HomeMy WebLinkAbout23081_Kroehler Mnfg Brownfields Assessment Work Plan_20200611Via Email
June 11, 2020
NCDEQ – Division of Waste Management Brownfields Program 1646 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1646
Attn: Mr. Bill Schmithorst, PG
Re: Brownfields Assessment Work Plan Kroehler Manufacturing
Charlotte, North Carolina Brownfields Project No. 23081-19-060 H&H Project No. BCP-145
Dear Mr. Schmithorst:
On behalf of BIN – MR3412 LLC, please find the enclosed Brownfields Assessment Work Plan prepared for the former Kroehler Manufacturing property for your review and record. With your concurrence, we will schedule the field activities.
Should you have any questions or need additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me at (704) 586-0007.
Sincerely,
Hart & Hickman, PC
Alexis McKenzie, EI Ralph McGee, PG
Project Engineer Project Manager
Enclosure
cc: Mr. Pete Kidwell, Beacon Partners (Via Email)
Mr. Miller Otstott, Beacon Partners (Via Email) Ms. Mary Katherine H. Stukes, Moore & Van Allen (Via Email)
i S:\AAA-Master Projects\Beacon Partners- BEP or BCP\BCP-145 Monroe Road\Work Plan\Final to DEQ\23081 - Brownfields Assessment Work Plan_Kroehler Manufacturing.doc
Brownfields Assessment Work Plan
Kroehler Manufacturing
Charlotte, North Carolina
Brownfields Project No. 23081-19-060
H&H Job No. BCP-145
Table of Contents
1.0 Introduction .............................................................................................................................1
1.1 Background ............................................................................................................................1
1.2 Previous Environmental Assessments ...................................................................................2
2.0 Brownfields Assessment Activities ........................................................................................5
2.1 Receptor Survey ....................................................................................................................5
2.2 Soil Sampling Activities ........................................................................................................6
2.3 Groundwater Sampling Activities .........................................................................................8
2.4 Quality Assurance – Quality Control ..................................................................................10
2.6 Investigation Derived Waste ...............................................................................................11
2.7 Reporting .............................................................................................................................11
List of Tables
Table 1 Sample Summary Table
List of Figures
Figure 1 Site Location Map
Figure 2 Site Map
Figure 2 Historical and Proposed Sample Location Map
List of Appendices
Appendix A Template Brownfields Property Receptor Survey Form
1
S:\AAA-Master Projects\Beacon Partners- BEP or BCP\BCP-145 Monroe Road\Work Plan\Final to DEQ\23081 - Brownfields Assessment Work Plan_Kroehler Manufacturing.doc
Brownfields Assessment Work Plan
Kroehler Manufacturing
Charlotte, North Carolina
Brownfields Project No. 23081-19-060
H&H Job No. BCP-145
1.0 Introduction
On behalf of BIN – MR3412 LLC (Prospective Developer or PD), Hart & Hickman, PC (H&H)
is providing this Work Plan to conduct Brownfields assessment activities at the Kroehler
Manufacturing Brownfields property (Brownfields Project No. 23081-19-060) located at 3412
Monroe Road in Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, North Carolina (Site or subject Site). The Site
consists of one approximately 6.75-acre parcel of land located in a mixed industrial and
residential area southeast of uptown Charlotte. A Site location map is provided as Figure 1, and
the Site and surrounding area are shown in Figure 2.
The Site is developed with an approximately 121,000-square-foot (sq ft) industrial warehouse
building constructed in 1950. An addition including a lower level basement was constructed on
the southwestern portion of the original warehouse building in the mid to late-1950s. The Site
building consists of a two-story office area, a show room, employee break areas, warehouse
space, two loading dock areas, and an out of use boiler room. Other improvements to the Site
include asphalt parking areas and access drives, outdoor storage areas, former and active railway
spurs, and landscaped and naturally vegetated areas.
A description of the Site history and previous assessment activities completed at the Site is
provided in the following sections.
1.1 Background
Prior to 1950, the Site consisted of undeveloped agricultural land. In the 1950s, the Site was
developed with the existing industrial warehouse facility which was occupied by Kroehler
Manufacturing for furniture manufacturing operations until 1985. Greenline Corporation then
occupied the facility for conveyor component manufacturing operations until the early 2000s.
2
S:\AAA-Master Projects\Beacon Partners- BEP or BCP\BCP-145 Monroe Road\Work Plan\Final to DEQ\23081 - Brownfields Assessment Work Plan_Kroehler Manufacturing.doc
The property is temporarily occupied by Party Reflections, a party equipment rental company.
Monroe Road is located adjacent to the north with residential and commercial use development
located beyond. The adjacent properties located to the east, south, and west consist of primarily
industrial and commercial use development. The adjacent property located to the southeast and
topographically upgradient of the Site was occupied by Atlantic Envelope from the 1960s
through the mid to late 2010s. Historically, the facility received violations related to hazardous
waste generation and handling practices associated with envelope manufacturing operations. No
release incidents were reported in the environmental databases in connection with the Atlantic
Envelope facility.
1.2 Previous Environmental Assessments
In August and September 2019, H&H conducted Phase I and II Environmental Site Assessment
(ESA) activities at the Site. The results of the Phase I and II ESA activities are documented in a
Phase I and II ESA Report prepared by H&H dated October 7, 2019. Results of the Phase I ESA
identified several areas of potential environmental concern based on historical Site uses. Phase
II ESA activities included collection of six soil samples and one downgradient to cross-gradient
groundwater sample for laboratory analysis in areas of concern to evaluate the potential for
impact. The historical sample locations are depicted on Figure 3.
Phase II ESA soil sample laboratory analytical results indicated the presence of volatile organic
compounds (VOCs) and semi-VOCs (SVOCs) at concentrations above the North Carolina
Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) Inactive Hazardous Sites Branch (IHSB)
Protection of Groundwater Preliminary Soil Remediation Goals (PRSGs) in a deep soil sample
(SB-2) collected adjacent to a former sump that was located south of the Site building. A low
level of the polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH) benzo(a)pyrene was detected at a
concentration above the DEQ IHSB Residential PSRG in a soil sample (SB-5) collected adjacent
to one floor drain in the basement in the southern portion of the Site warehouse building. No
compounds were detected at concentrations above the DEQ IHSB Industrial/Commercial PSRGs
in soil samples collected in areas of potential environmental concern at the Site.
3
S:\AAA-Master Projects\Beacon Partners- BEP or BCP\BCP-145 Monroe Road\Work Plan\Final to DEQ\23081 - Brownfields Assessment Work Plan_Kroehler Manufacturing.doc
H&H collected one groundwater sample for laboratory analysis from a temporary groundwater
monitoring well (TMW-2) installed adjacent to the former sump south of the warehouse
building. Groundwater sample laboratory analytical results identified low levels of 1,1-
dichloroethane, benzene, naphthalene, and 1-methylnaphthalene at concentrations above the
DEQ 15A NCAC 2L Groundwater Standards (2L Standards). No other compounds were
detected at concentrations above the 2L Standards, and no compounds were detected in Site
groundwater at concentrations above the DEQ Division of Waste Management (DWM) Vapor
Intrusion Screening Levels (VISLs).
To address environmental concerns at the Site identified during previous assessment activities,
BIN - MR3412 LLC entered the Site into the DEQ Brownfields Program as part of property
transaction due diligence. The Site received a letter of eligibility on February 3, 2020
(Brownfields Project No. 23081-79-060). In addition to entering the Site into the Brownfields
Program, BIN - MR3412 LLC elected to complete a vapor intrusion assessment as part of
property transaction due diligence activities to evaluate the potential for structural vapor
intrusion into the existing Site building. Vapor intrusion assessment activities were completed
by H&H in December 2019 and documented in a Vapor Intrusion Assessment Report dated
February 17, 2020.
Vapor intrusion assessment activities included collection of sub-slab soil vapor samples for
laboratory analysis within the Site building to determine if volatile compounds are present at
levels that pose unacceptable vapor intrusion risks. In addition, co-located sub-slab radon
samples and indoor air radon samples were collected for laboratory analysis to establish
Site-specific attenuation factors from sub-slab vapor to indoor air within the Site building.
Sub-slab soil vapor sample laboratory analytical results indicate that several compounds were
detected at concentrations above the laboratory method detection limits in each sample. No
compounds were detected at concentrations above the DEQ DWM Residential or Non-
Residential Vapor Intrusion Sub-slab and Exterior Soil Gas Screening Levels (SGSLs). This is
consistent with results of previous soil and groundwater assessment activities completed at the
Site.
4
S:\AAA-Master Projects\Beacon Partners- BEP or BCP\BCP-145 Monroe Road\Work Plan\Final to DEQ\23081 - Brownfields Assessment Work Plan_Kroehler Manufacturing.doc
Hypothetical worst-case risk calculator results for the sub-slab soil vapor to indoor air pathway
indicate that calculated cumulative carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic risk are well below the
DEQ and EPA acceptable levels for residential and non-residential uses. Predicted indoor air
concentrations using the most conservative attenuation factor based on the radon measurements
and the highest compound concentrations detected in any sub-slab soil vapor sample also
indicate that no predicted indoor air concentration exceeds the DEQ DWM Residential or Non-
Residential IASLs. As expected, hypothetical worst-case calculated cumulative carcinogenic
and non-carcinogenic risks based on the predicted indoor air concentrations are orders of
magnitude below the DEQ and EPA acceptable levels.
The PD plans to upfit and renovate the Kroehler Manufacturing Brownfields property for
commercial tenant use. Based on conversations with DEQ Brownfields during a kick-off/data
gap meeting held on May 14, 2020, H&H proposes to complete additional groundwater and soil
assessment activities at the Site to further evaluate subsurface conditions for potential impacts.
H&H will also collect background soil samples to establish Site-specific ranges for naturally
occurring metals and will complete receptor survey activities for DEQ Brownfields purposes.
The proposed Brownfields assessment activities are outlined in the following sections.
5
S:\AAA-Master Projects\Beacon Partners- BEP or BCP\BCP-145 Monroe Road\Work Plan\Final to DEQ\23081 - Brownfields Assessment Work Plan_Kroehler Manufacturing.doc
2.0 Brownfields Assessment Activities
H&H will complete soil and groundwater assessment activities to evaluate the potential for
impacts in soil near on-Site rail spurs, establish Site-specific background levels for metals in soil,
and in groundwater at locations upgradient and downgradient of the Site building. A sample
summary table is provided as Table 1.
The proposed assessment activities will be performed in general accordance with the DEQ IHSB
Guidelines for Assessment and Cleanup (Guidelines) dated January 2020, the DEQ DWM Vapor
Intrusion Guidance (VI Guidance) dated March 2018, and most recent versions of the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Region IV Science and Ecosystem Support Division
(SESD) Field Branches Quality System and Technical Procedures guidance.
Prior to conducting field activities, H&H will contact North Carolina 811, the public utility
locator, to mark subsurface utilities located on the Site. H&H will also contract with a private
utility locator to screen proposed sample locations for subgrade utilities that may not be marked
by the public locator. Additionally, boring locations will be hand cleared to approximately 5 feet
(ft) below the ground surface (bgs) prior to use of mechanical drilling equipment to further
screen the boring locations for the presence of subsurface utilities.
In accordance with Mecklenburg County rules, H&H will obtain a Subsurface Investigation
Permit (SIP) from Mecklenburg County prior to temporary monitoring well installation and
sampling. After completion of the assessment activities, H&H will update the SIP on the
Mecklenburg County Well Information database with North Carolina licensed driller temporary
monitoring well abandonment records.
2.1 Receptor Survey
H&H will perform a Brownfields receptor survey in accordance with DEQ Brownfields Program
guidance. The receptor survey will include information about land use in the Site area including
zoning. H&H will also conduct a field search for water supply wells, basements, utility
6
S:\AAA-Master Projects\Beacon Partners- BEP or BCP\BCP-145 Monroe Road\Work Plan\Final to DEQ\23081 - Brownfields Assessment Work Plan_Kroehler Manufacturing.doc
manways and chases, storm sewers, other underground utilities, drains, and surface water within
a 1,500 ft radius of the Brownfield property boundaries. In addition, H&H will review the online
Mecklenburg County Well Information System for potential wells in the area and, if warranted,
contact utility companies for information concerning underground utilities in the immediate area
of the Site. The receptor survey will be completed using the most current version of the
Brownfields Property Receptor Survey form. A copy of a template Brownfields Property
Receptor Survey form is provided as Appendix A.
2.2 Soil Sampling Activities
Review of historical reports and aerial photographs indicates that two rail spurs were formerly
active at the Site (Figure 2). The rail spur located along the southwestern and western Site
boundaries remains an active rail, and an abandoned rail spur is located in the southern and
eastern portions of the Site. H&H proposes to collect two composite soil samples along the
active and inactive rail spurs to evaluate the potential for impact in shallow soil. Background
samples will also be collected in areas that appear to be unaffected by historical uses at the Site.
Background Soil Sampling Activities
H&H proposes to advance two (2) shallow soil borings for collection of soil samples for
laboratory analysis from areas at the Site that do not appear to have been affected by historical
uses to establish ranges for naturally occurring background concentrations of metals. Proposed
background soil boring locations (denoted by BKG nomenclature) are shown in Figure 3.
The soil borings will be advanced utilizing a decontaminated stainless steel hand auger.
Continuous soil samples will be collected from the center of the hand auger bucket at each
boring. Soil samples will be logged for lithological description and field screened for indication
of potential impacts by observation for staining, odors, and the presence of organic vapors using
a calibrated photoionization detector (PID). One soil sample will be collected from each soil
boring for laboratory analysis from a depth interval that is consistent with depths of other
shallow soil samples collected at the Site (i.e., no greater than 3 ft bgs).
7
S:\AAA-Master Projects\Beacon Partners- BEP or BCP\BCP-145 Monroe Road\Work Plan\Final to DEQ\23081 - Brownfields Assessment Work Plan_Kroehler Manufacturing.doc
Following collection, the soil samples will be placed directly into dedicated laboratory supplied
sample containers, labeled with the sample identification, date, time, and requested analysis, and
placed in a laboratory supplied cooler with ice. Soil samples representing background conditions
will be will be submitted to a North Carolina certified laboratory under standard chain of custody
protocols for analysis of Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) metals plus
hexavalent chromium by EPA Methods 6020/7471/7199. In the unlikely event field screening
results indicate the potential for impact in a background soil boring, a grab soil sample will be
collected from the potentially impacted depth interval and submitted for analysis of VOCs by
EPA Method 8260 and SVOCs by EPA Method 8270.
Railroad Spur Soil Sampling Activities
H&H proposes to collect shallow composite soil samples (COMP-1 and COMP-2) for laboratory
analysis to evaluate the potential for impact along the two on-Site railroad spur corridors.
Composite soil sample COMP-1 will be collected to represent soil conditions along the active
railroad spur in the southwestern and western portions of the Site, and COMP-2 will be collected
to represent soil conditions near the out of use rail spur located in the southern and eastern
portions of the Site. Composite soil samples for each railroad spur will be comprised of five (5)
soil samples collected from aliquot soil borings advanced along each rail spur. The aliquot soil
boring locations are shown in Figure 3.
One soil sample will be collected from 0-2 ft bgs at each aliquot soil boring location. The
aliquot soil borings will be advanced using a decontaminated stainless steel hand auger.
Continuous soil samples will be collected from the center of the hand auger bucket at each soil
boring and described for lithologic purposes, observed for the presence of staining and odors,
and field screened for elevated volatile organic vapors using a calibrated PID. The soil sample
aliquots will be combined and homogenized to form one composite soil sample representative of
each rail spur. Soil samples selected for laboratory analysis will be collected directly into
laboratory supplied glassware, labeled with the sample identification, date, time, and requested
analysis and placed in a laboratory supplied cooler with ice. The samples will be delivered to a
North Carolina certified laboratory under standard chain of custody protocols for analysis of
SVOCs by EPA Method 8270 and RCRA metals plus hexavalent chromium by EPA Method
8
S:\AAA-Master Projects\Beacon Partners- BEP or BCP\BCP-145 Monroe Road\Work Plan\Final to DEQ\23081 - Brownfields Assessment Work Plan_Kroehler Manufacturing.doc
6020/7471/7199.
Based on results of field screening, a grab soil sample will be collected from an undisturbed
portion of the aliquot exhibiting the highest likelihood for impact for each rail spur and will be
submitted for laboratory analysis of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by EPA Method 8260.
If field screening results do not identify the obvious presence of impacts in an aliquot soil
sample, the grab samples will be collected from a randomly selected aliquot soil boring in each
evaluation area.
Following sampling activities, the soil borings will be properly abandoned and the surface will
be repaired similar to pre-assessment conditions. Additionally, the soil sample locations will be
estimated using a hand-held global positioning system (GPS) unit.
2.3 Groundwater Sampling Activities
H&H will contract a qualified drilling contractor to advance soil borings for installation of three
(3) temporary groundwater monitoring wells at the Site. Two temporary monitoring wells will
be installed along the northwestern and downgradient side of the Site building, and one
temporary monitoring well will be installed near the southeastern Site boundary on the
upgradient side of the building. Proposed temporary monitoring well locations (denoted by
TMW nomenclature) are shown in Figure 3.
The temporary groundwater monitoring well borings will be advanced with a track-mounted drill
rig capable of utilizing direct push technology (DPT) drilling techniques. If refusal is
encountered prior to reaching the water table in a proposed temporary groundwater monitoring
well location, H&H will instruct the driller to utilize alternative drilling techniques to advance
the boring to depths corresponding to the water table. H&H anticipates the depth to water to be
approximately 30 to 35 ft bgs. During drilling, continuous soil samples will be collected from
each boring and logged for lithologic description and field screened for the presence of staining,
odors, and the presence of organic vapors using a calibrated PID. Each temporary monitoring
well will be constructed of 1- or 2-inch diameter PVC well screen set to bracket the water table
9
S:\AAA-Master Projects\Beacon Partners- BEP or BCP\BCP-145 Monroe Road\Work Plan\Final to DEQ\23081 - Brownfields Assessment Work Plan_Kroehler Manufacturing.doc
and 1- or 2-inch diameter PVC well casing to the ground surface. A sand filter pack will be
placed from the bottom of the borings to approximately 2 ft above the top of the well screens.
The temporary wells will be completed by placing a minimum of 2 ft of hydrated bentonite seal
above the sand filter pack.
Once the temporary monitoring wells are installed, the wells will be allowed to equilibrate to
static conditions, and a decontaminated electronic water level indicator will be used to measure
the depth to the water table relative to the ground surface and to the top of the well casing in each
well. The elevation of the ground surface and top of casing for each well will be surveyed
relative to an on-Site datum. Using the measured depths to the water table and survey
measurements, H&H will calculate groundwater elevations at each well location and estimate
groundwater flow direction at the Site.
The wells will then be developed by removing a minimum of 3 to 5 volumes and until field
parameters have stabilized (pH± 0.1 Standard Units [SU] and conductivity varies no more than
5%). After development, groundwater samples will be collected utilizing low flow/low stress
purging techniques using a peristaltic pump or bladder pump and dedicated polyethylene tubing.
The intake point of the pump tubing will be placed in the approximate mid-portion of the
screened interval of the well, and groundwater will be removed at a rate no greater than 200
milliliters per minute. H&H will utilize water quality meters to collect measurements of pH,
temperature, dissolved oxygen, oxidation reduction potential, turbidity, and specific conductivity
at three to five-minute intervals during the purging process. Purging will be considered complete
when the field parameters stabilize (pH ± 0.1 SU, conductivity varies no more than 5%, and
turbidity is less than 10 Nephelometric Turbidity Units [NTUs]).
Once groundwater parameters stabilize, groundwater samples for VOC analysis will be collected
directly into laboratory supplied sample containers using the “soda straw” method to eliminate
the potential for volatile compound loss through the pump head. Samples collected for the
remaining analyses will be collected directly into laboratory supplied sample containers from the
dedicated sample tubing discharge. The sample containers will be labeled with the sample
identification, date, time, and requested analysis, and placed in a laboratory supplied cooler with
10
S:\AAA-Master Projects\Beacon Partners- BEP or BCP\BCP-145 Monroe Road\Work Plan\Final to DEQ\23081 - Brownfields Assessment Work Plan_Kroehler Manufacturing.doc
ice. The groundwater samples will be delivered to a North Carolina certified laboratory under
standard chain of custody protocols for analyses of VOCs by EPA Method 8260 and SVOCs by
EPA Method 8270, and RCRA metals by EPA Methods 6020/7471.
Following installation and sampling activities, the groundwater sample locations will be
estimated using a hand-held GPS unit. Following surveying activities, the temporary monitoring
wells will be properly abandoned by a licensed well driller.
2.4 Quality Assurance – Quality Control
Non-dedicated equipment and tools will be decontaminated prior to use at each boring or
sampling location or following exposure to soil or groundwater. The following samples will be
collected for quality assurance/quality control (QA/QC) purposes:
One duplicate soil sample will be collected and analyzed for the same parameters as the
parent sample.
One duplicate groundwater sample will be collected and analyzed for the same
parameters as the parent sample.
One trip blank will accompany the groundwater samples during sampling activities and
during sample shipment. The trip blank will be analyzed for VOCs by EPA
Method 8260.
Laboratory QA/QC procedures will be employed to ensure appropriate sample handling and
analysis and to aid in the review and validation of the analytical data. QA/QC procedures will be
conducted in accordance with the method protocols and will include regular equipment
maintenance, equipment calibrations, and adherence to specific sample custody and data
management procedures. Samples will be analyzed in conjunction with appropriate blanks,
laboratory duplicates, continuing calibration standards, surrogate standards, and matrix spiking
standards in accordance with approved methodologies to monitor both instrument and analyst
performance. Laboratory reporting limits for each analyte will be at or below appropriate
screening criteria, where possible. Additionally, H&H will request that the laboratory include
estimated concentrations for compounds that are detected at levels above the laboratory method
11
S:\AAA-Master Projects\Beacon Partners- BEP or BCP\BCP-145 Monroe Road\Work Plan\Final to DEQ\23081 - Brownfields Assessment Work Plan_Kroehler Manufacturing.doc
detection limit, but below the laboratory reporting limit (J flags).
The laboratory analytical data report and QA package for each group of samples submitted to
and analyzed by the subcontracted laboratory will be provided in an appendix to the final report.
Laboratory QA data consistent with Level II documentation will be provided for this project.
A copy of the completed chain-of-custody record and shipping receipt will be appended to the
corresponding laboratory analytical report included with the final report.
2.6 Investigation Derived Waste
Investigation derived waste (IDW) generated during the proposed assessment activities will be
managed in general accordance with DEQ IHSB Guidelines. IDW generated during the
assessment activities will be thin spread on-Site. However, if significant impacts are suspected
(i.e., elevated PID readings, free-product, etc.) soil cuttings and groundwater will be
containerized in 55-gallon drums and staged on-Site pending analytical results of a composite
IDW sample. Based on laboratory analytical results of IDW samples, the drums will be
transported off-Site to a suitable facility for disposal.
2.7 Reporting
Following completion of the assessment activities and receipt of the analytical data, H&H will
document our findings in a Brownfields assessment report. The report will include a description
of the sampling activities, a figure depicting sample locations, soil boring logs, temporary
monitoring well construction details, laboratory analytical data, a discussion of the data in
comparison to regulatory screening levels, and conclusions and recommendations concerning our
activities.
Table 1Sample Summary TableKroehler ManufacturingCharlotte, North Carolina Brownfields Project No. 23081-19-060H&H Project No. BCP-145COMP-1 and COMP-2 Soil Evaluate Soil Conditions Near Rail Spurs 3 0 to 3 2VOCs (8260), semi-VOCs (8270), RCRA metals (6020/7471), and hexavalent chromium (7199)BKG-1 and BKG-2 SoilEstablish Site-specific BackgroundMetal Concentrations5 varies 2RCRA metals (6020/7471) and hexavalent chromium (7199)TMW-3 through TMW-5 Groundwater Evaluate Groundwater Conditions 30-35 20 to 30 3VOCs (8260), semi-VOCs (8270), RCRA metals (6020/7470A)SB-DUP Soil QA/QC 5 0 to 3 1VOCs (8260), semi-VOCs (8270), RCRA metals (6020/7471), and hexavalent chromium (7199)GW-DUP Groundwater QA/QC 25 20 to 30 1VOCs (8260), semi-VOCs (8270), RCRA metals (6020/7470A)Trip Blank Trip Blank QA/QC NA NA 1 VOCs (8260)Notes:EPA Method Number Follows Laboratory Parameter in ParenthesisVOCs = Volatile Organic Compounds; RCRA = Resource Conservation Recovery Actft = feet; QA/QC = Quality Assurance/ Quality Control; NA = Not ApplicableSample IDsApproximate Boring Depth (ft)Number of SamplesLaboratory AnalysisSample ObjectiveSample TypeApproximate Sample Depth (ft)S:\AAA‐Master Projects\Beacon Partners‐ BEP or BCP\BCP‐145 Monroe Road\Work Plan\Sample Summary Table.xlsxTable 1Hart & Hickman, PC
TITLE
PROJECT
SITE LOCATION MAP
KROEHLER MANUFACTURING3412 MONROE ROAD CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA
DATE:
JOB NO:
REVISION NO:
FIGURE:
2-7-2020 0
1BCP-145
SITE
0 2000 4000
APPROXIMATE
SCALE IN FEETN
U.S.G.S. QUADRANGLE MAP
QUADRANGLE
7.5 MINUTE SERIES (TOPOGRAPHIC)
CHARLOTTE EAST, NC, 1991
706704
702700 696
708
710
70
8 712714712710714716
718
7
0
4
7
0
67087107
0
4
7
0
2
70
0
698
696
696
694
692
7
0
6704702700
698
698
REVISION NO. 0
JOB NO. BCP-145
DATE: 6-4-20
FIGURE NO. 2
KROEHLER MANUFACTURING
3412 MONROE ROAD
CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA
SITE MAP
LEGEND
BROWNFIELDS PROPERTY BOUNDARY
RAILROAD
TOPOGRAPHIC CONTOUR AND
ELEVATION (FT ABOVE MSL)
2923 South Tryon Street-Suite 100
Charlotte, North Carolina 28203
704-586-0007(p) 704-586-0373(f)
License # C-1269 / #C-245 Geology
704
MO
N
R
O
E
R
O
A
DMO
N
R
O
E
R
O
A
D
CHIPL
E
Y
A
V
E
N
U
E
CHIPL
E
Y
A
V
E
N
U
E
FOR
T
U
N
E
S
T
R
E
E
T
FOR
T
U
N
E
S
T
R
E
E
T
DOMI
N
O C
O
U
R
T
DOMI
N
O
C
O
U
R
T
PRO AM DRIVEPRO AM DRIVELAT
R
O
B
E
D
R
I
V
E
LAT
R
O
B
E
D
R
I
V
E
NOTES:
1.AERIAL IMAGERY AND LIDAR ELEVATION DATA
OBTAINED FROM MECKLENBURG COUNTY GIS
(2019).
2.FT ABOVE MSL = FEET ABOVE MEAN SEA LEVEL
CAROLINA PRODUCTS
(1132 PRO AM DRIVE)
THE DOG KNOWLEDGE
(1110 PRO AM DRIVE)
ATLANTIC SELF STORAGE AND
PENSKE TRUCK RENTAL
(3434 MONROE ROAD)
(FORMER ATLANTIC ENVELOPE)
TECHNOCOM
(3330 MONROE ROAD)
ATLANTIC SWEETENER
(512 DOMINO COURT)
RESIDENTIAL
LOADING DOCKS
LOADING DOCKS
FORMER DRUM STORAGE
BUILDING AND SUMP
LOWER LEVEL
BASEMENT
ABANDONED
RAILROAD SPUR
ACTIVE
RAILROAD SPUR
S:\AAA-Master Projects\Beacon Partners- BEP or BCP\BCP-145 Monroe Road\Figures\BF Site Map.dwg, 6/11/2020 1:46:30 PM, amckenzie
IAR-4
SSR-4
SSV-4
IAR-3
SSR-3SSV-3
IAR-2
SSR-2SSV-2
IAR-1
SSR-1SSV-1
SB-5
SB-4
SB-3
SB-6
TMW-2/SB-2
TMW-1/SB-1
COMP-2
COMP-1
TMW-3
TMW-4
TMW-5
BKG-2
BKG-1
REVISION NO. 0
JOB NO. BCP-145
DATE: 6-4-20
FIGURE NO. 3
KROEHLER MANUFACTURING
3412 MONROE ROAD
CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA
HISTORICAL AND PROPOSED
SAMPLE LOCATION MAP
LEGEND
BROWNFIELDS PROPERTY BOUNDARY
RAILROAD
FLOOR DRAIN
HISTORICAL SOIL BORING LOCATION
(SEPTEMBER 2019)
HISTORICAL CO-LOCATED SOIL
BORING/TEMPORARY MONITORING WELL
LOCATION (SEPTEMBER 2019)
HISTORICAL SUB-SLAB SOIL VAPOR
MONITORING POINT (DECEMBER 2019)
HISTORICAL CO-LOCATED SUB-SLAB AND
INDOOR AIR RADON SAMPLE LOCATION
(DECEMBER 2019)
PROPOSED ALIQUOT SOIL BORING LOCATION
PROPOSED BACKGROUND SOIL BORING
LOCATION
PROPOSED TEMPORARY GROUNDWATER
MONITORING WELL LOCATION
2923 South Tryon Street-Suite 100
Charlotte, North Carolina 28203
704-586-0007(p) 704-586-0373(f)
License # C-1269 / #C-245 GeologyMO
N
R
O
E
R
O
A
DMO
N
R
O
E
R
O
A
D
CHIPL
E
Y
A
V
E
N
U
E
CHIPL
E
Y
A
V
E
N
U
E
FOR
T
U
N
E
S
T
R
E
E
T
FOR
T
U
N
E
S
T
R
E
E
T
DOMI
N
O C
O
U
R
T
DOMI
N
O
C
O
U
R
T
PRO AM DRIVEPRO AM DRIVELAT
R
O
B
E
D
R
I
V
E
LAT
R
O
B
E
D
R
I
V
E
NOTES:
1.AERIAL IMAGERY AND LIDAR ELEVATION DATA
OBTAINED FROM MECKLENBURG COUNTY GIS (2019).
2.PREVIOUS SOIL AND GROUNDWATER SAMPLES
COLLECTED BY H&H IN SEPTEMBER 2019.
3.SUB-SLAB SOIL VAPOR AND RADON SAMPLES
COLLECTED BY H&H IN DECEMBER 2019.S:\AAA-Master Projects\Beacon Partners- BEP or BCP\BCP-145 Monroe Road\Figures\BF Site Map.dwg, 6/4/2020 2:38:20 PM, amckenzie
Appendix A Template Brownfields Property Receptor Survey Form
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Waste Management
Brownfields Program
Site:
Address:
City:
County:
Brownfields Project Number:
Date
Property and Building Characteristics
a. Provide occupancy and use information.
c. Describe the foundation construction. Include details on type, floor construction, and depth below grade.
e. Are any subslab ventilation systems or moisture barriers in place? If so, please provide details.
NASize of Property (acres)
% of property that is wooded/brush
BROWNFIELDS PROPERTY RECEPTOR SURVEY
This form was created to clarify and simplify preparing a receptor survey for a brownfield site. Please provide the
information requested below. Distances are measured from the site property boundary unless otherwise indicated
by the DEQ Brownfield’s Project Manager (PM).
Current Usage Proposed UsageSurface Conditions
% of property that is grassed areas
% of property that is agricultural crops
% of property that is paved
d. Describe the HVAC system in the building. Include available details on type, equipment location, source of air
return, and design considerations (e.g. positive pressure?).
If an existing building is on-site, please respond to the following. Information can be provided on additional sheets
as needed. If numerous buildings are on-site, consult with your PM as only information on specific buildings may
be needed.
b. Describe the construction of the builidng including materials (e.g. wood frame, block), type and size of openings
(e.g. windows, bay doors), and height (number of stories).
% of property that is covered by buildings
Rev. 09/2015 Page 1 of 3
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Waste Management
Brownfields Program
Surrounding Property Land Use
North
South
East
West
Utilities
Is there a septic system on-site? (Y or N) _________
Please provide the utility providers for the subject property
a. Natural Gas ___________________________
b. Sewer ___________________________
c. Electricity ___________________________
d. Other __________________________
For surrounding properties, please complete the following table with available information.
Zoning/Land Use
DirectionDistance
(ft)Address
* If yes, please provide a map or detailed information (distance, direction, depth) of the utility in correlation with
the subject property.
Is a water line main within 100 ft of Property boundary?
Is a natural gas line main within 100 ft of the Property boundary?
Is a buried telephone/ cable main within 100 ft of the Property boundary?
Is a septic system leach field within 500 ft of the Property boundary?
Direction
Is there a basement within 1,000 ft of the Property
Please provide information on the following land uses in the vicinity of the subject site, including a map of the
surrounding areas. If specific receptors are present, please provide addresses of the facilities.
Proposed Usage Current Use/Occupant
For the subject property, please provide a map of known buried utilites. If available, include depth to top,
construction material, and diameter of the utilities. In addition, please provide the following information on utilty
providers. If additional assessment is required, the public utility locators should be contacted. This information
can then be added to a site map.
Y/N *
Is a school or daycare center within 1,000 ft of the
Property?
Specific Land Uses of Interest Y/N *
* If numerous facilities of interest are present, their locations can be placed on a map in lieu of providing specific
addresses.
Distance
(ft)
Is there a residence within 1,000 ft of the Property?
Utility/Potential Receptor
Is a buried electrical cable main within 100 ft of Property boundary?
Is a storm water pipe within 100 ft of the Property boundary?
Is a sanitary sewer within 100 ft of the Property boundary?
Rev. 09/2015 Page 2 of 3
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Waste Management
Brownfields Program
Water Supply
What is the potable water supply for the property? Public ______ Private ______
Surface Water & Wetlands
Distance
(ft)Direction AddressY/NWater Supply Wells
Please provide the following information regarding water supply wells in the vicinity of the Property. At a
minimum, a windshield survey within 1,500 ft of the property boundaries should be completed to determine if
water supply or irrigation wells may be present. Information from applicable databases can and should be
utilized; however, should not be utilized in lieu of the windshield survey. If multiple wells are present within the
requested radius, please provide a map of the well locations. If needed, please attach a separate table to list all
wells. Please note, the PM may opt for a more extensive water supply well survey if needed.
Are there surface water features on the
property? (If yes, please complete a. to d.)
Provide Information regarding Surface Water
and Wetlands
If Private, please provide details of the water supply source (i.e. well location, well construction, etc). If public,
please include the water providers name.
a. Is the water body naturally developed or
man-made?
Is a public water supply well within 1 mile of the Property boundary?
Is a private water supply well within 1,500 ft of the Property
boundary?Is an irrigation well within 1,500 ft of the Property boundary?
Response/Comments
The purpose of this section is to provide information on the presence of surface waters and/or wetlands on, or in
the vicinity of the Property.
The purpose of this section is to provide information on the water supply for the site and surrounding areas.
b. List the uses of the water body.
c. What is the source of the water for the
water body?
d. What is the nature of the bottom of the
water body (e.g., rocky or concrete bottom,
drainage ways or impoundments)
If no on-site surface water features, what is the
nearest surface water body?
Are there any wetlands present on the
property? If no wetlands on-site, are wetlands
suspected on adjoining properties?
Rev. 09/2015 Page 3 of 3