19012_SSQAPP_Thomasville Plant B_11-22-2019

Site-Specific QAPP Addendum
For Brownfields Site Assessment
Thomasville Plant B
310 Fisher Ferry Street
Thomasville, North Carolina
North Carolina Department of Environmental
Quality Brownfields Project
No. 19012-15-029
Prepared by:
Hart & Hickman, PC
Prepared for: Piedmont Triad Regional Council Kernersville, North Carolina
Agreement Number: BF-00D72418-0
H&H Job No. PTR-002 November 22, 2019
C Engineering: #C-1269 NC Geology: #-245
.Piedmont T riad'RegiooalCoune1l KemCTS\iJk,NC BF--OOD724l &-(1 .Siu.��fic Q:APP Addendum 3l{ffisher Ferry Street TiiomasvilJe, North Carolina U.S. Environmental Protection AgencyApprovals: Cindy Nolan -USEP A, Region 4 -Project Officer and Designated Approving Official Date November 22, 2019 Pagel
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality Brownfie.lds Program Approvals:
8zf�(1M�� Cody J. Cannon -DEQ, Brownfields Program­Project Manager II /;2s-/2()1 9 � I Date This _Site-Specific Quality Assurance Project Plan (QAPP) Addendum has be.en prepared in accordance with USEPA Region 4's Brownfields Program. This document is valid for the subject project and it is meant to be used in conjunction with the Piedmont Triad Regional Council Generic
Quality Assurance Project Plan for Brown.fields Site Assessments dated July 10, 2019 and previously approved by USEP A Region 4 for the Piedmont Triad Regional Council (PTRC) in Kernersville, North Carolina (grant number BF-00D72418-0). The work described herein will be performed in accordance with the processes described in the Generic QAPP. \\HHFSOJ\MastcrFilcs\AAA-Mastcr Projccts\PTRC\PTR002\Thomasvi11c Furniture Plant B Sitc\Sitc-Spccific QAPP\Rcvision l\SSQAPP _Thomasville Plant B_l l-22-2019.docx
hart '$, hickman
SMARTER ENVIRONMENTAL SOl.UTIONS
01/17/2020
Piedmont Triad Regional Council Kernersville, NC BF-00D72418-0
Site-Specific QAPP Addendum 310 Fisher Ferry Street Thomasville, North Carolina
November 22, 2019 Page 3

\\HHFS01\MasterFiles\AAA-Master Projects\PTRC\PTR002\Thomasville Furniture Plant B Site\Site-Specific QAPP\Revision 1\SSQAPP_Thomasville Plant B_11-22-2019.docx
A2. Table of Contents
A1. Title and Approval Sheet .......................................................................................................1
A2. Table of Contents ...................................................................................................................3
A3. Distribution List .....................................................................................................................5
A4. Project Organization..............................................................................................................6
A5. Background/Problem Definition ...........................................................................................7
A6. Project Description/Timeline ..............................................................................................21
A7. Special Training Requirements and Special Certifications .............................................25
A8. Documentation and Records ...............................................................................................26
B1. Sampling Process Design .....................................................................................................27
B2. Sampling & Analytical Method Requirements .................................................................37
B3. Sampling Handling and Custody Requirements ...............................................................40
B4. Analytical Methods and Requirements ..............................................................................41
B5. Field Quality Control Requirements ..................................................................................42
B6. Laboratory Quality Control Requirements .......................................................................43
B7. Field Equipment & Corrective Action ...............................................................................44
B8. Lab Equipment & Corrective Action .................................................................................45
B9. Analytical Sensitivity & Project Criteria ...........................................................................46
B10. Data Management and Documents ...................................................................................47
C1. Assessment and Response Actions ......................................................................................48
C2. Project Reports .....................................................................................................................49
D1. Field Data Evaluation ..........................................................................................................50
D2. Laboratory Data Evaluation ...............................................................................................53
D3. Data Usability and Project Evaluation...............................................................................54

Piedmont Triad Regional Council Kernersville, NC BF-00D72418-0
Site-Specific QAPP Addendum 310 Fisher Ferry Street Thomasville, North Carolina
November 22, 2019 Page 4

\\HHFS01\MasterFiles\AAA-Master Projects\PTRC\PTR002\Thomasville Furniture Plant B Site\Site-Specific QAPP\Revision 1\SSQAPP_Thomasville Plant B_11-22-2019.docx

Tables
Table 1 Sample Summary Table
Table 2 Sampling and Analytical Method Requirements
Table 3 Laboratory Analytical Quality Control
Table 4 Analytical Sensitivity and Project Criteria

Figures
Figure 1 Site Location Map
Figure 2 Site Map
Figure 3 Proposed Sampling Locations

Appendices
Appendix A Organizational Chart
Appendix B Health and Safety Plan

Piedmont Triad Regional Council Kernersville, NC BF-00D72418-0
Site-Specific QAPP Addendum 310 Fisher Ferry Street Thomasville, North Carolina
November 22, 2019 Page 5

\\HHFS01\MasterFiles\AAA-Master Projects\PTRC\PTR002\Thomasville Furniture Plant B Site\Site-Specific QAPP\Revision 1\SSQAPP_Thomasville Plant B_11-22-2019.docx
A3. Distribution List

Ms. Cindy Nolan USEPA Region 4 Project Officer and Designated Approving Officer RCR Division
Materials & Waste Management Branch
61 Forsyth Street, SW Atlanta, GA 30303 [phone] [e-mail]

Mr. Cody J. Cannon DEQ Brownfields Project Manager Division of Waste Management Brownfields Program
217 West Jones Street
Raleigh, NC 27603 [phone] [e-mail]
Mr. Jesse Day
Brownfields Grant Program Manager Piedmont Triad Regional Council 1398 Carrollton Crossing Drive Kernersville, NC 27284
[phone]
[e-mail] Mr. Leonard Moretz, PG Project Manager
Hart & Hickman, PC
3921 Sunset Ridge Road, Suite 301 Raleigh, NC 27607 [phone] [e-mail]

Mr. Justin Ballard, PG QA/QC Officer Hart & Hickman, PC 3921 Sunset Ridge Road, Suite 301
Raleigh, NC 27607
[phone] [e-mail]
Piedmont Triad Regional Council Kernersville, NC BF-00D72418-0
Site-Specific QAPP Addendum 310 Fisher Ferry Street Thomasville, North Carolina
November 22, 2019 Page 6

\\HHFS01\MasterFiles\AAA-Master Projects\PTRC\PTR002\Thomasville Furniture Plant B Site\Site-Specific QAPP\Revision 1\SSQAPP_Thomasville Plant B_11-22-2019.docx

A4. Project Organization

A description of project organization is provided in the Piedmont Triad Regional Council Generic
Quality Assurance Project Plan for Brownfields Site Assessments dated July 10, 2019. Prism
Laboratories, Inc. (Prism) was selected to provide laboratory analyses for this project. No other
modifications or additions to these processes as outlined in the Generic QAPP are proposed in this
Site-Specific QAPP Addendum. A Project Organization Chart is included as Appendix A.
Piedmont Triad Regional Council Kernersville, NC BF-00D72418-0
Site-Specific QAPP Addendum 310 Fisher Ferry Street Thomasville, North Carolina
November 22, 2019 Page 7

\\HHFS01\MasterFiles\AAA-Master Projects\PTRC\PTR002\Thomasville Furniture Plant B Site\Site-Specific QAPP\Revision 1\SSQAPP_Thomasville Plant B_11-22-2019.docx
A5. Background/Problem Definition

Site Location
The former Thomasville Plant B (the Site) is covered under this Site-Specific QAPP Addendum
and is located at 310 Fisher Ferry Street in Thomasville, Davidson County, North Carolina
(Davidson County Parcel Identification Number 6777-02-85-5713). The Site consists of one
parcel of land that is approximately 11.53 acres and has been vacant since 2002. North Hamby
Creek, a North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) Class C surface water body,
bisects the central portion of the Site.
The Site received eligibility into the DEQ Brownfields Program via a Letter of Eligibility dated
April 15, 2016. A Site location map is included as Figure 1 and a Site map is included as Figure
2.

Property Ownership
The City of Thomasville currently owns the Site and has signed an access agreement with the
PTRC allowing Brownfields assessment activities on the property.

Proposed Future Reuse/Redevelopment Plans for the Property
The City of Thomasville anticipates the Brownfields property will be redeveloped for recreational
and open space purposes.

Historic Site Use
The Site was utilized for furniture manufacturing from approximately 1908 through 2002. During
this time, woodworking, assembly, drying, veneer, and finishing operations were performed in
manufacturing buildings located in the southwestern and northeastern portions of the Site. At an
unknown date between the 1930s and 1940s, the veneer and panel facility in the northeastern
portion of the Site was demolished, followed by construction of a lumber shed by the early 1960s.
Furniture manufacturing continued at the Site until December 2002. In 2017-2018, all structures
Piedmont Triad Regional Council Kernersville, NC BF-00D72418-0
Site-Specific QAPP Addendum 310 Fisher Ferry Street Thomasville, North Carolina
November 22, 2019 Page 8

\\HHFS01\MasterFiles\AAA-Master Projects\PTRC\PTR002\Thomasville Furniture Plant B Site\Site-Specific QAPP\Revision 1\SSQAPP_Thomasville Plant B_11-22-2019.docx
were razed and debris from demolition activities were either disposed of off-Site or have been
temporarily stored in a pile in the south-central portion of the Site.

Adjacent Property Uses
The north adjacent properties consist of single-family residences. To the northeast of the Site are
R Lo’s Pub & Grill and Watts Lawn and Garden. To the east of the Site is the Southern Railway
and Handy Storage, a storage facility. South of the property is the Southern Railway, and single-
family residences beyond that. To the southwest is Parkdale Mills, a yarn production facility. To
the west of the Site are a vacant parcel and a warehouse space historically utilized by Kaby Mills,
a textile manufacturer, which ceased operations in 2001. The Kaby Mills site is currently zoned
for light industrial usage.

Known or Likely Chemicals/Contaminants of Concern
H&H reviewed a previous Phase I ESA (Apex Companies, LLC, 2004) conducted at the Site. At
the time of the Phase I, the Site buildings were still present. The Phase I identified the following
areas of concern (AOCs):

• AOC-1 – Interior staining and cracks on the floor of the basement in the northern area of
the former southern manufacturing building adjacent to the former spraying room and paint
storage building.
• AOC-2 – A concrete basin of unknown historical use located north of a room previously
used for spraying in the former southern manufacturing building.
• AOC-3 – A former boiler room located on the east side of the southern manufacturing
building was used to incinerate hazardous wastes, including carbide sludge and vinyl
acetate.
• AOC-4 – Up to four spray booths were formerly located in the central portion of the former
southern manufacturing building. Spraying equipment used to lacquer, stain, seal, and top
coat were cleaned with solvents. Spent solvents were disposed of in five-gallon buckets
and transferred to a satellite storage area on the second floor of the former southern
manufacturing building, where they were stored in 55-gallon drums.
Piedmont Triad Regional Council Kernersville, NC BF-00D72418-0
Site-Specific QAPP Addendum 310 Fisher Ferry Street Thomasville, North Carolina
November 22, 2019 Page 9

\\HHFS01\MasterFiles\AAA-Master Projects\PTRC\PTR002\Thomasville Furniture Plant B Site\Site-Specific QAPP\Revision 1\SSQAPP_Thomasville Plant B_11-22-2019.docx
• AOC-5 – A sump with exposed underground piping is located on the southern bank of
North Hamby Creek in the west-central portion of the Site.
• AOC-6 – Based on age of the former facility, surface topography, and presence of piping,
a septic system may have existed in the southwestern portion of the Site to the north of the
southern manufacturing building.
• AOC-7 – Storage areas in the western portion of the Site, east of the former southern
manufacturing building, and in the north-central portion of the Site were utilized for
unknown purposes. Staining and evidence of a possible aboveground storage tank (AST)
were observed in the storage building east of the former southern manufacturing building.
• AOC-8 – Potential evidence of ASTs in the form of piping and concrete pads were
observed in two areas north of the former southern manufacturing building near the water
tower.
• AOC-9 – An area of stressed vegetation was observed on the western portion of the
property on the southern bank of North Hamby Creek.
• AOC-10 – Staining and overturned five-gallon buckets were observed in the north central
portion of the Site north of North Hamby Creek.
• AOC-11 – The potential for release associated with chemicals (i.e., hydraulic oil, etc.) used
to operate three former elevator locations in the former southern manufacturing building.
• AOC-12 – Based on the age of the former southern manufacturing building, it is likely that
lead based paint, asbestos containing materials (ACM), and/or polychlorinated biphenyls
(PCBs)-containing caulks were used during the construction of the building and may still
be present in demolition debris currently staged on-Site. During an asbestos survey
completed by ECS Carolinas, LLP in 2011, non-dilapidated areas of the building were
surveyed and non-friable ACM was found in multiple locations. The buildings have all
been demolished since the asbestos survey was completed.
• AOC-13 – The potential for release associated with an off-Site upgradient laundry,
chemical mixing company, and multiple petroleum facilities.

Piedmont Triad Regional Council Kernersville, NC BF-00D72418-0
Site-Specific QAPP Addendum 310 Fisher Ferry Street Thomasville, North Carolina
November 22, 2019 Page 10

\\HHFS01\MasterFiles\AAA-Master Projects\PTRC\PTR002\Thomasville Furniture Plant B Site\Site-Specific QAPP\Revision 1\SSQAPP_Thomasville Plant B_11-22-2019.docx
Conceptual Site Model
Based on the previous Phase I ESA, H&H developed the following conceptual Site model for the
Site:

Site Description
The Site is located at 310 Fisher Ferry Street (Davidson County, North Carolina (Davidson),
Thomasville, Davidson County, North Carolina and consists of one parcel of land that is
approximately 11.53 acres. The Site was formerly improved with 13 industrial warehouse
buildings totaling approximately 206,000 square feet. All of the buildings were demolished in
2017-2018, however concrete foundations and asphalt areas remain.

Topography
7.5-Minute Topographic Map: High Point West, NC (dated 1993) Site Elevation: 800-810 feet above mean sea level
Topographic Gradient: north and south bisected by North Hamby Creek

Topography generally slopes toward the south in the northern portion of the Site and to the north
in the southern portion of the Site and is bisected by North Hamby Creek. A copy of the USGS
topographic quadrangle map is provided as Figure 1.

Piedmont Triad Regional Council Kernersville, NC BF-00D72418-0
Site-Specific QAPP Addendum 310 Fisher Ferry Street Thomasville, North Carolina
November 22, 2019 Page 11

\\HHFS01\MasterFiles\AAA-Master Projects\PTRC\PTR002\Thomasville Furniture Plant B Site\Site-Specific QAPP\Revision 1\SSQAPP_Thomasville Plant B_11-22-2019.docx
Geology
The Site is located in the Piedmont Physiographic Province of North Carolina. The land surface
of the area is generally characterized as gently sloping, which may become moderately steep where
dissected by streams. According to the Geologic Map of North Carolina dated 1985, the Site lies
within the Carolina Slate Belt. In the Site area, underlying bedrock is composed of low-grade
metamorphosed volcanic rock characterized by slaty cleavages.

In the Piedmont, the bedrock is overlain by a mantle of weathered rock called saprolite or
residuum. The saprolite consists of unconsolidated clay, silt, and sand with lesser amounts of rock
fragments. Due to the range of parent rock types and their variable weathering characteristics, the
saprolite ranges widely in color, texture, and thickness. Generally, the saprolite is thickest near
interstream divides and thins toward streambeds. In profile, the saprolite normally grades from
clayey soils near the land surface to highly weathered rock above the competent bedrock.

Hydrogeology
The occurrence and movement of ground water in the Piedmont is typically within two separate
but interconnected water-bearing zones. A shallow water-bearing zone occurs within the saprolite,
and a deeper water-bearing zone within the underlying bedrock.

Ground water in the shallow saprolite zone occurs in the interstitial pore spaces between the grains
comprising the saprolite soils. Ground water in this zone is typically under water table or
unconfined conditions. In general, ground water migrates laterally from recharge areas to small
streams that serve as localized discharge points.

The occurrence and movement of ground water in the underlying water-bearing zone within the
crystalline bedrock is controlled by secondary joints, fractures, faults, and dikes within the
bedrock. On a regional scale, the direction of ground water flow is typically from uplands to major
streams and ground water sinks. The saprolite has a higher porosity than the bedrock and serves
as a reservoir that supplies water to a network of fractures in the bedrock.
Piedmont Triad Regional Council Kernersville, NC BF-00D72418-0
Site-Specific QAPP Addendum 310 Fisher Ferry Street Thomasville, North Carolina
November 22, 2019 Page 12

\\HHFS01\MasterFiles\AAA-Master Projects\PTRC\PTR002\Thomasville Furniture Plant B Site\Site-Specific QAPP\Revision 1\SSQAPP_Thomasville Plant B_11-22-2019.docx
Groundwater flow at the subject Site is expected to mimic surface topography and would likely
flow from the north and south of the site to North Hamby Creek. Based on the Site being bisected
by North Hamby Creek, depth to groundwater at the Site is estimated to be present at depths
ranging from approximately 10-25 feet below ground surface (ft bgs).

Problem Definition

The objective of this Brownfields Site Assessment is to collect quality data to evaluate whether
previous Site uses may have resulted in the release of contaminants that would pose a potential
environmental risk for the future Site uses. The City of Thomasville anticipates this area will be
a used for recreational and open space purposes.

Project-specific assessment planning was addressed using the seven-step Data Quality Objective
(DQO) Process presented in USEPA’s Guidance on Systematic Planning Using the Data Quality
Objectives Process (February 2006). The seven DQO steps are presented below.

Piedmont Triad Regional Council Kernersville, NC BF-00D72418-0
Site-Specific QAPP Addendum 310 Fisher Ferry Street Thomasville, North Carolina
November 22, 2019 Page 13

\\HHFS01\MasterFiles\AAA-Master Projects\PTRC\PTR002\Thomasville Furniture Plant B Site\Site-Specific QAPP\Revision 1\SSQAPP_Thomasville Plant B_11-22-2019.docx
Step 1: State the Problem

The purpose of this project is to collect soil, groundwater, surface water, and sediment data to
evaluate whether historic Site uses may have released contaminants that would pose a potential
environmental risk for future Site uses. Specifically, the assessment activities will be conducted
in accordance with a June 20, 2019 Additional Assessment Request by the DEQ Brownfields
Program. This Site-Specific QAPP Addendum focuses on gathering data pertinent to future
recreational and open space Site use.

As referenced in the June 2019 Additional Assessment Request, the following additional
assessment activities are recommended:

• Installation and sampling of temporary monitoring wells to investigate a former boiler
room used to incinerate hazardous wastes (AOC-3), potential releases associated with spent
solvent used in four spray booths areas (AOC-4), former storage areas (AOC-7), and
potential releases associated with an off-Site upgradient laundry, chemical mixing
company, and multiple petroleum facilities (AOC-13).

• Collection of soil samples to investigate AOCs associated with the above proposed
monitoring well borings (AOC-3, AOC-4, AOC-7, and AOC-13), a concrete basin located
north of a room previously used for spraying (AOC-2), potential releases associated with
spent solvent used in four spray booths areas (AOC-4), a potential former septic system
(AOC-6), potential ASTs (AOC-8), a former 10,000-gallon water tower; and potential
releases associated with the former Standard Oil Company (AOC-13).

• Collection of two background soil samples from southwestern and eastern portions of the
Site.

• Collection of surface water and sediment samples collected from North Hamby Creek to
investigate a sump with exposed underground piping (AOC-5), a potential former septic
system (AOC-6), the upgradient portion of North Hamby Creek in
Piedmont Triad Regional Council Kernersville, NC BF-00D72418-0
Site-Specific QAPP Addendum 310 Fisher Ferry Street Thomasville, North Carolina
November 22, 2019 Page 14

\\HHFS01\MasterFiles\AAA-Master Projects\PTRC\PTR002\Thomasville Furniture Plant B Site\Site-Specific QAPP\Revision 1\SSQAPP_Thomasville Plant B_11-22-2019.docx
the vicinity of the eastern Site boundary, and the downgradient portion of North Hamby
Creek in the vicinity of the western Site boundary.

• Completion of a receptor survey.

Evaluation of Risk for Site Redevelopment
The Site conceptual model and potential exposure pathways, as they relate to the Site, are
summarized as follows:

• If impacted, soils may potentially serve as a leaching source for groundwater impacts.

• If impacted, soil and groundwater may potentially pose an exposure risk to future Site users
via direct contact or inhalation of particulates or organic vapors (vapor intrusion).

• If impacted, soil and groundwater may potentially pose an exposure risk to construction
workers by way of direct contact or inhalation of particulates or organic vapors during
excavation work.

Constraints on the defined sampling efforts include the following:

• The sampling schedule is constrained in that PTRC would like to complete the project as
soon as possible. PTRC’s grant ends in September 2021.

• The cost of sampling is constrained by PTRC’s total assessment grant funds which have
been distributed for multiple Site assessments.

Piedmont Triad Regional Council Kernersville, NC BF-00D72418-0
Site-Specific QAPP Addendum 310 Fisher Ferry Street Thomasville, North Carolina
November 22, 2019 Page 15

\\HHFS01\MasterFiles\AAA-Master Projects\PTRC\PTR002\Thomasville Furniture Plant B Site\Site-Specific QAPP\Revision 1\SSQAPP_Thomasville Plant B_11-22-2019.docx
Step 2: Identify the Decision

USEPA’s DQO guidance suggests stating what decision must be made in the form of a “study
question.” The primary study question for the activity is:

Based upon the results of the Site assessment, can the Site be made safe for recreational
and open space use?

Depending on the answer to this question, the following subsequent actions/responses may be
appropriate:

1. If results indicate a contaminant release has occurred at the Site and the release poses a
potential threat to human health or the environment, further evaluation, remediation, and/or
engineering controls (i.e., land use development restrictions, engineered barriers) may be
required to ensure the safety of the future Site users.

2. If results indicate there has not been a release that poses a potential threat to human health
or the environment, then no further evaluation will be necessary, and it is unlikely that the
Site poses a risk to future Site users.

3. If results indicate a release has occurred at the Site, further evaluation may be required to
meet State regulatory requirements.

Combining the principal study question with the alternative actions identified above yields the
decision statement for this DQO analysis:

Determine whether the Site is safe for recreational and open space use or what actions
need to be taken so that the Site can be made safe for such reuse.

Piedmont Triad Regional Council Kernersville, NC BF-00D72418-0
Site-Specific QAPP Addendum 310 Fisher Ferry Street Thomasville, North Carolina
November 22, 2019 Page 16

\\HHFS01\MasterFiles\AAA-Master Projects\PTRC\PTR002\Thomasville Furniture Plant B Site\Site-Specific QAPP\Revision 1\SSQAPP_Thomasville Plant B_11-22-2019.docx
Step 3: Identify the Inputs to the Decision

The USEPA’s DQO process requires identification of the information needed to make the desired
decision. The information required for sampling at the Site includes:

• Exposure pathways that may result in an unacceptable exposure risk.

• Constituents and their concentrations that may pose a potential threat to human health or
the environment.

• State regulatory guidance for hazardous substances.

Potential exposure pathways will be identified based on the proposed land use. As noted
previously, the Town of Mayodan anticipates this area will be used for recreational and open space
purposes. Therefore, primary potential exposure pathways include:

• Site users could be exposed to contaminants via direct contact with and/or particulate or
vapor inhalation from impacted soil, groundwater, surface water, or sediment.

• Construction workers could be exposed to contaminants via direct contact with and/or
particulate or vapor inhalation from impacted soil or vapor inhalation from impacted
groundwater during excavation work.

• Construction workers could be exposed to contaminants via direct contact with and/or
vapor inhalation from impacted shallow groundwater during excavation work. Depth to
groundwater at the Site is anticipated to be less than 20 ft bgs but actual depth is likely
variable. Based on the depth to groundwater, the most likely route of exposure would be
through vapor inhalation.

Piedmont Triad Regional Council Kernersville, NC BF-00D72418-0
Site-Specific QAPP Addendum 310 Fisher Ferry Street Thomasville, North Carolina
November 22, 2019 Page 17

\\HHFS01\MasterFiles\AAA-Master Projects\PTRC\PTR002\Thomasville Furniture Plant B Site\Site-Specific QAPP\Revision 1\SSQAPP_Thomasville Plant B_11-22-2019.docx
An evaluation of analytical data with applicable contaminant screening criteria will be used to
determine if the Site is safe for redevelopment based upon the future use or what actions need to
be taken to make the Site safe for redevelopment for this use. It is possible that the results of the
assessment could be used to dictate future land use.

The concentrations of contaminants will be compared to applicable regulatory screening levels
specified in Section A6 of this Site-Specific QAPP Addendum.

Based on a review of previous assessment data, H&H proposes to analyze select Site samples for
volatile organic compounds (VOCs), semi-volatile organic compounds (SVOCs), Resource
Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) metals, and hexavalent chromium as detailed on Table
1. Quality Assurance (QA)/Quality Control (QC) requirements for these analyses are discussed
further in Section B6.

Step 4: Define the Boundaries of the Study

Defining the “boundaries of the study” refers to deciding what scope of sampling and analysis is
required to determine if a release has occurred. The proposed sampling will take place within the
boundary of the Site. The boundaries of the study are also related to temporal, spatial, and vertical
aspects of potential impacts.

With regard to spatial issues, the QAPP guidance refers to “defining the scale of decision making”
which, simply stated, means how closely spaced should the samples be to support the decision that
must be made. The sampling design for the Site includes discrete sample locations at areas where
the potential for impact exists (i.e., former USTs, potential hazardous material storage areas, etc.).
However, if obvious surficial contamination is known or suspected based upon field observations,
samples will be biased to those areas. Soil samples will be collected from soil borings advanced
by direct push technology (DPT) equipment.

Piedmont Triad Regional Council Kernersville, NC BF-00D72418-0
Site-Specific QAPP Addendum 310 Fisher Ferry Street Thomasville, North Carolina
November 22, 2019 Page 18

\\HHFS01\MasterFiles\AAA-Master Projects\PTRC\PTR002\Thomasville Furniture Plant B Site\Site-Specific QAPP\Revision 1\SSQAPP_Thomasville Plant B_11-22-2019.docx
Defining the scale of decision also concerns the size of the decision unit (i.e., is the unit the whole
Site or the physical boundaries of the entire Site, or is the decision unit an area immediately
surrounding an impacted area or potential source). For this project, the scale of decision concerns
the physical boundary of the Site. That is, for the most part, data from the soil and groundwater
samples will be used to make decisions concerning the entire Site. However, if contamination
appears isolated, then the analytical data may be used to make decisions about a particular area of
the Site.

Step 5: Develop a Decision Rule

The DQO process recommends that an “if … then” rule be developed to specify what action should
be taken for the possible sampling and analysis outcomes. This Step 5 “decision rule” is an
integration of the “decision statement” identified in Step 2 and the risk-based action levels noted
in Step 3. The “if/then” decision rule for the subject Site is as follows:

If constituent concentrations are above their respective screening level for a particular
exposure pathway for a future user, then further evaluation to determine risk or to meet
regulatory requirements may be necessary for the subject Site, or corrective action
(including engineering controls) may be required for the Site. Otherwise, no further
evaluation is necessary.

If corrective action is deemed necessary, the data collected during the Brownfields assessment will
likely be sufficient to complete remedial planning, including estimation of quantities of impacted
material and associated costs of corrective action. Data collected during the Brownfields
assessment, which will be utilized in remedial planning, include analytical data from soil,
groundwater, surface water, and sediment, visual observations of staining/discoloration to surficial
soils (horizontal extent) and subsurface soils (vertical extent), and photo-ionization detector (PID)
readings/obvious olfactory observations of odors (horizontal and vertical extent).

Piedmont Triad Regional Council Kernersville, NC BF-00D72418-0
Site-Specific QAPP Addendum 310 Fisher Ferry Street Thomasville, North Carolina
November 22, 2019 Page 19

\\HHFS01\MasterFiles\AAA-Master Projects\PTRC\PTR002\Thomasville Furniture Plant B Site\Site-Specific QAPP\Revision 1\SSQAPP_Thomasville Plant B_11-22-2019.docx
Steps 6 and 7: Specify Tolerable Limits on Decision Errors and Optimize the Design for
Obtaining Data

Because Steps 6 and 7 are closely interdependent, they have been combined into one discussion in
this Site-Specific QAPP Addendum.

The primary concern for this Site investigation relating to decision errors is the potential for false
positives or false negatives in the data. There is a potential that data will indicate contamination
exists, but the area is not actually contaminated (referred to as a false positive). The potential
consequences of this error are that PTRC or the prospective developer will spend additional money
on additional assessment activities or corrective action. A false positive result may also put the
project at risk and hinder potential redevelopment.

In the event that Site data indicate a significant concern with regard to future Site development, it
is likely that additional data would be collected to further characterize this condition. In such an
instance, it is most likely that the false positive would be revealed during the supplemental
sampling and decisions made according to the new data.

Conversely, the data may indicate the Site is not contaminated but the Site is actually impacted
above some level of concern (referred to as a false negative). In this instance, there is the potential
that the Site could pose a risk for future Site users which was not identified (i.e., the Site could be
determined safe for use as a commercial/industrial facility, when in fact it may not be).

In the case of a false negative, it is highly unlikely that the erroneous data will be of a magnitude
or frequency that results in an incorrect decision regarding the entire Site. Rather, the false
negative will likely be associated with a single or small number of sample locations.
Consequently, the risk to the future Site user potentially posed by the false negative is reduced
because the user will be exposed to Site-wide conditions, the majority of which will have been
accurately characterized.

Piedmont Triad Regional Council Kernersville, NC BF-00D72418-0
Site-Specific QAPP Addendum 310 Fisher Ferry Street Thomasville, North Carolina
November 22, 2019 Page 20

\\HHFS01\MasterFiles\AAA-Master Projects\PTRC\PTR002\Thomasville Furniture Plant B Site\Site-Specific QAPP\Revision 1\SSQAPP_Thomasville Plant B_11-22-2019.docx
In addition to errors from false positive and negatives, there is also the possibility of sampling
errors and measurements errors. Examples of these types of errors based on the project’s sample
design and analytical program are listed below.

Examples Where Potential Sampling Errors May Occur
1) Field homogenization techniques (for non-volatile analyses)
2) Sample selection for analysis
3) Number of samples collected
4) Sample locations
5) Decontamination

Examples of Potential Measurement Errors (3 potential types)
1) Physical Sample Collection
• Insufficient sample volume collected
• Improper sample extraction

2) Sample Handling
• Improper preservation techniques
• Improper packaging
• Labeling errors
• Transportation concerns/damage
• Improper sample storage

3) Analysis
• Improper preparation
• Improper extraction
• Erroneous analytical determination
• Erroneous data reduction

The step-by-step procedures described in the Generic QAPP and this Site-Specific QAPP
Addendum minimize these types of potential errors. In addition, the Project Manager will conduct
field and data audits as needed to minimize data error. For these reasons, the proposed sampling
design is deemed to meet data quality objectives for this project.
Piedmont Triad Regional Council Kernersville, NC BF-00D72418-0
Site-Specific QAPP Addendum 310 Fisher Ferry Street Thomasville, North Carolina
November 22, 2019 Page 21

\\HHFS01\MasterFiles\AAA-Master Projects\PTRC\PTR002\Thomasville Furniture Plant B Site\Site-Specific QAPP\Revision 1\SSQAPP_Thomasville Plant B_11-22-2019.docx
A6. Project Description/Timeline

Project Work Tasks to be Performed

Work tasks to be performed at the Site include the following:

1) Public and private utility location surveys prior to drilling activities.

2) Advancement of soil borings using DPT methods to obtain soil samples for visual
characterization, field screening, and laboratory analyses.

3) Installation and sampling of temporary groundwater monitoring wells.

4) Surveying and measurement of temporary monitoring well top of casing elevations to
determine the approximate groundwater flow direction.

5) Completion of a receptor survey within a 1,500-foot radius of the Site.

6) Locate sampling locations and Site features with a global positioning system (GPS) unit.

7) Evaluation of data and preparation of an assessment report.

A detailed description of the proposed sampling and analysis plan to address the identified areas
of concern at the subject Site is presented in Section B1.

Piedmont Triad Regional Council Kernersville, NC BF-00D72418-0
Site-Specific QAPP Addendum 310 Fisher Ferry Street Thomasville, North Carolina
November 22, 2019 Page 22

\\HHFS01\MasterFiles\AAA-Master Projects\PTRC\PTR002\Thomasville Furniture Plant B Site\Site-Specific QAPP\Revision 1\SSQAPP_Thomasville Plant B_11-22-2019.docx
Media and Sampling Parameters/Off-Site Laboratory Testing

• Media-specific samples to be collected and analyses to be performed are outlined in Table
1. In general, samples will be analyzed for VOCs, SVOCs, RCRA metals, and hexavalent
chromium.
Field Measurements and Field Analytical Testing

Field measurements are associated with the following:
• Utility locating survey
• Mapping sampling locations
• Measuring temporary well top of casing elevations
• Depth to water readings
• Field readings of pH, conductivity, temperature, and turbidity
Field analytical testing will include the following:
• Field screening of soil samples using visual methods and a PID

Off-Site laboratory analytical testing will include the following:
• VOCs
• SVOCs
• RCRA metals and hexavalent chromium

A summary of these analytical methods is included in Table 2.

Piedmont Triad Regional Council Kernersville, NC BF-00D72418-0
Site-Specific QAPP Addendum 310 Fisher Ferry Street Thomasville, North Carolina
November 22, 2019 Page 23

\\HHFS01\MasterFiles\AAA-Master Projects\PTRC\PTR002\Thomasville Furniture Plant B Site\Site-Specific QAPP\Revision 1\SSQAPP_Thomasville Plant B_11-22-2019.docx
Critical/Non-Critical Data

The laboratory analytical data is judged to be critical data; whereas, field measurements and other
field methods are judged to be non-critical and will be used in a supporting role.

Project Screening Criteria

Media-specific data will be compared to the following contaminant screening levels:

• Soil – compounds detected in soil samples will be compared to the DEQ Residential
and Industrial/Commercial Health-Based Preliminary Soil Remediation Goals
(PSRGs) – May 2019 or current update.

• Groundwater – compounds detected in groundwater samples will be compared to Title
15A NCAC 2L Groundwater Quality Standards (2L Standards) – April 2013 or current
update. Compounds detected in groundwater samples will also be compared to DEQ
Residential and Non-Residential Groundwater Screening Levels (GWSLs) for Vapor
Intrusion – February 2018 or current update.

• Surface Water – compounds detected in surface water samples will be compared to the
Title 15A NCAC 2B Surface Water Quality Standards (2B Standards) – June 2019 or
current update.

• Sediment – compounds detected in sediment will be compared to the DEQ Residential
and Industrial/Commercial Health-Based Preliminary Soil Remediation Goals
(PSRGs)- May 2019 or current update.

Piedmont Triad Regional Council Kernersville, NC BF-00D72418-0
Site-Specific QAPP Addendum 310 Fisher Ferry Street Thomasville, North Carolina
November 22, 2019 Page 24

\\HHFS01\MasterFiles\AAA-Master Projects\PTRC\PTR002\Thomasville Furniture Plant B Site\Site-Specific QAPP\Revision 1\SSQAPP_Thomasville Plant B_11-22-2019.docx
Project Schedule

After USEPA Region 4 approval of this Site-Specific QAPP Addendum is received, H&H will
prepare and mobilize to conduct field activities. Field activities are expected to take up to ten days
to complete. Laboratory analytical results are expected within 5-7 business days from receipt of
samples. Once laboratory analytical data are received, H&H estimates it will up to four weeks for
preparation of the assessment report. Below is a tentative project schedule.

Tentative Project Schedule
Activity Anticipated Initiation Date Anticipated Completion Date Deliverable Anticipated Deliverable Date
Prepare Site-Specific QAPP
Addendum
October 25, 2019 November 1, 2019 Draft Electronic file November 1, 2019
Response to QAPP Review Comments November 1, 2019 November 15, 2019 Final Electronic Copy November 22, 2019
Scheduling of contractors November 22, 2019 December 2, 2019 None None
Phase II assessment January 6, 2020 January 10, 2020 None None
Laboratory analysis January 13, 2020 January 17, 2020 Laboratory analytical data report January 17, 2020
Tabulate data, prepare report January 17, 2019 January 24, 2020 Brownfield Assessment Report January 24, 2020
Update Property Profile Form January 27, 2020 February 3, 2020 Update ACRES Profile Form February 3, 2020
Piedmont Triad Regional Council Kernersville, NC BF-00D72418-0
Site-Specific QAPP Addendum 310 Fisher Ferry Street Thomasville, North Carolina
November 22, 2019 Page 25

\\HHFS01\MasterFiles\AAA-Master Projects\PTRC\PTR002\Thomasville Furniture Plant B Site\Site-Specific QAPP\Revision 1\SSQAPP_Thomasville Plant B_11-22-2019.docx
A7. Special Training Requirements and Special Certifications

Information regarding special training requirements and special certifications is included in the
Piedmont Triad Regional Council Generic Quality Assurance Project Plan for Brownfields Site
Assessments dated July 10, 2019. A health and safety plan (HASP) for this Site is provided in
Appendix B. No specialized training requirements that are not addressed in the Generic QAPP or
the attached HASP are deemed necessary for this project.
Piedmont Triad Regional Council Kernersville, NC BF-00D72418-0
Site-Specific QAPP Addendum 310 Fisher Ferry Street Thomasville, North Carolina
November 22, 2019 Page 26

\\HHFS01\MasterFiles\AAA-Master Projects\PTRC\PTR002\Thomasville Furniture Plant B Site\Site-Specific QAPP\Revision 1\SSQAPP_Thomasville Plant B_11-22-2019.docx
A8. Documentation and Records

Information regarding documentation and records is included in the Piedmont Triad Regional
Council Generic Quality Assurance Project Plan for Brownfields Site Assessments dated July 10,
2019. No modifications or additions to these processes as outlined in the approved Generic QAPP
are proposed in this Site-Specific QAPP Addendum.

Piedmont Triad Regional Council Kernersville, NC BF-00D72418-0
Site-Specific QAPP Addendum 310 Fisher Ferry Street Thomasville, North Carolina
November 22, 2019 Page 27

\\HHFS01\MasterFiles\AAA-Master Projects\PTRC\PTR002\Thomasville Furniture Plant B Site\Site-Specific QAPP\Revision 1\SSQAPP_Thomasville Plant B_11-22-2019.docx
B1. Sampling Process Design

This section provides a detailed description of the proposed sampling and analysis plan to address
the potential impacts at the subject Site. Sample locations and parameters were selected based on
DEQ’s 2019 Additional Assessment Request and represent information derived from historic Site
uses, Site reconnaissance, future Site uses, and the project objective to provide quality data to
evaluate exposure risk for the future use of the Site as a recreation property.

A tabulated summary of the sampling strategy is presented in Table 1. Proposed sample locations
are depicted on Figure 3; however, these locations may be adjusted in the field based on field
screening, visual observations, occurrence of subsurface utilities, or field conditions (i.e. access).

Soil Sampling

Four (4) surficial soil borings (SB-1 through SB-4) will be advanced to evaluate potential releases
associated with AOC-2, AOC-3, AOC-6, AOC-7, and AOC-8, six (6) composite soil samples (SB-
5 through SB-10) will be advanced to evaluate potential releases associated with AOC-4, AOC-
13, and the former water tower, and six (6) soil borings (SB-11 through SB-16) will be advanced
to evaluate potential releases associated with AOC-3, AOC-4, AOC-7, and AOC-13. In addition,
two (2) background soil samples (BG-1 and BG-2) will be advanced in the southwestern and
eastern portions of the Site to establish background conditions.

To reduce the potential for encountering unmarked subsurface utilities, all soil borings will be
advanced utilizing a decontaminated, stainless steel hand auger. Soil borings will be advanced at
the following locations for the laboratory analyses:

• SB-1 – one soil boring will be advanced in the area where staining and evidence of a
possible AST were observed in the storage building east of the former southern
manufacturing building (AOC-7). The sample will be collected at a depth of approximately
2 ft bgs and submitted for laboratory analysis of VOCs by EPA Method 8260, SVOCs by
Piedmont Triad Regional Council Kernersville, NC BF-00D72418-0
Site-Specific QAPP Addendum 310 Fisher Ferry Street Thomasville, North Carolina
November 22, 2019 Page 28

\\HHFS01\MasterFiles\AAA-Master Projects\PTRC\PTR002\Thomasville Furniture Plant B Site\Site-Specific QAPP\Revision 1\SSQAPP_Thomasville Plant B_11-22-2019.docx
EPA Method 8270, and RCRA Metals by EPA Methods 6020/7471. Additionally, the
sample will be collected for hexavalent chromium and put on hold for potential analysis by
EPA Method 7199. H&H will direct the laboratory to hold the hexavalent chromium
analyses pending the results of the total chromium analyses.

• SB-2 – one soil boring will be advanced in the vicinity of a concrete basin located north of
a room previously used for spraying in the former southern manufacturing building (AOC-
2). The sample will be collected at a depth of approximately 2 ft bgs and submitted for
laboratory analysis of VOCs by EPA Method 8260, SVOCs by EPA Method 8270, and
RCRA Metals by EPA Methods 6020/7471. Additionally, the sample will be collected for
hexavalent chromium and put on hold for potential analysis by EPA Method 7199. H&H
will direct the laboratory to hold the hexavalent chromium analyses pending the results of
the total chromium analyses.

• SB-3 – one soil boring will be advanced in the vicinity of potential ASTs in two areas north
of the former southern manufacturing building near the water tower (AOC-8). The sample
will be collected at a depth of approximately 2 ft bgs and submitted for laboratory analysis
of VOCs by EPA Method 8260, SVOCs by EPA Method 8270, and RCRA Metals by EPA
Methods 6020/7471. Additionally, the sample will be collected for hexavalent chromium
and put on hold for potential analysis by EPA Method 7199. H&H will direct the
laboratory to hold the hexavalent chromium analyses pending the results of the total
chromium analyses.

• SB-4 – one soil boring will be advanced in the vicinity of a potential septic system in the
southwestern portion of the Site to the north of the southern manufacturing building (AOC-
6). The sample will be collected at a depth of approximately 2 ft bgs and submitted for
laboratory analysis of VOCs by EPA Method 8260, SVOCs by EPA Method 8270, and
RCRA Metals by EPA Methods 6020/7471. Additionally, the sample will be collected for
hexavalent chromium and put on hold for potential analysis by EPA Method 7199. H&H
Piedmont Triad Regional Council Kernersville, NC BF-00D72418-0
Site-Specific QAPP Addendum 310 Fisher Ferry Street Thomasville, North Carolina
November 22, 2019 Page 29

\\HHFS01\MasterFiles\AAA-Master Projects\PTRC\PTR002\Thomasville Furniture Plant B Site\Site-Specific QAPP\Revision 1\SSQAPP_Thomasville Plant B_11-22-2019.docx
will direct the laboratory to hold the hexavalent chromium analyses pending the results of
the total chromium analyses.

• SB-5 through SB-8 – four composite samples will be collected from each of the four spray
booths (one composite sample per spray booth) formerly located in the central portion of
the former southern manufacturing building (AOC-4). Each composite sample will be
comprised of soil from four grab sample locations (i.e., aliquots) collected from
approximately 1 to 2 ft bgs within each spray booth. The selected sample aliquots will be
identified based on visual, olfactory and PID screening observations and will be combined
and homogenized to form one composite soil sample representative of soil conditions
within that respective spray booth. The composite soil samples will be collected directly
into dedicated laboratory-supplied sample containers and submitted for laboratory analysis
SVOCs by EPA Method 8270 and RCRA metals plus hexavalent chromium by EPA
Methods 6020/7471. Additionally, the samples will be collected for hexavalent chromium
and put on hold for potential analysis by EPA Method 7199. H&H will direct the
laboratory to hold the hexavalent chromium analyses pending the results of the total
chromium analyses. In addition to the composite soil samples described above, one
representative grab soil sample will also be collected from each of the four spray booth
areas based on visual, olfactory and PID screening observations. The grab soil samples
will be collected from undisturbed portions of soil directly into laboratory-supplied
glassware and for laboratory analysis of VOCs by EPA Method 8260.

• SB-9 – one composite sample will be collected from the 10,000-gallon water tower
formerly located north of the former southern manufacturing building. The composite
sample will be comprised of soil from four grab sample locations (i.e., aliquots) collected
from approximately 1 to 2 ft bgs. The selected sample aliquots will be identified based on
visual, olfactory and PID screening observations and will be combined and homogenized
to form one composite soil sample representative of soil conditions within that area. The
composite soil sample will be collected directly into dedicated laboratory-supplied sample
containers and submitted for laboratory analysis SVOCs by EPA Method 8270 and RCRA
metals plus hexavalent chromium by EPA Methods 6020/7471.
Piedmont Triad Regional Council Kernersville, NC BF-00D72418-0
Site-Specific QAPP Addendum 310 Fisher Ferry Street Thomasville, North Carolina
November 22, 2019 Page 30

\\HHFS01\MasterFiles\AAA-Master Projects\PTRC\PTR002\Thomasville Furniture Plant B Site\Site-Specific QAPP\Revision 1\SSQAPP_Thomasville Plant B_11-22-2019.docx
Additionally, the sample will be collected for hexavalent chromium and put on hold for
potential analysis by EPA Method 7199. H&H will direct the laboratory to hold the
hexavalent chromium analyses pending the results of the total chromium analyses. In
addition to the composite soil sample described above, one representative grab soil sample
will also be collected based on visual, olfactory, and PID screening observations. The grab
soil sample will be collected from undisturbed portions of soil directly into laboratory-
supplied glassware and for laboratory analysis of VOCs by EPA Method 8260.

• SB-10 – one composite sample will be collected from the vicinity of the off-Site upgradient
Standard Oil Company petroleum facility (AOC-13). The composite sample will be
comprised of soil from four grab sample locations (i.e., aliquots) collected from
approximately 1 to 2 ft bgs. The selected sample aliquots will be identified based on visual,
olfactory and PID screening observations and will be combined and homogenized to form
one composite soil sample representative of soil conditions within that area. The composite
soil sample will be collected directly into dedicated laboratory-supplied sample containers
and submitted for laboratory analysis SVOCs by EPA Method 8270 and RCRA metals plus
hexavalent chromium by EPA Methods 6020/7471. Additionally, the sample will be
collected for hexavalent chromium and put on hold for potential analysis by EPA Method
7199. H&H will direct the laboratory to hold the hexavalent chromium analyses pending
the results of the total chromium analyses. In addition to the composite soil sample
described above, one representative grab soil sample will also be collected based on visual,
olfactory, and PID screening observations. The grab soil sample will be collected from
undisturbed portions of soil directly into laboratory-supplied glassware and for laboratory
analysis of VOCs by EPA Method 8260.

• SB-11 through SB-16 – six surficial (0-2 feet bgs) soil samples will be collected during
installation of the six temporary monitoring wells associated with AOC-3, AOC-4, AOC-
7, and AOC-13. In addition to the surficial soil samples, if field observations indicate
potential impacts based on elevated PID readings, staining, and/or petroleum/solvent
odors, a sample will also be collected from a 2-ft interval representative of the potential
Piedmont Triad Regional Council Kernersville, NC BF-00D72418-0
Site-Specific QAPP Addendum 310 Fisher Ferry Street Thomasville, North Carolina
November 22, 2019 Page 31

\\HHFS01\MasterFiles\AAA-Master Projects\PTRC\PTR002\Thomasville Furniture Plant B Site\Site-Specific QAPP\Revision 1\SSQAPP_Thomasville Plant B_11-22-2019.docx
impacts and submitted for laboratory analysis of VOCs by EPA Method 8260, SVOCs by
EPA Method 8270, and RCRA Metals by EPA Methods 6020/7471. Additionally, the
sample(s) will be collected for hexavalent chromium and put on hold for potential analysis
by EPA Method 7199. H&H will direct the laboratory to hold the hexavalent chromium
analyses pending the results of the total chromium analyses. Note that if impacts are not
observed in the temporary monitoring well borings, only the surficial soil samples will be
collected for laboratory analysis.

• BG-1 & BG-2 – two surficial (approximately 0-2 ft bgs) background samples will be
collected in undisturbed portions in the southwestern and eastern portions of the Site for
laboratory analysis of RCRA Metals by EPA Methods 6020/7471. Additionally, the
samples will be collected for hexavalent chromium and put on hold for potential analysis
by EPA Method 7199. H&H will direct the laboratory to hold the hexavalent chromium
analyses pending the results of the total chromium analyses.

Soil collected from all borings will be continuously screened in the field using a calibrated PID.
Soil samples described above will all be collected at the 0-2 ft bgs interval for exposure purposes.
However, should soils exhibit evidence of impact (i.e., elevated PID readings, staining, and/or
petroleum/solvent odors), additional samples will be submitted for laboratory analysis.

Standard operating procedures (SOPs), which include the DEQ Inactive Hazardous Sites Branch
(IHSB) Guidelines for Assessment and Cleanup dated October 2015, and the most recent versions
of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Region IV Science and Ecosystem Support
Division (SESD) Field Branches Quality System and Technical Procedures guidance, are included
in Attachment A of the Generic QAPP. Investigation derived waste (IDW), including soil cuttings
and decontamination water, from the assessment activities will be containerized pending results of
analytical data. The IDW will then be shipped off-Site for disposal, unless analytical data and/or
DEQ regulations allow for spreading IDW on-Site. If no obvious contamination is found using
field screening methods and therefore no samples collected for laboratory analyses, the soil
cuttings and decontamination water will be spread/discharged on the ground. After samples are
Piedmont Triad Regional Council Kernersville, NC BF-00D72418-0
Site-Specific QAPP Addendum 310 Fisher Ferry Street Thomasville, North Carolina
November 22, 2019 Page 32

\\HHFS01\MasterFiles\AAA-Master Projects\PTRC\PTR002\Thomasville Furniture Plant B Site\Site-Specific QAPP\Revision 1\SSQAPP_Thomasville Plant B_11-22-2019.docx
collected, borings will be abandoned and the surfaces will be patched. The coordinates for the soil
boring locations will be located using a GPS unit with sub-meter accuracy.

Piedmont Triad Regional Council Kernersville, NC BF-00D72418-0
Site-Specific QAPP Addendum 310 Fisher Ferry Street Thomasville, North Carolina
November 22, 2019 Page 33

\\HHFS01\MasterFiles\AAA-Master Projects\PTRC\PTR002\Thomasville Furniture Plant B Site\Site-Specific QAPP\Revision 1\SSQAPP_Thomasville Plant B_11-22-2019.docx
Groundwater Sampling

As mentioned in Section A5, groundwater flow is expected to follow surface topography and flow
north in the southern portion of the Site and south in the northern portion of the Site toward North
Hamby Creek. Six temporary monitoring wells are proposed for installation and the subsequent
collection of groundwater samples at the following locations:

• TMW-1 – one temporary monitoring well will be installed within the central portion of the
former spraying rooms (AOC-4). A sample will be submitted for laboratory analysis of
VOCs by EPA Method 8260, SVOCs by EPA Method 8270, and RCRA Metals by EPA
Methods 6020/7470.

• TMW-2 – one temporary monitoring well will be installed downgradient of the upgradient
laundry, chemical mixing company, and Standard Oil Company petroleum facility north
of the Site (AOC-13). A sample will be submitted for laboratory analysis of VOCs by EPA
Method 8260, SVOCs by EPA Method 8270, and RCRA Metals by EPA Methods
6020/7470.

• TMW-3 – one temporary monitoring well will be installed within the former boiler room
used to incinerate hazardous wastes (AOC-3). A sample will be submitted for laboratory
analysis of VOCs by EPA Method 8260, SVOCs by EPA Method 8270, and RCRA Metals
by EPA Methods 6020/7470.

• TMW-4 – one temporary monitoring well will be installed within the western storage area
footprint (AOC-7). A sample will be submitted for laboratory analysis of VOCs by EPA
Method 8260, SVOCs by EPA Method 8270, and RCRA Metals by EPA Methods
6020/7470.

• TMW-5 and TMW-6 – two temporary monitoring wells will be installed downgradient of
two petroleum facilities upgradient and east of the Site (AOC-13). A sample will be
Piedmont Triad Regional Council Kernersville, NC BF-00D72418-0
Site-Specific QAPP Addendum 310 Fisher Ferry Street Thomasville, North Carolina
November 22, 2019 Page 34

\\HHFS01\MasterFiles\AAA-Master Projects\PTRC\PTR002\Thomasville Furniture Plant B Site\Site-Specific QAPP\Revision 1\SSQAPP_Thomasville Plant B_11-22-2019.docx
submitted for laboratory analysis of VOCs by EPA Method 8260, SVOCs by EPA Method
8270, and RCRA Metals by EPA Methods 6020/7470.

The approximate locations of the proposed temporary monitoring wells are depicted on Figure 3;
however, exact locations will be determined based upon field conditions. The temporary
monitoring wells will be advanced using a DPT rig to estimated depths of up to 30 ft bgs.

The temporary monitoring wells will be constructed of 2-inch diameter PVC with 10 or 15 ft of
pre-pack well screen (due to sampling for metals) set to bracket the water table (estimated at
between approximately 5 to 15 ft bgs) and 2-inch diameter PVC well casing to the ground surface.
A sand filter pack will extend from below the base to approximately 2 ft above the top of the pre-
packed well screens followed by at least 2 ft of hydrated bentonite.

The temporary monitoring wells will be developed by removing a minimum of 3 to 5 well volumes
using a submersible pump, surging the well during pumping, and observing stable field parameters
(i.e. pH ± 0.1 SU and conductivity varies no more than 5%). Prior to sampling, the wells will be
purged such that samples from the wells are representative of the aquifer rather than static water
in the casing. Purging and sampling of the monitoring wells will be completed using the low
flow/low stress pump methods in general accordance with EPA Region 4 SESD Field Branches
Quality System and Technical Procedures (included in Attachment A of the Generic QAPP).
During purging, water quality meters will be used to measure pH, temperature, dissolved oxygen,
oxidation reduction potential, turbidity, and conductivity at 3 to 5-minute intervals. Purging will
be considered complete when water quality parameters stabilize (i.e. pH ± 0.1 SU, conductivity
varies no more than 5%, and turbidity is less than 10 Nephelometric Turbidity Units [NTUs]). If
turbidity cannot be reduced below 10 NTUs in the monitoring well despite best efforts, H&H will
re-develop the monitoring well in accordance with EPA Region IV SESD protocols to remove silt
and fines in the well and sand pack.

Once groundwater parameters stabilize, groundwater samples from the temporary monitoring
wells will be collected directly into laboratory supplied sample containers. VOC samples will be
Piedmont Triad Regional Council Kernersville, NC BF-00D72418-0
Site-Specific QAPP Addendum 310 Fisher Ferry Street Thomasville, North Carolina
November 22, 2019 Page 35

\\HHFS01\MasterFiles\AAA-Master Projects\PTRC\PTR002\Thomasville Furniture Plant B Site\Site-Specific QAPP\Revision 1\SSQAPP_Thomasville Plant B_11-22-2019.docx
collected using the “soda straw” method to minimize volatile loss through the peristaltic pump
head. The sample containers will be labeled with the sample identification, date, and requested
analysis, and then placed in a laboratory supplied cooler and iced. The samples will be delivered
to a North Carolina certified laboratory under standard chain of custody protocols for analysis of
VOCs by EPA Method 8260, SVOCs by EPA Method 8270, and RCRA metals by EPA Methods
6020/7470.

Upon completion of groundwater sampling activities, the temporary monitoring wells will be
surveyed and depth to groundwater information will be collected. Groundwater sample locations
will be recorded in the field using a hand-held GPS unit. The temporary monitoring wells will
then be properly abandoned by a licensed well driller and surfaces will be repaired to generally
match pre-drilling conditions.

Surface Water and Sediment Sampling

Five co-located surface water and sediment samples (SW-1/SED-1 through SW-4/SED-4) will be
collected from the North Hamby Creek, which bisects the Site. Samples will be collected during
base flow conditions starting from downstream locations moving to the upstream locations.
Samples will be collected from the following locations:

• SW/SED-1 – One co-located surface water and sediment sample will be collected in the
vicinity of where North Hamby Creek exits the Site on the western property boundary.

• SW/SED-2 – One co-located surface water and sediment sample will be collected near the
sump with pipe leading to the south side of North Hamby Creek (AOC-6).

• SW/SED-3 – One co-located surface water and sediment sample will be collected near the
sump with exposed underground piping on the south side of North Hamby Creek (AOC-
5).

Piedmont Triad Regional Council Kernersville, NC BF-00D72418-0
Site-Specific QAPP Addendum 310 Fisher Ferry Street Thomasville, North Carolina
November 22, 2019 Page 36

\\HHFS01\MasterFiles\AAA-Master Projects\PTRC\PTR002\Thomasville Furniture Plant B Site\Site-Specific QAPP\Revision 1\SSQAPP_Thomasville Plant B_11-22-2019.docx
• SW/SED-4 – One co-located surface water and sediment sample will be collected in the
vicinity of where North Hamby Creek enters the Site on the eastern property boundary.

If necessary, H&H will utilize a small boat to access the sampling locations. H&H will utilize
water quality meters to collect measurements of pH, temperature, dissolved oxygen, oxidation
reduction potential, turbidity, and specific conductivity of surface water at each sample location.

Surface water samples will be collected by placing the laboratory-supplied sample containers
directly into the flowing stream and allowing the bottles to fill with water. Sediment samples will
then be collected from the base of the surface water body at each sample location using a
decontaminated stainless-steel hand auger, AMS dredger, or other suitable method dependent on
stream bank and boat access conditions. The sample containers will be labeled with the sample
identification, date, and requested analysis, and placed in a laboratory supplied cooler and iced.
The surface water and sediment samples will be delivered to a North Carolina certified laboratory
under standard chain of custody protocols for analysis of VOCs by EPA Method 8260, SVOCs by
EPA Method 8270, and RCRA metals by EPA Methods 6020/7470/7471. In addition, sediment
samples will be collected for hexavalent chromium and put on hold for potential analysis by EPA
Method 7199. H&H will direct the laboratory to hold the hexavalent chromium analyses pending
the results of the total chromium analyses. Lastly, surface water samples will be submitted for
analysis of hardness by Standard Method 2340B to calculate North Carolina surface water
standards for metals which are hardness dependent.

Upon completion of sampling, the co-located surface water and sediment sample locations will be
recorded in the field using a hand-held GPS unit.
Piedmont Triad Regional Council Kernersville, NC BF-00D72418-0
Site-Specific QAPP Addendum 310 Fisher Ferry Street Thomasville, North Carolina
November 22, 2019 Page 37

\\HHFS01\MasterFiles\AAA-Master Projects\PTRC\PTR002\Thomasville Furniture Plant B Site\Site-Specific QAPP\Revision 1\SSQAPP_Thomasville Plant B_11-22-2019.docx
B2. Sampling & Analytical Method Requirements

Sample Summary Table
A sample summary table is provided in Table 1 that clarifies and reflects the sampling process
design described in Section B1. In addition to the proposed number and type of field samples and
analyses, the number and type of QA samples and analyses are also summarized in Table 1. The
required number, size and type of sample container, sample preservation, and maximum sample
holding times are outlined for each analytical parameter in Table 2. Proposed sample locations
are depicted on Figure 3. The following analytical methods will be utilized during the project:

• VOCs will be analyzed by EPA Method 8260B
• SVOCs will be analyzed by EPA Method 8270D
• RCRA metals and hexavalent chromium will be analyzed by EPA Methods 6020 (with
mercury analyzed by EPA Method 7471B [soil] and 7470A [groundwater] and EPA
Method 7199 for hexavalent chromium [soil and sediment only])

Required Sample Collection Procedures
Soil and groundwater samples will be collected into laboratory-supplied glassware following the
methods listed in Section B1. Samples collected for VOC analyses will not be homogenized. VOC
samples will be collected using dedicated barrel samplers and placed directly into the laboratory-
supplied sample containers.

Non-dedicated sampling equipment will be decontaminated in accordance with the SOP included
in the Generic QAPP. Sample handling and custody will also be in accordance with the approved
Generic QAPP.

List of Sample Collection Equipment
A list of sample collection equipment (including make and model of certain field equipment) to be
used on this particular Brownfields assessment is provided below.

Piedmont Triad Regional Council Kernersville, NC BF-00D72418-0
Site-Specific QAPP Addendum 310 Fisher Ferry Street Thomasville, North Carolina
November 22, 2019 Page 38

\\HHFS01\MasterFiles\AAA-Master Projects\PTRC\PTR002\Thomasville Furniture Plant B Site\Site-Specific QAPP\Revision 1\SSQAPP_Thomasville Plant B_11-22-2019.docx
List of Sample Collection Equipment
Equipment Calibration Method Minimum Calibration Frequency Dedicated or Non-Dedicated
DPT Rig N/A N/A Non-Dedicated
DPT Rods & Tools N/A N/A Non-Dedicated
DPT Macro-Core Sampler N/A N/A Non-Dedicated
Macro-Core Acetate Sleeve N/A N/A Dedicated
Stainless Steel Hand Auger N/A N/A Non-Dedicated
Soil Barrel Sampler N/A N/A Dedicated
AMS Dredger N/A N/A Non-Dedicated
Trimble GeoExplorer 3000 GeoXH Handheld (or similar if not available) N/A N/A Non-Dedicated
PID – MiniRAE Zero air and isobutylene (100 ppm) Prior to use each day Non-Dedicated
Water Level Meter N/A N/A Non-Dedicated
Peristaltic Pump N/A N/A Dedicated sampling tubing
YSI Water Quality Meter Reference Standards
2 times daily or after
every 10 samples. Measurements repeatable to within 0.2 i
Non-Dedicated
Turbidity Meter Reference Standards
2 times daily
(beginning of day and middle of day) Non-Dedicated
Nikon AC-2S Survey Level, Tripod, and Rod Factory Calibrated N/A Non-Dedicated

Piedmont Triad Regional Council Kernersville, NC BF-00D72418-0
Site-Specific QAPP Addendum 310 Fisher Ferry Street Thomasville, North Carolina
November 22, 2019 Page 39

\\HHFS01\MasterFiles\AAA-Master Projects\PTRC\PTR002\Thomasville Furniture Plant B Site\Site-Specific QAPP\Revision 1\SSQAPP_Thomasville Plant B_11-22-2019.docx

On-Site Support Facilities
Potable water and toilet facilities are not available at the Site for field staff. Potable water will be
brought to the Site and toilet facilities at nearby gas stations may be utilized.

Key Personnel Overseeing Sample Collection Activities
The H&H personnel overseeing field activities are Mr. Leonard Moretz (Project Manager), Ms.
Lisa Nickels (Project Coordinator), and the Field Team Leader (staff member to be determined).

Equipment Decontamination Procedures and Requirements
Decontamination procedures and requirements for sample collection equipment to be used during
the Brownfields assessment are described in detail in H&H’s SOPs provided in the Generic QAPP.
As listed in the previous table, both dedicated and non-dedicated sampling equipment will be used
during this Brownfields assessment.

Laboratory Container Requirements
Typical laboratory container requirements are included on Table 2. This table includes the
following information:

• Sample containers (number per sample, size, and type)
• Sample preservation (temperature, chemical, etc.)
• Maximum sample holding times (preparation and analysis)
Piedmont Triad Regional Council Kernersville, NC BF-00D72418-0
Site-Specific QAPP Addendum 310 Fisher Ferry Street Thomasville, North Carolina
November 22, 2019 Page 40

\\HHFS01\MasterFiles\AAA-Master Projects\PTRC\PTR002\Thomasville Furniture Plant B Site\Site-Specific QAPP\Revision 1\SSQAPP_Thomasville Plant B_11-22-2019.docx
B3. Sampling Handling and Custody Requirements

Information regarding sampling handling and custody requirements is included in the Piedmont
Triad Regional Council Generic Quality Assurance Project Plan for Brownfields Site Assessments
dated July 10, 2019. No modifications or additions to these processes as outlined in the approved
Generic QAPP are proposed in this Site-Specific QAPP Addendum.
Piedmont Triad Regional Council Kernersville, NC BF-00D72418-0
Site-Specific QAPP Addendum 310 Fisher Ferry Street Thomasville, North Carolina
November 22, 2019 Page 41

\\HHFS01\MasterFiles\AAA-Master Projects\PTRC\PTR002\Thomasville Furniture Plant B Site\Site-Specific QAPP\Revision 1\SSQAPP_Thomasville Plant B_11-22-2019.docx
B4. Analytical Methods and Requirements

Information regarding analytical methods and requirements is included in Piedmont Triad
Regional Council Generic Quality Assurance Project Plan for Brownfields Site Assessments dated
July 10, 2019. Prism was selected to provide soil and groundwater laboratory analyses for this
project. Analytical methods and requirements have been included in Table 3.

Piedmont Triad Regional Council Kernersville, NC BF-00D72418-0
Site-Specific QAPP Addendum 310 Fisher Ferry Street Thomasville, North Carolina
November 22, 2019 Page 42

\\HHFS01\MasterFiles\AAA-Master Projects\PTRC\PTR002\Thomasville Furniture Plant B Site\Site-Specific QAPP\Revision 1\SSQAPP_Thomasville Plant B_11-22-2019.docx
B5. Field Quality Control Requirements

Information regarding field quality control requirements is included in the Piedmont Triad
Regional Council Generic Quality Assurance Project Plan for Brownfields Site Assessments dated
July 10, 2019.

Field duplicate samples will be collected at a rate of one duplicate for every 20 samples (5%).
Matrix spike/matrix spike duplicate (MS/MSD) samples will be collected at a rate of one MS/MSD
pair for every 20 samples (5%). One laboratory-provided trip blank sample will be included for
every cooler/shipment containing groundwater samples for VOC analysis.

The QA/QC sample requirements are summarized on Table 1. No modifications or additions to
these processes as outlined in the approved Generic QAPP are proposed in this Site-Specific QAPP
Addendum.

Piedmont Triad Regional Council Kernersville, NC BF-00D72418-0
Site-Specific QAPP Addendum 310 Fisher Ferry Street Thomasville, North Carolina
November 22, 2019 Page 43

\\HHFS01\MasterFiles\AAA-Master Projects\PTRC\PTR002\Thomasville Furniture Plant B Site\Site-Specific QAPP\Revision 1\SSQAPP_Thomasville Plant B_11-22-2019.docx
B6. Laboratory Quality Control Requirements

Information regarding laboratory quality control requirements is included in the Piedmont Triad
Regional Council Generic Quality Assurance Project Plan for Brownfields Site Assessments dated
July 10, 2019. Prism was selected to provide soil and groundwater laboratory analyses for this
project. The Prism Quality Assurance Plan (QAP) is provided as an attachment to the approved
Generic QAPP.

QA/QC requirements for specific analyses are included in Table 3. Laboratory data packages will
include project summary, chain-of-custody documentation, laboratory sample receipt information,
and a “Level II” QA/QC package. The Level II package will include method blank analyses,
surrogate recoveries, results of MS/MSD sample analyses with recovery ranges and relative
percent differences, and laboratory control sample analyses with recovery ranges.
Piedmont Triad Regional Council Kernersville, NC BF-00D72418-0
Site-Specific QAPP Addendum 310 Fisher Ferry Street Thomasville, North Carolina
November 22, 2019 Page 44

\\HHFS01\MasterFiles\AAA-Master Projects\PTRC\PTR002\Thomasville Furniture Plant B Site\Site-Specific QAPP\Revision 1\SSQAPP_Thomasville Plant B_11-22-2019.docx
B7. Field Equipment & Corrective Action

Information regarding field equipment and corrective action is included in the Piedmont Triad
Regional Council Generic Quality Assurance Project Plan for Brownfields Site Assessments dated
July 10, 2019. The specific sample collection equipment to be utilized during this field effort were
tabulated and discussed in Section B2 of this Site-Specific QAPP Addendum. No modifications
or additions to the general processes as outlined in the approved Generic QAPP are proposed in
this Site-Specific QAPP Addendum.

Piedmont Triad Regional Council Kernersville, NC BF-00D72418-0
Site-Specific QAPP Addendum 310 Fisher Ferry Street Thomasville, North Carolina
November 22, 2019 Page 45

\\HHFS01\MasterFiles\AAA-Master Projects\PTRC\PTR002\Thomasville Furniture Plant B Site\Site-Specific QAPP\Revision 1\SSQAPP_Thomasville Plant B_11-22-2019.docx
B8. Lab Equipment & Corrective Action

General information regarding lab equipment and corrective action is included in the Piedmont
Triad Regional Council Generic Quality Assurance Project Plan for Brownfields Site Assessments
dated July 10, 2019. Prism was selected to provide soil and groundwater laboratory analyses for
this project. Laboratory corrective actions when control limits are not met are specified in Section
13.0 of Prism’s QAP. Control limits are presented in Section 13.1 of Prism’s QAP.

Piedmont Triad Regional Council Kernersville, NC BF-00D72418-0
Site-Specific QAPP Addendum 310 Fisher Ferry Street Thomasville, North Carolina
November 22, 2019 Page 46

\\HHFS01\MasterFiles\AAA-Master Projects\PTRC\PTR002\Thomasville Furniture Plant B Site\Site-Specific QAPP\Revision 1\SSQAPP_Thomasville Plant B_11-22-2019.docx
B9. Analytical Sensitivity & Project Criteria

Information regarding analytical sensitivity and project criteria is included in the Piedmont Triad
Regional Council Generic Quality Assurance Project Plan for Brownfields Site Assessments dated
July 10, 2019. Prism was selected to provide soil and groundwater laboratory analyses for this
project.

Analytical sensitivity and project criteria requirements for analyses are presented in Table 4.
QA/QC requirements for these analyses are presented in Table 3.
Piedmont Triad Regional Council Kernersville, NC BF-00D72418-0
Site-Specific QAPP Addendum 310 Fisher Ferry Street Thomasville, North Carolina
November 22, 2019 Page 47

\\HHFS01\MasterFiles\AAA-Master Projects\PTRC\PTR002\Thomasville Furniture Plant B Site\Site-Specific QAPP\Revision 1\SSQAPP_Thomasville Plant B_11-22-2019.docx
B10. Data Management and Documents

Information regarding data management and documents is included in the Piedmont Triad
Regional Council Generic Quality Assurance Project Plan for Brownfields Site Assessments dated
July 10, 2019. No modifications or additions to these processes as outlined in the approved
Generic QAPP are proposed in this Site-Specific QAPP Addendum.
Piedmont Triad Regional Council Kernersville, NC BF-00D72418-0
Site-Specific QAPP Addendum 310 Fisher Ferry Street Thomasville, North Carolina
November 22, 2019 Page 48

\\HHFS01\MasterFiles\AAA-Master Projects\PTRC\PTR002\Thomasville Furniture Plant B Site\Site-Specific QAPP\Revision 1\SSQAPP_Thomasville Plant B_11-22-2019.docx
C1. Assessment and Response Actions

Information regarding assessments and response actions is included in the Piedmont Triad
Regional Council Generic Quality Assurance Project Plan for Brownfields Site Assessments dated
July 10, 2019. No modifications or additions to these processes as outlined in the approved
Generic QAPP are proposed in this Site-Specific QAPP Addendum.
Piedmont Triad Regional Council Kernersville, NC BF-00D72418-0
Site-Specific QAPP Addendum 310 Fisher Ferry Street Thomasville, North Carolina
November 22, 2019 Page 49

\\HHFS01\MasterFiles\AAA-Master Projects\PTRC\PTR002\Thomasville Furniture Plant B Site\Site-Specific QAPP\Revision 1\SSQAPP_Thomasville Plant B_11-22-2019.docx
C2. Project Reports

Information regarding project reports is included in the Piedmont Triad Regional Council Generic
Quality Assurance Project Plan for Brownfields Site Assessments dated July 10, 2019. A
Brownfields Assessment Report will be prepared that will include the results of the soil and
groundwater analytical results in comparison to regulatory levels, results of the receptor survey, a
brief description of the Site geology, boring logs, summary tables, figures depicting sample
locations, and conclusions and recommendations concerning our activities.

No additional modifications or additions to these processes as outlined in the Generic QAPP are
proposed in this Site-Specific QAPP Addendum.
Piedmont Triad Regional Council Kernersville, NC BF-00D72418-0
Site-Specific QAPP Addendum 310 Fisher Ferry Street Thomasville, North Carolina
November 22, 2019 Page 50

\\HHFS01\MasterFiles\AAA-Master Projects\PTRC\PTR002\Thomasville Furniture Plant B Site\Site-Specific QAPP\Revision 1\SSQAPP_Thomasville Plant B_11-22-2019.docx
D1. Field Data Evaluation

Project Task Performance Review
At the end of the field event, H&H’s Project Manager or his designee will review the field logbooks
used by project personnel to 1) evaluate important information that may significantly impact the
project or assist in the interpretation of the lab data and the conceptual Site model, and 2) check
that tasks were performed as specified in the SSQAPP Addendum. Any significant findings (i.e.,
observations, trends, conclusions, limitations, etc.) of this field data review process will be
documented in the final report. H&H will also document in the final report any missing data,
unresolved questions, non-compliant issues, and variations from the SSQAPP Addendum.

Specific items to be reviewed include:

• Samples collected in proper locations
• Field equipment calibration procedures documented in field book and in accordance with acceptance criteria
• Proper sampling techniques used
• Field QA/QC requirements followed
• Samples analyzed for correct parameters
Data Quality Review
Field data will be reviewed and verified to ensure that the data collected are of sufficient quantity
and quality to support the project-specific DQOs. Raw data and data-entry errors will be detected
by standard QA review consisting of 1) an initial review by the technician generating the data; and
2) a second review by the H&H’s Project Manager or his/her senior level designee. Reduced data
will be checked in the same manner by manual calculations on a spot-check basis in a like manner.
Equations, calculations, data transfers, consistent units, and significant figures will be subject to
the quality assurance review. Results of the above field data quality review will be documented
in the final report.

Piedmont Triad Regional Council Kernersville, NC BF-00D72418-0
Site-Specific QAPP Addendum 310 Fisher Ferry Street Thomasville, North Carolina
November 22, 2019 Page 51

\\HHFS01\MasterFiles\AAA-Master Projects\PTRC\PTR002\Thomasville Furniture Plant B Site\Site-Specific QAPP\Revision 1\SSQAPP_Thomasville Plant B_11-22-2019.docx
Data Validation
H&H’s QA Manager, who is independent from the project sampling team and is not affiliated with
the analytical laboratory, will review the final draft report for completeness and compliance with
overall project goals. The QA Manager will review and evaluate field and laboratory QC data to
determine what data are judged to be valid for use as intended, and what data must be used with
qualifications or eliminated altogether (see Section D3). The QA Manager will communicate the
deficiencies to H&H’s Project Manager. These determinations will be documented fully in the
assessment report and associated remediation planning documents.

Acceptance Criteria
An acceptance criteria analysis of field QA/QC samples (i.e., field duplicates, trip blanks, and
equipment blanks) will be performed by H&H’s QA Manager using professional judgment and
the procedures described below. If the analysis suggests some or all samples should be recollected,
H&H will notify the USEPA Project Officer.

1. Field duplicate samples – precision through the relative percent difference (RPD) between
the sample and field duplicate will be calculated according to the following:

Absolute value of the difference of the sample and field duplicate results RPD = x 100% Average of the sample and field duplicate results
An RPD of <35% is acceptable, between 35% and 50% is slightly high, and >50% is
considered high.

2. Trip and equipment blanks – representativeness is a parameter that evaluates how
accurately the data represent actual environmental conditions. The primary evaluation
criterion for trip and equipment blanks is that no constituents should be detected at
concentrations above the laboratory reporting limit. If constituents are detected, then the
associated sample results will be reviewed to determine whether or not there is an inherent
variability in the data or if the constituent detection is an isolated occurrence not affecting
Piedmont Triad Regional Council Kernersville, NC BF-00D72418-0
Site-Specific QAPP Addendum 310 Fisher Ferry Street Thomasville, North Carolina
November 22, 2019 Page 52

\\HHFS01\MasterFiles\AAA-Master Projects\PTRC\PTR002\Thomasville Furniture Plant B Site\Site-Specific QAPP\Revision 1\SSQAPP_Thomasville Plant B_11-22-2019.docx
other data. Associated sample data will be qualified when there are constituent detections
in blank samples. If constituents are detected in the blank sample but not the associated
sample, no additional actions will be required.

Professional judgment will be exercised by the H&H QA Manager to determine the
usability of the associated sample data. Actions regarding detections in blank samples
depend on the circumstances and origin of the blanks. At a minimum, positive blank
sample results will be documented. Specific actions may include, but are not limited to:

• Determining if the blank constituent is a typical laboratory artifact (i.e., acetone,
methylene chloride, 2-butanone, cyclohexane, etc.)
• Confirming results with the analytical laboratory and potentially requesting
reanalysis
• Evaluating relative contaminant concentrations between blanks and associated
samples
• Reviewing field sampling/decontamination procedures and making adjustments, if
necessary
• Recollecting samples

Piedmont Triad Regional Council Kernersville, NC BF-00D72418-0
Site-Specific QAPP Addendum 310 Fisher Ferry Street Thomasville, North Carolina
November 22, 2019 Page 53

\\HHFS01\MasterFiles\AAA-Master Projects\PTRC\PTR002\Thomasville Furniture Plant B Site\Site-Specific QAPP\Revision 1\SSQAPP_Thomasville Plant B_11-22-2019.docx
D2. Laboratory Data Evaluation

Information regarding laboratory data evaluation is included in the Piedmont Triad Regional
Council Generic Quality Assurance Project Plan for Brownfields Site Assessments dated July 10,
2019. Prism was selected to provide soil and groundwater laboratory analyses for this project. No
modifications or additions to these processes as outlined in the Generic QAPP are proposed in this
Site-Specific QAPP Addendum.

Piedmont Triad Regional Council Kernersville, NC BF-00D72418-0
Site-Specific QAPP Addendum 310 Fisher Ferry Street Thomasville, North Carolina
November 22, 2019 Page 54

\\HHFS01\MasterFiles\AAA-Master Projects\PTRC\PTR002\Thomasville Furniture Plant B Site\Site-Specific QAPP\Revision 1\SSQAPP_Thomasville Plant B_11-22-2019.docx
D3. Data Usability and Project Evaluation

Data review efforts described in this SSQAPP Addendum will culminate in a determination of
what data are judged to be valid for use as intended, and what data must be used with qualifications
or eliminated altogether. These determinations will be documented fully in the assessment report
and associated remediation planning documents.

An overall project evaluation process is presented below that will be routinely used to determine
data usability, update the conceptual Site model, and to determine if the project objectives have
been met. The basic steps of this process include:

1) Compare Sample Data with State/Federal Standards
Tabulate the sample data together with the applicable state/federal standards, regulatory
screening levels and/or background concentrations for presentation in the final report.
Highlight any sample results exceeding the criteria. Check the table for completeness,
correctness, and accuracy.

2) Prepare Site Figures/Maps and Other Graphical Representations
Generate figures and maps as appropriate to show geologic and hydrogeologic conditions
and the distribution of contaminants with respect to Site features. Check the figures for
completeness, correctness, and accuracy.

3) Evaluate Usability
Using the summary table in Step 1 and the graphical presentations in Step 2, evaluate the
usability of the individual field sample results at the parameter level. Document any
limitations on how the data should be used and/or interpreted. Consider the following
criteria

• Sensitivity (is sample concentration near the reporting limit or method detection
limit?)
Piedmont Triad Regional Council Kernersville, NC BF-00D72418-0
Site-Specific QAPP Addendum 310 Fisher Ferry Street Thomasville, North Carolina
November 22, 2019 Page 55

\\HHFS01\MasterFiles\AAA-Master Projects\PTRC\PTR002\Thomasville Furniture Plant B Site\Site-Specific QAPP\Revision 1\SSQAPP_Thomasville Plant B_11-22-2019.docx
• Results of field data evaluation (see Section D1)
• Results of laboratory data evaluation (see Section D2)

Evaluate the following potential data quality issues:

Where contaminants of concern are detected at concentrations near the project criteria and
reporting limits:
Are there sufficient surrounding data points to support a trend of real Site contamination? Is more
data needed to support a conclusion?

Evaluate the heterogeneity of a particular matrix by evaluating the field duplicate results:
Variability in the duplicate results can impact the usability of low level results near the project
criteria. Are more data points needed to support a conclusion?

Evaluate sample results that are reported at elevated reporting limits due to dilution of the sample
during analyses:
Is the usability of the data compromised because the reporting limit is greater than the project
criteria? Can sample cleanup and re-analysis be performed to salvage the data?

Evaluate data suitability for the project when screening level analytical methods are used:
Do the field or laboratory data indicate the potential for contaminants below the detection limits
of the method? Should more sophisticated methods with lower detection limits be used?

Evaluate low flow groundwater quality data:
Does the turbidity data impact the use of the SVOC or metals data where the concentration is near
the project criteria and reporting limits?

Based upon the data usability evaluation described in Step 3 above, H&H’s Project Manager will
perform an overall project evaluation and will document observations, trends, anomalies, or data
gaps that may exist. Further, H&H’s Project Manager will evaluate how the sample results impact
Piedmont Triad Regional Council Kernersville, NC BF-00D72418-0
Site-Specific QAPP Addendum 310 Fisher Ferry Street Thomasville, North Carolina
November 22, 2019 Page 56

\\HHFS01\MasterFiles\AAA-Master Projects\PTRC\PTR002\Thomasville Furniture Plant B Site\Site-Specific QAPP\Revision 1\SSQAPP_Thomasville Plant B_11-22-2019.docx
the conceptual Site model and whether the project objectives have been met. The above
evaluations, observations, and conclusions will be documented in the final report.

Tables
Table 1 (1 of 2)
Sample Summary Table
Thomasville Plant B
310 Fisher Ferry Street
Thomasville, North Carolina
H&H Job No. PTR-002
VOCs SVOCs RCRA Metals + Cr(VI) (soil & sediment only)3 Hardness
EPA 8260B EPA 8270D EPA 6020/7470/7471/7199 Standard Method 2430B
SB-1 0-2 AOC-7 X X X
SB-2 0-2 AOC-2 X X X
SB-3 0-2 AOC-8 X X X
SB-4 0-2 AOC-6 X X X
SB-5*0-2 X X X
SB-6*0-2 X X X
SB-7*0-2 X X X
SB-8*0-2 X X X
SB-9*0-2 In the area surrounding the former 10,000-gallon water tower.X X X
SB-10*0-2 AOC-13 X X X
SB-11 0-2 X X X
SB-12 0-2 X X X
SB-13 0-2 X X X
SB-14 0-2 X X X
SB-15 0-2 X X X
SB-16 0-2 X X X
SB-17**TBD X X X
SB-18**TBD X X X
SB-19**TBD X X X
SB-20**TBD X X X
SB-21**TBD X X X
SB-22**TBD X X X
BG-1 0-2 X
BG-2 0-2 X
Field Duplicate (5%)--X X X
MS/MSD (5%)--X X X
TMW-1 --AOC-4 X X X
TMW-2 --AOC-13 X X X
TMW-3 --AOC-3 X X X
TMW-4 --AOC-7 X X X
TMW-5 --X X X
TMW-6 --X X X
Field Duplicate (5%)--X X X
MS/MSD (5%)--X X X
Trip Blank2 --X
AOC-3, AOC-4, AOC-7, and AOC-13
Background
QA/QC
Groundwater Samples
QA/QC
Sample ID Sample Depth
(ft bgs)Sample Objective
Soil Samples
Analyses
AOC-13
AOC-4
S:\AAA-Master Projects\PTRC\PTR002\Thomasville Furniture Plant B Site\Site-Specific QAPP\Tables\Tables11/22/2019
Table 1 (1 of 2)
Hart & Hickman, PC
Table 1 (2 of 2)
Sample Summary Table
Thomasville Plant B
310 Fisher Ferry Street
Thomasville, North Carolina
H&H Job No. PTR-002
VOCs SVOCs RCRA Metals + Cr(VI) (soil & sediment only)3 Hardness
EPA 8260B EPA 8270D EPA 6020/7470/7471/7199 Standard Method 2430B
Sample ID Sample Depth
(ft bgs)Sample Objective

Analyses
SW-1 --Where North Hamby Creek exits the Site on the western property
boundary.X X X X
SW-2 --AOC-6 X X X X
SW-3 --AOC-5 X X X X
SW-4 --Where North Hamby Creek enters the Site on the eastern
property boundary.X X X X
Field Duplicate (5%)--X X X X
MS/MSD (5%)--X X X X
Trip Blank2 --X
SED-1 --Where North Hamby Creek exits the Site on the western property
boundary.X X X
SED-2 --AOC-6 X X X
SED-3 --AOC-5 X X X
SED-4 --Where North Hamby Creek enters the Site on the eastern
property boundary.X X X
Field Duplicate (5%)--X X X
MS/MSD (5%)--X X X
46 44 46 6
Notes:
2) One trip blank will be included with each shipment containing groundwater samples for VOC analysis.
3) Sample for hexavalent chromium will be collected and put on hold for potential analysis by EPA Method 7199. H&H will direct the laboratory to hold the hexavalent chromium analyses pending the results of the total chromium analyses.
VOCs = volatile organic compounds; SVOCs = semi-volatile organic compounds; RCRA = Resource Conservation and Recovery Act; MS/MSD = matrix spike/matrix spike duplicate; QA/QC = quality assurance/quality control; SB = soil
boring; BG = background; TW = temporary monitoring well; ft bgs = feet below ground surface; TBD = to be determined; * = composite soil sample ; **= monitoring well soil sample based on field screening criteria
1) Continuous samples will be collected from two-foot intervals and field screened with a calibrated photoionization detector (PID). All soil samples will be collected from the 0-2 ft bgs interval unless evidence of impacts are noted (high PID
readings, staining, and/or petroleum/solvent odors).
Surface Water Samples
Sediment Samples
POTENTIAL TOTAL SOIL, GROUNDWATER, AND QA/QC SAMPLES
QA/QC
QA/QC
S:\AAA-Master Projects\PTRC\PTR002\Thomasville Furniture Plant B Site\Site-Specific QAPP\Tables\Tables11/22/2019
Table 1 (2 of 2)
Hart & Hickman, PC
Table 2 (1 of 1)
Sampling and Analytical Method Requirements
Thomasville Plant B
310 Fisher Ferry Street
Thomasville, North Carolina
H&H Job No. PTR-002
Sample Analysis Holding Time Preservation Procedures Container Type
VOCs by EPA 8260 14 days Cool, <6°C, 5 mL 20%
NaHSO4
(3) 40 mL glass vial, 4 oz glass
SVOCs by EPA 8270 14 days until extraction,
40 days after extraction Cool, <6°C 8 oz glass
RCRA Metals by EPA
6020/7471/7199
180 days; Cr(VI) and Hg -
28 days Cool, <6°C 4 oz glass
VOCs by EPA 8260 14 days Cool, <6°C; HCl to pH <2 (3) 40 mL glass vial
SVOCs by EPA 8270 7 days until extraction,
40 days after extraction Cool, <6°C (2) 1000 mL amber
glass
RCRA Metals by EPA 6020 180 days; Hg - 28 days Cool, <6°C; HNO3 to pH <2 500 mL plastic
Hardness by SM 2430C 180 days Cool, HNO3 to pH <2 100 mL plastic
Temperature, pH, Conductivity, Turbidity Immediately after sample collected Not Applicable Not Applicable
Notes:
VOCs = volatile organic compoundsSVOCs = semi-volatile organic compounds
RCRA = Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
Soil/Sediment Samples
Groundwater/Surface Water Samples
S:\AAA-Master Projects\PTRC\PTR002\Thomasville Furniture Plant B Site\Site-Specific QAPP\Tables
10/7/2019
Table 2 (1 of 1)
Hart & Hickman, PC
Table 3 (Page 1 of 7)
Laboratory Analytical Quality Control
Thomasville Plant B
310 Fisher Ferry Street
Thomasville, North Carolina
H&H Job No. PTR-002
MS Percent
Recovery
MSD RPD
Percent
Method Blank
Acceptance
Limit
Laboratory
Control Percent
Recovery
VOCs (soil & sediment only)µg/kg µg/kg
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethene 8260 5030 0.61 5 60 -120 15 ≤1/2 RL 72-115
1,1,1-Trichloroethane 8260 5030 0.74 5 52 -139 21 ≤1/2 RL 67 -131
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethene 8260 5030 0.36 5 39 -135 22 ≤1/2 RL 56 -126
1,1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-Trifluoroethane 8260 5030 0.87 10 70 -130*20*≤1/2 RL 70 -130*
1,1,2-Trichloroethane 8260 5030 0.54 5 44 -140 21 ≤1/2 RL 70 -133
1,1-Dichloroethane 8260 5030 0.90 5 59 -137 21 ≤1/2 RL 74 -127
1,1-Dichloroethene 8260 5030 0.92 5 54 -162 22 ≤1/2 RL 67 -149
1,1-Dichloropropene 8260 5030 0.77 5 55 -137 19 ≤1/2 RL 71 -130
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene 8260 5030 0.72 10 34 -120 41 ≤1/2 RL 68 -130
1,2,3-Trichloropropane 8260 5030 0.57 5 45 -139 25 ≤1/2 RL 60 -137
1,2.4-Trichlorobenzene 8260 5030 0.48 10 35 -116 62 ≤1/2 RL 66 -125
1,2.4-Trimethylbenzene 8260 5030 0.53 10 38 -142 24 ≤1/2 RL 69 -129
1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane 8260 5030 0.6 5 27 -132 25 ≤1/2 RL 55 -157
1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)8260 5030 0.45 5 49 -132 15 ≤1/2 RL 70 -132
1,2-Dichlorobenzene 8260 5030 0.56 5 42 -130 21 ≤1/2 RL 72 -123
1,2-Dichloroethane 8260 5030 0.60 5 51 -131 13 ≤1/2 RL 68 -128
1,2-Dichloropropane 8260 5030 0.75 5 55 -138 16 ≤1/2 RL 73 -130
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 8260 5030 0.63 5 44 -140 29 ≤1/2 RL 69 -128
1,3-Dichlorobenzene 8260 5030 0.62 5 41 -129 24 ≤1/2 RL 71 -120
1,3-Dichloropropane 8260 5030 0.42 5 53 -129 15 ≤1/2 RL 75 -124
1,4-Dichlorobenzene 8260 5030 0.63 5 44 -134 21 ≤1/2 RL 71 -123
1.4-Dichlorobutane 8260 5030 0.50 10 70 -130*20*≤1/2 RL 70 -130*
1,4-Dioxane 8260 5030 0 3 70 -130*20*≤1/2 RL 70 -130*
2,2-Dichloropropane 8260 5030 0.62 5 30 -147 20 ≤1/2 RL 50 -142
2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether 8260 5030 0.7 10 69 -124 15 ≤1/2 RL 72 -126
2-Chlorotoluene 8260 5030 0.67 5 46 -132 29 ≤1/2 RL 67 -124
2-Methyltetrahydrofuran 8260 5030 1.00 10 70 130 20 ≤1/2 RL 70 130
4-Chlorotoluene 8260 5030 0.57 5 44 -135 23 ≤1/2 RL 71 -126
4-lsopropyltoluene 8260 5030 0.4 15 32 -144 22 ≤1/2 RL 68 -129
Acetone 8260 5030 1.3 20 34 -143 49 ≤1/2 RL 29 -198
Acrolein 8260 5030 0.9 20 70 -130*20*≤1/2 RL 70 -130*
Acrylonitrile 8260 5030 1.00 20 51 -105 30 ≤1/2 RL 81 -107
Benzene 8260 5030 0.78 5 60 -135 20 ≤1/2 RL 74 -127
Bromobenzene 8260 5030 0.69 5 45 -135 25 ≤1/2 RL 73 -125
Bromochloromethane 8260 5030 0.82 5 55 -136 18 ≤1/2 RL 72 -134
Bromodichloromethane 8260 5030 0.47 5 55 -136 17 ≤1/2 RL 75 -122
Bromoform 8260 5030 0.4 5 40 -136 35 ≤1/2 RL 66 -135
Bromomethane 8260 5030 2.40 10 30 -137 30 ≤1/2 RL 20 -180
Carbon Disulfide 8260 5030 0.86 5 49 -139 26 ≤1/2 RL 61 -129
Carbon Tetrachloride 8260 5030 0.98 5 48 -153 23 ≤1/2 RL 64 -143
Chlorobenzene 8260 5030 0.8 5 57 -125 14 ≤1/2 RL 74 -118
Chloroethane 8260 5030 0.95 10 16 -177 47 ≤1/2 RL 33 -149
Chloroform 8260 5030 0.6 5 56 -137 18 ≤1/2 RL 73 -127
Chloromethane 8260 5030 1.50 10 40 -145 26 ≤1/2 RL 45 -143
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 8260 5030 0.79 5 58 -140 28 ≤1/2 RL 76 -134
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 8260 5030 0.5 5 42 -135 32 ≤1/2 RL 71 -125
Cyclohexane 8260 5030 0.61 5 70 -130*20*≤1/2 RL 70 -130*
Dibromochloromethane 8260 5030 0.34 5 49 -127 24 ≤1/2 RL 73 -122
Dibromomethane 8260 5030 0.56 5 59 -133 15 ≤1/2 RL 74 -133
Dichlorodifluoromethane 8260 5030 1.40 10 25 -151 37 ≤1/2 RL 26 -146
Ethanol 8260 5030 18.00 250 70 -130*20*≤1/2 RL 70 -130*
Ethyl tert-Butyl ether 8260 5030 1.70 100 70 -130*20 ≤1/2 RL 70 -130*
Ethylbenzene 8260 5030 0.75 5 44 -144 19 ≤1/2 RL 74 -128
Hexachlorobutadiene 8260 5030 0.82 10 30 -126 26 ≤1/2 RL 64 -125
Hexane 8260 5030 0.59 10 70 -130*20*≤1/2 RL 70 -130*
lsopropyl ether (IPE)8260 5030 0.73 5 51 -155 13 ≤1/2 RL 59 -159
lsopropylbenzene 8260 5030 0.6 5 41 -140 27 ≤1/2 RL 68 -126
m,p-Xylenes 8260 5030 1.30 10 36 -148 20 ≤1/2 RL 75 -124
Methyl Acetate 8260 5030 0.5 5 70 -130*20*≤1/2 RL 70 -130*
Methyl Butyl Ketone (2-Hexanone)8260 5030 0,34 20 30 -147 42 ≤1/2 RL 61 -157
Methylcyclohexane 8260 5030 0.3 5 70 -130*20 ≤1/2 RL 70 -130*
Methyl ethyl ketone (MEK)8260 5030 1.20 20 24 -160 42 ≤1/2 RL 63 -149
Methyl iodide 8260 5030 1.90 10 70 -130*20 ≤1/2 RL 70 -130*
Methyl lsobutyl Ketone (MIBK)8260 5030 0.41 20 25 -163 44 ≤1/2 RL 57 -162
Methylene Chloride 8260 5030 0.81 5 53 -144 14 ≤1/2 RL 74 -129
Methyl-tert-butyl ether {MTBE)8260 5030 0.70 5 49 -135 22 ≤1/2 RL 70 -130
Naphthalene 8260 5030 0.50 10 32 -127 44 ≤1/2 RL 57 -157
n-Butylbenzene 8260 5030 0.47 5 23 -148 39 ≤1/2 RL 65 -135
n-Propylbenzene 8260 5030 0.72 5 35 -144 27 ≤1/2 RL 67 -130
o-Xylene 8260 5030 0.53 5 43 -143 17 ≤1/2 RL 74 -126
sec-Butylbenzene 8260 5030 0.54 5 34 -144 28 ≤1/2 RL 66 -131
Styrene 8260 5030 0.48 5 42 -132 28 ≤1/2 RL 77 -121
tert-Amyl Alcohol 8260 5030 32.00 400 70 -130*20*≤1/2 RL 70 -130*
tert-Amyl Methyl Ether 8260 5030 7.30 100 70 -130*20*≤1/2 RL 70 -130*
tert-Butyl Alcohol 8260 5030 1.30 200 70 -130*20*≤1/2 RL 70 -130*
tert-Butyl Formate 8260 5030 17.00 400 70 -130*20*≤1/2 RL 70 -130*
Primary Compounds of Concern Analytical
Method
Extraction/
Digestion
Method
Method
Detection
Limit
Reporting
Limit
QA/QC Requirements
S:\AAA-Master Projects\PTRC\PTR002\Thomasville Furniture Plant B Site\Site-Specific QAPP\Tables
10/7/2019
Table 3 (Page 1 of 7)
Hart & Hickman, PC
Table 3 (Page 2 of 7)
Laboratory Analytical Quality Control
Thomasville Plant B
310 Fisher Ferry Street
Thomasville, North Carolina
H&H Job No. PTR-002
MS Percent
Recovery
MSD RPD
Percent
Method Blank
Acceptance
Limit
Laboratory
Control Percent
Recovery
Primary Compounds of Concern Analytical
Method
Extraction/
Digestion
Method
Method
Detection
Limit
Reporting
Limit
QA/QC Requirements
VOCs (soil & sediment only)µg/kg µg/kg
tert-Butylbenzene 8260 5030 0.59 5 36 -150 29 ≤1/2 RL 67 -132
Tetrachloroethene 8260 5030 0.90 5 47 -142 26 ≤1/2 RL 68 -130
Tetrahydrofuran 8260 5030 0.4 5 70 -130*20*≤1/2 RL 70 -130*
Toluene 8260 5030 0.80 5 57 -135 22 ≤1/2 RL 71 -129
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 8260 5030 0.96 5 58 -141 18 ≤1/2 RL 73 -132
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 8260 5030 0.43 5 41 -124 20 ≤1/2 RL 68 -123
trans-1,4-Dichloro-2-butene 8260 5030 0.58 10 70 -130*20*≤1/2 RL 70 -130*
Trichloroethene 8260 5030 0.97 5 38 -164 18 ≤1/2 RL 75 -133
Trichlorofluoromethane 8260 5030 1.30 10 30 -157 27 ≤1/2 RL 44 -146
Vinyl acetate 8260 5030 0.54 10 61 -154 35 ≤1/2 RL 85 -161
Vinyl Chloride 8260 5030 0.99 10 40 -156 35 ≤1/2 RL 48 -147
Xylenes, total 8260 5030 1.80 15 36 -148 20 ≤1/2 RL 74 -126
SVOCs (soil & sediment only)µg/kg µg/kg
1,1-Biphenyl 8270E 3550 89 330 40 -117 20 ≤1/2 RL 40 -117
1-Methylhaphthalene 8270E 3550 140 660 40 -119 20 ≤1/2 RL 40 -119
1-Methylphenanthrene 8270E 3550 28 330 45 -125 20 ≤1/2 RL 45 -125
1,2,4,5-Tetrachlorobenzene 8270E 3550 110 330 37 -119 20 ≤1/2 RL 37 -119
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 8270E 3550 117 660 34 -118 20 ≤1/2 RL 34 -118
1,2-Dichlorobenzene 8270E 3550 107 660 33 -117 20 ≤1/2 RL 33 -117
1,3-Dichlorobenzene 8270E 3550 97 660 30 -115 20 ≤1/2 RL 30 -115
1,4-Dichlorobenzene 8270E 3550 104 330 31 -115 20 ≤1/2 RL 31 -115
2,3-Dichloroaniline 8270E 3550 154 500 45 -125 20 ≤1/2 RL 45 -125
2,3,4,6-Tetrachlorophenol 8270E 3550 195 500 44 -125 20 ≤1/2 RL 44 -125
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol 8270E 3550 140 660 41 -124 20 ≤1/2 RL 41 -124
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol 8270E 3550 160 660 39 -126 20 ≤1/2 RL 39 -126
2,4-Dichlorophenol 8270E 3550 129 660 40 -122 20 ≤1/2 RL 40 -122
2,4-Dimethylphenol 8270E 3550 137 330 30 -127 20 ≤1/2 RL 30 -127
2,4-Dinitrophenol 8270E 3550 387 1500 27 -129 20 ≤1/2 RL 27 -129
2,4-Dinitrotoluene 8270E 3550 175 660 48 -126 20 ≤1/2 RL 48 -126
2,6-Dinitrotoluene 8270E 3550 171.0 660 46 -124 20 ≤1/2 RL 46 -124
2-Chloronaphthalene 8270E 3550 161 660 41 -114 20 ≤1/2 RL 41 -114
2-Chlorophenol 8270E 3550 126 660 34 -121 20 ≤1/2 RL 34 -121
2-Methylnaphthalene 8270E 3550 128 660 38 -122 20 ≤1/2 RL 38 -122
2-Methylphenol 8270E 3550 126 660 32 -122 20 ≤1/2 RL 32 -122
2-Nitroaniline 8270E 3550 142 660 44 -127 20 ≤1/2 RL 44 -127
2-Nitrophenol 8270E 3550 110 660 36 -123 20 ≤1/2 RL 36 -123
3&4-Methylphenol 8270E 3550 143 660 34 -119 20 ≤1/2 RL 34 -119
3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine 8270E 3550 131 660 22 -121 20 ≤1/2 RL 22 -121
3-Nitroaniline 8270E 3550 125 660 33 -119 20 ≤1/2 RL 33 -119
3,4-Dimethylphenol 8270E 3550 78 330 35 -115 20 ≤1/2 RL 35 -115
4,6-Dinitro-2-methyl phenol 8270E 3550 364 1500 29 -132 20 ≤1/2 RL 29 -132
4-Bromophenyl-phenyl ether 8270E 3550 155 660 46 -124 20 ≤1/2 RL 46 -124
4-Chloro-3-Methylphenol 8270E 3550 126 660 45 -122 20 ≤1/2 RL 45 -122
4-Chloroaniline 8270E 3550 78 330 17 -106 20 ≤1/2 RL 17 -106
4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether 8270E 3550 202 1000 45 -121 20 ≤1/2 RL 45 -121
4-Nitroaniline 8270E 3550 103 330 63 -147 20 ≤1/2 RL 63 -147
4-Nitrophenol 8270E 3550 163 660 30 -132 20 ≤1/2 RL 30 -132
Acenaphthene 8270E 3550 159 660 40 -123 20 ≤1/2 RL 40 -123
Acenaphthylene 8270E 3550 178 660 32 -132 20 ≤1/2 RL 32 -132
Acetaphenone 8270E 3550 174 660 33 -115 20 ≤1/2 RL 33 -115
Aniline 8270E 3550 163 660 12 -197 20 ≤1/2 RL 12 -197
Anthracene 8270E 3550 179 660 47 -123 20 ≤1/2 RL 47 -123
Atrazine 8270E 3550 81 330 47 -127 20 ≤1/2 RL 47 -127
Azobenzene 8270E 3550 141 660 39 -125 20 ≤1/2 RL 39 -125
a-Terpineol 8270E 3550 22 330 45 -125 20 ≤1/2 RL 45 -125
Benzaldehyde 8270E 3550 57 330 35 -115 20 ≤1/2 RL 35 -115
Benzidine 8270E 3550 38 330 45 -135 20 ≤1/2 RL 45 -135
Benzo (a) anthracene 8270E 3550 141 660 49 -126 20 ≤1/2 RL 49 -126
Benzo (a) pyrene 8270E 3550 147 660 45 -129 20 ≤1/2 RL 45 -129
Benzo (b) fluoranthene 8270E 3550 154 660 45 -132 20 ≤1/2 RL 45 -132
Benzo (b/k) fluoranthene 8270E 3550 33 330 45 -132 20 ≤1/2 RL 45 -132
Benzo (g,h,1) perylene 8270E 3550 128 660 43 -134 20 ≤1/2 RL 43 -134
Benzo (k) fluoranthene 8270E 3550 144 660 47 -132 20 ≤1/2 RL 47 -132
Benzoic acid 8270E 3550 548 2000 10 -83 20 ≤1/2 RL 10 -83
Benzyl Alcohol 8270E 3550 124 660 29 -122 20 ≤1/2 RL 29 -122
Bis(2-chloroethoxy) methane 8270E 3550 136 660 36 -121 20 ≤1/2 RL 36 -121
Bis(2-chloroethyl) ether 8270E 3550 106 660 31 -120 20 ≤1/2 RL 31 -120
Bis(2-chloroisopropyl) ether 8270E 3550 118 330 33 -131 20 ≤1/2 RL 33 -131
Bis(2-Ethylhexyl) phthalate 8270E 3550 149 660 51 -133 20 ≤1/2 RL 51 -133
Butyl benzyl phthalate 8270E 3550 114 330 48 -132 20 ≤1/2 RL 48 -132
Caprolactam 8270E 3550 123 330 46 -117 20 ≤1/2 RL 46 -117
Carbazole 8270E 3550 152 660 50 -123 20 ≤1/2 RL 50 -123
Chrysene 8270E 3550 145 660 50 -124 20 ≤1/2 RL 50 -124
Dibenzo (a,h) anthracene 8270E 3550 190 660 45 -134 20 ≤1/2 RL 45 -134
Dibenzofuran 8270E 3550 178 660 44 -120 20 ≤1/2 RL 44 -120
S:\AAA-Master Projects\PTRC\PTR002\Thomasville Furniture Plant B Site\Site-Specific QAPP\Tables
10/7/2019
Table 3 (Page 2 of 7)
Hart & Hickman, PC
Table 3 (Page 3 of 7)
Laboratory Analytical Quality Control
Thomasville Plant B
310 Fisher Ferry Street
Thomasville, North Carolina
H&H Job No. PTR-002
MS Percent
Recovery
MSD RPD
Percent
Method Blank
Acceptance
Limit
Laboratory
Control Percent
Recovery
Primary Compounds of Concern Analytical
Method
Extraction/
Digestion
Method
Method
Detection
Limit
Reporting
Limit
QA/QC Requirements
SVOCs (soil & sediment only)µg/kg µg/kg
Diethylphthalate 8270E 3550 170 660 50 -124 20 ≤1/2 RL 50 -124
Dimethylphthalate 8270E 3550 158 660 48 -124 20 ≤1/2 RL 48 -124
Di-n-Butytl Phthalate 8270E 3550 164 660 51 -128 20 ≤1/2 RL 51 -128
Diphenylamine 8270E 3550 81 330 48 - 111 20 ≤1/2 RL 48 -111
Di-n-octyl-phthalate 8270E 3550 171 330 45 -140 20 ≤1/2 RL 45 -140
Fluoranthene 8270E 3550 166 660 50 -127 20 ≤1/2 RL 50 -127
Fluorene 8270E 3550 198 660 43 -125 20 ≤1/2 RL 43 -125
Hexachlorobenzene 8270E 3550 145 660 45 -122 20 ≤1/2 RL 45 -122
Hexachlorobutadiene 8270E 3550 149 660 32 -123 20 ≤1/2 RL 32 -123
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene 8270E 3550 227 660 32 -117 20 ≤1/2 RL 32 - 117
Hexachloroethane 8270E 3550 120 660 28 -117 20 ≤1/2 RL 28 -117
lndeno (1,2,3-c,d) pyrene 8270E 3550 120 660 45 -133 20 ≤1/2 RL 45 -133
lsophorone 8270E 3550 142 660 30 -122 20 ≤1/2 RL 30 -122
Naphthalene 8270E 3550 131 660 35 -123 20 ≤1/2 RL 35 -123
n-Decane 8270E 3550 108 330 45 -125 20 ≤1/2 RL 45 -125
Nitrobenzene 8270E 3550 140 330 34 -122 20 ≤1/2 RL 34 -122
N-Nitroso-dimethyl amine 8270E 3550 126 330 23 -120 20 ≤1/2 RL 23 -120
N-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine 8270E 3550 152 660 36 - 120 20 ≤1/2 RL 36 -120
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine 8270E 3550 181 660 38 -127 20 ≤1/2 RL 38 -127
N-Nitrosomorpholine 8270E 3550 34 330 45 -125 20 ≤1/2 RL 45 -125
n-Octadecane 8270E 3550 171 500 45 -125 20 ≤1/2 RL 45 -125
Pentachlorophenol 8270E 3550 421 1000 25 -133 20 ≤1/2 RL 25 -133
Phenanthrene 8270E 3550 171 660 50 -121 20 ≤1/2 RL 50 -121
Phenol 8270E 3550 108 660 34 -121 20 ≤1/2 RL 34 -121
Pyrene 8270E 3550 152 660 47 - 127 20 ≤1/2 RL 47 -127
Pyridine 8270E 3550 63 330 10 -60 20 ≤1/2 RL 10 -60
RCRA Metals (soil & sediment only)µg/kg µg/kg
Arsenic 6020B 3050 0.34 1 75 - 125 20 ≤1/2 RL 80 - 120
Barium 6020B 3050 3.2 10 75 - 125 20 ≤1/2 RL 80 - 120
Cadmium 6020B 3050 0.22 1 75 - 125 20 ≤1/2 RL 80 - 120
Chromium 6020B 3050 0.90 3 75 - 125 20 ≤1/2 RL 80 - 120
Hexavalent Chromium 7199 3060 42 400 75 - 125 20 ≤1/2 RL 80 - 120
Lead 6020B 3050 0.44 1 75 - 125 20 ≤1/2 RL 80 - 120
Mercury 7471B NA 0.017 0.05 80 - 120 20 ≤1/2 RL 80 - 120
Selenium 6020B 3050 0.98 5 75 - 125 20 ≤1/2 RL 80 - 120
Silver 6020B 3050 0.34 1 75 - 125 20 ≤1/2 RL 80 - 120
S:\AAA-Master Projects\PTRC\PTR002\Thomasville Furniture Plant B Site\Site-Specific QAPP\Tables
10/7/2019
Table 3 (Page 3 of 7)
Hart & Hickman, PC
Table 3 (Page 4 of 7)
Laboratory Analytical Quality Control
Thomasville Plant B
310 Fisher Ferry Street
Thomasville, North Carolina
H&H Job No. PTR-002
MS Percent
Recovery
MSD RPD
Percent
Method Blank
Acceptance
Limit
Laboratory
Control Percent
Recovery
Primary Compounds of Concern Analytical
Method
Extraction/
Digestion
Method
Method
Detection
Limit
Reporting
Limit
QA/QC Requirements
VOCs (water only)µg/l µg/l
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethene 8260 5030 0.35 1 78 -134 19 ≤1/2 RL 79 -134
1,1,1-Trichloroethane 8260 5030 0.31 1 67 -145 18 ≤1/2 RL 75 -136
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethene 8260 5030 0.34 1 68 -123 19 ≤1/2 RL 62 -127
1,1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-trifluoroethane 8260 5030 0.68 5 70 -130*20*≤1/2 RL 70 -130*
1,1,2-Trichloroethane 8260 5030 0.42 1 75 -134 18 ≤1/2 RL 70 -140
1,1-Dichloroethane 8260 5030 0.29 1 75 -134 18 ≤1/2 RL 78 -130
1,1-Dichloroethene 8260 5030 0.35 1 65 - 162 20 ≤1/2 RL 70 -154
1,1-Dichloropropene 8260 5030 0.37 1 68 -140 19 ≤1/2 RL 71 -136
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene 8260 5030 0.37 1 56 -146 31 ≤1/2 RL 58 -144
1,2,3-Trichloropropane 8260 5030 0.34 1 73 -122 18 ≤1/2 RL 71 - 127
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 8260 5030 0.44 1 67 -135 20 ≤1/2 RL 66 -139
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 8260 5030 0.34 1 75 -131 18 ≤1/2 RL 75 -133
1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane 8260 5030 0.6 2 64 -133 25 ≤1/2 RL 63 -134
1,2-Dibromoethane 8260 5030 0.37 1 80 -129 19 ≤1/2 RL 77 - 135
1,2-Dichlorobenzene 8260 5030 0.27 1 80 -125 16 ≤1/2 RL 78 -128
1,2-Dichloroethane 8260 5030 0.41 1 69 -129 17 ≤1/2 RL 68 -131
1,2-Dichloropropane 8260 5030 0.29 1 75 -131 17 ≤1/2 RL 77 -130
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 8260 5030 0.26 1 75 -131 19 ≤1/2 RL 75 -130
1,3-Dichlorobenzene 8260 5030 0.40 1 79 -122 17 ≤1/2 RL 77 - 131
1,3-Dichloropropane 8260 5030 0.40 1 80 -125 18 ≤1/2 RL 76 -125
1,4-Dichlorobenzene 8260 5030 0.42 1 76 -124 17 ≤1/2 RL 75 -132
1,4-Dichlorobutane 8260 5030 0.41 1 70 -130*20 ≤1/2 RL 70 -1301
1,4-Dioxane (SIM)8260 5030 0 3 70 -130*20 ≤1/2 RL 70 -130*
2,2-Dichloropropane 8260 5030 0.26 1 21 -140 19 ≤1/2 RL 29 -149
2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether 8260 5030 0.8 2 15 -181 44 ≤1/2 RL 34 -144
2-Chlorotoluene 8260 5030 0.36 1 75 -125 24 ≤1/2 RL 74 -126
3,3-dimethyl-1-butanol 8260 5030 0.63 10 70 -130*20*≤1/2 RL 70 -130*
4-Chlorotoluene 8260 5030 0.32 1 76 -130 16 ≤1/2 RL 78 - 129
4-lsopropyltoluene 8260 5030 0.1 1 72 -129 19 ≤1/2 RL 69 -132
Acetone 8260 5030 0.7 2 40 -162 23 ≤1/2 RL 40 -166
Acetonitrile 8260 5030 3.0 10 78 -129 20 ≤1/2 RL 81 -127
Acrolein 8260 5030 1.20 100 70 -130*20*≤1/2 RL 70 -130*
Acrylonitrile 8260 5030 0.85 100 78 -129 20 ≤1/2 RL 81 - 127
Allyl Chloride 8260 5030 0.75 10 70 -130*20*≤1/2 RL 70 -130*
Benzene 8260 5030 0.34 1 73 -131 17 ≤1/2 RL 77 -128
Bromobenzene 8260 5030 0.45 1 80 -125 18 ≤1/2 RL 78 -129
Bromochloromethane 8260 5030 0.5 2 78 -135 17 ≤1/2 RL 78 -135
Bromodichloromethane 8260 5030 0.29 1 74 -138 19 ≤1/2 RL 76 -138
Bromoform 8260 5030 0.26 1 72 -130 22 ≤1/2 RL 71 -135
Bromomethane 8260 5030 0.48 1 41 -173 33 ≤1/2 RL 41 -168
Carbon Disulfide 8260 5030 0.4 1 59 -138 27 ≤1/2 RL 59 -135
Carbon Tetrachloride 8260 5030 0.55 2 66 -149 23 ≤1/2 RL 72 -142
Chlorobenzene 8260 5030 0.3 1 76 -119 20 ≤1/2 RL 78 -119
Chloroethane 8260 5030 0.43 1 52 -153 24 ≤1/2 RL 57 - 142
Chloroform 8260 5030 0.48 1 74 -136 19 ≤1/2 RL 77 -130
Chloromethane 8260 5030 0.3 1 39 -155 20 ≤1/2 RL 47 -145
Chloroprene 8260 5030 0.86 10 70 -130*20*≤1/2 RL 70 -130*
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 8260 5030 0.40 1 74 -144 17 ≤1/2 RL 76 -141
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 8260 5030 0.36 1 64 -132 18 ≤1/2 RL 65 -140
Cyclohexane 8260 5030 0.33 1 70 -130*20*≤1/2 RL 70 - 130*
Dibromochloromethane 8260 5030 0.06 1 77 -131 21 ≤1/2 RL 75 -134
Dibromomethane 8260 5030 0.54 2 76 -136 18 ≤1/2 RL 76 -138
Dichlorodifluoromethane 8260 5030 0.47 5 22 -170 22 ≤1/2 RL 28 - 163
Epichlorohydrin 8260 5030 0.46 50 70 -130*20"≤1/2 RL 70 -130*
Ethanol 8260 5030 13.00 100 70 -130*20*≤1/2 RL 70 -130*
Ethyl Methacrylate 8260 5030 0.26 10 70 -130*20*≤1/2 RL 70 -130*
Ethylbenzene 8260 5030 0.3 1 78 -130 18 ≤1/2 RL 80 -127
Heptane 8260 5030 0.36 1 70 -130*20*≤1/2 RL 70 -130*
Hexachlorobutadiene 8260 5030 0.2 1 63 -132 26 ≤1/2 RL 61 -134
Hexane 8260 5030 0.76 10 70 -130*20*≤1/2 RL 70 - 130*
lsobutyl alcohol 8260 5030 5.0 10 70 -130*20*≤1/2 RL 70 - 130*
lsopropyl ether 8260 5030 0.41 1 62 -154 18 ≤1/2 RL 60 -154
lsopropylbenzene 8260 5030 0.33 1 72 -127 19 ≤1/2 RL 70 -130
m,p-Xylenes 8260 5030 0.73 2 66 -144 19 ≤1/2 RL 77 -133
Methacrylonitrile 8260 5030 0.57 10 70 -130*20*≤1/2 RL 70 -130*
Methyl acetate 8260 5030 0.40 1 70 -130*20*≤1/2 RL 70 -130*
Methyl butyl ketone 8260 5030 0.07 5 65 -130 23 ≤1/2 RL 64 -137
Methyl cyclohexane 8260 5030 0.49 5 70 -130*20*≤1/2 RL 70 -130*
Methyl ethyl ketone 8260 5030 0.78 5 65 -137 23 ≤1/2 RL 71 -134
Methyl Iodide 8260 5030 0.41 5 70 -130*20*≤1/2 RL 70 -130*
Methyl isobutyl ketone 8260 5030 0.40 5 64 -137 24 ≤1/2 RL 69 -134
Methyl methacrylate 8260 5030 0.27 10 70 -130*20*≤1/2 RL 70 -130*
Methylene Chloride 8260 5030 0.39 2 71 -134 17 ≤1/2 RL 73 -131
Methyl-tert-butyl ether 8260 5030 0.32 1 71 -133 19 ≤1/2 RL 68 -135
Naphthalene 8260 5030 0.45 1 63 -134 32 ≤1/2 RL 64 -136
n-Butylbenzene 8260 5030 0.34 1 69 -132 21 ≤1/2 RL 68 -134
S:\AAA-Master Projects\PTRC\PTR002\Thomasville Furniture Plant B Site\Site-Specific QAPP\Tables
10/7/2019
Table 3 (Page 4 of 7)
Hart & Hickman, PC
Table 3 (Page 5 of 7)
Laboratory Analytical Quality Control
Thomasville Plant B
310 Fisher Ferry Street
Thomasville, North Carolina
H&H Job No. PTR-002
MS Percent
Recovery
MSD RPD
Percent
Method Blank
Acceptance
Limit
Laboratory
Control Percent
Recovery
Primary Compounds of Concern Analytical
Method
Extraction/
Digestion
Method
Method
Detection
Limit
Reporting
Limit
QA/QC Requirements
VOCs (water only)µg/l µg/l
n-Propylbenzene 8260 5030 0.36 1 75 -130 18 ≤1/2 RL 72 -132
o-Xylene 8260 5030 0.40 1 75 -131 20 ≤1/2 RL 78 -128
Pentachloroethane 8260 5030 1.4 10 70 -130*20*≤1/2 RL 70 -130*
Propionitrile 8260 5030 2.10 10 70 -130*20*≤1/2 RL 70 -130*
sec-Butylbenzene 8260 5030 0.38 1 72 -130 20 ≤1/2 RL 71 -131
Styrene 8260 5030 0.26 1 77 -128 17 ≤1/2 RL 78 -129
tert-Amyl Alcohol 8260 5030 0.47 1 70 -130*20*≤1/2 RL 70 -130*
tert-Amyl Ethyl ether 8260 5030 0.62 2 70 -130*20*≤1/2 RL 70 -130*
tert-Amyl Methyl Ether 8260 5030 0.82 2 70 -130*20*≤1/2 RL 70 -130*
tert-Butyl Alcohol 8260 5030 1.10 10 70 -130*20*≤1/2 RL 70 -130*
tert-Butylbenzene 8260 5030 0.34 1 72 -130 20 ≤1/2 RL 70 -132
tert-Butyl Ethyl Ether 8260 5030 0.62 2 70 -130*20*≤1/2 RL 70 -130*
tert-Butyl Formate 8260 5030 1.20 10 70 -130*20*≤1/2 RL 70 -130*
Tetrachloroethene 8260 5030 0.31 1 76 -130 20 ≤1/2 RL 80 -129
Tetrahydrofuran 8260 5030 0.68 2 70 -130*20*≤1/2 RL 70 -130*
Toluene 8260 5030 0.35 1 72 -135 18 ≤1/2 RL 76 -131
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 8260 5030 0.37 1 73 -141 18 ≤1/2 RL 76 -135
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 8260 5030 0.49 1 64 -137 21 ≤1/2 RL 67 -140
trans-1,4-Dichloro-2-butene 8260 5030 0.22 1 70 -130*20*≤1/2 RL 70 -130*
Trichloroethene 8260 5030 0.46 2 72 -133 17 ≤1/2 RL 77 -133
Trichlorofluoromethane 8260 5030 0.23 1 61 -152 27 ≤1/2 RL 62 -148
Vinyl acetate 8260 5030 0.26 1 80 -154 18 ≤1/2 RL 34 -167
Vinyl Chloride 8260 5030 0.41 2 54 -146 25 ≤1/2 RL 57 -141
SVOCs (water only)µg/l µg/l
1,1-Biphenyl 8270E 3520 0.81 10 35 - 115*50*≤1/2 RL 35 - 115*
1,2,4,5-Tetrachlorobenzene 8270E 3520 1.1 10 45 - 135*50*≤1/2 RL 45 - 135*
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 8270E 3520 4.0 10 44 -100 30 ≤1/2 RL 45 -103
1,2-Dichlorobenzene 8270E 3520 4.0 10 42 -99 34 ≤1/2 RL 43 -100
1,2-Diphenylhydrazine 8270E 3520 2.9 10 40 - 135*50*≤1/2 RL 40 - 135*
1,3,5-Trinitrobenzene 8270E 3520 1.5 10 45 - 135*50*≤1/2 RL 45 - 135*
1,3-Dichlorobenzene 8270E 3520 3.9 10 35 - 101 36 ≤1/2 RL 42 -98
1,3-Dinitrobenzene 8270E 3520 2.8 10 45 - 135*50*≤1/2 RL 45 - 135*
1,4-Dichlorobenzene 8270E 3520 4.1 10 43 -97 35 ≤1/2 RL 42 -100
1,4-Dioxane 8270E 3520 2.0 10 45 - 135*50*≤1/2 RL 45 - 135*
1,4-Diphenylenediamine 8270E 3520 1.1 10 45 - 135*50*≤1/2 RL 45 - 135*
1,4-Napthaquinone 8270E 3520 1.2 10 45 - 135*50*≤1/2 RL 45 - 135*
1-Chloronaphthalene 8270E 3520 0.98 10 45 - 135*50*≤1/2 RL 45 - 135*
1-Methylnaphthalene 8270E 3520 4.3 10 45 - 135*50*≤1/2 RL 45 - 135*
1-Methylphenanthrene 8270E 3520 1.80 10 45 -135*50*≤1/2 RL 45 - 135*
1-Napthylamine 8270E 3520 2.8 10 45 - 135*50*≤1/2 RL 45 - 135*
2,3,4,6-Tetrachlorophenol 8270E 3520 4.0 10 45 - 135*50*≤1/2 RL 45 - 135*
2,3-Dichloroanaline 8270E 3520 3.8 10 45 - 135*50*≤1/2 RL 45 - 135*
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol 8270E 3520 3.6 20 51 -122 22 ≤1/2 RL 66 -120
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol 8270E 3520 4.5 20 46 -117 30 ≤1/2 RL 62 -121
2,4-Dichlorophenol 8270E 3520 2.6 10 42 -108 31 ≤1/2 RL 58 -113
2,4-Dimethylphenol 8270E 3520 4.9 10 13 -122 36 ≤1/2 RL 42 -120
2,4-Dinitrophenol 8270E 3520 11.8 50 10 -166 41 ≤1/2 RL 27 -129
2,4-Dinitrotoluene 8270E 3520 4.2 10 64 -135 24 ≤1/2 RL 62 -136
2,6-Dichlorophenol 8270E 3520 3.9 20 45 - 135*50*≤1/2 RL 45 - 135*
2,6-Dinitrotoluene 8270E 3520 3.9 20 50 -146 28 ≤1/2 RL 64 -129
2-Acetylaminofluorene 8270E 3520 0.5 10 45 - 135*50*≤1/2 RL 45 - 135*
2-Chloronaphthalene 8270E 3520 4.7 20 46 -114 30 ≤1/2 RL 38 -141
2-Chlorophenol 8270E 3520 2.7 10 36 -94 37 ≤1/2 RL 49 -107
2-Methylnaphthalene 8270E 3520 4.2 10 36 -115 33 ≤1/2 RL 55 -112
2-Methylphenol 8270E 3520 2.4 10 27 -92 36 ≤1/2 RL 40 -106
2-Napthylamine 8270E 3520 1.0 10 45 - 135*50*≤1/2 RL 45 - 135*
2-Nitroaniline 8270E 3520 4.1 10 51 -139 24 ≤1/2 RL 65 -122
2-Nitrophenol 8270E 3520 2.6 10 43 -108 33 ≤1/2 RL 57 -115
2-Picoline 8270E 3520 2.2 10 45 -135*50*≤1/2 RL 45 -135*
3&4-Methylphenol 8270E 3520 2.5 10 22 -84 30 ≤1/2 RL 34 -101
3,3'-Dimethylbenzidine 8270E 3520 5.60 10 45 -135*50*≤1/2 RL 45 -135*
3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine 8270E 3520 3.90 10 10 -214 34 ≤1/2 RL 58 -139
3,4-Dimethylphenol 8270E 3520 2.7 10 45 -135*50*≤1/2 RL 45 -135*
3-Methylcholanthrene 8270E 3520 0.4 10 45 -135*50*≤1/2 RL 45 -135*
3-Nitroaniline 8270E 3520 3.8 10 50 -145 24 ≤1/2 RL 52 - 155
4,6-Dinitro-2-methyl phenol 8270E 3520 11.30 50 25 -152 35 ≤1/2 RL 49 -138
4-Aminobiphenyl 8270E 3520 1.4 10 45 -135*50*≤1/2 RL 45 -135*
4-Bromophenyl-phenyl ether 8270E 3520 4.4 20 52 -128 21 ≤1/2 RL 63 -135
4-Chloro-3-Methylphenol 8270E 3520 2.9 10 44 -110 25 ≤1/2 RL 33 -149
4-Chloroanailine 8270E 3520 3.5 10 10 -156 38 ≤1/2 RL 44 -163
4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether 8270E 3520 4.70 20 55 -125 29 ≤1/2 RL 63 -129
4-Nitroaniline 8270E 3520 4.1 10 39 -159 29 ≤1/2 RL 63 -147
4-Nitrophenol 8270E 3520 2.6 10 10 -105 40 ≤1/2 RL 10 - 77
4-Nitroquinoline-1-oxide 8270E 3520 0.53 10 45 -135*50*≤1/2 RL 45 -135*
5-Nitro-o-toluidine 8270E 3520 1.0 10 45 -135*50*≤1/2 RL 45 -135*
S:\AAA-Master Projects\PTRC\PTR002\Thomasville Furniture Plant B Site\Site-Specific QAPP\Tables
10/7/2019
Table 3 (Page 5 of 7)
Hart & Hickman, PC
Table 3 (Page 6 of 7)
Laboratory Analytical Quality Control
Thomasville Plant B
310 Fisher Ferry Street
Thomasville, North Carolina
H&H Job No. PTR-002
MS Percent
Recovery
MSD RPD
Percent
Method Blank
Acceptance
Limit
Laboratory
Control Percent
Recovery
Primary Compounds of Concern Analytical
Method
Extraction/
Digestion
Method
Method
Detection
Limit
Reporting
Limit
QA/QC Requirements
SVOCs (water only)µg/l µg/l
7,12-Dimethylbenz(a)anthracene 8270E 3520 0.7 10 45 - 135*50*≤1/2 RL 45 -135*
a,a-Dimethylphenthylamine 8270E 3520 2.6 20 45 -135*50*≤1/2 RL 45 -135*
Acenaphthene 8270E 3520 4.2 10 55 -117 33 ≤1/2 RL 64 -118
Acenaphthylene 8270E 3520 4.4 20 52 -121 30 ≤1/2 RL 65 -119
Acetophenone 8270E 3520 3.4 20 57 -116 50*≤1/2 RL 57 -116
Aniline 8270E 3520 4.6 20 11 -124 35 ≤1/2 RL 12 -197
Anthracene 8270E 3520 4.6 10 60 -136 27 ≤1/2 RL 69 -134
Aramite 8270E 3520 1.5 10 45 - 135*50*≤1/2 RL 45 -135*
Atrazine 8270E 3520 1.1 10 45 -113 16 ≤1/2 RL 47 -109
Azobenzene 8270E 3520 3.2 10 50 -135 34 ≤1/2 RL 56 -129
Benzaldehyde 8270E 3520 2.4 10 35 -115 50 ≤1/2 RL 35 -115
Benzidine 8270E 3520 4.10 10 15 -150*50*≤1/2 RL 15 -150*
Benzo (a) anthracene 8270E 3520 3.2 10 64 -135 18 ≤1/2 RL 71 -125
Benzo (a) pyrene 8270E 3520 3.5 10 68 -136 21 ≤1/2 RL 67 -135
Benzo (b) fluoranthene 8270E 3520 3.4 10 61 -149 34 ≤1/2 RL 56 -145
Benzo (g,h,i) perylene 8270E 3520 3.6 10 47-151 27 ≤1/2 RL 44 -149
Benzo (k) fluoranthene 8270E 3520 2.6 10 45 -148 39 ≤1/2 RL 65 - 138
Benzoic Acid 8270E 3520 19.3 100 45 - 135*50*≤1/2 RL 45 -135*
Benzyl Alcohol 8270E 3520 2.5 10 30 -97 37 ≤1/2 RL 34 - 111
Bis(2-chloroethoxy) methane 8270E 3520 3.8 10 43 -119 30 ≤1/2 RL 49 -126
Bis(2-chloroethyl) ether 8270E 3520 2.6 10 36 -115 33 ≤1/2 RL 47 -124
Bis(2-chloroisopropyl) ether 8270E 3520 2.8 10 36 -113 34 ≤1/2 RL 42 - 126
Bis(2-Ethylhexyl) phthalate 8270E 3520 3.7 10 50 -168 21 ≤1/2 RL 59 -139
Butyl benzyl phthalate 8270E 3520 2.9 10 52 -166 23 ≤1/2 RL 67 - 133
Caprolactam 8270E 3520 1.6 10 35 - 115*50*≤1/2 RL 35 - 115*
Carbazole 8270E 3520 4.1 20 61 -154 50*≤1/2 RL 61 -154
Chlorobenzilate 8270E 3520 0.65 10 45 - 135*50*≤1/2 RL 45 - 135*
Chrysene 8270E 3520 3.3 10 62 -135 22 ≤1/2 RL 72 -124
n-Decane 8270E 3520 3.4 10 45 - 135*50*≤1/2 RL 45 - 135*
Diallate 8270E 3520 1.1 10 45 - 135*50*≤1/2 RL 45 - 135*
Dibenzo (a,h) anthracene 8270E 3520 5.7 20 45 -155 28 ≤1/2 RL 49 - 144
Dibenzofuran 8270E 3520 4.3 20 58 -119 23 ≤1/2 RL 68 -113
Diethylphthalate 8270E 3520 4.2 20 55 -137 22 ≤1/2 RL 70 -124
Dimethoate 8270E 3520 1.3 10 45 - 135*50*≤1/2 RL 45 - 135*
Dimethylphthalate 8270E 3520 4.0 10 46 -135 25 ≤1/2 RL 71 -117
Di-n-butyl phthalate 8270E 3520 4.3 10 53 -141 24 ≤1/2 RL 69 - 128
Di-n-octyl-phthalate 8270E 3520 4.5 10 48 -166 21 ≤1/2 RL 52 - 150
Dinoseb 8270E 3520 0.87 10 45 - 135*50*≤1/2 RL 45 - 135*
Diphenylamine 8270E 3520 2.0 10 45 - 135*50*≤1/2 RL 45 - 135*
Disulfoton 8270E 3520 1.8 10 45 - 135*50*≤1/2 RL 45 - 135*
Ethylmethane sulfonate 8270E 3520 1.60 10 45 - 135*50*≤1/2 RL 45 - 135*
Famphur 8270E 3520 2.0 20 45 - 135*50*≤1/2 RL 45 - 135*
Fluoranthene 8270E 3520 4.0 10 51 -136 26 ≤1/2 RL 66 -135
Fluorene 8270E 3520 5.0 10 57 -121 30 ≤1/2 RL 67 -124
Hexachlorobenzene 8270E 3520 3.9 20 55 -131 29 ≤1/2 RL 62 -124
Hexachlorobutadiene 8270E 3520 4.5 20 39 -110 35 ≤1/2 RL 42 - 105
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene 8270E 3520 7.3 20 26 -122 36 ≤1/2 RL 32 -117
Hexachloroethane 8270E 3520 3.7 10 37 -98 37 ≤1/2 RL 40 -99
Hexachloropropene 8270E 3520 1.7 10 45 -135*50*≤1/2 RL 45 -135*
lndeno (1,2,3-c,d) pyrene 8270E 3520 2.6 10 14 -177 34 ≤1/2 RL 40 -150
lsodrin 8270E 3520 1.4 10 45 -135*50*≤1/2 RL 45 -135*
lsophorone 8270E 3520 4.1 10 49 -113 27 ≤1/2 RL 54 -125
lsosafrole 8270E 3520 1 10 45 -135*50*≤1/2 RL 45 -135*
Kepone 8270E 3520 1.6 20 45 -135*50*≤1/2 RL 45 -135*
Methapyrilene 8270E 3520 5.0 50 45 -135*50*≤1/2 RL 45 - 1355
Methyl parathion 8270E 3520 1.0 10 45 -135*50*≤1/2 RL 45 -135*
Methylmethane sulfonate 8270E 3520 1.1 20 45 -135*50*≤1/2 RL 45 -135*
Naphthalene 8270E 3520 4.1 10 38 -109 35 ≤1/2 RL 54 -111
Nitrobenzene 8270E 3520 3.8 10 34 -117 34 ≤1/2 RL 51 -117
N-Nitrosodibutylamine 8270E 3520 1.0 10 45 -135*50*≤1/2 RL 45 -135*
N-Nitrosodiethylamine 8270E 3520 2.1 10 45 -135*50*≤1/2 RL 45 -135*
N-Nitroso-dimethyl amine 8270E 3520 1.3 10 10 -119 45 ≤1/2 RL 10 -119
N-Nitrosomethylethylamine 8270E 3520 1.8 10 45 -135*50*≤1/2 RL 45 -135*
N-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine 8270E 3520 3.3 20 44 -115 33 ≤1/2 RL 55 -115
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine 8270E 3520 4.4 20 57 -156 26 ≤1/2 RL 69 -152
N-Nitrosomorpholine 8270E 3520 0.3 10 45 -135*50*≤1/2 RL 45 -135*
N-Nitrosopiperidine 8270E 3520 1.3 10 45 -135*50*≤1/2 RL 45 -135*
N-Nitrosopyrrolidine 8270E 3520 1.2 10 45 -135*50*≤1/2 RL 45 -135*
o,o,o-Triethylphosphorthioate 8270E 3520 1.1 10 45 -135*50*≤1/2 RL 45 -135*
o-Toluidine 8270E 3520 0.9 10 45 - 135*50*≤1/2 RL 45 -135*
Parathion 8270E 3520 1.20 10 45 - 135*50*≤1/2 RL 45 - 135*
p-Benzoquinone 8270E 3520 1.9 10 13 -183 50*≤1/2 RL 13 -183
p-Dimethylaminoazobenzene 8270E 3520 0.7 10 45 -135*50*≤1/2 RL 45 - 135*
n-Octadecane 8270E 3520 3.7 10 45 -135*50*≤1/2 RL 45 -135*
Pentachlorobenzene 8270E 3520 1.4 10 45 -135*50*≤1/2 RL 45 - 135*
Pentachloroethane 8270E 3520 2.1 10 45 -135*50*≤1/2 RL 45 -135*
S:\AAA-Master Projects\PTRC\PTR002\Thomasville Furniture Plant B Site\Site-Specific QAPP\Tables
10/7/2019
Table 3 (Page 6 of 7)
Hart & Hickman, PC
Table 3 (Page 7 of 7)
Laboratory Analytical Quality Control
Thomasville Plant B
310 Fisher Ferry Street
Thomasville, North Carolina
H&H Job No. PTR-002
MS Percent
Recovery
MSD RPD
Percent
Method Blank
Acceptance
Limit
Laboratory
Control Percent
Recovery
Primary Compounds of Concern Analytical
Method
Extraction/
Digestion
Method
Method
Detection
Limit
Reporting
Limit
QA/QC Requirements
SVOCs (water only)µg/l µg/l
Pentachloronitrobenzene 8270E 3520 1.0 10 45 -135*50*≤1/2 RL 45 -135*
Pentachlorophenol 8270E 3520 10.8 50 17 -167 36 ≤1/2 RL 23 -139
Phenacetin 8270E 3520 1.1 10 45 -135*50*≤1/2 RL 45 -135*
Phenanthrene 8270E 3520 3.9 10 62 -131 23 ≤1/2 RL 68 -128
Phenol 8270E 3520 1.4 10 10 -47 43 ≤1/2 RL 12 -58
Phorate 8270E 3520 1.5 10 45 -135*50*≤1/2 RL 45 -135*
Pronamide 8270E 3520 0.4 10 45 -135*50*≤1/2 RL 45 -135*
Pyrene 8270E 3520 3.5 10 46 -156 31 ≤1/2 RL 62 -139
Pyridine 8270E 3520 1.6 10 46 -156 31 ≤1/2 RL 10 -53
Safrole 8270E 3520 0.8 10 45 -135*50*≤1/2 RL 45 -135*
Sulfotepp 8270E 3520 1.0 10 45 -135*50*≤1/2 RL 45 -135*
a-Terpineol 8270E 3520 2.2 10 45 -135*50*≤1/2 RL 45 -135*
Thionazin 8270E 3520 0.9 10 45 -135*50*≤1/2 RL 45 -135*
RCRA Metals (water only)µg/l µg/l
Arsenic 6020B 3010 0.00036 0.0010 75 - 125 20 ≤1/2 RL 80 - 120
Barium 6020B 3010 0.00034 0.010 75 - 125 20 ≤1/2 RL 80 - 120
Cadmium 6020B 3010 0.000097 0.0005 75 - 125 20 ≤1/2 RL 80 - 120
Chromium 6020B 3010 0.00026 0.0010 75 - 125 20 ≤1/2 RL 80 - 120
Lead 6020B 3010 0.00019 0.0010 75 - 125 20 ≤1/2 RL 80 - 120
Mercury 7470A NA 0.16 0.5 80 - 120 20 ≤1/2 RL 80 - 120
Selenium 6020B 3010 0.00027 0.0010 75 - 125 20 ≤1/2 RL 80 - 120
Silver 6020B 3010 0.00012 0.0005 75 - 125 20 ≤1/2 RL 80 - 120
Hardness (surface water only)mg/L mg/L
Hardness (Titration)2340C NA 0.57 5.0 80-120 20 <MDL 80-120
The laboratory precision requirements for laboratory method blanks and trip blanks is below laboratory reporting limtis.
Notes:
RCRA = Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
MS = Matrix spike; MSD = Matrix spike duplicate; RPD = Relative percent difference; NA = Not applicble
* = Initial Start-up Limits
Soil and water information is specific to Prism Laboratories, Inc. (Prism) and their defined subcontractors.
For additional QA/QC requirements and laboratory procedures for additional compounds refer to the Prism QAP in Appendix C of the Generic QAPP.
VOCs = volatile organic compounds; SVOCs = semi-volatile organic compounds
S:\AAA-Master Projects\PTRC\PTR002\Thomasville Furniture Plant B Site\Site-Specific QAPP\Tables
10/7/2019
Table 3 (Page 7 of 7)
Hart & Hickman, PC
Table 4 (Page 1 of 12)
Analytical Sensitivity and Project Criteria
Thomasville Plant B
310 Fisher Ferry Street
Thomasville, North Carolina
H&H Job No. PTR-002
Industrial
PSRGs1
Residential
PSRGs2 2L Standards3 Non-Residential
GWSLs4
Residential
GWSLs5 2B Standards6
VOCs (soil & sediment only)µg/kg µg/kg µg/kg µg/kg
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 8260 5030 0.61 5 NE NE --------
1,1,1-Trichloroethane 8260 5030 0.74 5 7,600,000 1,700,000 --------
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 8260 5030 0.36 5 2,800 640 --------
1,1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-Trifluoroethane 8260 5030 0.87 10 6,000,000 1,400,000 --------
1,1,2-Trichloroethane 8260 5030 0.54 5 1,300 320 --------
1,1-Dichloroethane 8260 5030 0.90 5 17,000 3,800 --------
1,1-Dichloroethene 8260 5030 0.92 5 210,000 48,000 --------
1,1-Dichloropropene 8260 5030 0.77 5 NE NE --------
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene 8260 5030 0.72 10 190,000 13,000 --------
1,2,3-Trichloropropane 8260 5030 0.57 5 110 5.1 --------
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 8260 5030 0.48 10 55,000 12,000 --------
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 8260 5030 0.53 10 370,000 63,000 --------
1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane 8260 5030 0.6 5 68 5.6 --------
1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)8260 5030 0.45 5 170 38 --------
1,2-Dichlorobenzene 8260 5030 0.56 5 2,000,000 380,000 --------
1,2-Dichloroethane 8260 5030 0.60 5 2,200 490 --------
1,2-Dichloropropane 8260 5030 0.75 5 12,000 2,600 --------
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 8260 5030 0.63 5 320,000 56,000 --------
1,3-Dichlorobenzene 8260 5030 0.62 5 NE NE --------
1,3-Dichloropropane 8260 5030 0.42 5 4,700,000 310,000 --------
1,4-Dichlorobenzene 8260 5030 0.63 5 12,000 2,800 --------
1,4-Dichlorobutane 8260 5030 0.50 10 NE NE --------
1,4-Dioxane 8260 5030 0 3 25,000 5,400 --------
2,2-Dichloropropane 8260 5030 0.62 5 NE NE --------
2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether 8260 5030 0.7 10 NE NE --------
2-Chlorotoluene 8260 5030 0.67 5 4,700,000 310,000 --------
2-Methyltetrahydrofuran 8260 5030 1.00 10 NE NE --------
4-Chlorotoluene 8260 5030 0.57 5 4,700,000 310,000 --------
4-Isopropyltoluene 8260 5030 0.4 15 NE NE --------
Acetone 8260 5030 1.3 20 140,000,000 12,000,000 --------
Acrolein 8260 5030 0.9 20 130 31 --------
Acrylonitrile 8260 5030 1.00 20 1,200 270 --------
Benzene 8260 5030 0.78 5 5,400 1,200 --------
Bromobenzene 8260 5030 0.69 5 370,000 59,000 --------
Bromochloromethane 8260 5030 0.82 5 1,400 310 --------
Bromodichloromethane 8260 5030 0.47 5 1,400 310 --------
Bromoform 8260 5030 0.4 5 9,000 2,000 --------
Bromomethane 8260 5030 2.40 10 6,400 1,400 --------
Carbon Disulfide 8260 5030 0.86 5 740,000 160,000 --------
Carbon Tetrachloride 8260 5030 0.98 5 3,000 690 --------
Primary Compounds of Concern Analytical
Method
Extraction/
Digestion
Method
Method
Detection Limit Reporting Limit
Project Criteria
S:\AAA-Master Projects\PTRC\PTR002\Thomasville Furniture Plant B Site\Site-Specific QAPP\Tables10/7/2019
Table 4 (Page 1 of 12)
Hart & Hickman, PC
Table 4 (Page 2 of 12)
Analytical Sensitivity and Project Criteria
Thomasville Plant B
310 Fisher Ferry Street
Thomasville, North Carolina
H&H Job No. PTR-002
Industrial
PSRGs1
Residential
PSRGs2 2L Standards3 Non-Residential
GWSLs4
Residential
GWSLs5 2B Standards6Primary Compounds of Concern Analytical
Method
Extraction/
Digestion
Method
Method
Detection Limit Reporting Limit
Project Criteria
VOCs (soil & sediment only)µg/kg µg/kg µg/kg µg/kg
Chlorobenzene 8260 5030 0.8 5 280,000 58,000 --------
Chloroethane 8260 5030 0.95 10 12,000,000 2,900,000 --------
Chloroform 8260 5030 0.6 5 1,500 340 --------
Chloromethane 8260 5030 1.50 10 99,000 23,000 --------
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 8260 5030 0.79 5 470,000 31,000 --------
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 8260 5030 0.5 5 NE NE --------
Cyclohexane 8260 5030 0.61 5 5,800,000 1,400,000 --------
Dibromochloromethane 8260 5030 0.34 5 39,000 8,300 --------
Dibromomethane 8260 5030 0.56 5 21,000 5,000 --------
Dichlorodifluoromethane 8260 5030 1.40 10 78,000 18,000 --------
Ethanol 8260 5030 18.00 250 NE NE --------
Ethyl tert-Butyl ether 8260 5030 1.70 100 NE NE --------
Ethylbenzene 8260 5030 0.75 5 27,000 6,100 --------
Hexachlorobutadiene 8260 5030 0.82 10 5,600 1,300 --------
Hexane 8260 5030 0.59 10 540,000 130,000 --------
Isopropyl ether 8260 5030 0.73 5 2,000,000 480,000 --------
Isopropylbenzene 8260 5030 0.6 5 2,100,000 410,000 --------
m,p-Xylenes 8260 5030 1.30 10 500,000 120,000 --------
Methyl Acetate 8260 5030 0.5 5 230,000,000 16,000,000 --------
Methyl Butyl Ketone (2-Hexanone)8260 5030 0,34 20 280,000 42,000 --------
Methylcyclohexane 8260 5030 0.3 5 NE NE --------
Methyl ethyl ketone (MEK)8260 5030 1.20 20 40,000,000 5,500,000 --------
Methyl iodide 8260 5030 1.90 10 NE NE --------
Methyl Isobutyl Ketone (MIBK)8260 5030 0.41 20 30,000,000 7,000,000 --------
Methylene Chloride 8260 5030 0.81 5 650,000 58,000 --------
Methyl-tert-butyl ether (MTBE)8260 5030 0.70 5 220,000 49,000 --------
Naphthalene 8260 5030 0.50 10 18,000 4,100 --------
n-Butylbenzene 8260 5030 0.47 5 12,000,000 780,000 --------
n-Propylbenzene 8260 5030 0.72 5 NE NE --------
o-Xylene 8260 5030 0.53 5 590,000 140,000 --------
sec-Butylbenzene 8260 5030 0.54 5 23,000,000 1,600,000 --------
Styrene 8260 5030 0.48 5 7,300,000 1,200,000 --------
tert-Amyl Alcohol 8260 5030 32.00 400 73,000 17,000 --------
tert-Amyl Methyl Ether 8260 5030 7.30 100 NE NE --------
tert-Butyl Alcohol 8260 5030 1.30 200 NE NE --------
tert-Butyl Formate 8260 5030 17.00 400 NE NE --------
tert-Butylbenzene 8260 5030 0.59 5 23,000,000 1,600,000 --------
Tetrachloroethene 8260 5030 0.90 5 82,000 17,000 --------
Tetrahydrofuran 8260 5030 0.4 5 20,000,000 3,800,000 --------
Toluene 8260 5030 0.80 5 9,700,000 990,000 --------
S:\AAA-Master Projects\PTRC\PTR002\Thomasville Furniture Plant B Site\Site-Specific QAPP\Tables10/7/2019
Table 4 (Page 2 of 12)
Hart & Hickman, PC
Table 4 (Page 3 of 12)
Analytical Sensitivity and Project Criteria
Thomasville Plant B
310 Fisher Ferry Street
Thomasville, North Carolina
H&H Job No. PTR-002
Industrial
PSRGs1
Residential
PSRGs2 2L Standards3 Non-Residential
GWSLs4
Residential
GWSLs5 2B Standards6Primary Compounds of Concern Analytical
Method
Extraction/
Digestion
Method
Method
Detection Limit Reporting Limit
Project Criteria
VOCs (soil & sediment only)µg/kg µg/kg µg/kg µg/kg
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 8260 5030 0.96 5 4,700,000 310,000 --------
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 8260 5030 0.43 5 8,600 1,900 --------
trans-1,4-Dichloro-2-butene 8260 5030 0.58 10 35 8 --------
Trichloroethene 8260 5030 0.97 5 4,000 870 --------
Trichlorofluoromethane 8260 5030 1.30 10 70,000,000 4,700,000 --------
Vinyl Acetate 8260 5030 0.54 10 820,000 190,000 --------
Vinyl Chloride 8260 5030 0.99 10 1,700 610 --------
Xylenes, total 8260 5030 1.80 15 530,000 120,000 --------
SVOCs (soil & sediment only)µg/kg µg/kg µg/kg µg/kg
1,1-Biphenyl 8270E 3550 89 330 43,000 10,000 --------
1-Methylnaphthalene 8270E 3550 140 660 73,000 18,000 --------
1-Methylphenanthrene 8270E 3550 28 330 NE NE --------
1,2,4,5-Tetrachlorobenzene 8270E 3550 110 330 70,000 4,700 --------
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 8270E 3550 117 660 55,000 12,000 --------
1,2-Dichlorobenzene 8270E 3550 107 660 2,000,000 380,000 --------
1,3-Dichlorobenzene 8270E 3550 97 660 NE NE --------
1,4-Dichlorobenzene 8270E 3550 104 330 12,000 2,800 --------
2,3-Dichloroaniline 8270E 3550 154 500 NE NE
2,3,4,6-Tetrachlorophenol 8270E 3550 195 500 4,900,000 380,000 --------
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol 8270E 3550 140 660 16,000,000 1,300,000 --------
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol 8270E 3550 160 660 160,000 13,000 --------
2,4-Dichlorophenol 8270E 3550 129 660 490,000 38,000 --------
2,4-Dimethylphenol 8270E 3550 137 330 3,300,000 250,000 --------
2,4-Dinitrophenol 8270E 3550 387 1500 330,000 25,000 --------
2,4-Dinitrotoluene 8270E 3550 175 660 7,400 1,700 --------
2,6-Dinitrotoluene 8270E 3550 171.0 660 1,500 360 --------
2-Chloronaphthalene 8270E 3550 161 660 12,000,000 960,000 --------
2-Chlorophenol 8270E 3550 126 660 1,200,000 78,000 --------
2-Methylnaphthalene 8270E 3550 128 660 600,000 48,000 --------
2-Methylphenol 8270E 3550 126 660 8,200,000 630,000 --------
2-Nitroaniline 8270E 3550 142 660 1,600,000 130,000 --------
2-Nitrophenol 8270E 3550 110 660 NE NE --------
3&4-Methylphenol 8270E 3550 143 660 8,200,000 630,000 --------
3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine 8270E 3550 131 660 NE NE --------
3-Nitroaniline 8270E 3550 125 660 NE NE --------
3,4-Dimethylphenol 8270E 3550 78 330 160,000 13,000 --------
4,6-Dinitro-2-methyl phenol 8270E 3550 364 1500 NE NE --------
4-Bromophenyl-phenyl ether 8270E 3550 155 660 NE NE --------
4-Chloro-3-Methylphenol 8270E 3550 126 660 NE NE --------
4-Chloroaniline 8270E 3550 78 330 11,000 2,700 --------
S:\AAA-Master Projects\PTRC\PTR002\Thomasville Furniture Plant B Site\Site-Specific QAPP\Tables10/7/2019
Table 4 (Page 3 of 12)
Hart & Hickman, PC
Table 4 (Page 4 of 12)
Analytical Sensitivity and Project Criteria
Thomasville Plant B
310 Fisher Ferry Street
Thomasville, North Carolina
H&H Job No. PTR-002
Industrial
PSRGs1
Residential
PSRGs2 2L Standards3 Non-Residential
GWSLs4
Residential
GWSLs5 2B Standards6Primary Compounds of Concern Analytical
Method
Extraction/
Digestion
Method
Method
Detection Limit Reporting Limit
Project Criteria
SVOCs (soil & sediment only)µg/kg µg/kg µg/kg µg/kg
4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether 8270E 3550 202 1000 NE NE --------
4-Nitroaniline 8270E 3550 103 330 110,000 27,000 --------
4-Nitrophenol 8270E 3550 163 660 NE NE --------
Acenaphthene 8270E 3550 159 660 9,000,000 720,000 --------
Acenaphthylene 8270E 3550 178 660 NE NE --------
Acetaphenone 8270E 3550 174 660 23,000,000 1,600,000 --------
Aniline 8270E 3550 163 660 400,000 88,000 --------
Anthracene 8270E 3550 179 660 45,000,000 3,600,000 --------
Atrazine 8270E 3550 81 330 10,000 2,400 --------
Azobenzene 8270E 3550 141 660 26,000 5,600 --------
Benzaldehyde 8270E 3550 57 330 820,000 170,000 --------
Benzidine 8270E 3550 38 330 10 0.53 --------
Benzo (a) anthracene 8270E 3550 141 660 21,000 1,100 --------
Benzo (a) pyrene 8270E 3550 147 660 2,100 110 --------
Benzo (b) fluoranthene 8270E 3550 154 660 2,100 1,100 --------
Benzo (b/k) fluoranthene 8270E 3550 33 330 21,000 1,100 --------
Benzoic acid 8270E 3550 548 2000 660,000,000 51,000,000 --------
Benzyl Alcohol 8270E 3550 124 660 16,000,000 1,300,000 --------
Bis(2-chloroethoxy) methane 8270E 3550 136 660 NE NE --------
Bis(2-chloroethyl) ether 8270E 3550 106 660 1,100 240 --------
Bis(2-chloroisopropyl) ether 8270E 3550 118 330 9,300,000 630,000 --------
Bis(2-Ethylhexyl) phthalate 8270E 3550 149 660 160,000 39,000 --------
Butyl benzyl phthalate 8270E 3550 114 330 1,200,000 290,000 --------
Caprolactam 8270E 3550 123 330 82,000,000 6,300,000 --------
Carbazole 8270E 3550 152 660 NE NE --------
Chrysene 8270E 3550 145 660 2,100,000 110,000 --------
n-Decane 8270E 3550 108 330 NE NE --------
Dibenzo (a,h) anthracene 8270E 3550 190 660 2,100 110 --------
Dibenzofuran 8270E 3550 178 660 210,000 15,000 --------
Diethylphthalate 8270E 3550 170 660 130,000,000 10,000,000 --------
Dimethylphthalate 8270E 3550 158 660 NE NE --------
Di-n-Butyl Phthalate 8270E 3550 164 660 16,000,000 1,300,000 --------
Di-n-octyl-phthalate 8270E 3550 171 330 1,600,000 130,000 --------
Diphenylamine 8270E 3550 81 330 16,000,000 1,300,000 --------
Fluoranthene 8270E 3550 166 660 6,000,000 480,000 --------
Fluorene 8270E 3550 198 660 6,000,000 480,000 --------
Hexachlorobenzene 8270E 3550 145 660 990 220 --------
Hexachlorobutadiene 8270E 3550 149 660 5,600 1,300 --------
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene 8270E 3550 227 660 1,600 380 --------
Hexachloroethane 8270E 3550 120 660 8,500 1,900 --------
S:\AAA-Master Projects\PTRC\PTR002\Thomasville Furniture Plant B Site\Site-Specific QAPP\Tables10/7/2019
Table 4 (Page 4 of 12)
Hart & Hickman, PC
Table 4 (Page 5 of 12)
Analytical Sensitivity and Project Criteria
Thomasville Plant B
310 Fisher Ferry Street
Thomasville, North Carolina
H&H Job No. PTR-002
Industrial
PSRGs1
Residential
PSRGs2 2L Standards3 Non-Residential
GWSLs4
Residential
GWSLs5 2B Standards6Primary Compounds of Concern Analytical
Method
Extraction/
Digestion
Method
Method
Detection Limit Reporting Limit
Project Criteria
SVOCs (soil & sediment only)µg/kg µg/kg µg/kg µg/kg
Indeno (1,2,3-c,d) pyrene 8270E 3550 120 660 21,000 1,100 --------
Isophorone 8270E 3550 142 660 2,400,000 570,000 --------
Naphthalene 8270E 3550 131 660 18,000 4,100 --------
Nitrobenzene 8270E 3550 140 330 24,000 5,500 --------
N-Nitroso-dimethyl amine 8270E 3550 126 330 NE NE --------
N-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine 8270E 3550 152 660 330 78 --------
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine 8270E 3550 181 660 470,000 110,000 --------
N-Nitrosomorpholine 8270E 3550 34 330 340 81 --------
n-Octadecane 8270E 3550 171 500 NE NE --------
Pentachlorophenol 8270E 3550 421 1000 NE NE --------
Phenanthrene 8270E 3550 171 660 NE NE --------
Phenol 8270E 3550 108 660 49,000,000 3,800,000 --------
Pyrene 8270E 3550 152 660 4,500,000 360,000 --------
Pyridine 8270E 3550 63 330 230,000 16,000 --------
a-Terpineol 8270E 3550 22 330 NE NE --------
RCRA Metals (soil & sediment only)mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg
Arsenic 6020B 3050 0.00034 0.001 3 0.68 --------
Barium 6020B 3050 0.0032 0.01 47,000 3,100 --------
Cadmium 6020B 3050 0.00022 0.001 200 14 --------
Chromium 6020B 3050 0.0009 0.003 6.5 0.31 --------
Hexavalent Chromium 7199 3060 0.042 0.40 0.31 6.5 --------
Lead 6020B 3050 0.00044 0.001 800 250/400 --------
Mercury 7471B NA 0.000017 0.00005 9.7 2.3 --------
Selenium 6020B 3050 0.00098 0.005 1,200 78 --------
Silver 6020B 3050 0.00034 0.001 1,200 78 --------
S:\AAA-Master Projects\PTRC\PTR002\Thomasville Furniture Plant B Site\Site-Specific QAPP\Tables10/7/2019
Table 4 (Page 5 of 12)
Hart & Hickman, PC
Table 4 (Page 6 of 12)
Analytical Sensitivity and Project Criteria
Thomasville Plant B
310 Fisher Ferry Street
Thomasville, North Carolina
H&H Job No. PTR-002
Industrial
PSRGs1
Residential
PSRGs2 2L Standards3 Non-Residential
GWSLs4
Residential
GWSLs5 2B Standards6
Primary Compounds of Concern Analytical
Method
Extraction/
Digestion
Method
Method
Detection Limit Reporting Limit
Project Criteria
VOCs (water only)µg/L µg/L µg/L µg/L µg/L µg/L
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 8260 5030 0.35 1 ----NE NE NE NE
1,1,1-Trichloroethane 8260 5030 0.31 1 ----200 6,200 1,500 NE
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 8260 5030 0.34 1 ----NE NE NE 4
1,1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-trifluoroethane 8260 5030 0.68 5 ----200,000 200 48 NE
1,1,2-Trichloroethane 8260 5030 0.42 1 ----NE 5.20 1.20 NE
1,1-Dichloroethane 8260 5030 0.29 1 ----6 330 76.0 NE
1,1-Dichloroethene 8260 5030 0.35 1 ----350 160 39.0 NE
1,1-Dichloropropene 8260 5030 0.37 1 ----NE NE NE NE
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene 8260 5030 0.37 1 ----NE NE NE NE
1,2,3-Trichloropropane 8260 5030 0.34 1 ----0.005 19.0 4.50 NE
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 8260 5030 0.44 1 ----70 30.0 7.20 NE
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 8260 5030 0.34 1 ----400 210.0 50.0 NE
1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane 8260 5030 0.6 2 ----0.04 3.40 0.280 NE
1,2-Dibromoethane 8260 5030 0.37 1 ----NE 7.70 1.80 NE
1,2-Dichlorobenzene 8260 5030 0.27 1 ----20 2,200 530 NE
1,2-Dichloroethane 8260 5030 0.41 1 ----0.4 98.0 22.0 NE
1,2-Dichloropropane 8260 5030 0.29 1 ----0.6 30.0 7.20 NE
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 8260 5030 0.26 1 ----400 150 35 NE
1,3-Dichlorobenzene 8260 5030 0.40 1 ----200 NE NE NE
1,3-Dichloropropane 8260 5030 0.40 1 ----NE NE NE NE
1,4-Dichlorobenzene 8260 5030 0.42 1 ----6 110 26.0 NE
1,4-Dichlorobutane 8260 5030 0.41 1 ----NE NE NE NE
1,4-Dioxane 8260 5030 0 3 ----3 130,000 29,000 NE
2,2-Dichloropropane 8260 5030 0.26 1 ----NE NE NE NE
2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether 8260 5030 0.8 2 ----NE NE NE NE
2-Chlorotoluene 8260 5030 0.36 1 ----100 NE NE NE
3,3-dimethyl-1-butanol 8260 5030 0.63 10 ----NE NE NE NE
4-Chlorotoluene 8260 5030 0.32 1 ----24 NE NE NE
4-Isopropyltoluene 8260 5030 0.1 1 ----25 NE NE NE
Acetone 8260 5030 0.7 2 ----6,000 19,000,000 4,500,000 NE
Acetonitrile 8260 5030 3.0 10 ----NE 37,000 8,900 NE
Acrolein 8260 5030 1.20 100 ----4 3.50 0.840 NE
Acrylonitrile 8260 5030 0.85 100 ----NE 310 73.0 NE
Allyl Chloride 8260 5030 0.75 10 ----NE 1.90 0.460 NE
Benzene 8260 5030 0.34 1 ----1 69.0 16.0 51
Bromobenzene 8260 5030 0.45 1 ----NE 520 120 NE
Bromochloromethane 8260 5030 0.5 2 ----NE 590 140 NE
Bromodichloromethane 8260 5030 0.29 1 ----0.6 38.0 8.80 NE
Bromoform 8260 5030 0.26 1 ----4 5,100 1,200 NE
Bromomethane 8260 5030 0.48 1 ----10 NE NE NE
S:\AAA-Master Projects\PTRC\PTR002\Thomasville Furniture Plant B Site\Site-Specific QAPP\Tables10/7/2019
Table 4 (Page 6 of 12)
Hart & Hickman, PC
Table 4 (Page 7 of 12)
Analytical Sensitivity and Project Criteria
Thomasville Plant B
310 Fisher Ferry Street
Thomasville, North Carolina
H&H Job No. PTR-002
Industrial
PSRGs1
Residential
PSRGs2 2L Standards3 Non-Residential
GWSLs4
Residential
GWSLs5 2B Standards6
Primary Compounds of Concern Analytical
Method
Extraction/
Digestion
Method
Method
Detection Limit Reporting Limit
Project Criteria
VOCs (water only)µg/L µg/L µg/L µg/L µg/L µg/L
Carbon Disulfide 8260 5030 0.4 1 ----700 1,000 250 NE
Carbon Tetrachloride 8260 5030 0.55 2 ----0.3 18.0 4.10 1.6
Chlorobenzene 8260 5030 0.3 1 ----50 340 82.0 NE
Chloroethane 8260 5030 0.43 1 ----3,000 NE NE NE
Chloroform 8260 5030 0.48 1 ----70 36.0 8.10 NE
Chloromethane 8260 5030 0.3 1 ----3 220 52.0 NE
Chloroprene 8260 5030 0.86 10 ----NE NE NE NE
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 8260 5030 0.40 1 ----70 NE NE NE
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 8260 5030 0.36 1 ----0.4 NE NE NE
Cyclohexane 8260 5030 0.33 1 ----NE 860 200 NE
Dibromochloromethane 8260 5030 0.06 1 ----0.4 100 25.0 NE
Dibromomethane 8260 5030 0.54 2 ----70 NE NE NE
Dichlorodifluoromethane 8260 5030 0.47 5 ----1,000 6.20 2 NE
Epichlorohydrin 8260 5030 0.46 50 ----4 700 170 NE
Ethanol 8260 5030 13.00 100 ----4,000 NE NE NE
Ethyl Methacrylate 8260 5030 0.26 10 ----NE 11,000 2,700 NE
Ethylbenzene 8260 5030 0.3 1 ----600 150 35.0 NE
Heptane 8260 5030 0.36 1 ----400 4 1.0 NE
Hexachlorobutadiene 8260 5030 0.2 1 ----0.4 8 2 18
Hexane 8260 5030 0.76 10 ----400 NE NE NE
Isobutyl alcohol 8260 5030 5.0 10 ----NE NE NE NE
Isopropyl ether 8260 5030 0.41 1 ----70 NE NE NE
Isopropylbenzene 8260 5030 0.33 1 ----70 300 71 NE
m,p-Xylenes 8260 5030 0.73 2 ----500 NE NE NE
Methacrylonitrile 8260 5030 0.57 10 ----NE 2,600 620 NE
Methyl acetate 8260 5030 0.40 1 ----NE NE NE NE
Methyl butyl ketone 8260 5030 0.07 5 ----NE NE NE NE
Methyl cyclohexane 8260 5030 0.49 5 ----NE NE NE NE
Methyl ethyl ketone 8260 5030 0.78 5 ----4,000 1,900,000 450,000 NE
Methyl Iodide 8260 5030 0.41 5 ----NE NE NE NE
Methyl isobutyl ketone 8260 5030 0.40 5 ----100 470,000 110,000 NE
Methyl methacrylate 8260 5030 0.27 10 ----25 47,000 11,000 NE
Methylene Chloride 8260 5030 0.39 2 ----5 4,000 940 NE
Methyl-tert-butyl ether 8260 5030 0.32 1 ----20 20,000 4,500 NE
Naphthalene 8260 5030 0.45 1 ----6 150 35.0 NE
n-Butylbenzene 8260 5030 0.34 1 ----70 NE NE NE
n-Propylbenzene 8260 5030 0.36 1 ----70 NE NE NE
o-Xylene 8260 5030 0.40 1 ----500 410 98.0 NE
Pentachloroethane 8260 5030 1.4 10 ----NE NE NE NE
Propionitrile 8260 5030 2.10 10 ----NE NE NE NE
S:\AAA-Master Projects\PTRC\PTR002\Thomasville Furniture Plant B Site\Site-Specific QAPP\Tables10/7/2019
Table 4 (Page 7 of 12)
Hart & Hickman, PC
Table 4 (Page 8 of 12)
Analytical Sensitivity and Project Criteria
Thomasville Plant B
310 Fisher Ferry Street
Thomasville, North Carolina
H&H Job No. PTR-002
Industrial
PSRGs1
Residential
PSRGs2 2L Standards3 Non-Residential
GWSLs4
Residential
GWSLs5 2B Standards6Primary Compounds of Concern Analytical
Method
Extraction/
Digestion
Method
Method
Detection Limit Reporting Limit
Project Criteria
VOCs (water only)µg/L µg/L µg/L µg/L µg/L µg/L
sec-Butylbenzene 8260 5030 0.38 1 ----70 NE NE NE
Styrene 8260 5030 0.26 1 ----70 7,800 1,900 NE
tert-Amyl Alcohol 8260 5030 0.47 1 ----NE 4,700 1,100 NE
tert-Amyl Ethyl ether 8260 5030 0.62 2 ----NE NE NE NE
tert-Amyl Methyl Ether 8260 5030 0.82 2 ----128 NE NE NE
tert-Butyl Alcohol 8260 5030 1.10 10 ----NE NE NE NE
tert-Butylbenzene 8260 5030 0.34 1 ----70 NE NE NE
tert-Butyl Ethyl Ether 8260 5030 0.62 2 ----NE NE NE NE
tert-Butyl Alcohol 8260 5030 1.10 10 ----NE NE NE NE
tert-Butyl Formate 8260 5030 1.20 10 ----NE NE NE NE
Tetrachloroethene 8260 5030 0.31 1 ----0.7 48.0 12.0 3.3
Tetrahydrofuran 8260 5030 0.68 2 ----NE 610,000 140,000 NE
Toluene 8260 5030 0.35 1 ----600 16,000 3,800 11
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 8260 5030 0.37 1 ----100 NE NE NE
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 8260 5030 0.49 1 ----0.4 NE NE NE
trans-1,4-Dichloro-2-butene 8260 5030 0.22 1 ----NE 1.10 0.250 NE
Trichloroethene 8260 5030 0.46 2 ----3 4.40 1.00 30
Trichlorofluoromethane 8260 5030 0.23 1 ----2,000 NE NE NE
Vinyl acetate 8260 5030 0.26 1 ----NE 8,400 2,000 NE
Vinyl Chloride 8260 5030 0.41 2 ----0.03 25.0 1.50 2.4
SVOCs (water only)µg/L µg/L µg/L µg/L µg/L µg/L
1,1-Biphenyl 8270E 3520 0.81 10 ----NE 6.6 28 NE
1,2,4,5-Tetrachlorobenzene 8270E 3520 1.1 10 ----2 NE NE NE
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 8270E 3520 4.0 10 ----70 30 7.2 NE
1,2-Dichlorobenzene 8270E 3520 4.0 10 ----20 2200 530 NE
1,2-Diphenylhydrazine 8270E 3520 2.9 10 ----NE NE NE NE
1,3,5-Trinitrobenzene 8270E 3520 1.5 10 ----NE NE NE NE
1,3-Dichlorobenzene 8270E 3520 3.9 10 ----200 NE NE NE
1,3-Dinitrobenzene 8270E 3520 2.8 10 ----NE NE NE NE
1,4-Dichlorobenzene 8270E 3520 4.1 10 ----6 NE NE NE
1,4-Dioxane 8270E 3520 2.0 10 ----3 130000 29000 NE
1,4-Diphenylenediamine 8270E 3520 1.1 10 ----NE NE NE NE
1,4-Napthaquinone 8270E 3520 1.2 10 ----NE NE NE NE
1-Chloronaphthalene 8270E 3520 0.98 10 ----NE NE NE NE
1-Methylnaphthalene 8270E 3520 4.3 10 ----1 NE NE NE
1-Methylphenanthrene 8270E 3520 1.80 10 ----NE NE NE NE
1-Napthylamine 8270E 3520 2.8 10 ----NE NE NE NE
2,3,4,6-Tetrachlorophenol 8270E 3520 4.0 10 ----200 NE NE NE
2,3-Dichloroanaline 8270E 3520 3.8 10 ----NE NE NE NE
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol 8270E 3520 3.6 20 ----63 NE NE NE
S:\AAA-Master Projects\PTRC\PTR002\Thomasville Furniture Plant B Site\Site-Specific QAPP\Tables10/7/2019
Table 4 (Page 8 of 12)
Hart & Hickman, PC
Table 4 (Page 9 of 12)
Analytical Sensitivity and Project Criteria
Thomasville Plant B
310 Fisher Ferry Street
Thomasville, North Carolina
H&H Job No. PTR-002
Industrial
PSRGs1
Residential
PSRGs2 2L Standards3 Non-Residential
GWSLs4
Residential
GWSLs5 2B Standards6Primary Compounds of Concern Analytical
Method
Extraction/
Digestion
Method
Method
Detection Limit Reporting Limit
Project Criteria
SVOCs (water only)µg/L µg/L µg/L µg/L µg/L µg/L
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol 8270E 3520 4.5 20 ----4 NE NE NE
2,4-Dichlorophenol 8270E 3520 2.6 10 ----0.98 NE NE NE
2,4-Dimethylphenol 8270E 3520 4.9 10 ----100 NE NE NE
2,4-Dinitrophenol 8270E 3520 11.8 50 ----NE NE NE NE
2,4-Dinitrotoluene 8270E 3520 4.2 10 ----0.1 NE NE NE
2,6-Dichlorophenol 8270E 3520 3.9 20 ----NE NE NE NE
2,6-Dinitrotoluene 8270E 3520 3.9 20 ----NE NE NE NE
2-Acetylaminofluorene 8270E 3520 0.5 10 ----NE NE NE NE
2-Chloronaphthalene 8270E 3520 4.7 20 ----NE NE NE NE
2-Chlorophenol 8270E 3520 2.7 10 ----0.4 NE NE NE
2-Methylnaphthalene 8270E 3520 4.2 10 ----30 NE NE NE
2-Methylphenol 8270E 3520 2.4 10 ----400 NE NE NE
2-Napthylamine 8270E 3520 1.0 10 ----NE NE NE NE
2-Nitroaniline 8270E 3520 4.1 10 ----NE NE NE NE
2-Nitrophenol 8270E 3520 2.6 10 ----NE NE NE NE
2-Picoline 8270E 3520 2.2 10 ----NE NE NE NE
3&4-Methylphenol 8270E 3520 2.5 10 ----40 NE NE NE
3,3’-Dimethylbenzidine 8270E 3520 5.60 10 ----NE NE NE NE
3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine 8270E 3520 3.90 10 ----NE NE NE NE
3,4-Dimethylphenol 8270E 3520 2.7 10 ----100 NE NE NE
3-Methylcholanthrene 8270E 3520 0.4 10 ----NE NE NE NE
3-Nitroaniline 8270E 3520 3.8 10 ----NE NE NE NE
4,6-Dinitro-2-methyl phenol 8270E 3520 11.30 50 ----NE NE NE NE
4-Aminobiphenyl 8270E 3520 1.4 10 ----NE NE NE NE
4-Bromophenyl-phenyl ether 8270E 3520 4.4 20 ----NE NE NE NE
4-Chloro-3-Methylphenol 8270E 3520 2.9 10 ----NE NE NE NE
4-Chloroanailine 8270E 3520 3.5 10 ----NE NE NE NE
4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether 8270E 3520 4.70 20 ----NE NE NE NE
4-Nitroaniline 8270E 3520 4.1 10 ----NE NE NE NE
4-Nitrophenol 8270E 3520 2.6 10 ----40 NE NE NE
4-Nitroquinoline-1-oxide 8270E 3520 0.53 10 ----NE NE NE NE
5-Nitro-o-toluidine 8270E 3520 1.0 10 ----NE NE NE NE
7,12-Dimethylbenz(a)anthracene 8270E 3520 0.7 10 ----NE NE NE NE
a,a-Dimethylphenthylamine 8270E 3520 2.6 20 ----NE NE NE NE
Acenaphthene 8270E 3520 4.2 10 ----80 NE NE NE
Acenaphthylene 8270E 3520 4.4 20 ----200 NE NE NE
Acetophenone 8270E 3520 3.4 20 ----700 NE NE NE
Aniline 8270E 3520 4.6 20 ----NE NE NE NE
Anthracene 8270E 3520 4.6 10 ----2,000 NE NE NE
Aramite 8270E 3520 1.5 10 ----NE NE NE NE
S:\AAA-Master Projects\PTRC\PTR002\Thomasville Furniture Plant B Site\Site-Specific QAPP\Tables10/7/2019
Table 4 (Page 9 of 12)
Hart & Hickman, PC
Table 4 (Page 10 of 12)
Analytical Sensitivity and Project Criteria
Thomasville Plant B
310 Fisher Ferry Street
Thomasville, North Carolina
H&H Job No. PTR-002
Industrial
PSRGs1
Residential
PSRGs2 2L Standards3 Non-Residential
GWSLs4
Residential
GWSLs5 2B Standards6Primary Compounds of Concern Analytical
Method
Extraction/
Digestion
Method
Method
Detection Limit Reporting Limit
Project Criteria
SVOCs (water only)µg/L µg/L µg/L µg/L µg/L µg/L
Atrazine 8270E 3520 1.1 10 ----3 NE NE NE
Azobenzene 8270E 3520 3.2 10 ----NE 7200 1600 NE
Benzaldehyde 8270E 3520 2.4 10 ----700 NE NE NE
Benzidine 8270E 3520 4.1 10 ----NE NE NE NE
Benzo (a) anthracene 8270E 3520 3.2 10 ----0.05 4200 340 0.0311*
Benzo (a) pyrene 8270E 3520 3.5 10 ----0.005 NE NE 0.0311*
Benzo (b) fluoranthene 8270E 3520 3.4 10 ----0.05 NE NE 0.0311*
Benzo (g,h,I) perylene 8270E 3520 3.6 10 ----200 NE NE NE
Benzo (k) fluoranthene 8270E 3520 2.6 10 ----0.5 NE NE 0.0311*
Benzoic Acid 8270E 3520 19.3 100 30,000 NE NE NE
Benzyl Alcohol 8270E 3520 2.5 10 ----700 NE NE NE
Bis(2-chloroethoxy) methane 8270E 3520 3.8 10 ----NE NE NE NE
Bis(2-chloroethyl) ether 8270E 3520 2.6 10 ----0.03 530 120 NE
Bis(2-chloroisopropyl) ether 8270E 3520 2.8 10 ----NE NE NE NE
Bis(2-Ethylhexyl) phthalate 8270E 3520 3.7 10 ----3 NE NE NE
Butyl benzyl phthalate 8270E 3520 2.9 10 ----1,000 NE NE NE
Caprolactam 8270E 3520 1.6 10 ----4,000 NE NE NE
Carbazole 8270E 3520 4.1 20 ----2 NE NE NE
Chlorobenzilate 8270E 3520 0.65 10 ----NE NE NE NE
Chrysene 8270E 3520 3.3 10 ----5 NE NE 0.0311*
n-Decane 8270E 3520 3.4 10 ----NE NE NE NE
Diallate 8270E 3520 1.1 10 ----NE NE NE NE
Dibenzo (a,h) anthracene 8270E 3520 5.7 20 ----0.005 NE NE 0.0311*
Dibenzofuran 8270E 3520 4.3 20 ----28 NE NE NE
Diethylphthalate 8270E 3520 4.2 20 ----6,000 NE NE NE
Dimethoate 8270E 3520 1.3 10 ----NE NE NE NE
Dimethylphthalate 8270E 3520 4.0 10 ----NE NE NE NE
Di-n-Butyl Phthalate 8270E 3520 4.3 10 ----NE NE NE NE
Di-n-octyl-phthalate 8270E 3520 4.5 10 ----NE NE NE NE
Dinoseb 8270E 3520 0.87 10 ----7 NE NE NE
Diphenylamine 8270E 3520 2.0 10 ----NE NE NE NE
Disulfoton 8270E 3520 1.8 10 ----0.3 NE NE NE
Ethylmethane sulfonate 8270E 3520 1.60 10 ----NE NE NE NE
Famphur 8270E 3520 2.0 20 ----NE NE NE NE
Fluoranthene 8270E 3520 4.0 10 ----300 NE NE NE
Fluorene 8270E 3520 5.0 10 ----300 NE NE NE
Hexachlorobenzene 8270E 3520 3.9 20 ----NE 3.8 0.88 NE
Hexachlorobutadiene 8270E 3520 4.5 20 ----0.4 13 3 18
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene 8270E 3520 7.3 20 ----NE 0.16 0.038 NE
Hexachloroethane 8270E 3520 3.7 10 ----NE 70 16 NE
S:\AAA-Master Projects\PTRC\PTR002\Thomasville Furniture Plant B Site\Site-Specific QAPP\Tables10/7/2019
Table 4 (Page 10 of 12)
Hart & Hickman, PC
Table 4 (Page 11 of 12)
Analytical Sensitivity and Project Criteria
Thomasville Plant B
310 Fisher Ferry Street
Thomasville, North Carolina
H&H Job No. PTR-002
Industrial
PSRGs1
Residential
PSRGs2 2L Standards3 Non-Residential
GWSLs4
Residential
GWSLs5 2B Standards6Primary Compounds of Concern Analytical
Method
Extraction/
Digestion
Method
Method
Detection Limit Reporting Limit
Project Criteria
SVOCs (water only)µg/L µg/L µg/L µg/L µg/L µg/L
Hexachloropropene 8270E 3520 1.7 10 ----NE NE NE NE
Indeno (1,2,3-c,d) pyrene 8270E 3520 2.6 10 ----0.05 NE NE 0.0311*
Isodrin 8270E 3520 1.4 10 ----NE NE NE NE
Isophorone 8270E 3520 4.1 10 ----40 NE NE NE
Isosafrole 8270E 3520 1 10 ----NE NE NE NE
Kepone 8270E 3520 1.6 20 ----NE NE NE NE
Methapyrilene 8270E 3520 5.0 50 ----NE NE NE NE
Methyl parathion 8270E 3520 1.0 10 ----NE NE NE NE
Methylmethane sulfonate 8270E 3520 1.1 20 ----NE NE NE NE
Naphthalene 8270E 3520 4.1 10 ----6 150 35 NE
Nitrobenzene 8270E 3520 3.8 10 ----NE 3,100 720 NE
N-Nitrosodibutylamine 8270E 3520 1.0 10 ----NE 140 33 NE
N-Nitrosodiethylamine 8270E 3520 2.1 10 ----NE NE NE NE
N-Nitroso-dimethyl amine 8270E 3520 1.3 10 ----0.0007 NE NE NE
N-Nitrosomethylethylamine 8270E 3520 1.8 10 ----NE NE NE NE
N-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine 8270E 3520 3.3 20 ----NE NE NE NE
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine 8270E 3520 4.4 20 ----NE NE NE NE
N-Nitrosomorpholine 8270E 3520 0.3 10 ----NE NE NE NE
N-Nitrosopiperidine 8270E 3520 1.3 10 ----NE NE NE NE
N-Nitrosopyrrolidine 8270E 3520 1.2 10 ----NE NE NE NE
o,o,o-Triethylphosphorthioate 8270E 3520 1.1 10 ----NE NE NE NE
o-Toluidine 8270E 3520 0.9 10 ----NE NE NE NE
Parathion 8270E 3520 1.20 10 ----NE NE NE 0.013
p-Benzoquinone 8270E 3520 1.9 10 ----NE NE NE NE
p-Dimethylaminoazobenzene 8270E 3520 0.7 10 ----NE NE NE NE
S:\AAA-Master Projects\PTRC\PTR002\Thomasville Furniture Plant B Site\Site-Specific QAPP\Tables10/7/2019
Table 4 (Page 11 of 12)
Hart & Hickman, PC
Table 4 (Page 12 of 12)
Analytical Sensitivity and Project Criteria
Thomasville Plant B
310 Fisher Ferry Street
Thomasville, North Carolina
H&H Job No. PTR-002
Industrial
PSRGs1
Residential
PSRGs2 2L Standards3 Non-Residential
GWSLs4
Residential
GWSLs5 2B Standards6Primary Compounds of Concern Analytical
Method
Extraction/
Digestion
Method
Method
Detection Limit Reporting Limit
Project Criteria
SVOCs (water only)µg/L µg/L µg/L µg/L µg/L µg/L
n-Octadecane 8270E 3520 3.7 10 ----NE NE NE NE
Pentachlorobenzene 8270E 3520 1.4 10 ----NE NE NE NE
Pentachloroethane 8270E 3520 2.1 10 ----NE NE NE NE
Pentachloronitrobenzene 8270E 3520 1.0 10 ----NE NE NE NE
Pentachlorophenol 8270E 3520 10.8 50 ----0.3 NE NE NE
Phenacetin 8270E 3520 1.1 10 ----NE NE NE NE
Phenanthrene 8270E 3520 3.9 10 ----200 NE NE NE
Phenol 8270E 3520 1.4 10 ----30 NE NE NE
Phorate 8270E 3520 1.5 10 ----1 NE NE NE
Pronamide 8270E 3520 0.4 10 ----NE NE NE NE
Pyrene 8270E 3520 3.5 10 ----200 NE NE NE
Pyridine 8270E 3520 1.6 10 ----NE NE NE NE
Safrole 8270E 3520 0.8 10 ----NE NE NE NE
Sulfotepp 8270E 3520 1.0 10 ----NE NE NE NE
a-Terpineol 8270E 3520 2.2 10 ----NE NE NE NE
Thionazin 8270E 3520 0.9 10 ----NE NE NE NE
RCRA Metals (water only)µg/L µg/L µg/L µg/L µg/L µg/L
Arsenic 6020B 3010 0.00036 0.0010 ----10 NE NE 10
Barium 6020B 3010 0.00034 0.010 ----700 NE NE NE
Cadmium 6020B 3010 0.000097 0.0005 ----2 NE NE calculated**
Chromium 6020B 3010 0.00026 0.0010 ----10 NE NE calculated**
Lead 6020B 3010 0.00019 0.0010 ----15 NE NE calculated**
Mercury 7470A NA 0.16 0.5 ----1 0.750 0.180 0.012
Selenium 6020B 3010 0.00027 0.0010 ----20 NE NE 5
Silver 6020B 3010 0.00012 0.0005 ----20 NE NE calculated**/0.06
Hardness (surface water only)mg/L mg/L
Hardness (Titration)2340C NA 0.57 5.0 ----------NE
Notes:
1) Analytical results compared to NC Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) Inactive Hazardous Sites Branch (IHSB) Industrial Health-Based Preliminary
Soil Remediation Goals (PSRGs), revised May 2019
2) Analytical results compared to NC DEQ IHSB Residential Health-Based PSRGs, revised May 2019
3) Analytical results compared to NCAC 15A 2L Groundwater Quality Standards, revised April 20124) Analytical results compared to DEQ Division of Waste Management (DWM) Non-Residential Vapor Intrusion Screening Levels (VISLs), Groundwater Screening Levels
(GWSLs), revised February 2018
5) Analytical results compared to DENR DWM Residential VISLs, GWSLs, revised February 2018
6) Analytical results compared to NCAC 15A 2B Surface Water Quality Standards, dated June 2019
VOCs = volatile organic compounds; SVOCs = semi-volatile organic compoundsRCRA = Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
Soil and water information is specific to Prism Laboratories, Inc. (Prism) and their defined subcontractors.
For additional QA/QC requirements and laboratory procedures for additional compounds refer to the Prism QAP in Appendix C of the Generic QAPP.
NE = standard not established; -- = not applicable
* = For 2B Standards, specific PAHs should be summed and their total compared to the listed regualtory guideline.** = Standard is hardness-dependent and must be calculated.
S:\AAA-Master Projects\PTRC\PTR002\Thomasville Furniture Plant B Site\Site-Specific QAPP\Tables10/7/2019
Table 4 (Page 12 of 12)
Hart & Hickman, PC

Figures
SITE LOCATION MAP
THOMASVILLE PLANT B310 FISHER FERRY STREETTHOMASVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA
DATE:
JOB NO:
REVISION NO:
FIGURE NO:
8/6/2019 0
1PTR-002-5
0 2000 4000
APPROXIMATE
SCALE IN FEET
N
U.S.G.S. QUADRANGLE MAP
7.5 MINUTE SERIES (TOPOGRAPHIC)
3921 Sunset Ridge Road, Suite 301
Raleigh, North Carolina 27607919.847.4241(p) 919.847.4261(f)License # C-1269 / # C-245 GeologyHIGH POINT WEST, NORTH CAROLINA 1993
SITE
REVISION NO. 0
JOB NO. PTR-002
DATE: 10-30-19
FIGURE NO. 2
THOMASVILLE PLANT B
310 FISHER FERRY STREET
THOMASVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA
SITE MAP
LEGEND
BROWNFIELDS PROPERTY BOUNDARY
PARCEL BOUNDARY
NORTH HAMBY CREEK
DIRECTION OF STREAM FLOW
FORMER BUILDING FOOTPRINT
FORMER ELEVATOR
3921 Sunset Ridge Road, Suite 301
Raleigh, North Carolina 27607
919-847-4241(p) 919-847-4261(f)
License # C-1269 / #C-245 Geology
NORTH

H
A
M
B
Y

C
R
E
E
K
FOSTE
R

S
T
R
E
E
T
CARMALT STREETWAGSTAFF STREETFISHE
R F
E
R
R
Y
ST
REET
AMAZON STREET
W. COLO
N
I
A
L

D
R
I
V
E
WALNUT STREET
DAVIDSON COUNTY
SHERIFF DEPARTMENT
(211 W. COLONIAL DRIVE)
RESIDENTIAL
RESIDENTIAL
VACANT
LAND
RESIDENTIAL
RESIDENTIAL
NOTES:
1.AERIAL IMAGERY OBTAINED FROM GOOGLE
EARTH (2019).
PINE STREET
S:\AAA-Master Projects\PTRC\PTR002\Thomasville Furniture Plant B Site\Figures\Site Map_R1.dwg, FIG 2, 11/1/2019 8:52:11 AM, sperry
FORMER STORAGE
BUILDING (AOC-7)
AREA OF VISIBLE STAINING
FROM OVERTURNED 5
GALLON BUCKETS (AOC-10)
FORMER HISTORICAL LAUNDRY
COMPANY (1948) AND CHEMICAL
MIXING COMPANY (1963) (AOC-13)
FORMER BOILER ROOM
FORMER LOADING SHED
FORMER PUMP HOUSE
FORMER STANDARD OIL COMPANY
FILLING STATION AND MACHINE SHOP
(1923-1948) (AOC-13)
FORMER KEROSENE TANK
15,000 GAL. (AOC-13)
FORMER GASOLINE TANKS
15,000 GAL. (AOC-13)
FORMER LUMBER SHED
AND GENERAL LOCATION
OF FORMER VENEER
FACILITY
FORMER UNKNOWN
STRUCTURE
FORMER LUMBER
SHED
FORMER
COOLING
SHEDS
5 FORMER
DRYING K
I
L
N
S
LUMBER
FORMER BOILER
ROOM (AOC-3)
FORMER
GENERAL
STORAGE
VISIBLE PETROLEUM STAINING
OBSERVED, POSSIBLE AST
LOCATION (AOC-7)
LOCATION OF HISTORIC
GAS TANK (1930 AND
1948) (AOC-13)
ASPHALT
PARKING
FORMER SCAFFOLDING WITH
PIPES LEADING INTO BUILDING,
POSSIBLE AST LOCATION (AOC-8)
FORMER 10,000
GALLON WATER
TOWER
LARGE CONCRETE
BASIN (AOC-2)
FORMER
WOOD
WORKSFORMER PAINT
STORAGE
BUILDING
WOOD ST
O
R
A
G
E

B
U
I
L
D
I
N
G
FORMER
DRYING
ROOM
FORMER
PACKAGING
AND FINISHING
FORMER STORAGE
AND SHIPPING (AOC-7)
POSSIBLE LEACH
FIELD AREA
(AOC-6)
AREA OF STRESSED
VEGETATION NEAR
CREEK (AOC-9)
SUMP WITH UNDERGROUND
PIPE LEADING TO CREEK
(AOC-6)
STAINING IN BASEMENT,
POSSIBLE FUEL LINE COMING
INTO BUILDING (AOC-1)FORMER LUNCH
ROOM BUILDING
UNDERGROUND PIPE EXPOSED
ON SOUTHERN BANK OF NORTH
HAMBY CREEK (AOC-5)
FORMER PLATFORM
WITH PIPING, POSSIBLE
AST LOCATION (AOC-8)
2ND FLOOR HAZARDOUS WASTE
SATELLITE COLLECTION FOR
SPENT SOLVENTS
LOCATION OF HISTORIC
GAS TANK (1930 AND
1948) (AOC-13)
FORMER STORAGE
AREA (AOC-7)
FORMER SPRAY
BOOTH (AOC-4)
FORMER SPRAY BOOTH
AND OFFICES (AOC-4)REVISION NO. 0
JOB NO. PTR-002
DATE: 10-30-19
FIGURE NO. 3
THOMASVILLE PLANT B
310 FISHER FERRY STREET
THOMASVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA
PROPOSED SAMPLING LOCATIONS
LEGEND
BROWNFIELDS PROPERTY BOUNDARY
PARCEL BOUNDARY
NORTH HAMBY CREEK
DIRECTION OF STREAM FLOW
FORMER BUILDING FOOTPRINT
FORMER ELEVATOR (AOC-11)
PROPOSED TEMPORARY MONITORING WELL
LOCATION
PROPOSED COMPOSITE SOIL SAMPLE
LOCATION
PROPOSED SOIL SAMPLE LOCATION
PROPOSED SURFACE WATER/SEDIMENT
SAMPLE LOCATION
PROPOSED BACKGROUND SOIL SAMPLE
LOCATION
3921 Sunset Ridge Road, Suite 301
Raleigh, North Carolina 27607
919-847-4241(p) 919-847-4261(f)
License # C-1269 / #C-245 Geology
NORTH H
A
M
B
Y

C
R
E
E
K
FOSTE
R

S
T
R
E
E
T
WAGSTAFF STREETFISHE
R FE
RR
Y ST
R
EET
TMW-2
TMW-5
TMW-3
TMW-6
TMW-1
TMW-4
SB-4
SB-1
SB-2
BG-1
BG-2
SB-9
SW/SED-1
SW/SED-2
SW/SED-3
SW/SED-4
SB-10
SB-3 SB-6
SB-7
SB-8
SB-5
S:\AAA-Master Projects\PTRC\PTR002\Thomasville Furniture Plant B Site\Figures\Site Map_R1.dwg, FIG 3, 11/1/2019 8:52:22 AM, sperry

Appendix A
Project Organization Chart

Appendix A – Project Organization Chart
Site Specific QAPP Addendum 310 Fisher Ferry Street
Thomasville, North Carolina

*To Be Determined
USEPA Region 4 Brownfields Project Officer
Ms. Cindy Nolan
[phone]
Cody J. Cannon- NCDEQ
Brownfields Program
Coordinator [phone]

PTRC Program
Administrator
Mr. Jesse Day [phone]
Justin Ballard, PG,
QA/QC Officer
[phone]

Leonard Moretz, PG, RSM;
Project Manager/ Technical
Leader
[phone]
Robert Harrell
Project Coordinator
[phone]

Environmental Drilling Contractor*
Hart & Hickman QA
Manager’s Designated
Reviewer
Prism Laboratories, Inc.
Ms. Robbie Jones
President [phone]
Prism Laboratories, Inc.
Ms. Angela Overcash
Project Manager
[phone]
Hart & Hickman
Field Team Leader*
Prism Laboratories, Inc.
Mr. Paul Fitzgerald
QA Officer
[phone]
The QA Manager has independent authority and is separate from those who generate the data. USEPA Region 4 Quality
Assurance Manager’s
Designated Approving Official

Appendix B
Health and Safety Plan

Emergency Contact Information for
Thomasville Plant B
1
S:\AAA-Master Projects\PTRC\PTR002\Thomasville Furniture Plant B Site\Site-Specific QAPP\HASP - Thomasville Plant B.docx October 7, 2019
EMERGENCY CONTACT INFORMATION Thomasville Plant B
310 Fisher Ferry Street, Thomasville, NC H&H Job No. PTR-002 October 7, 2019 Emergency Response
(1) Hospital: (i.e., address and telephone number). Attach Hospital Route Map or Directions
Novant Health Thomasville Medical Center, 207 Old Lexington Road, Thomasville, NC [phone] (See attached map).

In the event of an emergency situation on the site, personnel are to immediately notify the appropriate emergency responder (i.e., fire, rescue, police, etc.), and to take any corrective actions or emergency procedures that can be safely performed (i.e., first-aid, CPR, etc.) When conditions permit, onsite personnel must notify the H&H Project Manager and Health & Safety Officer that an incident has occurred. Onsite personnel should review and be familiar with the phone number and location of the nearest hospital (listed above).
(2) On-site emergency contact person and telephone number:
City Manager for the City of Thomasville – W. Kelly Craver [phone] (3) Other emergency contacts as appropriate: (i.e., fire, ambulance, 911, etc.)
• Ambulance, Fire, & Police - 911
• Poison Control – [phone]
• H&H Project Manager – Justin Ballard – [phone]
• H&H Field Staff – Lisa Nickels – [phone]
• Shannon Cottrill, Health & Safety Officer [phone] (cell)
• Kasey Wattley, Health & Safety Manager [phone] (cell)

Health & Safety Plan for
Thomasville Plant B
2
S:\AAA-Master Projects\PTRC\PTR002\Thomasville Furniture Plant B Site\Site-Specific QAPP\HASP - Thomasville Plant B.docx October 7, 2019
Site History (Describe what is known about the site. i.e., type of facility, operations, chemicals, etc.).
H&H is under contract to perform assessment activities at the former Thomasville Plant B facility located
at 310 Fisher Ferry Street in Thomasville, NC. The Site consists of one parcel of land that is
approximately 11.53 acres. The Site was formerly improved with 13 industrial buildings
totaling 206,000 square feet. All of the buildings were demolished in 2017-2018. The Site was formerly utilized as a furniture manufacturing plant. There is the potential for volatile organic vapors (VOCs), semi-volatile organic vapors (SVOCs), and
metals to have formerly been used at the site. Contaminants of concern will be identified for the site following initial assessment activities.
H&H is conducting Phase II assessment activities to assess the potential for soil and groundwater to have been impacted by former furniture manufacturing activities.
Scope of Work (Describe task(s) to be performed).
The scope of work (SOW) for activities that may be performed at the site by H&H personnel includes the following:
• H&H personnel will perform work while donning appropriate personal protective equipment
(PPE).
• Utilize a private utility locator to mark underground utilities in the areas of the proposed borings.
Additionally, 811 will be called so the major utility companies can mark their utilities in the area.
• Oversee/perform soil borings, install temporary/permanent groundwater monitoring wells, and
abandon monitoring wells. Soil borings will be performed using a hand auger prior to drilling.
• H&H will collect soil/sediment/groundwater/surface water samples following H&H standard
field procedures unless otherwise specified in the workplan.

Health & Safety Plan for
Thomasville Plant B
3
S:\AAA-Master Projects\PTRC\PTR002\Thomasville Furniture Plant B Site\Site-Specific QAPP\HASP - Thomasville Plant B.docx October 7, 2019
Potential Hazards (List known or suspected hazards present on-site and preventative measures. Refer to Job Safety Analysis files for reference/assistance).
(1) Physical Hazards (i.e., fire, explosion, traffic, slips, trips, and falls, etc.).
Task Physical Hazards Action for hazard prevention Potential for Exposure to Hazard Working near drilling equipment Pinch points, noise, falling items, being struck by large, moving equipment
Discuss pinch points during kickoff meeting, ear plugs, hard hat, safety vest
Medium
Soil/Sediment Sampling Contact with sharps (broken glass ware) Cut-resistant gloves and prompt clean-up of broken glass ware
Low
Water Sampling Contact with sharps (broken glass ware) Cut-resistant gloves and prompt clean-up of broken glass ware
Low
Lifting Muscle strain, dropping heavy items Utilize appropriate lifting techniques (bend at legs), utilize team-lift strategy, steel-toed boots
Medium
(2) Chemical Hazards (i.e., chemicals or products stored on-site).
• Chlorinated volatile organic compounds (VOCs)and/or aromatic compounds may be present in soil, groundwater, and/or soil gas at the site.
Task Chemical Hazards Action for hazard prevention Potential for Exposure to Hazard
Water sampling VOCs or SVOCs
and elevated metals
Don nitrile gloves when contacting
groundwater/surfacewater at the Site.
Medium
Soil/Sediment sampling VOCs or SVOCs and elevated metals
Don nitrile gloves when contacting soil at the Site. Medium
(3) Biological Hazards (i.e., toxic insects, poisonous plants, and poisonous snakes).
• Fire ants, ticks, snakes, bees/wasp, poisonous plants
(4) Other Hazards (i.e., high winds, thunderstorms, hail, lightning, snow, and ice.)
Pedestrian and vehicle traffic is possible in parking areas during work activities.

Health & Safety Plan for
Thomasville Plant B
4
S:\AAA-Master Projects\PTRC\PTR002\Thomasville Furniture Plant B Site\Site-Specific QAPP\HASP - Thomasville Plant B.docx October 7, 2019
Training
(1) Minimum Training Required (Review site specific information prior to entering the site).
• 40-hour OSHA HAZWOPER training
• 8-hour OSHA HAZWOPER supervisor training (if required)
• Medical Monitoring Program Participant
(2) Specialized Training or Required Permits (i.e., site specific, or special permits may be necessary).
• The NC One Call 811 and a private utility locator will provide utility location services to identify subsurface utilities during drilling and/or excavation activities.
Personal Protective Equipment (PPE)
(1) PPE Required: (examples: hard hat, safety glasses with side shields, steel toe boots, Tyvek coveralls, respirator, rubber boots, gloves, etc.).
The following PPE will be required during the performance of site activities: Safety glasses At all times during the performance of site work, regardless of the task Safety shoes/boots At all times during the performance of site work, regardless of the task Traffic safety vest At any time where work is performed in areas of vehicular traffic and heavy equipment, or within 25 ft of such an area Hearing Protection At any time where noise levels are above natural ambient levels, at any time
when working within 25 ft of operational heavy equipment (i.e., excavators), and at any time when utilizing portable equipment which creates noise levels above natural ambient levels (i.e., drills, saws, etc) Leather work gloves At any time the use of hand protection is warranted, including but not limited to, operations involving the use of hand tools Nitrile gloves At any time environmental samples are to be collected or contaminated media
is being handled Hard hat At any time when working within 25ft of operational heavy equipment and when working within a space with limited overhead clearance and/or overhead obstructions Tyvek® coveralls At any time where dermal exposure to contaminants is imminent or assured, or where exposure to liquid or solid wastes is likely. The use of Tyvek® coveralls may require the modification of the PPE level established for the site Respirator At any time when volatile organic vapor measurements indicate levels at or in excess of the action level established for the site (see Exposure Monitoring below). When used, the appropriate respirator cartridge must be used (i.e., organic vapor). Consultation with the Project Manager and Health & Safety Officer is required prior to the use of a respirator. NOTE: EACH OR ANY COMBINATION OF EACH OF THESE FORMS OF PPE MUST BE UTILIZED IN ACCORDANCE WITH CLIENT SPECIFIC HEALTH AND SAFETY REQUIREMENTS, IF APPLICABLE.
Health & Safety Plan for
Thomasville Plant B
5
S:\AAA-Master Projects\PTRC\PTR002\Thomasville Furniture Plant B Site\Site-Specific QAPP\HASP - Thomasville Plant B.docx October 7, 2019
Exposure Monitoring (Describe exposure monitoring to be conducted).
During drilling and intrusive sampling activities, a PID/FID shall be utilized to monitor potential exposure to volatile organic vapors. Monitoring of potential volatile organic vapors will be conducted within the breathing zone (i.e., 4 to 6 ft above ground surface), and will be conducted periodically during each day. A minimum of a single measurement within the breathing zone in the work area(s) should be performed, and data obtained through the performance of this monitoring shall be recorded in the field book, noting the date, time, location and measurement obtained. More frequent vapor monitoring should be conducted as conditions warrant (i.e., recognition of offensive odors). As a PID detects numerous volatile organic vapors and is not specific to a particular compound, the action level for organic vapors as monitored with the PID at the site is established at a level of 1.0 parts per million (ppm), above background levels. This level is the acceptable OSHA time weighted average
(TWA) limit for vinyl chloride (NIOSH, Pocket Guide to Chemical Hazards, September 2005).
• If little to no work has been performed previously at the site use VC (TWA=1ppm).
• If more comprehensive site characterization info is available, and no VC is present, action level may be increased to match appropriate hazardous compound.
• If this level is observed or exceeded within the breathing zone for more than 1 minute, operations are to be suspended and personnel will move up wind of the work area until levels dissipate.
• If volatile organic vapor levels do not dissipate in the work area, contact the Project Manager and Health & Safety Officer, ventilation measures may be necessary in the work area and/or the
required PPE may be modified to include donning of an appropriate respirator.
Note: Calibration, frequency of calibration, and use of the PID must be performed in accordance with
the manufacturer’s specifications.

Health & Safety Plan for
Thomasville Plant B
6
S:\AAA-Master Projects\PTRC\PTR002\Thomasville Furniture Plant B Site\Site-Specific QAPP\HASP - Thomasville Plant B.docx October 7, 2019
Decontamination (Evaluate the need for decontamination, describe procedures, etc.)
Driller’s sampling devices (i.e., screen-point samplers, sampling rods, stainless steel hand augers, and probe rods) shall be decontaminated in accordance with Section 9.1, Field Equipment Decontamination
Procedure, of the H&H Field Procedures Guide. Decontamination is to be performed within a dedicated decontamination area. Decontamination fluids and waste materials will be properly contained for offsite disposal. All other sampling equipment shall be disposed of (i.e., nitrile gloves, DPT
sleeves). Dedicated or disposable sampling apparatus will be properly contained for disposal if it has come into
contact with hazardous materials or suspect hazardous materials. If dedicated or disposable equipment can be properly decontaminated after use, it may be disposed of as non-hazardous in an appropriate container after decontamination.
Site Control (Evaluate the need for site control to protect persons from exposure to hazardous conditions; i.e., work permits, cones, barricade tape, etc.).
H&H personnel shall take necessary measures to maintain site control and limit exposure of persons to hazardous conditions or hazardous materials. As needed, H&H shall establish work areas to be demarked with traffic cones, barricades, caution tape, or other appropriate measures. In general, a minimum perimeter of 25 ft should be established around the work area by one or more of
the control measures listed above. Where possible, operations will not be conducted in a manner which increases personnel or subcontract exposure to traffic or other hazards. No unauthorized personnel are to be allowed in the work areas during operations.
Safety Briefings
Safety briefings will be held on each day during which site work is performed. A minimum of one daily safety briefing will be held on the site by all personnel involved in site operations. Additional safety briefings will be conducted as site conditions or hazards change, when returning to the site following
breaks in operation such as lunch or weekends, or at other appropriate times to be determined by on-site personnel or the Project Manager. Records of these safety meetings will be noted on the safety briefing log sheets (provided at the end of this document) and in the field book, and will include the date and time of the briefing, names and affiliations of attendees, and any pertinent subjects of discussion.
Reviewed By: Justin Ballard
Health & Safety Plan for
Thomasville Plant B
7
S:\AAA-Master Projects\PTRC\PTR002\Thomasville Furniture Plant B Site\Site-Specific QAPP\HASP - Thomasville Plant B.docx Originally executed: August
19, 2019
Date Updated:
Additional Information/Notes (Please enter any pertinent information that may be relevant for the site, this is to be executed before and after site visits. Information may include items like gate instructions, etc.)

Date executed: August 19, 2019
Date updated: Click or tap to enter a date additional information is added. Prepared by Jeffrey Ollison Updated by
Map data ©2019 500 ft
Thomasville, NC 27360
207 Old Lexington Rd, Thomasville, NC 27360
310 Fisher Ferry St
1.Head northeast on Fisher Ferry St toward Walnut
St
2.Turn left onto W Main St
3.Continue onto Lexington Ave
4.Turn left onto Old Lexington Rd
5.Turn left onto Hospital Dr E
6.Slight left to stay on Hospital Dr E
7.Turn right
Novant Health Thomasville Medical Center
0.5 mi
0.5 mi
0.8 mi
0.2 mi
312 ft
190 ft
338 ft
Drive 2.1 miles, 6 min310 Fisher Ferry Street, Thomasville, NC to Novant
Health Thomasville Medical Center
Hospital Map
S:\BBB Health and Safety\HASP Templates & Forms\Forms\Safety Briefing Form.docx
SITE SAFETY BRIEFING FORM

JOB NAME __ NUMBER _____________
DATE START TIME COMPLETED
SITE LOCATION
TYPE OF WORK (GENERAL)

SAFETY ISSUES
TASK (THIS SHIFT)

PROTECTIVE CLOTHING/EQUIPMENT

CHEMICAL HAZARDS

PHYSICAL HAZARDS

CONTROL METHODS

SPECIAL EQUIPMENT/TECHNIQUES

NEAREST PHONE
HOSPITAL NAME/ADDRESS

SPECIAL TOPICS (INCIDENTS, ACTIONS TAKEN, ETC.)

S:\BBB Health and Safety\HASP Templates & Forms\Forms\Safety Briefing Form.docx
ATTENDEES

PRINT NAME SIGN NAME

MEETING CONDUCTED BY:
\\hhsvr.harthickman.local\masterfiles\Office Mgmt Docs\Health & Safety\Health & Safety Plan Templates\Near Miss Form.docx
NEAR MISS REPORT
A near miss is a potential hazard or incident that has not resulted in personal injury. Unsafe working
conditions, unsafe employee work habits, improper use of equipment or use of malfunctioning equipment have the potential to cause work related injuries. It is everyone’s responsibility to report and /or correct these potential accidents/incidents immediately. Please complete this form as a means to
report these near-miss situations. Location Date Time am pm Please check all appropriate conditions:
Unsafe Act Unsafe equipment Unsafe Condition Unsafe use of equipment Description of incident or potential hazard:

Employee Signature Date
(optional)

NEAR MISS INVESTIGATION

Description of the near-miss condition:

Root Causes (primary & contributing):

Corrective action taken (Remove the hazard, replace, repair, or retrain in the proper procedures for the task)

Signed Date Completed
Not completed for the following reason:
Management Date
S:\Office Mgmt Docs\Health & Safety\Health & Safety Plan Templates\Accident_Exposure Report.docx
ACCIDENT / EXPOSURE REPORT FORM

EMPLOYEE NAME DATE OF BIRTH
HOME ADDRESS PHONE NO.
SEX: MALE FEMALE JOB TITLE SOC. SEC. NO.
OFFICE NO. OFFICE LOCATION DATE OF HIRE
HOURS USUALLY WORKED: HOURS PER DAY HOURS PER WEEK
TOTAL HOURS WEEKLY

WHERE DID ACCIDENT, OR EXPOSURE OCCUR? (INCLUDE ADDRESS)

COUNTY ON EMPLOYER’S PREMISES? YES NO
WHAT WAS EMPLOYEE DOING WHEN THE ACCIDENT OCCURRED? (BE SPECIFIC)

HOW DID THE ACCIDENT OR EXPOSURE OCCUR? (DESCRIBE FULLY)

WHAT STEPS COULD BE TAKEN TO PREVENT SUCH AN OCCURRENCE?

OBJECT OR SUBSTANCE THAT DIRECTLY INJURED EMPLOYEE

DESCRIBE THE INJURY OR ILLNESS
PART OF BODY AFFECTED
NAME AND ADDRESS OF PHYSICIAN

S:\Office Mgmt Docs\Health & Safety\Health & Safety Plan Templates\Accident_Exposure Report.docx

IF HOSPITALIZED, NAME AND ADDRESS OF HOSPITAL

DATE OF INJURY/ILLNESS TIME OF DAY
LOSS OF ONE OR MORE DAY OR WORK? YES/NO
IF YES, DATE LAST WORKED
HAS EMPLOYEE RETURNED TO WORK? IF YES, DATE RETURNED
DID EMPLOYEE DIE? IF YES, DATE

COMPLETED BY (PRINT)
SIGNATURE
TITLE DATE

AN ACCIDENT, EXPOSURE REPORT MUST BE COMPLETED BY THE SUPERVISOR
OR SITE SAFETY OFFICER IMMEDIATELY UPON LEARNING OF THE INCIDENT.
THE COMPLETED REPORT MUST BE IMMEDIATELY TRANSMITTED TO THE
MANAGER, HEALTH & SAFETY.