4408TP_ROSCANS_2011

Compliance Inspection Report
Permit: NCG130039 Effective: 06/01/08 Expiration: 05/31/13 Owner: Haywood Co
SOC: Effective: Expiration: Facility: Haywood County Solid Waste
County: Haywood 278 Recycle Rd
Region: Asheville
Clyde NC 28721
Contact Person: Stephen King Title: Phone: [phone]
Directions to Facility:
System Classifications:
Primary ORC: Certification: Phone:
Secondary ORC(s):
On -Site Representative(s):
Related Permits:
Inspection Date: 03/08/2011 Entry Time: 09:40 AM Exit Time: 01:10 PM
Primary Inspector: Susan A Wilson Phone: [phone]
Secondary Inspector(s):
Reason for Inspection: Routine Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Permit Inspection Type: Wholesale Trade of Non-metal Waste and Scrap
Stormwater Discharge COC
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ■ Not Compliant
Question Areas:
Storm Water
(See attachment summary)
Page: 1

Permit: NCG130039 Owner -Facility: Haywood Co
Inspection Date: 03/08/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
Susan Wilson (DWQ) and Andrea Keller (DWM) met with Stephen King and Marc Pruitt of Haywood County at the Solid
Waste Facility (Recycling and Transfer Station).
Mr. King gave a site tour of the area. Although one stormwater outfall had been identified (the outlet from the basin),
DWQ identified another stormwater outfall near the entrance of the facility (stormwater flows through the drop inlets
on -site to an outlet at Jones Cove Branch, near the entrance to the Transfer Station).
The County is in the process of developing a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan. Qualitative monitoring was started
9/2010.
Haywood County should have the Stormwater Pollution Prevention plan completed and in place by April 30, 2011 [the
permit has been in effect for several years and the Plan should have already been completed].
Semi-annual qualitative monitoring should be conducted at both identified stormwater outfalls.
Page: 2

Permit: NCG130039 Owner - Facility: Haywood Co
Inspection Date: 03/08/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan
Does the site have a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan?
# Does the Plan include a General Location (USGS) map?
# Does the Plan include a "Narrative Description of Practices"?
# Does the Plan include a detailed site map including outfall locations and drainage areas?
# Does the Plan include a list of significant spills occurring during the past 3 years?
# Has the facility evaluated feasible alternatives to current practices?
# Does the facility provide all necessary secondary containment?
# Does the Plan include a BMP summary?
# Does the Plan include a Spill Prevention and Response Plan (SPRP)?
# Does the Plan include a Preventative Maintenance and Good Housekeeping Plan?
# Does the facility provide and document Employee Training?
# Does the Plan include a list of Responsible Party(s)?
# Is the Plan reviewed and updated annually?
# Does the Plan include a Stormwater Facility Inspection Program?
Has the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan been implemented?
Reason for Visit: Routine
Comment: The County is in the process of putting a Stormwater Pollution Prevention
Plan together. The plan should include an up to date site map, with the stormwater
outfall at the entrance and the stormwater outfall from the basin at the back of the
property included (for two designated stormwater outfalls which will need to be
monitored). This was discussed with Stephen King on site.
Qualitative Monitoring
Has the facility conducted its Qualitative Monitoring semi-annually?
Comment: The facility has recently begun monitoring (as of 9/2010). Qualitative
monitoring should be conducted at both stormwater outfalls, semi-annually.
Analytical Monitoring
Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring?
# Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring from Vehicle Maintenance areas?
Comment: For this permit - no analytical monitoring is required at the outfalls. A small
amount of vehicle maintenance is conducted under a covered area. At this time - no
analytical monitoring for vehicle maintenance is required.
Permit and Outfalls
# Is a copy of the Permit and the Certificate of Coverage available at the site?
❑❑■❑
❑ ❑ ■ ❑
■000
Page: 3

Permit: NCG130039 Owner - Facility: Haywood Co
Inspection Date: 03/08/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
# Were all outfalls observed during the inspection? ®❑ ❑ 0
# If the facility has representative outfall status, is it properly documented by the Division? ❑ ❑
# Has the facility evaluated all illicit (non stormwater) discharges? _ ®❑ ❑ ❑
Comment: The County is beginning to get all the required information together. A
copy of the NCG13 permit was on -site, along with some monitoring as of 9/2010.
Page: 4

4 * o
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natura
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Coleen H. Sullins
Governor Director
April 5, 2011
Mr. Stephen King, Director
Haywood County - Recycling and Solid Waste Management
278 Recycle Road
Clyde, NC 28721
iEE C,;
Resources
SUBJECT: Notice of Violation (NOV-2011-PC-0243)
Haywood County — Solid Waste — Materials Recovery and Transfer Station
NPDES General Stormwater Permit—NCG130039
Haywood County
Response Deadline: April 29, 2011
Dear Mr. King:
Dee Freeman
Secretary
This letter is in follow-up to the NPDES Stormwater Permit Compliance Inspection conducted on
March 8, 2011, Susan Wilson, Division of Watery Quality (DWQ) and Andrea Keller, Division of
Waste Management (DWM) met with you at the Materials Recovery and Transfer station off
Recycle Road in Haywood County. The facility was found to be in violation of permit
NCG130039.
The following permit condition violations were noted during the Division of Water Quality
inspection:
1. Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SPPP)
➢ A Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SPPP) has not been developed and properly
implemented. The plan should be completed and in place by April 30, 2011.
2. Qualitative Monitoring
➢ Qualitative monitoring has not been conducted and recorded in accordance with permit
requirements.
Enclosed is a copy of the Compliance Inspection Report, which contains additional observations
and comments for your reference. A topographic map of the stormwater outfalls is also enclosed
for your records.
Location: 2090 U.S. Highway 70, Swannanoa, North Carolina 28778 One
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone] Customer Service: 1-877-623-6748 NOI'e�1CaY 011lla
Internet: www.ncwaterquality.org Naturally
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer �//�YJ

wir. &mg
April 5, 2011
Page 2 of 2
a
Please explain why these problems occurred and when Haywood County anticipates being in full
compliance with the stormwater permit.
The Division understands that Haywood County is now making progress towards compliance.
During the day of inspection, the site appeared very well maintained operated, with no apparent
surface water impacts occurring from the operation.
Please contact Susan A. Wilson at [phone] or [e-mail] , should you
need further assistance.
Sincerely,
Roger C. Edwards, Regional Supervisor
Surface Water Protection
Asheville Regional Office
Enclosure: Inspection Report
Topo map
cc: ARO File Copy (w/enclosures)
Andrea Keller, DWM (w/enclosures)
S:\SWP\Haywood\Stormwater\NCG13 Non-metal Waste and Scrap\Haywood Co Recycle NCG130039\CEI.NOV-2011-PC-0243.Recycle.4
2011.doe

00" W 082 ° 57' 30.00" W 082- 57' 00.00" W 082 ° 56' 30.00" W 082 ° 56' 00.00" W I I 1 082 ° 5:
Z
1 �s �/ 1 2^ `
V R
Z
00
CO
_
r
•'
00
\` 4
!ice
•yam t,'� M
c �
o
m4,
O
.
o
CO
/
m
1 •�.
PY Y I r`
r rim fr a� f
r� /, i .
h�� / .: O.N
CO
Haywood Co
Recycle SD01
Z�
�\ \ .. \ -
(at basin)
i� f�k 4
Z
m
;' t } r•
- ' ` ,„
/
Haywood
,n
co
o
s / •y
��°
Co recycle
SD02 nr
.1_ /
o
entrance
.
1
f•
o
z545-
f
0
CO
CO
CO
CO
ly
LO
CO
9!
00" W 082 ° 57' 30.00" W 082 ° 57' 00.00" W 082 ° 56' 30.00" W 082 ° 56' 00.00" W 082 ° 5
SCALE 1:24000
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 700
FEET

00" W 082 ° 57' 30.00" W 082- 57' 00.00" W 082 ° 56' 30.00" W 082- 56' 00.00" W 082- 5:
NOz
CO
CO
G �1
LD
z
O
!
z
_
co
C'S
C\I_
co
t nf,, la
r r
ICQ
1p
11 \ b
I \
o n �_�
Haywood Co
Z
,•
I } L
-
Recycle SD01.s
basin)
yr_
' ;
�j ;'
(at ��
/�
z
O
_
r • a nil te,
L
O
CO
'o
CO
�' ` 1
'.
\ yFJ
1 �t
') r
y
a
W
Haywood
i)
.,, j'(�
%
�•• P ( /
Co recycle 1
SD02
j
o
.� I `
� �-ri, rrc . �,•'
.�=-1—_
entrance
Z
A 144(l.t'
4
r t
Z
p
256b-
7�
;
M
tJ 7-
i i t
•
t
I 1
O
_ v°
(7
co
11 F�.
1�. tom►
n f(����
°;°t
g
a�i
��
J
•
-
d r
{►_
i
�/ '�
��7 IIjj if S /
3 •
_
C,
CO
'•;:
00" W 082- 57' 30.00" W 082 ° 57' 00.00" W 082 ° 56' 30.00" W I I 1 0'82 ° 56' 00.00" W 082-5
SCALE 1:24000
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 700
FEET

Fac/Perrn/Co ID #
Li Ll -v
Date
Doc ID#
SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY
FIRE OCCURRENCE NOTIFICATION 1131
AIF
NC DENR Division of Waste Management Solid Waste Section NCDENR
Notify the Section verbally within 24 hours and submit written notification within 15 days of the occurrence.
(If additional space is needed, use back of this form.)
NAME OF FACILITY: Haywood County Solid Waste Management PERMIT # 44-08 T&P
DATE AND TIME OF FIRE: 10/16/2011
HOW WAS THE FIRE REPORTED AND BY WHOM:
I l call. Facility was closed and no employees were on site
I,IST ACTIONS TAKEN:
@ approximately 4:30pm
?ire department, rescue squad, emergency management, and fire marshal were dispatched to scene. County drivers were brought in to run equipment and aid
:firefighters in gaining access to area. Other county employees were on site to assist where needed. Employees were on site overnight for fire watch duties. The
acility was up and operating on regular schedule the next day and cleanup was completed Monday evening.
WHAT WAS THE CAUSE OF THE FIRE:
electrical
DESCRIBE AREA, TYPE, AND AMOUNT OF WASTE INVOLVED:
Sack wall of the recycle building including the pick line. Approximately 45.7 tons of blue bag materials were destroyed.
WHAT COULD HAVE BEEN DONE TO PREVENT THIS FIRE:
tun wiring higher in the area where blue bags are collected
DESCRIBE PLAN OF ACTIONS TO PREVENT FUTURE INCIDENTS:
Run wiring higher in the area where blue bags are collected
INAME:Stephen King TITLE: Director DATE: 10/31/2011 I
THIS SECTION TO BE COMPLETED BY _OLI WASTE SECTION REGIONAL STAFF
DATE RECEIVED / I D /
List any factors not listed that might have contribu d to a fire or that might prevent occurrence of future fires:
FOLLOW-UP REQUIRED:
NO PHONE CALL SUBMITTAL MEETING ❑ RETURN VISIT BY: (DATE).
ACTIONS TAKEN OR REQUIRED:
Ve4l
Revised 618109

Compliance Inspection Report
Permit: NCG130039 Effective: 06/01/08 Expiration: 05/31/13 Owner: Haywood Co
SOC: Effective: Expiration: Facility: Haywood County Solid Waste
County: Haywood 278 Recycle Rd
Region: Asheville
Clyde NC 28721
Contact Person: Stephen King Title: Phone: [phone]
Directions to Facility:
System Classifications:
Primary ORC: Certification: Phone:
Secondary ORC(s):
On -Site Representative(s):
Related Permits:
Inspection Date: 03/08/2011 Entry Time: 09:40 AM Exit Time: 01:10 PM
Primary Inspector: Susan A Wilson Phone: [phone]
Secondary Inspector(s):
Reason for Inspection: Routine Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Permit Inspection Type: Wholesale Trade of Non-metal Waste and Scrap
Stormwater Discharge COC
Facility Status: 0 Compliant ■ Not Compliant
Question Areas:
Storm Water
(See attachment summary)
Page: 1

Permit: NCG130039 Owner - Facility: Haywood Co
Inspection Date: 03/08/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
Susan Wilson (DWQ) and Andrea Keller (DWM) met with Stephen King and Marc Pruitt of Haywood County at the Solid
Waste Facility (Recycling and Transfer Station).
Mr. King gave a site tour of the area. Although one stormwater outfall had been identified (the outlet from the basin),
DWQ identified another stormwater outfall near the entrance of the facility (stormwater flows through the drop inlets
on -site to an outlet at Jones Cove Branch, near the entrance to the Transfer Station).
The County is in the process of developing a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan. Qualitative monitoring was started
9/2010.
Haywood County should have the Stormwater Pollution Prevention plan completed and in place by April 30, 2011 [the
permit has been in effect for several years and the Plan should have already been completed].
Semi-annual qualitative monitoring should be conducted at both identified stormwater outfalls.
Page: 2

Permit: NCG130039 Owner - Facility: Haywood Co
Inspection Date: 03/08/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
Atnrmwntar Pnilsitinn Pravantinn Plan Yes No NA NE
Does the site have a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan?
# Does the Plan include a General Location (USGS) map?
# Does the Plan include a "Narrative Description of Practices"?
# Does the Plan include a detailed site map including outfall locations and drainage areas?
# Does the Plan include a list of significant spills occurring during the past 3 years?
# Has the facility evaluated feasible alternatives to current practices?
# Does the facility provide all necessary secondary containment?
# Does the Plan include a BMP summary?
# Does the Plan include a Spill Prevention and Response Plan (SPRP)?
# Does the Plan include a Preventative Maintenance and Good Housekeeping Plan?
# Does the facility provide and document Employee Training?
# Does the Plan include a list of Responsible Party(s)?
# Is the Plan reviewed and updated annually?
# Does the Plan include a Stormwater Facility Inspection Program?
Has the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan been implemented?
Comment: The County is in the process of putting a Stormwater Pollution Prevention
Plan together. The plan should include an up to date site map, with the stormwater
outfall at the entrance and the stormwater outfall from the basin at the back of the
property included (for two designated stormwater outfalls which will need to be
monitored). This was discussed with Stephen King on site.
Qualitative Monitor!
Has the facility conducted its Qualitative Monitoring semi-annually?
Comment: The facility has recently begun monitoring (as of 9/2010). Qualitative
monitoring should be conducted at both stormwater outfalls, semi-annually.
Analytical Monitoring Yes No NA NE
Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring? ❑ ❑ ■ ❑
# Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring from Vehicle Maintenance areas? ❑ Cl ■ ❑
Comment: For this permit - no analytical monitoring is required at the outfalls. A small
amount of vehicle maintenance is conducted under a covered area. At this time - no
analytical monitoring for vehicle maintenance is required.
Permit and Outfalls Yes No NA NE
# Is a copy of the Permit and the Certificate of Coverage available at the site? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Page: 3

Permit: NCG130039 Owner - Facility: Haywood Co
Inspection Date: 03/08/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
# Were all outfalls observed during the inspection? ®❑ 11 n
# If the facility has representative outfall status, is it properly documented by the Division? ❑ Q ■ Q
# Has the facility evaluated all illicit (non stormwater) discharges?
Comment: The County is beginning to get all the required information together. A
copy of the NCG13 permit was on4te, along with some monitoring as of 9/2010.
Page: 4