HomeMy WebLinkAbout3404_Forsyth_Kernersville_MSWLF_Feb2020LFG_FID1527720_20210203VC1:V u5E owLY: Pane, Rep❑r❑ t Llectronic Data - Email CD (data loaded: Yes / No) Doe/Event #:
DENRf--❑Environmental Monitoring
Division of Waste Management - Solid Waste Reoortina Form
Notice: 1 his farm and any information attached to it are "Public Records" as defined in NC General Statute 132-1. As such, these documents are
available for inspection and examination by any person upon request (NC General Statute 132-6).
Instructions:
Prepare one form for each individually monitored unit
Please type or print legibly.
Attach a notification table with values that attain or exceed NC 2L groundwater standards or NC 2B surface water standards. The notification
must include a preliminary analysis of the cause and significance of each value. (e.g. naturally occurring, off -site source, pre-existing
condition, etc.).
Attach a notification table of any groundwater or surface water values that equal or exceed the reporting limits.
Attach a notification table of any methane gas values that attain or exceed explosive gas levels. This includes any structures on or nearby the
facility (NCAC 13B .1629 (4)(a)(i).
Send the original signed and sealed form, any tables, and Electronic Data Deliverable to: Compliance Unit, NCDENR-DWM, Solid Waste
Section, 1646 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1646.
Solid Waste Monitoring Data Submittal Information
Name of entity submitting data (laboratory, consultant, facility owner):
WithersRavenel, Inc.
Contact for questions about data formatting. Include data preparer's name, telephone number and E-mail address:
Name: Mark Brown, LG, PG, RSM
E-mail: mbrown@withersravenel.com
Phone: 919.608.4582
NC Landfill Rule: Actual sampling dates (e.g..
Facility name- Facility Address: Facility Permit # (,0500 or .1600) October 20-24, 2006)
Freeman Road February 3, 2020;
Town of Kernersville Landfill Kemersville, NC 27284 34-04 .1600 February 27, 2020; and
April 3, 2020
Environmental Status: (Check all that apply)
❑ Initial/Background Monitoring 0 Detection Monitoring ❑ Assessment Monitoring ❑ Corrective Action
1'y a of data submitted: (Check all that apply)
Groundwater monitoring data from monitoring wells 0
Groundwater monitoring data from private water supply wells ❑
Leachate monitoring data
Surface water monitoring data ❑
Methane gas monitoring data
Corrective action data (specify)
Other(specify)
Notification attached?
❑ No. No groundwater or surface water standards were exceeded.
Yes, a notification of values exceeding a groundwater or surface water standard is attached. It includes a list of groundwater and surface water
monitoring points, dates, analytical values, NC 2L groundwater standard, NC 213 surface water standard or NC Solid Waste GWPS and
preliminary analysis of the cause and significance of any concentration.
❑X Yes, a notification of values exceeding an explosive methane gas limit is attached. It includes the methane monitoring points, dates, sample
values and explosive methane gas limits.
Certification
To the best of my knowledge, the information reported and statements made on this data submittal and attachments are true and correct
Furthermore, I have attached complete notification of any sampling values meeting or exceeding groundwater standards or explosive gas
levels, and a preliminary analysis of the cause and significance of concentrations exceeding groundwater standards. I am aware that there
are significant penalties for making any false statement, representation, or certification including the possibility of a fine and imprisonment.
Mark Brown, LG, PG, RSM Project Geologist 919.608.4582
Facility Representative Name (Print) Title (Area Code) Telephone Number
n% February 3, 2021 Affix NC Licensed/ Vg&Mypal Geologist Seal
Signature
424 Gallintre Dairy Road, Suite C, Greensboro, NC 27409
Facility Representative Address
C-082
NC PE Firm License Number (if applicable effective May 1, 2009)
Revised 6/2009
Date
V►1rfQ~•��rti
QUARTERLY METHANE MONITORING REPORT
Town of Kernersville Closed Landfill
Permit Number 34-04
Kernersville, North Carolina
1st Quarter 2020
METHANE MONITORING DATA
1st QUARTER 2020 (JANUARY - MARCH)
Facility Name: Town of Kernersville Closed LF
Sampling Dates: 02/03/20 1 02/27/20 04/03/20
Permit Number: 34-04
Sampled by: L. Elliott/A. Barham
Probe ID
January 2020
February 2020
March 2020
Notes
CH4 (%Vol.)
CH4 (%LEL)
CH4 (%Vol.)
CH4 (%LEL)
CH4 (%Vol.)
CH4 (%LEL)
F-5
0.1
2.0
0.0
0.0
0.3
6.0
GW-1
15.7
314.0
29.9
598.0
32.9
658.0
Over LEL
GW-2R
45.6
912.0
2.3
46.0
58.3
1166.0
Over LEL
GW-4
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
2.0
GW-6
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
GW-3
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
2.0
GW-7 11
0.0
0.0
0.0
1 0.0
0.1
1 .0
GW-8
NS
NS
NS
GP-9
NS
NS
NS
GP-10
NS
NS
NS
GP-11
NS
NS
NS
Notes:
100.0
50.0
0.0
GW = Gas Well -Town of Kernersville LFG monitoring location
GP = Gas Probe - LFG monitoring location shared with Waste Management Piedmont site.
NS = Probe not sampled during this monthly sampling event
1st Quarter 2020
Methane (CH4) Gas LEL Exceedances
LFG Probes GW-1 and GW-2R
January 2020 February 2020
tGW-1 tGW-2R
March 2020
Town of Kernersville Closed Landfill WithersRavenel
Permit No. 34-04 Page 1 of 1 1st Quarter 2020
Q
� o
�a�a goo �-
E�
I At
� C'fN RD
o f
SMOKE HO
{
90o �aI�
LQp
I
G IC SCALE—`
I 50 - 1000
;Wh,rh = 1000 rt.
TOWN OF KERNERSVILLE DRAWN BY: SCALE: FIGURENO:
W i t h e rs Ra ve n e l CLOSED LANDFILL - PERMIT #34-04 MDF 1"=1000 ' 1
VA rp GOODWILL CHURCH ROAD
Engineers I Planners I Surveyors KERNERSVILLE GUILFORD/FORSYTH COUNTY NC APPROVEDBY: DATE: PROJECTNO.
115 MacKenan Drivel Cary, NC 27511l t 919,46933401 li-9:C-08321 www.with—ravenel.cam GENERAL LOCATION MAP 5MB 10/18/2016 06140180.11
Mt\��V�-0�60U�0�60.��-suwsr�e M-ee. SL" Vl%CM\:0161016-Oreap- Dn 14 2o16 - r[K[R. WKg
GP-11
GW-5
LEGEND
FACILITY BOUNDARY
WASTE DISPOSAL BOUNDARY
. LANDFILL GAS WELL - TOWN OF KERNERSVILLE
AL LANDFILL GAS PROBE-WA+1 PIEDMONT
NOTES:
1.) 2014 AERIAL OBTAINED FROM THE LOCAL COUNTY GIS DEPARTMENT.
2.) PARCEL INFORMATION OBTAINED FROM GUILFORD AND FORSYTH COUNTY GIS DEPARTMENTS.
G000n I L L CHURCH RI
GRAPHIC SCALE
a 1 0 2aa 4 0
1 inch = 200 ft.
,. TOWN OF KERNERSVILLE ORAWNEY. SCALE. P1GURENO.:
■■W i t h e rs Ra ve n e l CLOSED LANDFILL - PERMIT #34-04 LANDFILL GAS PROBE MDF 1"=200' 2
Engineers I Planners I Surveyors GOODWILL CHURCH ROAD LOCATION MAP FPPROVEDEY: DATE. PROJEUNO
Nez�szi�r9z9av9syao�r�e��eH:e-0ssz��•xx.x�me�sT�e�ei.... KERNERSVILLE,GUILFORD/FORSYTHCOUNTY, INC SMB 10/18/2016 06140180.11
N',1h1��11itl�IWItlIL11 tl-M %1 fll%fA A111t11}la 8M&a..- 02dW 16 M116 - MCM Wd
■ ■ W i t h e rs Ra ve n e l
VAPOR PROBE
FIELD MEASUREMENT LOG
NOOur People. Your Success
PAGE
OF
PROBE NO GW-1 PROJECT:
Kernersville Closed Landfill 34-04
TOTAL DEPTH: feet (TD) PROJECT NO: 6140180.33
LOCATION: DATE:
February 3, 2020
SAMPLER:
A. Barham
WEATHER CONDITIONS:
Air Temperature (Aq 30-P
Barometric Pressure �� , 1 2— (Stable, Rising, or Falling)
Relative Humidity Ambient Air
Moisture Description Sampling Zone
(Dry, Moist, or Flooded)
PURGING:
Calculated Purge Volume (in CCs) �0
Purge Pump/Device & Purge Rate in CCs 300 CC/minute
(GEM 2000 -300 CC/minute,
Time Purge Initiated
MiniRae 2000 -400 CC/minute,
Purge Volume @ Observed Stabilization (in CCs)
MiniRae 3000 -500 CC/minute,
Time Readings Began O ; S
SKC Pump Varies)
LF Gas Meter Readings:
Meter Type in Use:
Methane (CH4 in %) ���
GEM 2000 +
Methane LEL (in %) ���
GEM 2000 +
Carbon Dioxide (CO2 in %) _L_T
GEM 2000 +
Oxygen (Oz in %) i
GEM 2000 +
Hydrogen Sulfide (HzS in PPM) 0GEM
2000 +
Mercury (Hg in ug/M3) NA
NA
VOCs by PID (in PPM) NA
NA
Purge Computation:
COMMENTS:
Calibration Notes: Were Meters Calibrated in the Field Prior to Usage? / No
Is Calibration Log Current? Yes / No
Meter Notes:
Have all Meter Model and Serial Numbers been Recoded in Field Log? Ye / No
Do Meters Appear to be Functioning Properly at this Time? e / No
Additional Notes.
LFU Probe Blank Logs_020320.xls
%10 WithersRavenel
0 Our People. Your Success
PROBE NO: GW-2R
TOTAL DEPTH: / feet (TD)
LOCATION:
WEATHER CONDITIONS:
VAPOR PROBE FIELD MEASUREMENT LOG
PAGE OF
PROJECT: Kernersville Closed Landfill 34-04
PROJECT NO: 6140180.33
DATE: February 3, 2020
SAMPLER: A. Barham
Air Temperature W. 1
Barometric Pressure 47. . & (Stable, Rising, or Falling)
Relative Humidity Ambient Air 3q .
Moisture Description Sampling Zone (Dry, Moist, or Flooded)
PURGING: xx
Calculated Purge Volume (in CCs) V
Purge Pump/Device & Purge Rate in CCs 300 CC/minute (GEM 2000 -300 CC/minute,
Time Purge Initiated '0 ? 1 MiniRae 2000 -400 CC/minute,
Purge Volume @ Observed Stabilization (in CCs) 6 MiniRae 3000 -500 CC/minute,
Time Readings Began D ; Zy SKC Pump Varies)
LF Gas Meter Readings:
Methane (CH4 in %) 45 . eyo
Methane LEL (in %)
Carbon Dioxide (CO2 in %)
Oxygen (02 in %) (, Z
Hydrogen Sulfide (H2S in PPM)
Mercury (Hg in ug/M3) A
VOCs by PID (in PPM) NA
Purge Computation:
COMMENTS:
Calibration Notes: Were Meters Calibrated in the Field Prior to Usage?
Is Calibration Log Current?
Meter Notes:
Have all Meter Model and Serial Numbers been Recoded in Field Log?
Do Meters Appear to be Functioning Properly at this Time?
Additional Notes:
Meter Type in Use:
GEM 2000 +
GEM 2000 +
GEM 2000 +
GEM 2000 +
GEM 2000 +
NA
NA
Yes / No
es / No
e / No
s No
Li U r�uuc uia��n ".yam_ vaw...�a
■■ WithersRavenel
NoOur People. Your Success
PROBE NO GW-3
TOTAL DEPTH: I 1 feet (TD)
LOCATION:
WEATHER CONDITIONS:
Air Temperature V?,1 O
VAPOR PROBE FIELD MEASUREMENT LOG
PAGE OF
PROJECT: Kernersville Closed Landfill 34-04
PROJECT NO: 6140180.33
DATE: February 3, 2020
SAMPLER: A. Barham
Barometric Pressure 2, (Stable, Rising, or Falling)
Relative Humidity Ambient Air �;9 -1f!_
Moisture Description Sampling Zone �R (Dry, Moist, or Flooded)
PURGING:
Calculated Purge Volume (in CCs)
Purge Pump/Device & Purge Rate in CCs
Time Purge Initiated
Purge Volume @ Observed Stabilization (in CCs)
Time Readings Began
LF Gas Meter Readings:
Methane (CH4 in %)
Methane LEL (in %)
Carbon Dioxide (CO2 in %)
Oxygen (02 in %)
Hydrogen Sulfide (H2S in PPM)
Mercury (Hg in ug/M3)
VOCs by PID (in PPM)
Purge Computation:
o.
300 CC/minute
(GEM 2000 --300 CC/minute,
10 : .4 MiniRae 2000 -400 CC/minute,
qn MiniRae 3000 --500 CC/minute,
' 6 . q s SKC Pump Varies)
NA
NA
Meter Type in Use
GEM 2000 +
GEM 2000 +
GEM 2000 +
GEM 2000 +
GEM 2000 +
NA
NA
COMMENTS:
Calibration Notes: Were Meters Calibrated in the Field Prior to Usage? -Y / No
Is Calibration Log Current? e / No
Meter Notes:
Have all Meter Model and Serial Numbers been Recoded in Field Log? e / No
Do Meters Appear to be Functioning Properly at this Time? es / No
Additional Notes:
LFU Probe Blank L❑gs_020320.xls
ry� WithersRavenel
0 Our People. Your Success
PROBE NO GW-4
TOTAL DEPTH: feet (TD)
LOCATION:
WEATHER CONDITIONS:
PURGING:
VAPOR PROBE FIELD MEASUREMENT LOG
PAGE ._ _ OF
PROJECT: Kernersville Closed Landfill 34-04
PROJECT NO:
6140180.33
DATE:
February 3, 2020
SAMPLER:
A. Barham
Air Temperature 160, 1 o4—
Barometric Pressure q (Stable, Rising, or Falling)
Relative Humidity Ambient Air 5 ��
Moisture Description Sampling Zone ouv(Dry, Moist, or Flooded)
Calculated Purge Volume (in CCs)
Purge Pump/Device & Purge Rate in CCs
Time Purge Initiated
Purge Volume @ Observed Stabilization (in CCs)
Time Readings Began
300 CC/minute (GEM 2000 --300 CC/minute,
MiniRae 2000 -400 CC/minute,
Q OD MiniRae 3000 -500 CC/minute,
: 01 SKC Pump Varies)
LF Gas Meter Readings:
Methane (CH4 in %)
Methane LEL (in %) (�
Carbon Dioxide (CO2 in %)
Oxygen (02 in %) , w
Hydrogen Sulfide (H2S in PPM) Owm
Mercury (Hg in ug/M3) N
VOCs by PID (in PPM)
Purge Computation
-
NA
Meter Type in Use:
GEM 2000 +
GEM 2000 +
GEM 2000 +
GEM 2000 +
GEM 2000 +
NA
NA
COMMENTS:
Calibration Notes: Were Meters Calibrated in the Field Prior to Usage? ge/ No
Is Calibration Log Current? / No
Meter Notes:
Have all Meter Model and Serial Numbers been Recoded in Field Log? / No
Do Meters Appear to be Functioning Properly at this Time? es / No
Additional Notes:
I FC, Pmba R4ank Lnas 020320 As
WithersRavenel
Our People. Your Success
PROBE NO GW-5R
TOTAL DEPTH: feet (TD)
LOCATION:
WEATHER CONDITIONS:
Air Temperature LZ4 . T-r�
VAPOR PROBE FIELD MEASUREMENT LOG
PAGE OF
PROJECT: Kernersville Closed Landfill 34-04
PROJECT NO: 6140180.33
DATE: February 3, 2020
SAMPLER: A. Barham
Barometric Pressure �� , t I (Stable, Rising, or Falling)
Relative Humidity Ambient Air -3 y
Moisture Description Sampling Zone (Dry, Moist, or Flooded)
PURGING:
Calculated Purge Volume (in CCs)
qV V
Purge Pump/Device & Purge Rate in CCs 300 CC/minute (GEM 2000 -300 CC/minute,
Time Purge Initiated 16- 3� MiniRae 2000 -400 CC/minute,
Purge Volume @ Observed Stabilization (in CCs) MiniRae 3000 -500 CC/minute,
Time Readings Began 3� SKC Pump Varies)
LF Gas Meter Readings: D
Methane (CH4 in %)
Methane LEL (in %) �y
Carbon Dioxide (CO2 in %) i 6
Oxygen (02 in %) I ,
Hydrogen Sulfide (H2S in PPM) Qwm
Mercury (Hg in ug/M3) A
VOCs by PID (in PPM)
Purge Computation:
NA
Meter Type in Use:
GEM 2000 +
GEM 2000 +
GEM 2000 +
GEM 2000 +
GEM 2000 +
NA
NA
COMMENTS:
Calibration Notes: Were Meters Calibrated in the Field Prior to Usage? 1 No
Is Calibration Log Current? o
/ No
Meter Notes:
Have all Meter Model and Serial Numbers been Recoded in Field Log? / No
Do Meters Appear to be Functioning Properly at this Time? es / No
Additional Notes:
LFU Probe Blank Logs_020320.xls
WithersRavenel
Our People. Your Success
PROBE NO GW-6
TOTAL DEPTH: 84�� feet (TD)
LOCATION
WEATHER CONDITIONS:
Air Temperature
Barometric Pressure
Relative Humidity Ambient Air
PURGING:
�S S6- V
Moisture Description Sampling Zone
Calculated Purge Volume (in CCs)
Purge Pump/Device & Purge Rate in CCs
Time Purge Initiated
Purge Volume @ Observed Stabilization (in CCs)
Time Readings Began
LF Gas Meter Readings:
Methane (CH4 in %)
Methane LEL (in %)
Carbon Dioxide (CO2 in %
Oxygen (02 in %)
Hydrogen Sulfide (H2S in
Mercury (Hg in ug/M3)
VOCs by PID (in PPM)
Purge Computation:
COMMENTS:
Calibration Notes
r►l
VAPOR PROBE FIELD MEASUREMENT LOG
PAGE .. OF
PROJECT: Kernersville Closed Landfill 34-04
PROJECT NO: 6140180.33
DATE: February 3, 2020
SAMPLER: A. Barham
(Stable, Rising, or Falling)
(Dry, Moist, or Flooded)
96Oc
300 CC/minute (GEM 2000 —300 CC/minute,
�� MiniRae 2000 —400 CC/minute,
MiniRae 3000 —500 CC/minute,
SKC Pump Varies)
NA
Meter Type in Use
GEM 2000 +
GEM 2000 +
GEM 2000 +
GEM 2000 +
GEM 2000 +
NA
NA
Were Meters Calibrated in the Field Prior to Usage? Ces / No
Is Calibration Log Current? Ye / No
Meter Notes:
Have all Meter Model and Serial Numbers been Recoded in Field Log?
Do Meters Appear to be Functioning Properly at this Time?
Additional Notes:
No -
Yes / No
Lrko rrooe Oianrc LUUt; ULVJLU.RI,
- WithersRavenel
Our People. Your Success
PROBE NO: GW-7
TOTAL DEPTH: 96 feet (TD)
LOCATION
WEATHER CONDITIONS:
PURGING:
VAPOR PROBE FIELD MEASUREMENT LOG
PAGE OF
PROJECT: Kernersville Closed Landfill 34-04
PROJECT NO. 6140180.33
DATE: February 3, 2020
SAMPLER: A. Barham
Air Temperature t09, 161�
Barometric Pressure 22 (Stable, Rising, or Falling)
Relative Humidity Ambient Air 4 1 OL
Moisture Description Sampling Zone (Dry, Moist, or Flooded)
Calculated Purge Volume (in CCs)
Purge Pump/Device & Purge Rate in CCs
Time Purge Initiated
Purge Volume @ Observed Stabilization (in CCs)
Time Readings Began
300 CC/minute (GEM 2000 -300 CC/minute,
MiniRae 2000 -400 CC/minute,
9 M MiniRae 3000 -500 CC/minute,
C V ; 55 SKC Pump Varies)
LF Gas Meter Readings:
Methane (CH4 in %) �]1
Methane LEL (in %) n,
Carbon Dioxide (CO2 in %) 0
Oxygen (02 in %) cf -C
Hydrogen Sulfide (HzS in PPM)
Mercury (Hg in ug/m3) A
VOCs by PID (in PPM) NA
Purge Computation:
COMMENTS:
Calibration Notes: Were Meters Calibrated in the Field Prior to Usage?
Is Calibration Log Current?
Meter Notes:
Have all Meter Model and Serial Numbers been Recoded in Field Log?
Do Meters Appear to be Functioning Properly at this Time?
Additional Notes:
Meter Type in Use
GEM 2000 +
GEM 2000 +
GEM 2000 +
GEM 2000 +
GEM 2000 +
NA
NA
Ye / No
es/No
/ No
e / No
U-6 Probe BIanK Logs_020320-xis
-`-- WithersRavenel
,._._ Our People. Your Success
PROBE NO GW-1
TOTAL DEPTH: _SZ feet (TD)
LOCATION
WEATHER CONDITIONS:
VAPOR PROBE FIELD MEASUREMENT LOG
PAGE I OF
PROJECT: Kernersville Closed Landfill 34-04
PROJECT NO: 6140180.33
DATE: February 27, 2020
SAMPLER: L. Elliott
Air Temperature �;_b , '3
Barometric Pressure 1Z (S QL Ie, Rising, or Falling)
Relative Humidity Ambient Air 3Z `t
Moisture Description Sampling Zone �,; * (Dry, Moist, or Flooded)
PURGING:
Calculated Purge Volume (in CCs)
Purge Pump/Device & Purge Rate in CCs
Time Purge Initiated
Purge Volume @ Observed Stabilization (in CCs)
Time Readings Began
I ?o O
300 CC/minute (GEM 2000 -300 CC/minute,
1 b4 1 MiniRae 2000 -400 CC/minute,
1 7_LO MiniRae 3000 —500 CC/minute,
1053 SKC Pump Varies)
LF Gas Meter Readings:
Meter Type in Use:
Methane (CH4 in %)
��,
GEM 2000 +
Methane LEL (in %)
>»
GEM 2000 +
Carbon Dioxide (CO2 in %)
2I +
GEM 2000 +
Oxygen (02 in %)
U
GEM 2000 +
Hydrogen Sulfide (H2S in PPM)
GEM 2000 +
Mercury (Hg in ug/M3)
NA
NA
VOCs by PID (in PPM)
NA
NA
Purge Computation:
COMMENTS:
Calibration Notes: Were Meters Calibrated in the Field Prior to Usage? Yes > No
Is Calibration Log Current? 'e J No
Meter Notes:
Have all Meter Model and Serial Numbers been Recoded in Field Log? Yes No
Do Meters Appear to be Functioning Properly at this Time? Yes / No
Additional Notes:
LFG Probe Blank Logs_022720.xls
%0 WithersRavenel
NoOur People. Your Success
PROBE NO: GW-2R
TOTAL DEPTH: U feet (TD)
LOCATION
WEATHER CONDITIONS:
VAPOR PROBE FIELD MEASUREMENT LOG
PAGE I OF I
PROJECT:
PROJECT NO:
DATE:
SAMPLER:
Kernersville Closed Landfill 34-04
6140180.33
February 27, 2020
L. Elliott
Air Temperature
Barometric Pressure Zal 1VA (stable, Rising, or Falling)
Relative Humidity Ambient Air 2%. S
Moisture Description Sampling Zone —Meg v- (Dry, Mcist, or Flooded)
PURGING:
Calculated Purge Volume (in CCs)
Purge Pump/Device & Purge Rate in CCs
Time Purge Initiated
Purge Volume @ Observed Stabilization (in CCs)
Time Readings Began
Mm
300 CC/minute
ivS0
lot Ob
l i va
LF Gas Meter Readings:
Methane (CH4 in %) 2 ,3
Methane LEL (in %) L,I 61 b
Carbon Dioxide (CO2 in %) !�i .a
Oxygen (02 in %) :ZO D
Hydrogen Sulfide (H2S in PPM) n
Mercury (Hg in ug/M3) NA
VOCs by PID (in PPM) NA
Purge Computation:
COMMENTS:
(GEM 2000 —300 CC/minute,
MiniRae 2000 —400 CC/minute,
MiniRae 3000 --500 CC/minute,
SKC Pump Varies)
Meter Type in Use:
GEM 2000 +
GEM 2000 +
GEM 2000 +
GEM 2000 +
GEM 2000 +
NA
NA
Calibration Notes: Were Meters Calibrated in the Field Prior to Usage? Yes No
Is Calibration Log Current? No
Meter Notes:
Have all Meter Model and Serial Numbers been Recoded in Field Log? Yes 1 No
Do Meters Appear to be Functioning Properly at this Time? Yes No
Additional Notes:
LFG Probe Blank Logs_022720.xis
WithersRavenel
Our People. Your Success
PROBE NO: GW-3
TOTAL DEPTH: feet (TD)
LOCATION:
WEATHER CONDITIONS:
PURGING:
VAPOR PROBE FIELD MEASUREMENT LOG
PAGE _L OF i
PROJECT: Kernersville Closed Landfill 34-04
PROJECT NO: 6140180.33
DATE:
SAMPLER:
February 27, 2020
L. Elliott
Air Temperature L -z
Barometric Pressure (Stable, Rising, or Falling)
Relative Humidity Ambient Air ��,'� ► Q
Moisture Description Sampling Zone ��I�� (Dry, Moist, or Flooded)
Calculated Purge Volume (in CCs)
Purge Pump/Device & Purge Rate in CCs
Time Purge Initiated
Purge Volume @ Observed Stabilization (in CCs)
Time Readings Began
C�Va
300 CC/minute (GEM 2000 --300 CC/minute,
" Ljqe,MiniRae 2000 -400 CC/minute,
A MiniRae 3000 --500 CC/minute,
I I q �< SKC Pump Varies)
LF Gas Meter Readings: Meter Type in Use:
Methane (CH4 in %) D. GEM 2000 +
Methane LEL (in %) G GEM 2000 +
Carbon Dioxide (CO2 in %) ( GEM 2000 +
Oxygen (02 in %) 41 .� GEM 2000 +
Hydrogen Sulfide (H2S in PPM) GEM 2000 +
Mercury (Hg in ug/M3) NA NA
VOCs by PID (in PPM) NA NA
Purge Computation:
COMMENTS:
Calibration Notes: Were Meters Calibrated in the Field Prior to Usage? Yes / No
Is Calibration Log Current? Yes No
Meter Notes:
Have all Meter Model and Serial Numbers been Recoded in Field Log? Yes No
Do Meters Appear to be Functioning Properly at this Time? Yes 1 No
Additional Notes:
Probe Blank Logs 022720.xis
■■ WithersRavenel
NoOur People. Your Success
PROBE NO GW-4
TOTAL DEPTH: feet (TD)
LOCATION:
VAPOR PROBE FIELD MEASUREMENT LOG
PAGE 1 OF J_
PROJECT: Kernersville Closed Landfill 34-04
PROJECT NO: 6140180.33
DATE: February 27, 2020
SAMPLER: L. Elliott
WEATHER CONDITIONS:
Air Temperature
Barometric Pressure (Stable, Rising, or Falling)
Relative Humidity Ambient Air 2'.3 0)d
Moisture Description Sampling Zone
PURGING:
Calculated Purge Volume (in CCs)
Purge Pump/Device & Purge Rate in CCs
Time Purge Initiated
Purge Volume @ Observed Stabilization (in CCs)
Time Readings Began
(Dry, Moist, or Flooded)
�db
300 CC/minute (GEM 2000 —300 CC/minute,
,\ —:k4z' MiniRae 2000 —400 CC/minute,
4dr✓ MiniRae 3000 —500 CC/minute,
SKC Pump Varies)
LF Gas Meter Readings: Meter Type in Use:
Methane (CH4 in %) t%. b GEM 2000 +
Methane LEL (in %) " !� GEM 2000 +
Carbon Dioxide (CO2 in %) ( GEM 2000 +
Oxygen (02 in %) p GEM 2000 +
Hydrogen Sulfide (H2S in PPM) f7 GEM 2000 +
Mercury (Hg in ug/M3) NA NA
VOCs by PID (in PPM) NA NA
Purge Computation.
COMMENTS:
Calibration Notes: Were Meters Calibrated in the Field Prior to Usage? es / No
Is Calibration Log Current? �! No
Meter Notes:
Have all Meter Model and Serial Numbers been Recoded in Field Log?/ No
Do Meters Appear to be Functioning Properly at this Time? Y�e / No
Additional Notes:
LFG Probe Blank Logs_022720.xls
%0 WithersRavenel
ftoOur People. Your Success
PROBE NO
TOTAL DEPTH:
LOCATION:
GW-5R
WEATHER CONDITIONS:
PURGING:
Air Temperature
Barometric Pressure
feet (TD)
6A,'�
VAPOR PROBE FIELD MEASUREMENT LOG
PAGE � OF
PROJECT: Kernersville Closed Landfill 34-04
PROJECT NO: 6140180.33
DATE: February 27, 2020
SAMPLER: L. Elliott
241 . 1 -1 (Stabie, Rising, or Falling)
Relative Humidity Ambient Air
Moisture Description Sampling Zone I' (Dry, Moist, or Flooded)
Calculated Purge Volume (in CCs)
tl� bQ
Purge Pump/Device & Purge Rate in CCs
300 CC/minute
(GEM 2000 -300 CC/minute,
Time Purge Initiated
h q
MiniRae 2000 -400 CC/minute,
Purge Volume @ Observed Stabilization (in CCs) / d
MiniRae 3000 -500 CC/minute,
Time Readings Began
2
SKC Pump Varies)
LF Gas Meter Readings:
Meter Type in Use:
Methane (CH4 in %)
0.0
GEM 2000 +
Methane LEL (in %)
�*
GEM 2000 +
Carbon Dioxide (CO2 in %)
(�,'7j
GEM 2000 +
Oxygen (02 in %)
2 .3
GEM 2000 +
Hydrogen Sulfide (H2S in PPM)
0
GEM 2000 +
Mercury (Hg in ug/M3)
NA
NA
VOCs by PID (in PPM)
NA
NA
Purge Computation:
COMMENTS:
Calibration Notes: Were Meters Calibrated in the Field Prior to Usage? es No
Is Calibration Log Current? Ye 1 No
Meter Notes:
Have all Meter Model and Serial Numbers been Recoded in Field Log? t
No
Do Meters Appear to be Functioning Properly at this Time? No
Additional Notes:
LFC3 Probe Blank Logs_022720.xls
r.{ WithersRavenel
Our People. Your Success
PROBE NO
TOTAL DEPTH:
LOCATION:
GW-6
WEATHER CONDITIONS:
VAPOR PROBE FIELD MEASUREMENT LOG
PAGE 1 OF I
PROJECT: Kernersville Closed Landfill 34-04
feet (TD) PROJECT NO: 6140180.33
DATE: February 27, 2020
SAMPLER: L. Elliott
Air Temperature 41. LF
Barometric Pressure 29 3 (Stable, Rising, or Falling)
Relative Humidity Ambient Air 2 LA 1
Moisture Description Sampling Zone Moia± (Dry, Moist, or Flooded)
PURGING:
Calculated Purge Volume (in CCs)
Purge Pump/Device & Purge Rate in CCs
Time Purge Initiated
Purge Volume @ Observed Stabilization (in CCs)
Time Readings Began
im
300 CC/minute (GEM 2000 -300 CC/minute,
1043 MiniRae 2000 -400 CC/minute,
Al 60 MiniRae 3000 -500 CC/minute,
I Q�WD SKC Pump Varies)
LF Gas Meter Readings:
Methane (CH4 in %) d- V
Methane LEL (in %)
Carbon Dioxide (CO2 in %) A�
Oxygen (02 in %)
Hydrogen Sulfide (H2S in PPM) D
Mercury (Hg in ug/M3) NA
VOCs by PID (in PPM) NA
Purge Computation:
Meter Type in Use:
GEM 2000 +
GEM 2000 +
GEM 2000 +
GEM 2000 +
GEM 2000 +
NA
NA
COMMENTS:
Calibration Notes: Were Meters Calibrated in the Field Prior to Usage? Yes No
Is Calibration Log Current? G�) No
Meter Notes:
Have all Meter Model and Serial Numbers been Recoded in Field Log? t
No
Do Meters Appear to be Functioning Properly at this Time? No
Additional Notes: 1 010 PA 4kA k A &44 IIJA Dtn a
LFG Probe Blank Logs_622720.xls
■■ WithersRavenel
■ ip Our People. Your Success
PROBE NO. GW-7
TOTAL DEPTH: 30 feet (TD)
LOCATION:
WEATHER CONDITIONS:
Air Temperature I
Barometric Pressure 2 ,
Relative Humidity Ambient Air
Moisture Description Sampling Zone
PURGING:
Calculated Purge Volume (in CCs)
Purge Pump/Device & Purge Rate in CCs
Time Purge Initiated
Purge Volume @ Observed Stabilization (in CCs)
Time Readings Began
VAPOR PROBE FIELD MEASUREMENT LOG
PAGE I OF
PROJECT: Kernersville Closed Landfill 34-04
PROJECT NO: 6140180.33
DATE: February 27, 2020
SAMPLER: L. Elliott
(Stable, Rising, or Falling)
(Dry, Moist, or Flooded)
�) by
300 CC/minute (GEM 2000 --300 CC/minute,
11 6- ( MiniRae 2000 -400 CC/minute,
141100 MiniRae 3000 -500 CC/minute,
5 SKC Pump Varies)
LF Gas Meter Readings: Meter Type in Use:
Methane (CH4 in %) b, GEM 2000 +
Methane LEL (in %) GEM 2000 +
Carbon Dioxide (CO2 in %)y GEM 2000 +
a
Oxygen (02 in %) 2 '� GEM 2000 +
Hydrogen Sulfide (H2S in PPM) GEM 2000 +
Mercury (Hg in ug/m3) NA NA
VOCs by PID (in PPM) NA NA
Purge Computation:
COMMENTS:
Calibration Notes: Were Meters Calibrated in the Field Prior to Usage? C_Y_ No
Is Calibration Log Current? es / No
Meter Notes:
Have all Meter Model and Serial Numbers been Recoded in Field Log? es No
Do Meters Appear to be Functioning Properly at this Time? Y s No
Additional Notes:
LFG Probe BlanK Logs_02212U.xls
■� WithersRavenel
■ Our People. Your Success
PROBE NO GW-1
TOTAL DEPTH: feet (TD)
LOCATION
WEATHER CONDITIONS:
PURGING:
VAPOR PROBE FIELD MEASUREMENT LOG
PAGE k OF
PROJECT: Kernersville Closed Landfill 34-04
PROJECT NO. 6140180.33
DATE: April, 2020
SAMPLER: L. Elliott
Air Temperature
Barometric Pressure Stabl Rising, or Falling)
Relative Humidity Ambient Air 'Z 6) a
Moisture Description Sampling Zone (Dry, Moist, or Flooded)
Calculated Purge Volume (in CCs) ! ?-4)p
Purge Pump/Device & Purge Rate in CCs 300 CC/minute (GEM 2000 -300 CC/minute,
Time Purge Initiated -1)3 - MiniRae 2000 -400 CC/minute,
Purge Volume @ Observed Stabilization (in CCs) 126 0 MiniRae 3000 --500 CC/minute,
Time Readings Began !, '::�w SKC Pump Varies)
LF Gas Meter Readings:
Methane (CH4 in %)
Methane LEL (in %) 7
Carbon Dioxide (CO2 in %)) Zdjo
Oxygen (02 in %) 2 t� o
Hydrogen Sulfide (H2S in PPM) p
Mercury (Hg in ug/M3) NA
VOCs by PID (in PPM) NA
Purge Computation
-
Meter Type in Use:
GEM 2000 +
GEM 2000 +
GEM 2000 +
GEM 2000 +
GEM 2000 +
NA
NA
COMMENTS:
Calibration Notes: Were Meters Calibrated in the Field Prior to Usage? s No
Is Calibration Log Current? es No
Meter Notes:
Have all Meter Model and Serial Numbers been Recoded in Field Log? No
Do Meters Appear to be Functioning Properly at this Time? Ye No
Additional Notes: C
LFG Probe Blank Logs_033120.xls
■■ WithersRavenel
■. Our People. Your Success
PROBE NO
TOTAL DEPTH
LOCATION:
GW-2R
Z p feet (TD)
WEATHER CONDITIONS:
VAPOR PROBE FIELD MEASUREMENT LOG
PAGE k OF
PROJECT: Kernersville Closed Landfill 34-04
PROJECT NO: 6140180.33
DATE: Apri-�) 2020
SAMPLER: L. Elliott
Air Temperature Co 4 �Lu
Barometric Pressure �C. (StablJ Rising, or Falling)
Relative Humidity Ambient Air
Moisture Description Sampling Zone _ (Dry, Moist, or Flooded)
PURGING:
Calculated Purge Volume (in CCs)
Purge Pump/Device & Purge Rate in CCs
Time Purge Initiated
Purge Volume @ Observed Stabilization (in CCs)
Time Readings Began
,*1JO
inn rrlminl ItP (GEM 2000 —300 CC/minute,
MiniRae 2000 --400 CC/minute,
J"D MiniRae 3000 —500 CC/minute,
SKC Pump Varies)
LF Gas Meter Readings: Meter Type in Use:
Methane (CH4 in %) 5�,3 �p GEM 2000 +
Methane LEL (in %) GEM 2000 +
Carbon Dioxide (CO2 in %) �� ,j D GEM 2000 +
Oxygen (02 in %) u GEM 2000 +
Hydrogen Sulfide (H2S in PPM) 13 GEM 2000 +
Mercury (Hg in ug/M3) NA NA
VOCs by PID (in PPM) NA NA
Purge Computation:
COMMENTS:
Calibration Notes Were Meters Calibrated in the Field Prior to Usage? Yes I No
Is Calibration Log Current? Q1 No
Meter Notes:
Have all Meter Model and Serial Numbers been Recoded in Field Log? Yes No
Do Meters Appear to be Functioning Properly at this Time? Yes No
Additional Notes: c,3, L4
LFG Probe Blank Logs_033120.xls
TAO WithersRavenel
. 10 Our People. Your Success
PROBE NO GW-3
TOTAL DEPTH: feet (TD)
LOCATION
WEATHER CONDITIONS:
VAPOR PROBE FIELD MEASUREMENT LOG
PAGE i OF f
PROJECT: Kernersville Closed Landfill 34-04
PROJECT NO:
6140180.33
DATE: April, 2020
SAMPLER: L. Elliott
Air Temperature U 1 a
Barometric Pressure Stabi Rising, or Falling)
Relative Humidity Ambient Air
Moisture Description Sampling Zone (DryMoist r Flooded)
PURGING:
Calculated Purge Volume (in CCs)
Purge Pump/Device & Purge Rate in CCs
Time Purge Initiated
Purge Volume @ Observed Stabilization (in CCs)
Time Readings Began
1 t� b
300 CC/minute (GEM 2000 —300 CC/minute,
�l. I ! MiniRae 2000 —400 CC/minute,
A9, MiniRae 3000 —500 CC/minute,
SKC Pump Varies)
LF Gas Meter Readings: Meter Type in Use.
Methane (CH4 in %) GEM 2000 +
Methane LEL (in %) Z.�o GEM 2000 +
Carbon Dioxide (CO2 in %) GEM 2000 +
Oxygen (02 in %) 1 GEM 2000 +
Hydrogen Sulfide (H2S in PPM) U GEM 2000 +
Mercury (Hg in ug/M3) NA NA
VOCs by PID (in PPM) NA NA
Purge Computation.
COMMENTS:
Calibration Notes: Were Meters Calibrated in the Field Prior to Usage? Ye / No
Is Calibration Log Current? / No
Meter Notes:
Have all Meter Model and Serial Numbers been Recoded in Field Log?/ No
Do Meters Appear to be Functioning Properly at this Time? 1 No
Additional Notes.
U-6 Nrobe blanK Logs_U331ZU.x1s
*io WithersRavenel
0ioOur People. Your Success
PROBE NO GW-4
TOTAL DEPTH: feet (TD)
LOCATION:
WEATHER CONDITIONS:
Air Temperature Lpo , to
Barometric Pressure Za
Relative Humidity Ambient Air
Moisture Description Sampling Zone
VAPOR PROBE FIELD MEASUREMENT LOG
PAGE I OF I
PROJECT: Kernersville Closed Landfill 34-04
PROJECT NO: 6140180.33
DATE: Apri13 2020
SAMPLER: L. Elliott
U 5t b , Rising, or Falling)
zLe ,) 11)0 _
M J�ISA ^ (DrYQoist>r Flooded)
PURGING:
Calculated Purge Volume (in CCs) O
Purge Pump/Device & Purge Rate in CCs 300 CC/minute (GEM 2000 -300 CC/minute,
Time Purge Initiated 10 ()L - MiniRae 2000 -400 CC/minute,
Purge Volume @ Observed Stabilization (in CCs) '91a Q MiniRae 3000 -500 CC/minute,
Time Readings Began t DOI SKC Pump Varies)
LF Gas Meter Readings:
Methane (CH4 in %) o.1
Methane LEL (in %) 343)-b
Carbon Dioxide (CO2 in %) 0,(
Oxygen (02 in %) ZO 4
Hydrogen Sulfide (H2S in PPM) D
Mercury (Hg in ug/M3) NA
VOCs by PID (in PPM) NA
Purge Computation:
COMMENTS:
Meter Type in Use:
GEM 2000 +
GEM 2000 +
GEM 2000 +
GEM 2000 +
GEM 2000 +
NA
NA
Calibration Notes: Were Meters Calibrated in the Field Prior to Usage? Yes No
Is Calibration Log Current? (Ye / No
Meter Notes:
Have all Meter Model and Serial Numbers been Recoded in Field Log? d
No
Do Meters Appear to be Functioning Properly at this Time? No
Additional Notes:
LFG Probe Blank Logs_033120.xis
No WithersRavenel
0 Our People. Your Success
PROBE NO: GW-5R
TOTAL DEPTH: tA feet (TD)
LOCATION:
WEATHER CONDITIONS:
VAPOR PROBE FIELD MEASUREMENT LOG
PAGE I OF 1
PROJECT: Kernersville Closed Landfill 34-04
PROJECT NO: 6140180.33
DATE: AprB 2020
SAMPLER: L. Elliott
Air Temperature � 2' "!a
Barometric Pressure Stabl . Rising, or Falling)
Relative Humidity Ambient Air 32,J L)a
Moisture Description Sampling Zone �L-A51 (Dryois or Flooded)
PURGING:
Calculated Purge Volume (in CCs)
Purge Pump/Device & Purge Rate in CCs
Time Purge Initiated
Purge Volume @ Observed Stabilization (in CCs)
Time Readings Began
rS 0
300 CC/minute (GEM 2000 —300 CC/minute,
MiniRae 2000 —400 CC/minute,
9J� MiniRae 3000 —500 CC/minute,
9 Sj SKC Pump Varies)
LF Gas Meter Readings:
Meter Type in Use:
Methane (CH4 in %)
GEM 2000 +
Methane LEL (in %)
"0
GEM 2000 +
Carbon Dioxide (CO2 in %)
0. 1
GEM 2000 +
Oxygen (02 in %)
Zo , 3
GEM 2000 +
Hydrogen Sulfide (H2S in PPM)
p
GEM 2000 +
Mercury (Hg in ug/M3)
NA
NA
VOCs by PID (in PPM)
NA
NA
Purge Computation:
COMMENTS:
Calibration Notes: Were Meters Calibrated in the Field Prior to Usage? Yes No
Is Calibration Log Current? Ye / No
Meter Notes:
Have all Meter Model and Serial Numbers been Recoded in Field Log?
Do Meters Appear to be Functioning Properly at this Time?
e No
es No
Additional Notes:
Lr-6 F robe wanK Log5_L13311U.%ES
■ ■ W i t h e rs Ra ve n e l VAPOR PROBE FIELD MEASUREMENT LOG
rOur People. Your Success
PAGE , OF
PROBE NO GW-6 PROJECT: Kernersville Closed Landfill 34-04
TOTAL DEPTH: feet (TD) PROJECT NO: 6140180.33
LOCATION: DATE: Aprij3, 2020
SAMPLER: L. Elliott
WEATHER CONDITIONS:
Air Temperature S9 Aso
Barometric Pressure 2ql ,� (Stable, Rising, or Falling)
Relative Humidity Ambient Air 3!� LP IN
Moisture Description Sampling Zone (Dry, Moist, or Flooded)
PURGING:
Calculated Purge Volume (in CCs) 1ot3
Purge Pump/Device & Purge Rate in CCs 300 CC/minute (GEM 2000 -300 CC/minute,
Time Purge Initiated
Purge Volume @ Observed Stabilization (in CCs)
Time Readings Began
LF Gas Meter Readings:
Methane (CH4 in %) O
Methane LEL (in %) dl�
Carbon Dioxide (CO2 in %) 3 - alga
Oxygen (OZ in %)
Hydrogen Sulfide (HZS in PPM) O
Mercury (Hg in ug/M3) NA
VOCs by PID (in PPM)
Purge Computation:
NA
12
MiniRae 2000 -400 CC/minute,
()o MiniRae 3000 -500 CC/minute,
t 6' SKC Pump Varies)
Meter Type in Use:
GEM 2000 +
GEM 2000 +
GEM 2000 +
GEM 2000 +
GEM 2000 +
NA
NA
COMMENTS:
Calibration Notes Were Meters Calibrated in the Field Prior to Usage? Ye / No
Is Calibration Log Current? Yes No
Meter Notes:
Have all Meter Model and Serial Numbers been Recoded in Field Log? t
No
Do Meters Appear to be Functioning Properly at this Time? No
Additional Notes:
LFG Probe Blank Logs_033120.xls
40 WithersRavenel
10■ Our People. Your Success
VAPOR PROBE FIELD MEASUREMENT LOG
PAGE J_OFJ_
PROBE NO: GW-7 PROJECT: Kernersville Closed Landfill 34-04
TOTAL DEPTH: feet (TD)
LOCATION:
WEATHER CONDITIONS:
PURGING:
PROJECT NO: 6140180.33
DATE:
SAMPLER:
2020
L. Elliott
Air Temperature ! l �D
Barometric Pressure lj (Stable ising, or Falling)
Relative Humidity Ambient Air 2 a
Moisture Description Sampling Zone Dryoist, or Flooded)
Calculated Purge Volume (in CCs) b
Purge Pump/Device & Purge Rate in CCs 300 CC/minute (GEM 2000 -300 CC/minute,
Time Purge Initiated
Purge Volume @ Observed Stabilization (in CCs)
Time Readings Began
07-4- MiniRae 2000 -400 CC/minute,
1y D0 MiniRae 3000 -500 CC/minute,
` D21 SKC Pump Varies)
LF Gas Meter Readings:
Meter Type in Use:
Methane (CH4 in %)
D
GEM 2000 +
Methane LEL (in %)
6 o
GEM 2000 +
Carbon Dioxide (CO2 in %)
b
GEM 2000 +
Oxygen (02 in %) �, t3
GEM 2000 +
Hydrogen Sulfide (H2S in PPM)
GEM 2000 +
Mercury (Hg in ug/m3)
NA
NA
VOCs by PID (in PPM)
NA
NA
Purge Computation:
COMMENTS:
Calibration Notes: Were Meters Calibrated in the Field Prior to Usage? Ye / No
Is Calibration Log Current? Ye / No
Meter Notes:
Have all Meter Model and Serial Numbers been Recoded in Field Log? �V/
No
Do Meters Appear to be Functioning Properly at this Time? No
Additional Notes:
I FC, Prnha Rlank ! nnc n3'i72n Al ,