Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout8003_Rowan_MSWLF_CDLF_WQMP_FID1576665_20210412GOLDER REPORT WATER QUALITY MONITORING PLAN Rowan County Landfill, Permit No. 80-03 Rowan County, North Carolina Submitted to: Jaclynne Drummond NC Division of Waste Management Solid Waste Section 2090 US Highway 70 Swannanoa, NC 28778 Ci ihmittarl hv- April 12, 2021 Distribution List Caleb Sinclair, Rowan County Environmental Management, 1102 N Long Street Extension East Spencer, NC 28039, caleb.sinclair@rowancountync.gov Jeff Boyd, Landfill Manager, 789 Campbell Road, Woodleaf, NC 27054, (704) 278-2211 Mike Plummer, PE, HDR, 440 South Church Street, Suite 1000 Charlotte, NC 28202, (704) 338 6843, michael.plummer@hdrinc.com (electronic copy) 20140083.400 4 GOLDER April 12, 2021 20140083.400 Table of Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION.............................................................................................................................................4 1.1 Site Description....................................................................................................................................4 1.2 Site Geology and Hydrogeology..........................................................................................................4 2.0 GROUNDWATER MONITORING SYSTEM...................................................................................................5 2.1 Monitoring Well Network......................................................................................................................5 2.2 Monitoring Well Construction...............................................................................................................6 2.3 Monitoring Well Development..............................................................................................................7 2.4 Maintenance and Recordkeeping........................................................................................................7 2.5 Monitoring Well Decommissioning.......................................................................................................7 3.0 GROUNDWATER MONITORING PROGRAM...............................................................................................8 3.1 Detection Monitoring............................................................................................................................8 3.1.1 Sampling Frequency.......................................................................................................................8 3.1.2 Establishment of Background Data.................................................................................................8 3.1.3 Evaluation of Detection Monitoring Data........................................................................................8 3.2 Assessment Monitoring........................................................................................................................9 3.2.1 MSW Unit........................................................................................................................................9 3.2.2 C&D Unit.......................................................................................................................................10 3.3 Evaluation and Reporting of Monitoring Data....................................................................................11 4.0 GROUNDWATER SAMPLING METHODOLOGY.......................................................................................11 4.1 Sample Collection..............................................................................................................................11 4.1.1 Sampling Frequency.....................................................................................................................11 4.1.2 Static Water Elevations.................................................................................................................11 4.1.3 Well Evacuation............................................................................................................................12 4.1.3.1 Low -Flow Procedures................................................................................................................12 4.1.3.2 Standard Evacuation Procedures..............................................................................................13 4.1.3.3 Collection...................................................................................................................................14 4.1.3.4 Decontamination........................................................................................................................14 GOLDER ii April 12, 2021 20140083.400 4.2 Sample Preservation and Handling...................................................................................................14 4.3 Chain -of -Custody Program................................................................................................................15 4.3.1 Sample Labels..............................................................................................................................15 4.3.2 Sample Seal..................................................................................................................................15 4.3.3 Field Logbook................................................................................................................................15 4.3.4 Chain -of -Custody Record.............................................................................................................16 4.4 Analytical Procedures........................................................................................................................16 4.5 Quality Assurance and Quality Control Program...............................................................................17 5.0 STATISTICAL METHODS............................................................................................................................17 6.0 SURFACE WATER MONITORING (RULE.0602).......................................................................................18 7.0 REFERENCES..............................................................................................................................................18 TABLE Table 1 Summary of Groundwater Monitoring Well Construction Information FIGURES Figure 1 Water Quality Monitoring Plan Figure 2 Typical Groundwater Monitoring Well Schematic APPENDIX APPENDIX A REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS GOLDER iii April 12, 2021 20140083.400 1.0 INTRODUCTION This Water Quality Monitoring Plan (WQMP) will serve as a guidance document for collecting and analyzing groundwater and surface water samples, evaluating the associated analytical results, and monitoring for any potential releases to the uppermost aquifer from the Rowan County Landfill, Permit No. 80-03, located in Rowan County, North Carolina (NC). The WQMP complies with NC Solid Waste Management Regulations (SWMR) Subchapter 13B .1630 through .1637 as part of the updated permit application for the active municipal solid waste (MSW) facility and section .0544 through .0545 for the closed construction and demolition (C&D) facility. The C&D facility closed in 2008. This Plan also addresses the requirements for surface water monitoring specified in Rule .0602. The pertinent geologic and hydrogeologic characteristics of the site, as described in the Design Hydrogeologic Report for the Cell IV expansion of the Rowan County Landfill, prepared by Buxton Environmental, Inc., and previous water quality monitoring reports prepared by Golder Associates NC, Inc. (Golder) are summarized below. Site Description The location of the facility is shown on the inlay on Figure 1. As presented, the Rowan County solid waste facility is located approximately 1.5 miles southeast of the town of Woodleaf on Campbell Road, Rowan County, NC. The landfill facility covers approximately 375 acres of land and is bounded to the north by Campbell Road, Second Creek and woodlands to the south and east and wooded, residential and agricultural properties to the west. Surrounding land use is primarily rural residential, agricultural, or undeveloped and wooded. Access to the facility is via the drive off of Campbell Road to the north. The facility is comprised of an active Subtitle D MSW unit, a closed C&D unit, and a closed land clearing inert debris (LCID) unit (Figure 1). Topographic elevations at the facility range from approximately 766 feet above mean sea level (AMSL) east of the existing scale house to approximately 635 feet AMSL at the edge of Second Creek along the southern property boundary. Surface drainage from the landfill and surrounding areas is directed by one of the two main drainage features that drain into Second Creek, which flows from the southwest to the northeast (S&ME October 2005). Groundwater monitoring at the facility was initiated in December 1989 under the Detection Monitoring Program for MSW landfills. 1.2 Site Geology and Hydrogeology Geologically, the facility is located within the Charlotte Belt of the Piedmont Physiographic Province of NC (NCGS 1985). The Charlotte Belt is composed of Precambrian and Paleozoic bedrock, which is dominantly plutonic with plutons ranging from granite to gabbro. The oldest rocks in the Charlotte Belt are mafic gneisses, amphibolites, metagabbros and metavolcanic rocks, with lesser amounts of biotite gneiss, granitic gneiss, mica schist, quartzite, and ultramafic rocks. Mica schists and mica hornblende gneisses locally have been intruded by granite. The rocks underlying the facility consist of mostly diorite, gabbro, and granite (NCGS 1985). The uppermost groundwater beneath the facility is present in a shallow, unconfined aquifer comprised of partially weathered, fractured, meta -volcanic rock. Groundwater occurs at depths ranging from near ground surface in valleys to more than 100 feet below grade on steep hills (S&ME October 2005). Depth -to -water measurements obtained during the January 2020 monitoring event were used to prepare a groundwater surface contour map presented as an overlay on Figure 1 (Golder March 2020). GOLDER April 12, 2021 20140083.400 As presented, the groundwater flow in the uppermost aquifer beneath the site is to the southwest toward Second Creek. The groundwater surface contour map and interpreted flow directions are consistent with previously submitted groundwater surface contour maps for this facility. Historically, the average estimated linear groundwater flow velocity for the subsurface at the facility is around 300 feet per year. The range of groundwater flow is expected to vary depending on the topographic and hydrogeologic conditions. 2.0 GROUNDWATER MONITORING SYSTEM The following sections present the proposed monitoring well network for the active MSW landfill unit and the closed C&D landfill unit, along with specifications associated with installing, developing, maintaining, and decommissioning facility monitoring wells. The proposed well locations are selected to yield groundwater samples representative of the conditions in the uppermost aquifer underlying the facility, and to monitor for potential releases from each landfill unit. Groundwater monitoring wells shall be sampled during the active life of the landfill as well as the post -closure period, in accordance with Rule .1630 and .0544 of the NC SWMR. 2.1 Monitoring Well Network The proposed monitoring network as shown on Figure 1 is designed to monitor for potential releases to the uppermost aquifer from the MSW and C&D units. Existing monitoring wells MW-9 and MW-16 are the background compliance wells for the MSW unit, which are located upgradient of the MSW unit. Similarly, well MW-17 is the background compliance well for the C&D unit. The need for additional background wells will be evaluated based on analytical results, if appropriate. The active MSW landfill monitoring network is currently comprised of 13 downgradient monitoring wells, which monitor the uppermost aquifer beneath the facility: MW-1, MW-7, MW-11, MW-12, MW-13, MW-20, MW-23, MW-23A, MW-24R, MW-25, MW-26, MW-27, and MW-28R. In addition, monitoring wells MW-6, MW-27A, and MW-28 are monitored during each semi-annual sampling event for water levels only. Well MW-23A is proposed for water levels only during this plan revision. Well MW-23 is more representative of the uppermost aquifer as it is screened within saprolite/soils and MW-23A is screened within partially weathered rock. Based on over 15 years of water quality monitoring data, the wells are geochemically similar and therefore this monitoring redundancy is unnecessary. A French Drain that lies within the Phase III footprint is also monitored. Two downgradient monitoring wells (MW-18R and MW-19) monitor the C&D landfill. Additional downgradient wells will be added to the monitoring network, if needed, as future phases are constructed. Refer to the table below for a summary of proposed monitoring wells. Pointr nitoring MSW Facility MW-9 Upgradient MW-16 Upgradient MW-1 Downgradient GOLDER April 12, 2021 20140083.400 PointDonitoring MW-7 Downgradient MW-11 Downgradient MW-12 Downgradient MW-13 Downgradient MW-20 Downgradient MW-23 Downgradient MW-24R Downgradient MW-25 Downgradient MW-26 Downgradient MW-27 Downgradient MW-28R Downgradient French Drain Downgradient MW-6 Water Levels Only MW-23A Water Levels Only MW-27A Water Levels Only MW-28 Water Levels Only C&D Facility MW-17 Upgradient MW-18R Downgradient MW-19 Downgradient 2.2 Monitoring Well Construction The well completion details for the existing groundwater compliance monitoring wells are included in Table 1. Drilling and installation of any new monitoring wells will be performed in accordance with the specifications outlined in 15A NCAC Subchapter 2C, Section .0100. A typical groundwater monitoring well schematic is provided as Figure 2. Further guidance is provided in the Draft and US EPA Region 4 Science and Ecosystem Support Division (SESD)'s Design and Installation of Monitoring Wells (February 2008). Drilling and well installation activities will be conducted in under the supervision of a licensed geologist. New wells will be located by a licensed surveyor to within +0.1 foot on the horizontal plane and +0.01 foot vertically in reference to existing GOLDER April 12, 2021 20140083.400 survey points. A boring log, well construction log, groundwater monitoring network map, well installation certification, and survey data will be submitted to the Solid Waste Section (SWS) upon completion. 2.3 Monitoring Well Development Newly constructed wells will be developed to remove particulates present in the well due to construction activities, and to interconnect the well with the aquifer. Groundwater monitoring wells will be developed to reduce turbidity as outlined in US EPA Region 4 Science and Ecosystem Support Division (SESD)'s Groundwater Sampling Operating Procedure (April 2017). Development of new monitoring wells will be performed no sooner than 24 hours after well construction. Wells may be developed with disposable bailers, a well development pump, or other approved method. A surge block may be used as a means of assessing the integrity of the well screen and riser. In the event a pump is employed, the design of the pump will be such that any groundwater that has come into contact with air is not allowed to drain back into the well. In general, each well will be developed until sediment - free water with stabilized field parameters (i.e., temperature, pH, and specific conductance) is obtained. Well development equipment (i.e., bailers, pumps, surge blocks) and any additional equipment that contacts subsurface formations will be decontaminated prior to on -site use, between consecutive on -site uses, and/or between consecutive well installations. The purge water will be disposed of on the ground surface at least 10 feet downgradient of the monitoring well, unless field characteristics suggest the water will need to be disposed of otherwise. If field characteristics suggest, the purge water will be containerized and disposed of by other approved means. Samples withdrawn from the facility's monitoring wells should be clay- and silt -free; therefore, existing wells may require re -development from time to time based upon observed turbidity levels during sampling activities. If re- development of an existing monitoring well is required, it will be performed in a manner similar to that used for a new well. 2.4 Maintenance and Recordkeeping The monitoring wells will be used and maintained in accordance with design specifications throughout the life of the monitoring program. Routine well maintenance will include inspection and correction/repair of, as necessary, identification labels, concrete aprons, locking caps and locks, and access to the wells. Should it be determined that background or compliance monitoring wells no longer provide samples representative of the quality of groundwater passing the relevant point of compliance, the SWS will be notified. The owner will re-evaluate the monitoring network, and provide recommendations to the SWS for modifying, rehabilitating, decommissioning, or installing replacement or additional monitoring wells, as appropriate. Laboratory analytical results will be submitted to the SWS semi-annually. Analytical data, calculations, and other relevant groundwater monitoring records will be kept throughout the active life of the facility and the post -closure care period, including notices and reports of any NC (2L) Groundwater Protection Standard or Interim Maximum Allowable Concentration (IMAC) exceedances, resampling notifications, and re -sampling results. 2.5 Monitoring Well Decommissioning Piezometers and wells installed within the MSW waste footprint will be properly decommissioned in accordance with the procedures for permanent decommissioning, as described in 15A NCAC 2C Rule .0113(b). The piezometers and wells will be progressively decommissioned as necessary to complete landfill construction activities. The piezometers and wells that are within the proposed footprint will be overdrilled to remove well GOLDER April 12, 2021 20140083.400 construction materials, and then grouted with a cement-bentonite grout. Other piezometers and wells that will potentially interfere with clearing and construction activities will be grouted in place without overdrilling with a cement-bentonite grout and removing surface features, such as concrete aprons, protective casings, and stick- ups. In each case, the bentonite content of the cement-bentonite grout shall be approximately 5%, and a tremie pipe will be used to ensure that grout is continuously placed from the bottom of the borehole/monitoring well upward. If a monitoring well becomes unusable during the monitoring period of the landfill, the well will be decommissioned in accordance with the procedures described above. Approval from the SWS will be obtained prior to decommissioning any monitoring well. For each monitoring well decommissioned, the following information will be provided to the SWS in a report sealed by a licensed geologist: the monitoring well name, a description of the procedure by which the monitoring well was decommissioned, the date when the monitoring well was considered to be taken out of service, and the date when the monitoring well was decommissioned. 3.0 GROUNDWATER MONITORING PROGRAM The following sections present the monitoring requirements for this facility. 3.1 Detection Monitoring Groundwater samples for the MSW unit will be analyzed semi-annually for the Appendix I list of constituents as defined in Rule .1633 (i.e., Detection Monitoring Program), during the life of the facility and the post -closure care period. Groundwater samples for the closed C&D unit will be analyzed semi-annually for the constituents listed in NC Appendix I plus mercury, chloride, manganese, sulfate, iron, specific conductance, pH, temperature, alkalinity, and total dissolved solids (TDS) as defined in Rule .0544(b)(1)(D) under Detection Monitoring, during the post - closure care period. The current SWS analyte list is included in Appendix A. Note that analytical methods should be consistent with SWS-846 approved methodology. 3.1.1 Sampling Frequency Groundwater samples will be collected semi-annually and analyzed for constituents outlined above along with required field parameters, including but not limited to, pH, conductivity, and temperature. If either the MSW or C&D units must progress to Assessment Monitoring, notification and sampling will be conducted according to the schedule specified in Rules .1634 and .0545. 3.1.2 Establishment of Background Data During each phase of facility development, a minimum of four independent groundwater samples will be collected from the newly installed monitoring wells (other than replacement wells) or as specified in the permit. Samples collected from these wells will be analyzed for the detection monitoring constituents. The intent of background sampling is to collect data to more accurately reflect the natural fluctuations that may occur with these constituents. The data will be submitted to the SWS after completion of the fourth background sampling event. 3.1.3 Evaluation of Detection Monitoring Data During the Detection Monitoring Program, the reported constituent concentrations from downgradient compliance wells will be compared to the groundwater protection standards or GPS (i.e., NC 2L Standards and IMACs). If inorganic Detection Monitoring parameters are determined to be above the groundwater protection standards, the reported constituent concentrations from downgradient compliance wells will be statistically compared to the site- GOLDER April 12, 2021 20140083.400 specific background standard using approved statistical procedures in .1632(g), (h) and (i) to determine if a release has occurred. If a constituent is detected above both its groundwater quality standard and its site -specific background standard, the following procedures will be followed for the MSW unit: 1. Notify SWS within 14 days of this finding, report to the Division and place a notice in the operating record indicating which constituents have exceeded groundwater protection standards. 2. Within 90 days, establish an Assessment Monitoring Program meeting the requirements of Rule .1634 or 0545 as appropriate, except as discussed below. If a constituent is detected above both its groundwater quality standard and its site -specific background standard at the C&D unit, the following procedures will be followed in accordance with Rule .0545: 1. Within 30 days, submit an Assessment Monitoring Work Plan to the SWS for review. 2. Upon the SWS's approval of the Assessment Monitoring Work Plan, initiate Assessment Monitoring. The data may be evaluated within 90 days following the exceedance, and wells may be resampled if appropriate, to determine if the concentration resulted from an error in sampling, analysis, statistical evaluation, or natural variation in groundwater quality; or a source other than the facility. If it can be demonstrated that one of these factors occurred, a report [an Alternate Source Demonstration (ASD)] certified by a licensed geologist or engineer will be submitted to the SWS within 90 days of identifying the suspect GPS and/or statistical increase. A copy of this report will be placed in the operating record. If the SWS approves the ASD, the Detection Monitoring Program will be resumed with the required semi-annual sampling and analysis. If SWS does not accept the demonstration, Assessment Monitoring will be initiated. 3.2 Assessment Monitoring Assessment Monitoring is required for either waste unit whenever one or more detection monitoring constituents are detected at concentrations that exceed the GPS and no source of error or naturally occurring condition can be identified. If an error or naturally occurring condition cannot be identified Assessment Monitoring will be initiated at the MSW and C&D units as described below. 3.2.1 MSW Unit In accordance with Rule .1634. within 90 days of triggering the Assessment Monitoring Program, and annually thereafter, groundwater will be sampled for analysis of the NC Appendix II list of constituents. A minimum of one groundwater sample will be collected from each downgradient well and submitted for analysis during each Assessment Monitoring sampling event. However, the NCSWMR allow for petitions to the SWS for an appropriate subset of wells or a reduction in the NC Appendix II sampling list. If any NC Appendix II constituents are detected in groundwater from the downgradient wells, a minimum of four independent samples will be collected from each background and downgradient well to establish background concentrations for the detected NC Appendix II constituents. Within 14 days after receipt of the initial or subsequent sampling analytical data, a report identifying the detected NC Appendix II constituents will be submitted to the SWS, and a notice will be placed in the operating record. 4 GOLDER April 12, 2021 20140083.400 Background concentrations of any detected NC Appendix II constituents will be established and reported to the SWS. Within 90 days, and on at least a semi-annual basis thereafter, the wells will be sampled and analyzed for the NC Appendix I list plus any additional detected Appendix II constituents. An analytical results report of each sampling event will be submitted to the SWS and placed in the facility operational record. The SWS will determine whether site -specific GPS must be established for the facility and may specify a more appropriate alternate sampling frequency for repeated sampling and analysis for the full set of NC Appendix II constituents. Groundwater monitoring will continue in one of two ways, based on the results of the Assessment Monitoring statistical analyses: 1) If the NC Appendix II constituents are at or less than approved GPS for two consecutive sampling events, the facility may resume Detection Monitoring with the approval of SWS. 2) If one or more NC Appendix II constituents are detected at statistically significant concentrations in excess of the approved GPS, and no source of error can be identified, within 14 days the SWS will be notified, a notice will be placed in the operating record, and all appropriate local government officials will be notified. The facility will proceed to a characterization of the nature and extent of the release (Rule .1634(f)(1)). Next, the facility operator will initiate an Assessment of Corrective Measures and corrective action and proceed according to Rules .1635 through .1637. If the facility proceeds to corrective action, a Corrective Action Monitoring Plan will be submitted to the SWS with the Corrective Action Plan. 3.2.2 C&D Unit After triggering the Assessment Monitoring, water quality monitoring will be performed in accordance with the approved Assessment Monitoring Work Plan, which will include at a minimum one sampling event where monitoring wells are sampled for NC Appendix II constituents. A minimum of one groundwater sample will be collected from each downgradient groundwater monitoring well and submitted for analysis If any Appendix II constituents are detected in groundwater from the downgradient wells, a minimum of 4 independent samples will be collected from each background and downgradient groundwater monitoring well to establish background concentrations for the detected NC Appendix II constituents. After approval of the Assessment Monitoring Work Plan and completion of an initial complete NC Appendix II sampling event, and on at least a semi-annual basis thereafter, the wells will be sampled and analyzed for the Appendix I list plus any additional detected Appendix II constituents. An analytical results report of each sampling event will be submitted to the SWS and placed in the facility operational record. The SWS will determine whether site -specific GPS must be established for the facility and may specify a more appropriate alternate sampling frequency for repeated sampling and analysis for the full set of NC Appendix II constituents. Groundwater monitoring will continue in one of two ways, based on the results of the assessment monitoring statistical analyses: 1) If the NC Appendix II constituents are at or less than background values using approved statistical procedures for two consecutive sampling events, the facility may resume detection monitoring with the approval of SWS. 4 GOLDER 10 April 12, 2021 20140083.400 2) If one or more NC Appendix II constituents are detected at statistically significant concentrations in excess of the approved GPS, and no source of error can be identified, a notice will be placed in the operating record, and all appropriate local government officials will be notified. The facility will proceed to a characterization of the nature and extent of the release. If the facility proceeds to corrective action, an Assessment of Corrective Measures will be submitted to the SWS and a remedy will be selected. 3.3 Evaluation and Reporting of Monitoring Data Reports will be submitted electronically with analytical and field data submitted in the required formats, and be accompanied by the required Environmental Monitoring Form, which will be signed and sealed by a licensed geologist in the State of NC. A copy of this form is also included in Appendix A. The reported constituent concentrations from downgradient compliance wells will be compared to background values, NC 2L Standards and/or IMACs using a value -to -value comparison. Any exceedances will be identified in the semi-annual submittals to the SWS and 14-day notifications for new exceedances submitted for the MSW facility. 4.0 GROUNDWATER SAMPLING METHODOLOGY Groundwater samples will be collected in accordance with Rules .1632 or .0544/.0545 this Water Quality Monitoring Plan. The most current US EPA Region 4 SESD guidance will be utilized for sampling, as applicable, including: Management of Investigation Derived Waste (May 2020), Field Equipment Cleaning and Decontamination (June 2020), and Groundwater Sampling Operating Procedure (April 2017). Procedures for well purging, sample withdrawal, decontamination methods, and chain -of -custody procedures are outlined below. Field parameter measurements will be submitted electronically to the SWS in a format consistent with SWS policies. A 1 Sample Collection The procedures for collecting groundwater samples are presented below. The background wells for the MSW unit (MW 9 and MW-16) and C&D unit (MW-17) will be sampled first, followed by the downgradient compliance wells. The downgradient wells will be sampled so that the most contaminated well, if one is identified from the previous sampling event, will be sampled last. 4.1.1 Sampling Frequency The above -mentioned samples will be collected on a semi-annual basis throughout the life of the facility and post - closure care period. 4.1.2 Static Water Elevations The static groundwater level will be measured with an electronic water level indicator, to the nearest 0.01 foot, in each well prior to sampling. Static groundwater elevations will be calculated from groundwater depth measurements and top of casing elevations. A reference point will be marked on the top of casing of each well to ensure the same measuring point is used each time static groundwater levels are measured. If a monitoring well contains a dedicated pump, the depth -to -water shall be measured without removing the pump. Depth -to -bottom measurements should be taken from the well construction data and updated when pumps are removed for maintenance. GOLDER 11 April 12, 2021 4.1.3 Well Evacuation 20140083.400 Existing monitoring wells in the current compliance network contain dedicated bladder pumps and pumps will be installed in any new wells. The preferred well evacuation and sampling procedure for the site is a low -flow purge (micropurge) and sample methodology and procedure. Standard evacuation and sample methodology and procedures are also outlined below based on the US EPA Groundwater Sampling Operating Procedure (April 2017), as an alternate. 4.1.3.1 Low -Flow Procedures Monitoring wells may be purged and sampled using the low -flow sampling method in accordance with the procedures presented below. Depth -to -water measurements will be obtained using an electronic water level indicator capable of recording the depth to an accuracy of 0.01 foot. A determination of whether or not the water table is located within the screened interval of the well will be made. If the water table is not within the screened interval, the amount of drawdown that can be achieved before the screen is intersected will be calculated and the amount of drawdown should be minimized to keep the screen from being exposed. The water level should not fall within 1 foot of the top of the well screen. If the water table is within the screened interval, total drawdown should not exceed 1 foot so as to minimize the amount of aeration and turbidity. If the purging equipment is non -dedicated, the equipment will be lowered into the well, taking care to minimize the disturbance to the water column. If conditions (i.e., water column height and well yield) allow, the pump will be placed in the uppermost portion of the water column (minimum of 18 inches of pump submergence is recommended). The minimum volume/time period for obtaining independent water quality parameter measurements (WQPM) will be determined. The minimum volume/time period is determined based on the stabilized flow rate and the amount of volume in the pump and the discharge tubing (alternatively, the volume of the flow cell can be used, provided it is greater than the volume of the pump and discharge tubing). Volume of the bladder pump should be obtained from the manufacturer. Volume of the discharge tubing is as follows: 3/8-inch inside diameter tubing: 20 milliliters per foot 1/4-inch inside diameter tubing:10 milliliters per foot 3/16-inch inside diameter tubing: 5 milliliters per foot Once the volume of the flow -cell or the pump and the discharge tubing has been calculated, the well purge will begin. The flow rate should be based on historical data for that well (if available) and should not exceed 500 milliliters per minute. The initial round of WQPM should be recorded and the flow rate adjusted until drawdown in the well stabilizes. Water levels should be measured periodically to maintain a stabilized water level. If the purge rate has been reduced to 100 milliliters or less and the head level in the well continues to decline, the required water samples should be collected following stabilization of the WQPM, based on the criteria presented below. If neither the head level nor the WQPM stabilize, a passive sample should be collected. Passive sampling is defined as sampling before WQMP have stabilized if the well yield is low enough that the well will purge dry at the lowest possible purge rate (generally less than 100 milliliters per minute). GOLDER 12 April 12, 2021 20140083.400 WQPM stabilization is defined as follows: pH (+/- 0.2 S.U.), conductance (+/- 5% of reading), temperature (+/- 0.20Celsius or C), and dissolved oxygen or DO [+/- 20% of reading or 0.2 milligrams per liter or mg/L (whichever is greater)]. Oxidation reduction potential (ORP) will be measured and ideally should also fall within +/- 10 mV of reading; however, this is not a required parameter. At a minimum, turbidity measurements should also be recorded at the beginning of purging, following the stabilization of the WQPM, and following the collection of the samples. The optimal turbidity range for micropurging is 10 Nephelometric Turbidity Units (NTU) or less. Turbidity measurements above 10 NTU are generally indicative of an excessive purge rate or natural conditions related to excessive fines in the aquifer matrix. Stabilization of the WQPM should occur in most wells within five to six rounds of measurements. If stabilization does not occur following the removal of a purge volume equal to three well volumes, a passive sample will be collected. The direct -reading equipment used at each well will be calibrated in the field according to the manufacturer's specifications prior to each day's use and checked at a minimum at the end of each sampling day. Calibration information should be documented in the instrument's calibration logbook and the field book. Each well is to be sampled immediately following stabilization of the WQPM. The sampling flow rate must be maintained at a rate that is less than or equal to the purging rate. For volatile organic compounds (VOCs), lower sampling rates (100 - 200 milliliters/minute) should be used. Final field parameter readings should be recorded at the time of sampling. 4.1.3.2 Standard Evacuation Procedures Monitoring wells may be evacuated with a submersible pump or a disposable bailer. If the pump is used for multiple wells, it and any other non -dedicated equipment will be decontaminated before use and between use at each well. A low yield well (one that yields less than 0.5 gallon per minute) will be purged so that water is removed from the bottom of the screened interval. Low -yield wells will be evacuated to dryness once. However, at no time will a well be evacuated to dryness if the recharge rate causes the formation water to vigorously cascade down the sides of the screen and cause an accelerated loss of VOCs. Upon recharging of the well and no longer than 24 hours from completing the purge, the first sample will be field-tested for pH, temperature, specific conductivity, and turbidity. Samples will then be collected and containerized in the order of the volatilization sensitivity of the target constituents. A high -yield well (one that yields 0.5 gallon per minute or more) will be purged so that water is drawn down from above the screen in the uppermost part of the water column to ensure that fresh water from the formation will move upward in the screen. If a pump is used for purging, a high yield well should be purged at less than 4 gallons per minute to prevent further well development. A minimum of three casing volumes will be evacuated from each well prior to sampling. An alternative purge will be considered complete if the monitoring well goes dry before removing the calculated minimum purge volume. The well casing volume for a 2-inch well will be calculated using the following formula: Vc (gallons) = 0.163 x hW where: GOLDER 13 April 12, 2021 Vc = volume in the well casing = (dc2/4) x 3.14 x hW x 7.48 gallons/cubic foot dc = casing diameter in feet (dc = 0.167) hW = height of the water column (i.e., well depth minus depth to water) 20140083.400 The purge water will be disposed of on the ground surface at least 10 feet downgradient of the monitoring well, unless field characteristics suggest the water will need to be disposed of otherwise. The bailers will be equipped with a check valve and bottom -emptying device. The bailer will be lowered gently into the well to minimize the possibility of degassing the water. Field measurements of temperature, pH, specific conductance, and turbidity will be made before and after sample collection as a check on the stability of the groundwater sampled over time. Precautions to minimize turbidity will be taken. The direct -reading equipment used at each well will be calibrated in the field according to the manufacturer's specifications prior to each day's use and checked at a minimum at the end of each sampling day. Calibration information should be documented in the instrument's calibration logbook and the field book. 4.1.3.3 Collection Samples will be collected and containerized in the order described below. ■ VOCs (SW- 846 Method 8260) ■ Semi -Volatile Organic Compounds (SW- 846 Method 8270) Herbicides (SW-846 Method 8151) Pesticides (SW- 846 Method 8080) Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs; SW-846 Method 8082) Cyanide and Sulfide Total Metals Field and General Chemistry Parameters (as applicable) Samples will be transferred directly from field sampling equipment into pre -preserved, laboratory -supplied containers. 4.1.3.4 Decontamination Non -dedicated field equipment that is used for purging or sample collection shall be cleaned with a phosphate - free detergent, and triple -rinsed with distilled water. Any disposable tubing used with non -dedicated pumps should be discarded after use at each well. Clean, chemical -resistant nitrile gloves will be worn by sampling personnel during well evacuation and sample collection. Measures will be taken to prevent surface soils, which could introduce contaminants into the well. 4.2 Sample Preservation and Handling Upon containerizing groundwater samples, the samples will be packed into pre -chilled, ice -filled coolers and either hand -delivered or shipped overnight by a commercial carrier to a NC -certified laboratory for analysis. Sample GOLDER 14 April 12, 2021 20140083.400 preservation methods will be used to retard biological action and hydrolysis, as well as to reduce sorption effects. These methods will include chemical preservation, cooling/refrigeration at 4° C, and protection from light. 4.3 Chain -of -Custody Program The chain -of -custody program will allow for tracing sample possession and handling from the time of field collection through laboratory analysis. The chain -of -custody program includes sample labels, sample seal, field logbook, and chain -of -custody record. 4.3.1 Sample Labels Legible labels sufficiently durable to remain legible when wet will contain the following information: Site and sample identification number Monitoring well number or other location Date and time of collection Name of collector Parameters to be analyzed ■ Preservative, if applicable 4.3.2 Sample Seal The shipping container will be sealed to ensure that the samples have not been disturbed during transport to the laboratory. The tape is labeled with instructions to notify the shipper if the seal is broken prior to receipt at the laboratory. 4.3.3 Field Logbook The field logbook will contain sheets documenting the following information: Identification of the well Well depth Field meter calibration information Static water level depth and measurement technique Purge volume (given in gallons) ■ Time well was purged ■ Date and time of sample collection ■ Well sampling sequence ■ Types of sample containers used and sample identification numbers Preservative used Field analysis data and methods GOLDER 15 April 12, 2021 Field observations on sampling event Name of collector(s) ■ Climatic conditions including air temperatures and precipitation 4.3.4 Chain -of -Custody Record 20140083.400 The chain -of -custody record is required for tracing sample possession from time of collection to time of receipt at the laboratory. A chain -of -custody record will accompany each individual shipment. The record will contain the following information: ■ Sample destination and transporter ■ Sample identification numbers ■ Signature of collector ■ Date and time of collection ■ Sample type Identification of well Number of sample containers in shipping container ■ Parameters requested for analysis ■ Signature of person(s) involved in the chain of possession ■ Inclusive dates of possession ■ Internal temperature of shipping container upon opening in laboratory (noted by the laboratory) A copy of the completed chain -of -custody form will accompany the shipment and will be returned to the shipper after the shipping container reaches its destination. The chain -of -custody record will also be used as the analysis request sheet. 4.4 Analytical Procedures A laboratory certified by the North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (NC DEQ) will be utilized for analysis of the groundwater and surface water samples. Analyses will be performed in accordance with United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) SW-846 methods in accordance with the US EPA guidance document (US EPA 1997). The monitoring parameters are listed in Appendix A. Alternate SW-846 methods may be used if they have the same or lower reporting limits. The laboratory must report any detection of any constituent to the method detection limit (MDL) and identify the practical quantitation limit (PQL). The MDL should be at or below established groundwater and surface water standards, where applicable. The laboratory certificates -of -analyses shall, at a minimum, include the following information: Narrative: Must include a brief description of the sample group (number and type of samples, field and associated lab sample identification numbers, preparation and analytical methods used). The data reviewer shall also include a statement that all holding times and Quality Control (QC) criteria were met, samples GOLDER 16 April 12, 2021 20140083.400 were received intact and properly preserved, with a brief discussion of any deviations potentially affecting data usability. This includes, but is not limited to, test method deviation(s), holding time violations, out -of - control incidents occurring during the processing of QC or field samples and corrective actions taken, and repeated analyses and reasons for the re -analyses (including, for example, contamination, failing surrogate recoveries, matrix effects, or dilutions). The narrative shall be signed by the laboratory director or authorized laboratory representative, signifying that all statements are true to the best of the reviewer's knowledge, and that the data meet the data quality objectives as described in this plan (except as noted). One narrative is required for each sample group. Original Chain -of- Custody Form. Target Analyte List (TAL)/Target Compound List (TCL): The laboratory shall list all compounds for which the samples were analyzed. The TAL/TCL is typically included as part of the analytical reporting forms. ■ Dilution factors with a narrative of the sample results, including the reasons for the dilution (if any). ■ Blank Data: For organic analyses, the laboratory shall report the results of any method blanks, reagent blanks, trip blanks, field blanks, and any other blanks associated with the sample group. For inorganic analyses, the laboratory shall provide the results of any preparation or initial calibration blanks associated with the sample group. QC Summary: The laboratory will provide summary forms detailing laboratory QC sample results, which include individual recoveries and relative percent differences (if appropriate) for the following Quality Assurance (QA)/QC criteria: surrogates, Matrix Spike (MS) analyses, MS Duplicate analyses, Laboratory Control Standard (LCS), and sample duplicate analyses. QC control limits shall also be reported; if any QC limits are exceeded, a flag or footnote shall be placed to indicate the affected samples. Additional QA data and/or other pertinent data may be reported as requested by the owner/operator of the facility. 4.5 Quality Assurance and Quality Control Program A field blank may be collected and analyzed during each monitoring event to verify that the sample collection and handling process has not affected the quality of the samples. The field blank will be prepared in the field and exposed to the sampling environment. As with all other samples, the time of the blank exposure will be recorded so that the sampling sequence is documented. The field blank will be analyzed for the same list of constituents as the groundwater samples. The assessment of blank analysis results will be in general accordance with US EPA guidance documents (US EPA 1993 and 1994). No positive sample results will be relied upon unless the concentration of the compound in the sample exceeds ten times the amount in any blank for common laboratory contaminants, or five times the amount for other compounds. If necessary, re -sampling will be performed to confirm or refute suspect data; such re -sampling will occur within the individual compliance monitoring period. The "B" qualifier designates that the reported detection is considered to represent cross -contamination and that the reported constituent is not considered to be present in the sample at the reported concentration. 5.0 STATISTICAL METHODS Statistical analysis of groundwater monitoring data is not required by regulation for landfill compliance. However, it is allowed by regulation for the purposes of determining naturally occurring (i.e., background) concentrations of 4 GOLDER 17 April 12, 2021 20140083.400 constituents. If utilized, statistical evaluation of groundwater monitoring data will be performed in compliance with Rule .1632 (g), (h), and (i) and the US EPA's Statistical Analysis of Groundwater Monitoring Data at RCRA Facilities, Unified Guidance (March 2009). Statistics will not be utilized for the water quality and indicator parameters, which are collected for qualitative and informational purposes only. Intra-well statistical comparisons may be used to evaluate the inorganic groundwater data, if appropriate. Intra- well monitoring does not require background monitoring at upgradient wells or pooling of the data because water chemistry of a well is compared to itself over time. However, upgradient well(s) are useful for detecting any potential offsite influences on the monitoring network and will be monitored. Intra-well monitoring is generally preferable to inter -well monitoring for lined facilities because it eliminates the spatial component of natural groundwater chemistry variability; this spatial component can comprise a significant portion of the total variability that must be accounted for by the statistical methodology. SURFACE WATER MONITORING (RULE .0602) In accordance with Rule .0602 of the NCSWMR, surface water monitoring locations have been established to monitor surface water quality at the facility. Four surface water locations (SW-1 through SW-4) will be monitored at the MSW unit. An additional surface water location (SW-5) monitors surface water downstream of the C&D unit. The locations of monitoring locations are shown on Figure 1. The upstream monitoring point for both the MSW and C&D units (SW-1) is along Second Creek. Downstream monitoring points SW-3 and SW-4 are downstream monitoring locations along unnamed tributaries to Second Creek. Downstream monitoring point SW-5 monitors Second Creek downgradient of the C&D unit, and SW-2 monitors Second Creek downstream of both units near the property line. Samples will only be collected at each location if flowing water is observed during the sampling event. Samples will be collected in accordance with the US EPA SESD's Surface Water Sampling Operating Procedures (December 2016). ocation Upstream (Second Creek) Unit(s) Monitored MSW/C&D urface Water Monitoring Vpoint SW-1 SW-2 Downstream (Second Creek) MSW/C&D SW-3 Downstream (Unnamed Tributary) MSW SW-4 Downstream (Unnamed Tributary) MSW SW-5 Downstream (Second Creek) C&D The surface water monitoring points will be sampled semi-annually for analysis of NC Appendix I constituents, and pH, specific conductivity, and temperature. The results of the analysis of the surface water data will be submitted to the SWS at least semi-annually in conjunction with the groundwater data. Data will be compared to applicable NC surface water standards, and those comparisons will be included with each submittal. 7.0 REFERENCES The references cited below were used in the preparation of this report and may or may not be referenced in the text. GOLDER 18 April 12, 2021 20140083.400 Butler, R.J., and Secor, Jr., D.T., 1991, The Central Piedmont, in Horton, J. W., Jr., and Zullo, V.A., eds., The Geology of the Carolinas: The University of Tennessee Press, pp. 59-78. Buxton Environmental, Inc., September 2011, Design Hydrogeologic Report, Proposed Phase IV Landfill Subtitle D Municipal Solid Waste Landfill Expansion, Rowan County Landfill. Golder Associates NC, Inc., March 2020. Water Quality Monitoring Report, First Semi - Annual 2020 Sampling Event, Active Rowan County Landfill, Permit No. 80-03, Rowan County, North Carolina. NCGS, 1985. Geologic Map of North Carolina. Scale1:500,000. S&ME, October 2005. Water Quality Monitoring Plan —Rowan County Landfill, Woodleaf, NC. US EPA. 1996. Low -Flow (Minimal Drawdown) Ground -Water Sampling Procedures. Puls, Robert W. and Barcelona, Michael J. US EPA. 1993. Region III Modifications to Laboratory Data Validation Functional Guidelines for Evaluating Inorganic Analyses, EPA 540/R-01-008. April. US EPA, 1994. Region III Modifications to National Functional Guidelines for Organic Data Review Multi -Media, Multi -Concentration (OLM01.0-OLM00.9), EPA 540/R-99-008. September. US EPA. 1986. RCRA Ground Water Monitoring Technical Enforcement Guidance Document (TEGD). US EPA Region 4, 2008. Science and Ecosystem Support Division Design and Installation of Monitoring Wells. February US EPA Region 4, 2020. Science and Ecosystem Support Division Field Equipment Cleaning and Decontamination. June US EPA Region 4, 2017. Science and Ecosystem Support Division Groundwater Sampling Operating Procedures April US EPA Region 4, 2020. Science and Ecosystem Support Division Management of Investigation Derived Waste. May US EPA Region 4, 2016. Science and Ecosystem Support Division Surface Water Sampling Operating Procedures. December US EPA. 2009. Statistical Analysis of Groundwater Monitoring Data at RCRA Facilities, Unified Guidance, EPA 530-R-09-007. March US EPA. June 1997. SW-846 Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, Physical/Chemical Methods, Final Update III. 4 GOLDER 19 April 12, 2021 Professional Certification 20140083.400 The Water Quality Monitoring Plan for the Rowan County active MSW and closed C&D units at this facility has been prepared by a qualified geologist who is licensed to practice in the State of North Carolina. The plan has been prepared based on first-hand knowledge of site conditions and familiarity with North Carolina solid waste rules and industry standard protocol. This certification is made in accordance with North Carolina Solid Waste Regulations, indicating this Water Quality Monitoring Plan should provide early detection of any release of hazardous constituents to the uppermost aquifer, so as to be protective of public health and the environment. No other warranties, expressed or implied, are made. GOLDER ASSOCIATES NC, INC. Rachel P. Kirkman, PG Principal and Senior Consultant Not valid unless this document bears the seal of the above -mentioned licensed professional. Engineering Lic. No. C-28621Geology Lic. No_ C-399 Golder Associates NC, Inc. is a licensed user of the Golder trademark, and an associated operating entity. Golder and the G logo are trademarks of Golder Associates Corporation. h11p7.11golpara5svciales sharepoint.t.OmlSoesol 29mprojact files/6 IeChnzp1 worWphsse 400 environmental monitoring plan updalesMgmp rev2lrowan county 13003 wgmp 2021 ray.docx GOLDER 20 TABLE April 2021 Table 1 Summary of Groundwater Monitoring Well Construction Information Rowan County Landfill (Active MSW and Closed C&D Facilities) Permit No. 80-03 Project No. 20140083 Well Identification Northing Easting Date of Construction Ground Surface Elevation (ft AMSL) TOC Elevation (ft AMSL) Well Depth (ft bgs) Well Diameter (inches) Screened Interval (ft AMSL) Geology of Screened Interval Well Type MW-1 1536611.82 733038.15 - 715.00 717.50 27.0 2 690.50 - 700.50 Partially Weathered Rock MSW Compliance Monitoring Point MW-6 1538418.99 732034.90 - 665.55 668.15 53.7 2 614.45 - 619.45 - Water Level Only MW-7 1538340.33 731108.57 - 660.60 663.14 28.5 2 634.64 - 644.64 - MSW Compliance Monitoring Point MW-9 1536844.42 733960.05 - 698.63 738.13 39.5 2 698.63 - 708.63 - MSW Compliance Monitoring Point MW-11 1538285.50 732876.62 - 680.94 683.27 23.9 2 659.32 - 669.32 - MSW Compliance Monitoring Point MW-12 1538299.11 733113.18 - 682.94 685.88 22.6 2 663.28 - 673.28 - MSW Compliance Monitoring Point MW-13 1538303.87 733395.18 - 694.31 696.33 24.5 2 671.80 - 681.80 - MSW Compliance Monitoring Point MW-16 1539006.79 734292.09 - 750.50 752.69 56.7 2 695.99 - 705.99 - MSW Compliance Monitoring Point MW-17 1539992.75 733886.30 - 752.42 755.36 55.0 2 697.42 - 712.42 - C&D Compliance Monitoring Point MW-18R 1540067.64 732809.77 07/24/07 658.30 661.39 30.0 2 628.30 - 643.30 Saprolite/PWR C&D Compliance Monitoring Point MW-19 1540348.55 732908.08 - 650.47 653.45 20.0 2 630.47 - 645.47 - C&D Compliance Monitoring Point MW-20 1536619.71 732537.54 04/05/05 713.90 717.00 33.0 2 680.9 - 695.9 Saprolite/PWR MSW Compliance Monitoring Point MW-23 1537990.80 732183.59 04/08/05 694.29 697.25 38.5 2 655.79 - 670.79 Saprolite MSW Compliance Monitoring Point MW-23A 1537990.80 732173.30 04/11/05 693.82 696.91 68.5 2 625.32 - 640.32 PWR Water Level Only MW-24R 1537954.02 732801.79 04/12/11 714.39 717.10 43.6 2 686.39 - 671.39 Saprolite/PWR MSW Compliance Monitoring Point MW-25 1536603.20 731757.27 04/15/11 704.98 707.46 40.6 2 679.42 - 664.42 - MSW Compliance Monitoring Point MW-26 1537383.59 731382.04 04/21/11 694.80 697.30 38.9 2 670.88 - 655.88 - MSW Compliance Monitoring Point MW-27 1538076.45 731358.39 04/26/11 661.46 663.90 18.5 2 657.96 - 642.96 - MSW Compliance Monitoring Point MW-27A 1538084.39 731350.62 04/25/11 661.27 664.02 64.3 2 602.27 - 597.27 - Water Level Only MW-28 1538097.33 731753.26 04/26/11 679.23 682.03 26.2 2 668.02 - 653.02 - Water Level Only MW-28R 731882.07 1538013.18 07/11/17 683.04 685.26 35.3 2 666.04 - 651.04 - MSW Compliance Monitoring Point Notes: ft AMSL = feet above mean sea level ft bgs = feet below ground surface TOC = Top of Well Casing Elevation Monitoring wells MW-6, MW-27A, and MW 28 are monitored for water levels only. 4 GOLDER Page 1 of 1 FIGURES OLD EXISTING LANDFILL SEDIMENT ENTRANCE BASIN — I ro // O MW-9 10OO ,�071P9E3-�- II I-' IIII o I MMW-5A o \UPI I F- MW-5 \ O PHASEI MSW LANDFILL o EXISTING I ♦- SEDIMENT BASIN I ..0As� ' 702.4 M _� (V�� � ♦♦ oo 2�5'1 ♦ ♦ I PHASE III 6MSW LANDFILL - 6 I I 84 800 i I I �♦'o- I ❑ I I I I 68( I ♦ _ � � I � � I � 1 1 1 ♦ -' ♦ PHASE IV 6 W-280 MSW LANDFILL I 1 - 1 I 1 ,✓ 1 � 1 1 4p 1 1 1 e s r 1 1 1 0 - INV- ' PROPERTY i LINE D 6.07 fA I -♦♦♦ 1 --' 600 OMW-13 + I� ' ♦�IIIIII I `I(.,I- �,' . ♦�' / ♦- ' ♦I � _- L .-s' ♦y�'�-I_ - T-\ V$ ` VA�♦E\AD-♦,♦i ♦'' ❑'I0.11 j��♦/ �1 - a♦ \'�-°, - -_- �' - -♦\�-- �'' 682.98 CLLOASNDFILL � CLOSEDIy♦'�' LCIDLANDFILL MW-18 FUTURE .4 :t♦ MS1680.1WLANDFILL (PHASES VI TO /' '� i- 665q-U0� EXISTING IX) ♦ SEDIMENT M'f EN' T BASIN MW 676.24 ♦64s.92� MAINTENANCE BILIUDNGo sw-5 4* 41 EXSTN SEDIMENT / 'g -�2 BASIN ♦ J* LEGEND ---- ,> EXISTING TOPOGRAPHIC CONTOUR - - FACILITY BOUNDARY — — — — APPROXIMATE LIMITS OF WASTE - 650 GROUNDWATER SURFACE CONTOURS APPROXIMATE GROUNDWATER FLOW SEGMENT USED TO CALCULATE GRADIENT 11 O6647.7.56 EXISTING GROUNDWATER MONITORING WELL WITH GROUNDWATER ELEVATION ❑SW-4 SURFACE WATER MONITORING POINT COMPLIANCE METHANE MONITORING POINT ASSESSMENT METHANE MONITORING POINT NM NOT MEASURED ® FRENCH DRAIN MONITORING POINT I ,♦' - �� / / /� o Q / NOTES 1. TOPOGRAPHIC CONTOUR INTERVAL = 2 FEET. N - �- /� 2. GROUNDWATER SURFACE CONTOUR INTERVAL = 10 FEET. e, ✓ I ��� _ / 3. GROUNDWATER ELEVATIONS MEASURED ON JANUARY 16, 2020. iGROUNDWATER CONTOURS ARE BASED ON LINEAR INTERPOLATION BETWEEN AND 4 EXTRAPOLATION FROM KNOWN DATA, TOPOGRAPHIC CONTOURS, AND KNOWN FIELD CONDITIONS. THEREFORE, !t .' -x e� — -F = r� - CONDTIONS, GROUNDWATER CONTOURS MAY NOT REFLECT ACTUAL GROUNDWATER % - 1\ \ �0 / I.�a� 5. GROUNDWATER CONTOUR LINES SHOW THE WATER TABLE SHAPE AND ELEVATION. THESE \Fc---- ,i� ✓ u}J - - u,r CONTOURS ARE INFERRED LINES FOLLOWING THE GROUNDWATER SURFACE AT A CONSTANT _FRENCH DRAIN \ ; - .� - - - --�; I` ELEVATION ABOVE SEA LEVEL THE GROUNDWATER FLOW DIRECTION IS GENERALLY -L - - SAMPLE POINT 100-YEAR PERPENDICULAR TO THE GROUNDWATER SURFACE CONTOURS SIMILAR TO THE RELATIONSHIP ! h - J - f�- 4 - • - - - ` y ' r� 1 �T7 , "" �; f Y=-� BETWEEN SURFACE WATER FLOW AND TOPOGRAPHIC CONTOURS. O647.56 MW-7 I TOPOGRAPHY BOUNDARY ( (SEE REFERENCE NOTE) I EXISTING - _ SEDIMENT BASIN I e ` - �� I i 11 TO SW-1 (SEE NOTE 6) r _- --� F - 6. SURFACE WATER MONITORING POINT SW-1 IS APPROXIMATELY 550 FEET OFF THE MAPPING LIMITS SHOWN AND IS COLLECTED FROM SECOND CREEK 7 7 7. MONITORING WELLS MW-23A, MW-27A, MW-28 AND MW-6 ARE UTILIZED FOR WATER LEVEL MONITORING ONLY. 8. THE LOCATION OF THE FRENCH DRAIN MONITORING POINT IS APPROXIMATE. f \ zn..�, i �r - 9. MW-28R WAS INSTALLED JULY 11, 2017 TO REPLACE MW-28. MW-28 WILL CONTINUE TO BE UTILIZED SITE LOCATION �g r FOR WATER LEVEL MONITORING. A� Y Ii 1 REFERENCE 1. EXISTING CONDITIONS INSIDE OF DASHED LINE COMPILED BY CARTOGRAPHIC AERIAL MAPPING, INC. USING PHOTOGRAMMETRIC METHODS, FROM AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY DATED JUNE 26, 2020. EXISTING CONDITIONS OUTSIDE OF DASHED LINE PROVIDED BY S&ME ENGINEERING, INC., DATE - -ti UNKNOWN. 2. PROPERTY BOUNDARY TAKEN FROM CAD FILE TITLED, "WELLS.DWG," PROVIDED BY HDR INC. -mot 0 250 500 SITE LOCATION MAP " = SCALE FEET 110,000' CLIENT ROWAN COUNTY CONSULTANT PG C-399 YYYY-MM-DD 2020-11-11 PREPARED BPG G G O L D E R DESIGN RPK REVIEW DYR GOLDER ASSOCIATES NC, INC. APPROVED RPK PR' ROWAN COUNTY ACTIVE AND CLOSED LANDFILLS PERMIT NO. 80-03 ROWAN COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA TITLE WATER QUALITY MONITORING PLAN PROJECT No. 20-140083 400 FIGURE 0 1 1 /4" WEEP HOLE GROUND SURFACE 0.5 BENTONITE LAYER (2' MIN.) BOTTOM CAP 11 3 j CLIENT ROWAN COUNTY CONSULTANT YYYY-MM-DD DESIGNED G O L D E R PREPARED REVIEWED APPROVED 2020-11-11 RPK BPG PROTECTIVE CASING WITH LOCK SURVEYOR'S PIN (FLUSH MOUNT) CONCRETE WELL APRON MINIMUM 2'x2' SQUARE ° a ° °°° PAD SLOPED TO DRAIN v ° CONTINUOUS POUR - a CONCRETE CAP AND WELL APRON -v CEMENT AND SODIUM BENTONITE MIXTURE WELL DIAMETER 2" PVC THREADED BOREHOLE DIAMETER 6" MINIMUM FILTER PACK 20-40 SAND (2' OR LESS ABOVE SCREEN) POTENTIOMETRIC SURFACE SCREENED INTERVAL 0.010 INCH SLOT MANUFACTURED SCREEN PROJECT ROWAN COUNTY ACTIVE AND CLOSED LANDFILLS PERMIT NO. 80-03 ROWAN COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA TITLE TYPICAL GROUNDWATER MONITORING WELL SCHEMATIC DYR PROJECT NO. RPK 20-140083 REV. FIGURE 4 0 2 FF APPENDIX A REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS DENR USE ONLY ❑Paper Report [:]Electronic Data - Email CD (data loaded: Yes / No Doc/Event #: NC DENR I I Environmental Monitoring Division of Waste Management - Solid Waste Reporting Form Notice: This form and any information attached to it are "Public Records" as defined in NC General Statute 132-1. As such, these documents are available for inspection and examination by any person upon request (NC General Statute 132-6). Instructions: Prepare one form for each individually monitored unit. Please type or print legibly. Attach a notification table with values that attain or exceed NC 2L groundwater standards or NC 2B surface water standards. The notification must include a preliminary analysis of the cause and significance of each value. (e.g. naturally occurring, off -site source, pre-existing condition, etc.). Attach a notification table of any groundwater or surface water values that equal or exceed the reporting limits. Attach a notification table of any methane gas values that attain or exceed explosive gas levels. This includes any structures on or nearby the facility (NCAC 13B .1629 (4)(a)(i). Send the original signed and sealed form, any tables, and Electronic Data Deliverable to: Compliance Unit, NCDENR-DWM, Solid Waste Section, 1646 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1646. Solid Waste Monitoring Data Submittal Information Name of entity submitting data (laboratory, consultant, facility owner): Contact for questions about data formatting. Include data preparer's name, telephone number and E-mail address: Name: E-mail: Phone: NC Landfill Rule: Actual sampling dates (e.g., Facility name: Facility Address: Facility Permit # (.0500 or. 1600) October 20-24, 2006) Environmental Status: (Check all that apply) ❑ Initial/Background Monitoring ❑ Detection Monitoring ❑ Assessment Monitoring ❑ Corrective Action of data submitted: (Check all that apply) Groundwater monitoring data from monitoring wells ❑ Groundwater monitoring data from private water supply wells ❑ Leachate monitoring data ❑ Surface water monitoring data Methane gas monitoring data Corrective action data (specify) Other(specify) Notification attached? B No. No groundwater or surface water standards were exceeded. Yes, a notification of values exceeding a groundwater or surface water standard is attached. It includes a list of groundwater and surface water monitoring points, dates, analytical values, NC 2L groundwater standard, NC 2B surface water standard or NC Solid Waste GWPS and preliminary analysis of the cause and significance of any concentration. ❑ Yes, a notification of values exceeding an explosive methane gas limit is attached. It includes the methane monitoring points, dates, sample values and explosive methane gas limits. Certification To the best of my knowledge, the information reported and statements made on this data submittal and attachments are true and correct. Furthermore, I have attached complete notification of any sampling values meeting or exceeding groundwater standards or explosive gas levels, and a preliminary analysis of the cause and significance of concentrations exceeding groundwater standards. I am aware that there are significant penalties for making any false statement, representation, or certification including the possibility of a fine and imprisonment. Facility Representative Name (Print) Title (Area Code) Telephone Number Signature Facility Representative Address Date Affix NC Licensed/ Professional Geologist Seal NC PE Firm License Number (if applicable effective May 1, 2009) Revised 6/2009 NC Solid Waste Section Environmental Monitoring List NC Solid Waste Section Environmental Monitoring± Groundwater Protection Compliance Standards - Constituents List (updated October15, 2018) All units are ug/L unless otherwise noted. NE = Not Established Groundwater Protection Standards 1 CAS RN Z j SWS ID' CHEMICAL NAME 2L i DEQ Calculated j 2L IMAC MCL GWP Std Reference List` 67-64-1 107-13-1 3 Acetone 6000 8 Acrylonitrile NE 13 Antimony NE 14 Arsenic 30 15 Barium 700 16 Benzene 1 23 Beryllium NE 28 Bromochloromethane; Chlorobromethane NE 29 Bromodichloromethane; Dibromochloromethane 0.6 30 Bromoform; Tribromomethane 4 34 Cadmium 2 35 Carbon disulfide 700 36 Carbon tetrachloride 0.3 39 Chlorobenzene so 41 Chloroethane; Ethyl chloride 3000 44 Chloroform; Trichloromethane 70 51 Chromium 10 I _ 53 Cobalt NE 54 Copper 1000 66 Dibromochloromethane; Chlorodibromomethane 0.4 67 1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane; DBCP 0.04 68 1,2-Dibromoethane; Ethylene dibromide; EDB 0.02 1 69 o-Dichiorobenzene;1,2-Dichlorobenzene -1 20 71 p-Dichlorobenzene; 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 6 73 trans-1,4-Dichloro-2-butene NE 75 1,1-Dichloroethane; Ethyldidene chloride 6 76 1,2-Dichloroethane; Ethylene dichloride 0.4 77 1,1-Dichloroethylene; 1,1-Dichloroethene; 350 NE NE NE Appendix I Appendix I NE NE NE 7440-36-0 1 6 NE A2ften ix A n ix1 Aooendix I A en ixI ARgen ix I Appendix I Appendix I Appendix I AUSndix I Appendix I AWLgndix I AooendixI Appendix I Aooendix 1 Appendix I Ap2endix I AooendixI Aooendix I 7440-38-2 NE 10 NE 7440-39-3 NE 2000 NE 71-43-2 7440-41-7 NE 5 NE 4 4 NE 74-97-5 75-27-4 75-25-2 7440-43-9 NE NE 0.6 NE 80 NE NE NE 80 NE 5 NE 75-15-0 NE NE NE 56-23-5 NE 5 NE 108-90-7 NE 100 NE 75-00-3 NE NE NE 67-66-3 NE 80 NE 7440-47-3 NE 100 NE ` 7440-48-4 i NE _ NE 7440-50-8 NE 1300 NE 124-48-1 96-12-8 106-93-4 95-50-1 106-46-7 NE 80 NE NE 0.2 1 NE I Aooendix I NE 0.05 NE i Appendix I ARpendix I Appendix I NE 600 NE NE 75 NE 110-57-6 75-34-3 107-06-2 75-35-4 NE NE NE A n gxI NE NE NE Aooendix I NE 5 NE I Appendix NE 7 NE Aooendix) Page 1 of 11 NC Solid Waste Section Environmental Monitoring List Groundwater Protection Standards) CAS RN z 156-59-2 SWS ID CHEMICAL CHEMICAL NAME Vinylidene chloride cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene; cis-1,2- 78 Dichloroethene 79 trans-1,2-Dichloroethylene;trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 82 1,2-Dichloropropane 86 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene DEQ Calculated 2L 21. [MAC MCL GWP Std Reference List` 70 NE 70 NE I ADDendix I 156-60-5 100 NE 100 NE ARRendix1 78_87-5 10061-01-5 0.6 NE 5 NE A nix I 0.4 NE NE NE ADDendix 1 10061-02-6 87 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 0.4 NE NE NE ADDendix I 100-41-4 110 Ethylbenzene 600 NE 700 NE AROnclix1 591-78-6 124 2-Hexanone; Methyl butyl ketone NE 40 1 NE NE ARRCndix I 7439-92-1 131 Lead is NE 15 NE A en ix1 74-83-9 136 Methyl bromide; Bromomethane NE 10 NE NE &WSndix 1 74-87-3 137 Methyl chloride; Chloromethane 3 NE NE NE ADDendix 1 74-95-3 75-09-2 78-93-3 139 Methylene bromide; Dibromomethane NE 5 70 NE NE 5 NE NE Appendix I ADDendix 1 140 Methylene chloride; Dichloromethane 141 Methyl ethyl ketone; MEK; 2-Butanone 142 Methyl iodide; Iodomethane 147 4-Methyl-2-pentanone; Methyl isobutyl ketone 152Nickel 183 t Selenium 184 Silver 186 Styrene 190 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 191 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane Tetrachloroethylene; Tetrachloroethene; 192 Perchloroethylene 4000 NE NE NE ADDendix I 74-88-4 NE NE NE NE Agpencliox 1 108-10-1 NE 100 NE NE Appendix I Appendix I Appendix I A nix 1 Appendix Appendix 1 ADoendix I - A2Rgn Ix ADDendix I 744D-02-0 100 NE NE NE 7782-49-2 20 NE 50 NE 7440-22-4 20 NE NE NE 100-42-5 70 NE 100 NE 630-20-6 79-34-5 127-18-4 NE 1 NE NE 0.2 NE NE NE 0.7 NE NE 0.2 1 5 NE 2 NE 1000 NE 200 NE 7440-28-0 108-88-3 71-55-6 194 Thallium 196 Toluene 200 1,1,1-Trichloroethane; Methylchloroform 201 Trichloroethylene; Trichloroethene 202 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 600 NE j ARRgndixI 200 NE Appendix 1 A nix I ADDendix 1 79-01-6 3 NE 5 NE 79-00-5 NE 1 2000 0.6 NE 5 NE NE 75-69-4 203 Trichlorofluoromethane; CFC-11 206 1,2,3-Trichloropropane 209 Vanadium 210 Vinyl acetate 211 Vinyl chloride; Chloroethene NE A en ix 1 Appendix I 96-18-4 1 0.00s NE NE NE 7440-62-2 NE 0.3 NE NE ARRen ix I 108-05-4 NE 88 NE I NE ADoendix I 75-01-4 0.03 NE 2 1 NE A nix I Page 2 of 11 NC Solid Waste Section Environmental Monitoring List Groundwater Protection Standards 1 CAS RN Z 7440-66-6 1330-20-7 ! I DEQ Calculated SWS ID a CHEMICAL NAME 2L 2L IMAC MCL GWP Std Reference List` 213 Zinc 1000 NE NE NE _Appendix I 346 Xylene (total) 500 NE 10000 NE Appendix 83-32-9 208-96-8 1 Acenaphthene 2 Acenaphthylene 80 NE NE NE Appendix II Appendix II 200 NE NE NE 75-05-8 4 Acetonitrile; Methyl cyanide NE NE NE NE Appendix II 98-86-2 5 Acetophenone NE 700 NE NE Appendix II 53-96-3 6 2-Acetylaminofluorene; 2-AAF NE NE NE NE Appendix II 107-02-8 7 Acrolein NE 4 NE NE Appendix II 309-00-2 9 10 Aldrin Ally[ chloride NE 0.002 NE NE Appendix II 107-05-1 NE NE NE NE NE NE Appendix II 92-67-1 11 4-Aminobiphenyl 12 Anthracene 17 Benzo[a]anthracene; Benzanthracene 18 Benzo[b]fluoranthene 19 Benzo[k]fluoranthene 20 Benzo[ghi]perylene 21 Benzo[a]pyrene 22 Benzyl alcohol 24 alpha-BHC 25 beta-BHC NE NE Appendix II 120-12-7 2000 NE NE NE NE NE NE 700 0.006 0.02 NE NE NE NE Appendix II Appendix II Appendix II 56-55-3 0.05 0.05 0.5 200 0.005 205-99-2 NE NE 207-08-9 NE NE Appendix II 191-24-2 NE NE Appendix II 50-32-8 1 0.2 NE NE NE NE NE NE NE Appendix II Appendix II Appendix II Appendix II 100-51-6 NE 319-84-6 NE 319-85-7 NE NE 319-86-8 26 delta-BHC NE NE 0.019 Appendix II 58-89-9 27 31 gamma-BHC; Lindane 4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether 0.03 NE 0.2 NE Appendix II Appendix II 101-55-3 NE NE NE NE 85-68-7 32 i Butyl benzyl phthalate; Benzyl butyl phthalate 33 Di-n-butyl phthalate 38 p-Chloroaniline 40 Chlorobenzilate 42 Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane 43 Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether; Dichloroethyl ether 45 p-Chloro-m-cresol; 4-Chloro-3-methylphenol Bis(2-chloro-l-methylethyl) ether; 2,2'- 46 Dichlorodiisopropyl ether; DCIP 47 2-Chloronaphthalene 1000 NE NE NE I Appendix II 84-74-2 106-47-8 510-15-6 700 NE NE NE Appendix II Appd NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE Appendix II 111-91-1 NE NE NE NE Appendix II 111-44-4 NE NE NE 0.031 Appendix II Appendix II Appendix II 59-50-7 108-60-1 91-58-7 NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE Appendix II Page 3 of 11 NC Solid Waste Section Environmental Monitoring List Groundwater Protection Standards 1 CAS RN z DEQ calculated SWS ID' CHEMICAL NAME 2L 2L [MAC MCL GWP Std Reference List° 48 2-Chlorophenol 0.4 NE NE NE Appendix II 49 4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether NE NE i NE NE Appendix II 95-57-8 7005-72-3 126-99-8 50 Chloroprene NE NE NE NE Appendix II 218-01-9 95-48-7 57-12-5 52 Chrysene o-Cresol; 2-Methylphenol 5 NE NE NE Appendix II Appendix II Appendix II Appendix 11 Appendix 11 56 NE 400 NE NE 58 Cyanide 70 NE 200 NE 94-75-7 59 60 2,4-D; 2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid 70 NE 70 NE 72-54-8 4,4'-DDD 0.2 NE NE NE 72-55-9 61 4,4'-DDE NE NE NE NE NE NE i Appendix II Appendix II 50-29-3 62 4,4'-DDT 0.1 NE 2303-16-4 63 Diallate NE NE NE NE ADDenc ix 11 53-70-3 132-64-9 541-73-1 91-94-1 75-71-8 64 65 Dibenz[a,h)anthracene Dibenzofuran m-Dichlorobenzene;1,3-Dichlorobenzene 3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine 0.005 NE NE NE NE Appendix II Appendix II Appendix II NE 28 NE 70 200 NE NE NE 72 NE 1000 NE NE NE NE NE NE ADpendix II Appendix II 74 Dichlorodifluoromethane; CFC 12 120-83-2 80 2,4-Dichlorophenol NE 0.98 NE NE Appendix II 87-65-0 81 2,6-Dichlorophenol NE NE NE NE Appendix 11 142-28-9 1 83 1,3-Dichloropropane; Trimethylene dichloride NE NE NE NE Appendix 11 594-20-7 84 2,2-Dichloropropane; Isopropylidene chloride 85 1,1-Dichloropropene 88 Dieldrin 89 O,O-Diethyl O-2-pyrazinyl phosphorothioate; Thionazin 90 Diethyl phthalate NE NE NE NE ADpendix II 563-58-6 NE NE NE i NE Appendix II Appendix 11 60-57-1 0.002 1 NE NE NE 297-97-2 NE NE NE NE ADpendix 11 84-66-2 6000 NE NE NE Appendix II 60-51-5 60-11-7 57-97-6 91 Dimethoate _ 92 I p-(Dimethylamino)azobenzene 93 7,12-Dimethylbenz[a)anthracene 94 3,3'-Dimethylbenzidine 95 2,4-Dimethylphenol; m-Xylenol 96 Dimethyl phthalate NE NE NE NE Appendix II NE NE NE NE Appendix 11 NE NE NE NE Appendix II 119-93-7 NE NE NE NE Appendix 11 ADpendix II 105-67-9 100 1 NE NE NE 131-11-3 NE NE NE NE ADpendix 11 99-65-0 97 m-Dinitrobenzene NE NE NE NE ADpendix II 534-52-1 98 4,6-Dinitro-o-cresol; 4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol NE NE I NE I NE ADpendix II Page 4 of 11 NC Solid Waste Section Environmental Monitoring List Groundwater Protection Standards t CAS RN 2 SWS ID a CHEMICAL NAME DEQ Calculated 21. 211. IMAC MCL GWP Std Reference List ` NE NE NE NE Appendix II 51-28-5 99 2,4-Dinitrophenol 121-14-2 100 2,4-Dinitrotoluene NE 0.1 NE NE ADpendix II 606-20-2 101 2,6-Dinitrotoluene NE NE NE NE Appendix 11 88-85-7 102 Dinoseb; DNBP; 2-sec-Butyl-4,6-dinitrophenol Diphenylamine NE 7 1 7 NE Appendix II ADpendix 11 122-39-4 103 NE NE NE NE 298-04-4 104 Disulfoton 0.3 NE NE NE Appendix 11 959-98-8 105 Endosulfan 1 106 Endosulfan II 107 Endosulfan sulfate 40 NE NE NE Appendix 11 33213-65-9 NE NE NE 42 Appendix II Appendix II Appendix II 1031-07-8 NE 2 40 NE NE 2 E ENE 72-20-8 108 Endrin 7421-93-4 109 Endrin aldehyde 111 Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate 112 Ethyl methacrylate 2 NE NE NE Appendix II 117-81-7 3 NE NE NE Appendix 11 Appendix II Appendix II 97-63-2 NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE 62-50-0 113 Ethyl methanesulfonate NE NE NE 52-85-7 114 Famphur NE 300 NE NE Appendix 11 206-44-0 115 Fluoranthene 116 Fluorene 117 Heptachlor 118 Heptachlor epoxide NE NE Appendix 11 Appendix II Appendix 11 86-73-7 76-44-8 1024-57-3 300 NE NE 0.008 NE 0.4 NE 0.004 NE 1 0.2 NE Appendix 11 118-74-1 119 Hexachlorobenzene 0.02 NE 1 NE Appendix11 87-68-3 120 Hexachlorobutadiene Hexachlorocyclopentadiene Hexachloroethane 0.4 NE NE NE Appendix II Appendix 11 Appendix 11 Appendix II 77-47-4 121 NE NE NE NE 50 SO 67-72-1 122 NE NE NE NE 2.5 NE 1888-71-7 123 Hexachloropropene 193-39-5 125 Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 0.05 1 NE NE NE I Appendix II Appendix 11 78-83-1 126 Isobutyl alcohol 127 Isodrin 128 Isophorone NE NE NE NE 465-73-6 NE NE NE NE Appendix II 78-59-1 40 NE I NE NE Appendix II 120-58-1 129 Isosafrole NE NE NE NE Appendix II 143-50-0 130 Kepone NE NE NE NE Appendix 11 7439-97-6 132 Mercury 1 NE 2 NE App. II / C&D 126-98-7 133 Methacrylonitrile NE NEI NE NE ADpendix 11 Page 5 of 11 NC Solid Waste Section Environmental Monitoring List CAS RN z 91-80-5 72-43-5 56-49-5 80-62-6 66-27-3 91-57-6 298-00-0 91-20-3 130-15-4 134-32-7 91-59-8 99-09-2 88-74-4 100.01-6 98-95-3 99-55-8 88-75-5 100-02-7 55-18-5 62-75-9 924-16-3 86-30-6 SWS ID 3 CHEMICAL NAME 134 Methapyrilene 135 Methoxychlor 138 3-Methylcholanthrene 143 Methyl methacrylate 144 Methyl methanesulfonate 145 2-Methylnaphthalene 146 Methyl parathion; Parathion methyl 148 Naphthalene 149 1,4-Naphthoquinone 150 1-Naphthylamine 151�2-N'a'p-hthyla mine 153 m-Nitroaniline;3-Nitroaniline____ 154 o-Nitroaniline; 2-Nitroaniline 155 rp-Nitroaniline; 4-Nitroaniline 156 Nitrobenzene 157 5-Nitro-o-toluidine 158 o-Nitrophenoi; 2-Nitrophenol 159 1 p-Nitrophenol; 4-Nitrophenol 160 _N_-Nitrosodiethylamine i 161 i N-Nitrosodimethylamine 162 N-Nitro sodi-n-butylamine 163 N-Nitrosodiphenylamine N-Nitrosodipropylamine; N-Nitroso-N-dipropylamine; Di - Groundwater Protection Standards 1 211. 21. IMAC MCL NE NE NE DEQ Calculated GWP Std Reference List ° NE j Appendix II NE Appendix II NE Appendix II 40 NE NE NE NE NE NE 25 NE NE Appendix II I Appendix II NE NE NE NE 30 NE NE NE Appendix II NE NE NE NE Appendix II 6 NE NE NE Appendix II Appendix II Appendix II Appendix II Appendix II NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE I NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE Appendix II Appendix II Appendix II Appendix II Appendix II T Appendix II NE NE I NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE I NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE Appendix II 0.0007 NE NE NE Appendix II NE NE NE NE Appendix II Appendix If NE NE NE NE I 621-64-7 164 n-propyinitrosamine NE NE NE NE 10595-95-6 100-75-4 165 N-Nitrosomethylethalamine 166 N-Nitrosopiperidine 167 N-Nitrosopyrrolidine 168 Di-n-octyl phthalate 169 Parathion NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE 930-55-2 117-84-0 56-38-2 I NE NE NE I NE 100 NE NE NE NE NE NE NE 1336-36-3 170 Polychlorinated biphenyls; PCBs 171 Pentachlorobenzene 172 Pentachloronitrobenzene 173 Pentachlorophenol NE 0.09 0.5 NE 608-93-5 NE NE NE NE 82-68-8 NE NE NE NE 87-86-5 0.3 NE 1 NE Page 6 of 11 NC Solid Waste Section Environmental Monitoring List CAS RN z I SWS ID' CHEMICAL NAME Groundwater 2L NE 200 NE Protection 21. IMAC NE NE NE Standards 1 MCL NE NE NE NE DEQ Calculated GWPStd NE NE NE NE Reference List Appendix II Appendix II Appendix II Appendix II 62-44-2 174 Phenacetin 85-01-8 106-50-3 175 Phenanthrene 176 177 p-Phenylenediamine Phenol 108-95-2 30 NE 298-02-2 178 Phorate 1 NE NE NE Appendix II 23950-58-5 179 Pronamide NE NE NE NE Appendix II 107-12-0 180 Propionitrile; Ethyl cyanide Pyrene NE NE NE NE NE NE Appendix II Appendix 11 Appendix 11 129-00-0 181 200 NE NE NE NE NE 94-59-7 182 Safrole 93-72-1 185 Silvex; 2,4,5-TP 50 NE NE NE Appendix 11 18496-25-8 187 Sulfide N I NE NE NE Appendix 11 93-76-5 95-94-3 188 2,4,5-T; 2,4,5-Trichlorophenoxyacetic acid 1,2,4,5-Tetrachlorobe nzene 2,3,4,6-Tetrachlorophenol Tin NE NE NE NE Appendix II 189 NE 2 NE NE Appendix 11 58-90-2 193 200 NE NE NE Appendix II ADoendix 11 7440-31-5 195 NE 2000 NE NE 95-53-4 197 o-Toluidine Toxaphene NE NE NE NE Appendix 11 Appendix II 8001-35-2 198 0.03 NE 3 NE 120-82-1 199 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 70 NE 70 NE Appendix 11 95-95-4 204 2,4,5-Trichlorophenol NE 63 NE NE Appendix 11 88-06-2 205 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol NE 4 NE NE Appendix 11 126-68-1 207 0,0,0-Triethyl phosphorothioate NE NE NE NE Appendix 11 99-35-4 208 sym-Trinitrobenzene NE NE NE NE Appendix 11 57-74-9 339 Chlordane 0.1 NE NE NE ADoendix II 106-44-5 344 p-Cresol; 4-Methylphenol 40 400 NE NE NE NE NE NE Appendix 11 Appendix II Appendix II Appendix 11 108-394 345 m-Cresol; 3-Methylphenol 386 Benzeneethanamine, alpha,alpha-dimethyl 122-09-8 NE .0002 ng/L NE NE 1 NE 0.03 NE NE 1746-01-6 1 440 2,3,7,8-TCDD; 2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo- p-dioxin 123-91-1 I 422 I 1,4-dioxane 3 I NE I NE i NE ALL' SW301 301 Chloride 250000 NE NE NE C&D SW311 311 Total Dissolved Solids 500000 NE NE NE C&D 14808-79-8 315 Sulfate 250000 NE NE NE C&D/Leachate SW337 337 1 Alkalinity NE NE NE NE C&D Page 7 of 11 NC Solid Waste Section Environmental Monitoring List Groundwater Protection Standards' CAS RN z SWS ID' CHEMICAL NAME 7439-89-6 340 Iron DEQ Calculated 2L 2L IMAC MCL GWP Std Reference List ` 300 NE NE NE C&D 50 NE NE NE _ C&D NE NE NE NE C&D 7439 96 5 342 Manganese 441 Tetrahydrofuran 109-99-9 SW316 316 piological Oxygen Demand 317 Chemical Oxygen Demand 419 No2/No3 (nitrate & nitrite reported together) 1 437 Orthophosphate Phosphorus NE NE NE NE NE NE NE Leachate Leachate SW317 NE SW419 NE NE 7.0 NE NE NE Leachate Leachate _ Leachate__ I Leachate SW437 NE NE NE SW321 SW32424 T321pH (lab) I SpecCond (lab) NE NE NE NE NE I NE NE 226-36-8 385 1,2,5,6-Dibenzacridine 394 1,2-Diphenylhydrazine 371 1-2-3-Trichlorobenzene 352 2-(2-4-dichlorophenoxy)propionic acid 350 2-4 DB NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE Other Other Other 122-66-7 NE 87-61-6 NE NE NE 120-36-5 NE NE NE I Other Other 94-82-6 NE NE NE 130-75-8 358 2-Chloroethylvinyl ether NE 390 2-Picoline NE 388 4-nitroquinoline-l-oxide NE 416 Acetic Acid NE NE NE NE Other Other other Other 109-06-8 NE NE NE 56-57-5 NE NE NE 64-19-7 5000 NE NE 62-53-3 381 1 Aniline NE NE NE NE Other 140-57-8 382 Aramite NE NE NE NE Other 12674-11-2 401 Aroclor 1016 Aroclor1221 NE NE NE NE Other 11104-28-2 11141-16-5 402 NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE Other Other 403 Aroclor 1232 53469-21-9 404 Aroclor 1242 NE NE NE NE Other 12672-29-6 11097-69-1 405 Aroclor 12_48 NE NE NE NE I NE NE NE NE I NE NE Other Other__ _ Other other Other other 406 407 383 1 Aroclor1254 i Aroclor 1260 Benzidine 11096-82-5 NE NE 92-87-5 NE NE NE I NE 7440-42-8 428 Boron 347 Bicarbonate (as CaCO3) 423 biphenyl ether 700 NE NE NE SW347 101-84-8 NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE Other 108-86-1 360 Bromobenzene NE NE NE NE Other Page 8 of 11 NC Solid Waste Section Environmental Monitoring List Groundwater Protection Standards 1 CAS RN Z SW418 7440-70-2 SWS ID' CHEMICAL NAME 418 Butyric Acid 375 Calcium DEQ Calculated 21. 2L IMAC MCL GWP Std Reference List 4 NE NE NE NE Other NE NE NE NE other NE NE NE NE Other NE NE NE NE Other SW413 413 Carbon Dioxide (CO2) SW348 12789-03-6 348 Carbonate (as CaCO3) Chlordane (constituents) 400 NE NE NE NE other 79-06-1 429 Acrylamide 0.008 NE NE NE Other 5103-71-9 379 Chlordane, alpha NE NE I NE NE Other 5103-74-2 378 Chlordane, beta NE NE NE NE 2 NE NE NE other Other 5566-34-7 399 Chlordane, gamma 75-99-0 355 Dalapon NE 200 200 NE Other SW318 318 Depth To Water (ft) NE NE NE NE Other 1918-00-9 353 Dicamba NE NE NE NE NE NE NE Other Other Other SW334 334 Ferrous Iron- Dissolved Groundwater Elevation (feet) NE NE SW427 427 NE NE NE NE NE NE SW319 319 Head (ft mean sea level) NE NE NE NE NE Other Other Other Other other 70-30.4 387 Hexachlorophene Hydrogen Sulfide Lactic Acid NE I NE NE SW338 SW415 SW329 338 415 NE NE NE NE NE NE 329 Landfill Gas NE NE NE SW374 374 m-&p-Cresol (combined) NE NE NE NE Other 92-52-4 SW359 421 1,1-biphenyl m-&p-Xylene (combined) Carbofuran 400 NE NE NE Other 359 NE NE NE NE Other Other Other 1563-66-2 430 40 10000 NE NE 40 NE NE NE 107-21-1 424 ethylene glycol 142-82-5 432 Heptane 400 NE NE NE Other 7439-95-4 376 Magnesium MCPA 1,1,2-Trichlorotrifluoroethane NE NE NE NE Other Other 94-74-6 351 NE NE NE NE 76-13-1 398 200000 NE NE NE Other 93-65-2 354 Mecopop, MCPP Methane- Dissolved Molybdenum NE NE NE NE Other SW333 7439-98-7 333 NE NE NE NE Other 397 i NE NE NE NE NE NE NE NE Other Other 108-38 3 409 1 m-Xylene Page 9 of 11 NC Solid Waste Section Environmental Monitoring List Groundwater Protection Standards 1 DEQ CAS RN z SWS ID a CHEMICAL NAME SW426 426 N-nitrosodiphenylamine/diphenylamine SW439 439 N-Nitrosodiphenylamine/Diphenylamine 65-85-0 395 Benzoic Acid 211. 21. (MAC MCL GWP Std Reference List NE NE Other NE NE Other NE NE other NE NE NE NE 30000 1 NE 39638-32-9 384 Bis(2-chloroisopropyl) ether 0.03 NE NE NE Other 59-89-2 389 N-Nitrosomorpholine Coliform (total) NE NE NE NE Other other SW309 309 1 is NE NE 5 NE NE NE SW310 310 Color (color units) Other SW336 SW313 SW314 336 Oxygen Reduction Potential (mV) Foaming Agents NE NE NE NE Other Other Other 313 500 is NE NE NE NE NE NE 314 Gross Alpha 106-43-4 365 4-Chlorotoluene NE NE 24 25 NE NE NE NE Other other Other Other 99-87-6 108-20-3 98-82-8 368 _ p-Cymene 366 ( Isopropyl ether 367 Isopropylbenzene 70 NE NE NE 70 NE NE NE 76-01-7 380 Pentachloroethane NE NE NE NE other SW335 335 Manganese- Dissolved s0 NE NE NE Other 108-67-8 373 Mesiitylene (1-3-5-trimethylbenzene) 400 NE NE NE other 7440-09-7 377 Potassium NE NE NE NE Other 1634-04-4 369 Methyl-tert-butyl ether (MTBE) 20 NE NE NE Other 104-51-8 361 n-Butylbenzene 70 NE NE NE Other SW417 417 PropionicAcid NE NE NE NE Other 106-42-3 410 p-Xylene _ NE NE NE NE Other 103-65-1 370 1 n-Propylbenzene 70 NE NE NE other 95-49-8 364 o-Chlorotoluene 100 NE NE NE Other 110-86-1 391 414 1 Pyridine Pyruvic Acid NE NE NE 7 Other SW414 NE NE NE NE NE NE NE 20000 NE NE NE Other Other Other Other other Other Other 7440-23-5 322 Sodium SW323 323 SpecCond (field) 307 petroleum aliphatic carbon fraction class C19 - C36 305 petroleum aliphatic carbon fraction class CS - C8 306 petroleum aliphatic carbon fraction class C9 - C18 308 petroleum aromatics carbon fraction class C9 - C22 NE NE NE SW307 10000 NE NE SW305 400 NE NE NE SW306 700 NE NE SW308 200 NE NE NE Page 10 of 11 NC Solid Waste Section Environmental Monitoring List Groundwater Protection Standards) DEQ 2 Calculated CAS RN i SWS ID a CHEMICAL NAME 211. 2L IMAC MCL GWP Std SW320 320 pH (field) 7.0 NE NE NE 95-63-6 372 Pseudocumene (1-2-4-trimethylbenzene) 400 NE NE NE 3689-24-5 392 Sulfotep NE NE NE NE SW325 325 Temp (oC) NE NE NE NE 135-98-8 362 sec-Butylbenzene 70 NE NE NE SW328 328 Top Of Casing (ft mean sea level) NE I NE NE NE SW425 425 Total BHC 0.02 NE NE NE SW436 436 Total Fatty Acids NE NE NE NE E-10195 357 Total Organic Carbon NE NE NE NE 98-06-6 363 tert-Butylbenzene 70 NE NE NE SW396 396 Total Organic Halides NE NE NE NE SW343 343 Total Suspended Solids NE NE NE NE SW411 _� 411 Total Well Depth (ft) NE NE NE NE SW330 330 Turbidity NE i NE NE NE NOTE: GWPSs as listed are current as of October 15, 2018 and are subject to change. Refer to originating sources for any changes. Reference List 4 Other 1 Groundwater Protection Standard (GWPS) - For compliance purposes, the applicable GWPS is the lower of the listed standards. 2 CAS RN = Chemical Abstract Service Registry Number. For listed contituents with no CAS, the SWS ID is used. 3 SWS ID = Solid Waste Section ID. Unique ID assigned by the Section. 4 Constituents Reference Lists APPENDIX I - Constituents for Detection Monitoring per 40 CFR Part 258 (7.1-2017 Edition) APPENDIX II -List of Hazardous Inorganic & Organic Constituents per 40 CFR Part 258 (7-1-2017 Edition). Appendix ll list includes all Appendix I constituents. C&D - Additional monitored constituents required for Construction & Demolition landfills (CDLFs) LEACHATE - Monitored constituents for leachate sampling as specified in permit conditions. other - other constituents, field testing, field measurements, or miscellaneous data that may be required by the Section. 5 ALL -1,4-Dioxane sampling required for all MSW, C&D, & Industrial landfills (active and closed) per SWS Memo dated May 29, 2018. Other Other Other Other Other Other Other Other Other Other Other Other Other GW Protection Standards References 2L - NC groundwater water standards per 15A NCAC 02L .0202 2L IMAC (Interim Maximum Allowable Concentrations) - Interim NC groundwater standards per 15A NCAC 02L .0202 MCL (Maximum Contaminant Level) - National primary drinking water standards per Safe Drinking Water Act under 40 CFR Part 141 NC GWP Std (NC Groundwater Protected Standard) - Groundwater value calculated by NC DEQ for constituents with no established 2L standard. Values are calculated using criteria 1 & 2 of the NC Groundwater standards and do not consider taste, odor, MCLs, MCLG, and secondary drinking water standards. Weblink for 40 CFR Part 258 Page 11 of 11 � GOLDER golder.com