0601_ROSCANS_1983

Weather Conditions N.C. DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES
DIVISION OF HEALTH SERVICES
Name of Site
Location
INSPECTION FORM FOR SANITARY LANDFILLS
Permit Number
County
Signature of Person(s) Receiving Report
SIR: An inspection of your land disposal site has been made this date and you are
notified of the violations, if any, marked below with a cross (X).
1. PLAN REQUIREMENTS 6. ACCESS
Site plan approved Attendant on duty
Construction plans approved Access controls
Plans being followed All weather road
2. SPREADING & COMPACTING Dust controlled
Waste restricted to the
smallest area practicable
Waste properly compacted
3. COVER REQUIREMENTS
Six inches daily cover
Two foot final cover
One foot intermediate cover
4. DRAINAGE CONTROLLED
On -site erosion
Off -site siltation
Erosion control devices
Seeding of completed areas
Temporary seeding
5. WATER PROTECTION
Off -site leaching
Waste placed in water
Surface water impounded
Monitoring wells installed
REMARKS:
DATE
NAME
7. BURNING
Evidence of burning
Fire control equipment available
8. SPECIAL WASTES
Spoiled food, animal carcasses,
abattoir waste, hatchery waste,
etc., covered immediately
9. UNAUTHORIZED WASTES ACCEPTED WITHOUT
WRITTEN PERMISSION
Type
10. VECTOR CONTROL
Effective control measures
11. MISCELLANEOUS
Blowing material controlled
Proper signs posted
Solid & Hazardous Waste Management Branch
DHS FORM 1709 (7/82)
Solid & Hazardous Waste Management Branch

Weather Conditions N.C. DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES
DIVISION OF HEALTH SERVICES
INSPECTION FORM FOR SANITARY LANDFILLS
Name of Site
Permit Number
County
Location Signature of Person(s) Receiving Report
SIR: An inspection of your land disposal site has been made this date and you are
notified of the violations, if any, marked below with a cross (X).
1. PLAN REQUIREMENTS 6. ACCESS
Site plan approved Attendant on duty
Construction plans approved Access controls
Plans being followed All weather road
2. SPREADING & COMPACTING Dust controlled
Waste restricted to the
smallest area practicable
Waste properly compacted
3. COVER REQUIREMENTS
Six inches daily cover
Two foot final cover
One foot intermediate cover
4. DRAINAGE CONTROLLED
On -site erosion
Off -site siltation
Erosion control devices
Seeding of completed areas
Temporary seeding
5. WATER PROTECTION
Off -site leaching
Waste placed in water
Surface water impounded
Monitoring wells installed
REMARKS:
7. BURNING
Evidence of burning
Fire control equipment available
8. SPECIAL WASTES
Spoiled food, animal carcasses,
abattoir waste, hatchery waste,
etc., covered immediately
9. UNAUTHORIZED WASTES ACCEPTED WITHOUT
WRITTEN PERMISSION
Type
10. VECTOR CONTROL
Effective control measures
11. MISCELLANEOUS
Blowing material controlled
Proper signs posted
DATE NAME
Solid & Hazardous Waste Management Branch
DHS FORM 1709 (7/82)
Solid & Hazardous Waste Management Branch

April 27, 1983 J,
APR 28.1983
Mr. J. M. Heaton, Chairman
Avery County Commissioners �G��4STE MA�RG
Avery County Courthouse '
Newland, North Carolina 28657
Re: Avery County Landfill
Dear Mr. Heaton:
On April 25, 1983, Mr. Bob Apple of the Department of Human Resources,
Don Holebrooks and I inspected the Avery County Landfill on Brushy Creek in
Avery County. Our inspection revealed the following measures need to be taken
to bring the site into compliance with the North Carolina Sedimentation
Po lution_Control Act of-1973:
1. Minor grading is needed on a section of the lower fill slope to
remove erosion gullies.
2. The slope around the perimeter of the fill area needs reseeding.
3. A sediment settling pit with appropriate diversions should be dug
near the State Road at the lower edge of the borrow area to trap sediment
before it leaves the site. This pit will probably need cleaning out
occasionally until the site is finished and provided with a ground cover.
Completion of the above measures and proper maintenance should be sufficient
to comply with the above -referenced Act.
The site will be inspected again or or about May 13, 1983. If you have
any questions, please contact either Richard Phillips or me at this office.
WHA:a
xc:
Mr. Charles Gardner, P.E.
Mr. Taylor Currin, P.E.
VBob Apple
0. W. Strickland
Sincerely,
William H. Allen
Asst. Regional Engineer
Asheville Regional Office Interchange Building, 159 Woodfin Street, P.O. Box 370, Asheville, N. C. 28802-0370;Telephone [phone]

DIVISION OF HEALTH SERVICES
W--ES-T-EIIN-R-EGIONAL-OFFICE
Building 3
[phone]
',Ir. Grover Wiseman
Mr. Robert Wiseman
Avery County Managers Office
Courthouse
Newland, NC 28657
Dear Mr. Wiseman:
Ronald H. Levine, M.D., M.P.H.
STATE HEALTH DIRECTOR
June 7, 1983
It is my responsibility to notify you that the Avery County landfill
located on Airport Road is operating in violation of North Carolina SOLID
WASTE T,WgAGEiIENT RULES. If a violation is recorded on two consecutive
quarterly inspections the operator shall be notified, in writing, of the
violation, what must be undertaken to correct the violation, and a compliance
schedule. If the violation is not corrected within the compliance schedule,
the Waste Management Specialist shall notify the Raleigh staff for appro-
priate relledial action < The Avery County landfill -is operatinginviolation
of the following sections of the W-kSTE 1,=GEMENT RULES:
.0505 Operational Requirements for Sanitary Landfills
(4) Solid waste shall be covered after each day of operation,
with a compacted layer of at least six inches of suitable cover or
as specified by the Division
(19) At the conclusion of each day of operation, all windblown
material resulting from the operation shall be collected and returned
to the area by the owner or operator.
As noted on May 24, 1983 during an inspection of the Avery County land-
fill in order to correct these violations the daily operation must be con-
ducted in such a fashion as to insure daily covering of waste. Additionally,
all paper must be routinely picked up.
The site will be reinspected on or about June 20, 1983 to insure the
site is in compliance.
Please contact me should you have any questions regarding this matter.
R ectfully,
Robert
Waste Management Specialist
RINIA/dgh
cc: Mr. Julian Foscue
James B Hunt, Jr Sarah T Morrow, M D, M PH
STATE OF NORTHCAROLIN.A /DEPARTMEr� O HUMAN RESOURCES
GOVERNOR SECRETARY
4K��

Weather Conditions N.C. DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES Permit Number
DIVISION OF HEALTH SERVICES
INSPECTION FORM FOR SANITARY LANDFILLS
Name of Site
County
Location
Signature of Person(s) Receiving Report
SIR: An inspection of your land disposal
site has been made this date and you are
notified of the violations, if any,
marked below with a cross (X).
1. PLAN REQUIREMENTS
6. ACCESS
Site plan approved
Attendant on duty
Construction plans approved
Access controls
Plans being followed
All weather road
7 CDDPAT\TTTl' f /NAMAl+rPTTTll
Dust controlled
Waste restricted to the
smallest area practicable
Waste properly compacted
3. COVER REQUIREMENTS
Six inches daily cover
Two foot final cover
One foot intermediate cover
4. DRAINAGE CONTROLLED
On -site erosion
Off -site siltation
Erosion control devices
Seeding of completed areas
Temporary seeding
5. WATER PROTECTION
Off -site leaching
Waste placed in water
Surface water impounded
Monitoring wells installed
REMARKS:
7. BURNING
Evidence of burning
Fire control equipment available
8. SPECIAL WASTES
Spoiled food, animal carcasses,
abattoir waste, hatchery waste,
etc., covered immediately
9. UNAUTHORIZED WASTES ACCEPTED WITHOUT
WRITTEN PERMISSION
Type
10. VECTOR CONTROL
Effective control measures
11. MISCELLANEOUS
Blowing material controlled
Proper signs posted
DATE NAME
Solid & Hazardous Waste Management Branch
DHS FORM 1709 (7/82)
Solid & Hazardous Waste Management Branch

4
M
B
Subsurface Investigation
own
Proposed Sanitary Landfill Site
Avery County, North Carolina
For
am
Mr. Jim D. Woodie
Municipal Engineering Serv. Co., PA
Post Office Box 97
Garner, North Carolina 27529
SB-3806

4
f Ezrcx ENGINEERSMeir Ass®cia es,
NSUInc.
COLTING
CIVIL ENGINEERING - �iTRUCTURAL ENGINEERING - GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING MATERIALS TESTING SERVICES
401 GLENWOOD AVE. . P. O. Box 12447 . RALEIGH, N. C. 27605
919/828.OSOI
'PP hr-iinr_y 11 _ 1983 -- -
Municipal*
Engineering Services Company, PA
Post Office Box 97
Garner, North Carolina 27529
Re: Subsurface Investigation
Proposed Sanitary Landfill Site
Avery County, North Carolina
SB-3806
Dear Mr. Woodie:
As you have requested, we have conducted a subsurface investigation,
consisting of a total of twelve (12) test borings and five (5) ground-
water probings at the proposed site for a sanitary landfill. All the
- - t-es-t borings-androundwater- probings were located in the -field by
our office staff with your approval.
Site Description
The proposed site is located on the west side of U. S. Highway 19E and
old U. S. Highway 19, approximately one half (1/2) mile northeast of the
Mitchel County line in Avery County, North Carolina. The site has been
described as a wooded area.
Drilling Procedure
The test
borings were drilled using an all terrain vehicle
mounted
drill, Mobile
model B-50. The test borings were advanced with
hydrau-
lically
rotated continuous flight six (6) inch hollow stem
augers. The
standard
general
penetration resistance of the undisturbed soil was
compliance with ASTM Standard D1586-67, at maximum
measured, in
intervals of
five (5)
feet.
The groundwater level was measured immediately after the drilling was
completed in each test hole, at twenty-four (24) hours, and at seven (7)
days from the date of drilling to establish a relative elevation of the
groundwater table at this location.
EzRA MEIR, P.E.
JAMEs C. Ko, P.E.
MORRIB L NAIM
JOHN S. BRITT

Mr. Jim D. Woodie
Page Two
February 11, 1983
Representative soil samples were obtained in the field and were tested
and Ulldlyzed in our laboratory. e recovered soil samples were visualiy
classified in accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System.
The test borings indicate a variable color, loose or soft to very dense
micaceous silt with fine sand beneath approximately twelve (12) inches
of topsoil down to the bottom of all the test borings. Weathered rock
fragments and small boulders were encountered at different elevations in
all the test borings except B-5 and B-8. Auger refusals were encountered
at approximately ten (10) feet and twelve and one half (12 1/2) feet
below the existing grade in test boring B-9 and test probing P-5 respectively.
The relative density of the top strata of the original soil is fairly
consistent and generally increases with the depth toward the dense
strata of the soil.
The groundwater recorded at different time intervals and more specific
- so_l--in-f-o-rma-tion are -shown on -the individual test boring -logs- of appendix
I. The groundwater encountered in the five (5) test probes is as follows:
WATER LEVEL WATER LEVEL WATER LEVEL
TEST PROBE DEPTH DRILLED, DATE @ TOD* @ 24 HRS. @ 7 DAYS
P-1
15.0
feet
(1/27/83)
NONE
NONE
NONE
P-2
15.0
feet
(1/27/83)
NONE
NONE
NONE
P-3
15.0
feet
(1/27/83)
NONE
NONE
NONE
P-4
15.0
feet
(1/27/83)
NONE
+8 ft.
+9 ft.
P-5
12.5
feet
(1/28/83)
NONE
NONE
NONE
*TOD indicates Time of Drilling
Field Testing
In -Place Permeability Test
A total of four (4) falling head, in -place permeability tests were
performed at approximately four (4) feet and nine (9) feet below the
existing grade of test boring B-11 and test probe P-5. The test holes

Mr. Jim D. Woodie
Page Three
February 11, 1983
hollow -stem aug-ers -from th _ _ - und=-sue - c -
down to the top of the test zone. The test zone was formed by driving a
two (2) inch 0. D. split spoon sampler into undisturbed soil below the
augers. Water was added to fully saturate the soil at the test zone and
then the falling water level in the augers was recorded at timed intervals.
The coefficient of the permeability is calculated by means of the following
equation:
k=A(4h/at) .* Cro1 hm,
as suggested by Terzaghi and Peck in "Soil Mechanics in Engineering
Practices", page 326. The results of these tests indicate that the
coefficient of permeability tested is of a magnitude of 10-4 cm/sec to
mom 10-5 cm/sec which generally describes the degree of permeability of
NJthese soils as low. See appendix II.
LaboratorOEM y Tests
Four (4)augered-sorl samples were obtained from test borings
B-8 and B-12-at approximately two (2) feet to eight (8) feet below the
existing grade and delivered to our laboratory where the following tests
were conducted.
1. Grain Size Analysis
Four (4) sieve analyses and four (4) hydrometer tests were con-
ducted in accordance with ASTM Standard D422-63 on the augered soil
samples obtained from the test borings B-2, B-4, B-8 and B-12. The
results of these tests indicate that the soil tested is generally
classified as micaceous silt and medium to fine sand. See appendix
III.
2. Atterberg Limits Test
Four (4) liquid limit tests were conducted in accordance with ASTM
Standard D423-66 and four (4) plastic limit tests and plasticity
indexes were conducted in accordance with ASTM'Standard D424-59 on
the augered soil samples obtained from test borings B-2, B-4, B-8
and B-12. The results of these tests indicate that the soils
tested are non -plastic soils with liquid limits ranging from 32 to
44. See appendix IV.

Mr. Jim D. Woodie
Page Four
February 11, 1983
Two (2) moisture density tests were conducted in accordance with
ASTM tan ar -78, method "A", on the augered soil samples
obtained from test borings B-4 and B-12. The results of these
tests indicate that the maximum dry density of the soils tested are
101.5 pcf and 98.0 pcf at an optimum moisture content of approximately
21.5% and 24.0% respectively. These soils are generally classified
as fine grained soil material and considered as suitable to be used
for compaction as cover material for a landfill. See appendix V.
us
4. Constant Head Permeability Test
so
isam
A total of four (4) constant head permeability tests (two (2) for
each void ratio and permeability relation curve) were conducted in
accordance with ASTM D2434-65 on the augered soil samples obtained
from test borings B-4 and B-12. The results of these tests indicate
A-
that the degree of permeability of the soil tested projected at ?0%
compactionin accord ance with ASTM Standard-D698-78 is 2-4 x 10
cm/sec and 3.5 x 10- cm/sec respectively. The projected degree of
WM
permeability of these soils is considered as low. See appendix VI.
Conclusions
Our field testing indicates that the subsurface soils at the proposed
site are basically uniform in most of the test borings. Groundwater was
not contacted in any of the test borings. Groundwater was encountered
at approximately eight (8) feet below the existing grade in test probe
P-4.
The in -place field permeability tests indicate the degree of permeability
of the soil tested is low in the orier of 10-5 cm/sec to 10-4 cm/sec and
reflect a fair to poor drainage characteristic.
The results of the laboratory tests indicate that the top stratum of the
soils at this location are generally classified as micaceous silts and
medium to fine sands. The projected degree of permeability at 90%
compaction in accordance with ASTM Standard D698-78 is low in the order
of 10 cm/sec. These soils are considered suitable to be used as a
cover material for the landfill cell, however, we advise that the com-
paction of these soils to be monitored closely due to the micaceous
and silty characteristics of these soils.
J

Mr. Jim D. Woodie
Page Five
February 11, 1983
Thep era -um —of theso-il encountered —can beexcavated—withregular
grading equipment. Special grading equipment may be required for the
dense soils (SO blows or greater/12") in the vicinity of these test
borings.
Our recommendations and evaluation as to the suitability of the Avery
County site to be used as a landfill site will be forwarded to you as
IPA
soon as you furnish us with the topographic map for the site.
Very truly yours,
EZR-A M ASS ATES, INC.
E i E.
•EA: am

�7
GENERAL CONDITIONS
-A field log was prepared for each boring by our field personnel.
The logs contain information concerning the boring -methods, samples
--
-attempted and recovered; --indications of the presence of various
materials such as coarse gravel, refusals of a boulder nature, etc.
-
and obsevation rof - - r. und-ground The copies are on f --e in
our office. The final logs in this report represent our inter-
pretation of the contents of the field logs and the results of the
laboratory examinations and testsoof the field samples. The lines
designating the interface between the different soil strata on the
test boring logs and on the soil profiles are determined by the inter-
polation and are therefore approximations. The transition between
the soil material may be abrupt or gradual. Only at the boring
locations should profiles be considered as reasonably accurate and
then only to the degree implied by the notes on the boring logs.
MW
The boring logs and related information depict subsurface conditions
only at these specific locations and at the particular time designated
on the logs. Soil conditions at other locations may differ from
conditions occuring at these boring locations. This report of necessity
summarized the information gathered in our investigation and our con-
clusions based upon that information. In preparing this report, this
office has acted upon the assumption that it will be called upon to
render any interpretation of the information contained in this report
that may_subsequently be required. This office expressly disclaims
any liability for damages (which may include but are not limited to'
claims, judgments, compromise settlements, or litigation expenses)
-
arising as a result of the information contained in this report unless
this office is notified immediately of any arrangement, contractual or
otherwise, whereby any other soil engineer or soil engineering testing
laboratory undertakes to render advise in connection with this report
or to implement plans, specifications or any construction activity.
based in whole or in part thereon and unless this office is allowed
to exercise direction and control over the activities of such other
engineer or laboratory. Should any major changes in time of construc-
tion or relocation of the structure at the site occur, please advise
our office for any supplementary soil information that might be ne-
cessary.
The representations set forth above are intended solely for the
a
use and benefit of the addressee of this investigation and not for
other parties with whom the undersigned has not dealt directly.
Representations and recommendations are designed to enhance the, sound-
ness and safety of construction anticipated on the soil tested and
therefore are not necessarily guaranteed to allow the most economic
or least costly modes of construction. The undersigned expressly
disclaims liability arising from the use to which information in this
investigation may be made by those not addressees hereof.

A
P
P
E
N
D
I
X
I
TEST
BORING
L
O
G S
t_
All

1916 Race St., Phila(iclphia, Pa. 19103
Standard Method for
PEIKETRATION TEST
ATTD SPLIT -BARREL SAMPLING
OF SOILS'
1. Scope 2.4 Accessory Equi n)enl-Labels,.3.4 Repeat this operation at intervals
1.1 This method describes a proced=e data sheets, sample jail, paraffin, and not longer than 5 ft (1.5 m) in homogene-
for using a split -barrel sampler to obtain other necessary supplies should accom- ous strata and at every change of strata.
cation purposes and other laboratory
3. Procedure
tests, and to obtain a measure of the
resistance of the soil to penetration of
3.1 Clear out the hole to sampling
the sampler.
elevation using .equipment that will en-
sure that the material to be sampled is
2. Apparatus
not disturbed by the operation. In sat-
2.1 Drilling Egtripn:erl-�r1y drilling
urated sands and silts withdraw the drill
equipment shall be acceptable that pro-
bit slowly to prevent loosening of the
Maintain
-
vides a reasonably clean bole before
soil around the bole. the water
insertion of the sampler to ensure that
level in the hole at or above ground water
the penetration test is performed on un-
level.
disturbed soil, and that will permit the
3.2 In no case shall a bottom-dis--
driving of the sampler to obtain the
charge bit be permitted. (Side-discbarge
sample and penetration record in . ac-
bits are permissible.) The process of
cordance with the procedure described in
jetting through an open -tube sampler
3. P-roceduxee T-o-avoid"-whips"- under --
and -then_ sampling when the desired_
-
the blows of the hammer, it is recom-
depth is reached shall not be permitted.
mended that the drill rod have a stiffness
Where casing is used, it may not be
equal to or greater than the A -rod. An
driven below sampling elevation. Record
"A" rod is a hollow drill rod or "steel"
any loss. of circulation or excess pressure
having an outside diameter of 18 in.
1n drilling fluid during advancing of holes.
or 41.2 mm and an inside diameter of
3.3 «rith the sampler resting on the
18 in. or 28.5 mm, through which the
bottom of the bole, drive the sampler
rotary motion of drilling is transferred
with blows from the 140-1b (63.5-kg)
from the drilling motor to the cutting
hammer failing 30 in. (0.76 m) until
bit. A stiffer drill rod is suggested for
either 18 in. (0.45 m) have been pene-
holes deeper than 50 ft (15 m). The bole
trated or 100 blows have been applied.
shall be limited in diameter to between
21 and 6 in. (57-2 and 152 mm)
2.2 Split-Barrcl Sampler-Tbe sam-
pler shall be constructed with tl;e dimen-
sions indicated in Fig. 1. The drive shoe
shall be of hardened steel and shall be
quired to effect each 6' in. (0.15 m) of
penetration *or fractions thereof. The
first 6 in. (0.15 m) is considered to be a
seating drive. The number of blows re-
quired for .the second and third 6 in.
(0.15 m) of penetration added is termed
the penetration resistance, N. If the
sampler is driven less than 18 in. (0.45
m), the penetration resistance is that for
the last 1 ft (0.30 m) of penetration (if
less than 1 ft (0.30 m) is penetrated, the
logs shall state the number of blows and
the fraction of 1 ft (0.30 m) penetrated).
3.6 Bring the sampler to the surface
and open. Describe carefully typical
samples of soils recovered as to romposi=
tion, structure, consistency, color, and
condition; then put into jars without
ramming. Seal them with wax or her-
metically seal to prevent evaporation
of the soil moisture. Affix labels to the
jar or make notations on the coN ers (or
both) bearing job designation, boring
number, sample number, depth penetra-
tion record, and length of recovery.
Protect samples against extreme tem-
perature change&
replaced or repaired when it becomes DRIVING SHOE
dented or distorted. The coupling bead SAMPLER NERD
Su" lLE
shall have four !-in. (12.7-mm) (mini- SEATING VENTS
ENTS
mum diameter) vent ports and shall SPLIT aGRREI lode)
contain a ball cbeck valve. If sizes other
than the 2-in. (50.8-mm) sampler are
permitted, the size shall be conspicuously
noted on all penetration records. _�' -}
2.3 Drive Might Assembly --The as- � 6- (m 0
..
sembly shall consist of a 140-lb (63.5-kg)' STEEL BALL COD, PREFERABLY
!- CLTED MITH a �•ATERIAL OF
weight, a driving head, and a guide SHOORE HARDNESS OF 30 TO ,O
MM permitting a free fall of 30 in. (0.76 m). 27- (-1,) (OPEN)
Special precautions shall be taken to Now t-S lit barrel may be 1
P M in. inside diameter provided it contains a liner of 16-gag
ensure that the energy of the falling wall thickness.
weight is not reduced by friction be- N- 2--more retainers in the driving shoe to prevent loss of sample are permitted.
tween the drive weight and the guides.
Nom-s 3-Tbe corners at A may be slightly rounded.

:1
I. Correlation of Penetration Resistance with Relative Density and Consistency
Number of
SANDS
Relative
SILTS & CLAYS
Number of
_ awsN - Consistency-
--- ------
- " '- - - y ioo-se -
- - - --0 - 2
-Very aft
4 - 10 Loose
3-4
Soft
u - n Med i urn
31 - 50 Dense
5-8
9 - 15
Medium
Stiff
Over 50 Very dense
16 - 30
Very stiff
31 - 50
Hard
Over 50
Very hard
II. Unified Soil Classification Symbols
GP- Poorly Graded Gravel ML- Low Liquid Limit Silt
GW- Well Graded Gravel MH - High Liquid Limit Silt
GM- Silty Gravel CL - Low Plasticity Inorganic Clays
-GC - Clayey Gravel CH- High Plasticity Inorganic Clays
- - - -- --- - -
- oor y ra ed-Sand OL - Low Plasticity Organic Clays and Silt
SW- Well Graded Sand OH - High Plasticity Organic Clays and Silt
SM - Silty Sand Pt - Peat and other High Organic Soils
SC- Clayey Sand
III. Legend
o 0 o sw oL
o
GP SM MH
GM o 0 o Sc CH
0 0
o °
GC ML OH
SP CL - �` Pt
"

UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION
SYSTEM
Moor Divisions
Group
IrymLoli
Typ"cal names
Laboratory clr- ificziir,n cntbrim
GW
1••e!1 b"tided s:avels, gravel -and
D6o ID7o/'
:-
mixtures, little or n finesO/
C ` renter then 4• C,- _ bet.+rrn 7 And 3
-u
Div--—,-060
Y
C O
v
_�__. --_•-__•--.�..�-
L Ol
r
GP
graded gravels, grave -
u
m -
J
sand mixtures, lime or no fines
Not meeting all oradatjon requirements for G W
V Q
_
v
_
>
�
rr
c
c o
GMSilty
dd
grzvels, gr2vel-sand silt
mixturesline
IC
"3
'ner"'Crc lim;u "Clow "A"'E
v o C' 0 • ,�
o;P.1. !� ;ban 4
••A••
n
o -
c-
?.N 0 0 d o
o
:.Jove line v..ih P.
A n< and 7 are -'a
-
"A'
p
n
GC C?ayey crzvEls, gravel -:.and' -clay
C �.a m n
'«
�rfne Qtos requiring C7
j `Z
mlxiures
A
e =
: i:E71i lrj 11 71111 cbJve
of dual s�•nbols
L
v Q
o �
line vinh P.1_ crEaier than 7
o-
`
d
N c
.sE11 rzded Sands, revell
SW S y
e
- p
D 2
so 1D;ol
p -
•�
e
-
C0
-nds, 14-0c or no fines
_
i =
Cu=—ourter than 6: C - bEivv�n t and 3
c
ti
1
Dio Dto�eo
m
c
A
g
t
N
-
c o
-_
cy
u
o
>
«
_` u
BP FoorJy oradE7-d Winds, Gravelly
+o
-
.
p e
-�
= nVs, li-1E or no fines
c
,^ o r ..
Not -!! c:zdzticn r.tiuiremew- for S%V
- -
c
u o
S
p
c
c
d
o L
Ijr.e or P.1_ lens zhzn 4
o=
I
=
S`.S
Silty songs, `=rdsill r ix:ures
a N v
- � u
_
_ h
u
c .- Ln
L.,m,zs pio::,ng ,n atc.`."1
l
r
z
o e
zone wish P.J.
N
_
j
= "
SC 1
Clayey _ands, �nd �
play .-:ix-
= � d o
� ._ c
--- - !:-::•
rEtci^n_ .se of c-_I!,
C; G
e5
�
�7
soli.
Q
`
- f
11
Q Q •p
N
LnE w::a Y.I. _ c-.c.• `.En 7
'
lr.c rccnic Si!:s znd very fine
fm
r,m
r.71
rock f1
"ar'ds, r our. Silty or clay-
o
eti• fine sands or clayey silts
sScht r'.as:icity
6-0
_
'
=
u 12
-� �
lnorccnic clays of low to me
diun
For c.zsi.:---=-r. of fore-_:z:rrr I 1
r``""
soils and inE f:z-=;ion of --:,rse- ;
c -
CL
�,lccicity, gravelly days,
50
!
cr'InEd soils.
t
Sandy cloys, silty cloys, IEan
-
c!eys
_�
::erberc r. c i-
_
j1.1 1ionS of
z
r-`_.r.n_ ;z cool 1 / 1
~=
V
OL
Orcanjc silts and orcznic silty
Gays of low p!ericity
40
xo
s-t -boll.
~ PI=0.i3 f 1
a
> 30
1 1 1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 ! 1 1 1
_
L
lr:drennjc silts, ,Cc CEOUS Or
- m
`:H dj¢:ome'ceous fine szndy or
O
-
__
! 1 j 1 1
1
-
soils, El�iic silts
o
-
InGrnlC c!zys of hi_=h rizs-
CH
(
1 i CL-
- E
N-
ticjty, fat clays
10
-
rn
7
-----------'-��
?
c
Q:
<"Lz
=01- 1
`
cz 'ic t!ays cf r-..Edj.,n to
OH
'
• 1 , --_
_ _
i_ plpSicity. Grcznic sil:5
01-
O
10
70 30 EJ 70 ..J =o
f
T u
LcU:�
_ _ «
PI r11 cnd
sz its
- G

TEST BORING LOG
EZRA MEIR ASSOCIATES, INC.
COMULTING ANGI CMM, RALrJGH, N. Q
.boring ,N
Report No._ SB. 3806
Date__ 2 / 1 / 8 3
DEPTH
PENETRATION BLOWS PER FT. WATER
W L.L. P.L. I.P.
SOIL OIL DESCRIPTION
EM LEVEL
0 10 20 30 40 60 90 100
1 0
TOPSOIL
ML-reddish tan slightly
3
(2+3
micaceous silt with trace
3.0
—
ML-reddish tan slightly _
micaceous silt, medium
I 1
+(+
2
7.0
-'
ML-SM-tan slightly micaceous
.
silt with fine sand, medium
Y
9+
(6+
)
112.0
ML-brown micaceous silt with
trace of fine sand, dense
i
1
(1-
1
)
a
17.0
ML-SM-tan micaceous silt
with fine sand, dense
2
(
5
7)
. i.
�22.0
SM-brown micaceous silt and
I
medium to fine sand with -rock
fragments, dense
_
231
3
2)
27.0
ML-SM-brown micaceous silt
with fine sand with rock
4fragments,
dense
30.
_
2
(
6
9)
Boring Terminated
a
*of fine sand, medium
7i - - - apparent change in density or apparent refusal
` MJndisturbed sample F-4
V: Water content, L. L.: Liquid Limit, P. L.: Plastic Limit, I. P.: Plasticity Index.
None None at 7 days.
�''6'ater Level --------
None 24
'enetration: Number of blows of 140 Ib. hammer falling 30" required to drive 2" O.D., 1.875 I.D. Sampler one foot.
ca7,i111,:..........................................................................................................................................................................................................

TEST BORING LOG
EZRA MEIR ASSOCIATES, INC.
CONSULT7NG NNGUMFIRS, RALZIGH, K. r—
BoringNo.-----------------_.._.
Report No.--.SB-3806
Date--- 2/l/83
FDr-
BLOWS PER FT. WATER
W L.L. P.L. I.P.
I.P.PENETRATION
BEM
SOIL
SOIL DESCRIPTION
EM LEVEL
40 60 so lop
. 1 0
TOPSOIL
W.—SM—recidish tan slightly
micaceous silt with fine sand,
soft
3.0
ML-SM-reddish tan slightly
micaceous silt with fine sand,-
2-12)
trace of weathered rock
fragments, medium
7.0 -
ML-SM-reddish brown slightly
-
micaceous silt with fine sand,
medium
U.
10--(
-2--1)
-
Small boulders
112 .0 -
-
ML-SM-brown micaceous silt
LL
with fine sand, medium
L
N
17.0 -
ML-SM-reddish tan slightly
-
micaceous silt with fine
sand, dense
1
-+115--2
22.0 -
-
YL-SM-reddish tan slightly
micaceous silt with fine
sand, dense
214(-0
4)
27.0
ML-SM-tan micaceous silt
with fine sand and rock
fragments, dense
I
212"
i-0
3)
Boring Terminated
M ' - - - apparent change in density or apparent refusal
uUndisturbed sample !--4
r,W: Water content, L. L.: Liquid Limit, P. L.: Plastic Limit, I. P.: Plasticity Index.
None .... � t__..1/4____ None at 7 days.
Water Level------ -a _---_..__hours
None - 24
'Penetration: Number of blows of 140 1b. hammer falling 30" required to drive 2" O.D., 1.375 I.D. Sampler one foot.
Casing: .... ......................... ..................................................... ................................ ................................................... ................. 1 .............

TEST BORING LOG
EZRA MEIR ASSOCIATES, INC.
MNSULTINQ ZSNGINKE38, RAIXIGH, K. a
xsonn$
Report No.__SB-3806 —.
Date_—__1 /=-B3_
DEPTH
PENETRATION ®LOWS PER FT. WATER
W L.L. P.L. I.P.
FEET
SOIL DESCRIPTION
ELY. LEVEL
0 10 20 40 60 100
96
J
1.
pp DD
ML-SM-re dishpan
I
and white
3+
+
-mlc-aceious Silt with an
medium
7.0
ML-SM-reddish tan, white and
black micaceous silt wih`fine—
to medium sand, medium
7
(6
9)
I
�12.0
—
-
SM-tan and black silty medium
n
to fine sand with weathered
rock fragments and trace of
2
(
0
30/5')
`
mica, dense
17.0
SM-tan and black micaceous
silt and fine sand, dense
small boulder from + 20 ft.
I
-
22.0
SM-tan, black and white
micaceous medium to fine
38+-(
6+2
)
sandy silt, dense
27.0
small boulder from + 25 f t .
—
SM-tan, black and white
micaceous medium to fine
sandy silt with weathered roc
'`
-r
12+(
6+1 z/I
fragments, very dense
35.0
�m
26+(
0+1
/1,,
Boring ierminatea
- - - - apparent change in density or apparent refusal
ki
WUndisturbed sample }..
agW: Water content, L. L.: Liquid Limit, P. L.: Plastic Limit, I. P.: Plasticity index.
MA
rVater LeveL___- None ........ at_ -__ hours None at 7 days.
None 24
penetration : Number of blows of 140 lb. hammer falling 30" required to drive 2" O.D., 1.875 I.D. Sampler one foot.
2gII1S................................................ ...................................................._................_..................................................................................

TEST BORING LOG
t RZRA MEIR A.SSOCIATES, INC.
CON'.IMTING YNGINSEP.3, RAI.T M N. Q
.boring r1o. - =-_ _.
SB-3806
Report
D[PT11
PENETRATION
BLOWS
PER
FT.
WATER
W
L.L.
P.L.
I.P.
FEET
SOIL [)ESCRIMOP1
ELY,
LEVEL
:.
0
10
30
40
TOPSOIL
1.
LAI
SM reddis tan white and
-blacs- rg t y m c ceous
silty medium to fine sand,
medium
-
— ---
-
3+1+3
7.0
x"
SM-reddish tan micaceous silt
(
and medium to fine sand, dens
I
8
(
-W
8
12.0
SM-reddish tan micaceous
silty fine to coarse sand,
dense
T
1
(
7
,)
17.0
SM-brown micaceous silty
medium to fine sand with
trace of rock fragments,
1
+(
8
1
)
dense
22.0
SM-grayish tan silty fine
7t
to medium sand, dense
_
20+(2
+25
27.0
-
SM-reddish tan and dark gray
J -
fine sandy silt, very dense
-'
35+(3)+20
'2")
32.0
SM-brown and gray micaceous
fine sandy silt with rock
Boring Terminated '
- - apparent change in density or apparent refusal
Undisturbed sample i
W: Water content, L. L.: Liquid Limit, P. L.: Plastic Limit, I. P.: Plasticity Index.
WIN
Water Level ---__None ---------- at -__-. --hours � None at 7 days.
None 24
Penetration: Number of blows of 140 Ib. hammer falling 30" required to drive 2" O.D., 1.875 I.D. Sampler one foot.
Casing•................................................................................................

TEST BORING LOG
EZRA HEIR ASSOCIATES, INC.
ooxsvi.;ruia rNGTN> rJM RA MGff, N. G
r
.DUI 111K 1-4
Report No._SB-3806
Date_--_-j-/-2.64.g —
PENETRATION BLOWS PER FT. WATER
W L.L. P.L. I.P.
DEnH
FEET
SOIL DESCRIPTION
EM LEVEL
0 10 !0 30 40 60 80 100
1.
TOPSQZL
SM-mottled reddish tan and
3+
7+
1
ty fine sanmedium
3.0
micaceous silty medium to
6.0
fine sand, medium
SM-reddish tan and light gray
micaceous silt and fine sand,
dense
C
9'
(
2
1
11.0
SM-yellowish tan micaceous
silt and fine sand, very
dense
.1
(
0
_0/4
1
2")
1
16.0
{SM-reddlsft
tan micaceous _
-
-
{i
silt and fine sand,' dense
1
+
(I
7
2
)
21.0
ML-SM-reddish tan micaceous
j
silt with fine sand, dense
'
'
26.0
-
ML-SM-reddish tan micaceous
silt with fine sand, dense
-:
1
(
g
1
i
31.0
SM-reddish tan and light gray
micaceous silt and fine sand,
very dense
2
(
9
1/3")
J2-1.5
nr�ns>_s�al�
i
- - - apparent change in density or apparent refusal
Undisturbed sample
Water content, L, L.: Liquid Limit, P. L.: Plastic Limit, I. P.: Plasticity Index.
ater Level.____NO11e-at�_....1L4___�_.___houra Y None at 7 days.
None 24
metration • Number of blows of 140 lb. hammer falling 30" required to drive 2" O.D., 1.375 I.D. Sampler one foot.
using :.............

"ULALIS ivu.
TEST BORING LOG s8-3806
EZRA HEIR ASSOCIATES, INC. Report No.___�.__.____ �.
CONSULTM(; YNGYN2 ERS, g A i NIGH, H. C. Date__,._1.426R5 _y
DEPTH PENETRATION BLOWS PER Fr. WATER W L."P.L.. I.P.
FEET SOIL DESCRIPTION EM LEVEL
o 10 30 30 40 " $0 100
ML-tan silt with quartz gravel{;
.. a-� FF + I ® 16+F11+131 I I I ( I _'.. ....
3.0
SM- ellowish tan silt and _
fine sand, trace of mica, 104-(. 7
medium , I +
7.0 --
- SM-yellowish tan anajligtit
gray sipt and fine to medium
sand with trace of weathered
rock fragments, dense
12.0
SM-reddish tan micaceous silt
and fine sand, dark
17.
20+ 32f18)
ML-SM-reddish tan micaceous
silt with fine sand and rock
fragments, medium 16 (6
22.0
SM-grayish tan silt and fine
sand with trace of mica,
dense
Q*17)
27.0 — -
ML-SM-tan micaceous silt
with fine sand, very dense
�(5 5 ")
i CO .
f
Boring Terminated
1
- - - apparent change in density or apparent refusal
^'-lndisturbed sample !
W: Water content, L L.: Liquid Limit, P. L.: Plastic Limit, I. P.: Plasticity Index,
ZL
tVatPr Level ?�_o
-at ....... at. ...... _-. 1./4___hour8 ,_. None at 7 days.
None 24
IR?enetration: Number of blows of 140 lb. hammer falling 30" required to drive 2" O.D., 1.375 I.D. Sampler one foot.
asing:......................................................................................................................_..................................................................................
b

TEST BORING LOG
EZRA MEIR ASSOCIATES, INC.
ODNIJULTING ENGINEERS. RALMIGIL N. C.
--a area.. _.._._. ---
Report No._SB-2806 —
Date-- 1/26/83
FTH
PENETRATION 13LOWS PER FT. WATER
W L.L. P.L. I.P.
fESOIL
ET
DESCRIPTION
EM LEVEL
0 10 10 30 40 80 100
C I
fo /0 fo
+let —
TOPSOIL
ML-reddish tan silt with trac(-
— —
q2P(3+4
01 1 S-and, medium
3.0 -
--
-
ML-SM-reddish tan silt with
fine to medium sand, medium
(5
4-6)
7.0 -
-
ML-SM-light gray micaceous
silt with fine sand medium
5+(5+5
if
12.0 -
-
ML-SM-grayish tan micaceous
silt with fine sand, medium
5
(T-8)
fa
17.0
-�M=Y-Cffl ow is i tan'si!Ey medium
to fine sand, dense
13-4
(15+--.0)
22.0
SM-light tan silty fine sand,
with weathered rock fragments
very dense
(5(
small boulders
27.0
SM-grayish tan silt and
medium to fine sand with tract,
of mica, dense
](+
2V42
30. G—
Boring Terminated
apparent change in density or apparent refusal
El?
1 Undisturbed sample Y---4
mW: I'Vater content, L L.: Liquid Limit, P. L.: Plastic Limit, I. P.: Plasticity Index.
1 'yvater Level ...... .. _None.__,t . ...... 1/ 4-___..__hours None at 7 days.
24
enetration: Number of blows of 140 1b. hammer falling 20" required to drive 2" O.D., 1.376 I.D. Sampler one foot.
................. ...................................................... ............. - .............................................................. ........................ ...............

TE 5T I3 ®R I Ind G LOG
G
.- EZRA MEIR ASSOCIATES, INC.
MN9ULTING rNGDMEM RA.IMGH, X. C.
- SB-3806
Repot
Date__ 1/26/83
t�-
DFi':H
PENETRATION BLOWS PER FT. WATER
Wr L.L. P.L. I.P.
FEET
r-
SOIL DESCRIPTION
ELV. LEVEL
0 10 !0 30 40 60 80 .100
fi PSOI
_
ML-reddish tan silt with trac
2+
2+2)
_00f
fine sand and organic
-
3.0
ML-SM-reddish tan silt with
+
e
fine sand, loosgong
7.0-
ML-SM-reddish tan silt with
fine sand, trace of mica,
8
(1
+
)
medium
r
12.1ML-SM-reddish
tan and light
'ago
gray micaceous silt with
fine sand, medium
13
(
4
13
4
1
(
2
7)
2 2 .
—
SM-reddish tan micaceous
ii
silt and fine sand, very
dense
z
33+(
C=2
/5
/ 2"
27.
ML-SM-tan micaceous silt with
fine sand, very dense
ter 30:
- - -
�-
19+ (
- - ")/
4 "
- -
j
Boring Terminated
-material, soft
- - - - apparent change in density or apparent refusal
tom_
1=°- Jndisturbed sample
-Water content, L. L.: Liquid Limit, P. L.: Plastic Limit, I. P.: Plasticity In --'ex.
T None 1/4 '=' None at 7 days.
� ater Level----------------...---at--------•-----------.__dioura �-
None 24
Penetration: Number of blows of 140 lb. hammer falling 30" required to drive 2" O.D., 1.375 I.D. sampler one foot.
Casing ...........................

TEST BORING LOG
EZRA HEIR ASSOCIATES, INC.
CONSULTING MIGWEPB3, BAIMGM, X. C.
SB 3806
Report .�7o._�------- -
Date-_212181
DiPfH
PENETRATION BLOWS PER FT. WATER
W L.L. P.L. I.P.
FEET
SOIL DESCRIPTION
PTION
ELV. LEVEL
�.
0 10 !0 30 40 60 $0 100
°Ip 9ro 9�
TOPSOIL- -
1.
+
2+3)
}` 3.
ilr,with fin
SM-grayish brown micaceous .
5
silt and medium to fine sand*
9+(5
/4
/2"
Boulders
10.0
Boring Terminated
I
*sand, soft
`*with rock fragments,
small boulders, very dense
Uj
- - - - apparent change in density or apparent refusal
-ndisturbed sample F
Water content, L. L.: Liquid Limit, P. L.: Plastic Limit, I. P.: Plasticity In =:ex.
zr None 1/4 None at 7 days.
r� ater Level-- --------- ...._.at_ - —-----�oura
None 24
jp enetration: Nurnber of blows of 140 lb. hammer falling 30" required to drive 2" O.D., 1.375 I.D. Sampler one foot.
Casing............................................. ...................... ............................... ._..................................................................................... ................

TEST BORING LOG
EZRA MEIR ASSOCIATES, INC.
: I I CONSULTING ICNGI1MER3, RALZIGH, X. Q.
boring
Report -"Ko._ SB_ 3806
Date_—_-__2!_211i3
DEPTH
PENETRATION SLOWS PER FT. WATER
W L.L. P.L.. I.P.
FED
SOIL DESCRIPTION
EM LEVEL
0 10 20 30 40 60 90 100
1.
+
micaceous silt with medium
3
Tom, —Lan mi Sit Wi1=11
8.}-
- -
-
-
trace of fine sand, medium
-
SM-brown micaceous silt and
medium to fine sand with
rock fragments, medium
(0
1
)
12.0
SM-tan micaceous silt and
I
medium to fine sand, medium
I
9
17.0
SM-tan micaceous silt and
fine sand, medium
12
(9
1))
22.0
1•L-SM-brown micaceous silt
with fine sand, medium
9+7+2
27.0
ML-SM-tan micaceous silt
with fine sand and weathered
rock fragments, medium
d
i
Boring Terminated
-to fine sand, medium
- - - apparent change in density or apparent refusal
, Undisturbed sample l
W: Water content, L. L.: Liquid Limit, P. L.: Plastic Limit, I. P.: Plasticity Ind_x.
"`Nater Level. -------- None ...... at— ........ h------- hours None at 7 days.
None 24
enetration: Number of blows of 140 Ib. hammer falling 30" required to drive 2" O.D., 1.375 I.D. S:=.mpler one foot.

f TEST BORING LOG
EZRA MEIR ASSOCIATES, INC.
CONSULTING ICNGDMYJLS, RA LMC;H. K. C.
Boring 1144a- "--- L1
SB-3806
Report
Date_ q;% 1 B 3
PENETRATION BLOWS PER FT. WATER
W L.L. P.L. I.P.
pEPrFI
FEET
SOIL OLSCRIPTION
ELV. LEVEL
10 on 30 40 " 'SO 100
90 96 go
TOPSOIL
_
.0
3+
2+2
tan qll,gbtly
micaceous silt with medium
3.0
- -
tsh tan slightly
micaceous silt with fine
11
(
1
1
sand, medium
7.0
r'
r,
/
SM-tan slightly micaceous
fine sand and silt, medium
9+
5+
)
12.0
i��
SM-ML-brown micaceous fine
,.-
sand and silt with weathered
rock fragments, dense
1
+
-
2
)
iA
SM-ML broom micaceous fine
17.0
sand and silt with weathered
rock fragments, very dense
19+(
2+--
/2"
i
2.0
'
AIL-SM-tan micaceous silt with
fine sand and rock fragments,
very dense
-
26+(
5+_
/1"
6.5
Boring Terminated
4A
't
z
^to fine sand, soft
- - - apparent change in density or apparent refusal
'ndisturbed sample 1- 4
i
: Water content, L. L.: Liquid Limit, P. L.: Plastic Limit, I. P.: Plasticity Index.
►'ater Level -__-_--None at_ -_11.4 •---.houra None at 7 days.
None 24
enetration: Number of blows of 140 lb. hammer falling 30" required to drive 2" O.D., 1.975 I.D. S,Tmpler one foot.
lasing

TEST BORING LOG
EZRA MEIR .AASSOCIATES, IIdC.
CONSULTING ENGINEER$. AA MGEL K. C.
Report ,vo.__SB-3806
Date___2L_1181 _ —
PENETRATION BLOWS PER FT. . WATER
W L.L. P.L. I.P.
DEPTH
SOIL DESCRIPTION
EM LEVEL
96 90 96
FEET
0 10 20 30 40 6o 80 1o0
TOPSOIL---
_---
-
--
1.0
ML- tan slightlymicaceous
2+(3
5)
silt with trace of fine
3.0
ML-SM-tan micaceous silt with
fine sand, medium
-1
I
8
(9
1
)
12.0
ML-SM-grayish tan micaceous
'a.
silt with fine sand and
weathered rock fragments,
1
(T+
2
medium
17.
-
- r- an micaceous si
with fine sand, medium
1
(+
2
22.0
ML-SM-brown micaceous silt
with fine sand, very dense
I
-
20+(
O+_`
/5")
t
29.5
24+(-5+__/3"),
Boring Terminated
`
^sand, medium
R
M.
- - - apparent change in density or apparent refusal
Indisturbed sample #y
'�' : Water content, L. L.: Liquid Limit, P. L.: Plastic Limit, I. P.: Plasticity
�w'ater Levei___.None at._._ ......... 1/4..-.hours- None at 7 days.
None 24
3enetration: Number of blows of 140 lb. hammer falling 30" required to drive 2" O.D., 1.375 I.D. `.ampler one foot.
C............._.........................................................................------......................

� . . .
R \
+ .
-
. . . . .
.. . APPENDIX ■!
\\ IN -PLACE PERMEABILITY TEST
}\^ (FALLING HEAD)
� g .
64
/»
�
� 7 .
��

CHKD. DY/7//14/ DATE -%33
EZRA MEIR ASSOCIATES, INC.
Consulting Engirunt
RALEIGH, N. G._ _
FIELD PERMEABILITY TEST
(Falling Head Method)
JOB NO.
PROJECT �� osf ,i, �9,� �,s�.uo�.�// DATE / -z8 -83 -
-_ L O--- - TES-TED-t-b,��
TEST HOLE N0. 111L-I S TEMPERATURE -so,,--'
LENGTH OF THE PORTION OF THE TEST HOLE L) Is
RADIUS OFTESTHOLE(R) D
GROUND WATER LEVEL lyoiVe-4r
STARTING WATER HEAD = WATERTABLE + WATERHEAD ABOVE GROUND
= O + Z, /' 3,S't D, 7S. Z. 33.3 /' /r.3, Dyc�
DEPTH OF TEST HOLE
FALLING TIME
(second)
FALLING HEIGHT
RE MAR i'�S
c
FROM
TO
3•S
S, D
/20 - 0 I
/.87� I
X= '!�3. -v"x
(
I
I
I
I
I �
I
I
I
(
I
1
I
i
I
i

LjT r r
GHKD. BYDATE=L-7
PROJECT /'20 oSEd
TEST HOLE
LENGTH OF THE PORTION OF THE TEST HOLE L
RADIUS OF TEST HOLE (R)
GROUND WATER LEVEL
EZRA MEIR ASSOCIATES, INC.
Consulting Engineers
- -. -- _ RALEIGK N. C-
FIELD PERMEABILITY TEST
(Falling Head Method)
DATE
-TE S TE D--BY
TEMPERATURE ,3o ,OF
JOB NO.-:5�3"3BOG
STARTING WATER HEAD = WATERTABLE + WATERHEAD ABOVE GROUND _
= O + 2.7 ` t 8,s't
DEPTH OF TEST HOLE
FALLING TIME
(second)
FALLING HEIGHT
(c� T.vc%s
REMARKS
G''7/=�`�•
FR OM
TO
Z .7190
i
I
I
I
(
1
f�
I
I -
i
I �I
i
I
I
f
I
I
I
I

EZRA MEIR ASSOCIATES, INC.
GHKD. BY DATE_ JOB NO. �/✓ -3�
CommIting Engineers
- - - BALEIGH, N. G
FIELD PERMEABILITY TEST
(Falling Head Method)
PR OJECT DATE
C)CAT-I0N D—BY ,--.
TEST HOLE N0. TEMPERATURE yS°F
LENGTH OF THE PORTION OF THE TEST HOLE L) /.S '
Kmulu-3 yr iLJ1 11VLL %n/ bu
GROUND WATER LEVEL NONE
STARTING WATER HEAD = WATERTABLE + WATERHEAD ABOVE GROUND
O + Z.o' + 3,s'f o,-75
DEPTH OF TEST HOLE
FALLING TIME
(second)
FALLING HEIGHT
( ii✓cH�S
REMARKS -.
cm/.�L
FR OM
TO
3.S
I SDI
IO,D - ZUO
/.7S `K=
1.8'y-/0
Z u0 _ N 80
A 3�S �
k = 9. 4,EX J 1) 's
7f3D - 13 8o
21"X� JO -,
I
I
I
1
I
I
I
I

GHKD. BY DATE_
1
ni-I
�GKA .�1r.1K AJSVt,:lA"1'�5� 1!1(:.
Conrullinp Engineers JOB NC., S/3
RALEIGH, N. G
FIELD PERMEABILITY TEST
(Falling Head Method)
PROJECTDATE-
TESTED BY -,r
TEST HOLE N0. -/ TEMPERATURE-ypo�
LENGTH OF THE PORTION OF THE TEST HOLE
- - ��
RAD IU TES=T--Fi`OtE R- - /,A-
GROUND WATER LEVEL ivOrVF
STARTING WATER HEAD = WATERTABLE + WATERHEAD ABOVE GROUND
+ 2.0
DEPTH OF TEST HOLE
FALLING TIME
(second)
FALLING HEIGHT
REMP-,RKS -
FR OM
TO
3; S
/0 , 0
O, O - z yo
IZ410
- 5'30
%S
-
- -
( 780 - /330
//. Z�. I
Z, /3 .r'11 - y
I
I i
I
I
41�
(
I
I
I
(
I
I
I
I
I
i
I
I
I
I
I
I
I I
I
I

APPENDIX
GRAIN SIZ-E A
(SIEVE ANALYSIS AND HYDROMETER TEST)

EZRA MEIR ASSOCIATES, INC.
By Date Z'%-83 Consulting 6ngtneers
CH K D b y Date Z' Q 3 rMMIRER A. S. C. s.
P. 0. BOX 1M7 - PHONE SZS-0801
RALEIGH, N. C. 27605
/Q i
Sheet No 7 - of g
Job No.
�✓/ %�acE p� �r/E.9�i/.E.�Er%erx,� �,r-�9��;Eiv�.
t
Sieve
No.
Opng. In
MM
Wt. Sieve + Soil
in G.
Wt. Sieve
in G.
Wt. Soil Ret.
in G.
, Ret.
Cum. %
Ret.
/ Finer
4
4.76o
677.0
/72
3, y
.3. �/
9,1/.6
10
2.000
593.00
iD16
Z,/
SS"
9416_
20
o.84o
420.80
Z/5-
113
9.
�2101Z
4o
o. 420
504.50
5610
//, Z
Z/ _/-D
79,0
60
0.250
476.90
7215
/S!7
3Ir- .. 7
�v3
100
o. 149
465, 70
73. %
SG. Z/
1-40
0_.-105
437.8
- -'39. G
7. 9
-F 3
200
0.074
341.2
26. S
5,3
e3�7 , G
Pan
416.8
l82
3(0,
0--
Total
4339.7
SD/.O
0 100 140 200
Sieve Size
MON
son Mw
ISM
mail
Me
SAC.-����-----� ���--•--����.----��a.�
- In
�
: �NUMMEW �--..- =a. omen �
----------- -- ---- —-----------
- - amp■ CC iEC—M
_CC_C�===WIN
Gra'.'et Sand I Silt l Clay
Sand: Clay:
Uniformity Coefficient Liquid Limit
Coefficient of Curvature _ Plasticity Index

EZRA MEIR ASSOCIATES, INC.
By_ j _Date Z-7-83 Consulting g'ngtneen
C H K D byEG�9 Da t e Z 8-83 MMMIRM A. a. C. a•
' P. O. BOX LM7 - PHONS ZZ8-W1
RALMG$ N. C. 27605
HYDROMETER ANALYSIS
Description of Sample:
Wt. Dry Soil +Dish
451-2,±, 3 -8 ` S/��%1 ���c5� Dish No. Tar(
%yr✓�/�i9.+��%i✓E /�E�vn� ��� Net wt . Dry Soil
Dispersing Agent N f O Specific Gravity
Amount 509 7/
Sheet No Z of 6
JOB NO.5�-38GYo
Date Z'7 83
Hydro -peter No. is/y
Meniscus Corr.
Z. Est. Det.
N G W 1000 x 1000% = Z , l07 (R -Rw)
s
N =% Finer than #ZO6 x N = 9f!S N D = 18.4 �'s Zr- cm
in m.
1D - --- - - - - -�`w - --mcn
DATE
TIME
Elap.
min)
R
1000(r-1)
Rw
1000(�-1
Temp.
oC
R-Rw
Zr
cm.
Z r
t
D
(mm)
N
zi.o
So
/7o
/lo.0
5/2•7
12•2
Z�lil
o.oi
qc),
zo,0
5.D
/70
15,0
y0. /
/Z.
12.11
0,0s-d
37,
//:13
Z
18.0
5.0
170
/3,p
31l7
/Z.
6. yS
,o3�-,
32-
/i- /&
5
16.0
5.d
170
//, 0
z?y
1 /3./
2.6 z
27.3
Z&
15
/5.0
SD
1719
/0,0
26. 7
i3, y
'0.023
D. Sq
0.013
Z5 Z
30
I ,O
5.0
/lo,s-
90
2410
/.3.Co
0.q8-
, 0 L-R (4
Z2.7
610
13, D
6 S
Z2.7
113,9
O, Z3
w
ZI.S
12o
il.s
S!S
70
/8.7
/y3
0.1Z
, co 5-d
1Z
3:1/
zyo
lo.s
y5'
/s,s
&,o
16,0,
�y,,s'
o,o(,
0.003
/.s
3 15
10,0
S!S
15,0
5.5
/y7
/yam
D.oyZ
!0,02301/3.
i
IZq5
9,0
5!S
/Jo
yS
12.0
/S.0
0.01Z
i
I'
1
E

EZRA MEIR ASSOCIATES, INC.
By Date Z-/-63 ConsultingSngineers
CHKD byE Date Z-Z- 3 E$ a S. c: IL
P. 0. BOB 22"7 - PHONE [phone]
RALEIGH, N. C. 27605
-z/�O51� 12"
/i7Lo�u� fp rin�E
Sheet No 3 of 9
Job
Sieve
No.
Opng. In
MM
Wt. Sieve + Soil
in G.
Wt. Sieve
in G.
Wt. Soil Ret.
in G.
a Ret.
Cum. %
Ret.
% Finer
4
4.76o
677.0
Z8. 6
S. 7
5� 7
9513
10
593.00
/ O
3,10
F3
9D. 7
F2.000
20
o.84o
420.80
ZZ, Z
4o
o.420
5o4.50
5%5.3
9/
Z2 8
772
60
0.250
476.90
S9.
//.9
3/7
�5.3
100
0. 149
465.70
�7S
iS S
7 -
2
S-S,9
S/.8
W,/
1-40
--0-.-105 —
- —
437.8
38,5
200
0.074
341.2
32,0
62 3
Pan
416.8
/6�5 g
377--
Total
4339.7
S00,S
4 10 20 40 60 100 140 200
Sieve Size i I I I ( I I 1
100 Diameter 1.0 MM 0.1 MM 0.01 MM 0.001 MM
90
8o
70
6o
50
4o
30
20
10
0
Gravel
Sand
Sand:
Uniformity Coefficient
Coefficient of Curvature
Silt
Clay:
Liquid Limit
Plasticity Index
10 littTe
20
some
35
50
35 some
20
little
10
trace
Clay

By,_;1, T _Date Z/_L4R3
CHKD byE,G�/DateZ-Z_8!?
EZRA MEIR ASSOCIATES, INC.
Consulting gngineers
MMMEH A. 8. C. E.
P. O. 13OX 12"7 - PHONE 8 -Ml
RALFAGK N. C. 276M
HYDROMETER ANALYSIS
Description of Sample:
_ Wt. Dry Soil +Dish
Dish No. Tar
Net wt . Dry Soil
� F,✓E 5.�.�a/ /
Dispersing Agent /i�fy(f D�) Specific Gravity
Amount • O 9r�,
N = � U R -R x 100%
C , c tJ 1 nnn
(R -Rw)
Sheet No--L—of
JOB NO. Si3-38�
Date Z' 1-93
Hydrometer No. �S�y
Meniscus Corr.
Est. De t .
D = 18A
in mZr cm
.
_ _j"s -rw tm-i-n -
Zr
cm.
Zr
t
D
( �)
N
yG 7
I!-9
z3.8
0.0/,7
uz.
S
SAS!/
12.2
12. Z
�.0�{
qo,o
3g 7
12.
�.35
D,03�(
3S• I
ID,DZ2
30.3
Z6,7
13.S
0.50
0.013
2y.2
"
22.7
13.q
D. q&
D,DD�,
7-0-(,
20.0
q,z
0. z
�.ax�
I
/7y
0- t z
is.6
"
1417
D. QSq
13. 3
10.7
15.2.
O. 01 Z
0.03.o
17

EZRA MEIR ASSOCIATES, INC.
BY / D a t e Z /- B3 C'onsulting gngtnsers
CHKD byf_G.� DateZ-Z-83 MRMBER A- S. C. g
P. O. BOX 1Z"7 - PHONE [phone]
RALEIGH, N. C. 27605
sieve Analysis
Sheet No ,$- of 8
Job No.�G� 3Boly
Sampl e o. escr i pt ion / �.s .9.✓ w, �,v
Sieve
No.
Opng. In
MM
Wt. Sieve + Soil
in G.
Wt. Sieve
in G.
Wt. Soil Ret,
in G.
o Ret.
Cum. %
Ret.
% Finer
4
4.760
677.0
O. 7
10
2.000
593.00
S S
I• Z
l• 3
1�5. %
20
o.84o
420.80
/Z.9
Z.6o
3.
96./
4o
o.420
5o4.5o
.30, /
lo, /
/D. O
90, O
60
0.250
476.90
4/7�e
�.9
/8. q
8/ /
100
o .149
-
-4 0 5 .� o -
S6, D -
//• -
3
L�
- -140-
-0. 105
437.8
38,0
- fo
38, /
-61,?
200
0.074
341.2
32,0
&. ;/
Pan
416.8
Z T79
SS. S
/00. 0
--
Total
4339.7
SOO.S
4 10 20 40 60 100 140 200
Sieve Size
100
90
8o
70
60
50
4o
30
20
10
0
Gravel
Sand
Sar.d:
Uniformity Coefficient
_=fic Tent of Curvature
Silt
Clay:
Liquid Limit
Plasticity Inc=_x
MM
10 Mc
itt?e
20
some
35
50
35 some
20
little
-- 10
trace
Clay
�y
�i D

EZRA MEIR ASSOCIATES, INC.
B y=_Date Z - /- 83 Consulting engineers
C H K D by E Da t e Z -Z -83 n�ER A. R. C. a.
P. O. BOX 1Z"7 - PHONE RMO"1
RALEIGH, N. C. 27605
DROMETER ANALYSIS
Description of Sample: Wt. Dry Soil + Dish
Dish No. Tar
-/w.i� /��✓E ���� Net wt . Dry Soil
Dispersing Agent f1�f O,� Specific Gravity
J�
Amount S. D giT1
N= G W R -R x 100'i s
N ='' Finer than #200 x N =
(R -Rw)
Sheet ',No to of _
JOB N-.. s�-3BOlo
Date Z-/-93
:Hydrometer No.
&z5) D 4, Meniscus Corr.
Z,IoS Fst. Det.
N D - 18�C Zr cm
in m. �.s- w t min
DAT
TIME
Elap.
mme)
R
1000(r-1)
Rw
1000(�-1
Temp.
oC
R-Rw
Zr
Cm'
Zr
t
D
(mm)
N'
Z-/
I -yD
y2
ZCo.O
5!s
Z0.0
Z,2-3
21,
0.0,3
ys
20,0
Z,/).0
53. y
// S/
-//
D oq�,
y 2
2
Z3. 0
41Y
20. 0
18.s`
11,7
,0-13
S
5!5
20,0
/70
y5.5/
// &
Z.3Z
D.OZ I
ss
15
20. S
S!s
Z0.0
/&,o
VZ.7
// 7
0.
6. or2
2 : I o
1 30
) 8.S
yS
/9_5
1 /5!0
57 y
i2 5/
0. 5�/
-.
Z ; 55
75
140
S!D
/9, 0
/Z S
53. y
/2.9
0, 22
%). DYS-
Ll
Igo
IS.o
�/o
/9.0
//,D
Z�Z/
/ .5/
0.D7�1
Z-Z
7:s5- 110135
//,0
S10
170
70
/8.
/
0.013
.P,2

q EZRA MEIR ASSOCIATES, INC.
By T Date 1'/ '83 Consulting Snglneen
CHK,D byf6 Date z_g g-3 MFnmER e, S. C. 8,
P. 0. BOX 12447 - rHONE 828-0801
RALEIGK N. C. 27605
Aa-
At
o-reve mna i ys rs
Sheet No % of� _
Job No.
i _ /=�-i7/��i ��_ ✓ .n .r1/--� � �e ��f�c%tides _ � _ _ _ �i
Sample No Description
i
Sieve
No,
Opng. In
MM
Wt. Sieve + Soil
in G.
Wt. Sieve
in G.
Wt, Soil Ret.
in G.
Y. Ret.
Cum. %
Ret.
% Fjer
4
4.76o
677.0
/D,g
Z•2
Z•Z
10
2.000
593•00
20
o . 84o
420.80
z
3, Z
7• 1
92
4o
o.420
504.50
,SO./
1 D.0
7(
62,
6o
0.250
476.90
62,7
12.5
Z t',6,
70, y
i oo
o. 149
465. 70
63. 3
1
3
577
14o
0.105
-
437.8
3 4/0
200
0.074
341.2
ZS. /
Pan
416.8
Z29 2
45•
100.0
_
Total
4339.7
SOO•D
4 10 20 4o 6o too 140 200
Sieve Size I I I I I I I
loo Diameter 1.0 MM 0.1 MM 0.01 MM 0.001 MM
90
80
70
6o
50
4o
30
20
10
0
Gravel ! Sand
Sand:
Uniformity Coefficient
Coefficient of Curvature
10 lithe
20
some
35
50
35 some
20
little
10
trace
Silt I Clay
Clay: 410
Liquid Limit
Plasticity it x A/-
_.

EZRA MEIR ASSOCIATES, INC.
13), C /,! Date 2- 7-83 Consulting gnglneers
C H K D by -'GA Da t e Z -8 -83 MEM13ER A. S. C. a
P. O. BOX 22"7 - PHONE 929-Ml
RALEIGK N. C. 27605
DROMETER ANALYSIS
Description of Sample: Wt. Dry Soil + Dish
% T,� Dish No. Tar
Net wt. Dry Soil
w� �Pa�Eo�9,2.4✓E�
Dispersing Agent AL(P//Ov1 Specific Gravity
Amount 5, 0 9 rr7
Sheet No--6_of '6
JOB +i0.-5A6-3806
GD.O
Z•6S
Date Z-7-e&
Hydrometer No.
Meniscus Corr.
Est. Det.
W 1000 x 100% = 2.1�% (R -Rw)
s
l
D = 18A Zr cm N =/ Finer than # x N = `l�• N
in m. r.—rw- t min
DATE
TIME
Emae
min)
R
1000(r-1)
Rw
1000(�-1
Temp.
oC
R-Rw
ZrZrp.
cm.
!
t
D
(m
N 1
/z
z5.0
S-,o
/7,o
zo,o
z
ZZ-y
0. 0(,2
S/.3
io:ys
1
Z�,o
5•0
�70
/9,0
D•
//S
//s
D, 0qF
y8.
z
zz.o
so
/70
/70
9
S 9�
.C)_
q3,6
�o:y9
5
zo.s-
so
/�/o
/ss
y.l
ir.9
Z•33
0,02a
39
/o:s9
15
18,s
S,o
/7.0
/2, 41
0.83
0.00
3q,(o
30
17.5
5".0
/6S
/2.S
33-41
12,
0. q 2
0, D7
32°
/i yy
(00
� � 5
s. v
/�. o
//.S
30.7
/2.9
0. z z0MA
29. S-
/Z;W
120
)q.o
1115
/50
95
zSy
/3.(o
o.11
0,00d
Z .
z : yy
240
13.5
yS
/S.o
9.0
210
/3.7
J. os7
0,X
23.
y: s�
370
12. o
yS
/S. o
�S
26.0
Z "8
7.5y
�270
11•S
5!�
/�/O
70
3

A P P E N D I X I V
ATTERBERG LIMITS

EZRA MEIR ASSOCIATES, INC.
B y !Date 2 - - Consulting Snglneers
C HKD by EGA Da t e Z - '83 MEMBER A. S. C. r.
P. O. BOX 12"7 . PHONE 8MMI
RALEIGK N. C. 27606
ATTERBERG LIMITS - - -
S heet No ofA_
>ob No.
Sample No. ,- 2&S3 'e' Description 1--/mil,�Eo�%i%.s�it��j�.�✓���%iE�D/�%�i�
�i',.vd w �.c'lf of � I•�JEA7%-�.PE.� .C�D�� �,R� /�",�itt� -
Plastic Limit: NON- PIAsTIC
Determination No.
1
2
Container No.+
Wt. Wet Soil + Cont. in g.
Wt. Dry Soil + Cont. in
Wt. Water in g.
Wt. Dry Soil in g.
Water Content in
LIQUID LIMIT:
Determination No.
1
2
3
4
5
Number of blows
q 8
3&
20
/Z
Container No.
gig
zo
Wt. Wet Soil + Cont. in g.
fZ'C4
12.1q
Wt. Dry Soil + Cont. in g.
0, l &
cj, 83
/C
5,13
Wt. Water in g.
2.qB
Z.ZG
Z,27
Wt. Cont. in g.
1.85
,ct7
/.7%
/• Boo
Wt. Dry Soil in g.
8„3�
79, ,
Water Content in /
C
c
c,
C
4-1
}
3
M nl.l !`IIn Vr
> iU 20 25 30 40 50
- /_
Plastic
Limit
Liquid
Limit
I
Plast'zity
Index
Toughness
Index
Flow
Index

EZRA MEIR ASSOCIATES, INC.
fa y e; �/ 'Date,?-4/ Consulting 8ngineen
C HKD by _Da t e z < . 3 n�sa & S. C. a
P. O. BOX IM7 - PHONE SM-0801
RALEIGM N. C. 27605
ATTERBERG LIMITS
Sample No. �"- -Z/9< Description
Plastic Limit: n/pN_/z)ZAST/,C
S neet No z of_�
.Iob No.
!! A ti S� ' �r✓ /s7i�A«'bus Ir"
Determination No.
1
2
Container No.
Wt. Wet Soil + Cont. in g.
I
iG
Wt. Dry Soil + Cont. in g.
f
Wt. Water in g.
--Wt. Cont. in. g.
-
-_
Wt. Dry Soil in g.
U'
Water Content in
LIQUID LIMIT:
Determination No.
1
2
3
4
5
Number of blows
w
3y
/
Container No.
gy
"W-2
30
%38
Wt. Wet Soil + Cont. in g.
1280
/3G3
/Z.jO
Wt. Dry Soil + Cont. in g.
/oS2
9, 73
9,1510
Wt. Water in g.
3,/�
3.19117'
Wt. Cont. in g.
1,83
1, F2
Wt. Dry Soil in g.
516gJ
781
0,
Water Content in % -
31a, %
35.3
y/�^
`�3•S
q4
q2.
�o
1 3!0
5 i 0 20 2 3o 4o 5o
`Plastic
Limit
Liquid
Limit
Plast=city
Index
Tough nes
Index
Elcq
Ince.x

EZRA MEIR ASSOCIATES, INC.
' B C',f� 'Date Z-/-83
y Consulting $ngineen
CHKD by,6,,c3 Date Z-Z-£{3 MEMBER A. S. C. a
P. O. BOB 12447 • PHONE 828-080i
RALEIGK N. C. 27605
Sheet No _3 f9_
J o b N o ..SB 38q�
ATTERB'ERGLIMITS- - - - -
Sample No. 15"8If 2V Description 1j/l 7 9Al'4 7/
_ r w�
Plastic Limit: 1A10A1
Determination No. 1 2
Container No.
Wt. Wet Soil + Cont, in g.
Wt. Dry Soil + Cont. in g.7AT
�i
Wt. Water in
Wt. Cont. in
Wt. Dry Soil in g
Water Content in
LIQUID LIMIT:
DEen,,tion No.
1
2 3
4
5
Nf blows
y2
3/ 2S1Cr
No.
8.30
201 /a0
831fWSoil
+ Cont. in g.
10,,3,3
A0,99 1478
/O.07
Woi 1 + Cont, in g.
78S
8 /9 8 0/
726,
Wt. Water in g.
2.'%8
2.90 Z.7?
Z.g/
Wt. Cont, in g.
I,83
/.g( 1.78
/•8l0
Wt. Dry Soil in g.
&,02
(o„ 3S 10 2?
S yd
Water Content in %
5//. Z
y3f y'
S"Z.d
FLOW CUR'9f
i
yy
9Z
e
5 10 20 25 30 40 Ya
Plastic
Licit
�Licuid
Limit
Plasticity
index
Toughness
Index
Flow
Index
Ilk

EZRA MEIR ASSOCIATES, INC.
$ y 'Date ZS -, 3 Consulting gngineen S h e e t No�_O f�_
CHKD by ZZ X Date Z- -8 MRMBEM A. S. C. a Job No. /3- 38oG
P. O. BOX 12G17 - PHONE 8MMI
RAIMME1, N. C. 27605
Sample No. /3•/Zez/ 7 Description
Plastic Limit:
,51% /�G AAI lel iS �j9Nq� CQfEDuS
Determination No, 1 2
Container No.
Wt. Wet Soil + Cont. in g, !
a
Wt. Dry Soil + Cont, in
IWt. Water in
Wt. Dry Soil in g.
Water Content in %
LIQUID LIMIT:
Determination No.
1
2
3
4
5
Number of blows
y9
3 /
zp
13
Container No.
8410
11Z
30
�3S
Wt. Wet Soil + Cont. in g.
//,/�
10,Be
Wt. Dry Soil + Cont, in g.
B.Coy
�.3C-
8.
7Sp
Wt, Water in. g.
2.4iT
Z-SZ
Z,7:5—
2-.53
Wt. Cont. in g.
/•80
/ 78
/, %�
I'S3
Wt. Dry Soil in g.
(0,89
�•S8
Water Content in %
33.3
/j3, 7
yy,�
FLOW CURVE
qq
q2
qo
38
3�0
S 10 20 25 30 40 5\
-._ o- Llows
Plastic
I LI.-nit
Liquid
Limit
Plasticity
Index
Tcughness
Index
Flc•,i
Index

A P P E N D I X V
:i 0 I S T U R E- D E N S I T Y T E S T
(STANDARD PROCTOR)

z
r Ezra Meir Associates, Inc.
JaCONSULTING ENGINEERS - Afrmi ? A. S. C. E.
CIVIL ENGINEERING . STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING • GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING • MATERIALS TESTING SERVICES
401 GLENk•OOD AVE.. P.O. Box 1244 - RALEIGm. 1\. C. 27605
919/828.0801
client: project:
e:
job number:
•
_ •
ILIUM
ILI
INS
7,�\i.
• - - • - • •
,__
i�iiiii►��\�
iiit•ii���i��
i�if•�iiii����i►
��f♦i��iiiii,
iiiiiiiiiiii����
iiiiiiiii�iii�ii��
iiiiiiiiiiiiiii7\�i•
^;Y-
i •
a
- • •
INS
w►�� i►
iiiii
No
i
W
iiiiiiiiiiiii\'.
ii
W
ice\
iiiiii
iiiii
iiiii�'�►�\
INS
M
iiii
iiiii
iiiiiiii
iii
���►��
�iiiiiiiit•��iil�i�`�7��
�i�■i�ii�iii�ii�ii����ii�as
MMIMMI
MINE
iIMMiiitl�i0iiii��oi.
iiiiiiiiitt�iiiiiiiii�l7►�!
miiiiiiiil�iiiii
iiiiiiiMP.5
iiiiiiiiiIMM
m
IMMEM
INS
iiiii■■MwuiiiiiMMIMMIMMKJMM
�.
IMMME
iiii
iiiiiiiiii
iiiiiiii�
iiIMMIMM
iiiiiiiii�iiiiii��C�.
_
■�ii��iiiiiiiiiiiiii111�iiiMMMM■AMIMMI
iiiIMMIMM
�r►"'�.
iiii
INS
iii�.
i�t•
iiiiiiii
iiiiiiiiii►��i7
iiiiiiii
iiiiiiii
a-ZIN
iiii�.
w
MOISTURE CONTENT - PER CENT OF DRY WEIGHT vv
MOISTURE METHOD MAX DRY OPTIMUM
DENSITY OF DENSITY I MOISTURE
PELAT!ON TEST PCF CONT.
1,67
I
SOIL DESCRIPTION
SUEMITTED EY: Z . L

a A Ezra Meir Assoeiates, Inc.
��E4CONSULTING ENGINEERS - .1IF31RE1{ A. S. C. E.
'1121CIVIL ENGINEERING - STRUCTURAL I?NGINFIili1NG - GFOTECHNICAL ENGINEM-ING .MATERIALS TESTING SERVICES
401 GLENWOOD AVE. - P. 0. BOY 1244 7 - RALEIGH, N. C. '27605
919/828.0801
client:
project:
"��
��
•
- •
'%=Zww�
��fifi���`IWIM
�►��
�ti���fi��fi���►
��r�fifi�fifi��fi.Vti
Mmmmmm►VOMM.
��r��������fi►��
����fi��r�����ta�fi.
fim=fit
•
•
_
����ri���ti�riri���������►_
ri����riri���fiti����ri�ri��
mmmmmm
r
===WIWAM
mmm��������ri�riri����.
�ri����ti�ri�ri��ri�a����ri�►��
HUMr����fi������fi��r
���������ri��ri�ri����ririr�����:�a►��.
�ris���ti��ri���=ririri��ri���riritfi��►
MILM
mm
MOISTURE CONTENT - PER CENT OF DRY WEIGHT
MOISTURE
METHOD
MAX DRY
OPTIMUM
DENSITY
RELATION
OF
TEST
DENSITY
PCF
MOISTURE
CONT. %
SOIL DESCR:=TION
71
SUBMITTED BY:

Ej
APPENDIX V 1
PERMEABILITY TEST
(CONSTANT HEAD)

1 Ezra Meir Associates, Inc.
,{� �, CONSULTING ENGINEERS — MEMBER A. S. C. E.
CIVIL ENGINEERING . STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING • GEOTECHNICAL
401 GLENWOOD AVE.. P. O. Box 12447 . RALEIGH, N. C. 27605
919/828.0801
June 17, 1983
ENGINEERING • MATERIALS TESTING SERVICES
Mr. Jim D . Woodie ,1UL 21 19S3
Municipal Engineering Services Company, P. A.
Post Office Box 97 L G'QGSWASTE MP��
Garner, North Carolina 27529
C
Re: Subsurface Invewtigation - Lu
Proposed Sanitary Landfill Site l'4 _-
Avery County, North Carolina
SB-2899
Dear Mr. Woodie: R-
Enclosed you will find four (4) copies of the soil profile that we have
completed for the subject project. The existing grade elevation at each
test boring is based on the contour shown on the site plan which we have
requested and was supplied by your office. Also, we are returning one
-(I)-copy-of--your-site-plan with -all the test -borings -and the test prob-ing - -
located as shown.
The groundwater encountered at elevation +2,928 in test probe P-4, should
be considered as localized perched water since no groundwater was en-
countered in any of the remaining test holes.
Based on the conclusions of our subsurface investigation report SB-2899,
dated February 11, 1983, we consider the site and the soil encountered in
the vicinity of the test borings to be suitable for a sanitary landfill
within the investigated depths.
The proposed sanitary landfill should be in complete compliance with the
rules and regulations of the North Carolina Department of Human Resources.
If we can be of any further assistance in this regard, please let us know.
Very trul yours,
EZRA M ASS A
E. i �E E.
Enclos re
EM:NH:sam
, INC.
CARP
s�
p''FESSIp IAL
SF
1907
� S ♦
•
EzRA MEIR, P.E. JAMES C. Ko, P.E. MoRRis L NAIM
JoHN S. BRITT

COUNTY OF AVERY
escription atta�ith Agreemen between Unimen Corporation n Dui
NOTE: The total site acreage of 6.02 acres is dedicated for use as a landfill
and the existing landfill, which this project encompasses, has a total acreage
of approximately 8.68 acres resulting in a total acreage of 14.70 acres.
2. Name of Operator -- Mr. Garfield Hughes, County Courthouse, Newland, North
Carolina 28657, telephone number [phone]. He will be required to main-
tain any and all required soil erosion control measures as a normal part of
his operation of the landfill. Mr. S. L. Ray, County Manager, is the responsible
agent -for --the Count--y—of-Avery.—His- address is—C_oun_ty—CDur-thouse, Nov land. North
Carolina 28657, telephone number [phone].
3. Future Use of Completed Landfill -- No specific use has been projected for the
ultimate utilization of the completed landfill area.
4. Landfill Life -- The projected life of this extension to the existing landfill
is 4.21 years. (Calculations attached.)
5. An area fill method will be used to reach the elevation shown on the cross
sections.
6. See attached calculations.
7. Seeding schedule.
8. Sedimentation Erosion Control Measures with calculations are attached.
9. This site is located so that access is controlled and no use of the landfill
will be allowed outside of the normal operating areas and operating hours.
Runoff from the site will be controlled as per the sedimentation erosion
control plan. This will keep siltation to a minimum in the adjoining stream.

Page 2
Storm water will be diverted from the operating areas to keep potential polluted
runoff to a minimum.
The site's operation and design are such that the potential for gound water
contamination is minimized. The work area will be kept to a minimum to keep the
infiltration of storm water minimized. Also, the cap on the completed dreds Will
be compacted, stabilized and drained to prevent the infiltration of storm water
through the filled material. With the aforementioned measures being taken, the
ground water will be well protected.
The required 50 foot buffer between work areas and property lines has been
adhered to in the design. There are no residences within the 500' radius limits
nor flowing streams on the site, though the centerline of Brushy Creek is a
property line on the southeast side of the property.

I of 3
AVERY COUNTY LANDFILL EXTENSION
SITE DRAINAGE DATA
-- - T=en year -tote d-ay—R-ai-nfa1-1 =-4 9" -
Soil Type "B", Steep Slopes -- 33% S.C.F. = 1.12 CN 65
Q10 = 11.5 CFS x 1.12 = 12.88, say 13 CFS/5 ac.
*All areas by Planimeter. (Scale 1" = 40')
I. DRAINAGE
AREAS:
Area
No.
A1:
10.64
sq.
in.
x 1600
SF/sq.
in.
= 17,024
S.F.
Area
No.
A 2 :
6.40
sq.
in.
x 1600
SF/sq.
in.
= 10,240
S.F.
Area
No.
A 3 :
13.52
sq.
in.
x 1600
SF/sq.
in.
= 21,632
S.F.
Area
No.
A 4 :
12.11
sq.
in.
x 1600
SF/sq.
in.
= 19,376
S.F.
Area
No.
A 5 :
18.04
sq.
in.
x 1600
SF/sq.
in.
= 28,864
S.F.
- -Area
No.
,:
27.72
sq.
- 44,352
S.F.
Area
No.
A 7 :
21.21
sq.
in. x 1600
SF/sq. in. =
33,936
S.F.
Area
No.
A8:
20.73
sq.
in. x 1600
SF/sq. in.
= 33,168
S.F.
Area
No.
A9:
17.87
sq.
in. x 1600
SF/sq. in.
= 28,592
S.F.
Area
No.
A10:
20.68
sq.
in. x 1600
SF/sq. in.
= 33,088
S.F.
II. DRAINAGE AREAS TO FILTER BASINS:
Due to the nature of the construction sequence of a landfill operation,
it would be most unusual if more than any two adjacent areas were denuded at
the same time.
Area A and A will be the first to be denuded in the Filter Basin No.
1 drainage area.
Area A10 and A will be the first to be denuded in the Filter Basin No.
2 area.

2 of 3
FILTER BASIN NO. 1:
- - 33 I3� E : +2-8, 592-5—F - _
= 62,528 S.F. to Filter Basin No. 1
62,528 S.F./24/3= 868 sq. ft.
Use ratio- of 2-:1 (width to—ent-h)
2x2 = 868 sqft.
x2 = 434
x = 20.83, say 21' length
42 width
SPILLWAY:
Al + A + A + A + A = 130,048 S.F./43,560 S.F./ac.
CN 65 Q50 Rainfall = 6", Slopes = 33%, S.C.F. 1.12
ES. 1027, P. 16 of 21
- Q50 for-5 acr_es = 1-6__CFS x 1.12 -- 18 CFS
(2.98 acres/5 acres)2/3 = (0.596)2/3 = 0.708
then: 18 CFS x 0.708 = 12.74, say 13 CFS
Spillway Size to be: 10' length with 0.8' of water over control
section, which is to be 1.0' below top of the Basin.
FILTER BASIN NO. 2:
Area = A10 + A = 33,088 S.F. + 33,168 S.F.
Area = 66,256 S.F.
then 66,256 SF/24/3' = 920 sq. ft.
Use ratio of 2:1 (width to length)
2x2 = 920 S.F.
x2 = 860 S.F.
x = 21.45, say 22' length
44' width

3 of 3
SPILLWAY: A + A + A + A + A10 = 140,224 S.F./43,560 S.F./ac.
Area = 3.22 acres
- - - - N 50 ain a1T = 6 Slopes = 33I, S.C.F.-
ES-1027,P16of21
450 for 5 acres = 16 CFS x 1.12 -- 18 CFS
�. 22 2/3
ace e 5 / 5dc.��sq/ 3 = j - 0.7
then 18 CFS x 0.746 = 13.43 -- 14 CFS
SPILLWAY SIZE TO BE: 10' length with 0.8' of water over control section,
which is to 1.0' below the top of the Basin.
III. DRAINAGE AREAS TO FILTER BASIN VIA DITCHES:
A. Diversion Ditch No. 1:
Maximum Flow at Filter Basin No. 1:
Area = 2.58 Ac., CN 65, Steep Slopes (33%), S.C.F. = 1.129
- Q10 = 11-.-5-CFS x 1.112 = 13 CFS/5-Ac. - -
(2.58/5.00)2/3 = (0.516)2/3 = 0.64
13.0 x 0.64 = 8.32_._CFS maximum Q1 via diversion ditch to Filter Basin #1.
*Use Jute Mat and rock check dams.
B. Diversion Ditch No. 2:
Area = 0.4 Ac.
Q10 for 5 acres = 13 CFS
(0.4/5)2/3 = (0.08)2/3 = 0.19
13 CFS x 0.19 = 2.47 CFS
C. Diversion Ditch No. 3:
Area = 0.40 Ac.
Q10 for 5 acres = 13 CFS
(0.40/5)2/3 = (0.08)2/3 = 0.19
13 CFS x 0.19 = 2.47 CFS
D. Diversion Ditch No. 4:
Area = 2.82 Ac.
Q10 for 5 acres = 13 CFS
(2.82/5)2/3 = (0.564)2/3 = 0.68
13 CFS x 0.68 = 8.84 CFS
*Use Jute Mat and Rock Check Dams.

l.) Chisel co-maac_ed areas ar.d spread topsoil 3 inches deep over adverse
soil conditions, if available.
3.) Remove all loose rock, roots, and other obstructions leaving surface
reasonably smooth and uniform.
4.) Amply agricultural lire, fertilizer, and superphosphate uniformly and
a.ix with soil (see below*) .
5.) Continue tillage until a well -pulverized, firm, reasonably uniform
seedbed is prepared 4 to 6 inches deep.
6.) Seed an a freshly prepared seedbed and cover seed lightly with seeding
ecuipme .t or cultipack after seeding.
7.) Mulch immediately after seeding and anchor mulch.
8.) Inspect all seeded areas and make necessary repairs or resee63ngs
wit—hin the planting season, if possible. 'If stand should be over
60% damaged, reestablish following original lime, fertilizer and
seeding rates.
9.) Consult Conservation Inspector on maintenance treatment and fertilization
after permanent cover is established.
* Apply: Agricultural Limestone - 2 Tons/Acre
Fertilizer - 10 - 10 - 10 Analysis at 800 - 1,000 lbs./Acre
Superphosphate - 500 lbs./Acre of 20% Analysis Superphosphate
!gulch - 2 Tons (Approx. 80 Bales) Small Grain Straw/Acre
Anchor - Tack with Liquid Asphalt at 400 gallons/Acre or Emisified
rt_ Asphalt at 300 gallons/Acre
..v

SEEDING SCHEDULE
-_ (REVISED:
.- 3:1)
DATE
spa
Planting Rate
Aug
15-Nov 1
Tallescue
300
lbs./acre
Nov
1-Mar 1
Tall Fescue
300
lbs./acre
"
& Abruzzi Rye
25
lbs./acre
Mar
1-Apr.15
Tall Fescue
300
lbs./acre
Apr
15-Jun 30
Hulled Common Bermudagrass
25
lbs./acre
Jul
I -Aug 15
Tall Fescue and
120
lbs./acre
*x*Browntop Rill`t
35
lbs./acre
***or Sorghum -Sudan Hybrids
30
lbs./acre
Slopes (3:1 to 2:1)
Mar 1-June 1 Sericea Lcspcdoza (scarified)
(Mar 1-Apr 15) Add Tall Fescue
(Mar 1-Jun 30) Or Add Weeping Lovegrass
-(Mar 1-Jun 30) Or Add -Hulled Common Bermudagrass
Jun 1-Sep 1 ***Tall Fescue and
***Browntop Millet
***or Sorghum -Sudan Hybrids
Sep 1-Mar 1 Sericea Lespedeza (unhulled-unscarified)
and Tall Fescue
(Nov �-Mar 1). Add Abruzzi Rye
50 lbs./acre
120 lbs.:/acre
10 lbs./acre
25 lbs./acre-
120 lbs./acre
35 lbs./acre
30 lbs./acre
70 lbs./acre
120 lbs./acre
25 lbs./acre
Consult Conservation Engineer or Soil Conservation service for additional in-
formation concerning other alternatives for vegetation of denuded areas. The above
vegetation rates are those which do well under local conditions; other seeding
rate combinations are possible.
***Temporary - Rested according to optimum season for desired permanent vegetation.
Do not allow temporary cover to grow over 12" in height before mowing, otherwise
fescue may be shaded out.
a

Chapter 1 OCTOBER 1972
- TAN-D-AR-D—AND-SPECI-FI-CATION-
FOR
RERi''�1 AN -EN T—&EE-D I-NA3 N-G-R A D E- D-D-E-V E-LO P_M-E N_T ARE AS
Definition
Seeding pei - ennial giasses and legurnes on eFitmeal areas for permanent cover
Purpose
To stabilize the soil; reduce damage from sediment and runoff to downstream areas, and improve
an area for safety and beauty.
Where Applicable
On sediment -producing, highly eroding or severely eroding areas where vegetation is difficult to
establish with normal planting methods; such as, construction sites, cut and fill slopes, borrow areas
and other areas denuded of vegetation where perennial vegetation is needed for long term protection.
Specifications Guide
A. Site Preparation
1. Install needed surface water control measures.
2. Grade and slope as feasible to use planned equipment for seeding, mulching and maintenance.
Slopes steeper than 3:1 are difficult to establish vegetation on and maintain with conventional
--- equipment
3. Chisel compacted areas and spread available topsoil 3" deep over adverse soil conditions as a
final operation in grading. Where conventional seeding equipment is to be used, rip the entire
area.
4. A minimum of grading and shaping is required when hydraulic seeding equipment is to be used.
5. Remove all loose rock, roots and other obstructions from the surface that will interfere with
establishment and maintenance of vegetation. Leave surface reasonably smooth and uniform
for final seedbed preparation.
6. Perform all cultural operations of land preparation and seeding on the general contour.
B. Lime, Fertilizer and Seedbed Preparation
1. When soil material is reasonably uniform, apply lime and fertilizer according to soil test report.
In the absence of a soil test apply lime as follows:
ti Tons / Ac. Lbs. / 1000 Sq. Ft.
Clay and Clay loams 3 135
Sandy Ioams, loams, silt loams 2 90
Loamy sands, sands 1 50
Agricultural lime used shall be within the specifications of the North Carolina Department of
Agriculture.
2. Rates and analysis of fertilizer if soil test not available:
a. Grasses alone - 800 to 1,000 pounds per acre (18-23 pounds / 1,000 sq. ft.) of a 1.1.1 ratio
such as a 10.10-10.
b. Legumes alone or grass and legume mixture — 800 to 1,000 pounds per acre (18.23 pounds /
1,000 sq. ft.) of a 1.2-2 ratio such as 5-10-10.
3. Phosphorous is essential for developing vigorous seeding root systems. If soil test is not available,
3

apply 500 to 800 pounds (12.18 pounds / 1,000 sq. ft.) per acre of 200% superphosphate or
equivalent in addition to fertilizer listed above or use an analysis to supply the additional
phosphorous.
4. When hydraulic seeding equipment is used, no seedbed preparation is required. Cut slopes and
r-p-acted areas -ray require-sc-ar-ific-ation. - - --
a. The fertilizer, seed and wood cellulose fiber mulch will be mixed with water and applied in
a-slurp"praa-d the-mi-x-ture-unifor-ml-y_over--the -area. _
b. The lime will be mixed with water and applied on top of the mulch or the lime may be
combined with the top dressing when grass is 2 to 4 inches tall.
5. When conventional equipment is used, the lime and fertilizer will be applied uniformly and
mixed with the soil during seedbed preparation.
a. On field conditions or slopes that are 3:1 or flatter, prepare a seedbed 4 inches deep,
excluding rock.
b. Continue tillage until a well pulverized, firm, reasonably uniform seedbed is prepared.
C. Seeding
Select species from attached table, considering plant adaption to desired use, site to be vegetated,
seeding dates and maintenance requirements. Seed used shall be labeled to show they are within
the requirements of the North Carolina Department of Agriculture as to purity, germination, and
presence of restricted or prohibited weeds. Erosion control plans or seeding contracts should list
species or mixtures to be used, planting dates, seed germination and purity that are acceptable.
1. Conventional seed — Seed on a freshly prepared, firm seedbed. Use equipment that will apply
seed uniformly such as cultipacker seeder, drill, or cyclone seeder. Cover seed lightly with seeding
equipment or cultipack after seeding.
2. Hydraulic seeding — Mix the fertilizer, Seed and wood cellulose fiber mulch with water and
apply the slurry uniformly over the area being treated. The slurry must be applied within one
hour after mixing the seed with fertilizer.
3. Use inoculant prepared specifically for any legume being seeded. Twice the recommended
rate will be used when seeded dry with conventional equipment and four times the recommended
rate when seeded with hydraulic equipment.
4. Mulching — Mulch all permanent seedings on critical areas immediately after seeding unless
sufficient mulch is present from previous temporary vegetation grown. Mulch is essential to
protect seedlings and area from erosion until plant cover is established. Refer to MULCHING
specifications for kinds, amounts and anchoring methods.
5. Irrigation — Supplementary irrigation will speed up the establishment of plant cover during
most seasons and may prevent failure of seedings not made at optimum planting date or seedings
on adverse site conditions. Where irrigation is used, water must be applied at a rate that will
not cause soil movement.
D. Treatment after seeding and maintenance is the most important controllable factor in retaining
an effective vegetative cover. The kind of grass or grass -legume, soil, weather and the level of
management one desires to give a seeding determine the fertilization needed after the first year.
1. Repairs — Inspect all seeded areas and make necessary repairs or reseedings within the planting
season, if possible. If stand should be over 601/o damaged, reestablish following original lime,
fertilizer and seeding recommendations.
2. Control weed growth during establishment mechanically and/or with herbicides. When chemicals
are used, follow current North Carolina Agricultural Experiment Station's weed control recom-
mendations and adhere strictly to instructions on the label.
4

3. LIME
Apply lime according to soil test recommendations for plants being grown. In the absence of
a soil test, apply lime from October to March every 4.5 years at rate of 2 tons per acre (100
4. FERTILIZER
Permanent seedings will be fertilized the next growing season after planting. For the warm
season plants, this .mould be early spring (bermuda, sericea, etc.); for the cool -season- n -
early fall or early spring (tall fescue, bluegrass, etc.)
�-ollow a regular fertilizer program based on sot
vege-
tative cover. The following fertilization guide is the minimum level that can be expected to
maintain land cover. For a quality turf that is mowed regularly, or is subject to heavy use and/
or irrigated, much higher fertilization rates will be required.
a. Stand is primarily Tall Fescue, Bluegrass, and mixtures of Tall Fescue -Red Fescue, and simi-
lar cool season plants. Apply 500 pounds per acre (12 pounds per 1,000 square feet) of
10-10-10, or its equivalent in early fall annually. Additional fertilization with nitrogen or a
complete fertilizer is needed in early spring.
To reduce incidence of leaf diseases, do not apply N on Fescue or Bluegrass from May to
mid August in hot humid area.
b. Stands of Bermuda, Bahia, Lovegrass and similar warm season grasses. Apply 500 pounds per
acre (12 pounds per 1,000 square feet) of 10-10-10 fertilizer or equivalent when the plants
start to green up in the spring. Topdress with 60-90 pounds of nitrogen per acre (1-2 pounds
per 1,000 square feet) during the growing season. When the higher rate is used, apply in
split applications.
C. Stands of Sericea Lespedeza, Crownvetch and similar legumes. Fertilize in early spring with
500 pounds of 0-10-20, (12 pounds 1,000 sq. ft.) of 5-10-10 or equivalent per acre every
2.4 years.
d. Mixtures of Sericea Lespedeza, Fescue, Lovegrass, or Bermudagrass. Fertilize in early spring
with 500 pounds per acre (12 pounds 1,000 sq. ft.) of 5-10-10 or equivalent every 2.3
years. In Fescue-Sericea Lespedeza mixture, apply in the fall if the Sericea Lespedeza is
developing better than the Fescue.
e. Fescue —White Clover, Bluegrass -White Clover and similar mixtures. Apply 500 pounds per
acre (12 pounds per 1,000 sq. ft.) of 0-20-20 or equivalent in early fall. An additional appli-
cation of nitrogen or complete fertilizer will be needed in the spring to keep plants lush and
in balance. Where grass is crowding out the clover, reduce or eliminate spring application of
nitrogen.
'4
5. MOWING
Mow Sericea Lespedeza, or Sericea grass mixtures only after frost or Sericea seed are mature.
Bluegrass should be mowed not closer than 2 inches and Tall Fescue not closer than 3 inches.
Mow Crownvetch only when necessary to control bushes. if mowing is done, it should not be
lower than 12 inches. Bahia and the bermudas may be mowed at any height desired.
Care should be taken not to damage the vegetation mechanically through use of improper
mowing equipment or by attempting to mow with heavy equipment on steep slopes when the
vegetation is lush and slippery or when the ground is soft enough to be rutted by mower or
tractor wheels.
Where mowing fails to control weeds satisfactorily, apply chemicals in accordance with current
North Carolina Agricultural Experiment Station's weed control recommendations and adhere
strictly to instructions on label.
5

CAUTION: Pesticides are dangerous. Use only as directed and heed all precautions on the con-
tainer label. Check the registration number and be sure that the directions for use include the
target pests. Drift from aerial spraying can contaminate nearby crops, lakes, and reservoirs. Im-
proper use and careless disposal of unused portions can lead to poisoning of humans, domestic
animals, desirable plants, pollinating insects, -fish, and -wildli-e-n--c-an-con- amina -water-
sup
-
6

Permanent Seedings
1
Plants and Mixtures Planting Rates Planting Dates Notes
- - Per -Acre 1. Coastal Plain
2. Piedmont
1 2/ -3. Mountains -3/
1 Wilmington Bahiagrass 40 — 50 Ibs 1 Mar- 15 — June 15 Adapted south of line —
2. April — May from Shelby, Greensboro
Elizabeth City, N.C.
2. Common Bermudagrass 8 — 12 lbs
(hulled)
3. Common Bermudagrass 15 — 20 lbs
(unhulled)
4. Crownvetch 15 — 20 lbs
1. April — July
2. Apr. 15 — June 30
3. May — June 15
1. Jan. — March
2. Jan. — March
3. Dec. — April
2. Aug. 20 — Sept. 20
Feb. 20 — Apr. 15
3. Mar. 15 — April
5. Crownvetch 10 — 20 lbs. 2. Aug. 20 — Sept.
Feb. 15 — Apr.
and 3. Mar. 15 — April
Bermuda Stands traffic,
does not tolerate shade.
In mountains keep under
2,000' elevation on well -
drained sunny sites. Refer
to specifications for SOD-
DING AND SPRIGGING.
Best in mountains, and
upper Piedmont. Requires
a pH of 6+ and maintenance
of lime,, P-&-K-every2
years. Slow to establish
with seed. Good plant on
slopes that will not be
mowed. Refer to specifi-
cations for VINES, SHRUBS,
AND TREES.
Tall Fescue 20 — 30 lbs.
Avoid wet sites — Mow
only to control brush.
Fescue used to increase
r'
land cover during establish
ment of Crownvetch.
6. Sericea Lespedeza 40 — 50 lbs.
1. March — June Lovegrass provides
(scarified) and
2. March 15 — June quick protective cover.
Weeping Lovegrass 4 — 5 lbs.
3. April — May
7. Sericea Lespedeza 40 — 50 lbs. 1. March — June Bermuda provides quick
(scarified) and 2. March 15 — June cover, spreads, and heals
Common Bermudagrass 6 — 8 lbs. 3. April — May in open areas. Bermuda -
grass usually disappears
where Sericea establishes
a canopy.
7

Plants and Mixtures
Planting Rates Planting Dates Notes
Per Acre 1. Coastal Plain
2-Piedmont - --
3. Mountains
8. Sericea Lespedeza 40-= 50 lbs. 1. March --April - Scarified=Sericea may -be -
(scarified) and 2. March - April spring seeded on Fescue
TA-I1Fescue 25 30 lbs. 3. April - May that was seeded the pre-
vious fall.
9. Sericea Lespedeza
(unscarified) and
Tall Fescue
50 - 60 lbs
25 - 30 lbs.
1. Dec. - Feb.
2. Nov. - Feb.
3. Nov. - March
If Sericea seed unavailable
at planting time, it maybe
overseeded on Fescue
later in the winter.
10. Sericea Lespedeza 60 - 70 lbs. 1. Sept. - Jan. Include summer annuals
(unhulled•unscarified) 2. Aug. - Jan. in early seedings only. If
Tall Fescue 20 - 30 lbs. 3. July - Feb. Sudan growth exceeds
Millet or Sudan 15 - 20 lbs. 10 inches mow.
11. Sericea Lespedeza 60 - 70 lbs.
(unhul led-unscarified)
_ Common Bermuda 10 lbs.
(unhulled)
Rye 25 lbs.
12. Tall Fescue
13. Tall Fescue
and ,,
White Clover
14. Tall Fescue
and
Red Fescue
40 - 60 lbs
30 - 50 lbs.
3-4lbs.
30 - 40 lbs.
20 - 30 lbs.
1. Sept. - Dec.
2. Aug. - Jan.
3. July - Feb.
1. Sept. - Nov.
Feb. - March
2. Aug. 15 - Oct. 15
Feb. 15 - May
3. July 15 - Sept.
March - May
1. Sept. - Nov.
Feb. - March
2. Aug. 15 - Oct.
Feb. 15 - Apr. 15
3. July 15 - Sept.
March & April
2. Aug. 20 - Oct. 10
Feb. 15 - Apr. 15
3. July 15 - Sept. 1
March & April
Not well suited to in-
fertile droughty, sandy
soils. Requires good
maintenance. Seeding
date in mountains varies
with elevation and aspect.
Good shade tolerance.
Double seeding rate for
lawn quality turf.
Can be used where regular
mowing is desired and
high level of maintenance
will be provided. Double
seeding rate for lawn
quality turf.
Red Fescue in this mix-
ture has a tendency to
fill in voids. It is shade
tolerant.
15. Tall Fescue 30 - 40 lbs. 2. Aug. 15 - Oct. Limited to fertile, Well-
and Feb. 15 - Apr. 15 drained soils in Northern
Bluegrass 20 - 30 lbs. 3. July 15 - Sept. Piedmont and Mountains.
March - April Shade tolerant.
8

Plants and Mixtures Planting Rates Planting Dates
Per Acre 1. Coastal Plain
2. Piedmont
- - - - -- --
- - - - 3. Mountains
1-6TTl! Fescue 60-lbs— 1.-Aug. — S-ept..
and 2. July 15 — August
Browntop Millet 35 lbs. 3. July — Aug. 15
or
Sorghum -Sudan Hybrids 30 lbs.
18. Reed Canarygrass 15 — 20 Ibs.
19. Weeping Lovegrass 4 — 5 lbs.
Notes
Keep annuals cut back
to 10-12 inches.
ing
ide
2".
2. Aug. 20 — Sept.
Excellent on berms, stream
Feb. 15 — April
banks and poorly drained
3. March — July
sites. Do not use on small
streams with low velocity.
1. March — June
Gives quick summer
2. April — June
cover — well adapted to
3. May — June
droughty sites — best in
mixtures with Sericea
Lespedeza. Tends to be-
come clumpy with age.
1/ There will be conditions and interest that will warrant the use of other plants or mixtures not listed
in the above table. Their use should be evaluated for each site.
2/ Some rules of thumb for conversions:
Lbs. / Ac. x .023 3 Lbs / 1,000 sq. ft.
Sq. Ft. of area x .000023:= Acres (valid up to 10 acres)
3/ Seeding dates within the geographic area will vary by season, temperature and rainfall
'�—)
9

Chapter 2 OCTOBER 1972
ANDARD AND -SPECIFICATION - -
FOR
- T=EMRO-R=A=R-Y COVER FO-R CONSTRUCTION SIT S
-
Definition
Stabilizing construction sites and severely eroded areas by planting annual grasses or smaii grains.
Purpose
To provide short-term cover for the control of surface runoff and erosion to reduce damages from
sediment to downstream areas until permanent vegetation or other stabilization measures can be
established.
Where Applicable
On any sediment -producing, bare or denuded area which may be subject to erosion and where temporary
vegetation can be used to retard erosion for periods from two (2) to twelve (12) months.
The temporary measures should be coordinated with the permanent measures planned to assure eco-
nomical and effective control.
Specifications Guide
A. Site Preparation
1._ Install needed erosion control practices, either temporary or permanent, such as dikes, ditches,
diversions, drains, contour ripping and desilting basins.
2. Grade as needed to permit the use of planned seeding equipment. Shaping may not be required if
hand seeding or hydraulic seeding equipment is to be used.
B. Seedbed Preparation
1. Chisel or loosen compacted areas. Spread available topsoil over unfavorable soil conditions for
successful establishment of plants.
2. When hydraulic seeder is to be used, seedbed preparation is not required.
3. When conventional seeding is to be done, no preparation is required if the soil material is loose
and has not been sealed by rainfall. On smooth undisturbed cut slopes, the surface will require
pitting, trenching or scarifying to provide a place for seed to lodge and germinate.
C. Lime and Fertilizer
1. Lime is�not required for temporary cover on most sites.
r;
2. The majority of sites will require fertilization to establish effective cover quickly. In the absence
of a soil test, apply 10-10-10 fertilizer or equivalent at the rate of 400 to 700 pounds per acre
(10-16 pounds per 1,000 sq. ft.).
3. On reasonably fertile topsoil such as formerly cultivated fields, fertilizer may not be required at
time of planting but topdressed after plants are growing.
4. Work in lime and fertilizer to a depth of 3-4 inches using any suitable equipment for conventional
seeding.
5. Topdress with 30-50 pounds of N 30-60 days after planting if needed to increase plant growth and
cover.
D. Planting
1. Select species suitable to the area and season of the year from Table 1.
10

2. Apply seed uniformly by broadcasting with a cyclone seeder, close drilling or cultipacker seeder.
Normal depths for covering seed range from ''/A" for ryegrass to 1 inch for small grain. Firm the
soil after planting with a cultipacker or suitable equipment except where seed is applied with a
--hydraulic applicator.
--
3. When a hydraulic seeder is used, the seed and fertilizer are mixed in a slurry and applied in one
operation. The see must -not -remain in the slurry with fertilizer -for -mare -than one-hou-
4 TAR LF t SaPriPs or mixtures an(-i seed6na rates for temporary seedingst
0-1
Planf;Suifability For
Seeding Rate
Pounds Per3
,,
,
Late Winter -Spring
�.
E R o
Acre 1,000 sq. ft.
(Feb. to May) i
v,
_j
U
C°n 3 a o
■
x
x
x
x
■
x
x
x
l
x
Spring Oats
95-125
3
x
x
x
x
Small grain
80-110
2
and
Annual Lespedeza
25
'/2
x
x
Summer
(May to Aug. 15)
Sudan or Sorghum hybrids
40-50
1
x
x
x
Millet (Brown top)
40
1
x
x
Weeping Lovegrass2
4-6
0.2
x
x
x
Late Summer -Late Fall
(Aug. 15 to Nov.)
Milk
x
x
x
x
In
x
x
x
x
Oats (Before Oct. 1 in Piedmont)
95.125
2'/2
x
x
x
Wheat (After Oct. 1 in Piedmont)
100-180
3
x
x
Small grain
75-135
2
and
It
t
(Determine and use local seeding dates. To provide cover during winter, seedings must be made in time
to produce needed growth before cold weather. Seedings not made at optimum time may be successful
if mulching and/or irrigation are used.
2A warm season perennial with strong seedling vigor. Due to its wide adaption, it may be used for
temporary cover.
3Unusual site conditions may require heavier seeding rates.
11

E. Mulching
1. Temporary vegetation is normally established without using vegetative mulch except on very
severe conditions such as steep slopes. On unscarified areas or cut slopes, a minimum of 500
pounds of wood cellulose fiber mulch should be mixed in the slurry when seeding with
-hydraulic equipment. --
2. Mulching without temporary seeding may provide and should be considered for short-term
ec ior1.
F. Irrigation
i. irrigation will speed up germination of seed and establishment of cover. Water must be applied
at a rate that will not cause runoff and erosion. Normally .25 inches per hour is the maximum
rate on construction sites. Thoroughly wet the soil to a depth that will ensure germination of the
seed. A second application should be made when needed.
12

Chapter 3 OCTOBER 1972
-- - - -_ S-T-IINN-DAR-D AND-SP€CIFICATION -- - ---
FO R - - - -
FSTAaL_LSH-I_NG_P__ERMANENT VEGETATION OR PROVIDING TEMPORARY -
PROTECTION WITHOUT SEEDING
Applying plant residues or other materials to erosive or sediment producing sites.
Purpose
To protect cleared, graded or other soil surfaces from erosion and to reduce runoff and sediment
damage downstream; prevent surface compaction or crusting; conserve moisture; modify soil tem-
perature; and help establish plant cover.
Where Applicable
On any areas subject to erosion. (a) The practice may be used alone where the season or other con-
ditions are not suitable for growing an erosion -resistant cover. (b) Where stabilization is needed for
a short period until more suitable protection can be applied. (c) As an integral part of establishing
vegetation.
A. Mulching for temporary erosion control without seeding.
1. Provide surface water control and for removal of subsurface water as needed.
--- - - ---2.- Select mulch material- and -anchoring -method.
3. Subsequent earth moving or seeding plans will determine if seedbed preparation, liming and
_.� fertilizing are feasible at this stage. Grade, slope or smooth the site to permit the use of planned
mulch on equipment to be used for applying and anchoring. Compacted soil should be loosened
to a depth of 3 inches if mulch anchoring tool or disk is to be used to anchor mulch.
B. Refer to Item B and C that follow for mulch materials and anchoring methods.
13

a
MULCH MATERIALS
Organic APPLICATION RATES
Materials Quality Per 1000 sq. ft. Per Acre NOTES
a. Small grain Undamaged, air 75-100 lbs. 1'/2 - 2 tons Spread uni orm y — ap-
straw or tame dry threshed proximately '/a ground
hay. straw free of un _ - should-be�srb e to avoi --
desirable weed smothering seedling. An -
cation or immediately
after placement to avoid
loss by wind or water.
Straw anchored in place
is excellent on permanent
seedings.
b. Corn stalks
air dried, 140-230 lbs.
3-5 tons Effective erosion control
chopped or
shredded into
if uniformly spread. Rela-
shredded.
8" to 12"
tively slow to decompose.
lengths.
Resistant to wind blowing.
c. Wood
Burred wood
A commercial product
excelsior
fibers approxi- 70-90 lbs.
1'/2 - 2 tons packaged in 80-90 lbs. bales.
mately 4" long.
Apply with power equip-
ment. Tie down usually
not required. Decomposes
slowly.
d. Wood
Air dry, nontoxic 12 lbs.
500 lbs.
When followed with straw
Cellulose
with no growth
mulch applied at rate of
Fiber
inhibiting factors.
1Yz to 2 tons per acre.
25-35
1000 -
On steep slopes or all sites
1500 lbs.
if only this mulch used.
Must be applied with hy-
draulic seeder
e. Compost or
Shredded, free of 300-450 lbs.
6-10 tons
Excellent around shrubs.
manure
clumps or excessive
Strawy manure more ef-
coarse material.
fective for erosion control.
May create problems with
weeds.
f. Wood chips Air dried, free 400.700 lbs.
8-15 tons Apply 2-7" deep. Most ef-
and bark from objection-
fective as mulch around
able coarse
ornamentals, etc. Resistant
material.
to wind blowing. May re-
quire anchoring with net-
ting to prevent washing or
floating off. May require N
topdressing to alleviate de-
ficiency while decaying.
14

MULCH MATERIALS (CONT.)
Organic
APPLICATION RATES
_
- - -- ---- Materials -
Quality
Per 1000 sq. ft. Per Acre
NOTES - -
g—.Savvdus�Free•=
from -objec=
8&500-cu.-ft. — — ---
Apply —1-7" dee-p-. More _
tionable coarse
commonly used as a mulch
material.
around ornamentals and
nursery stock. Use deeper
application for weed con-
trol. Requires anchoring
on slopes. Tends to crust
and shed water. Requires
25-35 lbs. of N, topdressing
per ton to prevent N de-
ficiency while decaying.
Weight of sawdust 18-25
lbs. per cu. ft.
h. Pine Straw
Air dry. Free of
50-90 lbs. 1-2 tons
Excellent around plantings.
coarse objection-
Resistant to wind blowing.
able material.
Decomposes slowly.
OTHER MULCH MATERIALS
Other Mulch
APPLICATION RATES
Materials
Quality
Per 1000 sq. ft.
Per Acre NOTES
a. Asphalt
Slow setting
14-28 gal.
800-1200 Use as a film on soil sur-
Emulsion
SS-1
gal. face for temporary pro-
tection without seeding.
Requires special equip-
ment to apply.
b. Gravel or
9 cu. yards
Apply 3" deep as a mulch around woody
Crushed Slone
plants. May be used on seeded areas sub-
ject to foot traffic. (Approximate wt. -
1 ton per cu. yd.)
c. Wood
Blanket of
Sq. yds.
Use without additional mulch. Tie down
Excelsior
Excelsior fibers
needed
as specified by manufacturer
Mats
with a net backing
on one side.
d. Jute, Mesh
Woven jute
Sq. yds.
Use without additional mulch. Will with -
or net
yarn with 3/4"
stand flowing water in waterways and
openings
ditches when properly installed. Tie down
as specified by mfgr.
kf
15

OTHER MULCH MATERIALS (CONT.)
Organic APPLICATION RATES
Materials Quality Per 1000 sq. ft. Per Acre NOTES
e. Plastic 2-4 mils Polyethylene film may be used to provide temporary cover
_for -banks, fills -or stock -piled -material —Use black for weed
control and conserve moisture around plantings; use white
for seeding establishment. Remove plastic after seeding is up.
C.
MULCH ANCHORING GUIDE
Anchoring Method
Or Tie Down
Mulch Material
Material
To Be Anchored Notes On Application
1. Mechanical
Small grain straw, Apply with asphalt applicator on power mulch
a. Asphalt Tie-
hay, shredded corn blower or other suitable equipment. Use liquid
Down
stalks, compost asphalt (thinned with kerosene) during freezing
weather, rapid curing or medium curing. Application
rate / ton of straw 200 gal. Use Emulsified asphalt- -
(thinned with water) when temperature is above
freezing, rapid curing, medium curing or slow setting.
Approximately 150 gal / ton of straw.
b. Mulch anchoring
Straw or hay, Pull over mulch. When disk is used, set straight.
tool or disk
pine straw Do not cut up straw. Mulch material should be
pressed into soil about 3 inches. Operate equipment
across the slope.
c. Pick chain
Straw or hay Use on slopes steeper than 3:1. Pull across slope.
(chain harrow)
d. Other materials
Other commercial products are being tested and
,at
are coming on the market. Apply with hydraulic
seeder or power mulcher.
2. Manual
Straw hay, wood Staple light weight plastic, paper, textile or jute
a. Mulch netting
chips and bark, nettings to soil surface according to manufacturer's
pine straw, compost specifications.
b. Peg and twine
Straw or hay After mulching, drive wooden pegs (approx. 8-10"
long) within 3 inches of the soil surface every 3 to
4 feet in all directions. Stretch twine in a crisscross
and square pattern. Secure twine at each peg with
two or more turns. Pegs may now be driven closer
to soil surface if desired.
16

' Ronald H. Levine, M.D., M.B.H,
STATE HEALTH DIRECTOR
DIVISION OF HEALTH SERVICES
P.O. Box 2091
July-g, 1983 --
Rt. 2, Box 18A
Banner Elk, NC 28604
Re: Disposal of 40-60 Pounds of Asbestos at Avery County Landfill
Dear Mr. Jackson:
The Division of Health Services has no objection to disposal of asbestos waste
in permitted sanitary landfills if performed in accordance with 40 CFR Part 61.
The following procedures should be followed:
1. Permission from the owner/operator of the landfill should be
obtained prior to delivery since the owner/operator has the right to
deny acceptance of any waste.
--2. A copy of this letter should accompany the waste at time of disposal,
3. The waste is placed wet into plastic bags and securely sealed to
prevent an airborne condition during handling.
4. The operator shall be notified that the waste is to be covered
immediately with sufficient amounts of dirt or other waste so as to
prevent an airborne condition during final disposal.
5. The operator shall place the waste as far from the top of the
landfill as possible, but in no case within ten (10) feet of the
landfill surface.
The preparation of the asbestos and delivery should comply with OSHA and DOT
standards.
If you have questions concerning this matter, please advise.
Sincerely,
or on Layton, Environmental Engineer
id &Hazardous Waste Management Branch
nvironmental Health Section
JGL:d
cc: Bob Apple
Robert Wiseman
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA James B Hunt, Jr/ DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES Sarah T Morrow, KID, M P H
GOVERNOR SECRETARY

lye
I'
DIVISION OF HEALTH SERVICES
Raleigh, N.C. 27602-2091
Jimmy D. Woodie
Municipal Engineering Services Co., P.A.
P. 0. Box 97
Garner, NC 27529
to," ..
Ronald H. Levine, M.D., M.P.H.
STATE HEALTH DIRECTOR
October 11, 1983
Re: Proposed Landfill on S.R. 1191 in Avery County
Dear Mr. Woodie:
In accordance with G.S. 130-166.18, the proposed site in Avery County
is approved for use as a sanitary landfill.
A permit -for -the -site will be issued upon approval of-_a_satisfactory
construction plan. The construction plan must meet design requirements
in Section ..0503(2) of the North Carolina Solid Waste Management Rules
and, additionally, the following:
1. Disposal area is limited to the hatched area shown on sheet 1.
2. The bottom of the landfill should be scarified and recompacted to
a depth of 6" and any rock encountered should be over -excavated
and refilled and compacted with on -site soils to a depth of two
feet.
This decision may be subject to an administrative hearing upon petition
of anyone whose legal rights, privileges and duties may have been affected
by the issuance thereof.
If you have any questions, please advise.
Sincerely,
r
S rickland, Head
Solid & Hazardous Waste Management Branch
Environmental Health Section
JGL:ns
Enclosure
cc: Robert Wiseman
Julian M. Foscue
J. Gordon Layton
James B. Hunt, Jr. Sarah T. Morrow, M.D., M P.H
5iA1L Chi NORTH CAROUNA GOVERNOR / DEPARTMENT Or HUMAN RESOURCES SECRETARY