4501_ROSCANS_1995

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Solid Waste Management
James B, Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
William L. Meyer, Director
October 26, 1995
Mr. David Thompson
Henderson County Manager
100 North King Street
Hendersonville, NC 28739
Re: Technical Review, Henderson County Transition Plan, Permit Number 45-01
Dear Mr. Thompson:
The NC Division of Solid Waste Management, Solid Waste Section (Section) has completed a
technical review of the engineering portion of the above referenced Transition Plan application
submitted by William G. Lapsley and Associates, on behalf of Henderson County. The section
hydrogeologist will review the Local Area Study and the Water Quality Monitoring portions of
the Transition Plan and will request any additional water monitoring information or geology
needed upon completion of his review.
The Section's engineering review involved evaluating the Henderson County Transition Plan
with respect to the North Carolina Solid Waste Management Rules (15A NCAC 13B.1600).
Based on its preliminary review, the Section needs the following additional information.
Summary Report
Pg. 2 Please be advised that according to Rule .1627(c)(3)(A) final cover side slopes must
maintain a grade between 5%-25%. The 3:1 side slopes mentioned on this page will need
to be flattened be,;.re closure.
Pg. 3 With respect to thc; County's compliance action, what is the current status of the proposed
landfill gas remediation at the site? A set of plans should be submitted to the Section for
documentation purposes.
Pg. 4 A new timetable needs to be developed with respect to the design, permitting, and
construction of a new Subtitle D landfill. Henderson County should allow 1 year for
permitting and 1 year for construction of a new lined facility.
Location Restriction Demonstration
Pg. 5 Please provide documentation from either FAA or a local aeronautical map confirming
that the landfill is in compliance with Rule .1622(2)(a).
Pg. 5 A FEMA FIRM map or comparable source showing the landfill and the 100 year
floodplain should be provided to demonstrate compliance with Rule .1622(2)(a).
P.O. Box 27687, Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 509k recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

Mr. David Thompson
October 26, 1995
Page 2
Closed Unit Documentation
Evidence of closure is required for MSWLF units which stopped receiving waste prior to
October 9, 1991. Has Henderson County provided the Section with any such
information? The Waste Management Specialist for the facility, Jim Patterson, should be
contacted with regard to this matter. Jim's phone number is [phone].
Operation Plan
The Operation Piaa should be a manual suitable for use by the 1 .._ lfill personnel. In its
current form, the plan is difficult to follow and lacking in detail. Please revise the plan
accordingly paying particular attention to the following items.
Pg. 10 How does Henderson County propose to dispose of asbestos? [.1626(1)(d)]
Pg. 10 What material is the proposed alternate daily cover constructed of?
Pg. 10 Has Henderson County's proposed alternative daily cover been approved by the Section?
Please clarify this point. [.1626(2)(b)]
Pg. 12 The random inspections of the solid waste stream must include approximately 1 % of the
waste processed at the landfill.
Pg. 13 The methane monitoring plan is incomplete. Various issues discussed in Rule .1626(4)
have not been addressed, specifically:
i) It must be ensured that the concentration of methane gas does not exceed either 25
percent of the lower explosive limit (LEL) for methane in facility structures or the
LEL at the facility property boundary. [A 626(4)(a)]
ii) If methane levels exceed the limits specified in item i above, the facility owner or
operator must:
a) Immediately take all necessary steps to protect human health and notify
the Section;
b) W; lin 7 days of place in the operating record the methane levels detected
and steps applied to insure human health; and
c) Within 60 days of detection, implement a methane gas remediation
program.
Pg. 14 Does the sedimentation and erosion control plan incorporate adequate measures to control.
surface water run-off and run-on generated from the 25 year/24 hour storm event?
[.1625(b)(3)(B)]
Pg. 14 The sedimentation and erosion control plan should be submitted to the Division of Land
Resources, Land Quality Section for approval. Please advise the Section upon approval.
Several of the topics addressed in Rule .1626 are not included in the plan. Please describe in
sufficient detail how Henderson County will respond to the following concerns:
i) Disease vector control [.1626(3)];
ii) Liquids Restriction [.1626(9)] including a discussion to both the apparatus and the
procedure for conducting the Paint Filter Liquids Test (SW 846) for the
determination of liquid waste and
iii) Spreading and compacting requirements [.1626(11)].

Mr. David Thompson
October 26, 1995
Page 3
Closure Plan
Pg. 19 More detail is required on the actual construction, technical specifications and quality
assurance/control for the cap system is requested as per Rule .1627(c)(3).
Pg. 19 The maximum 3:1 sideslopes mentioned in the plan are steeper than the 25% maximum
slope as per Rule .1627(c)(3)(A). The closure plan will need to be amended taking this
fact into account.
Pg. 20 The cap details shown on Drawing 12 are inconsistent with the text. Will there be any
areas of the closure cap that will utilize the composite geomembrane liner?
Pg. 21 The closure cap system over all waste disposed at the site after October 9, 1991 shall
conform to all of the provisions of Rule .1627(c)(1). This cap system will be used on all
sideslopes in addition to the approximately 1 acre area mentioned in the plan.
Pg. 26 The closure cost estimate will need to be amended taking into account the fact that the
low permeability liner will be carried over the sideslopes. Additionally, such factors as
the construction quality assurance (CQA) for the cap system and engineering fees need to
be considered when estimating the closure costs.
Post -Closure Plan
Pg. 28 A statement needs to be added to the plan stating that upon completion of post -closure
care, a certification signed by a registered professional engineer shall be prepared and
placed in the operating record.
What is the estimated post -closure care cost? The way in which the cost analysis data is
presented is difficult to follow. More documentation is needed to clarify this point.
Please submit revisions to the Transition Plan to the Section within the next 45 days. When
submitting revisions to the Transition Plan, the changed pages should be clearly identified with a
revision date in either the footer or the header. It is not necessary to submit five (5) copies of
revisions or facility drawings, at this time. Two (2) copies will suffice. When the Transition
Plan is finalized a total of five (5) copies will be needed. These comments are intended to
expedite the review of the referenced application, and in no way do they restrict the Section's
right to request additional information following the technical review process. If you have any
questions regarding this review, please contact me at [phone] Ext. 344.
Sincerely, ,
Gre Eades
Environmental Engineei
Solid Waste Section
cc: Julian Foscue, SWS Jim Patterson, SWS
Jan McHargue, SWS Gary Tweed, Lapsley & Associates

State of North C(-. _)lina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Solid Waste Management
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor August 2, 1995
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
William L. Meyer, Director
Ms. Nancy H. Montgomery
Kyocera Industrial Ceramics, Inc.
100 Industrial Park Road
Mountain Home, NC 28758
Subject: Disposal of Approximately One 55 Gallon Drum or Twenty Pounds of Hardened (Cured)
Epoxy Resin at the Henderson County Sanitary Landfill, (Permit # 45-01).
Dear Ms Montgomery:
The Solid Waste Management Division has received a request for characterization of the subject waste.
Based upon the submitted information, the waste appears to be non -hazardous. The Solid Waste Management
Division has no objection to the sanitary landfill disposal of this waste, if in accordance with the conditions
listed below:
1. The owner/operator of the landfill approves the disposal.
2. The waste contains no free liquids and can be confined, compacted, and covered in accordance
with the Solid Waste Management Rules (15A NCAC 13B).
3. The waste is removed from the drums ( if possible) before disposal. Otherwise:
4. If the waste is delivered in drums and the drums have to be disposed, they will be perforated
with small holes prior to delivery to ensure that no liquids are present.
5. Renewal of this approval will require resubmittal of a Waste Determination Form and current
supportive analytical data. Renewal is required prior to subsequent disposal if the process
generating the waste changes or if the waste composition changes significantly.
Failure to meet these conditions may result in revocation of this approval, and subsequently, an
administrative penalty. The approval is subject to change if new rules and/or regulations were to prohibit this
practice. If the process which generates the waste changes or if the composition of the waste changes
significantly, this approval is void and re-evaluation of the waste will be required prior to subsequent disposal.
If you have further questions or comments concerning this matter, please contact this office at [phone].
Sincerely,
William R. Hocutt
Waste Determination Coordinator
Solid Waste Section
cc: Jim Patterson
Gary Corn
P.O. Box 27687, Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

MLhs 9=edum will be used by the Solid Waste Management Division to de�
wiether a wc-ot is (1) hazardous as defined by 15A NCAC 13A, and (2) suitable for
disposal at a solid waste management facility. rn-je types of wastes that will be
evaluated by this procedure are primarily, but not exclusively, industrial and
ccmercial wastes and sludges, and Publicly Owned Treatment Works Sludges.
Ue Solid Waste Management Division reserves the riot to request additional
information or waive some of the requixemients based on the type of waste if it deems
necessary. The Division may also require some wastes to be treated or altered to renter
the wastes awiramentally ii1e prior to disposal at a sanitary landfill. Was
dim at sanitary landfills must be non -liquid which can be properly managed in
accordance with the "solid Waste Manag�t Riles1°. AppRWAL TO DISPOSE OF THE
SHALL ALA EE OBTAINED FMX TEE Cat CP, OPE RATM OF THE I ANDFILL PRIM TO DISPOSAL.
The folludinq information is required for an evaluation. Incomplete waste
dete inati.on forms will be retur eed to the generator without review. An asterisk(*)
denotes information required for Publicly Owned Treatment Works.
A *.GENERAL TICK
1. Name, ' MTHON ' N[MMEM and mailing address of facility or person ge vacating waste
Kyocera Industrial Ceramics Corporation
P. O. Box 678
Mountain Home, NC 28758
2. Specific location of waste (i.e. SR., county, city, etc...)
100 industrial Park Road, Henderson County, Mountain Home, NC
3. Wzt is the waste? Epoxy waste
4. What Volume Of di ll Will there be? (1) 55 gal. drum or 20 lb.
5. 6iat frequency of disposal Will there be? monthly
6. E 1ai.n either the manufacturing ng process Or how the waste was generated.
(5) different materials are mixed together to produce the epoxy
B INFOFd4A9TON FOR HAZARDCUS (RQ2A) UPEERNDMON (15A N.C. Admire. Code 13A .0006)
1- Is the waste listed under .0006(d) (i.e., 40 CFR 261.30 - 261.33)? If yes, list
number. No
*2. Does the wa_s ee exhibit arcs of the f� d1aracterisUcs as defined by 15A N.C.
Admin. Oode 13A .0006(c) (i.e., 40 CFR 261.20-261.24)? (Attach laboratory results
for 1C Toxicity, Reactivity, Ignitability, CbrroSivity.) No
C INFOF40=N FOR LANDFII J TNG EEaERMINATION
I. Does the waste contain any hazardous waste constituents listed in 15A N.C. Admire.
Code 13A .0006(e), Appendix V.Lu (i.e., 40 CFR 261, Appendix VIII)? If yes, what
em-tithieants and what ccnoerntratio n? (Attach laboratory results)
No - see lab result attached
2. hiat othex constituents are present and in what concentration?
(Attach laboratory results) None
3. Will the handling and disposal of this waste create dust emissions which may
cause a health hazard or rxLi_sanoe to landfill Personnel. No
*4. Does the waste pass the "paint filter' test for free liquids (Method 9 995 in
S.W. 846)? (Attach laboratory results) yes -lab results attached
*5. Which solid waves management facility is the request for (name of landfill
and perMit MMber, incinerator, etc...)? Henderson County Landfill, Permit#4501
'specify has the waste will be delivered - in bulk or corntaineers (i.e.
Urals, bags, etc.) In bulk (dumpster) if acceptable with State/Landfill

Following are the maximom leachable (=P) c ntamination levels and pH for solid
ante dual. in N.C. landfills. Primary N.C. drink' M water and Federal hazardous
limits are included for ocgaarlson. Ciheaical analysis is required at detection limits
rnrm;ttiig assessment at or below the maxu= landfill levels. Individual pH values
must be >2.0 and <12.5; average values accepted are normally 4.0 - 10.0
The 90)en mtar is bible to deter if their waste meets N.C. landfill
acceptable levels. Analysis for herbicides, pesticides and organics NiJb"I' BE PERFORMED
VMMM F0 MIS: M OF TM WASTE NAEES THEIR MNENM A POSSIBI T*rv. leachable metals
must alumys be d emobbed. Tom,; rp if any questions exist on interpretation.
NC DRINKING NC landfill
METALSILL
EPA HAZARDOUS
WATER MCL
MAXIMUM
ARSENIC
(va/LI
5.0
(RRM
0.05
(m4/LI
0.50
BARIUM
100.0
1.00
10.DO
CADMIUM
CHROMIUM
1.0
0.01
0.10
5.0
0.05
0.50
LEAD
MERCURY
5.0
0.05
0.50
SELENIUM
0.2
0.002
0.02
SILVER
1.0
0.01
010
5.0
0.05
0..50
I�RBI�Il2FS 6 PESTICIDF,�
CHLORDANE
0.03
0.003
ENDRIN
0.02
0.0002
0.002
HEPTACHLOR
0.008
-
0.0008
LINDANE
0.40
0.004
0.04
METHOXYCHLOR
10.00
0.10
1.00
TOXAPHENE
0.50
0.005
0.05
2,4-D
10.00
0.10
1.00
2,4 5-TP SILVER
1.00
0.01
0.10
ORGANICS
BENZENE
0.5
0.005
0.05
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
0.5
0.005
0.05
CHLOROBENZENE
100.0
-
10
CHLOROFORM
6.0
-
0.60
0-CRESOL
200.0
-
20
M-CRESOL
200.0
-
Y0
P-CRESOL
200.0
-
20
1,4 DICHLOROBENZENE
7.5
0.075
0.75
1,2 DICEL,OROETHANE
0.5
0.005
0.05
1,1 DICHLOROETHYI"E
0.7
0.007
0.07
2,4 DINITROMWENE
0.13
-
0.013
HEXACHLOROBENZENE
0.13
-
0.013
HEXACHLORO-I,3-BUTADIENE
0.5
-
0.05
HEXACHLOROETHANE
3.0
-
0.30
METHYL ETHYL KETONE
200.0
-
Y0
NITROBENZENE
2.0
-
0.20
PENTACHLOROPHENOL
100.0
-
10
PYRIDINE
5.0
-
0.50
TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
0.7
-
0.07
TRICHLOROETHYLENE
0.5
0.005
0.05
2,4,5-TRICHLOROPHENOL
400.0
-
2,4,6-TRICHLOROPHONOL
2.0
-
40
VINYL CHLORIDE
0.2
0.002
0.20
0.02
"I hereby certify that the information sul nitted in regard to epoxy waste
(name of waste) is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief."
(pril'lt naMe) Nancy H. Montgomery
(51gnab-ze) !;t
(title) Envi onmental Coordinator
(date) 6-28-95
All QuestiorLs ccn erning this "Procedure" should be directed to the Solid Waste
Section at [phone]. Answer specific questions in space provided. Attach
additional sheets if necessary.
Cagplete all information, sign, and submit to:
Solid Waste Management Division; Solid Waste Section
P.O. Box 27687; Raleigh, NC 27611
Attn: Waste Determination
DEHN2 Fbrm 3151 SWS REV. 2/15/92
I

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural ResourcesAT4 • •
Division of Solid Waste Management
James B, Hunt, Governor p E H N F=1
Jonathan B, Howes, Secretary
William L. Meyer, Director
September 26, 1995
Mr. Gary Tweed
William G. Lapsley & Associates
1635 Asheville Highway
Hendersonville, N.C. 28739
RE: Hydrogeologic Review Of The Local Area Study And Water Quality
Monitoring Plan Of The Transition Plan For The Henderson
County Landfill (Permit # 45-01)
Dear Mr. Tweed,
The Solid Waste Section Hydrogeologic Unit has reviewed the Local
Area Study and Water Quality Monitoring Plan portions of the
Transition Plan for the Henderson.County Landfill. There are some
items that need additional clarification. Please address the
following questions and comments:
LOCAL AREA STUDY
There was no text in the report that addressed the Local Area Study
requirements. The Local Characterization Study Drawing (Sheet 7)
did not clearly provide all the information required by Rule
.1629 (b) (2) (A) (i) through (v) .
(i): Sheet 7 shows little topographic information for the
area around the landfill. It does not appear to show current
topographic information for the permitted facility.
(ii): Additional information is needed on ground and surface
water intakes in the vicinity of the landfill. A number of
the residences on Sheet 7 do not appear to be located near a
water line, yet they are not shown to be using private wells.
If these residences are assumed to be using wells, this should
be indicated on the margin of the drawing. Are there any
surface water intakes in the study area?
- (iii) Are there any underground utility lines other than the
water lines and sewer lines shown of Sheet 7?
P.O. Box 27687, Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

Mr. Gary Tweed
Henderson Transition Plan
Page 2
(v) Are there any known or potential sources of contamination
in the study area?
The on -site survey control benchmarks should also be shown on
a facility map.
WATER QUALITY MONITORING PLAN
- The text and drawings of the Water Quality Monitoring Plan
need to reflect the revised upgraded monitoring system that
was actually installed at the landfill.
Clarification is needed on the location of the four surface
water sampling locations that have been sampled in the past.
Surface water sampling is required to be done at the same time
(semi-annually) and for the same parameters as the ground-
water samples.
Rule .1623 (b) (3) (C) requires certification of the water
quality monitoring system by a Licensed Geologist rather than
a Professional Engineer.
SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS PLAN
Some of the proposed analytical methods and PQLs are
inconsistent with the guidelines established by the Solid
Waste Section as outlined in the memos to MSWLF Owners and
Operators dated June 24, 1994 and January 15, 1995.
Regular ICP method 6010 is not approved for low-level analysis
for the following metals: Antimony, Beryllium, Chromium,
Cobalt, Silver, Thallium, and Vanadium.
- The proposed PQLs are too high for Barium, Beryllium, Cadmium,
and Nickel.
Overall the Sampling and Analysis Plan appeared very good. Should
there be any discrepancies between the plan and the Solid Waste
Management Rules and policies, then the rules and policies are to
take precedence.

Mr. Gary Tweed
Henderson Transition Plan
Page 3
INITIAL SAMPLING RESULTS
- No Well Completion Records or boring logs have been submitted
for the new monitoring wells.
- No information on the in -situ hydraulic conductivity,
porosity, and effective porosity has been provided for each of
the monitoring wells in the approved monitoring system.
No information on the rate and direction of ground -water flow
has been provided for each monitoring well sampled.
- The laboratory data sheets do not indicate the analytical
methods used for the analyses.
The Solid Waste Section has received water quality sampling data
for sampling episodes for December 5, 1994 and January 31, 1995.
We have not received data for the third and fourth sampling events
that make up the baseline sampling event. This data was required
to be reported to the Solid Waste Section on or before April 9,
1995. Henderson County needs to submit this data immediately.
Although the complete baseline sampling report has not been
received, the data from the first two sampling events indicates
that the N.C. Groundwater Standards have been exceeded for several
parameters. Therefore Henderson County should have sampled the
monitoring wells for the Appendix II constituent list on or before
July 9, 1995.
If you or Henderson County have any questions regarding this
letter, please contact me at [phone], extension 258. Please
provide a response to this letter as soon as possible, so the Solid
Waste Section can complete its technical review of the Henderson
County Transition Plan.
Sincerely, Ar
Bobby Lutfy, Hydrogeologist
Solid Waste Section
CC: Ed Mussler, Solid Waste Section
Jim Patter`son'SWS - Asheville
David Thompson, Henderson County

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources Aug •
Division of Solid Waste Management
James B, Hunt, Jr., Governor � C � � F1
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary C
William L. Meyer, Director
October 26, 1995
Mr. David Thompson
Henderson County Manager OCT 1995
100 North King Street S ECE/{/E�
Hendersonville, NC 28739'fko v
ti
Re: Technical Review, Henderson County Transition Plan, Permit Number 45=O1 _: 9L qt vx,�"�
Dear Mr. Thompson:
The NC Division of Solid Waste Management, Solid Waste Section (Section) has completed a
technical review of the engineering portion of the above referenced Transition Plan application
submitted by William G. Lapsley and Associates, on behalf of Henderson County. The section
hydrogeologist will review the Local Area Study and the Water Quality Monitoring portions of
the Transition Plan and will request any additional water monitoring information or geology
needed upon completion of his review.
The Section's engineering review involved evaluating the Henderson County Transition Plan
with respect to the North Carolina Solid Waste Management Rules (15A NCAC 13B.1600).
Based on its preliminary review, the Section needs the following additional information.
Summary Report
Pg. 2 Please be advised that according to Rule .1627(c)(3)(A) final cover side slopes must
maintain a grade between 5%-25%. The 3:1 side slopes mentioned on this page will need
to be flattened be,:0re closure.
Pg. 3 With respect to th,: County's compliance action, what is the current status of the proposed
landfill gas remediation at the site? A set of plans should be submitted to the Section for
documentation purposes.
Pg. 4 A new timetable needs to be developed with respect to the design, permitting, and
construction of a new Subtitle D landfill. Henderson County should allow 1 year for
permitting and 1 year for construction of a new lined facility.
Location Restriction Demonstration
Pg. 5 Please provide documentation from either FAA or a local aeronautical map confirming
that the landfill is in compliance with Rule .1622(2)(a).
Pg. 5 A FEMA FIRM map or comparable source showing the landfill and the 100 year
floodplain should be provided to demonstrate compliance with Rule .1622(2)(a).
P.O. Box 27687, Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50%recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

Mr. David Thompson
October 26, 1995
Page 2
Closed Unit Documentation
Evidence of closure is required for MSWLF units which stopped receiving waste prior to
October 9, 1991. Has Henderson County provided the Section with any such
information? The Waste Management Specialist for the facility, Jim Patterson, should be
contacted with regard to this matter. Jim's phone number is [phone].
Operation Plan
The Operation Pla should be a manual suitable for use by the la.--., lfill personnel. In its
current form, the plan is difficult to follow and lacking in detail. Please revise the plan
accordingly paying particular attention to the following items.
Pg. 10 How does Henderson County propose to dispose of asbestos? [.1626(l)(d)]
Pg. 10 What material is the proposed alternate daily cover constructed of?
Pg. 10 Has Henderson County's proposed alternative daily cover been approved by the Section?
Please clarify this point. [.1626(2)(b)]
Pg. 12 The random inspections of the solid waste stream must include approximately 1% of the
waste processed at the landfill.
Pg. 13 The methane monitoring plan is incomplete. Various issues discussed in Rule .1626(4)
have not been addressed, specifically:
i) It must be ensured that the concentration of methane gas does not exceed either 25
percent of the lower explosive limit (LEL) for methane in facility structures or the
LEL at the facility property boundary. [.1626(4)(a)]
ii) If methane levels exceed the limits specified in item i above, the facility owner or
operator must:
a) Immediately take all necessary steps to protect human health and notify
the Section;
b) Wi-.nin 7 days of place in the operating record the methane levels detected
and steps applied to insure human health; and
c) Within 60 days of detection, implement a methane gas remediation
program.
Pg. 14 Does the sedimentation and erosion control plan incorporate adequate measures to control.
surface water run-off and run-on generated from the 25 year/24 hour storm event?
[.1625(b)(3)(B)]
Pg. 14 The sedimentation and erosion control plan should be submitted to the Division of Land
Resources, Land Quality Section for approval. Please advise the Section upon approval.
Several of the topics addressed in Rule .1626 are not included in the plan. Please describe in
sufficient detail how Henderson County will respond to the following concerns:
i) Disease vector control [.1626(3)];
ii) Liquids Restriction [.1626(9)] including a discussion to both the apparatus and the
procedure for conducting the Paint Filter Liquids Test (SW 846) for the
determination of liquid waste and
iii) Spreading and compacting requirements [.1626(11)].

Mr. David Thompson
October 26, 1995
Page 3
Closure Plan
Pg. 19 More detail is required on the actual construction, technical specifications and quality
assurance/control for the cap system is requested as per Rule .1627(c)(3).
Pg. 19 The maximum 3:1 sideslopes mentioned in the plan are steeper than the 25% maximum
slope as per Rule .1627(c)(3)(A). The closure plan will need to be amended taking this
fact into account.
Pg. 20 The cap details shown on Drawing 12 are inconsistent with the text. Will there be any
areas of the closure cap that will utilize the composite geomembrane liner?
Pg. 21 The closure cap system over all waste disposed at the site after October 9, 1991 shall
conform to all of the provisions of Rule .1627(c)(1). This cap system will be used on all
sideslopes in addition to the approximately 1 acre area mentioned in the plan.
Pg. 26 The closure cost estimate will need to be amended taking into account the fact that the
low permeability liner will be carried over the sideslopes. Additionally, such factors as
the construction quality assurance (CQA) for the cap system and engineering fees need to
be considered when estimating the closure costs.
Post -Closure Plan
Pg. 28 A statement needs to be added to the plan stating that upon completion of post -closure
care, a certification signed by a registered professional engineer shall be prepared and
placed in the operating record.
What is the estimated post -closure care cost? The way in which the cost analysis data is
presented is difficult to follow. More documentation is needed to clarify this point.
Please submit revisions to the Transition Plan to the Section within the next 45 days. When
submitting revisions to the Transition Plan, the changed pages should be clearly identified with a
revision date in either the footer or the header. It is not necessary to submit five (5) copies of
revisions or facility drawings, at this time. Two (2) copies will suffice. When the Transition
Plan is finalized a total of five (5) copies will be needed. These comments are intended to
expedite the review of the referenced application, and in no way do they restrict the Section's
right to request additional information following the technical review process. If you have any
questions regarding this review, please contact me at [phone] Ext. 344.
Sincerely, ,
Gre Eades
Environmental Engineei
Solid Waste Section
cc: ' Julian Foscue, SWS Jim Patterson, SWS
Jan McHargue, SWS Gary Tweed, Lapsley & Associates

ELDON OWEN
SOLID WASTE DIRECTOR
697-4505
DATE
TIME
r ROM :
CONCERNING:
��NOEPSON CpVNTy
bN '
1,
a:
\OUNnsn A a,a/
HENDERSON COUNTY
SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT
802 Stoney Mountain Road
Hendersonville, NC 28739
COVER PAGE/FAX TRANSMITTAL
FAX [phone]
FAX NO.
This facsimilie consists of:
age(s)
including this cover sheet
NIPPY PAGE
INTEGRATED
SOLID WASTE PLANNER
697-4877

34-09-1995 12*226P'11 FROM R190ma TO
CARGAN RESOURCES, INC:.
17046915599 F.02
4/9/95
Report on effects of three days acti<re gas migration
control at northern perimeter of Stoney Mouniain Road Landfill
Henderson County, NC
Monitor Weil: HENWPO 5 (monitor wall eat Tiev.A boundary)
y �
Date. Cas at.
4/7/95 CH4 3131/95
02 18.9
CO2 0
M gas 81.1
Monitor Well:
DDCT 6
4/7/95
CH4
0
02
17
002
1.9
BEd gas
81-1
Monitor Well:
UOCT 5
4/7195
CH4
7.4
02
6.2
C>-/.S
002
21.7
3 a . q
€leaf gas
64.7
55, /
Monitor Well:
QOCT 4
Date
OLUL
X
4/7195
CH4
45.4
y '
02
0
CO2
4f .4
4q , I
EW gas
13.2
i D �)b
Daik
3131/95
Date
3/31 /95
EWE
3131 /95
Saar..
CH4
02
002
Bal gas
CH4
02
002
Bel gas
clas-
CH4
02
CO2
-
CH4
02
002
YQ
553
0
44.7
0
YQ
0
175
2.1
80.4
0
16.9
2.1
81
Ya
5fl
0
47.3
2.5

04-a8-1995
12:2GP!l
PROM Algoma
T7_1
P.03
Moriltor Well:
DOCT 3
r
r
4
CH4
23.5
I (o. (�
�%95
CH4
46.3
Cat
5.8
02
0.1
�
4Q7.4
Be]02
Be] gas
�3j11.2
39.5
(���CO2
� gas
6.2
Monitor Well:
DOCT 2
A
O
.3
4J7J95
CH4
39.2
60,71
3/31 95
CH4
613
02
0.7
) (¢
02
0.2
002
36.9
q 3 ,1
CO2
48.5
Bel gas
23-2
u - (�
EW gas
0
Monitor Well:
DOCT l
120ta
1
l y. 9
Date
Gas-
Y
417195
CH4
26.7
3/31 /95
CH4
48.3
02
5
02
1.9
CO2
28
`�
CO2
46.2
Bal gas
40.3
(--I
Bal gas
3.6
Lt
TOTAL P.03

SECTION 1 OPERATION PLAN
Section 1.1 Description of Existing Operation
The existing Henderson County Landfill is located in the
North Central part of Henderson County on Stoney Mountain
Road. The County has approximately 120 acres at this site
with approximately 60 acres being utilized for the landfill.
The remaining property is serving as buffer, borrow soils
area, animal shelter, and maintenance buildings. Enclosed
with this Transition Report is a set of plans which cover the
existing and planned phases of the landfill operation.
Drawing sheet No. 1 depicts the 1993 site plan of the current
landfill operation with contours as of the fall 1993.
Henderson County has made it a practice to have aerial
topography mapping conducted of the landfill each Fall for the
past several years. This has allowed the County to track the
rate of fill by comparison of contour maps from one year to
the next. Drawing sheet No. 1 depicts the existing contour
levels as of the Fall of 1993. This drawing also identifies
location of the various aspects of the landfill operation.
The current active landfill area is being operated as an
open face landfill utilizing on site soils for berm
construction. Approximately 200 to 300 tons per day of solid
waste is being disposed in the active portion of the site. The
working face size varies on a daily basis, and is
approximately 10,000 square feet (1/4 acre). The County also
SECTION 1 OPERATION PLAN 1

holds a permit, obtained in 1991, for a demolition disposal
area. This demolition area is not being heavily utilized due
to unavailable County personnel to police the demolition
disposal area sufficient to prevent unauthorized material from
being deposited in the demolition area. Currently the site is
being operated with all waste other than recyclable materials,
white goods, prohibited materials, and yard waste being
disposed of in the solid waste landfill. The site contains a
recycling center and the County is providing a very aggressive
recycling program including the development of a materials
recovery facility. The County purchased a tub grinder which
is aiding in the disposal of yard and wood waste. The use of
the tub grinder has resulted in a significant reduction of
solid waste being disposed of in the landfill. Mulch
generated by the tub grinder is being sold by the County.
In the Spring of 1993, a site utilization study was
conducted of the existing landfill operation. Several
recommended changes to the operation were made including the
use of an alternate daily cover versus on site soils and the
return to the 1982 permitted contours utilizing air space
above the recycling center and haul road. In 1986 a change
was made to the landfill operation locating the haul road and
recycling center within the base of the landfill operation.
This resulted in a loss of air space based on the 1982
approved contour levels. The County is currently returning to
these 1982 contours utilizing the air space above the
SECTION 1 OPERATION PLAN 2

recycling center and haul road. Also a polyvinyl tarp type
alternate daily cover is being used to reduce space lost due
to soil daily cover.
The daily operational routine consists of
building berms with on site soils, receiving waste into the
berm area, compacting solid waste with a mechanical compactor,
and providing daily cover with tarp. Occasional soil daily
cover is used during wet periods or extended periods where
landfill is closed. The current permitted top elevation of
the landfill is at elevation 2410 and the current fill
elevation is at approximately of 2350. There is approximately
a 10 acre area on top of the current fill and a 10 acre area
on the west slope of the fill which is scheduled to receive
additional solid waste. Filling of these two areas is
expected to take until late 1997 at which time the permitted
contours with top elevation of 2410 will have been obtained
and the landfill closed and capped. The County was pursuing
the development of a new landfill site but has chosen to look
at trucking the slid waste outside of Henderson County in the
future. It is expected to have in place within the next year
a contract for handling the County's solid waste once the
landfill is closed. The set of plans attached with this report
has been prepared to serve as the operational drawings and
additional required drawings for the Transition Plan in
accordance with T15A: 13B.1600.
The County is in the process of developing a landfill gas
SECTION 1 OPERATION PLAN 3

collection and disposal system. The County contracted with
Cargan Resources to conduct a Phase I Landfill Gas Remediation
Plan. This Phase I Plan was completed and the County is
entering into Phase II which will lead to the operation of a
landfill gas collection and disposal system. Drawing No. 9
depicts the landfill gas collection and disposal system which
is currently under construction. A temporary flare station
and collection well system was installed during early 1995 to
remediate the off site gas migration situation at the top of
the landfill. This system has been in operation since May
1995 and has successfully stopped the off site migration.
Section 1.2 Operation Report
The Transition Plan has been developed with a set of
drawings to cover the existing and planned continued operation
of the Stoney Mountain Road Landfill. The drawings have been
developed to show the existing site and phase of operation as
of the Fall 1993 (Sheet No. 1). Sheet No. 2 is the expected
phase of the operation with fill contours by the end of 1994.
Sheet No. 3 is the expected phase of the operation with fill
contours by the end of 1995. Sheet No. 4 is the expected
phase of the operation with fill contours by the end of 1996.
Sheet No. 5 is the expected phase of the operation with the
final contours to be established by the end of 1997. Sheet
No. 6 is the closure plan which depicts those areas requiring
the required cap system under Rule .1627. Drawing No. 7 is
SECTION 1 OPERATION PLAN 4
REVISED 11-28-95

the Local Characterization Study required as part of the
Closure Plan showing the area around the landfill to at least
2,000 feet from the current property boundary. Drawing No. 8
is the Water Quality Monitoring Plan showing existing and
proposed ground water monitoring wells and surface water
quality monitoring locations. Drawing No. 9 depicts the
landfill gas collection and disposal system. Drawings No. 10,
11, and 12 are details of landfill cross sections, erosion
control, and cap system.
The Henderson County landfill is operated in accordance
with Rule .1626 which defines operational requirements. The
County accepts only wastes for which it is permitted and
prohibits hazardous waste, polychlorinated biphenyls (PCB),
and liquid waste. Spoiled foods, animal carcasses, abattoir
waste, hatchery waste, and other animal waste when received is
covered immediately. A separate area has been maintained for
asbestos disposal (see sheet 1). This area is inactive since
the County has not received any asbestos waste for some time.
Wastewater treatment plant sludges are not accepted at the
landfill. The County provides an entrance gate at the scale
operation with personnel to monitor incoming loads. Waste is
placed within the base area of the current permit and provided
with daily cover of either 6 inches of soil or alternate
polyvinyl tarp. A request for approval of the alternative
polyvinyl tarp was requested of the Division by letter dated
April 26, 1993 to use an alternative polyvinyl (Fabrisol) tarp
SECTION 1 OPERATION PLAN 5
REVISED 11-25-95

cover. The Division did not respond to this request and the
County advised by letter dated October 6, 1993 that they were
beginning the use of the tarp cover. This has been in
practice for the past two years and has operated successfully.
The County is pursuing the installation of landfill gas
collection and disposal equipment necessary for compliance
with landfill gas requirements. A perimeter monitoring gas
well system is in place and shown on drawing No. 9. The site
is fenced with access control through a main gate and scale
operation.
No open burning of solid waste is allowed at the
landfill. Access and haul roads are being maintained to
minimize erosion and dust pollution. A series of sediment
basins are utilized on site to provide erosion control. All
drainage from the disturbed areas is routed through one or
more sediment basins and the sediment basins are periodically
cleaned by dredging collected sediments. Seeding of disturbed
areas is provided where necessary to control site erosion.
All sedimentation and erosion control measures have been
previously approved by the Division of Land Resources.
The County does not allow the disposal of liquids at the
landfill, and waste oil collection is provided at the
recycling center. The current landfill is not lined and does
not have a leachate collection system. Based on results of
surface water and ground water monitoring, there is little
evidence of any leachate contamination from this facility.
SECTION 1 OPERATION PLAN 6
REVISED 11-28-95

The proposed landfill gas collection and disposal system will
generate some condensate, estimated at a few hundred gallons
per month. It is planned to dispose of the condensate by
either atomizing the liquid into the gas disposal flare or
connection to area sanitary sewer system.
The landfill operators are maintaining operational
records including scale information, inspection records, gas
monitoring results, water quality monitoring results, and
operational engineering drawings. The office at the landfill
is equipped with computerized word processing and staffing
such that day to day operations and correspondences can be
handled by landfill staff.
Section 1.3 Facility Programs
The Henderson County Stoney Mountain Road Landfill has in
place facility programs for detecting and preventing the
disposal of hazardous and liquid wastes. The County has three
certified Solid Waste Enforcement Officers which have received
training and certification by the Solid Waste Association of
North America. The State of North Carolina currently does not
have a certification program; however, the above certification
is recognized by the N.C. Division of Solid Waste Management.
The County currently performs random inspections of incoming
loads at a frequency of one day per month which exceeds the
requirement of inspecting at least 1% of the waste processed
SECTION 1 OPERATION PLAN 7
REVISED 1 i -28-95

at the landfill. Loads are inspected by having hauler unload
in an area separate from the active working face and County
personnel visually inspect the load for hazardous and liquid
wastes. Inspection forms are completed following each load
inspection and kept on file.
In addition to the Solid Waste Association of North
America certification program, County Solid Waste personnel
are allowed to attend various training seminars as they are
available. The use of the SWANA certification and local
seminars has been adequate in training County staff to
recognize and manage any hazardous and liquid wastes.
In the event the landfill receives any hazardous or
liquid wastes the County has a contingency plan to properly
manage these wastes. If the generator of the hazardous or
liquid wastes can be identified, they are contacted to remove
these wastes from the landfill for proper disposal. Where
identification of generator can not be made, identified
hazardous and liquid wastes are collected, stored in weather
proof containers, and arrangements made to ship wastes to
proper disposal facilities.
Henderson County is currently using an alternative daily
cover, consisting of a polyvinyl tarp type material. By not
using the six inches of soil for daily cover the County is
saving approximately 185 cy of space per day. This is
extending the life of the current site, and use of the
alternative cover is working very well.
SECTION 1 OPERATION PLAN 8
REVISED 1i-z'

Henderson County is also involved in landfill gas
management. During 1993 a Phase I Landfill Gas Remediation
Study was undertaken by contract to Cargan Resources, Inc.
This Company specializes in landfill gas management. A series
of gas monitoring wells were installed at the perimeter of the
landfill and monitored for various landfill gas parameters.
With this data, a landfill gas collection and monitoring
system was designed and is currently under construction.
Disposal of the gas is by flaring, and it is planned to study
possible use of the gas as alternative fuels. Drawing No. 9
depicts the landfill gas collection, flaring, and monitoring
system. Monitoring of the landfill gas perimeter wells is
continuing with weekly testing. Data collected from these gas
wells is kept on file at the facility. These wells are be
monitored for the following:
% LEL Lower Explosive Limit
% CH4 Methane
% 02 Oxygen
o CO2 Carbon Dioxide
% Balance Gases
Barometric Pressure
All on site buildings are monitored to insure that the
methane levels do not exceed 25% of the LEL and perimeter gas
monitoring wells are check to insure no off site migration.
Currently all structures and wells are sampled weekly with
SECTION 1 OPERATION PLAN 9
REVISED 11-28-95

sampling results being kept on file at the landfill office.
Should methane levels be detected in the structures or
migrating off site then the County will immediately notify the
Division and take steps necessary to protect human health.
Within 7 days the County will place in the operating recorded
the methane levels detected and the steps applied to insure
human health, and within 60 days of detection, implement a
methane gas remediation program.
Should the weekly monitoring not detect any areas of
concern, then frequency could be reduced to once per month.
By use of soil and tarp daily cover operations the site
is not experience any problems with disease vector control.
Liquid wastes are not allowed for disposal in the landfill.
The Paint Filter Liquids Test (SW 846) will be use should the
County encounter liquid wastes. Currently the County is not
having any problems with liquid waste disposal. The County
utilizes a mechanical compactor on a small working face area.
The working face is kept to approximately 1/4 acre to maximize
compaction and utilization of space. All windblown material is
collected and returned to the active fill area at the end of
each day.
Section 1.4 Sedimentation and Erosion Control
The existing site sedimentation and erosion control is
handled through a series of sedimentation basins along the
streams and drainage ways of the site. Drawing No. 1 shows
the site plan as of the Fall of 1993 with location of the
SECTION 1 OPERATION PLAN :DEVISED 1 ; ��'-<) J 10

existing sedimentation basins. The sedimentation basins are
periodically cleaned of accumulated sediments. Disturbed
areas and landfill slopes are being seeded following active
work. This seeding and use of the sedimentation basins are
providing effective erosion control for the site. An
additional sedimentation basin was approved by the Division of
Land Resources and constructed on the South side of the
landfill. Once the landfill is closed and stabilized, a
determination will be made as to which sedimentation basins
will remain in use.
Section 1.5 Remaining Site Capacity
During 1993 Henderson County had a Site Utilization Study
conducted of the Stoney Mountain Road Landfill. This study
estimated that the site had the potential to remain open until
early 1998, with certain operational modifications to the
site. The current landfill Rules requires sites to be closed
by January 1, 1998 and it is felt that with good operational
controls at the site the Stoney Mountain Road Landfill can
remain open until late 1997.
During the Fall of 1993, an aerial photograph was taken
of the landfill to produce a current topographic map of the
site. The County has made it a practice to prepare aerial
topo maps each year for the past few years. From 1991 to 1992
the site change in topography of the site indicated that the
site volume of fill to be in the order of 400,000 cubic yards.
This includes solid waste and soils used for berm construction
SECTION 1 OPERATION PLAN 11
REVISED 11-25-95

and daily cover. Waste compaction was low, estimated at 585
lb/cy. With use of an alternate daily cover and increased
compaction to 900 lb/cy, it was estimated that annual fill
rate could be reduced to 250,000 to 300,000 cubic yards.
The 1993 aerial topography map when compared to the 1992
aerial topography map indicates that the annual fill rate for
1992 to 1993 was approximately 150,000 cubic yards. This
reduction has been achieved by increasing compaction to
approximately 1,000 lbs/cy, use of the tub grinder to handle
wood waste, and a reduction of wastef low from 300 tons per day
to 200 tons per day. At this rate of fill, it is estimated
that the site will have a remaining site capacity of
approximately 4 to 5 years until 1998.
Section 1.6 Areas which stopped receiving waste prior to 10-9-91.
Drawing No. 6 of the enclosed set of plans depicts the areas
which stopped receiving waste prior to October 9, 1991. Since
the Stoney Mountain Road Landfill is one large mountain type
fill with common base, the cap will be common to all areas.
It is planned to bring the fill at a 3 to 1 side slope to a
cap area of approximately one acre. This one acre area will
be required to meet certain closure and cap requirements.
SECTION 1 OPERATION PLAN 12

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Asheville Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B, Howes, Secretary
Nann B, Guthrie, Regional Manager
LETTER OF APPROVAL
August 9, 1994
Mr. David Thompson
Henderson Co. Manager
100 N. King Street
Hendersonville, NC 28739
Dear Mr. Thompson:
AUG 1994
�Y
This office has reviewed the erosion and sedimentation control plan submitted for the project
listed below. We find the plan to be acceptable and hereby issue this Letter of Approval with
modifications and/or performance reservations. A list of the modifications required and/or
reservations is attached. This approval is conditioned upon the incorporation or addition of these
items to the plan. Please be advised that Title 15A, North Carolina Administrative Code
413.0017(a), requires that a copy of the approved soil erosion control plan be on file at the job site.
Also, you should consider this letter to give the Notice required by NCGS §113A-61(d) of our
right of periodic inspection to ensure compliance with the approved plan.
The State's Sedimentation Pollution Control Program is a performance -oriented program
requiring protection of the natural resources and adjoining properties. If, following commencement
of this project, it is determined that the plan is inadequate to meet the requirements of NCGS
§ 113A-51 to 66, this office may require revisions to the plan and implementation of the revisions
to ensure compliance with the Act.
Please note that this approval is based in part on the accuracy of the information provided in
the Financial Responsibility Form which you have provided. You are requested to file an amended
form if there is any change in the information included on the form. In addition, it would be
helpful if you notify this office of the proposed starting date for this project. Your cooperation
is appreciated. -
Sincerely,
DG/rGary
cc: Tweed
Project name: Stoney Mtn. Road Landfill
Location: Henderson County
Date received: 7/28/94
New submittal (✓ ) Revision ( )
Dennis G. Owenby
Asst. Regional Engineer
Interchange Building, 59 Woodfin Place, Asheville, N.C. 28801 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

cz O
rA
o aP
o
.O O GA 'd
V
m u
CAR
a
a
x a� .` :z N
O o

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources • •
Division of Environmental Management
James B, Hunt, Jr„ Governor IL
� �
Jonathan B, Howes, Secretary
Nann B. Guthrie, Regional Manager
Asheville Regional Office
DIVISION OF SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT
SOLID WASTE SECTION
June 28, 1995
Mr. David Thompson
Henderson County Manager
100 North King Street R�c��
Hendersonville, NC 28739 SAS•
RE: Notice of Violation Compliance Inspection at
Henderson County Landfill (Permit No. 45-01)
Henderson County - Facility
Dear Mr. Thompson:
Based on my inspection of May 2, 1995, and information recently provided to me by Nippy
Page concerning methane gas concentrations on the Trace property, the Henderson County
Landfill is now in compliance with 15A North Carolina Administrative Code 13B .1626(4)
(a)(ii)•
We appreciate your efforts towards resolving this problem.
cerely,
James E. Patterson
Waste Management Specialist
JEP: sb
cc: Julian Foscue
Phil Prete
Nippy Page
Eldon Owen
Interchange Building, 59 Woodfin Place, Asheville, N.C. 28801 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

NC DEPARTMENT Olb ENVIRONMENT, HEALTH AND NA_ .RAL RESOURCES
Division of Solid Waste Nanagement
Solid Waste Section
SOLID WASTE MAMAGEIENT FACILITY EVALUATION REPORT
Type of Facility Permit #Canty,5QILO
� 1 1 j C j
Name of Facility 1kh( Z� �j�}� �_I -� j� 1�.e' Location ? �1 i'' 1
Date of Last Evaluation 'J
I. Permit Conditions Followed Yes No N/A
A. Specific Conditions) Viol
II. Operational Requirements Followed y Yes l No
q
15A N.C. Admin. Code 13B Section ;Y f t, ct• t_a
A. Specific Violation(s) by number and letter.
NZ I D-, ems, ii f!`71
III. Other Violations of Rule or Law
IV. Evaluator's Comments . (—
t J �oy rpelherps
4.ohcr
`Y n ' 16,h� �~
V. Continuation Page Required? Yes
No Receiving Signature
Evaluation Date
Solid Waste Section
DEHNR 3793 (Part I bite: Facility Part II Canary: Central Office
Part III Pink:
Regional Office)
Solid Waste Section (Review 7/%)

NC DEPARTMENT Or ENVIRONMENT, HEALTH AND NA.LURAL RESOURCES
Division of Solid waste Management
Solid waste Section
SOLID WASTE MANAGEIENT FACILITY EVALILITION REPORT
Type of Facility Permi t ) U county H Km h'r-k --sM
Name of Facility R 3 r3F1R3U1 OU)'" F•-Yd N p w— Location 5R ) 7 5, s kj yltribAo'll G
Date of Last Evaluation #�, ) I � 15 s
I. Permit Conditions Followed � Yes No N/A
A. Specific Condition(s) Violated
II. operational Requirements Followed Yes —A_No
15A N.C. Acirin. Code 13B Section + 1 G ), 6
A. Specific Violation(s) by number and letter.
• j (, Z t� �„ � � � �.,) C. i 1 � -• '% �. � 6h Z � e.. G �.S �'C. c'c�5 � '�Lt)C � C.�'7e��51 e1 C. � ! �P�+ 9 �.1,
III. Other Violations of Rule or
IV. Evaluator's Comamts`
V. Continuation Page Required? Yes No Receiving Signature /�,«`�,�
Evaluation Date ._ d1 15 Solid waste Section
DEHNR 3793 (Part I White: Facility Part II Canary: Central Office Part III Pink: Regional Office)
Solid waste Section (Review 7/94)

Q
E)EHNR
North Carolina
Department of
Environment, Health,
Natural Resources
Interchange Building
59 Woodfin Place, Asheville, North Carolina 28801-2482
Phone:[phone] Fax:[phone]
TO: .
FAX NUMBER: 70 (37
f_
FROM:
DATE: l -�` 57
Number of pages (including cover page)
COMMENTS: s�►, J
and

Y
NC DEPARTMENT OF ENvtRONMENT, HEALTH AND NATUR&, RESOURCES
Division of Solid Waste Management
Sotid haste Section
/ SOLID WASTE NANAtEIENT FACILITY EVALUATION REPORT ! t
Type of Facility I A �� J �`A l L r Penmi t if L County Plr,4l n r 50 /t 1
Name of Facility l4w� [ ]� `�l?�h) �n��±.�T�f _1� �� � f— Location } t',
Date of Last Evaluation
I. I Permit Conditions FOLtowed _Yes No N/A
A. Specific Condition(s) Violated
II. Operatiorol Requirements Followed y Yes No
15A N.C_ Admin. Code 138 Section o d�
A. Specific Violations) by nud)er and Letter.
IIL Other Violations of Rule or Law
IV. E uator's Canaents 1 h rr C yC �oy Q PS G01�c P rY i h6r S
U�,A z
V. Continuation Page Required? Yes �No Receiving Signature �Ql
G c 1
___..Evaluation Date S ' I > _: -- Solid Waste Sec ion �l /v—Z - l� G/ r F®J?/ --- ---- --.
7—
__ DEHNR 3793 (Part I White: Facility Part_II CanaryCentral--Office Part III Pink Regionat Office)._
--
-Solid Waste Section (Review 7/94)

NC DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT, HEALTH AND NATURAL RESOURCES
Division of Solid waste Management
Solid Waste Section
SOLID, TTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY EVALUATION REPORT
D
G
Type of Fac ii I i i
ty Permit _G County.
Name of Fac i I i ty �A (-,A"\ L t-�� Location
Date of Last Evaluation
I. Permit Conditions Followed Yes No N/A
A. Specific Condition(s) vi
� A 5 tu ;-' r-�
II. Operational Requirements Followed Yes No
15A N.C. Admin. Code 138 section
A. Specific Violation(s) by number and letter.
111. OiNerioLations
IV. Evatuatc>r's Comments
or Law
V. Continuation Paw Required? - Yes No Receiving Signature,
Evaluation Date Solid Waste Section i'v
DEHUR 3793 (Part I White: Facility part II Canary: CentFp'
�fl Office Part III Pink: Regional Office)
Solid Waste Section (Review 7/94) //

NC DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT, HEALTH AND NATURAL RESOURCES
Division of Solid waste Management
Solid waste Section
SOLID WASTE MANAff]ENT FACILITY EVALUATION REPORT
Type of Faci l ity )G:nla'rI YC co H0, , i, � t Perwi t I ` " 'i1 county MdC elf? �
Name of Facilityjcw'1 �h()l�'t1?Y`/p 7ol Location.
Date of Last Evaluati
I_ Permit Conditions Followed Yes No N/A
A. specific Conditions) Vi
II. Operational Requirements Followed Yes No
15A N-C. Admin. Code 130 Section ® I 10 j.
A_ Specific Violation(s) by number and Metter.
dc'UL1lJ��1t.�t�
III_ Other Violations of Rule or Law
IV. Evaluator's Comments
V. Continuation Page Required? Yes No Receiving Signature r7f�1 l>
Evaluation Date l d Solid Waste Section ;I,�l. • i-y 1_F -�" ��?A!1 .�
F
DEHNR 3793 (Part I White: Facility Part II Canary: Centl:al CGlfkefkef Part III Pink: Regional Office)
Solid waste Section (Review 7/94)

NC DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT, HEALTH AND NATURAL RESOURCES
Division of Solid Waste Management
Solid Waste Section
SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY EVALUATION REPORT
Type of Faci Lity.ITil J lli Permit N County. Pr,�Ita 4r.
Name of Facility �` G�✓�l1C1Y5DAI �!"h �, u—fl Location vJ7 �Jf 1 �.Al,
Date of Last Evaluation /
I_ Permit Conditions Followed Y Yes No N/A
A. Specific Condition(s) Viol
II. Operational Requirements Followed J\.) Yes No
15A N.C. Admin. Code 130 Section 6 Z,(o
A_ Specific Violations) by number and letter.
III. Other Violations of Rule or Law
IV. Evaluator's Comments ,AXuRN: Fh CYO�fA (1 Q1J1,1:5& r'.fiw(P Y u Lellar 1 ),AlHSit)!'Y17,..
Y. Continuation Page Required Yes Mo Receiving Signature
Evaluation Date i ! f Solid Waste Section i1:• ! a' ✓fit ' ,>1:.
DEHNR 3793 (Part I White: Facility Part II Canary: Centr 'office Part III Pink: Regional Office)
Solid Waste Section (Review 7/94)

Mr. David Thompson
Henderson County Manager
100 North King Street
Hendersonville, NC 28739
State of North Cai ilina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Environmental Management
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Nann B. Guthrie, Regional Manager
Asheville Regional Office
A4
[DEHNR
DIVISION OF SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT
SOLID WASTE SECTION99 207
c to's �co
June 28, 1995
RE: Notice of Violation Compliance Inspection at
Henderson County Landfill (Permit No. 45-01)
Henderson County - Facility
Dear Mr. Thompson:
Based on my inspection of May 2, 1995, and information recently provided to me by Nippy
Page concerning methane gas concentrations on the Trace property, the Henderson County
Landfill is now in compliance with 15A North Carolina Administrative Code 13B .1626(4)
(a)(ii)•
We appreciate your efforts towards resolving this problem.
cerely,
leet
James E. Patterson
Waste Management Specialist
JEP: sb
cc: Julian Foscue
Phil Prete
Nippy Page
Eldon Owen
Interchange Building, 59 Woodfin Place, Asheville, N.C. 28801 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper