 6.15 2.14 0.320J NA 2.89 NA 11.1 NA 1.32 NA 0.438 NA <0.0621 NA
Fluorene 480 6,000 110 <0.0978 4.1 <0.0853 <0.0839 0.216 J 0.162 J <0.418 NA 0.5 NA 0.368J NA <0.0819 NA <0.086 NA <0.0879 NA
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 1.1 21 3.9 0.11J 4.83 <0.0853 <0.0839 1.49 0.473 <0.418 NA 0.697 NA 3.8 NA 0.339J NA 0.104J NA <0.0879 NA
1-Methylnaphthalene 18 73 0.11 0.149J 0.934 <0.108 0.132J NA NA <0.529 NA <0.112 NA 0.207J NA <0.104 NA <0.109 NA <0.111 NA
2-Methylnaphthalene 48 600 3.1 0.195J 1.52 0.113J 0.153J 0.123 J 0.129 J <0.437 NA 0.132J NA 0.231J NA 0.111J NA <0.0898 NA <0.0918 NA
Naphthalene 4.1 18 0.39 <0.116 4.03 <0.102 <0.1 0.108 J 0.118 J <0.498 NA 0.526 NA 0.337J NA 0.132J NA <0.102 NA <0.105 NA
Phenanthrene NS NS 134 0.295J 24.6 0.14J 0.131J 3.18 1.47 <0.338 NA 3.07 NA 4.83 NA 0.89 NA 0.396J NA <0.0711 NA
Pyrene 360 4,500 440 0.303J 19.1 0.299J 0.163J 3.16 1.45 <0.334 NA 2.43 NA 9.68 NA 1.23 NA 0.406J NA <0.0724 NA
0.68 3.0 5.8 5.4 4.8 NA NA 8.4 8.3 4.3 NA 3.3 NA <0.52 NA <0.40 NA <0.44 NA <0.46 NA
3,100 47,000 580 154 142 NA NA 140 138 103 NA 116 NA 110 NA 96 NA 87.6 NA 115 NA
14 200 3 8.4 0.24 NA NA 2.2 1.8 0.45 NA 0.15 NA 1.1 NA 0.42 NA 0.12 NA 0.47 NA
23,000 350,000 360,000 511 47.9 NA NA 40 34.6 55.1 NA 42.7 NA 45.7 NA 42.7 NA 49 NA 68.5 NA
400 800 NS 522 71.4 NA NA 50.9 55.7 18.9 NA 16.9 NA 32.4 NA 29.1 NA 22.1 NA 46.9 NA
2.3 9.7 1 0.34 0.038 NA NA 0.026 0.038 0.061 NA 0.031 NA 0.079 NA 0.39 NA 0.045 NA 0.17 NA
78 1,200 2.1 2.3 <0.41 NA NA 2.9 2.4 <0.46 NA <0.42 NA <0.52 NA <0.40 NA <0.44 NA <0.46 NA
78 1,200 3.4 38.2 <0.20 NA NA <0.34 <0.51 <0.23 NA <0.21 NA <0.26 NA <0.20 NA <0.22 NA <0.23 NA
Notes:
All results are shown in milograms per kilogram (mg/kg).
ft bgs - Feet Below Ground Surface
NS - No Standard
NA-Not Analyzed
PSRG - NCDEQ Inactive Hazardous Sites Branch Preliminary Soil Remediation Goals, updated February 2018.
Concentrations highlighted in yellow exceed their respective residential PSRG.
Concentrations highlighted in orange exceed their respective non-residential PSRG.
Concentrations highlighted in gery exceed their respective Protection of Groundwater PSRG.
Total chromium is assumed to consist exclusively of trivalent chromium. Historical site operations do not indicate the use of hexavalent chromium.
Lead
Mercury
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Selenium
Silver
Arsenic
Protection of
Groundwater
Volatile Organic Compounds by EPA Method 8260
RCRA Metals by EPA Method 6010 and 7471
Semi-Volatile Organic Compounds by EPA Method 8270
Analyte Residential
PSRGs
Industrial
/Commercial
PSRGs
MW-8
PCE I <0.001
TCE <0.002
CHLOROFORM <0.001
WOODED AREA
MW-9
'=._CE I <0.001
TCE <0.002
CHLOROFORM <0.001
VACANT
PROPERTY
" ~-
·-......
MW-7
PCE <0.001
TCE I <0.002
CHLORoFORM <0.001
~
MW-7 v , __.....
-·-. -·-. -·-. MW-4 -......
PCE I 0.0018
TCE 0.00061J
CHLOROFORM 0.00085J
WOODED AREA
MW-6
PCE I <0.001
TCE <0.002
CHLOROFORM <0.001
MW-5
PCE <0.001
TCE <0.002
CHLOROFORM 0.018
RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES
MW-1
PCE !1&001
TCE <0.002
CHLOROFORM 0.~
-· -• -· -STREAM
-- ---PROPERlY BOUNDARY
• MONITORING WELL LOCATION
WELL ID MW-3
PCE 0.00.!!_
TCE 0.0007J
CONSTITUENT
""-C,_,HL""O'-"ROo<.<.F~OR~M!!-...::><0~.00!!.!1---'"--03/05/09 CONCENTRATION IN mg/L
(BOLD EXCEEDS NC 2L STANDARD)
@
APPROXIMATE
0 30 60
SCALE IN FEET
CONTAMINANT CONCENTRATION MAP
GAY LAUNDRY AND CLEANERS
DSCA # 60-0044
11 01 N. BREVARD STREET
CHARLOTTE, MECKLENBURG COUNTY
& Hickman 2923 South T !Jon Street-Suite 100
Charlotte, North Carolina 28203
A PAOFEBOION.O.L CORPORATION 704-586-0007(p) 704-58(,.0373{1)
DATE: 06-01-09 REVISION NO. 1
JOB NO. DS0-05 FIGURE NO. 5
)
i
!Table 5: Analytical Data for Groundwater
IDSCA lD No.: 1\tLnM&
c '(3
"'-
01) ·= 0. E "' <ll ... ~ ~ ..,
§
8 0
TWP-1
TWP-2
fWP-3
11/08/07
11/08/07
11/08/07
II I
' ,,, ,,
,,
... c: "' -= 0 8 0 :;:
(.)
9
"
... c: ... >.. -= 0 8 0 :;:
(.)
9
''" I I"
""' I 0
1/08/07 I I '' ' I
MW-1 09/04/08 II
12103/08 I '
03/05/09 ' I
1/08/07 ' I I
MW-2 09/04/08 " I I I
12/03/08 ' I II I ' ' o I • OIHI
03/05/09 I I I( I ''' I o I I 14 I
11 /08/07 I II •I I I •I "
MW-3 09/04/08 •l.lolll I •I 1\ll IH/( 1'1 I "oul
12/03/08 IIHII ' 1•11 11111 I , 11011 I( Ill d
03/05/09 'Ill I '" >I " " I I II II II" II
11 /08/07 ' '" I ' ' " I I old I 1111111
_()_9_/()4/08 1111 \II'
MW-4
I Ill I IH I'll(
12103/08 I 1• 'Ill ,I,, I II" I I llol
03/05/09 1\ tl I ot 'I ·I
09/04/08 I • I I I" I
MW-5 12103/08 I' l I
03/05/09 I I I I o
MW-6 12/03/08 • I, I I II o 1
03/05/09 '" I 'I "I I II 1\
()9~04/08 ooll I o..O( I 1"1 ' "I
MW-7 12/03/08 I ,1, ""'" ,, It! II /Ill lpo.l I o II
03/05/09 llo•lll .(I •II 11\1111 11\11/i ·'"II 1111111
fm:¥Ll
(. ' I I I 0.00153 ll
'I'" I• I I 0.00167 I
I 0.0044
I" I I 0.02 17 I
I 0.013 ,,
' 0.015
I 0.012 I
0.0015
I0.00064J
'II I I'" I
I ,/I '' II I ' I ' I
'IIHI 0.0016 II 1
I' II/ I I 1111 I I0.00098J " I
""II • ' I 11( 0.0011 lo\ll
111111 • I " 'I Ill "II I ol
llld 1 ' I 0.0016 1•111
I"' I \1 I 0.0015 I
I 10 I 0.00 14 I
1.1 I I 0.00085J ' I
,, • 0.026
I . I I 0.027
I" O.ot8
I I' I 0.0073 I
'"I \ ' I •
ol '"" I d Ill
1/(1011 1111/l I o II Ill >(
I (Ill( <I II 1l I I I'" I
... ... -= <l ... c: ~ ~
i h i ~
... c: ... >.. ..<: <l 8 0 :;:
(.)
~
• • • • I o.oo-'91 o.oo11s
I o.oo583 • I o.oo2o2
" . I
I I
,, I
0.009 I 0.0034
0.0043 I o.oolsJ
I 0.0013 I • 0.0006J '
0.0017 I lo.0006 1J
I 111 I 1 1 ' 0.0084 ol I •II 0.0032 I
I I I II II I" 0.0059 '"I I 'II 0.002J
\1 ;;, I (I i I( IIIII/( 0.004 I 'Oil( 1 "" l o.oo t7J , ~~·
111 11,1 1 I 0.0018 II' ' I i 0.0007J I 'I '
'II .,,, 0.0059 I I( •' I 0.0023 o I
I 'I 0 0 O ' 0.0051 I o I ' I 0.0017J
' ' 0.0037 '0.0014J
I ,, '" 0.0018 ' 10.0006 1
I
I I
I '
I I • I 1.1
ot I o II
"I '. II 'I I"" 'I I II I II
'I oo! I I' 11 I I .1( 01 •I j '''" 1 1 H "I I o,
s: :;:: ..0 s: :;:: Oo Groundwater Sampling Point Sampling Date (mm/dd/yy) I, I, 1-Trichloroethane I, I ,2,2-Tetrachloroethane , I ,2-Trichloroethanae , 1-Dichloroethane , 1-Dichloroethylene 1.2-Dichloroethylene
~S{fu An>llvtical~ ~rn mcl~r (User ~nPI'ifiP.rl rhPmiral~) :::.1:•1 .. ,.111
IDSCA m No.. ,;o_oo.s.s
c :§ ., ·c; c Q.. "' ..<: Cll '0 ., .., .: ~ c:: E 0.. ., c:: ::> 0 E E. g ...
0 "' ::> (/) ... >. c;:: ... ;;; 0.. 0 ... Cl e ... ;;; 0 Cll 0.. ~ 1 0 u '0 (/)
J 6. ·c
[m:VL]
TWP-1 11/08/07 " I I'< I
TWI'-2 11 /08/07 II' •I
TWP-3 11/08/07 I ... I I
11/08/07 I
09/04/08 '• I MW-1
12/03/08
~
11/08/07 ' "
MW-2 09/04/08 I '
12/03/08 I I. 1'1
03/05/09 ,, ' 1111
I~ ' ,,q 'I I
MW-3 09/04/08 II II Ill''
12/03/08 ""''' "''
03/05/09 I <I lllllf
11/08/07 PI "' ...
MW-4 09/04/08 " I '
12/03/08 "
Q31()51<>2_ ' I '
09/04/08 <I
MW-5 12/03/08 I I
03/05/09
MW-6 ~ ~
03/05/09 I ' '
09/04/08 1 o.ooo62J I I
MW-7 12/03/08 I lol I ' ''
~~2_ ,, •I I""
;:
~ 0 ·c; "' Q.. "' ~ ..::: ell 0 v .: ] "' E c.. 0 "' e E 5 ] 0 "' "' Vl 0 >, c::: ... ;;; c. e 0 Cl e ;;; 0 c. :;: ?.: 0 ~ u •t:
Table 10: Analytical Data for Sub-Slab VaporDSCA ID No.: 60-00501,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2-Dichloroethane (EDC)BenzeneBenzo(a)pyreneCarbon tetrachlorideChloroformcis-1,2-dichloroethyleneEthylbenzeneMethyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE)NaphthaleneTetrachloroethyleneToluenetrans-1,2-DichloroethyleneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes (Total)VMP-14.5" 09/25/09NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA <0.13 NA NA NA14NA <0.64 <0.17 <0.041 NAVMP-24.5" 09/25/09NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA <0.12 NA NA NA45NA <0.61 <0.17 <0.04 NA-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- NE -- -- -- 21 -- 2,600* 61 28 --ADT 10Notes:1. NA - Not Analyzed; NE - Not Established2. Bold concentrations exceed EPA Regional Screening Level (RSL) with 10X dilution.3. Helium gas was used to perform a leak check on each subslab vapor monitoring point (VMP). No helium was detected during either leak checks.4. Sample was collected into a 6-L SIM certified Summa cannisters. A SIM certified flow controller was used to regulate the duration of sample collection to 1 hour. 5. Sample was analyzed using Modified EPA Method TO-15 GC/MS SIM.* Indicates Non-cancer Hazard Index screening level; all other RSLs are Carcinogenic Target Risk screening levels.Sample IDDepth[feet bgs]Sampling Date (mm/dd/yy)[μg/m3]EPA RSL for Industrial Air with 10x DilutionPage 1 of 1
Table 11: Analytical Data for Ambient AirDSCA ID No.: 60-00501,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2-Dichloroethane (EDC)BenzeneBenzo(a)pyreneCarbon tetrachlorideChloroformcis-1,2-dichloroethyleneEthylbenzeneMethyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE)NaphthaleneTetrachloroethyleneToluenetrans-1,2-DichloroethyleneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes (Total)IAS-1 (upstairs)09/23/09NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA <2.7 NA NA NA810NA <142,200<0.87 NAIAS-2 (downstairs)09/23/09NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA <0.14 NA NA NA0.37NA <0.690.36<0.045 NAIAS-3 (upstairs)10/29/09NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA <0.12 NA NA NA1.1NA <0.60.49<0.039 NAIAS-4 (upstairs)10/29/09NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA <0.14 NA NA NA1.0NA <0.690.43<0.045 NAIAS-5 (downstairs)10/29/09NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA <0.13 NA NA NA1.1NA <0.640.35<0.041 NAIAS-6 (downstairs)01/16/10NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA <0.11 NA NA NA2.0NA <0.562.1<0.036 NAIAS-7 (upstairs)01/17/10NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA <0.11 NA NA NA0.32NA <0.530.18<0.034 NAIAS-8 (upstairs)01/17/10NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA <0.11 NA NA NA0.43NA <0.530.18<0.034 NAIAS-9 (upstairs)02/23/10NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA <0.11 NA NA NA0.28NA <0.54 <0.15 <0.035 NAIAS-10 (downstairs)02/23/10NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA <0.11 NA NA NA1.7NA <0.18 <0.15 <0.035 NABAS-1 (outdoor)09/23/09NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA <0.13 NA NA NA8.1NA <0.6715<0.043 NABAS-2 (outdoor)10/29/09NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA <0.14 NA NA NA0.67NA <0.690.52<0.045 NABAS-3 (outdoor)10/29/09NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA <0.13 NA NA NA1.2NA <0.670.58<0.043 NABAS-4 (outdoor)01/16/10NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA <0.13 NA NA NA1.3NA <0.641.5<0.041 NABAS-5 (outdoor)01/16/10NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA <0.12 NA NA NA1.4NA <0.631.4<0.04 NA-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- NE -- -- -- 2.1 -- 260* 6.1 2.8 --Notes:1. NA - Not Analyzed; NE - Not Established2. Bold concentrations exceed EPA Regional Screening Level (RSL).3. Samples were analyzed using Modified EPA Method TO-15 GC/MS SIM.4. Samples were collected into 6-L SIM certified Summa cannisters. A SIM certified flow controller was used to regulate the duration of sample collection to 8 hours. 5. IAS - Indoor Air Sample, BAS - Background Air Sample* Indicates Non-cancer Hazard Index screening level; all other RSLs are Carcinogenic Target Risk screening levels.EPA RSL for Industrial AirADT 11Sample IDSampling Date (mm/dd/yy)[μg/m3]Page 1 of 1

Appendix D

Brownfields Soil Management Options Letter

October 31, 2018
Sent Via E-mail
Mr. Jay Levell White Point Paces Partners, LLC 4300 Paces Ferry Road SE, Suite 500
Atlanta, Georgia 30339
[e-mail]
Subject: Brownfields Soil Management Options Highland Park Mill Brownfield Property
Charlotte, Mecklenburg County
Brownfields Project No. 20005-16-060 Dear Mr. Levell:
The North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) Brownfields Program received
a request to export fill from the Highland Park Mill Brownfields Property (20005-16-060), owned by White Point Paces Partners, LLC. This request was submitted on your behalf by Mr. Chris Corbitt, PG of Terracon Consultants, Inc. on October 16, 2018 via the Composite Soil Sample
Analytical Results Summary and Soil Export Request letter. Transfer to another Brownfields
property was subsequently approved; however, per recent phone conversations with Mr. Corbitt the transfer of soils associated with CS-05 samples to another brownfields property was no longer an option. DEQ Brownfields and Solid Waste Section reviewed the provided stockpile sampling results as well as previously collected soil samples for arsenic from the Reeves Land Clearing and
Inert Debris Landfill. Based upon our review, the stockpiled soils may be managed as follows:

• Soils associated with samples CS-05/CS-05A may be managed at the Reeves LCID Landfill, or another LCID Landfill with background arsenic concentrations similar to those identified at the Brownfields Property, a Construction & Demolition (C&D) Landfill,
Municipal Solid Waste (MSW) Landfill, or at another Brownfields Property with prior
DEQ Brownfields approval.
• Soils associated with the samples CS-06/CS-06A may be managed at a MSW Landfill, or at another Brownfields Property with prior DEQ Brownfields approval.
Per the Highland Park Mill EMP, the soils will be field screened during excavation prior to export from the property. If unanticipated impacts are identified during excavation, please refer to the EMP for further actions and cease transfer until appropriate characterization can be completed.
Mr. Jay Levell October 31, 2018
Page 2
In accordance with the site’s approved EMP, an annual Redevelopment Summary Report will be submitted to DEQ Brownfields. Details related to the disposition of this soil including but not limited to, total volume, general description of field screening efforts, etc. should be included with
the Redevelopment Summary Report.
Please be advised that this approval does not waive any applicable requirement to obtain any necessary permits, licenses or certifications which may be required from other state or local entities. If you have questions about this correspondence or require additional information, please
feel free to contact Joselyn Harriger by phone at 704-235-2195 or by email at
[e-mail], or Ervin Lane by phone at 919-707-8288 or by email at [e-mail]. Sincerely,
Joselyn Harriger Ervin Lane Project Manager Compliance Hydrogeologist Brownfields Program Solid Waste Section
ec: Chris Corbitt, Terracon Chris Walker, K&L Gates

Appendix E

Reeves and Old 27 LCID Landfill Background Soil Sample Data
Table 1
Summary of Soil Analytical Data
Yandle-Witherspoon Supply, Inc.
Charlotte, North Carolina
H&H Job No. WPP-014
Evaluation Area
Sample ID EX-1 EX-2 EX-3 EX-4 EX-5 EX-6 EX-7 BG-OL27-1 BG-OL27-2 BG-OL27-3 BG-OL27-4 BG-OL27-5
Date
Depth (ft bgs)0-4
Sample Type Range Mean Range Mean
Units
Metals (6020B/7471B/7199)
Arsenic 1.41 1.67 3.85 7.19 0.899 J 1.02 J 1.89 1.6 2.7 1.2 2.2 1.7 5.8 0.68 3.0 --1.0 - 18 4.8 1.1 - 3.0 2.3
Barium 96.5 43.8 429 115 63.1 137 79.4 64 160 220 90 96 580 3,100 47,000 --50 - 1,000 356 38 - 110 74
Cadmium <0.106 <0.101 <0.112 <0.101 <0.100 <0.0969 0.133 J <0.048 <0.050 <0.045 <0.051 <0.046 3 14 200 --1.0 - 10 (3)4.3 (3)ND - 0.36 J 0.13
Chromium (total)94.2 58.6 121 18.8 76.2 59.8 52.9 37 39 45 90 51 NE NE NE --7.0 - 300 65 14 - 45 31.3
Chromium (VI)0.700 J 0.450 J 0.737 J <0.301 0.568 J 0.576 J 0.466 J 0.34 J <0.27 0.44 J 2.0 0.62 J 3.8 0.31 6.5 --NS NS 0.34 J - 0.98 J 0.62
Chromium (III)93.5 58.2 120.3 18.8 75.6 59.2 52.4 36.6 39 44.6 70 50.4 360,000 23,000 350,000 --NS NS 13.7 - 44.0 30.7
Lead 6.95 15.8 31.9 9.93 14.0 7.52 33.0 11 18 6.6 12 12 270 400 800 --ND - 50 16 11 - 36 20.7
Mercury 0.0260 J 0.0575 0.104 <0.0213 <0.0211 <0.0204 0.0725 0.044 J 0.041 J 0.032 J 0.074 0.037 J 1 4.7 70 --0.03 - 0.52 0.121 0.024 J - 0.097 0.074
Selenium 0.374 J 1.07 J 0.752 J 0.432 J 0.333 J 0.304 J 0.485 J 1.2 J 4.1 3.4 1.4 2.1 2.1 78 1,200 --<0.1 - 0.8 0.42 ND ND
Silver <0.107 <0.102 <0.113 <0.0651 <0.101 <0.0980 <0.102 <0.067 <0.069 <0.062 <0.071 <0.064 3.4 78 1,200 --ND - 5.0 (3)NS 0.033 J - 0.60 0.60
Metals (6010D TCLP)
Chromium NA NA <0.0330 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA ------5 mg/L --------
Notes:
1) North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) Inactive Hazardous Sites Branch (IHSB) Preliminary Soil Remediation Goals (PSRGs) dated June 2021
2) Range and mean values of background metals for North Carolina soils taken from Elements in North American Soils by Dragun and Chekiri, 2005
3) Cd and Ag concentrations were taken from Southeastern and Conterminous U.S. Soils.
4) Background metals data collected from Cotton Warehouse Brownfields property (Brownfields Project No. 24013-20-060)
5) Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Maximum Concentration of Contaminants for Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure (TCLP) regulatory level dated November 2004
Soil concentrations are reported in milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg).
Compound concentrations are reported to the laboratory method detection limits.
Laboratory analytical methods are shown in parentheses.
With the exception of metals, only constituents detected in at least one sample are shown in the table above.
ft bgs= feet below ground surface; mg/L = milligrams per liter
NA = not analyzed; NS = not specified; NE = not established; -- = not applicable
J = Compound was detected above the laboratory method detection limit, but below the laboratory reporting limit resulting in a laboratory estimated concentration.
mg/kg
Grab
0-2
12/17/2020 Maximum
Concentration
for TCLP (5)
Regional Background Metals in
Soil (2)
Background Metals in Nearby
Brownfield Properties (4)Protection of
Groundwater
PSRG (1)
Residential
PSRGs (1)
Industrial/
Commercial
PSRGs (1)
Screening Criteria Old 27 LCID LandfillProposed Area of Cut
4/27/2021
Composite
0-5
4/26/2021
https://harthick.sharepoint.com/sites/MasterFiles-1/Shared Documents/AAA-Master Projects/White Point Partners (WPP)/WPP-014 Yandle Witherspoon/Brownfields Assessment/Report/Tables/Data Tables.xlsx
Table 1 (Page 1 of 2)
Hart & Hickman, PC
Table 1
Summary of Soil Analytical Data
Yandle-Witherspoon Supply, Inc.
Charlotte, North Carolina
H&H Job No. WPP-014
Evaluation Area
Sample ID EX-1 EX-2 EX-3 EX-4 EX-5 EX-6 EX-7 BKG-R-01 BKG-R-02 BKG-R-03 BKG-R-04 BKG-R-05
Date
Depth (ft bgs)0-4
Sample Type Range Mean Range Mean
Units
Metals (6020B/7471B/7199)
Arsenic 1.41 1.67 3.85 7.19 0.899 J 1.02 J 1.89 3.0 1.9 2.6 2.2 1.9 5.8 0.68 3.0 --1.0 - 18 4.8 1.1 - 3.0 2.3
Barium 96.5 43.8 429 115 63.1 137 79.4 120 77 J 91 J 130 150 580 3,100 47,000 --50 - 1,000 356 38 - 110 74
Cadmium <0.106 <0.101 <0.112 <0.101 <0.100 <0.0969 0.133 J 0.13 J 0.075 J <0.044 0.10 J <0.047 3 14 200 --1.0 - 10 (3)4.3 (3)ND - 0.36 J 0.13
Chromium (total)94.2 58.6 121 18.8 76.2 59.8 52.9 58 36 46 47 58 NE NE NE --7.0 - 300 65 14 - 45 31.3
Chromium (VI)0.700 J 0.450 J 0.737 J <0.301 0.568 J 0.576 J 0.466 J <0.24 0.28 J <0.24 0.43 J 0.33 J 3.8 0.31 6.5 --NS NS 0.34 J - 0.98 J 0.62
Chromium (III)93.5 58.2 120.3 18.8 75.6 59.2 52.4 57.76 35.72 45.76 46.57 57.67 360,000 23,000 350,000 --NS NS 13.7 - 44.0 30.7
Lead 6.95 15.8 31.9 9.93 14.0 7.52 33.0 15 10 12 29 6.7 270 400 800 --ND - 50 16 11 - 36 20.7
Mercury 0.0260 J 0.0575 0.104 <0.0213 <0.0211 <0.0204 0.0725 0.097 0.030 J 0.047 J 0.070 0.055 J 1 4.7 70 --0.03 - 0.52 0.121 0.024 J - 0.097 0.074
Selenium 0.374 J 1.07 J 0.752 J 0.432 J 0.333 J 0.304 J 0.485 J 6.4 4.8 6.1 4.9 5.9 2.1 78 1,200 --<0.1 - 0.8 0.42 ND ND
Silver <0.107 <0.102 <0.113 <0.0651 <0.101 <0.0980 <0.102 0.54 J <0.055 <0.061 0.11 J <0.065 3.4 78 1,200 --ND - 5.0 (3)NS 0.033 J - 0.60 0.60
Metals (6010D TCLP)
Chromium NA NA <0.0330 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA ------5 mg/L --------
Notes:
1) North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) Inactive Hazardous Sites Branch (IHSB) Preliminary Soil Remediation Goals (PSRGs) dated June 2021
2) Range and mean values of background metals for North Carolina soils taken from Elements in North American Soils by Dragun and Chekiri, 2005
3) Cd and Ag concentrations were taken from Southeastern and Conterminous U.S. Soils.
4) Background metals data collected from Cotton Warehouse Brownfields property (Brownfields Project No. 24013-20-060)
5) Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Maximum Concentration of Contaminants for Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure (TCLP) regulatory level dated November 2004
Soil concentrations are reported in milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg).
Compound concentrations are reported to the laboratory method detection limits.
Laboratory analytical methods are shown in parentheses.
With the exception of metals, only constituents detected in at least one sample are shown in the table above.
ft bgs= feet below ground surface; mg/L = milligrams per liter
NA = not analyzed; NS = not specified; NE = not established; -- = not applicable
J = Compound was detected above the laboratory method detection limit, but below the laboratory reporting limit resulting in a laboratory estimated concentration.
mg/kg
Composite
0-5
4/26/2021 7/28/2020
0-2
Grab
Screening Criteria
Protection of
Groundwater
PSRG (1)
Residential
PSRGs (1)
Industrial/
Commercial
PSRGs (1)
Maximum
Concentration
for TCLP (5)
Regional Background Metals in
Soil (2)
Background Metals in Nearby
Brownfield Properties (4)4/27/2021
Proposed Area of Cut Reeves LCID Landfill
https://harthick.sharepoint.com/sites/MasterFiles-1/Shared Documents/AAA-Master Projects/White Point Partners (WPP)/WPP-014 Yandle Witherspoon/Brownfields Assessment/Report/Tables/Data Tables.xlsx
Table 1 (Page 2 of 2)
Hart & Hickman, PC
!.!.!.!.!.BKG-R-05BKG-R-01BKG-R-02BKG-R-04BKG-R-03SAMPLE LOCATION MAPREEVE'S LANDFILLBACKGROUND SOIL ASSESSMENT2323 SALOME CHURCH ROADCHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINAREVISION NO: 0FIGURE NO: 12923 South Tryon Street - Suite 100Charlotte, North Carolina 28203704-586-0007 (p) 704-586-0373 (f)License # C-1269 / # C-245 Geology0200400SCALE IN FEETDATE: 8-5-20JOB NO. ATL-003NOTES:1. AERIAL IMAGERY OBTAINED FROM MECKLENBURGCOUNTY GIS, 2019.2. PARCEL DATA OBTAINED FROM MECKLENBURGCOUNTY GIS, 2020.Path: \\HHFS01\Redirectedfolders\sperry\My Documents\ArcGIS\PROJECTS\ATL-003\Proposed_Samples.mxdNI-485 O
U
T
E
RLEGENDSITE PROPERTY BOUNDARYPARCEL BOUNDARY LINE!.SHALLOW SOIL SAMPLE LOCATIONI-485 IN
N
E
RBKG-R-03BKG-R-04BKG-R-05BKG-R-01BKG-R-02
This data package contains the analytical results for the project identified above and includes a Case Narrative, Sample
Results and Chain of Custody. Unless otherwise noted, all samples were received in acceptable condition and processed
according to the referenced methods.
Data qualifiers are flagged individually on each sample. A key reference for the data qualifiers appears at the end of this
case narrative.
NC Certification No. 402
NC Drinking Water Cert No. 37735
SC Certification No. 99012
Case Narrative
8/3/20 9:59
Hart & Hickman (Charlotte)
Andrew Besu
2923 South Tryon St. Ste 100
Charlotte, NC 28203
Project: ATL-003
Lab Submittal Date: 07/28/2020
Work Order: 0070330
Method 7199 analysis was subcontracted to Pace/Shealy. Laboratory report is attached.
Waypoint Summary of Detections does not include subcontracted data.
Narrative Notes:
Please call if you have any questions relating to this analytical report.
Respectfully,
WAYPOINT ANALYTICAL
Senior Project Manager
Angela D. Overcash
Data Qualifiers Key Reference:
A Calibration Verification results (144-148%) are high. Result might have a high bias.
J Detected but below the Reporting Limit; therefore, result is an estimated concentration (CLP J-Flag).
M Matrix spike outside of the control limits.
Method Detection LimitMDL
Not Detected at the MDLU
Relative Percent DifferenceRPD
*Results reported to the reporting limit. All other results are reported to the MDL with values between MDL and
reporting limit indicated with a J.
This report should not be reproduced, except in its entirety, without the written consent of Waypoint Analytical.
449 Springbrook Road - P.O. Box 240543 - Charlotte, NC 28224-0543
Phone: [phone] - Toll Free Number: 1-800/529-6364 - Fax: [phone]
Sample Receipt Summary
08/03/2020
Work Order: 0070330
Client Sample ID MatrixLab Sample ID Date/Time Sampled Date/Time Received
0070330-01 07/28/20 9:30BKG-R-01 (0-2)07/28/20 14:23Solid
0070330-02 07/28/20 10:00BKG-R-02 (0-2)07/28/20 14:23Solid
0070330-03 07/28/20 10:45BKG-R-03 (0-2)07/28/20 14:23Solid
0070330-04 07/28/20 11:15BKG-R-04 (0-2)07/28/20 14:23Solid
0070330-05 07/28/20 11:40BKG-R-05 (0-2)07/28/20 14:23Solid
0070330-06 07/28/20 12:50BKG-B-01 (0-2)07/28/20 14:23Solid
0070330-07 07/28/20 13:05BKG-B-02 (0-2)07/28/20 14:23Solid
0070330-08 07/28/20 13:20BKG-B-03 (0-2)07/28/20 14:23Solid
Samples were received at 13.3 degrees C. See case narrative for further information.
This report should not be reproduced, except in its entirety, without the written consent of Waypoint Analytical.
449 Springbrook Road - P.O. Box 240543 - Charlotte, NC 28224-0543
Phone: [phone] - Toll Free Number: 1-800/529-6364 - Fax: [phone]
Client ID ResultParameterMethod UnitsWaypoint ID
Work Order: 0070330
08/03/2020
Summary of Detections
0.097 A mg/kg dry0070330-01 BKG-R-01 (0-2)Mercury 7471B
3.0 mg/kg dry0070330-01 BKG-R-01 (0-2)Arsenic 6020B
120 mg/kg dry0070330-01 BKG-R-01 (0-2)Barium 6020B
0.13 J mg/kg dry0070330-01 BKG-R-01 (0-2)Cadmium 6020B
58 mg/kg dry0070330-01 BKG-R-01 (0-2)Chromium 6020B
15 mg/kg dry0070330-01 BKG-R-01 (0-2)Lead 6020B
6.4 mg/kg dry0070330-01 BKG-R-01 (0-2)Selenium 6020B
0.54 J mg/kg dry0070330-01 BKG-R-01 (0-2)Silver 6020B
0.030 A, J mg/kg dry0070330-02 BKG-R-02 (0-2)Mercury 7471B
1.9 mg/kg dry0070330-02 BKG-R-02 (0-2)Arsenic 6020B
77 J mg/kg dry0070330-02 BKG-R-02 (0-2)Barium 6020B
0.075 J mg/kg dry0070330-02 BKG-R-02 (0-2)Cadmium 6020B
36 mg/kg dry0070330-02 BKG-R-02 (0-2)Chromium 6020B
10 mg/kg dry0070330-02 BKG-R-02 (0-2)Lead 6020B
4.8 mg/kg dry0070330-02 BKG-R-02 (0-2)Selenium 6020B
0.047 A, J mg/kg dry0070330-03 BKG-R-03 (0-2)Mercury 7471B
2.6 mg/kg dry0070330-03 BKG-R-03 (0-2)Arsenic 6020B
91 J mg/kg dry0070330-03 BKG-R-03 (0-2)Barium 6020B
46 mg/kg dry0070330-03 BKG-R-03 (0-2)Chromium 6020B
12 mg/kg dry0070330-03 BKG-R-03 (0-2)Lead 6020B
6.1 mg/kg dry0070330-03 BKG-R-03 (0-2)Selenium 6020B
0.070 A mg/kg dry0070330-04 BKG-R-04 (0-2)Mercury 7471B
2.2 mg/kg dry0070330-04 BKG-R-04 (0-2)Arsenic 6020B
130 mg/kg dry0070330-04 BKG-R-04 (0-2)Barium 6020B
0.10 J mg/kg dry0070330-04 BKG-R-04 (0-2)Cadmium 6020B
47 mg/kg dry0070330-04 BKG-R-04 (0-2)Chromium 6020B
29 mg/kg dry0070330-04 BKG-R-04 (0-2)Lead 6020B
4.9 mg/kg dry0070330-04 BKG-R-04 (0-2)Selenium 6020B
0.11 J mg/kg dry0070330-04 BKG-R-04 (0-2)Silver 6020B
0.055 A, J mg/kg dry0070330-05 BKG-R-05 (0-2)Mercury 7471B
1.9 mg/kg dry0070330-05 BKG-R-05 (0-2)Arsenic 6020B
150 mg/kg dry0070330-05 BKG-R-05 (0-2)Barium 6020B
58 mg/kg dry0070330-05 BKG-R-05 (0-2)Chromium 6020B
6.7 mg/kg dry0070330-05 BKG-R-05 (0-2)Lead 6020B
5.9 mg/kg dry0070330-05 BKG-R-05 (0-2)Selenium 6020B
2.8 mg/kg dry0070330-06 BKG-B-01 (0-2)Arsenic 6020B
3.0 mg/kg dry0070330-07 BKG-B-02 (0-2)Arsenic 6020B
3.0 mg/kg dry0070330-08 BKG-B-03 (0-2)Arsenic 6020B
This report should not be reproduced, except in its entirety, without the written consent of Waypoint Analytical.
449 Springbrook Road - P.O. Box 240543 - Charlotte, NC 28224-0543
Phone: [phone] - Toll Free Number: 1-800/529-6364 - Fax: [phone]
Laboratory Report
08/03/2020
ResultParameter Batch
ID
Report
Limit
Analysis
Date/Time
MethodDilution
Factor
Units MDL Analyst
2923 South Tryon St. Ste 100
Project: ATL-003Hart & Hickman (Charlotte)
Charlotte, NC 28203
Attn: Andrew Besu
Sample Matrix: Solid
Client Sample ID:
Sample ID: 0070330-01
Work Order: 0070330
Time Collected: 07/28/20 09:30
Time Submitted: 07/28/20 14:23
BKG-R-01 (0-2)
General Chemistry Parameters
SM2540 G P0G047510.100 7/31/20 9:35 EDV% by
Weight
0.100% Solids 86.2
Total Metals
7471B P0G049910.058 7/31/20 14:09 EDVmg/kg dry 0.017Mercury0.097 A
6020B P0G0455101.2 7/30/20 19:26 JABmg/kg dry 0.097Arsenic3.0
6020B P0G0455101207/30/20 19:26 JABmg/kg dry 4.2Barium120
6020B P0G0455100.58 7/30/20 19:26 JABmg/kg dry 0.043Cadmium0.13 J
6020B P0G045510127/30/20 19:26 JABmg/kg dry 2.8Chromium58
6020B P0G0455101.2 7/30/20 19:26 JABmg/kg dry 0.088Lead15
6020B P0G0455102.9 7/30/20 19:26 JABmg/kg dry 0.27Selenium6.4
6020B P0G0455100.58 7/30/20 19:26 JABmg/kg dry 0.059Silver0.54 J
This report should not be reproduced, except in its entirety, without the written consent of Waypoint Analytical.
449 Springbrook Road - P.O. Box 240543 - Charlotte, NC 28224-0543
Phone: [phone] - Toll Free Number: 1-800/529-6364 - Fax: [phone]
Laboratory Report
08/03/2020
ResultParameter Batch
ID
Report
Limit
Analysis
Date/Time
MethodDilution
Factor
Units MDL Analyst
2923 South Tryon St. Ste 100
Project: ATL-003Hart & Hickman (Charlotte)
Charlotte, NC 28203
Attn: Andrew Besu
Sample Matrix: Solid
Client Sample ID:
Sample ID: 0070330-02
Work Order: 0070330
Time Collected: 07/28/20 10:00
Time Submitted: 07/28/20 14:23
BKG-R-02 (0-2)
General Chemistry Parameters
SM2540 G P0G047510.100 7/31/20 9:35 EDV% by
Weight
0.100% Solids 92.5
Total Metals
7471B P0G049910.054 7/31/20 14:32 EDVmg/kg dry 0.016Mercury0.030 A, J
6020B P0G0455101.1 7/30/20 19:46 JABmg/kg dry 0.091Arsenic1.9
6020B P0G0455101107/30/20 19:46 JABmg/kg dry 3.9Barium77J
6020B P0G0455100.54 7/30/20 19:46 JABmg/kg dry 0.040Cadmium0.075 J
6020B P0G045510117/30/20 19:46 JABmg/kg dry 2.6Chromium36
6020B P0G0455101.1 7/30/20 19:46 JABmg/kg dry 0.082Lead10
6020B P0G0455102.7 7/30/20 19:46 JABmg/kg dry 0.25Selenium4.8
6020B P0G0455100.54 7/30/20 19:46 JABmg/kg dry 0.055Silver0.055 U
This report should not be reproduced, except in its entirety, without the written consent of Waypoint Analytical.
449 Springbrook Road - P.O. Box 240543 - Charlotte, NC 28224-0543
Phone: [phone] - Toll Free Number: 1-800/529-6364 - Fax: [phone]
Laboratory Report
08/03/2020
ResultParameter Batch
ID
Report
Limit
Analysis
Date/Time
MethodDilution
Factor
Units MDL Analyst
2923 South Tryon St. Ste 100
Project: ATL-003Hart & Hickman (Charlotte)
Charlotte, NC 28203
Attn: Andrew Besu
Sample Matrix: Solid
Client Sample ID:
Sample ID: 0070330-03
Work Order: 0070330
Time Collected: 07/28/20 10:45
Time Submitted: 07/28/20 14:23
BKG-R-03 (0-2)
General Chemistry Parameters
SM2540 G P0G047510.100 7/31/20 9:35 EDV% by
Weight
0.100% Solids 84.1
Total Metals
7471B P0G049910.059 7/31/20 14:58 EDVmg/kg dry 0.018Mercury0.047 A, J
6020B P0G0455101.2 7/30/20 19:53 JABmg/kg dry 0.10Arsenic2.6
6020B P0G0455101207/30/20 19:53 JABmg/kg dry 4.3Barium91J
6020B P0G0455100.59 7/30/20 19:53 JABmg/kg dry 0.044Cadmium0.044 U
6020B P0G045510127/30/20 19:53 JABmg/kg dry 2.9Chromium46
6020B P0G0455101.2 7/30/20 19:53 JABmg/kg dry 0.090Lead12
6020B P0G0455103.0 7/30/20 19:53 JABmg/kg dry 0.27Selenium6.1
6020B P0G0455100.59 7/30/20 19:53 JABmg/kg dry 0.061Silver0.061 U
This report should not be reproduced, except in its entirety, without the written consent of Waypoint Analytical.
449 Springbrook Road - P.O. Box 240543 - Charlotte, NC 28224-0543
Phone: [phone] - Toll Free Number: 1-800/529-6364 - Fax: [phone]
Laboratory Report
08/03/2020
ResultParameter Batch
ID
Report
Limit
Analysis
Date/Time
MethodDilution
Factor
Units MDL Analyst
2923 South Tryon St. Ste 100
Project: ATL-003Hart & Hickman (Charlotte)
Charlotte, NC 28203
Attn: Andrew Besu
Sample Matrix: Solid
Client Sample ID:
Sample ID: 0070330-04
Work Order: 0070330
Time Collected: 07/28/20 11:15
Time Submitted: 07/28/20 14:23
BKG-R-04 (0-2)
General Chemistry Parameters
SM2540 G P0G047510.100 7/31/20 9:35 EDV% by
Weight
0.100% Solids 94.0
Total Metals
7471B P0G049910.053 7/31/20 15:02 EDVmg/kg dry 0.016Mercury0.070 A
6020B P0G0455101.1 7/30/20 20:00 JABmg/kg dry 0.089Arsenic2.2
6020B P0G0455101107/30/20 20:00 JABmg/kg dry 3.8Barium130
6020B P0G0455100.53 7/30/20 20:00 JABmg/kg dry 0.039Cadmium0.10 J
6020B P0G045510117/30/20 20:00 JABmg/kg dry 2.6Chromium47
6020B P0G0455101.1 7/30/20 20:00 JABmg/kg dry 0.081Lead29
6020B P0G0455102.7 7/30/20 20:00 JABmg/kg dry 0.24Selenium4.9
6020B P0G0455100.53 7/30/20 20:00 JABmg/kg dry 0.054Silver0.11 J
This report should not be reproduced, except in its entirety, without the written consent of Waypoint Analytical.
449 Springbrook Road - P.O. Box 240543 - Charlotte, NC 28224-0543
Phone: [phone] - Toll Free Number: 1-800/529-6364 - Fax: [phone]
Laboratory Report
08/03/2020
ResultParameter Batch
ID
Report
Limit
Analysis
Date/Time
MethodDilution
Factor
Units MDL Analyst
2923 South Tryon St. Ste 100
Project: ATL-003Hart & Hickman (Charlotte)
Charlotte, NC 28203
Attn: Andrew Besu
Sample Matrix: Solid
Client Sample ID:
Sample ID: 0070330-05
Work Order: 0070330
Time Collected: 07/28/20 11:40
Time Submitted: 07/28/20 14:23
BKG-R-05 (0-2)
General Chemistry Parameters
SM2540 G P0G047510.100 7/31/20 9:35 EDV% by
Weight
0.100% Solids 78.3
Total Metals
7471B P0G049910.064 7/31/20 15:07 EDVmg/kg dry 0.019Mercury0.055 A, J
6020B P0G0455101.3 7/30/20 20:20 JABmg/kg dry 0.11Arsenic1.9
6020B P0G0455101307/30/20 20:20 JABmg/kg dry 4.6Barium150
6020B P0G0455100.64 7/30/20 20:20 JABmg/kg dry 0.047Cadmium0.047 U
6020B P0G045510137/30/20 20:20 JABmg/kg dry 3.1Chromium58
6020B P0G0455101.3 7/30/20 20:20 JABmg/kg dry 0.097Lead6.7
6020B P0G0455103.2 7/30/20 20:20 JABmg/kg dry 0.29Selenium5.9
6020B P0G0455100.64 7/30/20 20:20 JABmg/kg dry 0.065Silver0.065 U
This report should not be reproduced, except in its entirety, without the written consent of Waypoint Analytical.
449 Springbrook Road - P.O. Box 240543 - Charlotte, NC 28224-0543
Phone: [phone] - Toll Free Number: 1-800/529-6364 - Fax: [phone]
Laboratory Report
08/03/2020
ResultParameter Batch
ID
Report
Limit
Analysis
Date/Time
MethodDilution
Factor
Units MDL Analyst
2923 South Tryon St. Ste 100
Project: ATL-003Hart & Hickman (Charlotte)
Charlotte, NC 28203
Attn: Andrew Besu
Sample Matrix: Solid
Client Sample ID:
Sample ID: 0070330-06
Work Order: 0070330
Time Collected: 07/28/20 12:50
Time Submitted: 07/28/20 14:23
BKG-B-01 (0-2)
General Chemistry Parameters
SM2540 G P0G047510.100 7/31/20 9:35 EDV% by
Weight
0.100% Solids 96.1
Total Metals
6020B P0G0455101.0 7/30/20 20:26 JABmg/kg dry 0.087Arsenic2.8
This report should not be reproduced, except in its entirety, without the written consent of Waypoint Analytical.
449 Springbrook Road - P.O. Box 240543 - Charlotte, NC 28224-0543
Phone: [phone] - Toll Free Number: 1-800/529-6364 - Fax: [phone]
Laboratory Report
08/03/2020
ResultParameter Batch
ID
Report
Limit
Analysis
Date/Time
MethodDilution
Factor
Units MDL Analyst
2923 South Tryon St. Ste 100
Project: ATL-003Hart & Hickman (Charlotte)
Charlotte, NC 28203
Attn: Andrew Besu
Sample Matrix: Solid
Client Sample ID:
Sample ID: 0070330-07
Work Order: 0070330
Time Collected: 07/28/20 13:05
Time Submitted: 07/28/20 14:23
BKG-B-02 (0-2)
General Chemistry Parameters
SM2540 G P0G047510.100 7/31/20 9:35 EDV% by
Weight
0.100% Solids 90.3
Total Metals
6020B P0G0455101.1 7/30/20 20:33 JABmg/kg dry 0.093Arsenic3.0
This report should not be reproduced, except in its entirety, without the written consent of Waypoint Analytical.
449 Springbrook Road - P.O. Box 240543 - Charlotte, NC 28224-0543
Phone: [phone] - Toll Free Number: 1-800/529-6364 - Fax: [phone]
Laboratory Report
08/03/2020
ResultParameter Batch
ID
Report
Limit
Analysis
Date/Time
MethodDilution
Factor
Units MDL Analyst
2923 South Tryon St. Ste 100
Project: ATL-003Hart & Hickman (Charlotte)
Charlotte, NC 28203
Attn: Andrew Besu
Sample Matrix: Solid
Client Sample ID:
Sample ID: 0070330-08
Work Order: 0070330
Time Collected: 07/28/20 13:20
Time Submitted: 07/28/20 14:23
BKG-B-03 (0-2)
General Chemistry Parameters
SM2540 G P0G047510.100 7/31/20 9:35 EDV% by
Weight
0.100% Solids 89.6
Total Metals
6020B P0G0455101.1 7/30/20 20:39 JABmg/kg dry 0.094Arsenic3.0
This report should not be reproduced, except in its entirety, without the written consent of Waypoint Analytical.
449 Springbrook Road - P.O. Box 240543 - Charlotte, NC 28224-0543
Phone: [phone] - Toll Free Number: 1-800/529-6364 - Fax: [phone]
8/3/20
Level II QC Report
2923 South Tryon St. Ste 100
Project: ATL-003Hart & Hickman (Charlotte)
Charlotte, NC 28203
Attn: Andrew Besu
Work Order: 0070330
Time Submitted: 7/28/2020 2:23:00PM
Result Limit
Reporting
Units Level
Spike
Result
Source
%REC
%REC
Limits RPD
RPD
Limit Notes Analyte
Total Metals - Quality Control
Batch P0G0455 - 3050B
Blank (P0G0455-BLK1)Prepared & Analyzed: 07/30/20
Arsenic mg/kg wetBRL1.0
Barium mg/kg wetBRL100
Cadmium mg/kg wetBRL0.50
Chromium mg/kg wetBRL10
Lead mg/kg wetBRL1.0
Selenium mg/kg wetBRL2.5
Silver mg/kg wetBRL0.50
LCS (P0G0455-BS1)Prepared & Analyzed: 07/30/20
Arsenic mg/kg wet12.5 1.0 12.50 80-120100
Barium mg/kg wet12.5 100 12.50 J80-120100
Cadmium mg/kg wet12.7 0.50 12.50 80-120102
Chromium mg/kg wet13.2 10 12.50 80-120106
Lead mg/kg wet13.0 1.0 12.50 80-120104
Selenium mg/kg wet12.2 2.5 12.50 80-12098
Silver mg/kg wet5.17 0.50 5.000 80-120103
Matrix Spike (P0G0455-MS1)Prepared & Analyzed: 07/30/20 Source: 0070330-01
Arsenic mg/kg dry15.4 1.2 14.50 2.95 75-12586
Barium mg/kg dry119120 14.49 119 M, J75-125NR
Cadmium mg/kg dry14.2 0.58 14.49 0.132 75-12597
Chromium mg/kg dry72.1 12 14.50 57.6 75-125100
Lead mg/kg dry29.1 1.2 14.50 14.8 75-12599
Selenium mg/kg dry19.4 2.9 14.49 6.42 75-12590
Silver mg/kg dry6.21 0.58 5.798 0.535 75-12598
Matrix Spike Dup (P0G0455-MSD1)Prepared & Analyzed: 07/30/20 Source: 0070330-01
Arsenic mg/kg dry15.5 1.2 14.50 2.95 2075-12586 0.1
Barium mg/kg dry125120 14.49 119 20 M75-12537 5
Cadmium mg/kg dry14.3 0.58 14.49 0.132 2075-12598 0.2
Chromium mg/kg dry76.8 12 14.50 57.6 20 M75-125133 6
Lead mg/kg dry30.3 1.2 14.50 14.8 2075-125107 4
Selenium mg/kg dry19.4 2.9 14.49 6.42 2075-12589 0.5
Silver mg/kg dry6.46 0.58 5.798 0.535 2075-125102 4
This report should not be reproduced, except in its entirety, without the written consent of Waypoint Analytical.
449 Springbrook Road - P.O. Box 240543 - Charlotte, NC 28224-0543
Phone: [phone] - Toll Free Number: 1-800/529-6364 - Fax: [phone]
8/3/20
Level II QC Report
2923 South Tryon St. Ste 100
Project: ATL-003Hart & Hickman (Charlotte)
Charlotte, NC 28203
Attn: Andrew Besu
Work Order: 0070330
Time Submitted: 7/28/2020 2:23:00PM
Result Limit
Reporting
Units Level
Spike
Result
Source
%REC
%REC
Limits RPD
RPD
Limit Notes Analyte
Total Metals - Quality Control
Batch P0G0455 - 3050B
Post Spike (P0G0455-PS1)Prepared & Analyzed: 07/30/20 Source: 0070330-01
Arsenic ug/L107 100.0 10.2 80-12097
Barium ug/L505 100.0 412 80-12093
Cadmium ug/L98.1 100.0 0.456 80-12098
Chromium ug/L296 100.0 199 80-12097
Lead ug/L151 100.0 50.9 80-120100
Selenium ug/L130 100.0 22.2 80-120108
Silver ug/L102 100.0 1.85 80-120101
Batch P0G0499 - 7471B
Blank (P0G0499-BLK1)Prepared & Analyzed: 07/31/20
Mercury mg/kg wetBRL0.050 A
LCS (P0G0499-BS1)Prepared & Analyzed: 07/31/20
Mercury mg/kg wet0.452 0.050 0.4167 A80-120108
Matrix Spike (P0G0499-MS1)Prepared & Analyzed: 07/31/20 Source: 0070330-01
Mercury mg/kg dry0.633 0.058 0.4831 0.0971 A80-120111
Matrix Spike Dup (P0G0499-MSD1)Prepared & Analyzed: 07/31/20 Source: 0070330-01
Mercury mg/kg dry0.769 0.058 0.4831 0.0971 20 A80-120139 19
This report should not be reproduced, except in its entirety, without the written consent of Waypoint Analytical.
449 Springbrook Road - P.O. Box 240543 - Charlotte, NC 28224-0543
Phone: [phone] - Toll Free Number: 1-800/529-6364 - Fax: [phone]
8/3/20
Level II QC Report
2923 South Tryon St. Ste 100
Project: ATL-003Hart & Hickman (Charlotte)
Charlotte, NC 28203
Attn: Andrew Besu
Work Order: 0070330
Time Submitted: 7/28/2020 2:23:00PM
Result Limit
Reporting
Units Level
Spike
Result
Source
%REC
%REC
Limits RPD
RPD
Limit Notes Analyte
General Chemistry Parameters - Quality Control
Batch P0G0475 - Solids, Dry Weight
Duplicate (P0G0475-DUP1)Prepared: 07/30/20 Analyzed: 07/31/20 Source: 0070330-06
% Solids % by Weight95.8 0.100 96.1 200.3
Sample Extraction Data
Prep Method: Solids, Dry Weight
Lab Number Batch Date/TimeInitialFinal
P0G04750070330-01 07/30/20 13:403030gg
P0G04750070330-02 07/30/20 13:403030gg
P0G04750070330-03 07/30/20 13:403030gg
P0G04750070330-04 07/30/20 13:403030gg
P0G04750070330-05 07/30/20 13:403030gg
P0G04750070330-06 07/30/20 13:403030gg
P0G04750070330-07 07/30/20 13:403030gg
P0G04750070330-08 07/30/20 13:403030gg
Prep Method: 3050B
Lab Number Batch Date/TimeInitialFinal
P0G04550070330-01 07/30/20 7:38250gmL
P0G04550070330-02 07/30/20 7:38250gmL
P0G04550070330-03 07/30/20 7:38250gmL
P0G04550070330-04 07/30/20 7:38250gmL
P0G04550070330-05 07/30/20 7:38250gmL
P0G04550070330-06 07/30/20 7:38250gmL
P0G04550070330-07 07/30/20 7:38250gmL
P0G04550070330-08 07/30/20 7:38250gmL
Prep Method: 7471B
Lab Number Batch Date/TimeInitialFinal
P0G04990070330-01 07/31/20 9:440.6 50g mL
P0G04990070330-02 07/31/20 9:440.6 50g mL
P0G04990070330-03 07/31/20 9:440.6 50g mL
P0G04990070330-04 07/31/20 9:440.6 50g mL
P0G04990070330-05 07/31/20 9:440.6 50g mL
This report should not be reproduced, except in its entirety, without the written consent of Waypoint Analytical.
449 Springbrook Road - P.O. Box 240543 - Charlotte, NC 28224-0543
Phone: [phone] - Toll Free Number: 1-800/529-6364 - Fax: [phone]
Subcontracted Analyses
Lab Number
The following analyses were subcontracted to Pace Analytical Services, LLC (Shealy)
Analysis
0070330-01 Hexavalent Chromium by 7199 (Sub)
0070330-02 Hexavalent Chromium by 7199 (Sub)
0070330-03 Hexavalent Chromium by 7199 (Sub)
0070330-04 Hexavalent Chromium by 7199 (Sub)
0070330-05 Hexavalent Chromium by 7199 (Sub)
0070330-06 Hexavalent Chromium by 7199 (Sub)
0070330-07 Hexavalent Chromium by 7199 (Sub)
0070330-08 Hexavalent Chromium by 7199 (Sub)
This report should not be reproduced, except in its entirety, without the written consent of Waypoint Analytical.
449 Springbrook Road - P.O. Box 240543 - Charlotte, NC 28224-0543
Phone: [phone] - Toll Free Number: 1-800/529-6364 - Fax: [phone]
7KH HOHFWURQLF VLJQDWXUH DERYH LV WKH HTXLYDOHQW RI D KDQGZULWWHQ VLJQDWXUH
7KLV UHSRUW VKDOO QRW EH UHSURGXFHG H[FHSW LQ LWV HQWLUHW\ZLWKRXW WKH ZULWWHQ DSSURYDO RI 3DFH $QDO\WLFDO 6HUYLFHV //&
3DFH $QDO\WLFDO 6HUYLFHV //&IRUPHUO\6KHDO\(QYLURQPHQWDO 6HUYLFHV ,QF
9DQWDJH 3RLQW ’ULYH :HVW &ROXPELD 6&
7HO )D[ZZZSDFHODEVFRP
5HSRUW RI $QDO\VLV
:D\SRLQW $QDO\WLFDO
32 %R[
&KDUORWWH 1&
$WWHQWLRQ 7HUUL &ROH
3URMHFW 1DPH
/RW 1XPEHU 9*
’DWH &RPSOHWHG
30
$SSURYHG DQG UHOHDVHG E\
3URMHFW 0DQDJHU ,,/XFDV 2GRP
Page 1 of 16
3$&($1$/<7,&$/6(59,&(6 //&
6&’+(&1R 1(/$&1R (1&’(15 1R 1&)LHOG 3DUDPHWHUV 1R
3DFH $QDO\WLFDO 6HUYLFHV //&IRUP HUO\6KHDO\(QYLURQPHWDO6HUYLFHV ,QF
9DQWDJH 3RLQW ’ULYH :HVW &ROXPELD 6&)D[ ZZZSDFHODEVFRP
&DVH 1DUUDWLYH
:D\SRLQW $QDO\WLFDO
/RW 1XPEHU 9*
7KLV 5HSRUW RI $QDO\VLV FRQWDLQV WKH DQDO\WLFDO UHVXOWV IRU WKH VDPSOH V OLVWHG RQ WKH 6DPSOH 6XPPDU\
IROORZLQJ WKLV &DVH 1DUUDWLYH 7KH VDPSOH UHFHLYLQJ GDWH LV GRFXPHQWHG LQ WKH KHDGHU LQIRUPDWLRQ
DVVRFLDWHG ZLWK HDFK VDPSOH
$OO UHVXOWV OLVWHG LQ WKLV UHSRUW UHODWH RQO\WR WKH VDPSOHV WKDW DUH FRQWDLQHG ZLWKLQ WKLV UHSRUW
6DPSOH UHFHLSW VDPSOH DQDO\VLV DQG GDWD UHYLHZ KDYH EHHQ SHUIRUPHG LQ DFFRUGDQFH ZLWK WKH PRVW
FXUUHQW DSSURYHG 1(/$&VWDQGDUGV WKH 3DFH $QDO\WLFDO 6HUYLFHV //&3D FH 4XDOLW\$VVXUDQFH
0DQDJHPHQW 3ODQ 4$03 VWDQGDUG RSHUDWLQJ SURFHGXUHV 623V DQG 3DFH SROLFLHV $Q\H[FHSWLRQV WR
WKH 1(/$&VWDQGDUGV WKH 4$03 623V RU SROLFLHV DUH TXDOLILHG RQ WKH UHVXOWV SDJH RU GLVFXVVHG EHORZ
:KHUH DSSOLFDEOH DOO VRLO VDPSOH DQDO\VLV DUH UHSRUWHG RQ D GU\ZHLJKW EDVLV XQOHVV IODJJHG ZLWK D :
TXDOLILHU
,I \RX KDYH DQ\TXHVWLRQV UHJDUGLQJ WKLV UHSRUW SOHDVH FRQWDFW WKH 3DFH 3URMHFW 0DQDJHU OLVWHG RQ WKH
FRYHU SDJH
+H[DYDOHQW &KURPLXP
7KH PVPVG IRU VDPSOH 9* UHFRYHUHG DW DQG UHVSHFWLYHO\ZLWK DQ USG RI 7KH
623 VWDWHV WKDW WKH PVPVG UHFRYHU\VKRXOG EH ZLWKLQ ZLWK DQ USG RI OHVV WKDQ 6LQFH WKH
/&6 UHFRYHUHG DW WKH LQVROXEOH VSLNH DVVRFLDWHG ZLWK 9*UHFRYHUHG DW WKH SRVW
GLJHVWLRQ VSLNH DVVRFLDWHG ZLWK 9*UHFRYHUHG DW DQG WKH USG RI WKH PVPVG LV OHVV WKDQ
LW FDQ EH GHWHUPLQHG WKDW PDWUL[LQWHUIHUHQFH LV EHLQJ GHPRQVWUDWHG
Page 2 of 16
PACE ANALYTICAL SERVICES, LLC
Sample Summary
Waypoint Analytical
Lot Number: VG29007

Sample Number Sample ID Matrix Date Sampled Date Received
001 07/28/2020 0930BKG-R-01(0-2)Solid 07/28/2020
002 07/28/2020 1000BKG-R-02(0-2)Solid 07/28/2020
003 07/28/2020 1045BKG-R-03(0-2)Solid 07/28/2020
004 07/28/2020 1115BKG-R-04(0-2)Solid 07/28/2020
005 07/28/2020 1140BKG-R-05(0-2)Solid 07/28/2020
006 07/28/2020 1250BKG-B-01(0-2)Solid 07/28/2020
007 07/28/2020 1305BKG-B-02(0-2)Solid 07/28/2020
008 07/28/2020 1320BKG-B-03(0-2)Solid 07/28/2020
(8 samples)
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.pacelabs.com
Pace Analytical Services, LLC (formerly Shealy Environmental Services, Inc.)

Page 3 of 16
PACE ANALYTICAL SERVICES, LLC
Detection Summary
Waypoint Analytical
Lot Number: VG29007

Sample Sample ID Matrix Parameter Method Result Q Units Page
001 BKG-R-01(0-2)Solid % Solids 160.3 84.0 %5
002 BKG-R-02(0-2)Solid % Solids 160.3 90.2 %6
002 BKG-R-02(0-2)Solid Hexavalent Chromium 7199 0.28 J mg/kg 6
003 BKG-R-03(0-2)Solid % Solids 160.3 84.0 %7
004 BKG-R-04(0-2)Solid % Solids 160.3 85.5 %8
004 BKG-R-04(0-2)Solid Hexavalent Chromium 7199 0.43 J mg/kg 8
005 BKG-R-05(0-2)Solid % Solids 160.3 71.3 %9
005 BKG-R-05(0-2)Solid Hexavalent Chromium 7199 0.33 J mg/kg 9
006 BKG-B-01(0-2)Solid % Solids 160.3 92.8 %10
006 BKG-B-01(0-2)Solid Hexavalent Chromium 7199 4.5 mg/kg 10
007 BKG-B-02(0-2)Solid % Solids 160.3 89.0 %11
008 BKG-B-03(0-2)Solid % Solids 160.3 79.3 %12
008 BKG-B-03(0-2)Solid Hexavalent Chromium 7199 0.38 J mg/kg 12
(13 detections)
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.pacelabs.com
Pace Analytical Services, LLC (formerly Shealy Environmental Services, Inc.)

Page 4 of 16
Description:Matrix:
Date Received:
Client:Laboratory ID:
Date Sampled:
Waypoint Analytical
BKG-R-01(0-2)
VG29007-001
07/28/2020 0930
07/28/2020
Solid
% Solids:84.0 07/30/2020 0022
Inorganic non-metals
Run Prep Method Analytical Method Dilution Analysis Date Analyst Prep Date Batch
1 (% Solids) 160.3 1 07/30/2020 0022 HET 61725
1 3060A (Hexavalent C) 7199 1 07/30/2020 1950 AMR 07/30/2020 0941 61754
AnalyticalCAS
Parameter Number Method Result Q LOQ Units Run DL
% Solids 160.3 84.0 1%
Hexavalent Chromium 18540-29-9 7199 ND 1mg/kg0.241.2
J = Estimated result < LOQ and > DL_
LOQ = Limit of Quantitation B = Detected in the method blank E = Quantitation of compound exceeded the calibration range
P = The RPD between two GC columns exceeds 40%ND = Not detected at or above the DL N = Recovery is out of criteria
H = Out of holding time
DL = Detection Limit
W = Reported on wet weight basis
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.pacelabs.com
Pace Analytical Services, LLC (formerly Shealy Environmental Services, Inc.)

Page 5 of 16
Description:Matrix:
Date Received:
Client:Laboratory ID:
Date Sampled:
Waypoint Analytical
BKG-R-02(0-2)
VG29007-002
07/28/2020 1000
07/28/2020
Solid
% Solids:90.2 07/30/2020 0022
Inorganic non-metals
Run Prep Method Analytical Method Dilution Analysis Date Analyst Prep Date Batch
1 (% Solids) 160.3 1 07/30/2020 0022 HET 61725
1 3060A (Hexavalent C) 7199 1 07/30/2020 2002 AMR 07/30/2020 0941 61754
AnalyticalCAS
Parameter Number Method Result Q LOQ Units Run DL
% Solids 160.3 90.2 1%
Hexavalent Chromium 18540-29-9 7199 0.28 J 1mg/kg0.221.1
J = Estimated result < LOQ and > DL_
LOQ = Limit of Quantitation B = Detected in the method blank E = Quantitation of compound exceeded the calibration range
P = The RPD between two GC columns exceeds 40%ND = Not detected at or above the DL N = Recovery is out of criteria
H = Out of holding time
DL = Detection Limit
W = Reported on wet weight basis
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.pacelabs.com
Pace Analytical Services, LLC (formerly Shealy Environmental Services, Inc.)

Page 6 of 16
Description:Matrix:
Date Received:
Client:Laboratory ID:
Date Sampled:
Waypoint Analytical
BKG-R-03(0-2)
VG29007-003
07/28/2020 1045
07/28/2020
Solid
% Solids:84.0 07/30/2020 0022
Inorganic non-metals
Run Prep Method Analytical Method Dilution Analysis Date Analyst Prep Date Batch
1 (% Solids) 160.3 1 07/30/2020 0022 HET 61725
1 3060A (Hexavalent C) 7199 1 07/30/2020 2015 AMR 07/30/2020 0941 61754
AnalyticalCAS
Parameter Number Method Result Q LOQ Units Run DL
% Solids 160.3 84.0 1%
Hexavalent Chromium 18540-29-9 7199 ND 1mg/kg0.241.2
J = Estimated result < LOQ and > DL_
LOQ = Limit of Quantitation B = Detected in the method blank E = Quantitation of compound exceeded the calibration range
P = The RPD between two GC columns exceeds 40%ND = Not detected at or above the DL N = Recovery is out of criteria
H = Out of holding time
DL = Detection Limit
W = Reported on wet weight basis
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.pacelabs.com
Pace Analytical Services, LLC (formerly Shealy Environmental Services, Inc.)

Page 7 of 16
Description:Matrix:
Date Received:
Client:Laboratory ID:
Date Sampled:
Waypoint Analytical
BKG-R-04(0-2)
VG29007-004
07/28/2020 1115
07/28/2020
Solid
% Solids:85.5 07/30/2020 0022
Inorganic non-metals
Run Prep Method Analytical Method Dilution Analysis Date Analyst Prep Date Batch
1 (% Solids) 160.3 1 07/30/2020 0022 HET 61725
1 3060A (Hexavalent C) 7199 1 07/30/2020 2041 AMR 07/30/2020 0941 61754
AnalyticalCAS
Parameter Number Method Result Q LOQ Units Run DL
% Solids 160.3 85.5 1%
Hexavalent Chromium 18540-29-9 7199 0.43 J 1mg/kg0.231.2
J = Estimated result < LOQ and > DL_
LOQ = Limit of Quantitation B = Detected in the method blank E = Quantitation of compound exceeded the calibration range
P = The RPD between two GC columns exceeds 40%ND = Not detected at or above the DL N = Recovery is out of criteria
H = Out of holding time
DL = Detection Limit
W = Reported on wet weight basis
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.pacelabs.com
Pace Analytical Services, LLC (formerly Shealy Environmental Services, Inc.)

Page 8 of 16
Description:Matrix:
Date Received:
Client:Laboratory ID:
Date Sampled:
Waypoint Analytical
BKG-R-05(0-2)
VG29007-005
07/28/2020 1140
07/28/2020
Solid
% Solids:71.3 07/30/2020 0022
Inorganic non-metals
Run Prep Method Analytical Method Dilution Analysis Date Analyst Prep Date Batch
1 (% Solids) 160.3 1 07/30/2020 0022 HET 61725
1 3060A (Hexavalent C) 7199 1 07/30/2020 2054 AMR 07/30/2020 0941 61754
AnalyticalCAS
Parameter Number Method Result Q LOQ Units Run DL
% Solids 160.3 71.3 1%
Hexavalent Chromium 18540-29-9 7199 0.33 J 1mg/kg0.281.4
J = Estimated result < LOQ and > DL_
LOQ = Limit of Quantitation B = Detected in the method blank E = Quantitation of compound exceeded the calibration range
P = The RPD between two GC columns exceeds 40%ND = Not detected at or above the DL N = Recovery is out of criteria
H = Out of holding time
DL = Detection Limit
W = Reported on wet weight basis
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.pacelabs.com
Pace Analytical Services, LLC (formerly Shealy Environmental Services, Inc.)

Page 9 of 16
Description:Matrix:
Date Received:
Client:Laboratory ID:
Date Sampled:
Waypoint Analytical
BKG-B-01(0-2)
VG29007-006
07/28/2020 1250
07/28/2020
Solid
% Solids:92.8 07/30/2020 0022
Inorganic non-metals
Run Prep Method Analytical Method Dilution Analysis Date Analyst Prep Date Batch
1 (% Solids) 160.3 1 07/30/2020 0022 HET 61725
1 3060A (Hexavalent C) 7199 1 07/30/2020 2120 AMR 07/30/2020 0941 61754
AnalyticalCAS
Parameter Number Method Result Q LOQ Units Run DL
% Solids 160.3 92.8 1%
Hexavalent Chromium 18540-29-9 7199 4.5 1mg/kg0.221.1
J = Estimated result < LOQ and > DL_
LOQ = Limit of Quantitation B = Detected in the method blank E = Quantitation of compound exceeded the calibration range
P = The RPD between two GC columns exceeds 40%ND = Not detected at or above the DL N = Recovery is out of criteria
H = Out of holding time
DL = Detection Limit
W = Reported on wet weight basis
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.pacelabs.com
Pace Analytical Services, LLC (formerly Shealy Environmental Services, Inc.)

Page 10 of 16
Description:Matrix:
Date Received:
Client:Laboratory ID:
Date Sampled:
Waypoint Analytical
BKG-B-02(0-2)
VG29007-007
07/28/2020 1305
07/28/2020
Solid
% Solids:89.0 07/30/2020 0022
Inorganic non-metals
Run Prep Method Analytical Method Dilution Analysis Date Analyst Prep Date Batch
1 (% Solids) 160.3 1 07/30/2020 0022 HET 61725
1 3060A (Hexavalent C) 7199 1 07/30/2020 2225 AMR 07/30/2020 0941 61754
AnalyticalCAS
Parameter Number Method Result Q LOQ Units Run DL
% Solids 160.3 89.0 1%
Hexavalent Chromium 18540-29-9 7199 ND 1mg/kg0.221.1
J = Estimated result < LOQ and > DL_
LOQ = Limit of Quantitation B = Detected in the method blank E = Quantitation of compound exceeded the calibration range
P = The RPD between two GC columns exceeds 40%ND = Not detected at or above the DL N = Recovery is out of criteria
H = Out of holding time
DL = Detection Limit
W = Reported on wet weight basis
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.pacelabs.com
Pace Analytical Services, LLC (formerly Shealy Environmental Services, Inc.)

Page 11 of 16
Description:Matrix:
Date Received:
Client:Laboratory ID:
Date Sampled:
Waypoint Analytical
BKG-B-03(0-2)
VG29007-008
07/28/2020 1320
07/28/2020
Solid
% Solids:79.3 07/30/2020 0022
Inorganic non-metals
Run Prep Method Analytical Method Dilution Analysis Date Analyst Prep Date Batch
1 (% Solids) 160.3 1 07/30/2020 0022 HET 61725
1 3060A (Hexavalent C) 7199 1 07/30/2020 2238 AMR 07/30/2020 0941 61754
AnalyticalCAS
Parameter Number Method Result Q LOQ Units Run DL
% Solids 160.3 79.3 1%
Hexavalent Chromium 18540-29-9 7199 0.38 J 1mg/kg0.251.3
J = Estimated result < LOQ and > DL_
LOQ = Limit of Quantitation B = Detected in the method blank E = Quantitation of compound exceeded the calibration range
P = The RPD between two GC columns exceeds 40%ND = Not detected at or above the DL N = Recovery is out of criteria
H = Out of holding time
DL = Detection Limit
W = Reported on wet weight basis
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.pacelabs.com
Pace Analytical Services, LLC (formerly Shealy Environmental Services, Inc.)

Page 12 of 16
Chain of Custody
and
Miscellaneous Documents
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.pacelabs.com
Pace Analytical Services, LLC (formerly Shealy Environmental Services, Inc.)

Page 13 of 16
PACE ANALYTICAL SERVICES, LLC

106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.pacelabs.com
Pace Analytical Services, LLC (formerly Shealy Environmental Services, Inc.)

Page 14 of 16
PACE ANALYTICAL SERVICES, LLC

106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.pacelabs.com
Pace Analytical Services, LLC (formerly Shealy Environmental Services, Inc.)

Page 15 of 16
PACE ANALYTICAL SERVICES, LLC

106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.pacelabs.com
Pace Analytical Services, LLC (formerly Shealy Environmental Services, Inc.)

Page 16 of 16
!.!.
!.
!.!.
BACKGROUND SOIL SAMPLE LOCATION MAP
OLD 27 LCID LANDFILLBACKGROUND SOIL ASSESSMENT
114 TATE STREETMOUNT HOLLY, NORTH CAROLINA
REVISION NO: 0
FIGURE NO: 1
2923 South Tryon Street - Suite 100Charlotte, North Carolina 28203704-586-0007 (p) 704-586-0373 (f)License # C-1269 / # C-245 Geology
0 200 400
SCALE IN FEET
DATE: 4-29-21
JOB NO. ATL-004
NOTES:
1. AERIAL IMAGERY OBTAINED FROM NC ONEMAP, 2019.
2. PARCEL DATA OBTAINED FROM GASTON COUNTYGIS, 2020.Path: M:\AAA-Master Projects\ATCO LLC - ATC\ATL-003 CIP\Figures\Proposed_Samples_Old_27_Landfill_4.29.21.mxdN
TATE STREET
GARDNER R
O
A
D
LEGEND
SITE PROPERTY BOUNDARY
PARCEL BOUNDARY LINE
!.SHALLOW SOIL SAMPLE LOCATION
BG-OL27-5 BG-OL27-4
BG-OL27-3
BG-OL27-2BG-OL27-1
This data package contains the analytical results for the project identified above and includes a Case Narrative, Sample
Results and Chain of Custody. Unless otherwise noted, all samples were received in acceptable condition and processed
according to the referenced methods.
Data qualifiers are flagged individually on each sample. A key reference for the data qualifiers appears at the end of this case
narrative.
NC Certification No. 402
NC Drinking Water Cert No. 37735
SC Certification No. 99012
Case Narrative
1/4/21 12:28
Hart & Hickman (Charlotte)
Andrew Besu
2923 South Tryon St. Ste 100
Charlotte, NC 28203
Project: ATL-003
Lab Submittal Date: 12/17/2020
Work Order: 0120292
Method 7199 analysis was subcontracted to Pace/Shealy. Laboratory report is attached.
Waypoint Summary of Detections does not include subcontracted data .
Narrative Notes:
Please call if you have any questions relating to this analytical report.
Respectfully,
WAYPOINT ANALYTICAL
Senior Project Manager
Angela D. Overcash
Data Qualifiers Key Reference:
J Detected but below the Reporting Limit; therefore, result is an estimated concentration (CLP J-Flag).
Method Detection LimitMDL
Below Reporting LimitBRL
Relative Percent DifferenceRPD
*Results reported to the reporting limit. All other results are reported to the MDL with values between MDL and
reporting limit indicated with a J.
This report should not be reproduced, except in its entirety, without the written consent of Waypoint Analytical.
449 Springbrook Road - P.O. Box 240543 - Charlotte, NC 28224-0543
Phone: [phone] - Toll Free Number: 1-800/529-6364 - Fax: [phone] Page 1 of 26
Sample Receipt Summary
01/04/2021
Work Order: 0120292
Client Sample ID MatrixLab Sample ID Date/Time Sampled Date/Time Received
0120292-01 12/17/20 14:00BG-0L27-1 12/17/20 15:09Solid
0120292-02 12/17/20 14:05BG-0L27-2 12/17/20 15:09Solid
0120292-03 12/17/20 14:10BG-0L27-3 12/17/20 15:09Solid
0120292-04 12/17/20 14:15BG-0L27-4 12/17/20 15:09Solid
0120292-05 12/17/20 14:20BG-0L27-5 12/17/20 15:09Solid
Samples were received in good condition at 1.8 degrees C unless otherwise noted.
This report should not be reproduced, except in its entirety, without the written consent of Waypoint Analytical.
449 Springbrook Road - P.O. Box 240543 - Charlotte, NC 28224-0543
Phone: [phone] - Toll Free Number: 1-800/529-6364 - Fax: [phone] Page 2 of 26
Client ID ResultParameterMethod UnitsWaypoint ID
Work Order: 0120292
01/04/2021
Summary of Detections
0.044 J mg/kg dry0120292-01 BG-0L27-1 Mercury 7471B
1.6 mg/kg dry0120292-01 BG-0L27-1 Arsenic 6020B
64 mg/kg dry0120292-01 BG-0L27-1 Barium 6020B
37 mg/kg dry0120292-01 BG-0L27-1 Chromium 6020B
11 mg/kg dry0120292-01 BG-0L27-1 Lead 6020B
1.2 J mg/kg dry0120292-01 BG-0L27-1 Selenium 6020B
0.041 J mg/kg dry0120292-02 BG-0L27-2 Mercury 7471B
2.7 mg/kg dry0120292-02 BG-0L27-2 Arsenic 6020B
160 mg/kg dry0120292-02 BG-0L27-2 Barium 6020B
39 mg/kg dry0120292-02 BG-0L27-2 Chromium 6020B
18 mg/kg dry0120292-02 BG-0L27-2 Lead 6020B
4.1 mg/kg dry0120292-02 BG-0L27-2 Selenium 6020B
0.032 J mg/kg dry0120292-03 BG-0L27-3 Mercury 7471B
1.2 mg/kg dry0120292-03 BG-0L27-3 Arsenic 6020B
220 mg/kg dry0120292-03 BG-0L27-3 Barium 6020B
45 mg/kg dry0120292-03 BG-0L27-3 Chromium 6020B
6.6 mg/kg dry0120292-03 BG-0L27-3 Lead 6020B
3.4 mg/kg dry0120292-03 BG-0L27-3 Selenium 6020B
0.074 mg/kg dry0120292-04 BG-0L27-4 Mercury 7471B
2.2 mg/kg dry0120292-04 BG-0L27-4 Arsenic 6020B
90 mg/kg dry0120292-04 BG-0L27-4 Barium 6020B
90 mg/kg dry0120292-04 BG-0L27-4 Chromium 6020B
12 mg/kg dry0120292-04 BG-0L27-4 Lead 6020B
1.4 mg/kg dry0120292-04 BG-0L27-4 Selenium 6020B
0.037 J mg/kg dry0120292-05 BG-0L27-5 Mercury 7471B
1.7 mg/kg dry0120292-05 BG-0L27-5 Arsenic 6020B
96 mg/kg dry0120292-05 BG-0L27-5 Barium 6020B
51 mg/kg dry0120292-05 BG-0L27-5 Chromium 6020B
12 mg/kg dry0120292-05 BG-0L27-5 Lead 6020B
2.1 mg/kg dry0120292-05 BG-0L27-5 Selenium 6020B
This report should not be reproduced, except in its entirety, without the written consent of Waypoint Analytical.
449 Springbrook Road - P.O. Box 240543 - Charlotte, NC 28224-0543
Phone: [phone] - Toll Free Number: 1-800/529-6364 - Fax: [phone] Page 3 of 26
Laboratory Report
01/04/2021
ResultParameter Batch
ID
Report
Limit
Analysis
Date/Time
MethodDilution
Factor
Units MDL Analyst
2923 South Tryon St. Ste 100
Project: ATL-003Hart & Hickman (Charlotte)
Charlotte, NC 28203
Attn: Andrew Besu
Sample Matrix: Solid
Client Sample ID: BG-0L27-1
Sample ID: 0120292-01
Work Order: 0120292
Time Collected: 12/17/20 14:00
Time Submitted: 12/17/20 15:09
General Chemistry Parameters
SM2540 G P0L044610.100 12/22/20 8:10 SMW% by
Weight
0.100% Solids 76.6
Total Metals
7471B P0L040410.065 12/18/20 15:12 EDVJmg/kg dry 0.020Mercury0.044
6020B P0L0401101.3 12/18/20 23:19 JABmg/kg dry 0.11Arsenic1.6
6020B P0L0401101312/18/20 23:19 JABmg/kg dry 0.47Barium64
6020B P0L0401100.65 12/18/20 23:19 JABmg/kg dry 0.048CadmiumBDL
6020B P0L0401101.3 12/18/20 23:19 JABmg/kg dry 0.31Chromium37
6020B P0L0401101.3 12/18/20 23:19 JABmg/kg dry 0.099Lead11
6020B P0L0401101.3 12/18/20 23:19 JABJmg/kg dry 0.30Selenium1.2
6020B P0L0401100.65 12/18/20 23:19 JABmg/kg dry 0.067SilverBDL
This report should not be reproduced, except in its entirety, without the written consent of Waypoint Analytical.
449 Springbrook Road - P.O. Box 240543 - Charlotte, NC 28224-0543
Phone: [phone] - Toll Free Number: 1-800/529-6364 - Fax: [phone] Page 4 of 26
Laboratory Report
01/04/2021
ResultParameter Batch
ID
Report
Limit
Analysis
Date/Time
MethodDilution
Factor
Units MDL Analyst
2923 South Tryon St. Ste 100
Project: ATL-003Hart & Hickman (Charlotte)
Charlotte, NC 28203
Attn: Andrew Besu
Sample Matrix: Solid
Client Sample ID: BG-0L27-2
Sample ID: 0120292-02
Work Order: 0120292
Time Collected: 12/17/20 14:05
Time Submitted: 12/17/20 15:09
General Chemistry Parameters
SM2540 G P0L044610.100 12/22/20 8:10 SMW% by
Weight
0.100% Solids 73.5
Total Metals
7471B P0L040410.068 12/18/20 15:17 EDVJmg/kg dry 0.020Mercury0.041
6020B P0L0401101.4 12/18/20 23:25 JABmg/kg dry 0.11Arsenic2.7
6020B P0L0401101412/18/20 23:25 JABmg/kg dry 0.49Barium160
6020B P0L0401100.68 12/18/20 23:25 JABmg/kg dry 0.050CadmiumBDL
6020B P0L0401101.4 12/18/20 23:25 JABmg/kg dry 0.33Chromium39
6020B P0L0401101.4 12/18/20 23:25 JABmg/kg dry 0.10Lead18
6020B P0L0401101.4 12/18/20 23:25 JABmg/kg dry 0.31Selenium4.1
6020B P0L0401100.68 12/18/20 23:25 JABmg/kg dry 0.069SilverBDL
This report should not be reproduced, except in its entirety, without the written consent of Waypoint Analytical.
449 Springbrook Road - P.O. Box 240543 - Charlotte, NC 28224-0543
Phone: [phone] - Toll Free Number: 1-800/529-6364 - Fax: [phone] Page 5 of 26
Laboratory Report
01/04/2021
ResultParameter Batch
ID
Report
Limit
Analysis
Date/Time
MethodDilution
Factor
Units MDL Analyst
2923 South Tryon St. Ste 100
Project: ATL-003Hart & Hickman (Charlotte)
Charlotte, NC 28203
Attn: Andrew Besu
Sample Matrix: Solid
Client Sample ID: BG-0L27-3
Sample ID: 0120292-03
Work Order: 0120292
Time Collected: 12/17/20 14:10
Time Submitted: 12/17/20 15:09
General Chemistry Parameters
SM2540 G P0L044610.100 12/22/20 8:10 SMW% by
Weight
0.100% Solids 81.8
Total Metals
7471B P0L040410.061 12/18/20 15:21 EDVJmg/kg dry 0.018Mercury0.032
6020B P0L0401101.2 12/18/20 23:32 JABmg/kg dry 0.10Arsenic1.2
6020B P0L0401101212/18/20 23:32 JABmg/kg dry 0.44Barium220
6020B P0L0401100.61 12/18/20 23:32 JABmg/kg dry 0.045CadmiumBDL
6020B P0L0401101.2 12/18/20 23:32 JABmg/kg dry 0.29Chromium45
6020B P0L0401101.2 12/18/20 23:32 JABmg/kg dry 0.093Lead6.6
6020B P0L0401101.2 12/18/20 23:32 JABmg/kg dry 0.28Selenium3.4
6020B P0L0401100.61 12/18/20 23:32 JABmg/kg dry 0.062SilverBDL
This report should not be reproduced, except in its entirety, without the written consent of Waypoint Analytical.
449 Springbrook Road - P.O. Box 240543 - Charlotte, NC 28224-0543
Phone: [phone] - Toll Free Number: 1-800/529-6364 - Fax: [phone] Page 6 of 26
Laboratory Report
01/04/2021
ResultParameter Batch
ID
Report
Limit
Analysis
Date/Time
MethodDilution
Factor
Units MDL Analyst
2923 South Tryon St. Ste 100
Project: ATL-003Hart & Hickman (Charlotte)
Charlotte, NC 28203
Attn: Andrew Besu
Sample Matrix: Solid
Client Sample ID: BG-0L27-4
Sample ID: 0120292-04
Work Order: 0120292
Time Collected: 12/17/20 14:15
Time Submitted: 12/17/20 15:09
General Chemistry Parameters
SM2540 G P0L044610.100 12/22/20 8:10 SMW% by
Weight
0.100% Solids 72.3
Total Metals
7471B P0L040410.069 12/18/20 15:26 EDVmg/kg dry 0.021Mercury0.074
6020B P0L0401101.4 12/18/20 23:38 JABmg/kg dry 0.12Arsenic2.2
6020B P0L0401101412/18/20 23:38 JABmg/kg dry 0.50Barium90
6020B P0L0401100.69 12/18/20 23:38 JABmg/kg dry 0.051CadmiumBDL
6020B P0L0401101.4 12/18/20 23:38 JABmg/kg dry 0.33Chromium90
6020B P0L0401101.4 12/18/20 23:38 JABmg/kg dry 0.11Lead12
6020B P0L0401101.4 12/18/20 23:38 JABmg/kg dry 0.32Selenium1.4
6020B P0L0401100.69 12/18/20 23:38 JABmg/kg dry 0.071SilverBDL
This report should not be reproduced, except in its entirety, without the written consent of Waypoint Analytical.
449 Springbrook Road - P.O. Box 240543 - Charlotte, NC 28224-0543
Phone: [phone] - Toll Free Number: 1-800/529-6364 - Fax: [phone] Page 7 of 26
Laboratory Report
01/04/2021
ResultParameter Batch
ID
Report
Limit
Analysis
Date/Time
MethodDilution
Factor
Units MDL Analyst
2923 South Tryon St. Ste 100
Project: ATL-003Hart & Hickman (Charlotte)
Charlotte, NC 28203
Attn: Andrew Besu
Sample Matrix: Solid
Client Sample ID: BG-0L27-5
Sample ID: 0120292-05
Work Order: 0120292
Time Collected: 12/17/20 14:20
Time Submitted: 12/17/20 15:09
General Chemistry Parameters
SM2540 G P0L044610.100 12/22/20 8:10 SMW% by
Weight
0.100% Solids 79.7
Total Metals
7471B P0L040410.063 12/18/20 15:30 EDVJmg/kg dry 0.019Mercury0.037
6020B P0L0401101.3 12/18/20 23:45 JABmg/kg dry 0.11Arsenic1.7
6020B P0L0401101312/18/20 23:45 JABmg/kg dry 0.45Barium96
6020B P0L0401100.63 12/18/20 23:45 JABmg/kg dry 0.046CadmiumBDL
6020B P0L0401101.3 12/18/20 23:45 JABmg/kg dry 0.30Chromium51
6020B P0L0401101.3 12/18/20 23:45 JABmg/kg dry 0.095Lead12
6020B P0L0401101.3 12/18/20 23:45 JABmg/kg dry 0.29Selenium2.1
6020B P0L0401100.63 12/18/20 23:45 JABmg/kg dry 0.064SilverBDL
This report should not be reproduced, except in its entirety, without the written consent of Waypoint Analytical.
449 Springbrook Road - P.O. Box 240543 - Charlotte, NC 28224-0543
Phone: [phone] - Toll Free Number: 1-800/529-6364 - Fax: [phone] Page 8 of 26
1/4/21
Level II QC Report
2923 South Tryon St. Ste 100
Project: ATL-003Hart & Hickman (Charlotte)
Charlotte, NC 28203
Attn: Andrew Besu
Work Order: 0120292
Time Submitted: 12/17/2020 3:09:00PM
Result Limit
Reporting
Units Level
Spike
Result
Source
%REC
%REC
Limits RPD
RPD
Limit Notes Analyte
Total Metals - Quality Control
Batch P0L0401 - 3050B
Blank (P0L0401-BLK1)Prepared & Analyzed: 12/18/20
Arsenic mg/kg wetBRL1.0
Barium mg/kg wetBRL10
Cadmium mg/kg wetBRL0.50
Chromium mg/kg wetBRL1.0
Lead mg/kg wetBRL1.0
Selenium mg/kg wetBRL1.0
Silver mg/kg wetBRL0.50
LCS (P0L0401-BS1)Prepared & Analyzed: 12/18/20
Arsenic mg/kg wet12.4 1.0 12.50 80-120100
Barium mg/kg wet12.5 10 12.50 80-120100
Cadmium mg/kg wet12.4 0.50 12.50 80-120100
Chromium mg/kg wet12.5 1.0 12.50 80-120100
Lead mg/kg wet13.0 1.0 12.50 80-120104
Selenium mg/kg wet12.3 1.0 12.50 80-12098
Silver mg/kg wet5.04 0.50 5.000 80-120101
Batch P0L0404 - 7471B
Blank (P0L0404-BLK1)Prepared & Analyzed: 12/18/20
Mercury mg/kg wetBRL0.050
LCS (P0L0404-BS1)Prepared & Analyzed: 12/18/20
Mercury mg/kg wet0.413 0.050 0.4167 80-12099
This report should not be reproduced, except in its entirety, without the written consent of Waypoint Analytical.
449 Springbrook Road - P.O. Box 240543 - Charlotte, NC 28224-0543
Phone: [phone] - Toll Free Number: 1-800/529-6364 - Fax: [phone] Page 9 of 26
1/4/21
Level II QC Report
2923 South Tryon St. Ste 100
Project: ATL-003Hart & Hickman (Charlotte)
Charlotte, NC 28203
Attn: Andrew Besu
Work Order: 0120292
Time Submitted: 12/17/2020 3:09:00PM
Result Limit
Reporting
Units Level
Spike
Result
Source
%REC
%REC
Limits RPD
RPD
Limit Notes Analyte
General Chemistry Parameters - Quality Control
Batch P0L0446 - Solids, Dry Weight
Duplicate (P0L0446-DUP1)Prepared & Analyzed: 12/22/20 Source: 0120292-05
% Solids % by Weight79.7 0.100 79.7 200.01
Sample Extraction Data
Prep Method: Solids, Dry Weight
Lab Number Batch Date/TimeInitialFinal
P0L04460120292-01 12/22/20 8:103030gg
P0L04460120292-02 12/22/20 8:103030gg
P0L04460120292-03 12/22/20 8:103030gg
P0L04460120292-04 12/22/20 8:103030gg
P0L04460120292-05 12/22/20 8:103030gg
Prep Method: 3050B
Lab Number Batch Date/TimeInitialFinal
P0L04010120292-01 12/18/20 9:41250gmL
P0L04010120292-02 12/18/20 9:41250gmL
P0L04010120292-03 12/18/20 9:41250gmL
P0L04010120292-04 12/18/20 9:41250gmL
P0L04010120292-05 12/18/20 9:41250gmL
Prep Method: 7471B
Lab Number Batch Date/TimeInitialFinal
P0L04040120292-01 12/18/20 12:000.6 50g mL
P0L04040120292-02 12/18/20 12:000.6 50g mL
P0L04040120292-03 12/18/20 12:000.6 50g mL
P0L04040120292-04 12/18/20 12:000.6 50g mL
P0L04040120292-05 12/18/20 12:000.6 50g mL
Subcontracted Analyses
Lab Number
The following analyses were subcontracted to Pace Analytical Services, LLC (Shealy)
Analysis
0120292-01 Hexavalent Chromium by 7199 (Sub)
0120292-02 Hexavalent Chromium by 7199 (Sub)
0120292-03 Hexavalent Chromium by 7199 (Sub)
0120292-04 Hexavalent Chromium by 7199 (Sub)
0120292-05 Hexavalent Chromium by 7199 (Sub)
This report should not be reproduced, except in its entirety, without the written consent of Waypoint Analytical.
449 Springbrook Road - P.O. Box 240543 - Charlotte, NC 28224-0543
Phone: [phone] - Toll Free Number: 1-800/529-6364 - Fax: [phone] Page 10 of 26
Page 11 of 26
7KH HOHFWURQLF VLJQDWXUH DERYH LV WKH HTXLYDOHQW RI D KDQGZULWWHQ VLJQDWXUH
7KLV UHSRUW VKDOO QRW EH UHSURGXFHG H[FHSW LQ LWV HQWLUHW\ZLWKRXW WKH ZULWWHQ DSSURYDO RI 3DFH $QDO\WLFDO 6HUYLFHV //&
3DFH $QDO\WLFDO 6HUYLFHV //&IRUP HUO\6KHDO\(QYLURQPHQWDO 6HUYLFHV ,QF
9DQWDJH 3RLQW ’ULYH :HVW &ROXPELD 6&
7HO )D [ZZZ SDFHODEV FRP
5HSRUW RI $QDO\VLV
:D\SRLQW $QDO\WLFDO
32 %R[
&KDUORWWH 1&
$WWHQWLRQ $QJHOD 2YH UFDVK
3URMHFW 1DPH
/RW 1XPEHU 9/
’DWH &RPSOHWHG
$0
$SSURYHG DQG UHOHDVHG E\
3URMHFW 0DQDJHU ,,/XFDV 2GRP
Page 1 of 15 Page 12 of 26
3$&( $1$/<7,&$/ 6(59,&(6 //&
6& ’+(&1R 1(/$& 1R(1& ’(15 1R 1& )LHOG 3DUDPHWHUV 1R
3DFH $QDO\WLFDO 6HUYLFHV //&IRUPHUO\6KHDO\(QYLURQPHWDO 6HUYLFHV,QF
9DQWDJH 3RLQW ’ULYH :HVW &ROXPELD 6& )D [ZZZ SDFHODEV FRP
&DVH 1DUUDWLYH
:D\SRLQW $QDO\WLFDO
/RW 1XPEHU 9/
7KLV 5HSRUW RI $QDO\VLV FRQWDLQV WKH DQDO\WLFDO UHVXOW V IRU WKH VDPSOH V OLVWHG RQ WKH 6DPSOH 6XPPDU\
IROORZLQJ WKLV &DVH 1DUUDWLYH7KH VDPSOH UHFHLYLQJ GDWH LV GRFXPHQWHG LQ WKH KHDGHU LQIRUPDWLRQ
DVVRFLDWHG ZLWK HDFK VDPSOH
$OO UHVXOWV OLVWHG LQ WKLV UHSRUW UHODWH RQO\WR WKH VDPSOHV WKDW DUH FRQWDLQHG ZLWKLQ WKLV UHSRUW
6DPSOH UHFHLSW VDPSOH DQDO\VLV DQG GDWD UHYLHZ KDYH EHHQ SHUIRUPHG LQ DFFRUGDQFH ZLWK WKH PRVW
FXUUHQW DSSURYHG 7KH 1(/$& ,QVWLWXWH 71,VWDQGDUGV WKH 3DFH $QDO\WLFDO 6HUYLFHV //&3 DFH
/DERUDWRU\4XDOLW\0DQXDO VWDQGDUG RSHUDWLQJ SURFHGXUHV 623V DQG 3DFH SROLFLHV $Q\H[FHSWLRQV WR
WKH 71,VWDQGDUGV WKH /DERUDWRU\4XDOLW\0DQXDO 623V RU SROLFLHV DUH TXDOLILHG RQ WKH UHVXOWV SDJH RU
GLVFXVVHG EHORZ
:KHUH DSSOLFDEOH DOO VRLO VDPSOH DQDO\VLV DUH UHSRUWHG RQ D GU\ZHLJKW EDVLV XQOHVV IODJJHG ZLWK D :
TXDOLILHU
,I \RX KDYH DQ\TXHVWLRQV UHJDUGLQJ WKLV UHSRUW SOHDVH FRQWDFW WKH 3DFH 3URMHFW 0DQDJHU OLVWHG RQ WKH
FRYHU SDJH
Page 2 of 15 Page 13 of 26
PACE ANALYTICAL SERVICES, LLC
Sample Summary
Waypoint Analytical
Lot Number: VL21023

Sample Number Sample ID Matrix Date Sampled Date Received
001 12/17/2020 1400BG-0127-1 Solid 12/21/2020
002 12/17/2020 1405BG-0127-2 Solid 12/21/2020
003 12/17/2020 1410BG-0127-3 Solid 12/21/2020
004 12/17/2020 1415BG-0127-4 Solid 12/21/2020
005 12/17/2020 1420BG-0127-5 Solid 12/21/2020
(5 samples)
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.pacelabs.com
Pace Analytical Services, LLC (formerly Shealy Environmental Services, Inc.)

Page 3 of 15 Page 14 of 26
PACE ANALYTICAL SERVICES, LLC
Detection Summary
Waypoint Analytical
Lot Number: VL21023

Sample Sample ID Matrix Parameter Method Result Q Units Page
001 BG-0127-1 Solid Hexavalent Chromium 7199 0.34 J mg/kg 5
003 BG-0127-3 Solid Hexavalent Chromium 7199 0.44 J mg/kg 7
004 BG-0127-4 Solid Hexavalent Chromium 7199 2.0 mg/kg 8
005 BG-0127-5 Solid Hexavalent Chromium 7199 0.62 J mg/kg 9
(4 detections)
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.pacelabs.com
Pace Analytical Services, LLC (formerly Shealy Environmental Services, Inc.)

Page 4 of 15 Page 15 of 26
Description:Matrix:
Date Received:
Client:Laboratory ID:
Date Sampled:
Waypoint Analytical
BG-0127-1
VL21023-001
12/17/2020 1400
12/21/2020
Solid
% Solids:80.9 12/21/2020 2259
Inorganic non-metals
Run Prep Method Analytical Method Dilution Analysis Date Analyst Prep Date Batch
1 3060A (Hexavalent C) 7199 1 12/30/2020 1449 AMR 12/29/2020 1733 77940
AnalyticalCAS
Parameter Number Method Result Q LOQ Units Run DL
Hexavalent Chromium 18540-29-9 7199 0.34 J 1mg/kg0.251.2
J = Estimated result < LOQ and > DL_
LOQ = Limit of Quantitation B = Detected in the method blank E = Quantitation of compound exceeded the calibration range
P = The RPD between two GC columns exceeds 40%ND = Not detected at or above the DL N = Recovery is out of criteria
H = Out of holding time
DL = Detection Limit
W = Reported on wet weight basis
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.pacelabs.com
Pace Analytical Services, LLC (formerly Shealy Environmental Services, Inc.)

Page 5 of 15 Page 16 of 26
Description:Matrix:
Date Received:
Client:Laboratory ID:
Date Sampled:
Waypoint Analytical
BG-0127-2
VL21023-002
12/17/2020 1405
12/21/2020
Solid
% Solids:73.5 12/21/2020 2259
Inorganic non-metals
Run Prep Method Analytical Method Dilution Analysis Date Analyst Prep Date Batch
1 3060A (Hexavalent C) 7199 1 12/30/2020 1502 AMR 12/29/2020 1733 77940
AnalyticalCAS
Parameter Number Method Result Q LOQ Units Run DL
Hexavalent Chromium 18540-29-9 7199 ND 1mg/kg0.271.4
J = Estimated result < LOQ and > DL_
LOQ = Limit of Quantitation B = Detected in the method blank E = Quantitation of compound exceeded the calibration range
P = The RPD between two GC columns exceeds 40%ND = Not detected at or above the DL N = Recovery is out of criteria
H = Out of holding time
DL = Detection Limit
W = Reported on wet weight basis
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.pacelabs.com
Pace Analytical Services, LLC (formerly Shealy Environmental Services, Inc.)

Page 6 of 15 Page 17 of 26
Description:Matrix:
Date Received:
Client:Laboratory ID:
Date Sampled:
Waypoint Analytical
BG-0127-3
VL21023-003
12/17/2020 1410
12/21/2020
Solid
% Solids:82.5 12/21/2020 2259
Inorganic non-metals
Run Prep Method Analytical Method Dilution Analysis Date Analyst Prep Date Batch
1 3060A (Hexavalent C) 7199 1 12/30/2020 1515 AMR 12/29/2020 1733 77940
AnalyticalCAS
Parameter Number Method Result Q LOQ Units Run DL
Hexavalent Chromium 18540-29-9 7199 0.44 J 1mg/kg0.241.2
J = Estimated result < LOQ and > DL_
LOQ = Limit of Quantitation B = Detected in the method blank E = Quantitation of compound exceeded the calibration range
P = The RPD between two GC columns exceeds 40%ND = Not detected at or above the DL N = Recovery is out of criteria
H = Out of holding time
DL = Detection Limit
W = Reported on wet weight basis
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.pacelabs.com
Pace Analytical Services, LLC (formerly Shealy Environmental Services, Inc.)

Page 7 of 15 Page 18 of 26
Description:Matrix:
Date Received:
Client:Laboratory ID:
Date Sampled:
Waypoint Analytical
BG-0127-4
VL21023-004
12/17/2020 1415
12/21/2020
Solid
% Solids:71.5 12/23/2020 0125
Inorganic non-metals
Run Prep Method Analytical Method Dilution Analysis Date Analyst Prep Date Batch
1 3060A (Hexavalent C) 7199 1 12/30/2020 1607 AMR 12/29/2020 1733 77940
AnalyticalCAS
Parameter Number Method Result Q LOQ Units Run DL
Hexavalent Chromium 18540-29-9 7199 2.0 1mg/kg0.281.4
J = Estimated result < LOQ and > DL_
LOQ = Limit of Quantitation B = Detected in the method blank E = Quantitation of compound exceeded the calibration range
P = The RPD between two GC columns exceeds 40%ND = Not detected at or above the DL N = Recovery is out of criteria
H = Out of holding time
DL = Detection Limit
W = Reported on wet weight basis
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.pacelabs.com
Pace Analytical Services, LLC (formerly Shealy Environmental Services, Inc.)

Page 8 of 15 Page 19 of 26
Description:Matrix:
Date Received:
Client:Laboratory ID:
Date Sampled:
Waypoint Analytical
BG-0127-5
VL21023-005
12/17/2020 1420
12/21/2020
Solid
% Solids:80.2 12/21/2020 2259
Inorganic non-metals
Run Prep Method Analytical Method Dilution Analysis Date Analyst Prep Date Batch
1 3060A (Hexavalent C) 7199 1 12/30/2020 1620 AMR 12/29/2020 1733 77940
AnalyticalCAS
Parameter Number Method Result Q LOQ Units Run DL
Hexavalent Chromium 18540-29-9 7199 0.62 J 1mg/kg0.251.2
J = Estimated result < LOQ and > DL_
LOQ = Limit of Quantitation B = Detected in the method blank E = Quantitation of compound exceeded the calibration range
P = The RPD between two GC columns exceeds 40%ND = Not detected at or above the DL N = Recovery is out of criteria
H = Out of holding time
DL = Detection Limit
W = Reported on wet weight basis
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.pacelabs.com
Pace Analytical Services, LLC (formerly Shealy Environmental Services, Inc.)

Page 9 of 15 Page 20 of 26
QC Summary
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.pacelabs.com
Pace Analytical Services, LLC (formerly Shealy Environmental Services, Inc.)

Page 10 of 15 Page 21 of 26
Inorganic non-metals - MB
Batch:Prep Method:
Prep Date:
Sample ID:VQ77940-001
77940 3060A
12/29/2020 1733Analytical Method:7199
Matrix:Solid
Parameter Result Q LOQ DL Units Analysis DateDil
Hexavalent Chromium ND 12/30/2020 10431.0 0.20 mg/kg1
Note:Calculations are performed before rounding to avoid round-off errors in calculated results
LOQ = Limit of Quantitation ND = Not detected at or above the DL
J = Estimated result < LOQ and > DL
N = Recovery is out of criteria
P = The RPD between two GC columns exceeds 40%
+ = RPD is out of criteria
_DL = Detection Limit
* = RSD is out of criteria
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.pacelabs.com
Pace Analytical Services, LLC (formerly Shealy Environmental Services, Inc.)

Page 11 of 15 Page 22 of 26
Inorganic non-metals - LCS
Batch:Prep Method:
Prep Date:
Sample ID:VQ77940-002
77940 3060A
12/29/2020 1733Analytical Method:7199
Matrix:Solid
Parameter
Result
Q % Rec
Spike
Amount
Analysis Date
% Rec
LimitDil(mg/kg) (mg/kg)
Hexavalent Chromium 9.9 12/30/2020 1056991080-1201
Note:Calculations are performed before rounding to avoid round-off errors in calculated results
LOQ = Limit of Quantitation ND = Not detected at or above the DL
J = Estimated result < LOQ and > DL
N = Recovery is out of criteria
P = The RPD between two GC columns exceeds 40%
+ = RPD is out of criteria
_DL = Detection Limit
* = RSD is out of criteria
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.pacelabs.com
Pace Analytical Services, LLC (formerly Shealy Environmental Services, Inc.)

Page 12 of 15 Page 23 of 26
Chain of Custody
and
Miscellaneous Documents
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.pacelabs.com
Pace Analytical Services, LLC (formerly Shealy Environmental Services, Inc.)

Page 13 of 15 Page 24 of 26
PACE ANALYTICAL SERVICES, LLC

106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.pacelabs.com
Pace Analytical Services, LLC (formerly Shealy Environmental Services, Inc.)

Page 14 of 15 Page 25 of 26
PACE ANALYTICAL SERVICES, LLC

106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.pacelabs.com
Pace Analytical Services, LLC (formerly Shealy Environmental Services, Inc.)

Page 15 of 15 Page 26 of 26