HomeMy WebLinkAbout09042 Scott Aviation_final EMP 20200121
1
EMP Version 2, June 2018
NORTH CAROLINA BROWNFIELDS PROGRAM
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN
This form is to be used to prepare an Environmental Management Plan (EMP) for projects in
the North Carolina Brownfields Program at the direction of a Brownfields project manager.
The EMP is a typical requirement of a Brownfields Agreement (BFA). Its purpose is to clarify
actions to be taken during the demolition and construction at Brownfields properties in an
effort to avoid delays in the event of the discovery of new contamination sources or other
environmental conditions. The EMP provides a means to document redevelopment plans and
environmental data for each applicable environmental medium to inform regulatory-compliant
decision-making at the site. As much detail as possible should be included in the EMP,
including contingency planning for unknowns. Consult your project manager if you have
questions.
Prospective Developers and/or their consultants must complete and submit this form and all
pertinent attachments, see checklist below, to their Brownfields project manager prior to any
earthmoving or other development-related activities that have the potential to disturb soil at
the Brownfields Property, including demolition. For the resultant EMP to be valid for use, it
must be completed, reviewed by the program, signed by all parties working on the project,
and approved by the Brownfields project manager. Failure to comply with the requirements of
the EMP could jeopardize project eligibility, or in the event of a completed agreement, be
cause for a reopener
So that the EMP provides value in protecting brownfields eligibility and public health, the
preparer shall ensure that the following steps have been completed prior to submitting the
EMP for review. Any EMP prepared without completing these steps is premature.
☐ Site sampling and assessment that meets Brownfields’ objectives is complete and has
been reviewed and approved by the Brownfields Project Manager.
☒ Specific redevelopment plans, even if conceptual, have been developed for the project,
submitted and reviewed by the Brownfields Project Manager.
2
EMP Version 2, June 2018
Please submit, along with the completed EMP form, the following attachments, as relevant
and applicable to the proposed redevelopment:
☒ A set of redevelopment plans, including architectural/engineering plans, if available; if
not conceptual plans may suffice if updated when detailed plans are drafted.
☒ A figure overlaying redevelopment plans on a map of the extent of contamination for
each media.
☒ Site grading plans that include a cut and fill analysis.
☐ A figure showing the proposed location and depth of impacted soil that would remain
on site after construction grading.
☐ Any necessary permits for redevelopment (i.e. demolition, etc.).
☐ A detailed construction schedule that includes timing and phases of construction.
☒ Tabulated data summaries for each impacted media (i.e. soil, groundwater, soil gas,
etc.) applicable to the proposed redevelopment.
☒ Figures with the sampling locations and contamination extents for each impacted media
applicable to the proposed redevelopment.
☐ A full final grade sampling and analysis plan, if the redevelopment plan is final.
☐ If known, information about each proposed potential borrow soil source, such as aerial
photos, historic site maps, historic Sanborn maps, a site history, necessary for
brownfields approval.
☐ Information and, analytical data if required, for quarries, or other borrow sources,
detailing the type of material proposed for importation to the Brownfields Property.
☐ A work plan for the sampling and analysis of soil to be brought onto the Brownfields
Property. Refer to Issue Resolution 15 in Brownfields Program Guidelines.
☐ A map of the Brownfields Property showing the location of soils proposed for export
and sampling data from those areas.
☐ If a Vapor Mitigation System is required by the Brownfields Program, the Vapor
Intrusion Mitigation System (VIMS) plan will be signed and sealed by a NC Professional
Engineer. The VIMS Plan may also be submitted under separate cover.
3
EMP Version 2, June 2018
GENERAL INFORMATION
Date: 12/26/2019 Revision Date (if applicable): Click or tap to enter a date.
Brownfields Assigned Project Name: Former Scott Aviation
Brownfields Project Number: 09042-05-090
Brownfields Property Address: 309, 310 and 502 W. Crowell Street; 316, 500 and 503 W. Jefferson
Street; and 500 W. Franklin Street; Monroe, North Carolina 28112. Note this EMP addresses
redevelopment activities across the entire Brownfields property.
Brownfields Property Area (acres): 13.265
Is Brownfields Property Subject to RCRA Permit?.......................☐ Yes ☒ No
If yes enter Permit No.: Click or tap here to enter text.
Is Brownfields Property Subject to a Solid Waste Permit….……..☐ Yes ☒ No
If yes, enter Permit No.: Click or tap here to enter text.
COMMUNICATIONS
A copy of this EMP shall be distributed to all the parties below as well as any contractors or site workers
that may be exposed to site vapors, soil, groundwater, and/or surface water. Additionally, a copy of the
EMP shall be maintained at the Brownfields Property during redevelopment activities. NOTE, THE EMP
DOES NOT TAKE THE PLACE OF A SITE-SPECIFIC HEALTH AND SAFETY PLAN.
Prospective Developer (PD): City of Monroe, a North Carolina Municipal Corporation
Contact Person: Larry Faison
Phone Numbers: Office: 704-282-4501 Mobile: Click or tap here to enter text.
Email: lfaison@monroenc.org
Contractor for PD: Parker Poe Adams & Bernstein LLP
Contact Person: Mary Katherine H. Stukes
Phone Numbers: Office: 704-335-9495 Mobile: 704-907-5372
Email: marykatherinestukes@parkerpoe.com
Environmental Consultant: Resolve Environmental Services, PLLC
Contact Person: Terry D. Kennedy, P.G.
Phone Numbers: Office: 704-289-5881 Mobile: 704-617-1730
Email: tdk@geologicalresourcesinc.com
Brownfields Program Project Manager: Carolyn Minnich
Phone Numbers: Office: 704-661-0330 Mobile: Click or tap here to enter text.
Email: Carolyn.Minnich@ncdenr.gov
4
EMP Version 2, June 2018
Other DEQ Program Contacts (if applicable, i.e., UST Section, Inactive Hazardous Site Branch,
Hazardous Waste, Solid Waste):
DEQ IHSB: Rose Pruitt
rose.pruitt@ncdenr.gov
NOTIFICATIONS TO THE BROWNFIELDS PROGRAM
Written advance Notification Times to Brownfields Project Manager: Check each box to accept
minimum advance notice periods (in calendar days) for each type of onsite task:
On‐site assessment or remedial activities:……………………………………….…… 10 days Prior ☒
Construction or grading start:……………………………………….………………………. 10 days Prior ☒
Discovery of stained soil, odors, USTs, buried drums or waste, landfill, or other signs of previously
unknown contamination: ……………………………….……………………………………. Within 48 hours ☒
Implementation of emergency actions (e.g. dewatering, flood or soil erosion control measures in
area of contamination, ventilation of work zones):…………….……….……… Within 48 hours ☒
Installation of mitigation systems:………………………….………………….……….. 10 days Prior ☒
Other notifications as required by local, state or federal agencies to implement redevelopment
activities: (as applicable): ……………………….…………………………………………..… Within 30 days ☒
REDEVELOPMENT PLANS
1) Type of Redevelopment (check all that apply):
☐Residential ☐Recreational ☒Institutional ☐Commercial ☒Office ☐Retail ☐Industrial
☐Other specify:
Senior Center: conversion of the former Enquirer Journal building into a senior center located at
500 West Jefferson Street
Police Station: Main police station and fire station located at 310 West Crowell Street.
Parking Lots: located at 316 and 500 West Jefferson Street, 309 West Crowell/316 West Jefferson
Street, 502 West Franklin Street and 503 West Jefferson Street/500 West Franklin Street.
2) Check the following activities that will be conducted prior to commencing earth‐moving activities
at the site:
☒ Review of historic maps (Sanborn Maps, facility maps)
☐ Conducting geophysical surveys to evaluate the location of suspect UST, fuel lines, utility
5
EMP Version 2, June 2018
lines, etc.
☒ Interviews with employees/former employees/facility managers/neighbors
3) Summary of Redevelopment Plans (MANDATORY: attach detailed plans or conceptual plans, if
detailed plans are not available. EMP review without such information would be premature):
Provide brief summary of redevelopment plans, including demolition, removal of building
slabs/pavement, grading plans and planned construction of new structures:
Removal of the building slabs will be conducted subsequent to approval of the EMP. The slabs
will be removed with an excavator. Any soil that adheres to the removed concrete will be
removed and placed back on the exposed sub-slab soil. However, it is inferred that the slabs are
underlain by crushed stone and not in contact with native soil. The removed concrete will be
transported off-site for disposal.
Removal of the slabs is necessary to allow for a geotechnical study to determine the load bearing
capacities of the underlying soils and determine the volumetric calculations for the cut and fill
analysis.
Scott Figgie, the entity retaining responsibility for the existing impacts at the property (“the RP”),
collected soil gas samples beneath the existing slab (to be demolished) in August 2019. Results
of that sampling effort are attached. At the RP’s request, additional soil-gas sampling will be
conducted by AECOM following slab removal.
Removal of the slabs and subsequent soil-gas survey will be necessary to determine if vapor
mitigation at the site will be required. If necessary, an engineered vapor mitigation plan would
need to be incorporated into the site construction plans. This data will be necessary prior to
completion of the A/E drawings necessary for project bid documents and the final version of the
EMP.
Only minor exterior renovations will be conducted on the Senior Center (former Enquirer Journal
building) at 500 West Jefferson Street expansion. No demolition or earth moving are proposed
for the Senior Center parcel. The existing former industrial building slabs located at 309 and 310
West Crowell will be removed, prior to site prep work. Each slab will be perforated with a bobcat
or equivalent equipment. Pieces of the slab will be removed, inspected and; cleaned, if
necessary. Cleaning will be conducted in an appropriate water tight metal or plastic container
and the rinseate will be containerized for disposal. Ambient air quality beneath removed slabs
will be checked with a PID to ensure safe removal conditions for workers.
Only minor grading for storm water runoff will be conducted at each location. Identified
impacted soils exceeding were previously removed by excavation in mid-2018 at the 309 West
Crowell Street site pursuant to a DEQ-approved EMP. Excavation of identified impacted soils
exceeding will be conducted at 310 W. Crowell Street in late-2019 and are to be governed by the
Soil Excavation EMP as described above. Once impacted soil removal is completed the property
site work will begin on the planned police station and, later, the separate fire station. Any site
6
EMP Version 2, June 2018
work to occur prior to the completion of soil excavation activities will be subject to DEQs
approval. However, this EMP contemplates that the soil excavation work will be completed when
planned activities occur. The proposed police station will be an approximate 33,000 ft2, 2-story
structure on slab with steel construction and will contain offices. The fire station will be a slab
mounted, single story steel structure totaling approximately 30,000 ft2. An approximate 3,000
ft2 single story, slab mounted, wash building is proposed in between the 2 larger buildings.
Clean fill will be imported to raise the elevation of the police station for security purposes. An
estimated 1,200 yd3 of clean fill will be imported to the 310 West Crowell Street property. The
309 West Crowell Street property and the contiguous 316 West Jefferson Street properties will
be redeveloped as a parking lot with landscaped areas. The parcels located at 500 W. Franklin
Street and 503 W. Jefferson Street will remain as parking lots, but may be upgraded with minor
landscaping.
Soil and ground water/vapor for the site will be industrial/commercial standards, with the
exception of the VIMS plan for the proposed Fire Department Building which will be designed to
residential standards.
Relevant A/E Plans completed to date are included in Appendix A. The proposed redevelopment
map is included in Appendix B.
4) Do plans include demolition of structure(s)?:
☐ Yes ☒ No ☐ Unknown
☐ If yes, please check here to confirm that demolition will be conducted in accordance with
applicable legal requirements, including without limitation those related to lead and asbestos
abatement that are administered by the Health Hazards Control Unit within the Division of Public
Health of the North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services. If available, please
provide a copy of your demolition permit.
5) Are sediment and erosion control measures required by federal, state, or local regulations?
☒ Yes ☐ No ☐ Unknown
☒ If yes, please check here to confirm that demolition will be conducted in accordance with
applicable legal requirements. If soil disturbance is necessary to install sediment and erosion
control measures, they may not begin until this EMP is approved.
6) Which category of risk‐based screening level is used or is anticipated to be specified in the
Brownfields Agreement? Note: If children frequent the property, residential screening levels shall
be cited in the Brownfields Agreement for comparison purposes.
☒ Residential ☒ Non‐Residential or Industrial/Commercial
7) Schedule for Redevelopment (attach construction schedule):
a) Construction start date: 1/2/2020
b) Anticipated duration (specify activities during each phase):
7
EMP Version 2, June 2018
Bid solicitation for site redevelopment is scheduled for December 2019 and bid award
scheduled for January 2020. The awarded general contractor will provide a detailed timeline
for project completion at that time.
The soil excavation activities specified in the Soil Excavation EMP are expected to have a
duration of four months and will commence in December 2019. However, some site
redevelopment will be conducted concurrently with soil excavation. In particular, slab
removal at 309 and 310 West Crowell Street is anticipated to commence in January 2020.
The existing slabs will be penetrated and removed and transported to a C&D Landfill for
disposal. Following the soil-gas survey in the footprint of the removed slabs, vapor
mitigation determination and geotechnical study, the final A/E designs including cut and fill
analysis can be completed. The final A/E plans will be incorporated into a construction bid
and also submitted to the Brownfields Program manager in the final revision of the EMP.
Additionally, remodeling of the Enquirer Journal building into the Senior Center will be
initiated. These activities will include the remodeling of the interior of the building, façades
and entryway. No cutting or filling of soil will be conducted during the remodeling of the
Senior Center. Project duration for the Senior Center buildout is approximately 6 months.
Following completion of the planned soil excavation and slab removals at 309 and 310 West
Crowell Street, utility trenches will be installed. The 310 West Crowell site will be regraded
according to the grading pan. Concrete slab will be poured, utility line extensions completed
to the locations of the proposed police and fire stations. Any necessary sub slab or slab vapor
mitigation system would also be installed at that time. Perimeter lighting installation would
also be completed.
Subsequently, the steel of the building will be erected for the police station. Installation of
the roofing, HVAC, framing, electrical, plumbing, interior and exterior walls will be installed.
If required, an active vapor mitigation system would be installed. This phase is anticipated to
be 16 months in duration.
Paving and landscaping will be the final stage of the project. These activities are estimated to
take 30 days to complete.
More detailed timelines for the phases and phase durations will be determined by the
awarded contractor.
The fire department building will be constructed in a similar phase and duration as the police
department building. This phase will be conducted at a later date. Duration of this later
phase is estimated at 12 months.
c) Additional phases planned? ☐ Yes ☐ No
If yes, specify the start date and/or activities if known:
8
EMP Version 2, June 2018
Start Date: TBD
Planned Activity:
Additional phases are planned; however, the check box above in section c) does not permit
editing in this NCDEQ template format. A fire station building will be constructed on the
eastern portion of the site as outlined in the site drawings, although the timing for this later
phase has not yet been determined.
Start Date: Click or tap to enter a date.
Planned Activity:
Click or tap here to enter text.
Start Date: Click or tap to enter a date.
Planned Activity:
d) Provide the planned date of occupancy for new buildings: 8/2/2021
CONTAMINATED MEDIA
1) Contaminated Media on the Brownfields Property
Part 1. Soil:……………………………………….……………. ☒ Yes ☐ No ☐ Suspected
Part 2. Groundwater:.……………………….……..……. ☒ Yes ☐ No ☐ Suspected
Part 3. Surface Water:.……………...……..…………… ☐ Yes ☒ No ☐ Suspected
Part 4. Sediment:.……………...……..…………………… ☐ Yes ☒ No ☐ Suspected
Part 5. Soil Vapor:…..…………...……..…………………. ☐ Yes ☐ No ☒ Suspected
Part 6. Sub‐Slab Soil Vapor:……...……..…………….. ☒ Yes ☐ No ☐ Suspected
Part 7. Indoor Air:...……..…………………………………. ☐ Yes ☒ No ☐ Suspected
2) For the Area of Proposed Redevelopment on the Brownfields Property, attach tabulated data
summaries for each impacted media and figure(s) with sample locations.
PART 1. Soil – Please fill out the information below, using detailed site plans, if available, or estimate
using known areas of contaminated soil and a conceptual redevelopment plan. Provide a figure
overlaying new construction onto figure showing contaminated soil and groundwater locations.
1) Known or suspected contaminants in soil (list general groups of contaminants):
Chlorinated solvents 1,1,1-TCA, 1,1-DCE, 1,2-DCA, cis-1,2-DCE, PCE, TCE VC Parcel 1 (309 W.
Crowell St.) and Parcel 2 (310 W. Crowell St.) A summary of the sample analytical results are
provided in Appendix C. Soil sample location maps are included In Appendix D.
2) Depth of known or suspected contaminants (feet):
9
EMP Version 2, June 2018
2-12 feet
3) Area of soil disturbed by redevelopment (square feet):
Up to 50,000
4) Depths of soil to be excavated (feet):
2-3 feet
5) Estimated volume of soil (cubic yards) to be excavated (attach grading plan):
Estimated less than 200 yds3 during utility work and installation of building footers.
6) Estimated volume of excavated soil (cubic yards) anticipated to be impacted by contaminants:
Unknown. The amount of soil requiring excavation will be determined following slab removal
and geotechnical study. Once the load bearing capacity of the soils is determined, the proposed
utility and building footer drawings can be completed and the volume of contaminated soil
encountered during excavation at the site can be determined in the cut and fill analysis.
7) Estimated volume of contaminated soil expected to be disposed of offsite, if applicable:
Soil excavation and off-site disposal are described in the separate Soil Excavation EMP. This
section addresses only soils anticipated to be encountered during redevelopment activities. It is
anticipated that any soils requiring excavation may be re-contoured into the site and capped, if
necessary. The volume of any necessary soil requiring disposal will be made following slab
removal and completion of the cut and fill analysis. The cut and fill analysis will be provided to
the Brownfields Program manager once completed and will be included in the final EMP.
Part 1.A. MANAGING ONSITE SOIL
If soil is anticipated to be excavated from the Brownfield Property, relocated on the Brownfields
Property, or otherwise disturbed during site grading or other redevelopment activities, please
provide a grading plan that clearly illustrates areas of cut and fill (approximate areas & volumes are
acceptable, if only preliminary data available).
1) HAZARDOUS WASTE DETERMINATION:
a) Does the soil contain a LISTED WASTE as defined in the North Carolina Hazardous
Waste Section under 40 CFR Part 261.31‐261.35?....................................... ☐Yes ☒No
☐ If yes, explain why below, including the level of knowledge regarding processes
generating the waste (include pertinent analytical results as needed).
Click or tap here to enter text.
☐ If yes, do the soils exceed the “Contained‐Out” levels in Attachment 1 of the
North Carolina Contained‐In Policy?................................................. ☐ Yes ☐ No
b) NOTE: IF SOIL MEETS THE DEFINITION OF A LISTED HAZARDOUS WASTE AND EXCEEDS
10
EMP Version 2, June 2018
THE CONTAINED‐OUT LEVELS IN ATTACHMENT 1 TO THE NORTH CAROLINA
CONTAINED‐IN POLICY THE SOIL MAY NOT BE RE‐USED ON SITE AND MUST BE
DISPOSED OF IN ACCORDANCE WITH DEQ HAZARDOUS WASTE SECTION RULES AND
REGULATIONS.
c) Does the soil contain a CHARACTERISTIC WASTE?.................................... ☐ Yes ☒ No
☐ If yes, mark reason(s) why below (and include pertinent analytical results).
☐ Ignitability Click or tap here to enter text.
☐ Corrosivity Click or tap here to enter text.
☐ Reactivity Click or tap here to enter text.
☐ Toxicity Click or tap here to enter text.
☐ TCLP results Click or tap here to enter text.
☐ Rule of 20 results (20 times total analytical results for an individual
hazardous constituent on TCLP list cannot, by test method, exceed regulatory
TCLP standard)
Characteristic waste was excavated and disposed in 2018 from Parcel I (310
W. Crowell St.) and is planned to be excavated and disposed at Parcel II
pursuant to the Soil Excavation EMP.
☐ If no, explain rationale:
Characteristic waste identified during the site assessment in 2014 was
subsequently removed during excavation activities on 309 West Crowell
Street/316 West Jefferson Street Parcel in mid-2018. Additional excavation of
contaminated soil in the vicinity of the former hazardous waste storage building
at 310 West Crowell Street is proposed to commence In December 2020.
d) NOTE: IF SOIL MEETS THE DEFINITION OF A CHARACTERISTIC HAZARDOUS WASTE, THE
SOIL MAY NOT BE RE‐USED ON SITE AND MUST BE DISPOSED OF IN ACCORDANCE
WITH DEQ HAZARDOUS WASTE SECTION RULES AND REGULATIONS.
2) Screening criteria by which soil disposition decisions will be made (e.g., left in place, capped in
place with low permeability barrier, removed to onsite location and capped, removed offsite):
☐ Preliminary Health‐Based Residential SRGs
☒ Preliminary Health‐Based Industrial/Commercial SRGs
☐ Division of Waste Management Risk Calculator (For Brownfields Properties Only)
☐ Site‐specific risk‐based cleanup level. Please provide details of methods used for
determination/explanation.
Remaining contaminated soil at the site will be capped with concrete or asphalt.
Additional comments:
11
EMP Version 2, June 2018
Click or tap here to enter text.
3) If known impacted soil is proposed to be reused within the Brownfields Property Boundary,
please check the measures that will be utilized to ensure safe placement and documentation of
same. Please attach a proposed location diagram/site map.
☒ Provide documentation of analytical report(s) to Brownfields Project Manager
☒ Provide documentation of final location, thickness and depth of relocated soil on site map
to Brownfields Project Manager once known
☐ Geotextile to mark depth of fill material.
Provide description of material:
Click or tap here to enter text.
☒ Manage soil under impervious cap ☒ or clean fill ☐
☐ Describe cap or fill:
Concrete /asphalt
☒ Confer with NC BF Project Manager if Brownfield Plat must be revised (or re‐recorded if
actions are Post‐Recordation).
☒ GPS the location and provide site map with final location.
☐ Other. Please provide a description of the measure:
4) Please describe the following action(s) to be taken during and following excavation and
management of site soils:
Management of fugitive dust from site
☒ Yes, describe the method will include:
If necessary, BMPs, including spraying soils with water to minimize visual dust, will be
followed during management of soils. The excavation contractor will excavate and grade
during appropriate weather conditions to minimize fugitive dust.
☐ No, explain rationale:
Click or tap here to enter text.
Field Screening of site soil
☒ Yes, describe the field screening method, frequency of field screening, person conducting
field screening:
If contaminated soils are encountered, health and safety monitoring for VOCs using a PID
at the site by the environmental consultant will be conducted. The environmental
consultant will also observe soils to identify staining, odors, debris or other indicators of
contamination and verify that all impacted soil is removed.
☐ No, explain rationale:
Click or tap here to enter text.
12
EMP Version 2, June 2018
Click or tap here to enter text.
Soil Sample Collection
☒ Yes, describe the sampling method (e.g., in‐situ grab, composite, stockpile, etc.):
Soil contamination at the site has been delineated. Excavation of characteristic soils have
or will be removed prior to construction. Suspect soils that exhibit odor, staining or
elevated PID concentrations will be segregated and placed into a roll-off container. A base
and four sidewall grab samples will be collected from each excavation basin. A composite
sample will be collected from each roll-off container for waste characterization.
☐ No, explain rationale:
Click or tap here to enter text.
If soil samples are collected for analysis, please check the applicable chemical analytes:
☒ Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by EPA Method 8260
☒ Semi‐volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) by EPA Method 8270
☒ Metals RCRA List (8) (arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium, mercury, lead, selenium
and silver): Specify Analytical Method Number(s):
Click or tap here to enter text.
☐ Pesticides: Specify Analytical Method Number(s):
Click or tap here to enter text.
☐ PCBs: Specify Analytical Method Number(s):
Click or tap here to enter text.
☐ Other Constituents & Respective Analytical Method(s) (i.e. Hexavalent Chromium,
Herbicides, etc.): Specify Analytical Method Number(s):
Click or tap here to enter text.
☒ Check to confirm that stockpiling of known or suspected impacted soils will be conducted
in accordance with Figure 1 of this EMP. Stockpile methodology should provide erosion
control, prohibiting contact between surface water/precipitation and contaminated soil,
and preventing contaminated runoff. Explain any variances or provide additional details as
needed:
☒ Final grade sampling of exposed native soil (i.e., soil that will not be under buildings or
permanent hardscape). Select chemical analyses for final grade samples with check boxes
below (Check all that apply):
☒ Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by EPA Method 8260
Soils with no known or suspected impacts will be stockpiled on site. Suspected contaminated soils
will be placed in roll-off containers and sampled by the analytical methods specified below. Roll-offs
contacting suspected contaminated soil will be placed on concrete areas at the site pending waste
characterization.
13
EMP Version 2, June 2018
☒ Semi‐volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) by EPA Method 8270
☒ Metals RCRA List (8) (arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium, mercury, lead,
selenium and silver): Specify Analytical Method Number(s):
Click or tap here to enter text.
☐ Pesticides: Specify Analytical Method Number(s):
Click or tap here to enter text.
☐ PCBs: Specify Analytical Method Number(s):
Click or tap here to enter text.
☐ Other Constituents & Respective Analytical Method(s) (i.e. Hexavalent
Chromium, Herbicides, etc.):
Click or tap here to enter text.
Please provide a scope of work for final grade sampling, including a diagram of soil
sampling locations, number of samples to be collected, and brief sampling methodology.
Samples should be collected from 0-2 ft below ground surface, with the exception of VOCs
which should be taken from 1-2 ft below ground surface. Alternatively, a work plan for
final grade sampling may be submitted under separate cover.
Final grade sampling will be conducted following completion of grading activities. Each
sample will be collected with a clean hand auger. Up to three samples per disturbed area
will be collected and analyzed by the methods specified above. Estimated sample
collection depths will vary from grade level to 2 feet BGS.
☐ If final grade sampling was NOT selected please explain rationale:
Click or tap here to enter text.
Part 1.B. IMPORTED FILL SOIL
NO SOIL MAY BE BROUGHT ONTO THE BROWNFIELDS PROPERTY WITHOUT PRIOR APPROVAL
FROM THE BROWNFIELDS PROGRAM. According to the Brownfields IR 15, “Documenting
imported soil (by sampling, analysis, and reporting in accordance with review and written
approval in advance by the Brownfields Program), will safeguard the liability protections provided
by the brownfields agreement and is in the best interest of the prospective developer/property
owner.”
Requirements for importing fill:
1) Will fill soil be imported to the site?................................................ ☒ Yes ☐ No ☐ Unknown
2) If yes, what is the estimated volume of fill soil to be imported?
Limited amount of fill may be required to prepare land and reach grade level during building
construction and site renovations. The volume of imported soil is unknown. Once the final
grading plan is completed the volume of fill can be estimated.
14
EMP Version 2, June 2018
3) If yes, what is the anticipated depth that fill soil will be placed at the property? (If a range
of depths, please list the range.)
Approximately 2 feet
4) Provide the source of fill, including: location, site history, nearby environmental concerns,
etc. Attach aerial photos, maps, historic Sanborn maps and a borrow source site history:
The source of the fill material will be determined by the successful winning bidder. A work plan
for sampling the proposed borrow pit will be submitted for NCDEQ review and approval following
award of the contract.
5) PRIOR TO ITS PLACEMENT AT THE BROWNFIELDS PROPERTY, provide a plan to analyze fill
soil to demonstrate that it meets acceptable standards applicable to the site and can be
approved for use at the Brownfields property.
Based upon the local barrow pits and quarries in the vicinity of the site, crushed stone imported
for fill will likely originate from the Martin Marietta Bakers Quarry in Monroe, NC. Imported soil
will likely be acquired from local borrow pit in Monroe, NC. However, the imported soil source
will be determined by the GC. A sampling plan for the imported fill facility will be determined
after the contract is awarded and the EMP will be updated at that time to identify the source(s)
and the sampling plan. Representative samples from the borrow pit will be analyzed by the
methods specified below.
6) Please check the applicable chemical analytes for fill soil samples. (Check all that apply):
☒ Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by EPA Method 8260
☒ Semi‐volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) by EPA Method 8270
☒ Metals RCRA List (8) (arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium, mercury, lead,
selenium and silver): Specify Analytical Method Number(s):
Click or tap here to enter text.
☐ Pesticides: Specify Analytical Method Number(s):
Click or tap here to enter text.
☐ PCBs: Specify Analytical Method Number(s):
Click or tap here to enter text.
☐ Other Constituents & Respective Analytical Method(s) (i.e. Hexavalent
Chromium, Herbicides, etc.):
Click or tap here to enter text.
7) The scope of work for import fill sampling may be provided below or in a Work Plan
submitted separately for DEQ review and approval. Attach specific location maps for in-situ
borrow sites. If using a quarry, provide information on the type of material to be brought
onto the Brownfields Property.
If soil is imported from an off-site property or borrow pit that is not a known permitted quarry, a
sampling plan will be developed and submitted for DEQ review. DEQ approval of the sampling
15
EMP Version 2, June 2018
plan and analytical results will be obtained prior to transporting import soil the Brownfields
property. The borrow pit samples will be analyzed in accordance with the methods specified in
item #6 above. However, if the borrow source has not be previously developed (virgin land) soil
samples will be collected for the laboratory analysis indicated above at a general rate of 1 per 500
to 1000 cu yds. If the borrow source property has been previous developed, the soil samples will
be collected for laboratory analysis indicated above at a general rate of 1 per 400 cu yds.
Part 1.C. EXPORTED SOIL
NO SOIL MAY LEAVE THE BROWNFIELDS PROPERTY WITHOUT APPROVAL FROM THE
BROWNFIELDS PROGRAM. FAILURE TO OBTAIN APPROVAL MAY VIOLATE A BROWNFIELDS
AGREEMENT CAUSING A REOPENER OR JEOPARDIZING ELIGIBILITY IN THE PROGRAM,
ENDANGERING LIABILITY PROTECTIONS AND MAKING SAID ACTION POSSIBLY SUBJECT TO
ENFORCEMENT. JUSTIFICATIONS PROVIDED BELOW MUST BE APPROVED BY THE PROGRAM IN
WRITING PRIOR TO COMPLETING TRANSPORT ACTIVITIES. Please refer to Brownfields IR 15 for
additional details.
1) If export from a Brownfields Property is anticipated, please provide details regarding the
proposed export actions. Volume of exported soil, depths, location from which soil will
be excavated on site, related sampling results, etc. Provide a site map with locations of
export and sampling results included.
Export of soil has not been determined at this time. Removal of the existing slabs and
subsequent geotechnical survey will be necessary before any cut and fill analysis can be
completed. Once the slabs are removed and the geotechnical study is completed, the EMP will
be updated with the cut and fill plan. At this time, it is anticipated that any cut material will be
reincorporated into the planned final grade at the site and capped if necessary, to the greatest
extent possible. However, any soil deemed necessary to export will be stockpiled on site in roll-
off containers. Stockpile soil grab-type samples will be collected from the stockpiled soil and
analyzed by the methods specified above for waste characterization and prior to disposal option
determination. The soil sampling data will be forwarded to the Brownfields Program manager
and the most cost-effective and appropriate disposal options will be presented to the
Brownfields Program manager for review and approval. It is anticipated that any export soil will
either be transported to another, as yet undetermined, Brownfields facility or to a permitted
waste facility based upon the waste characterization.
2) To what type of facility will the export Brownfields soil be sent?
☒ Subtitle D/Municipal Solid Waste Landfill (analytical program to be determined by
landfill)
☒ Permitted but Unlined Landfill (i.e. LCID, C&D, etc.) Analytical program to be
determined by the accepting Landfill;
☐ Landfarm or other treatment facility
☒ Use as fill at another suitable Brownfields Property – determination that a
16
EMP Version 2, June 2018
site is suitable will require, at a minimum, that similar concentrations of the same or
similar contaminants already exist at both sites, use of impacted soil will not increase
the potential for risk to human health and the environment at the receiving Brownfields
property, and that a record of the acceptance of such soil from the property owner of
the receiving site is provided to Brownfields. Please provide additional details below.
☐ Use as Beneficial Fill off-site at a non-Brownfields Property - Please provide
documentation of approval from the property owner for receipt of fill material. This will
also require approval by the DEQ Solid Waste Section. Additional information is
provided in IR 15. Please provide additional details below.
3) Additional Details: (if transfer of soil to another property is requested above, please provide
details related to the proposed plans).
This option will be studied once the cut and fill plan has been completed and submitted to the
Brownfields Program manager in an updated EMP. All removed concrete slab pieces will be
“shaken out” during removal to remove any visible soil that adheres to the concrete.
Subsequently, the removed concrete slab pieces will be transported to a C&D landfill for
disposal.
Part 1.D. MANAGEMENT OF UTILITY TRENCHES
☐ Install liner between native impacted soils and base of utility trench before filling with clean fill
(Preferred)
☒ Last out, first in principle for impacted soils (if soil can safely be reused onsite and is not a
hazardous waste), i.e., impacted soils are placed back at approximately the depths they
were removed from such that impacted soil is not placed at a greater depth than the original
depth from which it was excavated.
☐ Evaluate whether necessary to install barriers in conduits to prevent soil vapor transport,
and/or degradation of conduit materials due to direct impact with contaminants?
☐ If yes, provide specifications on barrier materials:
Click or tap here to enter text.
☐ If no, include rationale here:
Contaminated soil exceeding the cleanup goals will have been previously identified by
confirmation analyses and have been or will be removed from the site, prior to construction.
Other comments regarding managing impacted soil in utility trenches:
Click or tap here to enter text.
PART 2. GROUNDWATER – Please fill out the information below.
17
EMP Version 2, June 2018
1) What is the depth to groundwater at the Brownfields Property?
7-31 feet BGS
2) Is groundwater known to be contaminated by ☒onsite ☐offsite ☐both or ☐unknown
sources? Describe source(s):
Former Hazardous Waste Storage Areas, Former AST(s) and site activities during operation of the
Scott Aviation facility. A summary of ground water analytical results and maps are included in
Appendices C & F, respectively.
3) What is the direction of groundwater flow at the Brownfields Property?
North to Northwest
4) Will groundwater likely be encountered during planned redevelopment activities?
☐Yes ☒No
If yes, describe these activities:
Click or tap here to enter text.
Regardless of the answer; in the event that contaminated groundwater is encountered
during redevelopment activities (even if no is checked above), list activities for contingent
management of groundwater (e.g., dewatering of groundwater from excavations or
foundations, containerizing, offsite disposal, discharge to sanitary sewer, NPDES permit, or
sampling procedures).
Allow ground water to re-infiltrate for approximately 24 hours before dewatering from
excavations and foundations. Containerize the ground water, collect sample(s) and analyze by
the methods specified above for use in developing a profile for proper offsite disposal.
5) Are monitoring wells currently present on the Brownfields Property?.................☒Yes ☐No
If yes, are any monitoring wells routinely monitored through DEQ or other
agencies?..................................................................................................................☐Yes ☒No
6) Please check methods to be utilized in the management of known and previously
unidentified wells.
☒ Abandonment of site monitoring wells in accordance with all applicable regulations. It
is the Brownfields Program’s intent to allow proper abandonment of well(s) as
specified in the Brownfields Agreement, except if required for active monitoring
through another section of DEQ or the EPA.
☒ Location of existing monitoring wells marked
☒ Existing monitoring wells protected from disturbance
☐ Newly identified monitoring wells will be marked and protected from further
disturbance until notification to DEQ Brownfields can be made and approval for
abandonment is given.
7) Please provide additional details as needed:
To the best of our knowledge the existing monitoring well network is not being sampled or
maintained by any other regulatory branch or agency.
18
EMP Version 2, June 2018
Please note, disturbance of existing site monitoring wells without approval by DEQ is not
permissible. If monitoring wells are damaged and/or destroyed, DEQ may require that the PD
be responsible for replacement of the well.
PART 3. SURFACE WATER -Please fill out the information below.
1) Is surface water present at the property? ☐ Yes ☒ No
2) Attach a map showing the location of surface water at the Brownfields Property.
3) Is surface water at the property known to be contaminated? ☐ Yes ☒ No
4) Will workers or the public be in contact with surface water during planned redevelopment
activities? ☐ Yes ☒ No
5) In the event that contaminated surface water is encountered during redevelopment
activities, or clean surface water enters open excavations, list activities for management of
such events (e.g. flooding, contaminated surface water run‐off, stormwater impacts):
Prevent rain water runoff from entering the renovated areas by setting up barriers to divert flow
from disturbed soils. Containerize any surface water that comes in contact with disturbed soils.
Collect sample(s) of containerized surface water and analyze for VOCs using EPA Method 8260
for use in developing a profile for proper offsite disposal.
PART 4. SEDIMENT – Please fill out the information below.
1) Are sediment sources present on the property? ☐ Yes ☒ No
2) If yes, is sediment at the property known to be contaminated: ☐ Yes ☒ No
3) Will workers or the public be in contact with sediment during planned redevelopment
activities? ☐ Yes ☒ No
4) Attach a map showing location of known contaminated sediment at the property.
5) In the event that contaminated sediment is encountered during redevelopment activities, list
activities for management of such events (stream bed disturbance):
No surface water is present on the property.
PART 5. SOIL VAPOR – Please fill out the information below.
1) Do concentrations of volatile organic compounds at the Brownfields property exceed the
19
EMP Version 2, June 2018
following vapor intrusion screening levels (current version) in the following media:
IHSB Residential Screening Levels:
Soil Vapor:………..☐ Yes ☐ No ☒ Unknown
Groundwater:.….☒ Yes ☐ No ☐ Unknown
IHSB Industrial/Commercial Screening Levels:
Soil Vapor:………..☐ Yes ☐ No ☒ Unknown
Groundwater:…..☒ Yes ☐ No ☐ Unknown
2) Attach a map showing the locations of soil vapor contaminants that exceed site
screening levels.
3) If applicable, at what depth(s) is soil vapor known to be contaminated?
4) Will workers encounter contaminated soil vapor during planned redevelopment activities?
☐ Yes ☐ No ☒ Unknown
5) In the event that contaminated soil vapor is encountered during redevelopment activities
(trenches, manways, basements or other subsurface work,) list activities for management
of such contact:
Soil vapor will be monitored with an OVA during excavation activities. If contaminated soil
vapors are encountered, NCDEQ will be notified. The area will be evacuated and appropriate
safety screening of vapors will be performed. If results indicate further action is warranted,
appropriate engineering controls, such as use of a fan and/or personal protective equipment will
be implemented. In addition, the potential need for building vapor mitigation will be considered
at that time.
PART 6. SUB‐SLAB SOIL VAPOR – Please fill out the information below if existing buildings or
foundations will be retained in the redevelopment.
1) Are sub‐slab soil vapor data available for the Brownfields Property? ☒ Yes ☐ No ☐ Unknown
2) If data indicate that sub‐slab soil vapor concentrations exceed screening levels, attach a map
showing the location of these exceedances.
3) At what depth(s) is sub‐slab soil vapor known to be contaminated? ☒0‐6 inches ☐Other, please
describe:
Unknown
4) Will workers encounter contaminated sub‐slab soil vapor during planned redevelopment
activities? ☒ Yes ☐ No ☒ Unknown
5) In the event that contaminated soil vapor is encountered during redevelopment activities, list
activities for management of such contact
Since removal of the existing slabs will be conducted, personnel may be initially exposed to
trapped sub slab vapors. Remove personnel from the area of contaminated soil vapor and allow
Unknown
20
EMP Version 2, June 2018
the vapors to disperse, as determined by PID monitoring.
PART 7. INDOOR AIR – Please fill out the information below.
1) Are indoor air data available for the Brownfields Property? ☒ Yes ☐ No ☐ Unknown
2) Attach a map showing the location(s) where indoor air contaminants exceed site screening levels.
3) If the structures where indoor air has been documented to exceed risk‐based screening levels will
not be demolished as part of redevelopment activities, will workers encounter contaminated
indoor air during planned redevelopment activities? ☐ Yes ☐ No ☐ Unknown
4) In the event that contaminated indoor air is encountered during redevelopment activities, list
activities for management of such contact:
VAPOR INTRUSION MITIGATION SYSTEM – Please fill out the information below.
Is a vapor intrusion mitigation system (VIMS) proposed for this Brownfields Property?
☐ Yes ☐ No ☒ Unknown
If yes, ☐ VIMS Plan Attached or ☒ VIMS Plan to be submitted separately
If submitted separately provide date:
Concentrations of contaminants of concern in previously collected ground water samples at the
site exceed the commercial/industrial VISLs in 18 locations.
A soil gas survey at the site will be completed in January-February 2020, once the slab on the
310 W. Crowell Street site is removed. The soil-gas survey will also include the proposed police
station fire department building footprints.
As directed by the Brownfields Project Manager a VIMS Plan will be required for the buildings at
the site. Since the proposed Fire Department building may have sleep quarters, the VIMS plan for
the Fire Department Building will be designed to for vapor protection to residential standards,
The VIMS plan for the Police Station will be the commercial/industrial standards.
In February 2020, a VIMS plan will be submitted to the NCDEQ Brownfields Project Manager for
review and approval.
VIMS Plan shall be signed and sealed by a NC Professional Engineer
Indoor quality was below the residential VISLs for the samples collected from the former Enquirer-
Journal building at 500 West Jefferson Street. No other buildings currently exist at the site.
21
EMP Version 2, June 2018
If no, please provide a brief rationale as to why no vapor mitigation plan is warranted:
Click or tap here to enter text.
CONTINGENCY PLAN – encountering unknown tanks, drums, or other waste materials
In this section please provide actions that will be taken to identify or manage unknown
potential new sources of contamination. During redevelopment activities, it is not uncommon
that unknown tanks, drums, fuel lines, landfills, or other waste materials are encountered.
Notification to DEQ Brownfields Project Manager, UST Section, Fire Department, and/or other
officials, as necessary and appropriate, is required when new potential source(s) of
contamination are discovered. These Notification Requirements were outlined on Page 1 of this
EMP.
Should potentially impacted materials be identified that are inconsistent with known site
impacts, the DEQ Brownfields Project Manager will be notified and a sampling plan will be
prepared based on the EMP requirements and site-specific factors. Samples will generally be
collected to document the location of the potential impacts.
Check the following chemical analysis that are to be conducted on newly identified releases:
☒ Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by EPA Method 8260
☒ Semi‐volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) by EPA Method 8270
☒ Metals RCRA List (8) (arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium, mercury, lead, selenium and
silver)
Click or tap here to enter text.
☐ Pesticides: Specify Analytical Method Number(s):
Click or tap here to enter text.
☐ PCBs: Specify Analytical Method Number(s):
Click or tap here to enter text.
☐ Other Constituents & Analytical Method(s) (i.e. Hexavalent Chromium, Herbicides, etc.)
Please note, if field observations indicate the need for additional analyses, they should
be conducted, even if not listed here.
Click or tap here to enter text.
Please provide details on the proposed methods of managing the following commonly
encountered issues during redevelopment of Brownfields Properties.
Encountering items or issues of environmental concern during the development of the site will be
reported to the NCDEQ Brownfields Project Manager.
Underground Storage Tanks:
22
EMP Version 2, June 2018
Should a previously unreported underground storage tank (UST) be identified during site
development activities, excavation activities in the vicinity of the UST will be put on hold and the
discovery will be reported to the environmental consultant, who will assess the situation and report
to the DEQ within 48 hours of discovery. The tank will be inspected to determine if any product
remains in the tank. The contents of the tank will be evaluated, analyzed, and disposed of at a
licensed offsite facility in accordance with regulatory requirements and DEQ approval. Unless an
alternative approach is approved by DEQ, the tank will be removed in accordance with applicable
UST regulation, surrounding soil and soil at the base of the tank will be screened with a
photoionization detector (PID) and flame ionization detector (FID), the breathing zone will be
monitored using a PID/FID, and confirmatory sampling and/or remedial activities will be conducted
to the satisfaction of DEQ, which will include all applicable sampling locations including the base of
the tank. Sampling locations will be selected as outlined in the Guidelines for Site Checks, Tank
Closure, and Initial Response and Abatement for UST Releases (UST Section, DEQ, Division of Waste
Management, February 2019) . Samples will be analyzed as
referenced above at the start of this section of the EMP.
Sub-Grade Feature/Pit:
If a subsurface feature, pit or impoundment be discovered during site development, excavation and
activities in the vicinity of the feature will be placed on hold and the discovery will be reported to
the environmental consultant. The consultant will assess the situation and report to the DEQ within
48 hours of discovery. Any contents of the feature will be evaluated, analyzed, and disposed of at a
licensed offsite facility in accordance with regulatory requirements and DEQ approval. The
subsurface feature will be removed in accordance with applicable NCDEQ UST or IHSB regulation,
surrounding soil and soil at the base of the feature will be screened with a photoionization detector
(PID) and flame ionization detector (FID), the breathing zone will be monitored using a PID/FID, and
confirmatory sampling and/or remedial activities will be conducted to the satisfaction of DEQ, which
will include all applicable sampling locations including the base of the feature.
Buried Waste Material:
Should buried waste material be discovered during excavation activities, the contractor will
immediately notify the environmental consultant. The consultant will assess the situation and
report to the DEQ within 48 hours of discovery. The contents of the waste material will tank will be
evaluated, analyzed, and disposed of at a licensed offsite facility in accordance with regulatory
requirements and DEQ approval. The waste material will be removed in accordance with applicable
NCDEQ Solid Waste or IHSB regulation, surrounding soil and soil at the base of the feature will be
screened with a photoionization detector (PID) and flame ionization detector (FID), the breathing
zone will be monitored using a PID/FID, and confirmatory sampling and/or remedial activities will be
conducted to the satisfaction of DEQ, which will include all applicable sampling locations including
the base of the waste material.
Re-Use of Impacted Soils On-Site:
Coordinate with the NCDEQ regarding required sampling and placement.
23
EMP Version 2, June 2018
If unknown, impacted soil is identified on-site, management on-site can be considered after the
project team provides the necessary information, outlined in Part 1.A. Item 11, for Brownfields
Project Manager approval prior to final placement on-site.
If other potential contingency plans are pertinent, please provide other details or scenarios as
needed below:
The environmental consultant will be notified in the event that other indications of potential
environmental concern or impact are identified at the site and report discoveries to DEQ within 48-
hours.
POST‐REDEVELOPMENT REPORTING
☒ Check this box to acknowledge that a Redevelopment Summary Report will be required for the
project. If the project duration is longer than one year, an annual update is required and will be
due by January 31 of each year, or 30 days after each one-year anniversary of the effective date of
this EMP (as agreed upon with the Project Manager). These reports will be required for as long as
physical redevelopment of the Brownfields Property continues, except that the final
Redevelopment Summary Report will be submitted within 90 days after completion of
redevelopment. Based on the estimated construction schedule, the first Redevelopment Summary
Report is anticipated to be submitted on 1/31/2021
The Redevelopment Summary Report shall include environment-related activities since the last
report, with a summary and drawings, that describes:
1. actions taken on the Brownfields Property;
2. soil grading and cut and fill actions;
3. methodology(ies) employed for field screening, sampling and laboratory analysis of
environmental media;
4. stockpiling, containerizing, decontaminating, treating, handling, laboratory analysis and
ultimate disposition of any soil, groundwater or other materials suspected or confirmed
to be contaminated with regulated substances; and
5. removal of any contaminated soil, water or other contaminated materials (for example,
concrete, demolition debris) from the Brownfields Property (copies of all legally required
manifests shall be included).
☒ Check box to acknowledge consent to provide a NC licensed P.G. or P.E. sealed, Redevelopment
Summary Report in compliance with the site’s Brownfields Agreement.
l
' ..
j
~
~ I
i
'! :1
:1
! ;' -~
\j
' j
J ·l -1 .,
1 j
._,
~ 'i
{
)
·l • 1
. !
·;
APPROVAL SIGNATURES
Brownfields Project Number: 09042-05-()90
Brownfields Project Name: Former Scott Aviation
Prospective eveloper: City of Monroe
Printed Name/Title/Company: E.L. Faison
Consultant: Resolve Environmental Services, PLLC
Printed Name/Title/Company: Laura Minor (Ops. Mgr.)
Brownfields Proje
24
EMP Version 2, June 2018
I
Date 12/26/2019
Date 12/26/2019
Oat Click or tap to enter a date .
25
EMP Version 2, June 2018
H
Y
D
WV
WV
H
Y
D
WV
DY
H
WV
WV
D
WV
WV
WV
WVWV
WV
GV
WV
WV WV
WV
WV
D
WV
WVGV
WV
WV
WV
D
Y
H
GVD
D
D
D
D
DYH
BUILDING PAD
POLICE STATION
= 589.00
Wash
Bay
40' Public R/W
N 452752.67
E 1535021.75
Monument Found
Iron Found
W. Crowell Street
N. Crawford StreetW. Jefferson Street Charlotte Avenue40' Public R\W 60' Public R\W (Part of which
is recorded in Db. 200, Pg. 482)80' Public R\W (Recorded in Db. 253, Pg. 153, Db. 254, Pg, 629 & Db. 254, Pg. 639)35 MPH Posted5 90 .1 7 5 8 9 .37 5 8 8.7 3591.6 4593.3 4
5 7 5 .09
5 7 7.6 1
5 7 3 .3 4
5 7 1 .5 4
5 6 7 .5 1
5 7 9 .46
56 8 .9 8
5 7 0.7 4
5 8 8 .24
6 0 2 .3 9601.7 5
6 02 .2 0
6 0 2 .54
60 2 .8 1
60 3 .0 4
6 0 3 .7 7
6 0 4.0 9
6 0 2 .1 5
6 0 2 .9 6
6 0 3 .7 4
6 0 5 .3 1
6 0 5 .7 5
6 0 6 .3 7
6 0 6 .7 8
6 0 6 .7 3
6 0 6 .5 8
6 0 2 .5 3
6 0 1.7 2
60 5 .5 0 6 0 5 .8 0
60 5 .3 7 60 3 .7 1 6 0 1 .8 7
6 00 .1 0 5 9 8 .71 59 6 .7 3 59 3 .6 9 5 9 0 .40 5 8 8 .66 5 8 6.9 0
6 0 2.9 4
FUTURE
ADDITION
BUILDING PAD
FIRE STATION
SENIOR CENTER
BUILDING PAD
NEW UPPERCANOPY ABOVE= 608'-8"
HC
HC
HC
57 7.7 5
588.9
590.1
580.75
5 8 6
= 582.5
5 8 8 .8
588.9
5 8 8.85
8
8.
3
5 8 2 .8 L P
5 8 8 .3 588.36 02
6 00
5 9 6 586.3 HP5 8 5 .5 L P
5 9 4
5 9 2
5 9 8
590.0
585.25
584.8585.05
587.30
585.5
584.35 5 83 .55
582.2 LP
= 583.5
6%3%
568.25
582.4
582.4
5 8 8.8
5 8 7 .3 5 5 8 7 .3 5
608'-7 1_
2"
24" C&G
24" C&G
598.4
608.67
608.60607.7
10.83' @ 1:12 (8.33%)
Landing
Landing
607.65
Landing
608.60
60 2.9 0 10' @ 1:12 (8.33%)608.50
Moved Canopy8'606.82606.7606.35 606.8224.5' @ 6.86%6 06.45
606.7604.60
604.85
604.75
605.0
6 03 .3 5 6 03 .7
60 3.2 5
604.25
583
5 8 3
590
5 8 7 .0
586.3
5885
6
8
592
588587
604598604600602 594
593
5965985
9
8
5
9
6
5
9
4
592
590
6005
9
9
590
589
5
9
6
575
578578580588584
580
584
586
588 58758
2
5
8
1 5805
81584586585
584
586
5 8 8
5 8 9
588590
592592594
594596598600602 5785745701%6
0
4 608606
606
580
5 8 4
576
560
565
565565
570570570
570
570
575
575
575
575
5755 7 5
580
580
580
580
585
585
585
590
590
590
590
5 9 0
590
595
595
595
595595
5 9 5
600
600
600
6006 0 0
6 0 5
605
6056056 0 5
605566
5 6 7
5 6 9
572573
5 7 3
577
577581
581
5 8 1
5 8 2
582
583
583
5
8
3
586
586
588
589
591591
592
593594
594596
597
5 9 7
598
598599
6 0 1
602
6 0 2
602603
603603604604604604606606606SpeedHump30"Oak
36"Oak
SignSign
Sign Sign
Sign
Sign
Sign
Sign
Sign
Sign
Concrete walk
Gravel driveway serving adj.
lot crosses the property line
Gravel drivewayPavement of former street
legally closed by the City of Monroe
DB. 296 Pg. 358
Existing Tax Parcel LineAsphalt paved
parking lot
10'x 70' Sight Triangle
35'x 35' Sight Triangle
30' GPUE 30' GPUE10' GPUE 10' GPUE & Sidewalk Easement**Sidewalk Easement along
Charlotte Avenue only.
PK Nail
Found
Iron Found
Iron Found
Iron Found
Dimple in
Sidwealk
Iron Found
CL Road CL RoadCL RoadIron found
Found
PK Nail
Nail
Found
Iron
Found
IronFound
Iron found
Iron Found
Iron Found
Found
PK Nail
Iron
Found
Iron Found
Iron Found
Iron found
Iron Found
Iron
Found
DropInlet 48"RCPCulvert36"RCPSDMH
Rim 593.32
In 580.54
Out 580.30
SDMH
Rim 595.79
In 583.43 (Culvert)
In 590.54 (15"RCP)
Out 582.53
36"RCP60"RCP36"RCPEx. CB
Rim 589.55
In 577.51 (E)
In 575.07 (S)
Out 574.96 (N)
SDMH
Rim 589.26
In 578.32
Out 577.9660"RCP15"RCP
18"RCP
SDMH
Rim 586.94
In 573.30 (S)
In 580.27 (E)
In 581.77 (W)
In 580.36 (NW)
Out 570.82 (N)
CB
Rim 571.96
In. 562.30 (S)
In. 566.75 (E)
Out 562.03 (N)
30"RCP60"RCP60"RCP
Junction Box
(Covered)
Elev. 566.70
60"RCP
Inv. 562.06
CB
Rim 569.65
In 566.91
Out 566.78
15"RCP
30"RCP
SDMH
Rim 572.55
In 567.63
Out 567.32
CB
Rim 572.81
In 568.61
Out 568.45
30"RCPCB
Rim 575.67
In 572.16 (SW)
In 571.17 (E)
Out 570.98 (NW)
1 5 "R CP
CB
Rim 578.61
Out 575.38
CB
Rim 590.15
In 584.65
Out 584.27
CB
Rim 590.70
In 587.61 (SW)
In 587.63 (SE)
Out 587.27 (N)
CB
Rim 593.45
Out 589.04
CB
Rim 593.11
In 587.96
Out 587.9315"RCP15"RCP18"RCP15"RCP
15"RCPCB
Rim 586.95
Out 580.92
JB (Covered)
Rim 587.09
CB
Rim 587.41
In 584.93
Out 584.85 15"RCPDI
CB
Rim 596.18
Out 592.81
CB
Rim 0000
In 584.12 (SW)
In 584.06 (S)
Out 583.91 (N)48"RCPCB
Rim 596.39
In 588.41
Out 588.34
CB
Rim 596.25
Out 588.8315"RCP15"RC P48"RCPEx. DI
Rim 598.68
15"RCP 15"RCPSDMH
Rim 603.56
DI
Rim 605.05 1 5 "RCP
Telephone
Hole
Telephone
Hole
100 Year Flood Line
(Scaled from GIS)NC GRIDNC Grid Coordinates
Transformer
Electric
Old TransformerConcrete Pad
CONC. PIT
CONC.
CONC.
WM
WM
WM
WM
Water Valve
Fire Hydrant
Water Valve
WM
WM
WM WVEx. Asphalt
Ex. Asphalt
WV
D
Y
H
WV
WV
608
608
606
607608609
36"Oak
30"Oak
36"Oak
30"Oak
Sign
Sign
Sign
Gravel driveway serving adj.
lot crosses the property line
Sidewalk
Iron Set
Iron found
Iron Found
Iron
Found
Iron Found
Drop
Inlet
DI
Rim 605.05
In 601.96
Out 600.97
12"RCP15"RCP 1 5"RCP
Telephone Box
Fiber Optic Box
WM
2.03
1
SLIDING SECURITY GATE "B"
42" SWINGING
SECURITY GATE "B"
16' SWINGING
SECURITY GATE "A"
SLIDING SECURITY GATE "A"
DECORATIVE
SECURITY FENCE
& COLUMNS
DECORATIVE SECURITY
FENCE & COLUMNS
CARD READER & PEDESTAL BY OWNER
CARD READER &
PEDESTAL BY OWNER
CARD READER &
PEDESTAL BY OWNER
CURB & GUTTER
BOLLARDS
CHAINLINK
SECURITY FENCE
SIGHT TRIANGLE
BOLLARDS
BOLLARDS
BOLLARDS
CHAINLINK
SECURITY
FENCE
CHAINLINK
SECURITY FENCE
CHAINLINK
SECURITY FENCE
CHAINLINK
SECURITY FENCE
DECORATIVE SECURITY
FENCE & COLUMNS
DECORATIVE SECURITY
FENCE & COLUMNS
2.04
6 SimTYP
DECORATIVE SECURITY FENCE
2.04
8 SimTYP 2.04
9 SimTYP
SLIDING
SECURITY
GATE "C"
CARD READER &
PEDESTAL BY OWNER
BOLLARD
2.04
6 SimTYP
DECORATIVE
MASONRY VENEER
COLUMN EA SIDE
OF SLIDING
SECURITY GATE
2.04
5
SimTYP
1
2.05
SimTYP
SEGMENTAL RETAINING
WALL & GUARDRAIL
2.05
4
TYP
LANDSCAPE PLANTING
BED, TYP. REFERENCE
LANDSCAPE DWGS
BOLLARDS
10
2.05
TYP
2.05
11
2.05
11 SIM
GRASS SEED; REF
LANDSCAPE
GRASS SEED; REF LANDSCAPE
LANDSCAPE BED;
REF LANDSCAPE
LANDSCAPE BED; REF LANDSCAPE
LANDSCAPE BED;
REF LANDSCAPE
LANDSCAPE BED;
REF LANDSCAPE
LANDSCAPE BED;
REF LANDSCAPE
LP
LP
LP LP LP LP LP LP
LP
LP
LP
LP
LP
LP
LP LP
LP LP
LP
LP LP
LP LP
LP
LP LP
LP LP
LPLPLPLP
LP LP
LP LP
LPLP
LP LP LP
LP LP
LP
LP
LP
LP
LP
LPLPLP
LP
LP LP
LP
LP LP
(3) -4" PVC CONDUIT
(4) -4" PVC CONDUIT
(4) -4" PVC CONDUIT
(1) -3" PVC CONDUIT
(1) -3" PVC CONDUIT
(1) -3" PVC CONDUIT
(1) -3" PVC CONDUIT
(1) -3" PVC CONDUIT
(1) -3" PVC CONDUIT(1) -3" PVC CONDUIT
(1) -3" PVC CONDUIT(1) -3" PVC CONDUIT
(1) -3" PVC CONDUIT
(1) -3" PVC CONDUIT
(1) -3" PVC
CONDUIT
(1) -3" PVC CONDUIT
(1) -3" PVC CONDUIT
(1) -3" PVC CONDUIT
(1) -3" PVC CONDUIT
(1) -3" PVC CONDUIT(1) -3" PVC CONDUIT
(1) -3" PVC CONDUIT
/2 2.00/2 2.00
TRANSFORMER
TRANSFORMER
IRRIGATION BOX(1) -4" PVC CONDUIT
IRRIGATION BOX
IRRIGATION BOX
IRRIGATION BOX
IRRIGATION BOX
(1) -4" PVC CONDUIT
(1) -4" PVC CONDUIT
(1) -4" PVC CONDUIT
IRRIGATION BOX
(1) -4" PVC CONDUIT
(1) -4" PVC CONDUIT
(1) -4" PVC
CONDUIT
(1) -4" PVC
CONDUIT
(1) -4" PVC CONDUIT
(1) -4" PVC
CONDUIT
(1) -4" PVC
CONDUIT
(1) -4" PVC
CONDUIT
(1) -4" PVC CONDUIT
IRRIGATION BOXIRRIGATION BOX
IRRIGATION BOX
IRRIGATION BOX
(1) -4" PVC CONDUIT
(1) -4" PVC CONDUIT
(1) -4" PVC CONDUIT
(1) -4" PVC CONDUIT
(1) -4" PVC CONDUIT
IRRIGATION BOX
IRRIGATION
BOX
IRRIGATION
BOX
IRRIGATION
BOX
(1) -4" PVC CONDUIT
(1) -4" PVC CONDUIT
SEGMENTAL
RETAINING WALL
OIL/WATER
SEPARATOR
CARD READER &
PEDESTAL BY OWNER
IRRIGATION BOX
(1) -4" PVC CONDUIT
IRRIGATION BOX
EXISTING OVERHEAD
ELECTRIC LINE
3-PH UNDERGROUND
PRIMARY IN 4" PVC CONDUIT
3-PH UNDERGROUND
PRIMARY IN 4" PVC CONDUIT
/1 2.00/1 2.00
Project No.
Date:1.800.671.0621www.scn-architects.comSheet No.719 East Second AvenueGastonia, NC 28054Phone: 704.865.6311Fax: 704.865.0046Drawn by:
Checked by:
Revisions:
ALL NOTES APPLY TO ALL DRAWINGS AND ALL TRADES. IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF ALL CONTRACTORS AND
TRADES TO COORDINATE THE INSTALLATION OF THEIR WORK WITH THE INSTALLATION OF WORK BY ALL OTHER
CONTRACTORS AND TRADES. THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE DRAWINGS, GENERAL REQUIREMENTS AND ALL ITEMS
OF THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS ARE EQUALLY BINDING ON ALL CONTRACTORS AND TRADES. EACH
CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO MAINTAIN FULL SETS OF THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS FOR HIS EMPLOYEES USE
ON THE PROJECT TO ASSURE THAT ALL WORK IS PROPERLY COORDINATED AND INSTALLED WITH THE WORK OF
OTHER CONTRACTORS AND TRADES.
WHENEVER THERE ARE DISCREPANCIES BETWEEN DRAWINGS, OR BETWEEN THE DRAWINGS AND
SPECIFICATIONS, OR CONFLICTS WITHIN THE SPECIFICATIONS AND/OR DRAWINGS, AND SUCH DISCREPANCY IS
NOT CALLED TO THE ARCHITECT'S ATTENTION IN TIME TO PERMIT CLARIFICATION BY ADDENDUM, THE
CONTRACTOR SHALL BASE HIS BID UPON PROVIDING THE BETTER QUALITY OR GREATER OF WORK OR MATERIAL
CALLED FOR, SHALL SUBMIT A WRITTEN STATEMENT WITH HIS PROPOSAL NOTING SUCH DISCREPANCIES, AND
SHALL SO FURNISH AND INSTALL SUCH BETTER QUALITY OR GREATER QUANTITY UNLESS OTHERWISE ORDERED
IN WRITING.
NOTE
1/17/2020 2:43:19 PM
1603
SMC
Checker
2.00MONROE POLICE STATIONARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN - OVERALLMONROE, NCP R O G R E S S
D O C U M E N T
No. Description Date
Scale:1" = 30'-0"1 SITE PLAN - ARCHITECTURAL
0'15'30'60'120'
T
N
P
N
Scale:1" = 30'-0"2 SITE PLAN - SENIOR CENTER OVERFLOW PARKING
0'15'30'60'120'
T
N
P
N
Sample Date Units
AcetoneBenzeneBromomethane 2-Butanone (MEK)Carbon disulfide ChloroformChloromethane Dichlorodifluoromethane 1,1-Dichloroethenen-Heptane n-Hexane2-Hexanone Methylene Chloride NaphthaleneTetrachloroetheneToluene1,1,1-TrichloroethaneTrichloroetheneTrichlorofluoromethane 1,1,2-Trichlorotrifluoroethane 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene Total XylenesSV-13 8/30/2019 8.33E+01 5.00E+00 2.10E+00 1.48E+01 1.30E+00 6.80E+00 1.50E+00 2.50E+00 8.02E+01 1.0J 9.00E+00 3.7J 5.05E+01 3.4J 1.48E+04 2.90E+00 3.87E+01 3.20E+02 3.30E+00 5.62E+02 1.2J 2.3J
SV-14 8/30/2019 1.28E+02 4.00E+00 <4.6E-01 5.18E+02 2.01E+01 2.80E+00 <3.20E-01 2.50E+00 1.24E+03 <7.70E-01 5.40E+00 6.3J 2.97E+01 <2.70E+00 4.52E+03 6.10E+00 2.62E+01 2.11E+02 4.80E+00 1.09E+03 1.3J 4.1J
2.70E+06 1.60E+03 4.40E+02 4.40E+05 6.10E+04 5.30E+02 7.90E+03 8.80E+03 7.70E+03 3.50E+04 6.10E+04 2.60E+03 5.30E+04 2.60E+02 3.50E+03 4.40E+05 4.40E+05 1.80E+02 NE NE 5.30E+03 3.20E+02
NC Vapor Intrusion
SubSlab Screening
Levels
Analytical Method
µg/m3
TO-15
Former Scott Avaiation
Parcel 2 Sub-Slab Vapor Moniroring Results
Brownfields Project # 09402-05-090
Table 1
WellIDDateCollectedSB41-S-2' 12/20/1612,000 69.7 22.4 3.1SB41-I-8' 12/20/161,210 63.5 31SB41-D-16' 12/20/16939 28 11.6 8.9SB42-S-2' 12/20/16445 13,700 3,650SB42-I-6' 12/20/16702 2,990 46.7SB42-D-11' 12/20/16336 98.5 4.5SB43-S-2' 12/20/162,390 5,600 241SB43-I-4' 12/20/16867 123 35.1 5SB43-D-16' 12/20/164,080 765 239SB44-S-2' 12/20/1615.2SB44-I-10' 12/20/16937 95.2 32.3 19SB44-D-18' 12/20/1628.8SB45-S-2' 12/20/16286SB45-I-6' 12/20/1654,700 2.4SB45-D-12' 12/20/1639.9SB46-S-2' 12/20/161,810SB46-I-8' 12/20/1625,400 50.9SB46-D-16' 12/20/16423 1,340 4.4 111SB47-S-2' 12/20/1666.2SB47-I-6' 12/20/163,200SB48-S-2' 12/20/1641SB49-S-2' 12/20/1627.2Contaminant of ConcernCIS-1,2-DichloroetheneVinyl chlorideTetrachloroetheneTrichloroethene
WellIDDateCollectedSV-4 07/15/16 38.8SV-507/15/16 SV-607/15/16116 112SV-7 07/15/1652.2 44.1SV-8 07/15/1629.7SV-9 07/15/1626.8SV-10 07/15/16111 40.5NaphthaleneContaminant of Concern1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene