Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout4407_ROSCANS_2010HAYWOOD COUNTY MSW LANDFILL PERMIT # 44-07 HAYWOOD COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA FACILITY COMPLIANCE AUDIT REPORT June 11, 2010 STATUS OF PAST NOTED VIOLATIONS: ONGOING: 15A NCAC 13B .1626 (2)(c) for failure to replace the minimum of one,foot of intermediate soil cover over exposed waste resultingfrom activities in August 2009. In order to achieve compliance, Haywood County must, within 14 days, submit, in writing, a plan to address the lack of intermediate soil cover. This plan should be submitted to the Solid Waste Section Permitting Branch, Allen Gaither, at the Asheville Regional Office. RESPONSE: The following description/plan of action describes the steps Haywood County intends to undertake to remedy the apparent exposed waste material along the interface tie-in between the existing Phase 2 Landfill Cell and the newly constructed Phase 3 Landfill Cell: Once the Permit To Operate is received for the Phase 3 Landfill Cell, the County intends to begin activities necessary to permanently remediate the apparent exposed waste material located along the Phase 2/Phase 3 interface. At the present time access to the area in question is somewhat limited and poses safety issues for the landfill staff and therefore only temporary measures have been attempted. In order to safely access the area in question, the County intends to construct a working platform, comprised of waste material and adequate daily cover, within the Phase 3 cell and along the entire length of the Phase 2 tie-in. This platform will provide working room and safe access to the apparent exposed waste along Phase 2. Once the platform within Phase 3 is constructed, waste material will be worked up and against the Phase 2 Landfill Cell to cover the apparent exposed waste as well as provide a gradual slope on which cover material can be placed to adequately cover any exposed waste and allow the controlled run off of stormwater. The County intends to complete all remediation activities associated with this plan of action within sixty (60) days fiom the date waste placement activities begin in Phase 3. However, additional time may be required depending on the volume and characteristics of the present daily waste stream. It should also be noted that the County may be required to operate two active working faces (Phase 2 and Phase 3) simultaneously due the makeup of the present waste stream. The County presently receives C&D type waste in its daily waste stream and this type of waste material should not be utilized for the construction of the initial layer of waste within a newly activated cell. C&D waste and other types of waste unacceptable for the construction of the initial waste layer will continue to be disposed of in Phase 2 until such time as the initial layer of waste within Phase 3 is complete. The initial step, after receiving the Permit To Operate, will be to remove a section of the temporary rain cover in Phase 3 along the western -most tie-in with Phase 2. This will be done in order to access the Phase 3 Landfill Cell and begin the placement of waste material in Phase 3 along the interface with Phase 2. The removal of the temporary rain cover will progress to the east as the initial layer of waste material is placed across the designated area. Daily cover will be placed at the end of each day's work, or more often as field conditions dictate. The amount of temporary rain cover to be removed will be detenxnined in the field each day as work progresses. Care will be exercised to ensure the initial layer of waste material does not contain any waste material that may cause damage to the liner system in Phase 3. Once the initial layer of waste is placed in Phase 3, subsequent layers of waste material will be placed and compacted until such time as the surface of the working platform reaches at least the elevation of the tie-in to Phase 2. Daily cover will be placed at the end of each day's work or more often as field conditions dictate. This will be done along the entire length of the Phase 2/Phase 3 tie-in. After the working platform is completed izf the Phase 3 Landfill Cell, the initial layer of waste material will be placed along the tie-in berm and worked up and against the exposed Phase 2 tie- in slope. Subsequent layers of waste will be place and compacted against the tie-in to Phase 2 to construct a slope generally matching the existing slope of the Phase 2 Landfill Cell; however, the slope shall be no steeper than two horizontal to one vertical (2:1). Daily cover will be placed at the end of each day's work or more often as field conditions dictate. Once the construction of the slope is complete, adequate cover material will be placed to ensure the complete coverage of waste and measures will be installed to control storinwater runoff. Sheet 1 of 2, included as an attachment to this description/plan of action, depicts a general layout of the working platform to be initially constructed within the Phase 3 Landfill Cell and the proposed tie-in to the existing exposed edge of the Phase 2 Landfill Cell. Sheet 2 of 2, also included as an attachment to this description/plan of action, depicts a general cross-section of the proposed working platform and subsequent tie-in to the exposed edge of the Phase 2 Landfill Cell. Exact .dimensions, elevations and slopes, etc. will be determined in the field as work progresses. The North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources (NCDENR) will be notified when work on this particular plan of action begins and will be kept updated on the work as it progresses. NCDENR will also be notified when the work is complete. Once this operation has been completed, the County will resume waste disposal operations in the Phase 2 Landfill Cell until such tune as available disposal space dictates moving the disposal operation to the Phase 3 Landfill Cell area. 0 umcGll A S S O C I A T E S Engineering • Planning C Finance McGill Associates, P.A. P.O. Box 2259, Asheville, NC 28802 55 Broad Street, Asheville, NC 28801 828-252-0575 Par 828-252.2518 PROJECT: AW W PROJECT NO.: 7,Q* DESCRIPTION: CALCULATED BY: CHECKED BY: DATE: 1e116 SHEET NO./ OF ® PROJECT: /'l!�/eea loP �+,yF j+ PROJECT NO.:mc H1 A S S O C I A T E S DESCRIPTION: eno--, AcA Engineering m Planning m Finance CALCULATED BY: &N-T CHECKED BY: RECEIVED MAR 10 2010 ,AICSOLID WASTE SECTION A Transmittal SNEVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE CM 5400 Glenwood Avenue Suite 300 Raleigh, North Carolina 27612 919 787-5620 Phone 919 781-5730 Fax To: Andrea Keller From: Mat Colone Organization/ NCDENR — Division of Waste Address: Management Date: March 8, 2010 2090 US Highway 70 Swannanoa, North Carolina 28778 Re: Buncombe County Substantial Amendment and Phase 5 PTC Application Job # Via: Response to Comments — Landfill Gas Monitoring Plan 6447-65973 Mail. XX Overnight: Enclosed please find: For your information For your review For your signature It Courier. - Approved Approved as noted Returned to you for correction Message: Andrea, Attached, please find 1 copy of the Response to Review Comments from Zinith Barbee's February 12, 2010 letter with applicable revisions and attachments for your files. If you have any questions, please feel free to call me at 919 787-5620 or email to colonemf@cdm.com Thanks, Mat Colone i' /l W Signed 5400 Glenwood Avenue, Suite 300 Raleigh, North Carolina 27612 tel: 919 787-5620 fax: 919 781-5730 March 5, 2010 Mr. Zinith Barbee Solid Waste Section North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources 401 Oberlin Road Suite 150 Raleigh, North Carolina 27605-1350 MAR 10 2010 SOLID WASTE SECTION ASHEVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE Subject: Site Hydrogeologic Report, Design Hydrogeologic Report, Water Quality Monitoring Plan, and Landfill Gas Monitoring Plan Buncombe County Solid Waste Management Facility Permit to Construct Application Substantial Amendment and Phase 5 C&D Landfill Response to Review Comments Permit No. 11-07 Dear Mr. Barbee: Camp Dresser & McKee (CDM), on behalf of Buncombe County, is pleased to submit this letter in response to the comments received in your letter dated February 12, 2009 (Doc ID 9634). Although not stated in the February 12th letter, CDM assumes this letter replaces your letter dated December 30, 2009 (Doc ID 9082) and includes responses to the comments presented in the February 12th letter. This letter contains responses and revisions as they apply to the Landfill Gas Monitoring Plan. The comments are addressed individually with discussions and references within this letter and the attachments. Solid Waste Section comments are provided in italics with CDM response directly following. A complete revised Landfill Gas Monitoring Plan is attached. Section 1 1. Revise the introduction to include the following information. Insert "aerobic" in the discussion to account for conditions in which explosions ignite and fires propagate. Identify gases expected to be generated from waste at this type of landfill. Correct the statement in which "no structures" are reported, since structures depicted on engineering drawings contradicts the statement. RESPONSE: T;\BunScombe-6447165973 C&D Substantial Amdmt\ReportsV4CDENR Response\PTC Responses\LGMP\Barbee_ Response_ Letter March 2010.doc COnSUILIng • engineering • COnStrUCtlOn • opera Mr. Zinith Barbee March 5, 2010 Page 2 1a. A sentence regarding aerobic conditions and the relation to ignitability and fire hazard has been added to Section 1. lb. A discussion was added to Section 1 identifying methane and hydrogen sulfide as gases that could potentially be generated from wastes in a C&D landfill. However, given the type of waste placed in a C&D landfill, the presence of methane is unlikely. Also, the amount of drywall in the Buncombe County waste stream that could potentially generate hydrogen sulfide is minimal. 1c. This sentence has been deleted. As stated in the report, the structures shown on the engineering drawings are currently monitored as part of the approved Subtitle D landfill gas monitoring plan. This plan is intended to monitor the C&D landfill only. 1.2 Include in the discussion hozv the composition of C&D landfill gas varies from MSW landfill gas, and list asphyxiation among the effects of "pollution" from landfill gas. RESPONSE: Section 1.2 has been revised to the following: "Landfill gas from MSW landfills is typically composed of 50 to 55 percent methane; 45 to 50 percent carbon dioxide; and, less than one percent non -methane organic compounds. These individual gases remain co -mingled and do not naturally separate. Because C&D wastes do not contain large quantities of organic matter, methane and carbon dioxide should not be a concern. However, if a significant amount of gypsum wallboard is present in C&D waste, hydrogen sulfide may potentially be produced, particularly if moisture is introduced into the waste." For the purpose of this response and the revised C&D landfill gas monitoring plan, "landfill gas" will include: Methane, hydrogen sulfide, carbon dioxide, carbon monoxide, oxygen, and nitrogen (as balance gas). Asphyxiation has been added to the discussion of potential effects of pollution from landfill gas. Section 2 2.1 Tzvo revisions are necessary. Somezvhere in the section; one, list Regulation 15ANCAC 13B .0554(fl to emphasize submission of "any other monitoring plan or program" and clarify that monitoring is not solely for methane; tzvo, explain that the generation of hydrogen sulfide and/or other gases is anticipated more than methane, unless there are particular reasons for high methane emissions too. RESPONSE: 2.1a A statement addressing Rule .0544(f) has been added indicating that the Landfill Gas Monitoring Plan is part of the Monitoring Plan for the C&D landfill. In addition to the P:\Buncombe • 6447\65973 C&D Substantial AmdmtXReports\NCDENR Response\PTC Responses\LGMP\Barbee_Response_Le"er March 2010.doc Mr. Zinith Barbee March 5, 2010 Page 3 Landfill Gas Monitoring Plan, the Facility Monitoring Plan includes the Water Quality Monitoring Plan. 2.1b Hydrogen sulfide has been added as a potential gas of concern for the C&D landfill. Section 3 3. In the introduction, replace "methane" with "landfill gas". In the second paragraph, explain that both federal and state regulations apply to the landfill. RESPONSE: The introduction stated landfill gas correctly. A sentence stating that both federal and state regulations apply to the landfill has been added. 3.1 Replace "'methane" with "methane gas or other explosive gases". Methane is stated in the cited "Rule however, in the regulation containing that "Rule" is also "other explosive gases" and "mixture of explosive gases in air that will propagate aflame". RESPONSE: Section 3.1 has been revised accordingly. 3.2 In both paragraphs, replace "methane" with "methane and other explosive gases" RESPONSE: Section 3.2 discussed personnel and staffing and was not applicable to the Plan as discussed in the Solid Waste Section rules. As such, it has been removed entirely. Following portions of Section 3 have been re -numerated accordingly in the revised Plan, however, for the purpose of this response letter they are discussed as referenced in the SWS review comments. 3.3 Three revisions are necessary. One, in the first sentence add that "the instrument" will be calibrated according to the manufacturer's instruction. Two, in the first and second paragraphs replace "methane" with "landfill gases". Three, correct the statement about structures and report that they are adjacent to the landfill. RESPONSE: 3.3a The first sentence has been revised accordingly. 3.3b All references to "methane" have been replaced with "landfill gas," where appropriate. 3.3c This sentence has been deleted. Structures are currently monitored under the approved monitoring plan for the Subtitle D landfill. 3.3.1 Required are several revisions to the text and referenced figure. One, either delete the last sentence in the section on page 3-1, since the referenced well is not pertinent to the current monitoring plan, or PABuncombe - 6447\65973 C&D Substantial Amdmt\Reporls\NCDENR Response\PTC Responses\LCMP\Barbee_ Response_ Letter_ March 2010.doc Mr. Zinith Barbee March 5, 2010 Page 4 show the well on Sheet 1 and include it in the plan for Phase 5. Two, throughout the section, replace "methane" with "landfill gas". Three, specifij that well depths will equal the thickness of waste strata. Four, explain that all the vadose zone, including bedrock above the watertable, will be screened; that screens will extend to seasonal high water elevations; and flooded wells will be replaced with dnj wells. Five, specifij well joints to be connected using threaded couplings in lieu of slip couplings, screwed couplings, and glued couplings. Six, specifij for wellheads caps with a stopcock hjpe valve that controls gas flow, that have a barb connection fitting the sampling instrument specified in the plan, and are of sufficient quality to facilitate sampling and calibration in accordance with industnj and federal standards. RESPONSE: 3.3.1a The last sentence on page 3-1 has been removed. 3.3.1b Throughout the section, "methane" has been replaced with "landfill gas" as appropriate. 3.3.1c Well depths equal to thickness of waste strata is not practical for the Buncombe County C&D landfill. The C&D landfill is a valley fill and there is little to no excavation beyond natural topography. Based on the topography, the base grades of the C&D landfill, the filling sequence and geology at the C&D landfill, the top of well casing elevations will be lower than the base of the C&D landfill. 3.3.1d At the C&D landfill, selected well locations are in or adjacent to low-lying drainage feature areas down -gradient of the landfill unit where seasonal high groundwater elevations are typically within the partially weathered rock or alluvium. The Buncombe County C&D landfill is being constructed such that there is little to no excavation and the bottom of waste will be at or near existing grade. As such, well screens in some cases will be 50-feet or more below the base of the C&D landfill. CDM believes that in the case of the Buncombe County C&D landfill, it is unreasonable to install landfill gas monitoring wells into the fractured bedrock. If groundwater data in fractured bedrock or other indicators such as distressed vegetation indicate that a landfill gas migration problem may exist, additional deeper monitoring wells may be installed to assess gas migration. Flooded wells will be replaced with dry wells, if necessary. 3.3.1e Reference that wells will be constructed with threaded joints has been added. PABuncombe - 6447\65973 C&D Substantial Amdmt\Reports\NCDENR Response\PTC Responses\LGMP\Barbee_Response_Letter_March 2010.doc k I J Mr. Zinith Barbee March 5, 2010 Page 5 3.3.1f Wellheads will be fitted with a quick -connect stop -cock -type fitting that is of sufficient quality to facilitate sampling in accordance with industry and federal standards. Figure 3-2 has been revised to show the wellhead completion. 3.3.2 Three revisions are necessary. One, everywhere in the section, replace "methane" with "methane and other explosive gases". Two, since specififing a particular instrument, state that, at a minimum, common landfill gases detectable by that instrument -CH4 and H2S -will be measured. Three, since conveying a sampling plan, explain that wells compromised by flooding will not be sampled. RESPONSE: 3.3.2a Throughout the section, "methane" has been replaced with "landfill gas," as appropriate. 3.3.2b The section has been revised to indicate that a GEM-2000 landfill gas meter or equivalent and an Industrial Scientific M-40 4-gas meter or equivalent will be used to monitor landfill gas in the wells. The 4-gas meter will be attached to the exhaust port of the GEM-2000. The GEM-2000 will detect CH4, CO2, 02, and the 4-gas meter will detect CH4 LEL, H2S, CO, and 02. 3.3.2c Given the historical groundwater data at the C&D site, it is not anticipated that well flooding will be an issue. If, however, it is determined that a well is flooded above the well screen elevation, that well will not be sampled and a new dry well will be installed in its place. 3.4 Replace "methane" with "methane and other explosive gases". RESPONSE: Section 3.4 has been revised such that "methane" has been replaced with "landfill gas," as appropriate. Sheets Sheet 1- Show more monitoring. Space landfill gas monitoring wells no further than 500 feet apart along a perimeter around the waste boundary. Because the landfill contains no excavation beside which wells can be installed,. show wells on the nearest high elevations -ridges, knolls, etc -adjacent to waste placed in valleys and lozv terrain. Show at least one well among the structures next to the landfill. Show wells placed on the review boundary already depicted and utilized on the drawing. If you have any questions, please contact me. RESPONSE: CDM has installed monitoring wells M-10 and M-11. Well locations are provided on the revised Figure 3-1. Current well spacing is approximately 650 feet. Well locations were selected based on the topography and the fact that the drainage features act as preferential PABunmrnbe - 6447\65973 C&D Substantial Amdrnt\Repods\NCDENR Response\PTC Responses\LGMP\Barbee_Response_Leder March 2010.doc Mr. Zinith Barbee March 5, 2010 Page 6 pathways for both groundwater and gas. Arbitrary well placement at 500-foot intervals is not practical for this site. Additional wells are not necessary to the east of the C&D unit, as there are currently wells between the C&D and the Subtitle D landfill that are monitored under the approved Subtitle D plan. Adjacent wells are shown on Figure 3-1. Placement of a monitoring well adjacent to a structure is not an appropriate way to monitor structures. As stated previously, the structures are currently monitored under the approved Plan for the Subtitle D landfill. As such, quarterly monitoring is conducted within the structures themselves. No additional monitoring locations are necessary. The review and compliance boundaries shown on Figure 3-1 are in reference to groundwater and have been removed. According to Rule .0544 (d) (1) (B), the owner or operator of the landfill must ensure that the concentration of methane or other explosive gases does not exceed the lower explosive limit for methane or other explosive gases at the facility property boundary. The existing wells at the C&D landfill are approximately 125-feet from the landfill. The location of these wells will facilitate early detection of landfill gas migration, if present, before it reaches the facility property boundary. Figgres Figure 1 - Revise the detail to convey applicable criteria listed in comment for Section 3.2.1. RESPONSE: Figure 3-2 has been revised to show a well cap with a quick disconnect sampling port, as described in the revised Section 3.3.1. Forms Revise the forms. Form I is entitled "Methane Monitoring Log Form"; Form 2, "Methane Monitoring Data Sheet". Neither form specifies recordation of constituents other than methane; therefore, both should be revised for recording other explosive gases at the landfill. Form 1 Everywhere replace "methane" with "methane or other explosive gases", and, in Item #1, list each well instead of total number of wells. Form 2 Three revisions are necessary. One, in the title, replace "methane" with "methane or other explosive gases". Two, list the wells of a revised landfill gas monitoring plan. Three, expand the table to include measured explosive gases listed in comment for Section 3.3.2. RESPONSE: Both Page 1 and 2 of the Form have been revised to read "Landfill Gas Monitoring Form." References to "methane" on Page 1 have been revised to "landfill gas." PABuncombe - 6447\65973 C&D Substantial Anndnnt\Reports\NCDENR Response\PTC Responses\LGMP\Bwbee_Response_Le"er March 2010.doc Mr. Zinith Barbee March 5, 2010 Page 7 As mentioned, the Page 2 title has been revised to read 'Landfill Gas Monitoring Form." The current revised well list (M-10 and M-11) has been updated accordingly. In addition to %CH4 and % LEL CH4, columns have been added for H2S, %CO2, %02, and %N (as balance gas). Section 4 In the introduction, replace "methane" with "landfill gas RESPONSE: "Methane" has been replaced with "landfill gas" as requested. 4.1 Everywhere in the section, replace "methane" with "landfill gas". RESPONSE: "Methane" has been replaced with "landfill gas" as requested. 4.2 Replace "methane" with "landfill gas." RESPONSE: "Methane' has been replaced with "landfill gas." 4.2.1 Everywhere in the section, replace "methane" with "methane and landfill gas". RESPONSE: "Methane" has been replaced with "landfill gas" throughout the section. 4.2.2 See comment for Section 4.2.1. RESPONSE: "Methane" has been replaced with "landfill gas" throughout the section. 4.3 Include asphyxiation from landfill gases in the "dangerous situation" about which "the public, public service agencies, and the media" will be informed. Also, include the SWS among the notified agencies. RESPONSE: Asphyxiation from landfill gases has been included in the dangerous situation about which public notice will be provided. The SWS has been added to the distribution list. Section 5 In the introduction, replace "methane" with "landfill gas" RESPONSE: Section 5 has been removed. 5.1, 5.11, 5.1.2 Understood is that this option pertains to controlling releases from interior wells. However, the option is already the proposed landfill operation. Interior wells are already "passive venting wells" comprising a "passive removal system" described in the application. Hence, should that system fail, remedial options will begin with addressing features inherent in that design -inadequate pressure in the PABuncombe - 6447\65973 C&D Substantial AmdmlVieportsINCDENR Response\PTC Responses\LGMP\Barbee_Response_Letter _ March 2010.doc Mr. Zinith Barbee March 5, 2010 Page 8 landfill, air intruding the system, untreated atmospheric releases, etc. Also, installing trenches as proposed in the option will necessitate destruction of the landfill cap and may require a permit modification with a fee. That proposal will require review by a SWS environmental engineer. Therefore, options for controlling landfill gas releases should either address failure of the passive removal system presented in the application, or conversion the system to an active gas collection system. Propose an option that accomplishes one of these objectives and relate its effect to landfill gas monitoring. Section 5 was intended to provide options for remediation for landfill gas migration if necessary, and was not intended to serve as Corrective Action Plan. If remediation is required, a Plan with the best alternative will be provided, as described in Rule .0544(d) (3) (C). Section 5 has been removed. We hope that you find that the additional information and revisions provided in this letter sufficient to answer your questions and address your comments. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at (919) 787-5620 or by email at colonemf@cdm.com. Very truly yours, -Nja4l-t- Mathew F. Colon, P.G. Camp Dresser & McKee cc: Ed Mussler, , SWS Mark Poindexter, SWS Allen Gaither, SWS Asheville Regional Office Andrea Keller, SWS Asheville Regional Office Jerry Mears, Buncombe County Kristy Smith, Buncombe County Kenton Yang, CDM File 5 MWW-" 201° P:tBunmmbe - 6447185973 G&D Substantial AmAmt\Reports\NCDENR Response%P7C Responses\LGMMBarbee_Response_Letter March 2010.Uoc Attachment Landfill Gas Monitoring Plan Contents Landfill Gas Monitoring Plan - C&D Landfill Section 1 Introduction 1.1 Purpose.......................................................................................................................1-1 1.2 General Characteristics of LFG and Methane Generation..................................1-1 Section 2 Regulatory Background 2.1 C&D Landfills and North Carolina Regulations..................................................2-1 Section 3 Gas Control Plan 3.1 Frequency of Routine Monitoring..........................................................................3-1 3.2 Monitoring Procedures............................................................................................3-1 3.2.1 Monitoring Well Installation and Construction....................................3-1 3.2.2 LFG Monitoring.........................................................................................3-2 3.3 Record Keeping.........................................................................................................3-2 Section 4 Detection Plan 4.1 Actions If Regulatory Limits Detected at Monitoring Wells..............................4-1 4.2 C&D Compliance Action Plan................................................................................4-1 4.2.1 Immediate Action......................................................................................4-1 4.2.2 Actions Within Seven Days......................................................................4-2 4.2.3 Actions Within Sixty Days........................................................................4-2 4.3 Public Relations and Information...........................................................................4-2 Figures Figure 3-1 Figure 3-2 Landfill Gas Monitoring Well Locations................................................3-3 Typical Landfill Gas Monitoring Well Construction Diagram ...........3-4 B P1Buncombs • 644A65973 C&D Substantial Amdmt\Reports\NCDENR Response\PTC Responses\LGMP\Revised LFG Monitoring Plan_TOC_March 2010.doc Section 1 Introduction Landfill gas (LFG) is a natural by-product of the anaerobic decomposition of landfilled bio-degradable waste. Under aerobic conditions, LFG can ignite and propagate fires, presenting a danger to human health and the environment and therefore must be monitored. For these reasons, LFG is regulated by Federal and North Carolina state legislation. This Plan describes the systems and programs needed to fulfill federal and state regulations concerning LFG. Methane and hydrogen sulfide are two gases that could potentially be generated from wastes in a C&D landfill. Since this plan is for the C&D landfill, it is noted that LFG, particularly methane, generation is expected to be minimal based on the lack of organic matter in the waste stream. Also, the amount of drywall in the Buncombe County waste stream that could potentially generate hydrogen sulfide is minimal. This Plan is intended for the C&D Landfill only. An explosive gas control plan is already in -place for the Subtitle D Landfill. The Plan for the C&D Landfill includes LFG monitoring at or near the facility boundary through monitoring wells. All structures at the Site are monitored under the plan already in place for the Subtitle D landfill. 1.1 Purpose This Plan fulfills the requirements set forth in Rule .0544(d) for monitoring LFG. This Plan: • is intended for the C&D Landfill only, • describes the necessary LFG monitoring systems, • sets forth the monitoring procedures and programs, and • identifies the actions needed if levels of methane or hydrogen sulfide exceed regulatory limits. 1.2 General Characteristics of LFG and Methane Generation LFG is composed of approximately 50 percent methane in contrast to natural gas which consists of approximately 95 percent methane. What makes LFG a source of environmental pollution is its odor, its potentially explosive properties, its potential for asphyxiation, and its contribution to global warming. LFG programs which focus on the environmental hazards of landfill gas include systems to monitor the migration of gas and control or neutralize its environmental impacts. Landfill gas from MSW landfills is typically composed of 50 to 55 percent methane, 45 to 50 percent carbon dioxide, and less than one percent non -methane organic compounds. These individual gases remain co -mingled and do not naturally separate. 1-1 PAEluncombe - 6447\65973 C&D Substantial Amdnnt\ReportsXNCDENR Response\PTC Responses\LGMP\Revised LFG Monitoring Plan_March 2010.doc (Revised March 2010) Section 1 Introduction Because C&D wastes do not contain large quantities of organic matter, methane and carbon dioxide should not be a concern. However, if a significant amount of gypsum wallboard is present in C&D waste, hydrogen sulfide may potentially be produced, particularly if moisture is introduced into the waste. 1-2 PABuncombe- 644A65973 C&D Substantial Amdmt\ReportsWCDENR Response\PTC Responses\LGMP\Revised LFG Monitoring Plan_March 2010.doc (Revised March 2010) Section 2 Regulatory Background Because of the real and potential dangers from LFG, particularly hydrogen sulfide or to a lesser extent methane in LFG generated from C&D landfills, to the public health and safety and to the environment, existing state regulations, as described in Rule 15A NCAC 13B .0544 (d) (1 through 5), require owners of C&D landfills to monitor and, if necessary, control it. 2.1 C&D Landfills and North Carolina Regulations Methane gas is explosive when present within the range of 5 to 15 percent by volume in air. When present in concentrations greater than 15 percent, the mixture will not explode. The 5 percentage mixture is referred to as the Lower Explosive Limit (LEL) while the 15 percentage concentration is referred to as the Upper Explosive Limit (UEL). Hydrogen sulfide is explosive when present within the range of 4 to 44 percent by volume in air. In addition, hydrogen sulfide can be immediately dangerous to life and health at concentrations of 100 parts per million. The State of North Carolina, through its 15A NCAC 13B .0544(d)(1), requires owners or operators of all C&D landfills to ensure that the facility: A) Does not exceed 25 percent of the LEL for methane or other explosive gases in facility structures; B) Does not exceed the LEL for methane or other explosive gases at the facility property boundary; and C) Does not release methane gas or other explosive gases in any concentration that can be detected in offsite structures. The LEL means the lowest percent by volume of a mixture of explosive gases in air that will propagate a flame at 25 C and atmospheric pressure per Rule .0544(d)(5). Rule .0544(d)(2) requires that a routine methane monitoring program be implemented to ensure that these standards are met. The type of monitoring will be determined based on soil conditions, hydrogeologic conditions under and surrounding the facility, hydraulic conditions on and surrounding the facility, the location of facility structures and property boundaries, and the location of all off -site structures adjacent to property boundaries. Additionally, frequency of monitoring shall be quarterly. Rule .0544(d)(3) requires that if methane or explosive gas levels exceed the specified limits, the owner or operator must: A) Immediately take all necessary steps to ensure the protection of human health and notify the Division; 2-1 PABuncombe - 644A65973 C&D Substantial Amdml\ReporlsWCDENR Response\PTC Responses\LGMRRevised LFG Monitoring Plan_March 2010.doc (Revised March 2010) Section 2 Regulatory Background B) Within seven days of detection, place in the operating record the methane or explosive gas levels detected and a description of the steps taken to protect human health; C) Within 60 days of detection, implement a remediation plan for the methane or explosive gas releases, place a copy of the plan in the operating record, and notify the Division that the plan has been implemented. The plan must describe the nature and extend of the problem and the proposed remedy. As described in Rule 15A NCAC 13B .0554 (f), this Landfill Gas Monitoring Plan is part of the Monitoring Plan for the C&D facility. In addition to the Landfill Gas Monitoring Plan, the Facility Monitoring Plan includes the Water Quality Monitoring Plan. 2-2 PA13uncombe- 644AS5973 C&D Substantial Amdnnt\Reports\NCDENR Response\PTC Responses\LGMP1Revised LFG Monitoring Plan_March 2010.doc (Revised January 2010) Section 3 Gas Control Plan The gas control plan includes a schedule for reading or monitoring LFG emission levels at designated locations quarterly and a system for reporting the concentration levels. The requirements for quarterly monitoring, and the plan for actions if readings exceed safe levels should, at a minimum, be based on compliance with federal and state regulations. 3.1 Frequency of Routine Monitoring Rule .0544(d)(1) and (2) states that a quarterly methane monitoring program be implemented to ensure that the concentration of methane or other explosive gases do not exceed regulatory limits. 3.2 Monitoring Procedures Each quarterly monitoring procedure shall begin by verifying that the instrument has been calibrated. The instrument shall be calibrated per the manufacturer's instruction. Monitoring shall be completed with a GEM-2000 or equivalent in conjunction with an Industrial Scientific M-40 4-gas meter or equivalent. Monitoring wells around the C&D landfill shall be checked. Currently there are two landfill gas monitoring wells at the C&D landfill (M-10 and M-11). Well locations for the C&D landfill are provided on Figure 3-1. 3.2.1 Monitoring Well Installation and Construction Wells M-10 and M-11 will be used to monitor the C&D landfill for LFG migration. The landfill gas monitoring wells are constructed with 2-inch diameter schedule 40 PVC with threaded couplings with a minimum of 10 feet of 0.010-inch slotted screen with a #2 sand filter pack extending 1 foot above the top of the screen. A 1 to 2-foot thick bentonite seal was placed on top of the sand filter pack and hydrated. The remainder of the borehole annulus was completed with a Portland cement/bentonite grout. Screen length was selected based on groundwater and bedrock elevations observed during well installation. Similar to the groundwater monitoring wells at the C&D facility, the landfill gas monitoring wells were installed within the dominant drainage features associated with each Phase of C&D landfill development. Well locations are in or adjacent to low-lying drainage feature areas down -gradient of the landfill unit where seasonal high groundwater elevations 'are typically within the partially weathered rock or alluvium. The Buncombe County C&D landfill is being constructed such that there is little to no excavation and the bottom of waste will be at or near existing grade. As such, well screens in some cases are 50-feet or more below the base of the C&D landfill. CDM believes that in the case of the Buncombe County C&D landfill, it is unreasonable to install landfill gas monitoring wells into the fractured bedrock. If 3-1 P1Buncombe - 644T65973 C&D Substantial Amdmt\Reports\NCDENR Response\PTC Responses\LGMP\Revised LFG Monitoring Plan_March 2010.doc (Revised March 2010) Section 3 Gas Control Plan groundwater data in fractured bedrock or other indicators such as distressed vegetation indicate that a landfill gas migration problem may exist, additional deeper monitoring wells may be installed to assess gas migration. All landfill gas monitoring wells were constructed in accordance with the North Carolina Well Construction Standards described in 15A NCAC 2C and were completed with locking above grade protective covers and 2-foot by 2-foot concrete pads. Following installation, the wells will be surveyed to State Plane coordinates. The wellhead caps will be fitted with a stopcock type fitting that is of sufficient quality to facilitate sampling in accordance with industry and federal standards. Figure 3-2 includes a typical landfill gas monitoring well detail. Flooded wells will be replaced with dry wells, if necessary. 3.2.2 LFG Monitoring An initial landfill gas reading for % methane, % lower explosive limits for methane, % carbon dioxide, and % oxygen was collected from each of the newly installed landfill gas monitoring wells with a GEM-2000 landfill gas monitoring meter or similar 24- hours after installation. Following the initial reading, readings will be collected from each well on a quarterly basis. A GEM-2000 landfill gas meter or equivalent and an Industrial Scientific M-40 4-gas meter or equivalent will be used to monitor landfill gas in the wells. The 4-gas meter will be attached to the exhaust port of the GEM-2000. The GEM-2000 will detect CH4, CO2, 02, and the 4-gas meter will detect CH4 LEL, H2S (ppm), CO (ppm), and % 02. If landfill gas levels detected at the monitoring wells exceeds the LEL, the technician shall immediately follow the action plan presented in Section 4.1. Given the historical groundwater data at the C&D site, it is not anticipated that well flooding will be an issue. If, however, it is determined that a well is flooded above the well screen elevation, that well will not be sampled and a new dry well will be installed in its place. 3.3 Record Keeping All readings will be recorded on a standard landfill gas monitoring log form. A sample landfill gas monitoring log is provided at the end of this section. This form or similar will be used. These forms will be reviewed by the landfill supervisor or the County's environmental consultant and placed on file at the landfill with other landfill records. These readings should be available for review by the State upon request. 3-2 PABuncombe - 644A65973 C&D Substantial Amdmt\Reports\WDENR Response\PTC Responses\LGMP\Revised LFG Monitoring Plan_March 2010.doc (Revised March 2010) 0 1 " = 200' 100 0 200 N \\\ N 739 ID 0 177 --- - o , 1870 N �`/l,i 190 ; /� / O, i ,0b� • 0� i i O, �'�IiO b• ! q0 i' 11 LEGEND: MW-2 EXISTING MONITOR - SW-3 SURFACE WATER #F MW-15/15D PROPOSED GROU Q SW-6 PROPOSED SURFA ■ M-10 APPROXIMATE LA C REV. NQ DAR MMN OIND RFYMRKS VITORIt3 G WELL— 0 I 0 Landfill Gas Monitoring Plan Buncombe County C&D Landfill "Steel, Locking Protective Cover Finished Grade I I I I I Wellhead cap with quick disconnect sampling port 2'x2'x6" Concrete Pad Type I Cement Grout 2' Bentonite Seal ­4,41 4 6161 2" Schedule 40 PVC Blank Casing 8" +/- Borehole Diameter Silica Sand Filter Pack 2" Schedule 40 PVC 0.010 inch Slotted Well Screen Threaded, PVC End -Cap Notes: Stick-up will extend between 2.5 and 3 feet above finished grade. All PVC well material will be threaded joint. Silica sand filter pack will extend at least 2 feet above top of screen elevation. Anticipated screen length will vary depending on depth to groundwater or bedrock. cm Figure 3-2 Typical Landfill Gas Monitoring Well Construction Diagram Section 3 Gas Control Plan LANDFILL GAS MONITORING LOG FORM (this report must be completed quarterly) Buncombe County C&D Landfill Buncombe County, North Carolina Technician Name: Date: (mo/day/year) General weather conditions: Temperature: Barometric condition pressure: MONITORING INSTRUCTIONS 1. Measure landfill gas levels at C&D landfill gas monitoring wells M-10 and M-11 located around the C&D landfill. The landfill gas reading must not exceed 100% of the methane L.E.L. If landfill gas measurements exceed 100% of the L.E.L., contact the landfill supervisor and follow the outlined plan in Appendix B of the operations manual. 2. If landfill gas levels exceed the above -mentioned levels at any monitoring location, report the measurements to the County for further action as described in the Gas Control Plan — C&D Landfill. 3. File this landfill gas monitoring log sheet in the landfill office in the appropriate record keeping section with other landfill records. ai r 3-5 PABuncombe - 644A65973 C&D Substantial Amdmt\ReportsWCDENR Response\PTC Responses\LGMRRevised LFG Monitoring Plan_March 2010.doc (Revised March 201u) P u L I _ � < c 0 z E O E z O 2 } � � :CP co � 0,11 « § CU . : � \� Co ki�o . � � -Au � 31 . . : � ) § k R \ § . � � t ) < �� / a)� E G /\E 7 j Section 4 Detection Plan The North Carolina Solid Waste Management Rules, .0544(d)(3), require a detection plan for action if landfill gas levels exceed the regulatory concentration limits. The plan for action includes the specific step by step actions needed should regulatory limits be detected. 4.1 Actions if Regulatory Limits Detected at Monitoring Wells If any of the landfill gas monitoring wells measure a level equal to or more than the LEL as defined by in the Rules, the technician should: • immediately contact the landfill supervisor; and • recheck the landfill gas levels at each well. The equipment used to take the readings should be tested to verify it is giving accurate readings. This information, the current readings, and the levels for the previous three quarters should be provided to the Buncombe County landfill supervisor who will make the decision to: return to business as usual; temporarily evacuate the site; or, follow the plan proposed in Section 4.2. 4.2 C&D Compliance Action Plan If upon verification as described in Sections 4.1, the landfill gas monitoring levels are equal to or exceed the regulatory limits as defined by state and federal regulations, the following actions are proposed to comply with state regulations as well as protect the health and safety of the individuals at or near the C&D landfill. 4.2.1 Immediate Action If landfill gas levels exceed the specified limits, the landfill operator or the landfill supervisor will take immediate action to ensure the protection of human health and safety. This will include: • monitor all structures at the facility; • if landfill gas levels are detected in the onsite structures, open all doors and windows in buildings on the landfill site; • if warranted by the degree of intensity of the landfill gas concentration in the onsite structures, evacuate all buildings on the site; • notify the Buncombe County Manager Office's about the concentration levels; 4-1 PABuncombe. 644A65973 C&D Substantial AmdrnAReports\NCDENR Response\PTC Responses\LGMPtRevised LFG Monitoring Plan —March 201 O.doc (Revised March 2010) Section 4 Detection Plan • if warranted by the degree of intensity of the landfill gas concentration in the wells, check the landfill gas levels in structures on adjacent properties to the facility boundary; • if warranted by the degree of intensity of the landfill gas concentration, evacuate the landfill area or evacuate the area adjacent to the landfill; • notify the Division about the reading; • begin to identify or narrow down the source of the landfill gas causing the readings exceeding the regulatory limits (i.e. the path that the landfill gas is taking to the monitoring location); • begin to identify the extent of the landfill gas problem; and • as appropriate, begin to take corrective action to control the landfill gas levels in building at the landfill site, at the boundaries to the landfill, and at the landfill site. 4.2.2 Actions Within Seven Days If landfill gas levels exceed the regulatory limits, the County must, within seven days, place in the operating record the gas levels detected and a description of the steps taken to protect human health. It is also suggested that at this time, the operator begin to develop a plan which: • describes the nature and extent of the problem and • proposes a remedy for the problem. 4.2.3 Actions Within Sixty Days If methane levels exceed the specified limits, the County will take the following actions within 60 days: • implement a remediation plan for the landfill gas release; • place a copy of the plan in the operating record of the landfill; and • notify the Division that the plan has been implemented. 4.3 Public Relations and Information As with any potentially dangerous situation, including asphyxiation from landfill gases, it is important to keep the public, public service agencies, regulatory agencies, and the media informed. False information, inaccurate information, or the lack of information concerning potential explosions at a public facility could create panic. 4-2 P1Buncombe - 6447\65973 C&D Substantial Amdmt\Reports\NCDENR Response\PTC Responses\LGMRRevised LFG Monitoring Plan_March 2010.doc (Revised March 2010) Section 4 Detection Plan If it is determined that a potentially dangerous situation exists, it is recommended that a one page explanation of the situation be written and distributed to all homes and businesses within a one-half mile radius of the landfill. This should be done within the first two to four hours of making the determination that a potential danger to human health and safety exists. It is recommended that the County Manager appoint one individual to provide information to: the appropriate regulatory agency; the media; the police authorities with jurisdiction in the area; and area medical facilities. Area hospitals and police departments may receive calls once the local media releases the story. Centralizing the flow of information will avoid conflicting information and inaccurate information. Providing detailed and honest facts about the situation being under control is critical. 4-3 PABuncombe - 644A65973 C&D Substantial Amdmt\ReportsXNCDENR Response\PTC Responses\LGMP\Revised LFG Monitoring Plan_March 2010.doc (Revised March 2010) Q. Q. n. CL O O O O 0 ai o 0 a�i 0 v 0 Oco N N N N co N j 00 O O O O 0 co (n oo Z Z Z Z di rn N (n O N c c O_ O U E a) cu J W; O O O O J d 00 i" Ql 00 m o 0 0 0 0 00 00 00 00 m N \ tO r-I c—i �r—I m CJ w N U\ 0 0 0 0 m a Vo 0 0 0 0 E u- m ° F z z z z z U N L d U r N (p c-i N lh 't to l0 M vn m N N � 2 2i m m �2Z>2222� ink Landfill Gas Measurements Field Worksheet Francis Farm Landfill - Permit #44-03 Haywood County, North Carolina Name of Person Taking Readings: Jeff Bishop Weather Conditions: Sunny, Atmospheric Pressure., 27.08" Gas Monitoring Equipment: Land -Tee GEM 2000 Factory Calibration Date: September 2009 Date: October 1, 2010 Ambient Temp: 64 Serial #: GM05480 Field Calibration Date: September 30, 2010 •[GiIflF - i�a[{.11.�i 3� fi" me ' Y /OL � Jt .� `NJ � a,45' ,'-'i , �. ;} 1 MM-1 Stable Not Installed MM-2 Stable Not Installed MM-3 Stable 14.40 4.0 0.2 0.0 21.0 Replace 1" PVC Ca MM-4 Stable 14:29 >100 1 63.6 28.5 0.7 MM-5 Stable 14:25 0.0 0.0 4.5 16.2 MM-6 Stable 14:20 620.0 31.0 24.3 0.7 MM-7 Stable 14:15 2.0 0.1 3.8 17.0 MM-8 Stable 15:15 0.0 0.0 1.8 18.6 need quick connect MM-9 Stable 13:34 0.0 0.0 3.2 17.9 MM-10 MM-11 Stable 13:26 1118.0 55.9 38.2 0.7 need quick connect Stable 13:10 946.0 47.3 35.4 1 0.8 need quick connect MM-12 Stable 12:55 1212.0 60.6 38.9 0.6 need quick connect MM-13 Stable 12:50 0.0 0.0 15.1 4.6 need quick connect SM-1a Stable 14:12 0.0 0.0 0.0 21.1 Need plastic sign SM-1b Stable 14:09 0.0 0.0 0.0 21.2 Need plastic sign SM-1c Stable 14.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 21.0 Need Plastic sign SM-2 Stable 13:65 0.0 0.0 0.0 21.1 Need plastic si n SM-3 Stable 13:60 0.0 0.0 0.0 21.2 Need plastic sign SM-4� Stable 15:40 0.0 0.0 0.0 20.9 Sam led underdrain at house. VI3-1* Stable 15:03 190.0 9.5 3.4 17.9 MW-4* Stable 13:45 24.0 1.2 0.7 20.6 MW-5* Stable 13.38 0.0 0.0 0.0 21.0 Notes: 1. If methane gas readings exceed 25% of LEL in structures or 100% of LEL in probes, contact Haywood County Solid Waste Director immediately. 2. *To be monitored from 11/16/10 to 11/15/11. May be dropped from monitoring after assessment period is complete. Field Observation Notes: Landfill Gas Measurements Field Worksheet Francis Farm Landfill - Permit #44-03 Haywood County, North Carolina Name of Person Taking Readings: Jeff Bishop Date: October 1.2010 Weather Conditions: Sunny Ambient Temp: 64 Atmospheric Pressure: 27.08" Gas Monitoring Equipment: land -Tee GEM 2000 Serial #: GM06480 Factory Calibration Date: September 2009 Field Calibration Date : September 30, 2010 I J9V Tian 3 ¢� r p/O�GI�i.i � i�=r2�r �'- a3-may...-. 3"'=' } .Pig'S7in s r MM-1 Stable Not Installed MM-2 Stable Not Installed MM-3 Stable 14:40 4.0 0.2 0.0 21.0 Replace V PVC Ca MM-4 Stable 14:29 >100 63.6 28.5 0.7 MM-5 Stable 14:25 0.0 0.0 4.5 16.2 MM-6 Stable 14:20 620.0 31.0 24.3 0.7 MM-7 Stable 14:15 2.0 0.1 3.8 17.0 MM-8 Stable 15:15 0.0 0.0 1.8 18.6 need quick connect MM-9 Stable 13:34 0.0 0.0 3.2 17.9 MM-10 MM-11 Stable 13:26 1118.0 55.9 38.2 0.7 need quick connect Stable 13:10 946.0 47.3 35.4 0.8 need quick connect MM-12 Stable 12:56 1212.0 60.6 38.9 0.6 need quick connect MM-13 Stable 12:60 0.0 0.0 15.1 4.6 need quick connect SM-1a Stable 14:12 0.0 0.0 0.0 21.1 Need plastic sign SM-lb Stable 14:09 0.0 0.0 0.0 21.2 Need plastic sign SM-1c Stable 14.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 21.0 Need plastic sign SM-2 Stable 13:55 0.0 0.0 0.0 1 21.1 Need plastic sign SM-3 Stable 13:50 0.0 0.0 0.0 21.2 Need plastic sign SM-4* Stable 15:40 0.0 0.0 0.0 20.9 Sampled underdrain at house. VB-1 * Stable 16:03 190.0 9.5 3.4 17.9 MW-4* Stable 13:45 24.0 1.2 0.7 20.6 MW-5* Stable 13:38 0.0 0.0 0.0 21.0 Notes: 1. If methane gas readings exceed 25% of LEL in structures or 100% of LEL in probes, contact Haywood County Solid Waste Director immediately. 2. *To be monitored from 11/16/10 to 11/15/11. Maybe dropped from monitoring after assessment period is complete. Field Observation Notes: Landfill Gas Measurements Field Worksheet White Oak MSW Landfill Haywood County, North Carolina Name of Person Taking Readings: J Bishop/ D Pasko Date: Decmebr 29, 2010 Weather Conditions: Overcast Ambient Temp: 360 Atmospheric Pressure: 27.42" Gas Monitoring Equipment: Land-Tec GEM 2000 Serial #: GM11944109 Factory Calibration Date: August 27, 2010 Field Calibration Date: December 29, 2010 y 5� ti � r LFG-1 Yes 13:22 0.0 0.0 6.0 15.4 LFG-2 Yes 13:30 0.0 0.0 2.6 19.4 LFG-4r Yes 13:39 0.0 0.0 0.3 20.4 LFG-7 Yes 13:42 0.0 0.0 2.8 19.4 LFG-8 Yes 13:53 0.0 0.0 0.9 20.2 LFG-9 Yes 14:15 0.0 .0.0 0.1 20.6 LFG-10 Yes 14:07 0.0 &0 1.5 19.5 Need to add quick coupler Maint Bldg Yes 14:34 0.0 0.0 0.1 20.6 need plastic sign Scale House Yes 14:29 0.0 0.0 0.1 20.6 need plastic sign Note: If methane gas readings exceed 25% of LEL in structures or 100% of LEL in probes contact Haywood County Solid Waste Director immediatley Field Observation Notes: l Landfill Gas Measurements Field Worksheet White Oak MSW Landfill Haywood County, North Carolina Name of Person Taking Readings: Jeff Bishop Date: September 30, 2010 Weather Conditions: Overcast Ambient Temp: - Deg• Atmospheric Pressure: IM Gas Monitoring Equipment: Land-Tec GEM 2000 Serial #: GM06480 Factory Calibration Date: September 2009 Field Calibration Date: September 30.2010 LFG-1 Yes 10:55 2.0 LFG-2 Yes 10:50 0.0 LFG-4r Yes 10:40 2.0 LFG-7 Yes 10:45 0.0 LFG-8 Yes 10:36 2.0 LFG-9 Yes 10:25 2.0 LFG-10 Yes 10:15 2.0 Maint Bldg Yes 11:00 0.0 Scale House Yes 11:05 0.0 Note: If methane gas readings exceed 25% of LEL in structures or 100% of LEL in probes contact Haywood County Solid Waste Director immediatley Field Observation Notes: Landfill Gas Measurements Field Worksheet White Oak MSW Landfill Haywood County, North Carolina Name of Person Taking Readings: J Bishop/ D Pasko Date: Decmebr 29. 2010 Weather Conditions: Overcast Ambient Temp: 360 Atmospheric Pressure: 27.42" Gas Monitoring Equipment: Land-Tec GEM 2000 Serial #: GM11944109 Factory Calibration Date: August 27, 2010 Field Calibration Date: December 29, 2010 '-r;x�r LFG-1 Yes 13:22 0.0 0.0 6.0 15.4 LFG-2 Yes 13:30 0.0 0.0 2.6 19.4 LFG-4r Yes 13:39 0.0 0.0 0.3 20.4 LFG-7 Yes 13:42 0.0 0.0 2.8 19 A LFG-8 Yes 13:53 0.0 0.0 0.9 20.2 LFG-9 Yes 14:15 0.0 .0.0 0.1 20.6 LFG-10 Yes 14:07 0.0 0.0 1.5 19.5 Need to add quick coupler Maint Bldg Yes 14:34 0.0 0.0 0.1 20.6 need plastic sin ` Scale House Yes 14:29 0.0 0.0 0.1 20.6 need plastic sign Note: If methane gas readings exceed 25% of LEL in structures or 100% of LEL in probes contact Haywood County Solid Waste Director immediatley Field Observation Notes: ,-Landfill Gas Measurements Field Worksheet Francis Farm Landfill - Permit #44-03 Hayuv®od County, North Carolina Name of Person Taking Readings: J Bishop/ D Pasko Weather Conditions: Clear/ 8" snow Atmospheric Pressure: 27.20" Gas Monitoring Equipment: Land-Tec GEM 2000 Factory Calibration Date: August 27, 2010 Date: November 22, 2010 Ambient Temp; 28° Serial #: GM11944109 Field Calibration Date: December 29, 2010 .. �._y �,.%-, • i�Q��}^rlE"� p R. Fes, x�-.:- '� ar ; �� a�}n/j.� ,_ ::bst�,5- s t,���� 5� ���.T'-�z .e,'� yy �,Z ���1- � .-t ''j�-}y� �,f,-c.Y� raa a�% �� ��� ,�ja4'� d "`'4 �1�6J.fi,�a.:�'i1.1r Q�l� 0 �� � � 'c � J `ti ate' tl-. 'v1�•..M'H Z •.::- �. .r�x�-,�M ,� ==` lir,,�••.� ' . n'�-a, �-r. � - ' `�'r�.�-r '.. �tir.,K .�,..`�� MM-1 Stable 12:00 596.0 29.8 24.3 0.6 Need to replace lock/ label MM-2 Stable 11:54 1012.0 50.6 35.1 0.1 Need to replace lock/ label MM-3 Stable 11:49 876.0 43.8 33.0 0.4 MM-4 Stable 11:44 442.0 22.1 24.2 2.7 MM-5 Stable 11:41 0.0 0.0 5.5 18.0 MM-6 Stable 11:37 198.0 9.9 14.9 5.7 MM-7 Stable 11:33 0.0 0.0 2.7 18.8 MM 8 Stable 11:23 0.0 0.0 . 2.7 19.2 need lock MM-9 Stable 12:43 0.0 0.0 2.8 18.3 MM-10 Stable - - - - covered w1 snow, could not sample MM-11 Stable 10:31 1030.0 51.5 34.1 0.2 MM-12 Stable 10:24 1216.0 60.8 38.9 0.2 MM-13 I Stable - - - - covered w/ snow, could not sample SM-1a Stable 11:25 0.0 0.0 0.2 21.2 Need plastic sign SM-lb Stable 11:27 0.0 0.0 0.2 21,2 Need plastic sign SM-1c Stable 11:29 0.0 0.0 0.1 21.2 Need plastic sign SM-2 Stable 11:21 2.0 0.1 0.2 21.1 Need plastic sign SM-3 Stable - - - - could not access building MW-12 Stable 10:57 0.0 0.0 0.2 21.0 Could not access SM-4 VB-1* Stable - - - - could not access due to snow MW-4* Stable 11:15 220.0 11.0 10.0 15.0 MW-5* Stable 12:"1 0.0 0.0 0.8 20.9 Notes: 1. If methane gas readings exceed 25% of LEL in structures or 100% of LEL in probes, contact Haywood County Solid Waste Director immediately. 2. *To be monitored from 11/15/10 to 11115/11. Maybe dropped from monitoring after assessment period is complete. Field Observation Notes: RIE'CEIVED • C A S S O C I A T E S June 3, 2010 Ms. Andrea Keller Environmental Senior Specialist Solid Waste Section Division of Waste Management North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources 2090 U.S. Highway 70 Swannanoa, North Carolina 28778 Dear Ms. Keller: J U N B 2010 SOLID WASTE SECTION ASHEVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE RE: Facility Compliance Audit Report White Oak Municipal Solid Waste Landfill Permit # 44-07 Haywood County, North Carolina On behalf of Haywood County, North Carolina, we are providing this response to the Facility Compliance Audit Report received May 12, 2010. Based on McGill Associates review of the specific site conditions, we have prepared this response to generally correspond with the indentified Noted Violations and Areas of Concern. Noted Violations 15A NCAC 13B .1626 (1)(g)(ii) for waste placement outside of the base liner system and 15A NCAC 13B .1626 (8)(d) failure to contain leachate on -site, within the base liner system, that was not properly treated prior to discharge. As part of the construction of the new Phase 3 waste area, the existing Phase 1 and Phase 2 liner edges had to be exposed to allow connection of the Phase 3 liner system. During the construction, it was discovered that waste was beyond the existing liner limits and, in addition, it appeared that leachate had been discharged outside the liner limits. Upon discovery, the County immediately reported the situation to the Solid Waste Section on August 6, 2009. The Audit Report accurately documents the timeline of events. The County took the following remediation steps to remedy the above violation: 1. Immediately contracted with Thalle Construction to remove the waste from outside liner limit to an area near the working face. Additional waste material was removed to allow an adequate area for the control of leachate. The waste material was removed by August 25, 2009. Approximately 6,350 cubic yards of waste material was relocated. E n g i n e e r i n g P l a n n i n g e F i n a n c e McGill Associates, P.A. • P.O. Box 2259, Asheville, NC 28802 55 Broad Street, Asheville, NC 1,Y801 828-252-0575 • Fax: 828-252-2518 Ms. Andrea Keller June 3, 2010 Page 2 2. Haywood County contacted Ervin Lane on August 10, 2010 to discuss suitable mitigation measures for the contaminated soil and an action plan was approved. To determine the extent of leachate contamination, soil testing was completed on soils in the area where waste and leachate were found on outside of liner edge. Soil material was removed until a clean soil sample was obtained. Approximately 2,500 cubic yards of soil material was removed and placed into the permitted waste area. Soil samples of the affected area were obtained on October 7 (Area 1) and October 26 (Area 2), 2009 and results were submitted to the North Carolina Department of Natural Resources (NCDENR), Solid Waste Section. On November 9, 2009, approval was given by the Solid Waste Section to resume Phase 3 construction. 3. In order to control leachate from leaving the existing liner limits, the County instituted the following additional operational measures: • Established temporary sumps within the existing liner limits to provide points to pump out excess leachate. • Utilized existing landfill gas vents as leachate sumps to remove leachate from the lined waste area. • Utilized diesel pump, purchased 2 electric pumps and rented a portable generator to supplement existing leachate system. • Rented three "frac" (storage) tanks to increase leachate storage capacity during Phase 3 construction. • Pumped out and hauled off -site more than 5.6 million gallons of leachate to an approved wastewater treatment facility from August 2009 through April 2010 (previous highest yearly total was 3.8 million gallons for a 12- month period in 2004/2005). 4. Through the Phase 3 construction contract, established a permanent leachate sump and pump station within the Phase 1 waste area to assist existing leachate collection system. 5. Established new operational and training procedures with landfill staff to prevent waste being placed beyond the liner limits. • All existing liner limits have been identified and liner edge markers will be installed by June 30, 2010. • Concrete liner edge markers have been installed around new Phase 3 waste area. • Additional training with landfill operators will be held during the month June 2010 to show where the liner limits are and stress the importance of proper setbacks of waste placement. A copy of the training record will be included in the Operational Record. Ms. Andrea Keller June 3, 2010 Page 3 I5A NCAC 13B .1626 (2)(c) for failure to replace the minimum of one foot of cover intermediate soil cover over all exposed waste in Area I and Area 2. As described above, waste was relocated from the Areas 1 and 2, as depicted in the Audit Report, for the construction of the new Phase 3 waste area. During the waste removal, a portion of the area was not re-covered with the required soil cover. Haywood County has now covered a majority all of the area with soil cover with the exception of the area noted as Area 2 (along the northern limits of Phase 2), as shown on the attached photos. In area along the Phase 2 limits, a proper soil cover can not be established at this time due to the existing steep slope and inaccessibility to the location by construction equipment. As noted above, waste had to be relocated to construct the Phase 3 waste area tie-in to the Phase 2 liner. Due to the existing condition of the Phase 2 waste fill, it was not feasible to relocate enough waste to establish a slope suitable for placement of soil cover material. Based on the current condition, the County proposes to cover the exposed waste along the northern slope of Phase 2 with a plastic tarp. The plastic tarp will remain in -place until such time as the Phase 3 area is permitted to receive waste and access can be established through Phase 3 to the uncovered waste along Phase 2. Once access is established a proper soil cover can be placed. The Phase 2 soil cover will be established with 60 days of issuance of the Permit to Operate for Phase 3. I5A NCAC 13B .0203 (d) states that: by receiving solid waste at a permitted facility, the permittee(s) shall be considered to have accepted the conditions of the permit and shall comply with the conditions of the permit. As part of the Permit to Construct MSW Phase 3 and 4, several groundwater monitoring wells (MW's) and landfill gas monitoring wells (LFG's) were abandoned in order to construct MSW Phase 3 and its associated grading for access roads and soil stockpiles. New MW's and LFG's were shown on the Permit to Construct drawings and approved by the Permitting Section of the Solid Waste Section. An "Explosive Gas Control Plan" was included in Appendix 3 of the approved Operations Plan. Haywood County will construct the approved MW's and LFG's as shown on the Permit to Construct drawings and in accordance with the approved plans. The County will provide an updated as -built map which shows the location of the MW's and LFG's. The County is in the process of working with Bunnell-Lammons Engineering, Inc. (BLE) to finalize the contract for the installation of the proposed MW's and LFG's, as shown in the Permit to Construct. In addition to these proposed wells, the County must replace three MW's (MW 3, MW 31), and MW 9) and LFG 4, which were inadvertently covered by filling operations during the construction of MSW Phase 3. Zinith Barbee, the reviewing NCDENR Hydrogeologist for this project, was notified on April 30, 2010 of the fact that the wells were covered with fill dirt during construction. A subsequent email to Mr. Barbee pertaining to MW 9 was sent June 3, 2010. Mr. Barbee responded with a letter, dated May 5, 2010, which outlined the steps necessary to remedy the situation. To summarize, MW's 3, 31), 9 and LFG 4 will be replaced in close proximity to their original location, and shall be renumbered MW 3r, MW 3Dr, MW 9r, and LFG 4r. Mr. Barbee had additional concerns regarding surface water monitoring point SW-2 and MW 4A. The original location of SW-2 was in the area permitted to be filled by Ms. Andrea Keller June 3, 2010 Page 5 Like most County -operated solid waste disposal facilities, Haywood County is facing funding challenges. The County is restructuring personnel assignments in their Solid Waste Department to accommodate additional positions at the White Oak Landfill. The County continuously seeks applicants for positions at the landfill. The County will continue to provide the necessary resources to ensure that the White Oak Landfill is properly operated and maintained. The construction of MSW Phase 3 was a challenge to all involved. The discovery of waste outside the liner limits of existing MSW Phase 1 and very close to the liner limits of MSW Phase 2 presented difficulties to the Contractor in connecting to the existing liner edge and to the County in keeping wastes covered and leachate under control. In addition, the extreme amount of rainfall during the construction period and the rock encountered within the Phase 3 limits added to the complexity of the project. But now, the Contractor is working on the final punch list items and we expect to submit the necessary Construction Quality Assurance information to the NCDNER in the coming weeks in order to obtain a Permit to Operate MSW Phase 3. Having MSW Phase 3 on line will allow the County better opportunities for the proper management and disposal of MSW waste and control of leachate at the White Oak Landfill. Haywood County is committed to addressing the issues raised in the Facility Compliance Audit Report and will work diligently to correct the noted deficiencies. The County appreciates your consideration of their response to the deficiencies noted in the Facility Compliance Audit Report received May 12, 2010, and should you have any questions or require additional information please give us a call. Sincerely, McGILL ASSOCIATES A. fJE(FO.El R. BISHO , PE Senior Project Manager Enclosure cc: Mr. Marty Stamey, Haywood County Assistant County Manager, w/enc Mr. Stephen King, Haywood County Solid Waste Director, w/enc Mr. Paul Crissman, NCDENR, w/enc Mr. Ed Mussler, NCDENR, w/enc Mr. Zinith Barbee, NCDENR, w/enc Mr. Allen Gaither, NCDENR, w/enc Ms. Deb Aja, NCDENR, w/enc Mr. Donald Herndon, NCDENR, w/enc Mr. Mark Poindexter, NCDENR, w/enc P:\2007\07518\Letters\akljunel0-Audit Report Response.doc ,� ,� ' �' � . �s �« ` � � �� � � ' , . . . ,` ! .� , � � ��! � . 2 �� { f ) �}� |. , ,�, �l�. � ' ' \z ` )` /4 � / .{�} l . � � �� ! f � ,� �,� . , ! . .\�. <` / ■ s � � \ (| � ��� a 7� /� . � � « : �ƒ j � f | ,,' t £� \� � ! . \# � � � 7 �� ��' �' �� ,' ,� , ! � � ��f� ! �� .! ,, ,!, ,,l ,, �»' � �! �« � ��� � !, , � ■ � ! � � ,� ! ,� ,� r' ,� �' � ! �� 2 � � ! ��! r' , � ,�` . �� � ■ !! « % � � �' !�' &« ! f ■ ! � � � ,,� !,' , � ` ���| � « ,,� �, , , ��, �! ! , s | |� � i ,,� ��!/ a� \! �| ��` �� � ,■ $ � ! | �� � | !��` ,t�' ,�� !� � , � �� � ,�' ,�� ,.' ��� 9 $■� �` ,� �`'�' �� « ! �|� � � �� � �� ,,���� s !| ! �,,■ ,�� ,, � » � �� � | |��� � | � . �!�! �� « | | �!l!�'� �, ��,�, !�! �� � � �� �!�! ,���,,��' ,! �!'� ! » 4 �,,1�� � Z ¥ 7 � �a : >�,�l,� � „ ` r� / � � � � i ! �{! | � � `! : `a . : � � � � ! f � � � � ! �� • � � � � ! � ! ���| , ` � � �� � �� ! `� � '� «� � a ! �! � � � � a �� ��l|�! « � �! `� � � 2 � , f � � � � : ! � � � ! ` � � ! . � � ! ` � ¥ � . � . ! � ! !, . NO eU 11 3• 91 k Al t7777Ell ,'�"' OE Y r J i A$�izF2V t V j mw 3p t — A E i a (�n -zi . A ', f f 11 % i Ica 17 RECEIVED Haywood County Department of Solid Waste J U N - 8 2010 Management SOLID WASTE SECTION 278 Recycle Road, Clyde, North Carolina 28734, Ph.: (828)627-8042, Fax: (828)6 ,7,1g 114- REGIONAL OFFICE June 4, 2010 Ms. Andrea Keller, Waste Management Specialist Solid Waste Section Division of Waste Management North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources 2090 U.S. Highway 70 Swannanoa, North Carolina 28778 Re: Request for Demonstration Period for Mulch/Soil Material as an Alternate Daily Cover Haywood County White Oak MSW Landfill, Permit # 44-07 (Resubmit due to availability of material on site) Dear Ms. Keller, The Haywood County Department of Solid Waste Management is formally requesting the use of an Alternate Daily Cover (ADC) at the White Oak Landfill. The Department proposes a 180 day demonstration period, during which Field Specialists with the Solid Waste Section will be able to verify the ADC's effectiveness in meeting the requirements of Rules .1626(2)(a) and (b). The proposed ADC will consist of six inches of a mixture of soil and mulch material such that a proportion of 3:1, soil to mulch, will be used in place of six inches of cover soil materials. The County will use the mulched material on an availability basis primarily in wet landfill access areas. The mulched material will be generated on site at the proposed grinding and mulching treatment and processing facility, which is currently under permit review by the Permitting Branch of the Solid Waste Section of the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources. All operations of the treatment facility will be in accordance with Section .0300 of the Solid Waste Rules, as described in the Mulching and Grinding Treatment and Processing Operations Plan submitted to the Permitting Branch. The ADC mulch will be applied to the landfill as described below. The County would like to begin the ADC demonstration period as soon as possible. This demonstration period will offer the County the opportunity to review grinding and mulching treatment and processing procedures as well as ADC mulch application procedures prior to finalizing the Operations Plan for each. Operations Plan: ADC Mulched Material At the discretion of the landfill operator, in place of six inches of cover soil materials, by the end of each day of operations, the horizontal or lateral expansion of the working face will be covered with at least six inches of a mixture of mulched material and cover soil materials. The mulch/soil mixture will consist of a ratio of 1: 3, mulched material to soil. Mulched material will be transported to the landfill and stockpiled in an area out of the way of current operations and access. Three stockpiles of dirt equal to the size of the mulch stockpile will be placed with the mulch. An excavator or bulldozer will be used to mix the soil and mulch materials by rolling the material together as it covers. Thank you for your time and consideration of this request. Please contact me at your convenience should you need any additional information or have any additional requirements of this department with regards to the request. I look forward to your response. Sincerely, Stephen King Director of Solid Waste Management, Haywood County cc: David Cotton, Haywood County Manager Jeff Bishop, McGill Associates Allen Gaither, Regional Engineer, NCDENR