4404_ROSCANS_1990

J.C. DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOUR, ,S
WEATHER CONDITIONS DIVISION OF HEALTH SERVICES
INSPECTION FOR SANITARY LANDFILLS
PERMIT NUMBER
NAME OF SITE COUNTY
LOCATION SIGNATURE OF PERSON(S) RECEIVING REPORT
SIR: AN INSPECTION OF YOUR LAND DISPOSAL SITE HAS BEEN MADE THIS DATE AND YOU ARE NOTIFIED OF THE VIOLATIONS, IF ANY, MARKED BELOW
WITH A CROSS (X).
(1) PLAN AND PERMIT REQUIREMENTS
— (a) Construction plans shall be approved and followed.
— (b) Specified monitoring and reporting requirements shall be met.
(2) SPREADING AND COMPACTING REQUIREMENTS
— (a) Solid waste shall be restricted into the smallest area feasible.
(b) Solid waste shall be compacted as densely as practical into cells.
(3) COVER REQUIREMENTS
(a) Solid waste shall be covered after each day of operation, with a
compacted layer of at least six inches of suitable cover or as
specified by the division.
— (b) Areas which will not have additional wastes placed on them for
12 months or more shall be covered with a minimum of one foot
of intermediate cover.
—(c) After final termination of disposal operations at the site or a
major part thereof or upon revocation of a permit, the area shall
be covered with at least two feet of suitable compacted earth.
(4) EROSION CONTROL REQUIREMENTS
— (a) Adequate erosion control measures shall be practiced to pre-
vent silt from leaving the site.
— (b) Adequate erosion control measures shall be practiced to pre-
vent excessive on -site erosion.
(5) DRAINAGE CONTROL REQUIREMENTS
(a) Surface water shall be diverted from the operational area.
— (b) Surface water shall not be impounded over or in waste.
(c) Completed areas shall be adequately sloped to allow surface
water runoff in a controlled manner.
(6) VEGETATION REQUIREMENTS
(a) Within six months after final termination of disposal operations
at the site on a major part thereof or upon revocation of a
permit, the area shall be stabilized with native grasses.
(b) Temporary seeding will be utilized as necessary to stabilize the
site.
(7) WATER PROTECTION REQUIREMENTS
(a) The separation distance of four (4) feet between waste and
water table shall be maintained unless otherwise specified by
the division in the permit.
— (b) Solid waste shall not be disposed of in water.
— (c) Leachate shall be contained on site or properly treated prior to
discharge. An NPDES permit may be required prior to the dis-
charge of leachate to surface waters.
(8) ACCESS AND SECURITY REQUIREMENTS
— (a) The site shall be adequately secured by means of gates, chains,
berms, fences, and other security measures approved by the
division, to prevent unauthorized entry.
(b) An attendant shall be on duty at the site at all times while it is
open for public use to ensure compliance with operational
requirements.
— (c) The access road to the site shall be of all-weather construction
and maintained in good condition.
— (d) Dust control measures shall be implemented where necessary.
REMARKS:
DATE
NAME:
(9) SIGN REQUIREMENTS
(a) Signs providing information on dumping procedures, the hours
during which the site is open for public use, the permit number
and other pertinent information shall be posted at the site
entrance.
— (b) Signs shall be posted stating that no hazardous or liquid waste
can be received without written permission from the division.
— (c) Traffic signs or markers shall be provided as necessary to pro-
mote an orderly traffic pattern to and from the discharge area
and to maintain efficient operating conditions.
(10) SAFETY REQUIREMENTS
(a) Open burning of solid waste is prohibited.
— (b) Equipment shall be provided to control accidental fires or
arrangements shall be made with the local fire protection
agency to immediately provide fire -fighting services when
needed.
(c) Fires that occur at a sanitary landfill shall be reported to the
division within 24 hours and a written notification shall be
submitted within 15 days.
(d) The removal of solid waste from a sanitary landfill is prohibited
unless the owner/operator approves and the removal is not
performed on the working face.
—(e) Barrels and dru ms shall not be disposed of u n less they are empty
and perforated sufficiently to ensure that no liquid or hazard-
ous waste is contained therein.
(11) WASTE ACCEPTANCE AND DISPOSAL REQUIREMENTS
— (a) A site shall only accept those solid wastes which it is permitted to
receive.
(b) No hazardous, liquid, or infectious waste shall be accepted or
disposed of in a sanitary landfill except as may be approved by
the division.
— (c) Spoiled foods, animal carcasses, abattoir waste, hatchery waste,
and other animal waste delivered to the disposal site shall be
covered immediately.
— (d) Asbestos waste that is packaged in accordance with 40 CFR 61, as
amended through January 1,1985, may be disposed of separate
and apart from other solid wastes at the bottom of the working
face or in an area not contiguous with other disposal areas, in
either case, in virgin soil. Separate areas shall be clearly marked
so that asbestos is not exposed by future land -disturbing activi-
ties. The waste shall be covered immediately with soil in a
manner that will not cause airborne conditions. Copies of 40
CFR 61 may be obtained and inspected at the Solid and Hazard-
ous Waste Management Branch, Division of Health Services,
P. O. Box 2091, Raleigh, NC, 27602.
(12) MISCELLANEOUS REQUIREMENTS
— (a) Effective vector control measures shall be applied to control
flies, rodents, and other insects or vermin when necessary.
— (b) Appropriate methods such as fencing and diking shall be pro-
vided within the area to confine solid waste subject to be blown
by the wind. At the conclusion of each day of operation, all
windblown material resulting from the operation shall be col-
lected and returned to the area by the owner or operator.
Solid and Hazardous Waste Management Branch
DHS 1709 (Revised 4/85)
Solid & Hazardous Waste Management Branch (Review 4/86) (white — Raleigh Office yellow — Facility green — Preparer)

I.C. DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOUR� S
WEATHER CONDITIONS DIVISION OF HEALTH SERVICES
INSPECTION FOR SANITARY LANDFILLS
PERMIT NUMBER
NAME OF SITE COUNTY
LOCATION SIGNATURE OF PERSON(S) RECEIVING REPORT
SIR: AN INSPECTION OF YOUR LAND DISPOSAL SITE HAS BEEN MADE THIS DATE AND YOU ARE NOTIFIED OF THE'VIOLATIONS, IF ANY, MARKED BELOW
WITH A CROSS (X).
(1) PLAN AND PERMIT REQUIREMENTS
— (a) Construction plans shall be approved and followed.
(b) Specified monitoring and reporting requirements shall be met.
(2) SPREADING AND COMPACTING REQUIREMENTS
— (a) Solid waste shall be restricted into the smallest area feasible.
— (b) Solid waste shall be compacted as densely as practical into cells.
(3) COVER REQUIREMENTS
— (a) Solid waste shall be covered after each day of operation, with a
compacted layer of at least six inches of suitable cover or as
specified by the division.
(b) Areas which will not have additional wastes placed on them for
12 months or more shall be covered with a minimum of one foot
of intermediate cover.
— (c) After final termination of disposal operations at the site or a
major part thereof or upon revocation of a permit, the area shall
be covered with at least two feet of suitable compacted earth.
(4) EROSION CONTROL REQUIREMENTS
(a) Adequate erosion control measures shall be practiced to pre-
vent silt from leaving the site.
(b) Adequate erosion control measures shall be practiced to pre-
vent excessive on -site erosion.
(5) DRAINAGE CONTROL REQUIREMENTS
(a) Surface water shall be diverted from the operational area.
— (b) Surface water shall not be impounded over or in waste.
(c) Completed areas shall be adequately sloped to allow surface
water runoff in a controlled manner.
(6) VEGETATION REQUIREMENTS
(a) Within six months after final termination of disposal operations
at the site on a major part thereof or upon revocation of a
permit, the area shall be stabilized with native grasses.
(b) Temporary seeding will be utilized as necessary to stabilize the
site.
(7) WATER PROTECTION REQUIREMENTS
(a) The separation distance of four (4) feet between waste and
water table shall be maintained unless otherwise specified by
the division in the permit.
(b) Solid waste shall not be disposed of in water.
— (c) Leachate shall be contained on site or properly treated prior to
discharge. An NPDES permit may be required prior to the dis-
charge of leachate to surface waters.
(8) ACCESS AND SECURITY REQUIREMENTS
— (a) The site shall be adequately secured by means of gates, chains,
berms, fences, and other security measures approved by the
division, to prevent unauthorized entry.
— (b) An attendant shall be on duty at the site at all times while it is
open for public use to ensure compliance with operational
requirements.
(c) The access road to the site shall be of all-weather construction
and maintained in good condition.
— (d) Dust control measures shall be implemented where necessary.
REMARKS
DATE:
t
NAME:
(9) SIGN REQUIREMENTS
— (a) Signs providing information on dumping procedures, the hours
during which the site is open for public use, the permit number
and other pertinent information shall be posted at the site
entrance.
— (b) Signs shall be posted stating that no hazardous or liquid waste
can be received without written permission from the division.
(c) Traffic signs or markers shall be provided as necessary to pro-
mote an orderly traffic pattern to and from the discharge area
and to maintain efficient operating conditions.
(10) SAFETY REQUIREMENTS
— (a) Open burning of solid waste is prohibited.
(b) Equipment shall be provided to control accidental fires or
arrangements shall be made with the local fire protection
agency to immediately provide fire -fighting services when
needed.
(c) Fires that occur at a sanitary landfill shall be reported to the
division within 24 hours and a written notification shall be
submitted within 15 days.
— (d) The removal of solid waste from a sanitary landfill is prohibited
unless the owner/operator approves and the removal is not
performed on the working face.
— (e) Barrels and drums shall not be disposed of unless they are empty
and perforated sufficiently to ensure that no liquid or hazard-
ous waste is contained therein.
(11) WASTE ACCEPTANCE AND DISPOSAL REQUIREMENTS
(a) A site shall only accept those solid wastes which it is permitted to
receive.
— (b) No hazardous, liquid, or infectious waste shall be accepted or
disposed of in a sanitary landfill except as may be approved by
the division.
(c) Spoiled foods, animal carcasses, abattoir waste, hatchery waste,
and other animal waste delivered to the disposal site shall be
covered immediately.
(d) Asbestos waste that is packaged in accordance with 40 CFR 61, as
amended through January 1,1985, may be disposed of separate
and apart from other solid wastes at the bottom of the working
face or in an area not contiguous with other disposal areas, in
either case, in virgin soil. Separate areas shall be clearly marked
so that asbestos is not exposed by future land -disturbing activi-
ties. The waste shall be covered immediately with soil in a
manner that will not cause airborne conditions. Copies of 40
CFR 61 may be obtained and inspected at the Solid and Hazard-
ous Waste Management Branch, Division of Health Services,
P. O. Box 2091, Raleigh, NC, 27602.
(12) MISCELLANEOUS REQUIREMENTS
— (a) Effective vector control measures shall be applied to control
flies, rodents, and other insects or vermin when necessary.
— (b) Appropriate methods such as fencing and diking shall be pro-
vided within the area to confine solid waste subject to be blown
by the wind. At the conclusion of each day of operation, all
windblown material resulting from the operation shall be col-
lected and returned to the area by the owner or operator.
Solid and Hazardous Waste Management Branch
DHS 1709 (Revised 4/85)
Solid & Hazardous Waste Management Branch (Review 4/86) (white — Raleigh Office yellow — Facility green — Preparer)

4.C. DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOUR 3
WEATHER CONDITIONS DIVISION OF HEALTH SERVICES
INSPECTION FOR SANITARY LANDFILLS
PERMIT NUMMIR
NAME OF SITE COUNTY
LOCATION SIGNATURE OF PERSON(S) RECEIVING REPORT
SIR: AN INSPECTION OF YOUR LAND DISPOSAL SITE HAS BEEN MADE THIS DATE AND YOU ARE NOTIFIED OF THE VIOLATIONS, IF ANY, MARKED BELOW
WITH A CROSS (X).
(1) PLAN AND PERMIT REQUIREMENTS
— (a) Construction plans shall be approved and followed.
— (b) Specified monitoring and reporting requirements shall be met.
(2) SPREADING AND COMPACTING REQUIREMENTS
— (a) Solid waste shall be restricted into the smallest area feasible.
— (b) Solid waste shall be compacted as densely as practical into cells.
(3) COVER REQUIREMENTS
(a) Solid waste shall be covered after each day of operation, with a
compacted layer of at least six inches of suitable cover or as
specified by the division.
(b) Areas which will not have additional wastes placed on them for
12 months or more shall be covered with a minimum of one foot
of intermediate cover.
(c) After final termination of disposal operations at the site or a
major part thereof or upon revocation of a permit, the area shall
be covered with at least two feet of suitable compacted earth.
(4) EROSION CONTROL REQUIREMENTS
(a) Adequate erosion control measures shall be practiced to pre-
vent silt from leaving the site.
(b) Adequate erosion control measures shall be practiced to pre-
vent excessive on -site erosion.:-
(5) DRAINAGE CONTROL REQUIREMENTS
— (a) Surface water shall be diverted from the operational area.
— (b) Surface water shall not be impounded over or in waste.
— (c) Completed areas shall be adequately sloped to allow surface
waterrunoff in a controlled manner.
(6) VEGETATION REQUIREMENTS
—(a) Within six months after final termination of disposal operations
at the site on a major part thereof or upon revocation of a
permit, the area shall be stabilized with native grasses.
(b) Temporary seeding will be utilized as necessary to stabilize the
site.
(7) WATER PROTECTION REQUIREMENTS
— (a) The separation distance of four (4) feet between waste and
watertable shall be maintained unless otherwise specified by
the division in the permit.
— (b) Solidwaste shall not be disposed of in water.
— (c) Leachate shall be contained on site or properly treated prior to
discharge. An NPDES permit may be required prior to the dis-
charge of leachate to surface waters.
(8) ACCESS AND SECURITY REQUIREMENTS
— (a) The site shall be adequately secured by means of gates, chains,
berms, fences, and other security measures approved by the
division, to prevent unauthorized entry.
— (b) An attendant shall be on duty at the site at all times while it is
openfor public use to ensure compliance with operational
requ iiements.
— (c) The access road to the site shall be of all-weather construction
and rraintained in good condition.
— (d) Dust control measures shall be implemented where necessary.
REMARKS: —
'ATE
(9) SIGN REQUIREMENTS
— (a) Signs providing information on dumping procedures, the hours
during which the site is open for public use, the permit number
and other pertinent information shall be posted at the site
entrance.
— (b) Signs shall be posted stating that no hazardous or liquid waste
can be received without written permission from the division.
(c) Traffic signs or markers shall be provided as necessary to pro-
mote an orderly traffic pattern to and from the discharge area
and to maintain efficient operating conditions.
(10) SAFETY REQUIREMENTS
— (a) Open burning of solid waste is prohibited.
(b) Equipment shall be provided to control accidental fires or
arrangements shall be made with the local fire protection
agency to immediately provide fire -fighting services when
needed.
— (c) Fires that occur at a sanitary landfill shall be reported to the
division within 24 hours and a written notification shall be
submitted within 15 days.
— (d) The removal of solid waste from a sanitary landfill is prohibited
unless the owner/operator approves and the removal is not
performed on the working face.
— (e) Barrels and drums shall not be disposed of unless they are empty
and perforated sufficiently to ensure that no liquid or hazard-
ous waste is contained therein.
(11) WASTE ACCEPTANCE AND DISPOSAL REQUIREMENTS
— (a) A site shall only accept those solid wastes which it is permitted to
receive.
(b) No hazardous, liquid, or infectious waste shall be accepted or
disposed of in a sanitary landfill except as may be approved by
the division.
(c) Spoiled foods, animal carcasses, abattoir waste, hatchery waste,
and other animal waste delivered to the disposal site shall be
covered immediately.
— (d) Asbestos waste that is packaged in accordance with 40 CFR 61, as
amended through January 1,1985, may be disposed of separate
and apart from other solid wastes at the bottom of the working
face or in an area not contiguous with other disposal areas, in
either case, in virgin soil. Separate areas shall be clearly marked
so that asbestos is not exposed by future land -disturbing activi-
ties. The waste shall be covered immediately with soil in a
manner that will not cause airborne conditions. Copies of 40
CFR 61 may be obtained and inspected at the Solid and Hazard-
ous Waste Management Branch, Division of Health Services,
P. O. Box 2091, Raleigh, NC, 27602.
(12) MISCELLANEOUS REQUIREMENTS
(a) Effective vector control measures shall be applied to control
flies, rodents, and other insects or vermin when necessary.
(b) Appropriate methods such as fencing and diking shall be pro-
vided within the area to confine solid waste subject to be blown
by the wind. At the conclusion of each day of operation, all
windblown material resulting from the operation shall be col-
lected and returned to the area by the owner or operator.
NAME:
Solid and Hazardous Waste Management Branch
'09 (Revised 4/85)
4azardous Wast,Management Branch (Review 4/86) (white — Raleigh Office yellow — Facility green — Preparer)

Canton Mill
Box C-10
Canton, North Carolina 28716
V Champion
V Champion International Corporation
August 30, 1990
Mr. Bill Stamey
Town Manager
P.O.Box 987
Canton, North Carolina 28716
Dear Mr. Stamey:
Attached is the information you requested concerning
excavated soil at Champion International Corporation's
Canton Mill. The information includes the State of North
Carolina Procedure and Criteria for Waste Determination
form, Law Engineering laboratory test data reports, and
paint filter test results. Attachment I is the Waste
Determination Form requested by Mr. Jim Patterson to be
sent to Mr. Bill Hocutt both with the North Carolina Solid
Waste Management Division.
As you know, Champion conducted extensive testing of this
material prior to transport to the Canton landfill. The
following details summarize this assessment. Figure 1 is a
site location map of Champion's Canton Mill. The
excavation zone measures approximately 360 feet by 108 feet
in area. Ten test pits were excavated in randomly
distributed locations across the area as shown in Figure 2.
A backhoe was used to excavate the test pits. The backhoe
was steam cleaned prior to performing each excavation to
prevent cross -contamination between sampling locations.
Law Engineering sampled the soil on June 28, 1990. Soil
samples P-1 through P-10 were collected_in 4-ounce plastic
and 8-ounce glass jars with teflon lids. Sample containers
were prepared from the laboratory and certified sterile.
The soil samples were identifyied and shipped overnight in
an insulated cooler to Law Environmental National
Laboratories in Kennesaw, Georgia for analysis.

Champion International Corporation
Mr. Bill Stamey
August 31, 1990
Page 2
In the Laboratory, all the soil samples were extracted by
the Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure (TCLP).
Attachment II includes the test data reports for sample
points P-1 through P-10. Samples P-1 through P-10 were
analyzed for the 8 TCLP metals (Ar, Ba, Cd, Cr, Pb, Hg, Se,
Ag) and pH (EPA Method 9045). Additionally, samples
extracts P-4 and P-8 were analyzed for the characteristics
of TCLP toxicity, corrosivity, ignitability and reactivity.
The TCLP toxicity analysis includes the 8 selected metals,
pesticides (EPA Method 8080), herbicides (EPA Method 8150),
volatile organic compounds (EPA Method 8240) and acid
extractable and base neutral semi -volatile organic
compounds (EPA Method 8270).
A summary of the soil sample chemical analysis are listed
in Table 1. Only those parameters which were detected by
laboratory analysis are listed. Concentrations of barium,
lead, and methyl ethly ketone were detected in various soil
samples. This analysis indicates the soils are not
classified hazardous based on criteria established by EPA
or the State of North Carolina for the characterization of
a hazardous waste by the TCLP.
The soil does not exhibit the characteristic of corrosivity
because the representative soil pH (EPA Method 9045) is
10.9 and not aqueous or liquid. The representative soil
sample pH of 10.9 is far below the corrosivity limit of
12.5. In addition, the soil does not exhibit the
characteristics of ignitability or reactivity.
Attachment III is paint filter test results (Method 9095).
The paint filter tests were performed by Law Engineering on
August 28 and 29, 1990. The paint filter test results were
used to further confirm that no free liquids were present
in representative samples of the excavated material. If
free liquids were detected, the excavated soil would be
dried on -site beforee transport to the sanitary landfill.
If you have any questions or need additional information
please contact me at 646-2252.
A*V—;,
Derric Brown
Environmental Coordinator
Canton Modernization Project
attachments

Copy: Ms. Carolyn Merritt
Manager Solid Waste Programs
Champion International Corporation
One Champion Plaza
Stamford, Connecticut 06921
Mr. Bill Hocutt
Solid Waste Management Division
Solid Waste Section
P.O. Box 27687
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687

2783� �.
�/�`�%� � � � �. '' � - � ,�( II °�'' •�rtn��e46nsoF; `/ ,'c I . •ri l' � � 1 \ = i
�� ) ; / �/ n• 1,4
C an
�/
Patiom S : g'`
�.. •� ;l�/ . 1 it � N I ' � ,�, 1 � ! � .II,'
• ' �I' i lip �' '\� � .+` �G- .--_ � 4�^ • . l\ ���� II
•�, '' .ill �: � •\ , ',' �`
��� Imo\ �(�<%� �, � - �������'�,\ � nia Ave/�1 i ;-�• ' \ °� ;l ) �� !�
�A fief �- ', I
Swi mi po11.\� \ , .♦ ii, ( '� C.
no :�•_ .� ___ \.y�, �,�— �N, � • O\ 1�
\ BMLK175 pisgAjlSchbil
v
2.
mi
V It
Pl t �rIh \ � . <`� i f � •i/ r �. — V -- i C� \4• `.,9 '� a '.�.
wil
♦ •♦� �� �� /� 1 ��.41',1. --34I_ orgiu
\ / G
�' ° I 1 ♦ _` II a /,tn/ / < �� �% ��l - FiMers Lao
=L= l l z760 1 \ ..\j
avwood'ltheial Ch %;tr�iT �f�. i n . SumryPti+dt i �0 • f�P��� --y_", \. �l\L %1
LAW ENGINEERING
REFERENCE: GREENVILLE, SOUTH CAROLINA
USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP, CANTON, N.C.
QUADRANGLE, 7.5 MINUTE SERIES, DATED 1967.
SITE LOCATION MAP
APPROXIMATE SCALE: 1" = 20001 CHAMPION INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION
THE PRINT MACHINE,INC. N38036

19 Rti
w4
.:........
000 _
Go o P-1 P-3 O
na O O P-6 P-10 P-7
P-2 O O
P-4 P-5
F O
�et Q P-9 Q F FLOOR
o
O 79C
O �•
\ 79A O O�
000
3,6s � o
LEGEND �ti1 O
O SAMPLE LOCATION
F NO.2 FIBER LINE SCALE: 1" = 100'
H DIOXIDE TOWER GF
REFERENCE: SOIL SA
PHOTOCOPIED FROM "MASTER MILL PLOT PLAN, CHAN
CONCENTRATED NCG PROJECT", DRAWING NO.
100-A-001-A, PROVIDED BY CRS SIRRINE, DATED
4/19/90. JOB NO. AVE-
THE PRINT MACHINE,INC. N38036

z
_O
w F-
It
to
<
O
M
(O
0)cc
Q
cc F-
r
O
O
O
00
O
W Z
r
O to
O
QLU 0
v V
A
z
O
0
ld
OC
N
L
c
O r
to
O
-
Q W
N
00
O
lU
O
J>
O
to
O
r
O to
IT
3
cf
C7J
CM
VI
VI
T
U
w
U
ac
•-
O
L
++
L.
c
++
0
U
—
L
00
—
+1
O
I O
F- F-
F-
L
to
-
z
I r
0
0
F-
r
z z
z
N
3
-
I a
z
z
z
r
++
m
c
I
tv
L
W
O
1
V
L
O
41
tU
++
1
F- F-
F-
t(f
E
-
c
c
1 0
0
0
O
z z
z
L
-
w
I IL
z
z
N
J
U
I
z
O
N
1
T
it
L
I
I
N
O O
O
+1
++
N
I
O to
O
-
c
Q
c
I 00
0
0
M
r
to N
N
U
O
r- -
-
O
l a
z
z
r
v v
A
-
U
N
LL
-
I
r
x
L
O T
++
I
O
N
- -
N
m
I
v
41
a
ItS
L.
F- F-
(a c
O
I t`
0
F-
z z
z
tL
O
F- Q
O
Q
I OL
O
z
z
0)
J
to
z
L
I
U
-
O
1
F-
L
I
U
N
r
()
I
F- F-
F-
N
-
0)
-
z
1 (0
0
F-
N
z z
z
L
3
E
t)
A
O
1 IL
z
M
z
r
++
N
-
c
-
1
N
L
Q.
O
F-
1
L
++
U
E
-
Q
I
to
O
w
++
0
1
LD
F- F-
F-
w
tv
In
tC
O
1 to
0
F-
N
z z
z
3
c
J
I tL
I-
z
z
r
Q
-
L
I
a
w
-
N
I
w
:1
O
++
I
O
O
N
c
I
to
to
O O
O
N
O
-
I
0
O to
O
L
I d
O
z
0
00
to N
N
++
a
z
v V
A
co
O
I
T
-
I
to
v
n
O
a
I
t`
F- F-
F-
+•0
E
I M
0
F-
r
z z
z
to
I CL
O
z
z
r
tV
W
L
I
L
N
U
I
N
-
I
F- F-
F-
-
Q
I N
0
0
F-
r
z z
z
L
Q.
1 a
z
z
z
r
(o
R
1
41
I
O
N
r
I r
0
F-
z z
z
-
N
1 a
r
z
z
u.
>
a�
O
N
T
a +1
..
O
41 N
++
(A ++
E
T Q.
T
++
L
M
N 4)
a
L Q.
+a N
T
-
O
-
F- 0
tr
Q
E
41 ..
.- +.,
+j
-
+..
:1
w
.
Q.
0
> •-
•- N N
-
m
0)
++ +
F-
Q.
N
- c
» •O
a
N
O O
w
E
..
- c
:I
•- •- •-
(c
:
L
z z
:3
T O
O
+J v- c
++
v)
Q
-
'r7
L +1
L x
U- (o
-
N
2
II II
cc
L
tC
++ Gi
L Q,
td = T
c
cr
a
Q
co
N
tU NC
O
000
O
F- 0
d
m
J
m
U
CC
-
r
N
z z

ATTACHMENT I
PROCEDURE AND CRITERIA FOR WASTE DETERMINATION

y STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT, HEALTH AND'NATURAL RESOURCES
SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT DIVISION
SOLID WASTE SECTION
PROCEDURE AND CRITERIA FOR WASTE DETEBMINATION
This procedure will be used by the Solid Waste Management
Division to determine whether a waste is (1) hazardous as defined try
10 NCAC 10F, and (2) suitable for disposal at a solid waste
management facility.
The types of -wastes that will be evaluated by this procedure are
primarily, but not exclusively, industrial and commercial wastes and
sludges, and Publicly Owned Treatment Works Sludges.
The Solid Waste Management Division reserves the right to
request additional information or waive some of the requirements
based on the type of waste if it deems necessary. The Division may
also require some wastes to be treated or altered to render the
wastes environmentally immobile prior to disposal at a sanitary
landfill. Wastes disposed at sanitary landfills must be non -liquid
which can be properly managed in accordance with the "Solid Waste
Management Rules". APPROVAL TO DISPOSE OF THE WASTE SHALL ALSO BE
OBTAINED FROM THE OWNER OR OPERATOR OF THE LANDFILL PRIOR TO
DISPOSAL.
The following information is required for an evaluation.
Incomplete waste determination forms will be returned to the
generator without review. An asterisk(*) denotes information
required for Publicly Owned Treatment Works.
A * GENERAL INFORMATION
1. Name, telephone number and mailing address of facility or person
generating waste Champion International Corportion,
[phone], MainStrPPt, PO Boxr-ln, Canton, NC 2R71A
2. Specific location of waste (i.e. SR. #, county, city, etc...)
Champion International Corporation_ Haywood county, cantnn No.
3. What is the waste? Excavated soil materials containing rPinfnrrPd
Concrete wood, and pipes.
4. What volume of disposal will there be? Approximately 15-onn r,ihic yd
5. What frequency of disposal will there be?Daily/4-10hour days/6 wksl
6. Explain either the manufacturing process or how the waste was
generated.The zone has been excavated for construction of a new
fiber line building and several tank structures.
B INFORMATION FOR HAZARDOUS (RCRA) DETERMINATION (10 NCAC 1OF .0029)
1. Is the waste listed under .0029(e) (i.e., 40 CPR 261.31 -
261.33)? If yes, list number. No
*2. Does the waste exhibit any of the four characteristics as
defined by .0029(d) (i.e., 40 CFR 261.21-261.24)? (Attach
laboratory results for EP Toxicity, Reactivity, Ignitability,
Corrosivity.) No

ATTACHMENT II
LAW ENVIRONMENTAL NATIONAL LABORATORIES
TEST DATA REPORT

LAW ENVIRONMENTAL NATIONAL LABORATORIES
TEST DATA REPORT
Date 07/13/90
Page 1
Lab Number : 90-6335-01
Project No. : AVE-2620
Project Name : CHAMPION
Manager: GEORGE MAALOUF
Station ID :
P-1
Matrix :
SO
Type :
GRAB
Collector :
DCH
Remarks :
--- Project Information ---
Cust. No. .
--- Sample Information ---
Sampled Date/Time 06/28/90 11:45
Received Date/Time 06/30/90 13:50
Received From/By DCH/GP
Chain of Custody 8604
Number of Containers 1
--- Test Data ---
Parameter .............................. Method.... Units PQL....... Results... Test Date Analy
-- INORGANIC CHEMISTRY RESULTS --
pH EPA 9040 units 2-12 9.7 07/09/90 GW
-- METALS ANALYSIS
- METALS PREP RESULTS --
Arsenic, TCLP
EPA
7060
mg/1
0.1
ND
07/10/90
DE
Barium, TCLP
EPA
6010
mg/1
0.5
1.0
07/10/90
DE
Cadmium, TCLP
EPA
7130
mg/l
0.1
ND
07/12/90
DE
Chromium, TCLP
EPA
7191
mg/l
0.005
ND
07/12/90
DE
Lead, TCLP
EPA
7420
mg/l
0.5
ND
07/11/90
KE
Mercury, TCLP
EPA
7470
mg/1
0.1
ND
07/12/90
HH
Selenium, TCLP
EPA
7740
mg/1
0.1
ND
07/10/90
DE
Silver, TCLP
EPA
7760
mg/l
0.5
ND
07/11/90
KE
--- SERIES 35000
Total Metals Prep:
Aqueous ICP
EPA
3010
N/A
07/09/90
HH
Total Metals Prep:
Aqueous AA Flame
EPA
3010
N/A
07/09/90
HH
Total Metals Prep:
Aqueous Furnace
EPA
3020
N/A
07/09/90
HH
Total Metals Prep:
Aqueous, Hg
EPA
7470
N/A
07/11/90
HH
TCLP EXTRACTION
EPA
1311
N/A
07/05/90
HH
Signed �-

LAW ENVIRONMENTAL NATIONAL LABORATORIES
TEST DATA REPORT
Date 07/13/90
Page 1
Lab Number 90-6335-02
Project No. AVE-2620
Project Name CHAMPION
Manager: GEORGE MAALOUF
Station ID : P-2
Matrix : SO
Type : GRAB
Collector : DCH
Remarks :
--- Project Information ---
Cust. No. .
--- Sample Information ---
Sampled Date/Time 06/28/90 13:10
Received Date/Time 06/30/90 13:50
Received From/By DCH/GP
Chain of Custody 8604
Number of Containers 1
--- Test Data ---
Parameter .............................. Method.... Units PQL....... Results... Test Date Analy
-- INORGANIC CHEMISTRY RESULTS --
pH EPA 9040 units 2-12 11.4 07/09/90 GW
-- METALS ANALYSIS
- METALS PREP RESULTS --
Arsenic, TCLP
EPA
7060
mg/1
0.1
ND
07/10/90
DE
Barium, TCLP
EPA
6010
mg/l
0.5
ND
07/10/90
DE
Cadmium, TCLP
EPA
7130
mg/l
0.1
ND
07/12/90
DE
Chromium, TCLP
EPA
7191
mg/l
0.005
ND
07/12/90
DE
Lead, TCLP
EPA
7420
mg/1
0.5
ND
07/11/90
KE
Mercury, TCLP
EPA
7470
mg/l
0.1
ND
07/12/90
HH
Selenium, TCLP
EPA
7740
mg/1
0.1
ND
07/10/90
DE
Silver, TCLP
EPA
7760
mg/l
0.5
ND
07/11/90
KE
--- SERIES 35000
Total Metals Prep:
Aqueous ICP
EPA
3010
N/A
07/09/90
HH
Total Metals Prep:
Aqueous AA Flame
EPA
3010
N/A
07/09/90
HH
Total Metals Prep:
Aqueous Furnace
EPA
3020
N/A
07/09/90
HH
Total Metals Prep:
Aqueous, Hg
EPA
7470
N/A
07/11/90
HH
TCLP EXTRACTION
EPA
1311
N/A
07/05/90
HH
Signed

LAW ENVIRONMENTAL NATIONAL LABORATORIES
TEST DATA REPORT
Date 07/13/90
Page 1
Lab Number 90-6335-03
Project No. AVE-2620
Project Name CHAMPION
Manager: GEORGE MAALOUF
Station ID P-3
Matrix SO
Type GRAB
Collector : DCH
Remarks :
--- Project Information ---
Cust. No. .
--- Sample Information ---
Sampled Date/Time : 06/28/90 13:45
Received Date/Time : 06/30/90 13:50
Received From/By : DCH/GP
Chain of Custody : 8604
Number of Containers : 1
--- Test Data ---
Parameter .............................. Method.... Units PQL....... Results... Test Date Analy
-- INORGANIC CHEMISTRY RESULTS --
pH EPA 9040 units 2-12 11.4 07/09/90 GW
-- METALS ANALYSIS
- METALS PREP RESULTS --
Arsenic, TCLP
EPA
7060
mg/l
0.1
ND
07/10/90
DE
Barium, TCLP
EPA
6010
mg/l
0.5
0.75
07/10/90
DE
Cadmium, TCLP
EPA
7130
mg/l
0.1
ND
07/12/90
DE
Chromium, TCLP
EPA
7191
mg/l
0.005
ND
07/12/90
DE
Lead, TCLP
EPA
7420
mg/1
0.5
ND
07/11/90
KE
Mercury, TCLP
EPA
7470
mg/l
0.1
ND
07/12/90
HH
Selenium, TCLP
EPA
7740
mg/l
0.1
ND
07/10/90
DE
Silver, TCLP
EPA
7760
mg/l
0.5
ND
07/11/90
KE
--- SERIES 35000
Total Metals Prep:
Aqueous ICP
EPA
3010
N/A
07/09/90
HH
Total Metals Prep:
Aqueous AA Flame
EPA
3010
N/A
07/09/90
HH
Total Metals Prep:
Aqueous Furnace
EPA
3020
N/A
07/09/90
HH
Total Metals Prep:
Aqueous, Hg
EPA
7470
N/A
07/11/90
HH
TCLP EXTRACTION
EPA
1311
N/A
07/05/90
HH
Signed

LAW ENVIRONMENTAL NATIONAL LABORATORIES
TEST DATA REPORT
Date 07/13/90
Page 1
Lab Number 90-6335-04
Project No. AVE-2620
Project Name CHAMPION
Manager: GEORGE MAALOUF
Station ID
: P-4
Matrix :
SO
Type :
COMP
Collector :
DCH
--- Project Information ---
Cust. No. .
--- Sample Information ---
Sampled Date/Time : 06/28/90 14:10
Received Date/Time : 06/30/90 13:50
Received From/By : DCH/GP
Chain of Custody : 8604
Number of Containers : 3
Remarks : ALL ORGANIC ANALYSES PERFORMED ON TCLP EXTRACT.
--- Test Data ---
Parameter .............................. Method.... Units PQL....... Results... Test Date Analy
-- INORGANIC CHEMISTRY RESULTS --
Sulfide, Total Releasable SW 846-I mg/l 500 ND 07/05/90 GW
Cyanide, Total Releasable (HCN) SW 846-I mg/kg 250 ND 07/05/90 GW
Corrosivity (pH) SW 846 units 2-12 8.9 07/03/90 GW
Ignitability (Flash Point) EPA 1010 F 75 >200 07/03/90 GW
-- METALS ANALYSIS - METALS PREP RESULTS --
Arsenic, TCLP EPA 7060 mg/1 0.1 ND 07/10/90 DE
Barium, TCLP EPA 6010 mg/1 0.5 0.59 07/11/90 DE
Cadmium, TCLP EPA 7130 mg/l 0.1 ND 07/12/90 DE
Chromium, TCLP EPA 7191 mg/l 0.005 ND 07/12/90 DE
Lead, TCLP EPA 7420 mg/l 0.5 ND 07/11/90 KE
Mercury, TCLP EPA 7470 mg/1 0.1 ND 07/12/90 HH
Selenium, TCLP EPA 7740 mg/l 0.1 ND 07/10/90 DE
Silver, TCLP EPA 7760 mg/l 0.5 ND 07/11/90 KE
--- SERIES 35000
Total Metals Prep: Aqueous ICP EPA 3010 N/A 07/09/90 HH
Total Metals Prep: Aqueous AA Flame EPA 3010 N/A 07/09/90 HH
Total Metals Prep: Aqueous Furnace EPA 3020 N/A 07/09/90 HH
Total Metals Prep: Aqueous, Hg EPA 7470 N/A 07/11/90 HH
TCLP EXTRACTION EPA 1311 N/A 07/05/90 HH
-- ORGANIC PREP RESULTS --
Ext/TCLP-Acid Extractable FR 51-114 N/A 07/04/90 CSH
Ext/TCLP-Base Neutral Extractable FR 51-114 N/A 07/04/90 CSH
Ext/TCLP/Herb FR 51-114 N/A 07/04/90 CSH
Ext/TCLP/Pest FR 51-114 N/A 07/04/90 CSH
Ext/Acid/Leachate 3510/8270 N/A 07/07/90 CSH
Signed

LAW ENVIRONMENTAL NATIONAL LABORATORIES
TEST DATA REPORT
Date 07/13/90
Page 2
Lab Number : 90-6335-04
Project No. : AVE-2620
--- Test Data ---
Parameter .............................. Method.... Units PQL....... Results... Test Date Analy
-- ORGANIC PREP RESULTS --
Ext/Base Neutral/Leachate
3510/8270
N/A
07/07/90
CSH
Ext/Herbicides/Leachate
EPA
8150
N/A
07/09/90
CSH
Ext/Pest/Leachate
3510/8080
N/A
07/09/90
CSH
-- GC ORGANIC ANALYSIS RESULTS --
gamma-BHC (Lindane)
EPA
8080
ug/1
0.05
ND
07/11/90
PAB
Heptachlor
EPA
8080
ug/l
0.05
ND
07/11/90
PAB
Endrin
EPA
8080
ug/1
0.10
ND
07/11/90
PAB
Methoxychlor
EPA
8080
ug/l
0.50
ND
07/11/90
PAB
Toxaphene
EPA
8080
ug/l
1.0
ND
07/11/90
PAB
Chlordane
EPA
8080
ug/l
0.5
ND
07/11/90
PAB
--- SERIES 57000
2,4,5-TP (Silvex)
EPA
8150
ug/l
0.10
ND
07/11/90
PAB
2,4-D
EPA
8150
ug/l
0.20
ND
07/11/90
PAB
--- SERIES 63000
Vinyl chloride
EPA
8240
ug/l
10
ND
07/09/90
PG
1,1-Dichloroethene
EPA
8240
ug/l
5
ND
07/09/90
PG
Chloroform
EPA
8240
ug/1
5
ND
07/09/90
PG
Carbon tetrachloride
EPA
8240
ug/1
5
ND
07/09/90
PG
Trichloroethene
EPA
8240
ug/l
5
ND
07/09/90
PG
Benzene
EPA
8240
ug/l
5
ND
07/09/90
PG
Tetrachloroethene
EPA
8240
ug/l
5
ND
07/09/90
PG
Chlorobenzene
EPA
8240
ug/l
5
ND
07/09/90
PG
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
EPA
8240
ug/l
5
ND
07/09/90
PG
Methyl ethyl Ketone
EPA
8240
ug/1
100
ND
07/09/90
PG
1,2-Dichloroethane
EPA
8240
ug/l
5
ND
07/09/90
PG
-- GC/MS ORGANIC ANALYSIS (A) RESULTS
--
2-Methylphenol
EPA
8270
ug/1
10
ND
07/13/90
ZG
4-Methylphenol
EPA
8270
ug/1
10
ND
07/13/90
ZG
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
EPA
8270
ug/l
10
ND
07/13/90
ZG
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
EPA
8270
ug/l
10
ND
07/13/90
ZG
Pentachlorophenol
EPA
8270
ug/1
50
ND
07/13/90
ZG
3-Methylphenol
EPA
8270
ug/l
10
ND
07/13/90
ZG
Hexachloroethane
EPA
8270
ug/l
10
ND
07/13/90
ZG
Nitrobenzene
EPA
8270
ug/l
10
ND
07/13/90
ZG
Hexachlorobutadiene
EPA
8270
ug/l
10
ND
07/13/90
ZG
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
EPA
8270
ug/l
10
ND
07/13/90
ZG
Hexachlorobenzene
EPA
8270
ug/l
10
ND
07/13/90
ZG
Pyridine
EPA
8270
ug/l
10
ND
07/13/90
ZG
-- Ext/Zero Headspace, TCLP RESULTS --
Ext/Zero Headspace, TCLP
N/A 07/05/90 RB
Signed ��'"' 616� - -

LAW ENVIRONMENTAL NATIONAL LABORATORIES
TEST DATA REPORT
Date 07/13/90
Page 1
Lab Number 90-6335-05
Project No. AVE2620
Project Name CHAMPION
Manager: GEORGE MAALOUF
Station ID P-5
Matrix SO
Type GRAB
Collector DCH
Remarks :
--- Project Information ---
Cust. No. .
--- Sample Information ---
Sampled Date/Time 06/28/90 15:00
Received Date/Time 06/30/90 13:50
Received From/By DCH/GP
Chain of Custody 8604
Number of Containers 1
--- Test Data ---
Parameter .............................. Method.... Units PQL....... Results... Test Date Analy
-- INORGANIC CHEMISTRY RESULTS --
pH
EPA
9040
units
2-12
12.5
07/09/90
GW
-- METALS ANALYSIS
- METALS PREP RESULTS
--
Arsenic, TCLP
EPA
7060
mg/1
0.1
ND
07/10/90
DE
Barium, TCLP
EPA
6010
mg/l
0.5
7.5
07/11/90
DE
Cadmium, TCLP
EPA
7130
mg/1
0.1
ND
07/12/90
DE
Chromium, TCLP
EPA
7191
mg/l
0.005
ND
07/12/90
DE
Lead, TCLP
EPA
7420
mg/1
0.5
ND
07/11/90
KE
Mercury, TCLP
EPA
7470
mg/1
0.1
ND
07/12/90
HH
Selenium, TCLP
EPA
7740
mg/l
0.1
ND
07/10/90
DE
Silver, TCLP
EPA
7760
mg/1
0.5
ND
07/11/90
KE
--- SERIES 35000
Total Metals Prep:
Aqueous ICP
EPA
3010
N/A
07/09/90
HH
Total Metals Prep:
Aqueous AA Flame
EPA
3010
N/A
07/09/90
HH
Total Metals Prep:
Aqueous Furnace
EPA
3020
N/A
07/09/90
HH
Total Metals Prep:
Aqueous, Hg
EPA
7470
N/A
07/11/90
HH
TCLP EXTRACTION
EPA
1311
N/A
07/05/90
HH
Signed C /, `�

LAW ENVIRONMENTAL NATIONAL LABORATORIES
TEST DATA REPORT
Date 07/13/90
Page 1
Lab Number 90-6�19-nti
Project No. ATE-2620 _ _
Project Name CHAMPION
Manager: GEORGE MAALOUF
Station ID P-6
Matrix SO
Type GRAB
Collector DCH
Remarks :
--- Project Information ---
Cust. No. .
--- Sample Information ---
Sampled Date/Time 06/28/90 15:30
Received Date/Time 06/30/90 13:50
Received From/By DCH/GP
Chain of Custody 8604
Number of Containers 1
--- Test Data ---
Parameter .............................. Method.... Units PQL....... Results... Test Date Analy
-- INORGANIC CHEMISTRY RESULTS --
pH EPA 9040 units 2-12 12.2 07/09/90 GW
-- METALS ANALYSIS
- METALS PREP RESULTS --
Arsenic, TCLP
EPA
7060
mg/1
0.1
ND
07/10/90
DE
Barium, TCLP
EPA
6010
mg/l
0.5
ND
07/11/90
DE
Cadmium, TCLP
EPA
7130
mg/l
0.1
ND
07/12/90
DE
Chromium, TCLP
EPA
7191
mg/l
0.005
ND
07/12/90
DE
Lead, TCLP
EPA
7420
mg/1
0.5
3.4
07/11/90
KE
Mercury, TCLP
EPA
7470
mg/l
0.1
ND
07/12/90
HH
Selenium, TCLP
EPA
7740
mg/l
0.1
ND
07/10/90
DE
Silver, TCLP
EPA
7760
mg/1
0.5
ND
07/11/90
KE
--- SERIES 35000
Total Metals Prep:
Aqueous ICP
EPA
3010
N/A
07/09/90
HH
Total Metals Prep:
Aqueous AA Flame
EPA
3010
N/A
07/09/90
HH
Total Metals Prep:
Aqueous Furnace
EPA
3020
N/A
07/09/90
HH
Total Metals Prep:
Aqueous, Hg
EPA
7470
N/A
07/11/90
HH
TCLP EXTRACTION
EPA
1311
N/A
07/05/90
HH
Signed `'�/.

LAW ENVIRONMENTAL NATIONAL LABORATORIES
TEST DATA REPORT
Date 07/13/90
Page 1
Lab Number 90-6335-07
Project No. AVE-2620
Project Name CHAMPION
Manager: GEORGE MAALOUF
Station ID P-7
Matrix SO
Type GRAB
Collector DCH
Remarks :
--- Project Information ---
Cust. No. .
--- Sample Information ---
Sampled Date/Time : 06/28/90 15:50
Received Date/Time : 06/30/90 13:50
Received From/By : DCH/GP
Chain of Custody : 8604
Number of Containers : 1
--- Test Data ---
Parameter .............................. Method.... Units PQL....... Results... Test Date Analy
-- INORGANIC CHEMISTRY RESULTS --
pH EPA 9040 units 2-12 9.1 07/09/90 GW
-- METALS ANALYSIS
- METALS PREP RESULTS --
Arsenic, TCLP
EPA
7060
mg/1
0.1
ND
07/10/90
DE
Barium, TCLP
EPA
6010
mg/1
0.5
0.64
07/11/90
DE
Cadmium, TCLP
EPA
7130
mg/1
0.1
ND
07/12/90
DE
Chromium, TCLP
EPA
7191
mg/l
0.005
ND
07/12/90
DE
Lead, TCLP
EPA
7420
mg/1
0.5
ND
07/11/90
KE
Mercury, TCLP
EPA
7470
mg/1
0.1
ND
07/12/90
HH
Selenium, TCLP
EPA
7740
mg/1
0.1
ND
07/10/90
DE
Silver, TCLP
EPA
7760
mg/1
0.5
ND
07/11/90
KE
--- SERIES 35000
Total Metals Prep:
Aqueous ICP
EPA
3010
N/A
07/09/90
HH
Total Metals Prep:
Aqueous AA Flame
EPA
3010
N/A
07/09/90
HH
Total Metals Prep:
Aqueous Furnace
EPA
3020
N/A
07/09/90
HH
Total Metals Prep:
Aqueous, Hg
EPA
7470
N/A
07/11/90
HH
TCLP EXTRACTION
EPA
1311
N/A
07/05/90
HH
Signed �% '� 4�

LAW ENVIRONMENTAL NATIONAL LABORATORIES
TEST DATA REPORT
Date 07/13/90
Page 1
Lab Number : 90-6335-08
Project No. : AVE2620
Project Name : CHAMPION
Manager: GEORGE MAALOUF
Station ID : P-8
Matrix : SO
Type : GRAB
Collector : DCH
--- Project Information ---
Cust. No. .
--- Sample Information ---
Sampled Date/Time 06/28/90 16:20
Received Date/Time 06/30/90 13:50
Received From/By DCH/GP
Chain of Custody 8604
Number of Containers 3
Remarks : ALL ORGANIC ANALYSES PERFORMED ON TCLP EXTRACT.
--- Test Data ---
Parameter .............................. Method.... Units PQL....... Results... Test Date Analy
-- INORGANIC CHEMISTRY RESULTS --
Sulfide, Total Releasable
SW 846-I
mg/1
500
ND
07/05/90
GW
Cyanide, Total Releasable (HCN)
SW 846-I
mg/kg
250
ND
07/05/90
GW
Corrosivity (pH)
SW 846
units
2-12
11.2
07/03/90
GW
Ignitability (Flash Point)
EPA 1010
F
75
>200
07/03/90
GW
-- METALS ANALYSIS - METALS PREP RESULTS --
Arsenic, TCLP
EPA 7060
mg/l
0.1
ND
07/10/90
DE
Barium, TCLP
EPA 6010
mg/l
0.5
ND
07/11/90
DE
Cadmium, TCLP
EPA 7130
mg/1
0.1
ND
07/12/90
DE
Chromium, TCLP
EPA 7191
mg/l
0.005
ND
07/12/90
DE
Lead, TCLP
EPA 7420
mg/l
0.5
ND
07/11/90
KE
Mercury, TCLP
EPA 7470
mg/1
0.1
ND
07/12/90
HH
Selenium, TCLP
EPA 7740
mg/1
0.1
ND
07/10/90
DE
Silver, TCLP
EPA 7760
mg/1
0.5
ND
07/11/90
KE
--- SERIES 35000
Total Metals Prep: Aqueous ICP
EPA 3010
N/A
07/09/90
HH
Total Metals Prep: Aqueous AA Flame
EPA 3010
N/A
07/09/90
HH
Total Metals Prep: Aqueous Furnace
EPA 3020
N/A
07/09/90
HH
Total Metals Prep: Aqueous, Hg
EPA 7470
N/A
07/11/90
HH
TCLP EXTRACTION
EPA 1311
N/A
07/05/90
HH
-- ORGANIC PREP RESULTS --
Ext/TCLP-Acid Extractable
FR 51-114
N/A
07/04/90
CSH
Ext/TCLP-Base Neutral Extractable
FR 51-114
N/A
07/04/90
CSH
Ext/TCLP/Herb
FR 51-114
N/A
07/04/90
CSH
Ext/TCLP/Pest
FR 51-114
N/A
07/04/90
CSH
Ext/Acid/Leachate
3510/8270
N/A
07/07/90
CSH
Signed
Z7

LAW ENVIRONMENTAL NATIONAL LABORATORIES
TEST DATA REPORT
Date 07/13/90
Page 2
Lab Number : 90-6335-08
Project No. : AVE-2620
--- Test Data ---
Parameter .............................. Method.... Units PQL....... Results... Test Date Analy
-- ORGANIC PREP RESULTS --
Ext/Base Neutral/Leachate
3510/8270
N/A
07/07/90
CSH
Ext/Herbicides/Leachate
EPA
8150
N/A
07/09/90
CSH
Ext/Pest/Leachate
3510/8080
N/A
07/09/90
CSH
-- GC ORGANIC ANALYSIS RESULTS --
gamma-BHC (Lindane)
EPA
8080
ug/l
0.05
ND
07/11/90
PAB
Heptachlor
EPA
8080
ug/l
0.05
ND
07/11/90
PAB
Endrin
EPA
8080
ug/l
0.10
ND
07/11/90
PAB
Methoxychlor
EPA
8080
ug/l
0.50
ND
07/11/90
PAB
Toxaphene
EPA
8080
ug/l
1.0
ND
07/11/90
PAB
Chlordane
EPA
8080
ug/l
0.5
ND
07/11/90
PAB
--- SERIES 57000
2,4,5-TP (Silvex)
EPA
8150
ug/l
0.10
ND
07/11/90
PAB
2,4-D
EPA
8150
ug/l
0.20
ND
07/11/90
PAB
--- SERIES 63000
Vinyl chloride
EPA
8240
ug/l
50
ND
07/09/90
PG
1,1-Dichloroethene
EPA
8240
ug/l
25
ND
07/09/90
PG
Chloroform
EPA
8240
ug/1
25
ND
07/09/90
PG
Carbon tetrachloride
EPA
8240
ug/l
25
ND
07/09/90
PG
Trichloroethene
EPA
8240
ug/l
25
ND
07/09/90
PG
Benzene
EPA
8240
ug/l
25
ND
07/09/90
PG
Tetrachloroethene
EPA
8240
ug/l
25
ND
07/09/90
PG
Chlorobenzene
EPA
8240
ug/l
25
ND
07/09/90
PG
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
EPA
8240
ug/l
25
ND
07/09/90
PG
Methyl ethyl Ketone
EPA
8240
ug/l
1000
1300
07/10/90
PG
1,2-Dichloroethane
EPA
8240
ug/l
25
ND
07/10/90
PG
-- GC/MS ORGANIC ANALYSIS (A) RESULTS
--
2-Methylphenol
EPA
8270
ug/l
10
ND
07/13/90
ZG
4-Methylphenol
EPA
8270
ug/l
10
ND
07/13/90
ZG
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
EPA
8270
ug/l
10
ND
07/13/90
ZG
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
EPA
8270
ug/l
10
ND
07/13/90
ZG
Pentachlorophenol
EPA
8270
ug/l
50
ND
07/13/90
ZG
3-Methylphenol
EPA
8270
ug/1
10
ND
07/13/90
ZG
Hexachloroethane
EPA
8270
ug/l
10
ND
07/13/90
ZG
Nitrobenzene
EPA
8270
ug/1
10
ND
07/13/90
ZG
Hexachlorobutadiene
EPA
8270
ug/1
10
ND
07/13/90
ZG
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
EPA
8270
ug/l
10
ND
07/13/90
ZG
Hexachlorobenzene
EPA
8270
ug/l
10
ND
07/13/90
ZG
Pyridine
EPA
8270
ug/l
10
ND
07/13/90
ZG
-- Ext/Zero Headspace, TCLP RESULTS --
Ext/Zero Headspace, TCLP
N/A 07/05/90 RB
Signed'/lJ/ice l

LAW ENVIRONMENTAL NATIONAL LABORATORIES
TEST DATA REPORT
Date 07/13/90
Page 1
Lab Number : 90-6335-09
Project No. : AVE-2620
Project Name : CHAMPION
Manager: GEORGE MAALOUF
Station ID : P-9
Matrix : SO
Type : GRAB
Collector : DCH
Remarks :
--- Project Information ---
Cust. No. .
--- Sample Information ---
Sampled Date/Time 06/28/90 17:10
Received Date/Time 06/30/90 13:50
Received From/By : DCH/GP
Chain of Custody 8604
Number of Containers 1
--- Test Data ---
Parameter .............................. Method.... Units PQL....... Results... Test Date Analy
-- INORGANIC CHEMISTRY RESULTS --
pH EPA 9040 units 2-12 10.4 07/09/90 GW
-- METALS ANALYSIS
- METALS PREP RESULTS --
Arsenic, TCLP
EPA
7060
mg/1
0.1
ND
07/10/90
DE
Barium, TCLP
EPA
6010
mg/1
0.5
ND
07/11/90
DE
Cadmium, TCLP
EPA
7130
mg/l
0.1
ND
07/12/90
DE
Chromium, TCLP
EPA
7191
mg/1
0.005
ND
07/12/90
DE
Lead, TCLP
EPA
7420
mg/l
0.5
ND
07/11/90
KE
Mercury, TCLP
EPA
7470
mg/1
0.1
ND
07/12/90
HH
Selenium, TCLP
EPA
7740
mg/l
0.1
ND
07/10/90
DE
Silver, TCLP
EPA
7760
mg/l
0.5
ND
07/11/90
KE
--- SERIES 35000
Total Metals Prep:
Aqueous ICP
EPA
3010
N/A
07/09/90
HH
Total Metals Prep:
Aqueous AA Flame
EPA
3010
N/A
07/09/90
HH
Total Metals Prep:
Aqueous Furnace
EPA
3020
N/A
07/09/90
HH
Total Metals Prep:
Aqueous, Hg
EPA
7470
N/A
07/11/90
HH
TCLP EXTRACTION
EPA
1311
N/A
07/05/90
HH
Signed �/�

LAW ENVIRONMENTAL NATIONAL LABORATORIES
TEST DATA REPORT
Date 07/13/90
Page 1
Lab Number : 90-6335-10
Project No. : AVE-2620
Project Name : CHAMPION
Manager: GEORGE MAALOUF
Station ID : P-10
Matrix : SO
Type : GRAB
Collector : DCH
Remarks :
--- Project Information ---
Cust. No. .
--- Sample Information ---
Sampled Date/Time 06/28/90 17:50
Received Date/Time 06/30/90 13:50
Received From/By DCH/GP
Chain of Custody 8604
Number of Containers 1
--- Test Data ---
Parameter .............................. Method.... Units PQL....... Results... Test Date Analy
-- INORGANIC CHEMISTRY RESULTS --
pH
EPA
9040
units
2-12
11.8
07/09/90
GW
-- METALS ANALYSIS
- METALS PREP RESULTS --
Arsenic, TCLP
EPA
7060
mg/l
0.1
ND
07/10/90
DE
Barium, TCLP
EPA
6010
mg/1
0.5
ND
07/11/90
DE
Cadmium, TCLP
EPA
7130
mg/l
0.1
ND
07/12/90
DE
Chromium, TCLP
EPA
7191
mg/1
0.005
ND
07/12/90
DE
Lead, TCLP
EPA
7420
mg/l
0.5
ND
07/11/90
KE
Mercury, TCLP
EPA
7470
mg/1
0.1
ND
07/12/90
HH
Selenium, TCLP
EPA
7740
mg/1
0.1
ND
07/10/90
DE
Silver, TCLP
EPA
7760
mg/1
0.5
ND
07/11/90
KE
--- SERIES 35000
Total Metals Prep:
Aqueous ICP
EPA
3010
N/A
07/09/90
HH
Total Metals Prep:
Aqueous AA Flame
EPA
3010
N/A
07/09/90
HH
Total Metals Prep:
Aqueous Furnace
EPA
3020
N/A
07/09/90
HH
Total Metals Prep:
Aqueous, Hg
EPA
7470
N/A
07/11/90
HH
TCLP EXTRACTION
EPA
1311
N/A
07/05/90
HH
Signed �'� cl_ 1��i

LAW ENVIRONMENTAL NATIONAL LABORATORIES
TEST DATA REPORT
Date 07/13/90
Page 1
Lab Number 90-6335-11
Project No. AVE-2620
Project Name CHAMPION
Manager: GEORGE MAALOUF
Station ID TRIP BLANK
Matrix W
Type GRAB
Collector
Remarks :
--- Project Information ---
Cust. No. .
--- Sample Information ---
Sampled Date/Time
: 06/28/90
Received Date/Time
: 06/30/90 13:50
Received From/By
: DCH/GP
Chain of Custody
: 8604
Number of Containers :
6
--- Test Data ---
Parameter .............................. Method.... Units PQL....... Results... Test Date Analy
-- INORGANIC CHEMISTRY RESULTS --
pH
EPA
150.1
units
+/- 0.5
6.2
07/03/90
GW
Ignitability (Flash Point)
EPA
1010
F
75
>200
07/03/90
GW
--- SERIES 63000
Vinyl chloride
EPA
8240
ug/1
10
ND
07/09/90
PG
1,1-Dichloroethene
EPA
8240
ug/l
5
ND
07/09/90
PG
Chloroform
EPA
8240
ug/l
5
ND
07/09/90
PG
Carbon tetrachloride
EPA
8240
ug/1
5
ND
07/09/90
PG
Trichloroethene
EPA
8240
ug/1
5
ND
07/09/90
PG
Benzene
EPA
824o
ug/l
5
ND
07/09/90
PG
Tetrachloroethene
EPA
8240
ug/1
5
ND
07/09/90
PG
Chlorobenzene
EPA
8240
ug/1
5
ND
07/09/90
PG
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
EPA
8240
ug/l
5
ND
07/09/90
PG
Methyl ethyl Ketone
EPA
8240
ug/1
100
ND
07/09/90
PG
1,2-Dichloroethane
EPA
8240
ug/1
5
ND
07/09/90
PG
Signed �' `�

N
~ N `
J W
U a
Q 0 W
� 0 F
lt. Q Q
0
0 w W
() Z v1 U
w
!� Z
0
O
l9
W Z�
= -1
CU IL IL 0
LL
LL Q
z J
,
)
)
3
f
•1
J r1
Cep
..�
r.�
,..}
,...`
:'1
.+1
^M1f��
�'1
F.
Z
J
x A
J9 G�i 00OP a .
x Go
\ /6
O °'>
o• �
/y0, a /
2
�� Jybl°•'0�i
O 0
0,
J
SN3N]VJLN00 40 -ON
1VIO1
O
Z
tn
�
o
r�
0
IL
Q
Z
u
m
CI
j
U
U
O
W
0
Z
_O
F•
Q
~
U
Z
r
IA
w
J
¢
G.
�o
0 Q
WOcr
Q ¢
Z
Q
0 (D
a
.�
¢0°Lij
l�o
a
W Z N
Q
3urlOS
O v
�.�~zw v
W
Z)19
Z
W
F•
'dWOJ
Y
Q
0
Q
�
evaf)
U.
0
F
IIII'�►
a
Q
Q
L
U)
fA
©_m
—[`a1 -1 NI I ___ I I C-(I __I @I
.AI ci '.I 1
N
}
m
p
W
I
Ln
7
v
z
J
W
m
3
i
;a
W
3 3 z 0 3
W ti It W N
Q .� J_Zy �Ctnm
p J J K F a: W Q W
3 i- W J 13 N B
} Z 1 0 u D 3:
w I W W p Z Q U
O 0 Q O W Y Q 4
Z� Ix 0 u a N M
P
W U 00: Itto Ol Z D I m
H S"
Q J Q
Z F Z i/ n
l7 Q 2 UW � 9
1n ww
_ W _ 00 C
U
k
^j
W W
o � r
F
r
0 m C
m
J
m ,_
Q h
O J
F }
F m
z o
W
i Z Oo
a_
I F �,
N W
W w
J }'-.7:Z
n n.
I O 4
0
U � �
Q W $
w a 4
N
0. Q
O a
U }
0 p
J W
w Z
W
X
J a S
Z °
O Y
Z .�
O a 4
It Q
F- 2
$A W
25 m

ATTACHMENT III
PAINT FILTER TEST RESULTS

LAW ENGINEERING JOB NAME Ch4 ►�^R'��"' f'S JOB NO.
By JVI. DATE 0 CK DATE SHEET —OF
e
Lo c54w, plt
OMSW, Ca(ser o� 41 �, �S'-. __/✓II_: ,_et .'�qM%�S -t-SNAI1
- - _ J 1A ,E-----
i
Fps
--- --- -- - ---
3 /0: 0� Fuw, Nu Co�+wP oL �S)d,� 1d /Ilc7 Fee
_ _ 4- -3 r S - - --. _ ._ — - ----
---If f(i : 16 Fo»^- S.W CorNLe oc ND. - 1'r er -%' N��1 Pie 41
110E 4-_30' 'nI__�_-
_ / 0 3 U F o S Co + ►, r �- 31��C 1 Z N F_ct_ �� Gvoll Pfese4.� Af 5•n.;'.
_ 11 D'-C. + 50 '/✓ _ -- - -- - - --
b' Fig. No_tt_l�
----.-

Chi ,a�
�o
1�11 //
LAW ENNGIINEERING
JOB NAME
-S
JOB NO.
fo
�-�a 7U
BY
DATE CK
DATE
SHEET —OF -
1 II h
l 4"lr
r
r ^Y
�� .f- �
t � w� ¢,
L�C/1'f+.p.- � �`.�1s,,t,vZ pePt'►'� b t" �.�yyt(}!�
_
�� La
Flom NW co(_o% o4 ${
1 01 S �
IV,
u;�J
01 F_
Izs' E 3 9S's-
F,on, 5 W Co or oi ti
C r.'P� �U-car lie
0..D+ N
JV,
r,ev Ire
r N r f f J1-Jk ?r^-
IZ
F1 O w► > W CL I r4vr 0 F t11 Q
r
Na
+
LlI
IV
�ar._.
]5
IZ: 2U
From !JW LD(110,- v= Cal A
`
/Vo
ICC
��'r 50'S

4
Ryl
DIVISION OF HEALTH SERVICES
P.O. Box 2091
Raleigh, N.C. 27602-2091
January 20, 1984
Ms. Mary Lee Ransmeier
Champion Papers
Canton Mill
Canton, N. C. 28716
Dear Ms. Ransmeier:
Subject: Disposal of Cathodes at Town of Canton Landfill
Ronald H. Levine, M.D., M.P.H.
STATE HEALTH DIRECTOR
This office has no objection to disposal of the cathodes provided:
1. The owner/operator agrees to the disposal.
2. The asbestos material should be wet with water and the cathodes
wrapped with plastic.
3. The cathodes are immediately covered with soil upon arrival at
the landfill.
4. The operator is advised the cathodes contain asbestos and care
is taken to cover them without allowing the asbestos to become
airborne.
5. Preparation and delivery complies with OSHA and DOT standards.
It is recommended that water be used instead of oil and should be
pointed out that oil and other liquids are not permitted for disposal
at sanitary landfills.
If you have any questions, please advise.
Sincerely,
�e don Layton, EnviroAental Engineer
lid & Hazardous Waste Management Branch
vironmental Health Section
JGL:ct
cc: Jim Moore/
Town of Canton Landfill
James B Hunt, Jr Sarah T. Morrow, M D., M.P.H
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA GOVERNOR / DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES SECRETARY

z4e (`Soiun of Tanton, �K. &
Office of The Town Manager
WILLIAM G. STAMEY
TOWN MANAGER
September 20, 1990
Mr. Julian M. Foscue, III
Western Area Supervisor
NC Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Solid Waste Section
310 East Third Street, Suite 200
Winston-Salem, NC 27106
Dear Mr. Foscue:
In compliance with Solid Waste management's policy of written
follow up notification of a landfill fire, this letter is being
sent to inform you of a recent fire at the Canton municipal
landfill.
On Wednesday, September 12, 1990, a fire occurred at the
Canton municipal landfill. I have attached reports from various
departments and agencies concerning the cause and procedures we
took to address the situation.
Please contact me should you need additional information
concerning this matter.
Sincerely yours,
TOWN OF CANTON
Wi iani Stame
Town Manager
WGS/rg
Attachments
cc: Mr. Thad Bryson, Area F Coordinator,
NC Division of Emergency Management
Mr. Paul Wiegand, Environmental Supervisor,
Champion International Corporation •

W-
1•
O
z
0
J
W
W
C
O
U
W
J
z
Q
W
H
Z
a
aaci
w
Z
-
ri v
aJ
r_
0
��
Q W
?
LU
<
a
x
a
a
w>
w
zo
-, a i 44
>a +�
0 0
a, E
a• �`•
_
N
I
c+?
)
O
U
•'�CL
LU
2 I
.ree A�
(n , V W i I
¢
W W
LU
N
N lD
lD
O
i
U)
4j U w
tx Z2 x
Ouj
¢
N 3¢ U) (a cc❑❑
O I
a
ocn
W'
� a' A
oQ
co o
N M
u I
141
EA+ z
rl 1^
�
O z e
r-
w W
i r0 ; is 0�
a
p' r
O
= J
Z
w
U X N J
�;
w
o
Q O
>
Q
cc
v
�� C a
�o 0
Quo
=
O
N .L
Q
W
3i r•1 v Q) i
o
U
ui
z rp
J
CE
O
0
O d r6 I
�w ❑
,�'
ON
04 N
N
w -i
O 11 r
`❑ z
a''{
¢
n
Q r❑ t IJ
O
cc 4-4
`�
Z
O i rD
S 4 �4 i
a
N
C7
Q
rNX, }4
4 QQ o
LL ro v
w
UJW
a
2r,
a
I}-
cc U
L4 V
u) ` v � f 4 C
.I
ao\�J
a I
LU—
all
°
w
v i U C1 U
�+ ❑ 3
C
0 o
Q
O�
o
a
a
O ( M � I
z
IL
o
o
I
A N C O
OLL
U
a
U i E+ � � �
O
N
U
z
x
ro g
V)
c
a�i
�o�
I
X' x
U
u~i
Q
O_
O>
O
¢
ro N
a
0.
W
•�
W ri
cl)Q)
W
�
•e••I
�r1
z
N �
s d E C" , end j On i
v
W N L
z 41
LL
Q
zU
V J
J
O: V
Y-.
�_
w
rro
,-.� F+ :, , V YI I
�' v
w 1~
O RS
cn
W W
x
�
O O
O
•�•�
i-
M
I
i O J-% N
N
S �irrl1
�a
Zo
o
o
Qw
°aa
��
w0
U
w>
-
v
a
N` ❑; A! ra
Ww�
ca
H
U
H
L!i
7 W
� z
a O
¢
O ro i r0 i Gl.;
u7 Qp�
U
>
w
u)
O
z
o
O� H x h 0 3
Q 0
>
N
u)
U)
w
a I
LUW
w
N C U 0 x V
'-1 O N v i :a i
� 00,
�
¢ O
O O
ti
¢,
Z
w
U
z
LL
O
€
U
°C
LLJ
w
p
° w
� y
p v U (a
F— C
OU
cp
c N
N
V)
>
U11",.
z
O .0
rnl UI �I
w Q
U
¢
U
O
a I¢
O I
r 1 -+ g
i O
a
ui
i
w
r:
r
1H
ro
W
J
Q O
f
w
¢
N U) 's •rl '. 44
14 i S4 rQ�-
H O''r�
}4 ; ra i N 41
z
°
w
w
r0
> U)
o o
z
A ,-� a, !❑
N U ro! o
C7
m
o
w
1~ A U�
..
4a O i
O
>
cn
M
w
.0 I O IJ ! rt3 i S4 ;
a u ; �, 4a ,
U
Y
Q
LLI¢
a
UJ 3[ r+; U N i b;
LL
O
(a
•rl
N
U
Oo
Q
m
U
p
w
w
o
p
w
cn W
U;
+J Ul
�i
Q
av
w
z
z
ra
rO o N �; v
¢
ui
Q
fn
O
p
U
•rl
G 2 v
v,
¢
U
w
v ro v U) v
v:
O)
�
OU
Z
O
w
vOi
Cl)
�
v UU >v!
N I 01 i TS'
U
N
C7 N
Cr 4-J
> H
CJ
f
i
rU
w
U Q
¢
U
A S4 !�•
p' u) �a
O N
Z N
N
O rt3
F-
Q
w
M
CC
> >
z
w
�a i ;
� ! r0 ; ; ?
'�i
u�
O
w U
w
z
2
w
w U
w
0
0
z
w
ti
Q
¢
O' U' Ci iS�i O;
P+
o
Q o
_
o a
o x ca
O u
U)
o
w¢
JLu
2
0
c'`i
0
¢
I �
z
U U
z
O Z
O
Ow
Z
w
¢
U z
z Q
cL �
z¢
a
w
cra
2
U
z
w
a
Z
=
¢>
w.
rl I .�G i v ': �1
U Ni
�n UJ
}
Y•rt
iI
w O
cn U.
z
Y 0
� w
z v
O
�-
� q �j
�
c'i
r&>
w�
m
a
�
�n
w
w
°
i
a I v O � �s
! 1�I
¢
w LY
O
U s
U
z
w
¢
z
2
CC
ui
U _
I
�
LL
~ ,�
w
LL¢
¢ ; Ln
i �. I a I
w
U¢
g
LL a
Q�
d
¢
w
O O
¢
w
r
O
U¢¢
Q
Q
w y
0 2
m\
Q 2
W
X v l +� N:.
LL
O
C7
U
O
a v
J 2
¢�
O
w
w>¢
w>>
a
J
O
Z v i ri i >; r I f (a
a
`t
U
vi E
ro o
M
U
U
O
!-
lL
04.
(G
N
N N
C.yM

w
0
z
0
z
z
0
ri
0
a:
T:
0
z
0
i
0
(D
as
U)
ci
�4
Q)
P4
En
I
I
l
I
(
I
�
_
!
U)
I
°'(
I
i
I
i
I!,
7
C
4J
z
LU
ro
cc
En
0 C\
0
(V
�4
U)
En
<
z
>1
41
0
ro
4-)
(L
ro
4-J
z cc
0 <
r�
M
3
I
p z
< uj
N
! 4J
I
I
(
I
< U)
>1
Z > a.
�4
a4
�a4
G)
C)
O1
0
ra
I I
~orn
::E
S4
0
M
0
ro
Q)
<
C)
0
0
U)
ro
En
i cn
r_:
�4
0
u
CD
0
14
0i
i
(
!
I
!
I
I
I I
0 r-I
z
Q)
.,I
C)
'T
H
41
�4
uj
'IT
U;
-P
0
I
i
I
I
I
j
z
LU
0
>1
4-4
<
z
z
A
ro
cc
Lu N
-P
En
ra
I a)
U)
�4
UH
)
U)
I
<
L�
0
i �
�I
I
I
�
j
f
�4
U)
En
�4i�
i
t
I
I
(
l
.I--
4J
.I )
r-
-P
0
a)
Q)
E-1
ro
a)
U)
(n
CD
u
(D
r4
4.4
.14
a
U)
0r-I
04
-P
41
as
u
L"
2
0
>
U
U
44
<
z Z
4J
w
z
ui U
cc
C:
2
U.
C)
<
<
z
0
1
Ili

Russell Teague
21 Adams St.
Captain
Acting Chief
Canton Fire Dept.
648-3351
t
File No.24-87-90
Captain Russell Teague was interviewed on Wednesday September 19, 1990 at
0845:Interview was conducted by Lt. Ashe of the Canton Police Dept.
The interview was in reference to Six Barrels of Chlorine Crystals,being
mistakenly hauled to the Canton Landfill,being run over by the Packer and
igniting the Garbage,On Wednesday September 12, 1990.
Captain Teague stated that on Wednesday September 12, 1994he was called by
radio and advised to report to the Canton Landfill,with his Hazmat Book.
Captain Teague stated that on arrival at the Landfill he was met by Leo Cayton
and Max Bradburn member of the Champion Hazmat Team.
Captain Teague futher stated that he was taken to an area in the Landfill,where
garbage had been dumped.Captain Teague futher stated that he observed six 50
pound paste board barrels,that had been ran over.by the-=Packer.The_barrels when
brought to the landfill were full of a product identified as being Chlorine
Crystals HTH (Calcium Hypochlorite).
The result of the barrels being ruptured,was the chemical reacting with the
moisture in the soil and garbage, producing chemical fires and .a_._sma1.1ivapor
cloud.
Alarm was given out by phone'to Canton Fire Dept.and Champion Hazmat Personnel.
Canton Fire Department responded with one pumper and fourteen personnel -The
North Canton Fire Department responded,with one tanker and three personnel.The
North Canton Fire Department set up a drop tank for water supply.
It was decided that heavy equipmmnt was needed to relocate the barrels of HTH
and uncover any others that might have already been buried and extinguish the
flames.
Max Bradburn Champion Hazmat Coordinator,dressed in full turnout gear with
breathing equipment using the Canton Landfill Packer was able to seperate
the chemical product from the garbage and spreading the debri,the fire was
extinguished. r
The unused portion of the chemical was loaded into a Champion Truck,took to
Champions Waste Treatment Plant.
a
Captain Teague stated the the Canton Fire Departments primary duty was to set
up fire protection and that at no time was any water used on the chemical.K

Leo Cayton File No.-24-87-90
Assistant Director
of Public Works
Town of Canton
Leo Cayton was interviewed on Wednesday September 19, 1990 at 0915,at the
Canton Fire Dept.The interview was conducted by Lt. Ashe of the Canton
Police Dept.The interview was in reference to six barrels of Chlorine
Crystals,being mistakenly hauled to the Canton Landfill,by Champion Trucks.
The barrels were run over by the packer,igniting the garbage and forming
a Chlorine cloud.
Assistant Public Works Director Leo Cayton,stated that on Wednesday Sept.
12, 1990,he got a call from Don Liford,Land Fill Supe`rvisor:Don Liford
stated that they were having some explosions from some.type of chemical
and this was setting the garbage on fire.
Leo Cayton stated that he called Russell Teague to meet him at the Land-
Fill,with his chemical book.On the way he stopped at Champion to pick up
Derrick Brown.He reccmended that they pick up Max Bradburn,who is State
Certified to handle Hazardous Material.
On arrival at the Land Fill,they found that several 50 pound paste board
barrels that contained Chlorine Crystals had been run over by the Garbage
Compactor operated by Jack Putnman.The.crystals after being exposed to the
moisture in the ground and the garbage,began to react nad ignited the garbage
and formed a Chlorine Cloud.
Jack Putnman Town of Canton Employee drove through the cloud and inhaled
some of the Chlorine.He drove himself to the Haywood Co. Hospital Emergency
Rocm,where he,was treated and released.
Leo Cayton futher stated that someone had apparently loaded a skid full of
the Chlorine Crystals,where as the barrels are normaly empty when they are
transported to the Land Fill to be disposed of.
Leo Cayton stated that he turned the scene over to Acting Chief Russel Teague
of the Canton Fire Department.

i
UChampion
Champion International Corporation
To: Date:
Mi:k- 'Rt- :nehart F September 19, 1990
From: Subject
.Max Bradburn HAZMAT Incident Canton
Landfill
The following is a sequence of events which occured on
September 12, 1990, the Champion International Canton
Mill's Hazardous Material Emergency Response Team answered
a call for mutual aid from the Canton Fire Department. The
response was to the Canton landfill on Dutch Cove Road.
Derric Brown, Leo Cayton and myself arrived. at the. scene
and observed what appeared to be. a chemical'fireand small
vapor cloud, -(approximately 60' X 20') in the northeast end
of the landfill.
Russell Teague acting fire 'chief c.t the Canton Fire
Department was already at the ,scene, and informed -me that
two Canton employees had inhaled some of the vapor, and
were complaining of a burning sensation in their lungs and
shortness of breath. I' advised him to send them to- medical
aid. One man was sent to the Emergency room at Haywood
County Hospital, treated for chlorine inhalation and
released.
Max Bradburn, Leo Cayton, Russell Teague, and. Derric Brown,
using appropriate P.P.E. approached from uphill,.. up wind
for a closer look at the scene. We saw that looked to be
several full 50 lb. barrels of HTH (Calcium Hypochlorite).
Russell Teague asked for Ricky Early, and Jerry Patton to
get North Canton Fire Department's tanker and dump tank as
our water supply, I requested Mike Rhinehart to alert the
Mill Hazmat Team. Twelve members responded to the incident,
also six first responders were held in staging in case
medical aid was needed.
Canton Fire Department had one pumper and six fire fighters
at the scene. One 2 1/2" hose was laid and charged. All
personnel were in full turnout gear and SCBA's. Melvin
Robinson and I suited up in full turnout gear and the
SCBA's with disposable encapsulated suits over these.

It was decided that heavy equipment was needed to dig out
the fire and locate remaining levels of HTH. Spreading the r
e debris and digging out the barrels extinguished the fire
and we recovered approximately 15 barrels full, or
partially full, of calcium hypochlorite. The driver of.the
equipment was dressed in the appropriate PPE. We had air
back-up, rescue man also -iressed. Medical surveillance was
also close. Times were taken of all personnel in
encapsulating suits.
The recovered Calcium Hycochlorite was taken to Champion
W.T.P in a company truck and introduced into our primary
influent. Incident secureed at 4:30 PM.
The following were the key personnel at the incident:
Incident Commander - Russell Teague
Hazmat - Max Bradburn
Staging - Mike Rhinehart
Safety Officer - Park Willis, Chief
North Canton Fire Department
Medical - Mike.P..lemmons
Equipment Operator - Max Bradburn
Champion Truck Driver - Terry Calloway
Corrective action will be taken by our invironmental
section, as to•.retraining appropriate personnel on mill
procedure for handling empty fiberboard barrels.
Max Bradburn
Hazmat Coordinator
cc:
Jim
Landers
Jean
Scuglik-Marshall
Liz
Dickson
Paul
Wiegand
Jim.Kidd
t

Cl'iamaion papers
=:c-ion into ..3ilv^al _--roolatlon
December 30, 1983
Mr. J. Gordon Layton
Environmental Engineer
Solids and Hazardous Waste
Management Branch
Environmental Health Section
Division of Health Services
P.O. Box 2091
Raleigh, North Carolina 27602-2091
Dear Gordon:
orflf'o':na _.
As we discussed, in going through our inventory of spare parts
for the chlorine manufacturing process, it was determined that
some 178 S-type Hocker cell cathodes are no longer usable due to
metal corrosion.
Each cathode is four feet by five feet by one foot thick and is
made of iron and copper weighing approximately nine hundred pounds.
The internal part of the cathode is a wire mesh containing a film
of asbestos material. The cathode and anode portion of the cell
are encased in concrete shells. Because it is impractical to
completely remove every trace of asbestos which would render these
cathodes safe for recycle as scrap metal, we are making plans to
dispose of them safely.
In accordance with asbestos disposal regulations we plan to submerse
each cathode in tall oil (a sellable by-product from our process)
leaving the asbestos dust -free. Each cathodes will then be wrapped
in plastic and appropriately labeled with asbestos warning labels.
The Town of Canton has agreed to landfill these cathodes in the
manner previously agreed to by the State for asbestos disposal.
The tall oil will be drummed and disposed of in the same manner
along with the dipping trough.
We have given this situation a great deal of thought and feel that
this would be an environmentally safe disposal method. I have
discussed this situation with Jim Moore who advised me to also call
you. Please advise me if this plan is agreeable to you or if you
have additional recommendations or questions.
Sincerely,
fLee Ransmeier

December 30, 1983
Page 2
Copy: Mr. Robert L. Marlewski
Vice President Operations Manager
Champion International Corporation
Champion Papers - Canton Mill
Canton, North Carolina 28716
Mr. Bill Stamev
Town Manager
Town of Canton
Canton, North Carolina
Mr. Jim Moore
District Sanitarian
Division of Health Services
Western Regional Offices
Building 3
Black Mountain, N.C. 28711

w Law Environmental, Inc.
Pensacola Branch
7215 Pine Forest Road
Pensacola, Florida 32526
November 21, 1990
Mr. Mark Preddy
Law Engineering, Inc.
Four Interchange Blvd.
Greenville, SC 29607
Clt #12024 Proj. #AVM-2717
Dear Mr. Preddy:
Below are results of analysis of 1
on November 16, 1990:
sample received for examination
Location code: CHAMP2 Loc. Desc.: HC-2 Pb only
LAB I.D. AA03982 P.O./Project No. AVM-2717 Client No. 12024
Collection Date: 11/14/90 Collection Time: 11:50
Submittal Date: 11/16/90 Submittal Time: 15:11
Sample collector: D. HENN
------------------------------------------------------------------------
TEST UNITS TEST DETECTION
PARAMETER RESULT LIMIT
------------------------------------------------------------------------
2310-pH by Method 150.1 7.9
2310-LDRL,Ext. Met. S. EPA 1311 done
Multicomponent analysis: 2310-LDRL Metals EPA 6010
Lead ug/L Not Det 27.0
2322-Moisture EPA 160.3 % 21.8
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Please advise should you have questions concerning these data.
Respectfully submitted,
�y-t
J'amas M.G. Tucci, Operations Manager

Capital Projects Office
23V2 Church Street
P.O. Box 1489
Canton, North Carolina 28716
Telephone: [phone]
Pax: 704 646-2275
Champion
,.namnion internauonai Corporation
November 30, 1990
Mr. Bill Hocutt
Solid Waste Management Division
Solid Waste Section
P.O. Box 27687
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687
Dear Mr. Hocutt:
Attached is the information concerning excavated soil at
Champion International Corporation's Canton Mill. The
information includes the State of North Carolina Procedure
and Criteria for Waste Determination form, and Law
Engineering laboratory test data reports for the tank farm
area soils. On November 21, 1990 I received verbal
approval from you to dispose of this material in the Canton
Municipal Landfill.
The excavation is required to permit pile cap construction
of bleaching towers and tanks associated with the Canton
Modernization Project. Pile cap construction is
anticipated to require excavations ranging from 3 to 6.5
feet below the existing ground surface.
Champion has conducted extensive testing of this material.
The following details summarize this assessment. Figure 1
is a site location map of Champion's Canton Mill. The
excavation zone measures approximately 300 feet by 100 feet
in area. Twenty test pits were excavated in randomly
distributed locations across the area as shown in Figure 2.
A backhoe was used to excavate the test pits. The backhoe
was steam cleaned prior to performing each excavation to
prevent cross -contamination between sampling locations.
Law Engineering sampled the soil on November 14, 1990.
Soil samples P-1 through P-20 were collected in 8-ounce
glass jars with teflon lids. Sample containers were
prepared from the laboratory and certified sterile. The
soil samples were identifyied and shipped overnight in an
insulated cooler to Law Environmental National Laboratories
in Pensacola, Florida for analysis.

Champion International Corporation
Mr. Bill Hocutt
November 30, 1990
Page 2
In the Laboratory, all the soil samples were extracted by
the Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure (TCLP).
Attachment II includes the test data reports and chain of
custody records for sample points S-1 through S-20.
Samples S-1 through S-20 were analyzed for lead (EPA Method
6010) and pH (EPA Method 150.1). Additionally, samples S-1
through S-10 were composited in the laboratory into 2
samples. The 2 composite samples were analyzed for the
complete TCLP list (Federal Register, March 29,
1990,p.11804) and for pH and moisture content. The TCLP
toxicity analysis includes the 8 selected metals,
pesticides (EPA Method 8080), herbicides (EPA Method 8150),
volatile organic compounds (EPA Method 8240) and acid
extractable and base neutral semi -volatile organic
compounds (EPA Method 8270).
Concentrations of barium, lead, and chromium were detected
in the soil samples. However, this analysis indicates the
soils are not classified hazardous based on criteria
established by EPA or the State of North Carolina for the
characterization of a hazardous waste by the TCLP. The
average measured concentrations are: lead 16.8 ppb,
chromium 5 ppb, and barium 1.19 ppm. The measured
concentrations were well below the North Carolina landfill
maximum.
The soil does not exhibit the characteristic of corrosivity
because the representative soil pH (EPA Method 9045) is 8.4
and not aqueous or liquid. The representative soil sample
pH of 8.4 is far below the corrosivity limit of 12.5.
Paint filter tests have not been performed on this
material. However, sample points S-1 through S-20 were
analyzed for moisture content (EPA Method 160.3). The
average soil moisture content is 27.9 percent. This is
well below 50 percent moisture content. As always, if free
liquids were detected the excavated soil would be dried on -
site before transport to the sanitary landfill.
If you have any questions or need additional information
please contact me at 646-2252.
Derric Brown
Environmental Coordinator
Canton Modernization Project
attachments

[:ion nternational Corporation
Copy: Mr. Julian Foscue III
Western Area Supervisor
310E. Third Street
Suite 200
Winton Salem, North Carolina 27106
Mr. Bill Hocutt
Solid Waste Management Division
Solid Waste Section
P.O. Box 27687
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687
Ms. Carolyn Merritt
Manager Solid Waste Programs
Champion International Corporation
One Champion Plaza
Stamford, Connecticut 06921
Mr. James E. Patterson
Rt 1. Box 179
Hayesville, North Carolina 28904

,J • � C
5 A j 13
`wL^ , ��� .� i / � ��. � ; � Y. � �CNIUL1..i11lOn $Oh �:�">>'�+i�-•��l%.Ar •hll,�!Fr � � ,� .� - c
ol
Xv
moo c
Nab
Big W3
Nn.
6t1L' ...�.�r�;/y � 1 �L, ,y7 vv - ,i.. . . � .,��� �►-':��'' j• \lI — !� t • :gip ,
i .'`rak./ / ; - ..�-- � ` .�r..�--:.�� %/•"ram I 1'�` ..i . I � � � .. .i .
\` ' j 'ram. ..'R\� �ti�rt1. \\%���• ri �� n'•q '\�..� .—� /•'� � ..• • �,�
H' tpr �. .�,•
•PNIOM1 ' • •rI• a � ' .,,•..' /,•� r, ` : � ' )�. r � 7 p � - - - �'•.:. ,�,.� I�JJ ).4s� • //;p
it �"f r�•••..:. `, � Sms � . «
r illl•� ��.� _ �l 11 "a. • � \ �•• - `' .` .-. r. ^,� ° /...-.T
ryi/,M i i r %i ) ,t f.. •,��rl � �'�'� . \ �� :.t.. ,, .11� �-- • \�lTii�1SOIIL�OVIA
� �.- _ - \ ••• �a 1. �': �: •' •�rl'� `. �
�� ✓�" �� V,_, �� `: Jr:!!i¢Is�eb 1"¢ 1 Atil• 'I•;s�.i(,••. : r_. .\\ \
wtonmi
tation
SMtHT'IZSri �i•• :r� .) �'{
2346 U 1- t • _
J / � /� \\. ��� � =�� f�/r °-r--i"' �- �- -�--,.iJ_' •_. • } tip- _r.
•wo // r �; v/)/
P%L�ldiiidsr � �. , y S • � �uj ' ; � ;/ =-- . ,..-- •�i� ^ /---r • : ,�o�, _ j\/ � `_� -.� v,
'� � ... r / �'y. �'• �,i� ;N���,,,�=,°r .ram ,� \ r•• f '��
(lh \ ,-� l` /-� M� ` �� It (� •�// M `\ ` �'f '...� •' ` CN.N•I f/YY ii'\./•r1
2760ram/ 5
-4-14wwoodFfemorut Oh ✓�I i rra� �� %� •., • i� 5u ��`�• "'.ir1'��--! / ,. CG 1\l' :i ���
REFERENCE:
USGS TOPOGRAPMIC MAP, CANTON. N.C.
QUADRANGLE. 7.5 MINUTE SERIES. DATED 1967.
APPROXIMATE SCALE: 1• = 2000'

1
M1
ti
w�
72
1
� A
�74
bA
66 � o
78 27
so
a
Coo
CO 0
AO
e °0
sob
F S-3 S O
• - • 9 • S-13 FLOOR 22)
S-1 �5-10 • ,--�
S 2• S-t7 S-2 4 �S+o
\ S-1 S- • �� 2
O \o S- 1 • 14°q —18 ! O
o c>
S 4 �S-12 S_16 S 19
S_8 �, �. 6�
/� \ S-15 c �'
C79A)[!� 62
�--) \p� O ) S9 13
0
O
0 C)79 O � \
57
LEGIMQ .tip O Ooll
• SAWLE LOC JM 0 so 100
F NO.2 FIBER LINE LAW ENGINEERING
H DIOXME MWER APPROX SCALE. FEET GREENVILLE, SOUTH CARQUNA
AREA OF
PNOTOCOPIED FROM 'MASTER MILL PLOT PLAN. SOL 8AMPLNG AND AMALYM TANK FARM AREA
WNCENTMED NOG PROJECT'. DR^VM NQ CMAA PM IN I MOKMAL 03flurwil
100-A-001-A. PROVOW BY CR8 S/:#ME DXnM ATM NORTN CARC L94A
4/ 19/90. JOB NQ AVM-2717 FILM
-ME PRINT MACHINE.INC 'Oarm

^•ar^aliOnal c,)rt]Orahon
ATTACHMENT I
7ROCEDURE AND CRITERIA FOR WASTE DETERMINATION

`n= procedure will be used by the Solid Waste Marsaq®erit Division to determine
whether a waste is (1) hazardcM as defined by 15A NC AC 13B, and (2) suitable for
disposal at a solid waste manaK�- facility. 11 a types of wastes that will be
evaluated by this p ?rd= a_rp p):Jmrsly, but, not exclusively, ; xtist -; a l and
cc merr_ial wastes and sUtdesas,, exd RUblialy Owned Treatment Works Sludges.
The Solid Waste Mw ag-axaric Division reserves the right to request additional
infa�atirti or waive sane of the requirements base i on the type of waste if it deems
necessary. The Division may also require r e some wastes to be treated or altered to render
the wash; erri r onment-a t 7 y immobile prior to disposal at a sanitary landfill. wastes
disposed at sanitary landfills must be non -liquid which can be properly managed in
anee with the "Solid Waste Managemant lades". APPROVAL M DISPOSE OF THE WASTE
SHALL ALSO BE OHI? = F C K TIM OWNER OR OPFRATR OF UEE IANDFILL PRIOR TO DISPOSAL.
The following information is required for an evaluation. Incomplete waste
forms will be returned to the generator without review. An asterisk(*)
denotes information required for Publicly Owned Treatment Works.
A * GENERAL INFi7RMATION
1. Name, =EPA NE NUMER and mailing addressof facility or person generating waste
Champion InternatiorL11. Corporation,
[phone]
_!ainstreet, 2.0. Box C-10, Canton, NC 28716
2. Specific location of waste (i.e. SR. #, County, city, etc...)
Champion International Cbrnoration, Havwood County, Canton, N.C.
3. What is the waste? Excavated soil materials containing reinforced Concrete, wood
and pipes.
4. Wbat voltre of disposal will there be? Less than 10,000 cubic yards
5. What frequetxy of disposal will there be? Daily 4-10-hour days weeks
6. Explain either the manufacturing process or how the waste was generated. The
zone has been e�:cavated for construction of a new fiber line building and
severLi ::ank structures
B INFICfak ON FUR HAZARDOUS (RC RA) DEMON (15A NCAC 13B .0006)
1. Is the waste listed tinder .0006(e) (i.e., 40 CFR 261.31 — 261.33) r If yes, list
number. No
*2. Does the waste exhibit any of the four ct aract er-i ct-i cs as defined by .0006(d)
(i.e., 40 CFR 261.21-261.24) ? (Attach laboratory results for TC T Dd city,
Reactivity, Ignitability, Corrosivity.) No
C INFUMMCK FM 1ANDF1ILIM � ON
1. Doles the waste caltam any hazardous waste aristituents listed in . 0006 (e) ,
Appendix VIII (i.e., 40 CFR 261, Appendix VIII)? If yes, what constituents and what
CCrnaentration? (Attach laboratory results) Lead 16.8 ppm, chromium 0.005 ppm.
Barium 1.19 ppm,
2. `+gnat other ccmtit7Tt'nVf; z;re tart and in what concentration?
(Attach laboratory results) "'uil reinforced concrete, wood, and pipes. The
wa ;te cc..L-� S zu C.Uld fraction.
3. Will the hancUing and disposal of this waste create dust einitGiens which may
CM] LrP a health hazard or nuisance to landfill personnel.. No
*4. Does the Waste pass the "paint filter" test for free liquids (Method 9095 in
S.W. 846)'? (Attach laboratory Wilts) No tree liquids. Average soil moisture 280
*5. Which solid waste management facility is the request for (name of landfill
and permit =93er, ircinerat=, etc ... )?Town of Canton Landfill, Permit No 44-04
*5. Specify how the waste will be delivered - in bulk or containers (i.e.
barrels, bags, etc.) 10 Cubic vard dumntrucks

^rc^ '^'nrnauonal C,)rroration
ATTACHMENT II
LAW ENVIRONMENTAL NATIONAL LABORATORIES
i'EST DATA REPORT
J

Law Environmental, Inc.
Pensacola Branch
7215 Pine Forest Road
Pensacola, Florida 32526
November 21, 1990
Mr. Mark Preddy
Law Engineering, Inc.
Four Interchange Blvd.
Greenville, SC 29607
Clt #12024 Proj. #AVM-2717
Dear Mr. Preddy:
Below are results of analysis of 10
on November 16, 1990:
NOV 2 6 lgorn
LAW ENGINEERING
tNVILLE, S.C.
samples received for examination
Location code: CHAMP2 Loc. Desc.: S-1
LAB I.D. AA03929 P.O./Project No. AVM-2717 Client No. 12024
Collection Date: 11/14/90 Collection Time: 14:45
Submittal Date: 11/16/90 Submittal Time: 13:23
Sample collector: DCH
------------------------------------------------------------------------
TEST UNITS TEST DETECTION
PARAMETER RESULT LIMIT
------------------------------------------------------------------------
2310-pH by Method 150.1 8.4
2310-LDRL Ext. Met. S. EPA 1311 done
Multicomponent analysis:.2310-LDRL Metals EPA 6010
Lead ug/L Not Det 27.0
2322-Moisture EPA 160.3 % 17
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Location code: CHAMP2 Loc. Desc.: S-2
LAB I.D. AA03930 P.O./Project No. AVM-2717 Client No. 12024
Collection Date: 11/14/90 Collection Time: 15:15
Submittal Date: 11/16/90 Submittal Time: 13:23
Sample collector: DCH
------------------------------------------------------------------------
TEST UNITS TEST DETECTION
PARAMETER RESULT LIMIT
------------------------------------------------------_------------------
2310-pH by Method 150.1 10.6
2310-LDRL Ext. Met. S. EPA 1311 done
Multicomponent analysis: 2310-LDRL Metals EPA 6010
Lead ug/L Not Det 27.0
2322-Moisture EPA 160.3 % 22

Mr. Mark Preddy
Page: 2
November 21, 1990
Location code: CHAMP2 Loc. Desc.: S-3
LAB I.D. AA03931 P.O./Project No. AVM-2717 Client No. 12024
Collection Date: 11/14/90 Collection Time: 15:30
Submittal Date: 11/16/90 Submittal Time: 13:23
Sample collector: DCH
------------------------------------------------------------------------
TEST UNITS TEST DETECTION
PARAMETER RESULT LIMIT
------------------------------------------------------------------------
2310-pH by Method 150.1 9.6
2310-LDRL Ext. Met. S. EPA 1311 done
Multicomponent analysis: 2310-LDRL Metals EPA 6010
Lead ug/L Not Det 27.0
2322-Moisture EPA 160.3 % 24
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Location code: CHAMP2 Loc. Desc.: S-4
LAB I.D. AA03932 P.O./Project No. AVM-2717 Client No. 12024
Collection Date: 11/14/90 Collection Time: 15:55
Submittal Date: 11/16/90 Submittal Time: 13:23
Sample collector: DCH
------------------------------------------------------------------------
TEST UNITS TEST DETECTION
PARAMETER RESULT LIMIT
------------------------------------------------------------------------
2310-pH by Method 150.1 9.2
2310-LDRL Ext. Met. S. EPA 1311 done
Multicomponent analysis: 2310-LDRL Metals EPA 6010
Lead ug/L Not Det 27.0
2322=Moisture EPA 160.3 % 24
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Location code: CHAMP2 Loc. Desc.: S-5
LAB I.D. AA03933 P.O./Project No. AVM-2717 Client No. 12024
Collection Date: 11/14/90 Collection Time: 16:10
Submittal Date: 11/16/90 Submittal Time: 13:23
Sample collector: DCH
------------------------------------------------------------------------
TEST UNITS TEST DETECTION
PARAMETER RESULT LIMIT
------------------------------------------------------------------------
2310-pH by Method 150.1 9.5
2310-LDRL Ext. Met. S. EPA 1311 done

Mr. Mark Preddy
Page: 3
November 21, 1990
Sample AA03933 (continued)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
TEST UNITS TEST DETECTION
PARAMETER RESULT LIMIT
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Multicomponent analysis: 2310-LDRL Metals EPA 6010
Lead ug/L Not Det 27.0
2322-Moisture EPA 160.3 % 23
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Location code: CHAMP2 Loc. Desc.: S-6
LAB I.D. AA03934 P.O./Project No. AVM-2717 Client No. 12024
Collection Date: 11/14/90 Collection Time: 16:30
Submittal Date: 11/16/90 Submittal Time: 13:23
Sample collector: DCH
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
TEST UNITS TEST DETECTION
PARAMETER RESULT LIMIT
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
2310-pH by Method 150.1 7.5
2310-LDRL Ext. Met. S. EPA 1311 done
Multicomponent analysis: 2310-LDRL Metals EPA 6010
Lead ug/L 35 27.0
2322-Moisture EPA 160.3 % 17
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Location code: CHAMP2 Loc. Desc.: S-7
LAB I.D. AA03935 P.O./Project No. AVM-2717 Client No. 12024
Collection Date: 11/14/90 Collection Time: 16:40
Submittal Date: 11/16/90 Submittal Time: 13:23
Sample collector: DCH
------------------------------------------=-----------------------------
TEST UNITS_ TEST DETECTION
PARAMETER RESULT LIMIT
------------------------------------------------------------------------
2310-pH by Method 150.1 6.8
2310-LDRL Ext. Met. S. EPA 1311 done
Multicomponent analysis: 2310-LDRL Metals EPA 6010
Lead ug/L 42 27.0
2322-Moisture EPA 160.3 % 43
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Mr. Mark Preddy
Page: 4
November 21, 1990
Location code: CHAMP2 Loc. Desc.: S-8
LAB I.D. AA03936 P.O./Project No. AVM-2717 Client No. 12024
Collection Date: 11/14/90 Collection Time: 16:55
Submittal Date: 11/16/90 Submittal Time: 13:23
Sample collector: DCH
------------------------------------------------------------------------
TEST UNITS TEST DETECTION
PARAMETER RESULT LIMIT)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
2310-pH by Method 150.1 7.3
2310-LDRL Ext. Met. S. EPA 1311 done
Multicomponent analysis: 2310-LDRL Metals EPA 6010
Lead ug/L Not Det 27.0
2322-Moisture EPA 160.3 % 26
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Location code: CHAMP2 Loc. Desc.: S-9
LAB I.D. AA03937 P.O./Project No. AVM-2717 Client No. 12024
Collection Date: 11/14/90 Collection Time: 17:15
Submittal Date: 11/16/90 Submittal Time: 13:23
Sample collector: DCH
------------------------------------------------------------------------
TEST UNITS TEST DETECTION
PARAMETER RESULT LIMIT
------------------------------------------------------------------------
2310-pH by Method 150.1 9.3
2310-LDRL Ext. Met. S. EPA 1311 done
Multicomponent analysis: 2310-LDRL Metals EPA 6010
Lead ug/L Not Det 27.0
2322-Moisture EPA 160.3 % 26
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 -----------------------------------------------
Location code: CHAMP2 Loc. Desc.: S-10
LAB I.D. AA03938 P.O./Project No. AVM-2717 Client No. 12024
Collection Date: 11/14/90 Collection Time: 17:45
Submittal Date: 11/16/90 Submittal Time: 13:23
Sample collector: DCH
------------------------------------------------------------------------
TEST UNITS TEST DETECTION
PARAMETER RESULT LIMIT
------------------------------------------------------------------------
2310-pH by Method 150.1 8.9
2310-LDRL Ext. Met. S. EPA 1311 done

Mr. Mark Preddy
Page: 5
November 21, 1990
Sample AA03938 (continued)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
TEST _ UNITS TEST DETECTION
PARAMETER RESULT LIMIT
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Multicomponent analysis: 2310-LDRL Metals EPA 6010
Lead ug/L Not Det 27.0
2322-Moisture EPA 160.3 % 24
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Please advise should you have questions concerning these data.
Respectfully submitted,
J4mes M.G. Tticci, Operations Manager
,/
i

cc
U
W
Q
0
7
L
Z
�V
m
5
�
r�
w
N
I
�L
CI♦ �
a vj
J
°b O
o
�
y a
� d a
O ►- f-
N
'0
v • /
HIV � )/
W W
00
Z t�11 u
/J psi
O O
7
O
Z
O_
O
J
O F.
Za
'ON
�
S2l3NId1N00 JO
IL
1 d 101
1IL
a
utI Z
Z
r
C`r
a
I
O
Z
w
0
I
W
�
O
Z
J
_
MW
d
�
0UrMl
\A
1
Iri
W
F-I'dW
' A
d
�
O
Z
d
i
W J J
3 3 z c
W "
F� V N W
< J Z t,
O W
J F C H
u
_ O
WIWWOZ
O > m O m Y
F 0< O W Z
m u
m it
wU)ZO
< F _
< Z Y n
aV u ]W -t
W M � L
> 0u 1
N
c
-3
W z O c>r
I O i O<
H N v
7 - O c c
Q m 0
Z � m r_
J J � L
W o >
F- m
Z p i
Z c
_ N W
W w I c
7 a 0
L
< a u
m 3
r z }
m Z O
o aI a
2
W u ct
u u w
W Q W
� N J
w a
I < `-i
;�
a
W 0 a
O > _ In
m —
W O p
J Z u
< W
O > F
Z W.
a �
J
Z u l
u' Y
W ¢ Z
y O a p
F
W Z O
x
cc
z m Q
W {A
W
O �

Law Environmental, Inc.
Pensacola Branch
7215 Pine Forest Road
Pensacola, Florida 32526
November 21, 1990
Mr. Mark Preddy
Law Engineering, Inc.
Four Interchange Blvd.
Greenville, SC 29607
Clt #12024 Proj. #AVM-2717
Dear Mr. Preddy:
Below are results of analysis of 10
on November 16, 1990:
samples received for examination
Location code: CHAMP2 Loc. Desc.: 5-11 Pb only
LAB I.D. AA03972 P.O./Project No. AVM-2717 Client No. 12024
Collection Date: 11/15/90 Collection Time:.09:05
Submittal Date: 11/16/90 Submittal Time: 15:11
Sample collector: D. HENN
------------------------------------------------------------------------
TEST UNITS TEST DETECTION
PARAMETER RESULT LIMIT
------------------------------------------------------------------------
2310-pH by Method 150.1 7.-5
2310-LDRL Ext. Met. S. EPA 1311 done
Multicomponent analysis: 2310-LDRL Metals EPA 6010
Lead ug/L Not Det 27.0
2322-Moisture EPA 160.3 % 19.2
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Location code: CHAMP2 Loc. Desc.: 5-12 Pb only
LAB I.D. AA03973 P.O./Project No. AVM-2717 Client No. 12024
Collection Date: 11/15/90 Collection Time: 09:30
Submittal Date: 11/16/90 Submittal Time: 15:11
Sample collector: D. HENN
----------------------------------------------- ------------------------
TEST UNITS TEST DETECTION
PARAMETER RESULT LIMIT
------------------------------------------------------------------------
2310-pH by Method 150.1 7.8
2310-LDRL Ext. Met. S. EPA 1311 done
Multicomponent analysis: 2310-LDRL Metals EPA 6010
Lead ug/L Not Det 27.0
2322-Moisture EPA 160.3 % 31.6

Mr. Mark Preddy
Page: 2
November 21, 1990
Location code: CHAMP2 Loc. Desc.: S-13 Pb only
LAB I.D. AA03974 P.O./Project No. AVM-2717 Client No. 12024
Collection Date: 11/15/90 Collection Time: 10:00
Submittal Date: 11/16/90 Submittal Time: 15:11
Sample collector: D. HENN
------------------------------------------------------------------------
TEST UNITS TEST DETECTION
PARAMETER RESULT LIMIT
------------------------------------------------------------------------
2310-pH by Method 150.1
2310-LDRL Ext. Met. S. EPA 1311
12.3
done
Multicomponent analysis: 2310-LDRL Metals EPA 6010
Lead ug/L_ 263 27.0
2322-Moisture EPA 160.3 % - 46.5
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Location code: CHAMP2 Loc. Desc.: 5-14 Pb only
LAB I.D. AA03975 P.O./Project No. AVM-2717 Client No. 12024
Collection Date: 11/15/90 Collection Time: 10:30
Submittal Date: 11/16/90 Submittal Time: 15:11
Sample collector: D. HENN
------------------------------------------------------------------------
TEST UNITS TEST DETECTION
PARAMETER RESULT LIMIT
------------------------------------------------------------------------
23.10-pH by Method 150.1 8.2
2310-LDRL Ext. Met. S. EPA 1311 done
Multicomponent analysis: 2310-LDRL Metals EPA 6010
Lead ug/L Not Det 27.0
2322-Moisture EPA 160.3 % 21.2
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Location code: CHAMP2 Loc. Desc.: S-15 Pb only
LAB I.D. AA03976 P.O./Project No. AVM-2717 Client No. 12024
Collection Date: 11/15/90 Collection Time: 10:45
Submittal Date: 11/16/90 Submittal Time: 15:11
Sample collector: D. HENN
------------------------------------------------------------------------
TEST UNITS TEST DETECTION
PARAMETER RESULT LIMIT
=-----------------------------------------------------------------------
2310-pH by Method 150.1 7.8
2310-LDRL Ext. Met. S. EPA 1311 done

Mr. Mark Preddy
Page: 3
November 21, 1990
Sample AA03976 (continued)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
TEST UNITS TEST DETECTION
PARAMETER RESULT LIMIT
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Multicomponent analysis: 2310-LDRL Metals EPA 6010
Lead ug/L Not Det 27.0
2322-Moisture EPA 160.3 % 23.1
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Location code: CHAMP2 Loc. Desc.: 5-16 Pb only
LAB I.D. AA03977 P.O./Project No. AVM-2717 Client No. 12024
Collection Date: ll/.15/90 Collection Time: 11:00
Submittal Date: 11/16/90 Submittal Time: 15:11
Sample collector: D. HENN
------------------------------------------------------------------------
TEST UNITS TEST DETECTION
PARAMETER RESULT LIMIT
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
2310-pH by Method 150.1 7.7
2310-LDRL Ext.'Met. S. EPA 1311 done
Multicomponent analysis: 2310-LDRL Metals EPA 6010
Lead ug/L Not Det 27.0
2322-Moisture EPA 160.3 % 29.4
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Location code: CHAMP2 Loc. Desc.: S-17- Pb only
LAB I.D. AA03978 P.O./Project No. AVM-2717 Client No. 12024
Collection Date: 11/15/90 Collection Time: 11:15
Submittal Date: 11/16/90 Submittal Time: 15:_11
Sample collector: D. HENN
-------------------------------------- ----------------------------------
TEST UNITS TEST DETECTION
PARAMETER RESULT LIMIT
------------------------------------------------------------------------
2310-pH by Method 150.1 7.6
2310-LDRL.Ext. Met. S. EPA 1311 done
Multicomponent analysis: 2310-LDRL Metals EPA 6010
Lead ug/L Not Det 27.0
2322-Moisture EPA 160.3 % 23.9
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Mr. Mark Preddy
Page: 4
November 21, 1990
Location code: CHAMP2 Loc. Desc.: S-18 Pb only
LAB I.D. AA03979 P.O./Project No. AVM-2717 Client No. 12024
Collection Date: 11/15/90 Collection Time: 11:30
Submittal Date: 11/16/90 Submittal Time: 15:11
Sample collector: D. HENN
------------------------------------------------------------------------
TEST UNITS TEST DETECTION
PARAMETER RESULT LIMIT
------------------------------------------------------------------------
2310-pH by Method 150.1 7.2
2310-LDRL Ext. Met. S. EPA 1311 done
Multicomponent analysis: 2310-LDRL Metals EPA 6010
Lead ug/L Not Det 27.0
2322-Moisture EPA 160.3 % 28.4
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Location code: CHAMP2 Loc. Desc.: S-19 Pb only
LAB I.D. AA03980 P.O./Project No. AVM-2717 Client No. 12024
Collection Date: 11/15/90 Collection Time: 12:00
Submittal Date: 11/16/90 Submittal Time: 15:11
Sample collector: D. HENN
------------------------------------------------------------------------
TEST UNITS TEST DETECTION
PARAMETER RESULT LIMIT
------------------------------------------------------------------------
2310-pH by Method 150.1 7.3
2310-LDRL Ext. Met S. EPA 1311 done
Multicomponent analysis: 2310-LDRL Metals EPA 6010
Lead ug/L Not Det 27.0
2322-Moisture EPA 160.3 % 24.8
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Location code: CHAMP2 Loc. Desc.: S-20 Pb only
LAB I.D. AA03981 P.O./Project No. AVM-2717 Client No. 12024
Collection Date: 11/15/90 Collection Time: 12:30
Submittal Date: 11/16/90 Submittal Time: 15:11
Sample collector: D. HENN
------------------------------------------------------------------------
TEST UNITS TEST DETECTION
PARAMETER RESULT LIMIT
------------------------------------------------------------------------
2310-pH by Method 150.1 7.2
2'310-LDRL Ext. Met. S. EPA 1311 done

Mr. Mark Preddy
Page: 5
November 21, 1990
Sample AA03981 (continued)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
TEST UNITS TEST DETECTION
PARAMETER RESULT LIMIT
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Multicomponent analysis: 2310-LDRL Metals EPA 6010
Lead ug/L Not Det 27.0
2322-Moisture EPA 160.3 % 26.6
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Please advise should you have questions concerning these data.
Respectfully submitted,
I
Janes M.G. Tucci, Operations Manager
J

J
ti
P
iq�`'6 �vJ6 %
►- N
J W
g� d
U
O
O H
W
W W }
Z t i u
Z
_O
0 4
J
a
JI
SZi3NIV.LNOD jO 'ON
ILo IV1O1
m1,
N = Z
r 0
Z 4
u
N
W
O
ac
O Co 0o
W
iA
= a- 3 A
S
F- 1(
• soon
2 Z v
Z
W
flOi
111
�/\
✓�
1..
W
' C
swag
F
A}I. _i..16
J�j,'+�q,4!
�Z+
lT.'r.
f
,
_•Y.
t
_
W
H
W
H
<
O
m
c
W
W
u
W
C
3
i
W
i J 3
3 z 3 I
W C 0 O W
< 2
O�\ J C H � W
3 0_ W J 13 m
Z a 0 O 0
C ^ W. W W p Z G
O > n O h Y C
W W N
CO C W uooJJL�<
> m � C C d g Z O I
� a �
Z z id..
_
t! a n u W
00
� c
W W
}
Z W Z O Q
O I V 0
<
0 rc
Z(0 m
tt
W OF } �v e
W
W
�
z
z
Z }
Z
O
d O
a
W
W
>
>
W
W
i
�
V
u
c
W
W
C
C
o
W
W
�
C
7
i
c
i
'
F a
?
H
C
Z
W
_
C
Q`r�

Law Environmental, Inc.
Pensacola Branch
7215 Pine Forest Road
Pensacola, Florida 32526
November 21, 1990
Mr. Mark Preddy
Law Engineering, Inc.
Four Interchnage Blvd.
Greenville, SC 29607
Clt..#12024 Proj. #AVM-2717
Dear Mr. Preddy:
Below are results of analysis of 2
on November 20, 1990:
samples received for examination
Location code: CHAMP Loc. Desc.: Composite of S-1 thru S-10
LAB I.D. AA04019 P.O./Project No. AVM2717 Client No. 12024
Collection Date: 11/15/90
Submittal Date: 11/20/90 Submittal Time: 11:11
Sample collector:,D.H.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
TEST UNITS TEST DETECTION
PARAMETER RESULT LIMIT
2310-LDRL Ext. Met. S. EPA 1311 done
Multicomponent
analysis:
2310-LDRL Metals EPA
6010
Arsenic
ug/L
Not Det
1.0
Barium
ug/L
- 1350
2.0
Cadmium
ug/L
Not Det
4.0
Chromium
ug/L
10
8.0
Lead
ug/L
Not Det
27.0
Mercury
ug/L
Not Det
.1
Selenium
ug/L
Not Det
1.0
Silver
ug/L
Not Det
2.0
2321-LDRL Ext.
Herb. S.
EPA 1311
done
2322-LDRL Ext.
Semi S. EPA
1311
done
2321-LDRL Ext.
Pest. S.
EPA 1311
done
2322-Zero Head
Space Ext.
Soil
done
Multicomponent
analysis:
2241-LDRL Herbicides
EPA 8150
2,4-D
ug/L
Not Det
0.2
2,4,5-TP_
ug/L
Not Det
0.1
Multicomponent analysis: 2322-LDRL Volatiles EPA 8260
Benzene
ug/L
Not
Det
.2
Carbon tetrachloride
ug/L
Not
Det
.2
Chlorobenzene
ug/L
Not
Det
.2
Chloroform
ug/L
Not
Det
.1

Mr. Mark Preddy
Page: 3
November 21, 1990
2310-LDRL Metals EPA 6010 (continued):
Arsenic
ug/L
Not
Det
1.0
Barium
ug/L
1022
2.0
Cadmium
ug/L
Not
Det
4.0
Chromium
ug/L
Not
Det
8.0
Lead
ug/L
Not
Det
27.0
Mercury
ug/L
Not
Det
.1
Selenium
ug/L
Not
Det
1.0
Silver
ug/L
Not
Det
2.0
2321-LDRL Ext. Herb. S.
EPA 1311
done
2322-LDRL Ext. Semi S. EPA 1311
done
2321-LDRL Ext. Pest. S.
EPA 1311
done
2322-Zero Head Space Ext.
Soil
done
Multicomponent analysis:
2241-LDRL Herbicides EPA 8150
2,4-D
ug/L
Not
Det
0.2
2,4,5-TP
ug/L
Not
Det
0.1
Multicomponent analysis:
2322-LDRL Volatiles EPA 8260
Benzene
ug/L
Not
Det
.2
Carbon tetrachloride
ug/L
Not
Det
.2
Chlorobenzene
ug/L
Not
Det
.2
Chloroform
ug/L
Not
Det
.1
1,2-Dichloroethane
ug/L
Not
Det
.1
1,1-Dichloroethene
ug/L
Not
Det
.2-
Methyl ethyl ketone
ug/L
Not
Det
1.0
Pyridine
ug/L
Not
Det
50.0
Tetrachloroethylene
ug/L
Not
Det
.3
Trichloroethylene
ug/L
Not
Det
.3
Vinyl chloride
ug/L
Not
Det
.8
Multicomponent analysis:
2322-LDRL Semi -VOA EPA 8270
m-Cresol
ug/L
Not
Det
.7
o7Cresol
ug/L
Not
Det
.4
p-Cresol-
ug/L
Not
Det
.7
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
ug/L
Not
Det
.6
2,4-Dinitrotoluene,
ug/L
Not
Det
.7
Hexachlorobenzene
ug/L
Not
Det
.6
Hexachlorobutadiene
ug/L
Not
Det
.6
Hexachloroethane
-ug/L
Not
Det
.7
Nitrobenzene
ug/L
Not
Det
1.0
Pentachlorophenol
ug/L
Not
Det
1.6
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
ug/L
Not
Det
.9
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
ug/L
Not
Det
.8
Multicomponent analysis: 2321-LDRL Pest/PCB EPA 8080
Chlordane ug/L Not Det .05
Endrin ug/L Not Det .01

Mr. Mark
Page: 2
November
Preddy
21, 1990
2322-LDRL Volatiles EPA 8260
1,2-Dichloroethane
1,1-Dichloroethene
Methyl ethyl ketone
Pyridine
Tetrachloroethylene
Trichloroethylene
Vinyl chloride
Multicomponent analysis:
m-Cresol
o-Cresol
p-Cresol
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
Hexachlorobenzene
Hexachlorobutadiene
Hexachloroethane
Nitrobenzene
Pentachlorophenol
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
(continued):
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
2322-LDRL Semi -VOA
ug/L
ug/ L
ug/L
ug/ L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
EPA 8270
Not
Det
.i
Not
Det
.2
Not
Det
1.0
Not
Det
50.0
Not
Det
.3
Not
Det
.3.
Not
Det
.8
Not
Det
.7
Not
Det
.4
Not
Det
.7
Not
Det
.6
Not
Det
.7
Not
Det
.6
Not
Det
.6
Not
Det
.7
Not
Det
1.0
Not
Det
1.6
Not
Det
.9
Not
Det
.8
Multicomponent analysis:
2321-LDRL Pest/PCB EPA 8080
Chlordane
ug/L
Not
Det
.05
Endrin
ug/L
Not
Det
.01
Heptachlor
ug/L
Not
Det
.005
Heptachlor Epoxide
ug/L
Not
Det
.005
Lindane
ug/L
Not
Det
.005
Methoxychlor
ug/L
Not
Det
.05
Toxaphene
ug/L
Not
Det
.01
2322-Moisture EPA 160.3
%
29
2310-pH by Method 150.1
----------------------------------------------------------=--------------
3.7
Location code: CHAMP Loc. Desc.: Composite of S-11 thru S-20
LAB I.D. AA04020 P.O./Project No. AVM2717 Client No. 12024
Collection Date: 11/15/90
Submittal Date: 11/20/90 Submittal Time: 11:11
Sample collector: D.H.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
TEST . UNITS TEST DETECTION
PARAMETER RESULT LIMIT
2310-LDRL Ext. Met. S. EPA 1311 1 done
Multicomponent analysis: 2310-LDRL Metals. EPA 6010

Mr. Mark Preddy
Page: 4
November 21, 1990
2321-LDRL Pest/PCB EPA 8080
(continued):
Heptachlor
ug/L
Not
Det
.005
Heptachlor Epoxide
ug/L
Not
Det
.005
Lindane
ug/L
Not-Det
.005
Methoxychlor
ug/L
Not
Det
.05
Toxaphene
ug/L
Not
Det
.1
2322-Moisture EPA 160.3
%
25
2310-pH by Method 150.1
------------------------------------------------------------------------
8.8
Please advise should you have questions concerning these data.
Respectfully submitted,
s M.G. Tticci, Operations Manager

S
3
2
W J ;
3
33 Z3=
= L
J
Z
<
N a d 0 W
Z n We r N
< J
F
3 f Y J 13 N
�'
} Z�aa00
W I W W O Z O
0 > n 13 h Y �
_
< Z
a 0 �aW
3 N
J
W
� W Y V ` � <
7
m O
_
d
m
O
< 0 u°
h;
M o
A► gyp,•
w
o u
W
W
W
W
y0� of
W
I
Z
0
,:
W Z 0 m,
I
W
1-
>
""1
t! O
f-
o <
F�-
Z u
titi,�'
o
o m 0
W
0 o
yo 4
Z W c
J
\
O
0 a �
Z_
4 C
lit
SU3NIVINOD.AO 'ON
Z�
m
L X
TO
Iviol
It
IL
yZ
0
O O
O
a
o
O
W
1�
O� p < J
W w
VQ
V)
U
Y
u ucc
1
W
0
W
W< W
r N a
Z
W i
lb
tt
.s
t-
Q � O
,..
3•.
WesZ
OWNlit
W
r
j
-ti:
0
LL-
=az��
~
•��m
9
�.
•,�
��
, �= x •
W a
W
Im
r
F ItId
r
'Ir00
Z ti
t
r
,-

9 J
//y�,am�
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
Division of Solid Waste Management
P.O. Box 27687 - Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687
James G. Martin, Governor
William W. Cobey, Jr., Secretary
December 11, 1990
Mr. Robert Derric Brown
CMP Environmental Coordinator
Champion International Corporation
P.O. Box C-10
Canton, NC 28716
William L. Meyer
Director
Subject: One Time Disposal of Approximately 10,000 Yd3 of Excavation
Soil, Reinforced Concrete, Wood and Pipes at the Town of
Canton Landfill (Permit #44-04).
Dear Mr. Brown:
The Solid Waste Management Division has received a request for
characterization of the subject waste. Based upon the submitted
information, the waste appears to be non -hazardous. The Solid Waste
Management Division has no objection to the subject waste being added
to the 15,000 yd of caustic contaminated soil which was given short
term approval to remain in the landfill by a letter dated October 15,
1990. It is stipulated that both of these wastes are to be allowed
to remain at the targeted landfill for a short term provided the
9/26/90 Law Engineering recommendations are implemented as soon as
practical. It is further stipulated that a Law Engineering
recommended plan for long term protection of the ground water must be
approved by the Solid Waste Section if these wastes are to continue to
remain at the Canton Landfill (Permit #44-04). For completeness, the
short term plan recommendations are repeated below:
1. Flatten and track with dozer waste slopes to a 2.5H:1V
(horizontal to vertical slope).
2. Construct a rainfall run-on diversion ditch or berm
(asphalt curbing or soil) at the top of the waste pile
along the entrance road.
3. Construct a leachate collection toe drain as illustrated on
Figure 1.
4. Construct a leachate collection basin as illustrated on
Figure 2.
5. Place a 12" compacted soil layer on waste slope and top.
6. Grade top of waste pile to enhance runoff.
7. Grass slopes as soon as possible.
An Equal Opportunity Af rmadve Action Employer

Mr. Robert Derric Brown
December 11, 1990
Page 2
This short term approval is explicitly limited to a "one-time"
basis. When the forementioned long term plan recommendation is
received by the Solid Waste Section, review by Section personnel will
be required to make determination as to acceptability.
Meanwhile, failure to implement the above listed short-term
recommendations may result in revocation of this approval, and
subsequently, an administrative penalty. If you have further
questions or comments concerning this matter, please contact this
office at [phone].
Sincerely,
e 4C4_�
William R. Hocutt
Waste Determination Coordinator
Solid Waste Section
WRH/mju
cc: Jim Patterson
Julian Foscue
Leo Clayton

.. .W. �....*. . r , �.+�! yam. .T�'-�. - .. i•^•�,, �'... '... .. , �vv+., vM �. ../.�MrM'VM�T1•utnn •..
:IY VI' • ' A ��li Y!oil I /
IN
PEE will be IMW by the Smaid WasW mang4t.1t Divlsjm t:0 dolt
Wheth
'r a w©st-- e
is (1) 1 rs as diced by 12iA NC11,C 138, arxi (2) suitable for
dis :a1 at a :gal id •tr Wre ��;
ovaluaCe�d ' Mar
facLltY• 3Y,Q ty of that wi.11 be
"� Pry �*,� p 3t_lY, )= not e= usively, arxt
CloW exClal. Wastes and ,b.L :tW, Z"I Pll-+lx l=Y E 6MOK1 It atZK1,M W,arjM SjUC4 e.
Ole cn or W aw
lva ��q:3ms t►. Division m,clxvau the riot to rcc#VSL acldi Jcm1
inf�t;.y; �• waive sct>� o.� the
h°° Y• Division mar d,s baked W the type of w if it duao>s
the c'*rv0 Di :icy Wd to be t- rated or alb to render
domed at Sari � Y imooc�j,i,l,r� Prior U) n, c4x)s a..l at a sarej,t xy lndfill.
Viftlatco
Boa with t� ,,o,iid �1� Nwhidi can taa prxPOrly =Vm9W in
nr AP'IX171TAL. IM 1,,Zt= OF ZiiE
Mil1,X.L 11T,SC1 t➢i O i DjE OFit,,E?c a,, Oli'�17J�Znit OF ZriE L'%NLm'. LL 1' aCk M j)L,3jjCtAL.
`l"he f(:' ]agim infamatim = MWj,red tar an evaluation. � wauW
fOrw will be m4unm tad to the cJ0r=UtOr w1thcut rcvUW. An 4stexjsk*
da�3 inf=atim roi ire far 1(A,h--jy ownod Tr,,=,M W,,,. ( 1
A*
1. Naw p iONN and uai.l.iM address of facility or pOX,,�
-Champ
ion hicernatiorLI Car oration, WaStLm
9g> dt1i>Ig
(704) 64G-2000
i'lainutreet, P,U. Box C-c0, Canton, NC 28716
2. Spcicific: location of w -te (i. c�. sR. N, cxamty, city, eC�;... )
Champion International Corporation, Haywood County, Canon, N.C. 3* fit: the waste? Excav,ited Nc,i] nlar—Y-:iahi coiltalning reinfor and pipeced Concrete, wood
s,
4• Wbdt volume UI wi1l UU-4m be? I.eua than 10,UUU cubic
5- Mlat � Of --- Yards
6. �p.ialn either gtj w]1]. ttlGro bkD? Daily -10.-hour aY3 wNe s
man>� uX7 prvc�es:► or thc� waste
zone has been c�;;c�zvated for Cons[r►1CCinr1 was of a new fiber line bui l Tha � —
uevF 1 ruc�ur,l^
s �mrc�nr �1�it 1tA7.h�Y rt� (x�► l�c�c �1� . E�Uo� �.. rs � wa_�-t:e 1 isteri urr3ex . 000�� � c:) (i , e. , a o cat 26�.. 31 � 2 6 . d 7 2 ' r.t
7>Mr. No ) Yft. .).1st
*2 • D the waste �'.�ii )it J1W of the four ti]araCtfx'Z 'm3 as clef . (i.e., 40 CMI2 261.21-2G1.24)'? (Attach laboratory n=ults for q rled O (d)
C 1483ct1,V'tY, 19n'tabilitYi ivi.ty. )� No at=ty"
l » tares the waj�te Cone, any Juizal = tests constituents I - in . pOOb e
Appen iix vrxl (i.e., 40 csR 261, () .
r�ati.«►? h �'x VM)? If Yam. w1lat tit>,x�rrts anct Barium 1.19 Pp ( ttadl 1< a n�„lt") Load lEi.B pprn, chrOwium 0.005 ppm- t
2. What other aonstitaielvt-; z.re prey rrt airl :in ghat a
cimnoentratwn.
(Attvedlldb0mt4WY molts) Cui- reinforced concrete, wood, and i es. The
w:.:tK cu„4u,....,c U16 f p P it li ._:. i; I'�G�ion.
3 • Will, UZZ harrJdr1 j arm u1spolad, or ttii s: 4risste
�-'r[r saatx c ti wh jt31
* 4. ��aiILYB a health hazardhazardox• n� i �a w to larr�il.]. Neli1L';slcf� >�y
DC7L•ty the wad c,pass1 PQrsQn e.L .
' the 'paint f,1tLx'# test far true j l ; ,- athod 909!5 in
S-W- H46)? (Ate labordtnxy rE: 1]tNo Ereo liquids. Average soil moisture 28q
*5- Mlich solid wimte � facUitty :is
and perni.t t1e. mbW i ncin, ? , Far (nan er of Zarnd V
---) •..tO� of Canton Landf-t11, Permit No 44-04
*6. ti' IJGQ the war;te
wiL] be c W 11 , vLm-W ' in LXLJIX ar cx:V ky um
tkItrels, back, etc.) 10 Cubic yard du,upc:rucks

ft,,mdjV am
_ i • F r
it
• • L • • • i • r n • . I • _ r l N • r 1 • : 1
e 11 • �• '• M, ft• •' •1 • •
• i' /1 • • 1 • • •
11 / ,• /, 1 m 11 ,1 ~ • tU levels.
•/IL• • levels
*mwI• L to • w Ci 1, it .her ,
.• /1 LS/• • •• C �7t
•! •/
✓� •iI 1 •
0 t r : • L7.11 l: • r ■ � �� IV �i►!!.�.iAA �� i i�.: i•rl��
any
. .
�Wa-st oil
• ; . • 1:
11 8
EM ►w2AMEW
me
�� �I.
ln�iujau
AR"�Ki(Lt
ao+llw
10i.4
l.00
d
1.0
a.01
IO.ao
U11n
5.0
O.Ob
0.40
W01CUW
%,0
D. fr►
0.50
NRdf A1j
0' 1
O. o0Q
O. Wj
SA"IM
1.0
0. 47
5.a
O•JU
O.
0.50
102q'm3uw
0.0j
O.00M
0.0(1]
���
0.0011
_
0.002
x
0� 0.
U. ll()0/
�tWA
10.
0.10
0.04
2.4-0
u.:,rl
o.ary
1.00
4.4 'r-W
10.00
0.10
0,05
1.(111
u.u1
1.00
rycuftim
u.to
f*hZ* ,,
CAA4KV1 1pnvd2uxu=
0.5
0.00%
O U."dA*)N A ft
f1. 5
0. M*
0fLU DAI"
t00.0
_
0-0 p-Ax.
6,0
4--U OL
20o.0
_
1`-MWL
;iw.0
_
!,4 U/(jl(afUrjrj:Fm
1.2 0It)1lnm nVOm
/•y
0.M
1,1 DIOluvo nrim- tg
0.5
u.0p5
�, 4 0j)4j njdttL1J►:tn;
10*-Va UAAOm am
11'
0, UcrJ
1uavkau"11.1,7-I•/TAQ]UC
11"AOU149IrIIA&W
wmuvr:, enra, Kell f
J.0
_
NI'nI y2crJkw
ZOU.O
_
14i1fA"Ifactijum
=•0
_
I'Affftrlal
100.0
_
1f11.'11W-3an"mm m
1, U
'111fgU"KAMrYUOA[
0:1
_
Z.4.5- ivIjC3llalrxyWAM
11.5
0.003
2.•,h-'fItY011101ONn1.Or.
40U.0
vxNYL naLmi
2.0
_
i that
0.1 O.0
the
��t ian rtt�eci '
to o2
and tO the best of
0.05
O,Oy
to
O.W
20
20
20
U.75
0.0
0.07
0.013
0.013
0.05
0.30
20
0.20
10
0.50
0.07
U. 0Y
40
0.20
u. fl2
regard to
MY kn wle and .
(Pnnt 7Y3Jglt:t) Derric Brown
( IUC
(title) F11vLro111111%11c-i1 Coordinator
AII (�w) Nove"Iber 3U 1990
'ate (� 9� 3^.()ii9� tlll.a "P�:'p,-t�t3ts�u be d.�c.'t[�r,� to th3
r itic CPX--W QM in
C131Plete all _rdormdtim, =Ljn, and tit to:
S111id [ 35to 14,�Li , Divisicrt; Solid Wastfi
P.Q. D= 27'687: lt�e. NC 27611 -� on
. 611
COMR FCUM 3151 Attu: Was1_0 pctanxlrotienl
Scpas REV. 1.1,/7/90

Capital Projects Office
23'/z Church Street
P.O. Box 1489
Canton, North Carolina 28716
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
UChampion
Champion International Corporation
December 18, 1990
Mr. Bill Hocutt
North Carolina Department of Environment
Health and Natural Resources
Solid Waste Management Division
Solid Waste Section
P.O. Box 27687
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687
Dear Mr. Hocutt:
Attached is the report from Law Engineering, which provides
an assessment of the long term potential impact of the No. 2
Fiberline excavation material on ground water at the Canton
Municipal Landfill, Permit Number 44-04. This report is in
response to your conditional approval of disposal of
approximately 15,000 cubic yards of excavation material from
Champion International Corporation's Canton Mill, on October
15, 1990. The Solid Waste Section conditional approval is
based on an acceptance of this long term ground water
assessment.
The excavation was required to permit foundation pile cap
construction of a new Fiberline associated with the Canton
Modernization Project. For the Fiberline foundation,
Champion excavated approximately 15,000 cubic yards of
material. The excavation zone was then backfilled with
engineering fill suitable for the support of a new building
floor slab.
As you know, Champion conducted extensive testing of this
excavation material prior to transport to the Canton
Municipal Landfill. Concentrations of barium, lead, and
methyl ethyl ketone were detected.in various soil samples.
The analysis indicates the soils are not hazardous based on
criteria established by the EPA or the State of North
Carolina for the characterization of a hazardous waste by the
TCLP. In addition, the detected concentrations are well
below the North Carolina landfill maximum.
The soil does not exhibit the characteristic of corrosivity
because the representative soil pH (EPA Method 9045) is 10.9
and not aqueous or liquid. The representative soil pH of
10.9 is far below the corrosivity limit of pH 12.5, if the
sample is aqueous.

Champion fnternaiiona! Corporation
Mr. Bill Hocutt
December 18, 1990
Page 2
Due to the elevated pH, the Solid Waste Section expressed
concern that the excavation material could impact ground
water pH at the Canton Municipal Landfill. This concern was
amplified by the first sampling of the Canton Municipal
Landfill monitoring well No. 2 which indicated an elevated pH
of 9.73. A second test of the Canton Municipal Landfill
monitoring well No. 2, on October 3, 1990 indicated a pH of
6.70, well below the pH of the first sampling.
To address this concern, Champion asked Law Engineering to
provide recommendations for the short term protection of
ground water. Law Engineering provided recommendations to
prevent leachate from the excavation material from migrating
to the ground water and eliminate rainfall infiltration. The
ground water protection plan is as follows:
1. Flatten and track with dozer existing waste slopes to
a 2.5H:1V (horizontal to vertical slope).
2. Construct a rainfall run-on diversion ditch or berm
(asphalt curbing or soil) at the top of the waste pile
along the landfill entrance road.
3. Construct a leachate collection toe drain as
illustrated in Appendix B, Figure 1 of the attachment.
4. Construct a leachate collection basin as illustrated
in Appendix B, Figure 2 of the attachment.
5. Place a 12" compacted soil layer on waste slope and
top.
6. Grade top of pile to enhance runoff
7. Grass slopes as soon as possible.
Steps 1-6 were completed at the Canton Municipal Landfill on
November 29, 1990. Step 7 was completed on December 14,
1990. Since installation„ the terminus of the toe drain at
the collection basin has been dry. The small volume of water
in the collection basin has a pH of 7.2. The water is
believed to have accumulated in the pond during recent
rainfall.

Champion InternationaMorporation
Mr. Bill Hocutt
December 18, 1990
Page 3
The attached Report of Assessment is Law Engineering's
assessment of the long term potential impact of the Fiberline
excavation material on ground water. The Report of
Assessment includes a detailed description of the methodology
Law Engineering used in the assessment, a discussion of the
results of the assessment, conclusions and recommendations,
Fiberline excavation material moisture content analysis
results, characterization of the excavation material, and the
short term ground water protection recommendations.
The assessment indicates that given the measured moisture
content, the calculated air volume in the void space and the
12-inch thick soil cover, it is anticipated that a
significant volume of water will nD_t be released from the
excavation material. Should any water with an elevated pH be
released from the excavation material, the evaluation
indicated that a more than ample ground water volume and flow
is available in the underlying water table aquifer to buffer
the pH to 8.5 or below. Based on Law Engineering's
observations, laboratory testing and evaluation, the ground
water underlying the Canton Landfill will not be
significantly impacted by the presence of the Fiberline
excavation material.
Champion will monitor the leachate retention pond every other
week including pH testing of any accumulated water for at
least 3 months. However, to date, no seepage has been
observed from the toe drain. Should any seepage occur, the
leachate will be neutralized, if necessary, and transported
to the Champion waste treatment plant for treatment.
If you have any questions or need additional information
please contact me at [phone].
Sincerely,
Derric Brown
Environmental Coordinator
Canton Modernization Project
attachment

Champion International Corporation
Copy: Mr. Julian Foscue III
Western Area Supervisor
310E. Third Street
Suite 200
Winton Salem, North Carolina 27106
Mr. Bill Hocutt
Solid Waste Management Division
Solid Waste Section
P.O. Box 27687
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687
Ms. Carolyn Merritt
Manager Solid Waste Programs
Champion International Corporation
One Champion Plaza
Stamford, Connecticut 06921
Mr. James E. Patterson
Rt.-1 Box 179
Hayesville, North Carolina 28904

Capital Projects Office
231,12 Church Street
P.O. Box 1489
Canton, North Carolina 28716
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Champion
C-.ampion International Cvrporanon
December 18, 1990
Mr. Bill Hocutt
North Carolina Department of Environment
Health and Natural Resources
Solid Waste Management Division
Solid Waste Section
P.0_ Box 27687
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687
Dear Mr_ Hocutt:
Attached are excavation material volume estimates for the
remainder of Champion International Corporation's Canton
Modernization Project. The information includes a
description of each excavation area, an estimate of the
excavation material volume at each excavation area, and the
number of samples in the composite. Discussed below is the
sampling and analytical methodology Law Engineering will use
to characterize this material. On December 13, I received
verbal approval from you for the proposed sampling and
analytical methodology.
The excavations are required to permit pile cap or spread
footer construction of tanks, pipe bridges and process
equipment. Pile cap or spread footing constructionis
anticipated to require excavations ranging from 2 to 7 feet
below the existing ground surface_
The Attachment, lists the excavation area number, a
description of each excavation, an estimate of excavation
material volume, and the number of samples in the composite.
Samples were collected from each excavation area for every
500 cubic yards of estimated excavation material in that area
on December 17, 1990. The samples were composited into 1
sample for analysis and characterization of that area. A
total of 9 area samples were sent to the laboratory for
analysis.
Test pits were excavated in randomly distributed locations
across the excavation areas. A backhoe was used to excavated
the majority of the test pits- When overhead constraints
restricted the use of the backhoe, a hand auger or a shovel
was used. The backhoe, hand auger, and shovel were steam
cleaned prior to performing each excavation to prevent cross -
contamination between sampling locations.

3mpron International Corporation
Mr. Bill Hocutt
December 18, 1990
Page 2
Law Engineering sampled the soil on December 17, 1990. Soil
samples were collected in 500-milliter and 2-ounce glass jars
with teflon lids. Sample containers were prepared from the
laboratory and certified sterile. The soil samples were
identifyied and shipped overnight in an insulated cooler to
Law Environmental National Laboratories in Pensacola, Florida
for analysis.
In the Laboratory, all 9 soil samples will be extracted by
the Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure (TCLP). The 9
composite samples will be individually analyzed for pH (EPA
Method 150.1) and the 8 selected metals (EPA Method 6010).
The laboratory results and Waste Determination Form will be
submitted to the Solid Waste Section for approval in January.
If you have any questions or need additional information
please contact me at [phone].
L�GGG<�
Derric Brown
Environmental Coordinator
Canton Modernization Project
attachment

C!,._,;rnicn International Corporation
ATTACHMENT
ESTIMATED EXCAVATION MATERIAL
CANTON MODERNIZATION PROJECT
CHAMPION INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION
CANTON, NORTH CAROLINA
NUMBER OF
AREA
AREA
ESTIMATED SOIL
SOIL SAMPLES
NUMBS
DESCRIPTION
VOLUME (yard3)
IN COMPOSITE
1
Hot and Warm
2,250
5
Water Tanks
2
No.l Fiberline
1,875
4
and No.5 Bridge
3
Tanks East of
1,875
4
No.2 Fiberline
4
Turpentine
2,250
5
Recovery
5
Cooling Tower
690
2
Filtered Water
Pipe Bridge
6
Pipe Bridge
300
1
Tower No.l
7
Lime Silo
675
2
and Slaker
8
Condensate
1,500
2i
Stripper and
Evaporator
Control Room-
9,
Oxygen Storage
634
2
Total Volume 12,049 Cubic Yards
1 Due to this area being in an existing road and the presence ,
of a concrete pad 2 soil samples were collected for the
composite sample.

;opy: Mr. juiian :oscue
Western Area Supervisor
-ICCEHNR
Solid Waste Section
310 E. 'Third Street
-uite 200
Winston Salem. North Carolina �:'7106
Ms. :arciyn Merritt
Manager Solid Waste Programs
f-hampion international Corporation
One Champion Plaza
Stamford, Connecticut 06921
Mr. jim Patterson
Waste Management Specialist
`iCEEHNR
:.:oiid Waste Section
Rt.j. Box 179
Hayesville. North Carolina 23904
3i! ' �tamey
earn ~Tanager. --antcn
:,cx j87
.:zntcr ';ortn arc-_ :a °"_�

Sfp TE q
+�L' ,MUM v��•'
�itrsc�i
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Re
Division of Solid Waste Management
P.O. Box 27687 - Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687
James G. Martin, Governor
William W. Cobey, Jr., Secretary
October 15, 1990
Orr
�990
Fa�c� sH°a�fh
William L. Meyer
Director
Mr. Robert--Derric--Brown
CMP Environmental Coordinator
Champion International Corporation
P.O. Box C-10
Canton, NC 28716
Subject: One Time Disposal of Approximately 15,000 Yd3 of Caustic
Contaminated Soil at the Town of Canton Landfill, (Permit
#44-04).
Dear Mr. Brown:
The Solid Waste Management Division has received a request for
characterization of the subject waste. Based upon the submitted
information, the waste appears to be non -hazardous. The Solid Waste
Management Division has no.objection to the subject soil remaining at
the targeted sanitary landfill for a short term provided the 9/26/90
recommendations from Law Engineering are implemented as soon as
practical. It is understood that a recommended plan for long term
protection of the ground water is forthcoming from Law Engineering in
early November, 1990. For completeness the short term plan
recommendations are repeated below with appropriate attachments
appended.
1. Flatten and track with dozer existing waste slopes to a
2.5H:1V (horizontal to vertical slope).
2. Construct a rainfall run-on diversion ditch or berm
(asphalt curbing or soil) at the top of the waste pile
along the landfill entrance road.
3. Construct a leachate collection toe drain as illustrated on
Figure 1.
4. Construct a leachate collection basin as illustrated on
Figure 2.
5. Place a 12" compacted soil layer on waste slope and top.
6. Grade top of waste pile to enhance runoff.
7. Grass slopes as soon as possible.
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

Mr. Robert Derric Brown
October 15, 1990
Page 2
This short term approval is explicitly limited to a "one-time"
basis. When the forementioned long term plan recommendation is
received by the Solid Waste Section, review by section personnel will
be required to make determination as to acceptability.
Meanwhile, failure to implement the above listed short-term
recommendations may result in revocation of this approval, and
subsequently, an administrative penalty. If you have further
questions or comments concerning this matter, please contact this
office at [phone].
Sincerely,
Gam-- ,-
William R.� Hoc��utt
Waste Determination Coordinator
Solid Waste Section
cc: Jim Patterson
Julian'Poscue
Leo Clayton

\ r
� \'� W
5 0
>Sui
_.11 0 ` LW
C) La4°_L<L jI W
o
w
J��vra 0 ZJl N
W—c < )
FF-
o
t
Co
l
LLJ
0
�'
?
z
a
z
a
r
UJ
z
Q
"
U
r
C.)
Lli
�
N
Li

u�
w
ULU
_ JWJ Z
j ! U
.J_j N
i 0. -C
«00 L_1_I
L I- -
ul
L LIJ�,. -''f (� w
uJ
x M w 4 L W
Ul) . m Q V)
N � �
CK
N
al
rL LU LL
CL Gl
Q
� �
J) V)
w U
�� LLJ o

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIROHMM, HEALTH AND NATURAL RESOURCES
SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT DIVISION
SOLID WASTE SECTION
PROCEDURE AND CRITERIA FOR WASTE DETEMONATION
This procedure will be used by the Solid Waste Management
Division to determine whether a waste is (1) hazardous as defined by
10 NCAC 10F, and (2) suitable for disposal at a solid waste
management facility.
The types of wastes that will be evaluated by this procedure are
primarily, but not exclusively, industrial and commercial wastes and
sludges, and Publicly Owned Treatment Works Sludges.
The Solid Waste Management Division reserves the right to
request additional information or waive some of the requirements
based on the type of waste if it deems necessary. The Division may
also require some wastes to be treated or altered to render the
wastes environmentally itmmobile prior to disposal at a sanitary
landfill. Wastes disposed at sanitary landfills must be non -liquid
which can be properly managed in accordance with the "Solid Waste
Management Rules". APPROVAL TO DISPOSE OF THE WASTE -SHALL AIM BE
OBTAINED FROM THE OWNER OR OPERATOR OF THE LANDFILL PRIOR TO
DISPOSAL.
The following information is required for an evaluation.
Incomplete waste determination forms will be returned to the
generator without review. An asterisk(*) denotes information
required for Publicly Owned Treatment Works.
A * GENERAL INFORMATION
1. Name, telephone number and mailing address of facility or person
generating waste Champion International Corportion,
[phone], Mainstraat,PO Box(` -I O Canton Nr 9R71 F,
2. Specific location of waste (i.e. SR. #, county, city, etc...)
Champion International Corporation Haywood Count'.. rnntnn NO
3. What is the waste? Excavated soil materials containing rainforced
Concrete wood and i s
4. What volume of disposal will there be? Approximately 15.000 cubic y
5. What frequency of disposal will there be?Daily/4-10hour days/6 wks
6. Explain either the manufacturing process or how the waste was
generated.The zone has been excavated for construction of a new
fiber line building and several tank structures.
B INFORMATION FOR HAZARDOUS (RCRA) DETERMINATIC0 (10 NCAC 1OF .0029)
1. Is the waste listed under .0029(e) (i.e., 40 CFR 261.31 -
261.33)? If yes, list number. No
*2. Does the waste exhibit any of the four characteristics as
defined by .0029(d) (i.e., 40 CFR 261.21-261.24)? (Attach
laboratory results for EP Toxicity.. Reactivity, Ignitability,
Corrosivity.) No

INFORMATION FOR LANDFILLING DETERMINATION
Note: The following are established maximum leachable (EP Tax)
contamination levels and pH for North Carolina Permitted
Sanitary Landfills. Chemical analyses should be made at
Minimum Detection Limits permitting assessment below the
maximum levels.(The pH range shown is for individual data
points. The average values accepted are normally 4.0-10.0).
METALS: PESTICIDES/HERBICIDES:
ARSENIC (ppm) 0.50 LINDANE (ppm) 0.040
BARIUM (ppm) 10.00 ENDRIN (ppm) 0.002
CADMIUM (ppm) 0.10 METHOBYCSLOR (ppm) 1.000
CHROMIUM (ppm) 0.50 TOX APEME ( ppm ) 0.050
LEAD (ppm) 0.50 2,4-D (ppm) 1.000
MERCURY (ppm) 0.02 SILVEX (ppm) 0.100
SELENIUM (ppm) 0.10
SILVER (ppm) 0.50 pH (2:1 vol/wt.) >2.0-<12.5
I. Does the waste contain any hazardous waste constituents listed
in .0029(e), Appendix VIII (i.e., 40 CPR 261, Appendix VIII)? If
yes, what constituents and what concentration? (Attach
laboratory results) Lead 0.34 ppm Barium 1.0 ppm, Methyl ethyl.
ketone 0.65 npm
2. What other constituents are present and in what concentration?'
(Attach laboratory results) 4ni1, reinfnrr_d rnn r wood. and Wipes
The waste contains no 1iguid fracrion.
3. Will the handling and disposal of this waste create dust
emissions which may cause a health hazard or nuisance to
landfill personnel. No
*4. Does the waste pass the "paint filter" test for free liquids
(Method 9095 in S.W. 846)? (Attach laboratory results)Yes
*5. Which solid waste management facility is the request for (name
of landfill and permit number, incinerator, etc...)?
Town of Canton Landfill, Permit No. 44-04
*6. Specify how the waste will be delivered - in bulk or containers
(i.e. barrels, bags, etc.)10 cubic yard dump trucks
"I hereby certify that the information submitted in regard to
Rxcavatinn Matarig1a _(name of waste) is true and
correct to the best of my knowledge and belief."
(print name) Robert Derric Brown
( signature) _�� 2e"a Nagg,
(title) CMP Environmental Coordinator
(date) August-30, 1990
All questions concerning this "Procedure" should be directed to
the Solid Waste Section at [phone]. Answer specific questio:­::
in space provided. Attach additional sheets if necessary.
Complete all information, sign, and submit to:
Solid Waste Management Division
Solid Waste Section
P.O. Box 27687
Raleigh,..N.C. 27611-7687
Attn: Waste Determination
DE]1NR Form 3151 SWS REV • 9 /7 / `J

...ter ..

Auvust 18, 1990
Champion International Corporation
LAW ENGINEERING
5eotecrinical, environmental 8 construction materials consultants
FOUR INTERCHANGE BOULEVARD
GREENVILLE. SOUTH CAROLINA 29607
[phone]
c/o CRS Sirrine, Inc.
1041 East Butler Road;.
i
Greenville, South Carolina 29607 ,y' - . '
.-attention: Mr. Carroll C. Jones
Project Manager
Subject: Report of Soil Sampling and Analyses
Planned Soil Excavation Area
Number 2 Fiber Line Building - Canton Mill
Champion International Corporation
Canton, North Carolina
Law Engineering Project Number GVE-2620
Gentlemen:
As authorized by your acceptance of our Proposal Number GV90-950 dated June 22, 1990, Law
Engineering has completed the sampling and chemical analyses of soil samples from the area of
the planned Number 2 fiber line building at the subject site. This report describes the work
performed and the analytical results obtained along with our comments and recommendations.

Champion International Corporation
Law Engineering Job Number GVE-2620
August 28, 1990
Paae 2
We appreciate the opportunity to provide our professional environmental services during this phase
Of -your project. If you have any questions concerning this report, please do not hesitate to call.
Yours truly,
LAW ENGINEERING
George Y. Maalouf Thomas L. Lammons. P.G.
Hvdrogeologist Hydrogeologist
Environmental Services Manager
Daniel B. Bunnell. P.E.
Senior Geotechnical Engineer
Managing Principal
hp.b Registered, North Carolina #13814
cc: Mr. Derric Brown
Mr. Charley McKinish
Mr. Greg Conlon
Mr. Jeff Wylie
Mr. Tommy Sears

TABLE OF CONTENTS
PRO.IECI' INFORMATION ...................................... I
FIELD EXPLORATION ......................................... I
SOIL SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS ................................ 2
SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS .................................... 3
LABORATORY ANALYSIS RESULTS .............................. 4
SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS ........................... 5
QUALIFICATION OF REPORT ................................... 6
APPENDIX I - Laboratory Analysis Results
APPENDIX II - Toxicity Characteristic Constituents and Regulatory Levels
uw eHoiw�wwo

PROJECT' INFORMATION
The following project information was obtained in a meeting between Mr. Charles McKinnish of
Champion International Corporation and Messrs. Dan Bunnell and Tom Lammons of Law
Engineering on June 14, 1990. Additional site background information was obtained from our
Final Report of Geotechnical Exploration, Canton Optimization Project. dated May i9, 1990,
Law Engineering Job No. AV-2052.
The subject site is located at the Champion International Corporation, Canton pulp and paper mill
(Figure 1). We understand that part of a planned facility expansion will include construction of -
a fiber line building (No. 2) and several tank structures (Areas F and H, Figure 2). The area of
pianned construction formerly served as a wood yard that contained a debarking drum, salt piles,
and brine pits. The upper 8 to 13 feet underlying the construction area ground surface typically
consists of fill soil mixed with cinders, concrete, bricks, other construction debris and old
foundations. Champion will remove the upper 6.5 feet of fill materials prior to construction to
permit pile cap and shear strut construction. The excavation zone will be backfilled with
engineered fill suitable for the support of the new building floor slab.
Champion requested that Law Engineering submit a proposal to collect soil samples from the
excavation site. perform chemical analysis of the samples. and characterize the soils relative to the
Toxic Characteristic Leaching Procedure (TCLP) guidelines. Based on the results of chemical
analyses an approvable disposal option would be identified. It is Champion's intention to dispose
of the material in a permitted solid waste landfill.
1 P -M •• •
The planned excavation zone measures approximately 325 feet by 108 feet in area. Ten test pits
were excavated in randomly distributed locations across the area as shown on Figure 2. The depth

Champion International Corporation
Law Engineering Job Number GVE-2620
August 28. 1990
Paize 2
Of excavation at each test pit was determined based on the following criteria:
- 0.5 to 3 feet below the water table was encountered at the time of excavation:
1 to 3 feet below the fill -alluvial soil interface zone; or
- when buried construction debris prevented deeper excavation.
A backhoe, supplied by Champion, was used to excavate the test pits. To prevent cross -
contamination between sampling locations, the backhoe bucket was steam cleaned prior to
performing each excavation.
SOIL SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS
Soil samples collected from the test pit excavations were screened in the field for the presence of
volatile organic vapors using a Century 128, flame ionization, organic vapor analyzer (OVA).
The soils from each excavation exhibiting the highest OVA readings were sampled for laboratory
chemical analysis. In test pits where OVA readings were not detected, samples were collected near
the bottom of the excavation for analvses.
The soil samples P-1 through P-10 were collected in 4-ounce plastic and 8-ounce glass jars with
teflon lids. Sample containers were prepared from the lab and certified sterile. After the soils
were placed into the sample jars they were marked with identifying numbers and shipped in an
insulated container by overnight courier to the Law Environmental National Laboratories in
Kennesaw, Georgia for analysis. Appropriate chain -of -custody records were maintained (Appendix
I).
In the laboratory the soil samples were extracted by the Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure
(TCLP). All TCLP extracts. (samples P-1 through P-10) were analyzed for the 8 TCLP metals (Ar,

Champion International Corporation
Law Engineering Job Number GVE-2620
August 28. 1990
Page 3
Ba. Cd, Cr, Pb, Hg, Se, Ag) and pH (EPA Method 9045). Additionally, sample extracts P-4 and
P-8 were analyzed for the characteristics of TCLP toxicity, corrosivity, ignitability and reactivity.
The TCLP toxicity analyses , include the 8 selected metals, pesticides (EPA Method 8080),
herbicides (EPA Method 8150), volatile organic compounds (EPA Method 8240) and acid
extractable and base neutral semi -volatile organic compounds (EPA iMethod 8270). A complete
table of the TCLP parameters and acceptable concentrations is provided in Appendix II.
SUBSURFACE CONDMONS
The material encountered in the excavation generally consisted of construction debris and various
till materials underlain by alluvial and residual soils. The construction debris consisted mostly of
bricks, metal bars, concrete slabs, crushed stone, gravel and railroad ties. The alluvial soil
consisted of sand and clay, and the residual soil consisted of sandy silt and silty sand. A tabulated
description of the subsurface conditions is presented below in Table 1:
Table 1
Substuboe CoodWoes
Planned Buzvation Zooe for
Number 2 Fiber Ilne Building Foundatiott
Champion International Carporatioa - Canton, North Catoliaa
Depth
Material to Total
Excavation Depth (ft) Type OVA (ppm) Water (ft) Depth (ft) 12emarks
?_1 0-1.5 sand and gravel 0 pit terminated
1.5-3.5 crushed stone 0 3 3.5 due to ground
water
P-2 0-1.5
sand, gravel and
20
lime
1.5-6
construction
7 6
debris. sand. gravel
and cinders
P3 0-3.5
sand. gravel
3.5 not encountered 3.5 obstruction
and construction debris
prevented
P-4 0-1.5
sand and gravel
10
1.5-3
crushed rock
3-6
cinders
2 00• 4.5
6-7
Red -brown fine to
10
coarse sandv silt
uw cpawecwu.o

Champion International Corporation
Law Engineering Job Number GVE-2620
August 28, 1990
Page 4
Depth
Material
to
Total
i_xcavation
Depth
(ft) Tvpe
OVA (ppm)
water (ft)
Depth (ft)
Remarks
(cont'd)
P-5
0-2
construction debris
zo
not encountered
obstruction
and cinders
prevented
2-3
railroad ties
3
deeper excavation
P-6
0-3
silty sand, gravel.
3.2
not encountered
3
obstruction
lime, cinders and
prevented
construction debris
deeper excavation
11-7
0-2
construction debris
7.2
not encountered
2
obstruction
prevented
deeper excavation
1'-8
)-3
construction debris,
70
not encountered
silty sand and gravel
3-7.5
silty sand and gravel
1000
7.5
11-9
0-6
silty sand.
10
not encountered
construction debris
and cinders
6-7.5
black -gray
80
7.5
micaceous tine to
medium sand -
alluvium
P-10
04).5
sand. gravel and
0.4
railroad ties
0.5-2
crushed rock
1
2-4
cinders
3
4
4-5
black -gray
5
micaceous silty
clav - alluvium
5-7
black -gray
5
7
micaceous siltv
fine sand
'Samples collected for chemical analyses of complete TCLP
listed parameters.
LABORATORY ANALYSIS RESULTS
A summary of the soil sample chemical analytical results and the field OVA measurements are
presented below in Table 2. Only those parameters which were detected by laboratory analyses
are listed. Concentrations of barium, lead and methyl ethyl ketone (MEK) were detected in
various soil samples as demonstrated in Table 2; however, these concentrations are below the
regulatory level established by, EPA for the TCLP.
uw awovuewua:

Champion International Corporation
Law Engineering Job Number GVE-2620
August 28, 1990
Page 5
Table 2
Qt®;ca1 Aoalysit Results
Sold Samples - Number 2 Fiber Line Building
Champion International Corporation - Catuoo, Noah Carolina
PARAMETER
P-1
P 2
P-3
P-t
P-5
P-6
P-7
P-8
P-9
P-10
REGULATORY LEVEL
Barium (ppm)
1.0
<0.5
0.75
0.59
?.5
<0.5
0.64
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
100
Lead (ppm)
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
3.4
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5
5
Methvl ethvl
NT
NT
NT
<0.1
NT
NT
NT
1.3
NT
NT
200
ketone (ppm)
Corrosivity
9.7
11.4
i 1.4
1.9
12.5
12.2
9.1
11.2
10.4
11.8
(pH units)
Reactivity (ppm)
Sulfide
NT
NT
NT
<500
NT
NT
NT
<500
NT
NT
500
Cvanide
NT
NT
NT
<250
NT
NT
NT
<250
NT
NT
50
Ignitabilitv (°F)
NT
NT
NT
>200
NT
NT
NT
>200
NT
NT
<140
OVA (ppm)
ND
20
3.5
200
20
3.2
7.2
100
30
1.0
NA
Reguiatory level established by the EPA for the TCLP to)acity characteristic.
pH regulatory level applies to aqueous waste with 50% water by weight.
NT = Not Ttsted
NA = Not Applicable
ND = Not Detected
SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Chemical analyses were performed on 10 soil samples collected from the planned construction site
of the Number 2 fiber line building. Sampling locations were determined in the field based on
OVA field screening and information from plant personnel. Two sampling locations, which
represented the "worst case" conditions from field screening, were analyzed for the complete list
of TCLP parameters. All other collected samples were analyzed for eight TCLP metals and pH.
Based on the criteria established by EPA for characterization of a hazardous waste by the TCLP,
the soils are not classified hazardous.

Champion International Corporation
Law Engineering Job Number GVE-2620
August 28, 1990
Page 6
According to Mr. Bill Hocutt of the Solid Waste Management Division in Raleigh, North Carolina.
if the soil is wet, it must pass a paint filter test or the water must be removed prior to disposal
in a sanitary landfill. Additionaily, the soil must meet all requirements set by public sanitary
landfills or private monofills accepting the soil.
Although the soil pH of sample P-5 is at the regulatory level for corrosivity of 12.5, the subject
material would not be classified hazardous unless it contained > 50% water by weight (40 CFR
Section 261.22 paragraph a 1).
QUALIFICATION OF REPORT
The activities and evaluative approaches used in this assessment are consistent with those normally
employed in soil assessments and waste management projects of this type. Our evaluation of site
conditions has been based on our understanding of the site and project information and the data
obtained in our exploration.
Regardless of the thoroughness of an environmental site assessment, there is always the possibility
that other forms of contamination are present at the site due to variability of subsurface conditions.
Therefore, it was not possible to identify all conceivable forms of contamination at this site. The
primary objective was to perform sufficient work to determine if petroleum contamination exists
in the soils in the underground storage tank excavation at the subject site. It was not the purpose
of this primary evaluation to determine the degree or extent of contamination at or adjacent to
the property.
This report has been prepared on behalf of and exclusively for the use of Champion International
Corporation. This report and the findings contained herein shall not, in whole or in part, be
disseminated or conveyed to any other party of used or relied upon by any other party, in whole
or in part without consultants prior written notice.
uw euo�wewwo

FIGURES

BM J 13c,,: I
r a �.�'...r, -ice--"' ,) I •'�-" 278-3
.-�,tn iarrwn So =1 - ] C,'1 hl.
•� 44
�y — � CJ =�'� �A� ! � '�� � fir• - -
�cn#
Sma
-- �_-! "���: r" vim• ,
I Ur - �Dl�aytJit^ �•
it/(�r �JJ �' �•: bc6 a.�f,Ji!v ''l .� _
mjNni\statlt7.�J :c
uostanan�_
9M lHT 1996 \ \ -'SRaA.niRhSrhR
\� �R � /^' J \ it .-"'•• �Y. "
�" ,l `�`�� fit- � � .�. _ _ .,,�,, � ' `• i� � - I -
ftolt Oggn
I �Additidar �'' ,ice - -✓ !, .aae i — \ i f
r c < Ftaheis Cakk -
f/_v"H avwood IChrmrviai l:h"✓�`�'i rb�� � ". •�n --,. - �vrtnYDO,rI t'�1 �'• n :.�•��-----'-ll� -�� � �\� 1~�.;1 ���
REFERS 4CE:
USGS TOPOGRAPHC MAP, CANTON, N.C.
QUADRANGLE. 7.5 AMNIRE SER ES. DATED 1967.
APPROXIMATE SCALE 1' = 20001
,E PRINT MACHINE,INC. '.78a36

too,
►4
1\
000
r
•
"6o P-1 P-3 Oil
O O P, P-10 P'7 0 00
P-2 O 506
O P-4 0 OZ�
F O L
69 U P-9 O I CONCR 522) 0
� � H FLooR O
0
\ � 0 12
.79C �>
D 61 r
(/�J Of
0
79A i �' O j �' ® 01 62, 13
O\Zlb v,o 0_� o
00 516 s 9 0 O 0 C� \
S7LEGEN46 �
\Z1 �
O SAMPLE LOCATION O � O
F NO. 2 FIBER LINE SCAL.E:1 1o0, LAW ENGINEERING
H . DIOXIDE TOWER GREENVI LLE, SOUTH CAROUNA
REFERENCE: AREA OF INVESTIGATION
PHOTOCOPIED FROM 'MASTER MILL PLOT PLAN, SOL SAMPUNG AND ANALYSIS, NO. 2 FIBER LINE
CONCENTRATED NCG PROJECT-. DPAW 4G No. CHAMPION INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION
100-A--001-A, PROVIDED By CRS Ste. DATED CANTON, NORTH CAROLINA
4/ 19/90.
JOB NO. AVE-2020 I I FIGURE 2
HE PRINT MACHINE,INC. - •:30036

LAW ENVIRONMENTAL. INC.
JUL ;
112 TOWNPARK DRIVE
KENNESAW. GEORGIA 30144-5599
.4: ».c l f tl —. " " 404-421-3400
July 13, 1990
Law Engineering, Inc.
Four Interchange Blvd.
Greenville, SC 29607
Attention: George Maalouf
LE Job Number: AVE-2620
Subject: Chemical Analysis of Samples Received on 06/30/90.
Dear Mr. Maalouf:
Law Environmental National Laboratories has completed its analysis
of your samples and reports the results on the following pages.
These results relate only to the contents of the samples as
submitted. This report shall not be reproduced except in full
without the approval of Law Environmental National Laboratories.
If there are any questions, please do not hesitate to contact us.
Sincerely,
LAW ENVIRONMENTAL NAT LABS
e -
Clifford H. McBride
QC Coordinator
Attachment: Data Report
Invoice

LAW ENVIRONMENTAL NATIONAL LABORATORIES
TEST DATA REPORT
Date 07/13/90
Page 1
--- Project Information ---
Lab Number 90-6335-01
Project No. AVE-2620 Cust. No.
Project Name CHAMPION
Manager: GEORGE MAALOUF
--- Sample Information ---
Station ID P-1 Sampled Date/Time 06/28/90 11:45
Matrix SO Received Date/Time 06/30/90 13:50
Type GRAB Received From/By DCH/GP
Collector DCH Chain of Custody 8604
Number of Containers 1
Remarks :
--- Test Data ---
Parameter .............................. Method.... Units PQL....... Results... Test Date Analy
-- INORGANIC CHEMISTRY RESULTS --
pH EPA 9040 units 2-12 9.7 07/09/90 GW
-- METALS ANALYSIS
- METALS PREP RESULTS --
Arsenic, TCLP
EPA
7060
mg/l
0.1
ND
07/10/90
DE
Barium, TCLP
EPA
6010
mg/1
0.5
1.0
07/10/90
DE
Cadmium, TCLP
EPA
7130
mg/1
0.1
ND
07/12/90
DE
Chromium, TCLP
EPA
7191
mg/l
0.005
ND
07/12/90
DE
Lead, TCLP
EPA
7420
mg/1
0.5
ND
07/11/90
KE
!Mercury, TCLP
EPA
7470
mg/1
0.1
ND
07/12/90
HH
Selenium. TCLP
EPA
i740
mg/1
0.1
ND
07/10/90
DE
Silver, TCLP
EPA
7760
mg/1
0.5
ND
07/11/90
KE
--- SERIES 35000
Total Metals Prep:
.aqueous ICP
EPA
3010
N/A
07/09/90
HH
Total Metals Prep:-
Aqueous AA Flame
EPA
3010
N/A
07/09/90
HH
Total Metals Prep:
Aqueous Furnace
EPA
3020
N/A
07/09/90
HH
Total Metals Prep:
aqueous, Hg
EPA
7470
N/A
07/11/90
HH
TCLP EXTRACTION
EPA
1311
N/A
07/05/90
HH
Signed

LAW ENVIRONMENTAL NATIONAL LABORATORIES
TEST DATA REPORT
Date 07/13/90
Page 1
Lab Number 90-6335-02
Project No. AVE-2620
Project Name CHAMPION
Manager: GEORGE MAALOUF
Station ID
P-2
Matrix
SO
Type
GRAB
Collector
DCH
Remarks :
--- Project Information ---
Cust. No. .
--- Sample Information ---
Sampled Date/Time 06/28/90 13:10
Received Date/Time 06/30/90 13:50
Received From/By DCH/GP
Chain of Custody 8604
Number of Containers 1
--- Test Data ---
Parameter............................... Method.... Units PQL....... Results... Test Date Analy
-- INORGANIC CHEMISTRY RESULTS --
pH EPA 9040 units 2-12 11.4 07/09/90 GW
-- METALS ANALYSIS
- METALS PREP RESULTS --
Arsenic, TCLP
EPA
7060
mg/1
0.1
ND
07/10/90
DE
Barium, TCLP
EPA
6010
mg/1
0.5
ND
07/10/90
DE
Cadmium, TCLP
EPA
7130
mg/1
0.1
ND
07/12/90
DE
Chromium, TCLP
EPA
7191
mg/1
0.005
ND
07/12/90
DE
Lead, TCLP
EPA
7420
mg/1
0,.5
ND
07/11/90
KE
Mercury, TCLP
EPA
7470
mg/1
0.1
ND
07/12/90
HH
Selenium, TCLP
EPA
7740
mg/1
0.1
ND
07/10/90
DE
Silver, TCLP
EPA
i760
mg/1
0.5
ND
07/11/90
KE
--- SERIES 35000
Total Metals Prep:
Aqueous.ICP
EPA
3010
N/A
07/09/90
HH
Total Metals Prep:
Aqueous AA Flame
EPA
3010
N/A
07/09/90
HH
Total Metals Prep:
Aqueous Furnace
EPA
3020
N/A
07/09/90
HH
Total Metals Prep:
aqueous, Hg
EPA
7470
N/A
07/11/90
HH
TCLP EXTRACTION
EPA
1311
N/A
07/05/90
HH
/4 Signed C ham'! /

LAW ENVIRONMENTAL NATIONAL LABORATORIES
TEST DATA REPORT
Date 07/13/90
Page 1
--- Project Information ---
Lab Number 90-6335-03
Project No. AVE-2620 Cust. No.
Project Name CHAMPION
Manager: GEORGE MAALOUF
--- Sample Information ---
Station ID
P-3
Sampled Date/Time
06/28/90 13:45
Matrix
SO
Received Date/Time
06/30/90 13:50
Type
GRAB
Received From/By
DCH/GP
Collector
DCH
Chain of Custody
8604
Number of Containers
1
Remarks :
--- Test Data ---
Parameter .............................. Method.... Units PQL....... Results... Test Date Analy_
-- INORGANIC CHEMISTRY RESULTS --
pH EPA 9040 units 2-12 11.4 07/09/90 GW
-- METALS ANALYSIS
- METALS PREP RESULTS --
Arsenic, TCLP
EPA
7060
mg/1
0.1
ND
07/10/90
DE
Barium, TCLP
EPA
6010
mg/l
0.5
0.75
07/10/90
DE
Cadmium, TCLP
EPA
7130
mg/l
0.1
ND
07/12/90
DE
Chromium, TCLP
EPA
7191
mg/l
0.005
ND
07/12/90
DE
Lead, TCLP
EPA
7420
mg/l
0.5
ND
07/11/90
KE
Mercury, TCLP
EPA
7470
mg/1
0.1
ND
07/12/90
HH
Selenium, TCLP
EPA
7740
mg/l
0.1
ND
07/10/90
DE
Silver, TCLP
EPA
7760
mg/1
0.5
ND
07/11/90
KE
--- SERIES 35000
Total Metals Prep:
Aqueous ICP
EPA
3010
N/A
07/09/90
HH
Total Metals Prep:
aqueous AA Flame
EPA
3010
N/A
07/09/90
HH
Total Metals Prep:
Aqueous Furnace
EPA
3020
N/A
07/09/90
HH-
Total Metals Prep:
Aqueous, Hg
EPA
7470
N/A
07/11/90
HH
TCLP EXTRACTION
EPA
1311
N/A
07/05/90
HH
Signed

LAW ENVIRONMENTAL NATIONAL LABORATORIES
TEST DATA REPORT
Date 07/13/90
Page 1
Lab Number 90-6335-04
Project No. AVE-2620
Project Name CHAMPION
Manager: GEORGE MAALOUF
Station ID
P-4
Matrix
SO
Type
COMP
Collector
DCH
--- Project Information ---
Cust. No. .
--- Sample Information ---
Sampled Date/Time 06/28/90 14:10
Received Date/Time 06/30/90 13:50
Received From/By DCH/GP
Chain of Custody 8604
Number of Containers 3
Remarks : ALL ORGANIC ANALYSES PERFORMED ON TCLP EXTRACT.
--- Test Data ---
Parameter .............................. Method.... Units PQL....... Results... Test Date Analy
-- INORGANIC CHEMISTRY RESULTS --
Sulfide, Total Releasable SW 846-I mg/l 500 ND 07/05/90 GW
Cyanide, Total Releasable (HCN)" SW 846-I mg/kg 250 ND 07/05/90 GW
Corrosivity (pH) SW 846 units 2-12 8.9 07/03/90 GW
Ignitability (Flash Point) EPA 1010 F 75 >200 07/03/90 GW
-- METALS ANALYSIS - METALS PREP RESULTS --
Arsenic, TCLP EPA 7060 mg/1 0.1 ND 07/10/90 DE
Barium, TCLP EPA 6010 mg/1 0.5 0.59 07/11/90 DE
Cadmium, TCLP EPA 7130 mg/l 0.1 ND 07/12/90 DE
Chromium, TCLP EPA 7191 mg/l 0.005 ND 07/12/90 DE
Lead, TCLP EPA 7420 mg/1 0.5 ND 07/11/90 KE
Mercury, TCLP EPA 7470 mg/1 0.1 ND 07/12/90 HH
Selenium, TCLP EPA 7740 mg/1 0.1 ND 07/10/90 DE
Silver, TCLP EPA 7760 mg/l 0.5 ND 07/11/90 KE
--- SERIES 35000
Total Metals Prep: Aqueous ICP EPA 3010 N/A 07/09/90 HH
Total Metals Prep: Aqueous AA Flame EPA 3010 N/A 07/09/90 HH
Total Metals Prep: Aqueous Furnace EPA 3020 N/A 07/09/90 HH
Total Metals Prep: Aqueous, Hg EPA 7470 N/A 07/11/90 HH
TCLP EXTRACTION EPA 1311 N/A 07/05/90 HH
-- ORGANIC PREP RESULTS --
Ext/TCLP-Acid Extractable FR 51-114 N/A 07/04/90 CSH
Ext/TCLP-Base Neutral Extractable FR 51-114 N/A 07/04/90 CSH
Ext/TCLP/Herb FR 51-114 N/A 07/04/90 CSH
Ext/TCLP/Pest FR 51-114 N/A 07/04/90 CSH
Ext/Acid/Leachate 3510/8270 N/A 07/07/90 ,CSH
Signed `

LAW ENVIRONMENTAL NATIONAL LABORATORIES
TEST DATA REPORT
Date 07/13/90
Page 2
Lab Number 90-6335-04
Project No. AVE-2620
--- Test Data ---
Parameter .............................. Method.... Units PQL....... Results... Test Date Anaiy
-- ORGANIC PREP RESULTS --
Ext/Base Neutral/Leachate
3510/8270
N/A
07/07/90
CSH
Ext/Herbicides/Leachate
EPA
8150
N/A
07/09/90
CSH
Ext/Pest/Leachate
3510/8080
N/A
07/09/90
CSH
-- GC ORGANIC ANALYSIS RESULTS --
gamma-BHC (Lindane)
EPA
8080
ug/l
0.05
ND
07/11/90
PAB
Heptachlor
EPA
8080
ug/1
0.05
ND
07/11/90
PAB
Endrin
EPA
8080
ug/1
0.10
ND
07/11/90
PAB
Methoxychlor
EPA
8080
ug/l
0.50
ND
07/11/90
PAB
Toxaphene
EPA
8080
ug/1
1.0
ND
07/11/90
PAB
Chlordane
EPA
8080
ug/1
0.5
ND
07/11/90
PAB
--- SERIES 57000
2,4,5-TP (Silvex)
EPA
8150'
ug/1
0.10
ND
07/11/90
PAB
2,4-D
EPA
8150
ug/1
0.20
ND
07/11/90
PAB
--- SERIES 63000
Vinyl chloride
EPA
8240
ug/l
10
ND
07/09/90
PG
1,1-Dichloroethene
EPA
8240
ug/1
5
ND
07/09/90
PG
Chloroform
EPA
8240
ug/l
5
ND
07/09/90
PG
Carbon tetrachloride
EPA
8240
ug/1
5
ND
07/09/90
PG
Trichloroethene
EPA
8240
ug/l
5
ND
07/09/90
PG
Benzene
EPA
8240
ug/1
5
ND
07/09/90
PG
Tetrachloroethene
EPA
8240
ug/1
5
ND
07/09/90
PG
Chlorobenzene
EPA
8240
ug/1
5
ND
07/09/90
PG
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
EPA
8240
ug/l
5
ND
07/09/90
PG
Methyl ethyl Ketone
EPA
8240
ug/l
100
ND
07/09/90
PG
1,2-Dichloroethane
EPA
8240
ug/1
5
ND
07/09/90
PG
-- GC/MS ORGANIC ANALYSIS (A) RESULTS
--
2-Methylphenol
EPA
8270
ug/1
10
ND
07/13/90
ZG
4-Methylphenol
EPA
8270
ug/1
10
ND
07/13/90
ZG
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
EPA-8270
ug/1
10
ND
07/13/90
ZG
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
EPA
8270
ug/1
10
ND
07/13/90
ZG
Pentachlorophenol
EPA
8270
ug/1
50
ND
07/13/90
ZG
3-Methylphenol
EPA
8270
ug/1
10
ND
07/13/90
ZG
Hexachloroethane
EPA
8270
ug/1
10
ND
07/13/90
ZG
Nitrobenzene
EPA
8270
ug/1
10
ND
07/13/90
ZG
Hexachlorobutadiene
EPA
8270
ug/l
10
ND
07/13/90
ZG
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
EPA
8270
ug/l
10
ND
07/13/90
ZG
Hexachlorobenzene
EPA
8270
ug/1
10
ND
07/13/90
ZG
Pyridine
EPA
8270
ug/l
10
ND
07/13/90
ZG
-- Ext/Zero Headspace, TCLP RESULTS_--
Ext%Zero Headspace, TCLP
N/A 07/05/90 RB
Signed

LAW ENVIRONMENTAL NATIONAL LABORATORIES
TEST DATA REPORT
Date 07/13/90
Page 1
--- Project Information ---
Lab Number 90-6335-05
Project No. AVE2620
Project Name CHAMPION
Manager: GEORGE MAALOUF
Station ID P-5
Matrix SO
Type GRAB
Collector DCH
Remarks :
Cust. No. .
--- Sample Information ---
Sampled Date/Time 06/28/90 15:00
Received Date/Time 06/30/90 13:50
Received From/By DCH/GP
Chain of Custody 8604
Number of Containers 1
--- Test Data ---
Parameter .............................. Method.... Units PQL....... Results... Test Date Analy
-- INORGANIC CHEMISTRY RESULTS --
pH EPA 9040 units 2-12 12.5 07/09/90 GW
-- METALS ANALYSIS
- METALS PREP RESULTS --
Arsenic, TCLP
EPA
7060
mg/1
0.1
ND
07/10/90
DE
Barium, TCLP
EPA
6010
mg/1
- 0.5
7.5
07/11/90
DE
Cadmium, TCLP
EPA
7130
mg/1
0.1
ND
07/12/90
DE
Chromium, TCLP
EPA
7191
mg/1
0.005
ND
07/12/90
DE
Lead, TCLP
EPA
7420
mg/l
0.5
ND
07/11/90
KE
;Mercury, TCLP
EPA
7470
mg/1
0.1
ND
07/12/90
HH
Selenium, TCLP
EPA
7740
mg/1
0.1
ND
07/10/90
DE
Silver, TCLP
EPA
7760
mg/l
0.5
ND
07/11/90
KE
--- SERIES 35000
Total Metals Prep:
Aqueous ICP
EPA
3010
N/A
07/09/90
HH
Total Metals Prep:
Aqueous -AA Flame
EPA
3010
N/A
07/09/90
HH
Total Metals Prep:
Aqueous Furnace
EPA
3020
N/A
07/09/90
HH
Total Metals Prep:
Aqueous, Hg
EPA
7470
N/A
07/11/90
HH
TCLP EXTRACTION
EPA
1311
N/A
07/05/90
HH
Signed C- A/I e�

LAW ENVIRONMENTAL NATIONAL LABORATORIES
TEST DATA REPORT
Date 07/13/90
Page 1
--- Project Information ---
Lab Number 90-6i�5-nA
Project No. ATE-2620 _ Cust. No.
Project Name CHAMPION
Manager: GEORGE MAALOUF
--- Sample Information ---
Station ID
P-6
Sampled Date/Time
06/28/90 15:30
Matrix
SO
Received Date/Time
06/30/90 13:50
Type
GRAB
Received From/By
DCH/GP
Collector
DCH
Chain of Custody
8604
Number of Containers
1
Remarks :
--- Test Data ---
Parameter .............................. Method.... Units PQL....... Results.:. Test Date Analy
-- INORGANIC CHEMISTRY RESULTS --
pH
EPA
9040
units
2-12
12.2
07/09/90
GW
-- METALS ANALYSIS
- METALS PREP RESULTS --
Arsenic, TCLP
EPA
7060
mg/1
0.1
ND
07/10/90
DE
Barium, TCLP
EPA
6010
mg/1
0.5
ND
07/11/90
DE
Cadmium,.TCLP
EPA
7130
mg/l
0.1
ND
07/12/90
,DE
Chromium, TCLP
EPA
7191
mg/1
0.005
ND
07/12/90
DE
Lead. TCLP
EPA
7420
mg/l
0.5
3.4
07/11/90
KE
Mercury, TCLP
EPA
7470
mg/1
0.1
ND
07/12/90
HH
Selenium, TCLP
EPA
7740
mg/l
0.1
ND
07/10/90
DE
Silver, TCLP
EPA
7760
mg/1
0.5
ND
07/11/90
KE
--- SERIES 35000
Total Metals Prep:
Aqueous ICP
EPA
3010
N/A
07/09/90
HH
Total Metals Prep:
Aqueous AA Flame
EPA
3010
N/A
07/09/90
HH
Total Metals Prep:
Aqueous Furnace
EPA
3020
N/A
07/09/90
HH
Total Metals Prep:
Aqueous, Hg
EPA
7470
N/A
07/11/90
HH
TCLP EXTRACTION
EPA
1311
N/A
07/05/90
HH
Signed

LAW ENVIRONMENTAL NATIONAL LABORATORIES
TEST DATA REPORT
Date 07/13/90
Page 1
--- Project Information ---
Lab Number 90-6335-07
Project No. AVE2620 Cust. No.
Project Name CHAMPION
Manager: GEORGE MAALOUF
--- Sample Information ---
Station ID
P-7
Sampled Date/Time
06/28/90 15:50
Matrix
SO
Received Date/Time
06/30/90 13:50
Type
GRAB
Received From
DCH/GP
Collector
DCH
Chain of Custody
8604
Number of Containers
1
Remarks :
--- Test Data ---
Parameter .............................. ~Method.... Units PQL....... Results... Test Date Analy
-- INORGANIC CHEMISTRY RESULTS --
pH
EPA
9040
units
2-12
9.1
07/09/90
GW
-- METALS ANALYSIS
- METALS PREP RESULTS --
Arsenic, TCLP
EPA
7060
mg/l
0.1
ND
07/10/90
DE
Barium, TCLP
EPA
6010
mg/1
0.5
0.64
07/11/90
DE
Cadmium, TCLP
EPA
7130
mg/l
0.1
ND
07/12/90
DE
Chromium, TCLP
EPA
7191
mg/l
0.005
ND
07/12/90
DE
Lead, TCLP
EPA
7420
mg/l
0.5
ND
07/11/90
KE
Mercury, TCLP
EPA
7470
mg/l
0.1
ND
07/12/90
HH
Selenium, TCLP
EPA
7740
mg/l
0.1
ND
07/10/90
DE
Silver, TCLP
EPA
7760
mg/l
0.5
ND
07/11/90
KE
--- SERIES 35000
Total Metals Prep:
Aqueous ICP
EPA
3010
N/A
07/09/90
HH
Total Metals Prep:
Aqueous AA Flame
EPA
3010
N/A
07/09/90
HH
Total Metals Prep:
Aqueous Furnace
EPA
3020
N/A
07/09/90
HH
Total Metals Prep:-
Aqueous, Hg
EPA
7470
N/A
07/11/90
HH
TCLP EXTRACTION
EPA
1311
N/A
07/05/90
HH
Signed

LAW ENVIRONMENTAL NATIONAL LABORATORIES
TEST DATA REPORT
Date 07/13/90
Page 1
Lab Number 90-6335-08
Project No. AVE2620
Project Name CHAMPION
Manager: GEORGE MAALOUF
Station ID
: P-8
Matrix
: SO
Type
: GRAB
Collector
: DCH
--- Project Information ---
Cust. No.
--- Sample Information ---
Sampled Date/Time 06/28/90 16:20
Received Date/Time 06/30/90 13:50
Received From/By DCH/GP
Chain of Custody 8604
Number of Containers 3
Remarks : ALL ORGANIC ANALYSES PERFORMED ON TCLP EXTRACT.
--- Test Data ---
Parameter .............................. Method.... Units PQL....... Results... Test Date Analy
-- INORGANIC CHEMISTRY RESULTS --
Sulfide, Total Releasable
SW
846-I
mg/1
500
ND
07/05/90
GW
Cyanide, Total Releasable (HCN)
SW
846-I
mg/kg
250
ND
07/05/90
GW
Corrosivity (pH)
SW
846
units
2-12
11.2
07/03/90
GW
Ignitability (Flash Point)
EPA
1010
F
75
>200
07/03/90
GW
-- METALS ANALYSIS - METALS PREP RESULTS
--
Arsenic, TCLP
EPA
7060
mg/1
0.1
ND
07/10/90
DE
Barium, TCLP
EPA
6010
mg/1
0.5
ND
07/11/90
DE
Cadmium, TCLP
EPA
7130
mg/1
0.1
ND
07/12/90
DE
Chromium, TCLP
EPA
7191
mg/1
0.005
ND
07/12/90
DE
Lead, TCLP
EPA
7420
mg/l
0.5
ND
07/11/90
KE
Mercury, TCLP
EPA
7470
mg/1
0.1
ND
07/12/90
HH
Selenium, TCLP
EPA
7740
mg/l
0.1
ND
07/10/90
DE
Silver, TCLP
EPA
7760
mg/1
0.5
ND
07/11/90
KE
--- SERIES 35000
Total Metals Prep: Aqueous ICP
EPA
3010
N/A
07/09/90
HH
Total Metals Prep: Aqueous AA Flame
EPA
3010
N/A
07/09/90
HH
Total Metals Prep: Aqueous Furnace
EPA
3020
N/A
07/09/90
HH
Total Metals Prep: Aqueous, Hg
EPA
7470
N/A
07/11/90
HH
TCLP EXTRACTION
EPA
1311
N/A
07/05/90
HH
-- ORGANIC PREP RESULTS --
Ext/TCLP-Acid Extractable FR 51-114
Ext/TCLP-Base Neutral Extractable FR 51-114
Ext/TCLP/Herb FR 51-114
Ext/TCLP/Pest FR 51-114
Ext/Acid/Leachate 3510/8270
N/A 07/o4/90 CSH
N/A 07/04/90 CSH
N/A 07/04/90 CSH
N/A 07/04/90 CSH
N/A 07/07/90 CSH
` Signed ` � l

LAW ENVIRONMENTAL NATIONAL LABORATORIES
TEST DATA REPORT
Date 07/13/90
Page 2
Lab Number : 90-6335-08
Project No. : AVE-2620
--- Test Data ---
Parameter .............................. Method.... Units PQL....... Results... Test Date Analy
-- ORGANIC PREP RESULTS --
Ext/Base Neutral/Leachate
3510/8270
N/A
07/07/90
CSH
Ext/Herbicides/Leachate
EPA
8150
N/A
07/09/90
CSH
Ext/Pest/Leachate
3510/8080
N/A
07/09/90
CSH
-- GC ORGANIC ANALYSIS RESULTS --
gamma-BHC (Lindane)
EPA
8080
ug/1
0.05
ND
07/11/90
PAB
Heptachlor
EPA
8080
ug/1
0.05
ND
07/11/90
PAB
Endrin
EPA
8080
ug/l
0.10
ND
07/11/90
PAB
Methoxychlor
EPA
8080
ug/1
0.50
ND
07/11/90
PAB
Toxaphene
EPA
8080
ug/l
1.0
ND
07/11/90
PAB
Chlordane
EPA
8080
ug/l
0.5
ND
07/11/90
PAB
--- SERIES 57000
2,4,5-TP (Silvex)
EPA
8150
ug/l
0.10
ND
07/11/90
PAB
2,4-D
EPA
8150
ug/l
0.20
ND
07/11/90
PAB
--- SERIES 63000
Vinyl chloride
EPA
8240
ug/l
50
ND
07/09/90
PG
1,1-Dichloroethene
EPA
8240
ug/l
25
ND
07/09/90
PG
Chloroform
EPA
8240
ug/1
25
ND
07/09/90
PG
Carbon tetrachloride
EPA
8240
ug/l
25
ND
07/09/90
PG
Trichloroethene
EPA
8240
ug/1
25
ND
07/09/90
PG
Benzene
EPA
8240
ug/l
25
ND
07/09/90
PG
Tetrachloroethene
EPA
8240
ug/l
25
ND
07/09/90
PG
Chlorobenzene
EPA
8240
ug/l
25
ND
07/09/90
PG
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
EPA
8240
ug/1
25
ND
07/09/90
PG
Methyl ethyl Ketone
EPA
8240
ug/l
1000
1300
07/10/90
PG
1,2-Dichloroethane
EPA
8240
ug/l
25
ND
07/10/90
PG
-- GC/MS ORGANIC ANALYSIS (A) RESULTS
--
2-Methylphenol
EPA
8270
ug/1
10
ND
07/13/90
ZG
4-Methylphenol
EPA
8270
ug/l
10
ND
07/13/90
ZG
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
EPA
8270
ug/l
10
ND
07/13/90
ZG-
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
EPA
8270
ug/l
10
ND
07/13/90
ZG
Pentachlorophenol
EPA
8270
ug/l
50
ND
07/13/90
ZG
3-Methylphenol
EPA
8270
ug/l
10
ND
07/13/90
ZG
Hexachloroethane
EPA
8270
ug/l
10
ND
07/13/90
ZG
:Nitrobenzene
EPA
8270
ug/1
10
ND
07/13/90
ZG
Hexachlorobutadiene
EPA-8270
ug/1
10
ND
07/13/90
ZG
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
EPA
8270
ug/l
10
ND
07/13/90
ZG
Hexachlorobenzene
EPA-8270
ug/l
10
ND
07/13/90
ZG
Pyridine
EPA
8270
ug/l
10
ND
07/13/90
ZG
-- Ext/Zero Headspace, TCLP RESULTS --
Ext/Zero Headspace, TCLP
N/A 07/05/90 RB.
Signed �"✓� e�l�

LAW ENVIRONMENTAL NATIONAL LABORATORIES
TEST DATA REPORT
Date 07/13/90
Page 1
Lab Number 90-6335-09
Project No. AVE-2620
Project Name CHAMPION
Manager: GEORGE MAALOUF
Station ID
P-9
Matrix
SO
Type
GRAB
Collector
DCH
Remarks :
--- Project Information ---
Cust. No. .
--- Sample Information ---
Sampled Date/Time 06/28/90 17:10
Received Date/Time 06/30/90 13:50
Received From/By DCH/GP
Chain of Custody 8604
Number of Containers 1
--- Test Data ---
Parameter ............................. Method.... Units PQL....... Results... Test Date Analy
-- INORGANIC CHEMISTRY RESULTS --
pH ' EPA 9040 units 2-12 1o.4 07/09/90 GW
-- METALS ANALYSIS
- METALS PREP RESULTS --
Arsenic, TCLP
EPA
7060
mg/l
0.1
ND
07/10/90
DE
Barium, TCLP
EPA
6010
mg/l
0.5
ND
07/11/90
DE
Cadmium, TCLP
EPA
7130
mg/l
0.1
ND
07/12/90
DE
Chromium, TCLP
EPA
7191
mg/l
0.005
ND
07/12/90
DE
Lead, TCLP
EPA
7420
mg/l
0.5
ND
07/11/90
KE
Mercury, TCLP
EPA
7470
mg/l
0.1
ND
07/12/90
HH
Selenium, TCLP
EPA
7740
mg/l
0.1
ND
07/10/90
DE
Silver, TCLP
EPA
7760
mg/l
0.5
ND
07/11/90
KE
--- SERIES 35000
Total Metals Prep:
Aqueous ICP
EPA
3010
N/A
07/09/90
HH
Total Metals Prep:
Aqueous AA Flame
EPA
3010
N/A
07/09/90
HH
Total Metals Prep:
Aqueous Furnace
EPA
3020
N/A
07/09/90
HH
Total Metals Prep:
Aqueous, Hg
EPA
7470
N/A
07/11/90
HH
TCLP EXTRACTION
EPA
1311
N/A
07/05/90
HH
Signed

LAW ENVIRONMENTAL NATIONAL LABORATORIES
TEST DATA REPORT
Date 07/13/90
Page 1
Lab Number 90-6335-10
Project No. AVE-2620
Project Name CHAMPION
Manager: GEORGE MAALOUF
Station ID P-10
Matrix SO
Type GRAB
Collector DCH
Remarks :
--- Project Information ---
Cust. No. .
--- Sample Information ---
Sampled Date/Time 06/28/90 17:50
Received Date/Time 06/30/90 13:50
Received From/By DCH/GP
Chain of Custody 8604
Number of Containers 1
--- Test Data ---
Parameter .............................. Method.... Units PQL....... Results... Test Date Analy
-- INORGANIC CHEMISTRY RESULTS --
pH EPA 9040 units 2-12 11.8 07/09/90 GW
-- METALS ANALYSIS
- METALS PREP RESULTS' --
Arsenic, TCLP
EPA
7060
mg/l
0.1
ND
07/10/90
DE
Barium, TCLP
EPA
6010
mg/1;
0.5
ND
07/11/90
DE
Cadmium, TCLP
EPA
7130
mg/l
0.1
ND
07/12/90
DE
Chromium, TCLP
EPA
7191
mg/l
0.005
ND
07/12/90
DE
Lead, TCLP
EPA
7420
mg/l
0.5
ND
07/11/90
KE
Mercury, TCLP
EPA
7470
mg/1
0.1
ND
07/12/90
HH
Selenium, TCLP
EPA
7740
mg/l
0.1
ND
07/10/90
DE
Silver, TCLP
EPA
i760
mg/1
0.5
ND
07/11/90
KE
--- SERIES 35000
Total Metals Prep:
Aqueous ICP
EPA
3010
N/A
07/09/90
HH
Total Metals Prep:
Aqueous AA Flame
EPA
3010
N/A
07/09/90
HH
Total Metals Prep:
Aqueous Furnace
EPA
3020
N/A
07/09/90
HH
Total Metals Prep:
Aqueous, Hg
EPA
7470
N/A
07/11/90
HH
TCLP EXTRACTION
EPA
1311
N/A
07/05/90
HH
Signed

LAW ENVIRONMENTAL NATIONAL LABORATORIES
TEST DATA REPORT
Date 07/13/90
Page 1
Lab Number 90-6335-11
Project No. AVE-2620
Project Name CHAMPION
Manager: GEORGE MAALOUF
Station ID TRIP BLANK
Matrix W
Type GRAB
Collector
Remarks :
--- Project Information ---
Cust. No. .
--- Sample Information ---
Sampled Date/Time
06/28/90
Received Date/Time
06/30/90 13:50
Received From/By
DCH/GP
Chain of Custody
8604
Number of Containers
6
--- Test Data ---
Parameter .............................. :Method.... Units PQL....... Results... Test Date Analy
-- INORGANIC CHEMISTRY RESULTS --
pH
Ignitability (Flash Point)
--- SERIES 63000
Vinyl chloride
1,1-Dichloroethene
Chloroform
Carbon tetrachloride
Trichloroethene
Benzene
Tetrachloroethene
Chlorobenzene
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
Methyl ethyl Ketone
1,2-Dichloroethane
EPA
150.1
units
+/- 0.5
6.2
07/03/90
GW
EPA
1010
F
75
>200
07/03/90
GW
EPA
8240
ug/1
10
ND
07/09/90
PG
EPA
8240
ug/1
5
ND
07/09/90
PG
EPA
8240
ug/1
5
ND
07/09/90
PG
EPA
8240
ug/1
5
ND
07/09/90
PG
EPA
8240
ug/1
5
ND
07/09/90
PG
EPA
8240
ug/1
5
ND
07/09/90
PG
EPA
8240
ug/1
5
ND
07/09/90
PG
EPA
8240
ug/1
5
ND
07/09/90
PG
EPA
8240
ug/1
5
ND
07/09/90
PG
EPA
8240
ug/1
100
ND
07/09/90
PG
EPA
8240
ug/1
5
ND
07/09/90
PG
Signed �" "

11
2�.
20
<Z
�\b
3
W
� W
J 3
F- W O I
3 ; z c
W W ti ' , W
C \ J z . (3 W <
G J a H 0:J 3 o W J 2 3 U1
} Z� ^00
m/ W� W W 0 2 0
0 J0 w Z > < m
Q W Z
W e W V 7 0 N
W U O J d I<
7 m m 0 0 Z a I
< } J
m Z F- ' z w ..
O i0 < 0 UW
> N w h 70
> OV fi
W W to
U U . y
W I W
c
I� W
} I ] > > J ca CT
O ;< o < } 47
I m rn
] 7 O �
m oI }� j O I 0 _I M
z z J m i CAI J o J � �.
K ! r m
z V �{
S� u\
z a `1
Z oo i
_ � A4,
to w j
cr
-iV101 _
] Z a.
o cLL
Z
�,
J
>
>
J
LU
ni —ICI _I cell --I
M
S2i3Nlf/1N07 JO 'ON �I �i I I I -' ,�I 'D !
O
N
o
I
I
! I
i
izI}
z
U,
3 Li�c
N
'
F'
+
I
I
IO
�m10
H
¢
J LG-IlI
Q
0
Z
n
I
I
I
!
I
W
! >
—
W
>
'�
tL
w
} �I
I
U
m
i
U I
a
I
_
V
i
u
u
.9 L
O
Q
z i
0
U
O
t-
Z
N
!
-r
W
W
Q a ¢
t
Q
'z Z a "
a co
W 2 C) w-
<
2
W
3anOSI
Z
W
11
!-
'dw07
aQN,zo
-jz -Y7
a
O
Z
N
eraoi
Z
I
''IIII
WU.
�)
0
i
H
d
N
N
W W ¢ w
I I C K m a �l
� ! � w f �I�OoI
Z!W W O W '
OJ W !
Z
I
j
I
i
I
i
I
I
j
\�
W
m
J a S
¢ O CU
Z n.
2 Y J
W
W
_ X Z
O a 4
m
<
O
<
Z a- c
z
W
z
0
a
x
(i
a
a
h
U1
Y
Q
Q
w
W
{~/j
W
O m

APPENDIX II
Toxicity Characteristic Constituents
and Regulatory Levels

TOXICITY CHARACTERISTIC CONSTITUENTS
S
AND REGULATORY LEVELS
0-O
METALS
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Lead
Mercury
Selenium
Silver
PESTICIDES (GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY)
Chlordane
Endrin
Gamma-814C (Lindane)
Heptachlor
(and its hydroxide)
Methoxychlor
Toxaphene
HERBICIDS(GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY)
44-D
2,4,5-TP (Silvex)
TEST METHOD REGULATORY LEVEL. (PPM)
EPA 7060
5.0
EPA 6010
100.0
EPA 7130
1.0
EPA 7191
5.0
EPA 7420
5.0
EPA 7470
0.2
EPA 7740
1.0
EPA 7760
5.0
EPA 8080 0.03
EPA 8080 0.02
EPA 8080 0.4
EPA 8080 0.008
EPA 8080 10.0
EPA 8080 0.5
EPA 8150 10.0
EPA 8150 1.0
VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS (GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY/MASS SPECTROMETRY)
Benzene
EPA 8240
0.5
Carbon Tetrachloride
EPA 8240
0.5
Chlorobenzene
EPA 8240
100.0
Chloroform
EPA 8240
6.0
1. 4-Dichlorobenzene
EPA 8240
7.5
1, 2-Dichloroethane
EPA 8240
0.5
1, I-Dichloroethene
EPA 8240
0.7
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
EPA 8240
200.0
Tetrachloroethene
EPA 8240
0.7
Trichloroethene
EPA 8240
0.5
Vinyl Chloride
EPA 8240
0.2
SEMI VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS (GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY/MASS SPECTROMETRY)
2, 4-Dinitrotoluene
EPA 8270
0.13
Hcmchlorobenzene
EPA 8270
0.13
Hexachlotobutadiene
EPA 8270
0.5
Hcmchloroethane
EPA 8270
3.0
2-Methylphenol (o-Cresoi)
EPA 8270
200.00
3-Methylphenoi (m-Cresoi)
EPA 8270
200.0•
4-Methylphenol (p-Cresol)
EPA 8270
200.00
Nitrobenzene
EPA 8270
2.0
Pentachlomphenol
EPA 8270
100.0
Pyridine
EPA 8270
5.0
2,4,5-Triddorophenol
EPA 8270
400.0
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
EPA 8276
2.0

C HARACIERETIC
Reactivity
Total Releaseable Sulfide
Total Releaseable Cyanide
Cotrosivity (pH)
Igttitability (Flash Point)
HAZARDOUS CHARACIPRISPICS
AND REGUTATORY LEVELS
TEST MEMOD REGUTATORY LEVEL
SW 846-I
500 ppm
SW 846-I
250 ppm
EPA 9045
12.5 Units
EPA 1010
> 140' F
' If o-, m-, and p- cresoi concentrations cannot be differentiated. the total cresol concentration is used. The regulatory level for total cresol
is 200 ppm.

c.
-:
YI:
.ei

Champion International Corporation
Law Engineering Job Number AVM-2717
September 26, 1990
Page 3
RECONIlMiENDATIONS FOR PRET MINARY EARTHWORK ACTIVPI'IF5
1. Flatten and track with dozer existing waste slopes to a 2.5H:1V (horizontal
to vertical slope).
2. Construct a rainfall run-on diversion ditch or berm (asphalt curbing or soil)
at the top of the waste pile along the landfill entrance road.
3. Construct a leachate collection toe drain as illustrated on Figure 1.
4. Construct a leachate collection basin as illustrated on Figure 2.
5. Place a 12" compacted soil layer on waste slope and top.
6. Grade top of waste pile to enhance runoff.
7. Grass slopes as soon as possible.

LLJ
v)
Q
3
C�
t-
U)
�
X
LtJ
L1J
fy
WOW
> W J
OU)
�
U cn -
\
T.
1
0' e'
to
JCL Ulf
—CDO
Lli
I
O
O a
m
coo
,
ZU)
o> l
a�
j
z
o<Q
f-
W
j LU
f-
LLI
-
>
;
v)
1- o Z
W W
O
I Q
Q
UWO
d • •U
U
>
<YO
O Q
—
(IUU)
J=LL..
J
LU D
LLJ
�Q
N
-
o
Z
o�U)
In
O �
i
3 w0
O
Uf-Q
W U)
U)
U7
I- N
N
I
�.
U)
Lf) o
0
O
O L)J
W
o
3F-U
I
UZ
=
U
_
oo<
<
mC)
V)
ZZ�
Q"
3
J
2
LL
- F
O
ALL
-QF-
LuQ
X
N
F- �
11JLL3
-
J-
-
LL
o
Z LLJ
�Q
U) LL
LLJ U)
jl
it
—ii
Ilia
Z
O
F-
U
V
!.I
LU
w
0
z
-
-
LL
W
J
z
J
�
-
Q
W
J
o
U
m
O
°'
c
<
LL
C1
0
U
O
N
GO
O
i
Z
QO
`�'
a
Z
Z
z
I()
o
O
>
Z
w
-
CL
z
3
Q
Q
(
CL
=
z
U
U
o
�
N
LL
Lu
>
Ln
J
A
�s� 4ugiuun1y urauwtus

W -�
z
W z
mW F L
> O —
JJ =
—O U N
2n z
+ < v
z
OU /
U
O
LLJ
z
(r- Cl)
r—
OJ
VJ
<
N
Lf)W
002
I
Q
VJ
W
m
W
W
O
O
<
I u-
%
I
<
L
W
I
U
W
W
J
U
W
m
O
�.
>
_
W
O
`$
Q
U
N
�
U
QO
U
U
z
o
N
U
z
LLO
I
z
z
CD
' O
z
LL-
U
d
O
iE
l �o
` U
<
=
z
<
�
z w0
j
U
U
r
1I
_��
X F -
L—
N
J
ov)
W a-2
I
a-O
LL.
W
W
LL
<
3
i
--I
U
O
l
,
`i
_ ua�.r�o jYIJY�.��y Y6JIJYW■

Protection of
Environment
PARTS 190 TO 299
Revised as of July 1, 1989
MI &
�s
��,Ho Her�Ro�
�s1
< ZI
6 �I
L .ate/
1985 i'

iroenwntai Protection Agency § 261.20
i(3) It contains any of the toxic con- (b) The Administrator may list class-
VIII or types of solid waste as hazardous
irrg
_ s
ditueats listed in Appendix es
after considering any of the waste if he has reason to believe that
9
apices,
i'OilO g factors. the Administrator individual wastes, within the class or
that the waste is not caps- type of waste. typically or frequently
appcludea definition
ble of Posing a tial ent or are
w to
iar.
paten hazard to human health or hazardous found section
ti>�E environment when improperly 1004(5) of the Act.
transported or dis- (c) The Administrator will use the
{ed. stored, sec-
of, or otherwise managed: criteria for listing specified in this sec-
.rd.
posed
The nature of the toxicity pre- tion to establish the exclusion limits
de-
•(1)
+rented by the constituent. referred to in 4 261.5(c).
(i) The concentration of the constit-
_
went in the waste. Subpart C—Cha►acteristia of
:te
w
of
s. (iii) The potential of the constituent Hazardous Wasten.
or, MY toxic degradation product
-
' the constituent to migrate from the § 261.20 General.
waste into. the environment under the (a) A solid waste, as defined in
:JUtypes
Of improper management consid- § 261.2. which is not excluded from
ered in Paragraph (a)(3)(vii) of this
regulation as a hazardous waste under
h
he
- ,
section. § 261.4(b), is a hazardous waste if it
ex -(iv)
The persistence of the constitu-
habits any of the characteristics identi-
ent or any toxic degradation product
fied in this subpart.
of the constituent.
(v) The potential for the constituent (Comment: 1262.11 of this chapter sets
id-
Or any toxic degradation product of forth the generator's responsibility to deter -
the constituent to degrade into non- mine whether his waste exhibits one or
of the characteristics identified in this
harmful Constituents and the rate Of more
subpart)
we
degradation.
(vi) The degree to which the constit- (b) A hazardous waste which is iden-
:- uent or any degradation product of tified by a characteristic in this sub
the constituent bioaccumulates in eco- part, but is not listed as a hazardous
systems. waste in Subpart D. is assigned the
(via) The plausible types of improper EPA Hazardous Waste Number set
management to which the waste could forth in the respective characteristic
be subjected. in this subpart. This number must be
MR) The quantities of the waste used in complying with the notifica-
generated at individual generation tion requirements of section 3010 of
:1Y
sites or on a regional or national basis. the Act and certain recordkeeping and
(ix) The nature and severity of the reporting requirements under Parts
human health and environmental 262 through 265. 268. and Part 270 of
damage that has occurred as a result this chapter.
n
of the improper management of (c) For purposes of this subpart, the
wastes containing the constituent. Administrator will consider a sample
- (x) Action taken by other govern- obtained using any of the applicable
mental agencies or regulatory pro. sampling methods specified in Appen-
grams based on the health or environ- dix I to be a representative sample
50
mental hazard posed by the waste or within the meaning of Part 260 of this
'
waste constituent. chapter.
(xi) Such other factors as may be ap- (Comment: Since the Appendix I sampling
propriate. methods are not being formally adopted by
x_
Substances will be listed on Appendix the Administrator. a person who desires to
li
VUI only if they have been shown in employ an alternative sampling method is
scientific studies to have toxic. carci- not required to demonstrate the equivalency
method the
e procedures set
or teratogenic ef-
nogenic. mutagemc Dund
fects on humans or other life forms. orth in
A
ve
(Wastes listed in accordance with (45 PR 33119. May 19. 1980. as amended at
these criteria will be designated Toxic 48 FR 14294. Apr. 1, 1983: 51 PR 40636. Nov.
wastes.) 7, 19861
4.- 427

§ 261.21
§ 261.21 Characteristic of ignitability.
(a) A solid waste exhibits the charac-
teristic of ignitability if a representa-
tive sample of the waste has any of
the following properties:
(1) It is a liquid. other than an aque-
ous solution containing less than 24
percent alcohol by volume and has
flash point less than 60'C (140'F), as
determined by a Pensky-Martens
Closed Cup Tester, using the test
method specified in ASTM Standard
D-93-79 or D-93-80 (incorporated by
reference, see § 260.11). or a Setaflash
Closed Cup Tester, using the test
method specified in ASTM Standard
D-3278-78 (incorporated by reference,
see § 260.11). or as determined by an
equivalent test method approved by
the Administrator under procedures
set forth in H 260.20 and 260.21.
(2) It is not a liquid and is capable.
under standard temperature and pres-
sure, of causing fire through friction,
absorption of moisture or spontaneous
chemical changes and, when ignited,
burns so vigorously and persistently
that it creates a hazard.
(3) It is an ignitable compressed gas
as defined in 49 CFR 173.300 and as
determined by the test methods de-
scribed in that regulation or equiva-
lent test methods approved by the Ad-
ministrator under § § 260.20 and 260.21.
(4) It is an oxidizer as defined in 49
CFR. 173.151.
(b) A solid waste that exhibits the
characteristic of ignitability, but is not
listed as a hazardous waste in Subpart
D, has the EPA Hazardous Waste
Number of D001:
(45 FR 33119. May 19, 1980, as amended at
46 FR 35247, July 7, 19811
§ 261.22 Characteristic of corrosivity.
(a) A solid waste exhibits the charac-
teristic of corrosivity if a representa-
tive sample of the waste has either of
the following properties:
(1) It is aqueous and has a pH less
than or equal to 2 or greater than or
equal to 12.5, as determined by a pH
meter using either an EPA test
method or an equivalent test method
approved by the Administrator under
the procedures set forth in § § 260.20
and 260.21. The EPA test method for
pH is specified as Method 5.2 in "Test
40 CFR Ch. 1 (7-149 EdMen)
Methods for the Evaluation of Solid
Waste. Physical/Chemical Methods"
( incorporated by reference. see
§ 260.11).
(2) It is a liquid and corrodes steel
(SAE 1020) at a rate greater than 6.35
mm (0.250 inch) per year at a test tem-
perature of 55'C (130'F) as determined
by the test method specified in NACE
( National Association of Corrosion En-
gineers) Standard TM-01-69 as stand.
ardized in "Test Methods for the Eval.
uation of Solid Waste, Physical/
Chemical Methods" (incorporated by
reference, see 1260.11) or an equiva-
lent test method approved by the Ad-
ministrator under the procedures set
forth in §§ 260.20 and 260.21.
(b) A solid waste that exhibits the
characteristic of corrosivity, but is not
listed as a hazardous waste in Subpart
D, has the EPA Hazardous Waste
Number of D002.
(45 FR 33119. May 19, 1980. as amended at
46 FR 35247, July 7, 19811
§ 261.23 Characteristic of reactivity.
(a) A solid waste exhibits the charac-
teristic of reactivity if a representative
sample of the waste has any of the fol-
lowing properties:
(1) It is normally unstable and read-
ily undergoes violent change without
detonating.
(2) It reacts violently with water.
(3) It forms potentially explosive
mixtures with water.
(4) When mixed with water, it gener-
ates toxic gases, vapors or fumes in a
quantity sufficient to present a danger
to human health or the environment.
(5) It is a cyanide or sulfide bearing
waste which, when exposed to pH con-
ditions between 2 and 12.5. can gener-
ate toxic gases, vapors or fumes in a
quantity sufficient to present a danger
to human health or the environment.
(6) It is capable of detonation or ex-
plosive reaction if it is subjected to a
strong initiating source or if heated
under confinement.
(7) It is readily capable of detona-
tion or explosive decomposition or re-
action at standard temperature and
pressure.
(8) It is a forbidden explosive as de-
fined in 49 CFR 173.51, or a Class A
explosive as defined in 49 CFR 173.53
428
'a; 6II.pameMal Protectit
or a Class B explosive
CFR 173.88.
(b) A solid waste tr
*� characteristic of react
listed as a hazardous v
- D, has the EPA H:
It Number of D003.
1261.24 Characteristic t
(a) A solid waste exh
teristic of EP toxicity
methods described in
equivalent methods r
Administrator under
set forth in it 260.20
extract from a repre
ofe contain!
the listed in I
centration equal to or
motive value give
Where the waste con,
percent filterable s
itself. after filtering.
be the extract for th
section.
(b) A solid waste
characteristic of EP
listed as a hazardou:
D, has the EPA
Number specified in
responds to the t
causing it to be haza
TAKE I —MAXIMUM Cot
TAMOMTS FOR CH,
TOXIC"
EPA
ioa u
............
coous:_a
.COME
00Y_.
Chanwra•••••
000s__».»_.. Lad ..............
Martyr._.......
o01o_..........»
0012.._...........
En0n
kXO.1.7+pc
1,4.4a.6.5.7
1.44nd0.
D013 _ -----•
ano*400ft
OCVCWCWM
1,M irot
2.24)16
pwpoleft
0015...............
Toxaphans 1,
drornaro
pwo" cn

LAW ENGINEERING
REPORT OF ASSESSMENT
SOIL FROM CHAMPION'S
NUMBER TWO FIBER LINE CONSTRUCTION
CANTON MUNICIPAL LANDFILL
CANTON, NORTH CAROLINA
LAW ENGINEERING JOB NUMBER AVM-2717

LAW ENGINEERING
geotechnieat, wwonmental 3 construction materials consuttants
FOUR INTERCHANGE BOULEVARD
GREENVILLE, SOUTH CAROLINA 29607
[phone]
December 18, 1990
Champion International
Post Office Box C-10
Canton, North Carolina 28716
Attention: Mr. Derric Brown
Subject: Report of Assessment
Soil From Champion's Number Two Fiber Line Construction
Canton Municipal Landfill
Canton, North Carolina
Law Engineering Job Number AVM-2717
Gentlemen:
As requested by Mr. Derric Brown on September 19, 1990 and as a follow-up to our letter
dated September 26, 1990, we have prepared a report to address the long term
considerations of the subject soil. Long term environmental effects on the ground water
of the Canton Municipal Landfill have been evaluated based on estimates of hydrogeologic
characteristics. The results of our evaluation and recommendations are presented.

Champion International
Law Engineering Job Number AVM-2717
December 18, 1990
Page 2
We appreciate the opportunity to provide our environmental professional services on this
project. Please contact us if you have any questions concerning this matter.
Sincerely,
LAW ENGINEERING
George Y. Maalouf
Hydrogeologist
Daniel' B. Bunnell, P.E.
Senior Geotechnical Engineer
Registered, North Carolina # 13814
LAW ENVIRONMENTAL
Thomas F. Beggs, P.E.
Principal
/pb.b

1.0 BACKGROUND INFORMATION
1.1 References
The following project information was obtained from the references listed below:
1. Report of laboratory analysis, dated May 1, 1990, Pace Project Number
600405.553.
2. Correspondence from Mr. Bobby Lutfy of the North Carolina Department
of Environment. Health, and Natural Resources to Mr. Roger Lyda of
Canton Public Works, dated August 10, 1990.
Report of soil sampling and analyses, dated August 28, 1990, Law
Engineering Job Number GVE-2620 (attached in Appendix A).
a. Site visits by representatives of Law Engineering and Law Environmental on
September 19, and November 8, 29, and December 4, 1990.
Report of Recommendations for Preliminary Earthwork Activities, dated
September 26, 1990, Law Engineering Job Number AVM-2717 with revised
toe drain sketches (Appendix B).
1.2 The Sod
Approximately 15,000 cubic yards of fill material consisting principally of soil, and
containing some construction debris were excavated from the Number Two Fiber Line
lww ENGINEEPING

Champion International
Law Engineering Job Number AVM-2717
December 18, 1990
Page 2 ,
Building area to allow for the foundation construction of the new building. Specifically,
the material was excavated to permit foundation pile cap and shear strut installation to
occur approximately 6 feet below the original ground surface for support of the planned
Number Two Fiber Line structure.
The fill soil consisted of silty fine to coarse sand and sandy clayey silt. The construction
debris consisted mainly of gravel, which was used as pavement base material, wood
fragments, rock and concrete fragments, roots and cinders (Table i). The material was
deposited over other municipal solid waste and a soil cover in the town of Canton,
Municipal Landfill (Figure 1). The soil was placed in a single pile near the entrance to
the landfill. Figure 2, attached, indicates the approximate location of the soil within the
landfill. The soil location is based on a visual estimate referencing site features and should
be considered approximate. It is planned to construct a scale house and entrance road
over the material.
1.3 Analytical Testing
Laboratory and field tests were performed on this material prior to excavation. Chemical
analysis was performed on samples from the material under the Toxic Characteristic
Leaching Procedure (TCLP) in June 1990. No TCLP constituents were detected in the
samples; however, an elevated pH was measured.
Paint filter tests were performed on samples from the Number Two Fiber Line Building
area during excavation of the material. These tests indicated that the tested material
contained no free liquid which could pass through a fine paint filter (60 mesh) after 5
minutes. The material is non -aqueous.

Champion International
Law Engineering Job Number AVM-2717
December 18, 1990
Page 3
1-4 The Landfill
The soil was placed in the town of Canton Municipal Landfill. Two ground -water
monitoring wells are located at the landfill, one upgradient (MW-1) and one downgradient
(MW-2) of the landfill. Depth to ground -water was measured by others during sampling
of these wells in May 1990 at 79.33 feet and 6.60 feet in MW-1 and MW-2, respectively.
Laboratory analyses performed on ground -water samples from these wells (see reference
number 1) indicated no significant ground -water contamination from the landfill (see
reference number 2). An elevated pH was measured in the ground -water sample from
MW-2. Additional testing of the ground water was performed by Pace Incorporated in
August, 1990 following proper well development. The most recent test results indicated
a lower pH (6.7) in the sample from MW-2.
1.5 Temporary Measures
A site visit was conducted on September 19, 1990 by Messrs. Dan Bunnell, Tom Beggs
and Dan Brewer of Law Companies. The area had experienced relatively heavy rainfall
prior to our visit. During the site visit, it was noted that rain water had ponded on the
soil and softened the surface. Some water was noted seeping out at the toe of the pile
at a few isolated locations.
Based on these field observations temporary recommendations were made to mitigate
further seepage of fluids through the stockpile. The recommendations included grading
and covering the pile with a 12-inch thick compacted soil laver and constructing a leachate
collection system around the pile toe with a plastic, double lined retention pond (see
u�W ENG�NEEPiN6

Champion International
Law Engineering Job Number AVM-2717
December 18, 1990
Page 4
reference number 5 and Appendix B). At the request of Champion, Law then undertook
an assessment to address long term considerations of the soil.
2.0 LONG TERM CONSIDERATIONS
2-1 Waste Characterization Definition
According to 40 CFR (Code of Federal Regulations) Part 2bl, Subpart C, Section 261.20
(a), a solid waste is defined as hazardous if it exhibits any of the following characteristics:
ignitability, corrosivity, reactivity, or toxicity (Appendix C). Previous laboratory tests have
confirmed that the material is not ignitable, reactive or toxic (Appendix C). Under the
same subpart, Section 261.22 (a) (1), a waste is considered corrosive if it is aqueous (more
than 50 percent by weight water) and has a pH less than or equal to 2 or greater than
or equal to 12.5. As noted in our earlier reports, the material is non -aqueous. The pH
was tested by EPA Method 9040 and averaged 10.9 at the 10 locations sampled.
Therefore, the material is classified as non -hazardous.
2.2 Assessment Methodology
Even though the solid material is classified as non -hazardous, concern has been expressed
by Champion that potential water seepage from the soil stockpile could have an elevated
pH and impact the site ground water. We have undertaken an evaluation to estimate the
potential volume of leachate and the impact such leachate may have. Our evaluation
methodology is discussed in the following paragraphs.
I
SAW ENOtNEEwiN4

Champion International
Law Engineering Job Number AVM-2717
December 18, 1990
Page 5
Theoretical estimations were performed based on several broad assumptions as noted
below. The calculations estimated the volume of leachate which could seep from the
stockpile, and the volume of water needed to buffer the leachate's high pH. Hydrological
estimations of the site ground -water flow were also made to determine the site ground
water available for buffering. It was also planned to sample any seepage from the soil pile
for pH testing to establish the initial pH range to be buffered.
To estimate the volume of moisture which could be released from the pile, both potential
rainfall infiltration and moisture release from self weight consolidation were considered.
The temporary measures outlined in our September 26, 1990 report (smoothing and
grading slopes to 2.5:1 (H to V) and surface compaction) were intended to remove the
possibility of significant rainfall infiltration. These measures appear to have been
successful.
It was estimated that the soil stockpile present at the time our study was initiated in late
September was on the order of 30 feet in height and had plan dimensions of
approximately 150 to 200 feet in length and 100 to 150 feet in width at the base with
rough 1 (H: V) side slopes. Based on our past experience with earth fills placed with
light dozer compaction it was estimated that on the order of one foot of settlement of the
soil could occur due to self weight consolidation. It was anticipated that this settlement
would occur over a period of 12 to 18 months with the bulk occurring over the first
several months after placement. This settlement will result in consolidation of the soil and
a reduction of the mass pore space occupied by air and water. Release of water could
result if sufficient moisture was available. Sampling and testing was undertaken as
discussed below to estimate the soil moisture content and to estimate the volume of water
which could exit in the pile.
I
"w ENOINEEFINU

Champion International
Law Engineering Job Number AVM-2717
December 18, 1990
Page 6
The evaluation methodology was next to compare the anticipated seepage volume with the
volume of water flowing beneath the site to determine if sufficient buffering would occur.
3.0 SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS
3.1 Soil Sampling, Analysis and Results
To determine if excess water would be released from the soil pile due to self -weight
consolidation, samples of the soil were collected and analyzed for moisture content.'
Twenty-three soil samples were collected from the soil pile on November 29, 1990.
Sample locations were selected by Law Engineering and were established in the field by
visual estimations referencing site features. The test pit locations should be considered
approximate. The samples were collected using a backhoe from eight excavation locations
at depths varying from 2 to 20 feet below surface (see Figure 2 for sample location and
Table 1 for sample depth). The samples were placed in air -tight glass jars with plastic lids
and analyzed for moisture content in the Law Engineering Laboratory in Greenville, South
Carolina. The water content tests were performed in general accordance with ASTM D-
2216. Laboratory analyses indicated that the moisture content of the samples ranged from
18.2% to 33.7% with an average value of 25.5%.
It is anticipated that the soils placed with light compaction and spreading using a dozer
would have dry unit weights on the order of 80 pcf. Assuming a specific gravity of 2.7
(typical for silty sands), on the 'order of 20 percent of the void space would be occupied
by air. Significant release of moisture from the materials is not therefore anticipated.
i
LAW ENG�NEER�NG

Champion International
Law Engineering Job Number AVM-2717
December 18, 1990
Page 7
3.2 Site Observations and Water pH Measurement
A water sample was collected from the lined retention pond adjacent to the stockpile
(Figure 2) on November 29, 1990. The pH of the sample was _measured as 6.8. The
water is believed to have accumulated in the pond during an overnight rain.
The soil pile was also observed by representatives of Law on November 8 and 29 and
December 4, 1990. No seepage or wet areas were visible at the toe of the slope during
these visits. Also, the toe drain, which had been installed during the week of November
12, was noted to be dry at its terminus at the collection basin.
3.3 VH Buffering Estimation:
The volume of water having a pH of 7.0 required to buffer a potential leachate having a
pH of 10.9 was calculated. An isolated buffering system in a neutral environment was
assumed.
Our analysis indicates that a volume of 250 gallons of water having a pH of 7.0 is needed
to buffer 1 gallon of leachate of 10.9 pH to a pH of 8.5.
3.4 Available Volume of Ground Water
Analvsis was performed to estimate the ground -water flow beneath the site using Darcy's
Law. The following assumptions were made:
AkI
W ...........

Champion International
Law Engineering Job Number AVM-2717
December 18, 1990
Page 8
An area of water -table aquifer beneath the Canton Municipal Landfill of
50,000 feet-.
Ground -water gradient having 70 feet of vertical drop over a 1000-foot
horizontal distance.
Hydraulic conductivity of RY gallons per day per foot-.
Based on these assumptions, a discharge volume of ground water present in the shallow
aquifer beneath the landfill is estimated to be on the order of 3.5 million gallons per day.
4.0 CON RENTS AND RECONUVIEENDATIONS
4.1 Conclusions and Recommendations
As noted above, as a result of shaping the soil pile to promote runoff, significant surface
water intrusion and infiltration is not anticipated. The water content analyses performed
on the 23 samples from the pile indicate water content values only slightly higher than that
of silty fine to coarse sand typically used as engineered fill. An average moisture content
of 25.5 percent does not indicate excessive or free moisture in the soil. Observations of
the soil pile during Law Engineering's site visits on November 8, 14, 29 and December 4,
1990 confirmed the absence of water seepage from the pile slopes and toe. The water
noted in the lined retention pond on November 29, 1990 having a pH of 6.8 is believed
to have been the result of overnight precipitation. Given the measured moisture content,
the calculated air volume in the void space and the planned 12-inch thick soil cover, it is
anticipated that a significant volume of water will not be released from the soil pile.
Should water with elevated pH be released from the pile, our preliminary evaluation
KI
UW ENOiNFEPiNG

Champion International
Law Engineering Job Number AVM-2717
December 18, 1990
Page 9
indicates that a more than ample ground -water volume and flow is available in the
underlying water table aquifer to buffer the pH to 8.5 or below.
It should be understood that the above theoretical calculations are based on broad
hydrogeologic assumptions. The estimations do not take into consideration the effect of
the organic content of the overburden material which would serve to further reduce the
pH. To the best of our knowledge, there are currently no models that simulate pH
changes in unsaturated organic soils.
Based on the above observations, laboratory testing and our evaluation, it is our opinion
that the site ground water will not be significantly impacted by the presence of this soil.
We recommend the following to confirm our evaluation.
:) Every -other -week monitoring of the retention pond including pH measurement of
water accumulation in the pond, if any, for a period of 3 months. Though no
seepage has been noted in our site visits from November 8 through December 4,
1990, observations should also be made as to whether flow or moisture is noted
in the toe drains.
') Should any seepage occur and should the pH of the seepage be above the North
Carolina ground -water standards of 8.5 (15 NCAC2L), the seepage from the toe
drains should be collected and treated. The seepage could be contained in a
holding tank and treated with a neutralizing agent (citric acid) to buffer the pH and
then transported to the Champion waste treatment plant for treatment.
• UW ENU�NEEPIN4

Champion International
Law Engineering Job Number AVM-2717
December 18, 1990
Page 10
5.0 QUALIFICATION OF REPORT
The activities and evaluative approaches used in this assessment are consistent with those
normally employed in soil assessments and engineering projects of this type. Our
evaluation of the site conditions has been based on our understanding of the site and
project information, the data obtained in our exploration and reasonable assumptions.
Should conditions be encountered or noted which vary from the observations or
assumptions stated above, Law Engineering should be contacted to review their impact on
our evaluation.
I
UW ENOiNEEPiNt:

TABLE 1 -
Moisture Content Analysis Results
Soil from Number Two Fiber Line Excavation
Champion International Corporation
Canton, North Carolina
Law Engineering Job Number AVM-2717
Test
Sample
Natural Water
Pit No.
No.
Depth.
FtXontent.
W % !Soil Description _
1
S-1
2
26.6
Brown, silty fine to coarse SAND with gravel and
:few wood fragments.
1
S-2
.4
20.0
Tannish brown silty fine to coarse SAND with rock
fragments and gravel.
2
S-1
2
21.8
Brown silty fine to coarse SAND
2
S-2
4
25.2
Tannish brown silty fine to coarse SAND with rock
fragments and gravel
S-3
6
29.3
Brown silty fine to medium SAND with few wood
fragments and gravel.
S-4
10
30.6
Tan sandv clavev SILT with gravel.
3
S-1
2
:23.3
:Reddish brown micaceous silty fine to coarse SAND
with concrete fragments and few root fragments.
3 S-2 4 Z0.1 Tannish brown silty fine to coarse SAND with gravel.
3 S-3 10 31.5 :,Brown sandy clayey SILT with gravel and few wood
'4
S-1
.2
129.4
i Brownish gray sandy clayey J1L1' with gravel ana tew
wood fragments.
4
S-2
6
32.9
i Brownish gray silty fine to medium SAND with few
roots and wood fragments.
4
S-30
10
;18.2
Reddish brown silty fine to coarse SAND with gravel
and cinders
1
S-4
20
18.9
Reddish brown silty fine to coarse SAND.
5
S-1
2
28.8
Brownish gray silty fine to coarse SAND with gravel.
few wood fragments and cinders.
5
S-2
6
23.6
YBrownish gray silty fine to medium SAND with gravel.
5
S-3
10
19.3
Brown silty fine to coarse SAND with gravel and
cinders.
5
S-4
20
.18.2
Reddish brown silty fine to medium SAND.
6
' S-1
4
33.7
Brownish gray sandy clayey SILT with gravel.
6
S-2
6
29.5
'Brownish gray silty fine to coarse SAND with few
1wood fragments and gravel.
7
S-1
4
26.6
Dark brown micaceous silty fine to coarse SAND.
7
S-2
6
24.7
Reddish brown silty fine to coarse SAND with gravel.
8
S-1
2
30.9
Brownish gray sandy clavev SILT.
8
S-2
4
24.5
Brownish tan sandy SILT with few root fragments.
/pb.b
2717-B 1
12-6-90
"w E-NEEPIN4

a+ STATE Q
d M,Y m n
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
Division of Solid Waste Management
P.O. Box 27687 • Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687
James G. Martin, Governor William L. Meyer
William W. Cobey, Jr., Secretary Director
January 30, 1990
Mr. Roger Lyda
Public Works Director
Town of Canton
P.O. Box 987
Canton, N.C. 28716
Re: The Ground -water Monitoring Plan For the Town of Canton Sanitary
Landfill (Permit #44-04)
Dear Mr. Lyda,
This letter is in reponse to the ground -water monitoring plan
that was recently submited to our office for the Town of Canton
landfill facility. As we discussed in our recent telephone
conversation, the Town of Canton should request in writing an
amendment to their permit to incorporate the additional tract of land
for buffer and monitoring purposes only. Since the monitoring wells
must be sited within the permitted boundaries of the landfill
facility, this will provide room for the downgradient well to be
located as sited on the map recently submitted to our office. With
this understanding, the proposed monitoring plan is approved with the
following conditions:
1. Monitoring wells should be located at the locations
indicated in the proposed monitoring plan. The wells are to
be placed within the permitted area for the solid waste
facility in areas free of garbage, refuse, or sedimentation.
2. The wells should be drilled to a depth (and likewise, the
screens placed at vertical locations) that will ensure that
future drought conditions, which may lower the water table,
will not render the monitoring system ineffective. Vertical
placement of the screens should be in the most hydraulically
conductive zones. Remarks on the Well Completion Records
should clearly indicate where the screens are placed, and
why the screens were placed at these depths.
3. Generally the wells should be screened in the saturated soil
zone. It is not necessary or .desirable to drill into the
bedrock, unless the water table is not encountered in the
soil or weathered rock material.

Page 2
4. The monitoring wells are to be constructed according to the
specifications in the "North Carolina Water Quality
Monitoring Guidance Document for Solid Waste Facilities"
as illustrated by the "Typical Monitoring Well Schematic"
enclosed.
5. The screen should be a maximum of 10 feet in length. The
sand pack should extend no more than 2 feet above the
screen. A bentonite seal of at least 1.0 foot should be
installed above the screened interval.
6.- Access roads should be constructed and maintained
ensuring that a clear unobstructed path, free from dense
vegetation, is available for four-wheel drive vehicles
providing access to each well.
Within 15 days of completion of well installation, a complete
and accurate Well Completion Record (DHS 3342) and Typical Well
Schematic should be submitted to this office for each of the
ground -water monitoring wells. In addition, please provide a summary
of the hydrogeological data accumulated for the landfill site from
the boring operation. Include boring logs and other pertinent
subsurface information.
Within 15 days of well installation, designate in writing to
this office the name of the contractor you have chosen to perform
your annual ground and surface water monitoring extractions, and the
date on which you plan to perform your annual sampling. If you have
further questions or comments, please contact our office at (919)
733-0692.
Sincerely,
lgaal�_ 4y�_
Bobby Lutfy
Hydrogeologist
Solid Waste Section
III
cc: Jim Patterson
Attachment

f+5rnr4��
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
P Division of Solid Waste Management
P.O. Box 27687 • Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687
Ja nes C, Martin, Governor
Wiu1� W. Cobey, Jr., Secretary
Mr. Roger Lyda
pub :IiC Works Director
TQW—Vi of Canton
Can -to,,, North Carolina
Re = Ivaluation of the
Sanitary Landfill
August 10, 1990
William L. Meyer
Director
28716
Ground-water4jnitoring Data at the Canton
(Permit #44 0
De ar Mr. Lyda,
Solid Waste Section has reviewed theuCantonts from
Landf ill. .
The wells install
s apling of the monitoring
not appear to be an indication of
it is not possible to draw definite conclusions on the basis
o � oaegsampling episode, there does
s3-c=4nificant ground water contamination from the landfill at this
time,
els
At the upgradient well only Manganese wev
as manganese isreported at found
e ceding the Drinking Water Standardat s.
n3 t .rail occurring throughout much of North Carolina
reportedeat well
tie established Standards. The f values
found to occur
�1er one is within the range of values commonly
nat�ally in this area.
The only high reading found for the downgradient well was for
AEI , This high pH reading
could be caused by one of two things.
_ ;ould be caused by leachate fromuld be
c ��ed by grout contamination from be developed
�I. At the next sampling this well shouldnluenceofgomythe grout.
to sampling in order to minimize any
for routine detection monitoring, the Solid Waste
Generally,
,'on requires that new monitoring wells
at1thetCantonhe s
e,�i sampling and once a year thereafter• Therefore g value
should be sampled agthis
Of areason hfor ddthe lhigh p
Ga will help in the evaluation
�-Athe downgradient well.
Sincerely,
;3w - Al`
Bobby Lutfy, Hydrogeologist
Solid Waste Section
Patterson

Capital Projects Office
231,z Church Street
P.O. Box 1489
Canton, North Carolina 28716
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
VChamoion .a TG!OR t' Qrt;atlo,.,al C_uJ rat!,
December 18, 1990
Mr. Bill Hocutt
North Carolina Department of Environment
Health and Natural Resources
Solid Waste Management Division
Solid Waste Section
P.0_ Box 27687
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687
Dear Mr. Hocutt:
Attached are excavation material volume estimates for the
remainder of Champion International Corporation's Canton
Modernization Project. The information includes a
description of each excavation area, an estimate of the
excavation material volume at each excavation area, and the
number of samples in the composite_ Discussed below is the
sampling and analytical methodology Law Engineering will use
to characterize this material. On December 13, I received
verbal approval from you for the proposed sampling and
analytical methodology.
The excavations are required to permit pile cap or spread
footer construction of tanks, .pipe bridges and process
equipment. Pile cap or spread footing construction is
anticipated to require excavations ranging from 2 to 7 feet
below the existing ground surface.
The Attachment, lists the excavation area number, a
description of each excavation, an estimate of excavation
material volume, and the number of samples in the composite_
Samples were collected from each excavation area for every
500 cubic yards of estimated excavation material in that area
on December 17, 1990. The samples were composited into 1
sample for analysis and characterization of that area. A
total of 9 area samples were sent to the laboratory for
analysis.
Test pits were excavated in randomly distributed locations
across the excavation areas. A backhoe was used to excavated
the majority of the test pits. When overhead constraints
restricted the use of the backhoe, a hand auger or a shovel
was used- The backhoe, hand auger, and shovel were steam
cleaned prior to performing each excavation to prevent cross -
contamination between sampling locations.

'hampion International Corporation
Mr. Bill Hocutt
December 18, 1990
Page 2
Law Engineering sampled the soil on December 17, 1990. Soil
samples were collected in 500-milliter and 2-ounce glass jars
with teflon lids. Sample containers were prepared from the
laboratory and certified sterile. The soil samples were
identifyied and shipped overnight in an insulated cooler to
Law Environmental National Laboratories in Pensacola, Florida
for analysis.
In the Laboratory, all 9 soil samples will be extracted by
the Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure (TCLP). The 9
composite samples will be individually analyzed for pH (EPA
Method 150.1) and the 8 selected metals (EPA Method 6010).
The laboratory results and Waste Determination Form will be
submitted to the Solid Waste Section for approval in January.
If you have any questions or need additional information
please contact me at [phone].
Derric Brown
Environmental Coordinator
Canton Modernization Project
attachment

- !! ,;)-; nternauonal Ccrromtion
ATTACHMENT
ESTIMATED EXCAVATION MATERIAL
CANTON MODERNIZATION PROJECT
CHAMPION INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION
CANTON, NORTH CAROLINA
NUMBER OF
AREA
AREA
ESTIMATED SOIL
SOIL SAMPLES
NUMBE$
DESCRIPTION
VOLUME (yard3)
IN COMPOSITE
1
Hot and Warm
2,250
5
Water Tanks
2
No.l Fiberline
1,875
4
and No.S Bridge
3
Tanks East of
1,875
4
No.2 Fiberline
4
Turpentine
21250
5
Recovery
5
Cooling Tower
690
2
Filtered Water
Pipe Bridge
6
Pipe Bridge
300
1
Tower No.l
7
mime Silo
675
2
and Slaker
8
Condensate
1,500
21
Stripper and
Evaporator
Control Room
9
Oxygen Storage
634
2
Total Volume
12,049 Cubic
Yards
1 Due to this area being in an existing road and the presence
of a concrete pad 2 soil samples were collected for the
composite sample.

Copy: Mr. Julian Foscue
Western Area Supervisor
NCDEHNR
Solid Waste Section
J10 E. Third Street
Suite 200
Winston Salem. North Carolina :7106
Ms. Carolyn Merritt
Manager Sold Waste Programs
Champion Internationai Corporation
One Champion Plaza
Stamford, Connecticut 06921
Mr. Jim Patterson
Waste Management Specialist
NCDEHNR
Solid Waste Section
Rt..', Box 179
Havesville, North Carolina 28904
'Ir. Sill Stamey
"jwn Manager. Canton
Sox 087
:anton. `aorta: �aroii na �Q?

Capital Projects Office
231/2 Church Street
P.O. Box 1489
Canton, North Carolina 28716
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
V Champion
Champion International Corporation
December 18, 1990
Mr. Bill Hocutt
North Carolina Department of Environment
Health and Natural Resources
Solid Waste Management Division
Solid Waste Section
P.O. Box 27687
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687
Dear Mr. Hocutt:
Attached is the report from Law Engineering, which provides
an assessment of the long term potential impact of the No. 2
Fiberline excavation material on ground water at the Canton
Municipal Landfill, Permit Number 44-04. This report is in
response to your conditional approval of disposal of
approximately 15,000 cubic yards of excavation material from
Champion International Corporation's Canton Mill, on October
15, 1990. The Solid Waste Section conditional approval is
based on an acceptance of this long term ground water
assessment.
The excavation was required to permit foundation pile cap
construction of a new Fiberline associated with the Canton
Modernization Project. For the Fiberline foundation,
Champion excavated approximately 15,000 cubic yards of
material. The excavation zone was then backfilled with
engineering fill suitable for the support of a new building
floor slab.
As you know, Champion conducted extensive testing of this
excavation material prior to transport to the Canton
Municipal Landfill. Concentrations of barium, lead, and
methyl ethyl ketone were detected in various soil samples.
The analysis indicates the soils are not hazardous based on
criteria established by the EPA or the State of North
Carolina for the characterization of a hazardous waste by the
TCLP. In addition, the detected concentrations are well
below the North Carolina landfill maximum.
The soil does not exhibit the characteristic of corrosivity
because the representative soil pH (EPA Method 9045) is 10.9
and not aqueous or liquid. The representative soil pH of
10.9 is far below the corrosivity limit of pH 12.5, if the
sample is aqueous.

Champion International Corporation
Mr. Bill Hocutt
December 18, 1990
Page 2
Due to the elevated pH, the Solid Waste Section expressed
concern that the excavation material could impact ground
water pH at the Canton Municipal Landfill. This concern was
amplified by the first sampling of the Canton Municipal
Landfill monitoring well No. 2 which indicated an elevated pH
of 9.73. A second test of the Canton Municipal Landfill
monitoring well No. 2, on October 3, 1990 indicated a pH of
6.70, well below the pH of the first sampling.
To address this concern, Champion asked Law Engineering to
provide recommendations for the short term protection of
ground water. Law Engineering provided recommendations to
prevent leachate from the excavation material from migrating
to the ground water and eliminate rainfall infiltration. The
ground water protection plan is as follows:
1. Flatten and track with dozer existing waste slopes to
a 2.5H:1V (horizontal to vertical slope).
2. Construct a rainfall run-on diversion ditch or berm
(asphalt curbing or soil) at the top of the waste pile
along the landfill entrance road.
3. Construct a leachate collection toe drain as
illustrated in Appendix B, Figure 1 of the attachment.
4. Construct a leachate collection basin as illustrated
in Appendix B, Figure 2 of the attachment.
5. Place a 12" compacted soil layer on waste slope and
top.
6. Grade top of pile to enhance runoff
7. Grass slopes as soon as possible.
Steps 1-6 were completed at the Canton Municipal Landfill on
November 29, 1990. Step 7 was completed on December 14,
1990- Since installation, the terminus of the toe drain at
the collection basin has been dry. The small volume of water
in the collection basin has a pH of 7.2. The water is
believed to have accumulated in the pond during recent
rainfall.

Champion International Corporation
Mr. Bill Hocutt
December 18, 1990
Page 3
The attached Report of Assessment is Law Engineering's
assessment of the long term potential impact of the Fiberline
excavation material on ground water. The Report of
Assessment includes a detailed description of the methodology
Law Engineering used in the assessment, a discussion of the
results of the assessment, conclusions and recommendations,
Fiberline excavation material moisture content analysis
results, characterization of the excavation material, and the
short term ground water protection recommendations.
The assessment indicates that given the measured moisture
content, the calculated air volume in the void space and the
12-inch thick soil cover, it is anticipated that a
significant volume of water will not be released from the
excavation material. Should any water with an`elevated pH be
released from the excavation material, the evaluation
indicated that a more than ample ground water volume and flow
is available in the underlying water table aquifer to buffer
the pH to 8.5 or below. Based on Law Engineering's
observations, laboratory testing and evaluation, the ground
water underlying the Canton Landfill will not be
significantly impacted by the presence of the Fiberline
excavation material.
Champion will monitor the leachate retention pond every other
week including pH testing of any accumulated water for at
least 3 months. However, to date, no seepage has been
observed from the toe drain. Should any seepage occur, the
leachate will be neutralized, if necessary, and transported
to the Champion waste treatment plant for treatment.
If you have any questions or need additional information
please contact me at [phone].
Sincerely,
�uu
Derric Brown
Environmental Coordinator
Canton Modernization Project
attachment

Champion International Corporation
Copy: Mr. Julian Foscue III
Western Area Supervisor
310E. Third Street
Suite 200
Winton Salem, North Carolina 27106
Mr. Bill Hocutt
Solid Waste Management Division
Solid Waste Section
P.O. Box 27687
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687
Ms. Carolyn Merritt
Manager Solid Waste Programs
Champion International Corporation
One Champion Plaza
Stamford, Connecticut 06921
Mr. James E. Patterson
Rt. 1 Box 179
Hayesville, North Carolina 28904

Capital Protects Office
2T.2 Church Street
P.O. Box 1489
Canton. North Carolina 28716
?eleohone:704 646-2733
!=ax: 704 646-2275
CChampion
Champion Internationai Corporation
October 8, 1990
Mr. Bill Hocutt
Environmental Chemist II
North Carolina Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Solid Waste Management Division
Solid Waste Section
P.0_ Box 27687
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687
Dear Mr. Hocutt:
Attached is the report from Law Engineering, which provides
recommendations for the short term protection of ground water
at the Canton Municipal Landfill, Permit Number 44-04, from
the No. 2 Fiber Line excavation materials. This report is in
response to the meeting held in Canton with the Solid Waste
Section on September 18, 1990.
In a telephone conversation Mr. Julian Foscue, Western Area
Supervisor, indicated Champion could proceed with the plan as
outlined in the attached report. Champion began traking the
slopes on October 1, 1990. All work outlined in the attached
recommendations should be completed by early November. A
recommendation for the long term protection of ground water
from the excavation materials is being developed by Law
Engineering. Champion will provide these recommendations to
you in early November.
Also attached is the -most recent pH analysis of the landfill
monitoring well #2 performed by Pace Inc. on October 3, 1990.
Test results indicate the monitoring well pH is 6.70 units.
This test indicates the ground water pH at well #2 is within
the 6.5-8.5 regulatory level established by the North
Carolina Department of Envirommnetal Management. The
landfill monitoring well pH results are significantly lower
than the first test results from July which indicated a pH of
9.73 units.

Mr. Bill Hocutt
October 8, 1990
Page 2
If you have any questions or need additional information
please contact me at [phone].
Sincerely,
Derric Brown
attachments (2)

Copy: Mr. Julian Foscue
Western Area Supervisor
NCDEHNR
Solid Waste Section
310 E. Third Street
Suite 200
Winston Salem, North Carolina 27106
Ms. Carolyn Merritt
Manager Solid Waste Programs
Champion International Corporation
One Champion Plaza
Stamford, Connecticut 06921
Mr. Jim Patterson
Waste Management Specialist
NCDEHNR
Solid Waste Section
Rt.l, Box 179
Hayesville, North Carolina 28904
Mr. Bill Stamey
Town Manager, Canton
P.O. Box 987
Canton, North Carolina 28716

ems_ 2ACHMENT 1
ImLAW ENGINEERING
geotechnical, environmental & construction materials consultants
FOUR INTERCHANGE BOULEVARD
GREENVILLE, SOUTH CAROLINA 29607
[phone]
September 26, 1990
Champion International Corporation
Post Office Box C-10
Canton, North Carolina 28716
(Via Fax [phone])
Attention: Mr. Derrick Brown
Subject: Report of Recommendations for Preliminary Earthwork Activities
Soil Removed from No. 2 Fiberline Excavation Stockpiled at
Canton Municipal Landfill Canton, North Carolina
Law Engineering Job Number AVM-2717
Gentlemen:
As requested on September 19, 1990, we have prepared the attached recommendations
for providing temporary cover for the subject material. The purpose of our
recommendations is to provide measures which can be relatively quickly implemented to
prevent rain or surface water infiltration into the stockpile. The material has been
characterized as non -hazardous solids, however, the material does have an elevated pH.
It is Champion's desire to reduce the possibility of rainwater/surface water intusion into
the pile. Such water intrusion could cause water seepage at the stockpile toe which would
have an elevated pH.

Champion International Corporation
Law Engineering Job Number AVM-2717
September 26, 1990
Page 2
We are currently preparing a summary report which will address the long term
considerations of disposal of the material.
If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact us.
Very truly yours,
LAW ENGINEERING
l /
baniel B. Bunnell, P.E.
Senior Geotechnical Engineer
Managing Principal
Registered, North Carolina # 13814
/pb.a
LAW ENVIRONMENTAL
Thomas F. Beggs, P.E.
Principal Engineer
LAW ENGINEERING

Champion International Corporation
Law Engineering Job Number AVM-2717
September 26, 1990
Page 3
RECONM ENDATIONS FOR PREI.iMiNARY EARTHWORK ACTIVITIES
1. Flatten and track with dozer existing waste slopes to a 2.5H:1V (horizontal
to vertical slope).
2. Construct a rainfall run-on diversion ditch or berm (asphalt curbing or soil)
at the top of the waste pile along the landfill entrance road.
3. Construct a leachate collection toe drain as illustrated on Figure 1.
4. Construct a leachate collection basin as illustrated on Figure 2.
5. Place a 12" compacted soil layer on waste slope and top.
6. Grade top of waste pile to enhance runoff.
7. Grass slopes as soon as possible.
i
LAW ENGINEERING

smencsn bluspnnt
307263
0
D
s
z
cZ�
d
O
u0
D
r
m
to
O
D
N
< m
0
J C7
--i D
0z v
o z
a O
�o N
o c�
D m
om
z r
�1 D
z
(D m
m x
D
O I
z
H III
11=
III
rn II III
1> I =1
rn
C )
O -4-
f \ ;azz
rn _ � �vc�
'� \ mn ((A �m 0>
v o-4m Nv >M � \ N 0 cram
Q —m m \ I m=c
z z y \ c� cD-r • v
rn oGa
X 0 m m
z-4EE
m �'.�0m <O
cn
m co
m
cD^c Lyl r Nx \ /
cn `
z
G�
U) \
m \
ccnnmo
Dr.
omo
zv-1
NZv
vvo
c0nr
cnD
-U)O
MOO
mom
i O
u

amencan blueprint 307263
D
N
J
L
CO
N
-A
CD
O
0
c
m
i
U)
0
r
M
0
n
D C7
-a D
Z
0
Z Z
�u Z
2 0
N
C7
D
o M
Z �
Z
M
M
D
0
z
T
U)
2
m
o �
�
DO
O
C��
Z
M
OO
N
0—
z
MCC
MC-)
z
M
z
�-
M
v)
r-
0
u
M
.�J
C
M
m
0
Z
cc
M

WFINIM
co -4 (M CJt A W N3
'cr cn
3
M
D
cn
.4
3
�71
NO. OF CONTAINE
-7
UNPRESERVED
H,S 0,
HNO,
.VOA
A
'7d
-KI - A
ZFJ
A
A.
7,1
M
M
Im
3.
o
<
i m
z
co
to
oCD
(D
>
z
c
CD
co
CD
CD
V)
co
CD
'o
CD
z
0
a)
(D
cn
CR
0
O
0
Ql-
0
RE

Capital Proiects Office
23" z Church Street
P.O. Box 1489
Canton, North Carolina 28716
Telephone: [phone]
Pax: 704 646-2275
V Champion
,hampion International Corporation
October 8, 1990
o,,
C.
Cr
I >/
Mr. Bill Hocutt
Environmental Chemist II
North Carolina Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Solid Waste Management Division
Solid Waste Section
P.O- Box 27687
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687
Dear Mr. Hocutt:
Attached is the report from Law Engineering, which provides
recommendations for the short term protection of ground water
at the Canton Municipal Landfill, Permit Number 44-04, from
the No. 2 Fiber Line excavation materials. This report is in
response to the meeting held in Canton with the Solid Waste
Section on September 18, 1990.
In a telephone conversation Mr. Julian Foscue, Western Area
Supervisor, indicated Champion could proceed with the -plan as
outlined in the attached report. Champion began traking the
slopes on October 1, 1990. All work outlined in the attached
recommendations should be completed by early November. A
recommendation for the long term protection of ground water
from the excavation materials is being developed by Law
Engineering. Champion will provide these recommendations to
you in early November.
Also attached is the most recent pH analysis of the landfill
monitoring well #2 performed by Pace Inc. on October 3, 1990.
Test results indicate the monitoring well pH is 6.70 units.
This test indicates the ground water pH at well #2 is within
the 6.5-8.5.regulatory level established by the North
Carolina Department of Envirommnetal Management. The
landfill monitoring well pH results are significantly lower
than the first test results from July which indicated a pH of
9.73 units.

Mr. Bill Hocutt
October 8, 1990
Page 2
If you have any questions or need additional information
please contact me at [phone].
Sincerely,
Derric Brown
attachments (2)

Copy: Mr. Julian Foscue
Western Area Supervisor
NCDEHNR
Solid Waste Section
310 E. Third Street
Suite 200
Winston Salem, North Carolina 27106
Ms. Carolyn Merritt
Manager Solid Waste Programs
Champion International Corporation
One Champion Plaza
Stamford, Connecticut 06921
Mr. Jim Patterson
Waste Management Specialist
NCDEHNR
Solid Waste Section
Rt.l, Box 179
Hayesville, North Carolina 28904
Mr. Bill Stamey
Town Manager, Canton
P.O. Box 987
Canton, North Carolina 28716

-ACHMENT 1
LAW ENGINEERING
geotechnical, environmental & construction materials consultants
FOUR INTERCHANGE BOULEVARD
GREENVILLE, SOUTH CAROLINA 29607
[phone]
September 26, 1990
Champion International Corporation
Post Office Box C-10
Canton, North Carolina 28716
(Via Fax [phone])
Attention: Mr. Derrick Brown
Subject: Report of Recommendations for Preliminary Earthwork Activities
Soil Removed from No.-2 Fiberline Excavation Stockpiled at
Canton Municipal Landfill Canton, North Carolina
Law Engineering Job Number AVM-2717
Gentlemen:
As requested on September 19, 1990, we have prepared the attached recommendations
for providing temporary cover for the subject material. The purpose of our
recommendations is to provide measures which can be relatively quickly implemented to
prevent rain or surface water infiltration into the stockpile. The material has been
characterized as non -hazardous solids, however, the material does have an elevated pH.
It is Champion's desire to reduce the possibility of rainwater/surface water intusion into
the pile. Such water intrusion could cause water seepage at the stockpile toe which would
have an elevated pH.

Champion International Corporation
Law Engineering Job Number AVM-2717
September 26, 1990
Page 2
We are currently preparing a summary report which will address the long term
considerations of disposal of the material.
If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact us.
Very truly yours,
LAW ENGINEERING
Daniel B. Bunnell, P.E.
Senior Geotechnical Engineer
Managing Principal
Registered, North Carolina # 13814
/pb.a
LAW ENVIRONMENTAL
Thomas F. Beggs, P.E.
Principal Engineer
'jLli
LAW ENGINEERING

Champion International Corporation
Law Engineering Job Number AVM-2717
September 26, 1990
Page 3
RECONA ENDATIONS FOR PREI NUNARY EARTHWORK ACITVITIES
1. Flatten and track with dozer existing waste slopes to a 2.5H:1V (horizontal
to vertical slope).
2. Construct a rainfall run-on diversion ditch or berm (asphalt curbing or soil)
at the top of the waste pile along the landfill entrance road.
3. Construct a leachate collection toe drain as illustrated on Figure 1.
4. Construct a leachate collection basin as illustrated on Figure 2.
5. Place a 12" compacted soil layer on waste slope and top.
6. Grade top of waste pile to enhance runoff.
7. Grass slopes as soon as possible.
lAW ENGINEERING

amencan blueprint 307203
III
II—
II�I
C
o > 11=1
< m i� 1
0
� � 1 w� �rX
� t') o .o
Z a:O � � c7 --i>
> p r
Z -U F 'U mzz
G� rno AOG
co Z Z n
N m Z W m MOD -1 Q -� m -r cf)c N 0 0 CP
\ \\ I r m
"�( >m!- Ul O1U m
oO ��rn UUvO
m=r- cno-D
g O m o —> >o O�>
rOm �> m m z
r Z r Z— < rn
rn m D Z I N m� — <O c>nz
cm rn \ m o
m m K m III x / m Oq-
m cnmr
m x — —
0
_ / cn>
D 'o D Iil Z mOo
��
cn r- O mom
rn I=
z v 4 c r--. J O
Z n m '\ co
m
m \ /
cn �
z \ \
z
CA \ \
m \

american blueprint 307259
0
r
D -�
< m
N �
J O
S'
n
z 2
z
O
co z z
N X z
=o
CO N
O C7
O ao
r m
z
7 > -
- Z
m
c
m x
0
0
z
Fl-
N I
Q
"Co
F,
>O
Oo
Z
-UE:
N n
O—
F—F—
z
m�
rn(-)
r- 7
z
m
z
�-
m
I
m
0
O
z
m
<
m
O
z
cc
m

m
V
V
00 �! Q7 Ul � W N -+-
cn 0CD
I y
1 i
a
-4
�
C:
a z
-�
S
.,
'
` +1:
• i
V ,
3.
117
NO. OF CONTAINERf
UNPRESERVED
s
71
I
>
m
zCD
HNO.,
VOA
9
D
p
co
O
Zl
0
I0
I0
c
Io
C
d D
y
o
O
CD
O
CD,z
1
CJ Ci
�o
a
y
CD
O
Ipn
C
ilk
a
O
0
0
m
Ql-
O
L

'J'1 `0
�I
I
RETENTION POND
rMn1%