HomeMy WebLinkAbout0403_AnsonLF_culturalresources_19980101,, `.. / ¢ \ t't.200500, LEW YEAR i
, f 'ram'' ,r" Q, /4 , , t I.
$
,. f ; '
/. i f: Q
40
f /� SELL \ 'I - i r"�' '
„, i : : \ `
/ r r
:, ; , '.r I i' +r - L4 ,�a ,.!' 'rCELL . ; !1 + , -'; ' „ I - -
{
48 .
/ 1
! r
\ i
.. .el T-.. t - C✓rLL I '7' 1C- / 31 AN75
d "\1
1,1
II
II
r!
�, / \. 3c t !
sct�:,_ s, l i rti
. • ,, I ri, j 1
.
ws * > i 1
-e...: :,', ✓t' n _. a l., ;.-- 1- -1
<-- r==
I "I )`
/' \ ..- l '
�: , s ,
r'. ;
s ;:: -
r^
I' ,.," qq
�� ; ,. r ,:, „ t 1
Y,,.,, ,, / tt
l = -.,
i' is
/, .. r — =r
( & :. . �. s i. �s
r �' a CFF I '
-.
I,... , . 1 .a ,. 1 i 1 /
Ia 1 3 / 1
.. , >'..: aT .!
r:
. <:, ,
n sr» enmc, / .. , f 7y . c i ,
/;: z' �\
�':
31 AN60 :. _
. y,
r.:�r'.
ism
,
i
.. .: _ . , .. CELL
;- h ; r
:.
{.r o
,
\ +. 1 ✓:
/ i
,[ ` ' ,- ; jar, A {:: .r� :;, \..: r i
L / '�\
\ \ i /
f , .. , / / /
.
,. ., > . p
,.,,, :....: �,, :.
\ \ / ��
/ . % /i
r / �
- t . ...
/r
_.
:�
11
r.:
rr , it t / ✓
i ux.
r
r
'�{ta� l'dr�� <
N� �,_, ra., a
. I I 1. I 1. I I '.:�' t . . . , � I .-', I. -. .— .� .I.'—,.,.�'4�..1.�.I�—'.r ,�.' I..I� .-,1. �� :�;"�"I1.-..: _�...". I 41--1, � 11�_."...".1 . 'I.. "':-"�. �''' , � ,_.I —,'' �.'I' - 1.I'.--.I". I —_�,:I I_.I �'11., . ,�'- ' ��'A;1��/'�'�':,�."' '-" _e �'��.-.:" ����� � ,.....'- '.1<_,'-�%�-�,-, ',,�
-.. ` . , l
,. ..... + \ aa', ram. / �. % /
- RaL> tow � ' _. ... I % %
\ �/ /%/%%
`. _. - -
l -1 1 /, / /� %j / r ��
\ l
, . - , j ;i �' /
y •. z: 3.
/,
-: ,. ,
y -...
,. /
;.. I /
� 1 1 . 'I -, � . .I , : , oI I. .:� I I
� ,��.
�:
II
�, Ii � ,� .1
{
f
. .
t .
,
'' , ,
�/%r
_h .� /.
'
,1. _ , (@� J////
..,,.... , .., .. .�... -.`t, :. .:., .. � '..:. .. \. ... �:'�3?. ,..,..-AK-A1[R1GOff �MNNI •' /.
.., :: , . , ,.. .: ,v ...::. a , .. ,; ,... :.ARE %
...., 4
_.. � .
1
1. a : / % %
.. 1 /
„ . _/ /
v ,., . r/ '
f/ \ * * „ . f
�, r. J
.:�.. :. ,,,.'. t :, ... ,.
ir .. ',. ,.. . , . , `1
,. I ry ,
-
I1
. _ .. r' ..,. .
. r
...�
i
r r .. .. ., ., _ /
nz a <_ C j
,.-.,, r •,.,.:,:',.s >�'�.r;.,: :: . , r,.. :':.:a '.} .. , , , .: : , , .:, , ., naa"uo'sEn ' ;m uixAor�xrr . A r'. I .
,:.'' �.
r ,, _ .. , .
,w , - , f/
,a. , . .,
., _ . - , ,
,,.:. .. , . , , , ��
....,, : ; ... ...a .. .. .. .. ... .. PttaP96m�ACC,C1f1C. 8lM{11NG ht 101 Y FACE mil-
.r.. �. .... :. . _ .. _ _... .. ., r ... ,, ,
:. .A ... ,
a. ... „a. x;:
t SCN E M0�7E < `\ .
/
f'r
II
I
I.
7 �\ c 1 \
rt Y
` r •
3 { '.<. / �'
:> r /..
. ..
,-C .. :. ,.,:. . r
/ l
f/�
- , . /�i
' .'; .' .:: "�.:.. :, : ,,: '.' „ .- ... .. � PRL1'ASEO AAf.XSIR/,mc ".W*G.. - .
,..,.srti.. ...
/
a. l
:
,
, .<,..' .♦ :, _ _. / -::. ARQN"H'.0 ACCESS QO/D ipW MGrWY Y
1,
,.
/
/ \
I
1 .. .
,.. ....1+ ..,,c r :.. .. . .. µCAR
, .. i ;5;. f .:.. .. /.
I
, , ^=
-,:_:
,. , r 'yq
_ ,. > _ ,,' .,, . ., 1 . . ,.,,., .
_ � ,..1
_ ,.
/rl
.,... ,
,. .
Q
g Q-
2'
1. .
uk .r, .,.., r. - is r.. ..: _ , •\
,. , ,, : , -i �.. P. ,,..
a ,
I1I
\
- o , �A y
•
X. <: / }
.. ' ..,r.. a: 4
m
r
}f 9
a,
1
,
i ...
3/99 REVISED ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITE DESIGNATION we1{. 3 .24' qq
K 12/98 REVISED GRADING WSA 2/15/9
NO E$;
,yQ,;•
T 9/98 REV, GRADING, PROPERTY LINE & DETAILS WSA 9/18/98
I. THIS PLAN SHOWS ALL LANDFILL FACILITIES INCLUDING LANDFILL UNITS AND
SEE TITLE SHEET FOR GENERAL LEGEND AND GENERAL
71 1/98 1 REVISED PROPERTY BOUNDARY WSA 1/28/98
LEACHATE FACILITIES PER 15A NCAC 138.1619(d)(1)(8).
NOTES'
I
DES GZA 07/97 PROJECT NO:R97-875-686 CAD: WRB 03/24/99
2• LIMIT OF WASTE PLACEMENT IS 8 FEET INSIDE OF ANCHOR TRENCH LOCATION,
j NRHP-ELIGIBLE ARCHAEOLOGICAL. SITES
f,/ (WILL REQUIRE DATA RECOVERY IF IMPACTED)
PROPOSED LEACHATE RISER VAULT
_
,, .._.._._ ..... .. _... .. -.. _. _.... _.-...._ . -_ ...._.,
- -
ORN PJH 12/18/97 PROJECT:
PROPOSED LEACHATE COLLECTION SUMP
g nol Or�w,n s C' By:
9
CHK SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY
POTENTIALLY NRHP-EL1G18LE SITES - (WILL
Im
I GZA C•eoErrironmenl0l, Inc.
ANSON COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
�' "� r'1• REQUIRE PHASE 11 SIG AND. POSSIBLY, D ^'�,
��r��.'.'. M,; '„,. /' "`*
PROPOSED LEACHATE RISER
i 320 Neednom Slme.t
Ncwto� Upper Foils. MA, 02164
REV WSA 12/31/97 SHEET TITLE: [f T-�
PHA,S,,,E/CELL NOTATION:
RECOVERY IF IMP/'` r \.
j (6171 969. 00 0
MGR. WSA 12/31/97 PROP SITE
PHASE SEQUENCE 1 THROUGH 4)
PROPOSED CELL ES -
. PROPOSED ANCHOR TRENCH FOR
BASE LINER-! IMIT OF LANDFILL
So rce File, c OOd03.dwg O8/O6/96
I..___..—
—ALL
OPER. - DEVELOPMENT —ALL FACILITIES
N
CELL (IN SEQUENCE ALPHABETICALLY)
ZB
---- ---.- --._-- PROPOSED LEACHATL .,VLLECTION PIPE
-••--••-••••--^••- WETLAND LIMITS
— • ---• • --- ' — 100 YEAR FLOOD LEVEL
„„ PROPOSED LEACHATE FORCE MAIN
1'.300•
0 150' S00' 80C'
�
. A�MES_&._..3.dq8/06PRW,
„ -.--„ -,,.
ASSOCIATES, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
111 COMMONWEALTH COURT
A
SHEET No.
CHAMBERS DEVELOPMENT F--3
r
'ARY, NC 2751;
4F NORTH CAROLINA,I INC. DRAYANG No.
I )-- (919) 379-11B7
Rg7-8/5—E3311
/ .�'
j1121I
Additional acres
c.vt id?;:S Uhily•Ch.ti i
contour interval =10 feet
0 mile 3
N h
0 feet 4000
0 kilometer 2
I
PROJECT AREA Map Source: Polkton/Russellville, N.C. Quadrangle, 75 minute.
rigure :-. niase i Survey Area Map of the Approximately 90 Additional Acres.
Anson County Landfill Page - 3
ji,
R 2G5 \ - N N
250
i
J � `
i
\l 1 7
25Q.
c
31Ai*16,q�
�l % 3fANIV
S-
i`
1 er 1
I r r r
275
f �� \
4 r ♦ C i n � (• � \�1 I �� ,� � i \` � ram\ � -,
r
1 a Rac7 ql/
'1w Lj;�- 260
�j1f����l gIJ��Sta'te P snntl ? �] d9
21
-71
lay Uhit hrl I
contour interval = 10 feet
0 mile 1
J 0 feet 4000 Nh
0 kilometer 1
PROJECT AREA Map Source: Polktan/Russellville, N.C. Quadrangle, 7.5 minute_
Figure I Project Area Map of the Five Sites.
Anson County Regional Landfill Page - 3
395
-------------
1 � u� ;0.\ -_�F'� __•,���. �- _ � �.�� / E � � f� iE h and St�rrdivant Q i
Vtom" 2t—
\74
� �� ,'i, ter=' �• 3OD v _ •. �_
250
f260
0 2000 4000
Ft
0 .9w 1000
m
QUADRANGLE
LOCATION Polkton & Russellville Quadrangles
North Carolina - Anson Countv 7.5 minute Series
l figure L. Location of Sites 31AN62 and 31AN83.
31AN62 and 3IAN83 Testing Page - 5
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
_512 North -Salisbury Street • Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
DIVISION OF SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor TELEPHONE: (919) 733-0892 Jonathan R. Howes, Secretary
June 24, 1993
Mr. Gregory C. Cekander
Chambers Development of North Carolina, Inc.
3200 Highlands Parkway, Suite 400
Smyrna, Georgia 30082
Re: Site Plan Application
Proposed Solid Waste Management Facility
Anson County
Dear Mr. Cekander:
The Section has reviewed Chambers response to the 4/22/93
completeness letter. Additional information must be provided
before the application is considered complete. Note that this
information was requested in previous review letters from the
Section. Please provide the requested information in order to
continue the review process.
1. In two previous completeness review letters, the Section
requested that Chambers complete the archaeological study of
the site. The Section understands that numerous potential
sites were located and the sites are in various stages of
investigation. Ten of the identified sites still require
further action.
Two sites are eligible for the National Register of Historic
Places. One of these sites is located in an area that will
not be developed and Chambers plans to protect this site in
place. Provide four copies of the in -place protection plan
for this site. Obtain concurrence with this plan from the
Division of Cultural Resources and provide copies of the
concurrence to the Solid Waste Section. The other site will
be impacted by development since it is located within the
landfill footprint. Chambers plans to recover artifacts from
the site. Obtain concurrence with this plan from the Division
of Cultural Resources. Provide four copies of the data
recovery plan and four copies of the DCR concurrence to the
Solid Waste Section.
P.O. Box 27687, Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 Telephone 919-733-198-1 Fax 19197130513
An Equal Opportunity AHirmadve &&ion Fmployer
r}" I. SD%Wyd�d/107L11O'�-�WA°*£'P't
Mr. Cekander
June 24, 1993
Page 2
Chambers stated that they would not conduct further
archaeological investigation at four sites which require Phase
II investigation. These sites are located in areas which will
never be impacted by development at the MSWLF facility. The
Division of Cultural Resources should be consulted regarding
the decision to cease further investigation at these sites and
protect the sites in place. The Section will concur with
Chambers decision if the Division of Cultural Resources
approves. Chambers will be required to submit plans for the
in -place protection of these sites and obtain concurrence with
these plans from the Division of Cultural Resources. Four
copies of the protection plans and written concurrence from
DCR will be required for submittal to the Solid Waste Section
for inclusion in the site plan application.
There are four sites that will be impacted by development that
also require further investigation. Phase II investigations
shall be completed for these sites. Four copies of the
investigation results shall be submitted to the SWS for
inclusion in the site plan application along with concurrence
with conclusions from the DCR. Further action at these sites
is dependent upon the outcome of the Phase II investigations.
2. Service area for the facility was not addressed in the local
government approval. Chambers mentions in the response letter
Of 1/4/93 that service area is described in the contract and
that the contract was reviewed and approved by the Anson
County Commissioners. Please provide the minutes of the
meeting in which the contract was approved.
Though the application is considered incomplete, the Section
has begun a technical review. The following comments must be
addressed:
1. A general description of any special engineering features
(i.e. spring capture drains) must be included in the
application.
2. Provide one drawing which identifies the entire facility
boundary, landfill footprint, ancillary facilities, wetlands,
locations of significant habitat areas that will be protected,
floodplains, locations of archeological sites eligible for the
National Register of Historic Places and locations of those
sites whose eligibility for NRHP is undetermined but are
proposed for in -place protection on undeveloped areas of the
site. All springs, seeps, or other surface water features
located on within the facility boundary or within the CSX
right-of-way should be included on this drawing as well.
Mr. Cekander
June 24, 1993
Page 3
3. The distribution of diabase dikes on the site needs to be
mapped and sufficient piezometers installed to determine the
hydraulics of the dikes.
4. Additional information must be provided regarding the nature
and locations of faults and their influence on the site's
hydrology.
S. Wells MW-18-SB, MW-17-SB, MW-31-SB, and MW-33-SB have
hydraulic conductivities on the order of 10-3 cm/sec. The
first three wells form a line parallel to a proposed north-
south.fault and the proposed trend of the diabase dike. What
is the origin of this conductive zone and can additional zones
be expected?
I have enclosed a copy of the comments made by the Division of
Environmental Management regarding your application. Responses to
these comments should be incorporated in the site plan application.
If you have any questions or if you would like to schedule a
meeting to discuss these comments, please contact me at (919) 733-
0692.
Sincerely,
Sherri C. Hoyt
Environmental Engineer
Solid Waste Section
cc: Terry Dover
Jim Barber
Mark Fry
GARROW & ASSOCIATES, INC.
417 North Boylan Avenue, Raleigh, North Carolina 27603
Telephone (919) 821-3197 Facsimile (919) 821-9103
Tuesday, May 30,1995
Ms. Renee Gledhill -Early
State Historic Preservation Office
Division of Archives and History
507 North Blount Street
Raleigh, NC 27601
Re: Archaeological Studies for the Anson County Regional Landfill Project.
Dear Ms. Gledhill -Early:
On behalf of Chambers Development Company, Inc. we are submitting a draft Phase II
archaeological report and a proposed draft Memorandum of Agreement concerning
archaeological resources associated with the proposed Anson County Regional Landfill west
of Wadesboro, North Carolina. Chambers has asked us to submit this material to your
office in conjunction with their application for a solid waste permit from the State of North
Carolina and to assist in fulfillment of federal obligations under their Corps of Engineers
wetlands permit.
This cover letter summarizes the current status of archaeological research at the Anson
County landfill, which began with our initial Phase I archaeological survey between
September 1991 and January 1992. That survey resulted in the identification of 17
archaeological sites. In a report submitted in April 1992, Garrow recommended that five of
the 17 did not produce sufficient data to warrant further study or protection. Garrow
recommended that additional testing be conducted at the other 12 sites if they are to be
impacted by landfill development activities. The North Carolina State Historic
Preservation Office (NCSHPO) reviewed the report and concurred with these
recommendations.
In July of 1992, Chambers requested that we conduct Phase II Evaluation studies at five of
the 12 sites that were within what was then defined as the impact zone of landfill facilities
(31AN60, 61, 64, 76, and 127).
These five Phase II studies and survey of 93 acres that was not available during the initial
survey were conducted in September of 1992, with reports submitted in November of 1992.
This research concluded that only one of the five Phase II sites studied (31AN60) appeared
to be significant and recommended that no further studies or protection were needed at the
other four sites examined (31AN61, 64, 76, and 127). The survey of 93 additional acres
identified two new sites (31AN130 and 31AN133) and we recommended that site 31AN130
was not significant and site 31AN133 should be studied further or protected from impacts.
The NCSHPO reviewed the Phase II and Phase I Addendum reports and concurred with our
recommendations.
In 1994, Chambers reduced the size of the parcel that they plan to acquire for the landfill
project, which resulted in several of the potentially significant sites now being completely
Atlanta, Georgia Memphis, Tennessee Latrobe, Pennsylvania
r
Garrow & Associates, Inc. Page - 2
outside the project area. In addition, Chambers has modified the construction plans within
the acquisition parcel to avoid impacts to as many archaeological sites as possible. In April
of 1995, Chambers requested that Garrow conduct Phase II testing studies at two sites that
could not be avoided by project modifications. We have completed these studies, and a
draft report is enclosed with this letter to document our conclusion that neither site is
eligible for the National Register of Historic Places. In summary, Garrow & Associates has
identified the following archaeological sites on the property that Chambers now plans to
acquire:
• Sites 31AN82 and 130 were identified during Phase I survey and NCSHPO has
determined that they are not eligible for the NRHP
• Sites 31AN61, 64, 76, and 127 have been tested by Phase II evaluation studies and the
NCSHPO has determined that they are not eligible for the NRHP
• Site 31AN83 and Loci A and C of Site 31AN62 have been tested by Phase II evaluation
studies. Garrow recommends that they are not eligible for the NRHP and now seeks the
concurrence of the NCSHPO.
• Loci B of Site 31AN62 and Sites 31AN63 and 75 were determined to be potentially
eligible for the NRHP after the Phase I survey, but they are completely outside the
impact area of the landfill. Chambers proposes to preserve these sites and protect them
in perpetuity.
• Site 31AN60 has been determined eligible for the NRHP and will be impacted by landfill
construction. As an impact mitigation measure, data recovery excavation studies will be
conducted at this site prior to any land -altering activities.
To address the need for data recovery at site 31AN60 and for preservation measures at the
other potentially significant sites on the landfill property, we have taken the liberty of
preparing a Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) that stipulates the measures to be taken.
A draft of the proposed MOA is enclosed with this letter for your review and comment.
The MOA will of course have to be negotiated and signed with the Corps of Engineers for
compliance with their federal Section 106 responsibilities, but we wanted to formally
outline the measures that Chambers wants to implement to ensure preservation of
significant archaeological information.
Please call me if you have any questions concerning the status of archaeological sites at the
Anson County Landfill.
Sincerely,
GARROW & ASSOCIATES, INC.
Daniel F. Cassedy, P .
Branch Manager/Assistant Vice President
Enclosures
CC. Jose Urrutia, Chambers
3
D o A Fil-
MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT
SUBMITTED TO THE ADVISORY COUNCIL ON HISTORIC PRESERVATION
PURSUANT TO 36 CFR 800.6(A)
REGARDING THE ANSON COUNTY REGIONAL LANDFILL PROJECT
(ACTION I.D. # 199203131 AND NATIONWIDE PERMIT # 26)
WHEREAS, the Wilmington District of the United States Army Corps
of Engineers (COE) has determined that construction of the Anson
County Regional Landfill will have an effect on properties
eligible for inclusion in the National Register of Historic,
Places, and has consulted with the North Carolina Historic
Preservation Office (SHPO) pursuant to 36 CFR Part 800,
regulations implementing Section 106 of the National Historic
Preservation Act (16 U.S.C. 470f); and
WHEREAS, the developer of the Anson County Regional Landfill,
Chambers of North Carolina, Inc. (Chambers) has participated in
the consultation and has been invited to concur in this Memorandum
of Agreement (MOA);
NOW, THEREFORE, the COE and the North Carolina SHPO agree that the
undertaking will be administered in accordance with the following
stipulations in order to take into account the effect of the
project on historic properties.
Stipulations
The Wilmington District, COE, will monitor the progress of the
stipulated tasks and will incorporate completion of such tasks as
a requirement for permitting of the project. Failure to comply
will result in the withdrawal of the COE permit. The COE will
ensure that the following measures are carried out:
A National Register -eligible Archaeological Sites
The COE will consult with the SHPO and the Council to determine
appropriate treatments for any archaeological sites that have been
determined to be eligible for the National Register of Historic
Places. These include site 31AN60 and any other sites
DRAFT of May 23, 1995
Page - 1
DRAFT
subsequently determined eligible (see Stipulation B, below).
Potential appropriate treatments include the following:
1. Preservation in Place
a. Preservation in place is the preferred treatment, and
Chambers has modified the property boundaries and landfill
construction plans to avoid all but one eligible archaeological
site. All other eligible sites will not be disturbed.
b. A plan to protect eligible archaeological sites avoided
and preserved in place will be developed and implemented in
consultation with the SHPO.
2. Archaeological Data Recovery
a. For any eligible archaeological sites that cannot be
avoided, a data recovery plan for the retrieval of significant
archaeological information will be developed and implemented.
b. A data recovery plan that addresses substantive
research questions will be developed in consultation with the SHPO
for the recovery of significant archaeological data. The plan
will be consistent with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards
and Guidelines for Archaeological Documentation (48 FR 44734-37)
and take into account the Council's publication Treatment of
Archaeological Properties (Advisory Council on Historic
Preservation (draft] 1980) and Guidelines prepared by the North
Carolina Office of State Archaeology. It will specify, at a
minimum, the following:
• the research questions to be addressed through the data
recovery, with an explanation of their relevance and
importance;
• the methods to be used, with an explanation of their
relevance to the research questions;
• the proposed disposition of recovered materials and
records; and,
DRAFT of May 23, 1995
Page - 2
DRAFT
• a proposed schedule for the submission of progress
reports and final reports to the COE, the SHPO, and the
Council.
c. The data recovery plan will be submitted to the COE and
the SHPO for thirty (30) days (from receipt of documentation)
review and approval. Unless the SHPO objects within thirty (30)
days after receipt of the plan, the COE will ensure that it is
implemented.
d. A draft technical report of these investigations will
be prepared by the Principal Investigator and submitted to the
SHPO and the COE. The final report (marked final), incorporating
the SHPO's and the COE's comments will be provided to the SHPO and
the COE for final review. The SHPO will write to the COE as to
the final acceptability of the report.
e. The COE, after consultation with the SHPO, will write
the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation concerning data
recovery results. Documentation will be sent to the Council to
support the finding of mitigation of adverse effect.
f. The COE will ensure that all artifacts recovered during
the archaeological investigations are stabilized and processed for
curation in a repository meeting professional curation standards
in accordance with 36 CFR Part 79. Copies of all records,
including, but not limited to, field notes, forms, maps, catalogue
sheets, and representative photographs (negatives) will be
submitted for curation with the artifacts. Documentation that the
repository has received and accepted these materials will be
supplied to the SHPO.
B. Archaeological Sites Whose Status Has Not Yet Been Determined
Phase I survey identified three archaeological sites within the
landfill property that were determined by the SHPO to require
additional investigations to enable an evaluation of National
Register eligibility. Further studies have been conducted on all
such sites within the currently known area of potential effect,
and all have been determined not eligible for the National
Register. To ensure that potentially significant deposits
currently outside the area of potential effect (Loci B of Site
DRAFT of May 23, 1995
Page - 3
L nn
31AN62 and Sites 31AN63 and 75) are not affected by future
modifications in the landfill project, the COE will ensure that
the following measure is implemented
1. Archaeological Evaluation. Prior to any land disturbing
activities such as (but not restricted to) excavation, tree
clearing, grading, and/or borrowing in the area of sites 31AN63,
site 31AN75, or Loci B of Site 31AN62, a Phase II evaluation study
will be conducted to determine if the site(s) is(are) eligible for
the National Register of Historic Places. If any of the sites are
determined eligible for the National Register, a treatment
consistent with the measures described in Provision A (above) will
be developed and implemented.
C. Late Discoveries. If unanticipated cultural materials or
human skeletal remains are discovered during project landscape -
altering activities or archaeological investigations, Chambers
will cause a temporary halt of these activities and immediately
notify the SHPO and the COE of the late discoveries. This
temporary halt will afford the SHPO the opportunity to assess the
situation and recommend a course of action. These preliminary
recommendations will be made by the SHPO within 48 hours of
notification.
D. Oualifications. All archaeological work conducted in
conjunction with this memorandum will be carried out by or under
the direct supervision of an archaeologist who meets, at a
minimum, the Secretary of the Interior's Professional
Qualifications Standards (48 FR 44738-39).
E. Reports. All reports resulting from research carried out in
compliance with this memorandum will be responsive to contemporary
professional standards and the Secretary of the Interior's Format
Standards (42 FR 5377-79), as well as standards presented in the
North Carolina State Archaeology Guidelines. Copies of the
reports will be filed, at a minimum, with the COE, the SHPO, and
the Research Laboratories of Anthropology at the University of
North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
DRAFT of May 23, 1995
Page - 4
DRAFT
F. Dispute Resolution. The COE and the SHPO will attempt to
resolve any disagreement arising from implementation of this
Agreement. If the COE determines that the disagreement cannot be
resolved, the COE will request the further comments of the Council
in accordance with 36 CFR Part 800.6(b). Any Council comment
provided in response will be considered by the COE in accordance
with 36 CFR Part 800.6(c).
Execution and implementation of this agreement evidences that the
U.S. Army COE of Engineers has satisfied their Section 106
responsibilities for the Anson County Regional Landfill, and that
the COE of Engineers has afforded the Advisory Council on Historic
Preservation and the North Carolina State Historic Preservation
Officer an opportunity to comment on the undertaking and its
effects on historic properties.
SIGNED:
V.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, WILMINGTON DISTRICT
by
Date:
NORTH CAROLINA STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE
by
Concur:
Date:
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation
by
Chambers of North Carolina, Inc.
Date:
by Date:
DRAFT of May 23, 1995
Page - 5
b�j- a3
North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources
James B. Hunt Jr., Governor
Betty Ray McCain, Secretary
October 9, 1997
Paul A. Webb
Branch Manager, Chapel Hill
TRC Garrow Associates, Inc.
6340 Quadrangle Drive, Suite 200
Chapel Hill, NC 27514
Re: Data Recovery Plan, Anson County Regional
Landfill, ER 92-8226, ER 98-7473
Dear Mr. Webb:
Division of Archives and History
Jeffrey J. Crow, Director
Thank you for your letter of September 3, 1997, transmitting the draft data
recovery plan for archaeological investigation of site 31 AN60 at the proposed
Anson County landfill. We have reviewed the proposed plan and feel it is
comprehensive and thorough. We look forward to submission of a draft final report
detailing the results of the data recovery.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic
Preservation Act wand
Sectionthe v106 cisoryod fiedl at 36on 1storic CFR Part 800ation's Regulations
for Compliance
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions
concerning the above comment, please contact Renee Gledhill -Earley, environmental
review coordinator, at 919/733-4763.
Sincerely,
0
David Brook
Deputy State Historic Preservation Officer
DB:slw
c Jim Coffey
Solid Waste Section
Division of Waste Management, DENR
021
109 East Jones Street • Raleigh, North Carolina 27601-2807 13a
Beneath the primary sump of these cells, a secondary sump will be constructed for the collection and
removal of any liquids in the system. Above the secondary geocomposite, the secondary sump will
contain an approximate 15-foot length of 18-inch diameter SDR 17 perforated HDPE pipe surrounded
by crushed stone (AASHTO No. 57 Stone) wrapped with a 10 oz./sy nonwoven geotextile. An 18-inch
diameter SDR 17 solid wall HDPE riser pipe bedded within a trench shall extend up the slope, beneath
the primary geomembrane. Details of the secondary monitoring system can be referenced in the
Engineering Drawings.
Any water entering the secondary monitoring system sump shall be pumped out via a submersible pump
for disposal to the local POTW. Sampling and analysis of the secondary monitoring system shall be
conducted in conjunction with collection samples from the groundwater monitoring wells to determine if
a leak has occurred. Analytical data will be evaluated and compared to groundwater standards and
background conditions of the site.
2 - 12 (Rev. 9/98)
The final landfill surface will include side slope terraces at nominal 40 feet vertical interval. The
side slope terrace will intercept the stonnwater runoff and discharge it to pipe down spouts. The pipe
down spouts will discharge in to the perimeter ditch. The stormwater collected in the perimeter ditch
will be diverted to one of the three sedimentation basins for detention and discharge to the on -site
watercourses which ultimately discharge to the Pinch Gut Creek or Brown Greek. The side slope
terraces, pipe down spouts and the perimeter ditch will be constructed incrementally along with
development of various cells and capping of the areas reaching final grades. Sediment Basin No. 1
located east of the landfill will be constructed and on-line prior to construction of Cell IA.
The proposed perimeter ditch and basins will be vegetated or rip -rapped to minimize potential for
erosion. The outflow from the basins will be controlled by riser -type outlets and discharged to a rip -rap
apron to reduce flow velocities and erosion potential.
As required by the North Carolina Sedimentation Pollution Control Law, Chambers has prepared
a site -specific Erosion and Sediment Control Plan. This Plan includes hydrologic and hydraulic designs
of the proposed control measures and has been submitted to and approved by the NCDENR Land
disturbance activities will be conducted in accordance with the approved plan.
21.11 Enhanced Liner System
An enhanced liner system will be installed in portions of the Phase I landfill footprint where
little or no saturated overburden exists, which includes approximately 2.44 acres of Cell 1B,
_ 4.13 acres of Cell ID, and 5.68 acres of Cell 1 E. The system will be constructed beneath the
"low" end of these cells in areas where leachate accumulation is most likely. The aerial extent
of the enhanced liner system in the affected cells can be seen in the Engineering Drawings.
The proposed primary and enhanced liner systems will consist of the following components
from top to bottom:
■ double -sided heat -bonded secondary geocomposite (6 oz./sy nonwoven
geotextile/geonet/6oz.sy nonwoven geotextile);
■ 60 mil primary textured HDPE geomembrane;
■ double -sided heat -bonded secondary geocomposite (6 oz./sy nonwoven
geotextile/geonet/6oz.sy nonwoven geotextile);
■ 60 mil secondary textured HDPE geomembrane; and
■ 24-inch compacted clay liner.
Beneath the primary sump of these cells, a secondary sump will be constructed for the collection
and removal of any liquids in the enhanced liner system. Above the secondary geocomposite,
the secondary sump will contain an approximate 15-foot length of 18-inch diameter SDR 17
perforated HDPE pipe surrounded by crushed stone (AASHTO No. 57 Stone) wrapped with a
10oz/sy nonwoven geotextile. An 18-inch diameter SDR 17 solid wall HDPE riser pipe bedded
within a trench shall extend up the slope beneath the primary geomembrane. Details of the
enhanced liner system can be referenced in the Engineering Drawings.
2 - 11 (Rev. 9/98)
(Rev. 3/99)
within a trench shall extend up the slope beneath the primary geomembrane. Details of the
enhanced liner system can be referenced in the Engineering Drawings.
Any liquid entering the enhanced liner system sump will be pumped out by a dedicated
automatic submersible pump for proper disposal. Details regarding inspection and monitoring of
the enhanced liner system are set forth in Section 6.0.
2 _ 12 (Rev. 9/98)
(Rev. 3/99)
North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources
James B. Hunt Jr., Governor
Betty Ray McCain, Secretary
March 5, 1998
Tracy L. Millis
TRC Garrow and Associates, Inc.
6340 Quadrangle Drive
Chapel Hill NC 27514
Re: Management Summary, Anson County Regional
Landfill, ER 98-7473, ref. ER 92-8226
Dear Mr. Millis:
z1
Division of Archives and History
Jeffrey J. Crow, Director
h(0
s�
co
a
Thank you for your letter of February 11, 1998, concerning the above project.
We have reviewed the management summary that discusses the data recovery
excavations conducted at site 31 AN60, the Spring Site, in Anson County. Your
client may proceed with permit applications based upon your findings and
recommendations. However, the State Historic Preservation Office cannot fully
evaluate the data recovery effort until we have reviewed the results in detail. Upon
receipt of the draft final report we will gladly continue our review of this project.
Please include a revised site form when submitting the draft final report.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic
Preservation Act and the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations
for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36 CFR Part 800.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions
concerning the above comment, please contact Renee Gledhill -Earley, environmental
review coordinator, at 919/733-4763.
Sincerely,
David Brook
Deputy State Historic Preservation Officer
DB:slw
cc: �m Coffey, Solid Waste Section, DENR
Allen Davis, Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington
OD",
109 East Jones Street • Raleigh, North Carolina 27601-2807 ga
,, `.. / ¢ \ t't.200500, LEW YEAR i
, f 'ram'' ,r" Q, /4 , , t I.
$
,. f ; '
/. i f: Q
40
f /� SELL \ 'I - i r"�' '
„, i : : \ `
/ r r
:, ; , '.r I i' +r - L4 ,�a ,.!' 'rCELL . ; !1 + , -'; ' „ I - -
{
48 .
/ 1
! r
\ i
.. .el T-.. t - C✓rLL I '7' 1C- / 31 AN75
d "\1
1,1
II
II
r!
�, / \. 3c t !
sct�:,_ s, l i rti
. • ,, I ri, j 1
.
ws * > i 1
-e...: :,', ✓t' n _. a l., ;.-- 1- -1
<-- r==
I "I )`
/' \ ..- l '
�: , s ,
r'. ;
s ;:: -
r^
I' ,.," qq
�� ; ,. r ,:, „ t 1
Y,,.,, ,, / tt
l = -.,
i' is
/, .. r — =r
( & :. . �. s i. �s
r �' a CFF I '
-.
I,... , . 1 .a ,. 1 i 1 /
Ia 1 3 / 1
.. , >'..: aT .!
r:
. <:, ,
n sr» enmc, / .. , f 7y . c i ,
/;: z' �\
�':
31 AN60 :. _
. y,
r.:�r'.
ism
,
i
.. .: _ . , .. CELL
;- h ; r
:.
{.r o
,
\ +. 1 ✓:
/ i
,[ ` ' ,- ; jar, A {:: .r� :;, \..: r i
L / '�\
\ \ i /
f , .. , / / /
.
,. ., > . p
,.,,, :....: �,, :.
\ \ / ��
/ . % /i
r / �
- t . ...
/r
_.
:�
11
r.:
rr , it t / ✓
i ux.
r
r
'�{ta� l'dr�� <
N� �,_, ra., a
. I I 1. I 1. I I '.:�' t . . . , � I .-', I. -. .— .� .I.'—,.,.�'4�..1.�.I�—'.r ,�.' I..I� .-,1. �� :�;"�"I1.-..: _�...". I 41--1, � 11�_."...".1 . 'I.. "':-"�. �''' , � ,_.I —,'' �.'I' - 1.I'.--.I". I —_�,:I I_.I �'11., . ,�'- ' ��'A;1��/'�'�':,�."' '-" _e �'��.-.:" ����� � ,.....'- '.1<_,'-�%�-�,-, ',,�
-.. ` . , l
,. ..... + \ aa', ram. / �. % /
- RaL> tow � ' _. ... I % %
\ �/ /%/%%
`. _. - -
l -1 1 /, / /� %j / r ��
\ l
, . - , j ;i �' /
y •. z: 3.
/,
-: ,. ,
y -...
,. /
;.. I /
� 1 1 . 'I -, � . .I , : , oI I. .:� I I
� ,��.
�:
II
�, Ii � ,� .1
{
f
. .
t .
,
'' , ,
�/%r
_h .� /.
'
,1. _ , (@� J////
..,,.... , .., .. .�... -.`t, :. .:., .. � '..:. .. \. ... �:'�3?. ,..,..-AK-A1[R1GOff �MNNI •' /.
.., :: , . , ,.. .: ,v ...::. a , .. ,; ,... :.ARE %
...., 4
_.. � .
1
1. a : / % %
.. 1 /
„ . _/ /
v ,., . r/ '
f/ \ * * „ . f
�, r. J
.:�.. :. ,,,.'. t :, ... ,.
ir .. ',. ,.. . , . , `1
,. I ry ,
-
I1
. _ .. r' ..,. .
. r
...�
i
r r .. .. ., ., _ /
nz a <_ C j
,.-.,, r •,.,.:,:',.s >�'�.r;.,: :: . , r,.. :':.:a '.} .. , , , .: : , , .:, , ., naa"uo'sEn ' ;m uixAor�xrr . A r'. I .
,:.'' �.
r ,, _ .. , .
,w , - , f/
,a. , . .,
., _ . - , ,
,,.:. .. , . , , , ��
....,, : ; ... ...a .. .. .. .. ... .. PttaP96m�ACC,C1f1C. 8lM{11NG ht 101 Y FACE mil-
.r.. �. .... :. . _ .. _ _... .. ., r ... ,, ,
:. .A ... ,
a. ... „a. x;:
t SCN E M0�7E < `\ .
/
f'r
II
I
I.
7 �\ c 1 \
rt Y
` r •
3 { '.<. / �'
:> r /..
. ..
,-C .. :. ,.,:. . r
/ l
f/�
- , . /�i
' .'; .' .:: "�.:.. :, : ,,: '.' „ .- ... .. � PRL1'ASEO AAf.XSIR/,mc ".W*G.. - .
,..,.srti.. ...
/
a. l
:
,
, .<,..' .♦ :, _ _. / -::. ARQN"H'.0 ACCESS QO/D ipW MGrWY Y
1,
,.
/
/ \
I
1 .. .
,.. ....1+ ..,,c r :.. .. . .. µCAR
, .. i ;5;. f .:.. .. /.
I
, , ^=
-,:_:
,. , r 'yq
_ ,. > _ ,,' .,, . ., 1 . . ,.,,., .
_ � ,..1
_ ,.
/rl
.,... ,
,. .
Q
g Q-
2'
1. .
uk .r, .,.., r. - is r.. ..: _ , •\
,. , ,, : , -i �.. P. ,,..
a ,
I1I
\
- o , �A y
•
X. <: / }
.. ' ..,r.. a: 4
m
r
}f 9
a,
1
,
i ...
3/99 REVISED ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITE DESIGNATION we1{. 3 .24' qq
K 12/98 REVISED GRADING WSA 2/15/9
NO E$;
,yQ,;•
T 9/98 REV, GRADING, PROPERTY LINE & DETAILS WSA 9/18/98
I. THIS PLAN SHOWS ALL LANDFILL FACILITIES INCLUDING LANDFILL UNITS AND
SEE TITLE SHEET FOR GENERAL LEGEND AND GENERAL
71 1/98 1 REVISED PROPERTY BOUNDARY WSA 1/28/98
LEACHATE FACILITIES PER 15A NCAC 138.1619(d)(1)(8).
NOTES'
I
DES GZA 07/97 PROJECT NO:R97-875-686 CAD: WRB 03/24/99
2• LIMIT OF WASTE PLACEMENT IS 8 FEET INSIDE OF ANCHOR TRENCH LOCATION,
j NRHP-ELIGIBLE ARCHAEOLOGICAL. SITES
f,/ (WILL REQUIRE DATA RECOVERY IF IMPACTED)
PROPOSED LEACHATE RISER VAULT
_
,, .._.._._ ..... .. _... .. -.. _. _.... _.-...._ . -_ ...._.,
- -
ORN PJH 12/18/97 PROJECT:
PROPOSED LEACHATE COLLECTION SUMP
g nol Or�w,n s C' By:
9
CHK SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY
POTENTIALLY NRHP-EL1G18LE SITES - (WILL
Im
I GZA C•eoErrironmenl0l, Inc.
ANSON COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
�' "� r'1• REQUIRE PHASE 11 SIG AND. POSSIBLY, D ^'�,
��r��.'.'. M,; '„,. /' "`*
PROPOSED LEACHATE RISER
i 320 Neednom Slme.t
Ncwto� Upper Foils. MA, 02164
REV WSA 12/31/97 SHEET TITLE: [f T-�
PHA,S,,,E/CELL NOTATION:
RECOVERY IF IMP/'` r \.
j (6171 969. 00 0
MGR. WSA 12/31/97 PROP SITE
PHASE SEQUENCE 1 THROUGH 4)
PROPOSED CELL ES -
. PROPOSED ANCHOR TRENCH FOR
BASE LINER-! IMIT OF LANDFILL
So rce File, c OOd03.dwg O8/O6/96
I..___..—
—ALL
OPER. - DEVELOPMENT —ALL FACILITIES
N
CELL (IN SEQUENCE ALPHABETICALLY)
ZB
---- ---.- --._-- PROPOSED LEACHATL .,VLLECTION PIPE
-••--••-••••--^••- WETLAND LIMITS
— • ---• • --- ' — 100 YEAR FLOOD LEVEL
„„ PROPOSED LEACHATE FORCE MAIN
1'.300•
0 150' S00' 80C'
�
. A�MES_&._..3.dq8/06PRW,
„ -.--„ -,,.
ASSOCIATES, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
111 COMMONWEALTH COURT
A
SHEET No.
CHAMBERS DEVELOPMENT F--3
r
'ARY, NC 2751;
4F NORTH CAROLINA,I INC. DRAYANG No.
I )-- (919) 379-11B7
Rg7-8/5—E3311