4407_ROSCANS_2008

Construction and Demolition Debris Landfill Unit
On March 19, 2008 at Approx. 10:00 AM, Mr. Troy Harrison, DWM-SWS-ARO
Received a call from Mr. Steven King, Haywood Co. Solid Waste Director concerning
a leachate breakout that morning. Mr. King took photos and samples to be analyzed.
He was concerned that oil or diesel fuel had been dumped here since a theft of fuel had
been reported the previous week. I was not able to go to the landfill that day due to a
previously scheduled appointment. I advised Mr. King to take photos and document
remediation activity. The weather was very windy and rainy that day.
On March 20, 2008 Mr. Harrison met Mr. King at the Haywood Co. T & P Facility and
went to the C & D Landfill together. At the time of inspection, there were several
additional leachate breakouts due to the rain the day before. Mr. Harrison took several
photos. Mr. Harrison observed three breakouts just above the drainage ditch with
leachate flowing out of the holes into the drainage ditch. The leachate had a black
color with a strong sulfur/chemical smell. Several spill control mats and socks had
been placed to help contain the leachate. The remainder of the leachate from this area
then flowed off of the footprint of the landfill. There were also three leachate
breakouts below the entrance road but still on the landfill. These appear to not have
left the landfill. Looking at an overall photo of the C & D Landfill, it appears that all
of the leachate breakouts ultimately originated from the same general location.
After the inspection, Mr. Harrison contacted Mr. Dennis Shackelford, SWS Field
Operations Branch -Eastern Regional Supervisor for further instructions. Mr.
Shackelford said that the liquid was leachate and must be contained within the landfill
footprint. Mr. Harrison then contacted Mr. King and instructed him to contain the
leachate within the footprint of the landfill and he said that it would be done. Mr. King
called Mr. Harrison back for instruction on how to handle the LCID that normally goes
to the C & D landfill since the road will be temporally out of service. He suggested
that this material be placed at the former grinding area until it can be deposited in the
landfill. Mr. Harrison contacted Mr. Shackelford who agreed with the temporary
solution. Mr. Harrison then contacted Mr. King and gave approval to put the LCID at
the former grinding area until repairs are made to the C & D landfill.
4. On March 24, 2007 Mr. Harrison and Ms. Deb Aja, SWS Field Operations Branch -
Eastern Regional Supervisor, received an e-mail from Mr. King relaying the results of a
preliminary field test using an Horiba U-22 on March 19, 2008. A through
analytical test is forthcoming at a later date.
Please contact me if you have any questions or concerns regarding this audit report.

DIVISION OF WASTE MANAGEMENT
SOLID WASTE COMPLAINT FORM
COUNTY HAY Wow
COMPLAINANT NAME: A/V GN V A &S
ADDRESS:
TELEPHONE:
NAME OF SUSPECT VIOLATOR: A\/Wo-1,1`� GJ N I T— 6 A I
NATURE OF COMPLAINT: diL a) ` M/Its �� GtJ�C� r-ucL t acs
CMS G
i�CA2rUP, GmPi P-46?A9C NKf
STREET ADDRESS: GUkIL0Zhc- OZ-J)
DIRECTIONS TO SITE: /!/'� Z1 �1 L/?�„c� 7tCS //v
O ti C,o100
IS THERE ANY REASON TO SUSPECT THAT SITUATION IS DANGEROUS?: ❑ YES
RECEIVED BY: ❑ NO (,(/�4 ci��s�
DATE:
TIME: p
INVESTIGATED BY:
DATE OF INVESTIGATION:
1
COMMENTS: 7P aY

- ----------
A-5
3?
A
.10;
n
r
'AN
n
"IS
—7
ri
17"
o4 •sit z 3: 0
Cf)
F m
M
cz m 9
A
2
v,
Co DRAINAGE LAYER GRADES WHITE OAK MSW LANDFILL
m
STRUCTION DRAvANGS
1ASWPHASC3
m LEACHATE COLLECTION HAYWOOD COUNTY�A s s 0. 1 A T T_ S'
1 4 1 ERI N 0 -FLA 11
SYSTEM "I HAYWOOD COUNW. NORTHCAROLINA

By law PCB's are no longer used as dielectrics in transformers and capacitors manufactured
after 1979. There are many millions of pounds of PCBs still in use or in storage. One
example is the ballasts used in fluorescent light fixtures. It has been estimated that there are
between 0.5 million and 1.5 billion ballasts currently in use in this country. Due to the long
life of these units, about half of these may be of pre-1979 manufacture and contain PCBs.
Since each ballast contains about one ounce of nearly pure PCB fluid, there are about 20 to 30
million pounds of PCBs in existing lighting fixtures. These items are not the subject to
RCRA Subtitle D Waste Screening!
Commercial or industrial sources of PCB wastes that should be addressed by the program
include:
Mineral oil and dielectric fluids containing PCB:.;
• Contaminated soil, dredged material, sewage sludge, rags, and other debris from a release
of PCBs;
• Transformers and other electrical equipment containing dielectric fluids; and
Hydraulic machines.
2. PCB Regulatory Requirements
As contrasted to hazardous wastes, the Toxic Substance Control Act regulates PCBs based on
the concentration of PCBs in the waste rather than the source or characteristic of the waste.
The regulations concerning PCB disposal are spelled out in 40 CFR Part 761. Subtitle D of
RCRA merely requires that PCB waste not be disposed in a MSW landfill. PCB management
requirements include:
Waste containing more than 500 ppm of PCBs must be incinerated. Waste containing from 50
to 500 ppm must be disposed of by incineration„ approved burning, or in chemical waste
landfill • permitted to receive such wastes. The regulations are silent concerning wastes
containing less than 50 ppm of PCBs; however, the regulations cannot be circumvented by
diluting stronger wastes.
E:%duaunentslhaywood\98010pro Ich 03/16/00 159
8TO/T00P 'Soossv 11111DO7i £E M9 XVJ RV:VT 800Z/LO/ZO

D. FUNDAMENTALS OF WASTE SCREENING
1. Know Your Generators and Haulers
Since the level of sophistication of your waste screening program will be a reflection of the
likelihood of hazardous waste and PCB waste being in your incoming waste, knowledge of
the commercial industrial base of vour service area is critical. Some examples are the
automotive industry, which generates solvents, paint wastes, lead acid batteries, grease and
oil; the dry cleaning industry, which may generate filters containing dry cleaning solvents;
metal platers which generate heavy metal wastes, and other industries which generate a variety
of undesirable wastes; e.g. chemical and related products, petroleum refining, primary metals,
electrical and electronic machinery, etc.
Landfill managers should also know the haulers and trucks serving the businesses in their
community which are likely to carry unacceptable wastes.
Some local governments and solid waste management agencies have enacted legislation
requiring haulers to provide a manifest showing the customers whose wastes make up that
particular load. Such a manifest is an extremely useful tool when a load is found to contain
prohibited wastes. It is unwise to accept wastes from unknown, unlicensed, or otherwise
questionable haulers.
2. Inspections
An inspection is typically a visual observation of the incoming waste loads by an individual
who is trained to identify regulated hazardous or PCB wastes that would not be acceptable for
disposal at the MSWLF unit. The training of landfill personnel will be conducted by a local
EMS official or a SWANA certification. An inspection is considered satisfactory if the
inspector knows the nature of all materials received in the load and is able to discern whether
the materials are potentially regulated hazardous wastes or PCB wastes.
Ideally, all loads should be screened; however, it i:: generally not practical to inspect in detail
all incoming loads. Random inspections, therefore, can be used to provide a reasonable means
to adequately control the receipt of inappropriate, wastes. Random inspections are simply
inspections made on less than every load. At a minimum the inspection frequency will not be
less than. one percent of the waste stream.
The frequency of random inspections may be based on the type and quantity of wastes
received' daily, and the accuracy and confidence desired in conclusions drawn from inspection
observations. Because statistical parameters are riot provided in the .regulation, a reasoned,
knowledge -based approach may be taken. A random inspection program may take many
forms such as inspecting every incoming load one bay out of every month or inspecting one or
more loads from transporters of wastes of unidentifiable nature each day. If these inspections
indicate that unauthorized wastes are being brought to the MSWLF site, the random
inspection program should be modified to increase the frequency of inspections.
E:xdonunentsViaywood\99010ptc lch ONW00 160
8T0/Z0011 'SooSSv 111DDW M6M 1H3 8V:VT 800Z/L0/Z0

Inspection priority also can be given to haulers with. unknown service areas, to loads brought
to the facility in vehicles not typically used for disposal of municipal solid waste, and to loads
transported by previous would-be offenders. For wastes of unidentifiable nature received
from sources other than households (e.g., indus-:rial or commercial establishments), the
inspector should question the transporter about the source/composition of the materials.
Loads will be inspected on the tipping floor at the baler facility prior to actual disposal of the
waste at the working face of the landfill unit to provide the County the opportunity to refuse
or accept: the wastes.
An inspection flow chart to identify, accept, or refuse solid waste is provided as Figure 1.
Inspections of materials may be accomplished by discharging the vehicle load in an area
designed to contain potentially hazardous wastes gnat may arrive at the facility. The waste
should be carefully spread for observation using a front end loader or other piece of
equipment. The Division of Solid Waste recommends that waste should be hand raked to
spread the load. Personnel should be trained to identify suspicious wastes. Some indications
of suspicious wastes are:
• Hazardous placards or markings;
• Liquids;
• Powders or dusts;
• Sludges;
• Bright or unusual colors,
• Drums or commercial size containers; or
• Chemical odors.
Haywood County will follow these procedures when suspicious wastes are discovered.
• Segregate the wastes,
• Question the driver,
• Review the manifest (if applicable);
• Contact possible source;
• Call the State Solid;Waste Management Department,
• Use appropriate protective equipment;
• Contact laboratory support if required; and
• Notify the local Hazardous Material Response Team.
Containers with contents that are not easily identifiable, such as unmarked 55-gallon drums,
should be opened only by properly trained personnel. Because these drums could contain
hazardous waste, they should be refused whenever- possible. Upon verifying that the solid
waste is acceptable, it may then be transferred to the! working face for disposal.
EMocumcnu\hay-Md198010ptc Ich 03/16/00 161
8TO/E00I1 'SOOSSV TIIDON V996ZSZ XVJ WVT 800Z/LO/ZO

Testing typically would include the Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure (TCLP) and
other tests for characteristics of hazardous washes including corrositivity, ignitability, and
reactivity. Wastes that are suspected of being hazardous should be handled and stored as a
hazardous waste until a determination is made.
If the wastes temporarily stored at the site are determined to be hazardous, Haywood County
is responsible for the management of the waste. If the wastes are to be transported from the
facility, the waste must be: (1) stored at the MSWLF facility in accordance with requirements
of a hazardous waste generator, (2) manifested, (3) transported by a licensed Treatment,
Storage, or Disposal (TSD) facility for disposal.
E. RECORD KEEPING AND NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS
Records must be kept pursuant to an incident where regulated hazardous waste or prohibited
waste is found at the landfill. It is also recommended that records be kept of all screening
activities and incidents, whether or not, regulated or prohibited wastes are found. This will
help prove that the landfill owner/operator has acted in a prudent and reasonable manner.
The best way to prove compliance with this requirement is to document each inspection
including:
Date and time of waste detection
Hauler name (company and driver)
Waste(s) detected
Waste generator(s) if able to identify
Action(s) taken to manage or return material(s)
Efforts taken if extreme toxicity or hazard was discovered
Landfill employee in responsible charge .
40 CFR Part 258 requires that records should be rnaintained at or near the landfill site during
its active life and as long after as may be required by the appropriate state or local regulations.
EAd=imuus\haywoodW8010V1C Ich 03/16100 _ 162
8TO/V0001 'SOOSSV TII OR £££6ZSZ XVJ 6V:VT 800Z/GO/ZO

Waste inspected by Personnel Trained
to Recognize Hazardous Wastes Prior
to Delivery at Working Face
Waste is identified as Waste is not Readily Waste is Identified as a
163

WASTE SCREENING CHECK LIST
CONTAINERS YES NO
FULL.................................................................
PARTIALLYFULL ...............................................
EMPTY..............................................................
CRUSHED..........................................................
PUNCTURED......................................................
POWDERS/DUSTS
IDENTIFIED.....................................................
UNKNOWN.......................................................
SATURATION...................................................
LABEL/I-IAZARDOUS..........................................
ODOR/FUMES
STRONG..........................................................
FAINT.............................................................
HEAT..............................................................
ITEMS FOUND
BATTERIES.......................................................
OIL.................................................................
BIOMEDICAL ...................................................
RADIOACTIVE..................................................
ASHES/RESIDUE................................... . ............
SOD/SOIL.........................................................
LIQUID............................................................
HAZARDOUS....................................................
PCB'S........................................................ . .....
CHECK ALL THAT APPLY
- E:`docuinrntsUmywoodk9S010prc Ich 0n6/00 164
8T0/9001A 'S90S9v 1111931V £££6Z9Z XHq 6V:%T 900Z/L0/Z0

WASTE SOURCE
ADDRESS
PROBABLE[ ]
WASTE HAULER
ADDRESS
DRIVER'S NAME
DETAIL
DETAILED SCREENING REPORT
SUSPECTED [ ]
CONFIRMED [ ]
NOTIFIED:
WASTE SOURCE [ ] HAULING MANAGEMENT [ ] SITE MANAGEMENT [ ]
STATE[ ] FEDERAL[ ]
NAME
WITNESS (IF ANY
DATE TIME AM PM
ACTION REQUIRED
Ei d%:mnentslhaywoo&9A010ptc (ch OY16I00
8T0/LOO
soossv 'IZIDOW
165
£££6Z9Z XVJ 6Y:%T 900Z/L0/Z0

5.4 Appendix H
HAYWOOD COUNTY SYNTHETIC COVER OPERATION PLAN
1. Determine the size of the area to be covered. Be sure to allow for five to ten feet extra on
each measurement to ensure that the refuse is completely covered.
2. The synthetic cover is shipped to the landfill site with panels folded accordion -type, then
rolled up. Unroll the cover along the working face (depending upon operations), and attach
the leading edge of the unrolled panel to existing landfill equipment with ropes(i.e., to the top
of the blade).
3. Pull the sewn panels of cover across the compacted trash. The synthetic cover maybe pulled
from any direction, which may vary from day to day. Keep the leading edge between the two
machines (or people) as high as possible to eliminate drag.
4. Anchor the edges of synthetic cover every 20 feet with tires or sandbags to hold the synthetic
cover in place. If it is windy, more anchoring may be required. Make sure a large enough
panel has been ordered to completely cover the refilse (base this on the heaviest day to the
week). If complete coverage is not possible, cover the exposed refuse with soil; but take care
not to place too much dirt on the synthetic cover if it is to be re -used.
5. On the next day of operations, remove the tires and/or sandbags. Simply pull the synthetic
cover across itself (to reduce drag) and off the refuse to an area that is inactive. Anchor the
edges again to prevent wind from lifting the blanket. At the end of the day, pull the synthetic
cover back across the refuse by repeating steps 3 and 4 until a new panel is needed.
Synthetic Cover is designed to be used as landfill daily cover on a working face. For best results, it is
recommended that the area to be covered be kept as close to a square shape as possible not to exceed
75' X 75' in size. Not only does this procedure allow :For easier coverage, it allows for better
management of the working face and saves time at the end of the working day.
Haywood County will. use a panel o'fsynthetic cover that is pulled over the working face on a daily
basis by two pieces of landfill equipment. At the end of the working day, the panel will be secured in
place. This is attained by one of two methods -- the panel may be heavy enough to hold itself in place
due to accumulation of soil and is left in that manner; Or tires are placed on the panel to secure it in
place.
The working face is operated in this manner, brought to an intermediate grade and then covered with
the required six (6) inches of soil. The process will continue until a lift is completed. The process is
then started over on the next lift until the landfill is filled to final grade and a section is closed. At a
minimum six (6) inches of soil cover -will be used once a we.k.
@;tdocwnuius ioywoodWR010ptc Ith 03+I6i00 166
8T0/900[A 'SOOSSV 11IO3W M6Z9Z XVA 09:bT 900Z/L0/Z0

TIPS TO REMEMBER
1. Always pull the fabric across itself during installation and removal to make each panel.
last as long as possible.
2. Avoid driving on the panel(s); this may cause punctures and tears.
3. Tie the panel(s) to the top of the dozer blade and raise the blade to minimize
dragging on refuse.
4, Use tires or sandbags to hold the panel(s) down overnight. Soil can be used if you
plan to leave panel(s) in place and cover with refuse,
5. Minimize stress between dozer/compactors while pulling on the panel(s).
EAdocwncnMu) ved'',oR010pIc lch 03/16/00
167
9TO/600[PI 'SOOSSV TIIDDIV £££ M XVA 09:VT 800Z/GO/ZO

5.5 Appendix III
EXPLOSIVE GAS CONTROL PLAN FOR - HA.YWOOD COUNTY
Quarterly the Haywood County landfill will monitor the explosive gas at the landfill structures and at
or near the landfill boundary. The permanent probes will consist of a plastic stand pipe similar to a
piezometer used for groundwater detection. A typical permanent methane probe is detailed in the
operation drawings. The permanent probe will be constructed at a depth of six (6) feet. A 6"
diameter hole will contain a one (1) inch slotted PVC pipe. The bottom two (2) feet will be backfilled
with non -carbonate pea gravel with a bentonite seal one (1) foot thick above it. The remaining three
(3) feet will be backfilled with in situ soils. The one (1) inch PVC pipe will be approximately three
(3) feet above the existing grade. The PVC pipe will be capped with a one (1) inch PVC cap, one
quarter (1/4) inch NPT hose barb, and V tubing, plugged or capped.
The location and spacing of the methane monitoring probes is somewhat arbitrary. The locations
were determined by the relationship of solid waste with property lines and landfill structures. The
spacing of the monitoring probes is between 200 and 400 feet. The migration of methane gas is
induced by pressure gradients. The methane will move from areas of high pressure to those of low
pressure following the path of least resistance. The methane will migrate vertically until it reaches the
landfill cap, where it will begin to flow horizontally. This occurs until it finds a pathway out, either by
the installed methane collection trenches or migration through the permeable in situ soils. Since
methane is lighter than air, it wants to escape into the atmosphere. It has been our experience that
whenever gas is migrating no matter what the spacing or depth of the monitoring probes, the gas will
fill the void created by the monitoring point and an explosive meter will monitor the level. The six
foot depth of the monitoring probes is to ensure a stable monitoring point. The only time a shallow
monitoring point has not worked is in a very heavy, impermeable clay layer that acts as a seal to the
migration of the gas. If a clay layer is encountered during the construction of the monitoring points,
it will either be moved beyond the clay or excavated to a depth that is in the conductive zone below
the clay.
The permanent probes will surround Phase 2. Haywood County's landfill is designed with a base liner
system and cap system, there should be no migration of methane in the permeable in .situ soils.
The gas can be detected by use of an instrument that reports the percent of lower explosive limit. The
instrument being used is the Gas Tech GP 204.
Quarterly, a County employee will visit each monitoring point either the temporary or permanent.
The monitoring points consist of all methane probes and le.achate collection system cleanouts. Using
the detection instrument, he will determine if methane gas has filled the probes. If the probe is near
the property line and methane gas is detected at or beyond the lower explosive limit (100% LEL), it
must then be deternned if the gas is migrating across the landfill boundary. If the probe is on the
boundary or methane gas has migrated beyond the boundary , a remediation plan must be completed
by Haywood County.
E: dttumm%u%aywoodM010ptc Ich 03/16/00 168
8TO/OTO[al 'Soossv 1119DN £££6Z99 WA 09:VT 900Z/L0190

Other points of monitoring will be the landfill structures. Each structure will be monitored , for
methane using the following methods:
1. All crawl spaces will be monitored;
2. All corners in the structure will be monitored;
3. Any holes, cracks and pipes through the foundation will be monitored
If methane gas is detected beyond 25% of its lower explosive limit in any structure, check the
calibration of the monitor and resample. If the reading is still above 25%, evacuate the building and
try to find the source of gas. If the source is found try to remove the source. If this fails a
remediation plan is stated in the operational requirements.
EAdouunentAhaywoodkoB010pic lch 03/16/00 - 169
8T0/TT01P1 'SDOSSV 111DON CC96ZSZ XVd T9:VT 90OZ/GO/ZO

5.6 Appendix IV
HAYWOOID COUNTY'S RECIRCULATION PLAN
Haywood County does intend to utilize recirculation as a means of disposal of their leachate. The
intention is to utilize recirculation as a method by which some relief can be given to the pumping and
hauling. This relief will come in the form of evaporation and retention of water within the solid
waste. The remaining leachate will be hauled to the Waynesville Waste Water Treatment Plant for
disposal. Haywood County must obtain a permit from the Division of Solid Waste before leachate
recirculation can begin.
No water that comes in contact with the present surface of .solid waste runs off any where other than
the leachate collection system.
The County will spread the leachate over the surface of the solid waste, that is at a minimum five feet
(5') deep, within the landfill. The spreading will be accomplished by one of two methods. The first
method is by simply backing their leachate hauling truck into the landfill. A spreader hose will then be
attached to the leachate tank and Haywood County personnel will manually discharge the leachate
over the solid waste. The second method will utilize the tank truck except the leachate will be used
to wet down solid waste that is piled up from being dumped from a truck or trucks. Once this pile is
wet, it will be spread around the working face by the trash compactor.
At a later date, a pump system may be incorporated into the system. The pump system will pump
directly from the leachate lagoon and the leachate spread in a manner as it was from the tank truck.
Monthly monitoring will be performed to measure the leachate head at the leachate head detection
well and analyze the leachate -for BOD; COD, temperature and pH.
The following conditions will be met by Haywood County:
• A rain gauge and thermometer will be placed on site
• A base line sampling of leachate has been performed (See Attachment 1)
• A brief description of the equipment and its associated specifications is submitted (see Attachment 2)
• Weekly record of leachate head measurements (see Attachment 3)
• Weekly record of leachate recirculated and leachate disposed (see Attachment 4)
• Weekly record of visual monitoring log (see Attachment $)
• Weekly record of rainfall and lagoon depth (see Attachment 6)
• Records will be kept on a weekly basis -
• No leachate will be applied on less than one lift (8 feet) of waste
• No leachate will be recirculated when it is raining, or when the waste is too wet
• No run off or side seepage will be allowed
• Odors will be controlled
• Leachate depth will be monitored in the leachate head detection well to ensure that the head on the liner does
not exceed one foot for more than 24 hours.
• The application system will be properly maintained and documented
i • Leachate will be tested every 30 days and a progress report will be submitted
annually
E:ldocumentslhaywoodl9601opte Ich 03I16/00 170
8TO/ZTO[PI SOOSSV III9olu £££6Z9Z XVd TS:VT SOOZ/LO/ZO

ATTACHMENT 1
:BASELINE DATA
TO BE ADDED IN THE FUTURE
E ldonnnentsViaywood\99010ptc Ich 03/16/00 _ 171
9TO/£TOM 'soossv 11,1103u £££6999 XVJ T9:bT 90091LO190

:.j
r
T
E:XdocouienlsMiaywood\96O)Oplc Icb 03/16/OD
8TO/VTOCl31
172
SDOSSV I IIDDW £££699Z XVA TS:VT 80OZ/LO/ZO

i
9
ATTACHMENT 3
HAYWOOD COUNTY LEACHATtREAD READINGS
E Ndocumrnts\haywood1A8010p1c Ich 03/16/00
8TO/9TOA
SOOSSV 111DON
173
£££6Z9Z XVJ ZS:VT 900Z/L0/Z0

ATTACHMENT 4
HAYWOOD COUNTY LEACHATE RECIRCULATION DATA
Tpi; T�A:U1.D
DATE 'YECIl2CUI ATI®N k FOR OISI'O�L
RECIRCULATED
(SeGtron `of Landfill]
6:ldocumenalhaywood198010ptc Ich 03116100
174
8TO/9TOIA 'SOOSSV 'Illoo I M6ZSZ XH3 ZS:6T SOOZ/GO/ZO

ATTACHMENT'S
HAYWOOD COUNTY VISUAL MONITORING LOG
E:ldocianrnts\haywood\98010plc Ich 03/16/00 _ 175
8TO/LTOP 'SOOSSV 'PII9ow M6Z5Z XVd Z9:6T 800Z/LO/ZO

Haywood County Solid Waste
278 Recycle Road
Clyde, NC 28721
Telephone: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
Stephen King
Solid Waste Director
February 7, 2008
Mr. Larry Frost, Regional Engineer
NCDENR
Division of Solid Waste Management
Asheville Regional Office
2090 US Highway 70
Swannanoa, North Carolina 28778
Re: Request Modification of Landfill Permit 44-07; Haywood County MSW Landfill:
Final Approval of Alternate Daily Cover
Dear Mr. Frost:
This letter serves as a formal request for approval of the below listed Alternate Daily Cover (ADC) on a full-
time basis at the Haywood County MSW Landfill; Permit #44-07. This letter is in response to your ADC
Demonstration Authorization Letter, dated June 28' 2007. This letter is also accompanied by a separate Permit
modification request for operational changes at the permitted Treatment and Processing facility under a
separate cover. The following Demonstration Report follows generally follows the Draft Approval Process
letter that was attached to the Demonstration Authorization Letter. Also attached are photos illustrating the
ADC in place, an approval letter from Jim Patterson, DENR Waste Specialist in this region, and a revised
facility Operation Plan.
Demonstration Report:
Alternate Daily Cover: Landfill Tarp System:
Landpac Cover by PacTec Inc.
6-oz. Coated Woven Polypropylene
Properties
Test Method
Value
Coating
1.5-Mil, one side
Weight
7.5-oz/yd2 coated
Thickness
20-Mil
Color
White
Warp Grab
ASTM D 5034-90
370-1bs.
Weft Grab
ASTM D 5034-90
380-1bs.
Warp Tear
ASTM D 2261-83
170-lbs.

Stephen King
Solid Waste Director
Weft Tear
Mullen Burst
Haywood County Solid Waste
278 Recycle Road
Clyde, NC 28721
Telephone: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
ASTM D 2261-83
ASTM D 3786-87
Puncture ASTM D 4833
Accelerated UV Weathering ASTM G53
Application/Removal, Storage and Maintenance of the ADC:
160-lbs.
800 psi
106-1bs.
>70% @ 1200 hrs.
Each day at closing, the ADC tarp is walked onto the landfill face by attaching the two leading corners
of the tarp to landfill equipment (loader, dozer) via the integrated D-ring clips. Final placement of the tarp is
completed by hand as the operators adjust the tarp to ensure proper coverage. Blocks are attached at the
corners and edges of the tarp to prevent displacement of the tarp due to high winds. Each morning, the blocks
are removed and the cover is walked -off of the working face and stored at an adjacent area of the landfill.
Care is taken to make sure that no vehicle traffic or landfill equipment is allowed to pass over the cover,
which could result in shearing or tearing of the cover. Each morning and afternoon the tarp is inspected for
tears. Should a break in the tarp be discovered, an attempt will be made to repair the area by stitching the
material together. If a repair is inadequate or can not be made, the tarp will be replaced. Another tarp will be
stored at the Treatment and Processing Facility adjacent to the landfill at all times for emergency replacement.
Coverage
The landfill tarp ADC is 48-ft x 50-ft in size. The fill area will be maintained so that the ADC
completely covers the entire working face each day. Any additional areas of uncovered waste (horizontal
progression, side slopes and etcetera) will be covered each day with 6-inches of soil or approved mixture of
soil and mulch. On rare occasions, such as the beginning or end of a landfill lift, it may be necessary to
maintain a larger working face. Under such circumstances, the second tarp will be taken to the landfill for
additional temporary coverage. The second tarp will be placed so that a maximum overlapping of the tarps is
maintained.
Adverse Weather and Contingency Plans:
Due to the porous nature of the ADC, the tarp does not hold water, which might shear the taip or make
it difficult to apply/remove the tarp each day. Therefore, it is unnecessary to modify use of the ADC during
wet weather conditions. Should a heavy snow be predicted, or occurring at the time of closing, the working
face would be covered with a minimum of 6-inches of soil or approved soil and mulch mixture to prevent the

Haywood County Solid Waste
278 Recycle Road
Clyde, NC 28721
Telephone: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
Stephen King
Solid Waste Director
risk of tearing the taip during removal the next morning. During periods of high winds, extra weight will be
added to the tarp and/or a narrow layer of soil and rocks will be applied to the edges of the tarp to prevent
displacement of the tarp. In the event that the ADC can not be utilized for any reason, the working face will
be covered with a minimum of 6-inches of soil or approved soil and mulch mixture until the problem is
resolved.
Additional, Miscellaneous:
Due to the nature of the ADC, no testing (TCLP) of the material occurred.
Summary of Demonstration:
The ADC tarp has been utilized daily since receiving approval for demonstration of the ADC by
DENR. Overall, the tarp has performed very well. Initially, it took the landfill operators a few days to
become accustomed to restricting the size of the working face so that coverage was maintained. Soon,
however, daily operation of the fill progression was adjusted and the smaller working face has become the
norm. We also had one instance of the tarp being partially displaced by high winds. Since that time, we have
added additional weights to the edges of the tarp, and had no reoccurrence of the problem. The lightweight
and porous nature of the material is very user friendly. As mentioned above, wet weather and moderate winds
pass over or through the material without adverse effects. Additionally, the tarp is relatively easy to
manipulate.
In total, I believe that the ADC has successfully demonstrated effectiveness in meeting the
requirements of Rule. 1626(2)(a), and request approval of a Permit Modification for the full-time use of the
ADC at the Haywood County MSW Landfill. I look forward to your response in this matter. Should you
require additional information or have any questions regarding this request, please do not hesitate to contact
me at your convenience.
Sincerely,
Stephen King
Director of Solid Waste Management

AOUNTAIN
Environmental Group
August 14, 2008
environmental consulting o assessment ® remediation - waste management
Mr. Ervin Lane
Compliance Hydrogeologist
Solid Waste Section
Division of Waste Management
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
410 Oberlin Road, Suite 150
1646 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1646
Re: Response to Compliance Order
Proposed Soil, Groundwater and Surface Water Sampling Locations
C&D Phase 1, Permit Number44-07
White Oak MSW Landfill
Haywood County, North Carolina
Dear Mr. Lane,
As you are aware, Mountain Environmental Group (MEG) conducted leachate and water
sampling activities at the C&D Phase 1 area of White Oak Landfill on March 20, 2008. This was
in response to leachate seeps observed on March 19 and 20, 2008. Containment holes were
excavated to address the seeps and leachate did not migrate beyond the permitted limits.
In an ongoing effort to ensure that leachate does not impact downgradient surface water or
groundwater, MEG on behalf of White Oak Landfill, proposes to additional soil and water
sampling. As discussed in our telephone conversation on August 13, 2008, sampling locations
will be those shown on the attached map.
Sampling activities will consist of four soil samples (one background and three from leachate-
impacted areas) and four water samples (one surface water and three from existing monitoring
wells). As discussed, additional groundwater monitoring may be required depending upon soil
sampling results. All samples will be analyzed for Appendix II VOCs (Method 8260) and SVOCs
(Method 8270) and RCRA metals (Methods 6010/7471 and 6010/7470).
If you have any questions or require assistance, please do not hesitate to contact me at 828-
648-5556.
Sincerely,
Justi 'Judd' Mahan, PG
Project Manager
1560 Pisgah Drive PHONE: [phone]
Canton, NC 28716 [phone]
www.mountainenvironmental.com FAX [phone]

Proposed sampling locations below will be
sampled and analyzed for the following -
TCLP volatiles and semi-volatiles, and
metals. -
7:7-
-----Proposed soil
sample SS-1
`\ \ V Proposed soil -Jk-
11�5� `• sample
\ Background - Exi t n ` ` \-
-- -, s i g MW-15.
Proposed water
---- - %" sample. Existina well
Proposed soil
sample SS-2
00 jProposed sc
yz m=: / •�
81 ,
Wig:ICE
`\
a,
o `` !
001
7= MAP OF OBSERVED
-� m LEACHATE 3/19/08
SS-3
Proposed water
Piezometer P-9. : ■ `
K,' Proposed water
sample. ------------
,
rr i
irrJ4600
Proposed surface
_ - -
-'/water sampling
-- location. Previously
sampled.
LANDFILL PHASE 1 OMcGM
WHITE OAK MSW LANDFILL
H AY W O O D C O U N T Y A S S O C I A T E S
HAYWOOD COUNTY. NORTH CAROLINA ENGINEERING -PLAN NIN G-FINANCE

aceAnalj&al
www.pecelabs.com
i
1
March 31, 2008
Ms. Denese Ballew
Mountain Environmental
1560 Pisgah Drive
Canton, NC 28716
RE: Project: Haywood County LF
Pace Project No.: 9215810
Dear Ms. Ballew:
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
2225 Riverside Dr.
Asheville, NC 28804
[phone]
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Enclosed are the analytical results for sample(s) received by the laboratory on March 20, 2008. The
results relate only to the samples included in this report. Results reported herein conform to the
most current NELAC standards, where applicable, unless otherwise narrated in the body of the
report.
Inorganic Wet Chemistry and Metals analyses were performed at our Pace Asheville laboratory and
Organic testing was performed at our Pace Huntersville laboratory unless otherwise footnoted. All
Microbiological analyses were performed at the laboratory where the samples were received.
If you have any questions concerning this report, please feel free to contact me.
Sincerely,
Lorri Patton
[e-mail]
Project Manager
Enclosures
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of PP,S,.
aycee+Analytical Services, Inc..
�LL�IGL
Page 1 of 15

4� / ® Pace Analytical Services, Inc. Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
aL'eN ta1�G'al 2225 Riverside Dr 9800 KinceyAve. Suite 100
www.pacelabs.com Asheville, NC 28804 Huntersville, NC 28078
j [phone] [phone]
i
CERTIFICATIONS
Project: Haywood County LF
Pace Project No.: 9215810
Charlotte Certification IDs
Florida/NELAP Certification Number: E87627
Kansas Certification Number: E-10364
Louisiana/LELAP Certification Number: 04034
North Carolina Drinking Water Certification Number: 37706
North Carolina Wastewater Certification Number: 12
North Carolina Field Services Certification Number: 5342
South Carolina Certification Number: 990060001
South Carolina Bioassay Certification Number: 990060003
Tennessee Certification Number: 04010
Virginia Certification Number: 00213
Asheville Certification IDs
Florida/NELAP Certification Number: E87648
Pennsylvania Certification Number: 68-03578
Louisiana/LELAP Certification Number: 03095
South Carolina Certification Number: 99030001
New Jersey Certification Number: NC011
South Carolina Bioassay Certification Number: 99030002
North Carolina Drinking Water Certification Number: 37712
Tennessee Certification Number: 2980
North Carolina Wastewater Certification Number: 40
Virginia Certification Number: 00072
North Carolina Bioassay Certification Number: 9
Eden Certification IDs
North Carolina Drinking Water Certification Number: 37738
North Carolina Wastewater Certification Number: 633
Virginia Drinking Water Certification Number: 00424
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..
_, 11_Cuu��ope*
Page 2 of 15

aceAnalytical
www.pacelabscom
i
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
2225 Riverside Dr.
Asheville, NC 28804
[phone]
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9800 Kinsey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Project: Haywood County LF
Pace Project No.: 9215810
Sample: Haywood C&D Sed Pond Lab ID: 9215810001 Collected: 03/19/08 15.20 Received: 03/20/08 09:30 Matrix: Solid
SL
Results reported on a "dry -weight" basis
Parameters Results Units Report Limit DF Prepared Analyzed CAS No. Qual
8270 MSSV TCLP Sep Funnel Analytical Method: EPA 8270 Preparation Method: EPA 3510
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
ND ug/L
50.0
1
03/26/08 00:00
03/27/08 07:20
106-46-7
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
ND ug/L
50.0
1
03/26/08 00:00
03/27/08 07:20
121-14-2
Hexachloro-1,3-butadiene
ND ug/L
50.0
1
03/26/08 00:00
03/27/08 07:20
87-68-3
Hexachlorobenzene
ND ug/L
50.0
1
03/26/08 00:00
03/27/08 07:20
118-74-1
Hexachloroethane
ND ug/L
50.0
1
03/26/08 00:00
03/27/08 07:20
67-72-1
2-Methylphenol(o-Cresol)
ND ug/L
50.0
1
03/26/08 00:00
03/27/08 07:20
95-48-7
3&4-Methylphenol (m&p Cresol)
ND ug/L
50.0
1
03/26/08 00:00
03/27/08 07:20
Nitrobenzene
ND ug/L
50.0
1
03/26/08 00:00
03/27/08 07:20
98-95-3
Pentachlorophenol
ND ug/L
50.0
1
03/26/08 00:00
03/27/08 07:20
87-86-5
Pyridine
ND ug/L
50.0
1
03/26/08 00:00
03/27/08 07:20
110-86-1
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
ND ug/L
50.0
1
03/26/08 00:00
03/27/08 07:20
95-95-4
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
ND ug/L
50.0
1
03/26/08 00:00
03/27/08 07:20
88-06-2
Nitrobenzene-d5 (S)
49 %
30-150
1
03/26/08 00:00
03/27/08 07:20
4165-60-0
2-Fluorobiphenyl (S)
46 %
30-150
1
03/26/08 00:00
03/27/08 07:20
321-60-8
Terphenyl-d14 (S)
52 %
30-150
1
03/26/08 00:00
03/27/08 07:20
1718-51-0
Phenol-d6 (S)
13 %
30-150
1
03/26/08 00:00
03/27/08 07:20
13127-88-3 SO
2-Fluorophenol (S)
30 %
30-150
1
03/26/08 00:00
03/27/08 07:20
367-12-4
2,4,6-Tdbromophenol (S)
46 %
30-150
1
03/26/08 00:00
03/27/08 07:20
118-79-6
8260 MSV TCLP
Analytical Method: EPA 8260
Benzene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
03/22/08 10:28
71-43-2
2-Butanone (MEK)
ND ug/L
10.0
1
03/22/08 10:28
78-93-3
Carbon tetrachloride
ND ug/L
5.0
1
03/22/08 10:28
56-23-5
Chlorobenzene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
03/22/08 10:28
108-90-7
Chloroform
ND ug/L
5.0
1
03/22/08 10:28
67-66-3
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
03/22/08 10:28
10646-7
1,2-Dichloroethane
ND ug/L
5.0
1
03/22/08 10:28
107-06-2
1,1-Dichloroethene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
03/22/08 10:28
75-35-4
Tetrachloroethene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
03/22/08 10:28
127-18-4
Trichloroethene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
03/22/08 10:28
79-01-6
Vinyl chloride
ND ug/L
5.0
1
03/22/08 10:28
75-014
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (S)
92 %
79-120
1
03/22/08 10:28
17060-07-0
Toluene-d8 (S)
100 %
70-120
1
03/22/08 10:28
2037-26-5
4-Bromofluorobenzene (S)
94 %
87-109
1
03/22/08 10:28
460-00-4
Dibromofluoromethane (S)
94 %
85-115
1
03/22/08 10:28
1868-53-7
Date: 03/31/2008 10:09 AM REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS Page 3 of 15
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace
Analytical Services, Inc..

ZaceAnalytical
www. pacelabsxom
1
r
1
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
2225 Riverside Dr.
Asheville, NC 28804
[phone]
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9800 KinceyAve. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Project: Haywood County LF
Pace Project No.: 9215810
Sample: Haywood C&D Upstream Lab ID: 9215810002 Collected: 03/19/08 15:30 Received: 03/20/08 09:30 Matrix: Solid
SL
Results reported on a "dry -weight" basis
Parameters Results Units Report Limit DF Prepared Analyzed CAS No. Qual
8270 MSSV TCLP Sep Funnel Analytical Method: EPA 8270 Preparation Method: EPA 3510
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
ND ug/L
50.0
1
03/26/08 00:00 03/27/08 07:42
106-46-7
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
ND ug/L
50.0
1
03/26/08 00:00
03/27/08 07:42
121-14-2
Hexachloro-1,3-butadiene
ND ug/L
50.0
1
03/26/08 00:00
03/27/08 07:42
87-68-3
Hexachlorobenzene
ND ug/L
50.0
1
03/26/08 00:00
03/27/08 07:42
118-74-1
Hexachloroethane
ND ug/L
50.0
1
03/26/08 00:00
03/27/08 07:42
67-72-1
2-Methylphenol(o-Cresol)
ND ug/L
50.0
1
03/26/08 00:00
03/27/08 07:42
95-48-7
3&4-Methylphenol (m&p Cresol)
ND ug/L
50.0
1
03/26/08 00:00
03/27/08 07:42
Nitrobenzene
ND ug/L
50.0
1
03/26/08 00:00
03/27/08 07:42
98-95-3
Pentachlorophenol
ND ug/L
50.0
1
03/26/08 00:00
03/27/08 07:42
87-86-5
Pyridine
ND ug/L
50.0
1
03/26/08 00:00
03/27/08 07:42
110-86-1
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
ND ug/L
50.0
1
03/26/08 00:00
03/27/08 07:42
95-95-4
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
ND ug/L
50.0
1
03/26/08 00:00
03/27/08 07:42
88-06-2
Nitrobenzene-d5 (S)
55 %
30-150
1
03/26/08 00:00
03/27/08 07:42
4165-60-0
2-Fluorobiphenyl (S)
51 %
30-150
1
03/26/08 00:00
03/27/08 07:42
321-60-8
Terphenyl-d14 (S)
58 %
30-150
1
03/26/08 00:00
03/27/08 07:42
1718-51-0
Phenol-d6 (S)
16 %
30-150
1
03/26/08 00:00
03/27/08 07:42
13127-88-3 SO
2-Fluorophenol (S)
32 %
30-150
1
03/26/08 00:00
03/27/08 07:42
367-12-4
2,4,6-Tdbromophenol (S)
49 %
30-150
1
03/26/08 00:00
03/27/08 07:42
118-79-6
8260 MSV TCLP Analytical Method: EPA 8260
Benzene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
03/22/08 10:46
71-43-2
2-Butanone (MEK)
ND ug/L
10.0
1
03/22/08 10:46
78-93-3
Carbon tetrachloride
ND ug/L
5.0
1
03/22/08 10:46
56-23-5
Chlorobenzene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
03/22/08 10:46
108-90-7
Chloroform
ND ug/L
5.0
1
03/22/08 10:46
67-66-3
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
03/22/08 10:46
106-46-7
1,2-Dichloroethane
ND ug/L
5.0
1
03/22/08 10:46
107-06-2
1,1-Dichloroethene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
03/22/08 10:46
75-35-4
Tetrachloroethene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
03/22/08 10:46
127-18-4
Trichloroethene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
03/22/08 10:46
79-01-6
Vinyl chloride
ND ug/L
5.0
1
03/22/08 10:46
75-01-4
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (S)
101 %
79-120
1
03/22/08 10:46
17060-07-0
Toluene-d8 (S)
94 %
70-120
1
03/22/08 10:46
2037-26-5
4- Bromofl uoro benzene (S)
82 %
87-109
1
03/22/08 10:46
460-00-4 S5
Dibromofluoromethane (S)
99 %
85-115
1
03/22/08 10:46
1868-53-7
Date: 03/31/200810:09 AM REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS Page 4 of 15
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..

® Pace Analytical Services, Inc. Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
acemalflkal 2225 Riverside Dr. 9800 KinceyAve. Suite too
www.pecolabs.com Asheville, NC 28804 Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone] [phone]
i
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Project: Haywood County LF
Pace Project No.: 9215810
Sample: Haywood C&D Seep SL
Lab ID: 9215810003 Collected: 03/19/08 15:30
Received: 03/20/08 09:30 Matrix: Solid
Results reported on a "dry -weight"
basis
Parameters
Results Units
Report Limit
DF
Prepared
Analyzed
CAS No. Qual
8270 MSSV TCLP Sep Funnel
Analytical Method: EPA 8270 Preparation Method: EPA 3510
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
ND ug/L
50.0
1
03/26/08 00:00
03/27/08 08:03
106-46-7
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
ND ug/L
50.0
1
03/26/08 00:00
03/27/08 08:03
121-14-2
Hexachloro-1,3-butadiene
ND ug/L
50.0
1
03/26/08 00:00
03/27/08 08:03
87-68-3
Hexachlorobenzene
ND ug/L
50.0
1
03/26/08 00:00
03/27/08 08:03
118-74-1
Hexachloroethane
ND ug/L
50.0
1
03/26/08 00:00
03/27/08 08:03
67-72-1
2-Methylphenol(o-Cresol)
ND ug/L
50.0
1
03/26/08 00:00
03/27/08 08:03
95-48-7
3&4-Methylphenol (m&p Cresol)
ND ug/L
50.0
1
03/26/08 00:00
03/27/08 08:03
Nitrobenzene
ND ug/L
50.0
1
03/26/08 00:00
03/27/08 08:03
98-95-3
Pentachlorophenol
ND ug/L
50.0
1
03/26/08 00:00
03/27/08 08:03
87-86-5
Pyridine
ND ug/L
50.0
1
03/26/08 00:00
03/27/08 08:03
110-86-1
2,4,5-Tdchlorophenol
ND ug/L
50.0
1
03/26/08 00:00
03/27/08 08:03
95-95-4
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
ND ug/L
50.0
1
03/26/08 00:00
03/27/08 08:03
88-06-2
Nitrobenzene-d5 (S)
45 %
30-150
1
03/26/08 00:00
03/27/08 08:03
4165-60-0
2-Fluorobiphenyl (S)
44 %
30-150
1
03/26/08 00:00
03/27/08 08:03
321-60-8
Terphenyl-d14 (S)
58 %
30-150
1
03/26/08 00:00
03/27/08 08:03
1718-51-0
Phenol-d6 (S)
15 %
30-150
1
03/26/08 00:00
03/27/08 08:03
13127-88-3 SO
2-Fluorophenol (S)
30 %
30-150
1
03/26/08 00:00
03/27/08 08:03
367-12-4
2,4,6-Tribromophenol (S)
57 %
30-150
1
03/26/08 00:00
03/27/08 08:03
118-79-6
8260 MSV TCLP
Analytical Method: EPA 8260
Benzene
ND ug/L
125
25
03/22/08 11:04
71-43-2
2-Butanone (MEK)
ND ug/L
250
25
03/22/08 11:04
78-93-3
Carbon tetrachloride
ND ug/L
125
25
03/22/08 11:04
56-23-5
Chlorobenzene
ND ug/L
125
25
03/22/08 11:04
108-90-7
Chloroform
ND ug/L
125
25
03/22/08 11:04
67-66-3
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
ND ug/L
125
25
03/22/08 11:04
106-46-7
1,2-Dichloroethane
ND ug/L
125
25
03/22/08 11:04
107-06-2
1,1-Dichloroethene
ND ug/L
125
25
03/22/08 11:04
75-35-4
Tetrachloroethene
ND ug/L
125
25
03/22/08 11:04
127-18-4
Trichloroethene
ND ug/L
125
25
03/22/08 11:04
79-01-6
Vinyl chloride
ND ug/L
125
25
03/22/08 11:04
75-01-4
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (S)
105 %
79-120
25
03/22/08 11:04
17060-07-0
Toluene-d8 (S)
99 %
70-120
25
03/22/08 11:04
2037-26-5
4-Bromofluorobenzene (S)
96 %
87-109
25
03/22/08 11:04
460-00-4
Dibromofluoromethane (S)
101 %
85-115
25
03/22/08 11:04
1868-53-7
Date: 03/31/200810:09 AM REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS Page 5 of 15
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..
Ut� i

aceAnai(Xical
www.pacelabs.com
i
i
Project: Haywood County LF
Pace Project No.: 9215810
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
2225 Riverside Dr.
Asheville, NC 28804
[phone]
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Sample: Haywood C&D Lab ID: 9215810004 Collected: 03/19/08 16.45 Received: 03/20/08 09:30 Matrix: Solid
Downstream
Results reported on a "dry -weight" basis
Parameters Results Units Report Limit DF Prepared Analyzed CAS No. Qual
8270 MSSV TCLP Sep Funnel
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
Hexachloro-1,3-butadiene
Hexachlorobenzene
Hexachloroethane
2-Methylphe nol(o-Cresol)
3&4-Methylphenol(m&p Cresol)
Nitrobenzene
Pentachlorophenol
Pyridine
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
2, 4, 6-Td ch I o rop he n of
Nitrobenzene-d5 (S)
2-Fluorobiphenyl (S)
Terphenyl-d14 (S)
Phenol-d6 (S)
2-Fluorophenol (S)
2,4,6-Tribromophenol (S)
8260 MSV TCLP
Benzene
2-Butanone (MEK)
Carbon tetrachloride
Chlorobenzene
Chloroform
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
1,2-Dichloroethane
1,1-Dichloroethene
Tetrachloroethene
Trichloroethene
Vinyl chloride
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (S)
Toluene-d8 (S)
4-Bromofluorobenzene (S)
Dibromofluoromethane (S)
Date: 03/31/2008 10:09 AM
Analytical Method: EPA 8270 Preparation Method: EPA 3510
ND ug/L
50.0
1
03/26/08 00:00 03/27/08 08:25
106-46-7
ND ug/L
50.0
1
03/26/08 00:00 03/27/08 08:25
121-14-2
ND ug/L
50.0
1
03/26/08 00:00 03/27/08 08:25
87-68-3
ND ug/L
50.0
1
03/26/08 00:00 03/27/08 08:25
118-74-1
ND ug/L
50.0
1
03/26/08 00:00 03/27/08 08:25
67-72-1
ND ug/L
50.0
1
03/26/08 00:00 03/27/08 08:25
95-48-7
ND ug/L
50.0
1
03/26/08 00:00 03/27/08 08:25
ND ug/L
50.0
1
03/26/08 00:00 03/27/08 08:25
98-95-3
ND ug/L
50.0
1
03/26/08 00:00 03/27/08 08:25
87-86-5
ND ug/L
50.0
1
03/26/08 00:00 03/27/08 08:25
110-86-1
ND ug/L
50.0
1
03/26/08 00:00 03/27/08 08:25
95-95-4
ND ug/L
50.0
1
03/26/08 00:00 03/27/08 08:25
88-06-2
39 %
30-150
1
03/26/08 00:00 03/27/08 08:25
4165-60-0
38 %
30-150
1
03/26/08 00:00 03/27/08 08:25
321-60-8
54 %
30-150
1
03/26/08 00:00 03/27/08 08:25
1718-51-0
11 %
30-150
1
03/26/08 00:00 03/27/08 08:25
13127-88-3 SO
32 %
30-150
1
03/26/08 00:00 03/27/08 08:25
367-12-4
48 %
30-150
1
03/26/08 00:00 03/27/08 08:25
118-79-6
Analytical Method: EPA 8260
ND ug/L
5.0
1
03/22/08 10:10
71-43-2
ND ug/L
10.0
1
03/22/08 10:10
78-93-3
ND ug/L
5.0
1
03/22/08 10:10
56-23-5
ND ug/L
5.0
1
03/22/08 10:10
108-90-7
ND ug/L
5.0
1
03/22/08 10:10
67-66-3
ND ug/L
5.0
1
03/22/08 10:10
106-46-7
ND ug/L
5.0
1
03/22/08 10:10
107-06-2
ND ug/L
5.0
1
03/22/08 10:10
75-35-4
ND ug/L
5.0
1
03/22/08 10:10
127-18-4
ND ug/L
5.0
1
03/22/08 10:10
79-01-6
ND ug/L
5.0
1
03/22/08 10:10
75-01-4
97 %
79-120
1
03/22/08 10:10
17060-07-0
95 %
70-120
1
03/22/08 10:10
2037-26-5
87 %
87-109
1
03/22/08 10:10
460-00-4
99 %
85-115
1
03/22/08 10:10
1868-53-7
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..
A I lac
Page 6 of 15

aeeAnaokal
www.pacelabs.com
i
Project: Haywood County LF
Pace Project No.: 9215810
Sample: Haywood C&D Sed Pond
WT
Parameters
8270 MSSV TCLP Sep Funnel
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
Hexachloro-1,3-butadiene
Hexachlorobenzene
Hexachloroethane
2-Methyl phenol(o-Cresol)
3&4-Methylphenol (m&p Cresol)
Nitrobenzene
Pentachlorophenol
Pyridine
2,4,5-Tdch lorophenol
2,4, 6-Trichlorophe nol
Nitrobenzene-d5 (S)
2-Fluorobiphenyl (S)
Terphenyl-d14 (S)
Phenol-d6 (S)
2-Fluorophenol (S)
2,4,6-Tdbromophenol (S)
8260 MSV TCLP
Benzene
2-Butanone (MEK)
Carbon tetrachloride
Chlorobenzene
Chloroform
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
1,2-Dichloroethane
1,1-Dichloroethene
Tetrachloroethene
Trichloroethene
Vinyl chloride
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (S)
Toluene-d8 (S)
4-Bromofluorobenzene (S)
Dibromofluoromethane (S)
Date: 03/31 /200810:09 AM
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
2225 Riverside Dr.
Asheville, NC 28804
[phone]
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Lab ID: 9215810005 Collected: 03/19/08 16:10 Received: 03/20/08 09:30 Matrix: Water
Results Units Report Limit DF Prepared Analyzed CAS No. Qual
Analytical Method: EPA 8270 Preparation Method: EPA 3510
ND ug/L
50.0
1
03/26/08 00:00
03/27/08 08:47
106-46-7
ND ug/L
50.0
1
03/26/08 00:00
03/27/08 08:47
121-14-2
ND ug/L
50.0
1
03/26/08 00:00
03/27/08 08:47
87-68-3
ND ug/L
50.0
1
03/26/08 00:00
03/27/08 08:47
118-74-1
ND ug/L
50.0
1
03/26/08 00:00
03/27/08 08:47
67-72-1
ND ug/L
50.0
1
03/26/08 00:00
03/27/08 08:47
95-48-7
ND ug/L
50.0
1
03/26/08 00:00
03/27/08 08:47
ND ug/L
50.0
1
03/26/08 00:00
03/27/08 08:47
98-95-3
ND ug/L
50.0
1
03/26/08 00:00
03/27/08 08:47
87-86-5
ND_ug/L
50.0
1
03/26/08 00:00
03/27/08 08:47
110-86-1
ND ug/L
50.0
1
03/26/08 00:00
03/27/08 08:47
95-95-4
ND ug/L
50.0
1
03/26/08 00:00
03/27/08 08:47
88-06-2
69 %
30-150
1
03/26/08 00:00
03/27/08 08:47
4165-60-0
62 %
30-150
1
03/26/08 00:00
03/27/08 08:47
321-60-8
62 %
30-150
1
03/26/08 00:00
03/27/08 08:47
1718-51-0
23 %
30-150
1
03/26/08 00:00
03/27/08 08:47
13127-88-3 SO
34 %
30-150
1
03/26/08 00:00
03/27/08 08:47
367-12-4
67 %
30-150
1
03/26/08 00:00
03/27/08 08:47
118-79-6
Analytical Method: EPA 8260
ND ug/L
5.0
1
03/27/08 10:38
71-43-2
ND ug/L
10.0
1
03/27/08 10:38
78-93-3
ND ug/L
5.0
1
03/27/08 10:38
56-23-5
ND ug/L
5.0
1
03/27/08 10:38
108-90-7
ND ug/L
5.0
1
03/27/08 10:38
67-66-3
ND ug/L
5.0
1
03/27/08 10:38
106-46-7
ND ug/L
5.0
1
03/27/08 10:38
107-06-2
ND ug/L
5.0
1
03/2710810:38
75-35-4
ND ug/L
5.0
1
03/27/08 10:38
127-18-4
ND ug/L
5.0
1
03/27/08 10:38
79-01-6
ND ug/L
5.0
1
03/27/08 10:38
75-01-4
97 %
79-120
1
03/27/08 10:38
17060-07-0
99 %
70-120
1
03/27/08 10:38
2037-26-5
100 %
87-109
1
03/27/08 10:38
460-00-4
104 %
85-115
1
03/27/08 10:38
1868-53-7
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..
Page 7 of 15

ZaceAnalytical
www.pacelabs.com
i
1
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
2225 Riverside Dr.
Asheville, NC 28804
[phone]
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Project: Haywood County LF
Pace Project No.: 9215810
Sample: Haywood C&D Seep WT Lab ID: 9215810006 Collected: 03/19/08 16:20 Received: 03/20/08 09:30 Matrix: Water
Parameters Results Units Report Limit DF Prepared Analyzed CAS No. Qua[
8270 MSSV TCLP Sep Funnel
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
Hexachloro-1,3-butadiene
Hexachlorobenzene
Hexachloroethane
2-Methyl phe nol(o-Cresol)
3&4-Methylphenol (m&p Cresol)
Nitrobenzene
Pentachlorophenol
Pyridine
2, 4,5-Trich lorophenol
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
Nitrobenzene-d5 (S)
2-Fluorobiphenyl (S)
Terphenyl-d14 (S)
Phenol-d6 (S)
2-Fluorophenol (S)
2,4,6-Tribromophenol (S)
8260 MSV TCLP
Benzene
2-Butanone (MEK)
Carbon tetrachloride
Chlorobenzene
Chloroform
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
1,2-Dichloroethane
1,1-Dichloroethene
Tetrachloroethene
Trichloroethene
Vinyl chloride
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (S)
Toluene-d8 (S)
4-Bromofluorobenzene (S)
Dibromofluoromethane (S)
Date: 03/31 /200810:09 AM
Analytical Method: EPA 8270 Preparation Method: EPA 3510
ND ug/L
50.0
1
03/26/08 00:00 03/27/08 09:08
106-46-7
ND ug/L
50.0
1
03/26/08 00:00 03/27/08 09:08
121-14-2
ND ug/L
50.0
1
03/26/08 00:00 03/27/08 09:08
87-68-3
ND ug/L
50.0
1
03/26/08 00:00 03/27/08 09:08
118-74-1
ND ug/L
50.0
1
03/26/08 00:00 03/27/08 09:08
67-72-1
ND ug/L
50.0
1
03/26/08 00:00 03/27/08 09:08
95-48-7
ND ug/L
50.0
1
03/26/08 00:00 03/27/08 09:08
ND ug/L
50.0
1
03/26/08 00:00 03/27/08 09:08
98-95-3
ND ug/L
50.0
1
03/26/08 00:00 03/27/08 09:08
87-86-5
ND ug/L
50.0
1
03/26/08 00:00 03/27/08 09:08
110-86-1
ND ug/L
50.0
1
03/26/08 00:00 03/27/08 09:08
95-95-4
ND ug/L
50.0
1
03/26/08 00:00 03/27/08 09:08
88-06-2
74 %
30-150
1
03/26/08 00:00 03/27/08 09:08
4165-60-0
65 %
30-150
1
03/26/08 00:00 03/27/08 09:08
321-60-8
61 %
30-150
1
03/26/08 00:00 03/27/08 09:08
1718-51-0
23 %
30-150
1
03/26/08 00:00 03/27/08 09:08
13127-88-3 SO
35 %
30-150
1
03/26/08 00:00 03/27/08 09:08
367-12-4
69 %
30-150
1
03/26/08 00:00 03/27/08 09:08
118-79-6
Analytical Method: EPA 8260
ND ug/L
5.0
1
03/27/08 11:02
71-43-2
ND ug/L
10.0
1
03/27/08 11:02
78-93-3
ND ug/L
5.0
1
03/27/08 11:02
56-23-5
ND ug/L
5.0
1
03/27/08 11:02
108-90-7
ND ug/L
5.0
1
03/27/08 11:02
67-66-3
ND ug/L
5.0
1
03/27/08 11:02
106-46-7
ND ug/L
5.0
1
03/27/08 11:02
107-06-2
ND ug/L
5.0
1
03/27/08 11:02
75-35-4
ND ug/L
5.0
1
03/27/08 11:02
127-18-4
ND ug/L
5.0
1
03/27/08 11:02
79-01-6
ND ug/L
5.0
1
03/27/08 11:02
75-01-4
97 %
79-120
1
03/27/08 11:02
17060-07-0
99 %
70-120
1
03/27/08 11:02
2037-26-5
101 %
87-109
1
03/27/08 11:02
460-00-4
103 %
85-115
1
03/27/08 11:02
1868-53-7
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent
of �Pace
Analytical Services, Inc..
Page 8 of 15

aceAnalytical
www.pacelabs.com
i
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
2225 Riverside Dr.
Asheville, NC 28804
[phone]
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Project: Haywood County LF
Pace Project No.: 9215810
Sample: Haywood C&D Upstream
Lab ID: 9215810007 Collected: 03/19/08 15:44
Received: 03/20/08 09:30 Matrix: Water
WT
Parameters
Results Units
Report Limit
DF
Prepared
Analyzed
CAS No. Qual
8270 MSSV TCLP Sep Funnel
Analytical Method: EPA 8270
Preparation Method:
EPA 3510
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
ND ug/L
50.0
1
03/26/08 00:00
03/27/08 09:30
10646-7
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
ND ug/L
50.0
1
03/26/08 00:00
03/27/08 09:30
121-14-2
Hexachloro-1,3-butadiene
ND ug/L
50.0
1
03/26/08 00:00
03/27/08 09:30
87-68-3
Hexachlorobenzene
ND ug/L
50.0
1
03/26/08 00:00
03/27/08 09:30
118-74-1
Hexachloroethane
ND ug/L
50.0
1
03/26/08 00:00
03/27/08 09:30
67-72-1
2-Methylphenol(o-Cresol)
ND ug/L
50.0
1
03/26/08 00:00
03/27/08 09:30
95-48-7
3&4-Methylphenol (m&p Cresol)
ND ug/L
50.0
1
03/26/08 00:00
03/27/08 09:30
Nitrobenzene
ND ug/L
50.0
1
03/26/08 00:00
03/27/08 09:30
98-95-3
Pentachlorophenol
ND ug/L
50.0
1
03/26/08 00:00
03/27/08 09:30
87-86-5
Pyridine
ND ug/L
50.0
1
03/26/08 00:00
03/27/08 09:30
110-86-1
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
ND ug/L
50.0
1
03/26/08 00:00
03/27/08 09:30
95-95-4
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
ND ug/L
50.0
1
03/26/08 00:00
03/27/08 09:30
88-06-2
Nitrobenzene-d5 (S)
70 %
30-150
1
03/26/08 00:00
03/27/08 09:30
4165-60-0
2-Fluorobiphenyl (S)
64 %
30-150
1
03/26/08 00:00
03/27/08 09:30
321-60-8
Terphenyl-d14 (S)
65 %
30-150
1
03/26/08 00:00
03/27/08 09:30
1718-51-0
Phenol-d6 (S)
20 %
30-150
1
03/26/08 00:00
03/27/08 09:30
13127-88-3 SO
2-Fluorophenol (S)
32 %
30-150
1
03/26/08 00:00
03/27/08 09:30
367-12-4
2,4,6-Tdbromophenol (S)
65 %
30-150
1
03/26/08 00:00
03/27/08 09:30
118-79-6
8260 MSV TCLP
Analytical Method: EPA 8260
Benzene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
03/27/08 11:26
71-43-2
2-Butanone (MEK)
ND ug/L
10.0
1
03/27/08 11:26
78-93-3
Carbon tetrachloride
ND ug/L
5.0
1
03/27/08 11:26
56-23-5
Chlorobenzene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
03/27/08 11:26
108-90-7
Chloroform
ND ug/L
5.0
1
03/27/08 11:26
67-66-3
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
03/2710811:26
106-46-7
1,2-Dichloroethane
ND ug/L
5.0
1
03/27/08 11:26
107-06-2
1,1-Dichloroethene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
03127/0811:26
75-35-4
Tetrachloroethene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
03/27/08 11:26
127-18-4
Trichloroethene
ND ug/L
5.0
1
03/27/08 11:26
79-01-6
Vinyl chloride
ND ug/L
5.0
1
03/27/08 11:26
75-01-4
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (S)
97 %
79-120
1
03/27/08 11:26
17060-07-0
Toluene-d8 (S)
100 %
70-120
1
03/27/08 11:26
2037-26-5
4-Bromofluorobenzene (S)
100 %
87-109
1
03/27/08 11:26
460-00-4
Dibromofluoromethane (S)
101 %
85-115
1
03/27/08 11:26
1868-53-7
Date: 03/31 /200810:09 AM
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..
Page 9 of 15

aceAna1jdka1
www.pacelabs.com
Project: Haywood County LF
Pace Project No.: 9215810
Sample: Haywood C&D
Downstream WT
Parameters
8270 MSSV TCLP Sep Funnel
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
Hexachloro-1,3-butadiene
Hexachlorobenzene
Hexachloroethane
2-Methyl phenol(o-Cresol)
3&4-Methylphenol(m&p Cresol)
Nitrobenzene
Pentachlorophenol
Pyridine
2,4, 5-Trich lorophe nol
2,4,6-Tdchlorophenol
Nitrobenzene-d5 (S)
2-Fluorobiphenyl (S)
Terphenyl-d14 (S)
Phenol-d6 (S)
2-Fluorophenol (S)
2,4,6-Tribromophenol (S)
8260 MSV TCLP
Benzene
2-Butanone (MEK)
Carbon tetrachloride
Chlorobenzene
Chloroform
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
1,2-Dichloroethane
1,1-Dichloroethene
Tetrachloroethene
Trichloroethene
Vinyl chloride
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (S)
Toluene-d8 (S)
4-Bromofluorobenzene (S)
Dibromofluoromethane (S).
Date: 03/31/200810:09 AM
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
2225 Riverside Dr.
Asheville, NC 28804
[phone]
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9800 Kinsey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Lab ID: 9215810008 Collected: 03/19/08 16:45 Received: 03/20/08 09:30 Matrix: Water
Results Units Report Limit DF Prepared Analyzed CAS No. Qual
Analytical Method: EPA 8270 Preparation Method: EPA 3510
ND ug/L
50.0
1
03/26/08 00:00 03/27/08 09:52
106-46-7
ND ug/L
50.0
1
03/26/08 00:00 03/27/08 09:52
121-14-2
ND ug/L
50.0
1
03/26/08 00:00 03/27/08 09:52
87-68-3
ND ug/L
50.0
1
03/26/08 00:00 03/27/08 09:52
118-74-1
ND ug/L
50.0
1
03/26/08 00:00 03/27/08 09:52
67-72-1
ND ug/L
50.0
1
03/26/08 00:00 03/27/08 09:52
95-48-7
ND ug/L
50.0
1
03/26/08 00:00 03/27/08 09:52
ND ug/L
50.0
1
03/26/08 00:00 03/27/08 09:52
98-95-3
ND ug/L
50.0
1
03/26/08 00:00 03/27/08 09:52
87-86-5
ND ug/L
50.0
1
03/26/08 00:00 03/27/08 09:52
_ 110-86-1
ND ug/L
50.0
1
03/26/08 00:00 03/27/08 09:52
95-95-4
ND ug/L
50.0
1
03/26/08 00:00 03/27/08 09:52
88-06-2
71 %
30-150
1
03/26/08 00:00 03/27/08 09:52
4165-60-0
62 %
30-150
1
03/26/08 00:00 03/27/08 09:52
321-60-8
64 %
30-150
1
03/26/08 00:00 03/27/08 09:52
1718-51-0
22 %
30-150
1
03/26/08 00:00 03/27/08 09:52
13127-88-3 SO
33 %
30-150
1
03/26/08 00:00 03/27/08 09:52
367-12-4
67 %
30-150
1
03/26/08 00:00 03/27/08 09:52
118-79-6
Analytical Method: EPA 8260
ND ug/L
5.0
1
03/27/08 11:49
71-43-2
ND ug/L
10.0
1
03127/0811:49
78-93-3
ND ug/L
5.0
1
03/27/08 11:49
56-23-5
ND ug/L
5.0
1
03/27/08 11:49
108-90-7
ND ug/L
5.0
1
03/27/08 11:49
67-66-3
ND ug/L
5.0
1
03/27/08 11:49
106-46-7
ND ug/L
5.0
1
03/27/08 11:49
107-06-2
ND ug/L
5.0
1
03/27/08 11:49
75-35-4
ND ug/L
5.0
1
03/27/08 11:49
127-18-4
ND ug/L
5.0
1
03/27/08 11:49
79-01-6
ND ug/L
5.0
1
03/27/08 11:49
75-01-4
99 %
79-120
1
03/27/08 11:49
17060-07-0
98 %
70-120
1
03/27/08 11:49
2037-26-5
100 %
87-109
1
03/27/08 11:49
460-00-4
102 %
85-115
1
03/27/08 11:49
1868-53-7
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..
ie i
Page 10 of 15

ZaceAnalytical
www.pacetabs.com
1
i
Project: Haywood County LF
Pace Project No.: 9215810
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
2225 Riverside Dr.
Asheville, NC 28804
[phone]
QUALITY CONTROL DATA
QC Batch: MSV/2882 Analysis Method: EPA 8260
QC Batch Method: EPA 8260 Analysis Description: 8260 MSV TCLP
Associated Lab Samples: 9215810001, 9215810002, 9215810003, 9215810004
METHOD BLANK: 91847
Associated Lab Samples:
9215810001, 9215810002, 9215810003, 9215810004
Blank
Reporting
Parameter
Units
Result
Limit Qualifiers
1,1-Dichloroethene
ug/L
ND
5.0
1,2-Dichloroethane
ug/L
ND
5.0
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
ug/L
ND
5.0
2-Butanone (MEK)
ug/L
ND
10.0
Benzene
ug/L
ND
5.0
Carbon tetrachloride
ug/L
ND
5.0
Chlorobenzene
ug/L
ND
5.0
Chloroform
ug/L
ND
5.0
Tetrachloroethene
ug/L
ND
5.0
Trichloroethene
ug/L
ND
5.0
Vinyl chloride
ug/L
ND
5.0
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (S)
%
109
79-120
4-Bromofluorobenzene (S)
%
101
87-109
Dibromofluoromethane (S)
%
101
85-115
Toluene-d8 (S)
%
101
70-120
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9800 KinceyAve. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE:
Parameter
91848
Units
Spike
Conc.
LCS
Result
LCS
% Rec
% Rec
Limits Qualifiers
1,1-Dichloroethene
ug/L
50
65.3
131
78-146
1,2-Dichloroethane
ug/L
50
60.9
122
72-126
1,4-Dichlorbbenzene
ug/L
50
47.1
94
79-125
2-Butanone (MEK)
ug/L
100
118
118
50-134
Benzene
ug/L
50
55.6
111
78-128
Carbon tetrachloride
ug/L
50
72.9
146
81-137 L3
Chlorobenzene
ug/L
50
55.2
110
82-126
Chloroform
ug/L
50
61.2
122
77-129
Tetrachloroethene
ug/L
50
52.5
105
78-128
Trichloroethene
ug/L
50
58.5
117
79-127
Vinyl chloride
ug/L
50
51.2
102
67-143
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (S)
%
105
79-120
4-Bromofluorobenzene (S)
%
104
87-109
Dibromofluoromethane (S)
%
99
85-115
Toluene-d8 (S)
%
99
70-120
Date: 03/31/2008 10:09 AM REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS Page 11 of 15
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..

aceAnalytical
www.pacelabs.com
Project: Haywood County LF
Pace Project No.: 9215810
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
2225 Riverside Dr.
Asheville, NC 28804
[phone]
QUALITY CONTROL DATA
QC Batch: OEXT/2743 Analysis Method: EPA 8270
QC Batch Method: EPA 3510 Analysis Description: 8270 TCLP MSSV
Associated Lab Samples: 9215810005, 9215810006, 9215810007, 9215810008
METHOD BLANK: 93314
Associated Lab Samples:
9215810005,9215810006,9215810007,9215810008
Blank Reporting
Parameter Units Result Limit
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
2,4,5-Trchlorophenol
2, 4, 6-Trich I orophe n o l
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
2-Methylphenol(o-Cresol)
3&4-Methylphenol (m&p Cresol)
Hexachloro-1,3-butadiene
Hexachlorobenzene
Hexachloroethane
Nitrobenzene
Pentachlorophenol
Pyridine
2,4,6-Tribromophenol (S)
2-Fluorobiphenyl (S)
2-Fluorophenol (S)
Nitrobenzene-d5 (S)
Phenol-d6 (S)
Terphenyl-d14 (S)
ug/L
ND
50.0
ug/L
ND
50.0
ug/L
ND
50.0
ug/L
ND
50.0
ug/L
ND
50.0
ug/L
ND
50.0
ug/L
ND
50.0
ug/L
ND
50.0
ug/L
ND
50.0
ug/L
ND
50.0
ug/L
ND
50.0
ug/L
ND
50.0
%
67
30-150
%
66
30-150
%
33
30-150
%
73
30-150
%
21
30-150 SO
%
71
30-150
Qualifiers
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9800 Kinsey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE & LCSD: 93315
Parameter Units
Spike
Conc.
93316
LCS LCSD
Result Result
LCS LCSD
% Rec % Rec
% Rec
Limits
RPD
Max
RPD Qualifiers
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
ug/L
500
206
246
41
49
30-150
18
30
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
ug/L
500
302
373
60
75
30-150
21
30
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
ug/L
500
267
312
53
62
30-150
15
30
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
ug/L
500
325
392
65
78
30-150
19
30
2-Methylphenol(o-Cresol)
ug/L
500
245
299
49
60
30-150
20
30
3&4-Methylphenol(m&p Cresol)
ug/L
500
214
262
43
52
30-150
20
30
Hexachloro-1,3-butadiene
ug/L
500
171
192
34
38
30-150
11
30
Hexachlorobenzene
ug/L
500
304
357
61
71
30-150
16
30
Hexachloroethane
ug/L
500
192
234
38
47
30-150
20
30
Nitrobenzene
ug/L
500
253
292
51
58
30-150
14
30
Pentachlorophenol
ug/L
500
303
404
61
81
30-150
29
30
Pyridine
ug/L
500
162
203
32
41
30-150
22
30
2,4,6-Tribromophenol (S)
%
70
86
30-150
2-Fluorobiphenyl (S)
%
56
64
30-150
2-Fluorophenol (S)
%
31
34
30-150
Nitrobenzene-d5 (S)
%
54
64
30-150
Phenol-d6 (S)
%
20
26
30-150
SO
Terphenyl-d14 (S)
%
63
76
30-150
Date: 03/31/2008 10:09 AM REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..
PPc_l go*ryc
Page 12 of 15

aceAnalytical
www.pacelabs.com
Project: Haywood County LF
Pace Project No.: 9215810
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
2225 Riverside Dr.
Asheville, NC 28804
[phone]
QUALITY CONTROL DATA
QC Batch: MSV/2942 Analysis Method: EPA 8260
QC Batch Method: EPA 8260 Analysis Description: 8260 MSV TCLP
Associated Lab Samples: 9215810005, 9215810006, 9215810007, 9215810008
METHOD BLANK: 93551
Associated Lab Samples:
Parameter
9215810005, 9215810006, 9215810007, 9215810008
Blank Reporting
Units Result Limit
1,1-Dichloroethene
ug/L
ND
5.0
1,2-Dichloroethane
ug/L
ND
5.0
1,4-DichIorobenzene
ug/L
ND
5.0
2-Butanone (MEK)
ug/L
ND
10.0
Benzene
ug/L
ND
5.0
Carbon tetrachloride
ug/L
ND
5.0
Chlorobenzene
ug/L
ND
5.0
Chloroform
ug/L
ND
5.0
Tetrachloroethene
ug/L
ND
5.0
Trichloroethene
ug/L
ND
5.0
Vinyl chloride
ug/L
ND
5.0
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (S)
%
89
79-120
4-Bromofluorobenzene (S)
%
99
87-109
Dibromofluoromethane (S)
%
101
85-115
Toluene-d8 (S)
%
99
70-120
LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE:
Parameter
93552
Units
Spike
Conc.
LCS
Result
1,1-Dichloroethene
ug/L
50
69.7
1,2-Dichloroethane
ug/L
50
57.2
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
ug/L
50
55.3
2-Butanone (MEK)
ug/L
100
135
Benzene
ug/L
50
58.6
Carbon tetrachloride
ug/L
50
59.1
Chlorobenzene
ug/L
50
58.2
Chloroform
ug/L
50
57.5
Tetrachloroethene
ug/L
50
56.9
Trichloroethene
ug/L
50
58.1
Vinyl chloride
ug/L
50
51.4
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (S)
%
4-Bromofluorobenzene (S)
%
Dibromofluoromethane (S)
%
Toluene-d8 (S)
%
Date: 03/31 /200810:09 AM
Qualifiers
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
LCS
% Rec
% Rec
Limits Qualifiers
139
78-146
114
72-126
111
79-125
135
50-134 L3
117
78-128
118
81-137
116
82-126
115
77-129
114
78-128
116
79-127
103
67-143
95
79-120
101
87-109
92
85-115
100
70-120
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace
Analytical Services, Inc..
Page 13 of 15

aceAnalytical
wmpacelabscom
Project: Haywood County LF
Pace Project No.: 9215810
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
2225 Riverside Dr.
Asheville, NC 28804
[phone]
QUALITY CONTROL DATA
QC Batch: OEXT/2749 Analysis Method: EPA 8270
QC Batch Method: EPA 3510 Analysis Description: 8270 TCLP MSSV
Associated Lab Samples: 9215810001, 9215810002, 9215810003, 9215810004
METHOD BLANK: 93628
Associated Lab Samples: 9215810001, 9215810002, 9215810003, 9215810004
Blank Reporting
Parameter Units Result Limit Qualifiers
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
ug/L
ND
50.0
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
ug/L
ND
50.0
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
ug/L
ND
50.0
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
ug/L
ND
50.0
2-Methylphenol(o-Cresol)
ug/L
ND
50.0
3&4-Methylphenol (m&p Cresol)
ug/L
ND
50.0
Hexachloro-1,3-butadiene
ug/L
ND
50.0
Hexachlorobenzene
ug/L
ND
50.0
Hexachloroethane
ug/L
ND
50.0
Nitrobenzene
ug/L
ND
50.0
Pentachlorophenol
ug/L
ND
50.0
Pyridine
ug/L
ND
50.0
2,4,6-Tribromophenol (S)
%
67
30-150
2-Fluorobiphenyl (S)
%
66
30-150
2-Fluorophenol (S)
%
33
30-150
Nitrobenzene-d5 (S)
%
73
30-150
Phenol-d6 (S)
%
21
30-150 SO
Terphenyl-d14 (S)
%
71
30-150
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE & LCSD: 93629
Parameter Units
Spike
Conc.
93630
LCS LCSD
Result Result
LCS LCSD
% Rec % Rec
% Rec
Limits
RPD
Max
RPD Qualifiers
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
ug/L
500
206
246
41
49
30-150
18
30
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
ug/L
500
302
373
60
75
30-150
21
30
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
ug/L
500
267
312
53
62
30-150
15
30
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
ug/L
500
325
392
65
78
30-150
19
30
2-Methylphenol(o-Cresol)
ug/L
500
245
299
49
60
30-150
20
30
3&4-Methylphenol (m&p Cresol)
ug/L
500
214
262
43
52
30-150
20
30
Hexachloro-1,3-butadiene
ug/L
500
171
192
34
38
30-150
11
30
Hexachlorobenzene
ug/L
500
304
357
61
71
30-150
16
30
Hexachloroethane
ug/L
500
192
234
38
47
30-150
20
30
Nitrobenzene
ug/L
500
253
292
51
58
30-150
14
30
Pentachlorophenol
ug/L
500
303
404
61
81
30-150
29
30
Pyridine
ug/L
500
162
203
32
41
30-150
22
30
2,4,6-Tribromophenol (S)
%
70
86
30-150
2-Fluorobiphenyl (S)
%
56
64
30-150
2-Fluorophenol (S)
%
31
34
30-150
Nitrobenzene-d5 (S)
%
54
64
30-150
Phenol-d6 (S)
%
20
26
30-150
SO
Terphenyl-d14 (S)
%
63
76
30-150
Date: 03/31/200810:09 AM REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS Page 14 of 15
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..
o C_

aceAnalytical
www.pacelabs.com
t
i
QUALIFIERS
Project: Haywood County LF
Pace Project No.: 9215810
DEFINITIONS
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
2225 Riverside Dr.
Asheville, NC 28804
[phone]
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
DF - Dilution Factor, if reported, represents the factor applied to the reported data due to changes in sample preparation, dilution of
the sample aliquot, or moisture content.
ND - Not Detected at or above adjusted reporting limit.
J - Estimated concentration above the adjusted method detection limit and below the adjusted reporting limit.
MDL -Adjusted Method Detection Limit.
S - Surrogate
1,2-Diphenylhydrazine (8270 listed analyte) decomposes to Azobenzene.
Consistent with EPA guidelines, unrounded data are displayed and have been used to calculate % recovery and RPD values.
LCS(D) - Laboratory Control Sample (Duplicate)
MS(D) - Matrix Spike (Duplicate)
DUP - Sample Duplicate
RPD - Relative Percent Difference
NC - Not Calculable.
Pace Analytical is NELAP accredited. Contact your Pace PM for the current list of accredited analytes.
ANALYTE QUALIFIERS
L3 Analyte recovery in the laboratory control sample (LCS) exceeded QC limits. Analyte presence below reporting limits in
associated samples. Results unaffected by high bias.
SO Surrogate recovery outside laboratory control limits.
S5 Surrogate recovery outside control limits due to matrix interferences (not confirmed by re -analysis).
Date: 03/31/200810:09 AM REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS Page 15 of 15
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..
,H accpgp

PWA
A74,11A
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Dexter R. Matthews, Director Division of Waste Management Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
Document ID No. 4316
SOLID WASTE SECTION
April 4, 2008
Mr. Stephen King
Solid Waste Director — Haywood County
278 Recycle Road
Clyde, North Carolina 28721
Subject: Response to questions from meeting on 4/1/08
Haywood County Waste Management Facilities
Haywood County, Permit #44-03 and #44-07
Dear Mr. King:
It was a pleasure meeting with you and Mr. Shumpert at the Haywood County Construction and Demolition
(C&D) Debris Landfill on April 1, 2008. During this meeting several topics were discussed that could affect
compliance and permitting of the C&D unit and the closed facility. Each of these topics will be discussed
individually below for clarity.
1) There were trenches dug in two locations to contain leachate breakout from the C&D unit. You
inquired about the use of mulch to refill these trenches prior to the addition of cover material. Your
motivation behind the use of mulch was availability and the porosity it would provide allowing for
some leachate storage. This storage volume would increase the =4 and time available for leachate
infiltration into the landfill. Your reasoning is sound; however, the choice of material is not ideal. As
we discussed, the mulch will degrade over time and subside creating integrity problems with the
landfill cap. We would recommend using substantial construction and demolition debris such as
concrete, brick or block. These materials should be readily available and provide porosity without
endangering the cap integrity over time.
2) One of the aforementioned leachate breakout areas was located directly beside a drainage ditch. This
ditch does not terminate in a sediment basin. The suggestion was made to expand the existing
sediment basin in order to reduce the risk of leachate leaving the landfill area and entering the nearby
stream. There is nothing in the solid waste rules or the permit to prevent you from expanding the
sediment basin. However, all erosion and sediment control measures are subject to North Carolina
Administrative Code Title 15A Chapter 4 rules. Therefore, I would recommend contacting Janet
2090 US Highway 70, Swannanoa, North Carolina 28778
Phone [phone] FAX [phone] Internet http://wastenotnc.org
An Equal Opportunity / Affirmative Action Employer— Printed on Dual Purpose Recycled Paper

Page 2
Haywood County
4/4/08
Boyer, Land Quality Regional Engineer, to discuss this change and get approval. In addition, there
would be no permit modification fee for this facility change.
3) There is a proposed project to add photovoltaic panels on top of the closed Francis Farm Municipal
Solid Waste Landfill (MSW). Based on the discussion and the photographs provided, the project
seems promising and viable. However, as we discussed, the project can in no way jeopardize the
integrity of the landfill cap. An application should be submitted to the state for review providing all of
the details for the project and demonstrating how the project meets all of the requirements in the North
Carolina General Statutes and Administrative Code. This project would require a permit modification
fee along with the submission of the application.
Should you have any questions regarding this matter please contact me at [phone].
Sincerely,
Allen Gaither
Environmental Engineer
Cc: Dave Pasko — McGill Associates, 55 Broad Street, Asheville, NC 28801
Deb Aja — DWM/SWS/ARO
Troy Harrison — DWM/SWS/ARO

Haywood County Department of Solid Waste
Management
278 Recycle Road, Clyde, North Carolina 28734, Ph.: [phone], Fax: [phone]
October 31, 2008
Ms. Andrea Keller, Waste Management Specialist
Solid Waste Section
Division of Waste Management
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
2090 U.S. Highway 70
Swannanoa, North Carolina 28778
Re: Request for Demonstration Period for Mulch/Soil Material as an Alternate Daily Cover
Haywood County White Oak MSW Landfill, Permit # 44-07
Dear Ms. Keller,
The Haywood County Department of Solid Waste Management is formally requesting the use of
an Alternate Daily Cover (ADC) at the White Oak Landfill. The Department proposes a 180 day
demonstration period, during which. Field Specialists with the Solid Waste Section will be able to
verify the ADC's effectiveness in meeting the requirements of Rules .1626(2)(a) and (b).
The proposed ADC will consist of six inches of a mixture of soil and mulch material such that a
proportion of 3:1, soil to mulch, will be used in place of six inches of cover soil materials. The
County will use the mulched material on an availability basis primarily in wet landfill access
areas. The mulched material will be generated on site at the proposed grinding and mulching
treatment and processing facility, which is currently under permit review by the Permitting
Branch_ of the Solid Waste Section of the North Carolina Department of Environment and
Natural Resources. All operations of the treatment facility will be in accordance with Section
.0300 of the Solid Waste Rules, as described in the Mulching and Grinding Treatment and
Processing Operations Plan submitted to the Permitting Branch. The ADC mulch will be applied
to the landfill as described below. The County would like to begin the ADC demonstration
period as soon as possible. This demonstration period will offer the County the opportunity to
review grinding and mulching treatment and processing procedures as well as ADC mulch
application procedures prior to finalizing the Operations Plan for each.

Operations Plan -,ADC Mulched Material
At the discretion of the landfill operator, in place of six inches of cover soil materials, by the end
of each day of operations, the horizontal or lateral expansion of the working face will be covered
with at least six inches of a mixture of mulched material and cover soil materials. The
mulch/soil mixture will consist of a ratio of 1: 3, mulched material to soil. Mulched material will
be transported to the landfill and stockpiled in an area out of the way of current operations and
access. Three stockpiles of dirt equal to the size of the mulch stockpile will be placed with the
mulch_ An excavator or bulldozer will be used to mix the soil and mulch materials by rolling the
material together as it covers_
Thank you for your time and consideration of this request. Please contact me at your
convenience should you need any additional infonnation or have any additional requirements of
this department with regards to the request. r look forward to your response.
Sincerely,
µ Stephen Ting
Director of Solid Waste Management, Haywood County
cc: David Cotton, Haywood County Manager
Jeff l3ishop, McGill Associates
Allen Gaither, Regional Engineer, NCDENR

t F:'
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCE5
FACILITY COMPLIANCE AUDIT REPORT
Division of Waste Management
Solid Waste Section
UNIT TYPE: (check'all that a
ply to this audit with same Permit number)
Lined
X
LCID
YW
Transfer
Compost
SLAS
COUNTY: Haywood
MSWLF
PERMIT NO.: 44-07
Closed
xxw
white
Incin
T&P
FIRM
MSWLF
goods
FILE TYPE: COMPLIANCE
CDLF
TireT&P/
Tire
Industrial
DEMO
SDTF
Collection
Monofill
Landfill
Date of Audit: 09/29/08 Date of Last Audit: 02/07/08
FACILITY NAME AND ADDRESS:
Haywood County Municipal Solid Waste Landfill
State Road 1338, White Oak Community
Waynesville, N. C. 28786
GPS COORDINATES: (Decimal Degrees) N: 35.66343 W:-82.99866
FACILITY CONTACT NAME AND PHONE NUMBER:
Stephen King, Haywood County Solid Waste Director
Telephone [phone]
FACILITY CONTACT ADDRESS (IF DIFFERENT):
Stephen King, Director
Haywood County Solid Waste Department
278 Recycle Drive
Clyde, N. C. 28721
AUDIT PARTICIPANTS:
Andrea Keller, NCDENR, Division of Waste Management (DWM), Solid Waste Section (SWS)
Stephen King, Haywood County Solid Waste Director
Jeffery Bishop, Senior Project Manager, McGill Associates
STATUS OF PERMIT:
Active- Permit to Operate issued November 8, 2006
PURPOSE OF AUDIT:
Partial audit of Municipal solid waste landfill
NOTICE OF VIOLATIONS) (citation and explanation):
NONE
You are hereby advised that, pursuant to N.C.G.S. 130A-22, an administrative penalty of up to $5,000 per day may be assessed for each
violation of the Solid Waste Statute or Regulations. If the violation(s) noted here continue, you may be subject to enforcement actions
including penalties, injunction from operation of a solid waste management facility or a solid waste collection service and any such further
relief as may be necessary to achieve compliance with the North Carolina Solid Waste Management Act and Rules.
STATUS OF PAST NOTED VIOLATIONS (List all noted last audit):
N/A

FACILITY COMPLIANCE AUDIT REPORT
Division of Waste Management
Solid Waste Section
Page 2 of 2
AREAS OF CONCERN AND COMMENTS:
1. The NCDENR/DWM/SWS was notified on 9/26/08 of leachate seep and repair activities at the MSWLF.
The letter document from McGill Associates indicated the seepage was noted on 9/22/08 and that the
location of the seep with respect to the edge of liner was verified on 9/23/08.
2. McGill Associates proposed "installing a trench type drain for the conveyance of leachate away from the
apparent seep area [and] toward the MSW Phase 1 sump area, a distance of approximately 40 feet."
3. Additional corrective actions stated in the letter indicated that landfill personnel will continue to monitor the
area and that the annual cleaning of the leachate system piping/sump area will be scheduled for the month of
October, 2008.
4. During the onsite audit, two areas/pits had been excavated within the liner system in order to lay the trench
(per McGill letter, Figure 3). Survey stakes were visible and had been used as vertical guidance during the
excavation (to stay above the liner system by a minimum of 4 feet). Additionally, the edge -of -liner stakes
were visible and a clean soil berm had been placed along this edge to both protect the edge of liner area, and
to block any leachate release during the excavation activities.
5. This area of excavation started inside the dirt berm within the line system, located approximately 29 yards
from the power pole on the edge of the roadway and above the leachate pond, and extended into the MSW to
approximately 43 yards from the power pole. The upper trench was approximately 35'xl5'xl2-15' deep.
The lower trench, which had visible leachate pooling during the onsite visit (was being observed for proper
drainage), was approximately 20'xl5'x5'. No leachate was observed outside the trench. The location of the
visible seepage was originally located between these two trenches, at a GPS coordinate location (degrees) of
N 35.66699, W-83.00031.
6. According to J. Bishop and S. King, no seepage occurred outside the edge of liner system, all leachate was
contained within the liner during repair activities, and all additionally generated leachate from the
construction activities was pumped directly into the sump piping system which gravity feeds to the leachate
collection pond.
7. It was discussed during the site audit that in the future, any similar situations should be communicated
directly to the compliance branch of the SWS (rather than the permitting branch) and with more expediency
in order to allow for visual confirmation of any existing site conditions.
8. Additionally, it was noted to S. King that the southern side of the MSW active working face, while seeded
and with adequate ground cover, was exhibiting erosion conditions which required repair/attention. Erosion
gullies were observed in multiple locations, with depths of approximately 8-12 inches.
Please contact me if you have any questions or concerns regarding this audit report.
_Andrea Keller Phone: [phone]
Rezio resentata e
Delivered on : 9/29/08 by hand delivery US Mail ified No. Lj

OUNTAIN
Environmental Group
August 14, 2008
environmental consulting • assessment • remediation • waste management
Mr. Ervin Lane
Compliance Hydrogeologist
Solid Waste Section
Division of Waste Management
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural. Resources
410 Oberlin Road, Suite 150
1646 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1646
Re; Response to Compliance Order
Proposed Soil, Groundwater and Surface Water Sampling Locations
C&D Phase 1, Permit Number44-07
White Oak MSW Landfill
Haywood County, North Carolina
Dear Mr. Lane,
As you are aware, Mountain Environmental Group (MEG) conducted leachate and water
sampling activities at the C&D Phase 1 area of White Oak Landfill on March 20, 2008 This was
in response to leachate seeps observed on March 19 and 20, 2008. Containment holes were
excavated to address the seeps and leachate did not migrate beyond the permitted limits.
In an ongoing effort to ensure that leachate does not impact downgradient surface water or
groundwater, MEG on behalf of White Oak Landfill, proposes to additional soil and water
sampling. As discussed in our telephone conversation on August 13, 2008, sampling locations
will be those shown on the attached map.
Sampling activities will consist of four soil samples (one background and three from leachate-
impacted areas) and four water samples (one surface water and three from existing monitoring
wells). As discussed, additional groundwater monitoring may be required depending upon soil
sampling results. All samples will be analyzed for Appendix II VOCs (Method 8260) and SVOCs
(Method 8270) and RCRA metals (Methods 6010/7471 and 6010/7470).
If you have any questions or require assistance, please do not hesitate to contact me at 828-
648-5556.
Sincerely,
Justi `Judd' Mahan, PG
Project Manager
1560 Pisgah Drive PHONE. [phone]
Canton, NC 28716 [phone]
www.mountainenvironmental.com W. [phone]

j' �` � \ � 11 I. -i I 1 VV \` \V 11, tll � IV I I I � �\ �---- �,_ ---�- f�\✓/
Proposed sampling locations below will ber
sampled and analyzed for the following -
`�+ \ , TCLP volatiles and semi-volatilesand ---�'1 f + ` _-
�`\\ metals.
___Proposed soil
sample SS-1 t
A), Proposed soil
��, \ \`• sample - -
\, Bac
` a
Proposed soil
sample SS-2
� � o
a �
a —a
nd
5 O !` j o Proposed soil
sample SS-3
(� = MAP OF OBSERVED
.a LEACHATE 3/19108
-- --- Existing MW-15. _
Proposed water
sa
��M Piezometer P-9.
Proposed water Ne
Ne
sample.
C Existing well CC
'� `;Proposed water
---- ' sample.
INN
d
-------- -
j
Proposed surface
water sampling -
---" location. Previously
sampled.
WHITE OAK MSW LANDFILL) �Omcu
HAYWOOD COUNTY AS s o CIA
HAYWOOD COUNTY. NORTH CAROLINA EnxowoNs6rniml Ns ...ma. n 21-1O re.I