24029; Initial Soil Stockpiling EMP_10-1-2020 final

Rejalwe Wranmenfal SeMcer, PLL(
October 1, 2020
Ms. Carolyn Minnich
NCDEQ - Division of Waste Management
Brownfields Program
610 East Center Avenue, Suite 301
Mooresville, North Carolina 28115
Re: EMP (Revision #1)
694 W. Crowell Street (Site)
Monroe, North Carolina
Brownfields Project No. 24029-20-090
Dear Ms. Minnich:
Via Email: carolyn.min [e-mail]
Please find attached, a revised version of the Environmental Management Plan (EMP) forthe above -referenced site, based
on your comments dated September 25, 2020. Upon your review and approval, signatures will be obtained for Page 23
and the final version of the EMP will be submitted. If you have any questions regarding the plan, please feel free to contact
me at [phone].
Sincerely,
Resolve Environmental Services, PLLC
Laura Minor
Project Manager
attachment
cc: Mr. Brian Borne (City of Monroe) and Ms. Fern Paterson (Parker Poe)

NORTH CAROLINA BROWNFIELDS PROGRAM
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN
This form is to be used to prepare an Environmental Management Plan (EMP) for projects in
the North Carolina Brownfields Program at the direction of a Brownfields project manager.
The EMP is a typical requirement of a Brownfields Agreement (BFA). Its purpose is to clarify
actions to be taken during the demolition and construction at Brownfields properties in an
effort to avoid delays in the event of the discovery of new contamination sources or other
environmental conditions. The EMP provides a means to document redevelopment plans and
environmental data for each applicable environmental medium to inform regulatory -compliant
decision -making at the site. As much detail as possible should be included in the EMP,
including contingency planning for unknowns. Consult your project manager if you have
questions.
Prospective Developers and/or their consultants must complete and submit this form and all
pertinent attachments, see checklist below, to their Brownfields project manager prior to any
earthmoving or other development -related activities that have the potential to disturb soil at
the Brownfields Property, including demolition. For the resultant EMP to be valid for use, it
must be completed, reviewed by the program, signed by all parties working on the project,
and approved by the Brownfields project manager. Failure to comply with the requirements of
the EMP could jeopardize project eligibility, or in the event of a completed agreement, be
cause for a reopener
So that the EMP provides value in protecting brownfields eligibility and public health, the
preparer shall ensure that the following steps have been completed prior to submitting the
EMP for review. Any EMP prepared without completing these steps is premature.
❑ Site sampling and assessment that meets Brownfields' objectives is complete and has
been reviewed and approved by the Brownfields Project Manager.
® Specific redevelopment plans, even if conceptual, have been developed for the project,
submitted and reviewed by the Brownfields Project Manager.
EMP Version 2, June 2018

Please submit, along with the completed EMP form, the following attachments, as relevant
and applicable to the proposed redevelopment:
❑ A set of redevelopment plans, including architectural/engineering plans, if available; if
not conceptual plans may suffice if updated when detailed plans are drafted.
® A figure overlaying redevelopment plans on a map of the extent of contamination for
each media.
❑ Site grading plans that include a cut and fill analysis.
❑ A figure showing the proposed location and depth of impacted soil that would remain
on site after construction grading.
❑ Any necessary permits for redevelopment (i.e. demolition, etc.).
❑ A detailed construction schedule that includes timing and phases of construction.
® Tabulated data summaries for each impacted media (i.e. soil, groundwater, soil gas,
etc.) applicable to the proposed redevelopment.
® Figures with the sampling locations and contamination extents for each impacted media
applicable to the proposed redevelopment.
❑ A full final grade sampling and analysis plan, if the redevelopment plan is final.
❑ If known, information about each proposed potential borrow soil source, such as aerial
photos, historic site maps, historic Sanborn maps, a site history, necessary for
brownfields approval.
❑ Information and, analytical data if required, for quarries, or other borrow sources,
detailing the type of material proposed for importation to the Brownfields Property.
® A work plan for the sampling and analysis of soil to be brought onto the Brownfields
Property. Refer to Issue Resolution 15 in Brownfields Program Guidelines.
❑ A map of the Brownfields Property showing the location of soils proposed for export
and sampling data from those areas.
❑ If a Vapor Mitigation System is required by the Brownfields Program, the Vapor
Intrusion Mitigation System (VIMS) plan will be signed and sealed by a NC Professional
Engineer. The VIMS Plan may also be submitted under separate cover.
EMP Version 2, June 2018

Date: 10/1/2020
GENERAL INFORMATION
Revision Date (if applicable): Click or tap to enter a date.
Brownfields Assigned Project Name: 694 W Crowell Street
Brownfields Project Number: 24029-20-090
Brownfields Property Address: 694 West Crowell Street, Monroe, North Carolina 28112
Brownfields Property Area (acres): 2.97
Is Brownfields Property Subject to RCRA Permit? ....................... ❑ Yes ® No
If yes enter Permit No.: _11L,N LJ1 LOP oere to enter te,
Is Brownfields Property Subject to a Solid Waste Permit............ ❑ Yes ® No
If yes, enter Permit No.: Click or tap here to enter text.
COMMUNICATIONS
A copy of this EMP shall be distributed to all the parties below as well as any contractors or site workers
that may be exposed to site vapors, soil, groundwater, and/or surface water. Additionally, a copy of the
EMP shall be maintained at the Brownfields Property during redevelopment activities. NOTE, THE EMP
DOES NOT TAKE THE PLACE OF A SITE -SPECIFIC HEALTH AND SAFETY PLAN.
Prospective Developer (PD): City of Monroe, a North Carolina Municipal Corporation
Contact Person: Larry Faison
Phone Numbers: Office: 704-282-4501 Mobile: Click or tap here to enter text.
Email: [e-mail]
Contractor for PD: Parker Poe Adams & Bernstein LLP
Contact Person: Fern A. Paterson
Phone Numbers: Office: 704-335-9891 Mobile: Click or tap here to enter text.
Email: [e-mail]
Environmental Consultant: Resolve Environmental Services, PLLC
Contact Person: Terry D. Kennedy, P.G.
Phone Numbers: Office: 704-289-5881 Mobile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Brownfields Program Project Manager: Carolyn Minnich
Phone Numbers: Office: 704-661-0330 Mobile: Click or tap here to enter text.
Email: [e-mail]
Other DEQ Program Contacts (if applicable, i.e., UST Section, Inactive Hazardous Site Branch,
3
EMP Version 2, June 2018

Hazardous Waste, Solid Waste):
UICK or iap nere io enier iexi.
NOTIFICATIONS TO THE BROWNFIELDS PROGRAM
Written advance Notification Times to Brownfields Project Manager: Check each box to accept
minimum advance notice periods (in calendar days) for each type of onsitetask:
On -site assessment or remedial activities: .................................................... 10 days Prior
Construction or grading start: .......................................................................... 10 days Prior
Discovery of stained soil, odors, USTs, buried drums or waste, landfill, or other signs of previously
unknown contamination: ................................................................................ Within 48 hours
Implementation of emergency actions (e.g. dewatering, flood or soil erosion control measures in
area of contamination, ventilation of work zones): ................................... Within 48 hours
Installation of mitigation systems:......
10 days Prior
Other notifications as required by local, state or federal agencies to implement redevelopment
activities: (as applicable): ................................................................................. Within 30 days
REDEVELOPMENT PLANS
1) Type of Redevelopment (check all that apply):
❑Residential ❑Recreational ®Institutional ❑Commercial ❑Office ❑Retail ❑ Industrial
®Other specify:
The property will be used to stockpile acceptable imported soils used for the redevelopment of
the neighboring Brownfields site (Former Scott Aviation (09042-05-090) or used in the future during
onsite redevelopment activities.
2) Check the following activities that will be conducted prior to commencing earth -moving activities
at the site:
® Review of historic maps (Sanborn Maps, facility maps)
❑ Conducting geophysical surveys to evaluate the location of suspect UST, fuel lines, utility
lines, etc.
® Interviews with employees/former employees/facility managers/neighbors
3) Summary of Redevelopment Plans (MANDATORY: attach detailed plans or conceptual plans, if
detailed plans are not available. EMP review without such information would be premature):
Provide brief summary of redevelopment plans, including demolition, removal of building
EMP Version 2, June 2018

slabs/pavement, grading plans and planned construction of new structures:
The proposed initial redevelopment of the property will be limited to the stockpiling of imported
soil as part of the redevelopment of the neighboring Former Scott Aviation Brownfields site
Brownfields Project # 09042-05-090 or the eventual redevelopment of the subject property.
Borrow source soils that have been approved by the NCDEQ for import following required
sampling will be stockpiled at the site and used, as needed, for the redevelopment of the
adjacent site (Former Scott Aviation site, aka the proposed Monroe Police Department/Fire
Department) or for the eventual redevelopment of the subject property as stated above.
Soils will be stockpiled on site in accordance with an approved sedimentation erosion control
plan to be developed for the site at a later date.
No native soil export from the site or site re -grading is being considered at this time.
Stockpiled soils will be transported from the subject site (694 W Crowell St) to the adjoining
Brownfields site (09042 Former Scott Aviation) by trucks and heavy equipment.
The estimated soil volume requiring stockpiling on -site at this time is estimated to not exceed
20,000 yards.
Soil quality at the (09042) Former Scott Aviation Site is currently at or below the
industrial/commercial standards. All proposed "clean fill" will be imported from permitted
borrow facilities. The imported soil from the permitted borrow facilities will be sampled in
accordance with an Import Soil Plan, preapproved by the Brownfields Program. The results of the
sampling plan will be submitted for review and approval by the Brownfields Manager prior to
importing. Any soils imported from another Brownfields site(s), if any, will be sampled in
accordance with an Import and Export sampling plan pre -approved by the respective Brownfields
Project Managers.
The proposed redevelopment map is included in Appendix A.
4) Do plans include demolition of structure(s)?:
❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown
❑ If yes, please check here to confirm that demolition will be conducted in accordance with
applicable legal requirements, including without limitation those related to lead and asbestos
abatement that are administered by the Health Hazards Control Unit within the Division of Public
Health of the North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services. If available, please
provide a copy of your demolition permit.
5) Are sediment and erosion control measures required by federal, state, or local regulations?
® Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
® If Yes, please check here to confirm that demolition will be conducted in accordance with
EMP Version 2, June 2018

applicable legal requirements. If soil disturbance is necessary to install sediment and erosion
control measures, they may not begin until this EMP is approved.
6) Which category of risk -based screening level is used or is anticipated to be specified in the
Brownfields Agreement? Note: If children frequent the property, residential screening levels shall
be cited in the Brownfields Agreement for comparison purposes.
❑ Residential ® Non -Residential or Industrial/Commercial
7) Schedule for Redevelopment (attach construction schedule):
a) Construction start date: 11/2/2020
b) Anticipated duration (specify activities during each phase):
Bid solicitation for site redevelopment of the Police Department/Fire Department is
scheduled for December 2020 and bid award scheduled for January 2021. The awarded
general contractor will provide a detailed timeline for project completion at that time.
The soil stockpiling activities are expected to be in use throughout the development of the
adjoining proposed Police Department/Fire Department development. At this time. It is
anticipated that stockpiling could extend over a period of 24 months or longer.
More detailed timelines for the phases and phase durations will be determined by the
awarded contractor.
c) Additional phases planned? ❑ Yes ❑ No
If yes, specify the start date and/or activities if known:
Start Date: TBD
Planned Activity:
Additional phases are planned; however, the check box above in section c) does not permit
editing in this NCDEQ template format. Determination of the final usage of the property by
the City of Monroe has yet to be determined.
Start Date: Click or tap to enter a date.
Planned Activity:
Click or tap here to enter text.
Start Date: Click or tap to enter a date.
Planned Activity:
d) Provide the planned date of occupancy for new buildings: Click or tap to enter a date.
CONTAMINATED MEDIA
EMP Version 2, June 2018

1) Contaminated Media on the Brownfields Property
Part 1. Soil: ..............................................................
❑
Yes
® No
❑ Suspected
Part 2. Groundwater: ............................................
®
Yes
❑ No
❑ Suspected
Part 3. Surface Water: ..........................................
❑
Yes
® No
❑ Suspected
Part 4. Sediment: ...................................................
❑
Yes
® No
❑ Suspected
Part 5. Soil Vapor: ..................................................
❑
Yes
❑ No
® Suspected
Part 6. Sub -Slab Soil Vapor: ..................................
❑
Yes
® No
❑ Suspected
Part 7. Indoor Air: ...................................................
❑
Yes
® No
❑ Suspected
2) For the Area of Proposed Redevelopment on the Brownfields Property, attach tabulated data
summaries for each impacted media and figure(s) with sample locations.
PART 1. Soil — Please fill out the information below, using detailed site plans, if available, or estimate
using known areas of contaminated soil and a conceptual redevelopment plan. Provide a figure
overlaying new construction onto figure showing contaminated soil and groundwater locations.
1) Known or suspected contaminants in soil (list general groups of contaminants):
No known contaminants in soil.
2) Depth of known or suspected contaminants (feet):
No known contaminants in soil.
3) Area of soil disturbed by redevelopment (square feet):
Redevelopment not currently planned, only using site for stockpiling soils.
4) Depths of soil to be excavated (feet):
No excavation currently planned at site.
5) Estimated volume of soil (cubic yards) to be excavated (attach grading plan):
No excavation currently planned at site.
6) Estimated volume of excavated soil (cubic yards) anticipated to be impacted by contaminants:
Contamination of soils not expected during future excavation.
7) Estimated volume of contaminated soil expected to be disposed of offsite, if applicable:
No offsite disposal of soil currently planned for site.
Part I.A. MANAGING ONSITE SOIL
If soil is anticipated to be excavated from the Brownfield Property, relocated on the Brownfields
Property, or otherwise disturbed during site grading or other redevelopment activities, please
provide a grading plan that clearly illustrates areas of cut and fill (approximate areas & volumes are
acceptable, if only preliminarydata available).
7
EMP Version 2, June 2018

1) HAZARDOUS WASTE DETERMINATION:
a) Does the soil contain a LISTED WASTE as defined in the North Carolina Hazardous
Waste Section under 40 CFR Part 261.31-261.35?....................................... ❑Yes ®No
❑ If yes, explain why below, including the level of knowledge regarding processes
generating the waste (include pertinent analytical results as needed).
Click or tap here to enter text.
❑ If yes, do the soils exceed the "Contained -Out" levels in Attachment 1 of the
North Carolina Contained -In Policy? ................................................. ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) NOTE: IF SOIL MEETS THE DEFINITION OF A LISTED HAZARDOUS WASTE AND EXCEEDS
THE CONTAINED -OUT LEVELS IN ATTACHMENT 1 TO THE NORTH CAROLINA
CONTAINED -IN POLICYTHE SOIL MAY NOT BE RE -USED ON SITE AND MUST BE
DISPOSED OF IN ACCORDANCE WITH DEQ HAZARDOUS WASTE SECTION RULES AND
REGULATIONS.
c) Does the soil contain a CHARACTERISTIC WASTE? .................................... ❑ Yes ® No
❑ If yes, mark reason(s) why below (and include pertinent analytical results).
❑ Ignitability Click or tap here to enter text.
❑ Corrosivity Click or tap here to enter text.
❑ Reactivity Click or tap here to enter text.
❑ Toxicity ick or tap here to enter text.
❑ TCLP results 'ick or tap here to enter text.
❑ Rule of 20 results (20 times total analytical results for an individual
hazardous constituent on TCLP list cannot, by test method, exceed regulatory
TCLP standard)
Click or tap here to enter text.
® If no, explain rationale:
Characteristic waste in soil was not identified at the site during the Phase II ESA
or the Brownfields Assessment Report.
d) NOTE: IF SOIL MEETS THE DEFINITION OF A CHARACTERISTIC HAZARDOUS WASTE, THE
SOIL MAYNOT BE RE -USED ON SITE AND MUST BE DISPOSED OF IN ACCORDANCE
WITH DEQ HAZARDOUS WASTE SECTION RULES AND REGULATIONS.
2) Screening criteria by which soil disposition decisions will be made (e.g., left in place, capped in
place with low permeability barrier, removed to onsite location and capped, removed offsite):
❑ Preliminary Health -Based Residential SRGs
© Preliminary Health -Based Industrial/Commercial SRGs
8
EMP Version 2, June 2018

® Division of Waste Management Risk Calculator (For Brownfields Properties Only)
❑ Site -specific risk -based cleanup level. Please provide details of methods used for
determination/explanation.
Click or tap here to enter text.
Additional comments:
Click or tap here to enter text.
3) If known impacted soil is proposed to be reused within the Brownfields Property Boundary,
please check the measures that will be utilized to ensure safe placement and documentation of
same. Please attach a proposed location diagram/site map.
❑ Provide documentation of analytical report(s) to Brownfields Project Manager
❑ Provide documentation of final location, thickness and depth of relocated soil on site map
to Brownfields Project Manager once known
❑ Geotextile to mark depth of fill material.
Provide description of material:
Click or tap here to enter text.
❑ Manage soil under impervious cap ❑ or clean fill ❑
❑ Describe cap or fill:
Click or tap here to enter text.
® Confer with NC BF Project Manager if Brownfield Plat must be revised (or re -recorded if
actions are Post -Recordation).
® GPS the location and provide site map with final location.
❑ Other. Please provide a description of the measure:
Click or tap here to enter te>
4) Please describe the following action(s) to be taken during and following excavation and
management of site soils:
Management of fugitive dust from site
® Yes, describe the method will include:
If necessary, BMPs, including spraying soils with water to minimize visual dust, will be
followed during management of soils. The excavation contractor will load and transport
stockpiled soil during appropriate weather conditions to minimize fugitive dust.
❑ No, explain rationale:
:lick or tap here to enter text.
Field Screening of site soil
❑ Yes, describe the field screening method, frequency of field screening, person conducting
field screening:
EMP Version 2, June 2018

Click or tap here to enter text.
❑ No, explain rationale:
Characteristic waste in soil was not identified at the site during the Phase II ESA or the
Brownfields Assessment Report. Imported soils will be screened prior to receiving
approval to stockpile on subject site.
Soil Sample Collection
❑ Yes, describe the sampling method (e.g., in -situ grab, composite, stockpile, etc.):
❑ No, explain rationale:
Characteristic waste in soil was not identified at the site during the Phase II ESA or the
Brownfields Assessment Report. Imported soils will be screened prior to receiving
approval to stockpile on subject site.
If soil samples are collected for analysis, please check the applicable chemical analytes:
❑ Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by EPA Method 8260
❑ Semi -volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) by EPA Method 8270
❑ Metals RCRA List (8) (arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium, mercury, lead, selenium
and silver): Specify Analytical Method Number(s):
Click or tap here to enter text.
❑ Pesticides: Specify Analytical Method Number(s):
Click or tap here to enter text.
❑ PCBs: Specify Analytical Method Number(s):
Click or tap here to enter text.
❑ Other Constituents & Respective Analytical Method(s) (i.e. Hexavalent Chromium,
Herbicides, etc.): Specify Analytical Method Number(s):
Click or tap here to enter text.
® Check to confirm that stockpiling of known or suspected impacted soils will be conducted
in accordance with Figure 1 of this EMP. Stockpile methodology should provide erosion
control, prohibiting contact between surface water/precipitation and contaminated soil,
and preventing contaminated runoff. Explain any variances or provide additional details as
needed:
Soils with no known or suspected impacts will be stockpiled on site as directed by the GC. Imported
soil with known or suspected impacts (from another Brownfields site will be stockpiled on site in
accordance with Figure 1 and NCDEQ guidelines).
❑ Final grade sampling of exposed native soil (i.e., soil that will not be under buildings or
permanent hardscape). Select chemical analyses for final grade samples with check boxes
10
EMP Version 2, June 2018

below (Check all thatapply):
❑ Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by EPA Method 8260
❑ Semi -volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) by EPA Method 8270
❑ Metals RCRA List (8) (arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium, mercury, lead,
selenium and silver): Specify Analytical Method Number(s):
Click or tap here to enter text
❑ Pesticides: Specify Analytical Method Number(s):
Click or tap here to e
❑ PCBs: Specify Analytical Method Number(s):
Click or tap here to enter text
❑ Other Constituents & Respective Analytical Method(s) (i.e. Hexavalent
Chromium, Herbicides, etc.):
Click or tap here to enter text
Please provide a scope of work for final grade sampling, including a diagram of soil
sampling locations, number of samples to be collected, and brief sampling methodology.
Samples should be collected from 0-2 ft below ground surface, with the exception of VOCs
which should be taken from 1-2 ft below ground surface. Alternatively, a work plan for
final grade sampling may be submitted under separate cover.
® If final grade sampling was NOT selected please explain rationale:
Site grading is not anticipated in this EMP. No grading, cutting or filling is part of the
proposed redevelopment plan for the site at this time.
Part 1.13. IMPORTED FILL SOIL
NO SOIL MAY BE BROUGHT ONTO THE BROWNFIELDS PROPERTY WITHOUT PRIOR APPROVAL
FROM THE BROWNFIELDS PROGRAM. According to the Brownfields IR 15, "Documenting
imported soil (by sampling, analysis, and reporting in accordance with review and written
approval in advance by the Brownfields Program), will safeguard the liability protections provided
by the brownfields agreement and is in the best interest of the prospective developer/property
owner."
Requirements for importing fill:
1) Will fill soil be imported to the site? ................................................ ® Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
2) If yes, what is the estimated volume of fill soil to be imported?
Up to 20,000 yds3 of imported fill may be stockpiled on the site for use at the adjoining Police
Department/Fire Department redevelopment over the lifetime of the project (or for use for
11
EMP Version 2, June 2018

redevelopment of the subject site).
3) If yes, what is the anticipated depth that fill soil will be placed at the property? (if a range
of depths, please list the range.)
The proposed initial redevelopment of the property will be limited to the stockpiling of imported
soil as part of the redevelopment of the neighboring Former Scott Aviation Brownfields site
(Brownfields Project # 09042-05-090) or the eventual redevelopment of the subject property.
Borrow source soils that have been approved by the NCDEQ for import following required
sampling will be stockpiled at the site and used, as needed, for the redevelopment of the
adjacent site (Project 09042) or for the eventual redevelopment of the subject property as stated
above.
4) Provide the source of fill, including: location, site history, nearby environmental concerns,
etc. Attach aerial photos, maps, historic Sanborn maps and a borrow source site history:
The source of the fill material will be determined by the successful winning bidder. A work plan
for sampling the proposed borrow pit(s) or Brownfield's sites will be submitted for NCDEQ review
and approval following award of the contract.
5) PRIOR TO ITS PLACEMENT AT THE BROWNFIELDS PROPERTY, provide a plan to analyze fill
soil to demonstrate that it meets acceptable standards applicable to the site and can be
approved for use atthe Brownfields property.
A sampling plan for the imported fill facility will be determined after the contract is awarded and
the EMP will be updated at that time to identify the source(s) and the sampling plan.
Representative samples from the borrow pit will be analyzed by the methods specified below.
6) Please check the applicable chemical analytes for fill soil samples. (Check all that apply):
® Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by EPA Method 8260
® Semi -volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) by EPA Method 8270
® Metals RCRA List (8) (arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium, mercury, lead,
selenium and silver): Specify Analytical Method Number(s):
Click Oi SON I1c1c w ciiLcl Lci.
❑ Pesticides: Specify Analytical Method Number(s):
Click or tap here to enter text
❑ PCBs: Specify Analytical Method Number(s):
Cli(- nr tan horn to ontor tov
® Other Constituents & Respective Analytical Method(s) (i.e. Hexavalent
Chromium, Herbicides, etc.):
Hexavalent Chromium by EPA Method 7199
7) The scope of work for import fill sampling may be provided below or in a Work Plan
submitted separately for DEQ review and approval. Attach specific location maps for in -situ
12
EMP Version 2, June 2018

borrow sites. If using a quarry, provide information on the type of material to be brought
onto the Brownfields Property.
If soil is imported from an off -site property or borrow pit that is not a known permitted quarry, a
sampling plan will be developed and submitted for DEQ review. DEQ approval of the sampling
plan and analytical results will be obtained prior to transporting import soil the Brownfields
property. The borrow pit samples will be analyzed in accordance with the methods specified in
item #6 above. However, if the borrow source has not be previously developed (virgin land) soil
samples will be collected for the laboratory analysis indicated above at a general rate of 1 per 500
to 1000 cu yds. If the borrow source property has been previous developed, the soil samples will
be collected for laboratory analysis indicated above at a general rate of 1 per 400 cu yds. Fill soil
will be considered suitable for use at the site if it does not contain compound concentrations
above DEQ IHSB PSRGs for Non -Residential Use or typical metals concentrations which are
consistent with background levels identified at the Site.
Part I.C. EXPORTED SOIL
NO SOIL MAY LEAVE THE BROWNFIELDS PROPERTY WITHOUT APPROVAL FROM THE
BROWNFIELDS PROGRAM. FAILURE TO OBTAIN APPROVAL MAY VIOLATE A BROWNFIELDS
AGREEMENT CAUSING A REOPENER OR JEOPARDIZING ELIGIBILITY IN THE PROGRAM,
ENDANGERING LIABILITY PROTECTIONS AND MAKING SAID ACTION POSSIBLY SUBJECT TO
ENFORCEMENT. JUSTIFICATIONS PROVIDED BELOW MUST BE APPROVED BY THE PROGRAM IN
WRITING PRIOR TO COMPLETING TRANSPORT ACTIVITIES. Please refer to Brownfields IR 15 for
additional details.
1) If export from a Brownfields Property is anticipated, please provide details regarding the
proposed export actions. Volume of exported soil, depths, location from which soil will
be excavated on site, related sampling results, etc. Provide a site map with locations of
export and sampling results included.
Export of native soil from the site, other than the referenced soil stockpile, is not proposed at
this time.
2) To what type of facility will the export Brownfields soil be sent?
❑ Subtitle D/Municipal Solid Waste Landfill (analytical program to be determined by
landfill)
❑ Permitted but Unlined Landfill (i.e. LCID, C&D, etc.) Analytical program to be
determined by the accepting Landfill;
❑ Landfarm or other treatment facility
® Use as fill at another suitable Brownfields Property — determination that a
site is suitable will require, at a minimum, that similar concentrations of the same or
similar contaminants already exist at both sites, use of impacted soil will not increase
the potential for risk to human health and the environment at the receiving Brownfields
property, and thata record of the acceptance of such soil from the property owner of
the receiving site is provided to Brownfields. Please provide additional details below.
13
EMP Version 2, June 2018

❑ Use as Beneficial Fill off -site at a non-Brownfields Property - Please provide
documentation of approval from the property owner for receipt of fill material. This will
also require approval by the DEQ Solid Waste Section. Additional information is
provided in IR 15. Please provide additional details below.
3) Additional Details: (if transfer of soil to another property is requested above, please provide
details related to the proposed plans).
Imported soils will be stockpiled onsite for later export to the adjoining Brownfields site # 09042-
05-090 or potentially used onsite during redevelopment.
Part 1.D. MANAGEMENT OF UTILITY TRENCHES
❑ Install liner between native impacted soils and base of utility trench before filling with clean fill
(Preferred)
® Last out, first in principle for impacted soils (if soil can safely be reused onsite and is not a
hazardous waste), i.e., impacted soils are placed back at approximately the depths they
were removed from such that impacted soil is not placed at a greater depth than the original
depth from which it was excavated.
❑ Evaluate whether necessary to install barriers in conduits to prevent soil vapor transport,
and/or degradation of conduit materials due to direct impact with contaminants?
❑ If yes, provide specifications on barrier materials:
Click or tap here to enter text.
❑ If no, include rationale here:
No excavation or site redevelopment plans are currently in place for the subject site, other than
stockpiling soil for construction on the adjoining property and possible future use onsite during
redevelopment.
Other comments regarding managing impacted soil in utility trenches:
PART 2. GROUNDWATER — Please fill out the information below.
1) What is the depth to groundwater at the Brownfields Property?
7-31 feet BGS
2) Is groundwater known to be contaminated by ❑onsite ®offsite ❑both or El unknown
sources? Describe source(s):
Ground water contamination at the site is likely form the adjacent Former Scott Aviation
property Brownfields Project #09042-05-090. Ground water contamination was confirmed during
the Phase II ESA and the Brownfields Assessment. A summary of ground water analytical results
14
EMP Version 2, June 2018

and maps are included in Appendices C & F, respectively.
3) What is the direction of groundwater flow at the Brownfields Property?
North to Northeast
4) Will groundwater likely be encountered during planned redevelopment activities?
❑Yes ®No
If yes, describe these activities:
Click c,] -tN 1._. _ ter text
Regardless of the answer; in the event that contaminated groundwater is encountered
during redevelopment activities (even if no is checked above), list activities for contingent
management of groundwater (e.g., dewateringof groundwater from excavations or
foundations, containerizing, offsite disposal, discharge to sanitary sewer, NPDES permit, or
sampling procedures).
Allow ground water to re -infiltrate for approximately 24 hours before dewatering from
excavations and foundations. Containerize the ground water, collect sample(s) and analyze by
the methods specified above for use in developing a profile for proper offsite disposal.
5) Are monitoring wells currently present on the Brownfields Property? ................. Eyes ❑ No
If yes, are any monitoring wells routinely monitored through DEQ or other
agencies?.................................................................................................................. ❑Yes ®No
6) Please check methods to be utilized in the management of known and previously
unidentified wells.
® Abandonment of site monitoring wells in accordance with all applicable regulations. It
is the Brownfields Program's intent to allow proper abandonment of well(s) as
specified in the Brownfields Agreement, except if required for active monitoring
through another section of DEQ or the EPA.
® Location of existing monitoring wells marked
® Existing monitoring wells protected from disturbance
❑ Newly identified monitoring wells will be marked and protected from further
disturbance until notification to DEQ Brownfields can be made and approval for
abandonment is given.
7) Please provide additional details as needed:
To the best of our knowledge the existing monitoring well network is not being sampled or
maintained by any other regulatory branch or agency.
Please note, disturbance of existing site monitoring wells without approval by DEQ is not
permissible. If monitoring wells are damaged and/or destroyed, DEQ may require that the PD
be responsible for replacement of the well.
15
EMP Version 2, June 2018

PART 3. SURFACE WATER -Please fill out the information below.
1) Is surface water present at the property? ❑ Yes ® No
2) Attach a map showing the location of surface water at the Brownfields Property.
3) Is surface water at the property known to be contaminated? ❑ Yes ® No
4) Will workers or the public be in contact with surface water during planned redevelopment
activities? ❑ Yes ® No
5) In the event that contaminated surface water is encountered during redevelopment
activities, or clean surface water enters open excavations, list activities for management of
such events (e.g. flooding, contaminated surface water run-off, stormwater impacts):
Prevent storm water runoff from entering the renovated areas by setting up barriers to divert
flow from disturbed soils. Allow ground water to re -infiltrate for approximately 24 hours before
dewatering from excavations and foundations. Containerize any surface water that comes in
contact with disturbed soils. Collect sample(s) of containerized surface water and analyze for
VOCs using EPA Method 8260 for use in developing a profile for proper offsite disposal.
PART 4. SEDIMENT — Please fill out the information below.
1) Are sediment sources present on the property? ❑ Yes ® No
2) If yes, is sediment at the property known to be contaminated: ❑ Yes ® No
3) Will workers or the public be in contact with sediment during planned redevelopment
activities? ❑ Yes ® No
4) Attach a map showing location of known contaminated sediment at the property.
5) In the event that contaminated sediment is encountered during redevelopment activities, list
activities for management of such events (stream bed disturbance):
No sediment or surface water is present on the Brownfields property.
PART 5. SOIL VAPOR — Please fill out the information below.
1) Do concentrations of volatile organic compounds at the Brownfields property exceed the
following vapor intrusion screening levels (current version) in the following media:
IHSB Residential Screening Levels:
Soil Vapor: ........... ❑ Yes ❑ No ® Unknown
Groundwater:..... El Yes ❑ No ® Unknown
IHSB Industrial/Commercial Screening Levels:
16
EMP Version 2, June 2018

Soil Vapor: ........... ❑ Yes ❑ No ® Unknown
Groundwater:..... El Yes ❑ No ® Unknown
2) Attach a map showing the locations of soil vapor contaminants that exceed site
screening levels.
3) If applicable, at what depth(s) is soil vapor known to be contaminated?
Unknown
4) Will workers encounter contaminated soil vapor during planned redevelopment activities?
❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown
5) In the event that contaminated soil vapor is encountered during redevelopment activities
(trenches, manways, basements or other subsurface work,) list activities for management
of such contact:
Redevelopment activities are not currently planned for the property. Currently, the Brownfields
property will only be used as an area to stockpile NCDEQ-approved soils to be used on the
adjacent Brownfields property (09042) or for future development of the subject site.
PART 6. SUB -SLAB SOIL VAPOR — Please fill out the information below if existing buildings or
foundations will be retained in the redevelopment.
1) Are sub -slab soil vapor data available for the Brownfields Property? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown
2) If data indicate that sub -slab soil vapor concentrations exceed screening levels, attach a map
showing the location of these exceedances.
3) At what depth(s) is sub -slab soil vapor known to be contaminated? ❑0-6 inches ❑Other, please
describe:
Unknown
4) Will workers encounter contaminated sub -slab soil vapor during planned redevelopment
activities? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown
5) In the event that contaminated soil vapor is encountered during redevelopment activities, list
activities for management of such contact
Redevelopment activities are not currently planned for the property. Currently, the Brownfields
property will only be used as an area to stockpile NCDEQ-approved soils to be used on the
adjacent Brownfields property (09042) or for future development of the subject site.
PART 7. INDOOR AIR — Please fill out the information below.
1) Are indoor air data available for the Brownfields Property? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown
2) Attach a map showing the location(s) where indoor air contaminants exceed site screening levels.
17
EMP Version 2, June 2018

3) If the structures where indoor air has been documented to exceed risk -based screening levels will
not be demolished as part of redevelopment activities, will workers encounter contaminated
indoor air during planned redevelopment activities? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
4) In the event that contaminated indoor air is encountered during redevelopment activities, list
activities for management of such contact:
Redevelopment activities are not currently planned for the property. Currently, the Brownfields
property will only be used as an area to stockpile NCDEQ-approved soils to be used on the adjacent
Brownfields property (09042) or for future development of the subject site.
VAPOR INTRUSION MITIGATION SYSTEM — Please fill out the information below.
Is a vapor intrusion mitigation system (VIMS) proposed for this Brownfields Property?
❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown
If yes, ❑ VIMS Plan Attached or ❑ VIMS Plan to be submitted separately
If submitted separately provide date:
UIcK or tap nere to enter tex
VIMS Plan shall be signed and sealed by a NC Professional Engineer
If no, please provide a brief rationale as to why no vapor mitigation plan is warranted:
Concentrations of contaminants of concern in previously collected ground water samples at the
site did not exceed the Ground Water Non -Residential VISLs.
CONTINGENCY PLAN —encountering unknown tanks, drums, or other waste materials
In this section please provide actions that will be taken to identify or manage unknown
potential new sources of contamination. During redevelopment activities, it is not uncommon
that unknown tanks, drums, fuel lines, landfills, orother waste materials are encountered.
Notification to DEQ Brownfields Project Manager, UST Section, Fire Department, and/or other
officials, as necessary and appropriate, is required when new potential source(s) of
contamination are discovered. These Notification Requirements were outlined on Page 1 of this
EMP.
Should potentially impacted materials be identified that are inconsistent with known site
impacts, the DEQ Brownfields Project Manager will be notified and a sampling plan will be
prepared based on the EMP requirements and site -specific factors. Samples will generally be
collected to document the location of the potential impacts.
18
EMP Version 2, June 2018

Check the following chemical analysis that are to be conducted on newly identified releases:
® Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by EPA Method 8260
® Semi -volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) by EPA Method 8270
® Metals RCRA List (8) (arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium, mercury, lead, selenium and
silver)
_iici< or Lap nere to enter LexL
❑ Pesticides: Specify Analytical Method Number(s):
p here r- +.
❑ PCBs: Specify Analytical Method Number(s):
Click or tap here to enter text
❑ Other Constituents & Analytical Method(s) (i.e. Hexavalent Chromium, Herbicides, etc.)
Please note, if field observations indicate the need for additional analyses, they should
be conducted, even if not listed here.
Mick or tap here to enter text
Please provide details on the proposed methods of managing the following commonly
encountered issues during redevelopment of Brownfields Properties.
Encountering items or issues of environmental concern during the development of the site will be
reported to the NCDEQ Brownfields Project Manager.
Underground Storage Tanks:
Should a previously unreported underground storage tank (UST) be identified during site
development activities, excavation activities in the vicinity of the UST will be put on hold and the
discovery will be reported to the environmental consultant, who will assess the situation and report
to the DEQ within 48 hours of discovery. The tank will be inspected to determine if any product
remains in the tank.
Any UST/product evaluation, removal and disposal will be conducted through the Brownfields
Section.
Residual product/ water in the UST will be evaluated prior to disposal. One representative sample
will be collected from any residual fluid in the UST. The sample will be analyzed for VOCs and SVOCs
by SW-846 Methods 8260 and 8270 and RCRA Metals. Following receipt of then laboratory
analytical data, a Disposal Plan will be submitted to the Brownfields Project Manager for approval
prior to proper disposal.
The UST will be emptied of all residual fluids prior to removal. The UST will be transported to a
recycling facility or landfill for disposal. A disposal manifest will be provided to the Brownfields
Project Manager.
19
EMP Version 2, June 2018

The preferred method of UST closure is removal. However, if the UST cannot be removed safely
then a Closure -in -Place Plan will be submitted to the Brownfields Project manager for review and
approval.
Soil samples will be collected either beneath the UST or adjacent to the UST, depending on closure
method. Collected soil samples will be analyzed aby SW-846 Methods 8260 and 82780 and for RCRA
metals.
Sub -Grade Feature/Pit:
If a subsurface feature, pit or impoundment is discovered during site development the feature will
be removed. Excavation and other construction activities in the vicinity of the feature will be placed
on hold and the discovery will be reported to the environmental consultant. The consultant will
assess the situation and report to the DEQ within 48 hours of discovery.
The subsurface feature will be removed in accordance with a pre -approved plan from the
Brownfields Program. The removal would be necessary for any future site development for one or
more of the following reasons: proper load bearing capability, structural fill and compaction
requirements, building construction/footer design, and potential vapor intrusion mitigation system.
Any contents of the feature will be evaluated, analyzed, and disposed of at a licensed offsite facility
in accordance with regulatory requirements and DEQ approval. Any residual soils and/or liquids in
the pit would be sampled for waste characterization. A pit sampling plan that will also include post -
pit removal soil sampling, will be submitted in advance of sampling for review and approval by the
Brownfields Project Manager. One representative composite sample from each media in the pit
would be analyzed for SVOCs by SW-846 Method 8270 and RCRA metals. An aliquot of each
composite sample will be held for analysis of hexavalent chromium, if warranted, based upon the
RCRA metals results. In addition, one grab sample from each media will be collected and analyzed
for VOCs by SW-846 Method 8260. Following receipt of the laboratory analytical report. A disposal
plan based upon the waste characterization, including acceptance approval form the appropriate
disposal facility(ies) will be prepared and submitted to the Brownfields Project Manager for review
and approval prior to disposal of the residual media.
During waste characterization activities within the perimeter of the pit would cease. Only those
activities necessary to stabilize any residual media to prevent run-off or leakage will be conducted.
If necessary, the material will be place into drums or roll -off containers, prior to disposal. Ideally,
any residual media, once characterized would be loaded directly from the pit and transported off
site to the appropriate disposal facility.
Following removal of the waste media, any remaining man-made (i.e. concrete, steel) structure will
be power -washed and the rinsate will be collected and properly disposed. The underlying soils will
20
EMP Version 2, June 2018

be sampled as part of the aforementioned sampling plan. One or more composite and grab samples
will be collected and analyzed for VOCs by SW-846 Method 8260, for SVOCs by SW-846 Method
8270 and for RCRA metals. An aliquot of each composite sample will be held for analysis of
hexavalent chromium, if warranted, based on the RCRA metals results.
If the pit is constructed of earthen material then the base and the sidewalls of the pit will be
sampled. Following receipt of the laboratory analytical results, any soils not suitable for repurposing
on the site will be identified and transported off -site for disposal. The method of disposal will be
proposed in an export soil sampling plan and will be submitted to the Brownfields Project Manager
for review and approval prior to disposal activities.
During demolition, the breathing zone will be monitored using a PID/FID. If elevated readings are
noted, then site activities will cease until levels have dissipated.
Buried Waste Material:
Should buried waste material be discovered during excavation activities, the contractor will
immediately notify the environmental consultant. The consultant will assess the situation and
report to the DEQ within 48 hours of discovery. The contents of the waste material will tank will be
evaluated, analyzed, and disposed of at a licensed offsite facility in accordance with regulatory
requirements and DEQ approval. The waste material will be removed in accordance with applicable
NCDEQ Solid Waste or IHSB regulation, surrounding soil and soil at the base of the feature will be
screened with a photoionization detector (PID) and flame ionization detector (FID), the breathing
zone will be monitored using a PID/FID, and confirmatory sampling and/or remedial activities will be
conducted to the satisfaction of DEQ, which will include all applicable sampling locations including
the base of the waste material.
Re -Use of Impacted Soils On -Site:
Coordinate with the NCDEQ regarding required sampling and placement.
If unknown, impacted soil is identified on -site, management on -site can be considered after the
project team provides the necessary information, outlined in Part 1.A. Item 11, for Brownfields
Project Manager approval prior to final placement on -site.
If other potential contingency plans are pertinent, please provide other details or scenarios as
needed below:
The environmental consultant will be notified in the event that other indications of potential
environmental concern or impact are identified at the site and report discoveries to DEQ within 48-
hours.
POST -REDEVELOPMENT REPORTING
21
EMP Version 2, June 2018

® Check this box to acknowledge that a Redevelopment Summary Report will be required for the
project. If the project duration is longer than one year, an annual update is required and will be
due by January 31 of each year, or 30 days after each one-year anniversary of the effective date of
this EMP (as agreed upon with the Project Manager). These reports will be required for as long as
physical redevelopment of the Brownfields Property continues, except that the final
Redevelopment Summary Report will be submitted within 90 days after completion of
redevelopment. Based on the estimated construction schedule, the first Redevelopment Summary
Report is anticipated to be submitted on 5/31/2021
The Redevelopment Summary Report shall include environment -related activities since the last
report, with a summary and drawings, that describes:
1. actions taken on the Brownfields Property;
2. soil grading and cut and fill actions;
3. methodology(ies) employed for field screening, sampling and laboratory analysis of
environmental media;
4. stockpiling, containerizing, decontaminating, treating, handling, laboratory analysis and
ultimate disposition of any soil, groundwater or other materials suspected or confirmed
to be contaminated with regulated substances; and
5. removal of any contaminated soil, water or other contaminated materials (for example,
concrete, demolition debris) from the Brownfields Property (copies of all legally required
manifests shall be included).
X❑ Check box to acknowledge consent to provide a NC licensed P.G. or P.E. sealed, Redevelopment
Summary Report in compliance with the site's Brownfields Agreement.
22
EMP Version 2, June 2018

APPROVAL SIGNATURES
Brownfields Project Number: 24029-20-090
Brownfields Project Name: 694 West Crowell Street Property
�16.ZA Z')
Prospective Developer: City of Monroe Date Click car tap to enter a date,
Printed Name/Title/Company: E.L. Faison
AW)k .1
Consultant: Resolve Environmental Services, PLLC Date 9/16/2020
Printed Name/Title/Company: Laura Minor (Ops. Mgr.)
' 10/1 /2020
Brownfields Project Manager:Carolyn Minnich Date Click or tap to enter a ciao.
22
EMP Version 2, June 2018

Figure 1
NCBP Diagram for Temporary
Containment of Impacted or Potentially
Impacted Soil
Cross -Section View
Top Plastic Cover Sheeting: Underliner: 1 layer, minimum of 10
(1 Layer, minimum: 10 mil thick) mil thick plastic
Berm
(Straw bales, Weight
composted earth, etc.) (If plastic
cover used)
Land Contaminated Soils
Surface
\ z
Straw Bale Berm
Map View
' ■ ❑ Ji. . ................ ___ ................................ . ... Weight
O^
■� Contaminated Soils
.....................................................
000 o Plastic
\ Sheeting
Note: Adapted from NC DEQ UST Section "Guidelines for Ex Situ Petroleum Contaminated Soil Remediation" dated December, 1, 2013
24
EMP Version 2, June 2018

m
.22 5'.'l 524
4.
I
WF'
Z
"4
A''�0
3 1�2 a 2� 5 - 00 me
500
09232254

TABLE 2
SUMMARY OF GROUND WATER SAMPLE ANALYTICAL RESULTS
694 W. CROWELL STREET
MONROE, NORTH CAROLINA
Date: 2/10/2020
Analytical Method 4
SW846 8260D
Contaminant of Concern 4
0
0
Date
Well ID
Collected
(mm/dd/yy)
F,
2L Standard (µg/1)
0.7
GCL (µg/1)
700
TMW-1
01/29/20
<0.22
TMW-2
01/30/20
<0.22
TMW-3
01/30/20
<0.22
TMW-BACKGROUND
01/30/20
NR
TMW-5
01/30/20
1.8
TMW-6
01/29/20
<0.22
Notes:
• Results reported in micrograms per liter W/1).
• < : Less than the method detection limit specified in the laboratory report.
• 2L Standard specified in T 15A NCAC 2L.0202.
• GCL: Gross contamination level.
• Concentrations in bold face type exceeded the 2L Standard.
• NR: Analysis not requested.
Page 1 of 1

LEGEND
TREES
- -- - --
- SUBJECT PROPERTY
BOUNDARY LINE
-------
ADJACENT PROPERTY
BOUNDARY LINE
UTILITY/POWER POLE
LIGHT POLE
FOC
UNDERGROUND FIBER OPTIC CABLE LINE
SS
UNDERGROUND SANITARY SEWER LINE
W
UNDERGROUND WATER LINE
E
UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC LINE
SOIL SAMPLE LOCATION
[1.5]
DEPTH OF SOIL SAMPLE (IN FEET)
(0.0)
PID READING (IN ppm)
N/A
NOT APPLICABLE
Note:
1. This Site Map is based on data from the Union County,
NC GIS office.
2. This Site was not professionally surveyed; all utilities,
locations, and distances are approximate.
3. Composite samples COMP-1 comprised of SB-1 and
SB-1A samples; COMP-2 comprised of SIB-1 and SB-2A
samples, and so forth.
4. MW-1-5', MW-2-10' and MW-3-10' soil samples
collected on July 13, 2020. All remaining soil samples
were collected and/or composited in the field on July 12,
2020.
5. Only concentrations of compounds that exceeded the
NCDEQ PSRG (residential) are shown on Figure 4. Refer
to Table 1 and laboratory analytical reports for additional
information.
ARSENIC
SOIL COMPOSITE CONCENTRATION
SAMPLE SAMPLE (in
ID ID mq/kq)
SB-1
COMP-1
9.1
SB-1A
SB-2
COMP-2
5.0
SB-2A
SB-3
COMP-3
8.5
SB-3A
SB-4
COMP-4
11.5
SB-4A
SB-5
COMP-5
7.9
SB-5A
MW-1-5'
N/A
3.7
MW-2-10'
N/A
66.0
MW-3-10
N/A
4.8
GRID 1 GRID 2 i
I
I
1 _ I
I
SB-1
[1.5]
1 (0.0) I
1 I
1
1
[10.0]
(N/A) I
+MW-3-10'
1
1 El I
I
---,FWAfFRWAVE
ASr LOCA770VqL
I
I
I
1 Building I
1 Footprint SB-1A
20
1
�
1
DF-
------------
CO
I
GRID 4
2
D
1
17-
17-
1
6
+ [2.0]
CO
(0.0)
m
1MW-2-10'
1
[10.0]
(N/A)
c
Li
1
1
�m
1
[2.0]
(0.0)
+SB-4A
RESOLVE ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, PLLC
500 DEVONPORT DRIVE
MATTHEWS NC 28104
SB-2
+[1.5]
(0.2)
[ ] [2.0]
(0.0) (0 0)
+SB-2A
I
- - - - - - - - - - -
roc GRID 5
I
I
I SB-5
[2.0]
(0.0)
I Off,
I �GRAVE�
I
I
I
I
I SB-5A
[2.0]
(0.0)
I
I
I
W CROWELL STREET
GRID 3
1
1
I
SB-3 1
[2.0] 1
(0.0)
1
I
1
1
I<
[5.0] SS
-- - MWN1 A5' FOC , SB-3
U
O
Li
1
1
1
09232257
1
1
I
1
1
U -
0
Li
CFOC-
��Ass�
0 25 50 100
( IN FEET )
1 inch = 50 ft
W
ell
[2.0]
(0.0)
SOIL SAMPLE QUALITY MAP
694 W. Crowell Street 694 W. Crowell Street
Project ID: 24029-20-090 Monroe, Union County, INC
Date: 07/25/2020I Drawn by: DTH I Figure:
4

TABLE 1
SUMMARY OF SOIL SAMPLE ANALYTICAL RESULTS
694 W CROWELL STREET
PROJECT ID: 24029-20-090
Date: 07/24/20
Analytical Method 4
SW846 8260D
SW846 8270E
SW846 6010D
SW846 7471B
EPA Method
305011, 3051A
Contaminant of Concern
d
�
y
�
a
M
•vim,
sir
L
•p
�
�WC.I
a
Date Collected
Sample Depth
N
o
U
Sam le ID
p
(mm/dd/yy)
(feet)
o
b
NCDEQ Preliminary Soil Remediation Goals
1.2
61,000
27,000
1.1
0.68
15,000
11
NE
400
Residential (mg/kg)
NCDEQ Preliminary Soil Remediation Goals
5.1
670,000
190,000
21
3.0
220,000
460
NE
800
Industrial/Commercial (mg/kg)
EPA Regional Screening Levels Protection of
0.0023
2.9
1.2
0.98
0.0015
82
0.033
180,000
14
Groundwater (mg/kg)
S13-1
07/12/2020
1.5
<0.0016
<0.13
<0.0097
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
S13-2
07/12/2020
1.5
<0.0014
0.171 J
0.0108 J
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
S13-3
07/12/2020
2
0.0024 J
0.289 J
0.0136 J
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
S13-4
07/12/2020
2
<0.0017
<0.14
<0.010
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
S13-5
07/12/2020
2
<0.0014
0.149 J
0.0161 J
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
COMP-1
07/12/2020
---
NR
NR
NR
<0.025
9.1
69.5
<0.051
43.1
26.9
COMP-2
07/12/2020
---
NR
NR
NR
0.0968 J
5.0
<38
<0.041
19.4
25.8
COMP-3
07/12/2020
NR
NR
NR
0.666
8.5
154
0.35
34.3
280
COMP-4
07/12/2020
NR
NR
NR
<0.025
11.5
<59
<0.046
39.4
12.6
COMP-5
07/12/2020
NR
NR
NR
0.0778 J
7.9
<42
<0.048
29.2
21.5
SOIL DUP
07/12/2020
--
<0.0012
<0.10
<0.0074
<0.025
6.4
<95
0.049
37.0
13.9
MW-1-5'
07/13/2020
5
<0.0015
<0.13
<0.0092
<0.026
3.7
<41
<0.050
26.1
11.1
MW-2-10'
07/13/2020
10
<0.0019
<0.15
<0.011
<0.026
66.0
<53
<0.051
49.1
19.6
MW-3-10'
07/13/2020
10
<0.0013
<0.11
<0.0077
<0.024
4.8
<55
<0.046
30.0
12.4
Notes:
• Results reported in mg/kg (milligrams per kilograms)
• NCDEQ Preliminary Soil Remediation Goals (Residential & Industrial/Commercial) published July 2020.
• EPA Regional Screening Levels (TR=IE-06, HQ=1) published May 2020 (corrected).
• < : Less than the method detection limit specified in the laboratory report
• Concentrations in bold & italics face type exceeded the NCDEQ Residential PSRG.
• Concentrations in bold face type exceeded the EPA Regional Screening Level.
• NE: Not Established
• J: Estimated value.

LEGEND
�����✓ww� TREES
�atAss�
N
— -- — -- — SUBJECT PROPERTY
1
BOUNDARY LINE
1
------- ADJACENT PROPERTY
1
I
BOUNDARY LINE
I
UTILITY/POWER POLE
I
1
LIGHT POLE
1
O TYPE II MONITORING WELL
1
FOC UNDERGROUND FIBER OPTIC CABLE LINE
1
I
SS UNDERGROUND SANITARY SEWER LINE
I
1
W UNDERGROUND WATER LINE
1
E UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC LINE
1 �GRASS�
(79.42) GROUND WATER ELEVATION (IN FEET)
1
�mEESa
86.00 — _ _
— POTENTIOMETRIC SURFACE CONTOUR LINE
I (79.42)
78.00
O MW-3
80.00
1
\
I
\
76.00
1
Note:
1. This Site Map is based on data from the Union County,
NC GIS
82.00
\
1
office.
Building \
\
\
2. This Site was not professionally surveyed; all utilities,
1 T-s<tprint
I
locations, and distances are approximate.
I
\
SS (75.97)
\
MW-1
1
1
\
FOC
FOC
84.00
GRASSa
_
\
\
0
D
�
1
��
1
86.00
I
I
m
1 0 MW-2
M
1 (87.04)
I
�GRAVE%;,
I
09232257
I
1 �Gj
1
1
1
I 'Z:!GR
I
I
1
1 0
1
I
u-
1
U
O
V_
�GRASS-�,
CFOC-
FOC
——
—— —E
—
-EE
--
ss W
CROWELL
STREET
ss
w
w
RESOLVE ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES,
PLLC
0
25 50
100
POTENTIOMETRIC
SURFACE MAP
500 D EVON P 0 R T DRIVE
694 W. Crowell Street
694 W. Crowell Street
MATTHEWS NC 28104
IN FEET )
Project ID: 24029-20-090
Monroe, Union County, NC
Date:
07/25/2020
Drawn by:
DTH
I Figure: 5
1 inch = 50 ft

TABLE 2
WELL CONSTRUCTION AND GAUGING INFORMATION
694 W. CROWELL STREET
PROJECT ID: 24029-20-090
Date: 7/22/2020
Depth to
Date Water
Well
Screened
Top of
Free
Date
Bottom
Water from
Groundwater
Level
Casing
Interval
Casing
Product
Well ID
Installed
Measured
Depth
(x to X ft.
of Well
Elevation
Top of
Thickness
Elevation
Comments
(mm/dd/yy)
(ft. BGS)
Casi) g
(ft.)
(mm/dd/yy)
(ft. BGS)
BGS)
(ft)
(ft.)
MW-1
7/13/2020
7/15/2020
18
18-38
38
100.00
24.03
---
75.97
MW-2
7/13/2020
7/15/2020
18
18-38
38
105.16
18.12
---
87.04
MW-3
7/13/2020
7/15/2020
18
18-38
38
104.21
24.79
---
79.42
Notes:
• ft BGS : feet below ground surface.

LEGEND
�����✓ww� TREES
�atAss�
N
— -- — -- — SUBJECT PROPERTY
1
BOUNDARY LINE
1
------- ADJACENT PROPERTY
1
I
BOUNDARY LINE
UTILITY/POWER POLE
,
LIGHT POLE
1
O TYPE II MONITORING WELL
1
I
FOC UNDERGROUND FIBER OPTIC CABLE LINE
SS UNDERGROUND SANITARY SEWER LINE
I
1
W UNDERGROUND WATER LINE
1
E UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC LINE
�GRASS�
4.2 METHYL CHLORIDE
'1REES a
2.5 TETRACHLOROETHENE
CONCENTRATIONS REPORTS IN ug/L
I
0 MW-3
1 EI
I
Note:
1. This Site Map is based on data from the Union County,
NC GIS office.
Building
2. This Site was not professionally surveyed; all utilities,
Footprint
I
locations, and distances are approximate.
4.2
3. Only concentrations of compounds that exceeded the 2L
I
SS
�SS
Standard are reported on Figure 6. Refer to Table 3
MW-1
and the laboratory analytical reports for additional
FOC
FOC
information.
1
�GRASSa
(�
�0
Q
�.
D
r
I
m
1 0 MW-2
m
�00
IO
GRAVE'
L
I
1
1
�Gj
�
1
I 'Z:rG
I
1
'
UU
,
u-
1
U
O
V_
I
�GRASS-�,
rFO
FOC
I
- ---�-E
-- --
-E
-
-- E
--
SS
W
CROWELL STREET
SS
W
W
RESOLVE ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, PLLC
0 25 50
100
GROUND WATER
QUALITY MAP
500 D EVON P 0 R T DRIVE
694 W. Crowell Street
694 W. Crowell Street
MATTHEWS NC 28104
IN FEET )
Project ID: 24029-20-090
Monroe, Union County, NC
Date:
07/25/2020
Drawn by:
DTH
I Figure: 6
1 inch = 50 ft

TABLE 3
SUMMARY OF GROUND WATER SAMPLE ANALYTICAL RESULTS
694 W CROWELL STREET
PROJECT ID: 24029-20-090
Date: 07/23/20
Analytical Method
SW846 8260D
SW846 8270E
SW846 6010D
Contaminant of Concern 4
�
y
7
Date
F
c
s
Well ID
Collected
U
F
A
(mm/dd/yy)
2L Standard
(µg/1)
600
3
0.7
700
15
EPA MCL (µg/1)
1,000
NE
5
NE
15
MW-1
07/15/20
<0.30
4.2
2.5
2.3 J
8.1
MW-2
07/15/20
<0.30
<0.50
<0.22
2.4 J
<5.0
MW-3
07/15/20
<0.30
<0.50
<0.22
NR
<5.0
MW-3
07/17/20
NR
NR
NR
1.4 J
NR
GW DUPLICATE
07/15/20
<0.30
<0.50
<0.22
3.3 J
<5.0
GW DUPLICATE
07/17/20
NR
NR
NR
1.4 J
NR
TRIP BLANK
07/15/20
0.38 J
<0.50
<0.22
NR
NR
Notes:
• Results reported in micrograms per liter (µg/1).
• < : Less than the method detection limit specified in the laboratory report.
• 2L Standard specified in T15A NCAC 2L.0202.
• NE: Not Established
• NR: Analysis not requested.
• Concentrations in bold face type exceeded the 2L standard.
Page 1 of 1