60H_ThomasRd_Phase I ESA_2016

PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT
OF

THOMAS ROAD SITE
14816 THOMAS ROAD
CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA 28278

ATC PROJECT NO. 199HOP1610

DECEMBER 1, 2016

Prepared by: Prepared for:

ATC Group Services, LLC Mr. Clay McCullough
7606 Whitehall Executive Center Drive Hopper Communities
Charlotte, North Carolina 28273 229 East Kingston Avenue
Phone: [phone] Charlotte, North Carolina 28203
Fax: [phone]

PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT
Thomas Road Site
14816 Thomas Road
Charlotte, North Carolina 28278

Project No. 199HOP1610 i ATC Group Services LLC

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................. 1
1.1 General Information............................................................................................................................. 1
1.2 Findings and Conclusions Summary ................................................................................................... 2
1.3 Significant Data Gap Summary ........................................................................................................... 3
1.4 Recommendations .............................................................................................................................. 3
2.0 INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................. 4
2.1 Purpose ............................................................................................................................................... 4
2.2 Scope .................................................................................................................................................. 4
2.3 Significant Assumption ........................................................................................................................ 4
2.4 Limitations and Exceptions .................................................................................................................. 4
2.5 Special Terms and Conditions (User Reliance) .................................................................................. 7
3.0 SITE DESCRIPTION ......................................................................................................... 8
3.1 Location and Legal Description ........................................................................................................... 8
3.2 Surrounding Area General Characteristics.......................................................................................... 8
3.3 Current Use of the Property ................................................................................................................ 8
3.4 Description of Property Improvements ................................................................................................ 8
3.5 Current Uses of Adjoining Properties .................................................................................................. 9
4.0 USER PROVIDED INFORMATION ................................................................................ 10
4.1 Title Records ..................................................................................................................................... 10
4.2 Environmental Liens or Activity and Use Limitations (AULs) ............................................................ 10
4.3 Specialized Knowledge or Experience of the User ........................................................................... 10
4.4 Significant Valuation Reduction for Environmental Issues ................................................................ 10
4.5 Owner, Property Manager and Occupant Information....................................................................... 10
4.6 Reason for Performing Phase I ESA ................................................................................................. 10
4.7 Other User Provided Documents ...................................................................................................... 10
5.0 RECORDS REVIEW ....................................................................................................... 11
5.1 Standard Environmental Records ..................................................................................................... 11
5.1.1 Federal Agency Database Findings .................................................................................... 12
5.1.2 State and Tribal Database Findings .................................................................................... 12
5.1.3 Local Environmental Records Sources ............................................................................... 12
5.2 Physical Setting Sources ................................................................................................................... 13
5.2.1 Topography ......................................................................................................................... 13
5.2.2 Geology ............................................................................................................................... 13
5.2.3 Soils ..................................................................................................................................... 13
5.2.4 Hydrology ............................................................................................................................ 13
5.2.5 Other Physical Setting Sources ........................................................................................... 14
5.3 Historical Records Sources ............................................................................................................... 14
5.3.1 Aerial Photographs .............................................................................................................. 15
5.3.2 Fire Insurance Maps............................................................................................................ 16
5.3.3 Property Tax Files ............................................................................................................... 16
5.3.4 Recorded Land Title Records ............................................................................................. 16
5.3.5 Historical USGS Topographic Maps ................................................................................... 16
5.3.6 City Directories .................................................................................................................... 17
5.3.7 Building Department Records ............................................................................................. 17
5.3.8 Zoning/Land Use Records................................................................................................... 17
5.3.9 Prior Reports ....................................................................................................................... 17
5.3.10 Other Historical Sources ..................................................................................................... 17
PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT
Thomas Road Site
14816 Thomas Road
Charlotte, North Carolina 28278

Project No. 199HOP1610 ii ATC Group Services LLC
6.0 SITE RECONNAISSANCE ............................................................................................. 18
6.1 Methodology and Limiting Conditions ................................................................................................ 18
6.2 Hazardous Substance Use, Storage, and Disposal .......................................................................... 18
6.3 Underground Storage Tanks (USTs) ................................................................................................ 18
6.4 Aboveground Storage Tanks (ASTs) ................................................................................................ 18
6.5 Other Petroleum Products ................................................................................................................. 18
6.6 Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) ..................................................................................................... 18
6.7 Unidentified Substance Containers ................................................................................................... 18
6.8 Nonhazardous Solid Waste ............................................................................................................... 19
6.9 Wastewater ....................................................................................................................................... 19
6.10 Waste Pits, Ponds and Lagoons ....................................................................................................... 19
6.11 Drains and Sumps ............................................................................................................................. 19
6.12 Septic Systems .................................................................................................................................. 20
6.13 Storm water Management System .................................................................................................... 20
6.14 Wells ................................................................................................................................................. 20
7.0 SUBSURFACE VAPOR MIGRATION ............................................................................. 21
8.0 INTERVIEWS.................................................................................................................. 22
9.0 OTHER ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS .................................................................... 23
9.1 Asbestos-Containing Materials (ACM) .............................................................................................. 23
9.2 Radon ................................................................................................................................................ 23
9.3 Lead in Drinking Water ...................................................................................................................... 23
9.4 Lead-Based Paint (LBP) .................................................................................................................... 23
9.5 Mold Screening ................................................................................................................................. 23
9.6 Additional User Requested Conditions .............................................................................................. 23
10.0 REFERENCES ............................................................................................................... 24
11.0 APPENDICES ................................................................................................................. 25

APPENDIX A SITE VICINITY MAP
APPENDIX B SITE PLAN
APPENDIX C SITE PHOTOGRAPHS
APPENDIX D USER PROVIDED DOCUMENTATION
APPENDIX E REGULATORY DATABASE REPORT
APPENDIX F AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHS
APPENDIX G HISTORICAL RESEARCH DOCUMENTATION
APPENDIX H PRIOR REPORTS
APPENDIX I RESUMES
APPENDIX J RECORDS OF COMMUNICATION
APPENDIX K LABORATORY REPORTS
APPENDIX L OTHER SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION
APPEN DIX M TERMINOLOGY
PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT
Thomas Road Site
14816 Thomas Road
Charlotte, North Carolina 28278

Project No. 199HOP1610 1 ATC Group Services LLC
1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

1.1 General Information

Project Information: Site Information:
Residential Property and Undeveloped Land Thomas Road Site
199HOP1610 14816 Thomas Road
Charlotte, North Carolina 28278
Mecklenburg County
Consultant Information: Site Access Contact:
ATC Group Services LLC (ATC) Mr. Larry Core
7606 Whitehall Executive Center Drive SouthEast Commercial Real Estate Group Inc.
Charlotte, North Carolina 28273 Client Information:
Telephone: [phone] Mr. Clay McCullough
Fax: [phone] Hopper Communities
Reconnaissance Date: September 29, 2016 229 East Kingston Avenue
Site Assessor: Natalie K. Waldner Charlotte, North Carolina 28203
Reviewer: David A. Hunter, P.G. Phone: [phone]
Environmental Professionals: Natalie K. Waldner
David A. Hunter, P.G.

Environmental Professional Statement:
We declare that, to the best of our professional knowledge and belief, we meet the definition of
Environmental Professionals as defined in § 312.10 part of 40 CFR 312. We have the specific
qualifications based on education, training and experience to assess a property of the nature, history and
setting of the property. We have developed and performed the all appropriate inquiries in conformance
with the standards and practices set forth in 40 CFR Part 312.

Natalie K. Waldner
Project Manager/Site Assessor/Environmental Professional

David A. Hunter, P.G.
Principal Scientist/Reviewer/Environmental Professional

PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT
Thomas Road Site
14816 Thomas Road
Charlotte, North Carolina 28278

Project No. 199HOP1610 2 ATC Group Services LLC
1.2 Findings and Conclusions Summary

ATC has performed this Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) in conformance with the scope
and limitations of ASTM Standard Practice E 1527-13. Any exceptions to, or deletions from, this practice
are described in Section 2.0 of this report. This assessment has revealed no evidence of recognized
environmental conditions in connection with the property.

FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS SUMMARY
Report Section Further
Action?
De minimis
Condition
REC
and/or
CREC
Historical
REC
ASTM Non-
Scope
Condition
Description
4.0 User Provided Information No
5.1.1 Federal Database Findings No
5.1.2 State and Tribal Database
Findings
No
5.1.3 Local Environmental Record
Sources
Yes X See Note #1
5.3 Historical Records Sources No
6.2 Hazardous Substance Use,
Storage and Disposal
No
6.3 Underground Storage Tanks No
6.4 Aboveground Storage Tanks No
6.5 Other Petroleum Products No
6.6 Polychlorinated Biphenyls
(PCBs)
No
6.7 Unidentified Substance
Containers
Yes X See Note #2
6.8 Nonhazardous Solid Waste Yes X See Note #2
6.9 Wastewater No
6.10 Waste Pits, Ponds and Lagoons No
6.11 Sumps No
6.12 Septic Systems No
6.13 Stormwater Management System No
6.14 Wells No
7.0 Subsurface Vapor Migration No
8.0 Interviews No
9.1 Asbestos-Containing Material
(ACM)
No
9.2 Radon No
9.3 Lead in Drinking Water No
9.4 Lead-Based Paint (LBP) No
9.5 Mold Screening No
9.6 Additional User Requested
Services
No

Note #1: According to the regulatory database, the property is an inactive former demolition landfill. File
review information obtained from the Mecklenburg County Environmental Health Department Groundwater
and Wastewater Services revealed that the S.S. Giles Landfill was located at 14816 Thomas Road, the
current address of the on-site residence. This landfill was operated as a demolition landfill by Blythe
Industries from January 8, 1985 to December 23, 1987. According to additional documentation from the
file review, the property is on the Mecklenburg County Priority List (MPL), and as a requirement at MPL
sites, the County sampled four water supply wells in the vicinity of the landfill in February 2003. No
contaminants were detected in the nearby water supply wells. ATC’s geotechnical services department
mobilized to the property on October 31, 2016, and uncovered and removed buried trash, including
landscape debris, and other inert construction debris, including bricks and masonry block. No solid or
hazardous waste was discovered. Based on the nonhazardous nature of the debris uncovered at the
property and the lack of contamination found in area water supply wells, the operation of a former
demolition landfill at the property represents a de minimis condition.

Note #2: ATC observed two apparent fuel tanks (~300 and ~500 gallon capacities) with other debris on
the property, and an area near an old storage shed had apparent pesticide or herbicide application
containers mixed with other small volume containers. The presence of the tanks, containers, and other
debris is considered a de minimis condition.
PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT
Thomas Road Site
14816 Thomas Road
Charlotte, North Carolina 28278

Project No. 199HOP1610 3 ATC Group Services LLC

1.3 Significant Data Gap Summary

Data gaps may have been encountered during the performance of this Phase I ESA and are discussed
within the section of the report where they were encountered. However, according to ASTM Standard
Practice E 1527-13, data gaps are only significant if "other information and/or professional experience
raise reasonable concerns involving the data gap." The following is a summary of significant data gaps
identified in this report.
SIGNIFICANT DATA GAP SUMMARY
Report Section Description
3.5 Current Uses of Adjoining Properties No significant data gap identified.
4.2 Environmental Liens or Activity and
Use Limitations (AULs)
No significant data gap identified.
5.1 Standard Environmental Records No significant data gap identified.
5.2 Physical Setting Sources No significant data gap identified.
5.3 Historical Records Sources No significant data gap identified.
6.1 Methodology and Limiting Conditions No significant data gap identified.
7.0 Interviews No significant data gap identified.

1.4 Recommendations

Based on information collected from the Phase I ESA, ATC offers the following recommendations:

 Removal and proper disposal of the debris observed at the property.
 Removal and proper disposal of the tanks and containers with shallow soil field observations to
assess the potential for tank content releases.
PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT
Thomas Road Site
14816 Thomas Road
Charlotte, North Carolina 28278

Project No. 199HOP1610 4 ATC Group Services LLC
2.0 INTRODUCTION

2.1 Purpose

The purpose of this Phase I ESA was to identify recognized environmental conditions and certain potential
environmental conditions outside the scope of ASTM Standard Practice E 1527-13 in connection with the
property at the time of the site reconnaissance. This report documents the findings, opinions and
conclusions of the Phase I ESA.

2.2 Scope

This Phase I ESA was conducted in general accordance with the ASTM Standard Practice E 1527-13,
consistent with a level of care and skill ordinarily practiced by the environmental consulting profession
currently providing similar services under similar circumstances. Significant additions, deletions or
exceptions to ASTM Standard Practice E 1527-13 are noted below or in the corresponding sections of this
report. The scope of this assessment included an evaluation of the following:

 Physical setting characteristics of the property through a review of referenced sources such as
topographic and geologic maps and soils and hydrologic reports.

 Usage of the property, adjoining properties and surrounding area through a review of referenced
historical sources such as land title records, fire insurance maps, city directories, aerial
photographs, prior reports and interviews.

 Observations and interviews regarding current property usage and conditions including: the use,
treatment, storage, disposal or generation of hazardous substances, petroleum products,
hazardous wastes, nonhazardous solid wastes and wastewater.

 Usage of adjoining and surrounding area properties and the likely impact of known or suspected
releases of hazardous substances or petroleum products from those properties on the property.

 Information in referenced environmental agency databases and local environmental records,
within the specified approximate minimum search distance from the property.

The scope of the assessment also included consideration of the following environmental issues or
conditions that are beyond the scope of ASTM Standard Practice E 1527-13:

 Wetlands document review, consisting of a review of a current National Wetlands Inventory map
of the surrounding area to note if the property is identified as having a wetland.

 Flood plain document review, consisting of a review of a reasonably ascertainable flood plain map
of the surrounding area to note if the property is identified as being located within a flood plain.

2.3 Significant Assumption

The assumptions in this report were not considered as having significant impact on the determination of
recognized environmental conditions associated with the property.

2.4 Limitations and Exceptions

ATC has prepared this Phase I ESA report using reasonable efforts to identify recognized environmental
conditions associated with hazardous substances or petroleum products at the property. Findings
contained within this report are based on information collected from observations made on the day(s) of
PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT
Thomas Road Site
14816 Thomas Road
Charlotte, North Carolina 28278

Project No. 199HOP1610 5 ATC Group Services LLC
the site reconnaissance and from reasonably ascertainable information obtained from certain public
agencies and other referenced sources.

The ASTM Standard Practice E 1527-13 recognizes inherent limitations for Phase I ESAs, including, but
not limited to:

 Uncertainty Not Eliminated – A Phase I ESA cannot completely eliminate uncertainty regarding
the potential for recognized environmental conditions in connection with any property.

 Not Exhaustive – A Phase I ESA is not an exhaustive investigation of the property and
environmental conditions on such property.

 Past Uses of the Property – Phase I requirements only require review of standard historical
sources at five year intervals. Therefore, past uses of property at less than five year intervals may
not be discovered.

Users of this report may refer to ASTM Standard Practice E 1527-13 for further information regarding
these and other limitations. This report is not definitive and should not be assumed to be a complete
and/or specific definition of all conditions above or below grade. Current subsurface conditions may differ
from the conditions determined by surface observations, interviews and reviews of historical sources. The
most reliable method of evaluating subsurface conditions is through intrusive techniques, which are
beyond the scope of this report. Information in this report is not intended to be used as a construction
document and should not be used for demolition, renovation, or other property construction purposes. Any
use of this report by any party, beyond the scope and intent of the original parties, shall be at the sole risk
and expense of such user. ATC accepts no liability arising from environmental impact to, or from, the
property, regardless of the date of impact findings or occurrence.

ATC makes no representation or warranty that the past or current operations at the property are, or have
been, in compliance with all applicable federal, state and local laws, regulations and codes. This report
does not warrant against future operations or conditions, nor does it warrant against operations or
conditions present of a type or at a location not investigated. Regardless of the findings stated in this
report, ATC is not responsible for consequences or conditions arising from facts not fully disclosed to ATC
during the assessment.

An independent data research company provided the government agency database referenced in this
report. Information on surrounding area properties was requested for approximate minimum search
distances and is assumed to be correct and complete unless obviously contradicted by ATC’s
observations or other credible referenced sources reviewed during the assessment. ATC shall not be
liable for any such database firm’s failure to make relevant files or documents properly available, to
properly index files, or otherwise to fail to maintain or produce accurate or complete records.

ATC makes no warranty, guarantee or certification regarding the quality, accuracy or reliability of any prior
report provided to ATC and discussed in this Phase I ESA report. ATC expressly disclaims any and all
liability for any errors or omissions contained in any prior reports provided to ATC and discussed in this
Phase I ESA report.

ATC used reasonable efforts to identify evidence of aboveground and underground storage tanks and
ancillary equipment on the property during the assessment. “Reasonable efforts” were limited to
observation of accessible areas, review of referenced public records and interviews. These reasonable
efforts may not identify subsurface equipment or evidence hidden from view by conditions including, but
not limited to, snow cover, paving, construction activities, stored materials and landscaping.

Any estimates of costs or quantities in this report are approximations for commercial real estate
transaction due diligence purposes and are based on the findings, opinions and conclusions of this
PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT
Thomas Road Site
14816 Thomas Road
Charlotte, North Carolina 28278

Project No. 199HOP1610 6 ATC Group Services LLC
assessment, which are limited by the scope of the assessment, schedule demands, cost constraints,
accessibility limitations and other factors associated with performing the Phase I ESA. Subsequent
determinations of costs or quantities may vary from the estimates in this report. The estimated costs or
quantities in this report are not intended to be used for financial disclosure related to the Financial
Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Statement No. 143, FASB Interpretation No. 47, Sarbanes/Oxley Act
or any United States Securities and Exchange Commission reporting obligations, and may not be used for
such purposes in any form without the express written permission of ATC.

ATC is not a professional title insurance or land surveyor firm and makes no guarantee, express or
implied, that any land title records acquired or reviewed in this report, or any physical descriptions or
depictions of the property in this report, represent a comprehensive definition or precise delineation of
property ownership or boundaries.

The Environmental Professional Statement in Section 1.1 of this report does not “certify” the findings
contained in this report and is not a legal opinion of such Environmental Professional. The Environmental
Professional Statement is intended to document ATC’s opinion that an individual meeting the
qualifications of an Environmental Professional was involved in the performance of the assessment and
that the activities performed by, or under the supervision of, the Environmental Professional were
performed in conformance with the standards and practices set forth in 40 CFR Part 312 per the
methodology in ASTM Standard Practice E 1527-13 and the scope of work for this assessment.

Per ASTM Standard Practice E 1527-13, Section 6, User Responsibilities, the User of this assessment
has specific obligations for performing tasks during this assessment that will help identify the possibility of
recognized environmental conditions in connection with the property. Failure by the User to fully comply
with the requirements may impact their ability to use this report to help qualify for Landowner Liability
Protections (LLPs) under Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act
(CERCLA). ATC makes no representations or warranties regarding a User’s qualification for protection
under any federal, state or local laws, rules or regulations.

In accordance with the ASTM Standard Practice E 1527-13, this report is presumed to be valid for a six
month period. If the report is older than six months, the following information must be updated in order for
the report to be valid: (1) regulatory review, (2) site visit, (3) interviews, (4) specialized knowledge and (5)
environmental liens search. Reports older than one year may not meet the ASTM Standard Practice 1527-
13 and therefore, the entire report must be updated to reflect current conditions and property-specific
information.

Other limitations and exceptions that are specific to the scope of this report may be found in
corresponding sections.

PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT
Thomas Road Site
14816 Thomas Road
Charlotte, North Carolina 28278

Project No. 199HOP1610 7 ATC Group Services LLC
2.5 Special Terms and Conditions (User Reliance)

This report is for the use and benefit of, and may be relied upon by, Hopper Communities, and any of its
affiliates, and third parties authorized in writing by Hopper Communities, including the lender(s) in
connection with a secured financing of the property, and their respective successors and assigns. Any
third party agrees by accepting this report that any use or reliance on this report shall be limited by the
exceptions and limitations in this report, and with the acknowledgment that actual site conditions may
change with time, and that hidden conditions may exist at the property that were not discovered within the
authorized scope of the assessment. Any use by or distribution of this report to third parties, without the
express written consent of ATC, is at the sole risk and expense of such third party.

ATC makes no other representation to any third party except that it has used the degree of care and skill
ordinarily exercised by environmental consultants in the preparation of the report and in the assembling of
data and information related thereto. No other warranties are made to any third party, either express or
implied. Unless otherwise agreed upon in writing by ATC and a third party, ATC’s liability to any third party
authorized to use or rely on this report with respect to any acts or omissions shall be limited to a total
maximum amount of $100,000.
PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT
Thomas Road Site
14816 Thomas Road
Charlotte, North Carolina 28278

Project No. 199HOP1610 8 ATC Group Services LLC
3.0 SITE DESCRIPTION

3.1 Location and Legal Description

The property consists of two parcels, totaling 38.3 acres, located on the west side of Thomas Road in
southwest Charlotte, North Carolina. The property address is 14816 Thomas Road in Charlotte,
Mecklenburg County, North Carolina 28278. According to information obtained from the Mecklenburg
County Property Ownership and Land Records System (POLARIS), the property is comprised of two
parcels identified as Parcel Numbers 217-031-02 and 217-031-55. The owners are identified as Doris H.
Giles c/o David Giles and Larry W. Giles / Iris G. Apperson, respectively. The Site Vicinity Map is located
in Appendix A. The Site Plan is located in Appendix B. Site Photographs are provided in Appendix C.

3.2 Surrounding Area General Characteristics

The surrounding area is mostly residential and undeveloped. The vicinity of the subject property is
characterized by residential use to the north, east, and south, and undeveloped land to the west. Local
topography slopes to the southwest towards a tributary of Torrence Branch Creek that runs from northeast
to southwest through the western part of the property.

3.3 Current Use of the Property

The property is currently developed with a single-family residential structure and metal storage shed. A
dilapidated wooden storage shed was also observed in the southeastern part of the property. A majority of
the property is undeveloped wooded land with a creek observed in the western part of the property.

3.4 Description of Property Improvements

The following table provides general descriptions of the property improvements.

PROPERTY IMPROVEMENTS
Size of Property (approximate) 38.3 acres
General Topography of Property Slopes towards the tributary of Torrence Branch Creek that runs
from northeast to southwest through the western part of the
property
Adjoining and/or Access/Egress Roads Thomas Road to the east
Paved or Concrete Areas (including
parking)
Asphalt-paved driveway leading from Thomas Road to the
residential structure
Unimproved Areas Majority of the property, with exception of the on-site residence
Landscaped Areas Surrounding the residential structure
Surface Water Tributary of Torrence Branch Creek running through the western
part of the property
Potable Water Source On-site well
Sanitary Sewer Utility Septic tank
Storm Sewer Utility None
Electrical Utility Duke Energy
Natural Gas Utility None
Current Occupancy Status Residence is occupied
Unoccupied Buildings/Spaces/Structures Dilapidated wooden shed
Number of Occupied Buildings One residential structure and one metal shed
Building Name or General Building
Description
Single-family residential structure
Number of Floors Two
Total Square Feet of Space (approximate) 2,280 square feet
Construction Completion Date (year) 1963
PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT
Thomas Road Site
14816 Thomas Road
Charlotte, North Carolina 28278

Project No. 199HOP1610 9 ATC Group Services LLC
PROPERTY IMPROVEMENTS
Construction Type Crawl space foundation
Interior Finishes Description Carpeting, vinyl flooring, ceramic tile flooring, wood paneled
walls, drywall walls and ceilings, popcorn ceiling texture
Exterior Finishes Description Brick masonry, vinyl siding, wood, roofing shingles
Cooling System Type Electric split system HVAC unit
Heating System Type Electric heat pump
Emergency Power None

3.5 Current Uses of Adjoining Properties

Current uses of the adjoining areas were observed to be as follows:

Direction from
Property
Address Occupant(s) Name Current Use Potential
Environmental
Conditions
North 13701-14029
Appling Lane
Single-family residences Residential None
East 14815 & 14831
Thomas Road
Single-family residences Residential None
South 14900-15300
Thomas Road
Single-family residences Residential None
West Derby Farm Lane,
Arabian Mews
Lane
Single-family residential
neighborhood under
construction
Residential None
Northwest 15821 Youngblood
Road
Single-family residence Residential None

Based on curbside observations, the adjacent sites are not considered recognized environmental
conditions in relation to the property.
PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT
Thomas Road Site
14816 Thomas Road
Charlotte, North Carolina 28278

Project No. 199HOP1610 10 ATC Group Services LLC
4.0 USER PROVIDED INFORMATION

The following section summarizes information (if any) provided by Hopper Communities with regard to the
Phase I ESA. Documentation may be found in Appendix D or where referenced in this report.

4.1 Title Records

The User provided no title records information.

4.2 Environmental Liens or Activity and Use Limitations (AULs)

User provided no information regarding property environmental liens or activity and use limitations. No
evidence of environmental liens or AULs were identified in the regulatory database search. However, a
formal environmental lien search was not performed under the scope of this ESA.

4.3 Specialized Knowledge or Experience of the User

The User provided no specialized knowledge regarding recognized environmental conditions associated
with the property.

4.4 Significant Valuation Reduction for Environmental Issues

The User provided no information regarding a significant valuation reduction for environmental issues
associated with the property.

4.5 Owner, Property Manager and Occupant Information

The User identified the property manager as Mr. Larry Core with SouthEast Commercial Real Estate
Group Inc.

4.6 Reason for Performing Phase I ESA

According to information provided by the User, this Phase I ESA will be used in connection with a
commercial real estate transaction to identify recognized environmental conditions associated with the
property.

4.7 Other User Provided Documents

The User provided a proposed site plan for the property. No other User Provided Documents as described
in the ASTM Standard Practice E 1527-13 were reviewed for this assessment.

PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT
Thomas Road Site
14816 Thomas Road
Charlotte, North Carolina 28278

Project No. 199HOP1610 11 ATC Group Services LLC
5.0 RECORDS REVIEW

5.1 Standard Environmental Records

The regulatory agency database report discussed in this section, provided by Environmental Data
Resources (EDR) of Shelton, Connecticut, was reviewed for information regarding reported releases of
hazardous substances and petroleum products on or near the property. ATC also reviewed the
“unmappable” (also referred to as “orphan”) listings within the database report, cross-referencing available
address information and facility names. Unmappable sites are listings that could not be plotted with
confidence, but are potentially in the general area of the property based on the partial street address, city,
or zip code. Any unmappable site that was identified by ATC as a being within the approximate minimum
search distance from the property based on the site reconnaissance and/or cross-referencing to mapped
listings, is included in the discussion within this section. The complete regulatory agency database report
may be found in Appendix E.

The following is a summary of the findings of the database review.

SUMMARY OF FEDERAL, STATE AND TRIBAL DATABASE FINDINGS
Regulatory Database Approx. Minimum
Search Distance
Property
Listed?
# Sites
Listed
Federal National Priority List (NPL) 1 mile No 0
Federal Delisted NPL ½ mile No 0
Federal Comprehensive Environmental Response,
Compensation, and Liability Information System (CERCLIS)
list
½ mile No 0
Federal CERCLIS No Further Remedial Action Planned
(NFRAP)
½ mile No 0
Federal Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA),
Corrective Action facilities (CORRACTS)
1 mile No 0
Federal RCRIS non- CORRACTS Treatment, Storage, and
Disposal Facilities (TSD)
½ mile No 0
Federal RCRA Generators ½ mile No 0
Federal Institutional Control/Engineering Control Registry ½ mile No 0
Federal Emergency Response Notification System (ERNS)
list
Property No 0
State and Tribal NPL (NC HSDS) 1 mile No 0
State and Tribal CERCLIS (SHWS) 1 mile No 1
State and Tribal Landfill or Solid Waste Disposal Sites ½ mile Yes 1
State and Tribal Leaking Underground Storage Tanks
(LUST)
½ mile No 0
State and Tribal LUST TRUST ½ mile No 0
State and Tribal Leaking Aboveground Storage Tanks
(LAST)
½ mile No 0
State and Tribal Registered Underground Storage Tanks
(UST)
Property &
Adjoining
No 0

Incident Management Database ½ mile No 0
State and Tribal Institutional Control/Engineering Control
Registry
Property No 0
State and Tribal Voluntary Cleanup Site ½ mile No 0
State and Tribal Brownfield Sites ½ mile No 0
State Drycleaners ¼ mile No 0
EDR US Historical Auto Stations ¼ mile No 0
EDR US Historical Cleaners ¼ mile No 0

PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT
Thomas Road Site
14816 Thomas Road
Charlotte, North Carolina 28278

Project No. 199HOP1610 12 ATC Group Services LLC

5.1.1 Federal Agency Database Findings

No sites were identified in the federal agency databases reviewed.

5.1.2 State and Tribal Database Findings

The property, listed in the orphan summary in the database report, was identified in the following state and
tribal databases reviewed.

Thomas Road Demo Landfill
Thomas Road
Charlotte, North Carolina
Databases: NC SWF/LF, NC RGA LF
Approximate Distance from the Property: Target property
Assumed Groundwater Gradient: Same elevation
Regulatory Data Summary: According to the database, the property is an inactive former
demolition landfill. File review information obtained from the Mecklenburg County Environmental
Health Department Groundwater and Wastewater Services revealed that the S.S. Giles Landfill
was located at 14816 Thomas Road, the current address of the on-site residence. This landfill
was operated as a demolition landfill by Blythe Industries from January 8, 1985 to December 23,
1987. According to additional documentation from the file review, the property is on the
Mecklenburg County Priority List (MPL), and as a requirement at MPL sites, the County sampled
four water supply wells in the vicinity of the landfill in February 2003. No contaminants were
detected in the nearby water supply wells. ATC’s geotechnical services department mobilized to
the property on October 31, 2016, and uncovered and removed buried trash, including landscape
debris, and other inert construction debris, including bricks and masonry block. No solid or
hazardous waste was discovered.
Discussion: Based on the nonhazardous nature of the debris uncovered at the property and the
lack of contamination found in area water supply wells, the operation of a former demolition landfill
at the property represents a de minimis condition.

No other sites were identified in the state and tribal databases searched.

5.1.3 Local Environmental Records Sources

Local Health and Environmental Agencies

ATC contacted the Mecklenburg County Land Use and Environmental Services Agency (LUESA) to
inquire about records pertaining to USTs, wells, septic systems, and other environmental-related issues
for the property. According to Mr. Dennis Tyndall, hydrogeologist with Mecklenburg County Environmental
Health Department Groundwater and Wastewater Services, a septic system located at the property
services the on-site house. In addition, the information described above regarding the former on-site
demolition landfill was on file with the department.

Fire Department

ATC contacted the Charlotte Fire Department to inquire about records related to fires and/or spills at the
property. According to Battalion Chief Garry McCormick, no records were on file for the property.

PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT
Thomas Road Site
14816 Thomas Road
Charlotte, North Carolina 28278

Project No. 199HOP1610 13 ATC Group Services LLC
Department of Planning and Zoning

The Mecklenburg County POLARIS website indicated that the property was zoned R-3, single-family
residential 3.0 units per acre, which appears appropriate for the current property use. No zoning violations
were identified.

Municipal Water and Sanitary Sewer Utility

ATC contacted Charlotte Water and confirmed that they do not provide municipal water and sanitary
sewer to the property or surrounding area.

Other Local Environmental Records Sources

No additional local environmental records sources were reviewed.

5.2 Physical Setting Sources

5.2.1 Topography

According to the USGS Topographic 7.5-Minute Series Lake Wylie, South Carolina quadrangle map,
dated 2014, the property is located in an area with an approximate elevation of 734 feet above mean sea
level (MSL). Local topography slopes to the southwest towards a tributary of Torrence Branch Creek that
runs from northeast to southwest through the western part of the property. A copy of the topographic map
is included in Appendix A.

5.2.2 Geology

Based on the Geologic Map of North Carolina (1985), the property lies within the Charlotte Belt of the
Piedmont Physiographic Province. The crystalline metamorphic bedrock beneath the site is likely
metamorphosed granite that is light pinkish gray. The shallow subsurface in most areas of the Piedmont,
including the property, contains residual soil overburden, including structure-free residuum, saprolite, and
partially weathered rock (PWR) that each derive from in-place weathering of the crystalline bedrock.
Occasional areas of recent deposits of alluvium in the uppermost subsurface are found near streams and
rivers. Saprolite and PWR typically contain some relict structures from the original rock material. Depth to
rock ranges from ground surface at occasional outcrops to depths of greater than 100 feet in areas of
easily weathered rock.

5.2.3 Soils

According to information obtained from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Soil
Conservation Service (SCS) Web-Based Soil Survey, the property is primarily underlain by Pacolet sandy
loam and Appling sandy loam. Pacolet soils are well drained and located on hillslopes on ridges. A typical
soil profile consists of sandy loam to 8 inches below ground surface (bgs), clay from 8 to 29 inches bgs,
sandy clay loam from 29 to 38 inches bgs, and sandy loam from 38 to 80 inches bgs. Permeability is
moderately high to high, and the available water capacity is moderate. Appling sandy loam is also well
drained and located on hillslopes on ridges. A typical soil profile consists of sandy loam to 9 inches bgs,
sandy clay loam from 9 to 12 inches bgs, clay from 12 to 48 inches bgs, and sandy clay loam from 48 to
80 inches bgs. Permeability is moderately high to high, and the available water capacity is moderate. A
copy of the online soils map is included in Appendix L.

5.2.4 Hydrology

The shallow aquifer occurrence varies in depth from ground surface at springs, creeks, and rivers to as
deep as 50 feet or more beneath upland surfaces in some parts of the Piedmont. Water in the alluvium or
PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT
Thomas Road Site
14816 Thomas Road
Charlotte, North Carolina 28278

Project No. 199HOP1610 14 ATC Group Services LLC
unconsolidated residual material, including saprolite and PWR, usually behaves as an unconfined, or
water table, aquifer and will yield water with head elevation equivalent to the first elevation where water
was encountered. Permeability varies with lithology and is typically relatively low in residual soils, with
higher permeability in saprolite or PWR due to relict rock texture and variable susceptibility to weathering
exhibited by different minerals in the rock. Groundwater flow in residual soils or alluvium is usually in rough
concurrence with local topographic conditions and is toward local drainage features.

The bedrock fractures or other planar features generally constitute the bedrock aquifer, with the
surrounding rock material being effectively impermeable. Along with fractures, contacts between rock
bodies probably constitute zones of significant groundwater occurrence in the bedrock. Such features may
not occur on predicable trends, at the same elevations, or even be present or directly connected in
separate boreholes. In areas adjacent to creeks the bedrock groundwater generally discharges to the
residuum or alluvium and then into the surface water. In upland areas away from surface water drainages,
the bedrock aquifer is generally recharged by downward infiltration of residuum or alluvial aquifer water at
locations where fractures intersect the bedrock surface.

For sites in the Piedmont, when gradient conditions are discussed, upgradient sites are in locations which
could, based on topographic analysis, have shallow groundwater migration from them toward the project
site. Sidegradient sites are nearby sites with equivalent elevation to the project site, which would be
unlikely to have groundwater migration from them toward the project site, and downgradient sites are
nearby sites which likely receive groundwater migration from beneath the project property. The localized
groundwater flow direction is also anticipated to follow surface drainage flow directions to the north and
northeast. Factors such as underground structures, seasonal fluctuations, soil and bedrock geology,
production wells, and other factors beyond the scope of this study often locally influence actual
groundwater flow direction. The actual groundwater flow under the property can only be accurately
determined by performing a hydrogeologic study, which is beyond the scope of this project.

5.2.5 Other Physical Setting Sources

Flood Plain Map

A review of the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM),
Community Panel Number 3710349800J, dated March 2, 2009, indicated that the property is located
within Zone X, which is an area outside of the 100-year and 500-year floodplain. A copy of the floodplain
map is included in Appendix L.

Wetlands Map

According to the U.S. Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service’s National Wetlands Inventory
(NWI) Map and property observation, no designated wetlands are located on the property. A copy of the
NWI Map is included in Appendix L.

5.3 Historical Records Sources

The following table summarizes the findings of the research presented below pertaining to historical
property and surrounding area uses.

HISTORICAL USE SUMMARY
Period Identified Historical Uses Source(s) Intervals/Comments
Property Surrounding Area
Prior to 1940 Undeveloped Agricultural
Residential
Undeveloped
Aerial Photograph
(1938)
No data gaps
PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT
Thomas Road Site
14816 Thomas Road
Charlotte, North Carolina 28278

Project No. 199HOP1610 15 ATC Group Services LLC
HISTORICAL USE SUMMARY
Period Identified Historical Uses Source(s) Intervals/Comments
Property Surrounding Area
1940-1960 Residential
Undeveloped

Agricultural
Residential
Undeveloped
Aerial Photographs
(1941, 1949, 1951, 1956)
Topographic Maps
(1947, 1949)
Data gap:
1941 to 1947

1961-1980 Residential
Undeveloped
Agricultural
Residential
Undeveloped
Aerial Photographs
(1965, 1968, 1973, 1976)
Topographic Maps
(1968, 1973)
No data gaps
1981 to 2001 Residential
Undeveloped
Landfill from
1985-1987
Agricultural
Residential
Undeveloped
Aerial Photographs
(1983, 1988, 1993, 1994,
1996)
Topographic Map
(1996)
No data gaps

2002-present Residential
Undeveloped
Residential
Undeveloped
Aerial Photographs
(2005, 2006, 2008, 2009,
2011, 2012)
Topographic Map
(2014)
No data gaps

Interval gaps (greater than five years) were encountered during the research of historical use information
for the property and surrounding area. However, based on the review of available historical and regulatory
sources, these data gaps did not have an impact on the recognized environmental condition
determinations of this assessment and are not significant data gaps.

5.3.1 Aerial Photographs

ATC reviewed available aerial photographs of the property and surrounding areas provided by EDR.
Available aerial photographs ranged from 1938 to 2012. The following are descriptions and interpretations
from the aerial photograph review.

AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH SUMMARY
Year Scale Comments
1938
1941

1” = 500’ Property: The property was depicted as mainly undeveloped wooded land with an
undeveloped cleared area in the eastern part along Thomas Road.
Surrounding Area: The surrounding areas to the north, east, south, and west were
depicted as undeveloped wooded land with agricultural fields to the northwest and
northeast.
1949
1951
1956

1” = 500’

Property: The property was depicted as mainly undeveloped wooded land with two
small residential structures in the eastern part along Thomas Road.
Surrounding Area: The surrounding areas to the north, east, south, and west were
depicted as undeveloped wooded land with agricultural fields to the northwest and
northeast and residential properties to the northeast.
1965
1968
1973
1976
1” = 500’
1” = 1,000’

Property: The property was depicted as mainly undeveloped wooded land with two
small residential structures in the eastern part along Thomas Road, and the current
residential building was shown to the southwest of the original structures. One of the
two original structures was no longer present after 1965. Areas just west of the
structures appear to be cleared.
Surrounding Area: The surrounding areas to the north, east, south, and west were
depicted as undeveloped wooded land with residential properties to the northeast,
northwest, and further to the south.
PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT
Thomas Road Site
14816 Thomas Road
Charlotte, North Carolina 28278

Project No. 199HOP1610 16 ATC Group Services LLC
AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH SUMMARY
Year Scale Comments
1983
1988
1993
1994
1996
1” = 500’

Property: The property was depicted as mainly undeveloped wooded land with the
current residential building and a shed in the eastern part. The two original residential
structures were no longer present. Apparent dumping activities were shown to the
west of the residence in the southeastern part of the property.
Surrounding Area: The surrounding areas to the north, east, south, and west were
depicted as undeveloped wooded land with residential properties to the northeast,
northwest, and further to the south.
2005
2006
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
1” = 500’ Property: The property was depicted as mainly undeveloped wooded land with the
current residential building and shed in the eastern part. The areas of former dumping
were overgrown with grass and trees. By 2010, the areas of former dumping were
completely covered with trees.
Surrounding Area: No significant changes to the surrounding area. The surrounding
area appeared as it did during the recent site reconnaissance.

The areas of apparent dumping correspond to the property being utilized as a former demolition landfill;
however, the time of operation could date back to at least 1983. Based on the nonhazardous nature of the
debris uncovered at the property and the lack of contamination found in area water supply wells, the
operation of a former demolition landfill at the property represents a de minimis condition. The review of
aerial photographs did not identify past uses indicating recognized environmental conditions at the
property or surrounding area. Copies of reproducible aerial photographs are included in Appendix F.

5.3.2 Fire Insurance Maps

A search for fire insurance maps for the property and surrounding area was conducted by EDR. No such
maps for the property were available. Documentation is included in Appendix G.

5.3.3 Property Tax Files

ATC reviewed reasonably ascertainable tax files at the Mecklenburg County POLARIS website for
historical ownership information pertaining to the property. Based on this review, Parcel 217-031-02 has
been owned by Doris H. Giles c/o David Giles since January 1, 1975, and the previous owner was not
listed. Parcel 217-031-55 has been owned by Larry W. Giles / Iris G. Apperson since March 18, 1997, and
was previously owned by Doris H. Giles. The dates of previous ownership were not provided. No
additional historical ownership information was present within the files for the property. Review of available
property tax files did not identify recognized environmental conditions for the property.

5.3.4 Recorded Land Title Records

The acquisition of recorded land title records was not required by the scope of work for the Phase I ESA.

5.3.5 Historical USGS Topographic Maps

ATC reviewed available historical USGS topographic maps for information regarding past uses of the
property obtained from EDR. Available historical USGS topographic maps dated 1947, 1949, 1968, 1973,
1996, and 2014 were reviewed. Based on this review, the property was undeveloped on the 1947 and
1949 maps. During this time, small residential structures were shown to the northeast and further to the
north and south. The 1968, 1973, and 1996 maps depicted the current residential building in the eastern
part of the property, with increased residential development to the northeast, north, and south. The 2014
map does not depict development; however, physical features and roads were shown. A tributary of
Torrence Branch Creek was depicted running from northeast to southwest through the western part of the
property. The review of historic USGS topographic maps did not identify past uses indicating recognized
PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT
Thomas Road Site
14816 Thomas Road
Charlotte, North Carolina 28278

Project No. 199HOP1610 17 ATC Group Services LLC
environmental conditions at the property and/or surrounding area. Documentation is included in Appendix
G.

5.3.6 City Directories

Research regarding the availability of historical city directories was obtained from EDR. City directories
were reviewed for the years 1921 through 2013. No listings were identified for the property or surrounding
area. Documentation is included in Appendix G.

5.3.7 Building Department Records

ATC attempted to review available historical building department records at the Mecklenburg County Code
Enforcement website for information regarding past uses of the property. One permit for the replacement
of a damaged electrical meter, dated July 6, 2011, was on file for the property address. The permit status
is listed as complete. No additional historical use information was available for the property.

5.3.8 Zoning/Land Use Records

The Mecklenburg County POLARIS website indicated that the property was zoned R-3, single-family
residential 3.0 units per acre, which appears appropriate for the current property use. No zoning violations
were identified.

5.3.9 Prior Reports

No prior reports were provided for review.

5.3.10 Other Historical Sources

No other historical sources were reviewed.
PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT
Thomas Road Site
14816 Thomas Road
Charlotte, North Carolina 28278

Project No. 199HOP1610 18 ATC Group Services LLC
6.0 SITE RECONNAISSANCE

The following is a summary of visual and/or physical observations of the property on the day of the
property visit. Photographs can be found in Appendix C.

6.1 Methodology and Limiting Conditions

Ms. Natalie Waldner with ATC conducted the property reconnaissance on September 29, 2016, and was
accompanied by Mr. Larry Core with SouthEast Commercial Real Estate Group Inc. and Ms. Kendra (last
name not provided), the current property resident. Kendra rents the house and has lived at the property for
approximately four and a half years. The property reconnaissance consisted of visual and/or physical
observations of: the property and improvements; adjoining sites as viewed from the property; and the
surrounding area based on visual observations made during the trip to and from the property. Unimproved
portions of the property were observed along the perimeter and in a general grid pattern in safely
accessible areas, if accessible and possible. Building exteriors (if any) were observed along the perimeter
from the ground, unless described otherwise. Building interiors (if any) were observed as they were made
safely accessible, unless described otherwise. The two dilapidated on-site sheds did not contain interior
areas. The weather was warm and sunny on the day of the property visit with temperatures in the low 80s
(degrees Fahrenheit).

6.2 Hazardous Substance Use, Storage, and Disposal

ATC did not observe the use, storage or disposal of hazardous substances, including hazardous wastes,
on the property with the exception of small quantities (less than five gallons) of commercial cleaning and
maintenance products that were properly stored in original containers.

6.3 Underground Storage Tanks (USTs)

ATC did not observe evidence of USTs at the property.

6.4 Aboveground Storage Tanks (ASTs)

ATC observed evidence of two apparent fuel ASTs with approximately 300 and 500 gallon capacities in
the wooded area to immediate west of the residence. No staining or stressed vegetation was observed on
the ground beneath the tanks. Based on the lack of apparent releases, the presence of the former fuel
ASTs is considered a de minimis condition.

6.5 Other Petroleum Products

ATC did not observe the use, storage or disposal of other petroleum products at the property. ATC
observed one Duke Energy-owned pole-mounted transformer located in the eastern part of the property
along Thomas Road. Duke Energy would be responsible for maintenance and repair of their equipment
and for releases of mineral oil that might occur. The transformer appeared to be in good condition, with no
observed evidence of leaks, staining, or stressed vegetation observed in the area below the transformer.

6.6 Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs)

ATC did not observe evidence of the use, storage or disposal of PCB-containing transformers, hydraulic
lifts, or other equipment at the property.

6.7 Unidentified Substance Containers

ATC observed the presence of unidentified substance containers on the property in the form of apparent
pesticide or herbicide containers and other small containers of unknown contents near a dilapidated shed
PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT
Thomas Road Site
14816 Thomas Road
Charlotte, North Carolina 28278

Project No. 199HOP1610 19 ATC Group Services LLC
in the wooded area to the immediate west of the residence. No staining or stressed vegetation was
observed on the ground beneath the tanks. Based on the lack of apparent releases, the presence of the
former fuel ASTs is considered a de minimis condition.

6.8 Nonhazardous Solid Waste

ATC observed evidence of the generation, storage or disposal of nonhazardous solid waste at the
property as noted below.

NONHAZARDOUS SOLID WASTE SUMMARY TABLE
Type of Waste Generation
Process
Quantity Type of
Storage
Location Disposal/Removal
Method &
Frequency
Evidence
of
Release?
Municipal solid waste

General
household
operations
One Rolling
dumpster
Next to
residence
Weekly No
Construction &
demolition debris

Former site
operations
Numerous On ground Wooded
area to the
west of the
residence
None No
Scrap tires Former site
operations
Numerous On ground Wooded
area to the
west of the
residence
None No

The presence of the listed nonhazardous solid waste does not a recognized environmental condition
based on observed conditions. However, the construction and demolition debris and scrap tires are
considered a de minimis condition.

6.9 Wastewater

ATC observed evidence of wastewater generated, treated or discharged (including sanitary sewage and
stormwater) in, on or at the property or to adjoining properties as summarized below.

WASTEWATER SUMMARY TABLE
Type of Wastewater Generation Process Treatment System? Discharged To?
Domestic Sanitary Sewage

General household
operations
No

Septic System

Stormwater

Rain events No Ground and on-site stream

The identified wastewater sources do not represent a recognized environmental condition based on
observed conditions).

6.10 Waste Pits, Ponds and Lagoons

ATC did not observe evidence of waste pits, ponds, or lagoons at the property.

6.11 Drains and Sumps

ATC did not observe evidence of sumps or drains at the property.

PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT
Thomas Road Site
14816 Thomas Road
Charlotte, North Carolina 28278

Project No. 199HOP1610 20 ATC Group Services LLC
6.12 Septic Systems

ATC observed evidence of a septic system that serves the on-site residence. A permit for the septic
system is on file with the Mecklenburg County Environmental Health Department Groundwater and
Wastewater Services. The permit is dated January 5, 1999, and no violations are on file with the County.
Kendra pointed out the area of the septic tank, and no unusually strong odors, signs of corrosion, or
stressed vegetation was observed in the area. The septic system identified on the property does not
represent a recognized environmental condition based on observed conditions.

6.13 Storm water Management System

Stormwater at the property either infiltrates the ground or flows over land, and travels towards storm water
ditches along the highway or towards the on-site creek. The property is grass land and wooded land with
no covered areas. The observed vegetation did not exhibit signs of biological stress.

6.14 Wells

ATC observed evidence of a water supply well on the property that serves the on-site residence. No
unusually strong odors, signs of corrosion, or stressed vegetation was observed in the area surrounding
the well. The water supply well identified on the property does not represent a recognized environmental
condition based on observed conditions.
PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT
Thomas Road Site
14816 Thomas Road
Charlotte, North Carolina 28278

Project No. 199HOP1610 21 ATC Group Services LLC

7.0 SUBSURFACE VAPOR MIGRATION

Hazardous gases (vapor) from subsurface sources, such as contaminated soil or groundwater can
migrate into residential, commercial, and industrial buildings with any foundation type, including
basements, crawlspaces, or slabs. According to EPA guidance, three conditions must exist for hazardous
vapors to reach the interior of buildings from the subsurface environment underneath or near a building.
First, a source of hazardous vapors must be present in the soil or in groundwater underneath or near a
building. Second, vapors must form and have a pathway along which to migrate toward the building. Third,
entry routes must exist for the vapors to enter the building, and driving forces must exist to draw the
vapors into the building.

ATC considered the nature and extent of on-site and nearby sources of potential subsurface vapor
migration by evaluating the current and historical usage of the property, the construction type and history,
the physical setting, and the potential sources of subsurface vapor migration through the review of
regulatory agency database information that was summarized in Section 5.0. Based on the evaluation of
the known or suspected releases of hazardous substances or petroleum products, distance from the
property, potential pathways, and soil type, et al, no potential subsurface vapor migration sources were
determined to represent a recognized environmental condition.

PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT
Thomas Road Site
14816 Thomas Road
Charlotte, North Carolina 28278

Project No. 199HOP1610 22 ATC Group Services LLC
8.0 INTERVIEWS

The following persons were interviewed to obtain information regarding recognized environmental
conditions in connection with the property:

INTERVIEW SUMMARY
Role Name Title/Company Years
Assoc.
With
Property
Interview
Type
Site Manager
Mr. Larry Core Property Manager / SouthEast
Commercial Real Estate Group Inc.
<1

In person

Site Resident Ms. Kendra (last name not
provided) Property resident 4.5 In person
Local Govt.
Official Mr. Dennis Tyndall Mecklenburg County Land Use and
Environmental Services Agency
N/A Telephone

Local Govt.
Official Battalion Chief Garry
McCormick
Battalion Chief / Charlotte Fire
Department
N/A Telephone
message

Local Utility
Official Representative Charlotte Water N/A Telephone

Pertinent information from the interviews is discussed in applicable sections of this report with details
(including failed attempts to interview) documented on Record of Communication forms in Appendix J.

PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT
Thomas Road Site
14816 Thomas Road
Charlotte, North Carolina 28278

Project No. 199HOP1610 23 ATC Group Services LLC
9.0 OTHER ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS

9.1 Asbestos-Containing Materials (ACM)

Based on the scope of work for this ESA, sampling and analyses for ACM was not conducted. All suspect
ACM should be properly assessed prior to disturbance from construction or maintenance activities.
Suspect ACM was observed in the form of vinyl flooring, popcorn ceiling texture, and roofing materials.
Observed building materials and finishes were noted to be in good condition at the time of the site visit.

9.2 Radon

Radon is a naturally occurring colorless, odorless gas that is a by-product of the decay of radioactive
materials potentially present in bedrock and soil. The EPA guidance action level for annual residential
exposure to radon is 4.0 picoCuries per liter of air (pCi/L). The guidance action level is not a regulatory
requirement for private owners of commercial real estate, but is commonly used for comparison purposes
to suggest whether further action at a building may be prudent.

ATC’s review of published radon data indicates that the property is located in U.S. EPA Radon Zone 3, an
area of low propensity with regard to the potential for elevated levels of radon gas. Of the 46 samples
recorded for Mecklenburg County, the radon for first floor living areas was reported as 0.569 pCi/L, and
basement areas were reported as 1.278 pCi/L. Based on the published data, no additional investigations
are recommended at this time.

9.3 Lead in Drinking Water

ATC contacted Charlotte Water and confirmed that they do not provide municipal water and sanitary
sewer to the property or surrounding area. Testing results for the on-site well were not identified.

9.4 Lead-Based Paint (LBP)

Based on the scope of work for this ESA, ATC did not conduct a screening survey for LBP on painted
surfaces at the property. Based on the 1963 construction date of the property improvements, lead-based
paint may be present in the on-site residence. Observed painted surfaces were in good condition at the
time of the site visit.

9.5 Mold Screening

ATC did not observe any evidence of moisture intrusion during the reconnaissance, nor was any instance
of historical moisture intrusion disclosed. Mold growth was not observed within the building. Based on the
results of the interview and physical observation, ATC found no evidence indicating mold impact at the
property at the time of the site reconnaissance.

9.6 Additional User Requested Conditions

No additional User requested services were included in the scope of work for this ESA.
PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT
Thomas Road Site
14816 Thomas Road
Charlotte, North Carolina 28278

Project No. 199HOP1610 24 ATC Group Services LLC
10.0 REFERENCES

ASTM International, Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase I Environmental Site
Assessment Process, ASTM Designation E 1527-13.

Environmental Data Resources, Inc., EDR Aerial Photo Decade Package; Inquiry Number 4721182.9,
September 8, 2016.

Environmental Data Resources, Inc., EDR City Directory Abstract; Inquiry Number 4721182.5, September
8, 2016.

Environmental Data Resources, Inc., EDR Historical Topographic Map Report; Inquiry Number
4721182.4, September 8, 2016.

Environmental Data Resources, Inc., EDR Radius Report with GeoCheck®; Inquiry Number 4721182.2s,
September 8, 2016.

Environmental Data Resources, Inc., EDR Sanborn® Map Report; Inquiry Number 4721182.3, September
8, 2016.

Federal Emergency Management Agency, Flood Insurance Rate Map, Community Panel Number
3710349800J, dated March 2, 2009.

North Carolina Geological Survey, Geologic Map of North Carolina, 1985.

United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) database,
(http://www.fws.gov/wetlands/Wetlands-Mapper.html).

United States Department of Agriculture-Soil Conservation Service Web-Based Soil Survey.
PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT
Thomas Road Site
14816 Thomas Road
Charlotte, North Carolina 28278

Project No. 199HOP1610 25 ATC Group Services LLC
11.0 APPENDICES

Appendix A - Site Vicinity Map
Appendix B - Site Plan
Appendix C - Site Photographs
Appendix D - User Provided Documentation
Appendix E - Regulatory Database Report
Appendix F - Aerial Photographs
Appendix G - Historical Research Documentation
Appendix H - Prior Reports
Appendix I - Resumes
Appendix J - Records of Communication
Appendix K - Laboratory Reports
Appendix L - Other Supporting Documentation
Appendix M - Terminology
PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT
Thomas Road Site
14816 Thomas Road
Charlotte, North Carolina 28278

Project No. 199HOP1610 ATC Group Services LLC
APPENDIX A

SITE VICINITY MAP
PREPARED FOR:
PROJ. MGR:DATE:
DRAWN BY:PROJ. #:
Image Provided By EDR USGS Topographic Maps
Boundaries are approximate
TOPO MAP - 2014
12/1/2016DH
Hopper Communities
Charlotte, North Carolina 28278
14816 Thomas Road
THOMAS ROAD SITE
NW 199HOP1610
PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT
Thomas Road Site
14816 Thomas Road
Charlotte, North Carolina 28278

Project No. 199HOP1610 ATC Group Services LLC
APPENDIX B

SITE PLAN
7606 Whitehall Executive Center Drive, Suite 800
Charlotte, North Carolina 28273
[phone]
SITE PLAN
Thomas Road Site
14816 Thomas Road
Charlotte, North CarolinaSOURCE: Mecklenburg County POLARIS
Approximate Scale: 1 inch = 370 feet
Residential
Residential
Residential
Residential
Residential
Utility
Right-of-
Way
On-site
Residence
Area of former
landfill
Water
supply well
Area of
septic tank
PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT
Thomas Road Site
14816 Thomas Road
Charlotte, North Carolina 28278

Project No. 199HOP1610 ATC Group Services LLC
APPENDIX C

SITE PHOTOGRAPHS
PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT
Thomas Road Site
14816 Thomas Road
Charlotte, North Carolina

Project No. 199HOP1610 1 ATC

Photo 1: Eastern side of the on-site residence Photo 2: Northern side of the residence

Photo 3: Split system HVAC unit Photo 4: Water supply well

Photo 5: Area of septic tank Photo 6: Shed located at the property

PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT
Thomas Road Site
14816 Thomas Road
Charlotte, North Carolina

Project No. 199HOP1610 2 ATC

Photo 7: Typical bedroom inside the residence Photo 8: Kitchen area

Photo 9: Dilapidated shed to the west of the residence Photo 10: View inside shed

Photo 11: Discarded unidentified substance containers Photo 12: Additional containers

PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT
Thomas Road Site
14816 Thomas Road
Charlotte, North Carolina

Project No. 199HOP1610 3 ATC

Photo 13: Apparent former heating oil ASTs Photo 14: Old farm equipment

Photo 15: Construction debris Photo 16: Abandoned vehicle

Photo 17: Stream running through the western part of the
property Photo 18: Wooded land in the western part of the property

PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT
Thomas Road Site
14816 Thomas Road
Charlotte, North Carolina

Project No. 199HOP1610 4 ATC

Photo 19: Single-family residential neighborhood to the north Photo 20: Single-family residences to the east

Photo 21: Single-family residence to the south Photo 22: Single-family residence to the northwest

PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT
Thomas Road Site
14816 Thomas Road
Charlotte, North Carolina 28278

Project No. 199HOP1610 ATC Group Services LLC
APPENDIX D

USER PROVIDED DOCUMENTATION

PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT
Thomas Road Site
14816 Thomas Road
Charlotte, North Carolina 28278

Project No. 199HOP1610 ATC Group Services LLC
APPENDIX E

REGULATORY DATABASE REPORT
FORM-LBC-DXG
®kcehCoeG htiw tropeR ™paM suidaR RDE ehT
6 Armstrong Road, 4th floor
Shelton, CT 06484
Toll Free: 800.352.0050
www.edrnet.com
Thomas Road Site
14816 Thomas Road
Charlotte, NC 28278
Inquiry Number: 4721182.2s
September 08, 2016
SECTION PAGE
Executive Summary ES1
Overview Map 2
Detail Map 3
Map Findings Summary 4
Map Findings 8
Orphan Summary 9
Government Records Searched/Data Currency Tracking GR-1
GEOCHECK ADDENDUM
Physical Setting Source Addendum A-1
Physical Setting Source Summary A-2
Physical Setting SSURGO Soil Map A-5
Physical Setting Source Map A-13
Physical Setting Source Map Findings A-15
Physical Setting Source Records Searched PSGR-1
TC4721182.2s Page 1
Thank you for your business.
Please contact EDR at 1-800-352-0050
with any questions or comments.
Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice
This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data
Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from
other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL
DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION,
MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL
ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE,
ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL,
CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY
LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS". Any analyses, estimates, ratings,
environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor
should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I
Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any
property. Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice.
Copyright 2016 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole
or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission.
EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other
trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TC4721182.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1
A search of available environmental records was conducted by Environmental Data Resources, Inc (EDR).
The report was designed to assist parties seeking to meet the search requirements of EPA’s Standards
and Practices for All Appropriate Inquiries (40 CFR Part 312), the ASTM Standard Practice for
Environmental Site Assessments (E 1527-13) or custom requirements developed for the evaluation of
environmental risk associated with a parcel of real estate.
TARGET PROPERTY INFORMATION
ADDRESS
14816 THOMAS ROAD
CHARLOTTE, NC 28278
COORDINATES
35.0711600 - 35˚ 4’ 16.17’’Latitude (North):
81.0094380 - 81˚ 0’ 33.97’’Longitude (West):
Zone 17Universal Tranverse Mercator:
499139.5UTM X (Meters):
3880736.8UTM Y (Meters):
734 ft. above sea levelElevation:
USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP ASSOCIATED WITH TARGET PROPERTY
6061844 LAKE WYLIE, SCTarget Property Map:
2014Version Date:
6060301 FORT MILL, SCEast Map:
2014Version Date:
AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY IN THIS REPORT
20150523Portions of Photo from:
USDASource:
4721182.2s Page 2
1 3050 OLD FARM RD 3050 OLD FARM RD SC SHWS Lower 3826, 0.725, SE
MAPPED SITES SUMMARY
Target Property Address:
14816 THOMAS ROAD
CHARLOTTE, NC 28278
Click on Map ID to see full detail.
MAP RELATIVE DIST (ft. & mi.)
ID DATABASE ACRONYMS ELEVATION DIRECTIONSITE NAME ADDRESS
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TC4721182.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3
TARGET PROPERTY SEARCH RESULTS
The target property was not listed in any of the databases searched by EDR.
DATABASES WITH NO MAPPED SITES
No mapped sites were found in EDR’s search of available ("reasonably ascertainable ") government
records either on the target property or within the search radius around the target property for the
following databases:
STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Federal NPL site list
NPL National Priority List
Proposed NPL Proposed National Priority List Sites
NPL LIENS Federal Superfund Liens
Federal Delisted NPL site list
Delisted NPL National Priority List Deletions
Federal CERCLIS list
FEDERAL FACILITY Federal Facility Site Information listing
SEMS Superfund Enterprise Management System
Federal CERCLIS NFRAP site list
SEMS-ARCHIVE Superfund Enterprise Management System Archive
Federal RCRA CORRACTS facilities list
CORRACTS Corrective Action Report
Federal RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD facilities list
RCRA-TSDF RCRA - Treatment, Storage and Disposal
Federal RCRA generators list
RCRA-LQG RCRA - Large Quantity Generators
RCRA-SQG RCRA - Small Quantity Generators
RCRA-CESQG RCRA - Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generator
Federal institutional controls / engineering controls registries
LUCIS Land Use Control Information System
US ENG CONTROLS Engineering Controls Sites List
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TC4721182.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4
US INST CONTROL Sites with Institutional Controls
Federal ERNS list
ERNS Emergency Response Notification System
State- and tribal - equivalent NPL
NC HSDS Hazardous Substance Disposal Site
State- and tribal - equivalent CERCLIS
NC SHWS Inactive Hazardous Sites Inventory
State and tribal landfill and/or solid waste disposal site lists
NC SWF/LF List of Solid Waste Facilities
SC SWF/LF Permitted Landfills List
NC OLI Old Landfill Inventory
State and tribal leaking storage tank lists
NC LUST Regional UST Database
NC LAST Leaking Aboveground Storage Tanks
SC LUST Leaking Underground Storage Tank List
INDIAN LUST Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
NC LUST TRUST State Trust Fund Database
State and tribal registered storage tank lists
FEMA UST Underground Storage Tank Listing
NC UST Petroleum Underground Storage Tank Database
SC UST Comprehensive Underground Storage Tanks
NC AST AST Database
SC AST Aboveground Storage Tank List
INDIAN UST Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
State and tribal institutional control / engineering control registries
NC INST CONTROL No Further Action Sites With Land Use Restrictions Monitoring
State and tribal voluntary cleanup sites
NC VCP Responsible Party Voluntary Action Sites
INDIAN VCP Voluntary Cleanup Priority Listing
SC VCP Voluntary Cleanup Sites
State and tribal Brownfields sites
NC BROWNFIELDS Brownfields Projects Inventory
SC BROWNFIELDS Brownfields Sites Listing
ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Local Brownfield lists
US BROWNFIELDS A Listing of Brownfields Sites
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TC4721182.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 5
Local Lists of Landfill / Solid Waste Disposal Sites
NC HIST LF Solid Waste Facility Listing
NC SWRCY Recycling Center Listing
SC SWRCY Solid Waste Recycling Facilities
INDIAN ODI Report on the Status of Open Dumps on Indian Lands
ODI Open Dump Inventory
DEBRIS REGION 9 Torres Martinez Reservation Illegal Dump Site Locations
Local Lists of Hazardous waste / Contaminated Sites
US HIST CDL Delisted National Clandestine Laboratory Register
US CDL National Clandestine Laboratory Register
Local Land Records
LIENS 2 CERCLA Lien Information
Records of Emergency Release Reports
HMIRS Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System
NC SPILLS Spills Incident Listing
SC SPILLS Spills Database List
NC IMD Incident Management Database
NC SPILLS 90 SPILLS 90 data from FirstSearch
SC SPILLS 90 SPILLS 90 data from FirstSearch
NC SPILLS 80 SPILLS 80 data from FirstSearch
SC SPILLS 80 SPILLS 80 data from FirstSearch
Other Ascertainable Records
RCRA NonGen / NLR RCRA - Non Generators / No Longer Regulated
FUDS Formerly Used Defense Sites
DOD Department of Defense Sites
SCRD DRYCLEANERS State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners Listing
US FIN ASSUR Financial Assurance Information
EPA WATCH LIST EPA WATCH LIST
2020 COR ACTION 2020 Corrective Action Program List
TSCA Toxic Substances Control Act
TRIS Toxic Chemical Release Inventory System
SSTS Section 7 Tracking Systems
ROD Records Of Decision
RMP Risk Management Plans
RAATS RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System
PRP Potentially Responsible Parties
PADS PCB Activity Database System
ICIS Integrated Compliance Information System
FTTS FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide
Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act)
MLTS Material Licensing Tracking System
COAL ASH DOE Steam-Electric Plant Operation Data
COAL ASH EPA Coal Combustion Residues Surface Impoundments List
PCB TRANSFORMER PCB Transformer Registration Database
RADINFO Radiation Information Database
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TC4721182.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 6
HIST FTTS FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Administrative Case Listing
DOT OPS Incident and Accident Data
CONSENT Superfund (CERCLA) Consent Decrees
INDIAN RESERV Indian Reservations
FUSRAP Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program
UMTRA Uranium Mill Tailings Sites
LEAD SMELTERS Lead Smelter Sites
US AIRS Aerometric Information Retrieval System Facility Subsystem
US MINES Mines Master Index File
FINDS Facility Index System/Facility Registry System
UXO Unexploded Ordnance Sites
DOCKET HWC Hazardous Waste Compliance Docket Listing
NC COAL ASH Coal Ash Disposal Sites
SC COAL ASH Coal Ash Disposal Sites
NC DRYCLEANERS Drycleaning Sites
SC DRYCLEANERS Drycleaner Database
NC Financial Assurance Financial Assurance Information Listing
SC Financial Assurance Financial Assurance Information Listing
SC GWCI Groundwater Contamination Inventory
NC NPDES NPDES Facility Location Listing
SC NPDES Waste Water Treatment Facilities Listing
NC UIC Underground Injection Wells Listing
SC UIC Underground Injection Wells Listing
ECHO Enforcement & Compliance History Information
FUELS PROGRAM EPA Fuels Program Registered Listing
EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS
EDR Exclusive Records
EDR MGP EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plants
EDR Hist Auto EDR Exclusive Historic Gas Stations
EDR Hist Cleaner EDR Exclusive Historic Dry Cleaners
EDR RECOVERED GOVERNMENT ARCHIVES
Exclusive Recovered Govt. Archives
NC RGA HWS Recovered Government Archive State Hazardous Waste Facilities List
SC RGA HWS Recovered Government Archive State Hazardous Waste Facilities List
NC RGA LF Recovered Government Archive Solid Waste Facilities List
SC RGA LF Recovered Government Archive Solid Waste Facilities List
NC RGA LUST Recovered Government Archive Leaking Underground Storage Tank
SC RGA LUST Recovered Government Archive Leaking Underground Storage Tank
SURROUNDING SITES: SEARCH RESULTS
Surrounding sites were identified in the following databases.
Elevations have been determined from the USGS Digital Elevation Model and should be evaluated on
a relative (not an absolute) basis. Relative elevation information between sites of close proximity
should be field verified. Sites with an elevation equal to or higher than the target property have been
differentiated below from sites with an elevation lower than the target property.
Page numbers and map identification numbers refer to the EDR Radius Map report where detailed
data on individual sites can be reviewed.
Sites listed in bold italics are in multiple databases.
Unmappable (orphan) sites are not considered in the foregoing analysis.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TC4721182.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 7
STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
State- and tribal - equivalent CERCLIS
SC SHWS: State hazardous waste site records are the states’ equivalent to CERCLIS. These sites may
or may not already be listed on the federal CERCLIS list. Priority sites planned for cleanup using state
funds (state equivalent of Superfund) are identified along with sites where cleanup will be paid for by
potentially responsible parties. Available information varies by state.
A review of the SC SHWS list, as provided by EDR, and dated 06/28/2016 has revealed that there is 1
SC SHWS site within approximately 1 mile of the target property.
PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____
3050 OLD FARM RD 3050 OLD FARM RD SE 1/2 - 1 (0.725 mi.) 1 8
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TC4721182.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 8
Due to poor or inadequate address information, the following sites were not mapped. Count: 2 records.
Site Name Database(s)____________ ____________
THOMAS ROAD DEMO LANDFILL NC SWF/LF
THOMAS ROAD DEMO LANDFILL NC RGA LF
EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.76 8
640
6 40
6806 40 7207207 2 0 7607607 20
7606806 0 0 640 72076076
0760640640680
640
760720640 720
6 00
720 6807 60
760680720 720720
7207 60
6807 2 0
7207607 60
7 60720
7 20 7 2 07 60
7 607207
6076 0
80076072076076068 0760
7 60
760
68 0720680
7
2
0
680720 720720
7 20
7
2
0720
720720720
72072 07207 2 0
7 2 0
7 20
720
640
72 0
680 6 80720
68 0680640 680
7206 40
720640 6 4 0 680
68072
0
680
680
680640 7 20720
680 6 80
680680
600
7 2 0
6807 2 0640680720
72720 646 80
680680680680
6806806806 8068068 0
6
80680
6 8 0
6 80680680
6 8 0
680
6 806680
68 0
640
64 0
6 40
640
0
0
640 6406 40
640
60 0
600
720
720720720
7 2 0
7 20
7 20
7
2072
0 720720 7
7 20
720
720
720720
7 20
6
6 8 0
680680
7207207207 2 0
6 80720 7207 2 0
7 2 0 720720
7207 20
6 80
720
720
7 2 0 7207 2 0720720720
720
7 20680
720680 68 0
6 8
EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.
7 6068
0 760
7 2 0
7207607 60
76 0
7 6 0
7
60760720760800760760760680
76
0
760
760
680680680
7
207 20
720680 720720
720
720
72 0
7 2 0
720680
680
680
MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY
Search
TargetDistance Total
Database Property(Miles) < 1/8 1/8 - 1/4 1/4 - 1/2 1/2 - 1 > 1 Plotted
STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Federal NPL site list
0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000NPL
0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000Proposed NPL
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPNPL LIENS
Federal Delisted NPL site list
0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000Delisted NPL
Federal CERCLIS list
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500FEDERAL FACILITY
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500SEMS
Federal CERCLIS NFRAP site list
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500SEMS-ARCHIVE
Federal RCRA CORRACTS facilities list
0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000CORRACTS
Federal RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD facilities list
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500RCRA-TSDF
Federal RCRA generators list
0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250RCRA-LQG
0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250RCRA-SQG
0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250RCRA-CESQG
Federal institutional controls /
engineering controls registries
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500LUCIS
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500US ENG CONTROLS
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500US INST CONTROL
Federal ERNS list
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPERNS
State- and tribal - equivalent NPL
0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000NC HSDS
State- and tribal - equivalent CERCLIS
0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000NC SHWS
1 NR 1 0 0 0 1.000SC SHWS
State and tribal landfill and/or
solid waste disposal site lists
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500NC SWF/LF
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500SC SWF/LF
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500NC OLI
TC4721182.2s Page 4
MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY
Search
TargetDistance Total
Database Property(Miles) < 1/8 1/8 - 1/4 1/4 - 1/2 1/2 - 1 > 1 Plotted
State and tribal leaking storage tank lists
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500NC LUST
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500NC LAST
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500SC LUST
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500INDIAN LUST
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500NC LUST TRUST
State and tribal registered storage tank lists
0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250FEMA UST
0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250NC UST
0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250SC UST
0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250NC AST
0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250SC AST
0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250INDIAN UST
State and tribal institutional
control / engineering control registries
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500NC INST CONTROL
State and tribal voluntary cleanup sites
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500NC VCP
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500INDIAN VCP
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500SC VCP
State and tribal Brownfields sites
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500NC BROWNFIELDS
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500SC BROWNFIELDS
ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Local Brownfield lists
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500US BROWNFIELDS
Local Lists of Landfill / Solid
Waste Disposal Sites
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500NC HIST LF
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500NC SWRCY
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500SC SWRCY
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500INDIAN ODI
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500ODI
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500DEBRIS REGION 9
Local Lists of Hazardous waste /
Contaminated Sites
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPUS HIST CDL
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPUS CDL
Local Land Records
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPLIENS 2
TC4721182.2s Page 5
MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY
Search
TargetDistance Total
Database Property(Miles) < 1/8 1/8 - 1/4 1/4 - 1/2 1/2 - 1 > 1 Plotted
Records of Emergency Release Reports
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPHMIRS
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPNC SPILLS
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPSC SPILLS
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500NC IMD
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPNC SPILLS 90
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPSC SPILLS 90
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPNC SPILLS 80
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPSC SPILLS 80
Other Ascertainable Records
0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250RCRA NonGen / NLR
0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000FUDS
0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000DOD
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500SCRD DRYCLEANERS
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPUS FIN ASSUR
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPEPA WATCH LIST
0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.2502020 COR ACTION
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPTSCA
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPTRIS
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPSSTS
0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000ROD
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPRMP
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPRAATS
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPPRP
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPPADS
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPICIS
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPFTTS
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPMLTS
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPCOAL ASH DOE
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500COAL ASH EPA
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPPCB TRANSFORMER
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPRADINFO
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPHIST FTTS
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPDOT OPS
0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000CONSENT
0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000INDIAN RESERV
0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000FUSRAP
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500UMTRA
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPLEAD SMELTERS
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPUS AIRS
0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250US MINES
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPFINDS
0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000UXO
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPDOCKET HWC
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500NC COAL ASH
0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500SC COAL ASH
0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250NC DRYCLEANERS
0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250SC DRYCLEANERS
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPNC Financial Assurance
TC4721182.2s Page 6
MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY
Search
TargetDistance Total
Database Property(Miles) < 1/8 1/8 - 1/4 1/4 - 1/2 1/2 - 1 > 1 Plotted
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPSC Financial Assurance
0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000SC GWCI
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPNC NPDES
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPSC NPDES
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPNC UIC
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPSC UIC
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPECHO
0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250FUELS PROGRAM
EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS
EDR Exclusive Records
0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000EDR MGP
0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.125EDR Hist Auto
0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.125EDR Hist Cleaner
EDR RECOVERED GOVERNMENT ARCHIVES
Exclusive Recovered Govt. Archives
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPNC RGA HWS
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPSC RGA HWS
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPNC RGA LF
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPSC RGA LF
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPNC RGA LUST
0 NR NR NR NR NR TPSC RGA LUST
1 0 1 0 0 0 0- Totals --
NOTES:
TP = Target Property
NR = Not Requested at this Search Distance
Sites may be listed in more than one database
TC4721182.2s Page 7
MAP FINDINGSMap ID
Direction
EDR ID NumberDistance
EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation
Not reportedEPA ID:
SHWS:
3826 ft.
0.725 mi.
Relative:
Lower
Actual:
708 ft.
1/2-1 FORT MILL, SC 29708
SE 3050 OLD FARM RD N/A
1 SC SHWS3050 OLD FARM RD S118693150
TC4721182.2s Page 8
ORPHAN SUMMARYCityEDR IDSite NameSite AddressZipDatabase(s)Count: 2 records.CHARLOTTE S109164089THOMAS ROAD DEMO LANDFILLTHOMAS ROAD NC SWF/LFCHARLOTTE S115654795THOMAS ROAD DEMO LANDFILLTHOMAS ROAD NC RGA LFTC4721182.2s Page 9
To maintain currency of the following federal and state databases, EDR contacts the appropriate governmental agency
on a monthly or quarterly basis, as required.
Number of Days to Update:Provides confirmation that EDR is reporting records that have been updated within 90 days
from the date the government agency made the information available to the public.
STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Federal NPL site list
NPL: National Priority List
National Priorities List (Superfund). The NPL is a subset of CERCLIS and identifies over 1,200 sites for priority
cleanup under the Superfund Program. NPL sites may encompass relatively large areas. As such, EDR provides polygon
coverage for over 1,000 NPL site boundaries produced by EPA’s Environmental Photographic Interpretation Center
(EPIC) and regional EPA offices.
Date of Government Version: 03/07/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/05/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/15/2016
Number of Days to Update: 10
Source: EPA
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 07/07/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/17/2016
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
NPL Site Boundaries
Sources:
EPA’s Environmental Photographic Interpretation Center (EPIC)
Telephone: [phone]
EPA Region 1 EPA Region 6
Telephone [phone] Telephone: [phone]
EPA Region 3 EPA Region 7
Telephone [phone] Telephone: [phone]
EPA Region 4 EPA Region 8
Telephone [phone] Telephone: [phone]
EPA Region 5 EPA Region 9
Telephone [phone] Telephone: [phone]
EPA Region 10
Telephone [phone]
Proposed NPL: Proposed National Priority List Sites
A site that has been proposed for listing on the National Priorities List through the issuance of a proposed rule
in the Federal Register. EPA then accepts public comments on the site, responds to the comments, and places on
the NPL those sites that continue to meet the requirements for listing.
Date of Government Version: 03/07/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/05/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/15/2016
Number of Days to Update: 10
Source: EPA
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 07/07/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/17/2016
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
NPL LIENS: Federal Superfund Liens
Federal Superfund Liens. Under the authority granted the USEPA by CERCLA of 1980, the USEPA has the authority
to file liens against real property in order to recover remedial action expenditures or when the property owner
received notification of potential liability. USEPA compiles a listing of filed notices of Superfund Liens.
Date of Government Version: 10/15/1991
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/02/1994
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/30/1994
Number of Days to Update: 56
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 08/15/2011
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/28/2011
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
TC4721182.2s Page GR-1
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Federal Delisted NPL site list
Delisted NPL: National Priority List Deletions
The National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan (NCP) establishes the criteria that the
EPA uses to delete sites from the NPL. In accordance with 40 CFR 300.425.(e), sites may be deleted from the
NPL where no further response is appropriate.
Date of Government Version: 03/07/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/05/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/15/2016
Number of Days to Update: 10
Source: EPA
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 07/07/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/17/2016
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
Federal CERCLIS list
FEDERAL FACILITY: Federal Facility Site Information listing
A listing of National Priority List (NPL) and Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) sites found in the Comprehensive
Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Information System (CERCLIS) Database where EPA Federal Facilities
Restoration and Reuse Office is involved in cleanup activities.
Date of Government Version: 11/13/2015
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/06/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/20/2016
Number of Days to Update: 135
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/06/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/17/2016
Data Release Frequency: Varies
SEMS: Superfund Enterprise Management System
SEMS (Superfund Enterprise Management System) tracks hazardous waste sites, potentially hazardous waste sites,
and remedial activities performed in support of EPA’s Superfund Program across the United States. The list was
formerly know as CERCLIS, renamed to SEMS by the EPA in 2015. The list contains data on potentially hazardous
waste sites that have been reported to the USEPA by states, municipalities, private companies and private persons,
pursuant to Section 103 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA).
This dataset also contains sites which are either proposed to or on the National Priorities List (NPL) and the
sites which are in the screening and assessment phase for possible inclusion on the NPL.
Date of Government Version: 03/07/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/05/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/15/2016
Number of Days to Update: 10
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/22/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/31/2016
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
Federal CERCLIS NFRAP site list
SEMS-ARCHIVE: Superfund Enterprise Management System Archive
TC4721182.2s Page GR-2
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
SEMS-ARCHIVE (Superfund Enterprise Management System Archive) tracks sites that have no further interest under
the Federal Superfund Program based on available information. The list was formerly known as the CERCLIS-NFRAP,
renamed to SEMS ARCHIVE by the EPA in 2015. EPA may perform a minimal level of assessment work at a site while
it is archived if site conditions change and/or new information becomes available. Archived sites have been removed
and archived from the inventory of SEMS sites. Archived status indicates that, to the best of EPA’s knowledge,
assessment at a site has been completed and that EPA has determined no further steps will be taken to list the
site on the National Priorities List (NPL), unless information indicates this decision was not appropriate or
other considerations require a recommendation for listing at a later time. The decision does not necessarily mean
that there is no hazard associated with a given site; it only means that. based upon available information, the
location is not judged to be potential NPL site.
Date of Government Version: 03/07/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/05/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/15/2016
Number of Days to Update: 10
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/22/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/31/2016
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
Federal RCRA CORRACTS facilities list
CORRACTS: Corrective Action Report
CORRACTS identifies hazardous waste handlers with RCRA corrective action activity.
Date of Government Version: 06/27/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/30/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/02/2016
Number of Days to Update: 64
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/30/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/10/2016
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
Federal RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD facilities list
RCRA-TSDF: RCRA - Treatment, Storage and Disposal
RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database
includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste
as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Transporters are individuals or entities that
move hazardous waste from the generator offsite to a facility that can recycle, treat, store, or dispose of the
waste. TSDFs treat, store, or dispose of the waste.
Date of Government Version: 06/21/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/30/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/02/2016
Number of Days to Update: 64
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/30/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/17/2016
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
Federal RCRA generators list
RCRA-LQG: RCRA - Large Quantity Generators
RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database
includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste
as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Large quantity generators (LQGs) generate
over 1,000 kilograms (kg) of hazardous waste, or over 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste per month.
Date of Government Version: 06/21/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/30/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/02/2016
Number of Days to Update: 64
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/30/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/17/2016
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
TC4721182.2s Page GR-3
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
RCRA-SQG: RCRA - Small Quantity Generators
RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database
includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste
as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Small quantity generators (SQGs) generate
between 100 kg and 1,000 kg of hazardous waste per month.
Date of Government Version: 06/21/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/30/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/02/2016
Number of Days to Update: 64
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/30/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/17/2016
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
RCRA-CESQG: RCRA - Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generators
RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database
includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste
as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Conditionally exempt small quantity generators
(CESQGs) generate less than 100 kg of hazardous waste, or less than 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste per month.
Date of Government Version: 06/21/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/30/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/02/2016
Number of Days to Update: 64
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/30/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/17/2016
Data Release Frequency: Varies
Federal institutional controls / engineering controls registries
LUCIS: Land Use Control Information System
LUCIS contains records of land use control information pertaining to the former Navy Base Realignment and Closure
properties.
Date of Government Version: 05/28/2015
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/29/2015
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/11/2015
Number of Days to Update: 13
Source: Department of the Navy
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 08/12/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/28/2016
Data Release Frequency: Varies
US ENG CONTROLS: Engineering Controls Sites List
A listing of sites with engineering controls in place. Engineering controls include various forms of caps, building
foundations, liners, and treatment methods to create pathway elimination for regulated substances to enter environmental
media or effect human health.
Date of Government Version: 05/09/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/01/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/02/2016
Number of Days to Update: 93
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 08/31/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/12/2016
Data Release Frequency: Varies
US INST CONTROL: Sites with Institutional Controls
A listing of sites with institutional controls in place. Institutional controls include administrative measures,
such as groundwater use restrictions, construction restrictions, property use restrictions, and post remediation
care requirements intended to prevent exposure to contaminants remaining on site. Deed restrictions are generally
required as part of the institutional controls.
Date of Government Version: 05/09/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/01/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/02/2016
Number of Days to Update: 93
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 08/31/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/12/2016
Data Release Frequency: Varies
TC4721182.2s Page GR-4
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Federal ERNS list
ERNS: Emergency Response Notification System
Emergency Response Notification System. ERNS records and stores information on reported releases of oil and hazardous
substances.
Date of Government Version: 03/28/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/30/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/20/2016
Number of Days to Update: 51
Source: National Response Center, United States Coast Guard
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/28/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/10/2016
Data Release Frequency: Annually
State- and tribal - equivalent NPL
NC HSDS: Hazardous Substance Disposal Site
Locations of uncontrolled and unregulated hazardous waste sites. The file includes sites on the National Priority
List as well as those on the state priority list.
Date of Government Version: 08/09/2011
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/08/2011
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/05/2011
Number of Days to Update: 27
Source: North Carolina Center for Geographic Information and Analysis
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/29/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/14/2016
Data Release Frequency: Biennially
State- and tribal - equivalent CERCLIS
NC SHWS: Inactive Hazardous Sites Inventory
State Hazardous Waste Sites. State hazardous waste site records are the states’ equivalent to CERCLIS. These sites
may or may not already be listed on the federal CERCLIS list. Priority sites planned for cleanup using state funds
(state equivalent of Superfund) are identified along with sites where cleanup will be paid for by potentially
responsible parties. Available information varies by state.
Date of Government Version: 04/29/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/15/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/01/2016
Number of Days to Update: 78
Source: Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/15/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/26/2016
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
SC SHWS: Site Assessment Section Project List
State Hazardous Waste Sites. State hazardous waste site records are the states’ equivalent to CERCLIS. These sites
may or may not already be listed on the federal CERCLIS list. Priority sites planned for cleanup using state funds
(state equivalent of Superfund) are identified along with sites where cleanup will be paid for by potentially
responsible parties. Available information varies by state.
Date of Government Version: 06/28/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/30/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/01/2016
Number of Days to Update: 63
Source: Department of Health and Environmental Control
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 08/23/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/26/2016
Data Release Frequency: Annually
State and tribal landfill and/or solid waste disposal site lists
NC SWF/LF: List of Solid Waste Facilities
Solid Waste Facilities/Landfill Sites. SWF/LF type records typically contain an inventory of solid waste disposal
facilities or landfills in a particular state. Depending on the state, these may be active or inactive facilities
or open dumps that failed to meet RCRA Subtitle D Section 4004 criteria for solid waste landfills or disposal
sites.
Date of Government Version: 03/17/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/31/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/18/2016
Number of Days to Update: 48
Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/01/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/10/2016
Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually
TC4721182.2s Page GR-5
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
SC SWF/LF: Permitted Landfills List
Solid Waste Facilities/Landfill Sites. SWF/LF type records typically contain an inventory of solid waste disposal
facilities or landfills in a particular state. Depending on the state, these may be active or inactive facilities
or open dumps that failed to meet RCRA Subtitle D Section 4004 criteria for solid waste landfills or disposal
sites.
Date of Government Version: 06/13/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/14/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/01/2016
Number of Days to Update: 79
Source: Department of Health and Environmental Control
Telephone: [phone]
Source: Department of Health and Environmental Control, GIS Section
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/13/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/26/2016
Data Release Frequency: Varies
NC OLI: Old Landfill Inventory
Old landfill inventory location information. (Does not include no further action sites and other agency lead
sites).
Date of Government Version: 03/27/2015
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/17/2015
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/30/2015
Number of Days to Update: 13
Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/15/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/24/2016
Data Release Frequency: Varies
State and tribal leaking storage tank lists
NC LAST: Leaking Aboveground Storage Tanks
A listing of leaking aboveground storage tank site locations.
Date of Government Version: 05/06/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/12/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/11/2016
Number of Days to Update: 60
Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 08/10/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/21/2016
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
NC LUST: Regional UST Database
This database contains information obtained from the Regional Offices. It provides a more detailed explanation
of current and historic activity for individual sites, as well as what was previously found in the Incident Management
Database. Sites in this database with Incident Numbers are considered LUSTs.
Date of Government Version: 05/06/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/12/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/11/2016
Number of Days to Update: 60
Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 08/10/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/21/2016
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
SC LUST: Leaking Underground Storage Tank List
Leaking Underground Storage Tank Incident Reports. LUST records contain an inventory of reported leaking underground
storage tank incidents. Not all states maintain these records, and the information stored varies by state.
Date of Government Version: 03/14/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/15/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/12/2016
Number of Days to Update: 119
Source: Department of Health and Environmental Control
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/21/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/07/2016
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
INDIAN LUST R10: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
LUSTs on Indian land in Alaska, Idaho, Oregon and Washington.
TC4721182.2s Page GR-6
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version: 01/07/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/08/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/18/2016
Number of Days to Update: 41
Source: EPA Region 10
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/27/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/07/2016
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
INDIAN LUST R9: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
LUSTs on Indian land in Arizona, California, New Mexico and Nevada
Date of Government Version: 02/25/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/27/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/03/2016
Number of Days to Update: 37
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/27/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/07/2016
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
INDIAN LUST R7: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
LUSTs on Indian land in Iowa, Kansas, and Nebraska
Date of Government Version: 10/09/2015
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/12/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/03/2016
Number of Days to Update: 112
Source: EPA Region 7
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/27/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/07/2016
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN LUST R6: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
LUSTs on Indian land in New Mexico and Oklahoma.
Date of Government Version: 12/11/2015
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/19/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/03/2016
Number of Days to Update: 105
Source: EPA Region 6
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/27/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/07/2016
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN LUST R4: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
LUSTs on Indian land in Florida, Mississippi and North Carolina.
Date of Government Version: 02/05/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/29/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/03/2016
Number of Days to Update: 35
Source: EPA Region 4
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/26/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/07/2016
Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually
INDIAN LUST R1: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
A listing of leaking underground storage tank locations on Indian Land.
Date of Government Version: 10/27/2015
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/29/2015
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/04/2016
Number of Days to Update: 67
Source: EPA Region 1
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/29/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/07/2016
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN LUST R5: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
Leaking underground storage tanks located on Indian Land in Michigan, Minnesota and Wisconsin.
Date of Government Version: 02/17/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/27/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/03/2016
Number of Days to Update: 37
Source: EPA, Region 5
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/27/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/07/2016
Data Release Frequency: Varies
TC4721182.2s Page GR-7
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
INDIAN LUST R8: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
LUSTs on Indian land in Colorado, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Utah and Wyoming.
Date of Government Version: 10/13/2015
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/23/2015
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/18/2016
Number of Days to Update: 118
Source: EPA Region 8
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/27/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/07/2016
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
NC LUST TRUST: State Trust Fund Database
This database contains information about claims against the State Trust Funds for reimbursements for expenses
incurred while remediating Leaking USTs.
Date of Government Version: 07/07/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/15/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/01/2016
Number of Days to Update: 48
Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/15/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/24/2016
Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually
State and tribal registered storage tank lists
FEMA UST: Underground Storage Tank Listing
A listing of all FEMA owned underground storage tanks.
Date of Government Version: 01/01/2010
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/16/2010
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/12/2010
Number of Days to Update: 55
Source: FEMA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/07/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/24/2016
Data Release Frequency: Varies
NC UST: Petroleum Underground Storage Tank Database
Registered Underground Storage Tanks. UST’s are regulated under Subtitle I of the Resource Conservation and Recovery
Act (RCRA) and must be registered with the state department responsible for administering the UST program. Available
information varies by state program.
Date of Government Version: 05/06/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/12/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/11/2016
Number of Days to Update: 60
Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 08/10/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/21/2016
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
SC UST: Comprehensive Underground Storage Tanks
Registered Underground Storage Tanks. UST’s are regulated under Subtitle I of the Resource Conservation and Recovery
Act (RCRA) and must be registered with the state department responsible for administering the UST program. Available
information varies by state program.
Date of Government Version: 05/20/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/02/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/12/2016
Number of Days to Update: 40
Source: Department of Health and Environmental Control
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/21/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/07/2016
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
NC AST: AST Database
Facilities with aboveground storage tanks that have a capacity greater than 21,000 gallons.
Date of Government Version: 02/10/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/20/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/01/2016
Number of Days to Update: 73
Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/16/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/03/2016
Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually
TC4721182.2s Page GR-8
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
SC AST: Aboveground Storage Tank List
Registered Aboveground Storage Tanks.
Date of Government Version: 03/25/2004
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/04/2004
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/23/2004
Number of Days to Update: 50
Source: Department of Health and Environmental Control
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 08/29/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/12/2016
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN UST R10: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian
land in EPA Region 10 (Alaska, Idaho, Oregon, Washington, and Tribal Nations).
Date of Government Version: 01/07/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/08/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/18/2016
Number of Days to Update: 41
Source: EPA Region 10
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/27/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/07/2016
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
INDIAN UST R9: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian
land in EPA Region 9 (Arizona, California, Hawaii, Nevada, the Pacific Islands, and Tribal Nations).
Date of Government Version: 02/25/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/27/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/03/2016
Number of Days to Update: 37
Source: EPA Region 9
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/27/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/07/2016
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
INDIAN UST R8: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian
land in EPA Region 8 (Colorado, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Utah, Wyoming and 27 Tribal Nations).
Date of Government Version: 01/26/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/05/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/03/2016
Number of Days to Update: 119
Source: EPA Region 8
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/27/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/07/2016
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
INDIAN UST R7: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian
land in EPA Region 7 (Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, Nebraska, and 9 Tribal Nations).
Date of Government Version: 09/23/2014
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/25/2014
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/29/2015
Number of Days to Update: 65
Source: EPA Region 7
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/27/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/07/2016
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN UST R6: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian
land in EPA Region 6 (Louisiana, Arkansas, Oklahoma, New Mexico, Texas and 65 Tribes).
Date of Government Version: 12/03/2015
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/04/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/03/2016
Number of Days to Update: 120
Source: EPA Region 6
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/27/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/07/2016
Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually
TC4721182.2s Page GR-9
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
INDIAN UST R5: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian
land in EPA Region 5 (Michigan, Minnesota and Wisconsin and Tribal Nations).
Date of Government Version: 11/05/2015
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/13/2015
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/04/2016
Number of Days to Update: 52
Source: EPA Region 5
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/27/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/07/2016
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN UST R1: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian
land in EPA Region 1 (Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, Vermont and ten Tribal
Nations).
Date of Government Version: 10/20/2015
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/29/2015
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/04/2016
Number of Days to Update: 67
Source: EPA, Region 1
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/29/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/07/2016
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN UST R4: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land
The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian
land in EPA Region 4 (Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee
and Tribal Nations)
Date of Government Version: 02/05/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/29/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/03/2016
Number of Days to Update: 35
Source: EPA Region 4
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/26/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/07/2016
Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually
State and tribal institutional control / engineering control registries
NC INST CONTROL: No Further Action Sites With Land Use Restrictions Monitoring
A land use restricted site is a property where there are limits or requirements on future use of the property
due to varying levels of cleanup possible, practical, or necessary at the site.
Date of Government Version: 04/29/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/15/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/01/2016
Number of Days to Update: 78
Source: Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/15/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/26/2016
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
State and tribal voluntary cleanup sites
NC VCP: Responsible Party Voluntary Action Sites
Responsible Party Voluntary Action site locations.
Date of Government Version: 04/29/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/15/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/01/2016
Number of Days to Update: 78
Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/15/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/26/2016
Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually
INDIAN VCP R1: Voluntary Cleanup Priority Listing
A listing of voluntary cleanup priority sites located on Indian Land located in Region 1.
Date of Government Version: 07/27/2015
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/29/2015
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/18/2016
Number of Days to Update: 142
Source: EPA, Region 1
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/01/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/10/2016
Data Release Frequency: Varies
TC4721182.2s Page GR-10
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
SC VCP: Voluntary Cleanup Sites
Sites participating in the Voluntary Cleanup Program. Once staff and a non-responsible party have agreed upon
an approved scope of work for a site investigation and/or remediation, the party enters into a voluntary cleanup
contract. Staff oversees the cleanup efforts to ensure that activities are performed to our satisfaction. Upon
completion of the negotiated work in the voluntary cleanup contract, the non-responsible party receives State
Superfund liability protection.
Date of Government Version: 02/26/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/16/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/01/2016
Number of Days to Update: 77
Source: Department of Health and Environmental Control
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/13/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/26/2016
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN VCP R7: Voluntary Cleanup Priority Lisitng
A listing of voluntary cleanup priority sites located on Indian Land located in Region 7.
Date of Government Version: 03/20/2008
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/22/2008
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/19/2008
Number of Days to Update: 27
Source: EPA, Region 7
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 04/20/2009
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/20/2009
Data Release Frequency: Varies
State and tribal Brownfields sites
NC BROWNFIELDS: Brownfields Projects Inventory
A brownfield site is an abandoned, idled, or underused property where the threat of environmental contamination
has hindered its redevelopment. All of the sites in the inventory are working toward a brownfield agreement for
cleanup and liabitliy control.
Date of Government Version: 07/01/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/07/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/01/2016
Number of Days to Update: 56
Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/07/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/17/2016
Data Release Frequency: Varies
SC BROWNFIELDS: Brownfields Sites Listing
The Brownfields component of the Voluntary Cleanup Program allows a non-responsible party to acquire a contaminated
property with State Superfund liability protection for existing contamination by agreeing to perform an environmental
assessment and/or remediation.
Date of Government Version: 02/26/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/16/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/01/2016
Number of Days to Update: 77
Source: Department of Health & Environmental Control
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/13/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/26/2016
Data Release Frequency: Varies
ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS
Local Brownfield lists
US BROWNFIELDS: A Listing of Brownfields Sites
Brownfields are real property, the expansion, redevelopment, or reuse of which may be complicated by the presence
or potential presence of a hazardous substance, pollutant, or contaminant. Cleaning up and reinvesting in these
properties takes development pressures off of undeveloped, open land, and both improves and protects the environment.
Assessment, Cleanup and Redevelopment Exchange System (ACRES) stores information reported by EPA Brownfields
grant recipients on brownfields properties assessed or cleaned up with grant funding as well as information on
Targeted Brownfields Assessments performed by EPA Regions. A listing of ACRES Brownfield sites is obtained from
Cleanups in My Community. Cleanups in My Community provides information on Brownfields properties for which information
is reported back to EPA, as well as areas served by Brownfields grant programs.
TC4721182.2s Page GR-11
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version: 06/21/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/22/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/02/2016
Number of Days to Update: 72
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/22/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/03/2016
Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually
Local Lists of Landfill / Solid Waste Disposal Sites
NC HIST LF: Solid Waste Facility Listing
A listing of solid waste facilities.
Date of Government Version: 11/06/2006
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/13/2007
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/02/2007
Number of Days to Update: 17
Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 01/19/2009
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
NC SWRCY: Recycling Center Listing
A listing of recycling center locations.
Date of Government Version: 05/19/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/24/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/11/2016
Number of Days to Update: 48
Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/29/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/14/2016
Data Release Frequency: Varies
SC SWRCY: Solid Waste Recycling Facilities
A listing of recycling center locations.
Date of Government Version: 01/27/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/04/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/01/2016
Number of Days to Update: 28
Source: Department of Health & Enviornmental Control
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 08/29/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/12/2016
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INDIAN ODI: Report on the Status of Open Dumps on Indian Lands
Location of open dumps on Indian land.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/1998
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/03/2007
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/24/2008
Number of Days to Update: 52
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 08/05/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/14/2016
Data Release Frequency: Varies
DEBRIS REGION 9: Torres Martinez Reservation Illegal Dump Site Locations
A listing of illegal dump sites location on the Torres Martinez Indian Reservation located in eastern Riverside
County and northern Imperial County, California.
Date of Government Version: 01/12/2009
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/07/2009
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/21/2009
Number of Days to Update: 137
Source: EPA, Region 9
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/20/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/07/2016
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
ODI: Open Dump Inventory
An open dump is defined as a disposal facility that does not comply with one or more of the Part 257 or Part 258
Subtitle D Criteria.
Date of Government Version: 06/30/1985
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/09/2004
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/17/2004
Number of Days to Update: 39
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/09/2004
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
TC4721182.2s Page GR-12
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Local Lists of Hazardous waste / Contaminated Sites
US HIST CDL: National Clandestine Laboratory Register
A listing of clandestine drug lab locations that have been removed from the DEAs National Clandestine Laboratory
Register.
Date of Government Version: 05/04/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/03/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/13/2016
Number of Days to Update: 40
Source: Drug Enforcement Administration
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 05/31/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/13/2016
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
US CDL: Clandestine Drug Labs
A listing of clandestine drug lab locations. The U.S. Department of Justice ("the Department") provides this
web site as a public service. It contains addresses of some locations where law enforcement agencies reported
they found chemicals or other items that indicated the presence of either clandestine drug laboratories or dumpsites.
In most cases, the source of the entries is not the Department, and the Department has not verified the entry
and does not guarantee its accuracy. Members of the public must verify the accuracy of all entries by, for example,
contacting local law enforcement and local health departments.
Date of Government Version: 05/04/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/03/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/13/2016
Number of Days to Update: 40
Source: Drug Enforcement Administration
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 08/31/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/12/2016
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
Local Land Records
LIENS 2: CERCLA Lien Information
A Federal CERCLA (’Superfund’) lien can exist by operation of law at any site or property at which EPA has spent
Superfund monies. These monies are spent to investigate and address releases and threatened releases of contamination.
CERCLIS provides information as to the identity of these sites and properties.
Date of Government Version: 02/18/2014
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/18/2014
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/24/2014
Number of Days to Update: 37
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/29/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/07/2016
Data Release Frequency: Varies
Records of Emergency Release Reports
HMIRS: Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System
Hazardous Materials Incident Report System. HMIRS contains hazardous material spill incidents reported to DOT.
Date of Government Version: 06/24/2015
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/26/2015
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/02/2015
Number of Days to Update: 68
Source: U.S. Department of Transportation
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/28/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/10/2016
Data Release Frequency: Annually
NC SPILLS: Spills Incident Listing
A listing spills, hazardous material releases, sanitary sewer overflows, wastewater treatment plant bypasses and
upsets, citizen complaints, and any other environmental emergency calls reported to the agency.
Date of Government Version: 07/11/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/18/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/01/2016
Number of Days to Update: 45
Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/11/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/26/2016
Data Release Frequency: Varies
TC4721182.2s Page GR-13
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
SC SPILLS: Spill List
Spills and releases of petroleum and hazardous chemicals reported to the Oil & Chemical Emergency Response division.
Date of Government Version: 02/11/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/24/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/01/2016
Number of Days to Update: 37
Source: Department of Health and Environmental Control
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 05/31/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/12/2016
Data Release Frequency: Varies
NC IMD: Incident Management Database
Groundwater and/or soil contamination incidents
Date of Government Version: 07/21/2006
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/01/2006
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/23/2006
Number of Days to Update: 22
Source: Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/01/2011
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/17/2011
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
NC SPILLS 90: SPILLS90 data from FirstSearch
Spills 90 includes those spill and release records available exclusively from FirstSearch databases. Typically,
they may include chemical, oil and/or hazardous substance spills recorded after 1990. Duplicate records that are
already included in EDR incident and release records are not included in Spills 90.
Date of Government Version: 09/27/2012
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/03/2013
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/06/2013
Number of Days to Update: 62
Source: FirstSearch
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 01/03/2013
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
SC SPILLS 90: SPILLS90 data from FirstSearch
Spills 90 includes those spill and release records available exclusively from FirstSearch databases. Typically,
they may include chemical, oil and/or hazardous substance spills recorded after 1990. Duplicate records that are
already included in EDR incident and release records are not included in Spills 90.
Date of Government Version: 10/25/2012
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/03/2013
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/07/2013
Number of Days to Update: 63
Source: FirstSearch
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 01/03/2013
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
NC SPILLS 80: SPILLS80 data from FirstSearch
Spills 80 includes those spill and release records available from FirstSearch databases prior to 1990. Typically,
they may include chemical, oil and/or hazardous substance spills recorded before 1990. Duplicate records that
are already included in EDR incident and release records are not included in Spills 80.
Date of Government Version: 06/14/2001
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/03/2013
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/06/2013
Number of Days to Update: 62
Source: FirstSearch
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 01/03/2013
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
SC SPILLS 80: SPILLS80 data from FirstSearch
Spills 80 includes those spill and release records available from FirstSearch databases prior to 1990. Typically,
they may include chemical, oil and/or hazardous substance spills recorded before 1990. Duplicate records that
are already included in EDR incident and release records are not included in Spills 80.
Date of Government Version: 03/26/2001
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/03/2013
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/07/2013
Number of Days to Update: 63
Source: FirstSearch
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 01/03/2013
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
TC4721182.2s Page GR-14
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Other Ascertainable Records
RCRA NonGen / NLR: RCRA - Non Generators / No Longer Regulated
RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database
includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste
as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Non-Generators do not presently generate hazardous
waste.
Date of Government Version: 06/21/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/30/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/02/2016
Number of Days to Update: 64
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/30/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/17/2016
Data Release Frequency: Varies
FUDS: Formerly Used Defense Sites
The listing includes locations of Formerly Used Defense Sites properties where the US Army Corps of Engineers
is actively working or will take necessary cleanup actions.
Date of Government Version: 01/31/2015
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/08/2015
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/13/2015
Number of Days to Update: 97
Source: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/10/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/19/2016
Data Release Frequency: Varies
DOD: Department of Defense Sites
This data set consists of federally owned or administered lands, administered by the Department of Defense, that
have any area equal to or greater than 640 acres of the United States, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2005
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/10/2006
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/11/2007
Number of Days to Update: 62
Source: USGS
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/15/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/24/2016
Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually
FEDLAND: Federal and Indian Lands
Federally and Indian administrated lands of the United States. Lands included are administrated by: Army Corps
of Engineers, Bureau of Reclamation, National Wild and Scenic River, National Wildlife Refuge, Public Domain Land,
Wilderness, Wilderness Study Area, Wildlife Management Area, Bureau of Indian Affairs, Bureau of Land Management,
Department of Justice, Forest Service, Fish and Wildlife Service, National Park Service.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2005
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/06/2006
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/11/2007
Number of Days to Update: 339
Source: U.S. Geological Survey
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/15/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/24/2016
Data Release Frequency: N/A
SCRD DRYCLEANERS: State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners Listing
The State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners was established in 1998, with support from the U.S. EPA Office
of Superfund Remediation and Technology Innovation. It is comprised of representatives of states with established
drycleaner remediation programs. Currently the member states are Alabama, Connecticut, Florida, Illinois, Kansas,
Minnesota, Missouri, North Carolina, Oregon, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, and Wisconsin.
Date of Government Version: 03/07/2011
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/09/2011
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/02/2011
Number of Days to Update: 54
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 08/15/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/28/2016
Data Release Frequency: Varies
TC4721182.2s Page GR-15
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
US FIN ASSUR: Financial Assurance Information
All owners and operators of facilities that treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste are required to provide
proof that they will have sufficient funds to pay for the clean up, closure, and post-closure care of their facilities.
Date of Government Version: 05/08/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/18/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/02/2016
Number of Days to Update: 107
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 08/17/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/28/2016
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
EPA WATCH LIST: EPA WATCH LIST
EPA maintains a "Watch List" to facilitate dialogue between EPA, state and local environmental agencies on enforcement
matters relating to facilities with alleged violations identified as either significant or high priority. Being
on the Watch List does not mean that the facility has actually violated the law only that an investigation by
EPA or a state or local environmental agency has led those organizations to allege that an unproven violation
has in fact occurred. Being on the Watch List does not represent a higher level of concern regarding the alleged
violations that were detected, but instead indicates cases requiring additional dialogue between EPA, state and
local agencies - primarily because of the length of time the alleged violation has gone unaddressed or unresolved.
Date of Government Version: 08/30/2013
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/21/2014
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/17/2014
Number of Days to Update: 88
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 08/08/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/21/2016
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
2020 COR ACTION: 2020 Corrective Action Program List
The EPA has set ambitious goals for the RCRA Corrective Action program by creating the 2020 Corrective Action
Universe. This RCRA cleanup baseline includes facilities expected to need corrective action. The 2020 universe
contains a wide variety of sites. Some properties are heavily contaminated while others were contaminated but
have since been cleaned up. Still others have not been fully investigated yet, and may require little or no remediation.
Inclusion in the 2020 Universe does not necessarily imply failure on the part of a facility to meet its RCRA obligations.
Date of Government Version: 04/22/2013
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/03/2015
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/09/2015
Number of Days to Update: 6
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 09/06/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/21/2016
Data Release Frequency: Varies
TSCA: Toxic Substances Control Act
Toxic Substances Control Act. TSCA identifies manufacturers and importers of chemical substances included on the
TSCA Chemical Substance Inventory list. It includes data on the production volume of these substances by plant
site.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2012
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/15/2015
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/29/2015
Number of Days to Update: 14
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/24/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/03/2016
Data Release Frequency: Every 4 Years
TRIS: Toxic Chemical Release Inventory System
Toxic Release Inventory System. TRIS identifies facilities which release toxic chemicals to the air, water and
land in reportable quantities under SARA Title III Section 313.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2014
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/24/2015
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/05/2016
Number of Days to Update: 133
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 08/26/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/05/2016
Data Release Frequency: Annually
TC4721182.2s Page GR-16
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
SSTS: Section 7 Tracking Systems
Section 7 of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act, as amended (92 Stat. 829) requires all
registered pesticide-producing establishments to submit a report to the Environmental Protection Agency by March
1st each year. Each establishment must report the types and amounts of pesticides, active ingredients and devices
being produced, and those having been produced and sold or distributed in the past year.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2009
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/10/2010
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/25/2011
Number of Days to Update: 77
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/25/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/07/2016
Data Release Frequency: Annually
ROD: Records Of Decision
Record of Decision. ROD documents mandate a permanent remedy at an NPL (Superfund) site containing technical
and health information to aid in the cleanup.
Date of Government Version: 11/25/2013
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/12/2013
Date Made Active in Reports: 02/24/2014
Number of Days to Update: 74
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/07/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/19/2016
Data Release Frequency: Annually
RMP: Risk Management Plans
When Congress passed the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990, it required EPA to publish regulations and guidance
for chemical accident prevention at facilities using extremely hazardous substances. The Risk Management Program
Rule (RMP Rule) was written to implement Section 112(r) of these amendments. The rule, which built upon existing
industry codes and standards, requires companies of all sizes that use certain flammable and toxic substances
to develop a Risk Management Program, which includes a(n): Hazard assessment that details the potential effects
of an accidental release, an accident history of the last five years, and an evaluation of worst-case and alternative
accidental releases; Prevention program that includes safety precautions and maintenance, monitoring, and employee
training measures; and Emergency response program that spells out emergency health care, employee training measures
and procedures for informing the public and response agencies (e.g the fire department) should an accident occur.
Date of Government Version: 05/01/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/26/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/02/2016
Number of Days to Update: 99
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/25/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/07/2016
Data Release Frequency: Varies
RAATS: RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System
RCRA Administration Action Tracking System. RAATS contains records based on enforcement actions issued under RCRA
pertaining to major violators and includes administrative and civil actions brought by the EPA. For administration
actions after September 30, 1995, data entry in the RAATS database was discontinued. EPA will retain a copy of
the database for historical records. It was necessary to terminate RAATS because a decrease in agency resources
made it impossible to continue to update the information contained in the database.
Date of Government Version: 04/17/1995
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/03/1995
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/07/1995
Number of Days to Update: 35
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/02/2008
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/01/2008
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
PRP: Potentially Responsible Parties
A listing of verified Potentially Responsible Parties
Date of Government Version: 10/25/2013
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/17/2014
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/20/2014
Number of Days to Update: 3
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 08/12/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/21/2016
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
TC4721182.2s Page GR-17
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
PADS: PCB Activity Database System
PCB Activity Database. PADS Identifies generators, transporters, commercial storers and/or brokers and disposers
of PCB’s who are required to notify the EPA of such activities.
Date of Government Version: 01/20/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/28/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/02/2016
Number of Days to Update: 127
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/15/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/24/2016
Data Release Frequency: Annually
ICIS: Integrated Compliance Information System
The Integrated Compliance Information System (ICIS) supports the information needs of the national enforcement
and compliance program as well as the unique needs of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)
program.
Date of Government Version: 01/23/2015
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/06/2015
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/09/2015
Number of Days to Update: 31
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/07/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/24/2016
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
FTTS: FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act)
FTTS tracks administrative cases and pesticide enforcement actions and compliance activities related to FIFRA,
TSCA and EPCRA (Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act). To maintain currency, EDR contacts the
Agency on a quarterly basis.
Date of Government Version: 04/09/2009
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/16/2009
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/11/2009
Number of Days to Update: 25
Source: EPA/Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 08/17/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/05/2016
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
FTTS INSP: FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act)
A listing of FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System (FTTS) inspections and enforcements.
Date of Government Version: 04/09/2009
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/16/2009
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/11/2009
Number of Days to Update: 25
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 08/17/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/05/2016
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
MLTS: Material Licensing Tracking System
MLTS is maintained by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission and contains a list of approximately 8,100 sites which
possess or use radioactive materials and which are subject to NRC licensing requirements. To maintain currency,
EDR contacts the Agency on a quarterly basis.
Date of Government Version: 03/07/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/18/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/15/2016
Number of Days to Update: 28
Source: Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 09/05/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/21/2016
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
COAL ASH DOE: Steam-Electric Plant Operation Data
A listing of power plants that store ash in surface ponds.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2005
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/07/2009
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/22/2009
Number of Days to Update: 76
Source: Department of Energy
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/09/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/19/2016
Data Release Frequency: Varies
TC4721182.2s Page GR-18
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
COAL ASH EPA: Coal Combustion Residues Surface Impoundments List
A listing of coal combustion residues surface impoundments with high hazard potential ratings.
Date of Government Version: 07/01/2014
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/10/2014
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/20/2014
Number of Days to Update: 40
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 09/06/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/19/2016
Data Release Frequency: Varies
PCB TRANSFORMER: PCB Transformer Registration Database
The database of PCB transformer registrations that includes all PCB registration submittals.
Date of Government Version: 02/01/2011
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/19/2011
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/10/2012
Number of Days to Update: 83
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/29/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/07/2016
Data Release Frequency: Varies
RADINFO: Radiation Information Database
The Radiation Information Database (RADINFO) contains information about facilities that are regulated by U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regulations for radiation and radioactivity.
Date of Government Version: 07/07/2015
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/09/2015
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/16/2015
Number of Days to Update: 69
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/07/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/17/2016
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
HIST FTTS: FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Administrative Case Listing
A complete administrative case listing from the FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System (FTTS) for all ten EPA regions. The
information was obtained from the National Compliance Database (NCDB). NCDB supports the implementation of FIFRA
(Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act) and TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act). Some EPA regions
are now closing out records. Because of that, and the fact that some EPA regions are not providing EPA Headquarters
with updated records, it was decided to create a HIST FTTS database. It included records that may not be included
in the newer FTTS database updates. This database is no longer updated.
Date of Government Version: 10/19/2006
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/01/2007
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/10/2007
Number of Days to Update: 40
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/17/2007
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/17/2008
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
HIST FTTS INSP: FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Inspection & Enforcement Case Listing
A complete inspection and enforcement case listing from the FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System (FTTS) for all ten EPA
regions. The information was obtained from the National Compliance Database (NCDB). NCDB supports the implementation
of FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act) and TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act). Some
EPA regions are now closing out records. Because of that, and the fact that some EPA regions are not providing
EPA Headquarters with updated records, it was decided to create a HIST FTTS database. It included records that
may not be included in the newer FTTS database updates. This database is no longer updated.
Date of Government Version: 10/19/2006
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/01/2007
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/10/2007
Number of Days to Update: 40
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/17/2008
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/17/2008
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
DOT OPS: Incident and Accident Data
Department of Transporation, Office of Pipeline Safety Incident and Accident data.
TC4721182.2s Page GR-19
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version: 07/31/2012
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/07/2012
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/18/2012
Number of Days to Update: 42
Source: Department of Transporation, Office of Pipeline Safety
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 08/02/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/14/2016
Data Release Frequency: Varies
CONSENT: Superfund (CERCLA) Consent Decrees
Major legal settlements that establish responsibility and standards for cleanup at NPL (Superfund) sites. Released
periodically by United States District Courts after settlement by parties to litigation matters.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2015
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/06/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/02/2016
Number of Days to Update: 149
Source: Department of Justice, Consent Decree Library
Telephone: Varies
Last EDR Contact: 07/15/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/10/2016
Data Release Frequency: Varies
BRS: Biennial Reporting System
The Biennial Reporting System is a national system administered by the EPA that collects data on the generation
and management of hazardous waste. BRS captures detailed data from two groups: Large Quantity Generators (LQG)
and Treatment, Storage, and Disposal Facilities.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2013
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/24/2015
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/30/2015
Number of Days to Update: 218
Source: EPA/NTIS
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 08/26/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/05/2016
Data Release Frequency: Biennially
INDIAN RESERV: Indian Reservations
This map layer portrays Indian administered lands of the United States that have any area equal to or greater
than 640 acres.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2005
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/08/2006
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/11/2007
Number of Days to Update: 34
Source: USGS
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/15/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/24/2016
Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually
FUSRAP: Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program
DOE established the Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP) in 1974 to remediate sites where
radioactive contamination remained from Manhattan Project and early U.S. Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) operations.
Date of Government Version: 03/11/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/15/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/03/2016
Number of Days to Update: 80
Source: Department of Energy
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/26/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/21/2016
Data Release Frequency: Varies
UMTRA: Uranium Mill Tailings Sites
Uranium ore was mined by private companies for federal government use in national defense programs. When the mills
shut down, large piles of the sand-like material (mill tailings) remain after uranium has been extracted from
the ore. Levels of human exposure to radioactive materials from the piles are low; however, in some cases tailings
were used as construction materials before the potential health hazards of the tailings were recognized.
Date of Government Version: 09/14/2010
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/07/2011
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/01/2012
Number of Days to Update: 146
Source: Department of Energy
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 08/23/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/05/2016
Data Release Frequency: Varies
TC4721182.2s Page GR-20
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
LEAD SMELTER 1: Lead Smelter Sites
A listing of former lead smelter site locations.
Date of Government Version: 03/07/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/07/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/02/2016
Number of Days to Update: 148
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/08/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/17/2016
Data Release Frequency: Varies
LEAD SMELTER 2: Lead Smelter Sites
A list of several hundred sites in the U.S. where secondary lead smelting was done from 1931and 1964. These sites
may pose a threat to public health through ingestion or inhalation of contaminated soil or dust
Date of Government Version: 04/05/2001
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/27/2010
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/02/2010
Number of Days to Update: 36
Source: American Journal of Public Health
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 12/02/2009
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
US AIRS (AFS): Aerometric Information Retrieval System Facility Subsystem (AFS)
The database is a sub-system of Aerometric Information Retrieval System (AIRS). AFS contains compliance data
on air pollution point sources regulated by the U.S. EPA and/or state and local air regulatory agencies. This
information comes from source reports by various stationary sources of air pollution, such as electric power plants,
steel mills, factories, and universities, and provides information about the air pollutants they produce. Action,
air program, air program pollutant, and general level plant data. It is used to track emissions and compliance
data from industrial plants.
Date of Government Version: 10/20/2015
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/27/2015
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/04/2016
Number of Days to Update: 69
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/22/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/10/2016
Data Release Frequency: Annually
US AIRS MINOR: Air Facility System Data
A listing of minor source facilities.
Date of Government Version: 10/20/2015
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/27/2015
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/04/2016
Number of Days to Update: 69
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/22/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/10/2016
Data Release Frequency: Annually
US MINES: Mines Master Index File
Contains all mine identification numbers issued for mines active or opened since 1971. The data also includes
violation information.
Date of Government Version: 02/09/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/02/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/15/2016
Number of Days to Update: 44
Source: Department of Labor, Mine Safety and Health Administration
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 09/01/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/12/2016
Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually
US MINES 2: Ferrous and Nonferrous Metal Mines Database Listing
This map layer includes ferrous (ferrous metal mines are facilities that extract ferrous metals, such as iron
ore or molybdenum) and nonferrous (Nonferrous metal mines are facilities that extract nonferrous metals, such
as gold, silver, copper, zinc, and lead) metal mines in the United States.
Date of Government Version: 12/05/2005
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/29/2008
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/18/2008
Number of Days to Update: 49
Source: USGS
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 09/02/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/12/2016
Data Release Frequency: Varies
TC4721182.2s Page GR-21
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
US MINES 3: Active Mines & Mineral Plants Database Listing
Active Mines and Mineral Processing Plant operations for commodities monitored by the Minerals Information Team
of the USGS.
Date of Government Version: 04/14/2011
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/08/2011
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/13/2011
Number of Days to Update: 97
Source: USGS
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 09/02/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/12/2016
Data Release Frequency: Varies
FINDS: Facility Index System/Facility Registry System
Facility Index System. FINDS contains both facility information and ’pointers’ to other sources that contain more
detail. EDR includes the following FINDS databases in this report: PCS (Permit Compliance System), AIRS (Aerometric
Information Retrieval System), DOCKET (Enforcement Docket used to manage and track information on civil judicial
enforcement cases for all environmental statutes), FURS (Federal Underground Injection Control), C-DOCKET (Criminal
Docket System used to track criminal enforcement actions for all environmental statutes), FFIS (Federal Facilities
Information System), STATE (State Environmental Laws and Statutes), and PADS (PCB Activity Data System).
Date of Government Version: 07/20/2015
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/09/2015
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/03/2015
Number of Days to Update: 55
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 09/07/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/19/2016
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
DOCKET HWC: Hazardous Waste Compliance Docket Listing
A complete list of the Federal Agency Hazardous Waste Compliance Docket Facilities.
Date of Government Version: 06/02/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/03/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/02/2016
Number of Days to Update: 91
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 08/24/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/12/2016
Data Release Frequency: Varies
UXO: Unexploded Ordnance Sites
A listing of unexploded ordnance site locations
Date of Government Version: 10/25/2015
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/29/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/05/2016
Number of Days to Update: 67
Source: Department of Defense
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/20/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/03/2016
Data Release Frequency: Varies
NC COAL ASH: Coal Ash Disposal Sites
A listing of coal combustion products distribution permits issued by the Division for the treatment, storage,
transportation, use and disposal of coal combustion products.
Date of Government Version: 12/14/2015
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/23/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/18/2016
Number of Days to Update: 85
Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 08/16/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/14/2016
Data Release Frequency: Varies
SC COAL ASH: Coal Ash Disposal Sites
A listing of sites with coal ash ponds.
Date of Government Version: 01/20/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/29/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/01/2016
Number of Days to Update: 63
Source: Department of Health & Environmental Control
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/20/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/03/2016
Data Release Frequency: Varies
TC4721182.2s Page GR-22
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
NC DRYCLEANERS: Drycleaning Sites
Potential and known drycleaning sites, active and abandoned, that the Drycleaning Solvent Cleanup Program has
knowledge of and entered into this database.
Date of Government Version: 06/07/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/22/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/01/2016
Number of Days to Update: 71
Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/22/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/03/2016
Data Release Frequency: Varies
SC DRYCLEANERS: Drycleaner Database
The Drycleaning Facility Restoration Trust Fund database is used to access, prioritze and cleanup contaminated
registered drycleaning sites.
Date of Government Version: 01/01/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/03/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/01/2016
Number of Days to Update: 58
Source: Department of Health & Environmental Control
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 08/05/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/14/2016
Data Release Frequency: Varies
NC Financial Assurance 1: Financial Assurance Information Listing
A listing of financial assurance information for underground storage tank facilities. Financial assurance is intended
to ensure that resources are available to pay for the cost of closure, post-closure care, and corrective measures
if the owner or operator of a regulated facility is unable or unwilling to pay.
Date of Government Version: 05/06/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/12/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/11/2016
Number of Days to Update: 60
Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 08/10/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/21/2016
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
SC Financial Assurance 1: Financial Assurance Information Listing
Financial assurance information for aolid waste facilities. Financial assurance is intended to ensure that resources
are available to pay for the cost of closure, post-closure care, and corrective measures if the owner or operator
of a regulated facility is unable or unwilling to pay.
Date of Government Version: 08/17/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/24/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/01/2016
Number of Days to Update: 8
Source: Department of Health & Environmental Control
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 08/24/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/26/2016
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
NC Financial Assurance 2: Financial Assurance Information Listing
Information for solid waste facilities. Financial assurance is intended to ensure that resources are available
to pay for the cost of closure, post-closure care, and corrective measures if the owner or operator of a regulated
facility is unable or unwilling to pay.
Date of Government Version: 10/02/2012
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/03/2012
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/26/2012
Number of Days to Update: 23
Source: Department of Environmental & Natural Resources
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/24/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/10/2016
Data Release Frequency: Varies
SC Financial Assurance 2: Financial Assurance Information Listing
Hazardous waste financial assurance information.
Date of Government Version: 06/21/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/28/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/01/2016
Number of Days to Update: 65
Source: Department of Health & Environmental Control
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/13/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/26/2016
Data Release Frequency: Varies
TC4721182.2s Page GR-23
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
NC Financial Assurance 3: Financial Assurance Information
Hazardous waste financial assurance information.
Date of Government Version: 09/14/2015
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/15/2015
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/22/2015
Number of Days to Update: 37
Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/13/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/26/2016
Data Release Frequency: Varies
SC Financial Assurance 3: Financial Assurance Information Listing
UST financial assurance information.
Date of Government Version: 03/05/2015
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/06/2015
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/17/2015
Number of Days to Update: 11
Source: Department of Health & Environmental Control
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 08/29/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/12/2016
Data Release Frequency: Varies
SC GWCI: Groundwater Contamination Inventory
An inventory of all groundwater contamination cases in the state.
Date of Government Version: 07/01/2008
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/06/2008
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/19/2008
Number of Days to Update: 13
Source: Department of Health and Environmental Control
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/27/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/10/2016
Data Release Frequency: Annually
NC NPDES: NPDES Facility Location Listing
General information regarding NPDES(National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System) permits.
Date of Government Version: 02/17/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/19/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/03/2016
Number of Days to Update: 74
Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 08/16/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/14/2016
Data Release Frequency: Varies
SC NPDES: Waste Water Treatment Facilities Listing
A listing of waste water treatment facility locations.
Date of Government Version: 08/28/2015
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/03/2015
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/11/2015
Number of Days to Update: 69
Source: Department of Health & Environmental Control
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 08/15/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/12/2016
Data Release Frequency: Varies
NC UIC: Underground Injection Wells Listing
A listing of uncerground injection wells locations.
Date of Government Version: 07/11/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/13/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/01/2016
Number of Days to Update: 50
Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 09/06/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/19/2016
Data Release Frequency: Varies
SC UIC: Underground Injection Wells Listing
A listing of underground injection wells locations.
Date of Government Version: 07/15/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/12/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/01/2016
Number of Days to Update: 20
Source: Department of Health & Environmental Control
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 08/08/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/21/2016
Data Release Frequency: Varies
TC4721182.2s Page GR-24
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
FUELS PROGRAM: EPA Fuels Program Registered Listing
This listing includes facilities that are registered under the Part 80 (Code of Federal Regulations) EPA Fuels
Programs. All companies now are required to submit new and updated registrations.
Date of Government Version: 05/24/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/25/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/13/2016
Number of Days to Update: 49
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 08/23/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/05/2016
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
ECHO: Enforcement & Compliance History Information
ECHO provides integrated compliance and enforcement information for about 800,000 regulated facilities nationwide.
Date of Government Version: 09/20/2015
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/23/2015
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/04/2016
Number of Days to Update: 103
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 06/22/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/03/2016
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS
EDR Exclusive Records
EDR MGP: EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plants
The EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plant Database includes records of coal gas plants (manufactured gas plants)
compiled by EDR’s researchers. Manufactured gas sites were used in the United States from the 1800’s to 1950’s
to produce a gas that could be distributed and used as fuel. These plants used whale oil, rosin, coal, or a mixture
of coal, oil, and water that also produced a significant amount of waste. Many of the byproducts of the gas production,
such as coal tar (oily waste containing volatile and non-volatile chemicals), sludges, oils and other compounds
are potentially hazardous to human health and the environment. The byproduct from this process was frequently
disposed of directly at the plant site and can remain or spread slowly, serving as a continuous source of soil
and groundwater contamination.
Date of Government Version: N/A
Date Data Arrived at EDR: N/A
Date Made Active in Reports: N/A
Number of Days to Update: N/A
Source: EDR, Inc.
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: N/A
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
EDR Hist Auto: EDR Exclusive Historic Gas Stations
EDR has searched selected national collections of business directories and has collected listings of potential
gas station/filling station/service station sites that were available to EDR researchers. EDR’s review was limited
to those categories of sources that might, in EDR’s opinion, include gas station/filling station/service station
establishments. The categories reviewed included, but were not limited to gas, gas station, gasoline station,
filling station, auto, automobile repair, auto service station, service station, etc. This database falls within
a category of information EDR classifies as "High Risk Historical Records", or HRHR. EDR’s HRHR effort presents
unique and sometimes proprietary data about past sites and operations that typically create environmental concerns,
but may not show up in current government records searches.
Date of Government Version: N/A
Date Data Arrived at EDR: N/A
Date Made Active in Reports: N/A
Number of Days to Update: N/A
Source: EDR, Inc.
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: N/A
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: Varies
EDR Hist Cleaner: EDR Exclusive Historic Dry Cleaners
EDR has searched selected national collections of business directories and has collected listings of potential
dry cleaner sites that were available to EDR researchers. EDR’s review was limited to those categories of sources
that might, in EDR’s opinion, include dry cleaning establishments. The categories reviewed included, but were
not limited to dry cleaners, cleaners, laundry, laundromat, cleaning/laundry, wash & dry etc. This database falls
within a category of information EDR classifies as "High Risk Historical Records", or HRHR. EDR’s HRHR effort
presents unique and sometimes proprietary data about past sites and operations that typically create environmental
concerns, but may not show up in current government records searches.
TC4721182.2s Page GR-25
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version: N/A
Date Data Arrived at EDR: N/A
Date Made Active in Reports: N/A
Number of Days to Update: N/A
Source: EDR, Inc.
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: N/A
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: Varies
EDR RECOVERED GOVERNMENT ARCHIVES
Exclusive Recovered Govt. Archives
NC RGA HWS: Recovered Government Archive State Hazardous Waste Facilities List
The EDR Recovered Government Archive State Hazardous Waste database provides a list of SHWS incidents derived
from historical databases and includes many records that no longer appear in current government lists. Compiled
from Records formerly available from the Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources in North Carolina.
Date of Government Version: N/A
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/01/2013
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/24/2013
Number of Days to Update: 176
Source: Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 06/01/2012
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: Varies
SC RGA HWS: Recovered Government Archive State Hazardous Waste Facilities List
The EDR Recovered Government Archive State Hazardous Waste database provides a list of SHWS incidents derived
from historical databases and includes many records that no longer appear in current government lists. Compiled
from Records formerly available from the Department of Health and Environmental Control in South Carolina.
Date of Government Version: N/A
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/01/2013
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/03/2014
Number of Days to Update: 186
Source: Department of Health and Environmental Control
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 06/01/2012
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: Varies
NC RGA LF: Recovered Government Archive Solid Waste Facilities List
The EDR Recovered Government Archive Landfill database provides a list of landfills derived from historical databases
and includes many records that no longer appear in current government lists. Compiled from Records formerly available
from the Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources in North Carolina.
Date of Government Version: N/A
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/01/2013
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/13/2014
Number of Days to Update: 196
Source: Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 06/01/2012
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: Varies
SC RGA LF: Recovered Government Archive Solid Waste Facilities List
The EDR Recovered Government Archive Landfill database provides a list of landfills derived from historical databases
and includes many records that no longer appear in current government lists. Compiled from Records formerly available
from the Department of Health and Environmental Control in South Carolina.
Date of Government Version: N/A
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/01/2013
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/15/2014
Number of Days to Update: 198
Source: Department of Health and Environmental Control
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 06/01/2012
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: Varies
NC RGA LUST: Recovered Government Archive Leaking Underground Storage Tank
The EDR Recovered Government Archive Leaking Underground Storage Tank database provides a list of LUST incidents
derived from historical databases and includes many records that no longer appear in current government lists.
Compiled from Records formerly available from the Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources in North
Carolina.
TC4721182.2s Page GR-26
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Date of Government Version: N/A
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/01/2013
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/20/2013
Number of Days to Update: 172
Source: Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 06/01/2012
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: Varies
SC RGA LUST: Recovered Government Archive Leaking Underground Storage Tank
The EDR Recovered Government Archive Leaking Underground Storage Tank database provides a list of LUST incidents
derived from historical databases and includes many records that no longer appear in current government lists.
Compiled from Records formerly available from the Department of Health and Environmental Control in South Carolina.
Date of Government Version: N/A
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/01/2013
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/03/2014
Number of Days to Update: 186
Source: Department of Health and Environmental Control
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 06/01/2012
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: Varies
OTHER DATABASE(S)
Depending on the geographic area covered by this report, the data provided in these specialty databases may or may not be
complete. For example, the existence of wetlands information data in a specific report does not mean that all wetlands in the
area covered by the report are included. Moreover, the absence of any reported wetlands information does not necessarily
mean that wetlands do not exist in the area covered by the report.
CT MANIFEST: Hazardous Waste Manifest Data
Facility and manifest data. Manifest is a document that lists and tracks hazardous waste from the generator through
transporters to a tsd facility.
Date of Government Version: 07/30/2013
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/19/2013
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/03/2013
Number of Days to Update: 45
Source: Department of Energy & Environmental Protection
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 08/10/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/28/2016
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
NJ MANIFEST: Manifest Information
Hazardous waste manifest information.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2013
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/17/2015
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/12/2015
Number of Days to Update: 26
Source: Department of Environmental Protection
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 07/11/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/24/2016
Data Release Frequency: Annually
NY MANIFEST: Facility and Manifest Data
Manifest is a document that lists and tracks hazardous waste from the generator through transporters to a TSD
facility.
Date of Government Version: 05/01/2016
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/06/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/17/2016
Number of Days to Update: 42
Source: Department of Environmental Conservation
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 08/03/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/14/2016
Data Release Frequency: Annually
PA MANIFEST: Manifest Information
Hazardous waste manifest information.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2014
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/24/2015
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/18/2015
Number of Days to Update: 25
Source: Department of Environmental Protection
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 07/18/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/31/2016
Data Release Frequency: Annually
TC4721182.2s Page GR-27
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
RI MANIFEST: Manifest information
Hazardous waste manifest information
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2013
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/19/2015
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/15/2015
Number of Days to Update: 26
Source: Department of Environmental Management
Telephone: [phone]
Last EDR Contact: 08/22/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/05/2016
Data Release Frequency: Annually
WI MANIFEST: Manifest Information
Hazardous waste manifest information.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2015
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/14/2016
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/03/2016
Number of Days to Update: 50
Source: Department of Natural Resources
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 06/13/2016
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/26/2016
Data Release Frequency: Annually
Oil/Gas Pipelines
Source: PennWell Corporation
Petroleum Bundle (Crude Oil, Refined Products, Petrochemicals, Gas Liquids (LPG/NGL), and Specialty
Gases (Miscellaneous)) N = Natural Gas Bundle (Natural Gas, Gas Liquids (LPG/NGL), and Specialty Gases
(Miscellaneous)). This map includes information copyrighted by PennWell Corporation. This information
is provided on a best effort basis and PennWell Corporation does not guarantee its accuracy nor warrant
its fitness for any particular purpose. Such information has been reprinted with the permission of PennWell.
Electric Power Transmission Line Data
Source: PennWell Corporation
This map includes information copyrighted by PennWell Corporation. This information is provided on a best
effort basis and PennWell Corporation does not guarantee its accuracy nor warrant its fitness for any
particular purpose. Such information has been reprinted with the permission of PennWell.
Sensitive Receptors: There are individuals deemed sensitive receptors due to their fragile immune systems and special sensitivity
to environmental discharges. These sensitive receptors typically include the elderly, the sick, and children. While the location of all
sensitive receptors cannot be determined, EDR indicates those buildings and facilities - schools, daycares, hospitals, medical centers,
and nursing homes - where individuals who are sensitive receptors are likely to be located.
AHA Hospitals:
Source: American Hospital Association, Inc.
Telephone: [phone]
The database includes a listing of hospitals based on the American Hospital Association’s annual survey of hospitals.
Medical Centers: Provider of Services Listing
Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
Telephone: [phone]
A listing of hospitals with Medicare provider number, produced by Centers of Medicare & Medicaid Services,
a federal agency within the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
Nursing Homes
Source: National Institutes of Health
Telephone: [phone]
Information on Medicare and Medicaid certified nursing homes in the United States.
Public Schools
Source: National Center for Education Statistics
Telephone: [phone]
The National Center for Education Statistics’ primary database on elementary
and secondary public education in the United States. It is a comprehensive, annual, national statistical
database of all public elementary and secondary schools and school districts, which contains data that are
comparable across all states.
Private Schools
Source: National Center for Education Statistics
Telephone: [phone]
The National Center for Education Statistics’ primary database on private school locations in the United States.
TC4721182.2s Page GR-28
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
Daycare Centers: Child Care Facility List
Source: Department of Health & Human Services
Telephone: [phone]
Flood Zone Data: This data, available in select counties across the country, was obtained by EDR in 2003 & 2011 from the Federal
Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). Data depicts 100-year and 500-year flood zones as defined by FEMA.
NWI: National Wetlands Inventory. This data, available in select counties across the country, was obtained by EDR
in 2002, 2005 and 2010 from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
State Wetlands Data: Wetland Inventory
Source: US Fish & Wildlife Service
Telephone: [phone]
Current USGS 7.5 Minute Topographic Map
Source: U.S. Geological Survey
STREET AND ADDRESS INFORMATION
© 2015 TomTom North America, Inc. All rights reserved. This material is proprietary and the subject of copyright protection
and other intellectual property rights owned by or licensed to Tele Atlas North America, Inc. The use of this material is subject
to the terms of a license agreement. You will be held liable for any unauthorized copying or disclosure of this material.
TC4721182.2s Page GR-29
GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING
TC4721182.2s Page A-1
geologic strata.
of the soil, and nearby wells. Groundwater flow velocity is generally impacted by the nature of the
Groundwater flow direction may be impacted by surface topography, hydrology, hydrogeology, characteristics
2. Groundwater flow velocity.
1. Groundwater flow direction, and
Assessment of the impact of contaminant migration generally has two principal investigative components:
forming an opinion about the impact of potential contaminant migration.
EDR’s GeoCheck Physical Setting Source Addendum is provided to assist the environmental professional in
2014Version Date:
6060301 FORT MILL, SCEast Map:
2014Version Date:
6061844 LAKE WYLIE, SCTarget Property Map:
USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP
734 ft. above sea levelElevation:
3880736.8UTM Y (Meters):
499139.5UTM X (Meters):
Zone 17Universal Tranverse Mercator:
81.009438 - 81˚ 0’ 33.98’’Longitude (West):
35.07116 - 35˚ 4’ 16.18’’Latitude (North):
TARGET PROPERTY COORDINATES
CHARLOTTE, NC 28278
14816 THOMAS ROAD
THOMAS ROAD SITE
TARGET PROPERTY ADDRESS
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE ADDENDUM®
TC4721182.2s Page A-2
should be field verified.
on a relative (not an absolute) basis. Relative elevation information between sites of close proximity
Source: Topography has been determined from the USGS 7.5’ Digital Elevation Model and should be evaluated
SURROUNDING TOPOGRAPHY: ELEVATION PROFILES
Elevation (ft)Elevation (ft)TP
TP
0 1/2 1 Miles✩Target Property Elevation: 734 ft.
North South
West East699690639661691706703740738734723764741737705713700699724713727750757728736728733691734747800766752737719734744716General WSWGeneral Topographic Gradient:
TARGET PROPERTY TOPOGRAPHY
should contamination exist on the target property, what downgradient sites might be impacted.
assist the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or,
Surface topography may be indicative of the direction of surficial groundwater flow. This information can be used to
TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION
collected on nearby properties, and regional groundwater flow information (from deep aquifers).
sources of information, such as surface topographic information, hydrologic information, hydrogeologic data
using site-specific well data. If such data is not reasonably ascertainable, it may be necessary to rely on other
Groundwater flow direction for a particular site is best determined by a qualified environmental professional
GROUNDWATER FLOW DIRECTION INFORMATION
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY®
TC4721182.2s Page A-3
Not Reported
GENERAL DIRECTIONLOCATION
GROUNDWATER FLOWFROM TPMAP ID
hydrogeologically, and the depth to water table.
authorities at select sites and has extracted the date of the report, groundwater flow direction as determined
flow at specific points. EDR has reviewed reports submitted by environmental professionals to regulatory
EDR has developed the AQUIFLOW Information System to provide data on the general direction of groundwater
AQUIFLOW®
Search Radius: 1.000 Mile.
contamination exist on the target property, what downgradient sites might be impacted.
environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or, should
of groundwater flow direction in the immediate area. Such hydrogeologic information can be used to assist the
Hydrogeologic information obtained by installation of wells on a specific site can often be an indicator
HYDROGEOLOGIC INFORMATION
YES - refer to the Overview Map and Detail MapLAKE WYLIE
NATIONAL WETLAND INVENTORY
NWI Electronic
Data CoverageNWI Quad at Target Property
45091C - FEMA DFIRM Flood dataAdditional Panels in search area:
37119C - FEMA DFIRM Flood dataFlood Plain Panel at Target Property:
YES - refer to the Overview Map and Detail MapMECKLENBURG, NC
FEMA FLOOD ZONE
FEMA Flood
Electronic DataTarget Property County
and bodies of water).
Refer to the Physical Setting Source Map following this summary for hydrologic information (major waterways
contamination exist on the target property, what downgradient sites might be impacted.
the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or, should
Surface water can act as a hydrologic barrier to groundwater flow. Such hydrologic information can be used to assist
HYDROLOGIC INFORMATION
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY®
TC4721182.2s Page A-4
Map, USGS Digital Data Series DDS - 11 (1994).
of the Conterminous U.S. at 1:2,500,000 Scale - a digital representation of the 1974 P.B. King and H.M. Beikman
Geologic Age and Rock Stratigraphic Unit Source: P.G. Schruben, R.E. Arndt and W.J. Bawiec, Geology
ROCK STRATIGRAPHIC UNIT GEOLOGIC AGE IDENTIFICATION
Plutonic and Intrusive RocksCategory:PaleozoicEra:
MississippianSystem:
Paleozoic mafic intrusivesSeries:
PzmiCode: (decoded above as Era, System & Series)
at which contaminant migration may be occurring.
Geologic information can be used by the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the relative speed
GEOLOGIC INFORMATION IN GENERAL AREA OF TARGET PROPERTY
move more quickly through sandy-gravelly types of soils than silty-clayey types of soils.
characteristics data collected on nearby properties and regional soil information. In general, contaminant plumes
to rely on other sources of information, including geologic age identification, rock stratigraphic unit and soil
using site specific geologic and soil strata data. If such data are not reasonably ascertainable, it may be necessary
Groundwater flow velocity information for a particular site is best determined by a qualified environmental professional
GROUNDWATER FLOW VELOCITY INFORMATION
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY®
EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.
4
2
5
4
5
5
1
4
3
6
0 1/16 1/8 1/4 Miles
TC4721182.2s Page A-6
Min: 4.5
Max: 5.5
Min: 4
Max: 14
50%), Lean Clay
limit less than
Clays (liquid
SOILS, Silts and
FINE-GRAINED
Soils.
200), Clayey
passing No.
than 35 pct.
Materials (more
Silt-Claysandy clay loam53 inches48 inches 3
Min: 4.5
Max: 5.5
Min: 4
Max: 14
50%), silt.
limit less than
Clays (liquid
SOILS, Silts and
FINE-GRAINED
Soils.
200), Clayey
passing No.
than 35 pct.
Materials (more
Silt-Clayclay48 inches 9 inches 2
Min: 4.5
Max: 5.5
Min: 14
Max: 42
Silty Sand.
Sands with fines,
SOILS, Sands,
COARSE-GRAINED
and Sand.
Clayey Gravel
200), Silty, or
passing No.
pct. or less
materials (35
Granularsandy loam 9 inches 0 inches 1
Soil Layer Information
Boundary Classification Saturated
hydraulic
conductivity
micro m/sec
Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil Soil Reaction
(pH)

> 0 inchesDepth to Watertable Min:
> 0 inchesDepth to Bedrock Min:
ModerateCorrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel:
Hydric Status: Not hydric
Well drainedSoil Drainage Class:
textures.
moderately well and well drained soils with moderately coarse
Class B - Moderate infiltration rates. Deep and moderately deep,Hydrologic Group:
sandy loamSoil Surface Texture:
ApplingSoil Component Name:
Soil Map ID: 1
in a landscape. The following information is based on Soil Conservation Service SSURGO data.
for privately owned lands in the United States. A soil map in a soil survey is a representation of soil patterns
Survey (NCSS) and is responsible for collecting, storing, maintaining and distributing soil survey information
The U.S. Department of Agriculture’s (USDA) Soil Conservation Service (SCS) leads the National Cooperative Soil
DOMINANT SOIL COMPOSITION IN GENERAL AREA OF TARGET PROPERTY
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY®
TC4721182.2s Page A-7
Min: 4.5
Max: 6.5
Min: 14
Max: 42
Silty Sand.
Sands with fines,
SOILS, Sands,
COARSE-GRAINED
Clayey sand.
Sands with fines,
SOILS, Sands,
COARSE-GRAINED
and Sand.
Clayey Gravel
200), Silty, or
passing No.
pct. or less
materials (35
Granularsandy loam 7 inches 0 inches 1
Soil Layer Information
Boundary Classification Saturated
hydraulic
conductivity
micro m/sec
Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil Soil Reaction
(pH)

> 0 inchesDepth to Watertable Min:
> 0 inchesDepth to Bedrock Min:
HighCorrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel:
Hydric Status: Not hydric
Well drainedSoil Drainage Class:
textures.
moderately well and well drained soils with moderately coarse
Class B - Moderate infiltration rates. Deep and moderately deep,Hydrologic Group:
sandy loamSoil Surface Texture:
PacoletSoil Component Name:
Soil Map ID: 2
Min: 4.5
Max: 5.5
Min: 4
Max: 14
Silty Sand.
Sands with fines,
SOILS, Sands,
COARSE-GRAINED
Clayey sand.
Sands with fines,
SOILS, Sands,
COARSE-GRAINED
Soils.
200), Silty
passing No.
than 35 pct.
Materials (more
Silt-Claysandy clay loam66 inches53 inches 4
Soil Layer Information
Boundary Classification Saturated
hydraulic
conductivity
micro m/sec
Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil Soil Reaction
(pH)
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY®
TC4721182.2s Page A-8

> 0 inchesDepth to Watertable Min:
> 0 inchesDepth to Bedrock Min:
ModerateCorrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel:
Hydric Status: Not hydric
Well drainedSoil Drainage Class:
textures.
moderately well and well drained soils with moderately coarse
Class B - Moderate infiltration rates. Deep and moderately deep,Hydrologic Group:
sandy loamSoil Surface Texture:
ApplingSoil Component Name:
Soil Map ID: 3
4.5
Max: 6 Min:
Min: 4
Max: 14
Silty Sand.
Sands with fines,
SOILS, Sands,
COARSE-GRAINED
Clayey sand.
Sands with fines,
SOILS, Sands,
COARSE-GRAINED
Soils.
200), Silty
passing No.
than 35 pct.
Materials (more
Silt-Claysandy loam59 inches38 inches 4
4.5
Max: 6 Min:
Min: 4
Max: 14
Clayey sand.
Sands with fines,
SOILS, Sands,
COARSE-GRAINED
Soils.
200), Silty
passing No.
than 35 pct.
Materials (more
Silt-Claysandy clay loam38 inches29 inches 3
4.5
Max: 6 Min:
Min: 4
Max: 14
50%), silt.
limit less than
Clays (liquid
SOILS, Silts and
FINE-GRAINED
Soils.
200), Clayey
passing No.
than 35 pct.
Materials (more
Silt-Clayclay29 inches 7 inches 2
Soil Layer Information
Boundary Classification Saturated
hydraulic
conductivity
micro m/sec
Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil Soil Reaction
(pH)
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY®
TC4721182.2s Page A-9

> 0 inchesDepth to Watertable Min:
> 0 inchesDepth to Bedrock Min:
HighCorrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel:
Hydric Status: Not hydric
Well drainedSoil Drainage Class:
textures.
moderately well and well drained soils with moderately coarse
Class B - Moderate infiltration rates. Deep and moderately deep,Hydrologic Group:
sandy clay loamSoil Surface Texture:
CecilSoil Component Name:
Soil Map ID: 4
Min: 4.5
Max: 5.5
Min: 4
Max: 14
Silty Sand.
Sands with fines,
SOILS, Sands,
COARSE-GRAINED
Clayey sand.
Sands with fines,
SOILS, Sands,
COARSE-GRAINED
Soils.
200), Silty
passing No.
than 35 pct.
Materials (more
Silt-Claysandy clay loam66 inches53 inches 4
Min: 4.5
Max: 5.5
Min: 4
Max: 14
50%), Lean Clay
limit less than
Clays (liquid
SOILS, Silts and
FINE-GRAINED
Soils.
200), Clayey
passing No.
than 35 pct.
Materials (more
Silt-Claysandy clay loam53 inches48 inches 3
Min: 4.5
Max: 5.5
Min: 4
Max: 14
50%), silt.
limit less than
Clays (liquid
SOILS, Silts and
FINE-GRAINED
Soils.
200), Clayey
passing No.
than 35 pct.
Materials (more
Silt-Clayclay48 inches 9 inches 2
Min: 4.5
Max: 5.5
Min: 14
Max: 42
Silty Sand.
Sands with fines,
SOILS, Sands,
COARSE-GRAINED
and Sand.
Clayey Gravel
200), Silty, or
passing No.
pct. or less
materials (35
Granularsandy loam 9 inches 0 inches 1
Soil Layer Information
Boundary Classification Saturated
hydraulic
conductivity
micro m/sec
Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil Soil Reaction
(pH)
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY®
TC4721182.2s Page A-10

> 0 inchesDepth to Watertable Min:
> 0 inchesDepth to Bedrock Min:
HighCorrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel:
Hydric Status: Not hydric
Well drainedSoil Drainage Class:
textures.
moderately well and well drained soils with moderately coarse
Class B - Moderate infiltration rates. Deep and moderately deep,Hydrologic Group:
sandy clay loamSoil Surface Texture:
CecilSoil Component Name:
Soil Map ID: 5
4.5
Max: 6 Min:
Min: 4
Max: 14
Silty Sand.
Sands with fines,
SOILS, Sands,
COARSE-GRAINED
Clayey sand.
Sands with fines,
SOILS, Sands,
COARSE-GRAINED
Soils.
200), Silty
passing No.
than 35 pct.
Materials (more
Silt-Clayloam61 inches48 inches 3
Min: 4.5
Max: 5.5
Min: 4
Max: 14
50%), silt.
limit less than
Clays (liquid
SOILS, Silts and
FINE-GRAINED
Soils.
200), Clayey
passing No.
than 35 pct.
Materials (more
Silt-Clayclay48 inches 5 inches 2
Min: 4.5
Max: 6.5
Min: 4
Max: 14
50%), silt.
limit less than
Clays (liquid
SOILS, Silts and
FINE-GRAINED
Soils.
200), Silty
passing No.
than 35 pct.
Materials (more
Silt-Claysandy clay loam 5 inches 0 inches 1
Soil Layer Information
Boundary Classification Saturated
hydraulic
conductivity
micro m/sec
Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil Soil Reaction
(pH)
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY®
TC4721182.2s Page A-11

> 38 inchesDepth to Watertable Min:
> 0 inchesDepth to Bedrock Min:
ModerateCorrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel:
Hydric Status: Partially hydric
Somewhat poorly drainedSoil Drainage Class:
movement of water, or soils with moderately fine or fine textures.
Class C - Slow infiltration rates. Soils with layers impeding downwardHydrologic Group:
loamSoil Surface Texture:
MonacanSoil Component Name:
Soil Map ID: 6
4.5
Max: 6 Min:
Min: 4
Max: 14
Silty Sand.
Sands with fines,
SOILS, Sands,
COARSE-GRAINED
Clayey sand.
Sands with fines,
SOILS, Sands,
COARSE-GRAINED
Soils.
200), Silty
passing No.
than 35 pct.
Materials (more
Silt-Clayloam61 inches48 inches 3
Min: 4.5
Max: 5.5
Min: 4
Max: 14
50%), silt.
limit less than
Clays (liquid
SOILS, Silts and
FINE-GRAINED
Soils.
200), Clayey
passing No.
than 35 pct.
Materials (more
Silt-Clayclay48 inches 5 inches 2
Min: 4.5
Max: 6.5
Min: 4
Max: 14
50%), silt.
limit less than
Clays (liquid
SOILS, Silts and
FINE-GRAINED
Soils.
200), Silty
passing No.
than 35 pct.
Materials (more
Silt-Claysandy clay loam 5 inches 0 inches 1
Soil Layer Information
Boundary Classification Saturated
hydraulic
conductivity
micro m/sec
Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil Soil Reaction
(pH)
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY®
TC4721182.2s Page A-12
No Wells Found
FEDERAL USGS WELL INFORMATION
LOCATION
FROM TPWELL IDMAP ID
1.000State Database
Nearest PWS within 0.001 milesFederal FRDS PWS
1.000Federal USGS
WELL SEARCH DISTANCE INFORMATION
SEARCH DISTANCE (miles)DATABASE
opinion about the impact of contaminant migration on nearby drinking water wells.
professional in assessing sources that may impact ground water flow direction, and in forming an
EDR Local/Regional Water Agency records provide water well information to assist the environmental
LOCAL / REGIONAL WATER AGENCY RECORDS
Min: 5.1
Max: 7.3
Min: 4
Max: 14
50%), Lean Clay
limit less than
Clays (liquid
SOILS, Silts and
FINE-GRAINED
Soils.
200), Clayey
passing No.
than 35 pct.
Materials (more
Silt-Claysandy clay loam64 inches25 inches 4
Min: 5.1
Max: 7.3
Min: 0.42
Max: 141
Clayey sand.
Sands with fines,
SOILS, Sands,
COARSE-GRAINED
Soils.
200), Silty
passing No.
than 35 pct.
Materials (more
Silt-Clay
to clay
stratified sand79 inches64 inches 3
Min: 5.1
Max: 7.3
Min: 4
Max: 14
50%), Lean Clay
limit less than
Clays (liquid
SOILS, Silts and
FINE-GRAINED
Soils.
200), Clayey
passing No.
than 35 pct.
Materials (more
Silt-Claysilty clay loam25 inches14 inches 2
Min: 5.1
Max: 7.3
Min: 4
Max: 14
50%), silt.
limit less than
Clays (liquid
SOILS, Silts and
FINE-GRAINED
Soils.
200), Silty
passing No.
than 35 pct.
Materials (more
Silt-Clayloam14 inches 0 inches 1
Soil Layer Information
Boundary Classification Saturated
hydraulic
conductivity
micro m/sec
Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil Soil Reaction
(pH)
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY®
TC4721182.2s Page A-13
1/2 - 1 Mile NNENC2000000001683 1
STATE DATABASE WELL INFORMATION
LOCATION
FROM TPWELL IDMAP ID
Note: PWS System location is not always the same as well location.
No PWS System Found
FEDERAL FRDS PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM INFORMATION
LOCATION
FROM TPWELL IDMAP ID
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY®
EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.66 80
720680
6 40
6 40
6806 40 720
720720
7 2 0 7607607 20
760
680600640 72076076
0600760640680
640 7 60
7207206 00
7 20 6807 60
680
72 0 720720
7207 60
6807 20
7 60760
760
720 72076 0
7
60
7200 7207
60760 8 007
60720 760680 760
680760
7 60
760
680720680 720680
68072 0 720720
720
7
20
720
720720720
0
7 20 72072 07207 2 0
7 2 0
7 20
720
640
7 20
680 6 80720
68 0
680640 680
720640
647 20640 6 4 0 680
680720
680
680
6806407 20720
680 680
680680 7207 2 0
640 680 720
720720 640
680 6800680
6 80680680680680
6806806806806 8 0
6 8068 06
8068 0 680
6 8 0
6 80680680
6 8 0
680
680
680
680
68 0
640
64 06 40
640
6 4 0
64 0
640 6406 40
6406 4
600
600
600 0680680
720
7207207 207 2 0
7 2 0
7 20
7
2
0720 7
20720 7207 20
7 20 720
7 20720 7 20
6640
6 8 0
680680
7207 20
7 206 80720 720
72 0
7 2 0 720720720
72 0
6 80720
720
7 2 0 7207 2 0720720720720
720680
680720
6680680
680
6 8 0680
NC
TC4721182.2s Page A-15
NC2000000001683Site id:
O’ZION AME ZION CHURCHOwner name:
Not ReportedWell dep 1:
0Well depth:
AAvailavili:
-81.003872Longitude :
35.0833Latitude m:
S01Facility a:
WELL #1Facility n:
GWWater type:
GWPrimary so:
CHARLOTTECity:
MECKLENBURGCounty:
NCPws type:
O‘ZION AME ZION CHURCHSystem nam:
NC0160897Pwsidentif:
1
NNE
1/2 - 1 Mile
Higher
NC2000000001683NC WELLS
Map ID
Direction
Distance
Elevation EDR ID NumberDatabase
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS®
TC4721182.2s Page A-16
0%0%100%1.278 pCi/LBasement
0%0%100%0.900 pCi/LLiving Area - 2nd Floor
0%0%100%0.569 pCi/LLiving Area - 1st Floor
% >20 pCi/L% 4-20 pCi/L% <4 pCi/LAverage ActivityArea
Number of sites tested: 46
Federal Area Radon Information for MECKLENBURG COUNTY, NC
: Zone 3 indoor average level < 2 pCi/L.
: Zone 2 indoor average level >= 2 pCi/L and <= 4 pCi/L.
Note: Zone 1 indoor average level > 4 pCi/L.
Federal EPA Radon Zone for MECKLENBURG County: 3
6.86.86.801
__________________________________
Max pCi/LMin pCi/LAvg pCi/LNum Results
Radon Test Results
State Database: NC Radon
AREA RADON INFORMATION
®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS
RADON
®
TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION
USGS 7.5’ Digital Elevation Model (DEM)
Source: United States Geologic Survey
EDR acquired the USGS 7.5’ Digital Elevation Model in 2002 and updated it in 2006. The 7.5 minute DEM corresponds
to the USGS 1:24,000- and 1:25,000-scale topographic quadrangle maps. The DEM provides elevation data
with consistent elevation units and projection.
Current USGS 7.5 Minute Topographic Map
Source: U.S. Geological Survey
HYDROLOGIC INFORMATION
Flood Zone Data: This data, available in select counties across the country, was obtained by EDR in 2003 & 2011 from the Federal
Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). Data depicts 100-year and 500-year flood zones as defined by FEMA.
NWI: National Wetlands Inventory. This data, available in select counties across the country, was obtained by EDR
in 2002, 2005 and 2010 from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
State Wetlands Data: Wetland Inventory
Source: US Fish & Wildlife Service
Telephone: [phone]
HYDROGEOLOGIC INFORMATION
AQUIFLOW Information SystemR
Source: EDR proprietary database of groundwater flow information
EDR has developed the AQUIFLOW Information System (AIS) to provide data on the general direction of groundwater
flow at specific points. EDR has reviewed reports submitted to regulatory authorities at select sites and has
extracted the date of the report, hydrogeologically determined groundwater flow direction and depth to water table
information.
GEOLOGIC INFORMATION
Geologic Age and Rock Stratigraphic Unit
Source: P.G. Schruben, R.E. Arndt and W.J. Bawiec, Geology of the Conterminous U.S. at 1:2,500,000 Scale - A digital
representation of the 1974 P.B. King and H.M. Beikman Map, USGS Digital Data Series DDS - 11 (1994).
STATSGO: State Soil Geographic Database
Source: Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS)
The U.S. Department of Agriculture’s (USDA) Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) leads the national
Conservation Soil Survey (NCSS) and is responsible for collecting, storing, maintaining and distributing soil
survey information for privately owned lands in the United States. A soil map in a soil survey is a representation
of soil patterns in a landscape. Soil maps for STATSGO are compiled by generalizing more detailed (SSURGO)
soil survey maps.
SSURGO: Soil Survey Geographic Database
Source: Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS)
Telephone: [phone]
SSURGO is the most detailed level of mapping done by the Natural Resources Conservation Service, mapping
scales generally range from 1:12,000 to 1:63,360. Field mapping methods using national standards are used to
construct the soil maps in the Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) database. SSURGO digitizing duplicates the
original soil survey maps. This level of mapping is designed for use by landowners, townships and county
natural resource planning and management.
TC4721182.2s Page PSGR-1
PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE RECORDS SEARCHED
LOCAL / REGIONAL WATER AGENCY RECORDS
FEDERAL WATER WELLS
PWS: Public Water Systems
Source: EPA/Office of Drinking Water
Telephone: [phone]
Public Water System data from the Federal Reporting Data System. A PWS is any water system which provides water to at
least 25 people for at least 60 days annually. PWSs provide water from wells, rivers and other sources.
PWS ENF: Public Water Systems Violation and Enforcement Data
Source: EPA/Office of Drinking Water
Telephone: [phone]
Violation and Enforcement data for Public Water Systems from the Safe Drinking Water Information System (SDWIS) after
August 1995. Prior to August 1995, the data came from the Federal Reporting Data System (FRDS).
USGS Water Wells: USGS National Water Inventory System (NWIS)
This database contains descriptive information on sites where the USGS collects or has collected data on surface
water and/or groundwater. The groundwater data includes information on wells, springs, and other sources of groundwater.
STATE RECORDS
North Carolina Public Water Supply Wells
Source: Department of Environmental Health
Telephone: [phone]
OTHER STATE DATABASE INFORMATION
NC Natural Areas: Significant Natural Heritage Areas
Source: Center for Geographic Information and Analysis
Telephone: [phone]
A polygon converage identifying sites (terrestrial or aquatic that have particular biodiversity significance.
A site’s significance may be due to the presenceof rare species, rare or hight quality natural communities, or
other important ecological features.
NC Game Lands: Wildlife Resources Commission Game Lands
Source: Center for Geographic Information and Analysis
Telephone: [phone]
All publicly owned game lands managed by the North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission and as listed in Hunting
and Fishing Maps.
NC Natural Heritage Sites: Natural Heritage Element Occurrence Sites
Source: Center for Geographic Information and Analysis
Telephone: [phone]
A point coverage identifying locations of rare and endangered species, occurrences of exemplary or unique natural
ecosystems (terrestrial or aquatic), and special animal habitats (e.g., colonial waterbird nesting sites).
RADON
State Database: NC Radon
Source: Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Telephone: [phone]
Radon Statistical and Non Statiscal Data
Area Radon Information
Source: USGS
Telephone: [phone]
The National Radon Database has been developed by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
(USEPA) and is a compilation of the EPA/State Residential Radon Survey and the National Residential Radon Survey.
The study covers the years 1986 - 1992. Where necessary data has been supplemented by information collected at
private sources such as universities and research institutions.
TC4721182.2s Page PSGR-2
PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE RECORDS SEARCHED
EPA Radon Zones
Source: EPA
Telephone: [phone]
Sections 307 & 309 of IRAA directed EPA to list and identify areas of U.S. with the potential for elevated indoor
radon levels.
OTHER
Airport Landing Facilities: Private and public use landing facilities
Source: Federal Aviation Administration, 800-457-6656
Epicenters: World earthquake epicenters, Richter 5 or greater
Source: Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Earthquake Fault Lines: The fault lines displayed on EDR’s Topographic map are digitized quaternary faultlines, prepared
in 1975 by the United State Geological Survey
STREET AND ADDRESS INFORMATION
© 2015 TomTom North America, Inc. All rights reserved. This material is proprietary and the subject of copyright protection
and other intellectual property rights owned by or licensed to Tele Atlas North America, Inc. The use of this material is subject
to the terms of a license agreement. You will be held liable for any unauthorized copying or disclosure of this material.
TC4721182.2s Page PSGR-3
PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE RECORDS SEARCHED
PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT
Thomas Road Site
14816 Thomas Road
Charlotte, North Carolina 28278

Project No. 199HOP1610 ATC Group Services LLC
APPENDIX F

AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHS
The EDR Aerial Photo Decade Package
Inquiry Number:
6 Armstrong Road, 4th floor
Shelton, CT 06484
Toll Free: 800.352.0050 www.edrnet.com
Thomas Road Site
14816 Thomas Road
Charlotte, NC 28278
September 08, 2016
4721182.9
Contact:EDR Inquiry #
Search Results:
Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice
EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other trademarks used herein are
the property of their respective owners.
page-
Environmental Data Resources, Inc. (EDR) Aerial Photo Decade Package is a screening tool designed to assist
environmental professionals in evaluating potential liability on a target property resulting from past activities. EDR’s
professional researchers provide digitally reproduced historical aerial photographs, and when available, provide one photo
per decade.
When delivered electronically by EDR, the aerial photo images included with this report are for ONE TIME USE
ONLY. Further reproduction of these aerial photo images is prohibited without permission from EDR. For more
information contact your EDR Account Executive.
Year Details SourceScale
EDR Aerial Photo Decade Package
Site Name: Client Name:
2012 1"=500'Flight Year: 2012 USDA/NAIP
2011 1"=500'Flight Year: 2011 USDA/NAIP
2010 1"=500'Flight Year: 2010 USDA/NAIP
2009 1"=500'Flight Year: 2009 USDA/NAIP
2008 1"=500'Flight Year: 2008 USDA/NAIP
2006 1"=500'Flight Year: 2006 USDA/NAIP
2005 1"=500'Flight Year: 2005 USDA/NAIP
1996 1"=500'Flight Date: April 25, 1996 NCDOT
1994 1"=500'Acquisition Date: February 26, 1994 USGS/DOQQ
1993 1"=500'Flight Date: February 25, 1993 USGS
1988 1"=500'Flight Date: September 22, 1988 USDA
1983 1"=500'Flight Date: March 03, 1983 USGS
1976 1"=1000'Flight Date: February 12, 1976 USGS
1973 1"=500'Flight Date: March 21, 1973 USGS
1968 1"=500'Flight Date: February 25, 1968 USDA
1965 1"=500'Flight Date: February 22, 1965 USGS
1956 1"=500'Flight Date: March 31, 1956 USDA
1951 1"=500'Flight Date: January 25, 1951 ASCS
1949 1"=500'Flight Date: September 30, 1949 USDA
1941 1"=500'Flight Date: February 22, 1941 USDA
1938 1"=500'Flight Date: February 01, 1938 ASCS
09/08/16
Thomas Road Site ATC Group Services LLC
14816 Thomas Road 7606 Whitehall Executive Cntr
Charlotte, NC 28278 Charlotte, NC 28273-0000
4721182.9 Natalie Waldner
This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, Inc. It cannot
be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. NO WARRANTY
EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY
DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE
OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE,
WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE, ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE, INCLUDING,
WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL
DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS". Any
analyses, estimates, ratings, environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to
provide, nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I
Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any property.
Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice.
Copyright 2016 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map of
Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission.
4721182 9 2
4721182.9
2012
= 500'
4721182.9
2011
= 500'
4721182.9
2010
= 500'
4721182.9
2009
= 500'
4721182.9
2008
= 500'
4721182.9
2006
= 500'
4721182.9
2005
= 500'
4721182.9
1996
= 500'
4721182.9
1994
= 500'
4721182.9
1993
= 500'
4721182.9
1988
= 500'
4721182.9
1983
= 500'
4721182.9
1976
= 1000'
4721182.9
1973
= 500'
4721182.9
1968
= 500'
4721182.9
1965
= 500'
4721182.9
1956
= 500'
4721182.9
1951
= 500'
4721182.9
1949
= 500'
4721182.9
1941
= 500'
4721182.9
1938
= 500'
PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT
Thomas Road Site
14816 Thomas Road
Charlotte, North Carolina 28278

Project No. 199HOP1610 ATC Group Services LLC
APPENDIX G

HISTORICAL RESEARCH DOCUMENTATION
EDR Historical Topo Map Report
Inquiry Number:
6 Armstrong Road, 4th floor
Shelton, CT 06484
Toll Free: 800.352.0050 www.edrnet.com
with QuadMatch™
Thomas Road Site
14816 Thomas Road
Charlotte, NC 28278
September 08, 2016
4721182.4
EDR Historical Topo Map Report
EDR Inquiry #
Search Results:
P.O.#
Project:
Maps Provided:
Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice
EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other trademarks used herein
are the property of their respective owners.
page-
Coordinates:
Latitude:
Longitude:
UTM Zone:
UTM X Meters:
UTM Y Meters:
Elevation:
Contact:
Site Name: Client Name:
2014
1996
1968, 1973
1949
1947
09/08/16
Thomas Road Site ATC Group Services LLC
14816 Thomas Road 7606 Whitehall Executive Cntr
Charlotte, NC 28278 Charlotte, NC 28273-0000
4721182.4 Natalie Waldner
EDR Topographic Map Library has been searched by EDR and maps covering the target property location as provided by
ATC Group Services LLC were identified for the years listed below. EDR’s Historical Topo Map Report is designed to assist
professionals in evaluating potential liability on a target property resulting from past activities. EDRs Historical Topo Map
Report includes a search of a collection of public and private color historical topographic maps, dating back to the late
1800s.
NA 35.07116 35° 4' 16" North
199HOP1610 - Thomas Road -81.009438 -81° 0' 34" West
Zone 17 North
499139.51
3880934.53
734.44' above sea level
This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, Inc. It cannot
be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. NO WARRANTY
EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY
DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE
OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE,
WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE, ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE, INCLUDING,
WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL
DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS". Any
analyses, estimates, ratings, environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to
provide, nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I
Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any property.
Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice.
Copyright 2016 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map of
Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission.
4721182 4 2
page
Topo Sheet Key
This EDR Topo Map Report is based upon the following USGS topographic map sheets.
-
2014 Source Sheets
2014
Fort Mill
7.5-minute, 24000
2014
Lake Wylie
7.5-minute, 24000
1996 Source Sheets
1996
Lake Wylie
7.5-minute, 24000
Aerial Photo Revised 1993
Edited 1996
1996
Fort Mill
7.5-minute, 24000
Aerial Photo Revised 1993
Edited 1996
1968, 1973 Source Sheets
1968
Fort Mill
7.5-minute, 24000
Aerial Photo Revised 1965
1973
Lake Wylie
7.5-minute, 24000
Aerial Photo Revised 1973
1949 Source Sheets
1949
Clover
15-minute, 62500
Aerial Photo Revised 1941
4721182 4 4
page
Topo Sheet Key
This EDR Topo Map Report is based upon the following USGS topographic map sheets.
-
1947 Source Sheets
1947
Clover
15-minute, 62500
Aerial Photo Revised 1941
4721182 4 5
Historical Topo Map
page
SITE NAME:
ADDRESS:
CLIENT:
This report includes information from the
following map sheet(s).
-
EW
SW S SE
NW N NE
2014
0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5
Thomas Road Site
14816 Thomas Road
Charlotte, NC 28278
ATC Group Services LLC
TP, Lake Wylie, 2014, 7.5-minute
E, Fort Mill, 2014, 7.5-minute
4721182 4 6
Historical Topo Map
page
SITE NAME:
ADDRESS:
CLIENT:
This report includes information from the
following map sheet(s).
-
EW
SW S SE
NW N NE
1996
0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5
Thomas Road Site
14816 Thomas Road
Charlotte, NC 28278
ATC Group Services LLC
TP, Lake Wylie, 1996, 7.5-minute
E, Fort Mill, 1996, 7.5-minute
4721182 4 7
Historical Topo Map
page
SITE NAME:
ADDRESS:
CLIENT:
This report includes information from the
following map sheet(s).
-
EW
SW S SE
NW N NE
1968, 1973
0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5
Thomas Road Site
14816 Thomas Road
Charlotte, NC 28278
ATC Group Services LLC
TP, Lake Wylie, 1973, 7.5-minute
E, Fort Mill, 1968, 7.5-minute
4721182 4 8
Historical Topo Map
page
SITE NAME:
ADDRESS:
CLIENT:
This report includes information from the
following map sheet(s).
-
EW
SW S SE
NW N NE
1949
0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5
Thomas Road Site
14816 Thomas Road
Charlotte, NC 28278
ATC Group Services LLC
TP, Clover, 1949, 15-minute
4721182 4 9
Historical Topo Map
page
SITE NAME:
ADDRESS:
CLIENT:
This report includes information from the
following map sheet(s).
-
EW
SW S SE
NW N NE
1947
0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5
Thomas Road Site
14816 Thomas Road
Charlotte, NC 28278
ATC Group Services LLC
TP, Clover, 1947, 15-minute
4721182 4 10
Certified Sanborn® Map Report
Inquiry Number:
6 Armstrong Road, 4th floor
Shelton, CT 06484
Toll Free: 800.352.0050 www.edrnet.com
Thomas Road Site
14816 Thomas Road
Charlotte, NC 28278
September 08, 2016
4721182.3
Certified Sanborn® Map Report
Certified Sanborn Results:
Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice
EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other trademarks used herein
are the property of their respective owners.
page-
The Sanborn Library includes more than 1.2 million
fire insurance maps from Sanborn, Bromley, Perris &
Browne, Hopkins, Barlow and others which track
historical property usage in approximately 12,000
American cities and towns. Collections searched:
Library of Congress
University Publications of America
EDR Private Collection
The Sanborn Library LLC Since 1866™
Limited Permission To Make Copies
Sanborn® Library search results
Certification #
Contact:EDR Inquiry #
Site Name: Client Name:
PO #
Project
09/08/16
Thomas Road Site ATC Group Services LLC
14816 Thomas Road 7606 Whitehall Executive Cntr
Charlotte, NC 28278 Charlotte, NC 28273-0000
4721182.3 Natalie Waldner
The Sanborn Library has been searched by EDR and maps covering the target property location as provided by ATC Group Services LLC
were identified for the years listed below. The Sanborn Library is the largest, most complete collection of fire insurance maps. The collection
includes maps from Sanborn, Bromley, Perris & Browne, Hopkins, Barlow, and others. Only Environmental Data Resources Inc. (EDR) is
authorized to grant rights for commercial reproduction of maps by the Sanborn Library LLC, the copyright holder for the collection. Results
can be authenticated by visiting www.edrnet.com/sanborn.
The Sanborn Library is continually enhanced with newly identified map archives. This report accesses all maps in the collection as of the
day this report was generated.
BE11-4593-99A2
NA
199HOP1610 - Thomas Road
UNMAPPED PROPERTY
This report certifies that the complete holdings of the Sanborn Library,
LLC collection have been searched based on client supplied target
property information, and fire insurance maps covering the target property
were not found.
Certification #: BE11-4593-99A2
ATC Group Services LLC (the client) is permitted to make up to FIVE photocopies of this Sanborn Map transmittal and each fire insurance map accompanying this
report solely for the limited use of its customer. No one other than the client is authorized to make copies. Upon request made directly to an EDR Account Executive,
the client may be permitted to make a limited number of additional photocopies. This permission is conditioned upon compliance by the client, its customer and their
agents with EDR's copyright policy; a copy of which is available upon request.
This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, Inc. It cannot
be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. NO WARRANTY
EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY
DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE
OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE,
WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE, ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE, INCLUDING,
WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL
DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS". Any
analyses, estimates, ratings, environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to
provide, nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I
Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any property.
Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice.
Copyright 2016 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map of
Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission.
4721182 3 2
Thomas Road Site
14816 Thomas Road
Charlotte, NC 28278
Inquiry Number: 4721182.5
September 08, 2016
The EDR-City Directory Abstract
6 Armstrong Road
Shelton, CT 06484
800.352.0050
www.edrnet.comEnvironmental Data Resources IncEnvironmental Data Resources IncEnvironmental Data Resources IncEnvironmental Data Resources Inc
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION
Executive Summary
Findings
City Directory Images
Thank you for your business.
Please contact EDR at 1-800-352-0050
with any questions or comments.
Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice
This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to
Environmental Data Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and
surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE
WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY
DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, MERCHANTABILITY
OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL
ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR
OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE, ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OR DAMAGE, INCLUDING,
WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON
THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT
PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS". Any analyses, estimates, ratings, environmental risk
levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor
should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction orforecast of, any environmental risk for any
property. Only a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide
information regarding the environmental risk for any property. Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to
be construed as legal advice.
Copyright 2016 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in
part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates is prohibited without prior written permission.
EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates.
All other trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
DESCRIPTION
Environmental Data Resources, Inc.’s (EDR) City Directory Abstract is a screening tool designed to assist
environmental professionals in evaluating potential liability on a target property resulting from past activities.
EDR’s City Directory Abstract includes a search and abstract of available city directory data. For each
address, the directory lists the name of the corresponding occupant at five year intervals.
Business directories including city, cross reference and telephone directories were reviewed, if available, at
approximately five year intervals for the years spanning 1921 through 2013. This report compiles
information gathered in this review by geocoding the latitude and longitude of properties identified and
gathering information about properties within 660 feet of the target property.
A summary of the information obtained is provided in the text of this report.
RESEARCH SUMMARY
The following research sources were consulted in the preparation of this report. An "X" indicates where
information was identified in the source and provided in this report.
Source TPYear Adjoining Text Abstract Source Image
2013 Cole Information Services ----
2008 Cole Information Services ----
2005 Hill-Donnelly Information Services ----
1999 City Publishing Company Inc.----
1994 R. L. Polk Co.----
1991 R. L. Polk & Co.----
1989 R. L. Polk Co.----
1984 R. L. Polk & Co.----
1979 Hills City Directory ----
1975 Hills City Directory ----
1974 Hills City Directory ----
1969 Hills City Directory ----
1964 Hills City Directory ----
1959 Hills City Directory ----
1953 Hills City Directory ----
1949 Hills City Directory ----
1944 Hills City Directory ----
1937 Hills City Directory ----
1931 Piedmont Directory Company ----
1925 Commercial Service Co.----
1921 Commercial Service Co.----
4721182-5 Page 1
FINDINGS
TARGET PROPERTY INFORMATION
ADDRESS
14816 Thomas Road
Charlotte, NC 28278
FINDINGS DETAIL
Target Property research detail.
4721182-5 Page 2
FINDINGS
ADJOINING PROPERTY DETAIL
The following Adjoining Property addresses were researched for this report. Detailed findings are provided
for each address.
No Addresses Found
4721182-5 Page 3
FINDINGS
TARGET PROPERTY: ADDRESS NOT IDENTIFIED IN RESEARCH SOURCE
The following Target Property addresses were researched for this report, and the addresses were not
identified in the research source.
Address Researched Address Not Identified in Research Source
14816 Thomas Road 2013, 2008, 2005, 1999, 1994, 1991, 1989, 1984, 1979, 1975, 1974, 1969, 1964,
1959, 1953, 1949, 1944, 1937, 1931, 1925, 1921
PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT
Thomas Road Site
14816 Thomas Road
Charlotte, North Carolina 28278

Project No. 199HOP1610 ATC Group Services LLC
APPENDIX H

PRIOR REPORTS

THIS SECTION INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT
Thomas Road Site
14816 Thomas Road
Charlotte, North Carolina 28278

Project No. 199HOP1610 ATC Group Services LLC
APPENDIX I

RESUMES
ATC hire date: January 2002 Branch office: Charlotte, North Carolina

NATALIE K. WALDNER
Project Manager / National Project Manager
PROFESSIONAL SUMMARY
Environmental consultant with over fourteen years of industry experience conducting Phase I, Phase II, and Transaction Screen Environmental Site Assessments. Extensive practical experience in multiple aspects of environmental assessment and remediation, including soil and groundwater sampling protocols remediation activities related to petroleum contamination, and inspections for asbestos-containing materials, lead-based
paint, indoor air quality, and microbial impact.

PROJECT EXPERIENCE
Regional Due Diligence and National Project Management Activities
 Corporate liaison for two major banking clients which comprised approximately 60 percent of the local office revenue
 Member of corporate steering committee
 Interviewed, selected, and trained staff level consultants
 Prepared bids for Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) opportunities
 Developed training program for new hires in the Phase I ESA consultant role
Phase I ESAs, Environmental Audits, and Transaction Screen Assessments for Various Lenders,
Private Companies, and Real Estate Firms in North Carolina, South Carolina, Virginia, West Virginia,
Tennessee, Kentucky, Missouri, Texas, Georgia, and Florida
 Performed site investigations, reviewed public records, performed historical research, and prepared and reviewed reports for various sites, including commercial, residential, and industrial facilities.
 Performed site investigations, reviewed public records, performed historical research, and prepared and reviewed reports for various sites, including commercial, residential, and industrial facilities.
Phase I ESAs and NEPA Land Use Checklists
 Bechtel Corporation, Telecommunications Towers in North Carolina, South Carolina, and West Virginia
 Performed ESAs and completed NEPA requirements for collocation and raw-land telecommunications tower sites.
Phase II ESAs for Various Oil Companies in North Carolina and South Carolina
 Performed groundwater and soil sampling events, monitoring well installation, sensitive receptor surveys, aggressive fluid vapor recovery (AFVR) oversight, and well surveys.
 Prepared various types of client and regulatory driven reports, including Phase II ESA reports.
Indoor Inspections and Investigations/ North Carolina and South Carolina
 Performed limited bulk ACM inspections for due diligence transactions, building demolitions and renovations for apartment complexes, commercial buildings, schools, and residential homes.

Natalie K. Waldner
Page | 2

 Performed indoor air quality and microbial investigations for commercial office and retail buildings, as well as multi-family and single-family residential buildings. Tasks included evaluation of the extent and cause of the moisture intrusion issues, sampling, and report preparation.
PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATIONS
 Certified Asbestos Building Inspector North Carolina Accreditation #12446, South Carolina Accreditation #BI-00585
 Mold Assessment and Remediation in Buildings training course, Atlanta, Georgia, 2003.
 Meets the definition of Environmental Professional as defined in § 312.10 of 40 CFR 312

EDUCATION
 B.S.P.H., Bachelor of Science in Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 2000

TRAINING AND CERTIFICATIONS
 ASTM Phase I and Phase II Processes Training
 OSHA 29 CFR 1910.120 40-hour Safety Training
 OSHA 29 CFR 1910.120 8-hour Annual Refresher Safety Training

PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS
 Commercial Real Estate Women, CREW Charlotte member since January 2010

ATC hire date: Month/Year Branch office: Woburn, MA
David A. Hunter, PG, RSM
Principal Scientist / Environmental Division Manager
PROFESSIONAL SUMMARY
Mr. Hunter has 23 years of professional experience in environmental
consulting and specialty construction management. As Principal
Scientist and Charlotte Environmental Division Manager for ATC, Mr.
Hunter is responsible for the oversight and management of
environmental programs and projects in the Southeastern United
States.
Petroleum and Hazardous Waste Consulting
 Mr. Hunter has extensive experience with subsurface assessment
and successful remediation of hazardous waste and petroleum
impact to soil and groundwater in various environments. Impact
types have included chlorinated solvents, polychlorinated
biphenyls (PCBs), metals, non-chlorinated solvents,
radionuclides, and petroleum. Soil, shallow and bedrock
groundwater, surface water, sediment and indoor atmosphere
comprise the affected media at various sites, and the
physiographic environments have included residuum and bedrock
of the Piedmont and Blue Ridge, as well as consolidated and
unconsolidated sediments of the Coastal Plain and Valley and
Ridge.
Brownfields and Environmental Due Diligence
 Mr. Hunter has direct project experience with a Brownfields Pilot
Project where interface with the state and federal EPA occurred
at the inception of the Brownfields Program in 1999 and 2000. He
also performed assessment at a Brownfield site in Charlotte at a
former plating facility. Mr. Hunter has extensive experience with
environmental due diligence assessments for projects that are not
in formal Brownfields programs but had similar regulatory and
client conditions and requirements. Mr. Hunter has performed
and/or managed hundreds of Phase I Environmental Site
Assessments (ESAs) in compliance with ASTM standards and
client-specific standards and has performed dozens of Phase II
ESAs for numerous facility types in various settings.
Hazardous Building Materials Surveys and Indoor Air Quality
 Mr. Hunter has performed project management and reporting on
many asbestos and several lead-based paint projects and has
performed the entire scope and project management for
approximately 35 mold and moisture surveys. Additionally, he has
performed indoor atmospheric evaluations for various organic
compounds, hexavalent chromium from plating operations, and
metal fumes associated with foundries and metal machining and
finishing.
Specialty and Remedial Construction Management
 Mr. Hunter has performed construction management for subsurface facility expansion in environmentally
compromised conditions; decommissioning of facilities that are hazardous waste generators and permit
•Over 20 years of
experience in
environmental
consulting and specialty
construction
management
•Petroleum assessment
and remediation for
retail and upstream
facilities
•Expertise in
management of
subsurface
environmental impact
including assessment,
groundwater fate and
transport, and remedial
implementation and
optimization
•Implementation of
innovative assessment
and remedial
technologies
•Compliance services
including SWPPPs,
SPCCs, and facility
compliance audits
•Geophysics for
environmental,
construction support,
and archaeological
studies
•Vapor intrusion and
other IH studies and
remediation
•Remedial construction,
construction in
hazardous soils, and
facility decommissioning

Name and Last Name, Suffix
Page | 2

holders; remedial system installation for various impact types; and excavations of hazardous waste and
petroleum impacted soils.
Geophysics
 Mr. Hunter has conducted geophysical surveys using ground-penetrating radar (GPR), seismic refraction,
electromagnetic induction, and magnetometer methods for environmental, civil engineering, geologic, and
archaeological applications. Major geophysical projects include landfill cell identification, location of other
buried sources of contamination, delineation of geologic structures and conditions, location of grave sites
and former building foundations, buried voids and voids beneath slabs, identification of structural steel in
concrete, evaluation of earthen and concrete dams, and determination of buried foundation extents and
depths.
Engineering Geology
 Mr. Hunter has provided support for engineering projects including slope stability, rock quality designation,
seismic analysis, geophysics, and geologic characterization on civil and geotechnical engineering projects,
including dams, large excavations, sinkholes, rock face stability at construction sites, and hazardous waste
treatment, storage, and disposal facilities.

PROJECT EXPERIENCE
 Academy Steel Drum / Matthews, North Carolina Mr. Hunter managed and served in responsible
professional charge for assessment and remediation of a former drum refurbisher where waste burial had
occurred before the inception of hazardous waste regulations. During the long-term project, Mr. Hunter
interacted with the Inactive Hazardous Sites Branch (IHSB) from work plan development, remedial
investigation, feasibility studies with soil remedial evaluation using innovative methods and pilot testing,
ecological and human health risk assessment, remedial action planning, remedial implementation and
remedial monitoring. The project team performed remedial actions including soil excavation and
stabilization to non-hazardous concentrations using remedial additives with off-site disposal for impact
above industrial/commercial standards; capping of areas with impact above IHSB standards; and repair of
a storm drain line in an area with an environmentally compromised subsurface. Recent work has included
an impact leaching evaluation to obtain regulatory closure.
 Petroleum Remediation / Greenville, South Carolina A South Carolina government agency had a site
at a major interstate intersection with prior petroleum impact to soil and groundwater that required
aggressive remedial action to aid in property sale. The project team devised an approach of rapid removal
of soil undergoing ineffective ex-situ remediation by another consultant, followed by application of
intercalated calcium peroxide and sucrose to the subsurface. The initial injection lead to a desorption event
(impact increase) followed by rapid decrease of groundwater impact. The project team re-evaluated the
conditions and recommended another injection event, which resulted in an even stronger desorption, with
impact remaining above state groundwater standards in only one well after a year. The initial event
persuaded a buyer of the state agency’s intent to actively pursue the impact, and the property sold. During
a second property sale, the project team assisted the buyers in obtaining a provisional notice of no further
action with lowered monitoring requirements, and another round of semi-annual monitoring allowed closure
of the site under a final no further action status after the monitoring well network contained no detectable
impact.
 Transaction Environmental Analysis / Confidential Telecommunications / Client in North and South
Carolina Provided program management for a telecommunications company’s environmental analysis
during real property transactions throughout the Carolinas. The work included Transaction Screens
(ASTM-1528) or Phase I ESAs (ASTM-1527) for approximately 100 sites during the program period.
Because of the property locations in commercial and industrial areas, many projects required Phase II

Name and Last Name, Suffix
Page | 3

ESAs, and occasionally sites required remediation upon completion of the transaction. The work often had
tight time constraints and had to be conducted in accordance with ASTM requirements and company
Methods and Procedures. The program team complied with the scope and schedule requirements for each
authorized project and provided reliable due diligence support for one of the largest telecom providers in
the United States.
 Brownfield Pilot Project / Cowpens, South Carolina Conducted Brownfields program implementation
and community outreach for a South Carolina Brownfield Pilot Project at the former Health-Tex facility. The
work entailed completion of a remedial investigation work plan and implementation of the remedial
investigation with innovative investigative methods including geophysical investigations of potential source
areas with GPR and electromagnetic induction, soil vapor surveying and indoor air quality evaluations, as
well as standard borings, monitor wells (shallow and bedrock), and surface water sampling. The work
resulted in completion of on-site investigation and identification of source areas; however, the degree and
extent of impact resulted in the site being transferred to the Superfund Section where continued
assessment has defined one of the largest industrial impact plumes in the state.
 Geophysical Evaluation of Nuclear and Solid Waste Landfills / Various Locations / Southeastern
United States Used ground-penetrating radar (GPR) and electromagnetic induction (EM) in various
applications for delineating subsurface conditions at landfill sites. At the Savannah River Plant, nuclear
waste burial trenches were mapped using GPR so that trench consolidation technology could be applied
to reduce surface water infiltration. Geologic units outside the trenches were also mapped for correlation
with hydrogeologic information from the groundwater monitoring network. Municipal solid waste burial cells
were defined for landfills in Florida, Georgia and South Carolina. Burial areas at abandoned industrial
waste landfills in Henderson and Wilkes counties, North Carolina, were defined by EM surveying for later
excavation and proper disposal. The precision of delineation by GPR and EM allowed cost savings for
management of the waste by reducing excavation, burial cell compaction, and monitoring costs.
 Petroleum Hydrocarbon Release Assessments and Remediation / Various Facilities for Various
Petroleum Impacted Sites / North and South Carolina Conducted various projects in North and South
Carolina for petroleum releases from aboveground and underground storage tanks. Project tasks included
large plume delineation using groundwater modelling techniques to reduce the total number of required
wells. Sites had free product and groundwater contamination that threatened drinking water supplies.
Assessment activities often had to be conducted rapidly so that corrective action could prevent migration
of contaminants to water supply wells. Special circumstances included defining free product volume and
recoverability in confined aquifer conditions; use of permeability enhancement techniques in soil and
bedrock; and rapid assessment techniques. Corrective action technologies such as soil vacuum extraction,
in-situ bioremediation and chemical oxidation, free product recovery and separation, air stripping with
carbon adsorption polish, and risk-based corrective action have been designed, pilot tested and
implemented at the sites.
 Landfill Soil Vapor and Groundwater Assessment / County Landfill in the Piedmont of South
Carolina Developed strategy and conducted a soil vapor survey for evaluation of organic compound
impact at a 30-year old municipal solid waste landfill, at the request of a large civil engineering design firm.
The soil vapor survey design provided cost savings as compared to traditional groundwater assessments
by delineating source area locations and principal impact constituents; defining potential downgradient
extent for groundwater impact; and evaluating of groundwater and soil vapor interaction based on
application of Henry's Law to the data set. Because the detection limits for constituents of interest were
0.1 parts per billion in the vapor phase, the shallow soil vapor data could validly assess the groundwater
concentrations at depth and in downgradient areas where only low groundwater concentrations occur.
 Pesticide Remediation with Chemical Oxidation Performed pesticides remediation for a real estate
holdings company at a planned mixed-use development of a property near the South End area of Charlotte,
where prior due diligence had identified an area of pesticides impact to soil and groundwater. To avoid
property devaluation in an area where property is nearing $100 per square foot and the inevitable risk

Name and Last Name, Suffix
Page | 4

scrutiny by insurance and banking professionals, the client requested a rapid remedial investigation and
remedial implementation. Based on good relationships with state regulators, Mr. Hunter’s project team
completed the work in one phase of work and received authorization for remedial implementation. The
remediation consisted of removal and landfilling of the pesticides-impacted soil (1,300 tons) and remedial
application of sodium persulfate to address the limited groundwater impact. The remedial fluid was applied
directly to the groundwater exposed in the excavation, and the excavation was closed by backfilling with
quarry stone. Re-installation and testing of the monitoring well network at three, one-month intervals
detected no pesticides impact, and Mr. Hunter’s team obtained a Notice of No Further Action within
approximately nine months of project inception.
 Environmental Decommissioning, York, South Carolina When a competitor purchased the assets of
EFP Products, representatives of EFP and the buyer (MPC Industries) contacted Mr. Hunter, based on his
past experience with the facility, to assist with environment decommissioning of the facility interior. Since
the 1940s, EFP and its predecessors had conducted chrome plating and surface texturing of molds that
are used by pressed countertop and flooring materials manufacturers. The scheduling of decommissioning
activities were planned and executed in a way that allowed for waste consolidation and staged permit
closures to meet the regulatory and logistics considerations. Initial monitoring provided a baseline for
health and safety protocols at various locations, and initial evaluation of decommissioning and surface
cleaning procedures for each waste type used method-critical assessment and pre and post-clean wipe
sampling and analysis. The team worked in coordination to schedule work around rigging crews and heavy
equipment operators who were on a strict schedule for material being transported to a new facility. Close
attention to planning and continuous operational adjustments during execution allowed project to be
completed under budget and in coordination with rigging and transport plans for moving the equipment to
a new facility with proper closing and transfer of the facility environmental permits.
 Fungal Microbial Assessment and Abatement Performed a thorough fungal microbial assessment and
limited abatement for a luxury hotel franchisee in Charlotte, North Carolina. The hotel contacted ATC after
the franchiser threatened closure of the facility, based on limited moisture and apparent mold impact,
unless clearance by a certified industrial hygienist could be assured for the building within three weeks.
Mr. Hunter assembled an industrial hygiene team from the southeast region of ATC Associates to conduct
the project. The assessment included atmospheric non-viable fungal and field parameters, as well as
materials moisture evaluation using infra-red camera imaging and direct moisture measurements. As the
survey progressed and limited areas were found to have impact, Mr. Hunter designed a limited fungal
abatement protocol that resulted in clearance of approximately 90 percent of the affected areas, and the
infra-red imaging also identified areas in the building envelope that were sealed by a third party contractor
from the exterior. A remaining three guest rooms required full-scale fungal abatement, which was
successful and provided hotel clearance within the specified time-frame.

PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATIONS
 Licensed Professional Geologist (NC# 1171; SC#1123; GA#867)
EDUCATION
 M.S. Studies, Geology, Fort Hays State University, 1990
 B.S. Studies, Geology, Furman University, 1985
TRAINING AND CERTIFICATIONS
 Mr. Hunter has attended various continuing education courses in geology, groundwater hydraulics,
environmental fate and transport, geophysics, risk assessment, and due diligence and has experience in
lecturing on geophysics and innovative assessment techniques for professional seminars.
PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT
Thomas Road Site
14816 Thomas Road
Charlotte, North Carolina 28278

Project No. 199HOP1610 ATC Group Services LLC
APPENDIX J

RECORDS OF COMMUNICATION

RECORDS OF COMMUNICATION

Role Name Title/Company Contact Information

Site Manager
Mr. Larry Core
Property Manager / SouthEast
Commercial Real Estate Group
Inc.
Office- 704-370-3000
Cell- 704-906-6371
Site Resident Ms. Kendra (last name
not provided) Property resident None, in person
interview
Local Govt.
Official Mr. Dennis Tyndall
Mecklenburg County Land Use
and Environmental Services
Agency
980-314-2633

Local Govt.
Official
Battalion Chief Garry
McCormick
Battalion Chief / Charlotte Fire
Department
704-336-4174
Local Utility
Official
Representative Charlotte Water 704-336-7600

PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT
Thomas Road Site
14816 Thomas Road
Charlotte, North Carolina 28278

Project No. 199HOP1610 ATC Group Services LLC
APPENDIX K

LABORATORY REPORTS

THIS SECTION INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT
Thomas Road Site
14816 Thomas Road
Charlotte, North Carolina 28278

Project No. 199HOP1610 ATC Group Services LLC
APPENDIX L

OTHER SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION
9/9/2016 Property Detail Print View
http://meckcama.co.mecklenburg.nc.us/RELookup/Property/Print?parcelId=21703102 1/1
Print  
Close

Parcel Information
Parcel ID Account Parent Previous
21703102 INDIVIDUAL
Owner(s)
Owner Name Mailing Address  City/State
GILES DORIS H % DAVID GILES BY ENTIRETY 14900 THOMAS RD CHARLOTTE NC 28278
Legal Information
Legal Municipality Date Annexed Special District Fire District Acreage
NA MECKLENBURG COUNTY­UNINCORPORATED FIRE SERVICE A STEELE CREEK #2 37.64
Total Parcel Assessment
Building Land Features Total
0 1656200 100 1656300
Exemptions
Exemption Year Approved Review Date Amount
AGRICULT FLG 2009 1/1/2017 0
Sales Information
Sale Price Stamps Qualify VI Type Legal Ref.GrantorJan 1 1975 0 IMP WARRANTY D 01876­172
Land Use
Use Units Type Neighborhood Assessment610037ACV70110360
6100 0.64 AC V701 28200
Building Information
Bldg Description Type Year Property Location
14816 THOMAS RD UNINC
Bldg Story Units Total SqFt Heated SqFt Foundation Ext. Wall Grade Value
Bldg Heat Fuel Fire Place AC Fixtures Bedrooms Full Baths 3/4 Baths 1/2 Baths
Sub Area
Bldg Description Size
Depreciation
Bldg Physical Functional Economic Special Override
Special Features & Yard Items
Bldg Built Type Quantity Units Value
1 1963 TERRACE 1 24.00000 100
Notes
Tax Year Notes Note Date
Value Changes
Notice Date Tax Year Reason Changed To Deferred
Mar 21 2011 2011 Revised Notice 1656300 1617640
Feb 8 2011 2011 Countywide Revaluation 1656300 1619120
Jun 1 2009 2009 Forest Use Value 691280 649200Jan 17 2003 2003 Countywide Revaluation 669100 0
Mar 20 1998 1998 Countywide Revaluation 316160
Sep 2 1997 1997 Division of Land and/or New Parcel 293590
Sep 2 1997 1997 Division of Real Estate and/or New Parce 293590
Apr 15 1991 1991 Equalization of Value 348400Jan 2 1991 1991 Countywide Revaluation 453030
9/9/2016 Property Detail Print View
http://meckcama.co.mecklenburg.nc.us/RELookup/Property/Print?parcelId=21703155 1/1
Print  
Close

Parcel Information
Parcel ID Account Parent Previous
21703155 INDIVIDUAL 21703155
Owner(s)
Owner Name Mailing Address  City/State
GILES LARRY W 211 HOWINGTON CIR FORT MILL SC 29715
IRIS G APPERSON 211 HOWINGTON CIR FORT MILL SC 29715
Legal Information
Legal Municipality Date Annexed Special District Fire District Acreage
L1 M27­884 MECKLENBURG COUNTY­UNINCORPORATED FIRE SERVICE A STEELE CREEK #2 1.116
Total Parcel Assessment
Building Land Features Total
69200 49300 100 118600
Exemptions
Exemption Year Approved Review Date Amount
Sales InformationSale Price Stamps Qualify VI Type Legal Ref.Grantor
Mar 18 1997 73000 RELATED IMP DEED STAMPS 08973­700 GILES DORIS H (BY EN
Land UseUse Units Type Neighborhood Assessment
R120 1.12 AC V701 49300
Building Information
Bldg Description Type Year Property Location
1 Single­Fam RES 1963 THOMAS RD UNINC
Bldg Story Units Total SqFt Heated SqFt Foundation Ext. Wall Grade Value
1 1 STORY 1 2280 1092 CRAWL SPACE FACE BRICK ­AVERAGE 03 69200
Bldg Heat Fuel Fire Place AC Fixtures Bedrooms Full Baths 3/4 Baths 1/2 Baths1AIR­DUCTED OIL/WD/COAL 1 ­ FP3 AC­NONE 0 3 1 0 1
Sub Area
Bldg Description Size
1 BASE (FIRST FLOOR)1092
1 BASEMENT ­ UNFINISHED 1092
1 PORCH ­ UNFINISHED 96
Depreciation
Bldg Physical Functional Economic Special Override1AV ­ 36.00%­ 5.00%­ 0.00%­ 0.00%­ 0.00%
Special Features & Yard Items
Bldg Built Type Quantity Units Value
1 1963 TERRACE 1 24.00000 100
Notes
Tax Year Notes Note Date
Value Changes
Notice Date Tax Year Reason Changed To Deferred
Feb 8 2011 2011 Countywide Revaluation 124900 0Jan 17 2003 2003 Countywide Revaluation 111100 0
Mar 20 1998 1998 Countywide Revaluation 86100
Sep 2 1997 1997 Division of Land and/or New Parcel 58950
Sep 2 1997 1997 Division of Real Estate and/or New Parce 58950
Soil Map—Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
Natural Resources
Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey
National Cooperative Soil Survey
9/9/2016
Page 1 of 3388070038808003880900388100038811003881200388070038808003880900388100038811003881200498800498900499000499100499200499300499400499500499600
498800 498900 499000 499100 499200 499300 499400 499500 499600
35° 4' 26'' N 81° 0' 51'' W35° 4' 26'' N81° 0' 13'' W35° 4' 6'' N
81° 0' 51'' W35° 4' 6'' N
81° 0' 13'' WN
Map projection: Web Mercator Corner coordinates: WGS84 Edge tics: UTM Zone 17N WGS84
0 200 400 800 1200Feet
0 50 100 200 300Meters
Map Scale: 1:4,320 if printed on A landscape (11" x 8.5") sheet.
MAP LEGEND MAP INFORMATION
Area of Interest (AOI)
Area of Interest (AOI)
Soils
Soil Map Unit Polygons
Soil Map Unit Lines
Soil Map Unit Points
Special Point Features
Blowout
Borrow Pit
Clay Spot
Closed Depression
Gravel Pit
Gravelly Spot
Landfill
Lava Flow
Marsh or swamp
Mine or Quarry
Miscellaneous Water
Perennial Water
Rock Outcrop
Saline Spot
Sandy Spot
Severely Eroded Spot
Sinkhole
Slide or Slip
Sodic Spot
Spoil Area
Stony Spot
Very Stony Spot
Wet Spot
Other
Special Line Features
Water Features
Streams and Canals
Transportation
Rails
Interstate Highways
US Routes
Major Roads
Local Roads
Background
Aerial Photography
The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at 1:24,000.
Warning: Soil Map may not be valid at this scale.
Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause
misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil line
placement. The maps do not show the small areas of contrasting
soils that could have been shown at a more detailed scale.
Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map
measurements.
Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey URL: http://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov
Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857)
Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator
projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts
distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the
Albers equal-area conic projection, should be used if more accurate
calculations of distance or area are required.
This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as of
the version date(s) listed below.
Soil Survey Area: Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
Survey Area Data: Version 14, Sep 10, 2014
Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales 1:50,000
or larger.
Date(s) aerial images were photographed: Feb 11, 2011—Feb
13, 2011
The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were
compiled and digitized probably differs from the background
imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor shifting
of map unit boundaries may be evident.
Soil Map—Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
Natural Resources
Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey
National Cooperative Soil Survey
9/9/2016
Page 2 of 3
Map Unit Legend
Mecklenburg County, North Carolina (NC119)
Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AOI Percent of AOI
ApB Appling sandy loam, 2 to 8
percent slopes
7.1 19.3%
ApD Appling sandy loam, 8 to 15
percent slopes
10.1 27.4%
CeB2 Cecil sandy clay loam, 2 to 8
percent slopes, moderately
eroded
2.5 6.7%
PaE Pacolet sandy loam, 15 to 25
percent slopes
17.2 46.6%
Totals for Area of Interest 36.9 100.0%
Soil Map—Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
Natural Resources
Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey
National Cooperative Soil Survey
9/9/2016
Page 3 of 3
Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
PaE—Pacolet sandy loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 3t96
Elevation: 200 to 1,400 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 37 to 60 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 66 degrees F
Frost-free period: 200 to 240 days
Farmland classification: Not prime farmland
Map Unit Composition
Pacolet and similar soils: 85 percent
Minor components: 13 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the
mapunit.
Description of Pacolet
Setting
Landform: Hillslopes on ridges
Landform position (two-dimensional): Backslope
Landform position (three-dimensional): Side slope
Down-slope shape: Linear
Across-slope shape: Convex
Parent material: Saprolite derived from granite and gneiss and/or
schist
Typical profile
Ap - 0 to 5 inches: sandy loam
E - 5 to 8 inches: sandy loam
Bt - 8 to 29 inches: clay
BC - 29 to 38 inches: sandy clay loam
C - 38 to 80 inches: sandy loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 15 to 25 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Natural drainage class: Well drained
Runoff class: High
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat):
Moderately high to high (0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water storage in profile: Moderate (about 7.4 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 4e
Hydrologic Soil Group: B
Map Unit Description: Pacolet sandy loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes---Mecklenburg County, North
Carolina
Natural Resources
Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey
National Cooperative Soil Survey
9/9/2016
Page 1 of 2
Hydric soil rating: No
Minor Components
Spartanburg
Percent of map unit: 8 percent
Landform: Hillslopes on ridges
Landform position (two-dimensional): Backslope
Landform position (three-dimensional): Side slope
Down-slope shape: Linear
Across-slope shape: Convex
Hydric soil rating: No
Bethlehem
Percent of map unit: 5 percent
Landform: Hillslopes on ridges
Landform position (two-dimensional): Backslope
Landform position (three-dimensional): Side slope
Down-slope shape: Linear
Across-slope shape: Convex
Hydric soil rating: No
Data Source Information
Soil Survey Area: Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
Survey Area Data: Version 14, Sep 10, 2014
Map Unit Description: Pacolet sandy loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes---Mecklenburg County, North
Carolina
Natural Resources
Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey
National Cooperative Soil Survey
9/9/2016
Page 2 of 2
Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
ApD—Appling sandy loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 3t8c
Elevation: 200 to 1,400 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 37 to 60 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 66 degrees F
Frost-free period: 200 to 240 days
Farmland classification: Farmland of statewide importance
Map Unit Composition
Appling and similar soils: 85 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the
mapunit.
Description of Appling
Setting
Landform: Hillslopes on ridges
Landform position (two-dimensional): Backslope
Landform position (three-dimensional): Side slope
Down-slope shape: Linear
Across-slope shape: Convex
Parent material: Saprolite derived from granite and gneiss and/or
schist
Typical profile
Ap - 0 to 6 inches: sandy loam
E - 6 to 9 inches: sandy loam
BE - 9 to 12 inches: sandy clay loam
Bt - 12 to 48 inches: clay
BC - 48 to 53 inches: sandy clay loam
C - 53 to 80 inches: sandy clay loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 8 to 15 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Natural drainage class: Well drained
Runoff class: Medium
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat):
Moderately high to high (0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water storage in profile: Moderate (about 8.9 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 3e
Hydrologic Soil Group: B
Map Unit Description: Appling sandy loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes---Mecklenburg County, North
Carolina
Natural Resources
Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey
National Cooperative Soil Survey
9/9/2016
Page 1 of 2
Hydric soil rating: No
Data Source Information
Soil Survey Area: Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
Survey Area Data: Version 14, Sep 10, 2014
Map Unit Description: Appling sandy loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes---Mecklenburg County, North
Carolina
Natural Resources
Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey
National Cooperative Soil Survey
9/9/2016
Page 2 of 2
Thomas Road Site
Sep 12, 2016
This map is for general reference only. The US Fish and Wildlife Service is not
responsible for the accuracy or currentness of the base data shown on this map. All
wetlands related data should be used in accordance with the layer metadata found on
the Wetlands Mapper web site.User Remarks:
PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT
Thomas Road Site
14816 Thomas Road
Charlotte, North Carolina 28278

Project No. 199HOP1610 ATC Group Services LLC
APPENDIX M

TERMINOLOGY
PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT
Thomas Road Site
14816 Thomas Road
Charlotte, North Carolina 28278

Project No. 199HOP1610 ATC Group Services LLC
TERMINOLOGY

The following provides definitions and descriptions of certain terms that may be used in this report. Italics
indicate terms that are defined by ASTM Standard Practice E1527-13. The Standard Practice should be
referenced for further detail (such as the precise wording), related definitions or additional explanation
regarding the meaning of terms.

recognized environmental condition(s) (REC) - the presence or likely presence of any hazardous
substances or petroleum products in, on, or at a property: (1) due to any release to the environment; (2)
under conditions indicative of a release to the environment; or (3) under conditions that pose a material
threat of a future release to the environment.

material threat - a physically observable or obvious threat which is reasonably likely to lead to a release
that, in the opinion of the environmental professional (EP), is threatening and might result in impact to
public health or the environment. An example might include an aboveground storage tank system that
contains a hazardous substance and which shows evidence of damage such that it may cause or
contribute to tank integrity failure with a release of contents to the environment.

de minimis condition – is a condition that generally does not present a threat to human health or the
environment and that generally would not be the subject of an enforcement action if brought to the
attention of the appropriate governmental agencies. An example might include a release of hazardous
substances or petroleum products that could reasonably and foreseeably result in a concentration
exceeding the applicable regulatory agency risk-based residential standards or substantial damage to
natural resources. The risk of that exposure or damage would represent a threat to human health or the
environment. If an enforcement action would be less likely than not, then the condition is considered to be
generally not likely the subject of an enforcement action. A condition determined to be de minimis is not a
REC or controlled recognized environmental condition (CREC).

historical recognized environmental condition(s) (HREC) - a past release of any hazardous substances or
petroleum products that has occurred in connection with the property and has been addressed to the
satisfaction of the applicable regulatory authority or meeting unrestricted use criteria established by a
regulatory authority, without subjecting the property to any required controls (for example, property use
restrictions, activity and use limitations, institutional controls, or engineering controls). Before calling the
past release a HREC, the EP must determine whether the past release is a REC at the time the
assessment is conducted (for example, if there has been a change in the regulatory criteria). If the EP
considers the past release to be a REC at the time the Phase I ESA is conducted, the condition will be
reported in Section 1.2 the Findings and Conclusions Summary table as a REC.

controlled recognized environmental condition (CREC) - a recognized environmental condition resulting
from a past release of hazardous substances or petroleum products that has been addressed to the
satisfaction of the applicable regulatory authority (for example, as evidenced by the issuance of a no
further action letter or equivalent, or meeting risk-based criteria established by regulatory authority), with
hazardous substances or petroleum products allowed to remain in place subject to the implementation of
required controls (for example, property use restrictions, activity and use limitation, institutional controls, or
engineering controls). Per E1527-13, a CREC will be reported in the Section 1.2 Findings and Conclusions
Summary table as a CREC and a REC.

migrate/migration - refers to the movement of hazardous substances or petroleum products in any form,
including, for example, solid and liquid at the surface or subsurface, and vapor in the subsurface