5701_ROSCANS_2000

w: 1 f,
2
0.
,
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WASTE MANAGEMENT
February 2, 2000
Mr. Larry Lackey
Macon County Solid Waste Director
109 Sierra Drive
Franklin, N,C. 28734
Re: Landfill Gas Assessment at the Closed Macon County Franklin and Highlands
Landfills (Permit #57-01 and 57-02).
Dear Mr. Lackey,
The landfill gas survey report submitted on behalf of Macon County by McGill and
Associates dated May 10, 1999, has been reviewed. The following comments and
questions were generated by the Solid Waste Section during the review.
1. The primary purpose of the landfill gas survey was to detect migration of gas across
the County's property boundary through conductive zones in the subsurface, especially
in areas near existing domiciles. Utilizing the existing ground water monitoring wells,
gas was detected in significant quantities deep in the saprolitic zone. Reportedly, the
waste is on the order of tens of feet thick. Please provide justification for the three foot
maximum depth of the gas monitoring probes installed during this investigation.
2. The gas monitoring probes should be constructed to have an access port to which
gas monitoring equipment can be attached so that the probe remains as a "closed
system.". This recommended design is to prevent ambient atmospheric dilution that
results in unreliable and inconsistent data generation. A guidance document on
landfill gas probe construction and data gathering is available from.the Solid Waste
Association of North America upon request.
3. Soil classifications can provide insight into the gas migration pathways. Please
provide a description of the soils encountered during the installation of the probes.
4. Time and weather conditions (i.e. barometric pressure) are important factors.
Please include this data in all future reports.
5. Based upon the data in the report, routine monitoring of the gas at the Franklin site
is needed. Please propose a monitoring plan and a schedule for Section approval
within 60 days. Address the comments provided in this letter in the next submittal.
! ANE RlLN "
1646 MAIL SERVICE CENTER, RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27699-1646
401 OBERLIN ROAD, SUITE 150, RALEIGH, NC 27605
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY / AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 50% RECYCLED/10q POST -CONSUMER PAPER

Piea5p call Me if you have any questions or comments at 919-733-0692, extension
261.
Sincerely,
Mark Poindexter
Environmental Compliance
Solid Waste Section
ci
Philip Prete
Brent Rockett
Jim Patterson

McGiff
A S S O C I A T E S
June 18, 1999
Mr. Tim Jewett
Division of Solid Waste Management
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
585 Waughtown Street
Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27107
Dear Tim:
A P P R 0 VAEOEDMENT
DIVISION F SOLID W
DATE 3 3 20od BY
49U COPY rail J i/V /1
RE: Landfill Cap Repair and
Re -Use Plan
Franklin Landfill
Macon County, North Carolina
On behalf of Macon County, we are submitting plans for a Landfill Cap Repair and Re -
Use Plan for the old Franklin Landfill in Macon County, North Carolina. Please find enclosed
three (3) copies of the plan.
Macon County proposes to repair the landfill cap in areas where settlement has
occurred to improve surface water run-off from the landfill cap. The repairs will consist of
adding fill material in the areas shown on the attached drawing to provide for a minimum 3 %
slope.
• . In conjunction with the cap repairs, Macon County requests approval to allow the use
of the closed landfill as an airfield for the local model airplane club. The airfield would
require the installation of a gravel access road and parking area and a preparation of a soil base
for the runway. The runway will be a 40'x 240' canvas mat rolled onto the prepared soil base.
As shown on the grading plan, the area for the gravel access road and parking area will have a
minimum of 6 inches of soil placed prior to the placement of gravel. The runway will be
placed on minimum of 1 foot of additional soil fill. The additional fill will allow Macon
County to till and compact the soil under the runway without disturbing the existing cap.
E n g i n e e r i n g • P l a n n i n g F i n a n c e
Xl< Gill ASSO( itifCA, P.A. • P.O. Box 2.59, Asheville, NC 28802 • 55 Broad Street, Asheville, NC 28N01
828-252-0575 • FAX [phone]

Mr. Jewett
June 18, 1999
Page 2
Macon County would like to begin work on this project within the next month. Thank
you for your assistance and please call should you have any question or need additional
information.
Sincerely,
McGI/L%L A S CIATES, P.A.
� J
J I FFRLY R: BISHOP, P.E.
Enclosure
cc: Mr. Larry Lackey w/ enclosure
Mr. Jim Patterson w/enclosure
Mr. Julian Foscue w/enclosure
93141.00/tj 18jun9. doc

Q��
NCDENR
NORTh CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WASTE MANAGEMENT
F `
October 30, 2000 p�ea°
.JAMES B. HUNT JR. RECEIVED
GOVERNOR Mr. Larry Lackey N.C. Dept. Of ����
Macon County Solid Waste Director NOV
109 Sierra Drive 3 20(0
Franklin, N.C.28734 WinSto.ri ^�J.m
BILL HOLMAN
SECRETARY RE: Keener Well Evaluation Report - Franklin Closed Landfill (Per�iii�VPP 1'-010 flCe
Macon County
WILLIAM L. MEYER Dear Mr. Lackey:
DIRECTOR
The Solid Waste Section has reviewed the above referenced report submitted on behalf of Macon
County by the Fletcher Group, Inc. of North Carolina. The report summarizes actions taken by
Macon County dealing with possible private well contamination adjacent to the Franklin closed
landfill. It also makes recommendations for addressing the situation.
I have discussed the matter with Mr. Jim McElduff of the Fl-etcher Group and recommend
proceeding with the proposed actions, with one exception, as they relate to the additional
sampling and analysis and verification that the Keener residence is connected to a public water
supply. The exception concerns recommendation number 6. If metals' concentrations exceed
EPA drinking water standards or if any man-made organic compounds are detected, a health risk
evaluation should be done.
Your are also advised to follow all recommendations from Dr. Ken Rudo of the Occupational
and Environmental Epidemiology Branch. According to the report, the well was resampled in
July at Dr. Rudo's advice, and the data was submitted to him for a health risk evaluation. Dr.
Rudo and the Macon County Health Department, can recommend the necessary steps to ensure a
health risk is eliminated in case the well is still being used.
Thank you for your cooperation with this matter. If you have any questions, please call me at
[phone], extension 257.
S' ely,
c� y`
"aR
Environmental Specialist
Solid Waste Section
cc: Phil Prete - Head, Field Operations Branch
Brent Rockett - Western District Supervisor
Jim Patterson - Waste Management Specialist
Dr. Ken Rudo - Toxicologist - Occupational and Envir. Epi. Branch
James McElduff, P.E. - Fletcher Group of North Carolina
macon.wpd
..Slri axGR+ta
1646 MAIL SERVICE CENTER, RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27699-1646
401 OBERLIN ROAD, SUITE 150, RALEIGH, NC 27605
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY / AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 50% RECYCLED/10% POST -CONSUMER PAPER

r V / -4 �,l
o 7 O-W, P7/
//
�YY
September 10, 2000
rAl
Fletcher Group
O F N O R T H C A R O L I N A
ENGINEERING & ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS
Mr. Larry Rose
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Waste Management
1646 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1646
Subject: Old Franklin Landfill
Macon County, North Carolina
Keener Well Evaluation
Dear Mr. Rose:
FLETCHER GROUP, INC.
FLETCHER GROUP, INC.
OF NORTH CAROLINA
FLETCHER ENGINEERING
PIEDMONT INDUSTRIAL
WASTE SERVICES
PIEDMONT PRODUCTS
The Fletcher Group has completed an evaluation of laboratory data related to water samples collected
from the Keener domestic well. The Keener home is located on Memory Lane, approximately 550-feet
east of Lake Emory Road, near the Old Franklin Landfill. The general vicinity is approximately two
miles north-northeast of downtown Franklin, North Carolina.
BACKGROUND
The Old Franklin Landfill is located approximately 400-feet to 1,000-feet east of several residences
located on Lake Emory Road. The general area is shown on Figure 1. Although potable water is
provided to the neighborhood through a distribution network owned and operated by the Town of
Franklin, water wells are known to be located on two of the nearby residential properties west-northwest
and west-southwest of the landfill. These wells are located on properties owned by Mr. and Mrs. Dale
Dowdle and Mr. and Mrs. Cletus Keener, respectively.
The Dowdle property, on which a home is located approximately 600-feet west of the landfill, includes a
well that is used for non -potable purposes. On August 30, 2000, The Fletcher Group verified that the
Dowdle residence is connected to the Town of Franklin water supply. The Dowdles receive water
through an account in the name of Mr. Ted Cabe.
The Keener property, which is located approximately 400-feet west-southwest of the landfill, also
includes a water well. The Keener residence does not have a water account in the Keener name.
However, Mr. Jay Gibson, an employee with the Public Works Department, stated to The Fletcher Group
on August 30, 2000 that the Keener residence is connected to the Town of Franklin water supply.
As part of routine compliance activities conducted in accordance with landfill Permit No. 57-01, the
Macon County Solid Waste Department (Solid Waste Department) analyzes groundwater quality in the
vicinity surrounding the Old Franklin Landfill semi-annually. The Dowdle and Keener wells are two of
the wells included in the monitoring program.
In correspondence dated March 8, 2000, from the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural
Resources (DENR) to the Solid Waste Department, DENR required that the Solid Waste Department
I5
781/2 Patton Avenue Asheville, NC 28801 [phone] Fax [phone] www.fletchergroup.com 41®4

Mr. Larry Rose
September 10, 2000
Page 2 of 5
provide groundwater monitoring results from recent testing to the Macon County Health Department
(Health Department). The Solid Waste Department provided the requested analytical results to the Health
Department during March 2000.
In response, Mr. Patrick Muse, a technician employed by the Health Department, collected samples from
the two potable water wells. The samples were analyzed by the State Laboratory of Public Health (State
Laboratory) for Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs). The laboratory data sheets show that samples
were collected from the Dowdle and Keener wells on May 22, 2000. These and other data sheets
provided by the Health Department are enclosed.
Following receipt of results from the State Laboratory, Mr. Muse reviewed the analytical data with Dr.
Ken Rudo. Dr. Rudo is a toxicologist with the North Carolina Department of Public Health. Mr. Muse
reported to the Fletcher Group that Dr. Rudo stated that the Dowdle well would not require additional
sampling by the Health Department. None of the parameters detected in the Dowdle well exceed the
DENR groundwater standards (North Carolina Administrative Code, Title 15A, Subchapter 2L).
However, -Dr. Rudo asked that the Keener well be sampled again.v
The Keener well was resampled by Mr. Muse on July 6, 2000. The analytical results were provided to the
Solid Waste Department on approximately August 8, 2000. These latter results generally confirmed those- 1
obtained from the sample collected on May 22, 2000. The analytical results are summarized in the e, ` W2.5
attached table.
The Solid Waste Department retained the Fletcher Group on June 26, 2000 to evaluate the pertinent
analytical data and field information, and recommend an appropriate course of action. Since the DENR
groundwater standards were not exceeded in the Dowdle well, and because Dr. Rudo did not request that
the Dowdle well be resampled, this evaluation focuses exclusively on the Keener well. It was conducted
after receipt of the State Laboratory data on August 8, 2000.
The evaluation included the following elements:
• Review of State Health Department analytical data for groundwater.
• Review of analytical data for groundwater provided by Pin -Point Environmental Services,
Inc. (Pin -Point) and Pisgah Environmental (Pisgah).
• Evaluation of hydrogeological information provided by Pin -Point, Pisgah, and Terra
Consultants (Terra).
• Observations of conditions at the landfill and on the Keener property.
FINDINGS
The findings are organized in the following categories:
Laboratory data
1. Laboratory analyses of groundwater samples by the State Laboratory resulted in detections of
six VOCs in the May 22, 2000 sample and five VOCs in the July 6, 2000 sample.

Mr. Larry Rose
September 10, 2000
Page 3 of 5
2. The six VOCs were Acetone, Benzene, Chlorobenzene, 1, 4-Dichloroethene, Methyl-tert-
butyl-ether, and Tetrachloroethene.
3. Five of the six VOCs were detected on both occasions. Acetone was the exception.
4. One compound, Benzene, was present in the State Laboratory analyses at a concentration
exceeding the DENR groundwater standard. Benzene was detected at a concentration of 1.1
micrograms per liter (µg/L). The DENR groundwater standard for benzene is 1.0 µg/L.
5. Quality assurance / quality control issues could not be evaluated due to the fact that the State
Laboratory did not provide any related documentation with the analytical results.
6. Mr. John Neal, Organics Supervisor in the State Health Department Laboratory, stated on
August 8, 2000, that the samples were screened with a gas chromatograph using a
photoionization detector. The screening results were confirmed with mass
spectrophotometry. He said that he was confident that the results were valid.
7. Mr. Neal also stated that drinking water and hazardous waste samples are analyzed on the
same piece of equipment in the laboratory.
8. Laboratory analyses of groundwater samples (collected by Pisgah on October 22, 1999 and
May 5, 2000) by Specialized Assays also resulted in detections of three VOCs.
9. The three VOCs were 1,4-Dichlorobenzene, cis-1,2-Dichloroethene, and Tetrachloroethene.
10. The three VOCs detected by Specialized Assays were also detected by the State Laboratory at
comparable concentrations.
11. Laboratory Method Detection Limits associated with analytical methods specified by the
DENR Solid Waste regulations are higher than those used for the drinking water analyses
performed by the State Laboratory.
12. As a result, the State Laboratory detected four VOCs at concentrations lower than the
detection limits used for compliance with Solid Waste regulations.
Hydrogeological Information
1. Shallow groundwater in the vicinity of the southwest corner of the landfill appears to flowing
toward the Keener property.
2. There is no well construction information for the nearby landfill monitoring wells MW-2 or
MW-3.
3. There are inadequate data to interpret the characteristics of groundwater flow through
fractures in the bedrock.
4. The Keener well draws water from fractured bedrock.
5. Neither Mr. Keener nor the Health Department has well construction information for the
Keener well. However, Mr. Keener reported that the well is approximately 200-feet deep.
(Note: The Fletcher Group has observed domestic potable water wells constructed without
adequate seals between shallow groundwater and deep groundwater.)

Mr. Larry Rose
September 10, 2000
Page 4 of 5
Field Conditions and Other Factors
1. Methyl-tert-butyl-ether, detected on both occasions by the State Laboratory, did not come
into common usage until approximately 1983.
2. Mr. Neal stated that Methyl-tert-butyl-ether is "almost always" associated with gasoline.
3. Aerial photographs taken in 1982 and 1994 suggest that the southerly portions of the landfill
near the Keener property were filled prior to 1982.
4. Numerous one- and two -gallon gasoline cans were observed by Fletcher Group personnel
within approximately 10-feet of the Keener well on August 8, 2000.
5. Mr. Keener stated that he normally stores gasoline near his well.
CONCLUSIONS
1. The correlation between the various analytical data sets suggests that the State Laboratory
data are valid.
2. None of the data collected for compliance with Solid Waste regulations refutes data
developed by the State Laboratory.
3. Even though site conditions on the Keener property (e.g., well construction, gasoline storage,
well depth) suggest the possibility that the source of VOCs may be located on the property,
the hydrogeological information does not preclude the possibility that the landfill is the
source of contamination.
RECOMMENDATIONS
rr'2 1. Resample the Keener water supply at the point of exposure (i.e., the kitchen tap).
oiv 2. Collect a second sample from the Keener well head tap,
3. Resample MW-3. — 6rk. 4D Fa. , t'At' , c,
4. Test all three samples for VOCs using an � alytical method with low detection limits (e.g.,
US EPA Method 6230D).
5. If the results are less than DENR groundwater standards, then return to routine monitoring
S using low detection limits in the two wells.
s p ,�. 6. If the results continue to exceed DENR groundwater standards, then conduct a health -based
risk assessment using the concentration identified at the point of exposure.
7. If the risk assessment indicates that there are no significant health risks, then send the
�l)Cs der 1ie� conclusions to the local and State Health Departments, the Keeners, and the Solid Waste
Section.
'8�. If the risk assessment indicates a significant risk, then verify that the Keener residence has a
;R►�� ax `�, tap to the Town of Franklin water supply and notify the Keeners that they should use the
treated water.
In any case, send all pertinent information to the Keeners, Dr. Ken Rudo, the Macon County
y. Health Department, and the Solid Waste Section.

Mr. Larry Rose
September 10, 2000
Page 5 of 5
Mr. Rose, please contact us at your convenience to discuss this evaluation.
Sincerely,
The Fletcher Group, Inc.
Ja Elduff, P.E.SMect neer
Stuart A. Ryman, P.G.
Project Geologist
enclosures: Site Location Map
Table - Summary of Analytical Results
State Laboratory of Public Health - Analytical Data Sheets
cc: Mr. Patrick Muse/Macon County Health Department
Mr. Larry A. Lackey/Macon County Engineering & Public Works

.. �-��, ��� � �; _= �,.i ram. =� t �., �-" . , •-:����-�;���,P��w l�
u ( 'J \•,III Bm
POR
,0
° • .� ..i `--� `._ _,:\ n !Dean • � - - �,�
SITE
i t •{ �g al LOCATION
• _— 21
_
J .
`1 I
39 i
14
ir
n `
♦~may`• �� �' I i o \ %�'�V _ `oaf-♦--, r I �!\ ;l_\�a?oo •it > N M1�.
\. o
%.,
,IIII
.. -
Jale .�. 9 st, ' `klin _ •- �j
' �� \ �s�, ' .//i/ .._.;� �..• �.; loans
till . `\�� 7, • %Y%/.• :T —� hap I Fa e
//.•'. -
Macon County FIGURE 1
Project No. 2053.01 Site Location Map
August 30, 2000 Old Franklin Landfill
Scale: finch = 2000 feet
U.S.G.S. Topographic Map - 7.5 Minute Quadrangle
JdW
THE FLETCHER UPICRata Corbin Knob and Franklin, North Carolina

Q
Lij
DRIVE ROAD
4 W HEEL
/
/
�:
CIO
.
0 ,
/
to
w
co
= rd a
/ 2 lam .... .'
/
.. ..
..... ._............
/
L
to
,ow
co
N w;
di '\
co
o
/
60Z_
N
\
LO
\
NW
N
......_......_....
,
CA to
i
0) O
-1O
W N
to
O
a
N
0
cq
O_
�
--
-'
Q
W
In
w
vi
O
�
�
W
Q
Z
W
W
�
W
�o
a
w
-
W
�
o
O
Q
U

I- C)
� r-i
IP,
r-
C>
Vl
IN IN N
N
QICV
z
cri
QII
IN,
al
z
z zlz
Z;
4) cn cl
bo
Cd CL
42
z
z z
z z
4-
4-
L6;
C;!
c> c>
cr-*
cd
+C�
0
C)
o
.00 -10
0
.q r- C'I
\4R
-CO13
E
lz
1 00
r-
o C�5 i o
r-
E
rA
co
E
N a) r
E
Ilb
co 03
al
01
-0 ri)
:tR
Cd 0 L
of
-0
E
E
E
0 0 cid-
N
Up
=
i E
a,,
a
E
N d)
a 0
Z
E
0
0
Z C's
0
c
0
E/) V)
E r C
> a
En 0
.2 E
a i , —
1
0
V. Cd 1
L) E
E E
E
'd
E
C'3
�,i U
0 C�
0
�'�jQ
C13 I
cn
Ui Nj
I-
I IQ
CO IU
O
\6 , r- 00 CT

. j
a
j
O
O
I O
r
N�
N
O
'
O
a>
I
C
14
a
Cj
o
t�
Z�Z
ZIZ
zlz
Z
t
4"
.5
>;
y
O
j
I I
I ai
P,
q
I
I I A
O
zzlz
z
z
z
z
I iron
I
I
I
O
!
cd
I
� i-•
+'
i'a
U
Vl
t(1
l/')
t/')
In
t/')
V1
t/')
�
—I
"�I
o
oIo
O
o
0
0
o
I
>
y
!�
I I N
�
En
�
N
g°
'0o
p
44
,'A1i,
V
bA
N
N
cOi
tom..
cOi i
� I
cOi
sue.
p
sue.
p
c�i
�
w
Cd
x
�
�
O
i `�
I i
�
c
.G
O
rn
�" I
I
H
�' i
[�
i
i j
I
E"',
tom,
E•",
I
y
•
U
y
i COO
I
y
O
d
3
,',��_,
;
A
0
'~�
'
'C3
N
a
N
b
4)
N
>~
C
O
CA
r/En
p O
O
N
b
I
cd
U
W
GoZ;•
U
Oyu
O
2
O
,.O
o
+�+
a�
�
s...
I
v�
y
C
Cd
N
c0
O
�n i � C
cd c� ; W
I O
�
I c�
V
=
ZI
A
O
A
°�
o
�' °'1=m
I E
N
U
Q
pql
a�
I .c
Id�
N
v�
•U
I
�~-�
C/]
.- I
.-�
E
H
•-
N
M
ch
V�
�p j j oo
O�

N. C. Department of Health and Human Services
State Laboratory of Public Health ,PETROLEUM p%OUCTS
P.O.Box 28047, Raleigh, N.C. 27611
Environmental Sciences Analysis Report
Name of Owner, Patient '1
or Supply: Telephone #
Address: ' (C �� County: Ma"
Zip:
****************************************************************************
Report to: Environmental Health Section Collected By:---�L-kr�c Y- W-k --s-'e
Macon County Public Health Center PZ$
Telephone #I"gjhgmas Heights Rd. Telephone # ()
F`raanPinin,
Address: E2ff - 3 v9 - 2-0 2" )
Date Collected:
Analysis Desired: �✓ L�
Laboratory
Number
Sample #
Sample Description or Remarks
Results In
ATTACHED SHEET(9)
C� Z-
Date Received ; T — Z-6-- 20od Date
Reported 1 U N 0 6 2000
Date Extracted Date An
Reported
wpe[visor
Organic CherntsW
DBBS Form 2364 Revised (11-97)
Laboratory
Esadrptfrm

Dl% ISION OF HEALTH 0D HL1L%N SER IES
-�T k TE LABOILNTORy OF PLBLIC HE.-kL LH
PO BOX =S047 - 306 N. WILXIL",GTON ST.. RILEIGH. `C'_1b1 i
Purgeable Organic Compounds by
Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry
Dow) L G LABORATORY #00 d- 5 55
COMPOUND
Chloromethane
2.
g/L
COMPOUND
1.2-Dichioropropane
.NIDL :]E:
0.5 µ2,L
l�
i Vinyl Chloride
2.0 uvL
Dibromomethane
0.5 µ2/L
Bromomethane
2.0 pJL
Bromodichloromethane
0.5 pJL
Chloroethane
2.0 pvL
cis-1,3-Dicbloropropene
0.5 µJL
Trich torofluoromethane
2.0 pgfL
4-'Ylethyl-2-Pentanone
0.5 pc -IL
1,1-Dichloroethene
0.5 µg/L
Toluene
0.5 µJI-
Acetone
2.0 µg/L
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
0.5 µ2/L
Iodomethane
0.5 pg/L
1,1.2-Trichloroethane
0.5 p2/L
Carbon Disulfide
0.5 pe.-L
Tetrachloroethene
0.5 µ2iL
Methylene Chloride
0.5 pg/L
2-Hesanone
0.5 u2/L
Acrvlonitrile
0.5 pe.1
Dibromochloromethane
0.5 µ2/L
trarLs-l.2-Dichloroethene
0.5 µL
Ethylene Dibromide 6
0.5 u°!L
tilethyl-t-Butyl-Ether
0.5 p2,'L
N
Chlorobenzene
10.5 uJL
1,1-Dichloroethene
0.5 µJL
C
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane
0.5 pJL
Isopropyl Ether
OS µJL
Ethyl Benzene
0.5 µJL
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
0.5 µe/L
0 ,
Xylenes
0.5 µ2/L
2-Butanone
2.0 µA
Styrene
0.5 µJL
Tetrahydrofuran
2.0 pg/L
Bromoform
0.5 p'/L
Chloroform
0.5 µg/L
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
0.5 µJL
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
0.5 µg/L
1,2,3-Trichloropropane
0.5 pJL
Carbon Tetrachloride
0.5 µe/L
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
0.5 µ2/L
O�J
Benzene
0.5 µJL
1.2-Dichlorobenzene
0.5 p21L
►"
1,2-Dichloroethane
0.5 pJL
1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane
2.0 pgf
Trichloroethene
0.5 µg/L
-� race-
trace- detected, but less than IVIDL NIDL = Mnimum Detection Limit
C • Possible lab contamination or background
J Estlmnited Value
K • Actual value Is known to be less than value given.
L • Actual value Is known to be. greater than slue given.
U • Material was analyzed for but not detected. The number is the Minimum Detection Limit.
1/-Tentativeldentlacaflon.
D .Sample diluted. h1DLs do not apply.
a;\nancy.frm (3101D)

N. C. Department of Health and Human Services
State Laboratory of Public Health PETROLEUM P
P.O.Box 28047, Raleigh, N.C. 27611 ROOUCtS
Environmental Sciences Analysis Report contain 1:1
Name of Owner. P tient
or Supply:. �-P-eY-L — Telephone # e
Address: County: M(a. -.
�C // • �(/0 7- fin/ 0 u 2
Zip: ICG1� 7'-7ZC-'S
****************************************************************************
Report to:
t5vironmental Meaitji n
Telephone # aco County Public Health Center
Franklin, NC 28734
Address:
Collected By:
Telephone # 7 0 3�i 9 .�� �/
Date Collected: -5/ Z 2 ��
Analysis Desired:
Laboratory Sample # Sample Description or Remarks Results In
Number
002556 ATTA('4m,
0
20�0 Reported Date Received � 2 5 r- Date Re rted JUN 0 6 20M
Date Extracted Date Analyzed oa k (P -( 0—y -4
Reported By: �` _
PhVi
L. NeNSgpelvlsormnMontaI rgantcChatRisitY
DHHS Form 2364 Revised (11-M
Laboratory
Esanitptfrm

DI% ISION OF HEALTH .%ND HL1La SE ES
STATE LAB()R.kT0RY OF PUBLIC HEALTH
PU B 0 X '50-1- - 'Uri N. S VLLNIL,GTON 5T.. R-kLEIGH. NC 27611
Pur.,eable Or;anic Compounds by
Gas Chromatographyf..Nlass Spectrometry
LABORATORY ii i
CON•EPOUND
Chloromethane
>IDL µtyL
I
2.0 µyL �r QCe
CO`IPOC\D
1:'-Dichloropropane
>IDL py/-L
0.5 µJL
I
j Vinyl Chloride
2.0 ps-L
I
Dibromomethane
0.5 µJL
i
i
Bromomethane
2.0 µg/L
Bromodichloromethane
0.5 µe/L
Chloroethane
2.0 p JL
I
-� mC
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
0.5 µJL
Trichlorotluoromethane
2.0 pgf-
4-Methyl-2-Pentanone
0.5 pgfL
1,1-Dichloroethene
0.5 pg/L
Toluene
0.5 µJL
Acetone
2.0 µg/L
3 f7 �'K
trans-1,3•Dichloropropene
0.5 µe/L
lodomethane
0.5 µgfL
1,1.2-Trichloroethane
0.5 pe/L
Carbon Disulfide
0.5 p2:L
I
Tetrachloroethene
0.5 ug!L
Methylene Chloride
0.5 µg!L
I
I
2-Hexanone
0.5 p-JL
Acrylonitrile
0.5 p2!L
Dibromochloromethane
0.5 µJL
i
trans-lam-Dichloroethene
0.5 po•`L
Ethylene Dibromide
0.5 µJL
Methyl-t-Butyl•Ether
0.5 µ9"L
I
I 'D
_
Chlorobenzene
0.5 pJL
O
1,1-Dichloroethane
0.5 pJL
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane
0.5 pg/L
Isopropyl Ether
0.5 µJL
Ethyl Benzene
0.5 pJL
cis- 1,2-Dichloroethene
0.5 p_g/L
(,
Xylenes
0.5 µg/L
2-Butanone
2.0 µJL
Styrene
0.5 µJL
Tetrahydrofuran
2.0 µJL
Bromoform
0.5 µJL
Chloroform
0.5 µJL
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
0.5 µJL
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
0.5 µg/L
1,2,3-Trichloropropane
0.5 pJL
0.5 pJL
,
Carbon Tetrachloride
0.5 µJL
4,4-Dichlorobenzene
Benzene
0.5 pJL
, ,
1.2-Dichlorobenzene
. OS µJL
1-1-Dichloroethane
0.5 pJL
1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane
2.0 pg/L
Trichloroethene
0.5 pg/L
i54h e r
trace- detected, but less than IVIDL ivIDL = 4lnimum Detection Limit
C • Possible lab contamination or background
J • Estlmated Value
K -Actual value Is known to be less than value given.
L • Actual value Is known to be greater than value given.
U - Material was analyzed for but not detected. The number is the Minimum Detection Limit.
1/Tentative Identification.
D -Sample diluted. NIDLs do not apply.
a:Xnancy.rrm (3100)

FROM Macon Co. Public Health Ci :r PHONE NO. : 8283494136 Aug. 08 2000 05:22AM P2
N.C. Department of HeWth and Huma
n Services V
Division of Public Health
State Laboratory of Public Health Piaase Rod instruction sa*c
P.O. Box 28047, 306 N. Wilmington St., Raleigh, NC 27611-8047VOA vi k contain IJ HCI.
Environmental Sciences Analysis Report
N9me of Owner, Patient
Or Supply:
Address:
zip:
Telephone it
County: 90'6y�-
lVo%: ivL) Tifi/D QLAN%
W l rN —/,Ff is _1Xn j2E
■ / / /.�7//r�r■ tt1�.TN s r� �,./ U� :ram//./// / / // /i / /a a �:rll t/ � r/-� / � ra � � �.o� / rim / / � � /ti C / 1 �a /-f� /:. s ram./ / 1 ►ems/ � 1
Report to: Collected By: \ a, L� 5 Q--
nvtronmen a a► ion
Telephone #t ( � County Public Health Center
j1397tiomas Heights Ad.
Address: 9734
Date Received:.
—7— -7— D 0 tN '--
Date Extracted:
DHHS Form 2364
Laboratory (&v.06199)
F_anlrpt
Telephone #+ ( 11t � 4 9 ' Zo 8
Date Collected:! _% &�0 d
Analysis Desired: JO G.
Date Repo,,: J U L 2 7 2000
Date Analyze Y 0
Reported y:
n aal, uperviaot
nvironmental Organic chemistry

.FROM : Macon Co. Public Health _rater PHONE NO. 8283494136 Aug. 08 2000 05:23AN P3
STATE i...a9OR.aT0Rl OF PLBLIC HF..�LTH
pO BOX 28041 - 306 N. ` rLNIL\GTON ST.. RaLEIGH. NC 27611
0
\
Rurgeoble Orgariic Compounds by
Gas Chromatography/'rlass Spectrometry
KGt% �� 2 LABORATORY #�-
CO:v(POUK)
i`tAL
µglL
COINIPOUND
µg/L
2.0 µg/L
1
-} rQ
lr•DtchloroProprine
0•- P€!t
�1
Chloromcibane
2.0 µ,/L
DibfDM0MEthene
0.5 µS/L
Vinyl Chloride
Bromomethane
2.0 µg/t
Bromodicbloromethane
0.5 VS/L
2.0 µA
cis. 1,3-Dich!oropropcnc
Chloroeihane
Trichloro(luoromethane
20 pA
4•Methyl-2-Pentanone
0.5 µVL
1,1-Dichlorocthene '
0.5 µp/L
Totuenc
0.5 µJL
,ketone
2 0 µs/L
Iron5.1,3-Dlchloroprope ne
0.5 PA-
lodomethane
0.5 µgX
1,14•Trichloroethane
0.: pg/L
0.: u_,L (
t
Carbon Disulfide
0.5 PJL
Tttrachloroethene
hlethylene Chloride
0.5 PVL
`
2.13esanone
0.5 gA
Crylonitrile
0.5 µg/L
Dibrwnxhioromethane 10.5
pa/L
erani•1�•Diehloroethcnc
0.5 µall
Ethylcnc Dibromide
0.3 pJL
M[ethyl•t-Butyl•Ether
0.5 pal
r
Q t 6
0.5 pJl
D r
1,1•Dichloroethane
0.5 Pg/L
�- r��
[Chlorobettzenc
1111-2-Tttrachlorocihane
0.5 P_Il-IsopropylEther
0.5µg/L
�'(] C�thyl
Benzene
0.5 pg/L
I cis.1,2-Dichloroethene
0.5 P.P./
� 19
Xrlencs
0.5 µ;IL
2-Butunone
2.0 pg/L
Styrene
0.5 pa/L
Te[rahydrotLran
2.0pa/L
I �Q
13romoform
0.5 p^_/L
Chloroform
0.5 pg/L
1,1,2,2-Tetrsdtloroeth2ie
0.5 µV`1
1,1,1-Trichloroeth2ne
0.5 Pg/L
1,1,3•Trichloropropane
0.5 pg/L
Carbon Tetrachloride
0.5 pg/L
10-Dichlorob traene
05 µg/L
�.
Benzene
0.5 µfit.
' .'
1,2.Dichloruberuenc
0.5 PSIL
-}•Y•acP_
1,2-Dichloroeth3ne
0.5 pe/L
L)-
1,2•Dihromo-3•Chloropropnnc
2.0 pg/L
U_-
+
I
e__+her-'
Q I U
Trichlorocthent
0.5 P>/L
a
truce - detected, but less than t%ML %fDL = Nlrn mntn Detection Limit
C • Poisible lab erontarnin=tMn or background
J - Estimated Value
K . Actual value k krnetrn to be Icss than value eivtrt.
L • Actual valve is known to be greater than .roles giv cn.
U • Mutarial %+as a"vred for but not dtt«nd. The number Is the Knimum Decctlon Limit.
41 - Tentailte WentMcation.

Arnm
,i -WA
NC®ENR
..LAMES B. HUNT JR.
GOVERNOR
BILL HOLMAN
SECRETARY
WILLIAM L. MEYER.
DIRECTOR -
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WASTE MANAGEMENT
March 8, 2000
Mr. Larry Lackey
Macon County Solid Waste Director
109 Sierra Drive
Franklin, N.C. 28734
RE: Potable Well Sampling Results from Residences Located Near Macon County's
Closed Franklin Landfill (Permit # 57-01)
Dear Mr. Lackey:
The October 1999 semi-annual water quality monitoring report for the above
referenced landfill includes test results of potable well samples from several private
residences located nearby. The two wells labeled as Dowdle and Keener indicate the
presence of a number of man-made organic compounds. Although the source of the
compounds is not known, these chemicals are not naturally occurring and they have
the potential to pose certain health risks. As a result, this situation should be
addressed immediately.
Please provide the Macon County Health Department with a copy of these test results.
The Health Department can review the data and, if necessary, recommend actions
needed to protect public health. In addition, within the next 30 days, please advise this
office of the Health Department's assessment of the data and any steps taken by Macon
County to deal with the matter.
Thank you for your cooperation in resolving this concern. If you have any questions,
please call me at [phone], extension 257.
Sin rely, j2, 5'_
Larry Rose)
Environmental Specialist
Solid Waste section
cc: Philip Prete, Head - Field Operations Branch
Brent Rockett - Western Region Supervisor
Jim Patterson - Waste Management Specialist
LACKEY.WPD
1646 MAIL SERVICE CENTER, RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27699-1646
401 OBERLIN ROAD, SUITE 150, RALEIGH, NC 27605
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY / AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 50% RECYCLED/10% POST -CONSUMER PAPER

NC DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT, HEALTH AND NATURAL RESOURCES
Division of Solid Waste Management
Solid Waste Section
SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY EVALUATION REPORT
Type of Facility Permit / Cant)r t
t /-
Name of Facility ) L P 1,.{, } �% Location
Date of Last Evaluation
I. Permit Conditions Followed Yes No N/A
A. Specific Condition(s) Vi
II. Operational Requirements Followed Yes No
15A N-C. Admin. Code 13B Section
A. Specific Violation(s) by number and letter.
Fi t I t.
III. other Violations of Rule or Law
IV. Evaluators Comments IUi (`�1"7�' 11;.' r lf.r,
V. Continuation Page Required? Yes No Receiving SignatureiL LJrl1r- '"
Evaluation Date j �- % ' Solid Waste Section,
DEHNR 3793 (Part I White: Facility Part 11 Canary: Central Office Part III Pink: Regional Office)
Solid Waste Section (Review 7/94)

NC DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT, HEALTH AND NATURAL RESOURCES
i Division of Solid Waste Management
Solid Waste Section
SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY EVALUATION REPORT
I
! Type of Facility Permit # Canty
Name of Facility Location
! Date of Last Evaluation
I. Permit Conditions Followed Yes No N/A
A. Specific Condition(s) Violated
II. Operational Requirements Followed Yes No
15A N.C. Ac).in. Code 13B Section
A. Specific Violation(s) by number and letter.
III. Other Violations of Rule or Law
IV. Evaluator's Comments
V. ContirwAticn Page Required? Yes No Receiving Signature
Evaluation Date Solid Waste Section
DEHNR 3793 (Part I White: Facility Part II Canary: Central Office Part III Pink: Regional office)
Solid Waste Section (Review 7/94)

NC DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT, HEALTH AND NATURAL RESOURCES
Division of Solid Waste Management
Solid Waste Section
SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY EVALUATION REPORT
Type of Facility Permit County
Nameof Facility, Location
Date of Last Evaluation
I. Permit Conditions Followed Yes No N/A
A. Specific Condition(s) Viol
II. Operational Requirements Followed Yes No
15A N-C. Admin. Code 13B Section
A. Specific Violation(s) by number and letter.
III- Other Violations of Rule or Law
IV. Evaluator's Comments
V. Continuation Page Required? Yes No Receiving Si
Evaluation Date Solid Waste Section
DEHUR 3793 (Part I White: Faciiity Part II Canary: Central office Part III Pink: Regional office)
Solid Waste Section (Review 7/94)