Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout5002_CLOSURE_PLANCLOSURE AND POST -CLOSURE PLAN Jackson County Construction / Demolition Landfill The final cap system for the Jackson County Construction / Demolition Landfill will be constructed in two stages. As the fill in each stage is completed, the area will be closed and capped in order to minimize infiltration of stormwater and to reduce leachate production. 1.0 CAP DESCRIPTION AND CONSTRUCTION A cross-section of the final cap is contained on sheet 6 of the drawings. The cross-section will consist of a one foot layer of compacted on -site soils, a compacted 18-inch clay cap with a permeability of 1x10-5 cm/sec, and a 6-inch thick topsoil cover. 1.1 Cap Foundation (intermediate cover) The cap foundation cover (intermediate cover) is designed to minimize infiltration of stormwater into the landfill prior to placement of the barrier cap, and to provide a sound working platform over the municipal solid waste. The compacted intermediate cover will extend over the entire waste area and consist of a minimum of 12-inches of compacted soil. 1.2 Clay Cap The function of the clay cap to minimize surface water infiltration into the underlying waste cell. The clay cap consist of an 18-inch thick compacted clay layer. The clay cap will require a minimum 18 inches of clay soil with a maximum permeability of 1x10-5 cm/sec. The clay soil may consist of on -site, off -site soils, or a combination of the two. The soil may require the addition of bentonite to meet the permeability requirements. The design of the landfill cap provides for a minimum number of penetrations through the low permeable barrier cap. The only required penetrations are for methane gas venting system. 1.2a - Construction Requirements Construction methods for the compacted clay cap shall be based upon the type and quality of the borrow source and shall be verified in the field by constructing test pad(s). The CQA engineer shall ensure that the compacted clay cap installation conforms with the Division approved plans including the following minimum requirements: 1. A test pad shall be constructed prior to beginning installation of the compacted clay cap and whenever there is a significant change in soil material properties. The area and equipment, cap thickness, and subgrade slope and conditions shall be representative of full scale construction. Acceptance and rejection criteria shall be based on results from the tests specified in Section 1.2b. For each lift, a minimum of three test locations shall be established for testing moisture content, density, and a composite sample for recompacted lab permeability. At least one shelby tube sample for lab permeability testing, or another in situ test approved by the Division, shall be obtained per lift. Page 1 2. Soil conditioning, placement, and compaction shall be maintained within the range identified in the moisture -density -permeability relation developed in accordance with Section 1.2b. 3. The final compacted thickness of each lift shall be a maximum of six inches. 4. Prior to placement of successive lifts, the surface of the lift in place shall be scarified or otherwise conditioned to eliminate lift interfaces. 5. The final lift shall be adequately protected from environmental degradation. 1.2b - Construction Quality Assurance Requirements The project engineer shall include in the CQA report a discussion of all quality assurance and quality control testing required in this section. The results of all testing shall be included in the CQA report including documentation of any failed test results, descriptions of the procedures used to correct the improperly installed materials, and statements of all re -testing performed in accordance with the Division approved plans including the following requirements: i. At a minimum, the quality control testing for accepting materials prior to and during construction of a compacted clay cap shall include: particle size distribution analysis, Atterberg limits, triaxial cell laboratory permeability, moisture content, percent bentonite mixed admixed with soil, and the moisture -density -permeability relation. The project engineer shall certify that the materials used in construction were tested according to the Division approved plans. ii. At a minimum, the quality assurance testing for evaluation of each lift of the compacted clay cap shall include: moisture content and density, and permeability testing. Fore each location, the moisture content and density shall be compared to the appropriate moisture - density -permeability relation. The project engineer shall certify that the cap was constructed using the methods and acceptance criteria consistent with test pad construction and tested according to the Division approved plans. iii. Any tests resulting in the penetration of the compacted clay cap shall be repaired using bentonite or as approved the Division. 1.3 Methane Gas Removal System A methane gas venting system has been included with a final cap configuration as shown on sheet 4 of the Drawings. An passive methane gas venting system is proposed to remove methane gas that collects beneath the final cap. The gas collection system consists of 16 gas vents, as detailed on sheet 6. The methane gas vents are to be constructed prior to completion of the final cap. 1.4 Topsoil Cover The topsoil cover will be a total of 6-inches thick. The soil cover will provide support for a vegetative cover and protect the low -permeability barrier. Page 2 1.4a - Materials Required A grass cover is proposed for the Landfill to provide the required cover while minimizing cap maintenance. The surface will be prepared by fertilizing and placing seed in accordance with the North Carolina Erosion and Sediment Control Standards. The materials used for the topsoil cover shall meet the following criteria: i. Topsoil Natural, friable, loamy soil, typical of local topsoil which produces heavy vegetative growth; free from subsoil, weeds, sods, stiff clay, stones larger than 1 inch, toxic substances, litter, or other foreign material harmful to plant growth; having a pH between 6.0 and 7.0. GRADING ANALYSIS ii. Fertilizer: The quality of fertilizer and all operations in connection with the furnishing of this material shall comply with the requirements of the North Carolina Fertilizer Law and regulations adopted by the North Carolina Board of Agriculture. Fertilizer shall be 8-8-8 grade. Upon written approval of the Engineer a different grade of fertilizer may be used, provided the rate of application is adjusted to provide the same amounts of plant food. During handling and storing, the fertilizer shall be cared for in such a manner that it will be protected against hardening, caking, or loss of plant food values. Any Page 3 hardened or caked fertilizer shall be pulverized to its original conditions before being used. iii. Lime: The quality of lime and all operations in connection with the furnishing of this material shall comply with the requirements of the North Carolina Lime Law and regulations adopted by the North Carolina Board of Agriculture. During the handling and storing, the lime shall be cared for in such a manner that it will be protected against hardening and caking. Any hardened or caked lime shall be pulverized to its original condition before being used. Lime shall be agriculture grade ground dolumitic limestone. It shall contain not less than 85% of the calcium and magnesium carbonates and shall be of such fineness that at least 90% will pass a No. 10 sieve and at least 50% will pass a No. 100 sieve. iv. Seed: The quality of seed and all operations in connection with the furnishing of this material shall comply with the requirements of the North Carolina Seed Law and regulations adopted by the North Carolina Board of Agriculture. Seed shall have been approved by the North Carolina Department of Agriculture or any agency approved by the Engineer before being sown, and no seed will be accepted with a date of test more than nine (9) months prior to the date of sowing. Such testing however, will not relieve the Contractor from responsibility for furnishing and sowing seed that meets these specifications at the time of sowing. When a low percentage of germination causes the quality of the seed to fall below the minimum pure live seed specified, the Contractor may elect, subject to the approval of the Engineer, to increase the rate of seeding sufficiently to obtain the minimum pure live seed contents specified, provided that such an increase in seeding does not cause the quantity of noxious weed seed per square yard to exceed the quantity that would be allowable at the regular rate of seed. During handling and storing, the seed shall be cared for in such a manner that it will be protected from damage by heat, moisture, rodents, or other causes. Seed shall be entirely free from bulblets or seed of Johnson Grass, Nutgrass, Sandbur, Wild Onion, Wild Garlic, and Bermuda Grass. The specifications for restricted noxious weed seed refers to the number per pound, singly or collectively, of Blessed Thistle, Wild Radish, Canada Thistle, Corncockle, Field Bindwee, Quackgrass, Dodders, Dock, Horsenettle, Bracted Plantain, Buckhorn or Wild Mustard; but in no case shall the number of Blessed Thistle or Wild Radish exceed 27 seeds of each per pound. No tolerance on weed seed will be allowed. Page 4 V. Mulch: Straw mulch shall be threshed straw of oats, rye or wheat free from matured seed of obnoxious weeds or other species which would grow and be detrimental to the specified grass. 1.4b - Construction Requirements Topsoil shall be placed according to the following requirements: Use equipment and methods to prevent damage to existing structures, utilities, lawns and plantings. ii. Prior to placing topsoil, shape the subgrade to graded lines, and cross sections to provide for 6 inches of compacted topsoil. iii. After approval, place and spread topsoil to secure required depth after compaction; rake and remove materials larger than 2 inches. Compact with approved roller equipment. Finish smoothing even, and true to lines and grades indicated Seed, fertilizer and lime shall be applied according to the following: Seed shall be applied by means of a hydro -seeder or other approved methods. The rates of application of seed, fertilizer and limestone shall be as stated below. All rates are in pounds per acre: Fertilizer - 1200 lbs. per acre Lime - 4,000 lbs. per acre Fescue - 150 lbs. per acre Rye - 50 lbs. per acre Equipment to be used for the application, covering or compaction of limestone, fertilizer, and seed shall have been approved by the Engineer before being used on the project. Approval may be revoked at any time if equipment is not maintained in satisfactory working condition, or if the equipment operation damages the seed. Limestone, fertilizer, and seed shall be applied within 24 hours after completion of seedbed preparation unless otherwise permitted by the Engineer, but no limestone or fertilizer shall be distributed and no seed shall be sown when the Engineer determines that weather and soil conditions are unfavorable for such operations. Limestone may be applied as a part of the seedbed preparation, provided it is immediately worked into the soil. If not so applied, limestone and fertilizer shall be distributed uniformly over the prepared seedbed at the specific rate of application and then harrowed, raked, or otherwise thoroughly worked or mixed into the seedbed. Page 5 Seed shall be distributed uniformly over the seedbed at the required rate of application, and immediately harrowed, dragged, raked, or otherwise worked so as to cover the seed with a layer of soil. The depth of covering shall be as directed by the Engineer. If two kinds of seed are to be used which require different depths of covering, they shall be sown separately. When a combination seed and fertilizer drill is used, fertilizer may be drilled in with the seed after limestone has been applied and worked into the soil. If two kinds of seed are being used which require different depths of covering, the seed requiring the lighter covering may be sown broadcast or with a special attachment to the drill, or drilled lightly following the initial drilling operation. When a hydraulic seeder is used for application of seed and fertilizer, the seed shall not remain in water containing fertilizer for more than 30 minutes prior to application unless otherwise permitted by the Engineer. Immediately after seed has been properly covered the seedbed shall be compacted in the manner and degree approved by the Engineer. When adverse seeding conditions are encountered due to steepness of slope, height of slope, or soil conditions, the Engineer may direct or permit that modifications be made in the above requirements which pertain to incorporating limestone into the seedbed; covering limestone, seed, and fertilizer; and compaction of the seedbed. Such modifications may include but not be limited to the following: 1. The incorporation of limestone into the seedbed may be omitted on (a) cut slopes steeper than 2:1; (b) on 2:1 cut slopes when a seedbed has been prepared during the excavation of the cut and is still in an acceptable condition; or (c) on areas of slopes where the surface of the area is too rocky to permit the incorporation of the limestone. 2. The rates of application of limestone, fertilizer, and seed on slopes 2:1 or steeper or on rocky surfaces may be reduced or eliminated. 3. Compaction after seeding may be reduced or eliminated on slopes 2:1 or steeper, on rocky surfaces, or on other areas where soil conditions would make compaction undesirable. Mulch shall be applied according to the following: It shall be spread uniformly at a rate of two tons per acre in a continuous blanket over the areas specified. Before mulch is applied on cut or fill slopes which are 3:1 or flatter, and ditch slopes, the Contractor shall remove and dispose of all exposed stones in excess of 3 inches in diameter and all roots or other debris which will prevent proper contact of the mulch with the soil. Page 6 Mulch shall be applied within 24 hours after the completion of the seeding unless otherwise permitted by the Engineer. Care shall be exercised to prevent displacement of soil or seed or other damage to the seeded area during the mulching operations. Mulch shall be uniformly spread by hand or by approved mechanical spreaders or blowers which will provide an acceptable application. An acceptable application will be that which will allow some sunlight to penetrate and air to circulate but also partially shade the ground, reduce erosion, and conserve soil moisture. Mulch shall be held in place by applying a sufficient amount of asphalt or other approved binding material to assure that the mulch is properly held in place. The rate and method of application of binding material shall meet the approval of the Engineer. Where the binding material is not applied directly with the mulch it shall be applied immediately following the mulch operation. The Contractor shall take sufficient precautions to prevent mulch from entering drainage structures through displacement by wind, water, or other causes and shall promptly remove any blockage to drainage facilities which may occur. 1.4c - Construction Quality Assurance Requirements The project engineer shall ensure that the materials described above are utilized for the final cover and that their placement was done in accordance with the above detailed Construction Requirements. The engineer shall include in the quality assurance report a discussion of the quality control testing to ensure that the final cover is constructed according to the approved plans. The results of all testing shall be included in the CQA report including documentation of any failed test results, descriptions of the procedures used to correct the improperly installed material, and statements of all re -testing performed in accordance with the Division approved plans. 2.0 CLOSURE SCHEDULE 2.1 Notification of Division of Solid Waste Prior to beginning closure of the Jackson County Construction / Demolition Landfill, the owner will notify the Division of Solid Waste of the intent to close the unit. Probable Date of Closure: February 2003 2.2 Begin Closure Jackson County will begin closure activities of the Jackson County Construction / Demolition Landfill unit no later than 30 days after the date on which the Construction / Demolition unit receives the known final receipt of wastes. Probable Date: February 2003 Page 7 2.3 Completion of Closure Jackson County will complete closure activities of the Jackson County Construction / Demolition Landfill in accordance with the closure plan within 180 days following the beginning of closure as specified in paragraph (f). Extensions of the closure period may be granted by the Director of an approved State if the owner or operator demonstrates that closure will, of necessity, take longer than 180 days and he has taken and will continue to take all steps to prevent threats to human health and the environment from the unclosed Construction / Demolition unit. Probable Date: July 2003 2.4 Recording of Closure Following closure of the Jackson County Construction / Demolition Landfill, Jackson County will record a notation on the deed to the Jackson County Construction / Demolition landfill facility property, or some other instrument that is normally examined during a title search, and notify the Division of Solid Waste that the notation has been recorded. The notation on the deed must in perpetuity notify any potential purchaser of the property that: 1. The land has been previously used as a landfill facility; and 2. Its use is restricted under the Division of Solid Waste approved Closure Plan Probable Date: August 2003 2.5 Engineer's Certification Following closure, the owner or operator of the landfill shall notify the Division of Solid Waste that a certification, signed by the project engineer verifying that closure has been completed in accordance with the closure plan, has been placed in the operating record. 3.0 POST CLOSURE PLAN 3.1 Inspections Inspections of the final cover will be performed according to the table below and the condition of the facility will be recorded with notes, maps, and photographs. The inspection will take notice of- 1 . Eroded banks 2. Patches of dead vegetation 3. Animal burrows 4. Settlement 5. Cracks along the cover. Page 8 The inspector will note the condition of. 1. Concrete catch basins and stormwater control facilities 2. Gas monitoring wells 3. Water monitoring wells Areas showing subsidence, cracking, signs of erosion, or damage are to be repaired. Schedule of Inspections Years (following closure) Yearly Inspections 0-2 4 2-30 2 3.2 Maintenance The vegetative cover will be trimmed at least two times a year. In the early stages of development, fertilization will be applied annually as needed. Vegetative growth around methane gas vents will be cleaned away and all wells will be clearly marked to prevent accidental damage. 3.3 Monitoring Explosive gas monitoring will take place on a quarterly basis according to the procedural outline contained in the Operation Plan. Surface and ground water testing will take place semiannually or as directed by the Division of Solid Waste. 3.4 Planned use and personal contact Preliminary proposals for the planned use of the facility, following Closure are inconclusive. No definite plan has been determined as of yet. Most likely, the area will be restricted to landfill maintenance personnel only, thus insuring little or no damage to the final cap system. The person to contact regarding the facility during the Post -Closure period is: Jackson County Solid Waste Management Department Mr. Dave Fowler, Executive Director of Services Sylva, North Carolina Telephone (704) 586-7575 3.5 Water Quality Monitoring Plan A Sampling and Analysis was prepared for the Jackson County MS W Landfill by Law Engineering, Inc and will be used for the Jackson County Construction / Demolition Landfill. Page 9 This plan includes discussion of the sampling analysis procedures of the ground water monitoring plan. 3.6 Engineer's Certification Following completion of the post -closure care period, the owner or operator of the landfill shall notify the Division of Solid Waste that a certification, signed by the project engineer verifying that post -closure care has been completed in accordance with the post -closure plan, has been placed in the operating record. Page 10 4.0 CLOSURE AND POST CLOSURE COST ANALYSIS AND SUMMARY 4.1 Closure Costs Unit Cost Item 1 - Mobilization Item 2 - Erosion and Sedimentation Control 1,000 L.F.. Sediment Barriers 10 Acres Grassing 20 S.Y. Rip Rap 650 L.F. 18-inch Downdrain Item 3 - Earthwork 175,000 S.F. 18-inch Clay Cap $0.45 /S.F. 200 Tons 1.5% Bentonite Ad -Mix $150.00 /Ton 175,000 S.F. 18-inch Vegetative Cover $0.15 /S.F. Item 4 - Gas Controls 12 Each Gas Vents $900.00 Each Item 8 - Testing / Documentation Lump Sum Construction Cost Item 9 - Engineering / Inspection ( @5% of Const. Cost) Item 10 - Legal / Administration (@1% of Const. Cost) Item 11 - Contingencies (@5% of Const. Cost) Lump Sum $4.00 /L.F. $1,250.00 /Acres $25.00 /S.Y. $13.00 /L.F. MSW Landfill Total Closure Cost Page 11 Total Cost $10,000.00 $4,000.00 $12,500.00 $500.00 $8,450.00 $78,750.00 $30,000.00 $26,250.00 $10,800.00 $40,000.00 $221,250.00 $11,000.00 $2,200.00 $11,000.00 $245.450.00 Lump Sum $4.00 /L.F. $1,250.00 /Acres $25.00 /S.Y. $13.00 /L.F. MSW Landfill Total Closure Cost Page 11 Total Cost $10,000.00 $4,000.00 $12,500.00 $500.00 $8,450.00 $78,750.00 $30,000.00 $26,250.00 $10,800.00 $40,000.00 $221,250.00 $11,000.00 $2,200.00 $11,000.00 $245.450.00 4.2 Post -Closure Care Cost Item 1 - Environmental Monitoring Semi -Annual Ground Water Monitoring - 5 Wells @ $500/well/event $2,500 Semi Annual Surface Water Monitoring - 2 points @ $500/each/event $1,000 Quarterly Methane Gas Monitoring - 8 wells @ $50/well/event $400 Item 2 - Routine Repairs 1 acre repair, 1 foot depth, re -seeding, silt fence $10,000 Item 3 - Sediment Pond Cleanout $5,000 Item 4 - Grass Maintenance Cutting - 20 acres x $50/hr x 1 ac/hr x 2 cuts/yr $2,000 Re -seeding - 5 ac/yr @ $1000/ac $5,000 Subtotal $25,900 Contingencies - 10% $2,500 Total Yearly Cost $28,400 Page 12 5.0 FINANCIAL ASSURANCE The Financial Assurance provision of Subtitle D provides that owner and operators of landfills must provide for certain minimum measures to insure that the funds to meet the requirements of the regulations governing closure, post -closure and corrective action activities are available in the event that these actions are not taken by the owner or operator. The regulations addressing financial assurance are embodied in North Carolina Rule .1628. 5.1 NORTH CAROLINA RULE .1628 In general, Rule .1628 provides that the owner and/or operator must: 1. Provide accurate cost estimates for the closure and post -closure care. 2. Select a mechanism for demonstrating financial assurance. 3. Maintain the selected mechanism in compliance with the provisions of Rule .1628 throughout the period for which the owner/operator is subject to the provisions of Subtitle D and Rule .1628. The Rule provides for the following alternative mechanisms for demonstrating financial assurance: 1. Trust Fund. 2. Surety bond Guaranteeing Payment or Performance. 3. Letter of Credit. 4. Insurance. 5. Capital Reserve Fund. 6. Local Government Financial Test. 7. Multiple Mechanisms. Jackson County has reviewed the requirements associated with each of these mechanisms and assessed the costs related to their use as the County`s financial assurance mechanism. Although the relative cost of these mechanisms does not appear to vary significantly, there are various factors associated with their availability and practicality which make certain of the mechanisms less attractive than others. 5.2 LOCAL GOVERNMENT FINANCIAL TEST Therefore, Jackson County has elected to adopt the LOCAL GOVERNMENT FINANCIAL TEST. The Local Government Financial Test is attractive because the County's excellent financial conditions makes passing the test quite feasible. Page 13 CLOSURE AND POST CLOSURE PLAN Jackson County MSW Landfill The attached Closure and Post -Closure Plan was taken from the Transition Plan for the Jackson County MSW Landfill. The plan was prepared by McGill Associates, P.A. using Rule .1630 as a guide. 8.0 CLOSURE PLAN Although capacity computations indicate that Jackson County has sufficient space to operate until September, 1998, the new .1600 regulations will require it to close no later than January of 1998. Because of operational restraints due to the size of the landfill, and mobilization costs associated with the final cap installation, it is our opinion that the final cap system should be applied in a single operation. By installing the entire cap during a single operation, it will simplify the installation process, insure consistency of materials, decrease mobilization and material costs, and increase quality assurance of the final product. Also, it will reduce the possibility of damage to the cap and consequentially keep future maintenance costs to a minimum. 8.1 CAP DESCRIPTION AND CONSTRUCTION A cross-section of the final cap is contained in figure 12. 8.1.1 Cap Foundation Cover The cap foundation cover is designed to minimize infiltration into the Landfill prior to placement of the barrier cap to provide a sound working platform over the municipal solid waste. A soil barrier will consist of the 6-inch compacted daily cover. THe compacted cap foundation cover will extend over the entire waste area and onto the existing perimeter embankment. 8.1.2 Low Permeable Barrier Cap The function of the low permeable barrier cap is to prevent water that infiltrates through the overlying root zone from entering the underlying waste cell. The low permeable barrier cap consists of an 18 inch thick compacted low permeable soil. The low permeable barrier cap will require a permeability coefficient of at least 1x10-5 cm/sec. The soils may be native low -permeable soils or a soil-bentonite mixture. The design of the Landfill cap should provide for a minimum number of penetrations through the low permeable barrier cap. The only required penetrations are for the methane gas collection system. 8.1.3 Methane Gas Removal System A passive methane gas removal system has been included with the final cap configuration. The passive gas collection system will be designed to remove methane gas that collects beneath the final cap. The gas collection system will consist of screened extraction wells and a series of perforated pipes set within gravel lined channels. The methane extraction wells are to be constructed prior to final capping. Approximately 25 gas extraction wells are planned over the 13.7 acre Landfill area. The typical well cross section penetrates the waste mass with a collection system allowing a vertical migration of methane gasses. 8.1.4 Final Cover The final cover will be a total of 6-inches of topsoil. The soil cover will provide support for vegetative cover and protect the low -permeable barrier. A grass cover is proposed for the Landfill to provide the required cover while minimizing cap maintenance. The surface will be prepared by fertilizing and placing seed in accordance with the North Carolina Erosion and Sediment Control Standards. The design objectives in evaluating the vegetative cover include: 1. A drought resistant vegetative cap with a two -foot storage limitation 2. A low maintenance cover 3. Cover selection to minimize volunteer vegetation 4. Erodability of cover soils and drainage ditches 5. Tolerance of final side slopes 8.2 AREA AND WASTE ESTIMATES For reasons discussed in Section 8.1, Jackson County will install their final cap system in a single operation. The phasing of the landfills remaining volume has been submitted -as part of the landfills vertical extension design submitted by CSL Group entitled Jackson County Landfill - Vertical Extension - Phases I and II and approved by the State's Solid and Hazardous Waste Management Branch on February 17, 1992 as an Amendment to Permit #50-02 - Jackson County. 8.3 SLOPE STABILITY ANALYSIS Reference Section 4.1 - Cap Slope Stability of Portion of Transition Plan - Existing Jackson County MSWLF by Law Engineering. Computations relating to stability of the final cap are contained in Appendix E of this report. 8.4 CLOSURE SCHEDULE 8.4.1 Notification of Division Prior to beginning closure of each MSWLF unit as specified in 258.60(f), an owner or operator must notify the State Director that a notice of the intent to close the unit has been placed in the operating record. Probable Date: January, 1998 8.4.2 Begin Closure The owner or operator must begin closure activities of each MSWLF unit no later than 30 days after the date on which the MSWLF unit receives the known final receipt of wastes or , if the MSWLF unit has remaining capacity and there is a reasonable likelihood that the MSWLF unit will receive additional wastes, no later than one year after the most recent receipt of wastes. Extensions beyond the one-year deadline for beginning closure may be granted by the Director of an approved State if the owner or operator demonstrates that the MSWLF unit has the capacity to receive additional wastes and the owner or operator has taken and will continue to take all steps necessary to prevent threats to human health and the environment from the unclosed MSWLF unit. Probable Date: February, 1998 8.4.3 Completion of Closure The owner or operator of all MSWLF units must complete closure activities of each MSWLF unit in accordance with the closure plan within 180 days following the beginning of closure as specified in paragraph (f). Extensions of the closure period may be granted by the Director of an approved State if teh owner or operator demonstrates that closure will, of necessity, take longer than 180 days and he has taken and will continue to take all steps to prevent threats to human health and the environment from the unclosed MSWLF unit. Probable Date: August, 1998 8.4.4 Recording of Closure Following closure of all MSWLF units, the owner or operator must record a notation on the deed to the landfill facility property, or some other instrument that is normally examined during title search, and notify the State Director that the notation has been recorded and a copy has been placed in the operating record. The notation on the deed must in perpetuity notify any potential purchaser of the property that: 1. The land has been used as a landfill facility; and 2. Its use is restricted under 258.61(c)(3) The owner or operator may request permission from the Director of an approved State to remove the notation from the deed if all wastes are removed from the facility. Probable Date: September, 1998 9.0 POST CLOSURE PLAN 9.1 Inspections Regular inspections of the final cover will be performed at regular intervals and the condition of the facility will be recorded with notes, maps, and photographs. The inspector will take notice of: 1. Eroded banks 2. Patches of dead vegetation 3. Animal burrown 4. Subsidence 5. Cracks along the cover. The inspector will note the condition of: 1. Sedimentation basins 2. Storm Water Collection Systems 3. Gas monitoring probes 4. Water monitoring wells Areas showing subsidence, cracking, signs of erosion, or damage should be repaired. 9.2 Maintenance The vegetative cover will be trimmed at least two times a year. In the early stages of development, fertilization should be applied annually. The Gas Removal System will be flushed and pressure -cleaned annually. Vegetative growth around wells will be cleared away and wells will be clearly marked to prevent accidental damage. Sedimentation basins and storm water collection systems will be examined for damage after major storm events, and cleaned of vegetation and debree when necessary. 9.3 Monitoring Explosive gas monitoring will take place on a quarterly basis according to the procedural outline contained in the Operation Plan. Surface and ground water testing will take place twice a year. 9.4 Planned Use and Personal Contact Preliminary proposals for the planned use of the facility, following Closure are inconclusive. No definite plan has been determined as of yet. Most likely, the area will be restricted to landfill maintenance personnel only, thus insuring little or no damage to the final cap system. The person to contact regarding the facility during the Post -Closure period is: Director of Planning Jackson County (Mr. Tom Massie) 8 Ridgeway Street Sylva, North Carolina 28779 Telephone (704) (586-4055) 10.0 CLOSURE AND POST -CLOSURE COST ANALYSIS SUMMARY 10.1 CLOSURE COSTS 10.1.1 Final Cap Systems 1. Soil (clay, borrow soil, topsoil, etc.) 13.7 Ac. of 18" low permeable bentonite/soil layer: 33,154 CY @ $6/CY (mixed, placed, compacted) = $198,900 13.7 Ac. of 6" topsoil layer: 11,050 CY @ $4/CY (placed) = $44,200 Bentonite: 10 Tons/100 CY x 33,154 CY = 3,315 Tons 3,315 Tons @ $150/Ton = $ 497,300 2. Testing/Documentation One (1) Permeability test per 1000 CY 33 tests @ $ 350 Each = $ 11,600 Total Cost of Final Cap System = $ 752,000 10.1.2 Sedimentation and Erosion Control Devices (4) Drop Inlets @ $ 1000 Each = $ 4000 200 LF 24" RCP @ $ 50/1-F = $ 10,000 200 LF 30" RCP @ $ 60/1-F = $ 12,000 300 CY Riprap @ $ 30/CY = $ 9,000 500 LF Silt Fence @ $ 1 /LF = $ 500 Total Cost = $ 35,500 10.1.3 Gas Controls (25) Gas Vents (installed): (25) Gas Vents @ $200 Each = $5,000 2,500 LF 2" Perforated PVC @ $4/LF = $10,000 300 CY #67 Stone @ $ 24/CY = $7,200 Total Cost = $ 22,500 10.1.4 Final Landscaping Seeding/Fertilizing/Mulching: $ 1,000/Ac x 13.7 Ac = $13, 700 Total Construction Cost = $ 823,700 10.1.5 Engineering/Inspection 5.0% x (Construction Cost): .050 x $ 823,700 = $ 41,200 10.1.6 Legal/Administrative 1.0% x (Construction Cost): .010 x $ 823,700 = $ 8,200 10.1.7 Contingencies 10.0% x (Construction Cost): .10 x $ 823,700 = $ 82,400 TOTAL CLOSURE COST = $ 955,500 10.2 POST -CLOSURE CARE COSTS 10.2.1 Inspections/Record Keeping $ 500/Yr. 10.2.2 Monitoring 1. Explosive Gases: Quarterly/Yr. @ $100 Ea. _ $400/Yr. 2. Surface Water: (2) Tests/Yr x 2 Locations x $700 Ea. _ $2,800/Yr 3. Ground Water: (2) Tests/Yr x 5 Locations x $700 Ea. _ $7,000/Yr 4. Leachate ..... N/A 5. Air Quality ..... N/A Total Monitoring Cost = $ 10,200 10.2.3 Leachate Collection and Treatment .... N/A 10.2.4 Maintenance (preventative/corrective) 1. Leachate Collection Removal and Treatment Systems ( Annual Cleaning ) ..... N/A 2. Operate Gas Removal Systems $ 300/Yr 3. Wells $ 300/Yr 4. Final Cover (mowing, replace plantings, fill for erosion, etc.) $ 1800/ T r Subtotal: Annual Post -Closure Care Costs = $ 13,100 10.2.5 Fees ...... N/A 10.2.6 Administration 5 % of total annual cost: .01 x $13,100 = $ 700 per year 10.2.7 Contingencies 10 % of total annual cost: .10 x $13,100 = $ 1,300 per year TOTAL ANNUAL POST -CLOSURE CARE COST = $ 15,100 11.0 FINANCIAL ASSURANCE Tha Financial Qcci tranra nrrniicinn of Cilbtitia r) nrnvirie that n%nrnpr(z an Prat rn c of Municipal Solid Waste Landfills (MSWLF) must provide for certain minimum measures to insure that the funds to meet the requirements of the regulations governing closure, post -closure and corrective action activities are available in the event that these actions are not taken by the owner or operator. The regulations addressing financial assurance are embodied in North Carolina Rule .1628. 11.1 North Carolina Rule .1628 In general, Rule .1628 provides that the owner and/or operator must: 1. Provide accurate cost estimates for the closure and post -closure care. 2. Select a mechanism for demonstrating financial assurance. 3. Maintain the selected mechanism in compliance with the provisions of Rule .1628 throughout the period for which the owner/operator is subject to the provisions of Subtitle D and Rule .1628. The Rule provides for the following alternative mechanisms for demonstrating financial assurance: 1. Trust Fund. 2. Surety Bond Guaranteeing Payment or Performance. 3. Letter of Credit. 4. Insurance. 5. Capital Reserve Fund. 6. Local Government Financial Test. 7. Multiple Mechanisms. Jackson County has reviewed that requirements associated with each of these mechanisms and assessed the costs related to their use as the County's financial assurance mechanism. Although the relative cost of these mechanisms does not appear to vary significantly, there are various factors associated with their availability and practicality which make certain of the mechanisms less attractive than others. 11.2 Multiple Mechanism Approach Therefore, Jackson County has elected to adopt the Multiple Mechanism approach for financial assurance. The County's principal mechanism will be the LOCAL GOVERNMENT FINANCIAL TEST. The secondary mechanism will be the CAPITAL RESERVE FUND. The Local Government Financial Test is attractive because the County's excellent financial conditions makes passing the test quite feasible. However, the use of the Capital Reserve Fund insures that the appropriate funds are set aside during the pay -in period to avoid the necessity to appropriate the required closure cost in a single fiscal year or to finance those costs in future years. The second major reason for the complimentary reserve fund is to hedge the County's position in the event that the County were to fail the Financial Assurance Test in a given year. In that event, the reserve fund can be used to satisfy the financial assurance requirements beyond that level of compliance which can be achieved with the test. In other words, if the county needed a certain amount of assets to meet the test ratios, the value of the reserve fund could be utilized to meet the deficiency. 11.3 Requirements for April 9 Deadline Rule .1628 requires that the County's chosen mechanism(s) must be in effect by the April 9 deadline for submission of the Transition Plan. Therefore, certain actions must be taken by Jackson County to address this requirement. The County has taken the following steps: 1. The Local Government Financial Assurance Test has been completed and certified by the Chief Financial Officer. It is included in the Transition Plan. 2. Annual disclosure to the public shall be presumed to be achieved with the publication of the County's annual audit. 3. The Financial Test is accompanied by a letter from the County's Chief Financial Officer. The letter has also be placed in the County's official operating record. The Finance Officer's letter is based upon the model letter provided by the State to guide in its preparation. The letter addresses the following elements: a. Lasts all the current cost estimates covered by the financial test. b. Provides evidence and certifies that the County meets all of the conditions of the test. Reference Appendix D for Letter from the Counts Financial Officer and Indicators of Financial Strength