22002_Overture Cary_EMP_20190509

NORTH CAROLINA BROWNFIELDS PROGRAM
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN
This form is to be used to prepare an Environmental Management Plan (EMP) for projects in
the North Carolina Brownfields Program at the direction of a Brownfields project manager.
The EMP is a typical requirement of a Brownfields Agreement (BFA). Its purpose is to clarify
actions to be taken during the demolition and construction at Brownfields properties in an
effort to avoid delays in the event of the discovery of new contamination sources or other
environmental conditions. The EMP provides a means to document redevelopment plans and
environmental data for each applicable environmental medium to inform regulatory -compliant
decision -making at the site. As much detail as possible should be included in the EMP,
including contingency planning for unknowns. Consult your project manager if you have
questions.
Prospective Developers and/or their consultants must complete and submit this form and all
pertinent attachments, see checklist below, to their Brownfields project manager prior to any
earthmoving or other development -related activities that have the potential to disturb soil at
the Brownfields Property, including demolition. For the resultant EMP to be valid for use, it
must be completed, reviewed by the program, signed by all parties working on the project,
and approved by the Brownfields project manager. Failure to comply with the requirements of
the EMP could jeopardize project eligibility, or in the event of a completed agreement, be
cause for a reopener
So that the EMP provides value in protecting brownfields eligibility and public health, the
preparer shall ensure that the following steps have been completed prior to submitting the
EMP for review. Any EMP prepared without completing these steps is premature.
® Site sampling and assessment that meets Brownfields' objectives is complete and has
been reviewed and approved by the Brownfields Project Manager.
® Specific redevelopment plans, even if conceptual, have been developed for the project,
submitted and reviewed by the Brownfields Project Manager.
EMP Version 2, June 2018

Please submit, along with the completed EMP form, the following attachments, as relevant
and applicable to the proposed redevelopment:
® A set of redevelopment plans, including architectural/engineering plans, if available; if
not conceptual plans may suffice if updated when detailed plans are drafted.
® A figure overlaying redevelopment plans on a map of the extent of contamination for
each media.
® Site grading plans that include a cut and fill analysis.
❑ A figure showing the proposed location and depth of impacted soil that would remain
on site after construction grading.
® Any necessary permits for redevelopment (i.e. demolition, etc.).
® A detailed construction schedule that includes timing and phases of construction.
® Tabulated data summaries for each impacted media (i.e. soil, groundwater, soil gas,
etc.) applicable to the proposed redevelopment.
® Figures with the sampling locations and contamination extents for each impacted media
applicable to the proposed redevelopment.
❑ A full final grade sampling and analysis plan, if the redevelopment plan is final.
❑ If known, information about each proposed potential borrow soil source, such as aerial
photos, historic site maps, historic Sanborn maps, a site history, necessary for
brownfields approval.
❑ Information and, analytical data if required, for quarries, or other borrow sources,
detailing the type of material proposed for importation to the Brownfields Property.
❑ A work plan for the sampling and analysis of soil to be brought onto the Brownfields
Property. Refer to Issue Resolution 15 in Brownfields Program Guidelines.
❑ A map of the Brownfields Property showing the location of soils proposed for export
and sampling data from those areas.
❑ If a Vapor Mitigation System is required by the Brownfields Program, the Vapor
Intrusion Mitigation System (VIMS) plan will be signed and sealed by a NC Professional
Engineer. The VIMS Plan may also be submitted under separate cover.
EMP Version 2, June 2018

GENERAL INFORMATION
Date: 5/9/2019 Revision Date (if applicable): Click or tap to enter a date.
Brownfields Assigned Project Name: Overture Cary
Brownfields Project Number: 22002-18-092
Brownfields Property Address: 3612 & 3624 Davis Drive, Cary and Morrisville, North Carolina
Brownfields Property Area (acres): 6.93
Is Brownfields Property Subject to RCRA Permit? ....................... ❑ Yes © No
If yes enter Permit No.: LOP e to enter text.
Is Brownfields Property Subject to a Solid Waste Permit............ ❑ Yes © No
If yes, enter Permit No.: Click or tap here to enter text.
COMMUNICATIONS
A copy of this EMP shall be distributed to all the parties below as well as any contractors or site workers
that may be exposed to site vapors, soil, groundwater, and/or surface water. Additionally, a copy of the
EMP shall be maintained at the Brownfields Property during redevelopment activities. NOTE, THE EMP
DOES NOT TAKE THE PLACE OF A SITE -SPECIFIC HEALTH AND SAFETY PLAN.
Prospective Developer (PD): CRP-GREP Overture Cary Owner, L.L.C.
Contact Person: Robert Morgan
Phone Numbers: Office: 843-576-5762 Mobile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Contractor for PD: Greystar Development & Construction
Contact Person: Chris Hustek
Phone Numbers: Office: 704-944-9144
Email: [e-mail]
Environmental Consultant: Mid -Atlantic Associates, Inc.
Contact Person: Dan Nielsen
Phone Numbers: Office: 919-250-9918
Email: [e-mail]
Brownfields Program Project Manager: Kelly Johnson, LG
Phone Numbers: Office: 919-707-8279
Email: [e-mail]
Mobile: [phone]
Mobile: [phone]
Mobile: Click or tap here to enter text.
Other DEQ Program Contacts (if applicable, i.e., UST Section, Inactive Hazardous Site Branch,
3
EMP Version 2, June 2018

Hazardous Waste, Solid Waste):
l ICK or tap nere to enter text.
NOTIFICATIONS TO THE BROWNFIELDS PROGRAM
Written advance Notification Times to Brownfields Project Manager: Check each box to accept
minimum advance notice periods (in calendar days) for each type of onsitetask:
On -site assessment or remedial activities: .................................................... 10 days Prior
Construction or grading start: .......................................................................... 10 days Prior
Discovery of stained soil, odors, USTs, buried drums or waste, landfill, or other signs of previously
unknown contamination: ................................................................................ Within 48 hours
Implementation of emergency actions (e.g. dewatering, flood or soil erosion control measures in
area of contamination, ventilation of work zones): ................................... Within 48 hours
Installation of mitigation systems: ................................................................ 10 days Prior
IK
Other notifications as required by local, state or federal agencies toimplement redevelopment
activities: (as applicable): ................................................................................. Within 30 days
REDEVELOPMENT PLANS
1) Type of Redevelopment (check all that apply):
®Residential ❑Recreational ❑Institutional ❑Commercial ❑Office ❑Retail ❑ Industrial
El Other specify:
Click or tap here to enter text.
2) Check the following activities that will be conducted prior to commencing earth -moving activities
at the site:
® Review of historic maps (Sanborn Maps, facility maps)
❑ Conducting geophysical surveys to evaluate the location of suspect UST, fuel lines, utility
lines, etc.
© Interviews with employees/former employees/facility managers/neighbors
3) Summary of Redevelopment Plans (MANDATORY: attach detailed plans or conceptual plans, if
detailed plans are not available. EMP review without such information would be premature):
Provide brief summary of redevelopment plans, including demolition, removal of building
slabs/pavement, grading plans and planned construction of new structures:
Select portions of the redevelopment plans including grading plans are attached. Demolition
4
EMP Version 2, June 2018

activities will be conducted to remove one residential structure on the subject site. In general,
the southeast portion of the site will be cut and the northwest portion will be filled. The site will
be redeveloped with an apartment building catering to residence 55 years old and older.
4) Do plans include demolition of structure(s)?:
® Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
® If yes, please check here to confirm that demolition will be conducted in accordance with
applicable legal requirements, including without limitation those related to lead and asbestos
abatement that are administered by the Health Hazards Control Unit within the Division of Public
Health of the North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services. If available, please
provide a copy of your demolition permit.
5) Are sediment and erosion control measures required by federal, state, or local regulations?
® Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
® If yes, please check here to confirm that demolition will be conducted in accordance with
applicable legal requirements. If soil disturbance is necessary to install sediment and erosion
control measures, they may not begin until this EMP is approved.
6) Which category of risk -based screening level is used or is anticipated to be specified in the
Brownfields Agreement? Note: If children frequent the property, residential screening levels shall
be cited in the Brownfields Agreement for comparison purposes.
® Residential ❑ Non -Residential or Industrial/Commercial
7) Schedule for Redevelopment (attach construction schedule):
a) Construction start date: 5/10/2019
b) Anticipated duration (specify activities during each phase):
20 months
c) Additional phases planned? ❑ Yes ❑ No
If yes, specify the start date and/or activities if known:
Start Date: Click or tap to enter a date.
Planned Activity:
Click or tap here to enter text.
Start Date: Click or tap to enter a date.
Planned Activity:
Click or tap here to enter text.
Start Date: Click or tap to enter a date.
Planned Activity:
Click or tap here to enter text.
d) Provide the planned date of occupancy for new buildings: 11/10/2020
5
EMP Version 2, June 2018

CONTAMINATED MEDIA
1) Contaminated Media on the Brownfields Property
Part 1. Soil: ..............................................................
®
Yes
❑ No
❑ Suspected
Part 2. Groundwater: ............................................
❑
Yes
® No
❑ Suspected
Part 3. Surface Water: ..........................................
❑
Yes
® No
❑ Suspected
Part 4. Sediment: ...................................................
❑
Yes
® No
❑ Suspected
Part 5. Soil Vapor: ..................................................
❑
Yes
® No
❑ Suspected
Part 6. Sub -Slab Soil Vapor: ..................................
❑
Yes
© No
❑ Suspected
Part 7. Indoor Air: ...................................................
❑
Yes
® No
❑ Suspected
2) For the Area of Proposed Redevelopment on the Brownfields Property, attach tabulated data
summaries for each impacted media and figure(s) with sample locations.
PART 1. Soil — Please fill out the information below, using detailed site plans, if available, or estimate
using known areas of contaminated soil and a conceptual redevelopment plan. Provide a figure
overlaying new construction onto figure showing contaminated soil and groundwater locations.
1) Known or suspected contaminants in soil (list general groups of contaminants):
Petroleum
2) Depth of known or suspected contaminants (feet):
Estimated 5 feet
3) Area of soil disturbed by redevelopment (square feet):
Entire site, 7 acres or 300,000 sf
4) Depths of soil to be excavated (feet):
Maximum, 8.5 feet
5) Estimated volume of soil (cubic yards) to be excavated (attach grading plan):
13,000 cut and relocate as fill in other portions of the site.
6) Estimated volume of excavated soil (cubic yards) anticipated to be impacted by contaminants:
100 cy, these soils are located in an area where the cut is approximately 7 feet.
7) Estimated volume of contaminated soil expected to be disposed of offsite, if applicable:
0 cy
6
EMP Version 2, June 2018

Part 1.A. MANAGING ONSITE SOIL
If soil is anticipated to be excavated from the Brownfield Property, relocated on the Brownfields
Property, or otherwise disturbed during site grading or other redevelopment activities, please
provide a grading plan that clearly illustrates areas of cut and fill (approximate areas & volumes are
acceptable, if only preliminarydata available).
1) HAZARDOUS WASTE DETERMINATION:
a) Does the soil contain a LISTED WASTE as defined in the North Carolina Hazardous
Waste Section under 40 CFR Part 261.31-261.35?....................................... ❑Yes ®No
❑ If yes, explain why below, including the level of knowledge regarding processes
generating the waste (include pertinent analytical results as needed).
Click or tap here to enter text.
❑ If yes, do the soils exceed the "Contained -Out" levels in Attachment 1 of the
North Carolina Contained -In Policy? ................................................. ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) NOTE: IF SOIL MEETS THE DEFINITION OF A LISTED HAZARDOUS WASTE AND EXCEEDS
THE CONTAINED -OUT LEVELS IN ATTACHMENT 1 TO THE NORTH CAROLINA
CONTAINED -IN POLICYTHE SOIL MAY NOT BE RE -USED ON SITE AND MUST BE
DISPOSED OF IN ACCORDANCE WITH DEQ HAZARDOUS WASTE SECTION RULES AND
REGULATIONS.
c) Does the soil contain a CHARACTERISTIC WASTE? .................................... ❑ Yes ® No
❑ If yes, mark reason(s) why below (and include pertinent analytical results).
❑ Ignitability Click or tap here to enter text.
❑ Corrosivity Click or tap here to enter text.
❑ Reactivity Click or tap here to enter text.
❑ Toxicity ck or tap here to enter text.
❑ TCLP results lick or tab here to enter text.
❑ Rule of 20 results (20 times total analytical results for an individual
hazardous constituent on TCLP list cannot, by test method, exceed regulatory
TCLP standard)
flick or tap here to enter text.
® If no, explain rationale:
Soil impacts are associated with virgin #2 fuel oil
d) NOTE: IF SOIL MEETS THE DEFINITION OF A CHARACTERISTIC HAZARDOUS WASTE, THE
SOIL MAYNOT BE RE -USED ON SITE AND MUST BE DISPOSED OF IN ACCORDANCE
WITH DEQ HAZARDOUS WASTE SECTION RULES AND REGULATIONS.
7
EMP Version 2, June 2018

2) Screening criteria by which soil disposition decisions will be made (e.g., left in place, capped in
place with low permeability barrier, removed to onsite location and capped, removed offsite):
© Preliminary Health -Based Residential SRGs
❑ Preliminary Health -Based Industrial/Commercial SRGs
❑ Division of Waste Management Risk Calculator (For Brownfields Properties Only)
❑ Site -specific risk -based cleanup level. Please provide details of methods used for
determination/explanation.
I.IIUN UI Ld P IICIC LU CIILCI LCXL.
Additional comments:
,nL,n U1 LOP 1 ici c w c, cer text.
3) If known impacted soil is proposed to be reused within the Brownfields Property Boundary,
please check the measures that will be utilized to ensure safe placement and documentation of
same. Please attach a proposed location diagram/site map.
® Provide documentation of analytical report(s) to Brownfields Project Manager
® Provide documentation of final location, thickness and depth of relocated soil on site map
to Brownfields Project Manager once known
❑ Geotextile to mark depth of fill material.
Provide description of material:
Click or tap here to enter text.
® Manage soil under impervious cap ® or clean fill
® Describe cap or fill:
The petroleum impacted soil will be relocated to a portion of the site that is to be filled (see
drawing). This location will be under paved parking
® Confer with NC BF Project Manager if Brownfield Plat must be revised (or re -recorded if
actions are Post -Recordation).
® GPS the location and provide site map with final location.
❑ Other. Please provide a description of the measure:
lick or tap here to enter te>
4) Please describe the following action(s) to be taken during and following excavation and
management of site soils:
Management of fugitive dust from site
® Yes, describe the method will include:
If necessary, dust control will be implemented using water in a manner typically used at
construction sites.
EMP Version 2, June 2018

❑ No, explain rationale:
lick or tap here to enter text.
Field Screening of site soil
® Yes, describe the field screening method, frequency of field screening, person conducting
field screening:
Field screening by an environmental professional using PID/FID will be conducted when
excavating soil impacted with #2 fuel oil. For the remainder of the site, visual and olfactory
evaluation will be conducted by construction crews.
❑ No, explain rationale:
Click or tap here to enter text.
Soil Samale Collection
® Yes, describe the sampling method (e.g., in -situ grab, composite, stockpile, etc.):
Grab soil samples will be collected from side wall and bottom after excavation is
completed to document quality of soil remaining on site. One sample (grab for VOCs and
composite for SVOCs) of the relocated soil will be also be tested.
❑ No, explain rationale:
' - - - -- l-) enter text.
If soil samples are collected for analysis, please check the applicable chemical analytes:
® Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by EPA Method 8260
® Semi -volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) by EPA Method 8270
® Metals RCRA List (8) (arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium, mercury, lead, selenium
and silver): Specify Analytical Method Number(s):
Clicr, UI LCIP IICIC LU U1ILU1 LCXL.
❑ Pesticides: Specify Analytical Method Number(s):
Click or tap here to enter text.
❑ PCBs: Specify Analytical Method Number(s):
rii�i, r +ap here — -nter text.
❑ Other Constituents & Respective Analytical Method(s) (i.e. Hexavalent Chromium,
Herbicides, etc.): Specify Analytical Method Number(s):
Click r - l-3p here 1, enter text.
® Check to confirm that stockpiling of known or suspected impacted soils will be conducted
in accordance with Figure 1 of this EMP. Stockpile methodology should provide erosion
control, prohibiting contact between surface water/precipitation and contaminated soil,
and preventing contaminated runoff. Explain any variances or provide additional details as
needed:
EMP Version 2, June 2018

The area of known petroleum impacted soil will be flagged in the field at the conclusion of demolition
activities at the residence. When this area is ready for excavation the relocation area will be staked
and flagged. Then the impacted soil will be excavated and placed in the staked and flagged area.
Contractors will be advised that the flagged areas are protected and not to be disturbed unless
specifically authorized to do so. The flagging will remain until this area is brought to final, pre -
pavement grade.
❑ Final grade sampling of exposed native soil (i.e., soil that will not be under buildings or
permanent hardscape). Select chemical analyses for final grade samples with check boxes
below (Check all thatapply):
❑ Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by EPA Method 8260
❑ Semi -volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) by EPA Method 8270
❑ Metals RCRA List (8) (arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium, mercury, lead,
selenium and silver): Specify Analytical Method Number(s):
Click or `-- ---- �- --�- �-
❑ Pesticides: Specify Analytical Method Number(s):
UICK or tap here to enter text.
❑ PCBs: Specify Analytical Method Number(s):
Click or tap here to enter text.
❑ Other Constituents & Respective Analytical Method(s) (i.e. Hexavalent
Chromium, Herbicides, etc.):
Click or tap here to enter tex*
Please provide a scope of work for final grade sampling, including a diagram of soil
sampling locations, number of samples to be collected, and brief sampling methodology.
Samples should be collected from 0-2 ft below ground surface, with the exception of VOCs
which should be taken from 1-2 ft below ground surface. Alternatively, a work plan for
final grade sampling may be submitted under separate cover.
Click or tap here to enter text,
® If final grade sampling was NOT selected please explain rationale:
Historical use of the site and prior assessment of potential AOCs identified one area of
concern. This area will be addressed through excavation as described above. Therefore
post grade sampling is not warranted.
Part I.B. IMPORTED FILL SOIL
NO SOIL MAY BE BROUGHT ONTO THE BROWNFIELDS PROPERTY WITHOUT PRIOR APPROVAL
FROM THE BROWNFIELDS PROGRAM. According to the Brownfields IR 15, "Documenting
imported soil (by sampling, analysis, and reporting in accordance with review and written
approval in advance by the Brownfields Program), will safeguard the liability protections provided
10
EMP Version 2, June 2018

by the brownfields agreement and is in the best interest of the prospective developer/property
owner."
Requirements for importing fill:
1) Will fill soil be imported to the site? ................................................ ® Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
2) If yes, what is the estimated volume of fill soil to be imported?
Approximately 0 to 2,000 cy may be used. These soils originate from a parcel adjacent to the
subject site.
3) If yes, what is the anticipated depth that fill soil will be placed at the property? (if a range
of depths, please list the range.)
0 to 13 feet
4) Provide the source of fill, including: location, site history, nearby environmental concerns,
etc. Attach aerial photos, maps, historic Sanborn maps and a borrow source site history:
The fill source is the northern adjacent property. The subject site and the northern adjacent
property were once part of a larger property that has been subdivided. During Phase I assessment
activities conducted for the subject site, the adjacent northern property was not identified on any
environmental lists and environmental issues were not identified in historic aerial photographs,
interviews, and city directory reviews. The adjacent property, similar to the subject site, had an
agricultural use history which evolved into vacant wooded land. The northern adjacent property is
currently under development. The development of this northern adjacent site has generated
excess soil. This excess soil is currently stockpiled on the northern portion of the subject site. A
portion of this excess soil will be removed from the subject site and stored in another soil pile in
early May 2019. This new stockpile is located south of and adjacent to the subject site. The
portion of the stockpile on the subject site that is not relocated to the southern adjacent property
may be used as fill on the subject site if needed to balance the site.
5) PRIOR TO ITS PLACEMENT AT THE BROWNFIELDS PROPERTY, provide a plan to analyze fill
soil to demonstrate that it meets acceptable standards applicable to the site and can be
approved for use atthe Brownfields property.
The stockpile currently on the subject site (approximately 20,000 cy) will be sampled and the
samples analyzed as indicated below. This testing will be completed prior to moving the stockpile
on site or to the southern adjacent property.
6) Please check the applicable chemical analytes for fill soil samples. (Check all that apply):
® Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by EPA Method 8260
® Semi -volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) by EPA Method 8270
® Metals RCRA List (8) (arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium, mercury, lead,
selenium and silver): Specify Analytical Method Number(s):
Click or tap here to enter text.
11
EMP Version 2, June 2018

❑ Pesticides: Specify Analytical Method Number(s):
❑ PCBs: Specify Analytical Method Number(s):
I, LICK or tap nere io enter iex
❑ Other Constituents & Respective Analytical Method(s) (i.e. Hexavalent
Chromium, Herbicides, etc.):
Click or tap here to enter text.
7) The scope of work for import fill sampling may be provided below or in a Work Plan
submitted separately for DEQ review and approval. Attach specific location maps for in -situ
borrow sites. If using a quarry, provide information on the type of material to be brought
onto the Brownfields Property.
One soil sample will be tested for each 2,000 cy of stockpile. The samples will be collected using a
Geoprobe due to the depth of portions of the pile (approximately 25 to 30 feet). The samples will
be collected to be representative of the pile in both area and depth. We anticipate three to five
aliquots (depending on depth) will be collected from each boring equally spaced with respect to
depth. The three to five aliquots will be composited and tested by 8270 and eight RCRA metals. All
aliquots will be screened with a PID/FID. The aliquot exhibiting the highest reading will be tested
by 8260. If all readings from the FID/PID are similar, the depth of the sample selected will be
staggered from sample location to sample location.
Structural materials, #57 washed stone and aggregate base course, will be imported from a
permitted quarry. Washed stone will originate from virgin stone and does not require testing. The
aggregate base course will come from Wake Stone —Triangle which we understand to be pre -
approved. If an alternative source for aggregate base course is necessary, it will come from a pre -
approved quarry or testing will be performed. Other stone products with fines will either be
tested or come from a pre -approved quarry.
Part 1.C. EXPORTED SOIL
NO SOIL MAY LEAVE THE BROWNFIELDS PROPERTY WITHOUT APPROVAL FROM THE
BROWNFIELDS PROGRAM. FAILURE TO OBTAIN APPROVAL MAY VIOLATE A BROWNFIELDS
AGREEMENT CAUSING A REOPENER OR JEOPARDIZING ELIGIBILITY IN THE PROGRAM,
ENDANGERING LIABILITY PROTECTIONS AND MAKING SAID ACTION POSSIBLY SUBJECT TO
ENFORCEMENT. JUSTIFICATIONS PROVIDED BELOW MUST BE APPROVED BY THE PROGRAM IN
WRITING PRIOR TO COMPLETING TRANSPORT ACTIVITIES. Please refer to Brownfields IR 15 for
additional details.
1) If export from a Brownfields Property is anticipated, please provide details regarding the
proposed export actions. Volume of exported soil, depths, location from which soil will
be excavated on site, related sampling results, etc. Provide a site map with locations of
export and sampling results included.
12
EMP Version 2, June 2018

No soil is planned for export. In the event the #2 fuel oil impacted soil must be removed from the
subject site, these soils will be disposed at Soil Works facility in Selma, North Carolina.
2) To what type of facility will the export Brownfields soil be sent?
❑ Subtitle D/Municipal Solid Waste Landfill (analytical program to be determined by
landfill)
❑ Permitted but Unlined Landfill (i.e. LCID, C&D, etc.) Analytical program to be
determined by the accepting Landfill;
® Landfarm or other treatment facility
❑ Use as fill at another suitable Brownfields Property — determination that a
site is suitable will require, at a minimum, that similar concentrations of the same or
similar contaminants already exist at both sites, use of impacted soil will not increase
the potential for risk to human health and the environment at the receiving Brownfields
property, and thata record of the acceptance of such soil from the property owner of
the receiving site is provided to Brownfields. Please provide additional details below.
❑ Use as Beneficial Fill off -site at a non-Brownfields Property - Please provide
documentation of approval from the property owner for receipt of fill material. This will
also require approval by the DEQ Solid Waste Section. Additional information is
provided in IR 15. Please provide additional details below.
3) Additional Details: (if transfer of soil to another property is requested above, please provide
details related to the proposed plans).
Click or tap here to enter text.
Part I.D. MANAGEMENT OF UTILITY TRENCHES
❑ Install liner between native impacted soils and base of utility trench before filling with clean fill
(Preferred)
❑ Last out, first in principle for impacted soils (if soil can safely be reused onsite and is not
hazardous waste), i.e., impacted soils are placed back at approximately the depths they
were removed from such that impacted soil is not placed at a greater depth than the original
depth from which it was excavated.
❑ Evaluate whether necessary to install barriers in conduits to prevent soil vapor transport,
and/or degradation of conduit materials due to direct impact with contaminants?
❑ If yes, provide specifications on barrier materials:
Click or tap here to enter text.
❑ If no, include rationale here:
Click or tap here to enter text.
13
EMP Version 2, June 2018

Other comments regarding managing impacted soil in utility trenches:
Utility trenches are not expected to encounter contaminated soil and in the absence of VOC impact to
groundwater are not expected to create preferential pathways for contaminant migration.
PART 2. GROUNDWATER — Please fill out the information below.
1) What is the depth to groundwater at the Brownfields Property?
Approximately 35 feet in the vicinity of the residence
2) Is groundwater known to be contaminated by ❑onsite El offsite El both or El unknown
sources? Describe source(s):
Groundwater is not contaminated
3) What is the direction of groundwater flow at the Brownfields Property?
Likely to the east in the direction of the adjacent ponds
4) Will groundwater likely be encountered during planned redevelopment activities?
Dyes ®No
If yes, describe these activities:
UILK ur Lap here w enUer LexL.
Regardless of the answer; in the event that contaminated groundwater is encountered
during redevelopment activities (even if no is checked above), list activities for contingent
management of groundwater (e.g., dewateringof groundwater from excavations or
foundations, containerizing, offsite disposal, discharge to sanitary sewer, NPDES permit, or
sampling procedures).
A release of #2 fuel oil has occurred at the site in the past. Groundwater has been tested in the
immediate vicinity of this release and has been shown to not be contaminated. Therefore any
groundwater encountered will be presumed clean and managed as such unless visual, olfactory
or other evidence suggests the groundwater is contaminated. An environmental professional
will be on call in the unlikely event that impacted groundwater is encountered during
redevelopment activities. At that time, the appropriate approach to managing the encountered
groundwater will be determined. Since the volumes of water generated would likely be small,
temporary containerization on site (drums, poly tank) with removal and disposal at a permitted
off -site facility would be used.
5) Are monitoring wells currently present on the Brownfields Property?.................❑Yes ®No
If yes, are any monitoring wells routinely monitored through DEQ or other
agencies?.................................................................................................................. ❑Yes ❑ No
6) Please check methods to be utilized in the management of known and previously
unidentified wells.
® Abandonment of site monitoring wells in accordance with all applicable regulations. It
is the Brownfields Program's intent to allow proper abandonment of well(s) as
specified in the Brownfields Agreement, except if required for active monitoring
14
EMP Version 2, June 2018

through another section of DEQ or the EPA.
❑ Location of existing monitoring wells marked
❑ Existing monitoring wells protected from disturbance
❑ Newly identified monitoring wells will be marked and protected from further
disturbance until notification to DEQ Brownfields can be made and approval for
abandonment is given.
7) Please provide additional details as needed:
The monitoring well used to test groundwater in the vicinity of the fuel oil release was a temporary
well and was abandoned after groundwater samples were collected. A water supply well located near
the residence will be abandoned in accordance with NCAC 2C rules.
Please note, disturbance of existing site monitoring wells without approval by DEQ is not
permissible. If monitoring wells are damaged and/or destroyed, DEQ may require that the PD
be responsible for replacement of the well.
PART 3. SURFACE WATER -Please fill out the information below.
1) Is surface water present at the property? ❑ Yes ® No
2) Attach a map showing the location of surface water at the Brownfields Property.
3) Is surface water at the property known to be contaminated? ❑ Yes ® No
4) Will workers or the public be in contact with surface water during planned redevelopment
activities? ❑ Yes ® No
5) In the event that contaminated surface water is encountered during redevelopment
activities, or clean surface water enters open excavations, list activities for management of
such events (e.g. flooding, contaminated surface water run-off, stormwater impacts):
Surface water bodies do not exist at the subject site. Construction sequencing and the use of
stormwater run-off diversion structures will be used to minimize collection of water in open
excavations. In the event evidence of stormwater impacts are observed, the on -call
environmental professional will be consulted to determine the appropriate course of action.
Since the volumes of water generated would likely be small, temporary containerization on site
(drums, poly tank) with removal and disposal at a permitted off -site facility would be used, as
necessary. If stormwater accumulates in the soil excavation associated with the #2 fuel oil
release, this water will be removed and disposed as petroleum impacted at a permitted off site
facility.
PART 4. SEDIMENT — Please fill out the information below.
15
EMP Version 2, June 2018

1) Are sediment sources present on the property? ❑ Yes ® No
2) If yes, is sediment at the property known to be contaminated: ❑ Yes ❑ No
3) Will workers or the public be in contact with sediment during planned redevelopment
activities? ❑ Yes ® No
4) Attach a map showing location of known contaminated sediment at theproperty.
S) In the event that contaminated sediment is encountered during redevelopment activities, list
activities for management of such events (stream bed disturbance):
Not Applicable
PART 5. SOIL VAPOR — Please fill out the information below.
1) Do concentrations of volatile organic compounds at the Brownfields property exceed the
following vapor intrusion screening levels (current version) in the following media:
IHSB Residential Screening Levels:
Soil Vapor: ........... ❑ Yes ❑ No ® Unknown
Groundwater:..... El Yes ® No ❑ Unknown
IHSB Industrial/Commercial Screening Levels:
Soil Vapor: ........... ❑ Yes ❑ No ® Unknown
Groundwater: ..... ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown
2) Attach a map showing the locations of soil vapor contaminants that exceed site
screening levels.
3) If applicable, at what depth(s) is soil vapor known to be contaminated?
I.I It., IK UI ldp IICI C LU CIIICI ICXI
4) Will workers encounter contaminated soil vapor during planned redevelopment activities?
❑ Yes ©No ❑ Unknown
5) In the event that contaminated soil vapor is encountered during redevelopment activities
(trenches, manways, basements or other subsurface work,) list activities for management
of such contact:
In the event evidence of soil vapor exposure is identified, the on -call environmental professional
will be consulted to determine an appropriate course of action. This course of action will likely
include an increase in ventilation using large capacity fan(s).
16
EMP Version 2, June 2018

PART 6. SUB -SLAB SOIL VAPOR — Please fill out the information below if existing buildings or
foundations will be retained in the redevelopment.
1) Are sub -slab soil vapor data available for the Brownfields Property? ❑ Yes © No ❑ Unknown
2) If data indicate that sub -slab soil vapor concentrations exceed screening levels, attach a map
showing the location of these exceedances.
3) At what depth(s) is sub -slab soil vapor known to be contaminated? ❑0-6 inches ❑Other, please
describe:
-I IL. I\ VI -I./ LICK LLJ CI I - I -AL.
4) Will workers encounter contaminated sub -slab soil vapor during planned redevelopment
activities? ❑ Yes ®No ❑ Unknown
5) In the event that contaminated soil vapor is encountered during redevelopment activities, list
activities for management of such contact
In the event evidence of sub -slab soil vapor exposure is identified, the on -call environmental
professional will be consulted to determine an appropriate course of action. This course of action
will likely include an increase in ventilation using large capacity fan(s).
PART 7. INDOOR AIR — Please fill out the information below.
1) Are indoor air data available for the Brownfields Property? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown
2) Attach a map showing the location(s) where indoor air contaminants exceed site screening levels.
3) If the structures where indoor air has been documented to exceed risk -based screening levels will
not be demolished as part of redevelopment activities, will workers encounter contaminated
indoor air during planned redevelopment activities? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
4) In the event that contaminated indoor air is encountered during redevelopment activities, list
activities for management of such contact:
In the event evidence of vapor exposure through indoor air is identified, the on -call environmental
professional will be consulted to determine an appropriate course of action. This course of action will
likely include an increase in ventilation using large capacity fan(s). If adequate mitigation cannot be
implemented, we will contact NCDEQ Brownfields Program Project Manager.
VAPOR INTRUSION MITIGATION SYSTEM — Please fill out the information below.
Is a vapor intrusion mitigation system (VIMS) proposed for this Brownfields Property?
❑ Yes © No ❑ Unknown
17
EMP Version 2, June 2018

If yes, ❑ VIMS Plan Attached or ❑ VIMS Plan to be submitted separately
If submitted separately provide date:
-lick or tap here to enter tex"
VIMS Plan shall be signed and sealed by a NC Professional Engineer
If no, please provide a brief rationale as to why no vapor mitigation plan is warranted:
There are no groundwater impacts with VOCs. Impacted soil will be moved to a location
approximately 60 feet away from the structures and under a paved parking area. Thus, vapor
intrusion is not a concern at this site.
CONTINGENCY PLAN — encountering unknown tanks, drums, or other waste materials
In this section please provide actions that will be taken to identify or manage unknown
potential new sources of contamination. During redevelopment activities, it is not uncommon
that unknown tanks, drums, fuel lines, landfills, orother waste materials are encountered.
Notification to DEQ Brownfields Project Manager, UST Section, Fire Department, and/or other
officials, as necessary and appropriate, is required when new potential source(s) of
contamination are discovered. These Notification Requirements were outlined on Page 1 of this
EMP.
Should potentially impacted materials be identified that are inconsistent with known site
impacts, the DEQ Brownfields Project Manager will be notified and a sampling plan will be
prepared based on the EMP requirements and site -specific factors. Samples will generally be
collected to document the location of the potential impacts.
Check the following chemical analysis that are to be conducted on newly identified releases:
® Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by EPA Method 8260
® Semi -volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) by EPA Method 8270
® Metals RCRA List (8) (arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium, mercury, lead, selenium and
silver)
Click or tap here to enter text.
❑ Pesticides: Specify Analytical Method Number(s):
Click or tap here ' .
❑ PCBs: Specify Analytical Method Number(s):
Click or tap here to enter text
❑ Other Constituents & Analytical Method(s) (i.e. Hexavalent Chromium, Herbicides, etc.)
Please note, if field observations indicate the need for additional analyses, they should
be conducted, even if not listed here.
Lr11L,N UI LOP I ICI C LU CI ILCI LCA,
18
EMP Version 2, June 2018

Please provide details on the proposed methods of managing the following commonly
encountered issues during redevelopment of Brownfields Properties.
Underground Storage Tanks:
In the event a UST is encountered, the on -call environmental professional will be consulted to
determine the appropriate course of action. In addition, the Brownfield Program Project Manager
will be informed of the discovery. The UST will be removed, disposed and the area in the vicinity of
the UST assessed for evidence of a release.
Sub -Grade Feature/Pit:
In the event evidence of a sub -grade feature/pit is encountered, the on -call environmental
professional will be consulted to determine the appropriate course of action. In addition, the
Brownfield Program Project Manager will be informed of the discovery. The historical function of
the feature/pit will be assessed to determine if environmental assessment is warranted.
Buried Waste Material:
In the event buried waste is encountered, the on -call environmental professional will be consulted
to determine the appropriate course of action. In addition, the Brownfield Program Project
Manager will be informed of the discovery. The nature of the waste will be evaluated to determine
if environmental assessment is warranted.
Re -Use of Impacted Soils On -Site:
Click or tap here to enter text.
If unknown, impacted soil is identified on -site, management on -site can be considered after the
project team provides the necessary information, outlined in Part 1.A. Item 11, for Brownfields
Project Manager approval prior to final placement on -site.
If other potential contingency plans are pertinent, please provide other details or scenarios as
needed below:
None
POST -REDEVELOPMENT REPORTING
® Check this box to acknowledge that a Redevelopment Summary Report will be required for the
project. If the project duration is longer than one year, an annual update is required and will be
due by January 31 of each year, or 30 days after each one-year anniversary of the effective date of
this EMP (as agreed upon with the Project Manager). These reports will be required for as long as
physical redevelopment of the Brownfields Property continues, except that the final
Redevelopment Summary Report will be submitted within 90 days after completion of
redevelopment. Based on the estimated construction schedule, the first Redevelopment Summary
19
EMP Version 2, June 2018

Report is anticipated to be submitted on 6/10/2020
The Redevelopment Summary Report shall include environment -related activities since the last
report, with a summary and drawings, that describes:
1. actions taken on the Brownfields Property;
2. soil grading and cut and fill actions;
3. methodology(ies) employed for field screening, sampling and laboratory analysis of
environmental media;
4. stockpiling, containerizing, decontaminating, treating, handling, laboratory analysis and
ultimate disposition of any soil, groundwater or other materials suspected or confirmed
to be contaminated with regulated substances; and
5. removal of any contaminated soil, water or other contaminated materials (for example,
concrete, demolition debris) from the Brownfields Property (copies of all legally required
manifests shall be included).
❑X Check box to acknowledge consent to provide a NC licensed P.G. or P.E. sealed, Redevelopment
Summary Report in compliance with the site's Brownfields Agreement.
20
EMP Version 2, June 2018

APPROVAL SIGNATURES
Brownfields Project Number: 22002-18-092
Brownfields Project Name: Overture Cary
Prospective Developer: CR"P-G­RE_P_ Overture Cary Owner,, L.L.C.
Printed Name/Title/Company: Robert Morgan/Greystar Real
Estate Partners A
-'-
Consultant: Mid -Atli n i 'i�eAssociates
Printed Name/Title/Company.- Daniel Nielsen/Principal/Mid-
Atlantic Associates
rownfields Project Manager:Kelly Johnson
21
EMP Version 2, June 2018
_5
Date ( 1v li- Of t Zip to •I C1,11C I
a
(I ir
Date ( I I . il i.. "t v, I
Date ; 114 ot/f;io it) (ontet a a"I't
k i 1.

Figure 1
NCBP Diagram for Temporary-
Containment of Impacted or Potentially
Impacted Soil
Cross -Section View
Top Plastic C:ov(.x Shutting: lindorliner: 1 layer, minimum of 10
(1 I,syer, minim urn: 10 mil thick) mil thick plastic
Berm
(Straw hales, R%ciglit
composted earth, etc.) (If plastic
Wver used)
Land Contaminated Soils
Surface/
Straw Bale Berm
Map View
ght
k7
.......... ......... . ..... ---_
F L Contanrinated Soils
■
..._.... _.... ....... ....... ....... ....... ._......
...» - V
DO■ ❑
Plastic
_ Sheeting
Note Adapted from NC DEQ UST Section 'Guidelines for Ex Situ Petroleum Contaminated Soil Remediation" dated December, 1, 2013
22
EMP Version 2, June 2018

23
EMP Version 2, June 2018

REDEVELOPMENT PLANS

00
0
N
0
4
S
or 4F
00
I Z:1 do,
/ PROPOSED PROPERTY /
LINE
B2A
♦ I
� A3
_1
A7�0
A4 Al
\\ \ 20'-0" UTILITY Al A
\ EASEMENT \ \
CARPORT #1 \ \\ \ \\ \ Al
(9) SPACES
(HATCHED AREA) \ \ \ Al
RE: 1 /A1.38 \ \ \ \
PROPOSED PROPERTY \ \
LINE \ \ \
\ \\ \ \ A2
10'-0" PROGRESS \ \ \\ \ A2
ENERGY EASEMENT \ \ \ \
\ \ \ Al
\ \ Al
x
CARPORT #2 PUMP ROOM
(8) SPACES \ \
(HATCHED AREA) \ \ -
RE: 1/A1.39 \ \ \ MAINT. ROOM
RISER ROOM
\ \ \ \ TRASH ROOM
\
I
1
I
1
,
GENERAL SITE PLAN NOTES:
1. REFER TO CIVIL PLANS FOR ALL DIMENSIONS 6. REFER TO LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS FOR POOL
\ OF SURFACE PARKING AND PAVING, AS WELL & COURTYARD LAYOUTS, PLANTING, RETAINING
\ \ \ AS FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATIONS AND SURFACE WALLS, DECORATIVE PAVING, ETC.
� \ \ SITE DRAINAGE. 7. PROVIDE
2. REFER TO LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT AND CIVIL FENCE. GATES SHAN. BLL BIE SELGH F-CLOSING CLOSING& ENCLOSURE
PLANS FOR CURB RAMP LOCATIONS AND SELF -LATCHING, SHALL HAVE COMPLIANT
DETAILS. ACCESSIBLE MANUV. CLEARANCES & SHALL
OPEN AWAY FROM POOL. (RE: LAND. DWGS)
3. PROVIDE HANDICAP PARKING STALLS IN
ACCORDANCE WITH APPLICABLE ACCESSABILITY 8. DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE FOR REFERENCE
STANDARDS. ONLY, REFER TO CIVIL DRAWINGS FOR EXACT
BOUNDARY DIMENSIONS AND DIMENSION
4. REFER TO CIVIL DRAWINGS FOR ACCESSIBLE CONTROL PLAN.
/ PARKING SIGNAGE.
5. REFER TO STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS FOR 9• FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATIONS ARE INCLUDED
FOUNDATION PLAN & TYPICAL DETAILS. DRAWINGS.
FOR RENCE ONLY, REFER TO CIVIL
PROJECT
SITE
DENOTES LOCATION OF ACCESSIBLE ROUTE � � � � � � ■ DENOTES LOCATION OF ACCESSIBLE
\ I \ \ I LAKE GROVE BLVD INTO BUILDING. MAINTAIN MAXIMUM RUNNING ENTRANCES INTO BUILDING.
SLOPE OF 5% AND MAXIMUM CROSS SLOPE
VICINITY MAP 2� OF2%.
y'\
UTILITY \ UTILITY AND PIPELINE EASEMENT
/\ \ \ EASEMENT
STAIR #4
\ \ \ FUTURE GREENWAY PATH
\� \ ♦ \ �� - PROPOSED PROPERTY LINE
POOL PAVILION
RE:1 /A1.40
COURTYAtBt
6 STAIR #2 \ \ \ — — — — / ,'� PROPOSED PROPERTY LINE
® POOL ROOM \
B4 '-------------- —
CLUBHOUSE
yIA O / /\\ \� ORMWAT \\ \
A9 A2 B1 B2 , \ \ MAVGEMENFACIITY "A \ \
EEO STAIR #1 \ \ \ \
B1 COURTYARD V11
i
A �
®
A ® DOG
A3HC / PARK \ \ \
A3 B1 B2
\
STAIR #3 200' CELL TOWER FALL ZONE I \
qc
\ C I
I-4-
EXISTING�
_\
I i I
I I I I I CELL TOWER
I I �
I I
20'-C" UTILITY EASEMENT
PROPO D PROPERTY LINE
---------------
TO+�1N OF MORRISVILLE_ _
TOWN OF CARY
SITE PLAN
I I I f5 30 0"
PROPOSED PROPERTY LINE
------------------------------------------ ---------------------
`0_11ll
H 1CARo��'.
'.
FEss/o
L
,p ARCHITECT �
?PRT/V
C)
�: w SEAL �A•.o
'W 51838 0; _
d =;
�/ y•. MORTHCARD�;��P. C
O�S' TO IN
III
W
Q
0
0
z
c�
z
U
Ld
w
Z 0
O�
u� w
wN
Ld
Q�
o�
0
z
C
f
W L
Zrn
O U
� � m
0
f
X � a
Q E Nr. +
aO 00
O U� ro
MAIN o
U)
y
W
W
® �
o
02)
JOB NO.: 17014
FILE NAME: 7014A102
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
X ISSUED FOR PRICING
X ISSUED FOR PERMIT
ISSUED FOR CONSTRUCTION
DRAWING NO.
A1.02

A i �-�_ SS\ TOP=336.16' GENERAL NOTES
\ \ \ \ , \--" ss �_ _ \�� ` INV IN=330.06' (N)
1 P , �O \\©1 S 82'16'18" j 1.59 `lNY OUT=329.95' (S) 1. THIS IS A SURVEY OF AN EXISTING PARCELS) OF LAND. THIS IS A
Ss
vw \ � � v� v A vAVv v A r ^� I I r / r / � \ v i \ , �' V A \ TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY.
\ / 016 \P ` 341 _ _ 15_P 13 P \ \ 2. BEARINGS FOR THIS SURVEY ARE BASED ON NC GRID NAD 83
0, \v \ v 23 \ r / / / / 50 THEM BUFFER v \ � v i � -.Q- A v \
€ 3 C \ '� 3. ALL DISTANCES ARE HORIZONTAL GROUND DISTANCES.
\\\\\\ \ { ' / (M�ASU ED (50' FROM TO \ _ _ \ C� , 4. ZONING: PDD MAJOR PER WAKE CO. GIS, NO ZONING REPORT PROVIDED.
\ Y \ \ ` \ ' \\�\\ �ara\ i / / / ( /OF E ANK, EACH SIDE) \ Cg Q \ \ 17 P� -34 _ �34 _ 1 (D1�\P \ \ ww 5. AREA BY COORDINATE GEOMETRY.
\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ LC�T 2 M \ w \ 0 3 _ 2 \ 1\ P.
/ / t - v V / v v \ Qo • p A \ 6. FLOOD NOTE: THIS PROPERTY IS NOT LOCATED IN A SPECIAL FLOOD
RE,DUS TWIN AKES ( `� _ ` - - \ \ \ �\ _ - / \ 11 p •\ 1 p \ �\ \ ` \ HAZARD ZONE, IT IS LOCATED IN ZONE X AS DEFINED BY F.E.M.A F.I.R.M
\ \ \ \ \ \ P N: Or�1455 3962/ --_ \ b \ \ \ \ COMMUNITY PANEL3720074500J
v v A\ v\\\ v� \� `�\V `/ t i / J - V A y A / v v 12 P v51P \
r� \ \s \ \ \ / ( D. 15074 G. 7�6 \ 1 \ \ \12 \ DATED MAY 2, 2406.
\ \ O : \ \ / \ \ / \ \ -\ �\0\13
7. REFERENCES: B.M. 2009, PG. 1197, B.M. 2009, PG. 1201
\ \ \ \ \ \ \ a ° \\\\ \� \ \ \\ ( I ( M. ?bl! 7 PG. 721 _ - \ \ \ \ / \ -\ \�- - �\ \ \ \
\\\\ \ \\ \ \ 526,33� SF / \ \ \ \ \ \\ - - 'C" \ \10 POF THE WAKE COUNTY REGISTRY.
\\((12.08AC. \ 16 \ 8. UTILITY STATEMENT
\ ( - \344��`` N F THE UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHOWN HAVE BEEN LOCATED FROM FIELD
v v / ZONING: N LAKES PDD $AU III (NORTH) v � , � v VA V Vv� % \ \\\ \\ \ `� \ \ \ �3 \ \ TOWN OF CARY SURVEY INFORMATION AND EXISTING DRAWINGS. THE SURVEYOR MAKES NO
\\ \ \ \ I LAND \USE:\ VACANT \ \ \ �� -\ \ \ \ \\ 1 \ \ \ PIN: 0745554680GUARANTEE THAT 1HE UNDERGROUND UTiUT1ES SHOWN COMPRISE ALL
\?\\\_ -\1 \ \\ \ SUCH UTILITIES IN THE AREA, EITHER IN SERVICE OR ABANDONED. THE
,\\\�;�\\ \ \ \ \\ \ \ \ i ` \ _ \ \ \ �\ \ \ \ �. / / \ \ \ \\ \\ \ D.B. 16174, PG. 1405 SURVEYOR FURTHER DOES NOT WARRANT THAT THE UNDERGROUND
\ \�\ \ \\ � \\\ \\`\ \ 1 \ \ �\ LAND USE: PARK UTILITIES SHOWN ARE IN THE EXACT LOCATION INDICATED ALTHOUGH HE
\\\101 PROGRSS ENERGY---- �`g\- \\ 12�\ZONING: TWIN LAKES PDD DOES CERTIFY THAT THEY ARE LOCATED AS ACCURATELY AS POSSIBLE
\\\\EASEMENT \ 35s 3� \ \ \ \ \ / / / \ \ \ \ \ 1 P \ FROM INFORMATION AVAILABLE. THE SURVEYOR HAS NOT PHYSICALLY
°\\\D.B. 12096, f�G. 3075- -356- - -- \ \ S�\ \ \ \ s 3 ¢\\\ \\ \. \g LOCATED THE UNDERGROUND UIiLiTiES.
1 G - _ - - ` \ \ \ \ \ \ PC�S S1TC\LEASE \ \ \\ \ "\ 9. VERTICAL DATUM IS BASED ON NAVD 88.
\ �\ \ \ y5t \ \ / FfB. 9300 P 1642 \ \ \ \P,\\��\\16 \P 11p p -- - ��\ \ \ \` , \\ \ \\ 0 \ \ 10. TREE SURVEY PROVIDED BY MR. STEVEN BALL, RF, PWS,' NC REGISTERED
v \ _ A w V A // /ACCESS DRIVE AND \ \ \ V V2 E \ �� \ \ FORESTER #1723 SOIL & ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS PA.
\ \ \\ \ \ \ \ ` \ \\\\\\ \ \ 24 16 P \ `� \ \ \ so \ 34�-/� / \ \ 10 \ I 11. CONTOUR LINES DISPLAYED ON THE PROPERTY OF RAYMOND WONG ARE
\�A \vv \ v - - - - - - v A V A v V A A / \ v A v \
ASSOCIATED UTILITIES \ \ \ \ \ I
\\ \ \ \ \\ \\ \ \\\ \ g Ism 35g` \ w \ NOT !N EASE NT \ \ ' DIGITIZED FROM WAKE COUNTY GIS SHAPE FILES.
\ \ V A\ mowv \\w \v v�� �v vv v A V A vv \�� ��--/ _ _-v V A \ V A \ V A v,1 \ fA�( \
_ _ AILITY ----_vv v v v�,�PTOP=372.5T \ \\ \\\'�A� A \ - - - -----------\ V v V \v 1 �13 R � \\\\ \ \ \ \I-ACCEASEMENT -� - t -� t 1 19 1�INV=368.97' 15"RCP \ \\ \ \ -fa \{ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ ` \
\\ \ \ \\ a \ \ o Fo Fo =7? --- Fo1-10 P \ \ \ \\ \ \ �\ I D.B. 9300, PG. 1642 `�
EXISTING 196 t�N- TEALTH �
v \ v ; y v �� 14 P v 5 P� \ v (MONOPOLE COMNtl�JNI TImNS \ \\ \
\ \ � \ \\ \ \ s-/ uE��� \ \ \SEE QEMO ON NO ' \
\ \ v\ V vv °h / 1 v � 91 \ tj v i TOWER
\ �6 'SI NCH \ 0 SHE C-2
o---�------ --� -- -r _
\ \ \ a \ .+ v ue _-- -� 3 \ \ v� i� V ` \ v V�� AA t \ 101 p 17, WO w
�i�J 89'30'23" W 248.58' \ v. R _ v { - \ v 1 i v \ v I
\ uE \\\ -� \ \ \ ' - x- x i \\\ \
N/F \'v\A\V A , \ \ \, \ z (l V`v v i3 c - .- s 1 0v V`G\
ROBERT & AMBER TAYLOR \ \ v \ \ s
\.a 6 v VA, 0 0p 5 1 v
PIN: 0745444852 \ vV A V vv ay f \ \\ \wvA\ v� 5 G �- 8'C �-6lo T: 11 4-
D.B. 15575, PG. 22$3 \\\A�� \ y v A> Ay \ \'v i\VA Vo \� i 07 C �' EXISTING DRIVE AND ASSOCIATED v \ \Z\ m I \ "'� v v i / - �� �� E n X / 1 1 `v V A V A
V \ b v F y \ \ !' r. UTILITIES TO BE REMOVED v o A �� - - w "F 1 P 12
LAND USE: SINGLE FAMILY \ \ v i 'v 1. A \c A \ j" _ v / t v \ \
ZONING: VLDR v \\f t I (t \� -���� f 9�PE IXISTING STRUCTURE \ i� vv \ v / „ - I EV�
\\ 12 TO BE REMOVED \ v A v -1 - - -94
\ oV A \ \ A vv �\ \ \ i \ \ A A o\� v i 1 1N�AJG, YM�QN@, E'vTAL. i 'a. s o vv V v GRAVEL v I i
745t449 5 t 14 �s \ \\ \ DRIVE \ r 49 x x Xi r \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ ss \ TOP=335.22'
D.El� 89 7, QG. 408 i ® 3 �y 1 P \ \ - _ I I I ( / (� A \ v \ \ \ \ vv \ INV IN=328.40' (N)
\ INV OUT=328.31' S
\USE.\ SI�IGL ZA
11 fFo - 3s3 \\� ( )
TOP=371.70' \\\ v q\1A ZpN(NG: 1 G (Dd6i '` \ 11i,
LANQ USE SIN LE FAMILYr O1 `" ©
�\\ \ \� \ g \ \ , 1 / J as _
INV IN=368.10' 15"RCP(N) ( \ \ \ \ � v � � � ( i � � � r � � ? i "' v '0�
\ \\ \ \ \ '\ , i i \ IXI§TIOG) EASEMENT �T0 /BED 7 M� l ` P� © F \ ~ \ \ i \ t o4 ELL TO R {Si \ P �\ \ 20' TOWN OF CARY UTILITY o
INV OUT=368.00' 15' RCP(S} /� \ v \ \ \ \° \ v t �I �� ( \ \ \ �►-_ j \ V �t
v\ \ v ; � ` �ABJ�NgO ED v \ ,, 010 V A \ jo i 36 0 A S v mow" \ -_ AND PIPELINE EASEMENT �.
7 iS DRI1�E I \ 1 P �� \ Q.B. 8057, PG. 773 0,
\\\\rnA \oA \ z \�� ¢ I / \4 �� c x n eAn �` P� \ �♦ F 1 i \\ A q
CP S 5' t E 2�1.66' S p TOWN OF MORRISVILLE �� �. _m VP V 12 t� - V-�-____ F o i I I t �3 G� 9-1
1 1 UE - -� UE UE
�6 TOWN of CARY \ v
3 3 b0 r,° G C� v \ \ 014 P V p1ovPv
12P 10P
(D12 �� �\ 10 P v v \ vvv`
010�14G vv 011\P t
0\\ \ \ \ ¢ vV° \ CARY�MZ9RRISVILLE 1 P oVP� \
TOP=369.29' I 1 \ \ \ y \ i .� \1 1 p 11�P\ p3 Cr+ \1 \� ', i �\ \\ \\ \
t , t _ - \ \CITY LIMITS\ BOUNDARY
INV=365.54 15'RCP i \ \ \ \ V' -- �� y v \ V A v \ /( t \ // / / / // ��' �� / / - - --343- v \ $r
TEMPORARY DRAIN GE ` ( t ( /\ / / / / / 11 P \
3 g i AE 10 P-EASEME-N-T�vv
\i 1 11 366 - D.B. 12916, 'P-G. 2360 > > ; 1 i , / �. i I I \ ,� \ - _ 5 P
O
P 50 STREAM E3C1F�E� �� \ J =- = -364 % 1 I I / ' I i I -�- - _ _.. \ \
w { I I I rr / ( ( I I A (ME-50� FROM TOP v
\ \
/ r I i \ OF BANK EACI�--SIDE) \ ,
\ \ , '_ • 10' PROGR OS ENERGY '
/ 62 ( ZONING: N LA ES P D MU III ,P,2 _ Mu,
'-III
w V �^ / ,%' EASEMENT - ' 7 �- �/ i
\ \ �_ �"' , / \ D.B. 12096, PG. 107�1 / ) / LAN USE. VACANT r \ \ \ \ \
/ J t l ( ( r / / V A i V i / / \' C115 P
INV IN=364.92 15 RCP(N) \ \ \ \ I (� / �\ D.B. 12096, PG. 10478/ / / r / / r \ / ' \ \ \
/ /� l l i / r l \ A v�-�/ A j / �10JP A r/ 13 p
INV OUT=364.82' 15"RCP(S) U12 P \ r / J / 00111p P\ \
�\ A i V - - - /� - / / / 1 P // / / / P/ 12 d V A �� \ r 1 t \ TOP=333.84'
\ \ V \ 3 CH / / �15 P 0 �/ A r / J i J14 �\
_ ` / INV IN-324.99' (N)
\ s \ INV OUT=324.87' (S)
o\ r i / // // h� © ,'� / / / P I V A10 P A 12 P A r / s
TOP=368.10' \ \ f \ t� v " 010 P // 011 t)10 WO / ' 13 Pi' 14 P/ / / Of4 P I 010 P ) 1 / l J i J J / Po1a \
INV IN=364.15' 15"RCP(N) \ \t \ a %\� , ` \ ' ' / M,. / /� �3 0 / 10 P / / / / / td" 10 P j
INV OUT=364.05' 15"RCP(S) \ 3 (/ t ---- f' / / 16 P ��� �x3 P / / �� Q4 P 1 \ x. 14 P / /
4 ' /
�,��, �20 PO f� c)1 P I 03
\ \ ? \ \\ \ Q11( 1 RAP '13P 1� - / / / 011 .116 '� 11/ (D 1 pQ12P ! `' i 14c� 11 1 '10Pi/ ��' / / / / // / / i I
4 moo- / 4 )' Q�od15i 10, o Q °I�' I 10 ©
3�/ ---
_
INV=364.2T 15"RCP \ \4 \ \\ \ s \ 9 ----- -3so� _ - - = _ 1 N'89'249" Ni �23 6' 1 _ - _ = \ \ \ 12 P`'
. M_ T
_ � � \
_ --
�\��. P \V A
/ / /P / / i13P
N/F
s Silo / / / / / � / DEBRIS' ,
\` \ SD = "`- \ / \ �\ EXISTING BUILDING I STRUNCK, CONLEY, ETAL.1N� �o' �i' �� >,
v vv A r PIN: 0745543536 / / 1 / / / / , / C v @1� 11 P A
\ D.B. 12358, / ' / '� / / / / / / , / / 11 P
INV=364.36' 15"RCP \
PG. 2487 N/F / / _ � �' �10' � / / / / 2 � (Q I
B.M. 2005, PG. 1045 KEP MORRISVILLE REALTY LLC / / / / / �' 10 P - `\
LAND USE: MULT TENANT RETAIL PIN: 0745449957 /r. // / / / $/ / / / �,�' / / / / / / / / �.'� - �s �` } 1b tP1 G
N/F \ ZONING: NAC D.B. 8327, PG. 1777 / / ��r' / ��� / /� / / / / m 11
B.M. 2005, PG. 1045
APOLLO USA LLC I � ( / ''� � � / ���� � '' �� ;,�� / / / DELINEATED /' � � { 41p{ P {
PIN: 0745447646 ' \ LAND USE: DAY CARE / ,' / �36' / / / WETLANDS / 12 P
D.B. 16160, PG. 1022 ( /
LAND USE: SINGLE FAMILY ZONING: NAC (�� ' / / �� / / / 3 / �, / / / / 01 114 M
`
ZONING: NAC 1 , EXISTING BUILDING t 0 % / ,' / i i ' / / / / 012 \
ki
LEGEND
i QQ EXISTING IRON PIPE
O
IRON PIPE SET
� A
CALCULATED POINT
NY
r ®
BORE HOLE
14
QS
SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE
©
SANITARY SEWER CLEANOUT
WV
a
WATER VALVE
®
WATER METER
�
FIRE HYDRANT
pp
TELEPHONE PEDESTAL
i
rn (1)TELEPHONE
MANHOLE
o ❑E
ELECTRIC BOX
LIGHT POLE
CO -)POWER
i
POLE
ili
CURB INLET
rn
c QD
STORM DRAINAGE MANHOLE
❑
YARD INLET
0
U
SD STORM DRAIN PIPE
71
i
OU OVERHEAD UTILITY LINE
v
W WATER LINE
J
i
o
SS SANITARY SEWER LINE
a
T TELEPHONE LINE
Ji
G GAS LINE
i
UE UNDERGROUND ELECTRI
UT UNDERGROUND TELEPHI
41
o -X
X- FENCE LINE
�10 sus•. `} %
EXISTING BUILDING t / 12 P �' l 13 P \ /
N/F/// /Q11 / // / _ __ \ \ ��� \\ S\ 14 P
LEE MOORE OIL CO /
t (- 13 ~ \ \ \
\ PIN: 0745541516D.B. 11479( ((�
B.M. 2005,E PG. 10452471 N� I (/ 15 ®�5 P
LAND USE: FOODMART wl t�I V A - - - _ - - v v v v v 0
ZONING: NAC coo p
TREE LEGEND i gl
M 10 P-
i �;1{� 13 P\ �\
@A ASH o 11 l `R 11
19 BE BEECH \ z� I \ ® \ Q10 R -', \ V vv \ \ V vv i \ I i ��'� / l
@e BIRCH v A ��� ®� \ \ \ vvv \\ \� \\ \ t\ '� �/
to C CEDAR \ `�`�Qio`P \ _ - 338 - \ \ \ \ \ U \ { '
\ \ \ \ t y i i
@� CHERRY \ 10�p \ ` - 20� TOWN OF CA
EENWAY\EASEtvt\ENT\ _ w t { r / / / TOP {
'4 Pv -- - • �� v INP OU3=33 .86' h8"RCP(S) �I i { i I I ®t ss\ {
@M CRAPE MYRTLE \ 0 � 3� ---- ----BM: 2017 G 1 \ V 3 I ( I I I
o� EXISTING 10' TRAIL O \ 1
.10vwHo v 1 h o P l I l l i ' 12 P
(-CYP (YPRFSS i �.., .,.. o,,,, �,.,., ' \ �34' _ --- \ \ s lb P \ \ 0t ( I � Q------ - - TOP=326.31' III
11 P� p11 P®11 P \ \0 I { ( I_L �'- ---- 32
r \ �A� \ p - - - 1i1, P \ \ \ \ \ i \ \ I L - =323 - =33222 - � INV IN=310.71' (S)
r W71) P �0 P�3©_ 13 P 012 P ,QQO P��\ \ \� \ \`_ \! \ ---_ _ - - = _ _ - = _ _ INV IN=310.76' (N} t
- \ `" - - - 3aa - - - - - - - - _ - _ 3�-1 NV OUT=310.61 EA
_ 45 / 3 \
3kY 3n 3n ny.
3ti
18 H
HICKORY
@HD
HOLLY
10 MG
MAGNOLIA
15 M
MAPLE
@,W
JAPANESE MAPLE
�8 MI
MIMOSA
zo RO
RED OAK
&0
WHITE OAK
310
OAK
@PEC
PEACH
@PER
PEAR
@PE
PECAN
@8 PRS
PERSIMMON
is P
PINE
t4 PO
POPLAR
fA RB
REDBUD
14 sY
SYCAMORE
1a W
WALNUT
DOUBLE
AND TRIPLE TRUNKS
@D-O
DOUBLE OAK
�z}'0 T-o
TRIPLE OAK
CALIPER INCH SIZE OF TREE
T-0 TYPE OF TREE
-D FOR DOUBLE, T FOR TRIPLE
LINE TABLE
LINE
BEARING
DISTANCE
L1
S 07'20'02" W
25.74'
L2
S 36'44'51" E
39.98'
L3
S 81'44'51" E
9.26'
L4
N 10*28'24" W
28.09'
L5
S 00'30'42" W
41.80'
L6
S 40'36'55" E
84.77'
L7
S 24'55'22" E
49.75'
L8
S 33'07'59" E
83.95'
L9
S 29'58'54" E
43.37'
L10
N 60'05'24" E
19.95'
L11
S 26'55'21" E
80.33'
L12
S 26'55'21" E
5.82'
L13
S 52'44'31" E
98.31'
L14
S 05'35'49" W
45.71'
L15
S 13*18'18" E
72.16'
L16
S 32*39'11" E
22.68'
L17
S 10'09'11" E
33.94'
L18
S 37'25'22" E
28.83'
L19
S 25'37'22" E
58.34'
L20
S 24'49'23" E
53.01'
L21
S 62'04'31" W
31.52'
L22
S 36'26'38" E
40.11'
L23
S 50'47'25" E
4.99'
L24
S 36'44'51" E
83.93'
L25
S 53*12'00" W
47.33'
LAKE GROVE BOULEVARD
VARIABLE WIDTH PUBLIC R/W
P.B. 2007, PG. 1743 J
CURVE
TABLE
CURVE
RADIUS
ARC LENGTH
CHORD BEARING
CHORD LENGTH
Cl
101.00'
125.06'
S 29'07'58" E
-
117.22'
C2
123.26'
147.60'
S 59'53'20" E
138.94'
C3
308.14'
160.20'
S 34'42'56" E
158.40'
C4
145.31'
73.43'
S 47'50'33" E
72.65'
C5
140.99'
77.83'
S 20'02'49" E
76.85'
C6
415.24'
153.72'
S 25'09'53" E
152.84'
C7
190.01'
26.79'
S 39'03'04" E
26.77'
C8
324.77'
71.00'
N 69'08'27" E
70.86'
C9
131.16'
103.31'
S 78'57'54" E
100.66'
C10
115.07'
145.28'
S 29*15'22" E
135.82'
C11
86.19'
45.04'
S 00'48'41" E
44.53'
C12
111.08'
79.08'
S 26'01'58" E
77.42'
C13
186.46'
8.31'
S 3327'47" E
8.31'
C14
99.99,
75.35'
S 11*14'32" E
73.58'
C15
101.96'
55.53'
S 09'13'10" E
54.85'
C16
1053.56'
130.60'
N 3538'29" E
130.51'
C17
1050.88'
386.24'
N 49'44'21" E
384.07'
C18
3482.28'
185.97'
N 11'31'06" W
185.95'
C19
8570.36'
81.28'
N 36'40'22" W
81.28'
C20
1338.14'
46.21'
N 30'56'26" W
46.21'
C21
1206.17'
54.40'
N 19'54'32" W
54.40'
C22
1218.16'
21.31'
N 28'51'35" W
21.31'
C23
1338.14'
12.82'
N 29'40'37" W
12.82'
--r-- 30- 3n 3 3n 35 n T P 331.92' \ \ \ SS 's "
`7�' GPI;$�)- \
,. rcd
IN' --- -- - \1
TOP 33� 9/23' / / �. ��IN= 3 'i
_ \ 5.2b
I Ol�T=3 3.18� 18"�CP(k) \ INtV QU =3 5.20'\ 4"RCP(S)
- _ _ - - - ` _ _ _ 342 -7F - _
- GRACE PARK/DEVELOPMENT
ASSN. INC.
PIN: 0745548227
D.B. 13811, PG. 1256
' B.M. 2007, PG. 2650 APPROVED by the Town of Cary
LAND USE: TOWNHOUSE
ZONING: NAC Development Review Committee
GRAPHIC SCALE
50 0 25 50 100
1 inch = 50 ft.
18-DP-075
By: dlovelan
02/15/2019
� QQ
N V
U N
4
�U
z E
h "
S
tV M
O
VJ
� A
® V
O
t1
co
W
a
.-i
d+
aCQ
Z
ado
H c
E' W H
E- InCO
9 O
W Wa
co a
W
A U
z
o
a a �
A
R� O
V
�a
l �
W �
PROJECT NO. GRE-17000
FH.ENME: GRE17000-Cl
CHECKED BY: RTF
DFLkWN BY: JBT
SCALE: 1 "=50'
DATE' 02-10-19
SHEET NO. C-1
'.'�J WADAMs
NOTE: LINE AND CURVE DATA INCLUDES OFFSITE LINE
WORK NOT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS PROJECT SITE.
FINAL DRAWING -
RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION

m
C
L
U
in
E
a
r
N
tV
in
N
N
3
a
0
1
0
0
h
w
rn
0
0
X
\ C? s r EXISTING BU{LDING" r
r��-
/ �
\\
\ A
a
4�, d'F'� YZ 35'd i•OWWt�
GARY U ILIT �
EA WENT/
\ �/
x Z,
\ \�_ \ p.'
\ '\
RETAINING WALL,#1 WITH —
FENCE (DESIGN Bpi OTHERS)
of /.. � ,,,y \ ✓.%`�� ��
J 11X,t�(!v yr t^ni
STRSE
TOT
EASEM
� QgDICATED
10' PR06ESS
ENERGY EASEMENT �� �
D.B. 120g6�G. 1075 �a
20' 'MINIMUM N20'15'19"W
STREEtTSCAPE151.81'
\ (7,930%0) z
R=12t
\ kt
IN
a £ 20' TOWN
TAYLOR, ROBERTUTILITY E.
PIN: 07454448.5
D.B. 15575, PG. 2283 MORRISVILLE
20"',STREETY
t3 E
iff
i 4 f
DAMS DRIVE STREETS CAPE ((
41
%
(�
SEE OFFSITE ROAD WIDENING
1
PLANS BY KIMLEY HORN
;
(SHEETS RO.00—R6.03)
a
1
,,..
3�
�
4
APOLLO USA LLC.
PIN: 0745447646
{, k
D.B. 16160, PG. 1022
�F
� a
SITE
LEGEND
z
-a-
SIGNAGE
,'
4
YARD LIGHTSt
;
LIGHT POLE MARION REAL ESTATE
PIN: 0745447200
POWER POLE D.B. 13928,
PG. 2482
TRAFFIC DIREC11ONAL ARROW
, t
ACC
ACCESSIBLE PARKING STALL
VAN
VAN ACCESSIBLE PARKING STALL
xi
-T
—
ACCESSIBLE RAMPS
TYPE 0
TYPE ® TYPE
" = h
ACCESSIBLE ROUTE
slim
11e11mileil■
PHASE LINE
- -
PROPERTY LINE
- - -
RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE
-
- - -
LOT LINE
—
—
EASEMENT LINE
—
CENTERLINE
Al
LEE MOORE OIL CO
PIN: 0745541516
D.B. 11479, PG. 2471
B.M. 2005, PG. 1045
STRUNCK, CONLEY, ETAL.
PIN: 0745543536
D.B. 12358, PG. 2487
B.M. 2005, PG. 1045
KEP MORRISVILLE REALTY LLC
PIN: 0745449957
D.B. 8327, PG. 1777 t
B.M. 2005, PG. 1045
EXISTING
LAKE GROVE BOULEVARD
(VARIABLE WIDTH PUBLIC R/W)
P.B. 2007, PG. 1743_ —
t t Y�1
EXISTING WETLANDS
246 TOTAL STANDARD PARKING SPACES
PER CONDITION OF APPROVAL OF VARIANCE
18—V-03. NO BUILDINGS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED
BETWEEN LOT 10 AND THE 196' RADIUS SETBACK
FROM THE EXISTING CELL TOWER.
HWAC UNITS FOR PROPOSED BUILDING
WILL BE PLACED ON THE ROOF.
ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THE CURRENT NCDOT
AND TOWN OF CARY ENGINEERING
DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS
SEE SHEET C-2 FOR ALL SITE, UTILITY,
GRADING AND EROSION CONTROL NOTES
AND SPECIFICATIONS.
GRAPHIC SCALE
1 inch = 60 ft.
APPROVED by the Town of Cary
Development Review Committee
�� 1131
•
tt •
CO8
0'.3Z .
Cq
M
n+ !
(U� o x
8Z ■
C M
a)
0
VJ
CAR 41
V
aaaaaau,rr,rp�,
S
2
�L
z
0
W
O
d+
O O
O �
T \ CrJ 7G��
v
ado
W
Hr
E
H �wE-4
x
v H�C)
a
a �90
W IXI W
a
W x
A �
a a
�Q a
p
t� a
�a
O � �
1�
PROJECT No. GRE-17000
FMWAW: GRE17000-0AS1
CBECM BY: WHD
DRAWN BY: JB
SCMZ: 1 "=60'
DATE: 02-10-19
SUM NO. C-3
w
FINAL DRAWING — RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION
W1 WADAMS

a�
v
c
0
0
U
C
IL
rn
M
60
rn
0
04
o+
3
I
0
0
0
w
CY
N
O�
0
0
C
c
N
O�
C
3
0
0
c
0
U
c
0
C
c
0
0
0
0
r-
i
w
CY
i
w
CY
IL
N
U
.o
x
IN, EXISTING
HATCHES POND LANE
® \ EXISTING BUILDING //�/ //� ��\ oo \ \ \\ (PRIVATE)
35' TOWN OF CARYRETA
�// / / \ 3 WITH
UTILITY EASEMENT \\ RAIL I(DESI NNING A BYLL OTHERS)
THERS)
\ �j�AINIA 1/WITkf CURB TIE OAND ISGU TER AND
TING 24" ANDARD \ / / I \ <\
\ / \ ' �FENC�i (DES N BS' fd'fHERSY / \�� EXISTING ASPHALT (TYP.) �\JF \ \\ \ \
/ / / \s y \ 20' TOWN OF CARY UTILITY
\s� f�' Q��� \\ \ AND PIPELINE EASEMENT EXISTING POND z // �/ / �'� � \a�� \\\D.B. 8057, PG. 771
Q�®/ /�'' `� % . ,\ \ 24" STANDARD CURB
z �/// �/ AND GUTTER (TYP.) \\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
\ /// / �Y / ��' �� 0 R\ ' (TYP.)FIRELANE STRIPING\
\ / / / !✓ 1 �' �� �\ ' / \ / RETAINING WALL 4 WITH
FENCE (DESIGN BY OTHERS) I
3'R so S 5 11� / 100 STREAM BUFFER \ \
/ �-! 4" ViITE STOP \ o �.,
B WITH STOP 25'R\ F ��� �� / / (MEASURED 50' FROM TOP
//�,N (TYP) i / 3'R \ Q� OF BANK, EACH SIDE)
/?�%�'\�o' 40P SI N/ ' B 5'R�o�'oo \ / I \ I 50' STREAM BUFFER
(MEASURED
BANK, EACH SIDE) TOP
OF0 0
'DETECTABLE 5 \ \ g \ VARIABLE WIDTH TOWN OF
WARN\ SURF E •� �1 CARY UTILITY EASEMENT
'R •�`L P \ \ \31 jr VARIABLE WIDTH PUBLIC
/�" r' - �\o ��°so0 I VEHICLE ACCESS EASEMENT
\ \' 3'R G�� PEED LIMIT ��s / / \ TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION
SIGN
NR15 MPH \\ \ \ \ / / / / \\ \ EASEMENT
ACCESSIBLEro \ \\
\\ \ \ 18' L 'R \ 1 \ \ \ —� , / \ \ EASEMENT
STORMWATER
PEDESTRI
\ \\ N / � RETAINING 2 WALL • � '��s. \ \ \\ \ SIGN (W11AN2)
\/ c0 EAVY DUTY # • o \ \ / I 1
' ° ASPHALT WITH SAFETY RAIL • \ \'f'o •�� R \ WITH ARROW
DESIGN BY OTHERS EXISTING POND
(2) STEPS ( ) F \ �16-7P) / / I I I 1 \
\ I 3'R W/ HANDRAILS 4' WHITE PARKING \s �� \ \
3� "" • 22' EOP-EOP 24" STANDARD CURB
FIRELANE STRIPING LANDING (TYP.) • \ ` \ ��
5' CONCRETE SIDEWALK \ (TYP.) \`� Q x AND GUTTER (TYP.)
TO TIE INTO EXISTING \ \ • NL`�\ \ �� �— —1 / 1-1 I I I I \ I
HEAVY DUTY
10' PROGRESS \ \ \ ASPHALT 5' CONCRETE 2'
ENERGY EASEMENT \ SIDEW �f� '� ` / 4' WHITE PARKING \ \ VARIABLE WIDTH TOWN OF I D.B. 12096, PG. 1075 \ \ �� o I �/ LANDING (TYP.) I I I
\ \ \ \ • \ `�J \ \ `� ao\CARY GREENWAY EASEMENT
\ 4' WHITE PARKING • p ° N �
3' TOWN\ CARY STREET LIGHT \ POOL • \`� �y \ x° ri 6' CONCRETE r
EASEMENT O BE DEDICATED \ LANDING (TYP.) • o� s � I I
o + SIDEWALK + STORMWATER MANAGEMENT \
\ �\ 20' TOWN OF CARY R Ao c� o '
5'X8' CONCRETE \ A � \ Q N a FACILITY MAINTENANCE/ACCESS
BUS STOP PAD �� \ UTILITY EASEMENT ` 2' SPEED LIMIT �� /i \ STORMWATER I
\ V \ \ r ` 5 R\ SIGN 15 MPH FIRELANE/STRIPING EASEMENT \ \ \ " n /
\ \• \N 7\ AMENITY AREA "A" • ` — _ TYP.) �� RETAINING WALL #4 WITH CONTROL MEASURE A
\\\ \ COVERED CARPORT \ n UN Z (SEE SHEET LS-1) 5 R oQ 3 ( i�
WITH COLUMNS AND 83Z� \\ FENCE(DESIGN BY OTHERS) \ \\ \ /
\ A o `\ ,\ � \ (SEE SHEETS SW —Al THRU SW—A5)
\ MASONRY BASE \ c� w• 8 \ 7.5CONCRETE SIDEWALK
\ \\ BIKE RACKS L
• 0 R x �� ,ya \ /
\ \ \� \ O 4 SPACES) •� \� SPgCFS� — — — — — — — o,\ \
\ � ` 24" STANDARD CURB � \ � ( � 'R 5 R 5R
\ \� AND GUTTER (TYP.) y PEDESTRIAN \ V 0• SIGN (W11-2) 21+00
5' S •6 On�.r Sp 20 Q i \\\
\ \ \ q \ \ 20' TOWN OF CARY UTILITY /
\ ` WITH ARROW 64.44' R� CFS i 6' CONCRETE\\ \
\\ � 3'R/ � R _ 5 SPACES o SIDEWALK � AND PIPELINE EASEMENT
RETAINING WALL #1 WITH ' \ APARTMENTS (W16-7P) Co�O -� 10'R — — �4s\ \� / o \ y� D.B. 8057, PG. 771
HIGH VISIBILITY + 22' EOP-EOP
\ \ — 's 1055 HATCHES POND LANE �� • 5'R 5'R \ 6
FENCE (DESIGN BY OTHERS) \ 3'R � CROSSWALK • _ R�� �
\ \� STREETSCAPE BUFFE� \\ FIRELANE/NO 4' MIN
CLEAR PATH •• • HEAVY DUTY irl�
\ \ (30.5' AVERAGE WIDTH) \ \ / R _R FIRELANE STRIPING PARKING STRIPING • ASPHALT
\ \\ k COVERED CARPORT \ O (TYP.) (TYP.) WITH STOP & DO NOT
6' CONCRETE SIDEWALK 5'R
\ \� 5' CONCRETE \ \ ENTER SIGN (TYP.) ©
\ \O \ SIDEWALK \ \
\ SPEED LIMIT SIGN ACCESSIBLE PARKING 20' TOWN OF CARY
\` 20' MINIMUM 2 SPEED LIMIT \ \ \
\ STREETSCAPE 0' 9 22' EOP-EOP SIGNAGE TYP. UTILITY EASEME��NT//�� �j \ \`�S, 5'R SIGN 15 MPH
\ \\ \\ (7,930 SF) \\\ HATCHES POND LANE / \\C' \ R� \ \ \ \ FUTURE GREENWAY (DESIGN
\ L,, vn \ AMENITY AREA "B" / ES, \ VARIABLE WIDTH \ \ BY OTHERS)
\ \\ \\ R \ \� un TRASH ROOM WITH (SEE SHEET LS-1) (2) STEPS (PRIVATE) FENCE (TYP.) \ TYPE B BUFFER \ \ \
3' COMPACTOR AND W/ HANDRAIIE�iE SHEET -I DOG t \ (16,111 SF) %
ROLL -OUT BINS ACCESSIBLE PARKING w7� \ I r
\ SIGNAGE (TYP.) # PARK li\O \ VARIABLE WIDTH
\ I \
\ \ L \N RISER � RETAINING WALL 5A I �
ROOM I� P
• NEW LOT 9 WITH DOG PARK FENCE PUBLIC VEHICLE / I
6.93 AC. 305,383 SF WHEEDLESITGN BY OP WITHI
NOTHERS) S I \ i ��- y�l ACCESS EASEMEN j
3 R 2' OF CURB (TYP.�, N _
��HEEL STOP WITHIN 5 RISERS i �\ I - _ — STORMWATER \
�, © 2' OF CURB (TYP.) c c o \ \ EXISTING POND
Icn MANAGEMENT FACILITY \\
TAYLOR, ROBERT �/ 1 \ •o �O 6' CONCRETE SIDEWALK s C L \ �� MAINTENANCE/ACCESS \
PIN: 0745444852 \ `i t� V th \ \ T, GG m I� , T=23 EASEMENT
D.B. 15575, PG. 2283 \ `� gyp, N P _ a I� I \ \ VARIABLE WIDTH
\ EASEMENT OPEN TO \
\ \\ l o \ GG co c� z c� Ix c \ Atl( TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION
\ \ \ f rd \ 8' 5' 11' PEDESTRIAN SIGN (W11-2) EASEMENT FOR FUTURE
• 3'R - I I o \PUBLIC GREENWAY CONNECTION
\ AREA • �•• 3'R 3'R 8 SPACES 3'R 3'R 14 SPACES I��i m l I '' / WITH ARROW (W16-7P) \ \ \
\\ \\ -� \ \ •••• \ 9 �9 P S — —N — — WALL #5 WITH N R - - �,\ \ �` V • O C SQ GE I RAIL (DESI BY OTHERS) o! HIGH VISIBILITY \ \ \
\ \\ ✓� \ n ,�� i 3 R 10 SPACES 3'R 3'R 11 SPACES I 3'R 10'R DI A I II I A \
�C O CROSSWALK \
\ _u I — I\ \ \ NEW LOT 10
\ \\ \ \ f C / r 5 R ACCESSIBLE \
10' $ �I 1 I \ \\ 0 08 AC 3 600 SF
LOT 10 (CELL TOWER) BUFFER
REQUIRED
PROPOSED
AREA
16,000 SF
16,111 SF
DAVIS DRIVE STREETSCAPE BUFFER
AREA (SF)
LENGTH (LF)
NORTH
7,930
300
SOUTH
7,276
198
TOTAL
15,206
498
AVERAGE WIDTH (LF) 30.53
\\\ I \ B-B 9 m i x I RAMP (TYP.) 30, I \ 6O'X60' AS APPROVED 8 6 18 BY
\ \ 3'R 1O'R U) I 15' ACCESS
31 I I 3'R C i 1 5 R \PEASEMEN EDESTRIAN I C O NECNORY \ \\ i \THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT 18-V-03
\ / — SIGN (W11 --2) c0,%10t1d
�0'R 10'R WITH ARROW
O CR13 SPACES (W16-7P)
3NE STRIPING S'DK I PROPOSEDI I I
I P�ROPERTY
FIRELANE STRIPING LINE(TYP) 14 SPACES 3'�3'R 14 SPACES 3'��2 114 SPACES ACCESSIBLE oI (TYP) \ \\ \\\ \ \\
\ \\
I
\
TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION
RAMP TYP-) N
EASEMENT
\ I 6' CONCRETE �� \\ \ x\
\ 1�, �' 20 PRIVATE STORMWATER
MORRISVILLE REQUIRED I 10' 10' L
I I SIDEWALK \ \ \ ` EASEMENT
20' STREETYARD I g—g g—g B I ACCESSIBLE EXISTING 196' NON—STEALTH"� �'
\ \I25'R I RAMP (TYP.) MONOPOLE COMMUNICATIONS \�
r o � DETECTABLE ', 2 � � TOWER `�\ \ �\ \ ��
444.38' _ _ W_AR_NING SURFACE 1
\ \ \ I HEAVY DUTY PROPOSED PROPERTY LINE N90'00'00"w (SEE SHEET D-1) ��
6' CONCRETE X
\ \ RELOCATED 10' PROGRESS ASPHALT 20' TOWN OF CARY \ STOP SIGN WITH 1
UTILITY EASEMENT W4-4AP PLACARD 1 SIDEWALK STORM WATER MANAGEMENT �' ��
1 ENERGY EASEMENT ` I _______________________ _ __-- --_ \--------_ FACILITY MAINTENANCE/ACCESS \`�
D.B. 12096, PG. 1075--------------- '
— — — — — — — — — — — —
24" STANDARD CURB v'
��-� � 24' WHITE STOP BAR 11 EASEMENT \
------ TOWN OF MORRISVILLE
_ ___________�� AND GUTTER (TYP.) \ WITH STOP SIGN (TYP.)
TOWN OF CARY 30' TYPE B BUFFER \ 1 N90'00'00"E
1
\ \ 1 \ SO'00'00"E -A59.50' STUB ROAD FOR VARIABLE WIDTH TEMPORARY
\ 1 111 1 1 1 \ 17.66' Ul FUTURE EXTENSION CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT
TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION ' \ \
OFFSITE ROAD WI ING I CARY/MORRISVILLE �', + TEMPORARY BARRICADE / \'
f \
1 ANS BY KIMLEY HO \ 1 \ EASEMENT CITY LIMITS BOUNDARY 196' SETBACK \ of (SEE DETAIL 3000.25)
I;5H1�ETS RO.00-R6.03
1\ \ \ STREETSCAPE BUFFER \ p1 o
I \ \ 1 \ 1 1 \ (30.5' AVERAGE WIDTH) \ \ 11 o STORMWATER / I \ \
1\ 1 \1 I \ so'1376 ' 1 o CONTROL MEASURE "B" '
SITE LEGEND 1I I \ \ � 1 1 1-, ', -0
\
SIGNAGE 1 \ 1 I \ FUTURE DEVELOPMENT \ \ �� I (SEE SHEETS SW-61 THRU SW—B5) \ \
NEW LOT 11
YARD LIGHTS 1 I 5.78 AC. 251,577 SF
\I I \ 5' CONCRETE\ 1 =m
LIGHT POLE II \ I SIDEWALK
POLE POWER
E E \ 11 1 \ 34' STREETSCAPE
TRAFFIC DIRECTIONAL ARROW
ACC ACCESSIBLE PARKING STALL
1 S45000'00"E
ACCESSIBLE RAMPS 1 \ \
VAN VAN ACCESSIBLE PARKING STALL \ II I I I 3' TOWN OF CARY STREET LIGHT 1485 N90'00'00"w \
\ 1 1 �1II I\ I I I EASEMENT TO BE DEDICATED
1 s4.4s' \
\
1 \I ' I , �
' I
I1 \
TYPE ® TYPE© TYPE © � I
\ 1 I III 10 EASEMENT 20'
ACCESSIBLE ROUTE MENT
1 ' \ \ 20' PERIMETER BUFFER
FUTURE EXTENSION FROM HATCHES POND
LANE TO CONNECT TO HOLLY GRAVE BLVD. TO
BE DESIGNED WITH DEVELOPMENT OF LOT 11
.II�II�II�II�II. PHASE LINE \ 1 \ II 1------- — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
HVAC UNITS FOR PROPOSED BUILDING
PROPERTY LINE 1 �II� ; _ _ _ _ - WILL BE PLACED ON THE ROOF.
RIGHT—OF—WAY LINE
— — — — LOT LINE (� I .� 7— SEE SHEET C-2 FOR ALL SITE, UTILITY,
11 I, 11. I GRADING AND EROSION CONTROL NOTES
EASEMENT LINE AND SPECIFICATIONS.
CENTERLINE NOTES 24 TTOTAL STANDARD PARKING SPACES
1. NOTE: ISSD CALCULATIONS FOR INTERNAL DRIVEWAY CONNECTIONS FOR
HEAVY DUTY 15 MPH SPEED LIMIT WERE OBTAINED FROM 2011 AASHTO TABLE
ASPHALT PAVEMENT 9-6: DESIGN INTERSECTION SIGHT DISTANCE — CASE B1 & EXHIBIT
9-8: DESIGN INTERSECTION SIGHT DISTANCE — CASE B2 & B3
FIRE LANE STRIPING
PER CONDITION OF APPROVAL OF VARIANCE
18-V-03. NO BUILDINGS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED
BETWEEN LOT 10 AND THE 196' RADIUS SETBACK
FROM THE EXISTING CELL TOWER.
ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE IN GRAPHIC SCALE
ACCORDANCE WITH THE CURRENT NCDOT 40 0 20 40 80
AND TOWN OF CARY ENGINEERING
DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS a 1 inch - 40 ft.
M p
• �Cq
CqM �
d w von
z■
2zao
�0 u�`n
Cq M
I pl"
D)
VJ
� A
V
y:
42
eomo
��C H�;,,,�,,.
4
N
a
a
0
J �
J Q
Q �
U U
J p
3 a
o w
Z U
a ->
w of
LL w
� N
of
� 3
z
o 0
m m
N� N N
w
r-1
O
d�
O O
O �
z
ado
U
E-
Ey �WE_4
E 0
a �
Wiz
P4 O
a
O
7 � �
A U
O
O
as
F-1 �
W � a
a �
M�
�a
1�
Lf�
w � U
A
O
PROJECT N0. GRE-17000
FILENAME: GRE17000-S1
CHECKED BY: WH D
DRAWN BY: _
SCALE: 1 "= 40'
DATE: 02-10-19
SHEET N0.
C-4
�� MCADAMS
FINAL DRAWING - RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION

\+
\ \ \\ \ \ /// // • �C,,
\ \ \\` \ �/� �• 1� \� / 35' TOWN OF CARY
UTILITY EASEMENT
00
BW=365
00
op
SSMH
DIP I�ORMpPE� WT 5 .85
w 4 \ 10" DIP STO SE"kIN ul �°
® 1% MINPE
a�
c
0
0
U
C
E
IL
0
00
rn
0
04
3
v
c�
I
0
0
0
w
CY
N
O
c
3
0
0
C
a�
t
i
N
O
C
�3
0
0
c
0
U
C
0
0
v
c
0
0
0
0
r-
I
w
CY
i
w
CY
U
0
IL
IN, , \ EXISTING �' �'/ \
I HATCHES POND LANE �!�� /'�� j� EW=34 INV=34 RIM=35
� / �j / / INV=342.00 INV=343.80 RIM=356.45
/ INV IN=349.85 (CB-208)
\ / ( PRIVATE) i , i i �/ / CB-101 CB-201 INV OUT=349.35
\ FUTURE GR ENWAY / / �/ , / ' ` / T/C=349.45
BY OTHERS / / ��j i / / INV IN=344.15 (CB-102) T/C=352.68 CB-208
\ \ \ RETAINING WALL #3 WITH / / .sue i / INV IN=344.20 (CB-1
03) INV INV OUTOUT= 4344.40 T/C=357.20
(CB INV IN=350.15 (CB-209)
TW=364.00\ RAIL (DESIGN BY OTHERS) INV OUT=344.10
BW=361.00 A �' / i'�i �� / - A \ CB-102 CB-202 INV OUT=350.05
\ \ �' ��' \ \ \ T/C=349.45 T/C=353.33 CB-209
\ TW_364.33 \ \ \ \ EXISTING POND / / / j �� / \ \ / \ INV OUT=344.20 IINV IN=345.20 NV OUT 344.7pC6-203) T/C=357.35
BW=361.67 \ \ \ / // \.\ CB-103 INV IN=351.50 (CB-210)
T/C=351.95 CB-203 INV OUT=351.25
I 100' STREAM BUFFER / // i \ \ \ INV OUT 346 6INV IINN=346.90 bCB-104) NVC IN=346.50 (CB-204) CB-210
�\ - 2.22
TW=364.67 \\ ` (MEASURED 50' FROM TOP - / i /
\ /� \ \ INV IN=346.00 (CB-205) INV IN =351.75 (CB-21 1)
BW=364.00 \ �
OF BANK, EACH SIDE) / i CB-104 INV OUT=345.50
/ \ \ INV OUT=351.65
/ \ T/C=354.35
TW=360.00 CB-204
/ / BW=359.33 ' �' \� INV OUT 3492bCB-105) T C=352.17 CB-211
EX. SSMH / T/C=357.60
EX. 8" SS // 50' STREAM BUFFER �/� i'� �' INV IN=346.78 (CB-204A) INV IN=352.60 (CB-212)
/ (MEASURED 50' FROM TOP i / / CB-105 INV OUT=346.70 INV OUT=352.50
/ OF BANK, EACH SIDE) / �/ / \ T/C=355.55 CB-205
/ INV IN=350.55 (CB-106) T/C=353.58 CB-212
MANHOLE TO BE ADJUSTED TO FINAL INV OUT=350.45 INV IN=347.80 (CB-206) T/C=358.80
/ // A
TW=3 1.00 ROAD GRADE (TYP) / \ \ INV OUT=347.70 INV OUT=353.30
\ BW= 50 3 RETAINING WALL #4 WITH I ( CB-106 CB-206 EW-300
FENCE (DESIGN BY OTHERS) (/ \ / \ \ \ T/C=356.85 T/C=355.62 INV.=344.00
I \ INV IN=351.90 (CB-107) JB-301
\ - \ INV IN = 348.80 JB 207)
\ \ TW=j70.0 / // / I \ \ ( VARIABLE WIDTH TOWN OF / j/ 1 INV OUT=351.30 INV OUT=348.70 (-INV OU1.10
BW=3 / / �\ / / / / CARY UTILITY EASEMENT / \ \ INV OT=344.30
\\ 67.00 / /zv ASTORMWATER MANAGEMENT / / I ( \ \ T/C=356.65
FACILITY MAINTENANCE/ACCESS / / / \ / - EXISTING POND INV OUT=352.15
363.95 SNR \ TW=359.75 EASEMENT I \ \
0 BW=357.85 CE ® % BW=350.75
358.�O M SLOPE FUTURE GREENWAY
TW=359.00 BY OTHERS I \
\ / / TW 59.40 AREA DRAI \ \ 1 \ �-349.50
=357.85 (TYP)
/ - TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION ) `
\ FENCE RETAINING ESIGNLBY OTIHE \\ / / // VARIABLE WID PUBUC I \ \ \ \ � � � /�j / ( � � � jrj� � - ;'\ \ � \ EASEMENT � )
\ O / ( VEHICLE ACCESS EASEMENT-
/
PRIVATE STORM RETAINING WALL #2 DRAINAGE EASEMENTCB-211 (2) STEPS �W/ HANDRAILS WITH SAFETY RAIL 0` 14 LF 15" RCP (DESIGN B OTHERS) CB-106 \ - ss / - I' - I
P GRESS W 3 8. 0 \ ®5.10% 33 LF 15" CLASS I IV \ i I I� I I \ \ 20' TOWN OF CARY UTILITY
'F\RGY ASEMENT \ \ \ RCP ®0.76% =359. 0 \ �� ` , 7` �il \ \ AND PIPELINE EASEMENT
D. 120 PG. 1075 D.B. 8057, PG. 771
\ \ \ \ \ 12" PVC S OR SERVICE \ \ 355.80 / \ I j I I \ \`II VARIABLE WIDTH TOWN OF I
\ \ \ \ 3 ® 1% MIN SLOP \ \ ® / \ I I I \ \ I
358.50 CB-107 355.50 � �� I I � \ J \ CARY GREENWAY EASEMENT \ 62 LF 15" RCP W=346 00 I I I 4'X4' RISER STRUCTURE
3' TOWN OF CARY STREET LIGHT \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ T \0 1.22% FLUSH CURB 118 LF 15" RCP TW-353.00 �� � I \I j \\ (SEE SW SHEETS FOR
\µ, EASEMENT TO ,BE DEDICATED \\ \ \ \ 126 LF 15" RCP/ POOL 0 1.99% BW=345.50 i I _ \ OUTFALL INFO) I
\ \\ \ \ \ \ 0 0.60% `� TW=355.50
• \\ \ AREA DRAIN (TYP)/ \ BW=348.00 68 LF 15" RCP
20' TOWN OF CARY �_ \ - \ _ 0 1.63% \ \ STORMWATER J
\ \ \ \ \ UTILTY� EASEMENT / /
s" PVC STORM SERVICE r- �6-1o5 "'�CONTROL MEASURE "A"
® 1 % MIN SLOPE 356.5
\
\\ \ \ \ I (SEE SHEETS SW -Al THRU SW-A5)
\ \
^\ \\\ \ CARPORT \ \ \ \ o \ FFE=358.50' 356CB-1o3
.50 / 356.50
\ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ I \ 10" PVC STORM (SERVICE \�/® - _ - 1% MIN SLO/I E 355.75 \ CB-104 \ \ - \ - \ \ RETAINING WALL #4 WITH
\ \ \ \ \ \ 1 \ AM€ REA 'A" �.� (2) STEPS 30' TOWN OF CARD �3 ` \ /
CB-210 _l/ HANDRAILS S r'\\ / \ FENCE (DESIGN BY OTHERS) /
\ \ � ETAIN G WALL #1 WITH \ \ "I / (SEE SH�T'1=S�1) •�O st - - EASEMENT �` ` - /
\ \ \ "CE SIGN BY OTHERS) \\ \ 19 LF 15" RCP ( \ TW=351.00 \
\X,\\ �\ \ \ \\ \ 0 0.79% I \ 8" DIP STORM SERVICE ` BW\345.0
\ \ CB 209 TREE PROTECTION \
\ \ ® 1 % MIN SLOPE \ \ I \
\q \ \� \\ TW=366.00 \ \\ \ STREETSCAPE BUFFER_ ` (UNDER WALL) FENCE (TYP.)
\ \ \ \\\BW=359.25 \\ \ (30.5' AVERAGE WIDTH) APARTMENTS
\ / A \ EXTEND WALL \
\ \\\ \ \ \ \ \ PVC STORM SERVIC \ FOUNDATION
�\ \ \ \ \ \ I 0 T%-MIN,SLOPE 356.50 T -352.0 \ \ LOCALLY BELOW\ \ \
\ \ \ \\ \ \ 9 \ \ \ rcP \\ 356.50 ® Al "HE S POND ANE W- 52.00 \ \ \PIPE \ ,a\ \ \ \ / STORMWATER MANAGEMENT
\ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \ 8" PVC STORM AMENITY AREA "B `1 151 LF 18" RCP CB-101 \ VELOCITY DISSIPATOR w4D FACILITY MAINTENANCE/ACCESS
f \ A (PRMATE \ EASEMENT
\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ SERVICE 0 1 % SEE SHEET LS-1) ` 0 162% / _ _
SCAR 0 T \\\ \ \\ MIN SLOPE ( UE SHED P-1 356.00 \ \ \ ��' \ CLASS B RIP RAP "\ �\ \ VARIABLE WIDTH
R \58.50 AREA DRAIN (TYP) \FFE=356.50 s - / \ i I TYPE B BUFFER
\ \ g \ \ TW-356: 0 \
\ \ \ \ \ � � \ � \\ \ � _ _ _ _ _ -- • \ NEW LOT 9 D 0 G BW=.354. o \ � \ // \ � \ I I (116,1111 SF)
\ 178 LF 18" RCP s� \ 6.93 AC. \305,38 5F PARK \ \ \
0 0.62% LF 15" RCP \ �� / \ 20' TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT
� \ FOR FUTURE GREENWAY CONNECTION
\\ ST RM SERVICE � RETAININ WALL #5A WITH RAIL 1.00%
\PY� N� Y�-LI U 0 4.CONSTRUC�1 EING \ \ \ - h Q EW 100 \
PR( ED 6 RE IMED WA IN \ \ CLEA OUT (TYP.) TW=356. 0 W= 3 65 \
TO BE C0�1 E FRO VALVE \ \ \ \ \ \ \ (DESIGN BY THERS)
\ \ \ \ BW=354 60 BW=3 1.00 \ \
\ \ \ \\ \ \ r 358.50 r TW=350.00 \ EXISTING POND
I� \ \BW=345.00 \ FUTURE GREENWAY
STORM SERVICE BW=35I1.pO \ �\ \ BY OTHERS
\ \\ I 358.00 CLEANOUT (TYP.) _ A �\
\ \ \\ \\\\ 20' MINIMUM \ 10" PVC STORM SERVICE \ 350. 5 2 'plo PRIVATE GREENWAY \ \
\ \ \ \ \ STREETSCAPE \ 8" PVC TORM 0 1% MIN SLOPE FLUSH CU I \ E�F�1,ENT OPEN TO \
\ \ \ \ (7,930 SF) \ SERVICE 1% 1% FLUSH 'CURB \ ETAINING WA L 5 WITH 3 9.7� / PU I \ \ EXISTING 196' NON -STEALTH
\ \\ \\ \ IN SLOPE 8" PVC STORM SERVICE \ # A \ \ \ - MONOPOLE COMMUNICATIONS
1% MIN SLOPE Vi 12" PVC STORM R IL (DESIGi�I BY OTHERS) p 1
\ \ \ \ \ \ \ ^� i 29 LF 0-RING 18" RCP r' � TOWER
\ \ \ \ \ TW=365.00 \ - - I SERVICE ® 1% MIN I I 0 7 32%'
BW=358.75 \ 28 LF 18" RCP \ \ SLOPE
- I I o1 \ \ FUTURE DEVELOPMENT
0 0.71% 1 I I W 351.95 349.7 o I \ \ NEW LOT 10
I \ \ \ \ \\ \ \ CB-208 \ I 11 LF 0-RING 15" - 15' ACCESS I `A \
( \ \ \ \ TW=360.00 \ I I \ I 20 TOWN OF CARY RCP ® 0.63% I CB -20 EASEMENT I / I I I \ �\ \ i \0.08 AC. 3,600 SF
UTILITY EASEMENT
N 1 �_ 3512
\ \ � - � � C 04 I
\\ 20' TREETYARD 10" PVC STO M SERVIC ~- J��`'� s2 0 I VARIABLE WIDTH PUBLIC /I a� I \\ \ \ TEMPORARY GREENWAY
\ \ \\ \ \ \ I \ \ 5 ® 1% MIN SLOPE- I - 2.95% 351.30 I VEHICLE ACCESS EASEMEN r \ \ \ \ CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT
24 LF 0 RING 15 \
\ \ \ \ \ I - CB 206 CB-205 I RCP ®0.84% CB-20 ( I / �\ \ \ \\ ^ TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION
JB-207 1 I
I \ \ \ 1 TW-360.00 I 36 LF 0-RING 30" \ \ \ \ EASEMENT
\ \ \ \ REL CA D 10' PROGIR \ \ \ I BW=358.00 92 LF 24" RCP 137 LF 24" RC 136 LF O-RING 24" I351.80 RCP 0 0.84% I I I6 \ \ ��\ \�
\ \ \ ENE Y SEMENT f \ 351.40 352 \ �\
GRADING LEGEND \ \ I - ®o.so% \ - ®o.ss% RCP ® 1.25% 351.80
B. 09 , PG. 1075 \ Ilk
\\� \ \\ I 35 I \ CB-202 �\ \ �' \'
�\
\ \ \ \ I 1p � 1p
1 ( __ 3 8 - ( >
0 FLARED END SECTION \ \ \ \ \ \ 360
354 --� ��
SEE 0 I ROAD WI ENING I �-
/I PLANS 1� KIMLEY HORN 1 30' TYPE'B BUFFER 1 1 EW
U ENDWALL SECTION ( � Add ) \ 1 I 1 364 I-- ----------------------------------------- I
------=-------------------------- -
SHEET 00-R 03 '.. \ _ _ _ _ _ �--- ---------------------- \
CATCH BASIN \ \ �� 1 WV Is F TW=363.33 - � \ STUB ROAD FOR
\ \ \ TO TOWN OF CA U.E �T dl - d� - u r>7- - dl m dim dl - - d1).- RCP 0 0.82% 36"
_
DROP INLET I \ \ \ I 1 1 BW-358.00�1--dhLaT--� TW� 358.00 \ a I T, ' EXTENSION 24
I \ 1 \ 11 1 \ \ BW=357.33 I LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
■ STORM SERVICE INLET I \ \ \ I 1 \ / \
\ 1 1 \ I 20' PRIVATE STORM
_ TREE PROTECTION
1 I \ TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION \ I \ / \ \� DRAINAGE EASEMENT
• FENCE (TYP.)
STORM SERVICE ROOF -DRAIN I 1 11 f I 1 \ EASEMENT I \ l \ 3
I \ 1 \ 1 \ 1 CARY/MORRISVILLE \ I \ 40 \
O JUNCTION BOX \ \ 1 f \ \ I I \ \ I I \CITY LIMITS BOUNDARY \ \ I \\
�-- 1I \ 11 1 1 I \ \ \ DRAINAGE FLOW ARROW 61 LF 0-RING 36" \ VELOCITY DI;#IPATOR PA j \
I \1 \ 1 f I 1 1 \ \ \ \ \RCP ® 0.98% L=21;W=1119';T=18"
1 \ STREETSCAPE BUFFER \ CLASS B R RAP
(30.5" AVERAGE WIDTH)
ti LINE BREAK SYMBOL 1 I f I 1 \ II \ \ \ / 1
I l � - II II \ � _ \ \
I
250.50 \ 11 1 A 1 f \ \ \ I I' 196' SETBACK I \ \ �
250.00 TOP & BOTTOM CURB ELEVATIONS I I \ 1 1 I \ 1 1 \ \ \
TW=223.00 TOP OF WALL ELEVATION I I 11 1 I \I \ \ 1 - - - - - �I \ FUTURE \ I
VELOCITY DISSIPATOR PAD
I `, 1 _ �� I I FU U E I � / ��� � � L=18'; W=10.2'; T=18"
BW=213.00 BOTTOM OF WALL ELEVATION _ I II I i \
11 � I 1 / NEW L(�T 11 � / CLASS B RIP RAP
ELEVATION NOT OF WALWALL IS ROUND \ I \I I 1 I /251,577
1 � ( 34' STREETSCAPE / 5.78 AC. SF ( / � III
I `I I I (7,276 SF) I i STORMWATER _ _ _ STORMWATER MANA EMENT
I 11 11 I I I _- - - w CONTROL MEASURE "B'' EW-300 \ FACILITY MAINTENANCE/ACCESS
+ 250.60 SPOT ELEVATION 1 / / l I J I � � EASEMENT
STORM DRAINAGE II 1\1 1 4 r I �� / (SEE (SHEETS SW-B1 THRU SW-B5) I -
43 LF 0 . RING 36"
STORM SERVICE LINE I II 1 I� 1 / / I / / I RCP 0. o.ss% 4X4' RISER STRUCTURE
(SEE SW SHEETS FOR � \\
ROOF DRAIN, 8" ADS \ II 1 I I I/ 1 / / I o OUTFALL INFO) /\
- RD - RD - RD - \ I I \ / 3' TOWN OF CARY STREET LIGHT / / / `� \
NON -PERFORATED TUBING OR I r 111 I EASEMENT TO BE DEDICATED
EQUAL 1. % SLOE 3MIN.P ' 0 ° MIN. -
COVER PVC SCHEDULE 40 IN \ \ 1 y £ 1 I I / / / / / / / \ d4 - dl -UT--Al m dl - d} \
TRAFFIC AREAS 1 \-301 \\
-TP -TP -TP - TREE PROTECTION FENCE / i0s I I\ I I \ f 40 DUKE
EASEMENT ENERGY
LD LD LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE i � \ � 1 \ ' / I � I 1 20' PERIMETER BUFFER
WOODED AREA 7 � BUILDING FLOOR ELEVATIONS
W \ / /
LEVEL 5 401.13
250 MAJOR CONTOUR\\,\ I 1 \\ I� I \ \ \ /
f _ i / / LEVEL 4 390.47
\ \ _ _ -- -- - _ _ �i LEVEL 3 379.82
252 MINOR CONTOUR I / �- \ \I \ _ -__ - -� _ -- SEE SHEET C-2 FOR ALL SITE UTILITY LEVEL 2 369.16
(I I \ 1 I - -- > , LEVEL 1 356.50/358.50
250EXISTING MAJOR CONTOUR 1I I \ / \\� - > > / GRADING AND EROSION CONTROL NOTES
I �
252_______ EXISTING MINOR CONTOUR I I 11 / I �� /I AND SPECIFICATIONS.
EASEMENT LINE
ACCESSIBLE PARKING AREA
(2% MAX. SLOPE IN ALL DIRECTIONS)
ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE IN GRAPHIC SCALE
40 0 20 40 80 0
ACCORDANCE WITH THE CURRENT NCDOT
AND TOWN OF CARY ENGINEERING
DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS 1 inch = 4o ft.
FINAL DRAWING -
M p
• �Cq
CqM �
3o
d • von
z■
00zao
O0 Lo Cam)
0)
Cq
M
fir^
VJ
� A
V
�N OAR �0
�1-42
01\ qM ...�F.
� w
w F
� a
U � d
>
w 0 w
w a o
Q
� (3 cr
U
O
N 3 a
z o w
Z Z U
a a >
J w Cr
3 w �
0
U Q
o w
d N �
U� 0) N
Z7 o
O o 0 0
N N N
aaa
O
d�
O O
O �
C3 4
ado
U
N
E-� W E_4
� a E-1VlCn
Wiz
a
0
� ��
W
A U
U)
a
z 0 C7
0 z
a a
Q A
5
F
M�
a
>•I
A � z
V
O
PROJECT N0. GRE-17000
FILENAME: GRE17000-G1
CHECKED BY: WH D
DRAWN BY: J B
SCALE: 1 "= 40'
DATE: 02-10-19
SHEET N0.
C-5
RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION
�� MCADAMS

CONTAMINANT OVERLAY MAP

00
0
N
0
/
v
4
S ,/
/ ,
/ _' \
PROPOSED PROPERTY
LINE /
♦ \ I
� A3
A7�0
\\ \ 20'-0" UTILITY Al
\ EASEMENT \ \
CARPORT #1 \ \\ \ \ Al
(9) SPACES \ \ \ \ �\\ \—,
(HATCHED AREA) \ \ \ Al
RE: 1 /A1.38 \ \ \ \
PROPOSED PROPERTY \ \
LINE \ \ \
10'-0" PROGRESS
ENERGY EASEMENT
NOTE: THE MARKUPS ON THIS DRAWING WERE ADDED
AFTER THE ORIGINAL DRAWING WAS SEALED. MARKUPS
FOR ILLUSTRATION ONLY.
TAI
•
om
A2 X
A2
Al
\
\
Al
'� \
CARPORT #2
(8) SPACES
\
PUMP
ROOM
(HATCHED AREA) \ \
RE: 1 /A1.39 \ \
\
MAINT.
ROOM
\
RISER
ROOM
\ \ \
TRASH
ROOM
\
\
\ \
C4
G
I
1
I
1
,
GENERAL SITE PLAN NOTES:
1. REFER TO CIVIL PLANS FOR ALL DIMENSIONS 6. REFER TO LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS FOR POOL
\ OF SURFACE PARKING AND PAVING, AS WELL & COURTYARD LAYOUTS, PLANTING, RETAINING
\ \ \ AS FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATIONS AND SURFACE WALLS, DECORATIVE PAVING, ETC.
\ \ SITE DRAINAGE.
2. REFER TO LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT AND CIVIL FENCE. GAT SIN. SHABLL BIE GH SELOFO CLOSINGS& E
PLANS FOR CURB RAMP LOCATIONS AND SELF —LATCHING, SHALL HAVE COMPLIANT
DETAILS. ACCESSIBLE MANUV. CLEARANCES & SHALL
3. PROVIDE HANDICAP PARKING STALLS IN OPEN AWAY FROM POOL. (RE: LAND. DWGS)
ACCORDANCE WITH APPLICABLE ACCESSABILITY 8. DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE FOR REFERENCE
STANDARDS. ONLY, REFER TO CIVIL DRAWINGS FOR EXACT
4. REFER TO CIVIL DRAWINGS FOR ACCESSIBLE BOUNDARY DIMENSIONS AND DIMENSIONCONTROL PLAN.
/ PARKING SIGNAGE.
5. REFER TO STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS FOR 9• FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATIONS ARE INCLUDED
FOR REFERENCE ONLY, REFER TO CIVIL
FOUNDATION PLAN & TYPICAL DETAILS. DRAWINGS.
PROJECT
SITE
DENOTES LOCATION OF ACCESSIBLE ROUTE DENOTES LOCATION OF ACCESSIBLE
\ I \ \ I LAKE GROVE BLVD INTO BUILDING. MAINTAIN MAXIMUM RUNNING ENTRANCES INTO BUILDING.
SLOPE OF 5% AND MAXIMUM CROSS SLOPE
VICINITY MAP OF2%.
N.
UTILITY \ UTILITY AND PIPELINE EASEMENT
\/\ \ \ EASEMENT
\ STAIR #4
\ \ \ FUTURE GREENWAY PATH
i
_ I
i 1
\� \ \ ♦ \\ �� _ - PROPOSED PROPERTY LINE
POOL PAVILION
RE:1 /A1.40
COURTYAtBt
00 A \ V A
STAIR #2 — _ _ — ,' PROPOSED PROPERTY LINE \ 'N \\
® POOLROOM
----�- - - - - - - - - _ \\ \ \
B4- - - - — - - - - - - - - - - -
O VAS\ \ \ \ \\ \\ \ \
�\
CLUBHOUSE
yA 0 - \\/ \ \ \\
ORM WATER
/O A9 A2 B 1 B2 \\ \ MA GEMEN \ \
/ \ \
/ � \ FACI ITY "A" \ \
EEO STAIR #1 \ \ \ \
B 1 COURTYARD,
®A ® A3HC DOG
/ A3 B 1 PARK
B2 � �
B2 / I-- - -- _---- --� -
OUli
B2 z I • _---- ---� N, \�\
STAIR #3 200' CELL TOWER FALL ZONE -I I I \ \ \
-- C,
C I
I I I I I EXISTING CELL TOWER
I I �
I I
20'-C" UTILITY EASEMENT \
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
PROPO D PROPERTY LINE —
TOWN OF MORRISVILLE_ _
TOWN OF CARY
SITE PLAN
I I I
f5 30 0"
PROPOSED PROPERTY LINE
\
`0_11H 1CARo��'.
'.
oFEss/o
ti
L
,p ARCHITECT
0UID0 M0���
pp,RT/V
C)
�: w SEAL �A•.o
'W 51838 0; _
d =;
�/ y•. MORTHCARD�;��P. c
III
W
Q
0
0
z
0
z
U
Ld
w
Z 0
O�
u� w
wN
Ld
QC,
o�
0
z
C
f
W L
a
Zrn
O U
fr co � � m
0
O X � a
Q N co+
0 co
O N �� OD
MAIN o
U)
y
W
W
® 00)
z a
02)
� Q
o
0
JOB NO.: 17014
FILE NAME: 7010102
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
X ISSUED FOR PRICING
X ISSUED FOR PERMIT
ISSUED FOR CONSTRUCTION
DRAWING NO.
A1.02

CUT AND FILL DIAGRAM

i
N
I I I PG I \ \ \ \ \ \\ , MDS
`-- \ \N�-
1> - - X�* "\
+13.2 13. 0.
+12.53+12.69+1
\ �.
\ \\ � I 1.7 .18 .0 1. 11%8 + 12. .41 + s. 4. .o:
j5�1 4 .7 in + 9. 11.02+ 9 +�0 +10.10+9. 52 +1 ^
364
\ \ \ 4\ 8.0 + + le
+9. 9.44 • • +9. +9. 1 +\' . + 510
\ `Q6.)6
I /
+ .45 ++ \�+746 7.56 + + 6 + 7 36 64
+.9 4+ 12 +5. +5.66 +6. + 26 .2 \+ 6. 7�39 / 34 4 43
2 + +4.11 "4.39 +4. 5 + . +3.21 +3.6\4 +4.2 7 7.03 7.43 7 �o � \ 1 \ p362
+ 3,20 + .7 3 +2.02 +2.15 +2.52 +3.0z 4. 9 .1 + +7r 7. 7 +' \ I
1.88 + 7 + + 1.29 + 1.39 + 1.22 �K1.16 + 1.45 + 1.96 # 2.66 + : + 6. V +\
1 + �:8
+0.0 + 0.94 + 0.93 + 0.82 +0.74 +0.69 +1.30 .94 +2. 6 + • •. + 0.01 + 1.04 .05 0. 0.71 + 0.62 + 0.53 + 0.45 0.3 0.98 + n .83 + 2.78 + + + FS 6.59 ?s + ^ \ �_��� s6lp
O � SS
V A V A \ 64 + 7.08 + 0 �72 + 0. 16 + 4 + 0.44 + 0.48 + 0.52 0.55 1.07 1.98 + 2.96 3 94 + .93 6.4 \ 1 /� V A \ 8. 1. �• V A,' �� \
ss -Joe
\ \
\\ \\ ` \\ ;\\ 3 +� 1 +1 +1.14 +0 + .44 +0.11 +0.10 +0.191+0.28 +1 31+2.15 +3.17/+4.16 +5.17/+5.8 6. + 9 • • \\ / \ +103
7��\ \
\ \`�\\ \ \ \ \\ \+ .45 +6. 1.84 1.5 1.381 1.13 .46 +0.17\ +/ -7 +0.86 +1. +2.49 +3.4$ +4.40 +5.2 +5.78 +6. 1 + ,ic + 9 S. 7
ou
\ \ \� \ 2 + 23 + 1. fi 1. ou + + 0. + _ ... + 1.34 2.09 2.85 + .74 + 4.64 + 5. 3 + 0 6.5: + ' 6 94 + + Q + + 6.70 + 7 + 7. + 2.24 .77 .28 +
\ \ \ + .51 + 1 1.82 +1. +1.2 �� 4 + + + 14 +4.0 4.67 +�.14 +5.55 +6.09 + +6. 6-1 + � +-- *- + + +6.9 6.6 0.95 +�?.22 +1 +1. 19 +3.7 3.
+1. 1 +0.9 1 +1.10 +1.8p +2.52 +3.3 + 7 +4.95 �.5� +5.30 +5.39 +5.39 +5.3 5.36 S +5. 5 + .53 +�F{60 7� - �+ t3 + .92 + + 6.� 9 +0.91 +2,
\\ \ \ !• ` \ \ \ \ \ \\ + 7.7p + + �0 + 8 + 1 _ + 1.16 + 1.P6 + 2.69 + 3.62 + 4.1 + 4.63 + 4.76 + 4.71 + 4.65 + 4.61 + 4 63 4.62 + t _ + ... + + + 4 4.54 + n + + 5.65 + o.' 5 +.97 6.29 4.88 .5 <2.03 + 3. + 2.7d +1. 4 + 3. 2. •. \ \ \ \ \ \ /
+2.06 1.9 1.11 .22 0. +1.11 +1.7 +2.51 +3.4045 .05 +4.00 +3.95 +3.91 +3.94 +3.94 +3.93 +3.90 +39 + 98 +3.90 +4.30`k4.6 +4.64 +5.1� +5 +6.6 + + +5. �� 15 .2 +2.56 3.43 2. 7 + 30 3 8 \ \
\\ \\\\\ 4 \ \ \\ \�.22 + 76 8 99 +1.58 \+2.19 +2.87 +3.00 +3. +2.98 +3.03 +31Z -21 +\.18 +3.13 +3.13 +3.22 +3.41 + \ +7.56 6.�+5. � .26�+ '�S 0 + .36 + .155 6 +3. 5 13
+1.04 +1.56 +1.91 +1 +1 9+1.83_+1.9 \ 9 +2.08 +2.17 +2.24 +2.3�\2.53 +2.72 +3.12 +3�3 +4.49 +5.32�+6.17 +6.94 +7.75 +8.57 +9.20 �F.�,+6. 0 < + 2 +y 0 +0 2. \3.8 +2.09 + .57
\\ \
0.7 0.14 0 32 .1 + .28 + 0.46 + 0.87 + 0.91 + 0.87 0.81 + 0.74 + 0.86 �, 1 + 1.34 + 1.57 + 1.82'4-,2,03 + 2.48 + 3.21 \+ 4.03 + 4.87 + 5\710 + 6.52 + 7.35 +\7.99 + 8. .14 +76.22 + 1 3. 6 • + 31 0.99 1. 4 4. 5 + 36
1 +1. 0. +0.64 +0.20 +0.14 +0.17 + .27 +0.3 027 +0.14 +0.037 +0.85 +1.07 +1.29 +1.91 +2.73 +3.53 +4.37 +5.24 +6.13 +6.85 +7.44 8.0 .21 +5.43,+4.54 + .6 0.1 R I. 5 78 + .06 t 4.02 61 I
6 1.88'+3. +2.91 2. 1 1.77 +1.41 +1.41 +1.39 +1.40 +1.41 +1.40 +1.32 +1.10,3 +0.58 +0. +`0,28 +0.68 +1.42\+2.19 +3.03 +3.97 +4.88 5.71 +6.30 +6.85 +7. / .45 +4.86 +4.17 +3. 6 0 + + .64 +�.40 +2. 8 0. \+ 2 +\?-
\ \ \ \ \\ \ !c \ \ \ \ + + + &5 O 4{4.0 19 + 7 + 2.64 + 2.67 + 2.65 + 2.59 + .30 + 2.�6 + 2.24 + 1.63 + 1.3 + 1.05 + 0.39 0.10 + 0.77 + 1.59 + .56 + 3. 8 + 4.14 + 4.74 + 5. + 5.69 + J.72 + 4.24 + 3.50 + 2. 1 +0 5 .69 + .6 + 1 + 4 64 + + 3.29 +U. \2 + 0.
0.7 \ 1. / +I 1,\+3.8 + 2 +3-79-+3:92-+3$2 +3.71 2 2. +1. 1.3 + .91 +0 6 0.1 + 1.90, 1.8 + .43 +3. 1 3. + 3.27 + 6 A.1 + .02 +3. 2 4 !.22 0. 3 +0. 4 .4 .0 �+ 0 2.\ +3.93 +2.89 +1.5 089 + 3
.3 4.69 .26 4. + 4.52 + 4.57 .41 + \ + 4 07 3.5 + .99 .56 + 2.1 + 1. + 1.17 + 0\.69 + 0.05 9 + 1.57 + 2.82 + 3.2 3.61 + 3.56 + 3.15 2.51 + .8 I 0. •8 I .92 I + .0 + 5 1. 75 + 0. l \ I \ \ \ a \ 1
\ \ \ \ \ \ \ 4 ( + + 5.31 �91 + 4.9 4 + + 6 + 8 + 73 4.82 + 4.47 +ik.03 3.49 + 2.87 +.28 + 1.82 + 1.33 0.90 + 0.02\+ ^ �� 23 \+ 1.94 + 2.27 + 2.67I + 3.13 + 3. + 2.82 + 2 + 1. 0 .19 + .7 1 1 I I \ ` \ \ I \
4.11 1 +5. +5. 0 5.8 5. +5.27/+5.32
.35 6.52 6.48 + 0 6.311 .2 + 6.09 5.8 + 2
\+ .2 •6.88 o.65 +6.6 +6.21
+ 4.38 +\i.!.:
3.35
+ 2
�1
q9
2.
9 +
1.86
\
+ p
40
+ 5.2 +
79
4
2 +
3.71
+
20
2.
3 +
1.97
* 1
I
53
5.43
+4.61
+3.71
+3.5
I+2.96
+2.35
�F1.7
! +
+0.
3 4
1.
+1.92
+2.
2.
+
.�2
+ U.
9 4
1.0
+1
- 4
j
t.6
+ 2 9 + .02-' 1 28 1. 6 .33 + .0 I x 1 \ \ \\ \
I I
+1 7 + .09 + - • ! 78 1. 3 .5 + .3 \ O� x/
. + .5 0.09 + 0.39 + 0.84 + 1.OA +1. 1 95 4160 + 0. 0 9 + 1. 4 + 1.1 I x
\ \ \\ \ \ \1 \ +\ s • 3.31 0 + 1. 1 +1. +0I+\ X J X
.+7.54 7.46 +6.98 6.56 +5.74 +4.90 +4.02 +3.54 +2.71 2.12 +1.48 +0.98 +0.58 +0.18 +0.26 +0.2 +( +++0.1
\ I \\ { \\\ \ \ 4 \\\ \ +0. I� .13 + 7.8 18 2 .84 + 97 5. 8 +4.19 +345 3. 3.11 +230 1. + 0 +1. 1 0.6 + .2� + 0. 4 0.1 + .03 +0. 5 0. +0.91 2 + 5
I \ \ \\\ \ \ \ \I \ + 7 + /+ 7.45 + 1 .22 + 8.58 + 8.03 + 7.85 + 6.89 + 5.98 + 5.09 29 + 0.54 + + -.^; 1 �o + oa a + + ).46 + 0.86 + 2 + 0 3.6 + 9 0.53
\ \ 9.41` - \ iC
- --
59'11' I3•E \ \ \ \ N90'00'00'W
\ S• \ 30. 5' \ \ / 3.62 8 + 1.91 + 1.0 6 0.22 + + 1.53 + 0.76 + 0.46 1 2 1 J6.02 7. 5.
364 L \ \
1 8 +4.15 +3.21 +2.24 +122 +0. 2. 0 7I38 + 6 + .2 + 3 \ \ \ \
\ N44 30' 12"W I \ \\
\ 1 \ \ 1 1 I \ \ \ 1 1 \ \ \ \ + + + 6.6 4. +I .7 + .4 + 8. 5 3. 0. X \ \
�+1 5 +CO7 +1 6.19 3 +10.20+ .13 + 8 fi. fi 3.� \ \ \
V A v I
1 \1 \ f 11 1 II I \ I I \ \ \ \\ \\ / I/ +113 + .6 +6.64 53 +5.5 +7. +7.3 6.
lum'� 9 10. + .1 5. 6VpI /
\\ \ \ 1 \ 1I I \ \ \ / W l a
1 \ o +062 1 + + 9.56 +8.14 + +0.29 7. + + 0
�ase Surface EG1 \ \/ No
\ 1\\I li --Ah I II Cbmpa6 ison S�rface PG 1 i i � � N +0 , + .5 +6 / ,,.5s+1 /48+s.21 /I-a.o, +1.10 0 0.8 + .7 02 0 + .2
11 1 1 I \� \ P
1 �11 \ 1 I I Illgi __Cu,t Factor 1 000
�66- I I / / +0 9 + .1 +5 11.18+10.46\+ +8. .80 + .1 4. 1-- 5. 91 1 \ \
FyI'I Factor 1 .000
I � + 0. 1. ++4. . - 3.08 + 1.9 :93 0 9 .08 5 8 \
Cut volume (unaljusted) 12i802.84 Cu.l Yd. / I \ \
Fill v,6lume (unadfusted) 2811 44.42 Cu! Yd. / I Az +°. �n ^ +A, C., \
1 1 A
N/,41volume (unjusted) 1 51341 .58 Cu// . Yd. <Fil'I> I I i1.95 + 2.45 + 2.92 + 3.32 + 3.69 + 394v + 4.23 + 4.58 + 7 + .9 v �
, �A-
� \ l\
_l
GRAPHIC SCALE
ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE IN 40 0 20 40 80
ACCORDANCE WITH THE CURRENT NCDOT
AND TOWN OF CARY ENGINEERING 1 inch = 40 ft.
DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS
PRELIMINARY DRAWING e NOT RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION
CO p
•3��
U x `, N
a0Vb
duo
b z•
00 iz �o
-3 IL) LO U
N co
rnr^
V J
V
O
7
W a
0
C? �
C:) CQ
CeD�
L;Wz
a 0
E-
�wE-4
a U)
� W � Z
�y 04 0
a
O
14
W x
A U
X
z
z
a
� o a
U
O
O
wz
p�y
w
0
PROJECT NO- GRE-17000
FILENAME: GRE17000-E2
CHECKED BY: WH D
DRAWN BY: J B
SCALE: 1 "= 40'
DATE` 02-22-18
SHEET N0.
E-2
9 MCADAMS

PERMITS

A
APRt® n"
LOPMENT SERVVCEs
ENMONMENTAL GRADING
WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT
Permit No.: 8 Approved Bye
Comments: Fee: $4000
Permit Issue Date: 3/22/2019 Affected Basin:
Denuded Area in Acres: 8
This is to certify that owner Greystar GP II, LLC has received approval from the Town of Cary to
engage in land disturbing activities at Overture at Twin Lakes 1@-9Pv4W8.
Location: 1055 Hatches Pond Ln
This ENVIRONMENTAL PERMIT is issued and accepted subject to the following conditions:
1. All soil erosion and sedimentation control devices shall be installed in accordance with Town of
Cary Standard Specifications and Details.
2. The Town of Cary may inspect the site at any time following the issuance of this Permit and may
require additional measures to be installed in lieu of or in addition to those measures shown on
the approved Soil Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan where deemed necessary.
3. Grading permits that denude one or more acres must comply with the National Pollutant
Discharge Elimination System. This grading permit covers you under the general permit
regulated by the State of North Carolina Division of Water Resources.
4. Applicant must call 460-4934 or 462-3886 for an on -site inspection and receive a CERTIFICATE
OF COMPLIANCE for Soil Erosion and Sedimentation Control prior to proceeding with site
grading, utility installation, and building permit application.
5. A copy of the approved Soil Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan and this Permit must be
available on -site at all times.
6. Any failure to execute the provisions of this permit, the approved Soil Erosion and Sedimentation
Control Plan, or any other provisions of the Soil Erosion Control Ordinance shall result in
immediate legal action by the Town of Cary to the limits prescribed by the Ordinance.
I hereby qcknowledge and accept all conditions of this Permit as listed above.
C ' t1
Signature of Permit Holder
Representing
° Date
Receipt No. By:
I�
TOWN O/ CARY
316 North Academy Street •Cary, NC 27513•PO Box 8005•Cary, NC 27512-8005
te1919-469-4030 • fax [phone] • www.townofeary.org

CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE

GxEYS
O R V R L O P M R N T
® CONSTRUCTION. L.P.
AN", &A
®®®®®®®®®®
®®
®®
PlIpItsd Finish
®
®®mom
ate■■a��ea■■■■■■aa■
o5/06120
■tee■■■■■■■�
13120
o
■■
1
aa■
■tee■■■■■■■
/a■■■�■■■■
0
■tee■■■■■■■■■■aaaa■
■tee■■■■■■■
17120
■■
1
aa■

TABULATED DATA SUMMARY

TABLE 3.1
SUMMARY OF CHEMICAL CONSTITUENTS DETECTED IN SOIL
OVERTURE CARY
CARY AND MORRISVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA
BROWNFIELDS PROJECT NUMBER 22002-18-092
MID -ATLANTIC JOB NO.: R3021.01
SAMPLE ID
Action
UNRESTRICTED
PROTECTION OF
INDUSTRIAL
CHEMICAL CONSTITUENT
SB-1
SB-2
SB-3
SB-4
SB-5
SB-5
SB-6
BG-1
HA-1
HA-2
HA-3
Level
HEALTH BASED
GROUNDWATER
PSRG (mg/kg)
(4.0'-5.0')
(0.0'-2.5')
(2.5'-5.0')
(3.0'-3.5')
(2.5'-5.0')
(Dupe)
(0.0'-2.5')
(0.0'-2.5')
(2.5')
(3.5')
(3.5')
(mg/kg)
PSRG (mg/Kg)
PSRG (mg/Kg)
TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS (DIESEL AND GASOLINE RANGE ORGANICS) Sampled November 21, 2018
Diesel Range Organics
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
39.8
1,255
515.9
100
Gasoline Range Organics
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
5.1
209.7
115.2
50
VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS (METHOD 8260 B) Sampled April 15, 2015
Acetone
<0.0018
0.022J
<0.0012
0.019J
1 0.0043J
1 0.0075J
1 0.018J
I NA
I NA
NA
NA
12000
25
140000
2-Butanone (MEK)
<0.0017
<0.0017
<0.0011
0.0026J
1 <0.0010
1 <0.00093
<0.0013
1 NA
I NA
I NA
I NA
1
1 5500
1 17
1 40000
SEMI -VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS (METHOD 8270D) Sampled April 15, 2019
Benzo(a)anth race ne
<0.055
<0.066
<0.051
<0.052
<0.050
NA
0.077J
NA
NA
NA
NA
1.1
0.35
21
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
<0.049
<0.059
<0.045
<0.046
<0.044
NA
0.171
NA
NA
NA
NA
1.1
1.2
21
Benzo(a)pyrene
<0.045
<0.055
<0.042
<0.043
<0.041
NA
0.054J
NA
NA
NA
NA
0.11
0.12
2.1
Chrysene
<0.053
<0.064
<0.049
<0.050
<0.048
NA
0.111
NA
NA
NA
NA
110
36
2100
Fluoranthene
<0.053
<0.064
<0.049
<0.051
<0.049
NA
0.14J
NA
NA
NA
NA
480
670
6000
Pyrene
<0.055
<0.067
<0.051
1 <0.053
<0.050
NA
1 0.241
NA
NA
NA
NA
360
440
4500
RCRA METALS (METHODS 7471A & 6010B) Sampled April 15, 2019
Mercury
<0.022
<0.027
<0.020
<0.021
<0.020
NA
<0.020
<0.021
NA
NA
NA
2.3
1
9.7
Arsenic
<0.17
5.5
1.9
1.6
<0.15
NA
2.6
3.1
NA
NA
NA
0.68
5.8
3
Barium
15
41
35
37
26
NA
59
250
NA
NA
NA
3100
580
47000
Cadmium
<0.043
<0.052
<0.089
<0.041
<0.039
NA
<0.039
<0.40
NA
NA
NA
14
3
200
Chromium III/Chromium VI
4.5
26
14
8.6
4.8
NA
26
21
NA
NA
NA
2300/0.31
36000/3.8
35000/6.5
Lead
8
10
20
8.8
5.4
NA
9.7
15
NA
NA
NA
400
270
800
Selenium
<0.35
<0.42
<0.32
<0.33
<0.32
NA
<0.32
<0.33
NA
NA
NA
78
2.1
1200
Silver
<0.039
<0.047
<0.036
<0.037
<0.036
NA
<0.36
<0.036
NA
NA
NA
78
3.4
1200
Notes: All concentrations reported in mg/Kg Bold = Concentration exceeds Action Level or
mg/Kg = Milligrams per kilogram Protection of Groundwater PSRG
PSRG = Preliminary Soil Remediation Goals (February 2018) Highlighted = Concentration exceeds Unrestricted Health Based PSRG
J = The identification of the analyte is acceptable; the reported value is an estimate Border = Concentration exceeds Industrial PSRG
B = The same analyte is found in the associated blank (1.5'-25) = Sample Depth, feet
J4 = The associated batch QC was outside the established quality control range for accuracy Dupe = Duplicate Sample
J6 = The sample matrix interfered with the ability to make any accurate determination; spike value is low = Not applicable
NE = Not established
NA = Not analyzed

SAMPLE LOCATION DRAWING

10
FORMER AST
- -
�LG
DRO (ppm)
GRO (ppm)
1
39.8
5.1
2
1,255
209.7
3
515.9
115.2
G
8260
827Q
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
I.,. . ... W IM
M
yG
LEGEND
(n
HANDAUGER
O SOIL BORING
❑ SOIL BORING AND TEMPORARY WELL
i
O SUBJECT SITE
O PARCEL BOUNDARY
0 30
60
—
Feet
DRAWN BY: RDC
DATE: APRIL 2019
SAMPLE LOCATION MAP
DRAFT CHECK
idAtlantic
OVERTURE CARY
Bv:
JOB NO.: 00OR3021.01 T40000
3612 & 3624 DAVIS DRIVE
BYGINEERCHECK
GIS NO.: 01G-R3021.01-4
Engineering &Environmental Solutions
MORRISVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA
BYPROVED
DRAWING NO.: 2.2
REFERENCE: DATA FROM WAKE COUNTY COUNTY GIS. MID -ATLANTIC FIELD NOTES.