2019.02.21_CCO.p8_PPA Manufacturing Process Emissions Test Report

IASDATA\CHEMOURS\15418.002.009\PPA TEST REPORT 102419-AMD 2/21/2019
PPA MANUFACTURING PROCESS
EMISSIONS TEST REPORT
TEST DATES: 07-08 JANUARY 2019
THE CHEMOURS COMPANY
FAYETTEVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA
Prepared for:
THE CHEMOURS COMPANY
22828 NC Hwy 87 W
Fayetteville, North Carolina 28306
Prepared by:
WESTON SOLUTIONS, INC.
1400 Weston Way
P.O. Box 2653
West Chester, Pennsylvania 19380
21 February 2019
W.O. No. 15418.002.009

IASDATA\CHEMOURS\15418.002.009\PPA TEST REPORT 102419-AMD 2/21/2019 i
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Section Page
1. INTRODUCTION..............................................................................................................1 
1.1 FACILITY AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION ...........................................1 
1.2 TEST OBJECTIVES ...............................................................................................1 
1.3 TEST PROGRAM OVERVIEW .............................................................................1 
2. SUMMARY OF TEST RESULTS ...................................................................................4 
3. PROCESS DESCRIPTIONS ............................................................................................5 
3.1 POLYMER PROCESSING AID (PPA) AREA ......................................................5 
3.2 PROCESS OPERATIONS AND PARAMETERS .................................................6 
4. DESCRIPTION OF TEST LOCATIONS .......................................................................7 
4.1 PPA PROCESS STACK ..........................................................................................7 
5. SAMPLING AND ANALYTICAL METHODS .............................................................9 
5.1 STACK GAS SAMPLING PROCEDURES ...........................................................9 
5.1.1 Pre-Test Determinations ...........................................................................9 
5.2 STACK PARAMETERS .........................................................................................9 
5.2.1 EPA Method 0010.....................................................................................9 
5.2.2 EPA Method 0010 Sample Recovery .....................................................12 
5.2.3 EPA Method 0010 Sample Analysis.......................................................15 
5.3 GAS COMPOSITION ...........................................................................................16 
6. DETAILED TEST RESULTS AND DISCUSSION .....................................................18 

APPENDIX A PROCESS OPERATIONS DATA
APPENDIX B RAW AND REDUCED TEST DATA
APPENDIX C LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT
APPENDIX D SAMPLE CALCULATIONS
APPENDIX E EQUIPMENT CALIBRATION RECORDS
APPENDIX F LIST OF PROJECT PARTICIPANTS

IASDATA\CHEMOURS\15418.002.009\PPA TEST REPORT 102419-AMD 2/21/2019 ii
LIST OF FIGURES
Title Page
Figure 4-1 PPA Exhaust Stack Test Port and Traverse Point Location ......................................... 8 
Figure 5-1 EPA Method 0010 Sampling Train ............................................................................. 11 
Figure 5-2 HFPO Dimer Acid Sample Recovery Procedures for Method 0010 ......................... 14 
Figure 5-3 WESTON Sampling System ...................................................................................... 17 

I IASDATA\CHEMOURS\15418.002.009\PPA TEST REPORT 102419-AMD 2/21/2019 iii
LIST OF TABLES
Title Page
Table 1-1 Sampling Plan for PPA Stack ......................................................................................... 3 
Table 2-1 Summary of HFPO Dimer Acid Test Results ............................................................... 4 
Table 6-1 Summary of HFPO Dimer Acid Test Data and Test Results PPA Stack .................... 19 

IASDATA\CHEMOURS\15418.002.009\PPA TEST REPORT 102419-AMD 2/21/2019 1
1. INTRODUCTION
1.1 FACILITY AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION
The Chemours Fayetteville Works (Chemours) is located in Bladen County, North Carolina,
approximately 10 miles south of the city of Fayetteville. The Chemours operating areas on the
site include the Fluoromonomers, IXM and Polymer Processing Aid (PPA) manufacturing areas,
Wastewater Treatment, and Powerhouse.
Chemours contracted Weston Solutions, Inc. (Weston) to perform HFPO Dimer Acid emission
testing on the PPA Stack. Testing was performed on 7-8 January 2019 and generally followed
the “Emissions Test Protocol” reviewed and approved by the North Carolina Department of
Environmental Quality (NCDEQ). This report provides the results from the emission test
program.
1.2 TEST OBJECTIVES
The specific objectives for this test program were as follows:
 Measure the emissions concentrations and mass emissions rates of HFPO Dimer Acid
from the PPA process stack which is located in the PPA process area.
 Monitor and record process data in conjunction with the test program.
 Provide representative emissions data.
1.3 TEST PROGRAM OVERVIEW
During the emissions test program, the concentrations and mass emissions rates of HFPO Dimer
Acid were measured on the PPA process stack source.
Table 1-1 provides a summary of the test locations and the parameters that were measured along
with the sampling/analytical procedures that were followed.

IASDATA\CHEMOURS\15418.002.009\PPA TEST REPORT 102419-AMD 2/21/2019 2
Section 2 provides a summary of test results. A description of the processes is provided in
Section 3. Section 4 provides a description of the test locations. The sampling and analytical
procedures are provided in Section 5. Detailed test results and discussion are provided in
Section 6.
Appendix C includes the summary reports for the laboratory analytical results. The full
laboratory data packages are provided in electronic format and on CD with each hard copy.

IASDATA\CHEMOURS\15418.002.009\PPA TEST REPORT 102419-AMD 2/21/2019 3
Table 1-1
Sampling Plan for PPA Process Stack
Sampling Point & Location PPA Process Stack
Number of Tests: 3
Parameters To Be Tested: HFPO Dimer
Acid
(HFPO-DA)
Volumetric
Flow Rate and
Gas Velocity
Carbon
Dioxide
Oxygen Water Content
Sampling or Monitoring Method EPA M-0010 EPA M1, M2,
M3A, and M4
in conjunction
with M-0010
tests
EPA M3A EPA M4 in
conjunction
with M-0010
tests
Sample Extraction/ Analysis Method(s): LC/MS/MS NA6 NA NA
Sample Size > 1m3 NA NA NA NA
Total Number of Samples Collected1 3 3 3 3 3
Reagent Blanks (Solvents, Resins)1 1 set 0 0 0 0
Field Blank Trains1 1 per source 0 0 0 0
Proof Blanks1 1 per train 0 0 0 0
Trip Blanks1,2 1 set 0 0 0
Lab Blanks 1 per fraction3 0 0 0 0
Laboratory or Batch Control Spike Samples
(LCS) 1 per fraction3 0 0 0 0
Laboratory or Batch Control Spike Sample
Duplicate (LCSD) 1 per fraction3 0 0 0 0
Media Blanks 1 set4 0 0 0 0
Isotope Dilution Internal Standard Spikes Each sample 0 0 0 0
Total No. of Samples 75 3 3 3 3
Key:
1 Sample collected in field.
2 Trip blanks include one XAD-2 resin module and one methanol sample per sample shipment.
3 Lab blank and LCS/LCSD includes one set per analytical fraction (front half, back half and condensate).
4 One set of media blank archived at laboratory at media preparation.
5 Actual number of samples collected in field.
6 Not applicable.

IASDATA\CHEMOURS\15418.002.009\PPA TEST REPORT 102419-AMD 2/21/2019 4
2. SUMMARY OF TEST RESULTS
A total of three test runs were performed on the PPA process stack. Table 2-1 provides a
summary of the HFPO Dimer Acid emission test results. Detailed test results summaries are
provided in Section 6.
It is important to note that emphasis is being placed on the characterization of the emissions
based on the stack test results. Research conducted in developing the protocol for stack testing
HFPO Dimer Acid Fluoride, HFPO Dimer Acid Ammonium Salt and HFPO Dimer Acid
realized that the resulting testing, including collection of the air samples and extraction of the
various fraction of the sampling train, would result in all three compounds being expressed as
simply the HFPO Dimer Acid. However, it should be understood that the total HFPO Dimer
Acid results provided on Table 2-1 and in this report include a percentage of each of the three
compounds.
Table 2-1

Summary of HFPO Dimer Acid Test Results
Source Run No. Emission Rates
lb/hr g/sec
PPA Process Stack
1 1.32E-04 1.66E-05
2 1.40E-04 1.76E-05
3 1.14E-04 1.44E-05
Average 1.29E-04 1.62E-05

IASDATA\CHEMOURS\15418.002.009\PPA TEST REPORT 102419-AMD 2/21/2019 5
3. PROCESS DESCRIPTIONS
The PPA area is included in the scope of this test program.
3.1 POLYMER PROCESSING AID (PPA) AREA
The PPA facility produces surfactants used to produce fluoropolymer products at other
Chemours facilities, such as Teflon®, as well as sales to outside producers of fluoropolymers.
Process streams are vented to a caustic wet scrubber (ACD-A1), carbon bed and vented to a
process stack (AEP-A1). The process inside the building is under negative pressure and the
building air is vented to the process stack (AEP-A1) and the carbon bed.

IASDATA\CHEMOURS\15418.002.009\PPA TEST REPORT 102419-AMD 2/21/2019 6
3.2 PROCESS OPERATIONS AND PARAMETERS
Source Operation/Product Batch or Continuous
PPA AF Column Reboiler/Virgin Pressure Transfers/Virgin or Purified
Continuous once it starts taking off to feed tank Batch (pressure transfers from one vessel to another – every 2 hours)
During the test program, the following parameters were monitored by Chemours and are
included in Appendix A.
 PPA Process
o Caustic Wet Scrubber (ACD-A1)
 Caustic recirculation flow rate
 Differential pressure across the packing

IASDATA\CHEMOURS\15418.002.009\PPA TEST REPORT 102419-AMD 7
4. DESCRIPTION OF TEST LOCATIONS
4.1 PPA PROCESS STACK
Two 4-inch ID test ports are in place on the 30-inch ID fiberglass stack. The ports are 12 feet
(4.8 diameters) from the nearest downstream disturbance (carbon bed outlet) and 32 feet
(12.8 diameters) from the nearest upstream disturbance (stack exit).
Per EPA Method 1, a total of 24 traverse points (12 per axis) were used for M-0010 isokinetic
sampling. See Figure 4-1 for a schematic of the test port and traverse point locations.
Note: All measurements at the test location were confirmed prior to sampling.
30 "
TRAVERSE
POINT
NUMBER
DISTANCE FROM
INSIDE NEAR
WALL (INCHES)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
FIGURE 4-1
PPA PROCESS STACK TEST PORT
AND TRAVERSE POINT LOCATION
IASDATA\CHEMOURS\15418.002.009\FIGURE 4-1 PPA EXHAUST STACK8
32 '
12 '
ID
FAN
CARBON
BED
OUTLET ~ 33 '
1
2
3 1/2
5 3/8
7 1/2
10 3/4
19 3/8
22 1/2
24 3/4
26 1/2
28
29
DRAWING NOT TO SCALE

IASDATA\CHEMOURS\15418.002.009\PPA TEST REPORT 102419-AMD 9

5. SAMPLING AND ANALYTICAL METHODS
5.1 STACK GAS SAMPLING PROCEDURES
The purpose of this section is to describe the stack gas emissions sampling train and to provide
details of the stack sampling and analytical procedures utilized during the emissions test
program.
5.1.1 Pre-Test Determinations
Preliminary test data was obtained at the test location. Stack geometry measurements were
measured and recorded, and traverse point distances verified. A preliminary velocity traverse
was performed utilizing a calibrated S-type pitot tube and an inclined manometer to determine
velocity profiles. Flue gas temperatures were observed with a calibrated direct readout panel
meter equipped with a chromel-alumel thermocouple. Preliminary water vapor content was
estimated by wet bulb/dry bulb temperature measurements.
A check for the presence or absence of cyclonic flow was previously conducted at the test
location. The cyclonic flow check was negative (< 20°) verifying that the source were acceptable
for testing.
Preliminary test data was used for nozzle sizing and sampling rate determinations for isokinetic
sampling procedures.
Calibration of probe nozzles, pitot tubes, metering systems, and temperature measurement
devices was performed as specified in Section 5 of EPA Method 5 test procedures.
5.2 STACK PARAMETERS
5.2.1 EPA Method 0010
The sampling train utilized to perform the HFPO Dimer Acid sampling was an EPA Method
0010 train (see Figure 5-1). The Method 0010 consisted of a borosilicate nozzle that attached
directly to a heated borosilicate probe. In order to minimize possible thermal degradation of the
HFPO Dimer Acid, the probe and particulate filter were heated above stack temperature to

IASDATA\CHEMOURS\15418.002.009\PPA TEST REPORT 102419-AMD 10
minimize water vapor condensation before the filter. The probe was connected directly to a
heated borosilicate filter holder containing a solvent extracted glass fiber filter.
HEATED AREA
TEMPERATURE
FILTER HOLDER ~- SENSOR RIGID BOROSIUCATE TUBING
OR FLEXIBLE SAMPLE LINE
VENT
yyp~~ CONDENSER
TEMPERATURE ~-2SORBENT
SENSOR MODULES ONE AND TWO
V \
REVERSE TYPE
PITOT TUBEHEATED PROBE/
BUTTON HOOK
NOZZLE
TEMPERATURE
SENSOR
CHECK
VALVE
SILICA GEL
~-+
ICE WATER RECIRCULATION PUMP
ORIFICE
NOTE: THE CONDENSER MAY BE POSITIONED HORIZONTALLY. ORIFICE
THE XAD-2 SORBENT MODULE WILL ALWAYS 8E IN A VERTICAL POSITION.. MANOMETER
-~
ICE WATER
CONDENSATE TRAP IMPINGERS CONDENSATE TRAP ( ICE BATH
IMPINGER
TEMPERATURE
SENSORS VACUUM
BY-PASS VALVE GAUGE
VACUUM LINE
MAIN
VALVE
DRY GAS METER q~R-TIGHT PUMP
FIGURE 5-1
EPA METHOD 0010 SAMPLING TRAIN
IASDATA\CHEMOURS\15418,002.9\FIGURE 5-1 METHOD 0010

IASDATA\CHEMOURS\15418.002.009\PPA TEST REPORT 102419-AMD 2/21/2019 12
A section of borosilicate glass (or flexible polyethylene) tubing connected the filter holder exit to
a Grahm (spiral) type ice water-cooled condenser, an ice water-jacketed sorbent module
containing approximately 40 grams of XAD-2 resin. The XAD-2 resin tube was equipped with
an inlet temperature sensor. The XAD-2 resin trap was followed by a condensate knockout
impinger and a series of two impingers that contained 100 milliliters of high purity distilled
water. The train also included a second XAD-2 resin trap behind the impinger section to evaluate
possible sampling train breakthrough. Each XAD-2 resin trap was connected to a 1-liter
condensate knockout trap. The final impinger contained 300 grams of dry pre-weighed silica gel.
All impingers and the condensate traps were maintained in an ice bath. Ice water was
continuously circulated in the condenser and both XAD-2 modules to maintain method required
temperature. A control console with a leakless vacuum pump, a calibrated orifice, and dual
inclined manometers was connected to the final impinger via an umbilical cord to complete the
sample train.
HFPO Dimer Acid Fluoride (CAS No. 2062-98-8) that is present in the stack gas is expected to
be captured in the sampling train along with HFPO Dimer Acid (CAS No. 13252-13-6). HFPO
Dimer Acid Fluoride undergoes hydrolysis instantaneously in water in the sampling train and
during the sample recovery step and will be converted to HFPO Dimer Acid such that the
amount of HFPO Dimer Acid emissions represents a combination of both HFPO Dimer Acid
Fluoride and HFPO Dimer Acid.
During sampling, gas stream velocities were measured by attaching a calibrated S-type pitot tube
into the gas stream adjacent to the sampling nozzle. The velocity pressure differential was
observed immediately after positioning the nozzle at each traverse point, and the sampling rate
adjusted to maintain isokineticity at 100% ± 10. Flue gas temperature was monitored at each
point with a calibrated panel meter and thermocouple. Isokinetic test data was recorded at each
traverse point during all test periods, as appropriate. Leak checks were performed on the
sampling apparatus according to reference method instructions, prior to and following each run,
component change (if required), or during midpoint port changes.
5.2.2 EPA Method 0010 Sample Recovery
At the conclusion of each test, the sampling train was dismantled, the openings sealed, and the
components transported to the field laboratory trailer for recovery.

IASDATA\CHEMOURS\15418.002.009\PPA TEST REPORT 102419-AMD 2/21/2019 13
A consistent procedure was employed for sample recovery:
1. The two XAD-2 covered (to minimize light degradation) sorbent modules (1 and 2) were
sealed and labeled.

2. The glass fiber filter(s) were removed from the holder with tweezers and placed in a
polyethylene container along with any loose particulate and filter fragments.

3. The particulate adhering to the internal surfaces of the nozzle, probe and front half of the
filter holder were rinsed with a solution of methanol and ammonium hydroxide into a
polyethylene container while brushing a minimum of three times until no visible
particulate remained. Particulate adhering to the brush was rinsed with methanol/
ammonium hydroxide into the same container. The container was sealed.

4. The volume of liquid collected in the first condensate trap was measured, the value
recorded, and the contents poured into a polyethylene container.

5. All train components between the filter exit and the first condensate trap were rinsed with
methanol/ammonium hydroxide. The solvent rinse was placed in a separate polyethylene
container and sealed.

6. The volume of liquid in impingers one and two, and the second condensate trap, were
measured, the values recorded, and the sample was placed in the same container as Step 4
above, then sealed.

7. The two impingers, condensate trap, and connectors were rinsed with methanol/
ammonium hydroxide. The solvent sample was placed in a separate polyethylene
container and sealed.

8. The silica gel in the final impinger was weighed and the weight gain value recorded.

9. Site (reagent) blank samples of the methanol/ammonium hydroxide, XAD resin, filter
and distilled water were retained for analysis.

Each container was labeled to clearly identify its contents. The height of the fluid level was
marked on the container of each liquid sample to provide a reference point for a leakage check
during transport. All samples were maintained cool.
During each test campaign, an M-0010 blank train was set up near the test location, leak checked
and recovered along with the respective sample train. Following sample recovery, all samples
were transported to TestAmerica Laboratories, Inc. (TestAmerica) for sample extraction and
analysis.
See Figure 5-2 for a schematic of the M-0010 sample recovery process.
FILTER
SAMPLE FRACTION 1
SEAL IN LABELED POLYETHYLENE
BOTTLE. COMPLETE CUSTODY
FORM, SECURE SAMPLE AND KEEP
COOL
NOZZLE, PROBE AND
FRONT-HALF FILTER HOLDER
SAMPLE FRACTION 2
WASH WHILE BRUSHING WITH
NANOGRADE METHANOU
AMMONIUM HYDROXIDE
SEAL WASHINGS IN LABELED
POLYETHYLENE BOTTLE. MARK
LIQUID LEVEL, COMPLETE CUSTODY
FORM, SECURE SAMPLE AND KEEP
COOL
XAD-2 MODULE ONE
SAMPLE FRACTION 3
REMOVE FROM IMPINGER TRAIN
SEAL ENDS WITH GLASS CAPS,
COVER, LABEL, COMPLETE
CUSTODY FORM, SECURE SAMPLE
AT AND KEEP COOL
FIRST AND SECOND CONDENSATE
TRAPS AND IMPINGER NOS. 1 AND 2
SAMPLE FRACTION 4
BACK-HALF FILTER HOLDER
CONNECTORS, FLEXIBLE LINE
CONDENSER
SAMPLE FRACTION 5
WASH WITH NANOGRADE
METHANOUAMMONIUM HYDROXIDE
TRANSFER WASHINGS TO
POLYETHYLENE BOTTLE; LABEL,
SEAL AND MARK LIQUID LEVEL,
COMPLETE CUSTODY FORM,
SECURE SAMPLE AND KEEP COOL
FIRST AND SECOND CONDENSATE
TRAPS AND IMPINGER NOS. 1 AND 2
SAMPLE FRACTION 6
XAD-2 MODULE TWO
SAMPLE FRACTION 7
REMOVE FROM IMPINGER TRAIN
SEAL ENDS WITH GLASS CAPS,
COVER, LABEL, COMPLETE
CUSTODY FORM, SECURE SAMPLE
AT AND KEEP COOL
IMPINGER NO.4 (SILICA GEL)
MEASURE VOLUME OF LIQUID AND
RECORD
TRANSFER WASHINGS TO
POLYETHYLENE BOTT~E;LABEL,
SEAL AND MARK LIQUID LEVEL,
COMPLETE CUSTODY FORM,
SECURE SAMPLE AND KEEP COOL
WASH WITH NANOGRADE
METHANOL/AMMONIUM HYDROXIDE
TRANSFER WASHINGS TO
POLYETHYLENE BOTTLE; LABEL,
SEAL AND MARK LIQUID LEVEL,
COMPLETE CUSTODY FORM,
SECURE SAMPLE AND KEEP COOL
WEIGH AND RECORD
RETAIN FOR REGENERATION
FIGURE 5-2
HFPO DIMER ACID SAMPLE RECOVERY PROCEDURES FOR~METHOD 0010
IASDATA\CHEMOURS\15418.002.09\FIGURE 5-2 EPA 0010 PG 14

IASDATA\CHEMOURS\15418.002.009\PPA TEST REPORT 102419-AMD 2/21/2019 15
5.2.3 EPA Method 0010 – Sample Analysis
The Method 0010 sampling trains resulted in four separate analytical fractions for HFPO Dimer
Acid analysis according to SW-846 Method 3542:
 Front-Half Composite—comprised of the particulate filter, and the probe, nozzle, and
front-half of the filter holder solvent rinses;
 Back-Half Composite—comprised of the first XAD-2 resin material and the back-half of
the filter holder with connecting glassware solvent rinses;
 Condensate Composite—comprised of the aqueous condensates and the contents of
impingers one and two with solvent rinses;
 Breakthrough XAD-2 Resin Tube—comprised of the resin tube behind the series of
impingers.
The second XAD-2 resin material was analyzed separately to evaluate any possible sampling
train HFPO-DA breakthrough.
The front-half and back-half composites and the second XAD-2 resin material were placed in
polypropylene wide-mouth bottles and tumbled with methanol containing 5% NH4OH for 18
hours. Portions of the extracts were processed analytically for the HFPO dimer acid by liquid
chromatography and duel mass spectroscopy (HPLC/MS/MS). The condensate composite was
concentrated onto a solid phase extraction (SPE) cartridge followed by desorption from the
cartridge using methanol. Portions of those extracts were also processed analytically by
HPLC/MS/MS.
Samples were spiked with isotope dilution internal standard (IDA) at the commencement of their
preparation to provide accurate assessments of the analytical recoveries. Final data was
corrected for IDA standard recoveries.
TestAmerica developed detailed procedures for the sample extraction and analysis for HFPO
Dimer Acid. These procedures were incorporated into the test protocol.
IASDATA\CHEMOURS\15418.002.009\PPA TEST REPORT 102419-AMD 2/21/2019 16
5.3 GAS COMPOSITION
The Weston mobile laboratory equipped with instrumental analyzers was used to measure carbon
dioxide (CO2) and oxygen (O2) concentrations. A diagram of the Weston sampling system is
presented in Figure 5-3.
Each analyzer was set up and calibrated internally by introduction of calibration gas standards
directly to the analyzer from a calibration manifold. The calibration manifold is designed with an
atmospheric vent to release excess calibration gas and maintains the calibration at ambient
pressure. The direct calibration sequence consisted of alternate injections of zero and mid-range
gases with appropriate adjustments until the desired responses were obtained. The high-range
standards were then introduced in sequence without further adjustment.
The sample line integrity was verified by performing a bias test before and after each test period.
The sampling system bias test consisted of introducing the zero gas and one up-range calibration
standard in excess to the valve at the probe end when the system was sampling normally. The
excess calibration gas flowed out through the probe to maintain ambient sampling system
pressure. Calibration gas supply was regulated to maintain constant sampling rate and pressure.
Instrument bias check response was compared to internal calibration responses to ensure sample
line integrity and to calculate a bias correction factor after each run using the ratio of the
measured concentration of the bias gas certified by the calibration gas supplier.
The oxygen and carbon dioxide content of each stack gas was measured according to EPA
Method 3A procedures which incorporate the latest updates of EPA Method 7E. A Servomex
Model 4900 analyzer (or equivalent) was used to measure oxygen content. A Servomex Model
4900 analyzer (or equivalent) was used to measure carbon dioxide content of the stack gas. Both
analyzers were calibrated with EPA Protocol gases prior to the start of the test program and
performance was verified by sample bias checks before and after each test run.
SAMPLE VENT
CONDITIONING
HEATED FILTER SYSTEM Q _ _
HOLDER ~~ ~i
i
i
HEATED HEATED SAMPLE LINE O ~
SAMPLE O CO2 i
PROBE
MOISTURE _ _ i
REMOVAL SAMPLE ~ ~ i
PUMP O ~2 i
~~ ~i
CALIBRATION BIAS LINE O ~ ANALOG
- - i SIGNAL
~ LINE
ao -_~
00 --~
GAS ~
ANALYZERS
i
i
i
CALIBRATION i
GASES e_____ ~J
T ON /OFF VALVE COMPUTER FOR DATA
ACQUISITION AND ACQUISTION
REDUCTION INTERFACE
FIGURE 5-3
WESTON SAMPLING SYSTEM
IASDATA\CHEMOURS115418.002.009\FIGURE 5-3 WESTON SAMPLING SYSTEM
IASDATA\CHEMOURS\15418.002.009\PPA TEST REPORT 102419-AMD 2/21/2019 18
6. DETAILED TEST RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Preliminary testing and the associated analytical results required significant sample dilution to
bring the HFPO Dimer Acid concentration within instrument calibration, therefore, sample times
and sample volumes were reduced for the formal test program. This was approved by the North
Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (NCDEQ).
Each test was a minimum of 96 minutes in duration. A total of three test runs were performed on
the PPA process stack.
Table 6-1 provides detailed test data and test results for the PPA process stack.
The Method 3A sampling on all sources indicated that the O2 and CO2 concentrations were at
ambient air levels (20.9% O2, 0% CO2), therefore, 20.9% O2 and 0% CO2 values were used in all
calculations.
TABLE 6-1
CHEMOURS - FAYETTEVILLE, NC
SUMMARY OF HFPO DIMER ACID TEST DATA AND TEST RESULTS
PPA PROCESS STACK
Test Data
Run number
Location
Date
Time period
1
PPA Stack
01/07/19
1240-1430
2
PPA Stack
01/08/19
0800-0950
3
PPA Stack
01/08/19
1053-1255
SAMPLING DATA:
Sampling duration, min.
Nozzle diameter, in.
Cross sectional nozzle area, sq.ft.
Barometric presswe, in. Hg
Avg. orifice press. diff., in H2O
Avg. dry gas meter temp., deg F
Avg. abs. dry gas meter temp., deg. R
Total liquid collected by train, ml
Std. vol. of H2O vapor coll., cu.ft.
Dry gas meter calibration factor
Sample vol. at meter cond., dcf
Sample vol, at std. cond., dscf ~~~
Percent of isokinetic sampling
GAS STREAM COMPOSITION DATA:
CO2i % by volume, dry basis
O,, % by volume, dry basis
N,, % by volume, dry basis
Molecular wt. of dry gas, lb/lb mole
H,0 vapor in gas stream, prop. by vol.
Mole fraction of dry gas
Molecular wt. of wet gas, lb/lb mole
GAS STREAM VELOCITY AND VOLUMETRIC FLOW DATA:
Static pressure, in. H2O
Absolute pressure, in. Hg
Avg. temperature, deg. F
Avg. absolute temperature, deg.R
Pitot tube coefficient
Total number of traverse points
Avg. gas stream velocity, ft./sec.
Stack/duct cross sectional area, sq.ft.
Avg. gas stream volumetric flow, wacf/min.
Avg. gas stream volumetric flow, dscf/min.
~~~ Standazd conditions = 68 deg. F. (20 deg. C.) and 29.92 in Hg (760 mm Hg)
19
96.0 96.0 96.0
0.190 0.190 0.190
0.000197 0.000197 0.000197
30.40 30.08 30.08
0.71 0.59 0.62
65.8 51.5 65.2
526 511 525
19.2 19.5 25.2
0.9 0.9 1.2
0.9915 0.9915 0.9915
44.005 40.425 42.900
44.579 41.643 43.038
103.6 103.7 106.6
0.0 0.0 0.0
20.9 20.9 20.9
79.1 79.1 79.1
28.84 28.84 28.84
0.020 0.022 0.027
0.980 0.978 0.973
28.62 28.60 28.55
0.23 0.23 0.23
30.42 30.10 30.10
62 73 68
522 533 528
0.84 0.84 0.84
24 24 24
37.7 36.3 36.4
4.90 4.90 4.90
11073 10677 10703
11155 10414 10470
2/8f2019 4:09 PM 010719 PPA stack
TABLE 6-1 (cont.)
CHEMOURS - FAYETTEVILLE, NC
SUMMARY OF HFPO DIMER ACID TEST DATA AND TEST RESULTS
PPA PROCESS STACK
TEST DATA
Run number 1 2 3
Location PPA Stack PPA Stack PPA Stack
Date 01/07/19 01/08/19 01/08/19
Time period 1240-1430 0800-0950 1053-1255
LABORATORY REPORT DATA, ug.
HFPO Dimer Acid 3.9945 4.2320 3.5520
EMISSION RESULTS, ug/dscm.
HFPO Dimer Acid 3.16 3.59 2.91
EMISSION RESITLTS, Ib/dscf.
HFPO Dimer Acid 1.98E-10 2.24E-10 1.82E-10
EMISSION RESiTLTS, lb/hr.
HFPO Dimer Acid 132E-04 1.40E-04 1.14E-04
EMISSION RESULTS, g/sec.
HFPO Dimer Acid 1.66E-OS 1.76E-OS 1.44E-OS
20
z~scmv aaa rm OIO]19 PPA Slick
IASDATA\CHEMOURS\15418.002.009\PPA TEST REPORT 102419-AMD 2/21/2019
APPENDIX A
PROCESS OPERATIONS DATA
21
Date  1/7/2019Time 1100Stack TestingA/F column Feed Ratev (pounds per hour)Charging water to Hyd ‐ ventingCharging Sulfuric acid  ‐ ventingHydrolysis ‐ Wash Tank pressure Transfer to Hydrolysis Hydrolysis ‐ Phase Settle         1:45 to 2:30Vap heels pressure transfer Vap cycle       12:45 to 1:30Venting after press tran from North/South Acid tank to HydDAF tran to Hyd ‐ venting during transferHydrolysis ‐ transfer to Waste Acid TrailerScrubber Recirculation FlowScrubber dP38 gpmless than 0.5 inwcRun 1 ‐ 1240‐143012:45 to 1:451100 1200 1300 1400 150022
Date  1/8/2019Time 1100Stack TestingA/F column Feed Ratev (pounds per hour)Charging water to Hyd ‐ ventingCharging Sulfuric acid  ‐ ventingHydrolysis ‐ Wash Tank pressure Transfer to Hydrolysis Hydrolysis ‐ Phase Settle       8:45 to 9:30 No transfersVap heels pressure transfer Vap cycle Venting after press tran from North/South Acid tank to HydDAF tran to Hyd ‐ venting during transfer    8 am to 8:45 No transfersHydrolysis ‐ transfer to Waste Acid TrailerScrubber Recirculation FlowScrubber dPRun 2 ‐ 0800‐0950 Run 3 ‐ 1053‐125538 gpm for durationless than 0.5 inwc for duration800 900 1000 1100 120023

IASDATA\CHEMOURS\15418.002.009\PPA TEST REPORT 102419-AMD 2/21/2019
APPENDIX B
RAW AND REDUCED TEST DATA

24
CHEMOURS - FAYETTEVILLE, NC
INPUTS FOR ~IFPO DIMER ACID CALCULATIONS
PPA PROCESS STACK
Test Data
Run number I Z 3
Location PPA Stack PPA Stack PPA Stack
Date 01/07/19 01/08(19 01/08/19
Time period 1240-1430 0800-0950 1053-1255
Operator ASKS JL/KS JL/KS
Inputs For Calcs.
Sq. rt. delta P 0.67728 0.64296 0.64656
Delta H 0.7121 0.5946 0.6217
Stack temp. (deg.F)62.0 72.6 68.1
Meter temp. (deg.F)65.8 51.5 65.2
Sample volume (act.)44.005 40.425 42.900
Barometric press. (in.Hg)30.40 30.08 30.0&
Volume HZO imp. (ml)9.0 ] 0.~14.0
Weight change sil. gel (g)] 0.2 9.5 1 1.2
COZ 0.0 0.0 Q.(}
OZ 20.9 20.)20.9
NZ 79.1 79.1 79.1
Area of stack (sq.ft.)4900 4.900 49G0
Sample time (min.)96.C~96.0 96.0
Static pressure (in.HzO)0.23 0.~3 0.23
Nozzle dia. (in.)0.190 4.190 0.19Q
Meter box cal.U.9~115 0.9915 O.y915
Cp of pitot tube 0.$4 0.84 0.84
Traverse points 24 24 24
2!8!20 t9 4:12 PM 010719 PPA stack25
Sample and Velocity Traverse Point Data Sheet -Method 1
Cllent ~G +KDa~S Operator / ~~
LoacuoNPlant L' Date G~
Source ~~~. W.O. Number F' :~~"~
Duct Typs ~ Grcular q Raclenpular Duct ~"°~f0o""'~'
Trovslsa Typs Parlrulete Traverse Veladly Traverse q CEM Traverse
nce from far waq to outsWe of In. n C 1~ Flow Dlsturbaness
]e In. = D — Upstream - A (R) ~ r
i o/ Duct, diameter (In.) = GD d Downstream - 8 ft ~
d Duct (R') Upstream - A duct diameters .+-
TreversePoints ~ ' ~. ~Dowr~Veam - B (duct dlametersl .t
Rattan ularDuctsON
width or Doti rattan uler duct on (In. i rd
otel Ports (rectangular duct only ~~~
EauNalent Diameter = (2'LhNV(L+W I r
T v~rs~ Point Locations
Trava~a
Post %otDuct
DLttenw ham
ride ova
Wep In
ois~nca rrom o~,a~ a
PoA In
Z ~`~r
3
4
<< ~
~
~
Z
g ~,s 2Z ~l2
6 7 s~~ sly
a 2 S 37'-~
s ~ z 3 Y.'Z s~
~o ~~5-2 2F ~L l`2.
~~s 2B,o K~
,z ~~_Z-~C, ~4 `t
CB17 Paint p Wuuim~rA 13n~) t tl8nlon Point l.nc~lbns
1 0.167
2 0.50
3 U.833
Note: 1lsteck dla < 12 tr~ use EPA Method 1A
(Sample port upstream of pilot port)
Nda: I(slack die >24• Ih~n adJusl Irevmsa polnl ro 1 Inch from wall
K Black dla c24' then adJuel trevaroa point Eo O.S Inch from wWl
Trev~n~PoMlLoeatlonP~rontofSbctCNwbr
NnbuatTnnnePolls
~Z I 7 I ~S 6 I 7 f ~ 9 I 14 I II I IZ
r ~IJ 11.6 ~ 6.7 r ~ 1.~~~ 11 ~I.6 ~11
r ~ 2~ffA 15 11.T~~{~~Ll~1 S9
3 I I I TS I I ~9.s I I n.~I f II.6 I II.1~I
.e~~f.-'.,~::.-f..'
_I a913~...~70.~~_~.~3..'}12b~-..FUJI
. e s I F I t ~.~l I s7-7 I I ~~s
-
l
-
1 ~S-X5.6~ ~6 "':__ ._,..%b._ .IQ6 6S~
•1 1 1 I I I I I I l 0931 I PA I s+.+ l
P ~1~:: _I'.t:'i 1 _I ,F%el !sA{_17s
o nl 9 I I I I I I I I I 19I.1 I ~ 11.1
l 10 ,_,.~~.-;.___--- _...__....97d ..111
" 111 1 I I C I I I I I I I 197]1
Dua Diame,o
a ~
ti 32
~~
e
,vFZ
v
m Fb Oirturhana ~Dlshnce A)
° I ~
Slack Dlamelar> 21 Mchas or.~
t
~.~o. .1 w
v.NaA.~. rmn.. voMb
~.wd..,~s~~~.~.~ °~
~o
0
Tnr~ne fbMh br VMoc~y id
~i
(ornxerin -e.~d~ E.p.n.ion. tao.don. Nc.)
SW 01~v4~~ v.12-b 1cl~
• ~ o a a
Uucl Olrrrlw~ Oawtitr~m imm FW OkWr6~nc~ (UYlriu 6)
~ Trn~mPolnllacatlenPxon1e181~ekA~eUn~Wu
1 Nur~E.r otTA~aa~b~i z ~ ~~s l e ~~I +Iw n u
T 4 27.0 16.7 f7S WA IJ 7J O 3.6 S.0 /3 12
~Z HJ tO.G AS 70D II9 2U W I6.7 110 lIL I23
~~I~I 1
. ~l ~ I 1
I~uE~.slJaif~~.~l~s.~ln~ln~l:zolutlmal
I l73 I R➢ I SI.1I 'A~(`13l 731D 1 3L1 3tt t ]9.]"I
r c~s ~— 1 ~~90.0 75A 6t.7 J6J 340 IS.O X0.9 )l,5
s ~ I 6{_"I I F 1 { 9L71~U 16LfI f1:1 135DI SRO F
• ~{1I I I 1 I I I92911u~TUI~SAIsv.l ISr2I
~P•~fll 117 75D ~q2 ~.S
e 9 w,~e.o n~ ~e
i ~10f I . 1 1 1 I 1 t 'l"-I9SAf16.~iA1I
^ LI 1 I 1 I I 1 !I I 19s~ I ns
' ~~ss,
26
ISOKINETIC FIELD DATA SHEET Method 0010 HFPO Dimer Acid Page ors
Client Chemours Smock Conditions Meter Box ID ~ {K FaCtof ` s sw.o.#isa~a.002.00s.000~Assumed Actual MeterBox Y , qq ~ $'
Project ID Chemours ~o Moisture ~Meter Box Del H $f Leak Checks If11681 Mid-Point Final
Mode/Source iD PPA impinger Vol (ml)Probe ID /Length ` ~ ~j Sample Train (ft')" ,oC;, • {~
Samp. Loc. ID STK Silica gel (g)(/J,Probe Material Bono Leak Check (8 (in Hg)"~'
Run No.ID 1 CO2, 9~o by Vol ~~ ~Pitot /Thermocouple ID _ (, ~{ ~ Pftot good ye / no y / no 1 no
Test Method ID M 001 o HFPO Dimer Acid 02, °~ by Vol ~~. ~',~Pitot Coefficient 0.84 Orsat good ye / no ye / no / rro
Date ID
Source/LocaUon
Sample Date
Baro. Press (in Hg)
Operator
7JAN2019
PPA Staelc
~ - "+~~~ j ~
~ , ~ p
5 ~ k- $
Temperature (°F)
Meter Temp (°F)
StaUc Press (in H2O)
,/
Ambient Temp (°F)
S~ Nozzle ID
~ ~ Avg Noule Dia (in)
y~ ? 3 ~J, ~ Area of Stack (ft)
Sample Time
~-" ~~`! Q Total Traverse Pts
„ ~~a Temp Check Pre-Test et
, 1 Cr U 3 Meter Box Temp ~~
~ yv 3 Reference Temp ,s ~
y~~`~,,,,,, ,/ Pass/Fail (+/- 2°) s /Fail
Tem Cha Res nse7_4 v P ~ Po Yes-s/ no
Post-Test Set
„~'~ ~
/Fail
/ no
•
~0~~~c~~r~:~~~~a~~~~~~~~~~~a
~~~~~~~~r~~~~~~~~a~~-~r~~r~~r~r~r~~~~~~~-~~~~rr~~~~~~~~~r. c ~r~~~r~~~
~~~~~~r~~r~r~~~r~~~~-~
~~~~~~~~~~~o~~,~~~~~r~~~~~r~~~r~~~o~~~~~~~~~~r~rr~~~~t~~r~~~►~m~~r~~ra~a
e~~■~~~r~~~~ar~~~~► ~r~~rr~~~~~~~~m~~~~~~~~~~~~~m~~~~~r~~■~~~~r~~m~Ra~~~~~~~~~~~~~~s~~~~r~~~~~r~~ar~~~~~r~~~~r~~r~ra~~r~.~~~
nvy .~y~ ~ vcuay r, v c~ n
Avg Sgrt Del H
~E~l ~cio~5✓ ~~~~~ ~ I „~~~5. ~.~ ~ 1~9
Comments:
vac I ~ ~ p
V
27
ISOHINETIC FIELD DATA SHEET
Client chemours Stack Conditions
w.o.#15ais.00z,~oa.000~Assumed Actual
Protect ID Chemours 9'o Moisture
Mode/Source ID PPA Impinger Vol (ml)~ f~
Samp. Loc. ID STK Silica gei (g)„~
Run No.ID +~ ].,CO2, % by Vol Q,
Test Method ID M 0010 HFPO DimerAcid 02, % by Vol 'ZlJ,~
Date ID 7JAN2019 Temperature (°~
Source/Location PPA Stack Meter Temp (°F)
Sample Date ~~ ~ q
—~
Static Press (in Hz0) , ~. ~2
Baro. Press (in Hg)
Operator C v Ambient Temp(°F) ~Q°
Method 0010 HFPO Dimer Acid
Meter Box ID ~_ ~
Meter Box Y ~j , cj ~ ~
Meter Box Del H OO ,Leak Checks
Probe ID /Length (Drj G ~Sample Train (ft') ~
Probe Material Boro Leak Check ~ (in Hg)
Pitot /Thermocouple ID G ~([~Pitot good
Pitot Coe~cient 0.84 Orsat good
NoaleiD rj .1 y(~ '.TempCheck
_Avg Noale Dia (in)v ~ ~ 9(>Meter Box Temp
Area of Stack (ft2)~/ , Cj d ~/Reference Temp
Sample Time v Pass/Fail (+/- 20~
Total Traverse Pts ~/ ~/Temp Change Response '
Page _ of _
K Factor ~„~`~ ~ , ~~ L'
Initial Mid-Point Final
r ~,~~ •
r~ra~ry
Nre- I est Set Nost- I est Set
S3
.52. 3,
Fail /Fail
yes no / no
Ylt~.
~~—~
~~—«~~r~~~~~~~a~a~~r ~■l~d~~~c~s~~~0~~
0~3~l~R~1~~i~~L`G~~~~i~~i~'~~~~~ia~~~~~~~L~C~~L~~r~l~L~il~E~~i1~L'~'i~~~'~~~~r~~~~I~~i G~"i0~'~~■~ ''~~L~~r ~~~,~~~~~—~~f~~~~
—~— -----~t~—~~
~~' ~~Q~i~~~T~~F~Qr'~~~~~~~~i
~liT►~~~~. ~~~~fl~t~~)~~~C~~
~~'~,l~Y ~7 i~~~~~L~~~Si~~~~~~~c~~Q~ti~~6~~E'~iE~~ri~~~~~~i~Q~i~~t~~~~~~m'~v~~~fc~~~«~~-~~E~~~+~~~~0~
. ,
~~T~"-~ 1
~ ~
~•a ~y~• ~ ~~~ ~~~~~ ~~ ~~y ~ ~ v r,vy i m ~ mmimax mmrmax nnax i emp nn vac rviax i emp
Avg Sgrt Del H Comments:
28
ISOHINETIC FIELD DATA SHEET
Client Cnemours Stack Conditions
w.o.#~ 5ai e.00z.00s.000l Assumed
Project ID Chemours %Moisture ~ —
Mode/Source ID PPA Impinger Vol (mq
Samp. Loc. ID STK Silica gel (g)
Run No.ID ~ ~CO2, 9'o by Vol
Test Method ID M 0010 HFPO Dimer Acid 02, 9'o by Vo! p , ~
Date ID 7JAN2019 Temperature (°F) ")
Source/Location PPA Stack Meter Temp (°F) ~,
Sample Date (7 Static Press (in H2O) , ~ ~ ~~
Baro. Press (in Hg)~ d ~ Q
Operator ~ L ~K 5 ~Ambient Temp (°F) l ~
Method 0010 HFPO Dimer Acid Page_of_
Meter Box ID ~ K FactorACtU21 Meter Box Y a \ `~
Meter eox Del H ,C Leak Checks Initial Mid-Point Final
~` Probe ID /Length ~ Sample Train (ft3)
~~2 Probe Material Boro Leak Check (81 (in Hg)
Pit01 / ThERT1000UpIE ID ~~ ~ ~~ ~j ~ ' PitOt good
Pftot Coefficient 0.84 Orsat good
~~
r~~~~~:.
Nome to i ~ a d Temp Check Pre-Test Set Post-Test Set
_Avg Noale Dia (in)/ Q Q 3 Meter Box Temp ~~ Q ~ ~'S
Area of Stack (ft)L r[ p Reference Temp ~ '' ,
Sample Time J Pass/Fail (+/- 2°)Pas /Fail /Fail
Total Traverse Pts 3 Temp Change Response 'e / no may/ no
0~rr ~
~~~~~~~~ r ~~~
~
~,~~~~~~
~~~—~~t_i ■i1~—~~~~~~~
~~—~~~r~~—~~~~~
~~~~l~~~C !~!~. ~~~~[~7L~~~1~3!S~vC~~i~~O~+L~~~C'a~''~~[~+~iT~~~~a[~~~0~~~lR+~'Si~~~~fJl~~~~~0~0~~~'~~~~JL~~~G~l~C~~t~~~~~~■rr~~r~r~~r~r~r~~~~~~~~~~r~~►~~ar~o~~~fz.~~~~~r~r~r~~~~~~~~r~~r~~~~ar~r~~~~-~~~~~~~~~~r~~~Q~~~
~7ilt~~i ~~~-~~~~~
_, ~T(i.-;111
r~vg agrc ueica r ~ r~vg ueica n , ~ i o[ai
av9 ~~~`Y~ 0~,
o.~ll~ 58
I; ~ ~ Hvg 1 m / I MiNMax I MINM27c I Max Temp I Ma7c VeC I M3X Tert1p~~/)J
✓,~29
SAMPLE RECOVERY FIELD DATA
Method 0010 HFPO Dimer Acid
Cllent Chemours W.O. #
Location/Plant Fayetteville, Nc Source &Location
15418.002.009.0001
PPA Stack
Run No. 1 Sample Date j '1 Lq Recovery Date (`l f ~~
Sample I.D. Chemours - PPA - STK - 1 - M 0010 HFPO Dimer Acid -Analyst ~•'y ~ Filter Number
Impinger
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Imp.Total 8 Total
Contents ~ ~
Fina~~~D~Ce~j 2 3 (a ~ Z
Initial ~~ d ~'~°m ~
Gain ~"~y ~-~/d, ~
Impinger Color Labeled?
Silica Gel Condition ~e~ Sealed? ~
Run No. 2 Sample Date ~/~ Recovery Date g `lp
Sample I.D. Chemours - PPA - STK - 2 - M 0010 HFPO Dimer Acid •Analyst ~~ Filter Number /v['r
Impin er
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Imp.Total 8 Total
Contents r6
Final ~~Cd~~'~
Initial D ~D ~(„afQj (~~
Gain 2 ~~CD ,~-
Impinger Color Labeled?
Silica Gel Condition ~49~ Sealed? v
Run No. 3 Sample Date ~~i Recovery Date ~d 8
Sample I.D. Chemours - PPA - STK - 3 - M 0010 HFPO Dimer Acid -Analyst ~~, `~'~ Filter Number ~~
Im in er
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Imp.Total 8 Total
Contents t~
Final G K !~~$6 3CleZ
Initial ~~~Q ~'Q 8 ~~t9
Gain ~`~~_ y ~t ~{lt.2-
Impinger Color , d Labeled?
Silica Gel Condition G a D ~ Sealed?
Check COC for Sample IDs of Media Blanks
30
SAMPLE RECOVERY FIELD DATA
Method 0010 HFPO Dimer Acid
Client
Location/Plant
Chemours
Fayetteville, NC
W.O. #
Source & Loaction PPA Stack
15418.002.009.0001
Run No. Sample Date ~~ Recovery Date ~` ~ w/
Sample I.D. Chemours - PPA - STK - BT - M 0010 HFPO Dimer Aci Analyst Filter Number
Impinger
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Imp.Total 8 Total
Contents
Final d ~0~C~p Z o~
Initial v rdd n 7a.
Gain E(~~~1~~~
Impinger Color ~44~ Labeled? v
Silica Gel Condition C~ Sealed?
Run No. Sample Date Recovery Date
Sample I.D. Analyst Filter Number
Im finger
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Imp.Total 8 Total
Contents
Final
Initial
Gain
Impinger Color Labeled?
Silica Gel Condition Sealed?
Run No. Sample Date Recovery Date
Sample I.D. Analyst Filter Number
Im in er
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Imp.Total 8 Total
Contents
Final
Initial
Gain
Impinger Color Labeled?
Silica Gel Condition Sealed?
Check COC for Sample IDs of Media Blanks
31
METHODS AND ANALYZERS
Client:Chemours Project Number:15418.002.009Location:CHEMOURS Operator:CMHSource:PPA Date:7 Jan 2019
File: C:\DATA\Chemours\010719 PPA stack.cem
Program Version: 2.1, built 19 May 2017 File Version: 2.02
Computer: WSWCAIRSERVICES Trailer: 27
Analog Input Device: Keithley KUSB-3108
Channel 1
Analyte
Method
Analyzer Make, Model &Serial No
Full-Scale Output, my
Analyzer Range,
Span Concentration,
Channel 2
Analyte
Method
Analyzer Make, Model &Serial No
Full-Scale Output, my
Analyzer Range,
Span Concentration,
O~
EPA 3A, Using Bias
Servomex 4900
10000
25.0
21.0
COz
EPA 3A, Using Bias
Servomex 4900
10000
20.0
16.6
32
CALIBRATION DATA
Number 1
Client: Chemours Project Number: 15418.002.009Location: CHEMOURS Operator: CMHSource: PPA Date: 7 Jan 2019
Start Time: 11:24
Os
Method: EPA 3A
Calibration Type: Linear Zero and High Span
Calibration Standards
Cylinder ID
12.0 CC18055
21.0 SG9169108
Calibration Results
Zero 5 my
Span, 21.0 % 7992 my
Curve Coefficients
Slope Intercept
380.3 5
COz
Method: EPA 3A
Calibration Type: Linear Zero and High Span
Calibration Standards
Cylinder ID
8.9 CC18055
16.6 SG9169108
Calibration Results
Zero 5 my
Span, 16.6 % 5516 my
Curve Coefficients
Slope Intercept
332.4 5
v~~-,:~
SOLUTIONS
33
Client: Chemours Project Number: 15418.002.009Location: CHEMOURS Operator: CMHSource: PPA Calibration 1 Date: 7 Jan 2019
Start Time: 11:24
Os
Method: EPA 3A
Span Conc. 21.0 °/a
Slope 380.3 Intercept 5.0
Standard Result Difference Error
°/a °/a %StatusZero0.0 0.0 0.0 Pass12.0 12.0 0.0 0.0 Pass21.0 21.0 0.0 0.0 Pass
COz
Method: EPA 3A
Span Conc. 16.6
Slope 332.4 Intercept 5.0
Standard Result Difference Error
StatusZero0.0 0.0 0.0 Pass8.9 8.7 -0.2 -1.2 Pass16.6 16.6 0.0 0.0 Pass
..~, T ;.
SOLUTIONS.
34
BIAS
Number 1
Client: Chemours Project Number: 15418.002.009Location: CHEMOURS Operator: CMHSource: PPA Calibration 1 Date: 7 Jan 2019
Start Time: 11:39
Os
Method: EPA 3A
Span Conc. 21.0
Bias Results
Standard Cal.Bias Difference Error
Gas %%% % StatusZero0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pass
Span 12.0 11.9 -0.1 -0.5 Pass
COz
Method: EPA 3A
Span Conc. 16.6
Bias Results
Standard Cal.Bias Difference Error
Gas %% %% StatusZero0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pass
Span 8.7 8.4 -0.3 -1.8 Pass
.._~ T` :;
SOLUTIONS -~
35
RUN DATA
Number 1
Client: Chemours Project Number: 15418.002.009Location: CHEMOURS Operator: CMHSource: PPA Calibration 1 Date: 7 Jan 2019
Time 02 COz
/o /o
Start R1
12:40 20.7 0.0
12:41 20.8 0.0
12:42 20.8 0.0
12:43 20.8 0.0
12:44 20.8 0.0
12:45 20.8 0.0
12:46 20.8 0.0
12:47 20.8 0.0
12:48 20.8 0.0
12:49 20.8 0.0
12:50 20.8 0.0
12:51 20.8 0.0
12:52 20.8 0.0
12:53 20.8 0.0
12:54 20.8 OA
12:55 20.8 0.0
12:56 20.8 0.0
12:57 20.8 0.0
12:58 20.8 0.0
12:59 20.8 0.0
13:00 20.8 0.0
13:01 20.8 0.0
13:02 20.8 0.0
13:03 20.8 0.0
13:04 20.8 0.0
13:05 20.8 0.0
13:06 20.8 0.0
13:07 20.8 0.0
13:08 20.8 0.0
13:09 20.8 0.0
13:10 20.8 0.0
13:11 20.8 0.0
13:12 20.8 0.0
13:13 20.8 0.0
13:14 20.8 0.0
13:15 20.8 0.0
13:16 20.8 0.0
13:17 20.8 0.0
13:18 20.8 0.0
13:19 20.8 0.0
36
RUN DATA
Number 1
Client: Chemours Project Number: 15418.002.009Location: CHEMOURS Operator: CMHSource: PPA Calibration 1 Date: 7 Jan 2019
Time Os COs
/o /o
13:20 20.8 0.0
13:21 20.8 0.0
13:22 20.8 0.0
13:23 20.8 0.0
13:24 20.8 0.0
13:25 20.8 0.0
13:26 20.8 0.0
13:27 20.8 0.0
13:28 20.8 0.0
end port 1
port 2
13:42 20.7 0.0
13:43 20.8 0.0
13:44 20.8 0.0
13:45 20.8 0.0
13:46 20.8 0.0
13:47 20.8 0.0
13:48 20.8 0.0
13:49 20.8 0.0
13:50 20.8 0.0
13:51 20.8 0.0
13:52 20.8 0.0
13:53 20.8 0.0
13:54 20.8 0.0
13:55 20.8 0.0
13:56 20.8 0.0
13:57 20.8 0.0
13:58 20.8 0.0
13:59 20.8 0.0
14:00 20.8 0.0
14:01 20.8 0.0
14:02 20.8 0.0
14:03 20.8 0.0
14:04 20.8 0.0
14:05 20.8 0.0
14:06 20.8 0.0
14:07 20.8 0.0
14:08 20.8 0.0
14:09 20.8 0.0
14:10 20.8 0.0
14:11 20.8 0.0
37
RUN DATA
Number 1
Client:Chemours Project Number:15418.002.009Location:CHEMOURS Operator:CMHSource:PPA Calibration 1 Date:7 Jan 2019
Time OZ CO2
/o /o
14:12 20.8 0.0
14:13 20.8 0.0
14:14 20.8 0.0
14:15 20.8 0.0
14:16 20.8 0.0
14:17 20.8 0.0
14:18 20.8 0.0
14:19 20.8 0.0
14:20 20.8 0.0
14:21 20.8 0.0
14:22 20.8 0.0
14:23 20.8 0.0
14:24 20.8 0.0
14:25 20.8 0.0
14:26 20.8 0.0
14:27 20.8 0.0
14:28 20.8 0.0
14:30 20.8 0.0
Avgs 20.8 0.0
v'V,~"i'..
SOLUTIONS
38
RUN SUMMARY
Number 1
Client: Chemours Project Number: 15418.002.009Location: CHEMOURS Operator: CMHSource: PPA Calibration 1 Date: 7 Jan 2019
Oz COs
Method EPA 3A EPA 3A
Conc. Units
Time: 12:39 to 14:30
Run Averages
20.8 0.0
Pre-run Bias at 11:39
Zero Bias 0.0 0.0
Span Bias 11.9 8.4
Span Gas 12.0 8.9
Post-run Bias at 14:34
Zero Bias 0.0 0.0
Span Bias 11.9 8.4
Span Gas 12.0 8.9
Run averages corrected for the average of the pre-run and post-run bias
21.0 0.0
:~
SOLUTIONS
39
BIAS AND CALIBRATION DRIFT
Number 2
Client: Chemours
Location: CHEMOURS
Source: PPA Calibration 1
Project Number: 15418.002.009
Operator: CMH
Date: 7 Jan 2019
Start Time: 14:34
OZ
Method: EPA 3A
Span Conc. 21.0
Bias Results
Standard Cal.Bias Difference Error
Gas % % %%Status
Zero 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pass
Span 12.0 11.9 -0.1 -0.5 Pass
Standard Initial*
Gas
Zero 0.0
Span 11.9
*Bias No. 1
Calibration Drift
Final Difference
0.0 0.0
11.9 0.0
Drift
°/a
0.0
0.0
Status
Pass
Pass
COs
Method: EPA 3A
Span Conc. 16.6
Bias Results
Standard Cal.Bias Difference Error
Gas %% % % Status
Zero 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pass
Span 8.7 8.4 -0.3 -1.8 Pass
Standard Initial*
Gas
Zero 0.0
Span 8.4
*Bias No. 1
Calibration Drift
Final Difference Drift
0.0 0.0 0.0
8.4 0.0 0.0
Status
Pass
Pass
V'V'F~T :;:;
SOLUTIONS
40
METHODS AND ANALYZERS
Client: Chemours Project Number: 15418.002.009
Location: CHEMOURS Operator: CMH
Source: PPA Date: 8 Jan 2019
File: C:\DATA\Chemours\010819 PPA.cem
Program Version: 2.1, built 19 May 2017 File Version: 2.02
Computer: WSWCAIRSERVICES Trailer: 27
Analog Input Device: Keithley KUSB-3108
Channel 1
Analyte
Method
Analyzer Make, Model &Serial No
Full-Scale Output, my
Analyzer Range,
Span Concentration,
Channel 2
Analyte
Method
Analyzer Make, Model &Serial No
Full-Scale Output, my
Analyzer Range,
Span Concentration,
02
EPA 3A, Using Bias
Servomex 4900
10000
25.0
21.0
COs
EPA 3A, Using Bias
Servomex 4900
10000
20.0
16.6
V'V~T :.:;
SOLUTIONS
41
CALIBRATION DATA
Number 1
Client: Chemours Project Number: 15418.002.009Location: CHEMOURS Operator: CMHSource: PPA Date: 8 Jan 2019
Start Time: 07:19
Oz
Method: EPA 3A
Calibration Type: Linear Zero and High Span
Calibration Standards
Cylinder ID
12.0 CC18055
21.0 SG9169108
Calibration Results
Zero 30 my
Span, 21.0 % 8006 my
Curve Coefficients
Slope Intercept
379.8 30
COs
Method: EPA 3A
Calibration Type: Linear Zero and High Span
Calibration Standards
Cylinder ID
8.9 CC18055
16.6 SG9169108
Calibration Results
Zero 1 my
Span, 16.6 % 5513 my
Curve Coefficients
Slope Intercept
332.4 1
42
CALIBRATION ERROR DATA
Number 1
Client: Chemours Project Number: 15418.002.009Location: CHEMOURS Operator: CMHSource: PPA Calibration 1 Date: 8 Jan 2019
Start Time: 07:19
Oz
Method: EPA 3A
Span Conc. 21.0
Slope 379.8 Intercept 30.0
Standard Result Difference Error
ova %Status
Zero 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pass
12.0 12.0 0.0 0.0 Pass
21.0 21.0 0.0 0.0 Pass
CO2
Method: EPA 3A
Span Conc. 16.6
Slope 332.4 Intercept 1.0
Standard Result Difference Error
Status
Zero 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pass
8.9 8.6 -0.3 -1.8 Pass
16.6 16.6 0.0 0.0 Pass
V'V'F~"i' :.::
SOLUTIONS
43
BIAS
Number 1
Client: Chemours Project Number: 15418.002.009Location: CHEMOURS Operator: CMHSource: PPA Calibration 1 Date: 8 Jan 2019
Start Time: 07:25
Os
Method: EPA 3A
Span Conc. 21.0
Bias Results
Standard
Gas
Zero
Span
Cal.
%
0.0
12.0
Bias DifFerence
% %
0.0 0.0
12.0 .0.0
Error
%
0.0
0.0
Status
Pass
Pass
COz
Method: EPA 3A
Span Conc. 16.6
Bias Results
Standard Cal.Bias Difference Error
Gas %% %%StatusZero0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 PassSpan8.6 8.4 -0.2 -1.2 Pass
V"V'F~T :::;
SOLUTIONS
44
RUN DATA
Number 2
Client: Chemours Project Number: 15418.002.009Location: CHEMOURS Operator: CMHSource: PPA Calibration 1 Date: 8 Jan 2019
Time Os COZ
/o /o
Start R2
08:00 20.8 0.0
08:01 20.8 0.0
08:02 20.8 0.0
08:03 20.8 0.0
08:04 20.8 0.0
08:05 20.8 0.0
08:06 20.8 0.0
08:07 20.8 0.0
08:08 20.8 0.0
08:09 20.8 0.0
08:10 20.8 0.0
08:11 20.8 0.0
08:12 20.8 0.0
08:13 20.8 0.0
08:14 20.8 0.0
08:15 20.8 0.0
08:16 20.8 0.0
08:17 20.8 0.0
08:18 20.8 0.0
08:19 20.8 0.0
08:20 20.8 0.0
08:21 20.8 0.0
08:22 20.8 0.0
08:23 20.9 0.0
08:24 20.9 0.0
08:25 20.9 0.0
08:26 20.9 0.0
08:27 20.9 0.0
08:28 20.9 0.0
08:29 20.9 0.0
08:30 20.9 0.0
08:31 20.9 0.0
08:32 20.9 0.0
08:33 20.9 0.0
08:34 20.9 0.0
08:35 20.9 0.0
08:36 20.9 0.0
08:37 20.9 0.0
08:38 20.9 0.0
08:39 20.9 0.0
45
RUN DATA
Number 2
Client: Chemours Project. Number: 15418.002.009Location: CHEMOURS Operator: CMHSource: PPA Calibration 1 Date: 8 Jan 2019
Time Os COs
/o /o
08:40 20.9 0.0
08:41 20.9 0.0
08:42 20.9 0.0
08:43 20.9 0.0
08:44 20.9 0.0
08:45 20.9 0.0
08:46 20.9 0.0
08:47 20.9 0.0
08:48 20.9 0.0
end port 1
start port 2
09:02 20.8 0.0
09:03 20.8 0.0
09:04 20.9 0.0
09:05 20.9 0.0
09:06 20.9 0.0
09:07 20.9 0.0
09:08 20.9 0.0
09:09 20.9 0.0
09:10 20.9 0.0
09:11 20.9 0.0
09:12 20.9 0.0
09:13 20.9 0.0
09:14 20.9 0.0
09:15 20.9 0.0
09:16 20.9 0.0
09:17 20.9 0.0
09:18 20.9 0.0
09:19 20.9 0.0
09:20 20.9 0.0
09:21 20.9 0.0
09:22 20.9 0.0
09:23 20.9 0.0
09:24 20.9 0.0
09:25 20.9 0.0
09:26 20.9 0.0
09:27 20.9 0.0
09:28 20.9 0.0
09:29 20.9 0.0
09:30 20.9 0.0
09:31 20.9 0.0
..1-f
soiuTioNs
46
RUN DATA
Number 2
Client: Chemours Project Number: 15418.002.009Location: CHEMOURS Operator: CMHSource: PPA Calibration 1 Date: 8 Jan 2019
Time Oz CO2
/o /o
09:32 20.9 0.0
09:33 20.9 0.0
09:34 20.9 0.0
09:35 20.9 0.0
09:36 20.9 0.0
09:37 20.9 0.0
09:38 20.9 0.0
09:39 20.9 0.0
09:40 20.9 0.0
09:41 20.9 0.0
09:42 20.9 0.0
09:43 20.9 0.0
09:44 20.9 0.0
09:45 20.9 0.0
09:46 20.9 0.0
09:47 20.9 0.0
09:48 20.9 0.0
09:49 20.9 0.0
09:50 20.9 0.0
Avgs 20.9 0.0
V1l'F~T ...;
SOLUTIONS
47
RUN SUMMARY
Number 2
Client: Chemours Project Number: 15418.002.009Location: CHEMOURS Operator: CMHSource: PPA Calibration 1 Date: 8 Jan 2019
02 CO2
Method EPA 3A EPA 3A
Conc. Units % °/a
Time: 07:59 to 09:50
Run Averages
20.9 0.0
Pre-run Bias at 07:25
Zero Bias 0.0 0.0
Span Bias 12.0 8.4
Span Gas 12.0 8.9
Post-run Bias at 10:14
Zero Bias 0.0 0.0
Span Bias 11.9 8.4
Span Cas 12.0 8.9
Run averages corrected for the average of the pre-run and post-run bias
21.0 0.0
~TSOLUTIONS
48
BIAS AND CALIBRATION DRIFT
Number 2
Client: Chemours
Location: CHEMOURS
Source: PPA Calibration 1
Start Time: 10:14
OZ
Method: EPA 3A
Span Conc. 21.0
Project Number: 15418.002.009
Operator: CMH
Date: 8 Jan 2019
Bias Results
Standard Cal.Bias Difference Error
Gas %% %%Status
Zero 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pass
Span 12.0 11.9 -0.1 -0.5 Pass
Calibration Drift
Standard Initial*Final Difference Drift
Gas %% % %Status
Zero 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pass
Span 12.0 11.9 -0.1 -0.5 Pass
*Bias No. 1
COz
Method: EPA 3A
Span Conc. 16.6
Bias Results
Standard Cal.Bias Difference Error
Gas %% %%Status
Zero 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pass
Span 8.6 8.4 -0.2 -1.2 Pass
Calibration Drift
Standard Initial*Final Difference Drift
Gas %% %%Status
Zero 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pass
Span 8.4 8.4 0.0 0.0 Pass
*Bias No. 1
.._, T~ ;;
SOLUTIONS
49
RUN DATA
Number 3
Client: Chemours Project Number: 15418.002.009Location: CHEMOURS Operator: CMHSource: PPA Calibration 1 Date: 8 Jan 2019
Time Os CO2
/o /o
Start R3
10:53 20.7 0.0
10:54 20.7 0.0
10:55 20.7 0.0
10:56 20.7 0.0
10:57 20.7 0.0
10:58 20.8 0.0
10:59 20.8 0.0
11:00 20.7 0.0
11:01 20.7 0.0
11:02 20.7 0.0
11:03 20.7 0.0
11:04 20.8 0.0
11:05 20.7 0.0
11:06 20.7 0.0
11:07 20.8 0.0
11:08 20.8 0.0
11:09 20.8 0.0
11:10 20.8 0.0
11:11 20.8 0.0
11:12 20.9 0.0
11:13 20.9 0.0
11:14 20.9 0.0
11:15 20.9 0.0
11:16 20.9 0.0
11:17 20.9 0.0
11:18 20.9 0.0
11:19 20.9 0.0
11:20 20.9 0.0
11:21 20.9 0.0
11:22 20.9 0.0
11:23 20.9 0.0
11:24 20.9 0.0
11:25 20.9 0.0
11:26 20.9 0.0
11:27 20.9 0.0
11:28 20.9 0.0
11:29 20.9 0.0
11:30 20.9 0.0
11:31 20.9 0.0
11:32 20.9 0.0
V"V~T .;
SOLUTIONS
50
RUN DATA
Number 3
Client: Chemours Project Number: 15418.002.009Location: CHEMOURS Operator: CMHSource: PPA Calibration 1 Date: 8 Jan 2019
Time Os COs
/o /o
11:33 20.9 0.0
11:34 20.9 0.0
11:35 20.9 0.0
11:36 20.9 0.0
11:37 20.9 0.0
11:38 20.9 0.0
11:39 20.9 0.0
11:40 20.9 0.0
11:41 20.9 0.0
end port 1
start port 2
12:04 20.7 0.0
12:05 20.7 0.0
12:06 20.7 0.0
12:07 20.7 0.0
12:08 20.7 0.0
12:09 20.7 0.0
12:10 20.7 0.0
12:11 20.7 0.0
12:12 20.8 0.0
12:13 20.8 0.0
12:14 20.8 0.0
12:15 20.8 0.0
12:16 20.8 0.0
12:17 20.8 0.0
12:18 20.8 0.0
12:19 20.8 0.0
12:20 20.8 0.0
12:21 20.9 0.0
12:22 20.9 0.0
12:23 20.9 0.0
12:24 20.8 0.0
12:25 20.8 0.0
12:26 20.9 0.0
12:27 20.8 0.0
12:28 20.8 0.0
12:29 20.8 0.0
12:30 20.8 0.0
12:31 20.8 0.0
12:32 20.9 0.0
12:33 20.8 0.0
V1l'F~1"::
SOLUTIONS
51
RUN DATA
Number 3
Client: Chemours
Location: CHEMOURS
Source: PPA Calibration 1
Project Number: 15418.002.009
Operator: CMH
Date: 8 Jan 2019
Time Oz CO2
/o /o
12:34 20.8 0.0
12:35 20.9 0.0
12:36 20.8 0.0
12:37 20.8 0.0
12:38 20.8 0.0
12:39 20.8 0.0
12:40 20.9 0.0
12:41 20.8 0.0
12:42 20.8 0.0
12:43 20.8 0.0
12:44 20.9 0.0
12:45 20.9 0.0
12:46 20.9 0.0
12:47 20.8 0.0
12:48 20.9 0.0
12:49 20.9 0.0
12:50 20.8 0.0
12:51 20.9 0.0
12:52 20.8 0.0
12:53 20.8 0.0
12:54 20.8 0.0
12:55 20.8 0.0
Avgs 20.8 0.0
V"V'F~~'::
SOLUTIONS,
52
RUN SUMMARY
Number 3
Client: Chemours Project Number: 15418.002.009Location: CHEMOURS Operator: CMHSource: PPA Calibration 1 Date: 8 Jan 2019
Os COs
Method EPA 3A EPA 3A
Conc. Units
Time: 10:52 to 12:55
Run Averages
f►~i~:~il[i;
Pre-run Bias at 10:14
Zero Bias 0.0 0.0Span Bias 11.9 8.4Span Gas 12.0 8.9
Post-run Bias at 13:10
Zero Bias 0.0 0.0
Span Bias 11.8 8.4Span Gas 12.0 8.9
Run averages corrected for the average of the pre-run and post-run bias
21.1 0.0
~, T ..
SOWTIONS
53
BfAS AND CALIBRATION DRIFT
Number 3
Client: Chemours Project Number: 15418.002.009Location: CHEMOURS Operator: CMHSource: PPA Calibration 1 Date: 8 Jan 2019
Start Time: 13:10
OZ
Method: EPA 3A
Span Conc. 21.0
Bias Results
Standard Cal.Bias Difference Error
Gas % % %%Status
Zero 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pass
Span 12.0 11.8 -0.2 -1.0 Pass
Calibration Drift
Standard Initial*Final Difference Drift
Gas %% %%Status
Zero 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pass
Span 11.9 11.8 -0.1 -0.5 Pass
*Bias No. 2
COz
Method: EPA 3A
Span Conc. 16.6
Bias Results
Standard Cal.Bias Difference Error
Gas %% %%Status
Zero 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pass
Span 8.6 8.4 -0.2 -1.2 Pass
Calibration Drift
Standard Initial*Final Difference Drift
Gas %% %%Status
Zero 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pass
Span 8.4 8.4 0.0 0.0 Pass
*Bias No. 2
.._~ T
SOLUTIONS
54

IASDATA\CHEMOURS\15418.002.009\PPA TEST REPORT 102419-AMD 2/21/2019
APPENDIX C
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT

Note: The complete analytical report is included on the attached CD.
55
Client Sample Results
Client: Chemours Company FC, LLC The
ProjecUSite: PPA Carbon Bed Outlet - M0010
Client Sample ID: G-2942,2943 PPA CARBON BED OUTLET
R1 M0010 FH
Date Collected: 01/07/19 00:00
Date Received: 01/09/19 11:25
Sample Container: Air Train
Method: 8321A - PFOA and PFOS
Analyte Result Qualifier
i HFPO-DA 3.85
Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier Limits
'; 13C3 HFPO-DA 120 50 _ 200
Client Sample ID: G-2944,2945,2947 PPA CARBON BED
OUTLET R1 M0010 BH
Date Collected: 41/07/19 00:00
Date Received: 01/09/19 '11:25
Sample Container: Air Train
Method: 8321A - PFOA and PFOS
i Analyte Result Qualifier RL
' HFPO-DA 0.0956 J 0.200
i Surrogate %Recovery Qual~er Limits
13C3 HFPO-DA 83 50 - 200
Prepared Analyzed Di/ Fac
01/09/1911:32 01/17/1910:31 1
Client Sample ID: G-2946 PPA CARBON BED CUTLET R1 Lab Sample ID: 140-13892-3
M0010 IMP 1,2&3 CONDENSATE
Date Collected: 01/47/19 00:00 Matrix: Air
Date Received: 01/09/19 11:25
Sample Container: Air Train
' Method: 8321A - HFPO-DA
Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac
HFPO-DA
i ND 0.190 0.00969 ug/Sample 01/10/19 08:41 01/17/19 11:49 1
Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier Limits Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac
13C3 HFPO-DA 96 50 - 200 01/10/19 08:41 01/17/19 11:49 1
Client Sample ID: G-2948 PPA CARBON BED OUTLET R1 Lab Sample ID: 140-13892-4
M00'10 BREAKTHROUGH XAD-2 RESIN TUBE
Date Collected: 01/07/19 00:00 Matrix: Air
Date Received: 01/09/19 19:25
Sample Container: Air Train
Method: 8321A - PFOA and PFOS
Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac
HFPO-DA 0.0489 J 0.200 0.0400 ug/Sample 01/09/1911:32 01/17/1910:34 1
Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier Limits
13C3 HFPO-DA 90 50 - 200
TestAmerica Job ID: 140-13892-1
Lab Sample ID: 140-13892-1
Matrix: Air
RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac
0.101 0.0109 ug/Sample 01/10/19 08:39 01/17/19 11:26 1
Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac
01/10/19 08:39 01/17/19 71:26 1
Lab Sample ID: 14Q-13892-2
Matrix: Air
MDl Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac
0.0400 ug/Sample 01/09/1911:32 01/17/1910:31 1
Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac
01/09/1911:32 01/17/1910:34 1
TestAmerica Knoxville
56
Client Sample Results
Client: Chemours Company FC, LLC The TestAmerica Job ID: 140-13892-1
Project/Site: PPA Carbon Bed Outlet - M0010
Client Sample ID. G-2949,2950 PPA CARBON BED OUTLET Lab Sample ID: 140-13892-5
R2 M0010 FH
Date Collected: 01/08/19 00:00 Matrix: Air
Date Received: 01/09/19 11:25
Sample Container: Air Train
'. Method: 8321A - PFOA and PFOS
Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDl Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac
HFPO-DA 3.40 0.151 0.0163 ug/Sample 01/10/19 08:39 01/17/19 11:29 1
Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier Limits Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac
'` 13C3 HFPO-DA 121 50 _ 200 01/10/19 08:39 01/17/19 11:29 1
__-- ___-- _ ___ _ _ ___
Client Sample ID: G-2951,2952,2954 PPA CARBON BED
____ _.__.____ __. ___ p __ __. _
Lab Sam le ID: 140-13892-6
OUTSET R2 M0010 BH
Date Collected: 01/08119 00:00 Matrix: Air
Date Received: 01/09/19 11:25
Sample Container: Air Train
Method: 8321A - PFOA and PFOS
Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac
HFPO-DA 0.556 0.250 0.0500 ug/Sample 01/09/1911:32 01/17/1910:37 1
Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier Limits Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac
13C3 HFPO-DA 92 50-200 01/09/19 11:32 01/17/19 70:37 1
Client Sample ID: G-2953 PPA CARBON BED OUTLET R2 Lab Sample ID: 140-13892-7
MQ010 IMP 1,2&3 CONDENSATE
Date Collected: 01/08/19 00:00 Matrix: Air
Date Received: 01/09!19 11:25
Sample Container: Air Train ____.
~ Method: 8321A - HFPO-DA
Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac
~ HFPO-DA ND 0.205 Q.0105 ug/Sample 01/10/19 08:41 01/17/19 11:52 1
~ Sunogafe %Recovery Qualifier Limits Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac
13C3 HFPO-DA 96 50 - 200 01/10/19 08:41 01/17/19 19:52 1
Client Sample ID: G-2955 PPA CARBON BED OUTLET R2 Lab Sample ID: 140-13892-8
M0010 BREAKTHROUGH XAD-2 RESIN TUBE
Date Collected: 01/08/19 OQ:00 Matrix: Air
Date Received: 01/09/19 11:25
Sample Container: Air Train
Method: 8321A - PFOA and PFOS
" Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac
'i HFPO-DA 0.276 0.200 0.0400 ug/Sample 01/09/1911:32 01/17/1910:41 1
Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier Limits Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac
13C3 HFPO-DA 89 50 - 200 01/09/19 11:32 01/17/79 10:41 7
TestAmerica Knoxville
57
Client Sample Results
Client: Chemours Company FC, LLC The TestAmerica Job ID: 140-13892-1
ProjecUSite: PPA Carbon Bed Outlet - M0010
Client Sample ID: G-2956,2957 PPA CARBON BED OUTLET Lab Sample ID: 140-13892-9
R3 M0010 FH
Date Collected: 01/08/19 00:00 Matrix: Air
Date Received: 01/09/19 11:25
Sample Container: Air Train
`f Method: 8321A - PFOA and PFOS
Anatyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac
HFPO-DA 3.24 0.126 0.0136 ug/Sample 01/10/19 08:39 01/17/19 11:32 1
Surrogate %Recovery Qual~er Limits Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac
~ 13C3 HFPO-DA 122 50 _ 200 01/10/19 08:39 01/17/19 71:32 1
Client Sample ID: 62958,2959,2961 PPA CARBON BED Lab Sample ID: 140-13892-10
OUTLET R3 M001 Q BH
Date Collected: 01108/19 00:00 Matrix: Air
Date Received: 01/09/19 11:25
Sample Container: Air Train
Method: 8321A - PFOA and PFOS
I; Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac
HFPO-DA 0.105 J 0.225 0.0450 ug/Sample 01/09/1911:32 01/17/1910:44 1
Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier Limits Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac
13C3 HFPO-DA 89 50 - 200 01/09/19 11:32 01/17/19 10:44 1
Client Sample ID: G-2960 PPA CARBON BED OUTLET R3 Lab Sample ID: 140-13892-11
M0010 IMP 1,2&3 CONDENSATE
Date Collected: 01/08/19 00:00 Matrix: Air
Date Received: 01/09/19 11:25
Sample Container: Air Train
Method: 8321A - HFPO-DA
I Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac
HFPO-DA 0.207 J 0.210 0.0107 ug/Sample 01/10/19 08:41 01/17/19 11:55 1
Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier Limits Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac
'! 13C3 HFPO-DA 102 50 - 200 01/10/19 08:41 01/17/19 11:55 1
Client Sample ID: G-2962 PPA CARBON BED OUTLET R3 Lab Sample ID: 140-13892-12
M0010 BRE/}►KTHROUGH XAD-2 RESIN TUBE
Date Collected: Q1/08/19 00:00 Matrix: AirDate Received: 01/09/19 11:25
Sample Container: Air Train
Method: 8321A - PFOA and PFOS
Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac
HFPO-DA ND 0.200 0.0400 ug/Sample 01/09/1911:32 01/17/1910:47 1
Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier Limits Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac
13C3 HFPO-DA 89 50-200 07/09/19 11:32 01/17/19 70:47 1
TestAmerica Knoxville
58
Client Sample Results
Client: Chemours Company FC, LLC The
Project/Site: PPA Carbon Bed Outlet QC Samples
Client Sample ID: C-2401,2402 PPA CARBON BED QC M0010
FH BT
Date Collected: 01/08/19 00:00
Date Received: 01/09/19 11:25
Sample Container: Air Train
i Method: 8321A - PFOA and PFOS
TestAmerica Job ID: 140-13893-1
Lab Sample ID: 140-13893-1
Matrix: Air
Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac
HFPO-DA 0.0356 0.0260 0.00281 ug/Sample 01/10/19 08:39 01/17/19 11:36 1
i' Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier Limits Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac
13C3 HFPO-DA 101 50 _ 200 01/10/19 08:39 01/17/19 7 7:36 1
Client Sample ID: C-2403,2404,2406 PPA CARBON BED QC
M0010 BH BT
Date Collected: 01/08/19 00:00
Date Received: 01/09/19 11:25
Sample Container: Air Train
Method: 8321A - PFOA and PFOS
Lab Sample ID: 140-13893-2
Matrix: Air
Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac
HFPO-DA 0.121 J 0.200 0.0400 ug/Sample 01!09/1911:32 01/17/1910:50 1
Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier Limits
13C3 HFPO-DA 91 50 - 200
__ _ _Client Sample ID: C-2405 PPA CARBON BED QC M0010 IMP
1,2&3 CONDENSATE BT
Date Collected: 01/08!19 00:40
Date Received: 01/d9/19 11:25
Sample Container: Air Train
Method: 8321A - HFPO-DA
Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac
01/09/1911:32 01/17/1910:50 1
Lab Sample ID: 140-13893-3
Matrix: Air
~ Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac
HFPO-DA ND
i
0.00250 0.000128 ug/Sample 01/10/19 08:41 01/17/19 11:59 1
i Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier Limits Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac
~'. 13C3 HFPO-DA 706 50-200 01/10/19 08:41 01/17/19 11:59 1
Glient Sample ID: C-2407 PPA CARBON BED QC M0010 Lab Sample ID: 140-13893-4
__.
BREAKTHROUGH XAD-2 RESIN TUBE BT
Date Collected: 01!08!19 00:00 Matrix: Air
Date Received: 01/09/19 11:25
Sample Container: Air Train _.._ _ _.
Method: 8321A - PF~A and PFOS
Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac
i HFPO-DA ND 0.200 0.0400 ug/Sample 01/09/1911:32 01/17/1910:53 1
Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier Limits Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac
13C3HFP0-DA 91 50-200 01/09/1911:32 01/17/1910:53 7
TestAmerica Knoxville
59
Client Sample Results
Client: Chemours Company FC, LLC The TestAmerica Job ID: 140-13893-1
Project/Site: PPA Carbon Bed Outlet QC Samples
Client Sample ID: C-2408 PPA CARBON BED QC M0010 DI Lab Sample ID: 140-13893-5
WATER RB
Date Collected: 01/07/19 00:00 Matrix: Air
Date Received: 01/09/19 11:25
Sample Container: Air Train
Method: 8321A - HFPO-DA
j Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac
I HFPO-DA ND 0.00250 0.000128i ug/Sample 01/10/19 08:41 01/17/19 12:02 1
i
Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier Limits Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac
~ 13C3 HFPO-DA 130 50-200 01/70/19 08:41 01/17/19 12:02 1
Client Sample ID: C-2409 PPA CARBON BED QC M0010 MEOH Lab Sample ID: 140-13$93-6
WITH 5% NH40H RB
Date Collected: 01/07/19 00:00 Matrix: Air
Date Received: 01/09/19 11:25
Sample Container: Air Train
Method: 8321A - PFOA and PFOS
i Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac
HFPO-DA ND 0.0250 0.00500 ug/Sample 01/09/1911:32 01/17/1911:00 1
Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier Limits Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac
''„ 13C3 HFPO-DA 100 50 - 200 01/09/19 1132 01/17/19 11:00 1
Client Sample ID: C-2410 PPA CARBC3N BED QC M0010 XAD-2
RESIN TUBE RB
Date Collected: 01/07/19 00:00
Date Received: 01/09/19 11:25
Sample Container: Air Train
Method: 8321A - PFOA and PFOS
Lab Sample ID: 140-13893-7
Matrix: Air
Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac
HFPO-DA ND 0.200 0.0400 ug/Sample 01/09/1911:32 01/17/1911:03 1
Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier Limits Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac
13C3 HFPO-DA 95 50 - 200 01/09/19 11:32 01/17/19 11:03 1
Client Sample ID: C-2411 PPA CARBON BED QC M0010 MEOH Lab Sample ID: '140-13893-8
WITH 5% NH40H TB
Date Collected: 01/07/19 00:00 Matrix: Air
Date Received: 01/09/19 71:25
Sample Container: Air Train
~ Method: 8321A - PFOA and PFOS
Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac
HFPO-DA ND 0.0250 0.00500 ug/Sample 01/09/1911:32 01!17/1911:06 1
j Surrogate %Recovery Qual~er Limits Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac
13C3 HFPO-DA 116 50 - 200 01/09/1 9 11:32 01/17/19 11:06 1
TestAmerica Knoxville
60
Client Sample Results
Client: Chemours Company FC, LLC The
Project/Site: PPA Carbon Bed Outlet QC Samples_ _ _ _ _Client Sample ID. C-2412 PPA CARBON BED QC M0010 XAD-2
RESIN TUBE TB
Date Collected: 01/07/19 00:00
Date Received: 01109/19 11:25
Sample Container: Air Train
Method: 8321A - PFOA and PFOS
TestAmerica Job ID: 140-13893-1
Lab Sample ID: 140-13893-9
Matrix: Air
Analyte Result Quali£er RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil FacHFPO-DA ND 0.200 0.0400 uglSample 01/09!1911:32 01/17/1911:10 1
Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier Limits
13C3 HFPO-DA 94 50 _ 200
Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac
01/09/1911:32 01/17/1911:10 1
Client Sample ID: C-2413 PPA CARBON BED QC M0010 Lab Sample ID: 140-13893-1U
COMBINED GLASSWARE RINSES (MEOH/5°lo NH40H) PB
Date Collected: 01/07/19 00:00 Matrix: AirDate Received: 01/09/19 11:25
Sample Container: Air Train
Method: 8321A - PFOA and PFOS
j Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil FacHFPO-DA 0.0248 J 0.0250 0.00500 ug/Sample 01/09/1911:32 01/17/1911:13 1
Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier Limits
13C3 HFPO-DA 114 50 - 200
Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac
01/09/1911:32 01/17/1911:13 1
TestAmerica Knoxville
61

IASDATA\CHEMOURS\15418.002.009\PPA TEST REPORT 102419-AMD 2/21/2019
APPENDIX D
SAMPLE CALCULATIONS

62
SAMPLE CALCULATIONS FOR
HFPO DIMER ACID (METHOD 0010)
Client: Chemours Plant: Fayetteville, NC
Test Number: Run 3 Test Date: 01/08/19
Test Location: PPA Stack Test Period: 1053-1255
1. HFPO Dimer Acid concentration, lbs/dscf.
W x 2.2046 x 10-9
Concl = ------------------------
Vm(std)
3.6 x 2.2046 x 10-9
Concl =------------------------------
43.038
Concl =1.82E-10
Where:
W =Weight of HFPO Dimer Acid collected in sample in ug.
Concl =Division Stack HFPO Dimer Acid concentration, lbs/dscf.
2.2046x10-9 =Conversion factor from ug to lbs.
2. HFPO Dimer Acid concentration, ug/dscm.
Conc2 =W l (Vm(std) x 0.02832)
Conc2 =3.6 / (43.038 x 0.02832 )
Conc2 =2.91E+00
Where:
Conc2 =Division Stack HFPO Dimer Acid concentration, ug/dscm.
0.02832 =Conversion factor from cubic feet to cubic meters.
2!8/20194:14 PM 010719 PPA stack
63
3. HFPO Dimer Acid mass emission rate, Ibslhr.
MRl~o~aec> — Concl x Qs(std) x 60 min/hr
MRlco„~~~ = 1.82E-10 x 10470 x 60
n'~1(ou6et) = 1.14E-04
Where:
MRlto„ae~~ = Division Stack HFPO Dimer Acid mass emission rate, lbs/hr.
4. HFPO Dimer Acid mass emission rate, g/sec.
MR2(ou6eU = I'n'1R1 x 453.59 / 3600
M~~(outlet) = 114E-04 x 453.59 /3600
Mxz(ouaeU = 1.44E-OS
Where:
MRZ~o„~eL~ = Division Stack HFPO Dimer Acid mass emission rate, g/sec.
453.6 = Conversion factor from pounds to grams.
3600 = Conversion factor from hours to seconds.
2!8/20194:14 PM 010719 PPA stack
64
EXAMPLE CALCULATIONS FOR
VOLUMETRIC FLOW AND MOISTURE AND ISOKINETICS
Client: Chemours Facility: Fayetteville. NC
Test Number. Run 3 Test Date: 1/08(19
Test Location: PPA Stack Test Period: 1053-1255
1. Volume of dry gas sampled at standard conditions (68 deg F, 29.92 is Hg), dscf.
delta H
17.64 x Y x Vm x (Pb + ----------- )
13.6
Vm(std) _ --------------------------------------
(Tm + 460)
0.622
17.64 x 0.9915 x 42.900 x (30.08 + -----______________ ~
13.6
Vm(std) _--------------------------------------------------=43.038
6521 +460
Where:
Vm(std) =Volume of gas sample measured by the dry gas meter,
corrected to standard wnditions, dsc£
Vm =Volume of gas sample measured by the dry gas meter
at meter conditions, dcf.
Pb =Barometric Pressure, in Hg.
delt H =Average pressure drop across the orifice meter, in H2O
Tm =Average dry gas meter temperature ,deg F.
Y =Dry gas meter calibration factor.
17.64 =Factor that includes ratio of standard temperature (528 deg R)
to standard pressure (29.92 in. Hg), deg Rlia Hg.
13.6 =Specific gavity of mercury.
2. Volume of water vapor in the gas sample corrected to standard conditions, scf.
Vw(std) _(0.04707 x Vwc) + (0.047 t5 x Wwsg)
Vw(std) _(0.04707 x 14.0) + (0.04715 x 11.2) = 1.19
Where:
Vw(std) =Volume of water vapor in the gas sample coaected to
standard conditions, scf.
Vwc =Volume of liquid condensed in impingers, ml.
Wwsg =Weight of water vapor collected in silica gel, g.
0.04707 =Factor which icicludes the density oFwater
(0.002201 Ib/ml), the molecular weight of water
(18.016116-mole), the ideal gas constant
21.85 (in. Hg) (ft3)/lb-mole)(deg R); absolute
temperature at standard conditions (528 deg R), absolute
pressure at standard conditions (29.92 in. Hg), fr3/ml.
0.04715 =Factor which includes the molecular weight of water
(18.0 Ib/16-mole), the ideal gas constant
21.85 (in. Hg) (ft3)!Ib-mole)(deg R); absolute
temperature at standard condirions (528 deg R), absolute
pressure at standard conditions (29.92 in. Hg), and
453.6 g/16, £t3/g.
2/BI20194:14 PM 01719 PPA stack65
3. Moisture content
Vw(std)
bws= -----------------------
Vw(std) + Vm(std)
1.19
bws = --------------------- = 0.027
1.19 + 43.038
Where:
bws = Proportion of water vapor, by volume, in the gas
stream, dimensionless.
4. Mole fraction of dry gas.
Md = 1 - bws
Md = 1 - 0.027 = 0.973
Where:
Md = Mole fraction o£dry gas, dimensionless.
5. Dry molecular weight of gas stream, lbflb-mole.
MWd=(0.440x%COQ)+(0320x%O,)+(0.280x(%N:+~/aC0))
MWd=(0.440x0.0)+(0.320x20.9)+(0.280x(79.1+0.00))
MWd =28.84
Where:
MWd=Dry molecular weight,IbAb-mole.
°l CO2 =Percent carbon dioxide by volume, dry basis.
°/a O, =Percent oxygen by volume, dry basis.
N, =Percent niVogen by volume, dry basis.
CO =Percent carbon monoxide by volume, dry basis.
0.440 =Molecular weight of carbon dioxide, divided by 100.
0320 =Molecular weight of oxygen, divided by 100.
0.280 =Molecular weight of nitrogen or carbon monoxide,
divided by 100.
6. Actual molecular weight of gas stream (wet basis), Ib/Ib-mole.
MWs=(MWdxMd)+(18x(1-Mdp
MWs =(28.84 x 0.973) +( 18 (1 - 0.973 )) = 28.55
Where:
MWs =Molecular weight of wet gas, lb/lb-mole.
18 =Molecular weight of water, lb/16-mole.
2 /812 01 9 4:74 PM 010719 PPA stack66
7. Average velocity of gas stream at actual wndiNons, ftlsec.
Ts (avg)
Vs = 85.49 x Cp x ((dell p)~~")avg x (----------- )~r
Ps x MWs
528
Vs =85.49 x 0.84 x 0.64656 x (----------------- )^ 1/2 = 36.4
30.10 x 28.55
Where:
Vs =Average gas stream velocity, fr/sec.
85.49 =Pirot tube constant, fUsec x -----------------------------
(deg R)(in HBO)
Cp =Pitot tube coefficient, dimensionless.
Ts =Absolute gas stream temperature, deg R = Ts, deg F + 460.
P(static)
Ps =Absolute gas stack pressure, in. Hg. = Pb + -------------
13.6
delt p =Velocity head of stack, in. H2O.
S. Average gas stream volumetric flow rate at actual conditions, wacf/min.
Qs(act) =60 x Vs x As
Qs(act) =60 x 36.4 x 4.90 = 10703
Where:
Qs(act) =Volumetric flow rate of wet stack gas at actual
conditions, wacfJmin.
As =Cross-sectional area of stack, fr'".
60 =Conversion factor from seconds to minutes.
9. Average gas stream dry volumetric flow rate at standard conditions, dscf/min.
Ps
Qs(std) =17.64 x Md x ----- x Qs(act)
Ts
30.10
Qs(std) =17.64 x 0.973 x -------------------- x 10703
528.1
Qs(std) = 10470
Where:
Qs(std) = Volumetric flow rate of dry stack gas at standard
conditions, dscflmin.
2/8120194:14 PM p10719 ppA stack67
1Q. IsokineHc variation calculated from intermediate values, percent.
17327 x Ts x Vm(std)
I = _--_—_-----------------------
VsxOxPsxMdx(Dn)~
17327 x 528 x 43.038
— -- -------------------------------------------- — 106.6
36A x 96 x 30.10 x 0.973 x (0.190)^2
Where:
1 = Percent of isokinetic sampling.
O = Total sampling time, minutes.
Dn = Diameter of Houle, inches.
17327 = Factor which includes standard temperahue (528 deg R),
standard pressure (29.92 in. Hg), the formula for
calculating area of circle D'''~4, conversion of square
feet to square inches (144), conversion of seconds
to minutes (60), and conversion to percent (100),
(io. Hel(in`l(miul
(deg R)(fr'')(sec)
2/8/20194:14 PM 010719 PPA stack68

IASDATA\CHEMOURS\15418.002.009\PPA TEST REPORT 102419-AMD 2/21/2019
APPENDIX E
EQUIPMENT CALIBRATION RECORDS

69
70
Long Cal and Temperature Cal Datasheet for Standard Dry Gas Meter Console
Calibrator PM Meter Box Number 21 Ambient Temp 71
Thermocouple SimulatorDate 12-Feb-18 Wet Test Meter Number P-2952 Temp Reference Source (Accuracy+/- 1°F)
Dry Gas Meter Number 17485140
Setting Gas Volume Temperatures
Orifice Wet Test Dry gas Meter Wet Test Dry Gas MeterManometer Meter Meter
Baro Press, in
Hg (Pb)2g.64~
Calibration Resultsin H2O
(DH)
ft3
Vw)
ft3
Vd)
o f
(Tw)
Outlet, °F
(Tdo)
Inlet, °F
(Tdi)
Average, °F
Td)
Time, min
(0)Y 0H
0.5 5.0
570.015
70.0
69.00 69.00
70A 13.00 0.9948 1.9159575.035 71.00 71.00
5.020 70.00 70.00
1.0 5.0
575.035
70.0
71.00 71.00
71.5 9.3 0.9910 4.9555580.Q82 72.00 72.00
5.047 71.50 71..50
1.5 10.0
580.082
70.0
72.00 72.OQ
73.0 15.6 0.9898 2.0575590.205 74.00 74.00
10.123 73.00 73.00
2.0 10.0
590.205
70.0
74.00 74.00
74.5.13.6 0.9945 2.0792600.296 75.00 75.00
10.091 74.50 74.50
3.0 10.0
600.296
70.0
75.00 75.00
75.5 11.0 0.9873 2.0365610.454 76.00 76.00
10.158 75.50 75.50
Average 0.9915 2.0089Vw-Gas Volume passing through the wet test meter
Vd -Gas Volume passing through the dry gas meter
Tw - Temp of gas in the wet test meter
Tdi - Temp of the inlet gas of the dry gas meter
Tdo -Temp of the outlet gas of the dry gas meter
Td -Average temp of the gas in the dry gas meter
0 -Time of calibration run
Pb -Barometric Pressure
4H -Pressure differential across
orifice
Y -Ratio of accuracy of wet test
meter to dry gas meter
Y=Vw *Pb *(td+460)
Vd * (Pb + ~H~~ * (tw + 460~ 13.6
0.0317 * O H (tw + 460 * O 2
~H - ~ Pb * (td + 460] * [ Vw )
Reference
Temperature Temperature Reading from Individual Thermocouple Input ~Average
Temperature
Reading
Temp
Difference 2
(~/,)
Select Temperature
•~ °C ~ °F Channel Number
1 2 3 4 5 6323232323232 32A 0.0%212 212 212 212 212 212 212.0 0.0%932 932 932 932 932 932 .932.0 0,0%1832 1830 1830 1830 1$30 1830 1830A 0.11 -Channel Temps must agree with +/- 5°F or 3°C
2 -Acceptable Temperature Difference less than 1.5 °~Temp Diff=r~Reference Temp°F~+460 -Test Temp°F~+460~~
L Reference Tem °F + 460
Long Cal _21 2-12-18 71
Y Factor Calibration Check Calculation
MODIFIED METHOD 0010 TEST TRAIN
PPA STACK
METER BOX NO. 21
01/07/2019 + 01/08/2019
MWd = moleculaz wei t source as Ib/Ib-mole.
032 = Molecular wei t of o en, divided b 100.
0.44 = Molecular wei t of carbon dioxide, divided b 100.
0.28 =Molecular wei t of nitro en or carUon monoxide, divided 6 100.
°/a COZ =Percent carbon dio~cide by volume, dry basis.O.0 0.0 U.0
02 =Percent oxygen by volume, dry basis.20.9 20.9 20.9
MWd=(032'Oi)+(0.44+COz)+(0.28'(100-(COz+Oz)))
MWd=(0.32"'20.9)+(0.44*0)+(0.28"`(100-(0+20.9)))
MWd=(6.69)+(0.00)+(22,15)
MWd= 28.84 28.84 28.84
Tma =Source Tam erature, absolute )
Tm =Avers e d meter tam erature , de F. 6~.8 51.5 6~.2
Tma = Ts + 460
Tma = 65.75 + 460
Tma = 525.75 511.46 525.21
Ps =Absolute meter ressure, inches H .
13.60 =S i&c vi ofinerc
delta H = Av iessure dro across the orifice meter Burin sam lin , in H2O 0.71 0.59 0.62
Pb =Barometric Pressure, in H .30.40 30.08 30A3
Pm = Pb + (delta H / 13.6)
Pm = 30.4 + (0.712083333333334 / 13.6)
P~ = 30.45 30.12 30.13
Y a = as meter calibration check value dimensionless.
0.03 = 29.92/528 0.75 2 in. H °/R cfrn2.
29.00 = moleculaz wei ht of air lb/lb-mole.
Vm = Volume of as sam le measured b the d as meter at meter conditions dcf.4~.00~40.425 42.900
Y = as meter calibration factor ased on full calibration 0.9915 0.9915 0.9915
Delta H = D Gas meter orifice calibration coefficien in. H2O.2.0089 2.0089 2.0089
avg SORT Delta H =Avg SQRT press. drop across the orifice meter during sampling , in. HZO 0.8403 0.7692 0.7870
O =Total sam lin time, minutes.96 96 96
Yqa = (O / Vm) * SQRT (0.0319 ' Tma * 29) / (Delta H@' Pm • MWd) "' avg SQRT Delta H
Yqa = (96.00 /44.01) • SQRT (0.0319 ' 525.75 * 29) / ( 2.01 ' 30.45 ' 28.84) * 0.84
Yqa= 2.182 ' SQRT 486371 / 1,763.927 ' 0.84
Y90 ~ 0.9626 0.9512 0.9291
Diff =Absolute difFerence between Y a and Y 2.91 4.06 6.29
Diff=((Y-Yqa)/Y)* 100
Diff =((0.9915 - 0.963) / 0.9915 )' 100
Average DIff= 4.42
Allowable = 5.0
~narzo~eazz Prn 010710 PPA stack72
Type S Pitot Tube Inspection Data Form
Pitot Tube Identification Number: P-696
Inspection Date 1/5/18 Individual Conducting Inspection PM
A.Sido Plane ..........»... J ._ ...............
pp Distance to A Plane (PA) -inches 0.46
B ""~~"~~~~~ ~~'~PB~ Distance to B Plane (PB) -inches 0.46as~a~p~ •..-...-....-. ....- ...-..._. Pitot OD (Dt) -inches 0.375
If all Criteria PASS
Cp is equal to 0.84
PASS/FAIL
PASS
PASS
1.05 D~ < P < 1.5 D, PA must Equal PB
3
._..........._..._...._......._..._....._........_.Are Open Faces Aligned Q YES ~ NOPer endicular to the Tube Axis
P
PASS
i~—F Plm~a ~g--~
Q1. Q1 Q2.
B Angle of Q1 from vertical A Tube-
degrees (absolute) 0~..._......_.._........_.._....._...._.Angle
PASS....._ ......._....._._._ ._..._..___...__........_
of Q2 from vertical B Tube-
degrees (absolute) 0 PASSQ1 and Q2 must be < 10°
e raw t Angle of 61 froms ~°w ..~- ~•~-~~•~~••••~~• vertical A Tube-A ...... A
.....-.-.-.~~:~::~:::..-. .-........-~......... degrees (absolute) 0st(+) ~~PASSsi(-)~._....~......_......_ :::::.._.........~.. Angle of B1 from> .......«~B2(+or-)B vertical B Tube-
~•~~'" de rees absolute 0 PASS
B1 or B2 must be < 5°
's+i—z::'~ Horizontal offset between A and
'`B B Tubes (Z) -inches 0.005 PASS
Z A — ~ BY,._ ..............:::.:.::~::::~ Vertical offset between A and B
"`" "~~~~~~~~~~-"~~ ~ ~~~~~~'~~~~ Tubes (W) -inches 0.014 PASS
W must be < 0.03125 inches
X Distance between Sample
"'~~~~'~~~~`~~~~~ Nozzle and Pitot (X) -inches 0.8 PASSSampling D
X must be > 0.75 inches
Impact Pressure
Opening Plane
.........._ ...............r
Noale Entry Plane
~R....».... _.. ...... _.........
N--~ ~n ~
Temperature Sensor
T SPitotTube
Sample Probe
~-3 inch —►r
T tune Seasor //~ompera ; ! 'lf q md~
Twe S Pitot Tube
s~i~ e~n~
Impact Pressure AYES Q NOOpening Plane isabove the Nozzle Q NAEntry Plane
Thermocouple meets QQ YES Q NOthe Distance Criteria
in the adjacent figure ~ NA
Thermocouple meets AYES Q NOthe Distance Criteria
in the adjacent figure ~ NA
P-696 all in one.MOD 73
irg ~
an Air Liquide company
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
Grade of Product: EPA Protocol
Part Number: E03N179E15AOOE4 Reference Number:Cylinder Number: CC18055 Cylinder Volume:
Laboratory: 124 -Riverton (SAP) - NJ Cylinder Pressure:
PGVP Number: 852018 Valve Outlet:
Gas Code: CO2,02,BA~N Certification Date:
Airgas Specialty Gases
Airgas USA, LLC
60o Union Landing Road
Cinnaminson, NJ o80~-0000
Airgas.com
82-401288926-1
150.5 CF
2015 PSIG
590
Sep 04, 2018
Expiration Date: Sep 04, 2026
Certification performed in accordance wtth "EPA Traceability Protocol for Assay and Certification of Gaseous Calibration Standards (May 2012)" document EPA600/R-12!531, using the assay procedures listed. Analytical Methodology does not require correction for analytical interference. This cylinder has a total analyticaluncertainty as stated below with a confidence level of 95%. There are no significant impurities which affect the use of this calibration mixture. All concentrations are on avolume/volume basis unless otherwise noted.
Do Not Use This Cylinder below 100 psig, i.e. 0.7 megapascals.
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Component Requested Actual Protocol Total Relative AssayConcentrationConcentration Method Uncertainty Dates
CARBON DIOXIDE 9.000 %8.864 % G1 +/- 0.7% NIST Traceable 09/04/2018OXYGEN 12.00 %12.00 % G1 +/- 0.4% NIST Traceable 09/04/2018NITROGEN Balance -
CALIBRATION STANDARDS
Type Lot ID Cylinder No Concentration Uncertainty Expiration DateNTRM 13060629 CC413730 13.359 %CARBON DIOXIDE/NITROGEN +/- 0.6%May 09, 2019
ANALYTICAL EQUIPMENT
InstrumenUMake/Model Analytical Principle Last Multipoint Calibration
Horiba VIA 510-0O2-19GYCXEG NDIR Aug 09, 2018Horiba MPA 510-02-7TWMJ041 Paramagnetic Aug 09, 2018
Triad Data Available Upon Request
Signature on file
Approved for Release Page 1 of 82-401288926-1
74
ira~
an Air Liquide company
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
Grade of Product: EPA Protocol
Part Number: E03N162E15A0224 Reference Number:Cylinder Number: SG9169108 Cylinder Volume:
Laboratory: 124 -Riverton (SAP) - NJ Cylinder Pressure:
PGVP Number: 852017 Valve Outlet:
Gas Code: CO2,02,BALN Certification Date:
Airgas Specialty Gases
Airgas USA, LLC
60o Union Landing Road
Cinnaminson, NJ o8oT7-0000
Airgas.wm
82-401044874-1
157.2 CF
2015 PSIG
590
Nov 18, 2017
Expiration Date: Nov 18, 2025
Certificatlon performed in accordance with "EPA Traceability Protocol for Assay and Certification of Gaseous Calibration Standards (May 2012)" document EPA600lR-12/531, using the assay procedures listed. Analytical Methodology does not require correction for analytical interference. This cylinder has a total analyticaluncertainty as stated below with a confidence level of 95°/a. There are no significant impurities which affect the use of this calibration mixture. All concentrations are on avolume/volume basis unless otherwise noted.
Do Not Use This Cylinder below 100 psig, i.e. 0.7 megapascals.
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Component Requested Actual Protocol Total Relative AssayConcentrationConcentration Method Uncertainty Dates
CARBON DIOXIDE 17.00 %16.58 % G1 +/- 0.7% NIST Traceable 11/18/2017OXYGEN 21.00 %21.00 % G1 +/- 0.5% NIST Traceable 11!18/2017NITROGEN Balance -
CALIBRATION STANDARDS
Type Lot ID Cylinder No Concentration Uncertainty Expiration Date
NTRM 12061336 CC360792 11.002 %CARBON DIOXIDE/NITROGEN +/-0.6%Jan 11, 2018NTRM 09061415 CC273526 22.53 %OXYGEN/NITROGEN +!- 0.4%Mar 08, 2019
ANALYTICAL EQUIPMENT
InstrumenUMake/Model Analytical Principle Last Multipoint Calibration
Horiba VIA 510-0O2-19GYCXEG NDIR Oct 30, 2017Horiba MPA 510-02-7TWMJ041 Paramagnetic Oct 27, 2017
Triad Data Available Upon Request
Siunature on file
Approved for Release Page 1 of 82-401044874-1
75
INTERFERENCE CHECK
Date: 12/4/14-12/5/14
Analyzer Tvae: Servomex - O,
Model No: 49U0
Serial No:49000-652921
Calibration Soan: 21.09
Potlut~nt: 21.09 % O, - CC418692
INTERFERENT GAS
ANALYZER RESPONSE
~ OF CAL[BRAT[ON
SP`~~~~
INTERFERENT GAS RESPONSE (%)INTERFERENT GAS RESPONSE, WITH
BACKGROUND POLLUTANT (%)
CO, (30.17% CC 199689)0.00 -0.01 0.00
NO (445 ppm CC346681)0.00 0.02 0.11
NO, (23.78 ppm CC500749)NA NA NA
N,O (90.4 ppm CC352661)0.00 0.05 0.24
CO (461.5 ppm XC006064B)0.00 0.02 0.00
SO, (4512 ppm CC409079)0.00 0.05 0.23
CHq (453.1 ppm SG901795)NA NA NA
H, (552 ppm ALM048043)0.00 0.09 0.44
HGl (45.1 ppm CC ll830)0.00 0.03 0.14
NH3 (9.69 ppm CC58181)0.00 0.01 0,03
TOTAL INTERFERENCE RESPONSE 1.20
METHOD SPECIFICATION <Z,5
~'~ The larger of the absolute values obtained for the interferent tested with and without the pollutant present was used in summing [he interferences.
~~°~~-~
Chad Walker
a Chd:20140:-Swunioc iYaO 122201976
INTERFERENCE CHECK
Date: 12/4/14-12/5/14
Analyzer Twe: Servomex - CO,
Model No: 4900
Serial No: 49000-652921
Calibration Soan: 16.65
Pollutant: 16.65 % CO, - CC418692
INTERFERENT GAS
ANALYZER RESPONSE
OF CALIBRATtONSP~~,~INTERFERENT GAS RESPONSE (%)~TERFERENT GAS RESPONSE, WITH
BACKGROUND POLLUTANT (% )
CO, (30.17%CC199689)NA NA NA
NO (445 ppm CC346681)0.00 0.02 0.10
NO, (23.78 ppm CC500749)0.00 0.00 0.02
N,O (90.4 ppm CC352661)0.00 0.01 0.04
CO (461.5 ppm XC006064B)0.00 0.01 0.00
SOZ (451.2 ppm CC409079)0.00 0.11 0.64
CH4 (453.1 ppm SG901795)0.00 0.07 0.44
H, (552 ppm ALM048043)0.00 0.04 012
HGl (45.1 ppm CC 17830)0.10 0.06 0.60
NHS (9.69 ppm CC58181)0.00 0.02 0.14
TOTAL INTERFERENCE RESPONSE 2.19
METHOD SPECIFICATION <2,9
~°~ The larger of the absolute values obtained for the interferent tested with and without the pollutant present was used in summing the interferences.
~:~~~
Chad Walker
e cnrctzolacoz-s~m,mcx asoa uzznai977

IASDATA\CHEMOURS\15418.002.009\PPA TEST REPORT 102419-AMD 2/21/2019
APPENDIX F
LIST OF PROJECT PARTICIPANTS

78

IASDATA\CHEMOURS\15418.002.009\PPA TEST REPORT 102419-AMD 2/21/2019
The following Weston employees participated in this project.
Paul Meeter Senior Project Manager
Jacob Little Team Member
Kyle Schweitzer Team Member
Austin Squires Team Member
Chris Hartsky Team Member

79