3404_Forsyth_Kernersville_MSWLF_Nov2020LFG_FID1527733_20210203

I pENR USE ONLY []Paper Report ❑Electronic Data - Email CD (data loaded: Yes / No) Doc/Event #:
'NC DENR Environmental Monitoring
Division of Waste Management - Solid Waste Reporting Form
Notice: This form and any information attached to it are "Public Records" as defined in NC General Statute 132-1. As such, these documents are
available for inspection and examination by any person upon request (NC General Statute 132-6).
Instructions:
Prepare one form for each individually monitored unit
Please type or print legibly.
Attach a notification table with values that attain or exceed NC 2L groundwater standards or NC 2B surface water standards. The notification
must include a preliminary analysis of the cause and significance of each value. (e.g. naturally occurring, off -site source, pre-existing
condition, etc.).
Attach a notification table of any groundwater or surface water values that equal or exceed the reporting limits.
Attach a notification table of any methane gas values that attain or exceed explosive gas levels. This includes any structures on or nearby the
facility (NCAC 13B .1629 (4)(a)(i).
Send the original signed and sealed form, any tables, and Electronic Data Deliverable to: Compliance Unit, NCDENR-DWM, Solid Waste
Section, 1646 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1646.
Solid Waste Monitoring Data Submittal Information
Name of entity submitting data (laboratory, consultant, facility owner):
WithersRavenel, Inc.
Contact for questions about data formatting. Include data preparers name, telephone number and E-mail address:
Name: Mark Brown, LG, PG, RSM
E-mail: [e-mail]
Phone: [phone]
NC Landfill Rule: Actual sampling dates (e.g.,
Facility name: Facility Address: Facility Permit # (.0500 or. 1600) October 20-24, 2006)
Freeman Road Nov. 2, 2020;
'Town of Kernersville Landfill iernersville, NC 27284 34-04 .1600 Nov. 25, 2020;
Dec. 30, 2020
Environmental Status: (Check all that apply)
❑ Initial/Background Monitoring �X Detection Monitoring Assessment Monitoring ❑ Corrective Action
of data submitted: (Check all that apply)
Groundwater monitoring data from monitoring wells ❑X
Groundwater monitoring data from private water supply wells ❑
Leachate monitoring data
Surface water monitoring data ❑
Methane gas monitoring data
Corrective action data (specify)
Other(specify)
Notification attached?
❑ No. No groundwater or surface water standards were exceeded.
Yes, a notification of values exceeding a .yrouridwater or surface water standard is attached. It includes a list of groundwater and surface water
monitoring points, dates, analytical values, NC 2L groundwater standard, NC 2B surface water standard or NC Solid Waste GWPS and
preliminary analysis of the cause and significance of any concentration.
0 Yes, a notification of values exceeding an explosive methane gas limit is attached. It includes the methane monitoring points, dates, sample
values and explosive methane gas limits.
Certification
To the best of my knowledge, the Information reported and statements made on this data submittal and attachments are true and correct.
Furthermore, I have attached complete notification of any sampling values meeting or exceeding groundwater standards or explosive gas
levels, and a preliminary analysis of the cause and significance of concentrations exceeding groundwater standards. I am aware that there
are significant penalties for making any false statement, representation, or certification including the possibility of a fine and imprisonment.
Mark Brown, LG, PG, RSM
Name (Print)
Project Geologist
Title
919.608.4582
(Area Code) Telephone Number
February 3, 2021
Signature / Date
424 Gallirpbre Dairy Road, Suite C, Greensboro, NC 27409
Facility Representative Address
C-082
NC PE Firm License Number (if applicable effective May 1, 2009)
Revised 6/2009
Affix NC lscen,l [ C♦�jg7§ yii nal Geologist Seal
•r
�EAL

QUARTERLY METHANE MONITORING REPORT
Town of Kernersville Closed Landfill
Permit Number 34-04
Kernersville, North Carolina
4th Quarter 2020
METHANE MONITORING DATA
4th QUARTER 2020 (OCTOBER - DECEMBER)
Facility Name: Town of Kernersville Closed LF Permit Number:
Sampling Dates: 11/02/20 1 11/25/20 1 12/30/20 Sampled by:
34-04
L. Elliott
Probe ID
October 2020
November 2020
December 2020
Notes
CH4 (%vol.)
CH4 (%LEL)
CH4 (%vol.)
CH4 (%LEL)
CH4 (%vol.)
CH4 (%LEL)
G W-5
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
GW-1
31.7
634.0
35.0
700.0
40.0
800.0
Over LEL
GW-2R
54.1
1082.0
60.1
1202.0
59.6
1192.0
Over LEL
GW-4
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
G W-6
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
GW-3
NS
NS
NS
G W-7
0.0
0.0
0.2
4.0
0.1
2.0
GW-8
NS
NS
NS
GP-9
NS
NS
NS
GP-10
NS
NS
NS
GP-11
NS
NS
NS
Notes:
GW = Gas Well -Town of Kernersville LFG monitoring location
GP = Gas Probe - LFG monitoring location shared with Waste Management Piedmont site.
NS = Probe not sampled during this monthly sampling event
4th Quarter 2020
Methane (CH4) Gas LEL Exceedances
LFG Probes GW-1 and GW-2R
100.0
50.0
0.0
October 2020 November 2020 December 2020
tGW-1 tGW-2R
Town of Kernersville Closed Landfill WithersRavenel
Permit No. 34-04 Page 1 of 1 4th Quarter 2020

Q
� o
�a�a goo �-
E�
I At
� C'fN RD
o f
SMOKE HO
{
90o �aI�
LQp
I
G IC SCALE—`
I 50 - 1000
;Wh,rh = 1000 rt.
TOWN OF KERNERSVILLE DRAWN BY: SCALE: FIGURENO:
W i t h e rs Ra ve n e l CLOSED LANDFILL - PERMIT #34-04 MDF 1"=1000 ' 1
VA rp GOODWILL CHURCH ROAD
Engineers I Planners I Surveyors KERNERSVILLE GUILFORD/FORSYTH COUNTY NC APPROVEDBY: DATE: PROJECTNO.
115 MacKenan Drivel Cary, NC 27511l t 919,46933401 li-9:C-08321 www.with—ravenel.cam GENERAL LOCATION MAP 5MB 10/18/2016 06140180.11
Mt\��V�-0�60U�0�60.��-suwsr�e M-ee. SL" Vl%CM\:0161016-Oreap- Dn 14 2o16 - r[K[R. WKg

GP-11
GW-5
LEGEND
FACILITY BOUNDARY
WASTE DISPOSAL BOUNDARY
. LANDFILL GAS WELL - TOWN OF KERNERSVILLE
AL LANDFILL GAS PROBE-WA+1 PIEDMONT
NOTES:
1.) 2014 AERIAL OBTAINED FROM THE LOCAL COUNTY GIS DEPARTMENT.
2.) PARCEL INFORMATION OBTAINED FROM GUILFORD AND FORSYTH COUNTY GIS DEPARTMENTS.
G000n I L L CHURCH RI
GRAPHIC SCALE
a 1 0 2aa 4 0
1 inch = 200 ft.
,. TOWN OF KERNERSVILLE ORAWNEY. SCALE. P1GURENO.:
■■W i t h e rs Ra ve n e l CLOSED LANDFILL - PERMIT #34-04 LANDFILL GAS PROBE MDF 1"=200' 2
Engineers I Planners I Surveyors GOODWILL CHURCH ROAD LOCATION MAP FPPROVEDEY: DATE. PROJEUNO
Nez�szi�r9z9av9syao�r�e��eH:e-0ssz��•xx.x�me�sT�e�ei.... KERNERSVILLE,GUILFORD/FORSYTHCOUNTY, INC SMB 10/18/2016 06140180.11
N',1h1��11itl�IWItlIL11 tl-M %1 fll%fA A111t11}la 8M&a..- 02dW 16 M116 - MCM Wd

■■ WithersRavenel
kiio Our People. Your Success
PROBE NO: GW-1
TOTAL DEPTH.- feet (TD)
a
LOCATION:
WEATHER CONDITIONS:
PURGING:
VAPOR PROBE FIELD MEASUREMENT LOG
PAGE 1 OF I
PROJECT: Kernersville Closed Landfill 34-04
PROJECT NO 6140180.39
DATE: November 2, 2020
SAMPLER: L. Elliott
Air Temperature
Barometric Pressure (Stable, Rising, or Falling)
Relative Humidity Ambient Air 12-1,!� '�Q
Moisture Description Sampling Zone (Dry, Moist, or Flooded)
Calculated Purge Volume (in CCs)
Purge Pump/Device & Purge Rate in CCs
Time Purge Initiated
Purge Volume @ Observed Stabilization (in CCs)
Time Readings Began
300 CC/minute (GEM 2000 --300 CC/minute,
tEos-b MiniRae 2000 -400 CC/minute,
MiniRae 3000 -500 CC/minute,
SKC Pump Varies)
LF Gas Meter Readings:
Methane (CH4 in %)
Methane LEL (in %) �W>
Carbon Dioxide (CO2 in %)
Oxygen (02 in %) O.b
Hydrogen Sulfide (H2S in PPM)
Mercury (Hg in ug/M3) NA
VOCs by PID (in PPM) NA
Purge Computation:
Meter Type in Use
GEM 5000 +
GEM 5000 +
GEM 5000 +
GEM 5000 +
GEM 5000 +
NA
NA
COMMENTS:
Calibration Notes: Were Meters Calibrated in the Field Prior to Usage? �{ No
Is Calibration Log Current? No
Meter Notes:
Have all Meter Model and Serial Numbers been Recoded in Field Log? / No
Do Meters Appear to be Functioning Properly at this Time? Yes / No
Additional Notes:
Lr-La Hrobe t31ank Logs_11022020.xls

It■ WithersRavenel
Williq Our People. Your Success
PROBE NO
TOTAL DEPTH
LOCATION:
GW-2R
�p feet (TD)
WEATHER CONDITIONS:
VAPOR PROBE FIELD MEASUREMENT LOG
PAGE k OF I
PROJECT: Kernersville Closed Landfill 34-04
PROJECT NO: 6140180.39
DATE: November 2, 2020
SAMPLER: L. Elliott
Air Temperature loo ` D c
Barometric Pressure (Stable Rising, or Falling)
Relative Humidity Ambient Air [Ab
Moisture Description Sampling Zone fqmh (Dry, Moist, or Flooded)
PURGING:
Calculated Purge Volume (in CCs)
Purge Pump/Device & Purge Rate in CCs
Time Purge Initiated
Purge Volume @ Observed Stabilization (in CCs)
Time Readings Began
ipb cL
300 CC/minute (GEM 2000 --300 CC/minute,
L'bo MiniRae 2000 -•400 CC/minute,
MiniRae 3000 -•500 CC/minute,
SKC Pump Varies)
LF Gas Meter Readings:
Methane (CH4 in %)
Methane LEL (in %)
Carbon Dioxide (CO2 in %)
Oxygen (02 in %) D ID
Hydrogen Sulfide (H2S in PPM) 0
Mercury (Hg in ug/M3) NA
VOCs by PID (in PPM) NA
Purge Computation:
Meter Type in Use:
GEM 5000 +
GEM 5000 +
GEM 5000 +
GEM 5000 +
GEM 5000 +
NA
NA
COMMENTS:
Calibration Notes: Were Meters Calibrated in the Field Prior to Usage? Yes No
Is Calibration Log Current? Yes 1 No
Meter Notes:
Have all Meter Model and Serial Numbers been Recoded in Field Log? Yes 1 No
Do Meters Appear to be Functioning Properly at this Time? Ye / No
Additional Notes:
Lr-U NrOUS tslanK LOgs_11022020AS

Wit'hersRavenel
Our People. Your Success
PROBE NO
TOTAL DEPTH:.
LOCATION:
GW-3
feet (TD)
WEATHER CONDITIONS:
Air Temperature
Barometric Pressure
Relative Humidity Ambient Air
Moisture Description Sampling Zone
PURGING:
Calculated Purge Volume (in CCs)
VAPOR PROBE FIELD MEASUREMENT LOG
PAGE OF
PROJECT: Kernersville Closed Landfill 34-04
PROJECT NO: 6140180.39
DATE: November 2, 2020
SAMPLER: L. Elliott
(Stable, Rising, or Falling)
(Dry, Moist, or Flooded)
Purge Pump/Device & Purge Rate in CCs 300 CC/minute
(GEM 2000 --300 CC/minute,
Time Purge Initiated
MiniRae 2000 -400 CC/minute,
Purge Volume @ Observed Stabilization (in CCs)
MiniRae 3000 --500 CC/minute,
Time Readings Began
SKC Pump Varies)
LF Gas Meter Readings:
Meter Type in Use:
Methane (CH4 in %)
GEM 5000 +
Methane LEL (in %)
GEM 5000 +
Carbon Dioxide (CO2 in %)
GEM 5000 +
Oxygen (02 in %)
GEM 5000 +
Hydrogen Sulfide (H2S in PPM)
GEM 5000 +
Mercury (Hg in ug/M3) NA
NA
VOCs by PID (in PPM) NA
NA
Purge Computation:
COMMENTS:
Calibration Notes: Were Meters Calibrated in the Field Prior to Usage? Yes / No
Is Calibration Log Current? Yes / No
Meter Notes:
Have all Meter Model and Serial Numbers been Recoded in Field Log? Yes / No
Do Meters Appear to be Functioning Properly at this Time? Yes / No
Additional Notes:
Rlank Lons 11022020.xls

■■ WithersRavenet
NoOur People. Your Success
PROBE NO GW-4
TOTAL DEPTH: feet (TD)
LOCATION -
WEATHER CONDITIONS:
VAPOR PROBE FIELD MEASUREMENT LOG
PAGE I OF I
PROJECT: Kernersville Closed Landfill 34-04
PROJECT NO. 6140180.39
DATE: November 2, 2020
SAMPLER: L. Elliott
Air Temperature � ) + b�
Barometric Pressure ZA1. (Stabl , Rising, or Falling)
Relative Humidity Ambient Air
Moisture Description Sampling Zone ' (Dry, Moist, or Flooded)
PURGING:
Calculated Purge Volume (in CCs) rlbb
Purge Pump/Device & Purge Rate in CCs 300 CC/minute (GEM 2000 -300 CC/minute,
Time Purge Initiated MiniRae 2000 -400 CC/minute,
Purge Volume @ Observed Stabilization (in CCs) �+ '�� MiniRae 3000 --500 CC/minute,
Time Readings Began?.' SKC Pump Varies)
LF Gas Meter Readings: Meter Type in Use.
Methane (CH4 in %) ` (� GEM 5000 +
Methane LEL (in %) GEM 5000 +
Carbon Dioxide (CO2 in %) GEM 5000 +
Oxygen (02 in %) �GEM 5000 +
Hydrogen Sulfide (HzS in PPM) GEM 5000 +
Mercury (Hg in ug/M3) NA NA
VOCs by PID (in PPM) NA NA
Purge Computation -
COMMENTS:
Calibration Notes: Were Meters Calibrated in the Field Prior to Usage? t
!No
Is Calibration Log Current? 1 No
Meter Notes:
Have all Meter Model and Serial Numbers been Recoded in Field Log? Y 1 No
Do Meters Appear to be Functioning Properly at this Time? Yes No
Additional Notes:
LFG Prone Blank Logs_11022020.xis

WithersRavenel
Our People. Your Success
PROBE NO GW-5R
TOTAL DEPTH: feet (TD)
LOCATION:
WEATHER CONDITIONS:
VAPOR PROBE FIELD MEASUREMENT LOG
PAGE OF[
PROJECT: Kernersville Closed Landfill 34-04
PROJECT NO: 6140180.39
DATE: November 2, 2020
SAMPLER: L. Elliott
Air Temperature
Barometric Pressure (Stab Rising, or Falling)
Relative Humidity Ambient Air 11,
Moisture Description Sampling Zone df s (Dry, Moist, or Flooded)
PURGING:
Calculated Purge Volume (in CCs)
Purge Pump/Device & Purge Rate in CCs
Time Purge Initiated
Purge Volume @ Observed Stabilization (in CCs)
Time Readings Began
►1 ,
300 CC/minute (GEM 2000 -300 CC/minute,
MiniRae 2000 -400 CC/minute,
bb MiniRae 3000 -500 CC/minute,
t [7� SKC Pump Varies)
LF Gas Meter Readings: Meter Type in Use
Methane (CH4 in %) GEM 5000 +
Methane LEL (in %) b GEM 5000 +
Carbon Dioxide (CO2 in %) 1 GEM 5000 +
Oxygen (02 in %) 21 GEM 5000 +
Hydrogen Sulfide (H2S in PPM) b GEM 5000 +
Mercury (Hg in ug/M3) NA NA
VOCs by PID (in PPM) NA NA
Purge Computation:
COMMENTS:
Calibration Notes: Were Meters Calibrated in the Field Prior to Usage? / No
Is Calibration Log Current? Y / No
Meter Notes:
Have all Meter Model and Serial Numbers been Recoded in Field Log? a
/No
Do Meters Appear to be Functioning Properly at this Time? // No
Additional Notes
LrV rI VVC U101 In _UqP_ I i--U.—

■■ WithersRavenel
NoOur People. Your Success
PROBE NO: GW-7
TOTAL DEPTH: e:�b_' feet (TD)
LOCATION:
WEATHER CONDITIONS:
PURGING:
VAPOR PROBE FIELD MEASUREMENT LOG
PAGE _LOF_L
PROJECT: Kernersville Closed Landfill 34-04
PROJECT NO: 6140180.39
DATE: November 2, 2020
SAMPLER: L. Elliott
Air Temperature w' !�6 .yr
Barometric Pressure 4 L/ L (Stable Rising, or Falling)
Relative Humidity Ambient Air /L3,51)6
Moisture Description Sampling Zone
Calculated Purge Volume (in CCs)
Purge Pump/Device & Purge Rate in CCs
Time Purge Initiated
Purge Volume @ Observed Stabilization (in CCs)
Time Readings Began
(Dry, Moist, or Flooded)
� 11
300 CC/minute (GEM 2000 -300 CC/minute,
1 ss2 MiniRae 2000 -400 CC/minute,
MiniRae 3000 -500 CC/minute,
�j SKC Pump Varies)
LF Gas Meter Readings: Meter Type in Use:
Methane (CH4 in %) C ' o GEM 5000 +
Methane LEL (in %) p GEM 5000 +
Carbon Dioxide (CO2 in %) GEM 5000 +
Oxygen (02 in %) ' GEM 5000 +
Hydrogen Sulfide (H2S in PPM) GEM 5000 +
Mercury (Hg in ug/m3) NA NA
VOCs by PID (in PPM) NA NA
Purge Computation:
COMMENTS:
Calibration Notes: Were Meters Calibrated in the Field Prior to Usage? Ye 1 No
Is Calibration Log Current? Yes No
Meter Notes:
Have all Meter Model and Serial Numbers been Recoded in Field Log?
Do Meters Appear to be Functioning Properly at this Time?
Additional Notes:
1 No
Ye 1 No
LFU Probe Blank Logs_11022020.xls

WithersRavenel
Our People. Your Success
PROBE NO GW-6
TOTAL DEPTH feet (TD)
LOCATION:
WEATHER CONDITIONS:
PURGING:
VAPOR PROBE FIELD MEASUREMENT LOG
PAGEOF�
PROJECT: Kernersville Closed Landfill 34-04
PROJECT NO 6140180.39
DATE: November 2, 2020
SAMPLER: L. Elliott
Air Temperature
Barometric Pressure (Stable, Rising, or Falling)
Relative Humidity Ambient Air
Moisture Description Sampling Zone (Dry, Moist, or Flooded)
Calculated Purge Volume (in CCs) J5 2b tz'
Purge Pump/Device & Purge Rate in CCs 300 CC/minute (GEM 2000 --300 CC/minute,
Time Purge Initiated 1 MiniRae 2000 —400 CC/minute,
Purge Volume @ Observed Stabilization (in CCs) -D MiniRae 3000 —500 CC/minute,
Time Readings Began I Q(Q SKC Pump Varies)
LF Gas Meter Readings:
Meter Type in Use:
Methane (CH4 in %)
DID
GEM 5000 +
Methane LEL (in %)
GEM 5000 +
Carbon Dioxide (CO2 in %)
GEM 5000 +
Oxygen (02 in %)
`
GEM 5000 +
Hydrogen Sulfide (H2S in PPM)
GEM 5000 +
Mercury (Hg in ug/M3)
NA
NA
VOCs by PID (in PPM)
NA
NA
Purge Computation:
COMMENTS:
Calibration Notes: Were Meters Calibrated in the Field Prior to Usage? Yes J No
Is Calibration Log Current? Yes No
Meter Notes:
Have all Meter Model and Serial Numbers been Recoded in Field Log? Yes 1 No
Do Meters Appear to be Functioning Properly at this Time? Yes / No
Additional Notes
LrU rrooe esianK Logs_i 1u44vcu.x1s

WithersRavenel
Our People. Your Success
PROBE NO GW-1
TOTAL DEPTH: 3 ' feet (TD)
LOCATION:
WEATHER CONDITIONS:
PURGING:
VAPOR PROBE FIELD MEASUREMENT LOG
PAGE ( OF I
PROJECT: Kernersville Closed Landfill 34-04
PROJECT NO: 6140180.39
DATE: November 25, 2020
SAMPLER: L. Elliott
Air Temperature (mas, -' ° F
Barometric Pressure qz-9 (Stable, Rising, or Falling)
Relative Humidity Ambient Air 43 A6
Moisture Description Sampling Zone A ,),i (Dry, Moist, or Flooded)
Calculated Purge Volume (in CCs)
Purge Pump/Device & Purge Rate in CCs
Time Purge Initiated
Purge Volume @ Observed Stabilization (in CCs)
Time Readings Began
'36d ee -
300 CC/minute (GEM 2000 --300 CC/minute,
b$5 "5 MiniRae 2000 -400 CC/minute,
�/V\ an MiniRae 3000 -500 CC/minute,
w5 r?s SKC Pump Varies)
LF Gas Meter Readings: Meter Type in Use:
Methane (CH4 in %) �� r7 GEM 5000 +
Methane LEL (in %) 7 7 GEM 5000 +
Carbon Dioxide (CO2 in %) L GEM 5000 +
Oxygen (02 in %) ()� b GEM 5000 +
Hydrogen Sulfide (H2S in PPM) GEM 5000 +
Mercury (Hg in ug/M3) NA NA
VOCs by PID (in PPM) NA NA
Purge Computation:
COMMENTS:
Calibration Notes: Were Meters Calibrated in the Field Prior to Usage? Yes 1 No
Is Calibration Log Current? Yes 1 No
Meter Notes:
Have all Meter Model and Serial Numbers been Recoded in Field Log? See
No
Do Meters Appear to be Functioning Properly at this Time? No
Additional Notes: ez' . ' I- r)AtA
Lt-b Mrone tsianK LO9S_l IZ0ZUZU.XIS

WithersRavenel
Our People. Your Success
PROBE NO GW-2R
TOTAL DEPTH: ` feet (TD)
LOCATION:
WEATHER CONDITIONS:
PURGING:
VAPOR PROBE FIELD MEASUREMENT LOG
PAGE V OF 1
PROJECT: Kernersville Closed Landfill 34-04
PROJECT NO: 6140180.39
DATE: November 25, 2020
SAMPLER: L. Elliott
Air Temperature <'� 'F�
Barometric Pressure (Stable, Rising, or Falling)
Relative Humidity Ambient Air �o
Moisture Description Sampling Zone (Dry, Moist, or Flooded)
Calculated Purge Volume (in CCs) 1 ,2-D(S
Purge Pump/Device & Purge Rate in CCs 300 CC/minute (GEM 2000 -300 CC/minute,
Time Purge Initiated
Purge Volume @ Observed Stabilization (in CCs)
Time Readings Began
I K c? MiniRae 2000 -400 CC/minute,
I ? 60 MiniRae 3000 -500 CC/minute,
116 2Z SKC Pump Varies)
LF Gas Meter Readings:
Methane (CH4 in %) �Od
Methane LEL (in %)
Carbon Dioxide (CO2 in %)
Oxygen (OZ in %) bL��
4
Hydrogen Sulfide (HzS in PPM) Z
Mercury (Hg in ug/M3) NA
VOCs by PID (in PPM) NA
Purge Computation
Meter Type in Use:
GEM 5000 +
GEM 5000 +
GEM 5000 +
GEM 5000 +
GEM 5000 +
NA
NA
COMMENTS:
Calibration Notes: Were Meters Calibrated in the Field Prior to Usage? Ye / No
Is Calibration Log Current? e 1 No
Meter Notes:
Have all Meter Model and Serial Numbers been Recoded in Field Log? No
Do Meters Appear to be Functioning Properly at this Time? es / No
Additional Notes:
LFG Probe Blank Logs_11252a20.xls

NO WithersRavenei
4 ■ Our People. Your Success
PROBE NO GW-4
TOTAL DEPTH: Gl feet (TD)
LOCATION:
WEATHER CONDITIONS:
PURGING:
VAPOR PROBE FIELD MEASUREMENT LOG
PAGE -LOF_ I
PROJECT: Kernersville Closed Landfill 34-04
PROJECT NO: 6140180.39
DATE: November 25, 2020
SAMPLER: L. Elliott
Air Temperature
Barometric Pressure 2 1 "3a (Stable, Rising, or aali:na,
Relative Humidity Ambient Air
Moisture Description Sampling Zone l�S (Dry, Moist, or Flooded)
Calculated Purge Volume (in CCs) 466C6.
Purge Pump/Device & Purge Rate in CCs 300 CC/minute (GEM 2000 -300 CC/minute,
Time Purge Initiated I I %�- MiniRae 2000 -400 CC/minute,
Purge Volume @ Observed Stabilization (in CCs) ' t bb MiniRae 3000 -500 CC/minute,
Time Readings Began ) / a I SKC Pump Varies)
LF Gas Meter Readings:
Methane (CH4 in %) ,
Methane LEL (in %) D
Carbon Dioxide (CO2 in %) (�
Oxygen (02 in %)
Hydrogen Sulfide (H2S in PPM) b
Mercury (Hg in ug/M3) NA
VOCs by PID (in PPM)
Purge Computation:
COMMENTS:
NA
Meter Type in Use
GEM 5000 +
GEM 5000 +
GEM 5000 +
GEM 5000 +
GEM 5000 +
NA
NA
Calibration Notes: Were Meters Calibrated in the Field Prior to Usage? e ! No
Is Calibration Log Current? es No
Meter Notes:
Have all Meter Model and Serial Numbers been Recoded in Field Log? Y / No
Do Meters Appear to be Functioning Properly at this Time? Yes No
Additional Notes:
LFG Probe Blank Logs_11252020.xls

WithersRavenel
Our People. Your Success
PROBE NO
TOTAL DEPTH:
LOCATION:
GW-3
feet (TD)
WEATHER CONDITIONS:
Air Temperature
Barometric Pressure
Relative Humidity Ambient Air
Moisture Description Sampling Zone
PURGING:
Calculated Purge Volume (in CCs)
VAPOR PROBE FIELD MEASUREMENT LOG
PAGE OF
PROJECT: Kernersville Closed Landfill 34-04
PROJECT NO: 6140180.39
DATE: November 25, 2020
SAMPLER: L. Elliott
(Stable, Rising, or Falling)
(Dry, Moist, or Flooded)
Purge Pump/Device & Purge Rate in CCs 300 CC/minute
(GEM 2000 -300 CC/minute,
Time Purge Initiated
MiniRae 2000 -400 CC/minute,
Purge Volume @ Observed Stabilization (in CCs)
MiniRae 3000 --500 CC/minute,
Time Readings Began
SKC Pump Varies)
LF Gas Meter Readings:
Meter Type in Use:
Methane (CH4 in %)
GEM 5000 +
Methane LEL (in %)
GEM 5000 +
Carbon Dioxide (CO2 in %)
GEM 5000 +
Oxygen (02 in %)
GEM 5000 +
Hydrogen Sulfide (H2S in PPM)
GEM 5000 +
Mercury (Hg in ug/M3) NA
NA
VOCs by PID (in PPM) NA
NA
Purge Computation
COMMENTS:
Calibration Notes: Were Meters Calibrated in the Field Prior to Usage? Yes / No
Is Calibration Log Current? Yes / No
Meter Notes:
Have all Meter Model and Serial Numbers been Recoded in Field Log? Yes / No
Do Meters Appear to be Functioning Properly at this Time? Yes / No
Additional Notes:
LFG Probe Blank Logs_11252020.xis

NO WithersRavenel
NOOur People. Your Success
PROBE NO: GW-5R
TOTAL DEPTH: feet (TD)
LOCATION:
WEATHER CONDITIONS:
VAPOR PROBE FIELD MEASUREMENT LOG
PAGE I OF
PROJECT: Kernersville Closed Landfill 34-04
PROJECT NO. 6140180.39
DATE: November 25, 2020
SAMPLER: L. Elliott
Air Temperature v
Barometric Pressure 2qj 4-� (Stable, Rising, or Falling)
Relative Humidity Ambient Air ,I 4>
Moisture Description Sampling Zone NI A411�- (Dry, Moist, or Flooded)
PURGING:
Calculated Purge Volume (in CCs)
Purge Pump/Device & Purge Rate in CCs
Time Purge Initiated
Purge Volume @ Observed Stabilization (in CCs)
Time Readings Began
�6o0—
.qnn CCIn imitA (GEM 2000 -300 CC/minute,
m d
MiniRae 2000 -400 CC/minute,
410
MiniRae 3000 -500 CC/minute,
l I g103
SKC Pump Varies)
LF Gas Meter Readings:
Methane (CH4 in %) , b
Methane LEL (in %) D
Carbon Dioxide (CO2 in %) v
Oxygen (02 in %) 21
Hydrogen Sulfide (H2S in PPM)
Mercury (Hg in ug/M3) NA
VOCs by PID (in PPM) NA
Purge Computation:
COMMENTS:
Meter Type in Use:
GEM 5000 +
GEM 5000 +
GEM 5000 +
GEM 5000 +
GEM 5000 +
NA
NA
Calibration Notes: Were Meters Calibrated in the Field Prior to Usage? / No
Is Calibration Log Current? Ye / No
Meter Notes:
Have all Meter Model and Serial Numbers been Recoded in Field Log?
Do Meters Appear to be Functioning Properly at this Time?
Additional Notes:
/ No
Yes / No
LFG Probe Blank Logs_11252020.xls

WithersRavenel
Our People. Your Success
PROBE NO. GW-6
TOTAL DEPTH: 113, feet (TD)
LOCATION:
WEATHER CONDITIONS:
VAPOR PROBE FIELD MEASUREMENT LOG
PAGE \ OF
PROJECT: Kernersville Closed Landfill 34-04
PROJECT NO: 6140180.39
DATE: November 25, 2020
SAMPLER: L. Elliott
Air Temperature -�4. P,,, °
Barometric Pressure I -I S � (Stable, Rising, or Falling)
Relative Humidity Ambient Air (�
Moisture Description Sampling Zone `, (Dry, Moist, or Flooded)
PURGING:
Calculated Purge Volume (in CCs) 30
Purge Pump/Device & Purge Rate in CCs 300 CC/minute (GEM 2000 --300 CC/minute,
Time Purge Initiated )6LL- MiniRae 2000 -400 CC/minute,
Purge Volume @ Observed Stabilization (in CCs) bb pe, MiniRae 3000 -500 CC/minute,
Time Readings Began o43 SKC Pump Varies)
LF Gas Meter Readings:
Methane (CH4 in %) D. o
Methane LEL (in %) (�
Carbon Dioxide (CO2 in %) L�
Oxygen (02 in %)
Hydrogen Sulfide (H2S in PPM) d
Mercury (Hg in ug/M3) NA
VOCs by PID (in PPM) NA
Purge Computation:
COMMENTS:
Calibration Notes:
Meter Notes:
Meter Type in Use
GEM 5000 +
GEM 5000 +
GEM 5000 +
GEM 5000 +
GEM 5000 +
NA
NA
Were Meters Calibrated in the Field Prior to Usage? Yes / No
Is Calibration Log Current? Yes / No
Have all Meter Model and Serial Numbers been Recoded in Field Log?
Do Meters Appear to be Functioning Properly at this Time?
Additional Notes:
/ No
Yes / No
L,ry riuuta Diann Luys_i 1eJLV4V.➢UD

■■ WithersRavenel
NOOur People. Your Success
PROBE NO GW-7
TOTAL DEPTH: Stv feet (TD)
LOCATION:
VAPOR PROBE FIELD MEASUREMENT LOG
PAGE I OF I
PROJECT: Kernersville Closed Landfill 34-04
PROJECT NO: 6140180.39
DATE: November 25, 2020
SAMPLER: L. Elliott
WEATHER CONDITIONS:
Air Temperature �� D
Barometric Pressure (Stable, Rising, or Falling)
Relative Humidity Ambient Air
Moisture Description Sampling Zone
PURGING:
Calculated Purge Volume (in CCs)
Purge Pump/Device & Purge Rate in CCs
Time Purge Initiated
Purge Volume @ Observed Stabilization (in CCs)
Time Readings Began
(Dry, Moist, or Flooded)
J
0o,
300 CC/minute (GEM 2000 —300 CC/minute,
I I D MiniRae 2000 —400 CC/minute,
MiniRae 3000 —500 CC/minute,
b SKC Pump Varies)
LF Gas Meter Readings:
Meter Type in Use:
Methane (CH4 in %)
b /�
GEM 5000 +
Methane LEL (in %)
GEM 5000 +
Carbon Dioxide (CO2 in %)
/
GEM 5000 +
Oxygen (02 in %)
l ��
GEM 5000 +
Hydrogen Sulfide (H2S in PPM)
0
GEM 5000 +
Mercury (Hg in ug/m3)
NA
NA
VOCs by PID (in PPM)
NA
NA
Purge Computation:
COMMENTS
Calibration Notes: Were Meters Calibrated in the Field Prior to Usage? Ye / No
Is Calibration Log Current? Ye / No
Meter Notes:
Have all Meter Model and Serial Numbers been Recoded in Field Log? / No
Do Meters Appear to be Functioning Properly at this Time? Yes / No
Additional Notes: N)-' I i \w,
LFG Probe Blank Logs_11252020.xis

■o WithersRavenel
% ■ Our People. Your Success
PROBE NO
TOTAL DEPTH
LOCATION
GW-1
11 feet (TD)
VAPOR PROBE FIELD MEASUREMENT LOG
PAGE i OF i
PROJECT: Kernersville Closed Landfill 34-04
PROJECT NO: 6140180.39
DATE: December 30, 2020
SAMPLER: L. Elliott
Air Temperature T x)
n
Barometric Pressure (Stable, (Stable, Rising, or Falling)
Relative Humidity Ambient Air ?J �, L0 14.0
Moisture Description Sampling Zone 14A (Dry, Moist, or Flooded)
PURGING:
Calculated Purge Volume (in CCs)
Purge Pump/Device & Purge Rate in CCs
Time Purge Initiated
Purge Volume @ Observed Stabilization (in CCs)
Time Readings Began
1 2ab
300 CC/minute (GEM 2000 -300 CC/minute,
�O MiniRae 2000 -400 CC/minute,
MiniRae 3000 -500 CC/minute,
" SKC Pump Varies)
LF Gas Meter Readings:
Meter Type in Use:
Methane (CH4 in %)
`1r v,
GEM 5000 +
Methane LEL (in %)
)»
GEM 5000 +
Carbon Dioxide (CO2 in %)
L�
GEM 5000 +
Oxygen (02 in %)
O . b
GEM 5000 +
Hydrogen Sulfide (H2S in PPM)
6
GEM 5000 +
Mercury (Hg in ug/M3)
NA
NA
VOCs by PID (in PPM)
NA
NA
Purge Computation:
COMMENTS:
Calibration Notes: Were Meters Calibrated in the Field Prior to Usage? Yes No
Is Calibration Log Current? Yes / No
Meter Notes:
Have all Meter Model and Serial Numbers been Recoded in Field Log? I No
Do Meters Appear to be Functioning Properly at this Time? Ye No
Additional Notes:
LFU Probe Blank Logs_12302020.xls

k t Withers Rave n e l VAPOR PROBE FIELD MEASUREMENT LOG
NOOur People. Your Success
PAGE OF l
PROBE NO: GW-2R PROJECT: Kernersville Closed Landfill 34-04
TOTAL DEPTH: 0 feet (TD) PROJECT NO: 6140180.39
LOCATION: DATE: December 30, 2020
SAMPLER: L. Elliott
WEATHER CONDITIONS:
Air Temperature
Barometric Pressure 1-� , 41 (Stable, Rising, or Falling)
Relative Humidity Ambient Air ��. �L�b
Moisture Description Sampling Zone R ^`s+ (Dry, Moist, or Flooded)
PURGING:
Calculated Purge Volume (in CCs)
Purge Pump/Device & Purge Rate in CCs
Time Purge Initiated
Purge Volume @ Observed Stabilization (in CCs)
Time Readings Began
� 'Z 0 0
300 CC/minute (GEM 2000 -300 CC/minute,
mot. LX MiniRae 2000 -400 CC/minute,
0 MiniRae 3000 -500 CC/minute,
L '�'-o SKC Pump Varies)
LF Gas Meter Readings: Meter Type in Use:
Methane (CH4 in %) el GEM 5000 +
Methane LEL (in %) >y y GEM 5000 +
Carbon Dioxide (CO2 in %) 3� GEM 5000 +
Oxygen (02 in %) p GEM 5000 +
Hydrogen Sulfide (H2S in PPM) !7 GEM 5000 +
Mercury (Hg in ug/M3) NA NA
VOCs by PID (in PPM) NA NA
Purge Computation:
COMMENTS:
Calibration Notes
Meter Notes:
'o4 �'.
Were Meters Calibrated in the Field Prior to Usage?
Is Calibration Log Current?
Have all Meter Model and Serial Numbers been Recoded in Field Log?
Do Meters Appear to be Functioning Properly at this Time?
Additional Notes:
Yes / No
Ye / No
Ye No
Y / No
LFG Probe Blank Logs_12302020.xls

WithersRavenel
Our People. Your Success
PROBE NO
TOTAL DEPTH:
LOCATION:
GW-3
feet (TD)
WEATHER CONDITIONS:
Air Temperature
Barometric Pressure
Relative Humidity Ambient Air
Moisture Description Sampling Zone
PURGING:
Calculated Purge Volume (in CCs)
VAPOR PROBE FIELD MEASUREMENT LOG
PAGE OF _
PROJECT: �111(11ersville Closed Landfill 34-04
PROJECT NQz' 6140180.39
DATE: December 30, 2020
SAMPLER. L. Elliott
(Stable, Rising, or Falling)
(Dry, Moist, or Flooded)
Purge Pump/Device & Purge Rate in CCs 300 CC/minute
(GEM 2000 -300 CC/minute,
Time Purge Initiated
MiniRae 2000 -400 CC/minute,
Purge Volume @ Observed Stabilization (in CCs)
MiniRae 3000 -500 CC/minute,
Time Readings Began
SKC Pump Varies)
LF Gas Meter Readings:
Meter Type in Use:
Methane (CH4 in %)
GEM 5000 +
Methane LEL (in %)
GEM 5000 +
Carbon Dioxide (CO2 in %)
GEM 5000 +
Oxygen (02 in %)
GEM 5000 +
Hydrogen Sulfide (H,S in PPM)
GEM 5000 +
Mercury (Hg in LOM3) NA
NA
VOCs by PID n PPM) NA
NA
Purge Computation.
COMMENTS:
Calibration Notes: Were Meters Calibrated in the Field Prior to Usage? Yes / No
Is Calibration Log Current? Yes / No
Meter Notes:
Have all Meter Model and Serial Numbers been Recoded in Field Log? Yes / No
Do Meters Appear to be Functioning Properly at this Time? Yes / No
Additional Notes: l Al KI d [ , — A A q (1 n ka 11 W . C/L JA 1;
ury Nrooe wanK L0gs_1Zsulu;eu.x[5

WithersRavenel
Our People. Your Success
PROBE NO GW-4
TOTAL DEPTH: feet (TD)
LOCATION -
WEATHER CONDITIONS:
Air Temperature 'k v
VAPOR PROBE FIELD MEASUREMENT LOG
PAGE L OF
PROJECT: Kernersville Closed Landfill 34-04
PROJECT NO: 6140180.39
DATE: December 30, 2020
SAMPLER: L. Elliott
Barometric Pressure I 4k,!Lle(Stable, Rising, or Falling)
Relative Humidity Ambient Air 2fi .1 d A
Moisture Description Sampling Zone M (Dry, Moist, or Flooded)
PURGING:
Calculated Purge Volume (in CCs)
Purge Pump/Device & Purge Rate in CCs 300 CC/minute
(GEM 2000 -300 CC/minute,
Time Purge Initiated
MiniRae 2000 -400 CC/minute,
Purge Volume @ Observed Stabilization (in CCs) tj
MiniRae 3000 -500 CC/minute,
Time Readings Began 12j
SKC Pump Varies)
LF Gas Meter Readings:
Meter Type in Use:
Methane (CH4 in %) p D
GEM 5000 +
Methane LEL (in %) Q
GEM 5000 +
Carbon Dioxide (CO2 in %) , ''�
GEM 5000 +
Oxygen (02 in %) O
GEM 5000 +
Hydrogen Sulfide (H2S in PPM) b
GEM 5000 +
Mercury (Hg in ug/M3) NA
NA
VOCs by PID (in PPM) NA
NA
Purge Computation:
COMMENTS:
Calibration Notes: Were Meters Calibrated in the Field Prior to Usage?
Ye / No
Is Calibration Log Current?
Yes / No
Meter Notes:
Have all Meter Model and Serial Numbers been Recoded in Field Log?
Yes / No
Do Meters Appear to be Functioning Properly at this Time?
Yes / No
Additional Notes:
LFU Probe Blank Logs_1230202O.As

WithersRavenel
Our People. Your Success
PROBE NO GW-5R
TOTAL DEPTH: feet (TD)
LOCATION.
WEATHER CONDITIONS:
PURGING:
VAPOR PROBE FIELD MEASUREMENT LOG
PAGE i OF \
PROJECT: Kernersville Closed Landfill 34-04
PROJECT NO: 6140180.39
DATE: December 30, 2020
SAMPLER: L. Elliott
Air Temperature 4-1, a - �
Barometric Pressure 2 -� .4 (Stable, Rising- or Falling)
Relative Humidity Ambient Air flD
Moisture Description Sampling Zone 6L4L,1 (Dry, Moist, or Flooded)
Calculated Purge Volume (in CCs) "160
Purge Pump/Device & Purge Rate in CCs 300 CC/minute (GEM 2000 -300 CC/minute,
Time Purge Initiated
Purge Volume @ Observed Stabilization (in CCs)
Time Readings Began
I j-/w MiniRae 2000 -400 CC/minute,
MiniRae 3000 -500 CC/minute,
1 13 SKC Pump Varies)
LF Gas Meter Readings:
Methane (CH4 in %) (� p
Methane LEL (in %) (j
Carbon Dioxide (CO2 in %) 1
Oxygen (02 in %) , , ►j
Hydrogen Sulfide (H2S in PPM)
Mercury (Hg in ug/M3) NA
VOCs by PID (in PPM) NA
Purge Computation:
COMMENTS:
Meter Type in Use
GEM 5000 +
GEM 5000 +
GEM 5000 +
GEM 5000 +
GEM 5000 +
NA
NA
Calibration Notes: Were Meters Calibrated in the Field Prior to Usage? Ye 1 No
Is Calibration Log Current? Yes / No
Meter Notes:
Have all Meter Model and Serial Numbers been Recoded in Field Log? / No
Do Meters Appear to be Functioning Properly at this Time? Ye / No
Additional Notes:
Rlank Loos 12302020.As

■� WithersRavenel
Our People. Your Success
PROBE NO GW-6
TOTAL DEPTH: ti X feet (TD)
LOCATION:
WEATHER CONDITIONS:
VAPOR PROBE FIELD MEASUREMENT LOG
PAGE OF
PROJECT- Kernersville Closed Landfill 34-04
PROJECT NO: 6140180.39
DATE: December 30, 2020
SAMPLER: L. Elliott
Air Temperature ? 2 I a
Barometric Pressure E 41
+ (Stable, Rising, or Falling)
Relative Humidity Ambient Air3 ! .T I/,
Moisture Description Sampling Zone (Dry, Moist, or Flooded)
PURGING:
Calculated Purge Volume (in CCs) AM
Purge Pump/Device & Purge Rate in CCs 100 ((/mimitP (GEM 2000 -300 CC/minute,
Time Purge Initiated _ `I1.3p _ MiniRae 2000 -�400 CC/minute,
Purge Volume @ Observed Stabilization (in CCs) ��� MiniRae 3000 -500 CC/minute,
Time Readings Began ��`� SKC Pump Varies)
LF Gas Meter Readings:
Methane (CH4 in %) 0, D
Methane LEL (in %) o. a
Carbon Dioxide (CO2 in %)
Oxygen (02 in %) Z�r
Hydrogen Sulfide (H2S in PPM)
Mercury (Hg in ug/M3) NA
VOCs by PID (in PPM) NA
Purge Computation:
COMMENTS:
Meter Type in Use
GEM 5000 +
GEM 5000 +
GEM 5000 +
GEM 5000 +
GEM 5000 +
NA
NA
Calibration Notes: Were Meters Calibrated in the Field Prior to Usage? Ye / No
Is Calibration Log Current? Ye I No
Meter Notes:
Have all Meter Model and Serial Numbers been Recoded in Field Log? I No
Do Meters Appear to be Functioning Properly at this Time? Yes 1 No
Additional Notes:
LI-6 Probe Blank Logs_12302020.xls

WithersRavenel
Our People. Your Success
PROBE NO: GW-7
TOTAL DEPTH: 3p feet (TD)
LOCATION:
WEATHER CONDITIONS:
PURGING:
VAPOR PROBE FIELD MEASUREMENT LOG
PAGE k OF I
PROJECT: Kernersville Closed Landfill 34-04
PROJECT NO: 6140180.39
DATE: December 30, 2020
SAMPLER: L. Elliott
Air Temperature 4
Barometric Pressure 2 `i'� (Stable, Rising, or Falling)
Relative Humidity Ambient Air 2,, 'K J)p
Moisture Description Sampling Zone (Dry, Moist, or Flooded)
Calculated Purge Volume (in CCs) 106
Purge Pump/Device & Purge Rate in CCs 300 CC/minute (GEM 2000 -300 CC/minute,
Time Purge Initiated lj--sol MiniRae 2000 -400 CC/minute,
Purge Volume @ Observed Stabilization (in CCs) 1� 00 MiniRae 3000 -500 CC/minute,
Time Readings Began I I ' % SKC Pump Varies)
LF Gas Meter Readings:
Methane (CH4 in %) p
Methane LEL (in %)
Carbon Dioxide (CO2 in %) 2 ,
Oxygen (02 in %) ,
Hydrogen Sulfide (H2S in PPM) b
Mercury (Hg in ug/m3) NA
VOCs by PID (in PPM) NA
Purge Computation:
COMMENTS:
Meter Type in Use
GEM 5000 +
GEM 5000 +
GEM 5000 +
GEM 5000 +
GEM 5000 +
NA
NA
Calibration Notes: Were Meters Calibrated in the Field Prior to Usage? es / No
Is Calibration Log Current? Ye / No
Meter Notes:
Have all Meter Model and Serial Numbers been Recoded in Field Log? Yes 1 No
Do Meters Appear to be Functioning Properly at this Time? es / No
Additional Notes:
LrU rrooe nionrc 4L)y5_ IGJULULUIUJ