AS-340_5550_CA_RPTS_20141024_ContaminantFateAndTransportModeling

GROUNDWATER MONITORING
AND CONTAMINANT TRANSPORT
MODELING REPORT
PALMER STREET TEXACO,
NCDENR INCIDENT NO. 5550
196 W. PALMER STREET
FRANKLIN, MACON CO, NC
S&ME PROJECT NO. 4305-14-152
OCTOBER 24, 2014

Prepared for:

North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Waste Management
Underground Storage Tank Section
1637 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699
Attention: Sharon Ghiold

Prepared by:
S&ME, Inc.
44 Buck Shoals Road, Suite C-3
Arden, North Carolina 28704

___________________________ _______________________
David R. Loftis, P.E. Edmund Q.B. Henriques, L.G.
Project Manager Senior Reviewer

S&ME is licensed to practice geology/engineering in North Carolina. Geology License Certification #C-
145 and Engineering License Certification #F-0176.
Groundwater Monitoring and Contaminant Transport S&ME Project No. 4305-14-152
Modeling Report - Incident No.5550
Palmer Street Texaco, Franklin, Macon County, NC October 24, 2014

i

TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. FEDERAL/STATE LEAD MONITORING REPORT ............................................1
2. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .........................................................................................2
3. SCOPE OF SERVICES ...............................................................................................4
3.1 Contract Information ......................................................................................... 4
3.2 Approved Scope of Services ............................................................................. 4
4. SITE HISTORY AND CHARACTERIZATION .....................................................5
4.1 UST Owner and Operator Information ............................................................. 6
4.2 UST Owner and Operator Information ............................................................. 6
4.3 Description of the UST Release ........................................................................ 7
4.4 Site Characteristics............................................................................................ 7
4.5 Owners and Occupants of Adjoining/Nearby Properties and Land Use........... 8
4.6 Receptors/Potential Receptor Information ........................................................ 8
5. CURRENT SITE ASSESSMENT INFORMATION ...............................................9
5.1 Current Liquid Levels ....................................................................................... 9
5.2 Groundwater Monitoring Report ...................................................................... 9
5.3 Summary of Groundwater Assessment Information......................................... 9
5.4 Regional and Site Geology and Hydrogeology ................................................ 9
5.4.1 Soil and Bedrock ................................................................................... 9
5.4.2 Hydrogeology ...................................................................................... 10
5.5 Evaluation of Soil and Groundwater Assessment Information ....................... 10
5.5.1 Current Extent and Severity of Contamination ................................... 10
5.5.2 Cleanup Levels Achieved.................................................................... 10
6. CONTAMINANT TRANSPORT MODELING .....................................................11
6.1 BIOSCREEN Inputs ....................................................................................... 11
6.1.1 Hydrogeology ...................................................................................... 11
6.1.2 Dispersion............................................................................................ 11
6.1.3 Adsorption ........................................................................................... 11
6.1.4 Biodegradation .................................................................................... 12
6.1.5 General ................................................................................................ 12
6.1.6 Source Data ......................................................................................... 12
6.2 BIOSCREEN Results...................................................................................... 12
7. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ...................................................13

Groundwater Monitoring and Contaminant Transport S&ME Project No. 4305-14-152
Modeling Report - Incident No.5550
Palmer Street Texaco, Franklin, Macon County, NC October 24, 2014

ii

FIGURES
1 Site Location Map
2 Topographic Map
3 Site Layout Map
4 Well Location Map
5 Groundwater Quality Map
6 Groundwater Elevation Map

TABLES
1 Monitoring Well Construction and Liquid Level Data
2 Adjacent Property Owner and Receptor Information
3 Current and Historical Groundwater Analytical Data
4 Summary of BIOSCREEN Results

APPENDICES
I Well Sampling Field Forms
II Site Photographs
III Laboratory Analytical Report and Chain of Custody Form
IV Slug Test Analysis
V BIOSCREEN Input and Output
Groundwater Monitoring and Contaminant Transport S&ME Project No. 4305-14-152
Modeling Report - Incident No.5550
Palmer Street Texaco, Franklin, Macon County, NC October 24, 2014

2
2. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Summarize the most pertinent information for the monitoring period presented in this
report:

1. Free product thickness:

Maximum thickness (ft): None
Monitor well: Not applicable
Date: June 26, 2014

2. Maximum concentrations of groundwater contaminants and North Carolina
Groundwater Quality Standards (2L Standards):

Contaminant
2L
Standard
(µg/L)
Concentration
(µg/L) Well ID Date
Benzene 1 45.7 MW-3 6/26/14
Ethylbenzene 600 108 MW-1A 6/26/14
Toluene 600 20.2 MW-1A 6/26/14
Total Xylenes 500 168.4 MW-1A 6/26/14
sec-Butylbenzene 70 3.9 MW-1A 6/26/14
Diisopropyl ether 70 4.4 MW-3 6/26/14
MTBE 20 115 MW-3 6/26/14
n-Propylbenzene 70 70.3 MW-1A 6/26/14
Naphthalene 6 76.7 MW-1A 6/17/14
1,2,4,-Trimethylbenzene 400 125 MW-1A 6/26/14
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 400 24.4 MW-1A 6/26/14

3. Current extents of dissolved groundwater contamination compared to the
historical extents:

Contaminant concentrations in the groundwater have generally decreased since
the previous sampling event conducted on August 16, 2012. The downgradient
portion of the groundwater contaminant plume is not delineated and is migrating
towards Crawford Branch, located approximately 30 feet from the most
downgradient monitoring wells (MW-3 and MW-4).

Groundwater Monitoring and Contaminant Transport S&ME Project No. 4305-14-152
Modeling Report - Incident No.5550
Palmer Street Texaco, Franklin, Macon County, NC October 24, 2014

3
4. Potential receptors and risk of impact (list by receptor ID as appropriate):

Distance
from
source (ft)
Municipal
Water
Available
Active
Drinking
Water Well
Unknown
Status
Water
Well
Active,
Non-
Drinking
Water
Well
Surface
Water
Body
0 – 500 Yes 0 0 0
1 (NW,
Crawford
Branch)
500 – 1,000 Yes 0
1
(900 feet
SW, H.C.
Bueck
Trustee)
0 0

5. Indicate possible pathway to closing the UST Incident:
a) Perform additional investigation to determine the use of the water supply well
location 900 feet southwest of the source area.
b) If the water supply is determined to be inactive or if the property can be
connected to the municipal water system, the incident should be classified as
Low Risk and eligible for closure with a Notice of Residual Petroleum.

Groundwater Monitoring and Contaminant Transport S&ME Project No. 4305-14-152
Modeling Report - Incident No.5550
Palmer Street Texaco, Franklin, Macon County, NC October 24, 2014

4
3. SCOPE OF SERVICES
3.1 Contract Information
The scope of services for this report was performed in general accordance with S&ME’s
proposal number 43-1400561, dated 6/18/2014.The scope of services was authorized by
the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources (NCDENR’s)
Task Authorization 5550-01, dated 6/18/2014, and within contract number N14005i.
3.2 Approved Scope of Services
S&ME’s approved Scope of Services for this Task Authorization included the following:

 Sampling of four monitoring wells (MW-1A, MW-2, MW-3, and MW-4);
 Slug tests at two (2) monitoring wells; and
 Contaminant transport modeling to predict maximum contaminant levels in the
site groundwater to be protective of surface water quality in the downgradient
stream, Crawford Branch.

These services were completed as proposed.

Groundwater Monitoring and Contaminant Transport S&ME Project No. 4305-14-152
Modeling Report - Incident No.5550
Palmer Street Texaco, Franklin, Macon County, NC October 24, 2014

5
4. SITE HISTORY AND CHARACTERIZATION
The site location and vicinity are shown in Figure 1 and Figure 2. The site and pertinent
features are shown on Figure 3.

On December 17, 1986, the Macon County Health Department reported to NCDENR that
gasoline was noted in Crawford Branch at the intersection of Palmer Street and Maple
Street. On December 18, 1986 and December 22, 1986, NCDENR staff investigated the
site and found gasoline seeping into a culvert across Maple Street from the Palmer Street
Texaco. Tank tightness test were performed on the three (3) 10,000-gallon USTs and
none of the USTs passed the test.

On March 7, 1987, the USTs were replaced with three (3) new steel tanks; two (2) 8,000-
gallon USTs and one (1) 6,000-gallon UST. On April 28, 1987 a monitoring well was
installed onsite and petroleum compounds exceeding the 2L Standards were detected.

On April 12, 1990, NCDENR staff investigated the site after receiving a report of
gasoline entering a culvert ditch. Excavation of the UST product lines confirmed a
release from a loose fitting near a dispenser. As a result, five (5) monitoring wells (MW-
1, MW-2, MW-3, MW-4, and MW-5) were installed onsite. The monitoring wells were
sampled in July 1990 and March 1991. Petroleum compounds were detected above the
2L Standards in all of the onsite wells, with concentrations in monitor wells MW-1, MW-
2, and MW-3 exceeding the Gross Contamination Levels (GCLs).

On April 29, 2008, Hart and Hickman (H&H) sampled the onsite monitor wells. MW-1
was gone due to new construction, and MW-5 was filled with mud and could not be
sampled. Contaminant concentrations detected in monitor wells MW-2, MW-3, and
MW-4 had decreased significantly since the March 1991 sampling event. However,
exceedances of the 2L Standards were detected in each of the three onsite monitor wells
with the greatest concentrations detected in monitor well MW-3.

On September 25, 2008 the site was inspected by NCDENR and was reported as being
abandoned. Conversation with the property owner revealed that the USTs had failed their
Cathodic Protection test in June 2007.

Previous assessment activities do not identify water supply wells within 1,000 feet of the
site.

On July 26, 2011, S&ME collected groundwater samples from monitoring wells MW-2,
MW-3, and MW-4. The depth to water was approximately 4 feet below ground surface
(bgs) in each of the monitoring wells. Samples from monitoring wells MW-2 and MW-4
contained several petroleum contaminants less than their respective 2L Standards. No
contaminants were detected a concentrations above the GCLs or the surface water quality
standard by more than 10 times for Class C streams.

On January 5, 6, and 9, 2012, S&ME was on-site to observe the removal of the UST
system (3 USTs) by NEO Corporation (property owner’s contractor). No holes were
Groundwater Monitoring and Contaminant Transport S&ME Project No. 4305-14-152
Modeling Report - Incident No.5550
Palmer Street Texaco, Franklin, Macon County, NC October 24, 2014

6
observed in the tanks and no evidence of a release was identified in association with the
USTs. Two (2) sets of product piping were observed during removal of the UST system.
S&ME observed removal of only one of the sets of product piping by NEO Corporation.
S&ME observed strong petroleum odors in the soil beneath each of the four (4) product
dispensers. S&ME was not present to observe the over-excavation of the petroleum
impacted soil; therefore, no over-excavation soil samples were collected for laboratory
analysis. Approximately 34 tons of petroleum impacted soil was removed between the
northernmost pump island and monitoring well MW-3 and transported off-site for
disposal.

Total petroleum hydrocarbon (TPH) gasoline range organics (GRO) concentrations
exceeding the NCDENR action level of 10 mg/kg were detected in five of the UST
system closure samples with the greatest concentrations being detected in soil samples
collected in association with the former dispenser islands.

On August 15, 2012, four (4) soil borings were performed using direct push techniques in
the vicinity of the former dispenser islands. Contaminant concentrations exceeding the
Soil-to-Groundwater (STG) Maximum Soil Contaminant Concentrations (MSCCs) but
less than the residential and industrial/commercial MSCCs were detected in each of the
collected soil samples. On August 15, 2012, S&ME observed the installation of
monitoring well MW-1A at the former location of the northernmost dispenser island.

On August 15, 2012, S&ME identified one (1) water supply well located approximately
900 feet southwest of the source area (see Figure 4). The well is located on property
owned by the H.C. Bueck Trustee and addressed as 145 W. Dogwood Drive. Crawford
Branch (a class C stream) in the Little Tennessee River Basin was identified
approximately 30 feet north of the former dispenser island (the nearest source area). The
portion of Crawford Branch immediately north of the subject property is transported via a
culvert; specifically on the properties addressed as 233 W. Palmer Street, 24 Commerce
Street, and 181 W. Palmer Street.

On August 26, 2012, S&ME collected groundwater samples from monitoring wells MW-
1A, MW-2, MW-3, and MW-4. The concentrations of several petroleum compounds in
monitoring wells MW-1A, MW-2, and MW-3 exceeded the 2L Standards but less than
the GCLs. The contamination concentrations generally decreased when compared the
data from the July 2011.
4.1 UST Owner and Operator Information
The subject property has contained two (2) generations of USTs removed in March 1987
and January 2012, respectfully. The former owner/operator of the USTs was Blevins Oil
Company.
4.2 UST Owner and Operator Information
The first generation of USTs was comprised of three (3) 10,000-gallon gasoline USTs
while the second generation of USTs was compromised of two (2) 8,000-gallon gasoline
Groundwater Monitoring and Contaminant Transport S&ME Project No. 4305-14-152
Modeling Report - Incident No.5550
Palmer Street Texaco, Franklin, Macon County, NC October 24, 2014

7
USTs and one (1) 6,000-gallon gasoline UST. The former location of the second
generation USTs that were removed in January 2012 is depicted on Figure 3.
4.3 Description of the UST Release
 Date discovered: December 17, 1986

 Cause and Source: Leaks from the three (3) 10,000-gallon gasoline USTs.

 Date Discovered: April 12, 1990

 Cause and Source: Release from a loose fitting near a gasoline dispenser.

 Date Discovered: January 6, 2012

 Cause and Source: All four gasoline fuel dispensers.
4.4 Site Characteristics
 Land Use of Site: The site is currently not in use with a vacant store building.
Historically the site has been utilized as a service station.

 Land Use of Surrounding Area: The land use of the surrounding area includes
mostly commercial development.

 Topography: The site is relatively flat with a gently slope to the north. Refer to
Figure 2 for a USGS Topographic Map.

 Vegetation: The driveway leading to the canopy is covered with asphalt
pavement. The remaining portions of the property are covered with grass.

 Surface Water: Crawford Branch, a Class C stream is located immediately north
of the subject property (see Figure 4).

 Wells: No water supply wells are located on the subject property; however, one
water supply well (use is unknown) is located within 1,000 feet (~900 feet) of the
source area.

 Buildings: The site contains an approximately 575 square foot structure which is
currently vacant.

 Surface Cover: The surface cover at the site is a mixture of grass and asphalt
pavement.

 Soil Type: Soils underlying the site are part of the Udorthents-Urban land
complex with 0 to 5 percent slope.

Groundwater Monitoring and Contaminant Transport S&ME Project No. 4305-14-152
Modeling Report - Incident No.5550
Palmer Street Texaco, Franklin, Macon County, NC October 24, 2014

8
 Depth to and Nature of Bedrock: According to the 1985 USGS Geologic Map of
North Carolina, the site is located in the Blue Ridge Physiographic province.
Bedrock in this area is characterized as biotite gneiss interlayered and gradational
with biotite-garnet gneiss and amphibolite; locally abundant quartz and alumino-
silicates. Depth to bedrock has not been determined.

 Depth to Groundwater in Source Area: Depth to groundwater measurements at
the site ranged from 3.61 feet below top of casing (ft-BTOC) in monitoring well
MW-2 to 4.28 ft-BTOC in monitoring well MW-3. Groundwater depth and
elevation measurements are summarized in Table 1.

 Direction of Groundwater Flow: Based upon measurements collected on June 26,
2014, groundwater at the site flows generally to the north. Figure 6 graphically
depicts the approximate groundwater flow at the site based upon the June 26,
2014 measurements.
4.5 Owners and Occupants of Adjoining/Nearby Properties and Land
Use
Details regarding the adjacent properties are summarized in Table 2. The land use of the
surrounding area is generally commercial.
4.6 Receptors/Potential Receptor Information
Details regarding water supply wells located within 1,000 feet of the source area are
provided in Table 2 and the location of the water supply well is shown on Figure 4. The
well is located on property owned by the H.C. Bueck Trustee and addressed as 145 W.
Dogwood Drive. The well is located approximately 900 feet southwest of the source
area. The use of the water from the well has not been confirmed. No additional potential
receptors have been noted within 1,000 feet of the source area.

According to the Town of Franklin Water and Sewer (TFWSD), municipal water is
available to properties within 1,000 feet of the site provided by the Town of Franklin. On
October 25, 2012, Mr. Jay Gibson, TFWSD Director, indicated that TCWSD water lines
were present throughout the area within 1,000 feet of the subject property.

Groundwater Monitoring and Contaminant Transport S&ME Project No. 4305-14-152
Modeling Report - Incident No.5550
Palmer Street Texaco, Franklin, Macon County, NC October 24, 2014

9
5. CURRENT SITE ASSESSMENT INFORMATION
5.1 Current Liquid Levels
On June 26, 2014, S&ME was on-site to gauge liquid levels in monitoring wells MW-1A,
MW-2, MW-3, and MW-4. The depth-to-water ranged from 3.61 feet ft-BTOC in
monitoring well MW-2 to 4.28 ft-BTOC in monitoring well MW-3. Groundwater depth
and elevation measurements are summarized in Table 1. The groundwater elevations
based upon the June 26, 2014, measurements are depicted on Figure 6.
5.2 Groundwater Monitoring Report
After measuring the depth-to-water, S&ME personnel purged each monitoring well with
a disposable polyethylene bailer by evacuating three well volumes or until the well was
dry. After approximately three well volumes the monitoring wells were allowed to
recharge and to allow for settlement of suspended sediment.

After completing the well purging, S&ME personnel collected a groundwater sample
from the monitoring wells. The groundwater samples were placed in laboratory-supplied
containers, stored in a cooler with ice, and shipped under chain-of-custody procedures to
Pace Analytical Services, Inc. (Pace), a North Carolina certified laboratory for laboratory
analysis. The groundwater samples were analyzed for volatile organic compounds
(VOCs) by EPA Method 6200B.

Copies of the monitoring well sampling field forms are included in Appendix I.
Photographs of the site taken on June 26, 2014 are included in Appendix II.
5.3 Summary of Groundwater Assessment Information
The monitoring well sampling results are summarized in Table 3. Review of the
laboratory analytical results for the samples collected on June 26, 2014, indicated
concentrations of benzene greater than the 2L Standards in monitoring wells MW-1A,
MW-2, and MW-3. Naphthalene was detected at concentrations greater than the 2L
Standards in monitoring wells MW-1A, MW-2, and MW-4. Methyl tert-butyl ether
(MTBE) was detected in the sample collected from monitoring well MW-3 at a
concentration exceeding the 2L Standards.

None of the contaminant concentrations were detected at more than 10 times the North
Carolina Surface Water Quality Standard (2B Standards).

Figure 5 graphically depicts the contaminants detected at concentrations above their
respective 2L Standards in the groundwater samples collected. A copy of the laboratory
analytical results is included in Appendix III.
5.4 Regional and Site Geology and Hydrogeology
5.4.1 Soil and Bedrock
The Macon County Soil Survey report suggests that soils underlying the site are part of
the Udorthents-Urban land complex with a 0 to 5 percent slope. According to the 1985
Groundwater Monitoring and Contaminant Transport S&ME Project No. 4305-14-152
Modeling Report - Incident No.5550
Palmer Street Texaco, Franklin, Macon County, NC October 24, 2014

10
USGS Geologic Map of North Carolina, the site is located in the Blue Ridge
Physiographic province. Bedrock in this area is characterized as biotite gneiss
interlayered and gradational with biotite-garnet gneiss and amphibolite; locally abundant
quartz and alumino-silicates.
5.4.2 Hydrogeology
On June 26, 2014, rising head slug tests were performed on monitoring wells MW-2 and
MW-3. The collected slug test data was analyzed using the Bouwer and Rice Method.
Appendix IV contains the analysis results.

Analysis of the data collected as part of the test at monitoring well MW-2 and MW-3
yielded hydraulic conductivity values of 8.95 x 10-5 centimeters per second (cm/s) and
2.68 x 10-4 cm/s, respectively. The average hydraulic value based on the slug test results
was 1.79 x 10-4 cm/s.

Based upon measurements collected on June 26, 2014, groundwater at the site generally
flows northward with an approximate gradient of 0.05 feet per foot (see Appendix V).
Figure 6 graphically depicts the approximate groundwater flow at the site based upon the
June 26, 2014 measurements.
5.5 Evaluation of Soil and Groundwater Assessment Information
5.5.1 Current Extent and Severity of Contamination
Based on the historic soil sample data obtained via the completion of soil borings in the
vicinity of the former dispenser islands, residual soil exists with concentrations exceeding
the STG MSCCs but less than the residential and industrial/commercial MSCCs. The
extent of the contaminated soil zone is unknown.

Groundwater contamination is currently present in all of the monitoring wells on the
subject property. A comparison of previous groundwater analytical data suggests a
general reduction in contaminant concentration over time. The downgradient extent of
the contamination is unknown but likely intersects Crawford Branch. Because the
immediate downgradient portion of Crawford Branch is encased in a culvert, direct
contact of the shallow groundwater to the Crawford Branch is likely limited.
5.5.2 Cleanup Levels Achieved
 Soil (STG MSCCs) No
 Groundwater (2L Standards) No

Groundwater Monitoring and Contaminant Transport S&ME Project No. 4305-14-152
Modeling Report - Incident No.5550
Palmer Street Texaco, Franklin, Macon County, NC October 24, 2014

11
6. CONTAMINANT TRANSPORT MODELING
Fate and transport modeling was used to estimate the impacts of naphthalene on
Crawford Branch. Crawford Branch is located within the Little Tennessee River Basin
and is classified as a Class C stream per the NCDENR Division of Water Resources.
Class C waters are protected for uses such as secondary recreation, fishing, wildlife, fish
consumption, aquatic life, and agricultural. As such, the NCDENR Division of Water
Resources recommends that, for Class C streams, the most stringent 2B Standards
presented for the protection of freshwater and the human health should be used.

Naphthalene was selected as the modeled contaminant of concern as naphthalene was
detected in the sampled monitoring wells at the highest concentration (76.7 g/L at MW-
1A) relative to the respective 2B Standard of 12 g/L for protection of freshwater
aquatic life. Benzene was detected at a maximum concentration of 45.7 g/L in the
groundwater compared to 51 g/L 2B Standard for the protection of human health.
MTBE was detected at a maximum concentration of 115 g/L compared to a NCDENR
2B Standard for the protection of human health of 1,500g/L.

BIOSCREEN was used to predict the concentrations of naphthalene in the groundwater at
the downgradient intersection of Crawford Branch. BIOSCREEN is a software package
developed by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) and is used
to simulate the natural attenuation (i.e. natural decay) of petroleum compounds dissolved
in groundwater. The data used for the BIOSCREEN predictive simulation is summarized
in Table 4 and Appendix V and discussed in Section 6.1.
6.1 BIOSCREEN Inputs
The following sections provide a brief description of the inputs for BIOSCREEN.
6.1.1 Hydrogeology
The seepage velocity value was entered based on the finding discussed in Section 5.4.2.
The seepage velocity calculations are included in Appendix V.
6.1.2 Dispersion
Dispersion is a term used to describe the dilution of contaminants as it mixes with
uncontaminated groundwater during migration. Dispersion effects will cause the plume
to spread in the horizontal, transverse, and vertical directions and will essentially dilute
the concentration of the contaminant. Dispersion effects are quantified using
dispersivity, which is multiplied by the seepage velocity of the groundwater. Dispersivity
can be estimated using length of the contaminate plume. For modeling purposes, S&ME
assumed that the length of the plume will not exceed the distance from the source area to
Crawford Branch. BIOSCREEN uses the assumed plume length to calculate
dispersivity.
6.1.3 Adsorption
Adsorption occurs when contaminants are sorbed to organics (i.e. carbon) in the soil.
This adsorption effect slows or retards the flow of contaminants. For modeling purposes,
Groundwater Monitoring and Contaminant Transport S&ME Project No. 4305-14-152
Modeling Report - Incident No.5550
Palmer Street Texaco, Franklin, Macon County, NC October 24, 2014

12
S&ME assumes a retardation factor of 1, which assumes that adsorption is not taking
place. Most soils contain organics that will retard the flow of contaminants; therefore,
this assumption provides a higher than expected contaminant concentration as calculated
by BIOSCREEN.
6.1.4 Biodegradation
Biodegradation is the process by which hydrocarbons are degraded by naturally occurring
microorganisms found in the subsurface. For this modeling effort, S&ME assumed that
1st order decay of the dissolved naphthalene. According to Handbook of Environmental
Degradation Rates, the half-life for naphthalene ranges from 24 hours to 6,192 hours.
For modeling purposes, S&ME used the average of the published values for the half-life
of naphthalene; 3,108 hours or 0.35 year.
6.1.5 General
This section of BIOSCREEN requests information regarding the modeled area, such as
modeled area length and modeled area width. For the modeled area length and width,
S&ME imputed 50 feet and 47 feet (distance from MW-1A to Crawford Branch),
respectively. Following model runs, S&ME determined that the maximum naphthalene
concentration at the interface of the groundwater and the stream occurs approximately 5
to 6 years into the model run.
6.1.6 Source Data
S&ME assumed that the saturated thickness of the contaminant is 25 feet, more than
twice the depth of the monitoring wells on the site. Since most petroleum compounds
reside near the water table surface, this input is conservative.

S&ME assumed that the width of the contaminant at the source area is approximately 50
feet and that the entire width of the contaminant at the source area has a naphthalene
concentration of 76.7 g/L (measured in the sample collected from MW-1A). The
naphthalene concentration of 76.7 g/L was modeled since it represented the greatest
concentration detected from the on-site monitoring wells.

Field observations and groundwater data do not suggest the presence of free product at
well MW-1A. However, for modeling purposes, S&ME assumes that approximately
2000 kilograms (4400 pounds) of Non Aqueous Phase Liquid (NAPL), or free product, is
available as a secondary source to produce additional dissolved petroleum contamination.
The 2000 kilogram value was chosen since BIOSCREEN defaults to a source half-life of
>1,000 years at this value. This assumption will allow BIOSCREEN to predict a higher
than expected contaminant concentration. Again, because free product was not detected
at the site, this input is conservative (overly protective).
6.2 BIOSCREEN Results
Based on the BIOSCREEN simulation, after approximately 3 years, the naphthalene
concentration at the groundwater/stream boundary reaches a steady state concentration of
6 g/L. The BIOSCREEN output is provided in Appendix IV and summarized in Table
4.
Groundwater Monitoring and Contaminant Transport S&ME Project No. 4305-14-152
Modeling Report - Incident No.5550
Palmer Street Texaco, Franklin, Macon County, NC October 24, 2014

13
7. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Based on the current and historical assessment information for the site, the following
conclusions are presented:

1. The UST Incident meets the following conditions for a High Risk classification:

a. There is one (1) drinking water supply wells (900 feet SW) within 1,000
feet of the source area. The use of the well is not confirmed. Municipal
water is available to the properties within 1,000 feet of the source area.

b. Contaminant levels in the groundwater exceed the 2L Standards for
benzene, MTBE, and naphthalene in the monitoring wells.

2. Contaminant levels in the samples collected from monitoring wells are generally
decreasing over time.

3. Residual soil exists with concentrations exceeding the STG MSCCs but less than
the residential and industrial/commercial MSCCs in the vicinity of the former
dispenser islands.

Contaminant transport modeling suggests that the steady-state concentration naphthalene
at the intersection of Crawford Branch would be approximately 6 g/L. The predicted
concentration of naphthalene is equal to the 2L Standard but less than the 2B Standards
for naphthalene; 12 g/L for protection of aquatic life. S&ME performed the modeling
with a conservative approach; specifically when accounting for the model inputs that
were unknown and were assumed. S&ME defines the conservative approach has being in
a manner that would overestimate the resultant naphthalene concentration at the
groundwater/stream interface. Examples of conservative assumptions are provided
below:

 The effects of adsorption were assumed to be negligible when in reality most soils
contain organic materials that will indeed retard the migration of contaminants.

 An infinite amount of soluable naphthalene mass is available at the source area.
This is believed to be the most conservative assumption since this means that the
source material will always be present and will never degrade.

Considering that the modeling exercise included conservative inputs and the resultant
naphthalene concentration is far below the corresponding surface water quality standards,
the model suggests that migration of the naphthalene contamination from the area in the
vicinity of MW-1A has a low potential to cause impacts to the adjoining stream, as
measured by an exceedance of the surface water standards.

Based on the above, the following recommendations are presented:

Groundwater Monitoring and Contaminant Transport S&ME Project No. 4305-14-152
Modeling Report - Incident No.5550
Palmer Street Texaco, Franklin, Macon County, NC October 24, 2014

14
1. Determine if the water well 900 feet southwest of the source area is an active or
inactive potable water supply well. If the well is an active potable water supply
well, assess if the user can be connected to municipal water such that the incident
can be reduced from being an NCDENR a High-Risk site to a Low-Risk site.

2. No additional assessment and/or remediation activities in association with the
petroleum-contaminated groundwater are warranted.

3. The site should be eligible for closure under a Notice of Residual Petroleum, if
the incident can be re-classified as Low-Risk.

FIGURES
SCALE:
DRAWN BY:
DATE:
PRO. NO:
FIGURE NO.
WWW.SMEINC.COM
ENGINEERING LICENSE NO: F-0176
1PALMER STREET TEXACO
196 W. PALMER ST., FRANKLIN, NC
INCIDENT NO. 5550
LOCATION MAP
SITEAS SHOWN
AUG. 2014
JDO
4305-14-152
SUBJECT PROPERTY
SCALE:
DRAWN BY:
DATE:
PRO. NO:
FIGURE NO.
WWW.SMEINC.COM
ENGINEERING LICENSE NO: F-0176
2PALMER STREET TEXACO
196 W. PALMER ST., FRANKLIN, NC
INCIDENT NO. 5550
MAP
TOPOGRAPHICAS SHOWN
AUG.2014
JDO
4305-14-152
SUBJECT PROPERTY
GRASS AREA
GRASS AREA
GRASS AREA
GRASS AREA
MW-1
MW-2
MW-3
MW-6
MW-5
MW-4
8000 GAL. UST
6000 GAL. UST
STORE
WEST PALM
E
R

S
T
R
E
E
T
MAPLE STREETMW-1A
SCALE:
DRAWN BY:
DATE:
PROJECT NO:
FIGURE NO.
WWW.SMEINC.COM
ENGINEERING LICENSE NO: F-0176
3PALMER STREET TEXACO
196 W. PALMER ST., FRANKLIN, NC
INCIDENT NO. 5550
MAP
SITE LAYOUTAS SHOWN
AUG. 2014
JDO
4305-14-152
APPROXIMATE MONITORING WELL LOCATION
PREVIOUS MONITORING WELL LOCATION (NO LONGER ONSITE)
LEGEND
SITE FEATURES TRACED FROM 2010 AERIAL IMAGE PROVIDED BY MACON COUNTY MAPPING DEPARTMENT.
GRASS AREA
GRASS AREA
GRASS AREA
GRASS AREA
MW-1
MW-2
MW-3
MW-6
MW-5
MW-4
8000 GAL. UST
6000 GAL. UST
STORE
WEST PALM
E
R

S
T
R
E
E
T
MAPLE STREETMW-1A
SCALE:
DRAWN BY:
DATE:
PROJECT NO:
FIGURE NO.
WWW.SMEINC.COM
ENGINEERING LICENSE NO: F-0176
5PALMER STREET TEXACO
196 W. PALMER ST., FRANKLIN, NC
INCIDENT NO. 5550
MAP
GROUNDWATER QUALITYAS SHOWN
AUG. 2014
JDO
4305-14-152
APPROXIMATE MONITORING WELL LOCATION
PREVIOUS MONITORING WELL LOCATION
LEGEND
SITE FEATURES TRACED FROM 2010 AERIAL IMAGE PROVIDED BY MACON COUNTY MAPPING DEPARTMENT.
COMPOUNDS LISTED EXCEED THEIR RESPECTIVE NORTH CAROLINA GROUNDWATER QUALITY STANDARDS (2L STANDARDS)
BENZENE 45.7 ȝJO
MTBE 115.0ȝJO
BENZENE 19.0 ȝJO
NAPHTHALENE 76.7 ȝJO
N-PROPYLBENZENE 70.3 ȝJO
BENZENE 16.0 ȝJO
NAPHTHALENE 16.0 ȝJO
MW-4
NAPHTHALENE 17.5 ȝJO
GRASS AREA
GRASS AREA
GRASS AREA
GRASS AREA
MW-1
MW-2
MW-3
MW-6
MW-5
MW-4
8000 GAL. UST
6000 GAL. UST
STORE
WEST PALM
E
R

S
T
R
E
E
T
MAPLE STREETMW-1A
SCALE:
DRAWN BY:
DATE:
PROJECT NO:
FIGURE NO.
WWW.SMEINC.COM
ENGINEERING LICENSE NO: F-0176
6PALMER STREET TEXACO
196 W. PALMER ST., FRANKLIN, NC
INCIDENT NO. 5550
ELEVATIONS MAP
GROUNDWATERAS SHOWN
AUG. 2014
JDO
4305-14-152
APPROXIMATE MONITORING WELL LOCATION
PREVIOUS MONITORING WELL LOCATION (NO LONGER ONSITE)
LEGEND
SITE FEATURES TRACED FROM 2010 AERIAL IMAGE PROVIDED BY MACON COUNTY MAPPING DEPARTMENT.
(96.06)
(96.49)
(95.31)
(95.47)
(95.57)GROUNDWATER ELEVATION (FEET,RELATIVE) ON 8-16-12
WWW.SMEINC.COMCHECKED BY:PROJECT NO.DATE:FIGURE NO.SCALE:DRAWN BY:ENGINEERING LICENSE NO:F-01764MAPWELL LOCATION196 W. PALMER ST., FRANKLIN, NCINCIDENT NO. 5550PALMER STREET TEXACOAUG. 2014AS SHOWN4305-14-152JDODRL1
500' RADIUS
1000' RADIUS
1500' RADIUS
1234
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13 14 15
16
1718
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28 29 30 31
32
LEGEND
WATER SUPPLY WELL LOCATION
MAP I.D. (SEE TABLE 3)
DRAINAGE FEATURE
WEST PALMER

S
T
R
E
E
T
MAPLE STREET33
GRASS AREA
GRASS AREA
GRASS AREA
GRASS AREA
MW-1
MW-2
MW-3
MW-6
MW-5
MW-4
8000 GAL. UST
6000 GAL. UST
STORE
WEST PALM
E
R

S
T
R
E
E
T
MAPLE STREETMW-1A
SCALE:
DRAWN BY:
DATE:
PROJECT NO:
FIGURE NO.
WWW.SMEINC.COM
ENGINEERING LICENSE NO: F-0176
5PALMER STREET TEXACO
196 W. PALMER ST., FRANKLIN, NC
INCIDENT NO. 5550
MAP
GROUNDWATER QUALITYAS SHOWN
AUG. 2014
JDO
4305-14-152
APPROXIMATE MONITORING WELL LOCATION
PREVIOUS MONITORING WELL LOCATION
LEGEND
SITE FEATURES TRACED FROM 2010 AERIAL IMAGE PROVIDED BY MACON COUNTY MAPPING DEPARTMENT.
COMPOUNDS LISTED EXCEED THEIR RESPECTIVE NORTH CAROLINA GROUNDWATER QUALITY STANDARDS (2L STANDARDS)
BENZENE 45.7 ȝJO
MTBE 115.0ȝJO
BENZENE 19.0 ȝJO
NAPHTHALENE 76.7 ȝJO
N-PROPYLBENZENE 70.3 ȝJO
BENZENE 16.0 ȝJO
NAPHTHALENE 16.0 ȝJO
MW-4
NAPHTHALENE 17.5 ȝJO

TABLES
Well ID
Date
Installed
(m/dd/yy)
Date
Water
Level
Measured
(m/dd/yy)
Depth to
Water
(ft below TOC)
Groundwater
Elevation
(ft above datum.)
TOC Elevation
(ft above datum.)
Well
Casing
Diameter
(in)
Well
Casing
Depth
(ft bls)
Screen
Interval
(x to y ft. bls)
Depth
of Well
(ft bls)
MW-1A 8/15/2012 6/26/2014 3.94 96.06 100.00 2 2.00 2.00 - 12.00 12.00
MW-2 1990 6/26/2014 3.61 96.49 100.10 2 2.70 2.70 - 12.70 12.70
MW-3 1990 6/26/2014 4.28 95.31 99.59 2 2.13 2.13 - 12.13 12.13
MW-4 1990 6/26/2014 3.93 95.47 99.40 2 2.40 2.40 - 12.40 12.40
Notes:
TOC = Top of Casing
ft = feet
bls = below land surface
Elevations provided based on a 100' datum measured on top of well casing at monitor well MW-1A
Franklin, Macon County, North Carolina
NCDENR Incident No. 5550
Table 1
Monitoring Well Construction and Liquid Level Data
Palmer Street Texaco
196 W. Palmer Street
S&ME Project No. 4305-14-152
MAP ID PROPERTY ADDRESS PROPERTY OWNER NAME OWNER ADDRESS CITY, STATE, & ZIP OCCUPANT/ USE MACON COUNTY PIN SUPPLY WELL
1 196 W PALMER ST PETERSON, SHAWN SLOAN 101 LOGG N ROAD FRANKLIN NC 28734 COMMERCIAL 6584993072 NO
2 W MAIN ST TOWN OF FRANKLIN GEN DEL FRANKLIN NC 28734 COMMERCIAL 6584899246 NO
3 244 W PALMER ST HANNAH, RICKY RAY 659 BROOKWOOD DR FRANKLIN NC 28734 COMMERCIAL 6584981912 NO
4 276 W PALMER ST TASTINGER, THOMAS J JR 198 STONE CREEK DRIVE FRANKLIN NC 28734 COMMERCIAL 6584889997 NO
5 278 W PALMER ST TASTINGER, THOMAS J JR 198 STONE CREEK DRIVE FRANKLIN NC 28734 COMMERCIAL 6584980857 NO
6 145 W DOGWOOD DR SANDERS, ANNA MARIE 5210 NW 110TH AVENUE CORAL SPRINGS FL 33076 RESIDENTIAL 6584887710 YES / 900ft SW
7 MAPLE ST ANGEL, FURMAN JR 129 GOLF VIEW DR FRANKLIN NC 28734 RESIDENTIAL 6584982760 NO
8 115 MAPLE ST REECE, FRANK W MRS 30 EVERGREEN LN BRYSON CITY NC 28713 RESIDENTIAL 6584982563 NO
9 152 W PALMER ST WALIANY, GULZAR 725 BAIRD COVE ROAD FRANKLIN NC 28734 COMMERCIAL 6584986829 NO
10 10 W PALMER ST PALMER STREET MALL LLC 81 WEST MAIN STREET FRANKLIN NC 28734 COMMERCIAL 6594080879 NO
11 106 W PALMER ST GILLESPIE, KARL E.860 CORBIN RD FRANKLIN NC 28734 COMMERCIAL 6584999110 NO
12 120 W PALMER ST GILLESPIE, KARL E.860 CORBIN RD FRANKLIN NC 28734 COMMERCIAL 6584997089 NO
13 149 W PALMER ST J H DUNCAN OIL INC P O BOX 616 FRANKLIN NC 28744 COMMERCIAL 6584995284 NO
14 109 W PALMER ST EMW PROPERTIES LLC P.O. BOX 80 ASHEVILLE NC 28802 COMMERCIAL 6584997299 NO
15 W PALMER ST EMW PROPERTIES LLC P.O. BOX 80 ASHEVILLE NC 28802 COMMERCIAL 6584997227 NO
16 W PALMER STREET EMW PROPERTIES LLC P.O. BOX 80 ASHEVILLE NC 28802 RESIDENTIAL 6584996266 NO
17 330 W MAIN ST KIDS INTERDISCIPLINARY SERVICES INC 9 WEST MAIN ST FRANKLIN NC 28734 COMMERCIAL 6584996481 NO
18 344 W MAIN ST SHULER, DEBORAH LYNN 224 CA MEADOWS RD FRANKLIN NC 28734 COMMERCIAL 6584995398 NO
19 181 W PALMER ST CONLEY MOTOR COMPANY 275 STONECREEK DRIVE FRANKLIN NC 28734 COMMERCIAL 6584994223 NO
20 368 W MAIN ST PENLAND, MELVIN R 372 WEST MAIN ST FRANKLIN NC 28734 COMMERCIAL 6584994337 NO
21 24 COMMERCE ST TALLEY, HERMAN L 211 WEST PALMER ST FRANKLIN NC 28734 COMMERCIAL 6584993215 NO
22 233 W PALMER ST NORTON, KAREN H 290 OAK HILL DR FRANKLIN NC 28734 COMMERCIAL 6584991186 NO
23 21 COMMERCE ST HAVEN, RONALD M.750 MILL CREEK RD FRANKLIN NC 28734 COMMERCIAL 6584992226 NO
24 15 COMMERCE ST HAVEN, RONALD M.750 MILL CREEK RD FRANKLIN NC 28734 COMMERCIAL 6584992333 NO
25 23 COMMERCE ST KESWICK, JOHN P TRUSTEE 625 ANDERSON CREEK RD FRANKLIN NC 28734 COMMERCIAL 6584991267 NO
26 424 W MAIN ST GOODMAN, CHLOE A.150 DEER CROSSING RD FRANKLIN NC 28734 COMMERCIAL 6584991373 NO
27 49 MAPLE ST TOWN OF FRANKLIN 70 W MAIN STREET FRANKLIN NC 28734 COMMERCIAL 6584982896 NO
28 443 W MAIN ST SILER, ROBERT & THERESA G 443 W MAIN ST FRANKLIN NC 28734 COMMERCIAL 6584899693 NO
29 407 W MAIN ST DAVIS, DOERR WENDELL 407 W MAIN FRANKLIN NC 28734 COMMERCIAL 6584991593 NO
30 391 W MAIN ST COLONIAL HOUSE OF FRANKLIN LLC 1281 GEORGIA RD FRANKLIN NC 28734 COMMERCIAL 6584992586 NO
31 373 W MAIN ST HOUSTON, MAX CARL 93 TALLENT STREET FRANKLIN NC 28734 COMMERCIAL 6584994507 NO
32 355 W MAIN ST SMART, LOU P 507 N MAIN ST WAKE FOREST NC 27587 COMMERCIAL 6584994569 NO
33 102 WEST BLVD HOLLAND, RAYMOND D.102 WEST BLVD FRANKLIN NC 28734 RESIDENTIAL 6585806340 YES / 1460ft NW
S&ME Project No. 4305-14-152
Table 2
Adjacent Property Owner and Receptor Information
Palmer Street Texaco
196 W. Palmer Street
Franklin, Macon County, North Carolina
NCDENR Incident No. 5550
Metals by
Method
6010C
8/16/2012 47 12 6.8 1.6 J 3.3 <2.0 3.5 76 <2.0 <2.0 39 0.71 J 7.3 140 130 23 <2.0 56 13 109 1,710 1,780 1,080 2.8 J
6/26/2014 19.0 <1.2 3.9 <1.2 <2.5 <1.2 1.3 108 <1.2 <5.0 21.4 NA 2.3 76.7 70.3 20.2 1.4 125 24.4 168.4 NA NA NA NA
7/18/1990 15,000 NA NA NA NA NA NA 2,000 26 NA NA NA 31,000 NA NA 21,000 NA NA NA 10,000 NA NA NA NA
3/7/1991 11,000 NA NA NA NA NA NA 1,600 <50 NA NA NA 25,000 NA NA 16,000 NA NA NA 7,000 NA NA NA NA
4/29/2008 480 <10 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 490 <5.0 <20 13 <5.0 770 110 40 20 <5.0 160 <5.0 250 NA NA NA NA
7/26/2011 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 0.19 J <0.50 0.18 J <0.50 0.44 J 0.47 J 0.29 J NA NA NA NA
8/16/2012 54 3.6 1.3 0.37 J <0.50 <0.50 1.7 73 <0.50 <0.50 4.1 0.13 J 14 31 12 1.7 <0.50 5.0 0.43 J 12.62 NA NA NA NA
6/26/2014 16.0 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <1.0 <0.50 3.6 19.6 <0.50 <2.0 1.7 NA 5.8 16.0 4.5 0.73 <0.50 2.1 <0.50 2.5 NA NA NA NA
7/18/1990 14,000 NA NA NA NA NA NA 1,700 49 NA NA NA 190,000 NA NA 17,000 NA NA NA 9,300 NA NA NA NA
3/7/1991 28,000 NA NA NA NA NA NA 2,200 150 NA NA NA 380,000 NA NA 29,000 NA NA NA 12,000 NA NA NA NA
4/29/2008 8,100 <100 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 1,100 <50 <200 <50 <50 7,100 410 <50 700 <50 480 100 4,280 NA NA NA NA
7/26/2011 200 9.2 2.8 <0.50 <0.50 4.9 13 63 <0.50 0.23 BJ 5.6 0.65 270 36 16 4.5 <0.50 1.9 0.57 26 NA NA NA NA
8/16/2012 240 2.2 1.2 <1.0 1.9 <1.0 9.4 56 <1.0 <1.0 5.5 <1.0 250 17 9.9 0.77 J <1.0 1.8 <1.0 2.26 NA NA NA NA
6/26/2014 45.7 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <1.0 <0.50 4.4 12.2 <0.50 <2.0 2.3 NA 115.0 <2.0 3.4 0.59 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 1.4 NA NA NA NA
7/18/1990 70 NA NA NA NA NA NA ND ND NA NA NA ND NA NA 16 NA NA NA 1.5 NA NA NA NA
3/7/19911 270 NA NA NA NA NA NA <5.0 14 NA NA NA 18,000 NA NA 8.7 NA NA NA 21 NA NA NA NA
4/29/2008 1.2 <1.0 0.57 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 4.5 <0.50 <0.50 <2.0 4.6 <0.50 17 3.7 2.7 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <1.5 NA NA NA NA
7/26/2011 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 6.5 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 4.6 <0.50 1.8 <0.50 7.2 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <1.0 NA NA NA NA
8/16/2012 <0.50 0.58 0.90 <0.50 1.8 <0.50 4.4 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 5.2 <0.50 2.0 2.4 4.2 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 0.17 J NA NA NA NA
6/26/2014 <0.50 <0.50 3.0 <0.50 <1.0 <0.50 2.1 0.53 <0.50 <2.0 8.4 NA 1.4 17.5 16.9 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <1.0 NA NA NA NA
1.0 70 70 70 3 0.4 70 600 0.02 0.4 70 25 20 6 70 600 3 400 400 500 400 700 200 15
5,000 6,900 8,500 70,000 3,000 400 70,000 84,500 50 400 25,000 11,700 20,000 6,000 30,000 260,000 3,000 28,500 25,000 85,500 NE NE NE 15,000
51 550 NE 170 NE 37 NE 97 NE 18 11 NE 1,500 12 3,200 11 30 NE 215 670 1,400 NE 4,000 25
Notes: Concentrations reported micrograms per liter (mg/L)
NA = Not analyzed
NCAC 2L Standards = NCAC 2L groundwater quality standards
2B Standard: North Carolina Surface Water Quality Standards (August 16, 2012), lower of the Freshwater Aquatic Life or Human Health Standards
NE = No standard established
MTBE = methyl-tert-butyl ether
ND = Not detected above laboratory reporting limits
J = Estimated value. Concentration is between the method detection limit and laboratory reporting limit
MW-1A
MW-3
MW-4 n-Butylbenzenesec-Butylbenzenep-IsopropyltolueneChloroformChloromethaneEthylene dibromide (1,2-Dibromoethane)MW-2
EPA Methods 602/6210D/6200B
Analytical Method
Table 3
Current and Historical Groundwater Analytical Data
Palmer Street Texaco
Toluenen-PropylbenzeneNaphthaleneC5-C8 AliphaticsHexachlorobutadiene Concentrations in bold and highlighted in yellow exceed the NCAC 2L Standards
NCAC 2L Standards
Gross Contamination Levels
Contaminant of Concern
Benzene Concentrations in bold exceed the laboratory detection limits
NCAC 2B Standards
Well ID Date
Collected
EthylbenzeneC9-C22 AromaticsLeadMTBE1,2,4-TrimethylbenzeneIsopropylbenzene1,3,5-TrimethylbenzeneTrichloroethene196 W. Palmer Street
Franklin, Macon County, North Carolina
NCDENR Incident No. 5550
S&ME Project No. 4305-14-152
Concentrations in bold and underlined exceed the NCAC 2B Standards
MADEP VPH
1,2-DichloroethaneDiisopropyl etherXylenesC9-C18 Aliphatics
MW-4 naphthalene 76.7 50 32 31 6
Notes:
mg/L = micrograms per liter
1Review of BIOSCREEN timestep output suggests that steady state occurs approximatley 3 years into the model run.
2Output from BIOSCREEN under 1st Order Decay scenario.
Table 4
Summary of BIOSCREEN Results
Palmer Street Texaco
196 W. Palmer Street
Franklin, Macon County, North Carolina
NCDENR Incident No. 5550
S&ME Project No. 4305-14-152
Time (t)
(years)
Predicted Contaminant Concentration
in Groundwater after t years2
(mg/L)
Source Area Contaminant
Source
Concentration
(mg/L)
Width of
Source Zone
(feet)
Distance from
Source to Stream
(feet)

APPENDIX I

Well Sampling Forms

APPENDIX II

Site Photographs

Palmer Street Texaco
Franklin, North Carolina
S&ME Project No. 4305-14-152
Taken by: B. Keyse Date Taken: June 26, 2014
1
1 A view of the subject property looking to the east..2 A view of Crawford Branch entering the culvert just west
of the Alternative Auto property (223 W. Palmer Street).
3 View of the subject property looking to the south.4 View of the subject property looking to the west.

APPENDIX III

Laboratory Report and Chain-of-Custody Form

#=CL#
July 02, 2014
LIMS USE: FR - DAVID LOFTIS
LIMS OBJECT ID: 92207069
92207069
Project:
Pace Project No.:
RE:
Mr. David Loftis
S&ME
44 Buck Shoals Road
Arden, NC 28704
Palmers Street Texaco
Dear Mr. Loftis:
Enclosed are the analytical results for sample(s) received by the laboratory on June 27, 2014. The
results relate only to the samples included in this report. Results reported herein conform to the
most current TNI standards and the laboratory's Quality Assurance Manual, where applicable, unless
otherwise noted in the body of the report.
Analyses were performed at the Pace Analytical Services location indicated on the sample analyte
page for analysis unless otherwise footnoted.
If you have any questions concerning this report, please feel free to contact me.
Sincerely,
Angela Baioni
[e-mail]
Project Manager
Enclosures
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Page 1 of 22
#=CP#
CERTIFICATIONS
Pace Project No.:
Project:
92207069
Palmers Street Texaco
Charlotte Certification IDs9800 Kincey Ave. Ste 100, Huntersville, NC 28078North Carolina Drinking Water Certification #: 37706
North Carolina Field Services Certification #: 5342North Carolina Wastewater Certification #: 12South Carolina Certification #: 99006001
Florida/NELAP Certification #: E87627Kentucky UST Certification #: 84
West Virginia Certification #: 357Virginia/VELAP Certification #: 460221
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Page 2 of 22
#=SA#
SAMPLE ANALYTE COUNT
Pace Project No.:
Project:
92207069
Palmers Street Texaco
Lab ID Sample ID Method
Analytes
Reported LaboratoryAnalysts
92207069001 MW-1A SM 6200B 63 PASI-CCAH
92207069002 MW-2 SM 6200B 63 PASI-CCAH
92207069003 MW-3 SM 6200B 63 PASI-CCAH
92207069004 MW-4 SM 6200B 63 PASI-CCAH
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Page 3 of 22
#=HO#
SUMMARY OF DETECTION
Pace Project No.:
Project:
92207069
Palmers Street Texaco
Parameters AnalyzedResult
Lab Sample ID
Report Limit QualifiersUnitsMethod
Client Sample ID
92207069001 MW-1A
Benzene 19.0 ug/L 07/01/14 11:061.2SM 6200B
sec-Butylbenzene 3.9 ug/L 07/01/14 11:061.2SM 6200B
Diisopropyl ether 1.3 ug/L 07/01/14 11:061.2SM 6200B
Ethylbenzene 108 ug/L 07/01/14 11:061.2SM 6200B
Isopropylbenzene (Cumene)21.4 ug/L 07/01/14 11:061.2SM 6200B
Methyl-tert-butyl ether 2.3 ug/L 07/01/14 11:061.2SM 6200B
Naphthalene 76.7 ug/L 07/01/14 11:065.0SM 6200B
n-Propylbenzene 70.3 ug/L 07/01/14 11:061.2SM 6200B
Toluene 20.2 ug/L 07/01/14 11:061.2SM 6200B
Trichloroethene 1.4 ug/L 07/01/14 11:061.2SM 6200B
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 125 ug/L 07/01/14 11:061.2SM 6200B
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 24.4 ug/L 07/01/14 11:061.2SM 6200B
m&p-Xylene 154 ug/L 07/01/14 11:062.5SM 6200B
o-Xylene 14.4 ug/L 07/01/14 11:061.2SM 6200B
92207069002 MW-2
Benzene 16.0 ug/L 07/01/14 06:590.50SM 6200B
Diisopropyl ether 3.6 ug/L 07/01/14 06:590.50SM 6200B
Ethylbenzene 19.6 ug/L 07/01/14 06:590.50SM 6200B
Isopropylbenzene (Cumene)1.7 ug/L 07/01/14 06:590.50SM 6200B
Methyl-tert-butyl ether 5.8 ug/L 07/01/14 06:590.50SM 6200B
Naphthalene 16.0 ug/L 07/01/14 06:592.0SM 6200B
n-Propylbenzene 4.5 ug/L 07/01/14 06:590.50SM 6200B
Toluene 0.73 ug/L 07/01/14 06:590.50SM 6200B
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 2.1 ug/L 07/01/14 06:590.50SM 6200B
m&p-Xylene 2.5 ug/L 07/01/14 06:591.0SM 6200B
92207069003 MW-3
Benzene 45.7 ug/L 07/01/14 07:160.50SM 6200B
sec-Butylbenzene <0.50 ug/L 07/01/14 07:160.50SM 6200B
Diisopropyl ether 4.4 ug/L 07/01/14 07:160.50SM 6200B
Ethylbenzene 12.2 ug/L 07/01/14 07:160.50SM 6200B
Isopropylbenzene (Cumene)2.3 ug/L 07/01/14 07:160.50SM 6200B
Methyl-tert-butyl ether 115 ug/L 07/01/14 07:160.50SM 6200B
Naphthalene <2.0 ug/L 07/01/14 07:162.0SM 6200B
n-Propylbenzene 3.4 ug/L 07/01/14 07:160.50SM 6200B
Toluene 0.59 ug/L 07/01/14 07:160.50SM 6200B
m&p-Xylene 1.4 ug/L 07/01/14 07:161.0SM 6200B
o-Xylene <0.50 ug/L 07/01/14 07:160.50SM 6200B
92207069004 MW-4
sec-Butylbenzene 3.0 ug/L 07/01/14 07:320.50SM 6200B
tert-Butylbenzene <0.50 ug/L 07/01/14 07:320.50SM 6200B
Diisopropyl ether 2.1 ug/L 07/01/14 07:320.50SM 6200B
Ethylbenzene 0.53 ug/L 07/01/14 07:320.50SM 6200B
Isopropylbenzene (Cumene)8.4 ug/L 07/01/14 07:320.50SM 6200B
Methyl-tert-butyl ether 1.4 ug/L 07/01/14 07:320.50SM 6200B
Naphthalene 17.5 ug/L 07/01/14 07:322.0SM 6200B
n-Propylbenzene 16.9 ug/L 07/01/14 07:320.50SM 6200B
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Page 4 of 22
#=NA#
PROJECT NARRATIVE
Pace Project No.:
Project:
92207069
Palmers Street Texaco
Method:
Client:S&ME
SM 6200B
Date:July 02, 2014
Description:6200B MSV
General Information:
4 samples were analyzed for SM 6200B. All samples were received in acceptable condition with any exceptions noted below.
Hold Time:
The samples were analyzed within the method required hold times with any exceptions noted below.
Initial Calibrations (including MS Tune as applicable):
All criteria were within method requirements with any exceptions noted below.
Continuing Calibration:
All criteria were within method requirements with any exceptions noted below.
Internal Standards:
All internal standards were within QC limits with any exceptions noted below.
Surrogates:
All surrogates were within QC limits with any exceptions noted below.
Method Blank:
All analytes were below the report limit in the method blank, where applicable, with any exceptions noted below.
Laboratory Control Spike:
All laboratory control spike compounds were within QC limits with any exceptions noted below.
Matrix Spikes:
All percent recoveries and relative percent differences (RPDs) were within acceptance criteria with any exceptions noted below.
Additional Comments:
Analyte Comments:
QC Batch: MSV/27412
D3: Sample was diluted due to the presence of high levels of non-target analytes or other matrix interference.
• MW-1A (Lab ID: 92207069001)
• 1,1-Dichloroethane
This data package has been reviewed for quality and completeness and is approved for release.
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Page 5 of 22
#=AR#
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Pace Project No.:
Project:
92207069
Palmers Street Texaco
Sample:MW-1A Lab ID:92207069001 Collected:06/26/14 11:55 Received:06/27/14 09:00 Matrix:Water
Parameters Results Units DF Prepared Analyzed CAS No.QualReport Limit
6200B MSV Analytical Method: SM 6200B
Benzene 19.0 ug/L 07/01/14 11:06 71-43-21.2 2.5
Bromobenzene <1.2 ug/L 07/01/14 11:06 108-86-11.2 2.5
Bromochloromethane <1.2 ug/L 07/01/14 11:06 74-97-51.2 2.5
Bromodichloromethane <1.2 ug/L 07/01/14 11:06 75-27-41.2 2.5
Bromoform <1.2 ug/L 07/01/14 11:06 75-25-21.2 2.5
Bromomethane <12.5 ug/L 07/01/14 11:06 74-83-912.5 2.5
n-Butylbenzene <1.2 ug/L 07/01/14 11:06 104-51-81.2 2.5
sec-Butylbenzene 3.9 ug/L 07/01/14 11:06 135-98-81.2 2.5
tert-Butylbenzene <1.2 ug/L 07/01/14 11:06 98-06-61.2 2.5
Carbon tetrachloride <1.2 ug/L 07/01/14 11:06 56-23-51.2 2.5
Chlorobenzene <1.2 ug/L 07/01/14 11:06 108-90-71.2 2.5
Chloroethane <2.5 ug/L 07/01/14 11:06 75-00-32.5 2.5
Chloroform <1.2 ug/L 07/01/14 11:06 67-66-31.2 2.5
Chloromethane <2.5 ug/L 07/01/14 11:06 74-87-32.5 2.5
2-Chlorotoluene <1.2 ug/L 07/01/14 11:06 95-49-81.2 2.5
4-Chlorotoluene <1.2 ug/L 07/01/14 11:06 106-43-41.2 2.5
1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane <2.5 ug/L 07/01/14 11:06 96-12-82.5 2.5
Dibromochloromethane <1.2 ug/L 07/01/14 11:06 124-48-11.2 2.5
1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)<1.2 ug/L 07/01/14 11:06 106-93-41.2 2.5
Dibromomethane <1.2 ug/L 07/01/14 11:06 74-95-31.2 2.5
1,2-Dichlorobenzene <1.2 ug/L 07/01/14 11:06 95-50-11.2 2.5
1,3-Dichlorobenzene <1.2 ug/L 07/01/14 11:06 541-73-11.2 2.5
1,4-Dichlorobenzene <1.2 ug/L 07/01/14 11:06 106-46-71.2 2.5
Dichlorodifluoromethane <1.2 ug/L 07/01/14 11:06 75-71-81.2 2.5
1,1-Dichloroethane <1.2 ug/L 07/01/14 11:06 75-34-3 D31.2 2.5
1,2-Dichloroethane <1.2 ug/L 07/01/14 11:06 107-06-21.2 2.5
1,1-Dichloroethene <1.2 ug/L 07/01/14 11:06 75-35-41.2 2.5
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene <1.2 ug/L 07/01/14 11:06 156-59-21.2 2.5
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene <1.2 ug/L 07/01/14 11:06 156-60-51.2 2.5
1,2-Dichloropropane <1.2 ug/L 07/01/14 11:06 78-87-51.2 2.5
1,3-Dichloropropane <1.2 ug/L 07/01/14 11:06 142-28-91.2 2.5
2,2-Dichloropropane <1.2 ug/L 07/01/14 11:06 594-20-71.2 2.5
1,1-Dichloropropene <1.2 ug/L 07/01/14 11:06 563-58-61.2 2.5
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene <1.2 ug/L 07/01/14 11:06 10061-01-51.2 2.5
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene <1.2 ug/L 07/01/14 11:06 10061-02-61.2 2.5
Diisopropyl ether 1.3 ug/L 07/01/14 11:06 108-20-31.2 2.5
Ethylbenzene 108 ug/L 07/01/14 11:06 100-41-41.2 2.5
Hexachloro-1,3-butadiene <5.0 ug/L 07/01/14 11:06 87-68-35.0 2.5
Isopropylbenzene (Cumene)21.4 ug/L 07/01/14 11:06 98-82-81.2 2.5
Methylene Chloride <5.0 ug/L 07/01/14 11:06 75-09-25.0 2.5
Methyl-tert-butyl ether 2.3 ug/L 07/01/14 11:06 1634-04-41.2 2.5
Naphthalene 76.7 ug/L 07/01/14 11:06 91-20-35.0 2.5
n-Propylbenzene 70.3 ug/L 07/01/14 11:06 103-65-11.2 2.5
Styrene <1.2 ug/L 07/01/14 11:06 100-42-51.2 2.5
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane <1.2 ug/L 07/01/14 11:06 630-20-61.2 2.5
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane <1.2 ug/L 07/01/14 11:06 79-34-51.2 2.5
Tetrachloroethene <1.2 ug/L 07/01/14 11:06 127-18-41.2 2.5
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..Date: 07/02/2014 01:44 PM
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Page 6 of 22
#=AR#
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Pace Project No.:
Project:
92207069
Palmers Street Texaco
Sample:MW-1A Lab ID:92207069001 Collected:06/26/14 11:55 Received:06/27/14 09:00 Matrix:Water
Parameters Results Units DF Prepared Analyzed CAS No.QualReport Limit
6200B MSV Analytical Method: SM 6200B
Toluene 20.2 ug/L 07/01/14 11:06 108-88-31.2 2.5
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene <5.0 ug/L 07/01/14 11:06 87-61-65.0 2.5
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene <5.0 ug/L 07/01/14 11:06 120-82-15.0 2.5
1,1,1-Trichloroethane <1.2 ug/L 07/01/14 11:06 71-55-61.2 2.5
1,1,2-Trichloroethane <1.2 ug/L 07/01/14 11:06 79-00-51.2 2.5
Trichloroethene 1.4 ug/L 07/01/14 11:06 79-01-61.2 2.5
Trichlorofluoromethane <2.5 ug/L 07/01/14 11:06 75-69-42.5 2.5
1,2,3-Trichloropropane <1.2 ug/L 07/01/14 11:06 96-18-41.2 2.5
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 125 ug/L 07/01/14 11:06 95-63-61.2 2.5
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 24.4 ug/L 07/01/14 11:06 108-67-81.2 2.5
Vinyl chloride <2.5 ug/L 07/01/14 11:06 75-01-42.5 2.5
m&p-Xylene 154 ug/L 07/01/14 11:06 179601-23-12.5 2.5
o-Xylene 14.4 ug/L 07/01/14 11:06 95-47-61.2 2.5
Surrogates
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (S)104 %07/01/14 11:06 17060-07-070-130 2.5
4-Bromofluorobenzene (S)96 %07/01/14 11:06 460-00-470-130 2.5
Toluene-d8 (S)99 %07/01/14 11:06 2037-26-570-130 2.5
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..Date: 07/02/2014 01:44 PM
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Page 7 of 22
#=AR#
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Pace Project No.:
Project:
92207069
Palmers Street Texaco
Sample:MW-2 Lab ID:92207069002 Collected:06/26/14 14:15 Received:06/27/14 09:00 Matrix:Water
Parameters Results Units DF Prepared Analyzed CAS No.QualReport Limit
6200B MSV Analytical Method: SM 6200B
Benzene 16.0 ug/L 07/01/14 06:59 71-43-20.50 1
Bromobenzene <0.50 ug/L 07/01/14 06:59 108-86-10.50 1
Bromochloromethane <0.50 ug/L 07/01/14 06:59 74-97-50.50 1
Bromodichloromethane <0.50 ug/L 07/01/14 06:59 75-27-40.50 1
Bromoform <0.50 ug/L 07/01/14 06:59 75-25-20.50 1
Bromomethane <5.0 ug/L 07/01/14 06:59 74-83-95.0 1
n-Butylbenzene <0.50 ug/L 07/01/14 06:59 104-51-80.50 1
sec-Butylbenzene <0.50 ug/L 07/01/14 06:59 135-98-80.50 1
tert-Butylbenzene <0.50 ug/L 07/01/14 06:59 98-06-60.50 1
Carbon tetrachloride <0.50 ug/L 07/01/14 06:59 56-23-50.50 1
Chlorobenzene <0.50 ug/L 07/01/14 06:59 108-90-70.50 1
Chloroethane <1.0 ug/L 07/01/14 06:59 75-00-31.0 1
Chloroform <0.50 ug/L 07/01/14 06:59 67-66-30.50 1
Chloromethane <1.0 ug/L 07/01/14 06:59 74-87-31.0 1
2-Chlorotoluene <0.50 ug/L 07/01/14 06:59 95-49-80.50 1
4-Chlorotoluene <0.50 ug/L 07/01/14 06:59 106-43-40.50 1
1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane <1.0 ug/L 07/01/14 06:59 96-12-81.0 1
Dibromochloromethane <0.50 ug/L 07/01/14 06:59 124-48-10.50 1
1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)<0.50 ug/L 07/01/14 06:59 106-93-40.50 1
Dibromomethane <0.50 ug/L 07/01/14 06:59 74-95-30.50 1
1,2-Dichlorobenzene <0.50 ug/L 07/01/14 06:59 95-50-10.50 1
1,3-Dichlorobenzene <0.50 ug/L 07/01/14 06:59 541-73-10.50 1
1,4-Dichlorobenzene <0.50 ug/L 07/01/14 06:59 106-46-70.50 1
Dichlorodifluoromethane <0.50 ug/L 07/01/14 06:59 75-71-80.50 1
1,1-Dichloroethane <0.50 ug/L 07/01/14 06:59 75-34-30.50 1
1,2-Dichloroethane <0.50 ug/L 07/01/14 06:59 107-06-20.50 1
1,1-Dichloroethene <0.50 ug/L 07/01/14 06:59 75-35-40.50 1
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene <0.50 ug/L 07/01/14 06:59 156-59-20.50 1
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene <0.50 ug/L 07/01/14 06:59 156-60-50.50 1
1,2-Dichloropropane <0.50 ug/L 07/01/14 06:59 78-87-50.50 1
1,3-Dichloropropane <0.50 ug/L 07/01/14 06:59 142-28-90.50 1
2,2-Dichloropropane <0.50 ug/L 07/01/14 06:59 594-20-70.50 1
1,1-Dichloropropene <0.50 ug/L 07/01/14 06:59 563-58-60.50 1
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene <0.50 ug/L 07/01/14 06:59 10061-01-50.50 1
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene <0.50 ug/L 07/01/14 06:59 10061-02-60.50 1
Diisopropyl ether 3.6 ug/L 07/01/14 06:59 108-20-30.50 1
Ethylbenzene 19.6 ug/L 07/01/14 06:59 100-41-40.50 1
Hexachloro-1,3-butadiene <2.0 ug/L 07/01/14 06:59 87-68-32.0 1
Isopropylbenzene (Cumene)1.7 ug/L 07/01/14 06:59 98-82-80.50 1
Methylene Chloride <2.0 ug/L 07/01/14 06:59 75-09-22.0 1
Methyl-tert-butyl ether 5.8 ug/L 07/01/14 06:59 1634-04-40.50 1
Naphthalene 16.0 ug/L 07/01/14 06:59 91-20-32.0 1
n-Propylbenzene 4.5 ug/L 07/01/14 06:59 103-65-10.50 1
Styrene <0.50 ug/L 07/01/14 06:59 100-42-50.50 1
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane <0.50 ug/L 07/01/14 06:59 630-20-60.50 1
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane <0.50 ug/L 07/01/14 06:59 79-34-50.50 1
Tetrachloroethene <0.50 ug/L 07/01/14 06:59 127-18-40.50 1
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..Date: 07/02/2014 01:44 PM
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Page 8 of 22
#=AR#
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Pace Project No.:
Project:
92207069
Palmers Street Texaco
Sample:MW-2 Lab ID:92207069002 Collected:06/26/14 14:15 Received:06/27/14 09:00 Matrix:Water
Parameters Results Units DF Prepared Analyzed CAS No.QualReport Limit
6200B MSV Analytical Method: SM 6200B
Toluene 0.73 ug/L 07/01/14 06:59 108-88-30.50 1
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene <2.0 ug/L 07/01/14 06:59 87-61-62.0 1
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene <2.0 ug/L 07/01/14 06:59 120-82-12.0 1
1,1,1-Trichloroethane <0.50 ug/L 07/01/14 06:59 71-55-60.50 1
1,1,2-Trichloroethane <0.50 ug/L 07/01/14 06:59 79-00-50.50 1
Trichloroethene <0.50 ug/L 07/01/14 06:59 79-01-60.50 1
Trichlorofluoromethane <1.0 ug/L 07/01/14 06:59 75-69-41.0 1
1,2,3-Trichloropropane <0.50 ug/L 07/01/14 06:59 96-18-40.50 1
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 2.1 ug/L 07/01/14 06:59 95-63-60.50 1
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene <0.50 ug/L 07/01/14 06:59 108-67-80.50 1
Vinyl chloride <1.0 ug/L 07/01/14 06:59 75-01-41.0 1
m&p-Xylene 2.5 ug/L 07/01/14 06:59 179601-23-11.0 1
o-Xylene <0.50 ug/L 07/01/14 06:59 95-47-60.50 1
Surrogates
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (S)101 %07/01/14 06:59 17060-07-070-130 1
4-Bromofluorobenzene (S)96 %07/01/14 06:59 460-00-470-130 1
Toluene-d8 (S)98 %07/01/14 06:59 2037-26-570-130 1
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..Date: 07/02/2014 01:44 PM
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Page 9 of 22
#=AR#
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Pace Project No.:
Project:
92207069
Palmers Street Texaco
Sample:MW-3 Lab ID:92207069003 Collected:06/26/14 12:25 Received:06/27/14 09:00 Matrix:Water
Parameters Results Units DF Prepared Analyzed CAS No.QualReport Limit
6200B MSV Analytical Method: SM 6200B
Benzene 45.7 ug/L 07/01/14 07:16 71-43-20.50 1
Bromobenzene <0.50 ug/L 07/01/14 07:16 108-86-10.50 1
Bromochloromethane <0.50 ug/L 07/01/14 07:16 74-97-50.50 1
Bromodichloromethane <0.50 ug/L 07/01/14 07:16 75-27-40.50 1
Bromoform <0.50 ug/L 07/01/14 07:16 75-25-20.50 1
Bromomethane <5.0 ug/L 07/01/14 07:16 74-83-95.0 1
n-Butylbenzene <0.50 ug/L 07/01/14 07:16 104-51-80.50 1
sec-Butylbenzene <0.50 ug/L 07/01/14 07:16 135-98-80.50 1
tert-Butylbenzene <0.50 ug/L 07/01/14 07:16 98-06-60.50 1
Carbon tetrachloride <0.50 ug/L 07/01/14 07:16 56-23-50.50 1
Chlorobenzene <0.50 ug/L 07/01/14 07:16 108-90-70.50 1
Chloroethane <1.0 ug/L 07/01/14 07:16 75-00-31.0 1
Chloroform <0.50 ug/L 07/01/14 07:16 67-66-30.50 1
Chloromethane <1.0 ug/L 07/01/14 07:16 74-87-31.0 1
2-Chlorotoluene <0.50 ug/L 07/01/14 07:16 95-49-80.50 1
4-Chlorotoluene <0.50 ug/L 07/01/14 07:16 106-43-40.50 1
1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane <1.0 ug/L 07/01/14 07:16 96-12-81.0 1
Dibromochloromethane <0.50 ug/L 07/01/14 07:16 124-48-10.50 1
1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)<0.50 ug/L 07/01/14 07:16 106-93-40.50 1
Dibromomethane <0.50 ug/L 07/01/14 07:16 74-95-30.50 1
1,2-Dichlorobenzene <0.50 ug/L 07/01/14 07:16 95-50-10.50 1
1,3-Dichlorobenzene <0.50 ug/L 07/01/14 07:16 541-73-10.50 1
1,4-Dichlorobenzene <0.50 ug/L 07/01/14 07:16 106-46-70.50 1
Dichlorodifluoromethane <0.50 ug/L 07/01/14 07:16 75-71-80.50 1
1,1-Dichloroethane <0.50 ug/L 07/01/14 07:16 75-34-30.50 1
1,2-Dichloroethane <0.50 ug/L 07/01/14 07:16 107-06-20.50 1
1,1-Dichloroethene <0.50 ug/L 07/01/14 07:16 75-35-40.50 1
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene <0.50 ug/L 07/01/14 07:16 156-59-20.50 1
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene <0.50 ug/L 07/01/14 07:16 156-60-50.50 1
1,2-Dichloropropane <0.50 ug/L 07/01/14 07:16 78-87-50.50 1
1,3-Dichloropropane <0.50 ug/L 07/01/14 07:16 142-28-90.50 1
2,2-Dichloropropane <0.50 ug/L 07/01/14 07:16 594-20-70.50 1
1,1-Dichloropropene <0.50 ug/L 07/01/14 07:16 563-58-60.50 1
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene <0.50 ug/L 07/01/14 07:16 10061-01-50.50 1
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene <0.50 ug/L 07/01/14 07:16 10061-02-60.50 1
Diisopropyl ether 4.4 ug/L 07/01/14 07:16 108-20-30.50 1
Ethylbenzene 12.2 ug/L 07/01/14 07:16 100-41-40.50 1
Hexachloro-1,3-butadiene <2.0 ug/L 07/01/14 07:16 87-68-32.0 1
Isopropylbenzene (Cumene)2.3 ug/L 07/01/14 07:16 98-82-80.50 1
Methylene Chloride <2.0 ug/L 07/01/14 07:16 75-09-22.0 1
Methyl-tert-butyl ether 115 ug/L 07/01/14 07:16 1634-04-40.50 1
Naphthalene <2.0 ug/L 07/01/14 07:16 91-20-32.0 1
n-Propylbenzene 3.4 ug/L 07/01/14 07:16 103-65-10.50 1
Styrene <0.50 ug/L 07/01/14 07:16 100-42-50.50 1
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane <0.50 ug/L 07/01/14 07:16 630-20-60.50 1
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane <0.50 ug/L 07/01/14 07:16 79-34-50.50 1
Tetrachloroethene <0.50 ug/L 07/01/14 07:16 127-18-40.50 1
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..Date: 07/02/2014 01:44 PM
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Page 10 of 22
#=AR#
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Pace Project No.:
Project:
92207069
Palmers Street Texaco
Sample:MW-3 Lab ID:92207069003 Collected:06/26/14 12:25 Received:06/27/14 09:00 Matrix:Water
Parameters Results Units DF Prepared Analyzed CAS No.QualReport Limit
6200B MSV Analytical Method: SM 6200B
Toluene 0.59 ug/L 07/01/14 07:16 108-88-30.50 1
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene <2.0 ug/L 07/01/14 07:16 87-61-62.0 1
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene <2.0 ug/L 07/01/14 07:16 120-82-12.0 1
1,1,1-Trichloroethane <0.50 ug/L 07/01/14 07:16 71-55-60.50 1
1,1,2-Trichloroethane <0.50 ug/L 07/01/14 07:16 79-00-50.50 1
Trichloroethene <0.50 ug/L 07/01/14 07:16 79-01-60.50 1
Trichlorofluoromethane <1.0 ug/L 07/01/14 07:16 75-69-41.0 1
1,2,3-Trichloropropane <0.50 ug/L 07/01/14 07:16 96-18-40.50 1
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene <0.50 ug/L 07/01/14 07:16 95-63-60.50 1
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene <0.50 ug/L 07/01/14 07:16 108-67-80.50 1
Vinyl chloride <1.0 ug/L 07/01/14 07:16 75-01-41.0 1
m&p-Xylene 1.4 ug/L 07/01/14 07:16 179601-23-11.0 1
o-Xylene <0.50 ug/L 07/01/14 07:16 95-47-60.50 1
Surrogates
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (S)102 %07/01/14 07:16 17060-07-070-130 1
4-Bromofluorobenzene (S)95 %07/01/14 07:16 460-00-470-130 1
Toluene-d8 (S)99 %07/01/14 07:16 2037-26-570-130 1
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..Date: 07/02/2014 01:44 PM
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Page 11 of 22
#=AR#
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Pace Project No.:
Project:
92207069
Palmers Street Texaco
Sample:MW-4 Lab ID:92207069004 Collected:06/26/14 14:30 Received:06/27/14 09:00 Matrix:Water
Parameters Results Units DF Prepared Analyzed CAS No.QualReport Limit
6200B MSV Analytical Method: SM 6200B
Benzene <0.50 ug/L 07/01/14 07:32 71-43-20.50 1
Bromobenzene <0.50 ug/L 07/01/14 07:32 108-86-10.50 1
Bromochloromethane <0.50 ug/L 07/01/14 07:32 74-97-50.50 1
Bromodichloromethane <0.50 ug/L 07/01/14 07:32 75-27-40.50 1
Bromoform <0.50 ug/L 07/01/14 07:32 75-25-20.50 1
Bromomethane <5.0 ug/L 07/01/14 07:32 74-83-95.0 1
n-Butylbenzene <0.50 ug/L 07/01/14 07:32 104-51-80.50 1
sec-Butylbenzene 3.0 ug/L 07/01/14 07:32 135-98-80.50 1
tert-Butylbenzene <0.50 ug/L 07/01/14 07:32 98-06-60.50 1
Carbon tetrachloride <0.50 ug/L 07/01/14 07:32 56-23-50.50 1
Chlorobenzene <0.50 ug/L 07/01/14 07:32 108-90-70.50 1
Chloroethane <1.0 ug/L 07/01/14 07:32 75-00-31.0 1
Chloroform <0.50 ug/L 07/01/14 07:32 67-66-30.50 1
Chloromethane <1.0 ug/L 07/01/14 07:32 74-87-31.0 1
2-Chlorotoluene <0.50 ug/L 07/01/14 07:32 95-49-80.50 1
4-Chlorotoluene <0.50 ug/L 07/01/14 07:32 106-43-40.50 1
1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane <1.0 ug/L 07/01/14 07:32 96-12-81.0 1
Dibromochloromethane <0.50 ug/L 07/01/14 07:32 124-48-10.50 1
1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)<0.50 ug/L 07/01/14 07:32 106-93-40.50 1
Dibromomethane <0.50 ug/L 07/01/14 07:32 74-95-30.50 1
1,2-Dichlorobenzene <0.50 ug/L 07/01/14 07:32 95-50-10.50 1
1,3-Dichlorobenzene <0.50 ug/L 07/01/14 07:32 541-73-10.50 1
1,4-Dichlorobenzene <0.50 ug/L 07/01/14 07:32 106-46-70.50 1
Dichlorodifluoromethane <0.50 ug/L 07/01/14 07:32 75-71-80.50 1
1,1-Dichloroethane <0.50 ug/L 07/01/14 07:32 75-34-30.50 1
1,2-Dichloroethane <0.50 ug/L 07/01/14 07:32 107-06-20.50 1
1,1-Dichloroethene <0.50 ug/L 07/01/14 07:32 75-35-40.50 1
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene <0.50 ug/L 07/01/14 07:32 156-59-20.50 1
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene <0.50 ug/L 07/01/14 07:32 156-60-50.50 1
1,2-Dichloropropane <0.50 ug/L 07/01/14 07:32 78-87-50.50 1
1,3-Dichloropropane <0.50 ug/L 07/01/14 07:32 142-28-90.50 1
2,2-Dichloropropane <0.50 ug/L 07/01/14 07:32 594-20-70.50 1
1,1-Dichloropropene <0.50 ug/L 07/01/14 07:32 563-58-60.50 1
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene <0.50 ug/L 07/01/14 07:32 10061-01-50.50 1
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene <0.50 ug/L 07/01/14 07:32 10061-02-60.50 1
Diisopropyl ether 2.1 ug/L 07/01/14 07:32 108-20-30.50 1
Ethylbenzene 0.53 ug/L 07/01/14 07:32 100-41-40.50 1
Hexachloro-1,3-butadiene <2.0 ug/L 07/01/14 07:32 87-68-32.0 1
Isopropylbenzene (Cumene)8.4 ug/L 07/01/14 07:32 98-82-80.50 1
Methylene Chloride <2.0 ug/L 07/01/14 07:32 75-09-22.0 1
Methyl-tert-butyl ether 1.4 ug/L 07/01/14 07:32 1634-04-40.50 1
Naphthalene 17.5 ug/L 07/01/14 07:32 91-20-32.0 1
n-Propylbenzene 16.9 ug/L 07/01/14 07:32 103-65-10.50 1
Styrene <0.50 ug/L 07/01/14 07:32 100-42-50.50 1
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane <0.50 ug/L 07/01/14 07:32 630-20-60.50 1
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane <0.50 ug/L 07/01/14 07:32 79-34-50.50 1
Tetrachloroethene <0.50 ug/L 07/01/14 07:32 127-18-40.50 1
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..Date: 07/02/2014 01:44 PM
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Page 12 of 22
#=AR#
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Pace Project No.:
Project:
92207069
Palmers Street Texaco
Sample:MW-4 Lab ID:92207069004 Collected:06/26/14 14:30 Received:06/27/14 09:00 Matrix:Water
Parameters Results Units DF Prepared Analyzed CAS No.QualReport Limit
6200B MSV Analytical Method: SM 6200B
Toluene <0.50 ug/L 07/01/14 07:32 108-88-30.50 1
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene <2.0 ug/L 07/01/14 07:32 87-61-62.0 1
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene <2.0 ug/L 07/01/14 07:32 120-82-12.0 1
1,1,1-Trichloroethane <0.50 ug/L 07/01/14 07:32 71-55-60.50 1
1,1,2-Trichloroethane <0.50 ug/L 07/01/14 07:32 79-00-50.50 1
Trichloroethene <0.50 ug/L 07/01/14 07:32 79-01-60.50 1
Trichlorofluoromethane <1.0 ug/L 07/01/14 07:32 75-69-41.0 1
1,2,3-Trichloropropane <0.50 ug/L 07/01/14 07:32 96-18-40.50 1
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene <0.50 ug/L 07/01/14 07:32 95-63-60.50 1
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene <0.50 ug/L 07/01/14 07:32 108-67-80.50 1
Vinyl chloride <1.0 ug/L 07/01/14 07:32 75-01-41.0 1
m&p-Xylene <1.0 ug/L 07/01/14 07:32 179601-23-11.0 1
o-Xylene <0.50 ug/L 07/01/14 07:32 95-47-60.50 1
Surrogates
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (S)100 %07/01/14 07:32 17060-07-070-130 1
4-Bromofluorobenzene (S)96 %07/01/14 07:32 460-00-470-130 1
Toluene-d8 (S)99 %07/01/14 07:32 2037-26-570-130 1
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..Date: 07/02/2014 01:44 PM
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Page 13 of 22
#=QC#
QUALITY CONTROL DATA
Pace Project No.:
Project:
92207069
Palmers Street Texaco
Results presented on this page are in the units indicated by the "Units" column except where an alternate unit is presented to the right of the result.
QC Batch:
QC Batch Method:
Analysis Method:
Analysis Description:
MSV/27412
SM 6200B
SM 6200B
6200B MSV
Associated Lab Samples:92207069001, 92207069002, 92207069003, 92207069004
Parameter Units
Blank
Result
Reporting
Limit Qualifiers
METHOD BLANK:1232847
Associated Lab Samples:92207069001, 92207069002, 92207069003, 92207069004
Matrix:Water
Analyzed
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane ug/L <0.50 0.50 07/01/14 02:17
1,1,1-Trichloroethane ug/L <0.50 0.50 07/01/14 02:17
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ug/L <0.50 0.50 07/01/14 02:17
1,1,2-Trichloroethane ug/L <0.50 0.50 07/01/14 02:17
1,1-Dichloroethane ug/L <0.50 0.50 07/01/14 02:17
1,1-Dichloroethene ug/L <0.50 0.50 07/01/14 02:17
1,1-Dichloropropene ug/L <0.50 0.50 07/01/14 02:17
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene ug/L <2.0 2.0 07/01/14 02:17
1,2,3-Trichloropropane ug/L <0.50 0.50 07/01/14 02:17
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene ug/L <2.0 2.0 07/01/14 02:17
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene ug/L <0.50 0.50 07/01/14 02:17
1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane ug/L <1.0 1.0 07/01/14 02:17
1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)ug/L <0.50 0.50 07/01/14 02:17
1,2-Dichlorobenzene ug/L <0.50 0.50 07/01/14 02:17
1,2-Dichloroethane ug/L <0.50 0.50 07/01/14 02:17
1,2-Dichloropropane ug/L <0.50 0.50 07/01/14 02:17
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene ug/L <0.50 0.50 07/01/14 02:17
1,3-Dichlorobenzene ug/L <0.50 0.50 07/01/14 02:17
1,3-Dichloropropane ug/L <0.50 0.50 07/01/14 02:17
1,4-Dichlorobenzene ug/L <0.50 0.50 07/01/14 02:17
2,2-Dichloropropane ug/L <0.50 0.50 07/01/14 02:17
2-Chlorotoluene ug/L <0.50 0.50 07/01/14 02:17
4-Chlorotoluene ug/L <0.50 0.50 07/01/14 02:17
Benzene ug/L <0.50 0.50 07/01/14 02:17
Bromobenzene ug/L <0.50 0.50 07/01/14 02:17
Bromochloromethane ug/L <0.50 0.50 07/01/14 02:17
Bromodichloromethane ug/L <0.50 0.50 07/01/14 02:17
Bromoform ug/L <0.50 0.50 07/01/14 02:17
Bromomethane ug/L <5.0 5.0 07/01/14 02:17
Carbon tetrachloride ug/L <0.50 0.50 07/01/14 02:17
Chlorobenzene ug/L <0.50 0.50 07/01/14 02:17
Chloroethane ug/L <1.0 1.0 07/01/14 02:17
Chloroform ug/L <0.50 0.50 07/01/14 02:17
Chloromethane ug/L <1.0 1.0 07/01/14 02:17
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene ug/L <0.50 0.50 07/01/14 02:17
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene ug/L <0.50 0.50 07/01/14 02:17
Dibromochloromethane ug/L <0.50 0.50 07/01/14 02:17
Dibromomethane ug/L <0.50 0.50 07/01/14 02:17
Dichlorodifluoromethane ug/L <0.50 0.50 07/01/14 02:17
Diisopropyl ether ug/L <0.50 0.50 07/01/14 02:17
Ethylbenzene ug/L <0.50 0.50 07/01/14 02:17
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..Date: 07/02/2014 01:44 PM
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Page 14 of 22
#=QC#
QUALITY CONTROL DATA
Pace Project No.:
Project:
92207069
Palmers Street Texaco
Results presented on this page are in the units indicated by the "Units" column except where an alternate unit is presented to the right of the result.
Parameter Units
Blank
Result
Reporting
Limit Qualifiers
METHOD BLANK:1232847
Associated Lab Samples:92207069001, 92207069002, 92207069003, 92207069004
Matrix:Water
Analyzed
Hexachloro-1,3-butadiene ug/L <2.0 2.0 07/01/14 02:17
Isopropylbenzene (Cumene)ug/L <0.50 0.50 07/01/14 02:17
m&p-Xylene ug/L <1.0 1.0 07/01/14 02:17
Methyl-tert-butyl ether ug/L <0.50 0.50 07/01/14 02:17
Methylene Chloride ug/L <2.0 2.0 07/01/14 02:17
n-Butylbenzene ug/L <0.50 0.50 07/01/14 02:17
n-Propylbenzene ug/L <0.50 0.50 07/01/14 02:17
Naphthalene ug/L <2.0 2.0 07/01/14 02:17
o-Xylene ug/L <0.50 0.50 07/01/14 02:17
sec-Butylbenzene ug/L <0.50 0.50 07/01/14 02:17
Styrene ug/L <0.50 0.50 07/01/14 02:17
tert-Butylbenzene ug/L <0.50 0.50 07/01/14 02:17
Tetrachloroethene ug/L <0.50 0.50 07/01/14 02:17
Toluene ug/L <0.50 0.50 07/01/14 02:17
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene ug/L <0.50 0.50 07/01/14 02:17
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene ug/L <0.50 0.50 07/01/14 02:17
Trichloroethene ug/L <0.50 0.50 07/01/14 02:17
Trichlorofluoromethane ug/L <1.0 1.0 07/01/14 02:17
Vinyl chloride ug/L <1.0 1.0 07/01/14 02:17
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (S)%103 70-130 07/01/14 02:17
4-Bromofluorobenzene (S)%96 70-130 07/01/14 02:17
Toluene-d8 (S)%99 70-130 07/01/14 02:17
Parameter Units
LCS
Result
% Rec
Limits Qualifiers% RecConc.
1232849LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE:
LCSSpike
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane ug/L 51.350 103 60-140
1,1,1-Trichloroethane ug/L 52.850 106 60-140
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ug/L 48.150 96 60-140
1,1,2-Trichloroethane ug/L 49.950 100 60-140
1,1-Dichloroethane ug/L 47.550 95 60-140
1,1-Dichloroethene ug/L 54.950 110 60-140
1,1-Dichloropropene ug/L 51.850 104 60-140
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene ug/L 47.350 95 60-140
1,2,3-Trichloropropane ug/L 50.950 102 60-140
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene ug/L 47.050 94 60-140
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene ug/L 50.350 101 60-140
1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane ug/L 51.050 102 60-140
1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)ug/L 50.550 101 60-140
1,2-Dichlorobenzene ug/L 49.950 100 60-140
1,2-Dichloroethane ug/L 49.950 100 60-140
1,2-Dichloropropane ug/L 49.450 99 60-140
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene ug/L 49.550 99 60-140
1,3-Dichlorobenzene ug/L 49.450 99 60-140
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..Date: 07/02/2014 01:44 PM
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Page 15 of 22
#=QC#
QUALITY CONTROL DATA
Pace Project No.:
Project:
92207069
Palmers Street Texaco
Results presented on this page are in the units indicated by the "Units" column except where an alternate unit is presented to the right of the result.
Parameter Units
LCS
Result
% Rec
Limits Qualifiers% RecConc.
1232849LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE:
LCSSpike
1,3-Dichloropropane ug/L 48.650 97 60-140
1,4-Dichlorobenzene ug/L 48.650 97 60-140
2,2-Dichloropropane ug/L 47.150 94 60-140
2-Chlorotoluene ug/L 49.550 99 60-140
4-Chlorotoluene ug/L 48.350 97 60-140
Benzene ug/L 51.250 102 60-140
Bromobenzene ug/L 48.750 97 60-140
Bromochloromethane ug/L 54.150 108 60-140
Bromodichloromethane ug/L 53.150 106 60-140
Bromoform ug/L 45.350 91 60-140
Bromomethane ug/L 49.450 99 60-140
Carbon tetrachloride ug/L 55.250 110 60-140
Chlorobenzene ug/L 50.150 100 60-140
Chloroethane ug/L 44.650 89 60-140
Chloroform ug/L 53.050 106 60-140
Chloromethane ug/L 53.350 107 60-140
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene ug/L 54.650 109 60-140
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene ug/L 52.950 106 60-140
Dibromochloromethane ug/L 55.850 112 60-140
Dibromomethane ug/L 49.950 100 60-140
Dichlorodifluoromethane ug/L 54.250 108 60-140
Diisopropyl ether ug/L 49.750 99 60-140
Ethylbenzene ug/L 48.950 98 60-140
Hexachloro-1,3-butadiene ug/L 45.750 91 60-140
Isopropylbenzene (Cumene)ug/L 51.850 104 60-140
m&p-Xylene ug/L 98.8100 99 60-140
Methyl-tert-butyl ether ug/L 49.450 99 60-140
Methylene Chloride ug/L 52.850 106 60-140
n-Butylbenzene ug/L 49.850 100 60-140
n-Propylbenzene ug/L 49.750 99 60-140
Naphthalene ug/L 49.250 98 60-140
o-Xylene ug/L 50.450 101 60-140
sec-Butylbenzene ug/L 49.650 99 60-140
Styrene ug/L 51.850 104 60-140
tert-Butylbenzene ug/L 50.450 101 60-140
Tetrachloroethene ug/L 48.750 97 60-140
Toluene ug/L 49.950 100 60-140
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene ug/L 53.450 107 60-140
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene ug/L 44.850 90 60-140
Trichloroethene ug/L 50.050 100 60-140
Trichlorofluoromethane ug/L 52.650 105 60-140
Vinyl chloride ug/L 53.450 107 60-140
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (S)%105 70-130
4-Bromofluorobenzene (S)%100 70-130
Toluene-d8 (S)%100 70-130
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..Date: 07/02/2014 01:44 PM
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Page 16 of 22
#=QC#
QUALITY CONTROL DATA
Pace Project No.:
Project:
92207069
Palmers Street Texaco
Results presented on this page are in the units indicated by the "Units" column except where an alternate unit is presented to the right of the result.
Parameter Units
MS
Result
% Rec
Limits Qual% RecConc.
1232850MATRIX SPIKE & MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE:
MSSpike
Result
92207131013
1232851
MSD
Result
MSD
% Rec RPD
MSDMS
Spike
Conc.
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane ug/L 20 102 60-140101 120ND20.5 20.3
1,1,1-Trichloroethane ug/L 20 109 60-140110 120ND21.8 22.1
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ug/L 20 96 60-14097 120ND19.2 19.5
1,1,2-Trichloroethane ug/L 20 102 60-140105 320ND20.4 21.1
1,1-Dichloroethane ug/L 20 98 60-14099 120ND19.6 19.8
1,1-Dichloroethene ug/L 20 118 60-140117 020ND23.6 23.5
1,1-Dichloropropene ug/L 20 111 60-140111 120ND22.2 22.1
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene ug/L 20 98 60-14098 020ND19.6 19.6
1,2,3-Trichloropropane ug/L 20 103 60-140104 120ND20.5 20.7
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene ug/L 20 97 60-14096 120ND19.4 19.2
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene ug/L 20 107 60-140105 220ND21.4 21.1
1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane ug/L 20 94 60-14091 420ND18.9 18.1
1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)ug/L 20 101 60-140103 220ND20.1 20.6
1,2-Dichlorobenzene ug/L 20 103 60-140103 020ND20.6 20.7
1,2-Dichloroethane ug/L 20 103 60-140104 120ND20.6 20.8
1,2-Dichloropropane ug/L 20 100 60-140100 120ND20.0 20.1
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene ug/L 20 105 60-140104 120ND21.1 20.8
1,3-Dichlorobenzene ug/L 20 102 60-140102 020ND20.4 20.4
1,3-Dichloropropane ug/L 20 98 60-14098 120ND19.5 19.7
1,4-Dichlorobenzene ug/L 20 103 60-140103 020ND20.7 20.6
2,2-Dichloropropane ug/L 20 106 60-140105 020ND21.2 21.1
2-Chlorotoluene ug/L 20 103 60-140101 220ND20.6 20.3
4-Chlorotoluene ug/L 20 101 60-140100 120ND20.1 19.9
Benzene ug/L 20 107 60-140110 320ND21.3 21.9
Bromobenzene ug/L 20 99 60-14099 120ND19.9 19.7
Bromochloromethane ug/L 20 114 60-140116 220ND22.9 23.3
Bromodichloromethane ug/L 20 104 60-140106 220ND20.8 21.2
Bromoform ug/L 20 88 60-14087 120ND17.5 17.3
Bromomethane ug/L 20 74 60-14090 1920ND14.8 18.0
Carbon tetrachloride ug/L 20 115 60-140118 220ND23.0 23.5
Chlorobenzene ug/L 20 105 60-140104 020ND20.9 20.8
Chloroethane ug/L 20 111 60-140108 320ND22.2 21.5
Chloroform ug/L 20 111 60-140110 120ND22.1 22.0
Chloromethane ug/L 20 118 60-140118 020ND23.7 23.6
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene ug/L 20 113 60-140112 120ND22.6 22.4
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene ug/L 20 100 60-140101 220ND19.9 20.3
Dibromochloromethane ug/L 20 106 60-140107 220ND21.1 21.5
Dibromomethane ug/L 20 100 60-140102 220ND20.1 20.4
Dichlorodifluoromethane ug/L 20 136 60-140138 120ND27.2 27.6
Diisopropyl ether ug/L 20 102 60-140103 120ND20.3 20.5
Ethylbenzene ug/L 20 103 60-140103 020ND20.6 20.6
Hexachloro-1,3-butadiene ug/L 20 101 60-14098 320ND20.3 19.7
Isopropylbenzene (Cumene)ug/L 20 110 60-140109 020ND22.0 21.9
m&p-Xylene ug/L 40 105 60-140105 140ND41.9 42.2
Methyl-tert-butyl ether ug/L 20 98 60-140100 220ND19.6 19.9
Methylene Chloride ug/L 20 100 60-140104 520ND19.9 20.9
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..Date: 07/02/2014 01:44 PM
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Page 17 of 22
#=QC#
QUALITY CONTROL DATA
Pace Project No.:
Project:
92207069
Palmers Street Texaco
Results presented on this page are in the units indicated by the "Units" column except where an alternate unit is presented to the right of the result.
Parameter Units
MS
Result
% Rec
Limits Qual% RecConc.
1232850MATRIX SPIKE & MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE:
MSSpike
Result
92207131013
1232851
MSD
Result
MSD
% Rec RPD
MSDMS
Spike
Conc.
n-Butylbenzene ug/L 20 108 60-140105 320ND21.6 20.9
n-Propylbenzene ug/L 20 106 60-140106 120ND21.3 21.1
Naphthalene ug/L 20 99 60-14099 020ND19.8 19.9
o-Xylene ug/L 20 104 60-140104 020ND20.7 20.7
sec-Butylbenzene ug/L 20 107 60-140105 120ND21.4 21.1
Styrene ug/L 20 107 60-140107 020ND21.5 21.4
tert-Butylbenzene ug/L 20 107 60-140106 120ND21.4 21.2
Tetrachloroethene ug/L 20 104 60-140103 120ND20.8 20.6
Toluene ug/L 20 103 60-140107 420ND20.6 21.3
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene ug/L 20 115 60-140110 420ND23.0 22.1
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene ug/L 20 88 60-14088 020ND17.5 17.6
Trichloroethene ug/L 20 106 60-140107 120ND21.1 21.4
Trichlorofluoromethane ug/L 20 125 60-140125 020ND24.9 25.0
Vinyl chloride ug/L 20 117 60-140119 120ND23.4 23.7
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (S)%104 70-130102
4-Bromofluorobenzene (S)%98 70-13099
Toluene-d8 (S)%100 70-130101
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..Date: 07/02/2014 01:44 PM
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Page 18 of 22
#=QL#
QUALIFIERS
Pace Project No.:
Project:
92207069
Palmers Street Texaco
DEFINITIONS
DF - Dilution Factor, if reported, represents the factor applied to the reported data due to changes in sample preparation, dilution of
the sample aliquot, or moisture content.
ND - Not Detected at or above adjusted reporting limit.
J - Estimated concentration above the adjusted method detection limit and below the adjusted reporting limit.
MDL - Adjusted Method Detection Limit.
PQL - Practical Quantitation Limit.
RL - Reporting Limit.
S - Surrogate
1,2-Diphenylhydrazine (8270 listed analyte) decomposes to Azobenzene.
Consistent with EPA guidelines, unrounded data are displayed and have been used to calculate % recovery and RPD values.
LCS(D) - Laboratory Control Sample (Duplicate)
MS(D) - Matrix Spike (Duplicate)
DUP - Sample Duplicate
RPD - Relative Percent Difference
NC - Not Calculable.
SG - Silica Gel - Clean-Up
U - Indicates the compound was analyzed for, but not detected.
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine decomposes and cannot be separated from Diphenylamine using Method 8270. The result reported for
each analyte is a combined concentration.
Acid preservation may not be appropriate for 2-Chloroethylvinyl ether, Styrene, and Vinyl chloride.
LOD - Limit of Detection.
LOQ - Limit of Quantitation.
Pace Analytical is TNI accredited. Contact your Pace PM for the current list of accredited analytes.
TNI - The NELAC Institute.
LABORATORIES
Pace Analytical Services - CharlottePASI-C
ANALYTE QUALIFIERS
Sample was diluted due to the presence of high levels of non-target analytes or other matrix interference.D3
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..Date: 07/02/2014 01:44 PM
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Page 19 of 22
#=CR#
QUALITY CONTROL DATA CROSS REFERENCE TABLE
Pace Project No.:
Project:
92207069
Palmers Street Texaco
Lab ID Sample ID QC Batch Method QC Batch Analytical Method
Analytical
Batch
92207069001 MSV/27412MW-1A SM 6200B
92207069002 MSV/27412MW-2 SM 6200B
92207069003 MSV/27412MW-3 SM 6200B
92207069004 MSV/27412MW-4 SM 6200B
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..Date: 07/02/2014 01:44 PM
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Page 20 of 22
Page 21 of 22
Page 22 of 22

APPENDIX IV

Slug Test Results

Calculation of Hydraulic Conductivity
Rising Head Method (Slug Test)
Site Name/Location:Palmer Street Texaco-Franklin, North Carolina
S&ME Project No.:4305-14-152
Well Label:MW-2
Test Date:6/26/2014
Screen Length:10 feet
Casing Radius:1 inches
Effective Radius:3.75 inches
Gravel Pack Porosity:30.00%
Static Water Level:3.61 feet below land surface
Water Table to Screen Bottom:9.09 feet
Aquifer Thickness:14.09 feet
Anisotropy Ratio:1
Time Adjustment:0. Seconds
Test starts with trial 0
There are 55 time and drawdown measurements
Maximum head is 1.121 feet
Minimum head is 0 feet
Calculation by Bouwer and Rice Graphical Method
HYDRAU LIC CONDU CTIVITY
8.95 x 10-05 cm/sec
Calculation of Hydraulic Conductivity
Rising Head Method (Slug Test)
Site Name/Location:Palmer Street Texaco-Franklin, North Carolina
S&ME Project No.:4305-14-152
Well Label:MW-3
Test Date:6/26/2014
Screen Length:10 feet
Casing Radius:1 inches
Effective Radius:3.75 inches
Gravel Pack Porosity:30.00%
Static Water Level:4.28 feet below land surface
Water Table to Screen Bottom:7.85 feet
Aquifer Thickness:12.85 feet
Anisotropy Ratio:1
Time Adjustment:0. Seconds
Test starts with trial 0
There are 62 time and drawdown measurements
Maximum head is 2.2 feet
Minimum head is 0 feet
Calculation by Bouwer and Rice Graphical Method
HYDRAU LIC CONDU CTIVITY
2.68 x 10-04 cm/sec

APPENDIX V

BIOSCREEN Input and Output

Hydraulic Gradient
Hydraulic Conductivity,L
hhi12
where: h2 = groundwater elevation at an upgradient point on the site (feet)
h1 = groundwater elevation at a downgradient point on the site (feet)
L = distance between the two points
05.0feet5
feet.250i feet/feet
Seepage Velocity
Seepage Velocity,
enVki
s 
where: k = hydraulic conductivity (feet/day)
i = hydraulic gradient (feet/feet)-assumed value of 0.30
en effective porosity
year
feet9.30year1
days365
day1
min1440
min1
sec60
cm30.48
feet
0.30
05.0sec
cm10x1.79
V
4







feet
feet
s
BIOSCREEN Natural Attenuation Decision Support SystemPalmer Street TexData Input Instructions:Air Force Center for Environmental ExcellenceVersion 1.4Naphthalene115 1. Enter value directly....orRun Name 2. Calculate by filling in grey 1. HYDROGEOLOGY5. GENERAL 0.02 cells below. (To restore Seepage Velocity*Vs30.9(ft/yr)Modeled Area Length*47(ft) formulas, hit button below).orModeled Area Width*50(ft)Variable* Data used directly in model. Hydraulic ConductivityK1.8E-04(cm/sec)Simulation Time* 10(yr)20 Value calculated by model.Hydraulic Gradienti0.05(ft/ft) (Don't enter any data).Porosityn0.3(-)6. SOURCE DATA Source Thickness in Sat.Zone*25(ft)2. DISPERSION Source Zones:Longitudinal Dispersivity*alpha x3.9(ft)Width* (ft)Conc. (mg/L)*Transverse Dispersivity*alpha y0.4(ft)001Vertical Dispersivity*alpha z0.0(ft)00or500.0767Estimated Plume LengthLp47(ft)00003. ADSORPTION Source Halflife (see Help):Retardation Factor*R1.0(-)>1000>1000(yr)View of Plume Looking DownorInst. React. 1st OrderSoil Bulk Densityrho1.7(kg/l)Soluble Mass2000(Kg)Observed Centerline Concentrations at Monitoring Wells Partition CoefficientKoc38(L/kg)In Source NAPL, SoilIf No Data Leave Blank or Enter "0"FractionOrganicCarbonfoc5.7E-5(-)7. FIELD DATA FOR COMPARISONConcentration (mg/L)4. BIODEGRADATION Dist. from Source (ft)05914192428333842471st Order Decay Coeff*lambda2.0E+0(per yr)or8. CHOOSE TYPE OF OUTPUT TO SEE:Solute Half-Lifet-half0.3500(year)or Instantaneous Reaction ModelDelta Oxygen*DO(mg/L)Delta Nitrate*NO3(mg/L)Observed Ferrous Iron*Fe2+(mg/L)Delta Sulfate*SO4(mg/L)Observed Methane*CH4(mg/L)Vertical Plane Source: Look at Plume Cross-Section and Input Concentrations & WidthsView OutputPaste Example DatasetView OutputRestore Formulas for Vs, RUN RUN ARRAYHelpRecalculate LWorororor12345oror
DISSOLVED HYDROCARBON CONCENTRATION ALONG PLUME CENTERLINE (mg/L at Z=0)Distance from Source (ft)TYPE OF MODEL0 5 9 14 19 24 28 33 38 42 47No Degradation0.077 0.077 0.077 0.077 0.076 0.076 0.076 0.076 0.075 0.074 0.0731st Order Decay0.077 0.060 0.046 0.036 0.028 0.022 0.017 0.013 0.010 0.008 0.006Inst. Reaction0.077 0.077 0.077 0.077 0.076 0.076 0.076 0.076 0.075 0.074 0.073Field Data from SiteTime:3 YearsNext TimestepPrev TimestepReplayRecalculate This 0.00.00.00.00.00.10.10.10.10.10 16 32 48 64Concentration(mg/L)Distance From Source (ft)1st Order DecayInstantaneous ReactionNo DegradationField Data from SiteReturn to