4501_ROSCANS_1993

t� r
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
512 North Salisbury Street • Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
DIVISION OF SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor TELEPHONE: (919) 733-W92 Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
June 22, 1993
Mr. Hank Young
Industrial Maintenance Overflow Corp.
P.O. Box 1689
Fletcher, NC 28732
Subject: One Time Disposal of Approximately 8 Yd3 of Carbon Steel
Pipe Sandblast Residue at the Henderson County Sanitary
Landfill, (Permit #45-01).
Dear Mr. Young:
The Solid Waste Management Division has received a request for
characterization of the subject waste. Based upon the submitted
information, the waste appears to be non -hazardous. The Solid
Waste Management Division has no objection to the sanitary landfill
disposal of this waste, if in accordance with the conditions listed
below:
1. The owner/operator of the landfill approves the disposal.
2. The waste contains no free liquids and can be confined,
compacted, and covered in accordance with the Solid Waste
Management Rules (15A NCAC 13B).
3. Approval for sanitary landfill disposal is explicitly
limited to a "one-time" basis. Further approval by this
office will require submitted of a new Waste
Determination form, and (if applicable), new analytical
data.
Failure to meet these conditions may result in revocation of
this approval, and subsequently, an administrative penalty. If you
have further questions or comments concerning this matter, please
contact this office at [phone].
Your letter of June 3, 1993 which accompanied the request for
waste determination asked that consideration be given for two
alternatives to landfilling this waste. Those other options were
P.O. Box 27687, Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 Telephone [phone] Fax M 919-733-0513
An Fqual Opportunity Affirmative fiction Employer
50%mydd/10%poo-mmumn paM

Mr. Hank Young
June 22, 1993
Page 2
to use the material on site or to use it on the parking area at
your main facility. The Solid Waste Section has no objection to
those alternatives but we advise you to contact the Division of
Environmental Management to also obtain their opinion before
pursuing those options.
Sincerely,
-William R. Hocutt
Waste Determination Coordinator
Solid Waste Section
cc: ./James Patterson
Elden Owen

STATE OF NORTH CAROLIIM
L�ARI14E3JI' OF ENVII1 *9M, HEAIMH AND NATURAL RESaM=.'_.
SOLID WASTE mm'A 3� DIVI.SIa N ; SOLID WASTE S=w l r
PROCEDURE AND CRITERIA FOR WASTE ION
15A N.C. Admire. Code 13B .0103(d) ` r
This procedure will be used by the Solid Waste Management Division \to determine -
whether a waste is (1) hazardous as defisyed by 15A NCAC 13A, and (2) suitable -for "
disposal at a solid waste management facility. Ube types of wastes that will be
evaluated by this procedure are pri mar-i i y, but riot exclusively, and
ccmnercial wastes and sludges, and Publicly Owned Treatment Works Sludges.
The S01-id Waste Management Division reserves the right to request additional
information cr waive score of the requirements based on the type of waste if it deems
necessary- The Division may also require same wasters to be treated or altered to render
the wastes y immobile prior to
disposed at sari p l at a sanitary landfill. Wash,
terry landfills must be non -liquid which can be properly managed in
accordance With the "Solid Waste FianagE�%nent Rules". APP=7A-T TO DISPOSE OF g3- W��E
SHALL ALSO BE OBIA� FROM THE %NM OR OPERAUR OF THE LANDF EIZ PRIOR TO DISPC�.
The following information is required for an evaluation. Ina plete waste
determination forms will be returned to the
denotes information required generator without review. An asterisk(*)
for Publicly Owned Treatment Works.
A * GENERAL 1NFCd-TICt1
1• Name, TE MJONE NUMEER and mailing address of facility or person generating waste
Industrial Maintenance Overflow Corporation, P.O. Box 1689, Fletcher, NC 28732
[phone]
2. Specific location of waste (i.e. SR. #, county, city, etc...) Sugar Loaf Road,
_ Hendersonville Henderson County, NC
3. What is the waste? Sand used for sandblasting new carbon steel pipe
4. What volume of disposal will there be? Approx. 8 cu. yds.
5. What frequency of disposal will there be? 0 n e time only
6. Explain either the manufacturing process or how the waste was generated. Surface
of carbon steel pipe was sandblasted prior to painting.
B INFORMATIoN FOR HAZARDCLJS (12C12A� ON (15A N.C. Adminn. Code 13A .0006)
1. Is the waste listed under .0O06(d) (i.e., 40 CFR 261.30 - 261.33)? If yes, list
nnmber. No
*2. Toes tbA waste exhibit rnry of the f xri Calni,i&L..- i ; cs as defined by 15AN.C.
Admin. Code 13A .0006(c) (i.e., 40 CiR 261.20-261.24)? (Attach laboratory results
for TC T dcity, Reactivity, Ignitability, corrosivity.) No
C INFURQXICU FM IANDFII1,1KG DETERK NATICK
I. Does the waste contain any hazardous waste constituents listed in 15A N.C. Admin.
Code 1.3A .O006(e), Appendix VIII (i.e., 40 CFR 261, Appendix VIII)? If yes, what
constituents and what e000entratien? (Attach laboratory results)
TCLP metals analysis attached.
2. What other ooa zst ituerrts are present and 1n what cxroentration?
(Attach laboratory results) This is silica sand used once for sandblasting
(//6 above) .
3. Will the handling and disposal of this waste create dust emissions which may
cause a health hazard or nuisance to landfill personnel. No
*4. Does the waste pass the "paint filter" test for free liquids (Method 9095 in
S.W. 846)? (Attach laboratory results) Waste is solid.
*5. Which solid waste m nac}c t facility is the request for (name of landfill
and permit mm ben, incinerator, etc...)? Henderoon County Sanitary Landfill
*6. Specify how the waste will be delivered - in bulk or containers (i.e.
barrels, bags, etc.) Bulk

Fbllowing are the max3iaun leachable (TCLP) contamination
levels and pH for sol A 1
waste disposal in N.C. Landfills.
Primary N.C. drinking
water and Fetal tazardo w
limits are included for oarparison.
` axmi.cal analysis is regiired at detection limits
permitting as.tt at or below the maximum landfill levels. Irrlividual pH values
mast be >2.0 and <3.2.5; average values, accented are r orea y 4.0 - 10.0
7M generator is resPOmi.ble to determine if
thf,i r waste meets N.C. landfill
acoeptable levels. Analysis for herbicides, pesticides and organics MST BE PERFIDRMM
WHEMM ENOWIEDGE OF qm FTA.Sm MAC THEM PR SENM A POSSIBILITY. Leachable metals
mast always be determined. ?squire
if any questions exist on irtterpretatiori:
NC DRINKING NC Landfill
METAW
EPA BAZARDOUS
VATER MCL MAXIMUM
ARSENIC
LEVEL fta/L►
5.0
focml fma/LI
0.05 0.50 .
BARIUM
CADMIUM
100.0
1.00 10.00
CHROMIUM
2.0
5.0
0.01 0.10
0.05 0.50
LEAD L
LEAD
MERCURY
5.0
0.2
0.05 0.50
0.002 0.02
SELENIUM
1.0
0.01 0.10
SILVER
5.0
0.05 0.50
_ - HERBICIDES i PESTICIb s-- - ' '
-
- _ __ `.--
CHLORDANE
0.03
- 0.003
ENDRIN
0.02
0.0002 0.002
HEPTACHLOR
0.008
-0.0008
LINDANE
0.40
.
0.004 0.04
METHOXYCHIAR
10.00
0.10 1.00
TOXAPHENE
0.50
0.005 0.05
2,4-D
MOO
0.10 1.00
2,4 5-TP SILVEX
1.00
0.01 0.10
ORGANICS
BENZENE
0.5
0.005 0.05`
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
.0.5
0.005 0.05
CHLOROBENZENE
100.0
- 10
CHLOROFORM
6.0
- 0.60
O-CRESOL
200.0..•
20
N-CRESOL
200.0•
- 20
P-CRESOL
200.0
- 20
1,4 DICHLOROBENZENE
7.5
0.075 0.75
1,2 DICHLOROETHANE
0.5
0.005 0.05
1,1 DICHLOROETHYLENE
0.7
0.007 0.07
2,4 DINITROTOLUENE
0.13.
- 0.013
HEXACHLOROBENZENE
0.13
- 0.013
HEXACHLORO-I,3-BUTADIENE
0.5
- 0.05
HEXACHLOROETHANE
3.0
0.30
METHYL ETHYL KETONE
200.0
- 20
NITROBENZENE
2.0
0.20
PENTACHLOROPHENOL
100.0
- 10
PYRIDINE
5.0
- 0.50
TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
0.7
0.07
TRICHLOROETHYLENE
0.5
0.005 0.05
2,4,5-TRICHLOROPHENOL
400.0
- 40
2,4,6-TRICHI.OROPHONOL
2.0
- 0.20
VINYL CHLORIDE
0.2
0.002 0.02
"I hereby certify that the information submitted in regard to' sand -
(name of waste) is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief."
(print na®e) Ha W Yoyifg
(title) Genera
(date) dune 3
All questions o0e10aming this "Procedure" should be directed to the Solid Waste
Section at [phone]. Answer specific questions in space provided. Attach
additional sheets if necessary.
Omple:te all information, sign, and submit to:
Solid Waste Management Division; Solid Waste Section
P.O. Baal 27687; Raleigh, NC 276U
Attn: Waste Determination
DEEM Fbrm 3151 SF1.5 REV. 2/15/92

e s 5TAT( p
y�
r� i •�D
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
512 North Salisbury Street • Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT DIVISION
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor TELEPHONE: [phone] Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
January 26, 1993
Mr. Michael J. Bush
General Electric Company, Lighting Systems
Spartanburg Highway
Hendersonville, NC 28739
Subject: Disposal of Approximately One Half Ton/Week of Lime
Neutralized Process Wastewater Treatment Sludge at the
Henderson County Landfill, (Permit #45-01).
Dear Mr. Bush:
The Solid Waste Management Division has received a request for
characterization of the subject waste. Based upon the submitted
information, the waste appears to be non -hazardous. The Solid
Waste Management Division has no objection to the sanitary landfill
disposal of this waste, if in accordance with the conditions listed
below:
1. The owner/operator of the landfill approves the disposal.
2. The waste contains no free liquids and can be confined,
compacted, and covered in accordance with the Solid Waste
Management Rules (15A NCAC 13B).
3. Renewal of this approval will require resubmittal of a
Waste Determination Form and current supportive
analytical data. Renewal is required prior to subsequent
disposal if the process generating the waste changes or
if the waste composition changes significantly.
Failure to meet these conditions may result in revocation of
this approval, and subsequently, an administrative penalty. The
approval is subject to change if new rules and/or regulations were
to prohibit this practice. If the process which generates the
waste changes or if the composition of the waste changes
significantly, this approval is void and re-evaluation of the waste
P.O. Box 27687, Raleigh, North Camlina 27611-7687 Tclephone 919-733-4984 fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

Mr. Michael J. Bush
January 26, 1993
Page 2
will be required prior to subsequent disposal. If you have further
questions or comments concerning this matter, please contact this
office at [phone].
Sincerely,
William R. Hocutt
Waste Determination Coordinator
Solid Waste Section
cc: games Patterson
Elden Owen

STATE OF NORM CAROLIl&
SOLID WASTE DIVISION; SOLID WASTE SEC4ON
t
PROCmURE AND CRITERIA FOR WASTE DEI'FE�TI
M s procedure will be used by the Solid Waste Management Div�Sion to detennjn�e
whether a waste is (1) hazardous as defined by 15A NCAC 13B, and (2)..,suitable f9i
disposal at a.solid waste management facility. Uie types of wastes that -Will -be
evaluated by this procedure are primarily, but not exclusively, industrial and
c rmrcial wastes and sludges, and Publicly Owned Treatment Works Sludges.
'Ilse Solid Waste Management Division Yves the right to request additional
information or waive some of the requirements based on the type of waste if it deems
necessary. 'Il1e Division may also require some wastes to be treated or altered to render
the wastes ewrironmentally imtnbile prior to disposal at a sanitary landfill. Wastes
disposed at sanitary landfills must be ran -liquid which can be properly managed in
acoordanoe with the "Solid Viaste Management Rules". APPROVAL ID DISPOSE OF THE WASTE
SHALL ALSO EE OBTAINED EVOK THE OWNER OR OPERATCR OF THE LANDFILL PRIOR TO DISPOSAL.
qlwe following information is required for an evaluation. Incomplete waste
determination forms will be returr-sed to the generator without review. An asterisk(*)
denotes information required for Publicly Owned Treatment Works.
A * GENERAL INF0149 CN
1. Name, TEEMKNE NUMBER and mailing address ofS Y c( 1 S " or person generating waste
GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, LIGHTING
SPARTANBURG >
attn.MICH -'
2. Specific location of waste (i.e. SR. #,
STATE ROUTE 176 HENDERSON COUNTY,E JLAT, R��CK,N •
3. What is the waste? LIME IKEAIMLIII -WASTE WATER TREATMEHT
FILTER CAKE SLUDGE.
4 . What vole me of disposal will there be? Y R D R Y
I- What frequency of disposal will thereebbee? 1 /�WhE�E K
6. ExpLairie--BA tEhDeTR MESN'TAt�t55 U?�"O N AnLgeneArNaREAT WIT TE
B TNTdMlON FOR- HAZARDOUS (RCRA) (15A NCAC 13B .0006)
1- Is the waste listed under .0006(e) (i.e., 40 CFR 261.31 - 261.33)? If yes, list
N *2- Does the waste exhibit any of the four dmmcteristics as defined by .0006(d)
(i.e., 40 CFR 261.21-261.24)? (Attach laboratory results for TIC Toxicity,
Reactivity, Ignitability, Corrosivity. )_N 0
C D*100 ATLON FOR IANDl- 1j NG ON
1. Does the waste contain any hazardous waste constituents listed in .0006(e),
Appendix VIII (i.e., 40 CFR 261, Appendix VIII) ? If yes, what constituents and what
cmcentration? (Attach laboratory results) SEE ATTACHED RESULTS.
2 . What other constituents are present and in what concentration?
(Attach laboratory results) SEE ATTACHED RESULTS
3. Will the handling and disposal of this waste create dust emissions which may
cause a health hazard or nuisance to landfill personnel. NO
*4. Does the waste pass the "paint filter" test for free liquids (Method 9095 in
S.W. 846)? (Attach laboratory results) N'0
*5. Which solid waste management facility is the: regt for (name of landfill
and permit nwber, incinerator, etc... )? H E N D E R S O N COUNTY LANDFILL
PERMIT#45-01
*6. Specify how the waste will be delivered - in bulk or containers (i.e.
barred, bags, etc.) TRASH HOPPERS

Following are the max711A11F1 c
w� disposal in N.C. iandfi l ,,��bp��,l�) contamination levels and pi -I for solid
limits are included for ear on. drinking ter and Federal hazardous
�tical analysis is required at detection limits
permitting` assessment at or below the maxilm landfill levels. vival
must be >2.0 and <12.5; average values accepted are normally 4.0 -10.0 PH values
Ule generator is responsible to determine if their waste
reets ale levels. OF
Analysis herbicides, pesticides and organics
1gnFrlf�
mnst always be determined. MAID A R PRESIIiiCE A PO6SIBrLrjy. Leachable metals
if any questions exist on intearpretation.
NC OUNKM Nc Lsndfj-u
LFF.� E M RVAF=M WATM MCA, MAXIMM
ARISMIc LEM rim..a1 -ca L_
FSAF2" 5.0 0.05 �0 0
CALK" 100.0 1.00 10.00
QFFaU111p1 1.0 0.01 0.10
1PAD 5.0 0.05 0.50
MhJaaw 5.0 0.05 0.50
SEA WRK 0.2 0.002 0.02
SIDIM 1.0 0.01 0.10
0.05 0.50
MUMAW
NN 0.03 - 0.003
IHUMMEM 0.02 0.0002 0.002
L ncme 0.008 - 0.0008
0.40 0.004 0.04
-
'IUXAUIffM 10.00 0.10 1.00
2,4-D 0.50 0.005 0.05
2,4 5-W SIIUEX 10.00 0.10 1.00
1.00 0.01 0.10
�'�m
IYfTfnw,
.. ,
CJVUM TL1jTna TCja=
0.5
0.005
0.05
atE DFMN M
0.5
0.005
0.05
a tEc P OFd1
100.0
-
10
H-CMML
200.0
-
20•60
P` CRMOL
200.0
-
20
1,4 DIQQI)rMNM;E
200.0
-
20
1,2 DIQQacCjtM
7.5
0.075
0.75
1,1 DIQ1[CYbOE11IYII�Ng
0.5
0.005
0.05
2,4 DiNrfR7IgILnM
0.7
0.007
0.07
11w,amcFaXM..ENL
0.
_
0.013
F{[Ll[a0-1,]-QID1
0.1.]
_
0.013
FIf�JOuO FU]fb)I1 [ANl
0.5
0.05
METHYL E111YL KEj=
3.0
0.30
200.0
2
PFNCA O1401FLlmi4D7ML
0.20
PYRIDm
100.20
-
10
,M1UV ffjT<)MrjtM
5.0
-
0.50
'lla(WON0E111YUNK
0.7
-
0.07 -.
2,4 5- M(3jEa7opI0j0L
0.5
0.005
0.05
2,4.6-MaffO 0P1UWL
400.0
-
40
VINYL CIMCI M
2.2
0.20
0.002
0 02
"I hereby certify that the information submitted in regard to LIME -TREATMENT SLUDGE
(name of waste) is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief .11
(Pry name) M I I I A L B U S H
(signature)
(title) SUPPORT
(date) 9 �.
Section at thus 'Procedure" should be directed to the Solid Waste
additional. 7if rkxx. specific questions in space provided. Attach
Uouplete all information, sign, and submit to:
DEHNit Form 3151
Solid Waste Management Division; Solid Waste Section
P.O. Box 27687; Raleigh, NC 27611
Attn: Waste Determination
SWS REV. 11/7/90

N. C. DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT, HEALTH, & NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF LABORATORY SERVICES, ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES SECTION
P.O. BOX 28047 - 306 N. WILMINGTON ST, RALEIGH, N.C. 27611
Laboratory No. ` , Jr PURGEABLE COMPOUNDS Date of Analysis /�-
Nl to -/
COMPOUND
Ug/1
Dichlorodifluorcmethane
Chloromethane
✓Vinyl Chloride
Bronomethane
Chloroethane
Trichlorofluoromethane
✓l , l-Dichloroethvlene
Methylene Chloride
tert-Butyl Meth 1 Ether
✓trans-1,2-Dichloroethylene
_
Isopropyl ether
1,1-Dichloroethane
2 2-Dichlor r ane
I
cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene
Chloroform
BCM Bromochloronethane
j
✓l,l,l-Trichloroethane
1 I -D i ch I oroprot>ene
✓Carbon Tetrachloride
✓Benzene—�
✓1,2-Dichloroethane
✓Trichloroethylene
vll,2-Dichloropropane
Bromodichloromethane
Dibromomethane
✓Toluene
1 1 2-TrichIoroethane
i(Tet rach 1 oroet hy lene
1.3-DichIoropropane
Dibromochloromethane
1,2-Dibromoethane EDB
1-Chlorohexane
COMMENTS:
COMPOUND
Ug/1
✓Chlorobenzene
✓Ethylbenzene
1,1,1.2-Tetrachloroethane
VP-XYlene
✓m-X lene
✓o-X lene
✓St rene
Bromoform
Isopr2p.ylbenzene
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
Bromobenzene
n-Pr_po ly benzene
,2,3-Trichloropropane
2-Chlorotoluene
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene
4-Chlorotoluene
tert-Butyl Benzene
Pentachloroethane
1 2 4-Trimeth lbenzene
�—
sec-Butyl Benzene
P-Isopropyltoluene
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
✓1,4-Dichlorobenzene
n-Butylbenzene
✓1,2-Dichlorobenzene
Bis (2-Chloroisopropyl) Ether
1,2-Dibrono-3-Chlor r ane
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
_Hexachlorobutadiene
--Naphthalene
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene
kv
MDL - Minimum Detection Limit for water (EPA Method 502.2), is 1.0 Ug/1.
J - Estimated value.
K - Actual value is known to be less than value given.
L - Actual value is known to be greater than value given.
U - Material was analyzed for but not detected.
NA - Not analyzed.
1/ - Tentative identification.
✓ - Regulated VOC
T - Trihalonethane
N.C. Dept. of Environment, Health, & Natural Resources
DEHNR 306E-0 (Rev. 10/92 Laboratory Services)
#1532E D-18

N. C. DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT, HEALTH, & NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF LABORATORY SERVICES, ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES SECTION
P.O. BOX 28047 - 306 N. WILMINGTON ST, RALEIGH, N.C. 27611 l'
Laboratory No. /-1- Q
_ J PURGEABLE COMPOUNDS Date of Analvsis�//
1'1w-2-
COMPOUND
Ng/l
Dichlorodifluoronethane
Chloromethane
✓Vin 1 Chloride
Bromomethane
Chloroethane
Trichlorofluoromethane
✓1,1-Dichloroethylene
Methylene Chloride
tert-But 1 Methyl Ether
✓trans-1,2-Dichloroeth lene
Isopropyl ether
1 1-Dichloroethane
2,2-Dichloropropane
✓cis-1 2-Dichloroeth lene
Chloroform
BCM Bromochloromethane
✓1, 1.1-Trichloroethane
>,
_1 I -D i ch I oropropene
✓Carbon Tetrachloride
✓Benzene
✓1 2-Dichloroethane
✓TrichIoroethyIene
_
i K
✓1,2-Dichlor .propane
U
Bromodichloromethane
Dibromomethane
✓Toluene
1 1 2-Trichloroethane
✓Tetrachloroeth lene
1.3-Dichloropropane
Dibromochloromethane
1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)
1-Chlorohexane
_
COMMENTS: U vl d e_wl .t f`ePe-ed<5 r e 5c vL. r
COMPOUND
Ng/1
✓Chlorobenzene
✓Eth lbenzene
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane
✓ -X 1 ene
✓m-X lene
✓o-X lene
✓St rene
Bromoform
Isoprovylbenzene
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
Bromobenzene
_n-Propylbenzene
1 2 3-Trichlor r ane
2-Chlorotoluene
1,3,5-Trimeth lbenzene
4-Chlorotoluene
tert-Butyl Benzene
Pentachloroethane
1,2,4-Trimeth lbenzene
sec -Butyl Benzene
p-Isopropyltoluene
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
✓1 4-Dichlorobenzene
n-But lbenzene
✓1,2-Dichlorobenzene
_
�—
Bis (2-Chloroisopropyl) Ether
1 2-Dibromo-3-Chlor r ane
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
Hexachlorobutadiene
Naphthalene
1 2 3-Trichlorobenzene
MDL - Minimum Detection Limit for water (EPA Method 502.2), is 1.0 ug/1.
J - Estimated value.
K - Actual value is known to be less than value given.
L - Actual value is known to be greater than value given.
U - Material was analyzed for but not detected.
NA - Not analyzed.
1/ - Tentative identification.
✓ - Regulated VOC
T - Trihalomethane
N.C. Dept. of Environment, Health, & Natural Resources
DEHNR 3068-0 (Rev. 10/92 Laboratory Services)
#1532E D-18

N. C. DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT, HEALTH, & NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF LABORATORY SERVICES, ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES SECTION
P.O. BOX 28047 - 306 N. WILMINGTON ST, RALEIGH, N.C. 27611
Laboratory No. PURGEABLE COMPOUNDS Date of Analysis
Hw-3
COMPOUND
Ng/l
Dichlorodifluoromethane
Ti
Chloromethane
✓Vin 1 Chloride
Bromomethane
Chloroethane
Trichlorofluoromethane
✓1 1-Dichloroeth lene
Methylene Chloride
tert-But 1 Methyl- Ether
trans-1 2-Dichloroeth lene
Isopropyl ether
1,1-Dichloroethane
2 2-Dichlor r ane
✓cis-1,2-Dichloroeth lene
9' '%
Chloroform
BCM Bromochloromethane
✓1,1.1-Trichloroethane
1.1-Dichloropropene
✓Carbon Tetrachloride
j
✓Benzene
v
✓1,2-Dichloroethane
✓Trichloroeth lene
✓1,2-Dichloropropane
K
Bronodichloromethane
Dibronomethane
✓Toluene
1 1 2-Trichloroethane
✓Tetrachloroethylene
1.3-Dichloropropane
Dibromochlorcmethane
1 2-Dibronoethane EDB
1-Chlorohexane
IV
COIM9ENTS: Nn1`de.v�� pez,,A5 prejc,,�
COMPOUND
Ug/1
✓Chlorobenzene
✓Eth lbenzene
1 1 1 2-Tetrachloroethane
✓ -X l ene
_
✓m-Xylene
✓o-X lene
Styrene
Bromoform
Isopropylbenzene
_1,1.2,2-Tetrachloroethane
Bromobenzene
n-Pr lbenzene
1 2 3-Trichlor r ane
2_Chlorotoluene
1.3,5-Trimethylbenzene
4-Chlorotoluene
tert-But l Benzene
Pentachloroethane
1 2 4-Trimeth lbenzene
sec -Butyl Benzene
-Is r ltoluene
1 3-Dichlorobenzene
✓1,4-Dichlorobenzene
n-Butylbenzene
!L—
✓1,2-Dichlorobenzene
Bis 2-Chlorois r 1 Ether
1 2-Dibrono-3-Chlor r ane
1,2.4-Trichlorobenzene
Hexachlorobutadiene
Naphthalene
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene
MDL - Minimum Detection Limit for water (EPA Method 502.2), is 1.0 ug/l.
J - Estimated value.
K - Actual value is known to be less than value given.
L - Actual value is known to be greater than value given.
U - Material was analyzed for but not detected.
NA - Not analyzed.
1/ - Tentative identification.
✓ - Regulated VOC
T - Trihalomethane
N.C. Dept. of Environment, Health, & Natural Resources
DEHNR 3068-0 (Rev. 10/92 Laboratory Services)
#1532E D-18

N. C. DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT, HEALTH, & NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF LABORATORY SERVICES, ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES SECTION
P.O. BOX 28047 - 306 N. WILMINGTON ST, RALEIGH, N.C. 27611
Laboratory No. C % �? J C PURGEABLE COMPOUNDS Date of Analysis 3
Wtw -y
COMPOUND
Ng/l
Dichlorodifluoromethane
Chloromethane
✓Vin 1 Chloride
Bronomethane
_
Chloroethane
Trichlorofluoromethane
✓1 1-Dichloroeth lene
Methylene Chloride
tert-But 1 Methyl Ether
✓trans-1,2-Dichloroethylene
_
Isopropyl ether
1,1-Dichloroethane
2 2-Dichlor r ane
✓cis-1,2-Dichloroeth lene
Chloroform
-(BCM) Bromochloromethane
✓1 1 1-Trichloroethane
1,1-Dichlor r ne
✓Carbon Tetrachloride
✓Benzene
✓1 2-Dichloroethane
✓Trichloroeth lene
,/1,2-Dichl ropropane
Bronodichloromethane
Dibromomethane
✓Toluene
1,1,2-Trich1oroethane
v(Tet rach 1 oroethy lene
-1.3-Dichloropropane
Dibromochlorcmethane
1,2-Dibronoethane EDB
1-Chlorohexane
COMMENTS:
COMPOUND
119/1
✓Chlorobenzene
✓Eth lbenzene
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane
_✓p-Xylene
✓m-X lene
✓o-X lene
✓St rene
_Bromoform
Isopropylbenzene
1.1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
Bromobenzene
n-Propylbenzene
_1,2,3-Trichloropr2pane
2-Chlorotoluene
1,3,5-Trimeth lbenzene
4-Chlorotoluene
tert-Butyl Benzene
Pentachloroeth_ane
1,2 4-Trimeth lbenzene
sec -Butyl Benzene
p-Isopropyltoluene
1 3-Dichlorobenzene
✓1,4-Dichlorobenzene
n-Butylbenzene
✓1 2-Dichlorobenzene
Bis 2-Chlorois r 1 Ether
1.2-Dibromo-3-Chlor r ane
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
Hexachlorobutadiene
Naphthalene
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene
MDL - Minimum Detection Limit for water (EPA Method 502.2), is 1.0 ug/l.
J - Estimated value.
K - Actual value is known to be less than value given.
L - Actual value is known to be greater than value given.
U - Material was analyzed for but not detected.
NA - Not analyzed.
1/ - Tentative identification.
✓ - Regulated VOC
T - Trihalcmethane
N.C. Dept. of Environment, Health, & Natural Resources
DEHNR 3068-0 (Rev. 10/92 Laboratory Services)
#1532E D-18

N. C. DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT, HEALTH, & NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF LABORATORY SERVICES, ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES SECTION
P.O. BOX 28047 - 306 N. WILMINGTON ST, RALEIGH, N.C. 27611
Laboratory No. l` J �C� PURGEABLE COMPOUNDS Date of Analysis
Stv-/
COMPOUND
Ng/l
Dichlorodifluoromethane
Ch I oromethane
✓Vinyl Chloride
_
Bromomethane
_
_Chloroethane
_
Trichlorofluoromethane
✓1,1-Dichloroethylene
Methylene Chloride
tent -Butyl Methyl Ether
✓trans-1,2-Dichloroethvlene
Isopropyl ether
1,1-Oichloroethane
K
2,2-Dichloropropane
lk
✓cis-1.2-Dichloroethylene
_f<_
Chloroform
_(BCM) Browchloromethane
✓l,l,l-Trichloroethane
1,_1-Dichloropropene
✓Carbon Tetrachloride
✓Benzene
✓1 2-Di ch lorcethane
✓Trichloroethylene
_
✓l,2-Dichlo o ropane
Bromodichloromethane
Dibromomethane
✓Toluene
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
✓Tetrachloroeth lene
_1,3-DichIoropropane
I
Dibronochloromethane_
�-
1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)
1-ChIorohexane
COMMENTS:
COMPOUND
ug/1
✓Chlorobenzene
0
✓Ethylbenzene
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane
✓ -X lene
✓m-Xylene
✓o-Xylene
✓St rene
Bromoform_
Iso_propylbenzene
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
Bromobenzene
_n-Propylbenzene
1,2,3-Trichloropropane
2-Chlorotoluene
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene
4-Chlorotoluene
tert-But 1 Benzene
Pentachloroethane
_1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene
sec -Butyl Benzene
_
p-Isopropyltoluene
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
✓1,4-Dichlorobenzene
n-But lbenzene
i
✓1,2-Dichlorobenzene
Bis (2-Chlorois r 1) Ether
1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
Hexachlorobutadiene
Naphthalene
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene
MDL - Minimum Detection Limit for water (EPA Method 502.2), is 1.0 pg/l.
J - Estimated value.
K - Actual value is known to be less than value given.
L - Actual value is known to be greater than value given.
U - Material was analyzed for but not detected.
NA - Not analyzed.
1/ - Tentative identification.
✓ - Regulated VOC
T - Trihalomethane
N.C. Dept. of Environment, Health, & Natural Resources
DEHNR 3068-0 (Rev. 10/92 Laboratory Services)
#1532E D-18

N. C. DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT, HEALTH, 8 NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF LABORATORY SERVICES, ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES SECTION
P.O. BOX 28047 - 306 N. WILMINGTON ST, RALEIGH, N.C. 27611
Laboratory No. ` 3 , PURGEABLE COMPOUNDS Date of Analvsis
�W-7—
COMPOUND
Dichlorodifluoromethane
G!
Chloronethane
vNin 1 Chloride
Bromomethane
Chloroethane
Trichlorofluoromethane
✓1 1-Dichloroeth lene
Methylene Chloride
tert-But 1 Methyl Ether
✓trans-1 2-Dichloroeth lene
Isopropyl ether
1 1-Dichloroethane
2 2-Dichlo ne
14
✓cis-1 2-Dichloroeth lene
Chloroform
BCM Broiochloromethane
U
✓1 1 1-Trichloroethane
1 1-Dichlo r ne
✓Carbon Tetrachloride
✓Benzene
✓1 2-Dichloroethane
✓Trichloroeth lene
,/1.2-Dichloropropane
Bromodichloromethane
Dibronomethane
✓Toluene
1 1 2-Trichloroethane
✓Tetrachloroeth lene
1.3-Dichloropropane
U
Dibromochloromethane
1 2-Dibrongethane E08
1-Chlorohexane
COMMENTS:
COMPOUND
ug/1
✓Chlorobenzene
U
✓Eth lbenzene
1 1 1 2-Tetrachloroethane
✓ -X lene
✓m-X lene
✓o-X lene
✓St rene
Bromoform
Is r lbenzene
1 1 2 2-Tetrachloroethane
Bromobenzene
-n-Propylbenzene
1 2 3-Trichlor r ne
2-Chlorotoluene
1 3 5-Trimeth lbenzene
4-Chlorotoluene
tert-But 1 Benzene
Pentachloroethane
1 2 4-Trimeth lbenzene
sec -Butyl Benzene
P-Isopropyltoluene
1 3-Dichlorobenzene
iK
✓1 4-Dichlorobenzene
n-But lbenzene
✓1 2-Dichlorobenzene
Bis 2-Chlorois r 1 Ether
1 2-Dibromo-3-Chlor r ne
!/
1 2 4-Trichlorobenzene
Hexachlorobutadiene
Naphthalene
1 2 3-Trichlorobenzene
MDL - Minimum Detection Limit for water (EPA Method 502.2), is 1.0 119/1.
J - Estimated value.
K - Actual value is known to be less than value given.
L - Actual value is known to be greater than value given.
U - Material was analyzed for but not detected.
NA - Not analyzed.
1/ - Tentative identification.
✓ - Regulated VOC
T - Trihalomethane
N.C. Dept. of Environment, Health, 8 Natural Resources
DEHNR 3068-0 (Rev. 10/92 Laboratory Services)
#1532E D-18

N. C. DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT, HEALTH, & NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF LABORATORY SERVICES, ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES SECTION
P.O. BOX 28047 - 306 N. WILMINGTON ST, RALEIGH, N.C. 27611
Laboratory No. ` �PURGEABLE COMPOUNDS Date of Analysis
' 'W_Z
COMPOUND
Ug/1
Dichlorodifluoromethane
Chloronethane
✓Vin 1 Chloride
Bromomethane
Chloroethane
Trichlorofluoromethane
✓1 I -D i ch I oroethy Iene
Methylene Chloride
tert-But 1 Methyl Ether
✓trans-1 2-Dichloroeth lene
Isopropyl ether
1 1-Dichloroethane
2 2-Dichlor r ne
✓cis-1 2-Dichloroeth lene
Chloroform
BCM Bromochloromethane
✓1 1 1-Trichloroethane
1 1-Dichlor r ne
✓Carbon Tetrachloride
✓Benzene
✓1 2-Dichloroethane
✓Trichloroethylene
t(l.2-Dichloropropane
i
Bromodichloranethane
Dibromomethane
✓Toluene
1 1 2-Trichloroethane
✓Tetrachloroeth lene
1.3-Dichloroprcoane
Dibromochloromethane
1 2-Dibromoethane EDB
1-Chlorohexane
COMMENTS:
COMPOUND
tirg/1
✓Chlorobenzene
✓Eth lbenzene
1 1 1 2-Tetrachloroethane
✓ -X lene
✓m-X lene
✓o-X lene
✓St rene
Bromoform
-Isopropylbenzene
1 1 2 2-Tetrachloroethane
Bronobenzene
n-Pr lbenzene
1 2 3-Trichlor r ane
2-Chlorotoluene
1 3 5-Trimeth lbenzene
4-Chlorotoluene
tert--But 1 Benzene
Pentachloroethane
1 2 4-Trimeth lbenzene
sec -Butyl Benzene
-Is r ltoluene
1 3-Dichlorobenzene
✓1 4-Dich1orobenzene
n-But lbenzene
✓t 2-Dichlorobenzene
Bis 2-Chlorois r 1 Ether
1 2-Dibromo-3-Chlor r ane
1.2,4-Trichlorobenzene
Hexachlorobutadiene
Naphthalene
1 2 3-Trichlorobenzene
MDL - Minimum Detection Limit for water (EPA Method 502.2), is 1.0 ug/1.
J - Estimated value.
K - Actual value is known to be less than value given.
L - Actual value is known to be greater than value given.
U - Material was analyzed for but not detected.
NA - Not analyzed.
1/ - Tentative identification.
✓ - Regulated VOC
T - Trihalomethane
N.C. Dept. of Environment, Health, & Natural Resources
DEHNR 306M (Rev. 10/92 Laboratory Services)
#1532E D-18

N. C. DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT, HEALTH, & NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF LABORATORY SERVICES, ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES SECTION
P.O. BOX 28047 - 306 N. WILMINGTON ST, RALEIGH, N.C. 27611
Laboratory No. ? 0, PURGEABLE COMPOUNDS Date of Analysis
J�V- L/
COMK)UND
Vg/l
Dichlorodifluoromethane
Chloromethane
✓Vin 1 Chloride
Bronanethane
Chloroethane
Trichlorofluoromethane
✓1 1-Dichloroeth lene
Methylene Chloride
tert-But 1 Methyl Ether
✓trans-1 2-Dichloroeth lene
Isopropyl ether
!
1.1-Dichloroethane
2 2-Dichlor r ane
✓cis-1 2-Dichloroeth lene
Chloroform
!
BCM Bronochloromethane
✓1 1 1-Trichloroethane
1 1-Dichlor r ne
✓Carbon Tetrachloride
✓Benzene
✓1 2-Dichloroethane
✓Trichloroeth lene
,/1.2-Dichloropropane
Bronodichlorawthane
Dibromomethane
✓Toluene
1 1 2-Trichloroethane
✓Tetrachloroeth lene
1,3-Dichlorppropane
Dibronochloromethane
1 2-Dibromoethane EDB
1-Chlorohexane
COMMENTS:
COMPOUND
Ng/1
✓Chlorobenzene
✓Eth lbenzene
1 1 1 2-Tetrachloroethane
✓ -X lene
✓m-X lene
✓o-X lene
✓St rene
Bronoform
Is r lbenzene
1 1 2 2-Tetrachloroethane
Bronobenzene
n-Pr lbenzene
1 2 3-Trichlor r ane
2-Chlorotoluene
1,3.5-Trimeth lbenzene
4-Chlorotoluene
tert-Butyl Benzene
Pentachloroethane
1 2 4-Trimeth lbenzene
-sec-Butyl Benzene
-Is r ltoluene
1 3-Dichlorobenzene
✓l 4-Dichlorobenzene
n-But lbenzene
✓1 2-Dichlorobenzene
Bis 2-Chlorois r 1 Ether
1 2-0ibromo-3-Chlor r ane
1 2 4-Trichlorobenzene
Hexachlorobutadiene
-Naphthalene
1 2 3-Trichlorobenzene
MDL - Minimum Detection Limit for water (EPA Method 502.2), is 1.0 ug/l.
J - Estimated value.
K - Actual value is known to be less than value given.
L - Actual value is known to be greater than value given.
U - Material was analyzed for but not detected.
NA - Not analyzed.
l/ - Tentative identification.
✓ - Regulated VOC
T - Trihalomethane
N.C. Dept. of Environment, Health, & Natural Resources
DEHNR 3068-0 (Rev. 10/92 Laboratory Services)
#1532E D-18

STATE LA80RATORY OF PUOLIC HEALTH
DIVISION OF HEALTH SERVICES, N.C. OEPARTMEHT OF ,HUMAN RESCURCES
P.O. BOX 28047 - 306 N. WILMIHGTON, T., RALEIGH. N.C. 21611
NI_ I YSIS
PURCEA8LE CCMPCUNOS
lABNo�1
3 rJ
Ci J
FIELD a
"70.zo
1 J7C)_, , I
CCtiPOUNO
chIoronethane
TYPE
( 3
( 3
)
(
( ( 1
UNITS
ua/1 a/ka
ua/1 a/ka
a/1 ua/ka
ua/1 ua/ka
ua/l ua/ka ua/1 tin/'Lea
b ranane thane
dichlorodifluorcnethane
vinyl -chloride
chloroethane
methylene chloride
trichlorofluorcmethane
ethene 1 1-dichlor,o
ethane 1 1-dichloro_.
1 2-trans-dichlorcethene
_
chloroform
'I
ethane 1 2-dichloro-.
ethane 1,1 1-trichloro-
carbontetrachloride
bronodichloromethane
1O
rooane 1 2-dichlor-o-
Jr
1 3-trans-dichloroorooene
trichloroethvlene
_(/
chlorodibronax-thane
l
benzene
ethane 1 1 2-trichloro-
411,
1 3-cis-dichlorooreo.ene
I
2-chloroeth l vin 1 ether
lit
bronoform
I
I
ethane 1 1 2 2-tetrachloro-
5 On
ethene tetrachloro-,.
toluene
chlor)benzene
ethvlbenzene I
i
I
I
acetone
2-butanone
carbondisulfide
rS
2-hexanone
d-meth 1-2 ntanone
st rene
I
vinyl acetate
xvlenes •'at
I
TM CL
- W
ye
Actual value �is.
known to be less than value given.
Actual value -is known to be greater than value given.
T - Material was analyzed for but not detected. The nurber is the Mininxm Detection Limit. = M D L
U1 - Not analyzed,
1/ - Tentative identification.
?/ - On HROC list of Priority Pollutants.
N-C. Division of llealth Services
DTIS 3068-0 (4/86 Laboratory)

STATE LABORATORY OF PUBLIC HEALTH
DIVISION OF HEALTH SERVICES, N.C. DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES
P.O. BOX 28047 306 N. WILM TON, ST.�LEIGH, N.C./27611
Sw—I Sw _z
BASE/NEUTRAL AND ACID
.� • � �L1i!!�'=���'-:sue.*
'�i�������i��..t`'"
�f=�����_:�_•-'.hexachloroethane
anthracene
dibutyl phthalate
fluoranthene
�.�
m-D L
J - Estimated value. H2.01So11—
K - Actual value is known to be less than value given.
L - Actual value is known to be greater than value given.
U - Material was analyzed for but not detected. The number is the Minimum Detection Limit. MDL
NA - Not analyzed. r
1/ - Tentative identification.
2/ - On NRDC List of Priority Pollutants.
N.C. Divi6ion a6 Heatth SeAvicu
VHS 3O68-0 (4186 Laboxatmy)

0
BASE/NEUTRAL AND ACID
EXTRACTABLES
COMPOUND
benzidine
butyl benzyl phthalate
benz (a) anthracene
chrysene
3 3-dichlorobenzidine
bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthal
di-n-octyl phthalate
benzo(b)fluoranthene
ben zo (k) f I uoran t hene
benzo(a)pyrene
indeno(1 2 3-cd)pyrene
dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
benzo(o.h.i)perylene_
aniline
benzoic acid
benzyl alcoho
4-chloroanili
2-methylnaphtha1
2-methylphenol
4-met4y1phenol
2-ni troani I ine
3-nitroaniline
4-nitroaniline
2.4.5-trichIorcK
STATE LABORATORY OF PUBLIC HEALTH
DIVISION 28047HEALTH SE N WI.LM GTDN DEPARTMENT OF H MAN CRESOURCES l
DI, //1 ORGANIC C OAL ANALYS19 l J
UNITS
/ 7o/.3 1 /7 0
ty) D I-
3 - Estimated value. HzO/So/L
K - Actual value is known to be less than value given.
L - Actual value is known to be greater than value given.
U - Material was analyzed for but not detected. The number is the Minimum Detection Limit. /1��L
NA - Not analyzed.
l/ - Tentative identification.
2/ - On NRDC List of Priority Pollutants.
N.C. Divizion 06 Heaf th SenvicU
DHS 3068-0 (4/86 Laboka tony)

a
STATE LABORATORY OF PUBLIC HEALTH
DIVISION OF HEALTH SERVICES, N.C. DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES
P.O. BOX 28047 - 306 N. WILMINGTO�N% ST.,, R,A(LEIGH C..27 1
CkANTr. r I auai Te
..
��MANKMiL�,o
W AIR!2
i1N
r9�
iia�
• • • • I
18TV11r.M11r,hexachloroethane
--________-,-
nitrobenzene
naphthalene
• -phthalate
acenaphthene
fluorene
diethyl phthalate
' . • ni tro--o--cresol
d_iphenylamineazobenzene
hexachlorobenzene
phenanthrene
N
•N.Nralv•
��-
m-D L
J - Estimated value. f/2.0/S0/L-
K - Actual value is known to be less than value given.
L - Actual value is known to be greater than value given.
U - Material was analyzed for but not detected. The number is the Minimum Detection Limit. M2)L
NA - Not analyzed.
1/ - Tentative identification.
2/ - On NRDC List of Priority Pollutants.
N.C. Divi6ian u6 Heat th SeAvicu
DHS 3068-0 (4186 Labo&atany)

(9)
STATE LABORATORY OF PUBLIC HEALTH
DIVISION OF HEALTH SERVICES, N.C. DEPARTMENT of HUMAN RESOURCES
P.O. BOX 28047 - 306 N. WILMINGT44, ST.. RA EIGH,,JI� C. 21611
IZILLOr � �,✓�
3ORGANIC A MICAL ANALYS S I 1, 0
AL AND ACID
EXT.. , .:
MUM
•
�-
=41
MW �-U
di-n--octyl phthalate
.
MI10
09
=�=�M
.....
..,�...��..�..C.�benzoic
acid
MDI-
J - Estimated value. Hz0/S0/L
K - Actual value is known to be less than value given.
L - Actual value is known to be greater than value given.
U - Material was analyzed for but not detected. The number is the Minimum Detection Limit. nil.
NA - Not analyzed.
1/ - Tentative identification.
2/ - On NRDC List of Priority Pollutants.
N.C. 0-1-'v"' 4-011 06 Health Sehvl.ca
VHS 3068-0 (4186 Labo&atmy)

\ v
�N oak
1 �
0
T
4�,V O
S
P
S

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
512 North Salisbury Street • Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
February 3, 1993
Mr.. David F. Thompson
Henderson County Manager
100 North King Street
Hendersonville, N. C. 28792.
Re: Review Of Ground Water Monitoring Program At The Henderson
County Sanitary Landfill (Permit #45-01)
Dear Mr. Thompson,
This past November Larry Rose of the Solid Waste Section made a
site visit to the Henderson County Landfill in order to inspect the
ground -water monitoring wells, split ground and surface water samples
with PACE, Inc., and take some soil samples from an area where ground
water had been seeping from a road cut. This letter is to report our
evaluation of the monitoring program at the Henderson County Landfill
based on the field observations and a review of the data from the
sampling event.
The sample results did not indicate any significant violations
of State Groundwater Standards. Iron and Manganese were reported at
some sampling locations at levels that exceed the water quality
standards. However, since these are secondary drinking water
standards that relate to taste, odor, and staining rather than to
increased health risks, these elevated levels do not appear to pose
any threat to the public health or the environment. The slightly
elevated levels of some inorganic parameters and trace amounts of
some organic constituents do indicate some degradation of water
quality. Based on existing data, there are no violations of ground
water quality standards that would mandate further investigation.
The soil samples from the road cut where some ground water
seepage has occurred do not indicate the presence of ground water
contamination. The constituents reported are present at levels that
fall within the normal range for sediments in this geologic
environment.
After the field inspection of the monitoring system, more
serious questions were raised regarding the adequacy of the present
monitoring wells to effectively monitor the effect of the landfilling
activities on the ground water of the area. There are significant
problems with the location, depth, and design of the existing
P.O. Box 27687, Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 Telephone [phone] Fax # [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

Page 2
monitoring wells. The wells are located too far away from the waste
boundary and are installed too deep to be effective in monitoring the
impact of the landfill on the uppermost aquifer. Also, there are
some problems with the design and construction of the wells. For
example, the annular space around each well is not grouted to the
ground surface.
Henderson County should obtain a consultant to evaluate the
existing monitoring system and propose an upgraded monitoring system
that will effectively monitor the impact of the landfilling activity
on the uppermost aquifer in the area. It is also important that the
monitoring wells conform to the North Carolina Well Construction
Standards (15A NCAC 2C). If the facility will still be in operation
on October 9, 1993, there are additional requirements that will be
necessary to .fulfill new State and Federal rules resulting from the
RCRA Subtitle D regulations.
The County or its consultant should contact the Solid Waste
Section for technical assistance in determining what is necessary for
the upgraded ground -water monitoring system. Within the next few
months a monitoring plan should be submitted to the Section for our
approval, and then the approved new wells should be installed.
We appreciate Henderson County's interest in the water quality
monitoring program at the landfill. Thank you for your cooperation
in improving the monitoring system in order to provide effective
protection of public health and the environment. If you have any
questions or comments regarding this letter, please contact the Solid
Waste Section at [phone].
Sincerely,
Bobby Lutfy, Hydrogeologist
Solid Waste Section
Division of Solid Waste Management
cc: Jim Patterson
Attachments

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health, and Natural Resources
Division of Environmental Management
Asheville Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr. Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
WATER QUALITY SECTION
October 26, 1993
Mr. David Thompson
Henderson County
100 North King Street
Hendersonville, North Carolina 28792
Dear Mr. Thompson:
,If .I AA
A&14 a
DEHNR
Subject: Henderson County Landfill
Henderson County
In reference to the water quality violations below the Henderson
County Landfill, Division of Environmental Management representatives
have taken follow-up samples at tributaries originating at the
landfill. The contamination leaving the site was at an acceptable
level based on recent stream samples. We will continue to monitor the
water quality in this area. Please be aware that further violations
may result in enforcement actions.
As you know, the upper pond at the landfill provides a less than
ideal method of controlling sediment. The upper pond is of concern
due to the tributary running through the pond. Given the problems
with the design of the sediment ponds, it is recommended that the
County make improvements to the design and operation of the ponds to
prevent further water quality violations. We would like to receive a
copy of the planed improvements and an opportunity to provide comments
prior to construction or implementation of the improvements.
Your cooperation in dealing with the sedimentation ponds in the
past and in the future is greatly appreciated by this Division. If
you have any questions concerning this matter, or would like to
discuss plans for improvement, do not hesitate to contact the Division
of Environmental Management, Water Quality Section, the Division of
Land Resources, Land Quality Section, or the Division of Solid Waste
Management, Solid Waste Section at the phone number and address listed
below.
Sincerely, �
Lid da S . Wiggs
Environmental Technician
xc: Jim Patterson V
Dennis Owenby
Interchange Buiding, 59 Woodfin Place, Asheville, N.C. 28801
Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

py
� \t
ELDON OWEN
SOLID WASTE DIRECTOR
697.4505
October 6, 1993
\Ol/NDED A%$
HENDERSON COUNTY
SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT
802 Stoney Mountain Road
Hendersonville, NC 28739
Mr. Jim Coffey
N.C. Solid Waste Section
P.O. Box 27687
Raleigh, N.C. 27611
uof: stoney iivun taln r\,c :d T cndf
Henderson County
Dear Mr. Coffey:
NIPPY PAGE
INTEGRATED
SOLID WASTE PLANNER
697-4877
Mr. Jim Patterson with your staff has requested this letter to
address the current status with the Henderson County Stoney
Mountain Road Landfill. It is our intention to continue operating
this landfill past October 9, 1993 in accordance with applicable
State, Federal, and County rules and regulations. We have
requested our consultant William G. Lapsley and Associates, P.A. to
develop a proposal for the preparation of the Transition Plan. It
is our understanding the Transition Plan is due by April 9, 1994.
At this time a specific closure date for the landfill has not been
established. Henderson County is in the process of siting a new
landfill and we do plan to close the Stoney Mountain Road Landfill
on or before the required January 1, 1998 closure date. At this
time with the current solid waste load and operating conditions we
should be able to remain in the current site until at least mid to
late 1996. As you are aware conditions in the solid waste industry
are constantly changing and the 1996 expected closure date could be
extended. We intend to try and pin point a more exact closure date
with the development of the Transition Plan.
We hope this information is sufficient as requested by Mr.
Patterson. It should be noted that your staff has not responded to
our request to utilize an alternative daily cover and return to the
1982 approved fill contours allowing filling of the air space above
our recycling center. It is our intention to proceed with this
plan of action unless directed otherwise. Should there be any
questions do not hesitate to contact our office at 704-697-4505.
aon
_ you e Ow s
cc David Thompson
Gary Tweed
Jim Patterson

SAFEWASTE
August 30, 1993
Mr. Eldon Owen
Director of Solid Waste Management
Henderson County
802 Stony Mountain Road
Hendersonville, North Carolina 28739
Dear Mr. Owen:
SafeWaste is currently offering our mobile microwave medical waste treatment service to several
hospitals in Henderson County. This service consists of utilizing the ABB Sanitec Microwave
Disinfection System to shred and disinfect medical waste into a safe confetti -like material ready for
landfill disposal. As we have discussed, we are seeking your approval to dispose of the treated waste
in the Henderson County Landfill.
The microwave process has been examined carefully by the State of North Carolina and has recently
been written into the North Carolina Administrative Code as an acceptable treatment technology.
Attached is a letter from the Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources that explains
those rules.
Recently, we signed a contract with Memorial Mission Hospital in Asheville and the Buncombe
County Landfill has confirmed that they will accept the treated waste.
Enclosed is some information about our treatment process for your review. We look forward to the
opportunity to bring to Henderson County a progressive and environmentally sound method for
dealing with the medical waste problem. Please let us know if it is acceptable to dispose of the
treated waste in your landfill, so we can advise the hospitals that are potential users of our service. If
you require any other information or have any questions, please do not hesitate to call.
Best regards
D. Alex Fairley, Jr.
Vice President
Enclosures
cc: Jim Patterson
N.C. Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
SafeWaste Corporation • 13801 Reese boulevard West • Suite 100 • Huntersville, NC 28078 0 704-948-0035 9 Fax [phone]

L,..',, '
In follow up several meetings with your staff both in Raleigh
and the region. the 'following.:information.is being_ submitted to:
summarize the,, request '.by Henderson County to',. utilize., `the`, landfill
area ° currently being used _'.`as ' the 1. recycling. center for .continued
'fill area under ` there current :permit,'.
The current permit' issued in 1982 approved.a landfill base
which includes the current recycling center. -The recycling center
was constructed on top of,existing waste. Recent borings in this
area revealed waste at.,
12 .feet below the current surface:. Iri 1986'
a lateral expansion 'on the north•face of the ,landfill was approved
extending the base slightly to the north;and._allowing,.a haul road
to be constructed around the north :face. The combined base. line is
shown on attached site plan -which reflects the 1982 approved'base
and the 1986 expansion. .By locating the recycling center and haul.
road within the base of the landfill -the County is losing available
fill space originally, approved in ,1982 . That being 'the 'air space
above. the recycling center since side .slopes 'have been:shifted
inward from the '1982 approved plan:. The top,elevation,of the 1982
approved plan is'..elevation 2410; and=was not: changed with the 1986.
expansion permit modification.
It is planned to -relocate the recycling center and haul road
freeing up the space approved in 1982 for continued fill area. We
have estimated that the.County could gain an-additional'year beyond
current mode of operation with the use ,of this area. The,current
drainage patterns and erosion' control will not change with this
modification. Enclosed is' .a' site ,plan; o,f the landfill indicating
the current landfill based and the,'proposed fill .contours. The
base is -,a combination -of the 1'982 approved base and the 1986
expansion modification and the top elevation,of ;,2410, ,is- the_ sameas
the' .1982 approval.'.', This modification,.reque'st does' not extend the
Iy .
f` ' Printed on Recycled Paper

William G: -LAP sley & Associates, P.A.
Engineering, Surveying and Land Planning
1635 Asheville Highway
Post" Office`.Box 546
Hendersonville; North Carolina 28793
704-697-7334 . FAX [phone]
Hendersonville
William G. Lapsley, P.E.-
April - 26, A 9 3 Gary Tweed, P.E.
Stacy K. Rhodes, R.L.S. .
q. Steven L. Waggoner, R.L.S.
G. Marctis Brittain; R.L.S.
Sylva
Donald L: Hunley, P.E..
N.0 . Division of , Solid Waste. Management
P.O Box' 27687`
Raleigh", N-.C.. ` 27611=7687._`
Ref: Henderson County_'`Solid Waste -Programs
Dear ,Ms . i�ioytt
In follow up to our meeting of 'April'23, 1993, I would like to
summarize those areas that we discussed., with respect to the
Henderson County Solid Waste Programs Our meeting was very
informative and the ' information 'gathered. will be helpful. to our
firm assisting Henderson,County.with their 'solid waste programs.
The • two areas which 'we discussed . were,,the ;,selection: of a ,new solid
.waste "landfill and the utilization` of , the existing landfill site on
Stoney Mountain Road.
NEW'SITE SELECTION PROCESS
William G. Lapsley and Associates, P.A., has completed a site
selection study for a new landfill.,site. ,The entire County was
reviewed and siting criteria' applied resulting in five of the top
.sites being presented,to the Henderson County Commissioners in a
final report. `The County has taken this 'information and will soon
be contacting property owners.on at least two of the top sites for
permission to conduct further on -site, evaluations.,. It is
anticipated that we"will be .ready for the State. Task Force to look
at these sites in early July, 1993.., It is requested that time be
scheduled. for a visit by the Task Force to. Henderson County in
early July. By that time we fee'l that information will be
available on the proposed 'sites such that' the Task Force 'can make
recommendations concerning the suitability, . of these 'sites for the
new._solid waste disposal facility..
SITE UTILIZATION STUDY
I left with you a copy.gf a recent'.site utilization study of
the existing Stoney. Mountain Road Landfill. Under the. -current
permit and mode of operation, 'we have estimated that "th.e landfill
will be near ,its permitted,capacity.:by.`early'19"94.''The, `site
� y
*' Printed on Recycled Paper "

✓ .r l I ) r, r ..._ J i ..t
\ 7' , Y f f G^, \ L 1 ,
f• { -, r , r t1 I 1
_ , .> r . :'7 } 1 t . I -,, 1 I r it r { ';) 1
Nis Sheri .Hoytt ` "` }'
April : 26 19.93- ' , r 4,
t r. }
Pagew, ThreeO.
•.•
the area' near. ?the stop of the site -.It i•s our recommen'dation.. that
-the.County establish a"gas collection sy•stem'(most probably active.
systems) :';and .d'isposal :off th.e methan'e(gas,- (f'lari$g) '% . Marketing of ."
the methane gas wi l also `be inVest'igated '
, ,
x
.,.
GROUNDWATER .MONITOR
With respect; to .ground water monitoring, we .have discussed,
with Bobby Lu:ftey the need ;for Tnonitorin,g weils' that are :shallower:
and 'c •oser to .'t• he ,active landf i11 area It is our. intent. to submit'
an''updated "monitoring. plan ;with Sthe } c'1'osuze;plan:'
It •is requested. that the Division approve of the use of the
alternative. daily. cover and; advise ,us how-you-wish,to..proceed'with
the. permits modification: to`;uti - ze the air space above the existing ,
recycling. 'area Should there . be' %hy ,q, e.E., ons or if -you_.need
assi`s'talice, please'>conta' t .'bur office at 70�-697'=7334.
r '� k / -
).
r Sincerely`.you�rs;
•[ r / I M i �Y r
f 1 W ��. �� r ( I'}t
1 t � t- !. ). L- ij y
i
:, Gary T.
Tweed, PTE ! i A
t r 'r to Y' t ,
C'c David Thompson ) �" r r
Jim Patterson Y �- 4 L ;,;' �) �,� -
I
.� - , ro r
Bobby'Luftey 't r
> '= tr 1' i .d, i{ - / Jilh a ! 1 r ,
Gary Ahlberg � , �, , ,L:) ,,,.,, ti
1 -t _ f t F �i� �, Ff - ! i. f\.4_ tii �� ,' i S r 1
J ,r - ,') �L' )) r1i �'4 hr.fi , } 1— S / r J / ` t I 2 \ :, \
-/ h I F -fi lyr i t jS7 J at c r - r( r t,
i ( >, r ` ,,. , f T� 1 t Slr j rf L\ N = i t I Y
t : \ f °` �, i'yr•7.1s,1 ) Na rl. i c3? 't, s', r }--,, ' ) I r 1 \� t
• , = 1 J r) , - Z) Jit 15 1, .y Y/�It r -t ) i, -
• , 1, F - } Ir , \ - C I .1 111 �1,I ;) � t� 'lr rf �lfl Vi '! a 4/1 .1 .i t '
tr s�.. / / , r
Y I r1 , --\ {= P a C tr f ! 1 , 1 f I •r
\ Y ' I.% )., ' f.f� o? a ) J >,L , rti. ,I 1r J rl '!, , } / J r
.i „ 4 r r l 1. n 1J r1�4i - a r '• r t
ri \ J /' 1 _a 4 t '.L. .r 1'k. d1 /�olr' Y 't (' -) I57' / t 1 L r a ; `
�. - 1r7 t t <u 4i+ I,, t' t.J li a'. L 5 t l5. �. ' ,
r 4- 4 -}1 i ._. d. i
sJ, S. 1). (:.T }>t -} l It J_. !L K r 4 4' 1 -T I ,
I\ d Y {
`,i ,' \J a). / Pp %J 1 1Y +" /YJ,•yti+i\'1.i r t
,, ) r , ,,v 'J 1, , ,, jj ii 1 !
r H t� r, r , ?—) �� 1eif 5: 1r l L l
t.t ,. F ,' T 7y t.,i e� - ,i ,;t ,1,Y} k'V",,I \ L s. ' 1 f• S r `
1 i it I J a ') l} .4 ! , f I 1_ ,_ •f r .a 1
i I r *L r! 1) 0 L L 1 ` .')• P } r L. 1,
' 1 1 - E,it }
1 }rtf V, L \ r Y r
tr ,' ;r 1r: ''.. t ). s ,1 h= /a _.e , '_I, I 1 1
r 1 i ,� Jf L 4 r} 1
a
1 1 ' , ' lL, L,I ( I tF'. t) f ,- 1 , ' �F. )1,
-1 J`r_ 1 ,) i -y L -t,✓ ) #_ ir. f. 1� -115 `)_�i S'
);i ,

ELDON OWEN
SOLID WASTE DIRECTOR
697-4505
October 6, 1993
Mr. Jim Coffey
N.C. Solid Waste
P.O. Box 27687
��NOERSON COON
ly
1
\ 11
`OONDEO �8�/
HENDERSON COUNTY
SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT
802 Stoney Mountain Road
Hendersonville, NC 28739
Section
Raleigh, N.C. 27611
Ref: Stoney Mountain Road Landfill
Henderson County
Dear Mr. Coffey:
NIPPY PAGE
INTEGRATED
SOLID WASTE PLANNER
697-4877
Mr. Jim Patterson with your staff has requested this letter to
address the current status with the Henderson County Stoney
Mountain Road Landfill. It is our intention to continue operating
this landfill past October 9, 1993 in accordance with applicable
State, Federal, and County rules and regulations. We have
requested our consultant William G. Lapsley and Associates, P.A. to
develop a proposal for the preparation of the Transition Plan. It
is our understanding the Transition Plan is due by April 9, 1994.
At this time a specific closure date for the landfill has not been
established. Henderson County is in the process of siting a new
landfill and we do plan to close the Stoney Mountain Road Landfill
on or before the required January 1, 1998 closure date. At this
time with the current solid waste load and operating conditions we
should be able to remain in the current site until at least mid to
late 1996. As you are aware conditions in the solid waste industry
are constantly changing and the 1996 expected closure date could be
extended. We intend to try and pin point a more exact closure date
with the development of the Transition Plan.
We hope this information is sufficient as requested by Mr.
Patterson. It should be noted that your staff has not responded to
our request to utilize an alternative daily cover and return to the
1982 approved fill contours allowing filling of the air space above
our recycling center. It is our intention to proceed with this
plan of action unless directed otherwise. Should there be any
questions do not hesitate to contact our office at 704-697-4505.
Sincerely yours,
Eldon T. Owens
cc David Thompson
Gary Tweed

State of North Cr -Ana
Department of E, , ✓ironment,
Health and Natural Resources
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
November 2, 1993
Mr. David Thompson
Henderson Co. Manager
100 N. King Street
Hendersonville, NC 28739
RE: Methane Gas Remediation at Henderson County Landfill
Dear Mr. Thompson:
It has been determined that the plans submitted to the North Carolina Solid Waste
Section for installation of a methane gas migration control system at the Henderson County
Landfill (Permit #45-01) are adequate. A compliance date of Janua 1 1994 has been
established for this system to be installed and operational.
cc:
Please call me at 704/251-6208 if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
James E. Patterson
Waste Management Specialist
Julian Foscue
Jan McHargue
Jim Coffey
Eldon Owen
Intrrchange Building, 59 Woodfin Place, Asheville, N.C. 28R01 • Telephone [phone]
An Eriml nrpnrttn+iry Affirmative Actinn Employer

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
512 North Salisbury Street • Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Division of Solid Waste Management
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor 919-733-0692
Jonathan h Howes, Secretary
March 2, 1993
Mr. David F. Thompson, Manager
Henderson County
100 North King Street
Hendersonville, NC 28792-5092
RE: Henderson County Landfill, Permit No. 45-01
Compliance Order: Combustible gas concentrations
Phase I Initial Monitoring
Dear Mr. Thompson:
Our staff has had several conversations with Lapsley & Associates concerning the scope of the
gas migration problem and the investigation to define the problem. The Section generally agrees
with the scope of the initial monitoring plan as described in Lapsley's 16 Dec 92 letter with the
following additions:
1. The area of investigation should be expanded to include the subject property line
from A -A', the monitoring zone, as illustrated on the attached map.
2. Monitoring probes should be established at or inside the existing property line and
equally spaced to measure gas concentrations along the monitoring zone. It may
be useful to install probes in the landfill near, the hot area to assess the gas
generating potential of the landfill.
3. Data gathered from the probes at each monitoring event should include:
♦ barometric pressure and weather conditions
♦ probe pressure (inches of water)
4. Soil boring investigations should extend to the depth of the water table, landfill
excavation (if known), or bedrock, whichever is encountered first.
P.O. Box 27687, Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 Telephone [phone] Fax # [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

5. The scope of investigation should identify any potential preferred paths (natural
and man-made) for gas migration, i.e. pipeline or utility trenches, continuous gas
permeable soil zones, etc. Boring logs, probe completion records, and other
pertinent information should be documented and submitted with the proposed
remediation or corrective action plan.
6. The recommendations in Mr. Patterson's 16 Feb 93 letter should be included in
this investigation.
The option of adding property along the monitoring zone discussed previously could be
considered as part of a corrective action plan, but would not affect the current requirement to
define the scope of the migration problem. Please advise Mr. Patterson as you proceed with this
investigation.
Sincerely,
Gary . Ahlberg, Enviro ental Engineer
Solid Waste Section
cc: —Tim Patterson
Jan McHargue
Jim Coffey
Julian Foscue
Lapsley & Associates

William G. Lapsley & Associates, P.A.
Engineering, Surveying and Land Planning
1635 Asheville Highway
Post Office Box 546
Hendersonville, North Carolina 28793
704-697-7334 FAX [phone]
February 26, 1993
Mr. Gary Ahlberg
Solid Waste Section
Division of Solid Waste Management
P.O. Box 27687
Raleigh, N.C. 27611-7687
Ref: Phase I Initial.Monitoring Program
Landfill Gas Remediation.Plan
'Henderson County Landfill,
Stoney Mountain Road-
Henderson County, N.C.
Dear Mr. Ahlberg:
- Hendersonville
William G. Lapsley, P.G.
Gary Tweed, P.E.
Stacy K. Rhodes, R.L.S.
Steven L. Waggoner, R.L.S.
G. Marcus 6rittain, R.L.S.
Sylva
Donald L. Hunley, P.G.
On December 16, 1992, a proposed phase I monitoring plan to begin a landfill
gas remediation 'plan at the Henderson County Landfill was submitted to your
Division with request that it be reviewed and authorization issued to proceed.
To date there has been no response to the proposed plan of action by the Division
of Solid Waste Management. We have discussed this with Mr. Jim Patterson of your
office and advised him of our plans to proceed with the Phase I monitoring.
We have recommended to the County that they purchase a landfill gas monitor.
It is our understanding that they are proceeding with the acquisition of a
monitor. We have received quotes on the installation of landfill gas monitoring
probes from one Company and are planning to obtain additional quotes. Once final
costs are determined for the monitoring probes, we are recommending that the
County proceed with their installation as planned. In addition to the plan
submitted December 16, 1992, we are planning to install an additional probe in
the ,area of the animal shelter which is experiencing some detection of gas. The
site of the animal shelter is such that it maybe above old waste fill areas.
Borings into this area are to be conducted to determine the location of waste,
if any.
The input from your Division on our landfill gas remediation plans is
needed: The County feels that they need to proceed with remediation and would
like your input prior to installation of the monitoring probes. It is requested
that the Division provide comments on the proposed plan of action by March 14,
1993. Should there be any questions.regarding this matter, do not hesitate to
contact our office at 704-697-7334.
Sincerel yours,
Gary T. Tweed, P.E.
cc: David Thompson
Jim Patterson ✓
® Printed on Recycled Paper

STATE o
F-
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
Division of Solid Waste Management
P.O. Box 27687 ' Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687
James G. Martin, Governor
William W. Cobey, Jr., Secretary
January 5, 1993
Mr. David F. Thompson
County Manager
Henderson County
100 N. King Street
Hendersonville, NC 28739
Re: Your letter of December 11, 1992
Phase I initial methane monitoring program
Henderson County Sanitary Landfill (Permit #45-01)
Dear Mr. Thompson:
William L. Meyer
Director
In response to your letter of December 11, 1992, requesting
additional time to complete the Phase I methane monitoring and
proposed remediation plan at the Henderson County Landfill, we are
clarifying the "Compliance Order Without Administrative Penalty" as
follows:
1. Phase I is an initial monitoring program which will
assess the magnitude of the violation. The monitoring
program is to be evaluated and verified by a licensed
professional engineer. The professional Engineer's
proposals for probe locations and testing protocol shall
be submitted to Gary Ahlberg, Environmental Engineer,
N.C. Solid Waste Section, P.O. Box 27687, Raleigh, NC
27611 for review/approval not later than February 15,
1993.
2. Phase III will constitute the development and
implementation of a remediation plan based on Phase I
data. A compliance date for Phase II will be established
at the time Phase I data is reviewed by the Section.
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

Mr. David T. Thompson
January 5, 1993
Page 2
If the Section may provide further clarification or information,
please advise.
Sin ely,
X/
Dexter R. Matthews, Chief
Solid Waste Section
DRM/mju
cc: C7Ary Ahlberg
James E. Patterson
Julian M. Foscue, III
Janis D. McHargue

VOLLIE G. GOOD
CHAIRMAN
J. MICHAEL EDNEY
HUGH D. RANDALL
WILLIAM McKAY
RENEE KUMOR
November 19, 1993
HENDERSON COUNTY
BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
100 NORTH KING STREET
HENDERSONVILLE, N.C. 28792-5097
PHONE [phone]
FAX [phone]
Mr. Jim Patterson
N. C. Division of Solid Waste Management
59 Woodfin Street
Asheville, North Carolina 28801
RE: Henderson County Landfill
Permit No. 45-01
Landfill Gas Remediation
Stoney Mountain Road
Henderson County
Dear Mr. Patterson:
DAVID F. THOMPSON
COUNTY MANAGER
This office is in receipt of your November 2, 1993 letter concerning approval of the
Phase I Landfill Gas Remediation Study. However, your approval of plans for
construction, we feel, is premature.
As you were informed by our consultant Mr. Gary T. Tweed, P.E. on November 16,
1993, the preliminary site plan for a gas collection system and flare station is not the full
system design. The County is just now finalizing contractual agreements with Cargan
Resources, Inc. and as indicated in their September 29, 1993 letter (copy attached) to Mr.
Gary Ahlberg with your Raleigh .office, it is not expected to have the system designs
completed, approved, and construction completed before the second quarter of 1994.
On November 15. 1993, our staff held a full day meeting with Cargan Resources;
Inc. to finalize agreements. It was stated at this meeting that Cargan Resources, Inc.
plans to submit final design plans to your office very soon and, assuming approvals come
quickly, have the system under construction in January, 1994. It is hoped to have the
system completed and remediation underway by the end of April, 1994. This schedule
is contingent upon receipt of approvals, air permits, weather, etc. The County is pursuing
the installation of this project as quickly as possible. Substantial funds ($12,000 per
month for the first five years) are to be expended by the County for the construction and
operation of this system. We feel that this landfill gas remediation system could become
a model for future projects by other communities and care is being taken to insure the
installation of the best system possible.

Mr. Jim Patterson
November 19, 1993
Page Two
It is apparent that your office in Asheville is not receiving copies of submittals and
correspondences involving your Raleigh office. We will attempt to copy your office with
all future submittals. Should there be any, questions or if you need assistance, please
contact our office at [phone].
Sincerely,
David F. Thompson
Henderson County Manager
DFI-/abm
attachments
cc: Jim Coffey
Julian Foscoe
Skip Logan
Eldon Owen
Gary T. Tweed, P. E.

(Scargan
RESOUKES
INIC
YOUR NATURAL PARTNER
September 29, 1993
Mr. Gary Ahlberg
Solid Waste Section
Division of Solid Waste Management
PO Sox 27687
Raleigh, NC 27611-7687
Ref: Phase I, Landfill Gas Migration Assessment and
Monitoring Program, Landfill Gas Remediation Plan,
Stony Mountain 'Road Landfill, Henderson County, NC.
Dear Mr. Ahlberg:
We have concluded the captioned Phase I Program and
would like to provide you with a copy of our report and
supportive field data. This package of material includes
the following:
1. Our engineers report on the program with recommendations
for corrective action;
2. A report of two weeks continuous monitoring of the
landfill;
3. A report of well monitoring for the months of July and
August. September's report will be ready In one week, and
results will be forwarded to your office;
4. A permeability report of core samples taken from five
perimeter wells, provided by Core Labs;
5. A Landfill Gas generation model projecting emission
rates for the next 15 years;
6. A specification sheet on the Landfill Gas testing
equipment employed in our program; and,
7. A conceptual plan Indicating three landfill zones
requiring active migration control to achieve compliance
limits at specific perimeter monitor points.
There are several important aspects of our work which I
would like to briefly highlight.
POST OFFICE BOX 1078 CAMDEN, SOUTH CAROLINA 29020 PHONEIFAX: [phone]

1. Three areas on the landfill have been identified which
exceed the compl,.iance limits of 40 CFR 258.23, of the
Federal Code, and 15A NCAC 13B .1626 paragraph (4), of the
North Carolina Code, both dealing with Explosive Gases
Control. The affected areas include the northern boundary
centered on perimeter monitor well MP-5, the northwest
perimeter at MP-4, and the area underlying the Animal
Shelter at MP-2.
2. The estimiated daily Landfill Gas (LFG) generation rate
is 450,000 Standard Cubic Feet (SCF) per day from
approximately 770,000 tons of impounded waste. This LFG
rate should peak in the year 2000 at 650,000 SCF per day.
If another 300,000 tons of waste is added over the next
three years, then the LFG rate should peak at 1,000,000 SCF
per day by the year 2006.
3. Vacuum pressure tests were used to calculate impoundment
permeability at well site LP-6 (3.2*10 to -3 power). This
information together with core analysis (enclosed) from 5
monitor wells indicate sufficient permeability to allow for
relative ease of gas migration, unless inhibited by surface
features or subsurface structures.
4. To affect control of gas migration at the specified
zones and to reduce perimeter gas concentrations to
compliance limits, protective vacuum barriers under the
influence of LFG wells should be installed. Gas production
from these wells should equal approximately 60% of the
generation rate of the landfill to achieve desired control.
The primary means of destroying the gas should be with a
flare. Produced liquids should be destroyed by spray
injection into the flare shroud. Once control has been
established and compliance limits achieved, gas marketing
may prove feasible as a means of remediation cost subsidy.
5. The remediation system should initially employ a
variable speed electric motor and controls powering a
Positive displacement blower with output In the 500 CFM
range at 10-12 psig. The gas flare should be sized with
turn down capability to accommodate the entire range of
blower output. Maximum operating temperature of the flare
should be 1850 degrees Fahrenheit, and allow sufficient
retention time to achieve 98% destruction of Volatile
Organic Compounds.

6. Flared gas should be measured by digital flow meter.
Several additional monitor wells should be sited and
Installed. All'monitor wells should be tested daily at the
commencement of remedial operations until monitor wells are
within limits. Thereafter monitor wells should be tested
weekly to assure continued compliance.
We are concluding our agreements with Henderson County
before beginning the actual design and construction of the
proposed system. When our fi.;•st draft of plans and
specifications is completed, we will provide same to you for
comment. We hope to commence remedial operations early In
the second quarter of 1994. Should you have any question
or comments on our work thus far, or with what has been
outlined above, please advise.
Very truly yours,
`lJ\ 9 -A
Samuel Logan, r.
President
cc: David Thompson, Henderson County, NC ✓
Gary Tweed, Lapsley and Associates
Jim Clarkson, Cargan
Henry Barton, Cargan
enclosure

NC DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT, HEALTH AND NATURAL RESOURCES
Division of Solid waste Management
Solid waste Section
SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY EVALUATION REPORT
Type of Facility Permit * J V / Canty.
Name of Facility. Z&WC-V4QA1 Location
Date of Last Evaluation 41,2
I. Permit Conditions Followed Yes No N/A
A. Specific Condition(s) Violated
II. Operational Requirements Followed �Yes
No
15A N.C. Admin. Code 13B Section a 0 J o5
A. Specific Violation(s) by number and letter.
III. other Violations of Rule or Law u o 5V 7s ( � � � �l �� � cfA
IV. Evaluator's
V. Continuation Page Required? Yes o ReceivinLg Signature s.
Evaluation Date/'�,( s1 •� Solid Waste Sectim
DEHNR 3793 (Part I White: Facility Part II Canary: Central office Part III Pink: Regional Office)
Solid Waste Section (Review 7/%) U

NC DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT, HEALTH AND NATURAL RESOURCES
Division of Solid Waste Management
Solid Waste Section
SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY EVALLATION REPORT
r^
Type of Facility Y l tt}" fy
�' i i
Permi t *
Canty
Name of Facility�•til+�`sli�lS
Qfii'I�L;h��
Location`�f�,�t(!
Date of Last Evaluation
I. Permit Conditions Followed Yes No N/A
A. Specific Condition(s) Violated
II. Operational Requirements Followed Yes No
15A N-C. Admin. Code 138 Section e o 5 D
A. Specific Violation(s) by number and
Letter.
y✓y,20;n '�'l "y s2� yoy rL
III. Other Violations of Rule or Law t 5 t9 N k jq G )`3 i�5 . 05 D 3 C'4 ` a ) /I G/ytefJRd
a%G-fP`e111.LC e GL .» �.'l}�Cit (►('.�ycSteYy["C"i _lC
IV. Evaluator's Comments YV011J2 Fes" f,4s�j lAY dL (t�`t. ;'Yea,
b^r°'.;tiA1d-
V. Contimiation Page Required? Yes No Receiving Signature !j
Evaluation Date Solid Waste Section
DEHNR 3793 (Part I White: Facility Part II Canary: Central Office Part III Pink: Regional Office)
Solid Waste Section (Review 7PA)

NC DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT, HEALTH AND NATURAL RESOURCES
Division of Solid Waste Management
Solid Waste Section
SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY EVALUATION REPORT
jj
Type of Faci I ity. I,: 9-
Permit # county.
Name of Facility y sov,-61,? Location
Date of Last Evaluation
I. Permit Conditions Followed Yes No N/A
A. Specific Condition(s) Violated
II. Operational Requirements Followed Yes No
15A N.C. Admin. Code 138 Section
A. Specific Violation(s) by number and Letter.
III- Other Violations of Rule or Law L 3
B SZ -2,
fJ
IV. Evaluator's Comments
t', fly
ry
V. ContinLiation Page Required?
Yes
, I
No Receiving Signature
Evaluation Date Solid Waste Section
DEHNR 3793 (Part I White: Facility Part II Canary: Central Office Part III Pink: Regional Office)
Solid Waste Section (Review 7/94)

State of North Car,_-na
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Environmental Management
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
A. Preston I loward, Jr., P.E. Director
WATER QUALITY_ SECTION
August 4, 1993
Mr. David Thompson, County Manager
Henderson County
100 North King Street
Hendersonville, North Carolina 28792
Subject: NOTICE OF VIOLATION
Henderson County Landfill
Henderson County
Dear Mr. Thompson:
The Henderson County landfill has beendocumented violating North
Carolina Water Quality Standards for the following parameters:
Cadmium, Chromium, Lead, Mercury and Turbidity. On March 18, 1993,
representatives from this Agency investigated potential water quality
violations from the Henderson County landfill. Three of the
sedimentation/erosion control ponds were inspected, the two lower ponds
as you enter the landfill and the upper pond on the far side of the
landfill away from DOT'S property. The two lower ponds were full of
sediment and were discharging turbid water into the creek. The upper
pond's valve at the bottom of the riser was completely open, and
discharging turbid water even though this pond still had sediment holding
capacity. Water Quality representatives discussed these conditions with
the Landfill Supervisor and requested immediate action. Considering the
potential water quality problems that were occurring, Land Quality
Section and Solid Waste Management Division were notified.
Two months later on May 11, 1993, hither investigation revealed
that the problem was not corrected and waF-r_ samples were obtained.
Samples were obtained on and below tribiitaries that originate at the
landfill. The samples taken _indicate se rirn,q water quality violations.
The existence of the above described water quality violations,
subjects the responsible party to enforcement procedures. Section
143-215.6 of the General Statutes of North Carolina details enforcement
procedures which may be implemented. Each day this violation occurs
constitutes a separate offense for which penalties up to $10,000.00 per
day per water quality standard violation can be assessed.
IntctrhanRc Building, 59 Woodfin Place, Asheville, NC. 28801 • Telephone 7M-251-6208
An I -dual ( )pportunuv Allirmativc Action Ernplrrycr

David Thompson
August 4, 1993
Page Two
The landfill needs serious attent-.i-n in order to satisfy water
quality considerations now and in the fnt-m-e. Given that this Agency
plans to continue water quality sampling, fines can continue to be
assessed for each violation. It is recommended that renewed
attention be directed to the sedimentation/erosion control program so
that the permanent control of sediment and contaminants from the landfill
can be addressed and that further contaminati-on of water quality can be
avoided.
Please respond in writing by September
actions that are being taken to correct: Flies -
questions concerning this matter contact Ms.
number 704/251-6208, FAX number 704/251-6452.
toward satisfactory resolution of this prn1-)1em
xc: Henderson County
Linda S. Wiggs /
Paul R. WhiteJ
Jim Patterson
Dennis Owenby
Sincerely,
6, 1993, describing the
problems. If you have any
Linda Wiggs at telephone
Your cooperation in working
is appreciated.
/fo�yM. avis, Regional Supervisor
Division of Environmental Management
Health Department

ELDON OWEN
SOLID WASTE DIRECTOR
697-4505
HENDERSON COUNTY
SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT
802 Stoney Mountain Road
Hendersonville, NC 28739
August 9, 1993
Mr. Roy M. Davis
N.C. Division of Environmental Management
59 Woodfin Place
Asheville, N.C. 28801
Ref: Henderson-Councy Landfill
802 Stoney Mountain Road
Notice of Violation
Dear Mr. Davis:
7 2 1994 3 NIPPY PAGE
INTEGRATED
SOLID, WASTE PLANNER
697-4877
The referenced notice of violation was received August 5, 1993
from your Department concerning water quality violations for
Cadmium, Chromium, Lead, Mercury, and Turbidity. We are very
concerned that you feel that the landfill is in violation and offer
the following information:
1. As required by the Division of Solid Waste and the Division of
Earth Resources, the sediment control aspects of the landfill
require periodic dredging of sediment control basins on the site.
These basins were in the process of being cleaned during the visits
by your staff. Currently, the basins are being dredged as needed
on the order of two to three times per year. Since the basins are
impoundments of surface water drainage courses on the site there
will be some increase in turbidity during these cleaning
activities. Since only the two lower ponds are requiring cleaning,
it is felt that these basins can be cleaned in such a manner as to
-; ii -;::i .�J e�'i or i-^ 4ieµ surface �n:uters T basins aYP now
oe d;.T,-nt losshe N
dredged and functioning very well in maintaining sediments on site.
2. As part of the site monitoring program, there are four on -site
ground water monitoring wells and four streams which are sampled
twice per year for various parameters including those addressed in
your notice., None of the self -monitoring data indicate any levels
of contamination as indicated in the notice. It is requested that
copies of this monitoring data be sent to our office for review
along with specific sampling locations identified. In addition, it
would be helpful to know if samples were filtered for sediment
prior to analysis. Our current self -monitoring program has shown

,5rare or I\lorth Laroiina
--' -Departmenf of Environment,
v Health and Natural Resources
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
November 2, 1993
Mr. David Thompson
Henderson Co. Manager
100 N. King Street
Hendersonville, NC 28739
A&4
�EHiVF�
RE: Methane Gas Remediation at Henderson County Landfill
Dear Mr. Thompson:
It has been determined that the plans submitted to the North Carolina Solid Waste
Section for installation of a methane gas migration control system at the Henderson County
Landfill (Permit #45-01) are adequate. A compliance date of January 1. 1994 has been
established for this system to be installed and operational.
Please call me at 704/251-6208 if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
James E. Patterson
Waste Management Specialist
cc: ulian Foscue
Jan McHargue
Jim Coffey
Eldon Owen
Intcrt:hanRe Building, 59 Woodfin Place, A& -Ale, N.C. 28R01 • Telephone 7IN-251-6208
An Fqual nvpnmmiry Affirmative Artion Emplfryer

A 1,r SfATF'v
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
512 North Salisbury Street • Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Division of Solid Waste Management
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor 919-733-0692 Jonathan R Howes, Secretary
March 2, 1993
Mr. David F. Thompson, Manager
Henderson County
100 North King Street
Hendersonville, NC 28792-5092
RE: Henderson County Landfill, Permit No. 45-01
Compliance Order: Combustible gas concentrations
Phase I Initial Monitoring
Dear Mr. Thompson:
Our staff has had several conversations with Lapsley & Associates concerning the scope of the
gas migration problem and the investigation to define the problem. The Section generally agrees
with the scope of the initial monitoring plan as described in Lapsley's 16 Dec 92 letter with the
following additions:
1. The area of investigation should be expanded to include the subject property line
from A -A', the monitoring zone, as illustrated on the attached map.
2. Monitoring probes should be established at or inside the existing property line and
equally spaced to measure gas concentrations along the monitoring zone. It may
be useful to install probes in the landfill near. the hot area to assess the gas
generating potential of the landfill.
3. Data gathered from the probes at each monitoring event should include:
♦ barometric pressure and weather conditions
♦ probe pressure (inches of water)
4. Soil boring investigations should extend to the depth of the water table, landfill
excavation (if known), or bedrock, whichever is encountered first.
P.O. Box 27687, Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 Telephone [phone] Fax # [phone]I3
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

5. The scope of investigation should identify any potential preferred paths (natural
and man-made) for gas migration, i.e. pipeline or utility trenches, continuous gas
permeable soil zones, etc. Boring logs, probe completion records, and other
pertinent information should be documented and submitted with the proposed
remediation or corrective action plan. r
6. The recommendations in Mr. Patterson's 16 Feb 93 letter should be included in
this investigation.
The option of adding property along the monitoring zone discussed previously could be
considered as part of a corrective action plan, but would not affect the current requirement to
define the scope of the migration problem. Please advise Mr. Patterson as you proceed with this
investigation.
Sincerely,
4.11,
Gary . Ahlberg, Enviro ental Engineer
Solid Waste Section
cc: Jim Patterson
Jan McHargue
Jim Coffey
Julian Foscue
Lapsley & Associates

� * • �� �ATf o .
LWqq 1 � ID:
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
Division of Solid Waste Management
P.O. Box 27687 - Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687
James G. Martin, Governor
William W. Cobey, Jr., Secretary
January 5, 1993
Mr. David F. Thompson
County Manager
Henderson County
100 N. King Street
Hendersonville, NC 28739
Re: Your letter of December 11, 1992
Phase I initial methane monitoring program
Henderson County Sanitary Landfill (Permit #45-01)
Dear Mr. Thompson:
William L. Meyer
Director
In response to your letter of December 11, 1992, requesting
additional time to complete the Phase I methane monitoring and
proposed remediation plan at the Henderson County Landfill, we are
clarifying the "Compliance Order Without Administrative Penalty" as
follows:
1. Phase I is an initial monitoring program which will
assess the magnitude of the violation. The monitoring
program is to be evaluated and verified by a licensed
professional engineer. The professional Engineer's
proposals for probe locations and testing protocol shall
be submitted to Gary Ahlberg, Environmental Engineer,
N.C. Solid Waste Section, P.O. Box 27687, Raleigh, NC
27611 for review/approval not later than February 15,
1993.
2. Phase IIJI will constitute the development and
implementation of a remediation plan based on Phase I
data. A compliance date for Phase II will be established
at the time Phase I data is reviewed by the Section.
An Equal Opportunity Affirmadve Action Ernployer

Mr. David T. Thompson
January 5, 1993
Page 2
If the Section may provide further clarification or information,
please advise.
Sin ely,
Dexter R. Matthews, Chief
Solid Waste Section
DRM/mju
i
cc: Gary Ahlberg
James E. Patterson
`-�ulian M. Foscue, III
Janis D. McHargue

VOLLIE G. G000
CHAIRMAN
J. MICHAEL EDNEY
HUGH D. RANDALL
WILLIAM McKAY
RENEE KUMOR
November 19, 1993
Mr. Jim Patterson
HENDERSON COUNTY
BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
100 NORTH KING STREET
HENDERSONVILLE, N.C. 29792-5097
PHONE [phone]
FAX [phone]
N. C. Division of Solid Waste Management
59 Woodfin Street
Asheville, North Carolina 28801
RE: Henderson County Landfill
Permit No. 45-01
Landfill Gas Remediation
Stoney Mountain Road
Henderson County
Dear Mr. Patterson:
US; Of\,-
DAVID F. THOMPSON
COUNTY MANAGER
n,, r�
I ti) "lo
„r
r
tr
This office is in receipt of your November 2, 1993 letter concerning approval of the
Phase I Landfill Gas r;emediation Study. However, your approval of plans for
construction, we feel, is premature.
As you were informed by our consultant Mr. Gary T. Tweed, P.E. on November 16,
1993, the preliminary site plan for a gas collection system and flare station is not the full
system design. The County is just now finalizing contractual agreements with Cargan
Resources, Inc. and as indicated in their September 29, 1993 letter (copy attached) to Mr.
Gary Ahlberg with your Raleigh office, it is not expected to have the system designs
completed, approved, and construction completed before the second quarter of 1994.
On November 15, 1993, our staff held a full day meeting with Cargan Resources,
Inc. to finalize agreements. It was stated at this meeting that Cargan Resources, Inc.
plans to submit final design plans to your office very soon and, assuming approvals come
quickly, have the system under construction in January, 1994. It is hoped to have the
system completed and remediation underway by the end of April, 1994. This schedule
is contingent upon receipt of approvals, air permits, weather, etc. The County is pursuing
the installation of this project as quickly as possible. Substantial funds ($12,000 per
month for the first five years) are to be expended by the County for the construction and
operation of this system. We feel that this landfill gas remediation system could become
a model for future projects by other communities and care is being taken to insure the
installation of the best system possible.

Mr. Jim Patterson
November 19, 1993
Page Two
It is apparent that your office in Asheville is not receiving copies of submittals and
correspondences involving your Raleigh office. We will attempt to copy your office with
all future submittals. Should there be any, questions or if you need assistance, please
contact our office at [phone].
Sincerely,
David F. Thompson
Henderson County Manager
DFT/abm
attachments
cc: Jim Coffey
viulian Foscoe
Skip Logan
Eldon Owen
Gary T. Tweed, P. E.

l • Cam' ♦�
Rk]�URffS
YOUR NATURAL, PAR'INM
September 29, 1993
Mr. Gary Ahlberg
Solid Waste Section
Division of Solid Waste Management
PO Box 27687
Raleigh, NC 27611-7687
Ref: Phase I, Landfill Gas Migration Assessment and
Monitoring Program, Landfill Gas Remedi•ation Plan,
Stony Mount -in Road Landfill, Henderson County, NC.
Dear Mr. Ahlberg:
We have concluded the captioned Phase I Program and
would like to provide you with a copy of our report and
supportive field data. This package of material includes
the following:
I. Our engineers report on the program with recommendations
for corrective action;
2. A report of two weeks continuous monitoring of the
landfill;
3. A report of well monitoring for the months of July and
August. September's report will be ready In one week, and
results will be forwarded to your office;
4. A permeability report of core samples taken from five
perimeter wells, provided by Core Labs;
5. A Landfill Gas generation model projecting emission
rates for the next 15 years;
6'. A specification sheet on the Landfill Gas testing
equipment employed in our program; and,
7. A conceptual plan Indicating three landfill zones
requiring active migration control to achieve compliance
limits at specific perimeter monitor points.
There are several important aspects of our work which I
would like to briefly highlight.
POST OFFICE BOX T078 CAMDEN, SOUTH CAROLdNA 2<9020 PHONEIFAX: [phone]

1. Three areas on the landfill have been identified which
exceed the compliance limits of 40 CFR 258.23, of the
Federal Code, and 15A NCAC 13B .1626 paragraph (4), of the
North Carolina Code, both dealing with Explosive Gases
Control. The affected areas include the northern boundary
centered on perimeter monitor well MP-5, the northwest
perimeter at MP-4, and the area underlying the Animal
Shelter at MP-2.
2 The estimated daily Landfill Gas (LFG) generation rate
is 450,000 Standard Cubic Feet (SCF) per day from
approximately 770,000 tons of impounded waste. This LFG
rate should peak in the year 2000 at 630,000 SCF per day.
If another 300,000 tons of waste is added over the next
three years, then the LFG rate should peak at 1,000,000 SCF
per day by the year 2006.
3. Vacuum pressure tests were used to calculate impoundment
permeability at well site LP-6 (3.2'r10 to -3 power). This
information together with core analysis (enclosed) from 5
monitor wells indicate sufficient permeability to allow for
relative ease of gas migration, unless inhibited by surface
features or subsurface structures.
4. To affect control of gas migration at the specified
zones and to reduce perimeter gas concentrations to
compliance limits, protective vacuum barriers under the
influence of LFG wells should be installed. Gas production
from these wells should equal approximately 60, of the
generation rate of the landfill to achieve desired control.
The primary means of destroying the gas should be with a
flare. Produced liquids should be destroyed by spray
injection into the flare shroud. Once control has been
established and compliance limits achieved, gas marketing
may prove feasible as a means of remediation cost subsidy.
5. The remediation system should initially employ a
variable speed electric motor and controls powering a
Positive displacement blower with output in the 500 CF1rf
range at 10-12 psig. The gas flare should be sized with
turn down capability to accommodate the entire range of
blower output. Maximum operating temperature of the flare
should be 1850 degrees Fahrenheit, and allow sufficient
retention time to achieve 98% destruction of Volatile
Organic Compounds.

6. Flared gas should be measured by digital flow meter.
Several additional monitor wells should be sited and
installed. All 'monitor wells should be tested daily at the
commencement of remedial operations until monitor wells are
within limits. Thereafter monitor wells should be tested
weekly to assure continued compliance.
We are concluding our agreements with Henderson County
before beginning the actual design and construction of the
proposed system. When our first draft of plans and
specifications is completed, we will provide same to you for
comment. We hope to commence remedial operations early In
the second quarter of 1994. Should you have any question
or comments on our work thus far, or with what has been
outlined above, please advise.
Very truly yours,
Samuel Logan, r.
Prestdent
cc: David Thompson, Henderson County, NC ✓
Gary Tweed, Lapsley and Associates
Jim Clarkson, Cargan
Henry Barton, Cargan
enclosure

William G. Lapsley & Associate�s'
Engineering, Surveying and Land Pla'&n1*�Jl
G� g i
1635 Asheville Highway
Post Office Box 546 MAR
Hendersonville, North Carolina 28 93
704-697-7334 . FAX [phone]
February 26', 1993 iam G. Lapslev, P.E.
Gary Tweed, P.E.
Stacy K. Rhodes, R.L.S.
Steven L. Waggoner. R.L.S.
G. Marcus Brittain, R.L.S.
Sylva
Mr. Gary Ahlberg Donald L. Hurley, P.E.
Solid Waste Section
Division of Solid Waste Management.
P.O.'Box:27687
Raleigh, N.C. `2.7611-7687
Ref: Phase I Initial Monitorincj Program
Landfill Gas Remediation Plan
Henderson County Landfill
Stoney Mountain Road
Henderson County, N.C.
-Dear Mr. Ahlberg:
On December 16, 1992, a proposed phase I monitoring plan to begin a landfill
gas remediation *plan.'.at the Henderson County, Landfill was submitted to your
Division with request that it be reviewed and authorization issued to proceed.`
To date there has been no response to the proposed plan of action by the Division
of Solid Waste Management. we have discussed this with Mr. Jim Patterson of your
office and advised him of our plans to proceed with the Phase I monitoring.
We have recommended to the County that they purchase a landfill gas monitor.
it is our understanding that they are proceeding with the acquisition of a
monitor. We have received quotes on the installation of landfill gas monitoring
probes from one Company and are planning to obtain additional quotes.. Once final
costs are determined for the monitoring probes, we are recommending that the
County proceed .with their installation as planned. In addition to the plan
submitted December 16, 1992, we are planning to install an additional probe in
the•area of the animal shelter which is experiencing some detection of gas. The
site of the animal shelter is such that it may be above old waste fill areas.
Borings into this area are to be conducted to determine the location of waste,
if any.
The input from your Division on our landfill gas remediation plans is
needed' The County feels that they need to proceed with remediation and would
like your input prior to installation of the monitoring probes. It is requested
that the Division provide comments on the proposed plan of action by March 14,
1993. Should there be any questions regarding this matter, do not hesitate to
contact our office at 704-697-7334.
Sincerel yours
Gary T. Tweed, P.E.
cc: David Thompson'
Jim Patterson
�q `e Printed on Recycled Paper

William'G.' Lapsley Associates, P.A.
Engineering, Surveying and band Punning
16.35 Asheville Highway
i'ost Office Box 5,16
Hendersonville, Nollli Carolina 28793
704.697.7334 . FAX [phone]
April 26, :1993
Ms . S' hera. 1.10yt t
N.C. Divis,i,c)n of. Solid Waste Memagement
P.O, Box 27687
Rali�'igh, N.C. 27611-7687
,ef : jjend(�rson County Solid Waste Programs
Dear Ms. hoytt :
M-ndrrsr,nville
William 6, 1.apsk-y, 11.1:.
Cary Tweed, P.r'
Siary K, kluukes, X.I.S.
Sleven 1., WA}jgoiler. R.L.S.
G. hLITCO% Bril Win, RA,
.`wfra
1L,nakl L. Hunlrv, 1'.E.
1:ii fc_)1.1ow up to our meeting of April 23, 1993, I would like to
sumriari-z,e t;ho�;e arcas that we discussed with respect to the
Henderson Coi,inty Solid Waste Programs. Our meeting was very
.nformat.ive and the information 'gathered will b� helpful to our
firm assisting_ Henderson County with their. solid waste programs,
The two areas which we discussed were. the. selection of anew solid
wasto 1andfi 11 and the utilization of the existing landfill site on
stoney Mountain Road.
N—FW SITE mumLON Emig S5
Wa,.l.l _i,ram G. Lapsley and Associates, P.A. , has completed a site
st a,ecta,on study for a new landfill site. The entire County was
r.evie-wed and siting criteria applied resulting in five of the top
sites being. presented to the Henderson county commissioliers in
fl.nn.l. report- The County has taken this information and will soon
.�f contacti.ng property owners on atJ least twn of the top sites for
permission Lo conduct further on -site evaluations. .I.t .i_s
anticipated that we will. be ready for the State Task Force to look
at thcsc sites in early July, 1993. It is requested that; time he
�:,cheduled .for a vi,s,i.t by the Task Force to. Henderson County in
early iu1.y. By that time we. fee.]. that information will be
availat?le on ttic proposed sites such that the 'Task Force can make
re concerning the suitability of these sites for the
new --,olid waste disposal facility.
SITE UTILIZATION STUDY
ris.t:l: you a <<opy of a recent site utilization study c
e.::i^t il:Cj Stoney Mountain f: oad Landfill. Under the current
p<<rrrliL and nuodr� of operation, we have estimated that the landfill
will be near its permitted capacity by early 1994. The site
1 rinwd on Ru;'ydi!{ P"''Alr

14S. Sheri. Hoytt
April 26, .'993
Fame Two
ut,i-1,iz,ation study was conducted to .identify alternatives to extend
the u�-.ef_ul life of the .ex:isting site .to gain the time necessary for
,tile s,i.t2-ng, permitting, construction and start up of a new
1.andFI1 17. , ':'here. are several areas which 'we feel will improve the
existing opera Lion . Two (?.) specif*ic .items, however, will require
approv.-a.H by your office?. First, we havo recommended that the
County im-nodiate'ly begin, using 'an alternative daily cover., The
County was . given. permission ,:,ono . years ago to use . a tarp type
cover. This was attempted.and-used.until the tarp became unusable.
A new tarp way, not: purchased, aild' '.the .Practice discontinued.
Several alternative: covers have been. evaluated; and it was
recommended thal_ the. Fabrisol alte>"nat:i;ve cover .be purchased and
used .nstead of the daily soy l: ,cover. It:.is requested that. the
Division grant Hender,son.County.,appr'ova], to use an. alternate daily
cove?,- assF'abrisol or its equivalent, The se_.cond recommendation
wh i_c,h will require your D,i.v;ision . approval is a proposed
modification of the current permit to'allow the relocation of the
current recycling area - which is, on. top of _the existing landfill
base and. restructuring the 'landfill ..contours' to the west face;
all.ovji. ng °c)r addi tiona1 fill of . approximately 400,000 cy. This
will provide for aP.
roximately.one additional year of operation.
9ori,ng9 conducted at the site verified the existence of waste at
t.j:o reCyclin�4 area at 'apptoxl -tely. 1� feet.' deep: By utilizing
s air space, the top of the site can be extended to elevation.
241.0 approximately. 20 feet .above the : current . permit. As . we
d:iscus,ec,, Lhe Division may wish .to .Incorporate this change .into a
c:lo;ure plan for the existing landfill 'and not as an,application
for vertical expansioi:. Please- advise as to how the Division would
prefer L?ii request to be handled.
Othcr fc,commendatioris . made to Henderson County concerned the
schedial,:i„tag of w� ,t haulers,, control of working face area, and
other items ',_,O w<.aste compaction. The County has purchased
a tub gr,'i TAoT-, and this operation is proce'edi.ng very well. All of
tdie r.ec,omi-nendations, if 6nact.er_l, shotild give the County sufficient
.l.:i..L'e of the uxi,�.ting site to.all.ow t. i.me .for opening of a new
1ar:dlil.l . lt. is requested that ' thes.e oher proposed changes
receive the DIJ.v.i.s.ion's .approval.
METHANE GAS INVESTIGATION
With respect to landf.i-.11, methane gay compliance notice, we
have presented two proposals tothe County for the installation of
gas monztor ,ng well.s and preparation of a phase 7 evaluation and
report The escaping methane gas;appears to be very -active along
no*:�t•.hern side .of..t<he landfill from the animal shelter to

Ms.. Sheri Hoytt
April 26, 1993
Page Three
tho aarea near the .top .of t;he *site. It is our recommendation that
the County establish a gcZs 'collection .system (most probably active
systems) and disposal of the met han6'gas (flaring).- Marketing of
the methane gas will also be i,nve; ti'gat.ed.
GROUNDWATER-MORITOR
With r ex pect to ground water monitoring, we have disr_-ussed
w:',tli .Bobby Lufteiy the need for .monitoring wells that -are' shallower
-inc_l closer to the act~ivo landf,il,7,,dr'ea. It As -our intent to submit
ein updated moni.to;r-:ing plan. with the:. clo:sure Plan.
It is requeLeted that the Division approve of the use of the
alter. -native daily cover and advise us, how you wish -to. proceed'w,i.th
thc� Pee---•mit$modification to ui ilize*:the air space,above the existing
rec_-yc.ling area. Should there ' bF.'any questions or'if you need
assistance:., please coiitact our office at-,70.4-697-7334.
Sincerely -yours;
Gary; .T . , Twreed;
cc: David Thompson
Jim Patterson
Robby Luft~ey .
Gary Ahl.berg

r.. /
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
512 North Salisbury Street • Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor February lb, 1993 Jonathan 11 Howes, Secretary
Mr. David Thompson
Henderson County Manager
100 N. King Street
Hendersonville, NC 28739
RE: ' Combustible Gas Monitoring at Henderson Co. Animal Shelter
Dear Mr. Thompson:
In response to a request by Mr. Eldon Owen, Henderson County Solid Waste Director,
I conducted combustible gas monitoring inside the Henderson County Animal Shelter (located
on property at the Henderson County Landfill location) on the afternoon of February 11,
1993. No combustible gases were detected in any of the rooms of the shelter "proper," but
combustible gas was detected at levels up to 40 % lower explosive limits in the two rooms on
either side of the main lobby of the building where the plumbing pipes come through the
concrete slab. Readings indicating the presence of combustible gases were obtained only
when the monitoring probe was placed directly on the pipes.
Additional monitoring should be continued at the Animal Shelter on a regular basis and
efforts should be taken to ensure that the building is well ventilated for employee safety.
Remediation of any combustible gas problems will be based on an assessment derived
from the monitoring data obtained at this location.
Please call should you have any questions.
Sincerely,
James E. Patterson
JEP:a Waste Management Specialist
cc: Julian Foscue
\. Mr. Gary Ahlberg
Mr. Eldon Owen
Interchange Building, 59 Woodhn Place, Asheville, N.C. 28801 • Telephone [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

William G. Lapsley & Associates, P.A.
Engineering, Surveying and Land Plannin
1635 Asheville Highway
Post Office Box 546
Hendersonville, North Carolid 793
704-697-7334 . FAX 704-69 --733BIIY 0 7 110T)
R
Hendersbnvill
May 24, 1993 Wil{iam .Lapsley,P.E.
Gary' eed. P.E.
Iaty K. KOdes. R.L.S.
Steven L. Waggoner, R.L.S.
G. Marcus Brittain, R.L.S.
Sylva
Mr. Gary Ahlberg Donald L. Hanley, P.E.
Environmental Engineer.II
Solid Waste Section
NCDEHNR
P.O. Box 27687
Raleigh, N.C. 27611-7687
Ref: Phase I Landfill Gas Investigation
Stoney Mountain Road Landfill
Henderson County, N.C.
Dear Mr. Ahlberg:
Enclosed please find a copy of the Phase I Landfill Gas Investigation of the
Henderson County ..Stoney Mountain Road Landfill to be conducted by Cargan
Resources, Inc:It is anticipated that Cargan Resources will soon be installing
the landfill gas monitoringwell probes and begin the Phase I monitoring. This
plan of action has been developed over the past few months and expanded to cover
a much larger` area of the landfill than originally anticipated. Subsequent
investigations of the landfill migration indicated that landfill gas movement at
the site is over a larger area than indicated by the vegetation damage .on the
northeast portion of the site. The planned investigation is to take in the
northern side of the landfill from the animal shelter to beyond the upper zone
where original migration was detected.
Cargan Resources, Inc. will conduct the investigation under review of this
firm 'and develop the Phase II remediation plan of action. It is felt that the
Phase I remediation monitoring will be completed by the end of June, 1993, with
a final report to be completed by August, 1993. It is felt that with concurrence
of your office that a Phase II remediation plan can be developed and in place by
early 1994.
It is requested that you review the planned Phase I ,landfill gas
investigation plan. Should you feel that any area of concern has not been
addressed and the plan is not adequate, then please contact us immediately.
Otherwise, Henderson County and Cargan Resources, Inc. plan to proceed with this
plan of action. Should there be any questions or if you need assistance, please
contact our office at 704-697-7334.
Since ely yours,
ii� v '�
Gary Tweed, P.E.
cc David Thompson
.Samuel Logan, Jr.
Julian Foscue
t$ Printed on Recycled Paper