4403_ROSCANS_1993

Board of Commissioners:
Edwin Russell, Chairman
Ronald C. Leatherwood
Grover L. Bradshaw
William M. Edwards
John M. Queen, III
VIA FAX
August 30, 1993
Mr. James C. Coffey, Supervisor
Permitting Branch
Solid Waste Section
Division of Solid Waste Management
PO Box 27687
Raleigh, NC 27611-7687
Dear Mr. Coffey,
County Manager.
C. Jack Horton
Clerk to the Board:
Gwen S. Chambers
In reference to our telephone conversation of August 27th, Haywood
County requests an extension of permit expiration date for the
Haywood County Sanitary Landfill Permit #44-03 to October 8, 1993.
You, and much of the Solid Waste Section staff, are aware that the
construction contract for the new White Oak facility has been
extended until September loth, and the state inspection has been
scheduled for September 13th. Given this time frame it will be
necessary to remain at the current Francis Farm Road site until
the operational permit is granted for White Oak.
In no case will Haywood County be using the current site after
October 8, 1993. I appreciate your timely response to this
request as Haywood County has no desire to be in violation of
state solid waste management rules.
If I can answer any questions you may have, please contact me at
[phone] or Fax #[phone].
Sincerely,
C. Jack Horton
Haywood County Manager
cc: Julian Foscue
Jim Patterson
420 North Main Street • Courthouse Annex • Waynesville, North Carolina 28786
[phone]

NC DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT, HEALTH AND NATURAL RESOURCES
Division of Solid haste Management
Solid Waste Section
SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY EVALUATION REPORT
Type of Faci L i ty�/t� 0%141y Penmi t � County
&'.'/"'04.dA/'/_Locationame of Facility �a� t" o &/ LkX)ar
Date of Last Evaluation
r
I. Permit Conditions Followed Yes No N/A
A. Specific Condition(s) Violated
II. Operational Requirements Followed Yes
15A N.C. Admin. Code 138 Section 0 �
A. Specific Violation(s) by ember and letter.
� � �.� l,. �� �.�'i,� t �.�'.ii� (°,F.� �-�� t.'�!' C � :�� C� l r � l.�i�£� �- � !^ i.� v r� l h� C•�i t�'�Cj (.�,FFi-rrE„�
5° >�,
�l or ) s ) e�
(_- - U)) y'rj 6/ (fit')Dn Vii-2 Cl I' a. ...
III. Other Violations of Rule or
IV. Evaluator's Comments y6re '��f'G
(rP/" t/V2A4((Cj)'j(N1 4c".' &JN � �"ill�ft f\lr G A
11 fY
�1rtc..�. �yrtic,Y�v�.t�r'�' sll^l.� 1�5'}' lhSl(7�(�'tu>'• — �-' / / -,
V. Continuation Page Required? Yes ,eMo Receiving Signature
Evaluation Date j ';}'r Solid Waste Section2�,*°
DEHNR 3793 (Part I White: Facility Part II Canary: Central Office Part III Pink: Regional office)
Solid Waste Section (Review 7/94)

NC DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT, HEALTH AND NATURAL RESOURCES
Division of Solid waste Management
Solid Waste Section
SOLID WASTE NANAGENENT FACILITY EVALUATION REPORT
Type of Foci L j ty. Permit # County
am of Facility tf Location
ate of Last Evaluation
I. Permit Conditions Followed Yes No N/A
A- Specific Condition(s) Violated
II. Operational Requirements Followed Yes No
15A N.C_ Admin. Code 13B Section
A. Specific Viotation(s) by number and letter.
III- Other Violations of Rule or Law
i),rcA
rc)) ZL�A& �Ca-e- A 114
sh
V) /I tOLC4
IV. Evaluator's Commients
V. Continuation Page Required? -Yes No Receiving Signature
Evaluation Date Solid Waste Section
IHMR 3793 (Part I White: Facility Part II Canary. Central Office Part III Pink. Regional office)
wLid Waste Section (Review TPA)

FACILITY EVALUATION REPORT
CONTINUATION PAGE
Perini t
Evaluation Date
I. Permit Cordition(s) Violated:
A. Specific Condition(s) Vi
IT. Operatior%ai Requirements Followed
A. Specific Viotation(s) by number and letter.
Alv^4.
c
et le,iAc j pord,
I
,
Oil 't,kc , /� b;-1,4, /- �4,v C I
III. Other Violations of Rules or
IV. Evaluator's Comments JY
DEKHR 3793 (Part I White: Facility Part IT Canary-. Central Office Part III Pink: Regional office)
Solid Waste Section (Review 7/94)

FACILITY EVALUATION REPORT
CONTINUATION PAGE
Permit #
Evaluation Date
I. Permit Ccrdition(s) Violated:
A. Specific Condition(s) Vic
II. Operational Requirements Followed
A. Specific Viotation(s) by nuffber and letter.
Mh-X,--r� 114U 1,9 101A 4zc A., i I
III. Other Violations of Rules or
IV. Evaluatorls Comments rsFn f raYt
_j
DEHMR 3793 (Part I White: Facility Part II Canary: Central office Part III Pink: Regional Office)
Solid Waste Section (Review 7/94)

NC DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT, HEALTH AND NATURAL RESOURCES
Division of Solid Waste Management
Solid Waste Section
SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY EVALUATION REPORT
Type of Faci Lity: Yk, �,,-�: : , e�( i� i Permit 03 county p? r 1 a10La
4.41
Name of Facility 1i ��4�9) Location
Date of Last Evaluation[ 3 i
I. Permit Conditions Followed Yes No N/A
A. Specific Cordition(s) Violated
II. Operational Requirements Followed Yes _ �No
15A N.C. Ad•in. Code 13B Section
A. Specific Violations) by number and letter.
III. Other Violations of Rule or Law
IV. Evaluator's Comments /Y%. A C�► �''Y�G'. kid ':: �� � l.t_C�� %liYa4'rr� � h'O14
i
V. Continuation Page Required? Yes -�;No Receiving Signature i.
Evaluation Date 1 _ Solid Waste Section
DENNR 3793 (Part I White: Facility Part II Canary: Central Office Part III Pink: Regional Office)
Solid Waste Section (Review 7/94)

Board of Commissioners:
Edwin Russell, Chairman
Ronald C. Leatherwood
Grover L. Bradshaw
William M. Edwards
John M. Queen, III
VIA FAX
August 30, 1993
Mr. James C. Coffey, Supervisor
Permitting Branch
Solid Waste Section
Division of Solid Waste Management
PO Box 27687
Raleigh, NC 27611-7687
Dear Mr. Coffey,
County Manager:
C. Jack Horton
Clerk to the Board:
Gwen S. Chambers
In reference to our telephone conversation of August 27th, Haywood
County requests an extension of permit expiration date for the
Haywood County Sanitary Landfill Permit #44-03 to October 8, 1993.
You, and much of the Solid Waste Section staff, are aware that the
construction contract for the new White Oak facility has been
extended until September 10th, and the state inspection has been
scheduled for September 13th. Given this time frame it will be
necessary to remain at the current Francis Farm Road site until
the operational permit is granted for White Oak.
In no case will Haywood County be using the current site after
October 8, 1993. I appreciate your timely response to this
request as Haywood County has no desire to be in violation of
state solid waste management rules.
If I can answer any questions you may have, please contact me at
[phone] or Fax #[phone].
Sincerely,
C`: Jack Horton
Haywood County Manager
cc: `Julian Foscue
Jim Patterson
420 North Main Street • Courthouse Annex • Waynesville, North Carolina 28786
[phone]

atl. aNi•
STAB o
Y .aNM VOaV ,✓
Vaaana.f
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
512 North Salisbury Street • Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Division of Solid Waste Management
Governor Divis
James B. Hunt, Jr., Telephone [phone] Jonathan R Howes, Secretary
July 27, 1993
Mr. C. Jack Horton
County Manager, Haywood County
Courthouse Annex
Waynesville, N.C. 28786
Re: Implementation Of Subtitle 'D' Ground -water Monitoring Program
Dear Mr. Horton,
The purpose of this correspondence is to provide information and
clarification on the changes in ground -water monitoring requirements
for MSWLF facilities that remain in operation after October 9, 1993.
The recently adopted North Carolina Solid Waste Management Rules
reflect significant changes for ground -water monitoring based on
requirements of the E.P.A. Subtitle D Rules.
Attachment A to this letter provides a summary of important
dates and significant activities that must be accomplished in order
to be in compliance with the new rules. Attachment B contrasts
existing and new ground -water monitoring and assessment requirements
based on changes in the rules. Because of significant increases in
costs that will be incurred in order to operate a MSWLF under the new
Subtitle D Rules, including financial assurance and increased costs
for ground -water monitoring and assessment, you may wish to seriously
consider closing your sanitary landfill prior to October 9, 1993,
when the new rules become effective.
Based on past ground -water monitoring data for the Haywood
County landfill, there are already documented violations of North
Carolina Groundwater Quality Standards at some of the detection
monitoring wells. A copy of recent sampling analytical data is
attached on which highlighting has been done for the Appendix I
constituents that exceed the Groundwater Quality Standards.
Therefore, when the new rules take effect, Haywood County may quickly
be required to implement assessment monitoring for all Appendix II
constituents. Since the Groundwater Quality Standards are also used
in establishing the ground -water protection standards, you may also
rapidly move into assessment of corrective action alternatives based
P.O. Box 27687, Ibleigh, Nonh Carolina 276I1-7687 Telephone [phone] Fax a 9197310513
An Fqual npixirwnity Affirmative Action Fniployer

Page 2
on a full-scale ground -water investigation to determine the nature
and extent of contamination at the site.
If Haywood County chooses to continue to operate their MSWLF
facility after October 9, 1993, then you need to begin planning and
budgeting immediately for the activities outlined in Attachment A. A
revised Water Quality Monitoring Plan must be submitted as part of
the Transition Plan on or before April 9, 1994. All background
sampling and related activities for the upgraded monitoring system
must be completed and reported to the Division in order to
demonstrate compliance with the new water quality monitoring
requirements on or before October 9, 1994.
Please note that the goals and objectives for ground -water
assessment monitoring and ground -water contamination investigations
are the same under both the current and the proposed rules and shall
be accomplished in a way that is protective of human health and the
environment. However, current rules allow for greater flexibility in
the assessment and investigation activities and the sample analytical
costs could be substantially less using the constituent list required
under current rules and policy as compared to analytical costs
required by the new rules based on Subtitle D, which require sampling
for the Appendix II list of constituents.
I hope this letter has been helpful in providing you more
insight into the actions that will be required by Haywood County to
maintain compliance with the water quality monitoring requirements of
the Solid Waste Management Rules as we make the transition to the new
rules growing out of the E.P.A. Subtitle D Regulations. If you have
any questions or comments regarding this letter, please contact the
Solid Waste Section at [phone].
Sincerely,
&117 41�/
Bobby Lutfy, Hydrogeologist
Solid Waste Section
cc: James Patterson
(44-03)
Attachments