0603_ROSCANS_2009

�a
NC®ENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Dexter R. Matthews, Director Division of Waste Management Beverly Eaves Perdue, Governor
Dee Freeman, Secretary
SOLID WASTE SECTION
February 6, 2009
Robert Wiseman,
Avery County Manager
P.O. Box 640
Newland, NC 28657
Stacey A. Smith, P.E., Project Manager
Richardson Smith Garner & Associates
14 North Boylan Ave.
Raleigh, NC 27603
Subject: Application Review
Technical Review
"Waste Relocation and Mitigation Plan — October 2008"
Avery County C&D Landfill
Permit No. 06-03
Avery County
Gentlemen:
On June 26, 2008 the Division of Waste Management received your "Transition Application" entitled
Waste Relocation and Mitigation Plan: Avery County C&D Landfill; Ingalls, North Carolina; NC Solid
Waste Permit No. 06-03. Prepared for the County of Avery. October 2008.
The Division has completed the technical review of the submittal for compliance with North Carolina
Administrative Code 15A NCAC 13B. The technical review of your application has revealed several
questions. Below is a list of revisions and requests for additional information which have been broken
down by plan contents:
5.0 Compliance Plan
The plan includes a request for a "lateral expansion" of the permitted waste disposal area. Such an
expansion is considered an amendment to the existing permit that must be completed in accordance
with 15A NCAC 13B .0535(b).
Please provide a map showing the original permitted waste boundary of the C&D landfill and the
waste boundary of the proposed final, reclaimed waste limits.
2090 US Highway 70, Swannanoa, North Carolina 28778
Phone [phone] \ FAX [phone] \ Internet http://wastenotnc.org
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer— Printed on Dual Purpose Recycled Paper

A survey (characterization study) should be taken of all properties that would fall within any aerial
limits of any expanded (new) buffer requirements caused by the proposed lateral expansion. This
survey should be done in accordance with 15A NCAC 13B .0536(c)(1).
(NOTE: The location of the water supply well, as well as any residential structures on the James Frye
property, relative to the permitted waste boundary and to the existing waste boundary, is a concern.
As the water supply well on the James Fry property was constructed after the C&D landfill was
operational, it must meet the requirements of 15A NCAC 2C: "Well Construction Standards". The
Aquifer Protection Section of the Division of Water Quality is currently evaluating the regulatory
status of this well.)
5.1 Property Purchase
Any proposed property purchases may not be needed, pending the Aquifer Protection Section's
evaluation of the regulatory status of James Frye water supply well, and a new survey of the
surrounding properties.
5.2 Potable Well
As the regulatory status of the James Frye water supply well is being evaluated, any future monitoring
of this well may not be needed.
5.3 Vertical Expansion
Any vertical expansion must receive prior approval from the Permitting Branch.
5.4 Waste Relocation
Any waste relocation that results in an expansion beyond the original, permitted waste limits must
receive prior approval from the Permitting Branch.
7.2 General Procedures
A revised Sediment and Erosion Control Plan will be required.
7.3 Periodic Cover
An alternative cover material is not currently approved for this facility. Earthen cover is required as
per 15A NCAC 13B .0542(f)(1).
7.5 Height Monitorine
The proposed monthly height monitoring should be adjusted to more frequent intervals, such as
weekly.
16.0 Compliance Schedule
Considering the potential impact to surrounding properties, water supply wells and surface waters, the
proposed two year compliance schedule is unacceptable. A revised compliance schedule should be
submitted and includes benchmarks for evaluating the progress and effectiveness of the approved
corrective actions. The benchmarks can be either performance based or time based. Corrective
actions must be completed within a 120 days of approval of the revised plan.

Please provide the requested information, to me, in the form of a revised plan. All information should be
submitted in the form of one written copy and one electronic copy (pdf format). Should you have any
questions regarding this letter you may contact me at [phone].
Sincerely,
4 xzt --
Bill Wagner
Environmental Senior Specialist
c: Mark Poindexter, Field Operations Branch Head — DWM/SWS
Jaclynne Drummond, Hydrogeologist — DWM/SWS
Henry Norris — Avery County, P.O. Box 305, Newland, NC 28657
Deb Aja, Western District Supervisor — ARO/SWS
Alan Gaither, Permitting Engineer — ARO/SWS

r
R1CxaRDSOar S� GARDNER
ENGINEERING & GEOLOGICAL
51iRVIChi
February 26,2009
Mr. Zinith Barbee
NCDENR — Division of Waste Management
Solid Waste Section
1646 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1646
RE: Additional Site Study
Avery County Landfill
Newland, North Carolina
Dear Mr. Barbee:
Thank you for taking the time to meet with me last week regarding additional site study work
needed to obtain a letter of Site Suitability for the northern and western portions of the Avery
County Landfill property. This letter, submitted on behalf of Avery County, outlines our
proposed work plan to respond to comments received November 18, 2008 (copy attached)
which required additional site study as we discussed.
Scope of Work
Richardson Smith Gardner and Associates, Inc. (RSG) will install three additional piezometers
(labeled PZ-14, PZ-15 and PZ-16) as shown on the attached Figure 1. One (1) of these
piezometers, PZ-15, will be installed to the depth of bedrock (approximately 90 feet below
grade). The remaining two (2) piezometers, PZ-14 and PZ-16, will be installed to a depth
approximately 10 feet below the water table surface.
All three borings will be drilled by hollow stem auger with standard penetration test samples
being collected every five feet of auger advancement. Two undisturbed Shelby tube samples
will also be collected from piezometer PZ-15. Each boring will be completed as a piezometer
with 10 feet of 10-slot screen and solid PVC riser pipe to approximately 3 feet above grade.
Lockable steel outer casings will be installed on each piezometer to maintain long term viability
of the piezometer. A well tag will be completed for each piezometer and affixed to the outside
of the outer steel casing.
Soil samples from each boring will be analyzed for geotechnical properties including sieve
analysis, atterberg limits, natural moisture, density and the undisturbed sample will be analyzed
for hydraulic conductivity and strength testing.
Upon completion of the field work and receipt of geotechnical laboratory analysis, RSG will
submit a supplemental report to the Site Study report submitted in April 2008. This report will
outline the results of this additional work and will contain revisions to pertinent drawings in the
Site Study to add the new piezometer locations and information.
14 N. BOYLAN AVENUE • RALEIGH, NC 27603 • TEL: [phone] • FAX [phone] • WWW.RSGENGINEERS.COM

Mr. Barbee
February 26, 2009
Page 2 of 2
Schedule
RSG will contact you prior to implementing this work. At this time, we plan to perform this
work in Avery County's fiscal year 2009-2010. We estimate this work will take approximately
six (6) weeks to complete.
Avery County would like approval of this plan prior to budgeting and engaging in this work. We
appreciate your quick response in this matter. If you have any questions, or require additional
information please call or e-mail me at your earliest convenience.
Sincerely,
Richardson Smith Gardner and Associates, Inc.
Joan A. Smyth, P.G.
Senior Hydrogeologist
joan @DrsRengineers.com
Attachments
cc: Buddy Norris, Avery County
Bill Wagner, NCDENR
Allan Gaither, NCDENR
File

�imor
RCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Waste Management
Beverly Eaves Perdue Dexter R. Matthews
Governor Director
February 27, 2009
Ms. Joan Smyth, P.G.
Richardson Smith Gardner & Associates
14 N. Boylan Avenue
Raleigh, North Carolina 27603
Dee Freeman
Secretary
Subject: Additional Site Study Work Plan, Avery County C&D Landfill Expansion, Permit 06-
03, Doc ID 6809
Dear Ms. Smyth:
The Solid Waste Section (SWS) approves the Additional Site Study Work Plan (plan)
presented in the letter, dated February 26, 2009. The SWS met you at its central office on
February 12, 2009, to discuss the plan for the site suitability study applicable to construction of
landfill phases subsequent to Phase 3. Those phases are depicted in Drawing P1, Sheet 6 and
Drawing P2, Sheet 7 in Appendix H of the Revised Site Study. Avery County Landf lll, Ingalls,
North Carolina (Doc ID 4444).
The area of study approximates 30 acres. The plan meets the requirement of Regulation
.0538(a)(3) in which a minimum "one boring per each 10 acres" is specified. Three borings are
proposed: PZ-14, PZ-15 and PZ-16. They are depicted in Figure 1 attached to the
aforementioned letter. The borings can be utilized in Design Hydrogeologic Studies for later
landfill construction. In these studies, boring densities are "one boring for each acre of the
investigative area", pursuant to Regulation 15A NCAC 13B .0538(b)(1). Pursuant to Regulation
15A NCAC 13B .0538(a)(4)(E), include the porosity, effective porosity, and dispersive
characteristic for each lithologic unit in the upper aquifer when conducting geotechnical analysis.
Please contact me if you have any questions. I can be reached at 919-508-8401 or at
An ith.barbee(ancmai].net.
Sincerely,
Zinith Barbee
Hydrogeologist
Solid Waste Section
cc: Buddy Norris Avery County Solid Waste - Director
Allen Gaither SWS/ARO
Bill Wagner SWS/ARO
Ed Mussler SWS Permitting Branch
Central File
1646 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1646
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone] Internet: www.wastenotne.org/swhome
NonrthCarolina
An Equal Opportunity 1AKrmalive Action Employer

Mar.23. 2009 10:17AM
No. 091 P. 1
County of Avery
Solid Waste Management Office
Post Office Box 640 Newland, NC 28657
Phone: [phone] Fox: (828) 73-8209
Henry C. Norris Jr, Director Bob Crenshaw, Asst. Director
W-xvia'amm-1
DATE: MarX2009 NO: PAGES IN FAX:
TO: Bill Wagner FAX: [phone]
FROM: Buddy Norris FAX: [phone]
MESSAGE
Bill, Here are the documents you requested.
Buddy Norris
AVERY COUNTY GOVERNMENT
Highest County Seat East of the Rockies
RECEIVED
SOLID WASTE SECTION
ASHEVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE

Mar.23. 2009 10:18AM No.7391 P. 2
U y cQu AVERY COUNTY INSPECTION DEPARTMENT
AVERY COUNTY COURTHOUSE
P 0 BOX 596
NEWLAND, NC 28657
[phone]
EUILAING PERMIT 06771
*www*xwwwwwwwxwwwwww*wwwww*wwwwwwwwwxwwwwwwww*wwwwwwwwwxxxxwwwwxwwwwww****
Date Issued 10/12/2004 Date of CO
Owner's Name FRYE, Jim 766-8397 Township WILSONS CREEK
ALTAMONT ACRES LOT 14 In Flood Plain N
3222 LAND HARBOR Site Elevation 0
NEWLAND, NC 28657 100 yr FP E1ev 0
Watershed Protection Approval Date / /
Location ALTAMONT ACRES, LOT 14, LOWER SITE BESIDE STREAM
PIN 18210016599000000 FRYE, JAMES C. &
***xwxwww*wwww*ww*xwwxwx**wwwwwx*t,r#ww**w*xwwwwwwxxx,rxxxxwxwwxw*xxxxxxxwww*x
CONTRACTOR INFORMATION
CUSTOM CRAFT CIARPENTARY, INC GENERAL CONTRACTORS 89907 LIM RES
B ELECT. INT. ELECTRICAL CONTRACTORS._�vn14" &Sgij3
MILLER'S PLUMBING SYSTEMS INC. PLOMBING CONTRACTORS 18185 PLM.CL.I
A 1 = ATf , = .. •.=�S •9 9, H2&3 CLS
" " Health Dept A , ry p Approval Y Layout Date 3/29/�0041 (
SS Inits AH Sewer System Final
Plans on File Y Architect
www*wxxww*w*wwwww*xwwwWw*wwww****www*wwwwww***xwxwwwww*w*twwwwww***xxwwww***
TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION
Occ Cl RES Bldg Type 101
Type of Heat MONITOR A/C
Description SF'D WITH ONE LEVEL
Size of Electric Service 200 AMP
Type vI
SINGLE-FAMILY HOUSES, DETATCHED
N Permit 'Type
Finished Unfinished Deck TO
Square Footage of Construction 0 0 l70
Estimate Square Footage of Excavation 100
FEES TO DATE 130
CREDITS TO DATE 130
www**wwww*wxwwwwxwwwww*wwwwxwwwwwwww wwwCURRENT
BALANCE xwwwwwwwwxwwwx*ww*0.
Estimate of Total Construction Cost
The undersigned agrees to conform to all
applicable laws of the County of Avery &
the State of North Carolina, and further
states that all statements made herein
are true.
Owner or`Contractor Avery
95,000
DATEaY
and Watershed Administra
intF'Inspection Department
RECEIVED
MAR 2 3 2009
SOLID VVASTE SECTION
ASHEVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
ww
www
00
00
00w

Mar. 23.
a
2009 10:18AM
No.7391 P. 3
C E R T I F I C A T E O F b C C U P A N C Y
AVERY COUN"1"3t INSPECTION DEPARTMENT
AVERY COUNTY COURTHOUSE
P 0 BOX 596
WEIRAPD, NC 28657
(828)733-$204
BUILDING PERMIT 06771
xxxxx�r:r*x,rxxt*x,r**x,r,rxxax,rxt,r,rxx�e;r�r'x+,r��x�+x+rtx�rx�w�xxxxxxxxx,rx�xxxxx,e**,tx*a
Date Issued 10/12/2004 Date of CO 6/08/2006
Owner's Name FRYE, JIM 766-8397 Township WILSONS CREEK
ALTAMONT ACRES LOT 14
3222 LAND HARBOR
NEWLAND, NC 28657
PIN 18210016599000000
FRYE, JAMBS C. &
Location ALTAMONT ACRES, LOT 14, LOWER SITE BESIDE STREAM 1009 HOBBS KNOB
RICHARD BROWN PULLED OPP AS ELECTRICIAN ON 4/25/05
THIS PERMIT WILL, COVER ONLY THE AREAS THAT CAN BB MADE AVAILABLE POR
**+rxwxxttx�*ttx�+�+xf,xrw�rirwxw�w�xxxxx*wxx;Y**ik�*+kxxxx**;u*vrx�t*A��xw*+r*�+x,r*x,r,e ,rrx
General CUSTOM CRAFT CARPENTARY, INC License 89907 LIM RES
Contractor PIO' SOK 1022 Ins Co
BOONS, NC 28604
tx,r��x�xr+*�*xxx�xxxtxxxxxx*�,t,r,rx�*xv,r*+�+r,�+txxxt*xtxxxxrt+t,rrrtt,r**,e,�t,�+*,r x*,r
REMARKS -
SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING
In the opinion of this department, the
PremiSes represented above comply with
the applicable Building Regulations DATE
based on the North Carolina Building
Code. it
---------------------------------------
Ordinance & Watershed Administrator
Mechem cal InsPectar
- - - - - - - - - - - - - ------------ -- -- -.
Fire Marshal
MAR 2 3 2009
SOLID WASTE SECTION
ASHEVILLE rd[GIONAL OFFICE

Mar 23. 2009 10:18AM
No. 7391Pi P.
4
A Mb7 00 yyyy
0603 U 161; L21 1 20OR1 151 120-0901016
2
o late
i C00 s„a,
72 -L
rV:c * c.eev
:]vivant oq,c * x dt ten xnc:ar%i. A Pr
3 .I .A. El
b 1,6�t.��*
C
^Cpprtk:Ala Mifp'irIlvpn pa[[�.s.,W(vi Lp{.Y)::Fliea[fl ➢pvV][YI eM1-.Y.ltJpla-q
4NNYln :[ A«Uav B "A:[eLu�va .cvyfe pT[tEtaelen"UN 0.'%y Iv['l1LEle.tl :-41
�f stseei aditraea
❑mur..ttiea
1 4331
� I�-ve1Lv cx�sc7e rtrs=
I L._.._J
LJ
❑x. lrmxe ox
AT:morrH: gpppa a_o ix y;;,eee az x]ggxay
g;v-a] ^.pa
Jiff tz
8ettr oY
I t�wzJ+HA
J
I t, J 28957
J]Aa9aaaut tb
aPt.is°iedYPe:r cffv
yore roc cps
C 1ndi6ant Type *
142 b or hra.h-ymd-grass I
:nafarm_ _
El Dd�A s Times WA-,qyt is 0000
cheek baud, =f monSdf Day v^T- R, XyA ' w
da.5 A`A:a:a >ueA Diu°ya iflqul.
' Alarn * Ol ag
132 smzt s Alarmi
I taus :7ifo°
11 1 1
'seer: �t Aip[na ns.e_;.t
Aid 817en or Racaivedi,
1 []bS+stua7. lid r.0.ivgd
'%an'� ,�"Lr=a, coined n]nf�ad pe oya ao: a:x.ve
e laeaoe
IE3
2 [1Autvoatid aid racy. eaL L: snaoJg.+Yeft�
Asris.l * 97 23 1 20091J14:p3: 061r"'-'"'—
3 L'lxfub`•' aid gi[xn
�t]9raoc•'" 4,xfonet. O. foe .yxa=4i f:cee
Special Studies
4 OAntowtio aid gi"a L1
�`Caetra174d J LJ [ ]
boat
5 ❑other aid qiv _ne Lr
L+c eeanc vrn�_
:ABS JAt^ eL^.acear - 4adrai wee7:.a[ * Ld»n Lifts
L.■i 7aiC
'y"n'«T.
N ®lfaae
J ci.arsd1 OYJ 1 231 1 20091117:00:00 1SNdY
Wo to
i9' eca<r G,_ap
$ Actiorw Taken *
10 H40 m4tral Or
7a]ne:•y r.=akn Yawn (_I
ae4df eiowl x_=set rseen ;ar
L"_.j { -
➢,hfle[me1 AC:Lan :e M.r. Idl
al Aaaourcea *
1:1CTcek thin Anv en! eup one.
eracsen SY oo A,,.vAtue e:
Pero . L INN 1s Vmd.
APDBratva O.ratpywl
svP-va.1aA 0003 0012
E u
otbar �� �J
("� grr:e y°k it ----- reNnt.
I,J inplVe9 "a ideaL�vd [Decdtµ"
G23otiaatad Dollar Lossas 4 valuj
L0809; ae -i :o ai1 ft a a'more, cd :i—,
v= = ra
=a nnn fdme. NOW
9rapaxly S�1 r 000 , 000 ❑
coxa.at-. 8�.......•.� .1 00011 000
"A-m=Mrni wz=O
Property '1 000 ( 000 Q
cditt ptj $' I r t 000 a OO(o El
completed Modules $1yyCaaualtiaa❑serw $3 Hazardous Materials Raloaso mx¢d Vae property
2 rim-1 11Wt.1s. ."!. LjuYioe N [)Napo NX got MSYed
Q0"Ltotarr9 r1
2 L
1 �fiatvral "0! .L,e.:-t,.e -.-Y.orea 1avLm. 10 U50:517 nab
—I 20 74iomtiot use
❑Civil Fire Ceu.�d `-
2=r'r�tUi Caa: m to. ri Ir r. Ys w rdv.I 33 LbdScst tlaa
1❑TLp meFv. Ca■.+3 CLviliatLJ
3 ❑6aaalirgr nays m.a p.rl ee i'satWM p«sevnA: 40 n.atdm,tiaa tit.
©-s 4 ❑xsza■ana: n. .we.c t.y.«p ,. rpds�.no.w 51 xov of attres
oetaCtp 63 an(„ge.esd
'I�aaAaAvt-7 1ba+i.nd In, CO=Asd
av11
T.r-p. 5 t%iaeDl S''14i�1u12 9i1 �sw a.l ..ep w gnp6lp Be gtya, a agaldeiltial
1 ❑wa4aob aLppcpe epmyynkr 6 ❑muuariold aO1.WntJ: +../Bee... yuv. e...pv rLY $9 OY4ire +ayo
aPpar■;ve-B 7 Mwiotow eel: ea.B.mtee a. r+aYmu na.. •. fi0 Tad"WLAL we
1�tPar■anA■1-lo W❑: 2,uxt tna$ ❑PilAt: 63 Military cad
Am1
Oars ua
.]s°L.00other mind ues
J Aropasty IIae* S'trlimturpa
3410 Clib.+-0 Lypa Larswry S39 3oueahold goads ,sales, rapai.ra
342QDoctto04umtdat orris. 579 C]%C]tOr Vea.a10/boit ..Laa/xapain
131 ❑c1v-0h. place of sorau-1,
361 ❑rclata or jail, Dot jaysnilo 571 ❑n 0a■ or smviea ■tttlon
1S1 r7XD3ta x=t qr ms1*tarrla
d19❑ 1-or 2-9aaily degl1ia9 599 4.1 atceiaa.. egfiee
162 ©gar/xYtgxa or rightalub
4290244ti-Family deal.liag cis ❑uactric ganaratlsq plant
923 02; ■ t"T scta03 or . tad- &dtm
d39�]aoamingR»ardLaq rtauaF 629 laboratory/ooirLica 1NM1
215 FiyL adalLoel ar jtmi.or hio
241 scl.ge, adult aLtAostion
449�0w dotal hota2 or aoasl 700 LjWurvSact=inq yximt
459 Iwid►atiAl, board and Car■ 619 []Edo took/poultry at "*(bar71)
$11 ❑c B facility ter the c7sd
454 882 ❑N=-residmkial pa#kiW gaaago
331 ❑H0■71tal
519 Toad and brvsr.g. sales 991 Ha-hdn e
6Ateiaw
936 ❑ Vacant Lot sit.
124 QFlayyrouad or Park
938 Qaraa.Wease ter plot of lead 904 ❑ xndusteiAl zawe t yr_-d
655 []crape a ar0bard
946 ❑imkb, rives, ■ts■aa
669 Orozost (timyerlaftw
807 Outdeer
951 EjAAilMdd&A r3'4h t of Y=•3 L." ens eaten 7trree:y %;.ip rrm ac!. if
M ne.c ln7 ce1c�ea o aceaace'r Van }nY:
abxage erw
960 other ■treat 9rapn7by use 1031 I
91D t ❑^ or s.Aitary IN -a .1
961 []JU9 /dividyd highW4y ^J
531100P� lead or j1.Id
962 ❑ eei9art4A3, stxwt/dri7sfefybPyen land or Fi*Rld
Llr.Anyc e044tcr
... —. MAN 2 3 2009
SOLID V/.,\STE SECTION
ASHEVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE

A,
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Land Resources
James D. Simons, PG, PE Land Quality Section Beverly Eaves Perdue, Governor
Director and State Geologist Dee Freeman, Secretary
April 21, 2009
NOTICE OF VIOLATIONS OF THE
SEDIMENTATION POLLUTION CONTROL ACT
CERTIFIED MAIL-7008 0160 0000 7473 9023
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
County of Avery
Attn: Henry Norris, Solid Waste Director
Post Office Box 305
Newland, North Carolina 28657
RE: Project Name: Avery County Old C&D Landfill
Project ID: AVERY-2009-003
County: Avery
Compliance Deadline: May 25, 2009 or 30 days from receipt
Dear Mr. Norris:
On April 6, 2009, personnel of this office inspected a project located on Brushy Creek Road, Toe River
in Avery County, North Carolina. This inspection was performed to determine compliance with the
North Carolina Sedimentation Pollution Control Act (Act) of 1973. The inspection revealed a land -
disturbing activity of approximately 8.0 acres being conducted.
It is our understanding that you and/or your firm are responsible for this land -disturbing activity. The
purpose of this letter is to inform you that this activity was found to be in violation of theAct, G.S. 113A-
50 to 66, Title 15A, North Carolina Administrative Code (NCAC), Chapter 4. If you feel that you are not
responsible for the following violations, please notify this office immediately.
The following violations correspond to those outlined on the attached Sedimentation Inspection Report.
The violations that were found are:
5a. Failure to file an erosion and sedimentation control plan with this office 30 or more days prior to
initiating any land -disturbing activity that will disturb more than one acre on a tract, failure to
secure this office's prior approval of the plan for any land -disturbing activity prior to beginning
2090 US Highway 70, Swannanoa, North Carolina, 28778-8211
Telephone [phone] Fax [phone] One
www.ennstate.inc.us NorthCarohna
An Equal Opportunity l Affirmative Action Employer NaNrall'y

Notice of Violations
Avery County
April 21, 2009
Page 2 of 3
the land -disturbing activity. G.S. 113A-54(d)(4), G.S. 113A-57(4) and 15A NCAC 413.0107(c).
There is no current approved plan for the site.
5e. Failure when a land -disturbing activity that will disturb more than one acre is undertaken on a
tract, to install sedimentation and erosion control devices sufficient to retain the sediment
generated by the land -disturbing activity within the boundaries of the tract during construction
upon and development of the tract. G.S. 113A-57(3). Sediment has washed into creeks
onsite from disturbed slopes, ditch lines, and road surfaces.
5f. Failure to take all reasonable measures to protect all public and private property from damage
by such land -disturbing activities. 15A NCAC 4B .0105. Sediment has washed into creeks
onsite from disturbed slopes, ditch lines, and road surfaces. Sediment that has entered
creek has washed offsite.
5g. Failure to retain along designated troutwaters a buffer zone 25 feetwide or of sufficient width to
confine visible siltation by natural or artificial means within the 25 percent of that portion of the
buffer zone nearest the land -disturbing activity, whichever is greater. G.S. 113A-57(1).
Sediment has washed into unnamed tributary to Brushy Creek (Class C, trout) from
disturbed slopes, ditch lines, and road surfaces.
5j. Failure to install and maintain all temporary and permanent erosion and sedimentation control
measures as required by the approved plan or any provision of the Act, and rules adopted
thereunder, during or after the development of a site. 15 NCAC 413.0113. Measures currently
in use onsite have not been properly maintained.
To correct these violations, you must:
Submit one (1) copy of an approvable erosion and sedimentation control plan and the
appropriate plan review fee to this office. Until the required plan has been approved, no land -
disturbing activity may be conducted, except that which is necessary to bring the site into
compliance. Until an erosion and sedimentation plan has been approved, any land -disturbing
activity, except thatwhich is necessaryto bring the site into compliance, will constitute additional
violations of the Act. Following our review of the plan within 30 days of receipt, this office will
notify you that the plan has been approved, approved with modifications or disapproved.
Following approval of the plan, all land -disturbing activity on the site must be conducted in
accordance with the terms of the approved plan, the Act and the implementing rules.
2. Groundcover must be established on all slopes and bare/disturbed soil that is sufficient to
restrain erosion onsite.
3. Stabilize all roads and ditch lines with measures sufficient to restrain erosion onsite.
4. All measures onsite currently (traps, ditch lines, check dams, turn -outs along roads, etc.) must
be clean, repaired, and maintained.
5. Disturbance within buffers must be stabilized to prevent further sediment damage to the creeks -
a buffer must be established to prevent further sediment damage to the creeks onsite.

Notice of Violations
Avery County
April21, 2009
Page 3 of 3
The violations cited herein maybe referred to the Director of the Division of Land Resources (Director)
for appropriate enforcement action, including civil penalty assessments for an initial one -day violation
and/or a continuing violation. The penalty for an initial one -day violation may be assessed in an amount
not to exceed $5,000.00. The Division of Land Resources is not required to provide a time period for
compliance before assessing an initial penalty for the violations cited herein. Please be advised that a
civil penalty may be assessed for the initial day of violations regardless of whether the violations are
corrected within the time period set out below.
In addition, if the violations cited herein are not corrected within 30 days of receipt of this notice or
before May 25, 2009, whichever term is longer, this office may request that the Director take
appropriate legal action against you for continuing violations pursuant to NCGS 113A-61.1 and 113A-
64. A penalty may be assessed from the date of the violation, pursuant to NCGS 113A-64(a)(1), and for
each day of a continuing violation in an amount not to exceed $5,000.00 per day.
Please be advised that any new land -disturbing activity associated with this project should not begin
until the area presently disturbed is brought into compliance with the Act. When corrective actions are
complete, you should notify this office so that work can be inspected. You should not assume that the
project is in compliance with the Act until we have notified you. After installation, all erosion control
measures must be maintained in proper working order until the site is completely stabilized.
We solicit your cooperation, and would like to avoid taking further enforcement action. At the same
time, it is your responsibility to understand and comply with the requirements of the Act. Copies of the
relevant statute and administrative rules may be examined at this office or will be sent to you upon
request. Should you have questions concerning this notice or the requirements of the Act please
contact either Katherine Marciniak or me at your earliest convenience.
Sincerely,
Janet S. Boyer, PE
Regional Engineer
Land Quality Section
Enclosures: Sedimentation Inspection Report
Financial Responsibility Form
Erosion Control Plan Checklist
cc: Gray Hauser, PE, State Sedimentation Specialist
Roger Edwards, Regional Water Quality Supervisor

May 5, 2009
Ms. Janet S. Boyer, PE
Regional Engineer
Land Quality Section — NCDENR
1646 Mail Service Center,
Raleigh, NC 27699
RE: Notice of Violation (Project ID: Avery 2009-003)
Avery County C&D Landfill
(NC Solid Waste Permit# 06-03)
Ingalls, North Carolina
Dear Ms. Boyer:
Avery County has prepared this response to the NOV (Notice of Violation) dated April 21, 2009
(copy attached). We have been in contact with Ms. Starr Silvis of your office and offer the
following responses to address each violation followed by our proposed corrective action. Please
find each violation in italics and the associated response below.
Item No. 5a.
Failure to file an erosion and sedimentation control plan with this office 30 or more days prior to
initiating any land -disturbing activity that will disturb more than one acre on a tract, failure to
secure this
icv1)1t5tnr
ng the
land-disturbngti'ty. G.S13A-54(d(4), G.S. 13A-57(4)and 1A NAC 4B.010 (c)There
is no current approved plan for the site.
Response
As a matter of information, the site has operated under a plan approval dated September 18,
1995. In conjunction with our facility expansion, we have engaged Richardson Smith
Gardner & Associates, Inc. (RSG) to update the site Stormwater Management Plan which
is
Vari nce IRequest'.eVRSG has provided a copy of theiew by Mr. T Gray Hauser, Jr., most under
most recent communica oBuffer
ff with
Ms. Silvis. It is our opinion that his review is almost complete and we are prepared to
forward the modification request of our land disturbance permit upon his approval.
Item No. 5e.
Failure when a land -disturbing activity that will disturb more than one acre is undertaken on a
tract to install sedimentation and erosion control devices sufficient to retain the sediment
generated by the land -disturbing activity within the boundaries of the tract during
construction upon and development of the tract G.S. 113A-57(3). Sediment has
washed into creeks onsite from disturbed slopes, ditch fines, and road surfaces.
Response
Avery County is responding to this immediate situation by incorporating Best Management
Practices as shown on Figure 1 (attached) to stabilize and protect the existing area until final
approval of the Stormwater Management Plan and initiation of the Waste Relocation and
1 Trout Stream Buffer Variance Request and 401/4/4 Nationwide Permit No. 39 Application by Carolina
Ecosystems, Inc. & Richardson Smith Gardner & Associates, September 2008.

Ms. Janet S. Boyer
May 5, 2009
Page 2 of 4
Mitigation Plan conditionally approved by the Division of Waste Managements.
Item No. St.
Failure to take all reasonable measures to protect all public and private property from damage by
such land -disturbing activities. 15A NCAC 4B .0105. Sediment has washed into
creeks onsite from disturbed slopes, ditch lines, and road surfaces. Sediment that
has entered creek has washed offsite.
Response
See response to Item No. 5e (above).
Item No. 5g.
Failure to retain along designated trout waters a buffer zone 25 feet wide or of sufficient width to
confine visible siltation by natural or artificial means within the 25 percent of that portion
of the buffer zone nearest the land -disturbing activity, whichever is greater. G.S. 113A-
57(l). Sediment has washed into unnamed tributary to Brushy Creek (Class C,
trout) from disturbed slopes, ditch lines, and road surfaces.
Response
The proposed Trout Stream Buffer Variance described above was prepared in conjunction with a
Nationwide #39 Permit issued by the United State Corps of Engineers (copy attached) includes
provisions for restoration and enhancement of the stream and buffers. In the immediate term,
Avery County is responding to this immediate situation by incorporating Best Management
Practices as shown on Figure 1 (attached) to stabilize and protect the existing area until final
approval of the Stormwater Management Plan
Item No. 5j.
Failure to install and maintain all temporary and permanent erosion and sedimentation control
measures as required by the approved plan or any provision of the Act and rules
adopted thereunder, during or after the development of a site. 15 NCAC 4B .0113.
Measures currently in use onsite have not been properly maintained.
Response
See response to Item No. 5e (above).
Item No. 6
Submit one (1) copy of an approvable erosion and sedimentation control plan and the appropriate
plan review fee to this office. Until the required plan has been approved, no land -disturbing
activity may be conducted, except that which is necessary to bring the site into compliance. Until
an erosion and sedimentation plan has been approved, any land -disturbing activity, except that
which is necessary to bring the site into compliance, will constitute additional violations of the Act.
Following our review of the plan within 30 days of receipt, this office will notify you that the plan
has been approved, approved with modifications or disapproved. Following approval of the plan,
all land -disturbing activity on the site must be conducted in accordance with the terms of the
approved plan, the Act and the implementing rules.
'Waste Relocation & Mitigation Plan, Richardson Smith Gardner & Associates, October 2008.
s Condit onal Approval of "Waste Relocation & Mitigation Plan,', NCDENR, April 22, 2009,

Ms. Janet S. Boyer
May 5, 2009
Page 3 of 4
Response
See response to Item No. 5a (above).
Item No. 7
Groundcover must be established on all slopes and bare/disturbed soil that is sufficient to restrain
erosion onsite.
Response
See response to Item No. 5e (above). Additionally, Avery County will complete installation of
seed and mulch immediately.
Item No. 8
Stabilize all roads and ditch lines with measures sufficient to restrain erosion onsite.
Response
See response to Item No. 5e (above).
Item No. 9
All measures onsite currently (traps, ditch lines, check dams, turn -outs along roads, etc.) must be
clean, repaired, and maintained.
Response
See response to Item No. 5e (above).
Item No. 10
Disturbance within.buffers must be stabilized to prevent further sediment damage to the creeks- a
buffer must be established to prevent further sediment damage to the creeks onsite.
Response
See response to Item No. 5g (above).
Avery County is committed to the restoration and enhancement of this site and the overall facility
operations. We appreciate the Division's assistance in this matter. Should you have any
questions or require clarification, please contact us at your earliest convenience at (828_7Vr
5420 or by email below.
County
'Ory luc Norris
Solid Waste Director
buddy norris a(7ncmail.net
_.._ _, L-C?l }1-el' .: .. ..._'off <<r

Ms. Janet S. Boyer
May 5, 2009
Page 4 of 4
cc: Gray Hauser, PE, State Sedimentation Specialist
Bill Wagner, NCDENR — DWM Waste Management Specialist
Stacey A. Smith, P.E., RSG
Starr Silvis, NCDENR — DLQ Assistant Regional Engineer
Roger Edwards, Regional Water Quality Supervisor
C:\Users\kinialshah.RSGENGINEERS\Desktop\WORD DOCUMENWResponse to comments-Avery.doc
.. S_::�.__ _. _o _,; ._ _..,gin_ _ o -c a!9.: ''�C

AVERY COUNTY
SHORT TERM RECOMMENDED C'T�' ASSHOVM 1----_-_
BMP MEASURES one rxaBcr BB xu E RICHARDSON VIlTH GARDNER
-- — _
MAY 2009
Mey. 2009 AVEfn l AVEAY

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Asheville Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Nann B. Guthrie, Regional Manager
LETTER OF APPROVAL
September 18, 1995
Mr, Randall Fletcher
Avery County Manager
Courthouse
Newland, NC 28657
Dear Mr. Fletcher.
RECEIYLJ _.
SEP 201995
SF��ICFS C00
This office has reviewed the erosion and sedimentation control plan submitted for the project listed
below. We find the plan to be acceptable and hereby issue this Letter of Approval. Please be advised that
Title 15A, North Carolina Administrative Code 4B.0017(a), requires that a copy of the approved soil erosion
control plan be on file at the job site. Also, you should consider this letter to give the Notice required by NCGS
§113A-61(d) of our right of periodic inspection to ensure compliance with the approved plan.
The State's Sedimentation Pollution Control Program is a performance -oriented program requiring
protection of the natural resources and adjoining properties. if, fallowing commencement of this project, it is
determined that the plan is inadequate to meet the requirements of NCGS §113A51 to 66, this office may
require revisions to the plan and implementation of the revisions to ensure compliance with the Act
Please note that this approval is based in part on the accuracy of the information provided in the
Financial Responsibility Form which you have provided. You are requested to file an amended form if there
is any change in the information included on the form. In addition, it would be helpful if you notify this office
of the proposed starting date for this project. Your cooperation is appreciated -
Sincerely, t
Dennis G. Owenby
G/'
rAsst Regional Engineer
DGO:a
Enclos re
cc; r. Charlie Seymour
Project name:
Solid Waste Management Facility
Location:
Avery County
Date received:
9/11/95
New submittal ()
Revision (✓ )
Interchange Building, 59 woodfin Noce. Asheville. N.C. 28801
An `equal Opporruniiy Affirmative Action Employer
Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
50% recycled/ 10%pa51-COnS mer paper

I�y
Wr
" 2q2q�
R
kB ARPR�B
PEa aPaB^ PE`F i
NO 1.1
z
m:
i
w
m mpyl iAE I,ag ffP x�
a
i
' I;
iei?#S
[Eiz3i
f t
;jf i#r
fit'
m
i y
p
jifF
i y fit
3{
F 3f4 S i ix €S eE a
r
55 ry
R e
z
E S

n
COUNTYOF
LIN, VILLE FALLS. I NORTH CAR OLI.N.,.A
September, Ms
Municipal Engineering Services Co., R4
Garner amd,6oane, North Carolina
m

H (it)
TC(Min)
Note:
U$ehM oojiraphTG fpr natural 6a0j,n$. w.R..vell-defined ctiangelS, fOfPY9rJPrI
ii
ftw. on bar's e artk aO for ktlowed�gras,!! roadside Oanriel$.
For overland 09w, v4ssed sO.1ces, mulcipty Tc bY
l=or overland flow„concrete orr. . asphalt stirfaciis, multiply Tc. by 0.4,
For tibricreto charinels, multiply Tc by .0.2;
Figure 8,wa Time of MAcentrallori of small draTriage basins.
3,014

Appendices
Duration
'Inlem
Minutes Hours
Duration
'gore
t.
3.03.7.
3.03.7.

I
DraituageAreas!
Area Design Area (06.)
I I D IA
*LO
bjC
0,1
DD2A
6,
DD2C
O.IZ
DDIA
0
DD4A
0.35
DDQ
0.26
bwA
RntA
0.10:
DD7C
430
PIPE
114.78
SW 6aracWWOS
Soil it wall drained sandy Soil
Rai ,7ff Coe 10i'mo
Araas
Q=3 .D slur d Areas
c � 410 Asphalt Areas
094105.: sq.,t,bt, WS

Areas braining
Into Diversion Ditch #1
Area A
I
C
DDIA = 1.0acs.
6.2iaw.
.30
4$,45°Ix.30=:13
Db15 = us.
6.2inr"
J5
22 73%K,IS .. 3 ,
,0.5
DDIG = 0.7acs.
6.2i4h'W,
.70
31k-Ax.10-.22
2.2 am
6.2 hAr
3S composit-
C
=5AScts.
Areas
Drainin¢
Into Diversion Ditch #2
Area
A
I
C
y
DD2A
0:150M
6:2ia/itit.
SO
28.30,°/a1t.3b=.08
DD2B
a26 am
6.2 inW,
.30
49.06% 9.15 -,07
Di 2C
OJ2 tics:
6,2 inft
.70.
21.64%X.70 �—..16
i
=Q.53 acs:
6.2 n(h[
.31 composite C
4t1u =4C- E3z)(6,z)(t1:53) =1.02 cfs.
Areas Draining Into Diversion Ditch iA3
Area __ _ A T C
DDIA
= 1.02M
6.2intir:
<30
341MC.30=,10
DSi.IB
0.5 am
6.2 ig/hr.
.15
17.0611/o x: 15 =.t13
I?1?iG:
U.7;acs,
6,2'in/Jr.
.70
23 89%%,70 =m J7
D.D2A
0,13am
6.2intitr.
30
Di328
= 0,2$ acs.
6 2. ia/hr.
.30
D8 8 j°/a .30 =.b3
DDIC
= 0.12 acs;
6;2 tor.
170
6 10% .:70 =,03.
DD3.A
= 0.2a
¢.2an!hr.
-30
66.53°l°x.3b=.0X
=2.53 acs.
61 in/hr
.40 composite C
%0) = CIA= (.40)(6.2)(2.93) = 7.27 cis.
' Sgncn:lvr iQ?S
noel°5�� 'i'SW10.i95

Areas Draining Into Diversion Ditch #4
Area A I c.
DD4A 0:352c$, 6.2illft 10 57:3,3%? .30=.17
DD4B 0.26 cs 6.2 it lim ; .20 : - 42,,Q5S z .70 =.30 ,
= 0.61 ais. 6.2 in/hr 47 cbmpasite G
(?o)=GTi1,=1,7scfs.
Areas Drairdnginto Dii�ersion Ditch iY5
WA = 1,05acs. 6.2in/hr, 15 T89a'Co;it:1S=.12
bDSB = 0.2$ aes. fi.2 inlltr 36 2i.6*x0 .66
=133 am 6.2 irLfb r 18 composiw c
6
Q{ 0) dA = (Tisko-viris) 1.48 as -
Areas Draiising Znt DDiyersion Ditch 96
Area A T �'
DD6A 0:2a acs, 6.2 inthr. 130
0.25'abs. 6.2 inft .30
- 9.44 cis.
Q9di0.S.e "'NSO4Md95 8epwnsu Iwt

Areas DrA . nin a 106 Mer§ion Ditch in
Area
A.
1 C
DD7A
= 4A s'm
6 2 Whr, .15
32.00% x. 15'=.05
DD7B
= 4,2 acs.
Q mIhT
J)D7C:
= 43 aim
61 .30
34.40% k.36 =10
Beg,
6.1 irAr 20 mmpositc C
Q(l 0) CIA
2,5) = 15.50. cfs.
Ai(iO DrabiAR
bib. Diversion B66H
Area
A
4.3 acs.
6.21rJhr :30
4.3 ad.
6.2 inthr 430
Q(19)= C4,=
Areas Draining Into Orol) Inict
Area
A
6,26 ats.
0.2 ijijpr,
.M 36 '36% x .30 =.I
(112)DDIC
= 0.356M.
6.2 luft
6 .70 3.60/. x!.,70 0.44
0,5$ acs. 6.2 i,rvhr .55 composlte C
CIA (:55)(6.4)(945) = 1.83. 04
G94105.01

Areos Drainirlabta Drop Wet #2
Area A i c
DD2)3 = 0.26 acs. 6,2 ihft. 30
0,26 acs. 62 jrOr .30
CIA = (30)(6.2)(0-26) = OA rfs.
Areas brainint
into Drop Inlet L3
Area
A
66.46V $
PD5B
028.aqs.
6,2 inl.hr.
pDGA
0.25 za.
6-2 Mr.
30
168 am
6,2 ih&r
20 composito C.
196 COL,
Areas Distinink Into WOO Inlet
Area A
DDIA = O.acs- 6,2 hVhr.
4.0 Acs. 6,2 iiVhr -15
Q(i0)
Lroflwll-

Areas Draining
Into Sediment Basin #i
Aift.-
CP
DDIA
lo 46L
&2 W&L
DwA
6 2 fivbr.',!
rM
62 ifinii,
'l3A9%.XJ0=..17
2A
DO'
15 Acr�
. I r,
.2
02
usii
� . .....
jo
lo'
'0.70 4 i-0%
6.2 fibu
40:coifipWfd. G
Qua 7-"41 W: ,o=(M=(
tfreas p4mking into kotid-fromhz bir Creek
p eatA
44-74..
qqq

)iesign Diversion With
650.0Eiden... .0
3viamvnpz.5vaw watts Pit . i�fft
10
we
.27
m4low �Iis

Q(16):;gl L07 Cfi
Desig NyqsIon Ditch
M=3
01f4:ffp !Grass-ft64 p4iw�dzlufd NeL
1�
21(w( WID
0
opa6w rI5L9NtiSejAmikr mo

chinndStraw with fi&

DeelM Diversion Ditch #4
Q(10). = 1,79. ds
B=2ft M.3
O.Q33Straw 2.0)
19 1 ft
D 1.0'
ARY+MY2
p 4,
V-B+2MD
velwty, (v) =0,6$ ft,per sec
Una ik
Too Width
)),t,b#4. Grass -Tined chNIMI straw. with net
$el�Ki�ue legs

"QUOREMENTS

L Public Access
Avery County Solid Waste Mkriagement Site Will control access by lock and gate At
the entrance to the site. A fence will be used when treelines are not sdilicient to
prevent pubga access into the facility.
ii., surface Water Requirements
Tile landfill will not;
(i) cause a discharge of pollutants into waters of. the United States, includin
WotIA44, that vi&lates Any ftqjjiiah0I0,6f the Cleau,Watct Act,in udingbuthot
the National Pollutant; M.
1j"ed Discharge P-litaination. System IPM
re Section 402
. q on UP404M.
p Cause the dischargp of a nonpoint. source of pollution to, waters of the. Vinied
wide o . r state
including wetlands; thatviolatesIrchleiRtS 0 0114rea-
W that U dtion 269 of
wide valor hgoagpoen pan.. been Approved rider St
319, of thedean%W-tAA as amended.
p)C=4 gop sduxp of polluting point to *gto"3 of tfie voitO4 states, iftaudli*
wetlands,, :. L aivic4atei as&ioed' water quality standards.
Ground w. ter ltequmrerdents
The botton, elevation of 49%,waste DqTqqjiOon .andfill will be a
tt?iiirictztt off' above the seasonal high. water table.
TV. -Burmiag. b1f,selid. waste
This facility shall, not Ogagp in the open burning of solid waste-
V. Buffer Requirements
Cdrjktrucddn/Ddrft6lidork Landfill Q, I have a 30W UTdr between all pf9perty
lines and :disposal, Areas- Tfid Land dearin, and Inert Debris Landfill, will have a
01' 0 bufrlinen dwellih _ + , _Al _ . ,
Perbe.twe.mall r resi g§, cominem. or Publio
buildings and wells AM P& areas::
(ii) The Construction/Demolition Caudill
l will have a 500' buffer between private
gs and dwell'n' d18 and dispa"sat areas,
w

(ifj)The Construction/Demolitioa and Land Clearing and Inert. Debris Landfill. Will
have a 50 1 . buffer between streams. and rivers and disposal areas,
V1. E> bsion C611tilot
()ff and qq,gio Oimosjop,$h4jt be controlled through erosion control
structures And
devices Provisions. . - fox a vegetative ground cover sufficient to restrain: erosion shall be
01.
completioa of any
1.26 calendar upon k I d
iZuase of lanol diWej �MApproved Erc�sibh Control.Plah bas been. §ubauttO
oprm� ...
jjAddr this application.

Design Diversion Ditch #5
Q(p)
Manrdngs Straw y4j4net AoAcjenkdepA,,O.
4:.0.9 fVA
A=BY+KY2
ji=B +
,,Ai,
W +
Area/
Ditch 0 ` GraSSsTlned"Ozrkqd Straw with net.

DeSi . ed Diversion bitch #6
Jute Net WeiNcient(aePth OS 10
b 1.01
A-=.Ay�-MY7
p -P.+ 7x**W))
A- A+l'
Q—A
W.= ] -F 2W
ossecizvtral area (A) _ JP q.
t
i=i3O6ek'sec
linkg imax
iditvq&h (W) Z# 10,0.-
Dit.kh 6r Sg-]Jnt 40aund4ut0et

,Desilga NVEts�W D itch V!
B �= 10A M;w:3.
A;Fp.om,5
s*,05'"
B-1
13Y +
R't- AO'
V*Q',A.:
4,43ft per s

(?Oo) 40,44
V
W=6+24D
I

15ROP•INMT
PAO
j7
.3 5
o d.4
4�A
:Use, 12

DROP) ETU
FridAA&
s . =.0-
LihV W'Ir
024 05
11,03" itse42'
outjctPrb(tC(16xi
450*6" 1,3 M �5 im
kAi�X4,4� C 1-612
$W -4d. AM — Arles
ma
*A.W
Sc*w li4s

i
DMIGNRISERBASMI
3
u I' topa NAd. Ji6D
,
het 0''0
47
Bdftdiff Area —30* X IM'
A,
tpa
D..a 16PS)(M4
1:
61,1101,46vivil.095
$�m�s

Fooft. f6K AW Pipe,:
.2
6Z4)
iisc:lfi0:i3
cw
If
44
1nduit Inler
"Z;p1;1.ri s

19
1#44
Vaitsetk# liranotf Cagffici4A
(COGr Rational �Oftntxla'
4t
Land M61
:.C: :Ldftd U44
Q
paWntatYti areas
A7.0-0,45 6 . Z . E6
4rogq
V�L, V7%
' 9�qcj�.g tip
(LI
-O
b.
fieaYXsa f 5 itv �Z'O/A'
2'0' -o 5
0 *0
-060
RUM
OQ,., Wq. .4. Q :9
areas
Vvo'o- d VO W 4
to Pr
0
Aadcs,Rtieterres
bao-445
2
play
N WOMao p
toil,
Mph -Olt I iia
a ffa4.0
AMMA
Th
la and
v UI...
S94t.stqQwsirpeg,
.;
I '�. ��
:sparse ye�gtatxzfl s%Ruid be
*,kAmo swbiypm�. rVarRoop pblqr's
47
I !t
&W

Satf Grass
to fass,
`40[t^t'3:a5ilG: Tail 0�.Cu
... s
was):
Jq4
. . . . . . . . . .
88bbflhq Ghaflnef,
Geometry
th=
4.f.
'Ald
,td:
kd
�0
0-5.
&0
g,d;
40
�p "T-44Rpa, p9-

Manfiii+g`s Raugtttress
'. �o@ft�GEe..tCsfarTe�pai'at}�
ixrFttzg' iVla�t`i8ts
n v;Oasfor-depth RangW
Y�ricrig`CyF�e;
lNovea;FaperNQt:
9:01¢
0ai�
40'IS
JUF�.N 1
p628
it-d2i
6 wi
.rR(asspatiTgg
d_028
L%Q2t
atii�
#[ yr tiv Fti Net:.
OA5
Mm
0•025
Cc Fded WadgaF
a a.S�,
0 0§5
a O
$yalhet�e ?
a fi
0 a25
a 02'f
AdaRt ; rqm EIi�YA F CC F .leg 37 44 f
Tote &oi
, "
MatttttFti�s t��trg�sr� Coeffrcte�t ForFl�psap antf�rav�t
lit vaWe far't7apth.Rattes
,.
t2ti d d5A l7Cili5 �'
IS fv
GraueF t
ii
A�d��
ba��;
4�.7a"
Ritirap S
MIA
0454.
� 0 044,
12
p74T'
dat�64:
O:a69
>i iz53 y
ma
�{
0;'FSB:
P:0A55
0:07tl
2d
;iFt1OS
�y;�by'
'o.Ozs.
s.

AppMdtces
Im
Oprv,ps mqy
OP 10P.
3

I
z
U74.1b
0. �f6
. ... ...
D90T
A
Ki
z
0:4 47
0111
b
6H
6.4111-5
6.61
VI-9

, i R
6A
I
n at
. . . . . . . . . ...
ti
:4
1�

4m�

N, --
RICHARDSON S� GARDNER
ENGiNEEMG & GEOLOGICAL
aerV Wa.s
May 1, 2009
Ms. Jaclynne Drummond
NCDENR — Division of Waste Management
Solid Waste Section
1646 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1646
Dear Ms. Drummond:
As you are aware, Richardson Smith Gardner and Associates, Inc. (RSG) collected samples from
the Avery County C&D landfill on March 30`h — 3151 for the spring groundwater monitoring
event. The locations of the wells sampled are shown on the attached Figure 1. Of the samples
collected, two were from potable wells located off -site ( at the Frye residence and the Wise
residence) and one sample was collected from the on -site non -potable well. Of these three wells,
the Frye potable well and the on -site non -potable well have been of particular interest to
NCDENR regarding water quality and future use of these wells. This letter will outline the
results of the sample analysis and provide recommendations for future actions regarding these
wells.
Analysis of Groundwater from Potable and Non -Potable Wells
The well located at the Wise residence has been added to the regular semi-annual regimen at the
direction of the Avery County Board of Commissioners. Analysis of the water from the Wise
well (located approximately 315 feet from the property line to the west) indicates no detectable
quantities of the constituents analyzed with the exception of several inorganic constituents that
were detected at concentrations below the solid waste section quantitation limits (SWSLs) and
are reported as "J" values on the attached Table 1 and analytical report. This well was sampled
at the Board of Commissioners request and will continue to be included in semi-annual
groundwater monitoring events.
The well located at the Frye residence was sampled as a part of the Waste Relocation and
Mitigation P1ani evaluation of the site. The Frye well is located approximately 300 feet from the
existing edge of waste to the south. This well was constructed to a depth of 220 feet below grade
into granitic bedrock. Analysis of groundwater from this well indicates a detection of zinc that is
above the SWSL but below the 2L groundwater standard (15A NCAC 2L.0202). Nine (9) other
inorganic constituents were detected at concentrations below the SWSLs. Additionally, two
organic constituents (carbon disulfide and toluene) were detected at concentrations below the
SWSLs. It should be noted that toluene was not detected at any other well location sampled
during this event.
Richardson Smith Gardner and Associates, Inc, Avery County Waste Relocation and Mitigation Plan, October
2008
14 N. BOYLAN AVENUE • RALEIGH, NC 27603 • TEL: [phone] • FAX [phone] • WWW.RSGENGINEERS.COM

Ms. Drummond
May 1, 2009
Page 2 of 3
The non. -potable well located on -site was also sampled as a part of the Waste Relocation and
Mitigation Plan evaluation of the site. Analysis of the on -site non -potable well similarly yielded
a detection of zinc at a concentration above the SWSLs but below the 21, standard, with twelve
(12) other organic constituents detected below the SWSLs. Additionally, one organic constituent
(carbon disulfide) was detected at a concentration below the SWSL. The laboratory data for
these wells is summarized in the attached Table 1. The analytical report is also included as
Attachment 1 for your review.
As you know, detections below the SWSL are inconclusive due to their low concentration and
limitations of laboratory equipment. The only constituent detected above the SWSL in the
potable wells and the non -potable well sampled was zinc, which is naturally occurring and was
detected at concentrations below the 2L standard. Based upon this analysis it is our opinion that
the groundwater at these wells is unimpacted by the landfill.
Analysis of Groundwater from Monitoring Wells
Analysis of groundwater from the four (4) monitoring wells on -site indicate detectable
concentrations of barium, beryllium, cadmium, copper chromium, iron, manganese, lead,
mercury, vanadium, zinc. Other inorganic constituents were detected at levels below the
SWSLs. Inorganic constituents are naturally occurring in groundwater in this area of North
Carolina. Five organic constituents (chloromethane, acetone, LI dichloroethane, cis-1,2
dichloroethene, and xylenes) were detected at concentrations below the SWSLs. These data are
also summarized in Table 1. It should be noted that acetone is a common laboratory
contaminant.
Conclusions and Recommendations
In general, these samples indicate no impact from the C&D landfill. Elevated concentrations of
naturally occurring inorganic constituents are likely due to elevated turbidity in samples from the
monitoring wells on -site. Due to the lack of impact from the landfill on the on -site non -potable
well it should continue to be used for non -potable purposes and remain as is. Analysis of the
water from monitoring well CDMW-1 indicates no impact from the landfill, and analysis of
water from the Frye well also indicates no impact. From this we conclude that the Frye well will
not be needed as a monitoring point for future evaluations and should be released from further
discussion. Based upon this analysis of groundwater, we recommend the following:
1. Addition of the on -site non -potable well to the semi-annual monitoring program; and
2. Continued use of the on -site non -potable well by the Avery County Landfill.
If you have any questions or require additional information, please contact me at 919-828-0577 x
122.

Ms. Drummond
May 1, 2009
Page 3 of 3
Sincerely,
Richardson Smith Gardner and Associates, Inc.
Cow.
Joan A. Smyth, P.G.
Senior Hydrogeologist
Attachments
Cc: Bill Wagner — NCDENR ARO
Allen Gaither — Permitting Engineer ARO/SWS
Deb Aja — Western District Supervisor ARO/SWS
Mark Poindexter — Field Operations Branch Head DWM/SWS
Henry Norris — Avery County Solid Waste Director
Robert Wiseman — Avery County Manager
Starr Silvis—ARO/LQS
G. Landon Davidson — APS Regional Supervisor ARO
Julie Vann — Env. Senior Technician ARO
File

c
m
.N
o c
� U o
C V O
06 O M
w 0 0 M
m
H R O
o 2 m
0 C S
a E
j 0 M
a�
W
u
m
m
0
C
C
E
W
W
W
W
W
W
d
c
t
E
E
U
O
000
00
T
zzz
_
T
>
12 1212E
EE
E
m
lzi
I
I
I
I
mmm
lZIZIZ
I
I
I
I
mm
Izz
o
U
YY
0
0
N.
oNzVnroZZZZZo
TO�rO
v.N
0
ZZMZZzZz
Z
O
OO
OO�',❑0000000
ZZWZZOO
ZZZZZZZZZZZNOO,MNZDO--1
N
0
li
cRibOF
N
00N000000
0N�Ma
Zo�
ZZZZZZZZ
oN❑
NNO—O
OfOOO
m�c�Wo-
OM
OO-r
Zzzzzzzzz
M�r1n
NOl
OzO
MamZ
OC
OO
O=
o
O
OrNO
W
QM
oO
OO
Z
Z
M
o
W
�M,�^'tm
❑
ONOO
o0
00
z
O
w-
oo(r
i
z
Z
ZZ
Zz
ZZ
r
c
m
O
0
Lq
w
O�
O
O
INN
7
M
m
O
N
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
O
O
�,
Z
Z
o�
�
Z
o
Z
Z
m
Z
Z
Z
Z
Z
Z
Z
Z
Z
i
0
0
lq'
O
-'
0�
0
0'
0
0U
I
000000000
z
Z�
o
z
o-7
o
z
o
z
z
o
z
z
z
o
o
Z
Z
Z
Z
Z
Z
Z
Z
Z
N
r
N
0
0'
M
f0
0
00100010
ow
Coco
0
0
oo�ZZo
ozozZ-ZZZ.-m
p
z
zzzzozz
M
r
'-
�
0
0
?
t
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
N
O
O
O
N
i0
O
O
O
O
N
h
O
i0
u{' �
y
C
d
d.
C
u
C
d
C
N
N
9
L
d
d
u
E
U
L
'pc
E
EE
OE
E
c
`
E
Ndm
rOvdom
°
C
dm
`m
UzdmUUQU
n
`°-'
���ZVnH>NOQm
Q_�°UOmrvoc
Fo-�F2
Xd
0
E
0
U
m
N
O
E v
E 'o
� a
a d
c
d
Q C
d
n �
O
O d
N
a O
d E
LL d
C E
N d
O r
E c
d J
� 3 o �
y d
N S
ad N N
j N �
c
U °
N Q
o U E
N Z J
0
O o 5
W �p c
a a
_ c U
E �
m
O J O 3
O o cc m
a c °
C d N
O y
o O J Y
y N N d N
d v o ° 0
y U � d O �
to ZJU❑ y
. y
m c
LL d
5z W
0 � p
c J 3 c
(7 U L nn
o w y
6] y J
C N
O y
m J
o
Q

Attachment 1
Analytical Report

he upopmbd RECT APR 2 8 2009
7.17
X 0OfakC - 08 DRIVVILLE, N.0 27835-7085 FAX [phone]
ID#: 6057 A
AVERY COUNTY C&D LANDFILL
MS. JOAN SMYTH
RICHARDSON SMITH GARDNER DATE COLLECTED: 03/31/09
14 N. BOYLAN AVENUE DATE REPORTED 04/24/09
RALEIGH ,NC 27603
REVIEWED BY:
Frye well Wine Well Analysis Method
PARAMETERS MDL SWSL ➢ate Analyst Code
Antimony, ug/1 0.06 6.0 0.2 J --- U 04/08/09 LFJ EPA200.8
Arsenic, ug/1 0.17 10.0 0.7 J --- B 04/08/09 LFJ EPA200.8
Barium, ug/l 0.04 100.0 71.2 J 45.6 J 04/08/09 LFJ EPA200.8
Beryllium, ug/l 0.06 1.0 --- 1 0.2 J 04/08/09 LFJ EPA200.8
Cadmium, ug/1 0.04 1.0 --- ➢ --- B 04/08/09 LFJ EPA200.8
Cobalt, ug/1 0.02 10.0 0.1 J 0.1 J 04/08/09 LFJ EPA200.8
Copper, eg/1 0.04 10.0 1.3 J 1.1 J 04/08/09 LFJ EPA200.8
Total Chromium, ug/l 0.10 10.0 0.6 J 0.6 J 04/00/09 LFJ EPA200.8
Lead, ug/1 0.04 10.0 0.4 J 0.11 04/08/09 LFJ EPA200.8
Nickel, ug/1 0.04 50.0 1 J 0.5 J 04/00/09 LFJ EPA200.8
Selenium, ug/1 0.12 10.0 --- v --- U 04/08/09 LFJ EPA200.8
Silver, ug/1 0.04 10.0 --- U --- ➢ 04/08/09 LPJ EPA200.8
Thallium, u9/1 0.03 5.0 --- 0 --- ➢ 04/08/09 LFJ EPA200.8
Vanadium, vg/l 0.28 25.0 1 J 0.9 J 04/08/09 LFJ EPA200.8
Zinc, ug/l 0.14 10.0 69 8.4 J 04/08/09 LFJ EPA200.8
J = Between MDL and SWSL, U - Below ALL 4uanititation Limits.

Flo hamporrmUd
CLIENT: AVERY COUNTY C&D LANDFILL
MS. JOAN SMYTH
RICHARDSON SMITH GARDNER
14 N. BOYLAN AVENUE
RALEIGH, NC..7603
REVIEWED BY:
VOLATILE ORGANICS
EPA METHOD 8260E
CLIENT ID: 6057 A
ANALYST: MAO
DATE COLLECTED: 03/31/09
DATE ANALYZED: 04/07/09
DATE REPORTED: 04/24/09
PARAMETERS, ug/1
AIDL
SWBL
Frye Well
Wise Well
1.
Chloromethane
0.18
1.0
---
❑
---
u
2.
Vinyl Chloride
0,34
1.D
---
D
---
D
3.
Bromomethane
0.26
10.D
---
0
---
u
4.
Chloroethane
0.29
10.0
---
D
---
u
5.
Trichlor0fluoromethans
D.13
1.0
---
u
---
D
S.
1,1-Dichloroethene
0.14
5.0
---
u
---
D
7.
Acetone
1.21
100.0
---
u
---
u
8.
Lodomethane
0.12
10.0
---
u
---
u
9.
Carbon Disulfide
0.14
100.0
1.80
J
---
u
10.
Methylene Chloride
0.14
1.0
---
u
---
u
11.
trans-1,2-Dichloroethane
0.13
5.0
---
u
---
u
12.
1,1-Dichloroetbane
0.16
5.0
---
D
---
u
13.
Vinyl Acetate
0.20
50.D
---
❑
---
u
14.
Cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
0.14
5.D
---
0
---
u
15.
2-Butanone
0.85
1D0.0
---
❑
---
u
16.
Bromochloromethane
0.11
3.0
.--
u
---
u
27.
Chloroform
0.13
5.0
---
u
---
u
18.
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
0.11
1.0
---
u
---
0
19.
Carbon Tetrachloride
0.13
1.0
---
u
---
0
20.
Benzene
0.16
1.0
---
❑
---
u
21.
1,2-Dichloroetbane
0.12
1.0
---
0
---
0
22.
Trichloroethene
0.13
1A
---
D
---
u
23.
1,2-Dichloropropane
0.17
1.D
---
u
---
u
24.
Bromodichlorome thane
0.13
1.0
---
u
---
u
25.
Cie-1.3-Dichloropropene
0.17
1.0
---
u
---
u
26.
4-Methyl-2-Pentanone
0.68
100.0
---
u
---
u
27.
Toluene
0.13
1.0
0.30
J
---
u
28.
crane-1,3-Dichloropropene
0.14
1.0
---
u
---
u
29.
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
0.2D
1.0
---
D
---
u
30.
Tetrachloroethene
0.16
1.0
---
u
---
u
31.
2-Hexanone
1.00
50.0
---
u
---
u
32.
Dibromochloromethane
0.14
3.0
---
u
---
u
33.
1,2-Dibromoethane
0.13
1.0
---
u
---
u
34.
Chlorob enx ene
0.13
3.0
---
D
---
❑
35.
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane
0.14
5.0
---
O
---
u
36.
Ethylben.ene
0.26
1.0
---
u
---
u
37.
Yylenee
0.48
5.0
---
u
---
u
38.
Dibromomethane
0.17
10.0
---
u
---
D
39.
Styrene
0.16
1.0
---
u
---
u
40.
Bromoform
0.11
3.0
---
u
---
9
41.
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethene
0.16
3.0
---
D
---
u
42.
1,2,3-Trichloropropane
0.06
1.0
---
D
---
u
43.
1,4-Dichlorobenaene
0.22
1.0
---
u
---
D
44.
1,2-1,ichlorobenzene
0.13
5.0
---
u
---
u
45.
1,2-➢ibrom0-3-Chl.ropropane
D.26
13.0
---
u
---
u
46.
Acrylonitrile
1.49
2Do.0
---
u
---
u
47.
trans-1,4-Dichloro-2-Butene
0.14
100.0
---
u
---
u
J = Between MDL and SWBL, 0 = Below ALL Quanititation Limit..
Page: 1

,I
s 7LL
3�It .ksI ,. Ihi I• IIPO, BOX114 OAKM0 1 DRIVE OGREENVN.C., 27835-7085 FAX (252) 756-Ofi3i
ID#: 6057 A
- AVERY COUNTY C&D LANDFILL
MS. JOAN SMYTH
RICHARDSON SMITH GARDNER DATE COLLECTED: 03/30/09
14 N. BOYLAN AVENUE DATE REPORTED : 04/24/09
RALEIGH ,NC 27603
REVIEWED BY: /
SW-1 SW-2 On -Site Analysis Method
PARAMETERS MDL SWSL Well Date Analyst Code
Anti many, ug/1 0.06 6.0 --- ❑ --- D 0.7 J 04/03/09 LFJ EPA200.8
Arsenic, ug/l 0.17 10.0 --- D 0.2 J 0.4 J 04/03/09 RJH EPA200.8
Barium, ug/1 0.04 100.0 24.4 J 22.6 J 41.8 ❑ 04/03/09 LFJ EPA200.8
f Beryllium, ug/l 0.06 1.0 0.2 J 0.11 --- D 04/D3/09 LFJ EPA200.8
Cadmium, ug/1 0.04 1.0 0.11 --- ❑ --- ❑ 04/03/09 LFJ EPA200.8
Cobalt, ug/1 0.02 10.0 1.5 J 1.4 J 0.5 J 04/03/09 LFJ EPA200.8
Copper, ug/1 0.04 10.0 3 J 2.5 J 3.8 J 04/03/09 LPJ EPA200.8
Total Chromium, ug/1 0.10 10.0 2.3 J 1.6 J 1 J 04/03/09 LFJ EPA200.8
Lead, ug/1 0.04 10.D 1.4 0 1.1 J 0.3 J 04/03/09 LFJ EPA200.8
Nickel, ug/1 0.04 50.D 1.9 J 1.6 J 1.2 J 04/03/09 LFJ EPA20D.8
Selenium, ug/1 0.12 10.0 --- D - v 0.2 J 04/03/09 LFJ EPA200.8
Silver, ug/l 0.04 10.0 -- ❑ --- v D.1 J 04/03/09 LFJ EPA200.8
Thallium, ug/l 0.03 5.0 0.1 J 0.1 J 0.1 J 04/03/09 LFJ EPA200.8
Vanadium, ug/1 0.28 25.0 6 J 5.2 J 3.3 J 04/03/09 LFJ EPA200.8
zinc, ug/l 0.14 10.0 7..7J 11 58 04/03/09 LFJ EPA200.8
J - Between MDL and SWSL, U = Below ALL Quanititation Limits.

CLIENT: AVERY COUNTY C&D LANDFILL
MS. JOAN SMITH
RICHARDSON SMITH GARDNER
14 N. BOYLAN AVENUE
RALEIGH, NC 27603
REVIEWED BY:
VOLATILE ORGANICS
EPA METHOD 8260E
CLIENT ID: 6057 A
ANALYST: MAO
DATE COLLECTED: 03/30/09 Page: 1
DATE REPORTED: 04/24/09
PARAMETERS, ug/1
Date
MDL
Analyzed
SWSL
04/O6/09
SW-1
04/07/09
SW-2
04/07/09
On -Site
Well
1.
Chloromethane
0.18
1.0
---
❑
---
V
---
U
2.
Vinyl Chloride
0.34
1.0
---
D
---
U
---
U
3.
Bzomomethane
0.26
10.0
---
D
---
U
---
U
4.
Chloroethane
0.29
10.0
---
D
---
U
---
U
5.
THChlozoElucromethane
0.13
1.0
-__
U
___
U
--.
❑
6.
1,1-DSchloroethene
0.14
5.0
---
V
---
❑
---
U
7.
Acetone
1.21
100.0
---
0
1.30
J
---
U
S.
Iodomethane
0.12
10.0
---
U
---
U
---
U
9.
Carbon Disulfide
0.14
100.0
---
U
---
U
0.20
J
10-
Methylene Chloride
0.14
1.0
---
U
---
9
---
0
11.
trans-1,2-DiChloreethene
0.13
5.0
---
U
---
U
---
D
12.
1,1-Dichloroethane
0.16
5.0
_--
D
___
U
---
D
13.
Vinyl Acetate
0.20
50.0
---
0
---
U
---
U
14.
Cl.-1,2-Dlchloroe thane
0.14
5.0
---
❑
---
❑
---
U
15.
2-Butanone
0.85
100.0
---
9
---
U
---
U
16.
Bromochloromethane
0.11
3.0
---
U
---
U
---
U
17.
Chloroform
0.13
5.0
---
D
---
U
---
❑
18.
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
0.11
1.0
---
U
---
D
---
U
19.
Carbon Tetrachloride
0.13
1.0
---
U
---
U
---
U
20.
Benzene
0.16
1.0
---
R
---
D
---
U
21.
1,2-➢ichloroethane
0.12
1.0
---
U
---
D
---
U
22.
Ttichloroethene
0.13
1.0
---
U
---
D
---
U
23.
1,2-Dichloropropane
0.17
1.0
---
U
---
U
---
U
24.
BromodiChloromethans
0.13
1.0
---
U
---
U
---
❑
25.
Cie-1,3-DichlOropropene
0.17
1.0
---
U
---
U
---
U
26.
4-Methyl-2-Pentanone
OAS
100.0
---
U
---
U
---
U
27.
Toluene
0.13
1.0
---
U
---
U
---
U
26.
trans-1,3-Dlchloropropene
0.14
1.0
---
U
---
U
---
0
29.
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
0.20
1.0
---
U
---
U
---
U
30.
Tetrachloroethene
0.16
1.0
---
U
---
D
---
D
31.
2-Hexanone
1.00
50.0
_.-
U
---
U
---
U
32.
Dibromochloromethane
0.14
3.0
---
U
---
➢
---
U
33.
1,2-Dibromoethane
0.13
1.0
---
U
---
U
---
U
34.
Chlorobenzene
0.13
3.0
---
U
---
D
---
U
35.
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane
0.14
5.0
---
❑
---
U
---
U
36.
Ethylbenzene
0.16
1.0
---
❑
---
D
---
V
37.
Xylenee
0.45
5.0
---
U
---
D
---
U
38.
Dlbzomomethane
0.17
10.0
---
U
---
U
---
U
39.
Styrene
0.26
1.0
---
U
---
U
---
U
40.
Bramoform
0.11
3.0
---
U
---
D
---
U
41.
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
0.16
3.0
---
U
---
U
---
U
42.
1,2,3-Trichloropropane
0.06
1.0
---
U
---
U
---
U
43.
1,4-Dichlerobenzene
0.21
1.0
---
D
---
❑
---
D
44.
1,2-DSChlo"banzene
0.131
5.0
---
U
---
U
---
U
45.
1,2-Dlbromo-3-Chlorupropane
0.26!
13.0
---
U
---
U
---
U
46.
Acrylonitrile
1.49'
200.0
---
❑
---
U
-
47.
trane-1,4-Dichloro-2-Butene
0.14
100.0
---
U
---
U
---
U
J - Between MDL and SWSL, V - Below ALL QuanititatlOn Limits.

EIMATmEaml Tp 01mmpop Ud 11
AVERY COUNTY C&D LANDFILL
MS. JOAN SMYTH
RICHARDSON SMITH GARDNER
14 N. BOYLAN AVENUE
RALEIGH ,NC 27603
PARAMETBRS MDL
Total Alkalinity, mg/l
1.0
Chloride, mg/1
5.0
Total Dissolved
Residue, mg/l
1.0
Sulfate, mg/l
5.0
Antimony, ug/l
0.06
Antimony, ug/l
0.06
Arsenic, ug/l
0.17
Arsenic, ug/1
0.17
Barium, ug/l
0.04
Barium, ug/1
0.04
Beryllium, ug/1
0.06
Beryllium, ug/l
0.06
Cadmium, ug/1
0.04
Cadmium, ug/1
0.04
Cobalt, ug/1
0.02
Cobalt, ug/1
0.02
Copper, ug/l
0.04
Copper, ug/1
0.04
Total Chromium,
ug/l
0.20
Total Chromium,
ug/1
0.10
Iron, ug/1
14.0
Manganese, ug/1
0.50
Lead, ug/l
0.04
Lead, ug/1
0,04
Mercury, ug/l
0.03
Mercury, u9/1
0.03
Mercury. ug/1
0.03
Nickel, ug/1
0.04
Nickel, ug/l
0.04
selenium, ug/1
0.22
Selenium, ug/l
0.12
Silver, ug/1
0.04
silver, ug/l
0.04
Thallium, ug/l
0.03
Thallium, ug/l
0.03
Vanadium, ug/1
0.28
Vanadium, ug/l
0.28
Zinc, ug/1
0.14
Zinc, ug/1
0.14
CDMW-1
CDMW-2
SWSL
1.0
D
32
5.0
--- U
8
1.D
43
116
250.0
--- ❑
23.2 J
6.0
--- U
0.1 J
6.0
10.0
1J
1.5a
10.0
100.0
506
617
100.0
1.0
1.9
2-1
1.0
1.0
1.3
0.6 J
1.0
10.0
5.1 J
8.3 J
10.0
10.0
14
19
10.0
10.0
14
21
10.0
300.0
49300
46150
50.0
632
1180
10.0
6 J
10
10.0
0.20
0.11 J
0.15 J
0.20
0.20
50.0
8.9 J
13.8 J
50.0
10.0
1.1J
0.9J
10.0
10.0
0.1J
0.2J
10.0
5.0
0.3 J
0.3 J
5.0
25.0
56
28
25.0
10.0
79
105
10.0
J - Between MDL sad SWSL, D = Below ALL Qua. ititatioa Limit..
ID#: 6057
DATE COLLECTED: 03/31/09
DATE REPORTED : 04/27/09
REVIEWED BY: .�
CDMW-3
CDMW-4
Analysis
Method
Date Analyst
Code
22
8
01/01/09
TRB
SM2320B
--- ❑
--- ❑
04/07/09
MJN
SM4500-CLB
46
44
04/06/09
TRB
SM2540C
--- ❑
--- ❑
04/07/09
IRS
SM4500-SO4E
04/03/09
LFJ
EPA200.B
0.1 J
0.7 J
04/08/09
LPJ
EPA200.8
04/03/09
RJH
EPA200.8
2.4 J
0.2 J
04/08/09
LFJ
EPA20D.8
04/03/09
LFJ
EPA20D.8
304
31.6 J
04/08/09
LFJ
EPA200.8
04/03/09
LFJ
EPA200.8
2.1
0.5 J
04/08/09
LFJ
EPA200.8
04/03/09
LFJ
EPA200-8
0.4 J
0.1 J
04/08/09
LFJ
EPA200.8
04/03/09
LFJ
EPA200.8
7.8 J
7.2 J
04/08/09
LFJ
EPA200.8
04/03/09
LFJ
EPA200.8
12
6.3 J
04/08/09
LFJ
EPA200.8
04/03/09
LFJ
EPA20D.8
22
8.6 J
04/O0/09
LFJ
EPA20D.8
26900
6455
04/06/09
ADD
SM3111B
452
202
04/06/09
LFJ
EPA200.7
04/03/09
LFJ
EPA200.8
17
3 J
04/08/09
LPJ
EPA200.8
04/03/09
LFJ
EPA200.8
4.7
04/23/09
ADD
EPA245.1
O.D7 J
04/08/09
LFJ
EPA200.8
04/03/09
LFJ
EPA200.8
9.5 J
5.3 J
04/00/09
LFJ
EPA200.8
04/03/09
LFJ
EPA200.9
1.11
--- ❑
04/08/D9
LFJ
EPA200.8
04/03/09
LFJ
EPA200.8
0.2 J
0.1 J
04/08/09
LFJ
EPA200.8
04/03/09
LFJ
EPA200-8
0.3 J
0.1 J
04/08/09
LFJ
EPA200.B
04/03/09
LFJ
EPA200.8
31
11.5 J
04/08/09
LFJ
EPA200.8
04/03/09
LFJ
EPA200.8
BO
11
04/08/09
LFJ
EPA200.8

EmkolmnaU % Hiumpor ego
CLIENT: AVERY COUNTY C&D LANDFILL
MS. JOAN SMYTH
RICHARDSON SMITH GARDNER
14 N. BOYLAN AVENUE
RALEIGH, NC �7603
REVIEWED BY:
VOLATILE ORGANICS
EPA METHOD 8260B
CLIENT ID: 6057
ANALYST: MAO
DATE COLLECTED: 03/31/09
DATE ANALYZED: 04/07/09
DATE REPORTED: 04/27/09
PARAMETERS, Ug/1
MDL
SWSL
CDMM-1
CDMW-2
CDMW-3
CDMW-4
1.
Chloxomethane
0.18
1.0
---
0
0.50
--
❑
---
U
2.
Vinyl Chloride
0.34
1.0
---
U
'.-
U
_.-
U
_-_
U
3.
Bromom ethane
0.26
10.0
---
0
---
U
.-
U
___
0
9.
Chloro ethane
0.29
10.0
---
U
---
0
--
U
---
0
5.
Trichlorofluoromethane
0.13
1.0
---
❑
---
U
---
U
---
❑
6.
1,1-Dichloroethene
0.14
5.0
---
U
---
U
---
U
---
U
7.
Acetone
1.21
100.0
1.50
J
1.30
J
---
U
1.50
J
B.
Iodomethane
0.12
10.0
---
❑
---
U
---
U
---
U
9.
Carbon Disulfide
0.14
100.0
---
U
---
U
---
U
---
U
10.
Methylene Chloride
0.14
1.0
---
❑
---
U
---
U
---
U
11.
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
0.13
5.0
__-
U
__-
❑
_-_
0
.--
❑
12.
1,1-Dichloroethane
0.16
5.0
---
U
0.40
J
---
U
---
❑
13.
vinyl Acetate
0.20
50.0
---
U
---
U
---
0
---
U
14.
Cie-1,2.Dichloroethene
0.14
5.0
---
U
0.80
J
---
U
---
❑
15.
2-eutanone
0.85
100.0
---
II
---
0
❑
-._
U
16.
eromochloromethane
0.11
3.0
---
U
...
U
-_-
U
_--
U
17.
Chloroform
0.13
5.0
---
U
---
U
II
-
➢
18.
1,3,1-Trichloroethane
0.11
1.0
---
D
---
U
---
v
---
U
19.
Carbon Tetrachloride
0.13
1.0
---
U
---
U
---
U
---
U
20.
Benzene
0.16
1.0
---
U
---
❑
---
U
---
0
21.
1,2-Dichloroethane
D-12
1.0
---
U
---
❑
---
U
---
U
22.
Trichloroethene
0.13
1.0
---
U
---
U
---
U
---
U
23.
1,2.Dichloropropane
0.17
1.0
---
❑
---
U
---
U
---
❑
24.
Bromodichloromethane
0.13
1.0
---
U
---
U
---
U
---
U
25.
Cie-1,3-pic hlo zop ropene
0.17
1.0
__-
U
___
U
---
❑
__-
U
26.
4-Methyl-2-Pen tenons
0.68
100.0
___
0
--_
U
___
U
--_
U
27.
Toluene
0.13
1.0
---
U
'--
U
'--
U
---
U
28.
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
0.14
1.0
---
❑
---
U
---
U
---
U
29.
1, 1,2-Trichloroethane
0.20
1.0
__-
U
_-_
V
_--
U
___
U
30.
Tetrachloroethene
0.16
1.0
---
U
---
D
---
U
---
U
31.
2-Hexanone
1.00
50.0
-_-
U
-__
U
___
U
___
❑
32.
Dibromochloromethane
0.14
3.0
---
U
---
D
---
U
---
U
33.
1,2-Dibxomo ethane
0.13
1.0
---
U
---
U
---
U
---
U
34.
Chlorobenzene
0.13
3.0
---
U
---
U
---
0
---
U
35.
1,1, 1, 2-T et rachloroethane
0.14
5.0
---
U
___
U
___
U
---
U
36.
Ethylbenaene
0.16
1.0
_--
U
-__
U
___
U
_--
U
37.
Xylenee
0.48
5.0
---
V
3.50
J
---
U
---
U
38.
Dibromomethane
0.17
10.0
---
U
---
U
---
U
---
U
39.
Styrene
0.16
1.0
---
9
---
U
---
9
---
U
40.
Bromo Yorm
0.11
3.0
---
U
---
U
---
9
---
❑
41.
1, 1,2,2-Tetrac hloruethane
0.16
3.0
42.
1,2,3-Trichloropropene
0.06
3.0
'--
U
---
U
---
U
._-
U
43.
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
0.21
1.0
---
U
---
0
---
0
---
U
44.
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
0.13
5.0
"-.
U
-__
U
-__
0
.--
U
95.
1,2-Oibromo-3-Chloropropane
0.26
13.0
---
U
---
V
---
U
---
U
46.
Acrylonitrile
1.49
200.0
---
U
---
U
---
U
---
97.
trans-1,4-Dichloro-2-Butane
1 0.39
300.0
--_
U
___
U
-__
0
_--
U
J - Between MDL and SWSL, U = Below ALL Quanititation Limits.
Page: 1

OZ
w
H
�
I
U
¢ J
pW Y
Z_ W
0
U O_
o
< w
O
Q
O z S N z
O w ¢ W
Z
V
S
Q
12
�-
Q p W LL C7
Q
U K (7 <
LL w Z
p w
0
p
W
Z
p
O=n
w
Y
w
a z x
O"
¢ m U
�
Z
o
LAP L_P L-t'
U
n
U Sd2-L3MVd
-
r
Cm
C
J
ul
F
w
i
C7
W
Z'dna 09ZS
0
C)
W
I •dnd o9ZS
> y
s"..>yy,'y.:
FROM
III
{I
I%
V
w
fio9Z8 Vda
7
p
p
p
a
Q
olujinS
M
C.
'a
ap��o�g0
.. 's
a
d
s7Mtu'BV
...`Z
All
N
i
z z
Sd3NIV1NOOdOM
0
c
w 0 z
N00031TO1V
> O
Oo'3aniVOdW31
z O z
h
o
NOU0311001V
I�l
l6W'3NIHWH0Td101
w
a
o
v.
M o
.b�'
oo
N
a w
•� Cry
5
J
yoQv
� a�rx
m
E5
m
aaoc,
z
J
N
M
q
o
0
0
Wa°`°�
0
Cl)
Cl)
N
co
a—
Oi
Z
y
� d
f
a
g
O

�
I
F-
¢
Z Cl Z
O Q F W
m O
Z
mQ
J
> p w W 6
LL Z
UO w
p
Q
of
S$
N
F
O Z
V p p
�,�Syq
I\\�thwp
W
c2i
a
�
�'
� a �
SH313WVFJVd
`�
4)
I
4
�
a
W
S
I
IO
i
CA
It
u �.
n
>�
did s9Z$
B 49Z8
'
I
S��f Sul
C
J
�
z z
SH3NIV1NOOd0�
M
V O z
N0110311001V
Oo'3Hn1.d3dW31
Z U
7
w
>
ii
N0110311001V
�
"'
'�'
O L—M LJ'
l6W '3N HO]H3 ]V101
Q
S
M, oz
w
�4
p
w
:2 p1
W
;i�
W
s
c U
�
r
Jo
C
U
M
M
w
31
16
j
ci
w
w
w
J
0
O
C
C
—
i-0
co
Lfi
Gl
r
OI
z

M
I
o
W
Q
V O
O 1=
s
O O¢ 2 N z
O ¢ W
Ar
S
2
ui
oc2i
z
w
U
n
V
U
a�
'�'
S1i313WMdtld
�
i
w
O
U
I
J
I
`s. N
uj
z
iwmi
a
o.:mY
C�
W
E09Z8 Vda
zG z
SH3NItl1N00dOk
"
7
m
N0110311001tl
LL > G
Oo'3dfllb'Li3dW31
—
—
o
0
0
z u � z
��
W
N0110311031tl
o
LJ
ow'W801HOW101
M
oo
N
m
W.
O�
A
S d�
a
m U
ZLPQL
ri
-
9
uxF��
0
oz
o
U5
a�o
v
3
0
0
F �po0'x
o
w
u
w
OI
Z
m
N N
7 CD

I
Q��
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Dexter R. Matthews, Director Division of Waste Management Beverly Eaves Perdue, Governor
Dee Freeman, Secretary
SOLID WASTE SECTION
April 22, 2009
CERTIFIED MAIL 7002 0460 0001 9899 6036
Robert Wiseman,
Avery County Manager
P.O. Box 640
Newland, NC 28657
Stacey A. Smith, P.E., Project Manager
Richardson Smith Gamer & Associates
14 North Boylan Ave.
Raleigh, NC 27603
Subject: Conditional Approval of "Waste Relocation and Mitigation Plan"
Avery County C&D Landfill
Permit No. 06-03
Ingalls, Avery County
Gentlemen:
On October 24, 2008 the Division of Waste Management received your "Transition Application" entitled "Waste
Relocation and Mitigation Plan: Avery County C&D Landfill; Ingalls, North Carolina; NC Solid Waste Permit No.
06-03. Prepared for the County of Avery. October 2008."
On April 3, 2009 staff from the Solid Waste Section (Mark Poindexter, Deb Aja, Bill Wagner) met on site with
Avery County officials (Henry Norris, Bob Crenshaw) and the County's consulting engineer Stacey Smith
(Richardson, Smith, Gardner & Associates), to review the most recent boundary survey of the waste limits and
property lines.
Based on the above referenced "Transition Application" and on -site meeting, the Division has conditionally
approved the proposed waste relocation and mitigation plan dated October 2008. Below is a list of the specific
conditions that shall be met as part of the approved waste relocation and mitigation plan. The "Transition
Application" is accepted and approved as proposed, with the following conditions:
The "Transition Application" includes a request for a "lateral expansion" of the permitted waste
disposal area. With respect to any lateral expansion this "Conditional Approval" is applicable t
that will be left in place (designated as area 5 in Figure 3 of the "Waste Relocation and Mitigation
Plan" - attached).
2090 US Highway 70, Swannanoa, North Carolina 28778
Phone [phone] FAX [phone] Internet http://wastenotnc.org
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer —Printed on Dual Purpose Recycled Paper

Page 2 -a
• 5.1 Property Purchase: The proposed property purchase of the Mark S. Lechler property shall be
completed in order to create and maintain the required 200-ft. buffer between the proposed final waste
boundary and the property line.
• 5.2 Potable Well: The regulatory status of the James Frye water supply well is governed by the rules
(15A NCAC 2C) of the Aquifer Protection Branch of the Division of Water Quality, which in this case,
apply to the well owner and the well drilling contractor. However, should this well be moved prior to
the establishment of the proposed final waste boundary, the waste boundary shall be at least 500-feet
from the water supply well.
• 5.3 Vertical Expansion: Any vertical expansion must receive prior approval from the Permitting
Branch of the Solid Waste Section.
• 7.2 General Procedures: A revised Sediment and Erosion Control Plan will be required.
• 7.3 Periodic Cover: An alternative cover material is not currently approved for this facility. Earthen
cover is required as per 15A NCAC 13B .0542(f)(1). Additionally, periodic cover shall be established
and maintain in accordance with the requirements of the Sediment Pollution Control Act of 1976.
• 7.4 Intermediate Cover: Intermediate cover shall be established and maintain in accordance with the
requirements of NCAC 13B .0505 (3) (b) and the Sediment Pollution Control Act of 1976.
• 7.5 Height Monitoring: The proposed monthly height monitoring shall be adjusted to weekly height
monitoring. Avery County will take and record the weekly height measurements. Richardson Smith
Gardner & Associates will verify the height of waste each month and submit a monthly status report to
the Asheville Regional Office.
• Permanent markers shall be placed and maintained for the life of the landfill, to mark 1) the final
approved waste boundaries; 2) the current waste boundaries; and 3) the property lines.
• The water supply well that is currently located on the ridge east of the scale house shall be either
abandoned in accordance with the Well Construction Standards 15A NCAC 2C, or reclassified and
converted to a monitoring well. In order for the well to considered for reclassification and conversion,
the well construction record shall first be reviewed the Division's Hydrogeologist (Jaclynne
Drummond) and approved for use as a monitoring well.
• 16.0 Compliance Schedule: Considering the potential impact to surrounding properties, water supply
wells and surface waters, the proposed two year compliance schedule is unacceptable. A revised
compliance schedule will include benchmarks for evaluating the progress and effectiveness of the
approved corrective actions. The following benchmarks are performance based and time based.
Within three business days, following the completion of each of the following tasks, Avery County
shall verbally notify the Solid Waste Section, Asheville Regional Office (ARO) that a specific task has
been completed. The County shall notify the ARO in writing within 15 days of completing a task. In
the event that any of the following conditions can not be met within the specified time frame, Avery
County shall notify the ARO, in writing within 15 days, of the reasons why the specific condition can
not be met.

Page 3
1. Avery County shall complete the purchase of the Mark S. Lechler parcel within 30 days. This
land acquisition is a condition of allowing the waste in area 5 to remain in place.
2. Within 30-days of the purchase of the Lechler parcel, all property lines and approved final
permitted waste boundaries shall be surveyed by a Registered Land Surveyor and delineated
with permanent markers.
3. Within 30-days of the purchase of the Lechler parcel, the current limits of waste shall be
identified and anywhere these limits differ from the approved final permitted waste boundaries
they shall be marked with temporary markers.
4. Within 30-days of the purchase of the Lechler parcel, Avery County shall coordinate with Alan
Gaither (Permitting Engineer — SWS, Asheville Regional Office) concerning the requirements
for the proposed "lateral expansion" of the permitted waste disposal area where approximately
17,500 cubic yards of waste that will be left in place (area 5).
5. Within 30-days of completion of the installation of the permanent property line markers,
permanent final waste limit markers and temporary current waste limit markers, Avery County
shall submit a copy of the survey required in item #2 above to the ARO.
6. Within 60-days of the purchase of the Lechler parcel, Avery County shall submit a revised
Sediment and Erosion Control Plan to the Land Quality Section (LQS) in the ARO, for
approval.
7. Within 30-days of the approval of the revised Sediment and Erosion Control Plan, Avery
County shall begin the excavation and relocation of the wastes that are currently outside of the
permitted waste limits. These wastes are designated as areas I through 4 in the attached
Richardson Smith Gardner & Associates Figure No. 3 "Avery County Waste Relocation and
Mitigation Plan". The excavation and relocation of all wastes currently located outside of the
approved permitted waste limits shall be completed within 240-days of the approval of the
revised Sediment and Erosion Control Plan.
8. Within 60-days of their receipt of this letter, Avery County shall abandon the water supply well
that is currently located on the ridge east of the scale house in accordance with the Well
Construction Standards ISA NCAC 2C .0113. (15A NCAC 2C .0107(a)(2)(J) requires that the
minimum horizontal separation between a well, intended for a single-family residence or other
non-public water system, and Sanitary landfills shall be a minimum of 500 ft.)
Should you have any questions or comments regarding this letter you may contact me at [phone].
Sincerely,
4 Xzt
Bill Wagner
Environmental Senior Specialist
Attachment
c: Mark Poindexter, Field Operations Branch Head — DWM/SWS
Jaclynne Drummond, Hydrogeologist — DWM/SWS
Henry Norris — Avery County, P.O. Box 305, Newland, NC 28657
Deb Aja, Western District Supervisor — ARO/S W S
Alan Gaither, Permitting Engineer — ARO/SWS
Star Silvis, Assistant Regional Engineer —ARO/LQS

RICHARDSON SIvtiT 6Z Dt�ER
ASSOC ME.S�.-mom
ENGINEERING & GEOLOGICAL
SARVICRS
April 24, 2009
Mr. Bill Wagner
Environmental Senior Specialist
Solid Waste Section — NCDENR
1646 Mail Service Center,
Raleigh, NC 27699-1646
Re: Response to Transition Application Review
"Waste Relocation and Mitigation Plan — October 2008"
Avery County C&D Landfill — Permit No. 06-03
Avery County
Dear Mr. Bill Wagner,
On behalf of Avery County, Richardson Smith Gardner (RSG) has prepared this
response to the comments and Conditional Approval of the Waste Relocation and
Mitigation Plan issued on April 22, 2009 (copy attached). Additionally, we have
received your technical review letter of February 61h. The following responses address
each comment and benchmark from your April 22"d letter followed by our response.
Please find each comment or condition in italics and the associated response below.
Comment No. 1
5.1 Property Purchase: The proposed property purchase of the Mark S. Lechler
property shall be completed in order to create and maintain the required 200-ft buffer
between the proposed final waste boundary and the property line.
Response
It is Avery County's intent to purchase this property as quickly as possible.
Comment No.2
5.2 Potable Well: The regulatory status of the James Frye water supply well is
goverened by the rules (15A NCAC 2C) of the Aquifer Protection Branch of the Division
of Water Quality, which in this case, apply to the well owner and the well drilling
contractor. However, should this well be moved prior to the establishment of the
proposed final waste boundary, the waste boundary shall be at least 500-feet from the
water supply well.
Response:
RSG has been discussing the disposition of the Frye well with Jaclynne Drummmond of
the Division of Waste Management's Solid Waste Field Operations Branch. At this time,
RSG envisions two possible scenarios for the future of the Frye well:
14 N. BOYLAN AVENUE • RALEIGH, NC 27603 • TEL: [phone] • FAX [phone] • WWW.RSGENGINEERS.COM

Mr. Wagner
4/24/09
Page 2 of 7
1) A replacement well is installed (>500 feet from the final waste boundary) and the
existing well is reclassified as a monitoirng well for future DWM evaluation of the
bedrock aquifer in this location.
2) A replacement well is installed (>500 feet from the final waste boundary) and the
existing well is abandoned.
At this time, we are currently awaiting laboratory analysis of samples collected from this
well on March 31st. RSG believes it is not prudent to decide the future of this well until
laboratory data is reviewed and the Division of Waste Management's Solid Waste Field
Operation's Branch has an opportunity to determine whether this well could serve a
useful monitoring purpose in the future. Therefore, we request that all requirements,
and determinations regarding the future of this well be removed from approval of the
Waste Relocation and Mitigation Plan and be placed on hold until further evaluations
can be made.
As a matter of record, Avery County has reviewed copies of the building permit (copy
attached) for the Frye house which indicate that this home was issued a building permit
in 2004 thus further proving that this house and well was installed after the permitting
and operation of the landfill and not subject to buffer restrictions for the purpose of the
existing waste limits.
Comment No. 3
5.3 Vertical Expansion: Any vertical expansion must receive prior approval from the
Permitting Branch of the Solid Waste Section.
Response:
A permit for vertical expansion was granted to Avery County on February 20, 2009,
under permit #06-03 (Document ID No. 6742).
Comment No. 4
7.2 General Procedures: A revised Sedment and Erosion Control Plan will be required.
Response:
RSG has revised the Sediment and Erosion Control Plan for the site as a part of the
Trout Stream Buffer Variance for the expansion of the landfill. This document has been
submitted to the Division of Land Resources and is currently under review. A copy was
also submitted to DWM. A copy of this same application will be submitted to the
Asheville Land Quality Section for review pending confirmation from the central office.
RSG will discuss this matter with Ms. Star Silvis.

Mr. Wagner
4/24/09
Page 3 of 7
Comments No. 5
7.3 Periodic Cover. An alternative cover material is not currently approed for this
facility. Earthen coeris required as per 15A NCAC 1313.0542(0(1). Additionally,
periodic cover shall be established and maintain in accordance with the requirements of
the Sediment Pollution Control Act of 1976.
Response:
Avery County will only use earthen cover material and confirms that the requirements of
the Sediment Pollution Control Act of 1973 and other stormwater best management
practices (BMPs) will be followed.
Comment No. 6
7.4 Intermediate Cover: Intermediate cover shall be established and maintain in
accordance with the requirements of NCAC 1313.0505(3)(b) and the Sediment Pollution
Control Act of 1976.
Response:
Avery County will establish and maintain intermediate cover and that the requirements
of the Sediment Pollution Control Act of 1973 and other BMPs will be followed.
Comment No. 7
7.5 Height Monitoring: The proposed monthly height monitoirng shall be adjusted to
weekly height monitoring. Avery County will take and record the weekly height
measurements. Richardson Smith Gardner and Associates will verify the height of
waste each month and submit a monthly status report to the Asheville Regional Office.
Response:
Avery County agrees to perform weekly height measurements and to have RSG verify
the height monthly through a combination of engineering review and field topographic
survey. These data will be reported to the Asheville Regional Office (ARO) in monthly
status reports.
l: • ,Ti 1 - a 11SX-1
Permanent markers shall be place and maintained for the life of the landfill, to mark 1)
the final approved waste boundaries' 2) the current waste boundaries; and 3) the
property line.
Response:
Avery County confirms the listed permanent markers will be installed in accordance with
the Plan.

Mr. Wagner
4/24/09
Page 4 of 7
Comment No. 9
The water supply well that is currently located on the ridge east of the scale house shall
be either abandoned in accordance with the Well Construction Standards 15A NCAC
2C, or reclassified and converted to a monitoring well. In order for the well to be
considered for reclassification and conversion, the well construction record shall first be
reviewed by the Division's Hydrogeologist (Jaclynne Drummond) and approved for use
as a monitoring well.
Response:
We are currently awaiting laboratory analysis from samples collected from this well on
March 315t. We believe it is imprudent to make decisions regarding the future of this
well until this data can be received and reviewed. At this time we request that the
future of this well be decided after a careful review of the data and the rules that apply
to this non -potable, industrial use well. The future of this well is discussed further in
response to Benchmark No. 8 below.
Comment No. 10
16.0 Compliance Schedule: Considering the potential impact to surrounding properties,
water supply wells and surface waters, the proposed two year compliance schedule is
unacceptable. A revised compliance schedule will include benchmarks for evaluating
the progress and effectiveness of the approved corrective actions. The following
benchmarks are performance based and time based. Within three business days,
following the completion of each of the following taskes, Avery County shall verbally
notify the Solid Waste Section, Asheville Regional Office (ARO) that a specific task has
been completed. The County shall notify the ARO in writing within 15 days of
completing a task. In the event that any of the following conditions can not be met
within the specified time frame, Avery County shall notify the ARO in writing within 15
days of the reasons why the specific condition can not be met.
Response:
Avery County will notify the ARO and Solid Waste Section (verbally within 3 days and in
writing within 15 days) of completing each of the benchmarks outlined. Each of these
benchmarks are addressed below.
Benchmark No. 1
Avery County shall complete the purchase of the Mark S. Lechler parcel within 30
days. This land acquisition is a condition of allowing the waste in area 5 to remain in
place.
Response
Due to the complexity of land purchases by the County, Avery County requests that

Mr. Wagner
4124/09
Page 5 of 7
waste removal activities may begin prior to the completion of the purchase the
Lechler parcel. As this parcel purchase is only required for Area 5 waste (as outlined
in the Waste Mitigation and Relocation Plan) to remain in place, Avery County
believes waste relocation from other areas may begin before this property transaction
is complete. Avery County understands that if this property purchase is not closed, it
will be necessary to remove the waste outlined in this area.
Avery County will begin the purchase process within the next 30 days, however, we
request that the requirement to complete the purchase of the parcel within 30 days
be removed.
Benchmarks No. 2 and 3
Within 30-days of the purchase of the Lechler parcel, all property lines and approved
final permitted waste boundaries shall be surveyed by a Registered Land Surveyor
and delineated with permanent markers.
Within 30-days of the purchase of the Lechlerparcel, the current limits of waste shall
be identified and anywhere these limits differ from the approved final permitted waste
boundaries they shall be marked with temporary markers.
Response
As itis likely to take longer than 30 days to complete the Lechler parcel purchase,
RSG proposes that within 30 days of the approval of the Waste Mitigation and
Relocation Plan, Avery County will perform the outlined surveying as described
above (with the exception of the survey and marking of the Lechler parcel which will
occur upon completion of the property transaction). As stated above, should the
property purchase not be executed, Avery County understands that the waste
outlined as Area 5 will require relocation.
Benchmark No. 4
Within 30-days of the purchase of the Lechler parcel, Avery County shall coordinate
with Allan Gaither (Permitting Engineer— SWS, Asheville Regional Office) concerning
the requirements for the proposed "lateral expansion"of the permitted waste disposal
area where approximately 17,500 cubic yards of waste that will be left in place (area
5).
Response
Avery County confirms this requirement.
Benchmark No. 5
Within 30-days of the installation of the permanent property line markers, permanent
final waste limit markers, and temporary current waste limit markers, Avery County
shall submit a copy of the survey required in item #2 above to the ARO.

Mr. Wagner
4/24/09
Page 6 of 7
Response
Avery County confirms this requirement.
Benchmark No. 6
Within 60-days of the purchase of the Lechler parcel, Avery County shall submit a
revised Sediment and Erosion Control Plan to the Land Quality Section (LQS) in the
ARO, for approval.
Response
RSG has previously submitted a revised Sediment and Erosion Control Plan as a
part of the Trout Stream Buffer Variance Request dated September 2008. The Trout
Stream Buffer Variance Request is currently under review by Mr. Gray Hauser of the
Division of Land Resources (DLR). The Division of Waste Management (DWM) has
been copied on this request. RSG will submit a copy of this application to the Land
Quality Section for review as described in Response No. 4.
Benchmark No. 7
Within 30-days of the approval of the revised Sediment and Erosion Control Plan,
Avery County shall begin the excavation and relocation of the wastes that are
currently outside of the permitted waste limits. These wastes are designated as
areas 1 through 4 in the attached Richardson Smith Gardner and Associates Figure
No. 3 `Avery County Waste Relocation and Mitigation Plan". The excavation and
relocation of all wastes currently located outside of the approved permitted waste
limits shall be completed within 240-days of the approval of the revised Sediment and
Erosion Control Plan.
Response
Avery County will begin the excavation of wastes outside the approved permitted
boundary within 30 days of approval of the revised Sediment and Erosion Control
Plan. At this time, Avery County expects to be able to meet the 240 day requirement
for completion, however, weather/construction delays may require additional time for
completion. Avery County will keep the ARO and SWS advised as to the progress of
the waste relocation on a monthly basis so any delays due to weather etc. will be
discussed as early as any impact to the schedule is noted.
Benchmark No. 8
Within 60-days of their receipt of this letter, Avery County shall abandon the waste
supply well that is currently located on the ridge east of the scale house in
accordance with the Well Construction Standards 15A NCAC 2C.0113. (15A NCAC
2C.0107(a)(2)(J) requires that the minimum horizontal separation between a well,
intended for a single-family residence orother non-public watersystem and Sanitary
Landfills shall be a minimum of 500 ft.)

Mr. Wagner
4/24/09
Page 7 of 7
Response
As stated above, the required 500 foot separation from sanitary landfills is for single-
family residences or non-public water systems. The well located on the ridge east of
the scale house is a non -potable well used for industrial purposes (truck washing,
transfer station floor cleaning, etc.). Therefore, it does not qualify as a well for a
single-family household, nor does it qualify as a non-public water system. A "non-
public water system" designation is specifically for wells that supply water for human
consumption. The well will be marked "non -potable" "no drinking".
At this time we request that this condition be removed from the approval. Avery
County and RSG are prepared to work with NCDENR to evaluate the future of this
well upon receipt of analytical data from samples collected on March 315f
Should you have any questions or require clarification, please contact me at your
earliest convenience at [phone] or by email listed below.
Sincerely,
Richardson Smith Gardner & Associates, Inc.
Joan A. Smyth, P.G.
Senior Hydrogeologist
ioan(d.rsgengineers.com
Attachments
�a
qAith, P.E
Project Manager
sta cev(a) rsg e n g i n e e rs. com
Cc: Robert Wiseman, Avery County Manager
Mark Poindexter, Field Operations Branch Head — DWM/SWS
Jacklynne Drummond, Hydrogeologist — DWM/SWS
Henry Norris, Avery County
Deb Aja, Western District Supervisor — ARO/SWS
Allen Gaither, Permitting Engineer —ARO/SWS
Julie Vann, Env. Senior Technician - ARO
G. Landon Davidson, APS Regional Supervisor - ARO
Star Silvis - ARO/LQS
File

} ■ Pnnt-your riame and address on the reverse
X -' �tl �❑ Addressee
so that we can return the card to ou.
Y
"' x% ``
B Receivedk (Pptrted Name)�1e3}f�elivery�
■ Attach this card to the back of the mallpiece,
M.
or on the front if space permits.
D. Is delivery address different from item 11 ❑ Ybs
' i. Article Addressed to:.�= ----
>' i { If YES, enter delivery address below: ❑ No _
�:•
Robert Wiseman
'
Avery County Manager
y°c
PO Box 640'
ip. Newland, NC 28657-0640
-
I
4
�
3. Se Type
f
Mall ❑ Express Mail
,ertifled
Registered etum Receipt for Merchandise
O Insured Mell C.O.D.
` 4. Restricted Delivery? Ptis Feel ' ❑ Yes
2. Article Number p02 46'0 0golrl9899
0
7603b ��
(iransferi/rom service IsW
—
PS Form 3811 February 2004 tt '; { rDom estic Return Receipt ` i025e5.02-M-11540
®
I
Br B
.t]
o 0 F
—a
Er - Postage $
IrCID
Ir Certified Fee
r-1 Return Receipt Fee ......__._.._-.'_
(Endorsement Required)
Postmark—
Here '
C3
r3 Delivery
Restricted Delivery Fee
n
O (Entloreted
Endo
r3 Total Postage & Fees $
_D
.
S Sent To
p
/ Robert Wiseman ----
................ ................I
fU Streeq Apt. No.;
.Avery Coun-----------
PO Box 640 Manager -
C3 or PO Sox No. �.
_Newland,
State, ZIP+4
NC 28657•
17,Clty,
:rr
rr

USPS - Track & Confirm
http://trkenfrml .snii.usps.com/PTSIntemetWeb/InterLabe I Inquiry.do
Track & Confirm
Search Results
'I Label/Receipt Number: 7002 0460 0001 9899 6036
Status: Delivered
Your itemwas delivered at 12:13 pmon April 28, 2009 in NEWLAND, NC
28657. A proof of delivery record may be available through your local
Post Office for a fee.
Additional information for this item is stored in files of0ine.
Reafiara QfRina Lrwaihi , riw,l ' Rates to USPs coin Horne a
Home I Help I Nnn In
Track & Confirm FAQs
Track & Conliri
Enter Label/Receipt Number.
Ste Map Cuelgmef Service Forms
Gov't Services Careers
PrjvAw,PQltcy
Terms of Use,
BP. sinBss..Qws14iRer Gateway
Copyright© 2010 USPS. All Rights Reserved.
No FEAR Act EEO Data FOR
..
.
1 of 1 2/24/2010 1:57 PM

Copy
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Dexter R. Matthews, Director Division of Waste Management Beverly Eaves Perdue, Governor
Dee Freeman, Secretary
SOLID WASTE SECTION
May15, 2009
CERTIFIED MAIL 7002 0460 0001 9899 6050
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Robert Wiseman,
Avery County Manager
P.O. Box 640
Newland, NC 28657
Joan A. Smyth, P.G.
Senior Hydrogeologist
Richardson Smith Gardner & Associates
14 North Boylan Ave.
Raleigh, NC 27603
Subject: Conditional Approval of "Waste Relocation and Mitigation Plan"
Avery County C&D Landfill
Permit No. 06-03
Ingalls, Avery County
Mr. Wiseman and Ms. Smyth:
The Solid Waste Section of the Division of Waste Management has received and reviewed the letter
submitted on behalf of the County dated April 24, 2009 letter titled "Response to Transition Application
Review" By Richardson, Smith, Gardner & Associates (RSG). All of the actions proposed in that letter
are accepted and approved by the Solid Waste Section with the following exceptions:
Benchmark No. 1
Avery County shall complete the purchase of the Mark S. Lechler parcel within 30-days.
This land acquisition is a condition of allowing the waste in area S to remain in place.
Avery County Response (via RSG)
Due to the complexity of land purchases by the County, Avery County requests that waste
removal activities may begin prior to the completion of the purchase the Lechler parcel. As
this parcel purchase is only required for Area 5 waste (as outlined in the Waste Mitigation
and Relocation Plan) to remain in place, Avery County believes waste relocation from
other areas may begin before this property transaction is complete. Avery County
understands that if this property purchase is not closed, it will be necessary to remove the
waste outlined in this area. Avery County will begin the purchase process within the next
2090 US Highway 70, Swannanoa, North Carolina 28778
Phone [phone] FAX [phone] Internet http://wastenotnc.org
An Equal Oppodunity I Affirmative Action Employer— Printed on Dual Purpose Recycled Paper

Pag, 2
f �
30 days, however, we request that the requirement to complete the purchase of the parcel
within 30 days be removed.
Solid Waste Section Response:
No relocation of waste, or any other additional land disturbance, can be undertaken prior to the
approval of an Erosion and Sediment Control (E&SC) plan by the Land Quality Section of the
Division of Land Resources. One the E&SC plan has been submitted and approved, the proposed
waste relocation may begin.
Benchmark No. 8
Within 60-days of their receipt of this letter, Avery County shall abandon the landfill supply well that is
currently located on the ridge east of the scale house in accordance with the Well Construction
Standards 15A NCAC 2C0113. (15A NCAC 2C.0107(a)(2)(J) states that the minimum horizontal
separation between a well, intended for a single-family residence or other non-public water system, and
potential sources of groundwater contamination, which exists at the time the well is constructed, shall
be as follows unless otherwise specified: (J) Sanitary landfills 500ft.
Avery County Response (via RSG)
As stated above, the required 500 foot separation from sanitary landfills is for single family
residences or non-public water systems. The well located on the ridge east of the scale
house is a non -potable well used for industrial purposes (truck washing, transfer station
floor cleaning, etc.). Therefore, it does not qualify as a well for a single-family household,
nor does it qualify as a non-public water system. A "nonpublic water system" designation
is specifically for wells that supply water for human consumption. The well will be marked
"non -potable" "no drinking".
At this time we request that this condition be removed from the approval. Avery County
and RSG are prepared to work with NCDENR to evaluate the future of this well upon
receipt of analytical data from samples collected on March 31st.
Solid Waste Section Response:
The Avery County C&D non -potable well and the Frye potable well were sampled for Appendix I
constituents on March 31, 2009, and the analytical results were received on May 1, 2008. In
addition, two Notices of Violation (NOVs) were issued by the Division of Water Quality - Aquifer
Protection Section to the well drilling company, Braswell Well Drilling, on April 8, 2009 for the
violation of 15A NCAC 2C .0107(a)(2) for the Avery County C&D Landfill non -potable well and the
Frye potable well. Since both wells are located less than 500 feet from the landfill and are in
violation of the 2C rules, a determination from the Aquifer Protection Section regarding the
abandonment, replacement, and sampling of the wells will be required.
Please conduct soil sampling in order to confirm and verify that there is no residual contamination
from the removal of the wastes located outside the permitted waste boundaries. The soil samples
should be field screened to determine the presence of organics, and the soils should be analyzed for
Appendix I constituents (of 40 CFR 258). Please contact Ms. Jaelynne Drummond, Solid Waste

Page 3
Section Hydrogeologist, prior to sampling to determine the number, depths, and locations of these
soil samples.
Should you have any questions or comments regarding this letter you may contact me at (828) 296-
4705.
Sincerely,
4 xzt --
Bill Wagner
Environmental Senior Specialist
cc: Mark Poindexter, Field Operations Branch Head — DWM/SWS
Jaclynne Drummond, Hydrogeologist — DWM/SWS
Henry Norris — Avery County, P.O. Box 305, Newland, NC 28657
Deb Aja, Western District Supervisor —ARO/SWS
Alan Gaither, Permitting Engineer —ARO/SWS
Star Silvis, Assistant Regional Engineer — ARO/LQS
Julie Vann - ARO/DWQ/AP

USPS - Track & Confirm
UNITEDSTATES
POSTAL SERVICEo
e
r ♦ i i yy "f.
R
http://trkcnfrml.sn i.usps,com/PTSInternetWeb/InterLabe]Inquiry.do
Label/Receipt Number: 7002 0460 0001 9899 6050
Status: Delivered
Your itemwas delivered at 1:28 pm on May 20, 2009 in NEWLAND, NC
28657. A proof of delivery record may be available through your local
Post Office for a fee.
Additional information for this item is stored in files of0ine
Resmre CNiJane IIatnrts+ _Ratrrrn to U5f+S crrut ftnrrre>
Norris I Hemel I Sian In
Track & Confirm FAQS
Track & Confirm
Enter Label/Receipt Number.
$ te,Map Customer Service Forms Gov t se ylogs Careers Pnvgcy polloy T.grms.ot..Use. QV$ipess Customer Gateway
..
Copyright©2g10 USPS. All Rig his Reserved. No FEAR Act EEO Data FOIA 101..
1 of 1 2/24/2010 1:54 PM

RICHARDSON SMITH GARDNER & ASSOCIATES
May 18, 2009
Ms. Starr Silvis
Assistant Regional Engineer
NCDENR - Land Quality Section
2090 U.S. Highway 70
Swannanoa, North Carolina 28778
RE: Stormwater Management Plan Modification
Avery County C & D Landfill Expansion
NC Solid Waste Permit No. 06-03
Dear Ms. Silvis:
On behalf of Avery County, Richardson Smith Gardner & Associates (RSG) is hereby submitting
two (2) copies of the enclosed modification' to the stormwater management plan for the
expansion of the construction and demolition debris (C&D) landfill disposal area in Ingalls,
North Carolina.
As you may recall', the site is undergoing a response to a compliance order issued by the
Division of Waste Management in conjunction with the expansion project for the landfill.
Furthermore, this expansion will include some impacts to an on -site stream between Phases I and
II (to create Phase III) which required permits from the Division of Water Quality, the Army
Corps of Engineers, and a Trout Stream Buffer Variance from the Division of Land Resources.
All of these approvals have since been received and we are proceeding with this regional land
disturbance permit. It is our opinion, that due to the numerous activities and permits required in
this area of the site, this application includes all correspondence with the other agencies for your
information. However, we direct your attention to Attachment 8 of the submittal (as it is more
typical of a normal request) which includes narrative, calculations, and the financial
responsibility form. Additionally, we have attached a copy of the expanded disturbance fee for
$975 (15 acres expansion). For your reference, we have also provided a copy of the original plan
approval from 1995.
We appreciate your attention and we are prepared to respond immediately to any questions or
concerns regarding this application.
Correspondence dated September 18, 1995 regarding approval of land disturbance plan by Mr.
Dennis Owenby, NCDENR.
Correspondence dated May 5, 2009 regarding response to notice of violation to Ms. Janet Boyer,
P.E., NCDENR from Mr. Buddy Norris, Avery County.
14 N. BOYLAN AVENUE • RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27603 • TEL. [phone] • W W W.RSGENGINEERS.COM

Ms. Starr Silvis
May 18, 2009
Page 2 of 2
Please feel free to contact me by phone at [phone] ext. 127 or by email at
s to c ey(iirs,gengineers. com.
Sincerely,
Gardner & Associates, Inc.
E.
Project Manager
Art.
Cc: Mr. Henry `Buddy" Norris, Avery County Solid Waste Department
Mr. Allen Gaither, NCDENR
Mr. Bill Wagner, NCDENR
File
H:\Projects\Avery County (NCpF&SC Ran\Cover Letter 5-5-09.wpd

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Asheville Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Nann B. Guthrie, Regional Manager
LETTER OF APPROVAL
September 18, 1995
Mr. Randall Fletcher
Avery County Manager
Courthouse
Newland, NC 28657
Dear Mr. Fletcher:
RECEIVED "r.
SEP 201995
SF911CFS COM, P0
This office has reviewed the erosion and sedimentation control plan submitted for the project listed
below. We find the plan to be acceptable and hereby issue this Letter of Approval. Please be advised that
Title 15A, North Carolina Administrative Code 4B.0017(a), requires that a copy of the approved soil erosion
control plan be on file at the job site. Also, you should consider this letter to give the Notice required by NCGS
§113A-61(d) of our right of periodic inspection to ensure compliance with the approved plan.
The State's Sedimentation Pollution Control Program is a performance -oriented program requiring
protection of the natural resources and adjoining properties. If, following commencement of this project, it is
determined that the plan is inadequate to meet the requirements of NCGS §113A-51 to 66, this office may
require revisions to the plan and implementation of the revisions to ensure compliance with the Act -
Please note that this approval is based in part on the accuracy of the information provided in the
Financial Responsibility Form which you have provided. You are requested to file an amended form if there
is any change in the information included on the form. In addition, it would be helpful if you notify this office
of the proposed starting date for this project. Your cooperation is appreciated.
DGO:a
Enclos re
cc: r. Charlie Seymour
Project name:
Location:
Date received:
New submittal ( )
Sincerely,
Dennis G. Owenby
tlOrAsst Regional Engineer
Solid Waste Management Facility
Avery County
9/11/95
Revision (✓ )
Interchonge Building, 59 Woodiin F1oce. Asheville. N.C. 28801
An Equol OpronunHy At m-lolive Action Employer
Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
501 recyded/ IOA post consumer paper

PyL NoG 'CO 19 139
CHECK 73515
Inv. No. Inv. Date
----------- ---------
PERMIT OS/11/09
Desc.: LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT
Fund Account
10 5800.5400
CONT. SVC-ENGINEERING
Sales Tax Inv. Amount
--------- ------------
.00 975.00
975.00
RECD MAY 18 2009
ii'07351Sul i:053LOL62Po: 20713313L00272811'

wsuxyo-..e.. 3wotlAtl3Atl 710Atl376077uof

RICHARDSON SMITH GARDNER & ASSOCIATES
IZMMM�'Geologlcal Services
July 20, 2009
Mr. Bill Wagner
Environmental Senior Specialist
Division of Waste Management — NCDENR
2090 US Highway 70
Swannanoa, North Carolina 28778
RE: Waste Relocation and Mitigation Plan — PROGRESS REPORT NO. 1
Avery County C&D Landfill
(NC Solid Waste Permit # 06-03)
Ingalls, North Carolina
Dear Bill:
Richardson Smith Gardner & Associates, Inc. (RSG) in cooperation with the Avery County
Solid Waste Department has prepared this joint progress update as to the waste relocation
activities at the above referenced site. As you are aware, certain schedule benchmarks were set
under your condition approvals issued in correspondence dated April 22, 2009 and on May 15,
2009. Therefore, this letter addresses each benchmark and includes a description of the current
activities being performed to satisfy each requirement as follows:
Benchmark No. 1 (Lechler Property Purchase)
Avery County shall complete the purchase of the Mark S. Lechler parcel.
Progress Statement
Avery County has extended an offer to Mr. Lechler and an acceptance has been received.
At this time, the purchase is within County legal review.
Benchmark No. 2 (Property Lines and Permit Boundary Surveys)
All property lines and approved final permitted waste boundaries shall be surveyed by a
Registered Land Surveyor and delineated with permanent markers.
Progress Statement
Surveying Solutions (under contract to RSG) has performed extensive surveying across
both Phases 1 and 2 of the existing facility and have provided numerous markers
identifying both property lines and both permitted and existing waste boundaries as
witnessed by the Division in our April site visit. Additionally, Avery County is prepared
to contract the waste relocation activities and has completed the procurement process.
Once a contractor is selected, additional surveying will be completed following initial
14 N. BOYLAN AVENUE , RALEIGH. NORTH CAROLINA 27603 0 TEL. [phone] W W W.RSGENGINEERS.COM

Mr. Bill Wagner
July 20, 2009
Page 2 of 4
clearing activies.
Benchmark No. 3 (Waste Limit Surveys)
The current limits of waste shall be identified and anywhere these limits differfrom the approved
final permitted waste boundaries they shall be marked with temporary markers.
Progress Statement
Surveying Solutions (under contract to RSG) has performed extensive surveying across
both Phases 1 and 2 of the existing facility and have provided numerous markers
identifying both property lines and both permitted and existing waste boundaries as
witnessed by the Division in our April site visit.
Benchmark No. 4 (Lateral Expansion Approval)
Within 30-days of the purchase of the Lechler parcel, Avery County shall coordinate with Allen
Gaither concerning the requirements for the proposed "lateral expansion" of the permitted
waste disposal area where approximately 17,500 cubic yards of waste that will be left in place
(Area 5).
Progress Statement
Both Avery County and RSG have contacted Mr. Gaither and once the property
transaction is complete, we will request a conference to discuss final steps for inclusion
of the property into the current Site Study update.
Benchmark No. 5 (Waste Limit Markers & Map)
Within 30-days of completion of the installation of the permanent property line markers,
permanent final waste limit markers and temporary current waste limit markes, Avery County
shall submit a copy of the survey required in item #2 above to the ARO.
Progress Statement
This item is pending.
Benchmark No. 6 (Submit Erosion and Sediment Control Plan)
Avery County shall submit a revised Sediment and Erosion Control Plan to the Land Quality
Section (LQS) in the ARO, for approval.

Mr. Bill Wagner
July 20, 2009
Page 3 of 4
Progress Statement
RSG submitted the updated Stormwater Management Plan to the Asheville Regional
Office on May 18, 2009 and subsequently received plan approval on June 9, 2009.
Benchmark No. 7 (Waste Relocation Activities)
Within 30-days of the approval of the revised Sediment and Erosion Control Plan, Avery County
shall begin the excavation and relocation of the waste that are currently outside of the permitted
waste limits. The excavation and relocation of all wastes currently located outside of the
approved permitted waste limits shall be completed within 240 days of the approval of the
revised Erosion and Sediment Control Plan.
Progress Statement
Following conditional approval of the Waste Relocation and Mitigation Plan, Avery
County engaged RSG to prepare construction drawings and specifications for
procurement of a contractor. This project includes both waste relocation and necessary
site stormwater improvements included in the updated Stormwater Management Plan.
Bids for the project were received on July 17' and it is anticipated that a Notice to
Proceed will be issued to the contractor by the end of the month.
Benchmark No. 8 (Abandonment of On -Site Well)
Avery County shall abandon the water supply well that is currently located on the ridge east of
the scale house in compliance with directives by the Aquifer Protection Section.
Progress Statement
Braswell Drilling Services completed abandonment of the on -site well on June 30th and
installed anew on -site well just west of the existing transfer station. Abandonment and
Well Installation logs are attached.
Benchmark No. 9 (Soil Sampling)
Please conduct soil sampling in order to confirm and verify that there is no residual
contamination from the removal of the wastes located outside the permitted waste boundaries.
The soil samples should be field screened to determine the presence of organics, and the soils
should be analyzed for Appendix I constituents (of 40 CFR 258).
Progress Statement
This is pending.

Mr. Bill Wagner
July 20, 2009
Page 4 of 4
We appreciate your attention and we are prepared to respond immediately to any questions or
concerns regarding this application. Please feel free to contact us by phone at [phone] or
by email below.
Sincerely,
Richardson Smith Gardner & Associates, Inc.
++i j
Ir
y . S ith, P.E.
Project Manager, ext. 127
stacey(cr%rsgengincers. com
Att.
Cc: Mr. Henry "Buddy" Norris, Avery County Solid Waste Department
Mr. Allen Gaither, NCDENR
File
HAPmjectsWvery County (NC)Wvery-09-3 (Waste Relocation and Site Improvements)\Progress Report i 7-2M9.wpd

TR, f
F r i WELL ABANiDONb NT REGORD
Nortt Q'argl;Da Depatvnent oFEnuirailment aB,d'Natura112esouzces Division of Water Quality
G-ONTRA.CTORCERTIFICATIgN'#25$9A
L WELL CONTRACTOR: L.
6, {YELL DETAIIS:
R Scott Garland
a. Total Depth: 420 t. Dimneter.6.125 in
b Waterl:evel(Below Measuring Point): 63 ft l
Well contractor (individual) Name.
Braswell Well Drilling, Inc
Measuring1
point is P. above land surface.
�
WeII:Conttactor Company Name
STREETADDRESs 24121VilllerS Gap Hwy
6. CASING: Ixngur Diameter
NeWland NC 28,567
a.Casing Depth (if kno\m): 105 h. 6.25 in,
City or Town State .Zip Code
b. Casing Removed: ft. in.
82 733-2602
Area: code - Phone. number
7. DISINFECTION: 140Z
2. WELL INFORMATION:
(Amount of65%r75% calcium hypochloiiteused)
SITE WELL ID:#(if applicable)
S. SEALING. MATERIAL:
Li
STATE WELL PERMIT # (if applicable)
Neat Cement Sand Cement
COUNTYWELL PERMIT # (if applicable)
Cement 2328 lb. Cement Ib_ Water 12PF—
Rol, Water gal.
DW Q Or OTHER PERMIT # (if applicable)
Bentonite
WELL USE iCbeck applicable use): El Monitoring ❑Residential
Dominate lb.
Ll Municipal/Public Z Industrial/Commercial El Agricultural
Type: ]Slurry ❑Pellets
❑Recovery ❑Injection ❑.Irrigation
Water gal:
_
Other (list use)
Other
Type matenal gravel
3. WELL LOCATION:
Amount 2CUyd
COUNTY Avery QUADRANGLE NAME
NEAREST I OwN: Spruce Pine, NC
__ ..:.....
9. EXPLAIN. METHOD OF EMPLACEMENT OF MATERIAL:
ifllsad�ithu�ashe�gtraYeLto 115�pgjpY� tpRaf— ._
(Snect/Rosd Neov.NumbcACmmmsnity, Subdivision, WNo., Parcel, Lp Code)
CasinQ..PUmDedneat cemeitorcutthrpugh trernl
pipe -
TOPOGRAPIfICd LANDSETTNG:
❑ Slope .❑ Valley ❑ Plat Z Ridge E3Other
(Check appropriate setting)
--]30.
WELL DIAGRAM: Draw a detailed sketch of the well on the back of this
LATITUDE 35 57.624 May bo bid d¢gmas,
— -- minutes, seconds, or in a
form showing total depth, depth and diameter of screens (if any) remaining
LONGITUDE ' -3 1 68.311 -decimal format
m the well,. gravel interval, intervals of casing perforations, and depths and
—
types of fill matenalsased.
Latitude/longitude source: ZGPS ❑ Topograpbic map
(Lomfion of well mast be zhmyn on USGS tape dmp and
11. DATE WELL. ABANDONED 6/30/09
"a-ched to this jarm if not using UPS,)
4a. FACILITY- 711111 of the business where the well is located. Complete 4a a Mb
I DO HEREBY CERTIFY THATTHIS WELL WAS ABANDONED IN ACCORDANCL
WILK 1SA \CAC 2C. WELL CONST UC710N STANDARDS, AND THAT A COPY OF
(If a residential well, skip 4a cmnplete 4b, well owner ad.... ren 0,,],)
TFRS�DH EN OVI DT THEWEiLLOWlGR.
FACILITY LO#(if applicable)
NAME OFFACIL)TYAVery Co, Solid Waste Trans. Sta,
" 07/1/2009
STREETADDRESS 2175 Brus_hyCreekRd
r SIGNATURE OF CERTIFIED WELL -CONTRACTOR DATE
Newland, NC 28657
SIGNATURE Of PRIVATE WELL OWNER ABANDONING THLWELL DATE
CAyorIOwn State Zip Code
(The pnvilewellownernan beaemdividual who itason.likandon, lds'herrosidcotial.vel
db. CONTACT PERSON)WELL OWNER:
m accurdi uw wnh l5:A NCAC X.0113.)
NAME Buddy Norris
RsScoff Garland
STREET ADDRESS 828/ 737-5420
PRINTED NAME OF PERSON ABANDONING THE WELL
- Submit copy to the owner and the original to the Division of: Water Quality within 30 days. Form GW-30
Attn: Irtfirmation Management, 1617'Mail Service Center - Raleigh; INC 27699-1617,- Phone No.[phone] ext 568. Rev. 5706

'1 + NONRESIDENTIAL ONRE>SIDENTIA.L WELL CONSTRUCTION RL^ CORD
3
f:
North Carohda Department OfEnvironment and Natural Resources -Division ofWaIS Quality
WELL CONTRACTOR:CERTIEICATION # .Z ) 3 v
1. WELL CONTRACTOR:
-A i. ,. .C? , r
STREET ADDRESS. � L`I ti �2" IM C �C' '((��6l!41.". t4 LL,-i
k�llcz tatre� ) � C16."..3 1
City or Town State I Code
Area cade- Phone n umber
2. WELL INFORMATION:
SITE WELL ID'$(ifapplicable)
STATE WELL.PERMIT#(if applicable)
DWQ or OTHER PERMIT *(it applicable)- . iS .21 OOe3
WELL USE (Check Applicable Box) Monitoring. ❑ 'Municipal/Public ❑
IndustnaVCommerdal P. Agricultural Recovery O Injection
Irrigatioit0 Other (list use)
DATE DRILLED S Cr'aU.'C.�i
TIME COMPLETED i ,o PM N
3. WELL LOCATION:
CITY: 5P.'.:X'p /; COUNTY]
(Street Name, Numbers, Community, Subdi ion, Lct N�rt�s o., Parcel, Zip Code)
TOPOGRAPHIC .fLAND .SETTING:
'Slope ❑Valley �`Flat []Ridge ❑ Other
(ched6zppropmhe box):
LATITUDE 3. ,L 5-7 �d� May be in
degrees,
minutes, seconds or
LONGITUDE y, T� m a d:cimal format
Latitude/longitude source: -OGPS ❑Topographic map
(location of well most be shown on a USGS topo map and
attached to this form if not using GPS)
4. FACILITY -I. thane,iie of eetivsnees whereihe well is located.
FACILITY ID#(if applicable)
NAME OF Ft,r ILrrY n—t
STREET ADDRESS %) {•5'BPt; �1V c'I
•-� . _ r
City or Town -StateZip Cope
CONTACT PERSON
MAILING ADDRESS ...
City a Town :State Zip Code.
Area code - Rhona number
d. TOP OF CASING IS t FT. Above Land Surface"
°Top of casom terminated atfor below land: surface may require
a variance in accordance With '15A.NCAC 2C .0118.
e. YIELD (gpm):.5 b METHOD OF TEST-. 1z1+ �
I. DISINFECTION; TypeAmount;
g. WATER .ZONES <(depth):.
Frcm_jAja To i i.Qi FromTo
From_ Tq_ From To —
From Tc From —To
6. CASING: Thickness!
Depthi6�F .Diameter Weight Material
From To L� f 7sE
From To Ft.
From_ To Ft.
7, GROUT: Depth Material Method
From To -�r Ft. "
From '5L_Tc_4('% Ft, N"fYCf
From To FL
S. SCREEN:- Depth Diameter Slot Size Material
From Tc PL_in. in. _
From_Tc Ft. in. in.
From To Ft._in. _ in. _
9. SANDIGRAVEL PACK:
Depth Size Material
From To Ft.
From To Ft.
From To` Ft.
10. DRILLING LOG
From To F rmaticr} Description
L 6o T"
11. REMARKS:
O HEREBY CERTIrYTNAT LL WAS CUrvSi rcU41 rvHGGONUArvUt IV' 1H
S. WELL DETAILS: Is CYC WELL CON. UCnON NDARDS AND TH AOOPY OF TM5
a. TOTAL DEPTH: RECOR AS BEEN PR DED ELLOWNER.
b. DOES WELL REPLACE EXISTING WELL? "ES X NO❑r
SIGNATUREOFC RI-. WELL CONTRA OR DHTE
c. WATER LEVEL BelowTpp of Casing: FT.L1xlf2�V
.(Use "*° if Above Tiop of Casing) PRINTED NAME OF PERS N CONSTRUCTING THE WELL
Submit the original tolhe Division of Water Quality within 30 days. Attn: Information Mgt, Form GW-Ib
1617 Mail Service Center -Raleigh, NC.27699 1617 Phone No. (919) 733-701'5 ext:568. Rev. 7105

APPROXIMATE BAUSITY CAE& ?velnum ad n� wm.vw W ja
�` S dime L 3 h b h pe S G
Placei b t L h g d1 g nd plpi g 1 �'' /�
ompl Thed fe b 1 C d. Ac :.at. ava exctaev coal
locatic. 0°Ae r691nLLv
All ax Ei 1 this be b e \ omplate I. fair axes Panel grade. or.
®wmF�vxmm fe1 o
`. ompl t d d thew L 1 ated SL b 9 prepared \ „mvuue�^'°� l/
a opi 1 c anal ci t d eleinq i
ently b g i et 11 dae-
6oL1 S[ockpil Ai / 6 rm' P : �y mnnm ��)g
all atotmx t t a 0 - f _ e �+�„�\� 1 SEbIMP,NT BASIN NO q .mloaw m.nun w.xl ��(
from thin [ea co =�'"
IMMA (M.)
CWUNO PIPE (M.) W
RIP RAP OUIIET
PAOTEC➢ON (M.)
ISSUED FOR
CONSTRUCTION
!` � (SEE AEFERENCE 6) : , - • e e ,�� ,'�� �� � � T � fJ�,>e �� „C �\ t IEtdh
m —,
` N 1 4M" z SIR :waars. ma mew 10 z
zyz
Mdi�i
o`�a.�.lu:.
a's A -yl�. ,F m � mca. 0 ¢ Z
PEAMIEY b ! C .ouoslm muwmxn Z
a'S�- i.. aapNH vd atA .:::!: p w
va
SILT rE� . jw=,F",.' r ,! .1 s.? :::•:[ We � � - m
k prti w3 0
ASTE pfi`RM:f w3x'hF o
'P� W DE OF 9 �3 M .o.
d a�a
1 �e'f ! A.
u w xa.x
ae—w
\ FFFRbkIM S�ItING / !! L :� z
O B6% L CAwromww:. rerun F �P: n
U
vo srv%nn ace—e�m ml —ft o
4 '1i YB TRANSFER ~{f' Nfr
eba 1 ae. All of pbaoe 1 pt M1111E UJWs 3
for t�heoeoutbxeetern bounaa[y, h b 'F HANDIIN PApIl1T mu mnK uax u.rcn.aaoniu, ��'a _
ra rA NOl[
wyp� ompl t d and i. [eddy for [ veg t ti •)•TSl�f ! �Aj
XaLtlee are beanpern....... ROX—
on Rha 3 ortb ni the aocoss oad. Si x'j w rm�u � _
Theoo attle,wall be completed h n 5
Y` �.0 r.mrmm d
-eba 1 m been dad am llmea ^� 7" MR
°f n 1rP.ameo�a "'I m'
>K mu
iretteLc� Nelex /.r WLYIP i ACTM ADIM MR NO (IIsxA�. ® ...,
_

Sadiment Basin 3: The ba h pe is in
—...E— place, though all of the grading is not
,
7� complete. The area for the cascade has
been cleared. The next planted activities
are finishing the basin, installing the
cascade, eacavatin9 waste and installing
the drop inlet and concrete pipe.
" .. � .-• (TYPJE
Soil Stockpile A ea+ AFRES
_
All stormwater routed
from this area toero
measionure control }
+ meaorae. /
✓ (MPORARYi( /
DIVERiON BERM Ecl 1\ /
p
T !
APP10
ROq
PROPOSED STREA
IMPACT AREA IN 0
(SEE REFERENCE 6)
t
m�
1"a x,vT FLU BERME
A wes¢.&L4�na gn.[x+x
APPROXIMATEBRUSITY IX m2"..uca a mvmxc Hrt. eve us mrmrar awm+
/ '/ y, s . - ($EE REFEREN 5) `� smiauws.>aw+w ep ux
L/ bi1. fi3A if %5tf E2 'Li "mrona+ro awao rtmmsw else
$ 'u �\ u¢nMn. R(.ertr. BPia rtt swt w+
Jif ff an'
ri.Z vo uWHwu®alX 9t vu aP
1 {t22� L r��Wr mrcera aroma sex nux ewe
auaway.m awam9'... am+ala
x mroa cm+w.a x x �+� x \ �� l ;,�♦N � 3` -._ Ima mw.m+a.mAm ells xnva saxAaa
CI IMEN SEDT BASIN NO 4
re-r
RIMER (M.)
- I COOUNC PIPE (TYPJ
isi a RIP RAP OUTLET
4 - EC1 PROTEC13N (TYP.)
L ISSUED FOR
CONSTRUCTION
LEM
//ISnmo
SITE—
rms....
I he / 4 Basiswill 6 e-d signed ��B. to IS Piedmont Natural Gas ----_
�flLD /4e en[. mawcm+Ran
�n ♦. d " / {u � w. � � � weans Is. oars
ON msnmae
' 1 ' / {R — 11 r'._ ✓ i PERMITTED WASTE I SM \ r .ux'In�axan
/ • / �i\41i FGNfF/i n-�+""^s"a"
�•"�.! ��/ - . NOvWASTE, BE °
Z�o __-01
— `PLACRMTSDE4 -sE6�
xsma�,+
ea
PERTTEDgW STE WITS [HOUSE Staceya
rnith o m,R+
APPROXIMAIE SPRING
BOX LOG�RON�-
TPCtU
I
N.11.,c cadErosi
M .ur I addition to the installed
silt feeling, thee. areas have received�
u / i
+ � TRANSFER `
additional features, including rock check �-�
Area of AMID
GOODS
, dame, diversion ditches, and temporary active filling: This as the WIOY— �
y only area of active waste filling. The HANOLN FACILITY
catch and sediment basins. ImIT .located waste is being filled to grade Rot
r a"mex+ The..at. in concentrated in the center \� �mlva� � we—Nsam
f Ph... 1 and .xc.nae wee twaxa \ ass.rz n5R +aW +Nr'
ASSOCUTED WM ME WORK UNDER THIS CONTRACT AND FOR ) Rwg.wrm naxa+mab aw.l M \\\\
+RVIM[HW..arousce
'•%�••••'•• f:"= CQNGUALCC WM A.COALL FEDERAL. GULAENS,AAND DINLOCAL .HEALTHAN'
a.s WO aeau. nwrd
R art� SAFETY CANS CODES RECULATONS, ANO CROINAMC£S INCLUOWG \ mx DS vet was rcxry llauosw
OUT NOT LIMITED TO THOSE CURRENTLY MANDATED BY ME
11PMk cm gCIXS OCCUPATCNAL SAfETY AND HEALTH ADMIMSTRATICNE IOW)
sc if
FL O 0
Z a N Z
0owg
M,
U99Oo
zsmr
oLM:
UtAJ I. N
�¢oZ
>3 t°3
a

.g North Carollns Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Waste Management
Solid Waste section
APPLICATION FOR
HOUSEHOLD HAZARDOUS WASTE IDENTIFICATION NUMBER
A household hazardous waste I.D. number shall be required to ship collected materials offslte for treatment and/or processing.
Please check the appropriate box and flit in the blanks.
Temporary Event ® Permanent Facility ❑
nPER ATnPfrnNTR ACTnQ
Facility/Event Host
Ave Coun , NC
Contact Person
Buddy Norris
Title Solid Waste Director
Mailing Address
PO Box 640
City
Newland
State NC
Zip 28657
Phone
828-737-5420
1 Fax
828-733-8293
1 E-mail
l,[e-mail]
On -Site Contractor
Clean Harbors Environmental Services, Inc.
Contact Person
Ron Meeks I
Title Tech. Svcs. General Mgr.
-Mailing Address-
.-208-Wallin ton Industrial Drive
City
Reidsville I
State NC
Zip 27320
Phone [phone] Fax [phone]
1
E-mail
[e-mail]
TRANSPORTER
Company Name
Clean Harbors Environmental Services, Inc. ID No. MAD039322250
Contact Person
Ron Meeks Title TSGM
Mailing Address
208 Watlin ton Industrial Drive
Ci
Reidsville State I NC I Zip 27320.
Phone [phone] Fax [phone] E-mail I meeksr cleanharbors.com
DISPOSER/RECYCLER
Company Name
Clean Harbors Environmental Services, Inc. ID No. NCD000648451
Contact Person
Ron Meeks Title TSGM
Mailing Address
208 Watlin ton industrial Drive
city
Reidsville I State NC =Zip 127320
Phone [phone] Fax [phone] E-mail I meeksr cleanharbors.com
Cnl I PCTlnhl nPTAri c
Physical Location of Event/Facility
269 Vale Road, Newland, NC 28657
Date ofTemporary Event(if applicable)
8-29-09
Materials To Be Collected
Cleaners, herbicides, aerosols, waxes, paints, varnishes, batteries,
auto products
Materials To Be Recycled
paints, solvents, motor oil, batteries
Additional Comments
Clean Harbors will be the Generator of the waste.
CERTIFICATION OF OPERATOR/CONTRACTOR
I certify that the information supplied is accurate and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief, and that
this facility will only accept household hazardous waste. I am authorized to make this request on behalf of the
operator at the location given.
Name Steve Willis Title Technical Services
Representative
Company Clean Harbors Environmental Services, Inc.
Signature Date Date 8-12-09

I
Purpose: Application for household hazardous waste identification number. This number shall be used
to ship collected materials off -site for treatment and/or processing.
Distribution: Mail completed original to the following address:
Division of Waste Management
Solid Waste Section
1646 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1646
Disposition: This form shall be maintained in accordance with the standards of the Solid Waste
Section's Records Disposition Schedule published by the North Carolina Division of
Archives and History.
The Solid Waste Section shall assign an identification number upon receipt of application
*Temporary Day - Upon completion of a Temporary Collection day, a report on HHW collected,
disposed, and recycled shall be returned to the Solid Waste Section.
*Permanent Site - An annual report on HHW collected, disposed, and recycled shall be returned to
the Solid Waste Section.
SOLID WASTE SECTION USE ONLY
Date Received:
Date Approved:
HHW ID Number:

A MA
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and
Beverly Eaves Perdue
Governor
August 13, 2009
Buddy Norris
Solid Waste Director
Avery County
PO Box 640
Newland, NC 28657
Dear Mr. Norris;
Division of Waste Management
Dexter Matthews
Director
RE:
Avery County Collection Event
Household Hazardous Waste Collection Day — 8/29/2009
HHW Temporary ID NO. NCTH00609011
Natural Resources
Dee Freearan
Secretary
The Solid Waste Section received your application for a household hazardous waste identification
number to be used for the shipment of collected materials off -site on 8/29/2009. Your Household
Hazardous Waste Temporary I.D. number is NCTH00609011, and the event is to be held at 269 Vale
Road, in Newland, NC in Avery County.
Upon completion of your collection day, please return a listing of the number of households
participating in the event, the type and quantity of material collected, and its destination (recycling,
reuse, recovery, or disposal) to the Solid Waste Section. The Section will use this information to develop
an annual report detailing collection, treatment, disposal, and recycling of household hazardous waste in
North Carolina.
If you have any questions or comments, please contact Ellen Lorscheider at [phone],
Sincerely,
Ellen Lorscheider
Environmental Programs Manager
Solid Waste Section
cc: R. Meeks, Cleanharbors
Deb Aja, Western District Supervisor
Bill Wagner, Waste Management Specialist
1646 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1646
Phone [phone] FAX [phone] Internet http://wastenotne.org
An Equal Opportunity /Affirmative Action Employer— Printed on Dual Purpose Recycled Paper

Purpose: Application for household hazardous waste identification number. This number
shall be used to ship collected materials off -site for treatment and/or processing.
Distribution: Mail completed original to the following address:
Division of Waste Management
Solid Waste Section
1646 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1646
[phone]
Disposition: This form shall be maintained in accordance with the standards of the Solid Waste
"--- -Sec-tion'sBec6i s DTsposition Schedule published by the North Carlln�ivlslon
of Archives and History.
The Solid Waste Section shall assign an identification number upon receipt of application.
*Temporary Day — Upon completion of a Temporary Collection day, a report on HHW
collected, disposed, and recycled shall be returned to the Solid Waste Section.
*Permanent Site- An annual report on HHW collected, disposed, and recycled shall be returned
to the Solid Waste Section.
SOLID WASTE SECTION USE ONLY
Date Received: 8/12/09
Date Approved: 8/13/09
HHW ID Number: N C T H00609011

RICHARDSON SMITH GARDNER & ASSOCIATES
=16ring and -...
August 31, 2009
Ms. Starr Silvis, P.E.
Assistant Regional Engineer
NCDENR - Land Quality Section
2090 U.S. Highway 70
Swannanoa, North Carolina 28778
RE: Stormwater Management Plan Modification
Avery County C & D Landfill Expansion
NC Solid Waste Permit No. 06-03
Dear Ms. Silvis:
On behalf of Avery County, Richardson Smith Gardner & Associates (RSG) is hereby submitting
two (2) copies of the enclosed modification' to the stormwater management plan for the
expansion of the construction and demolition debris (C&D) landfill disposal area in Ingalls,
North Carolina.
As you may recall, there was a potential impact to a gas line that runs along the southern portion
of the property in the proximity of Sediment Basin No. 4. Following a field locate by Piedmont
Natural Gas (Piedmont), the basin required modification to provide buffer from this gas line for
safety purposes. RSG coordinated this modification with Piedmont to fit the revised Basin No. 4
between the landfill and their proposed easement. Therefore, we have included revised
calculations for the sediment basin and drawing revisions (attached) to the Waste Relocation
and Site Improvements' project previously submitted.
We appreciate your attention and we are prepared to respond immediately to any questions or
concerns regarding this modification.
Correspondence dated August 19, 2009 regarding approval of land disturbance plan by Ms. Starr
Silvis, P.E., NCDENR.
Site meeting on August 4, 2009 at the Avery County C&D Landfill.
a Waste Relocation Plan and Site Improvements Construction Drawings dated July 2009 by
Richardson Smith Gardner & Associates, Inc.
14 N. BOYLAN AVENUE • RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27603 9 TEL. [phone] • WWW.RSGENGINEERS.COM

Ms. Starr Silvis
May 18, 2009
Page 2 of 2
Please feel free to contact me by phone at [phone] ext. 127 or by email at
s tacey(&rsgengineers. Com.
Sincerely,
Gardner & Associates, Inc.
E.
Project Manager
Art.
Cc: Mr. Henry "Buddy" Norris, Avery County Solid Waste Department
Mr. Allen Gaither, NCDENR
Mr. Bill Wagner, NCDENR
File
H:\Prolects\Avery County (NC)\Avery-08-4 (Phase III PTC)\E&SC Ranletter 8-31.09.wpe

mCIIARU30H5afITHCARRNER6-1mCIAiES SHEET: I
JOBW'. AVERYA]-1
' 14N. vym Aoenue Te,'. 81602e05]] DATE: A2WOB Rev2, 119109, RA0W7109
Raleigh, NC 2]e03 Fax'. 91 M20 3308 BY: KBS, Revl. TBM, Rai KBE W271M
CHKO BY:
Avery County Landfill
Sediment Basin Analysis Basin NO.: Basin • 4
Amiga Braining lot, Baeln'
Area
grain.,. Ar¢a
lacteal
A1. LaM011Slopis
2T
A2. Curvatures
1.2
Total =
3.9 Acres
Basin Requirements:
WetWet She'
Requlrea Storage Capal gvAc1=
0Enter"0" if Net Applicable.
Required Star... Capa*RIP)=
0
Required Depth of Wet Storage pfll=
00 Enter"0" if Ngt Applicable.
Starnme
Required Storage Cal felAc.)=
1,800 To Crest of Principal Spillway
Required Storage Capacity (lia)=
7,020
Multipier (%) for Desired Surface Area lop x%)=
Om At Crest of Pill Spillway
Peak Discharge from Basin lOp)pefs)=
13.7 From HydroCAD- 25Np 24-Hr. Storm
Oesired Surtaw Area Ans)=
0.14
Desired Surlaw Area ots)=
5,955
Determine Stave-Stamve Function'
Carl Area Area
Incremental Cumulative Stage In
Ins
285t
1M) lacreal
Volume ge) Volume (0) (n)
2.670 2,000 0.05
0 0
2.872 4,305 0,10
6.305 6,305 2 8.75
0.69
200
2,874 8,982 0,16
11,287 17,592 4 9,78
1.39
4.00
2,076 9,924 0.23
28,458 34,763 6 10,46
1.79
6.00
ml
Llneat Rev slog Coatings -
Ks = 2,133 Storage =2133 x"155
6= 155
'CAUTION: CHECK INPUT FOR REGRESSION ANALYSISI
Stage-Burface Area Relationship Stage -Storage Relationship
2n
2:a
26]6
2W4
a Sal
2s]2
gal
25]0
sale
0 Bela 10.000 15,000 al 25,000 30000 31 40,000
Stamps pa,
SEA (Page I of 4) Basin -4 rev.exla

Basin Design Elevations:
Elev, of eotbm at Bain=
28700
Wets
Required Storage Capaury(I?) =
0
Min Elev. of Wet Storage(Penument Pool)=
28700
Selected Elev. of Wet Storage (Permanent Poop=
2870.0 O.K.
Actual Wet Storage Volume (fte)=
0O.N.
Don, Bounce
Bequlred Storage Capacity (fle) _
Min. Elev. of Fundpal SpilWay =
Selected Elev. of Principal SpilMay=
Actual Total Storage Volume (fl)=
Desired Surface Area get =
Actual Surface area at PfAcipal Solway get=
Cleaccut
Cleanout Requirement I% of Wet Storage)=
Cleanout Requirement (%Cf Total Storage)=
Basin Cleanout Volume (fl)=
Basin Cleanout Elevation =
Dowatmimo of Dry Storage:
Refer to Drain Time Calculation For Skimmer.
7,020 = Requlrod Dry Storage a Actual Wet Stomee
2872,2
28]S0 O.K.
11.667 O.K.
5.955
6.008 O.N.
0 Enter "0' If Not Applicable
33
3,84] Based on 33%of Total Storage Volume
2891.6
Rie6ertlzcn emilk O rommA Azzwletez, Inc. Sel (Pape 2 of 4) .-in -4 rev.].xle

SHEET:
ROUTE DESIGN STORM' Use Hydi or Chair Method.
JOB an AVERY-07-1
DATE: 5129/08, Rev2. 119109, Rev3 W27109
Design Paromelers'
BY: KBS. Rai TBM, Rev2. KBS 6/2]/09
Design Steam: 25.Ye 2e-Hr
OHKD BY:
Design Sterm Rainfall (in) = 825
Rainfall 0istratifi :Type II
Bunch sound: SCS TR-20
Results'
Marlmum Pool Elevill r: 287620
Surface Area at Minimum Pi(fls)= 7,219
Peak Discharge(cfs)= 111
Check Settling Et ckarm,
Partice Data:
Nam.(mlcmns)= 60
Speed Gravity = 2.65
Selging Vell(11/s)= 0.004140
Reynolds No.(f0S)= 0.046206 O.K.
Ea along Data'
Desired Efficiency in)= 80
No. of ERecllve Cells = 3 1J- of baffles fustlflas Defective cells.
Settling EFdanry(%)= WAS O.K.
DESIGN OUTLET STRUCTURES'
Design Riser/Barml Structures
Bomr011
Type of Riser: CPP-Circular
Rlser Bare Elevation = 20700
Riser Top Elevation = 28/3.0
Riser Heicar (fl)= 3.0
Outlets:
Outlet No. I(for 0ewatering Dry Storage): Simfri.): Ne pertontlons In finer.
Intent Elevation:
Outlet No. 2(Principal Spillway): Size: 18-
InvedElevation 28730
Barrel Design
Type of Barrel CMP
Oiameair(in)- 15
Inv. In Elevation= 2070)
Inv. Out Elevation= 28680
Length(R)= 65.0
Slope (RIB)= 0.031
RlcnaNeon Smith GeMner fl Aeeociates.l— SBJ (Pepe 3.1 T) 9min-0 rev 3 Ws

SHEET:
JOB AVERY-07-1
Riser Base Calculations:
DATE: W29108, Fill 119109, Reb 8I27I09
BY: KBS, Rai TEM, ROQ, KB58127109
Design UOIM Force'.
CHKO BY:
Fillet of Safety=
1.25
F(unidpatell(Ibis)=
413
0
0
0
0
Buoyantof Riser Top dins)
0
Acting
Buoyant Wl. of Sung uro Ed BSoild s)=
0
Reinssinc of
Slltlln9 Re6i6tdnceot Surrounding SOA(Ibs)=
0
F (dtlju6letl)(Ibs)=
613
Gonuete Base'
Required Volume of Conchard(11)=
d]
LealM1 ((tj=
3.0
Witlth (fl)=
3.0
Thickness (it)
2.0
Actual Volume of Concocts, (Is)
18.0 O.K.
II r I native) Deel n Ilte
Slope of Upabeam Ent benkment(zH:iOf
3
Slope of Outlet PiKd")=
0,031
L6(it)=
24
Number of Collars:
2
Length of Each C0llar(H)=
3.0 Form Design Chad Based on Ls and No. of Collars
Width Of Each C0llar(fl)=
3.0 FrOm Design Chad Barad on Ls and No. of Collars
Collar Projection, P(fl)=
0.875
Spacin0 of Sub6¢gU¢nt Anil Cairns (it)
12 = 14P
Ememand, SDIIIwav Calculations:
Crest Elov. bi)=
2876.0
Required Freebard(H)=
2.0
Top of Ben El¢d.(it)=
2878.0
Required Capacity four) =
42 Form HytlroCAD-25-Y424-HC Storm
Driving Head hO
11.2 From HytlroCAD -25-Yr, 34�Hr. Storm
Weir 00¢Flcient
3.0
Length of Crest(R)=
158 Determine by Weir SauallOn'
Desgn Chat Len0th(ft)=
20
Length' 20 H minimum.
SUMMARY DATA:
Basin No.: Basin .4
Ele¢ of Bottom of Basin =
28700
Cleanout Elee(it)=
2871.5
Elea of Wet Storage (Permanent Pool) =
NA
Elea of Principal Spillway
28730 See Above for Riser and Other Design Information.
Emergency Spillway Its, (it)
28760
Top of Berm Eka(it)=
28760
Barrel Diameter (in)
15
Barrel Slope(%)=
3,1
Riehaiidmn Smith Omtlnas BAasrclelen, Inc. 663 (Page4 of 4) Basin-4 rev Sde

cl
<4

25-Year24-Hour Storm Event
Avery co -Final rev 4
Prepared by Richardson Smith Gardner & Associates, Inc. Page 1
HydroCAD® 8.00 s/n 004004 © 2006 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC 8/31/2009
Area Listing (all nodes)
Area (acres) CN Description (subcats)
18.450 69 50-75% Grass cover, Fair, HSG B(23S,31S,35S,41S,53S,58S,59S,60S)
18.450

25-Year24-Hour Storm Event
Avery co -Final rev 4 Type // 24-hr 25-yr Rainfall= 7.23 "
Prepared by Richardson Smith Gardner & Associates, Inc. Page 2
HvdroCAD® 8.00 s/n 004004 © 2006 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC 8/31/2009
Time span=1.00-20.00 hrs, dt=0.05 hrs, 381 points
Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS
Reach routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method - Pond routing by Stor-Ind method
Subcatchment 235: DA - 4 Runoff Area=2.700 ac Runoff Depth>3.41"
Subcatchment 31S: DA - 3
Subcatchment 355: DA - 2
Subcatchment 41S: DA - 1
Subcatchment 53S: DA-31)
Subcatchment 58S: DA-3A
Subcatchment 59S: DA-313
Subcatchment 60S: DA-3C
Tc=5.0 min CN=69 Runoff=17.96 cfs 0.768 of
Runoff Area=0.570 ac Runoff Depth>3.41"
Tc=5.0 min CN=69 Runoff=3.79 ds 0.162 of
Runoff Area=5.700 ac Runoff Depth>3.41"
Tc=5.0 min CN=69 Runoff=37.92 cfs 1.622 of
Runoff Area=3.730 ac Runoff Depth>3.41"
Tc=5.0 min CN=69 Runoff=24.81 cfs 1.061 of
Runoff Area=1.200 ac Runoff Depth>3.41"
Tc=5.0 min CN=69 Runoff=7.98 cfs 0.341 of
Runoff Area=1.070 ac Runoff Depth>3.41"
Tc=5.0 min CN=69 Runoff=7.12 cfs 0.304 of
Runoff Area=1.920 ac Runoff Depth>3.41"
Tc=5.0 min CN=69 Runoff=12.77 cfs 0.546 of
Runoff Area=1.560 ac Runoff Depth>3.41"
Tc=5.0 min CN=69 Runoff=10.38 cfs 0.444 of
Reach 45R: DP-1 Avg. Depth=0.68' Max Vet=31.65 fps Inflow=24.81 cfs 1.061 of
D=18.0" n=0.013 L=520.0' S=0.3115 T Capacity=58.63 cfs Outflow=24.20 cfs 1.061 of
Reach 46R: DP-2 Avg. Depth=0.89' Max Vet=34.41 fps Inflow=37.92 cfs 1.622 of
D=18.0" n=0.013 L=750.0' 5=0.2960'/' Capacity=57.15 cfs Outflow=36.69 cfs 1.621 of
Reach 47R: DP-3 Avg. Depth=0.81' Max Vet=26.48 fps Inflow=25.90 cfs 1.110 of
D=18.0" n=0.013 L=320.0' S=0.1875'/' Capacity=45.49 cfs Outflow=25.42 cfs 1.109 of
Reach 58R: DC-2 Avg. Depth=0.19' Max Vet=5.07 fps Inflow=7.29 cfs 0.719 of
n=0.035 L=340.0' S=0.1471 T Capacity=140.52 cfs Outflow=7.32 cfs 0.718 of
Reach 59R: DC-1 Avg. Depth=0.18' Max Vet=5.06 fps Inflow=7.34 cfs 0.807 of
n=0.035 L=370.0' S=0.1514 T Capacity=142.56 cfs Outflow=7.34 cfs 0.805 of
Reach 60R: C-4 Avg. Depth=0.40' Max Vet=21.11 fps Inflow=7.98 cfs 0.341 of
D=18.0" n=0.013 L=75.0' S=0.2400'/' Capacity=51.46 cfs Outflow=7.94 cfs 0.341 of
Pond 26P: Basin - 4 Peak Elev=2,874.20' Storage=19,006 cf Inflow=25.42 cfs 1.109 of
Discarded=0.11 cfs 0.090 of Primary=9.32 cfs 0.726 of Secondary=4.24 cfs 0.028 of Outflow=13.67 cfs 0.843 of

25-Year 24-Hour Storm Event
Avery co -Final rev 4 Type 11 24-hr 25-yr Rainfall= 7.23 "
Prepared by Richardson Smith Gardner & Associates, Inc. Page 3
HydroCAD® 8.00 s/n 004004 © 2006 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC 8/31/2009
Pond 34P: Basin -3 Peak Elev=2,934.73' Storage=30,168 cf Inflow=34.06 cfs 1.457 of
Discarded=0.21 cfs 0.171 of Primary=7.29 cfs 0.719 of Secondary=0.00 cfs 0.000 of Outflow=7.50 cfs 0.890 of
Pond 36P: Basin - 2 Peak Elev=2,948.74' Storage=33,957 cf Inflow=36.69 cfs 1.621 of
Discarded=0.21 cfs 0.170 of Primary=7.34 cfs 0.807 of Secondary=0.00 cfs 0.000 of Outflow=7.55 cfs 0.976 of
Pond 4413: Basin - 1 Peak EIev=3,011.75' Storage=25,946 cf Inflow=24.20 cfs 1.061 of
Discarded=0.21 cfs 0.160 of Primary=1.95 cfs 0.350 of Secondary=0.00 cfs 0.000 of Outflow=2.16 cfs 0.509 of
Pond 55P: DI-3A Peak EIev=3,014.44' Inflow=7.12 cfs 0.304 of
18.0" x 200.0' Culvert Outflow=7.12 cfs 0.304 of
Pond 56P: DI-313 Peak EIev=2,972.73' Inflow=19.89 cfs 0.851 of
24.0" x 250.0' Culvert Outflow=19.89 cfs 0.851 of
Pond 57P: DI-3C Peak EIev=2,939.00' Inflow=30.27 cfs 1.295 of
24.0" x 170.0' Culvert Outflow=30.27 cfs 1.295 of
Total Runoff Area = 18.450 ac Runoff Volume = 5.249 of Average Runoff Depth = 3.41"
100.00% Pervious Area = 18.450 ac 0.00% Impervious Area = 0.000 ac

25-Year24-Hour Storm Event
Avery co -Final rev 4 Type/1 24-hr 25-yr Rainfall= 7.23 "
Prepared by Richardson Smith Gardner & Associates, Inc. Page 4
HydroCADO 8.00 s/n 004004 © 2006 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC 8/31/2009
Subcatchment 23S: DA - 4
Runoff = 17.96 cfs @ 11.96 hrs, Volume= 0.768 af, Depth> 3.41"
Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 1.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs
Type II 24-hr 25-yr Rainfall=7.23"
Area (ac) CN Description
2.700 69 50-75% Grass cover, Fair HSG B
2.700 Pervious Area
Tc Length Slope
5.0
Description
Direct Entry,
Subcatchment 23S: DA - 4
17.(
Type II 24-hr 25-yr
Rainfall=7.23"
Runoff Area=2.700 ac
Runoff Volume=0.768 of
Runoff Depth>3.41"
Tc=5.0-min
CN=69
6 7 8 9 1u 11
Time (hours)
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
® Runoff

25-Year24-Hour Storm Event
Avery co -Final rev 4 Type II 24-hr 25-yr Rainfall= 7.23 "
Prepared by Richardson Smith Gardner & Associates, Inc. Page 5
HydroCADO 8.00 s/n 004004 @ 2006 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC 8/31/2009
Subcatchment 31 S: DA - 3
Runoff = 3.79 cfs @ 11.96 hrs, Volume= 0.162 af, Depth> 3.41"
Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 1.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs
Type II 24-hr 25-yr Rainfall=7.23"
Area (ac) CN Description
0.570 69 50-75% Grass cover, Fair HSG B
0.570 Pervious Area
Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description
(min) (feet) (ft/ft) (f /sec) (cfs)
5.0 Direct Entry,
Subcatchment 31 S: DA - 3
Hydrograph
a 3.79 CfS ®Runoff
Type II 24-hr 25-yr
Rainfall=7.23"
3 Runoff Area=0.570 ac
Runoff Volume=0.162 of
Runoff Depth>3.41"
LL 2. Tc=5.0 min
CN=69
7 8 9 10 11
Time (hours)

25-Year24-Hour Storm Event
Avery co -Final rev 4 Type 1124-hr 25-yr Rainfall= 7.23 "
Prepared by Richardson Smith Gardner & Associates, Inc. Page 6
HydroCAD®8 00 s/n 004004 © 2006 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC 8/31/2009
Subcatchment 35S: DA - 2
Runoff = 37.92 cfs @ 11.96 hrs, Volume= 1.622 af, Depth> 3.41"
Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 1.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs
Type II 24-hr 25-yr Rainfall=7.23"
Area (ac) CN Description
5.700 69 50-75% Grass cover, Fair HSG B
5.700 Pervious Area
Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description
5.0
Direct Entry,
Subcatchment 35S: DA - 2
Hydrograph
42 - - - - - ®Runoff
40 37.92 cfs
36 Type II 24-hr 25-yr
34_ .--Rainfall=7.23".._.
32-
3o Runoff Area=5.700 ac
26 Runoff Volume=1.622'af
22 Runoff Depth>341"
20- Tc=5.0 min
16- CN=69
14-
12...
10
8
4:
8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
Time (hours)

25-Year24-Hour Storm Event
Avery co -Final rev 4 Type/1 24-hr 25-yr Rainfall= 7.23 "
Prepared by Richardson Smith Gardner & Associates, Inc. Page 7
HydroCAD® 8.00 s/n 004004 © 2006 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC 8/31/2009
Subcatchment 41S: DA -1
Runoff = 24.81 cfs @ 11.96 hrs, Volume= 1.061 af, Depth> 3.41"
Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 1.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs
Type II 24-hr 25-yr Rainfall=7.23"
Area (ac) CN Description
3.730 69 50-75% Grass cover, Fair, HSG B
3.730 Pervious Area
Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description
(min) (feet) (ft/ft) (f /sec) (cfs)
5.0 Direct Entry,
Subcatchment 41 S: DA -1
26.` 24.81 cfs ®Runo
24. Type II 24-hr 75-yr
22` Ralnfall=7.23'"
20. Runoff Area=3.730 ac
18.. - -Runoff Volume=1.061-..af - - - -
�^ 16.
3 14 Runoff Depth>3.41"
E 12- Tc=5.0 mill
10 CN=69
8-
6-
4
2
8 9 10 11
Time (hours)

25-Year 24-Hour Storm Event
Avery co -Final rev 4 Type // 24-hr 25-yr Rainfall= 7.23 "
Prepared by Richardson Smith Gardner & Associates, Inc. Page 8
HydroCADO 8.00 s/n 004004 © 2006 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC 8/31/2009
Subcatchment 53S: DA-3D
Runoff = 7.98 cfs @ 11.96 hrs, Volume= 0.341 af, Depth> 3.41"
Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 1.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs
Type II 24-hr 25-yr Rainfall=7.23"
Area (ac) CN Description
1.200 69 50-75% Grass cover, Fair, HSG B
1.200 Pervious Area
Tc Length
Description
5.0 Direct Entry,
Subcatchment 53S: DA-31)
® Runoff
7.98 cfs
8- Type II 24-hr 25-yr
7 Rainfall=7.23" ,.... _.
6 Runoff Area=1.200 ac;
Runoff Volume=0.341,af
5 Runoff Depth>3.41"
.2 4- Tc=5.0 min
3 CN=69
6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
Time (hours)

25-Year24-Hour Storm Event
Avery co -Final rev 4 Type // 24-hr 25-yr Rainfall= 7.23 "
Prepared by Richardson Smith Gardner & Associates, Inc. Page 9
HydroCAD® 8.00 s/n 004004 © 2006 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC 8/31/2009
Subcatchment 58S: DA-3A
Runoff = 7.12 cfs @ 11.96 hrs, Volume= 0.304 af, Depth> 3.41"
Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 1.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs
Type II 24-hr 25-yr Rainfall=7.23"
Area (ac) CN Description
1.070 69 50-75% Grass cover, Fair, HSG B
1.070 Pervious Area
Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description
(min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs)
5.0 Direct Entry,
Subcatchment 58S: DA-3A
Hydrograph
7.12
7 Type II 24-hr 25-yr
Rainfall=7.23"
g-
Runoff Area=1.070 ac
5. Runoff Volume=0.304'.af
Runoff Depth>3.41"
4 Tc=5.0 min
3 CN=69
i
10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
Time (hours)
® Runoff

25-Year24-Hour Storm Event
Avery co -Final rev 4 Type // 24-hr 25-yr Rainfall= 7.23 "
Prepared by Richardson Smith Gardner & Associates, Inc. Page 10
HydroCAD® 8.00 s/n 004004 © 2006 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC 8/31/2009
Subcatchment 59S: DA-3B
Runoff = 12.77 cfs @ 11.96 hrs, Volume= 0.546 af, Depth> 3.41"
Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 1.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs
Type II 24-hr 25-yr Rainfall=7.23"
Area (ac) CN Description
1.920 69 50-75% Grass cover, Fair HSG B
1.920 Pervious Area
Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description
(min) (feet) (ft/ft) (fUsec) (cfs)
5.0 Direct Entry,
Subcatchment 59S: DA-3B
14 12.77 Cfs I- ®Runoff
13 Type II 24•hr 25-yr
11- Rainfall=7.23"
10- Runoff Area=1.920 ac
Runoff Volume=0.546 of
3: Runoff Depth>3.41
3 7-
6
Tc=5.0 min
5- CN=69_-.
4-
3.. -.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
Time (hours)

25-Year24-Hour Storm Event
Avery co -Final rev 4 Type 11 24-hr 25-yr Rainfall= 7.23 "
Prepared by Richardson Smith Gardner & Associates, Inc. Page 11
HydroCAD® 8.00 s/n 004004 @ 2006 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC 8/31/2009
Subcatchment 60S: DA-3C
Runoff = 10.38 cfs @ 11.96 hrs, Volume= 0.444 af, Depth> 3.41"
Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 1.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs
Type II 24-hr 25-yr Rainfall=7.23"
Area (ac) CN Description
1.560 69 50-75% Grass cover, Fair HSG B
1.560 Pervious Area
Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description
(min) (feet) (fUft) (fUsec) (cfs)
5.0 Direct Entry,
Subcatchment 60S: DA-3C
Hydrograph
11- 10.38 CfS ®izunoN
10 Type II 24-hr 25-yr
9- Rainfall=7.23
Runoff Area=1.560 ac
Runoff Volume=0.444 of
Runoff Depth>3.41"
5 Tc=5.0 min
9
2-
1
10 11
Time (hours)

25-Year24-Hour Storm Event
Avery co -Final rev 4 Type // 24-hr 25-yr Rainfall= 7.23 "
Prepared by Richardson Smith Gardner & Associates, Inc. Page 12
HydroCAD®8 00 s/n 004004 © 2006 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC 8/31/2009
Reach 45R: DPA
Inflow Area = 3.730 ac, Inflow Depth > 3.41" for 25-yr event
Inflow = 24.81 cfs @ 11.96 hrs, Volume= 1.061 of
Outflow = 24.20 cfs @ 11.97 hrs, Volume= 1.061 af, Atten= 2%, Lag= 0.5 min
Routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method, Time Span= 1.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs
Max. Velocity= 31.65 fps, Min. Travel Time= 0.3 min
Avg. Velocity = 10.56 fps, Avg. Travel Time= 0.8 min
Peak Storage= 403 cf @ 11.96 hrs, Average Depth at Peak Storage= 0.68'
Bank -Full Depth= 1.50', Capacity at Bank -Full= 58.63 cfs
18.0" Diameter Pipe, n= 0.013 Corrugated PE, smooth interior
Length= 520.0' Slope= 0.3115 '/'
Inlet Invert= 3,170.00', Outlet Invert= 3,008.00'
Reach 45R: DPA
®InFlow
24.81 cfs m onmow
26 Inflow Area=3.730 ac 124.20 cfs
24
22 Avg. Depth=0.68'
20_ ....Max-Vel=31.65 fps..... _.. _.
14 n=0.013
u. 12 L=520.0'
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17
Time (hours)

25-Year24-Hour Storm Event
Avery co -Final rev 4 Type 1124-hr 25-yr Rainfall= 7,23 "
Prepared by Richardson Smith Gardner & Associates, Inc. Page 13
HydroCAD® 8.00 s/n 004004 © 2006 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC 8/31/2009
Reach 46R: DP-2
Inflow Area = 5.700 ac, Inflow Depth > 3.41" for 25-yr event
Inflow = 37.92 cfs @ 11.96 hrs, Volume= 1.622 of
Outflow = 36.69 cfs @ 11.97 hrs, Volume= 1.621 af, Atten= 3%, Lag= 0.7 min
Routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method, Time Span= 1.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs
Max. Velocity= 34.41 fps, Min. Travel Time= 0.4 min
Avg. Velocity = 11.76 fps, Avg. Travel Time= 1.1 min
Peak Storage= 815 cf @ 11.96 hrs, Average Depth at Peak Storage= 0.89'
Bank -Full Depth= 1.50', Capacity at Bank -Full= 57.15 cfs
18.0" Diameter Pipe, n= 0.013 Corrugated PE, smooth interior
Length= 750.0' Slope= 0.2960 T
Inlet Invert= 3,170.00', Outlet Invert= 2,948.00'
Reach 46R: DP-2
42
37.9;
40
Inflow Area=5.700 ac 36.69 <
34
Avg. Depth=0.89'
30
Max Vet=34..41 fps
26-
D=18.0"
2z
n=0.013
28
L=750.0'
14
S=0.2960 '/'
10
Capacity=57.15 cfs
1 2 3 4 5 8 7 8 9 10 11
Time (hours)

25-Year24-Hour Storm Event
Avery co -Final rev 4 Type // 24-hr 25-yr Rainfall=7.23"
Prepared by Richardson Smith Gardner & Associates, Inc. Page 14
HydroCADO 8.00 s/n 004004 @ 2006 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC 8/31/2009
Reach 47R: DP-3
Inflow Area = 3.900 ac, Inflow Depth > 3.41" for 25-yr event
Inflow = 25.90 cfs @ 11.96 hrs, Volume= 1.110 of
Outflow = 25.42 cfs @ 11.96 hrs, Volume= 1.109 af, Atten= 2%, Lag= 0.4 min
Routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method, Time Span= 1.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs
Max. Velocity= 26.48 fps, Min. Travel Time= 0.2 min
Avg. Velocity = 8.95 fps, Avg. Travel Time= 0.6 min
Peak Storage= 310 cf @ 11.96 hrs, Average Depth at Peak Storage= 0.81'
Bank -Full Depth= 1.50', Capacity at Bank -Full= 45.49 cfs
18.0" Diameter Pipe, n= 0.013 Corrugated PE, smooth interior
Length= 320.0' Slope= 0.1875'/'
Inlet Invert= 2,930.00', Outlet Invert= 2,870.00'
Reach 47R: DP-3
Hydrograph
28' 25.90 cfs ® oulFlow
26Inflow Area=3.900 ac 25.42 cfs
24 Avg. Depth=0.81'
22 _Max Vet=26.48 fps
20
18 D=18.0"
16 n=0.013
LL ,z L=320.0'
10 S=0.1875'If
a Capacity=4549 cfs_
8 9 10 11
Time (hours)

25-Year24-Hour Storm Event
Avery co -Final rev 4 Type 1l 24-hr25-yr Rainfall= 7.23 "
Prepared by Richardson Smith Gardner & Associates, Inc. Page 15
HydroCAD® 8.00 s/n 004004 @ 2006 HydrOCAD Software Solutions LLC 8/31/2009
Reach 58R: DC-2
Inflow Area = 5.120 ac, Inflow Depth > 1.69" for 25-yr event
Inflow = 7.29 cfs @ 12.12 hrs, Volume= 0.719 of
Outflow = 7.32 cfs @ 12.16 hrs, Volume= 0.718 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 2.6 min
Routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method, Time Span= 1.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs
Max. Velocity= 5.07 fps, Min. Travel Time= 1.1 min
Avg. Velocity = 2.10 fps, Avg. Travel Time= 2.7 min
Peak Storage= 530 cf @ 12.12 hrs, Average Depth at Peak Storage= 0.19'
Bank -Full Depth= 1.00', Capacity at Bank -Full= 140.52 cfs
8.00' x 1.00' deep channel, n= 0.035
Side Slope Z-value= 2.0 7' Top Width= 12.00'
Length= 340.0' Slope= 0.1471 7'
Inlet Invert= 2,928.00', Outlet Invert= 2,878.00'
Reach 58R: DC-2
Hydrograph
E Inflow
® Outflow
Inflow Area=5.120 ac, ,."
Avg. Depth=0.19'
6- Max Vet=5.07 fps
5- n=0.035
3 4- L=340.0'
0
LL S=0.1471 T
3
Capacity=140.52 cfs
2
Time )hours)

25-Year24-Hour Storm Event
Avery co -Final rev 4 Type // 24-hr 25-yr Rainfall= 7.23 "
Prepared by Richardson Smith Gardner & Associates, Inc. Page 16
HydroCAD®8 00 s/n 004004 © 2006 HydrOCAD Software Solutions LLC 8/31/2009
Reach 59R: DC-1
Inflow Area = 5.700 ac, Inflow Depth > 1.70" for 25-yr event
Inflow = 7.34 cfs @ 12.15 hrs, Volume= 0.807 of
Outflow = 7.34 cfs @ 12.15 hrs, Volume= 0.805 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min
Routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method, Time Span= 1.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs
Max. Velocity= 5.06 fps, Min. Travel Time= 1.2 min
Avg. Velocity = 2.24 fps, Avg. Travel Time= 2.7 min
Peak Storage= 553 cf @ 12.10 hrs, Average Depth at Peak Storage= 0.18'
Bank -Full Depth= 1.00', Capacity at Bank -Full= 142.56 cfs
8.00' x 1.00' deep channel, n= 0.035
Side Slope Z-value= 2.0 7' Top Width= 12.00'
Length= 370.0' Slope= 0.1514'/'
Inlet Invert= 2,942.00', Outlet Invert= 2,886.00'
Reach 5911: DC-1
8- Inflow Area=5.700 a 7.34 cfs
7 Avg. Depth=0.18'
6- Max Vel=5.06 fps
5- n=0.035
3 4 L=370.0'
LL S=0.1514 '/
3 Capacity=142.56 cfs
2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
Time (hours)
® IR_-
® Outflow

Avery co -Final rev 4
Prepared by Richardson Smith Gardner &
25-Year24-Hour Storm Event
Type 11 24-hr 25-yr Rainfall= 7.23 "
Inc. Page 17
tions LLC 8/31/2009
Reach 60R: C-4
Inflow Area =
1.200 ac,
Inflow Depth > 3.41"
for 25-yr event
Inflow =
7.98 cfs @
11.96 hrs, Volume=
0.341 of
Outflow =
7.94 cfs @
11.96 hrs, Volume=
0.341 af, Atten= 1 %, Lag= 0.1 min
Routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method, Time Span= 1.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs
Max. Velocity= 21.11 fps, Min. Travel Time= 0.1 min
Avg. Velocity = 6.88 fps, Avg. Travel Time= 0.2 min
Peak Storage= 28 cf @ 11.96 hrs, Average Depth at Peak Storage= 0.40'
Bank -Full Depth= 1.50', Capacity at Bank -Full= 51.46 cfs
18.0" Diameter Pipe, n= 0.013 Concrete pipe, bends & connections
Length= 75.0' Slope= 0.2400 7'
Inlet Invert= 2,918.00', Outlet Invert= 2,900.00'
"10
Reach 60R: C-4
Hydrograph
Inflow Area=1.200 ac 17.94 cfs
Avg. Depth=0.40'
Max Vet=21.'11 fps
D=18.0•'
n=0.013
L=75.0'
S=0.2400 '/'
Capacity=51.46 cfs
6 7 8 9 10 11
Time (hours)
® Inflow
® oulFlow

25-Year 24-Hour Storm Event
Avery co -Final rev 4 Type/1 24-hr 25-yr Rainfall=7.23"
Prepared by Richardson Smith Gardner & Associates, Inc. Page 18
HydroCAD@ 8.00 s/n 004004 © 2006 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC 8/31/2009
Pond 26P: Basin - 4
Inflow Area = 3.900 ac, Inflow Depth > 3.41" for 25-yr event
Inflow = 25.42 cfs @ 11.96 hrs, Volume=
1.109 of
Outflow = 13.67 cfs @ 12.06 hrs, Volume=
0.843 af, Atten= 46%, Lag= 5.8 min
Discarded = 0.11 cfs @ 11.00 hrs, Volume=
0.090 of
Primary = 9.32 cfs @ 12.06 hrs, Volume=
0.726 of
Secondary = 4.24 cfs @ 12.06 hrs, Volume=
0.028 of
Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 1.00-20.00 hrs,
dt= 0.05 hrs
Peak Elev= 2,874.20' @ 12.06 hrs Surf.Area= 7,274 sf
Storage= 19,006 cf
Plug -Flow detention time= 98.4 min calculated for 0.841 of (76% of inflow)
Center -of -Mass det. time= 36.9 min ( 823.1 - 786.2 )
Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description
#1 2,870.00' 34,498 cf Custom Stage Data (Prismatic)Listed below (Recalc)
Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store
(feet) (sq-ft) (cubic -feet) (cubic -feet)
2,870.00 2,000 0 0
2,872.00 4,305 6,305 6,305
2,874.00 6,982 11,287 17,592
2,876.00 9,924 16,906 34,498
Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices
#1 Discarded 2,870.00' Skimmer
Head (feet) 0.00 0.50 6.00
Disch. (cfs) 0.000 0.110 0.110
#2 Primary 2,870.00' 15.0" x 65.0' long Culvert CPP, square edge headwall, Ke= 0.500
Outlet Invert= 2,868.00' S= 0.0308 T Cc= 0.900
n= 0.013 Corrugated PE, smooth interior
#3 Device 2 2,873.00' 18.0" Horiz. Riser Limited to weir flow C= 0.600
#4 Secondary 2,874.00' 20.0' long x 10.0' breadth Broad -Crested Rectangular Weir
Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60
Coef. (English) 2.49 2.56 2.70 2.69 2.68 2.69 2.67 2.64
4iscarded OutFlow Max=0.11 cfs @ 11.00 hrs HW=2,870.53' (Free Discharge)
1=Skimmer (Custom Controls 0.11 cfs)
Primary OutFlow Max=9.22 cfs @ 12.06 hrs HW=2,874.17' (Free Discharge)
t 9tculvert (Passes 9.22 cfs of 11.13 cfs potential flow)
3=Riser (Orifice Controls 9.22 cfs @ 5.22 fps)
2eco4=13road Crest d Rectangular Weir (Weir�Cont Controls 3.71 c18'@(1.05 Discharge)

25-Year24-Hour Storm Event
Avery co -Final rev 4 Type // 24-hr 25-yr Rainfall= 7.23 "
Prepared by Richardson Smith Gardner & Associates, Inc. Page 19
HydroCAD® 8.00 s/n 004004 © 2006 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC 8/31/2009
Pond 26P: Basin - 4
Hydrograph
25.42 cfs ® Inflow
m Outflow
Inflow Area=3.900 ac ® Discarded
® Primary
28- Peak Elev=2,874.20' ®Secondary
24. Storage=19,006 cf
22
20 .67 cfs^
18-
14.
M 12{ 9.32 cfs
1a
4.24 cfs
1 2 3 4 5 8 7 8 9 10 11
Time (hours)

25-Year 24-Hour Storm Event
Avery co -Final rev 4 Type/1 24-hr 25-yr Rainfall= 7.23 "
Prepared by Richardson Smith Gardner & Associates, Inc. Page 20
HydroCADO 8.00 s/n 004004 @ 2006 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC 8/31/2009
Pond 3413: Basin -3
Inflow Area = 5.120 ac, Inflow Depth > 3.41" for 25-yr event
Inflow = 34.06 cfs @ 11.96 hrs, Volume=
1.457 of
Outflow = 7.50 cfs @ 12.12 hrs, Volume=
0.890 af, Atten= 78%, Lag= 9.7 min
Discarded = 0.21 cfs @ 11.00 hrs, Volume=
0.171 of
Primary = 7.29 cfs @ 12.12 hrs, Volume=
0.719 of
Secondary = 0.00 cfs @ 1.00 hrs, Volume=
0.000 of
Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 1.00-20.00 hrs,
dt= 0.05 hrs
Peak Elev= 2,934.73' @ 12.12 hrs Surf.Area= 8,547 sf
Storage= 30,168 cf
Plug -Flow detention time= 136.6 min calculated for 0.888 of (61 % of inflow)
Center -of -Mass det. time= 61.5 min ( 847.3 - 785.7 )
Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description
#1 2,929.00' 42,088 cf Custom Stage Data (Prismatic)Listed below (Recalc)
Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store
(feet) (sq-ft) (cubic -feet) (cubic -feet)
2,929.00 2,524 0 0
2,930.00 3,325 2,925 2,925
2,932.00 5,234 8,559 11,484
2,934.00 7,549 12,783 24,267
2,936.00 10,272 17,821 42,088
Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices
#1 Discarded 2,929.00' Skimmer
Head (feet) 0.00 0.50 7.00
Disch. (cfs) 0.000 0.210 0.210
#2 Primary 2,929.00' 15.0" x 100.0' long Culvert CPP, square edge headwall, Ke= 0.500
Outlet Invert= 2,928.00' S= 0.01007' Cc= 0.900
n= 0.013 Corrugated PE, smooth interior
#3 Device 2 2,934.00' 18.0" Horiz. Riser Limited to weir flow C= 0.600
#4 Secondary 2,935.00' 10.0' long x 20.0' breadth Broad -Crested Rectangular Weir
Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60
Coef. (English) 2.68 2.70 2.70 2.64 2.63 2.64 2.64 2.63
Discarded OutFlow Max=0.21 cfs @ 11.00 hrs HW=2,929.52' (Free Discharge)
L1=Skimmer (Custom Controls 0.21 cfs)
Primary OutFlow Max=7.22 cfs @ 12.12 hrs HW=2,934.72' (Free Discharge)
't-2=Culvert (Passes 7.22 cfs of 11.77 cfs potential flow)
3=Riser (Orifice Controls 7.22 cfs @ 4.08 fps)
econdary OutFlow Max=0.00 cfs @ 1.00 hrs HW=2,929.00' (Free Discharge)
=Broad -Crested Rectangular Weir( Controls 0.00 cfs)

25-Year24-Hour Storm Event
Avery co -Final rev 4 Type 1124-hr 25-yr Rainfall= 7.23 "
Prepared by Richardson Smith Gardner & Associates, Inc. Page 21
HydroCADO 8.00 s/n 004004 O 2006 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC 8/31/2009
Pond 34P: Basin -3
Hydrograph
34.06 CfS
® Inflow
In Outflow
Inflow Area=5.120 ac
®Discarded
--
® Primary
33.
Peak Elev=,2,934.73'
®Secondary
3-
"
-
Storage=30,168 cf -'
-
32
..
28-
_.
26_
_..
24-
a 22E
;.
u 20.
_..
18.
" 16_.
�7.50 cfs
14-
12
7.29 cfs
0.00 cfs
10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
Time (hours)

25-Year 24-Hour Storm Event
Avery co -Final rev 4 Type // 24-hr 25-yr Rainfall= 7.23 "
Prepared by Richardson Smith Gardner & Associates, Inc. Page 22
HydroCADO 8.00 s/n 004004 @ 2006 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC 8/31 /2009
Pond 36113: Basin - 2
Inflow Area = 5.700 ac, Inflow Depth > 3.41" for 25-yr event
Inflow = 36.69 cfs @ 11.97 hrs, Volume=
1.621 of
Outflow = 7.55 cfs @ 12.15 hrs, Volume=
0.976 af, Atten= 79%, Lag= 10.8 min
Discarded = 0.21 cfs @ 11.05 hrs, Volume=
0.170 of
Primary = 7.34 cfs @ 12.15 hrs, Volume=
0.807 of
Secondary = 0.00 cfs @ 1.00 hrs, Volume=
0.000 of
Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 1.00-20.00 hrs,
dt= 0.05 hrs
Peak Elev= 2,948.74' @ 12.15 hrs Surf.Area= 9,070 sf
Storage= 33,957 cf
Plug -Flow detention time= 139.4 min calculated for 0.974 of (60% of inflow)
Center -of -Mass det. time= 63.9 min ( 850.5 - 786.5 )
Volume Invert Avaii.Stora a Storage Description
#1 2,943.00' 46,331 cf Custom Stage Data (Prismatic)Listed below (Recalc)
Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store
(feet) (sq-ft) (cubic -feet) (cubic -feet)
2,943.00 3,153 0 0
2,944.00 2 4,001 3,577 3,577
2,946.00 5,919 9,920 13,497
2,948.00 8,134 14,053 27,550
2,950.00 10,647 18,781 46,331
Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices
#1 Discarded 2,943.00' Skimmer
Head (feet) 0.00 0.50 7.00
Disch. (cfs) 0.000 0.210 0.210
#2 Primary 2,943.00' 15.0" x 50.0' long Culvert CPP, square edge headwall, Ke= 0.500
Outlet Invert= 2,942.00' S= 0.0200 7' Cc= 0.900
n= 0.013 Corrugated PE, smooth interior
#3 Device 2 2,948.00' 18.0" Horiz. Riser Limited to weir flow C= 0.600
#4 Secondary 2,949.00' 20.0' long x 30.0' breadth Broad -Crested Rectangular Weir
Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60
Coef. (English) 2.68 2.70 2.70 2.64 2.63 2.64 2.64 2.63
?scarded OutFlow Max=0.21 cfs @ 11.05 hrs HW=2,943.52' (Free Discharge)
1=Skimmer (Custom Controls 0.21 cfs)
Primary OutFlow Max=7.34 cfs @ 12.15 hrs HW=2,948.74' (Free Discharge)
Ltculvert (Passes 7.34 cfs of 13.37 cfs potential flow)
3=Riser (Orifice Controls 7.34 cfs @ 4.15 fps)
$econdary OutFlow Max=0.00 cfs @ 1.00 hrs HW=2,943.00' (Free Discharge)
T 4=13road-Crested Rectangular Weir( Controls 0.00 cfs)

Avery co -Final rev 4
Prepared by Richardson Smith Gardner & Associates, Inc.
HvdrOCAD® 8.00 s/n 004004 © 2006 HvdroCAD Software Solutions
Pond 36P: Basin - 2
4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
Time (hours)
25-Year24-Hour Storm Event
Type // 24-hr 25-yr Rainfall=7.23"
Page 23
® Inflow
fl8 Outflow
® Discarded
® Primary
® Secondary

25-Year 24-Hour Storm Event
Avery co -Final rev 4 Type/1 24-hr 25-yr Rainfall=7.23"
Prepared by Richardson Smith Gardner & Associates, Inc. Page 24
HydroCADO 8.00 s/n 004004 © 2006 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC 8/31/2009
Pond 44P: Basin -1
Inflow Area = 3.730 ac, Inflow Depth > 3.41" for 25-yr event
Inflow = 24.20 cfs @ 11.97 hrs, Volume= 1.061 of
Outflow = 2.16 cfs @ 12.50 hrs, Volume= 0.509 af, Atten= 91 %, Lag= 32.2 min
Discarded = 0.21 cfs @ 11.60 hrs, Volume= 0.160 of
Primary = 1.95 cfs @ 12.50 hrs, Volume= 0.350 of
Secondary = 0.00 cfs @ 1.00 hrs, Volume= 0.000 of
Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 1.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs
Peak Elev= 3,011.75' @ 12.50 hrs Surf.Area= 9,070 sf Storage= 25,946 cf
Plug -Flow detention time= 176.5 min calculated for 0.508 of (48% of inflow)
Center -of -Mass det. time= 96.0 min ( 882.3 - 786.3 )
Volume Invert Avail Storage Storage Description
#1 3,008.00' 49,609 cf Custom Stage Data (Prismatic)Listed below (Recalc)
Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store
(feet) (sq-ft) (cubic -feet) (cubic -feet)
3,008.00 4,888 0 0
3,010.00 6,992 11,880 11,880
3,012.00 9,365 16,357 28,237
3,014.00 12,007 21,372 49,609
Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices
#1 Discarded 3,008.00' Skimmer
Head (feet) 0.00 0.50 5.00
Disch. (cfs) 0.000 0.210 0.210
#2 Primary 3,008.00' 15.0" x 45.0' long Culvert CPP, square edge headwall, Ke= 0.500
Outlet Invert= 3,006.00' S= 0.04447' Cc= 0.900
n= 0.013 Corrugated PE, smooth interior
#3 Device 2 3,011.50' 18.0" Horiz. Riser Limited to weir flow C= 0.600
#4 Secondary 3,012.50' 20.0' long x 10.0' breadth Broad -Crested Rectangular Weir
Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60
Coef. (English) 2.49 2.56 2.70 2.69 2.68 2.69 2.67 2.64
Discarded OutFlow Max=0.21 cfs @ 11.60 hrs HW=3,008.52' (Free Discharge)
t1=Skimmer (Custom Controls 0.21 cfs)
Primary OutFlow Max=1.94 cfs @ 12.50 hrs HW=3,011.75' (Free Discharge)
t2=Cuivert (Passes 1.94 cfs of 10.45 cfs potential flow)
3=Riser (Weir Controls 1.94 cfs @ 1.64 fps)
econdary OutFlow Max=0.00 cfs @ 1.00 hrs HW=3,008.00' (Free Discharge)
=Broad -Crested Rectangular Weir( Controls 0.00 cfs)

Avery co -Final rev 4
Prepared by Richardson Smith Gardner & Associates, Inc.
HvdroCADO 8.00 s/n 004004 © 2006 HvdroCAD Software Solutions
25-Year24-Hour Storm Event
Type // 24-hr 25-yr Rainfall=7.23"
Page 25
Pond 44P: Basin - 1
Hydrograph
24.20 cfs
Inflow Area=3.730 ac
26-:
Peak Elev=3,011..75' -
24-
Storage=25,946 cf
22
20
18=
16
3
LL
8.
_ 9 1 R rfe tsa_
.95 cfs
6 7 8 9 10 11
Time (hours)
® Inflow
m Outflow
® Discarded
ED Primary
® Sewndary

25-Year24-Hour Storm Event
Avery co -Final rev 4 Type 1124-hr 25-yr Rainfall= 7.23 "
Prepared by Richardson Smith Gardner & Associates, Inc. Page 26
HydroCADO 8.00 s/n 004004 @ 2006 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC 8/31/2009
Pond 55P: DI-3A
Inflow Area = 1.070 ac, Inflow Depth > 3.41" for 25-yr event
Inflow = 7.12 cfs @ 11.96 hrs, Volume= 0.304 of
Outflow = 7.12 cfs @ 11.96 hrs, Volume= 0.304 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min
Primary = 7.12 cfs @ 11.96 hrs, Volume= 0.304 of
Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 1.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs
Peak Elev= 3,014.44' @ 11.96 hrs
Flood Elev= 3,016.00'
Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices
#1 Primary 3,013.00' 18.0" x 200.0' long Culvert CPP, square edge headwall, Ke= 0.500
Outlet Invert= 2,973.00' S= 0.2000 T Cc= 0.900
II
n= 0.013 Corrugated PE, smooth interior
Primary OutFlow Max=6.97 cfs @ 11.96 hrs HW=3,014.41' (Free Discharge)
t1=Culvert (Inlet Controls 6.97 cfs @ 4.04 fps)
Pond 55P: DI-3A
Hydrograph
® Primary
Inflow Area=1.070 a 7.12
Peak Elev=3,014.44'
18.011 x 200.0' Culvert
u
4_.
LL
3
2
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
Time (hours)

25-Year24-Hour Storm Event
Avery co -Final rev 4 Type 1124-hr 25-yr Rainfall= 7.23 "
Prepared by Richardson Smith Gardner & Associates, Inc. Page 27
W,Arn('4r)n A nn �1n MAMA rn nnna u..A...nnn n_u.,___ n_:...:__- i I n-1-1..__..
Pond 56P: DI-313
Inflow Area = 2.990 ac, Inflow Depth > 3.41" for 25-yr event
Inflow = 19.89 cfs @ 11.96 hrs, Volume= 0.851 of
Outflow = 19.89 cfs @ 11.96 hrs, Volume= 0.851 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min
Primary = 19.89 cfs @ 11.96 hrs, Volume= 0.851 of
Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 1.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs
Peak Elev= 2,972.73' @ 11.96 hrs
Flood Elev= 2,976.00'
Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices
#1 Primary 2,970.00' 24.0" x 250.0' long Culvert CPP, square edge headwall, Ke= 0.500
Outlet Invert= 2,939.00' S= 0.1240 T Cc= 0.900
n= 0.013 Corrugated PE, smooth interior
Primary OutFlow Max=19.46 cfs @ 11.96 hrs HW=2,972.65' (Free Discharge)
t1=Culvert (Inlet Controls 19.46 cfs @ 6.19 fps)
Pond 56P: DI-3B
Hydrograph
ia Inflow
21 22 - - Primary
20 Inflow Area=2.990 a 119.89 cfs ®
18 Peak Elev=2972.73'
17-
15 24.011 x 250.0' Culvert
14. '.
y 13-
11
° 10.
8-
7 _...
6-
3.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 15 17
Time (hours)

25-Year24-Hour Storm Event
Avery co -Final rev 4 Type // 24-hr 25-yr Rainfall=7.23"
Prepared by Richardson Smith Gardner & Associates, Inc. Page 28
HydroCAD®8 00 s/n 004004 @ 2006 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC 8/31/2009
Pond 57P: DI-3C
Inflow Area = 4.550 ac, Inflow Depth > 3.41" for 25-yr event
Inflow = 30.27 cfs @ 11.96 hrs, Volume= 1.295 of
Outflow = 30.27 cfs @ 11.96 hrs, Volume= 1.295 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min
Primary = 30.27 cfs @ 11.96 hrs, Volume= 1.295 of
Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 1.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs
Peak Elev= 2,939.00' @ 11.96 hrs
Flood Elev= 2,942.00'
Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices
#1 Primary 2,934.00' 24.0" x 170.0' long Culvert CPP, square edge headwall, Ke= 0.500
Outlet Invert= 2,930.00' S= 0.0235 T Cc= 0.900
n= 0.013 Corrugated PE, smooth interior
Primary OutFlow Max=29.61 cfs @ 11.96 hrs HW=2,938.83' (Free Discharge)
1-1=Culvert (Inlet Controls 29.61 cfs @ 9.42 fps)
Pond 57P: DI-3C
Hydrograph
30 Inflow Area=4.550 a so.27 `
26 ....Peak Elev=2,939.00'
26
24- 24.0 x 170.0' Culvert
22-
.. 20
W
18
c 16r:
12
10 __.
8-
6--
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
Time (hours)
FM —Infi—aw
© Primary

SHEET 1 OF
PROJECT Avery County C&D Landfill JOB NO. "ERY-08-5
DATE 1/5/09 Rev.8/27/09
SUBJECT Skimmer Capacity Analysis COMPUTED BY TBM, Rev. KBS
CHECKED BY
Objective To select the appropriate skimmer orifice size for a sediment basin skimmer outlet.
Reference North Carolina Division of Land Resources (2006), North Carolina Erosion & Sediment Control
Planning & Design Manual, Raleigh, NC.
Analysis The following approach is used in the design of down pipes:
Calculations
Results
1. Select an orifice size. Calculate the discharge flow capacity and time to drain from the
principal spillway crest to the bottom of the basin.
2. If the drain time exceeds 72 hours, then a larger orifice is needed. If the drain time is less
than 24 hours, then a smaller orifice is needed
- Orifice Equation:
Q=
Cda 2gh
where: Q
= flow capacity of inlet (cfs)
C,j
— coefficient of discharge (use 0.6)
a
= cross -sectional area of orifice (ft')
g
= gravitational constant (32.2 ft/sz)
h
= head (assume 0.25 ft)
For a 4-inch orifice, the calculated capacity is 0.21 cfs.
For a basin volume between 20,500 cf and 28,500 cf, the calculated drain time is 27 to 38 hours.
Therefore, a 4-inch orifice is suitable for Basins No. 1 through No. 3.
For a 3-inch orifice, the calculated capacity is 0.117 cfs.
For a basin volume 19,800 cf, the calculated drain time is 30 hours.
Therefore, a 3-inch orifice is suitable for Basin No. 4
SHIMMER CAPACITY.WPD
RICHARDSON SMITH GARDNER & ASSOCIATES
Engineering and Geological Services
14 N. Boylan Avenue, Raleigh, NC 27603
Telephone: [phone]

Skimmer Basin
Okay
3.9 Disturbed Area (Acres)
2.83 Peak Flow from 10-year Storm (cfs)
7020 Required Volume ft3
920 Required Surface Area ft2
21.4 Suggested Width ft
42.9 Suggested Length ft
170Trial Top Width at Spillway Invert ft
50 Trial Top Length at Spillway Invert ft
3 Trial Side Slope Ratio Z:1
3 Trial Depth ft (2 to 3.5 feet above grade)
152 Bottom Width ft
32 Bottom Length ft
4864 Bottom Area ft2
19884 Actual Volume ft3 Okay
8500 Actual Surface Area ft2 Okay
4; Trial Weir Length ft
0.5 Trial Depth of Flow ft
4.2 Spillway Capacity cfs Okay
4 Skimmer Size (inches)
0.333 Head on Skimmer (feet)
3 Orifice Size (1/4 inch increments)
1.66 Dewatering Time (days)
Suggest about 3 days

NIII@II'�b�INIINIIIIN��
2009003926
AVER' rA, NC FEE 4
T7.00
STATE OF NO REAL ESTATE E%TX
ssa.00
o. xam
0a-28-2009 02:01:52 PM
TA RagER
airvry cninosnw
BK: RE 440
PG:2195-2196
NORTH CAROUNA GENERAL WARRANTY DEED
Excise Tax $36.00
Prepared by: ✓Harrison & Poore, P.A., PO Box 248, Spruce Pine NC 28777
Parcel Id Number: A 1.27 acre portion of 1821-00-17-7337
Brief Description: Altamord Township
THIS DEED made this the__ _j,[_ day of 2009, by and between
GRANTOR
10:. IMMA
MARK S. LECHLER and wife, BRENDA A. LECHLER
AVERY COUNTY, A Body Politic
Property Transfer Card Merle
Date OS
By�o
The designation Grantor and Grantee as used herein shall include said parties, their
successors, and assigns, and shall include singular, plural, masculine, feminine or neuter as required
by context.
WITNESSETH, that the Grantor, for a valuable consideration paid by the Grantee, the
receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, has and by these presents does grant, bargain, sell and
convey unto the Grantee in fee simple, all that certain lot or parcel of land situated in Altamont
Township, Avery County, North Carolina and more particularly described as follows:
BEGINNING at an iron found located at the northwest comer of the property herein
described, and further being located in the margin of an existing private road; thence N 09'
34' E 131.71 feet to a railroad spike set, a comer common with what is now or formerly
Avery County; thence N 74° 02' E 189.85 feet to an iron set; thence N 40° 44, E 142.90 feet
to an iron set, a comer common between the Grantor and Avery County; thence S 22' 32' E
189.13 feet to an iron set; thence S 22' 3T E 20.00 feet to a point in the centerline of an
existing private road; thencewith the center oftheexisting private road the following courses
and distances: S 67 ° 57' W 149.02 feet, S 75 0 29' W 177.57 feet, S 75 ° 29' W 50.54 feet;
thence leaving the centerline N 49' 50' lU 24.73 feet to the point of BEGINNING.
Containing 1.27 acres and being the property described on the survey map by Michael M.
Lacey, PLS No. L-1497, map dated 29 June 2009, map file no. 09-06-23-048.
FURTHER BEING a portion of the property of record in Book 400, Page 2518 ofthe Avery
County Register of Deeds.
ALSO CONVEYED HEREWITH ajoint non-exclusive easement and right of way over
the existing private road which serves Altamont Acres which leads from U.S. Highway 221
to State Road 1101 (Brushy Creek Road).
"goof

RE 440 2196
SUBJECT TO a 22 %a foot wide joint non-exclusive road right of way easement crossing
the above described property as shown on that map of record in Book 39, Page 148A of the
Avery County Registry.
This property is conveyed subject to the following restrictions:
No mobile home, either single -wide or double -wide, shall he placed upon the said
property.
2. Any modular home to be placed or constructed upon said property must be
permanently affixed to the foundation. All residences placed or constructed on the property
shall have wood floor joists and wood rafters. There shall be no steel in the foundation
framework.
GRANTORS HEREBY AGREE that all other restrictions in that Deed of record in Book
400, Page 2518 of the Avery County Registry are hereby lifted and removed from this
conveyance.
The property heremabove described was acquired by the Grantor by instrument recorded in
Deed Book 400, Page 2518.
A map showing the above described property is recorded in Plat Book _, Page
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the aforesaid lot or parcel of land and all privileges and
appurtenances thereto belonging to the Grantee in Fee Simple.
And the Grantor covenants with the Grantee that the Grantor is seized of the premises in fee
simple, has the right to convey the same in fee simple, that title is marketable and free and clear of
all eacumbrances, and that the Grantor will warrant and defend the title against the lawful claims of
all persons whomsoever except for the exceptions hereinafter stated.
Title to the property hereinabove described is subject to the following exceptions:
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, The Grantorhas hereunto set his hand and seal, or if corporate,
has caused this instrument to be signed in its corporate name by its duly authorized officers and its
seat to be hereunto affixed by authority of its Board ofDirectors, the day
`nand year 'rst above written.
AL)
Mark S. Lechler
6UNa A Aa.v`-V' SEAL)
Brenda A. Lechler
STATE OF
COUNTY OF T e
I, a Notary Public of the County and State aforesaid, certify that, Mark S. Lechler and Brenda A.
Lechler, Grantor(s), Personally appeared before me this day andacknowledged the execution of the
foregoingbrstrument. Witness myhand and official stamp orseal, this3i ,dayof 2009.
My Commission Expires: 151 lo' l I
No Pubic
ryy�ge„• IUTXRYNA.JDaaEtaDN
NNnyPWrc•91NEd Flarlle rioted Name
SEAL -STAMP rNrrmmw»r pc nyrs,rmt
cwnmwmn � oo e�za+s
m,aen�nNruwxd.rslw.

\d/WDU
o
Z.
�'
/))/\§j)
\/
' e };\A
);
/(\
:� 6 e
�
�:��..
«
p
� �\
!
;
��
/
uo
«
�Mai \
\\.,
-
\
°
s
-
.... ...
\
23
V_
®�
\
t®
%
/
\
t {
�
\
e�
�
{

RICHARDSON SMITH GARDNER & ASSOCIATES
September 1, 2009
Mr. Bill Wagner
Environmental Senior Specialist
Division of Waste Management — NCDENR
2090 US Highway 70
Swannanoa, North Carolina 28778
RE: Waste Relocation and Mitigation Plan — PROGRESS REPORT NO.2
Avery County C&D Landfill
(NC Solid Waste Permit # 06-03)
Ingalls, North Carolina
Dear Bill:
Richardson Smith Gardner & Associates, Inc. (RSG) in cooperation with the Avery County Solid
Waste Department has prepared this joint progress update as to the waste relocation activities at
the above referenced site. As you are aware, certain schedule benchmarks were set under your
condition approvals issued in correspondence dated April 22, 2009 and on May 15, 2009.
Therefore, this letter addresses each benchmark and includes a description of the current
activities being performed to satisfy each requirement as follows:
Benchmark No. 1 (Lechler Property Purchase)
Avery County shall complete the purchase of the Mark S. Lechler parcel.
Progress Statement
Avery County has completed the transaction of the Lechler property. A copy of the
recorded deed will be included in the next report. With this purchase complete,
incorporation of this area into the facility will proceed with permitting.
Benchmark No. 2 (Property Lines and Permit Boundary Surveys)
All property lines and approved final permitted waste boundaries shall be surveyed by a
Registered Land Surveyor and delineated with permanent markers.
Progress Statement
Burleson Truck & Grading (Burleson) was selected by Avery County to conduct the
waste relocation efforts. Burleson has contracted with Appalachian Professional Land
Surveyors and Consultants to assist in the staking and marking of the site improvements.
As areas reach final grades, markers will be placed at permanent and permitted waste
boundaries.
14 N. BOYLAN AVENUE • RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27603 • TEL. [phone] W WW.RSGENGINEERS.COM

Mr. Bill Wagner
September 1, 2009
Page 2 of 4
Benchmark No. 3 (Waste Limit Surveys)
The current limits of waste shall be identified and anywhere these limits differfrom the approved
final permitted waste boundaries they shall be marked with temporary markers.
Progress Statement
Completed.
Benchmark No. 4 (Lateral Expansion Approval)
Within 30-days of the purchase of the Lechler parcel, Avery County shall coordinate with Allen
Gaither concerning the requirements for the proposed "lateral expansion " of the permitted
waste disposal area where approximately 17,500 cubic yards of waste that will be left in place
(Area 5).
Progress Statement
With the property purchase concluded, the process of including this area will begin with
the permitting section.
Benchmark No. 5 (Waste Limit Markers & Map)
Within 30-days of completion of the installation of the permanent property line markers,
permanent final waste limit markers and temporary current waste limit marker, Avery County
shall submit a copy of the survey required in item #2 above to the ARO.
Progress Statement
This item is pending.
Benchmark No. 6 (Submit Erosion and Sediment Control Plan)
Avery County shall submit a revised Sediment and Erosion Control Plan to the Land Quality
Section (LQS) in the ARO, for approval.
Progress Statement
Completed.

Mr. Bill Wagner
September 1, 2009
Page 3 of 4
Benchmark No. 7 (Waste Relocation Activities)
Within 30-days of the approval of the revised Sediment and Erosion Control Plan, Avery County
shall begin the excavation and relocation of the waste that are currently outside of the permitted
waste limits. The excavation and relocation of all wastes currently located outside of the
approved permitted waste limits shall be completed within 240 days of the approval of the
revised Erosion and Sediment Control Plan.
Progress Statement
A pre -construction meeting was held at the site on August 4th. Burleson began
mobilization of equipment in late July/early August. Since that time, the silt fence,
clearing and minor erosion and sediment control measures have been installed. hlitiial
waste relocation efforts began in the vicinity of Sediment Basin's No. 3 as shown in
Figure 1 and further south at Basin No. 4. However, in the case of Basin No. 4, the gas
line easement created a conflict. As of the date of this report, the basin has been
modified satisfactory to Piedmont Natural Gas and a plan revision has been submitted to
the Division of Land Quality regional office for approval. Waste relocated thus far has
been placed in a central location of Phase 1. RSG conducted a site visit on August 28th
as. shown on the site plan (attached).
Figure 1- View to the south showing Sediment Basin 3 on left.

Mr. Bill Wagner
September 1, 2009
Page 4 of 4
Benchmark No. 8 (Abandonment of On -Site Well)
Avery County shall abandon the water supply well that is currently located on the ridge east of
the scale house in compliance with directives by the Aquifer Protection Section.
Progress Statement
Completed.
Benchmark No. 9 (Soil Sampling)
Please conduct soil sampling in order to confirm and verify that there is no residual
contamination from the removal of the wastes located outside the permitted waste boundaries.
The soil samples should be field screened to determine the presence of organics, and the soils
should be analyzedfor Appendix I constituents (of 40 CFR 258).
Progress Statement
This is pending.
We appreciate your attention and we are prepared to respond immediately to any questions or
concerns regarding this application. Please feel free to contact us by phone at [phone] or
by email below.
Sincerely,
Richardson Smith Gardner & Associates, Inc.
I
tac y S lith, P.E.
Project Manager, ext. 127
stacey(d%rs¢engineers.com
Att.
Cc: Mr. Henry "Buddy" Norris, Avery County Solid Waste Department
Mr. Allen Gaither, NCDENR
File
HAolectMvery County (NC)\Avery-09.3 (Waste Relocation and Site improvements)\Construction\Progress Rsports\Progress Report 2 9-1-09.wpd

NGDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Land Resources
Land Quality Section
James D. Simons, PG, PE Beverly Eaves Perdue, Governor
Director and Stale Geologist Dee Freeman, Secretary
September 14, 2009
LETTER OF APPROVAL WITH MODIFICATIONS
Avery County
ATTN: Henry C. Norris, Solid Waste Director
Post Office Box 640
Newland. North Carolina 28657
RE: Project Name: Avery County C&D Landfill —
Stormwater Management Plan — Modification
Acres Approved: 15
Project ID: AVERY-2009-003
County: Avery
Street and City: Brushy Creek Road, Toe River
River Basin: Catawba
Stream Classification: c, Tr
Latitude: 35.9619 Longitude:-81.9719
Submitted By: Richardson, Smith, Gardner & Associates, Inc
Date Received by LOS: 5/20/2009 and 9/1/2009
Plan Type: Revision
Dear Mr. Norris:
This office has reviewed the subject erosion and sedimentation control plan. We find
the plan to be acceptable with modifications and hereby issue this letter of Approval With
Modifications, The Modifications Required for Approval are listed on the attached page. This
plan approval shall expire three (3) years following the date of approval, if no land -disturbing
activity has been undertaken, as is required by Title 15A NCAC 4B .0129.
Please be advised that Title 15A NCAC 4B .0118(a) requires that a copy of the
approved erosion control plan be on file at the job site. Also, you should consider this letter
to give the Notice required by G.S. 113A-61.1(a) of our right of periodic inspection to insure
compliance with the approved plan.
2090 US Highway 70, Swannanoa, North Carolina, 28778-8211
Telephone [phone] Fax [phone] One
www.enr.state.nc.us NorthCarohna
An Equal Opportunity/ Affirmative Action Employer NaAmallu

Letter of Approval with Modifications
Henry C. Norris, Solid Waste Director, Avery County
September 14, 2009
Page 2 of 3
North Carolina's Sedimentation Pollution Control Program is performance -oriented,
requiring protection of existing natural resources and adjoining properties. If, following the
commencement of this project, it is determined that the erosion and sedimentation control
plan is inadequate to meet the requirements of the Sedimentation Pollution Control Act of
1973 (North Carolina General Statute 113A-51 through 66), this office may require revisions
to the plan and implementation of the revisions to insure compliance with the Act.
Acceptance and approval of this plan is conditioned upon your compliance with
Federal and State water quality laws, regulations, and rules. In addition, local city or county
ordinances or rules may also apply to this land -disturbing activity. This approval does not
supersede any other permit or approval.
Please be aware that your project will be covered by the enclosed NPDES General
Stormwater Permit NCGO10000 (Construction Activities). You should first become familiar
with all of the requirements for compliance with the enclosed general permit.
Please note that this approval is based in part on the accuracy of the information
provided in the Financial Responsibility Form, which you.have provided. You are requested
to file an amended form if there is any change in the information included on the form. In
addition, it would be helpful if you notify this office of the proposed starting date for this
project. Please notify William Beck or myself if you plan to have a pre -construction
conference.
Your cooperation is appreciated.
Sincerely,
Starr Silvis, PE
Land Quality Section
Enclosures: Certificate of Approval
Modifications Required for Approval
NPDES Permit
cc: Richardson, Smith, Gardner & Associates, Inc
't -pry C)k, C C LandfiM'LOAMAIM 7

Letter of Approval with Modifications
Henry C. Norris, Solid Waste Director, Avery County
September 14. 2009
Page 3 of 3
MODIFICATIONS REQUIRED FOR APPROVAL
Project Name: Avery County C&D Landfill - Stormwater Management Plan - Modification
Project ID: AVERY-2009-003
County: Avery
Reviewed By: Starr Silvis, PE
Diversions are necessary to direct flow into Sediment Basin 4. All flow must be
directed into the inlet of the sediment basin.
2. Appropriate sediment control measures in accordance with The State of North
Carolina Erosion and Sediment Control Planning and Design Manual shall be
constructed in the area between the creek and Phase 2 upslope of the road crossing
and in the vicinity of the road crossing.
3. This plan approval is valid for portions of the project outside the required trout buffer
zone. Work may not be initiated inside the trout buffer zone without written approval
from the director of the Division of Land Resources. A copy of Trout Buffer Zone
Waiver dated May 1, 2009, is on file in the Asheville Regional Office.
4. All silt fence shall be designed and constructed in accordance with The State of North
Carolina Erosion and Sediment Control Planning and Design Manual Practice
Standards and Specification 6.62.
5. Rolled erosion control fabric is required on all slopes completed between the dates of
October 15th and March 15".
6. Skimmer sediment basins shall be designed and constructed in accordance with The
State of North Carolina Erosion and Sediment Control Planning and Design Manual
Practice Standards and Specification 6.64.
�, tl `��wvE'-`jl .. ��t.0 „�.✓ A<,;

RICHARDSON SMITH GARDNER & ASSOCIATES
no o•
October 1, 2009
Mr. Bill Wagner
Environmental Senior Specialist
Division of Waste Management — NCDENR
2090 US Highway 70
Swannanoa, North Carolina 28778
RE: Waste Relocation and Mitigation Plan — PROGRESS REPORT NO.3
Avery County C&D Landfill
(NC Solid Waste Permit # 06-03)
Ingalls, North Carolina
Dear Bill:
Richardson Smith Gardner & Associates, Inc. (RSG) in cooperation with the Avery County
Solid Waste Department has prepared this joint progress update as to the waste relocation
activities at the above referenced site. As you are aware, certain schedule benchmarks were set
under your condition approvals issued in correspondence dated April 22, 2009 and on May 15,
2009. Therefore, this letter addresses each benchmark and includes a description of the current
activities being performed to satisfy each requirement as follows:
Benchmark No. 1 (Lechler Property Purchase)
Avery County shall complete the purchase of the Mark S. Lechler parcel.
Progress Statement
Avery County has completed the transaction of the Lechler property. A copy of the
recorded deed and map are provided in Attachment 1.
Benchmark No. 2 (Property Lines and Permit Boundary Surveys)
All property lines and approved final permitted waste boundaries shall be surveyed by a
Registered Land Surveyor and delineated with permanent markers.
Progress Statement
Burleson Truck & Grading (Burleson) was selected by Avery County to conduct the
waste relocation efforts. Burleson has contracted with Appalachian Professional Land
Surveyors and Consultants to assist in the staking and marking of the site improvements.
As areas reach final grades, markers will be placed at permanent and permitted waste
boundaries.
14 N. BOYLAN AVENUE o RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27603 9 TEL, 919-828-0577 o WWW.RSGENGINEERS.COM

Mr. Bill Wagner
October 1, 2009
Page 2 of 5
Benchmark No. 3 (Waste Limit Surveys)
The current limits of waste shall be identified and anywhere these limits d fferfrom the approved
,final permitted waste boundaries they shall be marked with temporary markers.
Progress Statement
Completed.
Benchmark No. 4 (Lateral Expansion Approval)
Within 30-days of the purchase of the Lechler parcel, Avery County shall coordinate with Allen
Gaither concerning the requirements for the proposed "lateral expansion " of the permitted
waste disposal area where approximately 17,500 cubic yards of waste that will be left in place
(Area 5).
Progress Statement
At present, the site study remains open with the requirement to install three (3) additional
borings'. Therefore, this additional drilling work and updates to the site study are
anticipated for completion by the end of the year. The response to comments will include
the expanded property boundaries.
Benchmark No. 5 (Waste Limit Markers & Map)
Within 30-days of completion of the installation of the permanent property line markers,
permanent final waste limit markers and temporary current waste limit marker, Avery County
shall submit a copy of the survey required in item #2 above to the ARO.
Progress Statement
This item is pending.
Benchmark No. 6 (Submit Erosion and Sediment Control Plan)
Avery County shall submit a revised Sediment and Erosion Control Plan to the Land Quality
Section (LQS) in the ARO, for approval.
Progress Statement
Completed.
Additional Site Study Work Plan Avery County C&D Landfill Expansion, Permit 06-03, Doc ID 6809, NCDENR,
Division of Waste Management, February 27, 2009.

Mr. Bill Wagner
October 1, 2009
Page 3 of 5
Benchmark No. 7 (Waste Relocation Activities)
Within 30-days of the approval of the revised Sediment and Erosion Control Plan, Avery County
shall begin the excavation and relocation of the waste that are currently outside of the permitted
waste limits. The excavation and relocation of all wastes currently located outside of the
approved permitted waste limits shall be completed within 240 days of the approval of the
revised Erosion and Sediment Control Plan.
Progress Statement
RSG conducted a site visit on September 28th as shown on the site plan (Attachment 2).
Since our previous site visit on August 28th, waste relocation efforts have been focused
across Phase 1 and at the South of Phase 2. Most of Phase 1 has been re -graded within
the revised cover grades and is ready for revegetation, as shown in Figure 1. South of
Phase 2, most of the waste excavation is complete and final waste grades are being
prepared. In the case of Basin No. 4, it has been re -designed and subsequently approved
by the Division of Land Quality regional office (Attachment 3). Further waste
excavation has been completed around Basin No. 3 and relocated to a central location of
Phase 2, as shown in Figure 2.
Figure 1 - View to the south across Phase 1.

Mr. Bill Wagner
October 1, 2009
Page 4 of 5
Figure 1 - View to the south, accross Phase 2, showing Sediment Basin 3 on the left, and
an area of relocated waste on the right.
Benchmark No. 8 (Abandonment of On -Site Well)
Avery County shall abandon the water supply well that is currently located on the ridge east of
the scale house in compliance with directives by the Aquifer Protection Section.
Progress Statement
Completed.
Benchmark No. 9 (Soil Sampling)
Please conduct soil sampling in order to confirm and verify that there is no residual
contamination from the removal of the wastes located outside the permitted waste boundaries.
The soil samples should be field screened to determine the presence of organics, and the soils
should be analyzed for Appendix I constituents (of 40 CFR 258).
Progress Statement
This is pending.

Mr. Bill Wagner
October 1, 2009
Page 5 of 5
We appreciate your attention and we are prepared to respond immediately to any questions or
concerns regarding this application. Please feel free to contact us by phone at [phone] or
by email below.
Sincerely,
Richardson Smith Gardner & Associates, Inc.
ext. 141
P.E.
ext. 127
donorsgengineers.com stacey rsgengineers.com
Att.
Cc: Mr. Henry "Buddy" Norris, Avery County Solid Waste Department
Mr. Allen Gaither, NCDENR
File`
HBProjectsAvery County (NC)Avery-09-3 (Waste Relocation and Site Improvements)\Constnuction\Progress Reports\Progress Report 3 10-1-09.wp0

J
RICHARDSON SMITH GARDNER & ASSOCIATES
November 2, 2009
Mr. Bill Wagner
Environmental Senior Specialist
Division of Waste Management — NCDENR
2090 US Highway 70
Swannanoa, North Carolina 28778
RE: Waste Relocation and Mitigation Plan — PROGRESS REPORT NO. 4
Avery County C&D Landfill
(NC Solid Waste Permit # 06-03)
Ingalls, North Carolina
Dear Bill:
Richardson Smith Gardner & Associates, Inc. (RSG) in cooperation with the Avery County
Solid Waste Department has prepared this joint progress update as to the waste relocation
activities at the above referenced site. As you are aware, certain schedule benchmarks were set
under your condition approvals issued in correspondence dated April 22, 2009 and on May 15,
2009. Therefore, this letter addresses each benchmark and includes a description of the current
activities being performed to satisfy each requirement as follows:
Benchmark No. 1 (Lechler Property Purchase)
Avery County shall complete the purchase of the Mark S. Lechler parcel.
Progress Statement
Completed.
Benchmark No. 2 (Property Lines and Permit Boundary Surveys)
All property lines and approved f nal permitted waste boundaries shall be surveyed by a
Registered Land Surveyor and delineated with permanent markers.
Progress Statement
Burleson Truck & Grading (Burleson) was selected by Avery County to conduct the
waste relocation efforts. Burleson has contracted with Appalachian Professional Land
Surveyors and Consultants to assist in the staking and marking of the site improvements.
As areas reach final grades, markers will be placed at permanent and permitted waste
boundaries.
14 N. BOVLAN AVENUE • RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27603 • TEL. [phone] WW W.RSGENGINEERS.COM

Mr. Bill Wagner
November 2, 2009
Page 2 of 6
Benchmark No. 3 (Waste Limit Surveys)
The current limits of waste shall be identified and anywhere these limits differ from the approved
final permitted waste boundaries they shall be marked with temporary markers.
Progress Statement
Completed.
Benchmark No. 4 (Lateral Expansion Approval)
Within 30-days of the purchase of the Lechler parcel, Avery County shall coordinate with Allen
Gaither concerning the requirements for the proposed "lateral expansion " of the permitted
waste disposal area where approximately 17,500 cubic yards of waste that will be left in place
(Area 5).
Progress Statement
At present, the site study remains open with the requirement to install three (3) additional
borings'. Therefore, this additional drilling work and updates to the site study are
anticipated for completion by the end of the year. The response to comments will include
the expanded property boundaries.
Benchmark No. 5 (Waste Limit Markers & Map)
Within 30-days of completion of the installation of the permanent property line markers,
permanent final waste limit markers and temporary current waste limit markes, Avery County
shall submit a copy of the survey required in item #2 above to the ARO.
Progress Statement
This item is pending.
Benchmark No. 6 (Submit Erosion and Sediment Control Plan)
Avery County shall submit a revised Sediment and Erosion Control Plan to the Land Quality
Section (LQS) in the ARO, for approval.
Progress Statement
Completed.
1
Additional Site Study Work Plan Avery County C&D Landfill Expansion Permit 06-03 Doe ID 6809, NCDENR,
Division of Waste Management, February 27, 2009,

Mr. Bill Wagner
November 2, 2009
Page 3 of 6
Benchmark No. 7 (Waste Relocation Activities)
Within 30-days of the approval of the revised Sediment and Erosion Control Plan, Avery County
shall begin the excavation and relocation of the waste that are currently outside of the permitted
waste limits. The excavation and relocation of all wastes currently located outside of the
approved permitted waste limits shall be completed within 240 days of the approval of the
revised Erosion and Sediment Control Plan.
Progress Statement
RSG conducted a site visit on
October 21, 2009 as shown on the
site plan (Attachment 1). Since
our previous site visit on
September 28th, waste relocation
efforts have been completed in
almost all areas of Phase 1 and
Phase 2. Phase 1 has included
some survey verification, is
within the revised cover grades,
and,is ready for revegetation, as
shown in Figure 1.
Drop inlet No. DI-3A has been
installed and outlets into Basin
No. 3 as shown in Figure 2.
Figure 1 - View to the north across Phase 1
Figure 2 - View to the east across Basin 3 showing
outlet from DI-3C.

Mr. Bill Wagner
November 2, 2009
Page 4 of 6
Basin No. 3 is almost complete with the
exception of the skimmer and baffle
installation. The discharge cascade
feature from Basin No. 3 has been
installed as shown in Figure 3.
Basin No. 4 has been staked and should
begin within the next two (2) weeks as
shown in Figure 4.
Figure 3 - View to the north up the cascade from
Basin 3.
Figure 4 - View to the north across the location of
Basin 4.

Mr. Bin Wagner
November 2, 2009
Page 5 of 6
The straw wattles are
being installed accross the
northern half of Phase 1 as
shown in Figure 5.
Figure 5 - Straw wattle installation across Phase 1.
Benchmark No. 8 (Abandonment of On -Site Well)
Avery County shall abandon the water supply well that is currently located on the ridge east of
the scale house in compliance with directives by the Aquifer Protection Section.
Progress Statement
Completed.
Benchmark No. 9 (Soil Sampling)
Please conduct soil sampling in order to confirm and verb that there is no residual
contamination from the removal of the wastes located outside the permitted waste boundaries.
The soil samples should be field screened to determine the presence of organics, and the soils
should be analyzed for Appendix I constituents (of 40 CFR 258).
Progress Statement
This is pending.

Mr. Bill Wagner
November 2, 2009
Page 6 of 6
We appreciate your attention and we are prepared to respond immediately to any questions or
concerns regarding this application. Please feel free to contact us by phone at [phone] or
by email below.
Sincerely,
Richardson Smith Gardner & Associates, Inc.
/OnM' __.-
enheirn
Project Scientist, ext. 141
don(cDrs gengineers. com
l 1S j'1
Stacey A,. Smitl P.E.
Project Manager, ext. 127
staceyp,,rsgengineers. com
Att.
Cc: Mr. Henry "Buddy" Norris, Avery County Solid Waste Department
Mr. Allen Gaither, NCDENR
File
H1ProjectsWvey County (NC)lwv-09-3(Waste Reloostlon and Site Improvements)\Construction\Pra9mss Reports\pro9ress_mport_102709.nd
14 N. BOVLAN AVENUE • RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27603 • TEL. [phone] • W W W.RSGENGINEERS.COM

Wagner, Bill
From: Don Misenheimer [[e-mail]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 25, 2009 3:39 PM
To: [e-mail];'Buddy Norris'; [e-mail]; [e-mail]
Subject: Progress Meeting - Waste Relocation and Site Improvements
Gentlemen,
A progress meeting for the Avery County C&D Landfill — Waste Relocation and Site Improvements project has been
scheduled for December 4, 2009 at 8:30-9:00 am. We look forward to seeing you there. Please contact us with any
questions or comments.
Kind Regards,
Don Misenheimer
Richardson Smith Gardner & Associates, Inc.
14 N. Boylan Ave.
Raleigh, NC 27603
0: 919-828-0577x141
C: 919-815-4315
F., 919-828-3899

Wagner, Bill
From: Don Misenheimer [[e-mail]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 25, 2009 4:00 PM
To: [e-mail];'Buddy Norris'; Wagner, Bill; 'Bob Crenshaw'; Beck, Bill; Silvis, Starr;
Wiggs, Linda; [e-mail]
Subject: Pre -Construction Meeting - Avery County C&D Landfill - Phase 3 - Cell 1 Construction
Good Afternoon:
A pre -construction meeting for the Avery County C&D Landfill — Phase 3 — Cell 1 Construction project has been
scheduled for December 4, 2009 at 10 am. We look forward to seeing you there. Please contact us with any questions or
comments.
Kind Regards,
Don Misenheimer
Richardson Smith Gardner & Associates, Inc.
14 N. Boylan Ave.
Raleigh, NC 27603
0: 919-828-0577 x141
C: 919-815-4315
F. 919-828-3899

Wagner, Bill
From: Don Misenheimer [[e-mail]]
Sent: Monday, November 30, 2009 3:32 PM
To: [e-mail]; [e-mail];'Buddy Norris;
[e-mail]
Subject: Avery County MSW Landfill - Gas System Information Meeting
Good Afternoon:
A meeting discussing the Avery County MSW Landfill Gas System has been scheduled for December 4, 2009 at 2 pm.
We look forward to seeing you there. Please contact us with any questions or comments.
Kind Regards,
Don Misenheimer
Richardson Smith Gardner & Associates, Inc.
14 N. Boylan Ave.
Raleigh, NC 27603
0: 919-828-0577 x141
C: 919-815-4315
F. 919-828-3899