Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSLAS7823_INSP_20190816FACILITY COMPLIANCE INSPECTION REPORT Division of Waste Management Solid Waste Section Page 1 of 2 UNIT TYPE: Lined MSWLF LCID YW Transfer Compost SLAS X COUNTY: Robeson Closed MSWLF HHW White goods Incin T&P FIRM PERMIT NO.: SLAS 78-23 CDLF Tire T&P / Collection Tire Monofill Industrial Landfill DEMO SDTF FILE TYPE: COMPLIANCE Date of Site Inspection: 8/16/2019 Date of Last Inspection: 7/12/2019 FACILITY NAME AND ADDRESS: Belton’s Septic Tank Service P.O. Box 64067 Fayetteville, NC 28306 GPS COORDINATES: N: 34.92999 E: -79.05242 FACILITY CONTACT NAME AND PHONE NUMBER: Name: Maxine & Frankie Jones Telephone: (910) 425-8876 Email address: Frankiejones2005@gmail.com Fax: (910) 425-1497 FACILITY CONTACT ADDRESS: 898 Camden Road Raeford, NC 28376 PARTICIPANTS: Connie Wylie, Frankie Jones STATUS OF PERMIT: Active – permit expires November 19, 2023 PURPOSE OF SITE VISIT: Routine STATUS OF PAST NOTED VIOLATIONS: N/A OBSERVED VIOLATIONS: N/A SEE BACK OF PAGE The item(s) listed above were observed by Section staff and require action on behalf of the facility in order to come into or maintain compliance with the Statutes, Rules, and/or other regulatory requirements applicable to this facility. Be advised that pursuant to N.C.G.S. 130A-22, an administrative penalty of up to $15,000 per day may be assessed for each violation of the Solid Waste Laws, Regulations, Conditions of a Permit, or Order under Article 9 of Chapter 130A of the N.C. General Statutes. Further, the facility and/or all responsible parties may also be subject to enforcement actions including penalties, injunction from operation of a solid waste management facility or a solid waste collection service and any such further relief as may be necessary to achieve compliance with the North Carolina Solid Waste Management Act and Rules. FACILITY COMPLIANCE INSPECTION REPORT Division of Waste Management Solid Waste Section Page 2 of 2 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 1. Met Mr. Jones to discuss possible expansion on the north side of the permitted site. Based on the previously submitted report it appears that the original site evaluation did not include any additional area past the currently permitted fields. Instructed Mr. Jones to contact the individual who had done the site evaluation to confirm this. Any additional area to possibly be added to the permitted disposal acreage will need a site evaluation report & soil samples (to include the heavy metals analysis). The possible expansion area has a groundcover that is becoming established at this time. 2. Per Rule .0841(d)(15) the 500 setback from a disposal field to a well can be reduced to 250 feet when the land within the setback area has 95% permanent established grass or forest cover. Therefore, the required distance from a well at Mr. Jones proposed house to the disposal field could be 250 feet of permanent established grass. The required distance from a proposed well at the playground area on the far side of the creek to the disposal field would have to be 500 feet because the setback area would include possibly part of the access path and the creek itself (which would not be permanent established grass or forest cover). 3. Per discussion with the Raleigh Central office just the use of a maximizer at the SDTF would not allow for an increase in the application rate for this site. A higher application rate is permitted based on the treatment of septage (such as dewatering which causes a reduction in the nitrogen concentration) or the crop’s nitrogen requirement based on RYE for that site. To be permitted for a higher application rate also requires the operator to be certified in the Land Residuals Course (held thru NC State), run a public notice and submit a revised nutrient management plan. 4. Discussed with Mr. Jones the missing field markers that were noted on the north side of the site during the last site visit. Reviewed the site map with Mr. Jones. Enclosed is a copy of the site map with approximate distances for the missing markers. Please repost the missing field markers. 5. The cropstand has improved since the last visit. Continue efforts to control weeds & maintain the Bermuda cropstand. Noted just small patches of thin or bare vegetation. Establish the winter cover crop this fall as per the approved nutrient management plan. 6. Discussed that the 30 day waiting period between the last application of septage and the harvest of the crop also applies to a 30 day wait before a field can be grazed by cattle. 7. The hay bales currently sitting on the east side of the site need to be removed (appears to be starting to rot). 8. No apparent sign of land application outside the permitted boundaries. No sign of heavy or recent application. No apparent sign of a grease burn due to inadequately diluted grease. No odors noted. 9. It appears that the approved setbacks are being met at this time but were not measured during this visit. 10. The required signs are posted (at both entrances) and the main access road is adequate. Please contact me if you have any questions or concerns regarding this inspection report. Phone: (910) 433-3352 Connie S. Wylie Regional Representative Sent on: Email Hand delivery X US Mail Certified No. [ _]