06016_Radiator Specialty_EMP_final

DocuSign Envelope ID: E6518943-A4B0-498F-A5EB-83693863D85B
NORTH CAROLINA BROWNFIELDS PROGRAM ENVIRONMENTAL
MANAGEMENT PLAN
This form is to be used to prepare an Environmental Management Plan (EMP) for projects inthe
North Carolina Brownfields Program at the direction of a Brownfields project manager.
The EMP is a typical requirement of a Brownfields Agreement (BFA). Its purpose is to clarify
actions to be taken during the demolition and construction at Brownfields properties in an
effort to avoid delays in the event of the discovery of new contamination sources or other
environmental conditions. The EMP provides a means to document redevelopment plans and
environmental data for each applicable environmental medium to inform regulatory -compliant
decision -making at the site. As much detail as possible should be included in the EMP, including
contingency planning for unknowns. Consult your project manager if you have questions.
Prospective Developers and/or their consultants must complete and submit this form and all
pertinent attachments, see checklist below, to their Brownfields project manager prior to any
earthmoving or other development -related activities that have the potential to disturb soil at
the Brownfields Property, including demolition. For the resultant EMP to be valid for use, it
must be completed, reviewed by the program, signed by all parties working on the project, and
approved by the Brownfields project manager. Failure to comply with the requirements of the
EMP could jeopardize project eligibility, or in the event of a completed agreement, be cause for
a reopener
So that the EMP provides value in protecting brownfields eligibility and public health, the
preparer shall ensure that the following steps have been completed prior to submitting the
EMP for review. Any EMP prepared without completing these steps is premature.
0 Site sampling and assessment that meets Brownfields' objectives is complete and
has been reviewed and approved by the Brownfields Project Manager.
0 Specific redevelopment plans, even if conceptual, have been developed for the
project, submitted and reviewed by the Brownfields Project Manager.
EMP Version 2, June 2018

DocuSign Envelope ID: E6518943-A4B0-498F-A5EB-83693863D85B
Please submit, along with the completed EMP form, the following attachments, as relevant and
applicable to the proposed redevelopment:
❑X A set of redevelopment plans, including architectural/engineering plans, if
available; if not conceptual plans may suffice if updated when detailed plans are
drafted.
❑ A figure overlaying redevelopment plans on a map of the extent of contamination
for each media.
❑ Site grading plans that include a cut and fill analysis.
❑ A figure showing the proposed location and depth of impacted soil that would
remain on site after construction grading.
0 Any necessary permits for redevelopment (i.e. demolition, etc.).
Section 404/Nationwide 27 (USACE) - DWR#17-1055
Section 401/Nationwide (NC DEQ) - SAW-2017-01763
Sediment and Erosion Control (NCDEQ/NCDEMLR/DLR) - Permit #1985
Floodplain Development Permit (Mecklenburg County, NC) — Pending
Approval
❑ A detailed construction schedule that includes timing and phases of construction.
0 Tabulated data summaries for each impacted media (i.e. soil, groundwater, soil
gas, etc.) applicable to the proposed redevelopment.
❑ Figures with the sampling locations and contamination extents for each impacted
media applicable to the proposed redevelopment.
❑ A full final grade sampling and analysis plan, if the redevelopment plan is final.
❑ If known, information about each proposed potential borrow soil source, such as
aerial photos, historic site maps, historic Sanborn maps, a site history, necessary for
brownfields approval.
❑ Information and analytical data, if required, for quarries, or other borrow sources,
detailing the type of material proposed for importation to the Brownfields Property.
❑ A work plan for the sampling an analysis of soil to be brought onto the Brownfields
Property. Refer to Issue Resolution 15 in Brownfields Program Guidelines.
❑ A map of the Brownfields Property showing the location of soils proposed for
EMP Version 2, June 2018

DocuSign Envelope ID: E6518943-A4B0-498F-A5EB-83693863D85B
export and sampling data from those areas.
❑ If a Vapor Mitigation System is required by the Brownfields Program, the Vapor
Intrusion Mitigation System (VIMS) plan will be signed and sealed by a NC
Professional Engineer. The VIMS Plan may also be submitted under separate cover.
GENERAL INFORMATION
Date: April 14, 2020 Revision Date (if applicable):
Brownfields Assigned Project Name: Former Radiator Specialty Site
Brownfields Project Number: 06016-02-060
Brownfields Property Address: 2045 and 2145 Suttle Avenue, Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, North
Carolina (formerly 1900 and 2016 Wilkinson Boulevard and 2000, 2001, and 2120 Suttle Avenue).
Brownfields Property Area (acres): 0.43 acres of the site; the Historic Stewart Creek Enhancement
Project Phase III will be mostly confined within the designated storm water easement boundaries along
Stewart Creek, as noted on the restoration plans.
Is Brownfields Property subject to RCRA Permit? ....................... El Yes © No
If yes, enter Permit No.: Not Applicable
Is Brownfields Property subject to a Solid Waste Permit? .......... ❑ Yes © No
If yes, enter Permit No.: Not Applicable
COMMUNICATIONS
A copy of this EMP shall be distributed to all the parties below as well as any contractors or site
workers that may be exposed to site vapors, soil, groundwater, and/or surface water. Additionally, a
copy of the EMP shall be maintained at the Brownfields Property during redevelopment activities.
NOTE, THE EMP DOES NOT TAKE THE PLACE OF A SITE -SPECIFIC HEALTH AND SAFETY PLAN.
Prospective Developer (PD): Mecklenburg County
Contact Person: Stephanie Roberts
Phone Numbers: Office: [phone] Mobile: [phone]
Email: Stephanie.Roberts@ mecklenburgcountync.gov
Contractor forPD: Kimley-Horn
Contact Person: Mr. William Wilhelm
Phone Numbers: Office: [phone] Mobile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Environmental Consultant: Terracon Consultants, Inc.
EMP Version 2, June 2018

DocuSign Envelope ID: E6518943-A4B0-498F-A5EB-83693863D85B
Contact Person: Mr. Christopher Corbitt
Phone Numbers: Office: [phone] Mobile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Brownfields Program Project Manager: Ms. Joselyn Harriger, BPMU
Phone Numbers: Office: [phone] Mobile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Other DEQ Program Contacts (if applicable, i.e., UST Section, Inactive Hazardous Site Branch,
Hazardous Waste, Solid Waste):
Phone Numbers: Office Mobile:
Email:
NOTIFICATIONS TO THE BROWNFIELDS PROGRAM
Written advance Notification Times to Brownfields Project Manager: Check each box to accept
minimum advance notice periods (in calendar days) for each type of onsitetask:
On -site assessment or remedial activities.................................................................. 10 days prior ❑X
Construction or grading start....................................................................................... 10 days prior ❑X
Discovery of stained soil, odors, USTs, buried drums or waste, landfill, or other signs of previously
unknown contamination.............................................................................................. Within 48 hours ❑X
Implementation of emergency actions (e.g. dewatering, flood or soil erosion control measures in area of
contamination, ventilation of work zones)............................................................... Within 48 hours ❑X
Installation of mitigation systems.............................................................................. 10 days prior ❑X
Other notifications as required by local, state or federal agencies to implement redevelopment activities
(as applicable)............................................................................................................... Within 30 days ❑X
REDEVELOPMENT PLANS
1) Type of Redevelopment (check all that apply):
❑ Residential ❑ Recreational ❑ Institutional ❑ Commercial ❑ Office ❑ Retail ❑ Industrial
® Other, specify: Planned restoration of this segment of Stewart Creek involves a stream
restoration project by Mecklenburg County. The project will include bank grading and
placement of rip rap.
2) Check the following activities that will be conducted prior to commencing earth -moving
activities at the site:
® Review of historic maps (Sanborn Maps, facility maps)
❑ Conducting geophysical surveys to evaluate the location of suspect UST, fuel lines, utility
EMP Vern.— June 2018

DocuSign Envelope ID: E6518943-A4B0-498F-A5EB-83693863D85B
lines, etc.
❑ Interviews with employees/former employees/facility managers/neighbors
3) Summary of Redevelopment Plans (MANDATORY: attach detailed plans or conceptual plans, if
detailed plans are not available. EMP review without such information would be premature).
Provide brief summary of redevelopment plans, including demolition, removal of building
slabs/pavement, grading plans and planned construction of new structures:
This EMP only addresses the planned stream restoration activities associated with the Historic
Stewart Creek Enhancement Project Phase III that encroach along the Former Radiator Specialty
Brownfields site. The Historic Stewart Creek Enhancement Project Phase III does not include any
previous redevelopment plans for the site, demolition of on -site buildings or construction of new
buildings. Mecklenburg County (PD) plans to conduct stream restoration activities along Stewart
Creek within the designated storm water easement, depicted on the conceptual plans. These
activities include stream bank grading and placement of rip rap boulders to control flow within
the stream boundaries. Presently, development plans have not been finalized. Conceptual
Development Plans of the Historic Stewart Creek Enhancement Project Phase III are attached.
4) Do plans include demolition of structure(s)?
❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown
❑ If yes, please check here to confirm that demolition will be conducted in accordance with
applicable legal requirements, including without limitation those related to lead and asbestos
abatement that are administered by the Health Hazards Control Unit within the Division of
Public Health of the North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services. If available,
please provide a copy of your demolition permit.
5) Are sediment and erosion control measures required by federal, state, or local regulations?
® Yes ❑ No ❑ unknown
® If yes, please check here to confirm that demolition will be conducted in accordance with
applicable legal requirements. If soil disturbance is necessary to install sediment and erosion
control measures, they may not begin until this EMP is approved.
6) Which category of risk -based screening level is used or is anticipated to be specified in the
Brownfields Agreement? Note: If children frequent the property, residential screening levels
shall be cited in the Brownfields Agreement for comparison purposes.
❑ Residential ® Non -Residential or Industrial/Commercial
7) Schedule for Redevelopment (attach construction schedule):
a. Construction start date: To be determined.
b. Anticipated duration (specify activities during each phase):
Summer 2020; General Contractor bidding activities are planned for April 2020.
c. Additional phases planned? ❑ Yes ® No
If yes, specify the start date and/or activities if known:
Start Date:
Planned Activity:
EMP Version 2, June 2018

DocuSign Envelope ID: E6518943-A4B0-498F-A5EB-83693863D85B
Start Date:
Planned Activity:
Start Date:
Planned Activity:
d. Provide the planned date of occupancy for new buildings: Not Applicable
CONTAMINATED MEDIA
1) Contaminated Media on the Brownfields Property
Part 1. Soil.........................................................................
© Yes
❑ No
❑ Suspected
Part 2. Groundwater.......................................................
© Yes
❑ No
❑ Suspected
Part 3. Surface Water ......................................................
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Suspected
Part 4. Sediment..............................................................
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Suspected
Part 5. Soil Vapor.............................................................
® Yes
❑ No
❑ Suspected
Part 6. Sub -Slab Soil Vapor .............................................
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Suspected
Part 7. Indoor Air.............................................................
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Suspected
2) For the Area of Proposed Redevelopment on the Brownfields Property, attach tabulated data
summaries for each impacted media and figure(s) with sample locations.
PART 1. Soil — Please fill out the information below, using detailed site plans, if available, or estimate
using known areas of contaminated soil and conceptual redevelopment plan. Provide a figure
overlaying new construction onto figure showing contaminated soil and groundwater locations.
1) Known or suspected contaminants in soil (list general groups of contaminants):
Soil samples have not been collected from areas of the site within the planned stream restoration
project related to the Brownfields assessment; however, multiple soil samples have been
collected in areas of the Former Radiator Specialty site located up -gradient and near the
boundaries of Stewart Creek. Soil analytical results are included as Table 1 (Table 9 — Building 9
and Eastern Drum Storage Exceedances, extracted from Results of Site Assessment Activities, Hart
& Hickman, dated August 19, 2002).
During the initial assessment of the site in 2002, approximately 140 soil samples were obtained
for laboratory analysis, prior to admittance into the NC Brownfields Program. Borings were
advanced at the site to depths up to 20 feet below the ground surface (bgs). Based on the
laboratory results, impacted soils located closest to Stewart Creek were detected in two areas
designated as the former Eastern Drum Storage Area (SVOCs, PCBs, and metals) and former
EMP Vern,,.. June 2018

DocuSign Envelope ID: E6518943-A4B0-498F-A5EB-83693863D85B
Building 9 (drainage pipe and USTs).
VOCs:
Tetrahydrofuran (THF) was detected at concentrations ranging from 150 to 260 milligrams per
kilogram (mg/kg) in two samples near the drainage pipe at Building 9 (G-69-D-1,4), above
Industrial Screening Levels (ISLs).
SVOCs:
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene (ranging from 0.74 to 2.80 mg/kg), benzo(a)anthracene (1.40 to 1.80
mg/kg), benzo(b)fluoranthene (1.50 to 1.60 mg/kg), and benzo(k)fluoranthene (23.0 mg/kg) were
detected at concentrations above Residential Screening Levels (RSLs) in various samples near the
Eastern Drum Storage area. Benzo(a)pyrene (0.42 to 42.0 mg/kg), indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene (3.80
to 27 mg/kg), benzo(a)anth race ne (17.6 to 41.6 mg/kg), benzo(b)fluoranthene (12.0 to 35.0
mg/kg), and dibenzo(ah)anthracene (0.44 to 12.0 mg/kg) were detected at concentrations above
Industrial Screening Levels (ISLs) in various samples taken from the Eastern Drum Storage and UST
areas.
Various other constituents were detected above laboratory limits in the samples taken from the
Eastern Drum Storage Area, a sample from the drainage pipe, and a sample taken from the former
THF, Cyclohexanone, and MEK UST area.
Metals:
Metals were not analyzed for the soil samples taken from the area of soil that will potentially be
impacted by this project.
PCBs:
PCB-1242 was detected at concentrations ranging from 12 to 15 mg/kg in two samples taken from
the Eastern Drum Storage Area above ISLs. PCBs were not detected in any other sample taken
from the area of soil that will potentially be impacted by this project.
2) Depth of known or suspected contaminants (feet):
Soil samples were collected from depths ranging from 0 to 16 feet bgs in areas closest to Stewart
Creek.
3) Area of soil disturbed by redevelopment (square feet):
The total area of the Radiator Specialty site disturbed by planned stream restoration is 0.43 acres
along the stream banks according to the finalized grading plans.
4) Depths of soil to be excavated (feet):
Based on the provided plan profile, grading activities at the Radiator Specialty site will be limited
to the upper 15 feet along Stewart Creek.
5) Estimated volume of soil (cubic yards) to be excavated (attach grading plan):
According to Kimley-Horn, approximately 400 cubic yards of soil will be cut along Stewart Creek
while approximately 240 cubic yards will be placed as fill along the creek. The grading plan is
included as Figures 1 through 3. Terracon assumes a portion of the cut soils will be used as fill as
noted on the grading plan.
EMP Version 2, June 2018

DocuSign Envelope ID: E6518943-A4B0-498F-A5EB-83693863D85B
6) Estimated volume of excavated soil (cubic yards) anticipated to be impacted by contaminants:
No sampling of soils has been conducted in the planned stream restoration area. Since soils were
only impacted on other limited portions of the site, it is unlikely that impacted soils will be
encountered within the stream restoration area. If evidence of impacts to soils are noted (such
as staining and discoloration of soils or odors) while grading activities are being conducted, then
the environmental professional should be contacted in accordance with the Contingency Plan
section (Part 9).
7) Estimated volume of contaminated soil expected to be disposed of offsite, if applicable:
Not applicable since impacted soils have not been detected in the area of planned stream
restoration activities; however, according to the conceptual grading plan and cut/fill analysis,
approximately 160 cubic yards of excess soil will be available on the site, assuming cut soils will
be used as fill soils, if not impacted. If the excess soils are removed from the site, written approval
from the NC Brownfields Program will be required for off -site disposal.
Part 1.A MANAGING ONSITE SOIL
If soil is anticipated to be excavated fromthe Brownfield Property, relocated on the Brownfields
Property, or otherwise disturbed during site grading or other redevelopment activities, please
provide a grading plan that clearly illustrates areas of cut and fill (approximate areas & volumes are
acceptable, if only preliminarydata available).
1) HAZARDOUS WASTE DETERMINATION:
a. Does the soil contain a LISTED WASTE as defined in the North Carolina Hazardous
Waste Section under 40 CFR Part 261.31-261.35?..................................... ❑ Yes © No
❑ If yes, explain why below, including the level of knowledge regarding processes
generating the waste (include pertinent analytical results as needed).
Not applicable
❑ If yes, do the soils exceed the "Contained -Out" levels in Attachment 1 of the
North Carolina Contained -In Policy? ...................................................... ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. NOTE: IF SOIL MEETS THE DEFINITION OF A LISTED HAZARDOUS WASTE AND EXCEEDS
THE CONTAINED -OUT LEVELS IN ATTACHMENT 1 TO THE NORTH CAROLINA
CONTAINED -IN POLICYTHE SOIL MAY NOT BE RE -USED ON SITE AND MUST BE
DISPOSED OF IN ACCORDANCE WITH DEQ HAZARDOUS WASTE SECTION RULES AND
REGULATIONS.
c. Does the soil contain a CHARACTERISTIC WASTE? .................................. ❑ Yes © No
❑ If yes, mark reason(s) why below (and include pertinent analytical results).
❑ Ignitability
❑ Corrosivity
❑ Reactivity
❑ Toxicity
❑ TCLP results
❑ Rule of 20 results (20 times total analytical results for an individual
EMP Version 2, June 2018

DocuSign Envelope ID: E6518943-A4B0-498F-A5EB-83693863D85B
hazardous constituent on TCLP list cannot, by test method, exceed regulatory
TCLP standard)
❑ If no, explain rationale:
Soil sampling activities did not identify concentrations capable of exceeding TCLP criteria
using the Rule of 20.
d. NOTE: IF SOIL MEETS THE DEFINITION OF A CHARACTERISTIC HAZARDOUS WASTE, THE
SOIL MAYNOT BE RE -USED ON SITE AND MUST BE DISPOSED OF IN ACCORDANCE
WITH DEQ HAZARDOUS WASTE SECTION RULES AND REGULATIONS.
2) Screening criteria by which soil disposition decisions will be made (e.g., left in place, capped in
place with low permeability barrier, removed to onsite location and capped, removed offsite):
❑ Preliminary Health -Based Residential SRGs
© Preliminary Health -Based Industrial/Commercial SRGs
© Division of Waste Management Risk Calculator (For Brownfields Properties Only)
❑ Site -specific risk -based cleanup level. Please provide details of methods used for
determination/explanation.
Additional comments:
3) If known impacted soil is proposed to be reused within the Brownfields Property Boundary,
please check the measures that will be utilized to ensure safe placement and documentation
of same. Please attach a proposed location diagram/site map.
® Provide documentation of analytical report(s) to Brownfields Project Manager
© Provide documentation of final location, thickness and depth of relocated soil on site map
to Brownfields Project Manager once known
❑ Geotextile to mark depth of fill material.
Provide description of material:
❑ Manage soil under impervious cap ❑ or clean fill ❑
❑ Describe cap or fill:
© Confer with NC BF Project Manager if Brownfield Plat must be revised (or re -recorded if
actions are Post -Recordation).
© GPS the location and provide site map with final location.
❑ Other, please provide a description of the measure:
4) Please describe the following action(s) to betaken during and following excavation and
management of site soils: If soils are to be redistributed on the site, near the creek bed, the
Division of Water Resources (DWR) may be contacted to determine the allowable
EMP Vern— June 2018

DocuSign Envelope ID: E6518943-A4B0-498F-A5EB-83693863D85B
concentrations for placement within the creek bed.
Management of fugitive dust from site
® Yes, describe the method will include:
Soils that are dry and have the potential to migrate through air from the site will be managed
in accordance with typical construction practices. This usually involves a periodic light
application of water to moisten soils and reduce airborne dust.
❑ No, explain rationale:
Field Screening of site soil
® Yes, describe the field screening method, frequency of field screening, person conducting
field screening:
During soil disturbance, soils will be observed for discoloration, odor, or other evidence of
potential contamination. Should the above be noted during site work, the contractor will
contact the project environmental professional to observe the suspect condition. If the
project environmental professional confirms that the material may be impacted (by
observations or by screening with a PID or organic vapor analyzer [OVA]), then soil samples
will be collected and analyzed for VOCs, SVOCs, and RCRA metals as provided in Part 9
(Contingency Plan). In addition, the NC Brownfields Program Project Manager will be
contacted within 48 hours to advise them of the condition.
❑ No, explain rationale:
Soil Sample Collection
® Yes, describe the sampling method (e.g., in -situ grab, composite, stockpile, etc.):
If, during grading, impacted soils are discovered, procedures for screening and sampling the
soils will be implemented as described in Part 9 "Contingency for encountering unknown
tanks, drums, or other waste materials." Based on previous site assessment activities and
conceptual grading plans, it is unlikely that significant soil impacts will be encountered during
the stream restoration activities.
❑ No, explain rationale:
If soil samples are collected for analysis, please check the applicable chemical analytes:
® Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by EPA Method 8260
® Semi -volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) by EPA Method 8270
® Metals RCRA List (8) (arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium, mercury, lead, selenium
and silver): Specify Analytical Method Number(s):
❑ Pesticides: Specify Analytical Method Number(s):
® PCBs: Specify Analytical Method Number(s):
EMIR Version 2, June 2018

DocuSign Envelope ID: E6518943-A4B0-498F-A5EB-83693863D85B
© Other Constituents & Respective Analytical Method(s) (i.e. Hexavalent Chromium,
Herbicides, etc.): Specify Analytical Method Number(s); Manganese by EPA Method
6010.
© Check to confirm that stockpiling of known or suspected impacted soils will be conducted
in accordance with Figure 1 of this EMP. Stockpile methodology should provide erosion
control, prohibiting contact between surface water/precipitation and contaminated soil,
and preventing contaminated runoff. Explain any variances or provide additional details
as needed:
❑ Final grade sampling of exposed native soil (i.e., soil that will not be under buildings or
permanent hardscape). Select chemical analyses for final grade samples with check boxes
below (check all that apply):
❑ Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by EPA Method 8260
❑ Semi -volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) by EPA Method 8270
❑ Metals RCRA List (8) (arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium, mercury, lead, selenium and
silver): Specify Analytical Method Number(s):
❑ Pesticides: Specify Analytical Method Number(s):
❑ PCBs: Specify Analytical Method Number(s):
❑ Other Constituents & Respective Analytical Method(s) (i.e. Hexavalent Chromium,
Herbicides, etc.):
Please provide a scope of work for final grade sampling, including a diagram of soil
sampling locations, number of samples to be collected, and brief sampling methodology.
Samples should be collected from 0-2 ft below ground surface, with the exception of VOCs
which should be taken from 1-2 ft below ground surface. Alternatively, a work plan for
final grade sampling may be submitted under separate cover.
® If final grade sampling was NOT selected, please explain rationale:
Final grade sampling will not be completed at the site because previous sampling activities
have not detected impacted soils at the site and the Historic Stewart Creek Enhancement
Project Phase III is not located near identified on -site contamination. After the bank grading is
completed, the area will be landscaped, and the Historic Stewart Creek Enhancement Project
Phase II is not designed for recreational purposes. Limited amounts of organic rich virgin
topsoil from a commercial landscape material vendor if needed will be used in planters and in
proposed landscape area. The PD does not intend to collect samples of virgin landscaping
materials prior to placement on the Brownfields Property.
Part 1.13 IMPORTED FILL SOIL
EMP Version 2, June 2018

DocuSign Envelope ID: E6518943-A4B0-498F-A5EB-83693863D85B
NO SOIL MAY BE BROUGHT ONTO THE BROWNFIELDS PROPERTY WITHOUT PRIOR APPROVAL FROM
THE BROWNFIELDS PROGRAM. According to the Brownfields IR 15, "Documenting imported soil (by
sampling, analysis, and reporting in accordance with review and written approval in advance by the
Brownfields Program), will safeguard the liability protections provided by the brownfields agreement
and is in the best interest of the prospective developer/property owner."
Requirements for importing fill:
1) Will fill soil be imported to the site? ................................................... ❑ Yes © No ❑ Unknown
2) If yes, what is the estimated volume of fill soil to be imported?
Not Applicable
3) If yes, what is the anticipated depth that fill soil will be placed at the property? (if a range of
depths, please list the range.)
Not Applicable
4) Provide the source of fill, including: location, site history, nearby environmental concerns, etc.
Attach aerial photos, maps, historic Sanborn maps and a borrow source site history:
Not Applicable. During grading for the Historic Stewart Creek Enhancement Project Phase 111, soils
along the creek will be moved from cut areas to fill areas. No soils will be imported to balance
the site.
5) PRIOR TO ITS PLACEMENT AT THE BROWNFIELDS PROPERTY, provide a plan to analyze fill soil
to demonstrate that it meets acceptable standards applicable to the site and can be approved
for use at the Brownfields property.
Not Applicable
6) Please check the applicable chemical analytes for fill soil samples (Check all that apply):
❑ Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by EPA Method 8260
❑ Semi -volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) by EPA Method 8270
❑ Metals RCRA List (8) (arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium, mercury, lead, selenium
and silver): Specify Analytical Method Number(s):
❑ Pesticides: Specify Analytical Method Number(s):
❑ PCBs: Specify Analytical Method Number(s):
❑ Other Constituents & Respective Analytical Method(s) (i.e. Hexavalent Chromium,
Herbicides, etc.):
7) The scope of work for import fill sampling maybe provided below or in a Work Plan submitted
separately for DEQ review and approval. Attach specific location maps for in -situ borrow sites.
If using a quarry, provide information on the type of material to be brought onto the
Brownfields Property.
EMP Version 2, June 2018

DocuSign Envelope ID: E6518943-A4B0-498F-A5EB-83693863D85B
Not Applicable; however, if fill soils are needed for the site from an off -site source, the soils will
be imported from either the Martin Marietta quarry on Beatties Ford Road or the Vulcan quarry
which have been approved as sources of imported soils by the NC Brownfields Program.
Part 1.0 EXPORTED SOIL
NO SOIL MAY LEAVE THE BROWNFIELDS PROPERTY WITHOUT APPROVAL FROM THE BROWNFIELDS
PROGRAM. FAILURE TO OBTAIN APPROVAL MAY VIOLATE A BROWN FIELDSAGREEMENT CAUSING
A REOPENER OR JEOPARDIZING ELIGIBILITY IN THE PROGRAM, ENDANGERING LIABILITY
PROTECTIONS AND MAKING SAID ACTION POSSIBLY SUBJECT TO ENFORCEMENT. JUSTIFICATIONS
PROVIDED BELOW MUST BE APPROVED BY THE PROGRAM IN WRITING PRIOR TO COMPLETING
TRANSPORT ACTIVITIES. Please refer to Brownfields IR 15 for additional details.
1) If export from a Brownfields Property is anticipated, please provide details regarding the
proposed export actions. Volume of exported soil, depths, location from which soil will be
excavated on site, related sampling results, etc. Provide a site map with locations of
export and sampling results included.
According to the conceptual grading plan and cut/fill analysis, approximately 160 cubic yards
of excess soil will be available on the site, assuming the cut soils will be used as fill soils. If the
excess soils are removed from the site, written approval from the NC Brownfields Program
will be required for off -site disposal. Non -impacted soils, (to be determined by an estimate 1
soil sample analyzed for VOCs, SVOCs, and Manganese) will be exported to a landfill or
possibly another Brownfields property as suitable fill, if needed, and approved by the
Brownfields Program.
2) To what type of facility will the export Brownfields soil be sent?
® Subtitle D/Municipal Solid Waste Landfill (analytical program to be determined by
landfill)
® Permitted but Unlined Landfill (i.e. LCID, C&D, etc.) Analytical program to be
determined by the accepting landfill.
❑ Landfarm or other treatment facility
© Use as fill at another suitable Brownfields Property — determination that a site is
suitable will require, at a minimum, that similar concentrations of the same or similar
contaminants already exist at both sites, use of impacted soil will not increase the
potential for risk to human health the environment at the receiving Brownfields
property, and that a record of the acceptance of such soil from the property owner of
the receiving site is provided to Brownfields. Please provide additional details below.
❑ Use as Beneficial Fill off -site at a non-Brownfields Property — Please provide
documentation of approval from the property owner for receipt of fill material. This will
also require approval by the DEQ Solid Waste Section. Additional information is
provided in IR 15. Please provide additional details below.
EMP Version 2, June 2018

DocuSign Envelope ID: E6518943-A4B0-498F-A5EB-83693863D85B
3) Additional Details: (if transfer of soil to another property is requested above, please
provide details related to the proposed plans).
To be determined.
Part 1.13 MANAGEMENT OF UTILITY TRENCHES
❑ Install liner between native impacted soils and base of utility trench before filling with clean fill
(preferred)
❑ Last out, first in principle for impacted soils (if soil can safely be reused onsite and is not a
hazardous waste), i.e., impacted soils are placed back at approximately the depths they were
removed from such that impacted soil is not placed at a greater depth than the original depth from
which it was excavated.
❑ Evaluate whether necessary to install barriers in conduits to prevent soil vapor transport, and/or
degradation of conduit materials due to direct impact with contaminants.
❑ If yes, provide specifications on barrier materials
❑ If no, include rationale here:
Other comments regarding managing impacted soil in utility trenches:
Although utility trenches are not planned as part of the stream restoration project, concerns and methods
for environmental handling of soils do not preclude nor modify any of the Occupational Safety and Health
Administration (OSHA) requirements for worker safety incumbent upon contractors for regular site safety
and trenching/excavation activities. OSHA requirements will dictate adjustments of the soil management
methods where necessary regarding OSHA construction safety.
PART 2. GROUNDWATER — Please fill out the information below.
1) What is the depth to groundwater at the Brownfields Property?
During environmental assessments conducted by Hart & Hickman (2002), the depth to
groundwater was measured in four monitoring wells located along the eastern boundary of the
Radiator Specialty site (near Stewart Creek) at depths ranging from 21.17 and 29.76 feet bgs.
None of the wells were located within the planned limits of the stream restoration project. Depth
to groundwater is anticipated to be shallower near Stewart Creek. Grading activities could
encounter groundwater at the site.
2) Is groundwater known to be contaminated by ® onsite ❑ offsite ❑ both or ❑ unknown
sources? Describe source(s):
The on -site groundwater samples collected during the 2002 Environmental Assessment contained
chloroform, 1,1-dichloroethene, cis-1,2-dichloroethene, tetrachloroethene, trichloroethene, and
EMP Version 2, June 2018

DocuSign Envelope ID: E6518943-A4B0-498F-A5EB-83693863D85B
vinyl chloride above their respective NCAC 2L Standards in monitoring wells MW-3, MW-4 and
MW-5, the closest wells to the stream restoration area. No groundwater sampling has been
conducted within the planned stream restoration area of the site.
3) What is the direction of groundwater flow at the Brownfields Property?
According to the 2002 Environmental Assessment, groundwater appears to be flowing east-
southeast towards Stewart Creek.
4) Will groundwater likely be encountered during planned redevelopment activities?
© Yes ❑ No
If yes, describe these activities:
According to the grading plan depicting cut and fill activities along the creek, it is likely that
groundwater may be encountered during the Historic Stewart Creek Enhancement Project
Phase III.
Regardless of the answer; in the event that contaminated groundwater is encountered during
redevelopment activities (even if no is checked above), list activities for contingent
management of groundwater (e.g., dewatering of groundwater from excavations or
foundations, containerizing, offsite disposal, discharge to sanitary sewer, NPDES permit, or
sampling procedures).
If groundwater is encountered during stream restoration activities, appropriate worker safety
measures will be undertaken and groundwater will be allowed to re -infiltrate for approximately
24 hours if the construction schedule is not affected. No soil will be added to the excavation
during that time period. If the construction schedule is affected or if accumulated water
remains in an excavation after allowing time to re -infiltrate, samples of the accumulated water
will be collected and analyzed for VOCs, SVOCs, and PCBs to determine if contaminants are
present. Accumulated water that contains contaminants above NCAC 2B Surface Water
Standards will be containerized and disposed at an off -site permitted facility. Accumulated
water that does not contain contaminants above NCAC 2B Surface Water Standards will be
managed on the site or discharged to surface water or the storm sewer in accordance with
municipal, state and federal requirements.
5) Are monitoring wells currently present on the Brownfields Property? .................. El Yes © No
If yes, are any monitoring wells routinely monitored through DEQ or other
agencies?............................................................................................................. ❑ Yes ❑ No
6) Please check methods to be utilized in the management of known and previously unidentified
wells.
❑ Abandonment of site monitoring wells in accordance with all applicable regulations. It is
the Brownfields Program's intent to allow proper abandonment of well(s) as specified in the
Brownfields Agreement, except if required for active monitoring through another section of
DEQ or the EPA
❑ Location of existing monitoring wells marked
❑ Existing monitoring wells protected from disturbance
EMP Version 2, June 2018

DocuSign Envelope ID: E6518943-A4B0-498F-A5EB-83693863D85B
® Newly identified monitoring wells will be marked and protected from further disturbance
until notification to DEQ Brownfields can be made and approval for abandonment is given.
7) Please provide additional details as needed:
Please note, disturbance of existing site monitoring wells without approval by DEQ is not permissible.
If monitoring wells are damaged and/or destroyed, DEQ may require that the PD be responsible for
replacement of the well.
PART 3. SURFACE WATER — Please fill out the information below.
1) Is surface water present at the property? ® Yes ❑ No
Stewart Creek traverses the eastern boundary of the property flowing from generally north to
south. Along this section of Stewart Creek is the confluence of Irwin Creek. The stream
restoration project will not alter the location of Stewart Creek or Irwin Creek.
2) Attach a map showing the location of surface water at the Brownfields Property.
3) Is surface water at the property known to be contaminated? ❑ Yes © No
Surface water samples were collected from Stewart Creek as part of past assessment activities;
however, no impacts were detected in the surface water samples. Impacted groundwater was
detected in monitoring wells located up -gradient and near Stewart Creek.
4) Will workers or the public be in contact with surface water during planned redevelopment
activities? © Yes ❑ No
The project involves restoration of Stewart Creek including stream bank grading and placement
of rip rap boulders to control flow within the stream boundaries. Contact with surface water is
expected during the stream restoration activities.
5) In the event that contaminated surface water is encountered during redevelopment activities,
or clean surface water enters open excavations, list activities for management of such events
(e.g. flooding, contaminated surface water run-off, stormwater impacts):
Encountering contaminated surface water is not anticipated based on previous surface water
sampling results. Excavations and trenches in the areas where potentially impacted soils could be
encountered and near property boundaries shall be graded, bermed, or provided with an
equivalent barrier, where necessary, to help prevent stormwater from entering excavations and
stormwater run-off from leaving the site boundaries. If stormwater or water from an unidentified
source collects in excavation areas, appropriate worker safety measures will be undertaken and
water will be allowed to infiltrate for approximately 24 hours (if it does not affect the construction
schedule). If the construction schedule is affected or accumulated water remains in an excavation
after allowing time to infiltrate, samples of the accumulated water will be collected and analyzed
for VOCs (EPA Method 8260), SVOCs (EPA Method 9270), and PCBs. Accumulated water that
contains contaminants above NCAC 2B Surface Water Standards will be containerized and
disposed at an off -site permitted facility. Accumulated water that does not contain contaminants
EMP Vern,,,, June 2018

DocuSign Envelope ID: E6518943-A4B0-498F-A5EB-83693863D85B
above NCAC 2B Surface Water Standards will be managed on the site or discharged to surface
water or the storm sewer in accordance with municipal, state and federal requirements.
PART 4. SEDIMENT— Please fill out the information below.
1) Are sediment sources present on the property? ® Yes ❑ No
2) If yes, is sediment on the property known to be contaminated? ® Yes ❑ No
Arochlor-1242 (PCB) was detected in a sediment sample (SW-2) that was collected from an
upstream portion of Irwin Creek (above the confluence with Stewart Creek) in 2002 by Hart &
Hickman as part of the assessment of the Radiator Specialty site. The concentration exceeded
the PCB screening levels. Arochlor-1242 was also detected in a duplicate downstream sediment
sample (SW-3D) near Wilkinson Boulevard at a lower concentration. The PCB detection was
considered to be from an upstream source of Irwin Creek, not the Radiator Specialty site.
3) Will workers or the public be in contact with sediment during planned redevelopment
activities? ® Yes ❑ No The project involves restoration of Stewart Creek including stream bank
grading and placement of rip rap boulders to control flow within the stream boundaries. Contact
with sediments in the creek is expected during the stream restoration activities. There is also a
minimal amount of work associated with sediment removal from Irwin Creek, near its confluence
with Stewart Creek.
4) Attach a map showing location of known contaminated sediment at the property.
5) In the event that contaminated sediment is encountered during redevelopment activities, list
activities for management of such events (stream bed disturbance):
During disturbance of sediments in the creek, the removed materials will be observed for
discoloration, odor, or other evidence of potential contamination. Should the above be noted
during site work, the contractor will contact the project environmental professional to observe
the suspect condition. If the project environmental professional confirms that the material may
be impacted (by observations or by screening with a PID or organic vapor analyzer [OVA]), then
soil samples will be collected and analyzed for VOCs, SVOCs, RCRA metals, PCBs, and Manganese
as provided in Part 9 (Contingency Plan). In addition, the NCDEQ Brownfields Project Manager will
be contacted within 48 hours to advise them of the condition.
PART 5. SOIL VAPOR — Please fill out the information below
1) Do concentrations of volatile organic compounds at the Brownfields property exceed that
following vapor intrusion screening levels (current version) in the following media:
IHSB Residential Screening Levels:
Soil Vapor............® Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
Groundwater ...... ❑ Yes ❑ No ® Unknown
EMP Version 2, June 2018

DocuSign Envelope ID: E6518943-A4B0-498F-A5EB-83693863D85B
IHSB Industrial/Commercial Screening Levels:
Soil Vapor ............ ❑ Yes © No ❑ Unknown
Groundwater ...... ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown
2) Attach a map showing the locations of soil vapor contaminants that exceed site screening
levels.
Soil vapor samples have been collected in the western portion of the Radiator Specialty site,
away from Stewart Creek.
3) If applicable, at what depth(s) is soil vapor known to be contaminated?
Not Applicable
4) Will workers encounter contaminated soil vapor during planned redevelopment activities?
❑ Yes © No ❑ Unknown
5) In the event that contaminated soil vapor is encountered during redevelopment activities
(trenches, manways, basements, or other subsurface work), list activities for management of
such contact:
If contaminated soil vapors are detected during grading or construction activities involving
excavation of subsurface utility trenches or basement structures, the project environmental
professional will be notified to assess the presence of the vapors with a PID. If vapors do not
readily dissipate, soil samples may be obtained and analyzed for VOCs and SVOCs to evaluate the
source of the vapors and appropriate worker safety measures will be employed (such as fans) to
allow the workers to safely complete their work and the NC Brownfields Program Project Manager
will be notified in accordance with the EMP.
PART 6. SUB -SLAB SOIL VAPOR — Please fill out the information below if existing buildings or
foundations will be retained in the redevelopment.
1) Are sub -slab soil vapor data available for the Brownfields Property? ❑ Yes © No ❑ Unknown
2) If data indicates that sub -slab soil vapor concentrations exceed screening levels, attach a map
showing the location of these exceedances.
3) At what depth(s) is sub -slab soil vapor known to be contaminated? ❑ 0-6 inches ❑ Other,
please describe:
There is no evidence that sub -slab vapor sampling activities were conducted on the site.
4) Will workers encounter contaminated sub -slab soil vapor during planned redevelopment
activities? ❑ Yes ®No ❑ Unknown
5) In the event that contaminated soil vapor is encounter during redevelopment activities, list
activities for management of such contact
If contaminated vapors are detected during grading or construction activities involving excavation
of subsurface utility trenches, the project environmental professional will be notified to assess
the presence of the vapors with a PID. If vapors do not readily dissipate, soil samples may be
obtained and analyzed for VOCs and SVOCs to evaluate the source of the vapors and appropriate
EMP Vern,,.. June 2018

DocuSign Envelope ID: E6518943-A4B0-498F-A5EB-83693863D85B
worker safety measures will be employed (such as fans) to allow the workers to safely complete
their work and the NC Brownfields Program Project Manager will be notified in accordance with
the EMP.
PART 7. INDOOR AIR — Please fill out the information below.
1) Are indoor air data available for the Brownfields Property? ❑ Yes © No ❑ Unknown
2) Attach a map showing the location(s) where indoor air contaminants exceed site screening
levels.
3) If the structures where indoor air has been documented to exceed risk -based screening levels
will not be demolished as part of redevelopment activities, will workers encounter
contaminated indoor air during planned redevelopment activities? ❑ Yes ❑ No ® Unknown
4) In the event that contaminated indoor air is encountered during redevelopment activities, list
activities for management of such contact:
Although not anticipated, in the event contaminated indoor air is encountered during restoration
activities, the work area will be evacuated and appropriate safety screening of the vapors will be
performed. If results indicate further action is warranted, appropriate engineering controls (such
as use of industrial fans) will be implemented and the NC Brownfields Program Project Manager
will be notified in accordance with the EMP.
VAPOR INTRUSION MITIGATION SYSTEM — Please fill out the information below.
Is a vapor intrusion mitigation system (VIMS) proposed for this Brownfields Property?
© Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
If yes, ❑ VIMS Plan Attached or ❑ VIMS Plan to be submitted separately
If submitted separately, provide date: Tract E of the Radiator Specialty site has been approved for
installation of a vapor intrusion mitigation system.
VIMS Plan shall be signed and sealed by a NC Professional Engineer
If no, please provide a brief rationale as to why no vapor mitigation plan is warranted:
Although a vapor mitigation system has been deemed necessary for certain restoration activities (Tract E)
on the Radiator Specialty site, no VIMS is planned for the Historic Stewart Creek Enhancement Project
Phase III addressed by this EMP.
CONTINGENCY PLAN — encountering unknown tanks, drums, or other waste materials
In this section please provide actions that will be taken to identify or manage unknown potential
new sources of contamination. During redevelopment activities, it is not uncommon that
unknown tanks, drums, fuel lines, landfills, orother waste materials are encountered. Notification
EMP Vern— June 2018

DocuSign Envelope ID: E6518943-A4B0-498F-A5EB-83693863D85B
to DEQ Brownfields Project Manager, UST Section, Fire Department, and/orother officials, as
necessary and appropriate, is required when new potential source(s) of contamination are
discovered. These Notification Requirements were outlined on Page 1 of this EMP.
Should potentially impacted materials be identified that are inconsistent with known site impacts,
the DEQ Brownfields Project Manager will be notified and a sampling plan will be prepared based
on the EMP requirements and site -specific factors. Samples will generally be collected to
document the location of the potential impacts.
Check the following chemical analyses that are to be conducted on newly identified releases:
© Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by EPA Method 8260
© Semi -volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) by EPA Method 8270
© Metals RCRA List (8) (arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium, mercury, lead, selenium, and
silver)
❑ Pesticides: Specify Analytical Method Number(s):
© PCBs: Specify Analytical Method Number(s):
PCBs have been detected on the Radiator Specialty site.
© Other Constituents & Analytical Method(s) (i.e. Hexavalent Chromium, Herbicides, etc.)
Please note, if field observations indicate the need for additional analyses, they should be
conducted, even if not listed here. Manganese by Method 6010
Please provide details on the proposed methods of managing the following commonly encountered
issues during redevelopment of Brownfields Properties.
There is a possibility that materials of unknown type (tanks, drums or impacted soils) could be present on
the site. The worker and contractor must be able to recognize when conditions change at the site so
conditions can be properly managed. In the event such conditions are encountered during site restoration
activities, the environmental actions noted below will be taken.
During soil disturbance, workers and contractors will observe soils for evidence of potential impacts.
Evidence of potential impacts includes odors, soil discoloration, or discovery of a tank, drums, a drain
field, or buried debris. Should any of the above be noted during site work, the contractor will contact the
project environmental professional to observe the suspect condition. If the project environmental
professional confirms that the material may be impacted, then the procedures below will be
implemented. In addition, the NCDEQ Brownfields project manager will be contacted within 48 hours of
discovery.
If evidence of potential soil impacts is encountered during grading and/or the installation or removal of
utilities, excavation will proceed only as far as needed to allow grading and/or construction of the utility
to continue and/or only as far as needed to allow alternative corrective measures to be taken.
Suspect soil excavated during grading and/or utility installation or removal may be stockpiled and covered
in a secure area on the site to allow construction to continue. Suspect soil will be underlain by and covered
with minimum 10-mil plastic sheeting. At least one representative sample of the soil will be collected for
EMP Vern— June 2018

DocuSign Envelope ID: E6518943-A4B0-498F-A5EB-83693863D85B
analysis of VOCs by EPA Method 8260B, SVOCs by EPA Method 8270D, and PCBs.
Soil sampled in accordance with the preceding paragraph will be managed in the manner described below
based on laboratory analyses:
1) If detectable levels of compounds are found that do not exceed DEQ IHSB Industrial/Commercial
PSRGs at the Radiator Specialty Site and the TCLP concentrations (if applicable) are less than
hazardous waste criteria, then the soil may be used on the site as fill.
2) If detectable levels of compounds are found that exceed NCDEQ IHSB Industrial/Commercial
PSRGs at the Radiator Specialty site and the TCLP concentrations (if applicable) are less than
hazardous waste criteria, then the soil, with NCDEQ's written approval, may be used on the site
as fill below an impervious surface or two feet of clean fill.
3) Soil may be transported to a permitted facility such as a landfill provided that the soil is accepted
at the disposal facility.
4) If excavation of impacted soil occurs, confirmation sampling will be conducted for purposes of
recording areas of impacts remaining at the site. It is anticipated that confirmation samples will
be collected at regular intervals along the base and sidewalls of a given excavation. Base samples
will not be collected if the estimated groundwater elevation is within 1.5 feet of the excavation
floor. The confirmation samples will be analyzed for VOCs, SVOCs, and PCBs.
Underground Storage Tanks:
If USTs are discovered on the site during construction activities and impacts uniquely associated with a
UST release are identified, the UST and petroleum -impacted soil will be analyzed for Total Petroleum
Hydrocarbons (Diesel/Gasoline Range Organics) as required by the NCDEQ UST Section. If exceedances in
the soils occur, work will be stopped in the area and coordination with the NC Brownfields Program Project
Manager will be conducted for further regulatory requirements.
If a drum is encountered during construction, the contents will be identified by the contractor, and if
appropriate, the contents of the drum profiled and disposed at a permitted facility. The protocols noted
above for soils will be followed for areas near any drums that are encountered.
If buried piping is encountered and must be removed to allow construction to proceed, the contractor will
inspect the pipe for fluids, collect and sample fluids where appropriate, and look for evidence of a release
using field screening methods (visual and olfactory). If a release is suspected, NCDEQ will be contacted to
discuss the appropriate course of action.
Sub -Grade Feature/Pit:
If a sub -grade feature, structure, or pit is encountered during construction, it will be inspected for the
presence of waste fluids. If waste fluids are present, they will be removed, profiled and disposed at a
permitted facility by the contractor. If the structure does not require removal for construction purposes,
it will be filled with soil or suitable fill and construction will proceed. Where appropriate, the bottom may
be penetrated before backfilling to prevent rainwater accumulation. If waste is present, the waste will be
set aside in a secure area, sampled as required by NCDEQand disposed at an off -site location. If a concrete
structure must be removed and the observed waste characteristics indicate the concrete may contain
hazardous constituents, the concrete will be sampled and analyzed by methods specified by the disposal
EMP Version 2, June 2018

DocuSign Envelope ID: E6518943-A4B0-498F-A5EB-83693863D85B
facility.
Buried Waste Material:
If landfilled material is encountered at the site during construction activities, the nature and extent of the
buried material will be evaluated (e.g., by test pits) and NCDEQ will be notified to discuss the appropriate
course of action. Site debris will be segregated as needed, and disposed or recycled at an approved facility,
or reused on the site as beneficial fill.
Re -Use of Impacted Soils On -Site:
During grading for the stream restoration project, soils along the creek will be moved from cut areas to
fill areas. We do not anticipate encountering impacted soils at the site.
If unknown, impacted soil is identified on -site, management on -site can be considered after the
project team provides the necessary information, outlined in Part 1.A Item 11, for Brownfields Project
Manager approval prior to final placement on -site.
If other potential contingency plans are pertinent, please provide other details or scenarios as needed
below:
POST -REDEVELOPMENT REPORTING
❑X Check this box to acknowledge that a Redevelopment Summary Report will be required for the
project. If the project duration is longer than one year, an annual update is required and will be due by
January 31 of each year, or 30 days after each one-year anniversary of the effective date of this EMP (as
agreed upon with the Project Manager). These reports will be required for as long as physical
redevelopment of the Brownfields Property continues, except that the final Redevelopment Summary
Report will be submitted within 90 days after completion of redevelopment. Based on the estimated
construction schedule, the first Redevelopment Summary Report is anticipated to be submitted in
January 2021.
The Redevelopment Summary Report shall include environment -related activities since the last
report, with a summary and drawings, that describes:
actions taken on the Brownfields Property;
soil grading and cut and fill actions;
methodology(ies) employed for field screening, sampling and laboratory analysis of
environmental media;
4. stockpiling, containerizing, decontaminating, treating, handling, laboratory analysis and
ultimate disposition of any soil, groundwater or other materials suspected or confirmed to
be contaminated with regulated substances; and
removal of any contaminated soil, water or other contaminated materials (for example,
concrete, demolition debris) from the Brownfields Property (copies of all legally required
manifests shall be included).
X❑ Check box to acknowledge consent to provide a NC licensed P.G. or P.E. sealed, Redevelopment
EMP Version 2, June 2018

DocuSign Envelope ID: E6518943-A4B0-498F-A5EB-83693863D85B
Summary Report in compliance with the site's Brownfields Agreement.
APPROVAL SIGNATURES
Brownfields Project Number: 06016-02-060
Brownfields Project Name: Former Radiator Specialty Site
/—DocuSigned by:
9/30/2020
Prospective Developer: Mecklenburg County Date:
Printed Name/Title/Company: Leslie Johnson / Assistant County Manager
9/30/2020
Consultant: Terracon Consultants Inc. Date:
Printed Name/Title/Company: Christopher L. Corbitt / Senior Geologist
Brownfields Project Manager: Joselyn Harriger Date:
EMP Version 2, June 2018 23

DocuSign Envelope ID: E6518943-A4B0-498F-A5EB-83693863D85B
Figure I
NCBP Diagram for Temporary
Containment of Impacted or Potentially
Impacted Soil.
�1'OtiS-Section View
Top Plastic: Covcr Sheeting: Underlincr: 1 layer, minimum of 10
(l Layer, minimum: 10 mil thick) r mil thick plastic
Berm
(Straw hales,
composted earth, etc.)
Land Contaminated Soils
Surface!
1 /
Map View
Straw Bale Berm
Weight
(If plastic
cover used)
Liza Alt
Plastic
Sheeting
Note: Adapted from NC DEQ LIST Section "Guidelines for Eat Situ Petroleum Contaminated Soil Remediation" dated December, 1, 2013
EMP Version 2, June 2018 24

DocuSign Envelope ID: E6518943-A4B0-498F-A5EB-83693863D85B
Welch, McKhenzy A
From:
Roberts, Stephanie <[e-mail]>
Sent:
Monday, April 13, 2020 4:24 PM
To:
Welch, McKhenzy A
Cc:
Wilhelm, Will; Maschoff, Jake
Subject:
RE: [External]EMP finalizing
Yes. We will be completing a stream project on the properties listed below.
From: Welch, McKhenzy A <[e-mail]>
Sent: Monday, April 13, 2020 4:15 PM
To: Roberts, Stephanie <[e-mail]>
Cc: Wilhelm, Will <[e-mail]>; Maschoff, Jake <Jake.Maschoff @kimley-horn.com>
Subject: [External]EMP finalizing
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you
recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Afternoon,
Can you respond to this email acknowledging that you, the property developer, are aware of the generation of the EMPs
and upcoming redevelopment work commencing at the Classic Coffee, Wesley Village II, and Radiator Specialty sites?
(per NCDEQ's request). A copy of this will be included in the EMP.
McKhenzy Welch, CPESC
Terracon Consultants, Inc
P 980-938-7436 1 M 704-430-3174
Terracon provides environmental, facilities, geotechnical, and materials consulting engineering services delivered with
responsiveness, resourcefulness, and reliability.
Private and confidential as detailed here (www.terracon.com/disclaimer). If you cannot access the hyperlink, please e-mail
sender.

om&9 Envelope ID: E6emaA4Bs4mnA5EESmySDbB
�
,
�
�

DocuSign Envelope ID: E6518943-A4B0-498F-A5EB-83693863D85B
:ol :� :so �rt �n��
OJOH (« Aajw.rA
81I,30Nd (INV Iktl'Id
80,E loN
R a
-•- -
NOlyraoisaa w
JI33ii� ZadM
3
I
�
I
I
-
$ 5-
M
II
l
o
II
�
illll
I
I
I
�
�'
II
�
n
i
8
I
-I
.I
'I ICI
I
I
a
SI
I
�
I
l
_
,�I
I
ql
S
J
m
LL
N
E m
X �
O Ip
tl3aZS £ a c
BLS m o
U
a� 2
O N
c
1 8
a
N1LON '�'o � • I
u� S
b- "'.rv33H ODI'd
S 3NI
' 1
II
111 4 L
I� F'E-
i I .III _I N
1 I
li
III i
US
31,
IS
nn &
erg .�tZt`
1�
t
a
I I
1 I'
r
o`er f o!<,rr
��l`vc _
V
It
µ N
a.l
{ �1
��BV ays 3

DocuSign Envelope ID: E6518943-A4B0-498F-A5EB-83693863D85B
` `
roeea ��+uor,m�
zabraT
711,aoNa ak I.vv'La
91
ao� �o�
e=
-
uioHK<�La�w�
--' `—
NOLLVX0191H WV31419
1
L
-s
JIM3 MVM3.LS
—os�rs� isr�
�eov
1
t t-
%
X
-
�
-
ffi
-
1I
I ++ p1 -
� , �� I �,11•VI' I ll,lf:l;lrl f
kkvv ;
-
�I
h
W ;fi/ h IIII{I VI
C go.
i
g :1
�I
I 'I
s
.9 1
I•
I 1111
Iyllitill,l
� I tl IIj'I�III•`V I II I
is
rr
/
lil
d
II
1 1
11171
ch tti
N�
� s f
a
-
'R
'I
fZ'6'� 133N5 335 -
00•E61• b153NfjH°1bW
d l6
R C
U) = O
a
Z)
00
O E c
W 00
�U
WLU
w/
LL U Y c
(D 0 Y
U) U
i
LL O
� y O
� V R
(6 r s
U
w
2
C
0�
u�
o U
� z
m ° 0
° o
L N
d �
L L
o U
r
L N
r
p O 00 Z O
CO N
r Q
a n iz� o
Q Q J J
a� � TU TU
a
i
o d
a G Gl C"

om&9Envelope ID: ES1mgG4m4mBA5EESmygDbB
�.
s�
§
1
-5�-�-�
«CR?�-�
�------------
�
|$
�
. +
a
�
-
i
|
-
i
i
|
[
i )
�
\
'----------_
r
_
s
+
n-
$ /
)
|!|
{§
k7
})§
< E
_
)||
\ 7
\ \ti
)k#
2 �k
/[
/(
:2
$E
%a
cr
2-
�
m;
)
Q'
2/
- 3 , 2 +
+
[
\�
\
/
§
�
.
� e 5
^ w_ /
r /
� � �

DocuSign Envelope ID: E6518943-A4B0-498F-A5EB-83693863D85B
Table 1
Summary of PCB in Soil Analtyical Results
Bryant Park -Tract F Post -Grading Sampling Plan
Charlotte, North Carolina
H&H Job No. BTP-003
Sample ID
Sample Depth
(feet)
Sample Date
Units
PCBs (8082)
PCB-1248 (Aroclor
1248)
Al (0-2') Comp
0-2'
5/30/2014
mg/kg
<0.0420
Al (3-5') Comp
3-5'
5/30/2014
mg/kg
<0.0414
A2 (0-2') Comp
0-2'
5/30/2014
mg/kg
<0.0399
A2 (3-5') Comp
3-5'
5/30/2014
mg/kg
<0.0422
B (0-2') Comp
0-2'
5/30/2014
mg/kg
<0.0401
C (0-2') Comp
0-2'
5/30/2014
mg/kg
<0.0412
C (3-5') Comp
3-5'
5/30/2014
mg/kg
0.0425
D (0-2') Comp
0-2'
5/30/2014
mg/kg
<0.0393
E (0-2') Comp
0-2'
6/2/2014
mg/kg
4.800
E-BACKFILL (0-2)
0-2'
7/8/2014
mg/kg
<0.0366
F (0-2') Comp
0-2'
6/2/2014
mg/kg
2.330
F-BACKFILL (0-2)
0-2'
7/8/2014
mg/kg
<0.0367
G (0-2') Comp
0-2'
6/2/2014
mg/kg
0.0744
H (0-2') Comp
0-2'
6/2/2014
mg/kg
<0.0368
1 (0-2') Comp
0-2'
6/2/2014
mg/kg
<0.0393
J (0-2') Comp
0-2'
6/2/2014
mg/kg
<0.0353
K (0-2') Comp
0-2'
6/2/2014
mg/kg
0.0945
L (0-2') Comp
0-2'
5/30/2014
mg/kg
<0.0383
L (3-5') Comp
3-5'
5/30/2014
mg/kg
<0.0409
M (0-2') Comp
0-2'
5/30/2014
mg/kg
<0.373
M (3-5') Comp
3-5'
5/30/2014
mg/kg
0.502
N (0-2') Comp
0-2'
5/30/2014
mg/kg
0.101
O (0-2') Comp
0-2'
5/30/2014
mg/kg
<0.0396
O (3-5') Comp
3-5'
5/30/2014
mg/kg
<0.0384
P 0-2' Comp
0-2'
5/30/2014
mg/kg
0.331
Screening Criteria
SSSL
mg/kgmg/kg
1.0
Notes:
SSSL = Site Specific Screening Level as defined by the Brownfields Agreement (BFA)
Only those compounds detected in at least one sample shown above
Bold indicates exceedance of SSSL
Method number follows parameter in parenthesis
Comp = Composite Sample
mg/kg = milligrams per kilogram
Tablle/1
S:\AAA-Master Projects\Bryant Park (BTP-003) Tract IFUpdate 2013\Post-Construction Sampling\Soil Analytical Results7/17/2014 Hart & Hickman, PC

DocuSign Envelope ID: E6518943-A4B0-498F-A5EB-83693863D85B
'41A OWE
JF
� � St�lF a.c: r ':■
ti• Ir*n AV
HSrh ~�A:
P
SITE
y 70
a
... I.:.I [fE )rpfl• - cam-iL
_
12
f�ilwnr[i�
i -
r m8esnceff' p ` T !qs} S
Imo+] '. ti4`
� r _
APPROXIMATE
N 0 2000 4000
SCALE IN FEET
U.S.G.S. QUADRANGLE MAPS
CHARLOTTE WEST, NC 1993
PHOTOREVISED: NO
CHARLOTTE EAST, NC 1967
PHOTOREVISED: 1988
QUADRANGLE
7.5 MINUTE SERIES (TOPOGRAPHIC)

1�1 DocuSign Envelope ID: E6518943-A4B0-498F-A5EB-83693863D85B
0 U
o �

DocuSign Envelope ID: E6518943-A4B0-498F-A5EB-83693863D85B
�o^
00.
rev U
.O� J
O J
w
ILLI O
W W
�w
zaro0�w
O N O
_Z Q
m r7
Z O
�Z� o(.0
12O oOC:?
O��
UZN
_ m
YO Q
J W
4 •9�18 O Q
a_
''^^
U V/
LL
n
Q
•C`O�
n
4
t [! sC t98 U S1
•Sf.A[S
n
�d o ��� ��o •�� W s9!
NCI Y!S'
Z
did �/Nj
Or ,
�r0
(dbd -G/ Nb
Z
of O n o
rlV
h1��h �� gb /vJdy
1 h
J/> S �' 9>N ��1
_No
o
^�
V /��� p�db 9 d ° n 0,9
��O�ySS��NN
o �>>b!!�
W M o
Soa N • X
�bd
O�dpd N��/SNb
z o
�/ o90 9
1
by8�'S'
H
�o�y1bJ/
V y o .9!
S
I
U O
J
J F-
r7 W
60!
O WN (W
w
W
D O — ~ �
OZa- NZO
a
a
r, <
Wpcflo
wQ��OO
ro
OfL�
z
N m_0
19�1�
o
O�m�mM
n d�
�O
J
O
D Q
Ld
�
Y�
0
a
Q
�o
�)
'9SS
�S
�S
S`OA •A
�SlN
fkf
9Fis
s
IL
U

DocuSign Envelope ID: E6518943-A4B0-498F-A5EB-83693863D85B
Radiator Specialty
Notice of Brownfields Property Analytical Tables
Page 1 of 12
Analytical Data
a. Groundwater contaminants (in micrograms per liter, the equivalent of
parts per billion), the standards for which are in Title 15A of the North Carolina
Administrative Code, Subchapter 2L, Rule .0202:
Groundwater
Contaminant
Sample
Location
Date of
Max.
Concentrati
on Sampling
Maximum
Concentrati
on above
Std. (µg/L)
Date of recent
Concentration
Sampling
Recent
Concentration
above Std.
(µg/L)
Standard
(µg/L)
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
MW-5
04/10/02
6.4
01/08/07
<1.0
1.4
1,1-Dichloroethene
MW-3
04/10/02
8.1
01/08/07
<1.0
7
cis-,l2-Dichloroethene
MW-5
04/10/02
390
01/08/07
99
70
Tetrachloroethylene
MW-2
01/0807
15
01/0807
15
0.7
Tetrachloroethylene
MW-3
04/10/02
7.5
01/08/07
<1.0
0.7
Tetrachloroethylene
MW-4
04/10/02
5.7
01/08/07
3.3
0.7
Tetrachloroethylene
MW-5
01/08/07
1.5
01/08/07
1.5
0.7
Trichloroethylene
MW-2
01/0807
13
01/0807
13
2.8
Trichloroethylene
MW-3
04/10/02
15
01/08/07
<2.0
2.8
Trichloroethylene
MW-4
04/10/02
41
01/08/07
18
2.8
Trichloroethylene
MW-5
04/10/02
53
01/08/07
59
2.8
Vinyl chloride
MW-5
04/10/02
150
01/08/07
4.6
0.015
b. Soil contaminants (in milligrams per kilogram, the equivalent of parts per million),
the standards for which are derived using the Guidelines of the Inactive Hazardous
Sites Branch of DENR's Superfund Section:
Soil
Sample
Depth
Date of Max.
Maximum
Concentration
Standard
Contaminant
Sample Area
Location
(ft)
Concentration
above Std.
(mg/kg)
Sampling
mg/kg
Polychlorinated
Tract G
G-TR-1
8-10
01/24/02
14,000
1
Biphenyls
Truck/Rail
PCBs
Tract G
G-TR-7
2-4
04/15/02
4.10
1
Truck/Rail
PCBs
Tract G
G-TR-8
0-2
04/15/02
83
1
Truck/Rail
PCBs
Tract G
G-TR-9
2-4
04/15/02
17.0
1
Truck/Rail
PCBs
Tract G
G-TR-9
10-12
04/15/02
1.8
1
Truck/Rail
PCBs
Tract G
G-B1-TF-3
8-10
04/12/02
12
Tank Farm
PCBs
Tract G
G-B5-TF-
0-2
04/16/02
26,000
1
Tank Farm
1(A)
PCBs
Tract G
G-B5-TF-1
12-16
01/24/02
15
1
Tank Farm

DocuSign Envelope ID: E6518943-A4B0-498F-A5EB-83693863D85B
Radiator Specialty
Notice of Brownfields Property Analytical Tables
Page 2 of 12
Soil
Contaminant
Sample Area
Sample
Location
Depth
(ft)
Date of Max.
Concentration
Sampling
Maximum
Concentration
above Std.
(mg/kg)
Standard
(mg/kg)
PCBs
Tract G
Tank Farm
G-135-
TF 1(A)
18-20
04/16/02
3.1
1
PCBs
Tract G
Tank Farm
G-135-TF-5
12-18
01/24/02
3.2
1
PCBs
Tract G
Tank Farm
G-B5-TF-
5A(D)
12-18
01/24/02
3.6
1
PCBs
Tract G
Tank Farm
G-135-TF-6
2-4
04/16/02
130
1
PCBs
Tract G
Tank Farm
G-135-TF-6
8-12
00/16/02
110
1
PCBs
Tract G
Tank Farm
G-135-TF-7
2-5
04/16/02
93
1
PCB
Tract G
Tank Farm
G-135-TF-8
4-6
4/12/02
1
1
PCBs
Tract G
Tank Farm
G-B5-TF-11
2-4
04/16/02
9.6
1
PCBs
Tract G
Tank Farm
G-135-TF-12
6-8
04/12/02
1.1
1
PCBs
Tract G
N Drum Storage
G-ND-3
2-6
1/22/02
50
1
PCBs
Tract G
E Drum Storage
G-ED-10
2-4
04/15/02
15
1
PCBs
Tract G
E Drum Storage
G-ED-12
2-4
04/15/02
12
1
PCBs
Tract F
Fill Area
TP-7
7
04/22/02
180
1
PCBs
Tract F
Fill Area
TP-8
7
04/22/02
36
1
PCBs
Tract
F-1
3-4
05/17/02
18
1
PCBs
Tract F
F-2
3.5-5
06/11/02
2.3
1
PCBs
Tract G
B-1
3.5-5
06/11/02
1.2
1
PCBs
Tract G
B-2
6.8-
06/11/02
310
1
PCBs
Tract G
G-S-11
3-4
8/30/07
12
1
PCBs
Tract G
G-S-11
9-10
8/30/07
43
1
PCBs
Tract G
G-S-12
1-2
8/30/07
4.6
1
PCBs
Tract G
G-S-12
3-4
8/30/07
2.4
1
PCBs
Tract G
G-S-14
7-8
8/30/07
7.3
1
PCBs
Tract G
G-S-16
2-3
8/31/07
33
1
PCBs
Tract G
G-S-16
9-10
8/31/07
84
1
PCBs
Tract G
G-S-16
14-15
8/31/07
400
1
PCBs
Tract G
G-S-17
1-2
8/30/07
27000
1
PCBs
Tract G
G-S-17
5-6
8/30/07
97000
1

DocuSign Envelope ID: E6518943-A4B0-498F-A5EB-83693863D85B
Radiator Specialty
Notice of Brownfields Property Analytical Tables
Page 3 of 12
Soil
Contaminant
Sample Area
Sample
Location
Depth
(ft)
Date of Max.
Concentration
Sampling
Maximum
Concentration
above Std.
(mg/kg)
Standard
(mg/kg)
PCBs
Tract G
G-S-17
9-10
8/30/07
170
1
PCBs
Tract G
G-S-25
1-2
8/31/07
18000
1
PCBs
Tract G
G-S-25
4-5
8/31/07
250
1
PCBs
Tract G
G-S-25
9-10
8/31/07
17
1
PCBs
Tract G
G-S-26
2-3
8/29/07
5.2
1
PCBs
Tract G
G-S-27
1-2
8/30/07
150
1
PCBs
Tract G
G-S-27
5-6
8/30/07
120
1
PCBs
Tract G
G-S-28
1-2
8/31/07
9.7
1
PCBs
Tract G
G-S-31
1-2
8/31/07
50
1
PCBs
Tract G
G-S-34
1-2
10/11/07
2700
1
PCBs
Tract G
G-S-34
4-5
10/11/07
22
1
PCBs
Tract G
G-S-34
7-8
10/11/07
18
1
PCBs
Tract G
G-S-35
1-2
10/11/07
320
1
PCBs
Tract G
G-S-35
4.5-5.5
10/11/07
17
1
PCBs
Tract G
G-S-35
7-8
10/11/07
18
1
PCB
Tract F
F-S-4
2-3
09/05/07
98
1
PCB
Tract F
F-S-5
2-3
09/05/07
4.0
1
PCB
Tract F
F-S-6
2-3
09/05/07
45
1
PCB
Tract F
F-S-10
4-5
09/05/07
2600
1
PCB
Tract F
F-S-13
2-3
09/06/07
19
1
PCB
Tract F
F-S-13
6-7
09/06/07
1.9
1
PCB
Tract F
F-S-15
2-3
09/06/07
2.6
1
PCB
Tract F
F-S-17
2-3
09/06/07
13
1
Date of Max.
Maximum
Standar
Soil
Sample Area
Sample
Depth
Concentration
Concentration
d
Contaminant
Location
Sampling
above Std.
(mg/kg)
(mg/kg)
Benzene
Tract G
G-B1-BO-2
8-10
01/24/02
6.4
0.64
Boiler Area
Benzene
Tract G
G-B1-TF-1(A)
4-6
04/12/02
3.1
0.64
Tank Farm
Benzene
Tract G
G-B1-TF-1
14-16
01/25/02
5.7
0.64
Tank Farm
Benzene
Tract G
G-B5-TF-1(A)
18-20
04/16/02
3.2
0.64
Tank Farm
Benzene
Tract G
G-B5-TF-7
2-5
04/16/02
34
0.64
Tank Farm
Benzene
Tract G
G-B5-TF-8
4-6
04/12/02
1.3
0.64
Tank Farm
Benzene
Tract G
I G-B5-TF-8
1 14-16
1 04/12/02
1 580
1 0.64

DocuSign Envelope ID: E6518943-A4B0-498F-A5EB-83693863D85B
Radiator Specialty
Notice of Brownfields Property Analytical Tables
Page 4 of 12
Date of Max.
i Maxmum
Standar
Soil
Sample Area
Sample
Depth
Concentration
Concentration
d
Contaminant
Location
Sampling
above Std.
(m /k
g g)
m / k
Tank Farm
Benzene
Tract G
G-B5-TF-11
2-4
04/16/02
6.8
0.64
Tank Farm
Benzene
Tract G
G-B5-TF-11
10-12
04/16/02
28
0.64
Tank Farm
Benzene
Tract G
G-S-16
7-9
08/31/07
7.4
0.64
Benzene
Tract G
G-S-28
14-15
08/31/07
40
0.64
Benzene
Tract G
G-S-33
9-10
08/31/07
290
0.64
Chlorobenzene
Tract G
G-B1-BO-2
8-10
01/24/02
210
30
Boiler Area
Chlorobenzene
Tract G
G-B5-TF-7
2-5
04/16/02
34
30
Tank Farm
Chlorobenzene
Tract G
G-B5-TF-8
4-6
04/12/02
31
30
Tank Farm
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
Tract G
G-B1-BO-2
8-10
01/24/02
65
3.4
Boiler Area
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
Tract G
G-Bl-TF-1
14-16
01/25/02
5.7
3.4
Tank Farm
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
Tract G
G-B5-TF-7
2-5
04/16/02
34
3.4
Tank Farm
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
Tract G
G-B5-TF-8
4-6
04/12/02
31
3.4
Tank Farm
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
Tract G
G-B5-TF-11
2-4
04/16/02
25
3.4
Tank Farm
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
Tract G
G-B5-TF-11
10-12
04/16/02
28
3.4
Tank Farm
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
Tract G
G-S-14
8-10
08/30/07
19
3.4
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
Tract G
G-S-16
7-9
08/31/07
6.2
3.4
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
Tract G
G-S-28
14-15
08/31/07
4.8
3.4
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
Tract G
G-B5-TF-7
2-5
04/16/02
34
8.6
Tank Farm
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
Tract G
G-B5-TF-8
4-6
04/12/02
31
8.6
Tank Farm
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
Tract G
G-B5-TF-11
10-12
04/16/02
28
8.6
Tank Farm
trans-1,2-
Tract G
G-B5-TF-7
2-5
04/16/02
34
13.8
Dichloroethene
Tank Farm
trans-1,2-
Tract G
G-B5-TF-8
4-6
04/12/02
31
13.8
Dichloroethene
Tank Farm
trans-1,2-
Tract G
G-B5-TF-11
10-12
04/16/02
28
13.8
Dichloroethene
Tank Farm
Ethylbenzene
Tract F
F-S-29
9-10
09/07/07
1100
380
Ethylbenzene
Tract G
G-S-28
14-15
08/31/07
380
380
Isopropyl benzene
Tract G
G-B5-TF-3
6-8
01/24/02
520
114
(Cumene)
Tank Farm

DocuSign Envelope ID: E6518943-A4B0-498F-A5EB-83693863D85B
Radiator Specialty
Notice of Brownfields Property Analytical Tables
Page 5 of 12
Date of Max.
i Maxmum
Standar
Soil
Sample Area
Sample
Depth
Concentration
Concentration
d
Contaminant
Location
Sampling
above Std.
(m /k
g g)
m / k
Naphthalene
Tract G
G-B1-BO-2
8-10
01/24/02
32
11.2
Boiler Area
Naphthalene
Tract G
G-Bl-TF-1
14-16
01/25/02
97
11.2
Tank Farm
Naphthalene
Tract G
G-B5-TF-7
2-5
04/16/02
46
11.2
Tank Farm
Naphthalene
Tract G
G-B5-TF-8
4-6
04/12/02
69
11.2
Tank Farm
Naphthalene
Tract G
G-B5-TF-8
14-16
04/12/02
68
11.2
Tank Farm
Naphthalene
Tract G
G-B5-TF-11
10-12
04/16/02
28
11.2
Tank Farm
Naphthalene
Tract F
F-S-27
12-13
09/07/07
14
11.2
Naphthalene
Tract F
F-S-29
9-10
09/07/07
22
11.2
Naphthalene
Tract G
G-S-14
8-10
08/30/07
30
11.2
Naphthalene
Tract G
G-S-28
14-15
08/31/07
390
11.2
Naphthalene
Tract G
G-S-33
9-10
08/31/07
78
11.2
Tetrahydrofuran
Tract G
G-B5-TF-11
10-12
04/16/02
28
9.4
Tank Farm
Tetrahydrofuran
Tract G
G-B9-D-1
14-16
01/21/02
260
9.4
Building 9
Tetrahydrofuran
Tract G
G-B9-D-1(A)
4-6
04/11/02
20
9.4
Building 9
Tetrahydrofuran
Tract G
G-B9-D-4
4-6
04/11/02
150
9.4
Building 9
Tetrachloroethylene
Tract G
G-B1-BO-2
8-10
01/24/02
6.4
0.48
Boiler Area
Tetrachloroethylene
Tract G
G-B1-TF-1(A)
4-6
04/12/02
3.1
0.48
Tank Farm
Tetrachloroethylene
Tract G
G-B1-TF-1
14-16
01/25/02
5.7
0.48
Tank Farm
Tetrachloroethylene
Tract G
G-B5-TF-1(A)
18-20
04/16/02
3.2
0.48
Tank Farm
Tetrachloroethylene
Tract G
G-B5-TF-6
8-12
04/16/02
0.56
0.48
Tank Farm
Tetrachloroethylene
Tract G
G-B5-TF-7
2-5
04/16/02
34
0.48
Tank Farm
Tetrachloroethylene
Tract G
G-B5-TF-8
4-6
04/12/02
1.3
0.48
Tank Farm
Tetrachloroethylene
Tract G
G-B5-TF-8
14-16
04/12/02
31
0.48
Tank Farm
Tetrachloroethylene
Tract G
G-B5-TF-11
2-4
04/16/02
6.8
0.48
Tank Farm
Tetrachloroethylene
Tract G
G-B5-TF-11
10-12
04/16/02
28
0.48

DocuSign Envelope ID: E6518943-A4B0-498F-A5EB-83693863D85B
Radiator Specialty
Notice of Brownfields Property Analytical Tables
Page 6 of 12
Date of Max.
i Maxmum
Standar
Soil
Sample Area
Sample
Depth
Concentration
Concentration
d
Contaminant
Location
Sampling
above Std.
(m /k
g g)
m / k
Tank Farm
Tetrachloroethylene
Tract F
F-S-27
12-13
09/07/07
0.77
0.48
Toluene
Tract G
G-B5-TF-8
14-16
04/12/02
2700
132
Tank Farm
Toluene
Tract G
G-S-33
9-10
08/31/07
970
Total Xylenes
Tract G
G-Bl-TF-1(A)
4-6
04/12/02
150
54
Tank Farm
Total Xylenes
Tract G
G-Bl-TF-1
14-16
01/25/02
720
54
Tank Farm
Total Xylenes
Tract G
G-B5-TF-1(A)
18-20
04/16/02
230
54
Tank Farm
Total Xylenes
Tract G
G-B5-TF-7
2-5
04/16/02
260
54
Tank Farm
Total Xylenes
Tract G
G-B5-TF-8
14-16
04/12/02
730
54
Tank Farm
Total Xylenes
Tract G
G-B5-TF-11
2-4
04/16/02
110
54
Tank Farm
Total Xylenes
Tract G
G-B5-TF-11
10-12
04/16/02
840
54
Tank Farm
Total Xylenes
Tract G
G-ND-3
2-6
01/22/02
360
54
Drum Storage
Total Xylenes
Tract F
F-S-29
9-10
09/07/07
7800
54
Total Xylenes
Tract G
G-S-16
7-9
08/31/07
96
54
Total Xylenes
Tract G
G-S-28
14-15
08/31/07
1020
54
Total Xylenes
Tract G
G-S-33
9-10
08/31/07
1060
54
Trichloroethylene
Tract E
E-MD-D-1
2-4
01/23/02
0.13
0.053
Trichloroethylene
Tract G
G-Bl-BO-1
14-16
01/24/02
0.64
0.053
Boiler Area
Trichloroethylene
Tract G
G-B1-BO-2
8-10
01/24/02
6.4
0.053
Boiler Area
Trichloroethylene
Tract G
G-Bl-TF-1(A)
4-6
04/12/02
3.1
0.053
Tank Farm
Trichloroethylene
Tract G
G-Bl-TF-I
14-16
01/25/02
5.7
0.053
Tank Farm
Trichloroethylene
Tract G
G-TR-1
8-10
01/24/02
0.12
0.053
Truck/Rail
Trichloroethylene
Tract G
G-B5-TF-1(A)
18-20
04/16/02
3.2
0.053
Tank Farm
Trichloroethylene
Tract G
G-B5-TF-3
6-8
01/24/02
0.12
0.053
Tank Farm
Trichloroethylene
Tract G
G-B5-TF-4
8-10
01/24/02
0.12
0.053
Tank Farm
Trichloroethylene
Tract G
I G-B6-TF-6
8-12
04/16/02
0.56
0.053

DocuSign Envelope ID: E6518943-A4B0-498F-A5EB-83693863D85B
Radiator Specialty
Notice of Brownfields Property Analytical Tables
Page 7 of 12
Date of Max.
i Maxmum
Standar
Soil
Sample Area
Sample
Depth
Concentration
Concentration
d
Contaminant
Location
Sampling
above Std.
(m /k
g g)
m / k
Tank Farm
Trichloroethylene
Tract G
G-B5-TF-7
>
04/16/02
34
0.053
Tank Farm
Trichloroethylene
Tract G
G-135-TF-8
4-6
04/12/02
1.3
0.053
Tank Farm
Trichloroethylene
Tract G
G-135-TF-8
14-16
04/12/02
31
0.053
Tank Farm
Trichloroethylene
Tract G
G-135-TF-10
2-4
04/16/02
0.65
0.053
Tank Farm
Trichloroethylene
Tract G
G-B5-TF-11
2-4
04/16/02
6.8
0.053
Tank Farm
Trichloroethylene
Tract G
G-135-TF-11
10-12
04/16/02
28
0.053
Tank Farm
Trichloroethylene
Tract G
G-ND-3
2-6
01/22/02
0.605
0.053
N. Drum Storage
Trichloroethylene
Tract G
G-B9-D-1
14-16
01/21/02
0.065
0.053
Building 9
Trichloroethylene
Tract G
G-ED-1
6-10
01/24/02
2.5
0.053
E Drum Storage
Trichloroethylene
Tract G
G-ED-3(A)
0-4
04/15/02
0.061
0.053
E Drum Storage
Trichloroethylene
Tract G
G-ED-5
2-4
04/15/02
0.067
0.053
E Drum Storage
Trichloroethylene
Tract G
G-ED-9
2-4
04/15/02
0.1
0.053
E Drum Storage
Trichloroethylene
Tract F
F-S-25
7-8
09/07/07
0.11
0.053
Trichloroethylene
Tract F
F-S-27
12-13
09/07/07
L.7
0.053
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
Tract G
G-B5-TF-7
2-5
04/16/02
34
12.4
Tank Farm
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
Tract G
G-135-TF-8
14-16
04/12/02
31
12.4
Tank Farm
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
Tract G
G-B5-TF-11
10-12
04/16/02
28
12.4
Tank Farm
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
Tract F
F-S-29
9-10
09/07/07
21
12.4
1,2,4-
Tract G
G-B1-TF-1
14-16
01/25/02
53
52
Trimethylbenzene
Tank Farm
1,3,5-
Tract G
G-B1-TF-I
14-16
01/25/02
29
21
Trimethylbenzene
Tank Farm
1,3,5-
Tract G
G-135-TF-1(A)
18-20
04/16/02
23
21
Trimethylbenzene
Tank Farm
1,3,5-
Tract G
G-B5-TF-7
2-5
04/16/02
34
21
Trimethylbenzene
Tank Farm
1,3,5-
Tract G
G-B5-TF-8
4-6
04/12/02
31
21
Trimethylbenzene
Tank Farm

DocuSign Envelope ID: E6518943-A4B0-498F-A5EB-83693863D85B
Radiator Specialty
Notice ofBrownfields Property Analytical Tables
Page 8 of 12
Date of Max.
i Maxmum
Standar
Soil
Sample Area
Sample
Depth
Concentration
Concentration
d
Contaminant
Location
Sampling
above Std.
(m /k
g g)
m /k
1,3,5-
Tract G
G-B5-TF-11
2-4
04/16/02
41
21
Trimethylbenzene
Tank Farm
1,3,5-
Tract G
G-B5-TF-11
10-12
04/16/02
37
21
Trimethylbenzene
Tank Farm
1,3,5-
Tract G
G-S-28
14-15
08/31/07
99
21
Trimethylbenzene
Benzo(a)anthracene
Tract F
TP-7
7
04/22/02
0.46
0.022
Fill Area
Benzo(a)anthracene
Tract F
TP-8
7
04/22/02
1.2
0.022
Fill Area
Benzo(a)anthracene
B-1
3.5-5
06/11/02
2
0.022
Benzo(a)anthracene
Tract G
G-B1-BO-4
1-2
04/22/02
2.4
0.022
Boiler Area
Benzo(a)anthracene
Tract G
G-B1-TF-3
8-10
04/12/02
0.41
0.022
Tank Farm
Benzo(a)anthracene
Tract G
G-B8-AST-4
2-4
04/11/02
0.82
0.022
AST Area
Benzo(a)anthracene
Tract G
G-B9-UST-2
8-10
01/22/02
0.47
0.022
UST AREA
Benzo(a)anthracene
Tract G
G-ED-1
6-10
01/24/02
0.54
0.022
E Drum Storage
Benzo(a)anthracene
Tract G
G-ED-7
2-4
04/15/02
17
0.022
E Drum Storage
Benzo(a)anthracene
Tract G
G-ED-9
2-4
04/15/02
41
0.022
E Drum Storage
Benzo(a)anthracene
Tract G
G-ED-9
8-10
04/15/02
1.8
0.022
E Drum Storage
Benzo(a)anthracene
Tract G
G-ED-11
0-2
04/15/02
1.4
0.022
E Drum Storage
Benzo(a)anthracene
Tract G
G-ED-12
10-12
04/15/02
0.47
0.022
E Drum Storage
Benzo(a)anthracene
Tract F
F-S-5
6-7
09/05/07
5.1
0.022
Benzo(a)anthracene
Tract F
F-S-15
19-20
09/06/07
0.55
0.022
Benzo(a)anthracene
Tract F
F-S-20
14-15
09/06/07
0.60
0.022
Benzo(a)anthracene
Tract F
F-S-23
6-7
09/07/07
1.2
0.022
Benzo(a)anthracene
Tract F
F-S-25
7-8
09/07/07
1.6
0.022
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
Tract F
TP-7
7
04/22/02
0.68
0.22
Fill Area
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
Tract F
TP-8
7
04/22/02
1.7
0.22
Fill Area
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
Tract G
G-B1-BO-4
1-2
04/22/02
3.4
0.22
Boiler Area
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
Tract G
G-TR-7
2-4
04/15/02
0.85
0.22
Truck/Rail

DocuSign Envelope ID: E6518943-A4B0-498F-A5EB-83693863D85B
Radiator Specialty
Notice of Brownfields Property Analytical Tables
Page 9 of 12
Date of Max.
i Maxmum
Standar
Soil
Sample Area
Sample
Depth
Concentration
Concentration
d
Contaminant
Location
Sampling
above Std.
(m /k
g g)
m /k
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
Tract G
G-TR-8
0.2
04/15/02
0.79
0.22
Truck/Rail
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
Tract G
G-B8-AST-4
2-4
04/11/02
0.75
0.22
AST Area
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
Tract G
G-B9-UST-2
8-10
01/22/02
0.45
0.22
UST Area
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
Tract G
G-ED-1
6-10
01/24/02
0.54
0.22
E Drum Storage
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
Tract G
G-ED-3(A)
0-4
04/15/02
0.41
0.22
E Drum Storage
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
Tract G
G-ED-7
2-4
04/15/02
12
0.22
E Drum Storage
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
Tract G
G-ED-9
2-4
04/15/02
35
0.22
E Drum Storage
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
Tract G
G-ED-9
8-10
04/15/02
1.5
0.22
E Drum Storage
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
Tract G
G-ED-11
0-2
04/15/02
2.6
0.22
E Drum Storage
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
Tract G
G-ED-12
10-12
04/15/02
0.52
0.22
E Drum Storage
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
Tract F
F-S-5
6-7
09/05/07
4.6
0.22
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
Tract F
F-S-15
19-20
09/06/07
0.67
0.22
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
Tract F
F-S-20
14-15
09/06/07
0.57
0.22
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
Tract F
F-S-23
6-7
09/07/07
1.1
0.22
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
Tract F
F-S-25
7-8
09/07/07
1.5
0.22
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
Tract G
G-B1-BO-4
1-2
04/22/02
2.6
2.2
Boiler Area
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
Tract G
G-ED-7
2-4
04/15/02
4
2.2
E Drum Storage
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
Tract G
G-ED-9
2-4
04/15/02
23
2.2
E Drum Storage
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
Tract F
F-S-5
6-7
09/07/07
4.3
2.2
Benzo(a)pyrene
Tract F
TP-7
7
04/22/02
0.77
0.022
Fill Area
Benzo(a)pyrene
Tract F
TP-8
7
04/22/02
2
0.022
Fill Area
Benzo(a)pyrene
Tract G
G-B1-BO-4
1-2
04/22/02
3.7
0.022
Boiler Area
Benzo(a)pyrene
Tract G
G-TR-7
2-4
04/15/02
1.1
0.022
Truck/Rail
Benzo(a)pyrene
Tract G
G-TR-8
0.2
04/15/02
0.64
0.022
Truck/Rail
Benzo(a)pyrene
Tract g
G-B8-AST-4
2-4
04/11/02
1
0.022
AST Area
1
j

DocuSign Envelope ID: E6518943-A4B0-498F-A5EB-83693863D85B
Radiator Specialty
Notice ofBrownfields Property Analytical Tables
Page 10 of 12
Date of Max.
i Maxmum
Standar
Soil
Sample Area
Sample
Depth
Concentration
Concentration
d
Contaminant
Location
Sampling
above Std.
(m /k
g g)
m /k
Benzo(a)pyrene
Tract G
G-B9-UST-2
5-10
01/22/02
0.42
0.022
UST Area
Benzo(a)pyrene
Tract G
G-ED-1
6-10
01/24/02
0.78
0.022
E Drum Storage
Benzo(a)pyrene
Tract G
G-ED-3(A)
0-4
04/15/02
0.42
0.022
E Drum Storage
Benzo(a)pyrene
Tract G
G-ED-5
2-4
04/15/02
0.44
0.022
E Drum Storage
Benzo(a)pyrene
Tract G
G-ED-7
2-4
04/15/02
9
0.022
E Drum Storage
Benzo(a)pyrene
Tract G
G-ED-9
2-4
04/15/02
42
0.022
E Drum Storage
Benzo(a)pyrene
Tract G
G-ED-9
8-10
04/15/02
1.5
0.022
E Drum Storage
Benzo(a)pyrene
Tract G
G-ED-11
0-2
04/15/02
3
0.022
E Drum Storage
Benzo(a)pyrene
Tract G
G-ED-12
10-12
04/15/02
0.56
0.022
E Drum Storage
Benzo(a)pyrene
Tract F
F-S-5
6-7
09/05/07
2.9
0.022
Benzo(a)pyrene
Tract F
F-S-15
19-20
09/06/07
0.60
0.022
Benzo(a)pyrene
Tract F
F-S-20
14-15
09/06/07
0.49
0.022
Benzo(a)pyrene
Tract F
F-S-23
6-7
09/07/07
0.99
0.022
Benzo(a)pyrene
Tract F
F-S-25
7-8
09/07/07
1.2
0.022
Benzo(a)pyrene
Tract F
F-S-29
15-16
09/07/07
0.41
0.022
Chrysene
Tract G
G-ED-9
2-4
04/15/02
43
22
E Drum Storage
Dibenzo(ah)anthracene
Tract F
TP-8
7
06/11/02
0.41
0.022
Fill Area
Dibenzo(ah)anthracene
Tract G
G-B1-BO-4
1-2
04/22/02
1.1
0.022
Boiler Area
Dibenzo(ah)anthracene
Tract G
G-ED-7
2-4
04/15/02
1.7
0.022
E Drum Storage
Dibenzo(ah)anthracene
Tract G
G-ED-9
2-4
04/15/02
12
0.022
E Drum Storage
Dibenzo(ah)anthracene
Tract G
G-ED-9
8-10
04/15/02
0.44
0.022
E Drum Storage
Dibenzo(ah)anthracene
Tract G
G-ED-11
0-2
04/15/02
0.7
0.022
E Drum Storage
Dibenzo(ah)anthracene
Tract F
F-S-5
6-7
09/07/07
1.2
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
Tract G
G-B5-TF-11
2-4
04/16/02
370
220
Tank Farm
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
Tract G
B-1
6.-8
06/11/02
4
3.4
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
Tract G
G-B1-BO-2
8-10
01/24/02
41
3.4

DocuSign Envelope ID: E6518943-A4B0-498F-A5EB-83693863D85B
Radiator Specialty
Notice ofBrownfields Property Analytical Tables
Page 11 of 12
Date of Max.
i Maxmum
Standar
Soil
Sample Area
Sample
Depth
Concentration
Concentration
d
Contaminant
Location
Sampling
above Std.
(m /k
g g)
m / k
Boiler Area
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
Tract G
G-Bl-TF-I
14-16
01/25/02
7
3.4
Tank Farm
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
Tract G
G-TR-1
8-10
01/24/02
7.6
3.4
Truck/Rail
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
Tract G
G-TR-9
2-4
04/16/02
4.2
3.4
Truck/Rail
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
Tract G
G-B5-TF-1(A)
0-2
04/16/02
10
3.4
Tank Farm
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
Tract G
G-B5-TF-6
2-4
04/16/02
4
3.4
Tank Farm
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
Tract G
G-B5-TF-6
8-12
04/16/02
3.7
3.4
Tank Farm
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
Tract G
G-B5-TF-8
14-16
04/12/02
4.2
3.4
Tank Farm
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
Tract G
G-B5-TF-10
2-4
04/16/02
4.4
3.4
Tank Farm
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
Tract G
G-B5-TF-11
2-4
04/16/02
19
3.4
Tank Farm
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
Tract G
G-ED-9
2-4
04/15/02
4.1
3.4
E Drum Storage
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene
Tract F
TP-7
7
04/22/02
0.66
0.22
Fill Area
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene
Tract F
TP-8
7
04/22/02
1.7
0.22
Fill Area
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene
Tract G
G-B1-BO-4
1-2
04/22/02
3.6
0.22
Boiler Area
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene
Tract G
G-TR-7
2-4
04/15/02
1.2
0.22
Truck/Rail
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene
Tract G
G-TR-8
0.2
04/15/02
0.98
0.22
Truck/Rail
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene
Tract G
G-ED-1
6-10
01/24/02
0.74
0.22
E Drum Storage
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene
Tract G
G-ED-3(A)
0-4
04/15/02
0.52
0.22
E Drum Storage
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene
Tract G
G-ED-7
2-4
04/15/02
3.9
0.22
E Drum Storage
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene
Tract G
G-ED-9
2-4
04/15/02
27
0.22
E Drum Storage
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene
Tract G
G-ED-9
8-10
04/15/02
1
0.22
E Drum Storage
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene
Tract G
G-ED-11
0-2
04/15/02
2.8
0.22
E Drum Storage
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene
Tract G
I G-ED-12
1 10-12
04/15/02
0.56
0.22

DocuSign Envelope ID: E6518943-A4B0-498F-A5EB-83693863D85B
Radiator Specialty
Notice ofBrownfields Property Analytical Tables
Page 12 of 12
Date of Max.
i Maxmum
Standar
Soil
Sample Area
Sample
Depth
Concentration
Concentration
d
Contaminant
Location
Sampling
above Std.
(m /k
g g)
m /k
E Drum Storage
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene
Tract F
F-S-5
6-7
09/07/07
3.4
0.22
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene
Tract F
F-S-23
6-7
09/07/07
0.81
0.22
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene
Tract F
F-S-25
7-8
09/07/07
0.66
0.22
2-Methyl -naphthalene
Tract G
G-B1-BO-2A
6-8
04/16/02
21
11.2
Boiler Area
2-Methyl -naphthalene
Tract G
G-B1-BO-2
8-10
01/24/02
46
11.2
Boiler Area
2-Methyl -naphthalene
Tract G
G-B1-BO-6
6-8
04/16/02
39
11.2
Boiler Area
2-Methyl -naphthalene
Tract G
G-B5-TF-3
6-8
01/24/02
14
11.2
Tank Farm
2-Methyl -naphthalene
Tract G
G-B5-TF-7
2-5
04/16/02
13
11.2
Tank Farm
2-Methyl -naphthalene
Tract G
G-S-28
14-15
08/31/07
16
11.2
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
Tract G
G-TR-1
8-10
04/12/02
26
12.4
Truck/Rail
Vinyl Chloride
Tract F
F-S-23
6-7
09/07/07
0.18
0.079
Vinyl Chloride
Tract F
F-S-25
7-8
09/07/07
0.14
0.079