The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About16017_Carolina Medical Electronics_EMP Final_2021Jul07#C-1269 Engineering #C-245 Geology Environmental Management Plan Carolina Medical Electronics Brownfields Project No. 16017-12-085 157 Industrial Drive King, North Carolina H&H Job No. DMM-001 Revised July 6, 2021 CONTENTS Completed EMP Template Form Figures Figure 1 Site Location Map Figure 2 Redevelopment Plan with Sampling Locations Appendices Appendix A Redevelopment Plan Appendix B Grading Plan and Cut-Fill Analysis Appendix C Historical Report Excerpts Appendix D Grading Plan for Soil Borrow Source Appendix E Historic Aerial Photographs for Soil Borrow Source 1 EMP Version 2, January 2021 NORTH CAROLINA BROWNFIELDS PROGRAM ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN This form is to be used to prepare an Environmental Management Plan (EMP) for projects in the North Carolina Brownfields Program at the direction of a Brownfields project manager. The EMP is a typical requirement of a Brownfields Agreement (BFA). Its purpose is to clarify actions to be taken during the demolition and construction at Brownfields properties in an effort to avoid delays in the event of the discovery of new contamination sources or other environmental conditions. The EMP provides a means to document redevelopment plans and environmental data for each applicable environmental medium to inform regulatory-compliant decision-making at the site. As much detail as possible should be included in the EMP, including contingency planning for unknowns. Consult your project manager if you have questions. Prospective Developers and/or their consultants must complete and submit this form and all pertinent attachments, see checklist below, to their Brownfields project manager prior to any earthmoving or other development-related activities that have the potential to disturb soil at the Brownfields Property, including demolition. For the resultant EMP to be valid for use, it must be completed, reviewed by the program, signed by all parties working on the project, and approved by the Brownfields project manager. Failure to comply with the requirements of the EMP could jeopardize project eligibility, or in the event of a completed agreement, be cause for a reopener. The EMP is valid only for the scope of work described herein and must be updated to be applicable for new phases of redevelopment or after significant changes in applicable regulatory guidance. Voluntary Metrics Tab The NC Brownfields Program updates estimated capital investment (from the Brownfields Property Application) and estimated jobs created (from the Brownfields Agreement) whenever possible. As a voluntary measure, you may opt to complete the below information for capital investment and jobs created as estimated by your final redevelopment plans for the Brownfields Property: 1. Estimated capital investment in redevelopment project: Approximately $3,500,000 (building only) 2. Estimated jobs created: a. Construction Jobs: 150 b. Full Time Post-Redevelopment Jobs: 35 2 EMP Version 2, January 2021 Table of Contents NORTH CAROLINA BROWNFIELDS PROGRAM ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN ........................... 1 GENERAL INFORMATION ........................................................................................................................ 4 COMMUNICATIONS ................................................................................................................................ 4 NOTIFICATIONS TO THE BROWNFIELDS PROGRAM ............................................................................... 5 REDEVELOPMENT PLANS ........................................................................................................................ 5 CONTAMINATED MEDIA ......................................................................................................................... 7 PART 1. Soil ......................................................................................................................................... 7 PART 2. GROUNDWATER ................................................................................................................. 19 PART 3. SURFACE WATER .................................................................................................................. 20 PART 4. SEDIMENT ............................................................................................................................ 21 PART 5. SOIL VAPOR ......................................................................................................................... 21 PART 6. SUB-SLAB SOIL VAPOR ........................................................................................................ 22 PART 7. INDOOR AIR ......................................................................................................................... 23 VAPOR INTRUSION MITIGATION SYSTEM ............................................................................................. 23 CONTINGENCY PLAN – encountering unknown tanks, drums, or other waste materials ..................... 24 POST-REDEVELOPMENT REPORTING..................................................................................................... 26 APPROVAL SIGNATURES ....................................................................................................................... 28 3 EMP Version 2, January 2021 So that the EMP provides value in protecting brownfields eligibility and public health, the preparer shall ensure that the following steps have been completed prior to submitting the EMP for review. Any EMP prepared without completing these steps is premature. ☒ Site sampling and assessment that meets Brownfields’ objectives is complete and has been reviewed and approved by the Brownfields Project Manager. ☒ Specific redevelopment plans, even if conceptual, have been developed for the project, submitted and reviewed by the Brownfields Project Manager. Please submit, along with the completed EMP form, the following attachments, as relevant and applicable to the proposed redevelopment: ☒ A set of redevelopment plans, including architectural/engineering plans, if available; if not conceptual plans may suffice if updated when detailed plans are drafted. ☒ A figure overlaying redevelopment plans on a map of the extent of contamination for each media. ☒ Site grading plans that include a cut and fill analysis. ☐ A figure showing the proposed location and depth of impacted soil that would remain on site after construction grading. ☐ Any necessary permits for redevelopment (i.e. demolition, etc.). ☒ A detailed construction schedule that includes timing and phases of construction. ☒ Tabulated data summaries for each impacted media (i.e. soil, groundwater, soil gas, etc.) applicable to the proposed redevelopment. ☒ Figures with the sampling locations and contamination extents for each impacted media applicable to the proposed redevelopment. ☒ A full final grade sampling and analysis plan, if the redevelopment plan is final. ☒ If known, information about each proposed potential borrow soil source, such as aerial photos, historic site maps, historic Sanborn maps, a site history, necessary for brownfields approval. ☐ Information and, analytical data if required, for quarries, or other borrow sources, detailing the type of material proposed for importation to the Brownfields Property. 4 EMP Version 2, January 2021 ☐ A work plan for the sampling and analysis of soil to be brought onto the Brownfields Property. Refer to Issue Resolution 15 in Brownfields Program Guidelines. ☐ A map of the Brownfields Property showing the location of soils proposed for export and sampling data from those areas. ☒ If a Vapor Mitigation System is required by the Brownfields Program, the Vapor Intrusion Mitigation System (VIMS) plan will be signed and sealed by a NC Professional Engineer. The VIMS Plan may also be submitted under separate cover. GENERAL INFORMATION Date: 1/29/2021 Revision Date (if applicable): 7/6/2021 Brownfields Assigned Project Name: Carolina Medical Electronics Brownfields Project Number: 16017-12-085 Brownfields Property Address: 157 Industrial Drive, King, NC (Figure 2) Brownfields Property Area (acres): 6.24 acres Is Brownfields Property Subject to RCRA Permit?.......................☐ Yes ☒ No If yes enter Permit No.: Is Brownfields Property Subject to a Solid Waste Permit….……..☐ Yes ☒ No If yes, enter Permit No.: COMMUNICATIONS A copy of this EMP shall be distributed to all the parties below as well as any contractors or site workers that may be exposed to site vapors, soil, groundwater, and/or surface water. Additionally, a copy of the EMP shall be maintained at the Brownfields Property during redevelopment activities. NOTE, THE EMP DOES NOT TAKE THE PLACE OF A SITE-SPECIFIC HEALTH AND SAFETY PLAN. Prospective Developer (PD): Dynamic Real Estate Development, LLC (DRED) Contact Person: Joseph H. Landry/ President Phone Numbers: Office: (336) 362-2884 Mobile: Email: joe.landry@dmxm.com Contractor for PD: Triad Builders of King, NC Contact Person: James Smith Phone Numbers: Office: (336) 983-9400 x104 Mobile: (336) 978-6456 Email: jsmith@triadbuilders.com 5 EMP Version 2, January 2021 Environmental Consultant: Hart & Hickman, PC Contact Person: Mr. Justin Ballard Phone Numbers: Office: (919) 847-4241 Mobile: (252) 548-9191 Email: jballard@harthickman.com Brownfields Program Project Manager: Mr. David Peacock Phone Numbers: Office: (910) 796-7401 Mobile: (919) 280-3408 Email: david.peacock@ncdenr.gov Other DEQ Program Contacts (if applicable, i.e., UST Section, Inactive Hazardous Site Branch, Hazardous Waste, Solid Waste): Ms. Jordan Thompson; jordan.thompson@ncdenr.gov; (704) 223-6549 NOTIFICATIONS TO THE BROWNFIELDS PROGRAM Written advance Notification Times to Brownfields Project Manager: Check each box to accept minimum advance notice periods (in calendar days) for each type of onsite task: On-site assessment or remedial activities:……………………………………….…… 10 days Prior ☒ Construction or grading start:……………………………………….………………………. 10 days Prior ☒ Discovery of stained soil, odors, USTs, buried drums or waste, landfill, or other signs of previously unknown contamination: ……………………………….……………………………………. Within 48 hours ☒ Implementation of emergency actions (e.g. dewatering, flood or soil erosion control measures in area of contamination, ventilation of work zones):…………….……….……… Within 48 hours ☒ Installation of mitigation systems:………………………….………………….……….. 10 days Prior ☒ Other notifications as required by local, state or federal agencies to implement redevelopment activities: (as applicable): ……………………….…………………………………………..… Within 30 days ☒ REDEVELOPMENT PLANS 1) Type of Redevelopment (check all that apply): ☐Residential ☐Recreational ☐Institutional ☐Commercial ☒Office ☐Retail ☒Industrial ☒Other specify: Parking 2) Check the following activities that will be conducted prior to commencing earth-moving activities 6 EMP Version 2, January 2021 at the site: ☐ Review of historic maps (Sanborn Maps, facility maps) ☐ Conducting geophysical surveys to evaluate the location of suspect UST, fuel lines, utility lines, etc. ☒ Interviews with employees/former employees/facility managers/neighbors 3) Summary of Redevelopment Plans (MANDATORY: attach detailed plans or conceptual plans, if detailed plans are not available. EMP review without such information would be premature): Provide brief summary of redevelopment plans, including demolition, removal of building slabs/pavement, grading plans and planned construction of new structures: Proposed redevelopment plans for the Brownfields property include construction of an approximately 35,000 square foot (sq ft) industrial building with office space (Figure 3). Remaining portions of the Site will be improved with utilities, parking, and asphalt access drives. As part of grading activities, existing asphalt and concrete surfaces will be removed for off-Site disposal. A copy of the current redevelopment Site plan is included in Appendix A, and a grading plan is included in Appendix B. 4) Do plans include demolition of structure(s)?: ☐ Yes ☒ No ☐ Unknown ☐ If yes, please check here to confirm that demolition will be conducted in accordance with applicable legal requirements, including without limitation those related to lead and asbestos abatement that are administered by the Health Hazards Control Unit within the Division of Public Health of the North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services. If available, please provide a copy of your demolition permit. 5) Are sediment and erosion control measures required by federal, state, or local regulations? ☒ Yes ☐ No ☐ Unknown ☒ If yes, please check here to confirm that demolition will be conducted in accordance with applicable legal requirements. If soil disturbance is necessary to install sediment and erosion control measures, they may not begin until this EMP is approved. 6) Which category of risk-based screening level is used or is anticipated to be specified in the Brownfields Agreement? Note: If children frequent the property, residential screening levels shall be cited in the Brownfields Agreement for comparison purposes. ☐ Residential ☒ Non-Residential or Industrial/Commercial 7) Schedule for Redevelopment (attach construction schedule): a) Construction start date: 7/12/2021 b) Anticipated duration (specify activities during each phase): Redevelopment activities are expected to take up to approximately ten months to complete. A copy of the current construction schedule is included in Appendix C. c) Additional phases planned? ☒ Yes ☐ No 7 EMP Version 2, January 2021 If yes, specify the start date and/or activities if known: Start Date: Unknown Planned Activity: Proposed redevelopment plans could potentially include expansion of the new building by approximately 12,000 sq ft (Figure 3). Start Date: N/A Planned Activity: N/A Start Date: Planned Activity: N/A d) Provide the planned date of occupancy for new buildings: 3/1/2022 CONTAMINATED MEDIA Please fill out the sections below, using detailed site plans, if available, or estimate using known areas of contaminated soil and a conceptual redevelopment plan. Provide a figure overlaying new construction onto figure showing contaminated soil and groundwater locations. 1) Contaminated Media on the Brownfields Property Part 1. Soil:……………………………………….……………. ☒ Yes ☐ No ☐ Suspected ☐ Unknown Part 2. Groundwater:.……………………….……..……. ☒ Yes ☐ No ☐ Suspected ☐ Unknown Part 3. Surface Water:.……………...……..…………… ☐ Yes ☒ No ☐ Suspected ☐ Unknown Part 4. Sediment:.……………...……..…………………… ☐ Yes ☒ No ☐ Suspected ☐ Unknown Part 5. Soil Vapor:…..…………...……..…………………. ☐ Yes ☐ No ☒ Suspected ☐ Unknown Part 6. Sub-Slab Soil Vapor:……...……..…………….. ☒ Yes ☐ No ☐ Suspected ☐ Unknown Part 7. Indoor Air:...……..…………………………………. ☒ Yes ☐ No ☐ Suspected ☐ Unknown 2) For the Area of Proposed Redevelopment on the Brownfields Property, attach tabulated data summaries for each impacted media and figure(s) with sample locations. PART 1. Soil 1) Known or suspected contaminants in soil (list general groups of contaminants): A release of tetrachlorethylene (PCE) was identified at the Brownfields property in 1996 following removal of two tanks associated with a former septic system (Figure 3). As part of corrective action following removal of the tanks, soil was excavated from the tank areas and land applied on an adjacent field. Sampling results of the excavated soil did not indicate evidence of 8 EMP Version 2, January 2021 impact according to an Environmental Response Actions: Carolina Medical report dated December 1996. Addition soil sampling in the holding tank excavation area was completed as part of assessment activities document in a February 22, 2010 Comprehensive Site Assessment Report and a September 13, 2010 Comprehensive Site Assessment Report Addendum prepared by Mineral Springs Environmental, P.C. During the assessments, PCE was detected in soil samples 1D-5 (estimated 0.0013 J milligrams per kilogram [mg/kg]) and B-2 (0.0139 mg/kg) collected at approximately 5 feet below ground surface (ft bgs) and at least 10 ft bgs, respectively. The PCE concentrations are below the July 2021 DEQ Industrial/Commercial Preliminary Soil Remediation Goal (PSRG) of 82 mg/kg. Other than lab contaminants, no other volatile organic compounds (VOCs) were detected at concentrations above laboratory method detection limits. Analyses for semi-VOCs (SVOCs) and/or metals was not performed as part of the soil assessments. However, the PD proposes to conduct additional soil sampling to determine Site-specific levels of naturally occurring metals (see Imported Fill Section 1.B.) Excerpts from the 1996 and 2010 reports are included in Appendix D. 2) Depth of known or suspected contaminants (feet): 5 to 15 ft bgs 3) Area of soil disturbed by redevelopment (square feet): Based on the grading plan (Appendix B), approximately 153,000 sq ft (approximately 3.5 acres) is expected to be disturbed during redevelopment activities. 4) Depths of soil to be excavated (feet): Proposed grading activities are expected to include excavations of up to approximately 2 to 3 ft bgs for installation of footers and utilities. 5) Estimated volume of soil (cubic yards) to be excavated (attach grading plan): Up to approximately 7,500 cubic yards of soil are planned to be excavated and re-used on-Site as beneficial fill during grading activities. 6) Estimated volume of excavated soil (cubic yards) anticipated to be impacted by contaminants: Excavation of impacted soil is not anticipated based on results of soil sampling conducted in the redevelopment area following excavation activities. See No. 1 above for additional information. 7) Estimated volume of contaminated soil expected to be disposed of offsite, if applicable: Excavation of impacted soil is not anticipated. Part 1.A. MANAGING ONSITE SOIL If soil is anticipated to be excavated from the Brownfield Property, relocated on the Brownfields 9 EMP Version 2, January 2021 Property, or otherwise disturbed during site grading or other redevelopment activities, please provide a grading plan that clearly illustrates areas of cut and fill (approximate areas & volumes are acceptable, if only preliminary data available). 1) HAZARDOUS WASTE DETERMINATION: a) Does the soil contain a LISTED WASTE as defined in the North Carolina Hazardous Waste Section under 40 CFR Part 261.31-261.35?....................................... ☐Yes ☒No ☐ If yes, explain why below, including the level of knowledge regarding processes generating the waste (include pertinent analytical results as needed). ☐ If yes, do the soils exceed the “Contained-Out” levels in Attachment 1 of the North Carolina Contained-In Policy?................................................. ☐ Yes ☐ No b) NOTE: IF SOIL MEETS THE DEFINITION OF A LISTED HAZARDOUS WASTE AND EXCEEDS THE CONTAINED-OUT LEVELS IN ATTACHMENT 1 TO THE NORTH CAROLINA CONTAINED-IN POLICY THE SOIL MAY NOT BE RE-USED ON SITE AND MUST BE DISPOSED OF IN ACCORDANCE WITH DEQ HAZARDOUS WASTE SECTION RULES AND REGULATIONS. c) Does the soil contain a CHARACTERISTIC WASTE?.................................... ☐ Yes ☒ No ☐ If yes, mark reason(s) why below (and include pertinent analytical results). ☐ Ignitability ☐ Corrosivity ☐ Reactivity ☐ Toxicity ☐ TCLP results ☐ Rule of 20 results (20 times total analytical results for an individual hazardous constituent on TCLP list cannot, by test method, exceed regulatory TCLP standard) ☒ If no, explain rationale: Soil analytical data does not indicate detections capable of exceeding toxicity characteristic leaching procedure (TCLP) criteria using the Rule of 20. d) NOTE: IF SOIL MEETS THE DEFINITION OF A CHARACTERISTIC HAZARDOUS WASTE, THE SOIL MAY NOT BE RE-USED ON SITE AND MUST BE DISPOSED OF IN ACCORDANCE WITH DEQ HAZARDOUS WASTE SECTION RULES AND REGULATIONS. 2) Screening criteria by which soil disposition decisions will be made (e.g., left in place, capped in place with low permeability barrier, removed to onsite location and capped, removed offsite): 10 EMP Version 2, January 2021 ☐ Preliminary Health-Based Residential SRGs ☒ Preliminary Health-Based Industrial/Commercial SRGs ☒ Division of Waste Management Risk Calculator (For Brownfields Properties Only) ☐ Site-specific risk-based cleanup level. Please provide details of methods used for determination/explanation. Additional comments: 3) If known impacted soil is proposed to be reused within the Brownfields Property Boundary, please check the measures that will be utilized to ensure safe placement and documentation of same. Please attach a proposed location diagram/site map. ☐ Provide documentation of analytical report(s) to Brownfields Project Manager ☐ Provide documentation of final location, thickness and depth of relocated soil on site map to Brownfields Project Manager once known ☐ Geotextile to mark depth of fill material. Provide description of material: ☐ Manage soil under impervious cap ☐ or clean fill ☐ ☐ Describe cap or fill: ☐ Confer with NC BF Project Manager if Brownfield Plat must be revised (or re-recorded if actions are Post-Recordation). ☐ GPS the location and provide site map with final location. ☒ Other. Please provide a description of the measure: 4) Please describe the following action(s) to be taken during and following excavation and management of site soils: Management of fugitive dust from site ☒ Yes, describe the method will include: During soil disturbance at the Site, the workers or contractors will observe soils for evidence of potential impacted soil, such as a distinct unnatural color, strong odor, or filled or previously disposed materials of concerns (i.e., chemicals, tanks, drums, etc.). Should the above be noted during Site work, the contractor will contact the project environmental professional to observe the suspect condition. If the project environmental professional confirms that the material may be impacted, then the procedures below will be implemented. In addition, the environmental professional will contact the DEQ Brownfields project manager within two business days to advise that person of the condition. 11 EMP Version 2, January 2021 The grading contractor will consider conditions such as wind speed, wind direction, and moisture content of soil during grading and stockpiling (if warranted) activities to minimize dust generation. In the unlikely event that contaminated soil is encountered during Site redevelopment that requires excavation, particular attention will be paid by contractors to implement dust control measures as needed based on Site and atmospheric conditions (i.e., by controlled water application, hydro-seeding, and/or mulch, stone, or plastic cover). Potentially impacted soil will be managed as described below. ☐ No, explain rationale: Field Screening of site soil ☒ Yes, describe the field screening method, frequency of field screening, person conducting field screening: During soil disturbance at the Site, the workers or contractors will observe soils for evidence of potential impacted soil, such as a distinct unnatural color, strong odor, or filled or previously disposed materials of concerns (i.e., chemicals, tanks, drums, etc.). Should the above be noted during Site work, the contractor will contact the project environmental professional to observe the suspect condition. If the project environmental professional confirms that the material may be impacted, then the procedures below will be implemented. In addition, the environmental professional will contact the DEQ Brownfields project manager within two business days to advise that person of the condition. ☐ No, explain rationale: Soil Sample Collection ☐ Yes, describe the sampling method (e.g., in-situ grab, composite, stockpile, etc.): ☒ No, explain rationale: Collection of additional soil samples is not anticipated based on results of previous Site assessment activities. If significant soil impact is encountered during grading and/or installation or removal of utilities, excavation will proceed only as far as needed to allow grading and/or construction of the utility to continue and/or only as far as needed to allow alternate corrective measures described below. Suspect significantly impacted soil excavated during grading and/or utility line installation or removal may be stockpiled and covered in a secure area to allow construction to progress. Suspect impacted soil will be underlain by and covered with minimum 10-mil plastic sheeting. At least one representative sample of the soil will be collected for analysis of VOCs, SVOCs, and RCRA metals. If the results of analysis of the sample indicate that the soil could potentially exceed toxicity characteristic hazardous waste criteria, then the soil will also be analyzed by TCLP for those compounds that could exceed the toxicity characteristic hazardous 12 EMP Version 2, January 2021 waste criteria. Impacted soil will be handled in the manner described below based upon the laboratory analyses: i. If no organic compounds are detected in a sample (other than which are attributable to sampling or laboratory artifacts]) and metals are below Residential PSRGs or are consistent with Site-specific and/or published background ranges for North Carolina soils, then the soil will be deemed suitable for use as on-Site fill or as off-Site fill. The proposed location(s) for off-Site placement of soil (other than a permitted facility), other applicable off-Site information (i.e., sampling results, if available), and the receiving facility’s written approval for acceptance of the soil will be provided to DEQ for approval prior to taking the soil off-Site. ii. If detectable levels of compounds are found which do not exceed the DEQ IHSB Industrial/Commercial PSRGs (other than which are attributable to sampling or laboratory artifacts or which are consistent with Site-specific and/or published background ranges for metals in North Carolina soils) and the TCLP concentrations are below hazardous waste criteria, then the soil may be used on-Site as fill without conditions. iii. If detectable levels of compounds are found which exceed the DEQ IHSB Industrial/Commercial PSRGs (other than which are attributable to sampling or laboratory artifacts or which are consistent with Site-specific and/or published background ranges for metals in North Carolina soils) and the TCLP concentrations are below hazardous waste criteria, then the soil, with DEQ’s written approval, may be used on-Site as fill below an impervious surface, or at least 2 ft of compacted clean soil. If the impacted soil with concentrations above Residential PSRGs is moved to an on-Site location, its location and depth will be documented, covered with a geotextile fabric so that its location can be identified if encountered in the future, and its location will be provided to DEQ. iv. Impacted soil may be transported to a permitted facility such as a Subtitle D, LCID, and/or C&D landfill provided that the soil is accepted at the disposal facility and DEQ approval to non-Subtitle D facilities. If soil is transported to a permitted facility, the permitted facility’s written approval to dispose of soil from the Site will be included with the final EMP report and/or the annual redevelopment summary report. In the unlikely event that the sample data indicates concentrations above TCLP hazardous waste criteria, then the soil must be transported off-site to a permitted disposal facility that can accept or treat hazardous waste. If soil samples are collected for analysis, please check the applicable chemical analytes: ☒ Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by EPA Method 8260 ☒ Semi-volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) by EPA Method 8270 ☒ Metals RCRA List (8) (arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium, mercury, lead, selenium and silver): Specify Analytical Method Number(s): EPA Methods 6020/7471 ☐ Pesticides: Specify Analytical Method Number(s): 13 EMP Version 2, January 2021 ☐ PCBs: Specify Analytical Method Number(s): ☐ Other Constituents & Respective Analytical Method(s) (i.e. Hexavalent Chromium, Herbicides, etc.): Specify Analytical Method Number(s): ☒ Check to confirm that stockpiling of known or suspected impacted soils will be conducted in accordance with Figure 1 of this EMP. Stockpile methodology should provide erosion control, prohibiting contact between surface water/precipitation and contaminated soil, and preventing contaminated runoff. Explain any variances or provide additional details as needed: ☒ Final grade sampling of exposed native soil (i.e., soil that will not be under buildings or permanent hardscape). Select chemical analyses for final grade samples with check boxes below (Check all that apply): ☒ Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by EPA Method 8260 ☒ Semi-volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) by EPA Method 8270 ☒ Metals RCRA List (8) (arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium, mercury, lead, selenium and silver): Specify Analytical Method Number(s): EPA Methods 6020/7471 ☐ Pesticides: Specify Analytical Method Number(s): ☐ PCBs: Specify Analytical Method Number(s): ☒ Other Constituents & Respective Analytical Method(s) (i.e. Hexavalent Chromium, Herbicides, etc.): Soil samples will be collected for hexavalent chromium and put on hold for potential analysis by EPA Method 7199. The laboratory will be directed to hold all hexavalent chromium analyses pending the results of the total chromium analyses. If total chromium is detected in any of the soil samples above the current hexavalent chromium Industrial/Commercial PSRG, the sample exhibiting the highest total chromium concentration will be analyzed for hexavalent chromium. If hexavalent chromium is detected in that sample above the current hexavalent chromium Industrial/Commercial PSRG, the remaining soil samples may be analyzed for hexavalent chromium subject to approval by DEQ Brownfields. 14 EMP Version 2, January 2021 Please provide a scope of work for final grade sampling, including a diagram of soil sampling locations, number of samples to be collected, and brief sampling methodology. Samples should be collected from 0-2 ft below ground surface, with the exception of VOCs which should be taken from 1-2 ft below ground surface. Alternatively, indicate if a work plan for final grade sampling may be submitted under separate cover. ☐ If final grade sampling was NOT selected, please explain rationale: Following completion of soil disturbance for any discrete future Site development (i.e., after grading and utility construction), an environmental professional will be contracted to assess the development area for areas that are not covered with a minimum of 2 ft of clean fill soil or topsoil, building foundations, sidewalks, asphalt or concrete parking areas, driveways or other impervious surfaces. If such areas exist, a Work Plan will be prepared for final grade sampling for DEQ review and approval. If no such areas exist, documentation will be provided to DEQ. Part 1.B. IMPORTED FILL SOIL NO SOIL MAY BE BROUGHT ONTO THE BROWNFIELDS PROPERTY WITHOUT PRIOR APPROVAL FROM THE BROWNFIELDS PROGRAM. According to the Brownfields IR 15, “Documenting imported soil (by sampling, analysis, and reporting in accordance with review and written approval in advance by the Brownfields Program), will safeguard the liability protections provided by the brownfields agreement and is in the best interest of the prospective developer/property owner.” Requirements for importing fill: 1) Will fill soil be imported to the site?................................................ ☒ Yes ☐ No ☐ Unknown 2) If yes, what is the estimated volume of fill soil to be imported? Approximately 15,000 cy of soil will be imported to the Site to reach final proposed grades. 3) If yes, what is the anticipated depth that fill soil will be placed at the property? (If a range of depths, please list the range.) Fill soils are planned to be placed at the Site in select locations at depths up to approximately 12 feet. A copy of the grading plan, which indicates areas of fill, is included in Appendix B. 4) Provide the source of fill, including: location, site history, nearby environmental concerns, etc. Attach aerial photos, maps, historic Sanborn maps and a borrow source site history: Approximately 15,000 cy of soil is proposed for import to the Site from an undeveloped property located south of Peachtree Lane in King, Stokes County, NC. The approximately 4.25-acre parcel (Stokes County Parcel No. 6901391053.000) is owned by Merritt Land Company LLC (Merritt). According to a representative of Merritt, the property has been vacant wooded land for at least approximately 40 years. Recently, the land was cleared of vegetation in anticipation of future 15 EMP Version 2, January 2021 residential development, which is consistent with the surrounding properties. A proposed grading plan is included in Appendix E. For import to the Site, the borrow source property owner indicated that soil will be excavated and direct-loaded onto trucks for export to the Brownfields property. Copies of aerial photographs dating back to 1998 are included in Appendix F. 5) PRIOR TO ITS PLACEMENT AT THE BROWNFIELDS PROPERTY, provide a plan to analyze fill soil to demonstrate that it meets acceptable standards applicable to the site and can be approved for use at the Brownfields property. See No. 7 below for details outlining the proposed plan to demonstrate import soil (not topsoil) meets acceptable standards to the Site. 6) Please check the applicable chemical analytes for fill soil samples. (Check all that apply): ☒ Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by EPA Method 8260 ☒ Semi-volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) by EPA Method 8270 ☒ Metals RCRA List (8) (arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium, mercury, lead, selenium and silver): Specify Analytical Method Number(s): EPA Methods 6020/7471 ☐ Pesticides: Specify Analytical Method Number(s): ☐ PCBs: Specify Analytical Method Number(s): ☒ Other Constituents & Respective Analytical Method(s) (i.e. Hexavalent Chromium, Herbicides, etc.): Hexavalent Chromium by EPA Method 7199 7) The scope of work for import fill sampling may be provided below or in a Work Plan submitted separately for DEQ review and approval. Attach specific location maps for in-situ borrow sites. If using a quarry, provide information on the type of material to be brought onto the Brownfields Property. The PD plans to import virgin fill material from the off-Site borrow source property referenced above. The borrow source is not a permitted quarry, and is not recycled material from a DEQ Brownfields pre-approved borrow source. The borrow source will be sampled in general accordance with the most recent versions of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Region IV Science and Ecosystem Support Division (SESD) Field Branches Quality System and Technical Procedures guidance. The PD will follow the procedures outlined below to demonstrate import soil meets acceptable criteria for Site use. Soil samples will be collected from the borrow source for laboratory analysis at a general rate of approximately one sample per 1,000 cy for the first approximately 5,000 cy, and then approximately one sample per 5,000 cy for the balance (7 total samples). A proposed grading 16 EMP Version 2, January 2021 plan with proposed soil sample locations is included in Appendix E. Specifically, composite soil samples will be collected using a decontaminated hand auger. Each composite sample will be comprised of soil from four grab sample locations (i.e., aliquots) at depths of up to proposed cut (to be determined in the field with the borrow source property owner, but not expected to exceed approximately 5 ft bgs) that are combined to form one sample for laboratory analysis. Continuous soil samples will be collected from the center of the hand auger bucket at each boring and logged for lithological description and field screened for indication of potential impacts by observation for staining, unusual odors, and the presence of volatile organic vapors using a calibrated photoionization detector (PID). VOC samples will be collected as grab samples using a decontaminated stainless-steel hand auger from the general area of the aliquot which exhibits the highest indication of impact during field screening. The soil samples will be placed in dedicated laboratory-supplied sample containers, covered with ice, and shipped to a North Carolina-certified laboratory under standard chain of custody protocols for laboratory analysis of VOCs by EPA Method 8260, SVOCs by EPA Method 8270 and RCRA metals plus hexavalent chromium by EPA Methods 6020/7471/7199. H&H will request a Level II QA/QC data package from the laboratory and the laboratory will report values to the laboratory-specified method detection limits using J-flags. To evaluate the reproducibility of the sample results, H&H will collect one duplicate soil sample, which will be submitted for the same laboratory analysis as their respective parent sample. Following sampling activities, the soil borings will be properly abandoned by placing soil cuttings back in their respective boreholes. The surface will then be repaired similar to pre-sampling conditions. Additionally, the soil sample locations will be estimated using a hand-held Global Positioning System (GPS) unit. Fill soil will be considered suitable for use at the Site if it does not contain compound concentrations above the lowest DEQ PSRGs (for compounds not known to exist at the Brownfields property), DEQ Industrial/Commercial PSRGs (for compounds present in soil at the Brownfields property), DWM Risk Calculator risk thresholds, and/or typical metals concentrations which are consistent with Site-specific and/or published background ranges for metals in regional soils. To determine Site-specific background ranged for metals, two soil samples will be collected from the Brownfields property for laboratory analysis of RCRA metals plus hexavalent chromium by EPA Methods 6020/7471/7199. The background soil samples will be collected as grab samples from approximately 3 ft bgs using the aforementioned sampling methodologies. Proposed background soil sample locations are identified in Figure 3. DEQ approval of the import soil analytical results will be obtained prior to exporting soil to the Brownfields property. 17 EMP Version 2, January 2021 Part 1.C. EXPORTED SOIL NO SOIL MAY LEAVE THE BROWNFIELDS PROPERTY WITHOUT APPROVAL FROM THE BROWNFIELDS PROGRAM. FAILURE TO OBTAIN APPROVAL MAY VIOLATE A BROWNFIELDS AGREEMENT CAUSING A REOPENER OR JEOPARDIZING ELIGIBILITY IN THE PROGRAM, ENDANGERING LIABILITY PROTECTIONS AND MAKING SAID ACTION POSSIBLY SUBJECT TO ENFORCEMENT. JUSTIFICATIONS PROVIDED BELOW MUST BE APPROVED BY THE PROGRAM IN WRITING PRIOR TO COMPLETING TRANSPORT ACTIVITIES. Please refer to Brownfields IR 15 for additional details. 1) If export from a Brownfields Property is anticipated, please provide details regarding the proposed export actions. Volume of exported soil, depths, location from which soil will be excavated on site, related sampling results, etc. Provide a site map with locations of export and sampling results included. Export soil is not anticipated at this time. Should soil need to be exported from the Brownfields property during redevelopment, soil will be sampled in general accordance with the most recent versions of the EPA Region IV SESD Field Branches Quality System and Technical Procedures guidance. Samples will be collected from export soil at a rate of one (1) sample per every approximately 1,000 cy of export for laboratory analysis of VOCs by EPA Method 8260, SVOCs by EPA Method 8270, and RCRA metals plus hexavalent chromium by EPA Methods 6020/7471/7199. SVOCs and metals will be collected as composite samples using a decontaminated stainless-steel hand auger. Soil samples will also be collected for hexavalent chromium and placed on hold for potential analysis by EPA Method 7199. The laboratory will be directed to hold all hexavalent chromium analyses pending the results of the total chromium analyses. If total chromium is detected in any of the soil samples above the current hexavalent chromium Residential PSRG, the sample exhibiting the highest total chromium concentration will be analyzed for hexavalent chromium. If hexavalent chromium is detected in that sample above the current hexavalent chromium Residential PSRG, the remaining soil samples may be analyzed for hexavalent chromium subject to approval by DEQ Brownfields. The composite samples will consist of three sample aliquots that are combined to form one sample for laboratory analysis. Each aliquot will be field screened for the presence of VOCs using a calibrated PID. VOC samples will be collected as grab samples using a decontaminated stainless-steel hand auger from the general area of the aliquot which exhibits the highest indication of impact during field screening. The soil samples will be placed in dedicated laboratory-supplied sample containers, covered with ice, and shipped to a North Carolina- certified laboratory under standard chain of custody protocols. DEQ approval of the analytical results will be obtained prior to transporting export soil from the Site. Based on analytical results of soil samples collected from the export soil, the soil will be transported off-Site to a suitable location. The PD will notify DEQ Brownfields of the location 18 EMP Version 2, January 2021 receiving the export soil. If not a Subtitle D permitted facility, DEQ Brownfields approval and written approval from the receiving facility will be obtained prior to transporting the soil off-Site. 2) To what type of facility will the export Brownfields soil be sent? ☒ Subtitle D/Municipal Solid Waste Landfill (analytical program to be determined by landfill) ☒ Permitted but Unlined Landfill (i.e. LCID, C&D, etc.) Analytical program to be determined by the accepting Landfill; ☒ Landfarm or other treatment facility ☒ Use as fill at another suitable Brownfields Property – determination that a site is suitable will require, at a minimum, that similar concentrations of the same or similar contaminants already exist at both sites, use of impacted soil will not increase the potential for risk to human health and the environment at the receiving Brownfields property, and that a record of the acceptance of such soil from the property owner of the receiving site is provided to Brownfields. Please provide additional details below. ☒ Use as Beneficial Fill off-site at a non-Brownfields Property - Please provide documentation of approval from the property owner for receipt of fill material. This will also require approval by the DEQ Solid Waste Section. Additional information is provided in IR 15. Please provide additional details below. 3) Additional Details: (if transfer of soil to another property is requested above, please provide details related to the proposed plans). The environmental professional will contact DEQ Brownfields to obtain DEQ Brownfields and DEQ Solid Waste approval prior to exporting soil to a non-Brownfields property. Part 1.D. MANAGEMENT OF UTILITY TRENCHES ☐ Install liner between native impacted soils and base of utility trench before filling with clean fill (Preferred) ☒ Last out, first in principle for impacted soils (if soil can safely be reused onsite and is not a hazardous waste), i.e., impacted soils are placed back at approximately the depths they were removed from such that impacted soil is not placed at a greater depth than the original depth from which it was excavated. ☐ Evaluate whether necessary to install barriers in conduits to prevent soil vapor transport, and/or degradation of conduit materials due to direct impact with contaminants? ☐ If yes, provide specifications on barrier materials or provide the results of this evaluation in the Vapor Mitigation Plan. Note that if vapor mitigation is planned for site buildings, utility corridors will need to be evaluated as part of mitigation designs: 19 EMP Version 2, January 2021 ☐ If no, include rationale here: ☒ Unknown, details to be provided in the Vapor Mitigation Plan for site buildings Other comments regarding managing impacted soil in utility trenches: Results of soil assessment activities indicated that VOC concentrations do not exceed Industrial/Commercial PSRGs. Although not anticipated, in the event contaminated soil and/or vapors (based on unusual odors) are encountered in utility trenches during redevelopment activities, the trench will be evacuated and appropriate safety screening of the vapors will be performed to protect workers. If results indicate further action is warranted in response to vapors to protect workers, appropriate engineering controls (such as use of industrial fans) will be implemented. The contractor and workers will observe soil for potential impacts during utility installation activities. Evidence of potential impacted soil includes a distinct unnatural color, strong odor, or filled or previously disposed materials of concerns (i.e., chemicals, tanks, drums, etc.). Should the above be noted during utility work, the contractor will contact the project environmental professional to observe the suspect condition. If the project environmental professional confirms that the material may be impacted, then the procedures outlined Managing On-Site Soil above will be implemented. In addition, the environmental professional will contact the DEQ Brownfields project manager within two business days to advise that person of the condition. PART 2. GROUNDWATER 1) What is the depth to groundwater at the Brownfields Property? Based upon groundwater assessment activities conducted by MSE in 2010, depth to groundwater on the Brownfields property was measured from approximately 47 to 55 ft bgs. 2) Is groundwater known to be contaminated by ☒onsite ☐offsite ☐both or ☐unknown sources? Describe source(s): Groundwater assessment activities conducted at the Brownfields property have identified PCE at concentrations (up to 660 micrograms per liter [ug/L]) above the DEQ 2L Groundwater Quality Standard (2L Standard). 3) What is the direction of groundwater flow at the Brownfields Property? Area topography and previous investigations suggest that groundwater flow is likely towards the northwest towards Crooked Run Creek. 4) Will groundwater likely be encountered during planned redevelopment activities? ☐Yes ☒No If yes, describe these activities: Groundwater is not expected to be encountered during redevelopment activities. However, if groundwater is encountered, the PD or the PD’s contractor will contact the project environmental professional. The environmental professional will update the DEQ Brownfields 20 EMP Version 2, January 2021 project manager within two business days. Regardless of the answer; in the event that contaminated groundwater is encountered during redevelopment activities (even if no is checked above), list activities for contingent management of groundwater (e.g., dewatering of groundwater from excavations or foundations, containerizing, offsite disposal, discharge to sanitary sewer, NPDES permit, or sampling procedures). Although not anticipated at this time, appropriate worker safety measures will be undertaken if groundwater gathers in an open excavation within an area determined to be impacted during construction activities. The accumulated water will be allowed to evaporate, tested and disposed off-Site (if impacted), or tested and discharged to the storm sewer (if not impacted above DEQ surface water standards) in accordance with applicable municipal and State regulations for erosion control and construction stormwater control. 5) Are monitoring wells currently present on the Brownfields Property?.................☒Yes ☐No If yes, are any monitoring wells routinely monitored through DEQ or other agencies?..................................................................................................................☐Yes ☒No 6) Please check methods to be utilized in the management of known and previously unidentified wells. ☒ Abandonment of site monitoring wells in accordance with all applicable regulations. It is the Brownfields Program’s intent to allow proper abandonment of well(s) as specified in the Brownfields Agreement, except if required for active monitoring through another section of DEQ or the EPA. ☒ Location of existing monitoring wells marked ☒ Existing monitoring wells protected from disturbance ☒ Newly identified monitoring wells will be marked and protected from further disturbance until notification to DEQ Brownfields can be made and approval for abandonment is given. 7) Please provide additional details as needed: Please note, disturbance of existing site monitoring wells without approval by DEQ is not permissible. If monitoring wells are damaged and/or destroyed, DEQ may require that the PD be responsible for replacement of the well. PART 3. SURFACE WATER 1) Is surface water present at the property? ☐ Yes ☒ No ☐ Unknown According to a previously DEQ-approved EMP dated January 29, 2021, the Brownfields Program has granted preliminary approval to abandon monitoring wells located in the proposed area of disturbance that hinder construction and grading activities. Monitoring wells located outside of the area of disturbance will be marked and protected. 21 EMP Version 2, January 2021 2) Attach a map showing the location of surface water at the Brownfields Property. 3) Is surface water at the property known to be contaminated? ☐ Yes ☒ No 4) Will workers or the public be in contact with surface water during planned redevelopment activities? ☐ Yes ☒ No 5) In the event that contaminated surface water is encountered during redevelopment activities, or clean surface water enters open excavations, list activities for management of such events (e.g. flooding, contaminated surface water run-off, stormwater impacts): If surface water run-off gathers in an open excavation within an area determined to be impacted during construction activities, appropriate worker safety measures will be undertaken. The accumulated water will be allowed to evaporate/infiltrate to the extent time for dissipation does not disrupt the construction schedule. Should the time be needed for natural dissipation of accumulated water be deemed inadequate, the water will be tested and disposed off-site (if impacted), or tested and discharged to the storm sewer (if not impacted above DEQ surface water standards) in accordance with applicable municipal and State regulations for erosion control and construction stormwater control. PART 4. SEDIMENT 1) Are sediment sources present on the property? ☐ Yes ☒ No 2) If yes, is sediment at the property known to be contaminated: ☐ Yes ☐ No ☐ Unknown 3) Will workers or the public be in contact with sediment during planned redevelopment activities? ☐ Yes ☒ No 4) Attach a map showing location of known contaminated sediment at the property. 5) In the event that contaminated sediment is encountered during redevelopment activities, list activities for management of such events (stream bed disturbance): Not applicable. PART 5. SOIL VAPOR 1) Do concentrations of volatile organic compounds at the Brownfields property exceed the following vapor intrusion screening levels (current version) in the following media: IHSB Residential Screening Levels: Soil Vapor:………..☐ Yes ☐ No ☒ Unknown Groundwater:.….☒ Yes ☐ No ☐ Unknown IHSB Industrial/Commercial Screening Levels: 22 EMP Version 2, January 2021 Soil Vapor:………..☐ Yes ☐ No ☒ Unknown Groundwater:…..☒ Yes ☐ No ☐ Unknown 2) Attach a map showing the locations of soil vapor contaminants that exceed site screening levels. 3) If applicable, at what depth(s) is soil vapor known to be contaminated? 4) Will workers encounter contaminated soil vapor during planned redevelopment activities? ☐ Yes ☐ No ☒ Unknown In the event that contaminated soil vapor is encountered during redevelopment activities (trenches, manways, basements or other subsurface work,) list activities for management of such contact: In the unlikely event impacted soil vapors (based on unusual odors) are encountered during future redevelopment activities, worker breathing zone will be monitored using a calibrated PID. If results indicate further action is warranted, appropriate engineering controls (such as use of industrial fans) will be implemented. PART 6. SUB-SLAB SOIL VAPOR 1) Do concentrations of volatile organic compounds at the Brownfields property exceed the following vapor intrusion screening levels (current version) in sub-slab soil vapor: IHSB Residential Screening Levels: Soil Vapor:………..☒ Yes ☐ No ☐ Unknown Groundwater:.….☒ Yes ☐ No ☐ Unknown IHSB Industrial/Commercial Screening Levels: Soil Vapor:………..☒ Yes ☐ No ☐ Unknown 2) Groundwater:…..☒ Yes ☐ No ☐ Unknown If data indicate that sub-slab soil vapor concentrations exceed screening levels, attach a map showing the location of these exceedances. 3) At what depth(s) is sub-slab soil vapor known to be contaminated? ☒0-6 inches ☐Other, please describe: 4) Will workers encounter contaminated sub-slab soil vapor during planned redevelopment activities? ☐ Yes ☐ No ☒ Unknown ☐ If no, include rationale here: 5) In the event that contaminated soil vapor is encountered during redevelopment activities, list activities for management of such contact In the unlikely event impacted soil vapors are encountered during future redevelopment 23 EMP Version 2, January 2021 activities, worker breathing zone will be monitored using a calibrated PID. If results indicate further action is warranted, appropriate engineering controls (such as use of industrial fans) will be implemented. PART 7. INDOOR AIR 1) Are indoor air data available for the Brownfields Property? ☒ Yes ☐ No ☐ Unknown 2) Attach a map showing the location(s) where indoor air contaminants exceed site screening levels. 3) If the structures where indoor air has been documented to exceed risk-based screening levels will not be demolished as part of redevelopment activities, will workers encounter contaminated indoor air during planned redevelopment activities? ☐ Yes ☒ No ☐ Unknown ☐ If no, include rationale here: 4) In the event that contaminated indoor air is encountered during redevelopment activities, list activities for management of such contact: VAPOR INTRUSION MITIGATION SYSTEM Is a vapor intrusion mitigation system (VIMS) proposed for this Brownfields Property? ☒ Yes ☐ No ☐ Unknown ☐ If no or unknown, include rationale here as well as plans for pre-occupancy sampling, as necessary: If yes, ☐ VIMS Plan Attached or ☒ VIMS Plan to be submitted separately If submitted separately provide date: VIMS details will be provided to DEQ Brownfields under separate cover. In the unlikely event there is evidence of potential indoor air issues (i.e., unusual odors) during future redevelopment activities, the area will be evacuated and appropriate safety screening of the indoor air will be performed. If warranted, safety screening procedures will include periodically screening indoor air for volatile organic vapors with a calibrated photoionization detector and calibrated methane gas detector. If results indicate further action is warranted, appropriate engineering controls (such as use of industrial fans) will be implemented. 24 EMP Version 2, January 2021 VIMS Plan shall be signed and sealed by a NC Professional Engineer If no, please provide a brief rationale as to why no vapor mitigation plan is warranted: Note that approval of this EMP does not imply approval with any vapor intrusion mitigation land use restrictions or requirements of the recorded or draft Brownfields Agreement and that separate approval of mitigation measures will be required. CONTINGENCY PLAN – encountering unknown tanks, drums, or other waste materials In this section please provide actions that will be taken to identify or manage unknown potential new sources of contamination. During redevelopment activities, it is not uncommon that unknown tanks, drums, fuel lines, landfills, or other waste materials are encountered. Notification to DEQ Brownfields Project Manager, UST Section, Fire Department, and/or other officials, as necessary and appropriate, is required when new potential source(s) of contamination are discovered. These Notification Requirements were outlined on Page 1 of this EMP. Should potentially impacted materials be identified that are inconsistent with known site impacts, the DEQ Brownfields Project Manager will be notified and a sampling plan will be prepared based on the EMP requirements and site-specific factors. Samples will generally be collected to document the location of the potential impacts. Check the following chemical analysis that are to be conducted on newly identified releases: ☒ Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by EPA Method 8260 ☒ Semi-volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) by EPA Method 8270 ☒ Metals RCRA List (8) (arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium, mercury, lead, selenium and silver) EPA Method 6020 and EPA Method 7471 ☐ Pesticides: Specify Analytical Method Number(s): ☐ PCBs: Specify Analytical Method Number(s): ☒ Other Constituents & Analytical Method(s) (i.e. Hexavalent Chromium, Herbicides, etc.) Please note, if field observations indicate the need for additional analyses, they should be conducted, even if not listed here. Hexavalent Chromium by EPA Method 7196 Please provide details on the proposed methods of managing the following commonly encountered issues during redevelopment of Brownfields Properties. During construction activities, contractors may encounter unknown sub-surface environmental conditions (i.e., tanks, drums, or waste materials) that if encountered, will require proper 25 EMP Version 2, January 2021 management. Prior to beginning Site work, H&H will attend a pre-construction meeting with the PD and the redevelopment contractors to discuss the DEQ approved EMP and various scenarios when it would be appropriate and necessary to notify H&H of the discovery of unknown subsurface features or potentially impacted media at the Site. In the event that such conditions are encountered during Site development activities, the environmental actions noted below will be used to direct environmental actions to be taken during these activities and sampling data for potentially impacted soil and the disposition of impacted soil will be provided to DEQ when the data becomes available. Underground Storage Tanks: In the event a UST or impacts associated with a UST release are discovered at the Site during redevelopment activities, the UST and/or UST related impacts will be addressed through the Brownfields Program. If a UST is encountered, the UST will be removed and transported off-Site for disposal at a suitable facility. If the UST contains residual fluids, the fluids will be sampled for VOCs, SVOCs, and RCRA metals, and transported off-Site for disposal at a suitable facility based on the laboratory analytical results prior to removing the UST from the ground. If a UST is encountered outside of the new building footprint that cannot be removed or does not require removal for geotechnical or construction purposes, with DEQ prior approval it will be abandoned in-place and construction will proceed. Impacted soil in the vicinity of the UST will be managed in accordance with the Managing On-Site Soil section outlined above in the EMP. If a UST will be left in-place, DEQ Brownfields will be notified. Sub-Grade Feature/Pit: If a sub-grade feature or pit is encountered outside of the new building footprint and does not require removal for geotechnical or construction purposes, it will be filled with soil or suitable fill and construction will proceed. Where appropriate, the bottom may be penetrated before back filling to prevent fluid accumulation. If the pit has waste in it, the waste will be set aside in a secure area and will be sampled for waste disposal purposes for TCLP VOCs, TCLP SVOCs, and TCLP metals and disposed off-site at a permitted facility or the waste will be managed in accordance with the Managing On-Site Soil section outlined above in the EMP, whichever is most applicable based on the type of waste present. If the pit must be removed and the observed waste characteristics indicate the concrete may potentially be contaminated, the concrete will be sampled and analyzed by methods specified by the disposal facility. Buried Waste Material – Note that if buried waste, non-native fill, or any obviously filled materials is encountered, the DEQ Brownfields Program must be notified to determine if investigation of landfill gases is required: If excavation into buried wastes or impacted soils occurs, the contractor is instructed to stop work in that location and notify the environmental consultant. The environmental consultant will review the materials, discuss with DEQ Brownfields, and collect samples if warranted. In this event, 26 EMP Version 2, January 2021 confirmation sampling will be conducted at representative locations in the base and the sidewalls of the excavation after the waste or impacted soil is removed. The confirmation samples will be analyzed for VOCs, SVOCs, and RCRA metals. Areas of suspected contaminated soil that remain at the Site after excavation is complete above the DEQ IHSB Industrial/Commercial PSRGs will be managed pursuant to this plan. Re-Use of Impacted Soils On-Site: Please refer to description outlined in the Managing On-Site Soil section of the EMP above. If unknown, impacted soil is identified on-site, management on-site can be considered after the project team provides the necessary information, outlined in Part 1.A. Item 11, for Brownfields Project Manager approval prior to final placement on-site. If other potential contingency plans are pertinent, please provide other details or scenarios as needed below: POST-REDEVELOPMENT REPORTING ☒ Check this box to acknowledge that a Redevelopment Summary Report will be required for the project. If the project duration is longer than one year, an annual update is required and will be due by January 31 of each year, or 30 days after each one-year anniversary of the effective date of this EMP (as agreed upon with the Project Manager). These reports will be required for as long as physical redevelopment of the Brownfields Property continues, except that the final Redevelopment Summary Report will be submitted within 90 days after completion of redevelopment. Based on the estimated construction schedule, the first Redevelopment Summary Report is anticipated to be submitted on 1/31/2022 The Redevelopment Summary Report shall include environment-related activities since the last report, with a summary and drawings, that describes: 1. actions taken on the Brownfields Property; 2. soil grading and cut and fill actions; 3. methodology(ies) employed for field screening, sampling and laboratory analysis of environmental media; 4. stockpiling, containerizing, decontaminating, treating, handling, laboratory analysis and ultimate disposition of any soil, groundwater or other materials suspected or confirmed to be contaminated with regulated substances; and 5. removal of any contaminated soil, water or other contaminated materials (for example, concrete, demolition debris) from the Brownfields Property (copies of all legally required manifests shall be included). 27 EMP Version 2, January 2021 ☒ Check box to acknowledge consent to provide a NC licensed P.G. or P.E. sealed, Redevelopment Summary Report in compliance with the site’s Brownfields Agreement. July 7, 2021 29 EMP Version 2, January 2021 USGS The National Map: National Boundaries Dataset, 3DEP ElevationProgram, Geographic Names Information System, National HydrographyDataset, National Land Cover Database, National Structures Dataset,and National Transportation Dataset; USGS Global Ecosystems; U.S.Census Bureau TIGER/Line data; USFS Road Data; Natural Earth Data;U.S. Department of State Humanitarian Information Unit; and NOAANational Centers for Environmental Information, U.S. Coastal ReliefModel. Data refreshed May, 2020. SITE LOCATION MAP CAROLINA MEDICAL ELECTRONICS157 INDUSTRIAL DRIVEKING, NORTH CAROLINA DATE: 5-25-21 JOB NO: DMM-001 REVISION NO: 0 FIGURE NO: 2 2923 South Tryon Street - Suite 100Charlotte, North Carolina 28203704-586-0007 (p) 704-586-0373 (f)License # C-1269 / # C-245 Geology TITLE PROJECT 0 2,000 4,000 SCALE IN FEET SITE Path: S:\AAA-Master Projects\Dynamic Machining x Manufacturing (DMM)\Drawings\Figure-1.mxdN U.S.G.S. QUADRANGLE MAP PINNACLE, NORTH CAROLINA 2019KING, NORTH CAROLINA 2019 QUADRANGLE7.5 MINUTE SERIES (TOPOGRAPHIC) US H IGHW AY 5 2 INDU STR I A L DR I VE SG-1 SG-2 SG-3 MW-1 MW-1D/1D-5 MW-2 MW-3 MW-4 MW-6 MW-8 MW-7 MW-5 MW-9 MW-10 B-1 B-2 B-4 B-3 REVISION NO. 0 JOB NO. DMM-001 REDEVELOPMENT PLAN WITH SAMPLING LOCATIONS 3921 Sunset Ridge Road, Suite 301Raleigh, North Carolina 27607919-847-4241(p) 919-847-4261(f) License # C-1269 / #C-245 Geology NOTES: 1. AERIAL IMAGERY OBTAINED FROM NC ONEMAP SERVICES (2018). 2. SUBJECT PARCEL DATA OBTAINED FROM SURVEY PLAT DATED 5/24/2012. OTHER BASE DATA OBTAINED FROM STOKES COUNTY GIS (2018). 3. SOIL BORING AND MONITORING WELL LOCATIONS APPROXIMATED FROM FIGURES INCLUDED IN MINERAL SPRINGS ENVIRONMENTAL, P.C.'S FEBRUARY 22, 2010 COMPREHENSIVE SITE ASSESSMENT REPORT AND SEPTEMBER 13, 2010 COMPREHENSIVE SITE ASSESSMENT REPORT ADDENDUM. 4. SUB-SLAB VAPOR SAMPLE LOCATIONS APPROXIMATED FROM FIGURES INCLUDED IN BY ECS CAROLINAS, LLP'S APRIL 26, 2012 REPORT OF SUB-SLAB GAS SAMPLING. DATE: 6-30-21 FIGURE NO. 3 CAROLINA MEDICAL ELECTRONICS 157 INDUSTRIAL DRIVE KINGS, NORTH CAROLINA LEGEND SITE PROPERTY BOUNDARY PARCEL LINE FUTURE BUILDING MONITORING WELL LOCATION DEEP MONITORING WELL LOCATION SOIL BORING LOCATION SUB-SLAB VAPOR SAMPLE LOCATION PROPOSED BACKGROUND SOIL SAMPLE LOCATION FORMER 100-GALLON HOLDING TANK FORMER 200-GALLON SEPTIC TANK POTENTIAL FUTURE EXPANSION AREA - NOT PART OF CURRENT REDEVELOPMENT PLANS M:\AAA_DRAFTING\DMM\DMM-001\Figures_20210630.dwg, FIG3, 7/1/2021 9:26:58 AM, shaynes Appendix A Redevelopment Plans 40% DESIGNDEVELOPMENT setNOT forconstructionPLAN - 40% DESIGNDEVELOPMENT setNOT forconstructionPLAN - 40% DESIGNDEVELOPMENT setNOT forconstructionPLAN - 40% DESIGNDEVELOPMENT setNOT forconstructionPLAN - Appendix B Grading Plan 1" BENT IRON PIPEWITNESSED BY TALL 5/8"REBARIRON FOUNDDRIVEN IRON FOUND; 5/8"IRON REBAR FOUNDS29°10'03"E, 0.35' FROM IRON1" IRON PIPEFOUND3/4" IRON PIPE FOUND;WITNESSED BY 3/4" LAIDOVER IRON PIPE1" BENT IRON PIPE FOUND;WITNESSED BY NAIL SET ATBASE OF 6" WILD CHERRYSNAG1085108 0 10751070 1085108020' BUILDING SETBACKPIPE END NOT FOUND(shown for direction)4" PVC TOP= 1085.03'INV. IN=UNKNOWNCATCH BASIN TOP=1080.75'15" RCP INV. IN=1079.13'15" RCP INV. OUT=1079.04'CATCH BASIN TOP=1080.79'15" RCP INV. IN=1079.20'15" RCP INV. OUT=1078.96'12" HDPEINV. IN=1063.64'INV. OUT=1061.73'18" RCP INV.OUT=1078.13'1085EIP - EXISTING IRON FOUNDNIP - NEW IRON PIPE PLACEDPT. - POINT NOT SETNOTESRECORD REFERENCESLEGEND1. THIS MAP IS OF A CURRENT FIELD SURVEY ANDIS ORIENTED TO NC GRID (NAD 83) 2011.2. ALL MEASUREMENTS ARE HORIZONTALSURFACE MEASUREMENTS.3. THIS PROPERTY IS LOCATED IN FLOOD ZONE XAS SHOWN ON FLOOD MAP# 3710599100K, PANEL#5991 WITH AN EFFECTIVE DATE OF 1-2-2009.4. THIS SURVEY IS OF EXISTING PARCELS OWNEDBY DYNAMIC REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT LLC5. THIS PROPERTY IS SUBJECT TO BROWNFIELDSAGREEMENT RECORDED IN PB 11 PG 197. PLATRECORDED IN PB 11 PG 196 & 197. MONITORINGWELLS ARE FIELD LOCATED LOCATIONS ANDSCALED MAPPING LOCATIONS OF MONITORINGWELLS FROM THE BROWNFIELDS PLAT.DYNAMIC REAL ESTATEDEVELOPMENT LLCPO BOX 429KING, NC 27021OWNER/DEVELOPERPP. - POWER POLEOVERHEAD ELECTRIC WIRESZone: L-IFront: 30'Side: 15'Rear: 20'Height: 50'Required minimum lot size: 20,000 sq ftSITE DATAPROPERTY LINESRIGHT-OF-WAY LINESMINIMUM BUILDING SETBACK LINES60D CONTROLN:919224.047E:1595217.784Elevation:1080.570Conv.:-0.79247778Point Scale:1.0000298360D CONTROLN:918753.704E:1595525.625Elevation:1082.65Conv.:-0.79186111Point Scale:1.00002943MONITORING WELL LOCATED OR SCALED FROM PB 11 PG 196MINOR (1') CONTOURMAJOR (5') CONTOUR1/2" IRON PIPE FOUNDON LINE @ 300.03'RAILROAD SPIKEFOUND INPAVEMENT10831085OVERHEAD ELECTRIC EASEMENTNO CATCH BASIN4" PVC INV. IN.=1079.52'15" RCP INV. IN=1078.89'18" RCP INV. OUT=1078.32'UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC LINEUNDERGROUND COMMUNICATION LINE108810871086108 4 108310 8 3 108210811 0 7 9 1 0 7 8 1 0 7 7 1 0 7 6 1074 1073 10721071106910691066 1079 1079 1078 10821 0 8 4 108410831085 10 8 5 10 8 6 10 8 7 108810881087108610841083108210811062 1077PROPOSED MAJOR (1') CONTOURPROPOSED MINOR (5') CONTOUR10851083PROPOSED 12" HDPE 30 L.F.INV. IN = 1078.5'INV. OUT = 1078.0'Catch Basin #1Top Grate = 1081.5'12" HDPE out = 1078.5'Catch Basin #2Top Grate=1081.5'12" Inv. In = 1076.812" Inv. out = 1076.7'PROPOSED 12"INV. OUT=1068.0'SKIMMER BASIN #1Size @ bottom = 2400 SFDisturbed Area = 2.64 AcresSurface Area Req. = 4028 SFSurface Area Provided @ 1069 = 4400 SFVolume Req. = 4752 cu ft (176 cu yd)Volume Provided = 6805 cu ftTop Dam Elev. = 1070.0Bottom Basin Elev. = 1067.0Riser Outlet with SkimmerSkimmer Inv. In = 1067.0Top Riser = 1069.0Inv Outlet Pipe = 1065.0UNDERGROUND WATER LINE10701075 106810691071107210731074 106510641064Catch Basin #3Top Grate=1080.512" Inv. In = 1074.412" Inv. out = 1074.35Proposed Sewer ManholeInstalled by CityTop Rim = 1076.0Invert = 1073.0N = 918,935.28E = 1,594,907.86Sewer @ 1077.0±1084 1082 108210 8 2 10 8 1 1080 107910821082 1 0 8 5 1083 108210811080108010751070108010671070107010801075 10821085PROPOSED 12" HDPE, 106 L.F.INV. IN = 1078.5'INV. OUT = 1076.8'PROPOSED 12" HDPE, 134 L.F.INV. IN = 1076.8'INV. OUT = 1074.4'PROPOSED 12" HDPE, 208 L.F.INV. IN = 1074.4INV. OUT = 1068.0RIP-RAP SLOPEPROTECTIONSCHEMATIC SITE PLANforDYNAMIC MACHINING CITY OF KINGSTOKES COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA Appendix C Construction Schedule Cr ea DM2 Design Build EntTraid Builders of King Inc. EntJames Smith Th e 1 Ce Th is TASK ASSIGNED TO PROGRESS START END Ce ll Mobilization and Erosion Control Ce ll Mobilize equipment, materials and temp items 0% 7/12/21 7/13/21 R o Install erosion control 0% 7/14/21 7/22/21 Th e Grading, Utilities, and Storm Drainage Grading 0% 7/22/21 9/6/21 Utilities 0% 8/10/21 8/20/21 Storm drainage 0% 8/9/21 8/20/21 Sam Foundation and Building Slab Foundation 0% 9/7/21 9/30/21 Building slab 0% 10/1/21 10/15/21 Site final prep 0% 10/16/21 10/30/21 Sam Pre‐Engineered Steel Building Delivery and Erection Estimated building delivery 0% 1/5/22 1/7/22 Building erection 0% 1/10/22 2/18/22 Interior Buildout, Electrical, Mechanical, and Office Upfit Office Upfit 0% 2/21/22 3/25/22 HVAC 0% 2/21/22 4/15/22 Plumbing 0% 2/21/22 4/8/22 Electrical 0% 2/21/22 4/29/22 Final Sitework, Paving, and Landscaping 0% 5/2/22 5/13/22 Mon, 7/12/2021Project Start: Display Week: Appendix D Assessment Analytical Data Summaries • Comprehensive Site Assessment Report, Mineral Springs Environmental, P.C., February 2010 • Comprehensive Site Assessment Report Addendum, Mineral Springs Environmental, P.C., September 2010 • Report of Sub-Slab Soil Gas Sampling, ECS Carolinas, LLP, April 2012 BK00011 PG:0197 LAND USE RESTRICTIONS N.C.G.S.130A-310.35{a)requires recordation of a Notice of Brownfields Property ("Notice")that identifies any restrictions on the current and future use ofa Brownfields Property thatare necessary or useful to maintain the level of protection appropriate for the designated current or future use of the property and that are designated in a Brownfields Agreement pertaining to the property.This survey plat constitutes one of two components of the Notice pertaining to the Brownfields Property depicted on this plat and recorded at the Iredell County Registerof Deeds'office.The other component ofthe Notice is a document,to which the Brownfields Agreement for the subject property is attached as ExhibitA;a reduced version ofthis survey platconstitutes Exhibit B to that document.The following Land Use Restrictions,excerpted verbatim from the Notice,are hereby imposed on the Brownfields Property and shall remain inforce in perpetuityunless canceled bythesecretary ofthe North carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources (or its successor in function),or his/her designee,after the hazards have been eliminated,pursuant to N.C.G.S.§130A-310.35(e): 1.No use may be madeof the Property other than industrial and,if DENR issues prior written approval,other purposes.For purposes ofthis restriction,"Industrial"refers to the manufacturing,processing, assembly,storage and distribution of goods or materials. 2.Surface water and groundwater at the Property may not be used for any purpose without the priorwritten approval of DENR. 3:Soil disturbances must be handled in accordance with an approved Soil Management Plan including subsequent DENR approved modifications to that plan. 4.No bUilding may be constructed on the Property and no existing building,defined as those depicted on the plat componentof this document,may be occupied until DENR determines in writing that a.the building would be sufficientty distant from the Property's groundwater and/or soil contamination that the building's users,public health and the environment will be protected from risk fromvapor intrusion related to said contamination;or . b.vapor mitigation measures are designed and installed or implemented to the written satisfaction of DENR in accordancewith a plan,including methodology{ies)for demonstrating performance ofthe vapor mitigation measures,approved in writing by DENR in advance,and DENR has been provided a reportthat includes photographs and a description of the installation and performance assessment of said measures: 5.None of the contaminants known to be present in the environmental media at the Property,including those appearing in Tables A,B and C ofthis pial,may be used orstored at the Property without the prior written approval of DENR,except in de minimis amounts for cleaning and other routine housekeeping activities. 6.The Property may not be used as an outdoor park orfor outdoor sports ofany kind without the priorwritten approval ofDENR. 7.The Property may not be used fur agriculture or grazing. 8.The Property may not be used as a playground,or for clhild care centers or schools without the priorwritten approval ofDENR. 9.The owner of any portion ofthe Property where any existing,or subsequently installed,DENR-approved monitoring well is damaged shall be responsible for repair ofany suchwells to DENR's written satisfaction and within a time period acceptable to DENR. 10.NeitherDENR,norany party conducting environmental assessment or remediation at the Property at the directionof.or pursuant to a permit,order or agreement issued or entered into by DENR.may be denied access to the Property for purposes of conducting such assessment or remediation,which is to be conducted using reasonable efforts to minimize interference with authorized uses ofthe Property. 11.During January of each year after the year in which the Notice is recorded,the owner ofany partof the Property as ofJanuary 1stofthatyear shall submita notarized land Use Restrictions Update ("LURU")to DENR,and to the chief public health and environmental officials of Stokes County,certifying that,as ofsaid.January 1st,the Notice ofBrownfields Property containing these land use restrictions remains recorded at the Stokes County Registerof Deeds office and the land use restrictions are being oompliedwith,and stating: a.the name,mailing address,telephone and facsimile numbers,and contact person's e-mail address ofthe owner submitting the LURU ifsaid owner acquired any part of the Property in fee during the previous calendar year;and b.the transferee's name,mailing address,telephone and facsimile numbers,and contact person's e-mail address,if said ownertransferred any part ofthe Property in fee dUring the previous calendar year. GROUNDWATER Groundwater contaminants in micrograms per liter (the equivalentofparts per billion),the standards for which are conlained in Title 15A of the North Carolina Administrative Code,Subchapter 2L,Rule .0202{2L).(January 1,2010 version): TableA -Groundwater Concentration AbcNe Unrestricted Use Standard Results in ugll Groundwater Sample Dateof Concentration Standard Contaminant Location sampling Exceeding.(ugIL) Standard (uglL) Perchloroethylene MW-1 1010712009 751 7 MW-1D 1010712010 125 MW-2 10/07/2010 52.4 MW-3 10/07/2010 23.4 MW-4 10/07/2010 660 - MW-6 12/0612009 228 MW-8 12/16/2009 107 MW-9 12/16/2009 108 SUB-SLAB SOIL GAS Sub-slab soil gas contaminants in miaograms per cubic meterofair.the screening levels for which are derivedfrom the Industrial Vapor Intrusion Screening Levels ofthe Inactive Hazardous Sites Branch of DENR's Superfund Section (July,2012 versian): Table B -Sub-slab Soil Gas Concentration Aboooe Industrial SCreening Level ReslIItsin uglm3 -PIl.OSPECTIVEDEVELOPERordOWNER- !:XHIBrT B to Ik Noli«ofBrownfields Proper~'-SURVEY PLAT Dynamic Real Estate Development,lLC 157 Industrial drive King,NC 27021 ",,.SICMltAlIO bAlE DRAWN BY FIBbPAR1Y 1:20,_fJ5I2II2012 ELC IELC ERICL au1Ili"R,LANDSURYEYINGoP.O.BOX ID7S 0- 1ClN6.NC 27021 PH.(336)969-4505 blssurw:~.i"ds"ea,,_ J'08/DW6.NO. 1232-3 SHEET 2012 \\\\\\1\11111/11 "",'"CAR 1 11//~9c-'\.0<.///~.fl....~t:.SSJ"·"./A~~""i'<'o o.,..',:-Y ~ /7?iJ :<l.SEAL~\~ L f,..6,.L-3462 :=~"~.k:= /"."'"~o ::::~.:~..-~A·...sU\t •••2.....~~"..."....//lC ~'$:.~ ,/1/L ~~,....""III •VC'".",'1/11111\\\\\\\ .\t>:?l'"A"Ued :for ~Jglet.t"..t.J,,",......,.-,..bwtIIL. Z-S <!·p-IJ and regi.~.r.d in BOOk.iL I~i ." Paee ~.~hJg;.;;Of D ,,~Nt • IndoorAir Sample Date of Concentration Industrial Contaminants Location Sampling Exceeding Saeening Screening Level , Level (uglm3) .(uglm3) 1,4 DichJoroibenzene 1A-2 8114/2012 3.1 1.1 1A-3 stl4/2012 3.7 1A-4 stl4l2012 3.8 1A-5 stl4l2012 2.8 Chloroform 1A-3 stl4l2012 2.0 0.53 Ethylbenzene 1A-5 stl4l2012 16 4.9 Trichloroethylene .1A-3 8f1412012 .5.90 1.76 Sub-slab Soil Gas Sample Date of Sampling Concentration Industrial Contaminant Location Exceeding 5aeening Screening Level Level 1 (uglm3)(uglm3) Tetrachloroethylene SG-1 311212012 5,600 350 SG-2 311212012 3,000 ,screening levels displayed fur non-earcinogens are for a hazardquotient equal to02.5aeening levels displayed fur carcinogens are for a 1.1lE-5 lifetime incremental cancer risk. ,Screening levels displayed for non-earcinogens are for a hazard quotient equal to 0.2.Screening levels displayed fur carcinogens are for a 1.0E-5lifetime incremental cancer risk.. INDOORAIR Indoor air contaminant screening levels in micrograms percubic meterofair,the screening.levels for which are derived from the Industrial Vapor Intrusion Screening Levels ofthe Inactive Hazardous Sites Branch ofDENR's Superfund Section (July,2012version): Table C -IndoorAir Concentration Above Industrial SCreening Level Rest*:in uglm3 Feb 05,2013 10:36 am 00011 0197 0197 00616 FILED STOKES COUNTY KATHY YOUNG REGISTER OF DEEDS FILED' AT BOOK START PAGE END PAGE INSTRUMENT # ~ NC CQUNlY S1OICE5 -TITlj;SOURCE- DB 634,PG 1000 PIN 5991.()7-&-2808 1\~r:."..~forlhe purposes of N.C.G.5.§13OA-310.35 uf~.~pe*~~"h I ~\~ DM!Iion ofWaste Managements_of North Carolina eo..tyofWake lQWN5HIP YADIaN Appendix E Grading Plan for Soil Borrow Source Appendix F Historic Aerial Photographs for Soil Borrow Source STOKES COUNTY PIN: 6901391053.000PEACHTREE LANEREVISION NO. 0 JOB NO. DMM-001 DATE: 6-30-21 APPENDIX: D-4 LEGEND BORROW SOURCE PROPERTY BOUNDARY PARCEL LINE 3921 Sunset Ridge Road, Suite 301Raleigh, North Carolina 27607919-847-4241(p) 919-847-4261(f) License # C-1269 / #C-245 Geology NOTES: 1. AERIAL IMAGERY OBTAINED FROM GOOGLE EARTH PRO SERVICES. 2. BASE DATA OBTAINED FROM STOKES COUNTY GIS (2018). BORROW SOURCE LOCATION MAP HISTORICAL AERIAL (1998) CAROLINA MEDICAL ELECTRONICS 157 INDUSTRIAL DRIVE KINGS, NORTH CAROLINA M:\AAA_DRAFTING\DMM\DMM-001\Figures_20210630.dwg, APP-4, 7/1/2021 9:36:13 AM, shaynes STOKES COUNTY PIN: 6901391053.000PEACHTREE LANEREVISION NO. 0 JOB NO. DMM-001 DATE: 6-30-21 APPENDIX: D-3 LEGEND BORROW SOURCE PROPERTY BOUNDARY PARCEL LINE 3921 Sunset Ridge Road, Suite 301Raleigh, North Carolina 27607919-847-4241(p) 919-847-4261(f) License # C-1269 / #C-245 Geology NOTES: 1. AERIAL IMAGERY OBTAINED FROM GOOGLE EARTH PRO SERVICES. 2. BASE DATA OBTAINED FROM STOKES COUNTY GIS (2018). BORROW SOURCE LOCATION MAP HISTORICAL AERIAL (2005) CAROLINA MEDICAL ELECTRONICS 157 INDUSTRIAL DRIVE KINGS, NORTH CAROLINA M:\AAA_DRAFTING\DMM\DMM-001\Figures_20210630.dwg, APP-3, 7/1/2021 9:35:17 AM, shaynes STOKES COUNTY PIN: 6901391053.000PEACHTREE LANEREVISION NO. 0 JOB NO. DMM-001 DATE: 6-30-21 APPENDIX: D-2 LEGEND BORROW SOURCE PROPERTY BOUNDARY PARCEL LINE 3921 Sunset Ridge Road, Suite 301Raleigh, North Carolina 27607919-847-4241(p) 919-847-4261(f) License # C-1269 / #C-245 Geology NOTES: 1. AERIAL IMAGERY OBTAINED FROM GOOGLE EARTH PRO SERVICES. 2. BASE DATA OBTAINED FROM STOKES COUNTY GIS (2018). BORROW SOURCE LOCATION MAP HISTORICAL AERIAL (2012) CAROLINA MEDICAL ELECTRONICS 157 INDUSTRIAL DRIVE KINGS, NORTH CAROLINA M:\AAA_DRAFTING\DMM\DMM-001\Figures_20210630.dwg, APP-2, 7/1/2021 9:34:25 AM, shaynes STOKES COUNTY PIN: 6901391053.000PEACHTREE LANEREVISION NO. 0 JOB NO. DMM-001 DATE: 6-30-21 APPENDIX: D-1 LEGEND BORROW SOURCE PROPERTY BOUNDARY PARCEL LINE 3921 Sunset Ridge Road, Suite 301Raleigh, North Carolina 27607919-847-4241(p) 919-847-4261(f) License # C-1269 / #C-245 Geology NOTES: 1. AERIAL IMAGERY OBTAINED FROM GOOGLE EARTH PRO SERVICES. 2. BASE DATA OBTAINED FROM STOKES COUNTY GIS (2018). BORROW SOURCE LOCATION MAP HISTORICAL AERIAL (2020) CAROLINA MEDICAL ELECTRONICS 157 INDUSTRIAL DRIVE KINGS, NORTH CAROLINA M:\AAA_DRAFTING\DMM\DMM-001\Figures_20210630.dwg, APP-1, 7/1/2021 9:33:28 AM, shaynes