HomeMy WebLinkAboutMO-9406_40849_CA_RPTS_20180510_ Environmental Assessment ReportFFOX
=W'lp- ECS SOUTHEAST, LLP "Setting the Standard for Service"
Geotechnical • Construction Materials • Environmental • Facilities NC Rewste,eo Engmeenno F (P, F. 1678
NC R,g,atere.d Ggolog,s15 Firm C-306
SC Registered Engineenng F,,m 3234
Trudy Beverly, LG
Hydrogeologist
NCDEQ - Division of Waste Management
Underground Storage Tanks Section — Corrective Action Branch
Mooresville Regional Office
610 East Center Ave., Suite 301
Mooresville, NC 28115
Reference: 8,000-Gallon Non -Regulated Heating Oil UST
4101 Meadow Oak Drive
Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
ECS Project No. 49-6535-J (Meadow Oaks Industrial)
Dear Ms. Beverly:
December 6, 2018
RECEIVED
DEC 11 2018
NCDEQ WHO UST
ECS Southeast, LLP (ECS) prepared this correspondence and the attached report on behalf of its client,
Exeter 4100 Meadow Oak, LLC. From our telephone conversations of December 5 and 6, 2018, ECS
understands that NCDEQ is requesting that a Phase I Limited Site Assessment (Phase I LSA) be completed
for the release at this UST. Per our telephone discussions, ECS is forwarding a copy a Report of
Environmental Assessment which was prepared in May 2018 before the UST removed in September 2018.
Although this report is not a Phase I LSA, it does contain many elements of such a report. ECS is hopeful
that this report will provide NCDEQ with information so it can assign a risk classification to this site and a
NFA letter may be generated.
It should be noted that our client is pursuing acquisition of the property for development for
industrial/commercial purposes and is not the party responsible for the release. It is our understanding
the owner and operator of the UST from which the release occurred is The State of North Carolina. It is
our understanding that the North Carolina Department of Administration manages the property.
Also attached to this is a Notice of Residual Petroleum which has been executed by the North Carolina
Department of Administration. It is our understanding that this document must be filed with the
Mecklenburg County Register of Deeds before ownership of the property may be transferred. ECS
requests that NCDEQ review and execute this document and return it to ECS so it may filed with the
Mecklenburg County Register of Deeds.
ECS Capitol Selvtces. PLL.0 • ECS Florida, LLC - ECS Mid -Atlantic, LLC • ECS Midwest, LLC • ECS Southeast, LLP • ECS Texas. LLP
www.ecslimited.com
ECS SOUTHEAST, LLP
Thank you for your attention to this matter. If you have questions or comments, please contact us.
Respectfully submitted, RECEIVED
ECS SOUTHEAST, LLP DEC 11 2018
Y061141", e ;r, -)/. -,7qgbJ&, IvCDEQ MRO UST
Joseph P. Nestor, P.G., P.E. Matthew H. McDuff ie, P.G.
Senior Environmental Project Manager Principal Geologist
inestor(@ecslimited.com mmcduffie@ecslimited.com
704-280-7422 704-378-9003
Attachments: Report of Environmental Assessment
Notice of Residual Petroleum
ECS Project No. 49:6535-1
Page 1 2
TM
REPORT OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT
MEADOW OAK INDUSTRIAL
4101 MEADOW OAK DRIVE
CHARLOTTE, MECKLENBURG COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
ECS PROJECT 49:6535-B
PREPARED FOR:
EXETER PROPERTY GROUP
MAY 10, 2018
0
ECS SOUTHEAST, LLP "Setting the Standard for Service"
Geotechnical • Construction Materials • Environmental • Facilities NC Registered Engineering Firm F-1078
NC Registered Geologists Firm C-406
SC Registered Engineering Firm 3239
May 10, 2018
Adam Duerr
Exeter Property Group
6285 Barfield Road, Suite 225
Atlanta, Georgia 30328
Reference: Report of Environmental Assessment
Meadow Oak Industrial
4101 Meadow Oak Drive
Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
ECS Project No. 49:6535-B
Dear Mr. Duerr:
ECS Southeast, LLP (ECS) is pleased to present Exeter Property Group with the results of our
Environmental Assessment for the above -referenced site. ECS's services were provided in accordance
with ECS proposal No. 49:8411P dated April 11, 2018 and authorized on April 13, 2018. ECS appreciates
the opportunity to provide our services to you. If there are questions regarding this report, or a need
for further information, please contact us.
Respectfully submitted,
ECS SOUTHEAST, LLP
Shaun Andrew Brewer
Assistant Staff Project Manager
sabrewer@ecslimited.com
704-525-5152
A, tL
John S. Lair, P. G.
Principal Geologist
flair@ecslimited.com
910-726-3035
P. t -?,/, -; k � �— A, e L, -
Matthew H. M`Duffie, P.G.
Senior Environmental Project Manager
MMcDuffie(@ecslimited.com
704-525-5152
ECS Capitol Services, PLLC • ECS Florida, LLC • ECS Mid -Atlantic, LLC • ECS Midwest, LLC • ECS Southeast, LLP • ECS Texas, LLP
www.ecslimited.com
Report of Environmental Assessment
Meadow Oak Industrial
ECS Project No. 49:6535-8
May 10, 2018
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0
PROJECT INFORMATION....................................................................................................................1
2.0
SCOPE OF SERVICES............................................................................................................................1
3.0
RESULTS..............................................................................................................................................3
4.0
CONCLUSIONS....................................................................................................................................3
5.0
RECOMMENDATIONS.........................................................................................................................3
FIGURES
Figure 1
Site Location Map
Figure 2
Site Map
Figure 3
Groundwater Boring Location Map
Figure 4
Sample Location Map
TABLES
Table 1 Summary of Soil Analytical Results
APPENDIX
Appendix A Photograph Log
Appendix B Monitoring Well Permits
Appendix C Boring Logs
Appendix D Laboratory Analytical Data and Chain of Custody Record
1
Report of Environmental Assessment
Meadow Oak Industrial
ECS Project No. 49:6535-8
May 10, 2018
1.0 PROJECT INFORMATION
The subject property is located at 4101 Meadow Oak Drive in Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, North
Carolina (Figures 1 and 2) and is identified by Mecklenburg County GIS as Parcel Identification Number (PIN)
14326112. The 46.81 acre site is currently vacant and contains several structures associated with the
former Charlotte correctional facility located in the southeast portion of the subject property. The subject
property is predominately undeveloped wooded land, with Taggart Creek in the center of the property that
flows east to west.
ECS conducted a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) of the site dated April 6, 2018 (ECS Project
Number 49-6535). As a part of the historical and regulatory research conducted during the Phase I ESA, the
following recognized environmental conditions (RECs) were identified:
• ECS considers the potential for an undocumented release from the on -site reportedly 5,000-gallon
heating oil underground storage tank (UST) to be a REC of the subject property;
• ECS considers the potential for the documented tetrachloroethlene (PCE) contamination on the
west adjoining property, Salvista Trading LLC, to impact the subject property to be a REC of the
subject property.
In an effort to determine if the subject property has been impacted by the RECs identified during the
Phase I ESA, ECS was contracted to conduct an environmental assessment. Project information is based
on correspondence between Mr. Adam Duerr with Exeter Property Group, Mr. Matthew McDuffie and
Mr. David Valentine with ECS, and the previously cited Phase I ESA.
2.0 SCOPE OF SERVICES
The environmental assessment consisted of the collection of soil samples. Drilling activities were
conducted using a Geoprobe® drill rig. The subcontractor used for this project was 3D Environmental
Investigations (3D). Drilling and sampling activities were conducted on April 23, 2018. A photographic
log documenting the field sampling activities is provided in Appendix A.
2.1 Public Utility Locate
Prior to implementing the field activities, ECS contacted North Carolina public utility locate service (811)
to locate/mark public utilities at the site. Required separation distances between subsurface activities
and marked utilities (typically 30-inches) were maintained during the field activities.
2.2 Monitoring Well Permit
Prior to commencing with field activities, ECS obtained a temporary monitoring well permit from the
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (NCDEQ) and a subsurface investigation permit
from Mecklenburg County. A copy of the temporary monitoring well permit and the subsurface
investigation permit is included in Appendix B. In accordance with the NCDEQ permit, the well
construction and well abandonment forms for each temporary monitoring well were submitted to the
NCDEQ. The forms were completed by the North Carolina licensed well driller.
Report of Environmental Assessment
Meadow Oak Industrial
ECS Project No. 49:6535-8
May 10, 2018
2.3 Soil Boring Activities
Four soil borings, SB-1 through SB-4, were advanced at the site. The borings were advanced in the
vicinity of previously identified heating oil UST. The boring/sample locations are depicted on Figure 4.
The soil borings were advanced by hydraulically driving a five-foot long, 1.5-inch diameter soil sampling
probe into the soil to a depth of 15 feet below ground surface (bgs). Prior to advancing each boring, the
down -hole equipment was decontaminated utilizing a pressure washer and municipal water. The down -
hole equipment was decontaminated to prevent cross -contamination between boring locations.
Continuous soil samples were collected from each of the soil boring locations using a soil sampling probe
lined with a dedicated disposable clear plastic tube. After the soil sampling probe was driven, the clear
plastic tube filled with soil was removed from the probe and cut open to expose the soil. ECS visually
classified the soil collected from each boring and screened the soil samples for relative levels of volatile
organic vapors using a photoionization detector (PID).
Soil samples were collected from the depth that showed evidence of impact (i.e. odor, staining, and/or
elevated PID readings). If no evidence of impact was observed, then samples were collected above the
water table at bottom of the boring for laboratory analysis. Boring logs depicting the lithology, PID
readings, and sample depths are included as Appendix C.
2.4 Groundwater Boring Activities
Three groundwater borings (GW-1 through GW-3) were advanced for the attempted collection of
groundwater samples. Groundwater borings GW-1 and GW-2 were drilled along the northwestern property
boundary adjacent to the previously identified off -site environmental concern. Groundwater boring GW-3
was drilling in the immediate vicinity of the heating oil UST. The locations of the groundwater borings are
depicted on Figure 3.
The groundwater borings were drilled by hydraulically driving a four -foot long, one -inch diameter water -
sampling probe into the soil to an approximate depth of five feet beneath the water table as estimated
during drilling or until rock refusal.
Drilling refusal was encountered above the water table at each of the groundwater boring locations.
Groundwater boring GW-1 encounter rock refusal at approximately 30 feet below ground surface (bgs);
groundwater boring GW-2 encountered rock refusal at approximately 18.5 feet bgs; and groundwater
boring GW-3 encountered rock refusal at approximately 35 feet bgs. Temporary monitoring wells were set
with 1-inch slotted PVC screen and riser and allowed to sit overnight to allow groundwater to come into the
borings. ECS personnel returned to the subject property the following day (April 24, 2018) with a water
level meter to gauge the temporary monitoring wells. Recoverable amounts of groundwater were not
detected in each of the temporary monitoring wells. Therefore, no groundwater samples were collected.
Following the completion of the groundwater gauging activities, the downhole equipment was removed
and the borings were properly abandoned.
2
E&�
Report of Environmental Assessment
Meadow Oak Industrial
ECS Project No. 49:6535-8
May 10, 2018
2.5 Soil Sample Collection
Soil samples were collected by ECS personnel wearing a dedicated pair of disposable nitrile gloves. Soil
samples were retrieved from the Geoprobe® in five-foot clear plastic sleeves. New sleeves were used for
each sample to ensure no cross contamination. The soil samples were placed directly into laboratory
provided containers.
The soil sample containers were labeled with ECS project number, sample identification, sample date
and time, and requested analytical analysis. The containers were placed into a cooler with ice to
maintain the samples at approximately 4° Celsius (C°). The soil samples were submitted to REDlab
located in Wilmington, North Carolina for chemical analysis for total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH)
using ultraviolet fluorescence (UVF). ECS maintained proper chain -of -custody (COC) procedures
throughout the sample collection and transportation process. Copies of the COCs are included in Appendix
D.
3.0 RESULTS
3.1 Soil Sample Results
Laboratory analysis of soil samples (SB-1, SB-2, and SB-4) did not detect concentrations of TPH above
laboratory reporting limits. The laboratory analytical report is included in Appendix D.
Laboratory analysis of soil sample SB-3 detected concentrations of TPH Diesel Range Organic (TPH-DRO)
compounds (3,149 mg/kg) and Gasoline Range Organic (TPH-GRO) compounds (24,639 mg/kg) above
NCDEQ state action levels.
4.0 CONCLUSIONS
Based on the results of the field activities and laboratory analysis, ECS concludes the following:
• Petroleum -related compounds were detected at concentrations above their applicable state
action levels in soil sample SB-3 indicating that there has been a release from the heating oil
UST, impacting the soil at the site.
5.0 RECOMMENDATIONS
Based on the results of the environmental assessment, ECS recommends the following:
• ECS considers the detection of petroleum -related compounds above the NCDEQ state action
levels to be reportable. ECS recommends that a copy of this report be submitted to the property
owner and that they consult legal counsel regarding their reporting obligation.
• ECS recommends the proper closure and removal of the heating oil UST and petroleum -
impacted soil in accordance with the NCDEQ UST Closure Guidelines prior to purchasing the
subject property.
3
E&�
Report of Environmental Assessment
Meadow Oak Industrial
ECS Project No. 49:6535-8
May 10, 2018
• Prior to commencing site redevelopment activities, ECS recommends consultation with NCDEQ
regarding management of petroleum impacted soil, if encountered, during grading or site
redevelopment.
There is potential that the documented off -site PCE impacts at the adjacent Salvista Trading LLC
facility could have impacted the northwestern portion of the subject property. ECS was unable
to collect groundwater samples at time of drilling, therefore, it is recommended that monitoring
wells be installed in the areas that encountered rock refusal before the water table using an air
rig to obtain groundwater samples and/or that soil gas testing be completed in the northwest
portion of the subject property to address possible vapor intrusion risk associated with
proposed redevelopment plan.
6.0 QUALIFICATIONS OF REPORT
The activities and evaluative approaches used in this assessment are consistent with those normally
employed in environmental assessment projects of this type. Our evaluation of site conditions has been
based on our understanding of the site project information and the data obtained during our field
activities. This report was prepared for the express use of Exeter Property Group. Use of this report by
other individuals or companies implies their acceptance of the General Conditions of Service of the
original contract.
4
E&�
FIGURES
I 1
5 1
� I f
IL
� �� -� 5 • r � - L � 'I �r i
Al
Lf
5 ' L -k � � I • �5k � j
5.• - r, ti 1 L - 4 - � 1 ��
� II
{ L � 7 � 5• ' 'f � 'l_ _•J� � - r' � I III
-
5
1 � k
I
rn '• j _ r {�I
' I4 I� III _•_ -
4 titi Th a A t `-
Inr tUte Of 11
gal• I&tte
SOURCE:
USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP
CHARLOTTE WEST, NC
2016
1
FIGURE 1
SITE LOCATION MAP
MEADOW OAK INDUSTRIAL
4101 MEADOW OAK DRIVE
CHARLOTTE, MECKLENBURG COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
ECS PROJECT NO. 49-6535-B
sfidm".O. 4.
I
t � t
u
LEGEND
® Approximate Sample Location
0 Approximate UST Location
SOURCE: FIGURE 4
SAMPLE LOCATION MAP
GOGGLE EARTH
2018 MEADOW OAK INDUSTRIAL
4101 MEADOW OAK DRIVE
SCALE AS SHOWN CHARLOTTE, MECKLENBURG COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
ECS PROJECT NO. 49-6535-B
TABLES
TABLE 1: SUMMARY OF SOIL ANALYTICAL RESULTS
MEADOW OAK INDUSTRIAL
4101 MEADOW OAK DRIVE
CHARLOTTE, MECKLENBURG COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
ECS PROJECT NO. 49-6535-B
Parameter
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Sample ID
SB-1
SB-2
SB-3
SB-4
Sample Depth (ft)
0-5'
10'-15'
5'-10'
10'-15'
NCDEQ State Action
PID Readings
0.4
0.1
600
0.1
Level(mg/kg)
Collection Date
4/20/18
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons by Ultraviolet Fluorescence (UVF)
Gasoline Range Organics (GRO)
<0.28
<0.26
3,149
<0.27
50
Diesel Range Organics (DRO)
<0.28
<0.26
24,639
<0.27
100
Notes:
Results presented in milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg), analogous to parts per million (ppm)
NCDEQ= North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
APPENDIX A
-- \\\� yam• - �
4
Photograph 1: General view of soil borings S13-4 prior to drilling activities
Photograph 2: View of groundwater boring S13-3 during drilling activities
PHOTOGRAPHIC LOG
MEADOW OAK INDUSTRIAL
4101 MEADOW OAK DRIVE
CHARLOTTE, MECKLENBURG COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
ECS PROJECT NO 49-6535-B
APPENDIX 6
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY - DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES
APPLICATION FOR PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT A MONITORING OR RECOVERY WELL SYSTEM
PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT CLEARLY -
In accordance with the provisions of Article 7, Chapter 87, General Statutes of North Carolina and regulations pursuant thereto,
application is hereby made fora permit to construct monitoring or recovery wells.
1. Date: 4/17l18 FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
2. County: Mecklenburq PERMIT NO, ISSUED DATE
3. What type of well are you applying for? (monitoring or recovery):
4. Applicant: Adam Duerr — Exeter Prone dy Group Telephone: 404.427-9313
Applicant's Mailing Address: 6285 Barfield Road.. Sulte 225, Atlanta Georgia 30328
Applicant's Email Address (if available): aduerrcOexeterpq,com
5. Contact Person (if different than Applicant): Chris Orrell Telephone: 7042003436
Contact Person's Mailing Address: 1812 Center Park Drive.Suite D, Charlotte, NC 28217
Contact Person's Email Address (if available):
6. Property Owner (if different than Applicant):
Property Owner's Mailing Address:
Property Owner's Email Address (if available):
7. Property Physical Address (Including PIN Number) 4101 Meadow Oak Drive — PIN-14326112
Telephone: -1Pr4 349.8844
Rullcd4-, , IJc�
City Charlotte County Mocklenburg Zip Code 28208
8. Reason for Welts): Assessment
(ex: non -discharge permit requirements, suspected contamination, assessment, groundwater contamination, remediation, etc.)
9. Type of facility or site for which the well(s) is(are) needed: Heating Oil UST and off -site Brownfields
(ex: non -discharge facility, waste disposal site, landfill, UST, etc.)
10. Are there any current water quality permits or incidents associated with this facility or site? If so, list permit and/or incident no(s).
11. Type of contaminants being monitored or recovered:
(ex: organics, nutrients, heavy metals, etc.)
12. Are there any existing wells associated with the proposed well(s)? If yes, how many? No
Existing Monitoring or Recovery Well Construction Permit No(s), No
13. Distance from proposed well(s) to nearest known waste or pollution source (in feet):
14, Are there any water supply wells located less than 500 feel from the proposed well(s)?
If yes, give distance(s)
15. Well Contractor 3-D Environnlentel Investigations LLC Certification No
Well Contractor Address: 2157 Mocksville Highway. Statesville, NC
PROPOSED WELL CONSTRUCTION INFORMATION
As required by 15A NCAC 02C .0105(f)(7). attach a well construction diagram of each well showing the following:
a. Borehole and well diameter e Type of casing material and thickness
b. Estimated well depth I. Grout horizons
c Screen intervals g. Well head completion details
d Sand/gravel pack intervals
Continued on Reverse
PROPOSED WELL CONSTRUCTION INFORMATION (Continued)
2. Number of wells to be constructed in unconsolidated
material: 3
3. Number of wells to be constructed in bedrock: 0
4. Total Number of wells to be constructed: 3
(add answers from 2 and 3)
How will the well(s) be secured? Expanding Cao &
6. Estimated beginning construction date: 4/23/18
Estimated construction completion date: _ 4123/'18
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
As required by 15A NCAC 02C .0105(f)(5), attach a scaled map of the site showing the locations of the following
a. All properly boundaries, at least one of which is referenced to a minimum of two landmarks such as identified roads,
intersections, streams, or lakes within 500 feet of the proposed well or well system.
b. All existing wells, identified by type of use, within 500 feet of the proposed well or well system.
C. The proposed well or well system.
d. Any lest borings within 500 feet of proposed well or well system.
e. All sources of known or potential groundwater contamination (such as septic tank systems, pesticide, chemical or fuel
storage areas, animal feedlots as defined in G.S. 143-215.10B(5), landfills, or other waste disposal areas) within 500 feet
of the proposed well or well system.
SIGNATURES
The Applicant hereby agrees that the proposed well(s) will be constructed in accordance with approved specifications and conditions of
this Well Construction Permit as regulated under the Well Construction Standards (Title 15A of the North Carolina Administrative Code,
��% l�Subchapter 2C) and accepts full responsibility for compliance with these rules
'�Jl%l/f,�'i �/, ._G..'r— %�l� /=Xr,'!-ram f//OL• /41fi>Gla.� I:r1</ LLC
Signature of Applic .e A ent Title of Applicant or *Agent
AGI G, In 1) w 6 vr-- * If signing as Agent, attach authorization agreement staling
Printed name of Applicant or *Agent that you have the authority to act as the Agent.
If the property is owned by someone other than the applicant, the property owner hereby consents to allow the applicant to construct
wells as outlined in this Well Construction Permit application and that it shall be the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that the
we I s conform to the Well Construction Slandards Title 15A of the North Carolina Administrative Code, Subchapter 2C)..
OeTd L7n/A 2DF7��4CTl�1O✓>pI� P1�/�t7rl/S�c 0^6 3TilTfi' dl xTfrQF�/cam
Signature of Properly Owner (if different than Applicant) Printed name of Property Owner (if different than Applicant)
DIRECTIONS - T.
Please send the completed application to the appropriate Division of Water Resources' Regional Office:
Asheville Regional Office Raleigh Regional Office Wilmington Regional Office
2090 U S Highway 70 3800 Barrett Drive 127 Cardinal Drive Extension
Swamlanoa, NC 28778 Raleigh, NC 27609 Wilmington, NC 2840.5
Phone: (828)296-4500 Phone: (919)791-4200 Phone: (910)796-7215
Fax: (828) 299-7043 Fax: (919) 571-4718 Fax: (910) 350-2004
Fayetteville Regional Office
225 Green Street, Suite 714
Fayetteville, NC 28301-5094
Phone (910)433-3300
Fax: (910) 486-0707
Mooresville Regional Office
610 East Center Avenue
Mooresville, NC 28115
Phone: (704)663-1699
Fax: (704)663-6040
Washington Regional Office
943 Washington Square Mall
Washington, NC 27889
Phone: (252)946-6481
Fax: (252) 975-3716
Winston-Salem Regional Office
450 W. Hanes Mill Road
Suite 300
Winston-Salem, NC 27105
Phone. (336)776-9800
Fax: (336) 776-9797
GW-2"AjR Rcv 3-1-2016
I •�
l
I 1 M1�
• 1 �I I � �y f.
�
1 r'
IJ
JL
SITE
+1� i1'I!; IIM •t .'r� it � f� icy -
f 1
' The Art
1
Ins-btutc t#
• L'a'"! iir- - _ _-�I � — r .ill' �•
104{}tt I F :1 1'�:!; 1.1 1 { 1- i rl S111
SOURCE: FIGURE 1
USGS Topographic Map TOPOGRAPHIC LOCATION MAP
Charlotte West Quadrangle
2017 Meadow Oak Drive
Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
SCALE:
AS SHOWN ECS Project Number 49-6535-B
TM
GROUND
CI IRrArF
TOP OF DIRECT PUSH STEEL
RODS ABOVE THE LAND
SURFACE
30 FEET
1.5-INCH STEEL DIRECT
NATURAL FORMATION
PUSH RISER
BACKFILL
2--INCH BORE
HOLE
GROUNDWATER
SLOTTED STEEL SCREEN
0.01-INCH SLOT WIDTHS
SET TO INTERSECT GROUNDWA7
17
ESTIMATED 4 FEET IN LENGTH
WELL CONTRUCTION DIAGRAM H
REPRESENTATIVE OF DIRECT PUSH SC
Df11AIT CAMDI GD
NOT TO SCALE
'ER
:REEN
FIGURE 3
PROPOSED TEMPORARY SCREEN
POINT SAMPLER
Meadow Oak Drive
Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
ECS Project Number 49-6535-B
APPENDIX C
PROJECT: Meadow Oak Industrial BORING NUM. SB-4
r_ ,
CLIENT: Exeter Property Group PROJECT NO. 6535-B
E
LOCATION:
ELEVATION:
O
In the vicinity of the heating oil UST
k
DRILLER:
DATE DRILLED:
LOGGED BY:
3-D Environmental
4-23-18
SAB
DRILL RIG:
DEPTH TO WATER:
Geo robe
Elevation/
o c
n
a
0)
_
o
Z
o 0
C
`" .N
SOIL DESCRIPTION
Depth (Ft)
m
(D
U
0
Tops il
2.5
0.1
CH
Slightly moist, stiff, red and orange clay
5
7.5
0 1
CH/SC
Slightly moist, slightly stiff, orange sandy clay
10
12.5
0.1
S113-4
CH/SC PWR
Tan sandy clay and PWR
15
Bottom of the boring
17.
Paae 1 of 1
PROJECT: Meadow Oak Industrial BORING NUM. SB-3
r: ,
CLIENT: Exeter Property Group PROJECT NO. 6535-B
E
LOCATION:
ELEVATION:
O
In the vicinity of the heating oil UST
k
DRILLER:
DATE DRILLED:
LOGGED BY:
3-D Environmental
4-23-18
SAB
DRILL RIG:
DEPTH TO WATER:
Geo robe
Elevation/
o c
n
a
0)
_
o
Z
o 0
C
`" .N
SOIL DESCRIPTION
Depth (Ft)
m
(D
U
0
Tops il
2.5
391
CH
Slightly moist, stiff, red and orange clay
PHC Odor
5
7.5
600
SB-3
CH/SC
Slightly moist, slightly stiff, greenish -brown sandy clay
Strong PHC odor
10
12.
400
CH/SC PW
Tan sandy clay and PWR
PHC odor
15
Bottom of the boring
17.
Paae 1 of 1
PROJECT: Meadow Oak Industrial BORING NUM. SB_2
r: ,
CLIENT: Exeter Property Group PROJECT NO. 6535-B
E
LOCATION:
ELEVATION:
O
In the vicinity of the heating oil UST
k
DRILLER:
DATE DRILLED:
LOGGED BY:
3-D Environmental
4-23-18
SAB
DRILL RIG:
DEPTH TO WATER:
Geo robe
Elevation/
o c
n
a
0)
_
o
Z
o 0
C
`" .N
SOIL DESCRIPTION
Depth (Ft)
m
(D
U
0
Tops il
2.5
0.2
CH
Slightly moist, stiff, red and orange clay
5
7.5
0 1
CH/SC
Slightly moist, slightly stiff, orange sandy clay
10
12.5
0.2
S113-2
CH/SC PWR
Tan sandy clay and PWR
15
Bottom of the boring
17.
Paae 1 of 1
PROJECT: Meadow Oak Industrial BORING NUM. S13-1
r_ ,
CLIENT: Exeter Property Group PROJECT NO. 6535-B
E
LOCATION:
ELEVATION:
O
In the vicinity of the heating oil UST
k
DRILLER:
DATE DRILLED:
LOGGED BY:
3-D Environmental
4-23-18
SAB
DRILL RIG:
DEPTH TO WATER:
Geo robe
Elevation/
o c
n
a
0)
_
o
Z
o 0
C
`" .N
SOIL DESCRIPTION
Depth (Ft)
m
(D
U
°
Topsoil
2.5
0.4
S113-1
CH
Slightly moist, stiff, red and orange clay
5
7.5
0 1
CH/SC
Slightly moist, slightly stiff, orange sandy clay
10
12.5
0.0
CH/SC PWR
Tan sandy clay and PWR
15
Bottom of the boring
17.
Paae 1 of 1
APPENDIX D
REOL.AB-
Q-ED-
RAPID iN YIR�NMS NTAL CIAO- STtCB
Hydrocarbon Analysis Results
-.Ao..POS
Client: ECS
Samples taken
Monday, April 23, 2018
Address: 1812 CENTER PARK DR
Samples extracted
Monday, April 23, 2018
SUITE D
Samples analysed
Wednesday, April 25, 2018
CHARLOTTE, NC 28217
Contact: CHRIS ORRELL
Operator
PANTESCO
Project: MEADOW OAKS
H09382
Matrix
Sample ID
Dilution
BTEX
GRO
DRO
TPH
Total
Aromatics
16 EPA
BaP
% Ratios
HC Fingerprint Match
used
(C6 - C9)
(C5 - C10)
(C10 - C35)
(c5 - C35)
(C10-C35)
PAHs
C5-
C10-
C18
C10
C18
s
SB-1
11.2
<0.28
<0.28
<0.28
0.33
0.33
<0.09
<0.011
0 60.9
39.1
Residual HC,(BO),(P)
S
S13-2
10.2
<0.26
<0.26
<0.26
<0.26
<0.05
<0.08
<0.01
0
33.7
66.3
Residual HC,(BO),(P)
S
SB-3
4394.0
<109.9
3149
24639
27788
11968
438.7
<4.4
74.5
23.8
1.7
Deg.Diesel 78.1 %,(FCM)
S
S13-4
11.0
<0.27
<0.27
<0.27
<0.27
<0.05
<0.09
<0.011
0
0
0
,(FCM),(BO)
Concentration values in mg/kg for soil samples and mg/L for water samples. Soil values uncorrected for moisture or stone content. Fingerprints provide a tentative hydrocarbon identification.
Abbreviations :- FCM = Results calculated using Fundamental Calibration Mode:
% = confidence of hydrocarbon identification : (PFM) = Poor Fingerprint Match : (T) = Turbid : (P) = Particulate detected
B = Blank Drift: (SBS)/(LBS) = Site Specific or Library Background Subtraction applied to result: (BO) = Background Organics detected : (OCR) =
Outside cal range : (M) = Modifed Result.
% Ratios estimated aromatic carbon number proportions
: HC = Hydrocarbon : PHC = Petroleum HC : FP = Fingerprint only. Data generated by HC-1 Analyser
rD
0
rD
CD
rD
rD
00
CD
0
(D
0-
-A
0
w
LA
rD
rD
3
rD
3
rD
rD
ID
Ln
10-
3
m
rD
3
m
j
rD
o I
�`
r+
\�
J"j
n
0
-V
=-
m
3
-0
-
n
0
>
cL
r)
=
rD
0
=5
(D
2.
rD
r)
:3
a)
0-
(D
(D
(D
0-
:Z
(D
--e
�
��
�
\
\
I r�l
/\/
\�
Cl
r)
X
>
z
m
0 z
-n <
c
m
0
C
z
0 :K
M
m
Z
-n
0
>
z
r
a
>
Z >
> L)
>
Z
0
>
�Ull
CO rn
�
\ � � /
ej
0
=zz
3
r—D
F'
cr
r,i
00 0
D rD
a-
m
(D r—
rj
>
0 (D
(D
0